The URL can be used to link to this page

CCPC Agenda 09/06/2018COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 September 6, 2018 9: 00 AM Mark Strain - Chairman Karen Homiak - Vice -Chair Diane Ebert -Secretary Patrick Dearborn Ned Fryer Stan Chrzanowski, Environmental Joseph Schmitt, Environmental Thomas Eastman, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Collier County Planning Commission Page I Printed 812912018 September 2018 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes A. August 2, 2018 CCPC minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Advertised Public Hearings A. PUDZ-PL20170001733: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2005-36, the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development, by increasing the permissible number of dwelling units from 184 to 300; by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 23.15+/- acres of land zoned rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD; by revising the development standards; by amending the master plan; adding deviations; revising developer commitments and by approval of an affordable housing density bonus agreement for the added 23.15 acres that will generate 46 bonus units for low or moderate income residents. The property is located on the west side of Greenway Road east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), and north of U.S. 41, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 59.90+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: C. James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] B. PUDZ-PL20170004414 Russell Square: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district with a portion of the real property in a ST overlay (Special Treatment) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Russell Square RPUD to allow development of up to 230 multi -family dwelling units on property located east of Santa Barbara Boulevard and approximately 1/4 mile south of Davis Boulevard in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 32.9+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: C. James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 8/29/2018 September 2018 C. PL20170001729: A Resolution amending Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order 90-3, as amended) for the Halstatt/Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact by providing for: Section One, amendments to Development Order by revising the Master Plan to relocate unbuilt access locations from Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to access locations on Livingston Road for access only to the areas of the PUD identified as FP&L easement located south of Grey Oaks Drive East; amendments to Exhibit E, Development Order access conditions and Sub -Exhibit 1, project access locations and Sub -Exhibit 2 project access conditions; Section Two, findings of fact; Section Three, conclusions of law; and Section Four, effect of previously issued Development Orders, transmittal to Department Of Economic Opportunity and effective date. The subject property is located at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Airport -Pulling Road in Sections 24, 25 and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to Agenda item PL20170001548-Grey Oaks MPUD) [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner] D. PL20170001548: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance No. 07-40, the Grey Oaks MPUD, by relocating unbuilt access locations on Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to Livingston Road for access only to the areas of the PUD identified as FP&L easement located south of Grey Oaks Drive East, and by providing an effective date. The subject MPUD consisting of 1,601+/- acres is located at the northeast, northwest, and southeast quadrants of the intersection of Airport Road (S.R. 31) and Golden Gate Parkway (C.R. 886), in Sections 24, 25, and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to Agenda item PL20170001729-Halstatt/Grey Oaks DRI) [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner] E. PUDA-PL20180000049: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 07-26, as amended, the I-75/Alligator Alley CPUD, to allow for the development of up to 425 multi -family dwelling units in addition to the existing permitted maximum 265,000 square feet of office and retail uses and a 107 room motel, subject to a maximum of 1,172 two-way p.m., peak hour trips for the entire PUD; to add an additional Master Plan to reflect the site layout if the property is developed with both residential and commercial uses, and to limit residential uses to the area identified as "C/R;" to add development standards for residential uses; to modify development commitments relating to environmental, transportation, utilities, water management, affordable housing, and land use and project phasing requirements; and to add deviations relating to preserve standards. The subject property is located on the northwest corner of the Collier Boulevard and Davis Boulevard intersection, in Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 40.8E acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] 10. New Business 11. Old Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 8/29/2018 09/06/2018 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 5.A Item Summary: August 2, 2018 CCPC minutes Meeting Date: 09/06/2018 Prepared by: Title: Operations Analyst — Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Name: Judy Puig 08/29/2018 1:07 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning — Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 08/29/2018 1:07 PM Approved By: Review: 5.A Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 08/29/2018 1:07 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 09/06/2018 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 4 5.A.1 August 2, 2018 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida, August 2, 2018 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: ALSO PRESENT: CHAIRMAN: Mark Strain Stan Chrzanowski Patrick Dearborn Diane Ebert Edwin Fryer Karen Homiak Joe Schmitt Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager C. James Sabo, Principal Planner Jeffrey Klatzkow, County Attorney Scott Stone, Assistant County Attorney Tom Eastman, School District Representative Page 1 of 10 Packet Pg. 5 5.A.1 August 2, 2018 I a MIX" 92 92 1182 EMI CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning, everyone. Now that Patrick's here we can start. Welcome to the August 2nd meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. If everybody will please rise for Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Roll call by the secretary, please. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Yes. Good morning. Mr. Eastman? MR. EASTMAN: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Mr. Chrzanowski? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Mr. Fryer? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Mrs. Ebert is here. Mr. Strain? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Mrs. Homiak? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Mr. Schmitt? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: And, Mr. Dearborn? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Been here for a while. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Okay. Addenda to the agenda. There's need for a continuance of the first item up, which is 9A, the White Lake Corporate Planned Unit Development. They've asked for a continuance to August 16th. And, just for some background, after the packets came out last week, there was a couple things that were missing. One was a finalization on how this alternative looping system may or may not occur with the utilities department. They've now provided some language that needs some time for the applicant to review and staff to further massage, if needed. And the other piece was we got a supplemental Traffic Impact Statement. But any time -- and I would like staff, going forward, to remember this: Any project that exists in Collier County that's coming in for a PUDA or any other PDI or any other format that involves a change in quantities or uses and there's any need for a review of the TIS, we need more than just the current one. We need the one that everything's based on. And that's one of the main documents that was missing. And Mr. Sawyer went through records and finally found it, but that should have been part of the analysis before we even got the packet issued. So I had -- I would suggest in the future that if these things aren't complete, just reject it until it is, because scheduling them early to this planning commission ends up in a continuance again. So hopefully in the future we can avoid so often having this happen. And I know you guys are swamped, but try to -- MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. Just to make sure I understand what happened, you're looking for the original TIS? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, there was a supplemental to the TIS in the staff report, but when you have an addition like this, we need to see what the basis was to begin with. And when I found out it wasn't even available, I asked Mike, and he hadn't had time -- he had been trying to get it, but he hadn't had a lot of luck in having it produced. MR. BELLOWS: Understood. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So from now on, I really wish those things were cleaned up before the packet was issued. With that, though, I'd like to ask the Planning Commission for a vote -- or motion to continue PL20170004428, the White Lake Corporate Park Planned Unit Development amendment to the August 16th, Page 2 of 10 Packet Pg. 6 5.A.1 August 2, 2018 first item up in August. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Make a motion. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made by Diane, seconded by Patrick. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 7-0. And that takes us to our only remaining public hearing, and it's -- well, no. That takes us past addenda to the agenda. Planning Commission absences. Does anybody know if they're not going to be here August 16th? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I will not be. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you, Ned. There were no minutes attached this week. The BCC report and recaps. We probably don't have any, Ray; they're on vacation, right? MR. BELLOWS: That's correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Chairman's report. I'm not going to delve into anything today. I think I've said all I need to. And there's nothing on consent. ***So that moves us to the remaining Item 913, PL20180001342. It's a variance request for a house located on 4190 Third Avenue Northwest in Golden Gate Estates. All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. If either of you are going to talk today, you need to stand up and be sworn in. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Disclosures from the Planning Commission. Anybody? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: None. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tom? MR. EASTMAN: None. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: None. COMMISSIONER FRYER: None. COMMISSIONER EBERT: None. C14ARUV AN STRAIN: Other than staff, I have none. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: None. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: None. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: None. C14ARUV AN STRAIN: Okay. For your benefit, I know you're probably new and wondering what all this is about. You need to come to one of the microphones, whoever -- basically, there's no members of the public here, so that means I'm not going to ask you to make a presentation because you're probably not prepared to do it. But if you could come up to the microphone, identify yourself for the record and spell your name, last name. MR. LEITI: Robert Leiti, L -e -i -t -i. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Now, we've got a packet that's quite a few pages in front of us involving your application. And I know we've all read it, so I don't think we need to have you read it back to us again as is done when there's members of the public here so they get the benefit of hearing what you've got Page 3 of 10 Packet Pg. 7 5.A.1 August 2, 2018 to say. And I'll just move right into it. You will basically have a -- like a storage facility or a workshop built on your house? MR. LEITI: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The time you built it, apparently you didn't know that there was a permit needed, and it was built in the setback for that particular location. MR. LEITI: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I don't want to stop you from saying anything, so if you've got anything you want to add to the record, please tell us. I'm just trying to help you along because I can tell you probably haven't done this before. MR. LEITI: I'm new. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And, basically, I think we've all seen the aerial and all the snapshots of your survey and stuff like that. Now you've come in, as the process requires, to require (sic) a variance to allow the house or the facility that you -- accessory use to remain where it is. And I'll just turn it over to the Planning Commission. Does anybody here have any questions? COMMISSIONER EBERT: Yes, I do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, Diane. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Were you the original owners in'98? You built? MR. LEITI: No, we were -- COMMISSIONER EBERT: I can't -- that mike is not working. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Just pull the mike a little closer to you. I'm sorry. MR. LEITI: We're the third -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: Mike's not working. MR. LEITI: We're the third owners. Should I move to the other mike? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, that should -- here he comes. Unfortunately, everything has to be recorded, and it doesn't get recorded unless that mike's working. So we'll see if he can adjust it for us. MR. LEITI: We're the third owners. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. And when did you move in? MR. LEITI: What year was that? Nine years ago? MS. LEITI: No, it's been 11 years ago. MR. LEITI: About 11 years ago. '07 was it? Yeah. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Eleven years ago you moved in? MR. LEITI: Correct. COMMISSIONER EBERT: And you had no idea that Collier County, you get permits? MR. LEITI: Well, yeah. We -- in fact, we just put a pool in, and we had our roof done, and, you know, I pulled permits for them. In fact, I was building the shed when we had the pool put in. And, I mean, the tax collector came out and took pictures and all, and he didn't say anything. It's -- MS. LEITI: You didn't know you needed it. MR. LEITI: No. I didn't know we needed it. I mean, for a shed -- it's strictly a shed. It's not -- there's no running water in it. There's no sewer in it. COMMISSIONER EBERT: No, I understand. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But what they're doing now is correcting that oversight, and they'll have to go through an after -the -fact permitting process, Ray? MR. BELLOWS: Yes, that is correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So everything will be handled by that methodology. COMMISSIONER EBERT: That I understand. But the shed is also movable, is it not? MR. LEITI: Is it moveable? COMMISSIONER EBERT: Yes, you can -- because of the -- of what it's sitting on? MR. LEITI: Well, they move houses, so, yes, I guess they could. I mean, it's a good-sized shed. It's 16 by 40. Page 4 of 10 Packet Pg. 8 5.A.1 August 2, 2018 COMMISSIONER EBERT: Yes. MR. LEITI: So it's a nice -sized shed. But, as I say, it's just all tools and stuff like that and kids toys and a lot memorabilia in there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And your neighbor wrote a letter of no objection. He doesn't have any problem with this. He's the only affected party in this matter. MR. LEITI: Yes. No, he has no objection at all. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I notice that the number -- the distance is greater than an acre -- if you were an acre -and -a -quarter lot, you could have that setback down to seven -and -a -half feet. You're greater than that. MR. LEITI: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And you're greater than a lot of the subdivisions like Old Cypress where they're only five feet. So from that perspective, I didn't see a problem with it. Joe? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Two questions. One is, what was the -- what did you pay for the submittal here for the variance? MR. LEITI: For this variance? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. MR. LEITI: Approximately 5,000. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's what I thought; 4,000 plus, so $5,000. MR. LEITI: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And, of course, then you're going to have to get an after -the -fact building permit. MR. LEITI: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Has it been designed and will it meet all the criteria for anchoring and wind -load standards and hurricane standards? MR. LEITI: There's some strapping I was told I was missing. (Multiple speakers speaking.) COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Correct. My question then would be because it's on footers, you're going to have to adequately anchor it so that it's -- MR. LEITL• Right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- secure? MR. LEITI: Right, right. It is secured in 16 spots. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. MR. LEITI: Because it's on the concrete piles, like. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Footers, yeah, piles, okay. MR. LEITI: Yeah. I have a strap on each piling. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. MR. LEITI: You know, so -- but there's some strapping -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So you know all the requirements now to go for the after -the -fact permit as well? MR. LEITI: Well, that's -- yeah. I have -- there's a guy down here at your -- building down there that's happening me with that as far as the -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: As far as the requirements for the after -the -fact permit, are you going to have to have some kind of a structural determination or structural engineer sign off and stamp and seal drawings, or are they going to accept what you already constructed? MR. LEITI: I don't think so. I think they'll accept it. It's regular 2x4 construction. It's -- I believe -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: An after -the -fact permit, if I recall, is twice the cost of an original permit at two times the cost? MR. LEITI: I have no idea. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: If I'm not mistaken. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I mean, that's -- Page 5 of 10 Packet Pg. 9 5.A.1 August 2, 2018 COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So this error could probably end up costing you, I don't know, almost $6,000 by the time you're done? MR. LEITI: I believe it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So anybody else have any questions? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I do. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ned? COMMISSIONER FRYER: Was this outbuilding constructed by a contractor? MR. LEITI: No, no. I built it myself. COMMISSIONER FRYER: You did it yourself? MR. LEITI: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. And you didn't know that there would be a requirement for a permit? MR. LEITI: No, I did not. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. I have some questions for staff, but I'll wait. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Ned -- or Stan? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: You said "pilings." Did you mean, like, piers, or did you actually drive pilings? MR. LEITI: No, piers. I poured concrete. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. Was the neighbor there when you were doing this? Did he live there? MR. LEITI: Oh, yeah. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: And he never said anything? MR. LEITI: No. He wants me to build him one, and I said -- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: That's why he doesn't have a problem with it. MR. LEITI: -- you better go down to the county building first. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Thanks a lot. MR. LEITI: All right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else? He said he wanted him to build him one. If you do, don't put it this close to the property line. MR. LEITI: No, no. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other questions of the gentleman at this time? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir. I think that's all we need from you at this point. We'll call you back up if we need any other questions. MR. LEITI: All right. Thanks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. And Ned, you had a -- well, first of all, staff, did you have anything -- anything you wanted to add to the staff report before Ned's question? MR. SABO: Sure. For the record, James Sabo. The Zoning Division is constrained from recommending approval, as this application does not meet the standards of the Land Development Code; however, there are some mitigating factors that are listed in your staff report. Our recommendation is denial. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Now, they're asking for a variance, though. So you're -- so all variances don't meet the intent of the Land Development Code. So why would this variance seek any more of a denial -- why do you have a denial on this one and you've not had a denial on a variance that's come before us yet? MR. SABO: There are some peculiar and particular circumstances with certain properties that lend themselves to granting a variance. In this case there is not. MR. BELLOWS: And, for the record, it's based on the variance criteria in the staff report. Some Page 6 of 10 Packet Pg. 10 5.A.1 August 2, 2018 other variances may meet them a little bit more so staff can recommend approval. This one was clearly a large enough structure, close enough that -- and then there was no land -related hardship. It could have met setbacks if they -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: So what action are we taking? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, it's -- pardon me? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: So what action are we taking? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: When we get done with the discussion, we can make a motion to approve or deny. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Ned? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'm unfamiliar with passing on variances of this kind, particularly when they're after the fact, so I'm going to need to be educated a little bit. First of all, there are setback and sideline rules that are set forth in the LDC. If this matter had come to staff -- and this is hypothetical, I know. But if this had come to staff in a timely way before the structure had been built, would you have recommended approval or denial? MR. SABO: We would have worked with the applicant to strongly suggested they meet the setback requirement. So I know that they wanted it at their driveway next to the house. I understand that, and I respect it, but it's too close in terms of the setback dimensions. So we would have recommended location either at a different point in the yard or different spot in the yard 30 feet from the side lot line. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But the answer to Ned's question is you couldn't have approved it if it didn't have a 30 -foot setback if it came in before it was built. MR. SABO: That's correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. That's the answer. All that other is nice, but you couldn't have approved it. You couldn't have told them we'd like you to move it to here. They'd have to. That's the difference between coming in for a permit and getting something reviewed before you build it than after. MR. SABO: Well, my understanding of his question was if he'd have come in beforehand, what would we have said to him. So that's -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You said you'd tell him he needed a 30 -foot setback and you'd reject it until he put a 30 -foot set -- MR. SABO: That is correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's what I thought you were -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER FRYER: It is. And so, in essence, what we've got here is a situation where the -- in its presence posture, if we were to grant this, we would be granting the owner something that the owner wouldn't have gotten had the owner complied with the ordinance. MR. SABO: That is correct. COMMISSIONER FRYER: So, in other words, we would being putting the owner in a better position having violated the ordinance than if the owner had come in in a timely way and asked for a variance. MR. SABO: Well -- COMMISSIONER FRYER: Well -- MR. SABO: -- I am recommending denial because of the constraint. I understand. And, believe me, I have empathy for the applicant, because it's a big lot. There's plenty of room for the shed; however, I'm an AICP planner. I have an ethical code I have to meet. I have to uphold the Land Development Code in Collier County. MR. KLATZKOW: Hold on, hold on. This does not meet the requirements for a variance; that doesn't mean you can't grant it, all right. Because just because it does not technically meet the needs for a variance doesn't mean there's no harm, no foul. That's why we have you people here. Page 7 of 10 Packet Pg. 11 5.A.1 August 2, 2018 If it was just a question of meeting the legalities of it, staff review it, I'd sign off, we'd be done. No, it doesn't meet the requirements. But we do have you. You were appointed by the Board of County Commissioners to review these things, give you collective wisdom, and make a decision. So it's up to you whether or not you want to grant the variance. But it does not meet the legal definition of a variance. It doesn't mean you can't grant it, though. COMMISSIONER FRYER: My second question, then -- and maybe it's better directed to the County Attorney, and that is, what sort of a precedential effect are we setting if we were to grant this? MR. KLATZKOW: Every single one of these applications you review are on their own merits. Nothing you review really has any precedential value, in my opinion. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else have any questions of staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. No further questions of the applicant. There are no public here to speak. So with --you can nod your head. Did you want to add anything to the discussion you just heard? MR. LEITI: (Shakes head.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Indicating no. So with that, we'll close the public hearing, and we'll have a discussion. I just want to note to everybody, I don't believe there's any malicious intent here. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Agreed. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: He lives -- this is a big lot. He made a mistake. He's atoning to it to a huge amount of money, far more than probably the shed cost to build. The only member on this panel that has a setback less than his -- or greater than his is Stan in his development. I went and looked at the addresses of every one of you. We all have -- we all are in a situation that has a seven -and -a -half, some as low as six, side setback. So with the affected party being the neighbor, the neighbor has no problem -- qualms with this. He wrote a letter saying that. I don't know why we would want to make this an issue. So I certainly would hope that someone's going to make a motion for approval. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I make a motion that we approve the variance. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion made and seconded. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: As stated. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: As stated. Are there any further questions? COMMISSIONER FRYER: I have a comment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead, sir. COMMISSIONER FRYER: I'm going to vote in favor of this with reluctance. The reason I'm going to vote in favor of it is because the County Attorney has advised that it is not precedential. That's important to me. And I give considerable deference to the experience of the Chair and other members of this commission with regard to the equities of the matter. So I'm going to vote in favor of it but reluctantly so. C14AHZMAN STRAIN: Anybody else? Diane? COMMISSIONER EBERT: Yes. Same here. To me, this -- because it's the pilings that it's on, it can be lifted and moved somewhere else. It is not down like a house. And it's not the brick. It's -- so to me this could be lifted and put on another piece of their property. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Just as a matter of my experience, both as working in the staff for over seven years and then now on the Planning Commission, there's been similar and more -- even more egregious variances approved while I was a member of staff. It's just simply -- he's recognized the error. I believe it was because of a code enforcement issue, and you're coming in after the fact making amends doing what needs to be done. There is, in fact, no party impacted adversely. If they are, they would have objected, and they would be here, so -- and based on the County Attorney's opinion, I believe that it's certainly well within our purview to approve this. And as I state again, I recommend we approve -- or I make a motion we approve as stated. Page 8 of 10 Packet Pg. 12 5.A.1 August 2, 2018 COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All those in favor of the motion for approval signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? COMMISSIONER EBERT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 6-1. Now it will have to -- I guess it won't be on consent, then, to the Board. MR. BELLOWS: That's correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Sorry we -- you won here, but you're going to have to go to an open hearing at the Board, which means you'll be on the regular agenda. You won't be on consent agenda. That will be a little more process for you to go through, so... And with that, this particular item's complete, and we'll move on. Any new business? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any -- Joe? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'd like to ask Ray. What do we look like over the next several meetings as far as agendas? Do you have any idea? MR. BELLOWS: The next agenda or meeting -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Will White Lake come to the next meeting? MR. BELLOWS: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It will be next meeting. MR. BELLOWS: Correct, White Lake will be at the next meeting. We also have Esperanza Place, which is in Immokalee, and the Seed To Table. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. That's a parking exemption for Seed to Table, right? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Parking exemption, right, yeah, if I remember. I saw it advertised. MR. BELLOWS: Which one? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Seed to Table. MR. BELLOWS: No. Seed to Table is a rezone to create off-site parking. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. Across Livingston Road. MR. BELLOWS: Yes, but it is a rezone to a PUD. C14AHZMAN STRAIN: Gotcha. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Mr. Chairman, just a question. I know I came in almost late. The lighting seems much darker, quasi romantic in here. Have the lights all been changed in here since I was last here, or is it my imagination? COMMISSIONER FRYER: It's done for you, Patrick. C14ARUV AN STRAIN: Ah, it could have been. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: All the lights have been changed. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: It seems darker in here. Just my personal two -cents worth. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, in days past we had a gentleman on the Board named Paul Midney. Paul Midney would come through that door in the back, and five minutes to the meeting start date (sic) every -- and open those blinds up in the back. And ever since Paul's not been -- has been gone, we've had a darker room, but that's okay. And you just now noticed it. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: It's been changed a number of times. This is good at this -- this is Page 9 of 10 Packet Pg. 13 5.A.1 August 2, 2018 good. Last time it was too bright. (Multiple speakers speaking.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, let's get back to business. Is there any new business related to this board? And if not, how about any old business? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. There's no members of the public left for comments. So is there a motion -- COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Motion to adjourn. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Made by Patrick. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Second by Diane. All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries. We're out of here. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 9:23 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MARK STRAIN, CHAIRMAN ATTEST CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER These minutes approved by the Board on , as presented or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC., BY TERRI LEWIS, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. Page 10 of 10 Packet Pg. 14 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A 09/06/2018 Item Summary: PUDZ-PL20170001733: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2005-36, the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development, by increasing the permissible number of dwelling units from 184 to 300; by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 23.15+/- acres of land zoned rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD; by revising the development standards; by amending the master plan; adding deviations; revising developer commitments and by approval of an affordable housing density bonus agreement for the added 23.15 acres that will generate 46 bonus units for low or moderate income residents. The property is located on the west side of Greenway Road east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), and north of U.S. 41, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 59.90+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: C. James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 09/06/2018 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: James Sabo 08/20/2018 5:26 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning — Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 08/20/2018 5:26 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Michael Bosi Review Item Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Zoning Zoning Growth Management Department Planning Commission Ray Bellows Camden Smith Review Item Review Item James C French Review Item Mark Strain Meeting Pending 9.A Completed 08/21/2018 10:58 AM Completed 08/21/2018 11:56 AM Review Item Completed Completed 08/23/2018 5:18 PM Completed 08/24/2018 12:32 PM Completed 08/27/2018 5:50 PM 09/06/2018 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 15 9.A.1 AGENDA ITEM 9-A Coi ier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2018 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20170001733 REGAL ACRES, HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owners: Agent: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. Laura DeJohn, AICP 11145 Tamiami Trail East Johnson Engineering, Inc. Naples, FL 34113 2122 Johnson Street GHU, LLC and Newell Creek, LLC Fort Myers, FL 33901 7975 Newell Creek Drive Mentor, OH 44060 Applicant: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34113 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone 23.15 acres of land from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district to be added to the existing Regal Acres RPUD for a 59.90 acre project; and, the additional density of 116 dwelling units which includes 46 affordable bonus units for low or moderate income residents. The property is comprised of five parcels. Four owned by Habitat for Humanity and one under a purchase agreement. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 23.15 acres to be added to the existing 36.75 -acre PUD known as Regal Acres RPUD. The property is located west of Greenway Road in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (see location map, page 2). The proposed Master Plan is included as Attachment B. PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 1 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 16 Z � U G LU C9 O IL J LL aN �[emuea-lo a so PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Revised: August 20, 2018 S..L N C7 O CD C) I-- C) `C) Cq J i N E C v_ N Q 0 �a 0 Page 2 of 16 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 17 T 41 �n 1L m 990 9080 9 08�- W � F o o a9s9aaaaas m 90 qe®•a VJ V u o ® a � ;o m ° 0 o J m `I ® m p9®s5aaaaaasa Da -37 ® m m ® ❑ ® 0088850®0@00 e i V o a CL m m ® o 8a 9 8® o a ;® v peD ® m ® 5 pa559saa9pap e 9 I I q 8889 9� 09 9 999 969 9 9 p oo Qd oQ o0 00 • ° oa ao 00 0o do 00 MM MM 00 MQ :. e ° 00 00 00 00 MM 0 EQ Dd Qo d0 p0 0 oq oa Qo ao 00 ® q Qi QQ 00 QM d0 0m .. 899999999990 0 oQ oo Qo MM 00 ® p OQ od Qa 00 00 0 MM MM MM p0 pq 9 9 s ® ® MM d0 ©M MEn MG] e i © o0 0o d© on o0 M 9 ® 9 e +° 9 e9oeeaege Q Do 9q ©o Qo oQ o0 0 fl 9 a 9 =a q qo a wo ° e a qo ©0 a� MM 00 00 0o 0m ao o 0 0 0 0 9 9 qe 0 00 ©o ...... ; 0o Qo 00 0 9g e 9 q e 0 OQ ©M QO d0 0o m 9U991 s ; oQ a �9 Ina]0 CUM MEWI MOI ED . 0 0Q 0 0 0 Z � U G LU C9 O IL J LL aN �[emuea-lo a so PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Revised: August 20, 2018 S..L N C7 O CD C) I-- C) `C) Cq J i N E C v_ N Q 0 �a 0 Page 2 of 16 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 17 9.A.1 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting a rezoning of 23.15 acres from Rural Agricultural to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for the purpose of adding lands to the existing RPUD and adding density. The applicant intends to amend Ordinance number 05-36, which is the Regal Acres PUD. The existing approved PUD for Regal Acres permits 184 two-family residential units. The rezoning proposal is to add lands to the west to accommodate a maximum of 116 additional single- family residential units on 23.15 acres of property. The proposed 23.15 -acre property is comprised of five parcels, four of which are owned by Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. The applicant proposes to extend the current Majestic Circle right-of-way and develop the adjacent property, which abuts the south boundary of Naples Reserve PUD and abuts the east boundary of the Walnut Lakes PUD (Reflection Lakes subdivision). The required buffers are detailed on the Master Plan. The general pattern and style of the proposed housing development will be very similar to the existing Regal Acres PUD. The applicant intends to revise the Development Standards, amend the Master Plan, revise the Developer Commitments, and request additional deviations. Specific details for these requests are detailed in that section of the report. As part of the additional requested 116 single family residential units, the applicant is requesting a recommendation of approval for an affordable housing density bonus application for the added 23.15 acres of land, as described, that will generate 46 bonus housing units. The bonus units are intended to accommodate housing opportunities for low or moderate -income residents of Collier County. The base density permitted is four dwelling units per acre, and the applicant is seeking five dwelling units per acre (DU/A). The total number of dwelling units proposed is 300. The density bonus calculation review is detailed in the GMP Consistency Review of this report. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Single-family residential homes, zoned RPUD Naples Reserve 1.67 DU/A South: Single-family West Wind mobile home park, zoned MH Mobile Home East: Single-family residential homes, vacant agricultural, zoned A Rural Agricultural West: Single-family residential homes, zoned RPUD Walnut Lakes 3 DU/A PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 3 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 18 9.A.1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County GMP. Relevant to this petition, the Urban designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including residential developments such as RPUDs. The applicant is proposing a density bonus agreement for the 23.15 acres added, which is known as Parcel B. The applicant is proposing 116 affordable residential dwelling units at a density of 5 DU/A. (116 DUs/23.15 acres = 5.01 DU/A) in Parcel B. Under the FLUE's Density Rating System, the project is eligible for a maximum density of 3 dwelling units per acre (DU/A), with an additional bonus of up to 8 dwelling units per acre for providing affordable -workforce housing (which is proposed) for a total of 11 DU/A; eligible PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 4 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 19 9.A.1 density is not an entitlement... Since the proposed for a maximum density of 5 DU/A which is well below the maximum eligible density of 11 DU/A, the proposed density is consistent with the Density Rating System of the FLUE. Under the FLUE's Density Rating System, the project is eligible for a maximum density of three DU/A, with an additional bonus of up to eight dwelling units per acre for providing affordable - workforce housing (which is proposed) for a total of 11 DU/A; eligible density is not an entitlement. The FLUE states the following, "To encourage the provision of affordable -workforce housing within certain Districts and Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to eight (8) residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the requirements of the Affordable -workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code...)" Base Density 4 DU/A CHHA Density Reduction -1 DU/A Affordable Housing Bonus +8 DU/A Maximum eligible density 11 DU/A x 59.9 acres = 658.9 DUs = 659 DUs Since the draft housing agreement is for a maximum density of five DU/A which is well below the maximum eligible density of 11 DU/A, the proposed density is consistent with the Density Rating System of the FLUE. The Consistency Review is included as Attachment C. Based upon analysis by the Comprehensive Planning Division, the proposed PUD rezone may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 5 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 20 9.A.1 c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " The proposed PUD Amendment on the subject property was reviewed based on the 2017 AUIR Inventory Report. The TIS submitted in the application indicates that the proposed PUD will generate approximately 241 PM peak hour two-way total trips. Staff notes that the TIS further indicates that the existing development generates approximately 121 PM peak hour two-way trips and the proposed additional 116 single family residential units will generate approximately 120 PM peak hour two-way trips. The submitted TIS also contains a turn lane analysis for the intersection of Greenway Road and Majestic Circle. Staff agrees that the normally required left - in turn -lane is not required due to the number of trips on Greenway Road, the number of parcels to the north of this development served by Greenway Road and the limited ROW width on Greenway Road which also contains storm -water drainage swales which would potentially be impacted if a turn -lane were constructed. The proposed development will impact the following roadway segments: Roadway Link 2017 Current Peak 2017 Remaining AUIR Hour Peak Capacity Existing Direction Service LOS Volume/Peak Direction Tamiami Trail Collier Boulevard B 3,100/East 2,089 East (US 41) to Joseph Lane Tamiami Trail Joseph Lane to B 2,000/East 1,075 East (US 41) Greenway Road Tamiami Trail Greenway Road to D 1,075/East 248 East (US 41) San Marco Drive *Please note: 2017AUIR totals do not include the recently completed improvements on US 41. These trip totals are anticipated to improve with the 2018 AUIR. Based on the 2017 AUIR, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed trips for the amended project within the 5 -year planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 6 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 21 9.A.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 22.46 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 5.62 (25%) acres of the existing native vegetation shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.17, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. Housing Element Review: Community and Human Services staff has reviewed this petition's Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement to ensure the document contains the appropriate language to address the proposal to provide affordable housing. The Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement is a separate approval by the Board from the PUD Ordinance document. Community and Human Services finds the proposed development to be consistent with Section 2.06.00 of the LDC and the Housing Element of the GMP. The Regal Acres Parcel B development will have a maximum of 116 owner -occupied residential units targeted to low and moderate - income households for a gross density of 5 units per acre. These owner -occupied homes will have approximately 1,400 square feet of living area and will be a minimum of 3 bedrooms and one bath. Drainage: The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will also evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of site development plan (SDP) and/or platting (PPL). Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the RPUD petition to address environmental concerns. The PUD Master Plan provides a 5.62 -acre preserve, which meets the minimum 25% native preservation requirement in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. No listed animal species were observed on the property; however, data obtained from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission indicates the project is located within panther protection zones which will require a panther management plan be required at PPL or SDP review. Additionally, the data also indicates the presence of black bear in the area. A black bear management plan will also need to be included at PPL or SDP review. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 7 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 22 9.A.1 Landscape Review: The landscape buffers depicted on the Master Plan are consistent with the LDC requirements. If after removal of exotics from the preserve located on the Western portion, the preserve does not satisfy the requirements of a Type `B' buffer, trees will need to be added into the preserve in accordance with section 3.05.07 of the LDC and a single row of 5' high shrubs spaced 4' on -center will be required on the perimeter berm shown on the `Typical Preserve Section' on sheet B-2. The shrubs, if required, must be native per section 4.06.05.J.a. School District: At this time, there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development either within the concurrency service areas the development is located within or the adjacent concurrency service areas at the elementary, middle and high school levels. This finding is for planning and informational purposes only and does not constitute either a reservation of capacity or a finding of concurrency for the proposed project. At the time of site plan or plat, the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity within the concurrency service area the development is located within and adjacent concurrency service areas such that the level of service standards are not exceeded. Utilities Review: The project lies within the potable water and south wastewater service areas of the Collier County Water -Sewer District. Water and wastewater services are readily available via existing infrastructure along Majestic Circle. System capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit (SDP or PPL) review, and a commitment to provide service will be established upon permit approval. Zoninz Services Review: Zoning Division staff has evaluated the proposed uses related to their intensity and reviewed the proposed development standards for the project. The Zoning Division also evaluated the location project and the potential traffic generation. The proposed single-family residential project is located north of Tamiami Trail East in an area that is still utilized for agricultural purposes. However, there has been additional commercial and residential development beginning to occur along this portion of the East Trail. The proposed site is currently vacant and wooded. Two adjacent neighborhoods are developed as PUD, which is Naples Reserve to the north and Walnut Lakes (Reflection Lakes). Both adjacent PUD's are developed with lower density as there was no affordable housing density bonus requested. The Naples Reserve PUD was developed at 1.67 DU/A and the Walnut Lakes PUD was developed at three DU/A. West Wind mobile home park is not zoned PUD and was developed at approximately 10 DU/A. While the applicant has requested an affordable housing density bonus, the intensity of the development appears to be reasonable and has been found consistent with the GMP. With respect to Development Standards, the proposed standards are appropriate based on the single-family residential use. The Development Standards are included in the backup material. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 8 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 23 9.A.1 findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": (Zoning Division staff responses in non -bold). 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Zoning Division staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and believes the uses and property development regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area. The Public Utilities Division further states the Water distribution and wastewater collection mains are readily available within the Majestic Circle right-of-way, and there is adequate water and wastewater treatment capacity to serve the proposed PUD. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and demonstrate unified control. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the petition and analyzed it for consistency with goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. They have found the proposed amendment to be consistent with the GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. There is no deviation from the required usable open space as submitted. Compliance with approved standards would be demonstrated at the time of SDP. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Compliance with all other applicable concurrency management regulations is required, including but not limited to plat plans or site development plans. The Transportation Division further states that the roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 9 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 24 9.A.1 will be addressed at the time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to further demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. The Public Utilities Division further states that Collier County has sufficient treatment capacity for potable water and wastewater service to the project. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. For the proposed single-family residential use, there is adequate supporting infrastructure to accommodate this project, including Collier County Water -Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains. Adequate public facility requirements will be addressed when future development approvals are sought. The Public Utilities Division further states that the area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including Collier County Water -Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. The scope of any system improvements will be determined at the time of SDP or PPL permit review. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. Five deviations are proposed in the request to rezone to RPUD. Please see the deviations section of the report. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below: (Zoning Division staff responses in non -bold): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff has determined the petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern related to surrounding properties is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this report. The proposed single-family PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 10 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 25 9.A.1 residential uses will not likely change the existing land use patterns in the area. Both Naples Reserve and Walnut Lakes PUD's are developed with a similar residential pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is zoned Rural Agricultural with RPUD residential uses surround the property. The application is to rezone to RPUD, which would not create an isolated district. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed RPUD boundaries are logical and appropriate. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not specifically necessary. However, the applicant believes the rezoning is necessary to accommodate the construction of low and moderate -income (workforce) housing in Collier County. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change is not likely to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The existing neighborhood is residential, and the proposal is expanding with additional residential dwellings. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The Transportation Division states that the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. It is not anticipated that the rezone request to RPUD will create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage for this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County environmental staff will evaluate the stormwater management system and design criteria at the time of SDP or PPL. PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 11 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 26 9.A.1 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed rezone to RPUD is not likely to reduce light or air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. Property value is affected by many factors. It is driven by market conditions and is generally a subjective determination. Zoning alone is not likely to adversely affect the property values. Generally, market conditions will prevail. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Most of the adjacent property is already developed as residential use. The approval of the rezone request from A to RPUD is not likely to deter development activity of surrounding property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed rezone to RPUD complies with the GMP and is found consistent, then it is consistent with public policy and the change does not result in the granting of a special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is determined to be consistent with public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning, however, it is nearly landlocked. Additionally, the applicant cannot use the property as they have proposed without rezoning to RPUD and getting approval for the affordable housing density bonus. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The Zoning Division staff determination is the proposed uses are not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The application was reviewed and found compliant with the GMP and the LDC. The Zoning Division staff does not review other sites related to a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 12 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 27 9.A.1 would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the proposed rezone request to RPUD would require significant site alteration. The site is vacant and heavily wooded and razing, and land balancing would be required prior to any development activity at the site. The development standards would be applied during the SDP and plat process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project must comply with the criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF) and must be consistent with applicable goals and objectives of the GMP related to adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by Comprehensive Planning staff for consistency with the GMP as part of the amendment process, and they find it to be consistent. The Public Utilities Division further states that the activity proposed by this amendment will have no adverse impact on public utilities facility adequacy. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking five deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The petitioner's rationale and staff analysis/recommendation is outlined below. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.N, "Street System Requirements," which calls for minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet. This request is to allow for a 50 -foot right-of- way minimum width for a limited section of the private street network, extending for a length of approximately 350 feet and terminating in a hammerhead or Y configuration, provided that the water main will be centrally located in the 10 -foot space between the on -street parking and the right-of-way line. Petitioner's Justification: Minimum right-of-way width of 50 feet is requested to address a limited section of the private street network in the northern vicinity of the site. This segment of the private street network is approximately 350 feet in length and will serve approximately 20 homesites at the most. It is appropriate for this intimately scaled street to have 10 foot wide lanes corresponding to a more context -sensitive human scale. This reduces impervious area and reduces land dedicated to the roadway by ten feet, which in turn allows for more open space throughout the site that provides more community benefit. A 50 foot right-of-way is adequate to achieve safe and efficient vehicular, emergency vehicle, and pedestrian movement while satisfying utility and drainage needs in this location. Aside from this segment of the PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 13 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 28 9.A.1 private street network, the other roads within the RPUD will be consistent with a minimum right-of- way width of 60 feet. StaffAnalysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable as it's a stub street. The deviation should be contingent upon approval by the local Fire District. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, "On -Premises Directional Signs," which requires on -premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the edge of the roadway, paved surface or back of curb. This deviation requests a minimum setback of 5 feet from the edge of private roadway/drive aisle. Petitioner's Justification: This deviation will allow locational flexibility for directional signage internal to the RPUD. This also allows for helpful directional signage to be located between the edge of the roadway and the sidewalk. A unified design theme will apply to all signage throughout the community, thereby ensuring a cohesive appearance and attractiveness. All directional signage will meet the Clear Sight Distance requirements in accordance with LDC Section 6.06.05. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable as the proposed residential project has higher density and the design is more compact. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a, "Trees and Palms," which states that no more than 30% of required canopy trees may be substituted by palms. This deviation requests to increase the allowable substitution of palms to up to 60% of required canopy trees used to satisfy individual residential lot requirements (of LDC section 4.06.05.A.1). Petitioner's Justification: The intent is to relocate the required residential lot -tree plantings to the right-of-way and common areas where they can be maintained by the HOA and provide enhanced aesthetics around the walkways and on -street parking. Street trees may be planted in close proximity to underground utilities and sidewalks. Allowing up to 60% of the plantings in this area to be palms will reduce the degree of tree health issues in the future, minimize the impact of street trees on the utilities, and reduce the likelihood of roots heaving sidewalks or on -street parking. The quality appearance of a well -landscaped community and treelined streets is still accomplished and is more sustainable with the proposed palms substituting for up to 60% of canopy trees. StaffAnalysis and Recommendation: The LDC does not include limitations on the number of palm trees for a Street Tree Plan. The petitioner's justification seeks to allow palm trees planted within the Street Tree Plan to satisfy the canopy tree requirement for residential lots. LDC Section 4.06.05 A.1. requires one canopy tree per 3,000 sq. ft. of pervious area for each residential lot, and allows developments with a street tree program and lots of less than 3,000 sq. ft. of pervious open space to utilize street trees located directly in front of the lot to count toward that lot's required canopy tree. Since the residential tree requirement is on a lot -by -lot basis, only one tree is required for any lot with less than 3,000 sq. ft. of pervious area. Therefore, increasing the allowable percentage of palms to 60% would still require one hardwood canopy tree per lot. Since the LDC does not limit the number of palms within a Street Tree Plan, and the proposed deviation does not accomplish the applicant's intent to utilize palm trees within the street right-of-way for the required residential canopy tree requirement, Staff recommends denial of this deviation. PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 14 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 29 9.A.1 Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, "Fences and Walls" which calls for a maximum fence or wall height of 6 feet in residential components of PUDs. This deviation requests allowance for a maximum wall height of 8 feet for buffering to the southern property line and protection from the drainage ditch to the south. Petitioner's Justification: The proposed deviation will provide the adjacent West Wind mobile home park and future neighbors additional visual screening and provide a protective barrier between the proposed recreational area and the existing drainage ditch to the south. This enhances aesthetics and protects the children who will be likely to play in the recreation area. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable as the proposed fence deviation provides additional protection related to the drainage area. Deviation #5 Seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, "Dead End Streets," which calls for dead ends streets to terminate in a cul-de-sac. This deviation requests the ability to end one of the street segments within the PUD with a hammerhead or Y configuration as approved by the local Fire District. Petitioner's Justification: This deviation request applies to the limited section of the private street network in the northern vicinity of the site. This segment of the private street network is approximately 350 feet in length and will serve approximately 20 homesites at the most. A full-sized cul-de-sac on a short street of approximately 350 feet is a very inefficient use of space. The alternative fire department turnaround options of a hammerhead or "Y" can more effectively serve the circulation needs of this specific location, resulting in enhancement to the overall development by providing added amenities, landscaping, and open space while still providing adequate room for fire trucks to maneuver safely in the proposed location. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable as the proposed residential project has higher density and the design is more compact. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on June 4, 2018, 5:30 PM, at the First Haitian Baptist Mission of Naples 14600 Tamiami Trail E. Naples, FL. For further information, please see the NIM Summary information in the backup material. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on August 28, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 15 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 30 9.A.1 Zoning Division staff recommends the CCPC forward petition PUDZ-PL20170001733 Regal Acres rezone and amendment to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, with the exception of Deviation Request #3 and; contingent upon approval by the local fire district for Deviations #1 and #5, and, Zoning Division Staff recommends the CCPC forward PUDZ PL20170001733 Regal Acres Affordable Housing Density Bonus Application for Parcel B to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: A) Proposed RPUD Ordinance, Regal Acres B) Proposed Master Plan for Parcel B, Regal Acres C) FLUE Consistency Review D) Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement Regal Acres E) Public Correspondence PUDZ-PL20170001733; Regal Acres Page 16 of 16 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 31 ORDINANCE NO. 18 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005-36, THE REGAL ACRES RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY INCREASING THE PERMISSIBLE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS FROM 184 TO 300; BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 23.15+/- ACRES OF LAND ZONED RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) TO THE REGAL ACRES RPUD; BY REVISING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; BY AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN; ADDING DEVIATIONS; REVISING DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS; BY REMOVING THE DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL A APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005-36 AS AN ATTACHMENT TO THE ORDINANCE AND BY APPROVAL OF AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS FOR THE ADDED 23.15 ACRES THAT WILL GENERATE 46 BONUS UNITS FOR LOW OR MODERATE INCOME RESIDENTS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF GREENWAY ROAD EAST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951), AND NORTH OF U.S. 41, IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 59.90+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20170001733] WHEREAS, Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. represented by Laura DeJohn AICP of Johnson Engineering, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the PUD and change the zoning classification of the additional herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ZONING CLASSIFICATION The zoning classification of approximately 23.15 acres of the herein described real property located in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural Zoning District to the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District and when combined with the existing Regal Acres RPUD [I 7 -CPS -01727/1430115/11120 RegalAcres \ PUDZ-PL20170001733 Pagel of 2 8/20/18 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 32 provides for a 59.90+/- acre project in accordance with the revised PUD Document, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: REMOVAL OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT AS AN ORDINANCE EXHIBIT The Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement for Parcel A attached as an exhibit to Ordinance No. 05-36 is removed as an ordinary exhibit, but remains in full force and effect as a separate document recorded in Official Record Book 5544 Page 779 et sec . of the Public Records of Collier County. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK as , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A — PUD Document [ 17 -CPS -01727/1430115/11120 RegalAcres \ PUDZ-PL20170001733 8/20/18 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Page 2 of 2 ANDY SOLIS, Chairman 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 33 REGAL ACRES RPUD A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN GOVERNING REGAL ACRES, A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DESIGNED PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. PREPARED FOR: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. 11145 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA 34113 PREPARED BY: COASTAL ENGINEERING DiNG !`l1NSU TANTS rum JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2106 South Horseshoe rive 2350 Stanford Court Naples, Florida 34104 34112 Tel. 239 643 232 (239) 334-0046 Fax 239 643 436 (239) 334-3 fi Revised Ame 28,2005 August 2018 StFike4hfeugh is text deleted in is text added 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 34 9.A.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ii LIST OF EXHIBITS Str-ike thfough is text deleted Underline is text added ii Packet Pg. 35 I L v a STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE (D SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION -2-3- 2-3SECTION SECTIONII PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 51 c 0 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL AREAS gbAN1 I ti N J SECTION IV PRESERVE AREAS 14 N o SECTION TV DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 4-016 a SECTION VI DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC 22 Str-ike thfough is text deleted Underline is text added ii Packet Pg. 35 LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT "A" RPUD MASTER PLAN -PARCEL A EXHIBIT "B" RPUD MASTER PLAN - PARCEL B EXHIBIT "C" PARCEL OWNERSHIP 9.A.2 Strike #"ttgk is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 36 9.A.2 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 36-75 +59.9 acres of property in Collier County, as a Residential Planned Unit Development to be known as the Regal Acres RPUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The +59.9 acre property is comprised of two development parcels Development PARCEL A is +36.75 acres approved by Ordinance #05-36. Development PARCEL B is +23.15 acres. The residential facilities of the Regal Acres RPUD will be consistent with the objectives and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) for the following reasons: The subject property's location in relation to existing or proposed community facilities and services permits the development's residential density as described in Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element. 2. The project development is compatible and complimentary to surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element. 3. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. 4. The project development is planned to protect the functioning of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in Objective 4-.5 of the Dr-einage Stormwater Management Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element. 5. The project is located within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, on the Future Land Use Map. The project is designated as an Affordable Housing Density Bonus project. The Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreements for PARCEL A and PARCEL B are is -e companion documents to this RPUD document. The projected density of 5.00 dwelling units per acre across the total RPUD area of +59.9 acres is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan based on the following relationships to required criteria: Affordable Housing Proiect Within the Urban Residential Subdistrict Base Density 4 dwelling units/acre Traffic Congestion Area -1 dwelling units/acre Affordable Housing Density Bonus +2 dwelling units/acre Maximum Permitted Density 5 dwelling units/acre Requested gross density = 5.0 dwelling units/acre Maximum permitted units = 36.75 acres x 5 dwelling units/acre = 184 units Requested dwelling units = 184 1 &F4Ee-tl+reugh is text delete( Underline is text adder Packet Pg. 37 9.A.2 Affordable Housing Project Within the Urban Residential Subdistrict Base Density 4 dwelling units/acre Coastal High Hazard Area -1 dwelling units/acre Affordable Housing Density Bonus +2 dwlin ni s/aster Maximum Permitted Densi 5dwelling units/acre Requested gross density = 5.0 dwelling units/acre Maximum permitted units = 23.15 acres x 5 dwelling units/acre = 116 units Requested dwelling units = 116 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS FOR PARCEL A & PARCEL B = 300 units 6. In accordance with the Land Development Code and the Impact Fee Ordinance, the purchasers of the subject homes in PARCEL A shall qualify as low-income buyers nn the purchasers of the subject homes in PARCEL B shall qualify as low or moderate - income buyers. All final local development orders for this project are subject to Section 6.02.00, Adequate Public Facilities requirements, of the Collier County LDC. 2 Stfike thfeugh is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 38 9.A.2 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of the Regal Acres RPUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION — PARCEL A The +59.9 acre property is comprised of two development parcels PARCEL A is +36.75 acres approved by Ordinance # 05-36 and the legal description is as follows: THAT PART OF THOSE LANDS AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1689 AT PAGE 832 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 12, N00°1 1'20"E, 2,743.15 FEET TO THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 12, N00°27'50"E 894.35 FEET FOR A PLACE OF BEGINNING; THENCE N89°56'55"W 1,361.53 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE N00°34'06"E 490.98 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE S89°5655"E 1,360.64 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 12 S00°27'52"W 490.97 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING; BEING IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINS 15.34 ACRES MORE OR LESS. LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2052 AT PAGE 812 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 12, N00°11'20"E, 2,743.15 FEET TO THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 12, N00°27'50"E 894.35 FEET FOR A PLACE OF BEGINNING; THENCE N89°56'55"W 443.00 FEET; THENCE N00°34'06"E 490.97 FEET; THENCE S89°56'55"E 443.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 12 S00°27'50"W 490.98 FEET, TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. BEING IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 3 - Strike r-eugT is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 39 9.A.2 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINS 5 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS. AN EASEMENT FOR UTILITIES AND FOR ROADWAY INGRESS AND EGRESS IS RESERVED OVER AND THROUGH THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET OF THIS PROPERTY BY THE GRANTEES, THEIR HEIRS AND ASSIGNS IN PERPETUITY. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD. AND TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTH HALF (S-1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE -1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NW -1/4) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (LESS THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET THEREOF) AND THE SOUTH HALF (S-1/2) OF THE SOUTH HALF (S-1/2) OF THE NORTH HALF (N-1 /2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE -1 /4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE -1/4) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (LESS THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET THEREOF) CONTAINS 26.41 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION — PARCEL B The +59.9 acre property is comprised of two development parcels PARCEL B is +23.15 acres, and the legal description is as follows: PARCEL No 00737760008 & 00741080606 (ORB 3959. PG 35811 THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12 TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH RANGE 26 EAST. Fk TM THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF WHICH IS RESERVED FOR PURPOSES AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12 TOWNSHIP 51 SUu rti. RANGE 26 EAST EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL No 00738280008 (ORB 4467. PG 13971 NORTH 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 114 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TRACT 51 SOUTH RANGE 26 E PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY TAX DEED OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 875 PAGE_ 445 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER Co 1 Y. FLORIDA TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL No 00737720006 (ORB 5083. PG 6571 THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NO 1/4 OF SECTION 12 TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH RANGE 26 EAST CONTAINING TEN (10) 4 Stere-thFeuo is text deleted Tind dine is text added Packet Pg. 40 9.A.2 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL - PARCEL No. 00741100104 RB 5441, PG 18501 PER TITLE COMMITMENTI Q THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 (NE 1/4) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPTION THAT PORTION LYING IN THE WEST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 c ALSO BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE EAST 1,0 18 64 FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE N NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. a co to 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP — 00 • o NTNaples, ---t�, _,-',"L--«-d-___r__.+____ ___AG Tami_ T«;1~�� av«:uu ✓Aaa✓. 00 - Beul@isffi.�_—:'W9l.4h, �NapjFier—WA U101- A #e all ient haye 1 eeff C� Fr-ey will denate his peftien of the subjeet property to HabitM for- Humanity e f� granted, C •• 0 The ownership of PARCEL A and PARCEL B is provided in Exhibit C. y 0 a 0 L 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA a A. The subject property is located on the west side of Greenway Road, approximately 3'/z miles east of Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) and approximately one mile north of U.S.41. M Q B. to D. PARCEL A is zoned RPUD pursuant to Ordinance # 05-36 PARCEL B is zoned Rural Agriculture (A) and is proposed to be rezoned RPUD. M a 1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A The project site is primarily located within the Coastal Drainage Basin according to the Collier County Drainage Atlas. Stefm wa4er- mfieg from the proposed home sites and feadwayswill be Stfike0mugh is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 41 9.A.2 lakes will disehafge te the eanal to the west side of the pr-epert), as mandeAed by the GeHf4y-. The average ground elevation is 6.0 NGVD. The water management system of the project will consist of a perimeter berm with crest elevation facilities set at or above the 25 -year, 3 -day peak flood stage. Water quality pretreatment will be accomplished in eensist of an on-site lakes and landscape buffe areas. The WeAOF ffiaRagOfflOHt system will be pefmi#ed by Collier- Geunty. All rules and regulations treatment, and wetland hydr-elegy maintenanee. The surface water management system for PARCEL A is permitted through the South Florida Water Management District under Environmental Resource Permit No 11 -03 051 and includes two wet detention lakes discharging to the Collier County Canal System at the Greenway Road swale. PARCEL B Stormwater runoff will be collected by a series of swales and inlets and directed to a proposed water management lake which will be connected to the PARCEL A lake system The outfall location for the RPUD will remain unchanged but the outfall structure will be modified to accommodate the new flows Due to the interconnected nature of the project the minimum road and finished floor elevations in PARCEL A and PARCEL B are anticipated to be th same. The system's lakes will provide the detention volume required to meet the South Florida Water Management District's treatment and attenuation requirements The system will attenuate the runoff from PARCEL B to the allowable discharge rate of 24 csm (cubic feet per second per square mile) for Belle Meade in the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances According to the Collier County Soil Survey prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS), four soil map units are present on the RPUD site. These common soils are #2 Holopaw fine sand, limestone substratum, #3 Malabar fine sand, #20 Fort drum and Malabar high fine sands, and #27 Holopaw fine sand. 1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Regal Acres RPUD is an approximately 59.9 acre project comprised of development parcels delineated in the PUD Master Plan as PARCEL A and PARCEL B. PARCEL A is approximately_ 36 75 acres and is built -out with 184 multi -family dwelling units accessory recreational facilities and supportive infrastructure Strip is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 42 1.7 9.A.2 Site Data -PARCEL A ACRES PERCENT Infrastructure and Roads 2.41 6.6 Residential Roof & Driveway 9.50 25.8 Lakes 5.63 15.3 Flood Plain Compensation 2.98 8.1 Residential Open Space 9.91 27.0 Other Open Space 6.32 17.2 TOTAL PARCEL A ACREAGE 36.75+ 100.0 PARCEL B is approximately 23 15 acres and will develop as a residential community with a maximum of 116 dwelling units, accessory common recreation space, preserve& pathways, and supportive infrastructure.0-i units -Ar-e inteaded to be developed as a duplex pr-ejeet. This is an affefdable housing pr-ejeet and an Aff-ord-able Housing Density Beaus Agr-eemefft i ion Site Data — PARCELB Data is approximate and subject to change. ACRES P .R . NT Infrastructure and Roads including 2-7-7 1 Residential Roof & Driveways /Parkina "2$ 14.2 Lake L 44 41 Preserve 5,6_2 24. Residential Open Space (minimuml 2.02 $7 Other common Oven Space &46 3-6-5 PARCEL B ACREAGE 23.15+ 100.0 A ehildr-en's playground/let let afea will be pr-evided pr-ier- te, but fiet Wer- than, when eei4ifiee4es of ersetipane.), are issued for- 0 ,,'e aft-heunits for- this pr-ejeet. WIN ON -7 1 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development." Z Str-ikedwe*gh is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 43 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE 9.A.2 The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the project, as well as other project relationships. 2.2 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of the Regal Acres RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Document, RPUD - Residential Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County LDC and GMP in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorizes the construction of improvements, such as, but not limited to final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit and preliminary work authorization. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. B . Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County LDC in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the Regal Acres RPUD shall become part of the regulations which govern the manner in which the RPUD site may be developed. D. All applicable regulations unless specifically waived through a variance or separate provision provided for in this RPUD Document, shall remain in full force and effect. E. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Section 6.02.01, Adequate Public Facilities requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code. 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DENSITY OR INTENSITY OF LAND USES The Regal Acres RPUD consists of 59.9 acres with a proposed maximum of 300 dwelling units (5 dwelling units per acre). As further described below. PARCEL A consists of +36.75 acre and is previously approved by Ordinance #05-36 for a maximum of 184 affordable residential dwelling units (5 dwelling units per acre). PARCEL B is +23.15 acres proposed for a maximum of 116 affordable residential dwelling units (5 dwelling units per acre) Strike dir-eugh is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 44 9.A.2 P R RLA ma*im m PARCEL A has a maximum of 184 affordable, residential dwelling units &ball be eenstfuet in the residential areas e€the pfejeec The gross project area for PARCEL A is 36.75± acres. The gross project density shall e is a maximum of 5.0 units per acre. All of the maximum 184 units must be are developed in accordance with the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement adopted by Collier County at the same public hearing as paft e€ the PUD rezone approval. if for- any reason a&fdable hetising tinits afe fiat pfevided fef this pfejeetj density shall be lifnited te Of 110 t1flitS. PARCEL B A maximum of 116 affordable residential dwelling units shall be constructed on PARCEL B. The gross project area for PARCEL B is 23.15± acres. The gross proiect density shall be a maximum of 5.0 units per acre All of the maximum 116 units must be developed in accordance with the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement adopted by Collier County at the same public hearing as the PUD rezone approval. If for any reason affordable housing units are not provided on PARCEL B density shall be limited to a maximum of 69 units on PARCEL B- 2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS A. The general configurations of the land uses are illustrated graphically on Exhibits "A" an , RPUD Master Plan, which constitutes the required RPUD Development Plan. Any division of the property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the RPUD Master Plan, the Subdivision section of the Collier County Land Development Code, and the platting laws of the State of Florida. B . The provisions of Section 10.02.03 of the Collier County LDC, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided in said Section. C. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructural improvements regarding any dedications to Collier County and the methodology for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. D A portion of the lots which will be platted in PARCEL B may extend into PARCEL A as shown by the Overlap Area on the Master Plan. If this overlap occurs, the replat of Tract C-1 of the Regal Acres subdivision recorded in Plat Book 49 Page 87 shall be approved and recorded prior to the recording of the plat of the applicable PARCEL B lots The PARCEL B development standards will apply to those platted lots that extend into the Overlay 2.5 MODEL UNITS AND SALES FACILITIES A. In conjunction with the promotion of the development, residential units may be designated as models. Such model units shall be governed by Section 5.04.04 of the M &fife is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 45 LDC. B. Temporary sales trailers and construction trailers may be placed on the site after site development plan approval and prior to the recording of subdivision plats, subject to the requirements of Section 5.04.03 of the LDC. 2.6 PROVISION FOR OFF-SITE REMOVAL OF EARTHEN MATERIAL The excavation of earthen material and it's stock -piling in preparation of water management facilities, or to otherwise develop water bodies, is hereby permitted. Off-site disposal is also hereby permitted subject to the following conditions: A. Excavation activities shall comply with the definition of a "development excavation" pursuant to the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, whereby off-site removal shall be limited to 10% of the total volume excavated but not to exceed 20,000 cubic yards. B. All other provisions of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances shall apply. M 9.A.2 StAk�� is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 46 9.A.2 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL AREAS PLAN 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the Residential Areas as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", RPUD Master Plan. 3.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS The maximum number of residential dwelling units within the RPUD shall be 4$4 300 units. A maximum of 184 dwelling units are permitted within PARCEL A, and a maximum of 116 dwelling units are permitted within PARCEL B 3.3 PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. PARCEL A Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Two-family dwellings units. B. PARCEL A Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: 1. Customary accessory uses and structures including carports, garages, and utility buildings. 2. Recreational uses and facilities including swimming pools, tennis courts, volleyball courts, fishing docks, walking paths, tot lots, picnic areas, recreation buildings, basketball/shuffle board courts, and similar uses. 3. Manager residence and office, temporary sales trailer, and model units. 4. Essential services as defined in Section 2.01.03 of the LDC, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities. C PARCEL B Permitted Principal Uses and Structures - I Single family detached dwelling units. 2 Zero lot line, detached dwelling units. 3. Two-family and duplex dwelling units, 94fike thfeagh is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 47 3.4 9.A.2 4 Attached dwelling units (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residencel. 5 Multiple -family dwelling units. 6 Any other_ principal and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Hearing Examiner pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDCI. D PARCEL B Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: a a 1 Fences and walls. 2 On-site sigma 3 Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land tract including swimming pools spas screen enclosures, private c garages and recreational uses o 4 Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable to the o foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Hearing Examiner pursuant to the J process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). a = N E PARCEL B Permitted General Uses and Structures; a 1 Streets alleys water management facilities and structures utilities and other infrastructure improvements are generally permitted anywhere within this RPUD � except for in the Preserve Area. co 2. Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD: including clubhouses. health CO and fitness facilities pools meeting rooms community buildings. boardwalks. 00 playgrounds playfields tennis courts and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests. v 3 Gatehouses and other access control structures c 4 Mail kiosks. 5 Any other related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the 0 Board of Zoning Appeals of Hearing Examiner pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDCI. 0 0.0 L a DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS a M A. Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within PARCEL A of the Regal a Acres RPUD. Front yard setbacks in Table I shall be measured as follows: c d 1. Corner lots shall be considered as having only one front yard for the purpose M designating front and side yard setbacks. Front yard shall be designated as 2 - of the side with the garage. The other front yard shall be considered as the side a yard. &•rilEe-tteagis text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 48 TABLE I — PAR A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STANDARDS TWO FAMILY DWELLING LOTS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 25' Minimum Lot Area 3,750 Sq. Ft. Minimum Lot Width 35 'Interior Lots 12.5' (Principal Structures) 35' Corner Lots Interior 7.5' 25' Cul de sac 7.5' Minimum Front Yard Setback (1) 25' (Principal Structures) 25' Minimum Side Yard Setback (2) 7.5' (Principal Structures) 7.5' Interior Common Wall 0' (Principal Structures) Minimum Distance Between Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20' (Principal Structures) 10' Comer Lot Minimum Front Yard Setback 25' (Principal Structures) 25' Minimum Side Yard Setback Abutting Roadway 12.5' (Principal Structures) 12.5' Interior 7.5' (Principal Structures) 7.5' Minimum Rear Yard Setback 20' (Principal Structures) 10' Minimum Lake Setback (3) 20' (Principal Structures) 20' Minimum Distance Between 15' (Principal Structures) 15' Structures Maximum Number of Stories: 2 (Principal Structures) 1 Maximum Height: 35' (Principal Structures) 20'(4) Minimum Floor Area 1,050 Sq. Ft. Nntac• (1) Garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk, except for side load garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth shall be provided to avoid vehicles from being parked across a portion or all of the referenced sidewalk. (2) Where fee simple lots are created for each dwelling unit, side yards are measured from the outside wall of the principal structure. (3) Lake setbacks are measured from the control elevation established for the lake. (4) 20 feet except for screen enclosure structures, which may be the same height as the principal structure, but in no event greater than 35 feet. 12 9.A.2 Stfik�� is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 49 9.A.2 ComerB. TabIQ 11 sgAs forth the develQpn= standards for land uses within PARCEL B 6�_i Regal Acres RPUD. F—ron lyxAsetbacks in Table I shall be measured as follows: • be • •' "• as having • one front yard forthe • •• yard.Qf &sioiting firmt and si& yard setbacks. Fr= yard shall be desig=ed as - the side with the garam The W�r &Qntyard shall be considered as th�i TABLE 11 – PARCEL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SEA: Single Family Attached IJ)JE- 1-,ake Maintenan(,,��n • • • 1. Front yard setbacks shall be measured from ROW line and shall allow a 2- foot seum"n from the from the structure to the Public Utility�� 2. Alley setbg&k shall be measured from easement line. Parking may be accesod frQm gUys at thQ rear of thQ pruraly DrQyidQd thprQ is a 5 -foot clearanQQ frQm the vehicle to the edge of payment. Stfike-threegk is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 50 00 0 N Co 0 d v c C E O d O Q O L Q t v to a c d E t v r r Q SINGU FAMILY DF.TACHF.D SiN(a.F. EAMILJL ATTACHRD MiTT_TI- FAMILY RRCRF,ATION ant- ZERO LOT AREA and TOWNHOiJSF. LINE PRINCIPAL STRiJCTiJRF.S Minimum Lot Area 900 sf 1,000n' NIA Minimum Lot Width L NLA Minimum Floor r ni 1.000 Sf NLS! Min, Front Yard Setback (1) 12_ 12' 12L 1Y— Min. Side Yard Setback L 7T.T.: 0' and 0' or 5' for end units '/2 sum ofbuildine 1� Min Rear Yard Setback (21 along an alley 5'. or 20' along 10' from perimeter. 10' from an�1Le ralong,llperimaeL Min Distance Between Structure and Lake 2SZ 29_ 2Q 2Q'_ Min Distance Between Structure and Preserve 2L 2L 2.L 2.L Min. Distance Between Structures EL 14 '/'/ sum ¢ NLA hgiRW Max, Zoned Buildina-HeigIA 35� 3L 2L Max, Actual H ' 4-T 4S1' 42 ACCESSORY STRUCTIJRRS Min, Front Yard Setback SPS SPS SPS 1Q Min Side Y rd Setback s2s SPS SPS SPS Min Rear Yard Setback L L L Min. Lake Setback s2s SPS SPS SPS Min, Preserve Setback IDL Maximum BuildinzEdght SPS SPS SPS SPS SEA: Single Family Attached IJ)JE- 1-,ake Maintenan(,,��n • • • 1. Front yard setbacks shall be measured from ROW line and shall allow a 2- foot seum"n from the from the structure to the Public Utility�� 2. Alley setbg&k shall be measured from easement line. Parking may be accesod frQm gUys at thQ rear of thQ pruraly DrQyidQd thprQ is a 5 -foot clearanQQ frQm the vehicle to the edge of payment. Stfike-threegk is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 50 00 0 N Co 0 d v c C E O d O Q O L Q t v to a c d E t v r r Q C. Except as provided for herein all criteria set forth in Tables I and II shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines or between structures. Condominium. and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standard& D. Landscape buffers and lake maintenance easements shall be platted as separate tracts at time of subdivisionl�pproval. E. Off -Street Parking and Loading Requirements: Parking shall be as required by Section 4.05.00 of the LDC in effect at the time of building permit application. F Open Space Requirements: A minimum of sixty (60) percent open space, as described in Section 4.02.01.B. 1 of the LDC, shall be provided on-site for any residential project. D�� Landscaping and Buffering Requirements: Landscaping and buffering shall be provided peFpursuant to Section 4.06.00 of the Collier County LDC. Where preserves are used to satisfy buffer requirements, they may be supplemented with native plant material pursuant to LDC section 3 05 07 l H Architectural Standards All buildings, lighting, signage, landscaping and visible architectural infrastructure shall be architecturally and aesthetically unified in PARCEL A and in PARCEL B. Said unified architectural theme shall include: a similar architectural design and use of similar materials and colors throughout all of the buildings, signs, and fences/walls to be erected en all ze sujeet parcels. Landscaping and streetscape materials shall also be similar in design throughout PARCEL A and throughout PARCEL -the-subject si . P�I Suns Signs shall be permitted as described within Section 5.06.00 of the Collier County LDC. 14 9.A.2 Strife thFOUgh is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 51 9.A.2 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific develo ment standards for the Preserve Are as shown on Exhibit "B" RPUD Master Plan. 4.2 PERMITTED USES A Principal Use: Preserve B Accessory Uses: All uses allowed in County required preserves in accordance with LDC Section 3 05 07 H.l.h. v 00 r O N Co O d V C fC C E L O 0 Q 0 L IL Q v Y r a E r r a 15 84rike-ihettgh is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 52 9.A.2 SECTION FV V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the commitments for the development of this project. 5.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with final site development plans, final subdivision plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this RPUD, in effect at the time of final plat, final site development plan approval or building permit application as the case may be. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the County LDC shall apply to this project even if the land within the RPUD is not to be platted. The developer, his successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this document. Which commitments will be enforced through provisions agreed to be included in the declaration of covenants and restrictions, or similar recorded instrument. Such provisions must be enforceable by lot owners against the developer, its successors, and assigns, until of turnover of the property to any property or homeowners' association. The developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the RPUD Master Plan and the regulations of this RPUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in title or assignee is subject to the commitments within this Agreement. Pursuant to the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances and the LDC as it relates to the discovery or accidental disturbance of historical/archaeological site and properties during construction. If any significant historical or archaeological artifact is found, work will temporarily cease and the County will be notified in order to take the necessary precautions to preserve the artifact. An attached, one -car garage shall be constructed per each dwelling unit in PARCEL A. 5.3 RPUD MASTER PLAN A. Exhibits "A" and `B", RPUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed area, utilities, road design, structure sizes and designs, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as final platting or site development plan approval. Subject to the provisions of Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC, amendments may be made from time to time. 16 Q♦-"-�= is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 53 9.A.2 B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project. 5.4 MONITORING REPORT • k722 1110 • • r. _ G passive,�Feafiefi -Ail! be sueh s, Mdng. A ehildfeWO O r O i��J ��l'• l � t�.�_ �'l_1 �i�l �l•. _ 1• F OWITMUNJO 171M • _1 r. FM MMMMIR ••• • Y_ • k722 1110 • • r. _ G passive,�Feafiefi -Ail! be sueh s, Mdng. A ehildfeWO O r O i��J ��l'• l � t�.�_ �'l_1 �i�l �l•. _ 1• F OWITMUNJO 171M • _1 !• -! • •" .!1_• '�! • '•. .�_. �J1 • •.lel �_i• :_I" �. • • • ••- - •` L _ • IJI_ !! IT =111 JROI 1 U_�_1 1_ • , • U ._I e.� , 1 • • _ . IT M -MIM .� • , 1• •l.•' �1• _ • _ • ! I••l • • ! 1. .. _•1"1 • • �� • 11 11 111 " 1 mike-threeo is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 54 9.A.2 • _ •. \ �„u • r_RmprMurr M. 5.5-7 UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and. maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 01-57, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. B. A 40 -foot by 60 -foot Cpmty Utilit�=�� for a well site will be dedicatedAQ Collier Cow-ty and the Collier County W atu—Sewer District subject to gDng�=ation for fair market value of the land or equivalent imi2act fee credit mimu= to Code -Qf Ordinance Section1 of plat or - •• permitting,00 conveyance will be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, The locali cm co indicated on the RPUD Master Plan is apprax -Qy CD ir—nale and subject to gbwge yr ided it will be •_ •• . of 111 feet from the existing Nap -les Within •1�. • • •- • • • •• - • the residential land uses within this RPUD with a visual barrier that exceeds 801/o 0 opacity at the time of instaUadm • 5. •. TRAFFIC _ffi, pm,ew&nt nAw4dfigs and designbe \ _of TTanspei4afienIN\ Y 6,1 L, etuTent edition,_DOTFDOT Designedkien, and the Mm" - O,_ Deviees 1MI• \ \- I \ ia Stere -through is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 55 9.A.2 A The Regal Acres development is hart of the US 41 Developers Consortium for the US 1 widening and intersection improvements .�jf 41 intersection as referenced in the TIS provided _ of rezone. Pursuant . A The Regal Acres development is hart of the US 41 Developers Consortium for the US 1 widening and intersection improvements at the CR 951 and US 41 intersection as referenced in the TIS provided at the time of rezone. Pursuant to the Developer ution Agreement (OR 4408 PG 2880)improvements consisted of improvements at the intersection of CR 951 and US 41 six -lane road improvements from the intersection of CR 951 and US 41 to Henderson Creek and four -lane road improvements from Henderson Creek to 0.25 miles east of Naples Reserve Blvd Pursuant to the Impact Fee and Anticipated Advancement of Road Impact Fee table included in the Developer Contribution Agreement road impact fees in the amount of $1_,445,967 60 has been paid for the existing Regal Acres 184 -unit subdivision (PARCEL Al and $471 511.20 has been paid for 60 of the 116 additional dwelling units associated with proposed PARCEL B development. G All pfoposed median opening leeations shall be in aeeefdanee with th ollief Getinty 7 as it fflay be 7 and the , as it may be amended. Collief County r-eserves the fight to fnedify ef elose any median , I, B The Regal Acres RPUD shall be limited to a maximum of 241 two-way unadjusted PM Peak Hour trips This is the aggregate of 121 two-way unadjusted PM Peak Hour trips pursuant to the TIS associated with Regal Acres PPL for PARCEL A and 120 two-wav unadjusted PM Peak Hour trips per the TIS associated with PARCEL B rezoning Nething in any devele. I hall vest a right ef aeeess in emeess of a right Wrigh et4 eendifien eA any aeeess point. Neither- will the e*istenee ef a point ef i — . t of egress or- a median opening, nor- the laek ther-eef-, shall be the basis for- my 19 StfiIEe-through is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 56 v 00 0 N Co 0 m c c E L O 0 0. 0 L Q v Y a r 9.A.2 in title L C _All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer and Collier Country shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. D. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County right- of - way or easement, compensating right-of-way, shall be provided without cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement. E. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public right-of-way or easement is determined to be necessary, the cost of such improvement shall be borne by the developer and shall be paid to Collier County before the issuance of the first CO. L. Ne development efdef(s) will be approved by the County ufAil suGh tifne as th development that would be auther-ized by appr-eyaj ef sursh develepment or -der -(s), as- detefmined by the County's Geneur-feney Management System, 5-7-9 PLANNING A. Pursuant to Section 2.03.07.E of the LDC, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. 24 str-ik thfouo is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 57 9.A.2 A.E.PARCEL A consisted s of an old agricultural field with no native vegetation as required by the GMP and LDC. For PARCEL B. a minimum of 25% of the existing viable naturally functional native vegetation onsite shall be retained. The minimum required vegetation is 5.62 acres, which is provided on PARCEL B. B Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC section 4 06 02 and 4.06-05-E-1 N Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. Q C- A management plan for the entire PARCEL B project area shall be submitted in accordance with the reauirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species M including but not limited to Black Bear. and Florida Panther. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the PARCEL B c development. 21 StrilEe-t1}retlgh is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 58 impaet fees in fees, to a mw6mum D �e petitioner- agrees to a),-; and, addition, eenneetion up IL 7 •shall Y r a v E 5.9 AFFORDABLE Read. The shall wer-k with the Gellier- Gettaty Publie Utilities Divi petitiener- fer- hemeewners fer- in 00 provide an installment payment plan affeeted eests exee r maximum 184 units constructed will be owner -occupied units for residents in th_e low O - N CO O d V C fC C L r-suant to Seetion 4.07.06 of the Land Development Gede shall be made fef the f6ture 'ase 0 eleeter-al polling place. 0 0 Q 0 L IL 21 StrilEe-t1}retlgh is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 58 Q , owner -ship of stieh eem7 eluding, but not limited eendeminium , 0 7 •shall Y r a E 5.9 AFFORDABLE HOUSING a r A. As documented in the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement for Parcel A approved on June 28. 2005 in Ord. No. 05-36, the developers agreed that all of the maximum 184 units constructed will be owner -occupied units for residents in th_e low income category (51-60 percent of County median income). 21 StrilEe-t1}retlgh is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 58 9.A.2 B As documented in the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement for Parcel B approved on [date of approval], the developers have aereed that all of the maximum 116 units constructed will be owner -occupied units for residents in the low_ to moderate income category (60-80 percent of County median income]. 22 Stfike thfottgh is text deleted Underline is text added Packet Pg. 59 a 9.A.2 Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6,06.01.N, "Street System Requirements," which call for minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet This request is to allow for a 55 -foot right -of -wav minimum width for a limited section of the private street network, extending for a length of approximately 50 feet and terminating in a hammerhead or Y configuration, provided that the water main will be centrally located in the 10' space between the on -street 12arking and the Right of Way line 1 WAID MAIN 55' ROW CROSS SECTION aro Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5. "On -Premises Directional Signs," which requires n -premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10 feet from edge of roadway, rayed surface or back of curb. This deviation requests a minimum setback of 5 feet from the edge of private roadway/drive aisle. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4 06 OS D 2 a "Trees and Palms" which states that no more than 30% of required canopy trees may be substituted by palms. This deviation requests to increase the allowable substitution of palms to up to 60% of required canopy trees used to satisfy individual residential lot requirements (of LDC section 4.06.05.A.1). Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5,03.02.C, "Fences and Walls" which calls for a maximum fence or wall height of 4 feet and 6 feet in residential components of PUDs. This deviation request=s allowance for a maximum fence or wall height of 8 feet measured from nearest finished floor elevation for buffering along the external PUD boundaries and for protection from the drainage ditch to the south. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 6,06.0 IJ "Dead End Streets" which calls for dead ends stret-gs o terminate in a cul-de-sac This deviation requests the ability to end one of the streetegments within the PUD with a hammerhead or Y configuration as approved by the local Fire District a Strikethr-euis text deleted r TURM Underline is text added Packet Pg. 60 0 z 0 0' J U 0_ z V) w EXHIBIT A PARCEL A - MASTER PIAN EXISTING AGRICULTURAL ZONING 13' lAND6CAPE BufTcn/c & N 8957.27- W 1361.53' SURVEY 475.61' SURVEY N 8956'55' W 1361.53' DEED EXISTING AGRICULTURAL ZONING 9.A.2 N lY a Z w Na` w o L) a o a�F �O Z USX Go J � O N o QD O < E a m C DA Q iy°W �f d ID USE TABLE ci�o� nw C INFRASTRUCTURE\RADS 2.4Al AC 6X % RESIC DENTIAk DRIVEWAY 950 Q. AC 25.8% L. I1 SUBTOTAL = 11.91 AC 32.4% IL LAKES FED PLAIN COMPENSATION = 5.53 AC - 2.98 AC 15.3% &1% RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE = 9.91 AC 27.0% OTHER OPEN SPACE = 6.32 AC 17.2% Z E� ci SUBTOTAL = 24.84 AC 67.6% J TOTAL = 36.75 AC 100.0% 4' F Zpp� S y1 pp Z NUMBER OF UNITS = 184.0 U�;' WZUU vii i f+ DENSITY = 5.0 UNI1S PER ACRE C ILI E a$ a Q e3 S�e „EET 1 6 1 Packet Pg. 61 ... _... GREENWA OAD SECTION UNE O CD VACANT PARCELA O VACANT IR 1 OVERLAP AREA I 15' L.B.E. (TYPE B) I I-- RIGHT-OF-WAY 2 REC I 59.9* I 36.75* AREA 23.15* / 300 D.U. (5 D.U.IAC) I PROPOSEDDLAKE I 1.0 AC R O 22 REQUIRED I PROVIDED PRESERVE 40'.60' I I (\ R R I C.U.E. ` I— A5.62PARCEL 36.PARCEL A PROVIDED RESIDENTIAL I PARCEL B SINGLE FAMILY I R R SIDEWALK TYP) O R 4 .'PRESERVE. . - EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN THE PRESERVE PRESERVE WALL BE USED TO SATISFY THE BUFFER '. REQUIREMENTS. 15' LB.E. (TYPE 'B') O MH RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME PARK O PUD DEVIATION (TYPICAL) 9.A.2 0 62.5 125 250 SECTION LINE (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1'=250') RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY O NATIVE VEGETATION CALCULATIONS THERE WAS NO VEGETATION REQUIREMENT ASSOCIATED WITH PARCEL A NATIVE VEGETATION PARCEL B 22.16 AC 25% PRESERVE REQUIREMENTS 5.62 AC PRESERVE PROVIDED 5.62 AC LAND SUMMARY USE CATEGORY ACREAGE TOTAL SITE AREA 59.9* PARCEL A 36.75* PARCEL 8 23.15* M MUM DWELLING UNITS 300 D.U. (5 D.U.IAC) PARCEL A I GD.U.(SD.U.IAC) PARCEL B 116D.U.(5D.U.IAC) REQUIRED I PROVIDED PRESERVE A (PROVIDED) PARCEL B (PROVIDED) OPEN SPACE REQUIRED A5.62PARCEL 36.PARCEL A PROVIDED 22.PARCEL B PROVIDED 13. LEGEND PRESERVE AREA ® WATERMANAGEMENTAREA PUDBOUNDARY ----RIGHT-0E-WAY PUD ADJACENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION LUC ADJACENT LANG USE o 5' RES 20' IN -10 L.M.E. 40' 20' MIN.:E %' 3 10.8' NAVD 4.1 CONTROL ELEVATION = 4.7' NAVO (WET SEASON WATER TABLE) sJ a, OVERLAP AREA SECTION E%ISTINC UKE TYPICAL RESIDENCEIEXIS7TNG LAKE NOTES 1. THE FA TIES AND wPROVFLENIS SHORN ON MI5 RPUO MASTER PLAN SET SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE 2 ME DESIGN. LO TION. AND CONRGURAl10H OF THE LAND wPROYDACNTS. LOTS/PARCELS, LAKES. AND OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SOP. OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL pp JOHNSON ENGINEERING. INC. REGAL ACRES RPUD f7 2350 STANFORD COURT RPUD MASTER PLAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF `r NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 EXHIBIT B PARCEL B COLLIER COUNTY PFAXE(2}9))33436613 ENGINEERING E.B. /642 R L.B. #642 I-ALE PROECTNG078— 1FI E2-5126 SC2018 0170AS SHOWN B Packet Pg. 62 9.50.2 6- (D M M ti O O O ti r O N J a N 0 IL O O N O O U C (C C E 0 (D 0) 0 Q 0 a d t U R r Q C t V r Q Packet Pg. 63 J f 25' MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK 10' MIN, ACCESSORY SETBACK 4 z s ' FENCE/WALL (POTENTIAL) 7-7 NATIVE PRESERVE AREA SIGN "a I PERIMETER BERM EX. GROUND TYPICAL PRESERVE SECTION �.rs. 12' FRONT YARD 5' SITA K 10' PUE 61' RIGHT-OF-WAY E REAR 5' 2' 2' 9' S' g SETBACK S/W 18' PARKING Vq 20' ROAD PARKING S/W TYPICAL STREET SECTION Kr: � i s � W Z W Z 1- 12' FRONT O ❑ ❑ O 0 O 20' REAR SETBACK YARD SETBACK p10 GREEN SPAC A 18 PARKING 25' ALLEY / ACCESS EASEMENT 18' PARKING 2' i3 g left £ 2' VALLEYGUTTER c15' ROADWAY 8 NOTES TYPICAL ALLEY SECTION 1. THE FACIUTIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS RPUD MASTER PLAN SET SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. f 2. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS, LOTS/PARCELS, LAKES AND OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT 6 EITHER SOP, OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL RPUD MASTER PLAN - PARCEL B HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF�r JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 REGAL ACRES RPUD EXHIBIT B-2 CROSS SECTIONS COLLIER COUNTY PHO0333 AX: (239) 34-3661 OJECT N0. 7 N0. SY NF EET �J� PR170078- ENGINEERING E.B. /642 a LB. /642 1 UNE 2018 2-51-28 AS SHOWN B-2 6- (D M M ti O O O ti r O N J a N 0 IL O O N O O U C (C C E 0 (D 0) 0 Q 0 a d t U R r Q C t V r Q Packet Pg. 63 I SECTION UNE I E 9.A.2 ---- --- GRFEd`d.4.Y ROB0_--- ---------------------------------- I I 0 62.5 125 250 (INTENDED DISPLAY 250' SECTION UNE J PARCEL A m I I I LEGEND I PRESERVE AREA - ® WATER MANAGEMENT AREA -`--` I PUD BOUNDARY i� AREA PUD ADJACENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION e I I LAKE I 1.0 AC LUC ADJACENT LAND USE 1 \ FUTURE SANITARY SEWER m -1 jl MH FUTURE WATER MAIN II RESIDENTIAL PERIMETER BERM MOBILE HOME �i�-� FLOW PARCEL B PARK PRESERVE PROPOSED BOUNDARY UNE NOTES: - PRESERVE 1. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS RPUO MASTER PLAN SET SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. 2. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS, I U D LOTS/PARCELS, LAKES, AND OR ENTRY POINT'S SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SDP, OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. MASTER UTILITY AND DRAINAGE PLAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT REGAL ACRES RPUD PARCEL B COLLIER COUNTY NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PHONE: ONNE((239) 434-03 3 EXHIBIT B-3 ENGINEERINGE.B. 4642 & LB. 4642 OA E FRS Ecr Na E N' A E sN�T JUNE 2018 01]0076-00 12-51-26 AS W. B-3 Packet Pg. 64 PROPOSED ADDITION TO PUD BOUNDARY WEST WIND ESTATES s� 0 75 1®0 (INTENDED DISPIAY SCALE: 1'=300') 9.A.2 JOHNSON ENGINEERING. INC, REGAL ACRES RPUD !� 2350 STANFORD COURT EXISTING AND PROPOSED HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF `r NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 EXHIBIT B-4 33 PUD BOUNDARY COLLIER COUNTY PHONE (2339) 334-3661 E N G I N E E R I N G E.B. x}642 & L.B. #642 DATE PR0 £CT N0 FlLE N0. SCALE $H ET JUNE 2018 0170078-00 12-51-26 AS SHOWN B-4 Packet Pg. 65 9.A.2 REGAL ACRES RPUD— EXHIBIT C Parcel List and Ownership PARCEL A Parcel # OwnerName StreetAddress Purchase Date 69060900026 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 69060900068 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 10325 MAJESTIC CIR 69060900084 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 10351 GREENWAY RD 69060900107 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 69060900149 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 10291 MAJESTIC CIR 69060900165 BOYER,BEAUDELINE 10231 KINGDOM CT 9/30/2010 69060900181 SINEUS, WILLY=& DOMINIQUE 10235 KINGDOMCT 9/30/2010 69060900204 BENAVI DES, JACINTO 10239 KINGDOMCT 10/20/2010 69060900220 EDMOND, IMMACULA 10243 KINGDOM CT 2/23/2011 69060900246 NORVILUS,ROCHEMOND 10247 KINGDOM CT 10/22/2010 69060900262 AUDIGE,CHIMENEA 10251 KINGDOMCT 12/20/2010 69060900288 FORESTAL, MARIE 10255 KINGDOMCT 11/12/2010 69060900301 CHARLES, MENARD 10259 KINGDOM CT 2/23/2011 69060900327 GARCIA, JESUS 10263 KINGDOMCT 12/22/2010 69060900343 NOEL,RICHEMOND 10267 KINGDOMCT 11/29/2010 69060900369 ENAMORADO, RAMON FONSECA 10271 KINGDOM CT 6/20/2016 69060900385 LORCY, BERN ITE 10275 KINGDOMCT 6/21/2011 69060900408 LACOSTE, JEAN B 10279 KINGDOM CT 3/3/2011 69060900424 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CC 10283 KINGDOM CT 5/24/2017 69060900440 PREVILON,JONAS 10287 KING DOM CT 12/11/2015 69060900466 LACROYANCE, CEFRANCILE 10291 KINGDOMCT 12/29/2011 69060900482 CHARELUS, MYRIELLE 10295 KINGDOM CT 6/30/2011 69060900505 JACQUES,CHRICITA 10299 KINGDOM CT 12/2/2011 69060900521 LOU IS, JUDE 10303 KINGDOM CT 6/14/2011 69060900547 THOMAS, MARIE M 10307 KINGDOM CT 6/14/2011 69060900563 PERO,ANDREA N 10311 KINGDOMCT 12/15/2011 69060900589 ALCIUS, JEAN SERGO 10315 KINGDOM CT 4/15/2011 69060900602 JOSEPH, SHAILAJAV 10319 KINGDOMCT 6/15/2011 69060900628 RAMIREZ, WALTER CRUZ 10323 KINGDOM CT 3/18/2011 69060900644 JOSEPH, ADIENS=& MARYSE 10327 KINGDOM CT 4/21/2011 69060900660 NELSON, DAVID 10326 KINGDOMCT 4/8/2011 69060900686 SORIANO, HUGO A 10322 KINGDOM CT 3/17/2011 69060900709 FAIFE, JOSE A RODRIGUEZ 10318 KINGDOMCT 5/9/2011 69060900725 FERNE, ESHEDDLLING 10314 KINGDOM CT 5/10/2011 69060900741 ABRAHAM, KERLANGE 10310 KINGDOM CT 7/14/2011 Regal Acres RPUD - PARCEL A Ownership List January 2018 Page 1of6 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 66 9.A.2 Parcel#t OwnerNarne Street Address Purchase Date 69060900767 ETIENNE, JOSE YOLDA 10306 KING DOM CT 11/11/2011 69060900783 GERMAIN, SYLVIE F 10302 KINGDOM CT 11/15/2011 69060900806 CLEMONS. DONNA L 10298 KINGDOMCT 2/16/2012 69060900822 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 10294 KINGDOMCT 69060900848 EGALITE,GULDINE 10290 KINGDOMCT 2/21/2012 69060900864 LAFONTANT, ALINE 10286 KINGDOM CT 4/26/2012 69060900880 ALVA RADO, IDALIA C 10282 KINGDOM CT 8/16/2012 69060900903 DERVIL,JULIEN 10278 KINGDOM CT 11/15/2012 69060900929 SAINTUS, MARIE D 10274 KINGDOMCT 5/18/2012 69060900945 THERESIAS, JEAN C 10270 KINGDOMCT 4/27/2012 69060900961 GEUS,AMONCIAJEUNE 10266 KINGDOM CT 6/4/2012 69060900987 VIEITES, BLANCA L 10262 KINGDOM CT 6/11/2012 69060901009 SAGESSE, MERASSAINT 10258 KINGDOM CT 5/31/2012 69060901025 JEAN, MARTINE 10254 KINGDOMCT 6/19/2012 69060901041 KEY, K RYSTA L LYNN 10250 KINGDOMCT 5/18/2012 69060901067 MONTES ROMERO, ANTHONY DAVID 10246 KINGDOM CT 5/3/2012 69060901083 DURAN, MANUEL 10249 EMPEROR LN 6/5/2013 69060901106 HERNANDEZ, JESSICA R 10253 EMPEROR LN 6/11/2012 69060901122 PERIERA, SANDRA Y 10257 EMPEROR LN 6/8/2012 69060901148 MELERO, ISABEL LOPEZ 10261 EMPEROR LN 6/16/2017 69060901164 BASTIEN, VIOLINE 10265 EMPEROR LN 6/5/2012 69060901180 BELDOR, YANICK 10269 EMPEROR LN 9/14/2015 69060901203 VIZCAYA, CECILIAAVILA 10273 EMPEROR LN 6/8/2012 69060901229 OLVERA, MELINA 10277 EMPEROR LN 6/11/2012 69060901245 MCDONALD, CLAYDER HIDALGO 10281 EMPEROR LN 6/8/2012 69060901261 SANCHEZ,GEILIS 10285 EMPEROR LN 6/8/2012 69060902600 BUCHHEIT, DIANA LEE 10328 MAJESTICCIR 3/28/2014 69060902626 RICO, MARTIN AVILA 10324 MAJESTIC C I R 3/28/2014 69060902642 WILLIAMCEAU, ELVITA 10320 MAJESTICCIR 3/28/2014 69060902668 ALCIME, MARIO 10316 MAJESTIC CIR 3/28/2014 69060902684 PIERRE, RONALD CHARLES 10312 MAJESTICCIR 11/8/2013 69060902707 CAMIL, BETTY 10308 MAJESTICCIR 11/21/2012 69060902723 DIAZ,ALEJANDRA 10304 MAJESTICCIR 10/23/2013 69060902749 SOLIS, FLORIBERTO 10300 MAJESTICCIR 12/6/2013 69060902765 LOPEZ, VICKY ROSANNA 10296 MAJESTICCIR 6/20/2012 69060902781 ROLLE, JANET 10292 MAJESTICCIR 7/26/2012 69060902804 MORGAN,TONICIA DENISE 10284 EMPEROR LN 6/27/2012 69060902820 DELISCA, MYRTIL 10280 EMPEROR LN 11/22/2013 69060902846 FORTUNA, MARISENA 10276 EMPEROR LN 6/19/2012 69060902862 1 PLANTIN, MAXO 10272 EMPEROR LN 6/19/2012 69060902888 1 INGUNZA, FELIZ 10268 EMPEROR LN 6/29/2017 Regal Acres RPUD - PARCEL A Ownership List j�[�•S m11 January 2018 Page 2of6 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 67 9.A.2 Parcel# OwnerName StreetAddress Purchase Date 69060902901 PIERRE, VILASON 10264 EMPEROR LN 11/22/2010 69060902927 MATOS, MARIBEL 10260 EMPEROR LN 10/15/2010 69060902943 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CC INC 10256 EMPEROR LN 11/20/2017 69060902969 CLERCIRA, SAINNITA 10252 EMPEROR LN 9/30/2010 69060902985 PLANTIN,JUNIOR=&WILSIE 10248 EMPEROR LN 9/30/2010 69060903007 GASPARD, RONALD 10244 EMPEROR LN 10/20/2010 69060903023 PEREZ, MARIA D 10240 EMPEROR LN 9/30/2010 69064000029 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 69064000045 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 69064000061 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 10407 MAJESTICCIR 69064000087 OJISMA,EDAIN 10329 MAJESTIC CIR 6/20/2014 69064000100 GAETAN, MARIE NANJIE 10333 MAJESTIC CIR 6/30/2014 69064000126 LOUIS, LUCRECE PIERRE 10337 MAJESTICCIR 6/27/2014 69064000142 MASSENAT, JEAN F 10341 MAJESTIC CIR 6/27/2014 69064000168 PENA,YENNY 10345 MAJESTICCIR 7/11/2014 69064000184 SOLIS, OSIRIS MEDINA 10349 MAJESTIC CIR 6/30/2014 69064000207 BARROSO, ENRIQUE E DINZA 10353 MAJESTIC CIR 7/9/2014 69064000223 HATCH, SIMONE 10357 MAJESTICCIR 6/30/2014 69064000249 BRIZUELA, ERNESTO 10361 MAJESTICCIR 9/15/2014 69064000265 PRIETO, MIGUELOCEGUERA 10365 MAJESTICCIR 4/28/2015 69064000281 LEANDRE, BOURGEOT 10369 MAJESTICCIR 11/19/2014 69064000304 CANDELARIO, IVELKA 0 10373 MAJESTICCIR 10/30/2014 69064000320 HUTCHINS,DORRELI 10377 MAJESTICCIR 11/25/2014 69064000346 TORRE, ROBERTV 10381 MAJESTICCIR 11/18/2014 69064000362 GERBIER,WOUILNA 10385 MAJESTICCIR 12/12/2014 69064000388 MARSAINVIL, YVENER=& EDILIA 10389 MAJESTICCIR 12/12/2014 69064000401 POULARD,JENNYA 10393 MAJESTICCIR 12/12/2014 69064000427 MON DESIR, GARY 10397 MAJESTICCIR 11/20/2014 69064000443 GAYO, MARLENE 10401 MAJESTICCIR 12/12/2014 69064000469 BAUTISTA-CRUZ, V BENITO 10405 MAJESTICCIR 12/12/2014 69064000485 DAMAS,DIEUNYTHA 10409 MAJESTICCIR 3/20/2015 69064000508 CADET, JACQUELINE 10413 MAJESTICCIR 4/3/2015 69064000524 MARTINEZ, MARGARITA 10417 MAJESTICCIR 4/7/2015 69064000540 LARA, EDIDT M 10421 MAJESTICCIR 3/27/2015 69064000566 SAINTJEAN, MASSILLON 10425 MAJESTICCIR 4/7/2015 69064000582 GONZALEZ, LUIS 10429 MAJESTICCIR 4/8/2015 69064000605 MORALES, MIGUELGOMEZ 10433 MAJESTICCIR 5/15/2015 69064000621 CASIMIR,YVONNE 10437 MAJESTICCIR 4/15/2015 69064000647 ALCE, JEAN J=& MARIE M 10441 MAJESTICCIR 4/8/2015 69064000663 0 RA NTES, VA N ESSA 10445 MAJESTICCIR 5/1/2015 69064000689 CIVIL, ALIX 10449 MAJESTICCIR 4/24/2015 Regal Acres RPUD - PARCEL A Ownership List January 2018 Page 3of6 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 68 Parcel# QwnerName StreetAddress Purchase Date 69064000702 LOU IS, ON EL JN 10453 MAJESTICCIR 6/5/2015 69064000728 OROZCO, JOSE M=& MARIA H 10457 MAJESTIC CIR 5/12/2015 69064000744 VI LLA FU ERTE, JOS E M G U ER RERO 10461 MAJESTICCIR 5/12/2015 69064000760 GARCIA, YSMAEL PEREZ 10465 MAJESTIC CIR 6/15/2015 69064000786 GONZALEZ, MISHAEL 10469 MAJESTICCIR 5/15/2015 690640DoRn9 I NAARTINIP7 icnAAFI r-tz. ❑ncci —1 10501 MAJESTICCIR 69064000825 PRUNIER,JUDE=&JOCELYN 10477 MAJESTICCIR J/LL/LV1J 5/22/2015 69064000841 BOYER,GERLANDE 10481 MAJESTICCIR 6/15/2015 69064000867 GRESSEAU, PIERRE 10485 MAJESTICCIR 6/5/2015 69064000883 LINDOR, COULANGE MARIE 10489 MAJESTICCIR 5/28/2015 69064000906 JONES,ANDREA 10493 MAJESTICCIR 5/15/2015 69064000922 SEVA, JUDITH 10497 MAJESTICCIR 6/19/2015 69064000948 BARKER, TRENTANTHONY 10501 MAJESTICCIR 6/1/2015 69064000964 CIBRIAN, NOH EMI DE JESUS 10505 MAJESTICCIR 7/6/2015 69064000980 AZOR, FLORENCE 10509 MAJESTICCIR 6/15/2015 69064001002 CASTELLAN, JUAN CARLOS 10513 MAJESTICCIR 6/30/2015 69064001028 DIAZ, AG N I ES KA MAYOL 10517 MAJESTICCIR 6/19/2015 69064001044 MATOS, RICARDO GAMEZ 10521 MAJESTIC CIR 6/12/2015 69064001060 TREVINO, RAUL 10525 MAJESTICCIR 6/12/2015 69064001086 ROJO, VIRGINIA LOPEZ DE 10529 MAJESTIC CIR 8/31/2015 69064001109 DIMAS, ADRIAN ASCENCIO 10533 MAJESTICCIR 8/31/2015 69064001125 AUGUSTIN,JIMMY 10537 MAJESTICCIR 8/31/2015 69064001141 ANTOINE,JN DAVID 10541 MAJESTICCIR 8/28/2015 69064001167 CESAR, DIEUSEUL=& ISMELA 10545 MAJESTICCIR 8/31/2015 69064001183 CODIO, LUC 10549 MAJESTICCIR 8/24/2015 69064001206 LOUIMA, MANESE 10553 MAJESTICCIR 8/31/2015 69064001222 PERALTA, DELMIRA A VIDAL 10557 MAJESTICCIR 8/31/2015 69064001248 ROBLES, IVAN A MEDINA 10561 MAJESTICCIR 6/5/2014 69064001264 SARDUY, JUAN E 10565 MAJESTICCIR 6/27/2014 69064001280 PRUDHOMME,EASLANDE 10569 MAJESTICCIR 4/17/2014 69064001303 STVIL, CLAIRMIL 10573 MAJESTICCIR 4/21/2014 69064001329 NAZIEN, QUEENIE WORTH 10577 MAJESTICCIR 4/17/2014 69064001345 LAITIL,GUERDA 10581 MAJESTICCIR 4/17/2014 69064001361 GUZMAN,JESUS G FIGUEROA 10585 MAJESTICCIR 6/20/2014 69064001387 VIZCAYA, ERAS MOAVILA 10589 MAJESTICCIR 5/23/2014 69064001400 SOLORIO,JUAN M 10364 MAJESTICCIR 6/30/2014 69064001426 DIEUJUSTE, MARIE NICOLE 10368 MAJESTICCIR 6/20/2014 69064001442 BONILLA, JESSICA 10372 MAJESTICCIR 12/15/2014 69064001468 MAREUS, MILER 10376 MAJESTICCIR 12/22/2014 69064001484 SALOMON, IDOVY 10380 MAJESTICCIR 12/22/2014 69064001507 ALEXANDRE, SOUZIE RAICHAFFEN 10384 MAJESTICCIR 12/22/2014 Regal Acres RPUD - PARCEL A Ownership List January 2018 Page 4 of 6 ENGINEERING 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 69 rarcein owner Name StreetAddress Purchase Date, 69064001523 COLLAZO,YASNOVYCACERES 10388 MAJESTICCIR 12/22/2014 69064001549 VI LLARD, ANSCE=& AN N ETTE 10396 MAJESTICCIR 12/22/2014 69064001565 69064001581 69064001604 ULYSSE, WILBERTJEAN MARIE GUSTAVE, ROSELINE GELIN,FRIDA 10408 10412 10416 MAJESTICCIR MAJESTICCIR MAJESTICCIR 12/29/2014 12/29/2014 2/27/2015 69064001620 GASPARD, JEAN H 10420 MAJESTICCIR 1/30/2015 69064001646 GONZALEZ, IRIS 10424 MAJESTICCIR 2/27/2015 69064001662 MENDEZ, CARMEN HURTADO 10428 MAJESTICCIR 10/10/2016 69064001688 SAINTCIR, EMALEINE 10432 MAJESTICCIR 3/13/2015 69064001701 MICHEL,JEANVILET 10436 MAJESTICCIR 3/2/2015 69064001727 ORTIZ, CHRISTIANJ RODRIGUEZ 10440 MAJESTICCIR 3/20/2015 69064001743 GRIFF, DOUGLAS L=& SARA C 10444 MAJESTIC CIR 4/6/2015 69064001769 DAVIS, ERICAKA ANDREA 10448 MAJESTICCIR 3/20/2015 69064001785 GONZALEZ, CARLA E ANDRADE 10452 MAJESTICCIR 4/6/2015 69064001808 REYES, YURIDIA RAMIREZ 10484 MAJESTICCIR 6/19/2014 69064001824 SANTOS, FERNANDO FUENTES 10488 MAJESTICCIR 6/19/2015 69064001840 RODRIGUEZ,GEISY 10492 MAJESTICCIR 6/12/2015 69064001866 MEJIAS, RAULASUAREZ 10496 MAJESTICCIR 6/12/2015 69064001882 SEVILA, WILLIAN OCHOA 10500 MAJESTICCIR 6/29/2015 69064001905 BEAUPLAN, ELIPHEN 10504 MAJESTICCIR 6/30/2015 69064001921 HERNANDEZ, ZYNNIA E 10508 MAJESTICCIR 6/30/2015 69064001947 MEJIA, FR EDCASTILLO 10512 MAJESTICCIR 6/30/2015 69064001963 HILL, ROSE M 10544 MAJESTIC CIR 6/30/2015 69064001989 CORDEIRO, ASHLEY M 10548 MAJESTICCIR 6/30/2015 69064002001 ARCAS, DOHANNYS L=&ALINA 10552 MAJESTICCIR 7/13/2015 69064002027 HERNANDEZ, ARTURO PINA 10556 MAJESTICCIR 7/31/2015 69064002043 GALDAMEZ, ZONIA P JANDRES 10560 MAJESTICCIR 5/23/2014 69064002069 SENDEJAS,JAVIER=& MARIA M 10564 MAJESTICCIR 5/23/2014 69064002085 JOSEPH, MIREILLE 10568 MAJESTICCIR 6/6/2014 69064002108 DEMOSTHENES, MANOUCHECA 10572 MAJESTICCIR 5/23/2014 69064002124 PERRIER, ROSE LAURE 10576 MAJESTICCIR 6/27/2014 69064002140 METELUS, MICHELOT 10580 MAJESTICCIR 6/23/2014 69064002166 PADRON, DENIS 10584 MAJESTICCIR 6/5/2014 69064002182 1 JASMIN, BRASELYE=&JACQUELINE 10588 MAJESTICCIR 6/27/2014 Regal Acres RPUD - PARCEL A Ownership List January 2018 Page 5 of 6 ENGINEERING 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 70 I REGAL ACRES RPUD — EXHIBIT C Parcel List and Ownership PARCEL B Parcel# Owner Name Street Address Purchase Date 00737720006 G H U, LLC Ronald Monachino 8654 Camelot Dr 09/10/2014 Newell Creek, LLC Chesterland, OH 44026 00741100104 Habitat for Humanity 11145 Tamiami Trail East 10/18/2017 Naples, FL 34113 00737760008 Habitat for Humanity 11145 Tamiami Trail East 12/26/2005 Naples, FL34113 00741080606 Habitat for Humanity 11145 Tamiami Trail East 12/26/2005 Naples, FL 34113 00738280008 Habitat for Humanity 11145 Tamiami Trail East 07/20/2017 Naples, FL 34113 Regal Acres RPUD PARCEL B Ownership List January 2018 Page 6 of 6 ENGINEERING 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 71 W v co 0 0 N 0 0 d V C R C E L 0 d 0 Q 0 L d a E M a a GREENWAY ROAD SECTION UNE O VACANT PARCEL A E f-5 O VACANT IR O OVERLAP AREA - r _ 15' L.B.E. RIGHT-OF-WAY 2 REC (TYPE 'B') AREA r \Y o PROPOSED AOKE AC R �2 o C UXE.O I 1 R �\ R RESIDENTIAL — PARCEL B SINGLE FAMILY I � � � / UD R R __�_/ SIDEWALK TYP) R 3O 4 4 PRESERVE, EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN THE PRESERVE PRESERVE HALL BE USED TO SATISFY THE BUFFER o REQUIREMENTS. UD IM 15' L.B.E. (TYPE 'B') O MH RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME PARK O PUD DEVIATION (TYPICAL) 9.A.3 27 — —� SECTION LINE 0 62.5 125 250 (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1"=250') RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY O NATIVE VEGETATION CALCULATIONS THERE WAS NO VEGETATION REQUIREMENT ASSOCIATED WITH PARCEL A NATIVE VEGETATION PARCEL B 22.46 AC 25% PRESERVE REQUIREMENTS 5.62 AC PRESERVE PROVIDED 5.62 AC LAND SUMMARY USE CATEGORY ACREAGE TOTAL SITE AREA 59.9± PARCEL A 36.75± PARCEL B 23.15± MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 300D.U.(5D.U./AC) PARCEL A 184 D.U. (5 D.U. l AC) PARCEL B 116 D.U. (5 D.U. l AC) REQUIRED I PROVIDED PRESERVE 5.62 PARCEL A (PROVIDED) N/A PARCEL B (PROVIDED) 5.62 OPEN SPACE REQUIRED 36.0 (60%) PARCEL A PROVIDED 22.05 (60%) PARCEL B PROVIDED 13.89 (607) 5'p ARIES 20' IN 0'-10' L.M.E. 40' 20' MIN. FFE VARIES 10.8' NAVID CONTROL ELEVATION = 4.7' NAVD (WET SEASON WATER TABLE) ?'r OVERLAP AREA SECTION EXISTING LAKE TYPICAL FLESIDENCI:/EXISTING LAKE NOTES: 1. THE FACIUTIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS RPUD MASTER PLAN SET SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. 2. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS, LOTS/PARCELS, LAKES, AND OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SDP, OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. REGAL ACRES RPUD 2350 STANFORD COURT RPUD MASTER PLAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF t/ NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 EXHIBIT B PARCEL B COLLIER COUNTY PHONE: ONE((2s (239)434-0333 ENGINEERING E.B. 'j 42 & L.B. 642 DATE PROJECT N0 FILE N0 SCALE SHEET JUNE 2018 01700780- 12-51-26 AS SHOWN B LEGEND PRESERVE AREA ® WATER MANAGEMENT AREA PUD BOUNDARY - RIGHT -OF -WAV PUD ADJACENTZONINGCLASSIFICATION LUC ADJACENT LAND USE 5'p ARIES 20' IN 0'-10' L.M.E. 40' 20' MIN. FFE VARIES 10.8' NAVID CONTROL ELEVATION = 4.7' NAVD (WET SEASON WATER TABLE) ?'r OVERLAP AREA SECTION EXISTING LAKE TYPICAL FLESIDENCI:/EXISTING LAKE NOTES: 1. THE FACIUTIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS RPUD MASTER PLAN SET SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. 2. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS, LOTS/PARCELS, LAKES, AND OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SDP, OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. REGAL ACRES RPUD 2350 STANFORD COURT RPUD MASTER PLAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF t/ NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 EXHIBIT B PARCEL B COLLIER COUNTY PHONE: ONE((2s (239)434-0333 ENGINEERING E.B. 'j 42 & L.B. 642 DATE PROJECT N0 FILE N0 SCALE SHEET JUNE 2018 01700780- 12-51-26 AS SHOWN B 9.A.4 Co e r Gau 1ty Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division Date: May 10, 2018 Subject: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ - PL20170001733 (REV: 3) PETITION NAME: Regal Acres REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting to rezone 23.15 acres from the A, Rural Agricultural zoning district to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district, Regal Acres RPUD (Parcel B), to allow a maximum of 116 residential dwelling units (DUs) on Parcel B; and consideration and approval of an affordable housing density bonus agreement authorizing the developer to utilize affordable housing bonus density units in the development of this project. Ordinance #05-36, established the existing 36.75 -acre Regal Acres RPUD (Parcel A), an affordable housing development with the original 184 residential dwelling units of Regal Acres RPUD. The total acreage (Parcel A and Parcel B development for the Regal Acres RPUD is proposed to be ±59.9 acres (23.15a + 36.75a = 59.5 acres) with a maximum total of 300 residential dwelling units. Submittal 2 reflects that 25% of native vegetation preserve is of 22.46 acres not of 23.15 acres on Parcel B on the revised Master Plan. Environmental commitments were added to revised Ordinance text for panther and black bear management. Revised Statement of Utility Provisions included in 2' submittal. Submittal 3 included an authorization for interconnection of lake system between Regal Acres RPUD Parcel A and Regal Acres RPUD Parcel B. Submittal 3 also included revisions, requested by the County Attorney, to the PUD document. LOCATION: The subject site is comprised of five parcels totaling 23.15 acres and is located approximately 0.25 miles west of Greenway Road, ±3.1 miles east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951), and ± 0.56 miles north of Tamiami Trail East (US 41), in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Relevant to this petition, the Urban designation is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including residential developments such as RPUDs. With this application packet, the petitioner submitted a strike -through, underline revision of the previous housing agreement for Regal Acres RPUD. The draft housing agreement is between Habitat for Humanity for Collier County, Inc. and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners and will replace the original housing agreement. The agreement is for the developer to construct a total of 300 affordable residential dwelling units on Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 . 239-252-2400 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 73 the total ±59.9 gross acres at a density of 5 units per gross acre on the property (5 DU/A 8 59.5 A = 299.5 DUs = 300 DUs). The original Regal Acres housing agreement was to provide 184 affordable residential dwelling units on 36.75 acres at a density of 5 DU/A per affordable housing agreement (5 DU/A * 36.75 A = 183.75 DUs = 184DUs). Under the FLUE's Density Rating System, the project is eligible for a maximum density of 3 dwelling units per acre (DU/A), with an additional bonus of up to 8 dwelling units per acre for providing affordable -workforce housing (which is proposed) for a total of 11 DU/A; eligible density is not an entitlement. The FLUE states the following, "To encourage the provision of affordable -workforce housing within certain Districts and Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to eight (8) residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the requirements of the Affordable -workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code...)" Base Density 4 DU/A CHHA Density Reduction -1 DU/A Affordable Housing Bonus +8 DU/A Maximum eligible density 11 DU/A x 59.9 acres = 658.9 DUs = 659 DUs Since the draft housing agreement is for a maximum density of 5 DU/A which is well below the maximum eligible density of 11 DU/A, the proposed density is consistent with the Density Rating System of the FLUE. In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following FLUE policies (in italics) are implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. Objective 7: Objective 7 of the FLUE states: "Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the County, where applicable, and as follows: " Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The subject site fronts on Greenway Road, a local road, but does not abut an arterial or collector road. Greenway Road connects to Tamiami Trail East (US 41) to the south.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Exhibit `C' PUD Master Plan shows a loop road within part of the currently developed portion of the project site that will connect to an additional loop road for the future development on the 23.15 acres being added to the RPUD.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 . 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 74 9.A.4 streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [Exhibit `C' PUD Master Plan shows no interconnections with adjoining properties. To the north is a gated, platted and partially developed residential PUD, Naples Reserve Golf Club, and vacant (A) Rural, Agricultural zoned land. To the west is an almost fully developed residential area, Walnut Lakes PUD; interconnections do not appear feasible. To the south of the additional 23.15 acres is a large, fully developed mobile home community, and single family homes exist in the (A) Rural, Agricultural zoning district to the south of the original Regal Acres RPUD; given that the existing developments do not have any accommodations for an interconnection, it does not appear feasible. Comprehensive Planning leaves review of the Transportation Element to Transportation Planning staff.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [Exhibit A lists a number of different permissible housing types. The developer, Habitat for Humanity, is applying to construct affordable - workforce housing. Exhibit `C' PUD Master Plan shows sidewalks throughout the RPUD. No deviations for sidewalks are proposed with this submittal. Open space is provided for as required by the LDC, with no deviation requested. Although clubhouses, meeting rooms and community buildings are listed in Exhibit `A: B.2.' as permitted accessory uses, no facility is shown on the Exhibit `C' PUD Master Plan. Civic activities often utilize meeting rooms in a community building or clubhouse, when a facility is constructed by the developer.] CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, the proposed PUD may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division PUDZ-PL2017-1733 Regal Acres R3.docx Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 . 239-252-2400 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 75 Exhibit E AHDBA-Parcel B This space for recording AGREEMENT AUTHORIZING AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS AND IMPOSING COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the day of , 2018, by and between Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc., Mr. Nick Kouloheras, President (the "Developer") and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (the "Commission"), collectively, the "Parties". RECITALS: A. The Developer owns a tract of real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (The "Property"). It is the Developer's intent to construct a maximum of 116 residential units (the "Units") at a density of 5 units per gross acre on the Property. The gross acreage of Property is 23.15 acres. The number of affordable Units constructed by Developer shall be 116, representing 100 percent of the total number of residential Units approved in the development. B. In order to construct the Units, the Developer must obtain a density bonus from the Commission for the Property as provided for in the Collier County Affordable Page 1 of 28 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 76 9.A.5 Housing Density Bonus Ordinance No. 90-89, now codified by Ordinance 04-41, as Land Development Code (LDC) § 2.06.00 of seq., which density bonus can only be granted by the Commission and utilized by the Developer in accordance with the strict limitations and applicability of said provisions. C. The Commission is willing to grant a density bonus to the Developer authorizing the construction of 46 bonus Units on the Property, if the Developer agrees to construct affordable Units as specified in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the approval and grant of the density bonus of 2 units per acre requested by the Developer and the benefits conferred thereby on the Property, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Developer and the Commission hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The above Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Developer Agreements. The Developer hereby agrees that he shall construct 116 affordable Units which Units shall be sold in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and as specified by the attached Appendices A & B, Exhibits A, B, and C, and Appendix C, and attached hereto. a. The following provisions shall be applicable to the affordable Units: (1) Defined terms: In the event of a conflict between terms as defined in the LDC or in Ordinance No. 90-89, Section 4, the definitions of the LDC will control when applying or interpreting this Agreement. In addition to these defined terms and the applicability of LDC § 2.06.04 "Phasing" shall mean: (a) the phased construction of buildings or structures in separate and distinct stages as shown on a PUD master plan, subdivision master plan or site development plan; or (b) in developments where phased construction is not depicted on a PUD master plan, subdivision master plan or site development plan, the construction of buildings or structures in a clearly defined series Page 2 of 28 Packet Pg. 77 of starts and finishes that are separate and distinct within the development. (2) Median Income. For the purposes of this Agreement, the median income of the area as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) shall be the then current median income for the Naples Metropolitan Statistical Area, established periodically by HUD and published in the Federal Register, as adjusted for family size as shown on the tables attached hereto as Appendix A, Exhibit C, which Exhibit shall be adjusted from time to time in accordance with any adjustments that are authorized by HUD or any successor agency. In the event that HUD ceases to publish an established median income as aforesaid, the Parties hereto shall mutually agree to another reasonable and comparable method of computing adjustments in median income. (3) Eligibility and Qualification of Owner. Family income eligibility is a three-step process: 1) submittal of an application by a prospective Owner; 2) verification of family housing unit provided under the affordable density bonus program prior to being qualified at the appropriate level of income (low or moderate income) in accordance with this Section; 3) certification of eligible Owner by the Community and Human Services Division. The Developer shall be responsible for qualifying Owners by accepting applications, verifying income and obtaining income certification for all affordable units in the subject development. All applications, forms and other documentation required by this Agreement shall be provided to Community and Human Services Division. Qualification by the Developer of any persons as an eligible Owner family shall be subject to review and approval in accordance with the monitoring and enforcement program in LDC §§ 2.06.05 and 2.06.06, respectively. (a) Application. A potential owner shall apply to the developer, owner, manager, or agent to qualify as a very low, low, or moderate income family for the purpose of owning and occupying an affordable housing unit pursuant to the affordable Page 3 of 28 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 78 9.A.5 housing density bonus program. The Preliminary Application for affordable housing unit shall be provided by Collier County Community and Human Services Division as shown in Appendix B, Exhibit A, attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference herein. (b) Income Verification and Certification. No affordable housing unit in the development shall be sold whose household income has not been verified and certified in accordance with this Agreement and LDC § 2.06.05. (c) Income Verification. The Developer shall obtain written verification from the potential occupant (including the entire household) to verify all regular sources of income (including the entire household). The most recent year's federal income tax return for the potential occupants (including the entire household) may be used for the purpose of income verification, attached to the Affordable Housing Applicant Income Verification form, including a statement to release information, occupant verification of the return, and a signature block with the date of application. The verification shall be valid for up to one hundred eighty (180) days prior to occupancy. Upon expiration of the 180 -day period, the information may be verbally updated from the original sources for an additional 30 days, provided it has been documented by the person preparing the original verification. After this time, a new verification form must be completed. The Affordable Housing Applicant Income Verification form shall be provided to the Community and Human Services Division as shown in Appendix B, Exhibit B, attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference herein. (d) Income Certification. Upon receipt of the Preliminary Application for an affordable housing unit and Applicant Income Verification form, the Developer shall require that an income certification form be executed by the potential occupant (including the entire household) prior to occupancy of the affordable housing unit by the occupant. Income certification shall assure that the potential occupant has an appropriate household income which qualifies the potential occupant as eligible to Page 4 of 28 6 � Packet Pg. 79 9.A.5 occupy an affordable housing unit under the affordable housing density bonus program. The Affordable Housing Applicant Income Certification form shall be provided by the Community and Human Services Division as shown in Appendix B, Exhibit C, is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference herein. Random inspection of files containing required documentation to verify occupancy in accordance with this Agreement and LDC § 2.06.00, may be conducted by the Community and Human Services Division upon reasonable notice. (4) Annual Progress and Monitoring Report. The Developer shall provide the Community and Human Services Division an annual progress and monitoring report regarding the delivery of affordable housing units throughout the period of their construction and occupancy. The annual progress and monitoring report shall, at a minimum, provide any information reasonably required to insure compliance with LDC § 2.06.00, or subsequent amendments thereto. The report shall be filed on or before September 30 of each year and the report shall be submitted by the Developer to the Community and Human Services Division. Failure to complete and submit the monitoring report to the Community and Human Services Division within sixty (60) days from the due date shall result in a penalty of up to fifty dollars ($50.00) per day unless a written extension not to exceed thirty (30) days is requested prior to expiration of the sixty (60) day submission deadline. No more than one such extension may be granted in a single year. (5) Occupancy Restrictions. No affordable unit in any building or structure on the Property shall be occupied by the Developer, any person related to or affiliated with the Developer, or by a resident manager. 3. Density Bonus. The Commission hereby acknowledges that the Developer has met all required conditions to qualify for a density bonus, in addition to the base residential density of 3 units per acre, and is therefore granted a density bonus of 2 density bonus units per acre, for a total density (total = density bonus units Page 5 of 28 Packet Pg. 80 9.A.5 per acre X gross acreage) of 5 units/ac, pursuant to LDC § 2.06.00 The Commission further agrees that the Developer may construct thereon, in the aggregate a maximum number of 116 units on the Property provided the Developer is able to secure building permit(s) from Collier County. 4. Commission Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, the Commission acting through the Community and Human Services Division or its successor(s) covenants and agrees to prepare and make available to the Developer any general information that it possesses regarding income limitations and restrictions which are applicable to the affordable Unit. 5. Violations and Enforcement a. Violations. It shall be a violation of this Agreement and LDC § 2.06.00 to sell or occupy, or attempt to sell or occupy, an affordable housing unit provided under the affordable housing density bonus program except as specifically permitted by the terms of this Agreement; or to knowingly give false or misleading information with respect to any information required or requested by the Community and Human Services Division or by any other persons pursuant to the authority which is delegated to them by LDC § 2.06.00. Collier County or its designee shall have full power to enforce the terms of this Agreement. The method of enforcement for a breach or violation of this Agreement shall be at the option of the Commission by criminal enforcement pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.69, Florida Statutes, or by civil enforcement as allowed by law. b. Notice of Violation for Code Enforcement Board Proceedings. Whenever it is determined that there is a violation of this Agreement or of LDC § 2.06.00, that should be enforced before the Code Enforcement Board, then a Notice of Violation shall be issued and sent by the appropriate department by certified return - receipt requested U.S. Mail, or hand -delivery to the person or developer in violation. The Notice of Violation shall comply with the requirements for such Notices. C' Page 6 of 28 Packet Pg. 81 C. Certificate of Occupancy. In the event that the Developer fails to maintain the affordable units in accordance with this Agreement or LDC § 2.06.00, as amended, at the option of the Commission, building permits or certificates of occupancy, as applicable, may be withheld for any future planned or otherwise approved unit located or to be located upon the Property until the entire project is in full compliance with this Agreement and with LDC § 2.06.00, as amended. 6. Assignment by Commission. The Commission may assign all or part of its obligations under this Agreement to any other public agency having jurisdiction over the Property provided that it gives the Developer thirty (30) days advance written notice thereof. The Developer may not assign, delegate or otherwise transfer all or part of its duties, obligations, or promises under this Agreement to any successor in interest to the Property without the express written consent of the Commission, which consent may be withheld for any reason whatsoever. Any attempt to assign the duties, obligations, or promises under this Agreement to any successor in interest to the Property without the express written consent of the Commission as required by this Section shall be void ab initio. 7. Severability. If any section, phrase, sentence or portion of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and all other provisions shall remain effective and binding on the Parties. 8. Notice. Any notices desired or required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall either be personally delivered or shall be sent by mail, postage prepaid, to the Parties at the following addresses: 0 CCAC Page 7 of 28 Packet Pg. 82 9.A.5 To the Commission: Collier County Community and Human Services 3339 E Tamiami Trail Building H, Suite 211 Naples, Florida 34112 To the Developer: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc 11145 Tamiami Trail E. Naples, FL 34113 Attn: Mr. Nick Kouloheras Any Party may change the address to which notices are to be sent by notifying the other Party of such new address in the manner set forth above. 9. Authority to Monitor. The Parties hereto acknowledge that the Collier County Community and Human Services Division or its designee, shall have the authority to monitor and enforce the Developer's obligations hereunder. 10. Indemnify. The Developer hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold Collier County and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from and against any and all claims, penalties, damages, losses and expenses, professional fees, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and all costs of litigation and judgments arising out of any claim, willful misconduct or negligent act, error or omission, or liability of any kind made by Developer, its agents or employees, arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement. 11. Covenants. The Developer agrees that all of its obligations hereunder shall constitute covenants, restrictions, and conditions which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the Property and against every person then having any ownership interest at any time and from time to time until this Agreement is terminated in accordance with Section 14 below. However, the Parties agree that if Developer transfers or conveys the Property to another person or entity, Developer shall have no further obligation hereunder and any person seeking to enforce the terms hereof shall Page 8 of 28 Packet Pg. 83 look solely to Developer's successor in interest for the performance of said obligations. 12. Recording. This Agreement shall be recorded at County's expense in the official records of Collier County, Florida. 13. Entire Agreement. The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties hereto and shall inure to and be binding upon their respective heirs, successors, and assigns. 14. Termination. Each affordable housing unit shall be restricted to remain and be maintained as the required affordable housing as provided in the LDC §2.06.04 15. Modification. This Agreement shall be modified or amended only by the written agreement of both Parties. 16. Discrimination. a. The Developer agrees that neither it nor its agents shall discriminate against any owner or potential owner because of said owners race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, or handicap. b. When the Developer advertises, sells or maintains the affordable housing unit, it must advertise sell, and maintain the same in a non-discriminatory manner and shall make available any relevant information to any person who is interested in purchasing such affordable housing unit. C. The Developer agrees to be responsible for payment of any real estate commissions and fees for which it is liable in the purchase and sale of affordable units. d. The affordable housing units shall be intermixed with, and not segregated from, the market rate dwelling units in the development. e. The square footage, construction and design of the affordable, and gap housing units shall be the same as market rate dwelling units in the development. All physical amenities in the dwelling units, as described in item number seven (7) of the Developer Application for Affordable Housing Density Bonus, Appendix Page 9 of 28 9.A.5 CAO Packet Pg. 84 9.A.5 C, shall be the same for market rate units and affordable units. For developments where construction takes place in more than one phase, all physical amenities as described in item number seven (7) of the Developer Application for Affordable Housing Density Bonus, Appendix C, shall be the same in both the market rate units and the affordable units in each phase. Units in a subsequent phase may contain different amenities than units in a previous phase so long as the amenities for market rate units and affordable units are the same within each phase and provided that in no event may a market rate unit or affordable unit in any phase contain physical amenities less than those described in the Developer Application. 17. Phasing, The percentage of affordable housing units to which the Developer has committed for the total development shall be maintained in each phase and shall be constructed as part of each phase of the development on the Property. Developer commits to 100 percent affordable housing units for this project, with 140 percent of the units in each phase consisting of affordable units. 13, Disclosure. The developer shall not disclose to persons, other than the potential buyer or lender of the particular affordable housing unit or units, which units in the development are designated as affordable housing units. 19. Consistency. This Agreement and authorized development shall be consistent with the Growth Management Plan and land development regulations of Collier County that are in effect at the time of development. Subsequently adopted laws and policies shall apply to this Agreement and to the development to the extent that they are not in conflict with the number, type of affordable housing units and the amount of affordable housing density bonus approved for the development. 20. Affordable Housing Density Bonus Development Agreement. This Agreement is a distinct and separate agreement from "development agreements" as defined by Section 163.3220, Fla. Stat., as amended. 21. Preapplication. Developer has executed and submitted to the Page 10 of 28 Packet Pg. 85 9.A.5 Development Services Department the Developer Application for Affordable Housing Density Bonus, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement as Appendix C and incorporated by reference herein. 22. Governing Law., This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 23. Further Assurances. The Parties hereto shall execute and deliver, in recordable form if necessary, any and all documents, certificates, instruments, and agreements which may be reasonably required in order to effectuate the intent of the Agreement. Such documents shall include but not be limited to any document requested by the Developer to exhibit that this Agreement has terminated in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 14 above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA , DEPUTY CLERK By: ANDY SOLIS, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal�eney: Jennifer A. Belpedio, Assistant County Attorney <7 Page 11 of 28� Packet Pg. 86 DEVELOPER_ Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, tnc Witnesses: By: _. Nick Kouloheras 1 ~ ' Printed Name 1 ri Kea( STATE OF FLORIDA } COUNTY OF COLLIER ) The foregoing Agreement Authorizing Affordable Housing Density Bonus And Imposing Covenants And Restrictions On Real Property was acknowledged before me by fJt-<K „L6LtL)J4:r, as Oy s,cl,,,,4- WW is personally known to me or has produced 2018. as identification. WITNESS my hand and official sea[ this _ 2 day of &igs4, My Commission Expires: Page 12 of 28 Notary Public 9.A.5 Q' Packet Pg. 87 9.A.5 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A PARCEL No. 007377(0(108 & 00741080606 (ORB 3959, PG 358 1) THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 112 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD P1;RPOSES, AND THE EAST 112 OF THE EAST 112 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP SI SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES, OF THE PUIBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL B PARCEL No. 00738280008 (ORB 4467, PG 1397) NORTH 112 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 114 OF SECTION 12, TRACT 51 SO[ ';TH, RANGE 26 E. PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY TAX DEED OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 875, PAGE 445, OF THE PUZLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL No. 00737720006 (ORB 5083, PG 657) THE WEST 112 OF THE EAST 112 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONTAINING TEN (10) ACRES, MORE OR LESS, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL No. 007411 0111 04 (ORB 5441, PG 1850) (PER TITLE COMMITMENT) THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 114 (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 (NE 114) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTION THAT PORTION LYING IN THE WEST 112 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4. ALSO BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE EAST 1,018.64 FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Page 13 of 28 Packet Pg. 88 APPENDIX A, EXHIBIT A NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITSIMONTHLY BASE RENTS NUMBER OF UNITS BASE RENT Single Multi Single Multi Family Family Family Family GAP INCOME (81-1.50% MI) Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom TOTAL LOW TO MODERATE INCOME (60-80% MI) Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 116 4 Bedroom TOTAL 1 i6 LOW INCOME (51%-60% MI) Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom Page 14 of 28 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 89 9.A.5 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom TOTAL VERY LOW INCOME (50% OR LESS MI) Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom TOTAL (1) Base residential density allowed in this development 3 units/acre. (2) Gross acreage 23.15, (3) Maximum number of affordable housing density bonus units allowed in this development pursuant to LDC Section 2.06.00 185 units. (4) Gross residential density of this development (including affordable housing density bonus units) 5 units/acre. (5) Percentage of affordable housing units pledged by the developer (as a percent of the total number units in the development) 100%. Page 15 of 28 Packet Pg. 90 APPENDIX A, EXHIBIT B AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS RATING SYSTEM LDC § 2.06.03, provides for calculation of a density bonus for developers pledging to construct affordable units within their development. Included in this Exhibit B are instructions for and the tables with which to calculate the density bonus for a particular project. Exhibit C contains the current median income and acceptable rents for very low, low, moderate, and gap income households in Collier County. The affordable housing density bonus rating system shall be used to determine the amount of the affordable housing density bonuses which may be granted for a development based on household income level, type of affordable housing units (owner -occupied or rental, single-family or multi -family, where applicable and percentage of affordable housing units in the development. To use the affordable housing density bonus rating system, Table A, below, shall be used. Table A shall be reviewed and updated if necessary on an annual basis by the Board of County Commissioners or its designee. First, choose the household income level (very low, low, or moderate) of the affordable housing unit(s) proposed in the development, as shown in Table A. Next, determine the percent of that type of affordable housing unit(s) proposed in the development compared to the total number of dwelling units in the development. From this determination, Table A will indicate the maximum number of residential dwelling units per gross acre that may be added to the base density. These additional residential dwelling units per gross acre are the maximum affordable housing density bonus (AHDB) available to that development. Developments with percentages of affordable housing units which fall in between the percentages shown on Table A shall receive an affordable housing density bonus equal the lower of the two percentages it lies between plus 1110th of a residential dwelling unit per gross acre for each additional percentage of affordable housing rental units in the development. For example, a development which has 24% of its total residential dwelling units as affordable housing units, and which has an affordable housing density bonus rating of "four" will receive an affordable housing density bonus (AHDB) of 4.4 residential dwelling units per gross acre for the development. In no event shall the affordable housing density bonus exceed eight (8) dwelling units per gross acre. 9.A.5 Page 16 of 28 Packet Pg. 91 9.A.5 APPENDIX A, EXHIBIT B AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS RATING SYSTEM Please calculate your density bonus in the space provided below. Attach additional pages if necessary. TABLE A: AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS RATING MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSITY BONUS BY PERCENT OF DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATED AS AFFORDABLE HOUSING Household Product Income 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% (% median 81-150% Gap MI* ** 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 6 6 n/a (Gap) 61-80% Workforce MI* 2 3 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 51-60% Low MI 3 4 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 50% Very Low or less 4 5 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 MI *Owner -occupied only **May only be used in conjunction with at least 10% at or below 80% MI Total Maximum Allowable Density = Base Density + Affordable Housing Density Bonus. In no event shall the maximum gross density allowed exceed 16 units per acre. Calculations: Moderate Income Household — 3 bedroom units = 1 AHDB @ 100%Affordable Units = 8 Units/Acre 8 du/ac x.23.15 acres =185 dwelling units Requested Bonus Density = 46.30 dwelling units Existing Base Density — 69.45 dwelling units Total Proposed Density =115.75 =116 dwelling units Page 17 of 28 Packet Pg. 92 9.A.5 APPENDIX A, EXHIBIT C INCOME AND RENT LEVELS FOR THE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME. Pursuant Chapter 74, Section 74-402 (a)(1); Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, moderate income is 61% to 80% of the median income, low income is 51 % to 60% of the median income and very low income is less than 50% of the median income. COLLIER COUNTY MEDIAN INCOME 2018 Effective: 41112018 RECOMMENDED RENTAL RATES The Florida Housing Finance Corporation (FHFC) calculates rents to use in the State Apartment Incentive Loan (SAIL) and the Low -Income Rental Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) programs, The rents given below are based on 2001 data from FHFC. Utility costs are provided from the County's Section 8 Rental Assistance Program which is administered by the Collier County Housing Authority. HOUSING COSTS BASED ON 30% FAMILY INCOME Percentage Income Limit by Number of Persons in Household 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 County (Metro) Category Collier County 25% 13,125 15,000 16,875 18,750 20,250 21,750 23,250 24,750 26,250 27,750 (Naples-Maroo Island MSA) 2811,6 14,700 16,800 18,900 21,000 22,680 24,360 26,040 27,720 29,400 31,080 30% 15,750 18,000 20,250 22,500 24,300 26,100 27,900 29,700 31,500 33,300 33% 17,325 19,800 22,275 24,750 26,730 28,710 30,690 32,670 34,650 36,630 350% 18,375 21,000 23,625 26,250 28,350 30,450 32,550 34,650 36,750 38,850 40% 21,00_0 24,000 27,000 30,000 32,400 34,800 37,200 39,600 42,000 44,400 45% 23,625 27,000 30,375 33,750 36,450 39,150 41,850 44,550 47,250 49,950 50% 26,250 30,000 33,750 37,500 40,500 43,500 46,500 49,500 52,500 55,500 60% 31,500 36,000 40,500 45,000 48,600 52,200 $5,800 59,400 63,000 66,600 80°k 42,000 48,000 54,000 60,000 64,800 69,600 74,400 79,200 84,000 88,800 Median: 75,000 120% 63,000 72,000 81,000 90,000 97,200 104,400 111,600 116,800 126,000 133,200 140°% 73,500 84,000 94,500 105,000 113,400 121,800 130,200 138,600 147,000 155,400 RECOMMENDED RENTAL RATES The Florida Housing Finance Corporation (FHFC) calculates rents to use in the State Apartment Incentive Loan (SAIL) and the Low -Income Rental Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) programs, The rents given below are based on 2001 data from FHFC. Utility costs are provided from the County's Section 8 Rental Assistance Program which is administered by the Collier County Housing Authority. HOUSING COSTS BASED ON 30% FAMILY INCOME Page 18 of 28 Packet Pg. 93 ONE BEDROOM UNIT TWO BEDROOM UNIT THREE BEDROOM UNIT FOUR BEDROOM UNIT 150% $1,961 $2,355 $2,720 $3,034 80% $1,046 $1,256 $1,451 $1,618 60% $785 $942 $1,089 $1,215 50% $654 $785 $907 $1,012 35% $458 $549 $635 $708 25% $327 $392 $453 $506 Page 18 of 28 Packet Pg. 93 LOCATION Naples and Coastal Collier County Immokalee and East of ESTIMATED UTILITY ALLOWANCES ONE BIR TWO BIR THREE BIR FOUR BIR UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT 71.00 91.00 128.00 156.00 Everglades Blvd. 67.00 106.00 148.00 173.00 Golden Gate 96.00 144.00 186.00 211.00 YOU MUST DEDUCT UTILITIES TO CALCULATE NET RENTS. Page 19 of 28 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 94 APPENDIX B, EXHIBIT A PRELIMINARY APPLICATION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT Date Occupancy Desired: Your Name: Co -Tenant Name Present Address: Name of Landlord _ Landlord's Address: Date of Application: Amt. Of Sec. Deposit:_ Race/National Origin: Handicap: Yes No Race/National Origin: Handicap: Yes No Street City State Zip Telephone No How Long at this Address: Street City State Zip Telephone No. If you have resided at your present address less than 3 years, please state previous address: Street City State Zip Telephone No. Name of Previous Landlord Street City APPLICANT: Present Employers Name Address and Telephone No. How long with Present Employer: Gross Salary: Hourly $ Weekly $ Social Security Number Previous Employers Name Address and Telephone No. How long with Previous Employer COTENANT: Present Employers Name Address and Telephone No. How long with Present Employer: State Zip Telephone No. Job Title Every 2 Weeks $ Birth Date Job Title Job Title Monthly $ 9.A.5 Page 20 of 28 Packet Pg. 95 Gross Salary: Hourly $ Social Security Number Previous Employers Name Address and Telephone No. Weekly $ Every 2 Weeks $ Monthly $ Birth Date How long with Previous Employer Job Title NAMES OF ALL WHO WILL OCCUPY APARTMENT BIRTH DATE SEX AGE 2. I PERSONAL REFERENCES (Nat Relatives) 1. Name: Address:_ 2. Name: Address: SOCIAL SECURITY How Long Known: How Long Known: 9.A.5 Page 21 of 28 Packet Pg. 96 9.A.5 APPENDIX B, EXHIBIT B AFFORDABLE HOUSING APPLICANT INCOME VERIFICATION Date: Applicant's Name: Co -Tenant's Name: : Social Security Number Social Security Number Present Address: Street City State I hereby make application for a single family unit at _ I hereby declare and reveal all of my sources of income. Zip Telephone No. I am aware that to leave out, omit or fail to report my assets or forms of income from pensions, stocks, bonds, real property rent, sale or ownership is a fraudulent act punishable by law. Knowingly falsifying information on this form is cause for refusal of occupancy. I hereby certify that this will be my permanent residence and that I have no other assisted housing. I understand that this information is for the purpose of computing my annual income to determine my qualification to buy an affordable, workforce, or gap housing unit. I understand that I am not required to surrender my ownership or rights or claimed property, pensions or capital gains, etc. Applicant Amount Frequency Received of Pay Co -Occupant Amount Frequency Received of Pay Wages/Salary $ $ $ $ Bonuses $ $ $ $ Tips $ $ $ $ Commissions $ $ $ $ Interest Income $ $ $ $ Trust Fund Income $ $ $ $ Unemployment $ $ $ $ Workman's Compensation $ $ $ $ Welfare $ $ $ $ Food Stamps $ $ $ $ Social Security $ $ $ $ Social Security Disability $ $ $ $ Supplemental SSI $ $ $ $ Family Assistance $ $ $ $ Child Support $ $ $ $ Veterans Benefits $ $ $ $ Widows Benefits $ $ $ $ Page 22 of 28 Packet Pg. 97 9.A.5 Union Pension $ $ $ $ Self -Employment Business, Silent Partner, etc. $ $ $ $ Private Insurance Pension $ $ $ $ TOTAL ANNUAL INCOME $ $ THE VERIFICATION HERE REQUESTED MAY TAKE THE FORM OF THE MOST RECENT YEAR'S INCOME TAX RETURN FOR EACH OCCUPANT WHO HAS FILED AND WILL OCCUPY THE AFFORDABLE, WORKFORCE, OR GAP UNIT. THE SAME MUST BE EXECUTED FOR EACH OCCUPANT OF THE HOUSEHOLD WHO CONTRIBUTED TO THE ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME, FAILURE TO REPORT ALL SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME WILL RESULT IN DISQUALIFICATION FOR TENANCY IN AFFORDABLE, WORKFORCE, OR GAP HOUSING UNIT, Page 23 of 28 Packet Pg. 98 APPENDIX B, EXHIBIT C AFFORDABLE HOUSING APPLICANT INCOME CERTIFICATION APPLICANT: Present Employer: Address: Street I, (Applicant) on this certification form. STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) ss COUNTY OF COLLIER) Job Title: City State Zip hereby authorize the release of information requested The foregoing was acknowledged before me by Who is personally known to me or has produced identification. Witness my hand and official seal this (notary seal) My Commission Expires: Page 24 of 28 Signature of Applicant as day of , 2018 Notary Public Packet Pg. 99 EMPLOYER CERTIFICATION Applicant's Gross Annual Income or Rate or Pay: $ Number of Hours Worked (Weekly): . Frequency of Pay: Amount of Bonuses, Tips, or other Compensation Received: $ $ Monthly Annually Supervisor STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) ss COUNTY OF COLLIER) The foregoing was acknowledged before me by Who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. Witness my hand and official seal this day of , 2018. (notary seal) My Commission Expires: Page 25 of 28 Notary Public a a� aD M M ti 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N a to r E L a m 0 aD 0 x L 0 Q t v Q i E V Q Packet Pg. 100771 9.A.5 APPENDIX C DEVELOPER APPLICATION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS Pursuant to LDC § 2.06.01 please complete this form and submit it with any accompanying documentation to the Community Development & Environmental Services Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. A copy must also be provided to the Collier County Community and Human Services Department. All items requested must be provided. 1. Please state what zoning districts are proposed by the applicant, if any, on the property and the acreage of each; Parcel B of the Regal Acres RPUD is 23.15 acres 2. Has an application for rezoning been requested in conjunction with the affordable housing density bonus process? X Yes No If yes, state date of application October 20, 2017 and if the request has been approved, state the Ordinance number 3. Gross density of the proposed development. 5 Gross acreage of the proposed development. 23.15 4. Are affordable -workforce housing density bonus units sought in conjunction with an application for a planned unit development (PUD)? X Yes No. If yes, please state name and location of the PUD and any other identifying information. Regal Acres RPUD Develo Ment Parcel B;. Located on the west side of Greenwa Road approximately 3 %2 miles east of Collier Blvd (C.R. 951) and approximately one mile north of U.S. 41. Property ID# 00737760008, 00741080606, 00738280008, 00737720006 00741100104 5. Name of applicant: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. Name of land developer if not the same as Applicant: Page 26 of 28 Packet Pg. 101771 6. Please complete the following tables as they apply to the proposed development. TABLE I Total Number of Units in Development Type of Owner Unit Rental Occupied Efficiency One Bedroom Two Bedroom Three Bedroom Other Bedroom TOTAL 116 116 TABLE 11 Number of Affordable -Workforce Housing Units Total Number of Proposed Use for Affordable Units Density Bonus Units in Development Owner Owner Rental Occupied Rental Occupied LOW -MODERATE INCOME 60-80% MI Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 116 Other .= TOTAL 116 In accordance with LDC Section 2.06.03.D. — All owner occupied Page 27 of 28 9.A.5 a a� aD M M ti 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N a to E a� a m 0 (D U) M 0 x 0 a 0 0 a aD U �o a Packet Pg. 1 2 9.A.5 7. Please provide a physical description of the affordable units by type of unit (very low income, low income, moderate income, gap income) and by number of bedrooms. Include in your description, for example, the square footage of each type of unit, floor coverings used throughout the unit (carpeting, tile, vinyl flooring); window treatments; appliances provided such as washer/dryer, dishwasher, stove, refrigerator; bathroom amenities, such as ceiling exhaust fans; and any other amenities as applicable. Attach additional pages as Exhibit "D" if needed. Parcel B of Regal Acres RPUD will be designed and developed with single family homes, although the developer may construct duplex or multi -family homes. Single family units will be owner occupied and will have less than or equal to 1,400 square feet of living area. Alternate two-family or multi -family dwelling units would be the same floor area. All of the units will have at least 3 bedrooms and 1 bath. The homes will be designed for low and moderate -income families. The dwelling units will be designed with vinyl tile flooring and have window blinds, a washer and dryer, kitchen range with oven, refrigerator, bathroom exhaust fans, and central air conditioning. S. Please supply any other information which would reasonably be needed to address this request for an affordable, workforce, and gap housing density bonus for this development. Attach additional pages if needed. The project qualifies for up to S units per acre of additional affordable housing bonus density in addition to the three (3) base density units per acre. The petitioner is only requesting 2 units per acre from the eligible additional density bonus, resulting in gross development density of 5 units per acre for a total of 116 dwelling units on Parcel B, with the entire RPUD accommodating 300 units. All units will be designed as affordable housing. Additionally, Parcel B will contain common recreation space, preserves, pathways and a lake. It will meet new discharge standards to provide ample control of flooding both for the project and the surrounding area. Adequate access will be provided through the RPUD's loop road system, with two access points from Greenway Road. This request is consistent with the County's Growth Management Plan policies, especially those addressing affordable housing. Page 28 of 28 Packet Pg. 1 3 Modified Site Plan -Regal Acres Expansion would support the below modifications: S' Tali Concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible 11 -AT ol F -I M -Irl -F-07#1191 Opportunity to review and submit feedback on pr osed wall & foliage l y9 �" Packet Pg. 104 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion -- w.- A4 NOW �4 f �r--4r� V's -1 '-774, 4 -'- ti .r* r O O 01 �,,� ,yam �^!� s�. rye, aiq �P ,IIr �4 ; yr, _ - O 1,4 '- '. d Ad 45 gal rL co E JAL would support the below c modifications Q L L O U W 8' Tall concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) CE a Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible a o rt ity evi and submit feedback on proposed wall & fol iagE nd r/i a Packet Pg. 105 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion would support the below 0 M"11010011115; v modifications: Q L L 0 U W S' Tall Concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) 1.00M i` ►• a w Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible a Opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage 3euv� F/Ru L . -,to n -:�-orC a — Packet Pg. 106 M M r CD 4 � Q a :. • £f i .3�� F �a'!q y <D i -3 d. :. E O would support the below 0 M"11010011115; v modifications: Q L L 0 U W S' Tall Concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) 1.00M i` ►• a w Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible a Opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage 3euv� F/Ru L . -,to n -:�-orC a — Packet Pg. 106 -- 9.A.6 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion -,,!%o 44- Ov. On r would support the below modifications: 8' Tall Concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible Make sure-121ans arespot on: Opportunity t review and submit feedb ek on pr posed wall & foliage i Packet Pg. 107 9.A.6 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion I would support the below modifications: 8' Tall Concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible Opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage Packet Pg. 108 I 9.A.6 I Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion r I support the below modifications: Dp,!QM@5e impacts of sight and sound: 8' Tall Concrete wall -- Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) Hide the wall: Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible Opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage Habitat agrees to submit plan as condition of approval for re -zoning - - - - - - - - - - Packet Pg. 109 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion vaLin; . •i�lstra�� 3r- '' 4, RYA, ■ t• _ tal Aar Y I would support the below modifications: S' Tall Concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible Make sure Dlans are spot r Opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage J._---- l� �4� � v��,1 or - Packet Pg. 110 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion would support the below modifications: 8' Tall Concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible Opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & f iage Packet Pg. 111 9.A.6 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion would support the below modifications C ■l:Mcxti�aIIIION Lot KR•J E.1I-A tI11FqIILIP RzIn IILW i • r Concrete Aesthetically r r • # • yellow lines) � Hide the wallm Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible unity to review and s feedback on proposed wall & foliagE Packet Pg. 112 1 km 9.A.6 Modified Site Plan -Regal Acres Expansion would support the below modifications: 8' Tail Concrete wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage A)X41-� �� Packet Pg. 113 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion a I would support the below modifications: 8' Tall Concrete wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) ■ ra- M M Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible Opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage Packet Pg. 114 9.A.6 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion X W-4 '.,add would support the below modifications: S' Tall Concrete wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) I•o- �-.- Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible Opportunity to re Mme. �i. U• �1 ,iew and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage � a Packet Pg. 115 9e6 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansior 7 47 1111,qy�J if � .,� `�'7ti �• mow. �,� �P � .J: S • Xi. Z4 I would support the below modifications, Of sight 8' Tall Concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) Nide the wall• Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible Make sure plan,$ arespQt ono Opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage i q-� �1-e . /UA OCE S r FL- . Packet Pg. 116 9.A.6 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion Ile ell IAZ - w Q9 y or - :• E�:a• �I�k, - OCI 'ArF K. i? �9 I would support the below modifications: 8' Taj! Concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) Hi e the wall: Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible Opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage I i Packet Pg. 117 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion "` f yy �';tac In e � �„. a �� 47 ��a�FE wort0 Alp E 40 would support the below modifications: 8' Tall Concrete Wall -- Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) Hie th wall: Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible Make sure Q s Qt on: Opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage Packet Pg. 118 9.A.6 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion �n, would support the below modifications: 104 —. - r, r •� . �r r r 8' Tall Concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) w ■ *Urn W,u�.� gra Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible Opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage )t - - _ Packet Pg. 119 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion Aa AN 6n n all x w� e would support the below modifications: r VIA I j A I or -lei � 0 8" Tall Concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible a opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage :. -r I Packet Pg. 120 9.A.6 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion r lH would support the below modifications •- -. - i •A to &I To] A I I 8' Tall Concrete Wall - Aesthetically Pleasing (following yellow lines) Hide wa Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible Opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliag( C7 ° r� • / r W 0 Q Id. Cl) Cl) ti 0 0 0 I- 0 N J d N O D d - - - Packet Pg. 121 - 9.A.6 Modified Site Plan - Regal Acres Expansion I would support the belowmodifications'. Decreaseim a two si9hLA S' Tail Concrete Wail - Aesthetically lines) Bide—tile waft Heavy foliage on both sides of wall to make as opaque as possible -- - Mc :0 Ce ans aie spot on: opportunity to review and submit feedback on proposed wall & foliage Packet Pg. 122 9.A.6 SaboJames From: Raymond williams <raymondwilliamsjr@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 9:01 AM To: SaboJames Subject: Habitat for Humanity Regal Acres II Good morning. L I am one of the board of directors at Westwind Estates in East Naples. Habitat for Humanity reached out to us a back in the spring and had a meeting with the residents and board members to discuss their Regal Acres II 6 project. We brought up a few concerns about noise and what we would like to see done. They listened to our concerns and went back and addressed those problems. And came back with a solution that was more than M acceptable to us. And we would welcome them as Neighbors. r O o Raymond Williams r O Board member a Westwind Estates o a Make everyday the best it can. Life is to short not too. Sent by Outlook for Android Packet Pg. 123 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Department Head Growth Management Dept/Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: As Naples residents, we are very concerned about the inadequate availability of affordable housing for middle and lower income wage earners. Therefore, we support the Regal Acres proposal. Families have been thriving for decades through the work of Habitat and undoubtedly, this project will yield a similar result. To say that affordable housing is needed is an understatement. In the condo complex we lived in before moving to Reflection Lakes, a young teacher who lived in our building had to work nights and weekends as a waitress to afford what is considered 'moderately priced' housing here in Naples. And there is hardly enough of that around. We don't know the particulars of the 'security issues' people seem to be all worked up about here but from what we do know it appears that they are talking about typical teenage behavior that goes on regardless of socioeconomic status. The other concerns seem a bit disingenuous. East Naples is growing by leaps and bounds. Everywhere you look there are plans for growth and we don't see any big outcry about that We need to support the people who contribute to the quality of our daily lives here. The stabilizing force of home ownership has been proven to be an important value upon which families flourish. We hope one day we will all begin to realize what we can gain by living closer together with people from all walks of life, rather than closing each other out. Good luck in making this project come to pass. Sincerely, Ronald and Janice Tramontano 14693 Sonoma Blvd Naples, FL 34114 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 124 8/16/18 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Department Head Commissioner Donna Fiala, District 1 Growth Management Department/Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: PL20170001733 Regal Acres PUDR Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen, As a full-time, Naples resident, I would like to express my full support for the proposed project known as Regal Acres PUDR. After viewing the proposed plans and addition units to the current Regal Acres PUD, I am in full support. Habitat for Humanity is a great non-profit and has helped many families. Living in a Habitat Community is at times the only way that a lower income family can afford to purchase a home that they can take pride in and call their own. Their mortgages are affordable, and according to Forbes, the median income in the U.S. is $55,775. If this were your income, you'd make about $4,648 gross per month; only 28% of that monthly income should be spent on a mortgage. That comes out to be about $1,301. Not all families have a two -income household, and keep in mind that gross income does not factor in all the expenses that are deducted from your paycheck before it even hits the banks, your net monthly income would not be as calculated. What about all the other living expenses? As a single mother, and employee to this board, my income does not come close to the U.S. median income. Yet, the rents in Collier County are absurd, and on average a 1 bedroom can range from $1,128 — $1,477 (See Attached Spreadsheet). Most if not all the lower priced apartments in Naples are not even attainable for a working parent like myself because they have income restrictions, that are too low to meet. It's parents and families like myself that fall into that category where you earn too much to qualify for any discounts, yet not enough to live alone; that can benefit from more housing like the one being proposed in Regal Acres. If it were not for Habitat for Humanity, many people would not have the opportunity to be proud homeowners. Adding the additional land to build a Phase II to the already built Regal Acres is a good idea. The proposed homes are attractive and are affordable for many Naples Residents. Not everyone is able to afford the homes built in the gated communities, such as Reflection Lakes. After seeing some of the models listed for sale in the Reflection Lakes Community, they are very similar to those already built, and like the ones being proposed. There are both attached and detached single family homes. It meets the same criteria, with the exception that the homes in Regal Acres are affordable and not so luxurious. But when you have the opportunity to own your home, luxury is not a deal breaker. I'm confident in the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners to make the right decision and approve Regal Acres RPUD. S' ly, -r�tf Jessica Velasco Naples, FL 34112 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 125 9.A.6 v CL a� t E 0 L- 4 - (D 4- m U c (D c 0 a N L- 0 0 U Uj c (D E t r r Q r c a� E R a Packet Pg. 126 Apartment Pricing Per Website Apartment Name Zip Code 1 Bed Min 1 Bed Max 2 Bed Min 2 Bed Max 3 Bed 3 bed Max Goodlette Arms (HU 34102 NA NA NA NA NA NA Jasmine Cay 34102 NA NA NA NA NA NA George Washington 34102 NA NA NA NA NA NA Gordon River 34102 NA NA $1,100.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,300.00 Bryn Mawr 34104 $1,100.00 $ 1,175.00 $1,275.00 $ 1,300.00 NA NA Ibis Club 34104 NA NA NA NA NA NA Meadow Lakes 34104 $1,229.00 NA $1,455.00 NA $1,635.00 NA River Reach 34104 $1,214.00 NA $1,544.00 NA NA NA Saddlebrook Village 34104 NA NA NA NA NA NA Tuscan Isle 34104 NA NA NA NA NA NA Villas of Capri 34104 $ 755.00 NA $ 907.00 NA $1,047.00 Orchid Run 34104 $1,581.00 $ 2,043.00 $1,846.00 $ 2,375.00 $ 2,173.00 $ 2,795.00 Belvedere 34105 $1,329.00 $ 1,369.00 $1,337.00 $ 1,685.00 NA NA La Costa 34105 $1,250.00 $ 1,628.00 $1,426.00 $1,833.00 NA NA Bermuda Island 34109 $1,249.00 $ 1,349.00 $1,570.00 $1,655.00 $1,675.00 $ 2,005.00 Laguna Bay 34109 $1,285.00 $ 1,365.00 $1,405.00 $1,505.00 NA NA Oasis - Arbor Walk 34109 $1,175.00 $ 1,320.00 $1,270.00 $ 1,560.00 NA NA Summer Lakes 1 34109 $ 503.00 NA $ 952.00 NA $1,103.00 NA Summer Lakes 11 34109 NA NA $ 952.00 NA $1,103.00 NA Summer Wind - Ariu 34109 $1,180.00 $ 1,679.00 $1,270.00 $ 2,167.00 NA NA Windsong Club 34109 NA NA NA NA NA NA Bear Creek 239-51z 34109 NA NA NA NA NA NA Meadow Brook Pres 34110 $1,444.00 NA $1,513.00 NA $1,712.00 NA Somerset Palms - Ar 34110 NA NA $1,399.00 NA $1,599.00 NA Heron Park - Point a 34112 $1,225.00 NA $1,375.00 NA $1,600.00 NA Naples 701 34112 $1,005.00 $ 1,170.00 NA NA NA NA Osprey Landing 34112 NA NA NA NA NA NA Shadowood Park 34112 NA NA NA NA NA NA Collier Housing Alter 34112 NA NA NA NA NA NA College Park 34113 NA NA $ 942.00 NA $1,095.00 NA Whistlers Cove 34113 NA NA NA NA NA NA Aster Lely Resort 34113 $1,223.00 $ 1,831.00 $1,528.00 $ 2,210.00 $1,915.00 $ 2,733.00 Sierra Grande 34113 $1,276.00 $ 1,840.00 $1,393.00 $ 2,037.00 $1,618.00 $ 2,445.00 San Marino - Aventh 34114 NA NA NA NA NA NA Berkshire Reserve 34116 NA NA $1,595.00 $1,700.00 $ 2,000.00 NA Coral Palms 34116 $ 860.00 $ 970.00 $1,020.00 $1,230.00 NA NA Heritage - Mer Solei 34116 $ 978.00 $ 1,125.00 $ 933.00 $1,353.00 NA NA Naples Place 1-111 34116 NA NA NA NA NA NA Noah's Landing 34116 NA NA NA NA NA NA Northgate Club 34116 NA NA NA NA NA NA Sabal Key 34116 $1,110.00 $ 1,820.00 $1,165.00 $1,890.00 NA NA Waverly Place 34116 $1,235.00 NA $1,375.00 $1,500.00 $1,507.00 NA Whistlers Green 34116 $ 773.00 NA $ 919.00 NA $1,058.00 NA Housing Alternative 34116 NA NA NA I NA NA INA Brittany Bay I & II 34119 $ 861.00 NA $ 978.00 1 NA $1,109.00 NA v CL a� t E 0 L- 4 - (D 4- m U c (D c 0 a N L- 0 0 U Uj c (D E t r r Q r c a� E R a Packet Pg. 126 Malibu Lakes 34119 $1,249.00 NA $1,599.00 $ 1,749.00 $1,849.00 $ 2,005.00 Crestview Park 34142 Crestview Park II 34142 Cypress Run 34142 Eden Gardens II 34142 Farm Worker VillagE 34142 Garden Lakes Apts 34142 Heritage Villas of Im 34142 Oakhaven 34142 Sanders Pines 34142 So Villas Immokalee 34142 Summer Glen 34142 Timber Ridge of Im 34142 Willowbrook Place 1 34142 1 Bed Min 1 Bed Max 2 Bed Min 2 Bed Max 3 Bed 3 bed Max Average $1,128.71 $ 1,477.43 $1,287.25 $1,702.88 $1,499.89 $ 2,213.83 Zip Code Total 34102 4 34104 9 34105 2 34109 8 34110 2 34112 5 34113 4 34114 1 34116 10 34119 2 34142 13 Immokalee 9.A.6 v CL a� t r E 0 L- 4 - (D 4- m U c (D c 0 a N L L- 0 0 U Uj C E L V R r Q r C d E t V R a Packet Pg. 127 14534 Manchester Drive Naples Florida 34114 June 27, 2018 Collier County Commissioners and Planning Commission Liaison Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Bellows, Ms. Fiala, Mr. Solis, Mr. Saunders, Ms. Taylor, Mr.. McDaniel, Mr. Mark Strain: Our community gathered for a meeting with Habitat for Humanity representatives last evening, June 26, 2018 in Reflection Lakes. The goal was to reach agreement to stop the rezoning or facilitate compromise via additional building plan modifications to reduce noise and privacy to those residents bordering the preserve area separating both developments. Increased housing from 184 to 300 units will only increase noise and opportunity for trespassing to our quiet retirement neighborhood. This was the second meeting and this the second letter Reflection Lakes homeowners have voiced their concerns. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes not only paid larger premium fees for lots that were to border permanent woodland, but stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. As discussed with Habitat at the meeting, we strongly advocate for the DENIAL OF REZONING. In the event you refuse to support our community, we expect the following at Habitat's expense: 1 No less than an eight -foot solid wall between developments to block noise and trespass. 2. Move the playground and basketball court closer to Greenway Road from current planned location 3. Do not construct 22 Habitat homes closest to the preserve thus maintaining the preserve's trees and allowing room for a barrier wall on Habitat's property. 4. Consider the financial impact of upgrading roads leading to these Habitat homes as current conditions threaten optimal access by emergency personnel and vehicles. Sincerely Robert J. and Vicki L. Smith 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 128 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Department Head Growth Management Dept/Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: As Naples residents, we are very concerned about the inadequate availability of affordable housing for middle and lower income wage earners. Therefore, we support the Regal Acres proposal. Families have been thriving for decades through the work of Habitat and undoubtedly, this project will yield a similar result. To say that affordable housing is needed is an understatement. In the condo complex we lived in before moving to Reflection Lakes, a young teacher who lived in our building had to work nights and weekends as a waitress to afford what is considered 'moderately priced' housing here in Naples. And there is hardly enough of that around. We don't know the particulars of the 'security issues' people seem to be all worked up about here but from what we do know it appears that they are talking about typical teenage behavior that goes on regardless of socioeconomic status. The other concerns seem a bit disingenuous. East Naples is growing by leaps and bounds. Everywhere you look there are plans for growth and we don't see any big outcry about that. We need to support the people who contribute to the quality of our daily lives here. The stabilizing force of home ownership has been proven to be an important value upon which families flourish. We hope one day we will all begin to realize what we can gain by living closer together with people from all walks of life, rather than closing each other out. Good luck in making this project come to pass, Sincerely, Ronald and Janice Tramontano 14693 Sonoma Blvd Naples, FL 34114 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 129 9.A.6 SaboJames From: BellowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 11:33 AM To: SaboJames Subject: FW: Regal II FYI R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2163; Fax: 239.252.6350 Cv e -r Couwty Exceeding expedtations, everyday! Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https:llgoq,glleXjvgT. From: Office Manager[mailto:officemgr@kamconcrete.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 11:12 AM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@ collie rcountyfl.gov>; FialaDonna <Donna.Fiala @colliercountyfl.gov>; SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaundersBurt <Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov>; TaylorPenny <Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov>; McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel @colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Regal II Packet Pg. 130 9.A.6 Blessings, Sue Thomas 863-223-5176 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 131 SaboJames From: BellowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 11:34 AM To: SaboJames Subject: FW: Concern from Reflection Lakes FYI ,R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Exceeding expedlalions, everjiday! TO us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at htt sill oo. l/eXiv T. From: StrainMark Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 10:15 AM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@col liercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Concern from Reflection Lakes Here is another email to forward on the Habitat Project. If you tell me who the planner is I can forward directly in the future. Thanks, M av-1c/ 239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not wont your e mail address rclensed in reaponse to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Ashley Kennedy [mailto:ashinoslz@icloud.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 10:12 AM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountvfl.gov> Subject: Concern from Reflection Lakes 14717 Sonoma Blvd. Naples Florida 34114 June 27, 2018 Collier County Commissioners and Planning Commission Liaison 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 132 9.A.6 SaboJames From: Michael Yancon <michael.yancon@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2018 1:49 PM To: SaboJames Subject: FOR JAMES > Question On Proposed Habitat Development > Regal Acres Attachments: ORIGINAL - Master PUD Separation Ex-B.pdf Mr Sabo - I reached out to Mr Strain last night with the below email asking for his comment / input. After receiving your letter in the mail today regarding the Regal Acres expansion and requesting comments to be directed towards you, I would appreciate if you can review the below & attached, and comment on the questions I posed to Mr Strain at the bottom of the email (highlighted in yellow). Thank you in advance Regards, ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Michael Yancon <michael.vancon@gmail.com> Date: Sat, May 26, 2018 at 1:10 AM Subject: FOR MARK > Question On Proposed Habitat Development > Regal Acres To: markstrain@collieraov.net Mr Strain - I am a resident at Naples Reserve in Southeast Naples who recently became aware that Habitat for Humanity is proposing an expansion of the Regal Acres Community by increasing the number of affordable housing dwelling units from 184 to 300. This expansion will share the south boarder with Naples Reserve. The land parcel under question is currently a "preserve" (IE: land that has never been cleared), which allows many residents in my community (including myself) to enjoy a beautiful and serene view when looking out our back windows and/or when we are in our back yards. Because of this, we have a significant interest in what will be replacing our current "preserve" view. I obtained the Master PUD Separation (attached) which shows the proposed layout of the site, and looked specifically at the buffer zone between our communities (circled below in red): a W E 0 L m c W c 0 a N N L L 0 U LLi c W U 0 r Q c a� E M a Packet Pg. 133 Page 1 Dear Mr. Sabo - Habitat may be claiming that they are building one family homes however they don't remain that way if the cars in the driveways are telling. It appears that many family members aren't living in these homes if they are in fact family members. I believe the presentation was slanted and that the people there did not have a level playing field since they had time to prepare, bring their lawyer, and make a presentation. It is my believe that in future meetings the community members should have someone to make a presentation before the question and answer period And respond to some of the statistics which are easily twisted by the organization applying for a change of zone. Thank you for your attention to this matter and please view the video below in its entirety Packet Pg. 134 file:///C:/Users/j amessabo/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/Content.0utloo... Naples Florida 34114 June 27, 2018 ollier County Commissioners and Planning Commission Liaison Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Bellows, Ms. Fiala, Mr. Solis, Mr. Saunders, Ms. Taylor, Mr. McDaniel, Mr. Mark Strain: Our community gathered for a meeting with Habitat for Humanity representatives last evening, June 26, 2018 in Reflection Lakes. The goal was to reach agreement to stop the rezoning or facilitate compromise via additional building plan modifications to reduce noise and privacy to those residents bordering the preserve area separating both developments. Increased housing from 184 to 300 units will only increase noise and opportunity for trespassing to our quiet retirement neighborhood. This was the second meeting and this the second letter Reflection Lakes homeowners have voiced their concerns. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes not only paid larger premium fees for lots that were to border permanent woodland, but stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. As discussed with Habitat at the meeting, we strongly advocate for the DENIAL OF REZONING. In the event you refuse to support our community, we expect the following at Habitat's expense: 1. No less than an eight -foot solid wall between developments to block noise and trespass. 2. Move the playground and basketball court closer to Greenway Road from current planned location 3. Do not construct 22 Habitat homes closest to the preserve thus maintaining the preserve's trees and allowing room for a barrier wall on Habitat's property. 4. Consider the financial impact of upgrading roads leading to these Habitat homes as current conditions threaten optimal access by emergency personnel and vehicles. Sincerely . ?Zke 9.A.6 rn 1'3 it 2 r s c�fES r C �r I\j/IPLES Packet Pg. 135 Peter Mcycr 14523 Manchester Drive Naples Florida 34114 June 27, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Bellows, Ms. Fiala, Mr. Solis, Mr. Saunders, Ms. Taylor, Mr. McDaniel: Our community gathered for a meeting with Habitat for Humanity representatives last evening, June 26, 2018 in Reflection Lakes. The goal was to reach agreement to stop the rezoning or facilitate compromise via additional building plan modifications to reduce noise and privacy to those residents bordering the preserve area separating both developments. Increased housing from 184 to 300 units will only increase noise and opportunity for trespassing to our quiet retirement neighborhood. This was the third meeting and second letter Reflection Lakes homeowners have voiced their concerns. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. As discussed with Habitat at the meeting, we propose for your consideration: 1. Strongly advocating for the denial of rezoning the 23 acres of agricultural land 2. Recommend no less than a six-foot solid wall between developments to block noise and trespass. 3. Move the playground and basketball court closer to Greenway Road from current planned location 4. Avoid building 22 Habitat homes closest to preserve thus maintaining the preserve's trees and allowing room for a barrier wall on Habitat's property. 5. Consider the financial impact of upgrading roads leading to these Habitat homes as current conditions threaten optimal access by emergency personnel and vehicles. SincFz,e,ly 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 136 fiohear_j HIq P d-17 , I-JIM P ce)VH% Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdo. High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincere ly� � L�'1�e/I Packet Pg. 137 9.A.6 PMAd & AKft_ttj0_Wuttd � Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Utrit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The tinning of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the Iow- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developmentS for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely Packet Pg. 138 9.A.6 Naples Florida 341 t4 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA—Aprit_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. � f ' Sincerely Packet Pg. 139 Chuck Hunt Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 00 Packet Pg. 140 PF Kelsey & Matthew GerherdstklIL t® I LA LASS -t Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely Packet Pg. 141 David Rust & James Waltz —b 6� VIA R0 s'—r ' _JAMES I,dAL% 1X14 Le 3 fog Kcke5+er. Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Packet Pg. 142 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat/ Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution .required notification to authorities. EastNaples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www. eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA—April_2016—Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying f u-ther woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely h" � vs— /4 6b /a -Rile p c-77" Idt [� Q F ( 0 V'r �J Q--, 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 143 Q m r / Z/41 C/A 0 rrz I C2,4'9 C-. CSI--_ Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen; Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 ii" Packet Pg. 144 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we. now experience incidents regularly on weekends. - Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. •ely J 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 145 Kathleen M' Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 CIJ Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen; Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 4,u N sa_vj�_, (D(�Ja_ v �� C� CVS "� Packet Pg. 146 ILA Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr, Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities, East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincer Packet Pg. 147 LearyLeaoaw, "OaM, Maples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what.now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely Packet Pg. 148 < >i -i 1�1 _= 9.A.6 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely lgg70 P", Packet Pg. 149 9.A.6 S _71 ViAIt I . Naples 1 rida 34F14'_` June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdo. High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely Packet Pg. 150 Kevin and Dawn Chard 14546 Lanier Court Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely, A07 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 151 Qr,r ar c_ tom V 1 oci� S C1yr_%_cgc, . Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat/ Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. EastNaples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April 2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk Neighbors located on the east side ofManchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely, J. _ 9.A.6 Ncip)es, FL"311//V Packet Pg. 152 Duncan 14631 Fern Lake Court Naples, FL 34114 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely /,rAj vN C�o� 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 153 L v / s A16GZ-" 1J 1,4,54-2- 41.1Cf46S`7-Er- PF - Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The tithing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April 2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely .c 9 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 154 9.A.6 L1��I7� // Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely Packet Pg. 155 14� �� 1Vll�s ►CL�E�CE� � - Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. EastNaples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newslefer/ENCA April 2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerek DIJA 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 156 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sinc( 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 157 x.609., 90 41r-5 yS WL -r,>&J- ,t '� Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 158 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: r pp r_�V) �( . -3 }eS, Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 0,16C raw_ 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 159 Vee-Kuom � Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely (�: 64,� Lu-�, 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 160 1 46 3 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA—April-2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 161 X/V C? 9�5- (,V pl-L 4E s ,C' Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016 Newsletter.pdo. High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely - til G�?il1B Packet Pg. 162 Naples Florida 3411 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April 2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naplcs Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 163 Reflection Lakes Community 14030 Mirror Court Naples Florida 34114 June 7, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 46 bonus units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing and limited opportunities for local employment. Habitat's website states "better" jobs are north of here; so why not place housing in the area where jobs are available? High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 14559 Marches�ec `7�ivQ NZ( ,\-es , �--L 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 164 9.A.6 Wl�.�.�=�►��- ► gI69 akA 65 VI'w,9- Die Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head L Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section a 2800 North Horseshoe Drive 6 Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's J rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit a. Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural o (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 a. single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. 2 The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically 3 organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As a homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, E racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. ,° East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and m limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.cominewsletter/ENCA April 2016 Newsletter.pdf). _ o a High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing N N o development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues c) are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. ui Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. E Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer U Q damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. E We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples M a Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely Packet Pg. 165 M I J'OhRsocu I 3 o5 c hn I e Y Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 166 " ZC)'_� cr Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat/ Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution .required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April 2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Rcscrvc and Rcflcction Lakcs. 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 167 Saving Our Woodland East of Manchester Drive Your neighbors on Manchester Drive need your support to prevent increased risk of crime, noise, and loss of property values within our community. We have composed a generic letter detailing reasons for opposing the rezoning of agricultural land east of Manchester Drive. This rezoning requested by Habitat for Humanity is for housing located 150 feet behind Reflection Lakes' property line. We ask that you sign the attached letter, add your name and address on the lines at the top of it, and mail to the following Collier County leadership overseeing this rezoning decision. We were told there is strength in numbers and hope our individual letters will be more persuasive. Please feel free to send to one or both men. Mr. Michael Bosi, Director of Zoning Services Section Mr. Thaddeus Cohen, Department Head / Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples Florida 34104 In appreciation, Residents on Manchester Drive Packet Pg. 168 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely —,,._)_Y 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 169 9.A.6 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely �i /� �rhf� � . .9-+�D A�•rhq P�� Packet Pg. 170 hw&_ -� Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 171 Q-xv& C l {� POUQ Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA._April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely, - 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 172 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 173 Ronald and Cynthia Reid 14641 Fem I ;; je ('mirt Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnapiescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdo. High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely Ip I Ronald and C nthia Reid 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 174 6/11/2018 I MG_6972.jpg F 9.A.6 Naples 1-Iorida 34114 3 1111 S. 201 9 \Michael T3osi. Director Vbaddcus Cohen, Dept. Mead Csrot�Ah Management Dept. ! Zoning Services Section 1HO North Horseshoe Drive laples, Fl, 34104 Deni -r Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's re?oning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning elle classification of 23.25-F/- acres of land zoned Dural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 181 to 300, generating 116 single -f tmily units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a .na.tural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The; turfing of Habitat / Netts Montgomery's informational sheeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents Have already occurred uvith teenagers in£t`inging on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently. racing cars„ noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. l=ast Maples currently has aro overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat viIlages) and limited opportutlities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the jab market (www.castuapicscivir-.com/newsletter/ENCA April2016Newsletter.pd#). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing develop=nt will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education iss€se: are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens bath our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors bated on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Ukes stand to suffer dainage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compannises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland. Arra tl insums distar a ktwexri developments. We Strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Res Tve and Reflection l,.,akcs. S%neemly E Packet Pg. 175 hUps:Ismail.googIe.com/maYu101#inbox/163eba268651 ea04?projector=l &mess age Pardd=0.1 lip Ez Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 176 9.A.6 MRP,K PI -4 uz."A 7 .S' 1 1,11 eye C T Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Deav r. Bosi nd Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely C- S4 6L Packet Pg. 177 BETH COU6260 G I g5VO �S"C--VI146 D 2 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA__,April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely C 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 178 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA Apri1_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 179 Gov 5� 7 Yi 4-!yCH l✓S Ic7Z /�,� . Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market(www.eastnaplescivic.con/newsletter/ENCA April 2016_ Newsletter pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. .,;Sincerely - 9.A.6 co m U 3 CL a� E 0 m U c a� c 0 a N N 0 U ui c m E z U 0 r Q c a� E U M a Packet Pg. 180 _ cy % CA Ctl,tAf-4 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 181 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely CIS � 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 182 G l &V, 141e03 Nla+n c hes-�e,r� Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 183 'As Aer , -Era i' J0. /-t a d a- rys3s ]+�r�n�G��,• �rrry Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 184 June 7, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Collier County Zoning Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 We are new residents of Reflection Lakes. We purchased our new retirement home in December of 2016 and just recently moved in since retirement. During our research looking for a place to retire, we were told by our builder's sales people that the lot we wished to purchase was a premium lot and paid extra. We were told that the land behind our lot was part of a preserve and that Collier County was preserving at least 1/3 of all land development for nature preserve so that population density would not end up like so many other Florida counties that were overbuilt. All of the above made us choose Collier County. We received a letter from Habitat for Humanity's attorney informing the people on our street, Manchester Drive, about the proposed addition of homes. Our whole block will be affected by this new development. Preserve will be very small with the addition of 116 more homes. Regal Acres residents have been noisy, loud music late at night, drag racing on Greenway, fireworks. The young adult children are cutting through our backyards and sometimes lingering, which scares us. We now feel that we will have to get a security system because of that fear. They have no business here in our community. Adding another 116 families to the site will cause us more distress, not to mention our property value depreciating due to these issues. If you vote yes to this rezoning, which we urge you not to, then we as residents of Reflection Lakes are asking that a buffer wall be part of the conditions of this being approved to build. There also seems to be multiple cars in every driveway therefore at least 200 to 400 additional cars will be using Greenway. Residents of that street were not happy at all at the information meeting at the Haitian Church the other night. They said speed traps were set up and the offenders were all from Regal Acres. The community is giving Habitat a bad name and that is one of the reasons every one is against this addition. We all knew it was there when we purchased, but had no idea that they were to expand. There is already a saturation of lower priced homes in this area. There are multiple mobile home parks and four communities built by Habitat. The Manatee schools are already overcrowded. Who will pay for this expansion, and why put all the low-income families into the same school? Not beneficial to students. In closing, we hope you will consider some of your already existing homeowners concerns and vote no to rezone this land residential. Sincerely�� to & James Vellis 4575 Manchester Drive, Reflection Lakes, Naples, FL 34114 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 185 —yamZ-- 5D✓1- R .-i 7 'Z I , b ru o P" A /J LV -a Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April 2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve'andkeflection Lakes. 5 erely CL_k_ltl-- 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 186 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion h -i inges on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The liming - of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. EastNaples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescMc.com/newsletter/ENCA_April 2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our devclopments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial ofrezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 187 Doris D'Agostina 14677 Sonoma Blvd. Nalites Flnrida 34114 June 18.-'`018 Mickwl Bosa Dircckrr Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Eicad (kowth Management Dept. r Zoiiirlg Ser,,iccs Scctiun 2300 Norih IJurscslluc I7nvt Naples. FI -34104 Dual Mr. Btr_+i and Mr. Colica: Our coal unity recently received ttot1fCUI1ilr1 and inforinati n rc.prdi%,, I lahkar for Iiumiliky's rt~ ming application. The; applleation intciu& u► ame111J the Remi Acres Rcsidenteal Plin-ncd [Inn Dc"' inpaw.nt by YC7011ilt" the clissif caliorl of 21.25+i- acres of land mmed Itural Agriculittrtl (A I Lo Lhe Rcgal :Acres RPUD. This increases tux si T, units born 184 to 300, generattn, 116 ti )gIc-1:1111ety' wa.; till' k)w im, nl xh;rjiv-lnc(wx: rusldenis on the described prolpciiy_ T k (txp aw%:4pt itfringes cul a natural habitaupreserve for deer herds, hears arxi eoyows, Tlic Napk3 Retcrvc and Rcflccticm Lakes hnmenwricn; voiecd their eu wems at two nx:c*les. llw t4nir�g of I labAait e Neal Mord�;txncry's inlbrmatiortal mc*, appeared su:ltcgically oreanrced to excltuic seasonal llunleuwncrs frond wcWiing it on Lhis cttrt4ruve:rsy. As htemeowncrs, %%-C Eule%ce ak.vltabll security issues SRCe semcfal incidents lwve already occurred with tecriagets infringing on Manchester Drive properiics that ahtn thk lue-serve, Most recently, Acing cars, noise. and trash Ix111tr m rcglrired natiftcatie-)sl to authorkics, East Naples currcntty lits an clvcrabundarrcc of kvty-nxxlerltc. hlxlsing 041labitat vigaGcsa and lirahkA uppaRLatitics fur tulskti[Ld labor. Most of the krw- incorrw units are nowhere cWw- to tllc job inarkct (www.castnapk seivic.ci)mncwsL-lier.'FNC'A_A1u•il_'01fi Nww lel(cr.Pdl}. I I it Ji-dcnsity housing creates chaNcti us for tlx: Manatee Scheid sirx.e it new housing &%-ck)pment will be their ne0bor westof4l snuth. Afthclurh scluxil ovvrtkiw - e.ducaliun issues arc troubling crime is also a factcw as we rKlw experience irx;idea s. regubrh' on weekends. Dtstruyitg further w•ucxilands only gviis Renin our de mandril ms for m(Xc trwtsiC'rtt iresp¢ ;sang and risk Nei_hLlurs kwated on rhe cast We u1'Maiwilester Dive in ltcfkxtiUn L.akvs stand to suncr damage oa 1t�tw'y to Owir prerxriy which dcn"IL,-, lixatn their reasonable- tLSc and llka<urc, Remnine e:rintprornisex wkta nm- provides primacy and security: the cxtemsrue WoWland area that insures drtance tx.tween dcveIopments. We swun:,'ly advocate torthe taenial ofrehlni-T, 23 aeresofagricullurat land that abut Naples Reserve and Rellctairt Lake,. Sincerely 9.A.ti Packet Pg. 188 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat/ Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April 2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 7! 7 4a All0 9.A.6 iel,71 7 Packet Pg. 189 June 8, 2018 Donna Fiala, Commissioner 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 Naples, FL 34112 Dear Commissioner Fiala; We are full-time residents living in Reflection Lakes and are writing to express our deep concern over Habitat For Humanity's rezoning request in order to expand Regal Acres. If Regal Acres is allowed to expand, the existing preserve that now supports wildlife will be greatly reduced and thinned out. Houses in Reflection Lakes and in Naples Reserve that look out onto this preserve will not be as desirable as when they were first purchased, and will lose value. We have driven through the current Regal Acres, and if the expansion ends up looking anything like this current community, the downward effect on housing prices will almost certainly be exacerbated and affect the whole community. In many new communities it is obvious that there will be further development coming. But people who purchased homes here, at least in the last couple of years, were given the impression that the preserve area was part of the community and would remain as it is. This is not the county's fault, but it contributes to the deep unhappiness we all feel about what's happening. It will affect the wildlife, the desirability of living here, and the value of our homes. Whatever the circumstances were when Habitat For Humanity first conceived this plan, at this point they are moving ahead with no regard for the residents who now live here. We feel it's very important that the county deny their request to proceed, and are requesting your hclp with this. Sincerely, David and Ashley Kenn 14717 Sonoma Blvd. Naples, FL 34114-8799 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 190 1 �W �� ► �. �� v, /, � .fir Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our commw�ity recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+1 acres of land zoned Rug Agricultural 1 ural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating e craThis single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat 1 Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.easmaplescivic.cominewsletter/ENCA April_2015 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow 1 education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now rer woodlands only opens bah nur� f ience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying futlidevelopments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sir rely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 191 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their conecrns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developmcnts for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. _ Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 192 /21 E7�f2 `. �bFSxT•IJSD ill el Naples Florida 34114 .lune 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horscshoc Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The tinning of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April 2016 Newsletter.pdt). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. [rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection .Lakes. Sincerely J I� 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 193 Rr Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/prescrve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. incerefy 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 194 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: 9.A.6 /Yc�3 ✓�a..r�o� P� Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April 2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely Packet Pg. 195 5 0j\1oj,,,7 �A , BJu�, Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept./ Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat/ Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April 2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side ofManchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security, the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 196 gam i Sus anvl e. c-0 Iden art Ir Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 197 A, Maples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat/ Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. EastNaples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April 2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 2 A 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 198 * L uAii� KosetiDE MMQAES� .b]-K1dE: Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now expenornue muldents regularly on wcckcads. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injwy to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely, 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 199 9.A.6 Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA Apri1_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens bolls our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. S' erely (�Iavd_ iFA + 44 sr �+r�s �F'/� %��L��TI �,v<s Packet Pg. 200 / ,,*PZAc f ! 0 I H y E, M c 2ciEK 1 yvb g, G 4A T,6 i ,_VV,6 Q Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to sumer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely Oily, P K4"I&f� 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 201 9.A.li At Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head 0 - Growth Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section U 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notifcation and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's J rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit a Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural o (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 a single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. c The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically 0 organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As a homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, E racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. ,° East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and a� limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the � job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA,._April Newsletter pdf). _ e a High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing N N o development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues v are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. ui Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. E Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer U Q damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security, the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. E We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples M a Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Packet Pg. 202 9.A.6 N les Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael BosL Director w Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head L Growth Management Dept / Zoning Services Section a 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's J rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit a Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural o (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 a single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This to expansion kfnnges on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. co The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. e The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's Wbrmatiionat meeting appeared st rab*cally organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As a homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties drat abut this preserve. Most recently, E racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. ,° East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and as limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the c job market (www eastnaplescivic.com tnewsietter/ENCA April 2016_Newsle ter gam). _ ° Q. as High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing o development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues v are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends_ w Destroying farther woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. E Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer a damage or injury to their properly which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure.; Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. E We strongly advocate for the dcgW of rezoning 23 acres of agricuttural land that abut Naples M Q Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely Packet Pg. 203 JOSCM I I IdDq �IV61P_Y- J o Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely � ":t 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 204 vLI,o ks- Albl�D Dom'. Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnapiescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April 2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 205 G Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnapiescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strnngly advocate .for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerel 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 206 Aloliell rakrn o Dr Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural laud that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 207 BrownleeMichael From: Janet OConnell <janetoc8@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 12:49 PM To: #`ialaDonna; bod@reflectionlakesatnaples.com; Jane Kraska; Errol Devore Subject: Fw: Your meeting last night in southeast Naples Categories: PRINTED Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android -_--_ Forwarded Message ---- From., "Janet OConnell" 1anetoc8 c@yahoo.corn> To: "nkouloheras�3a habitatcollier.org" <nkouloheras @?a habitatco!lier.org> Sent: Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:47 PM Subject: Your meeting last night in southeast Naples To Mr. Kouloheras: I was at the meeting last night and spoke about the overbuilding, etc and mentioned what has happened in Broward County. The attempt by your insulting and overcontrolling attorney to interrupt and take the microphone away from me was totally inappropriate and close to violating my 1st Amendment rights. I have always been a supporter of Habitat and often visit your Restore on 41 to buy some smallish item for a few dollars which is all I can afford. I have worked hard since age 16...1 am now closing in on 68. I have known very hard times and have never asked nor expected any help from anyone. I still do tutoring part time when available which has helped me to pay off the huge Hurricane Assessment of $1800 at Reflection Lakes. My final $600 payment is due on June 15th. I live on the cheaper street of Winchester Court (condo/villa area) and in April 2016 1 paid less than $200K. The Preserve behind us is exactly that. Your presentation was very slick, as our Master Association President said to you. He didn't even indicate his title, because most of us in Reflection Lakes are very down to earth, many years hard working, middle class folks. The majority of us are definitely NOT racist nor discriminatory. Yes, most of my life savings went into my condo/villa where I figured I could live peacefully for maybe 15-18 years before my life ends. Now your organization comes along wanting to build on the Preserve and I guess you consider it a DONE DEAL since you have already figured that the Rezoning will go your way! If it does, which will be very sad and beyond disturbing, our beauty will end and the density factor that you don't really care about will continue to take over and yes, this is already on the way to Broward County West! My other point and direct question is—What if you had a tract of land down in Port Royal or the Estates area of Marco island? How would you handle a major outcry of opposition from marry million dollar owners in luxury areas? I realize that this is a mute point. But you need to also look at your building in Broward County and how poorly maintained those have become! The years go by and blight comes because of overbuilding. The developers have made their many millions at our expense. You too have a huge budget of over $90million! I am a nobody who has dedicated her life to helping many thousands of students and parents over 30 years. I made a pittance salary and my state pension is pathetic, not to mention the lack of decent medical and dental benefits! My mother and I lived in a tiny house in Pompano Beach and then when I could afford a small condo in Lighthouse Point, I moved us to the other side of Federal Highway to a little bit better area. I drove every day out to Coral Springs. As I said, I never expected anything to be made easier for me. Your expectations are a bit too much since you think Rezoning is appropriate and you already have your plans to build. In my mind that is putting the cart before the horse, but you must already know that the winds are going to blow favorably your way. Moreover, there are plenty of affordable housing dwellings off of Manatee Road and along 41 west of here. And by the way, how on earth do you expect the extra kids to be taken into the already very sad, decrepit Manatee schools that Collier County Schools could care less about improving?! Frankly, those portables should be condemned. I am a realist. I am also 100% honest and have always done the right thing, Finally, your lawyer should also do the right thing and at least send me an email apology. Respectfully, Ms Janet M. O'Connell 14160 Winchester Ct. #1801 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 208 BrownleeMichael From: Janet OConnell <janetoc8@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2018 9:49 AM To: FialaDonna Subject: A followup to yesterday's email Categories: ATTENTION, PRINTED Hello again Mrs. Fiala...l had sent a decent email to the Collier Pres. of Habitat yesterday. His reply back to me was not nice. I can forward it to you if you want to read it. He accused me of not doing my homework, not living long enough in Collier County, and he has no interest in even knowing about Habitat in Broward County. I replied back that I have lived in Collier Cty for 14 years, that as a retired educator with advanced degrees (also Phi Beta Kappa from the University of Florida) I always have done My Homework, and that he should drive over to Broward it he doesn't believe my facts! Frankly, I am now angry which I seldom allow myself to become! Our Master Board at Reflection Lakes and Naples Reserve are also angry and what Habitat needs to understand is: WE DO NOT WANTTO BE REZONED FROM OUR CURRENT AGRICULTURAL TO WHAT ANY DEVELOPER WANTS IN ORDER TO BUILD. Habitat's attitude with their nasty attorney wants NO OPPOSITION and they are determined to get what they want. Furthermore, Habitat's normal Modus Operandi is to go into blighted areas to improve housing for those less fortunate. Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes are NOT BLIGHTED, nor do we want to have that happen since our investments here range from $220K-$lmillion plus(especially at Naples Reserve)! But again the point is to stop the building in our Preserved area which is ZONED AGRICULTURAL! This has nothing to do with racism or discrimination. We have a diversity in RL, and my neighbors are minority and great people who work very hard and pay a very high rent! You will get flooded with mail and emails which are now becoming a full fledged campaign. We are begging you and the other County Commissioners to NOT REZONE OUR AREA. Please do NOT make this a DONE DEAL for Habitat which is what they already figure they have. We recently lost to the Storage facility that is being built across from Naples Reserve Blvd entrance on 41. We will NOT stand idly by and accept any rezoning to allow any additional acreage to be bought and built on by any entity that destroys our beautiful Preserve area. As always, thank you a million times for your hard work! Most respectfully, Ms. Janet M. O'Connell Reflection Lakes Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 209 BrownleeMichael From: Janet OConnell <janetoc8@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2018 9:31 AM To: FialaDonna Subject: No Rezoning to benefit Habitat Categories: ATTENTION, PRINTED Thank you Commissioner Fiala for Micael's reply. There are a few more serious issues that prove the bullying tactics of Habitat. More children going to the Manatee schools that are already Title Nine and in terrible condition... is the Collier School Board going to build much needed new buildings over on that site? Where is that money going to come from? It doesn't seem likely that Habitat is going to contribute any money from their $93 million budget to help the Manatee schools! Is the Federal government going to supply more free meals, etc for these additional children? Lely High School is also overcrowded! Now Greenway Road. Naples Reserve closed the use of that road for construction trucks over a year ago. That road is in terrible condition and will need to be redone and improved. Will the County provide money for that since Habitat won't? Also the Collier Sherrif does go back into Regal Estates 1 quite often for crime calls. Building a wall with foliage by Habitat that will cost $600,000 out of Habitat's coffers is now NOT a guarantee as you heard the other night from Habitat's Collier President. He made it clear that that would be a lot of money that Habitat may NOT be able to fork out! Well, how much more duping is the Collier County Commission going to stand for? Our communities are NOT BLIGHTED. Habitat normally goes into blighted areas to do some good work. Unfortunately, the improvements in these blighted areas do not last, because the so-called "sweat equity" is not long term. I have seen this in NY and in Broward County, FL As a retired Florida educator on a very limited budget who has worked very hard all of my life and NEVER expected any handout from anyone, this entire "Bill of Goods" smells terrible. We do NOT WANT REZONING TO satisfy any additional building that also has a huge potential for corruption. Florida, where I have lived most of my life, has always had too much corruption by developers, politicians, local governments. Collier County was once a safe haven and known for decency. Along with out of control building now in full swing, many of our local leaders are being swept along to satisfy those with the money responsible for Collier's reputation going downhill. This is totally reprehensible. So much corruption destroyed Broward. The lessons are very clear and being ignored now in Collier. ( I will now fade into the background as many others will also be standing up.) Respectfully, Janet M. O'Connell Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 210 9.A.6 BrownleeMichael From: Lenore Meurer <lenorem@aol com> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2018 9:06 PM Subject: Habitat for Humanity NIM for more low income housing 614118 attached Attachments: Habitathomebuyer (1) (1).pdf, HFH Regal Acres NIM meeting 642018, adding more low income housing to over concentration in East Naples. pdf Categories: ATTENTION, PRINTED NIM Well of course its scheduled in dead of summer with noone around, in the middle of a rain storm like last year to deter attendance and opposition. No surprises there, this is more low income housing to add to Regal acres out on 41, like we need anymore. I want to require where they are moving from since Cormac insisted at the last AHAC that these people were Naples residents? and from here, though I never knew that we had such a huge Haitian population. Where are they employed, can't look like the past incomplete documents which confirmed noone working in East Naples, not even close. Take a look.. I am submitting my questions, such as how they comply with the statute to avoid overconcentration of low income housing in this target area and do they have that assessment? No bonus housing or any AF housing should be approved without establishing a methodogy for criteria that ensures compliance with the statute. We have 52% of all Affordable housing in Collier County located right here in East Naples, we know there is no way they comply with the law. Who is responsible to ensure Collier staff comply with the law and apply methodology/ assessment with every development application submitted? Where is the data that proves these areas are not saturated? Do all development applications evaluate the equitable distribution of AF housing? Should they? Obviously no one is concerned about the big picture since we have such a huge disparity in housing numbers. Will North Naples citizens be concerned about the housing disparity when we implement bussing their children to Avalon, and other East Naples schools? We are definitely heading in that direction folks just like Fort Myers, because its unconstitutionalto not provide a quality education to children in schools having up to 98% economically disadvantaged attending. This must be reported at the Federal level and immediately addressed. While Collier staff can continue to ignore the statute regarding overconcentration in low income housing in East Naples, there is no ignoring the LAW. We need to demand enforcement of the law to protect us, our children and our communities. Please attend this NIM and be heard, ask these critical questions, where is the analysis that safeguards our communities? We need the data analysis since we must prevent further over saturation and concentration. Habitat has the Largest Affordable Housing Communities in the WORLD located right here, in little Naples, its what we're known as, 'Habitat County' and they're buying up land out on 41 and everywhere, and we let this happen, we've done nothing to stop it, and we will suffer with the repurcussions of doing nothing, saying nothing... LENORE MEURER Packet Pg. 211 PRESIDENT Lely Landings Mouthwest Florida Upor~aoLcom 239--234-6236 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 212 PAVESE NEALF MONTGOMERY 11—AW.FM.----M. �- Direct dial: (239) 336-5235 Eraetl: c 1833 Hendry Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 1 P.O. Drawer 1507, Fort Myor9, Florida 33902-1507 (239) 334-2195 1 Fax (239) 332-2243 May 18, 2018 Dear Property Owner: 9.A.6 ease bie ad sbd'th4tNa`Git6t or umMI ofCollier-Cour-ty— a`s subrriu�fe"a`lseti°�tz-Co Pl1Cer Coun�fiy -- - seeking Rezoning approval for the following described property: Property located on the west side of Greenway Road to be accessed via Majestic Circle The petitioner is asking the County to approve an application to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by changing the zoning classification of 23.15+I- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This change will amend the master plan to include the additional land and will increase the permissible number of dwelling units from 184 to 346. The request includes an affordable housing density bonus agreement for the added 23.15 acres that will generate 46 bonus Units for low or moderate income residents on the described property. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of the intended development associated with this application. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday, June 4 at 5:30 p.m. at the First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples located at 14600 Tasniami Trail E, Naples, FL 34114. At this meeting the petitioner will make every effort to illustrate how the property will be developed and to answer any questions. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please cDI me. NM/kac 4632 VINCENNFS BLVD., SUrrE 101 CAPE CORAi, FLORIDA 33944 (239)542-3148 Sincerely, N 4524 GtDN CLC1B RoAD, SUM, 203 WFsr PALM $EACH, Fu)RwA 33415 (561) 4714365 N d L V Q M M r 0 0 0 0 N J a N O D a co m Packet Pg. 213 BrownleeMichael From: Ronald Wahl <rkwah198@msn.com> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2018 10:05 PM To: FialaDonna Subject: Habitat for Humanity Regal Acres If Categories: ATTENTION, PRINTED Dear Commissioners: We are very concerned about the consideration of sacrificing preserve land for housing. Preserve land was designated so land would be preserved. We all thought that was an environmental responsibility. WE ARE RESIDENTS OF REFLECTION LAKES. TAKE A LOOK AT WOW REFLECTION LAKES WAS FORCED TO PRESERVE LAND IN HENDRY COUNTY WHICH IS A HARDSHIP FOR OUR COMMUNITY! WHY WOULD YOU LET HABITAT FOR HUMANITY BUILD REGAL ACRES ON PRESERVE LAND???? Ron and Sheila Wahl 14704 Cranberry Ct. Naples, FL 344114 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 214 BrownleeMlchael From: Lynn Livingston <redwingnut1@me.corna Sent: Frkday, June 08, 2018 10;30 AM To: FialaDonna Subject: Regal Acres 11 Categories: ATTENTION, PRINTED My family is strongly opposed to any expansion of the Habitat for Humanity development called Regal Acres, which we understand will be called Regal Acres I1. The current community called Regal Acres is an eyesore. 80% of the community has homes that are not maintained and yards that are worse. Some of the homes have 3-4 cars in the driveway, even during working hours. These are supposed to be single family homes but obviously have extended families that have moved in. Even now, we can hear the noise and loud partying at night from existing Habitat homes. Teenagers from Regal Acres have been coming along the canal and trespassing on Reflection Lakes private property. We have seen groups of 3-8 teenagers run through our and our neighbors' yards. Having more Habitat homes only 150 feet from the east side of Reflection Lakes will be a horrible eyesore, more noise and possible increase in trespassing. Respectfully submitted, Aubrey Livingston 14587 Manchester Dr Naples, FL 34114 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 215 BrownleeMichael From: Tom Custer <tcuster49@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 7:16 PM To: FialaDonna Subject: HH proposed expansion to Regal Acres. Categories: ATTENTION, PRINTED Donna, I have received your Tidbits for some time now and understand you have petitioned your other commissioners to appropriately distribute affordable housing developments equally in Collier county and not focus on East and South Naples. I agree whole heartedly with that to maintain proper diversity in the neighborhoods as being economically sound and essential for property values and diversification. Mike Yancon, sent you an email asking for support to defeat the proposed Zoning Change Habitat for Humanity is proposing by expanding the existing Regal Acres to add approximately 118 more homes that will be contiguous to Naples Reserve. Many in the surrounding neighborhoods attended the first meeting on June 4th at the Haitian Church and vehemently opposed it for the reasons noted above. I am Mike Yancon"s neighbor and will be adversely affected by this expansion if approved as well along with many families along the fence line there. What help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.. In addition, I have been searching Collier County's websites to find a graphic map that inidicates all the Habitat communities and all other affordable housing communities and how they are populated throughout Naples. This would clearly show all the concentration areas for discussion. Please help with this so we can defer growth here and relocate to other areas of Naples. Respectfully submitted and look forward to hearing from you soon. I believe the next meeting with the planning commission or zoning board for this request in June 23 or. 24th. Thanks so much - Tom Custer Thanks - Tom C. 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 216 BrownleeMichael From: Meltem Tanner <ems_meltem@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 12:32 AM To: SolisAndy; FialaDonna; SaundersSurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; ems-matt@msn.com Subject: Habitat for }humanity Regal Acres II Categories: PRINTED Hi Dear Commissioners, I am a homeowner at Reflection Lakes, Manchester Dr. We regretfully found out that there would be a possibility to replace the agricultural zone in Regal Acres II ( off Rt 41 and Greenway Rd ) to a housing project. When we've purchased our property we were assured by Neal Communities that we would have a large preserve in the back of our property that is not buildable. This is the only reason why we purchased our property. Also I believe there should have more green space in our county. I feel it is becoming out of hand when I see ongoing construction all over the place and replacing our beautiful nature with ugly structures. You and other commissioners should plan very well, Please don't let our beautiful community become like any other city. We will seek our rights through legal systems in case of a decision that would destroy our preserve or replace it with housing. It's imperative that you and other commissioners make your decisions responsibly. Thank you Meltem Tanner 14359 Manchester Drive Naples, FL 34114 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 217 BrownleeMichael From: Janet OConnell <janetoc8@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, .tune 27, 2018 5:49 PM To: FialaDonna Subject: Habitat Categories: ATTENTION, PRINTED Hello again Mrs. Fiala ... just an update concerning our most recent meeting last evening (June 26th) with Habitat's President in our clubhouse per his request. We again faced another very difficult meeting, as Habitat's President considers it a DONE DEAL and that we need to accept it. He had two Xeroxes: one showing a viewpoint of scope/line of elevation from us to their tops of many little houses; the second was a map in color showing their development and proximity to Reflection Lakes. This upset most of us and his monotonous litany of descriptions, etc. We fired back with many questions and also making it clear that we want NO REZONING AND NO FURTHER BUILDING ENCROACHING ON OUR PRESERVE AND INCLUSIVE THEREOF. HE could have cared less but said maybe he could include a fence. We said A TALL WALL WOULD BE NECESSARY. I brought up the Manatee schools and would Habitat be donating some of their $93 Million to help on that and also Greenway Road? He said that he's not concerned about the schools, because according to him there are 16 empty ciassroomsl When I asked if these were damaged portables, he would not reply. As for Greenway Rd he left that up in the air with us presuming that the County will have to fund that disastrous road I He saic the $93 Million has to be allocated for buying more land behind us for their 184-300 little houses and the mortgages for the owners! Plus the density will be 5 units per acre. We all feel very defeated and angry. We hope that the Rezoning will NOT happen and are begging the County Commission, Planning Commission, and Zoning to make an intelligent decision to keep our Preserve and disputed tract of land Agricultural. Again and again—The building MUST STOP. Please share with your colleagues. Most respectfully, Ms Janet O'Connell ( retired Broward County educator) Reflection Lakes Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 218 14534 Manchester Drive Naples Florida 34114 June 27, 2018 Collier County Commissioners and Planning Commission Liaison Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Bellows, Ms. Fiala, Mr. Solis, Mr. Saunders, Ms. Taylor, Mr McDaniel, Mr. Mark Strain: Our community gathered for a meeting with Habitat for Humanity representatives last evening, June 26, 2018 in Reflection Lakes. The goal was to reach agreement to stop the rezoning or facilitate compromise via additional building plan modifications to reduce noise and privacy to those residents bordering the preserve area separating both developments. Increased housing from 184 to 300 units will only increase noise and opportunity for trespassing to our quiet retirement neighborhood. This was the second meeting and this the second letter Reflection Lakes homeowners have voiced their concerns. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes not only paid larger premium fees for lots that were to border permanent woodland, but stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. As discussed with Habitat at the meeting, we strongly advocate for the DENIAL OF REZONING. In the event you refuse to support our community, we expect the following at Habitat's expense: 1. No less than an eight -foot solid wall between developments to block noise and trespass. 2. Move the playground and basketball court closer to Greenway Road from current planned location 3. Do not construct 22 Habitat homes closest to the preserve thus maintaining the preserve's trees and allowing room for a barrier wall on Habitat's property. 4. Consider the financial impact of upgrading roads leading to these Habitat homes as current conditions threaten optimal access by emergency personnel and vehicles. Sincerely Robert J. and Vicki L. Smith 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 219 BrownleeMichael From: Ashley Kennedy <ashinosh@icloud.com> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 10:16 AM To: FialaDonna Subject: Concern from Reflection Lakes Categories: PRINTED 14717 Sonoma Blvd, Naples Florida 34114 June 28, 2018 Collier County Commissioners and Planning Commission Liaison Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Ms. Fiala, Our community gathered for a meeting with Habitat for Humanity representatives last evening, June 26, 20[8 in Reflection Lakes. The goal was to reach agreement to stop the rezoning or facilitate compromise via additional building plan modifications to reduce noise and privacy to those residents bordering the preserve area separating both developments, Increased housing from 184 to 300 units will only increase noise and opportunity for trespassing to our quiet retirement neighborhood. This was the second meeting and this the second letter Reflection Lakes homeowners have voiced their concerns. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes not only paid larger premium fees for lots that were to border permanent woodland, but stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. As discussed with Habitat at the meeting, we strongly advocate for the DENIAL OF REZONING. In the event you refuse to support our community, .ve expect the following at Habitat's expense. I . No less than an eight -foot solid wall between developments to block noise and trespass. 2. Move the playground and basketball court closer to Greenway Road from current planned location 3. Do not construct 22 Habitat homes closest to the preserve thus maintaining the preserve's trees and allowing room for a barrier wall on Habitat's property. 4. Consider the financial impact of upgrading roads leading to these Habitat homes as current conditions threaten optimal access by emergency personnel and vehicles. Sincerely, Ashley Allison Kennedy 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 220 9.A.6 SaboJames From: BellowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 11:33 AM To: SaboJames Subject: FW: Regal II FYI R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Co*ie-r C,'014-Ktty Eiceeding expedtations. evervda}y' Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gi/eXivgT. From: Office Manager[mailto:officemgr@kamconcrete.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 11:12 AM To: Strain Mark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov>; BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; Fiala Donna <Donna.Fiala @coIliercountyfl.gov>; SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaundersBurt <Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfi.gov>; TaylorPenny <Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov>; McDaniel Bill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfI.gov> Subject: Regal II Packet Pg. 221 Maples Florida 34114 June 271 2018 Collier County Commissioners and Planning Commission L Growth Management Dept. I Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Bellows, Ms. Fiala, Mr. Soli McDaniel, Mr. Mark Strain: Jur community gathered for a meeting with Habitat for Hur. ,lune 26, 2018 in Reflection Lakes. The goal was to reach ag =facilitate compromise via additional building plan modificat those residents bordering the preserve area separating both d 184 to 300 units will only increase noise and opportunity foi neighborhood. This was the second meeting and this the second letter Refle their concerns. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable secur already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester D Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developn and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester C paid larger premium fees for lots that were to border permar. damage or injury to their property which derogates from the Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and sect insures distance between developments. z Packet Pg. 222 9.A.6 Blessings, Sue Thomas 863-223-5176 L U Q Under Florida taw, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. M M ti r O O O ti r O N J a N O a W It v (C Packet Pg. 223 9.A.6 SaboJames From: BellowsRay Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 11:36 AM To: SaboJames Subject: FW: Concern from Reflection Lakes FYI R" Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463: Fax: 239.252.6350 C,"0*6-r County Exceeding expedtations, everyday! Tell us how we are doing by faking our Zoning Division Survey at https:/1goo.gl/eXivgT. .............. From: Ashley Kennedy [mailto:ashinosh@icloud.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 10:14 AM To: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Concern from Reflection Lakes 14717 Sonoma Blvd. Naples Florida 34114 June 28, 2018 Collier County Commissioners and Planning Commission Liaison Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bellows,: Our community gathered for a meeting with Habitat for Humanity representatives last evening, June 26, 2018 in Reflection Lakes. The goal was to reach agreement to stop the rezoning or facilitate compromise via additional building plan modifications to reduce noise and privacy to those residents bordering the preserve area separating both developments. Increased housing from 184 to 300 units will only increase noise and opportunity for trespassing to our quiet retirement neighborhood. This was the second meeting and this the second letter Reflection Lakes homeowners have voiced their concerns. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes not only paid larger premium fees for lots that were to border permanent woodland, but stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. As discussed with Habitat at the meeting, we strongly advocate for the DENIAL OF REZONING. In the event you refuse to support our community, we expect the following at Habitat's expense: 1. No less than an eight -foot solid wall between developments to block noise and trespass. 2. Move the playground and basketball court closer to Greenway Road from current planned location Packet Pg. 224 9.A.6 3. Do not construct 22 Habitat homes closest to the preserve thus maintaining the preserve's trees and allowing room for a barrier wall on Habitat's property. 4. Consider the financial impact of upgrading roads leading to these Habitat homes as current conditions threaten optimal access by emergency personnel and vehicles. Sincerely, Ashley Allison Kennedy N L Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. at m M M ti r O O O ti r O N J a N O a Packet Pg. 225 111'!77 6aa,°Y0,NcJ �?r2 Naples Florida 34114 .Tune 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25-/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south_ Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely �I 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 226 I 9.A.6 Y�^,, hs km k Naples Florida 34114 '1 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen_ Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- act of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property_ This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meefting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy_ As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve_ Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor_ Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic-com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends_ Destroying fiwther woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sineea+ely 7&LidkCA1b) Packet Pg. 227 nTa�te�,, P.AO, Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 1844 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016_Newsletter.pdo. High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 228 C IF - Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnapicscivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April 2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 229 Naples f1brida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth ':Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr: Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+'- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat 1 Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnaplescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016_Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 230 BrownleeMichael From: Kim Pojeta 2 <pojetabodrl@gmai} com> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 7:27 PM To: FialaDonna Subject: tonight meeting at the church on Regal Acres Categories: PRINTED First thank you for attending. And secondly, I apologize for handing the mike back when I finished my question. But I asked if Habitat looks at affordable housing as a whole throughout the county by district prior to choosing a location to build since Collier residents work all over the county too. The response was about land value/cost. I suggested they consider looking at all affordable housing locations including existing value properties that can be bought by district before determining where need is..... and looking at land in areas that lack affordable housing even though the bottom dollar of the product may be higher because commuting 45 minutes to work or more is tough too. also realized after I left that looking by district and by build -able amounts of district could be valuable too. Thanks again for attending and for your support, Kim 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 231 BrownleeMichael From: Janet OConnell <janetoc8@yahoo.corn> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 9:59 AM To: FialaDonna Subject: Habitat on our Preserve Zoned Agricultural Categories: ATTENTION, PRINTED Hello again Mrs. Fiala ... I have been one of your very loyal supporters ever since I moved here from Broward County in 2004. Thank you for talking to me as you were leaving the meeting last night. More people spoke after you left, including another RL owner who expressed her disgust especially at that nasty female lawyer. I don't know if you noticed that she did interrupt me and reached out to take the microphone away from me! I told her that I had every right to speak. It sounds like Habitat considers this a DONE DEAL, since the other Commissioners will give them the Rezoning! It's even much worse than the approval of the recent storage facility across from Naples Reserve Blvd entrance! I said what I did last night because I watched Broward County get over -developed over my 30 plus years over there. The end result in Broward is terrible... traffic a total nightmare, high crime, disgusting density, and even Lighthouse Point where I had a cute condo looks old and crappy. Cora! Springs is now also horrific. I'm sure my prediction for Naples is correct if the County leaders continue to sell off to the developers including Habitat. It doesn't surprise me what you said about your trying to get a few decent stores out this way. Look at Freedom Square and the blight there! The old Kmart building remains a huge problem. Even Dollar Tree is moving into a much needed new location behind the 5th/3rd Bank across 41! You have tried so hard but your colleagues don't care. PLEASE STAND UP TO THEM AND TRY TO STOP THE REZONING! Yes, Habitat does much good but to listen to their slick presentation along with their horrible lawyer was so AWFUL. They even have land down by the Links! Habitat in Broward has built disgusting homes that are NOT maintained. So, it looks like Collier County could be renamed Broward County West in the near future! Horror. is this what our Commission wants? We the People and owners with our lifetime investments sunk into Collier County do NOT. I'm guessing what I'm saying here will not make a difference, a very hard pill for me to swallow as a retired FL educator. Most Respectfully, Janet M. O'Connell 14160 Winchester Ct. #1801 Naples, FL 34114 Reflection Lakes Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 232 6t1A-1IVC E S7aKEs TRI -T7 6%(8118 /-12_79 -' ^2 c ZAie,P 0A Naples Florida 34114 June 8, 2018 Michael Basi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+I- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat 1 Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www.eastnapiescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016 Newsletter.pdf). High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 233 e �s Naples Flonda 341 1 June 8, 2018 Michael Bosi, Director Thaddeus Cohen, Dept. Head Growth Management Dept. / Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi and Mr. Cohen: Our community recently received notification and information regarding Habitat for Humanity's rezoning application. This application intends to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by rezoning the classification of 23.25+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This increases housing units from 184 to 300, generating 116 single-family units for low or moderate -income residents on the described property. This expansion infringes on a natural habitat/preserve for deer herds, bears and coyotes. The Naples Reserve and Reflection lakes homeowners voiced their concerns at two meetings. The timing of Habitat / Neal Montgomery's informational meeting appeared strategically organized to exclude seasonal homeowners from weighing in on this controversy. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Most recently, racing cars, noise, and trash pollution required notification to authorities. East Naples currently has an overabundance of low -moderate housing (4 Habitat villages) and limited opportunities for unskilled labor. Most of the low- income units are nowhere close to the job market (www_eastnapiescivic.com/newsletter/ENCA_April_2016_Newsletter.pdt)_ High-density housing creates challenges for the Manatee School since a new housing development will be their neighbor west of 41 south. Although school overflow / education issues are troubling, crime is also a factor as we now experience incidents regularly on weekends. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. We strongly advocate for the denial of rezoning 23 acres of agricultural land that abut Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Sincerely 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 234 Kevin and Dawn Chard 14546 Lanier Court Naples Florida 34114 June 29, 2018 Collier County Commissioners and Planning Commission Liaison Growth Management Dept. l Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Mr. Bosi, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Bellows, Ms. Fiala, Mr. Solis, Mr. Saunders, Ms. Taylor, Mr. McDaniel, Mr. Mark Strain: Our community gathered for a meeting with Habitat for Humanity representatives on June 26, 2018 in Reflection Lakes. The goal was to reach agreement to stop the rezoning or facilitate compromise via additional building plan modifications to reduce noise and privacy to those residents bordering the preserve area separating both developments. Increased housing from 184 to 300 units will only increase noise and opportunity for trespassing to our quiet retirement neighborhood. This was the second meeting and this the second letter Reflection Lakes homeowners have voiced their concerns. As homeowners, we foresee inevitable security issues since several incidents have already occurred with teenagers infringing on Manchester Drive properties that abut this preserve. Destroying further woodlands only opens both our developments for more transient trespassing and risk. Neighbors located on the east side of Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes not only paid larger premium fees for lots that were to border permanent woodland, but stand to suffer damage or injury to their property which derogates from their reasonable use and pleasure. Rezoning compromises what now provides privacy and security; the extensive woodland area that insures distance between developments. As discussed with Habitat at the meeting, we strongly advocate for the DENIAL OF REZONING. In the event you refuse to support our community, we expect the following at Habitat's expense: No less than an eight -foot solid wall between developments to block noise and trespass. Move the playground and basketball court closer to Greenway Road from current planned location 3. Do not construct 22 Habitat homes closest to the preserve thus maintaining the preserve's trees and allowing room for a barrier wall on Habitat's property. 4. Consider the financial impact of upgrading roads leading to these Habitat homes as current conditions threaten optimal access by emergency personnel and vehicles. Sincerely, Dawn and Kevin Chard 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 235 REGAL ACRES II RPUD (PL20170001733) Application and Supporting Documents September 6, 2018 CCPC Hearing Prepared August 15, 2018 by: ENGINEERING Post Office Box 1550 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, Florida 33902-1550 (239) 334-0046 EB642 I 9.A.7 I Packet Pg. 236 ENGINEERING October 30, 2017 Nancy Gundlach, Zoning Services Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Regal Acres II RPUD PUD Rezone Application PL20170001733 Dear Ms. Gundlach: On behalf of our client, Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, please find the enclosed PUD Rezone (PUDZ) Application for the above referenced project. The applicant is requesting a zoning change from the Rural Agricultural (A) and Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning districts to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the Regal Acres II RPUD, to add lands to the existing RPUD for a maximum of 116 additional residential units on 23.15 acres of property; and, consideration and approval of an affordable housing density bonus agreement authorizing the developer to utilize affordable housing bonus density units in the development of this project located on the west side of Greenway Road, east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), and north of U.S. 41, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 05-36. Please note that the Pre -Application Meeting indicated 23.84 acres, with a request for 5 units per acre, resulting in 119 units. However, per detailed surveying information, the acreage is specified in this RPUD application as 23.15 acres, with a request for 5 units per acres, resulting in 116 units. The following information is included for review and approval: 1. One (1) check in the amount of $16,125 for the PUD Rezone Application fee, Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review fee, Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet fee, Transportation Major Study Review and Legal Advertising fees. A separate $500 check for the Transportation Methodology Meeting is also provided. 2. Certificate of Affordable Housing Expedited Fast Track Review 3. Affordable Housing Bonus Density Agreement in Strike-thru Format 4. PUD Rezone Application 5. Attachment 1 - List Identifying Ownership (Disclosure of Interest) 6. Attachment 2 - Parcel List 7. Pre -Application Meeting Notes 8. Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2350 Stanford Court . Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 434-0333 . Fax (239) 434-9320 Packet Pg. 237 9. Covenant of Unified Control, signed and notarized 10. Completed Addressing Checklist 11. Warranty Deeds 12. Boundary Survey, signed and sealed 13. Current Aerial Photograph with FLUCFCS Codes (included in Environmental Data Report) 14. Evaluation Criteria Narrative 15. Environmental Data Report 16. Protected Species Survey (included in Environmental Data Report) 17. Traffic Impact Study 18. School Impact Analysis Application 19. List of Permitted and Conditional Uses (Exhibit A) 20. Residential Development Standards (Exhibit B) 21. PUD Master Plan (Exhibit C) 22. Legal Description (Exhibit D) 23. List of Deviations and Justifications (Exhibit E) 24. List of Development Commitments (Exhibit F) 25. Original PUD Ordinance and Master Plan 26. Revised Original PUD Document with Strike-thru, noting it is proposed for repeal We look forward to working with you and appreciate your coordination of this rezoning application through the review and public hearing process. If you have any questions or require further information, please contact me at (239) 280-4331. Sincerely, �at&'LL- 9CT� Laura DeJohn, AICP Director of Planning & Landscape Architecture Johnson Engineering, Inc. 20170078-000 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 238 APPLICATION r a Packet Pg. 239 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD of PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑■ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A. -F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A. -F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. Address: 11145 Tamiami Trail East City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34113 Telephone: (239) 775-0036 Cell: Fax: (239) 775-0477 E -Mail Address: nkouloheras@habitatcollier.org Name of Agent: Laura DeJohn, AICP Firm: Johnson Engineering, Inc. Address: 2122 Johnson Street city: Fort Myers State: FL ZIP: 33901 Telephone (239) 334-0046 Cell (239) 229-1726 E -Mail Address: Idejohn@johnsoneng.com Fax: (239) 334-3661 Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. 9.A.7 2/21/2017 Page 1 of 16 Packet Pg. 240 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Please complete the following information, if space is inadequate use additional sheets and attach to the completed application packet. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: L7 C. R Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership See Attachment 1. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the lercentage or inieresi: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership 9.A.7 2/21/2017 Page 2 of 16 Packet Pg. 241 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership GHU, LLC parcel #00737720006 under contract for purchase by Habitat for Humanity, Inc. See Attachment 1. Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired See Attachment 2. ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 9.A.7 2/21/2017 Page 3 of 16 Packet Pg. 242 9.A.7 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: Rural Agricultural (A) & RPUD Zoning district(s) to the RPUD zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Vacant/Existing Regal I Residential Neighborhood Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Original PUD Name: Regal Acres Ordinance No.: 05-36 Residential PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 12 5Ls 26E A portion of the property is platted as Regal Acres Lot: Block: Subdivision: Subdivision and Regal Acres Phase One Replat. Metes & Bounds Description: See Exhibit D for the legal description for existing Regal Acres and proposed addition. 49 87-90 00737720006, 00741100104, Plat Book: 54 Page #: 48-50 Property I.D. Number: 00737760008, 00741080606. 00738280008 resp of Size of Property: 1,298 avg. ft. X 2,009 avg. ft.= 2,609,244 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 59.9 acres Address/ General Location of Subject Property: On the west side of Greenway Road, approximately 0.85 miles north of US 41. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): ❑ Commercial ❑■ Residential ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: 2/21/2017 ❑ Industrial Page 4 of 16 Packet Pg. 243 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: West Wind Estates Condo Association Mailing Address: 301 Joseph Lane City: Naples State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Zip: 34114 City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: 9.A.7 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: 2/21/2017 Page 5 of 16 Packet Pg. 244 Zoning Land Use N RPUD & A Residential & Vacant/Mobile Home/Single Family S MH & A Mobile Home/Single Family/Mobile Home E A/RFMUO-Receiving Overlay Agriculture & Single Family W PUD & MH Residential (Preserve) & Mobile Home If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: West Wind Estates Condo Association Mailing Address: 301 Joseph Lane City: Naples State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Zip: 34114 City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: 9.A.7 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: 2/21/2017 Page 5 of 16 Packet Pg. 244 9.A.7 CAer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 2/21/2017 Page 6 of 16 Packet Pg. 245 9.A.7 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E, of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. OT the Haministrative (-oae Tor the NnVI proceaural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue Drocessine or otherwise activelv Dursue the rezonine. amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. 2/21/2017 Page 7 of 16 Packet Pg. 246 9.A.7 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. Address: 11145 Tamiami Trail East City: Naples State: FL Telephone: (239) 775-0036 Cell: E -Mail Address: nkouloheras@habitatcollier.org Address of Subject Property (If available): City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34114 ROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 1/ 5/ 26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: ZIP: 34113 Fax: (239) 775-0477 Only a portion of the property is platted. Metes & Bounds Description: See Exhibit D. 00737720006,00741100104, Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00737760008, 00741080606, 00738280008 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System a. County Utility System b. City Utility System ✓❑ C. Franchised Utility System b. City Utility System d. Private System (Well) ❑ C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Package Treatment Plant H (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System ❑ I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑✓ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be Served: 116 dwelling units Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 118 GPM Average Daily: 41'412 GPD B. Sewer -Peak: 78 GPM Average Daily: 27,608 GPD If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: August 2019 2/21/2017 Page 8 of 16 Packet Pg. 247 9.A.7 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. N/A Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Acknowledged. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 2/21/2017 Page 9 of 16 Packet Pg. 248 CAer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for planned unit development ( PUD) zoning. We hereby designate , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Owner Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this who is personally known to me or has produced Printed Name day of 201_ by as identification. Notary Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) 9.A.7 2/21/2017 Page 10 of 16 Packet Pg. 249 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ■❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. 9.A.7 REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary ❑ ❑ ❑ Completed Application with required attachments ❑ x❑ ❑ Pre -application meeting notes ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 ❑ Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 2 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 2 ❑ ❑ Warranty Deed(s) 3 X❑ ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 2 x❑ ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 4 X❑ ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 4 ❑ x❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 5 X❑ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 4 X❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 4 X❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 4 ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study 7 X❑ ❑ Historical Survey 4 ❑ ❑x School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 2 X❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 2 X❑ ❑ Completed Exhibits A -F (see below for additional information)' ❑ x❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ ❑ Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ ❑ Checklist continued onto next page... 2/21/2017 Page 11 of 16 Packet Pg. 250 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 9.A.7 Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined ❑ X❑ ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: 0 Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code 0 Exhibit D: Legal Description 0 Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each 0 Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan ❑■ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ I Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION El Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑ PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 ❑ Transportation Review Fees: * Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. O Minor Study Review: $750.00 O Major Study Review $1,500.00 El Legal Advertising Fees: O CCPC: $1,125.00 p BCC: $500.00 2/21/2017 Page 12 of 16 Packet Pg. 251 Ger County 9.A.7 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: O Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee Signature of Petitioner or Agent 2/21/2017 ?/J Z -;; � DA Page 13 of 16 Packet Pg. 252 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252- 6358 EXHIBIT A (To be completed in a separate document and attached to the application packet.) PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: CONDITIONAL USES (Optional) 1. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Table below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the (type of PUD) PUD Residential Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. 9.A.7 3/17/2017 Page 14 of 16 Packet Pg. 253 9.A.7 EXHIBIT B (To be completed in a separate document and attached to the application packet.) TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES SINGLE MINIMUM LOT AREA S.F. PER TWO-FAMILY, CLUBHOUSE/ SINGLE FAMILY S.F. PER UNIT MULTI- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS UNIT PATIO & RECREATION MINIMUM LOT WIDTH FAMILY ATTACHED & FAMILY FEET FEET ZERO LOT LINE FEET BUILDINGS MINIMUM FLOOR AREA TOWNHOUSE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA S.F. PER S.F. PER S.F. PER UNIT S.F. PER UNIT S.F. PER UNIT UNIT UNIT MINIMUM LOT WIDTH FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA S.F S.F S.F S.F./D.U. N/A MIN FRONT YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A MIN SIDE YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A MIN REAR YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A MIN PRESERVE SETBACK FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN FEET or BH, FEET FEET FEET N/A STRUCTURES whichever is greater MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET EXCEED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET SIDE FEET FEET FEET FEET BH REAR FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET PRESERVE SETBACK FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET DISTANCE BETWEEN PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO SPS SPS SPS or FEET FEET EXCEED S.P.S. = Same as Principal Structures BH = Building Height Footnotes as needed 3/17/2017 Page 15 of 16 Packet Pg. 254 9.A.7 GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Setback may be either feet ( ) on one side or feet ( ) on the other side in order to provide a minimum separation between principal structures of feet ( ). Alternatively, if the foot ( ) setback option is not utilized, then the minimum setback shall not be less than feet ( ) and the combined setback between principal structures shall be at least feet ( ). At the time of the application for subdivision plat approval for each tract, a lot layout depicting minimum yard setbacks and the building footprint shall be submitted. TABLE II DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT * Whichever is greater ** Per principal structure, on the finished first floor. 3/17/2017 Page 16 of 16 Packet Pg. 255 PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA Sq. Ft. N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH Ft. N/A MINIMUM YARDS (External) From Immokalee Road Canal ROW Ft. SPS From Future Extension of Collier Blvd. Ft. SPS From Western Project Boundary Ft. Ft. MINIMUM YARDS (Internal) Internal Drives/ROW Ft. Ft. Rear Ft. Ft. Side Ft. Ft. MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES Ft. or sum of Building heights Ft. MAXIMUM HEIGHT Retail Buildings Ft. Ft. Office Buildings Ft. Ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA Sq. Ft. ** N/A MAX. GROSS LEASABLE AREA Sq. Ft. N/A * Whichever is greater ** Per principal structure, on the finished first floor. 3/17/2017 Page 16 of 16 Packet Pg. 255 ATTACHMENT 1 REGAL ACRES RPUD List of Ownership and Corporation Parties for Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. 9.A.7 Percentage of Ownership Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. 100% of Folio #s 00737760008 00741080606 00738280008 00741100104 See attached SunBiz report for registered agent/officer details. Regal Acres RPUD - List of Ownership and Corporation Parties a ". 11 January 2018 Page 1 of 1 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 256 Detail by Entity Name Florida Department of State Jiv�s�rtY �f mr uffkiul Sade of Fluri6 oveLsire Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Detail By Document Number / Detail by Entity Name Florida Not For Profit Corporation HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. Filing Information Document Number 742136 FEI/EIN Number 59-1834379 Date Filed 03/20/1978 State FL Status ACTIVE Last Event AMENDMENT Event Date Filed 11/05/1999 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 11145 TAM IAM I TRAL EAST NAPLES, FL 34113 Changed: 03/09/2005 Mailinq Address 11145 TAM IAM I TRAL EAST NAPLES, FL 34113 Changed: 03/09/2005 Reaistered Aaent Name & Address Cunningham, John 841 Partridge Ct MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 Name Changed: 02/03/2017 Address Changed: 02/03/2017 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title S MUELLER, MICHAEL 1109 STRAWBERRY COURT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 Page 1 of 3 9.A.7 DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS Packet Pg. 257 http://search. sunbiz.org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 10/25/2017 Detail by Entity Name Page 2 of 3 9.A.7 Title VC SWIHART, STANARD MD 789 REGENCY RESERVE CIR APT 4603 NAPLES, FL 34119 Title Chairman of the Board CUNNINGHAM, JOHN W 841 PARTRIDGE CT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 Title CEO LEFKOW, LISA REV. 1490 NOTTINGHAM DR NAPLES, FL 34109 Title President KOULOHERAS, NICK 6130 CYPRESS HOLLOW WAY NAPLES, FL 34109 Title VC Hubbard, Edward 785 Cocobay Drive Naples, FL 34108 Title VC Jilk, Craig 4101 Gulf Shore Blvd N 105 Naples, FL 34103 Title VC Peterson, Doug 849 Swan Dr. Marco Island, FL 34145 Title Treasurer Deal, Rick 2495 Rue Du Jardin Unit 402 Naples, FL 34105 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date Packet Pg. 258 http://search. sunbiz.org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 10/25/2017 Detail by Entity Name 2016 02/01/2016 2017 02/03/2017 2017 08/29/2017 Document Images Page 3 of 3 9.A.7 08/29/2017 -- AMENDED ANNUAL REPORTI View image in PDF format 02/03/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT I View image in PDF format 02/01/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/12/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/25/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/22/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/25/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/25/2011 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/05/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/23/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/26/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/08/2007 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/25/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/09/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/20/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/02/2003 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/04/2002 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/06/2001 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/06/2000 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/05/1999 -- Amendment View image in PDF format 03/11/1999 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/04/1998 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/26/1997 -- Name Change View image in PDF format 01/31/1997 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/24/1996 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations to Itt Iq to N �L CL 7 Y V M m C E L V M ++ a Packet Pg. 259 http://search. sunbiz. org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/S earchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 10/25/2017 ATTACHMENT 2 REGAL ACRES RPUD Date Property Acquired and Warranty Deeds August 2018 9.A.7 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 260 ENGINEERING TO: James Sabo, AICP FROM: Laura DeJohn, AICP SINCE 1946 DATE: August 6, 2018 PL20170001733 - Regal Acres RPUD RE: Deed dated 6/28/18 The attached Warranty Deed dated June 28, 2018 documents the transaction of the parcel identified as Folio 400737720006. In the initial application for the referenced rezone (PL20170001733) this parcel was indicated as under contract for purchase by Habitat for Humanity, Inc. Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. is now the owner. Please include this deed as part of your file, replacing the previous owner information and prior deed for this parcel. We will also include this deed in the applicant's backup material for the CCPC. 2350 Stanford Court . Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 434-0333 . Fax (239) 434-9320 a� U a M M ti 0 0 0 0 N J a N G D a cfl m A 2 �L Ccc G V m cd G L V a Packet Pg. 261 This Document Prepared Without Ovinion of Title By. Carlo F. Zarnpogna, Esquire Zampogna Law Firm 1112 Goodlctte Rd., No., Ste. 204 Maples, Florida 34102 Telephone: (239) 261-0592 Parcel ID No.: 00737720006 Deed Consideration_ 5250.000.00 Documentary Stamps Due on Transfer: $1,750.00 11lt� !°►'� THIS INDENTURE, made this ; 'r' day of .lune, 2018, between G.H.L., L.L.C, an Ohio limited liability company, whose address is: 8654 Camelot Drive, Chesterland, Ohio 44026, and NEWELL CREEK, L.L.C., an Ohio limited liability company, whose address is 7975 Newell Creek Drive, Mentor, Ohio 44060, together with Nicholas DiCillo a/k/a Nichols K. DiCillo and Joan DiCillo, Husband and Wife, whose post office address is: 8654 Camelot Drive, Chesterland, Ohio 44026, as GRANTORS`, and HABITAT FOR HUMI ANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC., a Florida not for profit corporation, as GRANTEE*, whose post office address is: 11145 Tamiatni Trail East, Naples, Florida 34113. WITNESSETH, that the Grantors, for and in consideration of the sutra of TEN DOLLARS (S 10.00), and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantors in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and. sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of Collier, State of Florida, to -wit: The West !/2 of the East!/:! of the Northwest l of the Northeast !4 of Section 12, Township 51 South, Ravage 26 East, Collier County, Florida, excepting the North 30 feet thereof, which is reserved for road purposes. SUBJECT TO taxes for the year 2018 and subsequent years; zoning, building code, and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; and restrictions, reservations and easements common to the subdivision. TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. And the Grantors hereby covenant with said Grantee that the Grantors are lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantors have good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. And said Grantors do hereby further warrant that at the time of this conveyance, the subject property is vacant land and therefore it is not the Grantors' homestead nor is it the homestead of any family member within the meaning set forth In. the constitution of thr, Statc of Florida, nor is it contiguous to or part of homestead property. Grantors' residence and homestead address are as listed above. U Page 1 of 4 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 262 To have and to hold in fee simple forever. *Singular and plural are interchangeable as context requires. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: 9.A.7 G.H.U., L,L.C., an Ohio limited liability f� company, Sy� Signature of titi itiiies�'p I O iCillo l, b m: Onager Priat Name of Witness #.I Jai Signature s iT2 k J Ifti p' r r t Print Name of Witness #2 i STATE OF i— ""-i' i COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before ine this _,4,L day of June, 2018 by Joan DiCillo, as Manager of G.H.U., L.L_C., an Ohio limited liability company, wl o is (check appropriate box) ] personally known to me or who [ produced as identification. FL- d4r�ktL� 5 A Notary Public knA are T Printed Name: ,�-tom.; � . 1'tti ' �r. 7c Commission No. My Commission Expires: ARN. ARM STRO NG MYCOMMISSION #GG 04 8 7EXPIRES: October11r2038 Bonded ThNoryPbliUndevt rs Pagc 2 of 4 (SEAL) Packet Pg. 263 Signed, scaled and delivered in the presence of: Signature of Witness 41 22;�#� A &k1_2 Print Name of Witness �I Si ature`of Witness 9` Print Name of Witness #Z STATE OF ?hf o COUNTY OF 6642� NEWELL CREED, an Ohio limited liability company, By - Gloria DiCillo Its: Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this'- day of June, 2018 by GIoria DiCillo, as Manager of NEWELL CREEK; L.L.C.; an Ohio limited liability corn any, who is (c�xeek appropriate box) [__� personally known to the or who [ ✓] produced as identification. Notary Public Signatti e Printed Name. xl r7 C i "• � Commission No. My Commission Expires:✓ P i (SEAL) Prue 3 0f4 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 264 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written_ Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Signature Print Name of Witness n2 STATE OF''t:°�C�; COUNj"Y OF i ... ` Nicholas DiCillo, a/k/a Nichols K. DiCillo j9djx iCillo ,f The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , � � day of June, 2018 by Nicholas DiCillo a/k/a Nichols K. DiCillo, who is ( heck a proprz.ate box) [ _ personally known to me or who [ produced �� j -f' .�` i as identification and Joan DiCillo, who. is (check appropriate box) [�� personally known to me or who [ �� produced �_ j ,' L �Ii _ as identification. Notary Public Signature Printed Name_r,%�n; Commission No. My Corninission Expires: (SEAL) TARA N. ARMSTRONG MY COMMISSION #fGOSA317 P;= EXPIRES: October 11, 2979 %enFFgc` Bonded 7hruNoWryPuVcUnawflters Pagc 4 of a 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 265 Warranty Deeds Existing Regal Original Folio #s 00740760008, 00740480003, 00737400009 9.A.7 Q Packet Pg. 266 t QJ•SD necarding 4 �-i0 Documentary Stamps This doounant wad prepared by wad return for Constanas K. Burka, Isq. Lbore and tbkeler, P.L. 1107 last Inion Aveane, suite 112 Punta Garda, Florida 33930 PanelfDNsrbw 00740760008100740480003 Warranty Deed Thh Indenture, Meda this 1 3 "=_ day of April lugetae V. Fray, a married man, 3630709 OR: 391 II=19 14 011ICM AICalml of 06/02/2005 at 03:19?~ NIGIT I. leu., 1101 1 WOK AYI 1112 ?W1 GORA 1L 33950 5372 , 2005 AD., He"w"s of tk Cowty of COLLIM , stet= or rlorida , grantor, sad Habitat For unity of Collier County, Inc., a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida wmw .dd,e a is 11145 Tamiani Trail last, Naples, FL 34113 at stir Cnrey a Collier , Stee of Florida , grantee,. W}neneth &w dre GRATdM forted is ecm6deratioe of b sun of ------------------------Tw DCLLAM 1410) ----------------------- DOLLARS, =1 other sed ted rskAge win dmo m a GLWM m bud paid by GkAXTEE the receipt whereof s hereby wbwwi[*K hat [r=hed, bovamed and told ra dw said GRANITE otd GRANTM hats, wccanon dad n4pw fvmrrr, d,e fo[bwM dmmted Lao hdag and bring in du County of COLL= swse of Florida b .ger MM VISIT "A" ATTACH® HERETO AIii3 ] j ST THIS Kir-Tsm3cirs NADI A P .-Jn9=r.F�� The property herein conveyed DOES MT the RMU STZAD property of the Grantor. The..Arant:orIn RQ60LSTZAD ss is 4104 Oa1f Shore Sled. Po. PS2, r 34103-29 ,3. Subject to res any, and taxes record, if dad dw s=Jw dna ba*y fall!' wwrom the u* to %rid God, and wi31 defend the wane agwmet IswU clrcaa of atl Psora it homemot. In Wihwu Whereof, et tj ago. ho beteanto bet ha hi -d -d teal dw day rind yeer frrx aborc wda & SissiA seated and id ddiren d in our prpence: Printed Flame: V129Qne D. Fray witness P-0. Addnw 4191 GaffSiore EhL Tia RRI rl n ,7 E ..t - 1 TrAnE& Ft. se13-2063 Printed NAM= lr/omar,1 A4& to wit m"s STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF D nJJ3[R % 3 The lonVomj motim wet -m - �—' 'Fed halorc me dris r '� &y of April , 2005 by lugemle U . Frey ba n perwnaity known n me o: t.. � hiaFiarida tiut�s"4 �i Lisa B. Leflc�w No :azy Public "� �°�'""°s gyp'""' �r �G�' Garnrnissian # ❑D293446 ianzasz��yy Expires MarcD08p� •9crwdTrvrfMn-Inuarra.Inc 8043697919 roott..�� a.rd1. PG; COLLA! OHM, n Ste, UC ?ll 11.50 DOC -.71 .70 Packet Pg. 267 EXHIBIT "A" Parcel 1: *** 4R: 3812 PG: ll 9.A.7 Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, thence along the East line of said Section 12, North 00° 1120" East, 2743.15 feet to the East 114 corner of said Section 12; thence continue along said East line of Section 12, North 00° 27'50" East, 894.35 feet; thence North 89° 56'55" West, 443.00 feet for a Place of Beginning; thence North 89° 56'55" West, 475.53 feet; thence North 00° 34'06" East, 490.97 feet; thence South 89° 56'55" East, 474.64 feet; thence South 00' 27'50" West, 490.97 feet to the Place of Beginning; being in the Southeast 114 of the Northeast 114 of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. -AND- Parcel 2: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, thence along the-Eas"ine of said Section 12, North 00° 11'20" East, 2743.15 feet to the East 114 corner of sal[$ tan 12; thence continue along said East line of Section 12, on a bearingof North oQai"fast, 894.35 feet to a set tack; thence run North 89° 56'55" VL�e far 91$.53 feet to of iron pin with survey cap #LS 4273 which is the Point of Be t�rt; thence. --North 89° 56'55" West for 443.98 feet to the West line of the ou east 172�the Northeast 114, of said Section 12 which is marked by a set iron pi w SvrVe a #LS 4273; cc along said West line run North 00° 34'06" East o4`490.98. felt ate Northof the southeast 114 of the Northeast 114 of said S t1.24&Cc � � arked by aniron J*n with Survey Cap #LS 4273; thence along said line run South 89° 56' S" 001443.00 feet to a set iron pin with Survey Cap #LS 4� thence South 00° 26'S0� or 490.48 feet to the Point o of Beginning; being in the S4`fiei s 114 of the North of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collict", it3c,_Florida. -AND- - Parcel 3: TOGETHER WITH A Non-exclusive access easement for the benefit of Parcel 1 over and across the Southerly thirty (30) feet of following described property: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; thence along the East line of said Section 12, North 000 11'20" East, 2743.15 feet to the East 114 corner of said Section 12; thence continue along said East line of Section 12, North 00° 27'50" East, 894.35 feet for a Place of Beginning; thence North 890 56'55" West, 443.00 feet; thence North 00° 34'06" East, 490.97 feet; thence South 89° 56'55" East, 443.00 feet to the East line of said Section 12; thence along said East lime of Section 12 South 001 27'50" West, 490.97 feet to the Place of Beginning; Being in the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Packet Pg. 268 ' Moore and Waksler, P.L. 1147 W. Marion Ave., Suite 112 Punta Gorda, FL 33950 (941) 637-1955 FOLIO NUMBER: 00737440009 (Space above this line for tecor, *** 3303557 OR: 3452 PG; 3 9.A.7 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COD PL 12J0112H3 at 03:52FX DWIGHT E. 81OCI, CLERK CONS 10.00 RIC FEE 6.00 DOC -.74 .70 COPIES 1.00 RISC 1.00 t a Retn: �4G -S7 ri1p� 70' WARRANTY DE TAT FOR EUKHI?y 0 TAXIAXI TR E THIS WARRANTY DEED, is made the 15�t_ day of DecenibCTWM 9'D A111g Brainard, whose address is 124 13° Ave S, Naples, Florida 34142-7249 ("Grantor") to Habitat For Humanity of Collier County, Inc., a Florida Corporation, whosa address is 11554 Tamiami Trail Fast, Naples, Florida 34113("Grantee"): (Wherever used herein, the tennis "Grantors" and "Gran(ees" include all parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations) WTTNF.SSEiH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sura of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to Grantorin handpaidby Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee, all that rariain land situate, lying and being in the County of Collier, State of Florida, to wit The South 14 of the Northeast 114 of the N of the Northeast 114, less the East 3 County, Florida. .! C9 Subject to restrictions, This vacant property is not —Naples,-norida 34102-72t 4 and the South 1/2 of the South %: of the Northeast 114 ection ,_ ownship 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier of record, if an taxes subsequent to 2003. Nhe Grantor. The Grantor's homested address is: 12413" Ave S., TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. V 1 1 s�/ AND the Grantor hereby the title to said ]and, aid will defend the same against lawful clainis of all persons whomsoever. L IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set .' the day and year first above written Signed, Sealed and Delivered as to Each Grantor in the Presentee of STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER USAE.LEFKOW Cemm� r �C�91� y,; Y MY CCiAlMiS510N I CC 891858 pik-�j 311,'10q EXPIRES: Maw 4,2V 540" scow ThwNovo PWkw6wWAM The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of December, 2003, by Dan King Brainard, who is sonallyXnown to rm or who has produced as identification. ' `)"' Packet Pg. 269 9.A.7 Warranty Deeds Folio #s 00737760008, 00741080606, 00738280008, 00741100104 Q Packet Pg. 270 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00737760008 Site Adr. Name/Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E City NAPLES State I FL Zip 34113-7753 Page 1 of 1 9.A.7 ap No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 6B12 000100 012 6812 12 51 26 5.27 ;v a Legal 12 5126 W1/2 OF E1/2 OF E1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS N 30 FT Millage Area • 25 Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER Use Code O 70 - VACANT INSTITUTIONAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) Date Book -Page Amount 01/04/06 3959-3581 $ 550,000 01/25/05 3921-645 $ 268,000 11/16/00 2744-746 $ 0 05/01/68 273-547 $ 0 r� a Packet Pg. 271 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=757462977&ccpaver=1707221124&Fol... 8/5/2017 d Millaae Rates O *Calculations c` ti School Other Total o 0 0 5.245 6.258 11.503 0 N 2016 Certified Tax Roll a (Subject to Change) G Land Value $ 79,0 a (+) Improved Value 9 to (_) Market Value $ 79,0 (-) 10% Cap $ 9,4 A (_) Assessed Value $ 69,5 L cc (_) School Taxable Value 1 Q. (_) Taxable Value I If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final — Tax Roll co M C d E t V r� r� a Packet Pg. 271 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=757462977&ccpaver=1707221124&Fol... 8/5/2017 l Return to: Cons t an cc M- B u rke 3161708 OR. 3959 rV, 35$1 J Name Moore and Waksler, P.L RECORDED to OFFICIAL RECORDS Address: t107 W. Marion Avenue of COLLISR COUNTY. FL a 0110412096 at 12:12PK DWIGNY Punta Gorda, Florida 33950 S. BROCK, CLERK CONS 590000.09 h This Instrument Prepared by; RIC F11 14,00DOC-.1D Constance M. Burke 3850,00 Moore and Waksler, PLL, Retrr 1107 W. Marion Avenue NOORE & WAKSL1R Punta Gorda, Florida 33950 1107 if KARION AVE C12 as a necessary incident to the fulfillment of conditions PII]PTA GORDA FL 33950 a l contained in a title insurance commitment issued by it, t Property Appraisers Parcel I -D- (Folio) Numberts): MULTIPLE Q � m File No. 1302-5-1164 M M WARRANTY DEED (CORPORATION) This Warranty Deed Made the day of December, 2005, by NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF MARCO ISLAND, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, who acquired title as New Life Community Church of Marco Inc., and having its place of business at 1361 Andalusia Terrace, Marco Island, Florida 34145, hereinafter called the grantor, to HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC., a Florida not -far -profit corporation, whose post office address is: 11145 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34113, hereinafter called the grantee, WTI•NESSETH: That said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 Do] Iars and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these presents grants. bargains, seiIs. aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the iR1 t c Band situate in Collier County, Florida, vin The West A of the East 'h of the East '/, of the Northeast'/. of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, excepting the North 30 feet thereof, which is reserved for road purposes, and The Fast'/2 of the East Y of the East 1/z of the Northwest V. of the Northeast'/, of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, excepting the North 30 feet thereof, which is rt;serv'ed for roadof,the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. � + -.v�, r •� •t ' �� TOGETHER with all the tenements etLi�nl+ts and lappuitenan 0 belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same "t4ffi le forever. And the for he mrensntid tee that the canto &� Y grantee grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully uartanLs the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of ail persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent in 2005, reservations, restrictions and easements of record, if any- Mlherewr used herein the terms "grantor, and 'grantee included all the panes to thi.e Inst ument, and the heirs. legal representale vss and assigns ofmdrvidual,r, and the successors and assigns cfcorporanoq• f In Witness Whereof, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name, and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized, the day and year first shove written. Signed, sealedand livered in our presence; ATTEST: antis Murphy a retan Witness Signature: Printed Name: IARs�vs Witness Signature: Printed Name: LL�q STATE OF FLORIDA ` COUNTY OF COLLIER NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF MARCO ISLAND, INC„ a Florida not-for-profit corporation, who acquired title as New Life Community Church of Marco Inc. 0 BY: / Reverend Thomas C. NrcCulley, President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisWl day of December, 2005, by Reverend Thomas C. McCulley as President and Francis Murphy, as Secretary of NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF MARCO ISLAND, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation. They are personalty known to me or who have produced driver licenses as identification. My Commission Expires: 6, f 3 7CA,1 N(3TARlf PUBIX-5 IF OF FLORIDA Michael K HatTis Printed Nam APL 13, 200 Notary Publifon etl 7M Atlantic 8o Co., to Serial Number � e. Packe Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 100738280008 Site Adr. Name/Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CC INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST City NAPLES State FL Zip 34113 Map No. I Strap No. Section I Township Range I Acres *Estimated 6B12 000100 022 6812 I 12 51 I 26 1.35 m U Q Legal 12 5126 N1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 1.35 AC OR 875 PG 445 a� Millage Area 8 25 Millaae Rates O *Calculations ti Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total c Use Code A 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) Date Book -Page Amount 07/20/17 5418-840 $ 15,000 07/20/17 5418-838 $ 0 06/29/09 4467-1397 $ 0 07/01/80 875-445 $ 0 11/01/73 564-645 $ 0 r� a Packet Pg. 273 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=46794096&ccpaver=1710181149&F... 10/25/2017 0 N 2017 Certified Tax Roll a (Subject to Change) G Land Value $ 8,7 a (+) Improved Value 9 (_) Market Value $ 8,7 v (_) Assessed Value $ 8,7w ca •L (_) School Taxable Value $ 8,7 (_) Taxable Value $ 8,7 a If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Y V m r� a Packet Pg. 273 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=46794096&ccpaver=1710181149&F... 10/25/2017 INSTR 5432588 OR 5418 PG 840 RECORDED 7/24/2017 9:09 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $105.00 REC $18.50 CONS 515,000.00 Premed by and return to: W. Jeffrey Cecil Attorney at Law Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, LLP 9132 Strada Place Third Floor Naples, FL 34108-2683 239-593-2900 File Number: WJC-HH-MEYER Parcel Identification No. 00738280008 CONSIDERATION: $15,000.00 This Indenture made this 20th day of address is 4216 Kensington High St, Na Habitat for Humanity of Collier Cot Z' Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34114/Of Above This Linc For Recording Warranty Deed ATUTORYFi)vt- 689.02, F.S.) /1�Jx oto\ 34105-5667 of the Winrida not for pr+ Stdi`q of 9.A.7 and Dietmar Meyer whose post office Collier, State of Florida, grantor*, and tion whose post office address is 11145 zrantee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for in o i f "V D 40/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to s id t r in i gr t , r ipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to th ( eirs AM orever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier Cou orida, to -wit: The North 112 of the Southwe" 4 f the Northwest 1/4' h) �ast 114 of the Northeast 114 of Section 12, Township 51 South, 6 East, Collier County a. Subject to the following: a) ad valo lift}pci.. ;�n real property taxes for the year of closing and subsequent years; b) zoning, li d11tg. todf and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any, provided that none of the foregoing shall prevent use of the property for residential purposes. and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * -Grantor" and "Grantec" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. (REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANKI DoubleTlmei Packet Pg. 274 *** OR 5418 PG 841 *** In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness Name: .Sqc 066�i'irr Witnes e: - — -� , Witness Name: Witnes�e: State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknc Meyer, who [I are personally known [Notary Sealy Warranty Deed (Smrurory Form) - Page 2 (Seal) Dietmar Meyer (j 01 "t kt�(Seal) Ute Alber Meyer 9.A.7 17 by Dietmar Meyer and Ute Alber Lftoras identification. n Expire5: TSE CIR DoubleTim" Packet Pg. 275 AGNES GUIS ..�•�.,��,; r : Notary Public - State ox.Fl� My Comm. Expires Met 2� Commission 0 FF 09021 _'�; i„•” Bonded Two* Nstiwial Navy Warranty Deed (Smrurory Form) - Page 2 (Seal) Dietmar Meyer (j 01 "t kt�(Seal) Ute Alber Meyer 9.A.7 17 by Dietmar Meyer and Ute Alber Lftoras identification. n Expire5: TSE CIR DoubleTim" Packet Pg. 275 Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00741100104 Site Adr. Name/Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRAIL E City NAPLES Map No. Strap No. 6B12 000100 1006B12 State I FL Zip 34113 Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 12 51 26 1.4 U Q Legal 12 5126 E 1018.64FT OF N 30FT OF NW 1/4 OF NE1/4 Millage Area 8 25 Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER Use Code A 10 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) Date Book -Page Amount 10/18/17 5441-1853 $ 500 10/18/17 5441-1850 $ 0 04/19/68 270-867 $ 0 r� a Packet Pg. 276 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=46794096&ccpaver=1710181149&F... 10/25/2017 a� Millaae Rates la *Calculations ti School Other Total o 0 0 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 0 N 2017 Certified Tax Roll a (Subject to Change) N Land Value $ 1 a- (+) Improved Value (_) Market Value $ 1 v t° (_) Assessed Valuew $ 1 ca •L (_) School Taxable Value $ 1 (_) Taxable Value $ 1 a If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Y V m C d t V r� r� a Packet Pg. 276 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=46794096&ccpaver=1710181149&F... 10/25/2017 INSTR 5460540 OR 5441 PG 1850 RECORDED 10/19/2017 9:18 AM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC 527.00 INDX $1.00 This instrument was prepared without opinion of title by and after recording return to: Daniel K. Weidenbruch, Esq. FisherBroyles, LLP 2394 Tamiami Trail North Suite 100 Naples, FL 34103 239-227-2880 (Space above this tine for m"wdm don) AFFIDAVIT OF SOLE REMAINING_DIRECTOR/TRUSTEE BEFORE ME, the undersigned officer authorized to administer oaths, an this day personally appeared VIRGINIA L. MARLOWE-BURNS (formerly known as Virginia L. Marlowe) (the "Affiant'j, individually al remaining trustee/director of FARMERS' INVESTMENT CORP., a dissoly r> jr a Farmers' Investment Corporation) (the "Corporation"), who uponw�t+rly sworn, d says: 1. TheraWi;T!9tof fL$ yeariur2�erstands the obligations of an oath, and has personal knoo os�tatted hei�in 1 2. The t tog r ar ow ("R. Marlowe"), were the sole directors and officers 1 ti was fively dissolved in 1985. 3. R. M is deceased and, ul AfT'rant is the sole remaining trustee/director of the Corpo L 4. The an \ teeldirector of the Corporation, is duly qualified to act as trustee on be n and, in said capacity, is authorized to execute and deliver a deed (or deeds) o conveyance to any real property owned by the Corporation including, without limitation: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. VIRGMIA L. MA.RLOWE-BURNS (formerly known as Virginia L. Marlowe) individually and as the sole remaining trustee/director of FARMERS' INVESTMENT CORP., a dissolved Florida corporation Page 1 of 2 9.A.7 Y Q Packet Pg. 277 OR 5441 PG 1851 STATE OF FLORIDA } ss: COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was sworn to, subscribed and acknowledged before me thisL& day of0246 `, 2017, by VIRGINIA L. MARLOWE-BURNS (formerly known as Virginia L. Marlowe) individually and as the sole remaining trustee/director of FARMERS' INVESTMENT CORP., a dissolved Florida corporation, who U is personally known to me, or W has produced 11 L as identification. Page 2 of 2 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 278 *** OR 5441 PG 1852 *** EXHIBIT "A" The North 30 feet of the N*o'thtscsf L4 ('%W 1.4) of the Northeast 14 (A"E 1/4) of Section 12, TowuQ4) 51 South, Range 26 East. Collier Count', Florida, less and erceptiou that portion INIng in the West 11 of the West 1'2 of the Northwest 14 of the Northeast 14, Also being described as follows: The East 1,018.64 feet of the North 30 feet of the North" est 1 4 of the -Northeast 1 4 of Section 12. Township St South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Florida. 4829-4450-4657, v.1 Y Exhibit A 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 279 INSTR 5460541 OR 5441 PG 1853 RECORDED 10/19/2017 9:18 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $3.50 REC 516.50 CONS $500.00 Daniel K. Weidenbruch Attorney at Law F'isherBroyles LLP 2390 Tamiami Trail North Suite 109 Naples, FL 34103 239-227-2880 Consideration: $500.00 Doe. Stamps: $3.50 This Warranty Deed made this A L. Marlowe), ac the sole surviving i Farmers' investment Co orate a office address is qLb Collier County, Inc., a Florida not fo� FL 34113, grantee: (whenever used herein the terms "grantor" i individuals, and the successors and assigns of 99 Above This Line For Recording Data] _ Warranty Deed 9.A.7 lJ� n Virginia L. Marlowe -Burns (a/k/a Virginia Board-,r�c�grs and as the sole remaining Trustee of orporat'W", ' Investment Coup.) whose post tor, and Habitat for humanity of -whosepov off,1 145 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, heirs, Ieg* representatives, and a3signs of Witnesseth, that said grantor, For conaidcrtttion of the s of T6V /100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to r in hand paid by sa' ipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the tee, and grantees hid Forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier Coenty, to -wit: f ` The North 30 feet of the Northwest 1W l ortheast 114 (NE 1/4) of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 Fast, Collier Conoty, orlda, less and except that portion lying in the West 112 of the West 112 of the Northwest 114 of the Northeast 1/4. Also being described as follows: The East 1,018.64 feet of the North 30 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 114 of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 00741100104 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the some in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2016. Doub,eTlme• Packet Pg. 280 *** OR 5441 PG 1854 *** In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto act grantar's hand and seat the day and year fust above written Signed, sealod and delivered in our presence: Witne a e: I . YW jXot1,tA,�LA/ VirginlM Marlowe -Burns (a/k/a Virginia L. Marlowe), as the sole surviving member of the last Board of Directors and an the sole retu fining Trustee of Farmers' Investment Corporsdon, a dissolved Florida corporation, (aW& Farmers' Investment Corp.) K Co State of Florida 10 County of Z� b, }!,%. L.J The foregoing instrument was ackno4Atnp the da f October, 2017 by Virginia L. Marlowe - Burns (wWa Virginia L. Marley* a e n lejast Board of Directors and as the sole remaining Trustee of Farmers' Inives r ti i,�arporation, (a/k/a Farmers' investment Corp.) owe-Bttrns, who L� is oer I all ] a -v s Ii as identification. [Not" seal] W LAURA KIRSCH= Notary Public • State of Florida Expires:Commission M FF 938636GG rC�CIV,,f��'� My Comm. Expires Nov 23, 2019 Wa, roma Peed - Page 2 poubl*Tl - 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 281 9.A.7 REGAL ACRES II RPUD EXHIBIT D Legal Description for Existing Regal Acres PUD nFCC'R I PTmi (PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3472, PAGE 2450) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 AND THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, LESS THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF, SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (AND ALSO INCLUDING PROPERTIES DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3812, PAGE 1158) COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 12, NORTH 00°11'20" EAST, 2743.15 FEET TO THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 12, NORTH 00°27'50" EAST, 894.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°56'55" WEST, 443.00 FEET FOR A PLACE OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89°56'55" WEST, 475.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°34'06" EAST, 490.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°56'55" EAST, 474.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°27'50" WEST, 490.97 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING; BEING IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 12, NORTH 00°11'20" EAST, 2743.15 FEET TO THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 12, NORTH 00°27'50" EAST, 894.35 FEET TO A SET TACK; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°56'55" WEST FOR 918.53 FEET TO A SET IRON PIN WITH SURVEY CAP #LS 4273 WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°56'55" WEST FOR 443.98 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 12 WHICH IS MARKED BY A SET IRON PIN WITH SURVEY CAP #LS 4273; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE RUN NORTH 00°34'06" EAST FOR 490.98 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 12 WHICH IS MARKED BY AN IRON PIN WITH SURVEY CAP #LS 4273; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE RUN SOUTH 89°56'55" EAST, 443.00 FEET TO A SET IRON PIN WITH SURVEY CAP #LS 4273; THENCE SOUTH 00°26'50" WEST FOR 490.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; BEING IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Regal Acres II RPUD - Legal Description August 2017 Page Iof3 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 282 9.A.7 REGAL ACRES II RPUD EXHIBIT D Plat Description for Existing Regal Acres PUD A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND RUN SOUTH 00°26'23" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 12, A DISTANCE OF 519.53 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE SOUTH 89°58'16" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE SOUTH 00°26'23" WEST PARALLEL WITH AND AT A PERPENDICULAR DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET FROM SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 12, A DISTANCE OF 865.84 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE NORTH 89°57'36" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 413.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 IN THE WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3812, PAGE 1158 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 00°26'23" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 490.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE NORTH 89°57'36" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN SAID DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3812, PAGE 1158, A DISTANCE OF 918.85 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 AT AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE NORTH 00°33'00" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND THE WEST LINES OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 AND THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 12, A DISTANCE OF 1355.24 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE NORTH 89°58'16" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 1329.25 FEET TO THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1,601,428 SQUARE FEET OR 36.76 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. Regal Acres II RPUD - Legal Description August 2017 Page 2of3 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 283 9.A.7 REGAL ACRES II RPUD EXHIBIT D Legal Description for Additional 23.15 Acres DESCRIPTION PARCEL No. 00737760008 & 00741080606 (ORB 3959, PG 3581) THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL No. 00738280008 (ORB 4467, PG 1397) NORTH 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TRACT 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 E. PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY TAX DEED OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 875, PAGE 445, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL No. 00737720006 (ORB 5083, PG 657) THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONTAINING TEN (10) ACRES, MORE OR LESS, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL No. 00741100104 (ORB 5441, PG 1850) (PER TITLE COMMITMENT) THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 (NE 1/4) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTION THAT PORTION LYING IN THE WEST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4. ALSO BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE EAST 1,018.64 FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Regal Acres II RPUD - Legal Description August 2017 Page 3of3 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 284 PRE -APPLICATION NOTES Q Packet Pg. 285 Coii'ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www. coil iergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PU DZ Date and Time: Tue 6/6/2017 3:004Mpm Assigned Planner: Nancy Gundlach Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Regal Acres PL #: PL20170001733 Property ID #: 73772000617377600081741080606 Current Zoning: RPUD & A Project Address: 10291110407 MAJESTIC CIR City: Naples Applicant: Johnson Engineering, Inc. Agent Name: Zarcartie 1 Agent/Firm Address: 2350 Stanford Court State: FL Zip: 34114 one: (239) 280-4323 City: Naples State: FL Zip: 04112 Property Owner: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY Address 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E. Pnonw(239) 775-0036 GHU LLC Please provide the following, if applicable: �p C i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: 6S — 3L V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 286 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net Coer County Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 a7f Z•±��1 Vitl,l"Aci _ t� `L�Writ • 1I L rY . L �� ValA '0�t 1 r( i�� M "+I ■ice 3 ♦t ��. *� Vi at _ 11 • �, i a _ III Oil I'll Il t■ S_ i �' • t 4 OAS 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 287 CAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collierizov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Nates a ure e It Affk 0 t S CL4kk I ryjA Cjt-f tA,'L, IK-� j, A,:;A LA �N+ mAti V t 40 ,CLI P— 5 k- disc -ice r� 9.A.7 y i V a d Cl) M r O O O r O N J a N D a to v v co tp c0 d r� c0 m M 7 u cc m C d E t V r.+ r.+ a Packet Pg. 288 Gd er County 9.A.7 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes Disclaimer. Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 4/26/2017 Page 1 3 of S Packet Pg. 289 &51 &WW �k CIO ICY COilnty Growth Management Department P L 2.0 100 0 11 -33 Submittal Checklist for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone Final submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. I of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ��r ' ^ 4 (I A/1'4 K �41 PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code nt' , U a a� a� 9�4 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at M time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets o 0 attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. o 0 REQUIREMENTS F COME REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary n Completed Application with required attachments ❑ Pre -application meeting notes Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 ❑ Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 2 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 2 ❑ Warranty Deed(s) 3 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 2 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 4 Y ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 4 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 5 ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 4 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 4 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 4 ❑ Traffic Impact Study 7 ❑ ❑ Historical Survey 4 ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 2 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 2 ❑ Checklist continued onto next page... 2/21/2017 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 290 _i76� I 9.A.7 I Completed Exhibits A -F (see below for additional information)' ❑ Utilities Engineering: I(t"nLeafen List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this �/ ❑ I Immokalee Water/Sewer District: document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ El Other: ❑ Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 Yz" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending ❑ the PUD Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined ❑ ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement "The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit C: Master Pian- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E. List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-590-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: Schooi District (Residential Components): Amy ❑Jockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Utilities Engineering: I(t"nLeafen ❑ Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ I Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Directo El Other: I I ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION J, -"Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 1-7 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre �S D to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre,- UD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre omprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre - application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 T Transportation Review Fees: Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 c Major Study Review $1,500.00 ;..-<egal Advertising Fees: VCC: $1,225.00 BCC: $500.00 t,,`S'chool Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 2/21/2017 Page 2 of Packet Pg. 291 9.A.7 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County *Additional fee for the 51 and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 10% of the original fee. All checks may be made payable to: Board of County Commissioners 2/21/2017 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 292 9.A.7 Environmental PUDZ-PUDA Checklist (non-RFMU) 1. Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay 3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve' on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on-site or mitigated off-site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-1); 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.l .d -e). Preserve Calculation L a 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve d Width a_ 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, M M c be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off-site c preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection I- 7. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory 0 N a structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be No permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. a stem wall or bean around wetland preserve). Provide cross-sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback le co 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) v, Listed Species •L 4) 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off-site M 2 preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm c fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. 0 (LDC 3.08.00) See Environmental Data Checklist below m 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) m E Master Plan Contents 11. FUD shall include Preserve Tract section. When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: a A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC) OR A. Allowable Uses: 1. Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation areas, as per LDC requirements. 3. Water management as allowed by the LDC PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 293 9.A.7 Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05 E. 1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 12. PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. Include Bear in this dote. Environmental Data Checklist Project Name Regal Acres PUD Rezone 0 a The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 as d I . Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. ti 2. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of c Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. J Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with a at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include ^t 0 revision dates on resubmittals. a 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP sc or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District w (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction R �L plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify 2 on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least E 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality 3 wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order U approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be m reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. CD E 4. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. Q Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 294 9.A.7 6. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 7. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on-site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 8. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 9. Soil and/or ground water sampling not required as previous agricultural use did not include any chemicals. The applicant advised they only thought it was used for grazing, which was confirmed by the 1985 aeiral. 10. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP COME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 11. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 12. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: M a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. T b. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. c. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed 3 as mitigation for impacts to listed species. U ca m 13. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. a 14. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? To be determined at Review 1. Applicant advised no deviations being requested. 15. PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 295 CoAY Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierizov.net Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In PL# PL20170001733 Collier County Contact Information: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ avid Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net SummerAraque Environmental Review 252-6290 sum merbrownaraque@colliergov.net Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 StephenBaluch@colliergov.net J Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 lauriebeard@colliergov.net Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@colliergov.net George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio@colliergov.net ❑I Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net John DeBlasiis Zoning Services /Ops. Coordinator 252-1050 johndebIasis@colliergov.net ❑ Dale Fey North Collier Fire Safety dalefey@colliergov.net Kay Deselem Zoning Services 252-2586 kaydeseiem@colliergov.net Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2434 ericfey@colliergov.net Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@colliergov.net ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons@colliergov.net Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net Ll Shar Hingson East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.org ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes@colliergov.net ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net ❑ Eric Johnson, AICP, CFM Zoning Services 252-2931 ericjohnson@colliergov.net ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net ❑ Patty Kulak Zoning Services / Planning Tech 252-1035 patriciakulak@colliergov.net ❑ Stephen Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net ❑ Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 paulomartins@colliergov.net Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@coiliergov.net J Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net ❑ Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Impact Fees 252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net El Michele Mosca, AICP Impact Fee Administration 252-2466 michelemosca@colliergov.net Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net Updated 4/26/2017 Page j 4 of 5 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 296 COQ V Count COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierizov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 9.A.7 ❑ Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-231.5 mariamocheltree@colliergov.net ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@colliergov.net ❑ Bill Pancake North Collier Fire Safety 252-2310 billpancake@colliergov.net ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net ❑ Fred Reischl, AICD Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Stormwater Plan Review 252-290 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Plan Review 252-5092 richardorth@colliergov.net Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 petershawinsky@coiliergov.net ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Services/ Operations Analyst 252-1042 camdensmith@colliergov.net ❑ Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-5740 Scottstone@colliergov.net Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net C' Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 marktempleton@colliergov.net ❑ Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen@colliergov.net ❑ Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net ❑ David Weeks, AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net ❑ Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5748 1 christinewilloughby@colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email J lt I it � ic- eras CIL Ir -4 7 76 M6 ,t, erm, e L -L -6I C-�ar M�11zr .� C � ��-� mJ11erC� akn e Ccm 2 h�R-G �r �i /� Z`5ZZ C%0 r.K�;�rl� (N•4. /r. N -.0crono 5P v`� M' ,,AA d IIL,V' W Updated 4/26/2017 Page I S of 5 rJ r,'C Packet Pg. 297 V, Ce. Y 00147 lty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Add ressmg@colliergov.nei or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SID PA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) Fm] PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description maybe attached) See attached S12 T51 R26 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00741080606,00737760008,007377 0008, 00738280008, 00741 1 001 04 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES � �P�I cable�ifa6lready assigned) • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (ifapplicable) Regal Acres II PROPOSED STREET NAMES (ifapplicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - orAR or PL # 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 298 9.A.7 COI T County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Laura DeJohn Phone: (239) 280-4331 Email/Fax: LKS@johnsoneng.com; zls@johnsoneng.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00741100104 Folio Number 00741080606 Folio Number 00737760008 Folio Number 00738280008 Folio Number 00737720006 Folio Number Approved by: Date: 6/20/2017 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Packet Pg. 299 Legal Descriptions Parcel 00741080606 12 5126 E1/2 OF E1/2 OF E1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS N 30FT Parcel 007 37760008 12 5126 W112 OF E1/2 OF E1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS N 30 FT Parcel00737760M 00737720006 12 5126 W112 OF E1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS N 30FT Parcel 00738280008 12 5126 N1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 1.35 AC OR 875 PG 445 Parcel 00741100104 12 5126 E 1018.64FT OF N 30FT OF NW 1/4 OF NE1/4 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 300 Epp � CN o Ci c REFLECTION! LAKES v E S y � b - 0 Q 23.84 ACRES M WEST WIND I p i ESTATES O � � O • µ 4 PROPOSED ADDITION TO ^+*PUD BOUNDARY EXISTING PUD F BOUNDARY 36.75 ACRES '� • .fw t .., mp r oc 3 Fs 9.A.7 I s m L a 87.5 175 350 Q (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1--350') R i� M M r 0 O CD 0 N J a N a ra m rn Ta m a a u m Co c m 1 � V r Q EXISTING AND 014 � JOHNSON ENGINEERING. INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT REGAL ACRES j 0 H N 4112 PROPOSED PHO ES (239) ID4343 a333 PUD BOUNDARY ENGINEERING FAX: 334-3661 oPRO ECT N0. FlLf H0. SCALE SHEETE.B. {1542 42 Ac L.B. 0642fi42 JUNE 2017 AS SHOWN 1 OF 1 � Packet Pg. 301 I 9.A.7 I cYnTF OF FLORIDA Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East Latitude:26°02' 55.9" N. Longitude: 81,39' 34.5" W PROJECT 4 LOCATION MANCHESTER DR t(INCDOM CT MANATEE RD — T Cr --- U , �OY pyECIR �� "`pR CECIL RD VICINITY AERIAL STREET MAP N.T.s. N.T.S. JOHNSON ENGINEERING. INC. Location Map 2122 JOHNSON STREET P o Box 1550 Regal Acres Ph2 Collier County, Florida FORT MYERS. FLORIDA 33902.1550 DATE1PROJECTFILE NO SCALE SHEET PHONE (2391934"6046 ENGINEERINGE 5 #U2 & LBFAX (239) 3661 9642 April 2(117 20(70078-000 25, 26 N111 IO ScakB EST NOTES: The aeriat photos shown were taken in 2016. AL.J WALL Packet Pg. 302 0 100 200 eet r - 9.A.7 C v E i $ 1.1 Soils Legend Symbol Soil Alame Hvdric Status li N 2 Holopaw fine sand, limestone substratum Yes 3 Malabar fine sand Yes 20 Et drum and malabar, high, fine sands No E 27 Holopaw fine sand Yes 32 Urban land No tido m S NOTES: h The aerial photos shown irorn Collier County Digital Library and dated: January 2016. ry JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC v 2122 JOHNSON STREET c P O BOX t 550 m FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 339021550 �JOHNS PHONE (2391 3944N066 ENGINEERING FAX (239)66 t 30642 :w rt �v Wr = r dL- y �• lidi.f C v E i $ 1.1 Soils Legend Symbol Soil Alame Hvdric Status li N 2 Holopaw fine sand, limestone substratum Yes 3 Malabar fine sand Yes 20 Et drum and malabar, high, fine sands No E 27 Holopaw fine sand Yes 32 Urban land No w -.%NAPPSOf.Drawings%201n20170078NEnvironmeniaKArcGCITabWAsrl5oiis m S NOTES: h The aerial photos shown irorn Collier County Digital Library and dated: January 2016. ry JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC v 2122 JOHNSON STREET c P O BOX t 550 m FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 339021550 �JOHNS PHONE (2391 3944N066 ENGINEERING FAX (239)66 t 30642 3 CL � Y �� ' � r � ri• to yr �L w� d Q) E U � U W _ 4 - Q Legend QProject Boundary Mydnc Soiis Aerial & Soils Map Regal Acres Ph 2 Collier County, Florida TE PROJECT FILE NO. SCALESHEET APril 2017 20170078-000 1251 26 As Shown Fawe 2 I Packet Pg. 303 2 E 434F2 tyrdweod CeMter IAlaed Fxotics 25.44s< [er ARsed. E>eotits SD•7 N 3!. CL 43113 lurdwood - Lud Sv `i 514 S�rAle w �. t(�y SM2 Wet Prairie. ExoUn �' 491E w � la- 6,30 Wel Prade.ExcuO`11-74% U Teyl Zs Z' 9 4- NOTES i. Thewenar6sanas acewaiersure5anownrAtmnii P -Act en3ef end.. wh't -. _. TW REEF LN N 6m mm� a „a hw� aye <, �r _OCEAN 2 Nnmerciatum Ari deiin6lll0M as per the FIA16tla Land g Fusn1 GassMCA+ SV slam IFL"CS)WDOT t9**1 3. �gdewenonA N � rbn wetarq EW . wwlab sw . SON" wale, Whs sdowr� ware Padded sr Clow Canty DOW 4. Th --nal P`-' uta.a ala dead Jen'+Ary tots. m $ NOTES: 9 from Collier Caun Digital Library and dated: January 2616. h The aerial photos shown o JOHNSON ENGINEERING INC ry 2122 JOHNSON STREET p IMM,�+ P 0 BO% 1550 FORT MYERS,-ORIDA 33902-1550 PHONE (2395 334.0046 p a ENGIN E E R I N G FAN F B. *(642 239) 6 La. *6412 Z 0 100 200 K eet ■R I in T d L V Q Legend a1 d Project Boundary M FLUMS � O O O ¢ N „a 0. S N O a FLUCFCS Map Regal Acres Ph 2 Collier County, Florida PE PROJECT FlLE NO. SCALE SHEET As Shown Fipurel July 2017 20170079.000 12-5L26 Packet Pg. 304 WrJ f � f /Z y .P f \ ` rip ` �` �� ` � � � • sal y E V S NOTES: i The aerial photos shown Irom Collier County Digital Library and dated: November 2016. ti Collier County Future Land Use downloaded from Collier County and is dated: February 2017. ry JOHNSON ENGINEE RING. INC 2122 JOHNSON STREET —; P 0 BOX 1550 2 FORT MYERS. FLORIDA 339021550 PHONE (2391334.0046 ENGINEERING FAX 6 & 33OIL ATE 3 a Y64242 a L.B " t642 9.A.7 11111 0 1.000 2,000 eet Legend OProject Boundary AG - Agricultural ! Rural Desigr18110n C - Conservation oeslgnalion ['1 RFN - RF-Neulral RFR - RF -Receiving RFS - RF -Sending RI - Rural Industrial District UC - urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict uR - Urban Residential Subdistrict e' .1 URF - Urban Residential Fringe Suedistnct Collier County Future Land Use Map Regal Acres Ph 2 Collier County, Florida E PROJECT FILE NO. SCALE SHEET May 2017 20170GIS 000 12-51-26 As Show r. Figure 5 Packet Pg. 305 NARRATIVE OF REQUEST r a Packet Pg. 306 9.A.7 REGAL ACRES PHASE II RPUD EVALUATION CRITERIA NARRATIVE PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.13) 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The Regal Acres II RPUD project site consists of 59.9 acres located on the west side of Greenway Road approximately 0.85 miles north of U.S. 41 in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. The easterly 36.75 acres of the property was rezoned from RSF-5 to RPUD in June 2005 and has been developed with 184 single-family attached dwelling units. An additional 116 units are proposed on the remainder of the site which is currently zoned Rural Agricultural (A). The subject property is located in the Urban Mixed Use -Urban Residential Land Use category. This land use category permits a variety of residential dwelling types and a density of up to eleven (11) units per acre may be allowed through the Density Rating System and Affordable Housing Bonus program. The undeveloped portion of the site is mostly surrounded by existing development, including Naples Reserve to the north, West Wind Estates Mobile Home Park to the south, Regal Acres RPUD to the east, and Reflection Lakes to the west. The property has direct access onto Greenway Road, a local roadway that intersects with U.S. 41 to the south. Sewer and water will be provided by Collier County Utilities. Other public facilities and community services are also currently available to the site. A mixed-use activity center subdistrict providing support commercial uses is located at the intersection of U.S. 41 and Collier Boulevard (CR 951) approximately 3.4 miles to the northwest. The surface water management system for the developed portion of the site is permitted through the South Florida Water Management District under Environmental Resource Permit No. 11-03051 and includes two wet detention lakes discharging to the Collier County Canal System at the Greenway Road Swale. Runoff from the proposed development site will be collected by a series of swales and inlets and directed to a proposed water management lake which will be connected to the existing lake system. The outfall location for the overall project will remain unchanged but the outfall structure will be modified to accommodate the new flows. Due to the interconnected nature of the project, the minimum road and finished floor elevations in the developed and undeveloped portions of the project are anticipated to be the same. Regal Acres Phase II RPUD - Evalaution Criteria Narrative August 2017 Page 1of6 EiVGIN EEN E�RiIGll Packet Pg. 307 9.A.7 The lakes will provide the detention volume required to meet the South Florida Water Management District's treatment and attenuation requirements. The system will attenuate the runoff from the site to the allowable discharge rate of 24 csm (cubic feet per second per square mile) per the Belle Meade study. This discharge rate is consistent with the pending amendment to the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances to reduce the maximum allowable off-site stormwater discharge rates. The traffic study submitted as part of this application determined that all roadway segments surrounding the project site are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS at project build- out and no additional roadway improvements are warranted. 2 Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. Habitat for Humanity of Collier County is the owner of the property and has demonstrated unified control through the various affidavits provided as part of this application. Operation and maintenance responsibility for community areas and facilities shall be assigned to the Habitat for Humanity of Collier County. The development will be required to go through platting and/or site development plan approval, which will further document the proper stipulations and assignments of responsibility for operation and maintenance of infrastructure by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. The proposed residential development will allow a variety of residential uses, including single- family detached, single-family attached, zero lot line, townhouse and multi -family units. Other proposed uses include water management lakes, preserves, ancillary recreational uses, open space and internal roadways with sidewalks. The proposed project will be designed in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) as indicated below. The subject property is located within the Urban Mixed Use -Urban Residential Subdistrict, as depicted on the Collier County Future Land Use Map (FLUM). According to the Growth Management Plan (GMP), the intent of the Urban Mixed Use District is to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including mixed-use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. The Urban Residential Subdistrict provides for higher densities in areas where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated and there are fewer Regal Acres Phase II RPUD - Evalaution Criteria Narrative August 2017 Page 2of6 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 308 9.A.7 environmental constraints. The Urban Residential Subdistrict permits a base density of four (4) residential units per gross acre. The project is also located within the Coastal High Hazard Area and the Growth Management Plan states that one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre shall be subtracted from the eligible base density. Additionally, the project will provide affordable -workforce housing and may be subject to adding an additional eight (8) units per acre. As such, the subject property is eligible for a maximum of eleven (11) units per acre under the adopted Density Rating System. The request is for a maximum density of five (5) dwelling units per gross acre. This is well within the density limitations of the Density Rating System and is consistent to the approved density adopted on the previously developed portion of the property under Ordinance 05-36. The subject property is located within an Urban Designated Area which has the necessary infrastructure and public facilities available to support the proposed residential planned development. Potable water and central sewer will be provided by Collier County Utilities. Other existing services and community facilities which are presently available include: Fire Protection: The property is within the East Naples Fire District. Station 23 is located at 6055 Collier Boulevard, approximately 4.2 miles away. Police Protection: The East Naples Substation is located at 8075 Lely Cultural Parkway approximately 8 miles away. Emergency Medical: Medic Station 23 is located at 6055 Collier Boulevard, approximately 4.2 miles away. Medical: Physicians Regional Hospital is located at 8300 Collier Boulevard, approximately 7.4 miles away. Public Schools: Manatee Elementary School is located at 1880 Manatee Road, approximately 2.8 miles away. Manatee Middle School is located at 1920 Manatee Road, approximately 2.8 miles away. Lely High School is located at 1 Lely High School Boulevard, approximately 7 miles away. Libraries: South Regional Library is located at 8065 Lely Cultural Boulevard, approximately 7.8 miles away. East Naples Library is located at 8787 Tamiami Trail East, approximately 7.9 miles away. Public Parks: Collier Seminole State Park is located at 20200 Tamiami Trail East, approximately 6 miles away. Regal Acres Phase II RPUD - Evalaution Criteria Narrative August 2017 Page 3 of 6 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 309 9.A.7 The subject property's proximity to these existing facilities and services demonstrates that the site is an appropriate location for residential development and the proposed request will promote growth to occur in an efficient and effective manner. This indicates compliance with Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Objective 3 as well as FLUE Policies 5.2, 5.3, and 5.5. The design of the project through Planned Unit Development techniques is also consistent with FLUE Policy 5.6. The proposed residential project will be will be compatible, with and complementary to, the surrounding land uses as required by FLUE Policy 5.4. Most of the properties surrounding the undeveloped portion of the site have already been developed with similar residential uses. Perimeter buffering and other design features to further promote internal and external compatibility are documented in the response to Evaluation Criteria #4. The proposed development will also be consistent with Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 of the Future Land Use Element. Vehicular ingress and egress to the proposed additional lands will be provided via an extension of Majestic Circle and an internal loop road with sidewalks. The sidewalk system will also interconnect with the existing neighborhood which will link the recreation area and other common open space areas within the community. Interconnections with the existing developments to the north, south and west are not feasible given the location of buffers, preserve areas and platted lots which presently exist on these properties. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed development will be compatible with the existing residential uses that border the undeveloped portion of the site. These uses are described below along with the proposed design parameters and buffering provisions provided to ensure compatibility with each adjacent use. To the north is Naples Reserve, a 1,154 unit residential development with zoning designation of RPUD. The project has an approved at a density of 1.67 dwelling units per acre and has an 80 foot buffer tract which abuts the northern property line of the subject property. The proposed development will provide a 10 foot Type "A" landscape buffer along this property line. In addition, a lake and preserve area will also be provided in the northern portion of the subject property, creating a minimum building separation distance of approximately 375 feet Regal Acres Phase II RPUD - Evalaution Criteria Narrative August 2017 Page 4 of 6 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 310 Eagle Lakes Park is located at 11565 Tamiami Trail East, approximately 9.8 miles away. Public Transit: Collier Area Transit (CAT) Route 24 runs along U.S. 41 approximately 0.85 miles south of the subject property. The subject property's proximity to these existing facilities and services demonstrates that the site is an appropriate location for residential development and the proposed request will promote growth to occur in an efficient and effective manner. This indicates compliance with Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Objective 3 as well as FLUE Policies 5.2, 5.3, and 5.5. The design of the project through Planned Unit Development techniques is also consistent with FLUE Policy 5.6. The proposed residential project will be will be compatible, with and complementary to, the surrounding land uses as required by FLUE Policy 5.4. Most of the properties surrounding the undeveloped portion of the site have already been developed with similar residential uses. Perimeter buffering and other design features to further promote internal and external compatibility are documented in the response to Evaluation Criteria #4. The proposed development will also be consistent with Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 of the Future Land Use Element. Vehicular ingress and egress to the proposed additional lands will be provided via an extension of Majestic Circle and an internal loop road with sidewalks. The sidewalk system will also interconnect with the existing neighborhood which will link the recreation area and other common open space areas within the community. Interconnections with the existing developments to the north, south and west are not feasible given the location of buffers, preserve areas and platted lots which presently exist on these properties. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed development will be compatible with the existing residential uses that border the undeveloped portion of the site. These uses are described below along with the proposed design parameters and buffering provisions provided to ensure compatibility with each adjacent use. To the north is Naples Reserve, a 1,154 unit residential development with zoning designation of RPUD. The project has an approved at a density of 1.67 dwelling units per acre and has an 80 foot buffer tract which abuts the northern property line of the subject property. The proposed development will provide a 10 foot Type "A" landscape buffer along this property line. In addition, a lake and preserve area will also be provided in the northern portion of the subject property, creating a minimum building separation distance of approximately 375 feet Regal Acres Phase II RPUD - Evalaution Criteria Narrative August 2017 Page 4 of 6 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 310 9.A.7 between the nearest dwelling unit in Naples Reserve. To the south is West Wind Estates, a 270 unit mobile home park. The project has a zoning designation of MH and a density of approximately 4.6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development will provide a 15 foot Type "B" landscape buffer along its southern property line. Additional buffering will also be provided by a preserve area along a portion of this boundary. The applicant also seeks a deviation to allow an 8 -foot tall wall to further provide buffering and protection given the proximity of the adjoining drainage ditch to the south of proposed recreation area. The existing Regal Acres development occupies the eastern boundary of the subject additional development area. The existing development contains 184 unit residential development with a zoning designation of RPUD that was approved at a density of 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development will become the second phase of this project and will be designed with a unified architectural theme, interconnected sidewalks and pathways, and shared recreational amenity areas. The proposed property regulations will maintain the maximum approved building height of 35 feet and the overall density will remain at 5 dwelling units per acre. To the west is Reflection Lakes, a 612 residential development with a zoning designation of PUD. The project was approved at a density of 3 dwelling units per acre and has a 140± foot wide preserve area adjacent to the western boundary of the subject property, aligning with the proposed preserve on the subject property. The proposed development will provide 5.8 acres of contiguous preserve area on site which will provide a building separation distance of at least 300 feet from the nearest dwelling unit in Reflection Lakes. In addition to the above -referenced residential developments, there is also a vacant 1.35± acre parcel to the east and a 10.55± acre parcel located to the northeast with a mobile home. Both parcels have a Rural Agricultural zoning designation, however, they have the same Urban Mixed Use -Urban Residential Subdistrict Future Land Use designation as the subject property and could be rezoned for similar residential uses in the future. A 10 foot Type "A" landscape buffer is proposed where the subject property abuts these parcels. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed development will provide a minimum of 60 percent common open space as required by the Collier County Land Development Code. Usable open space areas include common areas, pedestrian walkways, lakes, a recreation area, and a 5.8 acre preservation tract. The preserve area is 25 percent of the additional land area, meeting native preserve requirement. Regal Acres Phase II RPUD - Evalaution Criteria Narrative August 2017 Page 5of6 ENENGINEENE RING Packet Pg. 311 9.A.7 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. It is documented above that adequate public and private facilities are currently in place to serve the proposed development. Water and sewer service is available. Existing roadway capacity and drainage features are adequate for the site; and schools, police, fire, bus, park, and health care facilities are all located within the proposed development's service area. Waste management, cable, electric, and telephone services are also available. The development is part of the US 41 Developers Consortium for the US 41 widening and intersection improvements at the CR 951 and US 41 intersection as referenced in the TIS provided at the time of rezone. Per the Developer Contribution Agreement (OR 4408 PG 2880), improvements consisted of improvements at the intersection of CR 951 and US 41, six - lane road improvements from the intersection of CR 951 and US 41 to Henderson Creek, and four -lane road improvements from Henderson Creek to 0.25 miles east of Naples Reserve Blvd. Per the Impact Fee and Anticipated Advancement of Road Impact Fee table included in the Developer Contribution Agreement, road impact fees in the amount of $1,445,967.60 has been paid for the existing Regal Acres 184 -unit subdivision, and $471,511.20 has been paid for 60 of the 116 additional dwelling units associated with proposed Regal Acres II. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The subject property is an infill parcel that is already almost completely surrounded by existing development. Given these constraints, the future expansion of the project is extremely limited. The only potential expansion that could possibly occur would be to the north of the developed portion of the site where there is a vacant 1.35± acre parcel and a 2.46± acre parcel with an existing single-family residence. Farther north is a 10.55± acre parcel with an existing mobile home. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed development conforms with the intent of the PUD regulations by establishing development regulations that are consistent with similar residential developments throughout Collier County. The requested deviations provide design flexibility that will help improve the overall project while furthering public purposes of health, safety and welfare. Regal Acres Phase II RPUD - Evalaution Criteria Narrative August 2017 Page 6 of 6 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 312 m L V a PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM r a Packet Pg. 313 9.A.7 Coilielr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: C Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership See Attachment 1. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 314 Collie' r County 9.A.7 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: e f [* Name and Address I % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the III IL.CI J, JLUL.RI IUIUCI J, UCI ICI IL.IQI ICJ, UI PCII LI ICI J. Name and Address % of Ownership GHU, LLC parcel #00737720006 under contract for purchase by Habitat for Humanity, Inc. See Attachment 1. Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address Date subject property acquired See Attachment 2. ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 315 CO leer CON COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net Date of option: 9.A.7 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: . or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 7 (±!911�v r Signature Laura DeJohn - Johnson Engineering, Inc. Agent wner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 I _K fi Date Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 316 9.A.7 ATTACHMENT 3 REGAL ACRES RPUD List of Ownership and Corporation Parties for Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. Percentage of Ownership Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. 100% of Folio #s 00737760008 00741080606 00738280008 00741100104 00737720006 See attached SunBiz report for registered agent/officer details. Regal Acres RPUD - List of Ownership and Corporation Parties August 2018 Page 1of1 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 317 Detail by Entity Name Florida Department of State an a/jluiul Awe ujFlurida website Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Detail By Document Number / Detail by Entity Name Florida Not For Profit Corporation HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. Filing Information Document Number 742136 FEI/EIN Number 59-1834379 Date Filed 03/20/1978 State FL Status ACTIVE Last Event AMENDMENT Event Date Filed 11/05/1999 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 11145 TAM IAM I TRAL EAST NAPLES, FL 34113 Changed: 03/09/2005 Mailinq Address 11145 TAM IAM I TRAL EAST NAPLES, FL 34113 Changed: 03/09/2005 Reaistered Aaent Name & Address Cunningham, John 841 Partridge Ct MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 Name Changed: 02/03/2017 Address Changed: 02/03/2017 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title S MUELLER, MICHAEL 1109 STRAWBERRY COURT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 Page 1 of 3 9.A.7 DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS Packet Pg. 318 http://search. sunbiz.org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 10/25/2017 Detail by Entity Name Page 2 of 3 9.A.7 Title VC SWIHART, STANARD MD 789 REGENCY RESERVE CIR APT 4603 NAPLES, FL 34119 Title Chairman of the Board CUNNINGHAM, JOHN W 841 PARTRIDGE CT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 Title CEO LEFKOW, LISA REV. 1490 NOTTINGHAM DR NAPLES, FL 34109 Title President KOULOHERAS, NICK 6130 CYPRESS HOLLOW WAY NAPLES, FL 34109 Title VC Hubbard, Edward 785 Cocobay Drive Naples, FL 34108 Title VC Jilk, Craig 4101 Gulf Shore Blvd N 105 Naples, FL 34103 Title VC Peterson, Doug 849 Swan Dr. Marco Island, FL 34145 Title Treasurer Deal, Rick 2495 Rue Du Jardin Unit 402 Naples, FL 34105 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date Packet Pg. 319 http://search. sunbiz.org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 10/25/2017 Detail by Entity Name 2016 02/01/2016 2017 02/03/2017 2017 08/29/2017 Document Images Page 3 of 3 9.A.7 08/29/2017 -- AMENDED ANNUAL REPORTI View image in PDF format 02/03/2017 -- ANNUAL REPORT I View image in PDF format 02/01/2016 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/12/2015 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/25/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/22/2013 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/25/2012 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/25/2011 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/05/2010 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/23/2009 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/26/2008 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/08/2007 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/25/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/09/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/20/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 05/02/2003 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/04/2002 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/06/2001 --ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/06/2000 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/05/1999 -- Amendment View image in PDF format 03/11/1999 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/04/1998 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/26/1997 -- Name Change View image in PDF format 01/31/1997 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 01/24/1996 -- ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations to Itt Iq to N �L CL 7 Y V M m C E L V M ++ a Packet Pg. 320 http://search. sunbiz. org/Inquiry/corporationsearch/S earchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 10/25/2017 ATTACHMENT 2 REGAL ACRES RPUD Date Property Acquired and Warranty Deeds August 2018 9.A.7 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 321 ENGINEERING TO: James Sabo, AICP FROM: Laura DeJohn, AICP SINCE 1946 DATE: August 6, 2018 PL20170001733 - Regal Acres RPUD RE: Deed dated 6/28/18 The attached Warranty Deed dated June 28, 2018 documents the transaction of the parcel identified as Folio 400737720006. In the initial application for the referenced rezone (PL20170001733) this parcel was indicated as under contract for purchase by Habitat for Humanity, Inc. Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. is now the owner. Please include this deed as part of your file, replacing the previous owner information and prior deed for this parcel. We will also include this deed in the applicant's backup material for the CCPC. 2350 Stanford Court . Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 434-0333 . Fax (239) 434-9320 a� U a M M ti 0 0 0 0 N J a N G D a cfl m A 2 �L Ccc G V m cd G L V a Packet Pg. 322 This Document Prepared Without Ovinion of Title By. Carlo F. Zarnpogna, Esquire Zampogna Law Firm 1112 Goodlctte Rd., No., Ste. 204 Maples, Florida 34102 Telephone: (239) 261-0592 Parcel ID No.: 00737720006 Deed Consideration_ 5250.000.00 Documentary Stamps Due on Transfer: $1,750.00 11lt� !°►'� THIS INDENTURE, made this ; 'r' day of .lune, 2018, between G.H.L., L.L.C, an Ohio limited liability company, whose address is: 8654 Camelot Drive, Chesterland, Ohio 44026, and NEWELL CREEK, L.L.C., an Ohio limited liability company, whose address is 7975 Newell Creek Drive, Mentor, Ohio 44060, together with Nicholas DiCillo a/k/a Nichols K. DiCillo and Joan DiCillo, Husband and Wife, whose post office address is: 8654 Camelot Drive, Chesterland, Ohio 44026, as GRANTORS`, and HABITAT FOR HUMI ANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC., a Florida not for profit corporation, as GRANTEE*, whose post office address is: 11145 Tamiatni Trail East, Naples, Florida 34113. WITNESSETH, that the Grantors, for and in consideration of the sutra of TEN DOLLARS (S 10.00), and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantors in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and. sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of Collier, State of Florida, to -wit: The West !/2 of the East!/:! of the Northwest l of the Northeast !4 of Section 12, Township 51 South, Ravage 26 East, Collier County, Florida, excepting the North 30 feet thereof, which is reserved for road purposes. SUBJECT TO taxes for the year 2018 and subsequent years; zoning, building code, and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; and restrictions, reservations and easements common to the subdivision. TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. And the Grantors hereby covenant with said Grantee that the Grantors are lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantors have good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. And said Grantors do hereby further warrant that at the time of this conveyance, the subject property is vacant land and therefore it is not the Grantors' homestead nor is it the homestead of any family member within the meaning set forth In. the constitution of thr, Statc of Florida, nor is it contiguous to or part of homestead property. Grantors' residence and homestead address are as listed above. U Page 1 of 4 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 323 To have and to hold in fee simple forever. *Singular and plural are interchangeable as context requires. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: 9.A.7 G.H.U., L,L.C., an Ohio limited liability f� company, Sy� Signature of titi itiiies�'p I O iCillo l, b m: Onager Priat Name of Witness #.I Jai Signature s iT2 k J Ifti p' r r t Print Name of Witness #2 i STATE OF i— ""-i' i COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before ine this _,4,L day of June, 2018 by Joan DiCillo, as Manager of G.H.U., L.L_C., an Ohio limited liability company, wl o is (check appropriate box) ] personally known to me or who [ produced as identification. FL- d4r�ktL� 5 A Notary Public knA are T Printed Name: ,�-tom.; � . 1'tti ' �r. 7c Commission No. My Commission Expires: ARN. ARM STRO NG MYCOMMISSION #GG 04 8 7EXPIRES: October11r2038 Bonded ThNoryPbliUndevt rs Pagc 2 of 4 (SEAL) Packet Pg. 324 Signed, scaled and delivered in the presence of: Signature of Witness 41 22;�#� A &k1_2 Print Name of Witness �I Si ature`of Witness 9` Print Name of Witness #Z STATE OF ?hf o COUNTY OF 6642� NEWELL CREED, an Ohio limited liability company, By - Gloria DiCillo Its: Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this'- day of June, 2018 by GIoria DiCillo, as Manager of NEWELL CREEK; L.L.C.; an Ohio limited liability corn any, who is (c�xeek appropriate box) [__� personally known to the or who [ ✓] produced as identification. Notary Public Signatti e Printed Name. xl r7 C i "• � Commission No. My Commission Expires:✓ P i (SEAL) Prue 3 0f4 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 325 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written_ Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Signature Print Name of Witness n2 STATE OF--t:°'{�; COUNj"Y OF i ... ` Nicholas DiCillo, a/k/a Nichols K. DiCillo j9djx iCillo ,f The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , � � day of June, 2018 by Nicholas DiCillo a/k/a Nichols K. DiCillo, who is ( heck a proprz.ate box) [ _ personally known to me or who [ produced �� j -f' .�` i as identification and Joan DiCillo, who. is (check appropriate box) [�� personally known to me or who [ �� produced �_ j ,' L �Ii _ as identification. Notary Public Signature Printed Name_r,%�n; Commission No. My Corninission Expires: (SEAL) TARA N. ARMSTRONG MY COMMISSION #fGOSA317 P;= EXPIRES: October 11, 2979 %enFFgc` Bonded 7hruNoWryPuVcUnawflters Pagc 4 of a 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 326 Warranty Deeds Existing Regal Original Folio #s 00740760008, 00740480003, 00737400009 9.A.7 Q Packet Pg. 327 t QJ•SD necarding 4 �-i0 Documentary Stamps This doounant wad prepared by wad return for Constanas K. Burka, Isq. Lbore and tbkeler, P.L. 1107 last Inion Aveane, suite 112 Punta Garda, Florida 33930 PanelfDNsrbw 00740760008100740480003 Warranty Deed Thh Indenture, Meda this 1 3 "=_ day of April lugetae V. Fray, a married man, 3630709 OR: 391 II=19 14 011ICM AICalml of 06/02/2005 at 03:19?~ NIGIT I. leu., 1107 1 WOK AYI 1112 ?W1 GORA 1L 33950 5372 , 2005 AD., He"w"s of tk Cowty of COLLIM , stet= or rlorida , grantor, sad Habitat For unity of Collier County, Inc., a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida wmw .dd,e a is 11145 Tamiani Trail last, Naples, FL 34113 at stir Cnrey a Collier , Stee of Florida , grantee,. W}neneth &w dre GRATdM forted is ecm6deratioe of b sun of ------------------------Tw DCLLAM 1410) ----------------------- DOLLARS, =1 other sed ted rskAge win dmo m a GLWM m bud paid by GkAXTEE the receipt whereof s hereby wbwwi[*K hat [r=hed, bovamed and told ra dw said GRANITE otd GRANTM hats, wccanon dad n4pw fvmrrr, d,e fo[bwM dmmted Lao hdag and bring in du County of COLL= swse of Florida b .ger MM VISIT "A" ATTACH® HERETO AIii3 ] j ST THIS Kir-Tsm3cirs NADI A P .-Jn9=r.F�� The property herein conveyed DOES MT the RMU STZAD property of the Grantor. The..Arant:orIn RQ60LSTZAD ss is 4104 Oa1f Shore Sled. Po. PS2, r 34103-29 ,3. Subject to res any, and taxes record, if dad dw s=Jw dna ba*y fall!' wwrom the u* to %rid God, and wi31 defend the wane agwmet IswU clrcaa of atl Psora it homemot. In Wihwu Whereof, et tj ago. ho beteanto bet ha hi -d -d teal dw day rind yeer frrx aborc wda & SissiA seated and id ddiren d in our prpence: Printed Flame: V129Qne D. Fray witness P-0. Addnw 4191 GaffSiore EhL Tia RRI rl n ,7 E ..t - 1 TrAnE& Ft. se13-2063 Printed NAM= lr/omar,1 A4& to wit m"s STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF D nJJ3[R % 3 The lonVomj motim wet -m - �—' 'Fed halorc me dris r '� &y of April , 2005 by lugemle U . Frey ba n perwnaity known n me o: t.. � hiaFiarida tiut�s"4 �i Lisa B. Leflc�w No :azy Public "� �°�'""°s gyp'""' �r �G�' Garnrnissian # ❑D293446 ianzasz��yy Expires MarcD08p� •9crwdTrvrfMn-Inuarra.Inc 8043697919 roott..�� a.rd1. PG; COLLA! OHM, n Ste, UC ?ll 11.50 DOC -.71 .70 Packet Pg. 328 EXHIBIT "A" Parcel 1: *** 4R: 3812 PG: ll 9.A.7 Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, thence along the East line of said Section 12, North 00° 1120" East, 2743.15 feet to the East 114 corner of said Section 12; thence continue along said East line of Section 12, North 00° 27'50" East, 894.35 feet; thence North 89° 56'55" West, 443.00 feet for a Place of Beginning; thence North 89° 56'55" West, 475.53 feet; thence North 00° 34'06" East, 490.97 feet; thence South 89° 56'55" East, 474.64 feet; thence South 00' 27'50" West, 490.97 feet to the Place of Beginning; being in the Southeast 114 of the Northeast 114 of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. -AND- Parcel 2: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, thence along the-Eas"ine of said Section 12, North 00° 11'20" East, 2743.15 feet to the East 114 corner of sal[$ tan 12; thence continue along said East line of Section 12, on a bearingof North oQai"fast, 894.35 feet to a set tack; thence run North 89° 56'55" VL�e far 91$.53 feet to of iron pin with survey cap #LS 4273 which is the Point of Be t�rt; thence. --North 89° 56'55" West for 443.98 feet to the West line of the ou east 172�the Northeast 114, of said Section 12 which is marked by a set iron pi w SvrVe a #LS 4273; cc along said West line run North 00° 34'06" East o4`490.98. felt ate Northof the southeast 114 of the Northeast 114 of said S t1.24&Cc � � arked by aniron J*n with Survey Cap #LS 4273; thence along said line run South 89° 56' S" 001443.00 feet to a set iron pin with Survey Cap #LS 4� thence South 00° 26'S0� or 490.48 feet to the Point o of Beginning; being in the S4`fiei s 114 of the North of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collict", it3c,_Florida. -AND- - Parcel 3: TOGETHER WITH A Non-exclusive access easement for the benefit of Parcel 1 over and across the Southerly thirty (30) feet of following described property: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; thence along the East line of said Section 12, North 000 11'20" East, 2743.15 feet to the East 114 corner of said Section 12; thence continue along said East line of Section 12, North 00° 27'50" East, 894.35 feet for a Place of Beginning; thence North 890 56'55" West, 443.00 feet; thence North 00° 34'06" East, 490.97 feet; thence South 89° 56'55" East, 443.00 feet to the East line of said Section 12; thence along said East lime of Section 12 South 001 27'50" West, 490.97 feet to the Place of Beginning; Being in the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Packet Pg. 329 ' Moore and Waksler, P.L. 1107 W. Marion Ave., Suite 112 Punta Gorda, FL 33950 (941) 637-1955 FOLIO NUMBER: 00737440009 (Space above this line for tecor, *** 3303557 OR: 3452 PG; 3 9.,0,.7 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COD PL 12J0112H3 at 03:52FX DWIGHT E. 81OCI, CLERK CONS 10.00 RIC FEE 6.00 DOC -.74 .70 COPIES 1.00 RISC 1.00 t a Retn: �4G -S7 ri1p� 70' WARRANTY DE TAT FOR EUKHI?y 0 TAXIAXI TR E THIS WARRANTY DEED, is made the 15�t_ day of DecenibCTWM 9'D A111g Brainard, whose address is 124 13° Ave S, Naples, Florida 34102-7209 ("Grantor") to Habitat For Humanity of Collier County, Inc., a Florida Corporation, whosa address is 11550 Tamiami Trail Fast, Naples, Florida 34113("Grantee"): (Wherever used herein, the tennis "Grantors" and "Gran(ees" include all parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations) WTTNF.SSEiH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sura of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to Grantorin handpaidby Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee, all that rariain land situate, lying and being in the County of Collier, State of Florida, to wit The South 14 of the Northeast 114 of the N of the Northeast 114, less the East 3 County, Florida. .! C9 Subject to restrictions, This vacant property is not —Naples,-norida 34102-72t 4 and the South 1/2 of the South %: of the Northeast 114 ection ,_ ownship 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier of record, if an taxes subsequent to 2003. Nhe Grantor. The Grantor's homested address is: 12413" Ave S., TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. V 1 1 s�/ AND the Grantor hereby the title to said ]and, aid will defend the same against lawful clainis of all persons whomsoever. L IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set .' the day and year first above written Signed, Sealed and Delivered as to Each Grantor in the Presentee of STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER USAE.LEFKOW Cemm� r �C�91� y,; Y MY CCiAlMiS510N I CC 891858 pik-�j 311,'10q EXPIRES: Maw 4,2V 540" scow ThwNovo PWkw6wWAM The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of December, 2003, by Dan King Brainard, who is sonallyXnown to rm or who has produced as identification. ' `)"' Packet Pg. 330 9.A.7 Warranty Deeds Folio #s 00737760008, 00741080606, 00738280008, 00741100104 Q Packet Pg. 331 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00737760008 Site Adr. Name/Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E City NAPLES State I FL Zip 34113-7753 Page 1 of 1 9.A.7 ap No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 6B12 000100 012 6812 12 51 26 5.27 ;v a Legal 12 5126 W1/2 OF E1/2 OF E1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 LESS N 30 FT Millage Area • 25 Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER Use Code O 70 - VACANT INSTITUTIONAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) Date Book -Page Amount 01/04/06 3959-3581 $ 550,000 01/25/05 3921-645 $ 268,000 11/16/00 2744-746 $ 0 05/01/68 273-547 $ 0 r� a Packet Pg. 332 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=757462977&ccpaver=1707221124&Fol... 8/5/2017 d Millaae Rates O *Calculations c` ti School Other Total o 0 0 5.245 6.258 11.503 0 N 2016 Certified Tax Roll a (Subject to Change) G Land Value $ 79,0 a (+) Improved Value 9 to (_) Market Value $ 79,0 (-) 10% Cap $ 9,4 A 2 (_) Assessed Value $ 69,5 cc (_) School Taxable Value 1 Q. (_) Taxable Value I If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final — Tax Roll co M C d E t V r� r� a Packet Pg. 332 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=757462977&ccpaver=1707221124&Fol... 8/5/2017 l Return to: Cons t an cc M- B u rke 3161708 OR. 3959 rV, 35$1 J Name Moore and Waksler, P.L RECORDED to OFFICIAL RECORDS Address: t107 W. Marion Avenue of COLLISR COUNTY. FL a 0110412096 at 12:12PK DWIGNY Punta Gorda, Florida 33950 S. BROCK, CLERK CONS 590000.09 h This Instrument Prepared by; RIC F11 14,00DOC-.1D Constance M. Burke 3850,00 Moore and Waksler, PLL, Retrr 1107 W. Marion Avenue NOORE & WAKSL1R Punta Gorda, Florida 33950 1107 if KARION AVE C12 as a necessary incident to the fulfillment of conditions PII]PTA GORDA FL 33950 a l contained in a title insurance commitment issued by it, t Property Appraisers Parcel I -D- (Folio) Numberts): MULTIPLE Q � m File No. 1302-5-1164 M M WARRANTY DEED (CORPORATION) This Warranty Deed Made the day of December, 2005, by NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF MARCO ISLAND, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, who acquired title as New Life Community Church of Marco Inc., and having its place of business at 1361 Andalusia Terrace, Marco Island, Florida 34145, hereinafter called the grantor, to HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC., a Florida not -far -profit corporation, whose post office address is: 11145 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34113, hereinafter called the grantee, WTI•NESSETH: That said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 Do] Iars and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these presents grants. bargains, seiIs. aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the iR1 t c Band situate in Collier County, Florida, vin The West A of the East 'h of the East '/, of the Northeast'/. of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, excepting the North 30 feet thereof, which is reserved for road purposes, and The Fast'/2 of the East Y of the East 1/z of the Northwest V. of the Northeast'/, of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, excepting the North 30 feet thereof, which is rt;serv'ed for roadof,the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. � + -.v�, r •� •t ' �� TOGETHER with all the tenements etLi�nl+ts and lappuitenan 0 belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same "t4ffi le forever. And the for he mrensntid tee that the canto &� Y grantee grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully uartanLs the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of ail persons whomsoever, and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent in 2005, reservations, restrictions and easements of record, if any- Mlherewr used herein the terms "grantor, and 'grantee included all the panes to thi.e Inst ument, and the heirs. legal representale vss and assigns ofmdrvidual,r, and the successors and assigns cfcorporanoq• f In Witness Whereof, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name, and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized, the day and year first shove written. Signed, sealedand livered in our presence; ATTEST: antis Murphy a retan Witness Signature: Printed Name: IARs�vs Witness Signature: Printed Name: LL�q STATE OF FLORIDA ` COUNTY OF COLLIER NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF MARCO ISLAND, INC„ a Florida not-for-profit corporation, who acquired title as New Life Community Church of Marco Inc. 0 BY: / Reverend Thomas C. NrcCulley, President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisWl day of December, 2005, by Reverend Thomas C. McCulley as President and Francis Murphy, as Secretary of NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF MARCO ISLAND, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation. They are personalty known to me or who have produced driver licenses as identification. My Commission Expires: 6, f 3 7CA,1 N(3TARlf PUBIX-5 IF OF FLORIDA Michael K HatTis Printed Nam APL 13, 200 Notary Publifon etl 7M Atlantic 8o Co., to Serial Number � e. Packe Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 100738280008 Site Adr. Name/Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF CC INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST City NAPLES State FL Zip 34113 Map No. I Strap No. Section I Township Range I Acres *Estimated 6B12 000100 022 6812 I 12 51 I 26 1.35 m U Q Legal 12 5126 N1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 1.35 AC OR 875 PG 445 a� Millage Area 8 25 Millaae Rates O *Calculations ti Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total c Use Code A 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) Date Book -Page Amount 07/20/17 5418-840 $ 15,000 07/20/17 5418-838 $ 0 06/29/09 4467-1397 $ 0 07/01/80 875-445 $ 0 11/01/73 564-645 $ 0 r� a Packet Pg. 334 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=46794096&ccpaver=1710181149&F... 10/25/2017 0 N 2017 Certified Tax Roll a (Subject to Change) G Land Value $ 8,7 a (+) Improved Value 9 (_) Market Value $ 8,7 v (_) Assessed Value $ 8,7w ca •L (_) School Taxable Value $ 8,7 (_) Taxable Value $ 8,7 a If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Y V m r� a Packet Pg. 334 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=46794096&ccpaver=1710181149&F... 10/25/2017 INSTR 5432588 OR 5418 PG 840 RECORDED 7/24/2017 9:09 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $105.00 REC $18.50 CONS 515,000.00 Premed by and return to: W. Jeffrey Cecil Attorney at Law Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, LLP 9132 Strada Place Third Floor Naples, FL 34108-2683 239-593-2900 File Number: WJC-HH-MEYER Parcel Identification No. 00738280008 CONSIDERATION: $15,000.00 This Indenture made this 20th day of address is 4216 Kensington High St, Na Habitat for Humanity of Collier Cot Z' Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34114/Of Above This Linc For Recording Warranty Deed ATUTORYFi)vt- 689.02, F.S.) /1�Jx oto\ 34105-5667 of the Winrida not for pr+ Stdi`q of 9.A.7 and Dietmar Meyer whose post office Collier, State of Florida, grantor*, and tion whose post office address is 11145 zrantee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for in o i f "V D 40/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to s id t r in i gr t , r ipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to th ( eirs AM orever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier Cou orida, to -wit: The North 112 of the Southwe" 4 f the Northwest 1/4' h) �ast 114 of the Northeast 114 of Section 12, Township 51 South, 6 East, Collier County a. Subject to the following: a) ad valo lift}pci.. ;�n real property taxes for the year of closing and subsequent years; b) zoning, li d11tg. todf and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any, provided that none of the foregoing shall prevent use of the property for residential purposes. and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * -Grantor" and "Grantec" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. (REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANKI DoubleTlmei Packet Pg. 335 *** OR 5418 PG 841 *** In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness Name: .Sqc 066�i'irr Witnes e: - — -� , Witness Name: Witnes�e: State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknc Meyer, who [I are personally known [Notary Sealy Warranty Deed (Smrurory Form) - Page 2 (Seal) Dietmar Meyer (j 01 "t kt�(Seal) Ute Alber Meyer 9.A.7 17 by Dietmar Meyer and Ute Alber Lftoras identification. n Expire5: TSE CIR DoubleTim" Packet Pg. 336 AGNES GUIS ..�•�.,��,; r : Notary Public - State ox.Fl� My Comm. Expires Met 2� Commission 0 FF 09021 _'�; i„•” Bonded Two* Nstiwial Navy Warranty Deed (Smrurory Form) - Page 2 (Seal) Dietmar Meyer (j 01 "t kt�(Seal) Ute Alber Meyer 9.A.7 17 by Dietmar Meyer and Ute Alber Lftoras identification. n Expire5: TSE CIR DoubleTim" Packet Pg. 336 Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00741100104 Site Adr. Name/Address HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRAIL E City NAPLES Map No. Strap No. 6B12 000100 1006B12 State I FL Zip 34113 Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 12 51 26 1.4 U Q Legal 12 5126 E 1018.64FT OF N 30FT OF NW 1/4 OF NE1/4 Millage Area 8 25 Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER Use Code A 10 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) Date Book -Page Amount 10/18/17 5441-1853 $ 500 10/18/17 5441-1850 $ 0 04/19/68 270-867 $ 0 r� a Packet Pg. 337 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=46794096&ccpaver=1710181149&F... 10/25/2017 a� Millaae Rates la *Calculations ti School Other Total o 0 0 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 0 N 2017 Certified Tax Roll a (Subject to Change) N Land Value $ 1 a- (+) Improved Value (_) Market Value $ 1 v t° (_) Assessed Valuew $ 1 ca •L (_) School Taxable Value $ 1 (_) Taxable Value $ 1 a If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Y V m C d t V r� r� a Packet Pg. 337 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=46794096&ccpaver=1710181149&F... 10/25/2017 INSTR 5460540 OR 5441 PG 1850 RECORDED 10/19/2017 9:18 AM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC 527.00 INDX $1.00 This instrument was prepared without opinion of title by and after recording return to: Daniel K. Weidenbruch, Esq. FisherBroyles, LLP 2394 Tamiami Trail North Suite 100 Naples, FL 34103 239-227-2880 (Space above this tine for m"wdm don) AFFIDAVIT OF SOLE REMAINING_DIRECTOR/TRUSTEE BEFORE ME, the undersigned officer authorized to administer oaths, an this day personally appeared VIRGINIA L. MARLOWE-BURNS (formerly known as Virginia L. Marlowe) (the "Affiant'j, individually al remaining trustee/director of FARMERS' INVESTMENT CORP., a dissoly r> jr a Farmers' Investment Corporation) (the "Corporation"), who uponw�t+rly sworn, d says: 1. TheraWi;T!9tof fL$ yeariur2�erstands the obligations of an oath, and has personal knoo os�tatted hei�in 1 2. The t tog r ar ow ("R. Marlowe"), were the sole directors and officers 1 ti was fively dissolved in 1985. 3. R. M is deceased and, ul AfT'rant is the sole remaining trustee/director of the Corpo L 4. The an \ teeldirector of the Corporation, is duly qualified to act as trustee on be n and, in said capacity, is authorized to execute and deliver a deed (or deeds) o conveyance to any real property owned by the Corporation including, without limitation: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. VIRGMIA L. MA.RLOWE-BURNS (formerly known as Virginia L. Marlowe) individually and as the sole remaining trustee/director of FARMERS' INVESTMENT CORP., a dissolved Florida corporation Page 1 of 2 9.A.7 Y Q Packet Pg. 338 OR 5441 PG 1851 STATE OF FLORIDA } ss: COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was sworn to, subscribed and acknowledged before me thisL& day of0246 `, 2017, by VIRGINIA L. MARLOWE-BURNS (formerly known as Virginia L. Marlowe) individually and as the sole remaining trustee/director of FARMERS' INVESTMENT CORP., a dissolved Florida corporation, who U is personally known to me, or W has produced 11 L as identification. Page 2 of 2 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 339 *** OR 5441 PG 1852 *** EXHIBIT "A" The North 30 feet of the N*o'thtscsf L4 ('%W 1.4) of the Northeast 14 (A"E 1/4) of Section 12, TowuQ4) 51 South, Range 26 East. Collier Count', Florida, less and erceptiou that portion INIng in the West 11 of the West 1'2 of the Northwest 14 of the Northeast 14, Also being described as follows: The East 1,018.64 feet of the North 30 feet of the North" est 1 4 of the -Northeast 1 4 of Section 12. Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Florida. 4829-4450-4657, v.1 Y Exhibit A 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 340 INSTR 5460541 OR 5441 PG 1853 RECORDED 10/19/2017 9:18 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $3.50 REC 516.50 CONS $500.00 Daniel K. Weidenbruch Attorney at Law F'isherBroyles LLP 2390 Tamiami Trail North Suite 109 Naples, FL 34103 239-227-2880 Consideration: $500.00 Doe. Stamps: $3.50 This Warranty Deed made this A L. Marlowe), ac the sole surviving i Farmers' investment Co orate a office address is qLb Collier County, Inc., a Florida not fo� FL 34113, grantee: (whenever used herein the terms "grantor" i individuals, and the successors and assigns of 99 Above This Line For Recording Data] _ Warranty Deed 9.A.7 lJ� n Virginia L. Marlowe -Burns (a/k/a Virginia Board-,r�c�grs and as the sole remaining Trustee of orporat'W", ' Investment Coup.) whose post tor, and Habitat for humanity of -whosepov off,1 145 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, heirs, Ieg* representatives, and a3signs of Witnesseth, that said grantor, For consideration of the s of T6V /100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to r in hand paid by sa' ipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the tee, and grantees hid Forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier Coenty, to -wit: f ` The North 30 feet of the Northwest 1W l ortheast 114 (NE 1/4) of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 Fast, Collier Conoty, orlda, less and except that portion lying in the West 112 of the West 112 of the Northwest 114 of the Northeast 1/4. Also being described as follows: The East 1,018.64 feet of the North 30 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 114 of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 00741100104 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the some in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2016. Doub,eTlme• Packet Pg. 341 *** OR 5441 PG 1854 *** In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year fust above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witne a e: . YW jXot1,tA,�LA/ VirginlM '_Marlowe -Barns (a/k/a Virginia L. Marlowe), as the sole surviving member of the last Board of Directors and an the sole rensaining Trustee of Farmers' Investment Corporation, a dissolved Florida corporation, (aWa Farmers' Investment Corp.) K Co State of Florida 10 County of Z� b, }:,%. L.J The foregoing instrument was ackno t p the da f October, 2017 by Virginia L. Marlowe - Burns (wWa Virginia L. Marler), a e n %.spat Beard of Director and as the sole remaining Trustee of Farmers' Inives r ti diarporation, (a/k/a Farmers' investment Corp.) owe-Bnrns, who L� is per trall ] a v s Ii as identification. [Not" Seal] �1NM ;.4'pY ►Iii, Tl - - -- -" 4W LAURA KIRSCH 3 = Notary Public • State of FloriAa lJ - cpircs Commission * FF 938636 TN ,fes. My Comm. Expires Nov 23, 2019 CSR Wa, wnmv Peed - Page 2 poubletima. 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 342 I 9.A.7 I ampinAVIT ()F Muirim rnKITDni Packet Pg. 343 Cote r County 9.A.7 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Regal Acres (See attached legal description for Parcel B.) Parcel # 00737760008, 00741080606, 00738280008, 00741100104, 00737720006 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Re alAcresll planned unit development ( RPUD) zoning. We hereby designate Pavese Law Firm and Johnson Engineering, Inc. legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Owner Nicholas Nouloheras, Exec, VP for Habitat for Humanity of Collier County. Inc. Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) + pp � f Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this i �( day of r (;e' Z'7 2018 by 4�1� c Yrd �r�.� �1• 4L) who is personally known to me or has produced I erillcation. NORMALALIBERTE i J S�Y MY COMMISSION # GG 212836 Notary Pub] c EXPIRES; August 29, 2022 (Name type ed cr stamped) srE�► f��` $0,W T NU Nowt' prI�IC Underwr11vr8 2/21/2017 Page 10 of 16 Packet Pg. 344 REGAL ACRES II RPUD EXHIBIT A Parcel B Legal Description DESCRIPTION PARCEL No. 00737760008 & 00741080606 (ORB 3959, PG 3581) THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL' PARCEL No. 00738280008 (ORB 4467, PG 1397) NORTH 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TRACT 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 E. PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY TAX DEED OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 875, PAGE 445, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL No. 00737720006 (ORB 5514, PG 1964) THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONTAINING TEN (10) ACRES, MORE OR LESS, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEETTHEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL No. 00741100104 (ORB 5441, PG 1850) (PER TITLE COMMITMENT) THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 (NE 1/4) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTION THAT PORTION LYING IN THE WEST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4. ALSO BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE EAST 1,018.64 FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Regal Acres II RPUD - Legal Description August 2018 Page 1ofl R ENGINEERING 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 345 AFFIDAVIT OF REPRESENTATIC r a Packet Pg. 346 9.A.7 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20170001733 I, Nicholas Kouloheras (print name), as Executive Vice President (title, if applicable) of Habitat for Humanity ofCollier county, Inc. (company, If a plicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicantQcontract purchaserMand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/[ authorize Johnson Engineering, Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Nichol o eras, Signature Executive VP for Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Date The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on 9 I I l -1 (date) by Nicholas Kouloheras (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as Executive VP of Habitat for Humanity of Collier County,lnc. who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. STAMPiSEAL Fe— I y� AMANDA MAE MARTIN :Notary Public - SIM/ of Florida My Comm. Eapiras Jun 1�. 2016.•` Commisaioq # FF 95921 REV 3/24/14 )&m a.v a&- N pi V� � Signature of Notary Public Packet Pg. 347 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20170001733 I, �� v (print name), as�.( (title, if T�L applicable) of GHU, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1, I have Rall authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Habitat for Humaniryof coiner county and Johnson Engineering. Inc. to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership; then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 8-915- dor? Date The foregoing instrfamen was sworn t (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on I (date) by K- (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to e_or-A+Ky-#&s-prod ced (type of identification) as identification. :s Signature of Notary Phlilic �i:°yti•.. REBECCAPARATORE t, MY COMMISSION 0 GG 097673 EXPIRES: July 4, 2021 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwrhera CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3/24/14 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 348 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20170001733 1, Joan DiCillo (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of cHu, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Habitat for Humanity of collier county and Johnson Engineering, Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. Pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's 'Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that 1 have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that t facts stated in it are rue. Signature Date i STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on N t_1 I l (date) by Joanocnlo (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as Manager of c.H.u., L.L.C. who is personally known to me-ar-who-ha oduced (type of identification) as identification.7:�� STAMPlSEAL Snature of Notary bhc REBECCA PARATORE MY COMMISSION # GG 097673 t + p EXPIRES: July 4, 2021 ''•.�;'�, t°`'BontiedThru Notary PuDllc tJnderwrllera CP\08-COA-001151155 REV 3124114 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 34E AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20170001733 Nicholas Willo (print name), as Power of Attorney for Gloria OiGillo (the sole surviving directorl (title, If applicable) of Newell Creek, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 55. We/1 authorize Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. and Johnson Engineering, Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. Pres. • 1f the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER (( ($� The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on l ` (date) by Nicholasocillo (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as POA for Gloria 0011o, sole director of Newell creek, Lt C who is personally known to me or�cvholproddc`ec7 (type of identification) as identification. STA Signature of otary Public �y+^�'p'•• REBECCAPARATORE : MY COMMISSION # GG 097673 EXPIRES, July 4, 2021 l3ondod Thru Notary Publlc Underwriters CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3124114 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 35( AFFIDAVIT April 14, 2017 Newell Creek LLC, Ohio Gloria M. DiCillo 7975 Newell Creek Mentor, Ohio 44060 To whom it may concern, I give my permission to Nicholas K. and Joan D. DiCillo of GHU LLC, Ohio to speak on my behalf regarding the property that we co-own in Collier County Florida. Sincerely yours, Gloria M. DiCillo Newell Creek LLC, Ohio Dated this q4t`day o 6, 12017 M �6� Signat a of Affiant State o 0 County of�Gk_ Subscribed and sworn to, or affirmed, before me on this W+_ day of fl\ 201 y A cant Signature Notary Public e� ago My Commission Expires: 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 351 DUMAMA POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR SALE OFIREAL ESTATE ,� BY THIS DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY, I,,C maks, constitute, and appoint YJ4K a 1_ A5 e e.'//o �ho is my u3 (relations, e4# S' J and who I will refer to as my "Attorney", as my true and la attorney to act for me and in my ,CG e.. name, place and stead .l intend this instrument to be exercisable until revoked. My Attorney's powers are limited to the following: REAL PROPERTY: The powers of the Attorney include, but are not limited to, at public or private sale, the right to buy, sell, convey, bargain, assign, grant, transfer, lease and grant options or amend or modify any leases or options, on any and all real property owned by me now or in the future, including my homestead. Also, my Attorney may exchange, borrow against or mortgage any real property owned by me. Also, my Attorney may obtain liability, property damage, theft, flood, and any other type insurance. It is unnecessary to identify each piece of real property as my holdings might change over time. Or REAL PROPERTY: The powers of the Attorney include the right to contract for the sale and execute all documents necessary to sell or transfer the following described property. Street Address of Property; Am -44 -J4-' 6 ('11 7V�O= Legal Description of Property, if known: rd)• .0S3 7—,� gS — S.Ee-T i-Cw f f %//-,/ INDEMNIFY THIRD PARTIES: I hereby indemnify and hold harmless any and all third parties who rely on this Durable Power of Attorney and who have no knowledge of its revocation or its having been amended. This is intended as a "Durable Power of Attorney" within the meaning of Section 709.08, Florida Statutes, This Durable Power of Attorney shall not be affected by my disability, incapacity, or incompetence, except as provided by statute. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney on Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of Signed '797f Address: L'lwgw4 - "0i C,l to STATE OF N /ID CO' r OF �. 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 35e I HERESY CERTIFY that on this day before me,, an officer duty qualified to acknowledgments, personally appeared l01) a- 13.1 . // Personally known to me or who has presented a driver's license as identification, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing and acknowledged before me that he/she executed the same. =AP14SS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid on Notary Public Signature MY COMMISSION EXP aaaN� q .' ROBIN COLADAN©ELO No�t�t Pubs ftft Of ow NVCamn. Lvku Fes. 21.2W 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 35" DRAWINGS r a Packet Pg. 354 EXHIBIT A PARCEL A -MASTER PLAN EXISTING AGRICULTURAL ZONING 15' LANDSCAPE BUFFER/CANAL N 89'57'27' W 1361.53' SURVEY 475.61' SURVEY N 8956'55" W 1361.53' DEED EXISTING AGRICULTURAL ZONING UFFER .INE A Packet Pg. 355 N L iao o w iao (� a M M r O O O ti r O N J a. N 7 t0 t7 �L tU rt+ C(a G Q 3 Y LAND USE TABLE Aro ffi INFRASTRUCTU RED ROADS RESIDENTIAL & DRIVEWAY AC = 2.41 AC = 9.50 AC .6% 255.8% M W SUBTOTAL = 11.91 AC 32.4% LAKES = 5.63 AC 15.3% FLOOD PLAIN COMPENSATION = 2.98 AC 8.1% Q� RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE = 9.9 1AC 27.0% C OTHER OPEN SPACE = 6.32 AC 17.2% i SUBTOTAL = 24.84 AC 67.6% TOTAL = 36.75 AC 100.0% (� NUMBER OF UNITS = 184.0 W a DENSITY = 5.0 UNITS PER ACRE Packet Pg. 355 GREENWAY ROAD SECTION UNE O VACANT PARCEL A E � I f-5 I 0 I VACANT IR O OVERLAP AREA - r _ 15' L.B.E. RIGHT-OF-WAY 2 REC (TYPE ,B,) AREA � r o PROPOSED OAAC R �2 o C U.E.O I 1 R �\ R RESIDENTIAL — PARCEL B 7 SINGLE FAMILY I / UD R __�_/ R SIDEWALK TYP) .•• O 3O R ,'PRESERVE, EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN THE PRESERVE PRESERVE WALL BE USED TO SATISFY THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. o UD IM 15' L.B.E. (TYPE 'B') O MH RES DENTIAL MOBILE HOME PARK O PUD DEVIATION (TYPICAL) 9.A.7 27 — —� SECTION LINE 0 62.5 125 250 (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1"=250') RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY O NATIVE VEGETATION CALCULATIONS THERE WAS NO VEGETATION REQUIREMENT ASSOCIATED WITH PARCEL A NATIVE VEGETATION PARCEL B 22.46 AC 25% PRESERVE REQUIREMENTS 5.62 AC PRESERVE PROVIDED 5.62 AC LAND SUMMARY USE CATEGORY ACREAGE TOTAL SITE AREA 59.9± PARCEL A 36.75± PARCEL B 23.15± MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 300D.U.(5D.U./AC) PARCEL A 184 D.U. (5 D.U. l AC) PARCEL B 116 D.U. (5 D.U. l AC) REQUIRED I PROVIDED PRESERVE 5.62 PARCEL A (PROVIDED) N/A PARCEL B (PROVIDED) 5.62 OPEN SPACE REQUIRED 36.0 (60%) PARCEL A PROVIDED 22.05 (60%) PARCEL B PROVIDED 13.89 (607) 5'p ARIES 20' IN 0'-10' L.M.E. 40' 20' MIN. "EvARiES 10.8' NAVD (MAX.) CONTROL ELEVATION = 4.7' NAVD -- (WET SEASON WATER TABLE) ?'r OVERLAP AREA SECTION EXISTING LAKE TYPICAL RESIDENCE/EXISTING LAKE NOTES: 1. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS RPUD MASTER PLAN SET SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. 2. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS, LOTS/PARCELS, LAKES, AND OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SDP, OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. REGAL ACRES RPUD 2350 STANFORD COURT RPUD MASTER PLAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF t/ NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 EXHIBIT B PARCEL B COLLIER COUNTYPVAxE((2s )343430333 ENGINEERING E.B. #642 & L.B, #642 DATE PROJECT N0 FILE N0 SCALE SHEET JUNE 2018 01700780- 12-51-26 AS SHOWN B LEGEND PRESERVE AREA ® WATER MANAGEMENT AREA PUD BOUNDARY - RIGHT -OF -WAV PUD ADJACENTZONINGCLASSIFICATION LUC ADJACENT LAND USE 5'p ARIES 20' IN 0'-10' L.M.E. 40' 20' MIN. "EvARiES 10.8' NAVD (MAX.) CONTROL ELEVATION = 4.7' NAVD -- (WET SEASON WATER TABLE) ?'r OVERLAP AREA SECTION EXISTING LAKE TYPICAL RESIDENCE/EXISTING LAKE NOTES: 1. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS RPUD MASTER PLAN SET SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. 2. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS, LOTS/PARCELS, LAKES, AND OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT EITHER SDP, OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. REGAL ACRES RPUD 2350 STANFORD COURT RPUD MASTER PLAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF t/ NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 EXHIBIT B PARCEL B COLLIER COUNTYPVAxE((2s )343430333 ENGINEERING E.B. #642 & L.B, #642 DATE PROJECT N0 FILE N0 SCALE SHEET JUNE 2018 01700780- 12-51-26 AS SHOWN B 25' MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK U.E N. ACCESSORY SETBACK co 2' S' FENCE/WALL (POTENTIAL) L NATIVE PRESERVE IF F1 p AREA SIGN BERM GROUND TYPICAL STREET SECTION i� rt�n�vvnUUIItK TYPICAL ALLEY SECTION K— RPUD MASTER PLAN - PARCEL B HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF . tr CROSS SECTIONS COLLIER COUNTY ENGINEERING I 9.A.7 I T JP U.E I GREEN SPACE VARIE co L 11I Q Y V NOTES: (� 1. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS RPUD MASTER PLAT m SET SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. 2. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMEN y LOTS/PARCELS, LAKES, AND OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT = EITHER SDP, OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. Qct C JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. REGAL ACRES RPUD S 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PHONE: 434-0333 EXHIBIT B-2 M (239) FAX: (239) 334-3661 D— PROJECT N0. FILE N0. SCALE SHEET 'I, �! E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 JUNE 2018 0170078-00 12-51-26 AS SHOWN -2 Q - - - - _ _ _ _ _ (:RFENWA.Y BOAR_ - - - I SECTION LINE I I I I I I PARCEL A I I I I LAKE 1.0 AC II \�lyj II II II II PARCEL B PRESERVE PRESERVE I MASTER UTILITY AND DRAINAGE PLAN PARCEL B REC AREA UD HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY MH RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME PARK PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE ENGINEERING 1 O A 7 I I I 0 62.5 125 250 (INTENDED DISPLAY DISPLA®'= 250' SECTION LINE L) Q a� M M ti O O O ti Q 7 Y NOTES: 1. THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS RPUD MASTER PLAT m SET SHALL BE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. 2. THE DESIGN, LOCATION, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE LAND IMPROVEMEN y LOTS/PARCELS, LAKES, AND OR ENTRY POINTS SHALL BE DEFINED AT = EITHER SDP, OR CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. Q� JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. REGAL ACRES RPUD S 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 EXHIBIT B-3 0 PHONE: (239) 434-0333 M FAX: (239) 334-3661 DATE PROJECT N0. FILE N0. SCALE SHEET 3! E.B. 0642 & L.B. #642 JUNE 2018 0170078-00 12-51-26 AS SHOWN B-3 Q 9.A.7 rte. 0 75 1® 0 PROPOSED ADDITION TO (INTE ED DISPLAY SCALE: 1"=300') PUD BOUNDARY N l r 23.15 ACRES REFLECTION LAKES PARCEL B-- �IL - _- Aw 36.75 ACRES PARCEL A V m (D ea 2 CL 0 Y V m C d C JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. REGAL ACRES RPUD i 2350 STANFORD COURT EXISTING AND PROPOSED HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF t/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 EXHIBIT B-4 PHONE: (239) 434-0333 +�+ PUD BOUNDARY COLLIER COUNTY FAX: $(239) 334-3661 DA P0OJECT NE.B. 642 & . /642 0 D1 ALE SHEET BENGINEERING NE 2018 1700780 - ,2-5-26 AS SHOWN -4++ a NIM INFORMATION (affidavit of compliance, summary, sign in sheets, transcript) 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 360 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance of Wit) - State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 14K day of M , 2018 by LGS, A. -KA /1Gy0 �.rV , who isers�ly known to me or who has produced as identification. wt-,� MQ4 k", (Signature of Notary Public) AWANPA MAC M /A! Printed Name of Notary G:\NIM Procedures/Affidavit Of Compliance - NIM OCt2010.Doc (Notary Seal) ''" `��'•., AMANDA MAE MARTIN e NolarY Public - Slate of Florida y �= MY Comm. Expires Jun 19, 2018 Commisalon #► FF 95921 Packet Pg. 361 PAVES 9.A.7 NEALE MONTGOMERY IAWFIWW Direet dial: ' 335-0235 Emaii: eale e a nave aye I %vm 1833 Hendry Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33 90 1 1 P.Q. Drawer 1507, Fort Myers, Florida 33902-1507 ! (239) 334-2195 j Fax (239) 332-2243 May 18, 2018 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Habitat for Humanity of Collier County has submitted a petition to Collier County seeking Rezoning approval for the following described property: Property located on the west side of Greenway Road to be accessed via Majestic Circle The petitioner is asking the County to approve an application to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by changing the zoning classification of 23.15+1- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD. This change will amend the master plan to include the additional land and will increase the permissible number of dwelling units from 184 to 300. The request includes an affordable housing density bonus agreement for the added 23.15 acres that wilI generate 46 bonus units for low or moderate income residents on the described property. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of the intended development associated with this application. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday, June 4 at 5:30 p.m. at the First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples located at 14600 Tamiami Trail E, Naples, FL 34114. At this meeting the petitioner will make every effort to illustrate how the property will be developed and to answer any questions. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact me. NMlkac Sincerely, Near 4 63 2 VINCENNFs BLVD., SU)TE 101 4524 GUN CLUB ROAD, SuiTE 203 CAPE CORAL, FLORIDA 33904 WEST PALM BEACH, FLoR1DA 33415 Packet P 362 (239) 542-3148 (551) 471-1366 g' r Q Packet Pg. 363 vvu 09[8/09[go fuanyoane alglledwoo Will L9 x ww 9Z }ewaof op ananbq 09 [8/09 [9® fueAv gl!m alglledwoo „8/9 Z x,, [ azls lapel S31d 9.A.7 ABRAHAM, KERLANGE ACF 10-A REFLECTION LAKES III ADAMS, PAUL D 10310 KINGDOM CT LLC 171 LIME KEY LN NAPLES, FL 34114---3123 201 E WASHINGTON STSTE 1760 NAPLES, FL 34114---8419 PHOENIX, AZ 85004---2233 ALCE, JEAN J & MARIE M ALCIME, MARIO ALCIUS, JEAN SERGO 10441 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 10316 MAJESTIC CIR MARYSE PIERRE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 10315 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3128 ALEXANDRE, SOUZIE RAICHAFFEN ALLENDER, JAMES E & SUSANNE D ALVARADO, IDALIA C 10384 MAJESTIC CIR 14502 MANCHESTER DR 10282 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3110 ANDERSON, RAYMOND & PEGGY ANTOINE, JN DAVID APPERSON EST, BEATRICE I 11 CONOVER LN ELIZANNE ANTOINE JN CHARLES 240 OCEAN REEF LN CAPE MAY COURT H, NJ 08210---1467 10541 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---8446 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 TORRINGTON, CT 06790---0000 ARAQUISTAIN, MAURICIO J ARCAS, DOHANNYS L & ALINA ASHTON TAMPA RESIDENTIAL LLC 111 SUGARLOAF LN 10552 MAJESTIC CIR 1064 GREENWOOD BLVD #124 NAPLES, FL 34114---8430 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 LAKE MARY, FL 32746---0000 ASTEMBORSKI, MICHAEL B ATHALIE K WHEELOCK REV TRUST AUDIA JR, JOSEPH F JULIE F ABU-HAMDAN 280 MATECUMBE LN KATHLEEN T AUDIA 14559 MANCHESTER DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34114---8424 60 LIBERTY LANE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 TORRINGTON, CT 06790---0000 AUDIGE, CHIMENE A AUGUSTIN, JIMMY AYOTTE, CHANDLER 10251 KINGDOM CT KETLEY TANELUS 141 OCEAN REEF LANE NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 10537 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 AZOR, FLORENCE BAGLEY, STEPHEN E & MARY L BAIN, THOMAS 1 & MARILYN S 10509 MAJESTIC CIR 181 LIME KEY LN 255 HOWARD AVE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 LONG BRANCH, NJ 07740---8010 BALDWIN, TODD BARKER, TRENT ANTHONY BARRON TR, M 50 WEST BROADWAY CAITLYNN ASHLIE JOY CRITCHER GREENWAY ROAD TRUST SALEM, NY 12865---0000 10501 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 280 29TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34117---3123 BARROSO, ENRIQUE E DINZA BASTIEN, VIOLINE BAUTISTA-CRUZ, V BENITO GRACIELA IGLESIAS MORALES 10265 EMPEROR LN MODESTA VIRGINIA GOMEZ 10353 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---3105 10405 MAJESTIC CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 ST,PLESa label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Packet Pg. 364 etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 VV0 0918/0919® AJOAV ONE algjudwos ww L9 x ww 9Z p3nol op ananb113 � �� 0918/0915® Aj9AV gllM algljedwoo „8/5 Z x,, L azls lagBl BEAN, ROBERT S & KATHLEEN BEAUPLAN, ELIPHEN BEDNAR, ROBERT M & MARGOT B 10540 GREENWAY RD CHARITABLE BELIZAIRE 8384 VAN DR NAPLES, FL 34114---3107 10504 MAJESTIC CIR YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44514---2947 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 BEENERS, KEITH A & BECKIE L BELDOR, YANICK BELL, WILLIAM C & ROBERTA M 14527 MANCHESTER DR 10269 EMPEROR LN 111 OCEAN REEF LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3105 NAPLES, FL 34114---8415 BENAVIDES, JACINTO BERTRAND, GARY J & KARY J BONILLA, JESSICA ANA A ALMENDARIZ GARZA 14506 MANCHESTER DRIVE 10372 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 10239 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 BORDON, ERNESTT& DONNA BOYER, BEAUDELINE BOYER, GERLANDE 10551 GREENWAY RD 10231 KINGDOM CT 10481 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---3108 NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 BOYER, MICHAEL FRANCIS BOZEMAN, MARILYN BRAYTON, RICHARD & DEBRA L CHARMAINE BOYER 261 OCEAN REEF LN JEREMI K BRAYTON 14550 MANCHESTER DR NAPLES, FL 34114---8437 AMY C SARGENT NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 420 N STEVICK RD LIMA, OH 45807---2108 BRITTINGHAM, C WAYNE BRIZUELA, ERNESTO BROUWER EST, LESTER JAY VIVIAN P BRITTINGHAM MARITZA TORRES SUSAN IRENE BROUWER PO BOX 4082 10361 MAJESTIC CIR 201 OCEAN REEF LN DELAWARE CITY, DE 19706---4082 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 BROWNING, BRUCE R BUCHHEIT, DIANA LEE BUCKLER, CAROL R DIANA M ZOLECKI BROWNING 10328 MAJESTIC CIRCLE WILLIAM G =& ALVERNA BUCKLER 1945 LAKEWOOD DR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 141 GRASSY KEY LN WILMINGTON, IL 60481---1726 NAPLES, FL 34114---8403 CADET, JACQUELINE CAMIL, BETTY CANDELARIO, IVELKA 0 10413 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 10308 MAJESTIC CIR 10373 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3131 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 CAROL A CAFFERELLI LIV TRUST CASIMIR, YVONNE CASTELLAN, JUAN CARLOS 14555 GRAPEVINE DRIVE 10437 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 10513 MAJESTIC CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 CAZARES, DANIEL CERTAIN, RONALD J & CAROL E CESAR, DIEUSEUL & ISMELA ELMER A CASARES 16531 CLAYSTONE CT 10545 MAJESTIC CIR 10541 GREENWAY RD FORT WAYNE, IN 46845---9019 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 SRAKES etiquette do format 25 mm/x'67 mm ccompatiblelvaveAvery /®5060/8160 Packet Pg. 365 vvu 0918/0919® IUany sane aigitedwoa ww Lg x ww gZ }ewjo; op a}}anbq �� 091 ® ti 8/0919any gjinn aigijedwoo „8/q Z x,, I. ezis iagei 4 CHAMPAGNE, KIMBERLY CHARELUS, MYRIELLE CHARLES, MENARD 281 OCEAN REEF LN 10295 KINGDOM CT FRITZLEINE CHARLES ETIENNE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 10259 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 CIBRIAN, NOHEMI DE JESUS CIVIL, ALIX CKC PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC 10505 MAJESTIC CIR MARIE LUCIE CIVIL GEORGES 12135 COLLIER BLVD NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 10449 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34116---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 CLEMONS. DONNA L CLERCIRA, SAINNITA CODIO, LUC 10298 KINGDOM CT 10252 EMPEROR LN 10549 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---3110 NAPLES, FL 34114---3102 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 COLLAZO, YASNOVY CACERES COLLINS EST, DONALD F CONTE, NOWELL & HELEN KIRENIA RAMIREZ OJEDA % DONALD F COLLINS JR PR LAURA E MCDOUGALL 10388 MAJESTIC CIR 171 SUGARLOAF LN 161 OCEAN REEF LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---8430 NAPLES, FL 34114---8415 CORDEIRO, ASHLEY M D R HORTON INC DAMAS, DIEUNYTHA 10548 MAJESTIC CIR 10541 BEN C PRATT 10409 MAJESTIC CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY STE 100 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 FORT MYERS, FL 33966---0000 DAVIS, ERICAKA ANDREA DELISCA, MYRTIL DEMOSTHENES, MANOUCHECA 10448 MAJESTIC CIRCLE CHRISTINE DELISCA DUPUY 10572 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 10280 EMPEROR LANE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 DERVIL, JULIEN DIAZ, AGNIESKA MAYOL DIAZ, ALEJANDRA 10278 KINGDOM CT 10517 MAJESTIC CIR 10304 MAJESTIC CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34114---3110 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 DIEUJUSTE, MARIE NICOLE DIEUJUSTE, VIVIANE DIMAS, ADRIAN ASCENCIO 10368 MAJESTIC CIR 10256 EMPEROR LN OFELIA TELLEZ BAUTISTA NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3102 10533 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 DOBECK, KAREN R DORIA, REY & MARY DR HORTON INC 110 LIME KEY LN PO BOX 8539 10541 BEN C PRATT NAPLES, FL 34114---8418 NAPLES, FL 34101---8539 SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY STE 100 FORT MYERS, FL 33966---0000 DUNLEAVEY, FRANCES E DUPPSTADT, NILE ALLEN DURAN, MANUEL 131 SUGARLOAF LN 121 OCEAN REEF LN #103 RUBY C CAMPOS NAPLES, FL 34114---8430 NAPLES, FL 34114---8415 10249 EMPEROR LN NAPLES, FL 34114---3105 eSTAPLES" etiquette do/format 25 mmx r67 mm compatible e a ece with Avery �Avery /051060/8160 Packet Pg. 366 Vva 0918/09150 ><aany oaAe algltedwoe Iuw Lg x Will gZ 1ewjo1 op attanbq 331d � 0918/09 LSO fUaAV gjIm algl}eduwoo ,,g/9 Z x „ 1 azls lege) 9.A.7 DYNER LIVING TRUST E D & E M BLOCK REV TRUST EDMOND, IMMACULA 3908 FALCON DR 100 SUGAR LOAF LN 10243 KINGDOM CT NAPERVILLE, IL 60564---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 EGALITE, GULDINE ENAMORADO, RAMON FONSECA EQUITY TRUST CO 10290 KINGDOM CT CARMELINA DIAZ CARDOSA % ELIZABETH MARR NAPLES, FL 34114---3110 10271 KINGDOM CT PO BOX 451340 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 WESTLAKE, OH 44145---0000 ETIENNE, JOSE YOLDA FAIFE, JOSE A RODRIGUEZ FAIRHOMES SILVER LININGS 10306 KINGDOM CT LISSETT SAAVEDRA MARTINEZ PROPERTIES LLC NAPLES, FL 34114---3123 10318 KINGDOM CT 139 MAIN ST #203 NAPLES, FL 34114---8421 NAPLES, FL 34114---3123 UNIONVILLE, ON GAYO, MARLENE GELIN, FRIDA CANADA L3R 2G6 FAIRHOMES SILVER LININGS FERNE, ESHEDDLLING FISCHER, MICHAEL & PATRICIA PROPERTIES LLC 10314 KINGDOM CT 211 LIME KEY LN 2800 DAVIS BLVD # 200 NAPLES, FL 34114---3123 NAPLES, FL 34114---8421 NAPLES, FL 34104---0000 FITHIAN, HARRY M & DAWN A FLORIDA EPPARD TRUST FORESTAL, MARIE Y 210 OCEAN REEF LN 10350 GREENWAY RD 10255 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---8446 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 FORTUNA, MARISENA FRANK D BALDWIN REV TRUST FRASER TR, ROBERT G & JAYNE K 10276 EMPEROR LN 160 OCEAN REEF LANE J & R REALTY TRUST NAPLES, FL 34114---3102 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 UTD 2/3/97 633 SALEM ST GARCIA, YSMAEL PEREZ GASPARD, JEAN H LYNNFIELD, MA 01940---2307 FRAVOLA REVOCABLE TRUST FRESHMAN, DAVID J & SUSAN GAETAN, MARIE NANJIE 201 LIME KEY LN 14599 TOPSAIL DRIVE 10333 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---8421 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 GALDAMEZ, ZONIA P JANDRES GAMBLE, JOSEPH & KAREN GARCIA, JESUS 10560 MAJESTIC CIR 161 LIME KEY LN NANCY ROSAS NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 10263 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 GARCIA, YSMAEL PEREZ GASPARD, JEAN H GASPARD, RONALD MAGDELIS DIAZ RODRIGUEZ 10420 MAJESTIC CIR SHANRIKA D LEE 10465 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 10244 EMPEROR LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3102 GAYO, MARLENE GELIN, FRIDA GERBIER, WOUILNA 10401 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 10416 MAJESTIC CIR 10385 MAJESTIC CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34.114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 STAPLS@ label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Packet Pg. 367 (tiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160 ov0 0918/0914® tiany Dana aiglladwoa ww Lg x wuI 4Z jawjoj op a}}anbi;� o��d� 0918/0919® tiany y;Inn aigijadwoo „8/4 Z x „1 azis legal 9.A.7 GERMAIN, SYLVIE F GEUS, AMONCIA JEUNE GHU LLC 10302 KINGDOM CT 10266 KINGDOM CT RONALD MONACHINO NAPLES, FL 34114---3123 NAPLES, FL 34114---3110 NEWELL CREEK LLC 8654 CAMELOT DR CHESTERLAND, OH 44026---3104 GIBBONS, COREY & YVONNE GONZALEZ, CARLA E ANDRADE GONZALEZ, IRIS A 14590 MANCHESTER DRIVE 10452 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 10424 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 GONZALEZ, LUIS A GONZALEZ, MISHAEL GRAHAM, ERNESTO DAISY ANTONIA CARRILLO 10469 MAJESTIC CIR NORBERT W GRAHAM 10429 MAJESTIC CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 14503 MANCHESTER DR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 GRESSEAU, PIERRE GRIFF, DOUGLAS L & SARA C GUILLOU, ROBERT CHARLES FLORENCE FERNAND FLOREAL 10444 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 14583 MANCHESTER DRIVE 10485 MAJESTIC CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 GUNDERSON, KENNETH N GUSTAVE, ROSELINE GUZMAN, JESUS G FIGUEROA 271 OCEAN REEF LN 10412 MAJESTIC CIR VALERIA E ZAMBRANO PACHECO NAPLES, FL 34114---8437 NAPLES, FL 34113---0000 10585 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY HADA, ASHER K & IRAIDA HAMMOND, MADLYN OF COLLIER COUNTY 14535 MANCHESTER DR 270 GRASSY KEY LANE 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34113---0000 HARRIS, DEBRA KAY HATCH, SIMONE HERNANDEZ, ARTURO PINA 191 OCEAN REEF LN 10357 MAJESTIC CIR JUANA REYES BAUTISTA NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 10556 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 HERNANDEZ, JESSICA R HERNANDEZ, ZYNNIA E HILL, ROSE M 10253 EMPEROR LN 10508 MAJESTIC CIR 10544 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---3105 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 HOCKMAN, JANICE HODAPP, DEAN A & VIRGINIA L HUGHES, LORI 139 HOCKMAN DR 14551 MANCHESTER DRIVE 14578 MANCHESTER DRIVE AUGUSTA, WV 26704---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 HUTCHINS, DORREL I IACOVIELLO, STEFANO & CATHY INGUNZA, FELIZ 10377 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 14546 MANCHESTER DR 10268 EMPEROR LANE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 TA LESS etiquette doe eformat 25 mm/ xn67 mm coimpat b eve ec�Avery/®51060/8160 Packet Pg. 368 JACQUES, CHRICITA 10299 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 JASMIN, BRASELYE & JACQUELINE 10588 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 JOHN E ONAN INTER TRUST 14511 MANCHESTER DR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 JOSEPH C WHITING JR REV TRUST 14531 MANCHESTER DR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 JOSEPH, SHAILAJA V 10319 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---3128 KERN III, OTTO & VALERIE B 120 OCEAN REEF LN NAPLES, FL 34114---8445 KIMBERLY CHAMPAGNE REV TRUST 181 FOREST HILLS BOULEVARD NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 KRON, SANDRA 221 LIME KEY LANE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 LAFONTANT, ALINE 10286 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---3110 LARA, EDIDT IA 10421 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 09[8/09[90 tianyDane olq!jVqj! 9lgjwoo tuw Zg x wuJ 9Z azis l op a anbl}3 ;:S��d 0918/0919® JGany yllM alglJedwoo „g/9 Z x „ ails lagel 9.A.7 JAMES FAMILY REV LIVING TRUST JASINSKI, ELIZABETH J 14491 MANCHESTER DR 151 SUGARLOAF LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 JAYNES, JANICE JEAN, MARTINE DONNA VANNETT 10254 KINGDOM CT 7 MORGAN ST NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MELROSE, MA 02176---1214 JOHN H WATKINS JR REV TRUST JONES, ANDREA LINDA M WATKINS REV TRUST 10493 MAJESTIC CIR 10 LOCKE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 SEABROOK, NH 03874---0000 JOSEPH, ADIENS & MARYSE JOSEPH, MIREILLE 10327 KINGDOM CT 10568 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---3128 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 KACOS, MICHAEL G KENNEY, WILLIAM P 14515 MANCHESTER DR 14554 MANCHESTER DR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 KETCHUM, LUKE A & DARCY RUTH KEY, KRYSTAL LYNN 4621 CITATION COURT 10250 KINGDOM CT BATAVIA, OH 45103---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3110 KORAKAS, GEORGE S & MELANIE D KOSTKA, ELAINE M 150 SUGARLOAF LN 211 OCEAN REEF LN NAPLES, FL 34114---8429 NAPLES, FL 34114---8437 LACOSTE, JEAN B LACROYANCE, CEFRANCILE JOSEPHINE ROZIER 10291 KINGDOM CT 10279 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 LAITIL, GUERDA 10581 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 LEANDRE, BOURGEOT KETHLINE L CHARLES LEANDRE 10369 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 LANDIS, GORDON S & SARAH G 6497 MIRIAM CIR EAST PETERSBURG, PA 17520---1136 LEONARD, DOROTHY 151 LIME KEY LN NAPLES, FL 34114---8419 /STAKES Etiquette do format 25 mmx'67 mm compatible compat b e a eAvery /051060/8160 Packet Pg. 369 VVu LINDOR, COULANGE MARIE 10489 MAJESTIC CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 LOPEZ, VICKY ROSANNA 10296 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---3129 LOUIS, JUDE MARTINE DESINOR 10303 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---3128 MADORE, DAVID E & KATHLEEN A 130 SUGARLOAF LN NAPLES, FL 34114---8429 MAREUS, MILER FRANTZCIA DOSSOU 10376 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MARTINEZ, ISMAEL C & ROSSI 10473 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MATOS, MARIBEL 10260 EMPEROR LN NAPLES, FL 34114---3102 MCDONALD, CLAYDER HIDALGO YARITZA LOYOLA MARTINEZ 10281 EMPEROR LN NAPLES, FL 34114---3105 MELERO, ISABEL LOPEZ 10261 EMPEROR LANE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MEYER, PETER & BIBIANA 14523 MANCHESTER DR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 0918/09150 AJanyoaAa aigi}edwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z tewJof op aganbi}� 0918/09150 AjaAy gjinn aigi}edwos „8/5 Z x „ 1 azis iaqui �� LIVINGSTON, AUBREY L LONG, ROBERT H & LAUREL JUDITH D LIVINGSTON 14547 MANCHESTER DR 14587 MANCHESTER DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 LORCY, BERNITE LOUIMA, MANESE 10275 KINGDOM CT i0553 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 LOUIS, LUCRECE PIERRE LOUIS, ONELJN 10337 MAJESTIC CIR NATACHA M JN LOUIS NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 10453 MAJESTIC CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MAPEL, RONALD L & SUSAN MARCINCUK, NOREEN A 14563 MANCHESTER DRIVE 251 OCEAN REEF LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MARSAINVIL, YVENER & EDILIA MARTIN, ROBERT L & CATHY L 10389 MAJESTIC CIR 14566 MANCHESTER DR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MARTINEZ, MARGARITA MASSENAT, JEAN F 10417 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 10341 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MATOS, RICARDO GAMEZ MARIA E GAMEZ PELEGRIN 10521 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MEJIA, FRED CASTILLO EVELIA LARA ALVAREZ 10512 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MENDEZ, CARMEN HURTADO 10428 MAJESTIC CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MICHEL, JEAN VILET DAR LYNEJEAN LOUIS 10436 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MATTHES, MICHAEL F & MARILYN K 10411 GREENWAY RD NAPLES, FL 34114---3106 MEJIAS, RAUL A SUAREZ LILEIDA PINERO 10496 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 METELUS, MICHELOT ISLANDE RENETTE METELUS 10580 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 MO, CHUN KWONG KAMAN MO 6073 LAURELWOOD DR FORT MYERS, FL 33905---5705 STA PLESp� etiquette doeformat 25 mm/x'67 mm ccompatibleia e® very/ 051160/8160 Packet Pg. 370 ORTIZ, CHRISTIAN J RODRIGUEZ OWENS, MARK C PADRON, DENIS ANGELA RODRIGUEZ PAMELA BALL 10584 MAJESTIC CIR 10440 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 131 OCEAN REEF LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---8415 PAGEDAS, MICHAEL T PALMER, KEEN M & SHARON P PARASCANDO, ANTHONY P OLIVIA MUKOTA 151 OCEAN REEF LN JOAN A BRYANT 14507 MANCHESTER DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34114---8415 10381 GREENWAY RD NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3103 PARMAN, JANICE L PENA, YENNY PERALTA, DELMIRA A VIDAL ALICIA M PARMAN 10345 MAJESTIC CIR 10557 MAJESTIC CIR CATHERINE L PARMAN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 101 LIME KEY LN NAPLES, FL 34114---8419 STAKES® label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160 Packet Pg. 371 �tiguette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 0918/0915® Aaany oane algl}edwoo ww L9 x 11111199 }ewjo1 op egenbit� Mill 0% 0918/09158 IGany U3IM algl}edwoa „8/g Z x,, 1 azls lagel A es ^'�'I 9.A.7 MONDESIR, GARY MONTES ROMERO, ANTHONY DAVID MOORE, FANNIE M WILNA LOUIS ZULMARIE MORALES PEREZ SANDRA SUE EBERLE 10397 MAJESTIC CIR 10246 KINGDOM CT 111 GRASSY KEY LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3110 NAPLES, FL 34114---8403 MORALES, MIGUEL GOMEZ MORGAN, TONICIA DENISE NAPLES AW H0LDCO LLC ERIKA GOMEZ 10284 EMPEROR LN % ISTAR ASSET SERVICES INC 10433 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---3102 ATTN: TAX DEPT NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 180 GLASTONBURY BLVD # 201 GLASTONBURY, CT 03033---0000 NAPLES RESERVE HOMEOWNERS ASSN NASON, JEANNE T NAZIEN, QUEENIE WORTH % ISTAR ASSET SERVICES INC 220 OCEAN REEF LN 10577 MAJESTIC CIR ATTN: TAX DEPT NAPLES, FL 34114---8446 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 180 GLASTONBURY BLVD # 201 GLASTONBURY, CT 06033---0000 5D L NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SW FL LLC NEGRON, LUIS C NELSON, DAVID Q 5800 LAKEWD RNCH BLVD N 14542 MANCHESTER DR ISMAELLE FRANCOIS SARASOTA, FL 34240---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 10326 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---3123 M M ti r O NOEL, RICHEMOND NOONAN, DANIEL & KATHLEEN NORRIS, JERRY SCOTT O SIMONE CINE 26 OVERLOOK AVE SUZANNE NORRIS r o 10267 KINGDOM CT BURLINGTON, MA 01803---0000 186 MEADOW LANE N NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 CLYDE, OH 43410---0000 J d N D NORVILUS, ROCHEMOND OJISMA, EDAIN OLSON, RICHARD C & NEVA G a ELIANISE FORESTE MIRLANDE SAGESSE 195 OCEAN REEF LN 10247 KINGDOM CT 10329 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---8415 coo NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 v N iv 'L OLVERA, MELINA ORANTES, VANESSA OROZCO, JOSE M & MARIA H 10277 EMPEROR LN 10445 MAJESTIC CIR 10457 MAJESTIC CIR Q. NAPLES, FL 34114---3105 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 ORTIZ, CHRISTIAN J RODRIGUEZ OWENS, MARK C PADRON, DENIS ANGELA RODRIGUEZ PAMELA BALL 10584 MAJESTIC CIR 10440 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 131 OCEAN REEF LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---8415 PAGEDAS, MICHAEL T PALMER, KEEN M & SHARON P PARASCANDO, ANTHONY P OLIVIA MUKOTA 151 OCEAN REEF LN JOAN A BRYANT 14507 MANCHESTER DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34114---8415 10381 GREENWAY RD NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3103 PARMAN, JANICE L PENA, YENNY PERALTA, DELMIRA A VIDAL ALICIA M PARMAN 10345 MAJESTIC CIR 10557 MAJESTIC CIR CATHERINE L PARMAN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 101 LIME KEY LN NAPLES, FL 34114---8419 STAKES® label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160 Packet Pg. 371 �tiguette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 v vu ug 1.8/og l5® AJany aane olq lBawoo ww Lg x ww 9Z tewJof op attanbll� Og 1.8/Og l5® fuaAV g11M alq!ledwoo „8/9 Z x,, l ozis legel PEREZ, MARIA D PERIERA, SANDRA Y 10240 EMPEROR LN 10257 EMPEROR LN NAPLES, FL 34114---3102 NAPLES, FL 34114---3105 PERRIER, ROSE LAURE PERRY, JACK E & CYNTHIA B 10576 MAJESTIC CIR TIMOTHY=& JEANNE ARNOLD NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 PO BOX 115 WYNANTSKILL, NY 12198---0115 PIERRE, VILASON PLANTIN, JUNIOR & WILSIE ALIANE DATIS 10248 EMPEROR LN 10264 EMPEROR LN NAPLES, FL 34114---3102 NAPLES, FL 34114---3102 POJETA, KIM POULARD, JENNY A TROY OAKES JR 10393 MAJESTIC CIRCLE 14571 MANCHESTER DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 PREVILON, JONAS PRIETO, MIGUEL OCEGUERA 10287 KINGDOM CT DIANA R LOPEZ BERNAL NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 10365 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 PRUNIER, JUDE & JOCELYN RAMIREZ, WALTER CRUZ 10477 MAJESTIC CIR OMAIRA MONROY NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 10323 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---3128 REFLECTION LAKES AT NAPLES REFLECTION LAKES AT NAPLES MASTER ASSN INC MASTER ASSN INC % R&P PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 6310 CAPITAL DR # 130 265 AIRPORT RD S LAKEWOOD RANCH, FL 34202---0000 NAPLES, FL 34104---0000 RICO, MARTIN AVILA ROBERTS, TODD & LANA ALICIA ANAYA DE AVILA 6051 EL GATO LN 10324 MAJESTIC CIRCLE MERIDIAN, ID 83642---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 RODRIGUEZ, GUSY ROJO, VIRGINIA LOPEZ DE 10492 MAJESTIC CIR 10529 MAJESTI CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 ROSENDE, PETER & LUANN SAGESSE, MERASSAINT 14567 MANCHESTER DRIVE 10258 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3110 S�® label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 �APLE \.r etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 OISTJd PERO, ANDREA N 10311 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34114---3128 PIERRE, RONALD CHARLES FREDLINE PIERRE SAINTIL 10312 MAJESTIC CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 PLANTIN, MAXO ROSE M MANOLY 10272 EMPEROR LN NAPLES, FL 34114---3102 PRATT, FREDY C & BARBARA J 14487 MANCHESTER DR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 PRUDHOMME, EASLANDE 10569 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 REAMS, SANDRA KATHRYN 191 DEVON PLACE NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23606---1603 REYES, YURIDIA RAMIREZ 10484 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 ROBLES, IVAN A MEDINA DILMA BATISTA RODRIGUEZ 10561 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 ROLLE, JANET 10292 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---3129 SAINT CIR, EMALEINE 10432 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 Packet Pg. 372 v ru U9I.aio9 19CD AaaAV Dane egjEawoo ww G9 x ww SZ 1ewjoJ op aganb119 SFI NAPLES RESERVE LLC 10497 MAJESTIC CIR YADIRA MEDINA PENA % ISTAR ASSET SERVICES INC NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 0918/0915® fuaAv 431AA alq!}edwoo .9/9 Z x,, L ozis loge) 3� NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 180 GLASTONBURY BLVD # 201 GLASTONBURY, CT 06033---0000 SHUEY & WINNING JT REV TRUST SIDLICK, STEPHEN SIMLER, DELMAR LYNN & KAREN L 14752 WINDWARD LANE PO BOX 284 SAINT JEAN, MASSILLON SAINTUS, MARIE D SALOMON, IDOVY LAFAYETTE, IN 47909---3669 GUERLANDE SAINT JEAN FRANCOIS 10274 KINGDOM CT GUERDA MILIEN 10425 MAJESTIC CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34114---3110 10380 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 SAMPSON, KATHLEEN M SANCHEZ, GEILIS SANDRA J SIDA REVOCABLE TRUST GALE A MACAULAY OROSNELVIS RASPADO MORENO 14555 MANCHESTER DRIVE PO BOX 756 10285 EMPEROR LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 GREEN HARBOR, MA 02041---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3105 SANTOS, FERNANDO FUENTES SARDUY, JUAN E SCHUMANN, SCOTT L MIRLA M CORRAL CUE CARMEN E CABRERA MARYANN C SCHUMANN 10488 MAJESTIC CIR 10565 MAJESTIC CIR 103 MARSEILLE DR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 5D L SCHUTZENHOFFER, SUSANNE SCHWANTNER, MARK J & CELIA M SENDEJAS, JAVIER & MARIA M Q 9719 GREENRIDGE HEIGHTS RD 16829 CROSSHAVEN DR 10564 MAJESTIC CIR io FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS, IL 62208---0000 CHARLOTTE, NC 28278---8611 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 d SEVA, JUDITH SEVILA, WILLIAN OCHOA SFI NAPLES RESERVE LLC 10497 MAJESTIC CIR YADIRA MEDINA PENA % ISTAR ASSET SERVICES INC NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 10500 MAJESTIC CIR ATTN: TAX DEPT NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 180 GLASTONBURY BLVD # 201 GLASTONBURY, CT 06033---0000 SHUEY & WINNING JT REV TRUST SIDLICK, STEPHEN SIMLER, DELMAR LYNN & KAREN L 14752 WINDWARD LANE PO BOX 284 5000 S 100 E NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 GRAFTON, NY 12082---0284 LAFAYETTE, IN 47909---3669 SIMON EST, BRIGITTE R SINEUS, WILLY & DOMINIQUE SMITH, BETTY SUE % RHONDA MARTIN PR 10235 KINGDOM CT 205 S MADISON STREET 101 SUGARLOAF LN NAPLES, FL 34114---3117 DARLINGTON, IN 47940---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---8430 SMITH, DALE ALLAN SMITH, LYNDON G SMITH, ROBERTJ & VICKI L SUSAN CAMILLA SMITH CAROL M SMITH 14534 MANCHESTER DR 131 LIME KEY LN 717 45TH ST NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33407---2929 SOLIS, FLORIBERTO SOLIS, OSIRIS MEDINA SOLORIO, JUAN M MARTA ELENA DURAN PATINO MARIA L RAMOS ROUCO YESSICA SERRATO 10300 MAJESTIC CIR 10349 MAJESTIC CIR 10364 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 SORIANO, HUGO A ST VI L, CLAIRMIL STEARNS, ALLAN & ANN 10322 KINGDOM CT MIRLAINE ST ILIS 230 OCEAN REEF LN NAPLES, FL 34114---3123 10573 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---8446 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 STAPLES@ label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®516018160 Packet Pg. 373 etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 0918/0919® naanyoaJG v gledwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z Ljewiol anis l op a anbila S3�d� 0918/0919 rGany J�JIAA algilzduaoa „g/9 Z x,, 1 azls iagei 9.A.7 STEWARTJR, JOHN C & EMOLYN L SWAM, DONALD E SYNEGENTA SEEDS INC 887 MYRNA RD 140 SUGARLOAF LN VEGETABLES -NAFTA CAPE MAY, NJ 08204---4815 NAPLES, FL 34114---8429 PO BOX 500 SLATER, IA 50244---0500 SYNGENTA SEEDS INC TANNER, MELTEM 0 TASCA, JOHN & LORI A VEGETABLES NAFTA 950 REDWOOD SHORES PKWY 51 PEDDLER HILL RD PO BOX 500 PESCADERO APTS # N 204 MONROE, NY 10950---2029 SLATER, IA 50244---0500 REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065---0000 THERESIAS, JEAN C THIBAULT, GUY & MONIQUE THOMAS JR, RICHARD G & SUSAN A JOSEPH GUIMA 14558 MANCHESTER DRIVE 14579 MANCHESTER DRIVE 10270 KINGDOM CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3110 THOMAS, MARIE M THORNTON JR, FRED C & DEBBIE A TORRE, ROBERT V 10307 KINGDOM CT 180 LIME KEY LANE MAIRA M ZARCENO RAMOS NAPLES, FL 34114---3128 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 10381 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 TRAUTWEIN, PHILIP TREVINO, RAUL ULYSSE, WILBERTJEAN MARIE BETTY JANE TALLET JESSICA GARCIA LIDIA GUERRIR ULYSSE 241 OCEAN REEF LN #116 10525 MAJESTIC CIR 10408 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 VELLIS, JAMES P & BETTE S VIEITES, BLANCA L VILLAFUERTE, JOSE M GUERRERO 6 CABELL COURT 10262 KINGDOM CT SILVIA I CINTORA VILLAFUERTE MORRISTOWN, NJ 07960---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3110 10461 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 VILLARD, ANSCE & ANNETTE VIZCAYA, CECILIA AVILA VIZCAYA, ERASMO AVILA 10396 MAJESTIC CIR 10273 EMPEROR LN MIRTHA D ZAMARRIPA NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---3105 10589 MAJESTIC CIR NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 WALKER, LINDA W WALLING, KYLE M & KAYLA M WECKELMAN, JENNE LEIGH 190 OCEAN REEF LN #91 14538 MANCHESTER DR 241 LIME KEY LANE #136 NAPLES, FL 34114---8445 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 WHETSTONE, WAYNE H & BARBARA Y WIELAND, CHARLES N & DIANE ' WILLIAMCEAU, ELVITA 1570 S SUNDERLAND RD 10 ENGLISH WAY 10320 MAJESTIC CIRCLE SPENCERVILLE, OH 45887---9720 CAPE MAY CH, NJ 08210---1876 NAPLES, FL 34114---7753 WITCHELL, STEPHEN JAMES WOELFEL, EUGENE A WOOD, JAMES L & PAMELA H KELLIE MARIE NUARA KIM SEEFELD 171 OCEAN REEF LN 121 LIME KEY LANE W 1656 DREIER RD NAPLES, FL 34114---8415 NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 HILBERT, WI 54129---0000 STAPLESttiquette do format 25 mm/x 67 mm compatible e a e® very/®51060/8160 Packet Pg. 374 ■ "dV 0918/09150 nJaAVoane alglpedwoo Will L9 x ww 93 Iewaof op ettenbgl 0918/0915® Laany 411nn alglledwoo «g/9 Z x,, 1 ails lagel y TJ 9.A.7 YANCON, MICHAEL ALAN EMILY KATE MCDONAGH 14595 TOPSAIL DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 STAKESlabel size 1"x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160 Packet Pg. 375 etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 Easy Peel® Labels i • Bend along line to I AVER Use Avery® Template 51600 2 Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM 2 S 9.A.7 West Wind Estates Condo Association 301 Joseph Ln Naples, FL 34114 East Naples Civic Association Attn: Shirley Calhoun 11502 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34113 Naples Reserve Homeowner Association, Regal Acres Homeowners Association, Inc. Inc. 3232 W. Lake Mary Blvd. Ste. 1410 2180 West SR 434, Ste. 5000 Lake Mary, FL 32746 Longwood, FL 32779 Reflection Lakes at Naples Master Association, Inc. C/O Resort Management 2685 Horseshoe Dr S , 215 Naples, FL 34104 Etiquettes faciles a peler IRepliez a la hachure afin de ; ww�w.a Packet Pg. 376 c Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 51600 Sens deargement p -u reveler le rebord Po Mc ' 1-800-G - hp ) 4A I FRIDAY, MAY 18,2018 1 NAPLESDAILYNEWS 5 remain held in killing of Fort Myers man,, 32 Michael Braun 7t My... Nui sis USATODAY NETAORK - FLORIDA Five people wrested in the Sunday death of a Fort Myers man will remain behind bars for now. Lee County Judge Maria E. Gonzalez denied the suspects bail during their first appearance hearings Wednesday afternoo . The five — Tactuan Raidnel Brown, 27, Mario Joel Benitez, 22, Cheyenne Nicole Marron, 22, Edery Emmanuel Cardenas, 21, and R?ger Luderms, 21 — we accused of planning a robbery that led to the death of Daryl D. Scott at a home in the 300 block of Lorprise Avenue. The five suspects were arrested by Fort Myers police Tuesday. Scott, 32, was taken to Lee Memorial Hospital where he was pronounced dead. He was the fourth homicide vic- tim of the yew in the city. "We just want to say thank you to the Fort Myers Police Department," said Scott , s sister Latosha Scott. Scott's family was in the courtroom but declined to comment further. The five defendants we facing charges of second-degree murder, at- tempted second-degree murder, armed robbery and conspiracy to commit aimed robbery. Evidence disclosed by attorneys Wednesday include testimony from a co-defenclaort and from a surviving vici tim, Retail Smith, 23, who is acting as a witness for the state. Smith was am - tested Tuesday for an unrelated charge out of Collier County An attorney for one of the suspects argued the evidence was circumstantial and hinged on the testimony of another on! of the defendants. There's no admission by my client to his involvement," said Steven H. Whi ten, am attorney representing Luderials. Ludenas'flance6, Mikedled Faber, told thejudgehewas fromMidurnibut thathe Clockwise, from top left: Cardenas, Benitez, Marron, Brown and Luddemas. SPECIALTO FORT MYERS NEWS -PRESS had lived in Lee County for four yews. Faber said Luderas has worked at a bar for about four months. "Roger was not irdivolved'" she said af- ter Ludenes'lleparing. Faber said Ludenas'roommates were responsible for the crime. She said Lu- denas could not have done it because he was getting home when it happened , After the hearing a Fort Myers police detective asked Faber for contact infor- mation to try to verify Ludeneds'possible alibi. The remainder of the suspects were represented by a public defender. "In reviewing this narrative, there is very little physical evidence in this par- ficular case," public defender Sean Czarnomski said. "It is all pretty much circumstantial. ... It totally goes, not to - rally, but mostly on the confession of a co-defendant with little to no courit rating physical evidence' " Czarrimpondeaki said the guns were not recovered, and he said the surviving victim lacked credibility to testify against the defendants. He askedbailbe Sete HOMICIDE, Page SA NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by Habitat for Humanity of Collier County on: Monday, June 4, 2018 at 5:30 p.m. at First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples 14600 Tarniamir Trail E, Naples, FL 34114 Subject Property: The property is located on the west side of Greenway Road east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), and north of U.S. 41 consisting of a total of 59.90+/- acres. The applicant is petitioning Collier County to amend the Regal Acres Residential Planned Unit Development by changing the zoning classification of 23.15+/- acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to the Regal Acres RPUD, amending the master plan to include the additional land, increasing the permissible number of dwelling units from 184 to 300, revising the development standards, adding deviations, revising developer commitments; and by approval of an affordable housing density bonus agreement for the added 23.15 acres that will generate 46 bonus units for low or moderate income residents. [PL20170001733] WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner/ developer and Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail by July 5, 2018 to: James Sabo, AICP Collier County Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Email: James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov Phone: (239) 252-2708 Fax: (239) 252-6358 ROWAN BAYL JAMES Rocker Leather Rocker ,%W.'road, Recliner Recliner $498 $524 $799 ong. �sl corig. -999 "�Iean_ SAVE $100 SAVE $175 S F $200 POWER AND/OR airform," UPGRADES AVAILABLE ON ALL RECLINING STYLES ASK ABOUT OUR DESIGN SERVICES! L A tV, B 0 Y- FortMyers 4515 S Cleveland Ave ........................................ 239-275-9566 Naples 3770 Tamiami Trail N ........................................ 239-213-4276 A�- Also in. Tampa, Clearwater, Now Poll Richey, Brandon, Lakeland �Dsalnct old a, to Z-13by memo ando and swood. adi hurs cosearn plans cleartance, item special Am made proodon purs, purchm causary and same Nx Dimprount muct be combined our any otiner prompt offear a,cri Prom does not done dedeery ad Swnglml n be , V beed ad Mbl ii Pool R is depreartafi. of stick and sakirs, style and'ealon my way liy der, Oul may be linomr, Every prer is taken D produce ascurace detals amm in price ani miss my occur in built vk mi,rie r ert any I'drd' off"Ithele'que'sM.M0 "4/ 0 8 1 Or did, rom deal "Offer aciii, only to rim�k recero quaral purdiases No interest will be chled on prom purchase ad Iml montry pyrninis are required equal to dust crime purchros, amount di equally D, rFurrrbcff ol nuends in promo u mo is pro in fftr� vorment"wit Rile h rgdo F ni to tire W ighad ot lure deffs, and map be h is 9� dh jer ran tre minimum Taproot ill would be ,limit I - ass, was a non promptional prom Rl offund As apply 0 non-purni no strounts Punched, APR is 29� 9%; Minimum lintandar Chat is V card =holders puld we iner credl sard amement cor tiner spou aerm Subject a be it approval Any d ir callitil, marNmer debate or oter productional Ar applied 9 time out isledrace will reduce your I laudirds, andount and my adut in som mal caddying Me minimum qualifying purchase arropere required MEETING SUMMARY PROJECT: REGAL ACRES RPUD (PL20170001733) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING DATE OF MEETING: JUNE 4, 2018, 5:30 P.M. LOCATION: FIRST HAITIAN BAPTIST CHURCH OF NAPLES 14600 TAMIAMI TRAIL E, NAPLES, FL 34114 ATTENDEES: Sign -in Sheets are attached. The meeting began with an introduction of the applicant's representatives. Nick Kouloheras presented on behalf the developer/applicant, Habitat for Humanity of Collier County. Other representatives on behalf of the applicant were project planner Laura DeJohn, ecologist Laura M ti Herrero, engineer Jared Brown, and land use attorney Neale Montgomery. Collier County o Planner James Sabo was present and was recognized as the County staff planner for the project. The applicant representatives displayed a PowerPoint presentation, explaining that the request is J a rezoning of 23.15 acres of land from Rural Agricultural (A) to Regal Acres RPUD, allowing N for 116 additional dwelling units, or 5 units per acre. The request includes an affordable housing c density bonus agreement that generates 46 bonus units for low or moderate income residents. a Handouts were provided with the list of permitted uses in the existing Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district and the list of permitted uses proposed in the RPUD. Maps of the site location and surrounding neighborhoods were displayed. It was noted the A existing Regal Acres neighborhood of 184 homes was constructed around 2005 and many; communities have developed in the area since then. The proposed development standards, 2 density and open space are consistent with the patterns in the surrounding community.0. Site line diagrams were shown to indicate distance and views from Reflection Lakes (300' of m preserve between the existing and the proposed homes); Naples Reserve (400' of open space, lake and landscape buffer between the existing and the proposed homes); and West Wind Mobile E Home Park (ranging from 150' including preserve between the existing and proposed homes to 100' including landscape buffer between the existing homes and proposed recreation area). Q The proposed community design was described, and artists renderings were displayed. Explanations were provided for Growth Management Plan consistency, density rating system, suitability of physical characteristics of the land, and adequacy of transportation, access, drainage, sewer and water. The applicant representatives presented a "Frequently Asked Questions" session to address comments often raised when Habitat for Humanity projects are proposed. The floor was opened for audience questions and comments. None of the comments resulted in additional or new commitments by the developer other than to evaluate and reconvene with Naples Reserve residents about the potential for adding a wall facing Naples Reserve, and to look into methods to address speeding along Greenway Road. Refer to the full transcript of the meeting for the verbatim comments. In addition to the transcript, attached are two letters from property owners that were provided for the NIM. <end> Packet Pg. 378 Legal Acres Neighborhood Information Meeting June 4th, 2018 1 First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples j 5:30 PM Sign In Sheet Name Address 9.A.7 ll'lAj q-17ItF k) j &)z R al) n n qS94 P7+ >Toy 40� M /4 o. a 7 cr a fy\CtA CP) m Y pb` aC- ti e/ter cfft57,2W A-'59 a A ,e r A)af Packet Pg. 379 Regal Acres Neighborhood Information Meeting June 4th, 2018 1 First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples 5:30 PM]p Sign In Sheet Name Address W L, Kc� e-sto- Iva- ( U M M ti O ti r N Le Q-,? /<�ac zo 0 wo�Of j d N 2,600 a Sue, A- c� L R vl r— L/ 2 & "k, 1 � \ L Packet Pg. 380 Regal Acres Neighborhood Information Meeting June 4th, 2018 j First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples ; 5:30 PM Sign In Sheet Name Address 9.A.7 T/4 EM Al®rl ficonr&r\) I,UC-7 Mz�� /,� S 7c f 7 t av,�j 1 ?�? S6,6"0 -",a ep(P- L M M �J�L ti 0 0 0 r O N J d N 0 (L v v I co CU �I 3 m E (LtS(,-7 N4�JCM----5� bg1w, 1q7L-2 `JOTJOMAJGz T<5(k,q-) L Packet Pg. 381 Regal Acres Neighborhood information Meeting 9.A.7 June 4th, 2018 J First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples j 5:30 PM Sign In Sheet r - Name J, f17 e, - Address �7or Wr I '101ward'Llie- ,400 Cyt C itz 6f4 r /bii/ 0 0 0 1, rite- Z!VC,-79 /I/G f�� J' /^ ✓ �� v !� N d a to ee"�er, .2 'l J J 07/ J L--?ZA2 hl 1 C-` k�20� 1,42S Q 3 Y V f3 m M A I� n n 1 g5gl rt�a / V�I[J w, Cleo 14?g7 t Packet Pg. 382 Regal Acres Neighborhood information Meeting June 4th, 2018 j First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples [ 5:30 PM Sign In Sheet Name Address D47,— tQ1K(,0;2Q—) —R Q U�//v! A, -e- (A4' N _ \ L M A -fDOlt' M o 0 _ �r t L L, f �- L (4C -w t� 0 Lq ti N �- r'. � c- a v v <o N R �L CR G Q v m E t v f+ Q Packet Pg. 383 Regal Acres Neighborhood Information Meeting; June 4th, 2018 1 First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples 1 5:30 PM Sign In Sheet Name Address (A C_ C I .� C) � G S � � S � { L �� -e 5 7Z ✓ a� rr✓ nz M r � �cY\. r 0 0 O N d a v v c� N R �L CR G Q v m E M v f+ Q Packet Pg. 384 Regal Acres Neighborhood Information Meeting June 4th. 2018 ! First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples 1 5:30 PM Sign In Sheet Name Address j -,4 7�IZ VA Cn� "o I a M YJ ^ O O e O ti r O N J d N IL v v co N R �L CR G Q v m E t v f+ Q Packet Pg. 385 Regal Acres Neighborhood Information Meeting June 4th, 2018 1 First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples 1 5:30 PM Sign In Sheet Name Address Packet Pg. 386 q Regal Acres Neighborhood Information Meeting June 4th, 2018 j First Haitian Baptist Church of Naples 1 5:30 PM Sign In Sleet Name Address r Q Packet Pg. 387 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TRANSCRIPT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING FOR REGAL ACRES II JUNE 4, 2018 Appearances: LAURA DeJOHN NEALE MONTGOMERY JARED BROWN LAURA HERRERO LISA LEFKOW NICK KOULOHERAS JAMES SABO 1 Packet Pg. 388 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 MS. DeJOHN: It is 5:30. We want to do our best job to get you all the information we can on this neighborhood information meeting. And then get you the ability to go home and enjoy the rest of your evening. I'm Laura DeJohn. I'm a planner with Johnson Engineering here today on behalf of Habitat for Humanity of Collier County. I will give the opportunity real quick for anyone who is far back in the room, if you want to be able to see slides a little more clearly, now is the time to come forward just so you can have a better view. If you're comfortable where you are, that's fine, too. But I think it will be hard to see from that far back. Okay. For housekeeping purposes, there are restrooms right in the main entrance where you came in and signed in. I want to explain real quickly the reason why we're here tonight. We're having a neighborhood information meeting as required by Collier County. Again, Habitat for Humanity has submitted for a rezoning application and Collier County requires this meeting to be held, inviting all the neighbors, to talk about the uses that are proposed L :.i a a� d M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R- N N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E V 2 a Packet Pg. 389 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 within the new development and the physical design, the master plan of the new development, and this is our opportunity to explain the intentions of the project to you and your opportunity to give us feedback. Per the county requirements, this meeting is being recorded. It's also being videoed. There will be a transcript made of the meeting. So we do ask, when there are -- when there is the opportunity for questions at the end, we'll need you to speak into the microphones that are at the front of the room because of those requirements for a recording to be made and a transcript of the meeting. We do have representation from Collier County here tonight. James Sabo, which I can't see that far back in the room -- oh, there he is. James is with Collier County. He's the county planner reviewing this rezoning application, and he's available through the county for questions because all the application materials we have, including the transcripts from this meeting and the PowerPoint slides from this meeting will be available as public record. So to give some quick introductions, the L v a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R- N N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 390 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 applicant that's proposing the rezoning that we're here to discuss is Habitat for Humanity of Collier County. Habitat is a not-for-profit organization. Many of you might be familiar with Habitat for Humanity. Their mission is to give a hand up to people, not a handout. They help people find homes who deserve homes, working people. Also here tonight, who you will hear from, is our land use attorney from Pavese Law Firm, Neale Montgomery. And you'll hear from Engineer, Jared Brown, and ecologist Laura Herrero. Now this fine print is the official request that goes through the county process for rezoning. We have submitted the application for rezoning. There will be subsequent meetings after this neighborhood meeting. This is required before the item proceeds to the public hearing process of the Collier County Planning Commission and then the Board of County Commissioners. Those two meetings, the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners meetings have not been scheduled yet, but once we get through this neighborhood a Packet Pg. 391 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5 information meeting process, we expect those to be scheduled in the next few months. This request is a request to rezone 23 acres that's currently zoned agriculture. And the rezoning is from agriculture to residential planned unit development. This is additional lands in addition to the current Regal Acres neighborhood that exists along Greenway Road. The addition would, again, be 23 acres, and would have 116 housing units on it. There's currently 184 units at the existing Regal Acres subdivision and this addition of 23 acres would have 116 units on it. This request involves the county's bonus density program. The county incentivizes or encourages affordable housing by rewarding applicants to do affordable housing with additional densities and the additional density grant for this request would be 46 bonus units based on the formulas that the county provides in, again, encouraging affordable housing in the county. Hopefully, this isn't too hard to see from the back. This location diagram just shows you where exactly that 23 -acre addition is. It's accessed L v a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R- N N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 392 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 6 through the existing Regal Acres subdivision off of Greenway Road. We're showing you some -- a little bit of data about the surrounding properties surrounding the Regal Acres subdivision and the proposed 23 -acre addition. And what's interesting about the surrounding conditions is that the Regal Acres community, dating back to 2005, existed before many of the larger neighborhoods have come to this part of East Naples. When I reference additional larger neighborhood, Reflection Lakes to the west; Naples Reserve to the north; and, of course, the long-term buildout of Fiddler's Creek across U.S. 41, have all occurred subsequent to that 2005 time frame when Regal Acres was initiated and this second phase was always part of the plan as well. A little closer view. Hopefully, you can see what we're describing as the 23 -acre addition, is this wooded area labeled as parcel B on the map. And the existing Regal Acres is this area labeled parcel A on the map. Why we're here, this is the zoning map which shows you the conditions with the predominant type a Packet Pg. 393 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 7 of zoning in this area is residential planned unit development with Regal Acres subdivision being zoned residential planned unit development. Reflection Lakes, zoned residential planned unit development. Naples Reserve to the north is zoned the same. And this rezoning of the subject site would rezone from agriculture to a similar planned unit development. As part of the planning process, we look to be compatible with the neighborhood, so we look at the surrounding communities and things like the development standards and the densities in those communities. The standards proposed for the Regal Acres II community are consistent, within 10 to 20 percent range of difference, to the development standards that are in place in those surrounding communities of Reflection Lakes, Naples Reserve and West Winds. The density proposed is five units per acre, which is the same as the Regal Acres subdivision that exists today. And, again, within a very close range to the net densities of properties right around this proposed site. Open space is consistent with county standards a Packet Pg. 394 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 8 and consistent with the neighborhood with a large amount of open space dedicated on the site, 60 percent. Okay. We wanted to give perspective, since everyone who is mostly here is here because they live around the site. We wanted to give perspective on how the site plan is proposed and the distances between proposed houses at the Regal Acres project to houses that exist at Reflection Lakes or at Naples Reserve or at West Winds. Again, hopefully, you're able to see this. There's a 300 -foot distance between the proposed homes at Regal Acres and the existing homes, the closest existing homes at Reflection Lakes. 300 feet is about the distance of a football field. The proposed homes at Regal Acres will be 400 feet from the nearest home in Naples Reserve. Again, that would be the distance over a football field. And the nearest home to the West Winds mobile home park and units there would be 150 feet. The master plan that's shown on this slide, and, again, we do have larger blowups of these different diagrams in the back, the master plan shows the types of landscape buffers that are going L U a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J a N G D IL 0 m A 2 �L C� G CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 395 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 9 to go on along the sides of the properties, all the edges of this property will either be buffered with preserve or with a type B landscape buffer that's 15 feet wide, which is the county standard for having trees spaced with a hedge that is six feet tall and opaque, where you can't see through the hedge that's six feet tall. Again, this diagram is in the back of the room if you want to study it and you live right in one of these houses that's nearby in Reflection Lakes or Naples Reserve or in West Winds. This diagram shows you the true distance between the proposed houses at Regal Acres and the existing homes at those three communities that are adjacent to us, and it shows what's in between those distances, whether it's preserve, trees, landscape trees and buffers. Those are the two conditions that you would see from a backyard in any of those communities, and these diagrams show that. Now, the idea for this community has been a creative process. You know, Habitat for Humanity has, again, been around Collier County for a long time and they're always looking to raise the bar, so to speak, and do better and do more with their communities, and the development model for this a Packet Pg. 396 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 10 9A7 community in particular was taken from some award-winning communities in Florida. If you're familiar with Watercolor or Seaside in the panhandle, these communities are designed to be more neighborhood oriented, have a neighborhood feel, be walkable, not so auto oriented, but more oriented to be able to comfortably walk and bicycle in your own neighborhood. So it's a compact design. Again, that compact design accomplishes a few things. It makes the community more tight in nature on the land. It allows for a greater amount of control and maintenance of common areas when the houses are built in a compact way. And when the neighborhood is built compactly on the site, there's that room to create buffers and preserve areas to the perimeter of the site to have buffers to neighbors. So this is a good design, given the types of people who want to be able to live in a neighborhood condition like a community like this and to create those opportunities for buffering around the peripheries. So this layout is an artist rendering, but what we're trying to show you is, again, the consistency of how development patterns are in the L v a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R_ N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 397 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 area and how this proposed development lays out and those distances that separate proposed houses at the Regal Acres project from the houses at Reflection Lakes here. Again, that's that 300 -foot separation with preserve area. The separation here with a lake and 400 feet between Regal Acres and Naples Reserve. And the separation of the proposed houses at Regal Acres and West Winds with 150 feet here, mostly preserve, and then an area with recreation. Just another sense of how the community would look and feel. This is an artist rendering of the types of houses, the streetscape conditions, the planting types, the sidewalks that are proposed on both sides of the street and mainly the architecture. Again, Habitat kind of can have -- people can have preconceived notions about what a Habitat home is or what it looks like, and when you see a house that, you know, would be enjoyable to live in based on the way it's designed and the architecture and old Florida style like this, maybe you could, you know, change preconceived notions that you might have about Habitat homes. In order to get through the rezoning process, a Packet Pg. 398 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 12 9A7 the key criteria include making sure the project is consistent with the Growth Management Plan of Collier County. That's the foundational document that determines how the county grows over a 10, 20, 30 -year period. And this proposed project has been deemed consistent by a county staff with the Growth Management Plan. It lies within the urban mixed use, urban residential land use category, which is exactly what's being proposed, a residential neighborhood. The county, again, like I mentioned, kind of incentivizes or encourages the provision of affordable housing with affording housing density bonuses so that more units can be put onto properties. The county would allow up to 11 units per acre on this property, and the proposal is for five units per acre. MS. HERRERO: So just to kind of follow up on what Laura was saying, when we start a zoning application process, we always want to make sure that the development is being done consistent with the county's growth management processes and their land development codes, and this specifically a Packet Pg. 399 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 13 9A7 applies to the area that I work in, which is your ecological aspects of the project. So one of the first things that we do is we actually go out onto the property and we actually map the different types of vegetation, habitat and also look for any listed species utilization that may be on the site. What's really important to note about this site is because the area was predominantly agriculture around it for a long time, the site is not in pristine condition like you, you know, might expect of some areas. We have greater than 25 percent exotics over the majority of the site, about 21 out of the 23 acres. We did identify approximately six acres of wetlands on the property, which you kind of see. See the hatch pattern, diagonal. And through -- those are important because through the planning process, knowing what type of habitat there are, whether we have listed species utilization in those wetlands, we then try to plan, where is the best place for a preserve to be to meet the county standards. For this particular property, we have 25 percent of the property set aside for preserve. So L v a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J a N G D IL 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 400 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 14 9A7 that's just a little under six acres of the site. And one of the previous slides that Laura had shown, the preserve is actually located on the western side of the property, and as Laura mentioned afterwards, there are some larger blowups of the site plan in the back of the room. And that preserve was placed where it is because that is adjacent to the preserve for Reflection Lakes. So from an ecological value, a habitat value for wildlife, we wanted the largest preserve tract as possible, and having that in location, you know, it allows us to add on to the preserve that Reflection Lakes already has and that also allowed us to incorporate the maximum amount of wetlands that we could into that preserve. Through the county and the district, water management district permitting process and the Corps of Engineers, we have to minimize our wetland impacts to the extent possible. So that is one of the reasons why the preserve was placed where it was at. The other thing that we look at are management plans for listed species. As we go through the permitting process, not only with the county, but the state and federal, we have the plans reviewed a Packet Pg. 401 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 15 9A7 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. And what we try to do are what are the species that are out there and then what can we do to address co -existence of that particular species with the humans in the area to the extent possible. So in this area, we do know that there have been Florida black bear sightings. So we do have a Florida black bear management plan. Black bears wander into areas. We actually just had one reported in Fort Myers today near U.S. 41 and Colonial, right in the smack dab center of town. They tend not to stay, though, unless there's food available to them. So one of the things that the project is committed to doing, both Regal Acres phase one and the proposed phase, is having that education plan for its residents to let them know you need to keep your trash secured. It needs to not go out until right the morning before, you know, keeping bird feeders in, not keeping dog food out, things like that to void having that food source for the bears. So that's just one of the management plans. Again, that will be reviewed through all of those permitting processes and incorporated into the a Packet Pg. 402 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 9A7 approvals for the project. And then the other one that we have management plans for right now are wading birds, and that's really that anytime we have potential impacts to wetlands during the development, we want to make sure that we don't have any direct impacts to them during construction. With that, I'll turn it back over to Laura. Oh, I'm sorry, Jared. MR. BROWN: For those of you that have been here for more than a few years, you'll remember that not long ago the area in front of -- U.S. 41 in front of this project was only a two-lane highway, pardon me. The community planners saw that coming years in advance and in 2008 developed the U.S. 41 Developers Consortium. Habitat for Humanity was part of that, along with a number of other developers, and the intent was to provide funds to have improvements to the intersection of 951 and 41, as well as widen portions of 41 itself. At that time, Habitat paid their fees for all the units that were developed in Regal Acres I as well as prepaying for an additional 60 units that are part of this project. a Packet Pg. 403 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 As Laura said, the access to this project is through the existing Regal Acres community, so there would be no additional connections to Greenway, and we don't anticipate any significant impacts to the surrounding roadway network. Regal Acres existing is covered by an environmental resource permit issued by the South Florida Water Management District, and the intent is to incorporate this part of the development into that. The lakes will be interconnected and it will have a holistic interconnected water management system. The surface water discharge will remain unchanged location -wise to the Greenway Road swale. Since this project is in the Belle Meade study area, the discharge rate is severely limited. For this project, it's 24 CSM, and that is consistent with not only the Belle Meade study, but also the recently adopted Collier County discharge rate ordinance of 2016. And a final little note, for water management, anyway. Regal Acres is the only development on Greenway that actually discharges to the roadside swale in a controlled manner. Water and sewer. Prior to the development of a Packet Pg. 404 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 18 Regal Acres phase 1, water and sewer was not available on Greenway Road. At their cost, Habitat extended potable water and wastewater facilities all the way from 41 to their project about a mile. This allowed additional residents on Greenway to have potable service as well as fire protection. The new infrastructure will be just tied into this and there should be no degradation of service to the rest of the community. In addition, Collier County has requested and Habitat has granted or will grant a utility easement on this phase 2 property for their future well field expansion that will end up providing water service to the entire region. MS. MONTGOMERY: Gee. For the record -- is this on? Can you hear me? Laura, come on up here, if you would. My name is Neale Montgomery. I'm an attorney. And what I'd like to do is ask some of the questions I think -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: We can't hear you. MS. MONTGOMERY: It's not working? MS. DeJOHN: Just stand here. MS. MONTGOMERY: What I'd like to do is ask some of the questions I think you might have to try Packet Pg. 405 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 19 to facilitate the question -and -answer session. One of the questions I think that residents often have is most of my personal wealth is invested in my house and I'm worried what's going to happen to my property values. And so I'd like to know if you can address what they can anticipate relative to impact on property values. MR. KOULOHERAS: Good evening, everyone. Just for the record, my name is Nick Kouloheras and I'm the president of Habitat for Humanity of Collier County. To answer that question about property values, because that's one that's brought up to us pretty often. On a national level, if you read any number of studies, you'll see that actually affordable housing within any community really does not bring it down. However, that situation in southwest Florida is even -- is to a greater magnitude because of the makeup of how we live down here. The majority of neighborhoods down here in southwest Florida are gated communities that are kind of self-contained little nodes. And so when you look at property values from a property Packet Pg. 406 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 9A7 appraiser's standpoint, they do not compare one neighborhood typically with another. You know, for someone that lives in Naples Reserve, for example, in Naples Reserve, there are a number of amenity packages within that community, just like Reflection Lakes, and a Habitat for Humanity community does not have that detailed of amenity package. On top of that, homes, let's say, in Naples Reserve, might be 2,800 to 3,200 square feet. Habitat for Humanity homes are typically somewhere in the 1,300, 1,200 to 1,500 -square foot range. So you can't really compare apples to apples. And so when they do a market analysis and comparison by property appraiser, they don't really use -- they don't cross them. So a few more points, though, to that question. Number one, what Habitat for Humanity has done in the past, really about the past three or four years, we did realize that as we built in -fill lot sites, if we were to build a home and the cost to build that home is $70,000, and the house right next to it was a for -rate market neighborhood, market house that went for $300,000, that there was a Packet Pg. 407 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 21 9A7 that ability to potentially bring down that property value next door. So what we do now with every single one of our homes is we go out and hire a third -party, independent appraiser. They will go and give us a market value of that home and then we will sell that house at market value. Now, the next logical question is, well, wait a minute. Market value and affordability don't always go hand in hand. What we will do is because, typically, our costs are less than market value, we will sell it at a market value, and then that difference between actual cost and affordability and the market rate of that home that it was sold for will be covered by a silent second mortgage. And, really, what that's there to do is to prevent predatory lenders from coming in and telling people within our communities, hey, you've immediately grasped equity in your home, please refinance it at some rate, and then, you know, potentially lose your home because they can't afford that type of interest rate. The other thing it does as well is it really helps prevent anyone that goes through the really a Packet Pg. 408 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 22 9A7 detailed vetting process within a Habitat community from actually sneaking through and trying to take advantage of doing a quick flip on their home. We hold the mortgages, so we hold all those restrictions. MS. MONTGOMERY: Okay. So you've given us a lot of information. But the short answer is, is this going to have a negative impact on the property values? MR. KOULOHERAS: No, it will not. MS. MONTGOMERY: Okay. I heard you talk about financing and market rate. And some folks have the idea that this is free and people that get stuff for free don't take care of it. Can you answer how someone would acquire a Habitat home? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes. So a Habitat applicant -- just so you know, last year alone, we received just under 2,000 inquiries for housing. We built about 110 homes last year Collier County -wide. So, you know, the vetting process is extremely detailed. So our typical Habitat or any Habitat family would go through not only criminal and background checks, they would be visited and personally Packet Pg. 409 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 23 9A7 interviewed by a number of staff members and volunteers before that application eventually goes to our full board of directors for final review and approval. Now, once the family actually is approved for a home, the family has to come out to the job site if they're able to work on the job site, if not, we'll find other work for them to do, and work 500 hours of what we call sweat equity. So they will invest that time into building their home and their neighbor's home. And then the last kind of element of that is, like you said, Neale, most folks think that this is just a handout. Actually, every family that goes through the Habitat program has a mortgage with Habitat for Humanity. And that mortgage is paid off over, typically, between 20 to 30 years, depending on a number of different indicators. But they, every single month, have to physically walk into our office, whether it's here or up in our Immokalee office or North Naples office location, and hand us a mortgage payment. And in that mortgage payment is their escrows for their taxes, their property insurance, their HOA fees and obviously the mortgage payment itself. L v a a� as M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R- N N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 410 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 24 9A7 And then Habitat for Humanity then uses that money and puts it right back into our program services to do -- to build more housing down the road. MS. MONTGOMERY: I heard you say HOA fees. Homeowners associations usually monitor the maintenance and look of the community. Is there anything different here or is it like everybody else's HOA? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, so Habitat for Humanity, just a little background, we've been in Collier County now for 40 years, and the benefit of being around town for that long is we've been able to see mistakes that have been made in the past and we've been able to try to take corrective measures to address those mistakes that we feel we've made going forward. So one of those mistakes was within HOAs and the maintenance within those HOAs. And so what we have now decided to do, this is roughly three years or so ago, starting with our first neighborhood up in North Naples called Legacy Lakes, which is off Woodcrest Drive, not only common area maintenance, but all the front yard maintenance is done by a third -party landscaping firm. It is part of their Packet Pg. 411 1 1 HOA dues. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 9A7 It is managed now by a professional property management company and that professional property moment company, along with a number of Habitat staff members that have been deployed to help police it, will now go and monitor the maintenance of our communities. On top of that, we've learned a lot from our HOA rules and regulations over the years, what's worked and what hasn't. And so our new HOA rules and regulations are unbelievably restrictive in what's allowed. And the problem with Habitat of years ago was that an HOA is a requirement by the State of Florida, and -- but it's only as good, as you folks know, as the people that are policing it within the HOA, whether that's your management company, whether that's your board of directors or just other residents. And so we've done a much better job of not only firming up those HOA documents, bringing in a third -party property management company that manages the property along with a third -party landscaping firm that's responsible for the maintenance, and on top of that we've started to L v a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R_ N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 412 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 9A7 educate our board of directors through a program and a leadership program to get them more apt to learning how to manage their own HOA. Last thing I will say on that, sorry for being long-winded, is that we've also recruited, and we encourage anyone, to help volunteer with it. So our Legacy Lakes project, which is up off of Immokalee Road, as I said, has a volunteer that goes out there three days a week. And that's another community liaison that walks the property, looks for any types of violations, gets to know the neighbors, gets to explain rules and regulations as he is walking around the neighborhood. So it's just another outreach program that we've tried to do in order to learn from some of our mistakes in the past. MS. MONTGOMERY: I know a lot of you live in gated communities, which usually means security is an issue for you. Nick, I heard you say that you vet your future prospective residents. So is security something that you look into before you work with someone in providing them a home? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, certainly. So part of that application process is Habitat families need a Packet Pg. 413 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 to go through an extensive criminal background check. That is anyone that is on the application that plans on residing in the home, as well as any future homeowner. You know, if someone is waiting for a family member to come over or someone, you know, down the road they have a baby and that -- we're not going to do a criminal check, obviously, on the baby, but all those same rules and regulations that apply within our deed restrictions apply to any person that lives within the home. So if there is a person with -- inside the confines of the home that is convicted of a felony, that is -- has the -- Habitat has the right to foreclose on that property. So there's a number of those restrictions that are written into Habitat mortgages that are not written into your typical mortgage through your typical bank. For better, for worse, there have been some bad apples in the barrel over the 40 years we've done this. We've had to exercise that right. Only about two or three times, but the good news is those documents, each time we've exercised it, actually it held up in the courts and we were able L v a a� as M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J a N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 414 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 28 to remove those families. MS. MONTGOMERY: I know that illegal immigration is an issue we hear a lot in the news, and some people are (indiscernible). Will there be illegal immigrants in this housing project? MR. KOULOHERAS: No. So another part of that vetting process is all Habitat family members or anyone that's on the application will go through an immigration screening. So everyone within a Habitat home has to either be a U.S. citizen or a legal resident of the United States, working towards their citizenship. MS. MONTGOMERY: We saw the site plan and it's kind of hard to see, but do you plan to have any walls or fences around the community or will you rely on the vegetative landscaping? MR. KOULOHERAS: That's a good question. We've had some of these conversations with some of our neighbors already. And what I'll say to that right now, as -- what is presented here tonight are the Collier County code requirements for what is required between adjoining property owners, depending on the use between property owners. So if this was a commercial site, for example, a Packet Pg. 415 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 there would be a totally different landscaping buffer package that would be required versus a residential -to -residential site. Habitat for Humanity right now is actively researching and looking into cost associated and maintenance numbers with walls and fences and, unfortunately, right now, I don't have all those details. So those are conversations that we can certainly have as we continue this conversation after tonight with some of our HOAs out there, that are out here tonight. But I will say this. My initial estimates that I've come up with so far for walls that we've talked about run to the tune of about $600,00. So when we talk about affordability and long-term maintenance cost, we have to keep those types of things in mind as well. So this site right here, I know it said 116. The site design that we currently have laid out is 115. So you guys are -- you guys can do the math. It's $600,000 for 115 homes. You know, we're adding significant cost to the house as well. So those considerations are taken pretty seriously, but we are looking into those numbers and seeing if there's anything we can do to L v a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R_ N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E V 2 a Packet Pg. 416 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 30 9A7 continue the conversations we've already started to have, I know, with Naples Reserve, with West Winds and Reflection Lakes. MS. MONTGOMERY: I want to ask you one last question. Statistically, they indicate that kids who grow up in a home do better in school and -- because they have a more stable environment. Is that what Habitat Collier County statistics show? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, of course. You know, it doesn't take a college professor to understand what safe, stable home ownership does for everybody in the family. Picture your child and you're moving every year or every other year or a couple times a year, constantly searching for the next place to live, constantly searching for the next place to feel safe and secure. And so we see and we've done studies, actually, with the Collier County School District, and we took student grades two years pre -moving into a Habitat home and two years post living in a Habitat home. And what we found was, I believe it was 16 percent increase in that time frame in Packet Pg. 417 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 31 9A7 reading scores and -- I'm sorry, 18 percent in reading? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: 16 in reading and 8 in math. MR. KOULOHERAS: Oh, 16 in reading and 8 percent in math. So, I mean, as you guys all know, we've all been through some level of schooling, and it's a nice feeling being able to come home to a home every day, sit down in your room where you feel safe and secure and know that you can study without worries of other activities that might have happened in or around where you previously lived. And, on top of that, establishing those roots within that community as a network to help feed off one another and to help one another out. MS. MONTGOMERY: Thank you. I want to ask Laura Herrero a question. Laura mentioned that the site had 25 percent exotics. Sometimes people go, what's an exotic? MS. HERRERO: Oh, sorry. You know, we get used to -- we know what we mean. The exotic vegetation. There's a lot of melaleuca, things like Australian pine, Brazilian pepper. Those are the ones that -- ear -leaf acacia is another one, those are the ones that are a Packet Pg. 418 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 32 9A7 prevalent here. The Brazilian pepper makes a real dense understory, makes it difficult to walk through. And per Collier County codes, those are actually to be removed. Those -- the preserve area that will remain, all of the exotics will be removed from that preserve as well. MS. MONTGOMERY: So it will be healthier preserve, healthier vegetation? MS. HERRERO: Absolutely. MS. MONTGOMERY: Okay. Thank you. I have a question for Laura DeJohn. You mentioned several times that Collier County incentivizes affording housing. A lot of folks may be wondering why. MS. DeJOHN: Well, there's two reasons why. One is because, by Florida statute, every local government must accommodate and address how people of all income levels and backgrounds can live in the community. So it's a statutory requirement, number one, to have plans in place and programs in place to ensure that any level of the community gets served within the community with a safe and decent place to live. Packet Pg. 419 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 33 9A7 Secondarily, then, Collier County's Growth Management Plan that is that foundation for how the community will grow has a housing element. And the housing element is what enforces and implements those statutory requirements for providing safe, decent and affordable housing in every community. And the Collier County housing element is crafted with certain provisions and solutions for how to provide that housing within the community. Some of those solutions include working with non -profits that are in the community on the provision of affordable housing and creating the opportunity for the balancing of those economics by allowing the higher density -- higher densities on land. The more development that can occur on the land, the more affordable it is for the end user. That -- again, that density incentive or the ability to increase density goes up to 16 units per acre in Collier County. Habitat's pattern to kind of blend in the community and be more single-family style housing, Habitat's pattern has been at the five -unit per acre level. MS. MONTGOMERY: Thank you. I need your help now. I know you all have questions. Collier County wants a good record of the proceedings. L v a a� d M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R_ N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E V 2 a Packet Pg. 420 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 34 9A7 So I want you to come up and ask questions, but I want us to respect everyone who speaks so we can get a good record of what you say and not talk over people because we want Collier County to know exactly what each one of you has to say. So if you would, those who have questions, we have two mikes here. You can come up and the appropriate person on the team will respond. MR. KLUUG: William Kluug (phonetic). 92 -- MS. MONTGOMERY: I forgot. You have to (indiscernible) you have to put your name on the record so we know who you are. I forgot. MR. KLUUG: Okay. The children that would reside in this proposed development would -- (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Neale, you can restate the question for everybody else. MS. MONTGOMERY: No. That goes to the (indiscernible). I'll repeat your question. So his question is, the children that live in the community -- MR. KLUUG: Would attend school where? MS. MONTGOMERY: Would attend school where? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Yep. So the question was a Packet Pg. 421 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 35 9A7 where would the children within this community attend school. Right now, if they choose the public school option they would go to Manatee, more than likely, Manatee Middle, Manatee Elementary, then Lely High School. MR. KLUUG: Fine. With respect to this proposed development, has there been any discussion with the school district regarding the impact on enrollment? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes. That's a great question. So the question was, with the development of this community, has there been a discussion with the school district as far as impacting enrollment. So to answer your question, the answer is yes. The way the Collier County planning process works is any community, with a residential planned community, as this one, has -- goes to Collier County School District for their review as well. They have a seat at the table, if you will. So they know what's coming down the road and how to plan. This community that's proposed, if approved, the soonest we would be building in here is Packet Pg. 422 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 36 9A7 probably three years from now. And so when we sit down, we take it to the next level than a lot of developers. We'll sit down with actually Collier County schools, and because we do have -- we know we have a lot of children that live within our neighborhood, we will sit down with them as we get closer to that and we will give them estimated projections of not only students' ages, but also what grades they would be coming into, depending on their closing schedule. So that way they're able to -- the school is able to accommodate the needs. And then, you know, they did it a lot back in the early 2000 range, you know, the last-ditch effort the school goes to is building future sites. And to be perfectly honest, speaking to my colleagues, if you will, the folks I know over at the school district, growth in Collier County is really three areas. It's in Golden Gate Estates. It's out Immokalee Road. And it's down the East Trail. And so the school district is well aware of that and is already planning on future school sites that will go down there. I'm not sure when they would build them, but -- MR. KLUUG: Have you had discussion with this a Packet Pg. 423 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 37 proposed development in conjunction with the ARGO (phonetic) residential development that's going to take place directly across from (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: We can't hear (indiscernible) . UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: We want to hear all people speaking. MR. KOULOHERAS: Okay. Well, thank you, sir. And what the problem was is that this mike has to go to a recording device, and for some reason, it's not picking up the (indiscernible) mike. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MR. KOULOHERAS: So we'll get that taken care of. MR. KLUUG: The question is, has there been any discussion with the school district relating to this proposed development in conjunction with the ARGO residential development (indiscernible) opposite the school (indiscernible) Manatee (indiscernible) affordable housing development and what the impact of all these children is going to be on the enrollment level at both the elementary and middle schools, particularly when you take into account its (indiscernible) utilization capacity is L U a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R- N N G D a 0 m A 2 �L C� G CL m c m E V 2 a Packet Pg. 424 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 38 at those schools, understand (indiscernible) additional children coming to these schools, has that been taken into consideration? MR. KOULOHERAS: So to answer your question specifically about conversations between Habitat for Humanity and ARGOS Development, no, Habitat for Humanity has not talked to ARGOS about their development patterns and what their proposals are. However, just like Habitat for Humanity, their development would have to go through all the same processes that this development has to go through. So when the school district looks at district lines and district areas, they are well aware in advance of what those development patterns are going to look like. MR. KLUUG: Well, I beg to differ. I'm not so sure that -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, there's a gentleman from Collier County staff here. Maybe he could help us answer that question. MR. SABO: James Sabo, Collier County. What the school district does is anticipates growth in the school system. And if there is growth, then they accommodate that growth however they feel they need to. a Packet Pg. 425 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 39 9A7 Collier County government, the Board of County Commissioners, doesn't really directly have control over the school. They're a separate entity. MR. KLUUG: Okay. (Indiscernible) between Manatee (indiscernible) development and now this. The capacity at the schools, kids present (indiscernible) school (indiscernible) is going to be far exceeded. I'm not so sure that particular issue has (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, ma'am. MS. MONTGOMERY: You have to come and speak into the microphone. Come on up. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. We'll give you the microphone that goes into the big speakers because I believe that one, as well, is just tied into the auto recording. MS. MONTGOMERY: (Indiscernible) for the record now so we can hear. MS. YOUNG: Oh, okay. Thank you. My name is Pat Young. I'm a resident of Collier County and I'm very interested in the Collier County schools. This sort of piggybacks on what the gentleman was just asking. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MS. YOUNG: Okay. Packet Pg. 426 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 40 9A7 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes, the one in your hand is the one that's (indiscernible). MS. YOUNG: Okay. Can you hear me now? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yes. MS. YOUNG: Okay. School question. A little different than the one before mine. Right now -- you had not mentioned the requirement, income requirements for people purchasing a home in Habitat. I know that there are some requirements in that regard. But right now, and we're talking about Manatee School, because that is the school that would suit this area right now, right now, Manatee School has over -- close to 95 percent economically disadvantaged students. And what you said earlier about the improvement in a student's work when they get a stable family home is, yes, incredibly important. But also all the newest studies are showing that not having an economically mixed and diverse student body also affects a student's work in the school. So I don't know what the income levels are that you require for your program, but right now, we need to take a look at what the school looks Packet Pg. 427 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 41 9A7 like and how Habitat's community would also affect it in that way. Definitely, we need more room. Maybe another school. There are already about six temporary classrooms in the parking lot over there. So I would hope that Habitat will address the issue of trying to create some kind of economic diversity. I mean, all the kids are wonderful no matter what their financial levels are. The teachers are great, but putting all these kinds in the same school has been shown to be detrimental to improvement, and we want to stop the cycle of poverty any way we can and that would be one of the ways to do that. So I do hope that somehow this discussion comes up. And it's not just at Manatee School. It's in many different places throughout East Naples because of the number of affordable housing units that we have. They're not spread equally throughout the county, which I think would be the ideal. And let me think if there was anything else that I wanted to say about that. No, I guess that's pretty much it. I would hope that that's going to be a consideration. For Packet Pg. 428 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 42 9A7 the last 20 years, all the studies are showing this and we have not made a lot of progress. Now I remember what I wanted to say. It's not -- the school populations of this type where they're economically disadvantaged are in 90 percent are all here in -- most of them are here in East Naples. I shouldn't say all of them. So we are creating a situation here which is unique and it's good that we have all these houses for people. I appreciate that. I, myself, grew up in a very impoverished area. I know what it's like. And so I hope that this is going to be addressed. Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. Thank you for your comments. And just -- you know, I'm a firm believer as well that the more racially and economically diverse any school could be or any community could be, the better that school, the better that community would fare well. I did have some -- ran some statistics that may address some of that. And we ran these statistics from 2012. The reason I picked 2012 is because we can make the argument that that's when a Packet Pg. 429 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 43 9A7 everyone was officially saying we came out of the recess, although most people didn't see that probably till 2015, but 2012 is what they say, until our most recent statistical year, which was obviously last year, 2017. In East Naples, 4,121 single family and multi -family building permits were pulled in that time frame. Of those 4,121 building permits pulled, Habitat for Humanity of Collier County in East Naples pulled 160. That is .035 percent. So when we look at communities and the amount of growth that's happening within this community, I'm hoping that statistic alone will show that those numbers might start to sway a little bit in the other direction. So the other thing to just touch on schools as well is Collier County impact fees, you know, we all know them, we all know we have to pay them. The Collier County impact fee on the fee schedule, from every fee that we've ever paid, is the highest of all the different fees. And so whether you live in Naples Reserve, Reflection Lakes, West Winds, Habitat, you pay the Collier County school impact fee and that's to help offset the cost of those future developments. a Packet Pg. 430 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 44 9A7 Now, there's a deferral program in Collier County, so Habitat does have some of its impact fees waived, but not all of them. But thank you. It was a good point. Thank you for you -- MS. LEFKOW: Nick, I'd like to -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Oh, sure. MS. LEFKOW: Can I just say one thing? MR. KOULOHERAS: Of course. Come up to here. MS. LEFKOW: Sorry. Lisa Lefkow. I'm the CEO of Habitat. And I want to just respond to the education levels. I had the privilege of attending Lely's high school graduation ceremonies last week where nearly a third of the scholarship and high honors recipients were Habitat families, including the one graduate from Lely that has been accepted at West Point. So I think that -- I would hope that that gives you a great deal of confidence that what happens inside Habitat homes is that families become actively engaged in their student's education. The education level rises and we have students that excel. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: You have another Packet Pg. 431 1 1 question? 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 45 9A7 DR. CONFUSIONE: Yes. Hi. My name is Dr. Michael Confusione. I live in Naples Reserve. And I find it wonderful that Habitat has been around for so long and that you've learned from some of your mistakes. However, in your presentation, you kind of micro spoked in on the mistakes that Habitat made within its own community area within Habitat for Humanity housing. From what I understand, the one mistake that you haven't looked at that I think has been written about several times is the saturation, not in Collier County, but the saturation in East Naples, specifically, that we are off balance, so to speak. And I think you need to address the saturation point at this meeting and what's going to happen when you're doubling the size of an already existing Habitat development, one. Two, the impact of leaving the area -- I think the county planning has to address the fact that this is a junction for Marco Island. Putting another 150 homes in the junction of 41 and Collier -- Collier Boulevard can be very damaging if we have fires, if we have whatever that's a a Packet Pg. 432 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 46 9A7 catastrophe, hurricane, like last year. There were traffic jams. How would I ever get to 75 if another 150, perhaps 300 cars on the road, because every family has two cars. If we take the average of every family having two children, we now have the need for 30 new classrooms on the 150 times two, 300 children in the classroom. At 30 kids per classroom, that's ten new classrooms. I see that as a wash in terms of all the tax money that the county might get from this development. And, number four, if you look up definition of preserve in Webster's Dictionary, it says not being destroyed. Now, we were told, and maybe this is just a criticism of -- because I come from Brooklyn. And we adhere to Webster's Dictionary. However, maybe your language in southwest Florida is different. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). DR. CONFUSIONE: Okay. So if you're going to use the term "preserve," as it was, I have an issue with iStar (phonetic) and my homeowners and Naples Reserve have an issue, when they tell us this is all preserve, we think that strip of land is a Packet Pg. 433 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 47 preserve and couldn't be touched because it means not for destruction. Now, here I hear an awful lot about the preserve border or preserve meaning a border that you're going to leave. That's not a preserve. It can be taken down anytime. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Actually, it can't (indiscernible) . DR. CONFUSIONE: It can't be built on, but it can be taken down anytime, no? Okay. Well, I think it would be better to use buffer when we're referring to land that you're going to develop, because it seems a little deceptive that this was presented to -- from Naples Reserve to Reflection Lakes and from the information that I got when I went into the clubhouse of Naples Reserve that this was preserve. That's not your issue. I just think, for future reference, if you're going to correct your errors, so to speak, as you presented very well, but like I said, not addressing saturation, that the word "preserve" is -- has different meanings, and it should be clear what that meaning is. MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, thank you. Thank you -- Packet Pg. 434 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 48 MS. MONTGOMERY: Hang on. Let me just -- one, let me address traffic. We have to do a traffic impact statement in accordance with the county rules. So that will, in fact, be done. Two, Fair Housing Act, you can't discriminate against affordable housing and you can't -- it's allowed to be anywhere within the county and goes back to what my question to Laura DeJohn was, the county has an obligation to incentivize affordable housing. Preserves. Preserves are -- I'm from outside Philadelphia, so I know what its common meaning is, but when it comes to land use, you have to look at the land use regulations as those terms were defined. Buffers are specifically defined one way. Preserves another. We'll be consistent with those codes. Do we have any other questions? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Thank you. I'm a retired educator from Broward County schools on the east coast of Florida. I escaped that coast in 2004 to come over here. I have family down on Marco Island. I'm very, very glad that I did escape and I Packet Pg. 435 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 49 just want to mention about, from an educational standpoint, I was a high school guidance counselor in the City of Coral Springs. Now, just as a frame of reference here for all of you in terms of what we're dealing with here. I spent 33 years living in Broward County. I watched Broward County develop into a nightmare. The City of Coral Springs started out as a Westinghouse community in the early 170s. It grew and grew. In the beginning, it was a lovely community. I went first from Fort Lauderdale High School, where I started teaching in Broward. Two years there. Within about seven years after I left, I went to Coral Springs. Fort Lauderdale High School had deteriorated. And believe me, we had a nice, wonderful diversity in that school, a lot of students from Las Olas Boulevard. Las Olas in Fort Lauderdale was considered quite an affluent area also. So I went to Coral Springs. I was transferred to Coral Springs. I lived in Pompano Beach at Lighthouse Point for most of those years. Coral Springs, as I said, started out as a Packet Pg. 436 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 50 9A7 Westinghouse community. It was going to be all solar homes. It was going to be the answer to Florida. And I started at Coral Springs High School. I spent six years there and then I was sent over to J.P. Taravella High School in the south end of Coral Springs. And, by the way, I was not far from Parkland. Knew Parkland extremely well. Saw that community get developed. It's still considered a fairly nice community over on the east coast. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes, I will, but I have a right to speak. So what I want you all to understand is that what you're dealing with here in terms of education and also in terms of overpopulation. It needs to stop, because what you're going to get here within the next eight to ten years, and it's already happening, is another Broward County. So my question here, and I favor -- I think what Habitat for Humanity does is an incredible job. I certainly welcome you, but when is this going to stop? You're part of it. I wish Donna Fiala was here. I met Donna a Packet Pg. 437 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 51 9A7 Fiala. MR. KOULOHERAS: She -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: She's right here. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Oh. Hi. I met you down in Coral Springs some years ago and also at Reflection Lakes. And you have been the answer to our prayers here. I'm very disturbed about seeing the growth here. Where I'm going to escape next, I have no idea. But I really feel, again, as a retired educator, this is not good. It's not good for any communities. It's not good to blow this population off to the extent that you have in Miami Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties and the schools over there have deteriorated, and believe me, it's out of control. So what are you going to do to really curb what needs to be curbed here. Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. So, you know, it's an excellent question, and the only thing -- I guess the only thing I can really say about it is there's growth patterns within Collier County. There's a growth management plan within Collier County. And those growth patterns are dictated by not only market demand, Packet Pg. 438 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 52 9A7 but also by government regulations on where growth can happen. The area of East Trial, if you will, from 951 out to, essentially, the Everglades, the Fakahatchee Strand, I believe is the first one there that you come to, is part of an area called the rural fringe mixed use district. There is roughly, and please don't quote me on this number, but over the next 15 to 20 years, they're saying there's roughly about 20,000 more homesites coming to this area of town. And, once again, please don't quote me on that number. I can tell you right now, with the current land holdings that Habitat for Humanity has at its current zoning, we make up 346 of those. So, now, ten years from now, will we be back here, five years from now, to have another neighborhood information meeting to see if we can increase density within the community? I'm going to tell you probably yes. All right. But as it sits right now on our books, that's what we have. So we talked about growth. We talked about growth patterns. Collier County has an estimated build -out L v a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R_ N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 439 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 53 9A7 population of a million people. Currently, right now, there's 360 or so thousand full-time residents in Collier County. So what are we going to do about it? Well, we're going to try to do smart planning, working with the county, work with county officials, work with neighbors to make sure we develop communities that are the best communities that we can develop. You know, I wish some other builders were in here because I would ask the same question of Neal Communities. I'd ask the same question of iStar. I'd ask the same question of D.R. Horton. I'd ask the same question of all of them because it's not just Habitat that is building homes. As you heard me say earlier, from 2012 to 2017, 4,124 building permits pulled in East Naples. Habitat pulled 160 of those. So, statistically, we're -- my favorite word, almost de minimis when it comes to that population growth. So I know I didn't give you -- I might not have given you a great answer, but just telling you, someone that's been in the land development business here in Collier County for 15 years, I'm just telling you what's -- what's coming down the L v a a� as M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R_ N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 440 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 54 9A7 road and what Habitat's role is or what's Habitat impact overall for those communities. MS. MONTGOMERY: Well, let me have a follow-up question to that. Is Habitat inviting people to move here from Broward and other counties or is Habitat trying to meet a need that already exists in the community? MR. KOULOHERAS: So that's actually an excellent question. So Habitat for Humanity of Collier County has a policy that in order to even apply for a Habitat home you either have to have lived in Collier County for a minimum of one year or you have to have a vested interest in Collier County. Vested interest meaning you might only be able to afford to live in Lehigh Acres, but you are a nurse at NCH and you commute every single day and you commute primarily because you can't afford to live within the Collier County border. So you have to have either that vested interest or lived here for a minimum of 12 months. You cannot just come over, have a residency of whatever, you know, street in Miami Dade and apply for a home over here in Collier County. We won't even accept the application. a Packet Pg. 441 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 55 9A7 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Do we have any other questions? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I have two. I think this is -- okay. All right. I got it. I have two questions, basically. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: In looking at the street that goes in off of Greenway, there are about 26 homes, I think, 27. MR. KOULOHERAS: On Greenway Road? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: No. On -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Oh, Majestic Circle? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Majestic Circle. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So, again, somebody was talking about traffic. Somebody said the traffic plan hasn't been done yet. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. Because now you're talking about the same 300 cars, 7 percent of which are all going to try to leave between 7 and 8:00 in the morning on a two-lane street. MR. KOULOHERAS: I know you said I have two questions. Let me answer the first one first, if I could. Packet Pg. 442 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 56 9A7 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, that's one question. MR. KOULOHERAS: Okay. So as Neale said here, our development has to do a traffic impact statement. And actually -- is that officially done yet, Jared? MR. BROWN: It's in the process. MR. KOULOHERAS: It's in the process of being wrapped up. So they use FDOT standards on what is allowed, what's not allowed, what's a failing road, what's a passing road. And so any improvements that would need to be made to Greenway Road or even -- I mean, you can't just take that one road segment. When we -- when they do this traffic impact statement, it looks at traffic flows on 41. It looks at traffic flows all the way down, really, to the 41/951 intersection. And so right now the traffic engineers are telling us that there is no significant road impact as far as timing delays and all those things. I will agree with you, most people go to work between 7 and 8:30, and if there's 100 more homes there, then there's going to be 100 more cars. That's not -- I would never try to argue that, but Packet Pg. 443 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 57 what they're saying within these -- within these detailed analysis of the levels of service will tell us what that impact to the roads are. Initially, the onset is that it doesn't have a significant impact. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I understand. I'm more worried about the impact to your community. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. So we've had, actually, a public meeting with our community as well, because they have their concerns as well. They say, hey, what are you going to do about cars that drive in and out of our neighborhood, are you going to put in speed bumps. So they have their concerns as well and we met with them last week and we're addressing some of their concerns, too. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) develop (indiscernible) . MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, so that's a very good point. When -- I believe Laura mentioned earlier, when we purchased the land that Regal 1 sits on, not too long after, we purchased about half of the land that the proposed Regal II sits on. So all of those initial studies from water/sewer service availability to road impacts a Packet Pg. 444 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 58 were all kind of considered at that point in time. That's why you heard, I believe, Jared say, our project engineer, that Habitat for Humanity, at that particular moment in time, prepaid traffic impact fees. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. The second question is for ecology. You have -- you have (indiscernible) wading birds up there, but what about the deer? Are you going to plant a lot of schefflera back there so they will eat yours and not mine? There's like 10 to 12 deer back there. There's a 12 -point buck back there. MS. HERRERO: Oh, is there? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Absolutely. They're over on our property eating our schefflera and our hibiscus and everything else. MS. HERRERO: You know, we will address, through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Collier County codes, whatever management plans we need to do. We just kind of listed two of them up there that we know would be needed for sure during the development process. The deer are not a listed species. They're not a protected species. So, generally, we don't have management plans for them. You know, they try a Packet Pg. 445 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 59 to control the populations with different hunting and things. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Oh, so we can get a hunting permit for them? MS. HERRERO: Maybe not in your backyard. Maybe not in your backyard, but -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, that's where he is. MS. HERRERO: Yeah. Sorry. MR. PARKHURST: I'm (indiscernible) Parkhurst (phonetic), Naples Reserve. I was just talking to this nice lady here. We're talking about parcel B. And when you initially showed this, you had single-family units up there, correct, on the -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, on the new proposed site. MR. PARKHURST: Right. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, sir. MR. PARKHURST: But I'm reading down through here. It says that also includes two-family duplex units, attached dwellings, including townhouses and also multiple family dwelling units. I'm confused. MR. KOULOHERAS: So, I mean, maybe it's a question for Laura to answer, but -- Packet Pg. 446 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 60 9A7 MS. DeJOHN: What you're reading from is the handout that was at the front desk and I want to make sure anyone who didn't get a chance to get it, there's a list of the permitted uses within the Regal Acres proposed development and a list of permitted uses within the current exiting agriculture zoning district so you can have information and basis for understanding of what the agricultural uses are that are currently allowed on the property and what the proposed uses are per the Regal Acres planned unit development proposal. That is a standard list of residential uses that falls within the residential planned unit development parameters. It's standard, basically, for every community out there. There's a list of multi -family units in Reflection Lakes, for example. And what Habitat has proposed and is deciding in going forward with permitting on is the single-family model, but it's -- MR. PARKHURST: Do we have your word these are going to be single-family units? MS. DeJOHN: That would be Nick's word if -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Sir, I will say this. There's nothing of an indicator that we would a Packet Pg. 447 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 61 9A7 change that. We've actually already started to design plans. The way the renderings came was not a cropped photo. Those renderings came directly from architectural plans that we've started to work on. What changes a lot of the stuff for any developer, just to let you know, is really the -- when it comes to affordability. So we talk about things like adding a $600,000 wall. Okay. Well, if that adds $6,000, roughly, let's say, to every home, is that still affordable? And, in which case, well, maybe the answer is really we need 120 homes, you know. So we're not asking for that, but that's how developers, you know, make their numbers work. Right now, everything that we have laid out, everything we have on our website, everything we've discussed, Lisa and myself, with family services, has all been a single-family, detached, two-story home. MR. PARKHURST: There's nothing in black and white that says this is what they're going to be. You may end up putting multi -family townhouses in there? MR. KOULOHERAS: I never want to say never, a Packet Pg. 448 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 62 9A7 but I'm going to tell you right now the likelihood of that happening is almost zero. MR. PARKHURST: There's no way that you can put black and white in here that these will be single-family homes. MS. LEFKOW: So what we're asking for is -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Go ahead. I'm sorry. I need you to come up, though, so everyone can hear you. MS. LEFKOW: So what we're asking for is the change in the zoning. So the zoning overlay, the zoning that Laura just spoke about is the RPUD. So that's the description here. We're talking about a project that's not going to be built for three years. So there's a lot that is -- (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MS. LEFKOW: Look, friends, I'm going to tell you right now, I can't tell you what's going to happen in three years. You don't know what's going to happen in your neighborhood in three years, but I can tell you there's no sense in us going as far as we have gone to project and to propose this neighborhood, we've made significant investment here, if this was not our end game. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) a Packet Pg. 449 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 63 9A7 all of our (indiscernible). MS. LEFKOW: It is our -- it is our absolute desire and this is the direction that we believe will be both the best for our families as well as for the surrounding neighborhoods, too. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MS. LEFKOW: We've heard your -- we've heard your request to build a wall. Absolutely. You've heard Nick tell you that we are -- (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MS. LEFKOW: Friends, in order for us to have a transcript of this meeting, we can't all talk at once. So we have heard your concern about a wall. We are working to develop the cost and the model for that. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: We don't want a wall. We don't want it built at all. MS. LEFKOW: So I hear that as well. And that breaks my heart. I'm sorry that you feel that way. But, friends, we're not -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: You're breaking our hearts, too. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MS. LEFKOW: We're here to -- Packet Pg. 450 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 64 9A7 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) our wallets. MR. KOULOHERAS: Folks, let us remind you, if you have a question or you have something to say, it is imperative that you come up and speak up here. I'm not going to allow yelling back and forth. Okay? I think we're all adults here and we're all civilized. If you'd like something to say, please come up and that way also we have a formal record on it down the road in case I did promise something or there are concerns from the neighbors that we try to adjust or try to accommodate. MR. RAKESTRAW: Thank you. My name is Russ Rakestraw (phonetic). I live in Reflection Lakes. And I just -- I don't -- I don't really have any specific questions, but I want to share some information with you. First of all, statistics. We've heard all kinds of wonderful statistics tonight how this development's going to be the greatest thing since canned beer. A fellow told me many years ago, try to convince a family member of a person that's just been killed in an airplane crash that air travel is Packet Pg. 451 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 65 9A7 the safest form of transportation. Statistics mean nothing. And they don't mean a whole lot to the people. Look at what's going on in Marco Island. There's statistic out that the wazoo that says they don't need another ambulance. Well, they're on the verge of getting one because they want one and they don't give a rat's behind about the statistics. What I'm telling you is that these people here tonight, you all put on a pretty slick presentation, but it ain't -- nobody's buying it. Well, I can't speak for everybody, but most people's not buying it. And that's what you need to understand. This fight is not over. You guys can be smug and, you know, come all dressed up and put on your presentation. That's fine. But we're going to fight as long as we can to keep this from happening. You tell the people that live on Manchester now that have people from Habit (sic) -- teenagers from Habit from Humanity jump the fence and come through that yard, their yard, going where? There's no place for them to go. So what's up with that? Packet Pg. 452 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 66 9A7 Those are the people you're talking to, and I think you need to know that. I believe you're sincere. As a rule, I think Habitat for Humanity's a good program. I don't think it's a good program for our neighborhood. Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. MR. KIRSCHOFF: My name is Steve Kirschoff (phonetic). I just relocated down to Florida recently. We're also in the Naples Reserve. And what -- I'm not familiar with Habitat for Humanity, because where I came from, I'm not aware of the work. So I'll just say this because the -- my -- I think probably a common perception would be affordable housing -- I guess here's what I'm going to ask. You mentioned earlier you're not going -- you can't discriminate. You have to build the housing in the county. I understand that. The question is, what's the saturation level? How much of that is already here? We're not talking about just the new development. We're talking about what already exists compared to the other areas. I mean, I have -- none of us, I don't think, Packet Pg. 453 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 67 are against affordable housing. The question is, are you clustering it all in one area and -- or too much of it in one area, we'll say? The other question I have, because I am not familiar with the statistics, is what is the impact to the crime rate, not only in the existing community, but in the surrounding communities when Habitats are expanded or created? Because I'm not aware of it and I would like to know. MR. KOULOHERAS: Sure. So to answer your question about criminal activity. I don't believe we have anyone from the Sheriff's Department here tonight. But I will say this. Criminal activity, if you were to go even to Collier County Sheriff's Department website, they have a map that you can zoom into, and it shows you the calls and what they were within different communities. So you can zoom into Reflection Lakes, Naples Reserve, Habitat for Humanity, Fiddler's Creek, wherever you want to go. And I will say this. The calls, the way I read it, I'm not a sheriff, so there's no significant impact in criminal rates when it comes to a Habitat community. We had a public information meeting about two years ago. Some of a Packet Pg. 454 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 68 you might have even been there, where two members from the Sheriff's Department actually came in unsolicited and made that same statement. So do I have the police report with me right now? No, sir, I do not, but I can tell you from what I've heard from our colleagues or our friends in the Sheriff's Department that, you know, tell us anything that we need to be made aware of, they will not, the best to my knowledge, at least they haven't in the past, said that because a Habitat neighborhood has come into a community that crime rates and statistics have gone up. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) that we have (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: That's good. So, also, within every one of our communities, we've designated a home for a member of law enforcement, and that's really our way of helping out with the community. Law enforcement members, along with teachers, nurses, the whole likes, they all struggle very much so to find housing that's affordable in Collier County. And so even though our charter, if you will, doesn't allow us to help out folks making more than 80 percent of the area median income, and just so a Packet Pg. 455 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 69 you know, the area median income right now is $75,000, our board did allow us to put essentially a rental home inside every one of our communities for a member of law enforcement to just help them, you know, be able to save and move on and still live in the county where they work. As far as oversaturation is concerned, the county has 1,000 different statistics, if you will, to say -- you know, they go by commissioner's district maps, they go by regional planning maps, and I know we just heard that statistics don't mean much. So all I can tell you is that when it comes to Habitat for Humanity, we have, in East Naples, if you will, and I use East Naples, what I mean by that is not Commissioner Fiala's voting district, I go by the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District or the foundation district as kind of the generic version of East Naples, pretty much from Bayshore East, Marco Island north of the highway, for the most part. Habitat for Humanity, in its 40 years, has roughly built, I believe the number in East Naples is about 1,000 homes. I don't know how many homes are in East Naples, but I can tell you the number L v a a� d M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J a N c D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E V 2 a Packet Pg. 456 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 70 is probably upwards of 30, 40 or 50,000 homes. So if there is a saturation issue within East Naples, I don't believe anyone here could sit there and make the argument that Habitat built 1,000 of -- let's say the number is even 20,000 homes -- that that constitutes oversaturation. So there may be oversaturation. There may be homes that are deemed affordable price points and stuff like that, but that issue has not been caused by Habitat for Humanity's efforts. In fact, all we've really helped do is you got to remember the folks, years ago, it was farmworkers that needed housing. You drive out to Legacy Lakes off Woodcrest Drive off Immokalee Road, I encourage you all to do that, that's our latest community, our last resident moved in about 18 months ago. First house on the right, that person is a banker. Third house down on right, that person works for the school district. Fourth house down on the left, they work for Collier County government. So these are the folks that live and work amongst us. These are the folks that work at your clubhouses. These might even be, you know, some of a Packet Pg. 457 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 71 your golf course superintendents. And so I just want to put a face on that as well that, you know -- like I said, I'm from Massachusetts, I'm from Boston, and I'm from specifically a town called Lowell, Massachusetts. It's a mill town. And I remember what Section 8 housing up there looked like. And Section 8 housing, compared to what Habitat for Humanity does, two totally different beasts, totally different beasts. Now, like I said, we're talking about people -- when you go into Bank of America and see your banker, you don't think, oh, they need affordable housing to live here in Collier County. At least I didn't when I moved down here. So just one other little point. The median sales point for a home in Collier County is roughly $380,000. Do we have any realtors in the room that could confirm that? If you use that kind of general rule of three, right, 30 percent, that means you have to make six figures to afford a house in Collier County. I don't know where all of you are from, but six figures where I'm from was a damn good salary, and it's a damn good salary down here. a Packet Pg. 458 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 72 So the issue is only growing and Habitat for Humanity does not address that other income bracket. And I truly wish someone did. When we go talk to developers, I hope they did -- the county has a housing plan. Some of it's good. Some of it's not so good. But those are the incentives that we need to help create to help developers try to get into this market, because I'll tell you what's going to happen. I'm sorry I'm going off subject here. But I'll tell you what's going to happen if there are no incentives for developers. Nothing. And then the only thing they can look at is market price -- lot prices, and say they'll continue to build housing where it's most economically viable for them, which depends on where you live right now, there's some decent lot prices in East Naples. So we have to help work with each other to help create these incentives to bring folks in so we can build in North Naples. We're actually looking at property right now in North Naples. Our last project we built was in North Naples. I said earlier 160 permits Habitat pulled from 2012 to 2017 in East Naples. We pulled -- where's L U a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J a N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 459 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 73 my map -- 284 outside of East Naples in the past five years. So I'm not saying everything we build is not going to be in East Naples. You'll never hear me say that, but I just want to tell you guys where kind of these things are going. There was a woman over here. Thank you. MS. WALKER: My name is Linda Walker, and I live over in West Wind. I bought my home in 2002 and retired in 2006 to come down here and live. When I bought my place, I knew that I would live to see it not be in the country any longer, but when I looked at the fact that this was an agricultural, I forget the term, zoned area, I thought, okay, they'll be building houses in some of these places, but down the Greenway, no. I'll live to see it not be country any longer. I figured it would take 20, 25 years. Within ten years, Reflections Lake came into being. So you all are off my charts. Fiddler's Creek came into being. You all are off my charts. It's just like everybody wants to shut the gate behind themselves. And we're sitting here in a church, and my heart was sitting back there breaking to hear people not wanting other people to a Packet Pg. 460 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 74 have a chance to live in this beautiful place. And I'm just really sorry to have to say that I don't think you all are right. They need to have places for people who work here to live here. I know some of the people who live in Regal Acres. Oh, wonderful people. They're good neighbors. And I just can't see how hard hearted what I'm hearing here tonight. It breaks my heart. MS. PENTON: Hi. My name is Kathy Penton (phonetic). I'm a resident at Naples Reserve. I have a couple of questions. First off, I'd like to refer to this affordable housing meeting on May 7 here in Collier County. And one of the items of topics was new Habitat project going in near Greenway across from Fiddler's with 1,000 units. Can you comment on that, care to? MR. KOULOHERAS: Can you tell me where that's coming from, ma'am? MS. PENTON: It's coming from -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Because -- MS. PENTON: Collier County's Affordable Housing Advisory Committee. MR. KOULOHERAS: Okay. Well, I will tell you right now, Habitat for Humanity doesn't have Packet Pg. 461 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 75 anything out there for 1,000 units. Habitat for Humanity owns no raw land on the southern side of U.S. 41. I believe what that's referencing is that potential Manatee site that was put out to request for information to see what developers would be interested in coming in and building some type of affordable housing. But from the best of my knowledge, and maybe Commissioner Fiala could ask -- if she knows something -- more update than I do, I'm sure she knows a lot more than I do, but the county hasn't made a determination on what's going to happen with that land. They have not put it out -- MS. PENTON: With what land? I thought you didn't own any. You said -- MR. KOULOHERAS: No, no, the Manatee land site. MS. PENTON: Oh, the Manatee. MR. KOULOHERAS: So I believe that's -- MS. PENTON: (Indiscernible) Greenway. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. No. Greenway Road, absolutely. I'll tell you what we own on Greenway Road. I mean, it's public record. We own this section of Regal II. And then if Packet Pg. 462 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 76 you go up Greenway Road and take a right on Fritchey Road and you go out a mile east on Fritchey Road, it dead ends into acreage that Habitat for Humanity owns out there. And that's -- MS. PENTON: And how much is that acreage that you own there? MR. KOULOHERAS: At its current zoning that we could -- to answer your question specifically, it's 93 acres. At its current zoning, Habitat for Humanity could build one unit per five acres on that land. So the quick math is roughly 18 units. Now, I'm going to tell you right now, that's not the best use of the land. So Habitat for Humanity, sometime down the road, three, five, seven years, might come in and ask for a zoning change, but 1,000 units, I don't know of a single property in all of Collier County that has that type of density. MS. PENTON: That's why I'm questioning it. MR. KOULOHERAS: That would be 11 units an acre. MS. PENTON: Get an education, people. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, it certainly isn't us. MS. PENTON: Okay. Now, in addition -- I have several questions. I'm sorry. a Packet Pg. 463 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 77 MR. KOULOHERAS: That's okay. MS. PENTON: You stated that we -- you own 346 acres right now of Habitat property. MR. KOULOHERAS: No. It's roughly 346 approved units. MS. PENTON: Oh, units. Okay. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes. MS. PENTON: Because are you familiar with the study that was done by Dr. Porto (phonetic) who claims that there's 150 acres of undeveloped property that could potentially add 2,000 additional housing units here in East Naples? MR. KOULOHERAS: From Habitat for Humanity? MS. PENTON: From Habitat. MR. KOULOHERAS: Okay. So I will tell you exactly our landholdings in the East Naples area. You have this project right here, which is 23 proposed acres, undeveloped, raw land. You have the 93 acres I just talked about, and then there's one other parcel that Habitat owns that is 84 acres, which is out closer to the Links of Naples, which is a little bit further east on the East Trail out by 6L Farms. MS. PENTON: And you're planning to put all Habitat housing in these communities, which is the Packet Pg. 464 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 78 41 Trail, correct? So we talk about saturation. I just want the people to know the potential of what exists for all of us going towards Alligator Alley. We'll soon be calling it Habitat Alley. MR. KOULOHERAS: Ma'am, I -- usually, I'm pretty good at just letting people talk, but where I'm going to 100 percent disagree with you, what is your definition of oversaturation? Because I just told you -- MS. PENTON: Over -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Hold on a second. I just told you Habitat for Humanity, how many acres we own and how many approved units we own compared to the 20 or so thousand future units that have come down the East Trail. So if we make up even 1,000 of those, that's oversaturation? MS. PENTON: I'm not an expert, and I don't claim to be an expert. MR. KOULOHERAS: Okay. Well, I'm just wondering because you're telling me it's oversaturated. I want to understand your -- MS. PENTON: I'm basing my statements on studies, feasible studies that have been done and presented, okay, by the Affordable Housing Packet Pg. 465 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 79 Committee here in Naples. Dr. Porto submitted it to the committee. It's in the minutes of the meeting, okay. And I just feel that if we're discussing things, we should discuss the amount of property Habitat owns, in all fairness, letting everybody know what exists out on the corridor, not wanting Habitat Alley as a name for East Naples. I also wanted to point out that District 1, which is the district that we live in, has 30 percent -- 32 percent of -- their properties are appraised at 175,000 and under. I just wanted to throw that out there, because people wanted to know. Now, also, in the reading, I went in and I wanted to see what the assets of Habitat was, and on your Facebook page you have a thing there that your assets are currently, for 2017, were $90,000. You show that you have $10,000 worth of land assets. Could you explain that to me? MR. KOULOHERAS: You're saying -- so I'm sorry. The numbers don't match up, but -- MS. PENTON: I need a clarification. I couldn't understand it. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. So if you're on our Packet Pg. 466 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 80 web page and you're looking at our posted financial reports, our financial audited reports that we have to have done every year -- MS. PENTON: They're (indiscernible). They're colored (indiscernible). I just wanted to touch on that. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes. Habitat for Humanity currently has, in the form of assets, roughly $90 million. Now, the majority of that is made up of mortgages. So those are mortgages we currently hold from previous Habitat homes. Our land assets right now are currently valued, I believe, within that same document, of somewhere in the neighborhood of about $18 million, but that is all of our landholdings in all of Collier County. We do own stuff -- we own stuff out in Golden Gate Estates. We own stuff up in Immokalee. We own stuff up in North Naples. We own stuff in Golden Gate City. We are working currently on a home in the City of Naples proper. So that cumulative number is not just an East Naples specific. It is Collier County as a whole organization. Packet Pg. 467 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 81 MS. PENTON: Also, from what I understand of what I was reading, that these housing -- affordable housing programs are to make a profit for 15 years. Are you turning a profit out of Regal Acres currently? MR. KOULOHERAS: Turning a profit for 15 years? MS. PENTON: In order to be classified as affordable housing, you have to turn a profit for 15 years. MR. KOULOHERAS: No, no. MS. PENTON: Nothing? MR. KOULOHERAS: So affordable housing that -- well, I think where the 15 years is coming from is that whether it's Habitat for Humanity or any other organization that does housing and deals with housing grants, whether it's through local, state or federal dollars, typically, there is a -- yes, thank you, a deed restriction put on the property for 15 years, which means if it is sold or title transferred within that 15 -year time period, and it received one of these grants, that it has to go towards -- the house has to be sold to another qualified affordable housing homeowner. Packet Pg. 468 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 82 MS. PENTON: Okay. There was one other thing here I had. You have low income, as you classified. How many are no income? How many turn into becoming no income? MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, I mean, if someone loses a job at some point in time, I'm not going to say that never happens. I think a lot of people lost their jobs during -- from 2008 to 2012. That being said, you have to generate -- you have to pay a mortgage with Habitat. So you have to generate an income. If you were to ask me, what is your standard Habitat family, on average, right, your (indiscernible) average Habitat for Humanity family is mom, dad, two kids, collective gross income, probably in the neighborhood of 34 to $40,000, okay. If those families stop paying their mortgage, Habitat forecloses on that family. MS. PENTON: And what is your percentage of foreclosure? MR. KOULOHERAS: Our foreclosure rate over the history of our organization is less than 1 percent. MS. PENTON: And how much is in Regal Acres? Packet Pg. 469 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 83 MR. KOULOHERAS: I don't believe we foreclosed on anyone in Regal Acres. MS. PENTON: Do you know or you don't? MR. KOULOHERAS: No, we haven't. I mean, and our delinquency -- MS. PENTON: You know, I don't want semantics. I want answers. That's why I'm asking the question. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Well, I mean, I'll tell you, I put our statistics up against any bank. And I can tell you right now there is 30 percent -- 30 days or later, you're considered delinquent, whether you're a Habitat family or whether you're a Bank of America customer. Our current delinquency rate, and Lisa, correct me if I'm wrong, the last number I remember looking at was 1.8 percent. So these families, even the highest our delinquency rate got in the height of the recession, 2009 to 2013, the highest our delinquency rate, and once again, please correct me if I'm wrong, Lisa, because you'll know these stats better than I do, was less than 8 percent. MS. PENTON: Okay. Thank you very much. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. Packet Pg. 470 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 84 MS. MONTGOMERY: The young lady in the pink shirt has been waiting longer than anybody (indiscernible) let her go. MR. KOULOHERAS: We've got someone over here, too. Yeah. MS. PAJETTA: Thank you. I'm Kim Pajetta (phonetic). And where -- she left. These letters are for Commissioner Fiala. I have a question for you about -- I know Habitat and affordable housing are -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Get closer to the microphone. MS. PAJETTA: -- two different things at times, but when you all look at where you're going to build, do you look at affordable housing per district? Do you look at how it's distributed, you know, all around Collier County before you pick, this is the place to build? Because we're -- bankers, for instance, work all over Collier. And county employees work all over Collier. So the work is distributed. MR. KOULOHERAS: Uh-huh. MS. PAJETTA: Do you guys look at that? MR. KOULOHERAS: So to answer, probably nobody's going to believe me when I say this, but Packet Pg. 471 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 85 we actually -- we do. So if you ask me my professional opinion, my opinion for Habitat for Humanity, the way I would like to build every Habitat community, a pocket community here, a pocket community here, here, here, here, because it does exactly what you just said. But here is, you know, the reality of the situation as well, though. Remember, it is housing that is affordable and it's at an affordable price point for an income spectrum. So when we have Collier County impact fees, the last one I just signed a check for was $27,000 for a Habitat house. When we have approval cost to get a community through the process of roughly 10 to $15,000 per home, and you take those type of numbers and stack pile them, then you have to sit there and try to be the most strategic and the best negotiator you can be to pick up these parcels of land throughout Collier County. So like I said, I cannot tell you specifically where we're looking, but right now we're looking, actively looking at three parcels north of 75, because that's Lisa and I's direction that we've given our staff and that we've told our board, is a Packet Pg. 472 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 86 that we're going to do everything we can to try to diversify what Habitat's impact is. So we are actively looking at that, but as kind of the land development numbers guy, if you will, you know, I'm looking at if the numbers work, and I have to consider all those factors. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So a lot of it is land (indiscernible) . MR. KOULOHERAS: It's a huge value, yeah. Just like any other developer, it is -- a lot of it is land value, yes. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Sometimes I think maybe that's why this certain area is more saturated (indiscernible). I'm not sure of the right words. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Well, and that's where those -- those housing elements that -- those incentives that we talked about, not just for Habitat for Humanity, for any -- I'll pick on D.R. Horton, for example, just a name out of the hat. D.R. Horton has a product they call their express model. They build it in Lehigh Acres for $165,000. They build it in Collier, they're proposing to hopefully build it around $300,000. My last conversations with the folks at D.R. Horton a Packet Pg. 473 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 87 is if they could be in that market, they would absolutely be in that market in Collier County, because there's such a use demand for it. The problem is D.R. Horton can't make the numbers work that well because high, high land value, obviously, in land cost, and then those other governmental fees which, on average, nationally, make up about 25 percent of the sales price of a home. So, at the end of the day -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) the end of the day (indiscernible) maybe at higher cost of land but (indiscernible) is equally important. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Maybe they don't -- you know, when somebody is commuting for 45 minutes to get to where they work in North Naples (indiscernible) . MR. KOULOHERAS: You're 100 percent right. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) it is important. MR. KOULOHERAS: 100 percent right, because there's the value that's that cost associated with commuting. I agree with you 100 percent. Packet Pg. 474 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 88 UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, ma'am. MS. ACEVEDO: Hi. My name is Brenda Acevedo (phonetic). I've been here in this room for an hour and I'm a bit confused, and I'm glad I didn't bring my children that would be able to understand all this language, because I thought I was coming to get information about these wonderful houses. I work five days a week, and I -- I mean, I work very hard, and I cannot afford a house that would cost me half a million. So I came here to get information about these wonderful houses. And I feel rejected already just hearing how you don't want these houses built here. It's like what criteria do I have to stand so that I could be, like, wanted in your neighborhood. And overall being here, like I just feel like I'm in the wrong spot. Like am I the only one here that's to get information that's -- I mean, that's for these houses or -- and it's sad, and like I said, I'll repeat myself, I'm glad I didn't bring all my children, because I wouldn't want them to hear everything that -- all this negativity that's been going around this room. I mean, I've been here for an hour and I L v a a� d M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J a N G D IL 0 m A 2 �L C� G CL m c m E V 2 a Packet Pg. 475 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 89 haven't heard anything of what I wanted to hear, like do I have to -- what criteria do I have to meet so that I can qualify for your standards? MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. MS. MONTGOMERY: But please, though, let me say this. That's why the state of Florida requires local governments to not discriminate against people. Unfortunately, it happens, but the law doesn't allow it. MR. INCAN: Thank you. Mike Incan (phonetic). I live in Naples Reserve. When I got the letter that there was going to be a development mailed to my house, immediately upset because I was told, like many other folks, that it was going to be a preserve forever back there, but once I calmed down and started looking around, and you need to figure out, what are my options, right, as a homeowner. My house literally looks directly into the preserve that is being proposed for development. So to be 100 percent clear, I'm not for any development in that preserve that's going to ruin the serene preserve view that I look at, whether it's Habitat or $10 million homes. So with that clear and on the record, that I'm a Packet Pg. 476 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 90 9A7 not for any development back there, you know, when I started looking around for, what are my options, I retained an attorney. I reached out to Mark Stein, a long-time commissioner on the Collier County Planning Commission, James Sabo or Sabo, I reached out to him. I did a lot of research into what is the process for rezoning, what are the steps that need to happen. I reached out to Laura, and that's how I found more information about these plans. And so Myra (phonetic) from Habitat reached out and invited me into the office that I met in last week. I went there as an individual, not as a representative of Naples Reserve. And, you know, we were sitting there, you and I, Nick, looking at the plans, potential plans, and figuring out, is there something we can do to maintain as much of a serene view for both our communities, right, for the residents of Habitat or whichever development would be there, and also for the ones at the Naples Reserve, who are going to lose the preserve. And, of course, there was no recording equipment or anything like that. So it's hard to, you know, be -- to prove this, but, you know, you, a Packet Pg. 477 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 91 9A7 if I recall correctly, specifically you said, well, what about a wall. And, you know, we took a paper and you drew the wall and kind of how the area that you wanted, you know, thought it might go. It was like an L shape. You know, then we had some dialogue about, well, the codes only allow six feet, but, you know, we could -- we're already going for eight feet because the folks across the way, they went eight feet. So we could even potentially get an eight -foot wall back here. And, of course, I'm sitting there saying, well, you know, that seems -- if there's going to be a development there, that seems a reasonable place to start. And then we talked about heavy vegetation on both sides of the wall, esthetically pleasing so that, you know, residents of both sides are looking at it and it's just not an ugly concrete wall. You talked specifically about the importance of working with our community throughout the design process so that, at the end of the day, when the wall is built, nobody's upset and saying, you know, wait a second, this isn't what we agreed to, right, so you want kind of our input. So taking all that information, you know, I'm L v a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R_ N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 478 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 92 engaging residents, and I have dozens of signatures, right, basically, what we talked about, about the wall. And, again, I do not want a development, regardless, but if there is going to be one, what are our options. So to listen to you, you know, talk about how you're exploring options, and it costs a lot of money, which I don't -- I don't disagree with, and I'm sure -- it's a little frustrating because I feel like, you know, having you offering that and now I don't feel like you are backing that, it almost feels like you're kind of backing away and leaving yourself an out for in the future being able to come back with a -- you know, and say, well, we tried, but we just need to keep this, you know, community affordable. And so we just can't do it or it's got to be a four foot. So I just wanted to get on the record that's my recollection of how our meeting went. I'm disappointed that you aren't committing to this wall that we discussed right now, because this is how the process works, right? There's a development meeting here. This is on the record. So everything that's said here gets put into a report that Mr. Sabo creates and becomes a Packet Pg. 479 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 93 part of the plan that's ultimately reviewed. So if you were to commit to a wall today, that is very important and would be much more difficult to back out of in the future. So then it goes to the Collier County Planning Commission, which is a volunteer board that reviews whether the plans meet code and gives a yes -or -no vote based only on whether or not it meets code. And then, ultimately, it goes to the Board of County Commissioners with Donna Fiala and several other members, and they take, obviously, much more into consideration on whether they ultimately approve it, but I would, again, request, you know, us being on the record, that you can commit to this wall that we discussed along the border between Naples Reserve. And, again, I have dozens of folks that support this. And, you know, I don't want any development, but if there is going to be one, who knows what will happen, whether it's Habitat or million -dollar homes, I want to preserve as much as possible that border, for not only myself, but for other folks around. Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thanks, Mike. So, you know, (indiscernible) and I truly a Packet Pg. 480 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 94 appreciated the time that we spent together discussing that. What I really appreciate is your reaching out to say, hey, let's have a dialogue, let's have more conversation about it. So, you know, I don't disagree with any of the points you just made, but there's a few things that were left out. Number one, I said, I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to give you a firm commitment on Monday night because between -- I think our conversation was Wednesday of last week, was it Wednesday or Tuesday or something, and today, I just don't have enough data to be able to sit up here and say, yes, Mike, we can do it, we can do it for this price and this, and so on and so forth. We are going to continue to explore those options. My intention is to, I think, even Myra sent you an e-mail back and saying, hey, once we get some more data, we'd like to sit down again with you or other residents within Naples Reserve and talk those points out. MR. INCAN: Which we still would like to do. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yep. And I truly appreciate that, you know, and I get, you know, the idea of -- the way I understood it, from not just you, but L U a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J a N G D a 0 le m A 2 ca CL m c m E V 2 a Packet Pg. 481 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 95 9A7 from other residents I've talked to at Naples Reserve, was that when it came to the preserve itself, they were sold by whoever that that was going to be a preserve. Now, all I can say for whoever said that was, you know, shame on them for selling you something like that, because that property has been owned by Habitat since -- I believe since 2007. And so for whether -- whoever it was, whether it was a developer or an agent, whoever it might be, to say that that's going to be in perpetuity kept as native lands was just a pointblank lie. And I know personally, if it was myself that just purchased that home and that was there somewhere on record, that that was said to me, I'd have a major issue as well, because -- because that's what I was buying into. And so I agree. Hopefully, we can continue the dialogue, the conversation between us as we sit there and start to develop plans and ideas and cost numbers to see what we could do. I know I believe I did talk to a representative from iStar, that said they're also looking at committing some type of landscaping enhancement down on that southern property line as well. L v a a� as M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J a N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 482 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 96 9A7 So I appreciate your comments. I will not deny any of your comments. I think you accurately reflected our conversation with the exception of the fact that I believe I was pretty straightforward, at that point in time, and said by tonight it would probably be too difficult to get you a direct answer, but we're absolutely 100 percent still open for those conversations to see what we can do. Thank you. MS. MONTGOMERY: This young lady is next. MS. RAKESTRAW: I am Vivian Rakestraw and I live in Reflection Lakes. I have a couple of questions. One of them is about the applicants that come to you for housing. Will they have some -- will the main person on the mortgage or somebody always be working? Will there be somebody when they apply for your loans that's working or will you be selling houses to people that don't have an income? MR. KOULOHERAS: I'm, sorry, ma'am. One second. (Multiple simultaneous conversations.) MS. RAKESTRAW: Well, I'm a nurse, too. I guess I better get back there. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yes, ma'am. Is she Packet Pg. 483 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 97 okay (indiscernible) ? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, ma'am. I'm sorry. So to answer your question, you said is there someone that will always have a job that is on the primary mortgage or the mortgage. So to answer your question, yes, that has always been the case in all of our applicants. Now, for me to sit there and tell you that someone doesn't lose a job through the course of time -- MS. RAKESTRAW: I understand. MR. KOULOHERAS: -- I could never tell you that, but I will say they have a mortgage with Habitat. Habitat for Humanity has repayment structures in place that are all, you know, recorded documents. And if they do not meet those criteria, whether it's on day one or day 360, then Habitat can take corrective action against that. And I will say this. In my time at Habitat, I am only aware of maybe four instances where we have had some type of extenuating circumstance, and I'll tell you one specifically. We had a family lived right down the street here, actually. Their small child, I believe at the time, he was about six, found out he had Packet Pg. 484 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 98 cancer. They were doing treatments up at the Children's Hospital in Tampa. And they came in, talked to Lisa, talked to myself, and said, listen, it is just very difficult for us right now to be making all these payments work. And, at that point in time, we took the privilege that's awarded -- allowed to us, and we said, you know what, we sympathize with that. We're going to give you a three-month reprieve up front or four month, I forget exactly, I think it was three, and we're just going to tack it onto the back end of your mortgage. That has happened. But as I said, in my 15 years at Habitat, I believe I've seen that happen four times, because we take that very serious. I'm actually -- to be honest, I'm proud that we're able to do that, because -- nothing against Bank of America, that's who my mortgages is with, but I know I couldn't call Bank of America and get that same treatment, so. MS. RAKESTRAW: I know there are some mortgage companies that actually do, you know, take those things into consideration, thank God. And I commend you all for doing that. My second question, just that I'm a registered L v a a� d M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R_ N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E V 2 a Packet Pg. 485 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 99 nurse, and I'd like to know what the cost of the houses are going to be. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, sure. So right now, what we're estimating the average sales price of a home within Regal II is going to be in the low 200s, and I mean low, like 200 to 225 is where they're going to come in. Now, I want you to remember what I said about affordability as well. So if there's homeowners that are unable to afford that amount, we are going to try to assist them in some way, shape or form to cover that differential between affordability and then the sales price. But, yeah, right now, I mean, it's hard to kind of put an exact number on something that's potentially three years out, but right now we're looking at the numbers in the low 200s, 200 to 225 range. MS. RAKESTRAW: Okay. Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. MS. ARIA: Hi. My name is Constance Aria (phonetic), and I live in Reflection Lakes. I had a question regarding why maybe -- I understand that you have this land since 2010, which I just learned tonight, and I, like many Packet Pg. 486 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 100 9A7 people, bought my home with the understanding that we had preserve area around there. And, yes, I understood that there would be, you know, there's a path of progress out the East Trail, but what's being proposed right now isn't in line with the density of the surrounding developments, and it's kind of sandwiched in. So not only is it taking up what I thought was an environmental preserve, which I felt really deeply about, and I really kind of resented when somebody said, you know, the people here are against Habitat or against affordable housing. That's not the case at all. It's about density and balance and win/win within our communities. And it is pretty evident that East Naples -- you know, if there's a pocket of preserve that we thought was preserved, all of a sudden, we have high-density housing going in. So it's a density issue. And, yeah, it does affect everybody's land values because, for one thing, anything that affects the schools, like people pointed out, you know, quality schools. Boy, oh, boy, is that ever going to affect resale for people in surrounding communities. And, you know, it's great to have high L v a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R_ N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 487 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 standards for everyone, win/win for everyone, but there's got to be balance. And I feel like, you know, the way this was approached, all my life -- I grew up poor. I worked hard. I finally got a place that I thought was kind of near preserve area and for retirement. And I feel like this hasn't been so much of a creative brainstorming opportunity as it's been like a dog and pony show, and people who have questions are being told that they're discriminatory. And we have an attorney moderating this meeting? I mean, for heaven sakes, I'm very, very, very disappointed in Habitat, which my whole life I supported, but I'm really disappointed with how this is coming down. MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. Yes (indiscernible) . UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I'll make this pretty quick, okay? I've heard different stories, and I heard you just say something like that we've owned this land since 2007. She said 2010. I've heard all kinds of stuff. Do you own the land you're looking to rezone? Packet Pg. 488 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 102 9A7 MR. KOULOHERAS: There's 23 acres. Of those 23 acres, we currently own about 12 of those 23 acres. The additional 11 are under contract. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Are under contract? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Are there any situations on that contract that you all have to meet in order for them sell it to you? MR. KOULOHERAS: At this point in time, there are certain restrictions in the contract, but none of them pertain to zoning approvals. So it's all due diligence based on environmental assessments, regulatory assessments, stuff like that. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. And I don't think -- one thing I'm going to say here. I really kind of felt the statement that was made earlier that Reflection Lakes and preserve are discriminatory against poor people. Okay. Not a good statement to make. Number two, I used to build Habitat homes in Tennessee. Okay. Beautiful communities and things like that. I mean, really nice. People there were really nice. All I know is in the last two or three weeks, I've been driving through, which I haven't been a Packet Pg. 489 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 103 9A7 over there since I moved here a year ago, they don't keep the property up. Are they going to have an HOA to mow their lawns on the old section as opposed to the new section? Because -- and it also seems like, over the last two and three weeks, you all went through a massive cleanup campaign over there. So -- because one time you go over there, stuff's all over the place. The other time you go, like this last three or four days ago, everything's kind of cleaned up. Even some of the mowed -- lawns were kind of mowed, okay. But I didn't know what you were going to do. You said the HOA on these things was going to do all the maintenance, things like that. I guess they're going to do house painting? MR. KOULOHERAS: So -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Are they going to take care of everything? I mean, are they going to have something like we have, where we have our HOA and our lawns and everything like that are taken care of? You talked about it on the new section, how about the old section, as people have to go in there? MR. KOULOHERAS: So, first off, to answer your a Packet Pg. 490 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 104 9A7 question about a cleanup campaign. I can tell you right now, on my life or anyone else, that is not the case. Habitat for Humanity never put together a cleanup campaign to say, oh, well, let's get this all ready because we know we're going to have this meeting. So if it happened, it happened on its own, but it had nothing to do driven by Habitat for Humanity, just to clear that up. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Who are the people that actually own the property? MR. KOULOHERAS: So in Regal Acres, phase 1, it is the existing homeowners. The existing homeowners, obviously, not only own their home and the property that sits underneath their home, but they are also in full control of the HOA itself. So Habitat for Humanity, similar to -- I keep picking on D.R., I don't mean to, but D.R. Horton owns the HOA, if you will, or has managing control of the HOA up until a certain percentage of homes are sold. Habitat for Humanity acts in the very same way. So at whatever that percentage number is, I don't remember off the top of my head, it's between 70 and 90 percent, I believe, that's when it gets turned over to the HOA for their total control and a Packet Pg. 491 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 105 9A7 maintenance. Now, within the new subdivision, we are writing into the documents that the common area maintenance and the maintenance of the property itself at the house is going to be maintained by a company, not by the homeowners themselves. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So you'll kind of have two different HOAs. MR. KOULOHERAS: Currently. Right now, we have two different HOAs. And that being said, Habitat for Humanity is actually going -- Habitat for Humanity -- Lisa and myself are talking to our board about how we can potentially do stuff for our older communities, knowing that we never -- we never get rid of them or we never lose contact with them. And seeing some of those mistakes and how can we go back and take some corrective actions to get in there. Now, you've got to remember, it's not the easiest thing to do, because it would be like -- you said you lived in Reflection Lakes, sir? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Uh-huh. MR. KOULOHERAS: It would be like D.R. Horton or Neal Communities coming in ten years later and Packet Pg. 492 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 106 9A7 say, hey, HOA, we don't like the way you're doing it, we want to do it this way. So there's hurdles to overcome, but we have been trying to work on that for about 18 months now. It hasn't been hugely successful, but we're still diligently trying to work at that issue. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So I'm just getting back to the property ownership. So the new acreage you're actually asking for rezoning, you don't actually own that? It's under contract, but you don't actually own that. MR. KOULOHERAS: We own about -- we own about 12 acres of the 23. We do currently own that. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, you already have approval of the 12 acres, correct? MR. KOULOHERAS: The approval of the 12 acres is a -- I'm sorry -- I misunderstood your question. The 12 acres that are currently sitting there are zoned agricultural as well. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. MR. KOULOHERAS: So the 12 acres that -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So you're actually trying to zone stuff you do own and stuff you don't own? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, that is correct. Packet Pg. 493 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 107 9A7 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. Thank you. MS. MURPHY: Liz Murphy (phonetic), Reflection Lakes. Actually, the gentleman asked a few of the questions that I was going to ask, so you answered most of them, but I'm just curious. So you own 12 out of 23. So there's 11 acres that you don't currently own, but you're under agreement to purchase? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, ma'am. MS. MURPHY: With contingencies. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, ma'am. MS. MURPHY: So once those contingencies are met, regardless of the change in zoning, you're going to purchase those acres? MR. KOULOHERAS: As it stands today, it is Habitat's intention to purchase that acreage, yes. MS. MURPHY: Okay. You're under contract. Like I say, so even if the zoning doesn't go through, you're going to purchase those 11 acres? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, ma'am. MS. MURPHY: Okay. And does the other owner have to go in with you if the zoning is going to be before you purchase the land, the other owner has to go in with you to apply for the change? Packet Pg. 494 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 108 9A7 MR. KOULOHERAS: So, yes. Yeah, the other -- MS. MURPHY: Well, I don't know about authorization, but where I come from, and I'm from Massachusetts, not far from where you came from, to be quite honest with you, where I come from, the owner who has the interest in the land, who's the fee owner of the land has to be on the application and apply because, basically, it's for them. It's not for a third party. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, so I -- Laura, probably, correct me if I'm wrong, but there has to be authorization, just as you said, and please correct me if I'm wrong, that the owner is under the -- is willing and in the understanding that whoever is buying the property, Habitat, whatever, what they're doing and where they're going with it. So they are kind of a part of the process. it doesn't mean they're involved in the process, per se, as far as, you know, day-to-day activity, conversation, stuff like that. But, yes, when we submit our paperwork to the county, the Collier County legal team is going to say, wait a minute, you don't own these 11 acres. Who's giving you permission to try to encumber these 11 acres. And you have to fill out an authorization form. a Packet Pg. 495 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 109 9A7 MS. MURPHY: So Collier County will -- that's what their policy is, they'll authorize somebody -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Correct. And they've already -- MS. MURPHY: -- who can actually go in and do that on behalf of somebody, like a proposed buyer? MR. KOULOHERAS: Uh-huh. Yeah. Here. I'm sorry. This should give you a much better -- MS. DeJOHN: Excuse me. Laura DeJohn, a planner with Johnson Engineering. It is actually a standard part of the Collier County application form. It has a blank to fill in who is the applicant, who is the owner, is there a contract for purchase, what is the date of the contract for purchase. So it's -- it's normal in Florida, in southwest Florida for transactions to be happening -- MS. MURPHY: So as long as there's a contract for sale -- MS. DeJOHN: Yes. MS. MURPHY: -- that's considered the vested interest? MS. DeJOHN: Yes. MS. MURPHY: -- in the property that you're -- Packet Pg. 496 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 110 9A7 MS. DeJOHN: And then the signatures, as Nick described. They're to be notarized affidavits identifying the owner, their name, you know, their corporate background, if there's a corporate entity, signing the authorization for this application to be submitted, yes. MS. MURPHY: Thank you. And I'll just make one final comment as well, and I'm just going to expound on what the previous speaker, you know, was saying, is, you know, when we purchased the land in Reflection Lakes, I did my due diligence. I looked at the land. Okay. It was zoned agricultural. So, you know, it's almost like they're trying to shame us into saying we don't want Habitat in our backyard. That wasn't the case at all. The case was to sit out there with a cup of coffee in the morning, you know what I'm saying? Looking out. We've got the wildlife out there. It's beautiful out there. Everybody's looking at nice scenery. And now, all of a sudden, I'm just saying, whether it's, like I say, million -dollar homes or whether it's Habitat for Humanity or whatever, it's not just the traffic. It's not just, you know, the a Packet Pg. 497 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 view or whatever. It's the noise, okay. It's the garbage. And I'm not saying they're going to create any more garbage than I would create, but you know what? It gets windy. Okay. How many times you go out in your yard and you've got a piece of paper blowing around, or you got something else. It's just because there's a lot -- you know, there's more houses. It just creates a lot more nuisance, okay. So that's all I have to say. It's not that we're against anything. It's just that when I bought, that's what I was told, and then all of a sudden -- and I did my due diligence. And now, all of a sudden, everything has changed. And it just doesn't seem fair to the people who went in under that -- you know, that's just the way it was. That's all I have to say. MR. KOULOHERAS: No. And I'll tell you -- like I said before, I appreciate those comments, because I don't like knowing that someone, or whoever that person was, misled you down the road that -- road. MS. MURPHY: They led a lot of people down the Packet Pg. 498 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Yeah. (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: That's why we're here. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yep. Sorry. MS. DeJOHN: Just a quick geography issue I want to clarify. Reflection Lakes does have a preserve that -- so, again, Neale described how the code defines preserve. Preserves have conservation easements over them. They cannot be touched. That's a Collier County Land Development Code defined preserved. And when we use the word "preserve," we're accustomed to that definition. There is a conservation easement over a preserve along the eastern edge of Reflection Lakes. I don't know the name of your street that runs east -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Manchester Driver. MS. DeJOHN: Manchester. So the houses off of Manchester have woods in their backyard. That's 150 feet of preserve that has an easement over it that's part of Reflection Lakes. Does that clarify? Because the proposed Packet Pg. 499 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 113 9A7 development of the Habitat site includes -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Just one question. (Indiscernible) 300 feet (indiscernible) 150 plus 150. MS. DeJOHN: It includes -- plus 150. Includes the -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Or is that 150 plus 300? MS. DeJOHN: No, 150 -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: What we were told is no one will ever build behind us. That's what we were told. MS. DeJOHN: But okay -- I think once you get acclimated to Florida. You get to hear that statement when you first come to Florida, and then you get to experience it, because just like was stated by someone at West Winds, who is the longest standing community in this area, West Winds probably thought Reflection Lakes would be a preserve forever. So we -- it's a matter of fact that you can't guarantee someone is not going to use their land that they own. If it's someone else's land, it's improper to assume that there's some type of control over someone not using their land. Packet Pg. 500 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 114 9A7 MR. KRASKA: Hi. My name is Paul Kraska and I live also in Reflection Lakes. I had a plethora of information I wanted to ask. It was covered. I'm not going to go over it in the interest of time. But I do think that we are either evading or not bringing up the fact, what are the young adults and children going to do in this community? You have no pools. You have no tennis courts. You have no basketball, pickleball, no administrative building, nothing. So where do these kids go? Are they going to be now infiltrating into Naples Reserve? We've had issues with people infiltrating into Reflection Lakes recently as this past Saturday. So where -- how do you calm our fears down on that? MR. KOULOHERAS: Sure. To answer your question -- so once again we're going to kind of compare Habitat of old to habitat of new. Habitat for Humanity of old would sit there and look at a piece of property, and we'd look at that property and say, okay, we think we can get 200 homes in it or we could get 190 homes and have a nice play area. And the mentality would be, get Packet Pg. 501 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 115 9A7 200 homes in it, because that's what we're in the business of doing. The Habitat of new looks at a place like the proposed Regal II here. We say, okay, well, with -- long-term maintenance has an affordable factor as well. And we say, you know, we know our families, from an HOA fee, cannot afford long-term maintenance of multi-million dollar clubhouse facilities that have a pool or an administrative building or the upkeep of, you know, Har -Tru tennis courts and all that stuff. But we do realize that there needs to be an outlet for children and families. And so what we've tried to do with this community is look at outlets that are low, long-term maintenance cost. So in the recreational area that we are proposing, is not only now -- it's roughly the size of a football field, whereas, before, if you drive through any other old Habitat community, it's a postage stamp. It's, you know, 40 by 40 at best. And within that football field size, roughly, we plan on having a playground for younger kids, let's call it the two to ten bracket. We plan on having a little gazebo area, is what we're proposing right now, so families can go L v a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J a N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 502 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 116 9A7 out there and have a place to socialize or have a little birthday party. We're also proposing to build a half -court basketball court on-site, as well as a smaller, it may not be Astro Turf, but that would be my preference, just because of the maintenance cost long-term on it, even though it costs a lot more money up front, some type of utility field, if you will, that you could go out there and you could play soccer, you could throw a football, you could do that type of stuff. And then, within the community as well, we're trying to implement more, not only the sidewalk system, but we're trying to implement walking trails. So, for example, we're talking about maybe putting a walking trail that goes around the lake, a walking trail that comes around some part of the homes, the backyard, if you will, of the homes, to give someone, if they wanted to go out and jog laps, for example, it would give someone just to go out there and walk their child or to go jog laps. So we're trying to do things a lot better than we were as far as accommodating exactly what you said, but with those other facilities, you know, L v a a� d M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R_ N G D a 0 m A 2 �L C� G CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 503 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 117 9A7 like the ones that are in Reflection Lakes, the ones that are in Naples Reserve, I'm not going to say I know exactly what your HOA fee is, but my thinking is it's probably in the neighborhood of $300 a month or more, and $300 a month in an HOA fee just doesn't work for affordability for, really, anyone that Habitat tailors to or even that income bracket right above it. So I hope I helped answer your question. MR. KRASKA: Yeah. It's just the fact that you didn't speak about that. This is the first (indiscernible) you brought up, finally. And I'm concerned because I'm a family -orientated person, and I said, we can't forget that. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. No, and you're absolutely right. MR. KRASKA: (Indiscernible) Habitat (indiscernible) this non -55 -year-old age limit community. (Indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Yep. Yeah. Absolutely. In one of our renderings back there, you can kind of see it. It's on the southern side, if you will, but it's not fully -- it's not the greatest aerial of that rendering. Yes, sir. a Packet Pg. 504 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 118 9A7 MR. DOMINICS: How you doing? My name is Rick Dominics (phonetic). I live on Greenway Road. Does anybody else here live on Greenway Road? I didn't think so. I live directly across the street from the first entrance of Regal Acres. And since they've built that, you guys can't control the traffic now, how are you going to control more traffic than what we already have? I mean, they've got them running up and down the road 50, 60 miles an hour. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: They have drag races on that road. MR. DOMINICS: Oh, yeah, you hear them. They're drag racing. You call the Sheriff's Department. They come out. They're gone. Every week, I pick up -- I got a UTV (phonetic) with a dump bed in it. I pick up -- I fill that dump bed with trash out of my ditch. I've picked up dirty diapers out of my ditch. And you're going to sit there and say, well, how do you know it was us? Well, the trash dump stops at the second entrance to Regal Acres. Past that, all the way to Naples Reserve, there's no trash in the ditch. Packet Pg. 505 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 119 9A7 So I don't know how -- you know, when you first started this deal, it was supposed to be 75 houses. They pulled a permit. The permit said 75 houses. I go to Tennessee. I come back. All of a sudden, there's 100 and some houses, but the permit was only 75 when you first started, before you cleared the land. So, you know, I don't know how you're going to control 116 more people, how you're going to control another 300 cars coming up and down Greenway Road. You can't control what you got. MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, so, for the clarity of the 75 homes, Rick, I mean, you and I have known each other for years. MR. DOMINICS: Yeah. MR. KOULOHERAS: The ordinance that was passed in 2007 or so, listed out the 184 units then. So I'm not quite sure where that number 75 is coming from, but I'm certainly not going to argue with it. As far as maintaining the trash and the control. So from Habitat's standpoint, I can tell you that our efforts have stepped up. Our HOA rules and regulations are stepping up. And we're going to try to do some things to improve that. Packet Pg. 506 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 120 9A7 Am I going to be able to sit here and guarantee you, Rick, you're never going to have to pick up another piece of trash in that ditch? You know, I couldn't do it. As far as the drag racing and that type of stuff goes, I can't tell you how many times I've almost been run off that road by dump trucks coming out of Naples Reserve. And I have personally called the police no less than a dozen times myself to say, can you please set up speed traps out here. We've talked to the HOA. We've talked to -- so we're going to continue doing that, but I don't disagree with you, Rick, and I think that, you know, collectively, if you call me, I mean, I think you've known me long enough, every time you've called me to say, hey, Nick, I've got something out here, I've pretty much jumped on it. And, you know, we'll continue to try to work on it, but I can't sit there and guarantee you that, yeah, I'll have a specific cleanup crew that goes out there every Friday. MR. DOMINICS: Well, you know, you bring up the dump trucks. The neighborhood got together and everybody called so many times, they set up speed traps for the dump trucks. a Packet Pg. 507 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 121 9A7 I talked to the Sheriff's Department. He pulled over more people from Regal Acres than he pulled over dump trucks. MR. KOULOHERAS: Did he? MR. DOMINICS: So, you know. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes. Well, that's good information to know. We'll have -- MR. DOMINICS: I mean, you know, I come home from work, and I'm coming down Greenway Road, and I've got people stuck up my bumper and passing me, and I'm doing 30, 35 miles an hour, which is the speed limit so they've got to be doing at least 40, 50 miles an hour. Everybody's worrying about where the kids are going to go to school. I don't see having any kids left if you let them walk down the road. MR. KOULOHERAS: No. You make a valid point. MR. DOMINICS: And they do walk down the road. MR. KOULOHERAS: They absolutely do. MR. DOMINICS: They talk about building walls. You know, I'm 400 feet off the road. You know how far my house sits off the road. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes, sir. MR. DOMINICS: Okay. You guys built the wall. I sit down and eat dinner, and I'm listening to Packet Pg. 508 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 122 9A7 kids yelling and screaming like they were in my front yard. So your walls, you know, you can plant all the walls and trees and shrubs and all the other crap, it doesn't do any good. You know, they need a place to play instead of out and about in the street. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. MR. DOMINICS: You know, and they're going to get hit. Somebody's going to get hit. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. No, I tell you, I hope that day never comes, but I don't disagree with you. We've got to do something to address that. MR. DOMINICS: How are we going to control -- how are we going to control more traffic and more trash? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Well, the only thing I can tell you right now is that the Habitat for Humanity -- you know me. I encourage this type of communication. And I know that I've gone out there. I know I've personally -- well, I'm not going to talk about me. I know Lisa herself has personally gone and went down after a car going down Greenway Road and stopped them at 41 and got out and yelled at them. What we can do is we can sit there and a Packet Pg. 509 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 123 9A7 continue. If this information comes in, I'll talk to the Sheriff's Department as well, we can sit there and continue to talk to these folks and try and educate them and tell them how stupid it is to be going like a, you know, and Knight Rider down Greenway Road, which is, if I'm not mistaken, it's a 30. MR. DOMINICS: 30, yeah, it's 30 miles an hour. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, it's a 30, if I'm not mistaken. MR. DOMINICS: Yeah. MR. KOULOHERAS: So I don't agree -- can't -- MR. DOMINICS: At 30, you're going to get run over. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Yeah. MR. DOMINICS: That's the way it is. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. So one of the concerns our homeowners in Regal, the existing phase of Regal Acres brought up was cars traveling through Regal Acres I to get to the proposed new site, and we're talking about speeding and stuff like that, and we're talking about those speed bumps and stuff like that, not that that cures the problem, but it Packet Pg. 510 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 124 9A7 helps settle the problem a little bit. The other thing that we've been trying to work on for years is getting some type of lights down Greenway Road. I know it's a county road. So we can't do it ourselves, but I don't have a great answer to say, yeah, Mike, you know, we're going to sit out -- I'm sorry, Rick, we are going to sit out there with the Sheriff's Department for a month and nip it in the bud. I hope we can do that. And if we can, we will, because I don't disagree with you. MR. DOMINICS: Well, you know, I had another situation about four weeks ago. I woke up about 2:00 in the morning, and I got lights shining in the front of my house. I get up, and I go, where are these lights coming from. And, you know, across the street, they got that little place you can like park one car? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Yes. MR. DOMINICS: It's directly across from my driveway. There's a pickup truck or SUV sitting there with its lights off. So I'm sitting there, sitting there. And he turns his lights off. A car comes by, he flashes his lights on and off. So I called the Sheriff's Department. And Packet Pg. 511 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 125 9A7 she says, we're going to send somebody out. If he moves, give me a call back. A minute later, he moves. He goes into Regal Acres. Right behind him is two sheriff's cars. Well, I already had her on the phone. I said, your guys are right behind him. He just pulled into Regal Acres. So they pull in one entrance, come out the other entrance. When they got right in front of my house, the Sheriff's Department pulls him over. So I'm standing there in the dark. They can't see me. He's sitting there talking to this guy. He doesn't have his hand on the gun. He did not check the guy's driver's license. And I go, what's up with this. So he takes off. I called the deputy over. And I said, what's going on. He said, oh, it was some kid sleeping. I said, it was some kid sleeping, flashing his lights on and off? Well, he was scared. Well, what I did was screw up an undercover operation. He was a cop. He didn't check his driver's license. You're going to let some kid drive away that's sleeping on the street? Uh-uh. No way. So I don't know what was going on with that L v a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J a N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 512 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 126 9A7 deal. It's an assumption of mine. It might not be true, but it just makes sense. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. No, it's -- MR. DOMINICS: That's all -- you know, that's all I got to say, Nick. Same stuff that I always (indiscernible) . MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. I understand that. MR. DOMINICS: Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: I agree. No. Thank you, Rick. Yes, sir. You got -- oh, I'm sorry. Sorry about that. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So we also have panthers running around in this area, so -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: We also have panthers running around this area, so losing any of the green space or the preserve area is detrimental. Is there any flexibility on the design of this to where we can have 300 feet of green space between all of the developments? In particular, where you're proposing the retention pond, can that be moved and a 300 -foot buffer of green space be placed there? Packet Pg. 513 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 127 9A7 MR. KOULOHERAS: So to answer -- I mean, Laura might want to better answer -- well, Laura's not here. She's -- but to answer your question specifically about the Florida panther, the Florida panther, there's primary and secondary consultation areas with U.S. Fish & Wildlife, because the panther is obviously still a listed species, and they will -- we will perform and they will require us to perform any type of studies where we could negatively affect the Florida panther. That doesn't necessarily prohibit you from building there. Obviously, all the surrounding communities around us have to go through the same process. And, typically, what U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service would rather see you do is purchase mitigation credits to keep preserve in perpetuity in an area that the Florida panther, it's more conducive to their habitat. So instead of creating a little pocket node, if you will, within this community, they would rather you go and give them money. Then they purchase 100 acres of land, let's say, in, you know, Lee, Hendry or Collier County somewhere where there's more panther habitat. To answer your question specifically about a Packet Pg. 514 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 128 9A7 flexibility within the site plan. So there are some -- there is some ability to work with the site plan. The reason we have designed the site plan kind of the way it is right now and not create that preserve up around the north side is because the north side of the property doesn't really have the best vegetation for a preserve as far as the native stuff that's in there. The second part of it, from a utility standpoint, the lake is there for -- as a buffer, but it's also there because if we use a gravity sewer system to feed down to the existing Regal I sewer line, that house that's to the furthest point north, if you will, in our community, that is the furthest away that house can get in order for that gravity system to work unless we wanted to go and build that house an additional, you know, foot, two foot, three foot, four foot higher. But we didn't want to do that because every bit that we propose to go higher is more of a chance that someone could see the top of that house from a surrounding neighborhood. So we're -- that question about moving stuff has been brought up before. We're working with L v a a� a� M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J R- N N G D IL 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 515 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 129 9,47 Johnson Engineering to see if there's any type of shifts that we can do, but that's where we currently stand. Okay. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) water retention pond for (indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: No. You need a water retention pond no matter what. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Does that water retention pond count as wetland acres? MR. KOULOHERAS: No, it does not. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Does not. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Correct. Hi. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). Just in reference to the traffic or the impact study. How long does that take? MR. BROWN: The actual study? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Why don't (indiscernible) folks can hear you. MR. BROWN: Depending on the complexity, the traffic impact study can take six weeks -- six months to perform, depending on how many intersections need to be analyzed. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So just say six to eight. No? Packet Pg. 516 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 130 9A7 MR. BROWN: Sure. Six to eight months. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And when did it start? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And when is that done? Is that done during snowbird season or is that done when (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Well, that was going to be my question. What time of the year was it done? MR. BROWN: I don't know off the top of my head when the traffic counts were done. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I'm sorry. I cut you off. Right? MR. BROWN: I'm not sure exactly when the traffic counts were done. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Because you stated it ain't done yet. MR. BROWN: It's a long-term process. There's data collection. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. MR. BROWN: There's data analysis. And you look at multiple intersections. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. MR. BROWN: And it's covered multiple times during the year. Packet Pg. 517 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MS. MONTGOMERY: I think they're wondering about when you did the count, but regardless of when you do the counts, the traffic counts, you have to adjust them to peak season; is that correct? MR. BROWN: Right. They're adjusted for peak season, for peak hour, and there's also growth rates that are attached to those. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Another quick questions. In reference to wetlands, now, I'm originally from up north, and if there's wetlands, there's no building allowed at all. So is there wetlands on this property that you're looking at? MR. BROWN: There are wetlands on the property, yes. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And you're able to build on the wetlands? MR. BROWN: Yes. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: On the wetland itself, or do you have to shift it over, like fill it in or something? MR. BROWN: Yeah. You wouldn't put the building on the wetlands. So you would bring in -- Packet Pg. 518 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 132 9A7 import fill and impact the wetland, and you mitigate for that off-site. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. Thank you. MS. MONTGOMERY: And just for the record, in all of southwest Florida, don't you generally have to fill for the house pads? MR. BROWN: Absolutely. MS. MONTGOMERY: So everybody that's here probably lives on a piece of property that's been filled? MR. BROWN: They've probably had several feet of fill. That's why you have all those lakes. MS. MONTGOMERY: Right. Thank you. MR. CILIA: Hello. My name is Richard Cilia. I live over in Naples Reserve, and I'm originally from New York City, 34 years with the New York City Fire Department. And I've seen ghettos turned into beautiful million -dollar neighborhoods also. As a matter fact, we were just talking about the Bronx, the way it was done through politics, okay, and that's what scares me, is politics. You talk about these homes could -- being put in. You're talking about two-story homes. People talking about walls. Walls are not going to do it. Packet Pg. 519 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 133 9A7 If you put up an eight -foot wall and you got a 16 -foot -- story house, people can still look over the fence and look at their neighbors. The other thing is the effect, what you're going to have on the animals. We just had a smoky season, and the amount of animals that came onto Naples Reserve and onto Reflection Lake were outstanding. I mean, I've never seen a bear up until that time when we had the heavy smoke. I had my wife was driving, and a cougar ran out in front. Every day, we see deer. Again, what you're doing is like taking everything and just pushing them out of the way. So, eventually, where do they go? The other thing was -- that was brought to my attention is when we looked at the map, okay, of this street, Evergreen, there is a truck route that goes through there and that was built so the trucks could come in. They don't have to use the main gate, okay, to -- MR. KOULOHERAS: You're talking at Reflection Lakes? MR. CILIA: Reflection Lakes, exactly. MR. KOULOHERAS: Okay. MR. CILIA: And that gate was put in. All Packet Pg. 520 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 134 9A7 right. Now, say, for argument's sake, now you're going to build your homes there, okay. Eventually, you're going to close that gate so that those people cannot come into Reflections Lake or into Naples Reserve and use their facilities since these people at Naples Reserve or at Reflection Lake are paying a high HOA fee and a CDD fee to have this stuff, and these people are not. So to stop them, you're going to close the gate. Now, did anybody respond to the fire department and say, well, you know, if you close that gate, you have no egress. If the front of -- if the front of Naples Reserve or Reflection Lake is the only way out, and it's on fire, people are trapped inside. There is no second exit. It's closed, unless you got a truck that will go through it. MR. KOULOHERAS: Go through it, yeah. MR. CILIA: And that's just -- you know, I'm talking -- I'm not talking about -- Habitat for Humanity is a great thing, okay. I'm just saying that I think it's a tight spot. You -- we had -- last year, you had hurricanes and the place got flooded. And when you start building houses, you're taking away land. You take a Packet Pg. 521 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 135 9A7 away trees, there's nothing to absorb that water, okay. You go creating another problem. And that's all I have to say. Thank you. MR. KOULOHERAS: No. Thank you. MR. CILIA: Thank you for your attention. MR. KOULOHERAS: No, I appreciate your comments. Yeah. I'm sorry. Go ahead. MS. MONTGOMERY: I just wanted to respond. I know he's concerned about flooding, and under the applicant's handbook, which is the rules that the South Florida Water Management District requires you to comply with, does it allow you to cause flooding on off-site properties? MR. KOULOHERAS: No. By rules and regulations, we are required to retain all of our water on site, and let it discharge slow at a metered rate, so -- MR. CILIA: I understand, but that still causes, not a problem only for us, but for the people that you're building homes for. It's going to create a problem. They're going to get flooded also. MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, the finished floors are Packet Pg. 522 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 136 9A7 set at an elevation that's high enough that it won't be a problem. MS. MONTGOMERY: And, in fact, in January, the Standard Building Code was changed, wasn't it, to require another foot of (indiscernible)? MR. KOULOHERAS: Yes. The new finished floors are FEMA flood elevation plus one foot. MR. BROWN: Yeah, to answer your question. You know, all it's going to take is a big wave for most of Florida to be underwater. But in our Regal Acres community, the existing one, post hurricane, and I mean post, like next day, there was no flooding of the community itself. There was no water over roadways. The ground was certainly saturated. I will tell you that much, but the system, the way they design these systems, not that I'm an engineer, it's designed to accommodate a 100 -year flood. Now, what you've got to remember about this past hurricane season was interesting is two weeks before the hurricane, we had a 100 -year flood event. And so you had a 100 -year flood event, because we had those, like those six days of rain straight, and then you had the hurricane two weeks later. a Packet Pg. 523 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 137 9A7 But the design with the new communities is usually the restriction is so tight that all that water that falls within the property line has to be retained on-site, and then only goes out, off-site in the case of, you know -- well, let's put it this way. If it goes off-site like that, I'll probably be on the ark, because -- but to answer -- you have a valid point, but these communities are designed to -- MR. CILIA: The other thing that I would like to bring a point to is I understand you have an attorney here and everything else like that. We don't. We weren't told anything until the last second about this project going on, and it's been going on for how long? Five years, that you've been planning this? MR. KOULOHERAS: The actual design process of this community started roughly 12 months ago, eight months ago. MR. CILIA: Eight months? Okay. MR. KOULOHERAS: About eight months ago. And so a number of weeks ago, I forget exactly when, to be totally honest with you, I did speak at a Reflection Lakes HOA board meeting. We went and met with the folks at West Winds. We did not have a Packet Pg. 524 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 138 9A7 a community meeting with the folks at the Naples Preserve (sic). We did meet a couple of those folks who you heard talk tonight, but they were not in an official capacity for the community. MR. CILIA: Well, that was the personal problem between the people of Naples Reserve and the HOA of Naples Reserve, because for some reason they feel that they run the place, okay. They have to understand that the people of Naples Reserve are the HOA. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. MR. CILIA: We pay their salaries. Even though they're trying to tell us what to do, we still have the last say-so. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, so you're talking about the developer, yep. MR. CILIA: We should be in these meetings, not left aside and say, well, we have a board of directors. Well, we're paying for those board of directors. They should listen to us, okay. They shouldn't just go ahead and sign papers and give away this land with -- I don't say give it away, but what I'm trying to get at is we should be involved as owners of the HOA. These people are only workers. Packet Pg. 525 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 139 9A7 Don't get me wrong, okay? They try to do a decent job. I don't feel that they're looking out for our best benefit, and that's going against my own HOA. Because, I mean, there's a game going on here, and nobody's informing us. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Oh, yeah, yeah. No, and I can understand -- MR. CILIA: And you like start to feel like, you know, hey, somebody's trying to get over on me. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. Well, and I can understand your point completely, and of reaching out to Naples Preserve, I'll blame one person. I'll blame myself and myself only, because that's my job to do that, and I didn't go out there and meet with your HOA, the residents of your HOA. MR. CILIA: Well, tomorrow would be a great time to come because the owners of -- what is it, IA or -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. MR. CILIA: The people that own the land. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, iStar. MR. CILIA: iStar. They're all coming tomorrow. They're going to be running through the neighborhoods, seeing how everything is working Packet Pg. 526 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 140 9A7 out. For some reason, I just got this information a little while ago. That's why I got here late. I was talking to somebody who says, oh, the owner of iStar is going to be here tomorrow. They're trying to clean the place up, and all the workers were working till like 8:00 at night, you know, trying to straighten this place, you know. Half the palm trees are laying down on the ground. MR. KOULOHERAS: A publicly -traded company (indiscernible) yeah, that happened. MR. CILIA: But I think that would be a great time for you to come over. MR. KOULOHERAS: So I -- Don Meyer (phonetic) or Mayor (phonetic), him and I have talked from iStar, but to be honest, like I told Mike, who was sitting over here, I (indiscernible) certainly talk with Don, but, you know, as we continue these conversations, as you just pointed out, I'd much rather talk to the residents, because let's say this community gets approved and we move forward. The last thing that I certainly want to do, and we've been talking about walls and we've been talking about hedges and landscape and all that stuff, but the last thing I certainly want to do is a Packet Pg. 527 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 to go and spend tens, thousands, hundreds of thousands of dollars to develop something that I think is going to be good for you guys, for you guys to be just like, well, that doesn't work for US. MR. CILIA: Right. MR. KOULOHERAS: It's a waste of, you know, resources from Habitat's standpoint. It's a waste of time for you guys, so -- MR. CILIA: But if you look at the issue and everything else that's around you, okay, that's in the past, okay, you look at Bonita Springs, you look at Immokalee, the crime, you look at people on the news today, tonight, okay, somebody moved the guy's furniture. Found out it was an alligator in his backyard pushing his furniture up against the door and the guy couldn't get out of his own house. This is what your future is going to look like if you try to take all of these animals and put them into one space. You're forcing them to come live with us. MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah, and -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: You still have another -- MR. KOULOHERAS: Oh, I'm sorry. Okay. Packet Pg. 528 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 142 9A7 MR. CILIA: Go ahead. I'm sorry. MR. KOULOHERAS: We can certainly talk to you later, maybe. MR. CILIA: Okay. MR. SUSSMAN: Okay. My name is Bill Sussman (phonetic). I'm new to the area. I'm in Naples Reserve. I'm trying to get a handle on all this. I have a feeling that it's already a fait accompli and this is a dog and pony show. But fundamental question, why are we not building on land that's already been zoned residential? Why are we taking away what had been zoned as preserve, number one? Number two, what's the impact on our taxes? People have to be accommodated with services, with education. The school has to be expanded. I'm going to stop. Just one observation. I drove down Greenway because I don't know my way around here. I took a look at the existing community. What I observed was that about half of these homes have four or five cars in their driveway. Four or five cars in a driveway? Some of the homes were well-maintained and some were not at all Packet Pg. 529 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 143 9A7 maintained. That's it. MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, thank you. And I hope to answer some of your questions. As far as the property's concerned, the property is currently zoned agricultural. Most of Collier County, over the history of time, was zoned agriculture. Why do we not build on already zoned property? I will tell you right now, if I had an option to build on zoned property that had entitlements on it, I would take that option every single day of the week. Unfortunately, those options, in Collier County, as they currently sit, are few and far between -- there aren't many of them. And the ones that do exist, the prices are so expensive. There's one that just sold in north Vanderbilt and 951. I believe the number was somewhere around 6 or $7 million. It was listed for 10, for 116 homes. That's what they were zoned for. So in order for that developer to make a profit, they might have to turn out homes inside that community for somewhere north of $600,000. So that obviously does not work for Habitat. So I would agree, if there was land out there Packet Pg. 530 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 144 9A7 that was zoned, that's the first stuff that we try to go after if we can afford it, but most property in Collier County is zoned ag. All the surrounding communities around this Regal Acres, Naples Reserve, Reflection Lakes, those were all zoned agricultural lands before those developers came in and rezoned them to RPUDs. So don't disagree as far as where to build the property identified, but that's just kind of, as someone that's personally been in Collier County now for about 17 years, it's just the MO. I know it's not a great answer, but -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What's the impact on the taxes? (Indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: So the impact on taxes. Thank you. So, if you're -- first of all, if you're -- there's the homestead laws and all those other things if you're a full-time -- if your domicile is here in Collier County. But the mantra in Collier County has typically been growth pays for growth. So we talked about impact fees. That $27,000 impact fee that I told you I just wrote a check for, $8,000 or so of that was for schools. a Packet Pg. 531 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 145 9A7 An additional $6,000 of it was for sewer and water, and another 6,000 was roughly for the roadway network. So when you folks bought your home, you paid an impact fee. Whether you knew it or not, that was part of your sales price. And so as far as the tax burden of future communities, the design of Collier County, the way it governs itself, is really that there's no additional tax burden to the existing taxpayer. Will taxes go up over time? I know they're proposing a one cent sales tax that's going on the docket, I believe, this fall, but that is primarily, if you looked at that legislation locally, that is primarily to fund roadway projects out in the eastern lands of Collier County where they're expecting growth, but they don't have the revenue from the impact fees to pay for it yet. So the tax implication for this community of 116 homes having -- on Collier County is -- is it zero? Yeah, I'd say it's zero. I will tell you this. Every one of the residents inside this community is going to be paying taxes. So if there's an issue where that becomes where you have to pay for it, they're going L v a a� d M M ti r O 0 0 0 N J a N G D a 0 m A 2 ca CL m c m E M V 2 a Packet Pg. 532 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 146 9A7 to be footing the bill with you, but like I said, that's typically -- I wish Commissioner Fiala was still here, because she'd probably tell you, typically, growth pays for growth. That's the way they have set it up in Collier County. Did I answer your question the best I could? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Thank you. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: As a politician, could things change? MR. KOULOHERAS: Are you calling me a politician? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: You seem to have (indiscernible) . MR. KOULOHERAS: I think that's an insult, but -- (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: What I'm trying to get at is the Habitat for Humanity, okay, are homes for people who have children, and really can't afford a nice place, you know, to raise their children. Now, in New York, if you own a home, and I don't have any children living with me, they have what they call a star program, where you pay less Packet Pg. 533 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 147 9A7 tax on your property than the person who does have children, because that -- 95 percent of the taxes in New York go to schools. MR. KOULOHERAS: And I don't -- to answer your question, I mean, so I'm not a politician -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: That's why you're not answering it. MR. KOULOHERAS: (Indiscernible) Usually, I defer to staff on those types of questions, but, you know, could something change? Absolutely. But I don't believe anything like that exists in Collier County. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I know it never will either, probably. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. KOULOHERAS: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) education in Florida. MS. MONTGOMERY: Do we have any other questions? MR. KOULOHERAS: I will say this, if I could just close, if we don't have any questions. I do appreciate the folks that stayed around as long as you have to hear the whole story. I know some folks probably had other commitments and Packet Pg. 534 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 148 9A7 that's fine. But I do appreciate the folks that sat here in those, I'm sure, very comfortable pews for the past couple hours, however long we've been here. Are there any other questions? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: No. We thank you. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: We thank you for showing. MR. KOULOHERAS: Well, in that case, thank you very much for your time. I truly appreciate it. (Recording concluded.) Packet Pg. 535 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 149 9A7 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I, Joyce B. Howell, do hereby certify that: 1. The foregoing pages numbered 1 through 148 contain a full, true and correct transcript of proceedings in the above -entitled matter, transcribed by me to the best of my knowledge and ability from the digital recording provided by the court. 2. I am not counsel for, related to, or employed by any of the parties in the above -entitled cause. 3. I am not financially or otherwise interested in the outcome of this case. 4. I am an approved transcriber for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court. SIGNED AND CERTIFIED: Da e: J June 12, 2018 Packet Pg. 536 9.A.7 From: Lynn Livingston [mailto:redwingnutl@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2018 8:12 PM To: Nick Kouloheras <nkouloheras@habitatcollier.org> Subject: Regal Acres II Dear Mr. Kouloheras, Thank you for recently speaking at our Reflection Lakes Meeting. My family is strongly opposed to any expansion of the Habitat for Humanity development called Regal Acres, which we understand will be called Regal Acres II. The current community called Regal Acres is an eyesore. 80% of the community has homes that are not well-maintained and yards that are worse. Some of the homes have 3-4 cars in the driveway, even during working hours. These are supposed to be single family homes but obviously have extended families that have moved in. Even now, we can hear the noise and loud partying at night from existing Habitat homes. Teenagers from Regal Acres have been coming along the canal and trespassing on Reflection Lakes private property on several different occasions. We have seen groups of 3-8 teenagers run through our and our neighbors' yards. Then they usually head down Sonoma Blvd to US41. Having more Habitat homes only 150 feet from the east side of Reflection Lakes will be a horrible eyesore, more noise and possible increase in trespassing. Thank you for bringing this to the neighborhood information meeting on June 4th. Aubrey & Judy Livingston 14587 Manchester Dr r a Packet Pg. 537 June 4, 2018 Robert and Cathy Martin 14566 Manchester Dr. Naples, FL 34114 To Whom it may concern, We are opposed to the rezoning of the Habitat for Humanity property from farming to residential. This proposal would hurt environmentally the preserve area currently home to a herd of deer, 8-10, at least one black bear and we think we have heard a panther during the night. We are also against this proposal as the noise is currently loud and the teenagers walk through the preserve to come around our lakes creating a hazard and a liability for us. Sincerely, Robert L. Martin i Cath . Martin 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 538 a� L V Q TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Q Packet Pg. 539 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) REZONE APRIL 2018 Prepared for: • ' • Habitat for Humanity' 11145 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34113 Prepared by: ENGINEERING 2350 Stanford Court Naples, Florida 34112 (239)280-4321 EB 642 20170078-000 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 540 STATEMENT OF CERTIFICATION I certify that this TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Joshua J. Hildebrand, P.E. PTOE Florida License No. 73952 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2122 Johnson Street Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Collaborators: Leah M. Holmes, E.I. Zachary L. Stone, E.I. Joshua J. Hildebrand, P.E., PTOE Florida License No. 73952 Date 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 541 9.A.7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.......................................................................................... 1 3.0 AREA CONDITION.......................................................................................................... 5 FDOT Traffic Online Count Stations 3.1 Site Access.............................................................................................................. 5 Excerpt from Collier County 2017 AUIR 3.2 Surrounding Roadway Network............................................................................. 5 Bi -Directional Traffic Counts 3.3 Committed Improvements...................................................................................... 5 4.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC..................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Site Traffic.............................................................................................................. 5 5.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION....................................................................................................... 6 6.0 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION.................................................................................... 10 6.1 Bi -Directional Traffic Counts............................................................................... 10 6.2 Intersection Turning Movement Counts............................................................... 10 7.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS..................................................................................................... 10 7.1 Capacity................................................................................................................ 10 7.2 Turn Lane Analysis............................................................................................... 11 8.0 IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS........................................................................................ 12 9.0 CONCLUSIONS...............................................................................................................13 APPENDICES Appendix A Amended Developer Contribution Agreement Appendix B Traffic Impact Study Methodology Statement Appendix C ITE Trip Generation Appendix D FDOT Traffic Online Count Stations Appendix E Excerpt from Collier County 2017 AUIR Appendix F Bi -Directional Traffic Counts Appendix G Turning Movement Counts r a -i- Packet Pg. 542 FIGURES Figure 2-1 Project Location Map Figure 2-2 Net New Area of Influence Map Figure 5-1 Net New % Project Distributions Figure 5-2 Net New A.M. Peak Hour Project Trips Figure 5-3 Net New P.M. Peak Hour Project Trips TABLES Table 4-1 ITE Trip Generation Maximum Allowed Summary for the Proposed Development Table 5-1 A.M. Peak Hour Trip Assignment Table 5-2 P.M. Peak Hour Trip Assignment Table 7-1 Capacity Analysis 9.A.7 a Packet Pg. 543 REGAL ACRES PARCEL B �-- Habitat RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE for Humanity TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this traffic analysis is to assess the potential transportation impacts associated with the PUD rezone for the proposed development of Regal Acres Parcel B. The applicant is requesting a zoning change from the Rural Agricultural (A) and Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning districts to the RPUD zoning district for the project to be known as the Regal Acres II RPUD. The proposed request will add 23.15 acres of property and a maximum of 116 residential dwelling units to the existing Regal Acres Parcel A RPUD, a 184 unit residential development situated on 36.75 acres on the west side of Greenway Road in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East. This request will also include consideration and approval of an affordable housing density bonus agreement authorizing the developer to utilize affordable housing bonus density units in the development and the repeal of Ordinance No. 05-36. The Regal Acres RPUD is a project comprised of two (2) separate development parcels delineated on the PUD Master Plan as Parcels "A" and "B". Parcel "A" is approximately 36.75 acres and is built -out with 184 multi -family dwelling units, accessory recreational facilities, and supportive infrastructure. Parcel `B" is approximately 23.15 acres and will develop as a residential community with a maximum of 116 dwelling units. This report documents the estimated traffic impacts resulting from a total site build -out of Parcel B on 23.15 acres of property consisting of 116 residential units. Also, the development is in the US 41 developers consortium for the US 41 widening and intersection improvements at the CR 951 and US 41 intersection. These improvements consist of intersection improvements at the intersection of CR 951 and US 41, six -lane road improvements from the intersection of CR 951 and US 41 to Henderson Creek, and four -lane road improvements from Henderson Creek to 0.25 miles east of Naples Reserve Blvd, please see Appendix A for a copy of the developers agreement. Additionally, a methodology statement outlining the parameters of the study is provided in Appendix B. 2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The project includes 23.15 acres of community and housing to be added on to the 36.75 acres of existing property with an anticipated build out year of 2022. The project is located on a parcel of land in Collier County off of Greenway Road (see Figure 2-1). The project study limits were determined based on the 2%,2%, 3% rule in accordance with Collier County's TIS Guidelines and Procedures (Resolution No. 2006-299). As defined by Collier County, the significantly impacted links and intersections are defined as: • Trips distributed on links directly accessed by the project where the project traffic by direction is equal to or exceeds 2% of the peak hour service volume for the adopted LOS standard. APRIL 2018 -1- 9.A.7 EN G1 Packet Pg. 544 �-- Habitat for REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY • Trips on one link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project where the project traffic by direction is equal to or greater than 2% the peak hour service volume for the adopted LOS standard. • Trips on all subsequent links where the project traffic by direction is equal to or greater than 3% the peak hour service volume for the adopted LOS standard. Figure 2-2 depicts the project location and area of influence as determined by these guidelines. APRIL 2018 -2- 9.A.7 EN G1 Packet Pg. 545 9.A.7 REGAL ACRES PARCEL B Habitat RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE for Humanity TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY isu�r. 400t _- '^ EXISTING SITE ACCESS It 10 74 ;amu ` - 4PA "� 1 71 ' 1 a i •a a _. ii" t .4 _- E0 `WI01 REGAL ACRES PROJECT FIGURE ENGINEERING PARCEL B LOCATION MAP 2-1 Figure 2-1: Project Location Map a APRIL 2018 -3- E N G I 3- ENGI Packet Pg. 546 REGAL ACRES PARCEL B �-- Habitat RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE for Humanity TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PARCEL B PARCEL A O INK LU w F,9 SJ. LEGEND AREA OF INFLUENCE ��mqoam REGAL ACRES AREA OF INFLUENCE FIGURE ENGINEERING PARCEL Z_Z APRIL 2018 Figure 2-2: Net New Area of Influence Map -4- 9.A.7 EN G1 Packet Pg. 547 �-- Habitat for 3.0 AREA CONDITION 3.1 Site Access REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY An existing site access to Regal Acres Parcel A is located off Greenway Road and will serve as the site access to Regal Acres Parcel B. 3.2 Surrounding Roadway Network Greenway Located east of the project site, Greenway Road is a north -south two lane undivided local roadway with a 30 mph posted speed limit. Greenway Road terminates at Tamiami Trail East to the south and at a residential community to the north. Tamiami Trial East South of the project site, Tamiami Trail East is a north -south four lane divided arterial with a 60 mph posted speed limit. 3.3 Committed Improvements There are currently no committed improvements at this time. 4.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC 4.1 Site Traffic The maximum allowable A.M. peak hour, P.M. peak hour, and daily trip generations for the project were estimated using trip generation rates obtained from the ITE Trip Generation (Ninth Edition). The ITE trip generation estimates are summarized in Table 4-1 and included in Appendix C. Table 4-1: ITE Trip Generation Maximum Allowed Summary for the Proposed Development Rnroje"c 0 Dwelling W1. Peak '. ITE Land Use ---]— — Daily Units In Out Total in OutFTotal Existing Regal Acres ITE LUC 230 - Multi - Family(') 184 100 21 121 81 40 121 808 Parcel A Proposed Regal Acres ITE LUC 210 - Single Family House (2) 116 23 68 91 76 44 120 1,204 Parcel B Total Trips 123 89 212 157 84 241 2,012 Total Net New Parcel B Trips 23 68 91 76 44 120 1,204 Footnotes: (1) ITE Trip Generation from Existing Regal Acres PPL Traffic Impact Statement Regal Acres prepared by Vanasse & Daylor LLP dated April 3, 2008 (2) ITE LUC 210 Single Family Home, ITE Trip Generation Standard Equations APRIL 2018 -5- 9.A.7 . s. LN G1 Packet Pg. 548 REGAL ACRES PARCEL B �-- Habitat RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE for Humanity TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Proposed Regal Acres Parcel B LUC 210 ITE Equations: AM: T=0.70(X)+9.74; PM: Ln(T)=0.90Ln(X)+0.51; Daily: Ln(T)=0.92Ln(X)+2.72 5.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The net new project trip distributions were estimated from existing traffic patterns of the surrounding roadway network and logical assumptions based on the FDOT Traffic Online Count Stations 0005 and 0194 (see Appendix D). The distributions based on these conditions are depicted in Figure 5-1. In conjunction with the traffic data from the Florida Traffic Online, the 2017 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) (see Appendix E) was utilized to estimate traffic distributions and the capacity for each of the segments to be analyzed in this report. Based on the trip distributions, the project's A.M. and P.M. peak hour estimated traffic volumes were assigned to the surrounding road network and are shown in Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3. This analysis is provided for the purpose of assessing the peak hour and peak direction Level of Service (LOS) on the roads directly serving the project site. Results are shown in Table 5-1 and Table 5- 2. Footnote: (1) 2017 Collier County AUIR Footnote: (1) 2017 Collier County AUIR APRIL 2018 - 6 - 9.A.7 . s. EN G1 Packet Pg. 549 9.A.7 REGAL ACRES PARCEL B �-- Habitat RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE for Humanity TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PARCEL B V 1 7/7/ V ,q 7 ARCEL A (0%z 0% 0 (40%) 7 40% (60%) 7 60% EXISTING PROJECT DISTRIBUTIONS XX INGRESS (XX) EGRESS (100%)7 100 LQ w a QO a T 441 f� F 72% 9ST 28% MM\"'h"ql REGAL ACRES NET NEW % PROJECT FIGURE PARCEL B DISTRIBUTIONS 5_1 ENGINEERING Figure 5-1: Net New % Project Distributions APRIL 2018 - 7 - • :� EN GI Packet Pg. 550 (72%) (28%) 72% T <� L a T 441 f� F 72% 9ST 28% MM\"'h"ql REGAL ACRES NET NEW % PROJECT FIGURE PARCEL B DISTRIBUTIONS 5_1 ENGINEERING Figure 5-1: Net New % Project Distributions APRIL 2018 - 7 - • :� EN GI Packet Pg. 550 9.A.7 REGAL ACRES PARCEL B �-- Habitat RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE for Humanity TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PARCEL B (81) TOTAL EXISTING + NET NEW 83 A.M. PEAK HOUR PARCEL A 17 (49) (19) (49) �q� f �q f� Fq s�. LEGEND 17� 6 XX INGRESS (XX) EGRESS (19) .REGAL ACRES NET NEW FIGURE r`2Fr A.M. PEAK HOUR ENGINEERING PARCELS PROJECT TRIPS 5-2 Figure 5-2: Net New A.M. Peak Hour Project Trips to L U d M M ti r O O O r O N J a N G D a cfl m rn �L ca CL m m E V 2 a APRIL 2018 - 8 - EN G1 Packet Pg. 551 9.A.7 REGAL ACRES PARCEL B Habitat RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE for HumanityTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PARCEL 8 (16) 32 (b8) TOTAL EXISTING + NET NEW 125 P.M. PEAK HOUR PARCEL A (44) 76 / (44) 76 O 55 (32) (32) (12) T9� .1 -ll ffj �,9f1 Fq Sl. LEGEND 55� 21 XX INGRESS (XX) EGRESS •REGAL ACRES NET NEW FIGURE mkzv P.M. PEAK HOUR E N G I N E E R I N G PARCEL 8 PROJECT TRIPS 5-3 Figure 5-3: Net New P.M. Peak Hour Project Trips a APRIL 2018 -9- I 9 - Packet Pg. 552 REGAL ACRES PARCEL B �-- Habitat RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE for Humanity TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 6.0 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION To establish base existing traffic volumes and trip distributions on Greenway Road data was obtained from the sources listed herein. 6.1 Bi -Directional Traffic Counts From April 9, 2018 to April 12, 2018, two sets of 24-hour bi-directional data collectors were placed on Greenway Road, just south of Majestic Circle and just north of Kingdom Court. The primary purpose of these counts was to document the southbound through movements at the intersection of Majestic Circle and Greenway Road. Appendix A documents the findings of the preliminary traffic counts (see Appendix F). 6.2 Intersection Turning Movement Counts Turning movement counts were recorded on April 10, 2018 from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. (see Appendix G). The counts were performed by Johnson Engineering at the following private entrances on Greenway Road: • Greenway Road at the Synegenta Seeds Inc. entrance • Greenway Road at Majestic Circle • Greenway Road at Kingdom Court 7.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 7.1 Capacity As demonstrated in Table 6-1 of this report and in accordance with Collier County Concurrency Management rules, future roadway conditions will accommodate the proposed project traffic at the 5 -year horizon. Capacity analysis was performed by projecting the 2017 peak hour peak direction volume for each link to the 2022 project horizon year using growth rates from historical FDOT counts. Historical traffic counts reflected a growth rate lower than 2%, therefore a 2% minimum growth rate was utilized. Peak direction peak hour project generated trips were then added to the 2022 background directional volumes. The 2022 projected background plus project generated trips was then subtracted from the directional service volume to yield the remaining trips. APRIL 2018 -10- 9.A.7 EN G1 Packet Pg. 553 REGAL ACRES PARCEL B �-- Habitat RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE for Humanity TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Footnotes: (1) 2017 Collier County AUIR (2) 2% Minimum Used Based on Florida Traffic Online Historical Counts 7.2 Turn Lane Analysis Per the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Public Right-of- Way, i hg tof- Way, left turn lanes are required on two lane roads when the peak hour left turning movement is greater than 20 vehicles. Right turn lanes are required on two lane roads when the right turning movement is greater than 40 vehicles during the peak hour. On multilane roads, left turn lanes are required at all median openings and right turn lanes are required at all driveways. Both the existing and future anticipated number of left turning movements at Greenway Road and the project's entrance at Majestic Circle exceed the turning movement thresholds per Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3. The Regal Acres project boundary lies toward the northern terminus of Greenway Road along with the Naples Reserve Community and Synegenta Seeds Inc. The Naples Reserve Transportation Impact Study dated February 13, 2012, estimated 125 p.m. peak outbound trips from the Naples Reserve development onto Greenway Road at the development build -out. During April 10, 2018 p.m. peak hour turning movement counts collected by Johnson Engineering, Inc., two (2) outbound construction vehicles were observed from the Naples Reserve development. The p.m. peak outbound trips from Synegenta Seeds Inc., and Kingdom Court onto Greenway Road was 25 trips. Based on the location of the existing Majestic Circle entrance in relation to the Greenway Road northern terminus, the existing Greenway Road right-of-way constraints, and the lack of applicant owned property on either side of Greenway Road, a waiver to not require a left turn lane at from Greenway Road onto Majestic Circle and to not provide compensating right-of-way are being requested as part of the Regal Acres Parcel B RPUD rezoning request. APRIL 2018 -11- 9.A.7 EN G1 Packet Pg. 554 �-- Habitat for REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 8.0 IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS As depicted in Table 6-1, all significantly impacted roadway links are anticipated to provide an acceptable LOS at project build -out as set forth in the Collier County AUIR. As discussed in section 7.2, the anticipated traffic distributions meet the minimum warrants for turn lanes as specified in the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Public Right -of -Way, however based on the location of the existing Majestic Circle entrance in relation to the Greenway Road northern terminus, the existing Greenway Road right-of-way constraints, and the lack of applicant owned property on either side of Greenway Road, a waiver to not require a left turn lane at from Greenway Road onto Majestic Circle and to not provide compensating right-of-way are being requested as part of the Regal Acres Parcel B RPUD rezoning request. APRIL 2018 -12- 9.A.7 EN G1 Packet Pg. 555 �-- Habitat for 9.0 CONCLUSIONS REGAL ACRES PARCEL B RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The following conclusions have been based on the analyses in this traffic study: 1. The project will generate an estimated net new 91 A.M. peak hour trips, 120 P.M. peak hour trips, and 1,204 daily trips. 2. All roadway segments surrounding the project site are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS at project build -out. No additional roadway improvements are recommended. 3. Per the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Public Right -of -Way, left turn lanes are required on two lane roads when the peak hour left turning movement is greater than 20 vehicles. Right turn lanes are required on two lane roads when the right turning movement is greater than 40 vehicles during the peak hour. On multilane roads, left turn lanes are required at all median openings and right turn lanes are required at all driveways. Both the existing and future anticipated number of left turning movements at Greenway Road and the project's entrance at Majestic Circle exceed the turning movement thresholds per Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3. The Regal Acres project boundary lies toward the northern terminus of Greenway Road along with the Naples Reserve Community and Synegenta Seeds Inc. The Naples Reserve Transportation Impact Study dated February 13, 2012, estimated 125 p.m. peak outbound trips from the Naples Reserve development onto Greenway Road at the development build -out. During April 10, 2018 p.m. peak hour turning movement counts collected by Johnson Engineering, Inc., two (2) outbound construction vehicles were observed from the Naples Reserve development. The p.m. peak outbound trips from Synegenta Seeds Inc., and Kingdom Court onto Greenway Road was 25 trips. Based on the location of the existing Majestic Circle entrance in relation to the Greenway Road northern terminus, the existing Greenway Road right-of-way constraints, and the lack of applicant owned property on either side of Greenway Road, a waiver to not require a left turn lane from Greenway Road onto Majestic Circle and to not provide compensating right- of-way are being requested as part of this rezoning. APRIL 2018 -13- 9.A.7 EN G1 Packet Pg. 556 9.A.7 APPENDIX A L AMENDED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT a r a Packet Pg. 557 AMENDED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT US 41 DEVELOPERS CONSORTIUM THIS AMENDED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION., AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is made and entered into this -1Z,"\ of Kl b 2008, to be effective as of the date upon which this Agreement is approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County (the "Effective Date"), by and among NAPLES RESERVE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (the "Reserve"), KITE EAGLE CREEK II, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, KRG EAGLE CREEK IV , LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, KRG 951 & 41, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, TOUSA HOMES, INC., a Florida corporation, ABC LIQUORS, INC., a Florida corporation, NBC RV, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, NBC LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, REALTYNET REAL ESTATE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC., a Florida non-profit corporation, each a "Developer" and, collectively, the "Consortium Developers" or the "Consortium") and COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ..(hereinafter referred to as "County"), and hereby amends, restates, supercedes, and replaces ih it entirety- ..that certain "Developer Contribution Agreement -US 41 Developers' Consortium dated November 13, 2007, recorded November 16, 2007, in Official Records Book, at Page 2349 of the, Official Records of Collier County, Florida. All capitalized terms not de fined -rein shall have I t4e same meaning as set forth in the Collier County Canso idatkl'r-%Jct Fe Ordinance, Ordinance No. 2001-13, as amended. a WHEREAS, the Cons6rtium Developers h r control portions of the development projects (each a "Ovblopment" and col 'e&i .. ly, a "Developments"), identified graphically in Exhibit "A" and byllegal. descriptions in Exhibit "B" and located in unincorporated Collier County, Florida; and WHEREAS, LDC Section 10,02.07.C.4. provides that "Upon approval by the Board of County Commissioners, any applicant shall enter into an enforceable development agreement with Collier County pursuant to the provisions of F.S. §§ 163.3220--163.3242 or other agreement acceptable to the Board of County Commissioners, in conjunction with the approval of a development order and/or a certificate of public facility adequacy. The effect of the development agreement shall be to bind the parties pursuant to the terms and conditions of the development agreement and the certificate of public facility adequacy in order to insure that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed development concurrent with when the impacts of the development occur on the public facilities;" and 9.A.7 N d �d o M m � M w Cr r+ ro O �C o A O cs r J ,p a o D " a gn ara acv N C's C �L �• a rQ 3 ra M o� c m E ao a Packet Pg. 558 OR: 4408 M 2$$1 WHEREAS, on November 13, 2007, the County and most of the Consortium Developers entered into a Developer Contribution Agreement in which each Developer was to be granted vested concurrency rights with respect to the Development owned or controlled by it, in exchange for the Consortium Developers fully funding, at their sole cost and expense, the design, permitting, construction, Construction -Engineering and Inspection (CEI), and land acquisition for a Road Project consisting of (1) at grade intersection improvements at the intersection of CR Route 951 and SR Route 41, (2) six -lane road improvements from the intersection of CR Route 951 and SR Route 41 to Henderson Creek, and (3) four -lane road improvements from Henderson Creek to 0.25 miles east of Naples Reserve Blvd; and. WHEREAS, because of recent changes in economic circumstances, the Consortium Developers are unable to meet their obligations under the November 13, 2007 agreement; and WHEREAS, the County has continued to evaluate various options, including at grade improvement at the intersection of US41 and SR-CR951 that would also be the footprint for the ultimate grade separated improvement (See exhibits 1 "at grade" and 2 "grade separated"). The estimated cost for the "at grade" improvement, which includes right of way is approximately $18,700,000 and project contingency.qi_ unt. of $3,$22;003.55 for a total of $22,522,003.65. The ultimate "grade separated" improvement is estimated -at an additional $35,300,000. This intersection is identified in thy' "ty's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) as grade separated; and j' / ---•--ti ____�,� � � WHEREAS, the County is- wil} ng t i.. ement in order to help fund and accelerate the improvement pf N`s ter K io ; d WHEREAS, the Trahspdrtation Administrator of e County has recommended to the Board of County ComrnissioijerS'that the improvemen", set forth in this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "Proposed Plai") rs..in the conformity With 'the' contemplated improvements and additions to the County's transportation network; and WHEREAS, after reasoned consideration. by the Board of County Commissioners, the Board finds and reaffirms that: a. The Proposed Plan is in conformity with the contemplated improvements and additions to the County's transportation system; b. The Proposed Plan, viewed in conjunction with other existing or other proposed plans, including those from other developers, will not adversely impact the cash flow or liquidity of the County's road impact fee trust accounts in such a way as to frustrate or interfere with other planned or ongoing growth -necessitated capital improvements and additions to the County's transportation system; and C. The Proposed Plan is consistent with both the public interest and with the comprehensive plan, the Long Range Transportation Plan and complies with the requirements of the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance. -2- Packet Pg. 559 OR, 4408 PG; 2882 WITNESSETH NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars (10.00) and other good and valuable consideration exchanged amongst the parties, and in consideration of the covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. All of the above RECITALS are true and correct and are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference as if set forth fully below. 2. The County agrees that it will provide a PD&E reevaluation, design, permit, acquire all necessary right-of-way and construct at grade improvement at the intersection of US41 and SR-CR951 that would also be .the footprint for the ultimate grade separated improvement (the "Project"). The. County will identify the Project within the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) fisc�ar .2013. If the Project is ready for construction in fiscal 2012, the County will accelerate the Project accordingly. It is understood by all parties that the Project is subject to FDOT approval and requires an acceptance of the reevaluated PD&E and all permitting approvals. The Count/w4pur ue_e,41iiQ into a Local Agency Program (LAP) or Joint Participation Agreement (JP este' 3. Within thirty{ d s,aftek e� active a e, the Consortium Developers shall pay to the County in cash th; Fainof $3,000,000:00. The o 11 use these funds to proceed with a PD&E update, design; and right of way acquigti n o ,,project. Subject to paragraph 5, these funds are non-refundab eegardless of if and'w'h unty commences or completes this Project. 4. As set forth in Exhihit_kthe;%'_ a Schedule"), Developers shall pay County an additional $19,522,003.65 in Anticip-ted Road Impact Fees towards construction of the Project. Impact Fees must be paid in accordance with the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, however, each Developer shall be required to fully pay to the County its Anticipated Road Impact Fee Amount (or the applicable portion thereof) no later than the dates set forth in the Milestone Schedule. If Road Impact Fees are increased, then the amount to be paid shall be based on the then current road impact fee rate. Each Developer's actual payment for Road Impact Fees shall be credited against the Anticipated Road Impact Fee Amount. If Road Impact Fees are reduced, no credit will be granted against the Anticipated Road Impact Fee Amount for such reduction. Nothing contained herein or in the Milestone Schedule shall prohibit a Developer from paying its Anticipated Road Impact Fee Amount or portions thereof earlier than the dates set forth in the Milestone Schedule or prohibit a Developer from receiving certificates of occupancy, site development plan approvals, plat approvals or building permits in connection with such early payment. -3- Packet Pg. 560 OR: 4408 PG: 2883 5. As security for each Developer's payment of its Anticipated Road Impact Fee Amount, each Developer hereby agrees to submit to the County within ninety (90) days after the Effective Date, a payment bond, letter of credit or other payment security acceptable to and approved by the County in the amount of its Anticipated Road Impact Fee Amount totaling $19,522,003.65. This shall be in a form acceptable to the County. If the Consortium Developers fail to submit payment bonds, letters of credit, or other approved payment security totaling in the aggregate $19,522,003.65 prior to the expiration of said 90 -day period, the County shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, in which event, the $3,000,000-00 cash payment and any other cash payment made by a Developer shall be returned within thirty (30) days by the County to the Developer that paid the same, the payment bonds, letters of credit and other payment security (if applicable) that were submitted by the Consortium Developers shall be released within thirty (30) days by the County, this Agreement shall be null and void, and the parties shall be relieved from any and all further obligations hereunder which do not survive termination of this Agreement. If the Agreement is terminated no approvals shall be granted for any development that impacts US41 east of CR951 and SR951 south of US41. 6. This is a form of "Pqy Accordingly, following all of the Developer's submittal of cash ply R n". the payment tter of credit, or other approved payment security for its Anticipated'Road Impact Fee Amo t, applicable, (1) each Developer shall receive Road Impact Fear C the ❑-khticipat R ad Impact Fee Amount as set forth in Exhibit "C". A st' p e e t Fee f dgeT, utilized by the County to administer Road Impact F C e e aper is a 6 ed las Exhibit "D"; and (2) each Developer shall also receiv i ca f d `te Public Facilities ("Certificates") from the County which immediately est o est riiCp' sortium Developers with the right to roadway capacity in ection with their iv I elopments as set forth in the Milestone Schedule; and (3) eveloper's prof , titled to obtain certificates of occupancy, site development rovals, plat ap v and building permits for its Development (or portions thereo , linable) subject the normal permitting and review process. Issuance of these Certificates, dver,,_ will relieve the respective Developers from their respective obligation to pay road impactees for their respective units. The credit for Road Impact Fees identified herein shall run with each of the respective Developments and shall be reduced by the entire amount of each Road Impact Fee due for each Building Permit issued thereon until the respective Development project is either completed or the credits are exhausted or otherwise no longer available, or have been assigned by operation of or pursuant to an assignment agreement with County. The foregoing reduction in the Road Impact Fees shall be calculated based on the amount of the Road Impact Fees in effect at the time the Building Permit is issued. The credits set forth herein shall be applied solely to Road Impact Fees, and shall not offset, diminish or reduce any other charges, fees or other Impact Fees for which the respective Developer, its successors and assigns are responsible in connection with the development of their lands. It is expressly understood that the Impact Fee Credits will be utilized in the order in which the Building Permits are reviewed by the Impact Fee Administration, irrespective of whether Developer assigns all or part of the Development. The County will apply all road impact fees paid for any portion of the Development whether paid by the Developer or another developer towards the Anticipated Road Impact Fee Amount. -4- Packet Pg. 561 OR44 4408 PG; 288 7. If a Developer fails to pay its Anticipated Road Impact Fee Amount (or a portion thereof) as required herein and such failure continues for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice of such failure from the County, the County, as its sole remedy hereunder, (i) shall have the right to draw upon such defaulting Developer's letter of credit or exercise its rights under the payment bond or other approved payment security submitted by such defaulting Developer in order to fund such Developer's Anticipated Road Impact Fee Amount (or the applicable portion thereof then due and payable by the Developer) or (ii) for any unsecured payment the County shall terminate Road Impact Fee Credits, Certificates, and the right to obtain Certificates for the applicable portion thereunder that has not been paid by the Developer. In no event shall a default by one of the Consortium Developers of its obligations under this Agreement cause the other Consortium Developers to be in default of this Agreement. S. The County has determined that the Project is an interim improvement consistent with the FDOT PD&E that provides capacity for the Consortium Developers and already vested adjacent developments for a portion of the study area. Except as authorized in paragraph 11, no additional development approvals that directly impact this segment of US41 will be granted outside of this Agreement until the Project is completed unless otherwise approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Upon cornpletign-,of,? tie Project, the County shall evaluate the roadway capacity, background tr aid vested trips. to 'determine if any additional approvals may be granted. 9.. This Agreement hereby amends; restates, suMcedes, and replaces in it entirety that certain "Developer Contribution .Agreement -US -41 Developers' Consortium" dated November 13, 2007, recorded November 1'6'26. 07 '1 Oficial Records Book 4303 at Page 2349 of the Official Records of Col CI U4 >Iy�ri w L al Matte 10. This Agreement` shall not be construct fir characterized as a development agreement under the Florida Local Government -Development Agreement Act. 11. The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the parties to this Agreement. Upon giving written notice to the County, each Developer may assign all or part of the concurrency rights it receives under this Agreement utilizing the County's then current form of assignment. The Developer may also transfer or assign all or a portion of the approved density or square footage to another project on any immediately adjacent roadway link with the intersection of US41 with SR -CR 951 whether owned by that developer or owned by another developer. 12. Developer acknowledges that the failure of this Agreement to address any permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve either the applicant or owner or its successors or assigns, of the necessity of complying with any law, ordinance rule or regulation governing said permitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions. 13. In the event state or federal laws are enacted after the execution of this Agreement, which are applicable to and preclude in whole or in part the parties' compliance with the terms of this Agreement, then in such event this Agreement shall be modified or revoked as -5- Packet Pg. 562 OR: 4408 PO; 288 is necessary to comply with such laws, in a many which best reflects the intent of this Agreement. 14. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement shall only be amended by mutual written consent of the parties hereto or by their successors in interest. All notices and other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be sent by Certified Mail, return receipt requested, or by a nationally recognized overnight delivery service, and addressed to the parties at the addresses set forth in Schedule I to this Agreement, or such other address of which a party hereto shall give notice. Notice shall be deemed to have been given on the next successive business day to the date of the courier, if sent by nationally recognized overnight delivery service, or if delivered by Certified Mail, upon actual receipt. 15. Each Developer shall execute this Agreement prior to it being submitted for approval by the Board of County Commissioners. This Agreement shall be recorded by the County in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, within fourteen (14) days after the Effective Date. Developers shall pay all costs of recording this Agreement. The County shall provide a copy of the recorded document to the Developers upon request. 16. In the event of any dispute under this .Agreement, the parties shall attempt to resolve such dispute first by me.ans':of the County's then -current Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure, if any. Following the conclusion of such procedure,`if any, either party may file an action for injunctive relief in the` Circuit.,: Court of Collier County to enforce the terms of this Agreement, and remedy being cumulat v..ith aTe9a :allother remedies available to the parties for the enforcement of the A;greommt. 17. This A eemgI e� � tom•1��.etween the County and the parties with respect to the activities noted herein and supepedes .and takes the place of any and all previous agreements entered into between the parties.., hereto relating to the transactions contemplated herein. All prior -representations, undertakings,` and agreements by or between the parties hereto with respect to the subject. matter-of—this. Agreement are merged into, and expressed in, this Agreement, and - any and. all priori representations, undertakings, and agreements by and between such parties with respect thereto hereby are canceled. 18. The individuals signing this Agreement on behalf of each party represents and warrants that he or she has the full power and authority to execute this Agreement for the party upon whose behalf he or she is executing same and that upon such execution, such party shall be fully bound by each and every provision of this Agreement. 19. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed or construed to create between or among any of the parties any joint venture or partnership nor otherwise grant to one another the right, authority or power to bind any other party hereto to any agreement whatsoever. 20. This Agreement may be executed in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. Packet Pg. 563 OR: 444$ PG: 288 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their appropriate officials, as of the date first above written. Attest: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk By: _ G u lerk Apprlalsuftcfencv: eed as to form and I ]ef re y BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA HENNING, �o `� rNE cIR 11ris Packet Pg. 564 OR. 4408 PG: 2887 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT US 41 DEVELOPERS CONSORTIUM WITNESSES: Printed Name Printed Name YO NAPLES RESER , a Florida limited liability co any Name: Title: F" `GL �-� t +�-� Y ►� `e�^.-�+�, of Gulf Coast NalAs erne, LLC, the Managing Member of NAPLES RESERvE, LLC STATE OF t ) COLTNTY OF - C (B �A Before, Notary Pt�\in and for said mud -j3' State, personally appeared the of Gulf Coast Naples Reserve, LEC, Managing Member;,6f:3ti1 -.REST, - , LLC, a Florida limited liability company, who acknowledged the execufic z of the; €�regoing instrument as such officer for and on behalf of said limited liability company. 4< Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this d day of 2008. POOSEMME B. YouW (sl ) * +ICY COYMISSM 100 480QE5 - Q EXPIRES: January B, 2010 'far n0 TAn 7 Senicee (printed name) Notary Public My Commission Expires: County of Residence: 11 r Packet Pg. 565 OR; 4448 PV. 2888 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT US 41 DEVELOPERS CONSORTIUM WITNESSES: Signature KITE EAGLE CREEK II, LLC, an Indiana limited lialili ompany By: Name: I h a.n P , — i L t-ry e.1- cAj ted Name Title: e c..:nrLlr7l r� of Kite Realty Group rust, the General Partner of Kite Realty Group, L.P., the tgna Managing Member of KITE EAGLE CREEK �u6zr� �] Sa /004► i I�CQ Printed Name' Dated: y- R0 62 u s STATE OF [NQ #j \}1 FI COUNTY OF mAfucri ) ,1 �R Before, a Notary Public 'in and for said Co urd State, personally appeared K. , the of Kite Realty Group Trust, the General Partner of bite Realty Group, the Managing Member of KITE EAGLE CREEK II, LLC, an Indiana limited liability _rant who acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument as such officer for and on behalf of said limited liability company. W' hand and Notarial Seal this day of QGt�ybW , 2008. ,0 n,4pNOTARY'-.y * s[attire} r SEAL A � r * L _ PUBLIC (printed name) y''•, DF IN��P�Notary Public My Commission Expires: County of Residence: NLJiAM Packet Pg. 566 OR; 4448 PG; 2889 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT US 41 DEVELOPERS CONSORTIUM U 1 1i�W ignature T L Frae1vct, P ' ed Name Z. //,/, Si a Ra a I-ar 4 j //Owe, Printed Name STATE OF COUNTY OF MA IMI KRG EAGLE CREEK IV, LLC, an Indiana limited liahili pany By: k -TitName: ` &�Oma 5--k- Title: le: C 4"4 of Kite Realty Group rust, the General Partner of Kite Realty Group, L.P., the Managing Member of KRG EAGLE CREEK 4V, LLCM C 01 Dated: 9—.-;L d V k P110, kyl Before, a Notary Pule` 'fir► and for said 'CouirtY, ''arid State, personally appeared " as lC- µorae`• , thb, . r o" Loi�" of Kite Realty Group Trust, the General Partner of Kite Realty,' -Group L. .; -the ;1Vlanaging Member of KRG EAGLE CREEK IV, LLC, an Indiana limited liability= -C— Ompany; who acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument as such officer for and on behalf of said limited liability company. Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this day of CftkvP-v" , 2008. NOTARY'.',"- SEAL OTARY "-SEAL =* - PUBLIC My ComOlggio&1E411res: sl a v ature) (printed name) Notary Public County of Residence: -10 mor MIL Packet Pg. 567 OR: 4448 PO: 284 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT US 41 DEVELOPERS CONSORTIUM WITNESSES: Cj- :T- - Sknature ;TA L F-Y-q6x cl, Printed Name ignature 4 ka4- 1 G. sc) �d Printed Name STATE OF it4wo j4 COUNTY OF AAAOiOrJ KRG 951 & 41, LLC, an Indiana limited liability corpWy By: Name: TtIt+'►'icts k. mr i7Aw r� 1. Title: ; e �. �' rc, of Kite Realty Group trust, the General Partner of Kite Realty Group, L.P., the Managing Member of KRG 951 & 41, ®--. Dated: ;L y— a aDe Before, a Notary Pufffe', in and for said tbiifit� -Ibd State, personally appeared -t�Vft*S r, Iu c6aNft , the ,cam 40 4 Kite Realty Group Trust, the General Partner of Kite Realty Grvupb'L..P.' the ,nagirig Member of KRG 951 & 41, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company; ikh ackrt wledged the execution of the foregoing instrument as such officer for and on behalf of said limited liability company. wit hand and Notarial Seal this day of &yb6oY , 2008. R._ Rq Y` NOTARY .9yi (si aFure} SEAL x * PUBLIC * - (printed name) Notary Public krrrrr ru n u u NNF My Commission Expires: County of Residence: -I1- Packet Pg. 568 WITNESSES: 10, Signature OR: 4408 P0. 2891 SIGNATURE PAGE TO U.S. 41 DEVELOPER CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT Signature { �[ a Printed Name STATE OF 5:1.W t COUNTY OF �Zt G� oco TOUSA HOMES, I ca .� Florida Title: Dated: 1 (4Zp C?y Pt Cptj Before, a Notary P'Ak in and for said,u ty, State, personally appeared .uu-rites Lr - of TOUSA HOMES, INC., a Florida corporation, who ack wWdged the executio `14/1 e foregoing instrument as such officer for and on behalf of said limiteyd I-� i� ��d E C Witness my hand and Notarial Seal thiday of 0406r) , 2008. ti. i`J CA (signature) My Commission Expires: 1C+ 23 2c09 112241449.1 sh Q, C�- �A L" ) C"rcA (printed name) Notary Public County of Residence: 1rH=m M WARD MyCD Uw0M r wMw w 1e MRft txm A MM loft � sra�as �yrM„�.h,wrwo.an� Packet Pg. 569 OR; 4448 PG: 289 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT US 41 DEVELOPERS CONSORTIUM WITNESSES: Signature Obin C. �iur Printed Name I' 0� Si e ,1JIF� Printed NAtne :1r:74Il 01=051t� COUNTY OF ABC LiQuoRs, INC., a Florida corporation By:..�_r. Name: Title: 11—e -K Dated: a :72 Laos C� Before, a Notary Pu'in and for said -CbujhPQ � State, personally appeared ESS .a4►/" s , thi�� _ �1��5.r>�,c _ of ABC LiQuoRs, INC., a Florida corporation, who acknowledged tYie exeeul'o - f6e foregoing instrument as such officer for and on behalf of said limited liability stij�n' 1� Witness my hand and N �ea 3 day of QWXer , 2008. Ik�y Pdblc Blrar d Fbddr 7t77= -- (signature) (prirffed name) Notary Public My Commission Expires: County of Residence: -13- Packet Pg. 570 OR: 4448 PG: 2893 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT US 41 DEVELOPERS CONSORTIUM WITNESSES: Signator Printed Name q hot ue, UL� Signature �.�-Au6l") E HLle-LAI2 Printed Name 0� STATE OF COUNTY OF Before, a Notary Pubii and Florida limited liability company W'66 ac as such t V , far and on behalf sof NBC RV, LLC, a Florida limited liability company By: Name: Ve , Title: (1 r Dated: �1 L)- Qc� - 0-& - - R C06, for said `Cbuhtyr-4O State, personally appeared nQ G, n� 'CLl e_scilo of NBC RV, LLC, a i ndwlzdged. the . execution of the foregoing instrument Said. Fitt%ice& 1n�� Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this j3eiday of ('fib of , 2048. (si e) r'� --s - "-, O A (printed name) Notary Public My Commission Expires: County of Residence: Itj - Lk - 1O \vALr ,.y. uu��r J. � Nary P&* - Sw d F� Qndlft bPbu 0024, B GadrYlo� i OD 5114 -14- 17- 14 - Nollry Ate. 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 571 OR. 4408 PG; 289 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT US 41 DEVELOPERS CONSORTIUM WITNESSES: Signature - Printed Name NBC LAND HOLnrnGs, LLC, a Florida limited liability compare By: Name:_ 0s, Title:dnr,�L /�Iem her Dated: I0 --93-o& STATE OF T-1 �uo) COUNTY OF Before, a Notary Public in and for said Co �ia[d State, personally appeared �(e,)Ik. A. `P , the 'of NBC LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, a Florida limited liability co*pany, w o acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument as such r for and on behal`##16-id"'l. v,.. Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this 'W day of QcVo�nz,,, 2008. 12 signature) My Commission Expires: 10 -;)y- kQ> uu� 3. eE►am Wary PW* ftb jhq C E>ift °dOX cowWoom 0 DD 561W Bonded 9y NSI NoWlAWL (printed name) Notary Public County of Residence: -15- Packet Pg. 572 OR: 4408 PG; 2895 SIGNATURE PAGE TO U.S. 41 DEVELOPER CONSORTWM AGREEMENT VATNESSES: Signature Printed Name Signature ilrk 7� td<�%^ j LA Primed Name STATE OF COUNTY OF Before, a Notary Title: —Dated---_. C7 d in and for said ZVI State, personally appeared of REALTYNET READ ESTATE, LLC, a Florida iitnit ' ility company, who =acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument as such ofce�'r a�Pn behalf of said limited liability company. Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this day of T , 2008. My Commission Expires: (signature) (printed name) Notary Public County of Residence: 112241449.1 Packet Pg. 573 OR: 4408 PG: 289 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of S G n r On 0 C �-o �r .3j._"0019 _ before me, 1C ccs', n e. pe l y -e -r Gate Here Insert Name and Tine of the MOW personally appeared C.04E, Name(s) of Signer{*] who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose namek)&are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he helthey executed the same in hi /thbir authorized capacity(il*}, and that by(R ewJtheir signature(*) on the instrument the personN, or the entity upon behalf of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ acted, executed the instrument. C61IN Amm #I TptpVC/ �Y 1 certify uiFc � � C°�D"of the State .,r,,� _ �°.�"ti...t'j/ 0 --Aand coi Place Notary Seal Above Though the information below is n6t*quired by law, it may prove and could prevent traudul oval and reattachment Description of Attached Docume �� . 5 Title or Type of Document: IF TY OF PERJURY under the laws iia that the foregoing paragraph is )fficial seal.. r9 --l— of Notary Pudic ting on the document document. Document Date: 1 D � 'i✓ 3 k0 % _ Number of Pages: Signer{s} Other Than Named Above: ^'A v l V, e 1_--- Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: C o r" !�-,, M ckk\ 4p— El ❑ Individual Cf Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited L 1 General _ C Attorney in Fact ■ ❑ Trustee Top of thumb here ❑ Guardian or Conservator Or Other: Q . Q r•A-r Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: Individual LJ Corporate Officer — Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited —_ General L J Attorney in Fact ::j Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGHTTHUMBPRINT OF SIGNER 020117 Naboraf Notary Association - 93W De Sala AVe PC Box 24M-ChaF.Swarth, CA 81313.2402- www. NationalNotary.org Wn 105907 Reorder: Cap To"ree 1 X876-68tV Packet Pg. 574 OR; 4448 PO; 2897 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT US 41 DEVELOPERS CONSORTIUM WITNESSES: ignature Printed Name L. Signa l e E e_ n ry �p �f1 Cil J Printed Name ��% STATE OF /` ICt" COUNTY OF 't HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INc., a Florida Non -Profit Corporation By: Name: Samuel .Durso, MD. Title: President Dated: ,R cou. Before, a Notary Public' -and for said County'ihdl Slat' *rsonally appeared Samuel J. Durso, MD., the President of H.ABITATSOR HUMANITY•OF,,C6LLIER COUNTY, INc., a Florida Non -Profit Corporation , who acknowledged the. exooirtioii,of the foregoing instrument as such officer for and on behalf of said limited 1i 1�iIiji cQr t a ty: Witness my hand and No ' Seal this � day of �,�� 2008. LISA B. LEFKOW :r MYcassias * ooraa�o s'gnature) a,as iL vi/ (printed name) Notary Public My Commission Expires: County of Residence: Packet Pg. 575 Naples Reserve, LLC Attn: Anthony Salce 3415 Radio Road, #109 Naples, FL 34104 Kite Eagle Creek II, LLC c/o Kite Realty Group Attn: Eric Strickland 30 South Meridian, Suite 1100 Indianapolis, IN 46204 KRG 951 & 41, LLC c/o Kite Realty Group Attn: Eric Strickland 30 South Meridian, Suite Indianapolis, IN 46204 OR; 4448 PO; 2898 SCHEDULE I Notice Addresses With a Copy to: Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson Attn: Richard Yovanovich, Esq. 4001 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL 34103 With a Copy to: Kite Realty Group Attn: Robert G. Solloway, Esq. 30 South Meridian, Suite 1100 Indianapolis, IN 46204 With a Copy to: Kite Realty Group Attn: Robert G. Solloway, Esq. �� South Meridian, Suite 1100 1100 , Ihdianavolis. IN 46204 c KRG Eagle Creek IV, LLC '- c/o Kite Realty Group Attn: Eric Strickland 30 South Meridian, Suite 11 Indianapolis, IN 46204 TGUSA Homes, Inc. 4000 Hollywood Blvd., Ste. 500-N Hollywood, FL 33021 NBC RV, LLC c/o Basik Development, LLC Attn: Keith Basik 720 Goodlette Rd., #305 Naples, FL 34102 a Copy to: Kite Realty Group -Atte: Robert G.. Solloway, Esq. �i'10. S Guth Meridian, Suite 1100 . ndi r polis„ IN 46204 C 1✓i it , Inc. Attn-. "i om Hartmann ��P.C3: Bok 593688 -TSE CA,- Orlando, FL 32859 Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc Attn: Samuel J. Durso 1145 Tamiarni Trail East Naples, FL 34113 -18- NBC Land Holdings, LLC c/o Basik Development, LLC Attn: Keith Basik 720 Goodlette Rd., #305 Naples, FL 34102 RealtyNet Real Estate, LLC Attn: Cory Maile 1334 Forrest Court Marco Island, FL 34145 Packet Pg. 576 9.A.7 a Packet Pg. 577 OR: 4408 PG: 2900 Exhibit "B" Legal Description for Naples Reserve_ LLC Section 1, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida Legal Description for ABC Liquors Inc. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTH WEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEA57FCORNER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 , RANGE 21 FLORIDA, THENCE RUN, GREES 23' 51 THE NORTHWEST QUAR � - F SAID SEsa FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTER Y �_ HT 951 (C.R.. 951); THENt'ANCE E S RIGHT OF WAY LINE,fU A T F 81 BEGINNING OF THE PF` NQ FiEREII DEGREES 20'16" E FORIST OF 439 . DEGREES 39'44"W FOOF 190.1 DEGREES 20'16" W FSANCE OF 151 DEGREES 12'01" E FOR A DISE OF 24._x! DEGREES 33'42" W FOR A DISTANCE OFC2Q`1. DEGREES 40'36"E FOR A DISTANCE OF"1-&.22 DEGREES 19'24" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 73.S THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF COLLIER COUNTY '►ANG THE NORTH LINE OF V 3, FOR A# DISTANCE OF 324.27 )F WAY :LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 40'08":� ', ALONG SAID EASTERLY 7.72AET TO THE POINT OF I DESCR BED; THENCE RUN S 54 )5FEET- 7r�jENCE RUN S35 � fE1ENCE RUN N 54 f ; THENCE RUN N 02 (HENCE RUN N 54 !v fET; THENCE RUN N 35 FEET; THENCE RUN N 54 z FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 951; THENCE RUN N 35 DEGREES 40'08" E, ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 148.39 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN. Packet Pg. 578 OR; 4408 RG: 2901 Exhibit B Legal Description_ for KRG 951 & 41 LLC A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT "O.S.-3" OF TRAIL RIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 44 AT PAGES 71 THROUGH 77 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN NORTH 89055'57" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "O.S.-3", FOR A DISTANCE OF 867.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 3620 AT PAGES 2872 THROUGH 2876 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE RUN SDUTHF.04a09`46'`ST,.ALONG THE WEST LINE OF. SAID LANDS FOR A DISTANCE O0 163.91 FETA • NCE RUN SOUTH 02028'03" WEST, ALONG SAID LANDS FOR A DISTANCE ❑. FEET TO THE NORTH ERLYMOSTWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT " ' 0 \SAID TRAIL RIDGE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 02030'29" WEST, ALON& E WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT "C FOR A DISTANCE OF 1® FEET ENPE RUN NORTH 90000'00" WEST, ALONG THE NORTHEF 0 AID CT !'C FOR A DISTANCE OF 100.09 FEET TO A POINT QN'T EAST I GHT-OF-VN UNE OF STATE ROAD #951 (RIGHT-OF-WAY VARIES); THENCE RUN NOR 02°30'29" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCEF 140.20 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 04012'04" EAST,'ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 640.85 FEET,RUN SO FT 89042'14" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 264.66 FEET; THE UPV NORTH 15042'49" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 320.41 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 3599144" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD Na. 90 (TAMIAMI TRAIL 200.00 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY); THENCE RUN SOUTH 54020'16" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,927.32 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 35039'44" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 400,04 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF TRAIL RIDGE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 44 AT PAGES 71 THROUGH 77 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN NORTH 54020'16" WEST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRAIL RIDGE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 855.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED, CONTAINING 24.575 ACRES, MORE OR LESS Packet Pg. 579 OR, 4408 PG, 2902 Exhibit B LSgpl Descri tion for Kite gale Creek II LLC A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN PART BEING LOTS 3 AND 4 OF CAPRI COMMERCIAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 31, PAGES 52 AND 53 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND IN PART BEING PORTIONS OF TRACTS M-1 AND M-2 OF CRYSTAL LAKE TERRACES AT EAGLE CREEK AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 16, PAGES 30 AND 31 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCE ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF "CAPRI COMMERCIAL CENTER" AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 31 PAGE& 53 AND THE NORTHWESTERLY CORN ER .OF'"LT 2 CAPRI -C MMERCIAL CENTER REPLAT' AS RECORDED IN PLATx,35, PAGE 85 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLO�FOR A POINT OF..BEGINNING. FROM SAID POINT RUN SOUTH 35039'28" WE�f ALONG THEW STERLY INE OF SAID "CAPRI COMMERCIAL CENTER" ANB""'LO , � CAPRI COMMEROAL CENTER REPLAT', A DISTANCE OF 272.94 FE T7 TfiElsbUT'IWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID "LOT 2 CAPRI COMMERCIAL RREPLAY; ..,-kNCE RUN S H 54020132" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERV, NE OF SAID "LOT 2 CAPRI MMERCIAL CENTER REPLAN', A DISTANCE O .g 1.00 FEET TO THE SOUt6&STERLY CORNER OF SAID "LOT 2 CAPRI COMMERCIAL CENTER REP ' T ENCE RUN NORTH 35°39'28" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLYLt, IN]' "LOT 2 CAPRI . COMMERCIAL CENTER REPLAN', A DIST) F'23.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY -LINE OF LOT 1 OF SAID "CAPRI COMMERCIAL CENTER"'; THENCE RUN SOUTH 54020'32" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 226.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE RUN NORTH 35039'28" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 165.15 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 31°38'24" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 43.40 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF LOT 5 OF SAID "CAPRI COMMERCIAL CENTER"; THENCE RUN SOUTH 04013'24" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 3 00.0 5 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID "CAPRI COMMERCIAL CENTER"; THENCE RUN SOUTH 87°29'51" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 0.19 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD NO. 951, COLLIER BOULEVARD, AS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER OF TAKING AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2630, PAGE 2773 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 04010'08" WEST ALONG Packet Pg. 580 OR; 4408 PG, 2903 SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 136.65 TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2699, PAGE 792; THENCE RUN NORTH 85102'55" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 226.52 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3344, PAGE 260 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 04057'05" WEST ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE AND THE WEST LINE OF SAID PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2699, PAGE 792, A DISTANCE OF 78.24 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 35°39'28" WEST ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3344, PAGE 264 AND SAID WEST LINE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2699, PAGE 792, A DISTANCE OF 33.43 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 54020'32" EAST ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3344, PAGE 260 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2699, PAGE 792, A DI5TANCE OF 175.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE O - ID BOUW LINE OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL R BOOK 33 ;gip E 260 AND SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE R PROPERTY DESC IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2699, PAGE 792, D`CLJRVE BEING ANCA E NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33010'23" AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTAN=RNY UT "0055'44" EAST, 28.55 FEET, RESPECTIVELY; THENCE ; UN LONG SAID URVE, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.95 FEET THS- POINT OF TANGENCrOF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN SOUTH'55" EAST ALONG SAIL BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIB IN OFFICIAL RECORDS B000344, PAGE 264 AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE O ,SAID, PROPERTY DESCRIrc IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2699, PAGE 792, AN NG�iE,.S..OUTH LA. F THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BY THE ORDER Oi'T-AlIC RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2605, PAGE 3232 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 68.63 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE OF SAID BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3344, PAGE 260 AND SAID PROPERTY DESCRIBED BY THE ORDER OF TAKING AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2605, PAGE 3232, SAID CURVE BEING CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12059'48" AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF NORTH 85059'11" EAST, 11.32 FEET, RESPECTIVELY; THENCE RUN EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 11.34 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 951, COLLIER BOULEVARD; THENCE RUN SOUTH 0405705" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 33441 PAGE 260, A DISTANCE OF 75.88 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE BEING CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22008'22" AND A Packet Pg. 581 OR: 4408 PG: 2904 CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF NORTH 65010'10" WEST, 38.40 FEET, RESPECTIVELY; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3344, PAGE 260, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 38.64 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE BEING CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 62.04 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21053'50" AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF NORTH 6501726" WEST, 23.55 FEET, RESPECTIVELY; THENCE RUN WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3344, PAGE 260, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 23.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN NORTH 54020'32" WEST ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3344, PAGE 260, A DISTANCE OF 236.49 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 02029'06" WEST ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 33441 PAGE 260, A DISTANCE OF 174.68 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF "CRYSTAL LAKE TERRACES AT EAGLER€}�P T' AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 28, PAGES 72 THROUGH 74 OF SAID ULPI -RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN NORTH S4°20' 'i�NEST ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PROPERTY AS DESCRIBE IN `QFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3344, PAGE 260 AND THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID "CRYSTAL LAKE TERRACES AT GLE CREE ; A DISTANCE OF 1052.44 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 5°9'28" , A DISTANCbbFi 100.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH $0°00'15 F�,ST,'DIS ANCE OF 63:7 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 35039'2$" EAST, A DI CE OF 260,11 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 54020'32" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 33.46 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 35139'2$" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 360.81 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 54015'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 26.69 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 35°44'_42"��T, A DISTANCE OF 34.06 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WI� SRID: SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41; THENCE RUN SOUTH 5412032" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 374.76 FEET TO THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 646,291 SQUARE FEET OR 14.84 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. Packet Pg. 582 OR: 4408 PG: 290 Exhibit B Lggal Description for KRG Eagle Creek IV LLC BEING A PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (THE SHOPS AT EAGLE CREEK PAD #5 DESCRIPTION) ALL THAT PART OF SAID SECTION 3, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE EASTERLYMOST CORNER OF THE PLAT OF THE SHOPS AT EAGLE CREEK, UNIT ONE, ACCORDING TO PLAT BOOK 25, PAGES 44 THROUGH 45, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIT- (U.S. 41) SOUTH 54024'32" EW L8�.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CON-pi.UE AL NG -SAID. RI LINE SOUTH 54020'32" EAST 193.09 FEEL. THENCE LEAVINGt-OF-WAY LINE SOUTH 35039'28" WEST 123.00 FEET; THENC}'hORTH 5_4020'32" WEST 193.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35039'28" EAST 123.(00 FEET TO THE POINT)DF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.55 ACRES MORE; Pg LESS BEING 23,749 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT T q EASEMEANbRESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PLAT OF THE SHOPS AT EAGLE CREEK, UNIT ONE, BEING SOUTH 54020'32" EAST. L to . PIN number 00726724107 Legal 3 51 26 COMM AT NE CNR TR M-1, N87DEG W 248.62FT, NO2DEG E 271.35FT, NO2DEG E 35.84FT, S54DEG E 236.49FT, ELY 23.70FT, ALG ARC OF CURVE 2 TT OF REVERSE CURVE, ELY 38.64FT, SO4DEG W 154.42FT TO PDB. Packet Pg. 583 OR: 4408 PG; 2906 Exhibit B Lggal Description for NBC RV, LLC PARCEL -F" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2947, PAGE 386) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST LYING NORTH OF U.S. 41, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT. S]T BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST SECTION LINE OF SE QI 18, TOWNSHIP j SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST. COLLIER COUN TY FLORIDA` AND THE NORTH HT -OF -WAY LINE OF U.S. 41,THENCE N.00032'17" E. A DISTANCE OF 704.02 ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, TO THE POI F BEGINNING THENCE N.89026'36"W, A DISTANCE OF 303.51 FEET RlFfT-OF- WAY OF BASIK ROAD.; THENCE N.00033'23 "E., 1;� NCE OF 7J.86 BEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVES LEFT. HAVING: A RADIUS OF 360.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30°0�6'''1�49", A CHORD BEARING OF ',14°30'01"W AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 187 FEET; THENCE ,ALONG TH IARC OF SAID CURVE:, AN ARC LENGTH OF 1801 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE:; THENCE N.29033"26 "W., aA_DISTANC OF 50.76 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE: TO THE RIGHT. HAVING A RADIUS 0f 40.00 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24020'0 1, A CHORD BEARING OF N.17023"27"W AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 16.86 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE:, AN ARC LENGTH OF 16.99 FEET TO THE POINT. OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE: TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 54.00 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 111049'11", A CHORD BEARING OF N.61007'11"W. AND A CHORD LENGTH of 82.82 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE:, AN ARC LENGTH OF 97.58 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE:; THENCE N.0003021"E.. A DISTANCE OF 2203.66 FEET, THENCE S.88015'58"E., A DISTANCE OF 456.89 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE S.00032'17"W, A DISTANCE OF 2550.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 25.7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Packet Pg. 584 OR; 4408 PG: 290 LESS THE_ FOLLOWING. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (A PORTION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2947, PAGE 386) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE EA5 T 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 78, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST LYING NORTH OF U.S. 4 1, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT. SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST SECTION LINE OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST. COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA AND THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. 41; THENCE N. 00'32.17 E., ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 18, 704.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF 1i1E-HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE N. 8976'36" W" 303.51 FEET;�W- N. 00'33R3 " E., 15.00 FEET; THENCE S. 89'26'36" E., 303.51 FEETEAST LINE- THE AFOREMENTIONED SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 5 , RANGE 27 EAST, THENCE S. 00'32'17" W ALONG SAID EAST SECTIONILINE; 15-00 ffETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 4,553 SQU4K F BEARINGS BASED ON MUST SECTION. LINE M SECTI SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, OLLIER COUNTY, FLOD AS 7, TOTAL ACREAGE: 25.6 A , MORE OR LESS )N 18, TOWNSHIP 51 BEING N. 00'32'17" E. Packet Pg. 585 OR: 4408 FG: 2908 Exhibit S 1 gMriptigns fpr NBC Land H Idin s LL LEGAL.OESCRIPTEON PARCEL "1" BEING A PART OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 51, SOUTH RANGE 27 FAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA. THENCE NORTH 88004'41" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION A DISTANCE OF 657.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE LEAVING SAID SECTION LINE SOUTH 00029'48" WEST A DISTANCE OF 968.59 FF ' THENCE NQ�TH 88008'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 328.61 FEET; - N ;-NVOkTH 009'24" EAST A DISTANCE OF 969.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION NCE SOUTH 88004'41" EAST ALONG SAID SECTION LINE A DISTANCE OF 328.74 EET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID HEREIN: i i( i CONTAINING 7.3 ACRES MORE OR LESS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AN X:'\ BEARINGS BASED ON THE N6RT'H41NE OF SI TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST,(CCPLI FLORIDA, AS BEING NORTH 88004'41"-ES7, *fndustrial/AG Parcel VATIONS OF RECORD. :1'18, COUNTY, LEGAL DESCRIPTION NAPLES BIG CYPRESS LAND CONDOMINIUM - UNIT B A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE SOUTH 00032'17" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, A DISTANCE OF Packet Pg. 586 OR: 4408 PG 4- 2909 681.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88016'01" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 456.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00030'21" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 995.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 0003021" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 643.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89029'39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET THENCE NORTH 00030'21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 603.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 891129'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 120,636 SQUARE FEET OR 2.77 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND/OR RESERVATIONS OF RECORD. BEARINGS BASED ON THE EAST LINE SECTION 18, TOWNNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS BEING SOUTH 00'32'17 WEST. *Industrial Parcel AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAR EL `E' �r1 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING OF SECTION 18, TOWNSH CO) CSU/0 SU IN THE EAST 1/2 ❑F T}E �i45i 51 SOUTH. RANGE -27 E T/. 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 LYING NORTH OF U.S. 41, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING MOM PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: T C Iv,C COMMENCING AT A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST SECTION LINE OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. 41, THENCE N.00032 '17"E. A DISTANCE OF 704.02 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, THENCE N.89°26'36"W. A DISTANCE OF 303.51 FEET TO THE EAST .RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BASIK ROAD.; THENCE N00033'23"E. A DISTANCE OF 75.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE: TO THE LEFT; HAVING A RADIUS OF 360.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30006'49", A CHORD BEARING OF N.14°30'01"W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 187.04 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE. AN ARC LENGTH OF 189.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE; THENCE N.29033'26"W., A DISTANCE OF 50.76 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE: TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 40.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24070'0", A CHORD BEARING OF N.17023"27"W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 16.86 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE. AN ARC LENGTH OF 16.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF Packet Pg. 587 OR; 4408 PG, 2910 REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.04 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 111049'11 ", A CHORD BEARING OF N.61007'111W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 82.82 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AN ARC LENGTH OF 97.58 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE N.00030'21"E., A DISTANCE OF 7.96 FEET; THENCE N. 00030 21"E., A DISTANCE OF 1600.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N.89029'39"W. A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE N.00030 21"E. A DISTANCE OF 600.00 FEET; THENCE S. 88015'58"E. A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEE, THENCE S. 00030'21"W A DISTANCE OF 595.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 2.74 ACRES MORE OR LESS *Industrial Parcel co Pa rcei 1: Commencing at the Southea c nor bf 2, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County Florida, then alondAhe East line of said Section 12. North 00011'20" East 27 15 feet to the Ea114 corner said Section 12; thence continue along sa��st line of 5ectio>CI:12,.�Nd 0027'50" East 894.35 feet; thence North $9056'5° -`'West, 443.00 feet for a�Pjace of Beginning; thence North 89056'55" West, 475.53 f hence_ North,,.Qd°34'06" East, 490.97 feet; thence South 89°56'55" East, 4eet; thence South 00027'50" West, 490.97 feet to the Place of Beginning; being in the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County Florida. AND Parcel 2; Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, thence along the East line of said Section 12, North 40011'20" East, 2743.15 feet to the East 114 corner of said Section 12; thence continue along said East line of Section 12, on a gearing of North 00027'50" East, 894.35 feet to a set tack; thence run North 89056'55" West for 918.53 feet to a set iron pin with survey cap #LS 4273 which is the Point of Beginning; thence run North 89056'55" West for 443.98 feet to the West line of the Southeast '14 of the Northeast 1I4 of said Section 12 which is marked by a set 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 588 OR. 4408 FG; 2911 iron pin with Survey Cap #LS 4273; thence along said West line run North 00034'06" East for 490.98 feet to the North line of the southeast '14 of the Northeast 114 of said Section 12 which is marked by a iron pipe with Survey Cap #LS 4273; thence along said North line run South 89056'55" East, 443.00 feet to a set iron pin with Survey Cap #LS 4273; thence South 00026'50" West for 490.08 feet to the Point of Beginning; being in the Southeast t14 of the Northeast 114 of Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East Collier County Florida. AND Parcel 3: TOGETHER WITH A Non-exclusive access easement for the benefit of Parcel 1 over and across the Southerly thirty (30) feet of the following described property: Commencing at the Southeastof S pact � Township 51 south Range 26 East, Collier Count, Flori�ce along hast line of said Section 12, North 00°11'20" East, 273c,ee to the East '14 comer of said Section 12; thence continue along said line of Sectio 12, No�th�0°27'50" East, 894.35 feet for a Place of Beginning; thence North 8 056'55"Wept, 443.00 feet; thence North 00034'06" East, 490.97 feet; thence S u - . 89 '55" East, 443.00 feet to the East line of sais S( tion 1(2; thence along, sai line; of Section 12 South 00°27'50" West 490.9 feet to -the Place of Begi g; Being in the Southeast quarter of the Northeaifiparter of Section 12 To ns $1 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Floridan AND File Number 1302-5-1164 The West 1/2of the East 1/2of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1I4 of the Northeast 710 of Section 12, Township 51, South, Range 26 East excepting the North 30 feet thereof, which is reserved for road purposes, and The East 'Iz of the East 712 of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 114 of the Northeast 710 of Section 12, Township 51, South, Range 26 East, excepting the North 30 feet thereof, which is reserved for road purposes, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Packet Pg. 589 OR: 4408 PG; 2912 Exhibit B Legal Descriptions for TQ USA Hames Inc REFLECTION LAKES AT NAPLES PHASE 3] A PORTION OF TRACT RD -4, REFLECTION LAKES AT NAPLES UNIT II (PHASE II & III), AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGES 33 THROUGH 42 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT RD -4, REFLECTION LAKES AT NAPLES UNIT II (PHASE II & III), AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 46 AT PAGES 33 THROUGH 42 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE RUN S.0003514"W. ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -4, FOR A DISTANCE OF X92 FEET; THENCE RUN N.89°24'45"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET T A- POINTON E BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -4; THENCE RUN .JN.00°35'14"E., ALO H BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -4, FOR A DISTANCE OF 531.75 FEET TO E BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CUR'&,�-CONCAVE T E UTHEAST; THENCE RUN NORTHEASTERLY, AL 1V O ,THE�OUNDAR SAID TRACT RD -4 AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID. URV TO TH RIG RAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, THROUGF � ENT L ANG `dF 96018'37", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 37.25 FEET BEARING OF N.48°44'33"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 42.02 FEET TO A POINT, EVERSE CURVE; THEN RUN EASTERLY, ALONG THE BOUNDARY AID TRACT RD -4 ANE,ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT,�kfAVING.A- _RADIUS q- F 430.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12059'11 -�--LADED BY -A CHORD OF 97.25 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.89035'450'E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 97.46 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 1.877 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Packet Pg. 590 OR; 4408 PG; 2913 REFLECTION LAKES AT NAPLES, PHASE 3 MULTI -FAMILY PARCELS TRACT MF -3 AND TRACT MF -4 OF REFLECTION LAKES AT NAPLES - UNIT II (PHASE II & III), ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 46 AT PAGES 33 THROUGH 42 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Il % REFLECTION LAKES AT NAPLES, PHASE 31 TRACT RD -5, REFLECTION LAKES AT NAPLES UNIT II (PHASE II & III), AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 46 AT PAGES 33 THROUGH 42 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:Q BEGIN AT THE NORTHW _4NER OF TRACT RD -5, REFLECTION LAKES AT NAPLES UNIT II (PHAiSE & III), AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 46 AT PAGES 33 THROUGH 42 OF'TFE PUB RECORDS Q COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN S.7604455 ��NG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -5, FOR A DISTANCE OF � 88 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAwcb6E? (CAVE TO T*_NORTH; THENCE RUN EASTERLY, ALONG THE OUNDARY OF SAID TRA RIS'AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 255.04 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE F 27°24'13", SU NDED BY A CHORD OF 120.80 FEET AT A BEARING 0�. ,-89°32'59"�A DISTANCE OF 121.96 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CUR1/E; THENCR 6N' ' I.75050'52"E., ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -5, FOR A^DISTANCE OF 212.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH; THENCE RUN EASTERLY, ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD- S AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 545.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09046'37", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 92.89 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.80°44'11"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 93.00 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.04022'31"E., ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -5, FOR A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, FROM WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.04022'31 "E., A DISTANCE OF 420.00 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -5 AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 420.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09045'37", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 71.58 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.80044'11"W.. FOR A DISTANCE OF 71.67 FEET TO THE END Packet Pg. 591 OR: 4408 PG: 29 OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.75150'52"W., ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -5, FOR A DISTANCE OF 212.75 FEET" TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTH; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -5 AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 380.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27024'13", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 180.02 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.89032'59"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 181.75 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN N.76°44'55"W., ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -5, FOR A DISTANCE OF 67.88 FEET; THENCE RUN N.13°15'05"E., ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -5, FOR A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 1.477 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF TRACT RD -3, REFLECTION LAKES AT NAPLES UNIT 11 (PHASE II & III), AS RECORDED. INT BOOK 46 AT PAGES 33 THROUGH 42 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF`, LLIF R COUNTY, IDA, BEING MORE ' PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED LLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHW CMET RD- , REFLECTION LAKES AT NAPLES UNIT II (PH Ili), ASS CORDED IN PLAT BOOK 46 AT PAGES 33 THROUGH 42E UBLIC ORDS F (OLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUNT 1'7"E., ALONG THEBOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -3, FOR A DISTANCE OF 157.50 FEET; THENCE RUN S.76044'55"E., ALONG THE BQUNDARY; �§A1D TRACT RD-3;--FODISTANCE OF 19.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNINI0 TANGENTIAL CIRC CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST; THENCA SOUTH RL ESE , ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD-3_/AND ALARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; -THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 77020'09", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 31.24 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.38004'51 "E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.74 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.00135'14"W., ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -3, FOR A DISTANCE OF 239.42 FEET; THENCE RUN N.77°09'49"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 134.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -3, THE SAME BEING A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE WEST, FROM WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS N.64032'14"W., A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET THEREFROM; THENCE RUN NORTHERLY, ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -3 AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2405232", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 30.15 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.13°01 '30"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.39 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN N.001135'14"E., ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -3, FOR A DISTANCE OF 45.39 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A Packet Pg. 592 OR. 4408 PG: 29 TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE WEST, THENCE RUN NORTHERLY, ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT RD -3 AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 70.04 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44010'27", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 52.64 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.21 030'00"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 53.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 0.544 ACRE, MORE OR LESS. Packet Pg. 593 m M 9.A.7 E. hi4h C - MI*Mp ELho4u4a Ir„~ Fn" Anikgw%f RAYFIIG m l Roa lmpk Fw PW -1 3e "uM er — F« N. LLC I.LG LLL T— Mow alaM SL15liu1e • Mlkl tlW Reae 1 FCI F" Pe ni 1 R wLL l.,W. ,�F,Mkuw...fFd HWId, �+F.r HFF*. Rwww. IIRQ Mt �.1, LLC 2dlµ l,orFy VlcK-Fad. R C�FFu l LLC IiRQ f,iFF CrFM .1C+pwri.c Mk RY, iSC HCL LerG rbiWq,.IA[ CNr Lo1lfy [eaYr Ca . [q.GW i,-Mbm ■FW GwY i1RPFVy RMIIFrr, RM E.bb, i for Huer.ryM Hddr w Ru, ww no-.. FVQ M. LLC Ifila tqt aM.,. LLC TOOeA IIrwr Ye IIM. EM&C Tb C—h, ►410 LLC - C.r FR.F. ] . LFwv C.rr Flr. 3- w LI CaIF4 ■b11F C,..L M1 D—YW R iwM aF,.b,r,,..a R...rw FW RlI.F Ro-Mdlan lJn. a.re Odlei R.ba atiC Oa1FF my F,.,, be.ye>.1 F.- RaM . ..o-.n+w 4.u,..F b719e RCM�Fw 1 R9 ff y"Ofmtw ,FIV, ]p dar 6mFnwrrY EIMWw C� f f a]],e.7 n RI.F I T" 2.5]98rs f 1266792 S f 9 S 5 AWEkFr r SFp,i.rlF•r-SW SF iaS7.a2 P9.OwFiglea a'r.aYF iIM1Fre11 1 2A57...0. f SVv. D..M, LMe 170 1 1r i mSIF7M i mm b S Sk,* F2,e00 of bn Lwp! i1f,e1F.SS PFru M u 359 ,1 FIA pCrorF ev/,rsnE i 1,.2 r 70195 S i ww Y OFr ow a]5 : 115 ! S f WaEln]F. M 00. k�vyw' 52,afe W Pr w Fri aCMw i2b1R01f f 1..9i 3e3N f ! oms1 W.Q009F vMM VD.C..9, F., -MSF 13.M P. M.o00 LFuw va.90 04 Plr1LMV 7A00 21,QW FM F n MIwF ,Qnm,r i t 912,fe1 RS f - i M N I.lo0--ooa SF irr,l,re1 Pw,.0009F = i i tic FH.ai i 91950.110 1wEl9r�f RFtr1 i%.Wl Lm.o M f,e,3es.aQ Pr r-mv Frit a iMP'. I1n1f1P11 f , all ]a5 W f S M.Ml b.0e.mU iry,lFiµ P ,.Mv br,i' frA9e 00 PR ,,0005E S 14., f f f r �� 11VFFry r 21,6]9 AS 00 PR,,M05F FviF ridwF..A1Yn1 1 ,Itf.]ey pC i - f 1vq Vridvr• il'M Q1 Pr 1,Da06F 5 i f 91 e1000 i,NFFbr� a ,.eW cwr-1ar.a. il,ouaeziQ Ptr 1e*ew �— .rr - CF i+ry lfp, Qi11 S 1.111 Os9.W ! - f "F Fortis r r55 f f f r ! f o w 'TQfi R.na•D.Pe RV Pr, end iyL�tFr ryw✓<..CbnSYrP ..... ? ^1 � _ Fw F m F. o.ra. rrralr3F11 s a.Eu.001 ee E s for Hvrapweke.e l^Pauw,Mnw+ i 11.M6,11 / f., n.a9a 3 AN,MZI i r.9i1.5r5. a txe..H1 i w.—I i >!aF.9f..61 F fet,w. i Mow alaM SL15liu1e • Mlkl tlW Reae 1 FCI F" Pe ni 1 . •� • � RMIIFrr, RM E.bb, IIMaF, for Huer.ryM Hddr w Ru, LLC Ifila tqt aM.,. LLC TOOeA IIrwr Ye IIM. EM&C _- ws R LSC RRQEMMCF.MM. LLC - Vlc LLC. me R>t. LLC HrC L.M kFbriea, uL CoVlr CaIF4 LdW La bow "'771 1 ,FIV, ]p dar 6mFnwrrY EIMWw C� f f a]],e.7 n 2.5]98rs f 1266792 S f 9 S 5 AWEkFr r a'r.aYF iIM1Fre11 1 2A57...0. f i S 1 ZIPA'm 1 i mSIF7M i mm b S _ FIA pCrorF ev/,rsnE i 1,.2 r 70195 S i 1,Q.2, r 11 S S : i ! S f WaEln]F. Fri aCMw i2b1R01f f 1..9i 3e3N f ! 11031r11 FM F n MIwF ,Qnm,r i t 912,fe1 RS f - i 2,v 1,r 1, i = i i tic FH.ai i 91950.110 1wEl9r�f Frit a iMP'. I1n1f1P11 f , all ]a5 W f S 110 ,1'F1 f S 3 f f 91 iTo. 11VFFry r FviF ridwF..A1Yn1 1 ,Itf.]ey pC i - f tr0 ,f. r, f 5 i f 91 e1000 i,NFFbr� a .rr - CF i+ry lfp, Qi11 S 1.111 Os9.W ! - f 110 11 i1 f S f i ! 91 1000 fS16TA 1a w..b.. r - Fw F m F. o.ra. rrralr3F11 s a.Eu.001 ee E s - s s s - s i s s s arrre For 11e,mx E 11111e..Y s 9W.W." i 7a2,1.aN i r91. MI- 1 ui N1µ 1 •I,XF.bo, 1. Vt,.N..F..ydVtr P.1+^�Mwr F.wiuFbo^o-fM4 pprytryF]1F1d Vb PF9�V,L■ruA.FrwtrbFl FF.lCr�w.s o.nyw..e a2"ti LeWFo,W I,srsnl,�va.ar...wrvrFeFwFbPry PoF l.wevre.*wrr..rWrx>.,w,ny rlYrtrl4W'p r>+ia e9PwltF[�Ly�h. a Packet Pg. 594 *** OR: 440$ PG: 2917 f:011=31997 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT ROAD IMPACT FEE LEDGER Sample Impact fee ledger Beginning Balance Packet Pg. 595 9.A.7 APPENDIX B L TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY METHODOLOGY STATEMENT a r a Packet Pg. 596 9.A.7 APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: August 2, 2017 Time: N/A Location: N/A - Electronic Correspondence Via Email People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Growth Management Division / (239) 252-2361 2) Josh Hildebrand, P.E., Johnson Engineering / (239) 461-2481 3) Leah Holmes, E.I., Johnson Engineering / (239) 461-2445 Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title: Joshua J. Hildebrand, P.E., PTOE Transportation Engineer / Leah Holmes, E.I. Transportation Engineer Intern Organization: Johnson Engineering, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 2350 Stanford Court / Naples, FL 34112 / (239) 434-0333 Reviewer(s) Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer,ject Manager Organization & Telephone Number: Collier County Growth Management Department / (239) 252-2926 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Habitat for Humanity Address: 11145 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34113 Telephone Number: (239) 775-0036 Proposed Development: Name: Regal Acres II — PUD Rezone Location: Greenway Road, Naples Land Use Type: Residential ITE Code #: 210 Other: N/A Description: Request to rezone from Rural Agricultural (A) and Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning districts to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the Regal Acres II RPUD, to add lands to the existing RPUD for a maximum of 116 additional residential units on 23.15 acres of property; and, consideration and approval of an affordable housing density bonus Packet Pg. 597 agreement authorizing the developer to utilize affordable housing bonus density units in the development of this project located on the west side of Greenway Road, east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), and north of U.S. 41, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 05-36. Zoning Existing: Rural Agriculture (A) and Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Comprehensive plan recommendation: N/A Requested: The applicant is requesting a zoning change from the Rural Agricultural (A) and Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning districts to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the Regal Acres II RPUD. Findings of the PreliminarStudy: The estimated net new trips exceed 100 two-way peak hour trips, therefore this study qualifies as a Major TIS under the maximum allowable scenario. This TIS will include the A.M. and P.M. peak hour trip generations, as well as the associated trip distributions and project generated trips. The study limits will be determined based on the 2%, 2%, 3% rule in accordance with Collier County's TIS Guidelines and Procedures. Study Type: Major TIS X Study Area: Boundaries: See attached Project Location Map Horizon Year(s): 2022 Analysis Time Period(s): Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour F twe Off Site Developments: N/ Source of Trip Generation Rates: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (9th Edition) (See Attached) Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: NA Pass by trips: intemal trips (PUD): Transmit use: N/A Other-: NA � Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2022 Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: AUIR and FDOT Historic Traffic Information Site -trip generation: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE.) Trip Generation (9th Edition) (See attached) Trip distribution method: Manual Method Packet Pg. 598 Traffic assignment method: Manual Method Traffic growth rate: Determined from Historic Traffic Data provided in AUIR or 2% minimum Special Features: ffrom preliminary study or prior experience) A , eideats 1.,.,ations: TAT/ n Sight distanee: NA Queuing.: Access location & configuration: Regal Acres II will access Greenway Road via an existing entrance to Regal Acres. Traffic control: MUTCD Signal system loeation & progression needs: NA On site par -king needs: N/A Data Sources: Collier County AUIR and FDOT Historic Traffic Data Base maps: Prior study reports: PPL Traffic Impact Statement Regal Acres prepared by Vanasse & Daylor LLP, dated April 3, 2008 Access policy and jurisdiction: Collier County Review p . N/A SIGNATURES Joshua J. Hildebrand, P.E. PTOE Study Preparer(s) Reviewer(s) Applicant Leah M. Holmes. E.I. Packet Pg. 599 9.A.7 Jennifer Chrovian From: Joshua Hildebrand Sent: Friday, August 04, 2017 11:52 AM To: Jennifer Chrovian Subject: FW: Regal Acres II RPUD (PL#20170001733) - TIS Methodology Review Request From: SawyerMichael [mailto:MichaelSawyer@colliergov.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 2:47 PM To: Joshua Hildebrand <jjh@johnsoneng.com> Cc: BaluchStephen <StephenBaluch@colliergov.net>; Laura S. DeJohn <LKS@johnsoneng.com>; Leah M. Holmes <Imh@johnsoneng.com>; Jared R. Brown <jrb@johnsoneng.com> Subject: RE: Regal Acres II RPUD (PL#20170001733) - TIS Methodology Review Request Joshua, TIS outline looks good. The fee can be submitted with the petition application just provide a note on your cover sheet noting as such. Thanks, Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning, Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management 2685 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 252-2926 From: Joshua Hildebrand [mailto:iih@iohnsoneng.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 11:42 AM To: SawyerMichael <MichaelSawyer@colliergov.net> Cc: BaluchStephen <StephenBaluch@colliergov.net>; Laura S. DeJohn <LKS@iohnsoneng.com>; Leah M. Holmes <Imh@iohnsoneng.com>; Jared R. Brown <jrb@iohnsoneng.com> Subject: Regal Acres II RPUD (PL#20170001733) - TIS Methodology Review Request Michael, Attached for your review, please find the proposed TIS methodology for the Regal Acres II RPUD (PL#20170001733), located at 10291/10407 Majestic Cir., Naples FL 34114. Unless you feel there is reason to meet in person, we are okay with establishing the TIS requirements via electronic correspondence. A check in the amount of $500 is currently being processed for the methodology review fee. Thanks, Joshua Hildebrand, P.E., PTOE JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2122 Johnson Street Packet Pg. 600 9.A.7 Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Phone: (239) 461-2481 Fax: (239) 334-3661 Email: lih@iohnsonen.com Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 601 APPENDIX C ITE TRIP GENERATION 9.A.7 r a Packet Pg. 602 Project: New Project Day / Period Weekday Average Daily Trips Source : Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition Weekday AM Peak Hour of Generator Source : Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition Weekday AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Source : Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition Weekday PM Peak Hour of Generator Source : Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition Weekday PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Source : Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition Saturday Average Daily Trips Source : Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition Saturday Peak Hour of Generator Source : Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition Sunday Average Daily Trips Source : Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition Sunday Peak Hour of Generator Source : Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition Detailed Land Use Data For 116 Dwelling Units of SFHOUSE 1 ( 210 ) Single -Family Detached Housing Open Date: 7/26/2017 Analysis Date: 7/26/2017 Total Pass -By Avg Min Max Std Avg % % Use Trips Trips Rate Rate Rate Dev Size Enter Exit Eq. Equation 1204 0 9.52 4.31 21.85 3.7 198 50 50 True Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.72 93 0 0.77 0.33 2.27 0.91 180 26 74 True T = 0.70(X) + 12.12 91 0 0.75 0.33 2.27 0.9 194 25 75 True T = 0.70(X) + 9.74 122 0 1.02 0.42 2.98 1.05 174 64 36 True Ln(T) = 0.88 Ln(X) + 0.62 120 0 1 0.42 2.98 1.05 207 63 37 True Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51 1165 0 9.91 5.32 15.25 3.72 215 50 50 True Ln(T) = 0.93 Ln(X) + 2.64 112 0 0.93 0.5 1.75 0.99 215 54 46 True T = 0.89(X) + 8.77 1000 0 8.62 4.74 12.31 3.36 218 50 50 True T = 8.63(X) - 0.63 103 0 0.86 0.55 1.48 0.95 212 53 47 True Ln(T) = 0.91 Ln(X) + 0.31 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition, 2012 TRIP GENERATION 2014, TRAFFICWARE, LLC 9.A.7 1 Packet Pg. 603 9.A.7 APPENDIX D L FDOT TRAFFIC ONLINE COUNT STATIONS a r a Packet Pg. 604 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 605 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2016 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 03 - COLLIER SITE: 0194 - SR 90/US 41, SOUTHEAST OF SR 951 CC608 YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR ---- 2016 ---------- 15200 C ------------ E 7800 ------------ W 7400 ----------------- 9.00 -------- 57.40 8.50 2015 10900 S E 5400 W 5500 9.00 57.20 7.60 in 2014 10500 F E 5200 W 5300 9.00 56.50 7.60 2013 10300 C E 5100 W 5200 9.00 56.00 7.60 v Q 2012 9800 C E 5000 W 4800 9.00 56.20 6.90 2011 10700 F E 5600 W 5100 9.00 56.50 9.50 2010 10700 C E 5600 W 5100 10.32 56.59 9.50 2009 10700 C E 5600 W 5100 11.01 56.34 6.50 w 2008 10700 C E 5500 W 5200 11.12 56.68 7.80 M 2007 12100 C E 6000 W 6100 11.68 56.38 10.70 ti 2006 11200 C E 5700 W 5500 11.27 57.97 11.70 G 2005 11000 C E 5500 W 5500 11.40 54.70 13.10 2004 12100 C E 6100 W 6000 11.30 55.30 13.10 0 2003 10400 C E 5300 W 5100 11.30 54.00 15.20 c 2002 11600 C E 5800 W 5800 10.20 57.20 10.30 c14 2001 11700 C E 5800 W 5900 10.00 57.70 8.90 J a N O a co m L CR C Q 3 U m m C d AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE E S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE v V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN �p *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES Q Packet Pg. 605 9.A.7 Packet Pg.006 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2016 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 03 - COLLIER SITE: 0005 - SR 90/US 41, NORTHWEST OF CR 92 CC570 YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR ---- 2016 ---------- 6100 F ------------ E 3000 ------------ W 3100 ----------------- 9.50 -------- 57.40 9.10 2015 5900 C E 2900 W 3000 9.50 57.20 9.10 in 2014 3900 F E 2000 W 1900 9.50 56.50 8.40 2013 3900 C E 2000 W 1900 9.50 56.00 8.40 v Q 2012 3500 C E 1800 W 1700 9.50 56.20 8.70 2011 3800 F E 1900 W 1900 9.50 56.50 10.80 2010 3800 C E 1900 W 1900 10.32 56.59 10.80 2009 3800 C E 1900 W 1900 11.01 56.34 11.30 w 2008 3800 C E 1900 W 1900 11.12 56.68 10.60 M 2007 4600 C E 2300 W 2300 11.68 56.38 14.10 ti 2006 4000 C E 1900 W 2100 11.27 57.97 15.50 0 2005 4700 C E 2300 W 2400 11.40 54.70 17.80 20045000 C E 2400 W 2600 11.30 55.30 10.90 0 2003 4500 C E 2400 W 2100 11.30 54.00 10.90 c 2002 4900 C E 2400 W 2500 12.30 56.30 10.90 c14 2001 4600 C E 2300 W 2300 10.00 57.70 14.70 J a N O a co m L CR C Q 3 U m m C d AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE E S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE v V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN �p *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES Q Packet Pg.006 9.A.7 APPENDIX E L EXCERPT FROM COLLIER COUNTY 2017AUIR a r a Packet Pg. 607 44.0 2015 2016 2017 2016 2016 6D 674 2017 3,300 Tral�'�'� Peak Hour Peak Peak Peak 2017 2017 547 2017 1/7th 1/71h TB Cou Peak Dir Hour Hour Hour Actual Percent 2017 117th Total 1/7th TB 2017 L Year Year Year Exist Cut. Min Peak Service Peak Dir Peak Dir Peak Dir Variation Variation Trip Trip Trip 2017 Remain. 1/7th TB O Expected Intl r'IF0 Penio 11-a 1 ink 4'rnm T. Rnad Cta. Ctrl nir Vnlnme Vnk.mn V ok Vnln.nn Tn Vnk.me Tn Vnk.mn R... Rnnk It- Vnk.mn r'anar:tr V/f c ..fine., 44.0 71 60018 CR846 Immokalee Road Collier Boulevard Wilson Boulevard 6D 674 E E 3,300 1650 1620 1620 0 0.00 % 282 265 547 2167 1133 65.7% C 45.0 71 60018 CR846 Immokalee Road Wilson Boulevard Oil Well Road 6D 675 E E 3,300 1810 1830 1890 60 3.28% 224 205 429 2319 981 70.3% C 46.0 73 60165 CR846 hnmokalee Road Oil Well Road SR 29 2U 672 D E 900 320 370 390 20 5.41% 29 102 131 521 379 57.9% C 47.0 66 99903 Lake Trafford Road Carson Rd SR 29 2U 609 D E 800 460 470 470 0 0.00% 38 0 38 508 292 63.5% C 48.0 60166 Lo an Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Rid a Road 2U 587 D N 1,000 530 610 710 100 16.39% 16 19 35 745 255 74.5% C 49.0 22 68051 Lo an Boulevard Pine Rid a Road Green Boulevard 4D 588 D S 1,900 1350 1410 1570 160 11.35% 0 0 0 1570 330 82.6% D 2023 50.0 79 60166 Logan Boulevard hmnokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 2U 644 D N 1,000 470 590 560 30 -5.08% 0 30 30 590 410 59.0% C 51.0 21 65041 CR881 Livingston Road Imperial Street hnmokalee Road 6/41) 673 D N 3,000 1170 1160 1180 20 1.72% 99 0 99 1279 1721 42.6% B 52.0 57 62071 CR881 Livin Ston Road Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 576 E N 3,100 1620 1610 1610 0 0.00% 38 0 38 1648 1452 53.2% C 53.0 58 62071 CR881 Livin Ston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road Pine Ride Road 6D 575 E S 3,100 1480 1450 1480 30 2.07% 18 0 18 1498 1602 48.3% B 54.0 52 60071 CR881 Livin Ston Road Pine Ridge Road Golden Gate Parkwa 6D 690 E N 3,100 1440 1470 1470 0 0.00%j 34 0 34 1504 1596 48.5% B 55.0 53 60061 CR881 Livin Ston Road Golden Gate Parkwa Radio Road 6D 687 E N 3,000 1220 1220 1270 50 4.10% 39 0 39 1309 1691 43.6% B 58.0 67 99904 N. 1 st Street New Market Road SR -29 (Main Street) 2U 590 D N 900 540 550 590 40 7.27% 0 0 0 590 310 65.6% C 59.0 New Market Road Broward Street SR 29 2U 612 D E 900 470 520 570 50 9.62% 0 0 0 570 330 63.3% C 61.0 36 Ca Keais Oil Well Road hmnokalee Road 2U 626A D S 1,0001 220 220 190 (30) -13.64% 0 108 108 298 702 29.8% B 62.068 99905 CR887 Old US 41 Lee CountyLine US 41 Tamiami Trail 2U 547 D N 1,000 960 960 1050 90 9438% 37 0 37 1087 (87 108.7% F 2018 Existing 63.0 99924 CR896 Seagate Drive Cra on Road US 41 Tamiami Trail 4D 511 D E 1,700 980 970 970 0 0.00% 0 0 0 970 730 57.1% C 64.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ridge Road US 41 (Tamiami Trail) Goodlette-Frank Road 61) 512 E E 2,800 1880 1870 1860 (10) -0.53% 6 0 6 1866 1 934 66.6% C 65.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ride Road Goodlene-Frank Road Shirley Street 6D 514 E W 2,800 1910 1940 1970 30 1.55% 1 0 1 1971 829 70.4% C 66.0 14 69042 CR896 Pine Ride Road ShirleyStreet Airport Road 6D 515 E E 2,800 2230 2250 2390 140 6.22 % 52 0 52 2442 358 87.2% D 2025 67.1 41 60111 CR846 Pine Ride Road Airport Road Livingston Road 61) 526 E E 3,000 2660 2660 2550 (110) -4.14% 35 0 35 2585 415 86.2% D 2025 67.2 41 60111 CR846 Pine Ride Road Livingston Road I-75 6D 628 E E 3,000 2960 2950 2990 40 1.36% 103 0 1033093 93 103.1% F 2018 Exietin 68.0 41 99907 CR896 Pine Ridge Road 1-75 Logan Boulevard 6D 600 E E 2,800 2080 2130 2120 (10) -0.47% l 0 1 2121 679 75.8% D 69.0 15 65032 CR856 Radio Road Ai rt Road Livingston Road 4D 544 D E 1,800 1110 1120 1180 60 5.36% 15 0 15 1195 605 66.4% C 70.0 15 65033 CR856 Radio Road Livings no ivin stop Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 527 D E 1,800 1120 1110 1130 20 1.80% 26 0 26 1156 644 64.2% C 71.0 16 65031 CR856 Radio Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard 41) 685 D W 1,800 540 580 630 50 8.62% 0 85 85 715 1085 39.7% B 72.0 1 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road US 41 Tamiami Trail Charlema e Boulevard 4D 516 D W 1,800 1000 1010 1010 0 0.00% 0 55 55 1065 735 59.2% C 73.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Charlemagne Boulevard County Bam Road 4D 517 D W 1,800 700 700 740 40 5.71% 0 48 48 788 1012 43.8% B 74.0 17 65021 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Coun Bam Road Santa Barbara Boulevard 4D 534 D W 1,900 670 670 700 30 4.48% 0 40 40 740 1160 38.9% B 75.0 77 60169 CR864 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Santa Barbara Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 518 E W 2,900 500 490 490 0 0.00% 56 115 171 661 2239 22.8% B 76.0 56 62081B Santa Barbara Boulevard Green Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway 4D 529 D N 2,100 1230 1240 1270 30 2.42% 0 0 0 1270 830 60.5% C 77.0 56 62081A Santa Barbara Boulevard Golden Gate ParkwayRadio Road 61) 528 E N 3,100 1740 1780 1810 30 1.69% 54 0 54 1864 1236 60.1% C 78.0 56 62081A Santa Barbara Boulevard Radio Road Davis Boulevard 61) 537 E N 3,100 1290 1290 1350 60 4.65% 2131 0 213 1563 1537 50.4% B 79.0 Santa Barbara Boulevard Davis Boulevard Rattleanake-Hammock Road 6D 702 E S 3,100 840 930 890 (40) -4.30% 112 0 112 1002 2098 32.3% B 80.0 SR29 SR 29 US 41 Tamiami Trail CR 837 lanes Scenic Dr 2U 615A D N 900 120 90 150 60 66.67% 0 0 0 150 750 16.7% B 81.0 SR29 SR29 CR 837 (Janes Scenic Dr 1-75 2U 615A D N 900 120 90 150 60 66.67% 0 0 0 150 750 16.7% B 82.0 SR29 SR 29 I-75 Oil Well Road 2U 615A D N 900 120 90 150 60 66.67% 8 61 69 219 681 24.3% B 83.0 SR29 SR 29 Oil Well Road CR 29A South 2U 665A D N 900 2801 3801 410 30 1 7.89% 0 01 0 410 490 45.6% B 84.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A South 9th Street 4D 664 D W 1,700 550 600 600 0 0.00% 12 0 12 612 108836.0% B 85.0 SR29 SR 29 9th Street CR 29A North 2U 663 D S 900 560 620 620 0 0.00% 21 0 21 641 259 71.2% C 86.0 SR29 SR 29 CR 29A North SR 82 2U 663 D S 900 560 620 620 0 0.00% 0 0 0 620 280 68.9% C 87.0 SR29 SR 29 Hendry County Line SR 82 2U 591A D S 800 340 350 360 10 2.86% 0 0 0 360 440 45.0% B 88.0 SR82 SR 82 Lee Coun Line SR 29 2U 661A D S 800 690 710 650 (60) -8.45%1 8 0 8 658 142 82.3% D 2027 91.0 43 US41 Tamiami Trail East Davis Boulevard Airport Road 6D 545 E E 2,900 1700 1580 1700 120 7.59% 23 47 70 1770 1130 61.0% C 92.0 47 US41 Tamiami Trail East Airport Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road 6D 604 E E 2,900 2320 2240 2300 W 2.68% 13 248 261 2561 339 88.3% D 2024 93.0 46 US41 Tamiami Trail East Rattlesnake Hammock Road Triangle Boalevard 6D 572 E E 3,000 1910 1960 1860 100 -5.10% 15 329 3441 2204 796 1 73.5% C 94.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East Triangle Boulevard Collier Boulevard 6D 571 E E 3,000 1490 1510 1620 110 7.28% 0 203 203 1823 1177 60.8% C 95.1 1 US41 Tamiami Trail East Collier Boulevard Joseph Lane 6D 608 D E 3,1001 670 6701 7701 100 14.93% 1341 107 241 1011 2089 32.6% B 95.2 US41 Tamiami Trail East Joseph Lane Green,cay Road 4D 608 D E 2,000 670 670 770 100 14.93% 53 102 155 925 1075 46.3% B 95.3 US41 Tamiami Trail East Grecarvay Road San Marco Drive 2U 608 D E 1,075 670 670 770 100 14.93% 53 4 57 827 248 76.9% D 2027 96.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East San Marco Drive SR 29 2U 617A D E 1,000 220 140 240 100 71.43% 0 0 0 240 760 24.0% B 97.0 US41 Tamiami Trail East SR 29 Dade County Line 2U 616A D E 1,000 190 150 210 60 40.00% 0 0 0 210 790 21.0% B 98.0 71 US41 Tamiami Trail North Lee CountyLine Wi 'ns Pass Road 6D 546 E N 3,100 1990 1990 2090 100 5.03% 97 8 105 2195 905 70.8% C 99.0 50 US41 Tamiami Tmi] North Wi 'ns Pass Road Immokalee Road 6D 564 E N 3,100 2530 2560 2890 330 12.89% 29 8 37 2927 173 94.4% D 2021 2020 100.0 45 US41 Tamiami Trail North Immokalee Road Vanderbilt Beach Road 6D 577 E N 3,100 2060 2280 2320 40 1.75% 18 0 18 2338 762 75.4% D 101.0 45 US41 Tamiami Trail North Vanderbilt Beach Road GulfPark Drive 6D 563 E N 3,100 2300 2300 2330 30 1.30% 3 0 3 2333 7671 75.3% D 102.0 US41 Tamiami Trail North Gulf Park Drive Pine Ride Road 6D 562 E N 3,100 1860 1860 1900 40 2.15% 2 01 21 1902 1 1198 1 61.4% C MASTER 2017.)dsm APPENDIX F BI-DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC COUNTS 9.A.7 r a Packet Pg. 609 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 2 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 06 -Apr -18 Total Time Fri Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 12:15 12:30 12:45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 02:00 02:15 02:30 02:45 03:00 14 6 20 03:15 16 15 31 03:30 11 18 29 03:45 26 20 46 04:00 12 19 31 04:15 17 5 22 04:30 21 10 31 04:45 17 12 29 05:00 14 15 29 05:15 23 7 30 05:30 20 10 30 05:45 14 13 27 06:00 12 7 19 06:15 18 14 32 06:30 13 10 23 06:45 14 8 22 07:00 11 8 19 07:15 16 8 24 07:30 14 10 24 07:45 13 7 20 08:00 11 9 20 08:15 13 8 21 08:30 14 12 26 08:45 5 7 12 09:00 12 8 20 09:15 14 7 21 09:30 11 5 16 09:45 5 7 12 10:00 11 7 18 10:15 8 1 9 10:30 7 2 9 10:45 6 3 9 11:00 14 4 18 11:15 10 2 12 11:30 10 3 13 11:45 13 3 16 Total 480 310 790 Percent 60.8% 39.2% Peak - 15:45 15:15 - - - - - - 15:15 Vol. - 76 72 - - - - - - 137 P.H.F. 0.731 0.900 0.745 m L V Q d M M ti 0 0 0 r- 0 N J a N D a to v v m N •L r CL m c m E s v Q Packet Pg. 610 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 3 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 07 -Apr -18 Total Time Sat Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 8 1 9 12:15 5 1 6 12:30 4 1 5 12:45 2 0 2 01:00 2 1 3 01:15 4 1 5 01:30 1 0 1 01:45 2 0 2 02:00 3 1 4 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 1 1 2 02:45 4 0 4 03:00 3 1 4 03:15 1 2 3 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 1 0 1 04:00 1 2 3 04:15 0 4 4 04:30 1 1 2 04:45 0 2 2 05:00 1 4 5 05:15 2 5 7 05:30 1 9 10 05:45 1 1 2 06:00 1 9 10 06:15 3 14 17 06:30 4 7 11 06:45 11 11 22 07:00 6 11 17 07:15 5 12 17 07:30 6 19 25 07:45 4 8 12 08:00 2 10 12 08:15 2 10 12 08:30 8 12 20 08:45 6 21 27 09:00 7 16 23 09:15 10 9 19 09:30 6 17 23 09:45 2 8 10 10:00 5 12 17 10:15 6 13 19 10:30 8 12 20 10:45 12 12 24 11:00 7 6 13 11:15 9 7 16 11:30 12 7 19 11:45 8 9 17 Total 198 310 508 Percent 39.0% 61.0% Peak - 10:45 08:45 - - - - - - 08:45 Vol. - 40 63 - - - - - - 92 P.H.F. 0.833 0.750 0.852 m L V Q a� d M M 0 0 0 r- 0 N J a N a to v v m N •L ca CL m c m E s Q Packet Pg. 611 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 4 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 07 -Apr -18 Total Time Sat Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 12 12 24 12:15 12 9 21 12:30 11 9 20 12:45 10 13 23 01:00 7 15 22 01:15 10 18 28 01:30 9 8 17 01:45 11 7 18 02:00 11 15 26 02:15 14 5 19 02:30 8 17 25 02:45 10 8 18 03:00 15 9 24 03:15 11 16 27 03:30 10 18 28 03:45 12 12 24 04:00 13 4 17 04:15 12 9 21 04:30 20 13 33 04:45 11 10 21 05:00 13 6 19 05:15 9 9 18 05:30 15 8 23 05:45 7 11 18 06:00 9 9 18 06:15 19 14 33 06:30 7 9 16 06:45 18 8 26 07:00 19 6 25 07:15 11 10 21 07:30 9 6 15 07:45 9 7 16 08:00 12 9 21 08:15 11 5 16 08:30 8 17 25 08:45 12 12 24 09:00 13 6 19 09:15 8 8 16 09:30 8 4 12 09:45 8 6 14 10:00 14 3 17 10:15 14 7 21 10:30 13 5 18 10:45 2 3 5 11:00 13 5 18 11:15 6 5 11 11:30 9 4 13 11:45 6 2 8 Total 531 431 962 Peak - Vol. - P.H.F. 18:15 12:30 63 55 0.788 0.764 15:00 103 0.920 Packet Pg. 612 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 5 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 08 -Apr -18 Total Time Sun Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 11 2 13 12:15 5 3 8 12:30 7 0 7 12:45 7 1 8 01:00 2 0 2 01:15 4 1 5 01:30 1 2 3 01:45 1 0 1 02:00 1 0 1 02:15 1 0 1 02:30 5 2 7 02:45 3 2 5 03:00 3 1 4 03:15 1 0 1 03:30 2 1 3 03:45 2 1 3 04:00 0 1 1 04:15 0 1 1 04:30 0 4 4 04:45 1 3 4 05:00 1 3 4 05:15 1 2 3 05:30 2 6 8 05:45 2 6 8 06:00 2 4 6 06:15 2 6 8 06:30 1 1 2 06:45 2 8 10 07:00 0 2 2 07:15 4 5 9 07:30 5 11 16 07:45 3 5 8 08:00 4 4 8 08:15 6 14 20 08:30 2 11 13 08:45 3 19 22 09:00 4 11 15 09:15 4 17 21 09:30 6 11 17 09:45 12 11 23 10:00 4 14 18 10:15 4 8 12 10:30 8 11 19 10:45 5 10 15 11:00 4 10 14 11:15 5 10 15 11:30 5 9 14 11:45 8 3 11 Total 166 257 423 Peak - Vol. - P.H.F. 12:00 08:30 30 58 0.682 0.763 09:15 79 0.859 Packet Pg. 613 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 6 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 08 -Apr -18 Total Time Sun Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 4 6 10 12:15 13 16 29 12:30 18 7 25 12:45 14 11 25 01:00 9 9 18 01:15 12 8 20 01:30 8 11 19 01:45 12 10 22 02:00 15 10 25 02:15 11 11 22 02:30 11 9 20 02:45 8 10 18 03:00 12 13 25 03:15 11 15 26 03:30 6 9 15 03:45 17 13 30 04:00 6 7 13 04:15 8 8 16 04:30 9 12 21 04:45 18 8 26 05:00 2 9 11 05:15 10 12 22 05:30 16 12 28 05:45 16 14 30 06:00 14 9 23 06:15 9 7 16 06:30 11 13 24 06:45 10 7 17 07:00 8 7 15 07:15 11 10 21 07:30 8 8 16 07:45 11 5 16 08:00 12 7 19 08:15 11 10 21 08:30 11 6 17 08:45 12 10 22 09:00 19 8 27 09:15 17 4 21 09:30 10 2 12 09:45 8 4 12 10:00 11 8 19 10:15 16 4 20 10:30 8 6 14 10:45 10 2 12 11:00 6 4 10 11:15 5 3 8 11:30 8 2 10 11:45 8 0 8 Total 520 396 916 Peak - Vol. - P.H.F. 20:30 15:00 59 50 0.776 0.833 17:15 103 0.858 m L V Q �a a� d M M ti 0 0 0 0 N J a N D a to v v m N •L r ca CL m c m E s Q Packet Pg. 614 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 7 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 09 -Apr -18 Total Time Mon Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 9 2 11 12:15 1 1 2 12:30 2 2 4 12:45 4 1 5 01:00 1 1 2 01:15 1 0 1 01:30 4 0 4 01:45 1 1 2 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 1 0 1 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 1 0 1 03:00 1 2 3 03:15 0 2 2 03:30 1 0 1 03:45 0 1 1 04:00 1 3 4 04:15 1 2 3 04:30 0 4 4 04:45 1 6 7 05:00 0 3 3 05:15 3 5 8 05:30 1 10 11 05:45 3 8 11 06:00 0 15 15 06:15 4 21 25 06:30 12 18 30 06:45 21 24 45 07:00 6 14 20 07:15 11 28 39 07:30 5 38 43 07:45 7 22 29 08:00 14 18 32 08:15 13 18 31 08:30 10 19 29 08:45 7 13 20 09:00 7 12 19 09:15 5 12 17 09:30 8 6 14 09:45 2 6 8 10:00 3 6 9 10:15 8 6 14 10:30 8 13 21 10:45 14 6 20 11:00 6 8 14 11:15 12 5 17 11:30 9 7 16 11:45 11 8 19 Total 240 397 637 Percent 37.7% 62.3% Peak - 06:30 07:15 - - - - - - 06:45 Vol. - 50 106 - - - - - - 147 P.H.F. 0.595 0.697 0.817 Packet Pg. 615 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 8 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 09 -Apr -18 Total Time Mon Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 4 14 18 12:15 9 5 14 12:30 6 8 14 12:45 21 8 29 01:00 12 7 19 01:15 9 10 19 01:30 10 11 21 01:45 8 9 17 02:00 6 9 15 02:15 11 8 19 02:30 15 22 37 02:45 15 9 24 03:00 17 9 26 03:15 15 9 24 03:30 15 26 41 03:45 18 22 40 04:00 24 11 35 04:15 17 9 26 04:30 18 17 35 04:45 26 18 44 05:00 24 19 43 05:15 19 16 35 05:30 24 12 36 05:45 19 18 37 06:00 22 10 32 06:15 7 13 20 06:30 16 10 26 06:45 11 14 25 07:00 14 11 25 07:15 15 11 26 07:30 18 13 31 07:45 16 14 30 08:00 6 12 18 08:15 17 13 30 08:30 14 10 24 08:45 13 9 22 09:00 9 6 15 09:15 9 8 17 09:30 17 4 21 09:45 10 6 16 10:00 14 3 17 10:15 14 2 16 10:30 11 4 15 10:45 9 1 10 11:00 4 2 6 11:15 7 2 9 11:30 9 3 12 11:45 2 1 3 Total 646 488 1134 Percent 57.0% 43.0% Peak - 16:45 16:30 - - - - - - 16:45 Vol. - 93 70 - - - - - - 158 P.H.F. 0.894 0.673 0.898 Packet Pg. 616 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 9 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 10 -Apr -18 Total Time Tue Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 4 1 5 12:15 6 0 6 12:30 4 2 6 12:45 1 1 2 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 1 0 1 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 1 1 2 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 1 1 2 03:00 1 2 3 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 1 1 2 03:45 3 2 5 04:00 1 4 5 04:15 0 4 4 04:30 0 6 6 04:45 1 6 7 05:00 4 5 9 05:15 0 7 7 05:30 2 9 11 05:45 4 6 10 06:00 1 17 18 06:15 6 23 29 06:30 11 19 30 06:45 18 24 42 07:00 9 19 28 07:15 11 31 42 07:30 16 38 54 07:45 6 18 24 08:00 12 21 33 08:15 16 13 29 08:30 10 15 25 08:45 12 12 24 09:00 5 7 12 09:15 09:30 09:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:45 Total 168 315 483 Percent 34.8% 65.2% Peak - 06:45 06:45 - - - - - - 06:45 Vol. - 54 112 - - - - - - 166 P.H.F. 0.750 0.737 0.769 Grand 2949 2904 5853 Total Percent 50.4% 49.6% ADT ADT 1,572 AADT 1,572 m L V Q 7a d M M ti 0 0 0 0 N J a N D a to m N •L r ca CL m c m E s Q Packet Pg. 617 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 1 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 10 -Apr -18 Total Time Tue Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 12:15 12:30 12:45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 02:00 02:15 02:30 02:45 03:00 03:15 03:30 03:45 04:00 04:15 04:30 04:45 05:00 05:15 05:30 05:45 06:00 06:15 06:30 06:45 07:00 07:15 07:30 07:45 08:00 08:15 08:30 08:45 09:00 09:15 09:30 09:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 3 13 16 11:15 12 10 22 11:30 10 9 19 11:45 12 6 18 Total 37 38 75 Percent 49.3% 50.7% Peak - 11:00 11:00 - - - - - - 11:00 Vol. - 37 38 - - - - - - 75 P.H.F. 0.771 0.731 0.852 m L V Q d M M ti 0 0 0 0 N J a N D a to v v to N 2 •L ca CL m c m E s Q Packet Pg. 618 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 2 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 10 -Apr -18 Total Time Tue Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 5 12 17 12:15 9 7 16 12:30 9 9 18 12:45 8 8 16 01:00 6 5 11 01:15 9 6 15 01:30 8 7 15 01:45 12 11 23 02:00 5 5 10 02:15 11 13 24 02:30 9 15 24 02:45 13 17 30 03:00 23 9 32 03:15 15 15 30 03:30 19 18 37 03:45 17 13 30 04:00 14 20 34 04:15 22 15 37 04:30 21 13 34 04:45 15 11 26 05:00 19 10 29 05:15 29 12 41 05:30 20 23 43 05:45 14 16 30 06:00 22 9 31 06:15 12 11 23 06:30 26 12 38 06:45 12 15 27 07:00 14 7 21 07:15 13 8 21 07:30 13 2 15 07:45 7 8 15 08:00 7 4 11 08:15 15 9 24 08:30 15 10 25 08:45 14 10 24 09:00 10 7 17 09:15 12 3 15 09:30 9 5 14 09:45 11 3 14 10:00 10 6 16 10:15 14 5 19 10:30 15 5 20 10:45 8 2 10 11:00 7 2 9 11:15 9 3 12 11:30 6 3 9 11:45 7 2 9 Total 620 441 1061 Percent 58.4% 41.6% Peak - 17:15 15:15 - - - - - - 17:15 Vol. - 85 66 - - - - - - 145 P.H.F. 0.733 0.825 0.843 Packet Pg. 619 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 3 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 11 -Apr -18 Total Time Wed Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 2 1 3 12:15 1 1 2 12:30 1 1 2 12:45 1 1 2 01:00 3 0 3 01:15 1 0 1 01:30 1 1 2 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 1 0 1 02:30 1 0 1 02:45 3 1 4 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 1 1 2 03:30 0 2 2 03:45 1 0 1 04:00 0 3 3 04:15 0 1 1 04:30 1 6 7 04:45 0 2 2 05:00 3 5 8 05:15 1 5 6 05:30 0 8 8 05:45 3 7 10 06:00 3 14 17 06:15 6 24 30 06:30 12 24 36 06:45 19 20 39 07:00 5 20 25 07:15 16 28 44 07:30 14 38 52 07:45 7 28 35 08:00 10 22 32 08:15 16 13 29 08:30 8 13 21 08:45 6 11 17 09:00 6 7 13 09:15 6 6 12 09:30 5 8 13 09:45 5 8 13 10:00 13 12 25 10:15 2 8 10 10:30 7 11 18 10:45 8 9 17 11:00 4 10 14 11:15 14 7 21 11:30 6 5 11 11:45 9 6 15 Total 232 398 630 Peak - Vol. - P.H.F. 06:45 07:15 54 116 0.711 0.763 07:15 163 0.784 Packet Pg. 620 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 4 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 11 -Apr -18 Total Time Wed Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 9 9 18 12:15 4 7 11 12:30 7 2 9 12:45 7 10 17 01:00 12 12 24 01:15 9 12 21 01:30 18 9 27 01:45 11 12 23 02:00 12 7 19 02:15 8 11 19 02:30 14 20 34 02:45 11 9 20 03:00 16 6 22 03:15 14 16 30 03:30 22 20 42 03:45 23 22 45 04:00 21 17 38 04:15 10 11 21 04:30 22 18 40 04:45 11 15 26 05:00 16 7 23 05:15 18 19 37 05:30 25 11 36 05:45 20 12 32 06:00 14 14 28 06:15 22 9 31 06:30 17 9 26 06:45 18 10 28 07:00 14 7 21 07:15 9 13 22 07:30 17 11 28 07:45 15 10 25 08:00 12 9 21 08:15 9 8 17 08:30 15 8 23 08:45 13 10 23 09:00 13 10 23 09:15 16 7 23 09:30 15 4 19 09:45 13 7 20 10:00 10 5 15 10:15 12 1 13 10:30 7 3 10 10:45 9 2 11 11:00 5 5 10 11:15 9 2 11 11:30 4 2 6 11:45 4 4 8 Total 632 464 1096 Percent 57.7% 42.3% Peak - 17:30 15:15 - - - - - - 15:15 Vol. - 81 75 - - - - - - 155 P.H.F. 0.810 0.852 0.861 Packet Pg. 621 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 5 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: South of Majestic Start 12 -Apr -18 Total Time Thu Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 1 1 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 3 0 3 12:45 4 0 4 01:00 4 2 6 01:15 3 0 3 01:30 1 1 2 01:45 1 0 1 02:00 1 0 1 02:15 2 2 4 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 4 1 5 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 1 2 3 03:30 0 1 1 03:45 2 0 2 04:00 0 2 2 04:15 0 4 4 04:30 1 3 4 04:45 2 4 6 05:00 0 7 7 05:15 0 4 4 05:30 4 9 13 05:45 3 13 16 06:00 1 14 15 06:15 4 25 29 06:30 9 20 29 06:45 19 19 38 07:00 11 15 26 07:15 15 28 43 07:30 8 35 43 07:45 13 27 40 08:00 15 25 40 08:15 18 13 31 08:30 14 10 24 08:45 6 7 13 09:00 8 6 14 09:15 9 16 25 09:30 5 9 14 09:45 3 5 8 10:00 5 7 12 10:15 9 10 19 10:30 6 11 17 10:45 7 9 16 11:00 8 6 14 11:15 11:30 11:45 Total 229 373 602 Percent 38.0% 62.0% Peak - 07:45 07:15 - - - - - - 07:15 Vol. - 60 115 - - - - - - 166 P.H.F. 0.789 0.821 0.965 Grand 1750 1714 3464 Total Percent 50.5% 49.5% ADT ADT 1,725 AADT 1,725 Packet Pg. 622 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 1 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 06 -Apr -18 Total Time Fri Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 12:15 12:30 12:45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 02:00 02:15 02:30 02:45 03:00 03:15 03:30 03:45 04:00 04:15 04:30 04:45 05:00 05:15 05:30 05:45 06:00 06:15 06:30 06:45 07:00 07:15 07:30 07:45 08:00 08:15 08:30 08:45 09:00 09:15 09:30 09:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:45 Total 0 0 0 Peak - Vol. - P.H.F. Packet Pg. 623 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 2 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 06 -Apr -18 Total Time Fri Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 12:15 12:30 12:45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 02:00 10 7 17 02:15 3 2 5 02:30 1 3 4 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 1 1 03:30 1 9 10 03:45 4 5 9 04:00 0 9 9 04:15 1 0 1 04:30 2 2 4 04:45 1 3 4 05:00 0 4 4 05:15 0 4 4 05:30 2 1 3 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 1 1 2 06:30 3 1 4 06:45 0 1 1 07:00 0 1 1 07:15 1 3 4 07:30 0 1 1 07:45 1 0 1 08:00 0 1 1 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 0 3 3 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 2 0 2 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 1 1 11:45 0 0 0 Total 33 63 96 Peak - Vol. - P.H.F. 14:00 15:15 14 24 0.350 0.667 15:15 29 0.725 m L V Q d M M ti 0 0 0 0 N J a N D a to v v m N •L r CL m c m E s Q Packet Pg. 624 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 3 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 07 -Apr -18 Total Time Sat Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 1 0 1 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 1 1 2 06:15 0 0 0 06:30 1 1 2 06:45 9 0 9 07:00 2 1 3 07:15 1 0 1 07:30 2 1 3 07:45 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 09:00 1 0 1 09:15 1 1 2 09:30 2 1 3 09:45 0 3 3 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 1 0 1 10:30 0 3 3 10:45 4 3 7 11:00 0 5 5 11:15 2 1 3 11:30 3 0 3 11:45 2 0 2 Total 33 21 54 Percent 61.1% 38.9% Peak - 06:45 10:30 - - - - - - 10:30 Vol. - 14 12 - - - - - - 18 P.H.F. 0.389 0.600 0.643 Packet Pg. 625 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 4 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 07 -Apr -18 Total Time Sat Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 2 1 3 12:15 2 2 4 12:30 1 0 1 12:45 0 3 3 01:00 0 1 1 01:15 0 2 2 01:30 0 1 1 01:45 1 1 2 02:00 3 0 3 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 2 2 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 1 1 03:15 2 3 5 03:30 1 4 5 03:45 1 0 1 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 1 0 1 04:45 0 0 0 05:00 1 2 3 05:15 0 5 5 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 1 1 2 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 1 1 2 06:30 1 1 2 06:45 1 0 1 07:00 1 3 4 07:15 3 2 5 07:30 0 0 0 07:45 2 0 2 08:00 0 1 1 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 1 1 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 Total 25 38 63 Percent 39.7% 60.3% Peak - 18:30 14:45 - - - - - - 15:00 Vol. - 6 8 - - - - - - 12 P.H.F. 0.500 0.500 0.600 m L V Q d M M ti 0 0 0 0 N J a N D a to v v m N •L r CL m c m E s Q Packet Pg. 626 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 5 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 08 -Apr -18 Total Time Sun Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 1 1 2 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 06:45 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 07:15 1 1 2 07:30 0 0 0 07:45 0 0 0 08:00 1 0 1 08:15 1 0 1 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 1 1 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 0 0 0 10:00 1 2 3 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 1 1 2 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 1 2 3 11:45 1 1 2 Total 8 9 17 Percent 47.1% 52.9% Peak - 07:15 10:00 - - - - - - 10:00 Vol. - 2 3 - - - - - - 5 P.H.F. 0.500 0.375 0.417 Packet Pg. 627 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 6 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 08 -Apr -18 Total Time Sun Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 1 0 1 12:15 0 1 1 12:30 1 1 2 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 1 1 2 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 1 1 2 01:45 1 1 2 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 2 1 3 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 1 3 4 03:00 2 2 4 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 1 1 2 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 0 1 1 04:45 1 1 2 05:00 1 1 2 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 2 2 4 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 1 0 1 06:15 1 1 2 06:30 1 1 2 06:45 0 1 1 07:00 0 0 0 07:15 1 1 2 07:30 0 0 0 07:45 1 0 1 08:00 0 0 0 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 1 0 1 10:30 0 1 1 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 Total 21 22 43 Percent 48.8% 51.2% Peak - 14:15 14:15 - - - - - - 14:15 Vol. - 5 6 - - - - - - 11 P.H.F. 0.625 0.500 0.688 m L V Q �a a� d M M 0 0 0 r- 0 N J a N D a to v v m N •L r ca CL m c m E s Q Packet Pg. 628 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 7 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 09 -Apr -18 Total Time Mon Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 1 1 2 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 0 0 0 06:30 9 1 10 06:45 17 2 19 07:00 3 2 5 07:15 1 0 1 07:30 1 1 2 07:45 2 1 3 08:00 1 0 1 08:15 4 1 5 08:30 2 0 2 08:45 4 1 5 09:00 3 0 3 09:15 1 2 3 09:30 2 1 3 09:45 0 2 2 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 2 1 3 10:30 5 5 10 10:45 0 1 1 11:00 1 5 6 11:15 7 3 10 11:30 7 0 7 11:45 3 6 9 Total 76 36 112 Percent 67.9% 32.1% Peak - 06:30 10:30 - - - - - - 06:30 Vol. - 30 14 - - - - - - 35 P.H.F. 0.441 0.700 0.461 Packet Pg. 629 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 8 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 09 -Apr -18 Total Time Mon Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 1 7 8 12:15 2 2 4 12:30 2 4 6 12:45 17 2 19 01:00 0 3 3 01:15 4 4 8 01:30 1 2 3 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 1 1 2 02:15 3 0 3 02:30 3 2 5 02:45 1 2 3 03:00 1 1 2 03:15 1 1 2 03:30 4 8 12 03:45 0 7 7 04:00 0 4 4 04:15 1 2 3 04:30 2 8 10 04:45 3 6 9 05:00 1 4 5 05:15 0 2 2 05:30 0 1 1 05:45 2 6 8 06:00 0 4 4 06:15 0 0 0 06:30 1 0 1 06:45 3 3 6 07:00 1 1 2 07:15 0 1 1 07:30 0 0 0 07:45 2 1 3 08:00 0 0 0 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 2 0 2 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 1 0 1 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 Total 60 89 149 Percent 40.3% 59.7% Peak - 12:30 15:30 - - - - - - 12:00 Vol. - 23 21 - - - - - - 37 P.H.F. 0.338 0.656 0.487 Packet Pg. 630 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 9 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 10 -Apr -18 Total Time Tue Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 1 0 1 06:30 6 1 7 06:45 15 2 17 07:00 8 0 8 07:15 3 3 6 07:30 6 3 9 07:45 3 0 3 08:00 4 1 5 08:15 1 0 1 08:30 2 1 3 08:45 3 1 4 09:00 2 4 6 09:15 09:30 09:45 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:45 Total 54 16 70 Percent 77.1% 22.9% Peak - 06:30 06:45 - - - - - - 06:45 Vol. - 32 8 - - - - - - 40 P.H.F. 0.533 0.667 0.588 Grand 310 294 604 Total Percent 51.3% 48.7% ADT ADT 164 AADT 164 Packet Pg. 631 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 2 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 10 -Apr -18 Total Time Tue Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 2 4 6 12:15 2 0 2 12:30 2 3 5 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 1 1 2 01:15 2 2 4 01:30 0 2 2 01:45 5 0 5 02:00 2 1 3 02:15 0 1 1 02:30 1 1 2 02:45 0 5 5 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 2 2 03:30 3 10 13 03:45 2 3 5 04:00 1 9 10 04:15 4 2 6 04:30 1 4 5 04:45 0 2 2 05:00 1 3 4 05:15 1 0 1 05:30 0 6 6 05:45 1 3 4 06:00 0 2 2 06:15 2 3 5 06:30 1 1 2 06:45 0 1 1 07:00 0 1 1 07:15 0 0 0 07:30 0 0 0 07:45 2 2 4 08:00 0 0 0 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 1 0 1 10:00 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 Total 37 74 111 Percent 33.3% 66.7% Peak - 15:30 15:15 - - - - - - 15:30 Vol. - 10 24 - - - - - - 34 P.H.F. 0.500 0.600 0.654 Packet Pg. 632 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 3 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 11 -Apr -18 Total Time Wed Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 1 1 04:30 0 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 2 0 2 06:15 1 0 1 06:30 6 0 6 06:45 18 1 19 07:00 1 0 1 07:15 5 0 5 07:30 6 1 7 07:45 5 3 8 08:00 1 0 1 08:15 1 0 1 08:30 2 0 2 08:45 2 2 4 09:00 2 0 2 09:15 1 0 1 09:30 1 1 2 09:45 3 1 4 10:00 9 2 11 10:15 1 2 3 10:30 2 1 3 10:45 3 3 6 11:00 0 5 5 11:15 4 1 5 11:30 1 0 1 11:45 3 1 4 Total 80 25 105 Peak - Vol. - P.H.F. 06:30 10:15 30 11 0.417 0.550 06:45 32 0.421 m L V Q d M M ti 0 0 0 0 N J a N D a to v v m N •L CL 3 m c m E s Q Packet Pg. 633 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 4 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 11 -Apr -18 Total Time Wed Northboun Southboun 12:00 PM 5 0 5 12:15 0 4 4 12:30 1 1 2 12:45 1 3 4 01:00 5 3 8 01:15 4 4 8 01:30 5 2 7 01:45 1 2 3 02:00 0 1 1 02:15 2 2 4 02:30 2 6 8 02:45 2 0 2 03:00 2 3 5 03:15 4 9 13 03:30 3 8 11 03:45 1 6 7 04:00 0 5 5 04:15 0 3 3 04:30 1 7 8 04:45 0 3 3 05:00 0 1 1 05:15 0 5 5 05:30 1 2 3 05:45 0 1 1 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 06:45 2 3 5 07:00 0 0 0 07:15 0 1 1 07:30 0 0 0 07:45 4 3 7 08:00 0 1 1 08:15 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 09:15 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 09:45 0 1 1 10:00 0 1 1 10:15 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 Total 46 91 137 Peak - Vol. - P.H.F. 12:45 15:15 15 28 0.750 0.778 15:00 36 0.692 m L V Q d M M 0 0 0 0 N J a N D a to v v m N •L r CL m c m E s Q Packet Pg. 634 Johnson Engineering, Inc. 2350 Stanford Court Naples, FL 34112 9.A.7 Page 5 Site Code: Greenway Station ID: North of Kingdom Start 12 -Apr -18 Total Time Thu Northboun Southboun 12:00 AM 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 01:00 2 2 4 01:15 1 1 2 01:30 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 02:15 1 1 2 02:30 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 03:45 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 04:30 0 0 0 04:45 1 0 1 05:00 0 0 0 05:15 0 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 06:15 1 1 2 06:30 5 0 5 06:45 18 1 19 07:00 4 0 4 07:15 3 0 3 07:30 2 1 3 07:45 4 1 5 08:00 5 2 7 08:15 2 0 2 08:30 7 1 8 08:45 2 0 2 09:00 2 0 2 09:15 2 3 5 09:30 3 0 3 09:45 2 0 2 10:00 1 1 2 10:15 4 2 6 10:30 3 4 7 10:45 3 2 5 11:00 4 7 11 11:15 11:30 11:45 Total 82 30 112 Percent 73.2% 26.8% Peak - 06:30 10:15 - - - - - - 06:30 Vol. - 30 15 - - - - - - 31 P.H.F. 0.417 0.536 0.408 Grand 265 234 499 Total Percent 53.1% 46.9% ADT ADT 245 AADT 245 m L V Q d M M 0 0 0 0 N J a N D a to v v m N •L r ca CL M c m E s Q Packet Pg. 635 APPENDIX G TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS 9.A.7 r a Packet Pg. 636 ENGINEERING Peak Hour based off of collected bi-directional traffic count data. 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 637 SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS - Regal Acres II LOCATION: Majestic Circle & Greenway Road 4/10/2018 COUNTY: Collier Street: Majestic Cir L T R R T L T N Street: Greenway Rd Total OBSERVER: R. Pontide ROAD CONDITION: Dry REMARKS: VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BEGIN L T R Ped. L T R Ped. L T R Ped. L T R Ped. 16:30 15 6 NA 0 NA 13 0 0 0 NA 6 0 40 16:45 11 4 NA 0 NA 11 0 0 0 NA 7 0 33 17:00 16 3 NA 0 NA 10 0 0 0 NA 5 0 34 17:15 18 11 NA 0 NA 12 0 0 0 NA 6 0 47 PK. HOUR TOTAL 60 24 NA 0 NA 46 0 0 0 NA 24 0 154 P.H.F. 1 0.83 1 0.55 1 NA I NA 1 NA 1 0.88 1 NA NA 1 NA NA 1 0.86 NA 0.82 Peak Hour based off of collected bi-directional traffic count data. 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 637 ENGINEERING Peak Hour based off of collected bi-directional traffic count data. 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 638 SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS - Regal Acres II LOCATION: Kingdom Ct & Greenway Road 4/10/2018 COUNTY: Collier Street: Kingdom Ct L R R T L T N Street: Greenway Rd Total OBSERVER: R. Pontide ROAD CONDITION: Dry REMARKS: VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BEGIN L T R Ped. L T R Ped. L T R Ped. L T R Ped. 16:30 5 1 NA 0 NA 4 0 0 0 NA 4 0 14 16:45 4 0 NA 0 NA 3 0 0 0 NA 3 0 10 17:00 2 1 NA 0 NA 2 0 0 0 NA 2 0 7 17:15 1 10 1 NA 0 NA 0 0 0 0 NA 7 0 18 PK. HOUR TOTAL 21 3 NA 0 NA 9 0 0 0 NA 16 0 49 P.H.F. 0.53 0.75 1 NA I NA I NA 0.56 1 NA I NA 1 NA NA 1 0.57 1 NA 0.68 Peak Hour based off of collected bi-directional traffic count data. 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 638 ENGINEERING Peak Hour based off of collected bi-directional traffic count data. 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 639 SUMMARY OF VEHICLE MOVEMENTS - Regal Acres II LOCATION: Synegenta & Greenway Road 4/10/2018 COUNTY: Collier N T L Synegenta Seeds Inc. I.n L T R Street: Greenway Rd Total OBSERVER: R. Pontide ROAD CONDITION: Dry REMARKS: VEHICLE MOVEMENTS TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND BEGIN L T R Ped. L T R Ped. L T R Ped. L T R Ped. 16:30 NA 1 0 0 0 2 NA 0 2 NA 0 0 5 16:45 NA 0 0 0 0 0 NA 0 2 NA 0 0 2 17:00 NA 0 1 0 0 0 NA 0 3 NA 0 0 4 17:15 NA 1 0 0 0 0 NA 0 0 NA 0 0 1 PK. HOUR TOTAL NA 2 1 0 0 2 NA 0 7 NA 0 0 12 P.H.F. NA 1 0.50 1 0.25 1 NA I NA 1 0.25 1 NA NA 0.58 NA NA I NA 0.60 Peak Hour based off of collected bi-directional traffic count data. 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 639 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Q Packet Pg. 640 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 1 Code Section 10.02.02 A-4 Subsection (a) — Applicant Information..................................................................... 1 Subsection (b) — Mapping and Support Graphics...................................................... 1 Subsection (c) — GMP Consistency Determinations.................................................. 3 Subsection (d) — Native Vegetation Preservation...................................................... 4 Subsection (e) — Wetlands......................................................................................... 7 Subsection (f) — Listed Species.................................................................................. 8 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Habitat / FLUCFCS Types and Acreage .................................................... 2 Table 2: Native Vegetation Habitat Type and Acreage ............................................ 6 Table 3: SFWMD / Collier County Wetlands and Surface Waters .......................... 7 Table 4: Potential Protected Plant Species................................................................ 9 Table 5: Potential Protected Wildlife........................................................................ 10 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Resume Attachment B. Environmental Drawings Attachment C. Protected Species Survey Attachment D. Florida Black Bear Management Plan Attachment E. Wading Bird Management Plan 9.A.7 m L U a a� as M M ti 0 0 0 ti 0 N J d N a. co N R ca a CU m r c as E U 2 r a Packet Pg. 642 INTRODUCTION Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc (HHCC) proposes to expand the existing Regal Acres residential development to include additional property located west of the existing development. The original development (Parcel A) includes approximately 36.75 acres of existing residential use including 184 dwellings. The addition to Regal Acres (Parcel B) includes an additional 23.15 acres located west of Majestic Circle, approximately 0.67 miles north of US 41. HHCC proposes to construct an additional 116 residential units in the Regal Acres Parcel B project. The project is located in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida with central coordinates of 26°02'55.9" North and 81 °39'34.5" West. Please refer to Sheet 1 of Attachment B for a location map. Land uses surrounding the project area include existing residential to the west, south and east, and vacant residential (with infrastructure) to the north. 10.02.02 A-4 Subsection (a): Applicant Information Responsible person who wrote the EIS and his/her education and job related environmental experience. A. Gary Nychyk, Johnson Engineering, Inc. Ecologist. A copy of Mr. Nychyk's resume is provided as Attachment A. ii. Owner(s)/agent(s) name, address, phone number, and e-mail. Owner: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County 11145 Tamiami Trail E Naples, Florida 34113 (239) 775-0036 nkouloheras ghabitatcollier. org Subsection (b): Mapping and Support Graphics Please Note: The majority of the mapping and supporting graphics are focused on the additional 23.15 acres of land being incorporated into the PUD (i.e. — Parcel B). Parcel A is completely developed and was not subject to updated mapping and field reviews. General Location Map A project location map is provided on Sheet 1 of Attachment B. -1- Packet Pg. 643 ii. Native Habitat Map A Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) map has been included for Parcel B at a scale of one -inch equals two hundred fifty feet (1" = 250') for the property and overlain on a 2016 digital aerial photograph. The Aerial Photograph and FLUCFCS Map are included on Sheet 3 of Attachment B. A Native Vegetation Map is also included on Sheet 6 of Attachment B, and Table 1 provides a synopsis of the habitat types found within the additional (Parcel B) project. Table 1: Habitat Descriptions FLUCFCS Description 261E2 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% 261E3 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 50-74% 321E1 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 10-24% 321E2 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 434E2 Hardwood -Conifer Mix, Exotics 25-49% 434E3 Hardwood -Conifer Mix, Exotics 50-74% 514 Swale 643E2 Wet Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 643E3 Wet Prairie, Exotics 50-74% iii. Topographic Map and Existing Drainage Patterns A Topographic Map showing Lidar data supplied by Collier County has been prepared to illustrate contour elevations and is included on Sheet 4 of Attachment B. iv. Soils Map According to the Collier County Soils Map, the following soil types are found on the property: Holopaw fine sand, limestone substratum (soil map unit 2), Ft. drum and Malabar fine sands (soil map unit 20), Holopaw fine sand (soil map unit 27), and urban land (soil map unit 32). A Soils Map is included on Sheet 2 of Attachment B. V. Development Plan The Preliminary Site Plan is depicted on Sheet 5 Attachment B. vii. Site Plan The Preliminary Site Plan is depicted on Sheet 5 Attachment B. -2- 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 644 Subsection (c): GMP Consistency Determination Conservation and Coastal Management Element consistency: Policy 6.1.1 The native preservation requirement for the proposed Regal Acres Parcel B is 25% of the existing native vegetation. As illustrated in the Native Vegetation Map in Attachment B, approximately 22.46 acres of Parcel B are classified as native vegetation. The swale (FLUCFCS 511) was excluded from native vegetation calculations. Therefore approximately 5.62 acres of native vegetation are required for the project. The proposed conceptual site plan provides 5.62 acres of onsite preservation in the western portion of the site as one large preserve. This portion of the property was selected for preservation to align with the offsite preserve of the adjacent development to the west. Policy 6.1.4: All invasive exotic vegetation will be removed from the project site during the development process. The site will be maintained free of invasive exotic species in accordance with permit conditions in perpetuity. Policy 6.1.7: Native vegetation will be incorporated into the landscape designs as required by the LDC. Native vegetation has been retained as depicted in the Native Vegetation Map and wet detention ponds will include a littoral shelf planted with native aquatic vegetation as required. Policy 6.1.8: Regal Acres Parcel B is located within the Urban Residential land use district. This document provides an objective evaluation of the impacts associated with the proposed development. The information within this evaluation will aide in planning and zoning decisions related to natural resources and environmental quality of the project. Policy 6.2.1 & 6.2.2 The jurisdictional wetland determination for Regal Acres Parcel B has not been verified by the SFWMD or USACE. The jurisdictional wetland limits will be reviewed by the agencies as part of the Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) and federal dredge and fill permit processes. Preliminary field determination indicates the subject property contains approximately 6.05 acres of wetlands and 0.69 acres of surface waters. As the limits have not been agency verified, the acreages are subject to change. The conceptual site plan proposes impacts to approximately 4.30 acres of wetlands and 0.69 acres of surface waters. The 4.30 acres of wetland impacts represent approximately 18.6% of Parcel B and 71.1 % of the wetlands on Parcel B. The remaining 1.77 acres of wetlands will be incorporated into the proposed 5.62 -acre preserve. Policy 6.2.4 As shown in the environmental drawings (Attachment B), Regal Acres Parcel B is surrounded by existing residential development. Berms along the western and northern property lines sever hydrologic connections between adjacent developments and a swale along the eastern property line drains surface water to the canal along the southern property line. This alteration in natural hydrology appears to have reduced the hydroperiod of the wetlands onsite. The proposed -3- 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 645 development will preserve 1.77 acres of wetlands onsite. The hydrology of the wetlands will be improved through the discharge of water into them from the stormwater management system, after the water has been fully treated to State water quality standards. Impacts to wetlands within Regal Acres Parcel B will be permitted and mitigated through the ERP and Federal Dredge and Fill permitting processes with SFWMD and USACE. Policy 6.2.6 Wetland preservation and mitigation areas will be protected by conservation easements as specified by permitting agencies and maintained as conservation areas. Policy 7.1.1 This policy requires incompatible land uses be directed away from listed species and their habitats. The development will coordinate with State and federal wildlife agencies to determine any appropriate mitigation for the loss of listed species habitat during the SFWMD and USACE review processes. Based upon current FWS methodology, the applicant will likely be required to provide mitigation for the entire 23.15 -acre project site for potential impacts to Florida panther habitat. This mitigation is usually provided through the purchase of Panther Habitat Units (PHU) from a mitigation or conservation bank. No direct impacts to listed species are anticipated as a result of the development. Policy 7.1.2 A Protected Species Survey has been completed for the site and is attached as Attachment C. Management plans for the Florida black bear and wading birds have been included as Attachment D and Attachment E respectively. Policy 7.1.4 The Regal Acres Parcel B project will be reviewed by FWC and FWS during the ERP and federal dredge and fill permitting process. Subsection (d): Native Vegetation Preservation Identify the acreage and community type of all upland and wetland habitats found on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS). Provide a description of each of the FLUCFCS categories identified onsite by vegetation type (species), vegetation composition (canopy, midstory, and groundcover) and vegetation dominance (dominant, common, occasional). Following is a description of the five (5) base FLUCFCS types identified within the additional 23.15 -acre project area. The descriptions represent the overall vegetative/land use conditions and do not include the modifying levels of disturbance and/or exotic infestation. Levels of disturbance and exotic invasion are indicated by the following suffixes: E 1 = Exotics 10-24% cover E2 = Exotics 25-49% cover -4- 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 646 E3 = Exotics 50-74% cover Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-74% FLUCFCS Codes 261E2 and 261E3: (2.33 acres) The abandoned agriculture code is a remnant of row crops that once existed on the eastern side of the project area and continued onto property to the east. 2004 aerial photographs from Google Earth show the remnant agricultural rows and swales. Currently, this cover type is comprised of earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii) in the canopy. Midstory species include earleaf acacia and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolus). Ground cover is limited due to the dense coverage of exotic species, but includes muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) and other herbs and forbs that can withstand reduced sunlight. Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 10-49% FLUCFCS Codes 321E1 and 321E2: (2.88 acres) This upland habitat includes widely scattered slash pine, melaleuca and earleaf acacia in the canopy. Midstory species include saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), gallberry (Ilex glabra) and coastalplain staggerbush (Lyonia fruticosa). Groundcover species include wiregrass (Aristida stricta), pawpaw (Asimina reticulata), bogbuttons (Lachnocaulon anceps) and drumheads (Polygala sp.). Hardwood—Conifer Mix, Exotics 25-74% FLUCFCS Codes 434E2 and 434E3: (11.20 acres) This forested upland habitat type includes slash pine, live oak (Quercus virginiana), cabbage palm, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia in the canopy, with exotic vegetation covering up to 74%. Midstory vegetation includes saw palmetto, gallberry and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera). Ground cover is comprised primarily of wiregrass, muscadine, and swamp fern. Swale, FLUCFCS Code 514: (0.69 acres) This surface water runs from north to south near the eastern property line and empties into the canal located south of the project. Vegetation within the swale is sparse, but includes cabbage palm, earleaf acacia and melaleuca in the canopy. Brazilian pepper occupies the midstory. Groundcover is nearly absent. Wet Prairie, Exotics 25 — 74% FLUCFCS Codes 643E2 and 643E3: (6.05 acres) This disturbed wetland community has been isolated from historic hydrologic patterns through the construction of the swale to the east, residential development with perimeter berms to the north and west, and the canal to the south. The canopy is predominantly composed of melaleuca with scattered slash pine, live oak, cabbage palm and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum). Removal of the canopy exotics would result in less than 10% canopy closure, leading to the classification of wet prairie instead of a forested habitat code. Midstory and groundcover vegetation are sparse, but include Brazilian pepper, swamp fern, sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), and blue maidencane (Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum). Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in Goal 6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and Chapters 4 and 10 of the Land Development Code. -5- 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 647 The native preservation requirement for the proposed development of Regal Acres Parcel B was determined to be 25% of 22.46 acres of Parcel B (the swale was excluded from native preservation calculations). Therefore, the native vegetation preserve requirement is 5.68 acres. The proposed conceptual site plan provides on contiguous 5.68 -acre preserve, located along the western boundary of the development, as illustrated on the Preserve Map (Sheet 8, Attachment B). This location of native vegetation was selected for preserve by utilizing the selection criteria outlined in the LDC. Due to the level of exotic vegetation and altered hydrology, the onsite wetlands would have a UMAM functional assessment of value less than 0.65. The site represents infill development and therefore does not provide for wildlife corridors. Placing the preserve adjacent to an off-site preserve maximizes its potential use for wildlife to the maximum extent feasible. The Native Vegetation Map provided on (Sheet 7, Attachment B) illustrates those areas of the site currently considered to be native vegetation. Table 2 provides the acreage of these native habitats. Table 2: Native Vegetation Habitat Types and Acreage FLUCFCS Description Native Vegetation Acreage 261E2 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% 1.31 261E3 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 50-74% 1.02 321E1 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 10-24% 1.18 321E2 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 1.70 434E2 Hardwood -Conifer Mix, Exotics 25-49% 7.64 434E3 Hardwood -Conifer Mix, Exotics 50-74% 3.56 643E2 Wet Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 4.52 643E3 Wet Prairie, Exotics 50-74% 1.53 Total 22.46 LDC Section 4.06.04 All vegetation clearing activities will be in accordance with the approved SBR only after a Vegetation Removal Permit has been obtained through County Staff. LDC Section 10.02.14 All preserve areas will be shown on the landscape plan portion of the SBR. Have preserves or acreage requirements for preservation previously been identified for the site during previous development order approvals? This site has not been subjected to previous development approvals. For properties with Special Treatment overlays, show the ST overlay on the development plan and provide an explanation as to why these areas are being impacted or preserved. No ST overlays were identified on this property. 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 648 Subsection (e): Wetlands i. Define the number of' acres of Collier County jurisdictional wetlands according to FLUCFCS. Include a description of each of the FLUCFCS categories identified onsite by vegetation type, composition, and dominance. Wetland determinations are required to be verified by the SFWMD prior to submission to the County. The proposed Regal Acres Parcel B project preliminarily contains 6.05± acres of SFWMD/Collier County jurisdictional wetlands. This acreage was determined based upon field flagging preliminary wetland limits and GPS locating the limits to determine the associated acreage. As this application is solely to obtain zoning approval of the approved RPUD, the wetland limits have not been reviewed by SFWMD staff. At time of development review, the limits of wetlands will have been verified by SFWMD staff as part of the ERP process. The FLUCFCS Map on Sheet 3 of Attachment B illustrates the areas preliminarily determined to be jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters. The wetlands found on the site are comprised of two FLUCFCS types: Wet Prairie, Exotics 25-49% (FLUCFCS Code 643E2) and Wet Prairie, Exotics 50-74%% (FLUCFCS Code 643E3). Additionally, 0.69 acres of the project area are designated as Swale (FLUCFCS Code 514), which is a surface water. Typically, SFWMD does not require mitigation for impacts to surface waters, and are thus excluded from the calculated wetland acreage. Wetland acreages for the site and a description of each wetland FLUCFCS type can be found in Table 3. Table 3: SFWMD / Collier Countv Wetlands FLUCFCS Description Acreage 643E2 Wet Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 4.52 643E3 Wet Prairie, Exotics 50-74% 1.53 Total 6.05 Note: * The swale (FLUCFCS Code 514) is not considered wetland, but a Surface Water. SFWMD typically does not require mitigation for impacts to man-made Surface Waters Wet Prairie, Exotics 25 — 49%: FLUCFCS Code 643E2 (4.52 acres) This disturbed wetland community has been isolated from historic hydrologic patterns through the construction of the swale to the east, residential development with perimeter berms to the north and west, and the canal to the south. The canopy is predominantly composed of melaleuca with scattered slash pine, live oak, cabbage palm and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum). Removal of the canopy exotics would result in less than 10% canopy closure, leading to the classification of wet prairie instead of a forested habitat code. Midstory and groundcover vegetation are sparse, but include Brazilian pepper, swamp fern, sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), and blue maidencane (Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum). -7- 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 649 9.A.7 Wet Prairie, Exotics 50 - 74%: FLUCFCS Code 643E3 (1.53 acres) This disturbed wetland community is similar to 643E2 described above, however exotic species such as earleaf acacia, melaleuca, and Brazilian pepper cover up to 74%. ii. Determine seasonal and historic high water levels utilizing lichen lines or other biological indicators. Indicate how the project design improves/affects predevelopment hydroperiods. Provide a narrative addressing the anticipated control elevations for the site. The control elevation for the proposed project will be determined during the ERP process. When the jurisdictional wetland limits are reviewed by SFWMD staff as part of an ERP application, they will also evaluate seasonal high water levels based upon above ground biological indicators. iii. Indicate the proposed percent of defined wetlands to be impacted and the effects of proposed impacts on the functions of these wetlands. Provide an exhibit showing the location of wetlands to be impacted and those to be preserved onsite. Describe how impacts to wetlands have been minimized. Preliminarily, the site contains approximately 6.05 acres of jurisdictional wetlands within two (2) separate wetland areas as illustrated on the Aerial and FLUCFCS Map on Sheet 3 of Attachment B. Due to configuration of the wetlands onsite, wetland impacts are unavoidable for development of a feasible site plan. A total of 4.30 acres (71.1%) of the jurisdictional wetlands is proposed for impact as part of the conceptual site plan. The Wetland Impact Map on Sheet 9 of Attachment B depicts proposed impacts to wetlands. The remaining 1.76 acres of onsite wetlands will be incorporated into the 5.68 -acre onsite preserve along with approximately 3.86 acres of surrounding uplands. The preserved wetlands/wetland impacts are illustrated on the Preserve Map and Wetland Impact Map on Sheets 8 and of Attachment B. The preserved wetlands and uplands will be enhanced through exotic removal and maintained in perpetuity through a conservation easement. This preserve configuration provides one large preserve at the edge of development, which is more valuable to wildlife than a preserve surrounded by the development. iv. Indicate how the project design compensates for wetland impacts pursuant to the Policies and Objectives in goal 6 in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed wetland impacts must be reviewed and approved by the SFWMD and USACE prior to SBR approval. These agencies will evaluate the need for and assess appropriate compensatory mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts at that time. Subsection (f): Listed Species i. Provide a plant and animal species survey to include at a minimum, listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing onsite, and conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Packet Pg. 650 and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State actual survey times and dates, and provide a map showing the location of species of special status identified onsite. The Regal Acres Parcel B Protected Species Survey (Attachment C) provides detailed information regarding potential and observed protected species. ii. Identify all listed species that are known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on the site or that have been directly observed onsite. Listed plant species that have the potential to occur and/or have been observed on the project site are listed in Table 4. Listed wildlife species that have the potential to occur and/or have been observed on the property are listed in Table 5. Please refer to the PSS report in Attachment C for details regarding potential utilization of the site by listed species. Table 4. Potential Protected Plant Species Legend FDA — Florida Department of Agriculture E — Endangered C — Commercially Exploited In Packet Pg. 651 Designated Potential to Occur or Scientific Name Common Name Status Observed FDA Cyrtopodium punctatum Cowhorn Orchid E Potential Encyclia tampensis Butterfly Orchid C Potential Tillandsia fasciculate Stiff Leaved Wild Pine E Potential Tillandsia utriculata Giant Wild Pine, Giant E Potential I Air Plant Tillandsia pruinosa Fuzzy-wuzzy Air Plant E Potential Tillandsia flexuosa Twisted Air Plant T Potential Legend FDA — Florida Department of Agriculture E — Endangered C — Commercially Exploited In Packet Pg. 651 Table 5: Potential Protected Wildlife. Upland Prairie FLUCFCS Potential Protected Species (Common Name) Potential Protected Species (Scientific name) Gopher Tortoise Go herus polyphemus Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais cou eri 261E2 Florida Pine Snake Pituo his melanoleucus mu itus 261 E3 321E1 Florida Sandhill Crane Antigone canadensis pratensis 321E2 Florida Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia oridana Southeastern American Kestrel Falco s arverius paulus Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi Upland Forest 01-7 FLUCFCS Potential Protected Species (Common Name) Potential Protected Species (Scientific Name) Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais cou eri Florida Pine Snake Pituo his melanoleucus mu itus 434E2 Red -Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis 434E3 Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus ni er avicennia Florida Bonneted Bat Eumo s oridanus Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi Wetlands and Surface Waters FLUCFCS Potential Protected Species (Common Name) Potential Protected Species (Scientific Name) American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis American Crocodile Crocod lus acutus Eastern Indio Snake Drymarchon carais cou eri Florida Pine Snake Pituo his melanoleucus mu itus Little Blue Heron E retta caerulea 514 Reddish Egret E retta ru escens 643E2 643E3 Roseate Spoonbill Platalea a'a'a Tricolored Heron E retta tricolor Wood Stork M cteria americana Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus ni er avicennia Florida Bonneted Bat Eumo s oridanus Florida Panther Puma concolor co i *Please note: The list of potential protected wildlife is based strictly on the habitat types present on the site and does not take into account the small size of the habitat that may lessen its value for far-ranging species. -10- 9.A.7 to Iqm �L CL M m c m M V 2 a Packet Pg. 652 ATTACHMENT A RESUME 9.A.7 r a Packet Pg. 653 A. GARY NYCHYK ECOLOGIST agn(cDjohnsonsenq.com 239.461.2464 YEARS EXPERIENCE 12 years EDUCATION /CERTIFICATIONS B.S. MARINE BIOLOGY, 1998 UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA AUTHORIZED GOPHER TORTOISE AGENT, FFWCC (GTA -15-00036A) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ESTERO BAY AGENCY ON BAY MANAGEMENT 9.A.7 Gary Nychyk joined Johnson Engineering, Inc. in January 2004 as an Ecologist. His duties include vegetation mapping, wildlife surveys, track surveys, protected species management plans, wetland jurisdictional delineations, wetland mitigation monitoring, prescribed burning, and exotic vegetation control. Mr. Nychyk works closely with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Lee County Port Authority, as well as local city and county government agencies. N ❖ Project Experience • Florida Bonneted Bat acoustic and cavity tree surveys for several a southwest Florida clients. • NPDES annual compliance inspection and training for Southwest W Florida International Airport and Page Field. • Gopher Tortoise permitting, surveys and relocation for several area c developers. • Babcock Community vegetation, wildlife, bird call, and frog species o monitoring programs. • Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Faith Landing preserve area N monitoring. • Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Kaicasa wildlife surveys and a permitting. �o Prior to employment with Johnson Engineering, Mr. Nychyk was a N Senior Environmental Planner with the Lee County Department of 2 Community Development, Division of Environmental Sciences. Mr. 2 Nychyk coordinated Vegetation Removal Permitting, and Agricultural a Notices of Clearing. He also reviewed local development orders for Y compliance with the Lee County Land Development Code, and planned development rezoning cases before the Lee County Board of 0° County Commissioners, and the Bonita Springs City Counsel. Mr. Nychyk also reviewed protected species surveys and management E plans and performed helicopter and vehicle based monitoring surveys for southern bald eagle nest locations throughout Lee County. Q Mr. Nychyk was also employed as an Environmental Specialist for Wetland Sciences Inc. (WSI) in Gulf Breeze, Florida. Duties with WS] included erosion control projects on Eglin Airforce Base, wetland restoration and mitigation, as well as identification of aquatic invertebrates for indications of water quality on a chemical spill site. Packet Pg. 654 ATTACHMENT B ENVIRONMENTAL DRAWINGS I 9.A.7 I Packet Pg. 655 I 9.A.7 I Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East "'v' CO. Latitude:26° 02' 55.9" N, Longitude: 81' 39' 34.5" W The aerial photos shown were taken in 2016. STREET MAP N.T.S. VICINITY AERIAL N.T.S. m L U a M Cl) ti r O O O r O N J a N D D a W O A �L C� G CL V m c m E L V m a JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2122JSTREET Location Map P.O..O.BOX BOX 1550 FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33902-1550 Regal Acres Parcel B Collier County, Florida PHONE (239) 334-0046 EN I N E E R I N G EFAX.B. (23 ) 3346 #642 DATE PROJECT FILE NO. SCALE SHEET January 2018 20170078-000 12-51-26 N°I Packet Pg. 656 PROJECT LOCATION MANCHESTER DR KINGDOM CT MANATEE RD o T9�iq�iT L o < RFS \Zz V- O0 W O K VO -(L V x w v> w > n °q Qq —O CAMPANILE CIR ¢ m -J OSS = ¢ TROP/C FOR CECIL RD U o m gC4Ni p STREET MAP N.T.S. VICINITY AERIAL N.T.S. m L U a M Cl) ti r O O O r O N J a N D D a W O A �L C� G CL V m c m E L V m a JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2122JSTREET Location Map P.O..O.BOX BOX 1550 FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33902-1550 Regal Acres Parcel B Collier County, Florida PHONE (239) 334-0046 EN I N E E R I N G EFAX.B. (23 ) 3346 #642 DATE PROJECT FILE NO. SCALE SHEET January 2018 20170078-000 12-51-26 N°I Packet Pg. 656 2 It \ E L .' 211 Y PARCEL A \ 2 \ \ — 20 e 20 �� .. PARCEL B REGAL ACRES - PARCEL B HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY I 9.A.7 I 0 62.5 1® D (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: VL250') N 1 ci ti \ \ O I's I f 4' O N J a N 0 to Iq Soils Legend Symbol Soil Name Hydric Status 2 Holopaw fine sand, limestone substratum Yes 3 Malabar fine sand Yes 20 Ft drum and malabar, fine sands No 27 Holopaw tine sand Yes 32 Urban land No O N J a N 0 to Iq 32 •' LEGEND r , 1 E PROJECT BOUNDARY HYDRIC SOILS m '• NOTES: �• 1. The aerial shown from Collier County Digital Library and dated: November Z m _1� ff _ photos w� 2. Soil information based on USDA Soil Survey 1988. Soil description updated 1990. . � I t� JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 Aerial and Soils Map S V PHONE: (239) 434-0333 FAX (239) 334-3661 JDA E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 ENGINEERING ANUARY E PROJECT No E No. SCA E SHEET 201 0170078-00 12-51-26 AS SHOWN 2 +1 -+ *— it s Oka.. - W. f 261 E3 a Ac±} k k F K S x 514 u 119 ATL GREENWAY ROAD •_-'---4 - - --- + s T4 I } EMPEROR LN. - _I i. I w•I M � �. 1, 1-:7 1� I. w' -1 MAJESTIC CIR. , C5 '•I F 3 •f r. i I PARCEL A 1 S I .1F- �j I, I 'I� I I[I MAJESTIC CIR. 1 ;C -_-_ I�� II I� I�' �� •� . ,moi -I SE3 AC± (131 ACt) �- 434E2 643E2 / 643E2 j 321 C1 - • /° 'L (5.92 ACt) (1.59 .. 'bY'J Af.J✓/ - y' j 321E2 ' (110 ACt) � ,.. PARCEL B J -y' . Alf 1 f 643E3 434E2 643E3 . r (0.34 ACI) 11.]2 AL3) (1.19 AL3) (12fi ACi) r E I %osm. =t. I 9.A.7 I �� 0 62.5 1® 0 (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1"=250') REGAL ACRES PARCEL A FLUCFCS STATE CODE DESCRIPTION STATUS ACREAGE 120 1 EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT N 36.75 TOTAL 36.75 REGAL ACRES PARCEL B FLUCFCS CODE DESCRIPTION NATIVE STATE ACREAGE VEGETATION STATUS 261E2 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% YES N 1.31 261E3 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 50-749. YES N 1.02 321E1 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 1 – 24% YES N 1.18 321E2 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25 – 49% YES N 1.70 434E2 Hardwood – Conifer Mixed, Ex.— 25 – 49% YES N 7.64 434E3 Hardwood – Conifer Mixed, Exotics 50 – 74% YES N 3.56 514 NO SW 0.69 iExotics 25 – 49% �.l YE$ W3 Prairie, Exotics 50 – 74% YES W 1.53 TOTAL 23.15 JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. �� 2350 STANFORD COURT HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF t/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 REGAL ACRES - PARCEL B PHONE: 123)1) a3a-D333 COLLIER COUNTY FAx: (z3s) 334-3661 E N G I N E E R I N G E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 6t AN9 91L TN (%'RICA LAN= AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCFCS) (FOOT lass). EW ORTHOPNA 01"111117 FLONN6 NOKMBER ]] OF 2016. 111AI" *Al 1Y 1111ER 1— ur— Legend Project Boundary FLUCFCS ® $FWMDWBIIantls (6.05 AC) SFWMD Surface Water (0.69 AC) Aerial and FLUCFCS Map 12-51-26 1 AS SHOWN a V 3 Q � y° mop°< A� Oa Q o $ �I o ° m � o•e ` o � PARCEL Aotlo p I '° P.d a or oar °•® °e' �bRb °.BOO $..-b�°.� •eo ° f�q° �° aDo O oQ o s� PARCEL B f. ae a q1 � °D 0p -% ) 0 C Oo 2r EU o- �o � �'• a�oo °°• II ih II . A H NOTE: CONTOUR DATA SHOWN WAS GENERATED FROM LIDAR DATA SUPPLIED BY w U COLLIER COUNTY ORIGINATING FROM THE 2007 STATEWIDE COASTAL DATA COLLECTION EFFORT HEADED UP BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA EMERGENCY OPERATIONS DIVISION, ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON NAVD 1988 VERTICAL DATUM. .% JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ` z3so STANFORD COURT REGAL ACRES - PARCEL B r P ONES'(239)103430333 COLLIER COUNTY FAX: (239) 334-3661 E N G I N E E R I N G E.B. #642 & LEL #142 DATE PROJECT ANUARY 201 01700 I 9.A.7 I 0 50 100 0 (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1•'=2( Elevation Table Color Elev. a.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 ].0 Topographic Map FILE N0. SCALE 00 12-51-26 AS SHOWN Y E V 4 a REGAL ACRES - PARCEL B r P ONES'(239)103430333 COLLIER COUNTY FAX: (239) 334-3661 E N G I N E E R I N G E.B. #642 & LEL #142 DATE PROJECT ANUARY 201 01700 I 9.A.7 I 0 50 100 0 (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1•'=2( Elevation Table Color Elev. a.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 ].0 Topographic Map FILE N0. SCALE 00 12-51-26 AS SHOWN Y E V 4 a E LAND SUMMARY USE CATEGORY ACREAGE TOTAL SITE AREA 59.9± PARCEL A 36.75± PARCEL B 23.15± MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 300 D.U. (5 D.U. /AC) PARCEL A 184 D.U. (5 D.U. /AC) PARCEL B 116 D.U. (5 D.U. /AC) REQUIRED / PROVIDED PRESERVE 5.62 PARCEL A (PROVIDED) N/A PARCEL B (PROVIDED) 5.62 OPEN SPACE REQUIRED 36.0 (60%) PARCEL A PROVIDED 22.05 (60%) PARCEL B PROVIDED 13.89 (60%) NATIVE VEGETATION CALCULATIONS THERE WAS NO VEGETATION REQUIREMENT ASSOCIATED WITH PARCEL A NATIVE VEGETATION PARCEL B 22.46 AC 25% PRESERVE REQUIREMENTS 5.62 AC PRESERVE PROVIDED 5.62 AC v VACANT PARCEL A O _I VACANT IR R I F — R R i RIGHT-OF-WAY TYPE 'B' ' /'' `\� LANDSCAPE '(� I L0 AC I PARCEL R B BUFFER ( R \ RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY ce UD R SIDEWALK (TYP) R ,'PRESERVE PRESERVE REGAL ACRES - PARCELB HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY J REC / AREA d TYPE 'B' O LANDSCAPE BUFFER R R MH RESIDENTIAL R M CID MOBILE HOME PARK r UD I JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. W 4 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 IN PHONE: (239) 434-0333 E N G I N E E R I N G E.B. (239) 334-3661 .B. jj(23 & L.B. #642 9.A.7 0 62.5 1® 0 (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1"=250') RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY d L) Q R M CID ti r O O O Iti r O N J a N D IL NOTES: 1. ACREAGES SHOWN ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED (fl ON FINAL DESIGN. �O to f0 r0 LEGEND 2^ PRESERVE AREA i.l. ® WATER MANAGEMENT AREA Y PUD BOUNDARY �• RIGHT-OF-WAY 10 co PUD ADJACENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION LUC ADJACENT LAND USE d E Preliminary Site Plan V w DALE PROJECT N0. FILE N0. SCALE SHEET JANUARY 201 0170078-00 12-51-26 AS SHOWN 5 GREENWAY ROAD REGAL ACRES - PARCEL B HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF �`�j ■��Alt COLLIER COUNTY ENGINEERING I 9.A.7 I 0 62.5 125 25 o (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1"=250') SITE REQUIREMENTS - PARCEL B Total Area 23.15 AC Open 60% Renairea space 23.15AC z.80=13.89 AC Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% 18.28 AC Providetl 1.31 (1.0 AC Lake, 5.6 AC Presenre, + 11.66 AC Oth.,) Native 25% Reaulred Vegefe8on 22.46 AC 20.25=5.82 AC Provided FLUCFCS CODE DESCRIPTION STATUS ACREAGE 261E2 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% N 1.31 261E3 Abandoned Agriculture, Exollcs 50-74% N 1.02 321E1 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 10 — 24% N 1.18 321E2 Palmetto Prairie. Exotics 25 — 49% N L 434E2 U N Q PARCEL B - NATIVE VEGETATION TABLE Hardwood — Conifer Mixed, Exotics 50 — 747 FLUCFCS CODE DESCRIPTION STATUS ACREAGE 261E2 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% N 1.31 261E3 Abandoned Agriculture, Exollcs 50-74% N 1.02 321E1 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 10 — 24% N 1.18 321E2 Palmetto Prairie. Exotics 25 — 49% N 1.70 434E2 Hord ... d — Conifer Mixed, Exotics 25 — 49% N 7.64 434E3 Hardwood — Conifer Mixed, Exotics 50 — 747 N 3.56 643E2 Wet Prci6% Exotics 25 — 49% W 4.52 643E3 Wet Prairie, Exotica 50 — 74% W 1.53 M 0) LL M M ti T Q Q 0 r 0 TOTAL 22.46 N J Please Note: There was no native vegetation requirement associated with PARCEL d N 8WIDAR. RAWDS NOT BEEN AGENCY L"'-NnEO AND SFD-ARE 6BBJE�T To ANIE 1. N'IEI=IIIEAND Ep D AB n�ATo _ EM"('L �i i ooRp g LAND N a NON —LAND nR n_ RAPHE ao R N .X" zz or _N WN NI— .. to LEGEND y M PROJECT BOUNDARY •L FLUCFCS LINE 4364E3 FLUCFCS CODE & ACREAGI 3 Y D NATIVE WETLAND VEGETATIC (±6.05 AC.) m NATIVE UPLAND VEGETATIOl' (±16.41 AC.) = JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT Native Vegetation Map V NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PHONE: 434-031 W (239) FAX: (239) 3L.B. 6 pAIE PROJECT N0. FILE N0. SCALE SHEET 4 E.B. jj642 & L.B. #642 January 2018 0170078-00 12-51-26 AS SHOWN 6 PARCEL B - NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVE TABLE — — GREENWAY ROAD FLUCFCS CODE DESCRIPTION STATE ACREAGE STATUS 434E2 Hardwood —Conifer Mixed. Exotics 25 — 49% N 2.24 43413 Hardwood —Conifer Mixed. Exotics 50 — 74% N 1.62 643E2 Wet Prairie, Exotics 25 — 49% W 0.51 643E3 Wet Prairie. Exotics 50 — 74% W 1.25 TOTAL 5.62 Please Note: There was no native vegetation requirement associated with PARCEL A W = WETLAND SW = SURFACE WATER I 11E KARDE I'D O�BWxDIRI 1— 107 BEERC AGENCI- MTERS InEDSAID ARE SUBJECT TO C—DE 2, "I"EIILIIIE AID DELINEA111 IFlCA7ICN STSIEMA(FLL ..CA) ('DDTl PER THE ID.R), Y C00E ( [1 1 B 9. - BDRrA. -.RD R r DIaT vacANr PARCEL A DR AERIAI 1"11—Al" HDRRDTDDRARB. "D. ND=RER z2 Dr _R I LAND SUMMARY USE CATEGORY ACREAGE TOTAL SITE AREA 59.9± PARCEL A 36.75± PARCEL B 23.15± MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS 300 D.U. (5 D.U. / AC) PARCEL A 184 D.U. (5 D.U. /AC) PARCEL B 116 D.U. (5 D.U. /AC) REQUIRED / PROVIDED PRESERVE 5.62 PARCEL A (PROVIDED) N/A PARCEL B (PROVIDED) 5.62 OPEN SPACE REQUIRED 36.0 (60%) PARCEL A PROVIDED 22.05 (60 PARCEL B PROVIDED 13.89 (60 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY REGAL ACRES - PARCELB I �=moi 0 1 I - I VACANT I I r — � �) -- - -- - - ) AREA �) LAKE / / ,' I/O p.0 A, i I PARCEL B \ \ 15' TYPE LANDSCAPE \ \ BUFFER + • \` ` Pf>�VE AREA UD 434E2 ' 6 3 2 (5.62 AC±j_ • (0.85 AG31 (0.51 AC , 43413 + 46 313 .'4$42 •..�• + 434E3 4$43 + 643 3 ',0.68 AC, (0.19 ACs) (0.75 AC3) . • (0.33 AC3) +'(1.33 AC3J% 0.92 AC3 . .......... PRESERVE UD HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF 0709=1 tr COLLIER COUNTY ENGINEERING J 0 62.5 125 0 (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1"=250') RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY Q� 15' 1. ACREAGES SHOWN ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED (� L) a ~LANDSCAPE BUFFER d' M O LEGEND N O.O6 AC± MH r O O 20 0 ti L - RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME 1 O N J a 4334E3 E N 3 0 D Y IL NOTES: 15' 1. ACREAGES SHOWN ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED (� TYPE 'B' ON FINAL DESIGN. ~LANDSCAPE BUFFER 434E2 LEGEND N O.O6 AC± MH 20 PROJECT BOUNDARY L - RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME 1 FLUCFCS LINE PARK 4334E3 FLUCFCS CODE & ACREAGI 3 Y NATIVE UPLAND VEGETATIOP (± 3.86 AC.) m NATIVE WETLAND VEGETATIC = (± 1.76 AC.) d JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT Preserve Map NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PHONE: 434-0333 � (239) FAX: (239) 334-3661 OAIE 20 ANUARY 1P017ROJECT07 N0. 08-00 FILE N0. SCALE SHEET 12-51-26 AS SHOWN 7 �! Q E.B. jj642 & L.B. #642 I GREENWAY ROAD PARCEL A 514 O.69 ACt) I � I / I j PARCEL B \� 643E2 \ I (1.mnct) 643E2 (2.93ACt) 643E3 0.2] ACt) PRESERVE (5.62 AC±)•, REGAL ACRES - PARCELB HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY ENGINEERING JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. TAN 2350 SFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PHONE: (239) 434-0333 FAX (239) 334-3661 E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 I 9.A.7 I 27 - 0 62.5 125 0 (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1"=250") WETLAND / SW IMPACT TABLE STATE STATUS WETLANDS TOTAL AC. OF FLUCFCS SW 514 0.69 W 643E2 4.03 W 643E3 0.27 TOTAL 4.99 434E3 -6- Wetland Impact Map v t4 .r+ V0. FILE N0. SCALE SHEET �! 6-00 12-51-26 AS SHOWN 8 Q L Q M M ti r O O O ti r O N J a N D a CD co LEGEND y f0 PROJECT BOUNDARY •L FLUCFCS LINE tZ FLUCFCS CODE & ACREAGI 7 Y WETLAND IMPACT (t 4.30 AC.) m SURFACE WATER IMPACT ( 0.69 AC.) = Wetland Impact Map v t4 .r+ V0. FILE N0. SCALE SHEET �! 6-00 12-51-26 AS SHOWN 8 Q ATTACHMENT C PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY 9.A.7 r a Packet Pg. 664 9.A.7 REGAL ACRES PARCEL B Protected Species Survey June 2017 Prepared for: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. Prepared by: ENGINEERING 2350 Stanford Court Naples, Florida 34112 L:A20170000\20170078-000 - Habitat for Humanity (Regal Acres Ph 2)\Environmental\RAI Documents\Protected Species Survev 08312017-a.docx Packet Pg. 665 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS............................................................................ 3 3.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY....................................................................... 8 4.0 RESULTS/DISCUSSION.............................................................................. 11 5.0 REFERENCES.............................................................................................. 20 FIGURES Figure 1 Project Location Map......................................................................... 2 Figure2 Soils Map........................................................................................... 4 Figure 3 FLUCFCS Map.................................................................................. 5 Figure 4 Potential Protected Species Map ........................................................ 10 Figure 5 Protected Species Map....................................................................... 12 Figure 6 Panther Habitat Map......................................................................... 16 TABLES Table 2-1 Vegetation Associations and Acreages .............................................. 3 Table 3-1 Dates, Times, Weather Conditions and Purpose of Field Surveys............................................................................................... 8 Table 3-2 Potential Protected Species................................................................ 9 Table 4-1 Protected Species Summary Sheet ..................................................... 13 Table 4-2 Non -listed Wildlife Observed on the Property .................................. 14 Table 4-3 Panther Habitat Unit Analysis........................................................... 17 -i- 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 666 9.A.7 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey 1.0 INTRODUCTION Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc (HHCC) proposes to expand the existing Regal Acres residential development to include additional property located west of the existing development. The original development (Parcel A) includes approximately 36.75 acres of existing residential use including 184 dwellings. The addition to Regal Acres (Parcel B) project area includes approximately 23.15 acres and is located west of Majestic Circle, approximately 0.67 miles north of US 41. HHCC proposes to construct an additional 116 residential units. The project is located in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida N as with central coordinates of 26°02'55.9" North and 81°39'34.5" West. Please refer to Figure 1 Q for a location map. Land uses surrounding the project area include existing residential to the a, as west, south and east, and vacant residential (with infrastructure) to the north. M Two Johnson Engineering, Inc. ecologists conducted a protected species survey (PSS) on the subject property on March 29, 2017. The PSS was updated on June 19, 2017 to include additional acreage. Pedestrian transects were established to cover approximately 60% of each suitable habitat within the project area. The purpose of the survey was to identify and document the presence of any plant or wildlife species listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) as endangered, threatened, species of special concern, or commercially exploited. This report represents the results of the PSS prepared in accordance with Collier County and FWC approved methods for conducting protected species surveys and for gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrow surveys, as provided in the Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines [FWC, 2017]. -1- Packet Pg. 667 E 0 0 J I 9.A.7 I Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East IVU I CO. Latitude:26° 02' 55.9" N, Longitude: 81 o 39' 34.5" W The aerial photos shown were taken in 2016. STREET MAP N.T.S. m L U a M Cl) ti r O O O r O N J a N ID D a W Iq to d N j: 2 r 'PROJECT LOCATION v m m c PROJECT KINGDOM CT._ 1 LOCATION a MANCHESTER DR KINGDOM CT MANATEE RD T92i/q o a �a LI/ 2 > \z 3 U) Q —Z w C OO W W —W C) °q — O —CAMPANILECIR Z m-� �O SF09 D Cl) Tj�O CECIL RD v =o m p/CA44 N i L -- STREET MAP N.T.S. m L U a M Cl) ti r O O O r O N J a N ID D a W Iq to d N j: 2 r 'PROJECT LOCATION v m m VICINITY AERIAL N.T.S. JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 7 2122 JOHNSON STREET Location Map J H N 3 N P O BOXFLORIDARegal Acres Parcel B Collier County, - FORT MYERO RIDA 33902-1550 PHONE (239) 334-0046 FAX (239) 334-3661 DATE PROJECT FI ria SCALE SHEET E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 April 2017 20170078-000 12-51-26 Not Packet Pg. 668 c m KINGDOM CT._ 1 a VICINITY AERIAL N.T.S. JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 7 2122 JOHNSON STREET Location Map J H N 3 N P O BOXFLORIDARegal Acres Parcel B Collier County, - FORT MYERO RIDA 33902-1550 PHONE (239) 334-0046 FAX (239) 334-3661 DATE PROJECT FI ria SCALE SHEET E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 April 2017 20170078-000 12-51-26 Not Packet Pg. 668 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B Protected Species Survey 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 9.A.7 June 2017 Through mapping and classifying the various vegetative habitats occurring onsite, qualified determinations can be made with regard to the presence of protected species. The cover and vegetation association types within the 23.15 -acre addition were delineated using Collier County 2016 digital aerial photographs, Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) Soil Survey Maps for Collier County (Figure 2), and field observations. The habitat types were classified according to Levels III and IV of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) [Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), 1999]. The resulting FLUCFCS and Protected Species Survey Map is provided in Figure 3. The approximate acreages for the various FLUCFCS Codes within the additional lands can be found in Table 2-1. A brief description of each surveyed FLUCFCS Code follows. Table 2-1: Vegetation Associations and Acreages FLUCFCS Description Acreage Federal Status State Status 261E2 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% 1.31 U U 261E3 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 50-74% 1.02 U U 321E1 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 1-24% 1.18 U U 321E2 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 1.70 U U 434E2 Hardwood -Conifer Mix, Exotics 25-49% 7.64 U U 434E3 Hardwood -Conifer Mix, Exotics 50-74% 3.56 U U 514 Swale 0.69 SW SW 643E2 Wet Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 4.52 W W 643E3 Wet Prairie, Exotics 50-74% 1.53 W W Total 23.15 Legend U = Upland SW = Surface Water W = Wetland -3- a Packet Pg. 669 `\\\ REGAL ACRES PHASE ONE \\ VA \ 20 20 REGAL ACRES PARCEL BI HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY I 9.A.7 I 0 62.5 1® 0 (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1•'=250') \\ N f 3 \ \ \ M r \ \ O l \ O N J a N a to qe Soils Legend Symbol Soil Name Hydric Status 2 Holopaw fine sand, limestone substratum Yes 3 Malabar tine sand Yes 20 Ft drum and malab-, fine sands No 27 Holopaw tine sand Yes 32 Urban land No O N J a N a to qe 32 r •' , LEGEND 1 E PROJECT BOUNDARY HYDRIC SOILS m • � NOTES: I � 1. The aerial shown from Collier County Digital Library and dated: November Z _1� f _ photos a� 2. Soil information based on USDA Soil Survey 1988. Soil description updated 1990. . � I JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 211. 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 Aerial and Soils Map S V IMP PHONE: (239) 434-0333 FAX: (239) 334-3661 ENGINEERING DA E.B. j/642 & L.B. #642 JUNE E PROJECT NO FlLE N0 SCALE s— 2017 12-51-26 AS SHOWN Fi9ure2 +. rj ACa) GREENWAY ROAD - •__••_--4 _ — _. .__ -. e. F; 4,y. .'; ..•fir x. v.... S NATIVE STATE ACREAGE VEGETATION STATUS 261E2 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% .s. EMPEROR LN. 1.31 - _ ' ' •� N 1.02 F �t�-' - I a ._ I "1 to L - w a i - AL Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25 - 49% �� - �• �� 1.70 434E2 i� YES N 7.64 434E3 Hardwood - Conifer Mixed. Exotics 50 - 74% YES N 3.56 514 171 1. NO SW 0.69 643E2 Wet Prairie, Exotic. 25 - 49% y o W 4.52 643E3 MAJESTIC CIR. YES W 1.53 TOTAL 23.15 1111 F s ` { • [� �� 1 REGAL ACRES PHASE ONE' MAJESTIC CIR. _ I xn�Y, � 261E2 j j AX0 � i . �� w �� '•may _ E2 643E2 643E2 ACt) ._ i (1.59 ACT) ':. �6' / (2 ) .. 0i,_ -i 'j � � � f • � � �. 321E2 �� -tj _� -■ �� KifIf 643E3 434E2 643E3 434E3 #!'. F' (0.34 ACx) (1.72 AL3) (111 Al, / "•' y� E I 9.A.7 I 0 62.5 125 D (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1"=250') REGAL ACRES PHASE ONE FLUCFCS STATE CODE DESCRIPTION STATUS ACREAGE 120 1 EXIS'nW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT N 36.75 TOTAL 36.75 REGAL ACRES PHASE TWO FLUCFCS CODE DESCRIPTION NATIVE STATE ACREAGE VEGETATION STATUS 261E2 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% YES N 1.31 261E3 Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 50-749. YES N 1.02 321E1 Palmetto Prairi, Exotics 1 - 24% YES N 1.18 321E2 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25 - 49% YES N 1.70 434E2 Hardwood - Conifer Mixed. Exotics 25 - 497 YES N 7.64 434E3 Hardwood - Conifer Mixed. Exotics 50 - 74% YES N 3.56 514 Swale NO SW 0.69 643E2 Wet Prairie, Exotic. 25 - 49% YES W 4.52 643E3 Wet Prairie, Exotics 50 - 74% YES W 1.53 TOTAL 23.15 C"E IFICA71M snTEM2 NON— ANN X(FnuaOsj (MOT 99g). use coVF - MS,CAoaap RE—O EW - SURFACE MTER Legend Project Boundary FLUCFCS ® SFWMDWelland5(6.05AC) EM SFWMD Surface Water (0.69 AC) JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. M2350 STANFORD COURT HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF tNAPLES, FLORIDA 3x112 REGAL ACRES PARCEL B PHONE: (239) x34-0333 FAx COLLIER COUNTY : (z3s) 33a-366, E N G I N E E R I N G E.B. "642 & L.B. "642 Aerial and FLUCFCS Map a N IL CD y f0 0 3 Y co W I_ E V iFig.. �! Figure 3 Q 9.A.7 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey FLUCFCS Code 261E2: Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 25-49% (1.31 acres) The abandoned agriculture cover code is a remnant of row crops that once existed on the eastern side of the project area and continued onto property to the east. 2004 aerial photographs from Google Earth show the remnant agricultural rows and swales. Currently, this cover type is comprised of earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii) in the canopy. Midstory species include earleaf acacia and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolus). Ground cover is limited due to the dense coverage of exotic species, but includes muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) and other herbs and forbs that can withstand reduced sunlight. FLUCFCS Code 261E3: Abandoned Agriculture, Exotics 50-74% (1.02 acres) This cover code is similar that that described above, except that the coverage of exotic species increases to between 50 and 74%. Earleaf acacia and melaleuca dominate the canopy with scattered cabbage palm and slash pine. Midstory species include earleaf acacia and Brazilian pepper. Ground cover is nearly absent, but includes muscadine, swamp fern, and other herbs and forbs that can withstand reduced sunlight. FLUCFCS Code 321E1: Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 10 — 24% (1.18 acres) This upland habitat includes widely scattered slash pine, melaleuca and earleaf acacia in the canopy. Midstory species include saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), gallberry (Ilex glabra) and coastalplain staggerbush (Lyonia fruticosa). Groundcover species include wiregrass (Aristida stricta), pawpaw (Asimina reticulata), bogbuttons (Lachnocaulon anceps) and drumheads (Polygala sp.). FLUCFCS Code 321E2: Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25 - 49% (1.70 acres) This upland habitat includes widely scattered slash pine with up to 49% coverage of exotic species such as melaleuca and earleaf acacia in the canopy. Midstory species include saw palmetto, gallberry and coastalplain staggerbush. Groundcover species include wiregrass, pawpaw, bogbuttons and drumheads. '.o Packet Pg. 672 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey FLUCFCS Code 434E2: Hardwood — Conifer Mix, Exotics 25 — 49% (7.64 acres) This forested upland habitat type includes slash pine, live oak (Quercus virginiana), cabbage palm, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia in the canopy, with exotic vegetation covering up to 49%. Midstory vegetation includes saw palmetto, gallberry and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera). Ground cover is comprised of wiregrass, muscadine and swamp fern. FLUCFCS Code 434E3: Hardwood — Conifer Mix, Exotics 50 — 74% (3.56 acres) This forested upland habitat type is similar to FLUCFCS Code 434E2 described above, however coverage of exotic species such as melaleuca and earleaf acacia is up to 74%. FLUCFCS Code 514: Swale, (0.69 acres) This surface water runs from north to south near the eastern property line and empties into the canal located south of the project. Vegetation within the swale is sparse, but includes cabbage palm, earleaf acacia and melaleuca in the canopy. Brazilian pepper occupies the midstory. Groundcover is nearly absent. FLUCFCS Code 643E2: Wet Prairie, Exotics 25 — 49% (4.52 acres) This disturbed wetland community has been isolated from historic hydrologic patterns through the construction of the swale to the east, residential development with perimeter berms to the north and west, and the canal to the south. The canopy is predominantly composed of melaleuca with scattered slash pine, live oak, cabbage palm and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum). Removal of the canopy exotics would result in less than 10% canopy closure, lending to the classification of wet prairie instead of a forested habitat code. Midstory and groundcover vegetation are sparse, but include Brazilian pepper, swamp fern, sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), and blue maidencane (Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum). FLUCFCS Code 643E3: Wet Prairie, Exotics 50 - 74% (1.53 acres) This disturbed wetland community is similar to 643E2 described above, however exotic species such as earleaf acacia, melaleuca, and Brazilian pepper cover up to 74%. -7- 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 673 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B Protected Species Survey 3.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY 9.A.7 June 2017 The PSS included field surveys and a literature review. Field surveys were conducted utilizing pedestrian belt transects. Transects were performed in all vegetation associations (FLUCFCS) and the distances between transects were established to cover a minimum of 60% of each habitat type within the project area. The PSS was conducted in accordance with standard FWC survey guidelines as well as methods outlined in the Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines [FWC, 2017]. Table 3-1 lists the times and weather conditions during the field survey. Table 3-1 Dates, Times, Weather Conditions and Purpose of Field Surveys. Date Time Weather Conditions Purpose Dtaff 3/29/2017 9:00 a.m. — 4:30 p.m. Mostly sunny, Temperature mid 70s F PSS AGN Winds from ENE at 5 - 10 mph. JOC 6/19/2017 12:00 p.m. — 3:00 P.m. Cloudy, Temperature in the mid 80s F, PSS AGN Winds from SE at 10 mph. AGN — A. Gary Nychyk JOC — John Curtis Literature review sources included Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern [FWC, 2017], Florida Natural Areas Inventory [FNAI], U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS), as well as the Collier County Land Development Code. Based on the literature review, a compilation of federal and state protected species was developed. Table 3-2 lists potential listed species commonly associated with the vegetative communities observed onsite. Figure 4 provides an analysis of potential protected species for the project area, based on documented occurrences of listed species and consultation zones available from the previously mentioned agencies. a Packet Pg. 674 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B Protected Species Survey Table 3-2 Potential Protected Species. June 2017 Upland Prairie FLUCFCS Potential Protected Species (Common Name) Potential Protected Species (Scientific name) Status Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus ST Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais couperi FT 261E2 Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus ST 261 E3 321E1 Florida Sandhill Crane Antigone canadensis pratensis ST 321E2 Florida Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia floridana ST Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus ST Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi FE Upland Forest Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais couperi FT Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus ST Red -Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis FE Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus FE Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi FE 434E2 434E3 Cowhorn Orchid Cyrtopodium punctatum SE Butterfly Orchid Encyclia tampensis SC Stiff Leaved Wild Pine Tillandsia fasciculate SE Giant Wild Pine, Giant Air Plant Tillandsia utriculata SE Fuzzy-wuzzy Air Plant Tillandsia pruinosa SE Twisted Air Plant Tillandsia flexuosa ST Wetlands and Surface Waters American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis FT (S/A) American Crocodile Crocodylus acutus FT Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon carais couperi FT Florida Pine Snake Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus ST Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea ST 514 Reddish Egret Egretta rufescens ST 643E2 643E3 Roseate Spoonbill Platalea ajaja ST Tricolored Heron Egretta tricolor ST Wood Stork Mycteria americana FT Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ST Florida Bonneted Bat Eumops floridanus FE Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi FE Legend: S — State of Florida F — Federal T — Threatened E — Endangered C — Commercially Exploited S/A — Similarity in Appearance 91 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 675 LEGEND Habitat for Humanity 7 Collier County Florida Me JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PHONE(239)434-0333 ENGINEERING FAX (239) 334J661 E.B. #642 8 L.B. #642 Bonneted bat focal area DATE PROJECT NO FILE NO SCALE SHEET A.gu 2017 201700]&000 - As Shown Figure 4 (USFWS, 2013) Bonneted bat consultation area (USFWS, 2013) Combined Woodstork foraging areas Jcore (see Note 2) (USFWS, 2010) 0 Eagle nests (FFWCC, 2015) Wading bird colony observations (USFWS, 2007) Scrub jay locations (FFWCC, 1993) RCW general locations . (FFWCC, 2005) consultation area JRCW (USFWS, 2003) Black bear locations / nuisance reports (FFWCC, 2007 / 2014) x Bear road kills (FFWCC, 2015) Panther primary zone (USFWS, 2007) Panther secondary zone (USFWS, 2007) Panther telemetry • (USFWS, 2016) x Panther road kills (FFWCC, 2017) �,rrw • \ a, b J • A Y �..o M • __a:� o ; rte• - .x[�F,,. G.; Q G►. THOMASSON DR G RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK rV.. .;� • t ¢ • 0 0.625 1.25 , • n \ VA SCALE IN MILESSol 0 r9 O• • ` 'u'; fy: 2�"16, • M j Guffof M rco Species / layers checked include those shown and: -Caracara roosts (Dwyer, 2013) -Caracara gathering areas (USFWS, 2007) -Caracara nests (Morrison, 2014) -Caracara nests & observations (USFWS, 2010) -Caracara consultation area (USFWS, 3/2007) -Scrub jay locations (USFWS, 2011) NOTES 1. The aerial photographs shown were provided by Collier County government and were taken in 2012. 2. The core foraging areas for Woodstork colonies 619310, Corkscrew and North Catherine Island II cross into the five -mile buffer. Individual core foraging area boundaries are not shown for clarity. I 9.A.7 I vv\vwvv\ •� A '��A \�\�R�.• • N • !�\�\�\\ VA�V\x Ai� IC • f Vii.AA\ - - - -�_ �VC\�\ VAAVAV`\ V M Ali • • • \\\\•L\\\\\ _ARGEtS_ Ar \� VA--__----___�------ - •rL �\ VAS :�vAy . O • , \ __ INTERIOR -OF COMBINED \• ,_ —WOODSTORKiCORE.--- � 0 _ _-_ z �•• � _—�:��1--.+----FORAGING AREA --- • • 0 \ • � • M ��'c--_ ._a _—_____-____ _--_ _ ice` VA \ • A _ � O 3111 � --_Z Z-_----= I\ 1 --•___ - --- \ �,�r• ,• VA eA VA ?y • 7'7A f� 4 •i • A VA\ 2-'\- 16— SOF fir,-; ` +i►. { 1 • \\ \\ \ r BONNETED BAT BONNETED BAT FOCALAREA CONSULTATION AREA • REGAL A / RES PARCEL RCET Tn till\�.J Itil�l. L t7 Habitat for Humanity 7 Collier County Florida Me JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PHONE(239)434-0333 ENGINEERING FAX (239) 334J661 E.B. #642 8 L.B. #642 Documented Occurrences of Listed Snecit t' � yr DATE PROJECT NO FILE NO SCALE SHEET A.gu 2017 201700]&000 - As Shown Figure 4 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B Protected Species Survey 4.0 RESULTS/DISCUSSION 9.A.7 June 2017 Table 4-1 summarizes the findings of the PSS performed for the Regal Acres Parcel B project. The Protected Species Survey Map is provided as Figure 5 and includes a depiction of pedestrian transects. Several non -listed species were also observed during the PSS and are outlined in Table 4-2. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Gopher tortoises are listed as Threatened by the State and as a candidate species for possible federal listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by FWS. Gopher tortoises are most often found on well -drained sandy soils in upland habitats with low -growing herbs. No signs of gopher tortoises or their burrows were observed during the survey. Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) The eastern indigo snake is listed as Threatened by both FWS and FWC. Eastern indigo snakes utilize a variety of habitat types to complete their life cycles including: pine flatwoods, scrub areas, hydric pine flatwoods, wet and dry prairies, agricultural fields, coastal hardwood hammocks, mangrove areas and even human altered areas can be considered habitat for the species (FWS 1999). In south Florida, the species is not as dependent on gopher tortoise burrows for over -wintering. However, they will use gopher tortoise burrows as underground refugia. In addition, the species will use armadillo burrows, natural ground holes, hollows at the base of trees, ground litter, and debris piles. Steiner et al. (1983) suggest that eastern indigo snakes in south Florida prefer hammock type environments and pine forests. No eastern indigo snakes were observed during the PSS. However, based on the habitat types referenced in the FWS' "South Florida Multi -Species Recovery Plan", vegetation communities within the project area could provide potential habitat for this species. Compliance with the USFWS eastern indigo snake protection measures during construction will ensure this species is not adversely affected by the project. -11- Packet Pg. 677 9.A.7 N 0 100 200 Feet rs �� + .1'Legend Project Boundary 50'Transect lines Snag Nest ------ - - - - -- -�= - - f. -------------------- --------------------------------- A, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I r-- ---------------- - - -------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,p x Y NOTES: The aerial photos shown from Collier County Digital Library and dated: January 2016. JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. Protected Species Map 2122 JOHNSON STREET Y Y P.O. BOX 1550 Regal Acres Parcel B - - FORT MYERS, FLORIDA 33902-1550 PHONE (239) 334-0046 FAX (239) 334-3661 DATE PROJECT FILE NO. SCALE SHEET E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 July 2017 20170078-000 12-51-26 As Packet Pg. 678 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B Protected Species Survey Table 4-1 Protected Species Survey Results. June 2017 Upland Prairie FLUCFCS Potential Protected Species (Common Name) Present Absent Density Gopher Tortoise X Eastern Indigo Snake X 261E2 Florida Pine Snake X 261E3 321E1 Florida Sandhill Crane X 321E2 Florida Burrowing Owl X Southeastern American Kestrel X Florida Panther X Upland Forest 11111111110 iq� 06 Eastern Indigo Snake X Florida Pine Snake X Red -Cockaded Woodpecker X Big Cypress Fox Squirrel X Florida Bonneted Bat X 434E2 Florida Panther X 434E3 Cowhorn Orchid X Butterfly Orchid X Stiff Leaved Wild Pine X Giant Wild Pine, Giant Air Plant X Fuzzy-wuzzy Air Plant X Twisted Air Plant X Wetlands and Surface Waters American Alligator X American Crocodile X Eastern Indigo Snake X Florida Pine Snake X Little Blue Heron X 514 Reddish Egret X 643E2 643E3 Roseate Spoonbill X Tricolored Heron X Wood Stork X Big Cypress Fox Squirrel X Florida Bonneted Bat X Florida Panther X -13- 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 679 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B Protected Species Survey Table 4-2. Non -listed Wildlife Observed on the Property Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) 9.A.7 June 2017 The Big Cypress fox squirrel is listed by FWC as Threatened; it is not listed by FWS. Preferred Big Cypress fox squirrel habitat consists of pine flatwoods, mixed hardwood -pine forest, and cypress swamp, with low ground cover. Big Cypress fox squirrels are known to use several habitat types for foraging, including golf courses, pastures with scattered trees and rural residential areas with wooded lots (Florida Committee on Rare and Endangered Plants and Animals — FCREPA 1992). Big Cypress fox squirrels build platform nests in slash pines and hardwoods (i.e. oak) and moss and stick nests in cypress and tops of cabbage palms. During the PSS, ecologists searched for Big Cypress fox squirrels, their nests, or other signs Two stick nests were observed in melaleuca trees during the PSS. During environmental resource permitting, regulatory agencies may request monitoring of the nests to confirm whether they are Big Cypress fox squirrel nests or the non -listed eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). If the nests are of fox squirrel origin and actively used by fox squirrel young, FWC typically requires that a buffer having a radius of approximately 125 feet be cordoned off around the tree using enviro-fence with no construction in this buffer area being performed until the fox squirrel young leaves the nest. If needed, prior to conducting any nest removal, FWC Division of Wildlife will be contacted for guidance and to obtain the appropriate approvals and permits. -14- Packet Pg. 680 Scientific Name Common Name Birds Quiscalus quiscula Common grackle Mimus polyglottos Northern mockingbird Hylatomus pileatus Pileated woodpecker Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow Zenaida macroura Mourning dove Melaner es carolinus Redbellied woodpecker Mammals Lontra canadensis River otter Dasypus novemcinctus Nine -banded armadillo Procyon lotor Raccoon Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) 9.A.7 June 2017 The Big Cypress fox squirrel is listed by FWC as Threatened; it is not listed by FWS. Preferred Big Cypress fox squirrel habitat consists of pine flatwoods, mixed hardwood -pine forest, and cypress swamp, with low ground cover. Big Cypress fox squirrels are known to use several habitat types for foraging, including golf courses, pastures with scattered trees and rural residential areas with wooded lots (Florida Committee on Rare and Endangered Plants and Animals — FCREPA 1992). Big Cypress fox squirrels build platform nests in slash pines and hardwoods (i.e. oak) and moss and stick nests in cypress and tops of cabbage palms. During the PSS, ecologists searched for Big Cypress fox squirrels, their nests, or other signs Two stick nests were observed in melaleuca trees during the PSS. During environmental resource permitting, regulatory agencies may request monitoring of the nests to confirm whether they are Big Cypress fox squirrel nests or the non -listed eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). If the nests are of fox squirrel origin and actively used by fox squirrel young, FWC typically requires that a buffer having a radius of approximately 125 feet be cordoned off around the tree using enviro-fence with no construction in this buffer area being performed until the fox squirrel young leaves the nest. If needed, prior to conducting any nest removal, FWC Division of Wildlife will be contacted for guidance and to obtain the appropriate approvals and permits. -14- Packet Pg. 680 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B Protected Species Survey Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi) June 2017 The northwestern corner of the Regal Acres Parcel B project (approximately 2.22 acres) is located in the Panther Primary Zone as set forth by FWC, while the remaining 20.93 acres is within the Panther Secondary Zone (Figure 6). A preliminary analysis of impacts to panther habitat has been performed resulting in the Panther Habitat Unit (PHU) Analysis (Table 4-3). This table is preliminary in nature and must be reviewed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The USACE permitting process will serve as the federal nexus for review of potential habitat impacts by the USFWS under Section 7 Consultation of the Endangered Species Act. Any required mitigation for the loss of habitat will be provided at a federally approved mitigation and/or conservation bank located in primary panther habitat. Florida Black Bear (Ursa americanus floridanus) The Florida black bear is one of three (3) subspecies of American black bear recognized in the southeastern United States. It is no longer listed by the FWC. This species can be found in a variety of habitats, including mixed hardwood pine, cabbage palm hammock, upland oak scrub, and forested wetlands, such as cypress and riverine swamps. Acorns, nuts, berries and other native vegetation comprise the primary diet of this species. One objective of the Black Bear Management Plan (FWC, 2012) is to reduce human -bear conflicts. "Eliminating food sources that attract bears is the first and most important action to resolve problems." (FWC 2012) To help reduce human -bear conflicts, Homeowners and residents will be instructed to: store trash in a secure area until morning of pickup; bring pet food inside and store securely; protect gardens, compost and livestock with fencing or other appropriate measures; clean grills and store them in a secure area; and remove wildlife feeders when a bear is in the area. A black bear management plan is included as Attachment D of the Collier County EIS. -15- 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 681 } 0 100 200 64 4 4 SCALE IN FEET E 643E3 l . � x.514- 261 E3 I��0 4 ELLl L U LEGEND N Project Boundary r � 434E2 FLUCFCS Polygon & Code _ Wetland r o 0 Surface Water, c W, 77 7719 4' Ey �C d N NOTES Q 1. The Panther primary and secondary PROJ ECT d zones shown were provided by USFWS. BOUNDARY 2. The FLUCFCS. wetland and Surface 4 Water polygons shown have not been GPS located, have not been agency verified and r. are subject to change. 3. Nomenclature and delineations as per N the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms 261 E2 Classification System (FLUCFCS) (FDOT, 1999). 4. Abbreviations N = Non -wetland 21 E1 '� CL W = Wetland " 7 SW = Surface Water�'� Y 5. The aerial photograph shown was provided by Collier County government and '434E3 , m was taken in 2016. }; C FLUCFCS TABLE PANTHER PRIMARY ZONE - - " U FLUCFCS Description Slalus Area In y 4' I�•F +�+ 434E2 Hardvroad -conifer mixed, exotics 2549% N acro 8 ,r ` g Lu a 434E3 Hardwood - conifer mixed, exotics 50-74% N 1.29 643E2 Wet made, exotics 2549% X W <0.01 �643E3 Wet prairie, exotics 50.74% W 0.12 t p E '!Zr r• • .:', Panther Primary Zone Total 2.22 PANTHER SECONDARY ZONE :EAN REEF LN }T yy _ FLUCFCS q ! _ a r Description Status Area In .j .-�� - k — j�, �� Code acres ,4� v� �� •�� - '40 -ft 261E2 Abandoned agriculture, exotics 2549% N 1.31 "b 261E3 Abandoned agriculture, exotics 50-74% N 1.02 •• - r ; ' r ' n �'1 r 321111 Palmetto prairie, exotics 1-24% N 1.18 321112 Palmetto prairie, exotics 2549% N 1.70 1 Jr • _> +t 434E2 Hardmod - conifer mixed, exotics 2549% N 6.83 434E3 Hardvrood - conifer mixed, exotics 50-74% N 2.27 Yq 514 Swale SW 0.69 643E2 Wet prairie, exotics 2549% W 4. ' - 643E3 Wet purine, exotics 50.74% W 1.41 Panther Secondary Zone Total 28.93 Primary & Secondary Zone Total 23.15 JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. Panther Impact Ma 2350 STANFORD COURT p p M NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 Regal Acres Parcel B PHONE (239) 434-0333 E N G I N E R I N G FAX (239) 334-3661 DATE PROJECT FILE NO. SCALE 17,ET E.B. #642 & L.B. #1642 August 2017 20170078-000 — As Packet Pg. 682 HHCC - Regal Acres Parcel B Protected Species Survey Table 4-3: Panther Habitat Unit Analysis 9.A.7 June 2017 FLUCFCS Code Description Component Acres in Panther Primary Zone Component Acres in Panther Secondary Zone FWS Assigned Habitat Value per Acre Primary PHU's' (Primary Acres x Hab. Val. X 1.0) Secondary PHU's (Secondary Acres x Hab. Val. x 0.69) Abandoned Agriculture, 261E2 Exotics 25-49% 0.00 0.83 5.7 0.00 3.25 Avg. 37% Exotics 0.00 0.48 3.0 0.00 1.00 Abandoned Agriculture, 261E3 Exotics 50-74% 0.00 0.39 5.7 0.00 1.52 Avg. 62% Exotics 0.00 0.63 3.0 0.00 1.31 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 1- 321 E 1 24% 0.00 1.03 6.3 0.00 4.49 Avg. 12.5% Exotics 0.00 0.15 3.0 0.00 0.31 Palmetto Prairie, Exotics 25-49% 0.00 1.07 6.3 0.00 4.66 321E2 Avg. 37% Exotics 0.00 0.63 3.0 0.00 1.30 Hardwood -Conifer Mix, 434E2 Exotics 25-49% 0.51 4.30 9.3 4.75 27.61 Avg. 37% Exotics 0.30 2.53 3.0 0.90 5.23 Hardwood -Conifer Mix, 434E3 Exotics 50-74% 0.49 0.86 9.3 4.56 5.54 Avg. 62% Exotics 0.80 1.41 3.0 2.40 2.91 514 Swale 0.00 0.69 0.0 0.00 0.00 Wet Prairie, Exotics 25- 643E2 49% 0.00 2.85 4.7 0.00 9.23 Avg. 37% Exotics 0.00 1.67 3.0 0.00 3.46 Wet Prairie, Exotics 50- 643E3 74% 0.05 0.54 4.7 0.21 1.74 _Ayg. 62% Exotics 0.07 0.87 3.0 0.22 1.81 TOTAL 2.22 20.93 13.04 75.37 88.41 *Note: 88.41 PHUs x 2.5 = 221.02 Required Offsite PHUs to Mitigate Project Impacts Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus) Florida bonneted bats are listed as Endangered by FWS. Florida bonneted bats are the largest species of bat in Florida. Although little is known about the habitat preferences of the Florida bonneted bat, evidence indicates that open freshwater and wetland habitats provide prime foraging areas. Roost sites have been observed in artificial bat boxes, roof tiles, and within woodpecker cavities in pines with an open midstory. The project area is within the FWS -17- L U a d M M ti 0 0 0 0 N J R_ N D a 0 CO N 2 cv CL v 00 c as E V 2 a Packet Pg. 683 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey designated Focal Area of the Florida Bonneted Bat. During the PSS, one potential roost tree was observed with a cavity as shown in Figure 5. However, during the survey a pileated woodpecker (Hylatomus pileatus) was observed flying to and from the cavity. Regulatory agencies may require an acoustic survey for Florida bonneted bats during the permitting process. Wading/Marsh Birds No evidence of wading bird rookeries was observed during the surveys. Most of the listed wading bird species common in Florida are transitory in nature, and can be found foraging and roosting in a wide variety of wetland habitats. Although not observed during the PSS, the little blue heron (Egretta caer ulea), reddish egret (Egretta rufescens), roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja) and tricolored heron (Egretta tricolor) may occasionally utilize nearby wetlands either seasonally or year around for foraging purposes. A wading bird management plan has been included as Attachment E of the Collier County EIS to ensure no direct impacts to listed wading birds occur at time of construction. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Although the bald eagle is no longer a listed species, it is afforded protection in accordance with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The FWS has established a standard 660' secondary and 330' primary protection zone around a bald eagle nest for this region [FWS 2007]. Based on the FWC bald eagle nest locator (https://publictemp.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/nestlocator.gVx , site accessed August, 2017) No active bald eagle nests were documented on or within 660' of the project site. The closest known nest is CO -037, located approximately 1.39 miles southeast of the project site. This distance exceeds any protection zones for bald eagles. Red -Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) The red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) is about seven inches long with a wingspan of about 15 inches and is listed as endangered by the USFWS. This black and white striped woodpecker has a black cap and nape that encircle large white cheek patches. RCWs typically inhabit open pine forests and are the only woodpeckers that excavate cavities exclusively in living pine trees. RCWs typically choose large, mature pines to excavate their cavity. The protected species me 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 684 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B Protected Species Survey June 2017 survey revealed no indications the property was being used by RCWs. Additionally, the property lacks the open mature pine trees preferred by RCWs. Therefore no adverse effects to RCWs are anticipated as a result of this project. -19- 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 685 HHCC — Regal Acres Parcel B June 2017 Protected Species Survey 5.0 REFERENCES Florida Committee on Rare and Endangered Plans and Animals. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume I. Mammals. Gainesville, Florida. 392 pp. Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Third Edition. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2011. Supplemental Information for the Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Biological Status Review Report. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2017. Bald Eagle Nest Locator. htlps://public.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/nestlocator.aspx (Site accessed June 1, 2017) Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2017. Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species. http://myfwc.com/media/ 15 1525 1 /threatened_ endangered_species.pdf (Site accessed June 1, 2017) Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2017. Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines. Tallahassee, Florida. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Soil Survey of Collier County, Florida. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. hqps://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/qpp/WebSoilSurvey.aspx (Site accessed June 1, 2017) Steiner, T.M., O.L. Bass, Jr., and J.A. Kushlan. 1983. Status of the eastern indigo snake in southern Florida National Parks and vicinity. South Florida Research Center Report SFRC-83/01, Everglades National Park; Homestead, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Information for Planning and Conservation, Environmental Conservation Online System. 2017. hgp:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/ eg ttingStarted/index (Site accessed June 1, 2017) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. 23 pp. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. South Florida Multi -Species Recovery Plan. Atlanta, Georgia. 2172 pp. -20- 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 686 ATTACHMENT D FLORIDA BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 687 9.A.7 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY REGAL ACRES PARCEL B FLORIDA BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN No signs of Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) were observed during any of the surveys or site visits to the property. However, sightings of the Florida black bear have been reported to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission within the project vicinity. To reduce the potential for human -bear encounters and help protect the black bear, the following measures will be taken at the Regal Acres Parcel B development: During Construction: a. The construction contractor will post a copy of the `Be Bear Aware" pamphlet produced by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission in construction trailers to advise employees and contractors of the potential for bear encounters in the area. b. Garbage cans will be stored within a secure structure until the morning before garbage collection. After Construction a. Homeowners should receive a copy of the `Be Bear Aware" pamphlet produced by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission upon moving into the neighborhood. b. Garbage cans should be stored within a secure structure until the morning before garbage collection, or bear -proof containers should be used Should a bear be encountered within the development, it should be left undisturbed so that it can continue to its destination. However, if a bear continues to remain in the development for several hours, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission will be contacted so that they can provide appropriate action to assist the bear out of the development. Under no condition is the bear to be disturbed, harmed, molested or fed. d. Bear relocation will only be used as a last resort if the bear continues to return and become a nuisance. All bear encounters are not considered a nuisance or a threat, unless they remain in the area for long periods or time, and continue to return over several days. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission is responsible for determining the status of the bear and what action is necessary. Packet Pg. 688 ATTACHMENT E WADING BIRD MANAGEMENT PLAN 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 689 9.A.7 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY REGAL ACRES PARCEL B WADING BIRD MANAGEMENT PLAN Although the PSS did not reveal the use of the project area by wading birds, the wetland communities and onsite ditch provide foraging opportunities for listed wading birds during the rainy season when inundated. The canal on the southern portion of the property likely provides foraging opportunities for a longer period of time due to the longer hydroperiod of the canal. Wetland impacts associated with the development will be mitigated through the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) permit processes. The loss of wading bird habitat associated with the development will also be mitigated through the purchase of wetland credits, as determined through those permits. Although no direct impacts to the nesting potential of these bird species are anticipated in association with the project, a management plan geared specifically toward enhancing remaining on-site wetland habitats in the preserve and thereby augmenting foraging opportunities for listed wading birds will be implemented at time of development. The conceptual site plan illustrates a 5.62 acre preserve located in the western portion of the property, which is comprised of 3.86 acres of upland habitat and 1.76 acres of herbaceous wetlands. The preserve areas will be maintained free of exotic and nuisance vegetation in perpetuity, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council's 2017 List of Invasive Plant Species, Categories I and II. Additionally, the preserve area will be placed under a conservation easement granted to the SFWMD. Additionally, the southern canal will remain post - development. The enhancement/preservation and maintenance of site wetlands will provide higher quality habitat for use by listed wading birds where use presently is expected to be minimal due to encroachment by exotic vegetation. Prior to construction, if clearing occurs during nesting season of wading birds (January — June), pre -construction nesting surveys will be conducted by a qualified biologist/ecologist to determine if there are any active nests that may be affected by the proposed project. Prior to commencement of clearing activities in wetlands, pedestrian transects will be conducted through all marshes, lake littoral areas, and the forested areas around the perimeter of marshes within the development footprint to ensure that no active nests are taken during construction. If an active nest is discovered within the project area, a buffer having a radius of approximately 125' (500' buffer for the Florida sandhill crane) will be cordoned off around the nest using enviro-fence. Activities will not begin within the buffer area until the project biologist determines that all young have left the nest and the nest is deemed inactive Packet Pg. 690 9.A.7 Exotic eradication will be accomplished by hand including the use of implements such as chainsaws, axes, and machetes to cut down exotic vegetation. Smaller exotic vegetation will be eradicated through complete removal or cut and treat methods. Stumps of cut plants will be chemically treated within 15 minutes of cutting. Only EPA -approved herbicides will be utilized and a visual tracer dye will be added if not already contained in the specific herbicide mixture. All herbicides will be applied in accordance with label specifications. Such applications will be conducted by or under the direction of an appropriately licensed applicator. Debris generated during exotic removal will be transported off-site for disposal. Additional wading bird foraging habitat will be provided through lake littoral planting areas, as required by Collier County LDC. The lake shorelines will be planted with native wetland herbaceous plants in various locations providing shelter to fish and invertebrates, thereby enhancing foraging opportunities for protected wading birds. Packet Pg. 691 I 9.A.7 I a L V HISTORICALIARCHEOLOG_ICAL SURVEY OR WAIVER Q Packet Pg. 692 COLLIER COUNTY WAIVER APPLICATION FROM THE REQUIRED HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT DATE SUBMITTED: PLANNER: PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE WAIVER: PL20170001733 (To Be Completed By Zoning and Land Development Review Staff) PROJECT NAME: Regal Acres RPUD (Parcel B LOCATION: (Common Description) The subject property is located on the west side of Greenway Road, approximately 31/2 miles east of Collier Boulevard (C.R.951)and approximately one mile north of U.SA1. SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: This request is to waive historic and archaeological survey and assessment due to characteristics of the property. (Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Community Development & Environmental Services Administrator County Manager or designee to waive the requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment. Once the waiver application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and acted upon within five (5) working days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate that the area has low potential for historical/archaeological sites.) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 693 SECTION ONE: APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DATA A. Name of applicant (s) (if other than property owner, state relationship such as option holder, contract purchaser, lessee, trustee, etc.): Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. (owner of folios 00737760008, 00741080606, 00738280008, and 00741100104; contract purchaser of folio 00737720006.) Mailing Address: 11145 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34113 Phone: (239) 775-0036 E -Mail: FAX: B. Name of agent(s) for applicant, if any: Laura DeJohn, AICP, Johnson Engineering, Mailing Address: 2350 Stanford Court, Naples, FL 34112 Phone: (239) 334-0046 E -Mail: ldej ohn(a�j ohnsoneng. com FAX: (239) 334-3661 C. Name of owner(s) of property: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. (owner of folios 00737760008. 00741080606. 00738280008. and 00741100104: GHU, LLC, Ronald Monachino, and Newell Creek, LLC (owners of folio 00737720006. Mailing Address: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc., 11145 Tamiami Trail East Na les FL 34113 GHU, LLC, Ronald Monachino, and Newell Creek, LLC, 8654 Camelot Dr., Chesterland OH 44026-3104 Phone: ( E -Mail: FAX: Note: If names in answers to A and/or B are different than name in C, notarized letter(s) of authorization from property owner (C) must be attached. See attached notarized authorizations from Habitat for Humanity; GHU, LLC; and Newell Creek, LLC. Refer to owner documentation for Ronald Monachino in Submittal 2 dated 1/19/18 for PL20170001733. Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 694 SECTION TWO: SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA (Attach copy of the plat book page (obtainable from Clerk's Office at the original scale) with subject property clearly marked.) A. Legal description of subject property. Answer only 1 or 2, as applicable. 1. Within platted subdivision, recorded in official Plat Books of Collier County. Subdivision Name: n/a Plat Book Page Unit Block Lot Section Township Range 2. If not in platted subdivision, a complete legal description must be attached which is sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property on County maps or aerial photographs. The legal description must include the Section, Township and Range. If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description may describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has the right to reject any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property, and may require a certified survey or boundary sketch to be submitted. See attached Legal Description and Boundary Survey. B. Property dimensions: Area: 1,008,414 square feet, or 23.15 (Parcel B) acres Width along roadway: + 1,383 feet (Parcel A frontagealongGreenway Road) Depth: + 680 feet C. Present use of property: Development PARCEL B is 23.15 acres and currend vacant. D. Present zoning classification: PARCEL B is zoned Rural Agricultural (A), subject to request for rezoningto Acres RPUD. Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 3 Packet Pg. 695 SECTION THREE: WAIVER CRITERIA Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has been excavated. A. Waiver Request Justification. 1. Interpretation of Aerial Photograph A majority of the site is vegetated with exotics. Remnant agricultural ditches are also present. 2. Historical Land Use Description: Previous uses in this vicinity were farm field. The site it currently vacant and has not been cleared for several years. The site is not near any known resources and not within an area of historical/archaeological _ probability. 3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: The site is comprised of Abandoned Agriculture, Palmetto Prairie, Hardwood -Conifer Mix, and We Prairie, all of which are disturbed from 10% to 74% with exotics. Swales occupy 0.69 acres of the site. Approximately 6.05 acres is a disturbed wetland community (FLUCFCS Code 643E2 and 643E3). 4. Other: See attached Florida Master Site File letter and map indicating no structures, cemeteries or sites on file for the Section/Township/Range of the subject site. B. The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by an accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the cost of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist. The decision of the County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal to the Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation Board regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County Commissioners. Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 Packet Pg. 696 SECTION FOUR: CERTIFICATION A. The applicant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this application. Any time delays or additional expenses necessitated due to the submittal of inaccurate or incomplete information shall be the responsibility of the applicant. B. All information submitted with the application becomes a part of the public record and shall be a permanent part of the file. C. All attachments and exhibits submitted shall be of a size that will fit or conveniently fold to fit into a legal size (8 %2" x 14") folder. o4�� 9TH Signature of Applicant or Agent Laura DeJohn, AICP Printed Name of Applicant or Agent -TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION - SECTION FIVE: NOTICE OF DECISION The County Manager or designee has made the following determination: ❑ Approved on: IM ❑ Approved with Conditions on: By: (see attached) ❑■ Denied on: _ (see attached) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 5 Packet Pg. 697 9.A.7 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20170001733 I, Nicholas Kouloheras (print name), as Executive Vice President (title, if applicable) of Habitat for Humanity ofCollier county, Inc. (company, If a plicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicantQcontract purchaserMand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/[ authorize Johnson Engineering, Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Nichol o eras, Signature Executive VP for Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Date The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on 9 I I l -1 (date) by Nicholas Kouloheras (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as Executive VP of Habitat for Humanity of Collier County,lnc. who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. STAMPiSEAL Fe— I y� AMANDA MAE MARTIN :Notary Public - SIM/ of Florida My Comm. Eapiras Jun 1�. 2016.•` Commisaioq # FF 95921 REV 3/24/14 )&m a.v a&- N pi V� � Signature of Notary Public Packet Pg. 698 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20170001733 I, �� v (print name), as�.( (title, if T�L applicable) of GHU, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1, I have Rall authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Habitat for Humaniryof coiner county and Johnson Engineering. Inc. to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership; then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 8-915- dor? Date The foregoing instrfamen was sworn t (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on I (date) by K- (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to e_or-A+Ky-#&s-prod ced (type of identification) as identification. :s Signature of Notary Phlilic �i:°yti•.. REBECCAPARATORE t, MY COMMISSION 0 GG 097673 EXPIRES: July 4, 2021 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwrhera CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3/24/14 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 699 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20170001733 1, Joan DiCillo (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of cHu, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Habitat for Humanity of collier county and Johnson Engineering, Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. Pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's 'Managing Member." • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that 1 have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that t facts stated in it are rue. Signature Date i STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on N t_1 I l (date) by Joanocnlo (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as Manager of c.H.u., L.L.C. who is personally known to me-ar-who-ha oduced (type of identification) as identification.7:�� STAMPlSEAL Snature of Notary bhc REBECCA PARATORE MY COMMISSION # GG 097673 t + p EXPIRES: July 4, 2021 ''•.�;'�, t°`'BontiedThru Notary PuDllc tJnderwrllera CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3124114 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 70C AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20170001733 Nicholas Willo (print name), as Power of Attorney for Gloria OiGillo (the sole surviving directorl (title, If applicable) of Newell Creek, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/1 authorize Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. and Johnson Engineering, Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. Pres. • 1f the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER (( ($� The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on l ` (date) by Nicholasocillo (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as POA for Gloria 0011o, sole director of Newell creek, Lt C who is personally known to me or�cvholproddc`ec7 (type of identification) as identification. STA Signature of otary Public �y+^�'p'•• REBECCAPARATORE : MY COMMISSION # GG 097673 EXPIRES, July 4, 2021 l3ondod Thru Notary Publlc Underwriters CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3124114 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 701 AFFIDAVIT April 14, 2017 Newell Creek LLC, Ohio Gloria M. DiCillo 7975 Newell Creek Mentor, Ohio 44060 To whom it may concern, I give my permission to Nicholas K. and Joan D. DiCillo of GHU LLC, Ohio to speak on my behalf regarding the property that we co-own in Collier County Florida. Sincerely yours, Gloria M. DiCillo Newell Creek LLC, Ohio Dated this q4t`day o 6, 12017 M �6� Signat a of Affiant State o 0 County of�Gk_ Subscribed and sworn to, or affirmed, before me on this W+_ day of fl\ 201 y A cant Signature Notary Public e� ago My Commission Expires: 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 7W DUMAMA POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR SALE OFIREAL ESTATE ,� BY THIS DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY, I,,C maks, constitute, and appoint YJ4K a 1_ A5 e e.'//o �ho is my cv (relations, e4# S' J and who I will refer to as my "Attorney", as my true and la attorney to act for me and in my ,CG e.. name, place and stead .l intend this instrument to be exercisable until revoked. My Attorney's powers are limited to the following: REAL PROPERTY: The powers of the Attorney include, but are not limited to, at public or private sale, the right to buy, sell, convey, bargain, assign, grant, transfer, lease and grant options or amend or modify any leases or options, on any and all real property owned by me now or in the future, including my homestead. Also, my Attorney may exchange, borrow against or mortgage any real property owned by me. Also, my Attorney may obtain liability, property damage, theft, flood, and any other type insurance. It is unnecessary to identify each piece of real property as my holdings might change over time. Or REAL PROPERTY: The powers of the Attorney include the right to contract for the sale and execute all documents necessary to sell or transfer the following described property. Street Address of Property; Am -44 -J4-' 6 ('11 7V�O= Legal Description of Property, if known: rd)• .0S3 7—,� gS — S.Ee-T i-Cw f f %//-,/ INDEMNIFY THIRD PARTIES: I hereby indemnify and hold harmless any and all third parties who rely on this Durable Power of Attorney and who have no knowledge of its revocation or its having been amended. This is intended as a "Durable Power of Attorney" within the meaning of Section 709.08, Florida Statutes, This Durable Power of Attorney shall not be affected by my disability, incapacity, or incompetence, except as provided by statute. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this power of attorney on Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of Signed '797f Address: L'lwgw4 - "0i C,l to STATE OF N /ID CO' r OF �. 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 70" I HERESY CERTIFY that on this day before me,, an officer duty qualified to acknowledgments, personally appeared l01) a- 13.1 . // Personally known to me or who has presented a driver's license as identification, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing and acknowledged before me that he/she executed the same. =AP14SS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid on Notary Public Signature MY COMMISSION EXP aaaN� q .' ROBIN COLADAN©ELO No�t�t Pubs ftft Of ow NVCamn. Lvku Fes. 21.2W 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 704 9.A.7 REGAL ACRES II RPUD EXHIBIT D Legal Description for Additional 23.15 Acres DESCRIPTION PARCEL No. 00737760008 & 00741080606 (ORB 3935, PG 3581) THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES, AND THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL No. 00738280008 (ORB 4467, PG 1397) NORTH 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TRACT 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 E. PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY TAX DEED OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 875, PAGE 445, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL No. 00737720006 (ORB 5083, PG 657) THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONTAINING TEN (10) ACRES, MORE OR LESS, EXCEPTING THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF, WHICH IS RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL No. 00741100104 (ORB 270, PG 867) (PER TITLE COMMITMENT) THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 (NW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 (NE 1/4) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTION THAT PORTION LYING IN THE WEST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4. ALSO BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE EAST 1,018.64 FEET OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Regal Acres II RPUD - Legal Description August 2017 Page 3of3 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 705 on°3 Boon "LE'LAjD .1A N -2 AIE 0 50 100 200 (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1"=100') rrm. n.v NOTES: 1, DATA .1 NELD Al D. .11, 2 —NONATES NO H- DATA N"`QN `NEAT AND A P,OXC7EO ONA IINE EOO1EI.ATE E - l9 E. .1R1 ADICAN DAII 1 1111SDI — AD117, -RI.. EN ON ARE ..D ON — WRTI LINE OF 1�, IRAN. Ol E- -ENEN l.D ..TN LINE FpLA1N111'N.C1E 611`�OED ZZEAIA'IDE1, 7)—S ASH�V` X X DO PANEL NI.— 12121C -D T. E -CT. DATE unr 1s. 6 R "AN -S NOT LO' A� 11- 611ON91AIIO"EI.ROACNIENTO, NET LICATED A TART .1 ms ll 7, TNID SUN— 15 -NT TO ANY "' T"Ay 8E E- "LL AND 'DE"ATE _ 'A'EN A D;1 _11NEIT MI AXTON`AJyOA TIE was NOT PROW TO DIE R DEUNRI RNSIA&I N��*KE,AY"RETPNEOENTON Al ZON'.D OR N, NO —E—ENTAL ASlrl`RyR A,�ITpAS,N,ORMEDNNDIE HERE" AND "' NOT "I" "y REPRE"'T"IN AS "'NEADON 0' All 1R.OICIONI 11I EXEEPT A� � 111OD TI. -1Y DOI NET P'RP'RT TI 11111ATE IE R1111-1 IR-11ON OT ANY 1EDERAL, lTA7E 01 IDEAL AGENCY 10 M 11NIVY LOMSINIOT OE�M.'I�ERPRIOPEAR��IROI"�S�IPIORA.PRONP�� ZVI I THE 11U � N ANNE IE -AL 11, ADE—S OR TELETON8 70 DT$ IUR 4AP O� EE T 8Y ODHEP THAN TIE _'I 'ATTY _U n E _N M SENT � TNE _2 p 12.0`TSTE E—ME— OENETTNG TIE 1ECT NN- ARE .0. ONLY ..E TIEY ONN_ To THE SA,,C7 _T, 11-1D 11RIEL 1-11 -ARE OR A— IORE 14 AERIA_ PHOTTR,�HY"SHX7��El�TAI�0181TRPNOSE�S�ONL�' .'.' AND DA'D "17 N, ON 9.A.7 z lVE NEAI Nov u A, LL L 5D T NAA- "n.E.T=U.= I -Tl RATAL ....... 40' DRAI.A. EHA.NEL 100 12 Q.) DO( PnRa 080808 0 IE AE11 1/2 1 11 EA11 1n 0' 11 EA11 1/2 a 11 3.aiTM oP ,IE MORE EA_ 1 OT _,TN " /�DNE TIE NDETI 1EE1 — IS RE� D POIR/P PEOT CH N89-7 -E 339,83(C) 1)'AN "S.D 'AN, " 1/i .1 — EAlT 1/` DI .1IT. 12, -P 51 S- NANDE lO EA5T6FE -NG — N- lD _ P_ p,._, OF DNE I—E EE—.O 0' —. E..1 —IN., TIE NE- 339.££ '10) -M F—Al D—EIDED P „o E—CEL No, 00738280008 _l. P, "l) " " 'E "' '/' " " N' cc TNE "1 1 /. .1 E Ol C, - ER 1AN.E Ol E AP -RED BY TAX DEED 01-A ECONDS DOON ODNT, PA, CN, �,� DT TDOETHEN THE —..0D, T- I.,. 1A111 (DR. IE KIT 1/1 oT IE 11T 1/1 1 TIE NEDIAEOT 1/1 01 11 1 i—11T 1, l..,"EANDE IT 1/1 1 "N ow AMll TNE ORTN lD FEET —NE. .N`�'DAD` .Z P.El M . PAA11L .iol 1.111,10, CO. 2 . .. ... ) (IEI TIE —..EYI TNE .R1 0. IEET 01 — N-T 1/1 (.w 1/°) 0' TNE ._ '44 RANGE 26 EA ' .T -1. -1 1. THE —T ,/z 1 1/1 �121 11RINE1 1/1 01 TTE NEA1T 1/1. ALl. INl E.N.. AO -- IE "T 1`11�OMT N." '�" I FEET 1 '12'. N_ 1/ —A T �/. � CTON 11 S.— OD EAOI EELL. E.N1 —RIEA ti NOTES: 1, DATA .1 NELD Al D. .11, 2 —NONATES NO H- DATA N"`QN `NEAT AND A P,OXC7EO ONA IINE EOO1EI.ATE E - l9 E. .1R1 ADICAN DAII 1 1111SDI — AD117, -RI.. EN ON ARE ..D ON — WRTI LINE OF 1�, IRAN. Ol E- -ENEN l.D ..TN LINE FpLA1N111'N.C1E 611`�OED ZZEAIA'IDE1, 7)—S ASH�V` X X DO PANEL NI.— 12121C -D T. E -CT. DATE unr 1s. 6 R "AN -S NOT LO' A� 11- 611ON91AIIO"EI.ROACNIENTO, NET LICATED A TART .1 ms ll 7, TNID SUN— 15 -NT TO ANY "' T"Ay 8E E- "LL AND 'DE"ATE _ 'A'EN A D;1 _11NEIT MI AXTON`AJyOA TIE was NOT PROW TO DIE R DEUNRI RNSIA&I N��*KE,AY"RETPNEOENTON Al ZON'.D OR N, NO —E—ENTAL ASlrl`RyR A,�ITpAS,N,ORMEDNNDIE HERE" AND "' NOT "I" "y REPRE"'T"IN AS "'NEADON 0' All 1R.OICIONI 11I EXEEPT A� � 111OD TI. -1Y DOI NET P'RP'RT TI 11111ATE IE R1111-1 IR-11ON OT ANY 1EDERAL, lTA7E 01 IDEAL AGENCY 10 M 11NIVY LOMSINIOT OE�M.'I�ERPRIOPEAR��IROI"�S�IPIORA.PRONP�� ZVI I THE 11U � N ANNE IE -AL 11, ADE—S OR TELETON8 70 DT$ IUR 4AP O� EE T 8Y ODHEP THAN TIE _'I 'ATTY _U n E _N M SENT � TNE _2 p 12.0`TSTE E—ME— OENETTNG TIE 1ECT NN- ARE .0. ONLY ..E TIEY ONN_ To THE SA,,C7 _T, 11-1D 11RIEL 1-11 -ARE OR A— IORE 14 AERIA_ PHOTTR,�HY"SHX7��El�TAI�0181TRPNOSE�S�ONL�' .'.' AND DA'D "17 N, ON 9.A.7 z lVE NEAI Nov u A, LL L 5D T NAA- "n.E.T=U.= I -Tl RATAL ....... 40' DRAI.A. EHA.NEL 100 12 Q.) w" < L 0 cc FIT 11,0K o M . ti C) CD z < CD LL 0 Z _j dw D < 0. U) z - 0. I W _LL cc A ED Z�111.. ED, FINE NO 0.. PE— aR EN— Nnr .1 ON DIO .—I E I HE Y E'RIFY 1' TIE "'T " A NO — AND m APPLE— S'O E PROI NO DI CHAP;OEEN� 0 ILMIDA ADIIIM 'WE . .... . T T&`471. HDA BOUNC M SURV 411111 NA -1 I H "AND R. .2) l F—DA 1FIE ..EET L DATE ..ED: 10 NOT -0 "THOUT TNE SQNR�ZU A— OEAL OF A _DA L,,,D U, NO M IN EERTIT—ON S 70 DATE � _AST nE.D -N Al ORWPNEAl NASED 9.A.7 isThis record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333 for project review information. January 11, 2018 Florida Master Laura DeJohn Site Johnson Engineering, Inc. File 2122 Johnson St Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone: 239.334.0046 Email: LKS@johnsoneng.com In response to your inquiry of January 10, 2018 the Florida Master Site File lists no archaeological sites, two linear resources, and no standing structures found in the following section of Collier County: T 51S R 26E S 12 as shown on corresponding map. When interpreting the results of our search, please consider the following information: • This search area may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, historical structures or other resources even if previously surveyed for cultural resources. • Because vandalism and looting are common at Florida sites, we ask that you limit the distribution of location information on archaeological sites. • While many of our records document historically significant resources, the documentation of a resource at the Florida Master Site File does not necessarily mean the resource is historically significant. • Federal, state and local laws require formal environmental review for most projects. This search DOES NOT constitute such a review. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the results of this search. Sincerely, Cody VanderPloeg Archaeological Data Analyst Florida Master Site File Cody.VanderPloeg@dos.myflorida.com 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 www.flheritage.com/preservation/sitefile 850.245.6440 ph 1 850.245.6439 fax SiteFile@dos.state.fl.us Packet Pg. 707 r ' OM Ct Uj 3 i`arC i t!■ JIM051.1 l •■ ■ r ! _L` t, i M !� Il# �■ Majestic Cir r k iy�Yi.^5i lame Key�Ln l +�. spil1f"1< Milia*. ■A r.t � .: E �Supariam �n y W. sAi CY o f room, i } - �• Grams' Key Ln •'•._. Q.' Pine Kat' Lr+^'*Tf`T { . 4�G� .�• • 1 lily 11. fI ��l�■■ a�amorada'Ln AAelody�Ln. . .o Sandfield Ln • lndiari'Key+Ln� 1Cecll Fid —y ;Irv, 1'. Mesq; Fa ad se�U?t Apelachee SS ,o - p nw, II F@, - LA-'J.�.L�7C'.P�.:1p �LM1Vp .0. p. Historical_ - p C�..,,�� d �y�r Ip Cry CBi Q�G . o 1 Cemeteries . 0 ��u,��. p 0 0 0- �PJISI- @p 0 �II,u�Au�l O p 0 Historical Bridges M"j i�0y/pp _ p O - 0 -p IANNOIIUJ�p O Resource Groups oV� a�N�o o �Qo�p Do�i o 0 o C�sjQQo -sou y uuuxp�Go11'DpMufn�vppo Pi 0, Florida Master Site File Florida AR=6 Master SS=O scM=O Site RG=2 File otal=2 Tota SitelD Type CR00927 RG US-41 CR00928 RG Tamiami Canal Created: 9•A.7 Cultural Resource Roster Site Name Address Additional Info SHPO Eval NR Status Linear Resource - 1 Contrib Resources Eligible Linear Resource - 1 Contrib Resources Eligible El (D w M M r O O O r O N J a N D a co m V. M L i a+ C d E L V Q Page 1 of 1 Packet Pg. 709 I 9.A.7 I UTILITY STATEMENT Q Packet Pg. 710 9.A.7 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. Address: 11145 Tamiami Trail East City: Naples State: FL Telephone: (239) 775-0036 Cell: E -Mail Address: nkouloheras@habitatcollier.org Address of Subject Property (If available): City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34114 ROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 1/ 5/ 26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: ZIP: 34113 Fax: (239) 775-0477 Only a portion of the property is platted. Metes & Bounds Description: See Exhibit D. 00737720006,00741100104, Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00737760008, 00741080606, 00738280008 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System a. County Utility System b. City Utility System ✓❑ C. Franchised Utility System b. City Utility System d. Private System (Well) ❑ C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Package Treatment Plant H (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System ❑ I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑✓ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be Served: 116 dwelling units Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 118 GPM Average Daily: 41'412 GPD B. Sewer -Peak: 78 GPM Average Daily: 27,608 GPD If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: August 2019 2/21/2017 Page 8 of 16 Packet Pg. 711 9.A.7 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. N/A Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Acknowledged. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 2/21/2017 Page 9 of 16 Packet Pg. 712 DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS r a Packet Pg. 713 9.A.7 REGAL ACRES II RPUD DEVIATIONS & JUSTIFICATIONS Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.0l.N, "Street System Requirements," which calls for minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet. This request is to allow for a 55 -foot right-of-way minimum width for a limited section of the private street network, extending for a length of approximately 350 feet and terminating in a hammerhead or Y configuration. Minimum right-of-way width of SS feet is requested to address a limited section of the private street network in the northern vicinity of the site. This segment of the private street network is approximately 350 feet in length and will serve approximately 20 homesites at the most. It is appropriate for this intimately scaled street to have 10 foot wide lanes corresponding to a more context sensitive human scale. This reduces impervious area and reduces land dedicated to roadway by ten feet, which in turn allows for more open space throughout the site that provides more community benefit. A 55 foot right-of-way is adequate to achieve safe and efficient vehicular, emergency vehicle, and pedestrian movement while satisfying utility and drainage needs in this location. Aside from this segment of the private street network, the other roads within the RPUD will be consistent with a minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, "On -Premises Directional Signs," which requires on -premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10 feet from edge of roadway, paved surface or back of curb. This deviation requests a minimum setback of 5 feet from the edge of private roadway/drive aisle. This deviation will allow locational flexibility for directional signage internal to the RPUD. This also allows for helpful directional signage to be located between the edge of the roadway and the sidewalk. A unified design theme will apply to all signage throughout the community, thereby ensuring a cohesive appearance and attractiveness. All directional signage will meet the Clear Sight Distance requirements in accordance with LDC Section 6.06.05. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a, "Trees and Palms", which states that no more than 30% of required canopy trees may be substituted by palms. This deviation requests to increase the allowable substitution of palms to up to 60% of required canopy trees used to satisfy individual residential lot requirements (of LDC section 4.06.05.A.1). The intent is to relocate the required residential lot -tree plantings to the right-of-way and common areas where they can be maintained by the HOA and provide enhanced aesthetics around the walkways and on -street parking. Street trees may be planted in close proximity to underground utilities and sidewalks. Allowing up to 60% of the plantings in this area to be palms will reduce the degree of tree health issues in the future, minimize the impact of street trees on the utilities, and reduce the likelihood of roots heaving sidewalks or on street parking. The quality appearance of a well landscaped community and treelined streets is still accomplished and is more sustainable with the proposed palms substituting for up to 60% of canopy trees. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, "Fences and Walls" which calls for a maximum fence or wall height of 4 feet and 6 feet in residential components of PUDs. This deviation requests allowance for a maximum wall height of 8 feet measured from nearest finished floor elevation for buffering along the external PUD boundaries and protection from the drainage ditch to the south. The proposed deviation will provide the adjacent West Wind mobile home park and future neighbors additional visual screening and provide a protective barrier between the proposed Regal Acres II RPUD - Deviations Justifications ME `N August 2018 Page lof2 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 714 REGAL ACRES II RPUD DEVIATIONS & JUSTIFICATIONS recreational area and the existing drainage ditch to the south. This enhances aesthetics and protects the children who will be likely to play in the recreation area. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.0l.J, "Dead End Streets", which calls for dead ends streets to terminate in a cul-de-sac. This deviation requests the ability to end one of the street segments within the PUD with a hammerhead or Y configuration as approved by the local Fire District. This deviation request applies to the limited section of the private street network in the northern vicinity of the site. This segment of the private street network is approximately 350 feet in length and will serve approximately 20 homesites at the most. A full-sized cul-de-sac on a short street of approximately 350 feet is a very inefficient use of space. The alternative fire department turnaround options of a hammerhead or "Y" can more effectively serve the circulation needs of this specific location, resulting in enhancement to the overall development by providing added amenities, landscaping, and open space while still providing adequate room for fire trucks to maneuver safely in the proposed location. Regal Acres II RPUD - Deviations Justifications MM `N August 2018 Page 2of2 ENGINEERING Packet Pg. 715 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA • I WATER MAIN 5' 9' 5' S/W PARKING 55' RIGHT-OF-WAY 20' ROAD 9 55' ROW CROSS SECTION ENGINEERING N.T.S. JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PHONE: (239) 434-0333 FAX: (239) 334-3661 E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 O Of 5' S/W REGAL ACRES II - RPUD DEVIATION 1 9.A.7 SEPT. 2017 I 20170078 112-51-26 I AS SHOWN I 1 I Packet Pg. 716 FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA T - TI IRN ENGINEERING 9.A.7 JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. 2350 STANFORD COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PHONE: (239) 434-0333 FAX: (239) 334-3661 E.B. #642 & L.B. #642 V - TI IPNI REGAL ACRES II - RPUD DEVIATION 5 SEPT. 2017 I 20170078 112-51-26 I AS SHOWN I I Packet Pg. 717 BOUNDARY SURVEY Q Packet Pg. 718 Boundary Survey Existing Regal I Plat 9.A.7 Q Packet Pg. 719 p4pA.'. ENGINEERING 9360 "ANFORO COVRTM. LOCATION MAP HOT R) :GALE - I�FrPrSi!IE�.i3l► �^aa S*RIE W RO NBA CWNFV a COEuER L XNEHY •[� NFn Rr THEW PNE5UNIK MAY MOICAt FOR Alu"IPY OF CC M EGuR'f . OxnEN W MF UFA05 CFSCRinEp IIEREON, HAS CAIKED TO PRAT CNAMa 'RCOAL AIRES' n Q 7"1'0 00 MAEDm _ A N FOCAFE TO NED& ACRES HOOEIRNERS' A550DAPON. WO: I. ALL t ACE CAMPAMT6 M.E i TON 1701HAMIIM wWAtEFmFi PVA{S PIM I UTI Fpr F 2. ALL U20SCAPE FN.CFER EAgUNEF5 "K.j MTH 6EyfCE151pF1tt FOR vAW1ENWC W[E UANTCRIAM EASCI (LUE.) wM R 05e6EFY fpl UANSENANC 4 ALLu'ITFmN q: EA5EUUEFy (UE) fOi ACCESS "D NAYHIFR.WICE Pwbms w M RSOrHry TOR UAWI MM. S NL ,ECCESS EASENEfe15 (n E) FOR AA;CEss NUNNOE{5 wM -X-- ESNW�OryEry EOR A n CC A. A E SEAGI fs i E FCx IRmCAROH PUNA06E9 M PESPONfLIE1r [ I I :nAMCF r SHEET 1NDE& H01 10 SCAT lI willilill ial THIS PIAT, AS RECDRRRB IN FFS GRAPHIC FORM. IS TJIF OFFICIAL DEPICTION OP TIIN 'WI)MVIDBD SANDS DESCRIBED HEREIN AND WILL UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES B8 SUPPIARTED IN AUTIIORLTY BY ANY &THEN GRAPHIC OR DIGITAL PORES OP THE PLAT. TIME MAY B8 ADGIT[ONAL AMN CTI0N8 TRAIT AILS NO7 R&CORDEO ON THIS PLAT THAT 5IAY 98 POUND IN THE PVBL[C RrH;om OP THIS MIUATY. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I HERUFT CWIu' PlAr M FLAF 'Pu PREPARE. — A RWlputt SVNVEr W ME PSLCaM MYVfF4 O+ UC, CN WHOM MY GUPERxS AS NOAOCp IN '"""'R1 R 1Av.0A1, 70SFAFUA.S AND "F THIS RAT COMPISES WIN ALL CF INE WOO RUCIfIs C CHASIEN 1Tn, PART L A$ AUEHOEO. RCN10A 5TAN RS T 13 NRMEI CER NF'EO DIAT ALL YMWNEnE PEEER C WONUWENM n 0E SET - _ OR TO TRE RECCRWIC OF Pas PLAT AFRO PiAF AC PFFUNrtHT CWTf10L _ FCpNREO C...C� FICSR wLL 6E SEF P TO PHAAECEPTANCC OF ME Y til ow nils...LTA }`. D.Y of af.y)A-"AIL.. RAPN E. IIFCR P14YNY LD ill] 111.E nwo. KICN 1.N SVNTEmR ARO uAPPEN '1 y, a 1EY'- 7 • ROROA EELCATE NO SMS ACINHSCNH FO D EDWIN! IN wL •. �A'1'w Ij'>•i?:? 2350 S, FLI CW RT RARER FLCRQA 3111! SURNT:ri0i1YAL PROJECT WCATION REGAL ACRES A SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SB.PTESISER 2009 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PMIEE CI = Lu:n ill WT OP H2. TOlMAHV SR SWM, RAFFM M CMT, C0.1u1 Mil". FLORIDA Alp HIRE WANE a.WACVLAaLv DESCMNED AS F,DlOHNS. COLFAINCE AT Prt ICRP VAsr CIPHER CF %DnC 12. 10HHYUP 8 5 Tlk RANGE M EAst. Cd Prg COun Fr, FLONWA AIO Pon 5013TH "'W NEST ALOIFu .9 FAST WINE CF Sub %CRM I2, n dSTAHLE M 319.53 FEET 10 IHC FKNFHEASF OENHEN OF THE SW TH R/2 M ME SOUTH 1/2 W ME W. i/a W V E MOO EA511/A OF DC HCNTFASf V. M SAM SECT OH Tl; HENCE SENTn aM� 6' MSH AWHG RC NdtIH ONE W SAFI Spurt 1/R P rIIF�� 5OUTH V. a THE PIMP, 1/2 CY FHL nfRIHEASi F/a CF THF NCAVMfkST I/4, A OKSANCE OF ,1000 NCEF TO TC PCINr a NE HNHIN , HEMI SpfTH p0�2a-2Y' •CSF FAAAuli MM AND At A FVPE �[W.CR p5mK cF 1000 fFif '110111 5Ap FAST VHE CE SECnpF 12. A MSTAtt(Y Da p65.6a 1 i EE 10 AN WTEaSECnpI MTN n( SWTTH ONE OF ME SOUTH [/Z CF ME NMWAST F/4 W THE HNNOPEAS[ I/4 LF sST SEcnON 12; THCHCE NC Tlk 4"I'M' HEST ALONd 5AO SCUFH UHF, A C 5TANCE O 413.00 FEEF TO SPIE HCRPiCASi :CPMn CF THAF vwEFL CF LANG 065CR.gEO 5 PAM F w [K wA1NANTV OEEO REEOROEO w WCUL RECVNDS J10CH 551; PAOC TFO6 OF THE FVBI+C NFCDMS LK LCwFp cpyn R, FTp9pA. THENCE MTH 00]6'2]" NEST ALOHO ME Ens[ LRIE W SATO PAICC_ A 05TMU pE NE0.9T EEEF F0 HC YWACASP COitIEN a Sup PARCEL; A E 'WNMI 60'SYM- NIST AELNG VY SOu NF unC tr SAO PARCEL ANO C SOUM AHE v MUT NANE0. OP IANp OCSCAMAO AT E ASML 2 nH SID OFR NECONOEO N CFFTOAL NECCR04 aOW 1012- PAGE 11]0. A GSiAN[E [E 9[0.E0 HEFT TO THE RICCL 2 EST CCNNER Cf 9AA PANEL 2 AN WFFpSCCPOH N1DI THE HEST ulE OF CPC SWMEASF R/a CE ME NORMEAST R/4 M U0 =Ptrt IT- IHCNCE NCRTH C^-$J'W CA51 ALEEW SAW NEST I AN INC •E55 uufS LF 1HE SOON 1/v CE FHE NQRMEASF 1/4 W PE NONMFAAI I/4 AND PE SOUTH 1/2 CP EPE SOuM H/2 W ME N NTA 1/2 Do ME N,lMCAST R/E GE INE NOR U�CHSf 1/4 u 5u. SECnCA F9. A pST.WCE OE 1,15524 PCEF TO SPIE NOPm. EOAa CF SAO SCUnH I/A pF ME SOUTH 1/2 OE AC MCRM 1/2 CP Nil NOR PEAST 1/4 Oi THE NORTN[ASF 1/4 W SAW SEtiDYl-I2; IHENCC nORTi evx'F6' EAST ALpp FIIE HARM L>`rt O SAO SOIFPi 1/2 d INC scu FH tIi OP THE F4 TH 1/A Ci THE NORniEAST R/4 a 1HE HORTHEASi 1/% A &WT C W F]F9 Y5 FECT TO PE 5.510 PORT U BEOnnHFO Qultm� 1AO1.425 SOUARE FEEF OR 1616 ACAES W LAO, WINE CR LESS APPROVALS ENCiNF,F,RING AND)ENVIRONMENTALSCRVICBSG 1eygr71 1 A VTO ar:THii MWNEENVH 'AND GIAGNUEPI FAL 5 VCEs •MSI Na. v MHE .�nLEly-L64 /NENi.Ip��fxF°L4:! cWRrr, rLa+RA. THis ci-- onr w' 5 2C0`A: A11' S.A. CHN2A.ON5HI(pE ENUNEERAp arm NCEx .. COUNTY ATTORNk Y - PIS PIAr OPRONED MY PTE ,A3 QJCA CION Ff A.QINKI Mg A^ DAY d OjAka_ 2C Np, A� STENNi..NILU S 9YST,Wi WNTYf AF [OHNE} SURVEYOR: ,6 1M1 eEUH NEHEW.tl nl n'E m""P M"Y" SVRyEYOR, Mls lYm Ar wAJ_ 1 `v. 5OH HiOFVRLI =ARM t0N1' WAW_ CUUN[Y COMM9W0K AAPRGVALt 1fAI9 ET' FLONTOA COun Hv 1l CORUER 55 isP3 PIAF APPRONEO fM PECONnnG u A NECL4M PryL'BI AEE nHG,RVR IV C t�OA_pp a =WTV PNOS1 MAF E RAUxMiS OYmIME O'�iFICESOP U �LrAN ll�i I( [IR�W 1C 1W9.� N Cp AFY. I A Zil L�'.P 115{`IV AL --. ,.a� ADNpIf E �. QERH -A H WAPO W COMFY CWHISSIONERS M,EH EWNTY, RPIWA CLERK'S CERTIFICATION: H PIERCE' CERNNEf "SJS E{PLAT 1_E-5 RUN 0"IINED 0011' WEE1�AtN1 AHAF NDV EIFt]WFMVIJPUES W 'CA. AND CUL'pNCL(q bw PLAT ROUIr' Ap'F vAWE.Epg �}.-�apxUyTY, AI 6 fHE PUAiIlL AC " v Ot v MUM COUNTY, R DA BY k1Wia3Ai3 11PAND w COUNTY CPIUISryI IFRS SEAE SIENA a '.I. •i PLAT 9.A.7 PAGE _ SHEE' OF 4 DEDICAMON S*RIE W RO NBA CWNFV a COEuER L XNEHY •[� NFn Rr THEW PNE5UNIK MAY MOICAt FOR Alu"IPY OF CC M EGuR'f . OxnEN W MF UFA05 CFSCRinEp IIEREON, HAS CAIKED TO PRAT CNAMa 'RCOAL AIRES' n Q 7"1'0 00 MAEDm _ A N FOCAFE TO NED& ACRES HOOEIRNERS' A550DAPON. WO: I. ALL t ACE CAMPAMT6 M.E i TON 1701HAMIIM wWAtEFmFi PVA{S PIM I UTI Fpr F 2. ALL U20SCAPE FN.CFER EAgUNEF5 "K.j MTH 6EyfCE151pF1tt FOR vAW1ENWC W[E UANTCRIAM EASCI (LUE.) wM R 05e6EFY fpl UANSENANC 4 ALLu'ITFmN q: EA5EUUEFy (UE) fOi ACCESS "D NAYHIFR.WICE Pwbms w M RSOrHry TOR UAWI MM. S NL ,ECCESS EASENEfe15 (n E) FOR AA;CEss NUNNOE{5 wM -X-- ESNW�OryEry EOR A n CC A. A E SEAGI fs i E FCx IRmCAROH PUNA06E9 M PESPONfLIE1r [ I I :nAMCF r - IS C_'Ln -"IS . W FS C -F, C-2. ' AND CA NA [CYURT MEAS F02 THE USER s OF ONE F WHIANS C. 51GNAGE, xA1M. u1NACSFW ANI THE u5F ANp EHJ011E N C O , ENTSCN FAW9EN5 ar HIE A55pO.TnpI, SVOACF TW THE EASEMENTS MENE91 MiN NE9u CD Epi RNnTfNAKE 6 FNAETS L -I AND L••2 AS UHES FOR 9TONU PUPPOYt, Sues FFOR ^ [ RUP MARENP MSBIENFS'ERC HM H VAICN, D PESPW-NAPA FOR u BLElt 10 9ENACT •0M AS A PNIMI ROAD RNiIT-CP-NAY IB/wl SWFLEOf f0 ME FASEWE r IED FHERLdH NTH REfPOvs�RUTT FOA uART1ENA.EE O cETRCAIE TO FULKN M.- J T W WANAA EXPEWENTS tOEI ANHWT NCSPCNLDuN PW M-IWAHCF I� 2 AL IARC uUNFENAFCC EAS VIFS (Lu.E1 MTI t NE—mu"" FCR u EII Fi J. ALL WHATINANCE CASEFEENTS INC.) FCR ACCESS W UAWTENANCE PWPP05E4 A NCSPOr1510.UTV FW HMUNTFNAHET. F N C KWA1E MMC CY-IY0 MAT, WAFER AIw SENA MMIOT. 1 UL Mn Tr .1OlI EAstAI is (O.uE.) F�oN IT¢ aVRPOSES OF VRSFV MTA L -P rxuCHUH, i. [DEAR—. CP U H`IENANCE L"G THE OF AOC[SS 10 PWORY ATHY w PCmw, MMWF RE`iG IJTr Fpt MNNHNAFCE S. ALL wTFA,N YMTEN AAAI SE ERN VAERJTV:S GGNSTN.cxR MAH TFRS PEA fTEp ANF IDL MCEPTmCE OF TION( m 01 UFYm rwunES PVRR/AFT TO APPINs1BLE COUP "i -DOING M05C SIC FpIN THE CONE CF OM AID OND.,, NCEA CHWIM r: . . MORS. 0 DEDCATE TO IU UICEN500 0 MMOI5i0 PuWC OR FRIVAIE Vnjms- It A FUN-EICLVb1E MOOS UTFI IV CAVM4F [P.UE1 AS eJRE'Ml CN M FEAF Fryt P O MPUNHOYS. RKt1ArNc EONSFNUCTWR E+STALIATKN, ANN R.AHCE. ANO CPMnOOfE 0 NE�EO mm, FAnu SES, WELWMG CA'E Mal"" VRNCC4, PROMOEO MAP S N IF0. AN EHT -M. ME OSE MY THE C0ER " Iu1tA-StxER 0 TO NOT i.CENS I1uCC ENENT A CA, "IIIS THt FM US M NOMEN MUCIC my Ff. IT tY FHE ai Ell RESPONS'BLE FOP SAO OAUACES. C. OEEICAIE TO CCILEn MFITY.. 16 FRANCHISEES AFA THC C '. Cq.F' _A AE 'L A NpH-FKLV FOWR PSE PURPOSE CF PENWiuf r � sitv,E SFTLgEY A13 FApCMEPEIAASFEIEUOMATPE[AnE.] TEU.ME. rt+ N Mw wE55 KW., HA1(fAT FW IWLFANI v Of- Cg R MINTY. INC, PAS CNI-D n �F .15 TO 0E SAGIED T H5 __5M15C NAY DF _,'jLeAAl.n}AL!_. __� so09, AV Y wFHEsxs ` �fl SA GiTF Pk,UUMI gIWT NAUC f fT4nFe5 .4Sry1L, HAD FAT EW uUUAN�iv Lv W punl7, Inc N f=.ltlsC.NRILs�f 1 ARwt HuuE �I.�A.E�r. l a i E t v ACKNOWLEDGMENT Q E v FLW N. 6r __i lSisr ME FOKpQFNO OUNCATON NAS ACNHO'AACOCEO MINE UE IRIS JSA11'_ O.aY v Br SAM DII1% AS PR(SOCHI OP RABPAF FOR MIJANITY OF MOEO Cp.Wn I]e 20(19. RW PERSCEfALLr -NOW FG WE, OR HAS PROOUCEO 5 N KII. eO�T.��E,6�i; Si f FSARyn (SEAL) Packet Pg. 720 ENtiINEER1NC ' :IAPlEN. AYlONl0.TA91Ir 9.A.7 nE -mo 111E P 3n; 5W.11 1/2 w nlr 5a. 'IA:6 1� la%1R I'll /x u PLAT BOOK •�` .`•L PAG) nE NWMA5! 1/4 d IK AOAO Sr 1/L" SEC 1! -ll -}I tru3l"R • pill" (1l" �r eWM4dr% 1M2r ]]EMB NT �.5'-5" n.v09-qnR euTr aa .�_ OF 4SIM - - _ = F rIt 6Jh REGAL ACRES 5 4 1$iI 1 , PQ(N o" A SUBDIN' ISION IN SECTION I 1 PK�Iq N1"NL' `� _ n rt L. R[ TOWNSHIP 51 SOU -1 H, RANGE 2 QST 1.1, `" 1a •' SeP6MI6'R a' COLLIER COUNTY, I�LORIL _ .]i.90'� !9"!C �]9.'.AO' !D'I•• Y•••_.. .. _it; KINGDOM COIJqI' � VkkIR Pc, AE, ie. r-uE..xn SLIP.. � C IiYR ,YAHiid _ .. 11 Ireoya'a<r 16-00• fi, rE6,01]6'IIO' PE.j1 IACT 'ir y I �, Na9,]CFat f [cDl.loll AREA. LLr, Anaacl rs6st �r 1 k 31Ixa.aV I t L ',L1 1warE i `r4I 1.� .• w1s•ae �1� -r M as •^3 I� ti :e9ae-le-w 1 ! 1. ,e aF I 11E.W ., s`Yl.h: N69']]'3!'W p x! !sD 11I$j I im:v I:; rim CURY6I':N0TI1 NAOLUS CENTRAL MOI.e I CRON CIIYRP NaPBAfry C1 cA - 0.Wi� .... "��•L6v _IL V,. 11 A 5 al • cn] �iL 13AE'.. _ :SP:"-... A. � "w LEVRND N e . .�.. r 1� .�� fjl,YSRB•f �i v411i;, �: ,y I�:7 I Q, r]I . C"2k Ge-!L7.",I:__ :SYS_ A12 C" n" _ • _ 1• •low,• e]I • _}6 Wrx cr] mw lxvr C " A1U PEi I W n ! x6wrlr -. UWMr 2wS n}x w 1.V N lc 6L M M O 0 20' 90' fl0' O [err"' l� O 5Q1 E IN I ET O N J d 1 4a i� .. 0.Wi� .... "��•L6v _IL V,. 11 A 5 al • cn] �iL 13AE'.. _ :SP:"-... A. � "w LEVRND N TRACT N f,-ili�Se9•S.f sl1E , R �i v411i;, �: ,y I�:7 I Q, v.0. dmnAR- e0£R Q lL9E4• !�" 1ie6-0p w.l$ ^il � i �__- J 1!1 �vl .�1`. GYL � Vlllli'lf A1U PEi I W n ! "'1... 12.i i - Y. RRn.A11011 EASENIIi w 1.V "s]'sAT U .5`j:y I •. y 1. :J I.:{d �.I[ - 0.! • prnwA(s- Gauy.l' L.YL IAYE uuNIENANE£ £ASEI T YL YAWR]1ANCL FASEVEN[ • '1 - _ -!18d r:i �^ -: .-- - ! lily [ 4 1 65 n Y N69'sSla'E_I �I H "- a6.CI' .! 11 `'�• �I RG OCES4E XYE�TIElf! LRG LµIP Aov omFI L"Av Nt I� I •A3 °I �x aL. J• 1 I°: N [ Ilam' - R/W WIi1r-F-W ]YE 1 •- � i i ! 1"_ \: r 1 �i? Il (l1-•.: f .. ■ • a f 6- x jr *"I TE T1016NIENF ANo dl 1• RAE AHD CTP. m Le. lEAQ -5. Kix a • L _ 16t I �11II AS A PERM T MUUENX Y9nAYEn1 1� 116dY 11. I '1 x '- I P - RfSluu>FRr CnNTap. v01Nr (R F,) IkWND CCnq�E IE VCYBMNF (n N89!] -]T x 506 -DO' -1 5116 1' ' 1 16' .y. Lj [N X NnnlnA Id .Yi •� 1 I Npy 0 6 , - R - A> /1EUC n[rERENCE LpAfIEN[ (a ` v8 I _ _ [!..' ta.u' �rFt' 95. ➢esg •L _ 56D'33']rt Z i �� I i i IFFIMLFA C8 -Ll 0 6Eu+11C W 1 Ipp.W' 569'f6'T6'W I III E Irllcm L. Td Lo 1I Not 1 1 �` Iqr"�� -w ;I IO' FYI TRACT aA) i' �v6.xVw n i 1 ! PE I TSI r ! 11 1 1 1 NOTES Q (C* -O- + L 1 y- d o,E.T +^ ^� 1 n I I sw%.61r 1 s•- I" 1Y6.e6 LOdIDWn1t sx41 I. MARINO FARE 13AMa M n[ FLORWA SFe1E P E===.n. 3 M 66 ! 11]- J. - �r �i I I , [ II` , I I I ,JR f EASr ;TONE. THE CAST W Dr INE NDRiNFA^i r/A p. 5[CTlpl 1} Ic 569•?f']!-E I�' h 106 DO• 4 �,1 1 III I, 5555 1 1 I �� 1 Rf.F ENCN[E urs - D- e".I M26"b5• E.v:'. L NIE SVN LCf RMM :'NI FAT'S 1.801,4}9 9diNR /E[r OF.• .16-Y61 A[ QiIE C LES& (� wo, .. ` � _ I� "J §A r �' "_ -'a• i-' 1a.PY SIT 1 1 SRAV n 0-0% 5 LO Rii IN FEMA FL000 gp -N' AHD --I,- A Fww cewlwett PµNA DAA ELaco [LErA m TO ry Raz. � f. Cr ~ TRACT C_.I� I 11 Ixce,t66}oo nm A nc« iuA �ueaAn[nr'�"I?0uA0 Ac- `- I i R. E iCllelON AREA] I I1 ��__� _ I amNr tsFA=in[nad� CµPM IN mCL06m DELI -E Inc A nK IdmO !O IkCECO II[ x[WNplvlr . w I rywV wF KD C.! I 3 Now.___i-H 6. AIL v1AAIrI s[H [[5 vu nA�u Pw xF; a [0pxgwAT ai IL _ 48931'fE'[ 1 5(4 eon IZ-61-y6 R wKD VTI. I DiE � --Clf„ SlY7rldi 180.VJ na Nlnlxw!n PE4Tr.2D 1FLE0 fiOOH QE AOpA ^Wl & 10.}FEE3 •CECLMAFION 4]• m C9 b �- 61,6R' �" hi J 'r2r,CIRICLE 1 6. PRORERIv 5L0[Ci TU Ci WHNNii& CCHd S Arv0 ppEE aREE ocD[D w 0EF> nEcaos eoc«�Jil. R 0r15 U -• - eL', j. .• faK AuduC 1d:CCAUB d :d.u[N LWHIr, lLOwOA + 4•r TRACT ii -1 [R/YA P'. A.E. It.. R,LLL AHO C.U.YI - s µL OnEN5 Ws J1pxi, ARE w E.Er -Ii CEWIALS FNEREGF, 41,y 1A AN RAgAL MM NTLL A INgCAIO 9V 06 ' cm ,! se [ 1 7.' - 1.y cp 1}1 % 181 In 580 I Y �. Y f I $ g P i}S a 1Y9 In, 1R0 I. [. 5]} 1 1NF 5MnI IOIE DE I1E MPM 1/2 w S S ) ! ! mE-NdL1nER5T I/4 " INE 1 NOgmEA�SF 1/4 Y SECTION I}-31-19 ____ _ �•�� -b)-�- ,-„-,j L••-� -�.. _i__• _____ ____ __ _ "•.i_- Y • fb• - ,. _ ..f3 � _-- - � •- --'-_I_ 'y/ %44I TIIUf IS" S`Jp fLCdCOA C( A6 RREPARIIE RT! IoX VOYARI'ER n0. 69E9 10. 0'fY - rR ! 01cl5sr F IIt R EIC. Rio .r .S, FI rll-s, Packet Pg. 721 A 9.A.7 " r, f—i A T A d-4 11 L 0 �I — PLAT BOOK_ 49— PAG] 11 OF 4 F C L Packet Pg. 722 WT i N AK's iF [ 1]65 N ,HC. 7 9.A.7 YPI.AT BOOK -4a-_ FAG - • ENGIHEERLNG REGAL ACRES SITE. I OF 4 rn.rowP c [� :I'AVEl:4. YfAHlW ]!!Ik A SUBDIVISION IN SF:CI'ION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA EV ! WRTC1`111NR' - 3,CC 9HCPT.3 - ®- - TNAcr' 8-1 i6a'Srsdt eea.al - -- .... .. - j® - - muerwis- mn��• �'�� 0 ErevaPse�' _ _ ssa.••wt sao.e+' - c sessr.w•e fd ,00.ir s1.ss .r. r>,' .r_vs' -.,-a' it_oo" r..vo' -riar s.6= +ti_,: s_ar_ ____ __ _ _ _. _ _L J____ _ _ � � i 1 - - - - �- 1'---'"-----••� ' � ' � � •' �. f ,69 i '� tet IYY 1114 dj III 1 v.L.L +� .1 "f' - 1 v ,'y �� Iii k ray _�9I 1 "�eyo.v7 r r WV4R'l7e' IT I d q ry _� l�, krsr. i � rmvsrar,r �1 �H r0' 0.F- Y 1 I �.� 1 16a !61 x k 700 k m i r. �• W � 1!. Y la � tab l X111 m �- 1 �1 1M Ik+� 5"yr 8 8 8 48� � s J. 'x xi nt ik it !l f lop rb11.6.F rle.N' r >000dt ' 73 rn.7 •r i .10.4 �.y�•j-7' 1 v N®jao.na!�1 ta] 1a5 r1 WUE. tA% -L .te r' I 'Cr b�-1 P- jIl 1 RI 136 1•? -'.:OPE. i '7OE. d 'ill I .00' 4�.Oo' - W.; i3 xerzrvo-P 1 un' nd yp 2rp0Y �y -:. r e-'P1iAC✓:. �'r8'' -i ! I wrr.u's7•w I^ ' 'nl II i Re. - 1 rpp.(d ••_•---- �r1i%0 r .y 509'1Y11Y �•. 1 [O(MYIXt IMl, �''� 10Gar r F I 12m i,'•-_ J_ _ �1 166 fi rJ - Cl16 uE AD O.F. �.1 S l �Utww. XI Ft0 1 I I+ d9 rou'w 1 ^' P6vxrw-w YR. r5' r , 1646:1'6 F i ^' 9e9'W6�t 1 I '�' r 11 1 rx'� r 100.00' ,Ip,T'YR0'E 1 IYr.W, I 0 M + 9L9'N-F s. 'ioe:ia JJ i� 1r t ,F4-.1 iM4'S1'91•r 'PUHN �I I' el i7i Ri 167 $ •a leo i- 4 q� 119 i 11. g i I I 1 5897 Yoo.6 I I Hw'YYouW i 5LH L'❑ _ I '' ' x0973'!]1 1 IpIq`�F ul tI [ I W I ^1� lil 62 rr i '+�1 tee �+ ?BALT 4�8 i� tib $ gl �� tEr i i1 a --n- +3 c { _Iw.G�_ � � � i- A �- xl r' 1 � .. IWC � g�i t� .- ��r 1•� .� i k tra �1$ �1 � Ile � Ir .. III 1 1 x n •''fir z� In ^I Ifs:: Is .,M )MT I 7 4• i S0T]3'37'f y 'erx06�roow� irrrr cs&>4• • s,.s,•� .. 11 120.dT 1 3 �1 i1 4,Y,x.. 1 .�1 \ nbyl I' 7111 1 Br I nI 160 �._. in ro6vl 1, U Dex, S I w71136srrA ' I: I r0eA0' ��.-- .- III I �� 100.08 106.p6��r I71.ar 1 1 *3 g l l 1 l .j let C1 e0 Cr 04 $ X1!1 1 I3 LJ'l�ty 1 yi ) tib I �I 116 I 11+k 0[ wEg[ WIE IF I I' 1509'9 r00'6 !76.00' ' ��,[[[...... I LbD'aroo'P low . 7NAC1' C-8 rra3 •y. i ri6D'as'sr•.I lo6ud I �1 ' I"6 9 IwEA6r 1I0 u# ., ` ^••:69"56']9-E W.W! r11- tl nc rK66R6$r Ill !0' P.V.L ry- ED• v,u.E , ti [6E'y,HrfE1 1/0`I_.Id L6.E I? rf $ r.. q,E_AIW_nE. .f.ff.96- .•- _ 1 - 1d vYE. d P.4.L l I' ,! X11+ 1@ NM' ar. R'• •9.1.1 f6. /F.r�l�+ Oa dY .R 3i� 175-'p'd-H �'d1 118 ' III 1` 2 IITrr1�� w•= -f_ 6 _N69'SS'.fl'w SI 1 I 11 9M�Iw'E I - -r4 D.E 1 1 I S64Si'39t 1 I 5� 111 I i r00.pp' g ' $ 3 ro6Ad 1�i.Op' EuIl Y r., 1 r w wi�,d o.E. ki nx Id E �F3 11x• >Y 1 1 N68Y7Tq'P 1 1 1 A te6 ,= roe IM C $ lye •m v $ Ii0 w 17t $ ivaI ' ' + sa7snt "+ Yv1- �I i+ i ee i' �i ivaar iy�� •�¢ry1II 4- �- ._ i a- d- �� oe.00• �P �� 1n � rl� I�»� c l.s'a r 15r -fl IS' 0.E r 7 72 -or 1 e i �'---..__.. -..�_ 9LLU aO.W Ad Oi..Y nW' 11.56- n.ld r ' 11 x.eo' i� Eo ad ss i9' ,9.99' --- - -- -� -1�1--- 17r.er �r 1 �• iyi I so 1ti qry. rwnrJe•P sous ; � �� j �..-. x sar3rsrt__ 1nr.;r �SAJLS'fIC CiRCL� °y T° 'III 111.-r rs-b.e. - - - -- --- r 1 11 '1 111 4 .gi sxAZ'i'-k_i--- i.e. P. C.. ANO 1 I' I �y1 589]r30'E 90l,u' ��'oI r l 1129.43 67.50' Sr.08' 37.90' 36.13' .5,.1 s' 10.00' ri.00' SROd :6 66.60' 36.88 Sr.yry N+� l II1 � +c 1 90 C06 ''' x' C04 Y log L i�•Fi44dF- q. d 1 y i 0 __+i _ ___e7 rs _ "ka _m__ i6 _s.: _%. _W. I s�• _t�pe.`1�8�. $i_t � Y��' �F-, o� w5T_ - w tae ��•- � � om- j.Ia'Vi �S 0 V1frLA4�•Yti ssre9'xt 1;.61.es' - , _... s69srsE•E mese. - . 2W M eo' �5CALE M M r O O O O N J a N d CD It � nl6im nn fC •L mn,r �i55'I�' ••' 4%WL m �X 2 CL 513 xu• 6, M m ' C E V_ m S89YY; r a 5141Y•i tt1I6 IN6 wv 1'NRAR110 nl: WRY C. AmC 'v q( AN0 uAFVER 10 C rW. Sk'S sIN Rvx. �3E0 5x1 NWLEY 1112 Packet Pg. 723 Boundary Survey Existing Regal I Re -plat 9.A.7 Q Packet Pg. 724 LOCATI6NANAY nEM-:10 1 au nmiii SHUT INDEC TUF Fxv l,o ly' T, 'RAT FORM, IS T - OFFICIAL NPIA rRR xD DDINUIRD Ia.'W UL:IMbED I1W.FN AND WU UNDER W I'I RCL'M.'TAYCO RE y11FPFANT[:I1 FN k7li"1I7 BY ANS' OTNrR OFrAPHH' OR NIOIPA[ FORM OY 11L& PIA'!. THRRE MAI' FR nDDITWCiAL P,:RIRFI',]oYs THAT RR NOT REC'OfIAED ON "FIS Pial T. MAT RE FOUN 11 YNR PURFIC RCL`OR0. OF rim (Cr im. aL'MV'f:7'f]M'S L'CRT[f'[[Mi7ti . r.N. . A. w .�rs..:�iv M.in`m",c'."�n Of' 'il.��rr,.�i�;••;aaeo LOT F T I. REGAL ACRES PHASE ONE A REPLAT OF PORTIONS OF REGAL ACRES RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 49, PAGE 87 SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FEIFRVARY 2018 n��+xoN 2e :W ccrw r iP-iv ,K r'si upwu"acapi, `:i R"'T EI°�°` avr�e[ :i; >ewc ow,w awn.Z—Tnoa1...a• ...m o �„:, n .,.aa,,,ra. u>arrb K oryTorr easr F. n w4 M. um eisj =« ..e r`.w'w.�lr� w - r�rFr• w, n.s : TO . ,arra �,-rr-w.r w � .,.r.a � ewwilxc'rr"er ,: M.a .enn�"• w�+rr' ri, rr e.� Tres sW rft w w 1xttPvcnw .e. D[ rwgdrFrnp d ,K X r ur[ s w, rxf nnr:"n.rc .v is rani•,r. wr ni Feu vi v ±w n.i .n .`,v. _ ,- no.a 1rcRm anr>.• A[s, w sw sam r.e nr.o[[ [pr,yr, fiAaF. sw«x 1�ir�. [nH. rprS]. .Wr[ P L[ t Rpl'RUVRIS EtiC1YE8RI!IC RYJ[ VICES u��r°`r�„ M Y3�9:, d �3N�r-,�•aa ,Mrar, r:[HIVl.1 el NVY-Y[ IR Y rr nT. W S� •irt 1K�ti CO[H'R1 ATFORN nr• e....• ryn arca. ws 1� . a swx Cuumv cbmm1NN14 ,Pnqu, I.: rd:inwlnw• a - — ... wo—m rower ceu.r.. na.w nua. H, rules SHEET 1 OF 3 90MATION OT laAr v tw.. 1 n eu,N�,a, rue .Awl. w rn[a m T,.. .� aA� cwxo ,.. ...., ornneu vrx Aon w.s[ w� ry e[ . Dlw.le n r� , n tnaiin, Fa1..alr...««Drr.r nRPous .rn —1,r res IT .,, c.Fr .«. rd..rcc cnnFrn nxr., wn..[vvw.r,• •ter r..wle,..,,c[ • ,i M[1 � •� �+.w.ev.nl.r rr.Foss wlN c[sYar�.r r. uRcava.+: t•rl „w .mm wrnun .n, gmw.�,. ro- .._tt..«a m1 [..sor.n R[I.ox wcranw .�wsTF .Maw..®,�,..w ..«sr.wr_ avwlxMs•.r, Ice Ru.nN„la �`caTti-aa.ao•u `.!. re�..ue.,r. nrs IIS 'u"0 wM n ru ..,.. xi M.a..rE uualo�n [ i] , .r>?s+[wm.o� •a«,ralAflu raRrc.m IL.I ] xrrwi.[e,vr,�m m. wnewlz y 'r e.v,rx!1 O.C1 fD. Ace[sy aw MAI.,w.w.[ .I.wores .n1yr x,•�aryllr r. rv1. rwn+.+la. r urwtt se . t w r n e nE aMR —TI .,[ 1a. ,. ,ws"o�.m;m iv I,en[11-11re ...a .M w rre.�..rr.';o. [.�, .aa A rxp[v rp:WC,N nesh Ix[ eem[,m n ,F[ D2 +MTP mwDrrrT,x r[ryaFFO elx �trim,er •JPD. a[aPrwu R In mewr[ r[ttxawf D. W m TO ALL,.-..mn of w.atws[o .,sere W a.ra,l ON"' f: TieIN I. m�[Iroa e,a ryA,uX. w M11irm YDriI nx5,[NI wM ,H R i. ,r[ [p.:W WMn RnsiFlf e"9,Ix,.%r[ atlr ..ta.ISs a rinrnbr wE,re O,un- n wAa [[ .au, e Wx.n le o. �ea.�r�n rnwxcs sl 1w.A[. rlt .ln IFne"e esnx, . R raaaK,1, ur, aNa,uc a,.n r..r: wain .ears m T. n.nra Z wMou, �.x his �K.tv.� rnr Tee n.m.Kie � curio mwri W cuMD ,KZ l.C'Jrr,s m � N�rK Cas.lvhem— 1aR�SC er C� Hrelw rn. nww : a mis. ccur+,. rc ACIW97FUipCLENT sw wx4°r-Fu. :�ri.e�.'oen ..--TT •:"-.".. FoR 1aavwri t. wli. wwv n wed ao .- � As a Packet Pg. 725 9.A.7 q REGAL ACRES PHASE ONE V LA 1 tiV V K --n- ' SHEETS 0 3 qMN cel A REPLAT OF PORTIONS Or RCGAL ACRES RECORDED 1N PLAT BOOK 49, PAGE 87 SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA _ cuc .r. ,av or.E R .uresrc cMcu. x �'�� '4��1 G1iGFSNO �rlrk[ta�•� NOTES I YI�...w .K w5.�0. 1i[ /la W. +rax mow,¢ C�.I• �,f. sw,e�.� r Wiv.rnr, a wwi.'e. mla .w m. w.w•*. o.�:r' ,�iadrw r�rrc°w o '"�`... ,_ i .0 yruar k.xgi wu R arec..il .ae •aN Mw muaaei(n �rx ti 4* tc.ncx c.cov'�..n L m Iw . iacM�V M. vL.nrr. r o. urw.1. Ismm � r w,w ccs 11 L"= _ ur tirr r .ar rw6ic.n: nes �i e+ gra nft.r.+ rrunrcr. .n.n�w,� ■ - � �rw,.crj Packet Pg. 726 Ir-I,a x H r - gQ I 1I�,�4laxA I - �_�YL �yYY•Lxi[eY'F4��.�. � .�-� -•.-. ... ��-� .... ..�� -.i' _lu--. _.__ ____ __-.,_ _____ ____ _____ _— _—__ -- ..} j.__ _—_ ._ _ __-. R .uresrc cMcu. x �'�� '4��1 G1iGFSNO �rlrk[ta�•� NOTES I YI�...w .K w5.�0. 1i[ /la W. +rax mow,¢ C�.I• �,f. sw,e�.� r Wiv.rnr, a wwi.'e. mla .w m. w.w•*. o.�:r' ,�iadrw r�rrc°w o '"�`... ,_ i .0 yruar k.xgi wu R arec..il .ae •aN Mw muaaei(n �rx ti 4* tc.ncx c.cov'�..n L m Iw . iacM�V M. vL.nrr. r o. urw.1. Ismm � r w,w ccs 11 L"= _ ur tirr r .ar rw6ic.n: nes �i e+ gra nft.r.+ rrunrcr. .n.n�w,� ■ - � �rw,.crj Packet Pg. 726 9.A.7 REGAL ACRES PHASE ONE 1PLAT IMOh 5q SO ENGINEERING A REPLAT OF PORTIONS OF REGAL ACRES SHEET 3 OF 3 RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 49, PAGE 87 SECTION 12, TOWNSHIPS I SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAPAW / ___ TM F. �.- � 8; b e . i In ,W rw.=, ,.. pa • ,N •,r. ,oam I. ,d'�•1r1 �w:r e +gin e� mw [ n I rx �,r pe � i � � � � • � "r oF�� I �,' � I ,..or=n'm .r n I rm ,>a � IN .m �.pr,r,m.or '° '° .p.zrpploe.ar` --•-- ][t I - _�_._... V� Is6pv,r<,m,.• _ n - --------------- pr a .... X1.._ __ 3==- -..._ ..._.....--.•---- • T IT vm,Jerm ... •'^°-�ror. ,o[<v" � a�lm uwn. -' "'-;.m � sz ar .ox.• .ren e1 g; � t ns Ic �a[.0-4 aR x.-n.rre nor �s].r 1 s.r]rarr el.w naoY [reee•' ]Yar ,a]MW n,5+,]r[ e2 1635 #rG fl' �1v xl ee wivm �;- n] .sar •.u,e• • ,err � _'�stas.rrea-ti-i : _ F, ; I..E nc, � µ• .._ �n. _. = ��-- - ,u' .:,:,X]neiw.� � 1.. .VA€-,3L�' I wa.ti =rK C�a nar 6zd'eC v'xrt [ W v e6ee wrar za'16T ur ooT nYr rrx�r IT _ [ui ",Yr -w r ' , �rav� • n. vpm wxa r ... paz!'oV. In ec I �n' V�rviroY. Ivam- a .ear �nr,r .-. ,o l •fir'_ rr ,u00D' , .er, ,re N�• uo.• •[r.r.r ,r. �• n,s 1e0 ' •�•]Ywti ,m[c ear. .ckE� ua1l[ . .. iii �- TSvirm u �w cr• p.ce' wKO.' � v v2 f1.1tl n.os rm,x ,um- M i lrlr NNW r.a6W x,paroe', ... ta, ec ^ �i ` ,efvr.6- 5.e•xY. waY lil Ili , ze.��! , W 161 i ep � �' tre Ir[ I n � .. � �� ], eoaer -.. ! V l V � V ' I _-?c '� r' �• Si•`.-.p..en J _ - r-.- i,enr u � - ' # Ira i I, --- ql� i x:.�.•+-roo'r ,orad 'vac � x I � le.ec ' x �kirC:PlA°'��'� " a I II , I qi 61 8 t °° W r A r I ' , '° Y I[5 1�14r][7, 1m..a' y'r -• � A llr{--,Ile � � y:.br 116 � "� n� ki .— -----�„x�--•—•"nuE•r'R`�---- �s'a . I•'• Ww.M e[.,L. r tee. wd eV l r �a• � • p w F r6 w a 6. w ,w +m � 1w eos .o. .w �.- I i I I � g � � i � � � � i � - • T IT vm,Jerm ... Packet Pg. 727 m*,�wom w K' a�lm uwn. -' "'-;.m n.6,• war sz ar .ox.• .ren ,.,�• ener e. ea !ri•w• x.-n.rre nor �s].r naoY [reee•' ]Yar ,a]MW n,5+,]r[ e2 1635 #rG fl' �1v n] .sar •.u,e• y6•rn ,err a�e.amr cl[ ar 1sraY wa.ti =rK C�a nar 6zd'eC v'xrt [ W v e6ee wrar za'16T ur ooT nYr rrx�r IT ]6 m• ,6eY Gar IT6I-.r ",Yr -w r a] sear .�r,r �rav� cr mor n. vpm wxa r senr]6e A rr .. w a .ear �nr,r w.Trw•. >s• ]r.er �m6. ,.•].]� r,,,t N�• uo.• •[r.r.r ,r. �• n,s nrr ,r5eror n pp• n]w•v ear. .w.pr ,n.aa• er cA tiem• —'1r : —11 W. ,. uv cr• p.ce' wKO.' � v v2 f1.1tl n.os rtco' ,avcSY Hf-ivtrl lrlr NNW r.a6W x,paroe', n ,efvr.6- 5.e•xY. waY Packet Pg. 727 Boundary Survey 23.15 -acre Addition 9.A.7 Q Packet Pg. 728 on°3 Boon "LE'LAjD .1A N -2 AIE 0 50 100 200 (INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE: 1"=100') rrm. n.v NOTES: 1, DATA .1 NELD Al D. .11, 2 —NONATES NO H- DATA N"`QN `NEAT AND A P,OXC7EO ONA IINE EOO1EI.ATE E - l9 E. .1R1 ADICAN DAII 1 1111SDI — AD117, -RI.. EN ON ARE ..D ON — WRTI LINE OF 1�, IRAN. Ol E- -ENEN l.D ..TN LINE FpLA1N111'N.C1E 611`�OED ZZEAIA'IDE1, 7)—S ASH�V` X X DO PANEL NI.— 12121C -D T. E -CT. DATE unr 1s. 6 R "AN -S NOT LO' A� 11- 611ON91AIIO"EI.ROACNIENTO, NET LICATED A TART .1 ms ll 7, TNID SUN— 15 -NT TO ANY "' T"Ay 8E E- "LL AND 'DE"ATE _ 'A'EN A D;1 _11NEIT MI AXTON`AJyOA TIE was NOT PROW TO DIE R DEUNRI RNSIA&I N��*KE,AY"RETPNEOENTON Al ZON'.D OR N, NO —E—ENTAL ASlrl`RyR A,�ITpAS,N,ORMEDNNDIE HERE" AND "' NOT "I" "y REPRE"'T"IN AS "'NEADON 0' All 1R.OICIONI 11I EXEEPT A� � 111OD TI. -1Y DOI NET P'RP'RT TI 11111ATE IE R1111-1 IR-11ON OT ANY 1EDERAL, lTA7E 01 IDEAL AGENCY 10 M 11NIVY LOMSINIOT OE�M.'I�ERPRIOPEAR��IROI"�S�IPIORA.PRONP�� ZVI I THE 11U � N ANNE IE -AL 11, ADE—S OR TELETON8 70 DT$ IUR 4AP O� EE T 8Y ODHEP THAN TIE _'I 'ATTY _U n E _N M SENT � TNE _2 p 12.0`TSTE E—ME— OENETTNG TIE 1ECT NN- ARE .0. ONLY ..E TIEY ONN_ To THE SA,,C7 _T, 11-1D 11RIEL 1-11 -ARE OR A— IORE 14 AERIA_ PHOTTR,�HY"SHX7��El�TAI�0181TRPNOSE�S�ONL�' .'.' AND DA'D "17 N, ON 9.A.7 z lVE NEAI Nov u A, LL L 5D T NAA- "n.E.T=U.= I -Tl RATAL ....... 40' DRAI.A. EHA.NEL 100 12 Q.) DO( PnRa 080808 0 IE AE11 1/2 1 11 EA11 1n 0' 11 EA11 1/2 a 11 3.aiTM oP ,IE MORE EA_ 1 OT _,TN " /�DNE TIE NDETI 1EE1 — IS RE� D POIR/P PEOT CH N89-7 -E 339,83(C) 1)'AN "S.D 'AN, " 1/i .1 — EAlT 1/` DI .1IT. 12, -P 51 S- NANDE lO EA5T6FE -NG — N- lD _ P_ p,._, OF DNE I—E EE—.O 0' —. E..1 —IN., TIE NE- 339.££ '10) -M F—Al D—EIDED P „o E—CEL No, 00738280008 _l. P, "l) " " 'E "' '/' " " N' cc TNE "1 1 /. .1 E Ol C, - ER 1AN.E Ol E AP -RED BY TAX DEED 01-A ECONDS DOON ODNT, PA, CN, �,� DT TDOETHEN THE —..0D, T- I.,. 1A111 (DR. IE KIT 1/1 oT IE 11T 1/1 1 TIE NEDIAEOT 1/1 01 11 1 i—11T 1, l..,"EANDE IT 1/1 1 "N ow AMll TNE ORTN lD FEET —NE. .N`�'DAD` .Z P.El M . PAA11L .iol 1.111,10, CO. 2 . .. ... ) (IEI TIE —..EYI TNE .R1 0. IEET 01 — N-T 1/1 (.w 1/°) 0' TNE ._ '44 RANGE 26 EA ' .T -1. -1 1. THE —T ,/z 1 1/1 �121 11RINE1 1/1 01 TTE NEA1T 1/1. ALl. INl E.N.. AO -- IE "T 1`11�OMT N." '�" I FEET 1 '12'. N_ 1/ —A T �/. � CTON 11 S.— OD EAOI EELL. E.N1 —RIEA ti NOTES: 1, DATA .1 NELD Al D. .11, 2 —NONATES NO H- DATA N"`QN `NEAT AND A P,OXC7EO ONA IINE EOO1EI.ATE E - l9 E. .1R1 ADICAN DAII 1 1111SDI — AD117, -RI.. EN ON ARE ..D ON — WRTI LINE OF 1�, IRAN. Ol E- -ENEN l.D ..TN LINE FpLA1N111'N.C1E 611`�OED ZZEAIA'IDE1, 7)—S ASH�V` X X DO PANEL NI.— 12121C -D T. E -CT. DATE unr 1s. 6 R "AN -S NOT LO' A� 11- 611ON91AIIO"EI.ROACNIENTO, NET LICATED A TART .1 ms ll 7, TNID SUN— 15 -NT TO ANY "' T"Ay 8E E- "LL AND 'DE"ATE _ 'A'EN A D;1 _11NEIT MI AXTON`AJyOA TIE was NOT PROW TO DIE R DEUNRI RNSIA&I N��*KE,AY"RETPNEOENTON Al ZON'.D OR N, NO —E—ENTAL ASlrl`RyR A,�ITpAS,N,ORMEDNNDIE HERE" AND "' NOT "I" "y REPRE"'T"IN AS "'NEADON 0' All 1R.OICIONI 11I EXEEPT A� � 111OD TI. -1Y DOI NET P'RP'RT TI 11111ATE IE R1111-1 IR-11ON OT ANY 1EDERAL, lTA7E 01 IDEAL AGENCY 10 M 11NIVY LOMSINIOT OE�M.'I�ERPRIOPEAR��IROI"�S�IPIORA.PRONP�� ZVI I THE 11U � N ANNE IE -AL 11, ADE—S OR TELETON8 70 DT$ IUR 4AP O� EE T 8Y ODHEP THAN TIE _'I 'ATTY _U n E _N M SENT � TNE _2 p 12.0`TSTE E—ME— OENETTNG TIE 1ECT NN- ARE .0. ONLY ..E TIEY ONN_ To THE SA,,C7 _T, 11-1D 11RIEL 1-11 -ARE OR A— IORE 14 AERIA_ PHOTTR,�HY"SHX7��El�TAI�0181TRPNOSE�S�ONL�' .'.' AND DA'D "17 N, ON 9.A.7 z lVE NEAI Nov u A, LL L 5D T NAA- "n.E.T=U.= I -Tl RATAL ....... 40' DRAI.A. EHA.NEL 100 12 Q.) w" < L 0 cc FIT 11,0K o M . ti C) CD z < CD LL 0 Z _j dw D < 0. U) z - 0. I W _LL cc A ED Z�111.. ED, FINE NO 0.. PE— aR EN— Nnr .1 ON DIO .—I E I HE Y E'RIFY 1' TIE "'T " A NO — AND m APPLE— S'O E PROI NO DI CHAP;OEEN� 0 ILMIDA ADIIIM 'WE . .... . T T&`471. HDA BOUNC M SURV 411111 NA -1 I H "AND R. .2) l F—DA 1FIE ..EET L DATE ..ED: 10 NOT -0 "THOUT TNE SQNR�ZU A— OEAL OF A _DA L,,,D U, NO M IN EERTIT—ON S 70 DATE � _AST nE.D -N Al ORWPNEAl NASED - OTHER DOCUMENTATION - CERTIFICATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXPEDITED FAST-TRACK REVIEW Packet Pg. 730 CERTIFICATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXPEDITED FAST-TRACK REVIEW Name of Development: Regal Acres PUD Location: Greenway Road Naples, FL Applicant /Agent: Habitat for Humanity of Collier County- Nick Kouloheras Johnson Engineering - Laura DeJohn Contact Information: NickKouloherasPHabitatCollier.org LKS@JohnsonEng.com Size of Property: 36.75 acres (existing PUD) + 23.84 acres (proposed addition Proposed Use: Residential PUD Total Number Residential Units Planned: 184 existing + 119 proposed additional Number of Affordable Housing Units Planned: 81% - 150%MI - GAP Owner Occupied 81% - 100%MI - Workforce - Moderate Income Owner Occupied 61% - 80%Ml - Workforce - Low Income Owner Occupied 51% - 60% MI - Low Income Owner Occupied 184 existing + 119 prODosed additional 51% - 60% MI - Low Income Rental 50% or less MI - Very Low Income Owner Occupied 50% or less MI - Very Low Income Rental Proposed Land Use Restriction: X - PUD Restriction or AHDB Agreement - Developer Agreement - Impact Fee Agreement - Other: I hereby certify that the above described project meets the definition of providing affordable Housing in Collier County and as such is entitled to participate in the County's "Expedited Review Procedures of Affordable Housing" as described in the Collier County Administrative Code through Resolution No. 2007-176. By: Date: -% Cormac J. Giblin, A1CP Housing and Grant Development Manager Community and Human Services Division 9.A.7 Community & Human Services Division - 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 211 Naples, Florida 34112-5351 239-252-CARE..(2273) • 23.9-252-wA (2233) . 239-252-4230 (RSVP) • wwW.colliergov.not/humanserVices Packet Pg. 731 - OTHER DOCUMENTATION - SCHOOL DISTRICT REVIEW I 9.A.7 I Packet Pg. 732 9.A.7 Planned Unit School District Review Development to PUD Approved 02/20/2018 02/20/2018 Rezone Reviewer: James Sabo ((239) 252-2708) Send Email Correction 1: Miscellaneous Corrections Resolved 02/20/2018 Status: Date Status Changed: Comments: A School District Review was requested of Collier County Schools. No Review Comments were provided. However, review comments from the Collier Schools may be forthcoming. School District Review provided on 2/20/18 by Amy Lockhart: At this time there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development either within the concurrency service areas the development is located within or the adjacent concurrency service areas at the elementary, middle and high school levels. This finding is for planning and informational purposes only and does not constitute either a reservation of capacity or a finding of concurrency for the proposed project. At the time of site plan or plat the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity within the concurrency service area the development is located within and adjacent concurrency service areas such that the level of service standards are not exceeded. Packet Pg. 733 . 4- rict School 1�zcollliemr Coin` 9.A.7 Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [�] type of application request (one only): QSchool Capacity Review Exemption Letter QConcurrency Determination Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, I. Project information: Project Name: Regal Acres II Municipality: collier county This reflects the added parcels; not existing Regal I parcels. Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): 00737760008 / 00741080606 f 00738260008 i 00737720006 / 00741100104 Location/Address of subject property: Northwest of us 41 and Greenway Road Closest Major Intersection: us 41 and Greenway Road II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s): Habitat for Humanity of Collier County (Attach location map) Agent/Contact Person: Nick Kouloheras (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: 11145 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34114 Telephone#: (239) 775-0036 Fax: (239) 775-0477 Email nkouloheras@habitatcollier.org I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Owner or Agent Signature III. Development Information Date Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Agriculture Proposed Land Use Designation: Residential Current Zoning: A Proposed Zoning: RPU D Project Acreage: - Unit Type: SF I MFC G Total Units Current/ Allowed b Type: Total Units Proposed b Type: 116 Is this a phasedproject: Yes o No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp: Packet Pg. 734 Worksheet is required to be completed by the Applicant only if the project is to be phased: Unit Type Yrl Yr2 YO I Yr4 Yrs I Yr6 YO I Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 I Yr 11-20 20+ Years SF 58 58 MF MH C G Totals by Yr - 58 58 - -- - Grand Total Insert totals by unit type by years. Unit Types: SF = Single Family MF = Multi-Family/Apartments MH = Mobile Homes C = Condo/Co-Op G = Government Unit Type Yrl Yr2 YO Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ Years SF 25 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MF 50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MH N/A C N/A G N/A Totals by Yr 75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Grand Total 1 116 Grand Total 1 150 9.A.7 a 76 a� a� o_ M M 0 0 0 r 0 N J a N 0 a �o 2 M d R a U M m c a� E U a 2 Packet Pg. 735 9.A.7 Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: - School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; - Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. a) L Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether Q there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination a� Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a 0 project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation M period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have g an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no 0 impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. a N Exemption Letter: a An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects �o that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or A change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or, residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. a Concurrency Determination Amendment: CO r An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency E determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a L) negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being Q modified and reissued. Packet Pg. 736 I 9.A.7 I -OTHER DOCUMENTATION AUTHORIAATION FOR INTERCONNECTION OF LAKE SYSTEM Q Packet Pg. 737 AUTHORIZATION FOR INTERCONNECTION OF LAKE SYSTEM REGAL ACRES Date: 4/12/18 Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. is the developer of Regal Acres PUD adopted by Ordinance 05-36. Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. is the developer of the Regal Acres subdivision is recorded in Plat Book 49, Page 87 with portions replatted in Plat Book 54, Page 48. Within the existing Regal Acres subdivision, drainage easements for stormwater management purposes and Tracts L-1 and L-2 as lakes for stormwater management purposes are dedicated to the Regal Acres Homeowners' Association Inc. per Plat book 49, Page 87 and Plat Book 54, Page 48. Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc. seeks to develop a stormwater management system within property identified by the following folio numbers (known as Regal Acres II, or "Parcel B"): 00737720006,007411.00104,00737760008,00741080606,00738280008 The stormwater management system is proposed to interconnect with the existing Regal Acres subdivision lake system including Tracts L-1 and L-2 and drainage easements for stormwater management purposes. Regal Acres Homeowners' Association, Inc. authorizes Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc., its successors and assigns, to apply for and develop a stormwater management system that interconnects with the existing Regal Acres subdivision lake system including Tracts L-1 and L-2 and drainage easements for stormwater management purposes. Signed: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. Developer of Regal Acres PUD and Regal Acres subdivision crye–/ XAI'I;Zle�— z Name: Title: REGAL ACRES HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC. Ems- laka- Name: Title: p f'e,,s � 1 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 738 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.B 09/06/2018 Item Summary: PUDZ-PL20170004414 Russell Square: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district with a portion of the real property in a ST overlay (Special Treatment) to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Russell Square RPUD to allow development of up to 230 multi -family dwelling units on property located east of Santa Barbara Boulevard and approximately 1/4 mile south of Davis Boulevard in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 32.9+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: C. James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 09/06/2018 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: James Sabo 08/20/2018 6:16 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning — Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 08/20/2018 6:16 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Michael Bosi Review Item Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Zoning Zoning Growth Management Department Planning Commission Ray Bellows Review Item Camden Smith Review Item James C French Review Item Mark Strain Meeting Pending 9.B Completed 08/21/2018 10:53 AM Completed 08/21/2018 11:24 AM Review Item Completed Completed 08/22/2018 2:50 PM Completed 08/23/2018 12:52 PM Completed 08/23/2018 6:25 PM 09/06/2018 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 739 9.B.a AGENDA ITEM 9-13 Coi ier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2018 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20170004414 RUSSELL SQUARE PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Applicant/Contract Purchaser: Neal Communities of Southwest FL, LLC James Schier, Vice President 5800 Lakewood Branch Boulevard N. Sarasota, FL 34240 Owners: Cross and Thompson LLC, John D. Bruce, Kathleen M. Tetrault Revocable Trust and Robert L. Tetrault Revocable Trust. Please, see Property Ownership Disclosure Form for more details. REQUESTED ACTION: Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail N. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 The applicant is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone the property from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district with a portion of the property in a special treament (ST) Overlay to a Residential Planned Unit Development (R -PUD) zoning district for a residential housing project known as Russell Square RPUD. The property is comprised of seven parcels under a contract purchase agreement. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 32.89 acres and is located east of Santa Barbara Road and south of the intersection of Santa Barbara and Davis Boulevard in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (see location map, page 2). The proposed Master Plan is included as Attachment B. PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Revised: August 20, 2018 Page 1 of 18 Packet Pg. 740 �m W •o �g o � O 3a gg E9 � J 9I �� 9e ��a gQ !@ •� �� G i LL L<L. p y P y 9a 9a a � a � �i e e e cif It111111111i114�r � �itr �� errs*rr�� i_ W •o �g o � O 3a gg E9 � J 9I �� 9e ��a gQ !@ •� �� G i LL L<L. p y P y 9a 9a a � a � �i e e e cif It111111111i114�r � �itr �� errs*rr�� i_ ._ : . ��ii � " ■irr�� uiu hD` �i� ■■■ �"'I 1lIIIIIIIfl11111' � „' 111111111 ' �11 • - 11 PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Revised: August 20, 2018 9.B.a O N =i O U J Page 2 of 18 m c`a a as N N 0 CDO ti O N J CL N CL 00 to co Packet Pg. 741 9.B.a PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting a rezoning from Rural Agricultural to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for the purpose of constructing 230 multiple -family residential units. The rezoning proposal is to assemble parcels under separate ownership on 32.9 acres of land and establish a new PUD named Russell Square. The roadway layout, preserve areas, water management areas, amenity and residential areas, required buffers, and requested deviations are detailed on the proposed Master Plan. The general pattern and style of the proposed housing development will be very similar to the multiple -family product developed at the Avalon of Naples PUD, which is also being developed by Neal Communities LLC. The applicant has proposed Development Standards and Developer Commitments. The applicant is requesting several deviations. Specific details for these requests are in the Deviation Discussion Section of this report. The base density permitted is four dwelling units per acre (DU/A), and the project is located within a Residential Density Band. The applicant is seeking three additional dwelling units per acre increasing the total DU/A to seven. The total number of dwelling units proposed is 230 units. The density bonus calculation review is detailed in the GMP Consistency Review of this report. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Vacant, zoned MPUD Taorimina Reserve 5.79 DU/A, A Rural Agricultural South: Vacant, zoned A Rural Agricultural East: Vacant, single-family houses, zoned A Agricultural, PUD Naples Heritage Golf 1.43 DU/A West: Multiple -family residential, zoned PUD Falling Waters 5.07 DU/A PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 3 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 742 9.B.a GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, and it's within a Residential Density Band (Mixed -Use Activity Center #6) on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the GMP. Policy 5.3 in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) states, in part, "All rezonings must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan." Staff reviewed the proposed land use for consistency with the FLUE. The FLUE states, "Urban designated areas will accommodate... (a) Residential uses including single family, multi -family, duplex, and mobile home. The maximum densities allowed are identified in the Districts, Subdistricts, and Overlays..." A base density of residential dwelling units per gross acre may be allowed in the Urban Designated Area, though this is not an entitlement. This base level of density may be adjusted as determined through the Density Rating System depending upon the location and characteristics of the project. As stated in the Future Land Use Element, "The purpose of the Urban Residential Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 4 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 743 9.B.a The Density Rating System states, "(b). Proximity to Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center: If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, three residential units per gross acre may be added. The density band around a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map." Because this project site is located within one mile of Activity Center #6 at the intersection of Davis Blvd. (SR84), and Santa Barbara Blvd., it is eligible for the Residential Density Band Bonus. The FLUE also states, "The final determination of permitted density via implementation of this Density Rating System is made by the Board of County Commissioners through an advertised public hearing process (rezone or Stewardship Receiving Area designation)." This project is eligible for a base density of four residential DU/A and is eligible for a density bonus of three additional dwelling units per acre for being located within the Residential Density Band for Activity Center #6 — for a total eligibility of seven DU/A (4 DU/A base + 3 DU/A density band bonus = 7 DU/A). The maximum number of dwelling units allowable is 230 dwelling units (32.9 acres * 7 DU/A = 230.3 dwelling units rounded to 230.) The petitioner's request for 230 dwelling units is consistent with the FLUE. The Consistency Review is included as Attachment C. Based upon analysis by the Comprehensive Planning Division, the proposed PUD rezone may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 5 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 744 9.B.a C. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " The proposed Residential PUD request on the subject property was reviewed based on the applicable 2017 AUIR Inventory Report. The TIS submitted in the application indicates that the existing PUD generates approximately 1,172 PM peak hour two-way trips and 894 PM peak two- way Net trips (Net trips include pass -by traffic). The proposed development will impact the following roadway segments: Roadway Link 2017 Current Peak 2017 AUIR AUIR Hour Peak Remaining Existing Direction Service Capacity LOS Volume/Peak Direction Santa Barbara Davis B 3,100/South 2,098 Boulevard Boulevard to Rattlesnake Hammock Road Santa Barbara Davis B 3,100/North 1,537 Boulevard Boulevard to Radio Road Davis Santa Barbara C 2,200/East 1,584 Boulevard Boulevard to County Barn Road Davis Santa Barbara to B 2,900/East 2,037 Boulevard Radio Road Based on the 2017 AUIR, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the projected trips for the proposed PUD within the 5 -year planning period. Transportation Planning Staff is recommending approval of the petition with the following condition: The Master Plan shall be revised to show an interconnection north to the Taormina Reserve PUD. A developer commitment will be added to the PUD Document that requires the interconnection to be included as part of the first SDP or Plat or ROW permit approval and constructed before the first CO of any residential units. Staff is basing this condition of approval on the following: PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 6 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 745 9.B.a Transportation Element Policy 9.3, which states: "The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets." LDC 4.07.02.J.4 4. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to encourage smooth traffic flow and minimize hazards to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Merging and turn lanes and/or traffic dividers shall be required where existing or anticipated heavy traffic flows indicate need. The interconnection of collector and local streets within the PUD to adjacent lands or developments shall be required except where determined by the County Manager or designee that an interconnection is not feasible or warranted due to existing development patterns, transportation network needs, or the like. Interconnection of local streets shall be designed to discourage through traffic, and not adversely impact local streets in the neighboring residential areas. Where streets within the district intersect adjoining streets, visibility triangle shall be maintained. At issue with this zoning request is the northern extension of Sunset Boulevard providing interconnection to the Taormina Reserve PUD which contains a developer commitment to provide interconnection of Sunset Boulevard. In making this determination staff finds, consistent with LDC 4.07.02.J.4, that the required interconnection is an extension of a local roadway and neighborhood network to adjacent land and developments. Staff further finds that the interconnection is feasible. The interconnection is not likely to adversely impact the local streets, because it is a new extension and continuation of an existing roadway to the future mixed-use development at Taormina Reserve. TRANSPORTATION STAFF CONDITION OF APPROVAL: The Master Plan shall be revised to show an interconnection north to the Taormina Reserve PUD. A developer commitment will be added to the PUD Document that requires the interconnection to be included as part of the first SDP or Plat or ROW permit approval and constructed before the first CO of any residential units. PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 7 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 746 9.B.a Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (COME). The project site consists of 13.88 acres of native vegetation and tree preservation requirement of hundred ten (110) trees. A minimum of 3.47 (25%) acres of the existing native vegetation shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. Drainage: The proposed PUD rezone request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will also evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of site development plan (SDP) and/or platting (PPL). Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the RPUD petition to address environmental concerns. The PUD Master Plan provides a 3.47 -acre preserve, which meets the minimum 25% native preservation requirement in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07.A. L In addition to the 3.47 -acre preserve, 28 native trees (25% of the existing 110 trees) will be required. The four parcels located adjacent to Santa Barbara Boulevard have been partially cleared and historically used as pasture land. LDC section 3.05.07.A.2 requires tree preservation of existing trees on land where the understory has been removed and maintained as lawn or pasture. The trees will be located in areas in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07.A.2. as follows: This planted open space shall be in addition to the area used to satisfy the minimum landscape requirements pursuant to 4.06.00. In lieu of using actual canopy coverage, the following average diameter for tree canopies may be used to calculate canopy coverage of existing trees: slash pine 40 feet, cypress 25 feet, live oak 60 feet, and cabbage palm 10 feet. Open space areas not normally planted with trees, such as stormwater retention areas or lake banks not planted to meet the LSPA requirement, may be used to satisfy this requirement. Trees planted to satisfy this requirement shall be set back a minimum of 30 feet from principal structures and impervious parking areas. No listed animal species were observed on the property. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends Approval of this PUD request with the recommended transportation planning condition. Landscape Review: The landscape buffers depicted on the Master Plan are consistent with the LDC requirements. The petitioner is seeking a deviation, Deviation #9, to allow for no buffers where the preserve and water management area abut Taormina Reserve's existing preserve areas, as depicted on the Master Plan, Exhibit C. See Deviation Discussion Section. PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 8 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 747 9.B.a School District: At this time, the School District has not provided a review. However, they may provide a review at a later date for concurrency and to ensure there is capacity within the concurrency service area. Utilities Review: The project lies within the potable water and the south wastewater service areas of the Collier County Water -Sewer District. Water and wastewater services are not readily available but will be extended to the project from existing infrastructure along Whitaker Road and possibly Falling Waters Blvd. System capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit (SDP or PPL) review, and a commitment to provide service will be established upon permit approval. Zoninz Services Review: Zoning Division staff has evaluated the proposed uses related to their intensity and reviewed the proposed development standards for the project. The Zoning Division also evaluated the location project and the potential traffic generation. The proposed multiple -family residential project is located south of Davis Boulevard and north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road in an area that is still largely zoned Estates. The applicant, Neal Communities intends to assemble several Estates zoned lots for their project. However, there has been additional higher density residential development along this portion of Santa Barbara. Falling Waters PUD is across the street to the west with 5.07 DU/A and the proposed Russell Square PUD rezone is intended to be a similar density project. The proposed site is currently vacant and wooded with several single-family homes on Estates lots. There are two nearby neighborhoods developed as PUD, which are Taorimina Reserve, Naples Heritage Golf. Both adjacent PUD's are developed with lower density. The Taorimina Reserve PUD was approved at 5.79 DU/A and the Naples Heritage Golf PUD was developed at 1.43 DU/A. The intensity of the development appears to be reasonable and has been found consistent with the GMP. With respect to Development Standards, the proposed standards are appropriate based on the multiple -family residential use. The Development Standards are included in the backup material. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": (Zoning Division staff responses in non -bold) 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Zoning Division staff has reviewed the proposed rezoning request and has concluded the uses and property development regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area. The Public Utilities Division further states water and wastewater services are not readily available but will be extended to the project from existing infrastructure along PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 9 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 748 9.B.a Whitaker Road and possibly Falling Waters Blvd. There is adequate water and wastewater treatment capacity to serve the proposed PUD. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and demonstrate unified control. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the petition and analyzed it for consistency with goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. They have found the proposed amendment to be consistent with the GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Landscape Division staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. There is no deviation from the required usable open space as submitted. Compliance with approved standards would be demonstrated at the time of SDP. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Compliance with all other applicable concurrency management regulations is required, including but not limited to plat plans or site development plans. The Transportation Division further states the roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the consistency review, however for consistency with the GMP Transportation Element, Staff is providing the condition of approval noted. The Public Utilities Division further states Collier County has sufficient treatment capacity for water and wastewater service to the project. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans. PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 10 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 749 9.B.a 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. For the proposed multi -family residential use, there is adequate supporting infrastructure to accommodate this project, including Collier County Water -Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains. Adequate public facility requirements will be addressed when future development approvals are sought. The Public Utilities Division further states that the area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including Collier County Water -Sewer District potable water mains, to accommodate this project. The scope of any system improvements will be determined at the time of SDP or PPL permit review. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. Nine deviations are proposed in the request to rezone to RPUD. Please see the Deviation Discussion Section of the report. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below: (Zoning Division staff responses in non -bold): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff has determined the petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern related to surrounding properties is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this report. The proposed multiple -family residential uses will not likely change the existing land use patterns in the area. Both Naples Heritage Golf and Taorimina PUD's are developed with a single-family residential pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts The property is zoned Rural Agricultural with some RPUD residential uses near the property. The application is to rezone to RPUD, which would not create an isolated district. PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 11 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 750 9.B.a 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed RPUD boundaries are logical and appropriate. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not specifically necessary. However, the applicant believes the rezoning is necessary to accommodate the construction of multiple -family residential units in Collier County. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change is not likely to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The existing neighborhood is lower density residential and the proposal is additional residential dwellings that are multiple -family. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review, however for consistency with the GMP, Transportation Staff is providing the condition of approval noted. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. It is not anticipated that the rezone request to RPUD will create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage for this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County environmental staff will evaluate the stormwater management system and design criteria at the time of SDP or PPL. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed rezone to RPUD is not likely to reduce light or air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. Property value is affected by many factors. It is driven by market conditions and is generally a subjective determination. Zoning alone is not likely to adversely affect the property values. Generally, market conditions will prevail. PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 12 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 751 9.B.a 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Most of the adjacent property is already developed as residential use. The approval of the rezone request from A to RPUD is not likely to deter development activity of surrounding property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed rezone to RPUD complies with the GMP and is found consistent, then it is consistent with public policy and the change does not result in the granting of a special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is determined to be consistent with public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning, however, it is near other residentially developed property, and the applicant intends to utilize the density band bonus. Additionally, the applicant cannot use the property as they have proposed without rezoning to RPUD and getting approval. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The Zoning Division staff determination is the proposed uses are not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The application was reviewed and found compliant with the GMP and the LDC. The Zoning Division staff does not review other sites related to a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the proposed rezone request to RPUD would require significant site alteration. The site is vacant and wooded with lower density single-family uses. Both razing and land balancing would be required prior to any development activity at the site. The development standards would be applied during the SDP and plat process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 13 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 752 9.B.a Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project must comply with the criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF) and must be consistent with applicable goals and objectives of the GMP related to adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by Comprehensive Planning staff for consistency with the GMP as part of the amendment process, and they find it to be consistent. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The Public Utilities Division further states the activity proposed by this proposed rezoning will have no adverse impact on public utilities facility adequacy. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking nine deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The petitioner's rationale and staff analysis/recommendation is outlined below. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height, to allow a temporary banner sign up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and 8 feet in height. The temporary banner sign shall be limited to a maximum of 90 days during season defined as November 1 to April 30 per calendar year. This Deviation will remain valid until 90% of the units are sold or until December 31, 2024, whichever comes first. At such time, the Deviation will be void. Petitioner's Justification: The proposed deviation will allow for a banner sign located on the proposed wall along Santa Barbara Boulevard in order to advertise new homes available within the community. The 4 square foot banner sign permitted by the LDC provides minimal visibility and likely will be difficult to read by motorists traveling along Santa Barbara Boulevard, a 45 mph 6 -lane roadway. Additionally, the applicant is requesting that the banner be allowed for up to 90 days per calendar year to allow display throughout the peak winter season for home sales. Due to the property's location on a busy road and high travel speeds along the roadway. The Applicant is seeking an increase to the allowable banner size to ensure visibility of this new community. The requested banner size is in accordance with deviations approved for similar residential projects throughout the County. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable as the applicant has proposed an end date of December 2024 for the proposed deviation. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5.a, which requires on -premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from edge of roadway paved surface or back of curb, to allow a setback of 5' from edge of roadway paved surface or back of curb. This deviation excludes public roads. Petitioner's Justification: This deviation will provide locational flexibility for directional signage internal to the RPUD. A unified design theme will be utilized for all signage throughout the community, thereby ensuring a cohesive appearance and increased aesthetic appeal. All directional signage will meet the Clear Sight Distance PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 14 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 753 9.B.a requirements in accordance with LDC Section 60.06.05. Furthermore, this deviation is typical of many of the master planned developments throughout Collier County. All roads and drives will be privately owned and maintained. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable as the signs will meet applicable LDC standards and the roads are private. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C. La and 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, Excluding Sound Walls, which requires fences or walls in a residential PUD to be 6 feet or less in height, to permit an 8 -foot high wall on top of berm along Cope Lane right-of-way and 12 foot high wall on top of the required water management berm along the Santa Barbara Boulevard right-of-way. Petitioner's Justification: The additional wall height is necessary to provide a buffer from the adjacent 6 -lane traffic noise, and the ground must be altered to meet water management criteria. The wall height is consistent with the wall height constructed for Falling Waters west of Santa Barbara Boulevard due to noise concerns associated with the 6-laning of Santa Barbara Boulevard. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6 (a) and 5.06.02.B.6 (b), On -premises Sign Within Residential Districts, which permits two ground signs at a maximum height of 8 feet with a sign face area not to exceed 64 square feet and a minimum setback from all property lines and road right-of-way of 10 feet, to permit two signs, not at the project entrance, of up to 80 square feet (per sign face) to be located along the Santa Barbara Boulevard frontage of the property on the project's wall and to exceed the maximum sign height of 8 feet for a maximum of 12 feet in height measured from the adjacent roadway centerline elevation with a minimum setback of zero feet from the property line. This Deviation is conditioned upon owner's relocation of the wall and sign at its own expense, in the event it conflicts with a county road expansion or project. Petitioner's Justification: The project access will be located on Cope Lane and not Santa Barbara Boulevard. Cope Lane is not a through street and project signage is not visible at the project entrance for motorists traveling on Santa Barbara Boulevard, the arterial roadway located along the project's western boundary. Providing signage on Santa Barbara Boulevard will meet the intent of the Collier County Sign Code by lessening hazards to pedestrians and motorists by providing project identification signs in a visible location along the project's frontage to aid residents and guests in identifying the project. Santa Barbara Boulevard is a 6 -lane arterial roadway with high travel speeds. Having the additional signage square footage is essential for visibility and readability for motorists. The height of the signage will be consistent with the proposed wall height on which it is proposed to be located. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable based on the 6 - lane arterial roadway. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2, Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires dual sidewalks on local roads internal to the site, to allow a sidewalk on one side of the roadway where the property is permitted with single loaded home sites. Appropriate crosswalks shall be provided at crossing locations. PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 15 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 754 9.B.a Petitioner's Justification: A portion of the PUD will be developed with homes located on only one side of the internal street. This internal street segment is approximately 255 feet in length. No residents would have direct access to a sidewalk in this location; therefore, eliminating the need for a sidewalk in this location of the PUD. Appropriate crossroads will be provided to provide safe street crosswalks at each street crossing. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable based on a single loaded street. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5, Preservation Standards, which requires preservation areas shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off-site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to allow the onsite preserves to be non-contiguous. Petitioner's Justification: The proposed project site is composed of several parcels, which have been previously impacted by residential and agricultural uses. The highest quality remaining native habitats are not contiguous on the project site and are actually located at opposite sides of the site. One area is a small wetland on the western boundary of the site that was left in place during the construction of Santa Barbara Blvd, and the other proposed preserve area is a wetland on the east side of the site that will remain contiguous with the platted preserves adjacent to the property. Both of these wetland areas are jurisdictional to the Corps of Engineers and are being preserved to meet the avoidance and minimization criteria of the Corps and the SFWMD. Both areas meet the hierarchal criteria of the Collier County LDC 3.05.07.A.4 and will provide greater assurances of viable habitat areas as opposed to trying to restore agricultural pasture or residential areas around the wetland to meet the County required acreage. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable based on the quality of remaining native habitats. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.08.B.2.a.i and 5.05.08.B.2.c.i, Architectural and Site Design Standards, which requires where a proposed project site located within 150 to 300 feet of an arterial or collector road, including all rights-of-way, shall be required to comply with LDC sections 5.05.08 DA., D.10., D.13., D.15., E, and F. Compliance shall be limited to the building fagades facing the arterial or collector road to allow the buildings behind a wall to not be subject to this LDC requirement. Petitioner's Justification: This Section of the LDC would be applicable to a building located in the amenity area of the project. It is the intent of the developer to install solid walls on their Santa Barbara Boulevard and Cope Lane property boundaries. The wall along Santa Barbara Boulevard will be 12 feet in height, making the amenity building largely impossible for the public to see. Requiring additional architectural embellishments for the amenity building is unnecessary. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation appears reasonable, but the deviation request presumes that the 230 families within the proposed Russell Square PUD would not benefit from PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 16 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 755 9.B.a architectural embellishments required in the LDC. The amenity area of the proposed PUD may be the best location for architectural embellishments for the future residents of the neighborhood. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Parking Space Requirements, which requires where small-scale recreation facilities are accessory to a single-family or multifamily project and intended only for the residents of that project, exclusive of golf courses/clubhouses, the recreation facilities may be computed at 50 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are not within 300 feet of the recreation facilities and at 25 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities, to allow the parking space for the recreation facilities to be computed at 25 percent where the majority of dwelling units are within 500 feet of the recreation facilities. Petitioner's Justification: The project will have sidewalks throughout allowing residents the ability to walk to the project amenity area. Parking on-site will be provided. It has been this developer's experience that the proposed reduction in required parking provides ample on-site parking for residents and guests and that the LDC requirement results in excess parking for the on-site amenity area. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation appears reasonable, but the deviation request presumes there will be ample parking for the amenity area. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, Table 2.4, Buffer Requirements, which requires a 15' wide type `B" landscape buffer to allow no buffer in the areas adjacent to the Taormina Reserve PUD preserve area as depicted on the Master Plan. Petitioner's Justification: This deviation is justified due to the location of the proposed Russell Square preserve area and its adjacency to the preserve areas located within the Taormina Reserve PUD. Providing a landscape buffer either between the preserve areas, or adjacent to the preserve on the Russell Square property provides no benefit to either PUD. the nearest single-family development tract in Taormina Reserve is over 800 feet away with preserve areas located between the Russell Square multi family tract and the single-family tract in Taormina Reserve. Please see attached exhibit identifying the distances between the Russell Square RPUD and Taormina Reserve development tracts. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The deviation is reasonable and justifiable. The Landscape Division further states that given the extent of the preserve in the abutting PUD, staff supports this deviation. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on May 10, 2018, 5:30 PM, at the Shepard of the Glades Lutheran Church 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Naples, FL. For further information, please see the NIM Summary information in the backup material. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 17 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 756 9.B.a County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Specifically, a deviation is being requested to allow the preserves to be non-contiguous as shown in the Master Plan. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on August 28, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Division staff recommends the CCPC forward petition PUDZ-PL20170004414 Russell Square to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval with the following condition: 1. The Master Plan shall be revised to show an interconnection north to the Taormina Reserve PUD. A developer commitment will be added to the PUD Document that requires the interconnection to be included as part of the first SDP or Plat or ROW permit approval and constructed before the first CO of any residential units. Attachments: A) Proposed RPUD Ordinance, Russell Square B) Proposed Master Plan, Russell Square C) FLUE Consistency Review PUDZ-PL20170004414; Russell Square Page 18 of 18 Revised: August 20, 2018 Packet Pg. 757 ORDINANCE NO. 18 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A PORTION OF THE REAL PROPERTY IN A ST OVERLAY (SPECIAL TREATMENT) TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 230 MULTI- FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD AND APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE SOUTH OF DAVIS BOULEVARD IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 32.9+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ- PL20170004414] WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. representing developer, Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district with a portion of the real property in a ST overlay to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a 32.9+/- acre project to be known as the Russell Square RPUD to allow up to 230 multi -family dwelling units in accordance with the RPUD Documents, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "F" and incorporated herein by reference. [18 -CPS -01762/1431239/1] 133 Russell Square PUDZ-PL20170004414 8/24/18 1 of 2 9.B.b Packet Pg. 758 The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A — Permitted Uses Exhibit B — Development Standards Exhibit C — Master Plan Exhibit D — Legal Description Exhibit E — List of Deviations Exhibit F — Developer Commitments [18 -CPS -01762/1431239/1] 133 Russell Square PUDZ-PL20170004414 8/24/18 2 of 2 2018 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ANDY SOLIS, Chairman 9.B.b Packet Pg. 759 9.B.b EXHIBIT A FOR RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD Regulations for development of the Russell Square RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Document and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 230 multi -family residential dwelling unit types shall be permitted within the RPUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Multi -family dwelling units B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the principal uses permitted in this RPUD, including but not limited to garages, carports, swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures and utility buildings. 2. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 3. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner. AMENITY AREA A. Principal Uses: 1. Clubhouse with cafes, snack bars and similar uses intended to serve residents and guests. 2. Community administrative and recreation facilities. Outdoor/indoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis/pickle ball courts and basketball courts, fitness/spa, parks, playgrounds, pedestrian/bikeways, dog parks and passive and/or active water features intended to serve residents and guests. Russell Square RPUD, PL20170004414 Page 1 of 12 08/20/2018 Packet Pg. 760 9.B.b 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, landscape nurseries, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters to serve residents and their guests. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 2. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner. PRESERVE A. Allowable Uses: 1. Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve area to be retained. 2. Preservation. 3. Passive uses, as per LDC requirements. 4. Water management as allowed by the LDC. 5. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves. B. Any other use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner. Russell Square RPUD, PL20170004414 Page 2 of 12 08/20/2018 Packet Pg. 761 9.B.b EXHIBIT B FOR RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Russell Square RPUD Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. Guardhouses, gatehouses, access control structures, clock towers, fences, walls, columns, decorative hardscaping or architectural embellishments associated with the project's entrance features are permitted within the "R" and "A" designated areas abutting the project's entrance, or within the private roadway as depicted on the PUD Master Plan, and shall have no required setbacks; however, such structures cannot be located where they create vehicular stacking or sight distance issues for motorists and pedestrians, and cannot exceed 35 feet in zoned height and 40 feet in actual height. Russell Square RPUD, PL20170004414 Page 3 of 12 08/20/2018 Packet Pg. 762 SP_ -- - -- LBT — Landscape Buffer Tract LMT —Lake Maintenance Tract (1) Front setback is measured from back of curb, or edge of pavement if not curbed, for private roads. The minimum 15 -foot front setback may be reduced to 10 feet where the unit has a recessed or side -entry garage. Front -loading garages shall be setback a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk for private roads. (2) No structures may be located within the county drainage easement shown on the master plan. Note: Nothing in this RPUD document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. STANDARDS Minimum Floor Area (per unit) Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth Maximum Height Zoned Actual SETBACKS Minimum Front Yard Minimum Side Yard Minimum Rear Yard (2) Minimum Preserve Minimum Distance Between Principal Structures errGccnev croi irri ine EXHIBIT B FOR RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MULTI -FAMILY 1,000 S.F. N/A N/A N/A 35 feet 45 feet 15 feet (1) 10 feet 10 feet from Perimeter Buffer or 0 feet from LMT 25 feet 20 feet AMENITY AREA N/A 10,000 N/A N/A 35 feet 45 feet 15 feet 10 feet 10 feet from Perimeter Buffer or 0 feet from LMT 25 feet 10 feet Maximum Height Zoned 35 feet 35 feet Actual 40 feet 40 feet SETBACKS' Minimum Front Yard SPS SPS Minimum Side Yard SPS SPS Minimum Rear Yard 0 feet from Perimeter Buffer or LMT 0 feet from Perimeter Buffer or LMT Minimum Preserve 10 feet 10 feet S—Cmea x Prinrin�l f+.. +.. 9.B.b m L C0 m N to 7 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N D a 00 co m Russell Square RPUD, PL20170004414 Page 4 of 12 08/20/2018 Packet Pg. 763 9.B.b TAORMINA RESERVE MPUD I COMMERCIAL N 15' WIDE TYPE'B' 4 —.----.----._— LANDSCAPEBUFFER o 100, 201 m , SCALE: 1" = 200' WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" TAORMINA RESERVE MPUD PRESERVE F31. PUD BOUNDARY 20' WIDE NO BUFFER RE _ _E REQUIRED TYPE 'D' _ ��11 Z D LANDSCAPE I l II ..=. =. . a / tom_ pl 0 BUFFER \o WATER , NAGEMEN Z • PRESERVE WATER, I n m Afv GEM,: >; M�r�f (n m C, m J/z/ < ;om. R 15'WIDETYPE'B' 0I C Q 3 LANDSCAPE BUFFER AA ON—,_ 0 RE$E R�%E ` E Ao® PROJECT ENTRANCE 1 R PROJECT ENTRANCER 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' i SIGN LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' WIDE TYPED' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONED:A COUNTY WATER MANAGEMENT AREA ® GradyMinor V Grady Nb1ur and AaauclatI P. R\. ;1111X) Via IMI A'CY 6DIIIta $yringx, Florida 31131 Civil Engineers Land Surveyors . Planners Landscape Architects Cerl.. of Au i, fie W05151 Cert. of A.M La 0005151 Buslnese LC 2DOD0299 Bonita Si,ftw 239.947.1144 —w. Gr,rQvMinnr. cn port M3'— 239.690.4380 —'-- -- -- —.J ZONED:A RESIDENTIAL ® = DEVIATION A = AMENITY AREA R =RESIDENTIAL AREA RUSSELL SQUARE RP UD sDALE D REVISED JOB CODE. wcserE EXHIBIT C 08/17/2018 Dere: FES - MASTER PLAN ME weue: — owercu Packet Pg. 764 9.B.b SITE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE AREA: 32.9± ACRE MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS: 230 (7 DU/AC X 32.9 ACRES) PRESERVE: REQUIRED PROVIDED NATIVE TREES: REQUIRED: PROVIDED: OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: PROVIDED: NOTES 3.47± ACRES (13.88± ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.25) 3.47± ACRES 28 (110 EXISTING TREES X 0.25) 25 PINES + 3 PALMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07 19.74± ACRES (32.9± ACRES X.60) 19.74± ACRES 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTIONS 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TYPE B BUFFER, A MINIMUM 6 -FOOT -WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE PRESERVE WILL BE CONVEYED BY OWNER TO A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION OR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION AT TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL. OWNER WILL PLANT ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IN THE BUFFER EASEMENT TO ACHIEVE THE OPACITY REQUIREMENT NO LATER THAN ONE YEAR FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. Edd M dN A0...1)"r.. radyMinor 3800 NU no. BCY RumtB Sp^lake, ElurlJa 31131 ClviIEngineers Land Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects Csrt..f Auth. EB -5151 C rt oMld, LB 01p5151 Business Lf, 28000268 Bonita Syringe: 239.947.1144 wN 1v. l; rei/rMinm•. cnm FoM1 MVere: 239,690.4380 RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD REVISED 08/20/2018 5CA1� LL .as., C EXHIBIT C [ MASTER PLAN NOTES JOB CODE: NLSeP DATE W EBRUAFvzo,B FILE N"E: K.HE IXHer c wSpt gRaW SHEET 2 OF 2 Packet Pg. 765 9.B.b EXHIBIT D FOR RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THE SOUTH ONE-HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESERVING THEREFROM THE EAST THIRTY (30) FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES ONLY. PARCEL B: THE NORTH ONE-HALF (1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESERVING THEREFROM THE EAST THIRTY (30) FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES ONLY; ALSO KNOWN AS TRACT 40 OF UNRECORDED PLAT. PARCEL C: THE SOUTH ONE-HALF (1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS 30 FEET FOR EASEMENT ON THE SOUTH LINE AND 30 FEET FOR EASEMENT ON THE EAST LINE FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES ONLY. ALSO KNOWN AS TRACT 39, ENCHANTED ACRES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL D: THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESERVING THEREFROM THE EAST 30 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY; ALSO DESCRIBED AS TRACT 42, ENCHANTED ACRES. AND ALSO LESS THAT PORTION OF SAID PARCELS A, B, C AND D, TAKEN BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDING BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND C&T PROPERTIES UNLIMITED AS EVIDENCED BY ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED MARCH 10, 2008 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4337, PAGE 541, CASE NUMBER 07 -4923 -CA REFERENCED TO AS PARCEL 126FEE AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHWEST AND NORTHWEST QUARTERS OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9; THENCE SOUTH 00°50'29" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9 A DISTANCE OF 653.41 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COPE LANE; THENCE SOUTH 89°57'32" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 38.83 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH 07°21'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 207.06 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3,100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°20'02" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 450.91 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9; THENCE NORTH 00°58'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 685.18 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. 3283, PAGE 524, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 89°39'02" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 100.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9; THENCE SOUTH 00°58'38" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 686.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. Russell Square RPUD, PL20170004414 Page 7 of 12 08/20/2018 Packet Pg. 766 9.B.b PARCEL E: THE SOUTH ONE-HALF (S 1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (NE 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST THIRTY (30') FEET THEREOF, TO BE USED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES ONLY (TRACT 50 OF UNRECORDED PLAT) PARCEL F: THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS ROAD EASEMENTS ON THE WEST SIDE OF 30 -FOOT PARCEL ALSO KNOWN AS TRACT 49 ENCHANTED ACRES. PARCEL G: SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 48 OF ENCHANTING ACRES. PARCEL H: (1) THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; (2) THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; (3) THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY DEEDS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1091, PAGES 1110 AND 1119, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; (4) THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; (5) THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND (6) THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 32.89 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Russell Square RPUD, PL20170004414 Page 8 of 12 08/20/2018 Packet Pg. 767 9.B.b EXHIBIT E FOR RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD LIST OF DEVIATIONS 1. Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height, to allow a temporary banner sign up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and 8 feet in height. The temporary banner sign shall be limited to a maximum of 90 days during season defined as November 1 to April 30 per calendar year. This Deviation will remain valid until 90% of the units are sold or until December 31, 2024, whichever comes first. At such time, the Deviation will be void. 2. Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5.a, which requires on -premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from edge of roadway, paved surface or back of curb, to allow a setback of 5' from edge of roadway, paved surface or back of curb. This deviation excludes public roads. 3. Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.1.a and 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, Excluding Sound Walls, which requires fences or walls in a residential PUD to be 6 feet or less in height, to permit an 8 -foot high wall on top of berm along Cope Lane right-of-way and 12 foot high wall on top of the required water management berm along the Santa Barbara boulevard right-of-way. 4. Deviation 4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6 (a) and 5.06.02.6.6 (b), On -premises Sign Within Residential Districts, which permits two ground signs at a maximum height of 8 feet with a sign face area not to exceed 64 square feet and a minimum setback from all property lines and road right-of-way of 10 feet, to permit two signs, not at the project entrance, of up to 80 square feet (per sign face) to be located along the Santa Barbara Boulevard frontage of the property on the project's wall and to exceed the maximum sign height of 8 feet for a maximum of 12 feet in height measured from the adjacent roadway centerline elevation with a minimum setback of zero feet from the property line. This Deviation is conditioned upon owner's relocation of the wall and sign at its own expense, in the event it conflicts with a County road expansion or project. 5. Deviation 5 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2, Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires dual sidewalks on local roads internal to the site, to allow a sidewalk on one side of the roadway where the property is permitted with single loaded home sites. Appropriate crosswalks shall be provided at crossing locations. 6. Deviation 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5, Preservation Standards, which requires preservation areas shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off-site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to allow the onsite preserves to be non-contiguous. 7. Deviation 7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.08.B.2.a.i and 5.05.08.B.2.c.i, Architectural and Site Design Standards, which requires where a proposed project site located within 150 to 300 feet of an arterial or collector road , including all rights-of-way, shall be required to comply with LDC sections 5.05.08 D.4., D.10., D.13., D.15., E, and F. Compliance shall be limited to the building Russell Square RPUD, PL20170004414 Page 9 of 12 08/20/2018 Packet Pg. 768 9.B.b fagades facing the arterial or collector road to allow the buildings behind a wall to not be subject to this LDC requirement. 8. Deviation 8 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Parking Space Requirements, which requires where small-scale recreation facilities are accessory to a single-family or multifamily project and intended only for the residents of that project, exclusive of golf courses/clubhouses, the recreation facilities may be computed at 50 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are not within 300 feet of the recreation facilities and at 25 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities, to allow the parking space for the recreation facilities to be computed at 25 percent where the majority of dwelling units are within 500 feet of the recreation facilities. 9. Deviation 9 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, Table 2.4, Buffer Requirements, which requires a 15' wide type "B" landscape buffer to allow no buffer in the areas adjacent to the Taormina Reserve PUD preserve area as depicted on the Master Plan. Russell Square RPUD, PL20170004414 Page 10 of 12 08/20/2018 Packet Pg. 769 1. 2 3. EXHIBIT F FOR RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC, 5800 Lakewood Ranch Blvd. N., Sarasota, FL 34240. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. MISCELLANEOUS a. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. b. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development ENVIRONMENTAL a. The RPUD shall be required to preserve 25% of native vegetation. 13.88± acres of native vegetation exists on-site requiring a minimum preservation of 3.47± acres (13.88 x.25 = 3.47) of native vegetation to be retained. b. In addition to item 3.a. above, the RPUD shall be required to preserve 25% of native trees, which have grown up in the pasture and central single-family residential area. 110 trees (101 slash pine >8" dbh and 9 cabbage palm >8' clear trunk) exist in densities greater than 8 trees/acre requiring a minimum preservation of 28 trees (110 x .25 = 27.50). Developer shall be permitted to replace these trees and the replacement trees will be placed into areas allowing for 40 -foot diameter canopy for the pines and 10 -foot diameter canopy for the palms in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07. 9.B.b Russell Square RPUD, PL20170004414 Page 1 1 of 12 08/20/2018 Packet Pg. 770 4. 5. Q TRANSPORTATION a. The PUD shall be limited to a maximum of 124 p.m. peak hour two-way trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. b. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for residential dwelling units, the developer or successor shall extend Cope Lane east to the intersection with Sunset Boulevard. This roadway extension shall be constructed to County standards with sidewalks on both sides of the street. C. Owner or its successors shall pay its proportionate fair share for a traffic signal at the intersection of Cope Lane and Santa Barbara Boulevard, if warranted and constructed. LANDSCAPING a. In order to avoid conflicts with utilities and sidewalks, the required canopy tree for an individual lot shall be one from the following list: Wax Myrtle Green Buttonwood Satin Leaf Simpson Stopper (Myrcianthes fragrans) 2:1 Dahoon Holly 2:1 or any other small native tree approved by the County's Landscape Architect Where it can be demonstrated that another tree species can be planted without conflict, staff may approve this alternative species. b. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. In order to provide the required Type B buffer, a minimum 6 -foot -wide landscape buffer easement located outside of the preserve will be conveyed by owner to a homeowner's association or condominium association at time of SDP or plat approval. Owner will plant additional landscape material in the buffer easement to achieve the opacity requirement no later than one year from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy. UTILITIES The owner will construct a Collier County 8" water main through the PUD property and connect to one existing offsite County water main. If water service is connected to Collier County on the north end of the property then a south connection will be stubbed for Collier County future use. If water service is connected to Collier County on the south end of the property then a north connection will be stubbed for Collier County future use. 9.B.b Russell Square RPUD, PL20170004414 Page 12 of 12 08/20/2018 Packet Pg. 771 9.B.c I�,,^--L--- TAORMINA RESERVE MPUD COMMERCIAL 15' WIDETYPE'B' - ^ - - - - - -LANDSCAPE BUFFER 011" -�� I !• 11 11 I TAORMINA RESERVE MPUD p - PRESERVE SCALE: 1" = 21 WHEN PLOrfE] Q BS X 11- ❑3 I I PUD BOUNDARY I I 20' WIDE f L N0-M-fFFER RIR EQUED l oo _ : • - TYPE'D' LANDSCAPE I BUFFER 111 I ,-,-----,•,•P.. ...... M, I V M,m m p0-52f ACRE NATIVE 15' WIDE TYPE 'B- 3 TREE PRESERVATION LANDSCAPE BUFFER 3 it AREA RM ERVE S. �r e7 0 ❑3 I PROJECT-) II< ENTRANCE 5 rn N LA �y mm zm �I > > -------f I � II l I 15' WIDETYPE'B'�I PROJECT ENTRANCE R SIGN LANDSCAPE I 20' WIDETYPE'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONED: A COUNTY WATER MANAGEMENT AREA �GradyMinor ��mo iia uei ¢er tw��itr R4to�, ru�rey z tt 9 t c Csi �Rn�s^^era [.md Slm'r,,R¢s` PI®era Laudac�Pc p�tuCx 8—Amex 22,HaA Id! wrw. CreerNta er.aom Frtmm- T39.699.jw- BUFFER - -- - -- -. - - -- ZONED: A JZONED:A RESIDENTIAL A = DEVIATION A =AMENITY AREA I R = RESIDENTIAL AREA RUSSELL SgUARE RFUD I' ,, REVISED EXHIBIT C 07/09/2018 MASTER PLAN mer ct oe 2 Packet Pg. 772 9.B.d �i0�7'' �U7ilHty Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner Zoning Services Section, Zoning Division From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division Date: June 20, 2018 Subject: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ — PL20170004414 - REV 2 PETITION NAME: Russell Square RPUD Rezone REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting to rezone approximately ±32.9 -acres from "A," Agriculture (ST Overlay) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District to allow for a maximum of 230 residential dwelling units. The petitioner is also requesting deviations for sidewalks on one side of road only where homes are located on only one side of the road; to increase the size of temporary signs; reduce setbacks on directional signs; to allow higher fences and walls; deviate from preservation standards so that they are not contiguous within the development; and to increase the maximum height of entrance signage; to comply with the LDC architectural and site design standards only when facing an arterial or collector roadway, but not buildings within the walls of a development; reduce required parking for recreation facilities by 25%. Submittal 2 revised the FLUCCS map and Native Habitat map, bio info on the Senior Ecologist, revised Evaluation criteria, and water and sewer facilities will be extended to site and shown on revised Statement of Utility Provisions. Submittal 2 also modified the Master Plan to show the Cope Lane extension to Sunset Blvd, and to add a new Transportation Commitment to the PUD, in regards to the construction of Cope Lane. LOCATION: The subject site is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Blvd. approximately 2,000 feet south of Davis Blvd. (SR84), adjacent to the southern boundary of Taormina Reserve Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Urban n Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, and it's within a Residential Density Band (Mixed -Use Activity ti Center #6) on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). z Policy 5.3 in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) states, in part, "All rezonings must be consistent with this Q Growth Management Plan." Staff reviewed the proposed land use for consistency with the FLUE. The FLUE states, "Urban designated areas will accommodate... (a) Residential uses including single family, multi -family, duplex, and mobile home. The maximum densities allowed are identified in the Districts, Subdistricts, and Overlays..." Abase density of 4 residential dwelling units per gross acre maybe allowed in the Urban Designated `. Area, though this is not an entitlement. This base level of density may be adjusted as determined through the Density a Rating System depending upon the location and characteristics of the project. Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 773 9.B.d As stated in the Future Land Use Element, "The purpose of the Urban Residential Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. The Density Rating System states, "(b). Proximity to Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center: If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be added. The density band around a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map." Because this project site is located within one mile of Activity Center #6 at the intersection of Davis Blvd. (SR84) and Santa Barbara Blvd., it is eligible for the Residential Density Band Bonus. The FLUE also states, "The final determination of permitted density via implementation of this Density Rating System is made by the Board of County Commissioners through an advertised public hearing process (rezone or Stewardship Receiving Area designation)." This project is eligible for a base density of 4 residential dwelling units per acre and is eligible for a density bonus of 3 additional dwelling units per acre for being located within the Residential Density Band for Activity Center #6 — for a total eligibility of 7 DU/A (4 DU/A base + 3 DU/A density band bonus = 7 DU/A). The maximum number of dwelling units allowable is 230 dwelling units (32.9 acres * 7.00 DU/A = 230.3 dwelling units rounded to 230.) The petitioner's request for 230 dwelling units is consistent with the FLUE. Select FLUE Policies are shown below (in italics), followed by staff analysis in [bracketed bold text]. FLUE Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety.] Objective 7 of the FLUE states: "Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the County, where applicable, and as follows: " Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [Exhibit "C-1", Master Plan, shows one ingress/egress point on Santa Barbara Blvd., a major collector as identified in the Transportation Element of the GMP.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Exhibit "C-1", Master D Plan, shows a looping road within the project with one north -south road extending the large loop off the U_ ingress/egress roadway (Cope Lane) that ties into Santa Barbara Blvd. Therefore, all lots or tracts will have ti internal access.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or a interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. E [Exhibit "C-1", Master Plan, shows no interconnections with adjoining neighborhoods or developments; the o developer is proposing 8 — 12 -foot walls surrounding the entire residential planned unit development. The a approved Master Plan for Taormina Reserve MPUD (development directly north of the subject site) indicates a `potential' vehicular and pedestrian interconnection to the south via the extension of Sunset Blvd. Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 774 9.B.d The Taormina Reserve MPUD developer agreed to design and permit the Sunset Blvd. road extension within 5 years of the approval of the MPUD (Sept. 29, 2009). Although that time period has expired, and staff recommended (with their first review) having Russell Square RPUD developer coordinate with the Taormina Reserve MPUD developer to provide an interconnection between the two PUDs; staff can see where this might not be feasible due to Sunset Blvd. being a private easement and is to be vacated. The subject petitioner in their response letter dated May 29, 2018, stated that it is no longer feasible to have an interconnection to the north for this reason. Staff will support Collier County Transportation Planning's direction concerning this matter. Interconnections to the east and south are not feasible at this time with single family residences in Agricultural zoning. To the west is Santa Barbara Blvd.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [Exhibit "A" Permitted Uses list only multi -family dwelling units as permitted housing types for this RPUD. A clubhouse is itemized as an accessory use in the Amenity Area, which is sometimes used for civic uses, e.g. polling place. Exhibit "C-1" Master Plan indicates that the required acreage of open space will be provided for this project; and several allowable common open space uses and structures to serve residents and their guests are itemized in Exhibit "A," including outdoor/indoor recreation facilities and passive recreational features. Comprehensive Planning Staff and Collier County Transportation Planning Staff support the petitioner's request for a sidewalk deviation to only provide sidewalks on one side of the roadway where the property is permitted with single loaded sites.] Review of PUD Documents Evaluation Criteria Several Growth Management Plan references are incorrect and should be modified: • Page 2, FLUE Policy 5.3 is Policy 5.5 • Page 2, FLUE Policy 5.4 is Policy 5.6 • Page 2, FLUE Policy 5.5 is Policy 5.7 • Page 3 and 6, Transportation Element Policy 5.1 wording in response differs from Element, it is not an impact on the County's AUIR, but "affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR..." • Page 5, FLUE Policy 5.3 is Policy 5.5 • Page 5, FLUE Policy 5.5 is Policy 5.7 CONCLUSION Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed Planned Unit Development Rezone may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). PETITION ON CITYVIEW v z cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division +� David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Q Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section PUDZ-PL20170004414 Russell Square R2.docx z v ca Q Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 775 9.B.e Russell Square RPUD (PL20170004414) Application and Supporting Documents September 6, 2018 CCPC Hearing m Prepared August 14, 2018 © GradyM[nor CMI 6nglnccrs • Land Surveyors • Planners • I andscape Arrhaccts Packet Pg. 776 GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects March 5, 2018 Mr. James Sabo, AICP Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, Russell Square RPUD Rezone — PL20170004414, Submittal 1 Dear Mr. Sabo: A Collier County application for Public Hearing for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezone for properties located in the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately % mile south of Davis Boulevard is being filed electronically for review. This application proposes to rezone 32.9± acres from the A, Agricultural (ST Overlay) Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit Development Zoning District to allow a maximum of 230 residential dwelling units. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone 3. Property Owner List 4. Legal Description 5. Evaluation Criteria 6. Utility Dedication Statement 7. Pre -application meeting notes 8. Affidavit of Authorization 9. Property Ownership Disclosure Form 10. Covenant of Unified Control 11. Completed Addressing Checklist 12. Warranty Deed(s) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 9.B.e Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 www.gradyminor.com Packet Pg. 777 Mr. James Sabo, AICP RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, Russell Square RPUD Rezone — PL20170004414 March 5, 2018 Page 2 of 2 13. Boundary Survey 14. Aerial Location Map 15. Environmental Data Requirements 16. Traffic Impact Study 17. Waiver of Historical Survey 18. School Impact Analysis Application 19. PUD Exhibits A -F 20. Deviation Justifications Please feel free to contact Rich Yovanovich at 435-3535 or me should you have any questions. a Sincerely, N � m N D. Wayne Arnold, AICP r v 0 0 0 ti c: Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC N Richard D. Yovanovich J a GradyMinor File N 0 a r Q Packet Pg. 778 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑■ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A. -F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A. -F. Name of Property Owner( Address: Telephone: E -Mail Address: APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Please see "Property Owner List" document Cell: City: State: ZIP: Fax: Name of Applicant/Agent: Please see "Applicant / Agent Information" document Firm: Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC (Applicant) Address: 5800 Lakewood Ranch Blvd. N. City: Sarasota State: FL ZIP: 34240 Telephone: 239-221-0446 Cell: E -Mail Address: )schier@nealcommunities.com Fax: Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. Updated 2/01/2018 Page 1 of 11 Packet Pg. 779 9.B.e Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 'F7nNF RF(111FCT This application is requesting a rezone from: A, Agricultural Zoning district(s) to the Residential Planned Unit Development zoning district(s) Present Use of the Property: Undeveloped and Single family residences Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Residential dwelling units Original PUD Name: Not applicable Ordinance No.: Not applicable PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range:0�50 /26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page # Size of Property: Please see "Legal Description" document Property I.D. Number: ft. x ft. = Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Please see "Property Owner List" document Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 32.9+/ - East side of Santa Barbara Blvd., approximately 2,000 feet south of Davis Blvd. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): ❑ Commercial ❑■ Residential ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: Updated 2/01/2018 ❑ Industrial Page 2 of 11 Packet Pg. 780 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: N/A Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: _ _ City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: _ City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: 9.B.e Updated 2/01/2018 Page 3 of 11 Packet Pg. 781 Zoning Land Use N Taormina MPUD Undeveloped Residential and Commercial S A (Agricultural) Residential E Taormina MPUD and A (Agricultural) Residential W E (Estates) and Falling Waters PUD Residential If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: N/A Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: _ _ City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: _ City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: 9.B.e Updated 2/01/2018 Page 3 of 11 Packet Pg. 781 9.B.e Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Updated 2/01/2018 Page 4 of 11 Packet Pg. 782 9.B.e Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? Not applicable Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. r ECtJ cuiivk3 Ur utvtwPER LUiviivn i MUM FS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. Updated 2/01/2018 Page 5 of 11 r Q Packet Pg. 783 9.B.e Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC Address: 5800 Lakewood Ranch Blvd Telephone: 239-221-0446 Cell: City: Sarasota State: FL E -Mail Address: danc@nealcommunities.com Address of Subject Property (If available): City: State: ZIP: PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 09 50 26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: Fax: Please see "Legal Description" document ZIP: 34240 Property I.D. Number: Please see "Property Owner List" document TYPE OF SEWHvt uibPOSAL i u tst PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System �❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Package Treatment Plant ❑1 (GPD Capacity): e. Seotic Svstem I i iPE OF WA) �R SERVILr i u ar rROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System d. Private System (Well) ❑✓ ❑I Provide Name: Total Population to be Served: 230 units x 2.5 people = 575 people Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 108,675 GPD Average Daily: 80,500 GPD B. Sewer -Peak: 77,625 GPD Average Daily: 57,500 GPD If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: 8/1/2019 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 6 of 11 Packet Pg. 784 9.B.e Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Not applicable Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Please see "Utility Dedication Statement" document Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at co the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any C provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. m r Q Updated 2/01/2018 Page 7 of 11 Packet Pg. 785 Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for planned unit development ( PUD) zoning. We hereby designate , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Owner Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this who is personally known to me or has produced Updated 2/01/2018 Printed Name day of , 201_ by as identification. Notary Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) Page 8 of 11 CL U M m r c m E t U R r r Q Packet Pg. 786 9.B.e Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑■ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 2S2-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at INSERT LINK. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 �❑✓ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑✓ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ✓ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ ✓ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1✓❑ 10 Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑✓ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 ✓ ❑ Historical Survey 1 EEl School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑✓ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ✓ ❑ Completed Exhibits A -F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ✓❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ Checklist continues on next page Updated 2/01/2018 Page 9 of 11 CL U M m r c m E U R r Q Packet Pg. 787 Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 9.B.e Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑Ll ❑ IVI Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ ❑✓ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 MV *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: ❑ Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ❑ Exhibit B: Development Standards ❑ Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code ❑ Exhibit D: Legal Description ❑ Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each ❑ Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑I School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams & David Berra ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION ❑1 Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 FX PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre �4 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 X Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: X Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 Updated 2/01/2018 Page 10 of 11 CL U M m r c m E U a r Q Packet Pg. 788 Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net CX Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 I I School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5" and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee �y May 16, 2018 (L - Signature of Petitione or Agent Date D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed named of signing party Updated 2/01/2018 Page 11 of 11 CL U cc 00 r c m E t U R r r Q Packet Pg. 789 Russell Square RUD (PL20170004414) Applicant / Agent Information Applicant: 9.B.e Name of Applicant: James R. Schier, Vice President Firm: Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC Address: 5800 Lakewood Ranch Blvd. N. City: Sarasota State: FL Zip: 34240 Telephone: 239-221-0446 E -Mail Address: ischier(@nealcommunities.com Agent: Name of Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Firm: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey City: Bonita Springs State: FL Zip: 34134 Telephone: 239-947-1144 E -Mail Address: warnold(@2radvminor.com and Name of Agent: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Firm: Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Address: 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Telephone: 239-947-1144 E -Mail Address: warnold(@Rradvminor.com City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34103 March 24, 2018 Applicant Agent Information-revl.docx © GradyNlinor CWd Engfnrcrs • I,anri Survcynrs • Planners • I,andscapc ATORccts a� L a a� to 7 r O 0 0 r` O N J a N a 00 cc v co a U M m r c a� E U r r Q Page 1 of 1 Packet Pg. 790 Parcel Number 00407520002 00407840009 00407960002 00408200004 00408360009 00407720006 00408120003 Russell Square RPUD (PL20170004414) Property Owner List Owner Cross and Thompson LLC Cross and Thompson LLC Cross and Thompson LLC Cross and Thompson LLC Cross and Thompson LLC John D. Bruce 9.B.e 6820 Daniels Road, Naples, FL 34109 2402 Sunset Blvd, Naples, FL 34112 Robert Tetrault Rev Trust & Kathleen M Tetrault Rev Trust 2380 Sunset Blvd, Naples, FL 34112 January 11, 2018 Property Owner List.docx © GradyMinor Civil 6nglnecrs • Land 8urvcynrs • Planners • I andscape Amh%xts Page 1 of 1 Packet Pg. 791 9.B.e Russell Square RPUD (PL20170004414) Legal Description PARCEL A: THE SOUTH ONE-HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESERVING THEREFROM THE EAST THIRTY (30) FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES ONLY. PARCEL B: THE NORTH ONE-HALF (1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE- QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESERVING THEREFROM THE EAST THIRTY (30) FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT- OF-WAY PURPOSES ONLY; ALSO KNOWN AS TRACT 40 OF UNRECORDED PLAT. PARCEL C: THE SOUTH ONE-HALF (1/2) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE- QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS 30 FEET FOR EASEMENT ON THE SOUTH LINE AND 30 FEET FOR EASEMENT ON THE EAST LINE FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES ONLY. ALSO KNOWN AS TRACT 39, ENCHANTED ACRES, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL D: THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESERVING THEREFROM THE EAST 30 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY; ALSO DESCRIBED AS TRACT 42, ENCHANTED ACRES. AND ALSO LESS THAT PORTION OF SAID PARCELS A, B, C AND D, TAKEN BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDING BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND C&T PROPERTIES UNLIMITED AS EVIDENCED BY ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED MARCH 10, 2008 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4337, PAGE 541, CASE NUMBER 07 -4923 -CA REFERENCED TO AS PARCEL 126FEE AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHWEST AND NORTHWEST QUARTERS OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9; THENCE SOUTH 00°50'29" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9 A DISTANCE OF 653.41 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COPE LANE; THENCE SOUTH 89°57'32" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 38.83 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID February 6, 2018 Page 1 of 3 NCSBPE Legal Description. docx © GradyMinov CWd Englucrs • I,anri Survcynrs • Planners • Landscape rlrcMtccts Packet Pg. 792 9.B.e Russell Square RPUD (PL20170004414) Legal Description NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE NORTH 07°21'18" EAST, AD ISTANCE OF 207.06 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3,100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°20'02" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 450.91 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9; THENCE NORTH 00°58'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 685.18 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. 3283, PAGE 524, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 89°39'02" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 100.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9; THENCE SOUTH 0058'38" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 686.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. PARCEL E: THE SOUTH ONE-HALF (S 1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (NE 1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST ONE- QUARTER (NW 1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESSTHE WESTTHIRTY (30') FEETTHEREOF, TO BE USED FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES ONLY (TRACT 50 OF UNRECORDED PLAT) PARCEL F: THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS ROAD EASEMENTS ON THE WEST SIDE OF 30 -FOOT PARCEL ALSO KNOWN AS TRACT 49 ENCHANTED ACRES. PARCEL G: SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 48 OF ENCHANTING ACRES. PARCEL H: (1) THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; (2) THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; (3) THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY DEEDS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1091, PAGES 1110 AND 1119, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; February 6, 2018 Page 2 of 3 NCSBPE Legal Description. docx © GradyNflnor CWd Englucrs • I,anri Survcynrs • Planners • Landscape rlrcMtccts Packet Pg. 793 9.B.e Russell Square RPUD (PL20170004414) Legal Description (4) THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; (5) THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND (6) THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 32.89 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. February 6, 2018 Page 3 of 3 NCSBPE Legal Description. docx © GradyNflnor CWd Englucrs • I,anri Survcynrs • Planners • Landscape rlrcMtccts Packet Pg. 794 9.B.e RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD (PL20170004414) Evaluation Criteria Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. Ona separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. The Russell Square RPUD is a 32.9± acre property located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, approximately % mile south of Davis Boulevard. The property is Designated Urban Residential, Urban Mixed Use Residential on the Future Land Use Map. The property is currently zoned A, Agricultural (ST Overlay) and the applicant proposes to rezone the property to permit a 230 dwelling unit residential planned Unit Development (RPUD). The application proposes to permit a multi -family residential dwelling unit types. Residential amenities will be provided on-site for the use of residents of the RPUD. Access to the site is from proposed Cope Lane. The property is located within the density band that surrounds Activity Center #6. The location within the density band qualifies the applicant to seek a bonus density of up to 3 dwelling units per acre above the base density of 4 dwelling units per acre for a maximum of 7 dwelling units per acre. The proposed 32.9± acre RPUD proposes a maximum of 230 dwelling units, which represents 7 dwelling units per acre, consistent with the density permissible under the density rating system of the Future Land Use Element. The site is partially vegetated; however, the vegetation is extensively infested with exotic vegetation. Approximately 13.88± acres of native vegetation exists on site. The conceptual master plan for the project identifies 3.47 acres of vegetation to be preserved onsite, which represents 25% of the native vegetation as required by the LDC. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The proposed 32.9± acre residential planned unit development is located in an area, which has been designated for residential development on the County's Future Land Use Map. Other residential, commercial and institutional developments are located nearby making the location desirable for a planned residential community. The site is within the Collier County Water and Sewer District boundaries. Both water and sewer lines will need to be extended to service the PUD. Capacity is available for water and sewer, and there are no anticipated deficiencies in the system. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as July 2, 2018 Page 1 of 9 NCSBPE Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx © GradyMinor CWd Engfnrcrs • I,anri Survcynrs • Planners • Landscape rlrcMtccts Packet Pg. 795 9.B.e RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD (PL20170004414) Evaluation Criteria they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. The property is under unified control via a contract for purchase for the entire 32.9± acre parcel. Upon approval of the proposed rezoning, the land will be acquired with the intent to develop a residential community consistent with the approved PUD. A homeowner association will be established to insure that common community elements such as open space and surface water management will be maintained. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) Future Land Use Element: The 32.9± project is designated Urban Residential, Urban Mixed Use Residential on the Future Land Use Map. The project also lies within the density band surrounding Activity Center #6, which under the density rating system permits a bonus density of up to 3 dwelling units per acre above the base density of 4 dwelling units per acre permitted in the Urban Residential District for a maximum permissible density of 7 dwelling units per acre. The proposed 230 dwelling units represents 7 dwelling units per acre for the 32.9± acre property and is therefore consistent with the Future Land Use Element Density Rating System. a Policy 5.5 of the Future Land Use Element discourages urban sprawl to minimize the cost of public infrastructure necessary to serve new development. The proposed RPUD represents m infill development within our Urban designated area. All necessary infrastructure to serve the project such as roads, water, sewer, schools, and other essential services are located at or near the property. r r Q Policy 5.6 requires new projects to be compatible and complementary to the surrounding land uses. The proposed RPUD proposes multi -family dwelling units, which are similar to other approved and developed PUD's in the surrounding area including Avalon of Naples and County Barn Road RPUD. The property is also adjacent to the undeveloped Taormina Reserve MPUD and Activity Center #6. Policy 5.7 encourages development of land designated for urban intensities before designating other areas for urban intensity. As discussed in the Policy 5.3 analysis, the property is designated for urban intensities and the requested 230 dwelling unit residential project is consistent with this policy. July 2, 2018 Page 2 of 9 NCSBPE Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx © GradLVNIinor C 1 Finginccrs • I anri 8urvcynrs • Planners • Landscape ATV. h[tccts Packet Pg. 796 9.B.e RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD (PL20170004414) Evaluation Criteria Policy 7.1 encourages new development to connect directly to collector and arterial roads. The project will have access to Santa Barbara Boulevard via an extension of Cope Lane. Collier County installed turn -lanes at this location as part of the 6-laning of Santa Barbara Boulevard. Policy 7.3 encourages all projects to provide interconnections to adjoining neighborhoods or developments. Interconnection to adjoining parcels is not feasible for practical for the proposed RPUD. Properties to the north and east are developed with a private k-12 school and church campus. Property to the south is a lake, which is owned by Collier County. No feasible access connections are possible. The applicant met with the former Transportation Director as part of the Due Diligence evaluation of the property. The former Director was directly involved in the specific interconnection condition for the neighboring Taormina Reserve PUD. It was acknowledged that the County failed to obtain timely access rights over our client's property and the PUD commitment expired. It was agreed that there was no need for the interconnection based on the excess capacity on Santa Barbara Boulevard and the presence of sidewalks in the Santa Barbara right-of-way. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Policy 6.1.1 requires that residential and mixed-use projects greater than 25 acres retain 25% of the existing native vegetation on-site. The project contains approximately 13.88± acres of native vegetation, which would require preservation of approximately 3.47 acres of native vegetation on-site. The proposed conceptual master plan identifies areas of retained native vegetation consistent with this policy. Policy 7.1.2 indicates that development should be directed away from areas having listed species and habitat. The subject property has been evaluated by professional biologists and have determined that there are no listed species inhabiting the site. Further analysis will be completed as part of the State Environmental Resource Permit process and as required in this Policy any required management plans will be completed to insure protection of listed species. Transportation Element: Policy 5.1 requires that all projects are evaluated to determine their affect on the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR. This RPUD application includes a comprehensive assessment of the transportation impacts associated with the project. No level of service impacts result from the proposed 230 dwelling unit residential project therefore the project is consistent with Policy 5.1. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. July 2, 2018 Page 3 of 9 NCSBPE Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx © GradVNiinor CWd Engfnrcrs • I,anri Survcynrs • Planners • I,andscapc kch[tccts Packet Pg. 797 9.B.e RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD (PL2O17OOO4414) Evaluation Criteria The proposed residential PUD provides for multi -family dwelling unit types, consistent with those approved and/or developed in nearby communities. Development standards have been established which are appropriate for the site and which will insure that the form of development will be compatible with nearby residential, commercial and institutional development. Project buffers will be provided to insure that the immediate neighboring communities will have appropriate separation and transition between the uses. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The project will provide a minimum of 60% open space consistent with the requirements of the LDC, which will include native vegetation preserve areas, lakes, buffers and recreational areas. The PUD will include an amenity area for community residents and guests. The PUD document includes a variety of recreational amenities that may be provided including swimming pool, outdoor courts, fitness facilities and the like. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The project will not require phasing due to infrastructure availability. Adequate infrastructure is in place at the project site to service the proposed residential community. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion The project has partially developed property on three sides and is bounded by Santa Barbara Boulevard to the west. There are no plans or opportunities to expand beyond the 32.9± acres. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The PUD includes development standards and conditions which will assure compatible and complementary development. Deviations from certain LDC provisions have been requested as part of the application. The deviations will facilitate development of the property in a manner consistent with other communities developed by the applicant and pose no harm to the public. 10.02.08- Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County July 2, 2018 Page 4 of 9 NCSBPE Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx © Gradyklinor C 1 Finginccrs • I anri 8urvcynrs • Planners • Landscape ATV. h[tccts Packet Pg. 798 RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD (PL20170004414) Evaluation Criteria 9.B.e Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Future Land Use Element: The 32.9± project is designated Urban Residential, Urban Mixed Use Residential on the Future Land Use Map. The project also lies within the density band surrounding Activity Center #6, which under the density rating system permits a bonus density of up to 3 dwelling units per acre above the base density of 4 dwelling units per acre permitted in the Urban Residential District for a maximum permissible density of 7 dwelling units per acre (32.9 x 7 = 230.3). The proposed 230 dwelling units represents 7 dwelling units per acre for the 32.9± acre property and is therefore consistent with the Future Land Use Element Density Rating System. Policy 5.5 of the Future Land Use Element discourages urban sprawl to minimize the cost of public infrastructure necessary to serve new development. The proposed RPUD represents infill development within our Urban designated area. All necessary infrastructure to serve the project such as roads, water, sewer, schools, and other essential services are located at or near the property. Policy 5.7 encourages development of land designated for urban intensities before designating other areas for urban intensity. As discussed in the Policy 5.3 analysis, the property is designated for urban intensities and the requested 230 dwelling unit residential project is consistent with this policy. Policy 7.1 encourages new development to connect directly to collector and arterial roads. County Barn Road serves as a collector roadway and the proposed RPUD with access directly to County Barn Road is consistent with this Policy. Policy 7.3 encourages all projects to provide interconnections to adjoining neighborhoods or developments. Interconnection to adjoining parcels is not feasible for the proposed RPUD. To the north is an undeveloped MPUD that provided for a potential interconnection to the subject site; however, the time limits for perfecting the potential interconnection has expired. Further, Collier County did not secure public access rights south of the MPUD. Given the ample capacity of Santa Barbara Boulevard currently existing and anticipated in the future, there is not a necessity to provide interconnection to the north. Property to the south is a right-of- way and lake, which is owned by Collier County. No feasible access connections are possible. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: July 2, 2018 NCSBPE Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx © GradVNIinor CWd Engfnrcrs • I,anri Survcynrs • Planners • I,andscapc ATORccts Page 5 of 9 r Q Packet Pg. 799 9.B.e RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD (PL20170004414) Evaluation Criteria Policy 6.1.1 requires that residential and mixed use projects greater than 25 acres retain 25% of the existing native vegetation on-site. The project contains approximately 13.88± acres of native vegetation, which would require preservation of approximately 3.47 acres of native vegetation on-site. The proposed conceptual master plan identifies areas of retained native vegetation consistent with this policy. Policy 7.1.2 indicates that development should be directed away from areas having listed species and habitat. The subject property has been evaluated by professional biologists and have determined that there are no listed species inhabiting the site. Further analysis will be completed as part of the State Environmental Resource Permit process and as required in this Policy any required management plans will be completed to insure protection of listed species. Transportation Element: Policy 5.1 requires that all projects are evaluated to determine their affect on the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR. This RPUD application includes a comprehensive assessment of the transportation impacts associated with the project. No level of service impacts result from the proposed 230 dwelling unit residential project therefore the project is consistent with Policy 5.1. 2. The existing land use pattern. The subject property is located south of Davis Boulevard. To the west across Santa Barbara Boulevard is the Falling Waters community. That property is zoned RPUD. To the south is a Collier County Government owned property that contains right-of-way and a lake, which is utilized for the Santa Barbara Boulevard Stormwater. The Russell Square RPUD property is within the density band of Activity Center #6, which permits the proposed residential project at a maximum of 7 dwelling units per acre. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Rezoning to the PUD zoning district will not create an isolated district. All properties adjacent to the project are developed. The rezoning to the PUD zoning district is the appropriate district to permit development of the property consistent with the Future Land Use Element. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. July 2, 2018 Page 6 of 9 NCSBPE Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx © GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • landscape Amh%xts Packet Pg. 800 9.B.e RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD (PL20170004414) Evaluation Criteria The boundaries are not illogically drawn and comprise all of the property under the unified control of the applicant. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The property is currently zoned Agricultural, which does not reflect the urban nature of the property and proximity to major collector and arterial roadways and Activity Center designated property. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The PUD document includes development standards to insure that it is compatible with the immediately surrounding properties. The PUD master plan identifies appropriate buffers and open spaces which will further insure that the development of the residential community will have no adverse impacts to the neighborhood. Access to the project is from an extension of Cope Lane, a County owned right-of-way. There is no direct access to Santa Barbara Boulevard. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. A traffic impact analysis has been submitted in support of the proposed residential PUD. That analysis concludes that there are no current or anticipated level of service issues associated with the proposed 230 -unit project. Access will be from Cope Lane and should not create any impacts during construction. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The project will be required to obtain an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) through the South Florida Water Management District. The ERP review evaluates historic surface water flows and controls the off-site discharge of stormwater from the site. The project will have internal water management facilities including lakes to control the drainage for the project. No drainage issues will result from this project. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Given the limitation on building heights, and the limited proximity to any other active land use, there will be no reduction in light or air for adjacent properties. July 2, 2018 Page 7 of 9 NCSBPE Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx © GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • landscape Ambaccts Packet Pg. 801 9.B.e RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD (PL20170004414) Evaluation Criteria 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed residences will be market rate and will not adversely impact property values in the area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Development of the property for residential dwellings will not deter improvement or development of adjacent property. Given the development and ownership pattern surrounding the property, there is limited opportunity for development of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. Rezoning the property to a residential planned development will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner. The subject PUD is consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Collier County Growth management Plan. The public will benefit from payment of impact fees and property taxes resulting from the development of residences on the property. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The existing zoning is A, Agricultural, which permits a maximum density of 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres. This is a non -urban zoning designation. The property is recognized as being highly urbanized due to the proximity to a Mixed Use Activity Center. Retaining the Agricultural zoning designation would result in an underutilization of this infill parcel that has proximity to the collector and arterial roadway network. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed rezoning is in scale with the needs of the neighborhood and Collier County. The applicant is a well-respected residential developer in Southwest Florida and the proposed PUD is of a scale that makes economic sense and is consistent with the long range planning policies of Collier County, including providing bonus density incentives to utilize projects within close proximity to our Mixed Use Activity Centers. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. July 2, 2018 Page 8 of 9 NCSBPE Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx © Gradyl9inor CWd Finglucrs • I,anri Survcynrs • Planners • I,andscapc kchltccts Packet Pg. 802 9.B.e RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD (PL2O17OOO4414) Evaluation Criteria It is not impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for residential development; however, it is difficult to find sites within the urban area that are of sufficient size to permit the proposed number of dwelling units. The applicant is unaware of any available properties that are already zoned PUD that would permit the requested number of dwelling units. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The subject property has been previously developed with two single-family homes and utilized for grazing. The site will need additional fill material in order to bring the site elevations up to required elevations to meet the standards for the South Florida Water Management District. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There are adequate roadways and utilities available at the site. There are no public facilities deficiencies at the present time and none will occur as a result of this project. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The project is consistent with the Growth Management Plan and it is compatible with surrounding development. July 2, 2018 Page 9 of 9 NCSBPE Evaluation Criteria-rev2.docx © GradyNnor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • landscape Ambaccts Packet Pg. 803 9.B.e Russell Square RPUD Collier County Utility Dedication Statement January 11, 2018 The developer agrees to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. The developer also agrees that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. The developer agrees to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. 1 gnature STATE OF 06 9, j COUNTY OF kee- Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this_Zd- _day of J12018 by 17'lle hke t Cffl-een b who is personate known to me or has produced as identification. Lary Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) January 11, 2018 Page 1 of 1 Utility Dedication Statement. docx MGraft-khnor C[NII Enbinvern • larud tiunevors • Planrivrs • Landxraix• IwhIIi-ci.s Packet Pg. 804 9.B.e Coftir County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUD REZONE Date and Time: 1/10/2018 3:00 P.M. Assigned Planner: lames Sabo Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: SB 32 RPUD PL #: 20170004414 00407520002,00407840009,00407950002,00408200004,00408350089 Property ID #:00408120003, 00408120003Current Zoning: griculture (all parcels) Project Address: Applicant: City: State: Zip: Agent Name: Wayne Arnold, Grady Minor & Assoc _ Phone: 239-947-1144 Agent/Firm Address: 3800 Via Del Rey City:Bonita SpringState: FL Zip: 34134 Property Owner: Cross & Thompson LLC (owns 5 of b parcels), Robert Tetrault Trust (owns 1 of 6 parcels) Please provide the following, if applicable: L Total Acreage --47•-19 '3 - I `? ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: 224 iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage. iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: Q V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 1/9/2018 Page 1 1 of 1> Packet Pg. 805 9.B.e Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre -app Note — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. Special note: audio and/or video recordings are required for the NIM and for Planninp, Commission hearings, three thumbdrive copies of the audio or video must be provided for Commissioners to review ahead of the hearing. It should be provided with the backup materials placed on the CCQC agenda based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/9/2018 Page 1 2 of 5 CL M m r c d E z a Packet Pg. 806 Coder Count 9.B.e y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collierjZov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre -app Note — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. Special note: audio and/or video recordings are required for the NIM and for Planning Commission hearings, three thumbdrive copies of the audio or video must be provided for Commissioners to review ahead of the hearing. It should be provided with the backup materials placed on the CCPC agen a F QF -d Ark4S 4o Ad ti A4ijE F in 4o(AL ACre._S For QrQ5ayc CAICu14J'k0Fj Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/9/2018 Page j 2 of S CL M m E a Packet Pg. 807 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliersov-net Meeting Notes 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data_ Updated 1/9/2018 Page 1 3 of 5 CL U M m r c m E U R r r Q Packet Pg. 808 Cofer County 9.B.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes MROWIff -. . z Disclaimer.- Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/9/2018 Page 1 3 of 5 r Q Packet Pg. 809 P()_ Cofter County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliersov.net Meeting Notes 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 COME=. lig.1 u� 'C ' �. �. int 1 �fl tL4KW r I Disclaimer Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 1/9/2018 Page 1 3 of 5 a Packet Pg. 810 9.B.e EnvironmentalgUDZ- UD Checklist (non-RFMU) Project Name; 1. Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G. I. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label- P546 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on-site or mitigated off-site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-13; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H. I .d -e). Preserve Calculation - P547 c M e; co 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width - P603 3 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off-site Iq preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 0 0 0 ti T Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory o structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be a permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. N stern wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross-sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3,05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback —New a 0 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) Listed Species - P522 a 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off-site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm m fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 E z 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) a Master Plan Contents -P626 11. If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION — DISCUSS WITH CAO When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC — see 1-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) {ensure the test states "subject to LDC section related to Allowable uses within County required preserves" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: 1. Nature trails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC requirements. 3. Stormwater only when in accordance with the LDC. Packet Pg. 811 9.B.e PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 12. PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Review cross-sections if provided; they are not required with the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided. is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: a Packet Pg. 812 Environmental Data Checklist Project Name ; 9.B.e �-� The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 1.) Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. C2.) WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. C3 Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. XSDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. 0 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Code entified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. /� C9 Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listec species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listec species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the m co m tx 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N 0 a 00 W m CL M M m r c m E c� a Packet Pg. 813 9.B.e 17 Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if re ue 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 19. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. -, 02 . The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the COME and LDC. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e./ Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed �/ as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 22 PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. i 23 Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? � r D24 PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 25. Additional comments 26. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) m L ca co as 3 ix 0 0 0 ti T 0 N J a N O a 0 co m a M m r c m E a Packet Pg. 814 9.B.e location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. 1 1. dentify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on-site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off-site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on-site, demonstrate that the criteria in /A section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off-site parcel(s) if off-site donation of land is to occur. 04.Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be detennined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. /20, 6 Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. L co m 3 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N O 00 co c� a M m r c m E M c� a Packet Pg. 815 Co[[�er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collier ov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20170004414 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfLgov Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summer.brownaraque@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudine.auclair@colliercountyflgov L Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 Stephen.baluch@colliercountyflgov C Ray Begows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@co€liercountyfl,gov Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyflgov Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 Craig,brown@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyflgov Kay Desedem Zoning Services 252-2586 kay.deselem@colliercountyflgov Dale Fey North Collier Fire 597-9227 dfey@northcollierfire.com Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@coil iercountyfLgov LK Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfLgov Jed� Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyflgov C Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paula.fleishman@colliercountyfLgov G James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5717 james.french@colliercountyf€.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyflgov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering 5tormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyflgov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Shar Hingson Greater Naples Fire District 774-2800 shingson@gnfire.org C John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov C Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodi.hughes@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov [I Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfLgov ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyflgov ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyflgov C! Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfLgov Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyflgov Updated 1/9/2018 Page 1 4 of 5 r Q Packet Pg. 816 COier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierRov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 ❑ Stefanie Nawrocki Development Review - Zoning 252-2313 stefanie.nawrocki@colliercountyflgov `K Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandy.otero@colliercountyflgov Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfLgov C Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Division 252-4211 fred.reischl@colliercountyfLgov J Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com Daniel Roman, P.E. Engineering Utilities 252-2538 daniei.roman@colliercountyfLgov _ U Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyflgov James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner james.sabo@colI!ergo,net Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyflgov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyf ,gov ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyflgov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyflgov ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Division Operations 252-1042 camden.smith@colliercountyflgov Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-5740 scott.stone@colliercountyflgov C Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl,gov Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 1 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfLgov C Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 Jonathan.walsh@colliercountyflgov C David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 david.weeks@colliercountyflgov n Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 1 252-5748 1 christine.willoughby@colliercountyflgov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email Hb.� IN Ave) 0 b,%kO r . 5'0o n s+ `HI 3L� I � Z f S+ t Z .! "Q'4. L C VL '.135 jno.,iJa,.,�� ,i � t ►t I�.1 �y . f s- •�' sZ iiIn AM" 3myqra-2�b Jr�bs�►tc /�. „v I sac, 1 3 1 Alr r. GG Updated 1/9/2018 Page 15 of 5 9.B.e vn1 CL u M m r c as E u M a Packet Pg. 817 CAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2900 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A. -F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PDDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A. -F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s) N J Address: City: State: ZIP: a. N D Telephone: Cell: Fax: a E -Mail Address: 00 W v co Name of Applicant/Agent: Y U Firm: m r Address: City: State: ZIP: E Telephone: Cell: Fax: U R r r E -Mail Address: Q Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. 10/15/2017 Page 1 of 14 Packet Pg. 818 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www,collierFov.net 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: Zoning district(s) to the zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Original PUD Name: Ordinance No.: PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Size of Property: ft. x ft. = Total Sq. Ft. Acres: Address/ General Location of Subject Property: PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: 10/15/2017 ❑ Industrial Page 2 of 14 Packet Pg. 819 Cof hrer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application, Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: 10/15/2017 City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: Page 3 of 14 a� L a a� y 7 v r 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N a 00 cc v co a m r c m E U r r Q Packet Pg. 820 9.B.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collie[gov.net COLL1er County EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 10/15/2017 Page 4 of 14 Packet Pg. 821 9.B.e Cod er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes ❑ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. im— RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, F5. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to sup"ly necessary_information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. 10/15/2017 Page 5 of 14 r Q Packet Pg. 822 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Name of Applicant(s): Address: Telephone: E -Mail Address: Cofer County 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION City: State: Cell: Address of Subject Property (If available): City: State: ZIP: PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: Fax: TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System F1 C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Package Treatment Plant H (GPD Capacity): e. Seotic Svstem ZIP: I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: Average Daily: B. Sewer -Peak: Average Daily: If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: 10/15/2017 Page 6 of 14 Packet Pg. 823 9.B.e Cot.Cier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 10/15/2017 Page 7 of 14 Packet Pg. 824 cothe* r County 9.B.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for planned unit development ( PUD) zoning. We hereby designate , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this who is personally known to me or has produced 10/15/2017 Owner Printed Name day of , 201_ by as identification. Notary Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) Page 8 of 14 r Q Packet Pg. 825 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary ❑ E]❑ Completed Application with required attachments 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed (s) 1 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Statement of Utility Provisions 1 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all required documents ] Completed Exhibits A -F (see below for additional information)* ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ ❑ Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %:" x 11" copy ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ 10/15/2017 Page 9 of 14 CL U M m r c m E U R r r Q Packet Pg. 826 Codiil County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (2391252-6358 Checklist continues on this page Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams & David Berra Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1I Immokalee Water/Sewer District: El *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement `The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU Rural Fringe Mixed Use Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: Fi School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFI: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams & David Berra ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION -- Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 >- PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre �—�Environmental PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre omprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 �� Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 10/15/2017 Page 10 of 14 r Q Packet Pg. 827 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Legal Advertising Fees: CCPC: $1,125,00 BCC: $500.00 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 2S2-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5" and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party 10/15/2017 Date Page 11 of 14 r Q Packet Pg. 828 Co[tier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coiliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252- 5358 EXHIBIT A (To be completed in a separate document and attached to the applicotion packet.) PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") bythe process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: CONDITIONAL USES (Optional) 1. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Table below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the (type of PUD) PUD Residential Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. 10/15/2017 Page 14 of 14 9.B.e Packet Pg. 829 9.B.e EXHIBIT B (To be completed in a separate document and attached to the application packet.) TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE TWO-FAMILY, CLUBHOUSE/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE FAMILY PATIO & MULTI- RECREATION FAMILY ATTACHED & ZERO LOT LINE FAMILY BUILDINGS TOWNHOUSE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA S.F. PER S.F. PER S.F. PER UNIT S.F. PER UNIT S.F. PER UNIT UNIT UNIT MINIMUM LOT WIDTH FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA S.F S.F S.F S.F./D.U. N/A MIN FRONT YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A MIN SIDE YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A MIN REAR YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A MIN PRESERVE SETBACK FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN FEET or BH, STRUCTURES FEET FEET FEET whichever is greater N/A MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET SIDE FEET FEET FEET FEET BH REAR FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET PRESERVE SETBACK FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET DISTANCE BETWEEN PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED SPS SPS 5P5 or FEET FEET S.P.S. = Same as Principal Structures BH = Building Height Footnotes as needed 10/15/2017 Page 15 of 14 CL U M m r c m E t U R r r Q Packet Pg. 830 9.B.e GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Setback may be either feet ( ) on one side or feet ( ) on the other side in order to provide a minimum separation between principal structures of feet ( ). Alternatively, if the foot ( ) setback option is not utilized, then the minimum setback shall not be less than feet ( ) and the combined setback between principal structures shall be at least feet ( ). At the time of the application for subdivision plat approval for each tract, a lot layout depicting minimum yard setbacks and the building footprint shall be submitted. TABLE 11 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT * Whichever is greater ** Per principal structure, on the finished first floor. 10/15/2017 Page 16 of 14 CL U M m r c m E t U R r r Q Packet Pg. 831 PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA Sq. Ft. N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH Ft. N/A MINIMUM YARDS (External) From Immokalee Road Canal ROW Ft. SPS From Future Extension of Collier Blvd. Ft. SPS From Western Project Boundary Ft. Ft. MINIMUM YARDS (Internal) Internal Drives/ROW Ft. Ft. Rear Ft. Ft. Side Ft. Ft. MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES Ft. or sum of Building heights Ft. MAXIMUM HEIGHT Retail Buildings Ft. Ft. Office Buildings Ft. Ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA Sq. Ft. ** N/A MAX. GROSS LEASABLE AREA Sq. Ft. N/A * Whichever is greater ** Per principal structure, on the finished first floor. 10/15/2017 Page 16 of 14 CL U M m r c m E t U R r r Q Packet Pg. 831 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net CAT County 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: 7 C. Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the 1ercentage of stocK owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the elufludge U1 in�eres�: I Name and Address I % of Ownership I Created 9/28/2017 Page i of 3 Packet Pg. 832 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net '.7 e Coder County 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-5358 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the 9 ciirlai airufuf nnnLeu PC1rL11CrS: Name and Address °% of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the miters, stocKnoiaers, Deneticianes, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of iters, IT a corporation, partnersnip, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 as L N N 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N D a 00 W c� a m r c as E U a r r Q Packet Pg. 833 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: Date option terminates: Anticipated closing date: CAT County 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-5358 or AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The compieted application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Napies, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Date Page 3 of 3 r Q Packet Pg. 834 9.B.e Collier County Payment Slip (PL) Date: January 10, 2018 Contact: GradyMinor - Sharon Umpenhour 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Project Name: SB 32 RPUD Project Number: PL20170004414 FEES: Fee Description I Reference Number I Amount Pre -application Meeting PL20170004414 $500.00 Total: $500.00 00 w v co CL U M m r c m E M U a r r Q Packet Pg. 835 Receipt Number: Transaction Number: Date Paid: Amount Due: Payment Details Amount Paid: Change / Overage: Contact: FEE DETAILS: Fee Description Pre -application Meeting Cashier Name: Batch Number: Entered By: Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Drive N. Naples, FL 34104 239-252-2400 RECEIPT 4F PAYMENT 2018463739 2018-002487 01/10/2018 $500.00 9.B.e Payment Method Amount Paid Check Number Check $500.00 1-00143756 $500.00 $0.00 NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SW FL LLC 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD SARASOTA ,FL 34240 Reference Numter Original Amount Fee Paid PL20170004414 $500.00 $500.00 MartinRuedy 6983 JessicaVelasco Account 131-138326-341276 Packet Pg. 836 9.B.e Applicant/Agent may also send site Co ler Countyplans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. Growth Management Department Zoning Division PL20170004414 PRE -APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Camden Smith, Jessica Velasco STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre -app request Sharon Umpenhour, 239-947-1144, sumpenhour@gradyminor.com for Wayne Arnold • Agent to list for PL# Wayne Arnold (Sharon Umpenhour) in CityView System. Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) 0 00407520002 owned by Cross and Thompson LLC 0 00407840009 owned by Cross and Thompson LLC 0 00407960002 owned by Cross and Thompson LLC 0 00408120003 owned by Robert Tetrault Rev Trust & Kathleen M Tetrault Rev Trust 0 00408200004 owned by Cross and Thompson LLC 0 00408360009 owned by Cross and Thompson LLC ----27.19 acres estimated----- • Confirm Purpose of Pre -App: (Rezone, etc.) PUD Rezone to allow 224 residential dwelling units with access from Cope Lane a Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that m apply): r c m E The project proposes a maximum of 7du/acre as it is within the density band. The proposed housing is market U rate. r Q • Details about Project (choose type that applies): PUD Rezone — market rate housing REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Sharon Umphenhour For Wayne Arnold sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239-947-1144 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information a t,a Zoning Dmsim • 28M Nath Hoseshoe Orme - Naples. Florida 34104.239-252-2400 • www.coliergov.nel Packet Pg. 837 i ��►� aR '� .`'.-� ..lig.CL N Ivib _ F . {-r ~ � � •til �. � 1 . , ' � �y �; � - � i _ � ` + ' � l,. � � . • ! :1 :ice`• .3 _ Y �' � � ./mo�i T.Ty - -'`r`• 16 IN 49.60 IN Ir 141 l i 1K Job 1 r F. fit iii �' J Pima "Of ON '� • o� 'Pop trMt NIL SUBJECT ow .11 IL 'r' -.. tea+ �. �• J4 .+ .O + �'r }u OF - YL ir CR wi:. c 00 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00407520002 Site Adr. 2505 SUNSET BLVD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Name / Address CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC 13690 OLD LIVINGSTON RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34109 9.13.e Map No. Strap No, Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5B09 000100 021 5609 9 50 26 4.54 a� L Legal 9 50 26 S1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 LESS THAT PORTION AS DESC 1N OR 4337 PG 541 Milla a Area O 105 Millage Rates O *Calculations y Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code O 67 - POULTRY, BEES, TROPICAL FISH, RABBITS, E 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 v Latest Sales History 2017 Certified Tax Roll CD0 (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality)Q (Subject to Change} o Date Book -Page Amount Land Value $ 204,300 N a 11/18/16 5337-3607 $ 0 (+} Improved Value $ 0 p 05/06/03 3283-525 $ 437,500 :3 04/24/98 2412-2660 $ 0 (_ } Market Value $ 204,300 a- 01/23/97 2275-285 $ 0 {-) Agriculture $ 201,382 m 04/01/90 1517-963 $ 0 {_) Assessed Value $ 2,918 v co {_} School Taxable Value $ 2,918 a Y L) {_} Taxable Value $ 2,918 m If all Values shown above equal o this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll +- C tU E L V R Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=604095928&ccpavel=1710181149 Packet Pg. 840 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No. 00407520002 Site Adr. 2505 SUNSET BLVD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Name / Address CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC 13690 OLD LMNGSTON RD City NAPLES Tax Yr issuer Permit # Land # Calc Code 10 20 State FL Zip 34109 Permits CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type Building/Extra Features Units # Year Built Description Area 4.14 0.4 Y 9.B.e m L a Adj Area N m N 7 N a 0 w v co CL U M M r Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetaii.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver=17101811 Packet Pg. 841 9.B.e Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No. 00407520002 Site Adr. 2505 SUNSET BLVD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features CL U m 00 r c m E t U R r r Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_ search/RecordDetail.html?sid=604095928&ccpavei=1710181149 Packet Pg. 842 P 9.B.e Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00407840009 Site Adr. Name / Address CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC 13690 OLD LIVINGSTON RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34109 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5B09 000100 029 5B09 9 50 26 4.2 a� L Legal 9 50 26 S1/2 OF SWI/4 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4, LESS THAT PORTION AS DESC IN OR 4337 PG 541 a Millaae Area 4 105 Millacle Rates 4 `Calculations N Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total y 3 Use Code O 67 - POULTRY, BEES, TROPICAL FISH, RABBITS, E 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 0 Latest Sales History 2017 Certified Tax Roll o (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) O Date Book -Page Amount Land Value $ 189,000 � IL 11/18/16 5337-3607 $ 0 (+) Improved Value $ 0 N 05/06/03 3283-525 $ 437,500 (_ } Market Value $ 189,000 a 04/24/98 2412-2652 $ 0 (-} Agriculture 5186,06C oo 04/01/90 1517-971 $ 0 {_} Assessed Value $ 2,94C e l = I School Taxable Value $ 2,94C (_? Taxable Value $ 2.94( um if all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll m r C d E t V R Q http://www.colIierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver=1710181 1 Packet Pg. 843 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No. 00407840009 Site Adr. Name / Address CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC 13690 OLD LIVINGSTON RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34109 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit # CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type Land Building/Extra Features # Calc Code units # Year Built Description Area 10 4.2 9.B.e m L a Cn Adj Area — m N 7 N a 00 m v co CL U M M r Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver=171018114 Packet Pg. 844 9.B.e Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No. 00407840009 Site Adr. 4 en GIS in a New Window with More Features. r Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RccordDetail.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver=171018114 Packet Pg. 845 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No, 00407960002 Site Adr. 2401 SUNSET BLVD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Name / Address CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC 13690 OLD LIVINGSTON RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34109 9.B.e Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5B09 000100 032 5B09 9 50 26 4.25 a� L Legal 9 50 26 N1/2 OF NWl/4 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS THAT PORTION AS DESC IN OR 4337 PG 541 a Millage Area O 105 Milla a Rates O *Calculations a� rn Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total y Use Code 0 67 - POULTRY, BEES, TROPICAL FISH, RABBITS, E 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 v 0 Latest Sales History 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) o Date Book -Page Amount Land Value $ 191,250 N a 11/18/16 5337-3607 $ 0+} Improved Value $ 550 p 05/06/03 3283-525 $ 437,5$000 04/24/98 2412-2656 (_) Market Value $ 191,800 IL 04/01/90 1517-967 $ 0 { -) Agriculture $ 188730 ,v m (_) Assessed Value $ 3,070 {_) School Taxable Value $ 3,070 Y (_) Taxable Value $ 3,070 m If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll r C d E t V R Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDeta l.html?sid=604095928&cepavel=1710181149 Packet Pg. 846 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No. 00407960002 Site Adr. 2401 SUNSET BLVD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Name / Address CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC 13690 OLD LMNGSTON RD Tax Yr Issue # 10 20 City NAPLES r Permit # Land Calc Code State FL Zip 34109 Permits CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type Building/Extra Features Units # Year Built Description Area 3.55 10 2015 CARPORT 80 0.7 20 2011 GARAGE 64 9.B.e m L a Cn Adj Area — m s0 y 64 N a CL U M M r Q http:l/www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetaii.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver-171018114 Packet Pg. 847 9.B.e Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No. 00407960002 Site Adr. 2401 SUNSET BLVD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. 00 w v co CL U m 00 r c m E t U R r r Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/rnain_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver=1710181149 Packet Pg. 848 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00408120003 Site Adr. 2380 SUNSET BLVD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Name / Address ROBERT L TETRAULT REV TRUST KATHLEEN M TETRAULT REV TR 2380 SUNSET BLVD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34112-8711 9.B.e Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres `Estimated 5609 000100 036 5609 9 50 26 5 L M Legal 9 50 26 51/2 OF SE1/4 OF SWI/4 OF NW1/4 5 AC a Millage Area O 105 Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER Use Code d 1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 09/27/11 4724-2846 $ 0 06/24/02 3060-3120 $ 345,000 09/13/01 2891-2942 $ 100 12/31/98 2497-3279 $ 400,000 07/18/94 1968-287 $ 105,000 05/25/94 1950-2208 $ 0 04/01/92 1704-2018 $ 0 a� Millacle Rates O *Calculations y School Other Total v 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 v 0 2017 Certified Tax Roll 0 iSubject to [hinge) O Land Value $ 127,455 N a (+) Improved Value $ 300,58( 0 t =) Market Value $ 428,04-1 a - i Save our Home $ 122.29( 00 (_) Assessed Value $ 305,75= le a (-) Homestead $ 25,00{ Y (_) School Taxable Value $ 280,755 L) m (-) Additional Homestead $ 25,00C c (_) Taxable Value $ 255,755 m t If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll v R Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/ReeordDetail.html?sid=60409592$&ccpaver-1710181 [4t Packet Pg. 849 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No. 00408120003 Site Adr. 2380 SUNSET BLVD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Name / Address ROBERT L TETRAULT REV TRUST KATHLEEN M TETRAULT REV TR 2380 SUNSET BLVD City NAPLES Tax Yr Issuer Permit # 1993 COUNTY 91-5425 1995 COUNTY 94-10779 Land # Calc Code 10 ACREAGE 20 ACREAGE State FL Permits Zip 34112-8711 9.B.e CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type a� 07/09/93 10/16/95 ADDITION a r Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_searchIRecordDetai1.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver=171018114 Packet Pg. 850 Building/Extra Features y Units # Year Built Description Area Adj Area 2.83 10 1993 RESIDENTIAL 2184 4372 2.17 20 1995 GARAGE 312 v 650 c 30 1995 GARAGE 192 227 0 ti 0 N J a N a r Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_searchIRecordDetai1.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver=171018114 Packet Pg. 850 Collier County Property Appraiser 40 12 13 3 20 3. 34 SP 40 11 11 SP 40 CG d4 'd' 12 d µ 24 u 312 SSD 10 CG NO 192 27 13 P1C1� ON 1+1 20' 0 +3UP70 112H ■ STOR 50 216H 924 bid 1392 34 S 0 30 I 101—M Soo 126 Detaft file: 00408120003.18111 Nell Sunnmuy: 6J N m i0 192 FOW MAM C.xY. Laa exripti 1 • l Ease Living Area 11UP10 Living Urea Up 701 113 E Salt High 601 .A9 W tiara" Attach" Sat STOP SO Storage Area SO% Sn 10 Sun frock 101 5➢ 10 SrA neck 101 515 10 Sun Leek 101 5D 10 roe D—k 101 5D f6 mm 0eek 1O1 Aces A01. Are. 2186 3144 124 661 B64 366 712 396 1392 496 126 13 192 14 106 11 480 48 126 13 7186 4371 µ 36 36 1a 22 6i"M 9.0 GROUND FLOOR Page t o 9 B e http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_searchIDocviewer.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver 1... Packet Pg. 851 Collier County Property Appraiser 9.13.e Property Aerial Parcel No. 00408120003 Site Adr. 2380 SUNSET BLVD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features CL U m m r c m E t U R r r Q httpJ/www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver=1710181149 Packet Pg. 852 9.B.e Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00408200004 Site Ad r. Name / Address CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC 13690 OLD LIVINGSTON RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34109 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5609 000100 038 5009 9 50 26 5 a� L Legal 9 50 26 S1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 5 AC cu a Milla a Area O 105 9 * Millage Rates 0 Calculations rn Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total y W Use Code O 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 v 0 Latest Sales History 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) p Date Book -Page Amount Land Value $ 225,00( N a 12/28/16 5350-994 $ 40,000 f+) Improved Value $ { N 12/28/16 5350-983 $ 0 p 07/20/70 361-221 $ 0 f=} Market Valuea $ 225,00( f=) Assessed Value $ 225,00( m {_) School Taxable Value S225,00( v (_) Taxable Value $ 225,00( a Y If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was treated after the Final Tax Roll m r C d E L V R Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetai1.htmI?sid=604095928&ccpaver=i 710181141 Packet Pg. 853 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No. 00408200004 Site Adr. Name / Address CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC 13690 OLD LMNGSTON RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34109 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit # CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type Land Building/Extra Features # Calc Code Units # Year Built Description Area 10 ACREAGE 5 9.B.e m L a Adj Area m N 7 tY N C D a 00 m v co CL U M M r Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/RecordDetail.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver=1710181149 Packet Pg. 854 9.B.e Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No. 00408200004 Site Adr. Open GIS in a New Window with More Featrrr, CL U m 00 r c m E t U tv r r Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver=171018114 Packet Pg. 855 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00408360009 Site Adr. 2303 SUNSET BLVD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Name / Address CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC 13690 OLD LIVINGSTON RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34109 9.B.e Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5609 000100 041 5B09 9 50 26 4.2 a� L Legal 9 50 26 N1/2 OF SWI/4 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4, LESS THAT PORTION AS DESC IN OR 4337 PG 541 Millage Area O 105 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations a� y Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 67 - POULTRY, BEES, TROPICAL FISH, RABBITS, E 5.122 6.3384 11.4604 v Latest sales History 2017 Certified Tax Roll CD0 (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality)10 {Subject to Change) o Date Book -Page Amount Land Value$ 189,000 N ii 11/18/16 5337-3607 0 i+) Improved Value $ 0 p 05/06/03 3283-524 $ 155,0$000 02/06/71 385-99 f = ) Market Value $ 189,000 a { -) Agriculture $ 186,060 m v (z) Assessed Value $ 2,940 (_) School Taxable Value $ 2,940 a Y (_) Taxable Value $ 2.940 L) m If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was treated after the Final Tax Roll r C d E t V R Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/RecordDetail.htmi?sid=604095928&ecpaver=1710181149 Packet Pg. 856 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No. 00408360009 Site Adr. 2303 SUNSET BLVD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Name / Address CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC 13690 OLD LIVINGSTON RD City NAPLES State FL Zip 34109 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit # CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type Land Building/Extra Features # Calc Code Units # Year Built Description Area 10 4.2 9.13.e m L a Adj Area N m N 7 N a 00 m v co CL U M M r Q http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_searchlRecordDetail.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver=171018114 Packet Pg. 857 9.B.e Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No. 00408360009 Site Adr. 2303 SUNSET BLVD, NAPLES, FL 34112 Q en GIS in a New Window with More Features. CL U m 00 r c m E t U R r r Q httpa/www.collierappraiser.com/main_ search/RecordDetail.html?sid=604095928&ccpaver=1710181 14Packet Pg. 858 9.B.e ewrcle RPUD' PUD" s�� MAT.H I�elatic 60LT M00111IIf. uia MPUo' „ A' u L Daoas ---------- - - - - -- INDICATES SPECIIILTREATMENT OVERLAY THIS FS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A PAGE OF THE 4 OF 0ICU4 7DNING ATLAS FEFERHEO TO AND ADOPTED SUBDIVISOHiHOEX / BY REFERENCE BY ORDINANCE NO 9441 OF THE COUNTY OF COLLIER. FLORIDA, ADOPTED JUNE 21 2W4. AS ALAE LADED BY THE 2ONI NG NOTES AND SUBOINSION g INDEX REFERENCED HEREON. .. oo�.,..a... n 2 BY CHAIRMAN -1 r4 Z _^= COLLIER COUNTY, FLDRipA CWuMADNITY DEVELOPMENT ORASION TVJP 505 RING 28E SEC(S) D9 NO V2N ® MAP NUM ATTEST CLERK CL BER m 0809N Packet Pg. 859 9.B.e U5'ONf1 r � r I � I nr�ca 1 I T I a3 PUD � • E�RW ooas i cgMi�.f [1u11 A' s F PUD W n3eeow o..rt6 LL 1 rM — I 0818N INDICATES SPECIAL TREAT WENT OVERLAY THIS IS TO CEN7IFV THAT THIS IS A PAGE OF THE OF FICIAL ZONING ATLAS REFERRER TO AND ADOPTED SU9gINSOH INDEX BY REFERENCE BY ORDINANCE NO G"I OF THE COUNTY OF CpWER, FLORIDA ADOPTEp JUNE 22, 20D/, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA AS AMENDED BY THE ZONING NOTES AND 5i1BWSION INDEX REFERENCED HEREON BY CHAIRMRk ii ATTEST CLERK CpMMl1NITY DEVELtlPME N? DIVISIOIlk N TWP US RNG 26E SECISI 09 SO 12 N � 46RP NUMBER CL 06(185 Q Packet Pg. 860 71 SCALE: 1- 80 - BUILDING INFORI-10N zz . ....... .. j T 01 go D gi- j L 7-1 LLL nil L SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD GradyiMinor R" CONCEPT PLAN 4 NOVEMBER 16, 2 I. I. . ....... D- Packet Pg. 8617 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net Cofter County Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 c Lir i FAL 9.B.e -7-10 rl y. -t i n./ 74 JI PMU��l Jvj�//-� �� . f 1 ` 7 I fr s /l� VA -C' L7 h/ 1 L ca co 3 O O 0 ti T 0 N J a N O a 00 co Iq 50- M m m m r c m E z c� a Packet Pg. 862 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S)PL20170004414(Russell Square RPUD) Michael Greenberg (print name), as vice President (title, if applicable) of Meal Communiikes of5ou[hwestFludda, LLC (company, Ifa licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Q- Grady Minor and Associates. P.A- and Coleman, rovanovi ch & Koester, P.A- to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. "Notes: ■ If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. ■ If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L -L, C.) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." ■ if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. ■ If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership, ■ If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". ■ in each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Sig STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 9.B.e a X3.10 Date m The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on 1 23 / f (date) by 1 (name of person providin oath or affirmation), as Pceatd who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of i entification) as identification. M y STAMPIW'1� mak" 01. ••Rr W* ER . IScam•• ER �� AW a do ow IMS _meq o w-� C no R di ASV 31241ITo;i0iIII111111►1�N Signature of Notary PLMlic r Q Packet Pg. 863 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Coibe' r County 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the 0 C. ercentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership John D. Bruce 100% 2402 Sunset Boulevard, Naples 34112 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership Cross and Thompson, LLC 100% Owner-Aruso Cross, Authorized Member, 6820 Daniels Rd. Naples 34109 50% Owner -Michael Thompson, Authorized Member, 6820 Daniels Rd. Naples 34109 100% 2380 Sunset Blvd., Naples, FL 34112 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Robert M. Tetrault, Trustee of the Robert L. Tetrault Revocable Trust 50% Kathleen M Tetrault, Trustee of the Kathleen M Tetrault Revocable Trust 50% LK, estate reserved for Robert L. Tetrault and Kathleen M. Tetraalt, husband and wife, pursuant to a grant contained in the Deed recorded in Book 4724, page 2846 100% 2380 Sunset Blvd., Naples, FL 34112 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 864 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net go Co er County 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the neidi dim/ui iinnLeu PdILIM[b. Name and Address I % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: f C Name and Address % of Ownership Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC 100 5800 Lakewood Ranch Blvd. North, Sarasota, FL 34240 See Attached Annual Reports Owner - Patrick K. Neal, Manager 100 James R. Schier, Manager Date of Contract: 12/07/2017 If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers. if a corporation. DartnershiD. or trust: Name and Address Date subject property acquired 2011 and 2016 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 865 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: go Co er County 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 <—D May 23, 2018 Agent/Owner Signature D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Date Page 3 of 3 CL cc m r c m E U R r r Q Packet Pg. 866 2017 FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT FILED DOCUMENT# L09000120732 Oct 04, 2017 Entity Name: NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, LLC Secretary of State CC5810333033 Current Principal Place of Business: 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. SARASOTA, FL 34240 Current Mailing Address: 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. SARASOTA, FL 34240 US FEI Number: 27-1576866 Certificate of Status Desired: No Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: SCHIER, JAMES R 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. SARASOTA, FL 34240 US The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Authorized Person(s) Detail : Title MGR Name NCDG MANAGEMENT, LLC Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title VP Name SCHIER, JAMES R Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title VP Name GREENBERG, MICHAEL Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title VP Name PUENTE,CARLOS Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title P Name STOREY, MICHAEL A Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title S Name HEIM, PRISCILLA G Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title VP Name SOCHAR,MARK Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title VP Name CIOFFI, KATHY Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Continues on page 2 I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am a managing member or manager of the limited liability company or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 605, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: JAMES R SCHIER VP 10/04/2017 Electronic Signature of Signing Authorized Person(s) Detail Date 9.B.e Q Packet Pg. 867 Authorized Person(s) Detail Continued Title VP Name CLARK, CHRIS Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title VP Name CRONSHAW,TASHARA Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title VP Name EVANS,MARK Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title VP Name OAK, TIM Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title VP Name COLLIER, JOHN Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title VP Name ENGELS, CATHY Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title VP Name FROST, JASON Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 Title VP Name WEINTRAUB, LEISA Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: SARASOTA FL 34240 9.B.e d L R 3 a N d rn to 3 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N D a 00 co v co a U cc m r c m E U a r r Q Packet Pg. 868 2017 FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT DOCUMENT# L09000121640 Entity Name: NCDG MANAGEMENT, LLC Current Principal Place of Business: 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. BRADENTON, FL 34240 Current Mailing Address: 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. BRADENTON, FL 34240 US FEI Number: NOT APPLICABLE Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: SCHIER, JAMES R 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. BRADENTON, FL 34240 US FILED Apr 20, 2017 Secretary of State CC6511508580 Certificate of Status Desired: No The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Authorized Person(s) Detail Title MGR Name NEAL, PATRICK K Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: BRADENTON FL 34240 Title MGR Name SCHIER, JAMES R Address 5800 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD. City -State -Zip: BRADENTON FL 34240 I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am a managing member or manager of the limited liability company or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 605, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: JAMES R SCHIER MANAGER 04/20/2017 Electronic Signature of Signing Authorized Person(s) Detail Date 9.B.e Packet Pg. 869 Co Y County 9.B.e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collie%ov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 2S2-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Parcel No. 00407520002. 00407840009.O04074E0002, 00409200004 and 00409380009 2505, 2401 and 2303 Sunset Blvd, Naples, FL 34112 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development (R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval an the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is In force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, +Cma. and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit t and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with nditians and safeguards of the planned unit developmei Owner d Member of Gross and Thompson, LLC M.T.i ro. ra�.en e�a,aerer crop eb nnmoun. u.c { Printed I\16me Printed Name 4 �r STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed � w�before me this 24 day of i�J 20118 by ✓ Ura .J. Cfys who is personall,,l 79 %fid ced L13 as identification. rr ub is tat (dame typed, printed or stamped) 10/15/2017ql❑� d� ~ 94 ■......+' �`� THOMAS WALPOLE IV CH29610695 239-732-3632 26235-010 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. COID 287 EAGLE CREEK AU 66649 Page S of 14 CL U M m r c m E t U R r Q Packet Pg. 870 INSTR 5339208 OR 5337 PG 3607 RECORDED 11/30/2016 9:08 AM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $0.70 REC $27.00 EXHIBIT 'A' Prepared bv: Brian 0. Cross, Esq. Goede, Adamczyk, DeBoest & Cross PLLC 8950 Fontana Del Sol Way, Suite 100 Naples, Florida 34109 Parcel Identification No's. 00407520002/00407840009/00407960002/00408360009 Warranty Deed This Indenture made this 10 day of IyV00-4`hgV-47,—, 2016 between C & T Properties Unlimited, a Florida General Partnership, whose post office address is 3227 S. Horseshoe Drive, #100, Naples, FL 34104, grantor*, and Cross and Thompson, LLC, a Florida limited liability company whose post office address is 6820 Daniels Road, Naples, Florida 34109 • grantee*, ,fN� Witnesseth that said grantor,;fcgr, ;N46dJ in constderatton 'of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and othef good;and.valuable considerations �o said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof �s hetel>y, acknowledj�d, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's I*irsfaAd sign or�� f lc`ing described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, F��rtt�a,'t�-�iitI I I a� � k` s r • i Q Parcel A C 1 ly�) of the Southw (ii�rter (1/4) of the Southwest The South One-Hal00 a - „Otte One -Quarter of the Not#st One -Quarter (1 /4�'pf'Se tion 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County.jay 4 reservinger�th5 the east thirty (30) feet for road .. . 51 � � right-of-way purposes only` ----~''' Y ., Parcel B _ fe m The North One -Half (1/2) of the Northwest One Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest One -Quarter of the Southwest One -Quarter (1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, reserving therefrom the east thirty (30) feet for road E right-of-way purposes only; also known as Tract 40 of unrecorded Plat. r r Q Parcel C The South One -Half (1/2) of the Northwest One Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest One -Quarter of the Southwest One -Quarter (1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Less 30 feet for easement on the South Line and 30 feet for easement on the east line for road right-of-way purposes only. Also known as Tract 39, enchanted acres, Collier County, Florida. Parcel D The North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, reserving therefrom the East 30 feet for road right of way containing 5 acres more or less; also described as Tract 42, Enchanted Acres. . Packet Pg. 871 OR 5337 PG 3608 and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the samc against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the titic,to:sd;I� 4and will defend the same against the lawful yT�:.. claims of all persons whomsoever,,,'a� t d'f d nst�e of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to Decemb�r0i6.'� The ownership structure of documentary stamps are due 0 OF PAGE INTE { 70NAI Accordingly, only minimum subject property. BLANK] 9.B.e Packet Pg. 872 *** OR 5337 PG 3609 *** In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantors hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: C& T roperties Unlimited, a Florida / Gener artnership Witness Signa re: ( Print Name: t By. as ��Yv Witness Signature: Print Name: Eu"A __61-z.A,,� STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument 2016 by , Partnership, who[ V is , as identification. My Commission Expires: C' i'sS: i ";day of IL0.1 M j ppjrties Unlimited, a Florida General l h pl o4u' eo ► i L co as 3 o: 0 0 0 ti T O N J a N 0 a 00 W m CL M V M m C d E t V a Packet Pg. 873 O � ,.,." lfwME. Ch "'...�. 00!A(ISSION i FF 914169 * # �6(Y ECPAES: SepWtff 19, 2019 `',r' ��PF BadediNuBudpbN:hrysm�ka. i ";day of IL0.1 M j ppjrties Unlimited, a Florida General l h pl o4u' eo ► i L co as 3 o: 0 0 0 ti T O N J a N 0 a 00 W m CL M V M m C d E t V a Packet Pg. 873 INSTR 5352815 OR 5350 PG 994 RECORDED 1/4/2017 10:22 AM PAGES 4 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $280.00 REC $35.50 INDX $2.00 CONS $40,000.00 Prepared By and Return To: Kris Unkrich Focus Title Group, LLC 8950 Fontana Del Sol Way, Suite 100 Naples, Florida 34109 Tax Folio No. 00408200004 Consideration: $40,000.00 Warranty Deed This Indenture is made this Z� day of December, 2016, by and between PAMELA JO MELLOTT A/K/A PAMELA JO MELLOTT JAMES, a <- (?, woman, and GARY DEWAYNE JAMES, a _ , iii %�( man individually and as Co -Trustees of the PAMELA'S TRUST PURSUANT TO THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF COTEAL N. MELLOTT DATED 9-15-1995, whose post office address is 15O Porkway 1l, a4zw X\( (Grantor*) and CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITEb LIABILITY COMPANY, whose mailing address is 6820 Daniels Rd., Naples, FL 34109 ("Grantee*"). Witnesseth that said Grantor, DOLLARS ($10.00) and other said Grantee, the receipt when the said Grantee, and Grantee's lying and being in Collier Cpu� The South one-half Northwest one -qua Section 9, Township,' the West thirty (30') only (Tract 50 of unr Range 26 3f. to be i plat) the sum of TEN AND NO/100 as to said Grantor in hand paid by Lsanted, bargained, and sold to following described land, situate, (NE 1/4) of the rter (SW 1/4) of .ty, Florida, Less of --way purposes Together with all the tenements, hereditaments arilappurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2016. The subject property is not Pamela Jo Mellott a/k/a Pamela Jo Mellott James' or Gary DeWayne James' homestead within the meaning of the Constitution of the State of Florida, nor is it contiguous to or part of Pamela Jo Mellott a/k/a Pamela Jo Mellott James' or Gary DeWayne James' homestead property. Pamela Jo Mellott a/k/a Pamela Jo Mellott James' homestead address is 1 S 0 a r l/_w o�3 51 - ,f --e f 1� Cf a orf . V_.eAt c, c and Gary�'ILI01 eWayne James' homestead address is: I Sp a r kw -13 r c/. k Y * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. 9.B.e CL U M m c m E U a r Q Packet Pg. 874 OR 5350 PG 995 In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness Signature- ( � Print Name: MQ-tiss--.- 5;. ot--� Witness Print Name: STATE OF COUNTY OF Pamela Je Mellott a/k/a Pamela Jo Mellott James and Gary DeWayne James, as Co - Trustees of the Pamela's Trust pursuant to the Last Will and Testament of Coteal N. Mellott Dated 9-15-1995 Mellott a/k/a Ft m vidually and as Co - .11 4 ) The foregoing instrum my fas acknowledged bggre mo thot_ -day of December, 2016, by Pamela Jo Mellott a/k/a Pame1 tellott y James indi 11.s Co -Trustee of the Pamela s Trust pursuant to the Last Will and Te" of Coteal N. Melloe{ 9-15-1995, who[ ] is personally known to me or who [/] has produce as identification. My commission expires: Printt�Name: � i -Y o.ni F� �jL w w Not Public, State ofIL ...r"" [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] m L a m N 7 v 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N a 00 v co a U M C m E V M r Q Packet Pg. 875 OR 5350 PG 996 Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness Signature: Print Name: fAO—t iS,5C 5 i 2� ►--� Witness Signa e Name: l� . Print r r,/; 6 w� Q 1 1V& - STATE OF r__Y COUNTY OF The foregoing instr Gary DeWayne James, indi Testament of Coteal N. M produced 6 Or, 1/I J-5 My commission expires: WARRANTY DEED Pamela Jo Mellott a/k/a Pamela Jo Mellott James and Gary DeWayne James, as Co - Trustees of the Pamela's Trust pursuant to the Last Will and Testament of Coteal N. Mellott Dated 9-15-1995 n By. ; Q'� (�f Gary DeWayne James, di du a y and as Co -Trustee td me Print Name: `,VA -t' ^-�lRl",Pia`1dkdte of day of December, 2016, by st pursuant to the Last Will and'- known to me or who his 9.B.e m a m N 7 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N 0 W co a cc m E a a Packet Pg. 876 *** OR 5350 PG 997 *** EXHIBIT "A" The South one-half (S1/2) of the Northeast one-quarter (NE 1/4) of the Northwest one-quarter (NW 1/4) of the Southwest one-quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier. County, Florida, Less the West thirty (30') feet thereof, to be used for road right-of-way purposes only (Tract 50 of unrecorded plat) U Co jJff �} 9.B.e Packet Pg. 877 EXHIBIT B (Property excluded from the parcels described in the Deeds attached as Exhibit A to the Covenant of Unified Control) LESS that portion of said land, taken by eminent domain proceeding between Collier County, Florida and C&T Properties Unlimited as evidenced by Order of Taking recorded March 10, 2008 in Official Records Book 4337, Page 541, Case Number 07 -4923 -CA referenced to as Parcel 126FEE and being more particularly described as: A parcel of land lying in the Southwest and Northwest quarters of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the West quarter corner of said Section 9; thence South 00050'29" East along the West line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 9 a distance of 653.41 feet to an intersection with the Northerly right-of-way line of Cope Lane; thence South 89057'32" East along said Northerly right-of-way line, a distance of 38.83 feet; thence leaving said Northerly right-of-way line North 07021'18" East, a distance of 207.06 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Westerly and having a radius of 3,100.00 feet; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 08020'02" an arc distance of 450.91 feet to an intersection with the North line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 9; thence North 00058'38" West, a distance of 685.18 feet to an intersection with the Northerly line of a parcel of land as described in O.R. 3283, Page 524, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence South 89039'02" West along said Northerly line, a distance of 100.01 feet to an intersection with the West line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 9; thence South 00058'38" East along said West line, a distance of 686.37 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described. \490154\62 - # 10717636 vl 9.B.e CL U M m r c m E U R r r Q Packet Pg. 878 Coder C M"ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Parcel No. 00407720006 2402 Sunset Blvd, Naples, FL 34112 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development (R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate" °'m—tt` & S,,'",- Fl -d,, "° , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to abtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the p roject: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with II rms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Ow r Owner John 0. Bruce Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me thisAthday of 3w,"201" b who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. Notary Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) 99i REDMAN 10/15/2017i0h1 � GC 123845 EXPIRES. 13.2021 Page 8 of 14 CL U M m r c m E t U R r Q Packet Pg. 879 INSTR 4634950 OR 4743 PG 3398 RECORDED 12/8/2011 9:00 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $1,995.00 REC $18.50 CONS $285,000.00 r "I Prepared by: Bill McFarland, P.A. P.O. Box 101507 Cape Coral, Florida 33910 Parcel Identification Number: 00407720006 EXHIBIT'A' (Space Above This Line For Recording Data) WARRANTY DEED This Warranty Deed made this day of A 2011, between Tarp Properties #2, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose post office address is 10954 Bonita Beach Road, Bonita Springs, FL 34135, hereinafter called the grantor, and John D. Bruce, a single man whose post office address is 2402 Sunset Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34112 called the grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees.) Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS (SIO.00) and other good and valuable consideration to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey, and confirm unto the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which grr r -h i - e -fallowing described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida to -wit: A- `SEE ATTACHED EX i $if A,; Subject to all easements, restrictions, Together, with all the tenements, To Have and to Hold, the same in And, the grantor hereby covenants wi has good right and lawful authority to same against the lawful claims of all I subsequent to December 31, 20I0. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: ,/� ($' aTure of First Witness) n] (Printed Name of First Witness (Signature of Second Witness) X -e a,... .r, Cie f (Printed Name of Second Witness) State of ,C76 County of tutee that the grantor is C onvey said land, and he`r` itu`nsoever; and that said appertaining. bid land in fee simple; that the grantor itle to said land and will defend the encumbrances, except taxes accruing year first above written. Tarp Properties #2, LLC, a F rids limited liabili ompanv By: Ba rey s m nager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3 o day of X l , 2011 by Barry Frey, as manager of Tarp Properties #2, �C, a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the company who is personally known to me or has produced '"14 -c,, 4 as identification. (Notary Seal) '- K R. LOTTES ' . MY COMMISSION I EE 028993 EXP(RES:August23,2p15 s,�,p rid Emded Thru Ndary Pub"c Unde Wen Signature of Notary Public/ Commission Exp: 9.B.e Q t Packet Pg. 880 *** OR 4743 PG 3399 *** f EXHIBIT 'A' The following described real property situated in the City of Naples, County of Collier, and State of Florida, to wit: The North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, containing 5 acres, more or less. Less Road Easements on the West side of 30 -foot parcel also known Tract 49 Enchanted Acres. 2 9.B.e Packet Pg. 881 Colter County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252.2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Parcel No. 00408120003 2380 Sunset Blvd, Naples, FL 34112 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development (R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate'"`..mfin°`s°"°— Wa. "` , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the propertyin the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 1 A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and saf ned unit development. ner Ow er Robert L. Telraull, indmd ually, Kash en M. Telrault, individually, pursuant to a life estate granted under Deed recorded in Book 4724, page 2646 pursua nt to a life estate knainted under Beed recorded in Book 4724, paga 2846 P '��LCR;DA) ame � Prl ted' y�ame � l` STAF F COUNTY OF COLLIER) 'rergm (f -I Sworn to {or affirmed} and subscribed before me this �_ day oflf11) '� 201 by �Cf ►� M_ T�7�A�+Z who is personaII known tp me or has produced as identification. y'* X- Notary Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) VICI4 L SMITH 10/15/2017.Aft' COMMI55IOi+E ! FF 958667 ' = EXPIRES: April 24, 2020 y Bonded Thru Notary Pubrlc werxailws Page 8 of 14 CL U M ot] c m E t U R r r Q Packet Pg. 882 INSTR 4613019 OR 4724 PG 2846 RECORDED 10/5/2011 11:41 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $18.50 Prepared by and return to: Robert L. Tetrault 2380 Sunset Boulevard Naples, FL 34112 EXHIBIT'A' Warranty Deed That on the X74 day of _ 5fPheMbC'-r , 2011, we: Robert L. Tetrault and Kathleen M. Tetrault, husband and wife, of 2380 Sunset Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34112, (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantors'), owners of the property hereinafter described, I In exchange for valuable considerreceipt o1 -�4""1hereby acknowledged grant ownership of the subject pre misstg't'` YLA ?ti An undivided fifty percent Tetrault Revocable Trust Da 34112, And An undivided fifty percent 0 Tetrault Revocable Trust Date 34112, (hereinafter referred to with warranty covenants, the tee of the Robert L. Boulevard, Naples, Florida F'"") to KathleV, M. etrat&I,iTrustee of the Kathleen M. �, 2011' 3 0 g o Boulevard, Naples, Florida Lees"), r %-.,I SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 48 OF ENCHANTING ACRES. SUBJECT to outstanding taxes, mortgages, restrictions, easements, or other conditions of record. Meaning and intending to convey that same parcel acquired by these grantors by Special Warranty Deed of CITIBANK dated May 22,2002; recorded in the official records of Collier County, Florida in O.R. Book 3060, Page 3120. THERE IS NO MONETARY CONSIDERATION FOR THIS DEED. Grantors reserve the right to reside in the real property placed in these Trusts, specifically the premises conveyed in this Warranty Deed, as their permanent residence during their lives. It is the intent of this provision to retain for the Grantors the requisite beneficial interest and possessor right in and to such real property to comply with Florida Statue 196.04 (2); with such interest being hereby declared to be the "equitable title to real estate," as that phrase is employed in Section 6, Article VII of the Constitution of the State of Florida. 9.B.e CL U cc 00 c m E t U R r Q Packet Pg. 883 *** OR 4724 PG 2847 *** We are husband and wife, and we hereby release any rights of homestead or other rights, statutory or under common law, we might have in the subject premises. L.S. Witness to Both (Print name: f� iR 1 �Cr`� S ) Witness to Both (Print State of Florida Collier County, SS L.S. THEN CAME, Robert L. Tetrault and Kathleen M. Tetrault,•personally known to me, or satisfactorily proven by a photo identification issued by a governmental agency, (specify ID) to be the individuals whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and they acknowledged that they executed the same for the purposes contained therein. BEFORE ME, r r. • Dated: Il 2011 Notary Public �� ,� PAldE1.A ANN HERNANDFI •`" ,q rarcoa��ssioNe ' �• •�s,�a „V EXPMM: j* n. mu a �rcamme,em m , CL U M m r c m E t U R r r Q Packet Pg. 884 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 9.B.e 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coll!eWv.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT Of UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Parcel Na. 00408120003 2380 Sunset Blvd, Naples, FL 34112 (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Residential planned unit development (R PUD) zoning. We hereby designate'- "°'t°. --F°` "� , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or In part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. 5o long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is br compliance with I ter. s, �condiilj��Suof the planned unit leve opment. caner w er Rc r. L T—h, T—W the Rahw[ L T—Ii Feixate Tn — $war 27, mk1. L � b IN Wa n N tqY ReMo[aUN f iuq ON S�r 77.1 Pr ed Name Printed Name �i.-�� STATE OF FLORIDA) COLINTYOFCOLLIER} Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this day of IR.. 2019 by g)�PJLi�A) K TP-TCA4N who is ersonall known to me or has produced j as identification. iJeAia •� Notary Public (Name typed, printed or stamped) 10/15/2017 VM L. SM :. MY QOMIr IMOON f FF S N&7 EXPIRES: Apra 24, 2o2o BMW ihru Ne" Prrhlie tledarwril®rs Page 8 of 14 CL U M m r c m E t U R r r Q Packet Pg. 885 INSTR 4613019 OR 4724 PG 2846 RECORDED 10/5/2011 11:41 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $18.50 Prepared by and return to: Robert L. Tetrault 2380 Sunset Boulevard Naples, FL 34112 EXHIBIT'A' Warranty Deed That on the .P4 day of .5f, 0 �rmlj,—,r' 2011, we: Robert L. Tetrault and Kathleen M. Tetrault, husband and wife, of 2380 Sunset Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34112, (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantors"), owners of the property hereinafter described, Ta` .'�C In exchange for valuable consider t e"receipt to w ie -, iereby acknowledged grant ownership of the subject remis)eo,Z�`,"'` ` An undivided fifty percent ($0%y inft&o rf t Tetrault, Tri Tetrault Revocable Trust Datd 0 se 34112, And l ,d ;' t4s An undivided fifty percent interest to Kathle� M.etraW; Tetrault Revocable Trust Date .e. ;Fnw6er 2011 390 %i ' 34112, (hereinafter referred to a = "Grantees"), -•, , `: ' with warranty covenants, the f-l-wiedperty: ;tee of the Robert L. Boulevard, Naples, Florida Irustee of the Kathleen M. Boulevard, Naples, Florida SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1A OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 48 OF ENCHANTING ACRES. SUBJECT to outstanding taxes, mortgages, restrictions, easements, or other conditions of record. Meaning and intending to convey that same parcel acquired by these grantors by Special Warranty Deed of CITIBANK dated May 22,2002; recorded in the official records of Collier County, Florida in O.R. Book 3060, Page 3120. THERE IS NO MONETARY CONSIDERATION FOR THIS DEED. Grantors reserve the right to reside in the real property placed in these Trusts, specifically the premises conveyed in this Warranty Deed, as their permanent residence during their lives. It is the intent of this provision to retain for the Grantors the requisite beneficial interest and possessor right in and to such real property to comply with Florida Statue 196.04 (2); with such interest being hereby declared to be the "equitable title to real estate," as that phrase is employed in Section 6, Article VII of the Constitution of the State of Florida. 9.B.e CL U M m c m E t U R r Q Packet Pg. 886 *** OR 4724 PG 2847 *** We are husband and wife, and we hereby release any rights of homestead or other rights, statutory or under common law, we might have in the subject premises. L.S. Witness to Both (Print name: 147R 1'rc`1q-'S ) Witness to Both (Print State of Florida Collier County, SS eeTi M. Tetrault 3 p [ i -Tft� C"V'>'-- L.S. THEN CAME, Robert L. Tetrault and Kathleen M. Tetrault,,personally known to me, or satisfactorily proven by a photo identification issued by a governmental agency, (specify ID) to be the individuals whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and they acknowledged that they executed the same for the purposes contained therein. BEFORE ME, Dated:46�44WI,'2011 Jotary Public PABFJ.A ANN NERNANDFZ �~ ' �•`v,.; mr ooa .1 siou aDDWM n. mu �• Packet Pg. 887 9.B.e Cn'ier county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) 0 PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) 00 S 9, T 50, R 26 m v co FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, orassociate with, legal description if more than one) a See attached list Y U STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 00 r 2303, 2380, 2401, 2402 and 2505 Sunset Blvd t • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of -way Q • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Russell Square Project name not approved at this time PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # Rev. 6/9/2017 1 Packet Pg. 888 9.B.e Cv e -r Courity COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Russell Square Please Return Approved Checklist By: 0 Email Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Phone: 239-947-1144 Email/Fax: sumpenhour(@aradvminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00407960002 , 00407520002 Folio Number 00407840009 Folio Number 00408360009 Folio Number 00408120003 Folio Number 00407720006 Folio Number 00408200004 Approved by:. Date: 1/10/2018 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 6/9/2017 1 Packet Pg. 889 SB 32 RPUD (PL20170004414) Parcel Number Owner 00407520002 Cross and Thompson LLC 00407720006 John D. Bruce 00407840009 Cross and Thompson LLC 00407960002 Cross and Thompson LLC 00408120003 Robert Tetrault Rev Trust & Kathleen M Tetrault Rev Trust 00408200004 Cross and Thompson LLC 00408360009 Cross and Thompson LLC January 9, 2018 Property Owner List.docx © GradyMinor Civil 6nglnecrs • Land 8urvcynrs • Planners • I andscape Amh%xts 9.B.e Page 1 of 1 Packet Pg. 890 32 Acre Santa Barbara Property 9.B.e E m L CO T CD 0 ti T 0 N J a N O a 00 w Iq 50- M m m r c m E z c� a © GradyMinor 370 185 0 370 Feet Civil Rngtnem • [,and Surveyors •Planners s Landscape Arch€torts Packet Pg. 891 INSTR 4613019 OR 4724 PG 2846 RECORDED 10/5/2011 11:41 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $18.50 Prepared by and return to: Robert L. Tetrault 2380 Sunset Boulevard Naples, FL 34112 Warranty Deed That on the 7 day of 2011, we: Robert L. Tetrault and Kathleen M. Tetrault, husband and wife, of 2380 Sunset Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34112, (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantors"), owners of the property hereinafter described, In exchange for valuable ownership of the subject An undivided fifty percent Tetrault Revocable Trust Da 34112, And An undivided fifty percent 0 Tetrault Revocable Trust Date 34112, (hereinafter referred to with warranty covenants, the acknowledged grant ;tee of the Robert L. Boulevard, Naples, Florida nterest to Kathletri M. a etra�&,Trustee of the Kathleen M. fem6er- 2"1 , 2011;'. $0 Sud s6t Boulevard, Naples, Florida "Grantees") 2, SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 48 OF ENCHANTING ACRES. SUBJECT to outstanding taxes, mortgages, restrictions, easements, or other conditions of record. Meaning and intending to convey that same parcel acquired by these grantors by Special Warranty Deed of CITIBANK dated May 22, 2002; recorded in the official records of Collier County, Florida in O.R. Book 3060, Page 3120. THERE IS NO MONETARY CONSIDERATION FOR THIS DEED. Grantors reserve the right to reside in the real property placed in these Trusts, specifically the premises conveyed in this Warranty Deed, as their permanent residence during their lives. It is the intent of this provision to retain for the Grantors the requisite beneficial interest and possessor right in and to such real property to comply with Florida Statue 196.04 (2); with such interest being hereby declared to be the "equitable title to real estate," as that phrase is employed in Section 6, Article VII of the Constitution of the State of Florida. 9.B.e CL U cc m r c m E t U R r Q Packet Pg. 892 *** OR 4724 PG 2847 *** We are husband and wife, and we hereby release any rights of homestead or other rights, statutory or under common law, we might have in the subject premises. (: � �' C �-� �J" a L.S. Witness to Both (Print name: I -) CI'/9 ZAVPS ) Witness to Both (Print State of Florida Collier County, SS J M. Tetrault L.S. THEN CAME, Robert L. Tetrault and Kathleen M. Tetrault, personally known to me, or satisfactorily proven by a photo identification issued by a governmental agency, (specify ID) to be the individuals whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and they acknowledged that they executed the same for the purposes contained therein. BEFORE ME, Dated: 4J,02011 9.B.e CL U M m r c as E t U R r r Q Packet Pg. 893 Notary Public t.3 HERNA1dDI•Z , � earcoar�nssioNa .,�. `" CL U M m r c as E t U R r r Q Packet Pg. 893 INSTR 4634950 OR 4743 PG 3398 RECORDED 12/8/2011 9:00 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $1,995.00 REC $18.50 CONS $285,000.00 r w, Prepared by: Bill AlcFarland, P.A. P.O. Box 101507 Cape Coral, Florida 33910 Parcel Identification Number: 00407720006 Above This Line For Recording Data) WARRANTY DEED This Warranty Deed made this 31' day of A/1-_' '2011, between Tarp Properties 42, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose post office address is 10954 Bonita Beach Road, Bonita Springs, FL 34135, hereinafter called the grantor, and John D. Bruce, a single man whose post office address is 2402 Sunset Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34112 called the grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees.) Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey, and confirm unto the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which grantor -has yinan¢ to &e fglIowing described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida to -wit:' tib Subject to all easements, restrictions, Together, with all the tenements, To Have and to Hold, the same in feet 5iml And, the grantor hereby covenants with has good right and lawful authority to se4e same against the lawful claims of all persdr subsequent to December 31, 2010. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: SEE ATTACHED EXMli r J81IESTEAD PROPERTY OFT] ations dfxecord:,, rand,otppgirteOan` e tlip et b longi f,. mtee that the grantor is l fully�sei onvey said land, and heft*''wat'•raf losnsoever; and that said land is',fre ,Q (Si haTilre of First Witness)' , 1 (Printed Na/me of First Witness (Signature of Second Witness) 4 (Printed Name of Second Witness) State of c7o County of in (tnywise appertaining. laid land in fee simple; that the grantor itle to said land and will defend the encumbrances, except taxes accruing year first above written. Tarp Properties #2, LLC, a F rida limited liabili ompam, By: Ba rey s m pager The foregoing instrument .was acknowledged before me this 3 o day of / � j � , 2011 by Barry Frey, as manager of Tarp Properties #2, LIC, a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the company who is personally known to me or has produced Le , C . ; as identification. (Notary Sea]) K R LOTIES My COMMISSION #EEf78g99 EXPIRES: August 23, 2015 Eended Thru Notary Pub'r. Und2mrfiers Signature of Notary Public/ Commission Exp: 9.B.e CL 7 U M m E t M a Packet Pg. 894 *** OR 4743 PG 3399 *** t EXHIBIT 'A' The following described real property situated in the City of Naples, County of Collier, and State of Florida, to wit: The North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, containing 5 acres, more or less. Less Road Easements on the West side of 30 -foot parcel also known Tract 49 Enchanted Acres. 0�� 2 9.B.e Packet Pg. 895 INSTR 5339208 OR 5337 PG 3607 RECORDED 11/30/2016 9:08 AM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA 9•B•e DOC@.70 $0.70 REC $27.00 Prepared by: Brian 0. Cross, Esq. Goede, Adamczyk, DeBoest & Cross PLLC 8950 Fontana Del Sol Way, Suite 100 Naples, Florida 34109 Parcel Identification No's. 00407520002/00407840009/00407960002/00408360009 Warranty Deed This Indenture made this (� day of V LX-341tlB, 2016 between C & T Properties a {� �� Unlimited, a Florida General Partnership, whose post office address is 3227 S. Horseshoe Drive, #100, Naples, FL 34104, grantor*, and Cross and Thompson, LLC, a Florida limited N liability company whose post office address is 6820 Daniels Road, Naples, Florida 34109 3 grantee*, -' �- � r Witnesseth that said grantor, ,Ifird in consideration o e sum of TEN AND NO/100 0 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other gotand valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by c said grantee, the receipt whereof ii hereby ackiiowledg0d, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs i/and i s f r :ver �l�7ng D escribed land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, FlOri� a, ,its � � � N Parcel A _ a The South One -Half (1/2) of the Southwest One Quter (1/4) of the Southwest One -Quarter of the Northwest One -Quarter (1 /4) of Section` 9, Township 50 South, Range v 26 East, Collier County, Florida, reserving therefrom the east thirty (30) feet for road right-of-way purposes only: ,,,, Parcel B m The North One -Half (1/2) of the Northwest One Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest One -Quarter of the Southwest One -Quarter (1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, reserving therefrom the east thirty (30) feet for road E right-of-way purposes only; also known as Tract 40 of unrecorded Plat. r r Q Parcel C The South One -Half (1/2) of the Northwest One Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest One -Quarter of the Southwest One -Quarter (1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Less 30 feet for casement on the South Line and 30 feet for easement on the east line for road right-of-way purposes only. Also known as Tract 39, enchanted acres, Collier County, Florida. Parcel D The North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, reserving therefrom the East 30 feet for road right of way containing 5 acres more or less; also described as Tract 42, Enchanted Acres. Packet Pg. 896 OR 5337 PG 3608 9.B.e and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise -@- appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. appertaining. a And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land — a� in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that y the grantor hereby fully warrants the title, to said land and will defend the same against the lawful 3 claims of all persons whomsoever, ard�that saiLind is free of all encumbrances, except taxes It accruing subsequent to December 31,'2016. The ownership structure of/drantor u _same as Grantee. Accordingly, only minimum o documentary stamps are due connection conveyance of the subject property. c V t I a N r f i..... , " OF PAGE INTEiVTIONALL'Y BLANK] IL 00 [REMAINi) R m r C d E L V R r r Q Packet Pg. 897 *** OR 5337 PG 3609 *** In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: C &T roperties Unlimited, a Florida t Gener artnership Witness Signa re: kail Print Name: t By: as Witness Signature: Print Name: 5u" f\ s�ZarA STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument v 2016 by , as Partnership, who [ is pe as identification. My Commission Expires: SS:, F z1Y ". IAURAE CIIAI # 61Y oDWISSION i FF 914189 EXPIRES: SeptWtw 19, 2019 d'+BarWRiuBudget NohrySartea 'FarY. day of K�01, , ilimited, a Florida General 1,1,/Q Mi 6z= ► 9.B.e Packet Pg. 898 INSTR 5352815 OR 5350 PG 994 RECORDED 1/4/2017 10:22 AM PAGES 4 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA 9•B•e DOC@.70 $280.00 REC $35.50 INDX $2.00 CONS $40,000.00 Prepared By and Return To: Kris Unkrich Focus Title Group, LLC 8950 Fontana Del Sol Way, Suite 100 Naples, Florida 34109 Tax Folio No. 00408200004 Consideration: $40,000.00 Warranty Deed This Indenture is made this day of December, 2016, by and between PAMELA JO MELLOTT A/K/A PAMELA JO MELLOTT JAMES, a = E. woman, and GARY DEWAYNE JAMES, a 5 v� %�ti man individually and as Co -Trustees of the PAMELA'S TRUST PURSUANT TO THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF C0 AL N. MELLOTT DATED 9-15-1995, whose post office address is 15 0 6-twA! 1/. 94tW K�( (Grantor*) and CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,. whose mailing address is 6820 Daniels Rd., Naples, FL 34109 ("Grantee*"). Witnesseth that said Grantor, fa d in cansi�Jion - of the sum of TEN AND NO/ 100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other `evaluable consid ratio s to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whe o hereby acknowledged;. has anted, bargained, and sold to the said Grantee, and Grant 's it� er, thfo Owing described land, situate, lying and being in Collier C u vitt, ; The South one -ha ( ) t�o east b ` -c a er (NE 1/4) of the o Northwest one -qua 1 the South` quarter (SW 1/4) of a Section 9, Townshi outh, Range 26 East, of 9r ounty, Florida, Less the West thirty (30') t hereof, to be used fob right-of-way purposes W only (Tract 50 of unre lat) 0. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise m appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. c m And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land E in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful a claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2016. The subject property is not Pamela Jo Mellott a/k/a Pamela Jo Mellott James' or Gary DeWayne James' homestead within the meaning of the Constitution of the State of Florida, nor is it contiguous to or part of Pamela Jo Mellott a/k/a Pamela Jo Mellott James' or Gary DeWayne James' homestead property. Pamela Jo Mellott a/k/a Pamela Jo Mellott James' homestead address is i So 'Fa r kw c!3 51- f. -e fi S 1� ef -z cl ,r/ , le -,e., f V e P" and Gary�eWayne James' homestead address s: 1,Yu a r Li --13S-ria . AT -A IVle-,- I * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. Packet Pg. 899 OR 5350 PG 995 In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: 9.B.e Pamela Je Mellott a/k/a Pamela Jo Mellott James and Gary DeWayne James, as Co - Trustees of the Pamela's Trust pursuant to the Last Will and - Testament of Ceteal N. Witness Signature: 4--S l7 + � Mellott Dated 9-15-1995 Print Name: Mi—tisre. S, 'Le:rKor-,e_ co By wa"I_l �Li41 y Witness Signature. 1 la J Mellott a/k/a ela Mellott Print Name: dividually and as Co -Trustee o 0 STATE OF �� N a COUNTY OF �a ) s N The foregoing ins t as acknowledged b' rem th' day of December, 2016, by a Pamela Jo Mellott a/k/a Paine ellott James, indi 1 Co -Trustee of the Pamela's Trust coo pursuant to the Last Will and Te m of Coteal N. Mello 9-15-1995, who[ ] is personally .,to known to me or who kj has producas identification. c. My commission expires: `� - [ rb - %D„�,�. M Print Name: Notary Public, State of rte+ [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] i'a WARRANTY DEED Packet Pg. 900 OR 5350 PG 996 Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Pamela Jo Mellott a/k/a Pamela Jo Mellott James and Gary DeWayne James, as Co - Trustees of the Pamela's Trust pursuant to the Last Will and Testament of Coteal N. Witness Signature: =-E�) t Mellott Dated 9-15-1995 Print Name: (`ne-1 5.5(zc')_ i ,--e. 9.B.e By: Witness Signa e. Gary DeWayne James, ndi du y and as Print Name: �r✓ a � vv�,, 01, V Co -Trustee co STATE OF )SS: ^� COUNTY OF The foregoing instrum nt as 4&knowledged be 'o me th Ga DeWayne James, indivi all o -T uhtee� ' the Gary Testament of Coteal N. Mellott to 9 1 - 9�5,F u � i P s produced aenti on. .' �tk r My commission expires: —1 Print Name: -- Notary Pub] WARRANTY DEED m 3 W 0 0 0 Tday of December, 2016, by ~ 0 T st pursuant to the Last Will and a X1nown to me or who ' [1 k� ] has Q D. 00 t -w-A LL, ry�:.0,iy", � to of % a M 00 a Packet Pg. 901 *** OR 5350 PG 997 *** EXHIBIT "A" The South one-half (S1/2) of the Northeast one-quarter (NE 1/4) of the Northwest one-quarter (NW 1/4) of the Southwest one-quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, Less the West thirty (30') feet thereof, to be used for road right-of-way purposes only (Tract 50 of unrecorded plat) I It AY 113 9.B.e Packet Pg. 902 0 Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Transaction Identification Data for reference only: GrayRobinson, P.A. 401 E. Jackson St., Suite 2700, Tampa, FL 33602 ALTA Universal ID: LOAN ID Number: Issuing Office File Number: 490154-62 Order No.: 6719489 Property Address: FL 2401 Sunset Blvd Naples, FL 34112 2505 Sunset Blvd Naples, FL 34112 2303 Sunset Blvd Naples, FL 34112 FL FL FL Revision Number: REVISION F (CAS) 2/5/2018 1 K 3 El Fidelity National Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE A AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION COMMITMENT Commitment Date: 01/09/2018 6:00 AM Policy or Policies to be issued: A. ALTA Owners 2006 with Florida Modifications Proposed Insured: Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC, a Florida limited liability company Proposed Amount of Insurance: $7,500,000.00 9.B.e The estate or interest in the Land described or referred to in this Commitment is (Identify estate covered, i.e., fee, leasehold, etc): Fee Simple Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in the land is at the Commitment Date vested in Cross and Thompson LLC, a Florida limited liability company, by virtue of Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 5337, Page 3607 and Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 5350, Page 994, public records of Collier County, Florida. (as to PARCELS A, B, C,Dand E) John D. Bruce, by virtue of Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 4743, Page 3398, public records of Collier County, Florida. (as to PARCEL F) Countersigned: BY: Authorized Officer or Agent This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - 1 of 12 Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II - Exceptions C165Co9 ALTA Commitment (8/1/2016) (with FL Modifications) Packet Pg. 903 Order Number: 6719 9.13.e 490 Robert L. Tetrault, Trustee of the Robert L. Tetrault Revocable Trust dated September 27, 2011, as to an undivided 50% interest and Kathleen M. Tetrault, Trustee of the Kathleen M. Tetrault Revocable Trust dated September 27, 2011, as to an undivided 50% interest; subject to a Life Estate in Robert L. Tetrault and Kathleen M. Tetrault, husband and wife, by virtue of Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 4724, Page 2846, public records of Collier County, Florida. (as to PARCEL G) Louis R. Smith and Leona E. Smith, also known as Leonia E. Smith, as Trustees under the Declaration of Trust dated April 3, 1990 as recorded in Official Records Book 1515, Page 961 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, as to PARCELS H (2), (3), (5) and (6), by virtue of the deed recorded in Official Records Book 2275, Page 285 (Note: The Official Records Book for said Trust Agreement should be 1517); and The Heirs and/or Devisees of the Estate of Beulah Jaquith, Deceased, as to PARCELS H (1) and (4). 5. The Land is described as follows in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made part hereof. CL U M m r c m E M U a r r Q Commitment Packet Pg. 904 9.B.e Order Number: 6719489 — Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 490154-62 SCHEDULE B SECTION I REQUIREMENTS AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION COMMITMENT The following are requirements must be met: 1. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. 2. Instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and filed for record: A. Duly executed Warranty Deed from CROSS AND THOMPSON LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Grantor, to NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Grantee, conveying the land described on Schedule A hereof. (as to PARCELS A, B, C, D, and E) a The Company will require the following as to Cross and Thompson LLC., a Florida limited liability m company: ("LLC"): i. Proof that the LLC was in existence in its state of organization at the time it acquired title and that the LLC is currently in good standing. ii. Present for review a true and complete copy of the articles of organization and operating 0 0 ti agreement of the LLC and any amendments thereto. N J iii. Record an affidavit from the person executing the proposed deed on behalf of the LLC certifying: N (a) the name and state of organization of the LLC; (b) whether the LLC is member -managed or manager -managed; (c) the identity of the member or manager and the person authorized to a execute the deed; and (d) neither the LLC nor any member signing the deed have filed bankruptcy 00 since the LLC acquired title. co iv. If the member or manager of the LLC is also a business entity, present proof of the entity's 3 good standing and the appropriate entity documents to establish signing authority. U m If the proposed deed will be executed by anyone other than a member or manager, those portions of the operating agreement or other documentation evidencing the authority of the signatory must E be attached as an exhibit to the affidavit. E B. Duly executed Warranty Deed from JOHN D. BRUCE, Grantor, to NEAL COMMUNITIES OF Q SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Grantee, conveying the land described on Schedule A hereof. (as to PARCEL F) NOTE: Spouse(s) of individual(s), if any, are required to join in the execution of the above required instruments in the event the land is the homestead of the grantor. In addition, confirmation of marital status and non -homestead, where applicable, of grantor(s) must be reflected on the instrument vesting the estate to be insured. C. Duly executed Warranty Deed from ROBERT L. TETRAULT and KATHLEEN M. TETRAULT, husband and wife; ROBERT L. TETRAULT, as Trustee of the ROBERT L. TETRAULT REVOCABLE TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 27, 2011; and from KATHLEEN M. TETRAULT, as Trustee of the KATHLEEN M. TETRAULT REVOCABLE TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 27, 2011, Grantor, to NEAL COMMUNITIES OF This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; and 3 of 12 Schedule B, Part II - Exceptions C156C09 ALTA Commitment (8/1/2016) (with FL Modifications) Packet Pg. 905 Order Number: 69.B.e Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 490 SCHEDULE B SECTION I Requirements continued SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Grantee, conveying the land described on Schedule A hereof. (as to PARCEL G) D. Record a non -appealable Final Judgment quieting the title to PARCEL H in NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, as Plaintiff, to confirm the interests held by the following parties have been properly eliminated and title to said PARCEL is held by said Plaintiff; or in lieu thereof, Quit Claim Deeds from the following parties to NEAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida limited liability company: 1) JOHN FLICK and LAURA FLICK, husband and wife, as to any interest they may claim by virtue of the Deed recorded in Official Records Book 1968, Page 287, in and to PARCELS H (2), (3), (5) and (6). (Note: PARCEL G in said deed was conveyed by Deed in Official Records Book 2497, Page 3279) a 2) LOUIS R. SMITH and LEONIA E. SMITH, also known as LEONA E. SMITH, husband and wife, m individually and as Trustees under the DECLARATION OF TRUST DATED APRIL 3, 1990, AS y RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1515, PAGE 961 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (Note: The correct Official Records Book for the Trust is 1517), as to any interest they may claim by virtue of the Deed recorded in Official Records Book 2275, Page 285; 3) GEORGE P. LANGFORD, as Trustee of the LEROY H. HUENEFELD, JR. LAND TRUST DATED 0 0 ti SEPTEMBER 6, 1996 (RESTATED HUENEFELD TRUST AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 28, 1989), as to 0 any interest claimed by virtue of the Deed recorded in Official Records Book 2275, Page 289; a 4) THE HEIRS AND/OR DEVISEES OF THE ESTATE OF BEULAH E. JAQUITH, DECEASED; naming N and serving MARY E. BROWN, VIRGINIA JAQUITH, ANN L. ABEL and JAN E. STOKES, as known a beneficiaries of the estate and naming and serving class of unknown heirs of said Estate with AD eo LITEM being appointed to represent class of unknowns, resulting in a Final Judgment quieting title v against all known heirs and class of unknowns, as to any interest they may claim by virtue of the Deed recorded in Official Records Book 110, Page 62. a U NOTE: A certified copy of the Death Certificate of Beulah E. Jaquith, deceased, was recorded in m Official Records Book 2566, Page 2582; a certified copy of an unacknowledged Last Will and Testament by Beulah E. Jaquith was recorded in Official Records Book 2566, Page 2584; a certified copy of the Death Certificate of Charles E. Jaquith was recorded in Official Records Book 2566, E Page 2578; and a certified copy of an unacknowledged Last Will and Testament of Charles R. Jaquith was recorded in Official Records Book 2566, Page 2580; we find no probate proceedings of Q record. 5) Intentionally deleted. 3. Record a Certification of Trust for the Robert L. Tetrault Revocable Trust dated September 27, 2011 and the Kathleen M. Tetrault Revocable Trust dated September 27, 2011, meeting the requirements of Section 736.1017, Florida Statutes, executed by the current trustee. The Certification of Trust shall contain the following: A. A statement confirming the existence of the trust and its execution date. B. Identity of the settlor. C. The identity and address of the currently acting trustee. D. The trustee's powers. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; and 4 of 12 Schedule B, Part 11 - Exceptions C165C09 ALTA Commitment (8/1/2016) (with FL Modifications) Packet Pg. 906 0 Fidelity National Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE B SECTION I Requirements continued Order Number: 69.B.e 490 E. The revocability or irrevocability of the trust and the identity of any person holding a power to revoke the trust. F. The authority of co -trustees to sign or otherwise authenticate and whether all or less than all are required in order to exercise powers of the trustee. G. The manner of taking title to trust property. H. The certification must state the trust has not been revoked, modified, or amended in any manner that would cause the representations contained in the certification of trust to be incorrect. Note: 1. If the current trustee(s) is not named as trustee(s) on the vesting deed, the pertinent pages of the trust and such other supporting documentation as is necessary to establish the successor trustee's authority must be attached as an exhibit. 2. If the settlor of a revocable trust is deceased and the property was his/her homestead, the Certification of Trust must recite that he/she was not survived by a spouse or minor child. Or, if a deceased settlor is survived by a spouse or minor child, please contact the underwriting department for additional requirements. 4. Proof of payment of any outstanding assessments in favor of Collier County, Florida, any special taxing district and any municipality. NOTE: If this requirement is not satisfied the following exception will appear on Schedule B: Any outstanding assessments in favor of Collier County, Florida, any special taxing district and any municipality. 5. Proof of payment of service charges for water, sewer, waste and gas, if any, through the date of closing. NOTE: If this requirement is not met the following exception will appear on Schedule B: Any lien provided for by Florida Statutes in favor of any city, town, village or port authority for unpaid service charges for service by any water, sewer, waste or gas system supplying the insured land or service facilities. 6. Satisfaction and production of the canceled notes of that certain Mortgage from John D. Bruce in favor of MERS, as nominee for Angel Oak Mortgage Solutions LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dated March 8, 2016, recorded March 17, 2016 in Official Records Book 5251, Page 3693. (as to PARCEL F) 7. Satisfaction and production of the canceled notes of that certain Mortgage executed by Robert L. Tetrault and Kathleen M. Tetrault, his wife, to Washington Mutual Bank dated September 19, 2003, recorded October 9, 2003 in Official Records Book 3418, Page 177. (as to PARCEL G) 8. Satisfaction and production of the canceled notes of that certain Mortgage from Robert Tetrault and Kathleen Tetrault, his wife, to Third Federal Savings and Loan Association of Cleveland dated December 3, 2003, recorded December 13, 2003 in Official Records Book 3463, Page 405, as modified by Loan Modification Agreement recorded May 13, 2014 in Official Records Book 5036, Page 3656. (as to PARCEL G) 9. Release and termination of the lien and option to purchase described in Notice of Interest in Real Property recorded November 14, 2016 in Official Records Book 5333, Page 1234 from Robert L. Tetrault, individually and as Trustee of the Robert L. Tetrault Revocable Trust dated September 27, This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; and Schedule B, Part 11 - Exceptions C165C09 ALTA Commitment (8/1/2016) (with FL Modifications) 5of12 m a m N 7 v 0 0 0 ti 0 N J IL N D IL 00 W v co a U M m r c m E U R r r Q Packet Pg. 907 Order Number: 69.B.e Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 490 SCHEDULE B SECTION I Requirements continued 2011, Kathleen M. Tetrault, individually and as Trustee of the Kathleen M. Tetrault Revocable Trust dated September 27, 2011, and Cross and Thompson, LLC, a Florida limited liability company. (as to PARCEL G) 10. Issuing agent must obtain from the Company or perform themselves a title update three (3) business days prior to closing, to verify that no adverse matters or defects appear in the public records. 11. An Affidavit in form acceptable to Fidelity National Title Insurance Company ("Company") and executed by or on behalf of the current record owner(s) of the subject property stating that: (A) there are no parties in possession of the subject property other than said current record owner(s); (B) there are no encumbrances upon the subject property other than as may be set forth in this Commitment; (C) there are no unrecorded assessments which are due and payable and; (D) there have been no improvements made to or upon the subject property within the last ninety (90) day period for which a there remain any outstanding and unpaid bills for labor, materials or supplies for which a lien or liens cn may be claimed must be furnished to the Company, or, in lieu thereof, an exception to those matters set forth in said Affidavit which are inconsistent with or deviate from the foregoing requirements will y appear in the policy or policies to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. 12. Intentionally deleted. 13. Intentionally deleted. 0 0 ti 14. Secure, for the file of the Company, an Affidavit from ROBERT L. TETRAULT and KATHLEEN M. 0 � TETRAULT, husband and wife; ROBERT L. TETRAULT, as Trustee of the ROBERT L. TETRAULT a N REVOCABLE TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 27, 2011; and from KATHLEEN M. TETRAULT, as Trustee of the KATHLEEN M. TETRAULT REVOCABLE TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 27, 2011, current owners of PARCEL a G, to certify that they have not received any claims or demands for payment of the Mortgage from eo John Flick and Laura Flick, husband and wife, in favor of Fifth Third Bank of Florida in the original v principal amount of $80,000.00, recorded March 10, 1998 in Official Records Book 2396, Page 1548; nor have said owners entered into any mortgage modification or assumption agreement regarding the 3 said mortgage. Y U cc m 15. Intentionally deleted. c as NOTE: 2017 Real Property Taxes in the gross amount of $33.69 are paid. Homestead Exemption: N/A. E Tax Parcel Number: 00407840009, as to PARCEL A and PARCEL H (1). r r Q NOTE: 2017 Real Property Taxes in the gross amount of $35.18 are paid. Homestead Exemption: N/A. Tax Parcel Number: 00407960002, as to PARCEL B and PARCEL H (2). NOTE: 2017 Real Property Taxes in the gross amount of $33.43 are paid. Homestead Exemption: N/A. Tax Parcel Number: 00407520002, as to PARCEL C and PARCEL H (3). NOTE: 2017 Real Property Taxes in the gross amount of $33.69 are paid. Homestead Exemption: N/A. Tax Parcel Number: 00408360009, as to PARCEL D and PARCEL H (4). NOTE: 2017 Real Property Taxes in the gross amount of $2,578.59 are paid. Homestead Exemption: N/A. Tax Parcel Number: 00408200004, as to PARCEL E and PARCEL H (5). This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; and 6 of 12 Schedule B, Part 11 - Exceptions C165C09 ALTA Commitment (8/1/2016) (with FL Modifications) Packet Pg. 908 Order Number: 69.B.e Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 490 SCHEDULE B SECTION I Requirements continued NOTE: 2017 Real Property Taxes in the gross amount of $3,046.83 are paid. Homestead Exemption: N/A. Tax Parcel Number: 00407720006, as to PARCEL F and PARCEL H (6). NOTE: 2017 Real Property Taxes in the gross amount of $3,266.48 are paid. Homestead Exemption: N/A. Tax Parcel Number: 00408120003, as to PARCEL G. END OF SCHEDULE B SECTION I This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; and Schedule B, Part 11 - Exceptions C165C09 ALTA Commitment (8/1/2016) (with FL Modifications) r Q 7of12 Packet Pg. 909 9.B.e Order No.: 6719489 — = Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 490154-62 SCHEDULE B SECTION II EXCEPTIONS AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION COMMITMENT THIS COMMITMENT DOES NOT REPUBLISH ANY COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION CONTAINED IN ANY DOCUMENT REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SPECIFIC COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION VIOLATES STATE OR FEDERAL LAW BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. The Policy will not insure against loss or damage resulting from the terms and provisions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and will include the following Exceptions unless cleared to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the m public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this N _ Commitment. 2. Taxes and assessments for the year 2018 and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. N 7 3. Standard Exceptions: v c A. Intentionally deleted. 0 0 B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 0 N a N C. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or materials heretofore or hereafter furnished, a imposed by law and not shown by the public records. D. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens in the public records. 00 W Iq 4. Intentionally deleted. CL Y U 5. Intentionally deleted. m r c 6. Collier County Ordinance Number 75-20 regulating the installation of any water distribution and E E wastewater collection system or part thereof within any public right-of-way or easement, recorded in Official Records Book 619, Pages 1177. r Q 7. Intentionally deleted. 8. Intentionally deleted. 9. Intentionally deleted. 10. Intentionally deleted. 11. Intentionally deleted. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; and 8 of 12 Schedule B, Part 11 - Exceptions C165C09 ALTA Commitment (8/1/2016) (with FL Modifications) Packet Pg. 910 9.B.e Order No.: 6719489 — = Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 490154-62 SCHEDULE B SECTION II EXCEPTIONS AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION COMMITMENT 12. Subject land lies within the boundaries for solid waste collection, Collier County, and will be subject to future assessments by Collier County. 13. Intentionally deleted. 14. Intentionally deleted. 15. Intentionally deleted. 16. Intentionally deleted. 17. Intentionally deleted. 18. Intentionally deleted. 19. Intentionally deleted. 20. Subject to that certain Easement granted to Florida Power and Light Company recorded in Official Records Book 1087, Page 2237. (as to PARCELS F and H (6) ) 21. Notwithstanding the insuring provisions, this policy does not insure any right of access to and from the land. (as to PARCELS E, F, G and H) NOTE: Upon acquisition of all insured Parcels by the Insured, access to and from said Parcels will be over and across the commonly owned PARCELS A, B, C, and D, and exception will be revised accordingly. 22. Matters disclosed by the Survey prepared by Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., as File No. 17-107- co ALTA.DWG, dated December 15, 2017, as last revised January 23, 2018, to -wit: a a) Possible unrecorded easements regarding several wood utility poles with guy anchors located outside Y of recorded easement area, Cable Television Riser Box and Telephone Riser/Box; and c b) Possible fence encroachments. 00 c NOTES ON STANDARD EXCEPTIONS: E Item 3A will be deleted from the policy(ies) upon receipt of an accurate survey of the Land acceptable to the r Company. Exception will be made for any encroachment, setback line violation, overlap, boundary line Q dispute or other adverse matter disclosed by the survey. Items 3B, 3C, and 3D will be deleted from the policy(ies) upon receipt of an affidavit acceptable to the Company, affirming that, except as disclosed therein (i) no parties in possession of the Land exist other than the record owner(s); (ii) no improvements have been made to the Land within 90 days prior to closing which have not have been paid for in full; and (iii) no unpaid taxes or assessments are against the Land which are not shown as existing liens in the public records. Exception will be made for matters disclosed in the affidavit. NOTE: All recording references in this commitment/policy shall refer to the public records of Collier County, Florida, unless otherwise noted. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; and 9 of 12 Schedule B, Part 11 - Exceptions C165C09 ALTA Commitment (8/1/2016) (with FL Modifications) Packet Pg. 911 9.B.e Order No.: 6719489 — = Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 490154-62 SCHEDULE B SECTION II EXCEPTIONS AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION COMMITMENT NOTE: In accordance with Florida Statutes section 627.4131, please be advised that the insured hereunder may present inquiries, obtain information about coverage, or receive assistance in resolving complaints, by contacting Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, 5690 West Cypress Street, Suite A , Tampa, FL 33607; Telephone 866-632-6200. Searched By: Jim Yeakley, Commercial Title Examiner; Jim.Yeakley@fnf.com END OF SCHEDULE B SECTION II This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements; and 10 of 12 Schedule B, Part 11 - Exceptions C165C09 ALTA Commitment (8/1/2016) (with FL Modifications) Packet Pg. 912 Fidelity National Title Insurance Company EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL A: The South One -Half (1/2) of the Southwest One Quarter (1/4) of the Southwest One -Quarter of the Northwest One -Quarter (1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, reserving therefrom the east thirty (30) feet for road right-of-way purposes only. PARCEL B: The North One -Half (1/2) of the Northwest One Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest One -Quarter of the Southwest One -Quarter (1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, reserving therefrom the east thirty (30) feet for road right-of-way purposes only; also known as Tract 40 of unrecorded Plat. PARCEL C: The South One -Half (1/2) of the Northwest One Quarter (1/4) of the Northwest One -Quarter of the Southwest One -Quarter (1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Less 30 feet for easement on the South Line and 30 feet for easement on the east line for road right-of-way purposes only. Also known as Tract 39, enchanted acres, Collier County, Florida. PARCEL D: The North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, reserving therefrom the East 30 feet for road right of way; also described as Tract 42, Enchanted Acres. AND ALSO LESS that portion of said PARCELS A, B, C and D, taken by eminent domain proceeding between Collier County, Florida and C&T Properties Unlimited as evidenced by Order of Taking recorded March 10, 2008 in Official Records Book 4337, Page 541, Case Number 07 -4923 -CA referenced to as Parcel 126FEE and being more particularly described as: A parcel of land lying in the Southwest and Northwest quarters of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the West quarter corner of said Section 9; thence South 00050'29" East along the West line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 9 a distance of 653.41 feet to an intersection with the Northerly right-of-way line of Cope Lane; thence South 89057'32" East along said Northerly right-of-way line, a distance of 38.83 feet; thence leaving said Northerly right-of-way line North 07021'18" East, a distance of 207.06 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Westerly and having a radius of 3,100.00 feet; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 08120'02" an arc distance of 450.91 feet to an intersection with the North line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 9; thence North 00058'38" West, a distance of 685.18 feet to an intersection with the Northerly line of a parcel of land as described in O.R. 3283, Page 524, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence South 89039'02" West along said Northerly line, a distance of 100.01 feet to an intersection with the West line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 9; thence South 00058'38" East along said West line, a distance of 686.37 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described. PARCEL E: This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 11 of 12 B, Part I - Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II - Exceptions C165C09 ALTA Commitment (8/1/2016) (with FL Modifications) CL U M m r c m E U a r r Q Packet Pg. 913 Order No.: 6719489 490154-62 Exhibit "A" continued The South one-half (S 1/2) of the Northeast one-quarter (NE 1/4) of the Northwest one-quarter (NW 1/4) of the Southwest one-quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, Less the West thirty (30') feet thereof, to be used for road right-of-way purposes only (Tract 50 of unrecorded plat) PARCEL F: The North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Less Road Easements on the West side of 30 -foot parcel also known as Tract 49 Enchanted Acres. PARCEL G: South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, and also known as Lot 48 of Enchanting Acres. PARCEL H: (1) The East 30 feet of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; (2) The East 30 feet of the North 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; (3) The East 30 feet of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; Less the South 30 feet thereof conveyed to Collier County, Florida, by Deeds recorded in Official Records Book 1091, Pages 1110 and 1119, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; (4) The East 30 feet of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; (5) The West 30 feet of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest a 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and m (6) The West 30 feet of the North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. m E R r r Q Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Commitment (6-17-06) Page 12 of 1 Packet Pg. 914 QUIT CLAIM DEED 2140915 OR: 2275 PG: 4285 11COl01D in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLi1R CUM, FL 01123197 at a9 96AI DVIU? 1. IIOCI, CL1I1 RIC Fla 19.50 j�j � 1101111C 1.0D Executed this ., jY day 001 'tn.Lc i_ DOC -.77 .70 , 1995, by LEROY H. HUENEFELD, JR Itte: and LOUISE HUENEFELD, Husband and Wife, CHH P L"001D and FIRST SECURITY BANK OF NEW 1W TAxIARI TR A MEXICO, as Trustee for LeRoy H. Huenefeld, Jr. I0115 1L 31103 and Louise Huenefeld, Trust Account Number formerly known as THE FIRST "M BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE, Successor Trustee to the FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF TOLEDO under Trust Number 16 LT sho known as LT 50-Uai-321, First Party, whose post oMce address is. P.O. Box 1305, Albuquerque. NM E7111, to IAULS R. SMITH and LEONA E. SMITH, as Trustees under declaration or Trust dated April 3, 1990 as recorded in 0. R. Book 1'515 at Page 961 or the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, whose -nailinrT address is Route 2 Box 410!1, Tigiiall, rA 30659 WITNESSETH, that the said First Parry, for acid W conslderttion or the sum or TEN DOLLARS (SIt3.00) in hand paid by the said Second Parry, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remiss, release andquit-plaim unto the said Second Party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim #n dfw&ad___ � ' he said First Party bas to sod in the described following lot, piece lot **Vief land,-ilt :IyIng and being in the County of Collier, State of Florida, to The Granteeffrun and to sell or lenge, or to described herein, pursue provisions of F.%639,?71� to protect, conserve, of the real property The intent of this decdo G(lnrey to the Graute�jr4i�"t any of the Grantors may have in strips of land thirty fet�()PAP width whigh-**y have been reserved or otherwise excluded from Various deeds exeeuW,' i C ed'a _ t e past concerning lands located in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 2i t,= 1itr County, Florida. TO HAVE AND TO BOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever or the said First Party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoorof the said Second Party forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said First Party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered In the presence of: t s o1 Printed Name of Witness /Witness 102 Printed Name of Witness LEROY H. H UEN EFE LD, JR. 9.B.e r Q Packet Pg. 915 Witness NI Ka'vti„ S . r—G "' Printed Name of Witness itness #2 �A i– E 7 111 . C= C I C' f�'S C, k Printed Name of Witness STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER OR: 2275 PG: 0286 LOUISE HUENEFELD The foregoingin:t meat was acknowledged before me this I�.day of 199?by LEROY H. HUENEFELD, JR. and LOUISE HUENEFELD, o are pe nall�r known to we or produced as identification. b hoomm bpim. (SEAL.) i� [nets 17r r -L N.4 nl Print me�of Witness4;:�) �(- _ Y.c Witness k2 II Printed Namdof Witness STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF 1r Notary Public) `lti}IR SitITY BANK OF NEW hh` enat" for LeRoy H. I�1id Louise Hueaefeld, Tit +uat Number 110031900 tlmowa as THE FIRST NAL BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE, Successor Trustee to the FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF TOLEDO u"r Trust Number 16LT ./V& LT -60.08_03 r By: 7-n S Its �/,'c c" � �� /•�j" be foregoing Instrument was acknowlecigpd before we this-� V day of ,1996 by IVM �n y 1'ce, president of and on behalf of FIRST SECURITY BANK OF NEW MEXICO, as rustee who Is personally known to we or 9.B.e Q Packet Pg. 916 9.B.e OR: 2275 PG: 0287 produced N� �" u identification. fa b■dnfM 6�ier: 6�F� ..Gti tG(LCca lYrARY PUaLiC (SEAL) (Printed Nome of Notmy Public) C0:6�y CL U m m a� E U a Q 0 Packet Pg. 917 N.' �; •.. (-rr'-IAL SEAL )NALD FENNEMA NorAHV PUBLIC STATE OF NEW MEXICO TIUI�etruareat prepared by: ' Nonny Bond Flied wm Socrowy o SUN ir,c;'b Mb C*mm"ion Erpnde IM Coor=s P. LoEford Attoresy at Law 3157 Tamlaml Tray North Naples, Florida 34103 C0:6�y CL U m m a� E U a Q 0 Packet Pg. 917 *** OR: 2215 PG: 0288 t** EXHIBIT "A" The following parcel of land located in Section 9, Township SO South, Range 26 East, Collier County, FWrida, to wit: 1. East 30 feet of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, 2. East 30 feet of the S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1N of the NW 1/4, 3. West 30 feet of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, 4. West 30 feet of the S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4, S. North 30 feet of the SW IN of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, and 6. South 30 feet of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4. ,VV, C LL 9.B.e Packet Pg. 918 y&Imm,x'.:ma -.w nz w K mmaa, o< w,ax�rni a x nava x rzmv � „ve n , m� maK reap arms � lwl axrenavno-anwmmvae um 8 v rmn — ,., 'Iy• _--- --- — --- —___ ___ --- F r�zu %emr�rore�i,x mu Z3 n r. ao>• a N89°5T3T'W 853.83' __ V fn —11gUloT 2: VI axmm�R/I R R e an9 II Wym m —_ __—___— �0 $ ___—___—___—___—eir'ro—___—_ a ,� rw 2n � nZZ �izfvt®; aos�tlsi75 7I n 9 rn_sar 9 .pmn ___— 16 :sem _ xaa ,e mn nmcws v rff' u�avam�x rtn wariw,m,us N I arm a rcx crmn ,-u-re 16 M1lmor antl 8s cRy omate& 380U Via Del Rey N°45'14°E 664.16' Fnn Bovita Sprimga, -Nd, 541:1A OBO SCHLE DE _ ax r m�4 pis, aTE ,wx ww/ m,mx `�m"`.mu` vxw CiNI Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Landscape ArchlLects o „mu"„ „� � � carr. ut_wm. as nnnsisi runt. nlnuta La niroslsl Buamoea LC znnnnees !? .-....... '^^ '^'^a amx wncx ww a,ae m ®%+a ww °"+'f °'e"e'n'^s ®� xm "' Bonita SDrines: 239.847.1144 rvw,Gaa/vmi—.,o. Fort My— 239.690.4380 sBssT. t m t ' saxv yrJ fln `''.sass wu, POB mm w J- as ,ry x nrr — ----------- '— aa'- n,—mer J; aawu mmw, m 9kgpm- s, s VININITY MAP NOT TO S E 9.B.e PROPERTY DESCRIPTION -.w nz w K mmaa, o< w,ax�rni a x nava x rzmv � „ve n , m� maK reap arms � lwl axrenavno-anwmmvae um aaxm�N � �otiw naxa w,: am mx.e an (Z° as re« �.mm nvm n ��.m m'0irw/, a xiww,� a x rnwm rry rc mwrIXs, curse v rmn — ,., �.� ams wm ,.'w ai «n N ®oa,z•,,,m...�.a��«,aa �=AZ r�zu %emr�rore�i,x mu Z3 n r. ao>• a N89°5T3T'W 853.83' __ V fn —11gUloT 2: VI axmm�R/I R R e 9�u �rmamJ� i m —_ __—___— �0 $ ___—___—___—___—eir'ro—___—_ m 9kgpm- s, s VININITY MAP NOT TO S E 9.B.e PROPERTY DESCRIPTION -.w nz w K mmaa, o< w,ax�rni a x nava x rzmv � „ve n , m� maK reap arms � lwl axrenavno-anwmmvae um aaxm�N � �otiw naxa w,: am mx.e an (Z° as re« �.mm nvm n ��.m m'0irw/, a xiww,� a x rnwm rry rc mwrIXs, curse mx ,., �.� ams wm ,.'w ai «n N ®oa,z•,,,m...�.a��«,aa �=AZ r�zu %emr�rore�i,x mu Z3 n r. ao>• a N89°5T3T'W 853.83' __ V fn —11gUloT 2: VI axmm�R/I ro. 3nuMs �u 00"5026"W N 30.00 � m —_ __—___— �0 $ ___—___—___—___—eir'ro—___—_ a ,� rw 2n � nZZ �izfvt®; aos�tlsi75 mwxx_,--- ___—___ ��_ 9 rn_sar 9 .pmn ___— 16 :sem _ xaa ,e mn nmcws v rff' u�avam�x rtn wariw,m,us arm a rcx crmn ,-u-re 16 M1lmor antl 8s cRy omate& 380U Via Del Rey SCALE: 1" = B0' tso n�u'ry m.eommm, xre'"m rl` m� murre�n�N m ^r mmxs„ry a x rwncv r O •amv maewwwm aven'aTwwm,�mre o x rwnnr h o x mwxo, Q rax azvrwoucnax xuwxe _ rswo-v x wuv aarm MI Z ra. rms r,ro xm nx = r amxmm� mwm,rva� m. r N yimmM 7- �mrm mere '�',w rr rar.w V a M su.m t J N 0 NOTE .�m u�.mmn .a,re•mmnveexma..e-r ra mm, ,,,rao<mm. a sass Mz) aura MI #a «> .nz «> a fia • "T' co.ram.x.m®,wmm. U•" rs aao atwn�a an as _ «n «°a1"�8^'0,. �' «moss 9m.m 6�e rmi ma x.,w.rsoaraa.ormuwm«armaru.. � ,e n -,mm --- ___T—__ —wb—�— a § ib g mg.a�mmwram,ar �,w wx,w un.,m amr .w xmm.'xmrcre war.a � SCHEDULE B -II EXCEPTIONS axe am�x, mama (,� �pS ,,.i mwa rvsl de'avwaur mro a,amr 2cs swan ma msm xma marem, _ r n„' +a, +,n �n n' � wm mw, ur mtt mxrta .vo mu sa rc a rmea reau www, a I k a rw,mnr mome enc .sxv¢ mrv; rm a u ruev +,a « vxm�,a '� -5 � r®an r.. xn xmw rmnem mso. m�mm'ssxn au.mwa.ox wm.ma aam farms xm maaw mr m, wann.m xasosasrs M i F kR ¢ Lil % § °�"` w ,,,�.,. mn � Y c 2 H ams.,mia,ra�r.ao;m anwi� G uuia z o ax CERTIFIED TO ,., 92' 614. ai «n N c nu 33 a r�zu %emr�rore�i,x mu ® �,mr.xrr�aj n r. ao>• a N89°5T3T'W 853.83' __ V nY— ~ a msfrepg Na„ uv r5'3 ,'y x n 8 '�9 a — — — � r • — .0 — tx,.a y ro. 3nuMs �u 00"5026"W N 30.00 Wm ) ak ae zm,�__ LEGEND 17 i6� —_ __—___— �0 $ ___—___—___—___—eir'ro—___—_ ___—___ msn __—_ -- .,m------- mwxx_,--- ___—___ ��_ 9 rn_sar 9 .pmn ___— 16 :sem an `m p°vzsrorv: xeattn mm. xtwty vu rsw ,m[ mwuruon adovm we,urm.wo „rss iGralyMinor OCratly rcx crmn ,-u-re 16 M1lmor antl 8s cRy omate& 380U Via Del Rey weir Bovita Sprimga, -Nd, 541:1A OBO SCHLE DE _ ax r m�4 pis, aTE ,wx ww/ m,mx `�m"`.mu` vxw CiNI Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Landscape ArchlLects o „mu"„ „� � � carr. ut_wm. as nnnsisi runt. nlnuta La niroslsl Buamoea LC znnnnees !? .-....... '^^ '^'^a amx wncx ww a,ae m ®%+a ww °"+'f °'e"e'n'^s ®� xm "' Bonita SDrines: 239.847.1144 rvw,Gaa/vmi—.,o. Fort My— 239.690.4380 sBssT. t m t A PARCEL OF LAND —Al LYING IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST $ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Packet P9. 919 CERTIFIED TO �aumn wama� y"! Y Q 4 m. mro os xm w,us nus A ,. =U mLOr 4 r r .m mm 33 a r�zu %emr�rore�i,x mu ww R ALTA/ASPS LAND TITLE SURVEY A PARCEL OF LAND —Al LYING IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST $ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Packet P9. 919 _ a —"NW C Russell Square RPUD Location Map 9.B.e W---!; E © GradyMinor Civil Pngtnecrs • Land Surveyors • Planners 1 Landscape Archlw s r :-t { 4. A �. !I1 Packet Pg. 920 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT RUSSELL SQUARE AMENDED JULY 109 2018 Prepared by: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34104 I 9.B.e I CL m m E a a Packet Pg. 921 Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................. 2.0 WETLAND JURISDICTION AND PERMITTING HISTORY OVERVIEW 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS (PRE -DEVELOPMENT) .............................. 3 1 VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS 2 3 4 4 ............................................................................................................. 3.2 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS..........................................................................................6 3.3 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS............................................................................................6 3.4 NATIVE HABITAT................................................................................................................................. 7 3.5 LISTED PLANT & ANIMAL SPECIES.....................................................................................................10 3.6 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES....................................................................................11 3.7 SOILS..................................................................................................................................................11 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS (POST-DEVELOPMENT)...........................................................................15 4.1 PROPOSED PROJECT........................................................................................................................15 4.2 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS..................................................................................................16 4.3 PRESERVATION OF WETLANDS, OTHER SURFACE WATERS, AND UPLANDS..................................17 4.4 PROJECT IMPACTS TO LISTED SPECIES............................................................................................17 4.5 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL RESOURCES..............................................20 5.0 AVOIDANCE & MINIMIZATION OF WETLAND IMPACTS.................................................................21 6.0 PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH CCME...............................................................................................22 I 9.B.e I r Q Packet Pg. 922 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement Julv 2018 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Russell Square project site is approximately 32.89 acres located in eastern Collier County, east of Santa Barbara Blvd and south of Davis Blvd. The property is located within Sections 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The project site is made up of seven smaller parcels individually identified as folio numbers 00407520002, 00407960002, 00407840009, 00408360009, 00408120003, 00407720006, and 00408200004 by the Collier County property appraiser's office. Access to the project is via Santa Barbara Blvd on the west boundary and from Sunset Blvd into the south boundary. A general location map is provided in the included exhibits. The 4 westernmost parcels have been used in the past as pasture lands and also had a single- family residence until it was removed in 2003. Two of the eastern parcels contain existing single- family residences and have had horses in the past. The final parcel in the south east is undeveloped and forested. There is a mix of developed and undeveloped residential parcels to the east and south of the project site. Santa Barbara Blvd lies immediately to the west with higher density residential development to the northwest and southwest. A majority of the site has been cleared and maintained clear for the agricultural and single family uses. The remaining undeveloped areas are infested to varying degrees by exotic vegetation including melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. The project site contains about 27.03 acres of upland habitats (82% of the project area) and 5.50 acres of wetland habitats (17% of the project area) as well as 0.36 acre of other surface waters (0 SW) (1% of the project area). The proposed project is occurring on a site which has been impacted by agricultural and construction activities. The proposed development does impact jurisdictional wetlands, though these impacts have been minimized to isolated wetlands that are not jurisdictional to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The wetlands proposed to be impacted are isolated, relatively low functioning wetlands due to surrounding development and exotic vegetation infestation. A wetland enhancement program is proposed which will improve the long-term viability prospect of the remaining on-site wetlands as well as provide increased functional value and wading bird foraging values to the local watershed while meeting the County's native vegetation retention requirements. The preserved wetlands meet the County hierarchy with respect to native vegetation preservation requirements for the project, though they are not interconnected with each other or to off-site preserve lands. This document provides information concerning the proposed Russell Square project site as it relates to natural resources and environmental issues. It was compiled by Tim Hall, senior ecologist and vice-president of Turrell, Hall and Associates. It is submitted to Collier County in support of a Planned Unit Development zoning request. 2 Packet Pg. 923 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement Julv 2018 2.0 WETLAND JURISDICTION AND PERMITTING HISTORY OVERVIEW There have been three residences constructed on three of the parcels making up the project site. One of these was removed in 2003 while the other two are still remaining on parcels 00407720006 and 00408120003. There are also three distinct wetland areas on the project site. One is located immediately adjacent to Santa Barbara Blvd, one is in the northeast portion of the project site and the third in in the southeast portion of the project site. The southeast wetland area is jurisdictional to the State of Florida but is not jurisdictional to the USACE due to its isolation. A jurisdictional determination was made by the USACE on January 25, 2018, verifying that parcel 00408200004 did not fall under their jurisdiction. The remaining two wetlands are jurisdictional to both the state of Florida and the USACE. Impacts proposed to the southeast wetland will require mitigation for the State. No impacts are proposed to the remaining two wetlands. 3 Packet Pg. 924 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS (PRE -DEVELOPMENT) 3.1 VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS 3.1.1 Proiect Site The existing habitat types (based on FLUCFCS codes) are shown in Table 1 below and Exhibit 2 (FLUCFCS Map). Of the total 32.89 acres contained within the combined Russell Square property boundary, approximately 82% are considered uplands (27.03 ac.) and 18% are considered wetlands (5.50 ac. of wetlands and 0.36 ac. of OSW). Several portions of the property have been infested to some degree by noxious exotic vegetation; including melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. Table 1- EXISTING HABITAT TYPES - FLUCFCS Codes & Acreages Wetland Habitat FLUCCS Code Project Acreage Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm 624 (E2) 2.44 Mixed Wetland Forest 630 (E1-2) 3.06 Total Wetland Habitat 5.50 OSW Habitat (Ponds)** 520 0.36 Total OSW Habitat 0.36 Upland Habitat Residential Low Density** 111 5.40 Unimproved Pasture** 212 16.31 Disturbed Cypress 621E4D 0.19 Pine Flatwoods 411 (E2) 4.78 Brazilian Pepper 422 0.18 Live Oak 1 427 1 0.17 Total Upland Habitat I27.03 a ** Habitats do not qualify as native habitat under Collier County guidelines as long as it can be demonstrated that they were legally cleared. There are no rare or exceptional vegetation associations present on the project lands. 0 Packet Pg. 925 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 A list of plant species observed within each habitat type is found below. C = Canopy M = Midstory G = Groundcover V = Vine E = Epiphyte * - Protected species 411 E2) — Pine Flatwoods, 4.78 acres Slash pine Pinus elliottii Slash pine Pinus elliottii C & M Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M & G Dominant Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M & G Common Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquinervia C, M & G Common Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C Occasional Earleaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis C Occasional Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Common Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Occasional Caesar weed Urena lobate G Occasional Wire grass Aristida stricta G Common Broom grass Andropogon virginicus G Common Saw palmetto Serenoa repens G Occasional Greenbriar Smilax spp. V Occasional Grapevine Vitis rotundifolia V Occasional 422(E2) — Brazilian Pepper, 0.18 acres Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M & G Dominant 427 — Live Oak. 0.17 acres Live Oak Quercus virginiana C, M & G Dominant Slash pine Pinus elliottii C & M Occasional Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M & G Occasional Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M & G Common Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C Occasional 621(E4)(D) — Cypress, disturbed, 0.19 acres G Occasional Cypress Taxodium distichum C & M Common Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M & G Dominant 624 — Cvnress-Pine-CabbaLye Palm — 2.44 acres Cypress Taxodium distichum C, M, & G Dominant Slash Pine Pinus elliottii C & M Occasional Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C, M & G Common Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C & M Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Dominant Sawgrass Cladium jamaicense G Occasional 5 Packet Pg. 926 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M & G Common Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Common Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Occasional Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C Occasional Coco plum Chrysobalanus icaco M Rare 630 — Mixed Wetland Forest — 3.06 acres Cypress Taxodium distichum Melaleuca Melaleuca auiauinervia Carolina Willow Pond apple Brazilian Pepper Swamp fern Alligator flag Salix caroliniana Annonna glabra Schinus terebinthifolia Blechnum serrulatum Thalia geniculata 3.2 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS C&M C,M&G M&G M&G M G G Common Common Common Occasional Common Common Occasional According to the SFWMD, the project lands as well as surrounding off-site lands are located within the West Collier drainage basin. The basin boundary (divide) to the north generally follows Immokalee Road (SR 846) east and west. The basin divide to the south generally follows the tidal boundary with Rookery Bay. Historically, prior to extensive human development of the area, water generally flowed from northeast to southwest driven by the land elevations dropping toward the Gulf of Mexico. Water generally flows in this same direction but largely via the existing stormwater swales and ponds associated with the Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Plan (LASIP). Surface water within the project boundary is not tidally connected and will move towards the Gulf slowly via the overland flow through the stormwater management lakes, pipes, and swales south and west of the project site. 3.3 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS Qualified Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) environmental staff inspected the project site for the purpose of delineating wetlands and other surface waters. The wetland delineation methodologies and criteria set forth by the state (in Chapter 62-340, FAC, Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters) and the Corps (in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual) were followed in determining whether an area was considered as a wetland or other surface water and in delineating the limits (boundaries) of potential jurisdictional wetlands and other surface waters. THA biologists flagged the boundaries of those areas which are considered wetlands according to the state and federal guidelines. There were very few cases where it appeared wetland lines established based on the state methodology would differ from those established based on the 31 Packet Pg. 927 Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 federal (Corps) methodology. Where this did occur, the feature boundary was flagged based on the landward -most extent of the two methods — in other words, the methodology that produced the greatest extent of wetlands was used to flag the wetland line. Sheet 02 of the enclosed exhibits depicts wetlands present on the project lands. Within the Russell Square property there are 3 distinct wetland areas that are not connected to each other either through drainage swales or via off-site wetlands. These "on-site" wetlands are individually identified and are treated as separate wetland systems. Additionally, there is a small remnant cypress area that no longer exhibits wetland characteristics and has been taken over by Brazilian pepper so was not included as a wetland area. All of the on-site wetlands are SFWMD jurisdictional while only two of them are jurisdictional to the USACE. 3.3.1 Wetland Seasonal High Water Table & Hydroperiod The hydrologic regime on this property is extremely altered from historical levels and patterns by surrounding development and the LASIP stormwater system that has been put in place in the region. Seasonal high-water elevations were determined using water lines, lichen lines, adventitious rooting, and other hydrologic indicators. Nails were placed in several trees at the seasonal high-water level indicators and will be later surveyed to determine elevations and help establish final control elevations for the development. Water from adjacent properties is now mostly cut off as a result of construction (residences and roads) around the site. There is standing water in the ponds year-round, however the remainder of the site dries out seasonally before being inundated again during rainy season. 3.3.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands All of the on-site wetlands are SFWMD jurisdictional while only two of them are jurisdictional to the USACE. 3.3.3 Jurisdictional Status of Other Surface Waters The other surface waters present on the property are man-made fill pit ponds excavated in the late -1980's and early 1990's for fill that was used on the residential construction. Due to the lack of connectivity with the wetlands and no surficial hydrologic connections to downstream navigable waters of the U.S. (tidal waters), these OSWs were assumed to not be jurisdictional with either the SFWMD or the Corps. 3.4 NATIVE HABITAT Collier County Land Development Code regulations require that project preserve a portion of their on-site native habitat as part of their development proposal. Calculations are based on a percentage of the acreage of native habitat existing on the site. Lands within the County ROW are not included in this calculation. Since the Russell Square property is greater than 20 acres in size, it will be required to preserve 25% of the native vegetation on the site. The property is 7 I 9.B.e I CL M m r c d E M a Packet Pg. 928 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 32.89 acres in size and based on the FLUCFCS mapping pasture, residences, and other legally cleared lands do not count towards native vegetation totals. The sections below break out the overall property into the individual components to try and better explain the native vegetation calculations. 3.4.1 Pasture Parcel Clearing of approximately 3/4 of this parcel occurred in the early 1970's. The 1973 aerial shows the clearing for pasture use as well as a residence and a couple of small ponds. The wetland area along the west side of the property was not cleared and was contiguous with a larger wetland system to the west. Since the clearing was for pasture use and was done before the County Ordinance 76-42 it is exempt from the need for an ag clearing permit (LDC 10.02.06.C.1.d). By 2003 exotic vegetation had taken over large portions of the site and the grazing value of the site was much reduced. Extensive exotic removal was undertaken in 2004 and 2005. A bark beetle infestation also hit the property in 2005 which killed a good number of the pines which had been left as shade for the livestock. In 2009 and 2010, Santa Barbara Blvd was extended down past this property and the northern portion of the site was used as a storage and staging area for the road construction. Additional clearing on the site was done as part of that construction. The portions of the site cleared for this staging are also exempt from the native vegetation calculations per LDC 3.05.07.B.2. This information was provided to the County in 2014 as part of a due diligence investigation to build a small farm stand operation on this site. This 2014 coordination determined that all the pasture area except for 1.79 acres had been cleared legally. The 1.79 acres would need to be included in any native vegetation retention requirements for future development or agricultural use. An after the fact agricultural clearing permit (ACP-PL20140000566) was obtained to account for the clearing that had occurred within 0.56 acres in the extreme north east corner of the property. Further coordination with County staff as a result of the current zoning submittal resulted in staff looking at the site differently than in 2014. The current review determined that in areas of the previously cleared pasture where the pines and palms had been allowed to grow to 8 inches dbh or greater and were present at densities greater than 8 trees per acre, then those trees would need to be included in the native vegetation calculations. A tree count conducted in those areas determined that there were 72 slash pine trees and 7 sabal palm trees which would meet the criteria specified. 25% of these will need to be retained or replaced. Development of the site will include fill and earthwork which will make it unlikely to be able to save any of the trees in place, so they will be replaced with minimum 10 foot tall trees. The 20 trees (79 * 0.25) will need to be located within an area at least 0.52 acre in size {[(18 trees * 20'radius2 * 0/43560] + [(2 trees * 5'radius2 * 0/43560]} (LDC3.05.07.A.2). The proposed preserve area is greater than required so these trees will be located within the buffer area of the preserve which is in excess of the required acreage. 3.4.2 North Single -Family Parcel It could not be determined definitively that all of the clearing associated with the northernmost single-family parcel was actually permitted. It is obvious from aerial Packet Pg. 929 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 photograph investigations that the clearing and construction was all done at the same time in 1993 and 1995. A residence, barn, pond, and riding ring were all part of the original construction. The plans and drawings associated with the construction permits issued only show the house footprint though, not the entire property or accessory components (riding ring and pond) so it could not be determined if clearing done for those accessory uses was permitted. Both permits issued for this property in 1993 and 1995 were COW and no violation noted. An additional structure was built in 2012 that encompassed 0.25 acre of the already previously cleared area. Collier Code (3.05.02.F.1) allows for up to 1 acre of clearing associated with single family residences without additional clearing authorizations needed. The County Code has an exemption from this provision for properties that were cleared prior to January 1989 but that didn't apply to this property since the permits were issued in 1993 and 1995. Since no additional authorizations were found, the clearing of the property over the 1.25 acres permitted was counted as native habitat for the preserve requirement calculations. 3.4.3 Central Single -Family Parcel The center single family parcel was permitted and cleared in 1983 so is prior to the January 1989 exception date in the County LDC (3.05.07.B.2.a) and therefore not subject to the native vegetation calculations. More of the site was originally cleared than is depicted on the exhibits due to the regeneration of some trees that have been left to grow. Mowing of the understory is still done regularly. The majority of the trees on this single family parcel also fall below the 8" dbh requirement to be counted as native on maintained properties (LDC 3.05.07.A.2). There are 6 trees over 8" dbh which is less than the 8 trees/acre standard to meet the native vegetation requirement so none of this area was included in the native vegetation or native tree preservation calculations. 3.4.4 South Undeveloped Parcel a This parcel contains a mix of upland and isolated wetland communities almost all of which qualify at native habitat. A small area of Brazilian pepper has no canopy overstory and m therefore does not qualify as native habitat per the County Code. All of the rest of this parcel was included in the native preservation calculations. z Taking all of the above into account, the native preservation calculation is based on the a remaining acreage of 13.88 acres (see Native Vegetation Table Below). The project will be required to preserve 25% of this acreage or a minimum of 3.47 acres. The project will also be required to preserve 25% of the existing trees that are greater than 8 inches dbh and in densities greater than 8 trees per acre. The native tree preservation calculation is based on 72 slash pine trees and 7 palms which meet the preservation requirements. It will be impossible to retain these trees within the site plan, so replacements will be planted in additional lands that are added to buffer the required preserve acreage. A minimum of 0.52 additional acres (over and above the native preserve requirement) will be identified for planting of the native trees required. 9 Packet Pg. 930 Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 The project is currently proposing to preserve 3.47 acres of native habitat onsite as well as an additional 0.54 acres for a total preserve area of 4.01 acres; therefore it is compliant with the County LDC preservation requirements of section 3.05.07. The proposed preserve lands will be in two different locations in order to preserve the higher quality wetland areas and so will need a deviation from LDC 3.05.07.A.5 to account for all of the preserve lands not being interconnected or contiguous. Table 2- NATIVE VEGETATION ACREAGES Habitat FLUCCS Code Total Acreage Native Vegetation Acreage Residential 111 5.40 1.10 Pasture 212 16.31 1.85 Pine Flatwoods 411 4.78 4.78 Brazilian Pepper 422 0.18 0.00 Oak 427 0.17 0.17 Disturbed Cypress 621 0.19 0.19 Cypress -Pine -Cabbage Palm 624 2.44 2.44 Mixed Wetland Forest 630 3.06 3.06 Ponds (OSW) 520 0.36 0.29 32.89 13.88 25% Native Vegetation Retention 3.47 Native Tree Calculations Species # present Required Preserve Acreage Equivalent Slash Pine (>8" dbh + > 8 trees/acre) 72 18 0.519 Cabbage Palm (>8' trunk + > 8 trees/acre 7 2 0.004 20 0.52 Proposed Onsite Preservation 4.01 3.5 LISTED PLANT & ANIMAL SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species has been conducted within the project area by THA biologists. This threatened and endangered species survey and its results are discussed in the attached Appendix B. The Threatened & Endangered Species report describes the approximate locations where listed animal species were observed on and near the project area during the course of the referenced survey. During the survey events white ibis (Eudocimus albus), snowy egret (Egretta thula), and little blue heron (Egretta caerulea) were observed. No other listed species were observed within the project area. A few listed animal species in addition to those documented on the project lands by THA have some potential for occurring in certain habitats present on project lands. These species are 10 I 9.B.e I CL M m r c d E z a Packet Pg. 931 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 discussed in Appendix B and include; indigo snake, roseate spoonbill, limpkin, southeastern American kestrel, Big Cypress fox squirrel, Florida bonneted bat, and Florida black bear. The probability of these animals utilizing suitable habitats in project lands ranges from very low to moderate depending upon the particular species (see discussion in Appendix B). It is improbable that any of these species currently reside or nest on the project lands. These listed species records and the source of these records are also discussed in Appendix B. It is highly unlikely that any federally listed plant species could be present on the project lands. Several butterfly orchids (Encyclia tampensis) were observed growing on cypress trees on the project site. These orchids are listed as "less rare" in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The orchids were located within areas proposed to be preserves so no relocation will be required. Due to isolation, exotic species encroachment, proximity to major roadways, and degradation of foraging habitat, it is apparent that this site offers only minimal value to local wildlife. The surrounding developments, and roads have partially isolated this property and made travel to it by larger terrestrial wildlife difficult. 3.6 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted and the response back indicated that there were no recorded archaeological sites in close proximity to the subject property. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. a 3.7 SOILS ' M m Based on the National Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) "Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida" (MRCS, 1998) there are two (2) different soil types (soil map units) present on the project lands. Exhibit 05 provides a soils map for the project area as derived from the NRCS mapping. The following sub -sections provide a brief description of each soil map unit identified on the project lands. Information is provided about the soil's landscape position (i.e. it's typical a location in the landscape on a county -wide basis), the soil's profile (i.e. textural composition and thickness or depth range of the layers or horizons commonly present in the soil), and the soil's drainage and hydrologic characteristics. The soils occurring on project lands are as follows: (14) Pineda Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum This nearly level poorly drained soil is in sloughs and poorly defined drainageways. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 20 to 300 acres. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. 11 Packet Pg. 932 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown fine sand about 4 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light brownish gray fine sand to a depth of about 12 inches. The subsoil is to a depth of about 55 inches; the upper part is brownish yellow and very pale brown fine sand, the middle part is grayish brown sandy clay loam, and the lower part is light brownish gray and dark grayish brown fine sandy loam. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 55 inches. In 95 percent of areas mapped as this soil, Pineda and similar soil make up 79 to 100 percent of the map unit. The characteristics of Holopaw and Riviera, limestone substratum soils are similar. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in this unit are small areas of Boca, Hallandale and Malabar soils on similar landscape positions. These soils make up about 11 percent or less of the unit. The permeability of this soil is slow. The available water capacity is low. In most years, under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is within 12 inches of the surface for 3 to 6 months. In other months, the water table is below 12 inches and recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. During periods of high rainfall, the soil is covered by shallow slowly moving water for periods of about 7 to 30 days. Natural vegetation consists of South Florida slash pine, wax myrtle, chalky bluestem, blue maidencane and gulf muhly. This soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops because of wetness and droughtiness. With good water -control measures and soil -improving measures, the soil can be made suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water control system is needed to remove excess water in wet seasons and provide water through subsurface irrigation in dry season. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparations should include bedding of the rows. Fertilizer and lime should be added according to the need of the crops. With proper water control, the soil is moderately suited to citrus. Water control systems that maintain good drainage to an effective depth are needed. Bedding the soil prior to planting provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high water table. A good grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are younger. With good water control management, this soil is well suited to pasture. A water control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. It is well suited to pangolagrass, bahiagrass and clover. Excellent pastures of grass or grass -clover mixtures can be grown with good management. Regular applications of fertilizers and controlled grazing are needed for highest yields. This soil is well suited for desirable range plant production. The dominant forage consists of blue maidencane, chalky bluestem and bluejoint panicum. Management practices should include deferred grazing. This Pineda soil is in the slough range site. 12 Packet Pg. 933 Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses because of the high water table. To overcome this limitation, building sites and septic tank absorption fields should be mounded. This soil also has severe limitations for recreational development because of wetness and sandy textures. Problems associated with wetness can be corrected by providing adequate drainage and drainage outlets to control the high water table. The sandy texture limitation can be overcome by adding suitable topsoil or by resurfacing the area. This Pineda soil is in capability subclass IIIw. (21) Boca Fine Sand This nearly level, poorly drained soil is on the flatwoods. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 20 to 350 acres. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer is very dark gray fine sand about 4 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 26 inches; the upper part is light gray and the lower part is brown. The subsoil is dark grayish brown fine sandy loam to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. In 95 percent of areas mapped as this soil, Boca and similar soils make up 79 to 93 percent of the map unit. The characteristics of Hallandale soils are similar. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in this map unit are small areas of Pineda and Riviera, limestone substratum soils in slough landscape positions. These soils make up about 7 to 21 percent of the unit. The permeability of this soil is moderate. The available water capacity is very low. In most years, under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is between 6 to 18 inches of the surface of 1 to 6 months. In other months, the water table is below 18 inches and recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Rarely is it above the surface. Natural vegetation consists mostly of South Florida slash pine, cabbage palm, sawpalmetto, wax myrtle, chalky bluestem and pineland threeawn. This soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops because of wetness and droughtiness. The number of adapted crops is limited unless very intensive management practices are followed. With good water control and soil improving measures, the soil can be made suitable form many fruit and vegetable crops. A water control system is needed to remove excess water in wet season and provide water through subsurface irrigation in dry seasons. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Fertilizer and lime should be added according to the need of the crops. With proper water control, the soil is well suited to citrus. Water control systems that maintain good drainage to an effective depth are needed. Bedding the soil prior to planting provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high water table. A good 13 I 9.B.e I a Packet Pg. 934 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are young. With good water control management, this soil is well suited to pasture. A water control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. It is well suited to pangolagrass, bahiagrass and clover. Excellent pastures of grass or grass -clover mixtures can be grown with good management. Regular applications of fertilizers and controlled grazing are needed for highest yields. This soil is moderately suited for desirable range plant production. The dominant forage is creeping bluestem, lopsided indiangrass, pineland threeawn and chalky bluestem. Management practices should include deferred grazing and brush control. This Boca soil is in the South Florida Flatwood range site. This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses because of wetness. If this soil is used as septic tank absorption fields, it should be mounded to maintain the system well above the seasonal high water table. For recreational uses, this soil also has severe limitations because of wetness, but with proper drainage to remove excess surface water during wet periods, many of these limitations can be overcome. This Boca soil is in capability subclass IIIw. CL M m r c d E a 14 Packet Pg. 935 Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement Julv 2018 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS (POST -DEVELOPMENT) 4.1 PROPOSED PROJECT The purpose of the proposed Russell Square project is to develop a new residential community within the eastern Collier County area. The location of the project is in a region where there is currently a demand for home sites with access to community amenities such are found in the Collier County area (access to beaches, golf courses, shopping, etc.). Various acreage estimates for the proposed project are provided in Table 3 below. TABLE 4. RUSSELL SQUARE PROJECT CUMULATIVE ACREAGE SUMMARY LAND TYPES TOTAL PROPERTY ACREAGE EXISTING CONDITIONS Total Area 1 1 32.89 Acres Existing Wetlands & Waters Wetlands 5.50 Acres OSW 0.36 Acres TOTAL Wetlands & Waters 5.86 Acres Uplands 27.03 Acres PROPOSED PROJECT ACREAGE Wetlands & Waters to be Impacted Wetland Impacts Direct 2.44 Acres Wetland Impacts Secondary 0.00 Acres TOTAL Wetlands & Waters to be Impacted 2.44 Acres Wetlands & Waters to be Enhanced and Preserved Wetlands 3.06 Acres Uplands to be Enhanced and Preserved Uplands 0.95 Acres TOTAL Lands Preserved 4.01 Acres 15 I 9.B.e I a Packet Pg. 936 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement Julv 2018 4.2 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS 4.2.1 Direct, Permanent Impacts Development of the proposed project will impact some wetlands though the wetlands to be impacted are isolated and are not jurisdictional to the USACE. The proposed development will result in direct, permanent impacts on the project site to a total of 2.44 acres of State jurisdictional wetlands. Please see attached Exhibit (Sheet 04) for more detail. As used herein, the term "direct impacts" refers to actions that will result in the complete elimination of jurisdictional areas (i.e. dredging and filling). The remainder of the existing wetlands on-site will be preserved (3.06 acres). The wetlands proposed to be impacted are relatively low functioning wetlands due to past impacts and exotic vegetation infestation. UMAM score for the existing functional values of the wetland to be impacted is 0.43. The wetlands to be preserved on the northern side of the property are contiguous to off-site systems and are the least likely to be cut off by future surrounding development and development proposed on-site. The wetland to be preserved on the west side of the development is adjacent to the existing man-made swale along Santa Barbara Blvd. Transient use of these wetlands by wading birds will continue to be available within the preserves proposed. 4.2.2 Temporary Impacts Minimal temporary impacts are expected with this development. Prior to construction commencement all preserved areas will be enclosed with siltation -prevention devices, which will remain in place until the adjacent construction is completed. 4.2.3 Secondary Impacts to Wetlands & Water Resources The proposed layout of the project's development features will result in minor secondary impacts to the adjacent wetlands south of the project site. Secondary impacts are assessed when an average 25 foot and minimum 15 foot naturally vegetated upland buffer between the development and the wetland is not established. This is consistent with the State's Environmental Resource Permitting guidelines. The proposed wetland and upland preserves will prevent most secondary impacts to the off-site wetland areas but the one area the will be secondarily impacted will be mitigated through the purchase of off-site mitigation credits from an approved mitigation bank. 4.2.4 Cumulative Impacts to Wetlands No cumulative impacts are expected as a result of this project. The development of this property will not increase the development likelihood of adjacent parcels and any wetland impacts associated with those parcels will have to be mitigated through the proper permitting channels. 16 Packet Pg. 937 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 4.3 PRESERVATION OF WETLANDS, OTHER SURFACE WATERS, AND UPLANDS Development of the proposed Russell Square project will impact 2.44 acres of the State of Florida Jurisdictional wetlands. The proposed project will impact predominately disturbed, exotic infested habitat areas on the property. Higher quality native wetland areas will be preserved. All of the preserved areas will be enhanced through the removal of exotic vegetation and improvements to hydrology. The proposed Russell Square project will include 2 preserve areas within the project boundaries which will contain preserved and enhanced wetlands and uplands. The attached Exhibits (Sheet 05) illustrate the location of the proposed conservation areas. The preserve wetlands will maintain the hydrological connectivity that currently exists. No project stormwater will be routed through these wetlands. All of the preserved areas will be placed under appropriate conservation easements as required, which will protect the future integrity of the wetland and upland habitats contained in these areas. Appropriate access easements will also be provided to insure future maintenance of the preserve areas can be undertaken. All Preserve areas will be delineated and marked with appropriate signage identifying the preserve boundary and restrictions associated with the preserve. Signage will be place at least 150 feet apart and no more than 300 feet apart along all interfaces with the development. Signage will not be placed along the shared borders with existing Conservation lands. 4.4 PROJECT IMPACTS TO LISTED SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species was conducted on the project site by THA biologists in 2014 and updated in late 2017. The listed animals associated with this project site as observed directly or indirectly by THA included the white ibis, snowy egret, and little blue heron. A few listed animal species, in addition to those documented, have the potential to occur in certain habitats present on-site. These species include but are not limited to the indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi), tricolor heron (Egretta tricolor), roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger), and Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus). The probability of these animals utilizing suitable on-site habitats ranges from high to low depending on the particular species. None of these species currently reside or nest on-site. The following subsections provide an assessment of the proposed project's potential impacts to various listed animal species. The species addressed include those observed on or in close proximity to the subject property as well as certain species that could potentially occur on the Russell Square site or on nearby off-site parcels. 17 Packet Pg. 938 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 Wood Storks (Mycteria americana) No wood stork nests, rookeries, or roosting sites have been found on the subject property though foraging in the freshwater marsh area along Santa Barbara Blvd is possible. The closest documented wood stork colony is located approximately 18 miles to the northeast at Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary. The site is appropriate for foraging within the existing man-made fill pit ponds, and open wetland forest habitats. The open forest habitat adjacent to Santa Barbara Blvd will be preserved under the current project proposal. The proposed project will impact 2.44 acres of wetlands on-site, however these areas are of lower value foraging habitat for the wood stork. The foraging opportunities provided can vary significantly during a given year due to a wide array of factors that include, but are not limited to: water levels present; variable abundance of prey species; and available access of prey species to wetland areas. The proposed wetland preserve area will result in the preservation and enhancement of suitable wood stork foraging habitats. Proposed Determination of Effect: Given these considerations, use of the USFWS Wood Stork Key, outlined in the USFWS South Florida Programmatic Concurrence Letter dated January 25, 2010 and the May 18, 2010 addendum, to conduct a sequential effect determination for the species resulted in the following key sequential determination: A-B-C-E-NLAA and it is concluded that the proposed project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" wood storks (MANLAA). Various Listed Wading Birds Snowy egrets (Egretta thula), little blue herons (Egretta caerulea), and white ibis (Eudocimus alba) have been documented in the wetlands on-site and within the vicinity of the site. No nests of these species have been observed within the project area. In addition to the observed species, other listed wading birds that could frequent appropriate habitats within the project area include roseate spoonbills (Platalea ajaja), tricolor herons (Egretta tricolor), and limpkins (Aramus guarauna). Development of the project area will result in the loss of 2.44 acres of on-site wetlands that could be utilized by the wading birds mentioned, though it is important to note that this wetland is infested by exotic vegetation and does not have a sufficient hydrologic regime to provide high quality foraging opportunities. The on-site preserve will enhance and protect 3.06 acres of appropriate on-site habitats that could be utilized by foraging wading birds in addition to adding lake shoreline where foraging activities can be observed. Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais counerb No indigo snakes have been observed on-site, however the majority of the project area could provide some habitat for indigo snakes. Considering their elusive nature, their large home range, and the wide array of habitats they may utilize, there is potential that indigo snakes could occasionally frequent portions of the project area. M Packet Pg. 939 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 Proposed Determination of Effect: In consideration of these points and given the potential probability of any indigo snakes occurring on the project lands, use of the USFWS Eastern Indigo Snake Key outlined in the USFWS' North and South Florida Programmatic Concurrence Letter, dated January 25, 2010 and the August 13, 2013 Addendum, to conduct a sequential effect determination for the species resulted in the following key sequential determination: A-B- C-D-E-NLAA and results in a "May affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination for this species. Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumons floridanus) The Florida bonneted bat (FBB) utilizes habitats such as hardwoods and pinelands for foraging. The project area does contain some pine flatwoods and cypress -pine -palm habitats suitable for Florida bonneted bat foraging though it is important to note that much of this habitat is densely forested which would preclude bat flight through the forested areas. Much of this habitat will be impacted with the development of the proposed project, however, following the enhancement activities, the entire preserve area will consist of open forested habitat suitable for Florida bonneted bat foraging. The project site is located within the FBB consultation area but is not located within any of the Focal Areas that have been designated by FWS. Surveys of the site have been conducted to search for potential roosts. Cavity trees observed were peeped to determine if any roosting was present. To date no evidence of any bat presence on the site has been observed. Proposed Determination of Effect: Based on our analysis of the existing conditions of the site, the proposed, enhanced, open forested preserve areas, and the lack of any documented FBB presence, our proposed determination is that the proposed project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" MANLAA the FBB. a Big CyUress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus hiker) M m The Big Cypress Fox Squirrel has not been observed on-site however they have been known to utilize habitats such as cypress, cypress -pine -cabbage palm, and pine flatwoods that do exist on the project site. Much of the habitat has been infested with exotic vegetation which limits fox squirrel use and foraging. The proposed project would result in impacts to 2.44 acres of cypress - pine -cabbage palm, and 2.54 acres of pine flatwoods. Fox squirrels have been shown in many a locations to prefer suburban habitats including golf courses and low-density residential areas. The preserve habitats will be enhanced for fox squirrel utilization through the elimination of exotic vegetation and the opening up of the site through said removal. However, the isolation of the site amidst other development and roadways makes the use of the site by fox squirrels unlikely. Little affect to the Big Cypress fox squirrel is expected. 19 Packet Pg. 940 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement Julv 2018 4.5 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted and the response back indicated that there were no recorded sites in close proximity to the proposed project. Should any archaeological evidence be discovered during construction, the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. CL M m r c d E z a 20 Packet Pg. 941 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 5.0 AVOIDANCE & MINIMIZATION OF WETLAND IMPACTS Alternative Site Plans The applicant has made all appropriate and practicable steps to minimize impacts to existing jurisdictional wetlands. The final site plan as presented in this document shows that all of the higher quality natural wetlands within the project boundary have been avoided. The wetland preserves will be avoided and remain connected to off-site flows as exists in the current conditions. The preservation of upland and wetland areas along the northeast boundary will provide a buffer between the development and the off-site adjacent wetlands to the north and east. Avoidance During Construction During construction, appropriate best management practices will be employed to help protect water quality and avoid the discharge of sediments and/or turbid water from the project site into both the on-site and off-site wetlands. The specific erosion/sediment/turbidity control methods and devices used will conform to applicable standards and criteria set forth in the "FDER Florida Development Manual," Sections 6-301 through 6-500 (FDER. 1988. "The Florida Development Manual: A Guide to Sound Land and Water Management," Chapter 6: "Storm Water and Erosion Control Best Management Practices for Developing Areas; Guidelines for Using Erosion and Sediment Control Practices," ES BMP 1.01-1.67. FDER, Tallahassee, FL.). These methods will also conform to applicable standards and guidelines set forth in the "Florida Stormwater, Erosion, and Sedimentation Control Inspector's Manual" (FDEP, 2002). The boundaries of all the wetland areas adjacent to the construction activities will be delineated with silt fencing in order to clearly identify the wetland areas and to protect them from inadvertent impacts or encroachment by the machinery during project construction. Preserve Management Plan The Russell Square project has proposed to establish on-site preserve areas to minimize wetland impacts associated with the residential development. The project will also undertake enhancement activities within the preserve areas which will improve the functional value of the wetlands and insure that no long term impacts will occur as a result of the propose development activities. A Management Plan for the short and long-term enhancement and maintenance activities will be created and submitted for review at the time of site development plan approval. 21 Packet Pg. 942 Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 6.0 PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH CCME The following Section outlines how the project is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Each of the 13 Goals of the CCME is listed along with how that Goal is applicable to the proposed project. For those Goals that are not applicable, no further description is included. GOAL 1: TO PLAN FOR THE PROTECTION, CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT AND APPROPRIATE USE OF THE COUNTY'S NATURAL RESOURCES. This Goal is more applicable to the County process in general than to any single project. The project has used data available from the County resources to plan the project and protect species, habitats, and resources to the greatest extent practicable. GOAL 2: TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S SURFACE AND ESTUARINE WATER RESOURCES. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District as part of the ERP process. The project will also be reviewed by County reviewers during the PUD and SDP applications. Surface water management, water quality concerns, and outfall quantities and locations will all undergo review and will be consistent with any regional or local Watershed Management Plans. The Project stormwater will meet all applicable State and Local water quality criteria. GOAL 3: TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S GROUND WATER RESOURCES TO ENSURE THE HIGHEST WATER QUALITY PRACTICAL. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District as part of the ERP process. Groundwater extractions for the purposes of irrigation may be permitted upon SFWMD review. Any irrigation use will be monitored to insure that adverse impacts to groundwater resources are not adversely impacted. GOAL 4: TO CONSERVE, PROTECT AND APPROPRIATELY MANAGE THE COUNTY'S FRESH WATER RESOURCES. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District as part of the ERP process. Groundwater extractions for the purposes of irrigation may be permitted upon SFWMD review. If applicable and available, the Project will utilize treated effluent (re -use) water for irrigation. GOAL 5: TO PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE THE COUNTY'S MINERAL AND SOIL RESOURCES. No mineral extraction is contemplated on the Project property. The Project will utilize appropriate BMPs to protect soils on the project site from erosion or disturbance during construction activities. Silt fencing, protective barriers, berms, and swales could all be used during construction activities on the site. 22 I 9.B.e I a Packet Pg. 943 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 GOAL 6: TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. The Project as proposed is consistent with Goal 6 and its objectives specifically; Objective 6.1 — The Project will preserve a minimum of 25% of the existing native habitat on the project site. The property contains 12.49 acres of native vegetation and cannot account for an additional 1.39 acres of historic clearing that has been done. The project is therefore required to preserve a minimum of 3.47 acres. The project is also required to preserve 20 additional trees due to larger trees that were allowed to grow up in the pasture area. The preservation of these additional trees will require 0.52 acres of open space. While the code does not require that the lands used for native tree preservation be under conservation easement, these trees will be placed within CE area that is more than the required acreage to meet the native preservation requirement. As proposed, the project will preserve 4.01 acres of native habitats, which is more than required. In addition, the areas proposed for preservation meet the hierarchy standards of this Objective in that the areas are utilized by listed species and do include the higher functional wetlands. Because of the separation of the high quality areas by a roadway and pasture lands the preserves are not interconnected within the site. One of the preserve areas is contiguous with offsite lands to the north and east while the remaining preserve area is sandwiched between the development area and Santa Barbara Blvd. Objective 6.2 — The Project will preserve higher quality functional wetlands within the project boundary and will appropriately mitigate for lost functions through purchase of mitigation credits from an approved wetland mitigation bank. Valuation of the functionality of the wetlands to be impacted and the mitigation requirements will be reviewed by both the SFWMD and the USACE as part of the ERP review process. Preservation of the higher quality wetland habitats will be a priority for the state and federal permitting agencies. Both proposed wetland areas are also located within Special Treatment overlays which the County had used to identify higher quality wetland areas. Objective 6.5 — Appropriate buffers and setbacks from construction activities on the project site will be maintained from the existing adjacent wetlands to the north and east. GOAL 7: TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE THE COUNTY'S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. The Project as proposed is consistent with Goal 7 and its objectives specifically; Objective 7.1 — The Project has conducted a Protected Species Survey over the Project lands. This survey will be updated periodically during the permitting process to insure that new species do not take up residence on the Project lands without knowledge. Lands known to be utilized by listed species, such as the wetland along Santa Barbara Blvd. have been proposed for preservation. Species Management Plans will be completed for the Project which will outline how the proposed project can move forward while minimizing the risk of adversely impacting any protected species. Coordination and review with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) will be undertaken to insure that potential impacts to state and federally protected species are minimized. GOAL 8: TO MAINTAIN COLLIER COUNTY'S EXISTING AIR QUALITY. The Project will comply with all applicable State and Federal air quality standards. All site construction equipment will be maintained appropriately in terms of emissions standards and potential air pollution. 23 Packet Pg. 944 I 9.B.e I Russell Square Collier County Environmental Supplement July 2018 GOAL 9: TO APPROPRIATELY MANAGE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S POPULOUS AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND TO ENSURE THE HIGHEST ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. This Goal is more applicable to County efforts than to individual projects. Consistent with Objective 9.3, the project will encourage resident participation in hazardous waste collection days to try and help insure that household hazardous wastes are disposed of properly in coordination with the County's efforts. GOAL 10: TO PROTECT, CONSERVE, MANAGE, AND APPROPRIATELY USE THE COUNTY'S COASTAL BARRIERS INCLUDING SHORELINES, BEACHES AND DUNES AND PLAN FOR, AND WHERE APPROPRIATE, RESTRICT ACTIVITIES WHERE SUCH ACTIVITIES WILL DAMAGE OR DESTROY COASTAL RESOURCES. This Project will not affect any coastal barriers, dunes, beaches, shorelines, or any other coastal resources. GOAL 11: TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROTECTION, RESERVATION, AND SENSITIVE RE -USE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES. This Project will not affect any historical or archaeological properties or resources. GOAL 12: TO MAKE EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT TO ENSURE THE PUBLIC SAFETY, HEALTH AND WELFARE OF PEOPLE AND PROPERTY FROM THE EFFECTS OF HURRICANE STORM DAMAGE. The Project is not located within the County's Coastal High Hazard Area. All building construction on the Project will be subject to building code regulation and will adhere to construction standards with respect to wind loadings and hurricane protection. On-site construction will have a hurricane preparedness plan outlining steps to follow should a hurricane approach while site construction is under way. GOAL 13: TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DUPLICATION OF EXISTING REGULATORY PROGRAMS. The Project will undergo review by the SFWMD, and FWC. Review by USACE and FWS is not expected due to the fact that no federal jurisdictional areas will be impacted by the development. All correspondence and permitting undertaken with these agencies will be provided to the County upon request to assist with County review and minimize duplication of permitting efforts. 24 Packet Pg. 945 I 9.B.e I STATE OF FLORIDA RGLADES CITY COLLIER COUNTY VICINITY MAP Turrell & Associates, Inc. Marine & Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 KEY WEST dQ .•o SITE ADDRESS: EP> NAPLES 2505 SUNSET BLVDEFL 34112 NOTES: D> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. E> LATITUDE: N 26.131031 E> LONGITUDE: W -81.716983 COUNTY AERIAL DESIGNED: I TH I REVISION: TAB NAME: LOCATIOI RUSSELL SQUARE DRAWN BY: RMJ N/A SHEET: 01 CREATED: 03-05-18 N/A I SCALE: 1ASSHOW LOCATION MAP JOB NO.: 1354 1 N/A SECTION -9 TOWNSHIP -50S RANGE -26 E L 3 r O O 0 ti T 0 N J a N O a 0 co Iq co rL 7 Y V m m r C d E m V to a Packet Pg. 946 P:\1354-sunset Jvd property\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-COUNTY\1354-CROSS-CNTY.dwg 9.B.e N 4 t n +00 200 400 0. scatcE9N, e • ..n. erx .n/►i EET AML Y ' Q19lT' _ fk I w+r t i cLC CO CD r_ Q 'F - d �r�4t1 N :W •� r C,�• ..ri 1 2 I r: t O Iq rL • * r £ f Y • 14= V % ff OA. _ • ID FLUCCS DESCRIPTION ACRES � FIXED SINGLE FAMILY UNITS <LESS THAN TWO Q 1 111 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE> 3.04 D UPLAND (ACRES): 27.03 2 212 UNIMPROVED PASTURES 16.31 3 BORROW AREA 0.07 Ell k SFWMD ONLY WETLANDS (ACRES): 2.44 4 BORROW AREA 0.29 i 5 630 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED 2.05 SFWMD ❑USAGE WETLANDS (ACRES): 3.06 �Pr 6 630 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED 1.01 s 7 624 CYPRESS-PINE-CABBAGE PALM 2.44 BORROW (ACRES): 0.36 8 411E2 PINE FLATWOODS-EXOTICS 25%-50% 4.78 PROJECT (ACRES): 32.89 ` J 9 111 FIXED SINGLE FAMILY UNITS <LESS THAN TWO 2.36 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE> NOTES: 10 621 E4 CYPRESS-EXOTICS 750-100:1(NON HYDRIC) 0.19 THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. - 11 427 LIVE OAK 0.17 ` SURVEY COURTESY OF: "NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE" - :1 2 12 422 BRADILIAN PEPPER 0.18 1{` SURVEY DATED: MM-DD-YYYY TOTAL 32.89 DESIGNED: TH REVISION: TAB NAME: FLUCCS Turrell & Associates Inc. RUSSELL SQUARE DRAWN BY: RMJ 5118-REVISED PER CNTY RAI SHEET: 02 Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 03-0618 N/A SCALE: AS SHOWI f 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 F L U C F CS MAP JOB NO.: 1354 N/A Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION-9 TOWNSHIP- Packet Pg. 947 PA1354-Sunset Blvd Property\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-COUNTY\1354-CROSS-CNTY.dwg fji F f i ® NATIVE HABITAT (ACRES): 10.38 CLEARED AREA COUNTED AS NATIVE HABITAT (PERMITS FOR CLEARING NOT 3.50 FOUND) + + NATIVE TREE COUNT 72 PINES > 8' DBH + + + > 8 TREES PER ACRE 7 PALMS > 8' TRUNK TOTAL (ACRES): 13.88 3 V� I 9.B.e I mm , 0 +00 200 400 JCAL'E9N7=r i ®1 - AREAS IDENTIFIED AS LEGALLY 14.46 CLEARED THROUGH PRIOR COORDINATION WITH COUNTY ® 2 - LEGALLY CLEARED PRIOR TO 1989 3.12 3 - CLEARED 1993 (1 ACRE LEGALLY CLEARED AND 1.25 ADDITIONAL 0.25 AC ASSOCIATED WITH ROAD AND BUILDING IN 2012) EXOTICS 0.18 f IF R!� NOTES: NATIVE HABITAT REQUIRED: 3.47 AC. ' THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND NATIVE TREES REQUIRED: 20 TREES (0.52 AC.) ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE" ■■ SURVEY DATED: MM-DD-YYYY DESIGNED: TH REVISION: TAB NAME: NATIVE` Turrell & Associates Inc. RUSSELL SQUARE DRAWN BY: RMJ M13-REVISEDPERCNTYRAI SHEET: 03 Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 03-05-18 7118 ADDED TREE COUNT SCALE: AS SHOW. 3584ExchangeAve. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 NATIVE HABITAT JOB NO.: 1354 N/A Email:tuna@turrell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION -9 TOWNSHIP - a Packet Pg. 948 P:\1354 -sunset Jvd property\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-COUNTY\1354-CROSS-CNTY.dwg R I I IMWATER ANAGEMENT I 9.B.e I N o +o0 200 400 SCAZT 9N 77=r R '.'.'.'.'.`.`...:.�.�. ................ R R i WATER R I/ MANAGEMENT ®WETLAND IMPACT (AC.)2.44 NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE" SURVEY DATED: MM-DD-YYYY Turrell & Associates, Inc. Marine & Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 Email: tana@Wffell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 RUSSELL SQUARE IMPACTS MAP —, l WATER MANAGEME T ..,t I I� � I f" B l i PROJECT BOUNDARY DESIGNED: TH REVISION: I TAB NAME: IMPACTS DRAWN BY: RMJ 5/18 -ADDED IMPACT SHEET: 04 CREATED: 03-0618 N/A SCALE: AS SHOWI JOB NO.: 1354 N/q SECTION -9 TOWNSHIP - Packet Pg. 949 1 ID WETLAND PRESERVE ACRES 1 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED 2.05 2 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED 1.01 TOTAL 3.06 Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Marine & Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732 Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 M �% � .,may a�,.,�///,� ,,_«,, ,I 00 ��001Q0j�% �1VY��YNV►'l �:Y 11 u51 11 i NWWMNV✓Y IC�'YNa�d4� MMVVVVWWVVM I 9.B.e I N S' a +ga 3aa 6aa JCA,''E 9N =r ® UPLAND PRESERVE (ACRES): 0-95 ® WETLAND PRESERVE (ACRES): 3-06 TOTAL PRESERVE (ACRES): 4-01 NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. SURVEY COURTESY OF: "NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE" SURVEY DATED: MM-DD-YYYY DESIGNED: TH RUSSELL SQUARE °R nrFnY: RAN PRESERVE MAP SECTION -9 meaee ®eaee mma=§ mmamm mmamm 1 • I ► .1' L 0 0 O ti r O N J a N a 00 to cc a 3 U M m C E t U M Q Packet Pg. 950 1 P:\1354 -sunset Jvd property\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-COUNTY\1354-CROSS-CNTY.dwg PROJECT- BOUNDARY ROJECT- BOUNDARY Ith' 9.B.e F N J�; ► L Th h .-Ji- Y y r r' �• y yy t' •-� llq .114 !i s _ �" C ',�• O s. - N r a 00 rL M ' .. E z • # r �. v CODE DESCRIPTION HYDRIC r _ �` •� PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE' . 14 SUBSTRATUM YES •. E e. �.. .I 4 21 BOCA FINE SAND } NOTES THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. - F SURVEY COURTESY OF: "NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE" SURVEY DATED: MM-DD-YYYY - - DESIGNED: TH REVISION: TAB NAME: SOILS Tuffell & Associates, Inc. RUSSELL SQUARE DRAWN BY: RMJ N/A SHEET: 06 Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 03-05-18 N/A SCALE: AS SHOWI 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SOILS MAP JOB NO.: 1354 N/A Email:tuna@tunell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION -9 TOWNSHIP - Packet Pg. 951 wry A 0 400 200 4 { ' _ SCA{'Z 9N IFEE7 4 + E Irk . F N J�; ► L Th h .-Ji- Y y r r' �• y yy t' •-� llq .114 !i s _ �" C ',�• O s. - N r a 00 rL M ' .. E z • # r �. v CODE DESCRIPTION HYDRIC r _ �` •� PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE' . 14 SUBSTRATUM YES •. E e. �.. .I 4 21 BOCA FINE SAND } NOTES THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. - F SURVEY COURTESY OF: "NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE" SURVEY DATED: MM-DD-YYYY - - DESIGNED: TH REVISION: TAB NAME: SOILS Tuffell & Associates, Inc. RUSSELL SQUARE DRAWN BY: RMJ N/A SHEET: 06 Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 03-05-18 N/A SCALE: AS SHOWI 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SOILS MAP JOB NO.: 1354 N/A Email:tuna@tunell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION -9 TOWNSHIP - Packet Pg. 951 fA 9 Ifflom 107-1 M.- ", 7 � M Legend PROJECT BOUNDARY M PROPOSED PRESERVES COLLIER COUNTY PLATTED PRESERVES DRAWN BY: RM -1 REVISION: SCALE: 1 "=300 Turrell, Hall & ASSociate� Inc. CREATED: 05-22-18 N/A FILE PATH: Marine & Environmental Consulting RUSSELL SQUARE OB NO.: 1354 N/A P.\1354-Sumvt Blvd Prnp,aly\C ADJACENT PRESERVES 13,4PRFSFINu smxd 3484 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SHEET. 01 OF 01 N/A Finaif.luna@turrell-associates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax:(239)643-6632 SECTION -9 TOWNSHIP I Inc LIAN11F "r Packet Pg. 953 F 9.B.e I TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT For Russell Square RPUD (Santa Barbara Boulevard, Collier County, Florida) February 23, 2018 Revised May 17, 2018 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Pee = $500.00 TIS (Major Study) Review F'ee = $1,500.00 Prepared by: JMMD TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION No. 27S30 (PROJECT NO. 1 7061 1 ) s No 43860 ++ - r sTAY>~ of /,-41-T.� �.� DAME BA14�N P. � • � y �iT�E FLO A Rem. h{(,. Packet Pg. 954 TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Methodology 2 Scope of Project 2 Table A - Existing & Proposed Development 2 Figure 1 _ Project Location & E+C Road Classification 2.1 Master Concept Plan 2.2 Project Generated Traffic 3 Table B - Net New Trips Generated 3 Table 1 - Trip Generation Computations 3.1 Existing + Committed Road Network 4 Project Traffic Distribution 4 Area of Significant Impact 4 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 4.1 Table 2A - Area of Impact/Road Classification 4.2 Site Access Conditions 5 Table C - Build -out Traffic vs. Intersection Improvements 5 HCS Intersection Analysis 5.1 2017 thru 2023 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 6 Table 2B - 2017 & 2023 Link Volumes 6.1 Table 2C - 2023 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 6.2 1 9.B.e as L co as 3 Q: 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N O a 00 co Iq 50- M M M m r c d E a Packet Pg. 955 Conclusions Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that the proposed Russell Square RPUD will not have a significant or negative impact upon the surrounding road network. It was verified that all roadways, within the project's area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the traffic associated with the proposed residential community that will consist of 230 multi -family dwelling units and associated amenities. As determined, the road network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for the foreseeable future and the project will not create any off-site transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated. Site Access The project proposes to construct one (1) means of ingress/egress that will be located at the southern property boundary. The access will be created by extending a two-lane road (Cope Lane East) from Santa Barbara Boulevard to the site's proposed entrance/exit. The entrance road will be aligned with an existing right-in/out and left -in (u -turn) median opening on Santa Barbara Boulevard. A right ingress turn lane and left ingress turn lane (u -turn) were previously constructed at the existing median opening and the report concludes that thosc turn lanes are adequate in length to accommodate the traffic generated by Russell Square. However, what will be the left -ingress turn lane was previously defined as a u -turn lane which will require restriping to indicate a left turn lane. Also, the right turn lane was previously striped as a recovery lane which will require restriping to indicate a right turn lane. Scope of Project Russell Square is a proposed residential community that will consist of 230 multi -family dwelling units. The 32 +1- acre site is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard and approximately one-half mile south of Davis Boulevard, within Collier County. It is expected that the project will be completed by the year 2023. Table A Proposed Lana Use Proposed Land Use Number of Units Multi -Family 230 d.u.'s 2 9.B.e a Packet Pg. 956 9.B.e 1 Devonshire Blvd Radio Rood I Davis Boulevard ---------------------------------� I f a ❑ I i ------` Davis Boulevard I ��, I NOS TH I N.T.S. I 0 � I u °I o � I mi cu i °i or ❑ I C �� I 0 Co4 " i I I i I Rattlesnake Hummock -------------- ----------------- i---------- 4; \ �` .rill 7C,FN[r) ; 6 -1 -ANE ARTERIAL 4 -LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — -- — — 2 -LANE ARTERIAL 2 -LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD ` .. JMB TRANs^P17RTATICIN E"mimV ERwo. INC. Russell Square February 23, 2418 Project Location & Roadway Classification o� of0 c OIU FIGURE 1 Q 2.1 Packet Pg. 957 TAORMINA RESERVE MPUD COMMERCIAL 15' WIDE TYPE'B' — — — — — — -- — —TLANDSCAPE BUFFER ❑1 I� f �, z I TAORMINA RESERVE MPUD M 01 PRESERVE m -ten I PUD BOUNDARY ❑I ! ❑m! 9.B.e w SCALE: 1" = 200' WHEN PLOMI) C S,VX 11" d' { WATER s UFFER REQUIRED JIDE A3VAGEME k . ........ — DI YPE'D' �I t R -------------- UFFER WATERI IVAGEMENI IT,I 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' 0I 3 l LANDSCAPE BUFFER PRESERVE - . WATER MANAGEMENT 1 yF21 -i A 0 20' WIDE TYPED' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONED: A COUNTY WATER MANAGEMENT AREA M N Q O 0z z r 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' R LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONED: A RESIDENTIAL ® = DEVIATION A = AMENITY AREA I R = RESIDENTIAL AREA Packet Pg. 958 RUSSELL SQUARE RPUD auu: U-r:earN ra dyMinQ>I' Sllnnr oo�.� laces. e,n. vi,, i km REVISED •zao'a Mxr �x ", 'p Snnrm Springs, ��melrta aira4 0 05'x2'201 8 C Citi] fluoneers . band Surveyors M,91nets . Landtxape Arr-hstects EXHIBIT Cl �,wr• sail r.n. ornuu�se 000srrr ccn. orww.la ona5lar g.erxxu�epop�ea MASTER PMN "m Bartea 9lrNltQa- 289.AhT.]i49 wu-w. /JPs dr,�Ja or. e•om l'OTi•Myers- 230-M.4,"R SHIMT 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 958 9.B.e Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the project was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, I V' Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was determined that land use code "Multi -Family" (LUC 220) was most appropriate for the purpose of estimating the net new trips associated with the RPUD. As determined, Russell Square RPUD will generate 105 vph & 124 vph during the AM & PM peak hours, respectively. Table 1 depicts the computations performed in determining the total new trips. Table B provides a summary of the trip generation computation results that are shown in Table 1. Table B Site -Generated Trips (Summation of Table .I ) Daily Weekday AM Peak hour PM Peak Hour Trips Generated Trips Generated Trips Generated ADT (vph) (vph) 1,698 105 124 The report concludes that the project will generate more than 100 net new trip ends o during the weekday highest peak hour_ As such, the report investigates the traffic impacts le associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County a Government'sTraffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments generating "more Y than 100 trips", which is defined as a major study. m r c d E a Packet Pg. 959 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMMUTATIONS Russell Square Land Use Code Land Use Description 220 Multi -Family (Low Rise) Land Use Code Trip Period LUC 220 Daily Traffic (ADT) _ AM Peak Hour (vph) = PM Peak Hour {vph} Build Schedule 230 Units Trip Generation Equation T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 = Ln(T) = 0.95Ln(X)-0.51 = 23% Enter/ 77% Exit = Ln(T) = 0.89Ln(X)-0.02 = 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = 9.B.e Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 1,698 ADT 105 vph 24 /81 vph a 124 vph 78 / 46 vph N N 7 r O O O ti r O N J a N C D a 00 W v co a U m r Q �7 I Packet Pg. 960 9.B.e Existing + Committed Road Network Figure 1 and Table 2A provide a detail of the surrounding E + C road network. Table 2A depicts the minimum level of service performance standards and capacity for the roads within the project's are of influence. Santa Barbra Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard varies from a four -lane to a six -lane major arterial that has a north/south orientation between its southern terminus at its intersection with Rattlesnake Hammock Road and its northern terminus at its intersection with Green Boulevard where the roadway continues north to Immokalee Road and is known as Logan Boulevard. Between Golden Gate Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Santa Barbara Boulevard is classified as a six -lane divided arterial having a maximum service capacity of 3, 100 vphpd. Within proximity of the site, the posted speed limit of Santa Barbara Boulevard is 45 MPH. Rattlesnake Hammock Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road varies from a four -lane to a six -lane divided arterial that has an east/west orientation between its eastern terminus that extends past its intersection with C.R. 951 and its western terminus at its intersection with U.S. 41. Davis Boulevard Davis Boulevard varies from a four -lane to a six -lane divided arterial that has an east/west orientation between its eastern terminus at its intersection with C.R. 951 and its western terminus at its intersection with U.S. 41. Project Generated Traffic Distribution le The project's net new traffic was distributed to the surrounding road network based upon a logical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area, nearby businesses and recreational features, as well as growth trends for the surrounding areas. m Table 2A and Figure 2A provide a detail of the traffic distributions to the adjacent road network. Figure 2B depicts the site -generated turning movements at the project's access d on Santa Barbara Boulevard for AM & PM peak hours. z a Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2A describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the projects area impact are shown in Table 2A. 4 Packet Pg. 961 I 9.B.e I I 1 _,rw fi5__ I Devonshire Blvd I�I ----------�►r�f�.�vis Boulevard Road Dai•---------------------— -- 0 '07 II 0rp 1 dle i I c � a I I C] Davis Boulevard 257° 1 , -------------------- ----�---- �I I O r - NORTH n I a I v I b l a J � O I a or I I 'aI r 'I (p C � 0I of EP �I a I m s °I C O T I � IN Rattlesnake Hammack — -----L----------- — — — — — — — — — - a, y� LEGEND D 0. PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCE JMB TRRNSP0RTRTI0N ENGINEERING. 11M40. Russell Square February 23, 2018 PROJECT -GENERATED TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 2A Q + Packet Pg. 962 Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vphl = 15.0 Davis Boulevard County Barn to Santa Barbara 16.1 Santa Barbara to Radio Rd 16-2 Radio Rd to C.R. 951 TABLE 2A PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT 78 Entering 46 Exiting 74.0 Rattlesnake Ham. County Barn to Santa Barbara 4D D 1900 20.0% 75-0 Santa Barbara to C.R. 951 6D D 2900 10.0% 78.0 Santa Barbara Blvd Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 6D E 3100 30.0°/% 79.1 Davis Blvd to Site 6D E 3100 70.0% 79.2 Site to Rattlesnake Hammock 6D E 3100 30.0% 9.B.e LOS Service PK Dir. PK Direction Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic Class LOSv[ phpd) % Dist 4D D 2200 25.0% 6D D 2900 15.0% 6U ❑ 2900 15.0°/o 74.0 Rattlesnake Ham. County Barn to Santa Barbara 4D D 1900 20.0% 75-0 Santa Barbara to C.R. 951 6D D 2900 10.0% 78.0 Santa Barbara Blvd Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 6D E 3100 30.0°/% 79.1 Davis Blvd to Site 6D E 3100 70.0% 79.2 Site to Rattlesnake Hammock 6D E 3100 30.0% 9.B.e r Q Packet Pg. 963 d L t� Project Project: m Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project U) PK Dir Pk Hr Non -PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Signific W (yphpd) Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Im act Imp_a, 20 E 12 w 2% 0.89% NO � 12 w 7 E 2% 0.40% NO o 12 w 7 E 3% 0.40% NO ti 0 N 16 E 9 w 2% 0.82% NO a 8 w 5 E 2% 0.27% NO N 0 23 S 14 N 2% 0.75% NO d 55 5 32 N 2% 1.76% NO 00 23 N 14 5 2% 0.75% NO � CL U M m r Q Packet Pg. 963 4 1 Packet Pg. 964 Site Access Conditions The project proposes to construct one (1) means of ingress/egress that will be located at the southern property boundary. The access will be created by extending a two-lane road (referred to as Cope Lane East) from Santa Barbara Boulevard to the site's proposed entrance/exit. The entrance road will be aligned with an existing right-in/out and left -in (u -turn) median opening on Santa Barbara Boulevard. A right ingress turn lane and left ingress tam lame (u -turn) were previously constructed at the existing median opening and the report concludes that those turn lanes are adequate in length to accommodate the traffic generated by Russell Square (see turn lane analysis below). However, what will be the left -ingress turn lane was previously defined as a u -turn lane which will require restriping to indicate a left turn lane. Also, the right turn lane was previously striped as a recovery lane which will require restriping to indicate a right turn lane. Santa Barbara Boulevard has a posted speed limits of 45 MPH. Based upon FDDT's Standard Index No. 301, the total taper + deceleration lane will need to be 185' in length. The right turn lane is a free-flow condition, so no turn vehicle storage is required_ The left turn lane storage was determined based upon the criteria set forth by the Highway Capacity Manual (see HCS output on page 5.1). As determined, the southbound left turn queue will be less than 2 vehicles/hour which will require a minimum storage of 50'. Therefore, no further site access improvements are required. Table C Build -out Traffic Demands vs. Existing Intersection improvements 5 9.B.e a Packet Pg. 965 SB Left Ingress NB Right Ingress Intersection Turn Lane Turn Lane Cope Lane E. @ Existing = 340' Existing = 300' Santa Barbara Blvd Req. Decel+ Taper = 1851 Req. Decel+ Taper = 185' Reg. Storage =50' Reg, Storage = 0' 5 9.B.e a Packet Pg. 965 HCS7 Two -Way Stop -Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst JMBTransportation Eng Intersection Agency/Co. Jurisdiction Date Performed 5/17/2018 East/West Street Cope Lane East Analysis Year 2023 North/South Street Santa Barbara Blvd Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs) 0.25 Project Description Lanes. Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments fi ItyT f r Major Street North-South Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 10 11 12 7 8 9 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 1 3 0 Configuration R T R j L T Volume (veh�h) 46 787 23 10 55 1181 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 3 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade °%J 0 Right Turn Channelized No No Median Type J Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) 7.1 5.6 5-3 Critical Headway (sec) 7.10 5.66 5.30 Base Follow -Up Headway (sec) 3.9 H 2.3 3.1 Fallow -Up Headway (sec) I I I I I 3.90 2.33 3.10 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (vehlh) 48 68 Capacity, c (vehlh) 506 489 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.14 95% Queue Length, Q9; (veh) 0-3 0,5 Control Delay (slveh) 12-9 13-6 Level of Service (LDS) B B Approach Delay (Slveh) 12.9 0.7 -- Approach Los B Copyright ® 2018 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved- HCS''' TWSC Version 7.5 Generated: 5/17/2018 9:07:26 AM Cope -Santa PM Peak.xtw O W co rL 7 U M m r C m E U tv r Q 5A Packet Pg. 966 2017 thru 2023 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2017 thru 2023 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peals season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction and annual growth rates were derived from the 2017 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2023 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 2B. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2017 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The vested trips 'Y' 2023 background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 213. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2023 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 2C provides a summary of the 2017 thru 2023 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service thresholds at project build -out. 9.B.e CL M m r c d E M a Packet Pg. 967 TABLE 2B 2017 & 2023 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES 15.0 Davis Boulevard County Barn to Santa Barbara 16.1 Santa Barbara to Radio Rd 74.0 Rattlesnake Ham. County Barn to Santa Barbara 75.0 Santa Barbara to C.R. 951 78.0 Santa Barbara Blvd Radia Rd to Davis &W 79.1 Davis Blvd to Site 79.2 Site to Rattlesnake Hammock 1 Per Vested Trips Methc 9.B.e d L ca 3 a d rn 3 0 0 0 ti 0 N J IL N a rw to m a U M m c m E t U ca r r a Packet Pg. 968 Per Growth Rate Method 2023 2023 Peak Hour 2017 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips (vphpd DiR AUIR tvphodlU[ phpo)v�phpdd 1440 E 2.00% 1622 144 1584 700 E 2.00% 788 163 863 700 W 2.00% 788 40 740 490 W 2.00% 552 171 661 1350 N 3.98% 1706 213 1563 890 S 4=% 1126 112 1002 890 S 4,00% 1126 112 1002 9.B.e d L ca 3 a d rn 3 0 0 0 ti 0 N J IL N a rw to m a U M m c m E t U ca r r a Packet Pg. 968 9.B.e TABLE 2C 2023 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEXAPACITY ANALYSIS c as E U �a r r a Packet Pg. 969 2023 2023 2023 2023 202 L 2017 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Sere. Vol. Build -Out Build - Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak] PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non -PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Dire = i v[ phpd) LOS v h d Dir LOS NON fir (Vph) Diri phr�dl �yphpda �Ic Ratio i Q: N 15.0 Davis Boulevard County Barn to Santa Barbara 1440 C 1622 E C 20 E 12 W 1641 2200 0.75 C 16.1 Santa Barbara to Radio Rd 700 B 863 E B 12 W 7 E 870 2900 0-30 B 74.0 Rattlesnake Ham. County Barn to Santa Barbara lop B 788 W B 16 E 9 W 798 1900 0.42 B c 75.0 Santa Barbara to C.R- 951 490 B 651 W B S W 6 E 669 2900 0-23 B ti 78-0 Santa Barbara Blvd Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 1350 B 1706 N B 23 5 14 N 1720 31000,55 g 0 J 79.1 Davis Blvd to Site 894 B 1126 S B 55 S 32 N 1181 3100 0.38 B N 79.2 Site to Rattlesnake Hammock 890 B 1126 S B 23 N 14 S 1146 3100 D.37 B 61 a N 00 to a U M m c as E U �a r r a Packet Pg. 969 COLLIER COUNTY WAIVER APPLICATION FROM THE REQUIRED HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT DATE SUBMITTED: PLANNER: PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE WAIVER: (To Be Completed By Zoning and Land Development Review Staff) PROJECT NAME: Russell Square RPUD LOCATION: (Common Description) The subject property is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard approximately 2,000± south of Davis Boulevard SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: The proposed Russell Square RPUD grope , is approximately 32f acres, which is partially developed with two single-family residences. The Archaeological Probability Map #5, shows the project is located in an area that does not indicate areas of Historical/Archaeological probability or known sites. The project is located in Section 09, Township 50 S, Range 26 E on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard. (Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Community Development & Environmental Services Administrator County Manager or designee to waive the requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment. Once the waiver application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and acted upon within five (5) working days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate that the area has low potential for historical/archaeological sites.) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 9.B.e CL M m c d E z a Packet Pg. 970 SECTION ONE: APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DATA 9.B.e A. Name of applicant (s) (if other than property owner, state relationship such as option holder, contract purchaser, lessee, trustee, etc.): Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC Mailing Address: 28100 Bonita Grande Dr., Suite 106 Phone: (239) 221-0446 FAX: E -Mail: danc(a,nealcommunities.com B. Name of agent(s) for applicant, if any: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Mailing Address: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Phone: 239.947.1144 FAX: 239.947.0375 E -Mail: warnold(a.gradyminor.com C. Name of owner(s) of property: Please see attached Property Owner List Mailing Address: Phone: ( ) FAX: E -Mail: Note: If names in answers to A and/or B are different than name in C, notarized letter(s) of authorization from property owner (C) must be attached. SECTION TWO: SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA (Attach copy of the plat book page (obtainable from Clerk's Office at the original scale) with subject property clearly marked.) A. Legal description of subject property. Answer only 1 or 2, as applicable. 1. Within platted subdivision, recorded in official Plat Books of Collier County. Subdivision Name: Plat Book Page Unit Tract Lot Section 09 Township 50S Range 26 E 2. If not in platted subdivision, a complete legal description must be attached which is sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property on County maps or aerial Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 2 Packet Pg. 971 9.B.e photographs. The legal description must include the Section, Township and Range. If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description may describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has the right to reject any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property, and may require a certified survey or boundary sketch to be submitted. B. Property dimensions: C. F Area: square feet, or 32± acres Width along roadway: 1,350± feet (Santa Barbara Boulevard) Depth: 1,250± feet Present use of property: Residential and undeveloped Present zoning classification: A, Agricultural SECTION THREE: WAIVER CRITERIA Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has been excavated. A. Waiver Request Justification. a 1. Interpretation of Aerial Photograph Photo shows property developed with two single-family residences and undeveloped lands. 0° r c d 2. Historical Land Use Description: Residential. z 3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: The site contains two a single-family residences and vegetation. 4. Other: B. The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by an accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the cost of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist. The decision of the County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a decision of Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 Packet Pg. 972 9.B.e the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal to the Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation Board regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION FOUR: CERTIFICATION A. The applicant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this application. Any time delays or additional expenses necessitated due to the submittal of inaccurate or incomplete information shall be the responsibility of the applicant. B. All information submitted with the application becomes a part of the public record and shall be a permanent part of the file. C. All attachments and exhibits submitted shall be of a size that will fit or conveniently fold to fit into a legal size (8 1/2" x 14") folder. r -L--) (i - Signature of Applicant or Agent D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed Name of Applicant or Agent -TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION - SECTION FIVE: NOTICE OF DECISION The County Manager or designee has made the following determination: ❑ Approved on: Lo ❑ Approved with Conditions on: By: (see attached) Denied on: _ (see attached) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 IRM 4 Packet Pg. 973 SB 32 RPUD (PL20170004414) Parcel Number Owner 00407520002 Cross and Thompson LLC 00407720006 John D. Bruce 00407840009 Cross and Thompson LLC 00407960002 Cross and Thompson LLC 00408120003 Robert Tetrault Rev Trust & Kathleen M Tetrault Rev Trust 00408200004 Cross and Thompson LLC 00408360009 Cross and Thompson LLC January 9, 2018 Property Owner List.docx © GradyMinor Civil 6nglnecrs • Land 8urvcynrs • Planners • I andscape Amh%xts 9.B.e Page 1 of 1 Packet Pg. 974 32 Acre Santa Barbara Property 9.B.e E m L CO T CD 0 ti T 0 N J a N O a 00 w Iq 50- M m m r c m E z c� a © GradyMinor 370 185 0 370 Feet Civil Rngtnem • [,and Surveyors •Planners s Landscape Arch€torts Packet Pg. 975 RNG 26 1 RNG 27 31 32 3334 35 36 31 32 VANDERBILT BEACH RI AT 3 1 6 5 5 4 2 6 GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD g 10 11 12 7 8 PINE RIDGE ROAD 17 16 15 14 13 SUR EY 616 K 20 21 22 23 24 19 4 Il 30 29 27 26 25 28 919 - INTERSTATE 75 34 35 36 31 32 33 SR. B4 ALLIGATOR ALLEY I-75 CR 058 RADIO ROAD - 2 1 6 5 6 5 q 3 SR. 84 DAVIS BLVD. 7 8 g d 11 12 7 8 Subject Property 1— tae ® PREVIOUSLY SURVEYED AREA INDICATES AREAS OF HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL INDICATES HISTORIC STRUCTURE (NOT TO SCALE) INDICATES ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE (NOT TO SCALE) INDICATES HISTORIC DISTRICT 9.B.e TWP 48 TWP 49 i VI fn fn NN3 1.1. r O O O ti T O N J a N 0 7 a 00 to Iq O CL 7 Y V m m C d E t 0 m ++ a VWP 49 CWP 50 BELLE MEADE NW QUADRANGLE AREAS OF HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROBABILITY O Packet Pg. 976 .�$trict School q o � as �44"Collier Cou�'� 9.B.e Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [�] type of application request (one only): F✓ School Capacity Review ❑ Exemption Letter QConcurrency Determination 0 Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, Project Name: Russell Square RPUD Project Information: Municipality: Collier county Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): see Property owner List Location/Address of Subject property: East side of Santa Barbara Blvd., 1/4 mile south of Davis Blvd. Closest Major Intersection: Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner/(.contract Purchaser Name(S): Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC (Contract Purchaser) Agent/Contact Person: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of 0. Grady Minor and Associaties, P.A. (Attach location map) (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Telephone#: 239.947.1144 Fax: Email warnold@gradyminor.com I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Owner or Authorized Agent Signature III. Development Information February 21, 2018 Date Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Urban Residential, Urban Mixed Use Residential Proposed Land Use Designation: Urban Residential, Urban Mixetl Use Residential Current Zoning: A, Agricultural (ST Overlay) Project Acreage: Proposed Zoning: Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Unit Type: SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: 6.5 0 Total Units Proposed by Type: 0 230 Is this a phasedproject: Yes or No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp: CL U cc r c m E a r r Q Packet Pg. 977 Worksheet is required to be completed by the Applicant only if the project is to be phased: Unit Type Yrl Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ Years 25 SF MF 50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MH N/A MF C N/A G N/A MH Totals by Yr 75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- C G Totals by Yr Grand Total Insert totals by unit type by years. Unit Types: SF = Single Family MF = Multi-Family/Apartments MH = Mobile Homes C = Condo/Co-Op G = Government EXAMPLE: Unit Type Yrl Yr2 I Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 YO Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ Years SF 25 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MF 50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MH N/A C N/A G N/A Totals by Yr 75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Grand Total Grand Total 1 150 9.B.e L 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N a 00 to v a CO c aD E �a r a 2 Packet Pg. 978 9.B.e Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: - School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; - Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency Determination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. as a as N 7 0 0 0 ti 0 N J IL N 0 IL 00 W co CL U M m r c as E U M r Q Packet Pg. 979 32 Acre Santa Barbara Property 9.B.e E m L CO T CD 0 ti T 0 N J a N O a 00 w Iq 50- M m m r c m E z c� a © GradyMinor 370 185 0 370 Feet Civil Rngtnem • [,and Surveyors •Planners s Landscape Arch€torts Packet Pg. 980 9.B.e Russell Square RPUD (PL20170004414) Deviation Justification 1. Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height, to allow a temporary banner sign up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and 8 feet in height. The temporary banner sign shall be limited to a maximum of 90 days during season defined as November 1 to April 30 per calendar year. This Deviation will remain valid until 90% of the units are sold or until December 31, 2024, whichever comes first. At such time, the Deviation will be void. Justification: The proposed deviation will allow for a banner sign located on the proposed wall along Santa Barbara Boulevard in order to advertise new homes available within the community. The 4 square foot banner sign permitted by the LDC provides minimal visibility and likely will be difficult to read by motorists travelling along Santa Barbara Boulevard, a 45 mph 6 -lane roadway. Additionally, the applicant is requesting that the banner be allowed for up to 90 days per calendar year to allow display throughout the peak winter season for home sales. Due to the property's location on a busy road and high travel speeds along the roadway. The Applicant is seeking an increase to the allowable banner size to ensure visibility of this new community. The requested banner size is in accordance with deviations approved for similar residential projects throughout the County. 2. Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5.a, which requires on -premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from edge of roadway paved surface or back of curb, to allow a setback of 5' from edge of roadway paved surface or back of curb. This deviation excludes public roads. Justification: This deviation will provide locational flexibility for directional signage internal to the RPUD. A unified design theme will be utilized for all signage throughout the community, thereby ensuring a cohesive appearance and increased aesthetic appeal. All directional signage will meet the Clear Sight Distance requirements in accordance with LDC Section 60.06.05. Furthermore, this deviation is typical of many of the master -planned August 8, 2018 Page 1 of 5 NCSBPE Deviation Justification-rev4.docx ® GradyMinor CMi V,nglnccr,; • I,anr€ Sone.}nrs • Planners • lo Rdsca p(, Am.httccts Packet Pg. 981 9.B.e Russell Square RPUD (PL2017OOO4414) Deviation Justification developments throughout Collier County. All roads and drives will be privately owned and maintained. 3. Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.1.a and 5.03.02.C, Fences and Walls, Excluding Sound Walls, which requires fences or walls in a residential PUD to be 6 feet or less in height, to permit an 8 -foot high wall on top of berm along Cope Lane right-of-way and 12 foot high wall on top of the required water management berm along the Santa Barbara Boulevard right-of-way. Justification: The additional wall height is necessary to provide a buffer from the adjacent 6 -lane traffic noise and the ground must be altered to meet water management criteria. The wall height is consistent with the wall height constructed for Falling Waters west of Santa Barbara Boulevard due to noise concerns associated with the 6-laning of Santa Barbara Boulevard. 4. Deviation 4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.6 (a) and 5.06.02.B.6 (b), On -premises Sign Within Residential Districts, which permits two ground signs at a maximum height of 8 feet with a sign face area not to exceed 64 square feet and a minimum setback from all property lines and road right-of-way of 10 feet, to permit two signs, not at the project entrance, of up to 80 square feet (per sign face) to be located along the Santa Barbara Boulevard frontage of the property on the project's wall and to exceed the maximum sign height of 8 feet for a maximum of 12 feet in height measured from the adjacent roadway centerline elevation with a minimum setback of zero feet from the property line. This Deviation is conditioned upon owner's relocation of the wall and sign at its own expense, in the event it conflicts with a County road expansion or project. Justification: The project access will be located on Cope Lane and not Santa Barbara Boulevard. Cope Lane is not a through street and project signage is not visible at the project entrance for motorists traveling on Santa Barbara Boulevard, the arterial roadway located along the project's western boundary. Providing signage on Santa Barbara Boulevard will meet the intent of the Collier County Sign Code by lessening hazards to pedestrians and motorists August 8, 2018 Page 2 of 5 NCSBPE Deviation Justification-rev4.docx ® Gradyklinor CMi V,nglnccr,; • I,anr€ Son-e}nrs • Planners • lo Rdsca p(, Am.httccts Packet Pg. 982 9.B.e Russell Square RPUD (PL2017OOO4414) Deviation Justification by providing project identification signs in a visible location along the project's frontage to aid residents and guests in identifying the project. Santa Barbara Boulevard is a 6 -lane arterial roadway with high travel speeds. Having the additional signage square footage is essential for visibility and readability for motorists. The height of the signage will be consistent with the proposed wall height on which it is proposed to be located. 5. Deviation 5 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.2, Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires dual sidewalks on local roads internal to the site, to allow a sidewalk on one side of the roadway where the property is permitted with single loaded home sites. Appropriate crosswalks shall be provided at crossing locations. Justification: A portion of the PUD will be developed with homes located on only one side of the internal street. This internal street segment is approximately 255 feet in length. No residents would have direct access to a sidewalk in this location; therefore, eliminating the need for a sidewalk in this location of the PUD. Appropriate crossroads will be provided to provide safe street cross walks at each street crossing. 6. Deviation 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.A.5, Preservation Standards, which requires preservation areas shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off- site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, to allow the onsite preserves to be non- contiguous. Justification: The proposed project site is composed of several parcels, which have been previously impacted by residential and agricultural uses. The highest quality remaining native habitats are not contiguous on the project site and are actually located at opposite sides of the site. One area is a small wetland on the western boundary of the site that was left in place during the construction of Santa Barbara Blvd and the other proposed preserve area is a wetland on the east side of the site that will remain contiguous with the platted preserves adjacent to the property. Both of these wetland areas are jurisdictional to the Corps of Engineers and are being preserved to meet the avoidance and minimization criteria of the Corps and the SFWMD. Both areas meet the hierarchal criteria of the Collier August 8, 2018 Page 3 of 5 NCSBPE Deviation Justification-rev4.docx ® Gradyklinor CMi V,nglnccr,; • I,anr€ Son-eynrs • Planners • lo Rdsca p(, Am.httccts Packet Pg. 983 9.B.e Russell Square RPUD (PL20170004414) Deviation Justification County LDC 3.05.07.A.4 and will provide greater assurances of viable habitat areas as opposed to trying to restore agricultural pasture or residential areas around the wetland to meet the County required acreage. 7. Deviation 7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.08.B.2.a.i and 5.05.08.B.2.c.i, Architectural and Site Design Standards, which requires where a proposed project site located within 150 to 300 feet of an arterial or collector road , including all rights-of-way , shall be required to comply with LDC sections 5.05.08 D.4., D.10., D.13., D.15., E, and F. Compliance shall be limited to the building fagades facing the arterial or collector road to allow the buildings behind a wall to not be subject to this LDC requirement. Justification: This Section of the LDC would be applicable to a building located in the amenity area of the project. It is the intent of the developer to install solid walls on their Santa Barbara Boulevard and Cope Lane property boundaries. The wall along Santa Barbara Boulevard will be 12 feet in height, making the amenity building largely impossible for the public to see. Requiring additional architectural embellishments for the amenity building is unnecessary. 8. Deviation 8 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.G, Parking Space Requirements, which requires where small-scale recreation facilities are accessory to a single-family or multifamily project and intended only for the residents of that project, exclusive of golf courses/clubhouses, the recreation facilities may be computed at 50 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are not within 300 feet of the recreation facilities and at 25 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities, to allow the parking space for the recreation facilities to be computed at 25 percent where the majority of dwelling units are within 500 feet of the recreation facilities. Justification: The project will have sidewalks throughout allowing residents the ability to walk to the project amenity area. Parking on-site will be provided. It has been this developers August 8, 2018 Page 4 of 5 NCSBPE Deviation Justification-rev4.docx ® Gradyklinor CMi V,nglnccr, • I,anr€ Son-eynrs • Planners • lo Rdsca p(, Am.httccts Packet Pg. 984 9.B.e Russell Square RPUD (PL20170004414) Deviation Justification experience that the proposed reduction in required parking provides ample on-site parking for residents and guests and that the LDC requirement results in excess parking for the on-site amenity area. 9. Deviation 9 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, Table 2.4, Buffer Requirements, which reauires a 15' wide tvpe "B" landscape buffer to allow no buffer in the areas adiacent to the Taormina Reserve PUD preserve area as depicted on the Master Plan. Justification: This deviation is justified due to the location of the proposed Russell Square preserve area and its adjacency to the preserve areas located within the Taormina Reserve PUD. Providing a landscape buffer either between the preserve areas, or adjacent to the preserve on the Russell Square property provides no benefit to either PUD. the nearest sinele familv development tract in Taormina Reserve is over 800 feet awav with preserve areas located between the Russell Square multi -family tract and the single family tract in Taormina Reserve. Please see attached exhibit identifying the distances between the Russell Square RPUD and Taormina Reserve development tracts. August 8, 2018 Page 5 of 5 NCSBPE Deviation Justification-rev4.docx © GradyM[nor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Iandscape AwhRcds Packet Pg. 985 9.B.e AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petition PUDZ-PL20170004414, Russell Square Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses ofproperty owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the elate, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and Copy �f newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance:_— (Signature of Applicant) State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 5th day of May, 2018 by Sharon Clmpenhour, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. omq(-VQ(;��f� ( igna e of Not Publi Joanne Janes Printed Name of Notary G:WIM Procedures/davit Of Compliance -NIM May 10 2018.Docx (Notary Seal) irA••,: JOANNE JAHES ,= MY COMMISSION # GG 187425 ;r d EXPIRES: Mardi 14, 2022 • 'oF si�Q' Bonded Thru /tat Public Undenw{ters Packet Pg. 986 9.B.e GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects April 20, 2018 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM); PUDZ-PL20170004414, Russell Square Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Dear Sir or Madam: A formal application has been submitted to Collier County, seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezone, by Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC (Applicant), represented by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., for the following described property: The subject property is comprised of approximately 32.9± acres, located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, approximately % mile south of Davis Boulevard in Section 09, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC is asking the County to approve this application, which proposes to rezone the property from the A, Agricultural (ST -Overlay) Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District to permit a maximum of 230 dwelling units. Residential amenities will be provided on-site for the use of residents of the RPUD. Access to the site is from proposed Cope Lane. You are invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting hosted by the applicant to inform a nearby property owners, neighbors and the public of the proposed PUD amendment for the subject property. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it m is not a public hearing, and will be held on Thursday, May 10, 2018, 5:30 pm at Shepherd of the Glades Lutheran Church, Fellowship Hall, 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd, Naples, FL 34113. E If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by e-mail, phone, fax or mail to: Q sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Sincerely, 01 t__ Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 www.gradyminor.com Packet Pg. 987 0 0. F RrjyS'� 4Qd O e � 6i�29 Nees N Davis BLVDDAVIS BLVD Va/ ay P'esO �desDR Ma iroCIR 0 � x n � Leadership LN LVD ti, Q SUBJECT I PROPERTY m a cc) '' w c WE (n + c � S Project Location Map 9.B.e a Packet Pg. 988 P1201]0004414 500' 3/29/2018 Page 1 of 3 NAMEI 7401 ALABAMA LLC ADAMS. ROBERT E & 5 NAN ALSERTSSON, SUSANNE K C 1994 E CROWN POINTE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112-0000 510 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 510 8 50 26 ALFONSI, SAMUEL P&DELIAP 104 E MEMPHIS AVE WILDWOOD CREST, NJ 08260--0000 4010 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4030 8 50 26 ALLBERRY, ROBERT W&AJOAN 22185 HERON CV ELKHART, IN 46516---651] 4706WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 47060R 2033 PG 542 8 50 26 AVRIGIAN, MASON CYNTHIA D DOYLE-AVRIGIAN 1165 PINETOWN RD FORT WASHINGTON,PA 19034--1]01 4602 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4602 8 50 26 RAACK TR,DUANEM&PEGGYE BACH USI, ROBERT5 & CAROLYN K 2964AKRON CT 867] RNOX RD DENVER, CO 80238DOW4804 CIARKSTON, MI 68348-1]25 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4804 1103 FALLING WATERS IIA CONDOMINIUM 1103 8 50 26 8 50 26 BALIOTR, ANNE BA LOU, RANDALL I BARONE,TIMOTHY IO HN P BALIO TR EST 25015ANOY LN 215428 DOVERSTONE STREET 2415 HIDDEN LAKE DR APT 9 NAP LES, FL 34112-2777 NAP LES, FL 34112-2721 BON ITA SPRINGS, FL 34135--0000 4809 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4809 9502651/20FNW1/40FNE1/40FSW1/45ACOR1464PG1278 4704 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4]048 8 50 26 9 50 26 50 26 BASS MIYARA FLORIDA TRUST BECCACCIO, DANIEL M BECKER, HOWARD &CAROL 2415 HIDDEN LAKE DRAPTI DEBORAH I BECCACCI0 2331HIDDEN LAKEDR#1 6903 MARY JOY CT NAPLES, FL 34112-2777 CLEVES, OR 45002 -DOW NAPLES,FL 34112-0000 4801 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT4801 401 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 401 4001 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4001 8 50 26 8 50 26 8 50 26 BELL REV Q/S TRUST 1542 E GREENBRIDGE RD 0]ARK, M065721-]668 4505 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUMUNIT4505 8 50 26 BENCIN,EDWARDS&KARENA 5964 WHITEFORD DRIVE HIGHIAND HEIGHTS, OH 44143--0000 4303 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4303 8 50 26 BERLINGHIERI FLORIDA INVSTMNT PROPERTIES LLC 3495 LAUREL GREENS LANE S#202 NAPLES, FL 34119-0000 4409 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UN IT 4409 8 50 26 BET2, JOHN R&NANCY P BIANCO, IOHN I&ANTOINETTE 57 WHITE CLIFFS DRIVE STINALN PLYMOUTH, MA 02360-0000 MOUNTSINAI,NY 117615-3015 4003 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4003 1006 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1006 8 50 26 8 50 26 BINNS, JOAN BLU M, JOHN&BARBARA 2420 HIDDEN LAKE DR#9 2312 HIDDENI EDR#6 NAPLES, FL 34112-0000 NAP LES,FL 34112-0000 1009 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1009 8015 FALLING WATERSIIACONOOMINIUM8015 8 50 26 8 50 26 BOSACROBERTB&SUSANM 2335 HIDDEN LAKE DR An NAP LES,FL 34112-8]41 4006 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4006 8 50 26 BOY E, TIMOTHY&JEAN DENISE 21111!DDENLAKEDRAPT9 NAP LES,FL 34112-2757 409 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 409 8 50 26 BNADSH—,ANNE 2335 HID DEN LAKE DR APT B NAPLES, FL 34112-8]45 4008 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4008 8 50 26 BRODEUR, VINCENT R&IRENE] 1761LBERTST WARWICK,RI 02886---0403 1007 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 100] 8 50 26 BRUCE, JOHND 2402SUNSETBLVD NAPLES, FL 34112-2]08 95026 PI OF NE1/40F NWI/40F SWI/45 AC OR 192] PG 1840 9 50 26 BUHLFAMILYTRUST 56 END I COTT STREET EAST WEYMOUTH, MA 02189--0000 310 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 310 8 5026 RURNS,SHIRLEYG BYRNE, MICHAEL 2415 HIDDEN LAKE DRAPTS SYLVIE IATULIPPE 2016 CHERINGTON CRESCENT NAPLES, FL 34112-2777 OTTAWA, ON CANADA K4A4Z8 4805 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 480508 2001 PG 195 308 FALLINGWATERS IIA CONDOMINIUM 308 8 50 26 8 50 26 CAFARELL, FRANCES E CAPALBO, ANTHONY D&DONNA M 26WHITEOAKLN CHRISTINE CAPALBO 15 MYRTLE PL FAIRPORT, NY 14450-2828 EASTCHESTER, NY 10709-2010 408 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 408 466 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4606 8 50 26 8 50 26 CARLIN ET AL, CLAUDETTE CARTER,DANIELM&CONSTANCEP 23915 HI ODEN LAKE DR#SIR 1209 KENSINGTON DR NAPLES,FL 34112-2765 MUNDELEI N, IL BWEO--1095 910 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 910 909 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 909 8 50 26 8 50 26 CASASSA, CHARLES M&NOREEN0 16 TINKERS LEDGE RD DU%BURY, MA 01333-0302 4510 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 45308 50 26 CHALKER REVOCABLE TRUST 2365 HIDDEN LAKE DR#30 NAP LES, FL 34112-0000 4310 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4330 8 50 26 CH AS E, RICHARD N&LINNEAC 2497 SANDY LN NAP LES, FL 34112-2721 95026 N3/20F NW1/40F NEI/40F SWI/45 AC OR 1123 PG 1468 9 50 26 CHETKOWSKI, JANE DOROTHY KATHLEEN FRANCES ASLIN 2375 HIDDEN LAKE DR APT 3 NAPLES, FL 34112-7740 4403 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4403 8 50 26 CHILMERAN, ALLEN H 1813 PRELUDE DRIVE VIENNA, VA 22182- WW 508 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 508 8 50 26 CH NYE TR, OWEN 1&EDNAM UTO 6/26107 BOTH TRUSTS 3726EMRASSY DR WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401--1045 3904 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 3904 8 50 26 CHOW, SUSAN CLARENCETRUST STEFANO SCOPACASA 1900 RUSH LIKE TRL APT 124 18 BLUE HERON DR ORANGEVILLE, ON CANADA L9W 5K5 NEW BRIGHTON,MN 55112---1518 4702 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4702 709 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 709 8 50 26 8 50 26 CLARR,AIAN1 2348 HIDDEN LAKE DR An IO NAPLES, FL 34112-27153 710 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 710 8 50 26 CLARRE, GERARD C&BRIDGETA 2230 COUNTRY CLUB DR PITTSBURGH, PA 15205-8716 1109 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1109 8 50 26 CIAUPEIN, GEORGE J&MARJORIE 2329 HIDDEN LAKE DR APT IO NAPLES, FL 34112-8714 39W WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3930 8 50 26 COHEN,LRRRYS&JOANL 9655WOOMDRUNIT1511 SKOKIE,IL 60077-431 4302 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4102 8 50 26 COLUERCNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAG EMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 301 NAPLES,FL 34112-00011 85026 N3/20F 11/2 OF E1/20F SE1/40F NEI/40F SEI/41.25 AC 8 50 26 CO 01 JOSEPH&CARMELIA PO BOX 1966 OGUNQUIT, ME 0390]---00110 4608 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4608 8 50 26 COM PORT, RICHARD B&MARYP 1248ROADSTONEDR MARS, PA 16046-5202 1004 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1004 8 50 26 CONTI, MICHAEL & LOIS M 44 PARK LANE M22 PARK RIDGE, IL 60068--0000 908 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 908 8 50 26 CORBY, CARLR MICHAELJ05EPH CORBY KATHY ATENNEY C/O MICHAEL CORBY 65 FAIRVIEW DR LEICESTER, MA 01524---0000 503 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 503 8 50 26 COX,CLYOET&MARYB HEDGES FAMILYIRREVTRUST 8231 POTOMAC LN NAPLES, FL 34104-654] 505 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 5058 50 26 CRISPELLTR, NILES&JUDITHA IUDITH A CRISPELLTRUST DATEDO7117/95 2348 HIDDEN LAKE DR APT 2 NAP LES, FL 34112-2713 702 FALLING WATERS I I A CONDOMINI UM 7D2 8 50 26 CROSS AN D THOM PSON LLC CUNNI NGHAM, HARRY V 13190 OLD LIVINGSTON RD PO BOX 1062 NAP LES, FL 34109-0000 NAGS HEAD, NC 27959DOW4507 9502651/20F NI OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 LESS THAT PORTION AS DESC IN OR 4337 PG 541 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT4507 9 50 26 8 50 26 DELVECCHIO,EMIUO&ROSE 306 PROCTOR AVENUE REVERE, MA 02151 925 411 WATER CREST A CONOOMI NIUMUNII 4609 8 5026 DEMSKIEEST,JOHN M %USBANK PO BOX 64142 ST PAUL,MN 55164--0000 4110 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT4110 8 50 26 DERBY, WILLIAM E&NANNEA 2329 HIDDEN LAKE DR An 2 NAP LES, FL 34112-8713 3902 WATER CRESTA CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3902 8 50 26 DIELENHEINIR,J000SF GERALDINE ANN DIELENHEIN 2375HIDDEN LAKE DR #1 NAPLES,FL 34112-7740 4403 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4401 8 50 26 DINAGGIO,MAXINEL 1916 MATTIS ST HELLERTOWN, PA 18055---2813 4508 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4508 8 50 26 DUDEK,SUSANT DUNNING, ROSE MAR I E DURGIN, CARL CLYDE 5800 NASH DRIVE 2355 HIDDEN LAKE DR An S DOROTHEA MIRA DURGIN 17 CANDLEWOOD DRIVE PIPERSVILLE,PA 1894]-0000 NAPLES, FL 34112-]590 DA BURY, CT 015811-0000 4005 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4005 4205 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4205 1010 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1010 8 50 26 8 50 26 8 50 26 DWYER,VERONICAK DYKSTRA LIVI NG TRUST EDWARDDSCHMIDTIR&KATHLEEN 2375 HI ODEN LAKE DRIVE#7 2329 HIDDEN LAKE DRIVE H SCHMI DT JOINT REV LIVTRUST 31135YLVIA STREET NAP LES, FL 34112-0000 NAP LES, FL 34112-0000 HARRISON TWP, MI 48045-0000 4407 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4407 3901 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3901 407 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 407 8 50 26 8 50 26 8 50 26 ED WAR DRCHEVALIERTRUST 2375 HIDDEN LAKE DR#10 NAPLES, FL 34112-7742 4410 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4430 8 50 26 ERICA M YOUNG DEC TRUST 13305 HIGHGOAL DR WHEELING, IL 60090--5944 904 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM I. 8 50 26 EVES, CYNTHIA M&RICHARD VICTORIA EVES 31 IAKESHORE RD BEACONSFIELD, QC CANADA H9W4H5 803 FALL INGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 801 8 50 26 FABIANOVALUDMIIA 102WI NDING RIDGE RD WHITEPLAINS,NY 10603---2852 810 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 810 8 50 26 FAL LING WATERS MASTER ASSN INC %SANDCASTLE COMM MGMT :MGALLERIACT#201 NAP LES,FL 34109-0000 2 FALLING WATERS REPIAT E 565.38FTOFTRACT'DI AND THAT PORTION AS DESC IN OR4452 PG 2890 8 50 26 FAL LING WATERS MASTER ASSO INC FARGANO, IOSEPH V FARREU., MICHAEL C/OSANDCASTLECOMMMGMT 90 ROLLING MEADOW DR LORI COFFEY 9150 GALLERIA CT#201 2395 HIDDEN LAKE DR A601 NAPLES, FL 34109-0000 HOLLISTON, MA 01746---2630 NAP LES, FL 34112-0000 85026 W1/2 OF SEl/40F NEl/4 OF SE1/4 LESS NLY 307 R/W 4109 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UN!T4109 461 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4601 8 50 26 8 50 26 8 50 26 FASOLO, PIETRINAP FENIELLO, MARK FI ELDS, DONALD E&JEAN NE 2372 HIDDEN LAKE DR APT 9 SHARONAFENIELLO 5.OAKHU RST AVE 86 APPLEBY AVE NAPLES, FL 34112-27152 SOUTH RIVER, NJ 08882--0000 H RD,KY 41701-1761 809 FALLING WATERS IIACONDOMINIUM 809 4307 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 430711 9 50 26 SI/20F SW1/4OF NW1/40F SW1/4, LESS W 3OOFT+I SOFT OF E 324.08FT 2.23 AC OR 1109 PG 1691 8 50 26 26 9 50 26 FI RMI N, MARY ROBERT W FI RM IN IR PO BOX 152 EAST E, CT 06333DOW309 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 304 8 50 26 FOLGER, MARIA&THOMAS 4PIGALLE STREET TOMS RIVER, NJ 08]5]---0000 4208 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4208 8 50 26 FOLGERROBERTT & LUCY M 121 W 38TH ST BAYONNE, NJ 07002-1931 1008 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1008 8 50 26 FORD,JOHN 3MATTHEW DR FRANKLIN, MA 02038---1281 502 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 502 8 50 26 FRANCO,THOMASC GA UTHIER,CHARLE55&JERI1 GEORGOPULOS, PETER & REBECCA GILLES,WOLFGANG 216 GOLDFINCH DRIVE 2329 HIDDEN LAKE DR 1027MADISON STREET %GERMAN SERVICES 39150 RADIO RD#208 RICKETTSTOWN, NJ 0]840--0000 NAPLES, FL 34112-0000 LOCKPORT, IL 150441---0000 NAP LES, FL 34104-0000 606 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 606 3909 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3909 602 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 602 402 FALLINGWATERSIIACONDOMINIUM402 8 50 26 8 50 26 8 50 26 8 50 26 GILLES, WOLFGANG GIRARDSTRAUS REVOCABIETRUST GROSSO, LUCI LLE 3960 RADIO ROAD SUITE 208 438 CANAL WAYW 2395 HID DEN LAKE DR APT IO NAPLES, FL 34104-0000 BETHANY BEACH, DE 19930-9008 NAPLES, FL 34112-2700 1002 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1002 4307 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4107 4610 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4630 8 50 26 8 50 26 8 50 26 HAGENMILLER, EDWARD MARY ELLEN HAGENMILLER 240 CLEVELAND DRIVE CENTERPORT, NY 11721-0000 4810 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4830 8 50 26 HANCOCK,JOHN&ANTANINAC 14738E WAGNER RD BUCHANAN, MI 49107-9303 608FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 608 8 50 26 HAN NIGAN,LILLIAN LILLIAN A HANNIGAN TRUST UTD 5-19-93 2250 HIDDEN LAKE DR APT I NAPLES, FL 34112-2759 303 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 301 8 50 26 HAPPY SIX LLC, THE 3370 OBCOa OAVTON,OH 45414- WCO 306 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 306 8 50 26 HARPER, CARL E&NANCY HEI ER, THOMAS & BETTINA 520VERHILLRD WERNER&ANDREA KERL 2420 HIDDEN LAKE DR APT 3 WARREN, RI 02885---2904 NAPLES, FL 34112-2758 4304 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4304 1003 FALLING WATERS I I A CONDOMINI UM 1003 8 50 26 8 50 26 9.B.e 00 to Q V �m W }F E V 2 �F �F Q Packet P9. 989 -01-114414 500' 3/29/2018 Page 2 of 3 HEINLL ROBERTG HICKEY, ALICEM HI DDE N LAKE TRUST HIGHIANDPROPOFLEE&COWER 1319HI DDE, LAKEDR#] PO BOX 118 358 LITTLE AVE III 6980 SANDALWOOD LN 1KING5 ROW DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34112-0000 EAST DENNIS, MA 02641DOW307 BARRIE, ON CANADA IAN 2. NAPLES, FL 34109-0514 3907 WATER CRESTA CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3907 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 307 1301 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1101 9 50 26 SEL/40F NWI/440 AC 0R 1116 PG 333 8 50 26 8 50 26 8 50 26 9 50 26 HO AN, NEIL DEBORAH KEZBER 223 LOXLEY AVE BEACONSFIELD, QC CANADA H9W1K9 604 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 609 8 50 26 HOLLEIN, DAVID A&MARIEN 101 OLD DUNDEE RO BARRINGTON, IL 60010---511] 4406 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4406 8 50 26 HORACCHRISTINA 54 JOHNSON ST THORNHILL,ON CANADA 13T2N 4207 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 420] 8 50 26 HUBECDIETER&HELGA ]]]ASPEN RD PICKERING, ON CANADA L1V3P4 ILIO FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1110 8 50 26 JADHEC TR ET AL, LAWRENCE A IACKSON,MARKC ID SO MAC LN 149NORTH ELDORADO SCHAUMBURG, IL 60193---1662 RANKAKEE,IL 60901-0000 803 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 803 4803 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4803 8 50 26 8 50 26 IAMES,JEAN IASPER, VICTORIA M&THOMASW 2348HIDDE,IAKEDRAPT3 19490EERFIELD DR NAPLES, FL 34112-2763 SAUKVILLE, WI 53080---120] 703 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 103 1105 FALLING WATERS I I A CONDOMINI UM 1105 8 50 26 8 50 26 JAWORSKY, WALTER&GAILM 252 SEI BERLING DRIVE SAGA MORE HILLS,OH 44067--0000 4701 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4701 8 50 26 LOAN M COSBEY S/D/OF TRUST IU NEM POPKE TRUST 328 GILMORE LN 2396 HIDDEN LAKE DR #1 COLUMBIA, IL 62236-3314 NAP LES, FL 34112-0000 4603 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4603 906 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 906 8 50 26 8 50 26 LUST DU CRY REV LIV TRUST 2775 SUNSET BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112-2713 195026 N3/20F SEl/40F NWI/40F SWI/4, LESS W 3DFT 9 50 26 KAIMAIA LAND TRUST 52228S0UTHVIEWRIDGE MACOM B,MI 48042DOW4405 WATERCRESTACONDOMINIUM UNIT4405 8 50 26 KEN DRICCDANIELA 231 HIDDEN LAKE DRIVE #6 NAP LES, FL 34112-0000 4506 WATER CREST A CONDOM INIUMUNIT 4506 8 50 26 KERL, WERNER AN SCHOLZ ANDREAS KERL 2324 HIDDEN TAKE DR APT S NAPLES, FL 34112-2766 605 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 605 8 50 26 KERN,ROSEMARYD 540 GRANDE RVIEW DRIVE #7 MILFORD, MI 48381-0000 509 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 509 8 50 26 KUPHAL MICHAEL PETER JUERGEN LINDENSTEIG9 SCHILDOW GERMANY 16552 50: FALLINGWATERSHACONDOMINIUM SOfi 8 50 26 LAGANO,]OSEPHA&CAROL 53 BEACH ROAD MASSAPEQUA, NY 11758--0000 705 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 705 8 50 26 LAMBLEY, JOHN LEAVITT, CHARLOTTE G PO BOX 11748 2415 HIDDEN LAKE DR APT. 4807 NAP LES, FL 34101-1748 NAPLES, FL 34112-2777 9502651/20F SWL/40F NEI/40F SWI/4, LESS E 30FT 4.77 AC 4807 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 41170PR 1923 PG 227] 9 50 26 8 50 26 LEMOS, LEAN LENNON,THOMASD&SANDRA 176 BI MINI CAY OF 2329 HIDDEN LAKE DR VERO BEACH, FL 32966 711D4304 NAP LES,FL 34112-8712 WATER CRESTACONDOM INIUM UNIT 9104 3908 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3908 8 50 26 8 50 26 LICITA, GRACE 2345 HI DDEN LAKE DR APT B NAPLES, FL 34112-]594 4308 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4108 8 50 26 Lo CISCO, ROBERT A ROBERT G=&EVELYN LOBOSCO 177 OLD WILMOT RD SCARSDALE, NY 10583-6162 610 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 610 8 50 26 LOM BARD FAMILY TRUST 60 MERRIMAC ST UNIT 903 AMESBURY, MA 01913---0024 706 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 706 8 50 26 LUCAS TR, RONALD & PATRICIA A LYMAN, JOHNE R A & P A LUCAS REV TRUST IOHNI MURPHY IR DATED 09/14/00 40 CIAREN D0N AVE U NIT I 2019 BROUGHAM LN MOUNT PLEASANT, WI 53406--2389 CAMBRIDGE, MA 02140---1116 4206 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4206 902 FALLING WATERS I I A CDNDOMINI UM 902 8 50 26 8 50 26 M1& B E JUNTU N EN LIV TRUST MACGREGOR, NEILE&CORA DELL 2329 HI DDEN LAKE DR 6271 EDGEBTOOK LNE NAPLES, FL 34112-8713 INDIAN HEAD PARK, IL 60525--6993 3905 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3905 903 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 903 8 50 26 8 50 26 MANGINO, ROBERT 1055 TRAILM0RE DR ROSWELLGA 30076 F000 403 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 403 8 50 26 MANOS, JAMES&MARGUERITE MARCIANO, NICHOLAS J 908 CASINO AVE CARL RE MAMOIA 18ISIVORYCANEPT CRANFORD,NJ 07016DOW4308 NAPLES, FL 34119-3384 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4308 309 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 309 8 50 26 8 50 26 MBELL PROPERTIES LLC 1542 EAST GREENBRIDGE DZARK, M065721-0000 4004 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4004 8 50 26 MCGRATH, PAUL M&KAREN M 3000VEROAD FORESTDALE, MA 02644--0000 4808 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4808 8 50 26 MCGUI NN,JOHNM&CAROL 15 ST NEGATE RD IAGRANGEPK,IL 60526---1044 80] FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 807 8 50 26 MC, KATRINA 37 JOHNSTON ST ST CATHERINES, ON CANADA L2N 5K8 4103 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4103 8 50 26 MCMAHON, ROBERTI&PAULINEA 2372 HIDDEN LAKE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34112-0000 804 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 804 8 50 26 MCNEILTR,ELIZABETHA MCWIUUAM,JAMES ELIZABETH A MCNEIL FL TRUST KATHRYN RYAN MCWILLIAM UTD 08/06/10 27 BAYVIEW DRIVE PD BOX 262 HUMAROCK, MA 02047 0262 ST CATHERINES, ON CANADA L2N4Y3 1107 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1107 4501 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4501 8 50 26 8 50 26 MESKELLFAMILYTRUST MORGAN, WAYNE M&ELIZABETHL 71 INMAN ROAD 2646 BAY ROAD WEYMOUTH, MA 02188DOW305 UORGINAL, ON CANADA KOB1K0 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 305 4202 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4202 8 :10 26 8 50 26 MORRIS, GAYNORA O'BRIEN, DENNISJ&JANE MAXI NE A MACGUIRE 2386MAGNOUAAVE#]813 572 CATTAIL COURT PICKERING, ON CANADA Ll- NAP LES,FL 34112-0000 4402 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4402 410 FALL INGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 410 8 50 26 8 50 26 O'BRIEN, MARK D&MARY LOUISE 2250 HIDDEN LAKE OR APT 3 NAP LES, FL 34112-2759 303 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 303 8 50 26 OTT, PETER 2420 HID DEN LAKE DR #5 NAPLES, FL 34112-2758 1005 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1005 8 50 26 OZ I PRO, RITAK 33TOLEWOODDRIVE PENFIELD,NY 14526-0000 4306 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4306 8 50 26 PAIAMIDIS,COSMOSC CATH ERINEAPAIAMIDIS 2355 HIDDEN LAKE DR #1 NAPLES, FL 34112-0000 4201 WA TER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4201 8 50 26 PARK,DOREEN PARKER, MARVIN T&MICHELLE D AW KI, KENNETH 3015CARLET CT 3850 SCENIC RIDGE#337 MARGUERITE PAWLOWSKI 16 FORESTER ST TOMS RIVER, NJ 08753---1318 TRAVERSE CITY, MI 49684-9777 LONG BEACH, NY 11561---2415 4302 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4302 fi09 FALLING WATERS I I A CONDOMINIUM 609 805 FALLINGWATERSHACONDOMINI UM 805 8 50 26 8 50 26 8 50 26 PAWLOWSKI, MARK PAYNE, BIAIR M&DENISE M KENNETH PAWLOWSKI 2395 HIDDEN LAKE DRIVE UNIT 4 120 REGENT OR LIDO BEACH, NY 11561-0000 NAP LES, FL 34112-0000 fiO3 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 603 460.4 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4604 8 50 26 8 50 26 PETRUS, RICHARD A PEYTON, MARY 4173 REGENTS PARK CATHERI NE HARKINS 2329 HIO DEN LAKE DR #3 HAMBURG, NV 140]5--1361 NAPLES, FL 34112-0000 1001 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1001 3903 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3903 8 50 26 8 50 26 PI ROLLO, MICHAEL P DENISE MARIE PIROLLO 116MCCURDY DR PITTSBURGH, PA 15235-1930 4503 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4503 8 50 26 PLUTA FAMILY TRUST %IOHN PLUTA 6722 BENJAMIN ST MCL EAN, VA 22101-0000 1106 FALLING WATERS IIACONDOMINIUM 1106 8 50 26 PONTBRIAND, RAYMONOP&JANICE 1355HIDDENIAKEDRAPT3 NAP LES,FL 34112-7589 4203 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4203 8 50 26 POGO, LEOCADIO RICHARD I FORMANI I CLAUDIA A RI CHARDS ON, BARBARA L 2773 SANDY LN FORMANI REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 2274 HIDDEN LAKES DRIVE #5 4111 ERHART ROAD NAPLES, FL 34112-2719 MEDINA, DH 44256-8975 NAPLES, FL 34102-0000 95026N1/20FSW1/40F NEI/40F5W1/4, LESS W30FT4.78AC 0F2007 PG 957 4]03 WATER CRESTACONDOMINIUM UNIT 4703 405 FALLING WATERS ACONOOMINIUM 405 9 50 26 8 50 26 8 50 26 RICHTER, J HANS RIFFLE, DARROL R&MARTHAA PO "1 19 5950 COPE LN EAST PETERSBURG, PA 17520--0159 NAP LES, FL 34112-2730 4710 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4730 OR 2027 PG 172] 85026E 171.77Fi OF W1/2 OF NE1/40F NE1/40FSE1/4 LESS N253FT+LESS ElOFT&LESS SLY 30FT 0./W 1.29 AC OR 1134 8 50 26 8 50 26 RILEY, SHIRIEYM 596: COPE LN NAPLES, FL 34112-2730 185026N 269Fi OFW 330FT OF WI/20F N11/4 OF NEL/40F SE 1/4 LESS S IIFT OF W 161.]FT OF E 171.7FT OF N264Fi OF W 8 50 26 RILEY, SHIR-M 5970 COPE LN NAPLES, FL 34112-2730 8 E LOFT EI/20F W1/20F NE3/40F NEI/40F SEL/4, LESS N 264FT, LESS SLY 30FT 011381 PG 1000 8 50 26 ROB ERT HILL 20141RREVTRUST SHIRLEY HILL 20141RREV TRUST PO BOX 1227 JAMESPORT, NY 11947-0000 4607 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUMUNIT4607 8 50 26 ROBE RT L TETNAULTREVTRUST KATHLEEN MTETRAULTREV TR 23W SUNSET BLVD NAP LES, FL 34112-8711 9502651/20F SE1/40F SWI/40F NW3/45 AC 9 50 26 RUNNION, WILLIAM R&CAROLA 2335 HI DDEN LAKE DR APT] NAPLES, FL 34112-8]45 400] WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4007 8 50 26 RUNSTEDLER, ROBIN P&CAROL A MARK P RUNSTEDLER 22 PLAYER PL STOUFFVILLE, ON CANADA L4A IMI ]0]FALLING WATERS IIACONDOMINIUM 70] 8 50 26 RYKIEL BONNIE SAUNDE1,CONNIE PAUL NOVA K 2274 HIDDEN LAKE DR APT6 51W W PALLING ROAD MONEE, IL 60449---0000 NAPLES, FL 34112-2757 404 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 404 40fi FALLING WA TERSIIAIINOOMINIIM406 8 50 26 8 50 26 SCALA, SABATINO&NANCY 80ROOKVALE LN TAKE GROVE, NY 11755-2709 808 FALLING WATERS IIACONDOMINIUM 808 8 50 26 SCHEEL, FRANKD ROGER&DORIS SCHIENKE, ALFRED MEISSNER STT 13 JANICE DEMOTS-SCHIENKE 2405 HIDDEN TAKE DR RI FALKENSEE GERMANY D-14612 NAPLES, FL 34112-0000 1304 FALLINGWATERS IACONDOMINI UM 1104 4709 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4]09 8 50 26 8 50 26 SCH UL"DARLEEN SCHWA MILE, KURT 143 RED OAKS DR 2250HIDDEN LAKE DRIVE #2 VAD AIS HGTS, MN 55127--0000 NAP LES, FL 34112-0000 4708 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4708 509 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 509 8 50 26 8 50 26 SCHWAMMLE, KURTW 2250 HI DONLAKE DR APT #2 NAPLES, FL 34112-0000 302 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 302 8 50 26 SEARFOIS, KENNETH R&JOICE 356 SYCAMORE LN PERRYSBURG,OH 43551---1638 4806 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 48060R 19]8 PG 178 8 50 26 SHEA, PHILIP)&KARENR 14 HE SPRINGFIELD, MA 01116---0000 ]01 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 701 8 50 26 SHIRLEYJNEYLON REVLIITRUST SHURTLEFF, IIAY&MAUREENA 20480 DORSET LN PO BOX 921 PROOKFIELD,WI 53045---1735 SOUTH WELLFLEET, MA 02663--0921 4408 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4408 802 FALLING WATERS IIACDNDOMINIUM 802 8 50 26 8 50 26 51MDNE, DON D&MARGARETF STANLEY, CARL ROGER&DEBRAL STEVENS, LINDA 43 WESTMINISTER ROAD 14915N8TH AVE 1301 BASSWOOD CIRCLE CHATHAM, NI 07928-0000 EFFINGHAM,IL 62401---6219 NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845--0000 4002WATERCRESTACONDOMINIUM UNIT 4002 4301 WATERCREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4101 4009 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4009 8 50 26 8 50 26 8 50 26 STOLOWSKI, RICHARD L&NANCYA N7DW15512 AMBERLEIGH CIR MENOMONE: FALLS, WI 53051-5090 4204 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UN IT 4204 8 50 26 SULLIVAN, ROBERT S&JOAN T 4GREENBRIAR LN PA%IP'A 19301-1908 905 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 905 8 50 26 SYDLWDTRUST 8950 FONTANA DEL SOLWAY# 100 NAP LES, FL 34109420 4306 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4106 8 50 26 TARULLI, MICHAEL&MAUREEN 22CRICKETCOURT WADINGRIVER, NY 11792-0000 SOI FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 501 8 50 26 THE IN, MADONNAR 2] 457 HIDDEN COVE RD COLD SPRING, IN 56320---10]0 4802 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4802 8 50 26 THERESA M RYAN REV TRUST UTO 12/19/07 7705 N SHORE DR SPICER,MN 56288-9678 1108 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 1108 8 50 26 THOMAS, DOROTHY E JOAN TSULLIVAN 6825 DAVIS BLVD#463 NAPLES, FL 34104-0000 4309 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4309 8 50 26 THOMPSON, MICHAEL&MARIE PO BOX FBI GOODIAND, FL 34140-0185 8502651/20F E1/2 OF NEl/4 OF NEI/40F SEI/4 LESS I30FT R/W, LESS THAT PORTION AS DESC IN OR 4337 PG 540 FOR R/W 8 50 26 9.B.e 00 to Q 3 V �m W }F E V m �F �F Q Packet P9. 990 -0170004414 9 • B • e 500' VA TOMLIN, BRIAN1 2750 SUNSET BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112-0000 9502651/20F SE1/40F NW1/40F SWI/4, LESS W 30FT 4.]] AC OR 1213 PG 1605 9 50 26 TREMONTE, ROBERT &JILL VALE, THOMAS 6LLOYD RD 3601 STATE ROUTE 159 NORWALK, CT 06850-1908 FREEBURG, IL 62243--2005 708 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 708 4605 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4605 8 50 8 50 26 26 VAN SOESJ, MARCO VANCE,LROSS&DEUUNEA IILLMITROSKY VAN SOEST 2329HIDOEN TAKE DR M6 6324SHADYGROVE CIRCLE NE NAPLES, FL 34112-0000 CANTON, OH 44]21--2506 3906 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3906 4]0] WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4]0] 8 50 8 50 26 26 VANCI N I FAM ILYTRUST 25 ELMWOOD STREET SOMERVIL., MA 02144---0000 4509 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4509 8 50 26 VITIE LLOTR,JOHN ROSEMARIE VITIELLO TR VITIELLO REALTY TRUST 301 N DIAN HI LL RD WESTON, MA 02493-2115 4404 WATER CREST A CONDOMI N IUM UNIT 4404 8 50 26 VOSS,JACKIEJ 2396HI EDEN LAKE DR APT] NAPLES, FL 34112-2765 907 FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 907 8 50 26 WADE, ROBERT J&MARYELLEN WILLIAMCMCCARTHVIRREVTRUST WILLISTON SHAWMUT TRUST 2]B PALMERST 5291 CHESTN UTRIDGERDAPTA 16 TINKERS LEDGE ROAD QDINCY,MA 02169---39W ORCHARD PARK, NV 1412]-3259 DU%BURV,MA 02332-0000 601 FALLING WATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 601 4504 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4504 4305 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4305 8 50 8 50 8 50 26 26 26 -ECKI, ROSE. ZIELKE,BERNARD&REGINAR 2324 HIDDEN LAKE DR APT] 40100 DEER TRAIL LN NAPLES, FL 34112-2766 WATERFORD,VA 2019]--1121 60] FALLINGWATERS II A CONDOMINIUM 607 4502-ERCREITACONDOMINIUM UNIT 4502 8 50 8 50 26 26 ZSOFKA TR, VJOS JANET ZSOFKA TR PETER&JOSEPH ZSOFKA TRUST JAN ET ZSOFKA REVOCABLE TRUST 31 PROFILE DR MERRIMACK, NH 03054-3042 4301 WATER CREST A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4301 8 50 26 Packet P9. 991 9.B.e Naptrs 4:3atIij Zrvjs Nap ;.Com Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na- N pies, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second y class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding 3 the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor W promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this q advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 0 Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# 0 Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES PA 1983989 Russell Square RPUD 0 N J a. Pub Dates N April 20, 2018 a. (Signature of affiant) Packet Pg. 992 CIL U m r c tv E U r r Q ffaZ c� (Sign ture of affiant) KAROLEKANGAS Notary Public - State of Florida Sworn to and subscribed before me Commission# GG 12W41 This April 20, 2018 : My Comm,EMplreesJul 29,2021 Ban lhmWh Natlaral Notary Assn, and f q �NYl9alo (Signature of affiant) Packet Pg. 992 10D 1 FRIDAY. APRIL 20. 2018 1 NAPLES DAILY NEWS Justin Hayward, left, and John Lodge of the Moody Blues perform during the Rock and ROTI Hall of Fame induction Saturday In Cleveland. DAVID RICHARD/AP Continued from previous page Soundgarden's "Black Hole Sun." Cor- nell hanged himself in a Detroit hotel for it!" hours after a Soundgarden concert The 33rd annual Rock Hall ceremony there last May. kicked off with a tribute to Tom Petty, The Cars and four first-time nomi- who died in October at age 66. The Kill- nees, including Simone, Dire Straits, ers earned a loud applause from the au- The Moody Blues and Sister Rosetta dience when they started performing Tharpe, make up the 2018 Rock & Roll "American Girl," then transitioning to Hall of Fame class. 'Tree Fallin:" Rock Hall voters have recently "Pay some rock 'n' roll respect ... to opened their hearts to progressive rock - the eternal Tom Petty," frontman Bran- ers, which benefited 'Nights in White don Flowers said, as photos of Petty Satin" singers The Moody Blues, the last were displayed in the background. act to be inducted Saturday. Later in the event, Ann Wilson of Another English band, Due Straits, Heart and Jerry Cantrell honored Chris Cornell with a commanding rendition of Continued on page 12D c pri� to.11 F DROP OFF r LOCATIONSr OPEN MON-FRI 9AM-5PM NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PUDZ-PL20170004414, Russell Square Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., representing Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC (Applicant) on: Thursday, May 10, 2018, 5:30 pm At the Shepherd of the Glades Lutheran Church, Fellowship Hall, 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd, Naples, FL 34113 A formal application has been submitted to Collier County, seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezone, by Neal Communities of Southwest Florida, LLC (Applicant). The proposed rezone is being requested to rezone the property from the A, Agricultural (ST -Overlay) Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District to permit a maximum of 230 multi -family dwelling units. Residential amenities will be provided on-site for the use of residents of the RPUD. Access to the site is from proposed Cope Lane. The subject property is comprised of approximately 32.9± acres, located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, approximately 1/. mile south of Davis Boulevard in Section 09, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. DAVIS BLVD Q 1� SUBJECT PROPERTY Y Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail to: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Phone: 239.947.1144 Fax: 239.947.0375 sumpenhour@gradyminor.com April 20, 2018 ND -1983989 LACES DE LOVE NEW Sf-iQES FOR NEEDY KIDS Mf10E VE SPONSORED BY BEST HOME SERVICES & NAPLES DAILY NEWS HAPPENING THROUGHOUT APRIL! Naples J Daily News 11001mmokalee Rd I Naples, FL 34110 • EST NOME SERVICES /yl Ow -d since 1980 16090STamaimiTr. I Ft. Myers,FL33908 1 Lpces of Love serves kids age 1 —18. Please bring a pair of NEW sneakers in any size. Shoes will distributed through public schools and/or organizations that serve needy children in Collier & Lee Counties. rDoing business with Best not only getsyou the best service - but also helps build the best community. We are pleased to offer... $1500 O F F A NEW A/C UNIT T, WITH ALL PROCEEDS' GOING TO L A I E S O f I I I E on CAU 239-208-0740 TODAY! Caupoc reuse be prexcud acd diswumed at �M1e poem of sales ireiwanim.Nl salecfical acd mmk.oRers caa dewretired. Pares, c�edns sficaccce.ayby �I. EXPs30�, e. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- !Z 7 Y V M Cal r C d E t V M ++ a The Laces of Love Ch&r hle Foundation, lnc is a501 -c3 notforprofit organization that provides new shoes m low-income and disadvantaged children and educates the puhrc a bout the needs of these children. Packet Pa- 993 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Russell Square RPUD - PL20170004414 May 10, 2018 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY "''Lease be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a pubiic records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. ►1_1LIF, i:i EMAIL: 9.B.e NAME: � EMAIL: r'v L yJ � [� ADDRESS: 0%6Z `G �j 5-6-y— FL -VP PHONE: ^ NAME:'- G ADDRESS: )� 9 1 NIM Sign -in Sheet 05/10/2018 5.01 EMAIL: PHONE: �(nU- �_ Ckh Oce c ter Packet Pg. 994 • - T� ADDRESS' - PHONE: f5 3 a co NAME: LL.� EMAIL: - Cl St j 3 ADtfl2&�i�FL�PHON(~�� v NAME: EMAIL: v o - ❑ ADDRESS: gf CfI�9rPtLI�/'W �LtJ�7 PHONE: 77�/U N J a N NAME: EMAIL: r Q.A. j�"jS� CQ {� D a ADDRESS; _ F PHONE. j c000 J tL Lc P 1 [� _ I� L! G Q NAME:►/L r 5490 EMAIL: 14mes' a0 Ce �IL_JZ e C��L ,�7' U ADDRESS: ozS�Sr�O C PHONE: p $ . 0 Im c m E NAME: EMAIL:�� R ADDRESS: PHONE: Q NAME: � EMAIL: r'v L yJ � [� ADDRESS: 0%6Z `G �j 5-6-y— FL -VP PHONE: ^ NAME:'- G ADDRESS: )� 9 1 NIM Sign -in Sheet 05/10/2018 5.01 EMAIL: PHONE: �(nU- �_ Ckh Oce c ter Packet Pg. 994 9.B.e NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Russell Square RPUD - PL20170004414 May 10, 2018 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***pLose be The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: (�� } (' ,�I� l r r�r I EMAIL:Q p,r L } ++ ADDRESS: 7 PHONE: a NAME: EMAIL:Urn ADDRESS: �� PHONE: 4� v 0 NAME: >r] S EMAIL: o 1� ti ADDRESS: ?[� PHONE: �[� �, S - �[i� N J 1 J a N C _ NAME: EMAIL: a ADDRESS: PHONE: coo v co CL NAME: xz�1 EMAIL: U ADDRESS: �7� � / PHONE: M m c NAME: EMAIL: R r r ADDRESS: PHONE: Q NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 05/10/2018 Packet Pg. 995 9.B.e Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 PL20170004414 Wayne Arnold: All right, good evening everybody. I think we're gonna try to go ahead and get started. It looks like there's no activity [inaudible 00:00:04]. Audience: We can't hear you. Wayne Arnold: Okay. Is that better, if I talk this loud? Okay. I'll try to make myself speak louder than I normally do. I'm Wayne Arnold, with Grady Minor Associates. Sharon Umpenhour from our office, who you might have received a letter from, is taping our meeting, which is required by Collier County. With us tonight, we have Michael Greenberg and Dan Ciesielski and Jason Frost, who are with Neal Communities. We have Jim Banks, who's our traffic engineer, and Rich Yovanovich who is our land use counsel working on the project. This is for a project called Russell Square PUD - I'm sorry, Mike Herrera from Grady Minor as well. He's our project engineer that's working on this. The project is called Russell Square, and it's currently a zoned agricultural piece of land just under 33 acres. We're asking to rezone the property to obtain a maximum of 230 multi -family units. The property is located on the east side of Santa Barbara Boulevard, immediately east of Falling Waters, just north of Cope Lane, and for the project we will be extending Cope Lane where the county's built improvements east to our project entrance. This is what our conceptual master plan looks like. The county has asked us to ... Want to make sure that we install sidewalks on the Cope Lane extension that we're building. They've also asked us to consider building it all the way to Sunset, so we will be discussing that with county staff to determine whether or not we actually construct that portion of Cope Lane up to Sunset Boulevard. The project, as I discussed, it's going to be accessed from that Cope Lane extension, and there will not be any access on Santa Barbara Boulevard. We have project ... Designated the road in that master plan C and then the R represents the residential tracts where the multi -family homes would go. We have an amenity area right back at the Cope Lane/Santa Barbara access, which is where our amenity features will be. After I tell you a little bit more about the zoning process that we're in, Michael Greenberg of Neal Communities will walk you through some of the slides we have representing the hardboards that have been set up and tell you a little bit more about Neal Communities and what they envision for the property. This depicts the aerial with the master plan inserted in it, so you get an idea of how we orient to the world. We're proposing 35 -foot -tall zoned height buildings, with a maximum height of 40 feet. Some of this is going to be subject to change. We just got our first round of comments back from Collier County, Page 1 of 18 CL U M m r c m U a r Q Packet Pg. 996 Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 9.B.e PL20170004414 we're gonna have to address some things, and things do change, so I encourage if you're here tonight, to stay plugged in to the process because things will change by the time we get to public hearings. We are asking for deviations from certain provisions of the land development code. We have a few sign deviations that we're asking for, because we don't have access on Santa Barbara Boulevard and our main entrances on Cope Lane. We've asked for some larger signage on the Santa Barbara frontage. We have asked to allow for a deviation on parking, for instance, for our recreational amenity. We think that the proximity of our own residents to our amenity area doesn't warrant as many parking spaces, for instance, that the county would normally require. We're asking for a small deviation for our internal road cross- section. We've got an area on our master plan that does not have homes on it. We're asking not to construct a sidewalk on both sides of the street there, but only on the side that would have homes. And I'm happy to share any [inaudible 00:03:45] cards, and you can email us or go onto our website and you can find all the information that we're sharing with you tonight, and all of our submittal information that goes back to Collier County. That's just in a nutshell what we're asking to do, and the process that we're in is going to require us to have public hearings before the Collier County Planning Commission. We'll be required to have a hearing before the Collier County Commission before the zoning is actually changed to allow for what we're proposing. We don't have hearing dates scheduled at this point, but we probably will make it to the Planning Commission some time this summer and then to the Board of County Commissioners we're hoping, I believe, hopefully we're there in October timeframe, but no guarantee. James Sabo is from Collier County government, he's the principal planner that's assisting on this case, and James is sitting over here. He's taken the case and is going to be handling it internally, and I know that James, if you need to get in touch with him, he's happy to field any of your phone calls or emails as well, if you have questions about the process. But from here forward we'll be interacting with Collier County staff and going through a set of revisions to our submittal documents. They've given us, as I've said, one set of comments back. Nothing too significant, but we have to address those. Michael, if I could turn it over to you, I'll let you talk a little bit more about Neal Communities. M Greenberg: Good evening. Can you hear me okay? Audience: Yeah. M Greenberg: Is that loud enough, 'cause I'd rather do without the mic. My name is Michael Greenberg. I'm the Regional President for Neal Communities for Lee and Collier County. Some of you know, are familiar with us, Page 2 of 18 CL U M m r c m E U R r Q Packet Pg. 997 9.B.e Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 PL20170004414 'cause you may have seen us speak in previous properties locally, but I'll give you a little background of Neal Communities. We are a family-owned, private company located, headquartered in Lakewood Ranch, Sarasota area. We have been in Lee and Collier County now, it will be six years this coming August, and our offices are here in Bonita Springs. We've been in business for 48 years. We are the 43rd -largest builder in the United States. We've been building only exclusively in Florida, and we build from Tampa to Naples, and the section of Lee and Collier County we've been doing for the past six years. During that time, we've built over 80 communities in our territory from Tampa down to Naples, and many of them were [inaudible 00:06:08] master planned communities with single family and multi -family product, golf - course communities, non -golf communities. We have been in Collier County now for the last six years. We've built several single family communities, one Reflection Lakes down in South 41, Canopy in north Naples. We currently are building a community called Avalon, that you may be familiar with, around the corner on Davis and County Barn Road, and we are now under construction for what's going to be called Marquesa Isles, also on County Barn Road where you see the construction, just south of Davis. We are very proud of our heritage. We've built a lot of communities. Obviously, being a family-owned business, our reputation and our relationship with the communities that we've built in is extremely important with us. We haven't been through all the ups and downs of the economy over the past 48 years, and a not only survived, but grown to be a successful company, without having a N C relationship with our community at large. So we try to give back, and it's more D a than just writing checks. We do a lot of volunteerism with our staff, in local charities and community service organizations. What's recently over on our 00 v County Barn Road, Dan Ciesielski, our Land Development Manager, has great relationships with Collier County Fire Department and first responders, and we 3 provided our facilities there, as we had done previously five years ago, in north U Naples, to allow first responders, both fire, police, SWAT, et cetera to do various m practice runs, which they don't get the opportunity to do because there aren't many facilities. So we try to partner with them in order to give them those real- E life experiences. R r r Q This project is something that we're very excited about, as Wayne described to you the location and the property, what we envision here is, as in our Avalon community, that is a British -West Indies condominium for sale product that's an eight-plex building. You'll be able to see, when you look at the pictures on the side, that provide four units on the first floor, four units on the second floor, some with one -car garage, some with two -car garage, and they range from two bedroom to three bedroom community homes for people. We've had tremendous success there. We're almost about 65 percent sold out in just a little over a year, and we've gotten great reception from the people that have bought there and live there, and feel that what we're proposing and what we look to this property to do will complement that. We're looking at a little bit different sized amenity because the amenity here is going to service more Page 3 of 18 Packet Pg. 998 Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 9.B.e PL20170004414 homes, so we're designing right now a little bit larger, multi-purpose type amenity for the property. If you're happy to look at the boards, you'll get a little picture of ... There's some photographs also of the residence, in case you haven't been over to Avalon to get a sense of it. Another thing I forgot to mention about our company. I don't mean to brag too much. We've won a number of really great awards over the years. Awards that you don't apply for, you don't buy, you actually get selected without knowing, and one of them was that we were nominated and selected as the Builder of the Year for the entire United States in 2015. By our industry, which was a surprise for us, not because we weren't deserving, but not knowing it was going to happen. I think that is a recognition of our industry recognizing that we set a very high standard that the industry should be very proud of, and hopefully that's also true by our customers, who have repeated to buy with us in multiple communities over the years. So I'm happy to answer any questions on our part of it, and Wayne and I can be of help together to you tonight. I'm happy to also give you my business card if you need it as well to inquire. Thank you. Wayne Arnold: Thank you, Michael. One of the things that we have questions and answers, and I'm sure you have some more questions, and we can provide, hopefully, the answers to your questions, but the county's Planning Commission has specifically asked us to make sure that people indicate their name, because when these get transcribed, they don't want to hear "unknown gentleman" or something. They kinda want to know who that is. They want to know if it's somebody from our development team or if it's a member of the audience, and if we could do that and make sure we speak up so we can get it on tape, or if you feel more comfortable, we can pass the microphone to you and you can ask your question that way, or I'll try to repeat the question if necessary. So that wil open it up for any questions that you may have. Wow, Michael, you did a great job. Yes ma'am? Pam Ashanti: Pam [Ashanti 00:10:42] from Falling Waters. When you were talking about extending Cope Lane? Cope Lane currently doesn't go through to Santa Barbara, so you were talking about extending it to Santa Barbara and onto the other side? Is that what you're speaking of? Wayne Arnold: Yes ma'am. Cope Lane on the west side of Santa Barbara Boulevard does not connect all the way through to Santa Barbara. When the county did the Santa Barbara extension improvements, they provided a right turn and a left turn lane at Cope Lane on our side, and they've asked us to provide our access point off of that. So we're calling it a Cope Lane extension, on paper it is known as Cope Lane, but it's unapproved and it's not presently in a form that the county would accept as access, so we have to make improvements to that. Page 4 of 18 CL U M m r c m E t U R r Q Packet Pg. 999 9.B.e Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 PL20170004414 Speaker 5: But you're just gonna do the east side? You're not gonna do anything on the west side? Wayne Arnold: This is Wayne Arnold again. The question was no improvements on the west side of Santa Barbara, only on the east side? And that is correct. Our improvements only extend east of Santa Barbara Boulevard. Yes, sir? Donnie Davis: So back to Cope Lane, where does that leave that? I mean, we're a private road, there's 11 of us. Wayne Arnold: I'm sorry, what was the question? Donnie Davis: I'm Donnie Davis, I live on Cope Lane, on the west side, so what's that got to do with Cope Lane over there where we're at? Wayne Arnold: We don't have anything to do with Cope Lane west of Santa Barbara Boulevard Donnie Davis: Is it proposed? Are you proposing? Wayne Arnold: No, sir. I don't think the county even has any plans to make improvements to Cope Lane - Donnie Davis: Where are you getting the name Cope Lane? Wayne Arnold: The Cope Lane is an actually recorded public easement east of Santa Barbara Boulevard. It's a 60 -foot -wide public right-of-way that extends for a very short way. Speaker 7: Hey guys? Donnie? All of us on Cope Lane, what they're talking about is on the other side of Santa Barbara, it's along that pond over there, the retention pond. It's on the other side of the road. They're calling that Cope Lane on the edge of it. Donnie Davis: I understand. But is that gonna be some confusion for people when they all put in Cope Lane extension, that they don't come down our private road and be lost? Wayne Arnold: The question is is that gonna be confusion for people to be able to find it since Cope Lane exists. I don't think so, I think most of the marketing materials - M Greenberg: In our case ... Michael Greenberg. In our case, the marketing materials will bring people down Santa Barbara, making a left or a right on Cope Lane, so I highly doubt there will be confusion. Donnie Davis: Why would they call it Russell Square Boulevard or Lane? Instead of Cope? Page 5 of 18 Packet Pg. 1000 9.B.e Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 PL20170004414 Wayne Arnold: I guess the county might be receptive to changing the name, but it's technically, and it is platted as Cope Lane. Skip Riffle: I guess we're all concerned, too ... Skip Riffle, 5950 Cope Lane. Not only is it a private road, each of us own up the middle of it, but it's also posted at 25 miles an hour, and we have tons of people already coming down the road thinking that they can cut off the light on Davis Boulevard. So when they hear the name Cope Lane extension or whatever, they've known for years that Cope Lane is off of County Barn, they're going to come down that way, and our road is not a coded road. When Falling Waters put it in, they put a two-inch cap over a graded [inaudible 00:14:28] and that was it. It cannot take the traffic. Wayne Arnold: No, we understand that. Skip Riffle: Right. Wayne Arnold: I think we can do all we can to make sure that people use Santa Barbara to get to this parcel. Yes, ma'am. Lynea Chase: [Lynes 00:14:41] Chase, 2497 Sandy Lane, agricultural zoned with farm animals. How close do you plan on building to our property? The condominiums or the houses, whatever - Wayne Arnold: Is your property shown on the aerial photograph that I have here? Speaker 10: Last house on the left on Sandy Lane, right there. Through the back west, east side of your property. CL Speaker 11: It's backed up to 2402 Sunset. m r Wayne Arnold: Is this the area? E Lynea Chase: Right around there, yeah. r r Q Wayne Arnold: Okay. Michael, maybe you can help me with some details [crosstalk 00:15:20]. M Greenberg: Michael Greenberg. The street layout that you see here represents the residence will be built on either side of this street internally. There will be no houses facing onto the back of the property, so they'll be internal towards the lake here. And same thing here. So it'd only be the side of the building here, the side of the building here along that side of the property, and nothing with that [inaudible 00:15:56]. That was the section where you see that vertical section of the road here, this is where Wayne was talking about the single sidewalk only, because there won't be any residence on the other side. I hope that answers your question. Page 6 of 18 Packet Pg. 1001 9.B.e Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 PL20170004414 Lynea Chase: I think so. Wayne Arnold: Other questions? I saw a hand up over here. Yes, sir? Dolph Mayer: [Dolph Mayer 00:16:13], Cope Lane as well. I think the major concern for just about everybody that's here is the water. A lot of this is low-lying areas, and we're watching all this stuff get built around us that are just getting higher and higher and higher. Have you guys put in for water retention on these communities that you guys are doing? Wayne Arnold: Yes, sir, we do. We have to go through full permitting with the South Florida Water Management District, and we have a lake system on site that we'll be discharging into before it discharges off-site. The whole canal system that was improved along Santa Barbara was part of the Lely Area Improvement Program, as I'm sure most of you all were aware of, 'cause it carries over on County Barn Road as well, but it ultimately discharges into that system, and it's got a controlled discharge rate and things like that. Dolph Mayer: Yeah, it floods us. Wayne Arnold: Michael Herrera, from our office, who's our Professional Engineer that's working on the permitting can certainly answer other detailed questions, but generally speaking, we have to discharge at the rate that the Water Management District tells us, and Collier County tells us to. Yes, sir, in the back row? Al Pinehurst: Al Pinehurst, 7775 Naples Heritage Road. We're in the houses that are on the other side of the lake. How far are you going to go over to the lake? Now we have, right now we have a view of our woods. Are we still going to have that view? Wayne Arnold: You live south of Cope Lane, sir? Speaker 14: We don't know where Cope Lane is. M Greenberg: Excuse me. Michael Greenberg speaking. You're living over here? Al Pinehurst: That's correct. M Greenberg: Our property stops here. It's a little hard to see. There's a dashed line here? Al Pinehurst: Yes. Page 7 of 18 CL U M m r c m E t U R r r Q Packet Pg. 1002 9.B.e Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 PL20170004414 M Greenberg: That's the edge of our property. So everything east of us and northeast of us is not our property. Al Pinehurst: Okay. Speaker 14: But what is [inaudible 00:18:021 where the yellow square is, what is to the right of that? I can't read it. Wayne Arnold: The question is what's to the east of our property line? And to the east of our property line is single family home and some agriculture. Al Pinehurst: That's already there. Speaker 14: Is that on Sandy Lane? Speaker 15: Yes, and that's existing. Al Pinehurst: Thank you. Wayne Arnold: Yes, sir. Other questions? Don't be shy. Speaker 16: So you're gonna drain your water where? Wayne Arnold: Michael - Speaker 16: Under to the west side and down their canals? Wayne Arnold: The county ... You're familiar with the county - Speaker 16: We're familiar. Wayne Arnold: The county has a series of lakes, and one of 'em happens to be just south of Cope Lane right there, and there's a ditch that exists along that. It's my understanding that the county's going to require us to discharge into that ditch system after the water flows through our own internal lakes, and then it finds its way underneath Santa Barbara Boulevard into the canal. Skip Riffle: Well that brings up a problem. Again, Skip Riffle. The eastern end of Cope Lane has been just absolutely inundated with water. It's been an ongoing problem with the county. It was totally done or engineered wrong, and every time the water comes up along County Barn, it backs up through there, it's pitched the wrong way. Pitching all the water down toward the east end of Cope Lane, and we get flooded out. I got standing three feet of water at the front of where the edge of my property is. The guys across the street, it comes all the way up to halfway to their house. Adding more discharge to the west of Santa Barbara is going to create a big problem. Page 8 of 18 Packet Pg. 1003 9.B.e Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 PL20170004414 Wayne Arnold: Thank you. Any other comments? Skip Riffle: And I believe this gentleman right here, in the white shirt, you're with the county, are you sir? Are you with the county? Rich Yovanovich: I'm a lawyer for the project. He's with the county. [crosstalk 00:20:15]. Speaker 19: You Coleman? Rich Yovanovich: What's that? Speaker 19: You Coleman? Rich Yovanovich: No, I'm Yovanovich. What's the question, ma'am, I'm sorry? Pam Ashanti: Is there somebody here from the county? Wayne Arnold: James Sabo, who's the principal planner with the county, he is here, and he's taking notes. James Sabo: I am taking notes, and what I can do is ... I'm not a water engineer, and I don't pretend to know what all the drainage issues are. But what I can do is take the question back. The issue for these folks tonight is your questions about the other side of Santa Barbara, I'll be happy to answer. I don't think they're directly related to this project in terms of their discharge. Skip Riffle: The water comes underneath Santa Barbara to the west side. It does impact us. You watch it bubble right up through the drains and then back toward my yard. coo Shirley Riley: I'm Shirley Riley, I know exactly what Skip is talking about. I've taken pictures. CL Y I've waded out there. Water goes all the way up to the road. These dikes that they have, they're holding that water back, that holds it back and floods all of us 00 r out. If this project is gonna shoot their water over towards us, it's just gonna get worse because they won't open those dikes up. The water goes around them, E the dikes. They need to open them up and let the water out instead of flooding everybody on this side of it. And when this project goes in, it's gonna get worse. r Q Wayne Arnold: Well, the Water Management District ... This is Wayne Arnold, by the way. The Water Management District looks at, comprehensively, all the permits in the basin. Collier County does as well, and every one of them has to discharge to certain locations, so whatever goes here has to discharge only in certain locations. Water is wanting to go southwest in this location, so that's how it's designed to discharge. Mike Herrera? Michael Herrera Wayne Arnold Michael Herrera. Speak up. Page 9 of 18 Packet Pg. 1004 Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 9.B.e PL20170004414 Michael Herrera: Yep. So the current conditions of the site, which are unregulated flow, meaning when it rains it just falls off-site. Portions of the property currently already drain across an unregulated rate, so however fast it's raining, a portion of the property goes that way. In post condition, after this project is developed, we're no longer allowed to discharge at an uncontrolled rate. The county requires us to discharge at a controlled rate, so I don't know how much of the existing conditions flow there, but it's a possibility that underneath the proposed conditions, you'll be experiencing less flow than you are currently today. Donnie Davis: Are you required to have retaining ponds on your development? Michael Herrera: Absolutely, yeah. We gotta retain certain storm events and provide on-site water quality before we're allowed to discharge. Donnie Davis: How many you have? Michael Herrera: What's that? Lakes? Donnie Davis: How many you have projected? Michael Herrera: We've got three lakes. One along Santa Barbara, one in the middle of the residential area, and one in the northeast corner. Skip Riffle: Question. When they built Santa Barbara, did they put in storm drains from the swales on Santa Barbara? Michael Herrera: That's a county design. Skip Riffle: All right, Mr. County? James Sabo: I don't know. I can find out. I'm not a water engineer. I won't pretend to know the answer. I can find out for you. Skip Riffle: I mean, that could discharge into that system from your side of the road to flow south. Michael Herrera: This is Michael Herrera. We don't determine the location of the discharge location. The county directs us where the best location for this property to discharge as historically has been. Skip Riffle: And what is it? You with the county, what are you over? The planner. James Sabo: Land use and zoning. Skip Riffle: From the residents stand there, the county went and designed the current flow system down the pro -plane from Santa Barbara to County Barn. Please forgive us if we don't really say that they have too much going for them in the way that Page 10 of 18 Packet Pg. 1005 Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 9.B.e PL20170004414 they designed it. We don't have any faith in that design. All we know, it rains, we get flooded, and they keep saying, "Oh, we're fixing it. We did this, we'll do that." Everything they do either makes it worse or has no effect at all, so we don't have too much faith in the county's drainage program. Wayne Arnold: Understood. James is gonna, I'm sure, take those comments back to the county engineer and the drainage folks. Yes, ma'am? Lynea Chase: Lynea Chase, Sandy Lane. Is there a price point for these units, and do they have to be a certain percentage of owner -occupied or is there affordable housing involved in this? M Greenberg: No, they're 100 ... Right now, we haven't proposed any affordable housing. We're proposing them for sale at the market rate, so if the county makes that determination, that's [inaudible 00:25:40] future, not with us. Right now it's not our proposal. Skip Riffle: Is it gonna be two-story, like - Skip Riffle: The Avalon are four-story. M Greenberg: Yes, just like Avalon. In fact, that's why I purposely brought the pictures tonight, in case you hadn't been to Avalon, to provide you insight into the visual look. That's what we intend to have in - Speaker 20: Is it gonna be like the one you're building right in front of my house, right now? Across the lake off of County Barn? M Greenberg: At Avalon? Speaker 20: No, past Avalon. The new one. M Greenberg: Past Avalon is a totally different type of community, different kind of housing project. That's Marquesa Isle, like I mentioned earlier. Those are single family, attached two-story ... Excuse me, two units, in attached villas, one-story housing. Lynea Chase: What's the price range? Wayne Arnold: Michael - This is Wayne Arnold. One of the questions they asked, do we have any idea what price points might be for this PUD? Page 11 of 18 Packet Pg. 1006 9.B.e Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 PL20170004414 M Greenberg: Price points will probably be similar to where we are now. We're in the high 200,000 range to start. That's our expectation. Speaker 20: How about that Marquesas? What's the price range in there? M Greenberg: Haven't determined yet, but they'll be higher because they're single family versus multi -family. Wayne Arnold: Other questions? Any topics we haven't touched on that you're interested in? Yes, ma'am? Pauline Thomas: Can we just talk about Cope Lane for a second again, over east of Santa Barbara? My name is Pauline Thomas, 5785 Cope Lane, and my question is for Mr. County. James? James Sabo: James. I like Mr. County better. Pauline Thomas: My question is, is in what forum, we certainly all have a concern about that side still being called Cope Lane because of the entrance and the ... For many reasons. What is the forum or do we do up letters to send in to the county to try to get that changed to a different name, or is it during a hearing, or how do we go about this? James Sabo: Expressed here is one, at the public hearing would be a second opportunity. There are petitions, I'm not precisely familiar with naming for streets, but some streets were named by developers in the past that are kind of confusing, and they have been renamed. So renaming a street is a possibility. I don't know the exact procedure, but bringing it up here, bringing it up at the public hearing, and then - Pauline Thomas: Is there something that we can do correspondence -wise, documentation -wise and submit it to the county also and be a what type of, in what forum? James Sabo: Yes, you can email me, I left my cards on the table there. You can email me those ... We compile all that information and provide to the Planning Commissioners for the public hearing. You can email it to me, I'll compile it, and they'll have all that information. You can also, if you ... You can contact them directly - Pauline Thomas: Them? James Sabo: The Planning Commissioners, you can contact them directly as well. Pauline Thomas: Okay. 'Cause we certainly have a concern about that. Wayne Arnold: Thank you. Page 12 of 18 Packet Pg. 1007 9.B.e Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 PL20170004414 Yes, sir? Speaker 21: How much of the 30 plus acres would you left as preserve? Wayne Arnold: On this plan, we have ... This is Wayne Arnold again. Let me find my plan that's got the breakdown on it. I don't know that off the top of my head, though I do have that number for you, sir. Just give me one moment. This is Wayne Arnold again. The preserve area that we're required to have on site is ... It's a little dark in here. We're showing a preserve area of 3.61 acres of the property. The preserve areas are shown on that plan, and it will be located as a small wetland area along Santa Barbara Boulevard. There's another preserve area to the north of... that abuts, a project called Taormina Reserve, Preserve Area. Those are the two best areas on site to retain for native vegetation. The county has native preservation requirements. The bulk of this site was cleared. You drive by and you see there's pasture, and there's some goats and things out there. It's been cleared for agricultural purposes, and the parcel that's located right here has not been cleared, and then there are two single family homes that occupy the balance of the site. Skip Riffle: Is this gonna be a gated community? Wayne Arnold: It's anticipated to be gated, yes sir. Yes, ma'am. Heather: Heather [inaudible 00:30:36]. You mentioned Taormina. What does that have to do with the preserve land that you're mentioning? Wayne Arnold: Taormina Preserve is a project located north of our proposed Russell Square. Y Rich Yovanovich [inaudible 00:30:55] several years ago. It's designed to be a U mixed-use project. It has, as part of its project area, it has a commercial 00 component, it has a residential, but it also has preservation areas for native m vegetation. Part of their native vegetation happens to be where I'm highlighting, E just to the northeast of our site, and that's where one of our preserves will abut R their preserve. But it has nothing to do specifically with our project. Q Speaker 22: Your new preserve will attach to the old Taormina Preserve? Wayne Arnold: Yes, sir. Speaker 22: Or it will be part of it? Wayne Arnold: The vegetation will be adjacent to each other. It's one of the criteria the county utilizes where we can have preserves that are connected to each other. That's what they encourage us to do. Page 13 of 18 Packet Pg. 1008 Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 9.B.e PL20170004414 Pauline Thomas: And how large will that be? How large will that be? The part where Taormina is. Wayne Arnold: I'm not certain of the breakdown between the two, but it's probably approximately two acres, I'm guessing. Pauline Thomas: How much? Wayne Arnold: Approximately two acres. Speaker 23: But you only have 3.61 altogether? Wayne Arnold: Correct. Yes. m L Yes, sir. a Rich Chase: [Rich Chase 00:32:00] on Sandy Lane. Is it possible to get a map of your proposed master plan overlaid on an existing map so we can see where all the y streets are? Property lines and things? adjacent to all of this green space that was part of Taormina's preserve. Q Yes, sir? John Bruce: I'm John Bruce. You're not really clearing anything. Wayne Arnold: We are clearing some vegetation. Parts of the site have native vegetation, but about 18 to 20 acres of the site has been previously cleared for farming operations. Speaker 24: And then the wetlands stays? Page 14 of 18 Packet Pg. 1009 Wayne Arnold: Something like that? An aerial photo? c 0 0 Rich Chase: Yeah. 1- T - CD 0 N J Wayne Arnold: I think that one has my master plan. If you'll be happy to leave us an email N number where I can send you a PDF if you receive things electronically, or an address where we can physically mail it to, we'll be happy to. a Rich Chase: Okay. 00 W Wayne Arnold: Yes, sir? CL Y U cc Speaker 24: Could you show us where the preserves are in that larger map? m r c m Wayne Arnold:The preserves are located here, it's a small vegetated area right along Santa Barbara Boulevard. There's another preserve proposed right there, that's r adjacent to all of this green space that was part of Taormina's preserve. Q Yes, sir? John Bruce: I'm John Bruce. You're not really clearing anything. Wayne Arnold: We are clearing some vegetation. Parts of the site have native vegetation, but about 18 to 20 acres of the site has been previously cleared for farming operations. Speaker 24: And then the wetlands stays? Page 14 of 18 Packet Pg. 1009 9.B.e Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 PL20170004414 Wayne Arnold: That's correct. The wetland there will stay, along Santa Barbara Boulevard, that they're proposing, and this small area up here adjacent to Taormina that will remain this preserve. The county requires us to preserve at least 25 per cent of the native vegetation that's on site, so it's not based on the total acreage, it's based on how much native vegetation [crosstalk 00:33:34] on site today. John Bruce: May I follow up? Wayne Arnold: Yes, sir. John Bruce: John Bruce. On that map, the only place that's really getting cleared is the southernmost portion. 'Cause that's the lot that's just treed now. Wayne Arnold: That's correct. It's the area that I'm highlighting, it's in the very southeastern m portion of our project. The other two parcels north have single family homes a and have been cleared for some single family use with some stabling and things — of that nature, so yes, the only area that's gonna be completely cleared will be m y one parcel to the southeast of the site. Kurtz. K -U -R -T -Z. Wayne Arnold: Could be Jared Kurtz, who works with Collier County government. He is involved Anything else, anybody? with the LASIP drainage project. 0 0 0 Donnie Davis: Mr. [Kurtz 00:34:14], is he still with the county? 0 N J James Sabo: Yeah, he is. a N D Donnie Davis: Where's he at? a 0 Speaker 26: James? With the county? CL Donnie Davis: Yeah. U Speaker 26: That's him right there. 00 r c m James Sabo: You seem as though you're looking right at me, but James Sabo is my name. E R r Donnie Davis: All right, who's Kurtz? Q James Sabo: I don't know who ... Wayne Arnold: What name are you saying, sir? James Sabo: Kurtz? Donnie Davis: Kurtz. K -U -R -T -Z. Wayne Arnold: Could be Jared Kurtz, who works with Collier County government. He is involved with the LASIP drainage project. Page 15 of 18 Packet Pg. 1010 Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 Donnie Davis: Yes. Is he involved in this? Wayne Arnold: No. Not at the moment. Other questions, comments? Ready to wrap it up? Yes, ma'am? Speaker 27: When do you plan on doing this, if it's ... 9.B.e PL20170004414 Wayne Arnold: Well, we hope to make it through the zoning process successfully some time this fall, and then Neal Communities will be concurrently going through the permitting process with the Water Management District and the county, and hopefully coming out of the ground some time in 2019. Speaker 28: You know when the next meeting is? Wayne Arnold: The next meeting that we will have will be with the Collier County Planning Commission. We do not have hearing dates established at this time, but zoning signs will go up on the property prior to that meeting. There'll be a legal ad in the newspaper, and everyone within the 500 feet notice requirements will get a letter stating that it's going to a hearing. James Sabo: And the letter's from us, from the county. The letter tonight was from the developer. Wayne Arnold: Mr. Riffle? Skip Riffle: Your lakes there. Do you plan on popping a hole in the cap rock so that it maintains its level and is able to move the water level up and down? Wayne Arnold: You'll have to defer to one of our engineers in the audience. I don't know the answer to that. Skip Riffle: All right, let me just continue on with that thought. When they put Santa Barbara in, we had ... Quite [crosstalk 00:36:18] they were doing some blasting. And we had quite a bit of damage, cracks in our walls and so forth when they blasted. In fact, we even, over where they're building on County Barn right now, every day around quarter 'til three, they blast, and it jiggles everything in the house. So I was just wondering if ... To just have a groundwater runoff lake, that's what we have at the end of Cope Lane that goes dry this time of year, it's almost dry up there now. And all the fish and everything die and the place stinks like crazy. But that's because they never knocked a hole in the cap rock to go to the aquifer, so ... Wayne Arnold: I don't know the answer to this. Page 16 of 18 CL U M m r c m E U R r r Q Packet Pg. 1011 Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 Speaker 29: Well they're blowing over there now. 9.B.e PL20170004414 Michael Herrera: Yeah, at this point, we haven't even received the [inaudible 00:37:09] for the site, so we don't know the locations of anything, but at a minimum we'll be going 12 feet in depth for the lake, as required by Collier County. Wayne Arnold: Another question in the back? Speaker 30: Will they mail a companion to this presentation to the people who signed in? Wayne Arnold: If anybody desires to have a copy of this, and you left your name and address, let us know, and I'll be happy to get it to you. Speaker 29: So if our name and address is up there, you'll mail it to us? Wayne Arnold: If you want one. I don't want to send it to people unnecessarily. Some people would prefer to see something electronically. Speaker 29: How do we determine, how do we mark - Wayne Arnold: You'll mark on there. Sharon: It'll be easier if they take my card and just email me. Wayne Arnold: Okay, that's a good idea. Sharon, if you'll take her card and email her, or call her and let her know that you want the presentation, you have [inaudible 00:38:02] Anybody else? Speaker 30: Just another question. Do you have any intentions about Cope Reserve? Or are you aware of it? M Greenberg: Cope Reserve being where? Speaker 30: It's on County Barn Road. M Greenberg: I know where Cope Lane is. Are we doing anything on Cope Lane other than - Speaker 30: No, on Cope Lane, right past Cope Lane [crosstalk 00:38:29]. We're not sure you're aware of. M Greenberg: We're not doing anything west of Santa Barbara. Speaker 30: I'm talking about you doing your project down at the lake, you got Cope Lane, and then you got Cope Reserve that's proposed to be built. M Greenberg: Ah, the other property going in. Page 17 of 18 m L a m N 7 v 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a N D a 00 W v co CL U M m r c m E U R r r Q Packet Pg. 1012 9.B.e Russell Square NIM 05-10-2018 PL20170004414 Speaker 30: Yeah. M Greenberg: That's not us. We have no interest in that property. Speaker 30: Okay. Wayne Arnold: Anybody else? Going once, twice? Shirley Riley: You know what's so confusing? Back in the 60s, when I bought that property, my brother said, "I'll go in there and put a road through for ya." He took his bulldozer, went down through the woods, and cleared that out so I could start building a house. Well, that's why Cope Lane's not straight, 'cause he just got on the bulldozer and went. He stopped at my driveway. He had no reason to go on. That's why none of us have ever heard of Cope Lane continuing on because there was no road there. It went as far as my driveway and stopped. So that's why we're all lost at this. Wayne Arnold: We've prepared boundary surveys, and the county records indicate that there's a 60 foot public right-of-way called Cope Lane that extends east of Santa Barbara Boulevard. Shirley Riley: That was actually like a dune buggy sand trail. Wayne Arnold: Yeah, it must be for Mr. Greenberg and Neal Communities, but I don't think they can care less [crosstalk 00:40:04]. Folks, can we just [crosstalk 00:40:18]. One at a time, please. We're trying to record the meeting, it sounds very bad when the Planning Commissioners listen to the audio tape, it's inaudible and it's frustrating for them and they don't like it. James and I didn't manage the meeting properly. So if we could do one at a time, we have another comment for the public, or if we're ready to adjourn, I'm happy to do that too, and you all can visit amongst yourselves or look at some of the boards that are displayed around the room. Yes, sir. Donnie Davis: I will make a comment. Donnie Davis. We are about tired of all of our land being taken to build the damn communities all the way around the place. It is getting old. Now we'll have condos all over. We're losing all of our land. They're taking it, the county. Wayne Arnold: Thank you. Anything else? No? If not, then I'm gonna go ahead and close the meeting. I appreciate everybody coming out and taking the time to visit and like I said, grab one of Sharon's cards, let us know if you want any of the information we shared with you tonight. We'll be happy to get it. Thank you. Page 18 of 18 CL U M m r c m E U R r r Q Packet Pg. 1013 9.B.e Russell Square RPUD May 10, 2018 Neighborhood Information Meeting GradyMi �r Packet Pg. 1014 9.B.e Project Team • Michael R. Greenberg, Southwest Florida Regional President — Neal Communities • Dan Ciesielski, Land Development Manager — Neal Communities • Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney — Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner — Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • Michael Herrera, P.E., Engineer — Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • James Banks, P.E., Traffic Engineer — JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. • Tim Hall, Environmental Consultant — Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. L CO V! 0 0 0 0 N J a. N a. 00 to V 3 M COE a WGrady or Packet Pg. 1015 9.B.e Project Information ` Existing Zoning: A, Agricultural Proposed Zoning: Russell Square Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Project Acreage: 32.9+/- acres Proposed PUD Rezone Request: A maximum of 230 multi- amily dwelling units Project Density: 7 Dwelling Units Per Acre MGrady or Packet Pg. 1016 Location Map 9.B.e mGrady or Packet Pg. 1017 Conceptual Master Plan TAORMINA RESERVE MPUD 4 COMMERCIAL —,5,w TYPE'R' LANDSCAPE BUFFER SCALE!7'=200' z l TAORMINA RESERVE MPUD OI NR PRESERVE I�I °� I PUD BOUNDARY ?A•I + NO BUFFER REQUIRED WIDE } - . .. .... ....... ...... i OI O TYPED' I ..., ....... . LANDSCAPE I } R - - - _ - ..'.'.'. ..... } Feil 3 BUFFER II I PRE5ERVE� NATER I p I NAGEMEN i m m Ill �m 3 I R 15' WIDE -PF "I ❑ LANDSCAPE BUFFER ❑ PRESERVE [ 5 N N oz mm za F21 R I 2 I �3 p 55' WIDE nFE'B' I 1 Ij LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' WIDE TYPEDLANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONED A RESIDFNTLAL ZONED A COUNTY WATER MANAGEMENT AREA ®= DEVIATION 1 A =AMENITY AREA I 1 R =RESIDENTIAL AREA 9.B.e L mGrady or Packet Pg. 1018 Aerial Master Plan Ove rlay N C14 —j a. N a. 00 to cD L) R co C (D E V fC mGrady or I Packet Pg. 10191 TAORMINA RESERVE MPUD TAOR C14 —j a. N a. 00 to cD L) R co C (D E V fC mGrady or I Packet Pg. 10191 9.B.e Requested Deviations ■ Deviation 1: Temporary banner sign up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area and 8 feet in height. The temporary banner sign shall be limited to a maximum of 90 days during season defined as November 1 to April 30 per calendar year. This Deviation will remain valid until 90% of the units are sold. At such time, the Deviation will be void. ■ Deviation 2: On -premises directional signs to be setback 5' from edge of roadway paved surface or back of curb ■ Deviation 3: 8 -foot high wall on top of berm along Cope Lane right-of-way and 12 foot high wall on top of berm along the Santa Barbara boulevard right-of-way. ■ Deviation 4: two boundary marker signs of up to 80 square feet (per sign face) to be located along the Santa Barbara Boulevard frontage of the property on the project's wall and to exceed the maximum sign height of 8 feet for a maximum of 12 feet in height measured from the adjacent roadway centerline elevation with a minimum setback of zero feet from the property line. ■ Deviation 5: Sidewalk on one side of the roadway where the property is permitted with single loaded home sites. Appropriate crosswalks ca shall be provided at crossing locations. 3 U ■ Deviation 6: Onsite preserves to be non-contiguous. m c ■ Deviation 7: Buildings behind a wall to not be subject to LDC Sections 5.05.08 D.4., D.10., D.13., D.15., E, and F (building facades). E M U ■ Deviation 8: Parking space for the recreation facilities to be computed at 25 percent where the majority of dwelling units are within 500 a feet of the recreation facilities. 0 i �rrnl� nr Packet Pg. 1020 9.0 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.0 09/06/2018 Item Summary: PL20170001729: A Resolution amending Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order 90-3, as amended) for the Halstatt/Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact by providing for: Section One, amendments to Development Order by revising the Master Plan to relocate unbuilt access locations from Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to access locations on Livingston Road for access only to the areas of the PUD identified as FP&L easement located south of Grey Oaks Drive East; amendments to Exhibit E, Development Order access conditions and Sub -Exhibit 1, project access locations and Sub -Exhibit 2 project access conditions; Section Two, findings of fact; Section Three, conclusions of law; and Section Four, effect of previously issued Development Orders, transmittal to Department Of Economic Opportunity and effective date. The subject property is located at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Airport -Pulling Road in Sections 24, 25 and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to Agenda item PL20170001548-Grey Oaks MPUD) [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 09/06/2018 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal — Zoning Name: Nancy Gundlach 08/17/2018 1:15 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning — Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 08/17/2018 1:15 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Michael Bosi Review Item Completed 08/17/2018 4:07 PM Zoning Camden Smith Review Item Completed 08/20/2018 11:29 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Completed 08/20/2018 11:37 AM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Completed 08/20/2018 4:23 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed Growth Management Department James C French Review Item Completed 08/22/2018 4:30 PM Planning Commission Mark Strain Meeting Pending 09/06/2018 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 1021 Cotbe' v County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2018 SUBJECT: DOA-PL20170001729, GREY OAKS DRI (COMPANION TO PUDA- PL20170001548, GREY OAKS MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)) PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT AND AGENTS: Owner*: Albert O'Donnell O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. 4291 Williams Road Estero, FL 33928 * Approximately 1,046 parcels within the DRI have been sold to others. Agent: D. Wayne Arnold Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 DOA-PL20170001729, GREY OAKS DRI August 18, 2018 Page 1 of 5 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 1022 } F � ; �l j� 1R ■�' 17 or y %, whaM Fl IDLVD N a B 45-9 dJ4�9 4�e9 u4 o W r,.ry__qLwiM AYLml9j 911 IL 0j GAG 0 N819h�Jl a — Sad �IHli lid qrl mirndl dill Its }ia0H M k k a� �"-IkLL 1 9Z T DOA-PL20170001729, GREY OAKS DRI August 18, 2018 Page 2 of 5 CL ca J 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 1023 9.C.1 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner seeks a Resolution amending Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order 90-3, as amended) for the Halstatt/Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact by providing for: Section One, amendments to Development Order by revising the Master Plan to relocate unbuilt access locations from Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to access locations on Livingston Road for access only to the areas of the PUD identified as FP&L easement located south of Grey Oaks Drive East; amendments to Exhibit E, Development Order access conditions and Sub -Exhibit 1, project access locations and Sub -Exhibit 2 project access conditions; Section Two, findings of fact; Section Three, conclusions of law; and Section Four, effect of previously issued Development Orders, transmittal to Department Of Economic Opportunity and effective date. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of 1,601.39± acres, is located at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Airport -Pulling Road in Sections 24, 25, and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See Location Map on the preceding page.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The original Grey Oaks DRI DO was adopted on June 6, 1990, via DRI DO 90-292. Several changes to the original DRI DO have occurred. These are as follows: (i) Resolution No. 90-498 (Development Order No. 90-5), October 16, 1990; (ii) Resolution No. 90-571, November 27, 1990; (iii) Resolution No. 98-472 (Development Order No. 98-2), November 24, 1998; (iv) Resolution No. 98-471, November 24, 1998; (v) Resolution No. 00-190 (Development Order No. 00-04), June 27, 2000; (vi) Resolution No. 07-99 (Development Order No. 07-02), April 24, 2007; (vii) Resolution No. 09-269 (Development Order No. 09-01), November 10, 2009; and (viii) Resolution No. 13-01 (Development Order No. 13-01), June 11, 2013. The petitioner seeks an amendment to modify Exhibit E and Map H-1 attached to Development Order Number 2000-04, Resolution Number 2000-190. The amendment proposes to shift two previously approved, but unimproved project access points from Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road to Livingston Road. These two project access points shown on Map H have never been constructed; they were intended to serve as general access points to the Grey Oaks community. The two access points proposed to be shifted to Livingston Road are not intended for general access to the Grey Oaks community, but rather are intended for the sole use of a 32± acre landscape nursery located under a Florida Power and Light (FPL) easement. Please see attached Exhibit A: Proposed Resolution. DOA-PL20170001729, GREY OAKS DRI August 18, 2018 Page 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 1024 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY (DEO) : The DEO in consultation with the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC) has found that the proposed amendment does not create the likelihood of any additional regional impact, the proposed amendment does not require the filing of a Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC), and that the proposed amendment will only require an application to Collier County to amend the development order. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL (SWFRPC): As previously stated, the SWFRPC did not review the proposed amendment as a filing of a NOPC is not required. COUNTY STAFF ANALYSIS: Development authorizations contained in DRI Development Orders are prerequisites to zoning actions that implement DRI land use authorizations. DRI Development Orders are intended to address regional impacts of a project. As noted in the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) letter dated October 4, 2017 (see Attachment B), the proposed shifting of two previously approved access points from Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, to Livingston Road for the Grey Oaks DRI Development Order meets the requirements of Section 380.06(19)(e)2., Florida Statutes and does not create any additional regional impact. As noted above, the applicant is seeking to revise the Master Development Plan and amend sections of DO 2000-04. Staff recommends approval of the DRI Development Order Resolution with the understanding that there are no regional impacts, and this amendment will not adversely impact adjacent property owners or create an undue public safety concern if the DRI DO is adopted. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the staff report for Petition DOA-PL20170001729 on August 10, 2018. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward a recommendation of approval of Petition DOA-PL20170001729 to the Board of County Commissioners as described by the amending DRI Development Order resolution. DOA-PL20170001729, GREY OAKS DRI August 18, 2018 Page 4 of 5 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 1025 Attachments: Attachment A: Proposed Resolution Attachment B: Aerials Depicting Removed and Relocated Access Points Attachment C: Future Land Use Consistency Review Attachment D: Letter of Support Attachment E: Transcript of the Neighborhood Information Meeting Attachment F: Application DOA-PL20170001729, GREY OAKS DRI August 18, 2018 Page 5 of 5 9.C.1 Packet Pg. 1026 DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 18 - RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 90-292 (DEVELOPMENT ORDER 90-3, AS AMENDED) FOR THE HALSTATT/GREY OAKS DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER BY REVISING THE MASTER PLAN TO RELOCATE UNBUILT ACCESS LOCATIONS FROM AIRPORT ROAD AND GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY TO ACCESS LOCATIONS ON LIVINGSTON ROAD FOR ACCESS ONLY TO THE AREAS OF THE PUD IDENTIFIED AS FP&L EASEMENT LOCATED SOUTH OF GREY OAKS DRIVE EAST; AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT E, DEVELOPMENT ORDER ACCESS CONDITIONS AND SUB - EXHIBIT 1, PROJECT ACCESS LOCATIONS AND SUB - EXHIBIT 2 PROJECT ACCESS CONDITIONS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; AND SECTION FOUR, EFFECT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DEVELOPMENT ORDERS, TRANSMITTAL TO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD IN SECTIONS 24,25 AND 26, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (PL20170001729) WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County approved Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order No. 90-3), which approved a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) known as the Halstatt DRI (now known as the Grey Oaks DRI) on June 6, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Application for Development Approval (ADA) was incorporated into and, by reference, made a part of the Development Order; and WHEREAS, the real property which is the subject of the Development Order is legally described and set forth as Exhibit A to Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order No. 90-3); and wit: WHEREAS, the Development Order has been subsequently amended several times, to (i) Resolution No. 90-498 (Development Order No. 90-5), October 16, 1990; (ii) Resolution No. 90-571, November 27, 1990; (iii) Resolution No. 98-472 (Development Order No. 98-2), November 24, 1998; (iv) Resolution No. 98-471, November 24, 1998; (v) Resolution No. 00-190 (Development Order No. 00-04), June 27, 2000; [17 -CPS -01725/1424327/1] 57 Grey Oaks DRI-PL20170001729 Page 1 of 4 7/18/18 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 1027 9.C.2 (vi) Resolution No. 07-99 (Development Order No. 07-02), April 24, 2007; (vii) Resolution No. 09-269 (Development Order No. 09-01), November 10, 2009; and (viii) Resolution No. 13-01 (Development Order No. 13-01), June 11, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Halstatt, LLC has filed a petition to further amend Resolution No. 90- 292 (Development Order 90-3, as amended) to relocate unbuilt access points from Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to Livingston Road; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission reviewed and considered the report and recommendation of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC) and held a public hearing on ; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the governing body of the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, with jurisdiction pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider proposed changes to the Grey Oaks DRI; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing held on , the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, in accordance with Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, having considered (a) the DOA Application and the NOPC, (b) the record made at the aforementioned hearing, (c) the record of the documentary and oral evidence presented to the Collier County Planning Commission, (d) the report and recommendation of Collier County planning staff, and (d) the report and recommendation of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Counsel, the Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the following Grey Oaks DRI Development Order amendments. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER A. Exhibit H-1 of Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order No. 90-3, as amended) is hereby amended by replacing said Exhibit H-1 with a revised Exhibit H-1 attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. Exhibit E, Development Order Access Conditions and Sub -Exhibit 1, Project Access Locations and Sub -Exhibit 2, Project Access Conditions are hereby amended and replaced with Exhibits E, 1 and 2 attached hereto and incorporated herein. SECTION TWO: FINDINGS OF FACT A. The proposed changes to the previously approved Grey Oaks DRI do not meet or exceed any of the criteria listed in Section 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. [17 -CPS -01725/1424327/1157 Grey Oaks DRI-PL20170001729 Page 2 of 4 7/18/18 Packet Pg. 1028 B. Pursuant to Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, the applicant submitted the NOPC to the City of Naples, Collier County, the SWFRPC and the Department of Economic Opportunity. C. The DOA Application and the NOPC are in accordance with Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. D. The proposed changes to the previously approved Development Order are consistent with the report and recommendation of the SWFRPC. E. The development is not in an area designated an Area of Critical State Concern pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes. F. No increase in development intensity is authorized by this Resolution. SECTION THREE: CONCLUSIONS OF LAW A. The proposed changes to the previously approved Grey Oaks DRI do not constitute a substantial deviation, as set forth in Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, and therefore do not require further Development of Regional Impact review. B. The proposed changes to the previously approved Grey Oaks DRI will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the area. C. The proposed changes to the previously approved Grey Oaks DRI are consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Collier County Land Development Code adopted pursuant thereto. D. The proposed changes to the previously approved Grey Oaks DRI are consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan. SECTION FOUR: EFFECT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DEVELOPMENT ORDER AS AMENDED; TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; AND EFFECTIVE DATE A. Except as amended hereby, Development Order 90-3, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, binding in accordance with its terms on all parties thereto. B. Copies of this Development Order/Resolution shall be transmitted immediately upon execution to the Department of Economic Opportunity (Division of Community Planning and Development) and the SWFRPC. C. This Development Order/Resolution shall take effect as provided by law. [17 -CPS -01725/1424327/1] 57 Grey Oaks DRI-PL20170001729 7/18/18 Page 3 of 4 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 1029 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of _'2018. ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, INTERIM CLERK IN Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA U61A ANDY SOLIS, Chairman Attachments: Exhibit E — Development Order Access Conditions Exhibit 1 — Project Access Locations Exhibit 2 — Project Access Conditions Exhibit H-1 —Master Plan [17 -CPS -01725/1424327/1] 57 Grey Oaks DRI-PL20170001729 Page 4 of 4 7/18/18 g 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 1030 LEGEND Q RR4[DENitaT. GENERAL NOW 1) nTIAND PRZSb8YATION AREAS AM OOIP COURSH APPROMIATE AND TUL BI RMIDCED DURINO TRE PxEmrTRNG PROUSS. �' MOO1P COVBGR YADiTBNANC6 YACILM 2) AIL ACREAGES ARE APPROXIMATE AND (Q) OW COURSE CUME(OUSSSUR;= TO CHANGE AND/OR VARIATION MCKR iCY t®ICAtgVIM H=ON •TNE DWK[om NAY RELOCATE omcit/RETAIL CONNERCIAL IIP TO 200 WCLTI-FAIMY trPM OIM C0IDAERCIavEmn FROM THE WORTH = QUADRANT 79 THE NOSIHEAHT QUADRANT BO rZ=1 cAm LONG AS THE TOTAL NUNEEE O7 L IAU RES Mma UNITS IN OREY OAFS WMAND (WNSEK'ATION AREA$) DOES NOT EXCEED 1776 UNITS, I ' PARR TOTAL NATIVE NATTTE UMMSIXTiON 111TH TURN tANES AND SIGNlt1EATI0N SAM # IC(M IN AND EIGHT OUT 031.94 A.C. 137.99 A.C. =� RIGHT IN AND MOST OUT AND SOUTH BOUND LER' �. RESIDINTTAt. ACCESS ONLY solmssTQWDRRVi. 9ECURPfY GAMOUSE NORTHEALEGEND ar AND SOUTER"m 4m I)_rvR COUNTyt *MMIDi ENIIAI, 11am 89, IBES 1311 DNTrS 33 OPYIQ/REUIL Ge 1.203.091 S.F.GLA. 70.10+ OOtl COIIRSK/RECREAT10Ni72RLfI0O0'-07-1f6T LAXE 4 TA YANA 61 HOLES Et"It 226.11! CONSERTATIDN 6.82A SUBTOTAL 1217.60+ NORTRTXsr OUIBRANT t= OF XAR gi .Rrmv/in 04 UNM LOO.7tt var�n OS?IQ/RhTAII. CO)D[ERCUL 100.000 9Y.G.L.L 11.10! BOGY �/IQGIif-OY-TAY URE h TATER YANAOEf[CNT 1E Sam 107.104 7&0" CONSERVATION 65-144: eIEMOTAL must TOTAL 3X01.39+ 1DS1I. Mt IC71NA _ DOUtO�OV[9 aGO �,� ON I=r fffffffffEC��i�}1•� (CI) DAOa ti C� MAMA D1� NIX MeM�[[ M34QW1 PDEYO1Nl tnma7amm Gal 1«WN T[(WPM Da,�,N G.7E 001OR1 att D.iGABfME NORTH 9.C.2 Y R 0 U � 1 4e _ IL C 00 1 W 00 r o e 1 IL oD ¢ c RMCC w o RM W 3 v~i o N m D d LA O � Q O a a Revised by: Q. Grady Minor & AESOCIate S, P.A. D31211201E L) SSC —NP IDS AML TSC Drsn b- va3/sel r piad.l 6r. yp - ar Do , 1111! 1007 SNr 85'x11'_NTS. PE% MOISD-6!S�G02 Fib j: D-MOt'A-lYbl �% a Packet Pg. 1031 c«nnl GATE:�,r arcANCY 89WS FAR e�a>an NATIVE VEGETATION_. PRESERVES NT[ � Offfi+1SY TOTAL NATIVE NATTTE ViGETATION VEGETATION TEOVATION SAM # 031.94 A.C. 137.99 A.C. 137 -DD A.C. # 0.33JME3 0 C9 nUFb 3nvF9 iN rA3TEftN M03T MR:fl. solmssTQWDRRVi. T[(WPM Da,�,N G.7E 001OR1 att D.iGABfME NORTH 9.C.2 Y R 0 U � 1 4e _ IL C 00 1 W 00 r o e 1 IL oD ¢ c RMCC w o RM W 3 v~i o N m D d LA O � Q O a a Revised by: Q. Grady Minor & AESOCIate S, P.A. D31211201E L) SSC —NP IDS AML TSC Drsn b- va3/sel r piad.l 6r. yp - ar Do , 1111! 1007 SNr 85'x11'_NTS. PE% MOISD-6!S�G02 Fib j: D-MOt'A-lYbl �% a Packet Pg. 1031 9.C.2 UVA :•! :i:.r: #:#: •:tii+ i' i' +# ar... «tE% `\.i^'u a to bit t.r r i i • �• ,r: # # ;, .,: p Vii" . •# t : ! # :# f t i- � ....may M � ��/ w • .w7 11 .t '!t.*."a: t # to • U Z 1 IN ! :!!;f- . •. +}# :,i +IIY.,. •Y , f : •;I: t tx: # !!,Y#►4 .s�lY: . K:t.. � , R,i ^ti ec •ice tt :! . i t t � fisLi � '��. fif`# ��•rr # �,.. ,�,,.. �/ �� •'�' ► »,i .ILI "MmS 900, 4 .� ; Y'S• t• l,a ♦� ®' . 1 1 D. Civil Engineers - Land Surveyors Planners . Landscape Architects PUD MASTER PLAN MAP H-1 RonitzSprings: 239.947A144 Fort My— 239,690.4380 Packet Pg. 1032 Elv��}ZG�IJ ACXUlSV= Ey 9.C.2 of M t0 Packet Pg. 1033 w owl, .( !!tu CL /LI - 0.VISED /14/2018 M t0 Packet Pg. 1033 EN LAPGEb 9.C.2 TOTAL leo1.34t _ " C% fr �t1YAL pon�cnxa ssau€oovBss p21 tD (CP STAMP ,�- - f f n�Q IL XLKMMWAXY acsoaL f:� ° f (� !' /• !! � !` !` f; `fir : ! !! '!! /,! ! (m Sli ILL UNDVIIIIA1M r WAtl W >�ttrM1KY pflIlSCt�tFXA ,...............•......•....•• � --------.,. P7KS1WINi+AL {pit} N Tn vwxTamm PRHSRMR GAIT FW OTWASe 19 26% I1ATM TOTAL NATIVE NATM VEt xUllON ((n� VZOVATION MULTION SAVED 561.% A.C. 137.44 A.G. 137.44 A.C. * ASSUMES 0.89 ACRES SAVED IN EAStERN MAST PARCEL. O N SOUTHEAST OUACRANT. ou VAPUN.T.S. SC— LEGEND GREY OAKS © GradyMinor tl.,i Bl xor axd seoo Avi.a5 wn111ur1aes REVISED A-li SpOmp"Flxrldz 34134 06/I4/20' 8 ArEOPu Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors Planners . Landscape Architects PUD MASTER PLAN — MAP H-1 ❑ x—E - Cen.of1xlh.EB0005151 1ert.of.—LB01105151 MA-- Ll, 2G000266 PxOPo5E0 um ry 11IIB Bonita Spmagx. 239.947.1144 x x.I:lady7linnl. rnnr Forl hlve-239690,4380 SHEET 3 OF 4 Packet Pg. 1034 9.C.2 a s a , t glj VJ z CL cc W :.A•i'' tt �� los / °• CO fit=?AM A D� ,' ff I/ t4311tAlj r ' ItA �Ct�it 1PRT. 1r t 1170�t oIN Revised by: Y Q. Grady Minor & ° Associates: P.A. ."' e 0611412018 C#C�e a I` •� o a L =—TV 4" Rte 23E a ME!!! 1r ormon t- MAW r� W1R 2007 N 0 1 ( 8.5' x 11" = PI.T.S. VV Put 1`10124 -ass -M FRe # : D-tt0128-182-1 NAPUCO FROOMIM PAU NORTH sheet � � N.T.S. LEGEND GREY OAKS ©GradyMinor ae1�,nDraDd' IV1D1Pbsl DerD auuBwDurlecy REVISED ,pa,�, Ra n10 springy. f1id. 34134 06/14/2018 DATE: Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects PUD MASTER PLAN — MAP H-1 na uue i Cert. aA.N EE 0005151 Cart.MA.W LE0005151 6uslutaa LC 2COnD260 vxOVDStD Y�V 1Qi9 S Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 x. f, i•aAvt/innr.Inm Fon. Afyern: 239.690.4390 SHEET 4 OF 4 m O ,L^ V is 2 C14 N I- CD O O ti O ' N J a c) M le Packet Pg. 1035 5/03/90 5/23/90 6/11/90 Revised 5/25/00 Revised 7/20/2017 REVISED EXHIBIT E GREY OAKS PUD/DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER ACCESS CONDITIONS The Grey Oaks DRI shall construct at no cost to Collier County all site -related improvements providing direct access to the Project as deemed necessary by the Collier County Transportation Division including all project access points on Airport Road, Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road and all site -related improvements required within the DRI. The developer's obligation for these improvements shall include the full costs of design and engineering, utility relocation, right-of-way acquisition and dedication (if any), construction of turn lanes, acceleration and deceleration lanes, construction inspection, contract administration, testing and signalization (as needed and warranted). The alignment, design, signalization and construction schedule for these improvements shall be approved by the Collier County Transportation Division. 2. Access to Golden Gate Parkway, Airport Road and Livingston Road shall be limited to those access points and lane configurations as schematically depicted in the drawing titled Project Access Locations, Golden Gate Parkway Conceptual Roadway Master Plan, Lane Arrangements For Site Access with Interchanges, Sheet 1 oft and dated 4/11/89 and revised 5/23/90, 6/11/90, and 5/25/00 and included as Revised Exhibit 1 and more fully described in Revised Exhibit 2 titled Grey Oaks DRI Project Access Conditions. The modified Project access is presented in Revised Exhibit 1 and Revised Exhibit 2. Changes from the original approved access are summarized below. Revised Access Plan Driveway Original Plan 1 Full Access 2 Full Access, (Later Right In/Out) 3 Full Access (T Intersection) 3C Not Included 4 Full Access (T Intersection) Revised Plan No Change No Change Full Access (Four Way -3A & 313, Shifted East) Right Eliminated Full Access J Intersection, Shifted East) Page J of ;L 9.C.2 Packet Pg. 1036 i 9.C.2 REVISED EXHIBIT E (continued) 5 Full Access (T Intersection) Full Access J Intersection, Shifted East) 6 Full Access No Change 6A & B Not Included Right-In/Out 7 Full Access No Change 8A & 8 B Full Access Full Access (Shifted North) 8C Right In/Out No Change 8D Not Included Dir-eetienal ^ eeessEliminated 9 Full Access Eliminated 10 Right In/Out Eliminated 11 Right In/Out Eliminated 12 Full Access No Change 13 Right In/Out Eliminated It is recognized that ultimate access control is available to local government through exercise of its police powers based on health, safety and welfare considerations. In addition to such ultimate access control, and the access controls identified in Revised Exhibit 2, additional controls could include signal system directional phasing (decreasing side street green) and additional turn lanes. 3. Traffic signals at the Project access points, as warranted, shall be interconnected and coordinated with the adjacent signalized intersections along Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway. In an effort to ensure the maximum signal progression possible along Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, certain green bands for progression purposes have been identified and evaluated by the Collier County Transportation Division. The signal progression bands identified by Collier County reflect Collier County's operational decision to provide preferential treatment to thru movements. This condition means that east/west Golden Gate Parkway thru movements and north/south Airport Road thru movements will be given preference over the Project's intersecting side street movements. 4. Permanent access to Project maintenance buildings shall be reviewed and approved by the Collier County Transportation Division. Access to the maintenance building in the North Quad shall be via Livingston Road. Full or partial access onto Livingston Road shall be dependent on the driveway location, level of service operations on Livingston Road and cross section of Livingston Road. Provided that proper turn lanes are installed and level of service standards are maintained on Livingston Road, full access shall be provided under a two, four and six lane cross section. It is recognized that ultimate access control is available to local government through exercise of its police powers based on health, safety and welfare considerations. In addition to such ultimate access control, additional controls could include signal system directional phasing, additional turn lanes and median closures and restricted turn lanes. Construction access shall be reviewed on a case by case basis by the Collier County Transportation Division. Page 'a. Of Packet Pg. 1037 REVISED EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT ACCESS LOCATIONS D%VEWAY %I RESIDEROADWAY JI EXISTING BEARS PAW ENTRANCE EXISTING POINCIANA DRNEWAY p7 VILLAGE ENTRANCE � RESIO- ROADWAY EXISTING POINCIANA ALLACE ENTRANCE DOSTING" COACH HOUSE LANE p Q EXISTING ELEMENTARY J1O d SCHOOL ENTRANCE 7III a DRIVEWAY In OFFICE/COMMERCIAL DRNEWAY JBC DRIVEWAY +2 OFFlCE/COMME RCV+L EXISTING POINCIANA OFFICE ENTRANCE W� GREY OAKS DM ORNEWAY /BA COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE COMMERCIAL ENTRANCES DRIVEWAY ELIMINATED �DRNEWAY W DRNEWAY #4 DRIVEWAY }38 DRNEWAY JS RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY DRIVEWAY #6B DRIVEWAY #6A GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY DRIVEWAY 05 LEGEND A DRNEWAY gTz 4(> SIGNAL RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY LANE ARRANGEMENTS 99587/098/0500 CONCEPTUAL ROADWAY FOR SITE ACCESS Revisedo7rzaizoi7 MASTER PLAN WITH INTERCHANGE of 9.C.2 O m L ca M m 2 01 N I- 04 N J O d a {i M t0 T A0 � Packet Pg. 1038 REVISED EXHIBIT 1 (CONTINUED) 0 N 500' RIGHT FN/OUT DRNEYYAY COMMERCIAL ENTRANCES OFFICE/COMMERCIAL o 0 ACCESS ELIMINATED � -A661�-9NEY FULL a- a �_ ILII MOVE)AEN7 ACCESS RIGHT IN OUT Q IIIN�� ACCESS ONLY Til EXISTING POINCIANA OFFICE ENTRANCE RIGHT IN/DIA ACCESS ONLY Golden Gate/Airport Road interchange geometric layout developed and prepared by Wilson Miller, Inc. Exhibit produced by David Plummer & Associates, Inc. Revised by Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. - 2017 BI GREY OAKS DRI GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY III LEFT TURN ACCESS TO THE NORTH COMMERCML ENTRANCE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED FROM THE AIRPORT ROAD EASTBOUND ON—RAMP TO GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY. LEGEND 40► PROPOSE➢ TRAFnC V SIGNAL LDrATION GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY 99587/09VO500 CONCEPTUAL ROADWAY URBAN INTERCHANGE Revised07/2412017 MASTER PLAN DETAILS 2 of 2� Packet Pg. 1039 5/03/90 5/23/90 6/11/90 Revised 5/25/2000 Revised 07/16/2018 REVISED EXHIBIT 2 GREY OAKS DRI PROJECT ACCESS CONDITIONS Area Development Driveway Arterial Roadway Served (2) Phase - Opening Access Conditions I Golden Gate Parkway West Quad — • Full access, four way intersection under six lane divided Residential 2/3 roadway. Located to align with the Bear's Paw Service Entrance. Project left and right tum lanes. • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if warranted, subject to interconnect and signal progression. 2 Golden Gate Parkway West Quad - • Prior to grade separation at Golden Gate Parkway/ Office/Commercial 2/3 Airport Road: (3) • Full access, four way intersection under four and six lane divided roadway and aligned with existing Poinciana Office Park. Project left and right tum lanes. • With grade separation at Golden Gate Parkway/Airport Road: (3) • Right tum in and out only access. 9.C.2 U) M O m C7 LA M 2 M N I- CD 0 ti 0 N o cis 00 Packet Pg. 1040 9.C.2 M Y 3A/313 Golden Gate Parkway North Quad - + • Full access, "four-way" intersection under four and six O South Quad 2/3 lane divided roadway. Project dual inbound and outbound left tum lanes (subject to traffic monitoring) and separate right turn lanes.) M LI • Signalization subject to Collier County Transportation N Division approval and subject to interconnect and signal n Packet Pg. 10 171 progression. o 0 ti • With Golden Gate Parkway/Airport Road grade o separation, left turn access from the Airport Road -1 eastbound on-ramp to Golden Gate Parkway will be a prohibited. (3) M C Golden Gate Parkway North Quad — Town Center 2/3 • Right iWout ono Driveway Eliminated. 4 Golden Gate Parkway North Quad - + • Full access, "T" intersection under four and six lane c ^ r c Office 2/3 divided roadway. Project dual left turn lanes and A 00 separate right turn lanes. c • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if o warranted, subject to interconnect and signal progression. 0 U) CD 5 Golden Gate Parkway South Quad — 2/3 • Full access, "T" intersection under four and six lane Residential/Hotel divided roadway. Project left and right turn lanes. a� 0 • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if 0 warranted, subject to interconnect and signal a progression. Q • With Golden Gate Parkway/Livingston Road grade c m separation, left turn access from the Livingston Road M westbound on-ramp to Golden Gate Parkway will be M prohibited. (3) Q CD E M a Packet Pg. 10 171 9.C.2 M Y 6 Livingston Road North Quad - + Full access under two, four and six lane divided M 2/3 roadway. Project left and right turn lanes. Located to align with Wyndemere Entrance. • Signalization subject to signal warrant study. Packet Pg. 1042 M C6 N 6A Livingston Road North Quad - + • Separate access to FPL parcel. c 2/3 c ti 6B Livingston Road North Quad - + • Separate access to FPL parcel. 0 a 2/3 O M 7 Airport Road North Quad - 1 • Full access under six lane divided roadway. Aligned ^ Residential with existing north Poinciana Village Entrance. Project left and right tum lanes. 06, oo • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if o warranted, subject to interconnect and signal progression. 8A Airport Road North Quad — + • Full access, under six lane divided roadway. Aligned 0 Town Center 2/3 with future access to West Quad (Driveway 8B). Project dual left tum lanes (subject to traffic monitoring) and right tum lane. N 0 a • Signalization subject to Collier County Transportation Division approval and subject to interconnect and signal a progression. Q r 8B Airport Road West Quad 2/3 • Full access under six lane divided roadway. Aligned c 0 with North Quad - Town Center Entrance (Driveway 8 t A). Project dual left tum lanes and right tum lane 8C Airport Road West Quad — 2/3 • Right in and out only access under six lane divided Q Office/Commercial roadway. (3) E t R J.A r Q Packet Pg. 1042 81) Airport Road North Quad 2/3 0 Dir-eetional median opening: inbound left and fight tufn lane, outbound right tum lane. Driveway eliminated. 9 Airport Road South Quad — 2 . Driveway eliminated. Residential/Office/ Commercial 10 Livingston Road South Quad — • Driveway Eliminated. Residential 1 I Livingston Road South Quad — • Driveway Eliminated. Residential 12 Livingston Road South Quad — 2/3 • Full access, "T"' intersection under two, four and six lane Residential divided roadway. (4) • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if warranted, subject to interconnect to Golden Gate Parkway. 13 Livingston Road South Quad — • Driveway Eliminated. Residential Footnotes: 1) See Project Access Locations, Golden Gate Parkway Conceptual Roadway Master Plan, Lane Arrangement For Site Access With Interchanges, Sheet 1 of 2, dated April 11, 1989 and revised January 8, 1990, May 23. 1990, June 11, 1990, and May 25, 2000. 2) See Halstatt DRI Master Development Plan. Revised Exhibit 11. 3) Access conditions identified with east/west Golden Gate Parkway grade separated at Livingston Road and Airport Road. Should the final design and construction of the urban interchange be substantially different than that shown in Exhibit 1 with Livingston Road and/or Airport Road grade separated rather than Golden Gate Parkway, the final improvements may result in modifications to the above access restrictions. 4) If Livingston Road is grade separated at Golden Gate Parkway, the full median opening identified at Driveway #12 may be shifted north or south at the time of its construction. 9.C.2 r- 0 0 0 0 m Gl El Packet Pg. 1043 III OOP 7o, -�g N 40�1 tU� Af%. or IT. t IA Fig 141916 A 0 Z, ;3 IL lUdi r IQ NORM S-0 - 10. LEGEND 0. Grady Minor an! Asse GradyMincirauto 9.C.4 �i0�8Y �i07�l.7�lty Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA # 1244, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: July 10, 2018 Subject: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: DOA - PL20170001729 Review 3 PETITION NAME: Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting to amend the Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order (DO) #13-01, as amended, to: • Update the PUD Master Plan — Map `11-1' remove/eliminate two access points (that were previously approved to serve the Grey Oaks community, but have remained unimproved and are currently shown on the approved Master Plan - one on Airport -Pulling Road and one on Golden Gate Parkway.) This amendment will add two access points on Livingston Road that are not intended for general access to the Grey Oaks community, but merely to serve only the ±32 acre O'Donnell Landscapes. The total number of access points for the Grey Oaks DRI will remain unchanged. • Modify Exhibit `E' to show the two eliminated access points on Airport -Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway (Access Points `3C' and `8D' as also shown in Revised Exhibit `2'). Exhibit `E' is also modified to show the two new Access Points on Livingston Road (Access Points `6A' and `6B' as also shown in Revised Exhibit `2'. All four locations are shown on the Golden Gate Parkway Conceptual Roadway Master Plan (Revised Exhibit `1'). • The second petition submission included additional minor changes to the PUD Master Plan to add street names and show a 12' wide easement adjacent to Livingston Road right- of-way for a future pathway; revisions to TIS; and a no -objection letter from the president of the HOA. • The third submittal included an email letter of `no objection' from Grey Oaks General Manager in reference to this petition of revised access. The response letter from the applicant indicated that transportation revisions to include a pathway easement exhibit were made to the PUDA documents with the applicant's third submittal. LOCATION: The ±1,601.39 -acres Grey Oaks PUD property is located in the northeast, southeast, and northwest quadrants of Airport -Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway, in Sections 24, 25 and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County and the City of Naples, Florida. The northwest quadrant Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 1046 9.C.4 consisting of 354 acres is within the City of Naples. The northeast and southeast quadrants, consisting of 1,247 acres (including the 32 acres adjacent to Livingston Road), are located in Collier County. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property, containing approximately 11,601 acres, is partially designated Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, partially designated Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict #8, and partially designated Incorporated Areas (City of Naples), as depicted on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. According to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), the Urban designation areas will accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential uses, including recreational uses (such as golf courses). Consistency with FLUE designations (uses, intensities, etc.) and FLUE Policies 5.4 and 7.1 — 7.4 are addressed by staff in the companion Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) consistency review. CONCLUSION Based upon the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed amendment consistent with the FLUE. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section DOA-PL2017-1729 Grey Oaks R3.docx Zoning Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104 • 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 1047 9.C.5 Sharon Umpenhour From: Jim Butler <JButler@greyoakscc.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 12:28 PM To: Wayne Arnold Cc: Rafael Silva; John English (JEnglish @barroncolIier.com); Jeannie Manos Subject: FW: Grey Oaks Access for O'Donnell Nursery Attachments: JimButler 06-2017L.PDF; Access Relocation Exhibit.pdf Wayne, Grey Oaks has no objection to this proposal. Both the Country Club and the Property Owner's Chairmen, and myself, the General Manager has approved. Please let this email serve as official notice if possible. Thanks Jim ,dim ButCer Generaf,'Wanager 2400 Grey Oaks Drive North Naples, FL 34105 (239) 262-5550 (Club) (239) 262-3593 (Fax) Email: JButlercr�GrevOaksCC.com www.Grey0aksCC.co Note: If you have received this communication in error please delete all copies of the original message and attachments. From: Jim Butler Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:03 PM To: Jim Butler Subject: FW: Grey Oaks Access for O'Donnell Nursery ,dim ButCer Generaf�Uanager 4jreV Oak; 2400 Grey Oaks Drive North Naples, FL 34105 (239) 262-5550 (Club) (239) 262-3593 (Fax) Email: JButlercr�GrevOaksCC.com www.Grey0aksCC.co Note: If you have received this communication in error please delete all copies of the original message and attachments. From: Wayne Arnold[mai Ito: WArnoldCcbgradyminor.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 8:27 AM To: Jim Butler Packet Pg. 1048 9.C.5 Cc: 'John English'; Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Grey Oaks Access for O'Donnell Nursery Hello Jim, I am assisting Al O'Donnell with his landscape nursery improvements within the FP&L easement adjacent to Livingston Road. Al is trying to obtain dedicated access for his nursery operations from Livingston Road. We are proposing to amend the Grey Oaks PUD and DRI master plans to eliminate two previously approved but unused access points and add the two proposed access points on Livingston Road. We would appreciate it if you could review the attached information and provide us with a letter of no objection. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact John English or me. Thank you, Wayne Y M D. Wayne Arnold, AICP O Planning Director L B r dyMinor T 3800 Via Del Rey C6 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 04 Phone - 239.947.1144 c Fax - 239.947.0375 c Web - http://www.aradyminor.com 0 N J IL DISCLAIMER: This communication from Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., along with any attachments or electronic data is intended only for the addressee(s) named above and may Cn contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or otherwise exempt from disclosure. The recipient agrees and accepts the following conditions: The electronic file/data is for M informational purposes only and is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this electronic file/data with the approved and certified 'plan of record" along with actual project site 14 conditions. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. reserves the right to revise, update and improve its electronically stored data without notice and assumes no responsibility due to a virus or damages caused by receiving this email. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 1049 9.C.6 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Wayne Arnold: Okay, let's get the meeting started I guess. I'm Wayne Arnold. I'm with Grady Minor and Associates. This is Sharon Umpenhour from our office. She'll be recording the meeting tonight. Uh, The County requires that we record these meetings and then create a — a verbatim transcript of the meeting in support of the planning commission members and the County Commissioners to review. Uh, with us tonight, Al O'Donnell is the property owner of the subject property tonight. And, Norm Trebilcock is Tranportation Engineer. John English behind him is with Barron Collier Companies Peninsula Engineering, he's the engineering record. And, um, this is Nancy Gundlach. Nancy is with Collier County Government. — Nancy Gundlach: — Hello. Wayne Arnold: — She's principal planner and she's here to monitor and answer any County related questions but, technically it's our meeting to explain to the members of the public what it is that we're attempting to do. So, we'll try to do that. I have a brief presentation and then turn it over to anybody who might have a question. So, what we're doing is amending the zoning document that's required of the Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact and the Planned Unit Development zoning. They had one common master plan for both of those documents. And, what we're proposing to do is to eliminate two unused access points. One on Airport Road and one on Golden Gate Parkway, and then create two new access points on Livingston Road that would only serve Mr. O'Donnell's property. He's got about 32 acres that is encumbered entirely under the FP&L easement south of the Grey Oaks entrance on the west side of Livingston Road. And, The County requires us to go through this process. So, we'll be going through the process of creating a new Master Plan exhibit. The County has asked us to create a couple of cleanup items in the PUD document itself, one of which is to allow them to build a multi- use path someday across a portion of Mr. O'Donnell's property. So, we'll have a commitment that allows them to do that. That'll be added. But, um, it's related to the request for the access point. That's an overall aerial exhibit outline of all of Grey Oaks. You can see that it's almost entirely built out. It's about 1600 acres and about 1600 dwelling units with commercial components and senior housing. That's, uh, the approved Master Concept Plan. It's hard to Page 1 of 10 Packet Pg. 1050 9.C.6 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM see but the access points there for instance, there for instance, main entrance here, main entrance over here, those are shown on the Master Plan, and that's what we're attempting to revise. You can see it — it's really hard to read on — here, let me go to the different exhibit to show that more clearly. This is an excerpt of the Master Plan but the two clouded areas on the south and west, that's an unused access point that was going to serve as a commercial tract at the Grey Oaks project. And then, the other one is on Golden Gate Parkway, where the arrow is, and it — it's labelled, "Relocate access point" up here. And then, if you look to the right of the page we're showing the two proposed relocated access points that would only serve — thank you whoever has them — the pointer, they uh, that would only serve Mr. O'Donnell's property within the — FP&L ea — FP&L easement. Those would not be access points that would service a — any of the residential component of the Grey Oaks PUD. This is a little bit of a, aerial exhibit that shows more of the FP&L easement and you can see the relationship of the proposed access points that we're showing. There's a directional left turn made right now and we're proposing that that would continue to be a directional left into this parcel, and then, on the south end where the construction road was just north of the FP&L facility, that would be a right and right of access point servicing Mr. O'Donnell's operation. The PUD is — been approved. All the uses are permitted. We're not proposing any new uses for the PUD. So, it allows for storage that FP&L easement allows for maintenance yard, landscape nurseries, et cetera, and we will be doing everything that's permitted under the PUD. And, that in a nutshell was — say, I'm gonna put this other exhibit back up, just to show you again on the Master Plan. But, that's really in essence the — the amendments that we're proposing to the PUD. I'd be happy to answer any questions. I know we've had a few emails from, probably some of your neighbors, but, um, anything we can answer we'll certainly try. Jean Foster: Just, uh, to clarify — Wayne Arnold: — Okay, if I could, one —just for one second. We're — The County's been very particular about, uh, getting things on the record so, if I could have anybody who wants to speak just speak into the microphone — Page 2 of 10 Packet Pg. 1051 9.C.6 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Jean Foster: — Okay. Wayne Arnold: — so we make sure that it's recorded, and if you don't mind giving your name. Jean Foster: Sure, sure. Not my social security — Wayne Arnold: — Correct. Jean Foster: Okay. Jean Foster: Um, my name is Jean Foster, and I live in Wyndemere Country Club, which is directly opposite the, uh, the property. Uh, one of the questions I have is, just so that I — I'm clear about it, uh, to enter the property heading northbound on Livingston from Golden Gate, you would be able to turn left in that turn lane and cut across traffic? Wayne Arnold: Yes, this is Wayne Arnold again. And yes, there is an existing left turn lane, and you're familiar with it I'm sure. — Jean Foster: — Right. Wayne Arnold: — It's south of your entrance and south of the signalized intersection with y — with Grey Oaks and Wyndemere. So yes, the idea would be that that turn lane would then create a drive entrance into Mr. O'Donnell's property and that would be his northern most entrance. And then, we have the southern entrance that's much closer to the FP&L facility. Ron Coleman: Um, Ronald Coleman and I also live in Wyndemere. Regarding the same entrance, we see a problem, um, at the northern end of Livingston Road where people cut across and go in the reverse on those left turn lanes, so they can go — in — in this case they would be going south, uh — when you're leaving the, um, for instance, um, the shopping center where, um, Starbucks is and so forth. They would come back by the tire store and then they'll be watching. And so, then they'll sneak across in or what is a turn lane into the shopping center, but they'll do the reverse and then go south. Uh, that's a problem. Also, I'm sure everyone aware — is aware here that, people will go down Livingston at approximately 55 and 60 miles an hour. We witnessed that this afternoon. We were doing, you know, five miles over the speed limit, but these, a BMW and a Lexus went speeding by in — significantly faster. And, you can check with the, uh, Police Department, they'll verify that. Uh, I'm concerned about trucks cutting across at that entrance, uh, the proposed entrance there Page 3 of 10 Packet Pg. 1052 9.C.6 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM across Livingston, because I think that that's going to be a real [inaudible] [00:07:22], and as Jean mentioned earlier, also in the morning, traffic going south on Livingston there is already backed up, uh, 15 minutes to try to get from — Jean Foster: — Sometimes. Ron Coleman: — you know, sometimes in season. To try to get from the, um, Wyndemere grounds traffic signal, down to the, uh, Golden Gate. And, if you have trucks going across there, it's not going to be manageable. Wayne Arnold: Thank you. Again, this is Wayne Arnold. The — The reason that Mr. O'Donnell likes the left end rather than having to use the main entrance gate at Grey Oaks is it's convenient directly into his site and it doesn't then have to use the gated access at Grey Oaks. But, having the signal there creates a gap for his trucks to make that turning movement so, when cars are stopped at the light you get a safe passage across and, Norm I don't know if you want to add anything else but, that's kind of the reason that it makes a very good break — natural break for the traffic flow. Al O'Donnell: Let me just — you can save a lot of money — Wayne Arnold: — S — S — Introduce yourself too. Al O'Donnell: Al O'Donnell. I can save a lot of money by not doing any of this, but, — Al O'Donnell: we thought that the Grey Oaks and the Wyndemere people would object strongly to us using the other intersection. — Jean Foster: — Well, that's correct, yes — Male Speaker: — Absolutely. Al O'Donnell: — So that's — that's we — we're making our own entry at significant expense and hassle — Ron Coleman: — Yeah. Jean Foster: Yeah. Al O'Donnell: — because we had to go through all this to change the entries and the DRI. Page 4 of 10 Packet Pg. 1053 9.C.6 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Ron Coleman: We're not arguing against you — Al O'Donnell: — NO. Ron Coleman: — we're just concerned about — about the speed and — Al O'Donnell: — Hmm, hmm. Ron Coleman: — you know, the access it causes. Al O'Donnell: Right. Okay. Ron Coleman: So much for that. Wayne Arnold: Okay, thanks. Any other questions? Comments? Male Speaker: [Inaudible] [00:09:01]. Wayne Arnold: Yes sir. Let me get you the microphone. Mike Donaghue: Mike Donaghue with Grey Oaks. Uh, I agree with the, uh, people previously. Uh, the traffic is a major problem and a while back in the newspaper it talked about Naples, that everybody was 20 miles over the speed limit so, — [Laughter] Mike Donaghue: — uh, it just, sort of the, uh, article that was in the paper. That will be a major problem. Uh, I'm concerned about laden trucks, noise, no retailer's gonna be there I understand. It's gonna be a wholesale. There're gonna be lights on the property for nightlights. Wayne Arnold: Thank you for your questions. Well, the PUD and the DRI set up some landscape nurseries, and I think that at the — probably initially Mr. O'Donnell's gonna operate that as wholesale operation but it doesn't preclude there from being retails operations there at some point in the future. Mike Donaghue: It doesn't preclude it? Wayne Arnold: It does not preclude it. With regard to lighting, Al or John, I don't know if you can address that question. I don't know the answer to that if you need... Page 5 of 10 Packet Pg. 1054 9.C.6 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Al O'Donnell: We had envisioned possible — possibly some security lightings in some areas. Um, there's a huge berm between, you know, Grey Oaks and this property, it's, you know, 10 foot plus, plus plants on top. I mean, certainly if we do lighting it would, you know, attempt to, you know, direct it towards the river wide of it, not towards Grey Oaks. Wayne Arnold: I think too, just so it's clear, all of his property encumbered under the Florida Power and Light easement area, which means there are restrictions and you have to get approvals from Florida Power and Light. For instance, you can't put things that are taller than 14 feet under their powerline easement et cetera. So, — Male Speaker: — No taller than 14 feet would be? Wayne Arnold: — Is that the planted material height or is that any high [inaudible] [00:11:00] — Male Speaker: — Everything. Wayne Arnold: Everything. Male Speaker: Yeah, the recent Condo was — Male Speaker: — No structures at all. Wayne Arnold: Right. No permanent structures permitted by FP&L there. Ron Coleman: One other question please. Uh, Ron Coleman again from Wyndemere. Would you define where you've got a, uh, area of weeds and grass and then you have a line of trees and then you have another area of weeds and grass and then you have Grey Oaks. What — what's planned with the line of trees there? Wayne Arnold: This is Wayne again. The existing vegetation that makes up the berm and landscape buffer that was planted by Grey Oaks will be untouched. It remains heavily — Wayne Arnold: — as Mr. O'Donnell mentioned, as a earth and berm and then it's got the — extensive mature vegetation on it. And, Mr. O'Donnell probably will be installing some more container plants in areas where The County in our, at least preliminary converstations have talked about if there were going to be storage areas or vehicles stored that they would look for landscape materials to be placed there, um, in addition to the landscape buffer that was already there. Al O'Donnell: Al O'Donnell again. I think what you're asking is about all the trees Page 6 of 10 Packet Pg. 1055 9.C.6 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM down the center. Ron Coleman: Yes, yes. Al O'Donnell: Well, it's absolutely illegal for me to have a big tree but, FP&L can do they want. — [Laugh] Al O'Donnell: — They have 50 foot trees in there, which, — Ron Coleman: Do you plan on leaving [inaudible] [00:12:23] — Al O'Donnell: — you know, I would be shot for but, you know... Ron Coleman: Are those coming down or are you planning on leaving them? Al O'Donnell: Um, I think as I develop a bit more and more, uh, most of them will come down. I made though within a north half south half, so they get cut. Now, I will be required by The County to take away all the invasive — invasive exotics in that area. There's a lot of — like, over half of those plants are not ones that The County wants to see there. Um, one other caveat — there's not structures allowed there now. Their people have said to me, "Well in the future, when we all get solar in our houses, do you think we'll need three sets of powerlines?" So, — [Laugh] Al O'Donnell: — I — I hope that my grandkids will — will be able to get this property without powerlines [inaudible]. But, we'll see. [Laughter] Wayne Arnold: Thanks Al. Yes sir. Mike Donaghue: Mike Donaghue again. What are the days and hours of operation that we would see somebody on that property? Wayne Arnold: Al, do you want to take a shot at this one? Al O'Donnell: Sure, I'd love to. Um, historically my company works from seven in the morning to, you know, five, six, seven at night. Um, people get there in the 06:30 range occasionally. Um, people might get there a little earlier and just wait for things to start. Uh, we don't have night operations. I recently, for the first time in my life did a job on Page 7of10 Packet Pg. 1056 9.C.6 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM 41 — US 41 east and all of the work was required to be done at night so... Wayne Arnold: — I — I think it's — Al O'Donnell: — In 30 years I did three night works, so... Ron Coleman: And days, if I may [Inaudible] [00:14:16] — Wayne Arnold: — My name is Wayne Arnold I just want to verify that there's an exception to the rule and, Al is subject to as growing plants that the whims of nature and freeze protection so there may be activities related to that. You know, — Al O'Donnell: — Hurricanes. Wayne Arnold: — preparations for hurricanes et cetera. So... Ron Coleman: Days of operation? Al O'Donnell: Um, my company works six days a week. We hardly ever work Sundays, but if — in, a place like this once the nursery was — was farther along and we had, you know, five, 10 acres of plants you would probably have one or two people stopping by to check the water on a Sunday where, if — not in the rainy season. Male Speaker: [Inaudible] Wayne Arnold: Yes sir. Michael Stoll: Michael Stoll, Grey Oaks. Uh, question. Uh, on the maintenance of material that is on the bluff currently is maintained by a combination of FPL, uh, on behalf [inaudible] closer to their powerlines, which are adjacent to the fence. And, then there's parts of that that we maintain. When I say "we" I mean Grey Oaks. Um, are we gonna have access to that area? Uh, is it gonna be a maintenance bluff. We're never gonna reach and access and, part two, where's the water gonna get — come from? Wayne Arnold: Thank you. Al, with the answer to the question about maintenance, I assume of their berm from your side. If they're currently using the FP&L easement for maintenance I'm assuming that you will allow that to continue. Al O'Donnell: Yeah. I — I — I don't have any problem with — with maintaining an Page 8 of 10 Packet Pg. 1057 9.C.6 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM access — maintenance access and, you guys might want to get to — to my side of your fences from my property. Um, it's — there's gonna be keys on the locks of course. When I fence and — and block those roads, we'll have to have locks for [inaudible] FP&L and I have no problem with you guys also having any access along there. Wayne Arnold: Are you gonna answer the question about the water too? Michael Stoll: Where you're getting your water? Al O'Donnell: W — I [inaudible] to put wells down. They, um, I wanted to dig a lake but FP&L said no. Um, so, um, maybe John can speak from an engineering point. Uh, the only place we could get water — we're planning to have at least two wells. Male Speaker: Is that...? Male Speaker: [Inaudible]. Wayne Arnold: Thank you. Yes ma'am. Jean Foster: Jean Foster. Uh, one question. Uh, I was kind of surprised by this multi -use path that The County is asking to set aside to get some land for. When is that gonna be building? What if — where do the plans — does it go? How far north does it go? Where does it go? [Laugh] Wayne Arnold: This is Wayne. I — I wish we had an answer for you but The County doesn't have the money to construct it. That's why they're asking Mr. O'Donnell to provide an easement for it so when they decide to go ahead and move forward on construction of it, they could do that within, uh, — an easement across his property. It's my understanding that this plan, uh, would link all the way into Lee County up to, um, Livingston Road and to the Imperial Parkway area in Lee County. It's on a long range transportation pathway plan. But, I don't believe there's any timeframe or monies dedicated to it. Jean Foster: So who — so, who owns the p — it — it's on your — it — it's on his property. Wayne Arnold: Correct. Jean Foster: Okay. Oh, interesting. [Laugh] Wayne Arnold: So, The County — Page 9 of 10 Packet Pg. 1058 9.C.6 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Jean Foster: — Kind of like a rental lease. Wayne Arnold: — The County is — well The County is asking for there to be that easement so they could construct it when necessary. So, Al would be cooperating with them regarding the location on his property. The County has some other easements and hopefully we can comingle their easements over his property. Male Speaker: Um, Wayne. Wayne Arnold: You don't want to? Norm Trebilcock: Uh, Norm Trebi — Trebilcock for the record. Just to, uh, maybe in answer to that. The Honda dealership that was recently developed right there at Pine Ridge in Livingston, there — there was a sidewalk against, um, Livingston Road there, and they ended up widening that sidewalk to — to 10 foot width — Norm Trebilcock: — and, that kinda took care of that pathway aspect of things, so, they're trying to give access to folks who kinda go heading north and south, so... Wayne Arnold: Thank you, Norm. Norm Trebilcock: Mm-hmm. Wayne Arnold: Anybody else? Questions, comments? Everybody wanna go home? Female Speaker: Cocktail. Wayne Arnold: [Laughs] Well, if there are no other questions, I'm, uh, go ahead and adjourn the meeting. Thanks everybody for coming out. Male Speaker: Thanks. Female Speaker: Thank you, Wayne. [End of Audio] Duration: 19 minutes Page 10 of 10 Packet Pg. 1059 Grey Oaks DRI/PUD June 25, 2018 Neighborhood Information Meeting 9.C.6 c) M - A-1 xl- Packet Pg. 1060 r Project Team • Albert O'Donnell — O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner — Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • John C. English, P.E., Engineer — Barron Collier Companies, Peninsula Engineering 9.C.6 Packet Pg. 1061 Project Information 9.C.6 Existing Zoning: Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposed DRI/PUD amendment Request: Modify Master Plan to relocate two previously approved, unimproved, project access points from Golden Gate Parkway Airport Road, to Livingston Road. but and Packet Pg. 1062 'effrzm. 10 91 09 1w YX dir 1w YX Approved Map H OR GHN6:RAI. ti0'ifSS ® 11E1IDeNr1aL i7 xsrr.,� rsrrraxmvr aP:+a e� Q4Lp ✓•OVB9R .pPaomarr aH0 xfu. lORR+. vmmra ram PmuLmvlo r84c�1e� hi mo wm+are.rres ewuarr a" o can cumsoliae x� s {�T��[aa�xcsl u /u ouflNf- ( rOL=Zfcr mi0uom mr.otf oremvms mla�a'ui •3'9Q ➢i�aQYe� IIAY eew-1a uP ra• Ella 1[OF.iYrJY6,r [RII7$ f� C�8 wu� eaali Rm %ONeExl�f avaauPaNT TO TOK M c.nas L rl� MG a.9 = WO Num }aL LRif3ti m OAS ym""P (anxa�vaxleN +seas) ins n VmI I Dose Nar s2+rra. gm P PAee 444 QausEm : xlrc Tm 11NW WD �6HAYldraOq 1Gls6i al a[m mm OII1' Mat'" •[i0 MGM OPi a D 594Pe HOIIIiD Flet R.ImWIIaL ll;mm ONLT NC083rf OA mase DamumAy- I(Yalffi CaLlif'l'f'! ]72E$ZL? ACM mm ORICl%P17a1[. C41[Y�CLal. sou aoo��eacimamarso�a ra�/pmsr-oP-xar 1,2a8,aPl B.PA.LL 74.40 x arcrc.>a °`y��ii 71Yt s u llu:u a�18e8ra'ROH a.a1 sosraras sx4rav 1WEDUSM p ttO&M iClf'C 9e K,P -1 f ¢ M4 (mm LW7i as moo °a;am w 4wcP cae`ar-r�r IIfC kk 1la� Lai rlDl ('ONILRT1rImP 06.51 TML 1641.71 $fI11P N1'f4Tx Y�RfaRfaP! PAe9884l9 MAWS NLr1V� rl1iLL NM=5 lTaRl'YLiON N67raS10N 9Mlf714J0K SLP ! 66L.x ►.c. u7.1! a.c. Lar.aa a.c ..eeuu� 6z4.c6r>a brr�ws4a.ewl rlosr...,re.. ewnlee.awabwr. Irm ki NORTH 9.C.6 M Packet Pg. 1064 .VASg4�a f !� reP EaMOVE" ...:.:.:.:::...:. Par - (Pnl !Il'li4a PSCa'l!T[6r PSA�IHP33 -® sozu. rums sums vsesnnor aoEo>Ir Asa PscrrxsEor rspcunor 9xvm r � ML ft A.C. Ea7.M al. � • PM W ES 0!3 PGtEA3rvE� r E�91ERn�g3f PaWCFl. a-.—` 4s� o� � Packet Pg. 1065 vow Pa�PP Access Exhibit tOMAIEfL UIUMEMM Mp relocate access point 9.C.6 M MON _ proposed relocate L L 4 �'access point proposed relocated access paint C Q w a NOITM relocate access point Packet Pg. 1066 1 Proposed Access Locations Northern Access: Proposed right-in/right-out from the south bound lane of Livingston Road and a left -in from the north bound lane of Livingston Road Southern Access: right-in/right-out from the south bound lane of Livingston Road and no left -in from the north bound lane of Livingston Road WFITH 9.C.6 Packet Pg. 1067 Ordinance 2007-40, Section 4.02.A.6 4.02 PERMITTED USES ANO STRUCTURE No building or structure, or pert thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in wWe or in pert for other than the following'. A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1) Golf Course(s) 2) Tennis Club and facilities 3) Water management facllitles; essential services (in accordance with the LDC)- Lakes. including lakes with seawall and other types of archit-odurall hank treatment. 4) Open space recreational activities, ccmrnurio parks, and similar uses, including but not limited to shuftbooard courts. tennis courts, swimmirxq pools. boat docks and ramp. canoe launches, fishing piers. boat storage, beach gazebos, concession srands, health trails. bike paths and nature trails, observation platforms, boardwalks. playground, picnic areas and other types of facilities intended for ouldox recreakm, S} Cvmmurrity centerfclubhouse sj. 6) Skwage, maintenance yards. and landscaping nurseries within FP&L easements. rights-of-way. and open space. Subject to approvaN of the persons or entities In whose favor the easement or right-of-way runs. 7) Project Information and Sales Ceftter. 6) Any other use which is comparable in nature with the fcwe krg was and which the Eoard of Zoning Appeals or the City Community 0eveInpmant Director determines to to cornpatll le in the district. 9.C.6 Packet Pg. 1068 1 Questions? 9.C.6 a Packet Pg. 1069 9.C.7 Halstatt/Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) (PL20170001729) Application and Supporting Documents September 6, 2018 CCPC Hearing Prepared August 13, 2018 © GradyMinor C10 Finghecrs • Land Sumyors • 31aaners • Landscape Amhiwts Packet Pg. 1070 9.C.7 rn M V CD C O r R V .Q Q LL C N E t V cC Q r C d t V a Packet Pg. 1071 9.C.7 GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects October 20, 2017 Eric Johnson, AICP, RLA Principal Planner Zoning Services, Planning & Zoning Department Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Grey Oaks DRI — PL20170001729 Dear Mr. Johnson: On behalf of our client, O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc., we are submitting an application for an Amendment to a PUD for the above referenced project. The proposed amendment is being requested in order to modify Exhibit E and Map H-1 attached to Development Order Number 2000-04, Resolution Number 2000-190. The amendment proposes to shift two previously approved, but unimproved, project access points from Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, to Livingston Road. The two project access points shown on Map H have not been installed; however, they were intended to serve as access points to the Grey Oaks community. The two access points proposed to be shifted to Livingston Road are not intended for general access to the Grey Oaks community, but rather are intended for the sole use by the owner of approximately 32 acres adjacent to Livingston Road. This portion of the Grey Oaks PUD is encumbered by a Florida Power & Light (FPL) easement. An exhibit identifying the existing and proposed access locations is included with this submittal. We have submitted a letter to DEO requesting that they determine the proposed access modifications to qualify as a Chapter 380.06(19)(e)2.k change. If determined by DEO to be an (e)2.k change, an NOPC application is not required. A copy of this correspondence is included in this application. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Enclosures Cc: Al O'Donnell John English GradyMinor File Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 www.gradyminor.com Packet Pg. 1072 Cot[ii"er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR (check one): Chapter 3 D.1 of the Administrative Code F.S. § 380.06 and 380.0651 ❑ DRI Application for Development Approval (DRI) ❑ DRI Notice of Proposed Change (DOA) 0 Other DRI Development Order Amendment (DOA) PROJECT NUMBER To be completed by staff PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Applicant(s): Albert O'Donnell Firm: O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. Address: 4291 Williams Road Telephone: 239.572.1011 E -Mail Address: al@odo.land Agent(s) Firm: Q Cell: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP City: Estero Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey 9.C.7 State: FL ZIP: 33928 Fax: City: Bonita Springs State: FL ZIP: 34134 Telephone: 239.947.1144 Cell: Fax: E -Mail Address: warnoid@gradyminor.com DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No Please provide the following information on separate sheets and attach to the application: El 1. If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name beneficiaries. 2. If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders. 10 3. If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate and name principals. 2/4/2015 Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 1073 9.C.7 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 ❑ 4. If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, if any. ❑ 5. If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. �❑ 6. If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address. PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application, if space is inadequate, attach on separate page: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Property I.D. Number: 47790008537 & 47790038426 Section/Township/Range: 24925 Subdivision: Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen Tract E Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds Description: Size of Property: ft. X ft. = Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Gate Parkway Plat Book: 33 Page #: 63 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: West side of Livingston Road north of Golden If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: Not applicable Section/Township/Range: Subdivision: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 2/4/2015 Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 1074 9.C.7 CDfer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 DETAIL OF REQUEST 1. Does the proposed action comply with the Collier County Growth Management Plan? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No If no, provide a written explanation on a separate sheet, attached to the application. 2. Hasa public hearing been held on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑✓ No If yes, please provide a written explanation of the hearing on a separate sheet, attached to the application. 3. If this is a NOPC application, has any portion of the DRI been: ❑✓ SOLD and/or ❑✓ DEVELOPED? If yes, please provide a written explanation on a separate sheet, attached to the application. 4. On a separate sheet attached to the application, please provide a detailed narrative statement that explains the requested action and why this action is proposed. Provide applicable supporting material and a list of all previous actions on the subject site, beginning with the original DRI/PUD approval and including all subsequent amendments. Include hearing number, hearing dates and a summary of the approved action. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer at its expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. 2/4/2015 Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 1075 9.C.7 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ DRI Application for Development Approval (DRI) ❑ DRI Notice of Proposed Change (DOA) ❑✓ Other DRI Development Order Amendment (DOA) Chapter 3 D.1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittals items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) ❑ ❑ ❑ Project Narrative 3 ❑ ❑ Pre -application meeting notes ❑ ❑ ❑ Completed Addressing checklist (no older than 6 months) 2 ❑ ❑ Site Development Plan, 24" x 36" copy, 8 W' x 11" copy, and one jpg copy (from DRI Development Order) ❑ ❑ ❑ An 8 % in. x 11 in. graphic location map of the site ❑ ❑ ❑ DRI Development Order Master Plan ❑ ❑ ❑ Legal Description 2 ❑ ❑ List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 ❑ ❑ Survey signed & sealed 4 ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 2 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 3 ❑ ❑ Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys 2 ❑ ❑ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 5 ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) or waiver 5 ❑ ❑ Completed State NOPC Form with all attachments (if amendment) ❑ ❑ ❑ Completed State ADA Form with all attachments (if original DRI) ❑ ❑ ❑ Draft DRI Development Order to address proposed change ❑ Copies of Notices sent to DEO and RPC 2 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans 1 ❑ ❑ School Impact Analysis Application - residential projects only (download the School Impact Analysis Application from website) 2 ❑ ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement SCHOOL CONCURRENCY - If the proposed project includes a residential component, you are required to contact the School District of Collier County at 239-377-0267 to discuss school concurrency requirements. 2/4/2015 Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 1076 9.C.7 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Addressing: Annis Moxam ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet El Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ❑Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nicole Ryan ❑ Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad ❑ County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock El Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay ❑ Engineering: Alison Bradford ❑ Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky ❑ Other: ❑ Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months after the date of the last pre -app meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre -application meeting shall be required) :1 DRI Review (In addition to cost of rezone): $10,000.00 plus $25.00 per acre (or fraction thereof) o Additional fee for 5th and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee DRI/DO Amendment: $6,000.00 plus $25.00 per acre (or fraction thereof). The acreage charge does not apply for amendments which only change the build -out date of the DO for a time period of less than 5 years. o Additional fee for 5th and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee o Amendments deemed to be minor in nature, that is requiring minor strike thru and underline text amendments of no more than 10 different lines of text changes in the DRI, will be capped at $13,000.00. o Any amendment which includes a map and text change will assessed the full fee (no cap) DRI Extension: $100.00 :1 DRI Comprehensive Plan Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee: o CCPC: $925.00 o BCC: $500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review: $1,000.00 Property Owner Notifications: $1.50 Non -certified; $3.00 Certified return receipt mail (to be paid after receipt of invoice from the Zoning Services Department) :1 Transportation Fees, if required: o Methodology Review: $500.00 o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review: $1,500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if required: [reserved] o Mitigation Fees, if applicable, are to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Review: 2/4/2015 Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 1077 9.C.7 CDfer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net o DOA: $120.00 o DRI: $200.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 2/4/2015 Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 1078 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUDA Date and Time: Wed 5/10/2017 - 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM Assigned Planner: Eric Johnson Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Grey Oaks DRI/PUD PL #: PL20170001548 Property ID #: 47790000108 Current zoning: P_U9— Project Address: 2400 GREY OAKS DRIVE City: Naples Applicant: GradyMinor Agent Name: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Agent/Firm Address. 3800 Via Del Rey Property Owner: O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. Please provide the following, if applicable: L Total Acreage: 16.07 ii. iv. V. vi Proposed # of Residential Units: Proposed Commercial Square Footage: Mr UD State: FL Zip: 34105 Phone: 239-947-1144 City: Bonita Springs State: FL For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: Zip: 34134 If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the /� type and number: �� L�G 19 C P �; Z(iG a _ If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: c��D1,JINJCe 07- qu 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1079 Co*lr County 9.C.7 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# PL20170001548 (PUDA) Collier County Contact Information: Updated 4/26/2017 51 KI109 CfV,,, L ted v_)l i►\q �efi�iw�e� Page 1 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 1080 Name David Anthony Review Discipline Environmental Review Phone 252-2497 Email davidanthony@colliergov.net Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 StephenBaluch@colliergov.net J Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@colliergov.net J George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio@colliergov.net ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net ❑ Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-5740 Scottstone@colliergov.net ❑ Dale Fey North Collier Fire Safety dalefey@colliergov.net ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2434 ericfey@colliergov.net ❑ Impact Fee Administration Cl Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons@colliergov.net Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net Shar Hingson East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.org �I John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net . Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes@colliergov.net U Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net U Stephen Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net ,1, Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 paulomartins@colliergov.net Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net L_I Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net U Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net ❑ Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Impact Fees 252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net Michele Mosca, AICP Impact Fee Administration 252-2466 michelemosca@colliergov.net Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net LI Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheltree@colliergov.net ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@colliergov.net l _l Bill Pancake Laurie Beard ! North Collier Fire Safety PUD Monitoring 252-2310 252-5782 billpancake@colliergov.net lauriebeard@colliergov.net I Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net Updated 4/26/2017 51 KI109 CfV,,, L ted v_)l i►\q �efi�iw�e� Page 1 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 1080 Co*lr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net 7 Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Stormwater Plan Review 252-290 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net Richard Orth Stormwater Plan Review 252-5092 richardorth@colliergov.net jt*M C Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net Chris Scott, AICP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net Ll Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 petershawinsky@colliergov.net Eric Johnson, AICP, CFM Zoning Services 252-2931 ericjohnson@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 marktempleton@colliergov.net v/ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@colliergov.net Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen@colliergov.net Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net 7 David Weeks, AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5748 christinewilloughby@colliergov.net Camden Smith Zoning Services/ Operations Analyst 252-1042 camdensmith@colliergov.net 7 Patty Kulak Zoning Services / Planning Tech 252-1035 patriciakulak@colliergov.net John DeBlasiis Zoning Services /Planning Tech 252-1050 johndeblasis@colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email ICAA&L S Ptlp- Wt^/ 252-2s89 MKw�as,Eve+ ce�uEeso�.Ner p> n ANNE u, ow R, " 721du d C O L iv i IAJ Mm jt*M C PCAit LA eve e Updated 4/26/2017 Page 1 5 of 5 9.C.7 r- 0 0 r R a- a a LL CU Y Q r c m E t Y Y a Packet Pg. 1081 9.C.7 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net CORY County Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 Packet Pg. 1082 9.C.7 CoVer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 4/26/2017 Page 1 3 of 5 O m ,L^ V T) C6 N I- T_ O O O ti r O N J d CD Cl) t0 Packet Pg. 1083 [J Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coiliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes —r2 Q 7e- UJ -f- w - P,4 - /2/ -r c /0r-rP_sS -1200 e?"-etiT_i 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1084 Co ier County Growth Management Department Submittal Checklist for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. 1 REQUIREMENTS CODES REQUIRED REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary �/ I-1 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments Pre -application meeting notes ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist ❑ Warranty Deed(s) List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 4 ❑ 10, Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 4IT Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 5/ E ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. ❑ Traffic Impact Study -n-,> S ❑ Historical Survey ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents Checklist continued onto next page... 2/21/2017 Page 1 of 3 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1085 �� Completed Exhibits A -F (see below for additional information)' ❑ Conservancy ofSWFL:NicholeRyan SofIAiS��% ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %:" x 11" copy City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD fV 2/' I/ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet:: IIY Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code E� Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy ❑ Lockheart ❑ Conservancy ofSWFL:NicholeRyan SofIAiS��% Utilities Engineering: KrISVmT1Mfgerr— ERIC FeY ❑ Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: I ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 P/A Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre - application meeting): $2,500.00 ►SIA Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: Ems. L*DAR'tP_ pfj o Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00;�/,�,r f I Legal Advertising Fees: i VV��1� o CCPC: $1,225.00 P�e � J,i,C l o BCC: $500.00 � 1 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 2/21/2017 Page 2 of 3 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1086 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County *Additional fee for the 5"' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. All checks may be made payable to: Board of County Commissioners 2/21/2017 Page 3 of 3 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1087 1 mit" , »_ {�► � � i �. .` � � � � � .� . ' 440 14 4il t,,;a ;• f +s . . ............ , lop iJO i �'Joe, Virq PROPERT Ir �•A .I - A A ��.Ov ,j � I.. • J o o y� �S(E 0 o � �L•WUtl,,V�,�BC31 e D U.-@AAMC 2W.o N' ' oo ' o dfumlc�s(" l .1 1 1 305 0 610 Feet Co ler C;014nty Gmwth Management Department Zoning Division PL20170001548 (PUDA) PRE -APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Camden Smith John DeBlasiis STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-APPLICATOIN MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre -app request Sharon Umpenhour/ 239-947-1144 / sumpenhour@gradyminor.com • Agent to list for PL# Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., D. Wayne Arnold, AICP • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. • Confirm Purpose of Pre -App: (Rezone, etc.) Yes / No (list purpose if different) • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): Proposed amendment to the Grey Oaks PUD/DRI master plans in order to eliminate two access points on Golden Gate Pkwy and add two access locations on Livingston Road. These relocated access points will serve only the landscape nursery operations that are permitted within the Grey Oaks PUD. • PUD or PUD -A — is this a phased development and if so what schedule is being proposed? NO Supplemental Information provided by: Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician sumpenhour@gradyminor.com 239-947-1144 Created April 5, 2017 Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zor ing Division • 2800 Nath Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104.239-252-2400 • www.cdiagov.net 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1089 DeBlasiisJohn Subject: PL20170001548 (PUDA) Location: Conf Room C Start: Wed 5/10/2017 9:00 AM End: Wed S/10/2017 10:00 AM Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Accepted Organizer: CDS-C Required Attendees: Sharon Umpenhour; Acevedo Margarita; AhmadVicky; AlcornChris; Amy Lockhart -Taylor; AnthonyDavid; ArnoldMichelle; AshtonHeidi; AuclairClaudine; BaluchStephen; Beard Laurie; BeasleyRachel; BrownAraqueSummer; BrownCraig; CascioGeorge; CondominaDanny; CrotteauKathynell; CrowleyMichaelle; David Ogilvie; DeBlasiisJohn; dfey@northcollierfire.com; DumaisMike; FaulknerSue; FeyEric; FleishmanPaula; GarciaShirley; GewirtzStorm; GosselinLiz; GundlachNancy; HouldsworthJohn; HughesJodi; HumphriesAlicia; JacobLisa; jnageond@sfwmd.gov; KendallMarcia; KulakPatricia; KurtzGerald; LenbergerSteve; LevyMichael; Imartin@sfwmd.gov; LouviereGarrett; MartinezOscar; MastrobertoThomas; McCaughtryMary; McKennaJack; McKuenElly; McLeanMatthew; MoscaMichele; MoxamAnnis; NawrockiStefanie; OrthRichard; PajerCraig; Patricia Kulak@colliergov.net; PattersonAmy; PepinEmily; pjimenez@sfwmd.gov; PochmaraNatalie; ReischlFred; RodriguezWanda; RomanDaniel; RosenblumBrett; SantabarbaraGino; SawyerMichael; ScottChris; ShawinskyPeter; Shawn Hanson; SheaBarbara; SmithCamden; SmithDaniel; StoneScott; StrainMark; SuleckiAlexandra; SummersEllen; SweetChad; tamiscott; TempletonMark; VanLengenKris; VelascoJessica; WalshJonathan; WeeksDavid; Wickham Flannery; WilloughbyChristine; JohnsonEric Planner: Eric Johnson Fire District: Greater Naples ------------------------------------- 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1090 coir county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) Fol OTHER DRI/PUD Amendment LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) Grey Oaks DRI/PUD, S24, 25, 26/T49/R25 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) Grey Oaks DRI/PUD See Attached STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) See Attached • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Grey Oaks DRI/PUD PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (forexisting projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # PUD 89-6 DRI 89-1 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1091 Coer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Grey Oaks Please Return Approved Checklist By: 0 Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour Phone: Email/Fax: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number See Attached Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by �--�- Date: 5/1/2017 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1092 9.C.7 0 1.02 LEGAL DESCRIPTION o All that part of Section 24, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, N lying easterly of that 100 foot canal right-of-way as described in O. R. Book 154, page 6, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; N r 0 0 ALSOr O N J a All that part of Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, M lying easterly of that 100 foot canal right-of-way as described in O.R. Book 154, page 6, O.R. Book 873, page 1879 and O.R. Book 873, page 1882, all of the Public Records of .s Collier County, Florida; U_ LESS Golden Gate Parkway (C-886) as described in O.R. Book 465, page 275, and O. a R. Book 465, page 278, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; ALSO LESS those lands described in O.R. Book 194, page 603 and O.R. Book 640, E page 229, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, a r r a Packet Pg. 1093 9.C.7 ALSO N All that part of Section 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, o lying westerly of Airport -Pulling Road (C-31) and northerly of Golden Gate Parkway (C- o 886) located within the City of Naples; LESS that portion thereof as described in O.R. Book 539, page 370, Public Records of M Collier County, Florida; above property subject to easements and restrictions of record; containing 1,60 1.39 net acres more or less. .Q a LL E a zo Packet Pg. 1094 Grey Oaks DRI/PUD 9.C.7 N w * V S © GradyiMinor 2,300 1,150 0 2,300 Feet Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • PianneN • Landscape Architects Packet Pg. 1095 9.C.7 FLN NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 47790130065 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333003052 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 267120804 TRADITIONS GOLF RESIDENC AT GREY OAKS CONDO ASSN % SENTRY MGMT 7333000068 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333007061 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 7333008057 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333010061 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 53220001140 LA RESIDENCES AT GREY OAI LTD PARTNERSHIP 3200 BAILEY LN STE 117 53220002026 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS ( ASSN INC 22712000127 GREENMAN, KAREN M 2687 FIREBUSH LN 22712000143 MILLER, LINDA G 2683 FIREBUSH LN 22712001045 WAKELY, DAVID L=& JULIE E 155 BEDFORD PARK AVE 22712001401 EGGERICHS, JOAN K 4777 N GRANDVIEW DR 22712001029 MCCLOUD, MARK KAREN WILLIS 22712000664 MARGARET C FIOCCHI REV T 2618 TRILLIUM WAY 22712000949 UHLIG, RICHARD A=& JANET 2615 TWINFLOWER LN 22712000321 PEPE, MICHAEL=& LAURIE H 2663 CALADIUM WAY 22712001443 MARTIN J CROWE III TRUST 12547 AVILA LN 22712000525 HAGAN, GAIL C 2629 SORREL WAY 22712000648 WOOD, BARRIE R=& SUZANI` 2614 TRILLIUM WAY 22712001427 ANDERSON, VIRGINIA L=& G 5 RENAISSANCE SQ, UNIT 26E 22712001566 TILEY, BENJAMIN F=& ANGEI 2523 AVILA LN 22712000800 ROONEY III, ARTHUR J CHRISTINE B ROONEY 22712000363 DIAZ, JOHN R JULIE JAMIESON 22712000981 KELLY, PETER K=& BARBARA 2607 TWINFLOWER LN 22712000680 MARSHALL, EMYLIA 2173 SHAWANAGA TRAIL 22712001100 MENCKE, GEORGE M 2583 TWINFLOWER LN 22712001142 WESTPHAL, RAINER J 314 WINFIELD RD 22712000567 JOHNSTON, GEORGE G=& N) 2621 SORREL WAY 22712000509 KENNETH R GILMAN REV TRI 2633 SORREL WAY 22712001485 DANIEL H KRUSE REV TRUST 2539 AVILA LN RESORT MANAGEMENT 4604 ABERCORNE TER 2646 TRILLIUM WAY 2655 CALADIUM WAY 22712000787 BOROW, TONIA 2642 TRILLIUM WAY 22712001508 MCPARTLAND, JAMES F=& C 2535 AVILA LN 22712000305 THOMPSON III TR, JOHN M JOHN M THOMPSON III P/R/1 KAREN L THOMPSON TR 22712000703 SAWYER, HARRISON H PO BOX 7225 22712001524 KATHERINE A MABE 2014 TR 2750 COMMONS DR #304 22712001540 BARRY & TOSKA QUINNIES L 2527 AVILA LN 22712000729 MCGUIRE TR, MICHAEL MCGUIRE TR, SEAN THE CAMILLE MCGUIRE QPR 22712001168 LAMB -HEINZ TR, CATHERINE 437 SHERIDAN RD 22712000266 BURKE LIVING TRUST 2675 CALADIUM WAY 76925000960 MOORADIAN, FAIRLYN F 2071 TORINO WAY 22712000062 MARGARET J HURWICH 201( 1300 NORTH LAKE SHORE DR #32A 53220001182 BRODHUN, ANDREW R=& EL 2598 LERMITAGE LN 22712001087 SUSAN WELLS REYNOLDS TR 2587 TWINFLOWER LANE 7333009027 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 76925012327 JANE D SICHAU REV TRUST 2105 MODENA CT Packet Pg. 1096 77089000067 VILLAS OF TRADITIONS AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNERS A % SENTRY MGMT, INC 76925001008 THERESA L MISURACA REV T 2079 TORINO WAY 76925001082 CELANI, DANIEL J=& ANNE 2096 RIVOLI CT 76925001147 FRANK J HAGUE REV TRUST 7212 STILTON CT 76925001422 BENHAM, NEAL R=& JANE A 2125 MODENA CT 76925001448 MILLER, EDWARD 0=& JUNE 2121 MODENA CT 76925000986 LAURA L DIGGES REVOCABLE 2075 TORINO WAY 76925001406 CENTRACCHIO, NOREEN D 2575 RUE DU JARDIN #501 76925001066 JUDITH A ZOLLMANN REV TF 2092 RIVOLI CT 76925001765 CLARK II, JOHN B=& KATHRY 2157 ASTI CT 76925001749 BUTLER, JAMES B & JENNIFE 2161 ASTI CT 76925001383 FEINBERG, ELLIOT ROXANNE E PARKER 2126 MODENA CT 76925001668 SPIDALETTO LOSKILL, DOREE 2160 ASTI CT 76925001024 DOHERTY, EDWARD=& BARE 2083 TORINO WAY 76925001723 LYE, MARK R=& LISA J 16763 PRATO WAY 76925001163 TERRENCE J BACHNER REV T 2091 RIVOLI CT 76925001189 HAAG, JOYCE P 2087 RIVOLI CT 76925001367 DARLENE ELIZABETH DAGGE 500 S WATERLOO DR 76925001341 ROBERT A HERSHEY TRUST 2118 MODENA CT 22712000460 O'NEILL, NANCY NAPLES 2641 SORREL WAY 76925001105 D'APPOLONIA, MICHAEL R ELIZABETH F D'APPOLONIA 2100 RIVOLI CT 22712000389 IRONS, RICK=& SUSAN BOX 750 22712001362 DELP, JOHN K=& JANE M 157 COUNTRY CLUB DR 76925012408 SANDRA M STARK TRUST 2143 TORINO WAY 76925012385 MYERS, JONATHAN C=& MEI 2139 TORINO WAY 22712000088 TENNENT JR, ANDREW=& SL 2690 FIREBUSH LN 76925012107 MCLAUCHLAN, GABIJA LABA 2088 RIVOLI CT 76925012123 GEORGE, DAVID B ELAINE K CHAMBERS 2089 TORINO WAY 76925012165 KELLEHER, ANDREW J=& RH(2097 TORINO WAY 76925012149 WILLIAM S WELLS REV TRUS' MARY J WELLS REV TRUST 2093 TORINO WAY 7333009043 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS 76925005020 KING, JON M 22712000444 SEYMOUR, VIVECA S 76925012181 CCC TRADITIONS LLC PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 2164 ASTI CT 18 COUNTRY CLUB RD 2020 SALZEDO STREET 22712000965 CROTTY, JOHN T=& KAREN R 709 MOUNTAIN RD 76925012369 GILCHRIST, JAMES R=& GINA PO BOX 6476 76925012343 NELSON, T LANE=& CHERYL 12101 MODENA COURT 47790008029 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 22712000240 BOWERS, D STUART MARY V PERRY 53220002084 MARIAN R HAAG Q/P/R TRU 2650 LERMITAGE LN 53220001166 KESSLER, SUSAN V 4612 WIDGEON PATH 22712001003 KAMAREK, WILLIAM G=& L11' 2603 TWINFLOWER LN 76925001707 LYE, MARK R 16763 PRATO WAY 76925012440 SMYTHE, MARK A=& CARLA 819 YORK RD 53220002042 LA RESIDENCES AT GREY OAI PARTNERSHIP 53220002068 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS ( ASSN INC SUITE #200 3117 DAHLIA WAY 3200 BAILEY LN STE 117 RESORT MANAGEMENT 22712000282 R H JOSEPH JR REV LIV TRUS' MARILYN JOSEPH REV LIV TRl 109 SALEM AVE 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1097 76925012204 DONALD NEIL GISSLER TRUS- 2106 MODENA CT 76925012288 COMPALL JR, JOHN H CAROLINE E COMPALL 984 PINE TREE LN 76925012262 FRESE, THOMAS CHARU ANEJA 2117 MODENA CT 47790002708 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333008044 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 53220001289 BURCH, KIMBERLY G JOSHUS M D HALL III 7616 LHIRONDELLE CLUB RE 22712001469 MURRAY, JOHN K=& DIANE 12543 AVILA LN 76925001121 WILLIAM B WHITMAN FAM - 10 VILLAGE CENTER DR 76925012246 MCDONOUGH JR, JOSEPH J CYNTHIA A MCDONOUGH 2114 MODENA CT 76925012301 ZHANG, LU XIANGHONG HUA 201 FREEMAN ST #A 8 76925012424 JAKSICH, JEAN LYNETTE 5163 INAGUA WAY 22712000347 RUTER, HARRY E CYNTHIA R TOLLES-RUTER 2659 CALADIUM WAY 7333007045 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 77089000782 BERNSTEIN, ADAM H=& DAR 199 N AMHERST RD 47790022047 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333007029 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 77089000863 DAVIS, DAVID B=& CYNDE C 2273 RESIDENCE CIR 22712000101 2691 FIREBUSH LANE LLC 702 N BLACKHAWK AVE STE I 76925012220 KIMPS FAMILY LIVING TRUST PO BOX 10768 77089001040 ALTMAN, MARTIN S=& AKIK(2252 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 77089001066 JAMES G SULLIVAN TRUST REGINA ANN SULLIVAN TRUS 2248 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 77089000423 MCGILLIS, JOHN M=& LISA P 2195 RESIDENCE CIR 22712001346 MCGUIRE, BARBARA ERNEST J FIORE 2567 AVILA LN 77089000766 BRETT C OLEY LIV TRUST 2243 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001105 SHARON J FREEMAN REV TRS 2240 RESIDENCE CIR 53220002123 GIANNELLI TR, GERDA R GERDA R GIANNELLI TRUST UAD 10/21/05 53220002107 JUDY A VOET REVOCABLE TR 2654 LERMITAGE LN 77089001121 JOANN M REHAK TRUST 2236 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 7333008028 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 53220001221 SHUCART, JAMES=& MARY E 2606 LERMITAGE LN 47790027107 HAGANS, MATTHEW D 2242 SILVER PALM FL 77089001082 PESCHEL, ERROL C BARBARA SPEARING 2244 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001024 HUMMER, JAMES J=& KIMB12256 RESIDENCE CIR 53220001263 BURKE, ROBERT W=& DONN 2359 ALEXANDER PALM DR 22712000761 VANDE MOORE TRUST 2638 TRILLIUM WAY 22712000745 ROBERT P CADWELL REV TR(2634 TRILLIUM WAY 77089000805 SMALLA, FRANK H=& SABINE 98 LOCUST RD 22712000541 1331977 ALBERTA LIMITED 2700 CARLETON ST SW 77089001147 CHRISTOU, NICOLAS V KATERINA P CHRISTOU 405 SMALL ST 77089001163 BRAVERMAN FAMILY TRUST 2228 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 77089000504 LONDON, FREDERICK W SUSAN CORSETTI LONDON 2211 RESIDENCE CIR 76925012466 HOWELL, ROBERT A=& ELIZA 2153 ASTI COURT 77089001325 SCANCARELLA, JOHN=& KAR 2191 WASHINGTON VALLEY F 77089000481 BOTTE, MICHAEL D=& EILEEI 2207 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001309 MILTON HOTELS LTD REGISTERED CO OF SCOTLAN 8 NESS WALK 77089000847 ONEIL, PAUL R=& JUDITH A 2269 RESIDENCE CIR 47790099300 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS � 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1098 77089000708 BIRCH ET AL, CHARLES FREDI 11 TH AVE PARK LANE 77089000520 SOLAZZO, STEVEN CARL JUNE ANNELLA DECKER 2215 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001189 JEAN DEE GREENBERG REV T 2224 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001341 RYAN III, THOMAS N 2192 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001286 ROMANO, DAVID CAROLYN ROMANO 2204 RESIDENCE CIR 77089000821 DAVIS, VERNON J 2265 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 77089000465 SEMERE, PETER R=& SANCHI 2203 RESIDENCE CIR 22712001126 DAVIS, ANTHONY R=& MARN PO BOX 759 47790099287 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 77089001260 CLUB 2208 TRUST 2208 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 2235 RESIDENCE CIR 77089000449 LINDEMANN, JOHN A S YVONNE LINDEMANN 2199 RESIDENCE CIR 53220001247 BUFFINGTON, ALAN R KATHERINE E BUFFINGTON 2610 LERMITAGE LN 77089000546 ADELE M FAHEY REV TRUST 807 DEER TRAIL LN 7333009182 ROY, YVES 77089000562 JAMES A ISRAEL REV TRUST DEBORAH A ISRAEL REV TRUE 6705 AUGUSTINE CT 47790021103 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 77089000164 JANIE BRADY BROWN TRUST 2331 TRADITIONS CT 53220002149 KOHN, J DAVID=& JEANETTE 64 GOODNOUGH RD 77089000928 SCHMITZ, CHRISTOPHER P PAMELA R SCHMITZ 2285 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 77089000889 PRENTICE, ROBERT A=& VER 2277 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 22712001061 LAWRENCE S KLOCK REV TRI 2591 TWINFLOWER LN 76925012563 SANCHEZ, FAUSTINO F=& GI' 2136 TORINO WAY 77089001244 STAHLMAN, MARK S=& JOAP 2212 RESIDENCE CIR 77089000902 GOLDFARB, ARTHUR J=& JO) 24A BROADVIEW RD 76925012589 VASQUEZ, JOSE WENDY REGINA VASQUEZ 28 AUDUBON LN 77089000740 TYRRELL, KAY 2239 RESIDENCE CIR 53220001124 LA RESIDENCES AT GREY OAI LTD PARTNERSHIP 3200 BAILEY LN STE 117 77089000407 LAUREN D MAXWELL LIV TRI 2191 RESIDENCE CIR 77089000724 REGINA G HENNEY TRUST 2235 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001202 RIOS, FELIPE=& SHARON 2220 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 76925012602 SUKEFORTH, JAMES A SUSAN RENACCIO 2098 TORINO WAY 76925012628 JONATHAN TYNDALL FLOE TI 2092 TORINO WAY 7333009182 ROY, YVES SYLVIE FILION 1485 SHERBROOKE ST WEST 53220001205 1933 MONTANA AVE LLC 1267 DARTMOUTH CT 76925012644 MICHAEL & CHERYL ROE LIV 2086 TORINO WAY 77089000944 MONTES, LILLIAN 2289 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001228 DAVID J PAULDINE QPR TRU' MARIA C PAULDINE QPR TRU 804 S COLFAX AVE 76925012660 GREY OAKS TORINO 52 TRUE 2078 TORINO WAY 47790027123 MARY ANN BEATTIE TRUST 2238 SILVER PALM PL 76925012686 RIGSBEE, NED L=& PAMELA 2074 TORINO WAY 51999000021 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIC C/O RESORT MANAGMENT 7333009946 VARI, ANDRAS J=& CONSTAI` 148 HARBRIDGE MANOR 7333009920 WALLACE, HENRY D G=& IRA 1576 MARSH WREN LN 7333009904 V J & P A GIBLIN REV TRUST 1572 MARSH WREN LANE 7333009205 TOWNSEND, CHARLES=& BE' 16 CORBIN DR 47790026687 HUNTER, BETTY L 2326 SILVER PALM PL 77089001367 MARTIN, WILLIAM F=& JANE 2188 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 77089000588 JAMES A DONALDSON TRUS- 2233 ABERDEEN CT 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1099 22712001388 E N GILBARD 2002 FMLY TRL 2559 AVILA LN 47790022021 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 77089000326 HAMILL III, JAMES P=& PATR 2346 TRADITIONS CT 77089000960 PLETT NAPLES TRUST 43 BURNLEY PL 7333000042 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 77089000368 WILLIAM J SULZMANN TRUS 2336 TRADITIONS CT 7333009328 GAFFNEY, J MICHAEL=& BOIN 1549 MARSH WREN LANE 7333000026 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333009881 BINKOWSKI, CAROLE 1568 MARSH WREN LANE 22712000486 WILLE, GAIL ELIZABETH THEODORE MORGAN WILLIE J 2637 SORREL WAY 77089000986 BERTIL D NORDIN REV TRUS- 2297 RESIDENCE CIR 7333009344 L ALUISE FMLY DYNASTY TRL 1545 MARSH WREN LN 7333009865 BEATTY, RICHARD F 1564 MARSH WREN LN 7333009849 SELVA FAMILY TRUST 2716 LAKEWOOD PT 47790023046 FRY, DONALD C=& SHARYN F 3099 INDIGOBUSH WAY 7333009289 MANS, MICHAEL D=& PATRh 1561 MARSH WREN LN 7333009768 HOEL, RICHARD=& DOROTH` 1544 MARSH WREN LN 47790026700 EST TAX SHELTERED TRUST ANN K HUBLITZ 2322 SILVER PALM PL 7333009247 MARJORIE A SPRINGER REV - 1569 MARSH WREN LN 7333010045 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333010029 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790026865 1388981 ONTARIO ONC 10 OWEN BLVD 47790026881 M A & V L PERDZIAK REV TRI 2286 SILVER PALM PL 47790026849 REDA, SALVATORE W=& BAR 2294 SILVER PALM PL 7333009823 DISABATO, JENNIFER A 1556 MARSH WREN LN 47790026904 FLOYD, REBECCA A 2282 SILVER PALM PL 47790023143 SCHERMAN, DEBRA D=& DA13119 INDIGOBUSH WAY 7333009742 WINTER BREAK FL LAND TRL 1540 MARSH WREN LANE 47790026823 RAEDEL, JOHN R=& SHEILA K 2298 SILVER PALM PL 47790026807 HOWARD TR, DAVID P=& DE D P & D HOWARD REV TRUST UTD 9/8/00 7333007744 MANNING LIVING TRUST 1358 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333007126 SHOTELL, RICHARD G 45 MAIN ST 7333007168 FOX, GORDON 257 LYTTON BLVD 7333007760 MICHAEL S POLK TRUST 18273 JUSTICE WAY 7333007142 GOSSELIN JR, JOSEPH V DIANE Y GOSSELIN 7333007786 BRUCE, MICHAEL J=& BARBA 1364 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333009360 BAINUM, ROBERT EVERARD CHARMAINE CAW BAINUM 7333009263 AHEARN, GEORGE P=& MAR 1565 MARSH WREN LN 47790026920 MULLICAN, R WAYNE=& SUS 2278 SILVER PALM PL 7333007524 FLOYD, CHARLES E_& CHARL 20 PUTNAM ROAD 7333007582 MOORE, MALCOLM F 1326 NOBLE HERON WAY 77089000643 THOMAS K & RONDILYN C M4909 WYANDOTTE ST 7333007689 YOUNG, PETER=& KELLY F 1346 NOBLE HERON WAY 77089000669 FERGUSON, STEPHEN L=& C( 225 N WASHINGTON 7333007223 MITCHELL, JAMES=& MARGO 1380 GREAT EGRET TRAIL 7333007728 GIFFORD J WELLS TRUST 1354 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333007184 WEEDMAN, JEFFREY D=& Cl- 1355 NOBLE HERON WAY 8 BLUEBERRY BND 4320 FOREST HILL DR 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1100 7333007605 MICHAEL J HUBER REV TRUS 1330 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333007249 SMITH, ANDREW=& LESLEY 1343 NOBLE HERON WAY 77089000384 PINTO, FRANK A=& BONNIE. 2909 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790023062 JUDITH E FELIX REVOCABLE 13103 INDIGOBUSH WAY 77089000342 GARNETT, RICHARD E GABRIELLA N GARNETT 2342 TRADITIONS CT 47790023101 MICHAELIS, WOLF D SANDA, MARIE 3111 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790023088 HOGAN, LOIS E 3107 INDIGOBUSH WAY 7333009726 AUGHENBAUGH, JACK ELLEN F BORAN 1536 MARSH WREN LANE 7333007663 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 7333007304 SUCCOP II, LAWRENCE N 1331 NOBLE HERON WAY 47790026784 GRAHAM PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENTS LLC 1427 W 86TH ST STE 321 7333007621 H L CHILCUTT FL HOUSE TRU 1334 NOBLE HERON WAY 79840000547 SMITH, NICHOLAS V=& JEAN 1712 VENEZIA WAY 7333009221 WENK, JOSEPH R=& CAROL L 1573 MARSH WREN LN 7333009302 KEESHAN, LYNN 38 PARK AVE 7333009784 RING JR, JOHN H=& NORA E 1548 MARSH WREN LN 7333007265 M DOUGLAS DUNN QPR TRL 1339 NOBLE HERON WAY 47790026946 SCOTT, BEN C=& JACQUELIN 1952 FORT HARRODS DR 7333007281 C R WILMOT PERSONAL RES WILMOT, JAMES R=& CYNTH134 MUIRFIELD CT 7333009645 GRAY, PATRICK M=& PATRIC 1520 MARSH WREN LANE 7333007647 ROBERT BRUCE KERR TRUST 1047 SKYVALLEY CIRCLE 47790026726 MARBRY HOLDINGS LLC 1986 SEWARD AVE 47790027068 GATWARD, JOHN A=& SUSA12250 SILVER PALM PL 7333007320 SKINNER TR, C MICKEY PNC BANK NA TR JEAN M SKINNER REV TRUST 7333007388 JOE PREGONT REV TRUST TINA PREGONT REV TRUST #: PO BOX 471 7333009386 CORWIN, PHILIP=& JANE LEU 5151 ROCKLEDGE DR 79840000084 SHOAF, MARGERY W 1709 VENEZIA WAY 7333007809 BRUNO, THEODORE J=& DIA 1368 NOBLE HERON WAY 79840000301 OVERSTALL, ANN D LONGACRE CHESTNUT AVE ST GEORGES HILL 7333007207 CATTLIFF, ROGER=& ROSEM,1351 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333007702 CHRISTOPHER J LAPAN LIV TI J J RODRIGUEZ-VILLALOBOS L 1350 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333007566 THOMAS E ROBINSON REV T ELIZABETH F ROBINSON REV - 21 W HUGHES ST 7333009661 FISHER, BARRY M=& CHERYL 1524 MARSH WREN LANE 79840000327 PIRNAK, LARRY 1727 VENEZIA WAY 7333009700 THOMAS J ITRICH DECL OF T DONNA LEE ITRICH DECL OF 11532 MARSH WREN LANE 79840000343 WALKER, DONNIE W=& MAF 1731 VENEZIA WAY 7333009441 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 7333009629 WOLFGRUBER, KURT 59 BOYESEN RD 7333007508 DARDANI, THOMAS E_& DOI 1310 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333009409 AIELLI, FABRIZIO=& INGRID k 1533 MARSH WREN LN 7333007100 HAWN JR, GEORGE S=& HELI 1369 NOBLE HERON WAY 77089000685 COLEMAN, ELAINE J 2234 ABERDEEN COURT 7333007346 STOLZE, JAMES M=& PATTIE 1323 NOBLE HERON WAY 79840000466 FALSO, ADOLPH V=& BARBA 1730 VENEZIA WAY 25340000185 KANE, MICHAEL P=& KATHLE 2825 CAPISTRANO WAY 53220001027 LA RESIDENCES AT GREY OAf LTD PARTNERSHIP 76925000481 CATHERINE G MCKAY REV TF 2216 MIRAMONTE CT 3200 BAILEY LN STE 117 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1101 7333009467 LEMON INVESTMENTS LLC 2338 IMMOKALEE RD #324 79840000246 RUNG, CRAIG M=& NANETTE 1750 VENEZIA CT 47790023567 WEBER, STEVEN H=& NANCti48 HEMLOCK PARK DR 7333007540 KIEHI, WILLIAM J=& SHARON 1318 NOBLE HERON WAY 79840000288 HAGERMAN, MARK F 510 W WASHINGTON BLVD 79840000068 ANDERSON TR, JEFFREY R JEFFREY R ANDERSON LIV/TR UTD 10/8/96 76925000384 NAVIKAS, DAVID=& MARIE 2221 MIRAMONTE CT 7333007362 HOWARD G STACKER REV TF % FREDRIKSON & BYRON 1319 NOBLE HERON WAY 47790026962 FORBES, GENE M=& PATTY L PO BOX 1826 76925000902 JENKINS, WILLIAM A=& MAP 2199 MIRAMONTE WAY 79840000563 RITTER, MICHAEL C=& SUSAI PO BOX 1336 76925000407 KAREN J CORSO REV TRUST 1439 HARVEST CROSSING DR 47790023486 WOOD, WENDY SILLS 3254 SEDGE PL 76925000368 GARY LEE BLAIR REV TRUST SHEILA KAYE BLAIR REV TRUS 2225 MIRAMONTE CT 47790023127 FASOLD, PATRICIA 65 STARBOARD REACH 76925000889 HIGHTOWER, JAMES ALAN CHERYL WHITE HIGHTOWER 19 HIALEAH DRIVE 25340000169 LISTON, BRIAN=& VASILIKI 144 HILLCREST AVE 47790023460 EMILIE W MCCABE REV TRU.3250 SEDGE PL 76925000928 OPP LTD 2203 MIRAMONTE WAY 7333009483 LEHMKUHL, LARRY=& DARLE 1517 MARSH WREN LANE 7333003049 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333007401 MCNICHOLAS, JOHN T=& NA 1311 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333007485 STEVEN ROSENTHAL QPR TR CYNTHIA J ROSENTHAL QPR T 1306 NOBLE HERON WAY 79840000042 DONOGHUE, MICHAEL A=& 11701 VENEZIA WAY 47790026742 STRIANO, ROBERT E_& JANE 22 DEER RIDGE TRL 7333009807 TARANO, MANUEL=& EDDIS 97 PINE HILL RD 76925000067 MIRAMONTE AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 76925000300 MAHONEY, MICHAEL J CHRISTINE F MAHONEY 1101 LOCUST ST # 11 E 76925000326 SILVERSTEIN, MARTIN B ANDREE A HAAS 61 PROSPECT AVE 7333009425 LANZ TR, LISA KEARNS GERALD R LANZ TR LISA KEARNS LANZ TRUST 47790027084 KYLE, JOHN F=& JUDITH A 2246 SILVER PALM PL 7333009687 LORD, ALBERT L=& SUZANNE 1528 MARSH WREN LANE 76925000546 KETTLER, GORDON W=& FR/ 2228 MIRAMONTE CT 25340000208 NICHOLAS, ANTONIOS=& PA 2829 CAPISTRANO WAY 51999000348 BLEMASTER, GARY F=& JANE 2048 ISLA VISTA LN 7333009564 ANDERSON, ROBERT L=& JO, 1504 MARSH WREN LANE 25340000101 JUDY EST, LEONARD P % NICOLETTE H JUDY PR 2809 CAPISTRANO WAY 47790015106 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333007427 LE GRANDE, DOUGLAS R=& 11307 NOBLE HERON WAY 76925000342 SMITHPORT TRUST 1 LEWES CRESCENT 25340000282 FERRARI, RICHARD A=& SAN 2845 CAPISTRANO WAY 76925000504 FUREY, TIMOTHY R=& ELIZAI 28307 MALLARD DR 77089000203 BLACK, GREGORY S=& LINDA 2339 TRADITIONS CT 76925000520 SEGHI, ALBERT B=& SHARON 2224 MIRAMONTE CT 77089000180 PAWLOWSKI BONITA BAY TP 2335 TRADITIONS CT 7333009506 STAMOS, JAMES A=& MARTI 1513 MARSH WREN LN 25340000127 GOLDIN, RALPH S=& TINA C 2813 CAPISTRANO WAY 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1102 9.C.7 79840000521 BONCOSKY ET AL, DAVID 5245 N NEW JERSEY ST 25340000143 RYDER, DAVID ROSS JAN HARTLEY RYDER 2817 CAPISTRANO WAY 76925000601 FRISICARO, ANTHONY J DIANE S FRISICARO 42 BECKFORD CT 47790023509 SAUER, BRADLEY T=& NANC` 3258 SEDGE PLACE 79840000149 GANTOS, DAVID T 1751 VENEZIA CT 76925000944 JOHN P PEARL REV TRUST 600 E HIGH POINT RD 77089000245 JANIEL L DAYTON REV LIV TR 2347 TRADITION CT 7333003023 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790023347 MICHAEL FITZPATRICK INVT 4 KRAFTWOOD PL RR#1 47790028520 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY Sl 47790023363 COLLINS, JOANNE C 1380 SPRINGTON LN 7333007443 JOYCE, ROBERT J=& BONNIE 1303 NOBLE HERON WAY 47790023444 MOWATT, THOMAS A=& DIS 3246 SEDGE PL 47790026768 SAN TIVA II LP 130 BLOOR STREET WEST STE 905 7333007469 WRIGHT, IAN M=& SHARON 915 FEARRINGTON POST 25340000266 WAYLAND JR, JAMES JACKSC RENAE FUTNELL WAYLAND 2841 CAPISTRANO WAY 77089000229 NIES REVOCABLE TRUST 2343 TRADITIONS CT 76925000287 STEEL, IAN R=& TERRINA THE RIDINGS 27 TONGDEAN AVENUE 25340000088 TARANTINO, RONALD M LEIGH ANNE TARANTINO 2805 CAPISTRANO WAY 47790026988 SWAIN, CLARE L 2266 SILVER PALM PL 47790027042 WHEELER, ROBERT J=& SALL 2254 SILVER PALM PL 7333009522 NORMAN, WILLIAM P 1509 MARSH WREN LN 76925000465 FRANZ, WILLIAM G=& LORA 2212 MIRAMONTE CT 76925012547 HEFFNER, CAROLYNE 2142 TORINO WAY 77089000627 REILLY, EDWARD T 9 STONT PT 25340000305 YOUNG, ROBERT D=& KAREf 2849 CAPISTRANO WAY 79840000220 FREDRICKSON, BRUCE E_& K 1754 VENEZIA CT 47790027026 LENNON TR, ROBERT R ROBERT R LENNON TRUST 8832 SILVER OAK COVE 76925000588 M WERCHEK LLC 2202 MIRAMONTE WAY 77089000601 R MULHOLLAND REV LIV TRL C MULHOLLAND REV LIV TRU PO BOX 24 76925000261 NOLTE, JAMES E_& LAURA S 2245 MIRAMONTE CT 76925000245 MARTINEZ, LUIS FABIO LUIS FRANCISCO MARTINEZ FABIO HUGO MARTINEZ 76925000423 KANTOR, STANLEY WOLFE=82213 MIRAMONTE CT 7333009603 GENUARDI, JAMES V=& DEBI 1509 LATCHSTRING LN 51999000322 OLIVER, DIJANA 56 KENSINGTON AVENUE 76925000562 SHUCART, JAMES CHRISTOPI ROCHELLE C SHUCART 2232 MIRAMONTE CT 25340000240 JOHNS, DAVID L=& CHRISTIN4772 SHIRE RIDGE RD E 76925000627 CASA DE NAPLES LLC 9000 CONGRESSIONAL PKWY 25340000321 MARINO, JOSEPH W MARGUERITE M MARINO 2853 CAPISTRANO WAY 77089000261 E J & C F BARRETT FAMILY TF 2351 TRADITIONS CT 76925000449 DAVID W POWELL FAMILY TI 2209 MIRAMONTE CT 79840000440 DECKER, JOSEPH C=& NANN12980 DEVONSHIRE RD 79840000369 BIRNHAK, SHELDON E ROBIN S BIRNHAK 1735 VENEZIA WAY 79840000482 VANDEMARK, DIRK A=& PHY 118 ROXBURY PARK 47790023428 J DAVID HUBER REV TRUST BARBARA L HUBER REV TRUS 3242 SEDGE PL 77089000287 KRUPP, LESTER F=& PATRICK 2355 TRADITIONS CT 47790023389 HARRILL, S MICHAEL JENNIFER A KAHN 3234 SEDGE PLACE Packet Pg. 1103 79840000505 HARRINGTON, RICHARD J=& 1720 VENEZIA WAY 47790023525 BLUM, DAVID=& JANET 2292 DRURY LANE 47790023583 YON, MICHAEL M MARY A YON 3274 SEDGE PL 7333009580 LEACH, JERRY B=& ELEANOR 1508 MARSH WREN LN 51999000144 MANGAN, MICHAEL D=& KIIN 2041 ISLA VISTA LN 76925000740 PAMELA F CLAYSON REV TRL 2170 MIRAMONTE WAY 47790027000 GARRAND, ROBERT W=& DE 2262 SILVER PALM PL 47790023541 FLASKA, MARTIN J=& ELISSA 3266 SEDGE PL 79840000204 FOX, THOMAS H=& CLAIRE A 1758 VENEZIA CT 79840000181 MARTINI, DAWN M 1759 VENEZIA CT 79840000424 JOHN G GONIS 1979 TRUST 1738 VENEZIA WAY 79840000408 BURKE, ROBERT E_& TERESA 2 OREGON HOLLOW 79840000385 3944719 CANADA INC 1739 VENEZIA WAY 51999000364 RABINOWITZ, JACK Z=& ANN 23 AUDUBON LN 25340000389 KENNEY, WILLIAM J=& DIAN 315 BALTUSTROL CIR 47790023402 RATTNER TR, KENNETH L REBECCA RATTNER TR 76925007028 SMART, DUNCAN N=& AMAITHE ELMS 51999000542 MICHETTI TR, MICHAEL L LAUREN T MICHETTI TR 79840000165 HANNSZ, JOHN E_& JANICE E 1755 VENEZIA CT 76925007044 PARRINI, DANTE C=& BREND 1410 BRITTANY DR 47790028546 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 79840000262 WALLING, STEPHEN J 1746 VENEZIA CT 25340000460 NAVARRE, ROBERT W=& BAI 2816 CAPISTRANO WAY 25340000347 COSTELLO, CHARLES W=& C) 2857 CAPISTRANO WAY 51999000306 WILLIAM W SNYDER REV LIV 100 S BRENTWOOD BLVD STE 51999000487 MINUTELLA JR TR, JOHN A JOANNE FLORIA TR 77089000300 RAVITZ, ROBERT A MURIEL RAVITZ 77089001383 FERGUSON, MATTHEW W=81013 KETTERING PL 47790023305 SCHLESINGER, SAMUEL B ARLENE M SCHLESINGER 47790023282 RIZZI, EDYCE B=& JOHN L 105 PLATINUM PL 79840000123 CADIEUX, MARY MARTIN 1747 VENEZIA CT 25340000444 MEYER, ROBERT L=& EFFIE J 2822 CAPISTRANO WAY 47790023266 LINDA GOSS REV TRUST 28121 OAKLANDS CIR 7333009548 GUY W LEWIS REV TRUST 1505 MARSH WREN LN 51999000461 TARNOW, DENNIS P=& KARE 2024 ISLA VISTA LN 76925000643 SIEGEL, NORBERT K 2190 MIRAMONTE WAY 51999000160 GROSS, JOSEPH S=& URSULA 5 PARK PL APT 719 79840000107 URREA, OSCAR=& DIANA 4270 MUIRFIELD CIR 7333008141 PHILP, IAN IRIS PHILP 7333008167 SARDAR, ZAHEER M=& KARY 690 S RIDGE RD K L & R R RATTNER REV TRU. BACON END MICHAEL L MICHETTI REV TE ARTICLE FOUR RESIDUAL TR 2350 TRADITIONS CT 3218 SEDGE PL 1474 ANHINGA PT 7333008109 LB ESTUARY LLC 2210 VANDERBILT BEACH RD STE 1300 7333008125 KLEIN, ANSGAR=& MONIKA IN DER REHWIESE 3 77089001008 BLOOMFIELD, ALAN F=& NAI 2260 RESIDENCE CIR 7333008183 LEJEUNE, LAURENCE F=& JE/ 630 LOCUST HILLS DR 76925000724 PETER & LEE BEWLEY REV TF 2174 MIRAMONTE WAY 51999000186 DESPAIN TR, GLORIA A=& JA GLORIA A DESPAIN DECL OF 1 UTD 11/24/99 76925000863 TILSON, SHAWN TOWNLEY DALE ANN TILSON 4012 LANTERN LN 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1104 25340000224 PESTILLO, PETER DEBRA SCHINDLER 2833 CAPISTRANO WAY 7333008086 HOWARD L CHILCUTT TRUST 1334 NOBLE HERON WAY 76925007060 UHLIG, RICHARD ALLEN JANET LEE UHLIG 2146 TORINO WAY 51999000500 WAGGONER, FRANK M 2016 ISLA VISTA LN 47790023321 NOLAN, JAMES P=& MARGA 3222 SEDGE PL 47790023169 BOYD, LOUIS J=& PAMELA A 3123 INDIGOBUSH WAY 7333008280 LORI S FERNANDES REV TRU' RICHARD J FERNANDES REV T 1465 ANHINGA PT 7333008303 RANDAL E GOLDEN REV TRU 19800 W 8 MILE RD 7333008361 WENDY R WILSON REV TRUS 1481 ANHINGA PT 7333008329 LB ESTUARY LLC 2210 VANDERBILT BEACH RD STE 1300 7333008345 DANTUS, STEVEN M=& SUSP 1477 ANHINGA PT 51999000283 OWENS, BRIAN J=& SHARON 2060 ISLA VISTA LN 77089000083 VILLAS OF TRADITIONS AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNERS.4 % SENTRY MGMT, INC 76925000782 BETTE E BILTON REV TRUST 72 BRINKER RD 7333008387 ELAINE M WILLIAMS TRUST 1485 ANHINGA PT 51999000128 HANSON TR, MELANIE J MELANIE J HANSON REV/TR UTD 1/11/01 7333008264 TRIPP TR, RAYMOND D LINDA M TRIPP TR R D & L M TRIPP REV TRUST 76925000847 GLEBA, PAUL F=& BEVERLY 2187 MIRAMONTE WAY 47790028229 PETRETTA, ANTHONY L=& Al' 1618 CHINABERRY WAY 47790028245 HORN BUCKLE, MERTROE B DONNA T HORNBUCKLE 1614 CHINABERRY WAY 47790028203 EDWARDS, WILLIAM H PATRICIA C EDWARDS 1622 CHINABERRY WAY 51999000526 MARK E FIEBRINK REV TRUS- 2012 ISLA VISTA LN 25340000363 REYNOLDS, ROYCE=& JANE � 2702 LAKE FOREST DR 47790026205 BURKE, ROBERT W=& DONN 2359 ALEXANDER PALM DR 47790026124 SUSAN E SWOPE TRUST %THE GLENVIEW TRUST CO 4969 US HWY 42, STE 2000 47790027783 BATES, EUN-HEE 1613 CHINABERRY WAY 47790027767 1609 CHINABERRY WAY LLC % GWEN BAUER 5701 HARBOUR RIDGE RD 47790027806 TEHAN, JOHN B=& REGINA,4 85 BROMPTON RD 47790026182 MARGARET T CARRICK RES T P 0 BOX 468 47790026425 HICKS JR, GEORGE L=& SUSA 2362 ALEXANDER PALM DR 47790026140 FRUSCELLA, FRED A=& BARB 5750 LIBERTY RD 47790027822 CAVALUZZI, CAROL A 1621 CHINABERRY WAY 51999000380 BORON TR, GREGORY F SUZANNE M BORON TR GREGORY F BORON QPR TRI 47790026221 CYNTHIA K HENNING REV TR 2355 ALEXANDER PALM DR 47790026263 PRICE, GERALD VINCENT BARBARA LYNN PRICE 57 WATERLOO ST 51999000429 CLARK, CAROL S 2032 ISLA VISTA LN 47790028148 STEPHEN ST ANGELO JR TRU 1636 CHINABERRY WAY 7333008206 ANHINGA POINTE LAND TRU 1460 ANHINGA PT 47790028261 WRIGHT, ROBERT A & CATHI 1610 CHINABERRY WAY 47790026289 CAROL M BOOSE TRUST 4N657 HIDDEN OAKS RD 47790099685 GRANGER, STEPHEN J=& CYP 1903 COCOPLUM WAY 47790026166 SHAFFER, BYRON=& SALLY A 2367 ALEXANDER PALM DR 47790026247 A J INNAMARATO REV LIV TF 2351 ALEXANDER PALM DR 47790026441 LYNGAAS, JOHN V LINDA C NOEL 76925000708 DANIEL H SHAPIRA FAM TRU 80 WOODLAND RD 47790027848 MAGRATH, TERRENCE B PATRICE MCKENNEY 7333008222 DIEMER TRUST 10380 TECUMSEH RD EAST 2366 ALEXANDER PALM DR 1625 CHINABERRY WAY 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1105 47790028180 WILLIAMS JR, VAN ZANDT WILLIAMS, MYRA N 1626 CHINABERRY WAY 7333008248 MANCHEN, CRAIG=& DONN) 1457 ANHINGA PT 47790099669 E F & S V LOGGHE TRUST 1907 COCOPLUM WAY 25340000402 OLSEN, THOMAS G BOOSALIS, MARY H 524 WALNUT SPRINGS DR 47790026409 MORLEY, LINDA W 2358 ALEXANDER PALM DR 76925000766 BARBARA M KENTY TRUST 8420 WEMBLEY CT 47790027149 BOYSON, ROBERT W=& PRU 2234 SILVER PALM PL 47790028164 WILLIAMS, DAVID J=& MARY 1632 CHINABERRY WAY 51999000267 WHITTEMORE, JOHN A=& C/ 2064 ISLA VISTA LANE 51999000445 BAYER TR, CAROL C=& RONA CAROL C BAYER REV TRUST/2 UTD 4/12/06 47790023240 CARMEN L GRIGSBY TRUST 3206 SEDGE PL 25340000486 MRS REVOCABLE TRUST 2810 CAPISTRANO WAY 47790023208 STROM, SUSAN LEE 34 HICKORY MEADOW RD 47790099481 BOBROW, RICHARD S 1928 COCOPLUM WAY 51999000403 CYNTHIA SCOTT REVOCABLE 18650 BEARPATH TRAIL 76925000669 MEDOL LLC 2186 MIRAMONTE WAY 47790026548 LONG, DAVID J=& JUDITH T 2390 KING PALM WAY 47790026483 MENEFEE, EDWARD=& SHIRI 2378 KING PALM WAY 47790026506 DAVID J PARSONS REV TRUS" 2382 KING PALM WAY 76925000685 KRONE, ANDREW J=& BARB/ 2182 MIRAMONTE WAY 47790026302 RICK, THOMAS W=& LINDA P 2339 ALEXANDER PALM DR 47790099342 G E RICHMOND 2006 IRREV - % AL BRENNAN TR 737 N MICHIGAN AVE 76925000821 TILSON 2012 FAMILY TRUST 46 PARK LANE CIR 76925000805 RANKIN, MARK A=& MAURE 2179 MIRAMONTE WAY 47790027864 POUND, LEO=& SONJA 1629 CHINABERRY WAY 51999000102 L W MONTANARO 2014 IRRE 2033 ISLA VISTA LANE 47790001602 CUSICK, THOMAS A 2633 BULRUSH LANE 47790001709 ALEXANDER, DON H=& CHRI 2642 BULRUSH LN 47790001589 SHARON MOON REVOCABLE 26 WOODLAWN AVE 47790022429 SPINELLI, WILLIAM 2948 BELLFLOWER LN 47790022487 RECHTER, RICHARD P MARILYN RECHTER 2936 BELLFLOWER LN 47790022461 BOYD, BRETJ=& URSULA 2940 BELLFLOWER LN 47790017201 ARTHUR H BUNN TRUST BOX 4465 47790017256 STANHOPE, JOHN E_& MARI 2820 TARFLOWER WAY 47790099504 FUGA FAMILY TRUST 7 FAIRFIELD PLACE 47790001107 JOHN J HENNESSEY IRREV TR AUDREY T HENNESSEY QPR T 2500 SPICEBUSH LN 47790015355 HUTCHINSON, PHILLIP M=& 29 WHITTLES WAY 47790001123 MCBRIDE, GERALD=& TARYN 2504 SPICEBUSH LN 47790001149 KAPOR TR, LEO CORINNE KAPOR TR CORINNE KAPOR REV TRUST 47790015504 TEPAS, THOMAS G=& DEBRA 2720 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790001165 COHEN TR, JANET G 2512 SPICEBUSH LN 51999000209 FROSCHLE, CHARLES=& JOAP 2055 ISLA VISTA LN 47790001864 GRANGER, THOMAS D=& ELI 2610 BULRUSH LANE 47790026522 J R & J M POLLOCK REV TRU! 2386 KING PALM WAY 47790016804 BONTEMS TR, KATHLEEN T KATHLEEN T BONTEMS TRUS- 2814 THISTLE WAY 47790001547 STEVEN B SILL REVOCABLE T 9150 PILLSBURY AVE S 47790022607 SCOTT A SMITH LIVING TRUE 2912 INDIGOBUSH WAY 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1106 9.C.7 47790000823 TREVELONI, CATHERINE D 2410 CHICORY LN 47790001000 LANDIS, HOWARD C 72 LOGAN RD 47790001725 BARTLETT, MARK S=& KAREP 2638 BULRUSH LN 47790016354 JOHNSON II, GRAYSEN P PERSEPHONE S JOHNSON 2709 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790022500 2932 BELLFLOWER LANE REALTY TRUST 82 BACON ST 47790099520 WHITE, DAVID R=& JOANNE 1936 COCOPLUM WAY 47790001026 JOHN GILBERT COX LIVING T 559 CONCORD RD 51999000568 STANANOUGHT, COLIN LESLIE JANE STANANOUGHT 2004 ISLA VISTA LANE 47790028041 PATRICIA LEIPZIG REV TRUST 1645 CHINABERRY WAY 47790015559 OLEJAR, THOMAS M=& PATF 2724 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790022306 HAYS TR, BRENDA S BRENDA S HAYS REV TRUST 47790001505 FLAGG, MARTHA WARD FLAT CLINTON DAGGETT FLAGG 47790027903 MOMTAZEE, SAM 1654 CHINABERRY CT 47790001482 SCOTT, MARILYN 602-8 SULTAN ST 47790001466 JACQUELINE H MARTIN REV 2509 SPICEBUSH LN 47790022445 VAN GELDEREN, LOUIS=& JA 7 SOUTH 459 DONWOOD DR 47790001343 2094043 ONTARIO INC 10 WEYBOURNE CRESCENT 47790001369 BLOKSMA, HENDRIK F=& ELF 2529 DAY LILY PL 47790001563 CARP, LINDA N 2625 BULRUSH LN 47790021200 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790001042 ANAPOL, MICHAEL 1=& MER' 2423 INDIAN PIPE WAY 47790026344 HELDRETH, DOUGLAS D=& R 6676 STONEGATE DRIVE 47790001068 REBECCA S MARTELL TRUST 2419 INDIAN PIPE WAY 47790016309 PAWLOWSKI BONITA BAY TF 2812 TARFLOWER WAY 47790026328 AIN, ARON=& SUSAN 255 FULLER ST 47790016257 ALLEN, CHARLENE A 2717 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790028928 MILLER, PAUL DAVID=& M R 3118 DAHLIA WAY 47790028902 COGGINS FAMILY LLC 1220 BRENTFORD LN 47790021543 JOSEPH A MARX TRUST 2823 SILVERLEAF LN 47790000849 SMITH, ARTHUR L=& LOLA L 2414 CHICORY LN 47790022623 LIPITZ, FLORA E 2908 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790001741 STOCK, MICHAEL A=& HEIDI 2634 BULRUSH LN 47790028025 DUPREEZ, HUGO D=& ELIZAF 1641 CHINABERRY WAY 47790015452 SHORT JR, H DREXEL LAURA MILLER -SHORT 47790017052 WATZINGER, GERHARD A=& 2821 TARFLOWER WAY 47790160048 SPROUL, KATHERINE G 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 2943 BELLFLOWER LN 2501 SPICEBUSH LN 2716 BUCKTHORN WAY 77089000041 VILLAS OF TRADITIONS AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNERS A % SENTRY MGMT, INC 47790015407 LIPPERT, L DOUGLAS=& MAF 2712 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790027945 RILEY, CHRISTOPHER, M=& N 1659 CHINABERRY CT 47790029008 HOGAN, PATRICK J=& PATRI(3102 DAHLIA WAY 47790160420 FRANCES W LETHAM TRUST 2108 CANNA WAY 51999000241 EDELMANN, ANDREW P PATRICIA B EDELMANN 2063 ISLA VISTA LN 47790038989 BERTHA M HUFF TRUST 10 CAMBRIDGE DR 47790016202 SUSAN K SLOAN REV TRUST 2721 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790001806 SCHOEWE FAMILY TRUST KAREN K SCHOEWE REV TRU! 2622 BULRUSH LN 47790028083 FINIZIO TR, TOBIN A=& JANI(TOBIN A FINIZIO REV TRUST JANICE M FINIZIO REV TRUS- 47790160080 DIERMEIER, JEFFREY J DIERMEIER, JULIA M 2113 CANNA WAY Packet Pg. 1107 47790016901 JONES, DONALD T=& PHYLLI: 2809 TARFLOWER WAY 47790001385 TOMAINI, SANTO=& LISA M 2525 DAY LILY PL 47790015300 DICERBO II, LOUIS P=& EILEE 33 CHAPEL ROAD 47790001440 L DICK BUELL TRUST 2513 SPICEBUSH LN 47790028106 FALTER, JACALYN 1644 CHINABERRY WAY 47790039001 MANGAN, MICHAEL D=& KII� 2041 ISLA VISTA LANE 47790021763 FARR TR, WILLIAM JOYCE ANN FARR TR FARR FMLY LAND TRUST 47790099643 CHARLES S WOLANDE REV TI 1911 COCOPLUM WAY 47790001767 KWON, DOUGLAS S=& SUSA17 OLD FARMS RD 47790015601 SUZANNE PALONE TRUST 2728 BUCKTHORN WAY 25340000428 DAVID R FRAUENSHUH REV - 7101 W 78TH ST STE 100 47790160064 EITEL, CHARLES ROY CYNTHIA MCDOUGAL EITEL 2109 CANNA WAY 47790015258 FAMILY TRUST FOR CHILDRE 2700 BUCKTHORN WAY 7333003081 VICKI L CAPADONA GST-EXEf 7333011028 ATTERBURY, ANDREW L 1376 GREAT EGRET TRAIL 47790022241 PIKE, JANICE L 7333011002 ATTERBURY, ANDREW L 1376 GREAT EGRET TRAIL 7333011222 SILVERSTEIN, MARTIN B 7333011044 SELIGMAN, GREGORY 20 EGLINTON AVE WEST STE 1306 7333011141 AGOSTINO, VINCENT CYNTHIA M AGOSTINO 1205 GORDON RIVER TRL 47790001783 NANCY L WILSON TRUST 2626 BULRUSH LN 7333010906 CIVERA, EDWARD S=& JUDIT 1249 GORDON RIVER TRL 7333010883 FAMILY FIVE ONE LLC 2227 CHARLES LANE 7333003340 KINZENBAW TR, JON E MARCIA A KINZENBAW TR JON E KINZENBAW REV TRU: 7333010922 MICHAEL K GRIMM REV TRU 1245 GORDON RIVER TRL 7333003366 SHULMAN, STEVEN JAY ELLEN LEIFER SHULMAN 1433 NIGHTHAWK POINT 7333010689 1234 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 120 EGLINTON AVE WEST BOX 2059 STE 1306 7333010485 DEBRA MAFFEO REVOCABLE 8220 CRESTWOOD HEIGHTS [ APT #1902 7333010401 WALKER, JUERGEN HEINZ SIGRID WALTRAUD WALKER 1267 OSPREY TRL 7333010964 RICHARD K LUBLIN REV TRU! 1237 GORDON TRAIL 7333010346 MALECKAR, TOD G=& DIANA 1268 OSPREY TRAIL 7333010320 EHLERS, HERBERT E_& MAR` 1272 OSPREY TRL 47790022526 LISA RENEE GURSOY REV TRl 2928 BELLFLOWER LN 7333003324 DAVIDSON, ROBERT M LYNN M YAEGER 1425 NIGHTHAWK PT 7333003188 JANE L BAINUM DECL OF TR18171 MAPLE LAWN BLVD #3i 7333003104 GOLDMAN, NEAL D=& ANGE 1448 NIGHT HAWK PT 7333010948 MICHAEL J MCCABE REV TRL MARY M MCCABE REV TRUST PO BOX 10069 7333011248 MARINO, V JAMES=& MARY 1208 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 47790021488 STEPHEN L KAUFFMAN REV - 2805 SILVERLEAF LN 7333010265 ANN H JOHNSON REV TRUST 1284 OSPREY TRL 7333010427 JOHNSON, J CLIFFORD MARY ANN JOHNSON 1271 OSPREY TRAIL 7333003081 VICKI L CAPADONA GST-EXEf RESIDENCE TRUST 1452 NIGHTHAWK POINTE 47790022241 PIKE, JANICE L 2931 BELLFLOWER LN 7333011222 SILVERSTEIN, MARTIN B ANDREE A HAAS 61 PROSPERT AVE 47790028122 NURMI, THOMAS D MARGUERITE ELAINE NURMI 3025 UNIVERSITY TER NW 47790028588 JANET W MARTIN TRUST 3105 DAHLIA WAY 7333003382 MCCLUTCHY JR, JOHN H=& J 11 MOLLY LN 7333003447 PUOPOLO, KEVIN G=& MAR(1449 NIGHTHAWK POINT 7333003162 EHLERT, CJAMES=& MARILY 1292 S FALCON DR 7333003421 SHEEHY, DONALD R=& PEGG 1445 NIGHTHAWK PT 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1108 7333003405 STEVENS, DAVID D=& DEBOF 1441 NIGHTHAWK PT 7333003146 PODOWSKI, CHARLES H CHARLOTTE A PODOWSKI 7333003120 JOHNSON, GREGORY L KATHLEEN M JOHNSON 7333010760 DORSEY, JAMES F=& MARY J 1248 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 47790027929 CROSSMAN JR, HOWARD F 1658 CHINABERRY CT 47790099627 SAAD JR, SAMUEL J=& FAHAI 1915 COCOPLUM WAY 7333010508 GOODRUM, WILLIAM J CATHERINE T GOODRUM 7333010207 COLE, THOMAS W=& KIM 969 PARK AVE APT 5D 47790028067 GILBERT, ROY H 1649 CHINABERRY WAY 47790099423 NAQUIN, MARY E 1941 COCOPLUM CT 7333003308 BARONE, BRUCE M=& NANC 1421 NIGHTHAWK PT 7333000165 STREIBICH, CYNTHIA 50 EAST MAPLE AVE 7333000149 SMITH, BRYAN L=& JUDITH E 1395 GREAT EGRET TRL 7333010304 HERBERT E EHLERS TRUST 1272 OSPREY TRL 1440 NIGHTHAWK POINTE 1444 NIGHTHAWK PT 1287 OSPREY TRAIL 47790001628 RINKENBERGER, JAMES A MARCIA R RINKENBERGER 2637 BULRUSH LANE 7333000369 MICHAEL T DUKE TRUST M SUSAN DUKE TRUST 1392 GREAT EGRET TRL 7333010867 D H GORDON RIVER LLC 1261 GORDON RIVER TRL 47790001848 R A WEBER TRUST FOR HUSE 2614 BULRUSH LN 77089000122 CCC TRADITIONS LLC 2020 SALZEDO STREET SUITE #200 7333010469 CHABRAJA, NICHOLAS D=& E 1279 OSPREY TRL 7333010980 ALLEN, CAROLE VENUS 1235 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 76925012042 TORINO AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 7333003463 GRENZ TR, RODNEY G ROD G GRENZ REV TRUST M KAY GRENZ TR 51999000225 JONES, CLAYTON M=& DEBC 2059 ISLA VISTA LN 7333010281 PATRICIA D KNOFF REV TRU! 11121 BLUESTEM LANE 7333010249 MESSEY TR, GLORIA MILLS ROBERT JOHN MESSEY TR 1288 OSPREY TRL 7333011060 LOUIS TURSI JR REV TRUST 1221 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 7333010388 SUMEREL, ROBERT B=& SALI ROBERT B SUMEREL TR SALLIE D SUMEREL TR 7333010443 HALLIDAY FAMILY PROPERT) 344 CRYSTAL BAY DR 47790022322 SUSAN L DALTON REV TRUS12947 BELLFLOWER LN 7333003201 SMALLWOOD JR, JOSEPH C MARY BRENNAN SMALLWOC 1428 NIGHTHAWK PT 47790028944 KENT ARENDS 1998 IRREVO(CHILDREN'S TRUST 2004 LONGWOOD LN 47790026386 LAUNDER, JACQUELINE O'TC 2354 ALEXANDER PALM DR 7333010223 SUSAN R SILER FAMILY TRUS 1292 OSPREY TRL 47790028805 ALLEN, SANDRA CESPEDES 3142 DAHLIA WAY 7333010524 DRULEY, THOMAS F=& FRAN 1291 OSPREY TRL 7333000343 HART, GERARD J=& HEATHE13388 VIA LIDO PH2 7333003227 RITA E ROSSER 2004 REV TRI 1424 NIGHT HAWK PT 47790016406 MORRISON, ROBERT H=& SL 2705 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790000904 ENGLAND TR, JOSEPH W MARY JO ENGLAND TR JOSEPH W ENGLAND TRUST 7333000262 EGRETTRAILTRUST 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333011125 CANTERA, RICHARD D=& MP 1209 GORDON RIVER TRL 7333011329 CORWIN, PHILIP M=& JANE 15151 ROCKLEDGE DR 7333011280 TECHAR, FRANKLIN JAMES MARIA SOLEDAD TECHAR 1216 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 7333011264 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 7333011303 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 47790099601 GRUNER, RONALD H=& NAN 1919 COCOPLUM WAY 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1109 47790022542 ROBERT F MCDAVID III TRUS DEBORAH G MCDAVID TRUS12928 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790022665 MYERS, JERRY K=& CRYSTAL 2900 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790160129 ALLEN, DONALD 0=& PATRI(2121 CANNA WAY 47790099368 SCULLY, EDWARD R=& CARC 1908 COCOPLUM WAY 47790017609 CYNTHIA C COOPER REV TRL 2109 CANNA WAY 47790022649 DEANA STRINGER REVOCABl2904 INDIGOBUSH WAY 7333000385 SNIDER, JOHN K=& CAROLE 13 LOCH RIDGE COURT 47790026467 GUAY NAPLES IRREV TRUST 122 LISONALLY CT 47790038882 MOOREHEAD, STEVE=& PHY 1837 PLUMBAGO LANE 47790022186 RANALLI, ROBERT J=& ANN P 2923 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790028986 COOPER, RUSSELL LEE PAULA LEE COOPER 47790027961 CHINABERRY ONE LLC PO BOX 1700 47790000807 TAPPERT, GEORGE R=& JUDI 2406 CHICORY LN 47790022568 THOMAS, EUGENE H KATHLEEN M SHOCKLEY 47790001246 MARY RIFE JAMES TRUST 2507 DAY LILY PLACE 7333011206 SGL PROPERTIES LLC 1912 APPLE BLOSSOM DR 47790160103 C DAVID SHERRILL TRUST 2117 CANNA WAY 47790021527 MARSHA M BANSAVAGE TRI23 BINNEY RD 7333010702 BOBBY, THEODORE N 7333011109 PITTS, JAMES FRANKLIN 7333011086 GRT DEVELOPMENTS LLC MARY KATHRYN BOBBY 1213 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 3106 DAHLIA WAY 2922 INDIGOBUSH WAY 1236 GORDON RIVER TRL 2210 VANDERBILT BEACH RD STE 1300 47790017007 STEPHEN A CULLINAN TRUS12815 TARFLOWER WAY 47790021585 LINDA K DROOK FL QPR TRU: 2829 SILVERLEAF LN 25340000046 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNER'S ASSN INC PO BOX 110339 47790038727 GUTIERREZ, PHILIP L=& KIM 1060 NELSONS WALK 47790016451 DAVID L OSMENT TRUST 2701 BUCKTHORN WAY 7333003285 MACDUFF, CLYDE=& KELLY PO BOX 1200 47790022160 JEANNIE HARRIS MORAN LIV 2919 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790038701 PELAK FAMILY TRUST 1861 PLUMBAGO WAY 47790028847 FRITZ TR, EDNA M EDNA M FRITZ TRUST UTD 1/20/00 47790021569 MURRELL JR, HOWARD J=&! 2827 SILVERLEAF LN 47790028863 BRANDT, JOE R=& EMILY L 3130 DAHLIA WAY 47790028821 KEITH A HARROLD TRUST 4640 DUNROBIN DR NE 7333010540 PINCHEV, ALEX=& MICHELLE 1295 OSPREY TRL 47790021789 VAN OSS, THOMAS J=& BARE 2808 SILVERLEAF LANE 47790028009 JEAN, ROGER=& FRANCINE PO BOX 10360 47790028627 BOWERS, D STUART MARY V PERRY 47790028601 MCINTYRE, MARVIN=& JO Al 3111 DAHLIA WAY 47790021747 MYRA M FRIEDMAN REV TRI, 2816 SILVERLEAF LN 7333000204 HAGEMANN, FREDERICK W SUSAN C HAGEMANN 7333000181 RALPH E MIESEL TRUST 1385 GREAT EGRET TRL 47790021501 HOKANSON, STEPHEN P 2809 SILVERLEAF LN 47790000920 F S PFANNENSTIEHL TRUST JULIA S PFANNENSTIEHL 51999000089 DIANE MESSANA TRUST 2029 ISLA VISTA LN 47790017502 GOETZEIII, RANDLE M=& NA 3900 E MONUMENT ST 7333000220 BOUCHARD, CRAIG T=& MEL 1377 GREAT EGRET TRL 47790026360 MONKS, DONALD R=& DORC 34 PIPPINS WAY 3117 DAHLIA WAY 1381 GREAT EGRET TRAIL 81 BEACON ST 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1110 7333011345 MANCUSO, MICHAEL J=& PC 1226 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 7333010663 YOUNG, PETER M=& KELLY F 1346 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333000123 DUNCAN, THOMAS W=& M� 1397 GREAT EGRET TRL 7333000107 TURNER FAMILY TRUST 201] 1399 GREAT EGRET TRL 7333000408 THOMAS M SMYTHE FL P/R/ GRETA C SMYTHE FL P/R/T 1398 GREAT EGRET TRL 47790001220 STEVENS, BRUCE J=& SUSAN 2511 DAY LILY PL 47790022144 AGNES HALL REV TRUST 2915 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790160365 VERHELLE JR, WILLIAM HENF CYNDEE ANN VERHELLE 2140 CANNA WAY 47790038866 PULPIT RIDGE TRUST 77 KING ST WEST BOX 341, SUITE 4500 47790160349 ZAKMAN, DONALD E_& MAF 2148 CANNA WAY 47790001822 PRESTON TR, STEVEN P=& N STEVEN P & NEDRA A PRESTC NEDRA A PRESTON QPR TRL 47790022348 JANDERNOA, MICHAEL=& SL 171 MONROE AVE NW STE 4' 47790038743 MACKAY TR, RICHARD FRANCINE MACKAY TR MACKAY FAMILY TRUST 47790028889 SPALDING TR, CARL A=& DIA CARL A SPALDING SR R/L TRU DIANE M SPALDING R/L TRU 47790039027 SLMP LLC TRUST 2100 S WARSON RD 47790001644 FRICKS, WILLIAM P=& DEAN12641 BULRUSH LN 47790099465 DONALD M MILLER REV TRU 1924 COCOPLUM WAY 47790027880 GALLAGHER TR, CAROL ZAHARRIS TR, DRAKE C 47790028960 STAYER, LAURA 3110 DAHLIA WAY 47790001084 DAVID LESTER TRUST 14905 SPRINGVIEW RIDGE 47790099407 DEFRANCESCO, ADAM H=& 1942 COCOPLUM CT 47790021640 MILLS, J DAVID=& SHERRY D 2836 SILVERLEAF LN 47790160404 MORIARTY, JAMES J=& BREN 286 SHOREACRES RD 47790028643 STAVISH, MARK=& WENDY 3123 DAHLIA WAY 47790160323 SCHAWK, DAVID A=& TERYL 1089 GLENCREST DR 7333003243 HENDRIK A VERFAILLIE TRUS 1420 NIGHTHAWK PT 47790160381 SPONYOE, JOYCE 2124 CANNA WAY 47790160187 JOSEPH, THOMAS J=& CARO 2133 CANNA CT 47790016707 SAVORETTI, ANDREA K 2823 THISTLE WAY 47790022128 RYDER, DAVID R=& JAN HAIR 2909 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790099588 GOLDMAN TR, BENJAMIN A 1923 COCOPLUM WAY 47790021721 MCNAMARA, JAMES A=& BR 275 S ARLINGTON AVE 47790016752 CYNTHIA A BLOOMHALL REV 2818 THISTLE WAY 47790038921 HALSTATT LLC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY THE GALLAGHER FAMILT RE' 47790023224 WILSON, STEVEN A=& SHAR(PO BOX 649 47790017557 PAWLOWSKI TR, GLENN F GAYLE A ENGELS TR FRANK J PAWLOWSKI Q/P/R 47790017104 RICHARD P BELL REV TRUST 2825 TARFLOWER WAY 47790027987 AEGIS COMMCTN INVESTME 702-2285 LAKE SHORE BLVD' 47790001327 ECKENHOFF, EDWARD A=& J 2537 DAY LILY PL 7333000246 HOLBROOK, BRAD=& LORRA 36 STATION RD STANNINGTON 47790039043 RENNA, EUGENE A=& APRILF 1805 PLUMBAGO WAY 47790028685 JOHNSON, R SHELDON=& VII 3133 DAHLIA WAY 47790038840 DAVIS, MARK A=& NANCY J 1830 PLUMBAGO LN 47790001521 BILL R SANFORD TRUST 2617 BULRUSH LN 7333012043 ESTATE HOMES BY STOCK LL 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #1& 47790016600 WILCHER NAPLES TRUST 2811 THISTLE WAY 47790160268 MOSNER, LAWRENCE J=& JU 2149 CANNA WAY 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1111 9.C.7 47790099546 MCBRIDE, PAUL F CHRISTINA BETH MCBRIDE 7816 RUXWOOD RD 47790022364 KOOP, ALVIN=& ROBIN 242 LAKESHORE DR N 47790016150 ROVICK, ROGER L=& CAROL. 47790017159 BARTHOLOMEW, DOUGLAS JOYCE H BARTHOLOMEW 2828 TARFLOWER WAY 13804040101 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAG 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 1& 22712000020 AVILA AT GREY OAKS HOME(ASSOC INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MGM 22712000622 AVILA AT GREY OAKS HOME(ASSOC INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MGM 47790022209 AUGSBURY TR, IMOGEN S THOMAS E LAROSE TR FRANK A AUGSBURY JR GST - 47790160242 BAYLIN, JACK L=& GAIL B 2145 CANNA WAY 47790016859 RICHARD W BLACKBURN 20C 2806 THISTLE WAY 47790028669 FORD JR, HARRY M=& JOSEP 3129 DAHLIA WAY MARIA D FURMAN REV TRUS MARIA D FURMAN QPRT 47790015708 STRINGHAM, PETER E ALBERTA J MCLEOD-STRINGH 2736 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790001204 HARKINS, JOHN H=& CHERYL 2515 DAY LILY PL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIC C/O RESORT MANAGEMENT 7333003269 HEEBNER, DAVID K 1416 NIGHT HAWK PT 107 COVINGTON CT 47790028782 SHARON C DEWITT REV TRU; 3146 DAHLIA WAY 2517 SPICEBUSH LN 47790160307 SCHAPER, J JEFFREY=& COLL 2156 CANNA WAY 47790001408 JOHNSON, BRIAN D KATHERINE H JOHNSON 2521 DAY LILY PL 47790001660 STOUT, JIM=& CYNTHIA 2650 BULRUSH LN 47790000946 GOTSIS, WILLIAM 11 SUMMIT VIEW 47790023185 HALPERT, BURTON S=& LINE 1 VAUCLUSE LN 47790099384 JULIE C HOGAN LIV TRUST C/O INDUSTRY CONSULTING PO BOX 8265 47790160284 SHEPPARD, JEROME=& JOSE 2153 CANNA WAY 47790160145 JENSEN, JOHN S=& DEBRA A 2125 CANNA WAY 76925012026 TORINO AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 47790001181 POTTER, THOMAS A=& CAM 5060 BRIDLE PATH RD 47790038905 MASSARO, LOUIS L=& CAROI 1833 PLUMBAGO LN 47790160226 TRUMAN 2013 SC3 TITLE TRI 15480 LAGUNA CANYON RD 47790000988 WITTOCK, JULIE KENISTON 3463 PINE RIDGE RD 47790099562 JESSIE W MOBLEY REV TRUS' 1927 COCOPLUM WAY 7333010841 B H ESTUARY LLC 1261 GORDON RIVER TRL 47790017654 COPPERMAN, HAROLD D=& 2804 TARFLOWER WAY 77089000025 VILLAS OF TRADITONS AT GREY OAKES HOMEOWNERS % SENTRY MGMT, INC 47790016150 ROVICK, ROGER L=& CAROL. 2661 ARCOLA LN 47790016558 CAPISTRANO I TRUST HESTER, THOMAS P=& NANC' 2807 THISTLE WAY 47790021666 NICEWONDER, KENNETH DO NICEWONDER, ETTA M 148 BRISTOL EAST RD 47790021705 CONROY TR, CAROL A CAROL A CONROY REV TRUST MICHAEL D & TIMOTHY COP 7333010362 NANCY BORELLI REV TRUST 1264 OSPREY TRL 47790016503 WILSON JR, FREDERICK E 2803 THISTLE WAY 47790016859 RICHARD W BLACKBURN 20C 2806 THISTLE WAY 47790022584 JOHN A DUFFY REV TRUST MARIA D FURMAN REV TRUS MARIA D FURMAN QPRT 47790028708 SWIFT FAMILY TRUST 49 WINFIELD LANE 51999000047 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIC C/O RESORT MANAGEMENT 47790015902 MANOFSKY, CARL M=& KATI 107 COVINGTON CT 47790001424 MCGLINCHEY, JOSEPH D 2517 SPICEBUSH LN 47790022102 MCALOON, BRIAN=& MARY 2905 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790022089 SMITH JR, ROGER BERRY 2901 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790016655 DAVID A SCHAWK 1998 TRU:1089 GLENCREST DR 47790160200 WESLEY, NANCY W CHARLES R WESLEY III 2137 CANNA CT 47790099449 DOLBEN, ALICE B 1937 COCOPLUM CT Packet Pg. 1112 47790016105 ALDRICH, SUSAN RAMSEY 2737 BUCKTHORN WAY 7333000288 ATTERBURY, ANDREW L GWYN A PRENTICE 1376 GREAT EGRET TRL 7333000327 MITCHELL, JAMES=& MARG/ 1380 GREAT EGRET TRL 47790015753 CHAMPION, JAMES K=& HIL[ 2740 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790038963 INMAN, WILLIAM J=& PATRI, 1821 PLUMBAGO WAY 47790000865 DETWEILER, CAROLE S=& JO 2418 CHICORY LN 47790028724 GLORE, JODIE K=& SANDRA 3141 DAHLIA WAY 47790160161 VAN OTTERLOO, EYK A ROSE MARIE VAN OTTERLOO 2129 CANNA CT 47790021682 BACIGALUPO, CHARLES A EILEEN S BACIGALUPO 2828 SILVERLEAF LN 47790038947 DEPASQUALE, ESTHER 1825 PLUMBAGO LANE 47790028740 STEPHEN D QUINN LIV TRUS" C A PETERSON QUINN LIV TRI 3145 DAHLIA WAY 47790038769 MCCAW, DANIEL L=& DIANE 1849 PLUMBAGO WAY 47790000962 MUELLER, MICHAEL J=& JAN 2438 INDIAN PIPE WAY 47790015957 EGRET TRAIL TRUST 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790021802 MORFITT, MARTHA ANNA M PATRICK LEO WEBER 2804 SILVERLEAF LANE 47790000784 PHELPS TR, ROBERT ROBERT J PHELPS TRUST UTD 9/11/07 47790028766 BENSON, MICHAEL D=& SHIF 3150 DAHLIA WAY 47790001686 LANG, BRUCE MICHAEL MURIEL MARIE LANG 2646 BULRUSH LN 47790000881 SCHREIER, BRADLEY MARJORIE SCHREIER K 2422 INDIAN PIPE WAY 76925000122 TORINO AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 47790022267 JULIET C SPROUL REV TRUST 2935 BELLFLOWER LN 47790015656 DOWSON, JOHN J=& NANCY 2732 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790038785 DESIMONE, LISE 1845 PLUMBAGO WAY 7333012027 WAGGONER, DONALD F=& Z 1252 GORDON RIVER TRL 47790038824 KASSEM, GARY 1826 PLUMBAGO LN 7333010728 BROWN TR, CRAIG D CRAIG D BROWN REV LIV TRL UTD 3/31/83 47790038808 MCGOUGH TR, THOMAS J=& JEAN B MCGOUGH REV TRUS 9 W BAY LN 47790001301 SMITH, BENSON F=& LINDA 110965 MAPLE HILL LANE 7333011167 COMMITTE JR, THOMAS C=81201 GORDON RIVER TRL 47790050187 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 76925012709 PURPURA, SALVATORE A=& 2070 TORINO WAY 47790001262 OLMSTED, ADAM K=& ANNE 2520 DAY LILY PL 76925012068 TORINO AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 20767010957 COLLIER CNTY E NAPLES FIRE CONTRL/RES E N NAPLES FIRE CONTRL/RES 47790021608 DAVID L BRENNAN TRUST 2835 SILVERLEAF LN 47790022380 SOLOVE, TAMARA DENISE 2956 BELLFLOWER LN 22712001320 AVILA AT GREY OAKS HOME(ASSOC INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MGM 47790015805 SLOAN, LARRY E 2744 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790008003 GREY OAKS COUNTY CLUB IN 2400 GREY OAKS DR N 22712000923 AVILA AT GREY OAKS HOME(ASSOC INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MGM 47790008508 HALSTATT LLC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790016053 S MACLENNAN CROWLEY TR 2743 BUCKTHORN WAY 266000006 EARL G HODGES FAM TRUST 2140 COACH HOUSE LN 22712000224 AVILA AT GREY OAKS HOME(ASSOC INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MGM 47790000409 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790021365 REFERENCE ONLY L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM 53220000280 RICHIE, LEROY C=& JULIA T 111 WILLITS SUTE 300 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1113 53220000303 BURGESS, W STEPHEN=& JO, 2396 TERRA VERDE LANE 53220000329 SILVERMAN, CHARLES JOYCE S HAGEL-SILVERMAN 2630 GREY OAKS DRIVE N #: 53220000345 RUSSELL R WAGGONER JR RI 2630 GREY OAKS DR N APT 1- 53220000361 GLYNN, JAMES V=& MARY G 687 MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE 53220000387 RHINESMITH, STEPHEN H KATHLEEN L RHINESMITH 2630 GREY OAKS DR N #19 53220000400 THOMPSON, WESLEY M=& N 2630 GREY OAKS DR N 53220000426 BROWN, JAMES E_& PAMEL, 2630 GREY OAKS DR N APT 2: 53220000442 CONROY, EDMUND F=& CAR 2640 GREY OAKS DR N #22 53220000468 BARTON, ELIZABETH H 2640 GREY OAKS DR N APT 2: 53220000484 IRVING A LEWIS RESIDENCE - 2640 GREY OAKS DR N 53220000507 BRENNAN JR, JOHN=& DORC 849 CELLA RD 53220000523 DAWKINS, PETER M=& JUD112640 GREY OAKS DR N #26 53220000549 POLK DECEDENTS TRUST POLK QTIP TRUST 53220000565 FLAGG, CLINTON D=& MART 2640 GREY OAKS DRIVE N #2(' 53220000581 CERNY, MARK J=& JITKA M 2640 GREY OAKS DR N 47790026027 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 13170000529 MOORINGS INCORPORATED 120 MOORINGS PARK DR 47790130049 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 13170001023 MOORINGS INC 120 MOORINGS PARK DR 7333002066 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790038497 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 22712000428 AVILA AT GREY OAKS HOME(ASSOC INC 258971509 WORLD TENNIS CLUB INC 4802 AIRPORT PULLING RD N 265680003 C R & S M HAGERSTROM LIV 2482 COACH HOUSE LN 265720002 HAVIG, MICHAEL T=& KIMBE 2550 COACH HOUSE LN 2640 GREY OAKS DR N APT NEWELL PROPERTY MGM 30550000054 WINN, WILLIAM 2600 COACH HOUSE LN 265760004 RUMBERGER, EDWARD A BARBARA H RUMBERGER 2652 COACH HOUSE LN 265560000 BOLL, GREGORY G 2263 COACH HOUSE LN 265600009 JONES III, FALCONER=& BRIC 2211 KINGFISH ROAD 266800002 THELMA T HODGES REV TRU 2140 COACH HOUSE LANE 265480009 MIHM, WILLIAM J=& SANDR 2832 COACH HOUSE LN 265520008 MARTIN, ROBERT W=& DEN12848 COACH HOUSE LN 266240002 QUINBY III, CLYDE C=& EMM 2400 COACH HOUSE LN 13170000024 MOORINGS INCORPORATED 120 MOORINGS PARK DR 47790050103 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB I % BARRON COLLIER COMPAN 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790000771 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 266200000 HODGES, THELMA T 2140 COACH HOUSE LN 266080000 FRANCIS D NEWELL REV TRU 2900 COACH HOUSE LN 266440006 FULLER, ROBERT C 2430 COACH HOUSE LN 7333008060 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 76925000025 MIRAMONTE AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 47790050145 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 258972702 WARRENTON ENTERPRISES ( 3322 OLYMPIC DR APT 222 7333002121 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790130081 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 76925000041 MIRAMONTE AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 267040007 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1114 47790100024 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 25340000062 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNER'S ASSN INC PO BOX 110339 47790038400 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 13170001528 MOORINGS INCORPORATED 120 MOORINGS PARK DR 7333007087 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333010100 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 47790038387 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333000084 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790099326 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333010650 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 51999000063 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIC C/O RESORT MANAGEMENT 7333002105 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790050064 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB I % BARRON COLLIER COMPAN 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333009069 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 25340000020 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNER'S ASSN INC PO BOX 110339 7333010087 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790026661 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790008757 COLLIER COUNTY 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E % OFC OF THE COUNTY ATT( 79840000026 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC INC % RESORT MANAGMENT 267200009 SCHOOL DISTRICT -PES POINCIANA ELEMENTARY % SUPERINTENDENT 77089000106 CCC TRADITIONS LLC 2020 SALZEDO STREET SUITE #200 267120406 AGR TM LLC % ANGELO, GORDON & CO 245 PARK AVE FL 26 47790024207 TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAKS 3200 BAILEY LN STE 117 47790028562 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS � 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333003065 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN( 2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790026043 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 256720008 WORLD TENNIS CLUB INC 4802 AIRPORT PULLING RD N 267120008 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CC PROPERTY TAX-PSX/JB 700 UNIVERSE BLVD 47790130023 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790026629 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790026085 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 267120105 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAG 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 1& 47790160022 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790026069 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790000108 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 76925000148 MIRAMONTE AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 76925000203 MIRAMONTE AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 47790021983 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 20765401403 SCHOOL DISTRICT-PES2 POINCIANA ELEMENTARY % SUPERINTENDENT 47790024825 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790008537 ODONNELL LANDSCAPES INC 4291 WILLIAMS RD 47790000205 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790023020 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 258972605 EVANS, RICHARD H PO BOX 1449 7333002053 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790038426 ODONNELL LANDSCAPES INC 4291 WILLIAMS RD 47790022063 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1115 9.C.7 267120901 REFERENCE ONLY TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESID AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMIf 77087000027 FLEGEL, S LESLIE=& ELYNOR 2307 TRADITION WAY #A1 1C 77087000043 HLR INVESTMENTS LP 5800 MERLE HAY ROAD SUITI PO BOX 394 77087000069 FECCI, DENNIS P=& ELIZABE143 HAMLET DR 77087000085 FLANIGAN, MICHAEL P LISA L TRUBIANO 2307 TRADITION WAY 77087000108 VICTOR A BONOMO REV TRL 2311 TRADITION WAY #A2-1( 77087000124 CUNNINGHAM, ROBERT H=8321 NORTH GLENHURST DRI\ 77087000140 CERVIERI JR ET AL, JOSEPH L 10064 CHERRY HILLS AVENUE 77087000166 STIKELEATHER, ALLAN=& LIN 2311 TRADITIONS WAY #202 77087000182 MACDUFF, CLYDE E_& KELLY 1142 PARTRIDGE LANE 77087000205 BURKE, PAUL JOSEPH LINDSEY A BURKE 1000 S PINE ISLAND ROAD 77087000221 GILCHRIST, JAMES ROBERT GINA RAY GILCHRIST 507 CASCADE DR 77087000247 LINK, JOHN F=& KATHERINE 6 STEEPLECHASE LANE 77087000263 BOWEN, ROBERT M=& MAR 2319 TRADITION WAY #A4-1( 77087000289 STARK, SANDRA M 2319 TRADITION WAY #102 77087000302 SCHENK, ROBERT H SUZANNA A SCHENK 2319 TRADITION WAY #201 77087000328 LENROW, KRISTINE C 2319 TRADITION WAY #A4-2( 77087000344 LOWERY, JOHN=& SANDRA 2446 RIDGECROFT AVE SE 77087000360 DAN TR, NANCY M NANCY M DAN LIVING TRUST 2323 TRADITION WAY #102 77087000386 BOYD, JOSEPH W=& DARLEN 2323 TRADITION WAY #201 77087000409 SALVATORI, LEO J=& SHELLE' 2323 TRADITION WAY UNIT 2 77087000425 ZARROLI, MARY E 2314 TRADITION WAY #A6-1( 77087000441 OFLAHERTY, JOHN J=& NAN(2314 TRADITION WAY #A6-1( 77087000467 JOHN S LESKIW REV LIV TRU. 3609 DOWNING STREET 77087000483 GRACEY, R THOMAS=& SAN[ 3177 OLYMPIA LN 77087000506 BAILEY, DEBRA JEAN 2310 TRADITION WAY UNIT A7-101 77087000522 ROSEMARIE K ETTLINGER TR 2310 TRADITION WAY #A7-1( 77087000548 PASINI, LAWRENCE A ELIZABETH A PASINI 43 ARROWWOOD CIR 77087000564 CHAPMAN, DOUGLAS F=& L( 2310 TRADITION WAY UNIT A7-202 77087000580 WETZEL, STUART A=& SHER12306 TRADITION WAY #A8-1( 77087000603 LAFONTAINE, STEVEN G MARIA P LAFONTAINE 3 PLUNKETT PLACE 77087000629 GARY DUANE BIGHAM REV 12306 TRADITION WAY #201 77087000645 ACHECAR M D, FREDDY A MARIA R ACHECAR 2306 TRADITION WAY UNIT 77087000661 DAVID L BRENNAN TRUST 121 S MAIN ST STE 500 77087000687 PIERSON, DONALD P 2305 RESIDENCE CIRCLE UNIT A9-102 77087000700 DANIS, STEPHEN F=& MARY 2305 RESIDENCE CIRCLE #A9- 77087000726 WEINAND, GARY J 2305 RESIDENCE CIRCLE UNIT A9-202 77087001547 BIRRANE, JOHN H=& FRANCE 2309 RESIDENCE CIR #131-101 77087001563 REUTER, WILLIAM J=& SELIN 2309 RESIDENCE CIR #102 77087001589 LORENTZ, ROBERT P DANNIE MAXEY LORENTZ 3490 TOURNAMENT DR 77087001602 JAMES SIMON REV TRUST LYNN LAGOMARSINO TRUST 2309 RESIDENCE CIRCLE #131 77087001628 BISSONTZ, DANIEL J=& CELIN 2312 BERWICK CT 77087001644 MCNALLY TR, EDWARD C MARGARET M MCNALLY TR 2312 BERWICK CT UNIT 102 77087001660 HOLTHAUS, GERARD E CONSTANCE HOLTHAUS 2312 BERWICK CT #201 77087001686 DAN TR, JODY L JODY L DAN REV TRUST 2312 BERWICK CT UNIT 202 77087001709 KATHERINE T PREBISH TRUS-434 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 77087001725 BOCK, GARRETT C 2313 RESIDENCE CIRCLE #133 - Packet Pg. 1116 77087001741 P W ZALOKAR REV TRUST OF 2313 RESIDENCE CIRCLE UNIT 133-201 77087001767 IRVILENE J GARDNER TRUST 4845 WEST 90TH STREET 77087001783 STOLBERG, DOUGLAS FARRE JOAN ELLEN STOLBERG 2317 RESIDENCE CIR #101 77087001806 JAECKEL, RICHARD A=& CAR(2317 RESIDENCE CIR #134-102 77087001822 JOHN P BURKE & JUDITH A B REVOCABLE TRUST 3479 HIGHLAND CENTER DR 77087001848 C DALE REIS & KATHERINE G MCCARTHY REIS FAMILY TRU 2317 RESIDENCE CIR #202 77087001864 MCCARTHY, THOMAS W=& [ 2321 RESIDENCE Cl #135-101 77087001880 LAMBERTSEN, ROBERT H LINDA I LAMBERTSEN 2321 RESIDENCE CIR #135-10 77087001903 MEYER, LAWRENCE G LINDA ELIZABETH MEYER 2321 RESIDENCE CIR #201 77087001929 TRUST NO 2321-B5-202 2321 RESIDENCE CIRCLE #20: 77087001945 MACARTHUR, ROBERTS 2325 RESIDENCE CIR #101 77087001961 GOOD, JAMES=& HELEN 2325 RESIDENCE CIR UNIT 10 77087001987 FREUND, MATTHIAS=& MAR 2325 RESIDENCE CIRCLE #66- 77087002009 FROSCHLE, CHARLES F=& JO) 2325 RESIDENCE CIR # 202 76925012084 TORINO AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 7333002037 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790024223 REFERENCE ONLY TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM 76520000022 JENKINS, EDWARD L=& SUSP 2458 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000048 BACCILE, PETER E 5 ASHTON DR 76520000064 BACCILE, JOANNE M PETER E BACCILE 76520000080 NICHOLAS A HUNTER TRUST 16 RAYNOR DR 76520000103 PEARSALL, HENRY B=& JANE 2448 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000129 TRANTER, NYDIA G NYDIA C TRANTER TR 76520000145 DEWALD, RONALD L=& MAR 2444 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000161 BEVERLY J HAAS TRUST 2442 TERRA VERDE LANE 76520000187 FARRELL, GARY N=& JANE G 2438 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000200 2436 TERRA VERDE LANE TR 2436 TERRA VERDE LN 2454 TERRA VERDE LN NYDIA C TRANTER TRUST 76520000226 K B DOLLENBERG LIV TRUST 11702 FALLSWOOD TER 76520000242 CLEAVER EST, VIRGINIA D % JAMES P CLEAVER JR PR 368 YOUNGS CORNERS RD 76520000268 MURRAY, WILLIAM B ELIZABETH J MURRAY 76520000284 MCGEE, DAVID WILLIAM 1053 CLONSILLA AVENUE 76520000307 SPIVACK, JEROME=& STEFAf 2628 FAR VIEW DR 76520000323 FLANNERY, MARK MANUEL GUERRERO 76520000349 SCHRIBER, ROBERT A=& STE12418 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000365 MCGLOTHLIN, THOMAS D 112 PHLOX CREEK 76520000381 GLYNN, CHRISTOPHER M 2414 TERRA VERDE LANE 76520000404 ACQUAVIVA, JAY 193 PARTRIDGE LN 76520000420 MARCIA NELSON PAYNE TRI, 2133 FIR STREET 76520000446 DEMEO, DANIEL R 2406 TERRA VERDE LANE 76520000462 WALL, SUSAN J 2404 TERRA VERDE LANE #24 76520000488 SUSAN E DAWLEY REV TRUS- 2402 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000501 HEALY, PATRICK G=& JULIE N 2398 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000527 BURGESS, W STEPHEN=& JO, 2396 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000543 HARRISON, DIANA J 2394 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000569 RON AND LIZ BROWN REV Tf 2392 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000585 ROVICK, ROGER L=& CAROL. 2661 ARCOLA LANE 76520000608 JANET L BERGMAN REV TRU' 2386 TERRA VERDE LANE 86 KLINE RD 237 KLOTTER AVENUE 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1117 9.C.7 76520000624 MCGEENEY, JOHN S=& DIAN 2384 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000640 VOR BROKER, ROBERT S=& S PO BOX 909 76520000666 SHARON MOON REV TRUST 26 WOODLAWN AVE 76520000682 HALL, TIMOTHY E JILL LAWSON HALL 76520000705 SUGRUE, MICHAEL F=& MOP 2374 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000721 GERARDI, EUGENE=& CHERY 142 COUNTRY CLUB DR 76520000747 LODGE, GERALD M MOLLY F ASHBY 76520000763 CURK, LAWRENCE L=& NANC 2366 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000789 HARTZBERG, IVAN S=& MAR 2364 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000802 HELLER, ALEXANDRA E_& PF 1901 GALLEON DRIVE 76520000828 DIRENZO, ROBERT M=& SUS, 2358 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000844 MEHLMAN, ARTHUR S=& JUI2356 TERRA VERDE LANE 76520000860 HABERFIELD, GLENN=& DOR 3 VILLAGE WAY 76520000886 WILLIAMS, SUSAN J 2352 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000909 GERARDI, GASPER V=& VALE 1 HOLBROOK CT 76520000925 KRUCKEL, KATHRYN T 950 FRANKLIN LAKES RD 76520000941 LAWRENCE J BLUM TRUST 2385 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000967 ROSS JR, THOMAS J=& ELISE 11 MAGNOLIA PLACE 47790027741 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790021459 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 2376 TERRA VERDE LANE 1021 PARK AVE 7333010621 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790025222 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 77089000148 VILLAS OF TRADITIONS AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNERS A % SENTRY MGMT, INC 13800022000 COLLIER CNTY 2685 HORSESHOE DR S STE 2 47790009002 COLLIER COUNTY 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E % OFC COUNTY ATTORNEY 7333010634 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790024922 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790008524 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790050226 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 267121007 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS � 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790015203 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 52731006567 KENSINGTON PARK MSTR AS C/O NEWELL PROPERTY MNC 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 7333002147 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333009085 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790025125 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790038484 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB I % BARRON COLLIER COMPAN 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790000506 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 256400001 WORLD TENNIS CLUB INC 4802 AIRPORT PULLING RD N 47790038688 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333010142 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790008553 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAG 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 1& 20767010407 ROYAL POINCIANA GOLF CLL 1600 SOLANA RD 47790038581 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB I % BARRON COLLIER COMPAN 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790000768 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 61941000001 FRANK TR, WILLIAM H PAUL L FRANK TR C/O BARNETT BANKS TRUST 7333010647 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790002504 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY Packet Pg. 1118 9.C.7 NAME4 LEGALI LEGAL2 LEGAL3 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHTEEN GC -19 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT D 4851 TAM IAM I 1 2549 25 COMM NW CNR OI OF TORINO AND MIRAM ALG SOUTH R/W W 50FTTO F ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT C ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT C ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT C ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT H L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS TRACT C 2640 GOLDEN G L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK' TRACT A AVILA UNIT ONE LOT 104 AVILA UNIT ONE LOT 105 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 506 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 604 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 505 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 402 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 501 AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 205 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 606 AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 305 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 401 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 605 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 612 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 409 AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 207 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 503 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 403 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 509 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 511 AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 307 AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 304 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 608 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 408 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 609 KAREN L THOMF AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 204 Al THAT PORTION OF TRAC' GREY OAKS UNIT THREE DESC AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 404 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 610 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 611 2630 TRILLIUM \ AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 405 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 512 AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 202 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 1 AVILA UNIT ONE LOT 101 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 2 AND THAT PORTIC 1 DESC AS: COM NLYMOST CI\ AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 508 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT J TORINO REPLAT LOT 29 Packet Pg. 1119 9.C.7 2180 WEST SR 4 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT C TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 3 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 7 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 10 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 24 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 25 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 2 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 23 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 6 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 41 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 40 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 22 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 36 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 4 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 39 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 11 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 12 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 21 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 20 AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 302 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 8 AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 208 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 602 TORINO REPLAT LOT 33 TORINO REPLAT LOT 32 AVILA UNIT ONE LOT 102 TORINO REPLAT LOT 5 TORINO REPLAT LOT 13 TORINO REPLAT LOT 15 TORINO REPLAT LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT K TORINO LOT 37 REPLAT LOT AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 301 TORINO REPLAT LOT 16 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 502 TORINO REPLAT LOT 31 TORINO REPLAT LOT 30 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE THA PORTION OF TRACT D AS OR 4577 PG 2485-86 AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 201 L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK: LOT 8 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 1, LESS THAT PORTIO AS: COM NLYMOST CNR LOT AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 504 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 38 TORINO REPLAT LOT 35 L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK'TRACT B 2685 HORSESHC L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK'TRACT C AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 203 Packet Pg. 1120 9.C.7 TORINO REPLAT LOT 17 TORINO REPLAT LOT 27 TORINO REPLAT LOT 26 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE THA PORTION OF TRACT GC -7 COM NW CNR TR GC -7 BEING ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT B L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 7 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 607 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 9 TORINO REPLAT LOT 19 TORINO REPLAT LOT 28 TORINO REPLAT LOT 34 AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 206 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT B TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 32 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN TRA 10 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT A TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 36 AVILA UNIT ONE LOT 103 TORINO REPLAT LOT 18 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 45 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 46 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 14 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 601 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 31 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 48 2666 LERMITAGI L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK: LOT 10 L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK' LOT 9 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 49 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT A L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 22 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 47 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 44 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 6 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 407 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 406 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 33 AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 306 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 50 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 51 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 18 TORINO REPLAT LOT 42 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 59 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 17 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 58 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 35 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN TRACT B Packet Pg. 1121 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 28 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 19 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 52 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 60 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 57 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 34 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 16 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 510 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN TRACT A TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 56 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 15 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 5 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 20 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 21 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE TRACT A (LANDSCAPE BL TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 1 L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK; LOT 11 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 39 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 37 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 507 TORINO REPLAT LOT 47 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 55 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 38 TORINO REPLAT LOT 48 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 30 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS TRACT B TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 13 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT29 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 53 TORINO REPLAT LOT 49 TORINO REPLAT LOT 50 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 1 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 3 TORINO REPLAT LOT 51 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 40 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 54 TORINO REPLAT LOT 52 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 23 TORINO REPLAT LOT 53 2685 HORSESHC ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS TRACT A ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 39 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 38 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 37 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 1 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 61 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 22 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1122 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 603 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN TRA 9 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 9 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 41 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT B TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 11 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 8 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT A ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 36 AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 303 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 42 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 9 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 35 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 34 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 6 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 30 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT G ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT F GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 9 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 33 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 12 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 29 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 8 2302 SILVER PAL GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 7 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 33 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 34 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 35 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 10 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 5 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 13 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 22 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 25 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 25 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 30 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 26 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 7 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 32 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 5 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1123 UTD 6/12/06 WEYBRIDGE ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 26 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 8 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 12 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 28 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 29 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 6 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 27 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 26 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 7 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 31 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 10 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 24 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 28 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 3 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 20 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 11 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 36 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 6 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 31 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 24 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 25 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 27 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 16 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 23 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 21 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 1 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 27 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 13 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 22 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 6 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS TRACT A TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 13 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1124 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 15 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 23 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 13 1705 VENEZIA VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 2 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 8 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 14 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 15 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 34 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 27 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 33 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 5 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 35 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT B ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 20 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 32 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE TRACT C TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 4 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 5 GERALD R LANZ ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 13 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 21 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 26 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 16 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 7 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 20 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR TRACT GC -8, OR 1808 PC ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 17 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 6 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 11 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 14 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 3 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 15 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 17 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 3 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1125 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 25 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 4 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 19 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 6 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 36 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 19 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 10 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 4 HOVE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 3 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 16 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 19 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 18 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 12 TORINO REPLAT LOT 46 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 24 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 12 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 18 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 18 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 23 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 2 2249 MIRAMON TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 1 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 10 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 22 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 13 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 17 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 9 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 20 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 13 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 6 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 11 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 21 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 17 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 23 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1126 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 24 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 21 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 4 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 26 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 17 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 9 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 8 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 20 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 19 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 18 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 15 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 16 UTD 12/13/99 U GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT TORINO LOTS 43-45 REPLAT LOT 43 LAUREN T MICHI ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 24 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 7 TORINO LOTS 43-45 REPLAT LOT 44 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE TRACT A-1 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 12 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 20 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 14 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 12 JOHN A MINUTE ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 21 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 8 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 62 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 5 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 19 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 19 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 20 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 21 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 5 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 3 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 43 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 6 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 25 2051 ISLA VISTA ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 6 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 32 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1127 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 8 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 1 TORINO LOTS 43-45 REPLAT LOT 45 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 22 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 11 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 13 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 14 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 11 2180 WEST SR 4 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT D TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 28 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 2037 ISLA VISTA ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 3 UTD 5/5/98 - UT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 10 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 31 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 24 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 25 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 23 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 23 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 15 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 5 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 3 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 16 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 4 SUZANNE M BOI ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 16 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 6 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 8 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 20 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 26 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 3 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 17 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 24 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 8 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1128 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 22 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 17 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 17 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 15 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 27 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 24 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 21 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 10 2028 ISLA VISTA ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 19 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 21 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 8 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 17 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 22 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 22 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 19 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 20 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 23 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 10 STE 1210 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 1 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 30 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 29 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 6 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 OR 2005 PG 206 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT Z GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 94 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 95 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT ] OR 1808 PG 709 LEO KAPOR REV GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 61 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 21 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 87 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1129 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 25 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 15 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 8 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 35 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT Z - GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 30 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 40 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE TRACT B (LANDSCAPE BL GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 12 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 15 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT OR 1929 PG 2088 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 191 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 190 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 103 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 OR 1936 PG 2183 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 OR 2066 PG 2110 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 14 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT THAT PORTION OF LOT 9 IN OR 2409 PG 580 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 1 2180 WEST SR 4: TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT B GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 195 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 20 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 15 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT -r OR 1817 PG 824 UTD 12/1/05 UT GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 17 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 3 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1130 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 89 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 16 BOX 278 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 114 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 16 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 50 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 56 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 19 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 18 BOX 2059 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 20 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 25 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT E ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 13 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 MARCIA A KINZE ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 11 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 8 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 13 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 6 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 30 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 1i OR 1975 PG 51 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 29 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 19 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 174 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 19 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 18 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1131 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 17 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 6 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 16 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 6 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 43 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT � TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT L2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 17 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO REPLAT TRACT E M KAY GRENS RE ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 20 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 8 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 21 1263 OSPREY TR ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 10 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 13 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 192 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 185 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 17 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 13 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 8 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT MARYJO ENGLA GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT i ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 9 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 24 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 34 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 32 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 31 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 33 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 14 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1132 9.C.7 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT LESS THAT PORTION DES SOUTH COMMON CNR OF LO - GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 5 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 15 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT OR 2054 PG 0543 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 194 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT AND THAT PORTION OF I DESC AS: COM SOUTH COMM GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT Z- OR 1794 PG 763 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 28 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 11 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 23 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 22 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT LESS THAT PORTION DES 2409 PG 580 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 11 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS TRACT B GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 1 3134 DAHLIA Wi GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 187 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 104 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 188 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 186 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 115 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 13 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 176 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 175 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 113 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 6 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 5 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 101 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT f ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 13 Packet Pg. 1133 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 35 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 1 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 1 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 17 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 16 STEVEN P PREST GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 53 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT 1100 RUE DE LA GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 3 UTD 12/21/90 U GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 189 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 17 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 7 UTD 12/12/01 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 193 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 108 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 19 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 177 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 8 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 85 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 13 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 86 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 12 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT MARY LOU PAW GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 92 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 12 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT � ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 8 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 179 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 8 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 38 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP REPLAT OF LOTS 7,8 ANC LOT 9A GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 83 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 12 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1134 9.C.7 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 93 N I C L F 27 49 25 THAT POR -TION OF LOT 97 LYING N GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY, LES 5435 JAEGER RD AVILA UNIT ONE TRACT A 5435 JAEGER RD AVILA UNIT FOUR TRACT A EXEMPT QTIP M GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 178 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 65 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT � OR 1778 PG 1719 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 184 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 14 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 LESS THAT PORTION DES BEG AT SLY MOST CNR OF LO - GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 3 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 13 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 6 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO REPLAT TRACT D GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 12 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 2180 WEST SR 4 TRADITIONS, THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 11 EDMUND F CON GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 111 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 88 MARIDA D FURL GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 180 2685 HORSESHC ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS TRACT B GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 69 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 84 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 6 Packet Pg. 1135 9.C.7 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 10 & S1/2 OF LOT 11 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 & N1/2 OF LOT 1. GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 14 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT E GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 181 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 110 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 13 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 182 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 70 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 116 2402 CHICORY L GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 183 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 FOLL: BEG SLY MOST CNR OF GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT E 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE TRACT F GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOTS 125 AND 126 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 64 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP REPLAT OF LOTS 7,8,ANE LOT 7A GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 7 1240 GORDON F ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOTS 4 & 5 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 6 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 2THAT PART OF LOT 26 DE BEG AT SW CNR LOT 27, N 391 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 26 & 27 GREY OAKS UNIT FIFTEEN TRACT GC -16 TORINO REPLAT LOT 54 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 2THAT PART OF LOT 26 DE BEG NW CNR LOT 25, N 21DD 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO REPLAT TRACT J 3301 TAMIAMI 1 UNPLATTED LANDS 26 49 25 NE CNR OF SEC 26 THEN(LI OF SEC N 89DEG 24129"11W GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 106 AND LOT 107 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOTS 131 + 132 5435 JAEGER RD AVILA UNIT SIX TRACT A (ROAD R/W) GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOTS 67 AND 68 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE TRA AND THAT PORT TR GC4 IN OR 2016 PG 68, LESS GREY 5435 JAEGER RD AVILA UNIT FIVE TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT THREE TRACT E, LESS E 307FT 0 S 2900FT OF N 3000FT, LESS E GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT AND 71 23 49 25 SE1/4 OF SW1/4 OI SE1/4 OF SW1/4 5435 JAEGER RD AVILA UNIT TWO TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT TWO TRACT ""B"" ( BUFFER ) GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE THAT OF TRACT ""C"" N/K/A CAT GREY OAKS CONDO PH I A' L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT Packet Pg. 1136 9.C.7 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT' L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT ; L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT ; L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT ; L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT ; L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN TRACT A MOORINGS PARK AT GREY CTRACT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHTEEN ' GC -18 MOORINGS PARK AT GREY CTRACT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS RO/ CLUBHOUSE & MAINTEN FACILITY TRACTS GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN PORTIONS OF TRACTS G(& 12 DESC IN OR 4577 PGS 24 5435 JAEGER RD AVILA UNIT THREE TRACT A 13 49 25 COM AT SW CNR SI S89DEG E 671.85FT TO P DEG E 500.12FT,NO2DEG E 46 23 49 25 W 161.82FT OF S1/ OF S1/2 OF SE1/4 LESS N R/W 2.33 AC 23 49 25 E 161.82FT OF W 323.64FT OF S1/2 OF S1/ SE1/4, LESS N 30FT R/W 2.33 EASTON PARK AT COACH HC LANE LOT 1 23 49 25 E1/2 OF E 323.15F1 OF W 646.79FT OF S1/2 i OF SE1/4, LESS N 30FT R/W 23 49 25 W 161.22FT OF E 322.43FT OF W 969.22F1 S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SEI/4, LESS f 23 49 25 E161.22FT OF W 969.22FT OF S1/2 OF S1/ SE1/4, LESS N30FT 23 49 25 W1/2 OF W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SW1/ N 30FT 2.39 AC OR 1651 PG 8 23 49 25 W1/2 OF E 321.95F OF W 1291.17FT OF S1/2 S1/2 OF SE1/4, LESS N 30FT 23 49 25 E1/2 OF E 321.95F1 OF W 1291.17FT OF S1/2 S1/2 OF SE1/4, LESS N 30FT 23 49 25 E1/2 OF W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SW1/ R/W 2.39 AC OR 1900 PG 749 MOORINGS PARK AT GREY CTRACT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT FIFTEEN TRACT GC -14 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO THOS PORTIONS OF TRACT GC- OF TRACT GC -2 AS DESC IN OF 23 49 25 W1/2 OF SW1/4 Of SE1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS N R/W 4.77 AC OR 1676 PG 981 23 49 25 E 321.45FT OF W 1612.64FT OF S1/2 OF SI SE1/4, LESS N 30FT R/W, LESS 23 49 25 E1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS R/ AC ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT FIFTEEN TRACT GC -15 13 49 25 COM AT SW CNR SI S89DEG 17'14""E 1112.1 POB, S89DEG 17'14"E 59.82F1 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS RO) CLUBHOUSE & MAINTEN FACILITY TRACTS GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHTEEN ' R 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE TRACT B 25 49 25 ALL LYING N OF GOLDEN GATE PKWY, LE' 105FT, WLY R/W + LESS W 82 Packet Pg. 1137 9.C.7 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVENTEEP TRACT R CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN TRACT C MOORINGS PARK AT GREY CTRACT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP CONSERVATION AREA #2 THOSE PORTIONS AS DESC IN GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN TRACT B ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN TRACT R ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP THE PORTION OF GOLF C 3 DESC AS CONSRV ESMT #11 2685 HORSESHC ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS TRACT R ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS RO/ CLUBHOUSE & MAINTEN FACILITY TRACTS GREY OAKS UNIT FIFTEEN TRACT GC -13 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS TRACT A ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT TEN TRACT R STE 800 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE TRACT F 2685 HORSESHC VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS TRACT R 5775 OSCEOLA 1 26 49 25 COMM NE CNR OF W 430FT TO POB, S 132C 660FT, N 1320FT, E 660FT TO TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT L1 25 49 25 COMM AT SW CNR 14 GREY OAKS UNIT 15, 19.58FT, S02DEG E 84.06FT, AL GREY OAKS UNIT NINE TRAC LESS THAT PORTION NKA VERDE AT GREY OAKS CONDC GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE TRACT R ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN THAT PORTION OF TRAC' LYING IN TWP 49 RG 25 SEC 2 13 49 25 COMM SW CNR SEi 100.05FT TO POB, CONT 571.80FT N 136.66FT, N 44 DE 25 49 25 N 431FT OF W 8271 OF E 932FT OF S1/2, LYG GG, + S 585FT OF W 827FT OF GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHTEEN ' GC -17 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN TRACT R 25 49 25 COM AT CL INTERS OF GOLDEN G PKWY & E 25, N 441.80FT, S89DEG W 1C GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN THAT PORTION OF TRAC- LYING IN TWP 49 RG 25 SEC 2 GREY OAKS UNIT ONE TRACT ""A"" OR 1808 PG 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE 1 LESS TORINO LOT 37 REF 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE TRACT R-1 GREY OAKS UNIT SIX TRACT R 5775 OSCEOLA 1 UNPLATTED LANDS COMM P SEC 26, THENCE ALG N LI DEG 26'29"" E 1340.72' TO P( GREY OAKS UNIT NINE TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT THREE, A PORTION OF TRACT E AS OR 5273 PG 3586 GREY OAKS UNIT ONE TRACT ""R"" (R/W GREY WEST) GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT TRA, (ROAD R/W) 13 49 25 UNREC'D PAR A-2 F DESC AS:COM AT SE CNR W 100.13FT TO POB, W 410.0 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS RO/ CLUBHOUSE & MAINTEN FACILITY TRACTS THAT PORTI( GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN TRACT E GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN TRA Packet Pg. 1138 25 49 25 THAT PORTION OF 25 NKA TRADITIONS THE RESIDENCES AT GREY OAKS C( TRADITIONS,THE GOLF REST[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG Al -101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG Al -102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG Al -201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG Al -202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A2-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A2-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A2-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A2-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A3-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A3-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A3-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A3-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A4-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A4-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A4-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A4-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A5-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A5-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A5-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A5-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A6-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A6-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A6-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A6-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A7-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A7-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A7-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A7-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A8-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A8-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A8-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A8-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A9-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A9-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A9-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A9-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG B1-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG B1-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG B1-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG B1-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 132-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 132-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 132-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 132-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 133-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 133-102 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1139 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 133-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 133-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 134-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 134-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 134-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 134-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 135-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 135-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 135-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 135-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 136-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 136-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 136-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 136-202 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO REPLAT TRACT R-2, LESS TORINO LOTS 43-45 REPLAT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS RO/ CLUBHOUSE & MAINTEN FACILITY TRACTS THAT PORTA GREY OAKS UNIT 9 THAT PO OF TRACT ""A"" NKA TER AT GREY OAKS CONDO PH III I TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT EMILIO F CAMU! TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1140 9.C.7 TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAKI A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE TRACT R (R/W GREY OAK ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT NINE TRACT GC -9 2180 WEST SR 4 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT R N I C L F 27 49 25 LOT 9 LYING N OF SR 5-886 & L & 11, AND THAT PORTION OF STE 300 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE TRACT G (R/W) ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP THAT PORTION OF GOLF GC3 DESC AS CONSERVATION GREY OAKS UNIT NINE TRACT GC -8 LESS THAT P LYING IN SECTION 25 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE THP PORTION OF TRACT E LYI OF TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT GREY OAKS UNIT FIFTEEN TRACT R 25 49 25 THOSE PORTIONS � DESC IN OR 4577 PGS 24 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR TRACT R (R/W) KENSINGTON PARK PHASE F TRACT F ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS RO) CLUBHOUSE & MAINTEN FACILITY TRACTS ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT NINE TRAC & A PORTION OF TR H GI UNIT THREE & OTHER LANDS GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN THAT PORTION OF TRAC' 11 & 12 THAT LIE IN SEC 24 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO TRACT ""R"" ( R/W ) 13 49 25 THAT PORTION OF SW1/4 SEC 13 MORE PAI DESC AS: W3/4 OF S1/2 OF SV GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN TRACT R ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP GOLF COURSE TRACT 1; i THOSE PORTIONS OF CONSRV GREY OAKS UNIT THREE E 3C OF S 2900FT OF N 3000F TRACT E AND E 15FT OF TRAC UNPLATTED LANDS 23 49 25 OF W1/2, E1/2 OF NW1/ LAND LYING IN SEC 14 DESC A GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN THAT PORTION OF TRAC' 11 & 12 THAT LIE IN SEC 25 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO TRACT GC -1, GC -2,& GC- THOSE PORTIONS OF TR GC -1 WILDERNESS CO N I C L F LOTS 12-22 AS DESC IN OR 589 PG 95-108, LE. WILDERNESS C C UNITS 1-11 ( ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP GC TRACT 3, LESS CONSR DESC IN OR 2869 PG 249, LES' GREY OAKS UNIT THREE TRACT GC -4,5,6, & 7 AN[ PORTION OF TR D DESC IN OR Packet Pg. 1141 LEGAL4 S OODEG W 1463.37FT, N 89DEG W COM NW CNR SITE 204, S 28DEG E 1, S 38DEG 371 1.50FT, S 51 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1142 38DEG 37'E 1.50FT, S 51DEG 23' 9.C.7 a Packet Pg. 1143 THENCE S 80DEG 45'E 97FT, S 9.C.7 a Packet Pg. 1144 & 140, N 22DEG 43'37"W 220.39 OF LOTS 139 & 140, N 22DEG 43' 9.C.7 a Packet Pg. 1145 FT AS DESC IN OR 2053 PG 1671 - THENCE ALG SLY LI OF LOT 45 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1146 45, S 56DEG 00'00"E 91.98FT, E 197.57FT, S 51DEG E 118.02FT 58.44FT, N 55DEG E 236.33FT, 07FT TO A PT ON W R/W LI OF OAKS UNIT FOUR, LESS OR 1811 15FT OF N 100FT FOR ROAD R/W IN OR 2174 PG 1594, PH II (REC 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1147 TRACT C 49 & 2452-53 LYING IN SEC 24 ,S74DEG W 118.34FT S89DEG W AC OR 1959 PG 507 2.34 AC OR 801 PG 1042 30FT 2.33 AC OR 1333 PG 2377 4577 PGS 2454-57 COMM S1/4 CNR SEC 23 N 89 DEG 02DEG 21'43"E 460.34FT, S74DE TRACT M OF E 932FT OF S 1016FT, LESS 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1148 4682 PG 2725, AND THOSE 2869 PG 249 & MITIGATION AREA TRACT D POB, LESS N 100FT 18.49 AC OR ARC OF CURVE 251.19FT, N90DEG III OR 2404 PG 3183, PH I OR E 197FT, E 177FT, N 141FT W 932FT OF N1/2, LESS S 10FT & POB, S 392.13FT, S89DEG W CONT ALG N LI S 89 DEG 24'29" N 2016.61FT,E 235FT,S425.36FT, OF TRACT B RUNNING ALG GOLF 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1149 AS DESC IN OR 4360 PG 3624 9.C.7 a Packet Pg. 1150 OF TRACT A AS DESC IN OR 3424 DESC IN OR 2404 PG 3183, PH I 9.C.7 a Packet Pg. 1151 N 1/2 OF OLD GOLDEN GATE PARK - AREA #1 AS DESC IN OR 4682 PG LESS OR 2064 PG 1152 AND OR TRACT R, LESS THAT PORTION NKA LYING ADJ TO GREY OAKS UNIT TWP 49 RNG 25, LESS THOSE 1/4 LESS THOSE PORTIONS SOLD ESMT #2 AS DESC IN OR 4682 LESS THE S 2900FT OF THE S1/2 OF SW1/4 & S 132FT OF TWP 49 RNG 25, LESS ISLA VISTA ALL TR GC -2 AS DESC IN OR 4577 901 PG 1476 MITIGATION AREA DESC IN OR 1811 PG 1270, LESS THAT PORT 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1152 Grey Oaks DRI/PUD 9.C.7 N W * E S © Grady -Minor 610 305 0 610 Feet Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape, Architects U) O Packet Pg. 1153 REVISED EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT ACCESS LOCATIONS DRIVEWAY /1 RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY EXISTING BEAR'S PAW ENTRANCE EXISTING POINCIANA DRIVEWAY J] VILLAGE ENTRANCE RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY EXISTING POINCWIA VILLAGE ENTRANCE EXISRNG COACH HOUSE UNE I ( p TIO J0 EXISTING ELEME14TARY a SCHOOL ENTRANCE 711 Q DRIVEWAY #'BD OFFICE/COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY /2 OFFICE/COMMERCIAL EXISTING POINCIANA OFFICE ENTRANCE dpi (GREY OAKS DR DRNEWAY /84, COMERCK ENTRANCE COMMERCIAL ENTRANCES DRIVEYIAY ELIMINATED DRIVEWAY d3A DRIVEWAY g4 DRIVEWAY #3B DRIVEWAY RESIDENTIAL R DRIVEWAYYBB _J DRIVEWAY 46A GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY DRIVEWAY /5 LEGEND • DRIVEWAY /12 t� SIGNAL RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE GOLDEN GATE P'ARKWA`/ LANE ARRANGEMENTS 99587/096/0500 CONCEPTUAL ROADWAY FOR SITE ACCESS Rev'sW0724/2017 MASTER PLAN WITH INTERCHANGE 1 of 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1155 REVISED EXHIBIT 1 (;ONTINUED'� RIGHT OFFICE/COMMERCIAL RIGHT IN/OUT ACCESS ONLY EXISTING POINCIANA OFFICE ENTRANCE RIGHT IN/OIJ7 ACCESS ONLY Golden Gate/Airport Road interchange geometric layout developed and prepared by Wilson Miller, Inc. Exhibit produced by David Plummer & Associates, Inc. Revised by 0. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. - 2017 COMMERCIAL ENTRANCES 0 0 N 500' OACCESS ELIMINATED I— FULL of 2' MOVEMENT ACCESS 1111111 �� GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY dpi GREY OAKS DRI CONCEPTUAL ROADWAY MASTER PLAN GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IIII LEFT TURN ACCESS TO THE NORTH COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED FROM THE AIRPORT ROAD FASTBOUNO ON—RAMP TO GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY. LEGEND •O,, PROPGSEG TRAFFIC V SIGNAL LOCATIGN -'• 99587/09A/0500 URBAN INTERCHANGE Revised 07/2412017 D ETAI LS 1 2 of 2 ) 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1156 5/03/90 5/23/90 6/11/90 Revised 5/25/2000 Revised 07/20/2017 REVISED EXHIBIT 2 GREY OAKS DRI PROJECT ACCESS CONDITIONS 0) Area Development Driveway Arterial Roadway Served(2) Phase - Opening Access Conditions 1 Golden Gate Parkway West Quad — • Full access, four way intersection under six lane divided Residential 2/3 roadway. Located to align with the Bear's Paw Service Entrance. Project left and right tum lanes. • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if warranted, subject to interconnect and signal progression. 2 Golden Gate Parkway West Quad - • Prior to grade separation at Golden Gate Parkway/ Office/Commercial 2/3 Airport Road: (3) • Full access, four way intersection under four and six lane divided roadway and aligned with existing Poinciana Office Park. Project left and right tum lanes. • With grade separation at Golden Gate Parkway/Airport Road: (3) • Right tum in and out only access. 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1157 3A/3B Golden Gate Parkway 3C 4 Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway 5 Golden Gate Parkway 9.C.7 North Quad - + • Full access, "four-way" intersection under four and six South Quad 2/3 lane divided roadway. Project dual inbound and _ 0� outbound left tum lanes (subject to traffic monitoring) and separate right turn lanes.) O (D C7 • Signalization subject to Collier County Transportation Division approval and subject to interconnect and signal Mn progression. 2 • With Golden Gate Parkway/Airport Road grade 04 separation, left turn access from the Airport Road ~ eastbound on-ramp to Golden Gate Parkway will be c prohibited. (3) North Quad — Town Center 2/3 Driveway Eliminated. r J a North Quad - + • Full access, "T" intersection under four and six lane rn Office 2/3 divided roadway. Project dual left turn lanes and separate right turn lanes. • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if c warranted, subject to interconnect and signal U progression. a a South Quad — 2/3 • Full access, "T" intersection under four and six lane LL Residential/Hotel divided roadway. Project left and right turn lanes. a� • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if t warranted, subject to interconnect and signal U progression. Q r • With Golden Gate Parkway/Livingston Road grade a0i separation, left turn access from the Livingston Road z westbound on-ramp to Golden Gate Parkway will be v cc prohibited. (3) Q Packet Pg. 1158 9.C.7 6 Livingston Road North Quad - + • Full access under two, four and six lane divided 2/3 roadway. Project left and right turn lanes. Located to align with Wyndemere Entrance. Q • Signalization subject to signal warrant study. he O (D C7 6A Livingston Road North Quad - + • Separate directional access to FPL parcel. a 2/3 Mn x 6B Livingston Road North Quad - + • Separate directional access to FPL parcel. c> ti 2/3 c 0 0 7 Airport Road North Quad - 1 • Full access under six lane divided roadway. Aligned r N Residential with existing north Poinciana Village Entrance. Project a left and right tum lanes. rn M • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if CD warranted, subject to interconnect and signal r- progression.o r 8A Airport Road North Quad — + • Full access, under six lane divided roadway. Aligned �a U Town Center 2/3 with future access to West Quad (Driveway 8B). Project a dual left tum lanes (subject to traffic monitoring) andLL Q right tum lane. c a� • Signalization subject to Collier County Transportation E M Division approval and subject to interconnect and signal U progression. Q 8B Airport Road West Quad 2/3 • Full access under six lane divided roadway. Aligned with North Quad - Town Center Entrance (Driveway 8 A). Project dual left tum lanes and right tum lane 8C Airport Road West Quad — 2/3 • Right in and out only access under six lane divided Office/Commercial roadway. (3) Q Packet Pg. 1159 9.C.7 8D Airport Road North Quad 2/3 • lane,, . Driveway eliminated. 9 Airport Road South Quad — 2 • Driveway eliminated. Residential/Office/ Commercial 10 Livingston Road South Quad — • Driveway Eliminated. Residential 11 Livingston Road South Quad — • Driveway Eliminated. Residential 12 Livingston Road South Quad — 2/3 • Full access, "T" intersection under two, four and six lane Residential divided roadway. (4) • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if warranted, subject to interconnect to Golden Gate Parkway. 13 Livingston Road South Quad — • Driveway Eliminated. Residential Footnotes: 1) See Project Access Locations, Golden Gate Parkway Conceptual Roadway Master Plan, Lane Arrangement For Site Access With Interchanges, Sheet 1 of 2, dated April 11, 1989 and revised January 8, 1990, May 23. 1990, June 11, 1990, and May 25, 2000. 2) See Halstatt DRI Master Development Plan. Revised Exhibit 11. 3) Access conditions identified with east/west Golden Gate Parkway grade separated at Livingston Road and Airport Road. Should the final design and construction of the urban interchange be substantially different than that shown in Exhibit 1 with Livingston Road and/or Airport Road grade separated rather than Golden Gate Parkway, the final improvements may result in modifications to the above access restrictions. 4) If Livingston Road is grade separated at Golden Gate Parkway, the full median opening identified at Driveway #12 may be shifted north or south at the time of its construction. Packet Pg. 11670 9.C.7 5/03/90 5/23/90 6/11/90 Revised 5/25/00 Revised 7/20/2017 REVISED EXHIBIT E GREY OAKS PUD/DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER ACCESS CONDITIONS The Grey Oaks DRI shall construct at no cost to Collier County all site -related improvements providing direct access to the Project as deemed necessary by the Collier County Transportation Division including all project access points on Airport Road, Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road and all site -related improvements required within the DRI. The developer's obligation for these improvements shall include the full costs of design and engineering, utility relocation, right-of-way acquisition and dedication (if any), construction of turn lanes, acceleration and deceleration lanes, construction inspection, contract administration, testing and signalization (as needed and warranted). The alignment, design, signalization and construction schedule for these improvements shall be approved by the Collier County Transportation Division. 2. Access to Golden Gate Parkway, Airport Road and Livingston Road shall be limited to those access points and lane configurations as schematically depicted in the drawing titled Project Access Locations, Golden Gate Parkway Conceptual Roadway Master Plan, Lane Arrangements For Site Access with Interchanges, Sheet 1 of2 and dated 4/11/89 and revised 5/23/90, 6/11/90, and 5/25/00 and included as Revised Exhibit 1 and more fully described in Revised Exhibit 2 titled Grey Oaks DRI Project Access Conditions. The modified Project access is presented in Revised Exhibit 1 and Revised Exhibit 2 Changes from the original approved access are summarized below. Revised Access Plan Driveway Original Plan Revised Plan 1 Full Access No Change 2 Full Access, (Later No Change Right In/Out) 3 Full Access Full Access (T Intersection) 3C Not Included 4 Full Access (T Intersection) (Four Way -3A & 3B, Shifted East) n; .i.� r„in„+Eliminated Full Access (T Intersection, Shifted East) Packet Pg. 1161 9.C.7 REVISED EXHIBIT E (continued) 5 6 6A & B Full Access (T Intersection) Full Access Not Included 7 Full Access 8A & 8 B Full Access 8C Right In/Out 8D Not Included 9 Full Access 10 Right In/Out 11 Right In/Out 12 Full Access 13 Right In/Out Full Access (T Intersection, Shifted East) No Change Richt-In/Out No Change Full Access (Shifted North) No Change D ^tion"' ^ e�Eliminated Eliminated Eliminated Eliminated No Change Eliminated It is recognized that ultimate access control is available to local government through exercise of its police powers based on health, safety and welfare considerations. In addition to such ultimate access control, and the access controls identified in Revised Exhibit 2, additional controls could include signal system directional phasing (decreasing side street green) and additional turn lanes. 3. Traffic signals at the Project access points, as warranted, shall be interconnected and coordinated with the adjacent signalized intersections along Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway. In an effort to ensure the maximum signal progression possible along Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, certain green bands for progression purposes have been identified and evaluated by the Collier County Transportation Division. The signal progression bands identified by Collier County reflect Collier County's operational decision to provide preferential treatment to thru movements. This condition means that east/west Golden Gate Parkway thru movements and north/south Airport Road thru movements will be given preference over the Project's intersecting side street movements. 4. Permanent access to Project maintenance buildings shall be reviewed and approved by the Collier County Transportation Division. Access to the maintenance building in the North Quad shall be via Livingston Road. Full or partial access onto Livingston Road shall be dependent on the driveway location, level of service operations on Livingston Road and cross section of Livingston Road. Provided that proper turn lanes are installed and level of service standards are maintained on Livingston Road, full access shall be provided under a two, four and six lane cross section. It is recognized that ultimate access control is available to local government through exercise of its police powers based on health, safety and welfare considerations. In addition to such ultimate access control, additional controls could include signal system directional phasing, additional turn lanes and median closures and restricted turn lanes. Construction access shall be reviewed on a case by case basis by the Collier County Transportation Division. Packet Pg. 1162 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 9.C.7 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 IISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Please complete the following information, if space is inadequate use additional sheets and attach to the completed application packet. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: C. 0 Name and Address % of Ownership O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. 100% Albert O'Donnell 62.5% Patricia O'Donnell 37.5% Stephen O'Donnell 0% the Drooertv is owned by a CORPORATION. list the officers and stockholders and 1 percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. 100% Albert O'Donnell 62.5% Patricia O'Donnell 37.5% Stephen O'Donnell 0% he If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the eneral and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership 2/21/2017 Page 2 of 16 Packet Pg. 1163 GZer County 9.C.7 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, LUL, RI IVIUCIJ, UC I I CI I L, I d 11 CJ, VI PCII LI ICI J. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of �ILUIJ, 11 d L,V1PU1dLIV11, Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired 05/2016 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 2/21/2017 Page 3 of 16 Packet Pg. 1164 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL2[]170001728 -Gray yaks ORI Amendrnen! I, Aleerto•oonn& (print name), as P—denr (title, it applicable) of Uoannel kande-pes.Im. (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owneTOapplicant =contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. l have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorizeQ Grady Mi nor andAssociates, PA to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. Pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " ■ if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the is stated in it are true. ure bate STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF�� The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on / -�- (date) by o—h 0,44"1 PAY • (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as j[. rf f who is Rersonally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. . ZI STAMPISEAL Signature of Notary Public °kms Notary Public Stale of Flaitle `F Brandi L Pene9utt •• My Commissim FF 989441 "roFnd' ExWes0712212020 CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/24/14 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1165 INSTR 5266784 OR 5273 PG 3586 RECORDED 5/17/2016 1:21 PM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $2,450.00 REC $27.00 CONS $3509000.00 Prepared by and return to: Matthew L. Grabinski, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 239435-3535 After recording return to: Collier Insurance Agency Attn: Brad Stockham 2600 Golden Gate Pkwy. Naples, FL 34105 239403-6869 Consideration: $350,000.00 Documentary Stamps Tax Due Upon Recording: $2,450.00 THIS INDENTURE, made Delaware limited liability compo partnership, whose mailing address favor of O'Donnell Landscapes, l Road, Estero, Florida 33928 ("Gar day of , 2016, by Halstatt, LLC, a it by,conversion to Halslatt Partnership, a Florida general Iden ate Pari way, N ,aples, Florida 34105 ("Grantor"), in cor �a �t ohs, v Osie mailing address is: 4291 Williams U Witnesseth, that said GrAntg� for and in const&#atton�of "'`um of Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuablii�nsideration to saidntor iri,}7anii paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Iia-gr4nted, bargained, and. s4,1 ,to the said Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the fol c N ing,described land; si* e, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to -wit:`" r See Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. And the Grantor does hereby warrant the title to said land and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. The property conveyed hereby does not constitute all nor substantially all of Grantor's assets. SUBJECT TO real estate taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2015; zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; outstanding oil, gas, and mineral interests of record, if any; and restrictions, reservations and easements of record. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. WARRANTY DEED PAGE 1 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1166 OR 5273 PG 3587 9.C.7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: ri Print Name:A� (�pkiI 1M_ 0(iVA� PrintName: {7}SC31LL State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknow by Katherine G. Sproul, as CEO of Hi company, who [,A is personally kho) identification. f [Notary Seal] Halstatt, LLC, a Delaware limited liability > 1 WARRANTY DEED PAGE 2 G. Sproul, 1 , 2016, on behalf of said as Packet Pg. 1167 *** OR 5273 PG 3588 *** EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property That part of Tract "E", according to the plat of Grey Oaks Unit Three, Plat Book 20, pages 30-37, of the public records of Collier County, Florida, and all of Tract "E", according to the plat of Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen, Plat Book 33, pages 59-64, of the public records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of said Tract "E", Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen; Thence along the boundary of said Tract "E", in the following three (3) described courses: 1. North 89041157" West 390.00 feet; 2. North 00°31'16" East 2,063.03 feet; 3. North 00°38'02" East 48.23 feet to the southwest comer of said Tract "E", Grey Oaks Unit Three; Thence along the west boundary of said Tra t" ' gitb-.bQ°18'02" East 1,442.72 feet; Thence leaving said boundary South $9°)'8" East 220 00f� Thence North 0038'02" East 43( plat of Grey Oaks Unit Eighteen, ",`Grey Oaks Drive, according to the c records of Collier County, Florida; Thence along said boundary 123.01fedt along the; 41c (6f a r 6n taggeel}fial circular curve concave south having a radius of 253.00 feet th ug a c ntral angle 6f�7°51' 2-" gnd�-being subtended by a chord which bears North 67°51'33" East 121 81j e�to a point of compound curve fry Thence continue along said boundary` 6. .feet along the arc of a circular curve concave southwest having a radius of 50.00 feet through a central anglef 98°50'43"and being subtended by a chord which bears South 48°47'20" East 75.95 feet to a poinf'6n�t-we'stkl ie of Livingston Road as recorded in Official Records Book 2749, pages 697-701, of the public records of Collier County, Florida; Thence along said west line South 00°38'02" West 1,869.16 feet to the south line of said Tract "E", Grey Oaks Unit Three; Thence along said south line of said Tract "E", North 89°37'55" West 0.10 feet to the northeast corner of said Tract "E", Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen; Thence along the east line of said Tract "E", South 00°31'16" West 2,110.81 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. WARRANTY DEED PAGE 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1168 w -z TaTLcc •nIVLE wr r APOIIMWML aEsmx:tMxs nNr AaE Nor aEEOROEG OM 1M5 R(AT IINr WY K FCIRO M E PL19IX I2L'GVDS a TINS OOIMTY' TMS PUT. AS REWRDED M ns pVP111C FGM. S TIE OFFIL'41L Of/iCIION Of E Sl/BDINDFD UYOB DES'UWBEO HEREN Nq IRC N Ip CLKTIYSTANCFS s SUPPLANTED M AUIIMMY BY ANY O1NER GRAPIMC qP Gf,IIAt F1MY OL 1M Pur, WNFIIRR CRAPInC OR OCIUL NSTRUMENT RAs REPARED BY: MMEUEL H. _. P.S.M. RO. 1630 WIL M.U.ER REGISTERED ENGMEERS AxO OLID SURVEYORS JHARLES LCIXIIEF C4TOUNNFPoRRTORI0.1 FXFLUTNG Mf OEOMniMNSE xOLOELMpFIPiwPAREM WCA D AND CRTO THEEIEISEp LHAS IN MFCOUNN FROLL — FITIURF LA- CF —FIE RIGHTS µO EODUT1 &1 A— RIM LOWER COUNTY __ HE. 9J -ERZ. PUMIO FACNRY AOEWACY IN COUNTY APPROVALS IS gA' AA—C;Y -E EHj� wllG R— ERYICESti PMTMCIT OF roILIER pryNtt, gtppl OF fILg:; C. YV K�uc PE. SSEHRI PROJEGr YuuGER LOLUER _. ENGINEER ,y COS M D, I ME CMUR —1 ATTORNEY TNR f�L"'MY OF "OC— COLLIER O C TC w COLLIER COURIY ATTORNEY PU COI RL SYWt/GR THIS i RENEWED A. E COLLIER COUMY SUfi2YIXE TN53� GY Of D. RICK GRGIL COUNTY COMMISSION APPROVAL s PUT APPROKD FOR MLOROIH'C IN A REGULAR YE -W BY i)IE. BWtD �E r .Ow . OF COLD C_, O ,, RORIOA, T l 3L.CIT (EOR, THE THE CLERK Di ICIF_, JUO'G,WR! OF CgLR COUNTY, THE 6 M AIRtS S *O.��Y/L.ATYMA�Q. OWIGM E BFOLK BEARD OF JUC COUMY COMMISISroiOn FILING RECORD COLLIER coU.,. RORIDA w1T THIS PUT HAS BEEN EXAYINEO BY LIE AND THAT IT COMPUES N FORM MTIH ME REWWEUENTS OF CHAPTER I)], LAWS Of THE STATEOFiLAT-OR M FIIRIHER CEEAMI a(IN.E]pIM�K�P.UT� AD ANFOR D WLY MCOltOEOft N PUI BOOK PIEACES SL_.IHROVGH le 0f THE PUB MCORDS OF COUIER CWNN, o.a.r. d,aM Iks9lH Clot TITLE CERTIFICATION DESCRIBED AND TING THE TITLE VESTED M THE HALSTATT PARTNERSHIP.. A ROHM GENERAL P NERSHIP. AO IOLOREM LINES FOR ME PHOKR Is NOI ECN AMM D Rr ulv MORTGAGE /f RORIG BAR NUMBER JBI i6.1 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE IT R HEREBY CET THAT THIS PUT RAS PREPARED FROM M ACTML FLORIDA MFS. THE iU DATA ��MEM OFCHAR R0 SI UTESITS TCERTIFIED THAT ALL P RU "S MLL BSET -1. 0 DTHE PUT AHD PPrs NLOT CORNERS AS SHOWN HEREON EXIST OR RRAOR 10 — ICCEPIARCE p TENT MENi SIZE ICON IND M4IFRNL AFF LORMCDY11ANDANO WNUTA``sroH PROVIDED IN cH4 'R.-tJ ii..�Lop- s.—.WIISW. YMLER.�6u`fIDN�l." IMC. �� AL-Li7 CHACL MANWLSL,. u� MTFD GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN A REPLAT OF PART OF TRACT "H" OF "GREY OAKS UNIT THREE", PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 30-37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING A PART OF SECTIONS 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LOCATION MAPS INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SD'o:LMa : LHr LEE y�R��M E FORE �.NSTRUMEM RAs ACKNOwL m BEFORE ME THIS 23-- NYC, COLLIER SPROUt999U BY WOYD uTXOFIZCO GENETIUI GdCRINERME OF ME HALSTATI PARMRSHIP, — IS wkww OR HAs PRODUCED AS L" c- *&.* SIGNATURE ERSON TAKMG 'NOWLEDGEMENT lura C. Hendry NNAE OF ACKNOWLEOCER TYPE cc _OARY STA!UR\W J�1p�pl,N YNW tTSi1 TITLE OR • SE MU UBEER. IF ANY INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CWNtt OF LCOIIER jE FIRE INSIWMRT WAS ACNNOWLEO TDO BEFOFE ME MS gm Y OF 99E9.� INRDIDTFU UNDER ME NF OFM M CULL iR SPROUT BARRW COLLIER, JR., WLY AUTHORIZED CENElNL FARMER OF ME IMLSTAODUCfr PMEDMERSHl WHO IS OR Wlro WS PR J.N� SAe"URE OXAS i TaxMG ACKNOwLEDGFMRr ACKNOw1EDGER TPCD. PRIMED OR srAMPEO _�Q7j�i(7A alt • TITLE OR NK SMyRN�MISSIONCR� EXPIR 5. VOTES AND 9.C.7 DEDICATION PLAT BOOK 33 , PAGE54, cT.TE Df RORIEA SHEET 1 OF 6 WNm a couIEa KNOW iMSE RESFurs IINI HN STAR vARMFFSHrv, A ORrpA GENERAL PARERSMP, ixC OWNER OF E UND DESCRp]FD HEREON HAS CAUSED THIS— ENITEM ' GREY OAKS UFRT FOURTEEN " TO BE MACE ANO DOES EMM DEgCATE E FOLLOWING: 1. U GARY Outs RHOPENIY OMMLS A550CNiroN. INC. ALL RON —TS M WAY SAAE BEMC SHOWN AS 1aKT'A', AND E YAMIENANCE THEREOF SUBJECT TO EASEMENrs NRFAFTER SE/ FORM AND FURTHER SUBJECT TO AN USEMEM IN FAVOR OF THE ABOYF FEFCMNCED ORNER AND ITS SUCCESSORSAND ASSIGNS. FOR INGRESS, EGRESS UTILITY. ORARACC CALBE TELEIRSION, INS NUTpN OF SECUST, SrSTENS AND WlIAA M TON LIHES aPPURICxANI THERETO, AND DER MASOHARIf USES WHICH W1Y M CONWCTED OR NNED WIT UN THE READ RIGHT M WAY, v EO ALL USES 19Y SUCH Unutt PPoWDFRS —I W SUBIECT TO ARO NOT INCWSISFENT MM USE BY COLLIER COW1 OR THE COLLIER CO -I RATER -SERER OISMICT AS A C.U.E. Z. TO�OACA POWER k LMM COU .. UEATED TELEPHONE COMPAM ARO TO OTHER UTILITY �RPCTCSR' AND ALL ZIDNEESUi�N• EASE ET)(UE.) OYER. ACROSS IND UNDER ANO MAMffWNC1 OF EIR —I— FALYLI_. ALL USE BY THE ABOVE UTU_ RRO-11 SH•LL BE SUBJECT TO AND NOT INCONSISIEM MM USE BY COLLIER COU_ AND E COLLIER CWN1Y WATER -SEWER gSMKI. J. TO ANI' AIITNOMZED COUNtt fRANCNISEO G9EE N PRONOfR, ITS SUCCESSORS, ASSION.S Ary SUBADNRIES. A NOx-FxCLUSNE LNNN EASENEM (UC) OYER, •CROSS AND UNDER i-T'M FTa E PURPOSE OF CGVS1RUCliGv. — LATA, CNWUNSIE c "WUnON. NAM1ENaNCE AND OPERAITOT9 OL CAMECTREVISMN sERHCECSHALL INTERFERE WRN E FACIUMS AND SERWCE Of COLLIER W.I. COWER COUNN RATER -SERER OISMKi, RORIDA ROWER R LIGHT COMP.WY AND UNITED TELEPHONE CWPANY OR 0, PUMK 115SMOUNGCNTH F CJUDES IOF ANOTHER PUBLI1. C SUBSU-TY. THE FRANCHSEE ITS SUCCESSORS AND AsS.. 9HAI.L BC sOLEY RESPoNABLE i0R SND OUNCES. PRO_ FURTHER R TNT E EASEMENT _TED HFRflN TO =EN P ME OWNERS MFPo (VFM TUT SUCH E SEMENr 1S NO LONGER REOUMD TO BE FRONDED BY E —E COMMUNMATroNs PdJCY ACT Of SAO ACT..MARO FL3lWMWNSUNRS Tµ]].09(11, OR ATONED ILA REFUGE OTO REPLACE SYD SIATLNE. OR M E EVENT SAID ALT AND .STATUTES ARE IN ALNM — BY A COURT OR COURTS Of COMPETENT JWSDIC11CH. DISIRMT AN ACCESS EISEMENTMOVER AND ACROSS 1.11 "MSF E SOLC -E OF PERYITTHG EMERLRGY VEHICLES i0 GATH ACCESS TO ALL EXISTING UND FUTURE TRACTS AHO LOTS WTHIH MC GREY OAKS SUBOMSION. E, TO ME LTY OF NARES A T N EASE— (.E) OYER, ACROSS NJD UOLNDER RL F T ., FOR PURPoSE OF INSTALLATION AND MYMf— WIM TW COWER COUNTY TAI EN GSCNRI CANNOT BC USED INCW 1— SEWER dsiRMT -MR -1- 6 TO COLLIER COUNTY RATER_ MSIMCT -ALL SEWER ACRMES CtA,,I IEU IAUAN THIS RAVED AREA UPON ACCERTANCE OT MC N- NIS REOUNKD M ME APRINJ9LE UND -T REGULATIONS ]. i0 CIXLKR CWNtt MATER- SETYER OISMMT - A COUNN LIT— USEMENI (C.U.E) OKR, ACROSS AND UNDER ALL W TRACT 'M .MD ALL O GOWN UTUN EASEMCNS (C.U.E.) OR MF PURPoSE OF MSTATLA_ ANBD LIYIIiE [AS[ SEWER r-UTICS ANO AR ACCESS EASE - IS (UE). RIMOUT RESPONSIBILTY FOR WLMENANC£. R. TD cREY S RRI_RN OWNERS ASSOCATON, INC. .'H uaINrENANiN RESPoNSNRtm COUNTY wmI NO UNNTCHMCE REsvONSIBItm ALI u m EASEMENTS ACCESS fAYYExrs (AEJ. DRa . EASEYRTS (D C). UTHENOSCARE BUFFR EASEMEN, (LBE) ARO SYSTEMS SMY ASEIAERF (MLESPoNSI.) BIL E GREY OII(S CE IiIATER PFORERN OWNERS ASSOLI4IION, NC ME FEE OWNER OF ME LANDS UNDERLYING E OPNN4Gf UTERENrs uAIHIRANCf LAMMFNrs ANO LM'OSGVF L4UFER LAS `S NE CW _ BE ENRIIFD ro PULE NNAtl1fAEM5 W OR OVER SUR LINOS RICLWAG BUIlOT NCCFSSIRN.Y LURTED TO WI05[APMM. A T TH . . GOLF CAM PATHS DECOPA 1 WMLS AND THAT SUCH IMOROVENENR W NOT MIERfEIFt CNTHTHE USE OFOTHER C' NPCx SIO' E Po IE GUKFN II'L [FMCTS WIM -E LETTERS Of APPROVAL AND 9. MCRIHT OF ME DwNGF EASFMFMS AND YANtENAIICF FASEMENrs TO E EMCM TNT SUCH /ISFu[NIS AI+f LOGIFD W)MM ANY (FACT IABELED "W.. SHAIL I., M PERU_ i0 USE SUCH Di TRACrs UB(IEO'W ANLL M fxNi1£D 10 ALL OYER LA_ USES OF SUCH PROPEFNL WS _ MIM TNS FAI ARD MR MIME RESTGLTMNS OF MCLNM. THIS PARAGRIP S MTENOED ro CLARIFY NOT — E OEOG— MME EIERFNI. INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF FLORIDA CWNN Of COLLIER �. THE FORE4OMG iNsiftWEM WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME MIs �Y�'�r EAY OF 1 T999, BY JULIET G SMAS TRUSTEE - THE EWH COLLIER sPROOL TRUST ANO AS TRUSTEE UNDER ME WILL OF LLOYD G. xORY, TRUSTEE �ROx COLLIER. JRI. DULY AUTH041ZE0 GENERAL PARMER Cl THE PRODU IARiNERSE IP, AStl(yQjii Y - ENROLO S LYNtW, iR TEE s jt: T� .�Oa�.. C OF ALKNOWLEOGER TYPED, PRINTED OR SINAPED rMe a M! -T AE V - :1 AG 1S Y SERA. UMBER. I M 7 TET L. SPROUL A9 TROSTEC K.4. FOTN CIXUER SPROUL) A, ALL OF E TRUSTEES OF THE EIY CONYSSroN EXPNER: INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE Of ROINEA ENM COLLIER SPR WL TRUST UNDER AGREEYEM G En n. DECEMBER T969. GENERAL PANMER OL HUSIATT RARTMFSMP WIINN OF WLLER E fOREGOIO--NC MSTRUMEM WAS M:YRMWLEWEp BEFORE ME THIS µyr 998. BY INTKRINE G —... S TRUSTEE BARHOH � UNDER ME wrtt OF _R, JF. Wtv UMOM2f0 GENERAL PAR MR OF ME HALSTAR PAREHSUP. TlO�, OOORR`— HAS PFO 0 _ As IDENnrlGirou FWiOID S LYNION IRUS E 'o'er SIGHA URE OF PERSON TMI G ACKIM WEMENT K: ae. MI. KA EFNF G. SVROU. IR I U __ y9AA. y�� ER PGCh1—H. T D DitE OR RMX YRDl UMMR, rt ANY �G.�E EI L. sPFOUt As TCE M LLNMISSroN EXPIRES OF ME MUSTER OF E JINM C. SPRDIA UNDER E RRL BARON LAR'MiNRLIER,IAL, DECEASED GENERAL P HUSTATi PARMERSHw NrxEss: RNr`�M SIGN TAIL NTWSS: PRMTLWel SIGN�ypM'IMIMlpTy/ [�q� MIESS: PRMT �� yyr xTTNFsS s I nooalsJ s SIGN �In'11Kw t\M7A'\ NTHE63: PLMT (� EELL SIGN VMA A C.4MN NTNE55. SIONJ_ WITNESS: PRIM IEmr y STUN DAs,N M.1/AII� MITN[sS,(! �M��/ MN[�M1M MTNF55: PRMT MME35. PRMT 1IENAS �� LFAANN WIiRN MN��MMESB. Rrxr tLEm i Packet Pg. 1169 LEGAL DESCRIPTION er D"says B °,� e/ Ry�'na z: ntl WOc� ee ro Sec 0136'OY Ecsl .4 /«t f° o ps I on s G°Cr YnBOM Uwlnm BB 1]55 W«t tT0.09 ol°Beg�neinq o tIVJf I`weat T1I0.er real, rn°BWe 'ST w at 111T.�eN Cols F Sk I y WP ff wee OR. JR B7 a nw n Hgnt-of-u'oY line o/ Coken °o me aen«e aooa. IeoV 1117 1 iwgnai t TT1. 6 - Non" s DteMe 11 IT E`n .6 1T 1- 1.91 015 4Jr 6�99`«.aif 1o1101a'o' q .11 I"'- E«t T1978 r«r: fnence Nonnro0blf'S4 fast 0051 /«I. once « wn9 t« .....6w° `" 69 NI 454 sI9J6�..1] /eet 60 para+ i coshes le g .e c xw1�3S5J'38 Eoal 8400 /eel. ISS 6Ja�b el e5'S bTT°ona -1 el«ee y ttnlrol oalb or Ir JeV9' anB De g subl«eetl by ' 511948 Ee.l°�sss$ke I2.0 ace g on,N1 c SY58°ane 1, 9eouneo r aero G Opxa Uwt mDleen in Ise relron'y reuse« hscneee n SI9.40 h y o _ M vin9 or SJ0.00 lase t ° e,9eleet o°/ 9<'b'6ECerww ee M c teas S °Ee IN,wsryM.5.004set Mrou9nsfe yytonp«B�' J6'SPwwubewgO°`�eWeP ^ ° n Deus Sou 1TOr'11'eEosl J4J�Bi I a enc nen 8DT0] leer a arc ale wi ensu, car,cow ro e e«Iroiengk°el 212947t1 d nr9 obmnem `cnwe OiYiY410 es s c cnwo 9 ° 5s"E 89«1 Po,°^ t e«6W av ,YOw rq s9o9' seiol$1 «I, J9er «e 9 bMW.e b'«n` 0o r the rcc or'00'a8'JO'roe° umq su norinq o 6'IO°i oE^et19. 21W %e'I _0 RPoIcn91' 1' 72 Z 6x1'9 1. ]8 le°un 264809 East 31.90 «. �n r5ouln Ib'35 �6Et[esl^J�66� `'52'S0"^one Dei,N ES Pol l`Book JI, popes )6-]]1 IN. .1 0 n P scntee W Won or Toro M o96t.1 __.I s .I Co.5ittlil'9' - ,D ,A, og188'04'JY `a >O.1Iro .nam north Deep uln 4`V:9 nazi ,gM1pe olrtwar o awlrol oyb '1o185 aT'44'LU e ° q lenge y GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN A REPLAT OF PART OF TRACT ""HH" OF "GREY OAKS UNIT THREE PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 30--37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING A PART OF SECTIONS 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTINUED B)`r tn98 to TUKOg �n toyf mg�° reverse "08'15 J6 cw« u�rvmsm 9.C.7 PLAT BOOK 33 , PAGE SHEET 2 OF 6 „�� :y°ya61T �r lbs rt.Ar � a B.T°G 10) y061.49 "'T TS'IO'00'laon being s°OY 9 cigor wni sl:no°o`le ^ b1« 11)� I,1 cnwe wnrcn w0�n`n`tBY-119" Ec>r°]96'Tc9 he�ro3o p'ww' •o/ 12) ` 1]JJa/« Wonq to hounq aO9ed a el f25.0Ut arc °^9 o/c99'JB'S5" oW b.rrg NObN 6e5645`o snore enwn Dews Norm 1T08�J1 cat 90�9I / re to tW 1)11 Y Ecst I]1 >5 /R : 9 o 3.1e' a`o"s o oBHen T P '1; i lerr99 o o' v xnw GENERAL NOTES. 5) J `"T were"I 4000 lee Y East 2B 28�ee1, 9° ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET" D DECIMALS ERE - 16) NIR', In 66'36'SYD E,St 26'60 I«I t I o rongenbW ub ow I t" Z. • =PERMANENT REFEREN.E MONUMFM SET S AMPCD 1 9 P.R.M. {' 4650 e nq ^0 550.00 %ea S�ou� or 2159'09' one bn'nq` O = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT FOUND STAMPED I,y] S E«t 1 121e�eel: P.R.M. /4650 8) = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT - STAMPED P.C.P. 1d 11 9) a y540�e9°eiee a kwgen— circolor cww concow to ne scorn no 9 AND WILL BE PLACED IN ACi.ORDANCF O SEE,- 1] .091 (6). n, 111 Y4TIY ^n0� oaueNmea'DY o cnoM rin FLORIDA STATUTES 25. Tt`i`rJe �S"9Eoat J6T0 IRR I. ° an Cry Ooke - SET IRON PIN & CAP STPMPED LB -4J. Td' LONG n° Iwq Inc Wuneory W aoro h Weng Inv sou ry I sero wey J. ALL LINES ARE RAD01l TO CIRCULAR CURVE UNLESS NOTED F'ey 0e " .R." NWGTED NOT RAMAL. Imo« a tor,genl p1 Wmub" a saw to :ne 4. PP.O.C.O.B. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 51'09' one being .= POINT OF BEGINNING C.U.E. - COLLIER -1 UTILITY EASEMENT 2) U.E. = UTILITY EASEMENT wl 58.34 tcet obn9 I D.I. DRAINAGE EASEMENT o" a:nq atm ^'u^off 9.'ret "` E. MAINTENANCE EASEMENT orc`al «ge 1 TD.E. - TEMPORARY DRAINAC'E EASEMENT J4'19'11Y I EoaLtr'B.J ee ore ..c m T.A.E - TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT Quin 32 « q ry W sae lacy OOna UN, P.B. - PLAT BOOK, P - PAGE 1 n on M boo G.C. = GOLF COURSE In Won^esei uM IN— r«I to the Pam of g 9 O.R. OTFICWL ECORD BOOKU �M1S«Port qI T„. CLUG� 5 L P.R.C. = POINT OF REVERSE c RIATURE 'be0o P.C.C. POINS OF COMPO " CUT ATURE wry IRP w .aa a L.B.E. _ nen« okeq `the °Wuceery ka Une M. < 1) , r°North `eoBew'a1Js9407 12 e « 1 W,_,r, WC°nlrol °. oT 199 `wJJel 0H I ,!_; �E'J2EUaenwmg° sue�enaea544 In 61 f 11M. fi Mef o shwa ore wl circa urw ry I«f <en I.nM1, °OJ22' n, Dy ° OJ0.00 b �ne 3Y� mugs o 1629J' ee�I636 heal �B�]6 iorgeMnlmlSa°nr`iNrcuo : nco"VOveblo«JeE ey Ncn 62eJ0 �l n'9C2J'W°w«I`"e59.331 reN b 1 5point ace+ aatl r w ors rtn 4825'55' fear 209.II /cel. n989'SS'W' EoaleT02 OT I.cecry o 1 -1,w«1 I]o.72 r«I M p ,n 1 «ro eY oa:a obey Inc W°naery e/ «la Or, oel:a we Tan«n ,n In. Taw 9 a,. WaeW W `;° so�m 00'g'rlo' w«1 10. e°sdo.D3o'r«i°`1,ww°wpp,.,`i`� on°b°eP`To s'.`�e-WeTe ern9`a° i� a:e i1y"P"� aePronq P ) re P501n 03W ]'4Y5West/ ]I Mel; p)oc"e ale 4L0..1$ loles5toulIo`x5nnIMa8w al`JB.,J4°I1ar�1 S6o 615"fe'1'eleneae1, r°nwy1`a9I2 6""9q I«J2e 39I«III. c6)102e180InP anpy" ° -1 V eaglminq .1 IN, Par«1 neem 5, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS OF RECORD ETCSEQ,, PUBLIN IC RECORDS OF COIIC� RECORD OLLLLIIER COUNTY. FLDB� 1 6. NE CENTERLINE OF PAVEMENT RANGES IN ELEVATION FROM A LOW OF 10.14 TO A HIGH OF I I.. PER DESIGN PLANS. THE A EPAGE GROUND EI -110, LAND IS APPROXIMATELY 10.00 WHICH R NATURAL NSURAN T E LAND , WITHIN FLOOD ZONN X AS PER FLOOD INSURANCE NATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL BER 1006] OJ85 D GTED JUNE 3 1986. ALL f"1929. OMS ARE BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC VERiICgt WTUM, TE I REFER TO BOSTNCU� NT EDITION. PS ARE SUBJECT i0 CHANGE, PER DESIGN GLCULATIONS(( aOUTH )FLORIDA PERMIT) IDU YEAR J DAY ZERO "TNIE. LFLF OORELNASTION (FTf NCV�DJ 1 0�' MAVIMI3M RECOMMENDED ], OFFSET P.R.M.'S ARE RADIAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. Packet Pg. 1170 � ' a soNL , .Too r=o S N F E T 6 ON T6 r ix�iITwY 6E ram0 IMI aZe-A ods nAs W ' was.OESc xE.PEiN .4m ND pgOuwTANCLs er wPPwnm M AOIIgPoIY 9Y ANY on NR DRMMC dt ipN of nA: PIAT. MIE02R —ND pP DWYIAL REGISTERED J20G EY rS AkD' oau"aaso amnas PLAT BOOK --'Z, PAGE (p� GREY OAKS UNjfT FOURTEEN SHEET s OF 6 A REFLAT OF PART OF 7[o, .. 11 Y OAKS \ UNIT THREE", PLAT BOOK 20, PACE S 3C-37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING A PART OF SECTIONS 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA N iMN./, � �� D1tEY MR LM IMFF I: i¢ NOT 11AT110 NOT PLATTED POW OF 9.C.7 CONTAMMG 4.95 AQZ1- C- 1 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT SE CORNER OF SECTTON 24 Packet Pg. 1171 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE TRACT 'GC -6' (PIAT - 20. °ACEs 3p TNRN 37) GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN a.M�n ai<ios�m « a�T6szw:bs A REPLAT OF PART OF TRACT "H" OF "GREY OAKS Rr.Ab UNIT THREE", PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 30-37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A BEING A PART OF SECTIONS 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA 361.25 CURVE TABLE P.R.C. TRACO ' G C- 1 0' - M.E. B9'S5 IAl ' 1 , � \\ _ ,m6 �p,5•_-PR 1 • o•W W'H'STw. FR W (OE LwF 5 _ JO' EeSEut Kaa'Jsm•w 9J) \ \\ ro, JJ'r;Jyp aNr OF mew 1-. 0) J9' 11' 1-' .14 44J''' 4..44 S:S'1JI 1W a8 f10.18' 66 'l95GWW..eg4' 884.0' O 06..1fi561• ' IiSr8 B'E. Z P.R.C. 11:z' J . 1JJ' 21,21 ' 0:p zze'' 90.8]' NS:JJS6iJ1TTCE. K1rs5srE. i30.ro'2111-, 3035' 118'1 W 888.93• \I JU..29' x OB'JO'E. :fiT05'18•E. S.�iS .�' i8 �9p.05 16 110:x' w 3w: m' 15.00' 24 9'59' 2-.": 84x'19 W w o N 21.1 B' - -2 4- 1JsiB JT w. 'J6'W. . 6'J4'4!'W. .68'JO'44'W. 5'56-rJ�g•W. 1J 41'500' B8 54 r 061 S1 - 00.18-20' 141 IBJ: 14' 1) 0 4 .J66J689'' 10):0' 4- 4 10' sbS6a' J6866' ; 604- \ Q) r' I I m I I t i. t9r ,s e:5o'u•rB'E. �y�R co, ` �A, ryp .8'xo9 1 ]1' 9 8 6 4 r' I 0.' J1 ' J2 35 J 81515'N011' I N CO 951u09689)0.. 49 1r''' 0.TRI CT '0 " o 1 1142'40E rr"'EwwEE.. tm rs 0 ` wr re 5.69'0-2'-2521. O.E. AND \JJ M.E. >Q ii I Cl ' 10J CIRC)\'( 4J B�OT00 Q. -- PLAT BOOK b!l , PAGE SHEET 4 OF 6 9.C.7 I I I ^ 1 CURVE TABLE H I I I I I I I IAl ' 1 OEt,a �1'''J156'• I I l a l Ta. 1 9J) NG C5NY:6g609R'1=Ogl''.B4499FSYM''wwWwP.... 013.0 z5211.06606 3 I6 1' 5Y 01Y0 1-. 0) J9' 11' 1-' .14 44J''' 4..44 S:S'1JI 1W a8 f10.18' 66 'l95GWW..eg4' 884.0' O 06..1fi561• ' IiSr8 B'E. 55ro: 12 o• 0'ro9 3s's 11:z' J . 1JJ' 21,21 ' 0:p zze'' 90.8]' NS:JJS6iJ1TTCE. K1rs5srE. i30.ro'2111-, 3035' 118'1 W 888.93• 96' 166.01' JU..29' x OB'JO'E. :fiT05'18•E. S.�iS .�' i8 �9p.05 16 110:x' w 3w: m' 15.00' 24 9'59' 2-.": 84x'19 W 61.49' 23996' 64030' rf'zlzi 21.1 B' - -2 4- 1JsiB JT w. 'J6'W. . 6'J4'4!'W. .68'JO'44'W. 5'56-rJ�g•W. 1J 41'500' B8 54 r 061 S1 - 00.18-20' 141 IBJ: 14' 1) 0 4 .J66J689'' 10):0' 4- 4 10' sbS6a' J6866' ; 604- WSJ845E. 1i9s4YY1 .2J .. 1 11 2..: .18:.1- -0. 1-2 .8'xo9 1 ]1' 9 8 9W -- SW41'EE. 2J6 J1 ' J2 35 J 81515'N011' 114 951u09689)0.. 49 1r''' J?0I>-24J819.:..1B4988I0''' 1 1142'40E rr"'EwwEE.. 105r11'39,''0'19OJ-285YB3B''''5J-2''J411S1Y431''" a %OB 0.6) >Q ii 5SSS0N11W1�S58''OJ144T85'o3tlJ0 W 'Y,0'0 10 4111TE51 ' 10J 4J B�OT00 54 '55 ea 111 5.4'5 1•-21',. SJ4']826E OT40'S� .52 26.41 52.19 I I I I I 9.C.7 I I I ^ 1 I H I I I I I I I I n I I l a l I i s -- - - - - -- -- --__--------)003- 14 �'» W TRACT \ - 5660/'-21'21 5.11OJ� E \\ i o i 8 / t9r ',,W. \ pj TRACT "NGC-6r"MIR m.\l `est 1.R z°Rtr P.ccd•\ �, a i a i o ro,E. R __- l\ T R A C r ' 0C- 10 \� TRACT 'D" L.D.B., C.U.B. k D.B. I I I I I I I O.F. Ax0 u.E \ A�, ^ \ SWM VHF rRnC!'M Gfv Pixy UMI MRF, 241 30 -- - - - - -- -- --__--------)003- 14 �'» W TRACT \ - w a i - - - p0' ---21 5.6109'15',. / tm rJ / 4l Sf E' N1J'OJOS21 - - - - - - j \ M A C L I N E \\ of SEE E E r L-_-__--' o,m a I zo' B.f. R ME- K119t35�W I tm a I m a� AViICL •IIIFAE MAY EE A0011KKUE RESRRIC91OR5 ON, APE WT FEroROEO P ,C_ ' • " ss. oN n9s nA, - - eE - m - ROBUC REDS w Ixrs couvn.• INS PIAT, AS RflbRDED W IIS QRIPIIIC FORM. 6: ,RE Ofi1LNF OEPICIrON a THE su¢onwEB tyros OESGttIBm NEIb]N Agro Wiu w Np aRcuuscrAeEs eE ANIspW11' m RA' OMW OPAPMC OR OAJ,AI PORN OP IRE IYAT wxEMW ORAp11C t suPPIArRm x e.R.c.� ORO AL Qq TRACT G C - 1 I MSi 1 W 1 \V ` \ .m re 1 'Q10• u.r. --� / � \I K5� roO? f. wr s IL R+uMENT -11.LL. w1P EPA 8 IL C50M1LLE� P 5. 11 0. 4110 I \I I 1 mi 9r Y torn a q. E`5aNEERs A.vo p s RVEVOR.6 -2300 eArLEY IAA, RPoRi NAMES,. Ar Al COWER COUNTY, FtOPoDa w n � \ l , MATCHLINE � �ti Opi �3 •P°q1 ------------- T T E S H E E T 5 - ---------- -- \ Ei' Packet Pg. 1172 I ` I yRACTI"E' I I I TRACT 'D" L.D.B., C.U.B. k D.B. I I I I I I I - POINT OF BBCDwm I I 1 I I I _ INT .;.n9'J1'ss'E -----._-__-- 641.81' I --I \ Im uE \ I I I I I I �'» W TRACT TRACT -IS- weeggrTTo SOM F. AY AUW - ---------- -- \ Ei' Packet Pg. 1172 TRACT `GC -8" (LS. k M.E.) 69 160.00• JTJ-e IDS II• 70 8-90.°0• 91`0702• 10216• 31.55' 10x26' 93.71• 271.31- S69Y 8-W. SIZTZ2rW. CURVE iABLE SHEET 5 OF 6 i i Jf 246.00' 91'OJ'OY 39i.11' M 156.00' 1711.59• 11.26' GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN S4Z11'1TW. Slll-FW. NO. LA RADIUS ;2sm• DELTA 21'3 W' ARC u'si i�NDfw1 CHORD 1).18' SCJ. ' CHORD SCAR/NL S44i•91£SF. A REPLAF OF PART OF TRACT "H" OF '"GREY OAKS / 2 +D.OD• I3 -'IT' 1oe.eo• 1&6.92• 1&2J• suIII.16W >' UNIT THREE", PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 30-37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF \ SJ549'?6E. a.00• 1000' 71.02, Bf•O2'JS• 5128- 56s8' Jose' IB.- .- 3).98' S -14'w. S.871J'11•W. BJ 100.00' °658'58• 21.37' 84 210.00• 81•SJVI• 100.16' o COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, A BEING A ART OF SECTIONS 24 AND 25, \ 5 6 60000' 600.00' 2795.11• 01Y9'25 28988• 9.rr• 1 ]50• 286.10• 9:36• &n• NM XJ .. Ns7,o•rrw' .10' I.M' IM..71' 26616• M.71' ISx3J' TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA m8- 17 7 B 60000' 600.80' r29'J5 716`08- 1 3P 2&11' M.95 I-" 6..M' 2&21' .6 ,-."W. .JB')2'JrW -M '14E. .61'OI51•E. N.91'55 -V 94 300.°0' 5757`07` 10311' 95 205.00' 18540'55• 664.16' 9 10 259.00' 210.00' J51J'Ir 6W i6XY 16x11' 2)1.09' 84.10' IM..18- 163.93• 258.16' S. 14 S.3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ G 98 200.00• 051'2r MoT 99 IIS.00' 71'98.11 8160' .BS' 101.6)' 1973' 11 10.OJ• )5,'09.35 10762 1],.36• 71.91• N51)'l'C. BBO.°0' 101 1.10' 64'50• ,.7.10' 103 110.°0' 6102'16• 301' 1199.55' 21656' 7.71' IJ5.9J' N. -7-00W. N.7C30•JB•w. 8-2 )J 25.00' 600.00' B&12YM' OS53'15 9819• 9316. 71.25• 91". 16.67' 9x06' KOSM'SSE. M A T C H L / N / �. )1 )S 2]6.00' MOO' JS)1.Or J5)J'IY 160.09' 44711' 82.11' 131.86' M.22' 144.89' N)359'05W. 5.14']0')1'E. tot 16 LaTN / P.F.C. LOT 18 •: 16 iB 705.00' 1108.00' 6715')4 JE)J•,r 210.6.7 ,1152' IJ434' 22].03' 0. - 125.Ji• S.JT)4')4"W.------- 5.14'M'11•E S E E ----��- �//-�� -�� / S H E E T \ �\��0 '� 19 21 80.00' 80.00• :710.16 TJSYf 21259' 9.52' 11066' 200.15' M.JS 4'26' S.JT26'15•W. .2T24.16W. Q \T (m I9 / \ 5 IIM6'OTw 109.7)' L6 NB716'Lrw 120.08• 21 22 IB0.00' 110.00 ZOrof'JS 3r14ror 6J. UJ• M81' 31.86' 67.75' 92.51' 111.10' S.61'1,36•W. S.iS59ro5E. w.+ i '1mW.LL 13 24 132.00' 626.00' Jrl4 ro.T -M-I6 IOI.1B' 9119' 1 05.05 ' 101.x7 IBM' 9110' 1 S. 5'59100•£. S.05,0,1S3'W. t I (OT 15 ^ TRACT `GC -8" (LS. k M.E.) 69 160.00• JTJ-e IDS II• 70 8-90.°0• 91`0702• 10216• 31.55' 10x26' 93.71• 271.31- S69Y 8-W. SIZTZ2rW. a SHEET 5 OF 6 i i Jf 246.00' 91'OJ'OY 39i.11' M 156.00' 1711.59• 11.26' 250.84' 35).11' 1730' 31.19' S4Z11'1TW. Slll-FW. TS 164.0°' 8059'19• 251.82' 1, 145.00' 8721'11• 221.92' 110.01' 21299' 119.69' 2001 s' SMSB'?TW. S-12'2rW 13 BOOS 5727.11• 1211• 76 120.00' ) 6'Sr 596.21' 1451' 0.59• 1001.01' 129.80' S -12-2X. S.IMIO•S4'W. ., Jl 220.00' 2`091 9275' 721.11' 17.0' 91207 Sr -45W >' BMO ' 418• 2 70 117 x50' 4.6'218S=0R.22000 28 )' 11131'91.81' SJ549'?6E. I 81 200.00• OB'09'Sr 18.50' B1 ZOo.W, 1r09'OY 150.62• B.IB 14.27' • MM- 1+2.09• S.SSSr1I•E. 1J5)Irol•f. I BJ 100.00' °658'58• 21.37' 84 210.00• 81•SJVI• 100.16' 1.20' 21.16' M..21. 1]5.25' SOSIOroI'E. S.,Z37'22T N BS 210.00' 95fJY)1• 10.07' B6 210.00' 39'18'11• 113.89' 12. M' 17.19' 76.05' 1'291' STOIJroZE. 5.5117'- BrE. BJ 210.00' OSST'T5 1.20' BB 200.00' B4'/T'Is" 29x81' M TOO.w S656'JY )15.91' .10' I.M' IM..71' 26616• M.71' ISx3J' SBI'Sl'S8•£. 111'18'O3•E. S61.OS'SY£. 4 90 10000' 631.55 66.OJ' 91 100.00' 1620'15" 91.96' 3x12' 65.71' 18.81' 91.16' SSS10.12•E. 11731'20•£. r` 92 80.00' 10<'I6'IY 15.59' 95 210.00' 6728'10' 595.18' 102.89' 2631' 1561.97' 115.°1 .61'OI51•E. N.91'55 -V 94 300.°0' 5757`07` 10311' 95 205.00' 18540'55• 664.16' 16615' 79°.61' -1110.90' 109.50• N.2&19'JFW. NM -11-3 3-W UU11TTIII 96 00' 500. 45'18 '21• 593.11 97 250.00' T51.2r 109.01' 108.6 ]' 1&5.15' .07 20x°0• SISJT15R'. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ G 98 200.00• 051'2r MoT 99 IIS.00' 71'98.11 8160' .BS' 101.6)' 1973' N.24'19RMI•W. 4•IJrorE M27M 4E. ^' , 181.12' 100 AM, IF 12'16 5).60' OI 71'5]55 116.09' M.55' 56.81' )10.70' 2)1.51' NSJ19'16E. N.074.21"E. I BBO.°0' 101 1.10' 64'50• ,.7.10' 103 110.°0' 6102'16• 301' 1199.55' 21656' 7.71' IJ5.9J' N. -7-00W. N.7C30•JB•w. V� woiw� 101 170.00' 231'JO'JS' BBB.9J' -156.01' 19679' N.BJ IrE. - P R.L. LINE TABLE � I M bb L;A. BIm;A9 o;:mA,W LI so11e•Oz•w. u.w• 1RACr -Jr, C.U.R., D.R. & U.F LJ Ste. BOYw. IS.lw• I I ri7ACr 0 IR• v 5.81'�� 14S09•J1'IrW I I Q 5 IIM6'OTw 109.7)' L6 NB716'Lrw 120.08• a - - - - __ 1, co w.+ L7S51I9•Irw. 80.95'6 L6 S09'31'S5w 161.71' or I .06 T 'R', CUT , R.R. & U.R. R e c r ' G C- I y - (9N -6'11'W. 74.47 10 71';'°I'W. )10.18' t I I I "Moi v L&R.. IGUS & D.6 Ci I I S09'3'ITw 1&9J' LI} SBTSS'S6W. 11212' I I a I I J SBT55'SSW. 215' LI! N.B755'5r•.. 11212' � LIS .9033'36£ 8-ZL48- L16 N. M12'1TW. 20.37' 20.00 161'17'20 AOIWZ` 'llm w BE AODIIANLL RfS8RiO6 MONS ROT IQCC16m ON iM5 MT TNAT w, 6E FOINO N ME 1V91C L3mR09 OF m CpMTV.' .r IM6 PIAT, AS PEL1CImFD N ITS slI- -. 6 TK DROLL CFACIOV OF IK 51RONEED 11 0 0®8® Tow. /M , o N Ip CRCU6IARCES E SL9RANICO N . AUMOOIT M AM OVER ONARG OR DE1IN T01Y ai IK RAi, Ili[IIER OWglO OR OETTA6 `�fyA. INIS LNSiRUMENi WAS PREPARCp 01S MICHAEL H. -L. P.SM. N0. 4650 -mREGISISALL ENONEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS )700 &TREY LANE AT AIRPORT ROAD 19"R NAPLES. COLLIER COUNTY. FlOR101 TRACr 'GC -11 O.E. tr M.E. �9_ / F IAT 11 mN LOT II- / LOT 10 7" 107 12 4 = IS- D- 1't 'A, Hyl IB.22r.,' LOT 9 !y ` FASEMEM go I ° LOT a (ss)w TW N87! ,( \ Yv K2 IGSEAR ! ^� dyg�LOT 7 WT6 �YV LOT \B6. \ J.5'�.y.M�f,1SRFASFM� 1 IS' P.I(.C.1 kB \/ LOT I RI ,y1'S;�S.B9'11'SB•E. I h 61' 20141' _I W LOT 3 sI F a CHLINE eI 5.412,.E I6"� LOT 2 g )-.1.56E. N� •.56'E. - E T 6 __ 2.55'I ^ I 1.5' J r A CT "G C - I I 1.8 Loll pE k ML 'I o• umm FASEYEM 9.C.7 PLAT BOOK 33 , PAGE (03 a SHEET 5 OF 6 i i V I I I I I I � ., 0 Q aruT >' III rB/Cl" CU.R., 1).R. & D.R. i I I I }I R 7 I I N I I = miffIRR CUM l RL I r` � o. UU11TTIII Q IIFASELIENiI _ I I I 0 I N I I J RAff •Gw �RX. C.U.E. & D.R. d I I � I M GRRT OIbS DR7 ffU RICR'j' OF . YIRISS 1RACr -Jr, C.U.R., D.R. & U.F T. I I ri7ACr 0 IR• v I I Q I I a - - - - __ 1, co w.+ or I .06 T 'R', CUT , R.R. & U.R. I I t I I I "Moi v L&R.. IGUS & D.6 Ci I I +a I I a I I � 7Rac7 Wsc-IR• I I Packet Pg. 1173 B/1.00' Ne1,r•srw U A Q SCALE Packet Pg. 1173 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN A REPLAT OF PART OF TRACT "H" OF "GREY OAKS UNIT THREE", PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 30-37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A BEING A PART OF SECTIONS 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA uq TRACT A• IIIb _ _ _ _ — — — — — — —9�..... EY ion OF ADr TIUCI •S'. C. UJ D.& 3 n.6. I—--------------------T-9T—------------------------------ -- --- g? (KNtT 110' F.P.L. EASEMENT y O.R. BOOK IBS. PACE 815 NOT FLATTED ^W, TRACT •OC—!R• DF t M.E �4 ¢ Blayp ea � V MT%L 'nIFIE WY w A00'IION4 aE51RC11OM5 THAT AIE NOT aECoaOm 011 T65 PIAT T91T wY BE FDUlO N TE PUNIC RECOIPOS w INS OWTT..' TNS PLAT, AS RECOaOED N ITS ORAPI6C FO"M. 611E OFrICW. OEFETKN OF TIE SINU W16S OESCa6E0 IEIETI AMO WAL N N) LBK:UMSTAAC6 E SUPPIANIFD N AUTpMY BY AAwNY OTIER TNAPI6C' OR GETTAL FplY OP TE PUf. W1IEINER CRr1PMC OR OIf.IIAL -5 TRU AAS PREPaREO BY L'RTL NA.U. P.S.M. N0.A— M- 650 MLSONMILL[R x TE 3200 BMLFYUONEE T AKPOR It-)IRVEY0R5 NNPLES. COLLIER —1• 10WA -- `10'UN TRACT •ac —1 R• PLAT BOOK 33 , PAGE b SHEET 6 OF 6 UNPLA77ED LAND 9.C.7 CURVE TABLE NO. RAON/S OEL IA AFC % CEN) OMOaO 9EAR0I0 300.00' SM9. )T' � I I IM.6.' 18.1]' 199..0' 390150• 23N' 776,76' 616' S.1525'II W. MBJ'10M;.. 5 5.2.00' 6 200.00' LOTS 371160' 160.01' 185.11' B<.80' J6..Jl' 155.83' SEE SHEET 5 � I I --------- 169.13' 158.81' ---------�- ---------- ----- ----- M A ---------- P.R.C. T C ---- H L I N E ---- I 305.16' '21-W -21' 1'W. 11 500.00' S 5800' J9'16'SB' 9'16'56 N2B1' 311.01' ?D' D.E. t M.E. LOT 2 N.69'S9'JYW. .6559'JYW. IJ 230 .00' 11 500.00 6 T09.0.• J95.J7' 111107' 208.6]• =.... 385 IS' LMiff 15 300100' 6 210.00' Il10.•16'12' STSIror 162'18'10' P.ac. Im 13• 1761.97' IO2B9• 190.67' 11308' —11' —19•J6E. SJ1'SS'SSw. .61'0IM.. I— — — TRACT •aC-ll• I LOT Of TRI CT •OC -Il• D'urnm 2000 OE tr ME F.AS'FMENf / Ser+r' v.R.C. fff uq TRACT A• IIIb _ _ _ _ — — — — — — —9�..... EY ion OF ADr TIUCI •S'. C. UJ D.& 3 n.6. I—--------------------T-9T—------------------------------ -- --- g? (KNtT 110' F.P.L. EASEMENT y O.R. BOOK IBS. PACE 815 NOT FLATTED ^W, TRACT •OC—!R• DF t M.E �4 ¢ Blayp ea � V MT%L 'nIFIE WY w A00'IION4 aE51RC11OM5 THAT AIE NOT aECoaOm 011 T65 PIAT T91T wY BE FDUlO N TE PUNIC RECOIPOS w INS OWTT..' TNS PLAT, AS RECOaOED N ITS ORAPI6C FO"M. 611E OFrICW. OEFETKN OF TIE SINU W16S OESCa6E0 IEIETI AMO WAL N N) LBK:UMSTAAC6 E SUPPIANIFD N AUTpMY BY AAwNY OTIER TNAPI6C' OR GETTAL FplY OP TE PUf. W1IEINER CRr1PMC OR OIf.IIAL -5 TRU AAS PREPaREO BY L'RTL NA.U. P.S.M. N0.A— M- 650 MLSONMILL[R x TE 3200 BMLFYUONEE T AKPOR It-)IRVEY0R5 NNPLES. COLLIER —1• 10WA -- `10'UN TRACT •ac —1 R• PLAT BOOK 33 , PAGE b SHEET 6 OF 6 UNPLA77ED LAND 9.C.7 R O i R N 2 a) N I- 04 04 J a rn M O O r m .Q Q a LL C d E t V �1 a C� G V W1 a Packet Pg. 1174 CURVE TABLE NO. RAON/S OEL IA AFC % CEN) OMOaO 9EAR0I0 300.00' SM9. )T' 895JroT I '51.15' IM.6.' 18.1]' 199..0' 390150• 23N' 776,76' 616' S.1525'II W. MBJ'10M;.. 5 5.2.00' 6 200.00' J9'16'SC .531'15 371160' 160.01' 185.11' B<.80' J6..Jl' 155.83' M6P59'JYW. 11'IJroI'[ 7 115.00' 8 .10.00' 11'38'19' 411V6' 181131' 151.60• 10..67' 19.55• 169.13' 158.81' N.TT06'11'E. MS Io -46'E. 9T58.00' 10 216.00' B9'SYOY 89'5 r 101.75• JIBB6• 25].18•515• 215.51' 305.16' '21-W -21' 1'W. 11 500.00' S 5800' J9'16'SB' 9'16'56 N2B1' 311.01' 178115' 10..16' 336113' 30190 .' N.69'S9'JYW. .6559'JYW. IJ 230 .00' 11 500.00 , T31.1T ISIB'I1' T09.0.• J95.J7' 111107' 208.6]• =.... 385 IS' 21'19vrr.. NISJI.10'L 15 300100' 6 210.00' Il10.•16'12' STSIror 162'18'10' 303..1' S931B' .5.59• Im 13• 1761.97' IO2B9• 190.67' 11308' —11' —19•J6E. SJ1'SS'SSw. .61'0IM.. R O i R N 2 a) N I- 04 04 J a rn M O O r m .Q Q a LL C d E t V �1 a C� G V W1 a Packet Pg. 1174 TPODIICOCR plannino-enoineering Traffic Impact Statement O'Donnell Nursery Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) Prepared for: Peninsula Engineering 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Bonita Springs, FL 34105 Phone: 239-403-6700 Collier County, Florida 03/12/2018 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee — $500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee — Small Scale Study — No Fee 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1175 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. %%% N `�QP'�,�G•E•SF CC0�: No 47116 '.-�r,� • X O'.•• S TATE O F �i �s • O R C? ONA11110��, This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Norman J. Trebilcock, PE using a SHA -1 authentication code. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed, and the SHA -1 authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 9.C.7 1 Packet Pg. 1176 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Table of Contents ProjectDescription......................................................................................................................... 4 Trip Generation —Traffic Conversion Analysis................................................................................ 6 Trip Distribution and Assignment................................................................................................... 7 BackgroundTraffic........................................................................................................................ 10 Existing and Future Roadway Network......................................................................................... 11 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis............................................................ 11 Site Access Turn Lane Analysis...................................................................................................... 12 ImprovementAnalysis.................................................................................................................. 13 Mitigationof Impact..................................................................................................................... 14 Appendices Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan.......................................................................................... 15 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist.......................................................................................... 17 Appendix C: Collier County Ordinance 2007-40 - Excerpt........................................................... 24 Appendix D: Collier County PUD Monitoring Report - Excerpt ................................................... 26 Appendix E: Grey Oaks DRI — Conceptual Roadway Master Plan ................................................ 28 Appendix F: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition......................................................... 30 Appendix G: Turning Movements Exhibit.................................................................................... 37 O t9 T) x rn N I - r.. 0 0 0 ti 0 N J d rn Cl) m c 0 r ca .Q Q. a LL c (D E ca a r c m E a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 13 Packet Pg. 1177 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Project Description The O'Donnell Nursey project is a proposed wholesale nursery development located on the west side of Livingston Road approximately 1,400 feet north of the intersection of Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway and directly south of the intersection of Livingston Road and Grey Oaks Drive East, and is generally located within Section 24/25, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, in Collier County, Florida. Refer to Fig. 1— Project Location Map, which follows and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Fig. 1— Project Location Map rv, .� ;;, ,a a PROJECT LOCATION _ 8 Noo RAN,• .s -OWd . nFp'0.P�W.� Naotai IO'J D1 �. •.�M11�,10�8�d!'ti.r+ �r 1 � � . ,� � ^•� n�.e, neem . iw,,.>#mn new.,,... S � .T� � ' f w".fin,.: ,.eJp r T � ® S 6, S*nw.• ` Q' Nau'oM ' vv_la'i.: ' 4 � � w ywuus�J MwiimdiAim— - Goog Q g � HmiIW AeM run �IrY'u�plry Cfy6 •� .� The subject site consists of 2 parcels totaling approximately 31 acres in size, is currently zoned as Planned Unit Development (PUD) and is a part of the Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI). As allowed by the PUD commercial permitted uses, the project proposes 27 acres of wholesale nursery and commercial landscaping, 2.75 acres of retail nursery and 1.25 acres of farmer's market. The retail nursery is comprised of a 7,500sf outdoor sales and display area. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 14 Packet Pg. 1178 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on August 24, 2016, via email (refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting)). Consistent with the approved Collier County Ordinance #2007-40, the Grey Oaks DRI site is currently allowed to be developed with up to 1,775 residential dwelling units, 1,303,091sf of office/retail/commercial and 72 golf course holes. The approved development program associated with these land uses is shown in Table 1A, Existing Approved and Built Development Program. For details, see Appendix C: Collier County Ordinance 2007-40 — Excerpts and Appendix D: Collier County PUD Monitoring Report — Excerpts. Table 1A Existing Approved and Built Development Program ITE Land Use (Zoning Designation) ITE Land Use Code Approved Size Built to Date Size Single -Family Detached 210 1,775 du 1,159 du General Office Bldg. 710 653,453 sf 0 sf Shopping Center 820 649,638 sf 0 sf Golf Course 430 72 holes 72 holes The project plans to eliminate 2 commercial access locations (approved within the Grey Oaks DRI Master Plan); one from Golden Gate Parkway and one from Airport Road, and proposes 2 new driveway access locations from Livingston Road to serve the proposed O'Donnell Nursery project; one directional left-in/right-in/right-out access onto southbound Livingston Road (north access) and one right -out only access onto southbound Livingston Road (south access). For details, see Appendix E: Grey Oaks DRI — Conceptual Roadway Master Plan. For purposes of this evaluation, the project build -out year is assumed to be consistent with the Collier County 2023 planning horizon. The project provides a highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. The proposed development program is illustrated in Table 113. Table 1B Proposed Development Program Development ITE Land Use ITE Land Use Code 818 Total Size O'Donnell Nursery Nursery — Wholesale 27 acres O'Donnell Nursery Nursery — Retail 817 7,500sf* Farmers Market Farmers Market 858 1.25 acres *7,500sf outdoor sales and display area located on 2.75 acres. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P z 1 5 Packet Pg. 1179 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Trip Generation - Traffic Conversion Analysis The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The software program OTISS — Online Traffic Impact Study Software (most current version) is used to create the raw unadjusted trip generation for the project. The ITE rates or equations are used for the trip generation calculations as applicable. The climate and demographic makeup of Collier County and the surrounding area create a large year-round demand for commercial landscaping services. In order to account for this increased demand, a supplemental calculation was performed for anticipated additional traffic from the landscaping service. Based on client provided data, trip generation was calculated to include employees arriving on site in the morning in personal vehicles, then departing in company trucks (a total of 50) to their respective landscape maintenance projects. Similarly, the company trucks would return to the project site in the afternoon and the employees would leave the site in their personal vehicles. It is assumed there are 5 -man crews per truck and that some carpooling will occur between employees, for an average of 3 personal vehicle trips per truck. The trips are assumed to occur, conservatively, during the AM and PM peak hour time periods as applicable. In order to account for the reduced availability of the retail nursery when the farmers market is operating, a 50% reduction of the retail nursery traffic was included and is reflected in the trip generation. Based on ITE recommendations, no internal capture or pass -by reductions have been taken into consideration. The proposed PUDA development trip generation is illustrated in Table 2A. Detailed calculations can be found in Appendix F: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10t1i Edition. Table 2A Trip Generation (Proposed PUDA Development) - Average Weekday Development AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Nursery - Wholesale 27 acres 5 2 7 2 10 12 Nursery—Retail* 7,500sf 4 5 9 13 13 26 Farmers Market 1.25 acres 110 109 219 108 117 225 Commercial Landscaping** N/A 150 50 200 50 150 200 Total External 269 166 435 173 290 463 *7,500sf outdoor sales and display area located on 2.75 acres. Includes 50% reduction due to Farmers Market operation. **Manually calculated based on client supplied data. In agreement with the Collier County Traffic Impact Study (TIS) guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net new total) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 6 Packet Pg. 1180 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 information contained in Collier County 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for the adjacent roadway network is PM peak hour. A purpose of this analysis is to generate a traffic conversion equivalency between the proposed project and the undeveloped retail land use within the Grey Oaks DRI. The projects total external PM peak hour2-way trip generation is used to determine the traffic impact of the project and provides guidance as to the amount of retail square footage required for conversion. The ITE LUC 820, shopping center, was used to model the trip generation for the retail portion of the DRI. Based on the results of the trip generation, 80,500sf of undeveloped shopping center will be converted to the proposed PUDA development land uses, as illustrated in Table 2B. Table 2B Trip Generation Conversion — PM Peak Hour Development PM Peak Hour Size Enter Exit Total Proposed PUD Development Per Table 2A 173 290 463 Proposed Retail Conversion 80,500sf 222 241 463 Net Difference 1.25 acres (49) 49 0 For the purpose of this TIS, the surrounding roadway network link concurrency analysis is analyzed based on projected PM peak hour Total External traffic generated by the proposed PUDA project. The site access turn lane analysis is calculated based on the Total External trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hour (as shown in Table 2A). Trip Distribution and Assignment The new traffic generated by the O'Donnell Nursery project is assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area and as coordinated with Collier County Transportation Planning Staff. The site -generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour and is graphically depicted in Fig. 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and By PM Peak Hour. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 7 Packet Pg. 1181 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Table 3 Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour Note(s): *Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 8 Packet Pg. 1182 Collier Distribution of PM Peak Hour Project Vol.* Roadway Link County Roadway Link Location Project Traffic Enter Exit Link No. Enter/(Exit) Livingston 54.0 South of project to Golden 50%/(100%) NB -87 SB — 290 Road Gate Parkway Livingston North of project to Pine 54.0 50%/(N/A) SB -86 N/A Road Ridge Road Livingston Golden Gate Parkway to 55.0 15%/(30%) NB -26 SB -87 Road Radio Road Golden Gate 20.2 Livingston Road to 1-75 20%/(40%) WB -35 EB —116 Parkway Golden Gate 20.1 Livingston Road to Airport 15%/(30%) EB -26 WB -87 Parkway Road Note(s): *Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 8 Packet Pg. 1182 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Fig. 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and By PM Peak Hour PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION I' MAP BY PROJECT LOCATION W PERCENTAGE ENTER 30°/0 EXIT {30°/0} raw $ r Yrn+ R.•u ii . xn � t �-- 4 '` Mu�opal Anpat. .rr x. -- _ t.� w ' � r r s 1 � w► r 1 N Y n� PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION MAP BY PM PROJECT LOCATION PEAK HOUR r! (PM -290) � •tl [Ph4.87i (pm -1 16)9 u,aes roa m . .... , r•.. •a ..•.., Pi�1-2S PPI -35 � cor^eeeanrvmn:• ...1 ..T.,l.... w.rpr,.., -..X �.Ar. {Pp.�-871 c PM -26 p -13 i Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 9 Packet Pg. 1183 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Background Traffic Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate from annual traffic counts (estimated from 2008 through 2017), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2017 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the build -out year 2023. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2017 - 2023) Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate - from 2017 AUIR, 2% minimum. **Growth Factor = (1+Annual Growth Rate) 6. 2023 Projected Volume= 2017 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. ***2023 Projected Volume= 2017 AUIR Volume + Trip Bank. The projected 2023 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 10 Packet Pg. 1184 2023 Projected 2023 2017 AUIR Projected Pk Hr Peak Dir Projected Pk Pk Hr, Pk Hr, Peak Dir cc Traffic Background Dir Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Link Link Location Growth Factor w/out Project Bank ID # Traffic Rate (trips/hr) Volume Volume (�/yr)* Growth w/out Project (trips/hr) (trips/hr) Trip Factor** Bank*** Livingston 54.0 South of project to Golden Gate 1,470 2.091. 1.1262 1,656 34 1,504 Road Parkway North of project Livingston 54.0 to Pine Ridge 1,470 2.0% 1.1262 1,656 34 1,504 Road Road Golden Gate Livingston 55.0 Parkway to 1,270 o 2.0/ 1.1262 1,431 39 1,309 Road Radio Road Golden Livingston Road Gate 20.2 2,770 2.0% 1.1262 3,120 1 2,771 Parkway to 1-75 Golden Livingston Road Gate 20.1 to Airport Road 2,200 2.0% 1.1262 2,478 0 2,200 Parkway Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate - from 2017 AUIR, 2% minimum. **Growth Factor = (1+Annual Growth Rate) 6. 2023 Projected Volume= 2017 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. ***2023 Projected Volume= 2017 AUIR Volume + Trip Bank. The projected 2023 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 10 Packet Pg. 1184 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) and the project roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5 -Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County 2017 AUIR, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build -out. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Note(s): 2U = 2 -lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D =4 -lane, 6 -lane, 8 -lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future horizon (2023). The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e l 11 Packet Pg. 1185 Exist Peak Dir, Future CC AUIR Roadway Link Exist Min. Peak Hr Project Roadway Link Link ID # Location Roadway St rd Capacity Build out LOS Volume Roadway South of project Livingston 54.0 to Golden Gate 6D E 3,100 (NB) 6D Road Parkway North of project Livingston 54.0 to Pine Ridge 6D E 3,100 (NB) 6D Road Road Livingston Road 55.0 Golden Gate Parkway to Radio 6D E 3,000 (NB) 6D Road Golden Gate 20.2 Livingston Road 6D E 3,300 (EB) 6D Parkway to 1-75 Golden Gate Livingston Road Parkway 20 1 to Airport Road 6D E 3,300 (EB) 6D Note(s): 2U = 2 -lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D =4 -lane, 6 -lane, 8 -lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future horizon (2023). The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e l 11 Packet Pg. 1185 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Based on these criteria, this project does create a significant impact on Livingston Road south of the project to Golden Gate Parkway and on Golden Gate Parkway from Livingston Road to 1-75. The impact on the remaining analyzed links is not significant. All links analyzed are projected to operate above the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2023 future build -out conditions. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the roadway network closest to the project. Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — With Project in the Year 2023 Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2023 Projected Volume = 2023 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added Site Access Turn Lane Analysis Connection to subject project is proposed via one directional left-in/right-in/right-out access onto southbound Livingston Road (north access) and one right -out only access onto southbound Livingston Road (south access). For details, refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Livingston Road is a 6 -lane urban divided arterial roadway under Collier County jurisdiction, and has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. Based on FDOT Index 301, design speed of 45 mph — urban conditions — the minimum turn lane length is 185 feet (which includes a 50 foot taper) plus required queue. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Packet Pg. 1186 2017 Roadway 2023 a /Vol Min LOS Min LOS CC Link, Peak Peak Dir, AUIR Roadway Peak Dir, Dir Peak Peak Hr Capacity exceeded exceeded Roadway Link Link Link Location Peak Hr Hr (Project Volume Impact without with ID # Capacity Vol w/P*oject by Project? Project? Volume project Yes/No Yes/No Added)* South of Livingston Road 54.0 project to 3,100 NB — 87 1,743 a 2.81/o No No Golden Gate (NB) Parkway North of Livingston Road 54.0 project to 3,100 N/A 1,656 N/A No No Pine Ridge (NB) Road Golden Gate Livingston Road 55.0 Parkway to 3,000 NB -26 1,457 0.87% No No Radio Road (NB) Golden Gate 20.2 Livingston 3,300 EB —116 3,236 3.52% No No Parkway Road to 1-75 (EB) Livingston Golden Gate 20.1 Road to 3,300 EB -26 2,504 0.79% No No Parkway Airport Road (EB) Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2023 Projected Volume = 2023 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added Site Access Turn Lane Analysis Connection to subject project is proposed via one directional left-in/right-in/right-out access onto southbound Livingston Road (north access) and one right -out only access onto southbound Livingston Road (south access). For details, refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Livingston Road is a 6 -lane urban divided arterial roadway under Collier County jurisdiction, and has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. Based on FDOT Index 301, design speed of 45 mph — urban conditions — the minimum turn lane length is 185 feet (which includes a 50 foot taper) plus required queue. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Packet Pg. 1186 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Project access is evaluated for turn lane warrants based on Collier County Right-of-way Manual: (a) two-lane roadways — 40vph for right -turn lane/20vph for left -turn lane; and (b) multi -lane divided roadways — right turn lanes shall always be provided; when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left turn lanes. Turn lane lengths required at build -out conditions are analyzed based on the number of turning vehicles in an average one -minute period for right -turning movements, and two -minute period for left -turning movements, within the peak hour traffic. The minimum queue length is 25 feet and the queue/vehicle is 25 feet. Projected turning traffic movements are illustrated in Appendix G: Turning Movements Exhibits Main Site Entrance — Livineston Road — North Access A dedicated southbound right -turn lane is warranted as the project meets the multi -lane criteria. The proposed project is expected to generate 135 and 87vph right -turning movements during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. At the minimum, the turn lane should be 260 feet long (which includes a minimum of 75 feet of storage). As such, a 260 foot right -turn lane is recommended to accommodate projected traffic at this location. A dedicated northbound left -turn lane is warranted as the project meets the multi -lane criteria. There is an existing northbound left -turn lane approximately 550 feet long. The proposed project is expected to generate 134 and 86vph left -turning movements during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. At the minimum, the turn lane should be 310 feet long (which includes a minimum of 125 feet of storage). As such, the existing 550 foot left -turn lane is adequate to accommodate projected traffic at this location. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting to determine turn lane requirements as more accurate parameters become available, as applicable. Improvement Analysis Based on the results of the conversion analysis included in this report, this project's traffic impact does not exceed the traffic generated by the approved PUD ordinance. As illustrated in the link analysis and trip distribution, the proposed project's impact is significant on Livingston Road south of the project to Golden Gate Parkway, and significant on Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and 1-75. Projected traffic does not create any significant impacts on the other analyzed roadway segments of the study network. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 13 Packet Pg. 1187 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 None of the analyzed links are projected to exceed the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2023 future build -out conditions. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Consistent with the site access turn lane analysis results, a 260 foot right -turn lane is recommended to accommodate traffic at build -out conditions. The existing northbound left -turn lane is adequate to accommodate projected traffic at this location. Mitigation of Impact From a zoning perspective, given that access is eliminated on Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road due to less intensive established land uses there and this proposal does not create a net increase in development external trips as compared to the original development parameters, the prior established DRI mitigation should be deemed satisfactory. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 14 Packet Pg. 1188 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.C.7 Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan (1 Sheet) EWA ^. N R O a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 15 Packet Pg. 1189 ma.-- --- -__�_�__- v aq N r ti � t t \ � 'ti 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1190 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.C.7 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) (6 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 17 Packet Pg. 1191 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a isorksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do nut apph, or \:/A (nut applicable). Date: August 24, 2016 Time: N/A Location: N/A — Via Email People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Chad Sweet, Collier County Growth Management Department 2) Norman Trebilcock. TCS 3) Daniel Doyle. TCS Study Prepare r: Preparer's Name and Title: Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PF, Organization: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Address & Telephone Number: 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202, Naples, Fl 34110: ph 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s) Reviewer's Name & Title: Chad Sweet, PE Collier County Transportation Planning Department Organization & Telephone Number: 239-252-2491 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Peninsula F,ngincering Address: 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Fl, 34105 Telephone Number: 239-403-6700 Proposed Development: Name: O'Donnell Nursery — SIP Location: West of Livingston Road, east of Grey Oaks and approximately 970 feet north of Golden Gate Parkway (Refer to Fig.1). Land Use Type: Nursery (Wholesale) ITE Code 4: Land Use Code (LUC) 818 Description: The nroicct proposes a 31 acre wholesale nunerv. 'llre site is currently vacant. The property will allow for cultivation of landscaping vegetation as well as provide storage for landscaping materials, trucks and cuuipment. Page 1 of'6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g ^ 1 18 Packet Pg. 1192 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 g.1— Project Location Map PROJECT LOCATION � r ilk Project will need a PUD Zoning amendment to allow for any Existing Grey Oaks DRI-MPUD — Collier County Ordinance 07-40 access points off of Comprehensive plan recommendation: N/A Livingston. Not any accesses Requested: SIP approval for new development shown on the Master Site Plan. Findings of the Preliminary Study: Studv type: The proposed proiect traffic is less than 50 trips —this studv qualifies for a Small Scale TIS — no significant operational or roadwav impacts. The TIS will include AM and PM peak hour trip generation, PM Pk Hr traffic distribution and assignments, significance test, roadway link analysis. Operational Site Access Tum Lane Analysis — based on build -out External AM -PM Pk Hr trio Lyeneration. Traffic exiting the proiect for northbound destinations will divert to I- 75, Airport -Pulling Road or US -41 as applicable Studv Type: (if not net increase, operational study) Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Maior TIS ❑ Study Area: Boundaries: East —Livingston Rd. Page 2 of 6 9.C.7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 19 Packet Pg. 1193 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Additional intersections to be analyzed: NIA Build Out Year: 2018 Planning Horizon Year: 2018 Analysis Time Period(s): AM/PM Future Off -Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE 9t�' Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: NIA Pass -by trips: N/A Internal trips (PUD): N/A Transit use: NIA Other: NIA Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2018 Methodoloey & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: Collier County traffic counts and/or 2015 AUIR Site -trip generation: LUC 818 — rTE 9"' Edition Trip distribution method: engineer's estimate — refer to Fig. 2, below Traffic assignment method: project trip generation with background growth Traffic growth rate: historical growth rate or 2% minimum Project Accesses: Livingston Rd — northbound left in. Livingston Rd — southbound right in -right out. — see Fig. 3 — Proiect Turning Movements by Percentage on next page. Fig. 2 — Project Trip Distribution by Percentage PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION' PROJECT LOCATION MAP BY PERCENTAGE �+ t nry ; �iF1PR�PAWf W 100W _�...0 I i• 30 LA ..G�o^9�e Page 3 of 6 9.C.7 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 20 Packet Pg. 1194 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Fig. 3 — ProJecl 'Turning Movements by Percentage PROJECT TURNING MOVEMENTS BY PERCENTAGE N � . \" 9.C.7 **TIS will need to discuss right turn lanes at both entrances at this Arterial was to be has a raised considered as an median. there r will also be I► O some 0 ', distribution to L the southerly I 0 driveway. M T) 2 Per Pre -App, this r - was to be N considered as an r exit. If project I► o 0 a turn lane is 0 needed here. a There is also no Per Pre -App, this r - Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA ° ^ ^ 1 21 Packet Pg. 1195 was to be G considered as an env exit. If project 2 improved, a right a turn lane is Q needed here. u_ There is also no c turning E r movements here. Applicant wanted to see if this could Q be right out only. This may be an FPL access road E in which as show — would need a righ 0 turn lane. Q 4 o Page Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA ° ^ ^ 1 21 Packet Pg. 1195 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Special Features: from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: NIA Sight distance: NIA Queuing: NIA Access location & configuration: NIA Traffic control: MUTL D Signal system location & progression needs: NIA On-site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: CC 2015 AUIR: CC Traffic Counts Base maps: NIA Prior study reports: NIA Access policy and jurisdiction: NIA Review process: NIA Requirements: NIA Miscellaneous: N/A Small Scale Study – No Fee 7: Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 Methodology Fee $500 x Includes 0 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each Ali fees bili he agreed to during the 3ferhodologp meeting and iruesi he paid to Trampartation prier to our sign -off m the appheutirn:. SIGNAT URES NormIiyt- TYebUoock Study Preparer—Norinan'Frebilcock Reviower(s) Applicant Collier County Page 5 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g ^ 1 22 Packet Pg. 1196 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule 9.C.7 Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodolop-v Review - $500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approvallcomments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a rc-submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County, if needed. "Small Scale Study" Review - No Additional Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation, distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Study Review" - $750 Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collcetcd/asscmbled, review of off-site improvements within the right-of-way, review of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/qucstions. "Nfalor Stuck Reyie-,r," - $1,500 Fee (includes two intersection analysis and two sufticieney reviews Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of traffic growth analysis, review of off-site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation, neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of "sufficiency" commcnts/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review" - $500 Fee '17mc review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the "Major Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews" - $500 Fee Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 6 of'6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g ^ 1 23 Packet Pg. 1197 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.C.7 Appendix C: Collier County Ordinance 2007-40 - Excerpt (1 Sheet) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 24 Packet Pg. 1198 9.C.7 O'Donnell Nursery - PUDA TIS - March 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g ^ 1 25 Packet Pg. 1199 THE GREY OAKS PUD TABLE LAND USE SUMMARY Northeast and Southeast Quadrants Collier County) AMOUNT ACREAGE Residential units 1,371 D_U. ,6 Ac. 55.34 +1- Ac. Conservation Commercial {Total} 9,2x3,091 S.F. H70.4 1- Ac. 353.89 Ac. Office {gross floor area} 583,453 S.F. Retail {gross leasable area} 609,638 S.F. Hotel Q Rooms 0 Ac. Golf CourselRecreationl Park/Right ht of Way 54 Hales 614.31 Ac. Lake/ Water Management 225.41 Ac. Conservation 5.32 Ac. Sub -Total 7,47.45 Ac. Note: Native Vegetation Preserve in Northeast and Southeast Quadrants totals 79.3,6 acres. (flee attached drawings E-1 through E-4 for locations)_ Northwest Quadrant C of Naples) AMOUNT � ACREAGE Residential units � 464 d.0 100.71 +1- Ac. Commercial {Total) 100,000 S.F. 14,4 +l- Ac. Office {gross floor area} 60,1700 S.F. Retail {grass leasable area} 4p,U0p S.F. Golf CourselRecreation! Park/Right-of- Way 1 g voles 147.4 +l_ Ac. Lake/ -f Water Management 7,6.04 +1- Ac. Note: Native Vegetation Preserve in Northwest Quadrant totals 58.63 acres. (See attached Drawings E-1 through E-4 for locations). Note: All acreages are digitized approximate acreages and are subject to change and variation. Note: The Northeast Quadrant shall have a total commerciailoffice square footage of 1,203,091 S.F. (Revised 4111107) 15 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g ^ 1 25 Packet Pg. 1199 55.34 +1- Ac. Conservation - - Sub -Total 353.89 Ac. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g ^ 1 25 Packet Pg. 1199 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.C.7 Appendix D: Collier County PUD Monitoring Report - Excerpt (1 Sheet) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 26 Packet Pg. 1200 UIN Iloll] 11IIMffe:9:.IIIF AAA STATUS 0,14 R -L4 DkAwd AX (IM LOWN STAR ... AMS MA TOTAL ACRES TOOTAL SOM DE V. COOK TOTAL W. TOTAL OZ. INUMV. RES.SF RESAF ACRES BEW.SOFT ACRES SOFT ACRES $QfT TOTAL 9 V OTHER OTHFR QuPr(WA[ W If KMPW HKRW HOSP HOSP RM DENS] ( MRSE CMLKAM TOTAL DEW. TOTAL DIW� TOTAL UIWL UNTS r AMS Notts AMWil 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1201 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.C.7 Appendix E: Grey Oaks DRI - Conceptual Roadway Master Plan (1 Sheet) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 28 Packet Pg. 1202 REVISED EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT ACCESS LOCATIONS ACCESSES TO BE ELIMINATED DRNEWAY #1 RESIDENnAL ROADWAY EXLSTING BEAR'S PAW ENTRANCE 9.C.7 EXISTING POINCIANA DINEWAY /7 VILLAGE ENTRANCE 4—R ESIOENTIAL ROADWAY FXEnNc POINCIANA VILLAGE ENTRANCE E]OSTING --)° COACH HOUSE LANE �� p Q O �� ESISTING ELEMENTARY D Q SQIOOL ENTRANCE 70 a DRNEWAY 0•B8 OFFICE/COMMERCIAL ORWEWAY /2 OFFICE/COMMERCP.L METING POINCNNA OFFICE ENTRANCE B GREY OAKS DR DRIVEWAY OBA COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE VCIRANCES pRIVEwAY EIiMiRAiEO Y /3A DRNEWAY +4 DRIVEWAY 038 DRNEWAY #D RESE)WLAL ROADWAY N o shoo' 10 00' PROJECT DRI4EWAYM9 ACCESS NORTH 4 Q Z P z J JPROJECT DRNL:IA'AY IBA ACCESS SOUTH GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY DRNEWAY �$ LEG END �Q► SiCNAL DRIVEWAY0'72 • RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY LANE ARRANGEMENTS 99587/098/0500 CONCEPTUAL ROADWAY FOR SITE ACCESS Reviwd 07�24MV MASTER PLAN WITH INTERCHANGE 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 1203 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.C.7 Appendix F: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition (6 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 30 Packet Pg. 1204 a' FT 0 0 0 c op 0 0 c r, O D Project Name: O Donnell Nursery- Proposed No: Date: 2122/2018 City: StatefProvince: ZipfPostal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: ITE-TGM 10th Edition WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE SIZE Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 818 - Nursery (Wholesale) (General Urban/Suburban) 27 264 263 ❑� 2❑ E2 10 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 264 263 5 2 N13 10 817 - Nursery (Garden Center) (General UrbanfSuburban) 7.5 «' 256 255 9 9 26 Reduction 128 127 5 4 13 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 128 128® El 13 13 858 - Farmers NFarket (General UrbanfSuburban) 1.25 ' 110 109 110 109 108 117 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 110 109 110 109 108 117 Total 5 3D Total Reduction 638 i 627 124 1240 113 113 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Non -pass -by 502 500 119 116 123 140 (1) Acres (2) 1000 Sq_ R GFA 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1205 0 0 0 c 0 0 c 0 D CU as m W N PERIOD SETTING DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click - Add Notes above. EXIT REDUCTION ADJUSTED EXIT 818 - Nursery (Wholesale) PROJECT NAME. 0 DONIVELL NURSERY -PROPOSED 0 263 817 - Nursery (Garden Center) ANALYSIS NAME. Weekday 128 50 % 128 858 - Farmers Market LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE VARIABLE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL 818- Nursery "olesale) Acres ❑U 21(01 General Urban/Suburban Weekday Average ❑/ d 26401 263(( 527(') 19.5 817- Nursery (Garden Center) 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 7.5 Urb Weekday Average 256 255 511 n/Subulrban 68.1 858- Farmers Market 0 Acres ❑v 1.25(' Generalak Weekday, AM Pev Average Q 11001 1090( 2190( Urban/Suburban 1749 (0) indicates size out of range. Q The time periods do not match. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Specify a percentage by which the Entry Trip and Exit Trip will be reduced for each Land Use. This reduction is applied to the Entry Trip and Exit Trip from the previous section. To record any notes, click • Add Notes above. LAND USE ENTRY REDUCTION ADJUSTED ENTRY EXIT REDUCTION ADJUSTED EXIT 818 - Nursery (Wholesale) 0�% 264 0 263 817 - Nursery (Garden Center) 50 % 128 50 % 128 858 - Farmers Market 0=% 110 4 "% 109 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1206 -E PERIOD SETTING DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click Add Notes above. PROJECTNAME'. 0- DONN ELL NURSERY -PROPOSED ANALYSIS NAME' qM Peak Hour INDEPENDENT LAND USE SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE 818 -Nursery (Wholesale) Acres l 27 General Urban/Suburban Weekday, Peak Hoi� Average 5 ❑ * �} 2 7 ❑ 0 817 - Nursery (Garden Center) 50 A *** ® 0.26 El 858 - Farmers Market C�/- 110 817 -Nursery (Garden Center) 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Ej ] 7.5 General Weekday, Peak Hotw Urban/Suburban Average 2.43 858 -Farmers Market Acres Ell 1.250) General Weekday, AM Peak Lerage V❑ 110(1) 109R' 219(')Urban/Suburban 174 9 (0) indicates directional distribution was not provided in the source document. Q The time periods do not match. This study cannot be used for trip distribution. (1) indicates size out or range. "Directional distribution was not available for this land use. A 75%/25% directional distribution was assumed for the AM Peak Hour. (2) indicates small sample size, use carefully. "Directional distribution was not available for this land use. A 50%/50% directional distribution was assumed for the AM Peak Hour. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Specify a percentage by which the Entry Trip and Exit Trip will be reduced for each Land Use. This reduction is applied to the Entry Trip and Exit Trip from the previous section. To record any notes, click - Add Notes above. LAND USE ENTRY REDUCTION ADJUSTED ENTRY EXIT REDUCTION ADJUSTED EXIT 818 - Nursery (Wholesale) D/ 5 E'% 0 817 - Nursery (Garden Center) 50 A *** ® 50 % *** El 858 - Farmers Market C�/- 110 (7771% 109 ***A 50% reduction is assumed for the Nursery (Garden Center) when the Farmers Market is operational. W W 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1207 9.C.7 PERIOD SETTING ., DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click • Add Notes above. PROJECTNAME. O DONNELL NURSERY - PROPOSED ANALYSIS NAME. PM Peak Hour LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE VARIABLE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL 818 -Nursery (Wholesaler) y❑ 27 e) A General Weekday, Peak Hor� Average 010 858 - Farmers Market 0 108 E * 12(0( ***A 50% reduction is assumed for the Nursery (Garden Center) when the Farmers Market is operational. Urban/Suburban 0.45 817 -Nursery (Garden Center) 1000 Sq. Ft. G.FA 0 7.5 General Weekday, Peak HoiE Average ❑v 26 26 ** 52(o( Urban/Suburban 694 858 - Farmers Market Acres 0 1 25O General IWeekday, PM Peak Average ❑Y 1482) 117( 225(2} Urban/Suburban 179.84 (0) indicates directional distribution was not provided in the source document. Q The time periods do not match. This study cannot be used for trip distribution. (1) indicates size out of range. Directional distribution was not available for this land use. A 250/ol75% directional distribution was assumed for the PM Peak Hour. (2) indicates small sample size, use carefully —Directional distribution was not available for this land use. A 50%/50% directional distribution was assumed for the PM Peak Hour. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Specify a percentage by which the Entry Trip and Exit Trip will be reduced for each Land Use. This reduction is applied to the Entry Trip and Exit Trip from the previous section. To record any notes, click Add Notes above. LAND USE ENTRY REDUCTION ADJUSTED ENTRY EXIT REDUCTION ADJUSTED EXIT 818 - Nursery (Wholesale) % El CO `% ED 817 - Nursery (Garden Center) 50 %*** 13 . (:51D7'% *** "13 858 - Farmers Market 0 108 C % 117 ***A 50% reduction is assumed for the Nursery (Garden Center) when the Farmers Market is operational. UP) R O C7 a+ y.+ R .N R 2 C> N I- CD O N J a O M CD r- 0 O r to U .Q sZ a LL c d E t V a r c m E t R Q Packet Pg. 1208 Project Name: Grey Oaks- Retail Conversion No: ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click • Date: 2122/2018 City: PROJECT NAME: GREY OAKS- RETAIL CONVERSION State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD Country: Client Name: 824- Shopping Center 1040 Sq. Ft. GLA ❑� 84.5 Analyst's Name: v Best Fit (LOG) ❑ 2594 2594 5188 Edition: ITE-TGM 10th Edition Ln(T) = 0.68Ln(X) + 5.57 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE SIZE Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 820 -Shopping Center (General Urban/Suburban) 80.5 ' 2594 2594 119 73 222 241 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 2594 2594 119 73 222 241 Total 2594 2594 119 73 222 241 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Nan -pass -by 2594 2594 119 73 222 241 (1) 100051q P GLA 9.C.7 Ta _ s � ti =, 0 6'1 00 N r O O O r O N J a O M CD C 0 �r U .Q Q a LL c a� E t V R a+ a r C d t V R r al Packet Pg. 1209 PERIOD SETTING ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click • Add Notes above. PROJECT NAME: GREY OAKS- RETAIL CONVERSION ANALYSIS NAME: Weekday LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE 824- Shopping Center 1040 Sq. Ft. GLA ❑� 84.5 General Weekday v Best Fit (LOG) ❑ 2594 2594 5188 Urban/Suburban Ln(T) = 0.68Ln(X) + 5.57 9.C.7 Ta _ s � ti =, 0 6'1 00 N r O O O r O N J a O M CD C 0 �r U .Q Q a LL c a� E t V R a+ a r C d t V R r al Packet Pg. 1209 CU aq rD W 9.C.7 PERIOD SETTING ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click - Add Notes above. PROJECT NAME_ GREY OAKS- RETAIL CONVERSION ANALYSIS NAME. AM Peak Hour I LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE General Best 2Fit (LIN) J 820- Shopping Center 100.0 Sq. Ft. GLA 80.5 Urban/Suburban Weekday, Peak HorO 119 73 192 T=0.5(X)+151.78 PERIOD SETTING v DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click • Add Notes above. PROJECT NAME GREY OAKS- RETAIL CONVERSION ANALYSIS NAME: PM Peak Hour LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE 820 - Shopping Center1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 80.5 General 11Veekday, Peak Hor� Best Fit (LOG)EU 222 241 463 Urban/Suburban Ln(T) = 0.74Ln(X) + 2.89 i i Packet Pg. 1210 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.C.7 Appendix G: Turning Movements Exhibit (2 Sheets) EWA ^. N R O a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 37 Packet Pg. 1211 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.C.7 PROJECT TURNING MOVEMENTS BY PERCENTAGE 50% 3 `3 � �� 1 �• 3e '8 @� i;s c PROJECT I I I � � � I SOUTH ACCESS IS RIGHT -OUT ONLY 0 ,L^ V T) C6 N I- Q O O ti O N J d CD Cl) t0 0 V Q Q U_ C a� E a a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 38 Packet Pg. 1212 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.C.7 PROJECT TURNING MOVEMENTS BY AM/PM PEAK HOUR Arm 1 AM -1 35, PM -87 \ \ i li 'AM -1-3,47 PM -86 Y' `.1 � I PROJECT 'r r 0 ,L^ V lC T) 2 C6 N ti O O O 0 N J d C) M t0 C 0 .Q a LL E a c m E a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 39 Packet Pg. 1213 9.C.7 rn M CD C O r O U .Q Q a LL E a r E cc a Packet Pg. 1215 9.C.7 Rick Scott DEC Cissy Proctor GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT-' ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY October 4, 2017 Mr. D. Wayne Arnold Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 RE: Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact; File No. ADA -09-1989-045 Dear Mr. Arnold: The Department has evaluated your request, dated July 18, 2017, for confirmation that the shifting of two previously approved project access points from Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, to Livingston Road, for the Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact Development Order meets the requirements of Section 380.06(19)(e)2., Florida Statutes (F.S.). Your letter indicates that the two project access points shown on Map H have not been installed, but, were intended to serve as access points to the Grey Oaks community. Further, the two access points proposed to be shifted to Livingston Road are not intended for general access to the Grey Oaks community, but rather are intended for the sole use by the owner of approximately 32 acres adjacent to Livingston Road, and that this portion of the site is encumbered by a Florida Power & Light (FPL) easement. Your letter states that the PUD previously approved by Collier County, permits the FPL easement to be used as a landscape nursery; the owner of the fee simple lands within the FPL easement currently has a temporary agreement with the Grey Oaks homeowner association regarding the gated entrance on Livingston Road for use of the landscape nursery vehicles; and the two access points onto the lands encumbered by the FPL easement will be utilized for the landscape nursery operations. Lastly, the two access points on Livingston Road will not provide general access to the Grey Oaks community, and will be restricted to use by only the property owner of the fee simple lands encumbered by the FPL easement. The Department finds, in consultation with the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council and Florida Department of Transportation, that the proposed amendment is similar in nature, impact, or character to the changes enumerated in Section 380.06(19)(e)2.a-I., F.S., the proposed amendment does not create the likelihood of any additional regional impact, the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity I Caldwell Building 1107 E. Madison Street I Tallahassee, FL 32399 850.245.7105 1 www.floridajobs.org www.twitter.com/FLDEO lwww.facebook.com/FLDEO An equal opportunity employer/program. Auxiliary aids and service are available upon request to individuals with disabilities. All voice telephone numbers on this document may be reached by persons using TTY/TTD equipment via the Florida Relay Service at 711. Packet Pg. 1216 Mr. D. Wayne Arnold October 4, 2017 Page 2 of 2 proposed amendment does not require the filing of a notice of proposed change, and that the proposed amendment will only require an application to Collier County to amend the development order in accordance with the County's procedures for amendment of a development order. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact Brenda Winningham, Regional Planning Administrator, at (850) 717-8516, or by email at brenda.winningham@deo.mvflorida.com. Sincerely, Ja es D. Stansbury, Chief reau of Community Planning and Growth 1DS/bw 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1217 �ay�7 S 9107j77 ORDINANCE NO. 07_ 40 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM PUD TO MPUD FOR THE GREY OAKS MPUD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST, NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST QUADRANTS OF THE INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT ROAD (STATE ROAD 31) AND GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (COUNTY ROAD 886), IN SECTIONS 24, 25, AND 26 TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 1,601± ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 00-46, THE FORMER GREY OAKS PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Bruce Tyson, AICP, RLA, of WilsonMiller, Inc., representing Naples Grande Holdings LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the real property described in the MPUD Document located in Sections, 24, 25 and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) in accordance with the MPUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A," which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. Grey Oaks, PUDA-2006-AR-10157 Page 1 of 2 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1218 SECTION TWO: Ordinance Number 00-46, known as the Grey Oaks PUD, adopted on June 27, 2000, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by supermajority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ,a day of r 1 , 2007. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK nr �1Deputy Clerk J test es ta:ihaIroan • sigaatur4.n�1- Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:' Marjori M. Student- tirling Assistant County Attorney P U DA-2006-AR-10157/KD/sp Grey Oaks, PUDA-2006-AR-10157 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This ordinance filed with +8 of Stuft's Office thl and alupwledgerf+9 thof of i D _ 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1219 9.C.7 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT FOR GREY OAKS PREPARED BY: WILSONMILLER, INC. 3200 BAILEY LANE, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105 " Exhibit A" (Revised 4/99/07) DATE FILED DATE APPROVED BY BCC - -2007 ORDINANCE NUMBER 90-48 AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 97-45 AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 98-94 AMENDED BY ORDINANCE AMENDED BY ORDINANCE Packet Pg. 1220 INDEX PAGE List of Maps, Exhibits, and Tables iii Statement of Compliance and Short Title iv SECTION I Property Ownership and Legal Description 6 SECTION II Project Development 8 SECTION III Residential 18 SECTION IV Golf Course/Recreation/Park/Right-of-Way 23 SECTION V Conservation/Open Space 26 SECTION VI Commercial 28 SECTION VII General Development Commitments 33 (Revised 4/11/07) 2 9.C.7 w a Packet Pg. 1221 LIST OF MAPS AND TABLES ITATTVI , H - 1 PUD Master Plan E — 1 Native Vegetation within Grey Oaks E — 2 Native Vegetation — North Area of Northeast Quadrant E — 3 Native Vegetation — Northwest Quadrant E-4 Native Vegetation — Southeast Quadrant and Southern Area of Northeast Quadrant TABLES TABLE I Land Use Summary TABLE it Project Absorption Schedule Estimate TABLE III Development Standards (Revised 4/11/07) 3 9.C.7 n O m C� r T) x C6 N ti 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a M v m c 0 r Q a Q LL C 0 E Q r C m E ca r w a Packet Pg. 1222 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE It is the intent of the Halstatt Partnership, A Florida General Partnership to create a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to be known as Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development, on 1,601.39 acres of land located in Section 24, and 25, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, and Section 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, City of Naples, Florida. The residential, recreational and commercial facilities of THE GREY OAKS DRI/PUD are consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives of the City of Naples and Collier County for the following reasons: 1) The subject property is located within the City and County Urban service areas and there are adequate available community facilities and services to support the proposed residential density and commercial intensity. 2) The City of Naples made a determination that the part of Grey Oaks in the City is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and land development regulations adopted by the City. 3) With regard to that part of Grey Oaks within the County: a) The project development is compatible and complementary to the surrounding land uses and future uses allowed by the Future Land Use Element. b) Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. c) The project development will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required by Policies 3.1.H and 3.1.J. of the Future Land Use Element. d) The project development is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities as required by Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element. e) The projected density of less than two (2) dwelling units per acre is less than that allowed under the Future Land Use Element since the project includes three (3) quadrants of an Activity Center and a density band. This project (Revised 4/11/07) 4 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1223 consists of 1,601.39 acres of land, with 1,775 dwelling units, which equals a density of 1.11 dwelling units per acre. f) The subject project occupies the northwest, southeast and northeast quadrants of the Activity Center located at the intersection of Airport and Golden Gate Parkway. This strategic location allows the site superior access for the placement of commercial activities. g) The project includes extensive open spaces in the form of golf courses and incorporates natural features to provide a high quality of life for its residents. SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "GREY OAKS Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Ordinance". (Revised 4/11/07) 5 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1224 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP & LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1.01 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The Northeast quadrant is currently owned by: a) Grey Oaks Country Club, Inc. 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL , 34105. b) LDG South LLC, 5692 Strand Court, Naples, FL, 34110. C) Individual Landowners. The Southeast quadrant is currently owned by: a) Panthers Grey Oaks, Inc., c/o Naples Grande Golf Club, 475 Seagate Drive, Naples, FL, 34103. b) Naples Grande Holdings LLC, 404 Citation Pt., Naples, FL, 34104. C) Sea Investments LLC, 10350 Bren Road W., Minnetonka, MN, 55343. The Northwest quadrant is currently owned by: a) Halstatt Partnership, 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL, 34105. b) Estuary at Grey Oaks LTD, 4200 Gulf Shore Blvd. N., Naples, FL, 34103. C) Grey Oaks County Club, Inc., 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL, 34105. d) Individual Landowners. 1.02 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of Section 24, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, lying easterly of that 100 foot canal right-of-way as described in O.R. Book 154, page 6, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; ALSO All that part of Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, lying easterly of that 100 foot canal right-of-way as described in O.R. Book 154, page 6, O.R. Book 873, page 1879 and O.R. Book 873, page 1882, all of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; LESS Golden Gate Parkway (C-886) as described in O.R. Book 465, page 275, and O. R. Book 465, page 278, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; ALSO LESS those lands described in O.R. Book 194, page 603 and O.R. Book 640, page 229, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, (Revised 4/11/07) 6 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1225 ALSO All that part of Section 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, lying westerly of Airport -Pulling Road (C-31) and northerly of Golden Gate Parkway (C- 886) located within the City of Naples; LESS that portion thereof as described in O.R. Book 539, page 370, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; above property subject to easements and restrictions of record; containing 1,601.39 net acres more or less. (Revised 4/11/07) 7 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1226 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the plan of the development and delineate the general conditions that will apply to the project. 2.02 INTRODUCTION Grey Oaks is a 1,601.39 acre mixed use residential development and golf course community with a "town center", and other retail and office development located in Collier County. The property is generally located in the northwest, northeast, and southeast quadrants of the intersection of Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway. The property is bounded on the east by Livingston Road; on the south by the Golden Gate Canal; on the west by the Gordon River Watershed; and on the north by the Coach House Land Residential Properties in the west quadrant, and the World Tennis Center in the northeast quadrant. The northwest quadrant of the property is in the incorporated City of Naples and constitutes approximately 354 of the 1,601.39 acres. The remainder of the property is located in the unincorporated area of Collier County. The project is of a size to be a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and an Application for Development Approval (ADA) has been filed pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes (1988). Because the City and County recognize that the project has been planned and will be developed as a unified integrated community, the City and County have agreed that a single local government (Collier County) should have the responsibility for reviewing the planned development and issuing a Development Order pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes and for adopting the zoning (MPUD Ordinance) for the entire project, including that portion that lies with the City of Naples. In furtherance of the goal of having one entity review the proposed project and adopt a zoning ordinance (MPUD) and Development Order for the project, the developer and the City of Naples have entered into a DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT and the City of Naples and Collier County have entered into an "INTERLOCAL GOVERNMENT AGREEMENT" with regard to the project. The DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT sets forth the maximum intensities of land uses for the property within the City and provides that the City agrees to accept and adopt (if appropriate) any Development Order and MPUD zoning issued by the County that does not exceed the intensities of land uses set forth in said DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT allows the County to review the proposed project as a single integrated planned community and approve a single set of development standards for the entire project by adopting a single PUD Ordinance and Development Order for the project. (Revised 4/11107) 8 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1227 The INTERLOCAL GOVERNMENT AGREEMENT between the City of Naples and the County of Collier incorporates said DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT and further provides that the City and County agree that the County shall conduct the rezoning and DRI review for the entire 1,601.39 acre project, including that portion of the project within the jurisdiction of the City of Naples. A copy of the INTERLOCAL GOVERNMENT AGREEMENT and the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT are made a part of this MPUD by reference thereto. The County, City and the Developer have all agreed that the 354 acres within the jurisdiction of the City is an integral part of the overall Grey Oaks DRI Community and it is therefore, essential to the viability of the planned community that the MPUD and DRI plan approved by Collier County be in effect and remain in effect for the entirety of the project and not just the portion of the project lying within the jurisdiction of the County of Collier. 2.03 LAND USES Table I is a schedule of the intended land uses types, with total dwelling units, acreage, and total square feet commercial indicated. The arrangement of these land use types is shown on Map H-1, Planned Unit Development Master Plan. Changes and variations in design and acreages shall be permitted during each subdivision phase at final design to accommodate topography, vegetation, and other site conditions. The final size of the recreation and open space lands will depend on the actual requirements for conservation areas, water management, golf course layout, roadway pattern, and dwelling unit size and configuration. At the time of Subdivision review and approval for each subdivision phase, the location, size and configuration of land use tracts shall be identified, along with the assignment of permitted residential or commercial land use types. The assignment of maximum allowed residential density and/or commercial gross leasable floor area shall also occur at the time of subdivision review and approval. If the maximum allowed residential density or commercial gross leasable area is not fully used within that subdivision phase of the project the unused remainder may be assigned to another phase(s) of the project. Final determination of the total multi -family residential or commercial use shall be determined at time of site development plan approval. For each succeeding subdivision and/or site development plan, a table shall be included which summarizes the total dwelling units and commercial floor area that has been previously assigned and total assigned for the pending approval, in order to facilitate the County's monitoring of the project. (Revised 4/11/07) 9 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1228 2.04 PROJECT DENSITY The total acreage of Grey Oaks Mixed Use Planned Unit Development is approximately 1,601.39 acres. The maximum number of dwelling units to be built on the total acreage is 1,775. The number of dwelling units per gross acre is approximately 1.11. The density on individual parcels of land throughout the project will vary according to the type of housing placed on each parcel of land but shall comply with guidelines established in this document. 2.05 PERMITTED VARIATIONS OF DWELLING UNITS All properties designated for residential uses may be developed at the maximum number of dwelling units allocated, provided that the total number of dwelling units shall not exceed 1,775. Table I identifies the maximum units by project quadrant. 2.06 DEVELOPMENT SEQUENCE AND SCHEDULE The developer will commence the project within the northeast quadrant. Within each quadrant, the amount and location of each subsequent development area will be dictated by logical and economical development constraints and by market demand. Table 11 indicates, by project year, the estimated absorption of units, and commercial square footage. The absorption schedule is an estimate and not guaranteed. Actual absorption rates are governed by market demand. 2.07 EASEMENTS FOR UTILITIES All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time of development. 2.08 COLLIER COUNTY AND CITY OF NAPLES SUBDIVISION APPROVAL The review and approval of subdivision master plans and construction plans shall follow the design and development standards of the Collier County Ordinances regulating subdivisions in effect at the time of development; and shall be reviewed and approved in accordance with the procedures set forth by Collier County for that portion of the project under County jurisdiction. The intent and effect of this Section is to have a single set of substantive standards apply to subdivision master plans to the location of the particular property in question, but to allow each local government to apply its procedural process for approval of said plans. The developer reserves the right to request exceptions and modifications to the standards set forth in applicable regulations. Where this document makes reference to a specific type of subdivision approval (e.g. Subdivision Master Plan Approval or platting) this reference shall be construed to mean the applicable Collier County procedure or approval in effect at the time of development. (Revised 4/11/07) 10 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1229 2.09 LAKE SITING As depicted on the MPUD Master Plan, lakes and natural retention areas have been sited adjacent to existing and planned roadways, property lines, and throughout the golf course. The goal is to achieve an overall aesthetic character for the project, to permit optimum use of the land, provide buffering to uses within and surrounding the project, protect native vegetation, and to increase the efficiency of the water management network. Accordingly, the requirements described in applicable County ordinances, may be reduced subject to the approval of the County Engineer at the time of Subdivision and/or excavation permit approval. Fill material from lakes is planned to be utilized within the project, however excess fill material, not to exceed 10% or maximum 20,000 cubic yards may be utilized off-site, subject to the provisions of the Collier County excavation ordinance in effect at the time of development. Removal of fill material in excess of 10% of total or 20,000 cubic yards shall meet the requirements of a commercial excavation per applicable County ordinances. Final lake area determination shall be in accordance with the South Florida Water Management District stormwater criteria and applicable County ordinances. 2.10 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES Roads and other infrastructure may be either public or private, depending on location, capacity, and design. The developer shall create appropriate homeowner and/or condominium associations or identify other entities which will be responsible for maintaining the roads, streets, drainage, water and sewer improvements where such systems are not dedicated to the County or City. Standards for roads shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of Collier County ordinances regulating subdivisions, unless otherwise approved as an exception during subdivision approval. 2.11 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL The provisions of the LDC shall apply to the development of platted tracts or parcels of land as provided in the LDC prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. Approval of commercial tracts in the City of Naples jurisdiction shall follow the General Development and Site Plan (GDSP) process. 2.12 MODEL HOMES AND MODEL UNITS Model Homes and units shall be permitted within this project subject to the following provisions: a) Models may be constructed prior to approval of a plat. b) Models may be permitted as "dry models" and shall obtain a conditional certificate of occupancy for model purposes only. Models may not be permanently occupied until a permanent certificate of occupancy is issued. (Revised 4/11/07) 11 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1230 c) Models may not be utilized as "sales offices" without approval by and through the site development plan process. The site development plan process shall not be required for dry models pursuant to this Section. d) Prior to recording of any plat, metes and bounds legal descriptions shall be provided to and accepted by Collier County as sufficient for building permit issuance. Said metes and bounds legal descriptions shall meet proposed plat configurations and all models constructed pursuant hereto shall conform to applicable minimum square footages, setbacks, and the like as set forth herein. e) Temporary access and utility easements may be provided in lieu of dedicated rights- of-way for temporary service to model homes or units. f) Sales, marketing, and administrative functions shall be permitted to occur in designated model homes or units within the project only as provided herein. 2.13 CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The standards for the construction of all project infrastructure, such as, but not limited to roads, utilities, wastewater treatment, water management facilities, and other site improvements such as but not limited to clearing, grading, excavation, landscaping and all similar types of site improvements, except for habitable buildings and structures, shall meet the minimum standards set forth by Collier County in the applicable ordinance or regulation in effect at time of development. City of Naples construction standards shall be used for water and sewer systems under City jurisdiction. The procedures for the review and approval of project infrastructure and site improvements shall be that process in effect at the time of review and approval in accordance with the City of Naples regulations for that part of the project within City jurisdiction, and Collier County regulations for that part of the project within County jurisdiction. The standards and development permit procedures for all habitable structures shall be in accordance with the appropriate City or County jurisdiction's requirements in effect at the time of building permit application. 2.14 SALES CENTERS a) "Sales Centers" may be constructed prior to recording of a plat. "Sales Centers" may be serviced by a temporary utility system (i.e. dry well and septic tank/drainfield) prior to availability of central utility systems at which time connection to the central system will be made. Interim fire protection facilities, in accordance with NFPA requirements or as approved by the appropriate fire district shall be required unless a permanent water system is available to serve the Center. (Revised 4/9 9/07) 12 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1231 b) Review and approval of "Sales Centers" shall follow the requirements of the site development plan process of the LDC or whatever approval procedure is in effect at that time. A metes and bounds legal description shall be provided as part of the application. Access to the "Sales Center' shall be provided by a paved road or temporary driveway which meets applicable County standards as determined by the County Engineer. A water management plan shall be provided which accommodates the runoff from the "Sales Center', the required parking and access road/driveway and any other impervious surfaces. The system shall be designed to fit in with the master water management system for the entire development. c) At the time of building permit application for a "Sales Center" a temporary use permit shall be obtained. "Sales Centers" may not be occupied until a certificate of occupancy is issued. Models shall obtain a conditional certificate of occupancy for model purposes only. Models may not be occupied until a permanent certificate of occupancy is issued. 2.15 IMPACT FEES Development within the project shall be subject to all lawfully adopted impact fees in effect at the time of development. 2.16 DEVIATIONS" A. Deviation from LDC Section 4.02.24 A.2. and 3. — Corridor Management Overlay District which requires a front yard setback of 100 feet for the first floor of residential dwelling units and a 25 -foot setback for each additional floor. Deviation: Residential structures within the Grey Oaks MPUD shall comply with Section 4.02.24, Corridor Management Overlay District unless an enhanced Type D Buffer, 20 feet in width, containing a wall and landscaping is placed along Golden Gate Parkway between residential development and the Parkway. Residential structures shall be set back a minimum of 2 feet horizontally for every 1 -foot of building height measured from the property line to any point on the building, but in no case shall any residential structure be closer than 100 feet to Golden Gate Parkway. Sections, drawn to scale, shall demonstrate that sight lines from passing passenger cars (4 feet in height) in the center lane of the eastbound lanes of Golden Gate Parkway will break the views to the top of residential buildings within the southeast quadrant of the Grey Oaks MPUD. These tree heights shall be shown on the perimeter buffer landscape site development plan drawings. Trees and shrubs may be planted and maintained by the developer within the Golden Gate Parkway right-of- way provided that a landscape maintenance agreement is executed between the County and developer. B. Deviation to 5.03.02.C.1 of the LDC, Wall Height, which states that fences or walls in residential districts shall be maximum of six (6) feet tall. (Revised 4/11/07) 13 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1232 Within the Grey Oaks MPUD, walls, not to exceed ten feet (10') in height, shall be permitted along both sides of Golden Gate Parkway and along Livingston Road in the northeast and southeast quadrants. The walls shall be located to allow a minimum of five feet (5) of landscaping between the property/right-of-way line and the walls. The intent is to provide consistency within the Grey Oaks project so that existing and proposed walls are of similar height. C. Deviation from Section 6.06.01 J. of the LDC, Dead-end Streets, which states that dead-end streets shall be prohibited except when designed as a cul-de-sac. Culs-de- sac in excess of 1,000 feet shall not be permitted unless topographical conditions or other natural features preclude a street layout to avoid longer culs-de-sac. Within the southeast quadrant, a deviation is requested to allow for cul-de-sac streets to be 2,300 feet in length providing that roadway and cul-de-sac lengths do not conflict with the County Fire Protection Ordinance. D. Deviation from Section 6.06.02 A.3 of the LDC, Sidewalks and Bike Lane Requirements, which states that sidewalks five (5) feet in width must be provided on both sides of local streets. In the Grey Oaks MPUD, local streets that only provide access to residential units placed on one side of a cul-de-sac street shall be required to be served by a 6 -foot sidewalk on the side of the street serving the residential units. No sidewalk shall be required on the side of the street without residential units. * Deviations apply to Southeast Quadrant only. 2.17 GENERAL Development of Grey Oaks shall proceed in accordance with the contents of this Document, MPUD-Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District, applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan and the regulations in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of issuance of any development orders to which said regulations relate governing the permitting and construction of improvements, such as but not limited to final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit and preliminary work authorization. Where these regulations fail to provide development standards then the provisions of the most similar district in the County Land Development Code shall apply. (Revised 4/11/07) 14 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1233 THE GREY OAKS PUD TABLE I LAND USE SUMMARY Northeast and Southeast Quadrants (Collier Countv) Note: Native Vegetation Preserve in Northeast and Southeast Quadrants totals 79.36 acres. (See attached Drawings E-1 through E-4 for locations). Northwest Quadrant (City of Naples) AMOUNT ACREAGE Residential units 1,311 D.U. 332.06 Ac. Commercial (Total) 1,203,091 S.F. 70.4 +/- Ac. Office (gross floor area) 593,453 S.F. Retail (gross leasable area) 609,638 S.F. Hotel 0 Rooms 0 Ac. Golf Course/Recreation/ Park/Right of Way 54 Holes 614.31 Ac. Lake/ Water Management 225.41 Ac. Conservation 5.32 Ac. Sub -Total 1,247.45 Ac. Note: Native Vegetation Preserve in Northeast and Southeast Quadrants totals 79.36 acres. (See attached Drawings E-1 through E-4 for locations). Northwest Quadrant (City of Naples) Note: Native Vegetation Preserve in Northwest Quadrant totals 58.63 acres. (See attached Drawings E- 1 through E-4 for locations). Note: All acreages are digitized approximate acreages and are subject to change and variation. Note: The Northeast Quadrant shall have a total commercial/office square footage of 1,203,091 S.F. (Revised 4/11/07) 15 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1234 AMOUNT ACREAGE Residential units 464 d.u. 100.71 +/- Ac. Commercial (Total) 100,000 S.F. 14.4 +/- Ac. Office (gross floor area) 60,000 S.F. Retail (gross leasable area) 40,000 S.F. Golf Course/Recreation/ Park/Right-of- Way 18 Holes 107.4 +/- Ac. Lake/ Water Management 76.04 +/- Ac. Conservation 55.34 +/- Ac. Sub -Total 353.89 Ac. Note: Native Vegetation Preserve in Northwest Quadrant totals 58.63 acres. (See attached Drawings E- 1 through E-4 for locations). Note: All acreages are digitized approximate acreages and are subject to change and variation. Note: The Northeast Quadrant shall have a total commercial/office square footage of 1,203,091 S.F. (Revised 4/11/07) 15 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1234 THE GREY OAKS PUD TABLE II PROJECT ABSORPTION SCHEDULE ESTIMATE PROJECT YEAR 1-6 (1989-1995) Land Use No. Hotel Square Designation Units Rooms Feet Residential 94 Commercial (GLA) and Office (GFA) 0 Hotel 0 Golf Course* 1 * Golf Course = 18 holes with phased club facilities PROJECT YEAR 7-13 (1996-2001) CUMULATIVE Land Use No. Hotel Square Designation Units Rooms Feet Residential 963 Commercial (GLA) and Office (GFA) 500,000 Golf Course* 3 * Gold Course = 54 holes with phased club facilities (Second golf course may be constructed prior to project year 7, and may be built in 9 -hole increments, club facilities may be built in phases to coincide with the golf course construction). (Revised 4/11/07) 16 9.C.7 a Packet Pg. 1235 TABLE ll (Continued) PROJECT ABSORPTION SCHEDULE ESTIMATES PROJECT YEAR 14-20 CUMULATIVE Land Use No. Hotel Square Designation Units Rooms Feet (GLA) Residential 1775 Commercial (GLA) and Office (GFA) 1,303,091 Golf Course` 4 " Golf Course = 72 holes with full club facilities (3`d golf course may be constructed after year 14, and may be built in 9 -hole increments, club facilities may be built in phases to coincide with the golf course construction). Project years shall be adjusted to correspond with the commencement of development. The above development program outlines multi -use categories which will be assigned to the various development pods shown on Map H-1. These land use categories will allow for a true mixed use development to occur and allow the "developer" to respond to an ever changing market over the next 20 years with an anticipated buildout at year 2010. The absorption schedule assumes that build -out of the residential, town center and majority of the office and commercial uses may occur in the first 12 years. (Revised 4/11/07) 17 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1236 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL LAND USE 3.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for the areas designated on Map H-1, Planned Unit Development Master Plan, as "R" or Residential. 3.02 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS A maximum number of 1,775 dwelling units may be constructed on lands designated as "R" or Residential. The 25 +/- acre parcel designated "R" on the MPUD Master Plan located on Livingston Road, south of Golden Gate Parkway may be devoted to Assisted Living Facilities at a floor -to -area ratio not to exceed .45. 3.03 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as "R" or Residential on the Master Land Use Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of residential dwelling unit types. Approximate configurations of land use tracts have been indicated on the MPUD Master Plan, in order to indicate relative size and distribution of the residential uses. These acreages are based on conceptual designs and must be considered to be approximate. Actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of platting. Residential tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways. 3.04 PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES 1) Detached and attached single family homes, cluster homes, zero lot line homes, patio homes, townhomes, multi -family dwellings, neighborhood recreational facilities, churches and other places of worship, and assisted living facilities. 2) Water management facilities; essential services (in accordance with the LDC). Lakes, including lakes with seawall and other types of architectural bank treatment. 3) Open space recreational activities, community parks, and similar uses, including but not limited to shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, swimming pools, boat docks and ramp, canoe launches, fishing piers, boat storage, beach gazebos, concession stands, health trails, bike paths and nature trails, observation platforms, boardwalks, playground, picnic areas and other types of facilities intended for outdoor recreation. 4) Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible in the district. (Revised 4/11/07) 18 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1237 3.05 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES 1) Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with uses permitted in this District. 2) Essential services and facilities, as defined in the LDC. 3) Recreational facilities accessory to a residential structure. 4) Any other accessory uses or structures which are comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible in the district. 3.06 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Table III sets forth the development standards for land uses within the "R" Residential District. Site development standards for categories 1, 2, and 3, uses apply to individual lot boundaries; standards for category 4 uses apply to platted development parcel boundaries. Front yard setbacks shall be measured as follows: 1) If the parcel is served by a City or County dedicated public right-of-way, setback is measured from the existing right-of-way line. 2) If the parcel is served by a private drive, setback is measured from back of curb or edge of pavement, whichever is closer to the structure. 3) Single family detached (Category 1 only) front setbacks shall be measured from the public or private road right-of-way line. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs, guard houses, entrance gates and other land uses not specified herein shall be in accordance with the LDC Code regulations in effect at the time permits are requested unless otherwise specified herein. Unless otherwise indicated, setback, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. Development standards for residential uses not specifically set forth in Table III shall be established during subdivision master plan or site development plan approval as set forth under Sections 2.03 and 2.11 of this Document. Setbacks and other buffer requirements from and along the north property line within the northwest quadrant adjacent to lots on Coach House Lane shall be as follows: a) One story single family structure: (Revised 4/11/07) 19 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1238 Principal — 25' Accessory — 15' b) One story multi -family or two story structure: Principal — 50' Accessory — 50' c) Two story structure greater than 30' in height: Principal — 75' Accessory — 75' d) Three story structure: Principal — 175' Accessory —175' e) Four story structure: Principal — 400' Accessory — 400' f) Vehicular use areas, including garages and carports — 50' (measured to the structure or edge of pavement). g) A 15' wide, as measured perpendicular to said north border, and 25 foot high landscaped buffer shall be provided and maintained which is 80% opaque as measured in every and any 25 by 25 foot section. The buffer shall be installed prior to construction of homes. h) The number of dwelling units per acre shall not exceed 7 units per net acre measured within a band of land 175 feet wide parallel to said north boundary. i) Principal building structures shall not include more than 4 dwelling units within 175 feet of said north boundary. *Two story setback is measured to the second story portion of the structure. One story portion is to be measured as a one story structure, if it is a single family structure. (Revised 4/11/07) 20 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1239 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FLOOR AREA VILLAS 5*4*5 2500 SF/Lot 16' N/A 0' H 10' P 0' GC 10' P 0' GC 2 7' MINIMUM (S.F.) 1200 1000 900 750 900 SITE DEPTH AVERAGE: Determined by dividing the site area by the site width. SITE WIDTH: The average distance between straight lines connecting front and rear parcel lines at each side of the site, measured as straight lines between the foremost points of the side parcel lines in the front (at the point of the intersection with the front parcel line) and the rearmost point of the parcel lines at the rear (point of intersection with the rear parcel line). May be reduced on cul-de-sac lots. (Revised 4/11/07) 21 9.C.7 a Packet Pg. 1240 "R" Residential Areas TABLE III PATIO, ZLL, OR SINGLE SINGLE TWO FAMILY CLUSTER FAMILY FAMILY ATTACHED/ MULTI -FAMILY DETACHED DETACHED OR DUPLEX TOWN HOUSE CATEGORY 1 *4 2 *4 3 *4 4 *4 MINIMUM SITE 9000 5000 35000 1 AC AREA SF/Lot SF/Lot SF/Lot SITE WIDTH 75' 50' 35' 150' MIN.AVG. SITE DEPTH 120' 100' 100' 150' MIN. AVG. FRONT YARD 25' 20' 20'*1 20'P SETBACK SIDE YARD 7.5' 5' 0 or a *6 20' P SETBACK minimum 0' GC of 5' REAR YARD 20' P 15'P 15'P 20' P SETBK PRINCIPAL 10' GC 10' GC 10' GC 0' GC REAR YARD 101P 10' P 10' P 10' P SETBACK ACSRY. 0' GC 0' GC 0' GC 0' GC MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT STORIES ABOVE PARKING 2 2 2 6 *2 DIST.BETWEEN PRINCIPAL STR. 15' 10' 0' or 5' *6 15*3 -1 story 25' *3- 2-3 story 30' *3- 4 stories & higher FLOOR AREA VILLAS 5*4*5 2500 SF/Lot 16' N/A 0' H 10' P 0' GC 10' P 0' GC 2 7' MINIMUM (S.F.) 1200 1000 900 750 900 SITE DEPTH AVERAGE: Determined by dividing the site area by the site width. SITE WIDTH: The average distance between straight lines connecting front and rear parcel lines at each side of the site, measured as straight lines between the foremost points of the side parcel lines in the front (at the point of the intersection with the front parcel line) and the rearmost point of the parcel lines at the rear (point of intersection with the rear parcel line). May be reduced on cul-de-sac lots. (Revised 4/11/07) 21 9.C.7 a Packet Pg. 1240 P. Perimeter of Internal Sites GC = Golf Course, or Lake Front Sites *1 This setback may be reduced to 10' for side entry garage *2 Three story maximum within the City of Naples for less than 8 units per acre. Four story maximum within the City of Naples for 8 units per acre or greater. *3 or % the sum of the adjacent buildings, whichever is greater. The following sentence applies to the Southeast Quadrant only. Where adjacent multi -family buildings are clustered about a common access to garage parking or courtyards, and share a common architectural theme and are a minimum of 2 stories in height, the minimum distance between the buildings shall be 40% of the sum to the heights of the two multi -family buildings. *4 During the County approval process, tracts shall be designated and approved as a specific category. The approved specific category shall not be changed unless the entire tract is consistent with the new category. Any change from an approved category to another shall be accomplished per the LDC. *5 In the context here used, the term "villas" means development that occurs on a platted lot where the lots tend to form a clustered home siting scheme accessed by an irregularly shaped private roadway system. *6 For patio homes with less than a 5 foot side yard setback, the opposite side setback shall be sufficient so that the combined setbacks equal 10 feet. Once the first building, on the side of a street utilizing this product type is permitted, all subsequent buildings shall follow the pattern established by the first unit. For example, a 3 foot setback on one lot must be followed by a 7 foot setback on the next lot or vice versa. (Revised 4/11/07) 22 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1241 SECTION IV GOLF COURSE/RECREATION/PARK/RIGHT-OF-WAY 4.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for the areas designated on Map H-1 Planned Unit Development Master Plan as, golf course, clubhouse, driving range, right-of-ways; dedicated easements and utility corridors. 4.02 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1) Golf Course(s) 2) Tennis Club and facilities 3) Water management facilities; essential services (in accordance with the LDC). Lakes, including lakes with seawall and other types of architectural bank treatment. 4) Open space recreational activities, community parks, and similar uses, including but not limited to shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, swimming pools, boat docks and ramp, canoe launches, fishing piers, boat storage, beach gazebos, concession stands, health trails, bike paths and nature trails, observation platforms, boardwalks, playground, picnic areas and other types of facilities intended for outdoor recreation. 5) Community center/clubhouse(s). 6) Storage, maintenance yards, and landscaping nurseries within FP&L easements, rights-of-way, and open space. Subject to approval of the persons or entities in whose favor the easement or right-of-way runs. 7) Project Information and Sales Center. 8) Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible in the district. (Revised 4/11/07) 23 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1242 B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Standards Accessory uses customarily associated with the principal uses permitted in this district including but not limited to: 1) Pro -shop, practice driving range, cart barn and other customary accessory uses of golf courses, or other recreational facilities, including maintenance area, and pump houses, golf courses rain shelters, restrooms, and snack bars. 2) Small commercial establishments, including gift shops, golf and tennis equipment sales, restaurants, cocktail lounges, and similar uses intended to serve patrons of the golf course or other permitted recreational facilities, subject to the provisions of the applicable supplementary district regulations of the Land Development Code of Collier County. 3) Vehicle wash facility. 4.03 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1) Overall site design shall be harmonious in terms of landscaping, enclosure of structures, location of access streets and parking areas and location and treatment of buffer areas. 2) Buildings shall be set back a minimum of ten (10') feet from parcel boundaries, except for common boundaries between golf course, recreation and park uses, and water management facilities, in which case the setback is zero (0') feet. 3) Maximum height of structures: Fifty (50') feet, unless abutting a residentially zoned parcel, then thirty five (35') feet. 4) Minimum distance between principal buildings: Five (5) feet — 1 and 2 story buildings that are a part of an architecturally unified grouping of structures. Ten (10') feet — 1 story. Twenty (20') feet — 2 story. 5) Setback for structures from parcel boundaries abutting residential areas: Twenty (20') feet — principal structures. (Revised 4/11/07) 24 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1243 Ten (10') feet — accessory structures. 6) Parking for the community center/clubhouse shall be one space per every two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area, which shall be considered inclusive of required golf course parking. 7) Standards for parking, landscaping, signs, guard houses, entrance gates and other land uses not specified herein are to be in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code regulations in effect at the time permits are requested unless otherwise specified herein. Unless otherwise indicated, setback, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. 8) A 10 -foot wide combination berm, landscaping, and wall buffer shall be provided along the south side of the FPL easement paralleling Golden Gate Parkway within the northwest quadrant adjacent to golf course and residential uses. The berm shall be no higher than 2 feet and the wall no higher than 8 feet. Landscaping shall be placed in front of the wall screening a minimum of 50% of the wall. An additional 10 - foot landscape buffer shall be placed along the north edge of the FPL easement where said easement abuts golf course or residential uses. Golf course is allowed within the 10 -foot wide buffer. (Revised 4/11107) 25 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1244 SECTION V CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE AREAS 5.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for areas designated on Map H-1 as conservation and open space. 5.02A PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES -- CONSERVATION AREAS No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1) Passive recreational areas, boardwalks, observation platforms. 2) Biking, hiking, health and nature trails, canoe launches, golf cart paths. 3) Water management facilities, roadway crossings and utility crossings. 4) Lighting and signage. 5) Any other activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible with the intent of this district. 5.0213 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES — OPEN SPACE AREAS No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1) Parks, passive recreational areas, boardwalks, observation platforms. 2) Biking, hiking, health and nature trails, boat docks, fishing piers, canoe launches, boat storage, golf cart paths. 3) Equestrian paths. 4) Water management facilities and lakes, as approved by the South Florida Water Management District, roadway crossings and utility crossings. 5) Recreational shelters, active park facilities, and restrooms, off street parking, lighting and signage. (Revised 4/11/07) 26 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1245 6) Any other activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible with the intent of this district. 5.03 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1) Overall site design shall be harmonious with the area's natural characteristics 2) All work proposed in wetland areas designated on the Master Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Collier County Environmental Staff and appropriate county, state or federal regulatory or jurisdictional agency prior to the commencement of any such activity. 3) The County may request copies of permits from all appropriate regulatory agencies or jurisdictional agency prior to construction plan approval. Conservation areas shall be subject to jurisdictional agencies review and listed uses do not guarantee that those uses will be approved. 4) Standards for parking, landscaping, signs, guard houses, entrance gates and other land uses not specified herein are to be in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code regulations in effect at the time permits are requested unless otherwise specified herein. (Revised 4/11/07) 27 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1246 SECTION VI COMMERCIAL 6.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to set forth the regulation for the area designated on Map H-1 MPUD Master Plan, as "C" Commercial "O/C" Office Commercial, "O" Office, and "Town Center". These are areas located within a designated activity center, therefore permitted uses for these tracts are intended to be inclusive of all types allowed by the City of Naples and the Collier County LDC. 6.02 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1) Permitted Principal Uses and Structures for C, O/C, and Town Center Tracts: (a) Antique shops; appliance stores; art studios; art supply shops; automobile parts stores; automobile service stations without repairs*1; awning shops. (b) Bakery shops including baking; bait and tackle shops*2; banks and financial institutions, including drive-in windows; barber and beauty shops; bath supply stores; bicycle sales and services; blueprint shops; bookbinder; book stores; business machine services; business offices, building maintenance services and building supplies. (c) Cabinet shops, canteen services, building maintenance services, building supplies, carpet and floor covering sales — which may include storage and installation; car wash; child care centers; churches and other places of worship *1; clothing stores; cocktail lounges*1; commercial schools; confectionery and candy stores, concessions and vendors; civic and cultural facilities colleges, universities and schools; convalescent centers and nursing homes; computer sales and services*2. (d) Delicatessens; department stores; drug stores; dry cleaning, collecting and delivery; dry goods stores; drapery shops; department stores. (e) Electrical supply stores; express office; employment agencies; equipment rentals repair and sales including lawn mowers and power saws. (f) Farmers market*2, fish stores — retail only; florist shops; fraternal and social clubs*1; food markets; furniture stores; furrier shops. (g) Garden supply stores — outside display in side and rear yards*2; gift shops; glass and mirror sales — including storage and installation; gourmet shops; gunsmiths. (Revised 4/11/07) 28 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1247 (h) Hardware stores; health food store; homes for the aged; hospitals and hospices; hobby supply stores. (i) ice cream stores, indoor commercial recreation, interior decorating showrooms. Q) Jewelry stores. (k) Laundries; laboratories, film research and testing; leather goods; luggage stores; linen supply shops; lithograph; laboratories; liquor stores; locksmiths; lakes and water bodies with seawalls and architectural bank treatments, or conventional lake banks. (1) Markets — food; markets — meat; medical offices and clinics; millinery shops; motion picture theaters; museums; music stores; mortgage brokers. (m) New car dealerships — outside display permitted; news stores; night clubs*2*1. (n) Office — general — business, and professional; office supply stores. (o) Paint and wall paper stores; post offices; pet shops; photographic equipment stores; pottery stores*2; printing*2; publishing and mimeograph service shops*2; private clubs*2*1; plumbing shops and supplies. (p) Radio, television and appliance sales and services; radio stations (offices and studios), and auxiliary transmitters and receiving equipments, but not principal transmission tower; research design and development; real estate offices; rest homes; restaurants — including drive-in or fast food restaurants and full service *1; retail sales of used goods; all uses permitted in Section III and IV of this Document — subject to development standards identified in those Sections. (q) Small scale retail sales other than shopping centers; shoe sales and repair; shopping centers*1; souvenir stores; stationery stores; supermarkets; sanatoriums. (r) Tailor shops; taxidermists; tile sales — ceramic tile; tobacco shops; toy shops; tropical fish stores; telephone exchange shops; transportation, communication and utility offices. (s) Variety stores; vehicle rentals, veterinarian offices and clinics — no outside kennels. (t) Watch and precision instrument sales and repair shops. (Revised 4/11/07) 29 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1248 (u) Any other commercial use or professional service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible in the district. (v) Any other commercial uses set forth in the City of Naples Development Agreement. 2) Permitted Uses and Structures for "O" (Office) Tracts: (a) Art studios (b) Banks and financial institutions, including drive-in windows; book stores; business offices. (c) Child care centers; churches and other places of worship; commercial schools; civic and cultural facilities; colleges, universities and schools. (d) Express office; employment agencies. (e) Fraternal and social clubs"1. (f) Homes for the aged; hospitals and hospices. (g) Laboratories; lakes and water bodies with seawalls and architectural bank treatments, or conventional lake banks. (h) Medical offices and clinics; mortgage brokers. (i) Office — general — business, and professional; office supply stores. 0) Private clubs*2. (k) Radio stations (offices and studios, and auxiliary transmitters and receiving equipment, but not principal transmission tower); research design and development; real estate offices; all uses permitted in Section III and IV of this document — subject to development standards identified in those Sections. (1) Transportation, communication and utility offices. (m) Veterinarian offices and clinics — no outside kennels. (n) Any other commercial use or professional service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Collier County Planning Services Manager or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible in the district. (Revised 4/11/07) 30 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1249 3) Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures; Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this district. (a) Caretaker's residence*1 6.03 Development Standards 1) Minimum Lot Area: Ten thousand (10,000) square feet. 2) Minimum Lot Width: One hundred feet (100') 3) Minimum Setback Requirements (internal): (a) Front setback — Twenty feet (20'). (b) Side setback — None, or a minimum of five feet (5) with unobstructed passage from front to rear yard. (c) Rear setback — Fifteen feet (16). (d) Waterfront setback — Zero feet (0') to seawall, bulkhead, or rip rap, otherwise fifteen feet (16). (e) Parcels with two frontages may reduce one front setback by ten feet (10'). 4) Minimum setbacks and buffer from external rights-of-way: (a) Golden Gate Parkway — Fifty foot (50') setback, Twenty foot (20') landscape buffer. (b) Airport Road and Livingston Road — Twenty foot (20') plus two feet (2') for every one foot (1') of building height; twenty foot (20') landscape buffer. 5) Maximum Height: Fifty (50) feet. 6) Minimum Floor Area of Structures: One thousand (1,000 square feet per building) on the ground floor. Kiosk vendors, concessions, and temporary or mobile sales structures are permitted to have a minimum structure of twenty-five (25) square feet, and are not bound by setback requirements. 7) Maximum Floor Area Ratios (FAR) for Commercial Uses: Based on gross leaseable floor area (GLFA) and acreage. Retail: Office: (Revised 4/11/07) 30 Project total 649,638 GLFA 35 Project total 653,453 Gross Floor Area 31 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1250 8) Distance Between Structures: Same as for side yard setback. 9) Standards for parking, landscaping, signs, guard houses, entrance gates and other land uses not specified herein are to be in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code regulations in effect at the time permits are requested unless otherwise specified herein. Unless otherwise indicated, setback, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. 10) A twenty-five (25) foot landscape strip of land shall be provided along all arterial road commercial frontages. 11) The public internal loop road in the Northeast quadrant shall be constructed in accordance with Collier County standards. 12) An 8 -foot high wall may be installed on grade, on a landscape berm, on golf course mounding, or on driving range mounding, within a residential, golf course, club, golf facility or commercial parcel to buffer the commercial uses from the residential and other uses. *1 In accordance with LDC requirements for this type of use. *2 Northeast and Southeast quadrants only. (Revised 4/11/07) 32 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1251 SECTION VII GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 7.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments of the project. 7.02 MPUD MASTER PLAN 1) The P.U.D. Master Plan — Map H-1 is an illustrative preliminary development plan. The design criteria and layout illustrated on the Master Plan shall be understood to be flexible, so that, the final design may satisfy project criteria and comply with all applicable requirements of this Ordinance. 2) All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities. 3) Site design changes shall be permitted subject to Collier County and/or City of Naples staff administrative approval, where such changes are consistent with the intent of this MPUD and do not cause significant impact to surrounding properties abutting the Grey Oaks MPUD. 7.03 ENVIRONMENTAL 1) The developer shall be subject to Collier County Growth Management Plan Conservation and Coastal Management Element and applicable County ordinances. The 25% shall be monitored at each site clearing plan submittal. The developer shall receive credit from any phase where the 25% amount is exceeded to be applied to a phase where it is not. In any phase of development where credit toward the 25% is needed the developer shall delineate on the site clearing plan the percentage of viable naturally functioning native vegetation retained and/or areas of landscaping and open space which are planted with native species. The developer shall show the calculations on each site clearing plan which totals the overall 25% for the project build -out. The entire MPUD has been evaluated for native/viable vegetation at the time of platting or site development plan approval and such vegetated area has been determined to be 551.94 acres. This includes 13.31 acres of native vegetation within the Golden Gate Parkway right-of-way. The total assumes that the eastern -most parcel in the southeast quadrant contains 15.03 acres of native vegetation. [Preserving 25% requires 137.99 acres while 137.10 acres of native vegetation has been preserved.] The eastern -most parcel in the southeast quadrant shall provide .89 acres of native vegetation preserve to satisfy the 25% preservation requirement stipulated in Paragraph 7.03.1 above. See Drawings (Revised 4/11/07) 33 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1252 E-1 through E-4 locations of native vegetation. The required retained native vegetation shown on the preserve drawings, Exhibits E-1 through E-4 may be modified administratively by the Environmental Review Staff, providing that an equal area of existing native vegetation of equal or greater habitat value is provided in a preserve area that meets the requirements of the LDC in effect at the time of any such modification. To accomplish this, the property owner shall apply to the County and obtain approval for an amendment to the underlying SDP or plat and construction plans. 2) The developer shall obtain all necessary local, state and federal permits. Copies of appropriate jurisdictional delineations are required at the time of subdivision master pian per the County Engineer. 3) Protected plant species (butterfly orchid) and those which may be observed during each construction phase shall be protected from injury or relocated on site. The existing locations as well as the transplantation locations, if warranted, shall be identified on the site clearing plan for each phase of construction. 4) The developer must receive all appropriate state approvals for storing and handling hazardous materials prior to construction of the golf maintenance facilities. All hazardous materials will be stored in a central location, removed from the Gordon River headwaters or Golden Gate Canal. There will be no storage of hazardous materials that is in excess of two (2) days supply, at the satellite facilities. However, petroleum storage at these facilities shall be allowed, but only in above ground storage facilities constructed and maintained in accordance with EPA and FDER standards. The developer shall submit any required contingency plans approved by appropriate state and federal agencies for clean up and mitigation of unauthorized release of hazardous materials. 5) Buffers around protected wetlands shall comply with South Florida Water Management District criteria. 6) Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Rules and Regulations, as well as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permitting program. Removal of exotic vegetation shall not be the sole means of mitigation for impacts to Collier County jurisdictional wetlands. 7) All conservation areas shall be recorded on the plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Conservation areas shall be dedicated on the plat to the project's homeowners' association, or like entity, for ownership and maintenance responsibilities, and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance. (Revised 4/11/07) 34 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1253 8) An exotic vegetation eradication, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic free) plan for the site, with emphasis on conservation/preservation areas, shall be submitted to the Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 9) The developer shall coordinate protected wildlife species issues through the ERP and Corps Section 404 permit review process and comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) made part of any ERP or Section 404 permit issuance. Where protected species occur on site, a Habitat Management Plan for those protected species shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 7.04 WATER MANAGEMENT 1) Detailed, paving, grading and site drainage plans shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by Engineering Review Services. 2) In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District, (SFWMD) Chapters 40E-4 and 40E-40, this project shall be designed for a storm event of 3 -day duration and 25 -year return frequency. 3) An excavation permit shall be required for the proposed lake(s) in accordance with applicable County ordinances and SFWMD Rules. Several of the lakes proposed do not meet the minimum setback requirements of County ordinances. The Master Plan shall be revised to meet the minimum setback requirements or documentation shall be provided during the subdivision master plan process to allow a reduction in the setback with appropriate barriers provided. 4) The lake and swale typical cross-sections shall conform to all applicable County ordinances. 5) Detailed site drainage plans of each drainage sub -basin shall be submitted to the Environmental Advisory Board, or its successor, for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of each individual drainage sub - basin is granted by the Engineering Review Services. 6) An executed agreement between the applicant, Big Cypress Basin and the South Florida Water Management District, detailed plans and associated documentation relating to the installation of the new control structure and the relocation of the existing amil gate structure including back pump facilities shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services for review prior to construction plan approval. (Revised 4/11/07) 35 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1254 7) A copy of the South Florida Water Management District Conceptual Permit or favorable staff report shall be required prior to subdivision master plan approval. 8) A copy of South Florida Water Management District Permit or Early Work Permit is required prior to construction plan approval. 9) Documentation from Florida Power and Light allowing use of their right-of-way for the purposes of water management shall be provided prior to subdivision master plan approval. 10) This approval does not constitute agreement by the County to any control elevation or discharge rate. All agreements shall be made with South Florida Water Management District/Big Cypress Basin. 7.05 TRANSPORTATION 1) The developer shall provide appropriate left and/or right turn lanes on Airport Road, Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road at all project accesses. This provision shall be permitted and implemented along with a corresponding site development plan or plat. 2) The developer shall provide arterial level street lighting at all project accesses. This provision shall be permitted and implemented a long with a corresponding site development plan or plat. 3) The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of traffic signals, including interconnection where applicable, at any project access when deemed warranted by the County. The signals will be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. 4) Livingston Road Right of Way Dedication: a) The developer shall dedicate sufficient right of way north of Golden Gate Parkway to establish a right-of-way corridor 120 feet in width along the entire length of the developer's property, taking into consideration the existing Livingston Road right-of-way easement. Additional right-of-way within the Florida Power and Light easement may be required subject to approval and releases by Florida Power and Light. The developer shall pay, or may utilize reduction of existing impact fee credits in the amount of $30,000 in full satisfaction of the developer's obligation to reimburse the County for the County's costs in negotiating and obtaining any approval and releases by Florida Power and Light necessary to fulfill the 120 foot right-of-way width requirements. b) The developer shall dedicate 50' feet or road right of way south of Golden Gate Parkway along the length of the developer's property. In addition, for a (Revised 4/11/07) 36 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1255 9.C.7 distance of 200 feet south of Golden Gate Parkway, the developer shall dedicate an additional 50 feet in width immediately west of the aforementioned right-of-way. Said additional 50 feet in width may be in the form of a 25 foot wide road right-of-way dedication and 25 foot wide easement for drainage, water management, landscaping, and bikepath use. For the next 800 feet south of Golden Gate Parkway, the developer shall dedicate a strip of land tapering from 50 feet in width in the north to 0 feet in width in the south, in a diminishing line immediately west of the aforementioned right-of-way. Said additional property shall, to the extent it exceeds 25 feet, be in the form of an easement for drainage, water management, landscaping, and bikepath use. The "easements" (as opposed to the dedications) specified herein may be used to satisfy all or part of the setback, and buffer requirements for the adjacent property. The land to be dedicated by the developer, as described above, consists of a total of 3.891 acres, and is identical to parcels 137 and 937 which are the subject of a Stipulated Order of Taking, dated July 24, 1998, entered in Collier County Circuit Court Case No. 98-1635 CA. The developer and County agree that the developer shall be entitled to impact fee credits for the 3.891 acres comprising parcels 137 and 937 at the rate of $85,000 per acre for a total credit of $330,735 for this additional land dedication. c) The requirement in Grey Oaks DRI Development Order 90-3 at paragraph 5.c. (iv) that the applicant build Livingston Road from Golden Gate Parkway south to the beginning of the northern approach to the bridge over the Golden Gate Canal (based upon the cost of a two lane rural roadway) shall be fully satisfied by the reduction of existing or future impact fee credits, in the amount of One Hundred Eighty -Five Thousand Dollars ($185,000). 5) The developer shall dedicate 40 feet of right-of-way along the north side of Golden Gate Parkway west of Airport Road along the entire length of the developer's property, shall incorporate the Golden Gateway Parkway drainage into the water management system of the developer's project, and shall accept all drainage from both a quality and quantity standpoint. 6) The developer shall dedicate 40 feet for right of way on each side of Golden Gate Parkway between Airport Road and Livingston Road within four (4) months of a written request from the County. 7) Collier County reserves the right to expand the lanes on Airport Road by adjusting the cross section of the existing canal to incorporate road run off in the lake system. 8) The developer shall dedicate sufficient right-of-way at the intersection of Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to allow a grade separated urban interchange with Golden Gateway Parkway being the grade separated roadway. (Revised 4/11/07) 37 Packet Pg. 1256 9) All traffic control devices used, excluding street name signs, shall conform with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as required by Chapter 316.0747, Florida Statues. 10) If Collier County adopts a proportionate share or area -wide transportation assessment program, or modifies its Impact Fee Ordinance, to provide additional credit for right-of-way dedication, the developer shall be entitled to such a credit towards the 25 acres more or less of dedication. It is understood that the total amount of land involved in these dedications is equal to 25 acres more or less. 11) The number, type, and location of, and allowable changes to project access intersections with County roads shall be as set forth in Exhibit D-1 to the Grey Oaks DRI/Grey Oaks Development Order. 12) Impact fee payments shall be made to Collier County pursuant to the Impact Fee Ordinance in effect at the time of relevant permit application. 13) The County and the developer shall explore whether it would be in their individual best interests and mutual advantage for the developer to incorporate some of the storm water discharge from Golden Gate Parkway into the water management system for the southeastern quadrant of Grey Oaks. In the event the parties agree that it is in their respective best interest, cost sharing or impact fee credits may be used to recompense the developer for costs associated with said conveyance or storage. 7.06 UTILITIES 1) The water distribution system and appurtenant facilities to serve the project shall be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained pursuant to the requirements of the City of Naples. 2) The sewage collection, transmission and treatment and disposal facilities to serve the portions of the project on the west side of Airport Road shall be designed, construction, conveyed, owned, and maintained pursuant to the requirements of the City of Naples. 3) Provisions for sewer service to those portions of the project lying on the east side of Airport Road shall be as follows, unless a service area modification is approved between the City of Naples and the Collier County Water -Sewer District prior to the submissions of subdivision master plan applications to Collier County for the project. a) The sewage collection and transmission and interim sewage treatment facilities to serve the portions of the project on the east side of Airport (Revised 4/11/07) 38 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1257 Road are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with applicable county ordinances and regulations. b) All customers connecting to the sewage collection facilities to be constructed will be customers of the County and will be billed by the County in accordance with the County's established rates. Should the County not be in a position to provide sewer service to the project, the sewer customers shall be customers of the interim utility established to serve the project until the County's off-site water and/or sewer facilities are available to serve the project. C) It is anticipated that the County Utilities Division will ultimately receive and treat the sewage generated by this project. Should the County system not be in a position to receive the project's wastewater, at the time development commences (that generates wastewater), the developer, at its expense will install and operate interim on-site sewage treatment and disposal facilities adequate to meet all requirements of the appropriate regulatory agencies. An agreement shall be entered into between the County and the developer, its assigns or successors, regarding any interim treatment facilities to be utilized. The agreement must be legally sufficient to the County, prior to the approval of construction documents for the project and be in conformance with applicable County ordinances. d) The utility construction documents for the project's sewerage system shall be prepared to contain the design and construction of the on-site force main, which will ultimately connect the project to the future central sewerage facilities of the District in the Airport Road rights-of-way. The force main must be extended from the main on-site pump station site to the east right-of-way line of Airport Road and capped. It shall be interconnected to the pump station with appropriately located valves to permit for simple redirection of the project's sewage when connection to the County's central sewer facilities becomes available. e) Prior to the approval of construction documents that provide for development that generates wastewater by the County, the developer shall present verification pursuant to Chapter 367, Florida Statutes, that the Florida Public Service Commission has granted territorial rights to the developer to provide the service through its sewer facilities. f) The project's developer(s), their assigns or successors shall negotiate an Agreement with the Collier County Water -Sewer District for the use of treated sewage effluent within the project limits for irrigation purposes. The developer shall be responsible for providing all on-site piping and pumping facilities from the County's point of delivery to the project and negotiate with the County to provide full or partial on-site storage facilities, (Revised 4/11/07) 39 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1258 as required by the DEP, consistent with the volume of treated wastewater to be utilized. g) All subdivision master plans shall identify the location of interim wastewater treatment facilities required. In addition, documentation shall be provided to verify that the site is of adequate size for the facility intended. 7.07 SIGNAGE 1) General a) All County sign regulations shall apply unless such regulations are in conflict with the conditions set forth in this section. b) For the purpose of this MPUD Document/Ordinance, each platted parcel shall be considered a separate parcel of land and shall be entitled to any sign as permitted herein. C) Should any of the signs be requested be placed within the public right-of- way, a right-of-way permit shall be applied for and approved. d) All signs shall be located so as not to cause sight distance problems. 2) Entrance Signs a) Two (2) signs with a maximum area of 60 square feet each or one (1) sign with a maximum area of 100 square feet shall be permitted at each entrance of the development. b) Entrance signs shall not exceed a height of fifteen (15) feet above the finished ground level of the sign site. c) Entrance signs may be lighted provided all lights are shielded. 3) Project Signs a) Project signs, designed to promote the project, or any major use within the project shall be permitted along the east and west sides of Airport Road, the north and south side of Golden Gate Parkway, and the west side of Livingston Road, and on all tracts within the Grey Oaks MPUD limits subject to the following conditions: (Revised 4/11/07) 40 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1259 Project signs shall not exceed a height of twenty (20) feet above the finished ground level of the sign site nor shall the overall area of the sign face exceed one hundred (100) square feet. A maximum of fourteen (14) project signs shall be permitted. Six (6) located along Airport Road frontage, four (4) each located along Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road frontage. The location of such signs shall generally be limited to a one-quarter mile spacing requirement unless existing vegetation requires a closer spacing. An additional 5 intersection signs shall be permitted at the intersections of Golden Gate Parkway with Airport Road and Livingston Road. iii. Project signs may be lighted provided all lights are shielded. 7.08 ENGINEERING 1) Detailed paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by Engineering Review Services. 2) Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County Ordinances regulating subdivisions, unless otherwise approved as an exception to said regulations during subdivision approval. 3) Platting shall be accomplished when required by Collier County Ordinances regulating subdivisions. 4) Work within Collier County right-of-way shall meet the requirements of the applicable County ordinance. 5) Internal access into tracts as shown on the MPUD Master Plan is informational only. Exact locations shall be determined during subdivision or site development plan approval. 7.09 EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVSION REGULATIONS Exceptions to subdivision regulations shall be requested at the time of application for subdivision approval in accordance with applicable subdivision regulations in effect at the time of development. 7.10 SCHOOL DISTRICT (Revised 4/91/07) 41 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1260 The applicant shall dedicate a fifteen (15) acre school site to the Collier County School District at a location (off-site) agreed upon between the developer and the School District. 7.11 FIRE STATION/EMS SITE The developer has conveyed a 1.5 acre site for use by the North Naples and the East Naples Fire Districts, together with Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department. The site was conveyed in fee simple, subject to the following conditions: 1) The site shall revert to the owner, or subsequent owner, if it is not utilized for a fire and rescue facility for at least five (5) years. 2) If either fire district or the Emergency Medical Services Department adopts impact fees the developer shall be entitled to impact fee credit for the dedicated site based on the fair market value on the date of dedication. 7.12 AFFORDABLE HOUSING Naples Grande Holdings, LLC shall commit to providing $1,000 per approved residential dwelling unit located within property controlled by Naples Grande Holdings, LLC. Payment shall be made to the Collier County Affordable Housing Trust Fund at the time issuance of the certificate of occupancy. This $1,000 shall be credited toward any additional affordable housing linkage fees that may be in effect at the time of site development plan approval. 7.13 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT The developer, its successors in interest, and all future assigns or designees, shall adhere to all commitments made in the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Application for Development Approvals (ADA), sufficiency responses, and attachments for this amendment and all previously adopted DRI Development Order (DO) actions for this project. (Revised 4/11/07) 42 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1261 9.C.7 T" PUDA-200h-AR-10157 REV: 1 Prujec:t: 19990283 Date: 7/24i'2O06 nt I T: - u;,,, IQApLe'15S GNAW 179 E mm T GONCOPTUAI- ,ANP P; -AN 0 100 400 No :VlISt?:TlV ijiA'; fl!,sig (; Packet Pg. 1262 lsom g as (%!d. M eC11 rnlww WfalfalfJa rtonc n YL 1Clilfe .t nl�a r � N wmrru� vnrw �»�w •ir N anw crc rr.rae.i win-rnar�ern � N 4sau/rrna is wta�� - cru u•s r w�r..��r ■ ��....m .rw Mao p .uu�acm -► ren ai ro ww* en 'y ar:r ■ r wm em u wtn wts �sr � .cm ary 1ffiJiiQ •rrenrt wrR/ta� awrtou uia ii ewtt wast �rr'in v rar r,�r�r cr.rnw. cwewam u•ao v� �aw wx v�n�u eta 9.C.7 { iq a FM r' �1 Ord ral U) Y 0 C7 yr R a+ _N .fC N I- T - CD O O O I- r O N J a M CD O r O U .Q Q a LL E a r U r { Q Packet Pg. 1263 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2007-40 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 24th day of April, 2007, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 30th day of April, 2007. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and~�ierk Ex -officio to Board of County Commissioners By: Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1264 9.C.7 CHARLIE CRIST Governor June 15, 2007 %WME FLORIDA DEPARTMENT 0 STATE STATE LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES OF FLORIDA Honorable Dwight E. Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples, Florida 34101-3044 Attention: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk Dear Mr. Brock: KURT S. BROWNING Secretary of State Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your letters dated June 13, 2007, and copies of Exhibits E-1 through E-4 of Collier County Ordinance No. 2007-40 which was filed in this office on May 1, 2007 and Exhibit "A" of Collier County Ordinance No. 2007-41, which was filed in this office on April 27, 2007. As requested, one date stamped copy of each is being returned for your records. Sincerely, Y4�5c �" Liz Cloud Program Administrator LC/lbh Enclosure DIRECTOR'S OFFICE R. A. Gray Building . 500 South Bronough Street . Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 850.245.6600 . FAX: 850.245.6735 . TDD: 850.922.4085 . http:7/dlis.dosst2tt.l.US COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STATE LIBRARY OF FLORIDA STATE ARCHIVES OF FLORIDA 850.245.6600 . FAX: 850.245.6643 850.245.6600 . FAX: 850.245.6744 850.245.6700 . FAX: 950 488.4894 LEGISLATIVE LIBRARY SERVICE RECORDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AND WEEKLY 850.488.2812 . FAX: 850.488.9879 850.245.6750 . FAX: 850,245.6795 850.245.6270 . FAX: 850 245 6282 Packet Pg. 1265 9 Dwight E. Brock Clerk of Courts June 13, 2007 bounty of Collier CLERK OF THE CtRCU�T COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 . NAPLES, FLORIDA 14 10 1 -3044 Ms. Karlyn Solis Department of State Bureau of Administrative Code RA Gray Building Room 101 500 S. Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Re: Ordinance Number: 2007-40 Dear Ms. Solis: 9.C.7 Clerk of Courts Accountant Auditor Custodian of County Funds Transmitted herewith for the record are Exhibits E-1 thru E-4 that were inadvertently omitted from Collier County Ordinance 2007-40. The ordinance with the enclosed exhibits, were adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on Tuesday, April 24, 2007, during Regular Session. Please place these exhibits with the Ordinance 2007-40 that was filed with you office on May 1, 2007. Thank you. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk Enclosure(s) Phone- (239) 732-2646 Website- www.clerk.collier.fl.us This ordinance filed with the Secretary of $tote's Office the 14'day of .luny. , 26V-7 and acknowledgement f that filingreceived this 1E day -, of ufl By, J Fax -(239)775-2755 Email- collierelerk(a-,clerk.eollier.fl.us Packet Pg. 1266 MEMORANDUM (VIA E-MAIL) DATE: May 30, 2007 TO: Trish Morgan, Board Minutes and Records Manager FROM: Kay D©lens, Principal Pianner SUBJECT: Grey Oaks MPUD Ordinance No. 07-40 On April 24, 2007, the Board approved Grey Oaks MPUD (Ordinance No. 07-40) and the. ordinance was filed with the Secretary of State on May 1, 2007. It has come to my attention that Exhibits E-1 through E-4, which were presented and approved by the Board, were inadvertently lett out of the package that was delivered to the Clerk's Office for filing with the Secretary of State's Office. Therefore, I am requesting that the attached Exhibits I:-1 through E-4 be filed with the Secretary of State. Should you require any additional information, please do no hesitate to call. 'thank you. c: Marjorie M. Student -Stirling, Assistant County Attorney 07-crs-00574121 9.C.7 O t9 T) x rn N I -- CD O 0 ti 0 N J a rn Cl) t0 c 0 R .Q Q. Q LL c a� E t ca Q r c m E t .r a Packet Pg. 1267 9.C.7 M IJAIF1iD . m(INDARy---•--- XATIVfl VFLERATLON - NATIVE VEGERATIGN WER$N CONSF3VAt H1H FA4EMENE NATTVEVEOERATION REMOVED DI GOLDEN GAT D Y[WY nvaNTYHamIEly 7,-=TTE 7mla, M S FS FUR DETEF" THE QUANTITY OF HATIM QI CREy DANS' THREEAS rO NORTHEAST - A FLAN PREPARED FIR HALSTATT PARTNERSHIP, LIE, DAIS PHASE I -A GOLF MAtSE, PUD - 23X G CLEARIPLA/ OORE RTHD. PREPARED IVY VASDI MILLER W711k, SaL, L PEEX DE- DATED OCT. 1990 - COPY DNCLUIEL MOST OF AIRPORT - IN FCFOArMN FM NATIVE Vr.CETATMI TAKEN FIOI SFVU PERNIT PLANS SUBMITTED TR NAPIIS CMF COORS£ POLDHGS'LTA FUR OEy CAIDI VEST. DATED FTI., YJ m PREPARD Dr VIUMN MILLER. SFV9m tmED PEIDaT 0-0100" ON ¢T. 1$ ML A COPY OF WE VE13M 993WTMN RELATTNI To NATEVE VEGETATTUN IS ENCLOSED. $WrAr i'T - cuum CuIRY snr/ wi6x APPRwED rETL L 1499' AS SHOWN ON 'fDBTROCTYM PLANS FIR NAPLES GPAOE GOLF IESQIF R. A DEVEL/EIR ly PA(TPERS GREY DW DPG' PREPARED lY YHLION KILLER, SIDED AND SEALED JAL W, 14991 SEI NOTES IM EASTERN -LOST PARCEL SUSTOHEAST OMPAIR FM OAANRT AS"FTOM. NOTES, L WIS PLAN A40 THE FOJ_OYOG PLANS POREVENT THE LOCATDNf OAKS /gym YErETAT;HNS BEENPRESERVED VI1HR1 THE GREY a THE AVOW OART DMATES rHE EMSS FDR THE CALLTMTHM VLTIOI EACH RLMdWR 1NO TIE WANTET' O F NATIVE VEEETAT13N nwr LS NEEDED TO lE isWXRV IX TLE TOTAL SPI/KMA D 'Eamt TO fREgFVE 0Y U' THE NATIVE VEGETATMK I �' �, s• _,[ f �•'� w� I TIED: CACLk-Ama DORCATE THAT THE NATIVE VDZTATEN i V RID QRE)*XTS HAVE DUN LET RR HE ENTIRE 6Ey OAKS PI} DK 1. A M THESE CALCULATIDS ANTICIPATE THAT THE VACANT PARCEL, DUOERDG LIVI MUN ROAD IN THE EAST PO TEN OF WE M/OEAST QMDRAHT ZMERN HOST PARCEL) CORALS 1ILM AESESS p a• +„ %� � f •y _ , i OF NATIVE VEGETATION p•`}PF�r� L N ; .'�� I .. J F[ ( y VL WITHINITS . SINCE ALL PARCELS y GREY IW.S HAVE REMVMAL arYELO0NT EoERs DINER WEAN THE EASTERN NIST R THE AID SDICF R O >FLII`hD / i i _' }%r 4 fM .P •.r . , -�+ i 1 3 THAT M NATIVE NWCTATID! FIR AN Ia OFA AJD HAS DEIN I _ VECETSATISITM IT 1S ER ATIO V PIAT ANY RQi FALL v NATIVE 1�T PARCEL -PIKSERVATIIN YELL DE fF1E9ATED FRbI t1aS EASTERN ,THra 'Q S THE EASTERN HOST PARCEL'& DEVELOPER HAS S I ITTED PLANS TO - � THE CQIRY INDICATING AN AREA SEATER THAN 0.89 ACRES OF 'r . -_ NATIVE VEGETATION VILL E PRII]NED. THm mummy O ,. - •; r: ,�.n- l syy:..fYs INCLUDED IN THE *NATIVE VEGETATION SAVE? CATETARY. .. IS aroa -NAPLES GRANDE HOLDINGS, LLC � NATIVE VQ:LTATDDA E-1 vmmN GREY Iva HrA`A. GREY OAKS _ 0 i R N a) N I` O O O r O N J a O M O r- 0 0 U .Q Q a LL 0 v d t V r Q Packet Pg, 1268 H M IJAIF1iD . m(INDARy---•--- XATIVfl VFLERATLON - NATIVE VEGERATIGN WER$N CONSF3VAt H1H FA4EMENE NATTVEVEOERATION REMOVED DI GOLDEN GAT D Y[WY nvaNTYHamIEly 7,-=TTE 7mla, M S FS FUR DETEF" THE QUANTITY OF HATIM QI CREy DANS' THREEAS rO NORTHEAST - A FLAN PREPARED FIR HALSTATT PARTNERSHIP, LIE, DAIS PHASE I -A GOLF MAtSE, PUD - 23X G CLEARIPLA/ OORE RTHD. PREPARED IVY VASDI MILLER W711k, SaL, L PEEX DE- DATED OCT. 1990 - COPY DNCLUIEL MOST OF AIRPORT - IN FCFOArMN FM NATIVE Vr.CETATMI TAKEN FIOI SFVU PERNIT PLANS SUBMITTED TR NAPIIS CMF COORS£ POLDHGS'LTA FUR OEy CAIDI VEST. DATED FTI., YJ m PREPARD Dr VIUMN MILLER. SFV9m tmED PEIDaT 0-0100" ON ¢T. 1$ ML A COPY OF WE VE13M 993WTMN RELATTNI To NATEVE VEGETATTUN IS ENCLOSED. $WrAr i'T - cuum CuIRY snr/ wi6x APPRwED rETL L 1499' AS SHOWN ON 'fDBTROCTYM PLANS FIR NAPLES GPAOE GOLF IESQIF R. A DEVEL/EIR ly PA(TPERS GREY DW DPG' PREPARED lY YHLION KILLER, SIDED AND SEALED JAL W, 14991 SEI NOTES IM EASTERN -LOST PARCEL SUSTOHEAST OMPAIR FM OAANRT AS"FTOM. NOTES, L WIS PLAN A40 THE FOJ_OYOG PLANS POREVENT THE LOCATDNf OAKS /gym YErETAT;HNS BEENPRESERVED VI1HR1 THE GREY a THE AVOW OART DMATES rHE EMSS FDR THE CALLTMTHM VLTIOI EACH RLMdWR 1NO TIE WANTET' O F NATIVE VEEETAT13N nwr LS NEEDED TO lE isWXRV IX TLE TOTAL SPI/KMA D 'Eamt TO fREgFVE 0Y U' THE NATIVE VEGETATMK I �' �, s• _,[ f �•'� w� I TIED: CACLk-Ama DORCATE THAT THE NATIVE VDZTATEN i V RID QRE)*XTS HAVE DUN LET RR HE ENTIRE 6Ey OAKS PI} DK 1. A M THESE CALCULATIDS ANTICIPATE THAT THE VACANT PARCEL, DUOERDG LIVI MUN ROAD IN THE EAST PO TEN OF WE M/OEAST QMDRAHT ZMERN HOST PARCEL) CORALS 1ILM AESESS p a• +„ %� � f •y _ , i OF NATIVE VEGETATION p•`}PF�r� L N ; .'�� I .. J F[ ( y VL WITHINITS . SINCE ALL PARCELS y GREY IW.S HAVE REMVMAL arYELO0NT EoERs DINER WEAN THE EASTERN NIST R THE AID SDICF R O >FLII`hD / i i _' }%r 4 fM .P •.r . , -�+ i 1 3 THAT M NATIVE NWCTATID! FIR AN Ia OFA AJD HAS DEIN I _ VECETSATISITM IT 1S ER ATIO V PIAT ANY RQi FALL v NATIVE 1�T PARCEL -PIKSERVATIIN YELL DE fF1E9ATED FRbI t1aS EASTERN ,THra 'Q S THE EASTERN HOST PARCEL'& DEVELOPER HAS S I ITTED PLANS TO - � THE CQIRY INDICATING AN AREA SEATER THAN 0.89 ACRES OF 'r . -_ NATIVE VEGETATION VILL E PRII]NED. THm mummy O ,. - •; r: ,�.n- l syy:..fYs INCLUDED IN THE *NATIVE VEGETATION SAVE? CATETARY. .. IS aroa -NAPLES GRANDE HOLDINGS, LLC � NATIVE VQ:LTATDDA E-1 vmmN GREY Iva HrA`A. GREY OAKS _ 0 i R N a) N I` O O O r O N J a O M O r- 0 0 U .Q Q a LL 0 v d t V r Q Packet Pg, 1268 9.C.7 M r.R•.•t � ti 4r' „ � d' , 5,.� 1 .a..l.,.-�,�' ,b -+�•. , m•, . �.,..,n+I;�.i, F�• �� . S r w+ t v y t ,� �• ♦ �st.n it IWO "'WSF ire i P Kzlti kAWOL 1"A f Lit 0-4 �� ' ` \'` .-`.L 'A„ - at >4 • NATNE vEp1.TAT1pN e' - �,...; j..,ti j(,Tr,•,.riJ�11 '�1t k,.', '�i' .�' �tr�-,, - ENMfM6FTVATgN �+►' ,d ;� j . �. A,..•! /^' ` T•r. f-'�ll.i�4 t' « - .w " _! `1.i�!''Y� ♦. r'�• •1 wit tri .. � SEI' � � �) �.n,4R y � ii. 1y ♦ 3cl, i° tAaA�'E'SrY� �.. �' f�. ,yM .�' + Y ��` � -mow' v • �9 t'Y46 "� �"tF 't• 1t �. '�. �1F� AI '� �� `j�'�R�,,_�_ .� f ": �.� `;� `5�,.-+.�y':. �'" '� +,�.>�`�' `f��}�-� � is �" ` � � 1'a a• �. ct GEED �T - -- w. �'"' . F• � ` r�1M4�'r '1 1r Y 5 �'� NATNE VEGEfATIOV—?�., f +{ BDUNOARY � � A • A � •! S \ \_ ) • ! WITNW CON9ERYAiiOV •� ,�, ♦ �q, ' fISEMEVT �4 .. .1YwTrvevEGslwrnaY *AP i � �' ►e � Y= �, .� ,y., • _� �. , � i• ..o - WW m mKOk� VATna1Y r1A. i.s _ a ,.,� :. � w" �� • \C `• - y "L '�"'7%�,� � t, -NA�TTvevEoPrA7pm . f' ��f..GMDENOAmp� r.1 11aEaver�rrs.'�' t •.» +! t fi. �+ At' lK° ° ma Ac ur AF x,a At i'•^)r:.. tom, i .+•. ! ii �.: R � �`'�•..?';�j� �—� ' N �` 1J •: AL O•A At A.E. .*'R* L •,y� `-.+' /i +�::• �� fes' 1a �.�I +�• W+ TOTAL SSL94 Ar- 137.99 Ac 13799 At r • "� •.. 7 .F ■.[ulOfE...O.D..,m.wrw.won..Y.�.�..: a.�.... • NA719LYKiM7M]NA>QA6 ®WN ON 0116 �OfI000011AEIIYNO•TB -�•. i r�Axtir u aAni��TAuv+a.tmmEN-rffinonaoroana _ -•:. ` ' � . •.pft'' /°.. p anm me mm NAPLES GRMUE HOLDINGS, LLL AIATrvc VF$TAT= - MMM E-2 .r... w�..,. �.I•..w-vim._ _....a..,. -- - AEA (E 1 43p ff1EAYf t1N1@AG _ .n - I. le- .v w.�1 re _ .moi •meav nT rAw....�...,....M..��..«.. GREY OAKS FIXL 2T4 i i N Y IC 0 i t. .N R a) N I- CD - O r O N J a O M CD C O fC U .Q Q LL c a� V 41 t V m r+ a Packet Pg. 1269 9.C.7 Ij �-' �'• �t ._ �` • ,.ice a j - •- � � !� E�EIIEMiNSFRY'ATIDN � iA't ` '•'"'�.. , 7- 41t •`, .P.,i �;"'.', �"� •..,moi Of n. �►{' r ; ..acv J..w\ ` u `� E _ . ! 'S - A•. �.! N� JI YS .. � dim ' ry Y NAPLES GRANDE HQLDINGS, LLC XATM VEKTATUM E -3 .m aumwT iA.raa�seR � GREY OAKS 0 i R a+ N IC C> N I- CD 0 I` T- 0 N J a rn M C 0 a U Q Q a LL V a c v r a Packet Pg. 1270 BOUNDNRT NATr4E VEGEPATWH NATIVE VEGUATMN �6ow vAnE EASPA( r NATIVE VEOETATION •' m REHOVEDDUR OOIDEN GATE PKWY n,BROVEMEM ' ,• ■� Ij �-' �'• �t ._ �` • ,.ice a j - •- � � !� E�EIIEMiNSFRY'ATIDN � iA't ` '•'"'�.. , 7- 41t •`, .P.,i �;"'.', �"� •..,moi Of n. �►{' r ; ..acv J..w\ ` u `� E _ . ! 'S - A•. �.! N� JI YS .. � dim ' ry Y NAPLES GRANDE HQLDINGS, LLC XATM VEKTATUM E -3 .m aumwT iA.raa�seR � GREY OAKS 0 i R a+ N IC C> N I- CD 0 I` T- 0 N J a rn M C 0 a U Q Q a LL V a c v r a Packet Pg. 1270 9.C.7 w -i LBOEKD BOUNDARY t './ •"7� ':1 4 t 1.'. NATIVE VBGBTA17ON . NAIIVP. VEGRTAT:ON 1RLK 40M AC 'i'AL AG `» ,+' yy'�. �ta'�� 1 •�. 4�l W[rHWODNSERVATION W l"--'�. ✓ n�1 low PIMA 1a0 KmlA.,t - WATTVF VEOETAITON swh 6 R!•11 MT[ Oa K 1Ltf K A/1 AD, , ` �• ��1�,1� REMOVED DUFJNO -_ . OOIDEWLAT pCQyy ` : iBITAL LT/. AVROVBMBN79 ,.- .' lt.s.®...,�.,.®.�a..o....�.o,. o,�.,.. , - jK 4 � y � •.i: 4;: + At 46 l a .4 " � � •f— � r r ` Y •� l`.iit.. NOW lo.— lF��y4M ..e;•: !�"d+•;.I". $S°s'�v$y�r; a a �3 - { s . POW w r, r:r � 1 �' J • • . '. ♦ \ `= � a .w. •i��a�ar- : ,x ;` ; wa` �#ytrri. Na' � - -K� i'al 1 ; r ! !• � �. I • � t � I ' mm NAPUS GRIWDE HOLDINGS, LLC NAnvE vE¢YATdi - >Wfl(ASi ouAcowD µD E-4 �• "'�' ••••. •-•••r•••••iP.•'••�0�• pp�,r mmm AREA OF MMIW r WASRAW ...sm...�..,.......,..�•��»�.,.��.��_ GREY OAKS"' - O i R .N x c> N I- CD O r O N J a rn M CD c 0 a U .Q Q a LL C E V a r d t v R a Packet Pg. 1271 17 E5x DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 2000-04 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-190 A RESOLUTION AMENDING DEVELOPMENT ORDER 90-3, AS AMENDED FOR THE GREY OAKS DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, AMENDING THE FINDINGS OF FACT SECTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVISING ACREAGE AND DENSITY OF LAND USES AND TO REPLACE THE GREY OAKS MASTER PLAN ILLUSTRATING A REVISED LAYOUT OF THE LAND USES FOR THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE PROJECT SITUATED ON AIRPORT ROAD AND GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND REVISIONS TO INTERNAL ROAD ACCESS POINTS AND GRADE SEPARATION; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; AND SECTION FOUR, EFFECT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DEVELOPMENT ORDER, TRANSMITTAL TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, approved Development Order 90-3 (the Development Order) on June 6, 1990, which approved a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) known as the Grey Oaks Development Order; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the approval of Development Order No. 90-3, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, approved several amendments to said Development Order; and WHEREAS, "Grey Oaks" through its authorized agent, has filled its application and notice of proposed change to Development Order No. 90-3, as amended, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners as the governing body of the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, with jurisdiction pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider proposed changes to the Grey Oaks DRI Development Order No. 90-3, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners passed Ordinance No, hoc» -06, on�Z zew which had the effect of amending the PUD zoning district for the Grey Oaks development previously approved in Ordinance No. 98-94; and WHEREAS, on , ,LerV the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, in accordance with Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, having considered the Grey Oaks application and Notice of Proposed Change to the Grey Oaks DRI Development Order No. 90-3, as amended, and record made at said hearing, and having considered the record of Words stfaekthFeagh are deleted; words underlined are added. -1- 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1274 17E the documentary and oral evidence presented to the Collier County Planning Commission, the report and recommendation of Collier County Planning Staff and Advisory Boards, the report and recommendations of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, the Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the following Grey Oaks DRI Development Order amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER AND MASTER PLAN: A. Paragraph 4 of the Findings of Fact Section of Development Order 90-3, as amended, for the Grey Oaks DRI is hereby amended to read as follows: 4: The applicant proposes the development of Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development for 1,601 acres which includes: 129.4 104.8 acres of commercial uses to include 250 hotel rooms, 653,453 square feet (gross floor area) of office commercial, 649,638 square feet (gross leasable area) of retail commercial, 4,9W 1,600 residential dwelling units, 72 holes of golf, and 32 38 367.88 acres of conservation, lakes and water management, which includes preservation acres. B. Paragraph 5 of the Conclusions of Law Section of Development Order 90-3, as amended, for the Grey Oaks DRI is hereby amended to read as follows: 5.a. The applicant or his successors shall be fully responsible for site -related roadway and intersection improvements required within the DRI. The applicant shall be required to pay the full cost for any site -related intersection improvements (including but not limited to, signalization, turn -lanes and additional through lanes) found to be necessary by Collier County for the project's access intersections onto Airport Road (C.R. 31), Golden Gate Parkway (C.R. 886) and the future Livingston Road. Attached hereto as Exhibit "E" is a list of access intersections approved for the project and changes that are or may be necessary in order to meet the long-range transportation plans for the area. A copy of the signal progression analysis requested by the County Transportation Department is incorporated by reference and copies have been submitted to the SWFRPC, Collier County, and the City of Naples. read ,ay. C. Exhibit `B" (Map H, Master Plan) of Development Order 90-3, as amended for the Grey Oaks DRI is hereby amended by replacing said Map H, with Exhibit "C" hereto, a new Master Plan depicted as Map H-1 attached and incorporated herein by reference, reflecting the amendments herein described. SECTION TWO: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposed changes to the previously approved DRI do not meet or exceed any of the criteria listed in the DRI Development Order or in Subsection 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. Words stmek dweugh are deleted; words underlined are added. -2- 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1275 17E "l 2. The applicant submitted to the County, the Regional Planning Council and the State Land Planning Agency Form BRM -08-86, said form being entitled "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact" (DRI) Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. 3. The application is in accordance with Section 380.06(19). 4. The proposed changes to the previously approved Development Order are consistent with the report and recommendation of the SWFRPC. 5. A comprehensive review of the impact generated by the proposed changes to the previously approved development has been conducted by the County's departments and the SWFRPC, and has established that the changes result in a reduction of the project's impacts. 6. The development is not in an area designated an Area of Critical State Concern pursuant to the provisions of Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, as amended. 7. No increase in development intensity is authorized by this Development Order No. -I-- SECTION THREE: CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The proposed changes to the previously approved Development Order do not constitute a substantial deviation requiring further Development of Regional Impact review. 2. The proposed changes to the previously approved development will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the area. 3. The proposed changes to the previously approved development are consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Land Development Regulations adopted pursuant thereto. 4. The proposed changes to the previously approved Development Order are consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan, SECTION FOUR: EFFECT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DEVELOPMENT ORDER TRANSMITTAL TO DCA AND EFFECTIVE DATE 1. Except as amended hereby, Development Order 90-03, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, binding in accordance with its terms on all parties thereto. 2. Copies of this Development Order o?000 shall be transmitted immediately upon execution to the Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Land and Water Management, and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council. 3. This Development Order shall take effect as provided by law. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. Words sk-ask tkaugh are deleted; words underlined are added. -3- 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1276 17E i This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this c;MC�6 day of QJ 2000. BOARD OFC MMISSIONERS COLLIE OUNTY, FLORIDA Attest as to Chairman's � 4 d�•.i".4. slgnatu t only. TIMVY J. CO ANTINE, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency Marjorid M. Student Assistant County Attorney g/admin/DOA-90-03/RN/im Words stfusk- etrgk are deleted; words underlined are added. -4- 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1277 17 E FORM RPM-BSP-PROPCHANGE-1 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF COMMUNITY PLANNING BUREAU OF LOCAL PLANNING 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 850-487-4545 NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL UAFACT (DRI) SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning agency, and the state land planning agency according to this form. 1. I, George Varnadoe, the undersigned authorized representative of Halstatt Partnership and Naples Golf Course Holdings, Ltd., hereby gives notice of a proposed change to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. In support thereof, I submit the following information concerning the Halstatt DRI/Grey Oaks PUD development, which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have submitted today, under separate cover, copies of this completed notification to the following: Collier County, City of Naples, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, and Bureau of Local Planning, Department of Community Affairs. (Date) Signature) Page 1 of 12 EXHIBIT "A" 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1278 l7E Applicants: Halstatt Partnership 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, Florida 34105 (941) 262-2600 Naples Golf Course Holdings, Ltd. 4200 Gulfshore Blvd. N. Naples, FL 34103 Authorized Agent: George L. Varnadoe, Esquire Young, van Assenderp, Varnadoe & Anderson, P.A. 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34108 (941) 597-2814 4. Location (City, County, Township/Range/Section) of approved DRI and proposed change. Sections 24, 25 and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build -out date, development order conditions and requirements, or to the representations contained in either the development order of the Application for Development Approval. Indicate such changes on the project master site plan, supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts. The Grey Oaks DRI (formerly known as Halstatt DRq consists of 1,601 acres located within the northeast, southeast and northwest quadrants formed by the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road. The intersection forms the center of a designed "Activity Center" in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. The northwest quadrant of the Grey Oaks DRI, consisting of 354 acres, is within the jurisdiction of the City of Naples. The northeast and southeast quadrants of Grey Oaks, consisting of 1,247 acres, are located in unincorporated Collier County. The initial Grey Oaks DRI Development Order (DO 90-3) was issued by Collier County Resolution 90-292 on June 6, 1990. The City of Naples approved the portion of Grey Oaks within its jurisdiction on October 17,1990, in Resolution 90-6211. Subsequent amendments to the County and City DRI Development Orders for Grey Oaks are described in response to question 7 below. A copy of Page 2 of 12 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1279 9.C.7 17E ' I the currently approved Master Plan for the Grey Oaks DRI is included as Exhibit A to this NOPC. The changes proposed in this NOPC for the Grey Oaks DRI/PUD are depicted on Exhibit B. The changes will not result in increases to any of the approved land uses currently authorized within the project. The proposed changes will shift some of the approved commercial (office and retail) use from the northwest quadrant to the northeast quadrant. This redistribution of commercial use will result in a reduction in the acreage devoted to office and retail use in the northwest quadrant, accompanied by an increase in the amount of golf/open space acreage in that quadrant. However, no increase is requested beyond the approved total of 18 golf holes in the northwest quadrant. The only proposed change to the amounts of approved uses within Grey Oaks is a reduction of the number of residential units from 1900 to 1600, a decrease of 300 units. The proposed shifting of land uses from one area to another dictates minor relocations of the access points to Grey Oaks from both Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway, and elimination of the internal project overpass crossing Airport Road. The changes to the Grey Oaks Master Plan are depicted in the proposed Master Plan attached as Exhibit B. The following is a narrative description of changes proposed in this NOPC, within the City (northwest quadrant) and County (northeast quadrant) jurisdictions. Changes To The Northwest Quadrant (a) A reduction in the number of residential units from 764 units to 464 units, a decrease of 300 units. The developer shall have the ability to shift up to 200 of the approved multi -family units from the northwest quadrant to the northeast quadrant. The acreage of residential use is being reduced by 14 acres, to a total of 108 acres. (b) A reduction in the amount of retail commercial use from 219,000 gross square feet (GLA) of floor area to 40,000, a decrease of 179,000 square feet (GLA), which will be shifted to the northeast quadrant. (c) A reduction in the amount of office use from 128,000 square feet (GFA) to 60,000 square feet, a decrease of 68,000 square feet, which will be shifted to the northeast quadrant. (d) A reduction in the amount of designated commercial (retail and office use) acreage from 30 acres to 14.4 acres, a decrease of 15.6 acres. (e) A reduction in the golf course acreage from 115.4 acres to 100.5 acres, a decrease of 14.9acres, with no change to the18 approved golf holes. Page 3 of 12 Packet Pg. 1280 17E (f) An increase in the acreage designated for lakes, water management and preservation from 86.6 acres to 131.1acres, an increase of 44.5 acres. (g) A change of the location of the access points to Grey Oaks from Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, as depicted on the revised Master Plan, Exhibit "B". (h) The deletion of the internal project overpass across Airport Road between the northwest and northeast quadrants. The Changes To The Northeast Quadrant (a) An increase in the amount of office space by 68,000 square feet (shifted from the northwest quadrant). (b) An increase in the amount of retail use by 179,000 square feet (shifted from the northwest quadrant). (c) Deletion of the internal project overpass between the northwest and northeast quadrants. (d) Relocation of project access points from Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway, as depicted on the revised Master Plan, Exhibit "B". (e) The developer shall have the flexibility of relocating up to 200 multi- family residential units from the northwest quadrant to the northeast quadrant, so long as the total number of residential units in Grey Oaks does not exceed 1600 units. It should be emphasized that there is no increase in commercial or office uses in the Grey Oaks DRI, simply an internal relocation of the approved uses. The only change to the approved land uses within the project is the deletion of 300 residential units. A transportation analysis report prepared by David Plummer & Associates is attached to the NOPC as Exhibit C. The report establishes that the traffic impacts of Grey Oaks DRI, with the proposed changes, as depicted on Exhibit B, will be reduced in comparison to the impacts of the current DRI, as depicted on Exhibit A. The two charts below marked Tables 1 and 2, show the proposed land uses within the City of Naples and Collier County quadrants, respectively, of the Grey Oaks DRI, in comparison to uses approved in both the original 1990 Development Orders issued by those jurisdictions and the changes they approved in the 1998 NOPC. Table 3 shows land use changes for the entire Grey Oaks DRI since 1990, including this NOPC. Page 4 of 12 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1281 TABLE I COMPARISON OF APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TO THE PROPOSED LAND USES FOR PORTIONS OF GREY OAKS DRI LOCATED IN THE CITY OF NAPLES (WEST OF AIRPORT ROAD) *The developer may relocate up to 200 multi -family units from the northwest quadrant to the northeast quadrant so long as the total number of residential units in Grey Oaks does not exceed 1600 units. Page 5 of 12 9.C.7 f11 Packet Pg. 1282 ORIGINAL 1990 1998 NOPC INCREASE OR 2000 NOPC INCREASE OR CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT DECREASE DECREASE INCREASE OR ORDER DECREASE SINCE 1990 ACRES 354 354 0 354 0 0 RESIDENTIAL UNITS 764 D.U.s 764 D.U.s 0 464 D.U.s * -300 D.U.s -300 D.U.s and ACREAGE 122 Acres 122 Acres 0 Acres 108 Acres - 14 Acres - 14 Acres COMMERCIAL 30 30 0 14.4 Acres -15.6 Acres -15.6 Acres ACREAGE OFFICE 128,000 S.F. 128,000 S.F. 0 60,000 S.F. -68,000 S.F. -68,000 S.F. (Gross Floor Area) (GFA) (GFA) (GFA) (GFA) (GFA) RETAIL 219,000 S.F. 219,000 S.F. 0 40,000 S.F. -179,000 S.F. -179,000 S.F. (Gross Leasable Area) (GLA) (GLA) (GLA) (GLA) (GLA) HOTEL ROOMS 0 0 0 0 0 0 GOLF HOLES and 9 18 +9 Holes 18 0 +9 Holes GOLF COURSE 115.4± Acres 115.4 Acres 0 Acres 100.5 Acres -14.9 Acres -14.9 Acres ACREAGE LAKES, WATER 86.6± Acres 86.6 Acres 0 Acres 131.1 Acres +44.5 Acres +44.5 Acres MANAGEMENT and PRESERVATION *The developer may relocate up to 200 multi -family units from the northwest quadrant to the northeast quadrant so long as the total number of residential units in Grey Oaks does not exceed 1600 units. Page 5 of 12 9.C.7 f11 Packet Pg. 1282 TABLE 2 COMPARISON OF APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TO THE PROPOSED LAND (USES FOR PORTIONS OF GREY OAKS DRI LOCATED IN COLLIER COUNTY (EAST OF AIRPORT ROAD) *The developer may relocate up to 200 multi -family units from the northwest quadrant to the northeast quadrant so long as the total number of residential units in Grey Oaks does not exceed 1600 units. Page 6 of 12 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1283 ORIGINAL 1990 1998 NOPC INCREASE OR 2000 NOPC INCREASE OR CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT DECREASE DECREASE INCREASE OR ORDER DECREASE SINCE 1990 ACRES 1247 1247 0 1247 0 No Change RESIDENTIAL UNITS 1936 D.U.s 1136 D.U.s -800 D.U.s 1136 D.U.s * 0 -800 D.U.s and ACREAGE 399.8 Acres 310.9 Acres -88.9 .Acres 310.9 Acres 0 -88.9 Acres COMMERCIAL 90.4 90.4 0 Acres 90.4 Acres 0 No Change ACREAGE OFFICE 525,453 S.F. 525,453 S.F. 0 593,453 S.F. +68,000 S.F. +68,000 S.F. (Gross Floor Area) (GFA) (GFA) (GFA) (Shifted from West) RETAIL 430,638 S.F. 430,638 S.F. 0 609,638 S.F. +179,000 S.F. +179,000 S.F. (Gross Leasable Area) (GLA) (GLA) (GLA) (Shifted From West) HOTEL ROOMS 250 250 0 250 0 No Change GOLF HOLES and 45 54 +9 Holes 54 Holes 0 +9 Holes GOLF COURSE 577.1± Acres 609.32 Acres +32.22 Acres 609.32 Acres 0 +32.22 Acres ACREAGE LAKES, WATER 180.1± Acres 236.78 Acres +56.68 Acres 236.78 Acres 0 +56.68 Acres MANAGEMENT and PRESERVATION *The developer may relocate up to 200 multi -family units from the northwest quadrant to the northeast quadrant so long as the total number of residential units in Grey Oaks does not exceed 1600 units. Page 6 of 12 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1283 9.C.7 TABLE 3 COMPARISON OF PROPOSED LAND USES TO APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ORDERS FOR I3REY OAKS DRI *The developer may relocate up to 200 multi -family units from the northwest quadrant to the northeast quadrant so long as the total number of residential units in Grey Oaks does not exceed 1600 units. Page 7 of 12� Packet Pg. 1284 ORIGINAL 1990 1998 NOPC INCREASE OR 2000 NOPC INCREASE OR CUMULATIVE DECREASE DECREASE INCREASE OR DECREASE ACRES 1601 1601 0 1601 0 No Change RESIDENTIAL 2700 D.U.s 1900 D.U,s -800 D.U.s 1600 D.U.s • -300 D.U.s -1100 D.U.s UNITS and 521.8 Acres 432.9 Acres -88.9 Acres 418.9 Acres -14 Acres -102.9 Acres ACREAGE RESIDENTIAL 1.68U/Ac 1.18 U/Ac -0.5 LJ/Ac 0.99 U/Ac -0.19 U/Ac -0.69 U/Ac DENSITY (GROSS) COMMERCIAL 120.4 120.4 No Change 104.8 Acres -15.6 Acres -15.6 Acres ACREAGE OFFICE 653,453 Sq. Ft. 653,453 Sq. Ft. No Change 653,453 Sq. Ft. No Change No Change (Gross Floor Area) (GFA) (GFA) RETAIL 649,638 Sq. Ft. 649,638 Sq. Ft. No Change 649,638 Sq. Ft. No Change No Change (Gross Leasable Area) (GLA) (GLA) (GLA) HOTEL ROOMS 250 250 No Change 250 No Change No Change GOLF HOLES and 54 72 +18 72 No Change +18 Holes GOLF COURSE 692.5 Acres 724.72 Acres +32.2:2 Acres 709.82 Acres -14.9 Acres +17.32 Acres ACREAGE LAKES, WATER 266.7 Acres 323.38 Acres +56.7 Acres 367.88 Acres +44.5 Acres +101.18 Acres MANAGEMENT and PRESERVATION *The developer may relocate up to 200 multi -family units from the northwest quadrant to the northeast quadrant so long as the total number of residential units in Grey Oaks does not exceed 1600 units. Page 7 of 12� Packet Pg. 1284 17E (6) Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, indicate no change. See Substantial Deviation Determination Chart, below. (7) List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate identification numbers) of all modifications or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the previous changes (i.e., any information not already addressed in the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart). Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? A. Pursuant to an agreement reached between Collier County and the Department of Community Affairs, Collier County issued an amended Development Order (D.O. 90-5) in Resolution No. 90-498 on October 16, 1990. B. To correct a scrivener's error in Development Order 90-5, Collier County adopted Resolution 90-571 in order to add the words "apply for or" to the third sentence of Section 5, Subsection d. (4) of Development Order 90-5. This action was taken on November 27,1990. C. In response to Halstatt's NOPC, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County on November 24, 1998, issued Development Order 98-2 (Resolution 98472) amending the Grey Oaks Development Order and Master Plan to reduce the number of residential units to 1,900; to increase the number of golf holes to 72; shift the site of the hotel use to the southeast quadrant; and increase the conservation, lakes and preservation areas from 180.1 acres to 236.78 acres. D. The City Council of the City of Naples adopted Resolution 98-8372 on October 7,1998 amending the Grey Oaks Master Plan and approving a total of 18 golf holes located within the northwest quadrant of Grey Oaks DRI. (8) Describe any lands purchased or optioned within `/< mile of the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DRI development order. Identify such land, its size, intended use, and adjacent non-profit land uses within V2 mile on a project master site plan or other map. None. Page 8 of 12 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1285 (9) Indicate if the proposed change is less than 40% (cumulatively with other previous changes) of any of the criteria listed in Paragraph 390.06 (19), Florida Statutes. Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph 380.06 (19) (e) 2., Florida Statutes. YES NO XX (10) Does the proposed change result in a change to the buildout date or any phasing date of the project? If so, indicate the proposed new buildout or phasing dates. The phasing and build -out dates are not being changed. (11) Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan? No. (12) An updated master plan or other map of the development portraying and distinguishing the proposed changes to the previously approved DRI or development order conditions. See attached revised Master Plan attached as Exhibit B. (13) Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19) (f), Florida Statutes, include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. This language should address and quantify: See attached Exhibits D and E, revised Grey Oaks DRI Development Orders with new language indicated by underlining and deleted language by strike- throughs. a. All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build -out date of the development; to development order conditions and requirements; to commitments and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change. There are no proposed changes to the phasing or build -out dates of the Grey Oaks DRUPUD, nor to any development order conditions in requirements, nor to any of the commitments and representations in the ADA. For changes to the acreage of each described land use, including open space and areas for preservation and to the amount and location of residential units and other major characteristics or components of the Page 9 of 12 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1286 Grey Oaks DRI, please refer to (1) the Land Use Chart contained in response to question 5 above; (2) the revised Grey Oaks Master Plan attached as Exhibit B, and (3) the amended County and City Development Orders attached as Exhibit D and E, respectively. b. An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage is/has been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development; See page iv, Exhibit "A" attached to Consent, above. There is no change to the legal description of the Grey Oaks DRI. C. A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical development of the proposed changes, if applicable; Development of the northeast and southeast quadrants of the Grey Oaks DRI have already commenced. Therefore, there is no proposed change to commencement of physical development date. d. A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development; No change is proposed for the termination date of the Development Order. e. A proposed amended development order date until which the local government agrees that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down - zoning; unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, if applicable; and No change. Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report, including the date of submission, contents, and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in Subsection 9J-2.025 (7), F.A.C. No change. Page 10 of 12 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1287 17 E SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION DETERMINATION CHART Portions of the DCA Standard Form NOPC Substantial Deviation Chart are not relevant or applicable because the following uses listed on the Chart are not included within the Grey Oaks DRI: Attractions, Airports, Hospitals, Industrial, Mining, Petroleum Storage, Ports and R.V. Parks. The non -applicable sections of the standard chart form are omitted. The chart below addresses all approved and proposed land uses within the Grey Oaks DRI. TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN 1998 NOPC Mice Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. 104.8 AC. "Commercial" 120.4 AC. "Commercial" 120.4 AC. "Commercial" Building (gross sq.ft.) 653,453 (GFA) 653,453 (GFA) 653,453 (GFA) # Parking spaces # Employees Site locational changes See EXH. "B" See EXH. "A" # External vehicle trips See EXH. "C" D. O. conditions No Change ADA representations No Change esidential # Dwelling units Type of dwelling units 1,600 D.U. 2,700 D.U. 1,900 D.U. # Lou Acreage, inc. drainage, ROW, easements, etc. 418.9 AC. 521.8 AC. 432.9 AC. Site locational changes See EXH. "B" See EXH. "A" # External vehicle trips See EXH."C" D.O. conditions No Change /holesale, Retail, xvice Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. 104.8 AC. "Commercial' 120.4 AC. "Commercial" 120.4 AC. "Commercial" Floor space (gross sq.ft.) 649,638 S.F. (GLA) 649,638 S.F. (GLA) 649,638 S.F. (GLA) # Parking spaces # Employees Site locational changes See EXH. "B" See EXH. "A" # External vehicle trips See EXH. "C' D. O. conditions See EXH. "D" ADA Representations No Change Page 11 of 12 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1288 17E TYPE OF LAND USE CHANGE CATEGORY PROPOSED PLAN ORIGINAL PLAN 1998 NOPC lotel/Motel # Rental Units 250 RM. 250 RM. 250 RM. Floor space (gross sq.ft.) # Parking places # Employees Site locational changes NO CHANGE See EXH. "A" Acreage, including drainage, ROW, easements, etc. # External vehicle trips See EXH. "C" D.O. conditions See EXH. "D" ADA representations No Change )pen Space (all atural and vegetated) Acreage Golf, Recreation Park, ROW 793.0 AC. 72 Holes 692.5 AC. 54 Holes 724.72 AC. 72 Holes Site locational changes See EXH. "B" See EXH. "A" Type of open space ADA representations reservation, Buffer r Special Protection .reqs Acreage for lakes, water management and preservation 367.88 AC. 266.7 AC. 323.38 AC. Site locational changes See EXH. "B" See EXH. "A" Development of site proposed D. O. conditions No Change ADA representations No Change sers\Valarie\wpb\grey oaks\miscWOPC ENTIRE FINAL.wpd Page 12 of 12 9.C.7 i n w a Packet Pg. 1289 17E LEGEND �rLL w wnMo.�..norM.nr rww oc orrcr�mweou o awn �Ki rmt r ww�sro. rMam `� IUll Orpl111.YllAirpA♦.IIrM TI.rwIr 1A�O MIO w01UlIIAlOL {- wexrw we wwrtour aearnrrwmwrcnow e �srnLL kcr par fa �Mnr areo� LAND USE SUMMARY wnwurwe w�unwrarw�wn wrrrnn. Mam �mnvy �a.um nu orrc�roo�ar_ �rA rw� r n.w wu mw•rawAmr�wwrrroraAv wrow rrra w�n�roraMwiw��wrMu,�rt �� ■!►tRN. IwlA w]IRIIwO! OlMiwfr 'w�w^r+ ru wn Baa mrwroM,awin wrArr ti oov mwirarr�inv.wwwrtwar�r reran ��u ��n• rMurwr rte_ wiamr.� raA If 9.C.7 z a J. CL z 2 a 0 J W Lu a W U) ca G Q FW 0 � W W;--! 0a MMMMM� Rf a MISSIMER AND ASSOCIATES, INC FAPLUMMER W. ROSS MC MLLuukq Vi"ON, MILLER, BARTON HALSTA" PARTNC. BOLL i PEEK, INC. L- ; EXRIBIT "A" U) 0 d ,L^ V +BA N N ti r O O O O N J d CD M 14 �O C O cc V Q C. Q U_ C N s Q O t V O Q Packet Pg. 1290 §.C.7 \ |� 2§27 t&22 wils(mm% l r FUD MASTER PAN - MAP H1 eemm FOR: memLSTATT PARTNERSHIP EXHIBIT "v' \ 0 � � B � � � k � C4 _j a k 14 � � : _v 0.Q � � E 2 � « k E 2 \ Packet Pg. 1291 17E! § \ ` -.- s■S!!■-» q |q ��■`$||§!|| �;;�|■!, !: |�.,§�\ ° r R �§ \ @ | @ ! \ § | ) !2|K , „_; e§:�e:�■£' § e q f§§/§\§4� •= 8 : §;■ # 1� •\ | & k | § _ !- g z4 2'% \ |� 2§27 t&22 wils(mm% l r FUD MASTER PAN - MAP H1 eemm FOR: memLSTATT PARTNERSHIP EXHIBIT "v' \ 0 � � B � � � k � C4 _j a k 14 � � : _v 0.Q � � E 2 � « k E 2 \ Packet Pg. 1291 E LEGEND r_nw ec aei, m.r� w w wrtwrrsnanr arra e oe�or� x awvro�a. o aw�w ow ccr�o�trw.r. www rnnm Fri rua �w.rrrrs.er wnw naurr rwr�nns rrunAira. F �rrno rww an asww ��a 8 ranw.ewr�wa� �} rplRn Ylfq� . wnw wsnais arras aranan ar wu r rwro waw r• rwrrtw rwe�. LAND USE SUMMARY ac�a rrrwan. uulwrr..ir aeuwwrrrswnrr rr�rww� �..r urn awseorra� �r� run r nu n.r moo pr O�IrIOIaY�rlilr rrrn u+wa Owl 'Ali slur rwarrr �� rr urn .ru er�u�a wawa• rs oai pq�warnor,Narwowa n�ss eau�rwocaaw.na ww�r•r nu � fOIK Or�11Iw�0�W11^t•��a R� nrK wwwaOaowr �Mola IaLOUaaw.lRr rtw Y1 rraraM aI�11®lnaw0.r �1r+wCT A C1MIIr YOYMaIrI CLWTOK EMI A CUFTON Il If TEAM PLAN, INC WSSIMER AND ASSOC111TES, INC DAVID RUMMER W. ROSS Mc1UR.LIAMS YYEAON. MRLER BARTON HALSTATT PARTNERSHIP L ASSOC. SOLL l PEEK INC. tXHIBIT "B" 9.C.7 z a J - a F - z 2 CL O J w W 0 W` `F,A- v+ a 00 W o OC =; on: 0 d B N 2 G6 N r- 04 N J a o� M �O C O cC V Q M Q U_ C as s Q t V Q Packet Pg. 1292 61GOD MO M[ASL AM SONTREASL GUADNANTS ICOLY[R COUNTY) •RCSIDENTIAL OfWR/A[TAIL oRIMRNCIAL IORL GOV cOURS[/AC[R[ATION/PARA/RI61R-Oi-RAr [OYS[NVATMM/U[6/RATER WN•CFJICNT 9UI 0 AL DORTRFEST OUADRADI IGlii or NAPDES) •R[SIUENTNL OIIII'C/R[TAN COYYERCYL GOV COU0.SC/RCCWTION PYRN�ACGM!'UEY•Y wnoT.in°N/uA[/RA •N U Y[Ni OIIIf!/NElAIL alYiYnIAL IAL i IMUL (All a......R) I' IRCI j,Fct'NU ULNEBAI,-N-,U C� / RCSIU[NTI•L II R Aw PRESIRYATION A— ARE 6_Aj _ D.n(••A M Gm Cou.s VPROAI'YATE AND Isu I[ RUINED INI GRV COUpt Y•INTLn•NCC 1.-1 TNC IENYRTING IROC[SI. 'I ALL ACALAGT.S ARE APMOAIY•TA ANO 11 Q u"OV C CWASt CLUBNOVII VAFI IIICT [ AMD/OR ATI- S IC TO CNANG tYa I I ®' /h CYERCRNCY Now./.. ]TAnoN , TMt DEVCWPER YAY RELOCATE DIRC[/R[TAIL MIANENCI•L - VI TO ::W -LEI-MMM VP- COYNERCIAL/HOTEL C NNFRCIAL/L PROP TIL[ MONTMR[ST DUAORANT TD tN[ f0 CAW& O NRTNIRV WADAANT IDnG A, TAR MA t NUMB OI L IAA[ Rg1TIL uNR4 IN cm Ol[C Q %VIEILAND (CONSERVATION AREASI 1800 DOES NOT I.Y[tED UMTI P PAR[ IIRN iUPN IANI[ HA1N AMR •UTATION All IIEN Rim MI AIN RIGH[ EUT I� awn IM AM Am" OUT AND IOIITM ROUND LER 61GOD MO M[ASL AM SONTREASL GUADNANTS ICOLY[R COUNTY) •RCSIDENTIAL OfWR/A[TAIL oRIMRNCIAL IORL GOV cOURS[/AC[R[ATION/PARA/RI61R-Oi-RAr [OYS[NVATMM/U[6/RATER WN•CFJICNT 9UI 0 AL DORTRFEST OUADRADI IGlii or NAPDES) •R[SIUENTNL OIIII'C/R[TAN COYYERCYL GOV COU0.SC/RCCWTION PYRN�ACGM!'UEY•Y wnoT.in°N/uA[/RA •N U Y[Ni OIIIf!/NElAIL alYiYnIAL IAL i IMUL (All a......R) I' IRCI 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1293 6_Aj _ D.n(••A " OW OW'� D+ M IIUAI WRTM ICALf P.I00 tYa I I 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1293 Legend: xxx Added Language xxx Deleted Language REVISED EXHIBIT E ffikESTAT-T 194H/GREY OAKS PUD/DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER ACCESS CONDITIONS 17E 5/03/90 5/23/90 6/11/90 Revised 5/25/00 The Grey Oaks DRI shall construct at no cost to Collier County all site -related improvements providing direct access to the Project as deemed necessary by the Collier County Transportation Division including all project access points on Airport Road, Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road and all site -related improvements required within the DRI. The developer's obligation for these improvements shall include the full costs of design and engineering, utility relocation, right-of-way acquisition and dedication (if any), construction of turn lanes, acceleration and deceleration lanes, construction inspection, contract administration, testing and signalization (as needed and warranted). The alignment, design, signalization and construction schedule for these improvements shall be approved by the Collier County Transportation Division. 2. Access to Golden Gate Parkway, Airport Road and Livingston Road shall be limited to those access points and lane configurations as schematically depicted in the drawing titled Project Access Locations, Golden Gate Parkway Conceptual Roadway Master Plan, Lane Arrangements For Site Access with Interchanges, Sheet 1 of and dated 4/11/89 and revised 5/23/90, and 6/11/90, and 5/25/00 and included as Revised Exhibit 1. and more fully described in Revised Exhibit 2 titled Grey Oaks DRI Project Access Conditions. The modified Project access is presented in Revised Exhibit 1 and Revised Exhibit 2. Changes from the original approved access are summarized below. Revised Access Plan Driveway Original Plan Revised Plan 1 Full Access 2 Full Access, (Later Right In/Out) 3 Full Access (T Intersection) 1of10 No Chane No Chanee Full Access (Four Way -3A & 3B, Shifted East) 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1294 4. REVISED EXHIBIT E (continued) 3C Not Included 4 Full Access (T Intersection) 5 Full Access (T Intersection) 6 Full Access 7 Full Access 8A & 8B Full Access 8C Right In/Out 8D Not Included 9 Full Access 10 Right In/Out 11 Right In/Out 12 Full Access 13 Right In/Out 17E Right-In/Out Full Access (T Intersection. Shifted East) Full Access (T Intersection, Shifted East) No Change No Change Full Access (Shifted North No Change Directional Access Eliminated Eliminated Eliminated No Change Eliminated It is recognized that ultimate access control is available to local government through exercise of its police powers based on health, safety and welfare considerations. In addition to such ultimate access control, and the access controls identified in Revised Exhibit 2, additional controls could include signal system directional phasing (decreasing side street green) and additional tum lanes. Sfedian closures mid test,ictcd tUin iancs, if needed, to Ptoject Entimices #4 and #5 on 6olden Gate Parkway. fil tile event that ttrIn remhictiall „ Traffic signals at the Project access points, as warranted, shall be interconnected and coordinated with the adjacent signalized intersections along Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway. In an effort to ensure the maximum signal progression possible along Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, certain green bands for progression purposes have been identified and evaluated by the Collier County Transportation Division. The signal progression bands identified by Collier County reflect Collier County's operational decision to provide preferential treatment to thru movements. This condition means that east/west Golden Gate Parkway thru movements and north/south Airport Road thru movements will be given preference over the Project's intersecting side street movements. W.. WIN &V4111 .w • M. ••• •.•• • •... • �1.gnnn�•�AR•�%w�.Ltti�L' t 2of10 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1295 REVISED EXHIBIT E (continued) 17 E 4.5: Permanent access to Project maintenance buildings shall be reviewed and approved by the Collier County Transportation Division. Access to the maintenance building in the North Quad shall be via Livingston Road. Full or partial access onto Livingston Road shall be dependent on the driveway location, level of service operations on Livingston Road and cross section of Livingston Road. Provided that proper turn lanes are installed and level of service standards are maintained on Livingston Road, fu11 access shall be provided under a two, four and six lane cross section. It is recognized that ultimate access control is available to local government through exercise of its police powers based on health, safety and welfare considerations. In addition to such ultimate access control, additional controls could include signal system directional phasing, additional turn lanes and median closures and restricted turn lanes. 3of10 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1296 17E REVISED EXHIBIT E (continued) Construction access shall be reviewed on a case by case basis by the Collier County Transportation Division. 4of10 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1297 EXRTNC POINCWM ORIVEWAY /7 VILLAGE ENTRANCE E RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY REVISED EXHIBIT 1 L.1_1 PROJECT ACCESS LOCATIONS .IBRNC POINCMJM VILLAGE ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY /1 RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY EXISTING BEARS PAW ENTRANCE EIOSTING _ 1" COACH HOUSE LANE p IIO 0_ Jll ~ Of EXISTING ELEMENTARY O a SCHOOL ENTRANCE 'SAI Q DRIVEWAY /68 OFFICE/COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY JW DRIVEWAY /2 OFFICE/COMMERCIAL EXISTING POINCIANA OFFICE ENTRANCE eaI GREY OAKS DRI DRIVEWAY /6A COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY 06D COMMERCIAL ENTRANCES DRIVEWAY PJC DRIVEWAY j7A DRIVEWAY #4 DRNEWAY 06 RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY �� GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY��_ DRIVEWAY j]B DRIVEWAY #5 LEGEND • �Q► SIGNAL DRIVEWAY f12 • RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE GOLDEN GATT= PARKWAY LANE ARRANGEMENTS "m"0s9/05N CONCEPTUAL_ ROADWAY FOR SITE ACCESS Revised 5/25/00 MASTER PLAN I WITH INTERCHANGE 1 of 2 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1298 W REVISED EXHIBIT 1 (CONTINUED) OFFICE/COMMERCIAL RIGHT IN/OUT ACCESS ONLY EXISTING POINCIANA OFFICE ENTRANCE RICHT IN/OUT ACCESS ONLY Golden Gate/Airport Road interchange geometric layout developed and prepared by Wilson Miller, Inc. Exhibit produced by Dovid Plummer do Associates, Inc. BI GREY OAKS DRI RIGHT IN/OUT ORNLVAY COMMFRCIAL ENTRANCES GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY CONCEPTUAL ROADWAY MASTER PLAN RIGHT IN/DUT ACCESS ONLY 0 N 500, FULL MOVEMENT ACCESS GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY LEFT TURN ACCESS TO THE NORTH COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED FROM THE AIRPORT ROAD CASTSOUND ON-RAMP TO GOLDEN CATE PARKWAY. LEGM A 4(> PROPOSED TRNTTC VV SIGNAL LOCATION 995B7/09A/0500 URBAN INTERCHANGE I Revised 5/25/00 DETAILS 12 of 2 , 9.C.7 U) Y fC 0 Q) 'L^ V B M T) 2 r rn N ti r O O O ti r O N J a. rn M CD O V Q CL Q LL d t V a r a Packet Pg. 1299 5/03,190 5/23/90 6/11/90 Revised 5/25/2000 REVISED EXHIBIT 2 tfhtST-A-TT/GREY OAKS DRI PROJECT ACCESS CONDITIONS 7 of 1' 0 9.C.7 V) R O aD C7 2 rn N ti 0 0 0 r 0 N J a rn M c 0 r ra U .Q Q a LL c a� E t v a c E t U R Q Packet Pg. 1300 Area Development DrivewArterial RoadwaySer✓ed(21 Phase - OpeninQ Access Conditions I Golden Gate Parkway West Quad- • Full access, four way intersection under four an - six Residential 2/3 lane divided roadway. Located to align with the Bear's Paw Service Entrance. Project left and right turn lanes. • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if warranted, subject to interconnect and signal progression criteria. (3) 2 Golden Gate Parkway West Quad - 2/3 • Prior to grade separation at Golden Gate Parkway/ Office/Commercial Airport Road: (4) 3 • Full access, four way intersection under fourand six lane divided roadway and aligned with existing Poinciana Office Park. Project left and right tum lames. • With grade separation at Golden Gate Parkway/Airport Road: (4) 3 • Right turn in and out only access. 3A/3B Golden Gate Parkway North Quad - t • Full access, 9:11 "four-way" intersection under four To".. ee"ter and six lane divided roadway. Project dual inbound South Quad 2/3 and outbound left turn lanes (subject to traffic 7 of 1' 0 9.C.7 V) R O aD C7 2 rn N ti 0 0 0 r 0 N J a rn M c 0 r ra U .Q Q a LL c a� E t v a c E t U R Q Packet Pg. 1300 3C' 4 5 6 9.C.7 monitoring) and separate right turn lanes S ignalization subject to Collier County Transportation Division approval and subject to interconnect and Y Packet Pg. 1301 signal progression f3j ' M O • With Golden Gate Parkway/Airport Road grade separation, left turn access from the Airport Road eastbound on-ramp to Golden Gate Parkway will be prohibited. (4) N 3 Golden Gate Parkway North Ouad - Town Center 213 _ Rieht-in/out only, 2 N ti Golden Gate Parkway North Quad - t • Full access, "T" intersection under four and six lane o Office 2/3 divided roadway. Project dual left turn lanes and 0 o separate and right turn lanes. c N • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if d warranted, subject to interconnect and signal progression. criteria (3j M Golden Gate Parkway South Quad - 2/3 Full access, "T" intersection under four and six lane ResidentiaUHotel lane divided roadway. Project left and right turn lanes. O • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if r M warranted, subject to interconnect and signal _U progression criteria F3j Q Q LL • With Golden Gate Parkway/Livingston Road grade separation, left turn access from the Livingston Road westbound on-ramp to Golden Gate Parkway will be t prohibited. (4) Livingston Road North Quad - t 3 Full access under two, four and six lane divided Q 2/3 roadway. Project left and right turn lanes. Located to align with Wyndemere Entrance. m • Signalization subject to signal warrant study. t r r Q 8of10 M Packet Pg. 1301 7 8A 813 8C 112 9 10 Airport Road North Quad- 1 Full access under fou".nd six lane divided roadway. Residential Aligned with existing north Poinciana Village Entrance. Project left and right turn lanes. Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if warranted, subject to interconnect and signal progression e, it,. e4 Airport Road North Quad - t Full access, under focmmd six lane divided roadway, Town Center 213 Aligned with future access to West Quad (Driveway 88). Project dual left tum lanes (subject to traffic monitoring) and right turn lane. Signalization subject to CollierCounty Transportation Division approval and subject to interconnect and signal progression crib, . rreeessm1. (3) Airport Road West Quad - 2/3 Full access anderfovraTrdsix lane divided roadway. Aligned with North Quad - Town Center Entrance (Driveway 8A). Project dual left turn lanes and right tum lane. Airport Road West Quad - 2/3 Right in and out only access under six lane divided Office/Commercial roadway. (4) 3 Airport Road North Ouad 2/3 Directional median opening: inbound left and riiLht turn lane, outbound rie:ht turn lane. Airport Road South Quad - 2 ; Driveway eliminated Residential/Office/ Commercialfetirdividedmadw.y. me Project left arid ight turn .s- • —if "ananted, to subject and signal tei in. =h Livingston Road South Quad - 3 1 Driveway Eliminated. Residential 9 of'10 9.C.7 U) O i C7 T) 2 rn N I- CD 0 r O N J a rn M c O U .Q tz a LL c a� E U a r a� U r a Packet Pg. 1302 M Em -i I Livingston Road South Quad - 3 �_ Driveway Eliminated. Residential Right in mid rittt-on-fracceas uncle. fou. and six ane divided- roadway. 12 Livingston Road South Quad - 3 Full access, "T' intersection undertwo, four andi six Residential 2/3 lane divided roadway. (5) 4 Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if warranted, subject to interconnect to Golden Gate Parkway. 13 Livingston Road South Quad - 3 Driveway Eliminated. Residential me divided madwar. Footnotes: 1) See Project Access Locations, Golden Gate Parkway Conceptual Roadway Master Plan, Lane Arrangement For Site Access With Interchanges, Sheet I of2, dated April 11. 1989 and revised January 8, 1990, May 23, 1990, and June 11, 1990, and 1ff 25. 2000 2) See llalstatt DRI Master Development Plan, Revised Exhibit If. 3) —5" i o. 199 34) Access conditions identified with cast/west Golden Gate Parkway grade separated at Livingston Road and Airport Road. Should the final design and construction ofihe urban interchange be substantially differcnt than that shown in Exhibit I with Livingston Road and/or Airport Road grade separated rather than Golden Gate Parkway, the final improvements may result in modifications to the above access restrictions. 45) If Livingston Road is grade separated at Golden Gate Parkway, the full median opening identified at Driveway M 12 may be shifted north or south at the time of its construction. 10 of 110 9.C.7 �\F-aaah V r� Packet Pg. 1303 9.C.7 LEGEND EG NERAL NOTES Nwroos Y9wng wxms ,¢ ar n,x w _� Rsr at Ac cuIaDBAI. RESIDENTIAL l) WETLAND PRESERVATION AREAS ARE —• �� —"— '�•��•��••�---- ♦�{I ' p APPROXIMATE AND SILL BE REFINED ` i i AOq (A) 3§ } 4[Q GOLF COURSE DURING THE PERMITTING PROCESS. 1 •°iLt• ii4 �^ lRl GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE FACILITY 2) ALL ACREAGES ARB APPROXIMATE AND i Q _ llp ICL) GOLF COURSE CLUBHOUSE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND/OR VARIATION. n �I [/p EYBRG¢NCT Y8DICAL/FIRB STATION .THE DEVELOPER MAY RELOCATE `AIPUU)�S b fa UO E� LS OFPICE/RETAIL COMMERCIAL UP TO 200 MULTI -FAMILY UNITS I W o�n W n W COYMERCWHOTEL FROM TR! NORTHRBST QUADRANT LS TO TRE NORTHEAST QUADRANT SO 111 I %Yi Y CAN TANG AS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ] 6 TAKE ESSIDENTIAL UNITS IN GREY OAKS DOES NOT EXCEED 1800 UNITS. �_-.�.� 0 •ETIAND (CONSERVATION AREAS) P I 1418 O p PARK�•' p -/ INTERSECTION WITH TURN LANES p n L 9IGNALVATION 0 W Itl ��I L RIGHT IN AND RIGHT OUT I. RIGHT IN AND RIGHT OUT I \ AND SOUTH BOUND LEFT O ,I =41 ® RESIDENTIAL ACCESS ONLY SECURITY GATEHOUSE pu0 I fot 6 0 41 Pq.LEGENDNORTERASIE — — d W o n •0 H D 'COWER COUNTY\ UNITS/S. ACRES I Ix I LS n i i ( ) T °RBSIDENTUU. 113E UNITS 310.9± ) P.xu W 1I OFFICE/RETAIL COMMERCIAL 1,203,081 S.P.C.LA. TOAs kala N HOTEL 250 ROOMS ncuNA 1 66 I N GOLF COURS!/RELREATION/PARK/RIGHT-OF-UAV 54 HOLES 809.31 RNP a ioxIN. CONSERVATION/LAI¢/IIATER MANAGEMENT 124.{1 I I 4 = SUBTOTAL OE Vo \ II i I I Ir (n n RTHE QUADRANT(CITY OF NAPLES) --UZe-1 LS _ i o nn w °RE3IDENTW. 484 UNITS IOB.Ot LJ_ O OFFICE/RETAIL COYYERCW. 100,000 S.F.G.LA. 14.4± ; Qcc COLF COURSE/RECREATION/PARK/RICHT-OF-IAM 18 HOLES 100.5± n n CONSERVATION/IAT3?/IIATBR MANAGEMENT U1 ; LS W lel TO ; L r SUBTOTAL W W OFFICE/RETAIL COYYERCI.AL k HOTEL (NE k B8 QUAD.) 904± O"'l%RETAIL COYYBRCIAL k HOTEL (ALL QUADRANTS) 104.8± —TARE , LS j U O Q d LOYAL PORN:MNA WV(U)UP9E le) LIE rn H.F L �; NLLJ d y p p H MI ac ` d I I U7 o d ! c o 0 p 0 D a C W a omc�o o p G91DEN G1R Q d ESTATES us a yp $ W R LL ---. ` L ° � 006 m Gl c 006 1 r nBaA POFRR •+ 1N9E.EInPE9 (-2) 0 --------- I I I o — - --- - - a> GT6 R PAKRAY UO p1Rl IT� PORNaANN�nLL LS }1 R PAR _d r 4Y6WPm �. �m II I� SELo-a1RP 49S INX 25E 6 D q^ LY. a..e �I C EI o-4.° Ar oxP/m4 cans. cA R 66 a� �—.«o d � eFU.YeS cn.clm by: NP/AJ] � �J o 00 Rrvac sww xrs �+ II I R--- i �I PN:xa40-OSJ-004 ORY9P PAs/: 0-0140-)] •�--1------- ZT. -P; OUCNON------_-Y---•�-- RRIARYOOD NORTH Sneel 1 1 PI Packet Pg. 1304 June 30, 2000 Mr. Daniel Trescott DRI Coordinator SWFRPC P. O. Box 3455 North Fort Myers, FL 33918-3455 Re: Resolution 2000-190/Development Order 2000-04 Dear Mr. Trescott: Transmitted herewith is a certified copy of the above -referenced document, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on Tuesday, June 27, 2000. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Karen Schoch, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 9.C.7 17 E Packet Pg. 1305 June 30, 2000 Mr. Steve Atkins, Planner State of Florida Department of Community Affairs Development of Regional Impact Section Bureau of Land and Water Management 2740 Centerview Drive Tallahassee, FL 32399 Re: Development Order 2000-04/Resolution 2000-190, Grey Oaks Dear Mr. Atkins: Transmitted herewith is a certified copy of the above - referenced document, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on Tuesday, June 27, 2000. Very truly yours, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Karen Schoch, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 9.C.7 17E Packet Pg. 1306 Naples Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTN: TONYA PHILLIPS PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 000586 58075421 DOA -2000-03 NOTICE 0 State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personal Ly appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves as the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples,) in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said tallier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, FLorida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pubLiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: D6/11 AD SPACE: 112.000 INCH FILED ON: 06/12/00 Signature of Affiant /� s Sworn to and Subscribed before me this -day of MCI) Personally known by me c";µV P11Bl,` Susan D Flora My Commission CC561717 Espies Dec. 10, 2000 'f n� r%.oa DOA.2000-03 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Nottte 13 hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier . County will hold o public I The Board will consld- er Petition DOA - 2000.03, George L. Var- nodog Esq. of Young, 4 pact (,DRI),i Developprent Order' "' as amended, �: fior the purposes of rs• locatlno outhorlied ! commercial develop: ment between the 1 nwperytheost afnyd north. hila actQNu lnpnath acreage of taint com- mercid area by 15.6 acres; reducing the number of dwelling units 'by 300; revlslons to golf course acreage and wafer onop e• merrt focUltlesm; revl'yon to access points and must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks .prior to the respective caselcwr nnlnmatelrials In, tended ro be considered by the Board shall be sub - to the opera friaFe County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public Clearing. All materl. W used In presentations before the Board will be - corn a permanent part of the record. Any Person who decid- es to appeal a dectsion of the Board will need a re- tard of the proceedings perfainino thereto and therefore may need to a Of a verbatim record of the ptoceedinps Is made, which record In- cludes the testtmony and evidence upon which the appeal Is based'_ BOARD OF'COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COODUNTY, FLORIDA' TIMOTHY J. CONSTANTINE,!� - CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BDv /s/Elllle offmgt, �seEpoutLy} June 1 t No. 1630107 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1307 DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 13- 01 RESOLUTION NO. 13- 122 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 90-292 (DEVELOPMENT ORDER 90-3, AS AMENDED) FOR THE HALSTATT/GREY OAKS DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER BY (A) EXTENDING THE PHASE III COMPLETION DATE, THE BUILD -OUT DATE AND THE EXPIRATION DATE; AND (B) REVISING REFERENCES REGARDING THE MONITORING REPORT REQUIREMENT; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; AND SECTION FOUR, EFFECT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DEVELOPMENT ORDERS, TRANSMITTAL TO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND AIRPORT -PULLING ROAD IN SECTIONS 24, 25 AND 26, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (PETITION DOA- PL20130000492) WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County approved Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order No. 90-3), which approved a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) known as the Halstatt DRI (now known as the Grey Oaks DRI) on June 6, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Application for Development Approval (ADA) was incorporated into and, by reference, made a part of the Development Order; and WHEREAS, the real property which is the subject of the Development Order is legally described and set forth as Exhibit A to Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order No. 90-3); and wit: WHEREAS, the Development Order has been subsequently amended several times, to (i) Resolution No. 90-498 (Development Order No. 90-5), October 16, 1990; (ii) Resolution No. 90-571, November 27, 1990; (iii) Resolution No. 98-472 (Development Order No. 98-2), November 24, 1998; (iv) Resolution No. 98-471, November 24, 1998; (v) Resolution No. 00-190 (Development Order No. 00-04), June 27, 2000; (vi) Resolution No. 07-99 (Development Order No. 07-02), April 24, 2007; (vii) Resolution No. 09-269 (Development Order No. 09-01), November 10, 2009; and Grey Oaks DRI/PUD — DOA-PL20130000492 1 of 5 Rev. 5/20/13 9.C.7 CAS Packet Pg. 1308 9.C.7 WHEREAS, the Halstatt, LLC (formerly, the Halstatt Partnership), through its authorized agent, has filed a Development Order Amendment (DOA) Application and Notice of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved DRI (NOPC), which NOPC is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission reviewed and considered the report and recommendation of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC) and held a public hearing on May 16, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the governing body of the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, with jurisdiction pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider proposed changes to the Grey Oaks DRI; and WHEREAS, at a public hearing held on June 11, 2013, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, in accordance with Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, having considered (a) the DOA Application and the NOPC, (b) the record made at the aforementioned hearing, (c) the record of the documentary and oral evidence presented to the Collier County Planning Commission, (d) the report and recommendation of Collier County planning staff, and (d) the report and recommendation of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Counsel, the Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the following Grey Oaks DRI Development Order amendments. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER A. Paragraph 8 (entitled "General Considerations"), subparagraph b, of the "Conclusions of Law" section of Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order No. 90-3, as amended) (page 15) is revised to read as follows: The development phasing schedule set forth in the PUD Document (Table II, Exhibit G) is incorporated as a condition of approval. However, in accordance with Section 380.06(19)(c)--F.S. (2007), applicant provided the required notice,• and due to recent real estate market conditions, both the Phase III completion date and the DRI build -out date are extended to June 5. 2013. If development order conditions and applicant commitments incorporated within the development order, ADA or sufficiency round responses to mitigate regional impact are not carried out as indicated to the extent or in accord with the schedules specified within the development order, then this shall be presumed to be a substantial deviation for the affected regional issue. Grey Oaks DRI/PUD — DOA-PL20130000492 2 of 5 Rev. 5/20/13 CA Packet Pg. 1309 B. The first sentence of Paragraph 2 (unentitled section following "Be It Further Resolved") of Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order No. 90-3, as amended) (page 17) is revised to read as follows: 2. This Development Order shall remain in effect f - seventeen07) until October 16, 2018. C. Paragraph 5 (unentitled section following `Be it Further Resolved") of Resolution No. 90-292 (Development Order No. 90-3, as amended (page 17) is revised as follows: The applicant or its successor(s) in title to the subject property shall submit a report biennially, commencing one year from the effective date of this development order, to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, and the Department of Gefwnunity Affairs Economic Opportunity. This report shall contain the information required in Section 95(7), 73C-40.025(7), Florida Administrative Code. This report shall be prepared in accordance with the "DRI Meni ewng feFmW, Foran DEO-BCP-BIENNIAL REPORT -1, as may be amended, provided by the SWFRPC. Failure to submit the biennial report shall be governed by Subsection 380.06(18), Florida Statutes. SECTION TWO: FINDINGS OF FACT A. The proposed changes to the previously approved Grey Oaks DRI do not meet or exceed any of the criteria listed in Section 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. B. Pursuant to Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, the applicant submitted the NOPC to the City of Naples, Collier County, the SWFRPC and the Department of Economic Opportunity. C. The DOA Application and the NOPC are in accordance with Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. D. The proposed changes to the previously approved Development Order are consistent with the report and recommendation of the SWFRPC. E. The development is not in an area designated an Area of Critical State Concern pursuant to Section 380.05, Florida Statutes. F. No increase in development intensity is authorized by this Resolution. Grey Oaks DRUPUD — DOA-PL20130000492 3 of 5 Rev. 5/20/13 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1310 SECTION THREE: CONCLUSIONS OF LAW A. The proposed changes to the previously approved Grey Oaks DRI do not constitute a substantial deviation, as set forth in Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, and therefore do not require further Development of Regional Impact review. B. The proposed changes to the previously approved Grey Oaks DRI will not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the area. C. The proposed changes to the previously approved Grey Oaks DRI are consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Collier County Land Development Code adopted pursuant thereto. D. The proposed changes to the previously approved Grey Oaks DRI are consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan. SECTION FOUR: EFFECT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DEVELOPMENT ORDER, AS AMENDED: TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY: AND EFFECTIVE DATE A. Except as amended hereby, Development Order 90-3, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, binding in accordance with its terms on all parties thereto. B. Copies of this Development Order/Resolution shall be transmitted immediately upon execution to the Department of Economic Opportunity (Division of Community Planning and Development) and the SWFRPC. C. This Development Order/Resolution shall take effect as provided by law. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this _LL day of lu , 2013. ATTER] .t fi� .c� BO DaV iI )♦. $1W64- JERK CO Byr By: DgpuiX erk signature only Grey Oaks DRI/PUD — DOA-PL20130000492 4 of 5 Rev. 5/20/13 (COMMISSIONERS FLORIDA GIA -A. HILLER, ESQ. Chairwoman 9.C.7 CAS Packet Pg. 1311 Approved as to form and legality: �-) 4 A �� Cl 0 Heidi Ashton-Cicko � ro Managing Assistant County attorney Attachment: Exhibit A — Notice of Proposed Change CP\13-CPS-01216\29 Grey Oaks DRI/PUD — DOA-PL20130000492 5 of 5 Rev. 5/20/13 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1312 FORM DEO-BCP-PROPCHANGE-1 Rule 73C-40.010, FAC. Effective 11-20-90 (Renumbered 10-01-11) STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY DIVISION OF COMMUNITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT The Caldwell Building, MSC 160 107 East Madison Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399 NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning agency, and the state land planning agency according to this form. 1. I, John M. Passidomo, the undersigned authorized representative of the Halstatt, LLC (formerly, the Halstatt Partnership), hereby give notice of a proposed change to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. In support thereof, I submit the following information concerning the Grey Oaks DRI (formerly known as the Halstatt DRI) development, which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have submitted today, under separate cover, copies of this completed notification to the following: Collier County, the City of Naples, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, and the Division of Community Planning and Development, Department of Economic Opportunity. /�5��..� Date -- Signature Exhibit A 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1313 2. Applicant: Halstatt, LLC 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, Florida 34105 (239) 262-2600 3. Authorized Agent: John M. Passidomo, Esq. Cheffy Passidomo, P.A. 821 Fifth Avenue South Naples, Florida 34102 (239) 261-9300 4. Location (City, County, Township/Range/Section) of approved DRI and proposed change: Sections 24, 25 and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. 5. Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build -out date, development order conditions and requirements, or to the representations contained in either the development order or the Application for Development Approval. Indicate such changes on the project master site plan, supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts. The Grey Oaks DRI (formerly known as the Halstatt DRI) consists of 1,601 acres located within the northeast, southeast and northwest quadrants formed by the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road. The intersection forms the center of a designed "Activity Center" in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The northwest quadrant of the Grey Oaks DRI, consisting of 354 acres, Is within the jurisdiction of the City of Naples. The northeast and southeast quadrants of the Grey Oaks DRI, consisting of 1,247 acres, are located in unincorporated Collier County. The initial Grey Oaks DRI Development Order (D.O. 90-3) was Issued by Collier County Resolution No. 90-292 on June 6, 1990. The City of Naples approved the portion of the DRI within its jurisdiction on October 17, 1990, in Resolution No. 90-6211. Subsequent amendments to the County and City DRI Development Orders are described in response to question 7 below. Corresponding extensions to the Phase III completion dates and the expiration dates of the Development Orders are also proposed, such that those dates will coincide with the proposed build -out dates. See below: 2 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1314 91 9.C.7 Current Collier County: Build -out date June 6, 2013 Phase III completion date June 6, 2013 Expiration date June 6, 2015 City of Naples: Build -out date October 17, 2013 Phase III completion date October 17, 2013 Expiration date October 17, 2012 Proposed June 5, 2018 June 5, 2018 June 5, 2018 October 16, 2018 October 16, 2018 October 16, 2018 Pursuant to Section 380.06(19)(c)1, Florida Statutes, this proposed change to the DRI is not a substantial deviation. Moreover, pursuant to Section 380.06(19)(e)1, Florida Statutes, this proposed change is not subject to the public hearing requirements of subparagraph (f)3 and is not subject to a determination pursuant to subparagraph (95. Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, indicate no change. No change. 7. List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate identification numbers) of all modifications or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the previous changes (i.e., any information not already addressed in the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart). Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? a. On October 16, 1990, pursuant to an agreement between Collier County and the Department of Community Affairs, Collier County issued an amended Development Order (D.O. 90-5) through the adoption of Resolution No. 90-498. b. On November 27, 1990, to correct a scrivener's error in Development Order 90-5, Collier County adopted Resolution No. 99-571, which added the words "apply for or" to the third sentence of Section 5, Subsection d.(4) of Development Order 90- 4. C. On October 7, 1998, the City of Naples adopted Resolution No. 98-8372, which amended the Master Plan and approved a total of 18 golf holes located within the northwest quadrant of the DRI. 3 Packet Pg. 1315 9.C.7 d. On November 24, 1998, in response to the NOPC submitted by the Halstatt Partnership, Collier County issued Development Order 98-2, through the adoption of Resolution No. 98-472, which amended the Development Order and Master Plan to reduce the number of residential units to 1,900, increase the number of golf holes to 72, shift the site of the hotel use to the southeast quadrant, and increase the conservation, lakes and preservation areas from 180.1 acres to 236.78 acres. e. On June 27, 2000, in response to the NOPC submitted by the Halstatt Partnership and Naples Golf Course Holdings, Ltd., Collier County issued Development Order 2000-04, through the adoption of Resolution No. 2000-190, which amended the Development Order and Master Plan to internally relocate already -approved uses and reduce the number of residential units to 1,600. f. On October 18, 2000, the City of Naples adopted Resolution No. 00-8971-A, which was a companion amendment to Collier County's issuance of Development Order 2000-04, described immediately above in subparagraph e. g. On April 24, 2007, in response to an NOPC, Collier County Issued Development Order 07-02, through the adoption of Resolution No. 09-99, which reduced commercial -allotted acreage and increased the number of residential units to 1,775. h. On September 12, 2007, the Halstatt Partnership provided Notification of Extension of a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Section 380.06(19)(c), Florida Statutes (as amended by Section 6 of Chapter 2007- 204, Laws of Florida), and recorded the corresponding Notice in Official Records Book 4322, Page 2286, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. This notification automatically granted a 3 -year extension to the phase, buildout and expiration dates of the Development Orders issued by Collier County and the City of Naples, respectively, as follows: Collier County: Phase III completion date June 6, 2013 Build -out date June 6, 2013 Expiration date June 6, 2015 City of Naples: Phase III completion date October 17, 2013 Build -out date October 17, 2013 Expiration date October 17, 2010 On December 29, 2010, the Halstatt Partnership provided Notification of Extension of a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact pursuant to 4 Packet Pg. 1316 Section 46 of Chapter 2010-147, Laws of Florida, which notification automatically granted a 2 -year extension to the expiration date of the Development Order issued by the City of Naples, such that the expiration date was extended to October 17, 2012. 8. Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DRI development order. Identify such land, its size, intended use, and adjacent non -project land uses within Y2 mile on a project master site plan or other map. .61 10. None. Indicate if the proposed change is less than 40% (cumulatively with other previous changes) of any of the criteria listed in Paragraph 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)2., F.S. YES NO XX* * Pursuant to Section 380.06(19)(c)1, Florida Statutes, this proposed change to the DRI is not a substantial deviation. Moreover, pursuant to Section 380.06(19)(e)1, Florida Statutes, this proposed change is not subject to the public hearing requirements of subparagraph (f)3 and is not subject to a determination pursuant to subparagraph (f)5. Does the proposed change result in a change to the buildout date or any phasing date of the project? If so, indicate the proposed new buildout or phasing dates. Yes. Current Proposed Collier County: Build -out date June 6, 2013 June 5, 2018 Phase III completion date June 6, 2013 June 5, 2018 Expiration date June 6 2015 June 5, 2018 City of Naples: Build -out date October 17, 2013 October 16, 2018 Phase III completion date October 17, 2013 October 16, 2018 Expiration date October 17, 2012 October 16, 2018 5 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1317 9.C.7 11. Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan? No. Provide the following for incorporation into such an amended development order, pursuant to Subsections 380.06(15), F.S., and 73-40.025, Florida Administrative Code: 12. An updated master site plan or other map of the development portraying and distinguishing the proposed changes to the previously approved DRI or development order conditions. No change to Master Plan. 13. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(f), F.S., include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. This language should address and quantify: All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build -out date of the development; to development order conditions and requirements; to commitments and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; Paragraph 8 (entitled "General Considerations"), subparagraph b, in both the County and the City's Development Orders, as amended, is revised to read as follows (additions are underlined): The development phasing schedule set forth in the PUD Document (Table II, Exhibit G) is incorporated as a condition of approval. However, due to recent real estate market conditions both the Phase III completion date and the DRI build -out date are extended to June 5 2018 for development in Collier County and October 16 2018 for development in the City of Naples. If development order conditions and applicant commitments incorporated within the development order, ADA or sufficiency round responses to mitigate regional impact are not carried out as indicated to the extent or in accord with the schedules specified within the development order, then this shall be presumed to be a substantial deviation for the affected regional issue. The first sentence of Paragraph 2 (unentitled section following "Be It Further Resolved") in the County's Development Order, as amended, is revised to read as follow (additions are underlined, deletions are stFicken thFGUg4): 6 Packet Pg. 1318 This Development Order shall remain in effect f9F twenty two (22) years until June 5, 2018. The first sentence of Paragraph 2 (unentitled section following "Be It Further Resolved") in the City'ss Development Order, as amended, is revised to read as follow (additions are underlined, deletions are Will sugh): This Development Order shall remain in effect f^. seyente (17;— � fFGFR the date of adoption until October 16 2018. b. An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage is/has been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development; No change to legal description. C. A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical development of the proposed changes, if applicable; No change to commencement of physical development date. d. A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development; The proposed changes to the Phase III completion dates, build -out dates and expiration dates are set forth In paragraph 13.a above. e. A proposed amended development order date until which the local government agrees that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down -zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, if applicable; and The proposed changes to the Phase III completion dates, build -out dates and expiration dates are set forth in paragraph 13.a above. f. Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report, including the date of submission, contents, and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in Subsection 73C-40.025 (7), F.A.C. No change. 7 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1319 9.C.7 Sharon Umpenhour From: Jim Butler <JButler@greyoakscc.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 12:28 PM To: Wayne Arnold Cc: Rafael Silva; John English (JEnglish@barroncollier.com); Jeannie Manos Subject: FW: Grey Oaks Access for O'Donnell Nursery Attachments: JimButler 06-2017L.PDF; Access Relocation Exhibit.pdf Wayne, Grey Oaks has no objection to this proposal. Both the Country Club and the Property Owner's Chairmen, and myself, the General Manager has approved. Please let this email serve as official notice if possible. Thanks Jim ,dim Butler Genera0lanager 2400 Grey Oaks Drive North Naples, FL 34105 (239) 262-5550 (Club) (239) 262-3593 (Fax) Email: JButlerOGrevOaksCC.com www.Grey0aksCC.co Note: If you have received this communication in error please delete all copies of the original message and attachments. From: Jim Butler Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:03 PM To: Jim Butler Subject: FW: Grey Oaks Access for O'Donnell Nursery ,dim Butler General lWanager 2400 Grey Oaks Drive North Naples, FL 34105 (239) 262-5550 (Club) (239) 262-3593 (Fax) Email: JButler(a)GrevOaksCC.com www.GreyOaksCC.com Note: If you have received this communication in error please delete all copies of the original message and attachments. From: Wayne Arnold [mailto:WArnold@gradyminor.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 8:27 AM To: Jim Butler Packet Pg. 1320 9.C.7 Cc: 'John English'; Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Grey Oaks Access for O'Donnell Nursery Hello Jim, I am assisting Al O'Donnell with his landscape nursery improvements within the FP&L easement adjacent to Livingston Road. Al is trying to obtain dedicated access for his nursery operations from Livingston Road. We are proposing to amend the Grey Oaks PUD and DRI master plans to eliminate two previously approved but unused access points and add the two proposed access points on Livingston Road. We would appreciate it if you could review the attached information and provide us with a letter of no objection. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact John English or me. Thank you, Wayne D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Planning Director GradyMinor 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Phone - 239.947.1144 Fax - 239.947.0375 Web - http://www.,gradyminor.com DISCLAIMER: This communication from Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., along with any attachments or electronic data is intended only for the addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or otherwise exempt from disclosure. The recipient agrees and accepts the following conditions: The electronic file/data is for informational purposes only and is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this electronic file/data with the approved and certified "plan of record" along with actual project site conditions. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. reserves the right to revise, update and improve its electronically stored data without notice and assumes no responsibility due to a virus or damages caused by receiving this email. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 1321 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petitions PI.20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PI.20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes ofthis requirement, the names and addresses ofproperty owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be noted The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property own�'s list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of C4mplianee. Applicant) State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 7th day of June, 2018 by Sharon Umpenhour, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. 1 (5i of ublic} (Notary seal) Tiffany bray Printed Name of Notary �':�t 13Ray # * MY C4MMI551QN # FF 9440 EXPIRES: March 1, 2320 Banded ihru Budget Notary Ser+iees G.1NIM Procedures/Affidavit Of Complimce - NIM June 25 201 S.Docx 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1322 GradyMinor 9.C.7 Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners * Landscape Architects June 7, 2018 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM); PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Dear Property Owner: You are invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. (Applicant) on: Monday, June 25, 2018, 5:30 pm At Naples Church of Christ, Main Auditorium, 12760 Livingston Rd, Naples, FL 34105 O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. has submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of an amendment to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and an amendment to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI). This application proposes to amend the DRI/PUD to remove two conceptual access points, one located on Airport Road north of Golden Gate Parkway and one on Golden Gate Parkway east of Airport Road and add two conceptual access points on Livingston Road north of Golden Gate Parkway. The access points being removed have not been built to date. The proposed access points would only provide access to two parcels located within the FPL easement on the west side of Livingston Road and would not provide access to any other portions of property located within the Grey Oaks development. The subject property within the Grey Oaks DRI/PUD (Property I.D. Numbers 47790008537 & 47790038426) is comprised of approximately 32± acres, located on the Northwest quadrant of Livingston Road and in Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail to: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134. Sincerely, Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 www.gradyminor.com Packet Pg. 1323 .� � J�w•rs�aa�rGM a ':� �,i:t st'.q-f - 7 �u.l ,' F t�.r.lfrZt r.►w. a�� =;S C T e� ♦� � "' '•� ` ��ypfwFr fir,} r ,�G _��(. �_r.�� ► ' t� i1i yyv'j� �� 1 _'�' �}rT/ttl:l. r ao— t* 70 �; 1 mss/ _, w � • '� +iAx � Y`° ,. a 7 A► ,� + p,y�4�, •qr.y .. a Aida , Grey Oaks DRI/PUD T. F IP 1 • r a9 it 7'' °� •"� .� �.- .f •� ya '1 • � �Tr 40J, 1 ice`+ () r'v.+yrvi�livfr4 p4T .� • ill fit •+ i ail-'� '� ��' Ur - o D • ou- -� - o-ao � ao .o �. i 1&—I!l"'.�►. ''.:�• ?, ; .° o D F s 9 o'= . o 0 0` o o• o e' •1 1 :11 900 0 1,800 Feet sisno� 9.C.7 i i N Y IC 0 Packet Pg. 1325 sisno� 9.C.7 i i N Y IC 0 Packet Pg. 1326 sisno� 9.C.7 i i N Y IC 0 Packet Pg. 1327 sisno� 9.C.7 i i N Y IC 0 Packet Pg. 1328 Packet Pg. 1329 111111111. 1- IL PK SESI AS: OOMM — Cl I SEC IE, s 11.- 1 IS DOO E 1 1111111 IIN I lAl- 11111AL ax�MxI . S_ ON ON E 0 I.. IN 0 1 — N" I L.11 I LIII I I 11 I"I I I'l I IS. I I'l I N;1111 .11--- 1 _O. �.1ED.1 I'l N S', ==NIN .1S O III I.. IIIIES, 11 1111 111 11 Al 1111 IIKI L... __,E ON LEO IN I_N IN N S"O, IN IIIIES 11 N 1 =1Z2 11 1CI"AA- C* =:LL .. IA I. - :A'l -=l C14 D=- 11 ISONOO.'N". N_ Q CD C.CN"'I.T'SSMSEO 10 11 S, ==Plll Al, Il .1 11-1 ON SO E=1 MxxMe,o N IA I DA AZES 1111 Nll Lm7l,o111,1 I IA E�=l ESIOE ONE NA- ICONNllNl— NAZ.1. 11 11. NA 11 � P.0 I.. ElE NIA I- S -00 1. N .1 111IM. 0 NA:.l. 11 I'll = IN AI�K, N"I CINIININ—142. mzo U III Ol Nll of 111/I LESS N 1- LESS ll.. NIA IN. III I . II IS u IS II ION.O NA N=M°;va I.". 711N.1 IS, III ASE NA NAZ'. NA L.ElNEllCC.Nl L�S 1' 7.1 ElIC I N I 1 —.1 1� ELK 11 LL NAZ.' =".N II S, N NA -1 IINN I IONEI—I.. EIM -1 NAIL., IL —El -1 S111.ISl _lIN,lD 11 1 1111NI —ON" ILKIL11 S _,_ OSO N,EE, SIS, N S1. NA -m, _ 1 EE EN NAZ.I: ll�l III u NA NAZI I�E: 1111 NI 1 2 NA IS: NIZ.1. NA ,lEN NCI.IA_ N', I.D= N_ Packet Pg. 1329 9.C.7 i i N Y IC 0 Packet Pg. 1330 N 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1331 9.C.7 i i N Y IC 0 Packet Pg. 1332 sisno� 9.C.7 i i N Y IC 0 Packet Pg. 1333 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1334 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1335 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1336 d 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1337 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1338 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1339 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1340 9.C.7 Naptrs 4:3aitij Zrvjs Nap ;.Com Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that shy serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published ii said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na pies, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in sai( Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as secon( class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next precedin! the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid no promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing thi! advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES PA Pub Dates June 7, 2018 al- j-� (Sig ture of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me This June 07, 2018 �� and f q P/A (Signature of affiant) 2028698 Grey Oaks DRI/PUD P.O.# 0 as c� in cu x C6 N ti 0 0 0 It— C4 N J d a Packet Pg. 1341 KARGLEKANGAS =_ Notary Public -State ofFlorlda Commisslon#GGIMI ^°`„`,�•• My Comm.ExplresJul29,2021 9ondadthrough Nae.%1fttMyAwr, P.O.# 0 as c� in cu x C6 N ti 0 0 0 It— C4 N J d a Packet Pg. 1341 Fact -checking Trump on border separations Anne Flaherty ASSOCIATED PRESS WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump is falsely claiming that "bad leg- islation passed by the Democrats" has forced his administration to separate children from their families at the bor- der, even though no such law exists. Trump's tweet Trump tweeted Tuesday: "Separat- ing families at the Border is the fault of bad legislation passed by the Demo- crats. Border Security laws should be changed but the Dems can't get their act together! Started the Wall" The facts No law mandates that parents must be separated from their children at the border, and it's not a policy Democrats have pushed or can change alone as the minority in Congress. Children are probably being separat- ed from the parents at the border at an accelerated rate because of a new "zero tolerance policy" being implemented by Trump's own administration. An- nounced April 6 by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the policy directs authori- ties to prosecute all instances of illegal border crossings, even against people with few or no previous offenses. Administration officials are quick to President Donald Trump signs the VA Mission Act on Wednesday at the White House Rose Garden In Washington. SHAWN THEW/EPA-EFE New law allows more private care for veterans Trump celebrates `choice' in signing Donovan Slack USA TODAY WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump signed a bill Wednesday paving the way for a major overhaul of the De- partment of Veterans Affairs and ex- panded access for veterans to VA - funded care in the private sector. The measure, which passed both chambers of Congress last month with overwhelming bipartisan support, de- livers on a key campaign promise for Trump, who pledged to provide veter- ans with more non -VA health care choices. "What a beautiful word that is - choice - and freedom to our amazing veterans," Trump said at the signing ceremony. All dining the campaign I'd go out and say, `why can't they just go see a doctor instead of standing in line for weeks and weeks and weeks?' Now they can go see a doctor'_" Working out the details of exactly how and when that will happen is now up to agency officials tasked with drawing up regulations under the law. If confirmed, Trump's pick to lead the VA, Robert Wilkie, would lead that effort. Criteria include wait times for VA appointments, quality of VA care and distance from a VA facility. Known as the VA Mission Act, the law directs the VA to combine a num- ber of existing private -care programs, including the so-called Choice pro- gram, which was created in 2014 after veterans died waiting for appoint- ments at the Phoenix VA. Two veterans from Texas who trav- eled to Washington to be at the signing said the Choice program has been ex- tremely helpful for them. Laura Vela, who served in the U.S. Army, and Air Force veteran Antonio Garcia said they previously had to drive nearly four hours each way to reach the newest VA hospital in San Antonio. "To me, it's the perfect program," said Garcia, who had his knee replaced last yen by a health care provider about a half mile from his home in Known as the VA Mission Act, the law directs the VA to combine a number of existing private -care programs, including the so-called Choice program, which was created in 2014 after veterans died waiting for appointments at the Phoenix VA. expense for gall bladder surgery. "It is strengthening our health care, and I think it will improve the health care and welfare of all of our veterans." The law also creates a commission to recommend which VA facilities we worth repairing, where new ones should be built, and which ones should be closed and care provided in the pri- vate sector instead. The measure includes some incen- tives to help the VA hire more health care providers. It allows the agency to provide scholarships to medical stu- dents in exchange for their pledging to work w VA. Currently some 33,000 po- sitions are unfilled at the agency. In addition, the law provides pre -9/ 11 veterans with benefits to help cover the cost of in-home care -givers. Such benefits previously were provided only to post -9/11 veterans. The VA will be allowed to set up pi- lot programs to test how to deliver bet- ter care more efficiently, including with public-private partnerships. "We're really encouraged about that," said Tony Tersigni, president of Ascension, the Ingest non-profit health system in the country. He dismissed concerns that such moves might mark the first step to- ward privatizing the VA. "There's certain things that the VA has truly become world specialists in note that Sessions' policy makes no mention of separating families. That is correct. But under U.S. protocol, if par- ents are jailed, their children are sepa- rated from them because the children aren't charged with a crime. So while separating families might not be official U.S. policy, it is a direct consequence of Sessions' zero -toler- ance approach. (Worth noting too is that John Kelly, now Trump's chief of staff, spoke in 2017 about possibly separating parents from children as a way to dis- suade parents from trying to cross the border.) According to U.S. Customs and Bor- der Protection, more than 650 children were separated from parents at the her- der during a two-week period in May. The U.N. human rights office has called on the Trump administration to "immediately halt" the separations, saying "detention is never in the best in- terests of the child and always constitu- tes a child rights violation: Trump might be referring to a 2008 law passed unanimously by Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, but that legislation is focused on children who illegally cross the bor- der without a guardian, known as unac- companied minors. That law calls for re- leasing children into the "least restric- tive setting" — often to family or a gov- ernment -run shelter — while their cases slowly wind through immigration court. Trump grants clemency in drug case Gregory Korte USA TODAY WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump granted clemency Wednesday to a Tennessee great-grandmother serving a life sentence for cocaine traf- ficking after hearing a plea from reality television star Kim Kardashian West in an Oval Office meeting. Alice Marie Johnson, who celebrat- ed her 63rd birthday last week, had her life sentence commuted to time served after 22 years. She was released from federal prison later Wednesday. It was Kardashian West who in- formed Johnson of the president's de- cision, said Shawn Holley, the Kar- dashian lawyer who helped advocate for clemency. "I just got off the most wonderful, emotional and amazing phone call with Alice, Kim and Alice's lawyers," she said. "It was a moment I will never forget. Once Alice's family joined the call, the tens never stopped flowing." Johnson was convicted in 1996 of five counts of drug trafficking and one count of money laundering and sen- tenced to life in prison — despite the fact that it was her first offense. "Ms. Johnson has accepted respon- sibility for her past behavior and has been a model prisoner over the past two decades," White House press sec- retary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said. "While this administration will always be very tough on crime, it believes that those who have paid their debt to soci- ety and worked hard to better them- selves while in prison deserve a sec- ond chance" Johnson's plea for clemency was denied by President Barack Obarea just weeks before he left office in 2017. But a long list of officials — con- gressmen, the U.S. attorney and even the warden at her prison — have asked the pardon attorney to reconsider. At 63 years old I am closer to heav- en than to earth," Johnson wrote the judge in her case last year. "I'm a bro- ken woman. More time in prison can- not accomplish more justice.' While Obamrecommenda- tions took recomenda- tions from the Justice Department's Office of Pardon Attorney, Trump has bypassed that process to grant par- dons in high-profile cases like former Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Bush White House aide Scooter Libby, and former heavyweight champion Jack Johnson. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PL2017D001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. (Applicant) on: Monday, June 25, 2018, 5:30 pm At Naples Church of Christ, Main Auditorium, 12760 Livingston Rd, Naples, FL 34105 O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. has submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of an amendment to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and an amendment to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI). This application proposes to amend the DRI/PUD to remove two conceptual access points, one located on Airport Road north of Golden Gate Parkway and one on Golden Gate Parkway east of Airport Road and add two conceptual access points on Livingston Road north of Golden Gate Parkway. The access points being removed have not been built to date. The proposed access points would only provide access to two parcels located within the FPL easement on the west side of Livingston Road and would not provide access to any other portions of property located within the Grey Oaks development. The subject property within the Grey Oaks DRI/PUD (Property I.D. Numbers 47790008537 & 47790038426) is comprised of approximately 32f acres, located on the Northwest quadrant of Livingston Road and in Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail to: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician 0. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 ch- - Od7 11 AA Fn- - GA7 n- a„mnnnhn„rrrinrnrlvminnr rnm 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1342 9.C.7 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PL20170D01548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) June 25, 2018 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***Please be advised*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future pubrc meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mai€ address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site Y for additional information. O NAME:� 0 r EMAIL: N r— EB 1 I—L-acq;�) RZ T 1M 1y VI C ADDRESS: PHONE: � JI� j I 2 NAME: 2>"A4 c1..r L J EMAIL: ']�5it�p� N ADDRESS: J , i PHONE: _Z 3 0 0 ti NAME: Ice) I) Cc )'o a � k-f� EMAIL: � U L. L til � l` l � 1� C7 � [y lU 1} C ,�i.' f `` N ii ADDRESS: W c �' PVre �Ai U PHONE: �7 zi — d —:Y' �� M 5 �{ Ls coo NAME: EMAIL - ADDRESS: PHONE: .2 c+ry v Q CL NAME: EMAIL: - Q LL ADDRESS: PHONE: y E t v ca NAME: EMAIL: Q ADDRESS: PHONE: c m - E t v NAME: EMAIL: .r a ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 06/25/2018 Packet Pg. 1343 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and P!_20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) June 25, 2018 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and Future public meetings_ Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as weft as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: k� % ��I1 EMAIL: I 061� V V ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: - EMAIL: 31; ADDRESS:`� �-' PHONE: NAME: a/ I C-4 EMAIL: ADDRESS: f "1, /oD per,}+ l 1 PHONE: Q�� 9.C.7 NAME: ')ea_N fp S- -P.(/, EMAIL: ' $ �Cr� fJ �.G-E ✓ '�� C✓J .+v1�t I - c �•-�. ADi]Fi�� E evw�r� W PHONE.- NAME: HONE: NAME: 74( E t L EMAIL: ADDRESS: k1' I l 4 ij PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 06/25/2018 EWA ^. N O t9 Mh 2 C6 N t` 0 0 0 ti 0 N J d rn Cl) t0 c 0 r .Q a a LL c a� E Q c m E t v .r a Packet Pg. 1344 9.C.7 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Wayne Arnold: Okay, let's get the meeting started I guess. I'm Wayne Arnold. I'm with Grady Minor and Associates. This is Sharon Umpenhour from our office. She'll be recording the meeting tonight. Uh, The County requires that we record these meetings and then create a — a verbatim transcript of the meeting in support of the planning commission members and the County Commissioners to review. Uh, with us tonight, Al O'Donnell is the property owner of the subject property tonight. And, Norm Trebilcock is Tranportation Engineer. John English behind him is with Barron Collier Companies Peninsula Engineering, he's the engineering record. And, um, this is Nancy Gundlach. Nancy is with Collier County Government. — Nancy Gundlach: — Hello. Wayne Arnold: — She's principal planner and she's here to monitor and answer any County related questions but, technically it's our meeting to explain to the members of the public what it is that we're attempting to do. So, we'll try to do that. I have a brief presentation and then turn it over to anybody who might have a question. So, what we're doing is amending the zoning document that's required of the Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact and the Planned Unit Development zoning. They had one common master plan for both of those documents. And, what we're proposing to do is to eliminate two unused access points. One on Airport Road and one on Golden Gate Parkway, and then create two new access points on Livingston Road that would only serve Mr. O'Donnell's property. He's got about 32 acres that is encumbered entirely under the FP&L easement south of the Grey Oaks entrance on the west side of Livingston Road. And, The County requires us to go through this process. So, we'll be going through the process of creating a new Master Plan exhibit. The County has asked us to create a couple of cleanup items in the PUD document itself, one of which is to allow them to build a multi- use path someday across a portion of Mr. O'Donnell's property. So, we'll have a commitment that allows them to do that. That'll be added. But, um, it's related to the request for the access point. That's an overall aerial exhibit outline of all of Grey Oaks. You can see that it's almost entirely built out. It's about 1600 acres and about 1600 dwelling units with commercial components and senior housing. That's, uh, the approved Master Concept Plan. It's hard to Page 1 of 10 Packet Pg. 1345 9.C.7 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM see but the access points there for instance, there for instance, main entrance here, main entrance over here, those are shown on the Master Plan, and that's what we're attempting to revise. You can see it — it's really hard to read on — here, let me go to the different exhibit to show that more clearly. This is an excerpt of the Master Plan but the two clouded areas on the south and west, that's an unused access point that was going to serve as a commercial tract at the Grey Oaks project. And then, the other one is on Golden Gate Parkway, where the arrow is, and it — it's labelled, "Relocate access point" up here. And then, if you look to the right of the page we're showing the two proposed relocated access points that would only serve — thank you whoever has them — the pointer, they uh, that would only serve Mr. O'Donnell's property within the — FP&L ea — FP&L easement. Those would not be access points that would service a — any of the residential component of the Grey Oaks PUD. This is a little bit of a, aerial exhibit that shows more of the FP&L easement and you can see the relationship of the proposed access points that we're showing. There's a directional left turn made right now and we're proposing that that would continue to be a directional left into this parcel, and then, on the south end where the construction road was just north of the FP&L facility, that would be a right and right of access point servicing Mr. O'Donnell's operation. The PUD is — been approved. All the uses are permitted. We're not proposing any new uses for the PUD. So, it allows for storage that FP&L easement allows for maintenance yard, landscape nurseries, et cetera, and we will be doing everything that's permitted under the PUD. And, that in a nutshell was — say, I'm gonna put this other exhibit back up, just to show you again on the Master Plan. But, that's really in essence the — the amendments that we're proposing to the PUD. I'd be happy to answer any questions. I know we've had a few emails from, probably some of your neighbors, but, um, anything we can answer we'll certainly try. Jean Foster: Just, uh, to clarify — Wayne Arnold: — Okay, if I could, one —just for one second. We're — The County's been very particular about, uh, getting things on the record so, if I could have anybody who wants to speak just speak into the microphone — Page 2of10 Packet Pg. 1346 9.C.7 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 N I M Jean Foster: — Okay. Wayne Arnold: — so we make sure that it's recorded, and if you don't mind giving your name. Jean Foster: Sure, sure. Not my social security — Wayne Arnold: — Correct. Jean Foster: Okay. Jean Foster: Um, my name is Jean Foster, and I live in Wyndemere Country Club, which is directly opposite the, uh, the property. Uh, one of the questions I have is, just so that I — I'm clear about it, uh, to enter the property heading northbound on Livingston from Golden Gate, you would be able to turn left in that turn lane and cut across traffic? Wayne Arnold: Yes, this is Wayne Arnold again. And yes, there is an existing left turn lane, and you're familiar with it I'm sure. — Jean Foster: — Right. Wayne Arnold: — It's south of your entrance and south of the signalized intersection with y — with Grey Oaks and Wyndemere. So yes, the idea would be that that turn lane would then create a drive entrance into Mr. O'Donnell's property and that would be his northern most entrance. And then, we have the southern entrance that's much closer to the FP&L facility. Ron Coleman: Um, Ronald Coleman and I also live in Wyndemere. Regarding the same entrance, we see a problem, um, at the northern end of Livingston Road where people cut across and go in the reverse on those left turn lanes, so they can go — in — in this case they would be going south, uh — when you're leaving the, um, for instance, um, the shopping center where, um, Starbucks is and so forth. They would come back by the tire store and then they'll be watching. And so, then they'll sneak across in or what is a turn lane into the shopping center, but they'll do the reverse and then go south. Uh, that's a problem. Also, I'm sure everyone aware — is aware here that, people will go down Livingston at approximately 55 and 60 miles an hour. We witnessed that this afternoon. We were doing, you know, five miles over the speed limit, but these, a BMW and a Lexus went speeding by in — significantly faster. And, you can check with the, uh, Police Department, they'll verify that. Uh, I'm concerned about trucks cutting across at that entrance, uh, the proposed entrance there Page 3 of 10 Packet Pg. 1347 9.C.7 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 N I M across Livingston, because I think that that's going to be a real [inaudible] [00:07:22], and as Jean mentioned earlier, also in the morning, traffic going south on Livingston there is already backed up, uh, 15 minutes to try to get from — Jean Foster: — Sometimes. Ron Coleman: — you know, sometimes in season. To try to get from the, um, Wyndemere grounds traffic signal, down to the, uh, Golden Gate. And, if you have trucks going across there, it's not going to be manageable. Wayne Arnold: Thank you. Again, this is Wayne Arnold. The — The reason that Mr. O'Donnell likes the left end rather than having to use the main entrance gate at Grey Oaks is it's convenient directly into his site and it doesn't then have to use the gated access at Grey Oaks. But, having the signal there creates a gap for his trucks to make that turning movement so, when cars are stopped at the light you get a safe passage across and, Norm I don't know if you want to add anything else but, that's kind of the reason that it makes a very good break — natural break for the traffic flow. Al O'Donnell: Let me just — you can save a lot of money — Wayne Arnold: — S — S — Introduce yourself too. Al O'Donnell: Al O'Donnell. I can save a lot of money by not doing any of this, but, — Al O'Donnell: we thought that the Grey Oaks and the Wyndemere people would object strongly to us using the other intersection. — Jean Foster: — Well, that's correct, yes — Male Speaker: — Absolutely. Al O'Donnell: — So that's — that's we — we're making our own entry at significant expense and hassle — Ron Coleman: — Yeah. Jean Foster: Yeah. Al O'Donnell: — because we had to go through all this to change the entries and the DRI. Page 4 of 10 Packet Pg. 1348 9.C.7 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Ron Coleman: We're not arguing against you — Al O'Donnell: — NO. Ron Coleman: — we're just concerned about — about the speed and Al O'Donnell: — Hmm, hmm. Ron Coleman: — you know, the access it causes. Al O'Donnell: Right. Okay. Ron Coleman: So much for that. Wayne Arnold: Okay, thanks. Any other questions? Comments? Male Speaker: [Inaudible] [00:09:01]. Wayne Arnold: Yes sir. Let me get you the microphone. Mike Donaghue: Mike Donaghue with Grey Oaks. Uh, I agree with the, uh, people previously. Uh, the traffic is a major problem and a while back in the newspaper it talked about Naples, that everybody was 20 miles over the speed limit so, — [Laughter] Mike Donaghue: — uh, it just, sort of the, uh, article that was in the paper. That will be a major problem. Uh, I'm concerned about laden trucks, noise, no retailer's gonna be there I understand. It's gonna be a wholesale. There're gonna be lights on the property for nightlights. Wayne Arnold: Thank you for your questions. Well, the PUD and the DRI set up some landscape nurseries, and I think that at the — probably initially Mr. O'Donnell's gonna operate that as wholesale operation but it doesn't preclude there from being retails operations there at some point in the future. Mike Donaghue: It doesn't preclude it? Wayne Arnold: It does not preclude it. With regard to lighting, Al or John, I don't know if you can address that question. I don't know the answer to that if you need... Page 5 of 10 Packet Pg. 1349 9.C.7 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Al O'Donnell: We had envisioned possible — possibly some security lightings in some areas. Um, there's a huge berm between, you know, Grey Oaks and this property, it's, you know, 10 foot plus, plus plants on top. I mean, certainly if we do lighting it would, you know, attempt to, you know, direct it towards the river wide of it, not towards Grey Oaks. Wayne Arnold: I think too, just so it's clear, all of his property encumbered under the Florida Power and Light easement area, which means there are restrictions and you have to get approvals from Florida Power and Light. For instance, you can't put things that are taller than 14 feet under their powerline easement et cetera. So, — Male Speaker: No taller than 14 feet would be? Wayne Arnold: — Is that the planted material height or is that any high [inaudible] [00:11:00] — Male Speaker: — Everything. Wayne Arnold: Everything. Male Speaker: Yeah, the recent Condo was — Male Speaker: — No structures at all. Wayne Arnold: Right. No permanent structures permitted by FP&L there. Ron Coleman: One other question please. Uh, Ron Coleman again from Wyndemere. Would you define where you've got a, uh, area of weeds and grass and then you have a line of trees and then you have another area of weeds and grass and then you have Grey Oaks. What — what's planned with the line of trees there? Wayne Arnold: This is Wayne again. The existing vegetation that makes up the berm and landscape buffer that was planted by Grey Oaks will be untouched. It remains heavily — Wayne Arnold: — as Mr. O'Donnell mentioned, as a earth and berm and then it's got the — extensive mature vegetation on it. And, Mr. O'Donnell probably will be installing some more container plants in areas where The County in our, at least preliminary converstations have talked about if there were going to be storage areas or vehicles stored that they would look for landscape materials to be placed there, um, in addition to the landscape buffer that was already there. Al O'Donnell: Al O'Donnell again. I think what you're asking is about all the trees Page 6 of 10 Packet Pg. 1350 9.C.7 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM down the center. Ron Coleman: Yes, yes. Al O'Donnell: Well, it's absolutely illegal for me to have a big tree but, FP&L can do they want. — [Laugh] Al O'Donnell: — They have 50 foot trees in there, which, — Ron Coleman: — Do you plan on leaving [inaudible] [00:12:23] — Al O'Donnell: — you know, I would be shot for but, you know... Ron Coleman: Are those coming down or are you planning on leaving them? Al O'Donnell: Um, I think as I develop a bit more and more, uh, most of them will come down. I made though within a north half south half, so they get cut. Now, I will be required by The County to take away all the invasive — invasive exotics in that area. There's a lot of — like, over half of those plants are not ones that The County wants to see there. Um, one other caveat — there's not structures allowed there now. Their people have said to me, "Well in the future, when we all get solar in our houses, do you think we'll need three sets of powerlines?" So, — [Laugh] Al O'Donnell: — I — I hope that my grandkids will — will be able to get this property without powerlines [inaudible]. But, we'll see. [Laughter] Wayne Arnold: Thanks Al. Yes sir. Mike Donaghue: Mike Donaghue again. What are the days and hours of operation that we would see somebody on that property? Wayne Arnold: Al, do you want to take a shot at this one? Al O'Donnell: Sure, I'd love to. Um, historically my company works from seven in the morning to, you know, five, six, seven at night. Um, people get there in the 06:30 range occasionally. Um, people might get there a little earlier and just wait for things to start. Uh, we don't have night operations. I recently, for the first time in my life did a job on Page 7of10 Packet Pg. 1351 9.C.7 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM 41 — US 41 east and all of the work was required to be done at night so... Wayne Arnold: — I — I think it's — Al O'Donnell: In 30 years I did three night works, so... Ron Coleman: And days, if I may [Inaudible] [00:14:16] — Wayne Arnold: — My name is Wayne Arnold I just want to verify that there's an exception to the rule and, Al is subject to as growing plants that the whims of nature and freeze protection so there may be activities related to that. You know, — Al O'Donnell: — Hurricanes. Wayne Arnold: — preparations for hurricanes et cetera. So... Ron Coleman: Days of operation? Al O'Donnell: Um, my company works six days a week. We hardly ever work Sundays, but if — in, a place like this once the nursery was — was farther along and we had, you know, five, 10 acres of plants you would probably have one or two people stopping by to check the water on a Sunday where, if — not in the rainy season. Male Speaker: [Inaudible] Wayne Arnold: Yes sir. Michael Stoll: Michael Stoll, Grey Oaks. Uh, question. Uh, on the maintenance of material that is on the bluff currently is maintained by a combination of FPL, uh, on behalf [inaudible] closer to their powerlines, which are adjacent to the fence. And, then there's parts of that that we maintain. When I say "we" I mean Grey Oaks. Um, are we gonna have access to that area? Uh, is it gonna be a maintenance bluff. We're never gonna reach and access and, part two, where's the water gonna get — come from? Wayne Arnold: Thank you. Al, with the answer to the question about maintenance, I assume of their berm from your side. If they're currently using the FP&L easement for maintenance I'm assuming that you will allow that to continue. Al O'Donnell: Yeah. I — I I don't have any problem with — with maintaining an Page 8 of 10 Packet Pg. 1352 9.C.7 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM access — maintenance access and, you guys might want to get to — to my side of your fences from my property. Um, it's — there's gonna be keys on the locks of course. When I fence and — and block those roads, we'll have to have locks for [inaudible] FP&L and I have no problem with you guys also having any access along there. Wayne Arnold: Are you gonna answer the question about the water too? Michael Stoll: Where you're getting your water? Al O'Donnell: W — I [inaudible] to put wells down. They, um, I wanted to dig a lake but FP&L said no. Um, so, um, maybe John can speak from an engineering point. Uh, the only place we could get water — we're planning to have at least two wells. Male Speaker: Is that...? Male Speaker: [Inaudible]. Wayne Arnold: Thank you. Yes ma'am. Jean Foster: Jean Foster. Uh, one question. Uh, I was kind of surprised by this multi -use path that The County is asking to set aside to get some land for. When is that gonna be building? What if — where do the plans — does it go? How far north does it go? Where does it go? [Laugh] Wayne Arnold: This is Wayne. I — I wish we had an answer for you but The County doesn't have the money to construct it. That's why they're asking Mr. O'Donnell to provide an easement for it so when they decide to go ahead and move forward on construction of it, they could do that within, uh, — an easement across his property. It's my understanding that this plan, uh, would link all the way into Lee County up to, um, Livingston Road and to the Imperial Parkway area in Lee County. It's on a long range transportation pathway plan. But, I don't believe there's any timeframe or monies dedicated to it. Jean Foster: So who — so, who owns the p — it — it's on your — it — it's on his property. Wayne Arnold: Correct. Jean Foster: Okay. Oh, interesting. [Laugh] Wayne Arnold: So, The County — Page 9of10 Packet Pg. 1353 9.C.7 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Jean Foster: — Kind of like a rental lease. Wayne Arnold: — The County is — well The County is asking for there to be that easement so they could construct it when necessary. So, Al would be cooperating with them regarding the location on his property. The County has some other easements and hopefully we can comingle their easements over his property. Male Speaker: Um, Wayne. Wayne Arnold: You don't want to? Norm Trebilcock: Uh, Norm Trebi — Trebilcock for the record. Just to, uh, maybe in answer to that. The Honda dealership that was recently developed right there at Pine Ridge in Livingston, there — there was a sidewalk against, um, Livingston Road there, and they ended up widening that sidewalk to — to 10 foot width — Norm Trebilcock: — and, that kinda took care of that pathway aspect of things, so, they're trying to give access to folks who kinda go heading north and south, so... Wayne Arnold: Thank you, Norm. Norm Trebilcock: Mm-hmm. Wayne Arnold: Anybody else? Questions, comments? Everybody wanna go home? Female Speaker: Cocktail. Wayne Arnold: [Laughs] Well, if there are no other questions, I'm, uh, go ahead and adjourn the meeting. Thanks everybody for coming out. Male Speaker: Thanks. Female Speaker: Thank you, Wayne. [End of Audio] Duration: 19 minutes Page 10 of 10 Packet Pg. 1354 9.C.7 Grey Oaks DRI/PUD June 25, 2018 Neighborhood Information Meeting .Q a a LL C E E GradyMi a Packet Pg. 1355 9.C.7 2� Project Team 0 • Albert O'Donnell — O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. N ti r • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner — Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. o r O • John C. English, P.E., Engineer — Barron Collier Companies, Peninsula Engineering M O Q Q a LL U E Grady a Packet Pg. 1356 9.C.7 Project Information V) 0 Existing Zoning: Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposed DRI/PUD amendment Request: Modify Master Plan to relocate two M previously approved, but 0 unimproved, project access points from Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, to Livingston Road. a LL E C E a r E Grady a Packet Pg. 1357 Overall DRI/PUD R NO R7 H 9.C.7 0 (,rad,, Packet Pg. 1358 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1359 Proposed Map H j$G8t7D � ® ivamnrsnc CENEEAL NOSES .1 Ynww remmvmm. s6.s ,� fA oav cowee ureamean .v° .re. � �® resmmnn vaa�s. nn .emm E wa vvx�aooas� el �a+ec�r m �ci P°9iim/�Tinuna VP mmaarn nm9'•W� seaYmx � navmnw6 YaY �mucaa EuD !/! °.rsca/6ua co.omcut � !/! to�smenaysm¢ q® rcsg'm''njgR� nVa4RaNT sas Ya xom®aYi ac4sxe>< s° Q 9! reauno Irnm�rauox amav3 0 . Rm asp ®1 rase Fjy om wire mm� aims a!!➢ 81a�nDx —► maex . aro mow ." =► aem ®®mt aor u.n�nme aooxo anx {a chs oror * secor o.�ovae LEGEN4 Mw icou..a rnmrmslss. COQ""' As6s ..m x aaim � i°vmi <ro;/ws� or -ns re . wa uu�u� s� ui cursavanon �w .ar�aor �:� ma. �� aiwk rwi��_�waY 9l.GSL 4a0a baa. 16 9046 IOY.Ioa cansm°xnox BUFMT.4 9a8.laa =ay .eol.aa6 9W'6lt[pn YlOSPl1[9N 81V6m a�unvus oawe�savca i.wre �wsrPaPcu, aay.°e •.G ew+uuncWay.�s. Com'_. _� a �) a�n li M071TH 9.C.7 E � 0 0 ,L V N C14 N O O O O N J a rn M O m U .Q Q a LL C a> E t v R a a+ Grady a Packet Pg. 1360 Access Exhibit 9.C.7 0 U .Q Q a LL C E a r E Grady a Packet Pg. 1361 Proposed Access Locations Northern Access: Proposed right-in/right-out from the south bound lane of Livingston Road and a left -in from the north bound lane of Livingston Road Southern Access: right-in/right-out from the south bound lane of Livingston Road and no left -in from the north bound lane of Livingston Road k 9.C.7 C� 0 Gra(],, U) 0 'L^ V B rt+ 2 N rn N 0 0 0 0 N J a M 0 r ca .Q CL a c as �a a r c m M U ca Q Packet Pg. 1362 9.C.7 q� C - Ordinance 2007-40, Section 4.02.A.6 Y 0 4,02 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES � No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered cr used, or land cw water used, in whole or in park for other than the following; N A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures = rn N 1) G courses) 2) Tennis Club and facilities 0 o 3) Water management facilities; essential services (in accordance with the o N LDC-). Lakes. intruding lakes with seawall and other types of architectural -J hank treatment. d A Open space recreational activities, community Pu P ty parks, and similar uses, rn o � including but not limited to shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, swimming pools, boat docks and ramp. canoe launches, fishing piers. boat storage, beach gazebos, omcession stands, health trails. bike paths and nature trails. O observation pletForms, boardwalks. playground, picnic areas and other types of facilities intended for outdoor recreation, 2 5) Community centerfclubhousa{s). 5) a- CL Q 6) Storage, maintenance yards, and landscaping nurseries within FP&I .. easements. rights-cf-way, and open space, Subject to approver of the y persons or entities in whose favor the easement or right-of-way runs. E 7) Project Information and Sales Center. t 9) Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and Q which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Glty Community Development Director determines to be compatlble in the distrtt. � t U Packet Pg. 1363 Questions? 9.C.7 c 10 o Packet Pg. 1364 SIGN POSTING INSIRIUCTIO SS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearin_ Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E, 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered_ If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, TMS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER_ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER 3800 Via Del Rey OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician for Q. Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 10" day of August 2018, by Sharon Umpenhour, personally known to me and who dRYdid not take an oath. 1hRY Pp � , • ;�. TIFFANY E * * MY COMMISSION AEXPIRES: March 1, 2020 + � ocj°� BONOThru Budget Nolary Soes My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 Tiffany Bray Printed Name of Notary Public 9.C.7 Packet Pg. 1365 PUBLIC NEARING REQUESTING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT AMENDMENTIDRIj APPROVAL PETITIONIP: PL23170001548 GREY OAKS MINED USE PLANNED UWT DEVELOPMENT IMPUDI AND P00I24001729 HALSTATT/GREY OAKS OEVEEOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT MOD HEARS BV PHE cauirB rovxrr maxmxn cn.nrrxanx ccvn axn BnaBn nr cnnury cnnr.rcunurB.e iurc ;PISOH000l041 Aro Pu91PooM If- CCPC DATE: SEPT. 8th, 2019 • 9:00 AH CONTACT: NANCY GUNDLACH. AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER BCC DATE OCT 231e. 2019 9:00 AN PHONE: (239) W-2484 NANCY.GUNOLAC14COLLIER000NTTFL.GOV THE AWVE TO BE HELD IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY CONNIS9IDNEBS' CHAMBERS, THIRD FLOOR. COLLIER COUNTY GOVEANMEHT CENTER, 3299 TAMIAIA; TRAIL EAST, NAPLES. FLgRIDA 34112 i 08/10/2018 9.C.7 Paqe 1 Packet Pg. 1366 9.C.7 i n N Y M 0 d 0,L^ r T) 2 N I- T - CD O O O ti r O N J IL O Cl) O C O r R V Q Q Q LL C O E t V R Q r C d t V r w a C kthd& 'mak pugL1C .,SARING AMENDMENT AND QEVELOPIMENT DEVELOPMENT �P1JD} APPFtXpVA4 pp REGIDNAL IMPAG7 AMENDMENT(D"0 PETVTIBfl N'. PLTM11700015A8 G0.EY DAMS M.%EO OSE PLANNED ""' DEVELOPMENT INIPOOI AND SsiOx i[[Py Rx0 eonn0 of [oelxlY LD UUI55ioNFnb IeCLYfIMRIIAI XXMII kRP 1111nfM PLT017lA817FL NALSTATT/GREY WS DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IINPACT 19X11 xF+.Rn a. in es SxUlNx [o S1PF[! � L7vNA [!p•' R[IlM. IUNIIk elLRsiC k illi. IUiIiY 1i19 xlk-1i4� NRn 01 PFI YR[I9N1[ Uil IN 1gIiIlAI m IrRlgli tl fR'1't OMn unN' IUia W cx¢i il•[ NIINt :1InKLtAN Idl All 11[F1! iar m'x al[I, n INI Ik IlFYIiM ll [1Y.NWIUII IIAROkb Itl HF MySttmNN+Isis IFYt1PRx1 d AUxoNnh n.rYU[yiq[yll'fNIUf[PRin 9UA lA pxell[{1YUI[A IIMmU110kl1 UYIYi 1p[IS IIN[OIS IWR X11011 inR , Ip rt I[npAx XX Irxnlx 1xl MI s IUfel[p sYfAONi NlRMII N PNI ikVS[eINiS101[M k- . � UC<NIA INLWiPNCnk fuo lu[xrnn+exan Nurs:uomu Ax W [II wll INlln'1 Y[!u=[UII]IS kY In11RiNYi1M NI K:FiS AKI10'N .Nes n n[ a! iRIRIIPW 16 nil IAsfl0.11'KnmHRUyilf'1A IWWmRR IUI[UU[['I nX1n I- o[W.111YFn IItFe e[Yvs �x�lU yU, MA4�Yr�nF1Ni5'.• bSfFAiNRIMUI 1k911i IAkSxR1x m 0 ry, [Np4i a fq Sf{PI tPx P[NW iMi N IP Mi ei1AlRtlf [IM IS A Y'Xlk'inllYfiC1 xntNn [ 11us Rr y51xiINN, 1fllMltlllf IMUf[N ail flN+[ilAAi2 tfiJil, rYl[YR [R1�1SfIP0iM1R Of IYF U1FR31[i CCpCAIE I;EPT AVCP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER CCPC NAYS SEPT fllh, lP18 980 AN THOK 12 $1 25224S1LNANCY GUNXk0KjCOIIIERCOUNTVTL GOV PCC DATEOCT U'd 2018 • 400 AN THE AB ENT CE1 HELD IN ME oo RTCAA L EAIT.Op Q�UNTAAP EB.�WANE CHAMBERS_ TRYAO FLOOR COWER COUNTY .10W A 9.C.7 Paqe 3 Packet Pg. 1368 9.D 09/06/2018 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.1) Item Summary: PL20170001548: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance No. 07-40, the Grey Oaks MPUD, by relocating unbuilt access locations on Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to Livingston Road for access only to the areas of the PUD identified as FP&L easement located south of Grey Oaks Drive East, and by providing an effective date. The subject MPUD consisting of 1,601+/- acres is located at the northeast, northwest, and southeast quadrants of the intersection of Airport Road (S.R. 31) and Golden Gate Parkway (C.R. 886), in Sections 24, 25, and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion to Agenda item PL20170001729-Halstatt/Grey Oaks DRI) [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 09/06/2018 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal — Zoning Name: Nancy Gundlach 08/17/2018 1:52 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning — Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 08/17/2018 1:52 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Zoning Zoning Michael Bosi Review Item Ray Bellows Review Item Camden Smith Review Item Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Judy Puig Review item Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Growth Management Department Planning Commission James C French Review Item Mark Strain Meeting Pending Completed 08/17/2018 4:06 PM Completed 08/20/2018 11:38 AM Completed 08/20/2018 11:38 AM Completed 08/20/2018 4:52 PM Review Item Completed Completed 08/22/2018 4:29 PM 09/06/2018 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 1369 Co -ger County ..O 1%0^ STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2018 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) (COMPANION TO DOA-PL20170001729, GREY OAKS DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI)) PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT AND AGENTS: Owner*/Applicant: Albert O'Donnell O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. 4291 Williams Road Estero, FL 33928 *Approximately 1,046 parcels within the PUD have been sold to others. Agent: D. Wayne Arnold Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), consider amending Ordinance No. 07-40, the Grey Oaks Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD), by relocating unbuilt access locations on Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to Livingston Road for access only to the areas of the PUD identified as FP&L easement located south of Grey Oaks Drive East, and by providing an effective date. PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 9.D.1 Page 1 of 13 Packet Pg. 1370 9.D.1 lam � � 9�l �11�MIND■■�■ PON Lain =16 0"Ml == 1� � A=MEN •. EWWWsi_i him blorl {_IN�•r: 7 r u+6 PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 ,3b we 61LA"3 l8 q1►'9 dA113 16 Q J a [0 #D d h�b.L�BNlhfl � N QV wnvnd it u+6 PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 IL Y L 0 0 0 0 N a 0 m O .N N� I.I Q 00 r O N 00 IL cC O L w 0 CL w w LL LL Q t— r c m E t V Q Page 2 of 13 Packet Pg. 1371 ,3b we 61LA"3 [0 #D ',}wn ild Ida 12a2-0 L) O J IL Y L 0 0 0 0 N a 0 m O .N N� I.I Q 00 r O N 00 IL cC O L w 0 CL w w LL LL Q t— r c m E t V Q Page 2 of 13 Packet Pg. 1371 '— vows m aWVM sa-WM IdW mex&w HW dVri - Wid HEI1SM ❑nd 1111!1 r ON AIDU PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 mi 9.D.1 Page 3 of 13 Packet Pg. 1372 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject MPUD consisting of 1,601.39± acres is located at the northeast, northwest, and southeast quadrants of the intersection of Airport Road (S.R. 31) and Golden Gate Parkway (C.R. 886), in Sections 24, 25, and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Please, see the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) was originally approved in Ordinance Number 75-34 on August 19, 1975. There have been several subsequent ordinances which have been repealed: Ordinance Numbers 90-48, 96-82, 97-45, 98-94 and 00-46. The current ordinance is Ordinance Number 07-40 approved by the Board on April 24, 2007. The PUD is currently approved for 1,775 dwelling units, 1,303,091 square feet of commercial and office and four golf courses. The Grey Oaks MPUD is mostly developed with residences, a golf course, and a clubhouse. There is an FPL easement located along the entire eastern boundary of the PUD. The petitioner is proposing to modify the Master Plan, Map H-1, attached to Ordinance 2007-40 to shift two previously approved, but unimproved project access points, from Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road to Livingston Road. These two project access points shown on Map H have never been constructed; they were intended to serve as general access points to the Grey Oaks community. The two access points proposed to be shifted to Livingston Road are not intended for general access to the Grey Oaks community, but rather are intended for the sole use of a 32± acre landscape nursery located under a Florida Power and Light (FPL) easement. Please see attached Exhibit C - Aerials. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING (related to the proposed plant nursery): North: Golf course maintenance facility and undeveloped land and then Grey Oaks Drive East, an ingress/egress point into the Grey Oaks PUD within an FPL easement with a zoning designation of Grey Oaks MPUD. East: Residential development with a zoning designation of Wyndemere PUD and Estates (E). South: FPL substation within an FPL easement with a zoning designation of Rural Agriculture (A). West: Developed residential uses with a zoning designation of Grey Oaks MPUD. PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 9.D.1 Page 4 of 13 Packet Pg. 1373 9.D.1 AERIAL PHOTO GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Amendment and has found it consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. See attached Exhibit B - FLUE Consistency Review. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR's). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current A UIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 Page 5 of 13 Packet Pg. 1374 as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard (LOS) within the five year A UIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and C. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " The proposed PUD Amendment on the subject property was reviewed based on the applicable 2017 AUIR Inventory Report. The Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) submitted in the application indicates that the proposed landscape nursery development will generate approximately 463 PM peak hour two-way trips, which according to the TIS, represents the same number of PM peak hour two-way trips remaining for retail use allowed by the existing PUD. The proposed development will impact the following roadway segments with the listed capacities: Roadway Link 2017 Current Peak 2017 AUIR AUIR Hour Peak Remaining Existing Direction Service Capacity LOS Volume/Peak Direction Livingston Pine Ridge B 3,100/North 1,596 Road Road to Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Golden Gate B 3,000/North 1,691 Road Parkway to Radio Road Golden Gate Airport -Pulling C 3,300/East 1,100 Parkway Road to Livingston Road Golden Gate Livingston D 3,300/East 529 Parkway Road to I-75 PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 Page 6 of 13 Packet Pg. 1375 Based on the 2017 AUIR, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed trips for the amended project within the 5 -year planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (Site Development Plan (SDP) or Plans and Plat (PPL)). GMP Conclusion: The proposed PUD Amendment may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board of Collier County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analysis: Environmental Review: The proposed changes do not affect any of the environmental requirements of the GMP or LDC. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Utility Review: Utility Review staff has reviewed the petition and has found no impact on public utilities. Zoning and Land Development Review: The Grey Oaks MPUD is mostly developed with single and multi -family residences, an adult living facility, golf courses and a clubhouse. There is an FPL easement located along the entire eastern boundary of the PUD. As previously stated, the purpose of the proposed amendment is to relocate two unconstructed access points along Airport Road, and Golden Gate Parkway intended to serve the Grey Oaks community. They will be relocated to two new access points along Livingston Road and will provide sole access to a 32 -acre plant nursery located under an FPL easement. The Master Plan has been updated to reflect the proposed changes. REZONE FINDINGS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 9.D.1 Page 7 of 13 Packet Pg. 1376 "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analysis: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning staff has indicated that the proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with all applicable elements of the FLUE of the GMP. See Attachment B - Flue Consistency Review. 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as residential, golf course, essential service, and commercial lands. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. At the time the subject property was rezoned to a PUD, it was deemed to be of sufficient size and did not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed PUD Amendment does not change this finding. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to reallocate two undeveloped access points from Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to Livingston Road. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with the County's land use policies upon adoption that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 9.D.1 Page 8 of 13 Packet Pg. 1377 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUD Amendment will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed PUD Amendment will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas inside or outside the PUD. Furthermore, the PUD Document provides adequate property development regulations to ensure light and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas. The Master Plan further demonstrates that the locations of proposed preserve and open space areas should further ensure light and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Staff is of the opinion this PUD Amendment will not adversely impact property values. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties around the Grey Oaks PUD are mostly developed. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that their sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The development complies with the GMP, which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed amendment does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 9.D.1 Page 9 of 13 Packet Pg. 1378 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing zoning designations. However, the petitioner is seeking this PUD Amendment to relocate two previously approved access points from Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road to Livingston Road in compliance with LDC provisions. The proposed amendment meets the intent of the PUD district. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD Amendment is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or County. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by County staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff has concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments so that the impacts of the Level of Service will be minimized. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 9.D.1 Page 10 of 13 Packet Pg. 1379 PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria." 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The Grey Oaks PUD is an established project which has been developed primarily with residential, golf course, park preserve, and office uses. The subject site fronts on Livingston Road. Water distribution and wastewater collection/transmission mains are readily available within these rights- of-way, and there is adequate water and wastewater treatment capacity to serve the proposed PUD. The project would also be required to comply with County regulations regarding drainage and other utilities. Therefore, the site is suitable for the proposed development. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control of the property located under an FPL easement south of Grey Oaks Drive East. Additionally, the development will be required to gain PPL and SDP approval. These processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The currently approved development, landscaping, and buffering standards were determined to be compatible with the adjacent uses and with the use mixture within the project itself at the time the PUD was approved. Staff has concluded that this amendment will not change the project's compatibility, both internally and externally. PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 9.D.1 Page 11 of 13 Packet Pg. 1380 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or PPL), at which time, a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including Collier County Water -Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. Furthermore, adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. The petitioner is not seeking any deviations. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on June 25, 2018, at Naples Church of Christ, 12760 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida. Approximately eight residents attended the meeting along with the Agent's team and Applicant. The residents and Agent/Applicant discussed traffic patterns on Livingston Road, lighting within the proposed landscape nursery, and hours and days of operation. For further information, see attached Exhibit D - Transcript of Neighborhood Information Meeting. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on August 10, 2018 RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDA- PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD), to the BCC with a recommendation of approval. PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 9.D.1 Page 12 of 13 Packet Pg. 1381 Attachments: Attachment A: Proposed PUD Ordinance Attachment B: FLUE Consistency Review Attachment C: Aerials Depicting Removed and Relocated Access Points Attachment D: Transcript of the Neighborhood Information Meeting Attachment E: Letter of Support Attachment F: Application PUDA-PL20170001548, GREY OAKS PUD August 20, 2018 9.D.1 Page 13 of 13 Packet Pg. 1382 ORDINANCE NO. 18 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 07-40, THE GREY OAKS MPUD, BY RELOCATING UNBUILT ACCESS LOCATIONS ON AIRPORT ROAD AND GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY TO LIVINGSTON ROAD FOR ACCESS ONLY TO THE AREAS OF THE PUD IDENTIFIED AS FP&L EASEMENT LOCATED SOUTH OF GREY OAKS DRIVE EAST, AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT MPUD CONSISTING OF 1,601+/- ACRES IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST, NORTHWEST, AND SOUTHEAST QUADRANTS OF THE INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT ROAD (S.R. 31) AND GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (C.R. 886), IN SECTIONS 24, 25, AND 26, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20170001548] WHEREAS, on April 24, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 07-40, which established the Grey Oaks Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD); and WHEREAS, Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., representing O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend Ordinance No. 07-40, the Grey Oaks MPUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO MASTER PLAN. The Master Plan, attached as Exhibit "H-1" to Ordinance No. 07-40, is hereby amended and replaced with the Master Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "H-1" and incorporated herein by reference. [17 -CPS -01724/1424334/1]35 Grey Oaks PUDA-PL20170001548 Words stmeak thfough are deleted; words underlined are added. 7/18/18 Page ] of 2 9.D.2 Packet Pg. 1383 SECTION TWO: SECTION TWO: AMENDMENT TO SECTION 2.10 OF THE PUD DOCUMENT Section 2.10 of the PUD document attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 07-40 is hereby amended to add the following language: The owner of the property encumbered by the FPL easement will maintain the 2 new access locations on Livingston Road which service the use on said property. The subject property is south of the Grey Oaks Drive East entrance road. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, INTERIM CLERK Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko'� Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit H-1 - Master Plan day of , 2018. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA It ANDY SOLIS, Chairman [17 -CPS -01724/1424334/1]35 Grey Oaks PUDA-PL20170001548 Words stmok fiwough are deleted; words underlined are added. 7/18/18 Page 2 of 2 9.D.2 Packet Pg. 1384 LEGE GENERAL NOTES °w". ( ® RR4mEKriN. 1) WNTLAND PUSS&TION AAL" ARM 0GOIP COT RHH APPROMIATE AND TIM ISE RHPOM DOSING T3H PE83DTTING PHOCIM. (.0GOLF CCURSR AtaW7ENANCS YACRATY x) AMdCREAOEH ARE APPRDI7YATE AYO f,300 CO Ulm C-alOHou"SOeraet TO CHANGY AND/OR VARLITIO V. p/7 ztiCMMCY i XCAI4lP g=", ,THE DYYRWM MAY RRACATE Ott9 OM"/MAIt COY3®CIAL OP TO 2% WUL71 YAUZY UNIY9 C01G6RCTAL/HOrA. Ya v TM NOST nv QNADRAAT T'0 THH NOR78BASF QDADRART RO ® CANAL LONG AS THE TlYTAL NUWED OF ® L XAKX RUNWAL ONM IN am HAYS (•:'.'� tV WMA" (CONSERVATION ARRAS) DO$ NOT EYCKM 1776 UNM, PARE iW 444 uauswrON 111TH TURN lANL4 AND SIGNAMATION a IM&T IN AND MOST OOT (�11 1+ MOST W AND MORT OUT IILfII ANO SOUTU 130MM TEFF �+ RIMINTTAL ACCM ONLY p8o Ay SSCU13M GAEH009H CIIISR WuL� T rtID bW.�FFi" eOmnAtu AR xORTHlsat ANnso47HH4..'��OU 6 Avrn (R 91t� CODNfYI UN=/s,➢. A= ocx aew¢ -EMUMU qUNM y.r. 9IE.66t OPT;CB/RETAIL COiO�SCtAE. 1.205,091 O.OLU 70.104 GOLF Co4ffiS/RYCREATTON ART/trC87-OF-X6Y 64 HOLL9 8EA.91t LASE .& YASII 226114 4SAAa1 CONSMATTON � �6-4 LONOta SIIRTOSAL 1247.604 xoR^HXesi- aeAnHnCT (em of rr.vr:st 14.{0 18 ,��y.�,Mi ON27'8 100.71& QYMCR/itEraS COIOLl4tCLt 100.000 HOLESHOLTiSJ. & G04t COIIR3EJRE(REATTON GHT-07-XAY 107.10! Iti1CadN CON k AMN YANA 66344.41 Y�IItlAt2 CONSHiQ11TON 9ua OTAL 965.84& TOTAL 1801.394 ibTu !'OaILLfRA OaFXA® 9lRGA�rtLI.f �1<� t� PDD.tlANA tic n i 6 y'.:._ AOlR1'(GU17�AL 190 YY(p" aa�atat,/ aaw (lid eiAAHZW9 (IRO} a N 8 ft O �► 'll �+ aA > a Lo cEcE $6$�Yj�ppj [ T�+ Q Q Q r Q N FPu EA961ar J a taco 4126 PAaEYar Q U Lto errA eRrNa R na PpIDOat6tt ec1 1 Q nPu z Q Q � NAM 7RGETAT40N PRYSffiVESQA7A � Offfi191 Q 26S NAUM v � J � TOTAL NATON NATT" VEGETATION a- Co VYCSLARON TEOTTAIION 9AVim R MM W �o 651.9{ A.C. t0V.99 A.C. 137.90 A.C. 4 nS4iME3 069 PClif$ SavEO iry EA3fEftN MOST PM.C¢. O a so.�mwr rnuorwvT. AOlR1'(GU17�AL 190 YY(p" aa�atat,/ aaw (lid eiAAHZW9 (IRO} Q Packet Pg. 1385 a N 8 ft O �► 'll �+ aA > a Lo cEcE $6$�Yj�ppj [ T�+ Q Q Q r Q N J a Q U Lto 1 Q z Q Q � Q Z v � J � � a- Co c MM W �o O O a 0 om 0 a Q Revised by: _ 0. Grady Minor & c _ Assoclates, P.A- 0312112018 4C a-aNiP 193 RX 15E bf: 4.1 Q D.. * aam M aq/1Tl1 1ipM1 AY OM: -"Ts NT.TsS. %k IgFt>-fGS-0CY I. NORTH 1 a 1 M y.+ Q Packet Pg. 1385 LEGE 00 RWMM4= 1) 11l1T1.AND PVATION AREAS ABH GOLF Coum W GOLF COUM X&INTRUNCE TAC= wL) GOLF COURIm CLUBEEOuss old/ftW MURMCY MxDIcw./Fm SUE3=r TO CHANGE ANTI/OR VARTATTON. f 1 ►2sl. : i t TH I DXVRLOPIM MAY FUMOCATZ PUD CANAL IIP TO M MUM -FAMILY UNIT'S Y FROM THE NORTiTlf88T QUADRANT WXTU" (CONSERVATION AREA TO TH$ NOSTHRAST QUADRANT 80 PARK LONG A9 TAE TOTAL NUMIM OF WTEL�WCTIOX WTMTURN LANIS R1SDENTIAL UNM IN ORTY OAS.4 AND SIONALIZATION DOSS NOT KLC'ESD 1775 UNMI MOST : i i RIGHT f FTOHT IN AND M011T OUT AND NoRm ;i i LEFT ENLARGED MEML 1) 11l1T1.AND PVATION AREAS ABH 1 APPROUMATE AND VUL BX RHPEI•+"XD DURING THE Fl R3ffrmG FROGEW. 2) ALL ACREAQRS ARS APFE'tiiXXATZ AND SUE3=r TO CHANGE ANTI/OR VARTATTON. t TH I DXVRLOPIM MAY FUMOCATZ PUD IIP TO M MUM -FAMILY UNIT'S FROM THE NORTiTlf88T QUADRANT TO TH$ NOSTHRAST QUADRANT 80 LONG A9 TAE TOTAL NUMIM OF R1SDENTIAL UNM IN ORTY OAS.4 DOSS NOT KLC'ESD 1775 UNMI t :yY:t-, `i ,tt ,t Ir,r;a, `� ��: ► ►a: i thtiv� i • ' «: 1 CGKWKR= X. 3' MANWILOWT t '*: t SUBT D ► :iY:1.i��7# +. i . t ; . aY� #fYY t ' a it ` 1 CC + t••. t t 1p m STAMP PDTAL POI NCIAKA 0011 coum (00 1911 1TNM 1,203.021 SY.01.A. 54 HOLES 4C# UNM 100.080 S.F.G." 18 SOLR9 t ; t♦ i• ^m r a Ja• i00.71t ld,.4Oi 107.40} POC;11 SA 70.041 VnLA= Rx 55.94.8 =.841 COAM Mugs 1501.391 rAmm mmw(m) LEGEND GREY OAKS © GradyMinor 0 f%radyMmxrDnd"1'10viaON W., REVISED N.S. °B �D� R-11. 6p.aga. Finrida 34134 C ¢ 06/14/2018 °"M: Um MiD Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Architects chiteres PUD MASTER PLAN — MAP H-1 E NAPE, - '—.f.iuN. E80005151 f art. of ADN. LB 0005151 BUSIIH�x LG 200002x6 MpGpS[p xwx2piA Bonin springs: 239947.1149 x x.f. raOy47innr. rnm Fort Myers: 239.6190.4380 SHEET I OF 4 Packet Pg. 1386 L -N LARGL-b 9.D.2 1%51- C FE . REVISED /LI . i06/14/2018®s Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors Planners . Landscape Architects PUD MASTER PLAN MAP H-1 Bonit. SpOngs: 239.947.1144 Fort klyem: 239,690 4380 Packet Pg. 1387 TWAL STAMP 26% TOTAL KATIME �XkTtPE�.. COU= "M PAWAX PAY a . r 09144 A.ii4 Lof.wv E.4. �k ASSUMES 0-89 ACRES SAVED IN EASTERN MOST PARCEL. SOUTHEAST QUADRANT. lsos.39k LEGEND .,+1, A,I++I,r +,a Aland Fd no © GradyMinor ;II111I1 Ya llcl lies ROOIIa 9pi"g, Fl -J.+ 34134 Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Landscape Archilects cert. of AUN. EB 0005151 1— or AutJt. Le 0005151 B-1,— LG 16000261; BofflU Spri igs: 239 947 1144 u u 6. r;r arlr9/innr. rnnr Fon. Aly—: 239.690.4380 WAUM Y'AST SUM L p iI C0 t^ 6 tL3 00 4 .. ul) r ILL 'I O t J O V- n r `r tJ/ J , Jr J O CD t f/ Y`J ( I t J Jit JJi fFJ/♦ r ,FJ / t ! r �r/ J JiIi i % IJ Jt �rtJ♦//n JJr♦f t N err/t/'�JF`JJ rt/tJ J`�/♦/t/trr®(7t� �f/f Jf i r�J/ltJ� tr/rAJitrJ♦J ri �/r /rY`t!�t Jtf rrt /, d t t / J♦ r r � r it I r iJJ ♦ /It � Jt`J♦t � JJ J � .. J, ♦r J f / J / r r f/ fit JJ Jt f f �� O / r ,J t♦rt /JJ f rrJr r rrJ,r"/ J /fi r /' J t �� ♦tI/V(f V! tJt It/t/' / J l / /JJ 00 //�` C r L.i % /r/JJ t`t ' tt J/� Jr! t `J 'rtt t t /t♦�JJ JtJ trr rrt J co J �a "aIv V romoctum {p� L O a E � 00% VM 87�PL'�S �j 0 O O a. r+ O N c E u NAM Q N.T.S. 6LAIE-. m GREY OAKS PUD MASTER PLAN — MAP H-1 REVISED 06/14/2018 !]LE UNANE 9 - }r ��Eo NAo zo,e Q SHEET 3 OF 4 Packet Pg. 1388 a rLaw" POT= If • � �� MM � �MrIUMM. ..�', :A�+11 �r.11� O �• M 4�. IN "Ah � L y _ a 1 LEGEND © GradyMinor Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Cert. of A.N. EB 0005151 Un. of A— LB 0005151 Bonim springs: 239.947.1144 . w.. 6-dyllinar. cnm COLM "Tv �rtt�rann {gvD1 Q. Grady 111aor a.,d As—ivW P.A. 381111 Vla Ucl Kcy IWotta gpd"p. Florida 34134 Landscape Architects Buil — Lf. 20000280 Fon. Flyers: 239.890.4380 NORTH GREY OAKS PUD MASTER PLAN — MAP H-1 9.D.2 N N.T.S. REVISED 06/14/2018 0AM pa 11 na tLIYE' - ++ asocosm wa „ mis 5 Q SHEET 4 OF 4 Packet Pg. 1389 SM *-"TMP 495 RCE 25E Da kned ' Om" bsa ti81i"l atedla o Q Data: o Sri ftt J mf, n-nataa-�a2-i CL 1 1 cc w w EjQ D < CL. Revised by: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 06114(2018 9.D.2 N N.T.S. REVISED 06/14/2018 0AM pa 11 na tLIYE' - ++ asocosm wa „ mis 5 Q SHEET 4 OF 4 Packet Pg. 1389 SM *-"TMP 495 RCE 25E Da kned bC Om" bsa ti81i"l atedla tr Data: MWL 2047 Sri ftt N0133-Oai mf, n-nataa-�a2-i shmt 1 1 9.D.2 N N.T.S. REVISED 06/14/2018 0AM pa 11 na tLIYE' - ++ asocosm wa „ mis 5 Q SHEET 4 OF 4 Packet Pg. 1389 <7,o&er 4Z::Q141-IL Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA # 1244, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: July 10, 2018 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review APPLICATION NUMBER: PUDA-20170001548 Review 3 APPLICATION NAME: Grey Oaks Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Amendment REQUEST: To amend Grey Oaks MPUD, approved via Ordinance #07-40, to modify the Master Plan Exhibit `H- 1' to shift two previously approved access points for Grey Oaks (one shown on Airport -Pulling Road and the other shown on Golden Gate Parkway to two access points on Livingston Road). These two access points are not intended to serve as access points to the Grey Oaks community, but rather for the sole use by the owner (O'Donnell Landscaping) of approximately 32 acres adjacent to Livingston Road. This portion of the Grey Oaks MPUD is encumbered by a Florida Power and Light (FPL) easement. The second petition submission included additional minor changes to the PUD Master Plan to add street names and show a 12' wide easement adjacent to Livingston Road right-of-way for a future pathway; revisions to TIS; and a letter of `no objection' from the president of the HOA. The third submittal revises the PUD Master Plan Map H-1 to be more legible; and revises the Grey Oaks MPUD Ordinance "List of Maps and Tables" to include F-1 Future Pathway Easement Exhibit and add #14 to Section 7.05 Transportation. Submittal 3 includes an email letter of `no objection' from Grey Oaks General Manager for this revised access request. LOCATION: The ±1,601.39 -acres Grey Oaks PUD property is located in the northeast, southeast, and northwest quadrants of Airport -Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway, in Sections 24, 25 and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. The northwest quadrant consisting of 354 acres is within the City of Naples. The northeast and southeast quadrants, consisting of 1,247 acres (including the 32 acres adjacent to Livingston Road), are located in unincorporated Collier County. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property, containing approximately ±1,601 acres, is partially designated Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, partially designated Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict #8, and partially designated Incorporated Areas (City of Naples), as depicted on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. According to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), the Urban designation areas will accommodate a variety of residential and non- residential uses, including recreational uses (such as golf courses). Section 2.05 Permitted Variations of Dwelling Units in Ordinance #07-40 stated, "All properties designated for residential uses may be developed at the maximum number of dwelling units allocated, provided that the total 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104, 239-252-2400 Page - 1 - of 2 9.D.3 Packet Pg. 1390 9.D.3 number of dwelling units shall not exceed 1,775. Table 1: Development Parcel Program identifies the maximum units by project quadrant." This equates to a density of approximately 1.11 dwelling units per gross acre (1,775 dwelling units /1,601.39 acres = 1.108 DU/A). The MPUD is eligible for 5 DU/A (base of 4 DU/A plus 1 DU/A for direct access to two or more arterial or collector roads). Since this PUDA does not increase or decrease the number of total acres or the number of requested dwelling units, no change is proposed to the Grey Oaks PUD density. Approximately 1,159 residential dwelling units and 176 assisted living units have been built to date. Grey Oaks is a mixed use development that allows both residential (as discussed above) and commercial development via Ordinance #07-40. A total of 1,203,091 square feet of commercial development is allowed in the northeast and southeast quadrants. An additional 100,000 square feet of commercial development is allowed in the northwest quadrant. No changes are proposed to the allowable commercial development. According to Ordinance #07-40, Section IV.A., other uses that are permitted include golf course(s), open space for recreation facilities and community parks, community center/clubhouse(s), storage, maintenance yards, and landscaping nurseries within FP&L easements. No changes are proposed. Select FLUE Policies are given below, followed with [bracketed staff analysis]. FLUE Policy 5.6 "New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). " [It is the responsibility of the Zoning and Land Development Review staff, as part of their review of the petition in its entirety, to perform the compatibility analysis.] - FLUE Objective 7 and Relevant Policies Due to the minor changes proposed (no changes in permitted uses, densities, or intensities) beyond the currently approved Grey Oaks MPUD, and because the MPUD is significantly built -out, staff is of the opinion that only a re- evaluation of FLUE Policy 7.1 (pertaining to access) is necessary due to amendments to the Grey Oaks access points. FLUE Policy 7.1 "The County shall encourage developers andproperty owners to connect theirproperties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. " [The PUDA petition is requesting the elimination of two commercial access locations (previously approved within the Grey Oaks DRI Master Plan — Resolution 2000-190, DO 00-04 and the PUD Master Plan - Ordinance #07-40); one accessing Golden Gate Parkway and the other accessing Airport Road. The commercial access points proposed to be eliminated are not currently constructed, but are shown on the approved Master Plans. The petition is also requesting two new driveway access points be added on Livingston Road, which is identified as a minor arterial road in the Collier County Transportation Element Map 3.4 of the Growth Management Plan. The new access points will serve the future O'Donnell Nursery project only — not Grey Oaks residents.] CONCLUSION Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Amendment may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond Bellows, Planning Manager, Zoning Services Section PUDA-PL2017-1548 Grey Oaks R3.docx 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, FL 34104, 239-252-2400 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 1391 III OOP 7o, -�g N 40�1 tU� f;:Z, Af%. or IT. t IA Fig 141916 A 0 Z, ;3 IL lUdi r IQ �LJdMJNL�"-APPROXIM, ,lot; % &_I)f WkIr ��ACCESS P( LEGEND 0. Grady Minor an! Asso GradyMincir 9.D.5 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Wayne Arnold: Okay, let's get the meeting started I guess. I'm Wayne Arnold. I'm with Grady Minor and Associates. This is Sharon Umpenhour from our office. She'll be recording the meeting tonight. Uh, The County requires that we record these meetings and then create a — a verbatim transcript of the meeting in support of the planning commission members and the County Commissioners to review. Uh, with us tonight, Al O'Donnell is the property owner of the subject property tonight. And, Norm Trebilcock is Tranportation Engineer. John English behind him is with Barron Collier Companies Peninsula Engineering, he's the engineering record. And, um, this is Nancy Gundlach. Nancy is with Collier County Government. — Nancy Gundlach: — Hello. Wayne Arnold: — She's principal planner and she's here to monitor and answer any County related questions but, technically it's our meeting to explain to the members of the public what it is that we're attempting to do. So, we'll try to do that. I have a brief presentation and then turn it over to anybody who might have a question. So, what we're doing is amending the zoning document that's required of the Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact and the Planned Unit Development zoning. They had one common master plan for both of those documents. And, what we're proposing to do is to eliminate two unused access points. One on Airport Road and one on Golden Gate Parkway, and then create two new access points on Livingston Road that would only serve Mr. O'Donnell's property. He's got about 32 acres that is encumbered entirely under the FP&L easement south of the Grey Oaks entrance on the west side of Livingston Road. And, The County requires us to go through this process. So, we'll be going through the process of creating a new Master Plan exhibit. The County has asked us to create a couple of cleanup items in the PUD document itself, one of which is to allow them to build a multi- use path someday across a portion of Mr. O'Donnell's property. So, we'll have a commitment that allows them to do that. That'll be added. But, um, it's related to the request for the access point. That's an overall aerial exhibit outline of all of Grey Oaks. You can see that it's almost entirely built out. It's about 1600 acres and about 1600 dwelling units with commercial components and senior housing. That's, uh, the approved Master Concept Plan. It's hard to Page 1 of 10 Packet Pg. 1394 9.D.5 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM see but the access points there for instance, there for instance, main entrance here, main entrance over here, those are shown on the Master Plan, and that's what we're attempting to revise. You can see it — it's really hard to read on — here, let me go to the different exhibit to show that more clearly. This is an excerpt of the Master Plan but the two clouded areas on the south and west, that's an unused access point that was going to serve as a commercial tract at the Grey Oaks project. And then, the other one is on Golden Gate Parkway, where the arrow is, and it — it's labelled, "Relocate access point" up here. And then, if you look to the right of the page we're showing the two proposed relocated access points that would only serve — thank you whoever has them — the pointer, they uh, that would only serve Mr. O'Donnell's property within the — FP&L ea — FP&L easement. Those would not be access points that would service a — any of the residential component of the Grey Oaks PUD. This is a little bit of a, aerial exhibit that shows more of the FP&L easement and you can see the relationship of the proposed access points that we're showing. There's a directional left turn made right now and we're proposing that that would continue to be a directional left into this parcel, and then, on the south end where the construction road was just north of the FP&L facility, that would be a right and right of access point servicing Mr. O'Donnell's operation. The PUD is — been approved. All the uses are permitted. We're not proposing any new uses for the PUD. So, it allows for storage that FP&L easement allows for maintenance yard, landscape nurseries, et cetera, and we will be doing everything that's permitted under the PUD. And, that in a nutshell was — say, I'm gonna put this other exhibit back up, just to show you again on the Master Plan. But, that's really in essence the — the amendments that we're proposing to the PUD. I'd be happy to answer any questions. I know we've had a few emails from, probably some of your neighbors, but, um, anything we can answer we'll certainly try. Jean Foster: Just, uh, to clarify — Wayne Arnold: — Okay, if I could, one —just for one second. We're — The County's been very particular about, uh, getting things on the record so, if I could have anybody who wants to speak just speak into the microphone — Page 2 of 10 Packet Pg. 1395 9.D.5 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Jean Foster: — Okay. Wayne Arnold: — so we make sure that it's recorded, and if you don't mind giving your name. Jean Foster: Sure, sure. Not my social security — Wayne Arnold: — Correct. Jean Foster: Okay. Jean Foster: Um, my name is Jean Foster, and I live in Wyndemere Country Club, which is directly opposite the, uh, the property. Uh, one of the questions I have is, just so that I — I'm clear about it, uh, to enter the property heading northbound on Livingston from Golden Gate, you would be able to turn left in that turn lane and cut across traffic? Wayne Arnold: Yes, this is Wayne Arnold again. And yes, there is an existing left turn lane, and you're familiar with it I'm sure. — Jean Foster: — Right. Wayne Arnold: — It's south of your entrance and south of the signalized intersection with y — with Grey Oaks and Wyndemere. So yes, the idea would be that that turn lane would then create a drive entrance into Mr. O'Donnell's property and that would be his northern most entrance. And then, we have the southern entrance that's much closer to the FP&L facility. Ron Coleman: Um, Ronald Coleman and I also live in Wyndemere. Regarding the same entrance, we see a problem, um, at the northern end of Livingston Road where people cut across and go in the reverse on those left turn lanes, so they can go — in — in this case they would be going south, uh — when you're leaving the, um, for instance, um, the shopping center where, um, Starbucks is and so forth. They would come back by the tire store and then they'll be watching. And so, then they'll sneak across in or what is a turn lane into the shopping center, but they'll do the reverse and then go south. Uh, that's a problem. Also, I'm sure everyone aware — is aware here that, people will go down Livingston at approximately 55 and 60 miles an hour. We witnessed that this afternoon. We were doing, you know, five miles over the speed limit, but these, a BMW and a Lexus went speeding by in — significantly faster. And, you can check with the, uh, Police Department, they'll verify that. Uh, I'm concerned about trucks cutting across at that entrance, uh, the proposed entrance there Page 3 of 10 Packet Pg. 1396 9.D.5 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM across Livingston, because I think that that's going to be a real [inaudible] [00:07:22], and as Jean mentioned earlier, also in the morning, traffic going south on Livingston there is already backed up, uh, 15 minutes to try to get from — Jean Foster: — Sometimes. Ron Coleman: — you know, sometimes in season. To try to get from the, um, Wyndemere grounds traffic signal, down to the, uh, Golden Gate. And, if you have trucks going across there, it's not going to be manageable. Wayne Arnold: Thank you. Again, this is Wayne Arnold. The — The reason that Mr. O'Donnell likes the left end rather than having to use the main entrance gate at Grey Oaks is it's convenient directly into his site and it doesn't then have to use the gated access at Grey Oaks. But, having the signal there creates a gap for his trucks to make that turning movement so, when cars are stopped at the light you get a safe passage across and, Norm I don't know if you want to add anything else but, that's kind of the reason that it makes a very good break — natural break for the traffic flow. Al O'Donnell: Let me just — you can save a lot of money — Wayne Arnold: — S — S — Introduce yourself too. Al O'Donnell: Al O'Donnell. I can save a lot of money by not doing any of this, but, — Al O'Donnell: we thought that the Grey Oaks and the Wyndemere people would object strongly to us using the other intersection. — Jean Foster: — Well, that's correct, yes — Male Speaker: — Absolutely. Al O'Donnell: — So that's — that's we — we're making our own entry at significant expense and hassle — Ron Coleman: — Yeah. Jean Foster: Yeah. Al O'Donnell: — because we had to go through all this to change the entries and the DRI. Page 4 of 10 Packet Pg. 1397 9.D.5 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Ron Coleman: We're not arguing against you — Al O'Donnell: — NO. Ron Coleman: — we're just concerned about — about the speed and — Al O'Donnell: — Hmm, hmm. Ron Coleman: — you know, the access it causes. Al O'Donnell: Right. Okay. Ron Coleman: So much for that. Wayne Arnold: Okay, thanks. Any other questions? Comments? Male Speaker: [Inaudible] [00:09:01]. Wayne Arnold: Yes sir. Let me get you the microphone. Mike Donaghue: Mike Donaghue with Grey Oaks. Uh, I agree with the, uh, people previously. Uh, the traffic is a major problem and a while back in the newspaper it talked about Naples, that everybody was 20 miles over the speed limit so, — [Laughter] Mike Donaghue: — uh, it just, sort of the, uh, article that was in the paper. That will be a major problem. Uh, I'm concerned about laden trucks, noise, no retailer's gonna be there I understand. It's gonna be a wholesale. There're gonna be lights on the property for nightlights. Wayne Arnold: Thank you for your questions. Well, the PUD and the DRI set up some landscape nurseries, and I think that at the — probably initially Mr. O'Donnell's gonna operate that as wholesale operation but it doesn't preclude there from being retails operations there at some point in the future. Mike Donaghue: It doesn't preclude it? Wayne Arnold: It does not preclude it. With regard to lighting, Al or John, I don't know if you can address that question. I don't know the answer to that if you need... Page 5 of 10 Packet Pg. 1398 9.D.5 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Al O'Donnell: We had envisioned possible — possibly some security lightings in some areas. Um, there's a huge berm between, you know, Grey Oaks and this property, it's, you know, 10 foot plus, plus plants on top. I mean, certainly if we do lighting it would, you know, attempt to, you know, direct it towards the river wide of it, not towards Grey Oaks. Wayne Arnold: I think too, just so it's clear, all of his property encumbered under the Florida Power and Light easement area, which means there are restrictions and you have to get approvals from Florida Power and Light. For instance, you can't put things that are taller than 14 feet under their powerline easement et cetera. So, — Male Speaker: — No taller than 14 feet would be? Wayne Arnold: — Is that the planted material height or is that any high [inaudible] [00:11:00] — Male Speaker: — Everything. Wayne Arnold: Everything. Male Speaker: Yeah, the recent Condo was — Male Speaker: — No structures at all. Wayne Arnold: Right. No permanent structures permitted by FP&L there. Ron Coleman: One other question please. Uh, Ron Coleman again from Wyndemere. Would you define where you've got a, uh, area of weeds and grass and then you have a line of trees and then you have another area of weeds and grass and then you have Grey Oaks. What — what's planned with the line of trees there? Wayne Arnold: This is Wayne again. The existing vegetation that makes up the berm and landscape buffer that was planted by Grey Oaks will be untouched. It remains heavily — Wayne Arnold: — as Mr. O'Donnell mentioned, as a earth and berm and then it's got the — extensive mature vegetation on it. And, Mr. O'Donnell probably will be installing some more container plants in areas where The County in our, at least preliminary converstations have talked about if there were going to be storage areas or vehicles stored that they would look for landscape materials to be placed there, um, in addition to the landscape buffer that was already there. Al O'Donnell: Al O'Donnell again. I think what you're asking is about all the trees Page 6 of 10 Packet Pg. 1399 9.D.5 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM down the center. Ron Coleman: Yes, yes. Al O'Donnell: Well, it's absolutely illegal for me to have a big tree but, FP&L can do they want. — [Laugh] Al O'Donnell: — They have 50 foot trees in there, which, — Ron Coleman: Do you plan on leaving [inaudible] [00:12:23] — Al O'Donnell: — you know, I would be shot for but, you know... Ron Coleman: Are those coming down or are you planning on leaving them? Al O'Donnell: Um, I think as I develop a bit more and more, uh, most of them will come down. I made though within a north half south half, so they get cut. Now, I will be required by The County to take away all the invasive — invasive exotics in that area. There's a lot of — like, over half of those plants are not ones that The County wants to see there. Um, one other caveat — there's not structures allowed there now. Their people have said to me, "Well in the future, when we all get solar in our houses, do you think we'll need three sets of powerlines?" So, — [Laugh] Al O'Donnell: — I — I hope that my grandkids will — will be able to get this property without powerlines [inaudible]. But, we'll see. [Laughter] Wayne Arnold: Thanks Al. Yes sir. Mike Donaghue: Mike Donaghue again. What are the days and hours of operation that we would see somebody on that property? Wayne Arnold: Al, do you want to take a shot at this one? Al O'Donnell: Sure, I'd love to. Um, historically my company works from seven in the morning to, you know, five, six, seven at night. Um, people get there in the 06:30 range occasionally. Um, people might get there a little earlier and just wait for things to start. Uh, we don't have night operations. I recently, for the first time in my life did a job on Page 7of10 Packet Pg. 1400 9.D.5 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM 41 — US 41 east and all of the work was required to be done at night so... Wayne Arnold: — I — I think it's — Al O'Donnell: — In 30 years I did three night works, so... Ron Coleman: And days, if I may [Inaudible] [00:14:16] — Wayne Arnold: — My name is Wayne Arnold I just want to verify that there's an exception to the rule and, Al is subject to as growing plants that the whims of nature and freeze protection so there may be activities related to that. You know, — Al O'Donnell: — Hurricanes. Wayne Arnold: — preparations for hurricanes et cetera. So... Ron Coleman: Days of operation? Al O'Donnell: Um, my company works six days a week. We hardly ever work Sundays, but if — in, a place like this once the nursery was — was farther along and we had, you know, five, 10 acres of plants you would probably have one or two people stopping by to check the water on a Sunday where, if — not in the rainy season. Male Speaker: [Inaudible] Wayne Arnold: Yes sir. Michael Stoll: Michael Stoll, Grey Oaks. Uh, question. Uh, on the maintenance of material that is on the bluff currently is maintained by a combination of FPL, uh, on behalf [inaudible] closer to their powerlines, which are adjacent to the fence. And, then there's parts of that that we maintain. When I say "we" I mean Grey Oaks. Um, are we gonna have access to that area? Uh, is it gonna be a maintenance bluff. We're never gonna reach and access and, part two, where's the water gonna get — come from? Wayne Arnold: Thank you. Al, with the answer to the question about maintenance, I assume of their berm from your side. If they're currently using the FP&L easement for maintenance I'm assuming that you will allow that to continue. Al O'Donnell: Yeah. I — I — I don't have any problem with — with maintaining an Page 8 of 10 Packet Pg. 1401 9.D.5 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM access — maintenance access and, you guys might want to get to — to my side of your fences from my property. Um, it's — there's gonna be keys on the locks of course. When I fence and — and block those roads, we'll have to have locks for [inaudible] FP&L and I have no problem with you guys also having any access along there. Wayne Arnold: Are you gonna answer the question about the water too? Michael Stoll: Where you're getting your water? Al O'Donnell: W — I [inaudible] to put wells down. They, um, I wanted to dig a lake but FP&L said no. Um, so, um, maybe John can speak from an engineering point. Uh, the only place we could get water — we're planning to have at least two wells. Male Speaker: Is that...? Male Speaker: [Inaudible]. Wayne Arnold: Thank you. Yes ma'am. Jean Foster: Jean Foster. Uh, one question. Uh, I was kind of surprised by this multi -use path that The County is asking to set aside to get some land for. When is that gonna be building? What if — where do the plans — does it go? How far north does it go? Where does it go? [Laugh] Wayne Arnold: This is Wayne. I — I wish we had an answer for you but The County doesn't have the money to construct it. That's why they're asking Mr. O'Donnell to provide an easement for it so when they decide to go ahead and move forward on construction of it, they could do that within, uh, — an easement across his property. It's my understanding that this plan, uh, would link all the way into Lee County up to, um, Livingston Road and to the Imperial Parkway area in Lee County. It's on a long range transportation pathway plan. But, I don't believe there's any timeframe or monies dedicated to it. Jean Foster: So who — so, who owns the p — it — it's on your — it — it's on his property. Wayne Arnold: Correct. Jean Foster: Okay. Oh, interesting. [Laugh] Wayne Arnold: So, The County — Page 9 of 10 Packet Pg. 1402 9.D.5 PL20170001548, Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development (PUD) and PL20170001729, Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) 06-25-2018 NIM Jean Foster: — Kind of like a rental lease. Wayne Arnold: — The County is — well The County is asking for there to be that easement so they could construct it when necessary. So, Al would be cooperating with them regarding the location on his property. The County has some other easements and hopefully we can comingle their easements over his property. Male Speaker: Um, Wayne. Wayne Arnold: You don't want to? Norm Trebilcock: Uh, Norm Trebi — Trebilcock for the record. Just to, uh, maybe in answer to that. The Honda dealership that was recently developed right there at Pine Ridge in Livingston, there — there was a sidewalk against, um, Livingston Road there, and they ended up widening that sidewalk to — to 10 foot width — Norm Trebilcock: — and, that kinda took care of that pathway aspect of things, so, they're trying to give access to folks who kinda go heading north and south, so... Wayne Arnold: Thank you, Norm. Norm Trebilcock: Mm-hmm. Wayne Arnold: Anybody else? Questions, comments? Everybody wanna go home? Female Speaker: Cocktail. Wayne Arnold: [Laughs] Well, if there are no other questions, I'm, uh, go ahead and adjourn the meeting. Thanks everybody for coming out. Male Speaker: Thanks. Female Speaker: Thank you, Wayne. [End of Audio] Duration: 19 minutes Page 10 of 10 Packet Pg. 1403 Grey Oaks DRI/PUD June 25, 2018 Neighborhood Information Meeting 9.D.5 Packet Pg. 1404 r Project Team • Albert O'Donnell — O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner — Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • John C. English, P.E., Engineer — Barron Collier Companies, Peninsula Engineering 9.D.5 Packet Pg. 1405 1 Project Information 9.D.5 Existing Zoning: Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposed DRI/PUD amendment Request: Modify Master Plan to relocate two previously approved, unimproved, project access points from Golden Gate Parkway Airport Road, to Livingston Road. but and Packet Pg. 1406 1 ONZTFOI1■H.iII1l1I Approved Map H OR GHN6:RAI. ti0'ifSS ® ae9meIrnaL i7 xsrr.� rsrrraxmvr arn,a etm Q41p ✓•OVB9R .pPaomarr aH0 xfu. 10=M. vm ram Pmulmvao raacels� hi a" roue® u.�n+ars. u rwuarr x� AU {�T��[aa�xcsl o can cumsonae s u /u ouflNf- ( rv1=Zfcr mirlb/lm mr.otf O�ROE/S1r COltl[I6BARli •3'9Q ➢i�AP� IIAY eew-1a uP r0 844 1[OF.iYralu,T [RII7$ f� C�8 wu� rearm Rm %OeeEx�r avaauPaHT TO TOK M c.nas L r MG a.9 Y>�� Num R}FL 0l51N m ym""P (eexa�vaxieee +seas) VmI I n . Dose xor esc® ins cbrra. gm P PAee wo �cw4rsaraa:a rance m cern mm vvr Mat'" •[i0 MGM OPi a D 04vm Ii0IIH0 FIR R.ImWIIaL ll;mm QmT NC083rf OAn"02, LEGE �4i{aG9aLR9 I(YNIffi CetJR1Y! ��&YRIL ]72E$ZL? ACM 10{l tt ", mm OrrlCl%P17a1[. [14][If�C1a1. sou cOOBas/flECFinamRifOF'A+RY/Pi�•sr-or-xlr 1,248,OP1 B.PA.LL 74.40 x ercss.ii 71Yt b: a 141[:iG C�18e8ra'ROH 6.a1 susraras sx4rav 1WEDUSM p ttO&M iClf'r 9e K,P -1 ■ M4 (mm 110-71 as moo °a;am w 4wcP cae`nr-r�r IIfC kk 1la� eai ('0111LRT1T10# 06.51 m u mufalm 96A61 TML 1641.71 $fI11P 1i1R4Tx veaeaarnex PAe9884l9 MAWS [1Lr1V� r11iLL tfM=5 1T6R3'YLi01f N67raS10N 9Mlf714J4K SLP ! 65L.x ►.c. u7.1! a.c. 1ar.aa a.c ..eeuus.� oa4..c6r�brr�ixs4a.ew1 rlosr...>re.. —7 b 1rm ii NORTH 9.D.5 U) Cu 0 ,L^ V 00 LO O O O I,- 04 N J d O 00 O N N O 2 Z 4- 0 Q �L v N L C 0 E Q C d E t �.i �1 W1 Q Packet Pg. 1408 1 Access Exhibit UIUMEMM Mp relocate access point 9.D.5 _ proposed relocate i access point proposed relocated access paint D r NOITM a relocate access ; point Packet Pg. 1410 1 Proposed Access Locations Northern Access: Proposed right-in/right-out from the south bound lane of Livingston Road and a left -in from the north bound lane of Livingston Road Southern Access: right-in/right-out from the south bound lane of Livingston Road and no left -in from the north bound lane of Livingston Road WRTH Packet Pg. 1411 1 4 Ordinance 2007-40, Section 4.02.A.6 m 4.02 PERMITTED USES ANO STRUCTURES No hudding or structure, or pert thweDf, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part for other than the following: A, Permitled Principal Uses -and Structures 1) Golf fiovrse(s) 2) Tennis Club and facilities 3) Nater managernent facilities; essenlial services (in accordance wdh the LDC). Lake -a, including lakes with seawall and other types of architectural bainl treatment. } Open space recreational activities, community parks, and similar uses, includi:n but not limited to shuffleboard oourts. tennis courts, swimming pools, boat docks and ramp. came launches, fishing piers, tit storage, beach gazebos, concession. stands, hoallh trails, bike paths and nature trails, observalion Platforms, boardwalks, play -ground, picnic areas and other types of facilities intended for outdoor reereeGvn, 5) Community renter/clubhouse(s). j Slorage, maintenance yards, and landscaping nurseries within FP&L easements, rights-of-way. and open space. Subjecl to awovah of the persons or entities in whose favor the easement or right-of-way runs_ 7) Prajacl Information and Sales Center. 6) Any other use which is comparable in nature with the for ting 4,Ses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible in the district. Packet Pg. 1412 1 Questions? 9.D.5 a Packet Pg. 1413 9.D.6 Sharon Umpenhour From: Jim Butler <JButler@greyoakscc.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 12:28 PM To: Wayne Arnold Cc: Rafael Silva; John English (JEnglish @barroncolIier.com); Jeannie Manos Subject: FW: Grey Oaks Access for O'Donnell Nursery Attachments: JimButler 06-2017L.PDF; Access Relocation Exhibit.pdf Wayne, Grey Oaks has no objection to this proposal. Both the Country Club and the Property Owner's Chairmen, and myself, the General Manager has approved. Please let this email serve as official notice if possible. Thanks Jim ,dim ButCer Generaf,'Wanager 2400 Grey Oaks Drive North Naples, FL 34105 (239) 262-5550 (Club) (239) 262-3593 (Fax) Email: JButlercr�GrevOaksCC.com www.Grey0aksCC.co Note: If you have received this communication in error please delete all copies of the original message and attachments. From: Jim Butler Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:03 PM To: Jim Butler Subject: FW: Grey Oaks Access for O'Donnell Nursery ,dim ButCer Generaf�Uanager 4jreV Oak; 2400 Grey Oaks Drive North Naples, FL 34105 (239) 262-5550 (Club) (239) 262-3593 (Fax) Email: JButlercr�GrevOaksCC.com www.Grey0aksCC.co Note: If you have received this communication in error please delete all copies of the original message and attachments. From: Wayne Arnold[mai Ito: WArnoldCcbgradyminor.com] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 8:27 AM To: Jim Butler Packet Pg. 1414 Cc: 'John English'; Sharon Umpenhour Subject: Grey Oaks Access for O'Donnell Nursery Hello Jim, I am assisting Al O'Donnell with his landscape nursery improvements within the FP&L easement adjacent to Livingston Road. Al is trying to obtain dedicated access for his nursery operations from Livingston Road. We are proposing to amend the Grey Oaks PUD and DRI master plans to eliminate two previously approved but unused access points and add the two proposed access points on Livingston Road. We would appreciate it if you could review the attached information and provide us with a letter of no objection. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact John English or me. Thank you, Wayne D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Planning Director r dyMinor 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Phone - 239.947.1144 Fax - 239.947.0375 Web - http://www.aradyminor.com DISCLAIMER: This communication from Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., along with any attachments or electronic data is intended only for the addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or otherwise exempt from disclosure. The recipient agrees and accepts the following conditions: The electronic file/data is for informational purposes only and is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this electronic file/data with the approved and certified 'plan of record" along with actual project site conditions. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. reserves the right to revise, update and improve its electronically stored data without notice and assumes no responsibility due to a virus or damages caused by receiving this email. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 1415 9.D.7 Halstatt/Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI) (PL20170001729) Application and Supporting Documents September 6, 2018 CCPC Hearing Prepared August 13, 2018 © GradyMinor C10 Finghecrs • Land Sumyors • 31aaners • Landscape Amhiwts Packet Pg. 1416 9.D.7 Y N /L^ V 11'1 CD Q 0 T N J IL 0 c 0 w .Q a a LL c m E 0 r a E 2 a Packet Pg. 1417 9.D.7 GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects October 20, 2017 Eric Johnson, AICP, RLA Principal Planner Zoning Services, Planning & Zoning Department Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Grey Oaks DRI — PL20170001729 Dear Mr. Johnson: On behalf of our client, O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc., we are submitting an application for an Amendment to a PUD for the above referenced project. The proposed amendment is being requested in order to modify Exhibit E and Map H-1 attached to Development Order Number 2000-04, Resolution Number 2000-190. The amendment proposes to shift two previously approved, but unimproved, project access points from Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, to Livingston Road. The two project access points shown on Map H have not been installed; however, they were intended to serve as access points to the Grey Oaks community. The two access points proposed to be shifted to Livingston Road are not intended for general access to the Grey Oaks community, but rather are intended for the sole use by the owner of approximately 32 acres adjacent to Livingston Road. This portion of the Grey Oaks PUD is encumbered by a Florida Power & Light (FPL) easement. An exhibit identifying the existing and proposed access locations is included with this submittal. We have submitted a letter to DEO requesting that they determine the proposed access modifications to qualify as a Chapter 380.06(19)(e)2.k change. If determined by DEO to be an (e)2.k change, an NOPC application is not required. A copy of this correspondence is included in this application. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Enclosures Cc: Al O'Donnell John English GradyMinor File Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 www.gradyminor.com Packet Pg. 1418 Cot[ii"er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR (check one): Chapter 3 D.1 of the Administrative Code F.S. § 380.06 and 380.0651 ❑ DRI Application for Development Approval (DRI) ❑ DRI Notice of Proposed Change (DOA) 0 Other DRI Development Order Amendment (DOA) PROJECT NUMBER To be completed by staff PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Applicant(s): Albert O'Donnell Firm: O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. Address: 4291 Williams Road Telephone: 239.572.1011 E -Mail Address: al@odo.land Agent(s) Firm: Q Cell: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP City: Estero Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey 9.D.7 State: FL ZIP: 33928 Fax: City: Bonita Springs State: FL ZIP: 34134 Telephone: 239.947.1144 Cell: Fax: E -Mail Address: warnoid@gradyminor.com DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No Please provide the following information on separate sheets and attach to the application: El 1. If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name beneficiaries. 2. If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders. 10 3. If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate and name principals. 2/4/2015 Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 1419 9.D.7 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 ❑ 4. If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, if any. ❑ 5. If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. �❑ 6. If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address. PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application, if space is inadequate, attach on separate page: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Property I.D. Number: 47790008537 & 47790038426 Section/Township/Range: 24925 Subdivision: Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen Tract E Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds Description: Size of Property: ft. X ft. = Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Gate Parkway Plat Book: 33 Page #: 63 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: West side of Livingston Road north of Golden If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: Not applicable Section/Township/Range: Subdivision: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 2/4/2015 Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 1420 9.D.7 Cot[ii"er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 DETAIL OF REQUEST 1. Does the proposed action comply with the Collier County Growth Management Plan? ❑✓ Yes ❑ No If no, provide a written explanation on a separate sheet, attached to the application. 2. Hasa public hearing been held on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑✓ No If yes, please provide a written explanation of the hearing on a separate sheet, attached to the application. 3. If this is a NOPC application, has any portion of the DRI been: ❑✓ SOLD and/or ❑✓ DEVELOPED? If yes, please provide a written explanation on a separate sheet, attached to the application. 4. On a separate sheet attached to the application, please provide a detailed narrative statement that explains the requested action and why this action is proposed. Provide applicable supporting material and a list of all previous actions on the subject site, beginning with the original DRI/PUD approval and including all subsequent amendments. Include hearing number, hearing dates and a summary of the approved action. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer at its expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. 2/4/2015 Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 1421 9.D.7 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ DRI Application for Development Approval (DRI) ❑ DRI Notice of Proposed Change (DOA) ❑✓ Other DRI Development Order Amendment (DOA) Chapter 3 D.1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittals items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) ❑ ❑ ❑ Project Narrative 3 ❑ ❑ Pre -application meeting notes ❑ ❑ ❑ Completed Addressing checklist (no older than 6 months) 2 ❑ ❑ Site Development Plan, 24" x 36" copy, 8 W' x 11" copy, and one jpg copy (from DRI Development Order) ❑ ❑ ❑ An 8 % in. x 11 in. graphic location map of the site ❑ ❑ ❑ DRI Development Order Master Plan ❑ ❑ ❑ Legal Description 2 ❑ ❑ List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 ❑ ❑ Survey signed & sealed 4 ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 2 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 3 ❑ ❑ Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys 2 ❑ ❑ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 5 ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS) or waiver 5 ❑ ❑ Completed State NOPC Form with all attachments (if amendment) ❑ ❑ ❑ Completed State ADA Form with all attachments (if original DRI) ❑ ❑ ❑ Draft DRI Development Order to address proposed change ❑ Copies of Notices sent to DEO and RPC 2 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans 1 ❑ ❑ School Impact Analysis Application - residential projects only (download the School Impact Analysis Application from website) 2 ❑ ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement SCHOOL CONCURRENCY - If the proposed project includes a residential component, you are required to contact the School District of Collier County at 239-377-0267 to discuss school concurrency requirements. 2/4/2015 Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 1422 9.D.7 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Addressing: Annis Moxam ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet El Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ❑Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nicole Ryan ❑ Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad ❑ County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock El Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay ❑ Engineering: Alison Bradford ❑ Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky ❑ Other: ❑ Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months after the date of the last pre -app meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre -application meeting shall be required) :1 DRI Review (In addition to cost of rezone): $10,000.00 plus $25.00 per acre (or fraction thereof) o Additional fee for 5th and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee DRI/DO Amendment: $6,000.00 plus $25.00 per acre (or fraction thereof). The acreage charge does not apply for amendments which only change the build -out date of the DO for a time period of less than 5 years. o Additional fee for 5th and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee o Amendments deemed to be minor in nature, that is requiring minor strike thru and underline text amendments of no more than 10 different lines of text changes in the DRI, will be capped at $13,000.00. o Any amendment which includes a map and text change will assessed the full fee (no cap) DRI Extension: $100.00 :1 DRI Comprehensive Plan Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee: o CCPC: $925.00 o BCC: $500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review: $1,000.00 Property Owner Notifications: $1.50 Non -certified; $3.00 Certified return receipt mail (to be paid after receipt of invoice from the Zoning Services Department) :1 Transportation Fees, if required: o Methodology Review: $500.00 o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review: $1,500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if required: [reserved] o Mitigation Fees, if applicable, are to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Review: 2/4/2015 Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 1423 CDfer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net o DOA: $120.00 o DRI: $200.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 2/4/2015 Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 1424 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUDA Date and Time: Wed 5/10/2017 - 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM Assigned Planner: Eric Johnson Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Grey Oaks DRI/PUD PL #: PL20170001548 Property ID #: 47790000108 Current zoning: P_U9— Project Address: 2400 GREY OAKS DRIVE City: Naples Applicant: GradyMinor Agent Name: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Agent/Firm Address. 3800 Via Del Rey Property Owner: O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. Please provide the following, if applicable: L Total Acreage: 16.07 ii. iv. V. vi Proposed # of Residential Units: Proposed Commercial Square Footage: Mr UD State: FL Zip: 34105 Phone: 239-947-1144 City: Bonita Springs State: FL For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: Zip: 34134 If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the /� type and number: �� L�G 19 C P �; Z(iG a _ If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: c��D1,JINJCe 07- qu Packet Pg. 1425 Co*lr County 9.D.7 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# PL2017O001548 (PUDA) Collier County Contact Information: Updated 4/26/2017 514KW9- Cf V,' t ted �l i►� �efi�iw�e� Page 1 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 1426 Name David Anthony Review Discipline Environmental Review Phone 252-2497 Email davidanthony@colliergov.net Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 StephenBaluch@colliergov.net J Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@colliergov.net J George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio@colliergov.net ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net ❑ Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-5740 Scottstone@colliergov.net ❑ Dale Fey North Collier Fire Safety dalefey@colliergov.net ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2434 ericfey@colliergov.net ❑ Impact Fee Administration Cl Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons@colliergov.net Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net Shar Hingson East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.org �I John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net . Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes@colliergov.net U Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net U Stephen Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net ,1, Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 paulomartins@colliergov.net Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net L_I Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net U Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net ❑ Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Impact Fees 252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net Michele Mosca, AICP Impact Fee Administration 252-2466 michelemosca@colliergov.net Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net LI Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheltree@colliergov.net ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@colliergov.net l _l Bill Pancake Laurie Beard ! North Collier Fire Safety PUD Monitoring 252-2310 252-5782 billpancake@colliergov.net lauriebeard@colliergov.net I Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net Updated 4/26/2017 514KW9- Cf V,' t ted �l i►� �efi�iw�e� Page 1 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 1426 Co*lr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net 7 Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Stormwater Plan Review 252-290 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net Richard Orth Stormwater Plan Review 252-5092 richardorth@colliergov.net jt*M C Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net Chris Scott, AICP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net Ll Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 petershawinsky@colliergov.net Eric Johnson, AICP, CFM Zoning Services 252-2931 ericjohnson@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 marktempleton@colliergov.net v/ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@colliergov.net Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen@colliergov.net Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net 7 David Weeks, AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5748 christinewilloughby@colliergov.net Camden Smith Zoning Services/ Operations Analyst 252-1042 camdensmith@colliergov.net 7 Patty Kulak Zoning Services / Planning Tech 252-1035 patriciakulak@colliergov.net John DeBlasiis Zoning Services /Planning Tech 252-1050 johndeblasis@colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email ICAA&L S Ptlp- Wt^/ 252-2s89 MKw�as,Eve+ ce�uEeso�.Ner p> n ANNE u, ow R, " 721du d C O L iv i IAJ Mm jt*M C PCAit LA . a Updated 4/26/2017 Page 1 5 of 5 9.D.7 010 C Q Packet Pg. 1427 9.D.7 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net CORY County Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 Packet Pg. 1428 9.D.7 CoVer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 4/26/2017 Page 1 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 1429 0 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coiliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes -r2 Q 7e- UJ -f- w - P,4 - /2/ -r c /0r-rP_sS -1200 e?"-etiT_i 9.D.7 0 a 2 CA Y 0 d V LO 0 0 O r r 0 N J a 0 Iq le cv v Q Q. a d E m a E z 0 m r Q Packet Pg. 1430 Co ier County Growth Management Department Submittal Checklist for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. 1 REQUIREMENTS CODES REQUIRED REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary �/ I-1 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments Pre -application meeting notes ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist ❑ Warranty Deed(s) List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 4 ❑ 10, Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 4IT Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 5/ E ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. ❑ Traffic Impact Study -n-,> S ❑ Historical Survey ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents Checklist continued onto next page... 2/21/2017 Page 1 of 3 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1431 �� Completed Exhibits A -F (see below for additional information)' ❑ 9 ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %:" x 11" copy City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD fV 2/' I/ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet:: IIY Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code E� Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy ❑ Lockheart ❑ Conservancy ofSWFL:NicholeRyan SofIAiS��% Utilities Engineering: KrISVmT1Mfgerr— ERIC FeY ❑ Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: I ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 P/A Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre - application meeting): $2,500.00 ►SIA Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: Ems. L*DAR'tP_ pfj o Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00;�/,�,r f I Legal Advertising Fees: i VV��1� o CCPC: $1,225.00 P�e � J,i,C l o BCC: $500.00 � 1 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 2/21/2017 Page 2 of 3 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1432 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County *Additional fee for the 5"' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. All checks may be made payable to: Board of County Commissioners 2/21/2017 Page 3 of 3 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1433 1 mit" , »_ {�► � � i �. .` � � � � � .� . ' 440 14 4il t,,;a ;• f +s . . ............ , lop iJO �'Joe, ' Ara P / PROPERT Ir f •yw�' '�'. i - w �•A .I - A A ��.Ov ,j � I.. • J o o y� �S(E 0 o � �L•WUtl,,V�,�BC31 e D U.-@AAMC 2W.o N' ' oo ' o dfumlc�s(" l .1 1 1 305 610 Feet Co ler C;014nty Gmwth Management Department Zoning Division PL20170001548 (PUDA) PRE -APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Camden Smith John DeBlasiis STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-APPLICATOIN MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre -app request Sharon Umpenhour/ 239-947-1144 / sumpenhour@gradyminor.com • Agent to list for PL# Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., D. Wayne Arnold, AICP • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. • Confirm Purpose of Pre -App: (Rezone, etc.) Yes / No (list purpose if different) • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): Proposed amendment to the Grey Oaks PUD/DRI master plans in order to eliminate two access points on Golden Gate Pkwy and add two access locations on Livingston Road. These relocated access points will serve only the landscape nursery operations that are permitted within the Grey Oaks PUD. • PUD or PUD -A — is this a phased development and if so what schedule is being proposed? NO Supplemental Information provided by: Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician sumpenhour@gradyminor.com 239-947-1144 Created April 5, 2017 Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zor ing Division • 2800 Nath Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104.239-252-2400 • www.cdiagov.net 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1435 DeBlasiisJohn Subject: PL20170001548 (PUDA) Location: Conf Room C Start: Wed 5/10/2017 9:00 AM End: Wed S/10/2017 10:00 AM Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Accepted Organizer: CDS-C Required Attendees: Sharon Umpenhour; Acevedo Margarita; AhmadVicky; AlcornChris; Amy Lockhart -Taylor; AnthonyDavid; ArnoldMichelle; AshtonHeidi; AuclairClaudine; BaluchStephen; Beard Laurie; BeasleyRachel; BrownAraqueSummer; BrownCraig; CascioGeorge; CondominaDanny; CrotteauKathynell; CrowleyMichaelle; David Ogilvie; DeBlasiisJohn; dfey@northcollierfire.com; DumaisMike; FaulknerSue; FeyEric; FleishmanPaula; GarciaShirley; GewirtzStorm; GosselinLiz; GundlachNancy; HouldsworthJohn; HughesJodi; HumphriesAlicia; JacobLisa; jnageond@sfwmd.gov; KendallMarcia; KulakPatricia; KurtzGerald; LenbergerSteve; LevyMichael; Imartin@sfwmd.gov; LouviereGarrett; MartinezOscar; MastrobertoThomas; McCaughtryMary; McKennaJack; McKuenElly; McLeanMatthew; MoscaMichele; MoxamAnnis; NawrockiStefanie; OrthRichard; PajerCraig; Patricia Kulak@colliergov.net; PattersonAmy; PepinEmily; pjimenez@sfwmd.gov; PochmaraNatalie; ReischlFred; RodriguezWanda; RomanDaniel; RosenblumBrett; SantabarbaraGino; SawyerMichael; ScottChris; ShawinskyPeter; Shawn Hanson; SheaBarbara; SmithCamden; SmithDaniel; StoneScott; StrainMark; SuleckiAlexandra; SummersEllen; SweetChad; tamiscott; TempletonMark; VanLengenKris; VelascoJessica; WalshJonathan; WeeksDavid; Wickham Flannery; WilloughbyChristine; JohnsonEric Planner: Eric Johnson Fire District: Greater Naples ------------------------------------- 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1436 Co't�er C 014"ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) Fol OTHER DRI/PUD Amendment LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) Grey Oaks DRI/PUD, S24, 25, 26/T49/R25 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) Grey Oaks DRI/PUD See Attached STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) See Attached • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Grey Oaks DRI/PUD PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (forexisting projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # PUD 89-6 DRI 89-1 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1437 C&T COMHty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Grey Oaks Please Return Approved Checklist By: 0 Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour Phone: Email/Fax: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number See Attached Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by �--�- Date: 5/1/2017 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1438 9.D.7 � D 1.02 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lo R 0 All that part of Section 24, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, lying easterly of that 100 foot canal right-of-way as described in O. R. Book 154, page 6, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; o 0 0 ti ALSO N N J a. 0 All that part of Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, lying easterly of that 100 foot canal right-of-way as described in O.R. Book 154, page 6, a O.R. Book 873, page 1879 and O.R. Book 873, page 1882, all of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; Q a LESS Golden Gate Parkway (C-886) as described in O.R. Book 465, page 275, and O. R. Book 465, page 278, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; ALSO LESS those lands described in O.R. Book 194, page 603 and O.R. Book 640, page 229, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, a E a Packet Pg. 1439 9.D.7 D a U) R 0 d i ALSO T" 0 All that part of Section 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, Co lying westerly of Airport -Pulling Road (C-31) and northerly of Golden Gate Parkway PJ 886) located within the City of Naples;a. 0 LESS that portion thereof as described in O.R. Book 539, page 370, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; above property subject to easements and restrictions of record; containing 1,60 1.39 net acres more or less. Q LL E U fC r r Q Packet Pg. 1440 Grey Oaks DRI/PUD 9.D.7 N w * V S © GradyiMinor 2,300 1,150 0 2,300 Feet Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • PianneN • Landscape Architects Packet Pg. 1441 9.D.7 FLN NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 47790130065 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333003052 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 267120804 TRADITIONS GOLF RESIDENC AT GREY OAKS CONDO ASSN % SENTRY MGMT 7333000068 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333007061 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 7333008057 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333010061 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 53220001140 LA RESIDENCES AT GREY OAI LTD PARTNERSHIP 3200 BAILEY LN STE 117 53220002026 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS ( ASSN INC 22712000127 GREENMAN, KAREN M 2687 FIREBUSH LN 22712000143 MILLER, LINDA G 2683 FIREBUSH LN 22712001045 WAKELY, DAVID L=& JULIE E 155 BEDFORD PARK AVE 22712001401 EGGERICHS, JOAN K 4777 N GRANDVIEW DR 22712001029 MCCLOUD, MARK KAREN WILLIS 22712000664 MARGARET C FIOCCHI REV T 2618 TRILLIUM WAY 22712000949 UHLIG, RICHARD A=& JANET 2615 TWINFLOWER LN 22712000321 PEPE, MICHAEL=& LAURIE H 2663 CALADIUM WAY 22712001443 MARTIN J CROWE III TRUST 12547 AVILA LN 22712000525 HAGAN, GAIL C 2629 SORREL WAY 22712000648 WOOD, BARRIE R=& SUZANI` 2614 TRILLIUM WAY 22712001427 ANDERSON, VIRGINIA L=& G 5 RENAISSANCE SQ, UNIT 26E 22712001566 TILEY, BENJAMIN F=& ANGEI 2523 AVILA LN 22712000800 ROONEY III, ARTHUR J CHRISTINE B ROONEY 22712000363 DIAZ, JOHN R JULIE JAMIESON 22712000981 KELLY, PETER K=& BARBARA 2607 TWINFLOWER LN 22712000680 MARSHALL, EMYLIA 2173 SHAWANAGA TRAIL 22712001100 MENCKE, GEORGE M 2583 TWINFLOWER LN 22712001142 WESTPHAL, RAINER J 314 WINFIELD RD 22712000567 JOHNSTON, GEORGE G=& N) 2621 SORREL WAY 22712000509 KENNETH R GILMAN REV TRI 2633 SORREL WAY 22712001485 DANIEL H KRUSE REV TRUST 2539 AVILA LN RESORT MANAGEMENT 4604 ABERCORNE TER 2646 TRILLIUM WAY 2655 CALADIUM WAY 22712000787 BOROW, TONIA 2642 TRILLIUM WAY 22712001508 MCPARTLAND, JAMES F=& C 2535 AVILA LN 22712000305 THOMPSON III TR, JOHN M JOHN M THOMPSON III P/R/1 KAREN L THOMPSON TR 22712000703 SAWYER, HARRISON H PO BOX 7225 22712001524 KATHERINE A MABE 2014 TR 2750 COMMONS DR #304 22712001540 BARRY & TOSKA QUINNIES L 2527 AVILA LN 22712000729 MCGUIRE TR, MICHAEL MCGUIRE TR, SEAN THE CAMILLE MCGUIRE QPR 22712001168 LAMB -HEINZ TR, CATHERINE 437 SHERIDAN RD 22712000266 BURKE LIVING TRUST 2675 CALADIUM WAY 76925000960 MOORADIAN, FAIRLYN F 2071 TORINO WAY 22712000062 MARGARET J HURWICH 201( 1300 NORTH LAKE SHORE DR #32A 53220001182 BRODHUN, ANDREW R=& EL 2598 LERMITAGE LN 22712001087 SUSAN WELLS REYNOLDS TR 2587 TWINFLOWER LANE 7333009027 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 76925012327 JANE D SICHAU REV TRUST 2105 MODENA CT Packet Pg. 1442 77089000067 VILLAS OF TRADITIONS AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNERS A % SENTRY MGMT, INC 76925001008 THERESA L MISURACA REV T 2079 TORINO WAY 76925001082 CELANI, DANIEL J=& ANNE 2096 RIVOLI CT 76925001147 FRANK J HAGUE REV TRUST 7212 STILTON CT 76925001422 BENHAM, NEAL R=& JANE A 2125 MODENA CT 76925001448 MILLER, EDWARD 0=& JUNE 2121 MODENA CT 76925000986 LAURA L DIGGES REVOCABLE 2075 TORINO WAY 76925001406 CENTRACCHIO, NOREEN D 2575 RUE DU JARDIN #501 76925001066 JUDITH A ZOLLMANN REV TF 2092 RIVOLI CT 76925001765 CLARK II, JOHN B=& KATHRY 2157 ASTI CT 76925001749 BUTLER, JAMES B & JENNIFE 2161 ASTI CT 76925001383 FEINBERG, ELLIOT ROXANNE E PARKER 2126 MODENA CT 76925001668 SPIDALETTO LOSKILL, DOREE 2160 ASTI CT 76925001024 DOHERTY, EDWARD=& BARE 2083 TORINO WAY 76925001723 LYE, MARK R=& LISA J 16763 PRATO WAY 76925001163 TERRENCE J BACHNER REV T 2091 RIVOLI CT 76925001189 HAAG, JOYCE P 2087 RIVOLI CT 76925001367 DARLENE ELIZABETH DAGGE 500 S WATERLOO DR 76925001341 ROBERT A HERSHEY TRUST 2118 MODENA CT 22712000460 O'NEILL, NANCY NAPLES 2641 SORREL WAY 76925001105 D'APPOLONIA, MICHAEL R ELIZABETH F D'APPOLONIA 2100 RIVOLI CT 22712000389 IRONS, RICK=& SUSAN BOX 750 22712001362 DELP, JOHN K=& JANE M 157 COUNTRY CLUB DR 76925012408 SANDRA M STARK TRUST 2143 TORINO WAY 76925012385 MYERS, JONATHAN C=& MEI 2139 TORINO WAY 22712000088 TENNENT JR, ANDREW=& SL 2690 FIREBUSH LN 76925012107 MCLAUCHLAN, GABIJA LABA 2088 RIVOLI CT 76925012123 GEORGE, DAVID B ELAINE K CHAMBERS 2089 TORINO WAY 76925012165 KELLEHER, ANDREW J=& RH(2097 TORINO WAY 76925012149 WILLIAM S WELLS REV TRUS' MARY J WELLS REV TRUST 2093 TORINO WAY 7333009043 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS 76925005020 KING, JON M 22712000444 SEYMOUR, VIVECA S 76925012181 CCC TRADITIONS LLC PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 2164 ASTI CT 18 COUNTRY CLUB RD 2020 SALZEDO STREET 22712000965 CROTTY, JOHN T=& KAREN R 709 MOUNTAIN RD 76925012369 GILCHRIST, JAMES R=& GINA PO BOX 6476 76925012343 NELSON, T LANE=& CHERYL 12101 MODENA COURT 47790008029 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 22712000240 BOWERS, D STUART MARY V PERRY 53220002084 MARIAN R HAAG Q/P/R TRU 2650 LERMITAGE LN 53220001166 KESSLER, SUSAN V 4612 WIDGEON PATH 22712001003 KAMAREK, WILLIAM G=& L11' 2603 TWINFLOWER LN 76925001707 LYE, MARK R 16763 PRATO WAY 76925012440 SMYTHE, MARK A=& CARLA 819 YORK RD 53220002042 LA RESIDENCES AT GREY OAI PARTNERSHIP 53220002068 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS ( ASSN INC SUITE #200 3117 DAHLIA WAY 3200 BAILEY LN STE 117 RESORT MANAGEMENT 22712000282 R H JOSEPH JR REV LIV TRUS' MARILYN JOSEPH REV LIV TRl 109 SALEM AVE 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1443 76925012204 DONALD NEIL GISSLER TRUS- 2106 MODENA CT 76925012288 COMPALL JR, JOHN H CAROLINE E COMPALL 984 PINE TREE LN 76925012262 FRESE, THOMAS CHARU ANEJA 2117 MODENA CT 47790002708 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333008044 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 53220001289 BURCH, KIMBERLY G JOSHUS M D HALL III 7616 LHIRONDELLE CLUB RE 22712001469 MURRAY, JOHN K=& DIANE 12543 AVILA LN 76925001121 WILLIAM B WHITMAN FAM - 10 VILLAGE CENTER DR 76925012246 MCDONOUGH JR, JOSEPH J CYNTHIA A MCDONOUGH 2114 MODENA CT 76925012301 ZHANG, LU XIANGHONG HUA 201 FREEMAN ST #A 8 76925012424 JAKSICH, JEAN LYNETTE 5163 INAGUA WAY 22712000347 RUTER, HARRY E CYNTHIA R TOLLES-RUTER 2659 CALADIUM WAY 7333007045 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 77089000782 BERNSTEIN, ADAM H=& DAR 199 N AMHERST RD 47790022047 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333007029 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 77089000863 DAVIS, DAVID B=& CYNDE C 2273 RESIDENCE CIR 22712000101 2691 FIREBUSH LANE LLC 702 N BLACKHAWK AVE STE I 76925012220 KIMPS FAMILY LIVING TRUST PO BOX 10768 77089001040 ALTMAN, MARTIN S=& AKIK(2252 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 77089001066 JAMES G SULLIVAN TRUST REGINA ANN SULLIVAN TRUS 2248 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 77089000423 MCGILLIS, JOHN M=& LISA P 2195 RESIDENCE CIR 22712001346 MCGUIRE, BARBARA ERNEST J FIORE 2567 AVILA LN 77089000766 BRETT C OLEY LIV TRUST 2243 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001105 SHARON J FREEMAN REV TRS 2240 RESIDENCE CIR 53220002123 GIANNELLI TR, GERDA R GERDA R GIANNELLI TRUST UAD 10/21/05 53220002107 JUDY A VOET REVOCABLE TR 2654 LERMITAGE LN 77089001121 JOANN M REHAK TRUST 2236 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 7333008028 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 53220001221 SHUCART, JAMES=& MARY E 2606 LERMITAGE LN 47790027107 HAGANS, MATTHEW D 2242 SILVER PALM FL 77089001082 PESCHEL, ERROL C BARBARA SPEARING 2244 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001024 HUMMER, JAMES J=& KIMB12256 RESIDENCE CIR 53220001263 BURKE, ROBERT W=& DONN 2359 ALEXANDER PALM DR 22712000761 VANDE MOORE TRUST 2638 TRILLIUM WAY 22712000745 ROBERT P CADWELL REV TR(2634 TRILLIUM WAY 77089000805 SMALLA, FRANK H=& SABINE 98 LOCUST RD 22712000541 1331977 ALBERTA LIMITED 2700 CARLETON ST SW 77089001147 CHRISTOU, NICOLAS V KATERINA P CHRISTOU 405 SMALL ST 77089001163 BRAVERMAN FAMILY TRUST 2228 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 77089000504 LONDON, FREDERICK W SUSAN CORSETTI LONDON 2211 RESIDENCE CIR 76925012466 HOWELL, ROBERT A=& ELIZA 2153 ASTI COURT 77089001325 SCANCARELLA, JOHN=& KAR 2191 WASHINGTON VALLEY F 77089000481 BOTTE, MICHAEL D=& EILEEI 2207 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001309 MILTON HOTELS LTD REGISTERED CO OF SCOTLAN 8 NESS WALK 77089000847 ONEIL, PAUL R=& JUDITH A 2269 RESIDENCE CIR 47790099300 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS � 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1444 77089000708 BIRCH ET AL, CHARLES FREDI 11 TH AVE PARK LANE 77089000520 SOLAZZO, STEVEN CARL JUNE ANNELLA DECKER 2215 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001189 JEAN DEE GREENBERG REV T 2224 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001341 RYAN III, THOMAS N 2192 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001286 ROMANO, DAVID CAROLYN ROMANO 2204 RESIDENCE CIR 77089000821 DAVIS, VERNON J 2265 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 77089000465 SEMERE, PETER R=& SANCHI 2203 RESIDENCE CIR 22712001126 DAVIS, ANTHONY R=& MARN PO BOX 759 47790099287 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 77089001260 CLUB 2208 TRUST 2208 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 2235 RESIDENCE CIR 77089000449 LINDEMANN, JOHN A S YVONNE LINDEMANN 2199 RESIDENCE CIR 53220001247 BUFFINGTON, ALAN R KATHERINE E BUFFINGTON 2610 LERMITAGE LN 77089000546 ADELE M FAHEY REV TRUST 807 DEER TRAIL LN 7333009182 ROY, YVES 77089000562 JAMES A ISRAEL REV TRUST DEBORAH A ISRAEL REV TRUE 6705 AUGUSTINE CT 47790021103 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 77089000164 JANIE BRADY BROWN TRUST 2331 TRADITIONS CT 53220002149 KOHN, J DAVID=& JEANETTE 64 GOODNOUGH RD 77089000928 SCHMITZ, CHRISTOPHER P PAMELA R SCHMITZ 2285 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 77089000889 PRENTICE, ROBERT A=& VER 2277 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 22712001061 LAWRENCE S KLOCK REV TRI 2591 TWINFLOWER LN 76925012563 SANCHEZ, FAUSTINO F=& GI' 2136 TORINO WAY 77089001244 STAHLMAN, MARK S=& JOAP 2212 RESIDENCE CIR 77089000902 GOLDFARB, ARTHUR J=& JO) 24A BROADVIEW RD 76925012589 VASQUEZ, JOSE WENDY REGINA VASQUEZ 28 AUDUBON LN 77089000740 TYRRELL, KAY 2239 RESIDENCE CIR 53220001124 LA RESIDENCES AT GREY OAI LTD PARTNERSHIP 3200 BAILEY LN STE 117 77089000407 LAUREN D MAXWELL LIV TRI 2191 RESIDENCE CIR 77089000724 REGINA G HENNEY TRUST 2235 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001202 RIOS, FELIPE=& SHARON 2220 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 76925012602 SUKEFORTH, JAMES A SUSAN RENACCIO 2098 TORINO WAY 76925012628 JONATHAN TYNDALL FLOE TI 2092 TORINO WAY 7333009182 ROY, YVES SYLVIE FILION 1485 SHERBROOKE ST WEST 53220001205 1933 MONTANA AVE LLC 1267 DARTMOUTH CT 76925012644 MICHAEL & CHERYL ROE LIV 2086 TORINO WAY 77089000944 MONTES, LILLIAN 2289 RESIDENCE CIR 77089001228 DAVID J PAULDINE QPR TRU' MARIA C PAULDINE QPR TRU 804 S COLFAX AVE 76925012660 GREY OAKS TORINO 52 TRUE 2078 TORINO WAY 47790027123 MARY ANN BEATTIE TRUST 2238 SILVER PALM PL 76925012686 RIGSBEE, NED L=& PAMELA 2074 TORINO WAY 51999000021 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIC C/O RESORT MANAGMENT 7333009946 VARI, ANDRAS J=& CONSTAI` 148 HARBRIDGE MANOR 7333009920 WALLACE, HENRY D G=& IRA 1576 MARSH WREN LN 7333009904 V J & P A GIBLIN REV TRUST 1572 MARSH WREN LANE 7333009205 TOWNSEND, CHARLES=& BE' 16 CORBIN DR 47790026687 HUNTER, BETTY L 2326 SILVER PALM PL 77089001367 MARTIN, WILLIAM F=& JANE 2188 RESIDENCE CIRCLE 77089000588 JAMES A DONALDSON TRUS- 2233 ABERDEEN CT 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1445 22712001388 E N GILBARD 2002 FMLY TRL 2559 AVILA LN 47790022021 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 77089000326 HAMILL III, JAMES P=& PATR 2346 TRADITIONS CT 77089000960 PLETT NAPLES TRUST 43 BURNLEY PL 7333000042 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 77089000368 WILLIAM J SULZMANN TRUS 2336 TRADITIONS CT 7333009328 GAFFNEY, J MICHAEL=& BOIN 1549 MARSH WREN LANE 7333000026 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333009881 BINKOWSKI, CAROLE 1568 MARSH WREN LANE 22712000486 WILLE, GAIL ELIZABETH THEODORE MORGAN WILLIE J 2637 SORREL WAY 77089000986 BERTIL D NORDIN REV TRUS- 2297 RESIDENCE CIR 7333009344 L ALUISE FMLY DYNASTY TRL 1545 MARSH WREN LN 7333009865 BEATTY, RICHARD F 1564 MARSH WREN LN 7333009849 SELVA FAMILY TRUST 2716 LAKEWOOD PT 47790023046 FRY, DONALD C=& SHARYN F 3099 INDIGOBUSH WAY 7333009289 MANS, MICHAEL D=& PATRh 1561 MARSH WREN LN 7333009768 HOEL, RICHARD=& DOROTH` 1544 MARSH WREN LN 47790026700 EST TAX SHELTERED TRUST ANN K HUBLITZ 2322 SILVER PALM PL 7333009247 MARJORIE A SPRINGER REV - 1569 MARSH WREN LN 7333010045 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333010029 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790026865 1388981 ONTARIO ONC 10 OWEN BLVD 47790026881 M A & V L PERDZIAK REV TRI 2286 SILVER PALM PL 47790026849 REDA, SALVATORE W=& BAR 2294 SILVER PALM PL 7333009823 DISABATO, JENNIFER A 1556 MARSH WREN LN 47790026904 FLOYD, REBECCA A 2282 SILVER PALM PL 47790023143 SCHERMAN, DEBRA D=& DA13119 INDIGOBUSH WAY 7333009742 WINTER BREAK FL LAND TRL 1540 MARSH WREN LANE 47790026823 RAEDEL, JOHN R=& SHEILA K 2298 SILVER PALM PL 47790026807 HOWARD TR, DAVID P=& DE D P & D HOWARD REV TRUST UTD 9/8/00 7333007744 MANNING LIVING TRUST 1358 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333007126 SHOTELL, RICHARD G 45 MAIN ST 7333007168 FOX, GORDON 257 LYTTON BLVD 7333007760 MICHAEL S POLK TRUST 18273 JUSTICE WAY 7333007142 GOSSELIN JR, JOSEPH V DIANE Y GOSSELIN 7333007786 BRUCE, MICHAEL J=& BARBA 1364 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333009360 BAINUM, ROBERT EVERARD CHARMAINE CAW BAINUM 7333009263 AHEARN, GEORGE P=& MAR 1565 MARSH WREN LN 47790026920 MULLICAN, R WAYNE=& SUS 2278 SILVER PALM PL 7333007524 FLOYD, CHARLES E_& CHARL 20 PUTNAM ROAD 7333007582 MOORE, MALCOLM F 1326 NOBLE HERON WAY 77089000643 THOMAS K & RONDILYN C M4909 WYANDOTTE ST 7333007689 YOUNG, PETER=& KELLY F 1346 NOBLE HERON WAY 77089000669 FERGUSON, STEPHEN L=& C( 225 N WASHINGTON 7333007223 MITCHELL, JAMES=& MARGO 1380 GREAT EGRET TRAIL 7333007728 GIFFORD J WELLS TRUST 1354 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333007184 WEEDMAN, JEFFREY D=& Cl- 1355 NOBLE HERON WAY 8 BLUEBERRY BND 4320 FOREST HILL DR 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1446 7333007605 MICHAEL J HUBER REV TRUS 1330 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333007249 SMITH, ANDREW=& LESLEY 1343 NOBLE HERON WAY 77089000384 PINTO, FRANK A=& BONNIE. 2909 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790023062 JUDITH E FELIX REVOCABLE 13103 INDIGOBUSH WAY 77089000342 GARNETT, RICHARD E GABRIELLA N GARNETT 2342 TRADITIONS CT 47790023101 MICHAELIS, WOLF D SANDA, MARIE 3111 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790023088 HOGAN, LOIS E 3107 INDIGOBUSH WAY 7333009726 AUGHENBAUGH, JACK ELLEN F BORAN 1536 MARSH WREN LANE 7333007663 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 7333007304 SUCCOP II, LAWRENCE N 1331 NOBLE HERON WAY 47790026784 GRAHAM PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENTS LLC 1427 W 86TH ST STE 321 7333007621 H L CHILCUTT FL HOUSE TRU 1334 NOBLE HERON WAY 79840000547 SMITH, NICHOLAS V=& JEAN 1712 VENEZIA WAY 7333009221 WENK, JOSEPH R=& CAROL L 1573 MARSH WREN LN 7333009302 KEESHAN, LYNN 38 PARK AVE 7333009784 RING JR, JOHN H=& NORA E 1548 MARSH WREN LN 7333007265 M DOUGLAS DUNN QPR TRL 1339 NOBLE HERON WAY 47790026946 SCOTT, BEN C=& JACQUELIN 1952 FORT HARRODS DR 7333007281 C R WILMOT PERSONAL RES WILMOT, JAMES R=& CYNTH134 MUIRFIELD CT 7333009645 GRAY, PATRICK M=& PATRIC 1520 MARSH WREN LANE 7333007647 ROBERT BRUCE KERR TRUST 1047 SKYVALLEY CIRCLE 47790026726 MARBRY HOLDINGS LLC 1986 SEWARD AVE 47790027068 GATWARD, JOHN A=& SUSA12250 SILVER PALM PL 7333007320 SKINNER TR, C MICKEY PNC BANK NA TR JEAN M SKINNER REV TRUST 7333007388 JOE PREGONT REV TRUST TINA PREGONT REV TRUST #: PO BOX 471 7333009386 CORWIN, PHILIP=& JANE LEU 5151 ROCKLEDGE DR 79840000084 SHOAF, MARGERY W 1709 VENEZIA WAY 7333007809 BRUNO, THEODORE J=& DIA 1368 NOBLE HERON WAY 79840000301 OVERSTALL, ANN D LONGACRE CHESTNUT AVE ST GEORGES HILL 7333007207 CATTLIFF, ROGER=& ROSEM,1351 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333007702 CHRISTOPHER J LAPAN LIV TI J J RODRIGUEZ-VILLALOBOS L 1350 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333007566 THOMAS E ROBINSON REV T ELIZABETH F ROBINSON REV - 21 W HUGHES ST 7333009661 FISHER, BARRY M=& CHERYL 1524 MARSH WREN LANE 79840000327 PIRNAK, LARRY 1727 VENEZIA WAY 7333009700 THOMAS J ITRICH DECL OF T DONNA LEE ITRICH DECL OF 11532 MARSH WREN LANE 79840000343 WALKER, DONNIE W=& MAF 1731 VENEZIA WAY 7333009441 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 7333009629 WOLFGRUBER, KURT 59 BOYESEN RD 7333007508 DARDANI, THOMAS E_& DOI 1310 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333009409 AIELLI, FABRIZIO=& INGRID k 1533 MARSH WREN LN 7333007100 HAWN JR, GEORGE S=& HELI 1369 NOBLE HERON WAY 77089000685 COLEMAN, ELAINE J 2234 ABERDEEN COURT 7333007346 STOLZE, JAMES M=& PATTIE 1323 NOBLE HERON WAY 79840000466 FALSO, ADOLPH V=& BARBA 1730 VENEZIA WAY 25340000185 KANE, MICHAEL P=& KATHLE 2825 CAPISTRANO WAY 53220001027 LA RESIDENCES AT GREY OAf LTD PARTNERSHIP 76925000481 CATHERINE G MCKAY REV TF 2216 MIRAMONTE CT 3200 BAILEY LN STE 117 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1447 7333009467 LEMON INVESTMENTS LLC 2338 IMMOKALEE RD #324 79840000246 RUNG, CRAIG M=& NANETTE 1750 VENEZIA CT 47790023567 WEBER, STEVEN H=& NANCti48 HEMLOCK PARK DR 7333007540 KIEHI, WILLIAM J=& SHARON 1318 NOBLE HERON WAY 79840000288 HAGERMAN, MARK F 510 W WASHINGTON BLVD 79840000068 ANDERSON TR, JEFFREY R JEFFREY R ANDERSON LIV/TR UTD 10/8/96 76925000384 NAVIKAS, DAVID=& MARIE 2221 MIRAMONTE CT 7333007362 HOWARD G STACKER REV TF % FREDRIKSON & BYRON 1319 NOBLE HERON WAY 47790026962 FORBES, GENE M=& PATTY L PO BOX 1826 76925000902 JENKINS, WILLIAM A=& MAP 2199 MIRAMONTE WAY 79840000563 RITTER, MICHAEL C=& SUSAI PO BOX 1336 76925000407 KAREN J CORSO REV TRUST 1439 HARVEST CROSSING DR 47790023486 WOOD, WENDY SILLS 3254 SEDGE PL 76925000368 GARY LEE BLAIR REV TRUST SHEILA KAYE BLAIR REV TRUS 2225 MIRAMONTE CT 47790023127 FASOLD, PATRICIA 65 STARBOARD REACH 76925000889 HIGHTOWER, JAMES ALAN CHERYL WHITE HIGHTOWER 19 HIALEAH DRIVE 25340000169 LISTON, BRIAN=& VASILIKI 144 HILLCREST AVE 47790023460 EMILIE W MCCABE REV TRU.3250 SEDGE PL 76925000928 OPP LTD 2203 MIRAMONTE WAY 7333009483 LEHMKUHL, LARRY=& DARLE 1517 MARSH WREN LANE 7333003049 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333007401 MCNICHOLAS, JOHN T=& NA 1311 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333007485 STEVEN ROSENTHAL QPR TR CYNTHIA J ROSENTHAL QPR T 1306 NOBLE HERON WAY 79840000042 DONOGHUE, MICHAEL A=& 11701 VENEZIA WAY 47790026742 STRIANO, ROBERT E_& JANE 22 DEER RIDGE TRL 7333009807 TARANO, MANUEL=& EDDIS 97 PINE HILL RD 76925000067 MIRAMONTE AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 76925000300 MAHONEY, MICHAEL J CHRISTINE F MAHONEY 1101 LOCUST ST # 11 E 76925000326 SILVERSTEIN, MARTIN B ANDREE A HAAS 61 PROSPECT AVE 7333009425 LANZ TR, LISA KEARNS GERALD R LANZ TR LISA KEARNS LANZ TRUST 47790027084 KYLE, JOHN F=& JUDITH A 2246 SILVER PALM PL 7333009687 LORD, ALBERT L=& SUZANNE 1528 MARSH WREN LANE 76925000546 KETTLER, GORDON W=& FR/ 2228 MIRAMONTE CT 25340000208 NICHOLAS, ANTONIOS=& PA 2829 CAPISTRANO WAY 51999000348 BLEMASTER, GARY F=& JANE 2048 ISLA VISTA LN 7333009564 ANDERSON, ROBERT L=& JO, 1504 MARSH WREN LANE 25340000101 JUDY EST, LEONARD P % NICOLETTE H JUDY PR 2809 CAPISTRANO WAY 47790015106 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333007427 LE GRANDE, DOUGLAS R=& 11307 NOBLE HERON WAY 76925000342 SMITHPORT TRUST 1 LEWES CRESCENT 25340000282 FERRARI, RICHARD A=& SAN 2845 CAPISTRANO WAY 76925000504 FUREY, TIMOTHY R=& ELIZAI 28307 MALLARD DR 77089000203 BLACK, GREGORY S=& LINDA 2339 TRADITIONS CT 76925000520 SEGHI, ALBERT B=& SHARON 2224 MIRAMONTE CT 77089000180 PAWLOWSKI BONITA BAY TP 2335 TRADITIONS CT 7333009506 STAMOS, JAMES A=& MARTI 1513 MARSH WREN LN 25340000127 GOLDIN, RALPH S=& TINA C 2813 CAPISTRANO WAY 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1448 9.D.7 79840000521 BONCOSKY ET AL, DAVID 5245 N NEW JERSEY ST 25340000143 RYDER, DAVID ROSS JAN HARTLEY RYDER 2817 CAPISTRANO WAY 76925000601 FRISICARO, ANTHONY J DIANE S FRISICARO 42 BECKFORD CT 47790023509 SAUER, BRADLEY T=& NANC` 3258 SEDGE PLACE 79840000149 GANTOS, DAVID T 1751 VENEZIA CT 76925000944 JOHN P PEARL REV TRUST 600 E HIGH POINT RD 77089000245 JANIEL L DAYTON REV LIV TR 2347 TRADITION CT 7333003023 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790023347 MICHAEL FITZPATRICK INVT 4 KRAFTWOOD PL RR#1 47790028520 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY Sl 47790023363 COLLINS, JOANNE C 1380 SPRINGTON LN 7333007443 JOYCE, ROBERT J=& BONNIE 1303 NOBLE HERON WAY 47790023444 MOWATT, THOMAS A=& DIS 3246 SEDGE PL 47790026768 SAN TIVA II LP 130 BLOOR STREET WEST STE 905 7333007469 WRIGHT, IAN M=& SHARON 915 FEARRINGTON POST 25340000266 WAYLAND JR, JAMES JACKSC RENAE FUTNELL WAYLAND 2841 CAPISTRANO WAY 77089000229 NIES REVOCABLE TRUST 2343 TRADITIONS CT 76925000287 STEEL, IAN R=& TERRINA THE RIDINGS 27 TONGDEAN AVENUE 25340000088 TARANTINO, RONALD M LEIGH ANNE TARANTINO 2805 CAPISTRANO WAY 47790026988 SWAIN, CLARE L 2266 SILVER PALM PL 47790027042 WHEELER, ROBERT J=& SALL 2254 SILVER PALM PL 7333009522 NORMAN, WILLIAM P 1509 MARSH WREN LN 76925000465 FRANZ, WILLIAM G=& LORA 2212 MIRAMONTE CT 76925012547 HEFFNER, CAROLYNE 2142 TORINO WAY 77089000627 REILLY, EDWARD T 9 STONT PT 25340000305 YOUNG, ROBERT D=& KAREf 2849 CAPISTRANO WAY 79840000220 FREDRICKSON, BRUCE E_& K 1754 VENEZIA CT 47790027026 LENNON TR, ROBERT R ROBERT R LENNON TRUST 8832 SILVER OAK COVE 76925000588 M WERCHEK LLC 2202 MIRAMONTE WAY 77089000601 R MULHOLLAND REV LIV TRL C MULHOLLAND REV LIV TRU PO BOX 24 76925000261 NOLTE, JAMES E_& LAURA S 2245 MIRAMONTE CT 76925000245 MARTINEZ, LUIS FABIO LUIS FRANCISCO MARTINEZ FABIO HUGO MARTINEZ 76925000423 KANTOR, STANLEY WOLFE=82213 MIRAMONTE CT 7333009603 GENUARDI, JAMES V=& DEBI 1509 LATCHSTRING LN 51999000322 OLIVER, DIJANA 56 KENSINGTON AVENUE 76925000562 SHUCART, JAMES CHRISTOPI ROCHELLE C SHUCART 2232 MIRAMONTE CT 25340000240 JOHNS, DAVID L=& CHRISTIN4772 SHIRE RIDGE RD E 76925000627 CASA DE NAPLES LLC 9000 CONGRESSIONAL PKWY 25340000321 MARINO, JOSEPH W MARGUERITE M MARINO 2853 CAPISTRANO WAY 77089000261 E J & C F BARRETT FAMILY TF 2351 TRADITIONS CT 76925000449 DAVID W POWELL FAMILY TI 2209 MIRAMONTE CT 79840000440 DECKER, JOSEPH C=& NANN12980 DEVONSHIRE RD 79840000369 BIRNHAK, SHELDON E ROBIN S BIRNHAK 1735 VENEZIA WAY 79840000482 VANDEMARK, DIRK A=& PHY 118 ROXBURY PARK 47790023428 J DAVID HUBER REV TRUST BARBARA L HUBER REV TRUS 3242 SEDGE PL 77089000287 KRUPP, LESTER F=& PATRICK 2355 TRADITIONS CT 47790023389 HARRILL, S MICHAEL JENNIFER A KAHN 3234 SEDGE PLACE Packet Pg. 1449 79840000505 HARRINGTON, RICHARD J=& 1720 VENEZIA WAY 47790023525 BLUM, DAVID=& JANET 2292 DRURY LANE 47790023583 YON, MICHAEL M MARY A YON 3274 SEDGE PL 7333009580 LEACH, JERRY B=& ELEANOR 1508 MARSH WREN LN 51999000144 MANGAN, MICHAEL D=& KIIN 2041 ISLA VISTA LN 76925000740 PAMELA F CLAYSON REV TRL 2170 MIRAMONTE WAY 47790027000 GARRAND, ROBERT W=& DE 2262 SILVER PALM PL 47790023541 FLASKA, MARTIN J=& ELISSA 3266 SEDGE PL 79840000204 FOX, THOMAS H=& CLAIRE A 1758 VENEZIA CT 79840000181 MARTINI, DAWN M 1759 VENEZIA CT 79840000424 JOHN G GONIS 1979 TRUST 1738 VENEZIA WAY 79840000408 BURKE, ROBERT E_& TERESA 2 OREGON HOLLOW 79840000385 3944719 CANADA INC 1739 VENEZIA WAY 51999000364 RABINOWITZ, JACK Z=& ANN 23 AUDUBON LN 25340000389 KENNEY, WILLIAM J=& DIAN 315 BALTUSTROL CIR 47790023402 RATTNER TR, KENNETH L REBECCA RATTNER TR 76925007028 SMART, DUNCAN N=& AMAITHE ELMS 51999000542 MICHETTI TR, MICHAEL L LAUREN T MICHETTI TR 79840000165 HANNSZ, JOHN E_& JANICE E 1755 VENEZIA CT 76925007044 PARRINI, DANTE C=& BREND 1410 BRITTANY DR 47790028546 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 79840000262 WALLING, STEPHEN J 1746 VENEZIA CT 25340000460 NAVARRE, ROBERT W=& BAI 2816 CAPISTRANO WAY 25340000347 COSTELLO, CHARLES W=& C) 2857 CAPISTRANO WAY 51999000306 WILLIAM W SNYDER REV LIV 100 S BRENTWOOD BLVD STE 51999000487 MINUTELLA JR TR, JOHN A JOANNE FLORIA TR 77089000300 RAVITZ, ROBERT A MURIEL RAVITZ 77089001383 FERGUSON, MATTHEW W=81013 KETTERING PL 47790023305 SCHLESINGER, SAMUEL B ARLENE M SCHLESINGER 47790023282 RIZZI, EDYCE B=& JOHN L 105 PLATINUM PL 79840000123 CADIEUX, MARY MARTIN 1747 VENEZIA CT 25340000444 MEYER, ROBERT L=& EFFIE J 2822 CAPISTRANO WAY 47790023266 LINDA GOSS REV TRUST 28121 OAKLANDS CIR 7333009548 GUY W LEWIS REV TRUST 1505 MARSH WREN LN 51999000461 TARNOW, DENNIS P=& KARE 2024 ISLA VISTA LN 76925000643 SIEGEL, NORBERT K 2190 MIRAMONTE WAY 51999000160 GROSS, JOSEPH S=& URSULA 5 PARK PL APT 719 79840000107 URREA, OSCAR=& DIANA 4270 MUIRFIELD CIR 7333008141 PHILP, IAN IRIS PHILP 7333008167 SARDAR, ZAHEER M=& KARY 690 S RIDGE RD K L & R R RATTNER REV TRU. BACON END MICHAEL L MICHETTI REV TE ARTICLE FOUR RESIDUAL TR 2350 TRADITIONS CT 3218 SEDGE PL 1474 ANHINGA PT 7333008109 LB ESTUARY LLC 2210 VANDERBILT BEACH RD STE 1300 7333008125 KLEIN, ANSGAR=& MONIKA IN DER REHWIESE 3 77089001008 BLOOMFIELD, ALAN F=& NAI 2260 RESIDENCE CIR 7333008183 LEJEUNE, LAURENCE F=& JE/ 630 LOCUST HILLS DR 76925000724 PETER & LEE BEWLEY REV TF 2174 MIRAMONTE WAY 51999000186 DESPAIN TR, GLORIA A=& JA GLORIA A DESPAIN DECL OF 1 UTD 11/24/99 76925000863 TILSON, SHAWN TOWNLEY DALE ANN TILSON 4012 LANTERN LN 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1450 25340000224 PESTILLO, PETER DEBRA SCHINDLER 2833 CAPISTRANO WAY 7333008086 HOWARD L CHILCUTT TRUST 1334 NOBLE HERON WAY 76925007060 UHLIG, RICHARD ALLEN JANET LEE UHLIG 2146 TORINO WAY 51999000500 WAGGONER, FRANK M 2016 ISLA VISTA LN 47790023321 NOLAN, JAMES P=& MARGA 3222 SEDGE PL 47790023169 BOYD, LOUIS J=& PAMELA A 3123 INDIGOBUSH WAY 7333008280 LORI S FERNANDES REV TRU' RICHARD J FERNANDES REV T 1465 ANHINGA PT 7333008303 RANDAL E GOLDEN REV TRU 19800 W 8 MILE RD 7333008361 WENDY R WILSON REV TRUS 1481 ANHINGA PT 7333008329 LB ESTUARY LLC 2210 VANDERBILT BEACH RD STE 1300 7333008345 DANTUS, STEVEN M=& SUSP 1477 ANHINGA PT 51999000283 OWENS, BRIAN J=& SHARON 2060 ISLA VISTA LN 77089000083 VILLAS OF TRADITIONS AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNERS.4 % SENTRY MGMT, INC 76925000782 BETTE E BILTON REV TRUST 72 BRINKER RD 7333008387 ELAINE M WILLIAMS TRUST 1485 ANHINGA PT 51999000128 HANSON TR, MELANIE J MELANIE J HANSON REV/TR UTD 1/11/01 7333008264 TRIPP TR, RAYMOND D LINDA M TRIPP TR R D & L M TRIPP REV TRUST 76925000847 GLEBA, PAUL F=& BEVERLY 2187 MIRAMONTE WAY 47790028229 PETRETTA, ANTHONY L=& Al' 1618 CHINABERRY WAY 47790028245 HORN BUCKLE, MERTROE B DONNA T HORNBUCKLE 1614 CHINABERRY WAY 47790028203 EDWARDS, WILLIAM H PATRICIA C EDWARDS 1622 CHINABERRY WAY 51999000526 MARK E FIEBRINK REV TRUS- 2012 ISLA VISTA LN 25340000363 REYNOLDS, ROYCE=& JANE � 2702 LAKE FOREST DR 47790026205 BURKE, ROBERT W=& DONN 2359 ALEXANDER PALM DR 47790026124 SUSAN E SWOPE TRUST %THE GLENVIEW TRUST CO 4969 US HWY 42, STE 2000 47790027783 BATES, EUN-HEE 1613 CHINABERRY WAY 47790027767 1609 CHINABERRY WAY LLC % GWEN BAUER 5701 HARBOUR RIDGE RD 47790027806 TEHAN, JOHN B=& REGINA,4 85 BROMPTON RD 47790026182 MARGARET T CARRICK RES T P 0 BOX 468 47790026425 HICKS JR, GEORGE L=& SUSA 2362 ALEXANDER PALM DR 47790026140 FRUSCELLA, FRED A=& BARB 5750 LIBERTY RD 47790027822 CAVALUZZI, CAROL A 1621 CHINABERRY WAY 51999000380 BORON TR, GREGORY F SUZANNE M BORON TR GREGORY F BORON QPR TRI 47790026221 CYNTHIA K HENNING REV TR 2355 ALEXANDER PALM DR 47790026263 PRICE, GERALD VINCENT BARBARA LYNN PRICE 57 WATERLOO ST 51999000429 CLARK, CAROL S 2032 ISLA VISTA LN 47790028148 STEPHEN ST ANGELO JR TRU 1636 CHINABERRY WAY 7333008206 ANHINGA POINTE LAND TRU 1460 ANHINGA PT 47790028261 WRIGHT, ROBERT A & CATHI 1610 CHINABERRY WAY 47790026289 CAROL M BOOSE TRUST 4N657 HIDDEN OAKS RD 47790099685 GRANGER, STEPHEN J=& CYP 1903 COCOPLUM WAY 47790026166 SHAFFER, BYRON=& SALLY A 2367 ALEXANDER PALM DR 47790026247 A J INNAMARATO REV LIV TF 2351 ALEXANDER PALM DR 47790026441 LYNGAAS, JOHN V LINDA C NOEL 76925000708 DANIEL H SHAPIRA FAM TRU 80 WOODLAND RD 47790027848 MAGRATH, TERRENCE B PATRICE MCKENNEY 7333008222 DIEMER TRUST 10380 TECUMSEH RD EAST 2366 ALEXANDER PALM DR 1625 CHINABERRY WAY 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1451 47790028180 WILLIAMS JR, VAN ZANDT WILLIAMS, MYRA N 1626 CHINABERRY WAY 7333008248 MANCHEN, CRAIG=& DONN) 1457 ANHINGA PT 47790099669 E F & S V LOGGHE TRUST 1907 COCOPLUM WAY 25340000402 OLSEN, THOMAS G BOOSALIS, MARY H 524 WALNUT SPRINGS DR 47790026409 MORLEY, LINDA W 2358 ALEXANDER PALM DR 76925000766 BARBARA M KENTY TRUST 8420 WEMBLEY CT 47790027149 BOYSON, ROBERT W=& PRU 2234 SILVER PALM PL 47790028164 WILLIAMS, DAVID J=& MARY 1632 CHINABERRY WAY 51999000267 WHITTEMORE, JOHN A=& C/ 2064 ISLA VISTA LANE 51999000445 BAYER TR, CAROL C=& RONA CAROL C BAYER REV TRUST/2 UTD 4/12/06 47790023240 CARMEN L GRIGSBY TRUST 3206 SEDGE PL 25340000486 MRS REVOCABLE TRUST 2810 CAPISTRANO WAY 47790023208 STROM, SUSAN LEE 34 HICKORY MEADOW RD 47790099481 BOBROW, RICHARD S 1928 COCOPLUM WAY 51999000403 CYNTHIA SCOTT REVOCABLE 18650 BEARPATH TRAIL 76925000669 MEDOL LLC 2186 MIRAMONTE WAY 47790026548 LONG, DAVID J=& JUDITH T 2390 KING PALM WAY 47790026483 MENEFEE, EDWARD=& SHIRI 2378 KING PALM WAY 47790026506 DAVID J PARSONS REV TRUS" 2382 KING PALM WAY 76925000685 KRONE, ANDREW J=& BARB/ 2182 MIRAMONTE WAY 47790026302 RICK, THOMAS W=& LINDA P 2339 ALEXANDER PALM DR 47790099342 G E RICHMOND 2006 IRREV - % AL BRENNAN TR 737 N MICHIGAN AVE 76925000821 TILSON 2012 FAMILY TRUST 46 PARK LANE CIR 76925000805 RANKIN, MARK A=& MAURE 2179 MIRAMONTE WAY 47790027864 POUND, LEO=& SONJA 1629 CHINABERRY WAY 51999000102 L W MONTANARO 2014 IRRE 2033 ISLA VISTA LANE 47790001602 CUSICK, THOMAS A 2633 BULRUSH LANE 47790001709 ALEXANDER, DON H=& CHRI 2642 BULRUSH LN 47790001589 SHARON MOON REVOCABLE 26 WOODLAWN AVE 47790022429 SPINELLI, WILLIAM 2948 BELLFLOWER LN 47790022487 RECHTER, RICHARD P MARILYN RECHTER 2936 BELLFLOWER LN 47790022461 BOYD, BRETJ=& URSULA 2940 BELLFLOWER LN 47790017201 ARTHUR H BUNN TRUST BOX 4465 47790017256 STANHOPE, JOHN E_& MARI 2820 TARFLOWER WAY 47790099504 FUGA FAMILY TRUST 7 FAIRFIELD PLACE 47790001107 JOHN J HENNESSEY IRREV TR AUDREY T HENNESSEY QPR T 2500 SPICEBUSH LN 47790015355 HUTCHINSON, PHILLIP M=& 29 WHITTLES WAY 47790001123 MCBRIDE, GERALD=& TARYN 2504 SPICEBUSH LN 47790001149 KAPOR TR, LEO CORINNE KAPOR TR CORINNE KAPOR REV TRUST 47790015504 TEPAS, THOMAS G=& DEBRA 2720 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790001165 COHEN TR, JANET G 2512 SPICEBUSH LN 51999000209 FROSCHLE, CHARLES=& JOAP 2055 ISLA VISTA LN 47790001864 GRANGER, THOMAS D=& ELI 2610 BULRUSH LANE 47790026522 J R & J M POLLOCK REV TRU! 2386 KING PALM WAY 47790016804 BONTEMS TR, KATHLEEN T KATHLEEN T BONTEMS TRUS- 2814 THISTLE WAY 47790001547 STEVEN B SILL REVOCABLE T 9150 PILLSBURY AVE S 47790022607 SCOTT A SMITH LIVING TRUE 2912 INDIGOBUSH WAY 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1452 9.D.7 47790000823 TREVELONI, CATHERINE D 2410 CHICORY LN 47790001000 LANDIS, HOWARD C 72 LOGAN RD 47790001725 BARTLETT, MARK S=& KAREP 2638 BULRUSH LN 47790016354 JOHNSON II, GRAYSEN P PERSEPHONE S JOHNSON 2709 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790022500 2932 BELLFLOWER LANE REALTY TRUST 82 BACON ST 47790099520 WHITE, DAVID R=& JOANNE 1936 COCOPLUM WAY 47790001026 JOHN GILBERT COX LIVING T 559 CONCORD RD 51999000568 STANANOUGHT, COLIN LESLIE JANE STANANOUGHT 2004 ISLA VISTA LANE 47790028041 PATRICIA LEIPZIG REV TRUST 1645 CHINABERRY WAY 47790015559 OLEJAR, THOMAS M=& PATF 2724 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790022306 HAYS TR, BRENDA S BRENDA S HAYS REV TRUST 47790001505 FLAGG, MARTHA WARD FLAT CLINTON DAGGETT FLAGG 47790027903 MOMTAZEE, SAM 1654 CHINABERRY CT 47790001482 SCOTT, MARILYN 602-8 SULTAN ST 47790001466 JACQUELINE H MARTIN REV 2509 SPICEBUSH LN 47790022445 VAN GELDEREN, LOUIS=& JA 7 SOUTH 459 DONWOOD DR 47790001343 2094043 ONTARIO INC 10 WEYBOURNE CRESCENT 47790001369 BLOKSMA, HENDRIK F=& ELF 2529 DAY LILY PL 47790001563 CARP, LINDA N 2625 BULRUSH LN 47790021200 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790001042 ANAPOL, MICHAEL 1=& MER' 2423 INDIAN PIPE WAY 47790026344 HELDRETH, DOUGLAS D=& R 6676 STONEGATE DRIVE 47790001068 REBECCA S MARTELL TRUST 2419 INDIAN PIPE WAY 47790016309 PAWLOWSKI BONITA BAY TF 2812 TARFLOWER WAY 47790026328 AIN, ARON=& SUSAN 255 FULLER ST 47790016257 ALLEN, CHARLENE A 2717 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790028928 MILLER, PAUL DAVID=& M R 3118 DAHLIA WAY 47790028902 COGGINS FAMILY LLC 1220 BRENTFORD LN 47790021543 JOSEPH A MARX TRUST 2823 SILVERLEAF LN 47790000849 SMITH, ARTHUR L=& LOLA L 2414 CHICORY LN 47790022623 LIPITZ, FLORA E 2908 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790001741 STOCK, MICHAEL A=& HEIDI 2634 BULRUSH LN 47790028025 DUPREEZ, HUGO D=& ELIZAF 1641 CHINABERRY WAY 47790015452 SHORT JR, H DREXEL LAURA MILLER -SHORT 47790017052 WATZINGER, GERHARD A=& 2821 TARFLOWER WAY 47790160048 SPROUL, KATHERINE G 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 2943 BELLFLOWER LN 2501 SPICEBUSH LN 2716 BUCKTHORN WAY 77089000041 VILLAS OF TRADITIONS AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNERS A % SENTRY MGMT, INC 47790015407 LIPPERT, L DOUGLAS=& MAF 2712 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790027945 RILEY, CHRISTOPHER, M=& N 1659 CHINABERRY CT 47790029008 HOGAN, PATRICK J=& PATRI(3102 DAHLIA WAY 47790160420 FRANCES W LETHAM TRUST 2108 CANNA WAY 51999000241 EDELMANN, ANDREW P PATRICIA B EDELMANN 2063 ISLA VISTA LN 47790038989 BERTHA M HUFF TRUST 10 CAMBRIDGE DR 47790016202 SUSAN K SLOAN REV TRUST 2721 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790001806 SCHOEWE FAMILY TRUST KAREN K SCHOEWE REV TRU! 2622 BULRUSH LN 47790028083 FINIZIO TR, TOBIN A=& JANI(TOBIN A FINIZIO REV TRUST JANICE M FINIZIO REV TRUS- 47790160080 DIERMEIER, JEFFREY J DIERMEIER, JULIA M 2113 CANNA WAY Packet Pg. 1453 47790016901 JONES, DONALD T=& PHYLLI: 2809 TARFLOWER WAY 47790001385 TOMAINI, SANTO=& LISA M 2525 DAY LILY PL 47790015300 DICERBO II, LOUIS P=& EILEE 33 CHAPEL ROAD 47790001440 L DICK BUELL TRUST 2513 SPICEBUSH LN 47790028106 FALTER, JACALYN 1644 CHINABERRY WAY 47790039001 MANGAN, MICHAEL D=& KII� 2041 ISLA VISTA LANE 47790021763 FARR TR, WILLIAM JOYCE ANN FARR TR FARR FMLY LAND TRUST 47790099643 CHARLES S WOLANDE REV TI 1911 COCOPLUM WAY 47790001767 KWON, DOUGLAS S=& SUSA17 OLD FARMS RD 47790015601 SUZANNE PALONE TRUST 2728 BUCKTHORN WAY 25340000428 DAVID R FRAUENSHUH REV - 7101 W 78TH ST STE 100 47790160064 EITEL, CHARLES ROY CYNTHIA MCDOUGAL EITEL 2109 CANNA WAY 47790015258 FAMILY TRUST FOR CHILDRE 2700 BUCKTHORN WAY 7333003081 VICKI L CAPADONA GST-EXEf 7333011028 ATTERBURY, ANDREW L 1376 GREAT EGRET TRAIL 47790022241 PIKE, JANICE L 7333011002 ATTERBURY, ANDREW L 1376 GREAT EGRET TRAIL 7333011222 SILVERSTEIN, MARTIN B 7333011044 SELIGMAN, GREGORY 20 EGLINTON AVE WEST STE 1306 7333011141 AGOSTINO, VINCENT CYNTHIA M AGOSTINO 1205 GORDON RIVER TRL 47790001783 NANCY L WILSON TRUST 2626 BULRUSH LN 7333010906 CIVERA, EDWARD S=& JUDIT 1249 GORDON RIVER TRL 7333010883 FAMILY FIVE ONE LLC 2227 CHARLES LANE 7333003340 KINZENBAW TR, JON E MARCIA A KINZENBAW TR JON E KINZENBAW REV TRU: 7333010922 MICHAEL K GRIMM REV TRU 1245 GORDON RIVER TRL 7333003366 SHULMAN, STEVEN JAY ELLEN LEIFER SHULMAN 1433 NIGHTHAWK POINT 7333010689 1234 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 120 EGLINTON AVE WEST BOX 2059 STE 1306 7333010485 DEBRA MAFFEO REVOCABLE 8220 CRESTWOOD HEIGHTS [ APT #1902 7333010401 WALKER, JUERGEN HEINZ SIGRID WALTRAUD WALKER 1267 OSPREY TRL 7333010964 RICHARD K LUBLIN REV TRU! 1237 GORDON TRAIL 7333010346 MALECKAR, TOD G=& DIANA 1268 OSPREY TRAIL 7333010320 EHLERS, HERBERT E_& MAR` 1272 OSPREY TRL 47790022526 LISA RENEE GURSOY REV TRl 2928 BELLFLOWER LN 7333003324 DAVIDSON, ROBERT M LYNN M YAEGER 1425 NIGHTHAWK PT 7333003188 JANE L BAINUM DECL OF TR18171 MAPLE LAWN BLVD #3i 7333003104 GOLDMAN, NEAL D=& ANGE 1448 NIGHT HAWK PT 7333010948 MICHAEL J MCCABE REV TRL MARY M MCCABE REV TRUST PO BOX 10069 7333011248 MARINO, V JAMES=& MARY 1208 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 47790021488 STEPHEN L KAUFFMAN REV - 2805 SILVERLEAF LN 7333010265 ANN H JOHNSON REV TRUST 1284 OSPREY TRL 7333010427 JOHNSON, J CLIFFORD MARY ANN JOHNSON 1271 OSPREY TRAIL 7333003081 VICKI L CAPADONA GST-EXEf RESIDENCE TRUST 1452 NIGHTHAWK POINTE 47790022241 PIKE, JANICE L 2931 BELLFLOWER LN 7333011222 SILVERSTEIN, MARTIN B ANDREE A HAAS 61 PROSPERT AVE 47790028122 NURMI, THOMAS D MARGUERITE ELAINE NURMI 3025 UNIVERSITY TER NW 47790028588 JANET W MARTIN TRUST 3105 DAHLIA WAY 7333003382 MCCLUTCHY JR, JOHN H=& J 11 MOLLY LN 7333003447 PUOPOLO, KEVIN G=& MAR(1449 NIGHTHAWK POINT 7333003162 EHLERT, CJAMES=& MARILY 1292 S FALCON DR 7333003421 SHEEHY, DONALD R=& PEGG 1445 NIGHTHAWK PT 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1454 7333003405 STEVENS, DAVID D=& DEBOF 1441 NIGHTHAWK PT 7333003146 PODOWSKI, CHARLES H CHARLOTTE A PODOWSKI 7333003120 JOHNSON, GREGORY L KATHLEEN M JOHNSON 7333010760 DORSEY, JAMES F=& MARY J 1248 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 47790027929 CROSSMAN JR, HOWARD F 1658 CHINABERRY CT 47790099627 SAAD JR, SAMUEL J=& FAHAI 1915 COCOPLUM WAY 7333010508 GOODRUM, WILLIAM J CATHERINE T GOODRUM 7333010207 COLE, THOMAS W=& KIM 969 PARK AVE APT 5D 47790028067 GILBERT, ROY H 1649 CHINABERRY WAY 47790099423 NAQUIN, MARY E 1941 COCOPLUM CT 7333003308 BARONE, BRUCE M=& NANC 1421 NIGHTHAWK PT 7333000165 STREIBICH, CYNTHIA 50 EAST MAPLE AVE 7333000149 SMITH, BRYAN L=& JUDITH E 1395 GREAT EGRET TRL 7333010304 HERBERT E EHLERS TRUST 1272 OSPREY TRL 1440 NIGHTHAWK POINTE 1444 NIGHTHAWK PT 1287 OSPREY TRAIL 47790001628 RINKENBERGER, JAMES A MARCIA R RINKENBERGER 2637 BULRUSH LANE 7333000369 MICHAEL T DUKE TRUST M SUSAN DUKE TRUST 1392 GREAT EGRET TRL 7333010867 D H GORDON RIVER LLC 1261 GORDON RIVER TRL 47790001848 R A WEBER TRUST FOR HUSE 2614 BULRUSH LN 77089000122 CCC TRADITIONS LLC 2020 SALZEDO STREET SUITE #200 7333010469 CHABRAJA, NICHOLAS D=& E 1279 OSPREY TRL 7333010980 ALLEN, CAROLE VENUS 1235 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 76925012042 TORINO AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 7333003463 GRENZ TR, RODNEY G ROD G GRENZ REV TRUST M KAY GRENZ TR 51999000225 JONES, CLAYTON M=& DEBC 2059 ISLA VISTA LN 7333010281 PATRICIA D KNOFF REV TRU! 11121 BLUESTEM LANE 7333010249 MESSEY TR, GLORIA MILLS ROBERT JOHN MESSEY TR 1288 OSPREY TRL 7333011060 LOUIS TURSI JR REV TRUST 1221 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 7333010388 SUMEREL, ROBERT B=& SALI ROBERT B SUMEREL TR SALLIE D SUMEREL TR 7333010443 HALLIDAY FAMILY PROPERT) 344 CRYSTAL BAY DR 47790022322 SUSAN L DALTON REV TRUS12947 BELLFLOWER LN 7333003201 SMALLWOOD JR, JOSEPH C MARY BRENNAN SMALLWOC 1428 NIGHTHAWK PT 47790028944 KENT ARENDS 1998 IRREVO(CHILDREN'S TRUST 2004 LONGWOOD LN 47790026386 LAUNDER, JACQUELINE O'TC 2354 ALEXANDER PALM DR 7333010223 SUSAN R SILER FAMILY TRUS 1292 OSPREY TRL 47790028805 ALLEN, SANDRA CESPEDES 3142 DAHLIA WAY 7333010524 DRULEY, THOMAS F=& FRAN 1291 OSPREY TRL 7333000343 HART, GERARD J=& HEATHE13388 VIA LIDO PH2 7333003227 RITA E ROSSER 2004 REV TRI 1424 NIGHT HAWK PT 47790016406 MORRISON, ROBERT H=& SL 2705 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790000904 ENGLAND TR, JOSEPH W MARY JO ENGLAND TR JOSEPH W ENGLAND TRUST 7333000262 EGRETTRAILTRUST 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333011125 CANTERA, RICHARD D=& MP 1209 GORDON RIVER TRL 7333011329 CORWIN, PHILIP M=& JANE 15151 ROCKLEDGE DR 7333011280 TECHAR, FRANKLIN JAMES MARIA SOLEDAD TECHAR 1216 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 7333011264 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 7333011303 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD 4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 47790099601 GRUNER, RONALD H=& NAN 1919 COCOPLUM WAY 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1455 47790022542 ROBERT F MCDAVID III TRUS DEBORAH G MCDAVID TRUS12928 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790022665 MYERS, JERRY K=& CRYSTAL 2900 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790160129 ALLEN, DONALD 0=& PATRI(2121 CANNA WAY 47790099368 SCULLY, EDWARD R=& CARC 1908 COCOPLUM WAY 47790017609 CYNTHIA C COOPER REV TRL 2109 CANNA WAY 47790022649 DEANA STRINGER REVOCABl2904 INDIGOBUSH WAY 7333000385 SNIDER, JOHN K=& CAROLE 13 LOCH RIDGE COURT 47790026467 GUAY NAPLES IRREV TRUST 122 LISONALLY CT 47790038882 MOOREHEAD, STEVE=& PHY 1837 PLUMBAGO LANE 47790022186 RANALLI, ROBERT J=& ANN P 2923 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790028986 COOPER, RUSSELL LEE PAULA LEE COOPER 47790027961 CHINABERRY ONE LLC PO BOX 1700 47790000807 TAPPERT, GEORGE R=& JUDI 2406 CHICORY LN 47790022568 THOMAS, EUGENE H KATHLEEN M SHOCKLEY 47790001246 MARY RIFE JAMES TRUST 2507 DAY LILY PLACE 7333011206 SGL PROPERTIES LLC 1912 APPLE BLOSSOM DR 47790160103 C DAVID SHERRILL TRUST 2117 CANNA WAY 47790021527 MARSHA M BANSAVAGE TRI23 BINNEY RD 7333010702 BOBBY, THEODORE N 7333011109 PITTS, JAMES FRANKLIN 7333011086 GRT DEVELOPMENTS LLC MARY KATHRYN BOBBY 1213 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 3106 DAHLIA WAY 2922 INDIGOBUSH WAY 1236 GORDON RIVER TRL 2210 VANDERBILT BEACH RD STE 1300 47790017007 STEPHEN A CULLINAN TRUS12815 TARFLOWER WAY 47790021585 LINDA K DROOK FL QPR TRU: 2829 SILVERLEAF LN 25340000046 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNER'S ASSN INC PO BOX 110339 47790038727 GUTIERREZ, PHILIP L=& KIM 1060 NELSONS WALK 47790016451 DAVID L OSMENT TRUST 2701 BUCKTHORN WAY 7333003285 MACDUFF, CLYDE=& KELLY PO BOX 1200 47790022160 JEANNIE HARRIS MORAN LIV 2919 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790038701 PELAK FAMILY TRUST 1861 PLUMBAGO WAY 47790028847 FRITZ TR, EDNA M EDNA M FRITZ TRUST UTD 1/20/00 47790021569 MURRELL JR, HOWARD J=&! 2827 SILVERLEAF LN 47790028863 BRANDT, JOE R=& EMILY L 3130 DAHLIA WAY 47790028821 KEITH A HARROLD TRUST 4640 DUNROBIN DR NE 7333010540 PINCHEV, ALEX=& MICHELLE 1295 OSPREY TRL 47790021789 VAN OSS, THOMAS J=& BARE 2808 SILVERLEAF LANE 47790028009 JEAN, ROGER=& FRANCINE PO BOX 10360 47790028627 BOWERS, D STUART MARY V PERRY 47790028601 MCINTYRE, MARVIN=& JO Al 3111 DAHLIA WAY 47790021747 MYRA M FRIEDMAN REV TRI, 2816 SILVERLEAF LN 7333000204 HAGEMANN, FREDERICK W SUSAN C HAGEMANN 7333000181 RALPH E MIESEL TRUST 1385 GREAT EGRET TRL 47790021501 HOKANSON, STEPHEN P 2809 SILVERLEAF LN 47790000920 F S PFANNENSTIEHL TRUST JULIA S PFANNENSTIEHL 51999000089 DIANE MESSANA TRUST 2029 ISLA VISTA LN 47790017502 GOETZEIII, RANDLE M=& NA 3900 E MONUMENT ST 7333000220 BOUCHARD, CRAIG T=& MEL 1377 GREAT EGRET TRL 47790026360 MONKS, DONALD R=& DORC 34 PIPPINS WAY 3117 DAHLIA WAY 1381 GREAT EGRET TRAIL 81 BEACON ST 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1456 7333011345 MANCUSO, MICHAEL J=& PC 1226 GORDON RIVER TRAIL 7333010663 YOUNG, PETER M=& KELLY F 1346 NOBLE HERON WAY 7333000123 DUNCAN, THOMAS W=& M� 1397 GREAT EGRET TRL 7333000107 TURNER FAMILY TRUST 201] 1399 GREAT EGRET TRL 7333000408 THOMAS M SMYTHE FL P/R/ GRETA C SMYTHE FL P/R/T 1398 GREAT EGRET TRL 47790001220 STEVENS, BRUCE J=& SUSAN 2511 DAY LILY PL 47790022144 AGNES HALL REV TRUST 2915 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790160365 VERHELLE JR, WILLIAM HENF CYNDEE ANN VERHELLE 2140 CANNA WAY 47790038866 PULPIT RIDGE TRUST 77 KING ST WEST BOX 341, SUITE 4500 47790160349 ZAKMAN, DONALD E_& MAF 2148 CANNA WAY 47790001822 PRESTON TR, STEVEN P=& N STEVEN P & NEDRA A PRESTC NEDRA A PRESTON QPR TRL 47790022348 JANDERNOA, MICHAEL=& SL 171 MONROE AVE NW STE 4' 47790038743 MACKAY TR, RICHARD FRANCINE MACKAY TR MACKAY FAMILY TRUST 47790028889 SPALDING TR, CARL A=& DIA CARL A SPALDING SR R/L TRU DIANE M SPALDING R/L TRU 47790039027 SLMP LLC TRUST 2100 S WARSON RD 47790001644 FRICKS, WILLIAM P=& DEAN12641 BULRUSH LN 47790099465 DONALD M MILLER REV TRU 1924 COCOPLUM WAY 47790027880 GALLAGHER TR, CAROL ZAHARRIS TR, DRAKE C 47790028960 STAYER, LAURA 3110 DAHLIA WAY 47790001084 DAVID LESTER TRUST 14905 SPRINGVIEW RIDGE 47790099407 DEFRANCESCO, ADAM H=& 1942 COCOPLUM CT 47790021640 MILLS, J DAVID=& SHERRY D 2836 SILVERLEAF LN 47790160404 MORIARTY, JAMES J=& BREN 286 SHOREACRES RD 47790028643 STAVISH, MARK=& WENDY 3123 DAHLIA WAY 47790160323 SCHAWK, DAVID A=& TERYL 1089 GLENCREST DR 7333003243 HENDRIK A VERFAILLIE TRUS 1420 NIGHTHAWK PT 47790160381 SPONYOE, JOYCE 2124 CANNA WAY 47790160187 JOSEPH, THOMAS J=& CARO 2133 CANNA CT 47790016707 SAVORETTI, ANDREA K 2823 THISTLE WAY 47790022128 RYDER, DAVID R=& JAN HAIR 2909 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790099588 GOLDMAN TR, BENJAMIN A 1923 COCOPLUM WAY 47790021721 MCNAMARA, JAMES A=& BR 275 S ARLINGTON AVE 47790016752 CYNTHIA A BLOOMHALL REV 2818 THISTLE WAY 47790038921 HALSTATT LLC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY THE GALLAGHER FAMILT RE' 47790023224 WILSON, STEVEN A=& SHAR(PO BOX 649 47790017557 PAWLOWSKI TR, GLENN F GAYLE A ENGELS TR FRANK J PAWLOWSKI Q/P/R 47790017104 RICHARD P BELL REV TRUST 2825 TARFLOWER WAY 47790027987 AEGIS COMMCTN INVESTME 702-2285 LAKE SHORE BLVD' 47790001327 ECKENHOFF, EDWARD A=& J 2537 DAY LILY PL 7333000246 HOLBROOK, BRAD=& LORRA 36 STATION RD STANNINGTON 47790039043 RENNA, EUGENE A=& APRILF 1805 PLUMBAGO WAY 47790028685 JOHNSON, R SHELDON=& VII 3133 DAHLIA WAY 47790038840 DAVIS, MARK A=& NANCY J 1830 PLUMBAGO LN 47790001521 BILL R SANFORD TRUST 2617 BULRUSH LN 7333012043 ESTATE HOMES BY STOCK LL 2639 PROFESSIONAL CIR #1& 47790016600 WILCHER NAPLES TRUST 2811 THISTLE WAY 47790160268 MOSNER, LAWRENCE J=& JU 2149 CANNA WAY 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1457 9.D.7 47790099546 MCBRIDE, PAUL F CHRISTINA BETH MCBRIDE 7816 RUXWOOD RD 47790022364 KOOP, ALVIN=& ROBIN 242 LAKESHORE DR N 47790016150 ROVICK, ROGER L=& CAROL. 47790017159 BARTHOLOMEW, DOUGLAS JOYCE H BARTHOLOMEW 2828 TARFLOWER WAY 13804040101 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAG 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 1& 22712000020 AVILA AT GREY OAKS HOME(ASSOC INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MGM 22712000622 AVILA AT GREY OAKS HOME(ASSOC INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MGM 47790022209 AUGSBURY TR, IMOGEN S THOMAS E LAROSE TR FRANK A AUGSBURY JR GST - 47790160242 BAYLIN, JACK L=& GAIL B 2145 CANNA WAY 47790016859 RICHARD W BLACKBURN 20C 2806 THISTLE WAY 47790028669 FORD JR, HARRY M=& JOSEP 3129 DAHLIA WAY MARIA D FURMAN REV TRUS MARIA D FURMAN QPRT 47790015708 STRINGHAM, PETER E ALBERTA J MCLEOD-STRINGH 2736 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790001204 HARKINS, JOHN H=& CHERYL 2515 DAY LILY PL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIC C/O RESORT MANAGEMENT 7333003269 HEEBNER, DAVID K 1416 NIGHT HAWK PT 107 COVINGTON CT 47790028782 SHARON C DEWITT REV TRU; 3146 DAHLIA WAY 2517 SPICEBUSH LN 47790160307 SCHAPER, J JEFFREY=& COLL 2156 CANNA WAY 47790001408 JOHNSON, BRIAN D KATHERINE H JOHNSON 2521 DAY LILY PL 47790001660 STOUT, JIM=& CYNTHIA 2650 BULRUSH LN 47790000946 GOTSIS, WILLIAM 11 SUMMIT VIEW 47790023185 HALPERT, BURTON S=& LINE 1 VAUCLUSE LN 47790099384 JULIE C HOGAN LIV TRUST C/O INDUSTRY CONSULTING PO BOX 8265 47790160284 SHEPPARD, JEROME=& JOSE 2153 CANNA WAY 47790160145 JENSEN, JOHN S=& DEBRA A 2125 CANNA WAY 76925012026 TORINO AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 47790001181 POTTER, THOMAS A=& CAM 5060 BRIDLE PATH RD 47790038905 MASSARO, LOUIS L=& CAROI 1833 PLUMBAGO LN 47790160226 TRUMAN 2013 SC3 TITLE TRI 15480 LAGUNA CANYON RD 47790000988 WITTOCK, JULIE KENISTON 3463 PINE RIDGE RD 47790099562 JESSIE W MOBLEY REV TRUS' 1927 COCOPLUM WAY 7333010841 B H ESTUARY LLC 1261 GORDON RIVER TRL 47790017654 COPPERMAN, HAROLD D=& 2804 TARFLOWER WAY 77089000025 VILLAS OF TRADITONS AT GREY OAKES HOMEOWNERS % SENTRY MGMT, INC 47790016150 ROVICK, ROGER L=& CAROL. 2661 ARCOLA LN 47790016558 CAPISTRANO I TRUST HESTER, THOMAS P=& NANC' 2807 THISTLE WAY 47790021666 NICEWONDER, KENNETH DO NICEWONDER, ETTA M 148 BRISTOL EAST RD 47790021705 CONROY TR, CAROL A CAROL A CONROY REV TRUST MICHAEL D & TIMOTHY COP 7333010362 NANCY BORELLI REV TRUST 1264 OSPREY TRL 47790016503 WILSON JR, FREDERICK E 2803 THISTLE WAY 47790016859 RICHARD W BLACKBURN 20C 2806 THISTLE WAY 47790022584 JOHN A DUFFY REV TRUST MARIA D FURMAN REV TRUS MARIA D FURMAN QPRT 47790028708 SWIFT FAMILY TRUST 49 WINFIELD LANE 51999000047 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIC C/O RESORT MANAGEMENT 47790015902 MANOFSKY, CARL M=& KATI 107 COVINGTON CT 47790001424 MCGLINCHEY, JOSEPH D 2517 SPICEBUSH LN 47790022102 MCALOON, BRIAN=& MARY 2905 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790022089 SMITH JR, ROGER BERRY 2901 INDIGOBUSH WAY 47790016655 DAVID A SCHAWK 1998 TRU:1089 GLENCREST DR 47790160200 WESLEY, NANCY W CHARLES R WESLEY III 2137 CANNA CT 47790099449 DOLBEN, ALICE B 1937 COCOPLUM CT Packet Pg. 1458 47790016105 ALDRICH, SUSAN RAMSEY 2737 BUCKTHORN WAY 7333000288 ATTERBURY, ANDREW L GWYN A PRENTICE 1376 GREAT EGRET TRL 7333000327 MITCHELL, JAMES=& MARG/ 1380 GREAT EGRET TRL 47790015753 CHAMPION, JAMES K=& HIL[ 2740 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790038963 INMAN, WILLIAM J=& PATRI, 1821 PLUMBAGO WAY 47790000865 DETWEILER, CAROLE S=& JO 2418 CHICORY LN 47790028724 GLORE, JODIE K=& SANDRA 3141 DAHLIA WAY 47790160161 VAN OTTERLOO, EYK A ROSE MARIE VAN OTTERLOO 2129 CANNA CT 47790021682 BACIGALUPO, CHARLES A EILEEN S BACIGALUPO 2828 SILVERLEAF LN 47790038947 DEPASQUALE, ESTHER 1825 PLUMBAGO LANE 47790028740 STEPHEN D QUINN LIV TRUS" C A PETERSON QUINN LIV TRI 3145 DAHLIA WAY 47790038769 MCCAW, DANIEL L=& DIANE 1849 PLUMBAGO WAY 47790000962 MUELLER, MICHAEL J=& JAN 2438 INDIAN PIPE WAY 47790015957 EGRET TRAIL TRUST 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790021802 MORFITT, MARTHA ANNA M PATRICK LEO WEBER 2804 SILVERLEAF LANE 47790000784 PHELPS TR, ROBERT ROBERT J PHELPS TRUST UTD 9/11/07 47790028766 BENSON, MICHAEL D=& SHIF 3150 DAHLIA WAY 47790001686 LANG, BRUCE MICHAEL MURIEL MARIE LANG 2646 BULRUSH LN 47790000881 SCHREIER, BRADLEY MARJORIE SCHREIER K 2422 INDIAN PIPE WAY 76925000122 TORINO AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 47790022267 JULIET C SPROUL REV TRUST 2935 BELLFLOWER LN 47790015656 DOWSON, JOHN J=& NANCY 2732 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790038785 DESIMONE, LISE 1845 PLUMBAGO WAY 7333012027 WAGGONER, DONALD F=& Z 1252 GORDON RIVER TRL 47790038824 KASSEM, GARY 1826 PLUMBAGO LN 7333010728 BROWN TR, CRAIG D CRAIG D BROWN REV LIV TRL UTD 3/31/83 47790038808 MCGOUGH TR, THOMAS J=& JEAN B MCGOUGH REV TRUS 9 W BAY LN 47790001301 SMITH, BENSON F=& LINDA 110965 MAPLE HILL LANE 7333011167 COMMITTE JR, THOMAS C=81201 GORDON RIVER TRL 47790050187 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 76925012709 PURPURA, SALVATORE A=& 2070 TORINO WAY 47790001262 OLMSTED, ADAM K=& ANNE 2520 DAY LILY PL 76925012068 TORINO AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 20767010957 COLLIER CNTY E NAPLES FIRE CONTRL/RES E N NAPLES FIRE CONTRL/RES 47790021608 DAVID L BRENNAN TRUST 2835 SILVERLEAF LN 47790022380 SOLOVE, TAMARA DENISE 2956 BELLFLOWER LN 22712001320 AVILA AT GREY OAKS HOME(ASSOC INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MGM 47790015805 SLOAN, LARRY E 2744 BUCKTHORN WAY 47790008003 GREY OAKS COUNTY CLUB IN 2400 GREY OAKS DR N 22712000923 AVILA AT GREY OAKS HOME(ASSOC INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MGM 47790008508 HALSTATT LLC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790016053 S MACLENNAN CROWLEY TR 2743 BUCKTHORN WAY 266000006 EARL G HODGES FAM TRUST 2140 COACH HOUSE LN 22712000224 AVILA AT GREY OAKS HOME(ASSOC INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MGM 47790000409 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790021365 REFERENCE ONLY L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM 53220000280 RICHIE, LEROY C=& JULIA T 111 WILLITS SUTE 300 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1459 53220000303 BURGESS, W STEPHEN=& JO, 2396 TERRA VERDE LANE 53220000329 SILVERMAN, CHARLES JOYCE S HAGEL-SILVERMAN 2630 GREY OAKS DRIVE N #: 53220000345 RUSSELL R WAGGONER JR RI 2630 GREY OAKS DR N APT 1- 53220000361 GLYNN, JAMES V=& MARY G 687 MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE 53220000387 RHINESMITH, STEPHEN H KATHLEEN L RHINESMITH 2630 GREY OAKS DR N #19 53220000400 THOMPSON, WESLEY M=& N 2630 GREY OAKS DR N 53220000426 BROWN, JAMES E_& PAMEL, 2630 GREY OAKS DR N APT 2: 53220000442 CONROY, EDMUND F=& CAR 2640 GREY OAKS DR N #22 53220000468 BARTON, ELIZABETH H 2640 GREY OAKS DR N APT 2: 53220000484 IRVING A LEWIS RESIDENCE - 2640 GREY OAKS DR N 53220000507 BRENNAN JR, JOHN=& DORC 849 CELLA RD 53220000523 DAWKINS, PETER M=& JUD112640 GREY OAKS DR N #26 53220000549 POLK DECEDENTS TRUST POLK QTIP TRUST 53220000565 FLAGG, CLINTON D=& MART 2640 GREY OAKS DRIVE N #2(' 53220000581 CERNY, MARK J=& JITKA M 2640 GREY OAKS DR N 47790026027 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 13170000529 MOORINGS INCORPORATED 120 MOORINGS PARK DR 47790130049 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 13170001023 MOORINGS INC 120 MOORINGS PARK DR 7333002066 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790038497 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 22712000428 AVILA AT GREY OAKS HOME(ASSOC INC 258971509 WORLD TENNIS CLUB INC 4802 AIRPORT PULLING RD N 265680003 C R & S M HAGERSTROM LIV 2482 COACH HOUSE LN 265720002 HAVIG, MICHAEL T=& KIMBE 2550 COACH HOUSE LN 2640 GREY OAKS DR N APT NEWELL PROPERTY MGM 30550000054 WINN, WILLIAM 2600 COACH HOUSE LN 265760004 RUMBERGER, EDWARD A BARBARA H RUMBERGER 2652 COACH HOUSE LN 265560000 BOLL, GREGORY G 2263 COACH HOUSE LN 265600009 JONES III, FALCONER=& BRIC 2211 KINGFISH ROAD 266800002 THELMA T HODGES REV TRU 2140 COACH HOUSE LANE 265480009 MIHM, WILLIAM J=& SANDR 2832 COACH HOUSE LN 265520008 MARTIN, ROBERT W=& DEN12848 COACH HOUSE LN 266240002 QUINBY III, CLYDE C=& EMM 2400 COACH HOUSE LN 13170000024 MOORINGS INCORPORATED 120 MOORINGS PARK DR 47790050103 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB I % BARRON COLLIER COMPAN 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790000771 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 266200000 HODGES, THELMA T 2140 COACH HOUSE LN 266080000 FRANCIS D NEWELL REV TRU 2900 COACH HOUSE LN 266440006 FULLER, ROBERT C 2430 COACH HOUSE LN 7333008060 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 76925000025 MIRAMONTE AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 47790050145 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 258972702 WARRENTON ENTERPRISES ( 3322 OLYMPIC DR APT 222 7333002121 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790130081 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 76925000041 MIRAMONTE AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 267040007 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1460 47790100024 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 25340000062 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNER'S ASSN INC PO BOX 110339 47790038400 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 13170001528 MOORINGS INCORPORATED 120 MOORINGS PARK DR 7333007087 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333010100 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(4200 GULF SHORE BLVD N 47790038387 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333000084 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790099326 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333010650 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 51999000063 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIC C/O RESORT MANAGEMENT 7333002105 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790050064 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB I % BARRON COLLIER COMPAN 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333009069 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 25340000020 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNER'S ASSN INC PO BOX 110339 7333010087 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790026661 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790008757 COLLIER COUNTY 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E % OFC OF THE COUNTY ATT( 79840000026 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC INC % RESORT MANAGMENT 267200009 SCHOOL DISTRICT -PES POINCIANA ELEMENTARY % SUPERINTENDENT 77089000106 CCC TRADITIONS LLC 2020 SALZEDO STREET SUITE #200 267120406 AGR TM LLC % ANGELO, GORDON & CO 245 PARK AVE FL 26 47790024207 TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAKS 3200 BAILEY LN STE 117 47790028562 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS � 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333003065 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN( 2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790026043 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 256720008 WORLD TENNIS CLUB INC 4802 AIRPORT PULLING RD N 267120008 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CC PROPERTY TAX-PSX/JB 700 UNIVERSE BLVD 47790130023 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790026629 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790026085 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 267120105 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAG 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 1& 47790160022 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790026069 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790000108 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 76925000148 MIRAMONTE AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 76925000203 MIRAMONTE AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 47790021983 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 20765401403 SCHOOL DISTRICT-PES2 POINCIANA ELEMENTARY % SUPERINTENDENT 47790024825 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790008537 ODONNELL LANDSCAPES INC 4291 WILLIAMS RD 47790000205 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790023020 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 258972605 EVANS, RICHARD H PO BOX 1449 7333002053 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790038426 ODONNELL LANDSCAPES INC 4291 WILLIAMS RD 47790022063 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1461 9.D.7 267120901 REFERENCE ONLY TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESID AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMIf 77087000027 FLEGEL, S LESLIE=& ELYNOR 2307 TRADITION WAY #A1 1C 77087000043 HLR INVESTMENTS LP 5800 MERLE HAY ROAD SUITI PO BOX 394 77087000069 FECCI, DENNIS P=& ELIZABE143 HAMLET DR 77087000085 FLANIGAN, MICHAEL P LISA L TRUBIANO 2307 TRADITION WAY 77087000108 VICTOR A BONOMO REV TRL 2311 TRADITION WAY #A2-1( 77087000124 CUNNINGHAM, ROBERT H=8321 NORTH GLENHURST DRI\ 77087000140 CERVIERI JR ET AL, JOSEPH L 10064 CHERRY HILLS AVENUE 77087000166 STIKELEATHER, ALLAN=& LIN 2311 TRADITIONS WAY #202 77087000182 MACDUFF, CLYDE E_& KELLY 1142 PARTRIDGE LANE 77087000205 BURKE, PAUL JOSEPH LINDSEY A BURKE 1000 S PINE ISLAND ROAD 77087000221 GILCHRIST, JAMES ROBERT GINA RAY GILCHRIST 507 CASCADE DR 77087000247 LINK, JOHN F=& KATHERINE 6 STEEPLECHASE LANE 77087000263 BOWEN, ROBERT M=& MAR 2319 TRADITION WAY #A4-1( 77087000289 STARK, SANDRA M 2319 TRADITION WAY #102 77087000302 SCHENK, ROBERT H SUZANNA A SCHENK 2319 TRADITION WAY #201 77087000328 LENROW, KRISTINE C 2319 TRADITION WAY #A4-2( 77087000344 LOWERY, JOHN=& SANDRA 2446 RIDGECROFT AVE SE 77087000360 DAN TR, NANCY M NANCY M DAN LIVING TRUST 2323 TRADITION WAY #102 77087000386 BOYD, JOSEPH W=& DARLEN 2323 TRADITION WAY #201 77087000409 SALVATORI, LEO J=& SHELLE' 2323 TRADITION WAY UNIT 2 77087000425 ZARROLI, MARY E 2314 TRADITION WAY #A6-1( 77087000441 OFLAHERTY, JOHN J=& NAN(2314 TRADITION WAY #A6-1( 77087000467 JOHN S LESKIW REV LIV TRU. 3609 DOWNING STREET 77087000483 GRACEY, R THOMAS=& SAN[ 3177 OLYMPIA LN 77087000506 BAILEY, DEBRA JEAN 2310 TRADITION WAY UNIT A7-101 77087000522 ROSEMARIE K ETTLINGER TR 2310 TRADITION WAY #A7-1( 77087000548 PASINI, LAWRENCE A ELIZABETH A PASINI 43 ARROWWOOD CIR 77087000564 CHAPMAN, DOUGLAS F=& L( 2310 TRADITION WAY UNIT A7-202 77087000580 WETZEL, STUART A=& SHER12306 TRADITION WAY #A8-1( 77087000603 LAFONTAINE, STEVEN G MARIA P LAFONTAINE 3 PLUNKETT PLACE 77087000629 GARY DUANE BIGHAM REV 12306 TRADITION WAY #201 77087000645 ACHECAR M D, FREDDY A MARIA R ACHECAR 2306 TRADITION WAY UNIT 77087000661 DAVID L BRENNAN TRUST 121 S MAIN ST STE 500 77087000687 PIERSON, DONALD P 2305 RESIDENCE CIRCLE UNIT A9-102 77087000700 DANIS, STEPHEN F=& MARY 2305 RESIDENCE CIRCLE #A9- 77087000726 WEINAND, GARY J 2305 RESIDENCE CIRCLE UNIT A9-202 77087001547 BIRRANE, JOHN H=& FRANCE 2309 RESIDENCE CIR #131-101 77087001563 REUTER, WILLIAM J=& SELIN 2309 RESIDENCE CIR #102 77087001589 LORENTZ, ROBERT P DANNIE MAXEY LORENTZ 3490 TOURNAMENT DR 77087001602 JAMES SIMON REV TRUST LYNN LAGOMARSINO TRUST 2309 RESIDENCE CIRCLE #131 77087001628 BISSONTZ, DANIEL J=& CELIN 2312 BERWICK CT 77087001644 MCNALLY TR, EDWARD C MARGARET M MCNALLY TR 2312 BERWICK CT UNIT 102 77087001660 HOLTHAUS, GERARD E CONSTANCE HOLTHAUS 2312 BERWICK CT #201 77087001686 DAN TR, JODY L JODY L DAN REV TRUST 2312 BERWICK CT UNIT 202 77087001709 KATHERINE T PREBISH TRUS-434 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 77087001725 BOCK, GARRETT C 2313 RESIDENCE CIRCLE #133 - Packet Pg. 1462 77087001741 P W ZALOKAR REV TRUST OF 2313 RESIDENCE CIRCLE UNIT 133-201 77087001767 IRVILENE J GARDNER TRUST 4845 WEST 90TH STREET 77087001783 STOLBERG, DOUGLAS FARRE JOAN ELLEN STOLBERG 2317 RESIDENCE CIR #101 77087001806 JAECKEL, RICHARD A=& CAR(2317 RESIDENCE CIR #134-102 77087001822 JOHN P BURKE & JUDITH A B REVOCABLE TRUST 3479 HIGHLAND CENTER DR 77087001848 C DALE REIS & KATHERINE G MCCARTHY REIS FAMILY TRU 2317 RESIDENCE CIR #202 77087001864 MCCARTHY, THOMAS W=& [ 2321 RESIDENCE Cl #135-101 77087001880 LAMBERTSEN, ROBERT H LINDA I LAMBERTSEN 2321 RESIDENCE CIR #135-10 77087001903 MEYER, LAWRENCE G LINDA ELIZABETH MEYER 2321 RESIDENCE CIR #201 77087001929 TRUST NO 2321-B5-202 2321 RESIDENCE CIRCLE #20: 77087001945 MACARTHUR, ROBERTS 2325 RESIDENCE CIR #101 77087001961 GOOD, JAMES=& HELEN 2325 RESIDENCE CIR UNIT 10 77087001987 FREUND, MATTHIAS=& MAR 2325 RESIDENCE CIRCLE #66- 77087002009 FROSCHLE, CHARLES F=& JO) 2325 RESIDENCE CIR # 202 76925012084 TORINO AT GREY OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN INC % KEB MGT SERVICES 7333002037 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790024223 REFERENCE ONLY TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM 76520000022 JENKINS, EDWARD L=& SUSP 2458 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000048 BACCILE, PETER E 5 ASHTON DR 76520000064 BACCILE, JOANNE M PETER E BACCILE 76520000080 NICHOLAS A HUNTER TRUST 16 RAYNOR DR 76520000103 PEARSALL, HENRY B=& JANE 2448 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000129 TRANTER, NYDIA G NYDIA C TRANTER TR 76520000145 DEWALD, RONALD L=& MAR 2444 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000161 BEVERLY J HAAS TRUST 2442 TERRA VERDE LANE 76520000187 FARRELL, GARY N=& JANE G 2438 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000200 2436 TERRA VERDE LANE TR 2436 TERRA VERDE LN 2454 TERRA VERDE LN NYDIA C TRANTER TRUST 76520000226 K B DOLLENBERG LIV TRUST 11702 FALLSWOOD TER 76520000242 CLEAVER EST, VIRGINIA D % JAMES P CLEAVER JR PR 368 YOUNGS CORNERS RD 76520000268 MURRAY, WILLIAM B ELIZABETH J MURRAY 76520000284 MCGEE, DAVID WILLIAM 1053 CLONSILLA AVENUE 76520000307 SPIVACK, JEROME=& STEFAf 2628 FAR VIEW DR 76520000323 FLANNERY, MARK MANUEL GUERRERO 76520000349 SCHRIBER, ROBERT A=& STE12418 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000365 MCGLOTHLIN, THOMAS D 112 PHLOX CREEK 76520000381 GLYNN, CHRISTOPHER M 2414 TERRA VERDE LANE 76520000404 ACQUAVIVA, JAY 193 PARTRIDGE LN 76520000420 MARCIA NELSON PAYNE TRI, 2133 FIR STREET 76520000446 DEMEO, DANIEL R 2406 TERRA VERDE LANE 76520000462 WALL, SUSAN J 2404 TERRA VERDE LANE #24 76520000488 SUSAN E DAWLEY REV TRUS- 2402 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000501 HEALY, PATRICK G=& JULIE N 2398 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000527 BURGESS, W STEPHEN=& JO, 2396 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000543 HARRISON, DIANA J 2394 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000569 RON AND LIZ BROWN REV Tf 2392 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000585 ROVICK, ROGER L=& CAROL. 2661 ARCOLA LANE 76520000608 JANET L BERGMAN REV TRU' 2386 TERRA VERDE LANE 86 KLINE RD 237 KLOTTER AVENUE 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1463 9.D.7 76520000624 MCGEENEY, JOHN S=& DIAN 2384 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000640 VOR BROKER, ROBERT S=& S PO BOX 909 76520000666 SHARON MOON REV TRUST 26 WOODLAWN AVE 76520000682 HALL, TIMOTHY E JILL LAWSON HALL 76520000705 SUGRUE, MICHAEL F=& MOP 2374 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000721 GERARDI, EUGENE=& CHERY 142 COUNTRY CLUB DR 76520000747 LODGE, GERALD M MOLLY F ASHBY 76520000763 CURK, LAWRENCE L=& NANC 2366 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000789 HARTZBERG, IVAN S=& MAR 2364 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000802 HELLER, ALEXANDRA E_& PF 1901 GALLEON DRIVE 76520000828 DIRENZO, ROBERT M=& SUS, 2358 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000844 MEHLMAN, ARTHUR S=& JUI2356 TERRA VERDE LANE 76520000860 HABERFIELD, GLENN=& DOR 3 VILLAGE WAY 76520000886 WILLIAMS, SUSAN J 2352 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000909 GERARDI, GASPER V=& VALE 1 HOLBROOK CT 76520000925 KRUCKEL, KATHRYN T 950 FRANKLIN LAKES RD 76520000941 LAWRENCE J BLUM TRUST 2385 TERRA VERDE LN 76520000967 ROSS JR, THOMAS J=& ELISE 11 MAGNOLIA PLACE 47790027741 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790021459 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 2376 TERRA VERDE LANE 1021 PARK AVE 7333010621 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 47790025222 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 77089000148 VILLAS OF TRADITIONS AT GREY OAKS HOMEOWNERS A % SENTRY MGMT, INC 13800022000 COLLIER CNTY 2685 HORSESHOE DR S STE 2 47790009002 COLLIER COUNTY 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E % OFC COUNTY ATTORNEY 7333010634 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790024922 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790008524 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790050226 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 267121007 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS � 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790015203 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 52731006567 KENSINGTON PARK MSTR AS C/O NEWELL PROPERTY MNC 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 7333002147 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN IN(2386 GREY OAKS DR N 7333009085 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790025125 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790038484 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB I % BARRON COLLIER COMPAN 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790000506 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS F 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 256400001 WORLD TENNIS CLUB INC 4802 AIRPORT PULLING RD N 47790038688 GREY OAKS PROP OWNERS / 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 7333010142 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790008553 COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAG 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 1& 20767010407 ROYAL POINCIANA GOLF CLL 1600 SOLANA RD 47790038581 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB I % BARRON COLLIER COMPAN 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790000768 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 61941000001 FRANK TR, WILLIAM H PAUL L FRANK TR C/O BARNETT BANKS TRUST 7333010647 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 47790002504 GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB 12600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY Packet Pg. 1464 9.D.7 NAME4 LEGALI LEGAL2 LEGAL3 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHTEEN GC -19 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT D 4851 TAM IAM I 1 2549 25 COMM NW CNR OI OF TORINO AND MIRAM ALG SOUTH R/W W 50FTTO F ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT C ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT C ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT C ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT H L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS TRACT C 2640 GOLDEN G L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK' TRACT A AVILA UNIT ONE LOT 104 AVILA UNIT ONE LOT 105 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 506 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 604 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 505 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 402 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 501 AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 205 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 606 AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 305 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 401 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 605 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 612 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 409 AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 207 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 503 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 403 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 509 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 511 AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 307 AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 304 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 608 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 408 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 609 KAREN L THOMF AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 204 Al THAT PORTION OF TRAC' GREY OAKS UNIT THREE DESC AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 404 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 610 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 611 2630 TRILLIUM \ AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 405 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 512 AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 202 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 1 AVILA UNIT ONE LOT 101 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 2 AND THAT PORTIC 1 DESC AS: COM NLYMOST CI\ AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 508 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT J TORINO REPLAT LOT 29 Packet Pg. 1465 9.D.7 2180 WEST SR 4 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT C TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 3 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 7 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 10 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 24 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 25 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 2 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 23 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 6 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 41 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 40 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 22 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 36 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 4 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 39 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 11 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 12 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 21 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 20 AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 302 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 8 AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 208 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 602 TORINO REPLAT LOT 33 TORINO REPLAT LOT 32 AVILA UNIT ONE LOT 102 TORINO REPLAT LOT 5 TORINO REPLAT LOT 13 TORINO REPLAT LOT 15 TORINO REPLAT LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT K TORINO LOT 37 REPLAT LOT AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 301 TORINO REPLAT LOT 16 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 502 TORINO REPLAT LOT 31 TORINO REPLAT LOT 30 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE THA PORTION OF TRACT D AS OR 4577 PG 2485-86 AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 201 L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK: LOT 8 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 1, LESS THAT PORTIO AS: COM NLYMOST CNR LOT AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 504 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 38 TORINO REPLAT LOT 35 L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK'TRACT B 2685 HORSESHC L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK'TRACT C AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 203 Packet Pg. 1466 9.D.7 TORINO REPLAT LOT 17 TORINO REPLAT LOT 27 TORINO REPLAT LOT 26 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE THA PORTION OF TRACT GC -7 COM NW CNR TR GC -7 BEING ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT B L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 7 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 607 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK T LOT 9 TORINO REPLAT LOT 19 TORINO REPLAT LOT 28 TORINO REPLAT LOT 34 AVILA UNIT TWO LOT 206 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT B TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 32 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN TRA 10 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT A TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 36 AVILA UNIT ONE LOT 103 TORINO REPLAT LOT 18 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 45 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 46 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 14 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 601 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 31 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 48 2666 LERMITAGI L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK: LOT 10 L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK' LOT 9 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 49 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT A L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 22 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 47 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 44 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 6 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 407 AVILA UNIT FOUR LOT 406 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 33 AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 306 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 50 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 51 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 18 TORINO REPLAT LOT 42 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 59 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 17 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 58 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 35 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN TRACT B Packet Pg. 1467 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 28 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 19 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 52 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 60 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 57 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 34 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 16 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 510 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN TRACT A TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 56 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 15 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 5 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 20 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 21 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE TRACT A (LANDSCAPE BL TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 1 L'ERMITAGE II AT GREY OAK; LOT 11 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 39 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 37 AVILA UNIT FIVE LOT 507 TORINO REPLAT LOT 47 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 55 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 38 TORINO REPLAT LOT 48 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 30 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS TRACT B TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 13 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT29 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 53 TORINO REPLAT LOT 49 TORINO REPLAT LOT 50 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 1 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS LOT 3 TORINO REPLAT LOT 51 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 40 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 54 TORINO REPLAT LOT 52 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 23 TORINO REPLAT LOT 53 2685 HORSESHC ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS TRACT A ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 39 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 38 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 37 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 1 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 61 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 22 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1468 AVILA UNIT SIX LOT 603 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN TRA 9 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 9 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 41 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT B TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 11 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 8 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT A ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 36 AVILA UNIT THREE LOT 303 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 42 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 9 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 35 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 34 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 6 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 30 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT G ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA TRACT F GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 9 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 33 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 12 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 29 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 8 2302 SILVER PAL GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 7 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 33 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 34 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 35 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 10 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 5 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 13 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 22 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 25 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 25 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 30 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 26 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 7 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 32 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 5 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1469 UTD 6/12/06 WEYBRIDGE ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 26 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 8 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 12 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 28 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 29 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 6 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 27 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 26 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 7 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 31 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 10 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 24 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 28 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 3 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 20 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 11 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 36 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 6 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 31 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 24 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 25 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 27 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 16 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 23 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 21 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 1 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 27 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRA LOT 13 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 22 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 6 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS TRACT A TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 13 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1470 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 15 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 23 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 13 1705 VENEZIA VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 2 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 8 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 14 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 15 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 34 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 27 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 33 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 5 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 35 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT B ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 20 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 32 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE TRACT C TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 4 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 5 GERALD R LANZ ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 13 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 21 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 26 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 16 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 7 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 20 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR TRACT GC -8, OR 1808 PC ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 17 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 6 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 11 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 14 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 3 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 15 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 17 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 3 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1471 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 25 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 4 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 19 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 6 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 36 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 19 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 10 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 4 HOVE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 3 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 16 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 19 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 18 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 12 TORINO REPLAT LOT 46 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 24 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 12 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 18 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 18 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 23 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 2 2249 MIRAMON TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 1 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 10 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 22 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 13 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 17 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 9 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 20 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 13 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 6 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 11 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 21 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 17 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 23 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1472 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 24 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 21 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 4 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 26 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 17 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 9 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 8 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 20 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 19 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 18 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 15 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 16 UTD 12/13/99 U GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT TORINO LOTS 43-45 REPLAT LOT 43 LAUREN T MICHI ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 24 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 7 TORINO LOTS 43-45 REPLAT LOT 44 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE TRACT A-1 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 12 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 20 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 14 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 12 JOHN A MINUTE ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 21 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 8 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 62 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 5 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 19 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 19 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 20 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 21 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 5 VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 3 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS LOT 43 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 6 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 25 2051 ISLA VISTA ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 6 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 32 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1473 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 8 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 1 TORINO LOTS 43-45 REPLAT LOT 45 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 22 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 11 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 13 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 14 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 11 2180 WEST SR 4 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT D TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 28 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 2037 ISLA VISTA ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 3 UTD 5/5/98 - UT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 10 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 31 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 24 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 25 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 23 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 23 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 15 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 5 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 3 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 16 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 4 SUZANNE M BOI ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 16 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 6 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 8 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 20 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 26 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 3 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 17 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 24 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 8 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1474 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 22 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 17 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 17 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 15 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 27 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN LOT 24 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 21 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 10 2028 ISLA VISTA ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 19 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 21 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 8 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 17 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 22 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 22 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 19 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 20 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 23 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 10 STE 1210 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 1 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 30 TORINO AND MIRAMONTE BLK M LOT 29 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 6 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 OR 2005 PG 206 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT Z GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 94 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 95 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT ] OR 1808 PG 709 LEO KAPOR REV GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 61 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 21 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 87 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1475 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 25 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 15 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 8 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 35 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT Z - GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 30 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 40 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE TRACT B (LANDSCAPE BL GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 12 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 15 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT OR 1929 PG 2088 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 191 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 190 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 103 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 OR 1936 PG 2183 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 OR 2066 PG 2110 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 14 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT THAT PORTION OF LOT 9 IN OR 2409 PG 580 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 1 2180 WEST SR 4: TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT B GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 195 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 20 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 15 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT -r OR 1817 PG 824 UTD 12/1/05 UT GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 17 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 3 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1476 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 89 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 16 BOX 278 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 114 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 16 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 50 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 56 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 19 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 18 BOX 2059 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 20 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 25 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT E ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 13 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 MARCIA A KINZE ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 11 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 8 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 13 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 6 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 30 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 1i OR 1975 PG 51 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 29 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 19 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 174 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 19 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 18 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1477 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 17 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 6 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 16 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 6 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 43 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT � TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT L2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 17 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO REPLAT TRACT E M KAY GRENS RE ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 20 ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 8 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 21 1263 OSPREY TR ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 10 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 13 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 192 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 14 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 185 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 17 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 13 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 8 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT MARYJO ENGLA GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT i ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 9 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 24 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 34 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 32 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 31 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 33 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 14 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1478 9.D.7 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT LESS THAT PORTION DES SOUTH COMMON CNR OF LO - GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 5 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 15 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT OR 2054 PG 0543 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 194 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT AND THAT PORTION OF I DESC AS: COM SOUTH COMM GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT Z- OR 1794 PG 763 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 28 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 11 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 23 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 22 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT LESS THAT PORTION DES 2409 PG 580 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 11 CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS TRACT B GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 1 3134 DAHLIA Wi GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 187 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 104 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 188 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 186 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 115 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 13 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 176 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 175 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 113 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 6 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 5 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 101 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT f ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN LOT 13 Packet Pg. 1479 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 35 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 1 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 2 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 1 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 16 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 17 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 16 STEVEN P PREST GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 53 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT 1100 RUE DE LA GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 3 UTD 12/21/90 U GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 189 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 17 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 7 UTD 12/12/01 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 193 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 108 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 19 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 177 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 15 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 8 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 85 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 13 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 86 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 12 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT MARY LOU PAW GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 92 GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN LOT 12 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT � ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 8 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 18 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 179 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 8 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 38 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP REPLAT OF LOTS 7,8 ANC LOT 9A GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 83 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 12 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1480 9.D.7 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 93 N I C L F 27 49 25 THAT POR -TION OF LOT 97 LYING N GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY, LES 5435 JAEGER RD AVILA UNIT ONE TRACT A 5435 JAEGER RD AVILA UNIT FOUR TRACT A EXEMPT QTIP M GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 178 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 65 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT � OR 1778 PG 1719 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 184 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 14 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4 LESS THAT PORTION DES BEG AT SLY MOST CNR OF LO - GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 3 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 13 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 6 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO REPLAT TRACT D GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 11 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 12 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 2180 WEST SR 4 TRADITIONS, THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 11 EDMUND F CON GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 111 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 88 MARIDA D FURL GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 180 2685 HORSESHC ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS TRACT B GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 69 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 84 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 9 GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN LOT 6 Packet Pg. 1481 9.D.7 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 10 & S1/2 OF LOT 11 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 12 & N1/2 OF LOT 1. GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 14 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT E GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 181 GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN LOT 7 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 110 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 13 GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 182 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 4 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 10 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 70 GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 116 2402 CHICORY L GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE LOT 183 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 4THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 FOLL: BEG SLY MOST CNR OF GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT E 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE TRACT F GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOTS 125 AND 126 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT 64 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 5 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP REPLAT OF LOTS 7,8,ANE LOT 7A GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 7 1240 GORDON F ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOTS 4 & 5 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN LOT 6 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 2THAT PART OF LOT 26 DE BEG AT SW CNR LOT 27, N 391 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP LOT 26 & 27 GREY OAKS UNIT FIFTEEN TRACT GC -16 TORINO REPLAT LOT 54 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO LOT 2THAT PART OF LOT 26 DE BEG NW CNR LOT 25, N 21DD 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO REPLAT TRACT J 3301 TAMIAMI 1 UNPLATTED LANDS 26 49 25 NE CNR OF SEC 26 THEN(LI OF SEC N 89DEG 24129"11W GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE LOT 106 AND LOT 107 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN LOTS 131 + 132 5435 JAEGER RD AVILA UNIT SIX TRACT A (ROAD R/W) GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOTS 67 AND 68 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE TRA AND THAT PORT TR GC4 IN OR 2016 PG 68, LESS GREY 5435 JAEGER RD AVILA UNIT FIVE TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT THREE TRACT E, LESS E 307FT 0 S 2900FT OF N 3000FT, LESS E GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR LOT AND 71 23 49 25 SE1/4 OF SW1/4 OI SE1/4 OF SW1/4 5435 JAEGER RD AVILA UNIT TWO TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT TWO TRACT ""B"" ( BUFFER ) GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE THAT OF TRACT ""C"" N/K/A CAT GREY OAKS CONDO PH I A' L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT Packet Pg. 1482 9.D.7 L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT' L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT ; L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT ; L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT ; L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT ; L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT L'ERMITAGE AT GREY OAKS A CONDOMINIUM UNIT GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN TRACT A MOORINGS PARK AT GREY CTRACT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHTEEN ' GC -18 MOORINGS PARK AT GREY CTRACT 3 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS RO/ CLUBHOUSE & MAINTEN FACILITY TRACTS GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN PORTIONS OF TRACTS G(& 12 DESC IN OR 4577 PGS 24 5435 JAEGER RD AVILA UNIT THREE TRACT A 13 49 25 COM AT SW CNR SI S89DEG E 671.85FT TO P DEG E 500.12FT,NO2DEG E 46 23 49 25 W 161.82FT OF S1/ OF S1/2 OF SE1/4 LESS N R/W 2.33 AC 23 49 25 E 161.82FT OF W 323.64FT OF S1/2 OF S1/ SE1/4, LESS N 30FT R/W 2.33 EASTON PARK AT COACH HC LANE LOT 1 23 49 25 E1/2 OF E 323.15F1 OF W 646.79FT OF S1/2 i OF SE1/4, LESS N 30FT R/W 23 49 25 W 161.22FT OF E 322.43FT OF W 969.22F1 S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SEI/4, LESS f 23 49 25 E161.22FT OF W 969.22FT OF S1/2 OF S1/ SE1/4, LESS N30FT 23 49 25 W1/2 OF W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SW1/ N 30FT 2.39 AC OR 1651 PG 8 23 49 25 W1/2 OF E 321.95F OF W 1291.17FT OF S1/2 S1/2 OF SE1/4, LESS N 30FT 23 49 25 E1/2 OF E 321.95F1 OF W 1291.17FT OF S1/2 S1/2 OF SE1/4, LESS N 30FT 23 49 25 E1/2 OF W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SW1/ R/W 2.39 AC OR 1900 PG 749 MOORINGS PARK AT GREY CTRACT 1 GREY OAKS UNIT FIFTEEN TRACT GC -14 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO THOS PORTIONS OF TRACT GC- OF TRACT GC -2 AS DESC IN OF 23 49 25 W1/2 OF SW1/4 Of SE1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS N R/W 4.77 AC OR 1676 PG 981 23 49 25 E 321.45FT OF W 1612.64FT OF S1/2 OF SI SE1/4, LESS N 30FT R/W, LESS 23 49 25 E1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS R/ AC ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT FIFTEEN TRACT GC -15 13 49 25 COM AT SW CNR SI S89DEG 17'14""E 1112.1 POB, S89DEG 17'14"E 59.82F1 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS RO) CLUBHOUSE & MAINTEN FACILITY TRACTS GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHTEEN ' R 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE TRACT B 25 49 25 ALL LYING N OF GOLDEN GATE PKWY, LE' 105FT, WLY R/W + LESS W 82 Packet Pg. 1483 9.D.7 GREY OAKS UNIT SEVENTEEP TRACT R CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN TRACT C MOORINGS PARK AT GREY CTRACT 4 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP CONSERVATION AREA #2 THOSE PORTIONS AS DESC IN GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN TRACT B ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT SIXTEEN TRACT R ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP THE PORTION OF GOLF C 3 DESC AS CONSRV ESMT #11 2685 HORSESHC ISLA VISTA AT GREY OAKS TRACT R ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS RO/ CLUBHOUSE & MAINTEN FACILITY TRACTS GREY OAKS UNIT FIFTEEN TRACT GC -13 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R CAPISTRANO AT GREY OAKS TRACT A ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT TEN TRACT R STE 800 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE TRACT F 2685 HORSESHC VENEZIA AT GREY OAKS TRACT R 5775 OSCEOLA 1 26 49 25 COMM NE CNR OF W 430FT TO POB, S 132C 660FT, N 1320FT, E 660FT TO TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT L1 25 49 25 COMM AT SW CNR 14 GREY OAKS UNIT 15, 19.58FT, S02DEG E 84.06FT, AL GREY OAKS UNIT NINE TRAC LESS THAT PORTION NKA VERDE AT GREY OAKS CONDC GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE TRACT R ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN THAT PORTION OF TRAC' LYING IN TWP 49 RG 25 SEC 2 13 49 25 COMM SW CNR SEi 100.05FT TO POB, CONT 571.80FT N 136.66FT, N 44 DE 25 49 25 N 431FT OF W 8271 OF E 932FT OF S1/2, LYG GG, + S 585FT OF W 827FT OF GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHTEEN ' GC -17 GREY OAKS UNIT TEN TRACT A GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN TRACT R 25 49 25 COM AT CL INTERS OF GOLDEN G PKWY & E 25, N 441.80FT, S89DEG W 1C GREY OAKS UNIT NINETEEN TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT ELEVEN THAT PORTION OF TRAC- LYING IN TWP 49 RG 25 SEC 2 GREY OAKS UNIT ONE TRACT ""A"" OR 1808 PG 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE 1 LESS TORINO LOT 37 REF 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO AND MIRAMONTE TRACT R-1 GREY OAKS UNIT SIX TRACT R 5775 OSCEOLA 1 UNPLATTED LANDS COMM P SEC 26, THENCE ALG N LI DEG 26'29"" E 1340.72' TO P( GREY OAKS UNIT NINE TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT THREE, A PORTION OF TRACT E AS OR 5273 PG 3586 GREY OAKS UNIT ONE TRACT ""R"" (R/W GREY WEST) GREY OAKS UNIT EIGHT TRA, (ROAD R/W) 13 49 25 UNREC'D PAR A-2 F DESC AS:COM AT SE CNR W 100.13FT TO POB, W 410.0 ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS RO/ CLUBHOUSE & MAINTEN FACILITY TRACTS THAT PORTI( GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN TRACT E GREY OAKS UNIT SEVEN TRA Packet Pg. 1484 25 49 25 THAT PORTION OF 25 NKA TRADITIONS THE RESIDENCES AT GREY OAKS C( TRADITIONS,THE GOLF REST[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG Al -101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG Al -102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG Al -201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG Al -202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A2-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A2-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A2-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A2-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A3-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A3-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A3-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A3-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A4-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A4-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A4-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A4-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A5-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A5-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A5-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A5-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A6-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A6-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A6-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A6-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A7-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A7-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A7-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A7-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A8-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A8-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A8-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A8-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A9-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A9-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A9-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG A9-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG B1-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG B1-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG B1-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG B1-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 132-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 132-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 132-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 132-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 133-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 133-102 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1485 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 133-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 133-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 134-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 134-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 134-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 134-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 135-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 135-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 135-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 135-202 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 136-101 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 136-102 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 136-201 TRADITIONS,THE GOLF RESI[ AT GREY OAKS A CONDO BLDG 136-202 6017 PINE RIDGE TORINO REPLAT TRACT R-2, LESS TORINO LOTS 43-45 REPLAT ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS RO/ CLUBHOUSE & MAINTEN FACILITY TRACTS THAT PORTA GREY OAKS UNIT 9 THAT PO OF TRACT ""A"" NKA TER AT GREY OAKS CONDO PH III I TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT EMILIO F CAMU! TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1486 9.D.7 TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAKI A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK' A CONDOMINIUM UNIT TERRA VERDE AT GREY OAK! A CONDOMINIUM UNIT GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT FIVE TRACT R (R/W GREY OAK ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT NINE TRACT GC -9 2180 WEST SR 4 TRADITIONS THE VILLAS AT GREY OAKS TRACT R N I C L F 27 49 25 LOT 9 LYING N OF SR 5-886 & L & 11, AND THAT PORTION OF STE 300 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE TRACT G (R/W) ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP THAT PORTION OF GOLF GC3 DESC AS CONSERVATION GREY OAKS UNIT NINE TRACT GC -8 LESS THAT P LYING IN SECTION 25 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE THP PORTION OF TRACT E LYI OF TRACT R GREY OAKS UNIT GREY OAKS UNIT FIFTEEN TRACT R 25 49 25 THOSE PORTIONS � DESC IN OR 4577 PGS 24 GREY OAKS UNIT FOUR TRACT R (R/W) KENSINGTON PARK PHASE F TRACT F ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS RO) CLUBHOUSE & MAINTEN FACILITY TRACTS ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP TRACT 2 GREY OAKS UNIT NINE TRAC & A PORTION OF TR H GI UNIT THREE & OTHER LANDS GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN THAT PORTION OF TRAC' 11 & 12 THAT LIE IN SEC 24 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO TRACT ""R"" ( R/W ) 13 49 25 THAT PORTION OF SW1/4 SEC 13 MORE PAI DESC AS: W3/4 OF S1/2 OF SV GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN TRACT R ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP GOLF COURSE TRACT 1; i THOSE PORTIONS OF CONSRV GREY OAKS UNIT THREE E 3C OF S 2900FT OF N 3000F TRACT E AND E 15FT OF TRAC UNPLATTED LANDS 23 49 25 OF W1/2, E1/2 OF NW1/ LAND LYING IN SEC 14 DESC A GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN THAT PORTION OF TRAC' 11 & 12 THAT LIE IN SEC 25 GREY OAKS UNIT TWO TRACT GC -1, GC -2,& GC- THOSE PORTIONS OF TR GC -1 WILDERNESS CO N I C L F LOTS 12-22 AS DESC IN OR 589 PG 95-108, LE. WILDERNESS C C UNITS 1-11 ( ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS TRP GC TRACT 3, LESS CONSR DESC IN OR 2869 PG 249, LES' GREY OAKS UNIT THREE TRACT GC -4,5,6, & 7 AN[ PORTION OF TR D DESC IN OR Packet Pg. 1487 LEGAL4 S OODEG W 1463.37FT, N 89DEG W COM NW CNR SITE 204, S 28DEG E 1, S 38DEG 371 1.50FT, S 51 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1488 38DEG 37'E 1.50FT, S 51DEG 23' 9.D.7 Y N /L^ V 11'1 CD Q 0 T N J IL a Packet Pg. 1489 THENCE S 80DEG 45'E 97FT, S 9.D.7 Y N /L^ V 11'1 CD Q 0 T N J IL a Packet Pg. 1490 & 140, N 22DEG 43'37"W 220.39 OF LOTS 139 & 140, N 22DEG 43' 9.D.7 Y N /L^ V v Lo 0 0 Co ti T O N J IL a Packet Pg. 1491 FT AS DESC IN OR 2053 PG 1671 - THENCE ALG SLY LI OF LOT 45 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1492 45, S 56DEG 00'00"E 91.98FT, E 197.57FT, S 51DEG E 118.02FT 58.44FT, N 55DEG E 236.33FT, 07FT TO A PT ON W R/W LI OF OAKS UNIT FOUR, LESS OR 1811 15FT OF N 100FT FOR ROAD R/W IN OR 2174 PG 1594, PH II (REC 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1493 TRACT C 49 & 2452-53 LYING IN SEC 24 ,S74DEG W 118.34FT S89DEG W AC OR 1959 PG 507 2.34 AC OR 801 PG 1042 30FT 2.33 AC OR 1333 PG 2377 4577 PGS 2454-57 COMM S1/4 CNR SEC 23 N 89 DEG 02DEG 21'43"E 460.34FT, S74DE TRACT M OF E 932FT OF S 1016FT, LESS 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1494 4682 PG 2725, AND THOSE 2869 PG 249 & MITIGATION AREA TRACT D POB, LESS N 100FT 18.49 AC OR ARC OF CURVE 251.19FT, N90DEG III OR 2404 PG 3183, PH I OR E 197FT, E 177FT, N 141FT W 932FT OF N1/2, LESS S 10FT & POB, S 392.13FT, S89DEG W CONT ALG N LI S 89 DEG 24' 29" N 2016.61FT,E 235FT,S425.36FT, OF TRACT B RUNNING ALG GOLF 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1495 AS DESC IN OR 4360 PG 3624 9.D.7 O le c 0 Cu Q CL Q LL c d E t w r Q c (D E t V r Q Packet Pg. 1496 OF TRACT A AS DESC IN OR 3424 DESC IN OR 2404 PG 3183, PH I 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1497 N 1/2 OF OLD GOLDEN GATE PARK - AREA #1 AS DESC IN OR 4682 PG LESS OR 2064 PG 1152 AND OR TRACT R, LESS THAT PORTION NKA LYING ADJ TO GREY OAKS UNIT TWP 49 RNG 25, LESS THOSE 1/4 LESS THOSE PORTIONS SOLD ESMT #2 AS DESC IN OR 4682 LESS THE S 2900FT OF THE S1/2 OF SW1/4 & S 132FT OF TWP 49 RNG 25, LESS ISLA VISTA ALL TR GC -2 AS DESC IN OR 4577 901 PG 1476 MITIGATION AREA DESC IN OR 1811 PG 1270, LESS THAT PORT 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1498 Grey Oaks DRI/PUD 9.D.7 N W * E S © Grady -Minor 610 305 0 610 Feet Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape, Architects ti rn Y 0 d /L^ V I* Lo 0 0 0 r 0 N J IL a Packet Pg. 1499 REVISED EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT ACCESS LOCATIONS DRIVEWAY /1 RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY EXISTING BEAR'S PAW ENTRANCE EXISTING POINCIANA DRIVEWAY J] VILLAGE ENTRANCE RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY EXISTING POINCWIA VILLAGE ENTRANCE EXISRNG COACH HOUSE UNE TI(I p O J0 EXISTING ELEME14TARY a SCHOOL ENTRANCE 711 Q DRIVEWAY #'BB OFFICE/COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY /2 OFFICE/COMMERCIAL EXISTING POINCIANA OFFICE ENTRANCE dpi (GREY OAKS DR DRNEWAY /84, COMERCK ENTRANCE COMMERCIAL ENTRANCES DRIVEYIAY ELIMINATED �ORIVEWAY 13A DRIVEWAY g4 DRIVEWAY #3B DRIVEWAY RESIDENTIAL R DRIVEWAYYBB _J DRIVEWAY 46A GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY DRIVEWAY /5 LEGEND • DRIVEWAY /12 t� SIGNAL RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE GOLDEN GATE P'ARKWA`/ LANE ARRANGEMENTS 99587/096/0500 CONCEPTUAL ROADWAY FOR SITE ACCESS Rev'sW0724/2017 MASTER PLAN WITH INTERCHANGE 1 of 9.D.7 0 Packet Pg. 1501 REVISED EXHIBIT 1 (;ONTINUED'� RIGHT OFFICE/COMMERCIAL RIGHT IN/OUT ACCESS ONLY EXISTING POINCIANA OFFICE ENTRANCE RIGHT IN/OIJ7 ACCESS ONLY Golden Gate/Airport Road interchange geometric layout developed and prepared by Wilson Miller, Inc. Exhibit produced by David Plummer & Associates, Inc. Revised by 0. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. - 2017 COMMERCIAL ENTRANCES 0 0 N 500' OACCESS ELIMINATED of I- FULL 2' MOVEMENT ACCESS 1111111 �� GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY dpi GREY OAKS DRI CONCEPTUAL ROADWAY MASTER PLAN GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IIII LEFT TURN ACCESS TO THE NORTH COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED FROM THE AIRPORT ROAD FASTBOUNO ON-RAMP TO GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY. LEGEND •O,, PROPGSEG TRAFFIC V SIGNAL LOCATIGN -'• 99587/09A/0500 URBAN INTERCHANGE Revised 07/2412017 D ETAI LS 1 2 of 2 ) 9.D.7 0 Packet Pg. 1502 5/03/90 5/23/90 6/11/90 Revised 5/25/2000 Revised 07/20/2017 REVISED EXHIBIT 2 GREY OAKS DRI PROJECT ACCESS CONDITIONS 0) Area Development Driveway Arterial Roadway Served(2) Phase - Opening Access Conditions 1 Golden Gate Parkway West Quad — • Full access, four way intersection under six lane divided Residential 2/3 roadway. Located to align with the Bear's Paw Service Entrance. Project left and right tum lanes. • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if warranted, subject to interconnect and signal progression. 2 Golden Gate Parkway West Quad - • Prior to grade separation at Golden Gate Parkway/ Office/Commercial 2/3 Airport Road: (3) • Full access, four way intersection under four and six lane divided roadway and aligned with existing Poinciana Office Park. Project left and right tum lanes. • With grade separation at Golden Gate Parkway/Airport Road: (3) • Right tum in and out only access. D Packet Pg. 1503 3A/3B Golden Gate Parkway 3C 4 G Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway North Quad - + • Full access, "four-way" intersection under four and six South Quad 2/3 lane divided roadway. Project dual inbound and outbound left tum lanes (subject to traffic monitoring) p^ and separate right turn lanes.) a Lo R 0 • Signalization subject to Collier County Transportation >, Division approval and subject to interconnect and signal t� progression. LO LO • With Golden Gate Parkway/Airport Road grade c separation, left turn access from the Airport Road c eastbound on-ramp to Golden Gate Parkway will be prohibited. (3) CD 04 North Quad — Town Center 2/3 Driveway Eliminated. J a North Quad - + • Full access, "T" intersection under four and six lane 0 Office 2/3 divided roadway. Project dual left turn lanes and separate right turn lanes. o • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if 0 warranted, subject to interconnect and signal a progression. Q LL South Quad — 2/3 • Full access, "T" intersection under four and six lane c Residential/Hotel divided roadway. Project left and right turn lanes. E t U • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if r warranted, subject to interconnect and signal Q progression. a� t • With Golden Gate Parkway/Livingston Road grade separation, left turn access from the Livingston Road westbound on-ramp to Golden Gate Parkway will be Q prohibited. (3) Packet Pg. 1504 9.D.7 6 Livingston Road North Quad - + • Full access under two, four and six lane divided 2/3 roadway. Project left and right turn lanes. Located to align with Wyndemere Entrance. • Signalization subject to signal warrant study. 6A Livingston Road North Quad - + . Separate directional access to FPL parcel. 2/3 6B Livingston Road North Quad - + . Separate directional access to FPL parcel. 2/3 7 Airport Road North Quad - 1 . Full access under six lane divided roadway. Aligned Residential with existing north Poinciana Village Entrance. Project left and right tum lanes. • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if warranted, subject to interconnect and signal progression. 8A Airport Road North Quad — + . Full access, under six lane divided roadway. Aligned Town Center 2/3 with future access to West Quad (Driveway 8B). Project dual left tum lanes (subject to traffic monitoring) and right tum lane. • Signalization subject to Collier County Transportation Division approval and subject to interconnect and signal progression. 8B Airport Road West Quad 2/3 . Full access under six lane divided roadway. Aligned with North Quad - Town Center Entrance (Driveway 8 A). Project dual left tum lanes and right tum lane 8C Airport Road West Quad — 2/3 • Right in and out only access under six lane divided Office/Commercial roadway. (3) 0 Packet Pg. 1505 9.D.7 8D Airport Road North Quad 2/3 • lane,, . Driveway eliminated. 9 Airport Road South Quad — 2 • Driveway eliminated. Residential/Office/ Commercial 10 Livingston Road South Quad — • Driveway Eliminated. Residential 11 Livingston Road South Quad — • Driveway Eliminated. Residential 12 Livingston Road South Quad — 2/3 • Full access, "T" intersection under two, four and six lane Residential divided roadway. (4) • Signalization subject to signal warrant study and, if warranted, subject to interconnect to Golden Gate Parkway. 13 Livingston Road South Quad — • Driveway Eliminated. Residential Footnotes: 1) See Project Access Locations, Golden Gate Parkway Conceptual Roadway Master Plan, Lane Arrangement For Site Access With Interchanges, Sheet 1 of 2, dated April 11, 1989 and revised January 8, 1990, May 23. 1990, June 11, 1990, and May 25, 2000. 2) See Halstatt DRI Master Development Plan. Revised Exhibit 11. 3) Access conditions identified with east/west Golden Gate Parkway grade separated at Livingston Road and Airport Road. Should the final design and construction of the urban interchange be substantially different than that shown in Exhibit 1 with Livingston Road and/or Airport Road grade separated rather than Golden Gate Parkway, the final improvements may result in modifications to the above access restrictions. 4) If Livingston Road is grade separated at Golden Gate Parkway, the full median opening identified at Driveway #12 may be shifted north or south at the time of its construction. Packet Pg. 1506 9.D.7 5/03/90 5/23/90 6/11/90 Revised 5/25/00 Revised 7/20/2017 REVISED EXHIBIT E GREY OAKS PUD/DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER ACCESS CONDITIONS The Grey Oaks DRI shall construct at no cost to Collier County all site -related improvements providing direct access to the Project as deemed necessary by the Collier County Transportation Division including all project access points on Airport Road, Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road and all site -related improvements required within the DRI. The developer's obligation for these improvements shall include the full costs of design and engineering, utility relocation, right-of-way acquisition and dedication (if any), construction of turn lanes, acceleration and deceleration lanes, construction inspection, contract administration, testing and signalization (as needed and warranted). The alignment, design, signalization and construction schedule for these improvements shall be approved by the Collier County Transportation Division. 2. Access to Golden Gate Parkway, Airport Road and Livingston Road shall be limited to those access points and lane configurations as schematically depicted in the drawing titled Project Access Locations, Golden Gate Parkway Conceptual Roadway Master Plan, Lane Arrangements For Site Access with Interchanges, Sheet 1 of2 and dated 4/11/89 and revised 5/23/90, 6/11/90, and 5/25/00 and included as Revised Exhibit 1 and more fully described in Revised Exhibit 2 titled Grey Oaks DRI Project Access Conditions. The modified Project access is presented in Revised Exhibit 1 and Revised Exhibit 2 Changes from the original approved access are summarized below. Revised Access Plan Driveway Original Plan Revised Plan 1 Full Access No Change 2 Full Access, (Later No Change Right In/Out) 3 Full Access Full Access (T Intersection) 3C Not Included 4 Full Access (T Intersection) (Four Way -3A & 3B, Shifted East) n; .i.� r„in„+Eliminated Full Access (T Intersection, Shifted East) Packet Pg. 1507 REVISED EXHIBIT E (continued) 5 6 6A & B Full Access (T Intersection) Full Access Not Included 7 Full Access 8A & 8 B Full Access 8C Right In/Out 8D Not Included 9 Full Access 10 Right In/Out 11 Right In/Out 12 Full Access 13 Right In/Out Full Access (T Intersection, Shifted East) No Change Richt-In/Out No Change Full Access (Shifted North) No Change D ^tion"' ^ e�Eliminated Eliminated Eliminated Eliminated No Change Eliminated It is recognized that ultimate access control is available to local government through exercise of its police powers based on health, safety and welfare considerations. In addition to such ultimate access control, and the access controls identified in Revised Exhibit 2, additional controls could include signal system directional phasing (decreasing side street green) and additional turn lanes. 3. Traffic signals at the Project access points, as warranted, shall be interconnected and coordinated with the adjacent signalized intersections along Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway. In an effort to ensure the maximum signal progression possible along Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, certain green bands for progression purposes have been identified and evaluated by the Collier County Transportation Division. The signal progression bands identified by Collier County reflect Collier County's operational decision to provide preferential treatment to thru movements. This condition means that east/west Golden Gate Parkway thru movements and north/south Airport Road thru movements will be given preference over the Project's intersecting side street movements. 4. Permanent access to Project maintenance buildings shall be reviewed and approved by the Collier County Transportation Division. Access to the maintenance building in the North Quad shall be via Livingston Road. Full or partial access onto Livingston Road shall be dependent on the driveway location, level of service operations on Livingston Road and cross section of Livingston Road. Provided that proper turn lanes are installed and level of service standards are maintained on Livingston Road, full access shall be provided under a two, four and six lane cross section. It is recognized that ultimate access control is available to local government through exercise of its police powers based on health, safety and welfare considerations. In addition to such ultimate access control, additional controls could include signal system directional phasing, additional turn lanes and median closures and restricted turn lanes. Construction access shall be reviewed on a case by case basis by the Collier County Transportation Division. Packet Pg. 1508 Cot[er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 9.D.7 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 )ISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Please complete the following information, if space is inadequate use additional sheets and attach to the completed application packet. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: C. 0 Name and Address % of Ownership O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. 100% Albert O'Donnell 62.5% Patricia O'Donnell 37.5% Stephen O'Donnell 0% the Drooertv is owned by a CORPORATION. list the officers and stockholders and 1 percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership O'Donnell Landscapes, Inc. 100% Albert O'Donnell 62.5% Patricia O'Donnell 37.5% Stephen O'Donnell 0% he If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the eneral and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership 2/21/2017 Page 2 of 16 Packet Pg. 1509 GZer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, LUL, RI IVIUCIJ, UC I I CI I L, I d 11 CJ, VI PCII LI ICI J. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of �ILUIJ, 11 d L,V1PU1dLIV11, Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired 05/2016 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 2/21/2017 Page 3 of 16 Packet Pg. 1510 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL24T170001728- Gray yaks ORI Amendrnen! I, Aleerto•oonn& (print name), as P—denr (title, it applicable) of Uoannel kande-pes.Im. (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owneTOapplicant =contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. l have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorizeQ Grady Mi nor andAssociates, PA to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. Pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " ■ if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the is stated in it are true. ure Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF�� The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on / -�- (date) by o—h 0,44"1 PAY • (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as j[. rf f who is Rersonally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. . ZI STAMPISEAL Signature of Notary Public °kms Notary Public Stale of Flaitle `F Brandi L Pene9utt •• My Commissim FF 989441 "roFnd' ExWes0712212020 CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/24/14 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1511 INSTR 5266784 OR 5273 PG 3586 RECORDED 5/17/2016 1:21 PM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $2,450.00 REC $27.00 CONS $3509000.00 Prepared by and return to: Matthew L. Grabinski, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 239435-3535 After recording return to: Collier Insurance Agency Attn: Brad Stockham 2600 Golden Gate Pkwy. Naples, FL 34105 239403-6869 Consideration: $350,000.00 Documentary Stamps Tax Due Upon Recording: $2,450.00 THIS INDENTURE, made Delaware limited liability compo partnership, whose mailing address favor of O'Donnell Landscapes, l Road, Estero, Florida 33928 ("Gar day of , 2016, by Halstatt, LLC, a it by,conversion to Halslatt Partnership, a Florida general Iden ate Pari way, N ,aples, Florida 34105 ("Grantor"), in cor �a �t ohs, v Osie mailing address is: 4291 Williams U Witnesseth, that said GrAntg� for and in const&#atton�of "'`um of Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuablii�nsideration to saidntor iri,}7anii paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Iia-gr4nted, bargained, and. s4,1 ,to the said Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the fol c N ing,described land; si* e, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to -wit:`" r See Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. And the Grantor does hereby warrant the title to said land and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. The property conveyed hereby does not constitute all nor substantially all of Grantor's assets. SUBJECT TO real estate taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2015; zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; outstanding oil, gas, and mineral interests of record, if any; and restrictions, reservations and easements of record. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. WARRANTY DEED PAGE 1 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1512 OR 5273 PG 3587 9.D.7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: ri Print Name:A� (�pkiI 1M_ 0(iVA� PrintName: {7}SC31LL State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknow by Katherine G. Sproul, as CEO of Hi company, who [,A is personally kho) identification. f [Notary Seal] Halstatt, LLC, a Delaware limited liability > 1 WARRANTY DEED PAGE 2 G. Sproul, 1 , 2016, on behalf of said as 0 a Y O a� /L^ V w v LO 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a 0 0 c 0 ca .Q a a LL c m E r a E M 2 a Packet Pg. 1513 *** OR 5273 PG 3588 *** EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property That part of Tract "E", according to the plat of Grey Oaks Unit Three, Plat Book 20, pages 30-37, of the public records of Collier County, Florida, and all of Tract "E", according to the plat of Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen, Plat Book 33, pages 59-64, of the public records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of said Tract "E", Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen; Thence along the boundary of said Tract "E", in the following three (3) described courses: 1. North 89041157" West 390.00 feet; 2. North 00°31'16" East 2,063.03 feet; 3. North 00°38'02" East 48.23 feet to the southwest comer of said Tract "E", Grey Oaks Unit Three; Thence along the west boundary of said Tra t" ' gitb-.bQ°18'02" East 1,442.72 feet; Thence leaving said boundary South $9°)'8" East 220 00f� Thence North 0038'02" East 43( plat of Grey Oaks Unit Eighteen, ",`Grey Oaks Drive, according to the c records of Collier County, Florida; Thence along said boundary 123.01fedt along the; 41c (6f a r 6n taggeel}fial circular curve concave south having a radius of 253.00 feet th ug a c ntral angle 6f�7°51' 2-" gnd�-being subtended by a chord which bears North 67°51'33" East 121 81j e�to a point of compound curve fry Thence continue along said boundary` 6. .feet along the arc of a circular curve concave southwest having a radius of 50.00 feet through a central anglef 98°50'43"and being subtended by a chord which bears South 48°47'20" East 75.95 feet to a poinf'6n�t-we'stkl ie of Livingston Road as recorded in Official Records Book 2749, pages 697-701, of the public records of Collier County, Florida; Thence along said west line South 00°38'02" West 1,869.16 feet to the south line of said Tract "E", Grey Oaks Unit Three; Thence along said south line of said Tract "E", North 89°37'55" West 0.10 feet to the northeast corner of said Tract "E", Grey Oaks Unit Fourteen; Thence along the east line of said Tract "E", South 00°31'16" West 2,110.81 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. WARRANTY DEED PAGE 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1514 TaTlcc •TMtt INV E ADDIIMMNL aEsmx:Twxs nNr AAE NDi aEE0O0EG OM 1M5 R(Ar 11Mr WY lK FCIRO M E PLBX I2L'WDS a 1Nb LdMTY.' TMS PGT. AS RECORDED M ns CRAPNK FGM. S TIE OFFKf1L OEPTCITON Of E SI/BDINLMD lM.D6 C6riB%D li[RfE1 MAl IRC N Ip CLKVYSTANCFS lC $WPIAMED M AUIIgMY BY AMY O1NER GRAPIMC qP pGIIM RRY OP E PU1. WNFTIRR CRAMLC OR DCTTAL KTIRS-- NRAREO BY: MWEL X. MAXWELL. P.S.M. NO. 1630 WILSONMILLER REGISTERED ENGMEERS ANG WID SURVEYORS N A RE S LCOLIIEF C4TOIAVttFPoRRTORI0.A FXFLURNG Mf OEOILaTNNISE xOLOER�pFIPiwPAREM WCA D AND CRElElSEO LMFCOUNry FROM LAM'µ— LAMSSIN OF —FIE RIGHTS µO fW 1-1 PUAK fACILRY ADEWACY W COUNTY APPROVALS IS —, AA—C BY�THE EHj��wllG RfNE1L ERVICESti PMTMCNi OF COILIEF pLyNtt, OF flLg:; WS�r C�uLKII{P..E.. S•SEENRI PROJECT MANAGER COLLIER —.. ENGINER ,y COS M D, p ME CWUR —1 ATTORNEY TNR f.L"'MY OF "GG— COLLIER O C TC w U COLLIER — ATTORNEY THISSIR114NIR THIS PGi RENEWED A.D. COLLIER COUMY SLNRIEYIXL THIS 3`_R GY Of RICK GRGG, COUNTY COMMISSION APPROVAL 5 PUT APPROKD FOR RECORDING IN A REGULAR YE -NG BY i)I� BWtD �E r .Ow aNERS OF _,_ THATC_, _, RORIOA, T l 3L.GIT (EE. THE THE CLERK OEICIR_CJUO'G,WR! OE CgLR COUNTY, IS M AIRtS S *O.��Y/LLATYMA�Q. G— E BFOLK BEAFD OE JAIL , CONMISISOiOn FILING RECORD CIXUER Go—.. RORIDA HAT THIS PUT HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY LIE AND THAT IT COMPLIES M FORM MTIH THE REC—LENTS OF CHAPTER I)], LAWS Of THE STATEOFFLAT-OR M EIIREHER CEI a(IN.E]pIT�NS�P.UT� AD ANFORD WLY RFCOlOEO M PUI BOOK PGRIEACES SL_. IIIROVGH yE-. Of THE PUB RECORDS O<WLLIEF CWNtt, O+Zi•16. d,aM Iks9lN Clot TITLE CERTIFICATION DESCRIBED AND (IND THE TITLE VESTED M THE NALSTATT PARTNEHSHIP.. A ROMEAMGGENERAL PARTNFRSHIP. AD 1AILOFEM WES FOR ME PHOKR IS NOI ECN D Br Mlv MORTGAGE /f RORIG BAR NUMBER JBT 1 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE IT 4 HEREBY CRRFIED THAT THIS PUT RAS PREPARED FROM AN ACTAIL OFORIDA CHAPIERNIFS 0 ENO DATA SI1UTEES. IT IS —CERTMED THAT ALL IML, BE SET -1. i0 HELORDNG THE PUT AND P.C.P.'s AND LOT CORNERS AS SHOWN HER£W EXIST OR MTLLOR i0 FINAL ACCEPTANCE 1 AND IFWT MEM SIZE ICON AND M4IFRNL AFF LWFECDYHSHOWNUTA``SroN PROYTDED IN cI TJ 2]. la')I IG s— r" TATURS. WIISW. YMIEI%� IDN&. jFT4 E.C. CHACL MANWLSL,. u� WTFD GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN A REPLAT OF PART OF TRACT "H" OF "GREY OAKS UNIT THREE", PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 30-37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING A PART OF SECTIONS 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LOCATION MAPS INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SD'o:LMa : LNr LEE y& E FORE �.NSTRGMEUT RAS ACKNOwLE m B 2 BEFORE ME THIS 3-- NYG, COLLIER SPROUL999,1 T, -11 uIw"OFIZCO GENEAS TIUL GdCRr10iERME OF THE HALSTATT PARMRSHIP, WHO IS wkww OR NAG PRODUCED AS L" r- *&.* SIGNATURE ERSON TAKMC 'NOWLEDGEMENT lura C. Hendry NMAE OF ACKNOWLECGER TYPE EEP.�RIIN/N�TE•D _OARY STA!MP\\EO J�1p�pl,N YNW tTSi1 TITLE OR • Mr MU NBEOF. If ANYwe,.A,NA v m�i°w I,a INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CWNtt OF [COLD THF iORE�QINf INSIWMRT WAS ACNNOWLEGGEGG BEFORE ME MIS At%yi DAY OF 99E9.� HARDIDMU UNDER THE RILL OGT, EDNH C O IL SPRWL BARRW COLLIER, JR., WLY AUTHORIZED CENElNL FARMER OF THE HMSTATT PARMENSHIP, MHO IS OR WHO NAS PRODUCED J-N� SAe"URE OXAS i TaxMG ACKNOwuocFMRr ACKNOw1EDGER TYPED, PRINTED OR STAMPED _�Q7j�i(7A alt • TITLE OR NN SMyFW�MISSroNCR� EXRR 5. VOTES AND 9.D.7 DEDICATION PLAT BOOK 33 , PAGE54, cIME Df RORIEA SHEET 1 OF 6 WNm a couIEa KNOW iNFSE RESFu15 IINI HM STArt RAR—P. A ORIpA GENERAL PARERSMP, THE OMNER OF E UNC DESCRIBED HEREON INS CAUSED THIS PUI ENTULM ' GREF OAIES — FOURIER " TO BE MACE ANO DOES EREBY DEgCATE E —LO RNG: 1. U Ox£Y OAKS RNOPENIY OMMRS A550CNiroN. MG. ML ROTI RIGHTS Of WAY SWE BEMC SHOWN AS TNCT 'A', AND E YAMIENANCE THEREOF SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS NRFAfTER SE/ FORTH AND FURTXER SUBJECT i0 AN GSEMEM M FAVDR OF ME ABOVE FEFCRFNCEO OWNER AND ITS SUCCESSORSAND ASSIGNS. FOR INGRESS, EGRESS —1. GRMNAGE. CALBE TEIENSION, INSTALLATION OF sC , SrSTE IS AND COUMUNM iWN LINES APPURTENANT THERETO, AND OTHER RFaSOUVEG USES WHICx WAY BE CONWCTEO OR NAINTANEG WIT MN THE READ RIGHT M WAY, v EO ALL uas BY SUCH UTIUtt PPoWDFRS —I W SUBIECi i0 µ'O NOT INCWSISrEM MTH USE BY COLLIER C-1 OR THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SERER DISG4LT AS A C.— To .U.E. Z. TOG�ORIG POWER & LOM COUPMEY. UEATED TELEPHONE COMPANY ARD TO OTHER Ur— GR•CTCSR' D THEIR �iEIEKNCCSGTWtta � EASETS �ET)(UE.) OYER. ACROSS ANO UNDER ANO MNNffWNC1 OE EIR —I— — —I—. ALL USE BY THE ABOVE UMOY RRCNDERS SHML BE SUBJECT TO AND NOT INCONSISTENT NTTH USE BY COLLIER COUNTY AND E COLLIER CWNIY NATEIL-SEWER gSlRKI. J. TO ANY AUTHORRED COUNTY FRANCHISED CAIME N PRONOER. ITS SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS AN SUBSHONFIES. A NON-EXCLUSNE —1 CA9EMEM (UC) OYER, •[ROSS AND UxDER iR 111 Fpa E PURPOSE OF CGVSrRUC1ON. — GDW, MMNTE c aN0 WSTIOIC . MSTMLATON. MYNTENANCE AND OPERAIIOT9 Of CABLE iELEVISroN SNO SUCH SNALL INTERFERE WITX E fKIU1IE5 AND SERWCE Of COLLIER COW 1. COWER C-1 RATER -SEWER OISGVCi, RORIDA ROWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND UNITED TELEPHONE CWPANY OR OTHER PU&O D IN SUBSIOMRIES MN MN4GEIHT'rC FRAIES OFCANOTHER PUBLIIITS CS, ASSIGNS OR UTIUIY. THE FRANCHISEE ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHAI.I BE SOLELY RESPoNSIBLE FOR SND OUNCES. PRORGWOED� —ER R TINT ECASEMENT —E. ME ORNERS MF (1WM INAT SUCH E SEMENT IS NO LONGER REQUIRED TO BE FRONDED BY E CABLE COMMUNKATroNS PdJCY ACT Of SAID ACT. ",ANG FL 3OMEANGo SGNTES lµ]].09(9, OR SIGNED URE�UGE O TO REPLACE SAID SIATLIE. OR INE EVENT SAID ACT AND ES ARE IN M-- BY A CART OR CWRrs Of COMPETENT JURSOICTIOH. M " DISIRMT AN ACCESS 1111—TH—FRANCOVER AND ACROSS TRACT /YSFORCTH SOLE PURPoSE OF PERYITTNG EMERGRGY VEHICLES i0 GATH ACCESSTO AL EXISTING ANO foTUaE TRACTSANO LOTS OHI IHC GREY OAKS S VISION. 5. TO ME CITY OF NARES A U VY EASENE'NT (.E) OVER, ACROSS MJD UGFNDER RL f T'M FORLIME PURPoSE OF INSTMLAiroN AND MMMf— WRN E COWER G= WATER GSCYRI CANNOT BC USED INCW 1— SEWER dSrRKT MID COLLIER COUT1tt GSEYENrs. 6 TO GOLLKR CO_ RATER-sEWCR MSTMCT - — SEWER ACRITES IANAN G LE CIRSCREOUMfo (i1' THE MC IAPhILABLf LAND CCOML -ENT RECUG- ]. i0 —LKH — MATER- SEWER— - A COUNN LIT— GSEMENT (C.U.E) OKR, ACROSS AND LANDER ALL W TRACT - AND ALL OTHER GOWN =2 EASEMEM3 EC.U.E.) OR THE PURPoSE OF MGTATLA N. I ANDD LIYIIiENANCL Oi SEWER fACw"S ANO AN ACCESS EASE- L I (OC). WITHOUT RESPOxSIBILTY FOR WLMENANC£. B. 10 GREY S RRI_RIY OWNERS ASSOCADON, INC. RIM NAINTENANiN R£SPWGNNLRY COUNtt — N'O WVNTE C RESVON51BItm ALI U OY EASEMENTS ACCESS EAYYENrs (AE.). DRMeNGE EA FG (DE). LANUSCARE EIIFFR EASENEN, MMNGEAND MEN SYSTEMS SWYLCAR ClliE (4RESPoNSI) .L E GREY OANSCPRORERtt OWNERS ASSOLNION, MC THE FEE OWNER OF THE (ANDS WOERYMG E OPNN4Gf —RENTS 4AINIRANCE —ANG LUOSCVF L4UFER LASFYFNrs NE'RCW ANLL BE ENRRFD ro RACE NNRgfA[Mrs W OR OKR SUM LANDS RIttUON.G Bur IlOT NCCESSIRN.Y IMIIED TO WIOSGPING. AKEPATHS. GOLF CAR! PATHS DECOP u WMLS AND FENCES, SIGNSSUCH IMPROVENENR THAT W NOT MIERBfEIFt CR- — USE vNPCx S FOR E Po TC GUKFN INE ""E RIM ELE„Ea3 Of APPROYM AND 9. M GRANTEES OF THE DwN ER=NTS ANO YAMTENYICF EAUMENrs TO E EI(IEM TNi SIKH /ASFu[Nrs AI+f LOGIFD MT MIN ANY TRACT LN r OO 'Ga. . SNV1 IXAY BE PERWIIEO i0 — SUCH OFTS GB(IEO'W ANLL Bf fxDi1£D N ALL OTHER GMFUL LAYS SUCH PRDPEFrvtDi TRACWSISnM MTM Rus PUI AND APRKAMLC RESIm'LTKNS OF IEECONO. THIS PARAGRAP IS MIENWO ro CIARMY NOT — E DEgG— MAGE HRA. INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF FLORIDA CWNN Of co— THE FORE4DING iNSiftUMEM AS ABEFORE ME �Y THE '�. E THIS ��r LLOYD G. xORY, TRUSTEE EAY OF 1999, BY JULIET G SMAS TRUSTEE W THE EWH COLLIER sPROUL TRUST ANO AS TRUSTEE UNDER THE WILL OF �ftOx COLLIER. JRI. DULY AUM041ZE0 GENRM PARTNER Cl THE PRODII COPARMERSe IP, AStl(yQjii Y - INROLO S —1M , iR TEE s jt: T� .�Oa�^ C OF—NOWLRGER TYPED, PRINTED OR STAMPED rMe a N! AE :71 AG 1S TET L. SPROUL AS TROSTEC K.4. FONN CIXUER SPROUL) -T V - M SERA. UMBER. I Y AS ML pF E 1RUST£ES OF THE Mr ro4urssroN EXPIRES: INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE Of ROIxEA EDITH cauER sPRDU[ TRUST UNDER AGREEMEN GED n. DECEMBER 1969. GENERM PAFMR OF NAtSIArt RARTMRSxro COUNTY Ol' COLLIER E fOREGOIO--NC INSTRUMEM WAS MHA,:YRroWLEWEO BEFORE ME TINS µyr 999. BY INE G SR�UI. 9 iiEUGEN BARHON � COLLIR. JR. Wtv UMOM2f0 GENERAL UNDER THE WILL OF COLLI PARTHR OF THE NALSTAR PARERSIN,. TlG�, OOORR`— HAS PRG 0 _ . AS IDErvnrlGiroN HAROLD S. I—K IRUS E 'o'er SIGNATURE OF PERSON TMI G ACKIO WEMENT 'n.uEa�.. KA ERMF G. SPRgR. —'IMP U _ yE�l��Ly�� ER POR GChNEl1D75 TITLE PR AK YR41 UMBER, IT ANY EI L. SPftOUt ASTEE N,CGMMISSroN EXPIRES. —. J ALL Of ME TRUSTEES OF E JULIET C. SPROUL UNDER E R BARON I.R. IAL, DECEASED GENERM P HMSTArt PARMERSHx• SON r xTrNEss: RINr`�M swN TAIL RITWSS: PRINT LWIJ C. � � rV SIGN MTE55: PRAT �� yyr xTTNFss S I nDWEIB! S SKN �In'11Kw E\M7A'\ NTNE55: PNMT (� 11LL SIGN VMA A C.4MN MTNE55. PNMT 1llEl1A9 SONJ11,a WITNESS: PNMTIEFMIr y sKN DAs,N M.1/Al.� MTESS�AIAr—ME MEA�ic - M1I—, PRMT� jNAR. AGN Oi."., MTHE55. PRMT 1IEMAS RI��- m NEs . LFAANN WORN ON��TRESS. PRINT A LEMS !-, .y Y 0 V 1 00 O O O O N J a O Iq It O WI CL 0- E E u m Q Packet Pg. 1515 LEGAL DESCRIPTION er D"says B °,� e/ Ry�'na z: ntl WOc� ee ro Sec 0136'OY Ecsl .4 /«t f° o por I on s G°Cr YnBOM Uwlnm BB 1]55 W«t tT0.09 ol°Beg�neinq o tIVJf I`weat T1I0.er real, rnNBYe 'ST w at 111T.�eN Cols F Sk I y WP ff wee OR. JR B7 a nw n Hgnt-of-u'oY line o/ Coken °o me aer,«e aooa. IeoV 1117 1 iwgnai t TT1. 6 - Non" s DteMe 11 IT E`n .6 1T 1- 1.91 015 4Jr 6�99`«.aif 1o1101a'o' q .11 I"'- E«t T1978 r«r: fnence Nonnro0blf'S4 fast 0051 /«I. once « wn9 t« .....6w° `" 69 NI 454 sI9J6�..1] /eet 60 para+ i coshes le g .e c xw1�3S5J'38 Eoal 8400 /eel. ISS 6Ja�b el e5'S bTT°ona -1 el«ee y ttnlrol oalb or Ir JeV9' anq De g subl«eetl by ' 511948 Ee.l°�sss$ke I2.0 ace g on,N1 c SY58°ane 1, 9eouneo r aero G Opxa Uwt mDleen in Ise relron'y reuse« hscneee n SI9.40 h y o _ M vinq or SJ0.00 lase t ° e,9eleet o°/ m9<'b''IN,6ECerww ee M c teas S °Ee wsryM.5.00� et MrougnsfeI,1 yytonp«BJ6'SPwW bewgO°`�eWeP ^ ° n Deus Sou 1TOr'11'eEosl J4J�Bi I a enc nen 8DT0] leer a arc ale wi ensu, car,cow ro e e«Iroi engk°e/ 1Z2942'ulone m9 uet«ecce � `cnwe OiYiY410 es s c cnwo q ° 5s"E 89«1 Po,°^ t e«6W av ,YOw rq s9o9' seiol$1 «I, J9er «e 9 bMW.e b'«n` 0o r the rcc or'00'a8'JO'roe° umq su norlrg o 6'IO°i oE^et19. 21W %e'I _0 RPolangl' 1' 72 Z 6x1'9 1. ]8 le°un 264809 East 31.90 «. �n r5ouln Ib'35 �6Et[esl^J�66� `'52'S0"^one Dei,N ES Pol l`Book JI, popes )6-]]1 IN. .1 0 n P scntee W Won or Toro M o96t.1 __.I s .I Co.5ittlil'9' - ,D ,A, og188'04'JY `a >O.1Iro .nam north Deep uln 4`V:9 xazl ,gM1pe olrtwar o awlrol oyb '1o185 aT'44'LU e ° q lenge y GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN A REPLAT OF PART OF TRACT ""HH" OF "GREY OAKS UNIT THREE PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 30--37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING A PART OF SECTIONS 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTINUED B)`r tn98 to TUKOg �n torgemg�° reverse "08'15 J6 cw« u�rvmsm PLAT BOOK 33 , PAGE SHEET 2 OF 6 ewDe� :Agya61T �r lbs rt.Ar � a B.T°G 10) y061.49 "'T TS'IO'00'laon being s°OY 9 cigor wni sl:no°o`le ^ b1« 11)� I,1 cnwe wnrcn w0�n`n`tBY-119" Ec>r°]96'Tc9 he�ro3o p'ww' •o/ 12) ` 1]JJa/« Wonq to hounq aO9ed a el f25.0Ut arc °19 o/c99'JB'S5" oW b.rrg NObN 6e5645`o snore enwn sews Norm 1T08�J1 cat 90�9I / re to tW 1)11 Y Ecst I]1 >5 /W : 9 o 3.1e' a`o"s o oBHen T P '1; i lerr99 o o' v e e xnw GENERAL NOTES. 5) J `"T were"I 4000 lee Y East 2B 28�ee1, 9° ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET" D DECIMALS ERE - 16) NIR', In 66'36'SYD E,St 26'60 I«I t I o rongenbW ub ow I t" 2. • =PERMANENT REFEREN.E MONUMFM SET S AMPCD 1 9 P.R.M. {' 4650 e nq ^0 550.00 %ea S�ou� or 2159'09' one bn'nq` O = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT FOUND STAMPED I,y] S E«t 1 121e�eel: P.R.M. /4650 8) = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT - STAMPED P.C.P. 1d 11 9) a y540�e9°eiee a kwgen— circoror cww concow to ne scorn no 9 AND WILL BE PLACED IN ACi.ORDANCF O SEE,- 1] .091 (8). n, 111 Y4TIY ^n0� oaueNmea'DY o cnoM rin FLORIDA STATUTES 25. Tt`i`rJe �S"9Eoat J6T0 IRR I. ° an Cry Ooke - SET IRON PIN & CAP STPMPED LB -4J. Td' LONG n° Iw mql lne Wuneory W aoro h Weng Inv sou ry I sero wey J. ALL LINES ARE RADIAL TO CIRCULAR CURVE UNLESS NOTED �'ey 0e " .R." NWGTED NOT RAMAL. Imo« a tor,genl p1 Wmub" a saw to :ne 4. PP.O.C.O.B. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 51'09' one belr,g .= POINT OF BEGINNING C.U.E. - COLLIER -1 UTILITY EASEMENT 2) U.E. = UTILITY CASEMENT wl 58.34 tcet obn9 I D.I. DRAINAGE EASEMENT o" a:nq atm ^'u^off 9.'ret "` E. MAINTENANCE EASEMENT orc`al «ge 1 TD.E. - TEMPORARY DRAINAC'E EASEMENT J4'19'11Y I EoaLtr'B.J ee ore ..c m T.A.E - TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT oulI, 32 « q ry W sae lacy OBna UN, P.B. - PLAT BOOK, P - PAGE 1 n on M boo G.C. = GOLF COURSE In Won^esei uM IN— r«I to the Pam of g q O.R. OFFICWL ECORD BOOKU �M1S«Port qI T„. CLUG� 5 L P.R.C. = POINT OF REVERSE c RIATURE 'be0o P.C.C. POINS OF COMPO " CUT ATURE wry IRP w .aa ° L.B.E. _ nen« okeq `the °Wuceery ka Une M. < 1) , r°North `eoBew'e1Js9407 12 e « 1 W,_,r, WC°nlrol q. oT 199 `wJJel 0H I ,!_; �E'J2EUaenwmg° sue�enaea544 In 61 f 11 M. shwaN. fi Ieef o ore wl circa urw rp I«f <enI. nM1, °OJ22' n, I, ° OJ0.00 b �ne 3Y� mugs o 1629J' ee�I636 heal �B�]6 iorgeMnlmlSa°nr`iNrcuo : nco"VOveblo«JeE ey NC, 62eJ0 �l n'9C2J'W°w«I`"e59.331 reN b 1 5point ace+ aatl r w r ors rtn 4825'55' fear 209.II /cel. n989'SS'W' EoaleT02 OT I.cecry o 1 -1,w«1 I]o.72 r«I M p ,n 1 «ro eY oa:a obey Inc W°naery e/ «la Or, Oel:a we Tan«n rn In. Taw q a,. WaeW W 00 `;° sor:m 'g'rlo' w«1 10. e°sdo.D3o'r«i°`1,ww°wpp,.r`i`� on°b°eP`To s'.`�e-WeTe ern9`a° i� a:e i1y"P"� aePronq P ) re P501n 03W ]'4Y5West/ ]I Mel; p)oc"e ale 4L0..1$ loles5toulIo`x5nnIMa8w al`JB.,J4°I1ar�1 S6o 615"fe'1'eler,eae1, r°ewy1`a9I2 6""9q I«J2e 39I«III. c6)102e180I to InP anpy" ° -1 V eaglminq .1 IN, Par«1 neem 5, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS OF RECORD ETCSEQ,, PUBLIN IC RECORDS OF COIIC� RECORD OLLLLIIER COUNTY. FLDB� 1 6. NE CENTERLINE OF PAVEMENT RANGES IN ELEVATION FROM A LOW OF 10.14 TO A HIGH OF I I.. PER DESIGN PUNS. THEA RAG " E C GROUND EI -110, LAND IS APPROXIMATELY 10.00 WHICH R NATURAL NSURAN T E LAND , WIMIN FT` P ZONN X AS PER FLOOD INSURANCE NATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL BER 1006] OJ85 0 GTED JUNE 3 1986. ALL f"1929. OMS ARE BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC VERiICgt WTUM, 919. REFER TO BOSTNCU� NT RATE EDITION. PS ARE SUBJECT i0 CHANGE, PER DESIGN GLCULATIONS(( aOUTH )FLORIDA PERMIT) IDU YEAR J DAY ZERO DINIE. LF oD, "NAATION (FTf NCV�DJ 1 0�' MAVIMI3M RECOMMENDED ], OFFSET P.R.M.'S ARE RADIAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. Packet Pg. 1516 S N F E T 6 I I I� I I ON T6 r ITwY 6E ram0 IMI a� -A ods W 'S was.OESc xE.PEix .4m Xtli. pgcuw'rAxcLs eE wPPwnm M AOIIgPoIY 9Y ANY on NR DRMMC dt ipN oT nC PIAT. NN— WNPNF pP ppIAL rsnmoNDoau"a S amnas J— EY AECO PLAT BOOK --'Z, PAGE (p� GREY OAKS UNjfT FOURTEEN SHEET s OF 6 A REFLAT OF PART OF 7[c, .. .. 11 Y OAKS \ UNIT THREE", PLAT BOOK 20, PACES 3C-37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING A PART OF SECTIONS 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA N iMN./, � �� D1tEY MR LM IMFF NOT PLATTED I n I — I= I —_ Im � NOT PLATTED T31WOL�R =IY \w I I ��\ \\\\\ LMNGSTON FOAU POINT OF COMMENCEMENT SE CORNER OF SEC77ON 24 CONTAMMG 4.95 AQZ1- C 1 POW OF S E E S H E E T 4 - Packet Pg. 1517 GREY OAKS UNIT THREE TRACT 'GC -6' (PIAT - 20. °ACEs 3p TNRN 37) GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN a.M�n ai<ios�m « a�T6szw:bs A REPLAT OF PART OF TRACT "H" OF "GREY OAKS Rr.Ab UNIT THREE", PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 30-37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A BEING A PART OF SECTIONS 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA 361.25 CURVE TABLE P.R.C. TRACO ' G C- 1 0' - M.E. B9'S5 IAl ' 1 , � \\ _ ,m6 �p,5•_-PR 1 • o•W W'H'STw. FR W (OE LwF 5 _ JO' EeSEut Kaa'Jsm•w 9J) \ \\ ro, JJ'r;Jyp aNr OF mew 1-. 0) J9' 11' 1-' .14 44J''' 4..44 S:S'1JI 1W a8 f10.18' 66 'l95GWW..eg4' 884.0' O 06..1fi561• ' IiSr8 B'E. Z P.R.C. 11:z' J . 1JJ' 21,21 ' 0:p zze'' 90.8]' NS:JJS6iJ1TTCE. K1rs5srE. i30.ro'2111-, 3035' 118'1 W 888.93• \I JU..29' x OB'JO'E. :fiT05'18•E. S.�iS .�' i8 �9p.05 16 110:x' w 3w: m' 15.00' 24 9'59' 2-.": 84x'19 W w o N 21.1 B' - -2 4- 1JsiB JT w. 'J6'W. . 6'J4'4!'W. .68'JO'44'W. 5'56-rJ�g•W. 1J 41'500' B8 54 r 061 S1 - 00.18-20' 141 IBJ: 14' 1) 0 4 .J66J689'' 10):0' 4- 4 10' sbS6a' J6866' ; 604- \ Q) r' I I m I I t i. t9r ,s e:5o'u•rB'E. �y�R co, ` �A, ryp .8'xo9 1 ]1' 9 8 6 4 r' I 0.' J1 ' J2 35 J 81515'N011' I N CO 951u09689)0.. 49 1r''' 0.TRI CT '0 " o 1 1142'40E rr"'EwwEE.. tm rs 0 ` wr re 5.69'0-2'-2521. O.E. AND \JJ M.E. >Q ii I Cl ' 10J CIRC)\'( 4J B�OT00 Q. -- PLAT BOOK b!l , PAGE SHEET 4 OF 6 9.D.7 I I I ^ 1 CURVE TABLE H I I I I I I I IAl ' 1 OEt,a �1'''J156'• I I l a l Ta. 1 9J) NG C5NY:6g609R'1=Ogl''.B4499FSYM''wwWwP.... 013.0 z5211.06606 3 I6 1' 5Y 01Y0 1-. 0) J9' 11' 1-' .14 44J''' 4..44 S:S'1JI 1W a8 f10.18' 66 'l95GWW..eg4' 884.0' O 06..1fi561• ' IiSr8 B'E. 55ro: 12 o• 0'ro9 3s's 11:z' J . 1JJ' 21,21 ' 0:p zze'' 90.8]' NS:JJS6iJ1TTCE. K1rs5srE. i30.ro'2111-, 3035' 118'1 W 888.93• 96' 166.01' JU..29' x OB'JO'E. :fiT05'18•E. S.�iS .�' i8 �9p.05 16 110:x' w 3w: m' 15.00' 24 9'59' 2-.": 84x'19 W 61.49' 23996' 64030' rf'zlzi 21.1 B' - -2 4- 1JsiB JT w. 'J6'W. . 6'J4'4!'W. .68'JO'44'W. 5'56-rJ�g•W. 1J 41'500' B8 54 r 061 S1 - 00.18-20' 141 IBJ: 14' 1) 0 4 .J66J689'' 10):0' 4- 4 10' sbS6a' J6866' ; 604- WSJ845E. 1i9s4YY1 .2J .. 1 11 2..: .18:.1- -0. 1-2 .8'xo9 1 ]1' 9 8 9W -- SW41'EE. 2J6 J1 ' J2 35 J 81515'N011' 114 951u09689)0.. 49 1r''' J?0I>-24J819.:..1B4988I0''' 1 1142'40E rr"'EwwEE.. 105r11'39,''0'19OJ-285YB3B''''5J-2''J411S1Y431''" a %OB 0.6) >Q ii 5SSS0N11W1�S58''OJ144T85'o3tlJ0 W 'Y,0'0 10 4111TE51 ' 10J 4J B�OT00 54 '55 ea 111 5.4'5 1•-21',. SJ4']826E OT40'S� .52 26.41 52.19 I I I I I 9.D.7 I I I ^ 1 I H I I I I I I I I n I I l a l I i s -- - - - - -- -- --__--------)003- 14 �'» W TRACT \ - 5660/'-21'21 5.11OJ� E \\ i o i 8 / t9r ',,W. \ pj TRACT "NGC-6r"MIR m.\l `est 1.R z°Rtr P.ccd•\ �, a i a i o ro,E. R __- l\ T R A C r ' 0C- 10 \� TRACT 'D" L.D.B., C.U.B. k D.B. I I I I I I I O.F. Ax0 u.E \ A�, ^ \ SWM VHF rRnC!'M Gfv Pixy UMI MRF, 241 30 -- - - - - -- -- --__--------)003- 14 �'» W TRACT \ - w a i - - - p0' ---21 5.6109'15',. / tm rJ / 4l Sf E' N1J'OJOS21 - - - - - - j \ M A C L I N E \\ of SEE E E r L-_-__--' o,m a I zo' B.f. R ME- K119t35�W I tm a I m a� AViICL •IIIFAE MAY EE A0011KKUE RESRRIC91OR5 ON, APE WT FEroROEO P ,C_ ' • " ss. oN n9s nA, - - eE - m - ROBUC REDS w Ixrs couvn.• INS PIAT, AS RflbRDED W IIS QRIPIIIC FORM. 6: ,RE Ofi1LNF OEPICIrON a THE su¢onwEB tyros OESGttIBm NEIb]N Agro Wiu w Np aRcuuscrAeEs eE ANIspW11' m RA' OMW OPAPMC OR OAJ,AI PORN OP IRE IYAT wxEMW ORAp11C t suPPIArRm x e.R.c.� ORO AL Qq TRACT G C - 1 I MSi 1 W 1 \V ` \ .m re 1 'Q10• u.r. --� / � \I K5� roO? f. wr s IL R+uMENT -11.LL. w1P EPA 8 IL C50M1LLE� P 5. 11 0. 4110 I \I I 1 mi 9r Y torn a q. E`5aNEERs A.vo p s RVEVOR.6 -2300 eArLEY IAA, RPoRi NAMES,. Ar Al COWER COUNTY, FtOPoDa w n � \ l , MATCHLINE � �ti Opi �3 •P°q1 ------------- T T E S H E E T 5 - ---------- -- \ Ei' Packet Pg. 1518 I ` I yRACTI"E' I I I TRACT 'D" L.D.B., C.U.B. k D.B. I I I I I I I - POINT OF BBCDwm I I 1 I I I _ INT .;.n9'J1'ss'E -----._-__-- 641.81' I --I \ Im uE \ I I I I I I �'» W TRACT TRACT -IS- weeggrTTo SOM F. AY AUW - ---------- -- \ Ei' Packet Pg. 1518 TRACT `GC -8" (LS. k M.E.) 69 160.00' JTJ-e IDS II' JO 190.00' 91'0)'07 10116' 31.35' 10326• 93.71' 271.31' S69YM•26W. SIZ22'2rW. CURVE iABLE SHEET 5 OF 6 i i 71 116.00' 91'07'07 39i.11' M 156.00' 1711.39• 11.26' GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN SIZ11'1TW. S81'3825W. NO. LA RA0U5 ;2sm• _TA 21'3 W' ARC u'si iaN 1 CHORD 1).18' S1 CHORD BLAB/NL Slii' IIT A REPLAF OF PART OF TRACT "H" OF '"GREY OAKS 2 .o.00• I5 -'IT' 108.80• 1&6.92• 1&2J• suIII.16W O UNIT THREE", PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 30-37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF \ S=0 S�T•E. SSOI9'16E. a.00• 1000' 81.02, 6 ef•O2'JS• 3128' 5658' Jose' +&.39• .- 5).98' S -14'w. s.871J'1.•W. BJ 100.00' °658'58• 210...3077' B. 2100• 811S1Jv1•1.16M..212]5.25S,OZI3IOJ7roro'1Y7I'EEE o COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A BEING A ART OF SECTIONS 24 AND 25, \ 5 6 60000' 60°.00' 2745'11• 0179'25 28&88' 9.rr• 1 ]50' 286.10• 9:56• &n• NM XJ .. NS71o•rrw' .10' I.M' 180.71' 26&f6• M.71' ISSJS' TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA -17 7 B 60000' 600.80' S29'J6 7)6`06 1 3P 2&11' M.95 1,098' 6..M' 2&21' .6 ,1 ."W. .JB')2'JrW .61'0151•[. N.31'55•SSE � N O��R 9 10 259.00' 250.00' J51J'Ir 6wi6X6 16111' 2)1.09' 81.10' IM...5 155.95• 238.16' S. 1,'JO'1,•E. 5.-1.2rS. - - - - - - - - - G 98 200.00• I851'2r 60.08' 99 1.5.00' )1'18.16 ZA \ 11 M.W' )5,'09.35 10762 1],.36• 77.97• NN)'l'S�C. 101 1.106H'S5 7.10' 103 Im..00' 610226• 301' 119 Ss' 21656' 7 71' IJ5.9J' N 00'W. N.78J0'JB•W 8'2 )J 25.00' 600.00' 8612716' 0353'15 9819• 9J. )6' 21.25• 91". 16.61' 9306' KOSM'SSE. M A T C H L / N / �. )1 )S 2]6.00' MOO' JS).'Or J5)J'IY 160.09' )1711' 82.11' 131.86' M.22' 111.89' N)359'05W. 5.11']0')1'E. Q lol �6 (aT / LOT 18 16 17 205.05 150.00' 6715')! 1312'13 210.6X 8782' IJ4J1' 22].03' ,5.21' 86.51 S.JT11').""W.------- S.Sf0 'W. C E E ----��- �-� �� -�� SHEET �- --�0•: '� 19 20 ;M.0°O' 80.00• 61:6'186 TJ3YY 21259' 149.62' 120.66' 0.15' M.JS 113.16' S.JT26'15•W. .2T2.'25W. / (N,. \ ;66'rW 5 N8716'0Lrw 109.)1' L6 N5116'OrW. 120.08' 21 22 180.00' 110.00 70`01'13 3XI1ror 61.07 M81' 31.86' 62.75' 9151' 111.10' S.61•f,'J6W. S.iS59YNYE. i '1mW.LL 13 24 132.00' 626.00' JX ).ro.T 0531•.5 10,.18' 9119' 1 05.05 ' --X IBM' 9110' 1 S. 5'59100•£. S.OSO,'SS'W. ODI) 10' 0F. k M.E. (OT 15 ^ b\ LFDE TRACT `GC -8" (LS. k M.E.) 69 160.00' JTJ-e IDS II' JO 190.00' 91'0)'07 10116' 31.35' 10326• 93.71' 271.31' S69YM•26W. SIZ22'2rW. a SHEET 5 OF 6 i i 71 116.00' 91'07'07 39i.11' M 156.00' 1711.39• 11.26' 250.81' 35).11' I— 31.19' SIZ11'1TW. S81'3825W. � 13 161.0°' 8059'19• 251.82' 1, 115.00' 8121'11• 221.32' 110.01' 21299' M0.13• 51558'2TW. S-12'2rW JS 80.0°' 5527.11• 2111' 76 110.00' ) 6'Sr 596.21' 1452' 0- 1001.01' ,29.80' S -12-2X. S.)MIO•S1'W. II rB/Cl" CU.E., D.E. JJ 220.00' 24'0927 9275' 22000 7..OB' 9201 )21.86' SBX '4Sw. O 79 220.00' 540m 9'188• 221.11' BO 200.00' 3517'58' -I—— 21118' 9..83' S=0 S�T•E. SSOI9'16E. 81 200.00' OB'09'Sr 18 .50' B1 ZOo.W, .1`09'07 150.61• 8.18 14.27' • MM' 1+7.09• S.SSSS1,•E. 1J51Iro1•f. I BJ 100.00' °658'58• 210...3077' B. 2100• 811S1Jv1•1.16M..212]5.25S,OZI3IOJ7roro'1Y7I'EEE 12' 21.1' SS.OTS .. � B2005 M 210.°0' 39'18'11• 113.89' M1' 16.01• 1'291' s.541)'JB'E. BJ 110.00' 0X52'29• 1.20' 68 200.00' 84'/1'15" 29393' B9 20°.01' 38'56'17 )15.91' .10' I.M' 180.71' 26&f6• M.71' ISSJS' SBI'Sl'S8•£. S.41-a3•E. S6.•053r£. 4 90 10000' 851'55 66.0.1' 91100.00' 26'20'13• 91.96' 3312' 65.71' 16.81' 91.16' SSS10.12•E. 11731'20•£. _ C 92 80.°0' 101.16'12• .5.59' 95 210.00' 6728'10' 595.18' 102.89' 2431' )561.91' 115.°4 .61'0151•[. N.31'55•SSE � 91 300.°0' 515)`07` J 4' 95 205.00' 1851055• 664.16' 16413' 29°.61' -1110.90' 109.50' N.2&19'JSW. NM- 1.3 -W 10' VO(OT L SEM(Nil 96 500.00' 15'18'21• -.11108.6)' 97 150.00'T5.'2T 209.x• 1&5.15' .07 203°0• S.2S3T15W'. - - - - - - - - - G 98 200.00• I851'2r 60.08' 99 1.5.00' )1'18.16 81.60' 1- 104.67' 1973' N.21'19RMI•w. 1•IJI)IT M27M 4E. ^' , 181.12' 100 AM.00' 1412'.6' 51.60' Ol 680.00' 71'5)'55 116.09'2)1.52' M.55' 56.8)' 2)1.52' NSJ19.16E. M074--E.V� I I 101 1.106H'S5 7.10' 103 Im..00' 610226• 301' 119 Ss' 21656' 7 71' IJ5.9J' N 00'W. N.78J0'JB•W !0. 120.00' 231'10'13' BB8.9J' -/56.01' 39429' N. BX 05.15E - PR.L. LINE TABLE 0 AA L;A. BID.;A9 a:mA,W LI 50018'OYW. SJ.91' i6' Q Q L2 SOOJB'O7w. 111.55' I I I I LL I }1 co •IT 60' at I T L5 so 1,1.16' 'R', CT , D.E. & U.B. I I v I ;66'rW 5 N8716'0Lrw 109.)1' L6 N5116'OrW. 120.08' r ` "Moi'GW L&E.. IGU.& & D.6 Q L> SJ719•IrW. 80.95' L 8 309 161.71' r R e C r G C- 1 y - 6.11"W. L9 N71';'II'W. 11..1 10 /1'1/'01'.. )JO.Ie' S09'31'ITw LI} SBTSS'S6W. 11212' LiJ SBT55'SSw. 11215' LI! N.81555r•.. 11212' LIS .8133'36£ )25.11' L16 N. M12'ITW. 20.37' 2000 SBFII'1Y Aro1lE` 'VEIL w BE AOd1ANlt IQ588CII016 lIIO' Aw MT IQCC16m ON 1M5 MT TNI! w8'BE FOINo NDE 1 L3meD9 W !M3 O04MV.' IM6 PIAT, AS PELICIBRD N RS slI R IDIN, IS IK OER1LL CFAC14ri OF TIE SL®11'EED LAMA 0®8® M AM OVER IOM. AM MEL N Ip 0RCU6IAhQ3 E SLPRAvo N . AU010l11' ER fiNABC OR OR1IN T01Y a IK RAI, Ili[IIER OWg10 CR OEEM6 `�fy 1Ni5 1NSiRUMENi WAS PREPARCp 01S MICHAEL H. -L. P 1650 .SM . N0 . -mREGISIEREO \\\ ENCNEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3200 &TREY LANE Ai AIRPORT ROAD 19"1 NAPLES. COLLIER COUNTY. FlOR101 rRACr •cc -II O.E. 8 M.E. � \ 6P.R.C. M1 LOT 11 oN LOT I1- / LOT 10 ^7" Loi 12 4 = IS- D.E ' S.B41B'15E' 181.18' N.R. 1't '.V Hyl I.2r.,�'B. LOT 9 � !y ` FASEMEM LOT a�/ ) N87! LOT 7 .a L0T6 �YV LOT5 IS' P.1(.C.1 kB \/ LOT I RI ,y1'S;�S.B9'11'S8•E. I h 61' 20141' Xl' L. kM.E. 1 _I W LOT 3 sI F a C H L I N E eI 5.441,.E E 16" - --- ------ LOT 2 h _ 22797' S. g ) SB421.56E. N� •.56'E. - E T 6 __ 2.55' ^ I z5 J r A CT "GC -II z8 Loll `�- pE k ML 'I o• umm FASEYEM i ,A9) 9.D.7 PLAT BOOK 33 , PAGE (03 a SHEET 5 OF 6 i i o I I I I I I I I � I � a ., aruT y II rB/Cl" CU.E., D.E. INC m � I I O I I I I i I 1 � I I LCA Mia 1-r LR.E. I p CUM I& D.B. _ C I ti � III I 10' VO(OT L SEM(Nil � O I I I J I I a RAff 'GW {•B.B.. C. U.S. & D.E. O I I � ffr o�we� ffs nUCr -Jr, CAR., D.R. & U.F 0 TiACr i6' Q Q T I I I I LL I }1 co •IT 60' at I T 'R', CT , D.E. & U.B. I I v I I I r ` "Moi'GW L&E.. IGU.& & D.6 Q E rRacr Wsc-Is• I I v N8611'STW. � a Packet Pg. 1519 GREY OAKS UNIT FOURTEEN A REPLAT OF PART OF TRACT "H" OF "GREY OAKS UNIT THREE", PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 30-37, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A BEING A PART OF SECTIONS 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA fq LU.E � 1(AiEUW[� TRACT •I• --------- - - - - - - - -SH.e x w. .,r.• DY mm OP Alr nuer •D'. aum, D.R. 3 UJL g? (KNtr 110' F.P.L. EASEMENT - O.R. B --------- - -- BOOK IBS. PACE 815 NOT PLATTED ^W 2' TRACT •OC -!R• DF t M.E CO(,p BOOB PPBA27J) hVIKG 'nIFIR wr w AOOIIIJN4 alsrncrpx5 MAT AaE NOT BECOaOm ON 7-89 PIAT TpT wY BE fDVNO N 111E PU9X: RECORDS OF 7-95 COIBTY.' TMS PLAT, AS RELVROFD N TS ORAPI6C iDBY. 6 TE OiPICW. DEPICIpN OF TIE SUBdYAw WILLS OESCR9E0 M'1BSl ANO Ilftl N NO L81LYR5TAACFS E SUPPIANIFD N AMIAtl1Y BY ANY OTIER ORAPIIIC OR OAiTAL EplY Di TIE PIAT. WIIEINER CRAPNK OR OIf.IIAL -5 i TRUME WAS Pa EMAR�O ./ 1 ' InL60NM�L. A.U. P.S. 650 TE 3200 B/1t LYULS NEE T AKPOa aMOURVEY0R5 NNPLES. COLLIER -1• loo -- `10'UN TRACT •OC -IR• PLAT BOOK 33 , PAGE b SHEET 6 OF 6 UDPLA77ED LAND 9.D.7 CURVE TABLE NO. RAONK MIA ABC % CENE LMOaD LMMO BURNO 300.00' -12 � I I IM.61' )8.1)• 199.10• 390.50' 123.8.' 676' S.1525'IrW. NBJ10'S8'W. S 5.2.00' 6 m.w. LOTS 111.60' M..07- 193..1' 81.80' 361.31' 155.83' SEE SHEET 5 181.32' 151.60' -------J-1--------- 69.)3' 136.8)' --- -------- - - - - - - - - - - M A ---------- P.R.C. T C ---- H L I N E ---- I 381.50' 10.5.16' 515.25'21-W 4Y25'21'W. 11 500.00' S 5800' b•16.58- N2B1' 111.01' ?D' D.E. t M.E. LOT 2 N.69'S9'JYW. :69'S9'JYW. 1J 250.00' 1 500.00' u� 209.01• 385.31' 111.07' 208.6)' 203.00• 385 IS' LMiff 15 300.00' 6 210.00' I) 80.00' STSIroY 162'18.10' 101'16'12' v.a.C. 16613• 1761.9)' 1'.. 190.6)' 11509' -11' -19•J.9'E. SJI'S3'STW. .61.01'S1'W. I- TRACT •OC -ll• I LOT D.E t ME. TDI Cr •OC -Il• D'umm 2000 OE tr ME F.IS'EIEENT / s.er11' v.R.C. fff fq LU.E � 1(AiEUW[� TRACT •I• --------- - - - - - - - -SH.e x w. .,r.• DY mm OP Alr nuer •D'. aum, D.R. 3 UJL g? (KNtr 110' F.P.L. EASEMENT - O.R. B --------- - -- BOOK IBS. PACE 815 NOT PLATTED ^W 2' TRACT •OC -!R• DF t M.E CO(,p BOOB PPBA27J) hVIKG 'nIFIR wr w AOOIIIJN4 alsrncrpx5 MAT AaE NOT BECOaOm ON 7-89 PIAT TpT wY BE fDVNO N 111E PU9X: RECORDS OF 7-95 COIBTY.' TMS PLAT, AS RELVROFD N TS ORAPI6C iDBY. 6 TE OiPICW. DEPICIpN OF TIE SUBdYAw WILLS OESCR9E0 M'1BSl ANO Ilftl N NO L81LYR5TAACFS E SUPPIANIFD N AMIAtl1Y BY ANY OTIER ORAPIIIC OR OAiTAL EplY Di TIE PIAT. WIIEINER CRAPNK OR OIf.IIAL -5 i TRUME WAS Pa EMAR�O ./ 1 ' InL60NM�L. A.U. P.S. 650 TE 3200 B/1t LYULS NEE T AKPOa aMOURVEY0R5 NNPLES. COLLIER -1• loo -- `10'UN TRACT •OC -IR• PLAT BOOK 33 , PAGE b SHEET 6 OF 6 UDPLA77ED LAND 9.D.7 D \I Packet Pg. 1520 CURVE TABLE NO. RAONK MIA ABC % CENE LMOaD LMMO BURNO 300.00' -12 -r i'S)'IS' IM.61' )8.1)• 199.10• 390.50' 123.8.' 676' S.1525'IrW. NBJ10'S8'W. S 5.2.00' 6 m.w. J9'16'w -51'1S 111.60' M..07- 193..1' 81.80' 361.31' 155.83' N6P59'JTW. IJroI'[ 15.00' 8 1)0.00' )1'38'19' 9.12-46' 181.32' 151.60' 101.6)' )9.55' 69.)3' 136.8)' N.PT06.11'E. S I9'16'E. 9 258.00' 10 216.00' 89'SYOT BSSJ'OY 101.)5• JJ6B6' 25].18• 215.5)' 381.50' 10.5.16' 515.25'21-W 4Y25'21'W. 11 500.00' S 5800' b•16.58- N2B1' 111.01' 1)8.15' 10..16' 136.13' JO).90' N.69'S9'JYW. :69'S9'JYW. 1J 250.00' 1 500.00' ,9.16'58' T51.1T 1518'21' 209.01• 385.31' 111.07' 208.6)' 203.00• 385 IS' 24'19%IrE.. N2SJl'!0'E. 15 300.00' 6 210.00' I) 80.00' STSIroY 162'18.10' 101'16'12' 30.1.11' S951S 15.59• 16613• 1761.9)' 1'.. 190.6)' 11509' -11' -19•J.9'E. SJI'S3'STW. .61.01'S1'W. D \I Packet Pg. 1520 TPODIICOCR plannino-enoineering Traffic Impact Statement O'Donnell Nursery Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) Prepared for: Peninsula Engineering 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Bonita Springs, FL 34105 Phone: 239-403-6700 Collier County, Florida 03/12/2018 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee — $500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee — Small Scale Study — No Fee 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1521 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. %%% N `�QP'�,�G•E•SF CC0�: No 47116 '.-�r,� • X O'.•• S TATE O F �i �s • O R C? ONA11110��, This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Norman J. Trebilcock, PE using a SHA -1 authentication code. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed, and the SHA -1 authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 9.D.7 1 Packet Pg. 1522 9.D.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Table of Contents ProjectDescription......................................................................................................................... 4 Trip Generation —Traffic Conversion Analysis................................................................................ 6 Trip Distribution and Assignment................................................................................................... 7 BackgroundTraffic........................................................................................................................ 10 Existing and Future Roadway Network......................................................................................... 11 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis............................................................ 11 Site Access Turn Lane Analysis...................................................................................................... 12 ImprovementAnalysis.................................................................................................................. 13 Mitigationof Impact..................................................................................................................... 14 Appendices Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan.......................................................................................... 15 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist.......................................................................................... 17 Appendix C: Collier County Ordinance 2007-40 - Excerpt........................................................... 24 Appendix D: Collier County PUD Monitoring Report - Excerpt ................................................... 26 Appendix E: Grey Oaks DRI — Conceptual Roadway Master Plan ................................................ 28 Appendix F: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition......................................................... 30 Appendix G: Turning Movements Exhibit.................................................................................... 37 0 a Y a� /L^ V 00 v LO T11 O O O ti 0 N J a 0 c 0 ca .Q a a LL c m E ns r a E 2 a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 13 Packet Pg. 1523 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Project Description The O'Donnell Nursey project is a proposed wholesale nursery development located on the west side of Livingston Road approximately 1,400 feet north of the intersection of Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway and directly south of the intersection of Livingston Road and Grey Oaks Drive East, and is generally located within Section 24/25, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, in Collier County, Florida. Refer to Fig. 1— Project Location Map, which follows and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan Fig. 1— Project Location Map x � G'wl •l' f PROJECT LOCATIO[� 8 Nook ` .s 0 Mb Naotsi zoa m •.� M11�,10�8�d!'ti.r+ �r 1 ,� � j' ^•� n�.e, neem . iw,,.ramn new.,,... ; � .T� Fd ln�„, r YM.: �4�.e '• �[n �R � �� ..+.Wo.ib: M^4,k.� e f l � ar •i,y,� faJ ,Mrp r T � ® S 6, ynnw.• ` Q' Nau'oM ' vv_la'i.: ' 4 r � w ywuu �� - Goog Q g � HmiIW AeM run �IrY'u�plry Cfy6 •� .� The subject site consists of 2 parcels totaling approximately 31 acres in size, is currently zoned as Planned Unit Development (PUD) and is a part of the Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact (DRI). As allowed by the PUD commercial permitted uses, the project proposes 27 acres of wholesale nursery and commercial landscaping, 2.75 acres of retail nursery and 1.25 acres of farmer's market. The retail nursery is comprised of a 7,500sf outdoor sales and display area. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 14 Packet Pg. 1524 9.D.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on August 24, 2016, via email (refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting)). Consistent with the approved Collier County Ordinance #2007-40, the Grey Oaks DRI site is currently allowed to be developed with up to 1,775 residential dwelling units, 1,303,091sf of office/retail/commercial and 72 golf course holes. The approved development program associated with these land uses is shown in Table 1A, Existing Approved and Built Development Program. For details, see Appendix C: Collier County Ordinance 2007-40 — Excerpts and Appendix D: Collier County PUD Monitoring Report — Excerpts. Table 1A Existing Approved and Built Development Program ITE Land Use (Zoning Designation) ITE Land Use Code Approved Size Built to Date Size Single -Family Detached 210 1,775 du 1,159 du General Office Bldg. 710 653,453 sf 0 sf Shopping Center 820 649,638 sf 0 sf Golf Course 430 72 holes 72 holes The project plans to eliminate 2 commercial access locations (approved within the Grey Oaks DRI Master Plan); one from Golden Gate Parkway and one from Airport Road, and proposes 2 new driveway access locations from Livingston Road to serve the proposed O'Donnell Nursery project; one directional left-in/right-in/right-out access onto southbound Livingston Road (north access) and one right -out only access onto southbound Livingston Road (south access). For details, see Appendix E: Grey Oaks DRI — Conceptual Roadway Master Plan. For purposes of this evaluation, the project build -out year is assumed to be consistent with the Collier County 2023 planning horizon. The project provides a highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. The proposed development program is illustrated in Table 113. Table 1B Proposed Development Program Development ITE Land Use ITE Land Use Code 818 Total Size O'Donnell Nursery Nursery — Wholesale 27 acres O'Donnell Nursery Nursery — Retail 817 7,500sf* Farmers Market Farmers Market 858 1.25 acres *7,500sf outdoor sales and display area located on 2.75 acres. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P z 1 5 Packet Pg. 1525 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Trip Generation - Traffic Conversion Analysis The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The software program OTISS — Online Traffic Impact Study Software (most current version) is used to create the raw unadjusted trip generation for the project. The ITE rates or equations are used for the trip generation calculations as applicable. The climate and demographic makeup of Collier County and the surrounding area create a large year-round demand for commercial landscaping services. In order to account for this increased demand, a supplemental calculation was performed for anticipated additional traffic from the landscaping service. Based on client provided data, trip generation was calculated to include employees arriving on site in the morning in personal vehicles, then departing in company trucks (a total of 50) to their respective landscape maintenance projects. Similarly, the company trucks would return to the project site in the afternoon and the employees would leave the site in their personal vehicles. It is assumed there are 5 -man crews per truck and that some carpooling will occur between employees, for an average of 3 personal vehicle trips per truck. The trips are assumed to occur, conservatively, during the AM and PM peak hour time periods as applicable. In order to account for the reduced availability of the retail nursery when the farmers market is operating, a 50% reduction of the retail nursery traffic was included and is reflected in the trip generation. Based on ITE recommendations, no internal capture or pass -by reductions have been taken into consideration. The proposed PUDA development trip generation is illustrated in Table 2A. Detailed calculations can be found in Appendix F: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10t1i Edition. Table 2A Trip Generation (Proposed PUDA Development) - Average Weekday Development AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Nursery - Wholesale 27 acres 5 2 7 2 10 12 Nursery—Retail* 7,500sf 4 5 9 13 13 26 Farmers Market 1.25 acres 110 109 219 108 117 225 Commercial Landscaping** N/A 150 50 200 50 150 200 Total External 269 166 435 173 290 463 *7,500sf outdoor sales and display area located on 2.75 acres. Includes 50% reduction due to Farmers Market operation. **Manually calculated based on client supplied data. In agreement with the Collier County Traffic Impact Study (TIS) guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net new total) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 6 Packet Pg. 1526 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 information contained in Collier County 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for the adjacent roadway network is PM peak hour. A purpose of this analysis is to generate a traffic conversion equivalency between the proposed project and the undeveloped retail land use within the Grey Oaks DRI. The projects total external PM peak hour2-way trip generation is used to determine the traffic impact of the project and provides guidance as to the amount of retail square footage required for conversion. The ITE LUC 820, shopping center, was used to model the trip generation for the retail portion of the DRI. Based on the results of the trip generation, 80,500sf of undeveloped shopping center will be converted to the proposed PUDA development land uses, as illustrated in Table 2B. Table 2B Trip Generation Conversion — PM Peak Hour Development PM Peak Hour Size Enter Exit Total Proposed PUD Development Per Table 2A 173 290 463 Proposed Retail Conversion 80,500sf 222 241 463 Net Difference 1.25 acres (49) 49 0 For the purpose of this TIS, the surrounding roadway network link concurrency analysis is analyzed based on projected PM peak hour Total External traffic generated by the proposed PUDA project. The site access turn lane analysis is calculated based on the Total External trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hour (as shown in Table 2A). Trip Distribution and Assignment The new traffic generated by the O'Donnell Nursery project is assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area and as coordinated with Collier County Transportation Planning Staff. The site -generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour and is graphically depicted in Fig. 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and By PM Peak Hour. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 7 Packet Pg. 1527 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Table 3 Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour Note(s): *Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a P 1 8 Packet Pg. 1528 Collier Distribution of PM Peak Hour Project Vol.* Roadway Link County Roadway Link Location Project Traffic Link No. South of project to Golden Enter/(Exit) o 0 50//(100%) Enter Exit NB -87 SB — 290 Livingston 54.0 Road Gate Parkway Livingston 54.0 North of project to Pine 50%/(N/A) SB -86 N/A Road Ridge Road Livingston Golden Gate Parkway to 55.0 0 0 15//(30/) NB -26 SB — 87 Road Radio Road EB —116 Golden Gate 20.2 Livingston Road to 1-75 20%/(40%) WB -35 Parkway 7WB — 87 Golden Gate 20.1 Livingston Road to Airport 15%/(30%) EB — 26 Parkway Road Note(s): *Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a P 1 8 Packet Pg. 1528 9.D.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Fig. 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and By PM Peak Hour PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION I' MAP BY PROJECT LOCATION W PERCENTAGE ENTER 30°/0 EXIT {30°/0} raw '` Mmwpal Anpat. .rr x. ' � r r s 1 � w► r 1 N Y PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION PROJECT LOCATION MAP BY PM PEAK HOUR (PM -290) � •tl [Ph4.87i (pm -1 16)9 u,aes roa m . .... , r•.. •a ..•.., Pi�1-2S Pr�l-35 � cor^eeeanrvmn:• ...1 ..T.�.... w.rpr,.., -..X �.Ar. {Pr.�-871 c PM -26 p AA -13 i Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 9 Packet Pg. 1529 9.D.7 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Background Traffic Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate from annual traffic counts (estimated from 2008 through 2017), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2017 AUIR volume plus the trip bank volume. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the build -out year 2023. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2017 - 2023) Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate - from 2017 AUIR, 2% minimum. **Growth Factor = (1+Annual Growth Rate) 6. 2023 Projected Volume= 2017 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. ***2023 Projected Volume= 2017 AUIR Volume + Trip Bank. The projected 2023 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 10 Packet Pg. 1530 2023 Projected 2023 2017 AUIR Projected Pk Hr Peak Dir Projected Pk Pk Hr, Pk Hr, Peak Dir cc Traffic Background Dir Background Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Traffic Link Link Location Growth Factor w/out Project Bank ID # Traffic Rate (trips/hr) Volume Volume (�/yr)* Growth w/out Project (trips/hr) (trips/hr) Trip Factor** Bank*** Livingston 54.0 South of project to Golden Gate 1,470 2.091. 1.1262 1,656 34 1,504 Road Parkway North of project Livingston 54.0 to Pine Ridge 1,470 2.0% 1.1262 1,656 34 1,504 Road Road Golden Gate Livingston 55.0 Parkway to 1,270 o 2.0/ 1.1262 1,431 39 1,309 Road Radio Road Golden Livingston Road Gate 20.2 2,770 2.0% 1.1262 3,120 1 2,771 Parkway to 1-75 Golden Livingston Road Gate 20.1 to Airport Road 2,200 2.0% 1.1262 2,478 0 2,200 Parkway Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate - from 2017 AUIR, 2% minimum. **Growth Factor = (1+Annual Growth Rate) 6. 2023 Projected Volume= 2017 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. ***2023 Projected Volume= 2017 AUIR Volume + Trip Bank. The projected 2023 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 10 Packet Pg. 1530 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) and the project roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5 -Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County 2017 AUIR, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build -out. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Note(s): 2U = 2 -lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D =4 -lane, 6 -lane, 8 -lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future horizon (2023). The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 111 Packet Pg. 1531 Exist Peak Dir, Future CC AUIR Roadway Link Exist Min. Peak Hr Project Roadway Link Link ID # Location Roadway St rd Capacity Build out LOS Volume Roadway South of project Livingston 54.0 to Golden Gate 6D E 3,100 (NB) 6D Road Parkway North of project Livingston 54.0 to Pine Ridge 6D E 3,100 (NB) 6D Road Road Livingston Road 55.0 Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Road 6D E 3,000 (NB) 6D Golden Gate 20.2 Livingston Road 6D E 3,300 (EB) 6D Parkway to 1-75 Golden Gate Livingston Road 20 1 6D E 3,300 (EB) 6D Parkway to Airport Road Note(s): 2U = 2 -lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D =4 -lane, 6 -lane, 8 -lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future horizon (2023). The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 111 Packet Pg. 1531 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Based on these criteria, this project does create a significant impact on Livingston Road south of the project to Golden Gate Parkway and on Golden Gate Parkway from Livingston Road to 1-75. The impact on the remaining analyzed links is not significant. All links analyzed are projected to operate above the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2023 future build -out conditions. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the roadway network closest to the project. Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — With Project in the Year 2023 Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2023 Projected Volume = 2023 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added. Site Access Turn Lane Analysis Connection to subject project is proposed via one directional left-in/right-in/right-out access onto southbound Livingston Road (north access) and one right -out only access onto southbound Livingston Road (south access). For details, refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Livingston Road is a 6 -lane urban divided arterial roadway under Collier County jurisdiction, and has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. Based on FDOT Index 301, design speed of 45 mph — urban conditions — the minimum turn lane length is 185 feet (which includes a 50 foot taper) plus required queue. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Packet Pg. 1532 2017 Roadway 2023 a /Vol Min LOS Min LOS CC Link, Peak Peak Dir, AUIR Roadway Peak Dir, Dir Peak Peak Hr Capacity exceeded exceeded Roadway Link Link Link Location Peak Hr Hr (Project Volume Impact without with ID # Capacity Vol w/P*oject by Project? Project? Volume project Yes/No Yes/No Added)* South of Livingston Road 54.0 project to 3,100 NB — 87 1,743 a 2.81/o No No Golden Gate (NB) Parkway North of Livingston Road 54.0 project to 3,100 N/A 1,656 N/A No No Pine Ridge (NB) Road Golden Gate Livingston Road 55.0 Parkway to 3,000 NB -26 1,457 0.87% No No Radio Road (NB) Golden Gate 20.2 Livingston 3,300 EB —116 3,236 3.52% No No Parkway Road to 1-75 (EB) Livingston Golden Gate 20.1 Road to 3,300 EB -26 2,504 0.79% No No Parkway Airport Road (EB) Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2023 Projected Volume = 2023 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added. Site Access Turn Lane Analysis Connection to subject project is proposed via one directional left-in/right-in/right-out access onto southbound Livingston Road (north access) and one right -out only access onto southbound Livingston Road (south access). For details, refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Livingston Road is a 6 -lane urban divided arterial roadway under Collier County jurisdiction, and has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. Based on FDOT Index 301, design speed of 45 mph — urban conditions — the minimum turn lane length is 185 feet (which includes a 50 foot taper) plus required queue. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Packet Pg. 1532 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Project access is evaluated for turn lane warrants based on Collier County Right-of-way Manual: (a) two-lane roadways — 40vph for right -turn lane/20vph for left -turn lane; and (b) multi -lane divided roadways — right turn lanes shall always be provided; when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left turn lanes. Turn lane lengths required at build -out conditions are analyzed based on the number of turning vehicles in an average one -minute period for right -turning movements, and two -minute period for left -turning movements, within the peak hour traffic. The minimum queue length is 25 feet and the queue/vehicle is 25 feet. Projected turning traffic movements are illustrated in Appendix G: Turning Movements Exhibits Main Site Entrance — Livineston Road — North Access A dedicated southbound right -turn lane is warranted as the project meets the multi -lane criteria. The proposed project is expected to generate 135 and 87vph right -turning movements during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. At the minimum, the turn lane should be 260 feet long (which includes a minimum of 75 feet of storage). As such, a 260 foot right -turn lane is recommended to accommodate projected traffic at this location. A dedicated northbound left -turn lane is warranted as the project meets the multi -lane criteria. There is an existing northbound left -turn lane approximately 550 feet long. The proposed project is expected to generate 134 and 86vph left -turning movements during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. At the minimum, the turn lane should be 310 feet long (which includes a minimum of 125 feet of storage). As such, the existing 550 foot left -turn lane is adequate to accommodate projected traffic at this location. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting to determine turn lane requirements as more accurate parameters become available, as applicable. Improvement Analysis Based on the results of the conversion analysis included in this report, this project's traffic impact does not exceed the traffic generated by the approved PUD ordinance. As illustrated in the link analysis and trip distribution, the proposed project's impact is significant on Livingston Road south of the project to Golden Gate Parkway, and significant on Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and 1-75. Projected traffic does not create any significant impacts on the other analyzed roadway segments of the study network. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 13 Packet Pg. 1533 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 None of the analyzed links are projected to exceed the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at 2023 future build -out conditions. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Consistent with the site access turn lane analysis results, a 260 foot right -turn lane is recommended to accommodate traffic at build -out conditions. The existing northbound left -turn lane is adequate to accommodate projected traffic at this location. Mitigation of Impact From a zoning perspective, given that access is eliminated on Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road due to less intensive established land uses there and this proposal does not create a net increase in development external trips as compared to the original development parameters, the prior established DRI mitigation should be deemed satisfactory. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 14 Packet Pg. 1534 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.D.7 Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan (1 Sheet) Y v LO 0 0 0 ti T N J IL a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 15 Packet Pg. 1535 f , ri rr I ! 1 r! rl ' r -� --- - r- ------ '----------'I�� 9.D.7 0 D d m O O Iq Lf) T O O O ti r O N J a. O CD @ V Q a Q U - c m t V fC r Q C CD t V t6 Q Packet Pg. 1536 � I i 1 r- ------ '----------'I�� 9.D.7 0 D d m O O Iq Lf) T O O O ti r O N J a. O CD @ V Q a Q U - c m t V fC r Q C CD t V t6 Q Packet Pg. 1536 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.D.7 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) (6 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 17 Packet Pg. 1537 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a isorksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do nut apph, or \:/A (nut applicable). Date: August 24, 2016 Time: N/A Location: N/A — Via Email People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Chad Sweet, Collier County Growth Management Department 2) Norman Trebilcock. TCS 3) Daniel Doyle. TCS Study Prepare r: Preparer's Name and Title: Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PF, Organization: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Address & Telephone Number: 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202, Naples, Fl 34110: ph 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s) Reviewer's Name & Title: Chad Sweet, PE Collier County Transportation Planning Department Organization & Telephone Number: 239-252-2491 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Peninsula F,ngincering Address: 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Fl, 34105 Telephone Number: 239-403-6700 Proposed Development: Name: O'Donnell Nursery — SIP Location: West of Livingston Road, east of Grey Oaks and approximately 970 feet north of Golden Gate Parkway (Refer to Fig.1). Land Use Type: Nursery (Wholesale) ITE Code 4: Land Use Code (LUC) 818 Description: The nroicct proposes a 31 acre wholesale nunerv. 'llre site is currently vacant. The property will allow for cultivation of landscaping vegetation as well as provide storage for landscaping materials, trucks and cuuipment. Page 1 of'6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g ^ 1 18 Packet Pg. 1538 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 g.1— Project Location Map PROJECT LOCATION � r ilk Project will need a PUD Zoning amendment to allow for any Existing Grey Oaks DRI-MPUD — Collier County Ordinance 07-40 access points off of Comprehensive plan recommendation: N/A Livingston. Not any accesses Requested: SIP approval for new development shown on the Master Site Plan. Findings of the Preliminary Study: Studv type: The proposed proiect traffic is less than 50 trips —this studv qualifies for a Small Scale TIS — no significant operational or roadwav impacts. The TIS will include AM and PM peak hour trip generation, PM Pk Hr traffic distribution and assignments, significance test, roadway link analysis. Operational Site Access Tum Lane Analysis — based on build -out External AM -PM Pk Hr trio Lyeneration. Traffic exiting the Droiect for northbound destinations will divert to I- 75, Airport -Pulling Road or US -41 as applicable Studv Type: (if not net increase, operational study) Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Maior TIS ❑ Study Area: Boundaries: East —Livingston Rd. Page 2 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 19 Packet Pg. 1539 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Additional intersections to be analyzed: NIA Build Out Year: 2018 Planning Horizon Year: 2018 Analysis Time Period(s): AM/PM Future Off -Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE 9t�' Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: NIA Pass -by trips: N/A Internal trips (PUD): N/A Transit use: NIA Other: NIA Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2018 Methodoloey & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: Collier County traffic counts and/or 2015 AUIR Site -trip generation: LUC 818 — rTE 9"' Edition Trip distribution method: engineer's estimate — refer to Fig. 2, below Traffic assignment method: project trip generation with background growth Traffic growth rate: historical growth rate or 2% minimum Project Accesses: Livingston Rd — northbound left in. Livingston Rd — southbound right in -right out. — see Fig. 3 — Proiect Turning Movements by Percentage on next page. Fig. 2 — Project Trip Distribution by Percentage PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION' MAP BY PROJECT LOCATION PERCENTAGE �+ sow nnrr.� s�l __ _ I 30% •_ y `, 1- rare t �• h �� C 11� ''�• L� n 6A r�; .•t 1. _ ,. I �.,� _ z_.y 1 I�l� `r �•. L�. Pu 14 v r4 ' Page 3 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 20 Packet Pg. 1540 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Fig. 3 — ProJecl 'Turning Movements by Percentage PROJECT TURNING MOVEMENTS BY PERCENTAGE N i , PROJECT l �I ;I I, , I� LSI L, **TIS will need to discuss right turn lanes at both entrances at this Arterial has a raised median. there will also be some distribution to the southerly driveway. Per Pre -App, this was to be considered as an exit. If project improved, a right turn lane is needed here. There is also no turning movements here. Applicant wanted to see if this coup be right out only. This may be an FPL access road in which as show would need a rig[ turn lane. Page 4 o d Y O O 00 v 0 0 0 ti 0 N J 0 c�a U .Q Q U- E t M a a� E t U ns r Q Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA ° ^ ^ 1 21 Packet Pg. 1541 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Special Features: from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: NIA Sight distance: NIA Queuing: NIA Access location & configuration: NIA Traffic control: MUTL D Signal system location & progression needs: NIA On-site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: CC 2015 AUIR: CC Traffic Counts Base maps: NIA Prior study reports: NIA Access policy and jurisdiction: NIA Review process: NIA Requirements: NIA Miscellaneous: N/A Small Scale Study – No Fee 7: Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 Methodology Fee $500 x Includes 0 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each Ali fees bili he agreed to during the 3ferhodologp meeting and iruesi he paid to Trampartation prier to our sign -off m the appheutirn:. SIGNAT URES NormIiyt- TYebUoock Study Preparer—Norinan'Frebilcock Reviower(s) Applicant Collier County Page 5 of G Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g ^ 1 22 Packet Pg. 1542 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodolop-v Review - $500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approvallcomments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a rc-submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County, if needed. "Small Scale Study" Review - No Additional Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation, distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Study Review" - $750 Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collcetcd/asscmbled, review of off-site improvements within the right-of-way, review of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/qucstions. "Nfalor Stuck Reyie-,r," - $1,500 Fee (includes two intersection analysis and two sufticieney reviews Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of traffic growth analysis, review of off-site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation, neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of "sufficiency" commcnts/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review" - $500 Fee '17mc review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the "Major Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews" - $500 Fee Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 6 of'6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g ^ 1 23 Packet Pg. 1543 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.D.7 Appendix C: Collier County Ordinance 2007-40 - Excerpt (1 Sheet) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 24 Packet Pg. 1544 O'Donnell Nursery - PUDA TIS - March 2018 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g ^ 1 25 Packet Pg. 1545 THE GREY OAKS PUD TABLE LAND USE SUMMARY Northeast and Southeast Quadrants Collier County) AMOUNT ACREAGE Residential units 1,371 D_U. ,6 Ac. 55.34 +1- Ac. Conservation Commercial {Total} 9,2x3,091 S.F. H70.4 1- Ac. 353.89 Ac. Office {gross floor area} 583,453 S.F. Retail {gross leasable area} 609,638 S.F. Hotel Q Rooms 0 Ac. Golf CourselRecreationl Park/Right ht of Way 54 Hales 614.31 Ac. Lake/ Water Management 225.41 Ac. Conservation 5.32 Ac. Sub -Total 7,47.45 Ac. Note: Native Vegetation Preserve in Northeast and Southeast Quadrants totals 79.3,6 acres. (flee attached drawings E-1 through E-4 for locations)_ Northwest Quadrant C of Naples) AMOUNT � ACREAGE Residential units � 464 d.0 100.71 +1- Ac. Commercial {Total) 100,000 S.F. 14,4 +l- Ac. Office {gross floor area} 60,1700 S.F. Retail {grass leasable area} 4p,U0p S.F. Golf CourselRecreation! Park/Right-of- Way 1 g voles 147.4 +l_ Ac. Lake/ -f Water Management 7,6.04 +1- Ac. Note: Native Vegetation Preserve in Northwest Quadrant totals 58.63 acres. (See attached Drawings E-1 through E-4 for locations). Note: All acreages are digitized approximate acreages and are subject to change and variation. Note: The Northeast Quadrant shall have a total commerciailoffice square footage of 1,203,091 S.F. (Revised 4111107) 15 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g ^ 1 25 Packet Pg. 1545 55.34 +1- Ac. Conservation - - Sub -Total 353.89 Ac. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g ^ 1 25 Packet Pg. 1545 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.D.7 Appendix D: Collier County PUD Monitoring Report - Excerpt (1 Sheet) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 26 Packet Pg. 1546 UIN Iloll] 11IIMIVA:.IIIF KAM AAA STATUS 0,14 Pr(WA[ R -L4 DkAwd AX (IM LOWN STAR ... AMS MA TOTAL ACRES TOOTAL SOM DE V. COOK TOTAL W. TOTAL OZ. INUMV. RES.SF RESAF ACRES BEMOFT ACRES SOFT ACRES $QfT TOTAL 9 V OTHER OTHFR Qu W If RMPW HKRW HOSP HOSP RM DENS] ( MRSE CML TOTAL DEW. TOTAL DIW� TOTAL UIWL UNTS r AMS Notts AM �®■�■■rte®�■®®��■■■■■■■■■®■■■■■®®■■■ 9.D.7 0 0 0 c a c D D a. I � C 1/! a M 0 I d i a C7 00 ti ►17 o � Q 0 0 r` 0 N J a. Packet Pg. 1547 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.D.7 Appendix E: Grey Oaks DRI - Conceptual Roadway Master Plan (1 Sheet) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 28 Packet Pg. 1548 REVISED EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT ACCESS LOCATIONS ACCESSES TO BE ELIMINATED DRNEWAY p RESIDENnAL ROADWAY ExLSTING BEAR'S PAW ENTRANCE EXCMNC POINCIANA DINEWAY /7 VILLAGE ENTRANCE 4—R ESIOENTIAL ROADWAY FXEnNc POINCIANA VILLAGE ENTRANCE COSTING --)u COACH HOUSE LANE �� p Q O �� COSTING NG EI�� Q SQIOOL ENTRANCE 70 a DRNEWAY 0•B8 OFFICE/COMMERCIAL ORWEWAY /2 OFFICE/COMMERCP.L METING POINCNNA OFFICE ENTRANCE B GREY OAKS DR DRIVEWAY OBA COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE VCIRANCES pRIVEwAY EIiMiRAiEO Y /3A DRIVEWAY +4 DRIVEWAY 038 DRNEWAY �6 RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY N o soo' i000' PROJECT DRI4EWAYM9 ACCESS NORTH 4 Q z P z J J PROJECT DRNI:IA'AY IBA ACCESS SOUTH GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY DRNEWAY �$ LEG END �Q► SiCNAL DRIVEWAY0'72 • RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY LANE ARRANGEMENTS 99587/098/0500 CONCEPTUAL ROADWAY FOR SITE ACCESS Re"jsyd7�24MV MASTER PLAN WITH INTERCHANGE 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 1549 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.D.7 Appendix F: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition (6 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 30 Packet Pg. 1550 a' FT 0 M 0 0 c op 0 0 c 0 D Project Name: O Donnell Nursery- Proposed No: Date: 2122/2018 City: StatefProvince: ZipfPostal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: ITE-TGM 10th Edition WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE SIZE Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 818 - Nursery (Wholesale) (General Urban/Suburban) 27 264 263 ❑� 2❑ E2 10 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 264 263 5 2 N13 10 817 - Nursery (Garden Center) (General UrbanfSuburban) 7.5 «' 256 255 9 9 26 Reduction 128 127 5 4 13 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 128 128® El 13 13 858 - Farmers NFarket (General UrbanfSuburban) 1.25 ' 110 109 110 109 108 117 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 110 109 110 109 108 117 Total 5 3D Total Reduction 638 i 627 124 1240 113 113 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Non -pass -by 502 500 119 116 123 140 (1) Acres (2) 1000 Sq_ R GFA X 0 D D_ R O 00 Iq Lr) O O O ti r O N J D_ O t0 C O V Q iZ Q U_ C d E U fC Q a+ C CD E s U Q Packet Pg. 1551 PERIOD SETTING ,, DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click - Add Notes above. EXIT REDUCTION ADJUSTED EXIT 818 - Nursery (Wholesale) 07% 264 0 263 PROJECT NAME. 0 DONNELL NURSERY -PROPOSED 128 50 % 128 858 - Farmers Market 0=% 110 4 "% ANALYSIS IIAAME IVVeekday LAND USE INDEPENDENT VARIABLE SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL 818- Nursery "olesale) Acres❑U 27(01 General Average BID 26401 2630) 527(') Weekday Urban/Suburban 19.5 817- Nursery (Garden Center) 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 7.5 Urb Weekday El Average I 256 255 511 n/Subulrban 68.1 858- Farmers Market Acres ❑v 0 1.25(' Generalak Weekday, AM Pev Average Q 11001 1090( 2190( Urban/Suburban 1749 (0) indicates size out of range. Q The time periods do not match. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Specify a percentage by which the Entry Trip and Exit Trip will be reduced for each Land Use. This reduction is applied to the Entry Trip and Exit Trip from the previous section. To record any notes, click • Add Notes above. LAND USE ENTRY REDUCTION ADJUSTED ENTRY EXIT REDUCTION ADJUSTED EXIT 818 - Nursery (Wholesale) 07% 264 0 263 817 - Nursery (Garden Center) F50-1% 128 50 % 128 858 - Farmers Market 0=% 110 4 "% 109 CU aq rD W N 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1552 -E PERIOD SETTING DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click Add Notes above. PROJECTNAME'. 0- DONN ELL NURSERY -PROPOSED ANALYSIS NAME' qM Peak Hour LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE 818 -Nursery (Wholesale) Acres E 27 General Urban/Suburban Weekday, Peak Hoi� Average 5 ❑ * �} 2 7 ❑ 0 817 - Nursery (Garden Center) 50 A *** ® 0.26 El 858 - Farmers Market C�/- 110 817 -Nursery (Garden Center) 1000 Sq. Ft. GFAE]j 7.5 General Weekday, Peak Hoiw Urban/Suburban Average ** 18(0) 2.43 858 -Farmers Market Acres Ell 1.250) General Weekday, AM Peak Lerage V❑ 110(1) 109R' 219(')Urban/Suburban 174 9 (0) indicates directional distribution was not provided in the source document. Q The time periods do not match. This study cannot be used for trip distribution. (1) indicates size out or range. "Directional distribution was not available for this land use. A 75%/25% directional distribution was assumed for the AM Peak Hour (2) indicates small sample size, use carefully. "Directional distribution was not available for this land use. A 50%/50% directional distribution was assumed for the AM Peak Hour, TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Specify a percentage by which the Entry Trip and Exit Trip will be reduced for each Land Use. This reduction is applied to the Entry Trip and Exit Trip from the previous section. To record any notes, click - Add Notes above. LAND USE ENTRY REDUCTION ADJUSTED ENTRY EXIT REDUCTION ADJUSTED EXIT 818 - Nursery (Wholesale) D/ 5 E'% 0 817 - Nursery (Garden Center) 50 A *** ® 50 % *** El 858 - Farmers Market C�/- 110 (7771% 109 ***A 50% reduction is assumed for the Nursery (Garden Center) when the Farmers Market is operational. 9.D.7 E Packet Pg. 1553 9.D.7 PERIOD SETTING ., DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click • Add Notes above. PROJECTNAME. O DONNELL NURSERY - PROPOSED ANALYSIS NAME. PM Peak Hour LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE VARIABLE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL 818 -Nursery (Wholesaler) y❑ 27 e) A General Weekday, Peak Hor� Average 858 - Farmers Market 0 108 E * 12(0) ***A 50% reduction is assumed for the Nursery (Garden Center) when the Farmers Market is operational. Urban/Suburban 0.45 817 - Nursery (Garden Center) 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 0 7.5 General Weekday, Peak Hoi� Average EIJ 26 26 ** Sz ° Urban/Suburban 694 858 -Farmers Market Acres 0 1 25(x) General IWeekday, PM Peak Average ❑Y 108 1 117 225L7 Urban/Suburban 179.84 (0) indicates directional distribution was not provided in the source document. Q The time periods do not match. This study cannot be used for trip distribution. (1) indicates size out of range. Directional distribution was not available for this land use. A 250/of75% directional distribution was assumed for the PM Peak Hour. (2) indicates small sample size, use carefully —Directional distribution was not available for this land use. A 50%/50% directional distribution was assumed for the PM Peak Hour. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Specify a percentage by which the Entry Trip and Exit Trip will be reduced for each Land Use. This reduction is applied to the Entry Trip and Exit Trip from the previous section. To record any notes, click Add Notes above. LAND USE ENTRY REDUCTION ADJUSTED ENTRY EXIT REDUCTION ADJUSTED EXIT 818 - Nursery (Wholesale) % El C % ED 817 - Nursery (Garden Center) 50 %*** 13 (:51D7'% *** "13 858 - Farmers Market 0 108 C % 117 ***A 50% reduction is assumed for the Nursery (Garden Center) when the Farmers Market is operational. E Packet Pg. 1554 rD W Ul Project Name: Grey Oaks- Retail Conversion No: ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click • Date: 2122/2018 City: PROJECT NAME: GREY OAKS- RETAIL CONVERSION State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD Country: Client Name: 824- Shopping Center 1040 Sq. Ft. GLA ❑� 84.5 Analyst's Name: v Best Fit (LOG) ❑ 2594 2594 5188 Edition: ITE-TGM 10th Edition Ln(T) = O.68Ln(X) + 5.57 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LAND USE SIZE Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 820 -Shopping Center (General Urban/Suburban) 80.5 ' 2594 2594 119 73 222 241 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 2594 2594 119 73 222 241 Total 2594 2594 119 73 222 241 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Nan -pass -by 2594 2594 119 73 222 241 (1) 100051q P GLA 9.D.7 El Packet Pg. 1555 PERIOD SETTING ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click • Add Notes above. PROJECT NAME: GREY OAKS- RETAIL CONVERSION ANALYSIS NAME: Weekday LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE 824- Shopping Center 1040 Sq. Ft. GLA ❑� 84.5 General Weekday v Best Fit (LOG) ❑ 2594 2594 5188 Urban/Suburban Ln(T) = O.68Ln(X) + 5.57 9.D.7 El Packet Pg. 1555 CU aq rD W 9.D.7 PERIOD SETTING ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click - Add Notes above. PROJECT NAME_ GREY OAKS- RETAIL CONVERSION ANALYSIS NAME. AM Peak Hour I LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE I,'I General Best Fit (LIN) J 820- Shopping Center 100.0 Sq. Ft. GLA J 80.5 Urban/Suburban Weekday, Peak HorO 119 73 192 T=0.5(X)+151.78 PERIOD SETTING v DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click • Add Notes above. PROJECT NAME GREY OAKS- RETAIL CONVERSION ANALYSIS NAME: PM Peak Hour LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE 820 - Shopping Center1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 80.5 General Weekday, Peak HOLE,: Best Fit (LOG) 222 241 463 Urban/Suburban Ln(T) = 0.74Ln(X) + 2.89 S Packet Pg. 1556 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.D.7 Appendix G: Turning Movements Exhibit (2 Sheets) Y LO 0 0 0 ti T N J IL a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 37 Packet Pg. 1557 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.D.7 PROJECT TURNING MOVEMENTS BY PERCENTAGE 50% � �� 1 �• 3e '8 @� i;s c PROJECT I I I � \ � I SOUTH ACCESS IS RIGHT -OUT ONLY 0 a Y N V Iq ui T11 O O O ti T N J a 0 c O w .Q Q LL d E m a E 2 a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 38 Packet Pg. 1558 O'Donnell Nursery — PUDA TIS — March 2018 9.D.7 PROJECT TURNING MOVEMENTS BY AM/PM PEAK HOUR Arm 1 AM -1 35, PM -87 ILJ Tum PM-86'AM-13,47 kY 7F 1111 F li PROJECT I r 0 a Y 0 0 r O O O ti T 0 N J a 0 c 0 a .Q a LL E a a� E z U 2 r Q Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1 39 Packet Pg. 1559 9.D.7 D a U) R 0 d i O LC> r O O O ti r O N J a Packet Pg. 1561 9.D.7 Rick Scott DEC Cissy Proctor GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT-' ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY October 4, 2017 Mr. D. Wayne Arnold Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 RE: Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact; File No. ADA -09-1989-045 Dear Mr. Arnold: The Department has evaluated your request, dated July 18, 2017, for confirmation that the shifting of two previously approved project access points from Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, to Livingston Road, for the Grey Oaks Development of Regional Impact Development Order meets the requirements of Section 380.06(19)(e)2., Florida Statutes (F.S.). Your letter indicates that the two project access points shown on Map H have not been installed, but, were intended to serve as access points to the Grey Oaks community. Further, the two access points proposed to be shifted to Livingston Road are not intended for general access to the Grey Oaks community, but rather are intended for the sole use by the owner of approximately 32 acres adjacent to Livingston Road, and that this portion of the site is encumbered by a Florida Power & Light (FPL) easement. Your letter states that the PUD previously approved by Collier County, permits the FPL easement to be used as a landscape nursery; the owner of the fee simple lands within the FPL easement currently has a temporary agreement with the Grey Oaks homeowner association regarding the gated entrance on Livingston Road for use of the landscape nursery vehicles; and the two access points onto the lands encumbered by the FPL easement will be utilized for the landscape nursery operations. Lastly, the two access points on Livingston Road will not provide general access to the Grey Oaks community, and will be restricted to use by only the property owner of the fee simple lands encumbered by the FPL easement. The Department finds, in consultation with the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council and Florida Department of Transportation, that the proposed amendment is similar in nature, impact, or character to the changes enumerated in Section 380.06(19)(e)2.a-I., F.S., the proposed amendment does not create the likelihood of any additional regional impact, the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity I Caldwell Building 1107 E. Madison Street I Tallahassee, FL 32399 850.245.7105 1 www.floridajobs.org www.twitter.com/FLDEO lwww.facebook.com/FLDEO An equal opportunity employer/program. Auxiliary aids and service are available upon request to individuals with disabilities. All voice telephone numbers on this document may be reached by persons using TTY/TTD equipment via the Florida Relay Service at 711. Packet Pg. 1562 Mr. D. Wayne Arnold October 4, 2017 Page 2 of 2 proposed amendment does not require the filing of a notice of proposed change, and that the proposed amendment will only require an application to Collier County to amend the development order in accordance with the County's procedures for amendment of a development order. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact Brenda Winningham, Regional Planning Administrator, at (850) 717-8516, or by email at brenda.winningham@deo.mvflorida.com. Sincerely, Ja es D. Stansbury, Chief reau of Community Planning and Growth 1DS/bw 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1563 �ay�7 S 9107j77 ORDINANCE NO. 07_ 40 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM PUD TO MPUD FOR THE GREY OAKS MPUD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST, NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST QUADRANTS OF THE INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT ROAD (STATE ROAD 31) AND GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (COUNTY ROAD 886), IN SECTIONS 24, 25, AND 26 TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 1,601± ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 00-46, THE FORMER GREY OAKS PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Bruce Tyson, AICP, RLA, of WilsonMiller, Inc., representing Naples Grande Holdings LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the real property described in the MPUD Document located in Sections, 24, 25 and 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) in accordance with the MPUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A," which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. Grey Oaks, PUDA-2006-AR-10157 Page 1 of 2 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1564 SECTION TWO: Ordinance Number 00-46, known as the Grey Oaks PUD, adopted on June 27, 2000, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by supermajority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ,a day of r 1 , 2007. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK nr �1Deputy Clerk J test es ta:ihaIroan • sigaatur4.n�1- Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:' Marjori M. Student- tirling Assistant County Attorney P U DA-2006-AR-10157/KD/sp Grey Oaks, PUDA-2006-AR-10157 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This ordinance filed with +8 of Stuft's Office thl and alupwledgerf+9 thof of i D _ 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1565 9.D.7 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT FOR GREY OAKS PREPARED BY: WILSONMILLER, INC. 3200 BAILEY LANE, SUITE 200 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105 " Exhibit A" (Revised 4/99/07) DATE FILED DATE APPROVED BY BCC - -2007 ORDINANCE NUMBER 90-48 AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 97-45 AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 98-94 AMENDED BY ORDINANCE AMENDED BY ORDINANCE Packet Pg. 1566 INDEX PAGE List of Maps, Exhibits, and Tables iii Statement of Compliance and Short Title iv SECTION I Property Ownership and Legal Description 6 SECTION II Project Development 8 SECTION III Residential 18 SECTION IV Golf Course/Recreation/Park/Right-of-Way 23 SECTION V Conservation/Open Space 26 SECTION VI Commercial 28 SECTION VII General Development Commitments 33 (Revised 4/11/07) 2 9.D.7 0 D a Y f3 0 a� ,L^ V w v LO 0 0 0 0 N J d 0 le c 0 Cu Q CL Q LL r- 0 E t w r Q c (D E t r Q Packet Pg. 1567 LIST OF MAPS AND TABLES ITATTVI , H - 1 PUD Master Plan E — 1 Native Vegetation within Grey Oaks E — 2 Native Vegetation — North Area of Northeast Quadrant E — 3 Native Vegetation — Northwest Quadrant E-4 Native Vegetation — Southeast Quadrant and Southern Area of Northeast Quadrant TABLES TABLE I Land Use Summary TABLE it Project Absorption Schedule Estimate TABLE III Development Standards (Revised 4/11/07) 3 9.D.7 0 CL Y O a� C; v LO 0 0 0 0 N J d O le C 0 Cu Q CL Q LL c m E t U w r Q c (D E t V r Q Packet Pg. 1568 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE It is the intent of the Halstatt Partnership, A Florida General Partnership to create a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to be known as Grey Oaks Planned Unit Development, on 1,601.39 acres of land located in Section 24, and 25, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, and Section 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, City of Naples, Florida. The residential, recreational and commercial facilities of THE GREY OAKS DRI/PUD are consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives of the City of Naples and Collier County for the following reasons: 1) The subject property is located within the City and County Urban service areas and there are adequate available community facilities and services to support the proposed residential density and commercial intensity. 2) The City of Naples made a determination that the part of Grey Oaks in the City is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and land development regulations adopted by the City. 3) With regard to that part of Grey Oaks within the County: a) The project development is compatible and complementary to the surrounding land uses and future uses allowed by the Future Land Use Element. b) Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. c) The project development will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required by Policies 3.1.H and 3.1.J. of the Future Land Use Element. d) The project development is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities as required by Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element. e) The projected density of less than two (2) dwelling units per acre is less than that allowed under the Future Land Use Element since the project includes three (3) quadrants of an Activity Center and a density band. This project (Revised 4/11/07) 4 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1569 consists of 1,601.39 acres of land, with 1,775 dwelling units, which equals a density of 1.11 dwelling units per acre. f) The subject project occupies the northwest, southeast and northeast quadrants of the Activity Center located at the intersection of Airport and Golden Gate Parkway. This strategic location allows the site superior access for the placement of commercial activities. g) The project includes extensive open spaces in the form of golf courses and incorporates natural features to provide a high quality of life for its residents. SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "GREY OAKS Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Ordinance". (Revised 4/11/07) 5 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1570 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP & LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1.01 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The Northeast quadrant is currently owned by: a) Grey Oaks Country Club, Inc. 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL , 34105. b) LDG South LLC, 5692 Strand Court, Naples, FL, 34110. C) Individual Landowners. The Southeast quadrant is currently owned by: a) Panthers Grey Oaks, Inc., c/o Naples Grande Golf Club, 475 Seagate Drive, Naples, FL, 34103. b) Naples Grande Holdings LLC, 404 Citation Pt., Naples, FL, 34104. C) Sea Investments LLC, 10350 Bren Road W., Minnetonka, MN, 55343. The Northwest quadrant is currently owned by: a) Halstatt Partnership, 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL, 34105. b) Estuary at Grey Oaks LTD, 4200 Gulf Shore Blvd. N., Naples, FL, 34103. C) Grey Oaks County Club, Inc., 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL, 34105. d) Individual Landowners. 1.02 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of Section 24, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, lying easterly of that 100 foot canal right-of-way as described in O.R. Book 154, page 6, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; ALSO All that part of Section 25, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, lying easterly of that 100 foot canal right-of-way as described in O.R. Book 154, page 6, O.R. Book 873, page 1879 and O.R. Book 873, page 1882, all of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; LESS Golden Gate Parkway (C-886) as described in O.R. Book 465, page 275, and O. R. Book 465, page 278, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; ALSO LESS those lands described in O.R. Book 194, page 603 and O.R. Book 640, page 229, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, (Revised 4/11/07) 6 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1571 ALSO All that part of Section 26, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, lying westerly of Airport -Pulling Road (C-31) and northerly of Golden Gate Parkway (C- 886) located within the City of Naples; LESS that portion thereof as described in O.R. Book 539, page 370, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; above property subject to easements and restrictions of record; containing 1,601.39 net acres more or less. (Revised 4/11/07) 7 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1572 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the plan of the development and delineate the general conditions that will apply to the project. 2.02 INTRODUCTION Grey Oaks is a 1,601.39 acre mixed use residential development and golf course community with a "town center", and other retail and office development located in Collier County. The property is generally located in the northwest, northeast, and southeast quadrants of the intersection of Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway. The property is bounded on the east by Livingston Road; on the south by the Golden Gate Canal; on the west by the Gordon River Watershed; and on the north by the Coach House Land Residential Properties in the west quadrant, and the World Tennis Center in the northeast quadrant. The northwest quadrant of the property is in the incorporated City of Naples and constitutes approximately 354 of the 1,601.39 acres. The remainder of the property is located in the unincorporated area of Collier County. The project is of a size to be a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and an Application for Development Approval (ADA) has been filed pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes (1988). Because the City and County recognize that the project has been planned and will be developed as a unified integrated community, the City and County have agreed that a single local government (Collier County) should have the responsibility for reviewing the planned development and issuing a Development Order pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes and for adopting the zoning (MPUD Ordinance) for the entire project, including that portion that lies with the City of Naples. In furtherance of the goal of having one entity review the proposed project and adopt a zoning ordinance (MPUD) and Development Order for the project, the developer and the City of Naples have entered into a DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT and the City of Naples and Collier County have entered into an "INTERLOCAL GOVERNMENT AGREEMENT" with regard to the project. The DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT sets forth the maximum intensities of land uses for the property within the City and provides that the City agrees to accept and adopt (if appropriate) any Development Order and MPUD zoning issued by the County that does not exceed the intensities of land uses set forth in said DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT allows the County to review the proposed project as a single integrated planned community and approve a single set of development standards for the entire project by adopting a single PUD Ordinance and Development Order for the project. (Revised 4/11107) 8 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1573 The INTERLOCAL GOVERNMENT AGREEMENT between the City of Naples and the County of Collier incorporates said DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT and further provides that the City and County agree that the County shall conduct the rezoning and DRI review for the entire 1,601.39 acre project, including that portion of the project within the jurisdiction of the City of Naples. A copy of the INTERLOCAL GOVERNMENT AGREEMENT and the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT are made a part of this MPUD by reference thereto. The County, City and the Developer have all agreed that the 354 acres within the jurisdiction of the City is an integral part of the overall Grey Oaks DRI Community and it is therefore, essential to the viability of the planned community that the MPUD and DRI plan approved by Collier County be in effect and remain in effect for the entirety of the project and not just the portion of the project lying within the jurisdiction of the County of Collier. 2.03 LAND USES Table I is a schedule of the intended land uses types, with total dwelling units, acreage, and total square feet commercial indicated. The arrangement of these land use types is shown on Map H-1, Planned Unit Development Master Plan. Changes and variations in design and acreages shall be permitted during each subdivision phase at final design to accommodate topography, vegetation, and other site conditions. The final size of the recreation and open space lands will depend on the actual requirements for conservation areas, water management, golf course layout, roadway pattern, and dwelling unit size and configuration. At the time of Subdivision review and approval for each subdivision phase, the location, size and configuration of land use tracts shall be identified, along with the assignment of permitted residential or commercial land use types. The assignment of maximum allowed residential density and/or commercial gross leasable floor area shall also occur at the time of subdivision review and approval. If the maximum allowed residential density or commercial gross leasable area is not fully used within that subdivision phase of the project the unused remainder may be assigned to another phase(s) of the project. Final determination of the total multi -family residential or commercial use shall be determined at time of site development plan approval. For each succeeding subdivision and/or site development plan, a table shall be included which summarizes the total dwelling units and commercial floor area that has been previously assigned and total assigned for the pending approval, in order to facilitate the County's monitoring of the project. (Revised 4/11/07) 9 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1574 2.04 PROJECT DENSITY The total acreage of Grey Oaks Mixed Use Planned Unit Development is approximately 1,601.39 acres. The maximum number of dwelling units to be built on the total acreage is 1,775. The number of dwelling units per gross acre is approximately 1.11. The density on individual parcels of land throughout the project will vary according to the type of housing placed on each parcel of land but shall comply with guidelines established in this document. 2.05 PERMITTED VARIATIONS OF DWELLING UNITS All properties designated for residential uses may be developed at the maximum number of dwelling units allocated, provided that the total number of dwelling units shall not exceed 1,775. Table I identifies the maximum units by project quadrant. 2.06 DEVELOPMENT SEQUENCE AND SCHEDULE The developer will commence the project within the northeast quadrant. Within each quadrant, the amount and location of each subsequent development area will be dictated by logical and economical development constraints and by market demand. Table 11 indicates, by project year, the estimated absorption of units, and commercial square footage. The absorption schedule is an estimate and not guaranteed. Actual absorption rates are governed by market demand. 2.07 EASEMENTS FOR UTILITIES All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time of development. 2.08 COLLIER COUNTY AND CITY OF NAPLES SUBDIVISION APPROVAL The review and approval of subdivision master plans and construction plans shall follow the design and development standards of the Collier County Ordinances regulating subdivisions in effect at the time of development; and shall be reviewed and approved in accordance with the procedures set forth by Collier County for that portion of the project under County jurisdiction. The intent and effect of this Section is to have a single set of substantive standards apply to subdivision master plans to the location of the particular property in question, but to allow each local government to apply its procedural process for approval of said plans. The developer reserves the right to request exceptions and modifications to the standards set forth in applicable regulations. Where this document makes reference to a specific type of subdivision approval (e.g. Subdivision Master Plan Approval or platting) this reference shall be construed to mean the applicable Collier County procedure or approval in effect at the time of development. (Revised 4/11/07) 10 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1575 2.09 LAKE SITING As depicted on the MPUD Master Plan, lakes and natural retention areas have been sited adjacent to existing and planned roadways, property lines, and throughout the golf course. The goal is to achieve an overall aesthetic character for the project, to permit optimum use of the land, provide buffering to uses within and surrounding the project, protect native vegetation, and to increase the efficiency of the water management network. Accordingly, the requirements described in applicable County ordinances, may be reduced subject to the approval of the County Engineer at the time of Subdivision and/or excavation permit approval. Fill material from lakes is planned to be utilized within the project, however excess fill material, not to exceed 10% or maximum 20,000 cubic yards may be utilized off-site, subject to the provisions of the Collier County excavation ordinance in effect at the time of development. Removal of fill material in excess of 10% of total or 20,000 cubic yards shall meet the requirements of a commercial excavation per applicable County ordinances. Final lake area determination shall be in accordance with the South Florida Water Management District stormwater criteria and applicable County ordinances. 2.10 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES Roads and other infrastructure may be either public or private, depending on location, capacity, and design. The developer shall create appropriate homeowner and/or condominium associations or identify other entities which will be responsible for maintaining the roads, streets, drainage, water and sewer improvements where such systems are not dedicated to the County or City. Standards for roads shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of Collier County ordinances regulating subdivisions, unless otherwise approved as an exception during subdivision approval. 2.11 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL The provisions of the LDC shall apply to the development of platted tracts or parcels of land as provided in the LDC prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. Approval of commercial tracts in the City of Naples jurisdiction shall follow the General Development and Site Plan (GDSP) process. 2.12 MODEL HOMES AND MODEL UNITS Model Homes and units shall be permitted within this project subject to the following provisions: a) Models may be constructed prior to approval of a plat. b) Models may be permitted as "dry models" and shall obtain a conditional certificate of occupancy for model purposes only. Models may not be permanently occupied until a permanent certificate of occupancy is issued. (Revised 4/11/07) 11 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1576 c) Models may not be utilized as "sales offices" without approval by and through the site development plan process. The site development plan process shall not be required for dry models pursuant to this Section. d) Prior to recording of any plat, metes and bounds legal descriptions shall be provided to and accepted by Collier County as sufficient for building permit issuance. Said metes and bounds legal descriptions shall meet proposed plat configurations and all models constructed pursuant hereto shall conform to applicable minimum square footages, setbacks, and the like as set forth herein. e) Temporary access and utility easements may be provided in lieu of dedicated rights- of-way for temporary service to model homes or units. f) Sales, marketing, and administrative functions shall be permitted to occur in designated model homes or units within the project only as provided herein. 2.13 CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The standards for the construction of all project infrastructure, such as, but not limited to roads, utilities, wastewater treatment, water management facilities, and other site improvements such as but not limited to clearing, grading, excavation, landscaping and all similar types of site improvements, except for habitable buildings and structures, shall meet the minimum standards set forth by Collier County in the applicable ordinance or regulation in effect at time of development. City of Naples construction standards shall be used for water and sewer systems under City jurisdiction. The procedures for the review and approval of project infrastructure and site improvements shall be that process in effect at the time of review and approval in accordance with the City of Naples regulations for that part of the project within City jurisdiction, and Collier County regulations for that part of the project within County jurisdiction. The standards and development permit procedures for all habitable structures shall be in accordance with the appropriate City or County jurisdiction's requirements in effect at the time of building permit application. 2.14 SALES CENTERS a) "Sales Centers" may be constructed prior to recording of a plat. "Sales Centers" may be serviced by a temporary utility system (i.e. dry well and septic tank/drainfield) prior to availability of central utility systems at which time connection to the central system will be made. Interim fire protection facilities, in accordance with NFPA requirements or as approved by the appropriate fire district shall be required unless a permanent water system is available to serve the Center. (Revised 4/9 9/07) 12 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1577 b) Review and approval of "Sales Centers" shall follow the requirements of the site development plan process of the LDC or whatever approval procedure is in effect at that time. A metes and bounds legal description shall be provided as part of the application. Access to the "Sales Center' shall be provided by a paved road or temporary driveway which meets applicable County standards as determined by the County Engineer. A water management plan shall be provided which accommodates the runoff from the "Sales Center', the required parking and access road/driveway and any other impervious surfaces. The system shall be designed to fit in with the master water management system for the entire development. c) At the time of building permit application for a "Sales Center" a temporary use permit shall be obtained. "Sales Centers" may not be occupied until a certificate of occupancy is issued. Models shall obtain a conditional certificate of occupancy for model purposes only. Models may not be occupied until a permanent certificate of occupancy is issued. 2.15 IMPACT FEES Development within the project shall be subject to all lawfully adopted impact fees in effect at the time of development. 2.16 DEVIATIONS" A. Deviation from LDC Section 4.02.24 A.2. and 3. — Corridor Management Overlay District which requires a front yard setback of 100 feet for the first floor of residential dwelling units and a 25 -foot setback for each additional floor. Deviation: Residential structures within the Grey Oaks MPUD shall comply with Section 4.02.24, Corridor Management Overlay District unless an enhanced Type D Buffer, 20 feet in width, containing a wall and landscaping is placed along Golden Gate Parkway between residential development and the Parkway. Residential structures shall be set back a minimum of 2 feet horizontally for every 1 -foot of building height measured from the property line to any point on the building, but in no case shall any residential structure be closer than 100 feet to Golden Gate Parkway. Sections, drawn to scale, shall demonstrate that sight lines from passing passenger cars (4 feet in height) in the center lane of the eastbound lanes of Golden Gate Parkway will break the views to the top of residential buildings within the southeast quadrant of the Grey Oaks MPUD. These tree heights shall be shown on the perimeter buffer landscape site development plan drawings. Trees and shrubs may be planted and maintained by the developer within the Golden Gate Parkway right-of- way provided that a landscape maintenance agreement is executed between the County and developer. B. Deviation to 5.03.02.C.1 of the LDC, Wall Height, which states that fences or walls in residential districts shall be maximum of six (6) feet tall. (Revised 4/11/07) 13 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1578 Within the Grey Oaks MPUD, walls, not to exceed ten feet (10') in height, shall be permitted along both sides of Golden Gate Parkway and along Livingston Road in the northeast and southeast quadrants. The walls shall be located to allow a minimum of five feet (5) of landscaping between the property/right-of-way line and the walls. The intent is to provide consistency within the Grey Oaks project so that existing and proposed walls are of similar height. C. Deviation from Section 6.06.01 J. of the LDC, Dead-end Streets, which states that dead-end streets shall be prohibited except when designed as a cul-de-sac. Culs-de- sac in excess of 1,000 feet shall not be permitted unless topographical conditions or other natural features preclude a street layout to avoid longer culs-de-sac. Within the southeast quadrant, a deviation is requested to allow for cul-de-sac streets to be 2,300 feet in length providing that roadway and cul-de-sac lengths do not conflict with the County Fire Protection Ordinance. D. Deviation from Section 6.06.02 A.3 of the LDC, Sidewalks and Bike Lane Requirements, which states that sidewalks five (5) feet in width must be provided on both sides of local streets. In the Grey Oaks MPUD, local streets that only provide access to residential units placed on one side of a cul-de-sac street shall be required to be served by a 6 -foot sidewalk on the side of the street serving the residential units. No sidewalk shall be required on the side of the street without residential units. * Deviations apply to Southeast Quadrant only. 2.17 GENERAL Development of Grey Oaks shall proceed in accordance with the contents of this Document, MPUD-Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District, applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan and the regulations in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of issuance of any development orders to which said regulations relate governing the permitting and construction of improvements, such as but not limited to final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit and preliminary work authorization. Where these regulations fail to provide development standards then the provisions of the most similar district in the County Land Development Code shall apply. (Revised 4/11/07) 14 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1579 THE GREY OAKS PUD TABLE I LAND USE SUMMARY Northeast and Southeast Quadrants (Collier Countv) Note: Native Vegetation Preserve in Northeast and Southeast Quadrants totals 79.36 acres. (See attached Drawings E-1 through E-4 for locations). Northwest Quadrant (City of Naples) AMOUNT ACREAGE Residential units 1,311 D.U. 332.06 Ac. Commercial (Total) 1,203,091 S.F. 70.4 +/- Ac. Office (gross floor area) 593,453 S.F. Retail (gross leasable area) 609,638 S.F. Hotel 0 Rooms 0 Ac. Golf Course/Recreation/ Park/Right of Way 54 Holes 614.31 Ac. Lake/ Water Management 225.41 Ac. Conservation 5.32 Ac. Sub -Total 1,247.45 Ac. Note: Native Vegetation Preserve in Northeast and Southeast Quadrants totals 79.36 acres. (See attached Drawings E-1 through E-4 for locations). Northwest Quadrant (City of Naples) Note: Native Vegetation Preserve in Northwest Quadrant totals 58.63 acres. (See attached Drawings E- 1 through E-4 for locations). Note: All acreages are digitized approximate acreages and are subject to change and variation. Note: The Northeast Quadrant shall have a total commercial/office square footage of 1,203,091 S.F. (Revised 4/11/07) 15 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1580 AMOUNT ACREAGE Residential units 464 d.u. 100.71 +/- Ac. Commercial (Total) 100,000 S.F. 14.4 +/- Ac. Office (gross floor area) 60,000 S.F. Retail (gross leasable area) 40,000 S.F. Golf Course/Recreation/ Park/Right-of- Way 18 Holes 107.4 +/- Ac. Lake/ Water Management 76.04 +/- Ac. Conservation 55.34 +/- Ac. Sub -Total 353.89 Ac. Note: Native Vegetation Preserve in Northwest Quadrant totals 58.63 acres. (See attached Drawings E- 1 through E-4 for locations). Note: All acreages are digitized approximate acreages and are subject to change and variation. Note: The Northeast Quadrant shall have a total commercial/office square footage of 1,203,091 S.F. (Revised 4/11/07) 15 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1580 THE GREY OAKS PUD TABLE II PROJECT ABSORPTION SCHEDULE ESTIMATE PROJECT YEAR 1-6 (1989-1995) Land Use No. Hotel Square Designation Units Rooms Feet Residential 94 Commercial (GLA) and Office (GFA) 0 Hotel 0 Golf Course* 1 * Golf Course = 18 holes with phased club facilities PROJECT YEAR 7-13 (1996-2001) CUMULATIVE Land Use No. Hotel Square Designation Units Rooms Feet Residential 963 Commercial (GLA) and Office (GFA) 500,000 Golf Course* 3 * Gold Course = 54 holes with phased club facilities (Second golf course may be constructed prior to project year 7, and may be built in 9 -hole increments, club facilities may be built in phases to coincide with the golf course construction). (Revised 4/11/07) 16 9.D.7 0 a Y a� /L^ V 00 v LO T" O 0 0 ti T 0 N J a 0 c 0 ca .Q a Q LL c m E 0 r a a� E z U ns r Q Packet Pg. 1581 TABLE ll (Continued) PROJECT ABSORPTION SCHEDULE ESTIMATES PROJECT YEAR 14-20 CUMULATIVE Land Use No. Hotel Square Designation Units Rooms Feet (GLA) Residential 1775 Commercial (GLA) and Office (GFA) 1,303,091 Golf Course` 4 " Golf Course = 72 holes with full club facilities (3`d golf course may be constructed after year 14, and may be built in 9 -hole increments, club facilities may be built in phases to coincide with the golf course construction). Project years shall be adjusted to correspond with the commencement of development. The above development program outlines multi -use categories which will be assigned to the various development pods shown on Map H-1. These land use categories will allow for a true mixed use development to occur and allow the "developer" to respond to an ever changing market over the next 20 years with an anticipated buildout at year 2010. The absorption schedule assumes that build -out of the residential, town center and majority of the office and commercial uses may occur in the first 12 years. (Revised 4/11/07) 17 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1582 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL LAND USE 3.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for the areas designated on Map H-1, Planned Unit Development Master Plan, as "R" or Residential. 3.02 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS A maximum number of 1,775 dwelling units may be constructed on lands designated as "R" or Residential. The 25 +/- acre parcel designated "R" on the MPUD Master Plan located on Livingston Road, south of Golden Gate Parkway may be devoted to Assisted Living Facilities at a floor -to -area ratio not to exceed .45. 3.03 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as "R" or Residential on the Master Land Use Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of residential dwelling unit types. Approximate configurations of land use tracts have been indicated on the MPUD Master Plan, in order to indicate relative size and distribution of the residential uses. These acreages are based on conceptual designs and must be considered to be approximate. Actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of platting. Residential tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways. 3.04 PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES 1) Detached and attached single family homes, cluster homes, zero lot line homes, patio homes, townhomes, multi -family dwellings, neighborhood recreational facilities, churches and other places of worship, and assisted living facilities. 2) Water management facilities; essential services (in accordance with the LDC). Lakes, including lakes with seawall and other types of architectural bank treatment. 3) Open space recreational activities, community parks, and similar uses, including but not limited to shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, swimming pools, boat docks and ramp, canoe launches, fishing piers, boat storage, beach gazebos, concession stands, health trails, bike paths and nature trails, observation platforms, boardwalks, playground, picnic areas and other types of facilities intended for outdoor recreation. 4) Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible in the district. (Revised 4/11/07) 18 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1583 3.05 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES 1) Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with uses permitted in this District. 2) Essential services and facilities, as defined in the LDC. 3) Recreational facilities accessory to a residential structure. 4) Any other accessory uses or structures which are comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible in the district. 3.06 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Table III sets forth the development standards for land uses within the "R" Residential District. Site development standards for categories 1, 2, and 3, uses apply to individual lot boundaries; standards for category 4 uses apply to platted development parcel boundaries. Front yard setbacks shall be measured as follows: 1) If the parcel is served by a City or County dedicated public right-of-way, setback is measured from the existing right-of-way line. 2) If the parcel is served by a private drive, setback is measured from back of curb or edge of pavement, whichever is closer to the structure. 3) Single family detached (Category 1 only) front setbacks shall be measured from the public or private road right-of-way line. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs, guard houses, entrance gates and other land uses not specified herein shall be in accordance with the LDC Code regulations in effect at the time permits are requested unless otherwise specified herein. Unless otherwise indicated, setback, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. Development standards for residential uses not specifically set forth in Table III shall be established during subdivision master plan or site development plan approval as set forth under Sections 2.03 and 2.11 of this Document. Setbacks and other buffer requirements from and along the north property line within the northwest quadrant adjacent to lots on Coach House Lane shall be as follows: a) One story single family structure: (Revised 4/11/07) 19 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1584 Principal — 25' Accessory — 15' b) One story multi -family or two story structure: Principal — 50' Accessory — 50' c) Two story structure greater than 30' in height: Principal — 75' Accessory — 75' d) Three story structure: Principal — 175' Accessory —175' e) Four story structure: Principal — 400' Accessory — 400' f) Vehicular use areas, including garages and carports — 50' (measured to the structure or edge of pavement). g) A 15' wide, as measured perpendicular to said north border, and 25 foot high landscaped buffer shall be provided and maintained which is 80% opaque as measured in every and any 25 by 25 foot section. The buffer shall be installed prior to construction of homes. h) The number of dwelling units per acre shall not exceed 7 units per net acre measured within a band of land 175 feet wide parallel to said north boundary. i) Principal building structures shall not include more than 4 dwelling units within 175 feet of said north boundary. *Two story setback is measured to the second story portion of the structure. One story portion is to be measured as a one story structure, if it is a single family structure. (Revised 4/11/07) 20 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1585 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FLOOR AREA VILLAS 5*4*5 2500 SF/Lot 16' N/A 0' H 10' P 0' GC 10' P 0' GC 2 7' MINIMUM (S.F.) 1200 1000 900 750 900 SITE DEPTH AVERAGE: Determined by dividing the site area by the site width. SITE WIDTH: The average distance between straight lines connecting front and rear parcel lines at each side of the site, measured as straight lines between the foremost points of the side parcel lines in the front (at the point of the intersection with the front parcel line) and the rearmost point of the parcel lines at the rear (point of intersection with the rear parcel line). May be reduced on cul-de-sac lots. (Revised 4/11/07) 21 9.D.7 0 D a Y O a� /L^ V 0o v LO 0 0 0 T N J a 0 c 0 W .Q a Q U_ c a) E U ns a a� E U n: r Q Packet Pg. 1586 "R" Residential Areas TABLE III PATIO, ZLL, OR SINGLE SINGLE TWO FAMILY CLUSTER FAMILY FAMILY ATTACHED/ MULTI -FAMILY DETACHED DETACHED OR DUPLEX TOWN HOUSE CATEGORY 1 *4 2 *4 3 *4 4 *4 MINIMUM SITE 9000 5000 35000 1 AC AREA SF/Lot SF/Lot SF/Lot SITE WIDTH 75' 50' 35' 150' MIN.AVG. SITE DEPTH 120' 100' 100' 150' MIN. AVG. FRONT YARD 25' 20' 20'*1 20'P SETBACK SIDE YARD 7.5' 5' 0 or a *6 20' P SETBACK minimum 0' GC of 5' REAR YARD 20' P 15'P 15'P 20' P SETBK PRINCIPAL 10' GC 10' GC 10' GC 0' GC REAR YARD 101P 10' P 10' P 10' P SETBACK ACSRY. 0' GC 0' GC 0' GC 0' GC MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT STORIES ABOVE PARKING 2 2 2 6 *2 DIST.BETWEEN PRINCIPAL STR. 15' 10' 0' or 5' *6 15*3 -1 story 25' *3- 2-3 story 30' *3- 4 stories & higher FLOOR AREA VILLAS 5*4*5 2500 SF/Lot 16' N/A 0' H 10' P 0' GC 10' P 0' GC 2 7' MINIMUM (S.F.) 1200 1000 900 750 900 SITE DEPTH AVERAGE: Determined by dividing the site area by the site width. SITE WIDTH: The average distance between straight lines connecting front and rear parcel lines at each side of the site, measured as straight lines between the foremost points of the side parcel lines in the front (at the point of the intersection with the front parcel line) and the rearmost point of the parcel lines at the rear (point of intersection with the rear parcel line). May be reduced on cul-de-sac lots. (Revised 4/11/07) 21 9.D.7 0 D a Y O a� /L^ V 0o v LO 0 0 0 T N J a 0 c 0 W .Q a Q U_ c a) E U ns a a� E U n: r Q Packet Pg. 1586 P. Perimeter of Internal Sites GC = Golf Course, or Lake Front Sites *1 This setback may be reduced to 10' for side entry garage *2 Three story maximum within the City of Naples for less than 8 units per acre. Four story maximum within the City of Naples for 8 units per acre or greater. *3 or % the sum of the adjacent buildings, whichever is greater. The following sentence applies to the Southeast Quadrant only. Where adjacent multi -family buildings are clustered about a common access to garage parking or courtyards, and share a common architectural theme and are a minimum of 2 stories in height, the minimum distance between the buildings shall be 40% of the sum to the heights of the two multi -family buildings. *4 During the County approval process, tracts shall be designated and approved as a specific category. The approved specific category shall not be changed unless the entire tract is consistent with the new category. Any change from an approved category to another shall be accomplished per the LDC. *5 In the context here used, the term "villas" means development that occurs on a platted lot where the lots tend to form a clustered home siting scheme accessed by an irregularly shaped private roadway system. *6 For patio homes with less than a 5 foot side yard setback, the opposite side setback shall be sufficient so that the combined setbacks equal 10 feet. Once the first building, on the side of a street utilizing this product type is permitted, all subsequent buildings shall follow the pattern established by the first unit. For example, a 3 foot setback on one lot must be followed by a 7 foot setback on the next lot or vice versa. (Revised 4/11/07) 22 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1587 SECTION IV GOLF COURSE/RECREATION/PARK/RIGHT-OF-WAY 4.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for the areas designated on Map H-1 Planned Unit Development Master Plan as, golf course, clubhouse, driving range, right-of-ways; dedicated easements and utility corridors. 4.02 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1) Golf Course(s) 2) Tennis Club and facilities 3) Water management facilities; essential services (in accordance with the LDC). Lakes, including lakes with seawall and other types of architectural bank treatment. 4) Open space recreational activities, community parks, and similar uses, including but not limited to shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, swimming pools, boat docks and ramp, canoe launches, fishing piers, boat storage, beach gazebos, concession stands, health trails, bike paths and nature trails, observation platforms, boardwalks, playground, picnic areas and other types of facilities intended for outdoor recreation. 5) Community center/clubhouse(s). 6) Storage, maintenance yards, and landscaping nurseries within FP&L easements, rights-of-way, and open space. Subject to approval of the persons or entities in whose favor the easement or right-of-way runs. 7) Project Information and Sales Center. 8) Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible in the district. (Revised 4/11/07) 23 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1588 B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Standards Accessory uses customarily associated with the principal uses permitted in this district including but not limited to: 1) Pro -shop, practice driving range, cart barn and other customary accessory uses of golf courses, or other recreational facilities, including maintenance area, and pump houses, golf courses rain shelters, restrooms, and snack bars. 2) Small commercial establishments, including gift shops, golf and tennis equipment sales, restaurants, cocktail lounges, and similar uses intended to serve patrons of the golf course or other permitted recreational facilities, subject to the provisions of the applicable supplementary district regulations of the Land Development Code of Collier County. 3) Vehicle wash facility. 4.03 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1) Overall site design shall be harmonious in terms of landscaping, enclosure of structures, location of access streets and parking areas and location and treatment of buffer areas. 2) Buildings shall be set back a minimum of ten (10') feet from parcel boundaries, except for common boundaries between golf course, recreation and park uses, and water management facilities, in which case the setback is zero (0') feet. 3) Maximum height of structures: Fifty (50') feet, unless abutting a residentially zoned parcel, then thirty five (35') feet. 4) Minimum distance between principal buildings: Five (5) feet — 1 and 2 story buildings that are a part of an architecturally unified grouping of structures. Ten (10') feet — 1 story. Twenty (20') feet — 2 story. 5) Setback for structures from parcel boundaries abutting residential areas: Twenty (20') feet — principal structures. (Revised 4/11/07) 24 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1589 Ten (10') feet — accessory structures. 6) Parking for the community center/clubhouse shall be one space per every two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area, which shall be considered inclusive of required golf course parking. 7) Standards for parking, landscaping, signs, guard houses, entrance gates and other land uses not specified herein are to be in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code regulations in effect at the time permits are requested unless otherwise specified herein. Unless otherwise indicated, setback, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. 8) A 10 -foot wide combination berm, landscaping, and wall buffer shall be provided along the south side of the FPL easement paralleling Golden Gate Parkway within the northwest quadrant adjacent to golf course and residential uses. The berm shall be no higher than 2 feet and the wall no higher than 8 feet. Landscaping shall be placed in front of the wall screening a minimum of 50% of the wall. An additional 10 - foot landscape buffer shall be placed along the north edge of the FPL easement where said easement abuts golf course or residential uses. Golf course is allowed within the 10 -foot wide buffer. (Revised 4/11107) 25 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1590 SECTION V CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE AREAS 5.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for areas designated on Map H-1 as conservation and open space. 5.02A PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES -- CONSERVATION AREAS No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1) Passive recreational areas, boardwalks, observation platforms. 2) Biking, hiking, health and nature trails, canoe launches, golf cart paths. 3) Water management facilities, roadway crossings and utility crossings. 4) Lighting and signage. 5) Any other activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible with the intent of this district. 5.0213 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES — OPEN SPACE AREAS No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1) Parks, passive recreational areas, boardwalks, observation platforms. 2) Biking, hiking, health and nature trails, boat docks, fishing piers, canoe launches, boat storage, golf cart paths. 3) Equestrian paths. 4) Water management facilities and lakes, as approved by the South Florida Water Management District, roadway crossings and utility crossings. 5) Recreational shelters, active park facilities, and restrooms, off street parking, lighting and signage. (Revised 4/11/07) 26 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1591 6) Any other activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible with the intent of this district. 5.03 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1) Overall site design shall be harmonious with the area's natural characteristics 2) All work proposed in wetland areas designated on the Master Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Collier County Environmental Staff and appropriate county, state or federal regulatory or jurisdictional agency prior to the commencement of any such activity. 3) The County may request copies of permits from all appropriate regulatory agencies or jurisdictional agency prior to construction plan approval. Conservation areas shall be subject to jurisdictional agencies review and listed uses do not guarantee that those uses will be approved. 4) Standards for parking, landscaping, signs, guard houses, entrance gates and other land uses not specified herein are to be in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code regulations in effect at the time permits are requested unless otherwise specified herein. (Revised 4/11/07) 27 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1592 SECTION VI COMMERCIAL 6.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to set forth the regulation for the area designated on Map H-1 MPUD Master Plan, as "C" Commercial "O/C" Office Commercial, "O" Office, and "Town Center". These are areas located within a designated activity center, therefore permitted uses for these tracts are intended to be inclusive of all types allowed by the City of Naples and the Collier County LDC. 6.02 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1) Permitted Principal Uses and Structures for C, O/C, and Town Center Tracts: (a) Antique shops; appliance stores; art studios; art supply shops; automobile parts stores; automobile service stations without repairs*1; awning shops. (b) Bakery shops including baking; bait and tackle shops*2; banks and financial institutions, including drive-in windows; barber and beauty shops; bath supply stores; bicycle sales and services; blueprint shops; bookbinder; book stores; business machine services; business offices, building maintenance services and building supplies. (c) Cabinet shops, canteen services, building maintenance services, building supplies, carpet and floor covering sales — which may include storage and installation; car wash; child care centers; churches and other places of worship *1; clothing stores; cocktail lounges*1; commercial schools; confectionery and candy stores, concessions and vendors; civic and cultural facilities colleges, universities and schools; convalescent centers and nursing homes; computer sales and services*2. (d) Delicatessens; department stores; drug stores; dry cleaning, collecting and delivery; dry goods stores; drapery shops; department stores. (e) Electrical supply stores; express office; employment agencies; equipment rentals repair and sales including lawn mowers and power saws. (f) Farmers market*2, fish stores — retail only; florist shops; fraternal and social clubs*1; food markets; furniture stores; furrier shops. (g) Garden supply stores — outside display in side and rear yards*2; gift shops; glass and mirror sales — including storage and installation; gourmet shops; gunsmiths. (Revised 4/11/07) 28 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1593 (h) Hardware stores; health food store; homes for the aged; hospitals and hospices; hobby supply stores. (i) ice cream stores, indoor commercial recreation, interior decorating showrooms. Q) Jewelry stores. (k) Laundries; laboratories, film research and testing; leather goods; luggage stores; linen supply shops; lithograph; laboratories; liquor stores; locksmiths; lakes and water bodies with seawalls and architectural bank treatments, or conventional lake banks. (1) Markets — food; markets — meat; medical offices and clinics; millinery shops; motion picture theaters; museums; music stores; mortgage brokers. (m) New car dealerships — outside display permitted; news stores; night clubs*2*1. (n) Office — general — business, and professional; office supply stores. (o) Paint and wall paper stores; post offices; pet shops; photographic equipment stores; pottery stores*2; printing*2; publishing and mimeograph service shops*2; private clubs*2*1; plumbing shops and supplies. (p) Radio, television and appliance sales and services; radio stations (offices and studios), and auxiliary transmitters and receiving equipments, but not principal transmission tower; research design and development; real estate offices; rest homes; restaurants — including drive-in or fast food restaurants and full service *1; retail sales of used goods; all uses permitted in Section III and IV of this Document — subject to development standards identified in those Sections. (q) Small scale retail sales other than shopping centers; shoe sales and repair; shopping centers*1; souvenir stores; stationery stores; supermarkets; sanatoriums. (r) Tailor shops; taxidermists; tile sales — ceramic tile; tobacco shops; toy shops; tropical fish stores; telephone exchange shops; transportation, communication and utility offices. (s) Variety stores; vehicle rentals, veterinarian offices and clinics — no outside kennels. (t) Watch and precision instrument sales and repair shops. (Revised 4/11/07) 29 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1594 (u) Any other commercial use or professional service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible in the district. (v) Any other commercial uses set forth in the City of Naples Development Agreement. 2) Permitted Uses and Structures for "O" (Office) Tracts: (a) Art studios (b) Banks and financial institutions, including drive-in windows; book stores; business offices. (c) Child care centers; churches and other places of worship; commercial schools; civic and cultural facilities; colleges, universities and schools. (d) Express office; employment agencies. (e) Fraternal and social clubs"1. (f) Homes for the aged; hospitals and hospices. (g) Laboratories; lakes and water bodies with seawalls and architectural bank treatments, or conventional lake banks. (h) Medical offices and clinics; mortgage brokers. (i) Office — general — business, and professional; office supply stores. 0) Private clubs*2. (k) Radio stations (offices and studios, and auxiliary transmitters and receiving equipment, but not principal transmission tower); research design and development; real estate offices; all uses permitted in Section III and IV of this document — subject to development standards identified in those Sections. (1) Transportation, communication and utility offices. (m) Veterinarian offices and clinics — no outside kennels. (n) Any other commercial use or professional service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Collier County Planning Services Manager or the City Community Development Director determines to be compatible in the district. (Revised 4/11/07) 30 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1595 3) Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures; Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this district. (a) Caretaker's residence*1 6.03 Development Standards 1) Minimum Lot Area: Ten thousand (10,000) square feet. 2) Minimum Lot Width: One hundred feet (100') 3) Minimum Setback Requirements (internal): (a) Front setback — Twenty feet (20'). (b) Side setback — None, or a minimum of five feet (5) with unobstructed passage from front to rear yard. (c) Rear setback — Fifteen feet (16). (d) Waterfront setback — Zero feet (0') to seawall, bulkhead, or rip rap, otherwise fifteen feet (16). (e) Parcels with two frontages may reduce one front setback by ten feet (10'). 4) Minimum setbacks and buffer from external rights-of-way: (a) Golden Gate Parkway — Fifty foot (50') setback, Twenty foot (20') landscape buffer. (b) Airport Road and Livingston Road — Twenty foot (20') plus two feet (2') for every one foot (1') of building height; twenty foot (20') landscape buffer. 5) Maximum Height: Fifty (50) feet. 6) Minimum Floor Area of Structures: One thousand (1,000 square feet per building) on the ground floor. Kiosk vendors, concessions, and temporary or mobile sales structures are permitted to have a minimum structure of twenty-five (25) square feet, and are not bound by setback requirements. 7) Maximum Floor Area Ratios (FAR) for Commercial Uses: Based on gross leaseable floor area (GLFA) and acreage. Retail: Office: (Revised 4/11/07) 30 Project total 649,638 GLFA 35 Project total 653,453 Gross Floor Area 31 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1596 8) Distance Between Structures: Same as for side yard setback. 9) Standards for parking, landscaping, signs, guard houses, entrance gates and other land uses not specified herein are to be in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code regulations in effect at the time permits are requested unless otherwise specified herein. Unless otherwise indicated, setback, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. 10) A twenty-five (25) foot landscape strip of land shall be provided along all arterial road commercial frontages. 11) The public internal loop road in the Northeast quadrant shall be constructed in accordance with Collier County standards. 12) An 8 -foot high wall may be installed on grade, on a landscape berm, on golf course mounding, or on driving range mounding, within a residential, golf course, club, golf facility or commercial parcel to buffer the commercial uses from the residential and other uses. *1 In accordance with LDC requirements for this type of use. *2 Northeast and Southeast quadrants only. (Revised 4/11/07) 32 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1597 SECTION VII GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 7.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments of the project. 7.02 MPUD MASTER PLAN 1) The P.U.D. Master Plan — Map H-1 is an illustrative preliminary development plan. The design criteria and layout illustrated on the Master Plan shall be understood to be flexible, so that, the final design may satisfy project criteria and comply with all applicable requirements of this Ordinance. 2) All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities. 3) Site design changes shall be permitted subject to Collier County and/or City of Naples staff administrative approval, where such changes are consistent with the intent of this MPUD and do not cause significant impact to surrounding properties abutting the Grey Oaks MPUD. 7.03 ENVIRONMENTAL 1) The developer shall be subject to Collier County Growth Management Plan Conservation and Coastal Management Element and applicable County ordinances. The 25% shall be monitored at each site clearing plan submittal. The developer shall receive credit from any phase where the 25% amount is exceeded to be applied to a phase where it is not. In any phase of development where credit toward the 25% is needed the developer shall delineate on the site clearing plan the percentage of viable naturally functioning native vegetation retained and/or areas of landscaping and open space which are planted with native species. The developer shall show the calculations on each site clearing plan which totals the overall 25% for the project build -out. The entire MPUD has been evaluated for native/viable vegetation at the time of platting or site development plan approval and such vegetated area has been determined to be 551.94 acres. This includes 13.31 acres of native vegetation within the Golden Gate Parkway right-of-way. The total assumes that the eastern -most parcel in the southeast quadrant contains 15.03 acres of native vegetation. [Preserving 25% requires 137.99 acres while 137.10 acres of native vegetation has been preserved.] The eastern -most parcel in the southeast quadrant shall provide .89 acres of native vegetation preserve to satisfy the 25% preservation requirement stipulated in Paragraph 7.03.1 above. See Drawings (Revised 4/11/07) 33 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1598 E-1 through E-4 locations of native vegetation. The required retained native vegetation shown on the preserve drawings, Exhibits E-1 through E-4 may be modified administratively by the Environmental Review Staff, providing that an equal area of existing native vegetation of equal or greater habitat value is provided in a preserve area that meets the requirements of the LDC in effect at the time of any such modification. To accomplish this, the property owner shall apply to the County and obtain approval for an amendment to the underlying SDP or plat and construction plans. 2) The developer shall obtain all necessary local, state and federal permits. Copies of appropriate jurisdictional delineations are required at the time of subdivision master pian per the County Engineer. 3) Protected plant species (butterfly orchid) and those which may be observed during each construction phase shall be protected from injury or relocated on site. The existing locations as well as the transplantation locations, if warranted, shall be identified on the site clearing plan for each phase of construction. 4) The developer must receive all appropriate state approvals for storing and handling hazardous materials prior to construction of the golf maintenance facilities. All hazardous materials will be stored in a central location, removed from the Gordon River headwaters or Golden Gate Canal. There will be no storage of hazardous materials that is in excess of two (2) days supply, at the satellite facilities. However, petroleum storage at these facilities shall be allowed, but only in above ground storage facilities constructed and maintained in accordance with EPA and FDER standards. The developer shall submit any required contingency plans approved by appropriate state and federal agencies for clean up and mitigation of unauthorized release of hazardous materials. 5) Buffers around protected wetlands shall comply with South Florida Water Management District criteria. 6) Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Rules and Regulations, as well as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permitting program. Removal of exotic vegetation shall not be the sole means of mitigation for impacts to Collier County jurisdictional wetlands. 7) All conservation areas shall be recorded on the plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Conservation areas shall be dedicated on the plat to the project's homeowners' association, or like entity, for ownership and maintenance responsibilities, and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance. (Revised 4/11/07) 34 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1599 8) An exotic vegetation eradication, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic free) plan for the site, with emphasis on conservation/preservation areas, shall be submitted to the Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 9) The developer shall coordinate protected wildlife species issues through the ERP and Corps Section 404 permit review process and comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) made part of any ERP or Section 404 permit issuance. Where protected species occur on site, a Habitat Management Plan for those protected species shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 7.04 WATER MANAGEMENT 1) Detailed, paving, grading and site drainage plans shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by Engineering Review Services. 2) In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District, (SFWMD) Chapters 40E-4 and 40E-40, this project shall be designed for a storm event of 3 -day duration and 25 -year return frequency. 3) An excavation permit shall be required for the proposed lake(s) in accordance with applicable County ordinances and SFWMD Rules. Several of the lakes proposed do not meet the minimum setback requirements of County ordinances. The Master Plan shall be revised to meet the minimum setback requirements or documentation shall be provided during the subdivision master plan process to allow a reduction in the setback with appropriate barriers provided. 4) The lake and swale typical cross-sections shall conform to all applicable County ordinances. 5) Detailed site drainage plans of each drainage sub -basin shall be submitted to the Environmental Advisory Board, or its successor, for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of each individual drainage sub - basin is granted by the Engineering Review Services. 6) An executed agreement between the applicant, Big Cypress Basin and the South Florida Water Management District, detailed plans and associated documentation relating to the installation of the new control structure and the relocation of the existing amil gate structure including back pump facilities shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services for review prior to construction plan approval. (Revised 4/11/07) 35 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1600 7) A copy of the South Florida Water Management District Conceptual Permit or favorable staff report shall be required prior to subdivision master plan approval. 8) A copy of South Florida Water Management District Permit or Early Work Permit is required prior to construction plan approval. 9) Documentation from Florida Power and Light allowing use of their right-of-way for the purposes of water management shall be provided prior to subdivision master plan approval. 10) This approval does not constitute agreement by the County to any control elevation or discharge rate. All agreements shall be made with South Florida Water Management District/Big Cypress Basin. 7.05 TRANSPORTATION 1) The developer shall provide appropriate left and/or right turn lanes on Airport Road, Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road at all project accesses. This provision shall be permitted and implemented along with a corresponding site development plan or plat. 2) The developer shall provide arterial level street lighting at all project accesses. This provision shall be permitted and implemented a long with a corresponding site development plan or plat. 3) The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of traffic signals, including interconnection where applicable, at any project access when deemed warranted by the County. The signals will be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. 4) Livingston Road Right of Way Dedication: a) The developer shall dedicate sufficient right of way north of Golden Gate Parkway to establish a right-of-way corridor 120 feet in width along the entire length of the developer's property, taking into consideration the existing Livingston Road right-of-way easement. Additional right-of-way within the Florida Power and Light easement may be required subject to approval and releases by Florida Power and Light. The developer shall pay, or may utilize reduction of existing impact fee credits in the amount of $30,000 in full satisfaction of the developer's obligation to reimburse the County for the County's costs in negotiating and obtaining any approval and releases by Florida Power and Light necessary to fulfill the 120 foot right-of-way width requirements. b) The developer shall dedicate 50' feet or road right of way south of Golden Gate Parkway along the length of the developer's property. In addition, for a (Revised 4/11/07) 36 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1601 9.D.7 distance of 200 feet south of Golden Gate Parkway, the developer shall dedicate an additional 50 feet in width immediately west of the aforementioned right-of-way. Said additional 50 feet in width may be in the form of a 25 foot wide road right-of-way dedication and 25 foot wide easement for drainage, water management, landscaping, and bikepath use. For the next 800 feet south of Golden Gate Parkway, the developer shall dedicate a strip of land tapering from 50 feet in width in the north to 0 feet in width in the south, in a diminishing line immediately west of the aforementioned right-of-way. Said additional property shall, to the extent it exceeds 25 feet, be in the form of an easement for drainage, water management, landscaping, and bikepath use. The "easements" (as opposed to the dedications) specified herein may be used to satisfy all or part of the setback, and buffer requirements for the adjacent property. The land to be dedicated by the developer, as described above, consists of a total of 3.891 acres, and is identical to parcels 137 and 937 which are the subject of a Stipulated Order of Taking, dated July 24, 1998, entered in Collier County Circuit Court Case No. 98-1635 CA. The developer and County agree that the developer shall be entitled to impact fee credits for the 3.891 acres comprising parcels 137 and 937 at the rate of $85,000 per acre for a total credit of $330,735 for this additional land dedication. c) The requirement in Grey Oaks DRI Development Order 90-3 at paragraph 5.c. (iv) that the applicant build Livingston Road from Golden Gate Parkway south to the beginning of the northern approach to the bridge over the Golden Gate Canal (based upon the cost of a two lane rural roadway) shall be fully satisfied by the reduction of existing or future impact fee credits, in the amount of One Hundred Eighty -Five Thousand Dollars ($185,000). 5) The developer shall dedicate 40 feet of right-of-way along the north side of Golden Gate Parkway west of Airport Road along the entire length of the developer's property, shall incorporate the Golden Gateway Parkway drainage into the water management system of the developer's project, and shall accept all drainage from both a quality and quantity standpoint. 6) The developer shall dedicate 40 feet for right of way on each side of Golden Gate Parkway between Airport Road and Livingston Road within four (4) months of a written request from the County. 7) Collier County reserves the right to expand the lanes on Airport Road by adjusting the cross section of the existing canal to incorporate road run off in the lake system. 8) The developer shall dedicate sufficient right-of-way at the intersection of Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway to allow a grade separated urban interchange with Golden Gateway Parkway being the grade separated roadway. (Revised 4/11/07) 37 Packet Pg. 1602 9) All traffic control devices used, excluding street name signs, shall conform with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices as required by Chapter 316.0747, Florida Statues. 10) If Collier County adopts a proportionate share or area -wide transportation assessment program, or modifies its Impact Fee Ordinance, to provide additional credit for right-of-way dedication, the developer shall be entitled to such a credit towards the 25 acres more or less of dedication. It is understood that the total amount of land involved in these dedications is equal to 25 acres more or less. 11) The number, type, and location of, and allowable changes to project access intersections with County roads shall be as set forth in Exhibit D-1 to the Grey Oaks DRI/Grey Oaks Development Order. 12) Impact fee payments shall be made to Collier County pursuant to the Impact Fee Ordinance in effect at the time of relevant permit application. 13) The County and the developer shall explore whether it would be in their individual best interests and mutual advantage for the developer to incorporate some of the storm water discharge from Golden Gate Parkway into the water management system for the southeastern quadrant of Grey Oaks. In the event the parties agree that it is in their respective best interest, cost sharing or impact fee credits may be used to recompense the developer for costs associated with said conveyance or storage. 7.06 UTILITIES 1) The water distribution system and appurtenant facilities to serve the project shall be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained pursuant to the requirements of the City of Naples. 2) The sewage collection, transmission and treatment and disposal facilities to serve the portions of the project on the west side of Airport Road shall be designed, construction, conveyed, owned, and maintained pursuant to the requirements of the City of Naples. 3) Provisions for sewer service to those portions of the project lying on the east side of Airport Road shall be as follows, unless a service area modification is approved between the City of Naples and the Collier County Water -Sewer District prior to the submissions of subdivision master plan applications to Collier County for the project. a) The sewage collection and transmission and interim sewage treatment facilities to serve the portions of the project on the east side of Airport (Revised 4/11/07) 38 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1603 Road are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with applicable county ordinances and regulations. b) All customers connecting to the sewage collection facilities to be constructed will be customers of the County and will be billed by the County in accordance with the County's established rates. Should the County not be in a position to provide sewer service to the project, the sewer customers shall be customers of the interim utility established to serve the project until the County's off-site water and/or sewer facilities are available to serve the project. C) It is anticipated that the County Utilities Division will ultimately receive and treat the sewage generated by this project. Should the County system not be in a position to receive the project's wastewater, at the time development commences (that generates wastewater), the developer, at its expense will install and operate interim on-site sewage treatment and disposal facilities adequate to meet all requirements of the appropriate regulatory agencies. An agreement shall be entered into between the County and the developer, its assigns or successors, regarding any interim treatment facilities to be utilized. The agreement must be legally sufficient to the County, prior to the approval of construction documents for the project and be in conformance with applicable County ordinances. d) The utility construction documents for the project's sewerage system shall be prepared to contain the design and construction of the on-site force main, which will ultimately connect the project to the future central sewerage facilities of the District in the Airport Road rights-of-way. The force main must be extended from the main on-site pump station site to the east right-of-way line of Airport Road and capped. It shall be interconnected to the pump station with appropriately located valves to permit for simple redirection of the project's sewage when connection to the County's central sewer facilities becomes available. e) Prior to the approval of construction documents that provide for development that generates wastewater by the County, the developer shall present verification pursuant to Chapter 367, Florida Statutes, that the Florida Public Service Commission has granted territorial rights to the developer to provide the service through its sewer facilities. f) The project's developer(s), their assigns or successors shall negotiate an Agreement with the Collier County Water -Sewer District for the use of treated sewage effluent within the project limits for irrigation purposes. The developer shall be responsible for providing all on-site piping and pumping facilities from the County's point of delivery to the project and negotiate with the County to provide full or partial on-site storage facilities, (Revised 4/11/07) 39 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1604 as required by the DEP, consistent with the volume of treated wastewater to be utilized. g) All subdivision master plans shall identify the location of interim wastewater treatment facilities required. In addition, documentation shall be provided to verify that the site is of adequate size for the facility intended. 7.07 SIGNAGE 1) General a) All County sign regulations shall apply unless such regulations are in conflict with the conditions set forth in this section. b) For the purpose of this MPUD Document/Ordinance, each platted parcel shall be considered a separate parcel of land and shall be entitled to any sign as permitted herein. C) Should any of the signs be requested be placed within the public right-of- way, a right-of-way permit shall be applied for and approved. d) All signs shall be located so as not to cause sight distance problems. 2) Entrance Signs a) Two (2) signs with a maximum area of 60 square feet each or one (1) sign with a maximum area of 100 square feet shall be permitted at each entrance of the development. b) Entrance signs shall not exceed a height of fifteen (15) feet above the finished ground level of the sign site. c) Entrance signs may be lighted provided all lights are shielded. 3) Project Signs a) Project signs, designed to promote the project, or any major use within the project shall be permitted along the east and west sides of Airport Road, the north and south side of Golden Gate Parkway, and the west side of Livingston Road, and on all tracts within the Grey Oaks MPUD limits subject to the following conditions: (Revised 4/11/07) 40 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1605 Project signs shall not exceed a height of twenty (20) feet above the finished ground level of the sign site nor shall the overall area of the sign face exceed one hundred (100) square feet. A maximum of fourteen (14) project signs shall be permitted. Six (6) located along Airport Road frontage, four (4) each located along Golden Gate Parkway and Livingston Road frontage. The location of such signs shall generally be limited to a one-quarter mile spacing requirement unless existing vegetation requires a closer spacing. An additional 5 intersection signs shall be permitted at the intersections of Golden Gate Parkway with Airport Road and Livingston Road. iii. Project signs may be lighted provided all lights are shielded. 7.08 ENGINEERING 1) Detailed paving, grading, site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by Engineering Review Services. 2) Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County Ordinances regulating subdivisions, unless otherwise approved as an exception to said regulations during subdivision approval. 3) Platting shall be accomplished when required by Collier County Ordinances regulating subdivisions. 4) Work within Collier County right-of-way shall meet the requirements of the applicable County ordinance. 5) Internal access into tracts as shown on the MPUD Master Plan is informational only. Exact locations shall be determined during subdivision or site development plan approval. 7.09 EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVSION REGULATIONS Exceptions to subdivision regulations shall be requested at the time of application for subdivision approval in accordance with applicable subdivision regulations in effect at the time of development. 7.10 SCHOOL DISTRICT (Revised 4/91/07) 41 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1606 The applicant shall dedicate a fifteen (15) acre school site to the Collier County School District at a location (off-site) agreed upon between the developer and the School District. 7.11 FIRE STATION/EMS SITE The developer has conveyed a 1.5 acre site for use by the North Naples and the East Naples Fire Districts, together with Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department. The site was conveyed in fee simple, subject to the following conditions: 1) The site shall revert to the owner, or subsequent owner, if it is not utilized for a fire and rescue facility for at least five (5) years. 2) If either fire district or the Emergency Medical Services Department adopts impact fees the developer shall be entitled to impact fee credit for the dedicated site based on the fair market value on the date of dedication. 7.12 AFFORDABLE HOUSING Naples Grande Holdings, LLC shall commit to providing $1,000 per approved residential dwelling unit located within property controlled by Naples Grande Holdings, LLC. Payment shall be made to the Collier County Affordable Housing Trust Fund at the time issuance of the certificate of occupancy. This $1,000 shall be credited toward any additional affordable housing linkage fees that may be in effect at the time of site development plan approval. 7.13 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT The developer, its successors in interest, and all future assigns or designees, shall adhere to all commitments made in the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Application for Development Approvals (ADA), sufficiency responses, and attachments for this amendment and all previously adopted DRI Development Order (DO) actions for this project. (Revised 4/11/07) 42 9.D.7 Packet Pg. 1607 9.D.7 T" PUDA-200h-AR-10157 REV: 1 Prujec:t: 19990283 Date: 7/24i'2006 nt I T: - u;,,, IQApLe'15S GNAW 179 E mm T GONGiP1 UAL t•AND P AN 0 100 400 No :VlISt?:TlY1(i'l6'; fJj �1��; 0 21 Packet Pg. 1608 Ilsom (%!d. M eC11 mlww Ww1�1�R M![i n YL rswe .t nl�a r V® ams � � wm�ru� vn.s �»�w •ir N anwwcac u win-�nar�ern MIA 4..... a we�� - cru u•s r w�r..��r ■ ��....m .rw Mao p -► ren ai ro ww* en 'y air ■ r wm em u wtn wts �sr � acm ary 1ffiJiiQ muLaLL •rrenrt wr C -m awrtou uia ii ewts wast �rr'in v wr r,�r�r cr.rnw. carawn.w u•ao v� �aw w.sa Fm 48 i �1 0 Packet Pg. 1609