The URL can be used to link to this page

Backup Documents 09/25-26/2012 Item # 7 1,c)■ -V S - AIL: CA-c rrekrs cl17- -t ►z September 24, 20012 C Over the past year, and even longer Collier County has been considering beach nourishment projects for its actively migrating coast line. A number of dredge and nourish options had been considered simultaneously and now a choice has been made, by the Costal Management Department (CM) Staff and their engineering consultant Costal Planning and Engineering (CPE) to advance for consideration by the Collier County Commission. Using the previous 2005-06 nourishment project template CM and CPE are proposing a similar operation. This similar project calls for placement of additional sand gulfward of the '05-`06 template under the pretext of "advanced nourishment" and requests permission to operate six weeks before the November first end of turtle nesting season and four weeks into the beginning of the "official" turtle nesting season which starts May 1. CM and CPE claim the extended time frame is needed in order to provide scheduling flexibility for the project. This even after a massive reduction in size and scope of a grander more time demanding "10 year" project included in earlier considerations as a major option has been withdrawn. It appears this flexibility is tied to hopes of blending the collier project with others in Lee Co, Captiva or Sarasota County, Long Boat Key or both. Apparently accommodating the nesting turtles of Sarasota Co. long boat Key and leaving our ecological trust to suffer nesting season encroachments. The plan presented to you today by Mr. McAlpin and Mr. Keene has been developed after a long term analysis of beach characteristics and behavior but considers only the dredge option for completing the larger ' '' CR task. Moving sand from the bottom of the Gulf, some thirty three miles away to off our shores where it is pumped again into submerged pipes to the shore to be distributed along the our coast thru more pipes on the beach. My interest in the beach nourishment project is that of a local citizen of thirty three years who is not bothered by being known as an environmentalist but who also strives to mitigate my environmental views by striving to contribute to the Design of options that accommodate the goals of protecting property, providing beaches for the residents and hoteliers and protecting our natural resources through a strategy of managed abundance. In other words hands off endangered species until they recover and then we can all enjoy a little turtle soup. Turtles are an indicator species showing the health of our seas and in my opinion should and can be managed to abundance this means avoiding their molestation in all ways practicable. Today I want to briefly show you a method of beach nourishment that can be used to accomplish all the aforementioned goals in a timely economic fashion with reduced interference to beach goers and with flexibility unmatched by dredging operations. Bob Krasowski Naples Fl. 239-434-0786 9/24/2012 Pik 7 c -C'„ Collier County Inland Sand Source Truck Haul Option Economics • Provides flexibility with choice of where and when to • Bed tax dollars pass through local economy nourish. • Hot spots,public beaches and hotels are all accessible via • Estimate$11 to$15 million dollars or less for existing beach access points. • Choice on where to nourish can be made day before setup, the entire project. and adjusted according to priorities. • Dollar multiplier X1.5=$27 to$37million • Ability to avoid remaining turtle nest in October if needed. • Nourishes the beaches in more environmentally friendly dollars into local economy. fashion. • Use Local or Regional Sand Source. • No pipes spanning beaches in nesting or tourist season • Allows for sand application over a broader period of time • Sand Distribution and placement on beach stating as soon as permits are received and pausing if neccisary fornestingseason. • Local Design and Engineering of project. Economics continued Recomendations • We are already planning to use truck sand at • Engage Development Services Advisory Committee in two locations. • analyzing local option. • Use engineer other than Costal Planning and • 25,000 CY @$650,000=$26 per CU Engineering to put the local proposal together. • Send RFP out for only local or both local and dredge • 1 CU=1.35 tons proposal. • 25,00 CU=33,750 tons • Keep projects separate till bids are open.Big Benefit. • Put Marsha Cravens on DSAB to help bring them get up • $650,000/33,750 tons=$19.25 a ton to speed. • Price will probably drop with economies of • Costal management staff should present to the DSAB once or twice at DSAB discretion and then stay focused scale on dredge option. More • Work an arrangement with sand source(s)to set aside sand over the course of normal operations so the work can be scheduled over the course of their regular work schedule so as to reduce the cost of erratic scheduling that takes place when a large order comes in and demands a hyper response to fill. 1 /ZS /t2 ST(IN) c oNotV 5 1( l tern On 3 Aug 99 at the BCC meeting, Item 10 E... the BCC voted to challenge the new FEMA maps. In January 2001, Abe Skinner (bless his soul) for some reason, had a LiDAR topography done of Collier County along with his usual yearly aerial photos. The LiDAR wasn't available until after June 2001 and we didn't learn about it for a few months after that. That's when we started comparing it to the new Flood Insurance Rate maps. The LiDAR showed that the new flood maps were grossly inaccurate... especially for Golden Gate and Naples Park. The original FEMA maps were based on a couple of local aerial topographies and the USGS maps which were a 5 foot contour interval. 31 Jul 01, the BCC passed Resolution 2001-312 rejecting FEMA's proposed map changes. FEMA was absorbed into DHS effective March 1, 2003. The folks we were dealing with had their e-mail addresses changed from @fema.gov to @dhs.gov. On about September 2002 Collier County staff and others (Commissioner Coletta, Joe Schmitt, Dick Tomasello, Patrick White, Bob Devlin, Ken Pineau and I) met with FEMA in Atlanta and showed them the Appraiser's LiDAR superimposed on their maps. At that meeting, FEMA agreed to keep Golden Gate as a D zone and to implement the rest of the maps until Dick Tomasello had finished his restudy of Golden Gate and the Coastal surge. Golden Gate was known as the sheet 2D study. 25 March 2003... the BCC approved a contract agreement with FDEP for densification of the NGS NAVD benchmark network in eastern Collier County to facilitate the vertical surveying of flood elevation certificates. 23 Sep 2003, the BCC approved a single-vendor contract with 3001 (the LiDAR contractor) to certify their LiDAR for use in the FEMA flood zone restudy. 9/4 Z Then we started the process of obtaining LiDAR for the eastern developed County out to SR 29 from USACOE. The LiDARs were found to have an accuracy of within 2 ft, which was all that was required. For the next few years many requests for new LiDAR were made by Engineering and by the EAC, who requires LiDAR of new projects at each meeting. In 2008 a new LiDAR was finally flown and we received it in early 2010 and began working with it, In about June 2010, just as Jack McKenna was coming on-board, Tim Billings and I noticed that there was a consistent elevation difference between the two LiDARs and that the new LiDAR showed elevations that were approximately a foot higher than the original. Jack confirmed that and it was also confirmed within a few weeks by SFWMD. Since none of us old-timers took GIS in school, Jack, Tim, Me and the surveyor, Steve Higgins figured out a way to see which LiDAR was correct graphically... we shot the elevation of intersection centers all over the developed county. This led the BCC to fund a restudy of two basins out of 10 that showed there would be an impact by using the new LiDAR So now we have two worlds... Collier real world, and FEMA world... which is a parallel universe a foot lower than Collier real world. All the studies and all the maps are done in FEMA world, but all the surveying for LOMA's is done in Collier real world, which is a foot higher and gives a 1 ft advantage. FEMA has known about this for over 2 years. -T -W • . ' .... *it 8 • • 0 , , w)A - ` S . rn Or C' t. Ct C. ' ril ..A q1 `{, ik q 1�1, ° A , Si S --i. 0 0,- C A 4 >1 • c ' L o s a t / .1'- + ° Cil 4 4)\ ... 0.- . 1 .... ----- . a a - 1 c A, k A )c a < 3 � R I. 3` (;■A ms m, '� 0 p -1--,' 3 --\3 - (- ; il 7 a , , (r) VA\ : t.-`1 14. I ,-----, .... ,,, _4(r-/ /4 IP i R pi. ' 4 tA , A . . 'V v COLLIER CO. DFIRM ZONES 2012 RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES E OF 951 Legend i I - Q RURAL ESTATES E OF 951 V ,I { X500 ZONE 2012 GG 2 X ZONE 2012 GG IIIII AH_ZONE_2012 GG AE_ZONE_2012 GG 1--- a x\ -.. . __] ' ---..--E--- si71 � (..4/1111 - soil■ I .__ \ jL .___ ► - -- - 71, KiiiiiiMI NEN Bin 111:20 :41m = Iii___ .... � e t - �G ...0„ it ) -1 IIII.p .__IJto _ ' �• vi....... J —1 .<______ i F v-- ACRES 53405 100% 4613 9% X 500 GGEACA 7701 14% X 39938 75% AH Golden Gate o Area Civic Asssoc.c. PO Box 9905% 1153 2°/ AE Naples,FL 34116 Z 1114 ' ° www.estates-civic.org 5,, , eYIV41/V Sri RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES- EAST OF 951 DFIRM ACRES % CLASS 53405 100% TOTAL AREA 4613 9% X 500 7701 14% X 39938 75% AH 1153 2% AE • GENERAL FEMA INTERPETATION: NO MITIGATION OR COMPENSATION IN VE,AE,AH AREAS • TO BUILD ON A FILL PAD- MUST COMPENSATE FOR VOLUME LOSS o ONLY ALLOWED IN X/X500 ZONE BELOW 100 YEAR BASE FLOOD ELEVATION TO HIGHEST GROUND WATER ELEVATION • ONLY WAY TO COMPENSATE IS TO DIG IN X/X500 ZONE • IN RURAL ESTATES IF NO COMPENSATION ALLOWED ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS—NO CONSTRUCTION ALLOWED • IF A BUILDING PERMIT HAS NOT BEEN ISSUED PRIOR TO MAY 16, 2012,THEN HAVE TO COMPLY WITH NEW RULES. • EXISTING STRUCTURE IN AE, AH ZONE: IF IMPROVEMENTS COST MORE THAN 50%OF CURRENT VALUE THEN HAVE TO MEET NEW—BASE FLOOD ELEVATION RESTRICTIONS. • APPEARS TO BE COUNTY WIDE ISSUE RECOMMENDATION: ENLIST AID OF LANDOWNERS AND PROFESSIONALS IN COMMUNITY TO DEVISE WAYS OF: • NEED AS MANY"IDEAS"AS POSSIBLE, • PURSUE DE MINNIMUS CONSIDERATION • COMPENSATION—MITIGATION OPTIONS rrr //25 /2 COLLIER CO. DFIRM ZONES 2012 2007 IMMOKALEE FUTURE LAND USE MAP so it flip , I ! i ; r In T . L__ A g • I M._a � . i • 1. ' , I t - , �� - �� fir n'Aili_. '1•11*„.. i' .; ---4 .... .., 1' riC it - L �. i S T iz + • 1 Legend '' i . E I i Q 2007 FLU ZONES IMMOKALEE - - . l i pli IMMOKALEE URBAN AREA QIMM BNDY 16764-TOTAL ACRES A ZON E_2012 ZONE ACRES % AE ZONE 2012 A 344.98 2% AHZONE_2012 AE 2448.89 14% AH 11658.43 69% X ZONE 2012 X 1310.76 8% X500 1123.16 7% X500 ZONE 2012 GGEACA Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Assoc. PO Box 990596 . Ni Naples,FL 34116 3 www.estates-civic.org ' . „... rliziltt-. 0 _ I 1 , M1111 aril ,..6A.i.--_ :,--,i-- ....: ...• .... , .,.r.,.....,,,,,,,- -,-. - ' , _.---„ 1 ,, - —01-,..„_aiwista. ---..,-., .,,, , ' 111112r cc : Irl, *- -- z ...1 1 (oil _I z :,,, .:._. _ .4 ,.. ' ° § iktc• ' 0 fr I.? . 1- .,)‘ ‘.; . ..', rt' , _.,, .1.,V, ‘..,.., '• °.-7.'-'-. rrIL - --,-,--:.-" .iigs:4..; : : .-- . ' . . :.-' : .- -0 ILI I—I A i-,--'-.Ht, ' \v`r`v-----. '-'1.:0, z - '... .",- .• _:- Era - '•''' .- -ILT .. .... s::: : , : - ,, ,, • c u) 0 *,-, . ,.-1.;:,;',4 tr.,., 0 .„._', ...='-'” Y.,,i.„.. aii .,.:- :;,'-..',. ....„:,_.w..:7... ...-', _' • . . , T----.7';...-........z. :. --. - .. . •- ---- w 1 ,,.',41 •..7_11 rr.i.:. .....::rLr ..:. rz. ... . 11',64"'''t . '-'' P'" A --,'. - - - -''- ,- -- - '- - — -2-- " '• a) 011::-- , r/Writi2_,];_ _OP.1 ., !AI Ir47.,--i,.E--=..--.....2--f-.7:-,,..-•t-:-.--,-,r.---.:, . -- .--.,..,. , _. ., ,....,,.. -I I , 4":0F141.1t. —Npc, !Flit:,:-. ..- -.4-. 1 _k,'f.,_:-• .:,:..„:- •--•.?, ::,.ii....:_.,...L __., ...,-,,_ ::., _ , ., ...- ,. ,. .. • ;=) — Nr ... .--,-.,------t,,.2%, -4.-..t.- . .,... --. _ .•‘ r•:- , vv.:.- .., ...a. Mt .. . ri.'„..z. -_ .. ..-..,-, -: !--,,,,if::-...:..,',,..-- - .., ,- - ----"... =.._ . CV _ a I , I ' ' 6 • 10.. . .. ... --------- ',..2., ., „,, . ,.° - : • -,- - . i,. .-.,- ,.,„.,.... ..-.., . . . , . .:-.1..:„;:t.■.1111 ... - - c• .4,k,'•_::::1,; 0 TD• N 1 _ 191. iij +V CN LI- 741:: ,4 P°117 1111117 . .- - 07 &••• P. P.17: ,,,1, _. 1 kt.--.•Irt ... -- .4, . . ■ill 'ial■al 4 imma..lasi 7 c... D II ,,,,,_,,,,:c42, . e„.ftt...: '., co - 1111 !ell: Ill. . 0 r, . ap _ .1 g i. ','.'.'::.47:1,-f*.;:'.- 7,--"'-'•-.,tY'"t,... :-. ::"=`'=-1-14tip'-'4”.I- -. ellmi I , . .. — ......„..,0,,,:.•>,.....,...„................„,„.„, ,,•,..„,....:...„...... ,,:,.. • ,.. .. -/-;•.... .i.o.-1,k.„,:.*„;:,-4.4.•.,::::1„..ii, -;:::14,..,*.e.:„. • R. • . • _ 74. ,,,,_,, .i_i,t. ,-,,,,',17.,.44g.,,:,:....7.Z2!..:41-'.4,'-li5e.-:"ik:,,,i0:4,-, • „ . . . 111.1111 ... isimia - .4•2--.:,,,r ,.:Itzt;iiii,:•;..„.4. ..3.1.4.ti,i,„:„.,..1,„,k . 4 • ..„ .. ..:4-...,,,..-. ,,k:LI, ,:,‘...N,„.. . .,-,kv;a A-g„,:, m TEMITI. -.'.--''''- ''':''':- ''....`,k-,'-a-V?I'r.tr.'-'''''';'%iP..7.,:,....--.1 . . ... ,',..1z,'...•,,, • a...qi a N - 11•11•1111.0111111• r-• SAD-'-` 1-•,k-r iii2..'r'""' ' 11111 1 ' {..::..: ''':"■?''''.':;:171keii'',-'''.-. MI. 111.4" 11111111111 , ■ , ''''',''''E',.:.:'''IltiZ,g.. t _, .': '. `.!...--i.:.-.'=:',;7,,;,. :.,.•.,,-tt2-':-...",' ,ANNIMI:.- s..0.7-••-• :,-:;;;.,-.-.,' '-;-•._ ...',-','.`--,.-',N--3....;;•;:,,,......-.,,,,' ..„:7-71.' .h..4,,t'-,.--oar....x.-lau!': iii . ...PMErrIlliilling •-I CiVP - -t. ' rim . • e.,_,.:. ..,....s 1"..n -C,::,:71.- .h.-- — -02.--..-,...„..,;_. ..!...r. .. , Fr r ...7„1?-71.np7,gt-, . 74_...- a,_./,..,-1,4-vr....2....c. . 'Akiim'rgill,'2 ' -di "i'','. ---,-S-.:.014'1;" ':,i:..:,,-:::•:::k "146;--‘VI I-k,.,,S1-'11 . - 'Et=mi■\ --_-_4,..,. 7.,i-,- --.. _, -'..),---,,, --tr. -- ' ' *;01:.: ''''' ----.7,1::: -a.=II - te. • ' .,,n.2 .„ , ..-....... ' --.,-.,-13-,,A, =-.1 Illr . - - i■ i■ '.. 'S).`.--iT'e:' 4.--c--.= :.... ,-;3..•,-T, - ,,v-r Aidili.,--,,..b= sw....„-T, ...-= .....' ::-.7-1--'-- -. 11/f al■ L.,..-.--:,:lt ,--,...-.?r._:5, -,,,,p,--,,,c • 1.141,. ...,,,2,,,i. ....._.-.. . .-vto isimiri ,,e2 Lr,....,_ _. it5, 1.,`'a k•,-/ 11 1. ci .. •--.-,,,,,..1 t .. , W.;.-, 1.1111. 47-CIE:'','.':,: i.,41. . C.) (..) ..• '. -V''.1-'' '' '-: '"‘ . :.-.. . og.r" Ijogairg:._‘.,.7---:,-t-m ;„—. .0.4.; • i ,!&,.....„.21._„,•Ail-; ---.1 :-,,,A; ' 'q;:=.1:,11,!::%tig,a.i.-a4' ..r-,-,c: a t Etwmi-• :-Ito , 1.1..-., ..--:---. p...?.... . --=-----r Ik.:-.:, '..s.*:-.7.----7;3°••••01 ri'7,.. ... '4_10".;'... f'pc -,-.°_').'"ye_',7-',.,-jtal4' 2-7,-..voz,S. , '' • ii., . gring.7.17.-A14.7?-ont,_.e.:H4gEil CO '...,,, ',-77,-;:-.---7.-- 1°14!k. .C. . „:I 1-.--....-a.=-•_.r.,...", —sky-'-'2.-'■ ---"-`. '... --% 1-..; . 6 ,a. , j,i1. 2.1._JI ....*,•1 ileriwifr.,,Arr.6. 1-• 4;6--'I:L'....',...-f.-.,-;,,,t -1.?' . ...; ,-,-... ,1-r.r, -.- , iie2rmem.,„ ,,, . 1.1.1.1,,,i,:rits,. -a 171) _co ---=:-=,--------0,.-;.:--t-i-t,''i `-- i.il. ' .....,7-,7-77 7. ::...,..c- -• •I ‘:toki ,1,. ,..4--- A = a) — of;,:,:,-- , 1 W' ,,,..... mi ,.. , _ ,... ,_:.,..,;L.: ,,- _ ; .pAcalL,11),Lii ,•,....,••,-,.. ..,....,"'"Z-'1,'..1,rk. .N110 Old -% 19.111i1.,L g,!... I . ;. ■-.11i4.'..)': .I,.7:17A-11.1 .710.-Ititiliri; ,-.7 . d---i--=',7, ' ort, S.`••71y1`1■:?,..9111F, 111111rie •MI -TiVii."Cf.), . ; --...:Nillot1 en. "I'D :71 .-:-f';'iq m --=....-- L --._ •--- 45-47`,..,„, -•/ -..-1,,_--,--4.)11.-, :..L.,_:-2-....-'..V.r.....',;(.:t.'....-'•-..v 1,1„--anriv: =-7 _ CS& - \, " .s.:)..c5. ctligt!.j...,L,:lc i tiii F .11 4.5 Ir*7-.fr.:7-,'.-11.'..4*:A'!-4'........1-45'.. -..'s' . .. V.'-':117,LI6.-1.:1•'-Ate.0114•■■• --rip-- ' A . . ,_ „.. ..,,,..,...4„,..,..._:..‹..... . .1,. ce co al,'• '41g.t-. .-:,::.6.k-,,Is:..,,,,,-",,,, '''''.:,.---;"-' Cr -- 1.'ji ---.‘bi'l 1.,-ago AV " , .8"-I.;:,.• •ii,iii-T- ,'.. .;; i.1:- rQ",11,-7-,19.7h,..1115-1:1•1:.''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''' rjw{,... '41i'lig . ,,•,' ,'".*:-ei.L.11=..... -to n• . ,,, ikapt. ;;;Iatw-..,.... ...,.-,...,--77. t- 6-;IK -P.''•.'''-'-iii4.4=-1 -1.4aime --,-.-= -1!.' -...4'_:-,,,T.o.,r,,. - Tos.:7,14,. 1......s-1.''.....:,.......,-...-•--.- I .A,47,16-:47.p.'..q..:1-i---i.k'--,-.74,":-.1,...-- -..,,,,,- . ;;:cli:Thuialti. liokEe- ..,..vikei griuriplitlitt 41-04.011,. 001.0,..v...-, , .. . Q .,,.___.,...---. '..c,-,...,-.1,,'.77-7-, ---.:::4415--- -.'-.;.-.''''.;'_,,-",r7-.,.:'.7--=. ,"'" .i'rilili,t‘,P,VI,10,4 . -.".• -1911115M11, . 0 - >'...-''''' ' ''' '''' -:- ''''''''. - Cc' r" .: 14,- t'L ■iiiii1N111111iPziPl• W . ;i:j:.r',-... :..,,,Q.--.,.... .....-°/,, -:, ',T1,111j-%!.. '.'f°N • 'Lk.-- ,'" - .. :---,N.:--,,•;...1-!1.t. ,- , -.-.,t.i,, s,tt ,,,,_ t:-.,--`::'''' • ° ' . N i.viGinon 32:10HS lino . li 11,1.. • • lk — — — ".. ..12g.,. 4-1'`, ' =, -- i-.1 -- -- t, a) o 0 , .. ,-, . :._.;-*- - ... (9 ' -',' :,,-,-, - r-- •._ 1 3,..'S pe." Ile (//� L UNITED STATES 1, CORKSCREW SE QUADRANGLE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Y FLORIDA-COLDER CO. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 7.5 MINUTE SERIES(TOPOGRAPHIC) '377 .pL IW �W A' •pBPE aurna e.NE � • sea ore FEET E... COIf83GRRW' $WWiP-99LF� 22 p_' 23 I 1$.L..- - N '�-\ _ _ . ---.."--.2-■ trillillif - iia� — — _ r±+\{ of \ ,I=-: I P• e_ ill"= 30 29 28 ,-----,------r-• ---.=--A"---:''1E7=-: 1 _ \ \ ;-,, jite 1 ____________] , — I 11• — -: olpth l J 4. I ' 1I' 1 _ , 1." 4 . -wm 4. 1 iv _ , ,. . _ , ih, _____ __, _____ _ ___ . ...._ _,........7.______,,________,_____:,:,,__ _ , ,.,, + , , , , T._.TEz--_:_--1,---5.77.---;--__-_-.:-..=.7-- ------7 .:---_-_,-_,---::::.-_---,--1.---,--:--------7.--_--_-,:r 3 r, ,_.,..-_- Iffie„, i e a ,. Ii I'▪Ar- _ __ • R �f''''.g C R_ E_ W - - e : - --- II,' 11 1 t--- -.In 9 • ' 'I to lir-:_____ t i I ■ I .4 -_I i - - - _ -- --- `----- — _ _ -—-- .. __ I , I _, _ — J . 24 , 2Q 21 22 1 - - - _ ,■ L. � _�� - — : �..�_ � - 3-- (�. _ ■ s t _ Ij -4 _ u Y N. \ I _3 -'36 $ - .i __ 32'__ Q �.-.1 _ _.— __ —_.�R I. Ty - i l30^ '>e MOM Fen r Y1 35, V aE, - 3Y3d V1 -•.•• R..27 E eeexeE ue24(NO Mapped,edited,and published by the Geological Survey SCALE 124000 •or q USOS and USCA05 a Cone and 0,alnan Im pert xomoxed from se.ial vxoldaraau a�? l'-'. m ROAD CUSSwnt1Oet o ram zm 3m .om �s uaen 195,-1952.Touowavxl M purculde surveys 1058 r •.•^ �—' r Rd's,:pojenn'on. on mmn loll -,`a _ s _ o mr[rte -umdtdy-.® LIM,*_---- 10.006 'd utltw Florida rnordlnak em a -1.1,11 CONTOUR INTERVAL SEA 5 FEET ��-+1 UrrimPOM of shown in blue sal imm�m Maram•gr,d o'a�z,well, a wrvx IS MEAN SEA aavae ss"nm\s13,yS\!\f) S.Route n bntll mr.ryM in T.al3.J1.2]Eam Dotted Una rIns WAIN,by private suety eeeldn.,mx..ee.rTa o.Nraa. 1H° 5 NT u,s a yM 2,12 CORKSCREW SE,FLA.KIR vwavxs -'M'T ,RC WR�MM.IS O N2615-wB130/ls wren 1913 ThU inform uonvnot meld eFeesed n wrap REQUEST 1958 PSIOTOREVISE0 1973 ANN SONS I SPAINNSILS MT UNITED STATES Gil BELLE MEADE NE QUADRANGLE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 1 7' FLORIDA COLLIER CO. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY / es es NI 35' 1E2 31 f b MINUTE S(TOPOGRAP 3t-.-0,--",-,-. FFFF 3 s` g 1 . - �. - { F -. -'* 1 x 0,.'' �`, y I'_ { i _ Ili - t } } --t;;1:--;-_--_iri-:-_ j-i-,_--1,_=_ _:::::-_,.-1-k_.-_ti-,...:--;',-_.i ,-..-- -7.-1,-.--z---;I _-_.! - --.-:---I:------,.-::_-__=:='_::- -----..--- ..------- - =-,-- 4; -.=_;:.--::--_;-_-:_--,:,_t:-,:-.:--.:-_2-c_o_ t i f. '' - _ = _:t_ - i �1 -': = : =r n< _ _ � - _ _ - -:-..i _ _ �1 r, :, _z _ - _ _ - - c - _ _ - - - - --' _ -_ _ _ _ - 1 _ - '• -j - - _ _ - •' _ - -�_ _ _sz s 3 - _ - _ _ . lr - _ i _ f r. . _ A I - __ _ _r. --e =, i. �-- ]aDE. R, Napped,added,and published by the GeDlagiwl Serves SCALE L24000 ;am el q USGS ana uSC6GS :IT _ - ... _. i xG ROAD cussiUGTIDN ne 'al 0nou6a0ns wog 0 - Am - -- cmo- -nm era ryd b ghr ry - 0we Rh q u 1958 �t� -- -.ea H - U du W]-b esdl �y Mero pW ucks. none -y ru,pxn.eEaMrK stAneu OrTUx a 19x9 -.- ; Unsnp 1 JiR- a qna o nnFlCmN reaamnah system.asl -- �i SrzN RaNe DDDt'fn ^Nue ., c00 enc-An9s-R.zeca.naR.50S-R.28E BELLE MEADE NE,FLA. ei q onn;e sung o,er�x.nox ar erxrry ar sxecr aww.xs. Tana omens rDR swtF BY u. eoroRAOO eons m 9ace�m nv peaK�ea xonn.m.,�e pnvm.9ea, MORI 1351T 0xe �i�+�fy a]melea x.th ae 1958 alien t9]3 This mramauon not helC checked Rn ♦r0U[R 065flllNxG i09DGRUxic NARG AND srNe0t9 6 avuuey[Ox R[au[si t0 mNen q Nslv1 rmv uctr OR RESTON VIRGINIA 22092 UNITED STATES (s(iV BELLE MEADE NW QUADRANGLE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR '. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY /)j/J FLORIDA COLLIER CO nay 1.0=4 '._,R . s apy. �I. hswr`°•tee aaw` /---aaall�LJJ°°°aaA("'! `/ - SERIES(TOPOGRAPHIC) . 91 xcorz cw awa ay ° 5 26' of I �, t� - 1 Ii' pia 4 = • • i 11 1 3 2 • i 1 ,_ •. ___—.;__—,4 - — ---I —11-1 ttt • •I I:12 •f 4 1' I r' 1 j 1 J n •. i, • i• 11—• = 17 a 16 i'--�°•'-19--'—':' . .. -13 I ii y . ' e — ° F L . i ' LL _ i J I • • � ; . . 24 •Y [ --HL I i, { i _4- i L- •. : i4 30 t .••••••::��I l_ 2Y �© i 25 0 _ _ I n r 1 • ` ✓ 33 ,. _• 31.; ®•r { 32_ �� 33= O3 $ ., _ V 36 �, ___'_-- 3 - __ _�. 6 .� to �~-- - I I L ;, rC - - - - - ear.,.. _ - - -- '- -- v ,..._.,iiir : I. 4 L — ,r l� 1 o°oo n0 Il Q_ • •- .. .� 6 ... - HV O/ E L'J 'In, O c 12 O D - 1• - V!� • •F " * —44 Noose e a <z,� SRE2e.nr" R 17 ad r p 2e E p.2 . .=e...-..�..e....�.•w�.. p,I; Mapal ty SGS a and published by the GeolOgi[01 Survey s® �.2a 000 r,O ROAD CLASSIFICATION �C SCALE Ca' USOL.GS n RTOmpapp ay oUnraebw preys I95p ®- :nu Primary hiphray L proved urea.NUJ w Non No, anN, con,NNE MN surface improved surface Royna.a om�ecsen. I , Mad ool axe^'ea,„N�m p a uMS. 1 zone 9m wsaz zx¢s RATIONAL MwEnc vExrcn DARN OF 1927 ersta Y�_Unimproved n " um le Route U State Rout ROINIS' mn�l�snxan naq� e De Nllres esv neREbn T.c95.R.2r E. raAwz. room.e pewee North Amuiran 0atomlvAS aa,ae awe rnmu,aY> aanewcem��„ EMS asII erpurvs esu 01°"`N°f10Ler BELLE MEADE�W,FLA.MAP AMUR..VERMIN paQe�v.a a>merNa�,vh a�a FOR SALE on GEOLOGICAL 26081 IBNMea NW as show:by clashed carer swiss w.s I�Nn azrai p-aloe aMs 4ieen 19tl. a wlDEx 45ou0M.iWGnMxt Nn5 AND SYMBOLS 6 AVAILABLE 0 and NW sources IlEs information not field cneckea u N REQUEST map ewpe zmedited mEioles ealmswn of uNan meal ems was n Ns sm.vest 1111=11, rilinv of 61/211 L _ .1,.. • 1 ' L- . .c, . • r__ _._,. t I • . . • • . • _ • !m • t-',--,=-;- ‘,. '' • • t . ' . • it k • . ..-, . . • - . .— . .- • 0., .- . . : • . • • i • . 1 • • • i : • 'i • . . • ,......,-....,_- i • -1, • • : • - • • I : ii . • , • 1 .• ._ . . • • .f. • I-- • :1 • • 1 1 • • . -_.--_. , • • ..c.-;!.. • ? : j . .. .. ! • 1 : . • . i . .., • • d•!..041 . , . . . • • i , • • ' 1 i 1 • I . =,-,.... ----- -- -f- .._ • . .1 . . ! ,1 . . • i - 1 • ....____ . 1 ialli■ ---- -- -- til —..•-----.-,----- -.-- ---- -- MI ---' - '-- --- -- ---— '71 , . ''---.. . ---7:-,.... ...=-=....,.... ...-..-- ,_. tfW Liii _, •-9..■ gm.. 'a';'I i il III il • 7-1" •••, —_ I i 14 • I,. .) L c;zb. c?' ......_ ...____._________ ____ , • 169Irs cis.,ii.:-r.k•_:;:.-37,.75-,.. . ',;.,•',:',L,','-„E-.:1,:;;Y.z. f.!_,. -,7:',''''' ',J;',,':!,-,;;:". E.' 1...- • cm ......•••• •••_ji: . ....•MNI•ImilM% 4,,.. ______,57.1. __._.,,__ ;_ _:,,..,. .1. :?1.1.t.ziat,.*_•;,.,v-.,,,d,,--..ift,140. _ A----t----.---.--.-At .• • • • ..h• . 0 1, a..., ,::,,,.„...-,:: :,,.,1,41 • •-:,,,,,,v,.:,:„.,.-z.-_ ,z•:,,,,c.:.„...,_,__. z_.:v,„ :I; 'h. . ...I!, __ • .i • ____r_—,, •1:• 1 7,-,...-,E.„,,,,,,,„,,._..:r.. .„,,...:_„..K:.. .-..,.......,...,...,_,.... ., .„_,.„..•:::::•,_,k,„ .,„!$-A-3 t. (itio 4. :1 1 :,•r: 1 ii• •I:. - • •______V •., , -?.7P. --it-sz--•ii-•!,Ati-.:--t ii•:.,su..,..--;.,.•isP,-,,,:,-.:.2.,,,.. ..-•,:•-,--. .40.-•-••ex,-..y ,-,f4-..,..,---„,,,,y - 1 I .'=•==--.','•;42.-"-;:-- -.:.:-i;•-•'e, ;;;7:- - .-;.i,.1---. --.1'. ,'..--.:';-..X r. ..',...1.:-Y:..te.::"-4-. •••••• L.,,, ,...„.)1 i :I' ..1• 't •I' :• „!, . ' . _V.1-0''t:?.. .i,:-_'..f:,,ii- 14 Vit -4:'W: --&ff":-irl t•_!•.' 6 t; ••-• 1,4 ....._- -'1 75% tt-v--- ••••■ •1, •ri • " • •P.,, :o. 111 1 ,.7.-::.--,, ,,":-',.i!,4";:::-:i;t4 .j,,-0,.::74.:41i.,, 1 iii-i.'i'-:"!-.,A-';g"1.1!--ii:-..,, ' ;71: (-1 I 1..., •i.• • I • •• • •ri .4 •.",---.-:• 7r-•• --'• .[ ! ..-;..7`,..-il,:==.,:0'., ''''.A, - 41S..'A.,.1:.-'210 1, ' '';,,i. 7"-.--.--) fta .:t •'i• . •'".-.,-.-7.,.77.''-,7)' ,,., .c'f•,...11it .,:_:., t1 •■t '', ., ••• •,I_ 1: 1; -I-,-.:,.:2-4-,--_,L----.: .,:---;...4\-,;-: -;-A.7,3.---,-.,,f,----:-.-,',..N-?..- --;;;-9,,,..-i-i-a--t2;--•-- -_-----'if:- --__,--_.1 Cal •41,ft % ••L4 ;.--•1',.. P. ',..•),1 I 10 • IP ,! ._=----_---,---! .-.---;.::-- f.'S‘..A1.-•-.,- - --'.--- -=.'.-=;,;:-..; .----•:.=4, ,-,. i A-',-:----- /.---- • •,. l-_,I 144::::,:i.--W-.'4,V,:l.::--Z-.--: :-'4„..;-----*-:,t:t,--_,‘:.=:---;R::---kiMill'4-Fr.;':-2i,..1-4a,:.,:_.i';:f-,; i' \ . . st • .......---.7.1 • . •li i ''. ..1'.1.-S.1.....!:;„:.'1.:,1:.i.;:-.',-;27..t 1,-7.1:7rj..Y,'. . .. I.• k-.13ZL.N.., ,... ,., ,.. ..."...n .•_.,,(----- •.a a a•1__ . ,. • ,..,,,,, I c . 1 4- li• ;I•:- .1 *:-i-,,,,--..".:La,,, '\-461,,-,-;!.:1,.:•;,,,,,-;...,:ii,,,,,7:::-..,-.-: 1-.,.7- -...1,,,.:1--... I.:•, „ \'•- \*.' \ s'•:'.-—I• ..:' .; •I' 1 ,„,...,:•:•-,A-.----v•,,4:vckz:.-.-..w..?.=-.,•.,..-.4,- --..;,=,..,--„--,-4,-:...,,:,2,;-•-:;;;;-'.;, !---Y-=-,-.--•7-., -• •il•:,01.._' •!=------. • .-• •-• 1 ......••••,--\\• 14. k• ,... ii ...S.,..;i.- '-i..:2,.;'•-:',:-.i,','....-- -7.7:4-• •:`,-.:.:-.1 -.;,:,;':,,::-. -:-.:_t-.;7 '.'...,i-:-.‘.74,--4::. • :!I:.•-r•----11 ----r— . ',. •'. ., t_ '.. • z '''-=- "lki..A. '.''<-,-ZiYil- -.,i ,-aT,;-1•4. - ,1-c•-i`-,:,':;,•-•i'-,-- • :!i .1,• '!i__. •li - • t• -.---.11.,• :::i*.r.--",,,fli• I: ,. ,..,,,,,,,•;...,,, , „..._,„ , „......; -..4,•,„,-,--;:.„,„•,„, • .., .I• •.....7.;.--.,.• , • ,, 3-:-.,-1,-- ...• D., ..F.,,,,,,•,,,-;>. •.7.,...".,'._..".-•_:!'"„,,... ,.. .--".r...f:_:: • •I, •I * •••.\ .11 .... ii,•_10•;i• .1!., „il.• j!! ,-.,.....-.„,..,.....-....e- --z-...!•,•„ ,----.7.•,-..-..,-.Errk..,.,7, ....„..=;„..,,, t •1, .,..= t•• ..;• ,.,. ,:,..-y„,.•;-:-.-- ..-i-,,,-,Ii- ';-.:?;.,-/ iyv -1`..--t: (1) • :i: :111'. i ",,\t t...t.,..•tt,‘,.. ..,...-------3-a •••1 ... :::"... i?!L:1,11. ,;:::::;,-1;•.:1•7:,7:1,.:1'•..'-;-:f'....;:•;:,o,4...• ,• ••C‘••1,.i t,.t \ l___ f :1 I .:''-'•-•'''''''''''''''-''''L L44. /. to''',-s -'1-Mi::LizTe;:;,- *.t.5':.:.5',:- al 1'• \ \\' \\* •',,,-=-5--..• _*----cr----.`"-- *.ii: • II! i ,•,1--_•.•.1 .4.„: _ • ir ---1 --'.4i-...:-..,-4,---,? -,,,-.'•,--Ths ---- - ='-'-'4••-• t‘' '..' • ...•:....•' ••......!' f,,,:,,o. ' .. 11 : 1,, . I ••: 41 Qiii 10..-,_ _- 4'ii-44-ta:::.,`.:."--rill ' ••■ 4.2:_!JL___11!"..„.._:1,="._Z- --_:'.."1:7.77:2-'1'.•-;•_•-.5-.:.ni 0 A V. V,. ..,2,-------' •r__...- - _...L..-41. II .ii• ril .• *. .A.„...„...el..‘,.•• .,, •„.,-,-• •.,-_-_-_,I•-•,---; • •• ••• •', . •1, •,,• • ,.:•,, ,•'."., •,. s:;,-,Fril ...-:• V •. •• • T. i. It il.• 1: :I .1. .---;-:-.:—. :: L •,....-,:a,ozi.4.644-.•.35,,,,,, cv ..::: i ,;• •,, .41. • ...,,te. • • " -'' !': ii . .. .,,' , =la k:),,'--,-'1';‘)i=';'_'•:.•:;:,,,V-1.)*"2:1_1'‘., ,,,-_ .:::-..,' 1‘, '••• - •,./''• .•• .'-,--- _ --,F._-=----,---=.1 -•."•=---... ------_-_----......,---..,-- ---_,==_____--;-. „..•- ,N, .•:;• „....•,-7. ...„----;;;;-;,1:7 • .• 1.1:t -. x . : , .... •i •.• • ••••) ' •• • '1..7 ....‘•. .1, s....., ./..;. _■..,,,,.., .__________•i',;-,-,---=-V-r.'="-„== ,•=1.i 0 'il• • •••1,.... • - . _ . .I . — . - s -'--------——' '-5-•----.%)a•...-■4;"..:"1.=.!;"---111-'7'::' --;7-'--=;'•':'") .-\::. 1111° 4. c:c1,,‘„,..... ..,.. ..)..?"*<-;--::::: ._i 1.„.,......7.2 !: • 'N • a[ '". 11' • .. ,!. ft'•:■,- .,1 .-----E—'---r.------1.-i I' :i• •i •.. • , I, .--.-.4:' -..' .../4, ' ,/,` . .... ...---.=:....._:, . • : I ,.. .::•t I; .•: ' 1 . • • sk'---.) "--'.• .• •0, .. • .'r- -7/:•l ...... 7:": . ••• T; .•1• . I Lill air• •I .,1 a 1• ) , i. v A_ ••• =2..."' ••,,.--tTh,-,1 t. 11 f .i"i'• ti. •i! vA 5.•1;: •'1" .1 F. :: '/:' 1: Y 'II• II il •1 '1,7\ ,----- --;" ;:• .. '..._,L. ._;1 -1.; •il: •.. •II• -,. •.-., \,... ...• .....•-_,.. :,.,-------- --,, •i I:. Nk, 7....;[;., -...,.:...:,, ii. . -.1. \\ <-• .....-,--_,-; .:f:::::` • ;,' ,i,, .1, i.. •,, ,:•,.-,. •,....„,..---........--;• •_..-•`.-- : *.:n'i:------ -- .. ..,\..,,,../N:s„,--;AcT .'• .. —_•_.1.' !,. ‘,! ..-----'- -..9. . .sz.....7,..7-.' •-%___,/ •„-go- "' .• • • •••,1 1_ " IS --- %,, - -... !.. ;... I- ' • t ti $"...,,e ...„. s.\\,'.. •;,'-:',!;;• + ,,....------ --t:-:,... ... .),',2F0.54- 2'-.-------it • ••••,1 1. .;- . ,• i 1. I •• (!--,..,.----7-----=.-------,-...! 1.14.41;?.. -%•••••-•-\.......-- ir '•--- '---Tr. ••.i.....„ •• ....,...., .2.............-.., .• • •• •• l, ,I a , ........,, !: ,.1: !:• ',. I 1• 1 • ''.. s',. , ------''... :il• •'.I. 1, . _..--..... • ., 1 ..■ I . . •'\•,. •./..=' • ,...57.11.• 11 . . • • a 1'• •! •...; /11//) ...\ -;I I: o't ' •'1 it—Th • •••■••••• •/--• ...-•''• •••••-t.=..-1,-... ----,=:----=..,• .. .1, _, ... ..."..'" •I, !., I .., • `,., • -.ZS. ...1'. •%/•• ...,.=,------:-.-;• li •• •••I- .! I ^••• t..1"1 . • •• • ■ -`,..• ''',1 •-..". •„,/...-. .11 '.1• F . L_______H.. e_.__,.••...,..-,.. "?..--;,,,,,,, ,,,,,..- _......„_!,,,,-___,..._-__:,--_—_:1:;,_.:,:,-. 1: •i, .y..1 " . ., '''''..\--<!-- .: - L -- -• '\--" *-N---- "c:;,---- -• • P ' zsa ,V . , . • "" • -•,,,,,,,,,,\,,cc-K • •• .. • . .• „ •,,, _....--• ,•• .._ , . ••••,,,.....__• • .. H .. 'F.--P--,r-N• ) AN.,- •---./ • ,,,,.------- -1 ---3 1-- -=',1 •, --=----,.7-.---, • • • ‘sf ..-4'/D .\''. •;-,,----="f■ a "I `i! t••I. .1' '\:-.,„*„//ii-A,-* ),•. I/4 . •a or IT- -.1-...T. .,, ,i, ,, • ,• ., - ,_______ >4",j,"-- ,,,,,, N .x. •‘ ,;.: 1. :4-,-4.---,, ' -11 1 .7* I/1 N"../ • ir''''..- •-7•7:' 1: l'• •...• •:I' •1' • • <:''\•\ .•V••\A--,.) r •2::',. vi;• — .1 ,- ' ,. q if -- eit.:‘ •//. •,..-----zi .,. .; il 1... r.,. • A,- </-\\. x . ii „• ■1 q. p. .11• zz ,...,;,,,,,'■ . .r • , ,;, ,,. .,., .i■ .1 „ ••„.;--... _„4- , ,,..., • ,,,,• •,i..,w../.,,,,..„ .1 I': •,1 b• •.:.' :, •,-/, .);J;y•. •• :1, .1,• il• i.- 1. .rs_—_—_---------, ...---;\ .•.% •k. • N% ,-------1.---------------!. 1 !. 1. •:L jt. 0• (7 ••.j. .1: •::. . ,e-- .., qr CORKSCREW SW QUADRANGLE UNITED STATES FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF THIN OR 73 MINUTE SERIES(TOPOGRAPHIC' GEOLOGICAL SU .3 '.'■°7 qt .ssR:t2tkr.....■ . vsli afr .31 a. ' I _ -.' '' I ,■ 7-7 ...--2,-------i ,..,..-_---- --,.7-;_lligoA--.-t,- ----" ----------"It,Eit:--f---.-,2,-,---,:-----_----_-=-If , : : i i , —11 --- ,----•,-.-_----_-•-•_-____,w_-__•--, ; \s, „._ -__,..._ ,...-___• • I. • ! ! ; ' s ... I ' ._..._- I i I.' I ---- -„._.3......3 ,_ , , , _, -..-7:-.,::"...Z.. I i 10 I --r...-..i.=,'" ,-,-----. 4_------------).-:„... --:::,.:----,...,---_•-_--_-_,-`_-_7.--,---':-:• --.1-.---:_--7-_-;-:•:- -- - '--1 ,-,_...___ - • . ... ---• , -• ...„,_ - -'1-_-,-:-:--:--: - - -•=--- - .. - _ ■ _ -___ --_-.„---..„-- - , ,_ .,... ____ -_,,- _---! . _ _ H'i'''I I i:.'1 • - .-,7- _‘•:.2 ••• : •'. 1 I I, i i I _ , -----_--_,--_-,----..----,s- . ____-___-_..„,__-.,,,__„___ . , -_:--ss- 2:-.1"- ---___L___ __ ; r lig / . ---_-:-.. -vz7=---;:-: i-----------------------:-----------le. .:„. .__ _ 21-- :. _--_-- ---r-1.:-74,----!--.7-:::-_-=-_---.------:,7-:__-_-_----- , -_- '- --:- c_,, _..- ------...„..__..t _ _. •• . _ .., ,,..„_:„..._._:......zi.„_,_:„...__:__=„..4„ ____.:•,,_:::-.„-;,____...„._ , , :_-_ ;- • - -Ty= - --7,x--:;- - - -- -- .. ... L _..... „ _--_, ,._ _ ... p -.-.- =.,"--1:-=_-:--_-1:----_,7,_I-..-!- -----i.--.--,,--,---= _ _, ,. _ ._________- ____,_ ...-_-..‘,. __ _. .. .... , I ,__, ___- _.„, - _ ____,_ ..,4:, -- I .1-_. .i-..:_,-=./_,-_:.7! :. ,.;-:..Q. .-0-...•11:-:'---7'.;--.:-.e>-,:- --;I:="_-= i s.-------) + --- ---_-_ - _ 1 _ , ....- •••.-- - -___ .'" I .:-•'• ••••- , - •••'. .!•.- ---.; .-.-'•- I '..--•4; :•..-;IS-J...-.._"-Z-7---'-2-7--------- --z------- _-_ _-_- .1.. ---::- , _ _ ___ _ - • •... - _ ; 1... -.7 - -,,,,..:-...: ;I \ '-!..-- ._1_--• r-_ II .--7 %., . :27:77:-:----.7--17:7-t--"--:--- --'------_---:---.2.:-7----z-7: - .--,:7---:,----,•_-:-.7----T-ii:--...---,11-7,77. ---I-_-_..--.:7-:-7,::::. . I _ I : ---.._ _"--;-:---_Ift:-: .- --._--2------=-_-',-•:-.2-:-.--,- ,::----'..-----!..•!* -- - -... -.±---2%.,'-----I----=';'------ :-- ---"-10 ''''' ----::, -:-?'--7---'----7:7 ---.:7:71:-:.:1';'=::-.17_•-1,----•!--f-s:=_--:-.:Z:-1:-72— •-_=,5j.-7--_-:_7--..7,•-- .—__ -_ ___,. I I __ -.:7-, , II P I ------F , ,- ,,A.,---- --------------N •-• 1---A_,E.-= -7--- --.7--",:: :------- - ,_.., f•-"=,•-----_-_-:-: _-------2-----IT--,:--.1 • i ^, -'----'...,-11":-:,:---'-;-'-'^-?--..n t ■ 1 ( i - -__-_-.____:, - - - —--- _-- - • • ---_----- -7 i., _ __ __ _) -_.;-:-_-.:-----7.-•,.--- 1 / 17 16 ; __- . eLff..,-7_,,i, __ 13(' 9 ,,, ..• i 11.#ii - ..-.. .... . . . ■ ..- • tY h°• ''". 'k 1 ,.. i + -,- ..„ ,--.--,, .1 ‘_.. - : _- tv, -. -1 -:, • _ _-_--_,' ---7. : '121_--••---_=:.-1. - yv, --ir. -.A :,- ,.,-,.., - ----, if--_ -...-E.__ ill '-. - - - --' - _- ' ::-Fr. .: ---:-. :,- -:--•:t:_:- T:-..ts.-- :--:,---:-_'1,:r-111 --,f-. '''-' - '••. --f .2'7.- 7------ ' . , .----s-71,_:,--,---_---t-,•-•-_--.7---,,r:;-_-__;_,::- = -- --: %T-- :.-----19 : : - . 22 '1:•-• ft*:*.:. ....!:-. 11 '..' - :.V. 1 ', - 4•-• 'A.',, --4„.4.4 ,,,_ :.• -.--: ` 1 1 i - .-... -' - Il '- ,r''.i.a-24-1&,1,4!...:=';:ii'-,,• ilig•••,qV-1-`-±4'.?_---4t.F.4:-24S-.4 - ::71-'':' --,--, -. _ .s' 1 __-_-:-:'...•_-;.-_----7;:_.:72.:___:_z,;:_.kn-77._:__zi i-_ ii : ;. ', :::::-.i..;;;____'..:,...-"_.L,.-----, '''C'• .:1!el. --.,-,::, ,• :.---,--ri -,,,,, - , \.):. s • --7-.... • -Z. - -- -.- - - ;•.--''.:-"::::\2'...: :-.7- • : : ,- ,- .• .- -. . . , -- -- . • -__ --■ . . _ - . 1;', ' . ..- - .. j':,.. • . . ... - 8 --' 2; , -- -.---,,, ,,,„-:• . 25 r--"----- ••-•?I''-. --'... 7,.._=,'',..-.:-,,,_...;_.,-:...:, _-;,.!,,, -_,F., I. ..'..0 r.''- .--. . . . I' ' - -- -... --.' • • • .' ---- . '-- ••-•,__-..:-_,7:-__7-17,-..--;-:_, -,, t,--:,_,I,-.-------_---_----:-±-.,-,--_,_.,---:,--.7--:-...-,t,-:--:...-'. • -.;-,, ..ft. ......--1- 'it- -••-=-'• : i "•------2. _- - . - -■ --...--,---ie:'_--••.,-7_-_._- - -L- - . . '.--" •1 I 7:: I d. . : ",-• • " --,' : ' --:---";---::,. \ 1 I.. . • • ''":" 1 _ _ \ .• - • -1 - ,--.P •s • ---7-fr --•••_.7--.,-- -.•-_--: '--7--------7:----- ".,--:--:..2"-=1.--=-1.----1-4-7-'....::---.1-_- .-=--_:.4 _ . • ---- - --'-_-----Z-...:_-:"..:-_-1"- -'---'1:-..--,..----- ---7..-r---,t."-:----`-.7-set,-"---•'---r. • -.7-----34--'_--;:,_:----•.---%-.-.7---:-t--:---."-- -:',.."--,7--:-..':i'-'1.7.-_-1-:"-:.--_-_-_-=_-_ Mapped.edited,and published by the Geological Suteei, WALE I 24000 ROAD CIASSIRCADON Control On USGS ano USCACoS '1 ■=, 1=11:=1 .--4"" P.O87.0.1. LOW,*n0.0.hold or 1•0 hard sorlace -Vilortmel surface - Secondary luAlmay. totem 1951-1952.rmineteaueetati3sur....,.i nee NAI sorface -UnanprOvET1 me. COMORO INTERVAL 5 FEET 10.0004.pie.baud on Florida coon...ornOnk RANONAL ALVORTIC'Mow.WWII OF ion ALIAI To pace at tee encielod Moth AnnomooTehm PM =4 =%=:=7" CORKSCREW SW,FLA. 260B1.-TE-024 ....Po*.lin.37 roe.so.and In am..on*nom Or Oa.cow tian no,00, 4810.5.00 ines.....edin 7 47 5.-11 26 E..,47 5.-14,27 6., 05nOV17 COLORADO 40120 08 RESTON R00 0000070,, 7001.04.0041002,00p.'04 0 080000. 1.48 S-11 25E.red!.a 5.-11 275. 0 000090 00070000 r08000426c 648000.0 000flS 00221040048 0,10 SAt 10)040 2208)0,000 ,01702,00IOtOV.o 1084 peooronEnosED loll ana omer source% Ris EnforrnaOn not bel0 checked Dm A•Aa I eV-OMER v.. . 7 Seminole Tribe of Florida Immokalee Reservation i \ V//,' f =Cocohatchee C =- - 1 . .. .. .. .. .. .. :'. 0 - - .- . Ave Maria 7 4_ocohatchee B trA, / v..,A Golden Gate +y Estates :mow°: .„ ► olden Gate; �� 1 � ii t a4 rP; ,�• Henderson —"*.---*." Plal IY, : akahatch: Union-Mill DistrictG "'.."' - .Ye do yp:�f P.,mod wr m' AREA NOT .W. , -..:.:-.=::2.-".::::-23.:f:." 'RESTUDIED ea ;f4 .a, ' , 1 " .9F= �cc'r_, Fakahatchee Southern Coastal Union-Strand p Marco Island � x *';'•% , er •°^p `-A,E, Everglades City T1 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY C) TICOLLIER COUNTY, FL MAJOR BASIN LOCATION MAR AND INCORPORATED AREAS 29 9(t5 1t2 dig 174r-4 usGs science for a changing world lop o r a h i c M a g p p Symbols What is a Topographic Map? A map is a representation of the Earth, Reading Topographic Maps or part of it. The distinctive character- Interpreting the colored lines,areas,and other symbols is the first istic of a topographic map is that the step in using topographic maps.Features are shown as points,lines, shape of the Earth's surface is shown or areas,depending on their size and extent.For example,individual by contour lines. Contours are iiTiag- houses may be shown as small black squares.For larger buildings, inary lines that join points of equal the actual shapes are mapped.In densely built-up areas,most indi- elevation on the surface of the land vidual buildings are omitted and an area tint is shown.On some above or below a reference surface, maps,post offices,churches,city halls,and other landmark buildings such as mean sea level. Contours are shown within the tinted area. make it possible to measure the The first features usually noticed on a topographic map are the height of mountains, depths of area features,such as vegetation(green),water(blue),and densely the ocean bottom, and steep- built-up areas(gray or red). ness of slopes. Many features are shown by lines that may be straight,curved, A topographic map shows solid,dashed,dotted,or in any combination.The colors of the lines more than contours. The usually indicate similar classes of information:topographic contours map includes symbols (brown);lakes,streams,irrigation ditches,and other hydrographic that represent such fed- features(blue);land grids and important roads(red);and other roads tures as streets,buildings, and trails,railroads,boundaries,and other cultural features(black). At one time,purple was used as a revision color to show all feature streams, and vegetation. changes.Currently,purple is not used in our revision program,but These symbols are con- purple features are still present on many existing maps. stantly refined to better relate to the features they Various point symbols are used to depict features such as buildings, represent, improve the campgrounds,springs,water tanks,mines,survey control points, appearance or readability of and wells.Names of places and features are shown in a color cor- the map, or reduce production responding to the type of feature.Many features are identified by cost. labels,such as"Substation"or"Golf Course." Topographic contours are shown in brown by lines of different Consequently, within the same widths.Each contour is a line of equal elevation;therefore,contours series, maps may have slightly dif- never cross.They show the general shape of the terrain.To help ferent symbols for the same feature. the user determine elevations,index contours are wider.Elevation Examples of symbols that have values are printed in several places along these lines.The narrower changed include built-up areas, roads, intermediate and supplementary contours found between the index intermittent drainage, and some letter- contours help to show more details of the land surface shape.Con- ing styles. On one type of large-scale tours that are very close together represent steep slopes.Widely topographic map, called provisional, spaced contours or an absence of contours means that the ground Some symbols and lettering are hand- slope is relatively level.The elevation difference between adjacent contour lines,called the contour interval,is selected to best show drawn. the general shape of the terrain.A map of a relatively flat area may have a contour interval of 10 feet or less.Maps in mountainous areas may have contour intervals of 100 feet or more.The contour interval is printed in the margin of each U.S.Geological Survey (USGS)map. Bathymetric contours are shown in blue or black,depending on their location.They show the shape and slope of the ocean bottom surface.The bathymetric contour interval may vary on each map and is explained in the map margin. U.S.Department of the Interior U.S.Geological Survey . 90 BATHYMETRIC FEATURES COASTAL FEATURES - Area exposed at mean low tide;sounding Foreshore flat datum line*** Channel*** Coral or rock reef 4:crikktkt(23 .....te.c.r>.441:‘3111rgih- Sunken rock*** + Rock,bare or awash;dangerous BOUNDARIES to navigation ...... .. National ------- Group of rocks,bare or awash +;* .;.•. State or territorial -----—- Exposed wreck as as County or equivalent ----- Civil township or equivalent Depth curve;sounding i- _ 23 Incorporated city or equivalent ------------- Breakwater,pier,jetty,or wharf _VW- Federally administered park, — — —• Seawall reservation,or monument(external) Federally administered park, — — — Oil or gas well;platform • • reservation,or monument(internal) CONTOURS State forest,park,reservation,or —_—.—• Topographic monument and large county park Forest Service administrative area* — —. Index �_s000 Forest Service ranger district* Approximate or indefinite National Forest System land status, Intermediate Forest Service lands* National Forest System land status, Approximate or indefinite non-Forest Service lands* Supplementary Small park(county or city) Depression (� BUILDINGS AND RELATED FEATURES Building •'--'O- Cut o v School;house of worship r I --- Athletic field , Fill A Built-up area Continental divide ————_ Bathymetric Forest headquarters* Index*** `'-'--_____ Ranger district office* A Intermediate*** --..._________. Guard station or work center* i Racetrack or raceway ® Index primary*** ---__---_______ Primary �'---� Airport,paved landing strip, C:::) :1 runway,taxiway,or apron Supplementary*** I I CONTROL DATA AND MONUMENTS Unpaved landing strip Principal point** 0320 Well(other than water),windmill or wind generator Oo s U.S.mineral or location monument .USMM 438 Tanks .••/� River mileage marker +e Covered reservoir ® //// Boundary monument Third-order or better elevation, Gaging station • with tablet BM O 9134 BM' 277 Located or landmark object(feature as labeled) • Third-order or better elevation, n recoverable mark,no tablet 5sza Boat ramp or boat access* i With number and elevation 67 n,56, Roadside park or rest area ,• Horizontal control Third-order or better,permanent mark A Neace +Neace Picnic area IN w With third order or better elevation BM A Pike 52 *BM393 Campground [Al 1 With checked spot elevation A 1012 Winter recreation area* ® Coincident with found section cornere- cactus I Cactus. Cemetery o::;_;jcem;if] Unmonumented** + Ilgt CONTROL DATA AND MONUMENTS-continued PROJECTION AND GRIDS Vertical control --J 39°15' 7 Third-order or better elevation,with tablet BM Neatline X 5280 90°37'30" Third-order or better elevation, x 528 Graticule tick --155' recoverable mark,no tablet Bench mark coincident with found BM Graticule intersection -+- section corner —±5280 Datum shift tick -+- Spot elevation x 7523 State plane coordinate systems GLACIERS AND PERMANENT SNOWFIELDS /� Primary zone tick 1640 000 FEET Contours and limits _, Emile, Secondary zone tick 247 500 METERS Formlines �a I JII'''jl Tertiary zone tick .260 000 FEET LLil1`LIV Quaternary zone tick 98 500 METERS Glacial advance " Quintary zone tick .320 000 FEET Glacial retreat C-=ms's Universal transverse metcator grid LAND SURVEYS UTM grid(full grid) 273 Public land survey system Range or Township line UTM grid ticks* 1269 Location approximate RAILROADS AND RELATED FEATURES Location doubtful — — — — Standard guage railroad,single track �-.—._ Protracted Standard guage railroad,multiple track +.--« Protracted(AK 1:63,360-scale) Narrow guage railroad,single track _--, Range or Township labels Ri E T2N Section line Narrow guage railroad,multiple track ..■■ � Location approximate Railroad siding Location doubtful — — — — Railroad in highway Protracted Railroad in road ..--.—.. - - Protracted(AK 1:63,360-scale) Railroad in light duty road* Section numbers 1 -36 Railroad underpass;overpass -,-'—. I Found section corner —i— Railroad bridge;drawbridge I Found closing corner — i — Railroad tunnel •—�___sit--4 WC . Witness corner -- Witness Railroad yard Meander corner —a Mc - I Weak corner* —+— Railroad turntable;roundhouse -.—+� I Other land surveys RIVERS,LAKES,AND CANALS Range or Township line Perennial stream --_____- Section line Perennial river ,'' Land grant,mining claim,donation land —. — — Intermittent stream —� -`- claim,or tract _ Land grant,homestead,mineral,or ,..77- other special survey monument Intermittent river Fence or field lines ---- —— MARINE SHORELINES Disappearing stream ----.1. --`.4 Shoreline --�- Falls,small Apparent(edge of vegetation)*** Falls,large T Indefinite or unsurveyed --- Rapids,small MINES AND CAVES -----Rapids,large Quarry or open pit mine X ------- Gravel,sand,clay,or borrow pit x , / Mine tunnel or cave entrance -4 i Masonry dam Mine shaft • - / iiiiIiiiii Prospect x \_1111/I \ I ( Tailin g s l— xl 1. Dam with lock Mine dump \ \ r L Former disposal site or mine Dam carrying road WIL RIVERS,LAKES,AND CANALS-continued SUBMERGED AREAS AND BOGS n Perennial lake/pond Q O Marsh or swamp Intermittent lake/pond 0 O L_ Submerged marsh or swamp = Dry lake/pond n i`_ dre Wooded marsh or swamp Narrow wash -- — — — Submerged wooded marsh or swamp — - Wide wash - ;fVash• ".. — Canal,flume,or aqueduct with lock —*— =____=_ Elevated aqueduct,flume,or conduit r--_--- Land subject to inundation 1=====_=_� Aqueduct tunnel -- ___ -- ___ - €____=_ Water well,geyser,fumarole,or mud pot 00 ,, x Pool`1,3! Spring or seep • SURFACE FEATURE S ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES Please note:Roads on Provisional-edition maps are not classified Levee _JAM_ as primary,secondary,or light duty.These roads are all classified as improved roads and are symbolized the same as light duty roads. Sand or mud , Sand,; Primary highway Secondary highway Disturbed surface Light duty road Gravel beach or glacial moraine I Grovel Light duty road,paved* Light duty road,gravel* Tailings pond I fal sl Light duty road,dirt* ,f_ i Light duty road,unspecified* TRANSMISSION LINES AND PIPELINES Unimproved road =_____- Unimproved road* ======2 Power transmission line; 4WD road - pole;tower 4WD road* __ °' Telephone line --- Telephone Trail - Highway or road with median strip Aboveground pipeline Underground pipeline --- Pipeline Highway or road under construction ='_ —— Const VEGETATION Highway or road underpass;overpass .I� Woodland Highway or road bridge;drawbridge b Shrubland Highway or road tunnel ____=aim. Orchard Road block,berm,or barrier* Gate on road* Vineyard Trailhead* 1F1:11 Mangrove ° .ciii-,,--. we fin,_°� J *USGS-USDA Forest Service Single-Edition **Provisional-Edition maps only. Quadrangle maps only. Provisional-edition maps were established to expedite In August 1993,the U.S.Geological Survey and the completion of the remaining large-scale topographic U.S.Department of Agriculture's Forest Service signed quadrangles of the conterminous United States.They an Interagency Agreement to begin a single-edition contain essentially the same level of information as the joint mapping program.This agreement established the standard series maps.This series can be easily recognized coordination for producing and maintaining single-edition by the title"Provisional Edition"in the lower right-hand primary series topographic maps for quadrangles containing corner. National Forest System lands.The joint mapping program eliminates duplication of effort by the agencies and results in a more frequent revision cycle for quadrangles containing ***Topographic Bathymetric maps only. National Forests.Maps are revised on the basis of jointly developed standards and contain normal features mapped by the USGS,as well as additional features required for effi- Topographic Map Information cient management of National Forest System lands.Single- For more information about topographic maps edition maps look slightly different but meet the content, produced by the USGS,please call: accuracy,and quality criteria of other USGS products. 1-888-ASK-USGS or visit us at http://ask.usgs.gov/ ISBN 0-607-96942-3 Printed on recycled paper 9 II 111 Ilil Il1011 Il 111111110 9125/(2. 3. A blow-up of the Lakeside area from the panel map. Note how vague (useless) it is for determining your flood zone if you're close to the edge of a zone. 4. Blow-ups from the Collier County on-line DFIRM website of the south shore of the lake at Lakeside showing buildings 2841 and 2761 touched by the AE zone. 50(Alz;c- g06 E/ , frA 1/0/! 5. Letter from IRMS telling Lakeside that Units 2811 , 2841 , and 2861 are in the AE flood zone, because of determinations done by CoreLogic out of Austin Texas. 6. Blowup of the positions of buildings 2811 , 2841 , and 2861 in relation to the AE zone. 7 Bills for $2250 for survey and LOMA- related work to verify that the buildings are in the X-zone. Bottom line is that developments are living at the whim of a faceless, nebulous bureaucracy that wants us to have all the responsibility and none of the authority. -THESE /horn sof Ail A !S on t,V 'irho N History: 3 Aug 99 at the BCC meeting, Item 10 E... the BCC voted to challenge the new FEMA maps. 9'241/2 In January 2001 , Abe Skinner (bless his soul) for some reason, had a LiDAR topography done of Collier County along with his usual yearly aerial photos. The LiDAR wasn't available until after June 2001 and we didn't learn about it for a few months after that. That's when we started comparing it to the new Flood Insurance Rate maps. 31 Jul 01 , the BCC passed Resolution 2001 -312 rejecting FEMA's proposed map changes. Following the September 11 , 2001 attacks, Congress passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to better coordinate among the different federal agencies that deal with law enforcement, disaster preparedness and recovery, border protection and civil defense. FEMA was absorbed into DHS effective March 1 , 2003. The folks we were dealing with had their e-mail addresses changed from @fema.gov to @dhs.gov. On about September 2002 staff and others (Joe Schmitt, Dick Tomasello, Patrick White, Bob Devlin, Ken Pineau and I) met with FEMA in Atlanta and showed them the Appraiser's LiDAR superimposed on their maps. At that meeting, FEMA agreed to keep Golden Gate as a D zone and to implement the rest of the maps until Dick Tomasello had finished his al2St12 restudy of Golden Gate and the Coastal surge. Golden Gate was known as the sheet 2D study. We then started the process of having the LiDAR certified by the contractor, 3001 , and obtaining LiDAR for the eastern developed County from USACOE out to SR 29, and coordinating with the State of Florida and the National Geodetic Service for benchmark densification and placement (to NAVD) throughout Golden Gate Estates and near the Immokalee area, 2008 LiDAR vs 2001 LiDAR... /1,001V1 ( jU 1 Ord( p - ►3 v i 0 us (iU F-(J L C-L. sv RE Al& ( 7D © T �C/d l &J CYO M tis I7OA.) fn AGREEMENT NO.FC299 Z. 16 MAII-3193 COOPERATIVE 6 A 1 2 TIVE FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR DENSIFICATION OF NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM 1988 (NAVD 88) THIS COOPERATIVE FUNDING AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between COLLIER COUNTY a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose address is 3301 East Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY" and the FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, an agency of the State of Florida, whose address is 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 105, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000, hereinafter referred to as the "DEP." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the DEP and the COUNTY desire to combine their resources and efforts to densify the North American Vertical Datum 1988 (NAVD 88) in Collier County, hereinafter referred to as the"PROJECT"; and WHEREAS the DEP and the COUNTY have agreed on the services and/or funding each shall contribute towards completing or accomplishing the PROJECT. NOW, THEREFORE, the DEP and the COUNTY, in consideration of the mutual terms, covenants and conditions set forth herein, agree as follows: PROJECT MANAGER AND NOTICES Each party hereby designates the employee set forth below as its respective Project Manager. Project Managers shall assist with PROJECT coordination and shall be each party's prime contact person. Notices or reports shall be sent to the attention of each party's Project Manager by U.S. mail, postage paid, to the parties addresses as set forth below: Project Manager for DEP: Randy Harrell, PSM. 3900 Commonwealth Blvd. Mail Station 105 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 Project Manager for the COUNTY: Stan Chrzanowski Engineering Review Manager Collier County Community Development,Engineering Services 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples,Fl 34104 16Al2 1.1 The COUNTY'S Project Manager is hereby authorized to approve requests to extend a PROJECT task deadline set forth in this Agreement. Such approval shall be in writing, shall explain the reason for the extension, and shall be signed by the Project Manager and his/her Department Director. The COUNTY'S Project Manager is not authorized to approve any time extension which will result in an increased cost to the COUNTY or any time extension which will likely delay the final PROJECT task deadline. 1. SCOPE OF WORK Upon receipt of written notice to proceed from the COUNTY, the DEP shall perform the services necessary to complete the PROJECT in accordance with the Proposed Project Plan set forth in Exhibit "A", `B", & "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein. Any changes to this Scope of Work and associated costs shall be mutually agreed to in a formal written amendment approved by the COUNTY and the DEP prior to being performed by the DEP. 2. FUNDING The parties anticipate that the total cost of the PROJECT will be One Hundred Ten Thousand Ninety-Eight Dollars ($110,09&00). The COUNTY agrees to fund PROJECT costs up to Fifty Five Thousand Forty Nine Dollars ($55,049.00) and shall have no obligation to pay any costs beyond this maximum amount. The DEP agrees to fund PROJECT costs up to Fifty Five Thousand Forty Nine Dollars($55,049.00), and shall be responsible for all costs in excess of the anticipated total PROJECT cost. 3.1 The COUNTY shall reimburse the DEP for its share of PROJECT costs in accordance with the Project Budget set forth in Exhibits`B"& "C." Payment shall be made to the DEP within sixty(60) days of receipt of an invoice, with the appropriate support documentation, which shall be submitted to the COUNTY at the following address: do Stan Chrzanowski, P.E. CDES 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples,FL 34104 3.2 The DEP shall not use any COUNTY funds for any purposes not specifically identified in the above Scope of Work. 3.3 Each invoice shall include the following certification, and the DEP hereby agrees to delegate authority to its Project Manager to affirm said certification: "I hereby certify that the costs requested for reimbursement and the DEP's matching funds, as represented in this invoice, are directly related to the performance under the Densification of North American Vertical Datum 1988 (NAVD 88) Agreement between Collier County and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Agreement No. ), are allowable, allocable, properly documented, and are in accordance with the approved project budget. 3.4 The COUNTY'S performance and payment pursuant to this Agreement is contingent upon the Board of County Commissioners appropriating funds for the PROJECT. 16Al2 4. CONTRACT PERIOD This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by all parties and shall remain in effect until December 31, 2003, unless terminated or extended in writing by mutual written agreement of the parties. 5. PROJECT RECORDS AND DOCMENTS Each party shall, upon request, permit the other party to examine or audit all PROJECT related records, and documents during or following completion of the PROJECT. Each party shall maintain all such records, and documents for at least three (3) years following completion of the PROJECT. All records and documents generated or received by either party in relation to the PROJECT are subject to the Public Records Act in Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 6. REPORTING The DEP shall provide the COUNTY with any and all reports, models, studies maps or other documents resulting from the PROJECT. 7. LIABILITY Each party hereto agrees that it shall be solely responsible for the negligent acts or omissions of its officers, employees, contractors and agents; however, nothing contained herein shall constitute a waiver by either party, of its sovereign immunity or the limitations set forth in Section 768-2 8, Florida Statutes. 8. DEFAULTS Either party may terminate this Agreement upon the other party's default in complying with any term or condition of this Agreement, as long as the terminating party is not in default of any term or condition of this Agreement. To effect termination, the terminating party shall provide the defaulting party with a written"Notice of Termination" stating its intent to terminate and describing the term and/or condition with which the defaulting party has failed to comply. If the defaulting party has not remedied its default within thirty (30) days after receiving the Notice of Termination, this Agreement shall automatically terminate. 9. TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE This Agreement may be terminated by the COUNTY without cause upon fifteen(15) days written notice to the DEP. Termination shall be effective upon the fifteenth (15th) day after the DEP's receipt of said notice. In the event of such termination the DEP shall be entitled to compensation for all services reasonably and properly incurred to the date of termination. 10. RELEASE OF INFORMATION The parties shall not initiate any verbal or written media interviews or issue press releases on or about the PROJECT without providing advance copies to the other party. This provision shall not be construed as preventing the parties from complying with the public records disclosure laws set forth in Chapter 119,Florida. Statutes. 11. COUNTY RECOGNITION The DEP shall recognize COUNTY funding in any reports, models, studies, maps, or other documents resulting from this Agreement, and the form of said recognition shall be subject to COUNTY approval. 12. ASSIGNMENT Neither party may assign or transfer its rights or obligations under this Agreement, including any operation or maintenance duties related to the PROJECT, without the written consent of the other party. 13. LAW COMPLIANCE Each party shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and guidelines, relative to performance under this Agreement. 14. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES The COUNTY expects the DEP to use good faith efforts to ensure that disadvantaged business enterprises, which are qualified under either federal or state law, have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in contracting' opportunities under this project Agreement. Invoice documentation submitted to the COUNTY under this Agreement shall Rfzs/j 1 16Al2 include information relating to the amount of expenditures made to disadvantaged businesses by the DEP in relation to this Agreement,to the extent the DEP maintains such information. _ 15. SUBCONTRACTORS Nothing in this Agreement shall create, or be implied to create; any relationship between the COUNTY and any subcontractor of the DEP. 16. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to benefit any person or entity not a party to this Agreement. 17. MODIFICATIONS This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and may be amended only in writing, signed by all parties to this Agreement. 18. DOCUMENTS The following document is attached and made a part of this Agreement. In the event of a conflict of contract terminology, priority shall first be given to the language in the body of this Agreement,then to Exhibit "A." 1. Exhibit"A" Scope of Work Exhibit "B" Schedule of Costs—First Phase Exhibit "C" Schedule of Costs—Second Phase Exhibit "D" Project Map-both phases The remainder of this page intentionally left blank. • 1(241 �1 16Al2 ATTEST: =`,,rc't;8pi•.'. ",4;"' DWIGHT_- M CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS •" " OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA • D6puttycle'r .°' ! Cha Irian'S y O HE , C,.'on1y.?a • ........ 3-24--6.3 Approved as'tg frh f aii leg suff y �"• ,•. Patrick G. White Assistant County Attorney COOPERATIVE FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR DENSIFICATION OF NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DAUM 1988 (NAVD 88) 1i4 16Al2 EXHBIT"A" SCOPE OF WORK INTRODUCTION. Collier County(COUNTY) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) have agreed that there are mutual benefits in the extension, densification and perpetuation of the North American Vertical Datum 88 (NAVD 88)geodetic control network. This work consists of the establishment of elevations to Second-Order, Class I leveling standards along approximately 56 miles of selected roadways in the COUNTY. This area lacks sufficient reliable vertical information and this run will provide needed control. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The work will be accomplished to rigorous federal standards with results published by the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA),National Geodetic Survey(NGS)as a part of the National Vertical Network. To accomplish the PROJECT, the COUNTY will contract with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection(FIDEP)to do the following: Run approximately 9.5 miles of levels (19 mile forward and reverse) to connect this PROJECT to existing NAVD 88 control in the area. Run approximately 56 miles of new levels (112 miles forward and reverse) on the selected road systems as shown on Appendix"A." Installing or recovering approximately 11 class "B" benchmarks and approximately 45 class "C" benchmarks. The approximately 56 points shall be in two forms: a Type 1: Approximately 11 class `B" benchmarks shall be installed or recovered by DEP to NGS specifications. An example of a class "B" benchmark is a stainless steel rod driven to. refusal, a 5 inch diameter PVC collar placed over the stainless steel rod, an aluminum cover place atop the PVC and concrete poured around the PVC. Type 2: Approximately 45 class"C" benchmarks shall be installed or recovered to NGS specifications. An example of a class "C" benchmark is a poured in place concrete monument with a brass survey disk set in the top of the monument. The concrete monument shall be 42 inches deep, 12 inches in diameter and bellied at the bottom. Collect data, elevations, In NAVD 88, for all benchmarks in the level loop, create benchmark "to reach" descriptions and benchmark location descriptions. 915(1 16Al2 16A, Submitting all data in blue book format to NGS for review, approval and entering into the National Vertical Network. The DEP shall notify the COUNTY when the data has been approved by NGS and is available through the National Vertical Network. PERFORMANCE SCEDULE The field work for this PROJECT shall begin within 90 days of the issuance of the notice to proceed pursuant to Article 2 of this Agreement and shall be completed by December 31, 2003. The data shall be filed with NGS no later than January 31, 2004. PROJECT BUDGET See Exhibits"B"&"C". The remainder of this page intentionally left blank. 102- Florida Department of Environmental Protection,Bureau of Survey and Mapping 1 6 A 12 (850)245-2606 fax(850)245-2645 EXHIBIT "B" COST ESTIMATE FOR A 2nd ORDER CLASS I VERTICAL LEVEL UNE 2003 NEW LEVEL UNE ALONG: GOLDEN GATE BLVD, EVERGLADES BLVD, DESOTO BLVD, 1.9 MILES OF CR 858, 1 MILE ALONG WILSON BLVD & 4 MILES ALONG 18th AVENUE N.W. THIS INCLUDES: APPROXIMATELY 97 MILES TOTAL OF 2nd ORDER CLASS I VERTICAL LEVELS ABOUT 42 MILES OF NEW LEVELS,ONE BENCHMARK WILL BE INSTALLED OR RECOVERED PER MILE PLUS ABOUT 6.5 MILES OF LEVELS TO CONNECT THIS UNE WITH EXISTING LEVEL LINES A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY 48.5 MILES FORWARD AND 48.5 MILES BACK AND (1) INSTALLING OR RECOVERING APPROXIMATELY 8 CLASS'S'BENCH MARKS, EXAMPLE:STAINLESS STEEL ROD MARK DRIVEN TO REFUSAL (2) INSTALLING OR RECOVERING APPROXIMATELY 34 CLASS°C"BENCH MARKS, EXAMPLE:POURED CONCRETE MONUMENT(42'DEEP X 12'DIA.,BELLIED) (3) RECOVERING APPROXIMATELY 10 EXISTING BENCHMARKS TO BE USED FOR 2nd ORDER TIE (4) DESCRIBING,TYPING AND PLOTTING ON QUAD MAPS ALL BENCH MARKS (5) SUBMITTING AU.DATA TO NGS FOR BLUE BOOKING IN THE NATIONAL VERTICAL NETWORK (5) TRAVEL TIME,DOWN TIME(RAIN,ETC.)TRANSPORTATION,PER DIEM,SALARY&BENEFITS FIELD/SUPERVISION $3,646 FIELD/RECON $2,863 FIELD!INSTALLING BENCH MARKS $9,656 FIELD!DESCRIBING,TYPING AND PLOTTING ON $4,296 QUAD MAPS ALL BENCH MARKS FIELD/LEVEUNG $35,259 OFFICE/SUPERVISION $2,736 OFFICE/COLLECTING,OA AND PROCESSING DATA $4,067 OFFICE/SUPPORT $2,235 IMATERIALS $5,460 I STAINLESS STEEL RODS,CONCRETE,WP POSTS,LOGO CAPS,ETC. SUB-TOTAL $70,418 REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT(10%OF SUB-TOTAL) $7,042 OVERHEAD (6%OF SUB-TOTAL) $4,225 TOTAL $81,685 FDEP PART OF THIS PROJECT- 50% OF TOTAL $40,842 COLLIER COUNTY PART OF THIS PROJECT- 50% OF TOTAL $40,842 Cooperative Funding Agreement Exhibit Bads Prepared by Randy Harrell 3/11/2003 °ffAi2 Florida Department of Environmental Protection,Bureau of Survey and Mapping 1.. A 1 2 (850)245-2606 fax(850)245-2645 v EXHIBIT "C" COST ESTIMATE FOR A 2nd ORDER CLASS I VERTICAL LEVEL UNE 2003 NEW LEVEL UNE ALONG: COUNTY ROAD 858 (BEGINNING AT CR 846 AND ENDING AT SR 29 MINUS 1.9 MILES BETWEEN EVERGLADES BLVD AND DESOTO BLVD) THIS INCLUDES: APPROXIMATELY 34 MILES TOTAL OF 2nd ORDER CLASS I VERTICAL LEVELS ABOUT 14 MILES OF NEW LEVELS,ONE BENCHMARK WILL BE INSTALLED OR RECOVERED PER MILE PLUS ABOUT 3 MILES OF LEVELS TO CONNECT THIS UNE WITH EXISTING LEVEL UNES A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY 17 MILES FORWARD AND 17 MILES BACK AND (1) INSTALUNG OR RECOVERING APPROXIMATELY 3 CLASS"B"BENCH MARKS, EXAMPLE:STAINLESS STEEL ROD MARK DRIVEN TO REFUSAL (2) INSTALUNG OR RECOVERING APPROXIMATELY 11 CLASS"C BENCH MARKS, EXAMPLE:POURED CONCRETE MONUMENT(42'DEEP X 12'DLL,BELLIED) (3) RECOVERING APPROXIMATELY 6 EXISTING BENCHMARKS TO BE USED FOR 2nd ORDER TIE (4) DESCRIBING,TYPING AND PLOTTING ON QUAD MAPS ALL BENCH MARKS (5) SUBMITTING ALL DATA TO NOS FOR BLUE BOOKING IN THE NATIONAL VERTICAL NETWORK (6) TRAVEL TIME,DOWN TIME(RAIN,ETC.)TRANSPORTATION,PER DIEM,SALARY&BENEFITS FIELD/SUPERVISION $1,271 FIELD/RECON $1,003 FIELD/INSTALLING BENCH MARKS $3,285 FIELD/DESCRIBING,TYPING AND PLOTTING ON $1,562 QUAD MAPS ALL BENCH MARKS FIELD/LEVELING $12,359 OFFICE/SUPERVISION $956 OFFICE/COLLECTING, DA AND PROCESSING DATA $1,457 OFFICE/SUPPORT $781 MATERIALS $1,820 STAINLESS STEEL RODS,CONCRETE,WP POSTS,LOGO CAPS,ETC. SUB-TOTAL $24,494 REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT(10%OF SUB-TOTAL) $2,449 OVERHEAD (6%OF SUB-TOTAL) $1 470 TOTAL $28A13 FDEP PART OF THIS PROJECT- 50% OF TOTAL $14,207 COLLIER COUNTY PART OF THIS PROJECT- 50% OF TOTAL $14,207 Cooperative Funding Agreement Exhibit Cads Prepared by Randy Harrell 3/11/2003 ctiSijh EXHIBIT "D" 16 A 12 I R25E I R26E I R27E I R28E I R29E I R30E I MAW COMITY 7................................. in Western n. 4 Collier County ~ Florida i § _. a In a i ti I- ,i a i - mZes A ;gar lH COLI TI , El 2m . \-, IA a =gym ma s m in ~ m 211112a MI n Ill rim R UM melee®mmQm CPI a a an mmmmommlIci im m .4 01 a a .411:11.7.17.4al 111 Ili I — 11611111111 -L' ria now _ e � � - IP - CIM -- ... m S C I O a O - -- ~ : .- -- '7 a f, .iv a O �:II in m 1.' . q -, 111 L)a� ' , iv illiti~ 'Ni V 1i� LEGEND i a SCAB �� EasnRC comma J $ C)rj t ' A 4 1 \ _ a a VS So am NNNNN. PROPOSED COMM. I R25E I R26E I R27E I R28E I R29E I R30E 1l2W TABLE 4: SFHA ZONE DEFINITION Zone Name ZONE SFHA SYMBOL Description underway. Zone X (500- X500 Out 11 An area inundated by 500-year flooding; year) an area inundated by 100-year flooding with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; or an area protected by levees from 100-year flooding. Zone X X Out 12 An area that is determined to be outside the 100- and 500-year floodplains. 100-year 100IC In 13 An area where the 100-year flooding is Flood contained within the channel banks Discharge and the channel is too narrow to Contained in show to scale. An arbitrary channel Channel width of 3 meters is shown. BFEs are not shown in this area, although they may be reflected on the corresponding profile. 500-year 500IC Out 14 An area where the 500-year flooding is Flood contained within the channel banks and Discharge the channel is too narrow to show to Contained in scale. An arbitrary channel width of 3 Channel meters is shown. Floodway FWIC In 15 An area where the floodway is contained Contained in within the channel banks and the Channel channel is too narrow to show to scale. An arbitrary channel width of 3 meters is shown. BFEs are not shown in this area, although they may be reflected on the corresponding profile. Flood Prone FPQ In 16 An area designated as a "Flood Prone Area Area" on a map prepared by USGS and the Federal Insurance Administration. This area has been delineated based on available information on past floods. This is an area inundated by 100-year flooding for which no BFEs have been determined. Area in SFHA IN In 17 An area designated as within a "Special Flood Hazard Area" (or SFHA) on a FIRM. This is an area inundated by 100-year flooding for which BFEs or velocity may 20 FEMA Map Service Center - FEMA Flood Zone Designations Page 1 9f 2 gin/T.1 FEMA Map Service Center Product Catalog Map Search I Quick Order I Digital Post Office I Help Log on Home > FEMA%20FIood%20Zone%20Designations Definitions of FEMA Flood Zone Designations Flood zones are geographic areas that the FEMA has defined according to varying levels of flood risk. These zones are depicted on a community's Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)or Flood Hazard Boundary Map. Each zone reflects the severity or type of flooding in the area. Moderate to Low Risk Areas In communities that participate in the NFIP,flood insurance is available to all property owners and renters in these zones: ZONE DESCRIPTION Area of moderate flood hazard,usually the area between the limits of the 100-year and 500-year floods.Are also B and X(shaded) used to designate base floodplains of lesser hazards,such as areas protected by levees from 100-year flood,or shallow flooding areas with average depths of less than one foot or drainage areas less than 1 square mile. C and X(unshaded) Area of minimal flood hazard,usually depicted on FIRMs as above the 500-year flood level. High Risk Areas In communities that participate in the NFIP,mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply to all of these zones: ZONE DESCRIPTION Areas with a 1%annual chance of flooding and a 26%chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage. A Because detailed analyses are not performed for such areas;no depths or base flood elevations are shown within these zones. AE The base floodplain where base flood elevations are provided.AE Zones are now used on new format FIRMs instead of A1-A30 Zones. Al-30 These are known as numbered A Zones(e.g.,A7 or A14).This is the base floodplain where the FIRM shows a BFE(old format). Areas with a 1%annual chance of shallow flooding,usually in the form of a pond,with an average depth ranging AH from 1 to 3 feet.These areas have a 26%chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage. Base flood elevations derived from detailed analyses are shown at selected intervals within these zones. River or stream flood hazard areas,and areas with a 1%or greater chance of shallow flooding each year,usually AO in the form of sheet flow,with an average depth ranging from 1 to 3 feet.These areas have a 26%chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage.Average flood depths derived from detailed analyses are shown within these zones. Areas with a temporarily increased flood risk due to the building or restoration of a flood control system(such as AR a levee or a dam).Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements will apply,but rates will not exceed the rates for unnumbered A zones if the structure is built or restored in compliance with Zone AR floodplain management regulations. Areas with a 1%annual chance of flooding that will be protected by a Federal flood control system where A99 construction has reached specified legal requirements.No depths or base flood elevations are shown within these zones. High Risk - Coastal Areas In communities that participate in the NFIP,mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply to all of these zones: https://msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/info?storeId=10001&catalogId=10001&lan... 9/9/2012 FEMA Map Service Center - FEMA Flood Zone Designations Page 2 of 2 gicR- *1 ZONE DESCRIPTION Coastal areas with a 1%or greater chance of flooding and an additional hazard associated with storm waves. V These areas have a 26%chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage. No base flood elevations are shown within these zones. Coastal areas with a 1%or greater chance of flooding and an additional hazard associated with storm waves. VE,VI -30 These areas have a 26%chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage.Base flood elevations derived from detailed analyses are shown at selected intervals within these zones. Undetermined Risk Areas ZONE DESCRIPTION D Areas with possible but undetermined flood hazards.No flood hazard analysis has been conducted. Flood insurance rates are commensurate with the uncertainty of the flood risk. FEN1A.gov I Accessibility j Privacy Policy 1 FAQ I Site Help I Site Index I Contact Us FEMA Map Service Center,P.O.Box 3617 Oakton,Virginia 22124-9617 Phone:(877)336-2627 Adobe Acrobat Reader required to view certain documents.Click here to download. https://msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/info?storeId=10001&catalogId=10001&lan... 9/9/2012 r 9[241- To determine the floodplain boundaries in the coastal areas,the WSELs were processed to create Triangular Irregular Networks(TINs). These were compared to the ground surface raster using GIS techniques. Whenever the TIN flood elevation was above the ground surface elevation,that area was designated either Zone AE or Zone VE,depending on the designation along the transect. If the stillwater elevation was less than the raster ground surface elevation, the area was determined to be above the 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood and was designated Zone X(unshaded). The 1-percent and 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundaries are shown on the FIRM. On this map,the 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundary corresponds to the boundary of the Special Flood Hazard Areas, Zones A, AE, AH, V, and VE, and the 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundary corresponds to the boundary of areas of moderate flood hazards. In cases where the 1-percent and 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundaries are close together, only the 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundary has been shown. Small areas within the floodplain boundaries may lie above the flood elevations, but cannot be shown due to limitations of the map scale and/or lack of detailed topographic data. For areas of the county studied by less detailed methods,only the 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundary is shown on the FIRM. 4.2 Floodways Encroachment on floodplains, such as structures and fill, reduces flood-carrying capacity, increases flood heights and velocities, and increases flood hazards in areas beyond the encroachment itself. One aspect of floodplain management involves balancing the economic gain from floodplain development against the resulting increase in flood hazards. For purposes of the NFIP,a floodway is used as a tool to assist local communities in this aspect of floodplain management. Under this concept, the area of the 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain is divided into a floodway and a floodway fringe. The floodway is the channel of a stream,plus any adjacent floodplain areas,that must be kept free of encroachment so that the base flood can be carried without substantial increases in flood heights. Minimum Federal standards limit such increases to 1 foot,provided that hazardous velocities are not produced. The floodways in this study are presented to local agencies as minimum standards that can be adopted directly or that can be used as a basis for additional floodway studies. Due to the nature of flooding in Collier County(coastal flooding and ponding),no floodways were computed. 5.0 INSURANCE APPLICATION For flood insurance rating purposes,flood insurance zone designations are assigned to a community based on the results of the engineering analyses. These zones are as follows: Zone A Zone A is the flood insurance rate zone that corresponds to the 1-percent-annual-chance floodplains that are determined in the FIS report by less detailed methods. Because detailed hydraulic analyses are not performed for such areas,no BFEs or depths are shown within this zone. 34 M Thanks for appointing me to DSAC. One of the first things I volunteered for on DSAC was a subcommittee on the DFIRMs, but that's not why I'm here. My appearance here has nothing to do with DSAC. I was going to talk on Public Comment a few weeks before you went on summer vacation, but postponed it. I 'm here because of some FEMA issues with the subdivision where I live and because friends have told me that the same issues exist with their developments. I have some exhibits I'd like to put on the visualizer: 1 . An over all panel map of Collier County. The smallest panels appear to be about a little over 11 ,000 ft by 11 ,000 ft or about 4 square miles, with the larger panels being about 8, 16, 32 and 64 square miles. Before the age of computers, GIS, and digital mapping, panel sizes were changed as new development grew and more small panels were needed to show more detail. Panels are useless now other than for bureaucratic purposes. Changes should be done to basins and done basin-wide... not to panels. But, that's an engineering judgment. 2. The panel map for the Lakeside area with the legends explaining how to read the map. FEMA used to give away panel maps for free. From:Carole Rhodes FaxlD:2396497933 Page 8 of 11 Date:07/20/12 10:22 AM Page:8 of 11 Page 1 of 1 / 5 Z Contact Name:DIANA LOUISE TURNER STANDARD FLOOD HAZARD Contact Phone 2 39649-1444 DETERMINATION Contact Email: pmune(OIRMSINC.coin Contact Fax: 239649-7933 SECTION I-LOAN INFORMATION 1.LENDER NAME AND ADDRESS 2.COLLATERAL'Boilrling'MobileHonre-Persouo/Property PROPERTY ADDRESS(Legal Description may he artau'Iaedi Certified Address: 2861 'ITRUS LAKE DR REQUESTER: N ES FL 34109 3.LENDER ID.NO 4.LOAN IDENTIFIER 5.AMOUNT OF FLOOD INSURANCE REQUIRED SECTION II A.NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM(NFIP)COMMUNITY JURISDICTION 1.NFIP Community 2.Countv(ies) 3' 4.NFIP Community Number Name State COLLIER COUNTY UNINC( RPORATED FL 120067 AREAS B.NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM(NFIP)DATA AFFECTING BIIILDING.MOBILE HOME 1.NFIP Map Number or Community-Panel 2.NFIP Map Panel 3.LOM.AILOMR 4.Flood Zone 5.No NFIP Map Number Effective-' Revised Date (Conunuuity name.if not the same as"A") 120067-0382-H 5-16-2012 No AE No C.FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE AVAILABILITY(Check all that apply) (X)Federal Flood Insurance is available(community participates in NFIP). (X)Regular Program ( )Emergency Program of NFIP ( )Federal blood Insurance is not available because the community is not participating in time NFIP ( )Buidingl■fobile Home is in a Coastal Battier Resource Area(C'BRA)or Otherwise Protected Al'ea(OPA),Federal Flood Insurance may not be available C'BRA'OPA Designation date: D.DETERMINATION IS BUILDING/MOBILE HOME IN SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (ZONES BEGINNING WITH LETTER "A" OR "V")? [X] YES [ ] NO If yes.flood unsuiance is required by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. If no,flood insurance is not required by the Flood Disaste Protection Act of 19'3. E.COMMENTS: This flood determination is provided solely for the use and benefit of the entity named in Section 1,Box 1 in order to comply with the 1994 Reform Act and may not be used for or relied upon by any other entity or individual for any purpose,including,but not limited to deciding whether to purchase a property or determining the value of a property. Determination No. Borrower: MSA: 34940 State/County Code: 12-0067 C01_1207697672 Reg.Pgm.Entry: 9-141979 Parcel No: BFE: 10.5 BFD: Legal Description: Det Ref ID: 11099892 This detenuinatiou is based on examining the NFIP map.and any Federal Management Agency revisions to it.and any other i nfomiation needed to locate the buildinglmobile home on the NFIP map. . -• PARER',' NAME.ADDRESS DATE OF I)ETERIvIINATION CoreLogic Flood Services 11902 Burnet Road 7-19-2012 ustin, TX 78758 G.Prior . unity In ■ i 1.NFIP Map Number or Community-Panel 2.NFIP Map Panel 3.LOMALOMR 4.Flood Zone Determination Numb a Effective' Inquiries: Revised Date 120067-0385-G 11-17-2005 No X 800-371- 0061 From:Carole Rhodes FaxlD:2396497933 Page 7 of 11 Date:07/20/12 10:22 AM Page:7 of 11 Page 1 of I I L$N" Contact Name:DIANA LOiIISE TURNER STANDARD FLOOD HAZARD Contact Phone 239649-1444 DETERMINATION Contact Email pttunaVIRMSINC coin Contact Fax: 239649-7933 SECTION I-LOAN INFORMATION 1.LENDER NAME AND ADDRESS 2.COLLATER.AL+Buikfrrng_lkrbikHosrne Persona/hopern i PROPERTY ADDRESS(Legal Description urn be aitrcbeds Certified Address: 2841 'ITRUS LAKE DR REQUESTER: ES FL 34109 3.LENDER ID.NO 4.LOAN IDENTIFIER 5.AMOUNT OF FLOOD INSURANCE REQUIRED • SECTION II A.NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM(NFIP)COMMUNITY JURISDICTION 1.NFIP Community 2.County(ies) 3' 4.NFIP Community Number Name State COLLIER COUNTY UNINCORPORATED 120067 FL AREAS B.NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM(NFIP)DATA AFFECTING BUILDING MOBILE HOME 1.NFIP Map Number or Couunnmity-Panel 2.NFIP Map Panel 3.LOM.A LOMB 4.Flood Zone 5.No NFIP Map Number Effective Revised Date (Conuisnity name.if not the same as"A") 120067-0332-H 5-16-2012 No ® - No C.FEDERAL FLOOD INSURANCE AVAILABILITY(Cheek all that apply) (X)Federal Flood Insurance is available(community participates in NFIP). (X)Regular Program ( )Emergency Program of NFIP ( )Federal Flood Insurance is not available because the comm unity is not participating in the NFIP ( )Btrfldhngllfobile Home is in a Coastal Barrier Resource Area(CBRA)or Otherwise Protected Area(OPA),Federal Flood Insurance may not be available CBRA'OPA Designation date: D.DETERMINATION IS BUILDING/MOBILE HOME IN SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (ZONES BEGINNING WITH LETTER "A" OR "V")? [1] YES [ ] NO If yes.flood unsmance is required by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. If no.flood insurance is not required by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. E.COMMENTS: This flood determination is provided solely for the use and benefit of the entity named in Section 1,Box 1 in order to comply with the 1994 Reform Act and may not be used for or relied upon by any other entity or individual for any purpose,including,but not limited to deciding whether to purchase a property or determining the value of a property. DeterNnation No. Borrower: MSA: 34940 State/County Code: 12-0067 COl 120769'375 Reg.BFE:pro.c Entry: 9-14-1979 Parcel No: - 10. BFD: Legal Description: Det Ref ID: 11099869 This detantination is based on examining the NFIP map.and any Federal Management Agency revisions to it,and any other unfonnation needed to locate the building/mobil a on e�' F. ISRER'S INFORMATION ` 7V-AAIE.ADDRESS DATE OF DETERNINATION CoreLogic Flood Services 11902 Burnet Road 7-19-2012 ustin, TX 78758 G.Pr + 'ormafion 1.NFIP Map Nui nber or Cotmmtmity-Panel 2.NFIP Map Panel 3.LOMALOMR 4.Flood Zone Determination Nnanbd Effective' Inquiries: Revised Date 120067-0385-0 11-17-2005 No t 40()-371- 0061 rillitL11.111111 Invoice Date Invoice# 8/28/2012 11742 BENCHMARK LAND SERVICES , INC. Bill To 18071 & C Boulevard LakeSide of Naples Residence Association Naples, FL 34109 7600 North Airport Road Naples, FL 34109 P: 239-591-0778; 866-904-0778 F: 239-591-1195; 877-591-1195 contactbls @benchmarklandservices.com Benchmark# Ordered By Client File# 10605 Kathy Wood Description Invoiced Rate Amount 2811 Citrus Lake Drive 0 0.00 0.00 Naples, Fl 34109 Lakeside of Naples 0 0.00 0.00 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE - 1 more building 1 125.00 125.00 LOMA Certificates (9 buildings @ $125 per 1 1,125.00 1,125.00 building) Total $1,250.00 Thank you for the order, your business is appreciated. Payments/Credits $0.00 Balance Due $1,250.00 41/42 Invoice Date Invoice# 8/21/2012 11643 BENCHMARK LAND SERVICES , INC. Bill To 1807 J & C Boulevard LakeSide of Naples Residence Association Naples, FL 34109 7600 North Airport Road Naples, FL 34109 P: 239-591-0778; 866-904-0778 F: 239-591-1195; 877-591-1195 contactbls@benchmarklandservices.com Benchmark# Ordered By Client File# 10605 Kathy Wood Description Invoiced Rate Amount 2671 Citrus Lake Drive 1 0.00 0.00 Naples, FL 34109 2875 Citrus Lake Drive Naples, FL 34109 2885 Citrus Lake Drive Naples, FL 34109 2895 Citrus Lake Drive Naples, FL 34109 2781 Citrus Lake Drive Naples, FL 34109 2841 Citrus Lake Drive Naples, FL 34109 2861 Citrus Lake Drive Naples, FL 34109 2711 Citrus Lake Drive Naples, FL 34109 Total Thank you for the order, your business is appreciated. Payments/Credits Balance Due Page 1 Ok ,k1 Invoice Date Invoice# 8/21/2012 11643 BENCHMARK LAND SERVICES , INC. Bill To 1807 J &C Boulevard LakeSide of Naples Residence Association Naples, FL 34109 7600 North Airport Road Naples, FL 34109 P: 239-591-0778; 866-904-0778 F: 239-591-1195; 877-591-1195 contactbls@benchmarklandservices.com Benchmark# Ordered By Client File# 10605 Kathy Wood Description Invoiced Rate Amount Lakeside of Naples 1 0.00 0.00 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE (8 Buildings at $125 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 per building) Total $1,000.00 Thank you for the order, your business is appreciated. Payments/Credits $0.00 Balance Due $1,000.00 Page 2 9/24/ 4rƒ IJJ z - J wm ? � y U en eq f 6 2 ▪ a4c - � $ & 7 / q - > ? - 00C- / 3E £ 3 « « - �? _ > a a ■ o »_ - -�- 3 - �3 ®& y�� /- 3 ¥ 2wzt � «� / »� tk \ \ 22 / � #®/ \ wo ƒ ƒ / \ \ � © z = © ; , � , Q u , , e 2 © § a e § 7 2 , 2 ( § 8 ƒ " / / off - " ƒ - " 0 IX I— U) I CI- LLI Q < ° z \ / (I,> / \ ? 1- E / ) - • - Z O < w ( ° E / f O � � / C + -I w z z 0 0 _ 0.GIc N2 < ch ch <<X (0 ® Z ( O o0 x z z \ Z o z ( O IE ¥ • Ce >- U z a Q o W a a Z � ce U \ o \ c m N N } b - » § 0 _ W z a) ¥ 3 « L-a .„ -5. 5 LLI _0 k 1 0 g a . >- 0 O @ z Q - $ LIJ PL w J U & ¥ w 0 Z w § � G � -1 0 0 s / \ \ \ \ z VI w < Z 0 % \ ® / % w 0 >- k % »/ \ '5' t U- c z ± U- ._ \ / 7 \ g \ U \ /\ 0 3 - \ \ a @8a U ] § / § CO O � \ � + \ � Table u w 2 S / x z gf2Cf12 1 NGVD 29 NAVD 88 14' 14' ZONE AE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION ZONE AE (EL.14') A A (EL.13') _12' 12' 10' 10' — 8' 8' — _ 6' 6'— (EL.6.00') STILLWATER ELEVATION (EL.4.70') 4' 4' BENCHMARK 2' 2,— (EL 2.97') (EL.1.67') — 0'— NGVD of 1929 ' 1.30' NAVD of 1988— The difference between NGVD 1929 and NAVD 1988 is 1.30' NAVD 88=NGVD 29-1.30' This schematic illustrates the differences in BFEs due to datum conversion only Figure 4. Collier County Vertical Datum Conversion 4.0 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS The NFIP encourages State and local governments to adopt sound floodplain management programs. To assist in this endeavor,each FIS report provides 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain data,which may include a combination of the following: 10-percent, 2-percent, 1-percent, and 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood elevations; delineations of the 1-percent and 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplains;and a 1-percent-annual-chance floodway. This information is presented on the FIRM and in the Summary of Stillwater Elevation tables. Users should reference the data presented in the FIS report,as well as additional information that may be available at the local community map repository,before making flood elevation and/or floodplain boundary determinations. 4.1 Floodplain Boundaries To provide a national standard without regional discrimination,the 1-percent-annual-chance flood has been adopted by FEMA as the base flood for floodplain management purposes. The 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood is employed to indicate additional areas of flood risk in the community. For riverine areas,the 1-percent and 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood elevations were computed at each individual model grid cell. These values were used to create a raster surface of the WSEL at the grid scale. This raster surface was compared to a digital elevation model (DEM) created from LIDAR topographic data collected by 3001, Inc. in 2002 (Reference 20). A comparison of the rasters was conducted using a Geographic Information System(GIS),and all areas where the WSEL was above the ground surface elevation were designated as a 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain or 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain, as appropriate. To determine the boundaries between Zone AE and Zone AH,the model's depth results were used. If the flood depth was determined to be 3 feet or more above the raster ground elevation,the area was designated Zone AE. If the flood depth was less than 3 feet,the area was designated Zone AH. 33 etitskt 4 '? August 3, 1999 Item #10E PROPOSED JOINT MEETING WITH THE CITY OF NAPLES, CITY OF MARCO ISLAND AND CITY OF EVERGLADES CITY TO DISCUSS FEMA MAP CHANGES - COMMISSIONERS TO COORDINATE CALENDARS FOR SAID MEETING I quickly put this item on here about FEMA hoping that the board would agree that we should have a joint meeting among the cities and the county on this issue. It is -- COMMISSIONER BERRY: What did you have in mind? CHAIRPERSON MAC'KIE: Well -- COMMISSIONER BERRY: A few little things, but what did you have in mind? CHAIRPERSON MAC'KIE: FEMA is remapping. COMMISSIONER BERRY: Yeah, I know. CHAIRPERSON MAC'KIE: Okay. COMMISSIONER BERRY: But what -- what 's your -- help me -- MR. FERNANDEZ: I ' ll speak to that . The question is whether to -- how to go about the questioning or challenging the boundaries that have been established by FEMA in terms of the flood plain, whether the lines are accurately drawn or not . I think the question is whether it 's prudent to spend a lot of money for a consultant to do that . COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: And boiled down, Barb, to -- to -- because there have been so many natural disasters around the country in the last couple of years, FEMA' s a little tight on money. One of the ways that they can get more money is alter the boundaries here as to who has to pay into the insurance plan; in our case -- COMMISSIONER BERRY: Got you. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: -- flood insurance. It does not appear to be, and we haven't gone through the whole process, but it doesn't appear to be based on any factual information. They're just changing the lines for what appears to be a way of getting more money. But all of a sudden, you and me, who live eight miles inland, are now -- CHAIRPERSON MAC'KIE: Well, get flood insurance. COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: -- in front of that flood plain, and it's not based on any change in any data. It 's based solely on a need, it appears, based solely on a need for more money. And it 's something that will affect thousands of people and it probably is a good idea for us to fight . And I think it 's a great idea because it 's going to impact literally all the municipalities and county and everybody. COMMISSIONER BERRY: But my point is then how are you -- what -- what 's going to be the format of this meeting? Is this just a public meeting or is this -- CHAIRPERSON MAC'KIE: Let me get out the request that I had. COMMISSIONER CARTER: I think that Mr. Cautero can answer that. CHAIRPERSON MAC'KIE: Well, go ahead, Mr. Cautero. MR. CAUTERO: Vince Cautero again for the record. Development Services Advisory Committee as well as a technical group of people from the building industry and other affected individuals and engineers have been working with Bob Devlin, who is the flood plain management coordinator for the county for an interlocal agreement . Page 141 101' 41 August 3 , 1999 He would make a presentation at this meeting, it 's my understanding, with representatives of city/county, Everglades City as well as Marco. And most likely your Development Services Advisory Committee will recommend to you tomorrow that a formal letter be sent by the chair recommending the use of a consultant. It is very likely that Bob and the staff in our Building Department would concur with that recommendation and recommend that a consultant be hired. They have a particular individual in mind, with over 30 years of experience, who has challenged data from FEMA before and been successful. And Pinellas County is going through the same exercise right now. So, I think that will all come to fruition at this meeting and I believe Dr. Woodruff sent the letter to the county asking for it to be in early September -- CHAIRPERSON MAC'KIE: Yes. MR. MANALICH: -- I believe, sometime. COMMISSIONER BERRY: But this isn't a meeting open to the public, or it is? CHAIRPERSON MAC'KIE: Yes. MR. CAUTERO: Yes . COMMISSIONER BERRY: If it is, then do you think September is a good time because a lot of the people are not here. That 's my -- if you're looking -- if you're looking at just a staff kind of thing -- CHAIRPERSON MAC' KIE: I think the timing is important for the FEMA process . Am I right about that? MR. CAUTERO: That's correct . The timing is important to have it in September for comments. COMMISSIONER BERRY: Okay. CHAIRPERSON MAC'KIE: So, is there agreement we will coordinate calendars and -- COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: Great idea. Item #10F REQUEST BY SENATOR SAUNDERS FOR DISCUSSION REGARDING TITLE LOAN TRANSACTIONS - NO ACTION CHAIRPERSON MAC'KIE: Okay. The next one that I added on briefly, Senator Saunders is kind enough to be here to -- COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE: That ' s a great idea. CHAIRPERSON MAC'KIE: -- to let you -- to give us all some information about what -- the request that I have for the board today is that we ask the staff to begin the process of determining just the scope of the problem, if there is one in Collier County, and to what level the board might wish to become involved in regulating the title loan industry in Collier County. SENATOR SAUNDERS : Madam Chairman, thank you very much, and members of the commission. I think I want to thank you for putting this on the agenda today even though maybe next month would have been a little shorter meeting. I have some additional packets of information that I don't know if you have them or not. I distributed some packets of information to you, so I have five additional ones here if -- if it ' s needed. Page 142 ?Wit. July 31, 2001 COMMISSIONER HENNING: That is, Community Development Environmental Service on interpretation of C-4 outside storage. Item #10A RESOLUTION 2001-312, REJECTING CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY'S PROPOSED FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS FOR COLLIER COUNTY - ADOPTED CHAIRMAN CARTER: I will take that next after I deal with -- have the FEMA presentation. They have not -- I believe been here. I'm over an hour late on that. And I really need to, I think, do that issue and then come back and deal with all the other issues on the agenda. So is FEMA here? I apologize for the lateness. We need to have that presentation. MR. CHARTRAND: Good afternoon, Commissioners. My name is Gene Chartrand. I'm the FEMA coordinator for Collier County. Approximately two-and-a-half years ago FEMA proposed map revisions for Collier County on incorporated areas, City of Naples, Marco Island, and Everglades City. In reviewing those proposed changes in the flood rate insurance maps, there were discrepancies noted. Street locations, other things that were not correct on the maps. FEMA did, however, correct those requirements due to more inconsistencies in the maps. We organized a committee to review the maps and made a proposal to the board, which was approved to hire a study contractor, Mr. Dick Tomasello. There were areas in Golden Gate, Golden Gate Page 144 ads z July 31, 2001 Estates, that FEMA was proposing to take out of D zones, put into the A zones, eliminating some of the X zones, and the A zones were not given any elevations, which would not help the people out in Golden Gate at all. So through the committee, Mr. Tomasello has done 2D a study for the Golden Gate area and has come up with elevations and different calculations, and those have been presented to FEMA. We are in a process now where we are entering into an appeal process. We have asked the board at this time through a resolution that we would need passed that we are urging the passing of the resolution. I believe you also have in front of you an executive summary. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: I'm going to just interrupt to move approval of the resolution and thank our State Representative Goodlette for going to visit with Congressmen Goss who said that he's going to continue to fight hard for us. The resolution says it all, and I'm happy to -- I've been briefed on this. So if we need to have a more thorough presentation, I'm happy to sit, but we need to pass the resolution and send people off to work as far as I'm concerned. CHAIRMAN CARTER: Well, I'm going to second your motion, Commissioner Mac'Kie, so that we can continue. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Pardon my interruption. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I think we need a little more detail for Channel 54. This is an item of great concern, not only to Golden Gate Estates but to the coastal region. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: City of Naples desparately concerned about it. CHAIRMAN CARTER: And I think our position is, Commissioner -- and you're right. And maybe I can summarize this is that it's my understanding from the briefing is that we -- you know, we are going to support the resolution the same as the City of Naples, Page 145 low July 31, 2001 which says we are not accepting the numbers by FEMA, that we want our own data incorporated into this study, into the model. We are therefore -- want to take it to the appeal process to do that. We're willing to support what it takes to accomplish that and continue the efforts through Congressman Goss, Representative Goodlette to pursue and make sure that we are well heard and represented as we bring this forward because we feel that FEMA's data is flawed because of what they incorporate into this does not affect the west coast of Florida in terms of storm surges. If the surge is on the east coast, it does not affect us on the west coast, and we feel that this is flawed data, and, therefore, we are asking for those incorporations. MR. CHARTRAND: That's correct. Mr. Dick Tomasello, our study contractor that is doing the studies in the coastal areas where we're having the V zones extended -- which is going to cause an impact on the esthetics of the existing structures that are there. New structures coming in would have to be elevated well above those that are existing. And Mr. Dick Tomasello is here to answer any technical questions that the board may have. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: I have just one question for him, if I could. CHAIRMAN CARTER: Go right ahead. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Pretty simple one. Is there anything we could do to be more aggressive in our fighting on this issue? MR. TOMASELLO: Good question. I believe we did what we had to do to this point. I mean, we raised these issues to FEMA and their contractors. They began to be very cooperative, I think, a year- and-a-half, two-years ago when we started it. And we -- the questions we raised were directly toward the issues that they addressed in their restudy, in particular the wave setup, although Page 146 91 /2510 4�, July 31, 2001 there were a number of other issues that were brought up that would affect the stillwater flood levels, in that they pointed out the various things that made those elevations that were established back in 1984 and '86. We made those -- the point that these elevations were conservative for a number of reasons, and I don't believe that FEMA really addressed the issues outside of direct issues we made on the wave setup. The wave setup issue, we really didn't have any qualms with adding the wave setup onto flood elevations because it is -- it is a parameter that really wasn't taken into account in the original studies. The wave setup is an additional increase in water surface elevations on the open coast due to the wave action, and that's been well documented in the Corps of Engineers documents. However, we felt like the model that was established years ago in these FEMA studies may have already incorporated wave setup into it implicitly, even though, physically in the physics of the model itself, it wasn't represented, but the calibration of the models may already implicitly include wave setup. We simply -- COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: I'm going to interrupt you. I appreciate all that information, and I remember when we sat in this room and had quite a thorough, you know -- I actually understood a lot of what you said, which is scary. But my question was, is there anything we can do right now to be more aggressive in our fight with FEMA? MR. TOMASELLO: No. I think we've got it addressed to this point, and I think we've got the proposal in hand that -- how to address it in the 90-day appeals period. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Then I'm going to move approval of the resolution. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Second. Page 147 *ad& July 31, 2001 CHAIRMAN CARTER: We have a motion; we have a second. Do we have any speakers? MR. OLLIFF: Yes, sir. Actually, you have some FEMA representatives here who I think would like to address the board and answer any questions that you might have. Dino Longo is also here as your only registered speaker. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Then to FEMA I'd like to apologize for using the word "fight with." MR. BELLOMO: I was going to ask you about that. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: What I mean is -- CHAIRMAN CARTER: She meant that she would like to have our data incorporated and discussed in the process, sir. MR. BELLOMO: Yes, yes. My name is Doug Bellomo, B-e-l- l-o-m-o. I'm with the Federal Emergency Management Agency. I'm with the mitigation directorate now -- the Federal Insurance Administration and Mitigation Directorate in Washington, D.C. I have a number of other FEMA folks with me as well from our regional office in Atlanta, Todd Davidson behind me. Also, Mark Vieira -- COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Excuse me. Do you have business cards for all of these people? If you could give those to the court reporter. MR. BELLOMO: And Todd's going to say a few words after I talk. First, I want to thank the members of your staff and the board for providing us with this opportunity to talk about the new maps and the importance they play in local development practices as well as flood insurance for the folks who live in Collier County. What I'd like to do is talk a little bit about some of the benefits of new proposed maps versus the old maps. I think we've heard a lot about some of the maybe not so tasteful sides of the maps, but there's some benefits Page 148 g2cti ' :to July 31, 2001 I think are worth mentioning before the county approves the resolution that was just put forward. I'd like to talk about outstanding technical issue of wave setup, talk about the national flood insurance program in general and how the program works, a little bit about the appeals process, and then I'd like to summarize by giving you seven things I think you need to consider before you make your decision today. First, the new maps over the old. The new maps are in digital format. The old maps are in paper. They were literally scratched into plastic. That was the methodology back in 1986. So we have digital maps that can be used in your GIS systems today to help in evacuation and preparedness, studies to help in response, to help in recovery, and also to help you implement successful mitigation programs for reducing flood losses. Second, there are no more Zone D's. We've talked about Zone D and how they are going from Zone D to approximate Zone A without any flood elevations. We are working with the county, but the fact of the matter is, there are no more Zone D's on the proposed maps, which means the insurance rates for people who purchased insurance in that area will go down. They will be required to purchase insurance if they have federally backed loans, but those rates will actually be significantly less. Third, as was already previously mentioned, the road locations, the road names, the corporate limits have all been updated since 1986. I think that's important to recognize. Fourth, we've come to agreement on the vertical datum, and that is the base from which flood elevations are measured. We're now going to show both datums on the flood maps, which is going to alleviate a lot of confusion with the surveyors and the engineers and the planners and the other people who are associated with working with these maps. Page 149 4112Si(I/ 1 July 31, 2001 And fifth, although some may disagree, the methodologies that are being used to generate flood hazards in these areas are better than they were in 1986. And they are more up -to -date. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: But they may have some flaws. MR. BELLOMO: They may have some flaws. Although I would beg to differ. There is that possibility, I guess. I'd like to extend some credit to the committee. Two-and-a-half years ago we entered into this process, and a lot of those improvements I just mentioned would not have been possible without their help. So I would like to thank them for all their diligence. We are currently working -- I think Tomasello is working on improving the now analysis in Golden Gate Estates. We hope to get flood elevations on the maps for that area, and I'm optimistic that we'll be able to do that. Some of the outstanding technical issues; there are a lot of details. We just got a flavor for them a few minutes ago, and I don't want to get into a lot of detail, but it does boil down, essentially, to a disagreement over the wave setup magnitude. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Right. MR. BELLOMO: What is the wave setup? Dick described it. Super elevation of the water surface elevations due to waves propagating inland. There are really three main components to flood elevation. I'm sure you've heard this before. You've already been briefed. The main component is the surge elevation. In Collier County that ranges from 10 to 12 feet. The second component is the wave setup component, which ranges anywhere from one to three feet in Collier County. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: The surge numbers are what, again, one to ten? MR. BELLOMO: Ten to twelve feet. Page 150 912g(2 a� 1 July 31 2001 COMMISSIONER MACKIE: Ten to twelve. MR. BELLOMO: Ten to twelve. i he wave setup magnitude is one to three feet, and the wave crest magnitude varies, depending on L7 , depending on where you are from anywhere from zero to five. So in terms of CJ magnitude you get a good idea of what wave setup means in terms of the final flood elevation. I think that's important. We did -- FE MA did start adding wave setup to its standard ineiliuduiugie back iii i 789. in 1986 they were not part of the standard methodologies. And they are considered nationwide for all upeu ■ uaSL. So things are not different nere than they are in the rest of the country. if i earl sort of try and simplify the issues and express what I understand to be the issues that the committee has brought up. They bclheVC that anywhere from a nail a root to a toot of wave setup was what they're calling implicitly included in the 1986 study. It was not directly included. It's very well documented in the methodology that the models do not incorporate that additional consideration. But they're saying in how the model was implemented, it was implicitly included. They've actually recommended using a half a foot of wave setup for this study, and they basically derive that elevation by taking the 1.4 feet that we've recommended and subtracting out the implicit conclusions in 1986. So that's my simplified understanding of what the issue is. We have searched all of our administrative record dating back to 1986 and prior. We have looked at all our documentations, all our manuals, all those other things, and we have, quite honestly, hoped to find proof that this implicit conclusion was in that documentation so we could move forward. But we've been unsuccessful. We haven't been able to find anything. Nor have we been provided with any kind of documentation that it was implicitly included when it was run. So it's very difficult from a scientific standpoint to just take this , Page 1 J 1 965112 11111., 11 leira1 argument and run with it as much as i would tike to We haIrpn't been provided with any documentation. So really there are three thinac that fretrent tae i-;-(.,,, „n;.... 41,;<. argument. One is that it's nnclneumented 3eeunu, we v'e ;rad to cc consf..i.itatuts look al tins issue. we have VIYsni 1 iii 111Guiuus dllti appiitralions. w e nave nad Dewberry and ;.o.;;v 13 in i ciir ax, Wit./ V8,e iia v e had Baird look at the technical issues ul v ui v GU. ti11U all lilt ce of tfle111 nave concluded not only is wave setup appropriate_ as Dick `-i nmcaselln has already admitted today, 1 appropriate;1 l v .r�.L, uvLi1111.L�/t4 VV<A(A r but the results that we obtained are reasonable. So i think ifs important that the county understand that we have done diligcii e on this issue. it's not that we ma this in a vacuum overnight with a couple of people in a closet We have had three separate consulting firms look at it. of fAf RMA1V CARTER: Review the same data? MR. 3ELLviviv: Baird consulting actually reviewed what i omaseiio had prepared on behalf of the county and What FEMA, _ uui uiigivai siuuy and contractor nad prepared, and did that with very lithe guidance from me in terms of F E VIA at all. we just said here, 7 107 • 1 • .1.1C 1C 11i1J aiguinciit; here s that argument; compare the two and generate to a repot 1. They prepared ed that report,t, and we have that report CI iiiav1I. ;Ir. yuu d 1111E to UGC it. it's a. very objective study. And we did that partially' for selfish reasons because we wanted to make sure VV vv 1 on suuiid iechnicai fooling when we moved into the appeals process. The third reason i would like to mention is that the half a foot is not scientifically defendable. And that's important for the program: 1 �. I've 1 eect aouilu Nils stuff long enough to know that people argue the .a eieva€ions up; they argue trot down for whatever agenda they have on So it's important that what we put on the map is P7: s 1 .� Page 32 Ifts 4ei 1„1‘, sciemincally cierefidabie. And saving it was unnheitiv ineincleit wunuat any tioeurnentation is not a soientitic fArgnment. Dueiiv about the program anti how it works w IUHdJ 1-10011 insurance rrOgraM. It was created m I 9 . and it wus [-,,ast,catiy crcatect roi two 'CZ/SOHN. ihe Lrencrai taxpayers in the vnucu ,.-naLcs wet mem oi tooting rile nni Tor rnsfAster recovt-r,,r and iiyvvcrc tit cu Ot vvitkimig pcovie buixd ruldt m harii AS 'WiT\17_ The iuci ICeastni W11.S U2ez-111Se we priV11Te sector was not Dqvirpa flood ' dem; were gOing tinder suon d d till", refit ‘,‘,t-litlo rItE, tney 4-011liint 'ITtOrd to nay the They would PO hankriint And rri-e qnri IOOi Cti 17,,, pi CIL; uime. Ai he federal Li ill ilctit unuci wi nc 111C 11.00U ricx. ne lorql crnvernment agrees i„1,.....(1/1 hi t)a-o.c,-.71:tv Is, tut.-* ev 004: n ino,zo two mmos. so the 4.. 4,1 iii cji;v Ili:2'v affect Their duce r=iit'N, rqrio EneV allect nildirto- rrn'crices_ and that's imporiani: E0 t.1 IIKC to COireCt some misunaerstanctings. I believe, lust hased (in sonic -lac WSpC1 aftiic i c 'cad hell; localiv about the fiocui ptugi am anti insurance anu now it an works. It you look at the insurance proglalyi o aies. ,you et ciiiterem answers yUlt LOOK al a itdtiolld! scale, we re aDout even. I tie rwernurms that we collect versus me parytucuis we oav out over the 30 years the nrcooram was L:1311CCIVeLl is aoout even until Allison Mt. I That actually -- we may end Up having to borrow a little hit Cif 1-1141InPv i r‘q‘i 4:et-rm. 4-4-C r ciairn tnat are resulting trom that event. 1131ZI, n nette1rs o date vs,e're about even_ if you look hilt At r anima, over me me or me program or 30 years, we are about SX00 1:i1;;Ian m Inc flOiC. AfiCi tiiarS important because going from the .1gt7 7--Ae>7 In ix, 11 1(1(11 we IC eu, Lu i .iuuua itseii were about S800 million 111 1.11C: twit', 30 you can see II you were a -private combanv who on IV 1.1116e1 WIOiC Hood insurance in Honda. you'd he in big trnithip. \multi plummy oc nanKrupt Ana in court claims haTtieq Nnw if veii tOrlic rinxx7r, c■Ire.r, f find ont we're c,"? milflon lynx. -- Mitt you may -- on me suriAce. as a nrivate company. you'd say. nev. were doing real well for Ail uparc with Million. 1 rats oTeat. MIT you need to concider the fget thqt thp iOrida iS aDOUI :j) iU,UuU. i here are about tiin punt;ic.s In t-Ainici Loulay _ lItcorporelEen area .. II 4- nercent of wets Lu iliC a cialui in any one year because nt kniL; cvtAit, twu eveilts, titwe events. wn!--never tne case May he that iN #41nle. As a matter tit tact_ wnat 1tS 'Mk-en 7nil vparc vellerate ovemtf-r1.1- Ju:_lt, d punit Ot COIIICXL fkinson The ciamageg from A I licnn ilial We re oeifinir, me nrolectionc. are al. ahnnt ninnint, anu Lucy LO Dui into context wnat one siuiic ru 4,;(t(f (JO, ; S MMOTT,:iTIT to reCOml7e, tlif-)1 .2nc not to hace. riP.oicichnc crap.11, rr _„ f- ro ir wph Qite potion-1 rine is that the iiuod insurance brogram was tArdWil UCL:dUhr, we private sector wasn't irinKin.LT. any money on that's important to recognize. net c aim; are, qnnie rnisroncebtions about geiirig. instii-aficc all etly.ITICer. and insurance is more LtitnpnLaicu Wan any LnIng ve ever run into IlnderwritincY and the jiiirig aiiu ai inc utile! tinnus that uo into it. BUT the '1)M-0m line on ..:-.tditurcititcl Mg IS !Hai u you nave Main. m cnmnliance with the Lti (inn_ it yva.7) tit c.iiCLL WilCil VUU own.. you can use eltnes the *-1 July 3 1 . 2001 liCW iliac) OF iiie Oki map to rate your policy. i hat's an option. You LISC VVIIIL;IICV el IS more oenenciai. 60 i trunk mat's important to eii, the maps are &oin g. to be changed and nizulainic laws icl1C going to go up, are not accurate. You may not be rcqureu iü utsuninec now and nave to buy it when the new IlldpS Collie out oecause you're rinaing yourselt in a Zone A. where beiore vuu were in a Zone X bur your rntec chniiki tint riicincri. IT.C111 were Dull m compliance. iiKe to iaik a iitilc vu about nie anneuis Process. t nmer k,uunLy lidS Ille uglit 10 appeal, aria minK tnat's important for the at 1i111 is acivaliv coded. mm The IctICIell icguiuoiis IOF ine program. ine burden 01 proof will tall on ii uii .y ott it„:1 RI/ft_ LA,,H CL11.1A7'0,- 01.WTI De a T1131701" or t.11GBICc, wnai Inc courtly Will nave to uo is prove mat they are more I 001! t t‘,/tut,v t; VC Hail roonortunirres To Won:- wiTh arms engineers. DUI it can sometimes be ditticult to get them iu a1‘...L. iiwLfl lErclIrt 11.7E my UHITCCT r)F-Irfinse one mny stns cornnopent !Anil one rle Ctter 2t aiIj vvEtcli vu LH IL an 1(, t-Li1el-.. IL ( -1.n. ne sornerime-c: 4,1 rnt, 7. 77 Vf-s F3f-Ierl rinrtit-11 :ir r "4.1!..."4 thf:tt iNkL I VVOILI(ITIT S211 n ;1.-'11 5.--- 11 5 V 011. 1 IC1L I inmK th:rir .!-Ie11c-*T2!lv 14; .;z-nr1- t VU115)1- 'AT -r ! IL Di OVildeS 1116' el)11111-11 WuIn nr1 ,Aatit U!t*, htlr-ct or:A:du:se i can (Ion t !ooK IT r v I !crimiksthp-t-pic a !"!trif,,.:k 011 It III a IILLIC OR. i-age 41/1571ft I nni Basically, once the anneal period starts.. van have (-)f) davc to file your appeal and support your appeal with scientific and technical data. And we aniicmaie siarimg that Process within the next counie or weep to a montn. t nen you'll nave 90 days to submit the infrvrrnatuyn fr P‘c ciaititua ilr li-Nra-txTso ttt tb rlif- h70;c, forwPrd ic more corrpet i± : Could i ask von a direct question men, not mat I want to take you away from the direction vrtrere onino MR TAFT ON/1(1. T ThJith CON,' i SS ii. F,R it .F,TT A Atthicnnintintime IQ thpn. man that exists that is more or less final tor Golden Gate Estates? !lc L111 cift tia.) mut we nave IS oreitunnary. It went Mil in uPccemper or .1 ?:S. i nat map -- its my understanding vvOlicili 011 tiociattrut Inc Hood xiazaius lot mat area. xnu ii me timing is rignt, we may be able to utitiaire we i I L1II1H ;t S imput Lam to iiielitiOil, mougn, mat me maps Can DC revised at any lime. bcwtc iiev wezc C.:di yeti in PiUStlf,:: now they MT TIM And' at this point in time. we Ii ii rl et* kQTTP. ,a-r“r iii cli-r,-)t-sr.c. eNt 1+ 11-1,csv.4-, flnnd inclirqt-v-p9 "NCI. %-k_.nytivi1331viNnrs. k..A.J.L_C,1 I A: Ana mis nas been happening on a regular -basis BELL()MO: Yes_ There are a lot of different rppQrvnc tita-yoc go inio and try to explain n II you want. Hut the potion' line is mat we map mat you nave, your I 96t) map, is what's curieritiy ctieuve. 1-1116 that s wilat time tenders and thsurance atzents snouiu oc using. i ney snouiu not be using tnat preliminary map. - - 4M/a July 3 1 . 20(ii LUIVIIV11661iJiNtK tAii,t, I I A: I none all tne realtors out there ana an tne nome buyers are taking note of this. lit,LLA.J1V1.0: Iney snouuu taKe note oi mat. 'Jut at the same time i trunk tne nomeowners, the potential nomebuyers. and real estate agents review we oretuninary wan oecause ts imnorranr for tnem to see, well, tnere's tnis old man tnat snows us in Lone I/ lucre s a new mat) Mat snows us In Lone A. I here may he another map, and we could end un in or out. but i. unlit- Ludt. 1.1111,1111.ii11011 IS iniourtant wnen inaKinu LULL I I A: And it I understand you LOU, II we mar,' uoes mantle where mrs less ravoranie, anyone tnat now nas a dwelling built will he able to come under the um war ; r•ELLutymi: AS tong as tney were built in comnliance: ! null_ l_U1VIIVIIJ6IVINEK LULL I IA: Lomnliance at that time'! f V IN_ LV !La .,U1VIIVII1UIN tr.( LULL i I A: Ana wnen will mat period ot ","7:7-7! VV nen tne new man becomes effective '1. - "77 nomeowners wouiu De no worse on than tnev were hetore', 7:N1 'V! 'V! 1 ..! K.. ! !,~ • 1,.1:--1!! fr-IL.=, fr. th,, extent they were built to code. but -- t".. I:ILL, 0 .V4_1-121!!L. &in: I. nat s only one small niece ot ufl 1.7t.",=tic% LULL I I A: I understand. l'm lust tnring to 1%,;(..A ttly way klitit)ltit tug,nt. Y OU Will nave a constituency vviw till iU ict VC uJ utty 1100‘..1- 1.11.-2.1ll flOW tn.1.11 .l!ave 9/1(2 11111, l 1 /II! I 4.1 1 y wi 1• L-Iv a , 1 1 -r N 4a z iri YI t it\111 11Y°Y°1551 l!-.1••J I l, i 0-11I •1 rN Y1 L- 1Y" � r111 r 51'1 L i LJ . L x L*.JILL'J1 I ti YY LJ i.LU LLJ t: LYIV� LL1 V ILL L-ri311v 1l tJ1 Li 1L III L A.J 1i. 1's. and they now find themselves in an A zone. But if you want my sti�iS t y Fl• ! e ! opinion, it 11'1'1 i• to nave in cover* e v 11 r �'iLi Y v'�iasv�l. v�lailtrn'�, nL � i1�.;€)rLC'ti1�. LlJ i1LL1�li L11C.�.L coverage.vli�.�ir. 1 ZJLtile in a flood hazard area. And I would suggest, saving them $3 or $400 today at the exnen`e d S.tt`t_OU() tomorrow is not a good idea COMMISSIONER COLETTA• We were told there were differences AS much AS S2:000 A year° m nrerninnis_ MR. BEI,T:OMO: Between Zone I) and Zone A? t.,UI Ii I113Y.Jii.. iN1L1ii Y"1t it it: C CS. MK. H3LLLUM1 U: I here may De, Dut I would. Mink_ that it's r`lii-t r►:=1r in r`til`i ry F h 11'L n--n; i ini F.rd'.t"irirlitl rT i 11r -s i �� 1 - 1 Li i i we call an undetermined �t(iOO hazard. ,LL: 1.51:1t 'a`$o Lt uori L nave to nave s'e it ail: right �� iJi:L.Ju;�JiY`ir�o• ou don t nave CC) nave it its Lone D. Loo \vnaAt you're getting when you go to Lone A is the manuatorNr 1euuirerlient it you nave a iecieaauv Duckett not LLl Y. iILin c1ieaueL asLin!'. Li'!�+y sl' it'° 'y ii.,ruse w :1- depends "•t'1 wino ''"•3; ask, i l••!-•s1!''t °7.Sd'`c't tt vY hits Ii is v1 tii.3v . it ii.t� i..i1i..13 i)l;. 'vv iZV �r'ti i.l a.L Sis i vL`tl uJ t,al i.i.'c,#;i..7L ,.c-, : -=nom .' �:; ; ;- ...., °j:-n L„�1 ati.i: LtnL. a.:.a.r a.,=+..'Y.ta 1:5 1L�t.r✓xv i.:ai. /a v YiLa v w. Ln li LL• YY aA Vvw resolving,1'•Yl ST IL q'i, X° 9•!,t 53� ,31,rz 1 qg--��""r`3.:.r° "9 '.,,�.:`Yi"u Y°'•3R .S$'v consultation, fp a esol i Imz IL. 11 e can 1esoj i'a iL ri ougnn commu111E V . an 6.11L4.t :. ;b.r Lill Li&n i. a3 a.le l-:.�m.1 itil.Luisa L1Y l+..i YxYi,.J si. Y,.t1La.Y1 r'.,t i` U. a r 1•. a..a.L.a S. a-r LY...r1A 17 1t u'"• . V1,7•11.71•1 e 3 '31" ,r4 L-'Fi n-s;r t.;.-tY`Y :_.,v. -1-1` ?""-.:. 5.�..�. ..?'•..x iL LJ Y tiff11l a■ Lt3 LA AA 1x1 ti" ■§J6r 1111 i-il1L a)i.r a.s./1 x LL a a b m i.11 t P.I AA S.5.,Y YLi ti Ls,L1 i. i.L i,.:s li,. Y• A-0"A.a v 4.4 4.•••• i.i/aiii✓i.4AYY f . 'L3 i.xY+✓1.M.A.Y Y. Y• YL .d 1.41. 4.1 Y lbw'1 1.L.L,a.ii i.LA Y La Gi.Ill n\.• .•.:. } .-.�..� •w' +. ..ra a...s,dw.a+:g°s .wtie ..'a w.r n.� sr. yr sw >;.-. a -a nn<a,.a� .-e..,.. ,..;�.-. re L .. Ax .,.,'1115.5. YL k.al an 'Y..tx 1.llx Ylt.,SLY La Lx • v •Li Y• r a.i.Y.1 a.,v✓ Y.Yi xt1 Y.lYi i '\.: L11 isY Ld LxY✓Or.a1 i.. LY l3✓ Aka. i/4.4 Y■..,,,,AL4.5lis Y.iw ii V fill Y..3.Y Y.:.t LA. x.YLY•x Y. ir.E'sF1 La 4.,4\4'1 Yw Lax1 Li !• 5.. bi ijII fir, a-s�4.'w.ri4 ws, xa a•r-®yes; s♦ arm v f a.es .r..w}r sys.:avv-r m�av-.ice.: .-.. ✓�:.:� ....avnv -.ire w+ +-.-rte .,�� . L.•'i.1 YY.1 Laii pJxu ti.av Ll t✓145-4•_• v5✓ a., L✓tl Lall LwY it5111 A ♦ ai..Tv ti •xr1 1xiY"a p.1.1 i.Yix 44, 11 Y ALi • Y..Y5, x1+..3 illY.a Li tsll. i li1Lc rxxvxl it L it 1.2J 4,.416, SP•114,1 `V tr . .x u •s•x xw. +e. x.e�r e. -w..x e z.war,wet ♦YY r'a . ."1 "•vs�. Ys.. •771.77.,•7.77..r. `:.. ..ALL. P i\.4.a,+va v'1 t.AAAY.ix t+.1'Lx..A i L a Al ALat A tJ Y i a.6lwi`VVi i LY La A i�V Y i 11LAY x 1__,111w.., ILA AVV 11 ALA ►.l J. -3LL LiALai LJ1311AL LILL' L:ULAIAL F LLx1tA t111"," Laii.1 iL. Y b.+'ii L.a a.JUViiS.Y..Y aL.D - -« wl xax.a. St,Y 51..4 t< Y Y i4 Y .,. .,.111 Lli1.." t34-1 V'i`L.J Yv 111 1iail 'S. LLi mac 131.4••a3 L-kJ 1111s 111 11•.ULY i.1i •1xI.t L1 • L vt..1.1i Lw LaP Y'Y1 0.: Pt. - .+I _ - :33i _.+.SP a. •. - 9 l 2Sl/Z July 31, 2001 would then have to adopt the maps into local ordinances. They have six months to do that unless it goes to federal district court and the judge decides, no, we need to cease on these maps, but the default position is to actually move forward with the process. Before I wrap up with 6 ie seven points I frailtybf. an.'; az¢t,:�vax0.tacs s. asa, you should consider before you adopt the r°::o.7. w:v-, 444 --' r. . . . - 7.-3 - n'<I;.,t>r+ -re.T 4 e'a^ r-A':i ^a 7'''• _.. ""-- A9 - A.+A .-P _A. a. L A A.A au A --i I.A Ai- A<. AAA.s A VA. a.a AA. LA.% i,44#A V•4 A 4.4 a 4.44.5 V 4.w A 4144 46.;V 4Ai...A.4YA . A. :3 b as S4✓i 4_'44... a 74-: A F 1 wS A.+s..+ .s w+r x'4 5 w T-a 47 t�n` w 7.4.4....,,' u H.w+..'aT a., ,.x a a s A. <, u r.Y_.. .,4 a.x 4a v a. +-+ m v a,r a n a4 w .. -_a #-s.. A N A 6 r' W Y s i A e i A f ate' .i d A N A-f M .w l f e i A Y:.i M r' 4 f f A"' A 4 4 4 1 4 4 4-'4 4 4 4 4-4 4 4 4--4... 44;e A A 4 4 4 4 4. A 444^`x 4.4 s 4 e .1 1 i 2 i,:2 i/Ait As AY i 'A_.iaq Bra Ni Ft 4a-,. 'A 446.'YB iTA¢3AA, iw.1l l i j.14 ALA/A.,i AA 1 V1 iYJAA A AA.Ais i➢41.i..4. 1 Ali 443V A4444.'1 i . 0.+A A1I-T'-A-LJ 4 A 'JAA J Y. Y A Y A A.,AA=4.11YL'v• TTAATAJl •ATAJV AAA•IA I4' AJA ilLLI TO 11/99 A r4 F A.'J-2a-A9 AL. 44ii' aALLA 41 JJT1A41 BR'--+ llii1111 i4 1-3A., LYi4d 1z0 f.V 0-1 A.44.1 Y 44\.44 it LA AV* V-'aJi.i4 J'vl ♦ lvw Viii 4Yiv i.J As AA Al a v 'ti As ✓AFATA I-91 IAA d Ae1 A t} a 4 A .I•Ti..seF l 7.-4 ACA LAi LA AAAal Ti" LAS ALA 4 4 LA A A 4;JT e4Tld9 a# YSLAl l i B/LB.ATia A.)AAAJ a AA AAA.,A14.; Ae✓ AA...i,.I A4.1 44.1 vvt 49197 dl44+4.,..../1-v 11144;�I AAA 1w 41 i.x✓ A A A iJ.-..444451.0 4 i1a411 4 v41 Ai ii ii AAA.i✓ PA 92 9 A •#i' J A VS 11 A TS La A AAxsi a i T i l ` 4 FC .A T -JJ I T F a Yi-�lilm a ilulJ i it 444E 4411'V Ai 4.,AA YIi� i vtia ALA 0.D Ira . riia_, 41aIA. Aoit \J pJ I.\r. 4 14.e Y. v.>i a Y Iaa x 6 a A ;L::L A s I A A A L a r-V.-2 A."A T T'1.)ALA A W I L L'4 AS'SA d•a A T A AL IT A .a/A TWA,A T-A/A A AraaA n AA rx_.4 7-7,2,J,.. 1 Ai i. 1v 4Y'4 a.11'v o✓va/4 1Y14 d.J ii 14444 I2 w Sr"4Y1 A.VY 8AAAw., AA A VA a li. a it 444497.44 i. i L "449 ♦14 i 4n• es axsa-A, s .A VA* t ASA-+ A. LS •A a;us x RS" lib u/lau VA A.• i,cV4. a. i✓v .J i x .L4 A `io l.• L., A ft ft A.* we.. w.iir Y1Z a o I* A v v...S. 1.. “i iJ i.L _ SlT T1eR'A/A 7,rA 4x8. 79-,2 1. 27 491-7 A4 444..44.1 i. AAAJV43AA I. 54i14f4.. AA a 4x 4/44.w Ai/'4.J 44"4 5.J.4 96911.44.1 V.VI A.a•.44*. 4.144 t iir 0.3 CA.41 A.4)4 8411 ti *Att.,41 444E 44."A L# TA-4 .4:55.444 4.4,- T4 JAA 44.4 1 L A A:.Y d 4.Y J4J1 Arl f4 <_➢ arq'491•"'a PrA Y.1.q'q.-a 4.'3 4 \S♦, .. 41.1.4 44411 I 444 d4.. 44..4 4...,A,ddii AA At 44.4 4til4 ii1.A A.AL 1 AA 4 AVVA A1A.J A.4 A.4 i A A 4 A A.X 14 i i V.,S.e.. ® Sii64. i i }.< 4..44 A. ....fly., .a / ifq(2 0? July 31, 2001 Two, don't forget the good things I've mentioned about the product, the improvements over the 1986 study. You've got new roads; _you got new corporate limits; it's in digital format; it's in county-wide format, you don't have any more Zone D's, and the methods that we used to analyze the hazards are more up-to-date. And they are sound based on the consultants that we've used. Recognize that there's more than one outcome to the appeal. The elevations won't necessarily go down. They could stay the same. In some areas they could ao uni. it all depends on how the process shakes out. Sn I {1-,;.-,1r p ;, 4- L.,-.,, x..,,,. -�., <.. � . , M <„ , eJ i Li.in,,iiL i- + A+ ♦A.J 1.14+4,..A 4 4.A.4g LL Y4JV w:i✓:.A4!'.A V6.A L..L?Y A"La;Aa•:.s ...+,H.... ....k<..-w aria. >..._i-a 4444 444.--e.-a 3444 zti#:.-x.., r ..�'. . 444.3 LtIfl clo aria. iRR_).1U i)iamS etti i s I1 UL;i iii no i is ())l o/ outcome. , . +- a 1,.r' Ls c_ Aia.AL:"L4 "a F i A 2.1 5 i... t o I A.cAi t t S. 4.0.:six. Y. t.. A t ■a..c.t . a..LA. LA M Vt Li IL IC1.11. 63.:tw '• R"n . eY._ Bead # a-= A a-A F-- r s _..a &'F •5ti-pi .. i. Lrvcs��11€.i�a.i-114.3x3 aa.a�.I:s v11 �a�a.c� a,. �3a. a.A,. . rat, iaA'`�' 110 i. ��`.�,.:�_ a.�e,�bel��i..i%u ic.l •■,0.1,4A-a,..... a..I,..� ....aw..-::,, .�. ._ m..4.,4-44,4 4 , ..-_z ,.._.k 4...,.... a..4 .....n ri µ,.4: ._. 44.6. 4,.. . . _ ..._4,,.a_. :aeli ATSe :13A CT,-,r3d fPid3'3 : P 81:3'8+3R- Slilil DC `^r` iii ae:.i.L:l 1,...i �s; 1,'L r...iui tea.1i °s`'ii Ii. i111,1t,.1%4.111, {v'l1aAlV k.3r VV 11.4.4.1. Yv 111 Lt, t.__ ......... .r _ ...: _,4«.44 ...b 4..........:44.4...4. 4-44 1. . ......, 44.41 in... ,. 4 4..:.44 ,.w 44,4.4......A ,.. S., . .. ._.s.., 3"243...- r:-eP 3 -t'a A' F- e,ears. :-rasa 'all . pasi VvV0 `anu-a'i1Cihi Years. -i 4.1, 111k 311th .1 'all d0I u.alin.. 33 A"'1, -3 3 - " 3"' ..� 1aC i.% 34 d 143' 'r4R 'P - - 1via e 83443 8 1,-4 -r' 4.a.Ji.:iAli3ara.w-i u,::.0...i. ik,i iaa v.2„ 4.1.1. x3..43. v iiiii i.\, i.Y.0 La.,. YY e iee Y c a1 ut- ,.. . .._. > ............ ._ . _._......,....,. �__.... .�..�_ A.k_.... . �,,.a__.,_ ac....., �,L, 4444:1�. .. .� Y"A?-�r 1 1"'.:•3•_$ A s x•: x tile t"Si 6 :J e s s a T i.i i .e a Si,= i .x. 1111 01-La.i ril i.1Ya.li. the iYOLitYtl 1%'e.et i i..er Liia.at ,..1°b ri i. 3"3 .'P i F'I.E Z'T. a' J 334• u 3 'i': F-'3 a .-r A ST..- - ,_ a'^.'2'1,�i d "T-1 R'3 T i F:33 a',J-.1' 1,'\3 d F 3'l. -'4.14 4+-i' AAA. a.,i.J AAIJ a ia.aiiaALA. A Y..i+..a A ar i aa-i ii.. Ina- i.*0 a:1, ;iliW,it ..(Silt iAlc.v,i,,, v. ii,.iA aLiiL iUA.iA { i".1A1 A i.� f S 1VI}1,�i i la�A,0--,-'A `./ i.." 1 F �i G 11.1.1.43) kJ 611K4 4.1, iiiii•,%4.1' 4.,...fiV i13✓134.31 41.f 11.i34.iYli. istone. :5,. 4e Suva uro`Tesse vy e can [zY' an e t e ll'.s Y'9i: Letter_in 3444 4 334 3 3 444. <i v nave v 4143><v�►:er.J 43�.`4�. 1,'i v e..aii 1.litilaGC 3.333, i�i it;iVf'3 +1..7'�� 4.4`�a+i� �dl'l.i . "a ,. .. +.......... .,44......+.... «....a... ®........... . 4644...... „ .. ,. a.m .......+...-.r 4.44 a+.r a.1 4.Al c....a.aaa..a a. sv-✓4444 r-jza r l - de 3'l. 3'1 d' a 31, r A Ti re die reasons: 34-13 5 ..-.: i 8'Ze science '-i , i 3,71,-,,,,-,T. '-ii-. n a.aza: itis cna nge 1o1 l.i.ii'e.a il..Ta,ca.au ser ine. a:, iii iiii 0,. ..A`1,. 4444 F. 2'F i A l i A 4 i AL t it T t Aw,....,4 43 i 4...LA-.P 3.R A d.l i.1,.l 11 -. #=:,A .3 3343, 3,343 3.-4,74-3.-.4„..3 4a.- 3.3.is 8 L tiy:1 1,[ i.A YL_,i .-.-i 3 4,,. r ctitS/ July 31, 2001 flood hazards. There are a lot of different reasons and the maps change fairly frequently. This is not the "end all-be all" flood study for Collier County, I can assure you. And with that, I'd like to turn it over to any questions, but also to give Todd a chance to talk. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Should we Commissioner " Carter -- shouiti we SLICK to the live-minute rule? '7 7 11,1 7V V - Well, in all courtesy to 14 MA let 4.4.4 . .6, 1 4. 4.4-, .4. aas• .•,•ra. Se .71.fie y L R V• • • Ille111 IL• .. Li ",t/L)L: a 11_ Inert: 110 T: 477 - •a •. e 1, " r • , • •V f • •• ira ai Ps" : Ia a, a -C,r, 7.■ :IT, r 'aaraea £5.. I I le 11 5 3 L'6"7191 5 Te71 .c ■1..• Parr?... I Pa'7-re s ao a I ire 4. I Pri.dia al Ire Pr P. • A A A V LA5,5.A 14%. 1.3 4.4 V 1aJJ/11. A 1 LA 6,---717,1-.1T-r-,.. I-1 17.1, 7.2 6 6 Sis & 16& I•' L ;7 A T' 11 r VT 7 1 : trt 1111.T 171 T"71 IV:T.17-1. VT 7 T - a, r Par •sirs v se" se•aar se. • s s s • V/VetVAIL V-V. V Os.,aPP••• • -P •", •7 R" ▪ imasai ire are,si ri_ A A-.Ai Ai A.A A.A.,&a.. eir 55.5_a V ,LL A it A. V ...LI Li iv ILL L All.o • V V 17 1-7 41-71.-1,7 17111 Tr,f ra '7.1 • -- a a a. /....111..4 • 1414/ L.44.44 41444.444 V y e. SAP Pre.414 V AL. r• la f IF 1 5 a•ArAl arva 1.“-.7 as., S,aIJAA1.ALIV.JA1.ALA *.JA ato.s/Si• r•ea t a' 1 II 7 171 7.1T 1,7.71. 17%.717 7:1:7 'I T7;71 11,r71.771.1.:TT 1:a- 17:.7-TT :71 rrt 1-1.17- a_.• ,awe a•••se••spas y AL , .. V/ y 4.1.4 4.444.4444 Vo.V V V.IL W.-4. 11,1 •1* 7 7 • ,a ••7 v-A. a-7 r-a z r-a L-s-L I LL-r-y c" -r 7-v.A. L..Pal ALL ALL.. LAJ1 a.35. V• V kJ LA AAA A., AA Li JLL& AY Lb..' A. 1.11 ., 11-1 T C 4.,• • • '1.R. R IS VLISIIY.L.,41 ,tart ra 7 • • • 7 & 505,5 ill/5 45. 5 ilk: Psi 3-ffe a51 5 FPL. a•-• - it TIP"; ir-16 Lia %see V ...Al A I A V Li • A Cl I CIL:1 I I Li 1: 1 lat V.1° 1.",1 LI.T1€1 liT I 1- C'Ti T TI r.C.°01 I 11 7 a:2,17r«I 1- -•....,- - or" V' A. • y. • .4 AL VW • VW. V.0.1. V* VIO 4,4*-•-44..4. V 1.4,,4,4..V • V/4, • • •.1 • i 5 a • 44-41 a •alas, a a 7-771.-.7--. ..2 ars:; a ras-a ri1.2 3-1 3-11 e a a V-7 1 ....I 44 a..5.V, isi. LA1444 a. 5_•• 5..AAS 5_IAA .-5.sP Ai'A_ Li. 111:1 11,,f-zr7 17:T TT!: 17:7 T rt ,r:1 C TI T TLiI 1 r, TI C T Lii UT C •=1,^" C I 17 yy,y. .0 .16.1. 1.• 414.4 4y..444 .4 4.4,1 48.0 .544. 11. • • • A.IA, A.-, Ai AL LA Lia-..kik.ika • .••••A-Owe•..■• ,11.0 4•• 5.0 t •■•■a.1,J1-7.6-0 Iva .-■•••• la,Val,• ▪ ^ •••Lk •• •F•V•VevIll_ ■,• IN, • _op ay ye VVV, V VI V V • -V V a a ...ra ra 7a 3:"..1 Pat' car. ia sa - Arn ie...ti I. ....S 5. v A-I L.;.11 ki I I PA ire?• '1,1trr 22_1 rr", T TI C T'12. 7-71, 1.717.1_11/1:1.111T 3-1 111^47T1 I'll" ITi rrl 1 II ■-• •-•... •• A A • r • • -• cc a vAL a.; z -.4 1 if 1516 If 4 L,41:ss 7- -r: a al. ,raz 77.7,7 a a-7.7a vs.ra-s-. 5J L3 44, asaii• la_Liar Ire 5_41. 1.J Ai fl.. AAASaJIALAA 55 4445_A..) • A Li IAA rr :i 176'1,11.r (1,1^(111-1-.1.-n: ‘, I zr. 1-11"tr. rrt.z.7 Cl -1-11. 77-1.1,11-71.77k. , -a- --- 4.-1,1 1•V • •VS, •V leTs••t•L., ,,CST, 77.e TV,4-7 a.re 7 T-7 ern," •• "IY, ra r 7,1 e 77 let"T f7L. 5,• ,11•444.all i 6-1.41 PT a...." ALP II at 4.11 5 5145 IL,"4 -- i al 414.4 IL 41 714.4 4 143 , d r-.4441,4.44` fl L. .444.4.4 444.4 ,a _ - 9/V-ill 7 • July 31, 2001 policy of flood insurance -- can buy the policy at a more favorable rate, if you will, or the old rate, if that's the more favorable rate. It's a very important consideration in your determination whether to appeal the map. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: I just have to tell you, though, that as important as that is, the one that's keeping me awake at night y i-`. 1-4.1144:.:14-t.� 1 7 -,.'111'1•,/ 1 ^r.. i 1`z.--11-1..11r7 e T Irk 1 1 f-,1'1"111, 1.1 s : • 1..? 4.1 i.i1i66111 1ii11fiiv4-At-v uta, V ki 4..l Akilki VV t 4i1e ele�V ation for construction,• __<.� : t .# ,.:o`.,.1 d e t. 7-r east a! corm 1,. 7t:7, You would• j.� I 1 ' .'1 ",--,A11Y{3.AT 4 P'1^¢f_'x,-•.1't 5 ✓'£'TYC LS-"'¢ :-x t° 11t.Ok_ilt.4,L41 V -- k 111r.JA.Ai.1, s 'rs.:A.:xI L Lisa.k1,.. . ... .. . 4.:1.,..1.11.11,1 .. L.;4.. 4114-44 4 4144 v.s (1 r s xro?7 K4. F1.-...cs '4.1".-p,'a,-..-1,1.$.:x l+- !"NT ` .. /-b_,.1 As tr a 1.7..A.c. 'ka .'�. pAi.i Y .- A.4 ] 1Al..x 4441 A.4.14 4.31 A.1.4.4 AA A.%J V4 4..i 4.1 4..1411.1.1 V. 441 IAAL 4441 A.i.l. V V 4.4 U. - 1 1 '1. 1 1 '1: 1 4.A441.A14i 1. Z if-Iry F V T TT ar-!rlS T T . j 1 1 , ,1 . 1 1 T 411 1 ea .,===.1,-,4.3=,==- 44 7 77 1714 11'F3'Y;:t 1f r 1-1141.1174T 4.1 "10\11T R" .,1°A 111 1^1{17 1 >Y_.,3.7.4 ■4..A ✓'VA-A.■r yas w• 4-1 4.4-i+ 41 1.i4i d. 4 v 11.4.... 44.:4.4 Y V 444 4 Y'LY3l11./'1. 4.4 4-1,0 4.4.i. 111/1 Ld 11.5 1111IL. 4.A 1 . 7... P A -1.-4-1 f 11 11 . 1'•4. '111 11- s•* 1?^-...,^-t-,1^' Cs 4 , 1,--,--,a-q 4.' -^ 7'---^!,^!' .^'z t,1 4., 4•1-z 4 - r. -,.-w. T ^__1- .-..-- -. .-.---,,,e... r e 4.z- e-...- %-4- 4J1 I i.AAAAL.L4i 'Li 1.. 4.k i 13h..1L. 4.k k1}+l.r L.-akiii.°4:Y"AVA.Ai k. 1.VV 1f A.441. 1iA VV 11- -A LV 141L»`V 6.3i4 l,,LklBV 1 1 . s s ; ...-ie. `n. ti a I,i 1-!` 4 t r"s. 1 1.: q_ . 7/-4 Lit V Y:41.1'A P.T. f.4.-4#1,r4 171,A1/1- 6'/! 4,4.-1,11-11.1 1.4..11 1 a h � "4.r aeF Al L..Y�YJ........4.O..i- 7Y_:Y� x.951. Sii 1�3�. �J 4..b S. V 141 4.4 Y4 L.YYULYYGl.Y.iv. 41 4.1 1.1141111`1'.-,.. ., , s-^ _r.y'I `1 1 1 . * g- ¢. s 1 1.0.1111 el-rii 191 41 It `A3i r�:Ai Gil..41 1111-°4, tPF.li5 1 14.11--,4r/141s4.-1a `...a1111S11i 114 , , 1 _ a a . 1-1^"' -^+2^C:1-',;'1 1^1-v; 7'4'1 18�,3 °'.-T f,-,-4' s^,.^r-',�a",C^#.^ 1,T" ■1 1,°x 1 Ys,i S'■1?f=*s,-,is,fT s> 11.^0.ft 4+ 1 1<x^a n=!l 11411. 41 4.....4.4.111.1.11- 1./.4.64.34 A LL.IV166 114.A.Li614i.1 fV V A IA.TL. Li Ul ill l i X111111 C. CL 111111.1. I 111.i.SL ,. ,..,- Y!-1 F----S .IAt e F .1`! 4 ,.'4, 4 4--, @.■ S 4.9. 4 M Y--. F ,T, r 4-:-.•,..,3.e--4i, ; , r l x ,,1r t s>*-.r 6✓4.`i V 40.l 4l 41.o Sa.�i.a..S'O ...1A.p :ham.: 4S.A.3, . aY 11 V4V.ae ..,4..1 44 4.1.4rk4 4 34. 4.4.'�w0.4ii 1.11-1 4.13..1131.1 1 A 1 ' 1 1 4't 1 V T ?S >r1T 4.[1 ,T 4,-.1,-4". , 11‘..L V 4,Y Cl 11.1 C.A.,. 1 FTl T A T 71r 1-1/1,'T TT T 1 1 .1 A 1 1• .1 !1 F'711 V1 TT, 4 1..4.■Yl 11.* . I"(-1.,! sL`.IT(7�T!I1 TT'S 7l 11 L A S1PT7-1 V 1 .1 :1 t 14Vr#111.1 1 1 1 I I i V4. ‘.111.%I., !7,-,1 : . 1-4.--4 es 1 a iz e i V V %gilt July 31 9 2001 CHAIRMAN CARTE R•_ And my part. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Yeah. MR. DAVISON: Which again, the issue is, do you err on being more conservative when it's life safety, or do you err on being more esthetic? And that's a really comnelhn2 issue that you na-c.z grapple with, and I think we're very comfortable wIth 222.. AA AA A AA• A AA L.7.,A. v LI h... A AA AA A A 222.2V-22..A A A AO AAA Li tor A A. 4,.4_ %or I.* V - L rtl"\ - ---1- -:-"Y`rrrrt 47- ..,•. A A A AA I,. A,. . 11,a 4.4 A 4,, tt I 1 44.4.4. 7V Ad SA. 1.4 V All"14.1 I . f". _11_ s AAA. *41 VA; 22 V t•AA AAA.'A Art. A A A IA/■■.-/ ‘4.4- AA A 4- A.A A A A L...Ls. s s t , aa=ha- 4. a • 2•22. A A.•2•r 22 A A Ao A A A r A.A. A A • A A Ar A AA A. A A A• A A. AA • A: r A. I.,. v., • f‘ 11: 11 fl AT 4 r°4!T°-yrN fl r A A 9 A A AA A-A A.A.A.A 2 At L, 1+• •a• 4.4- hha ha....h....ch A 1 ,1 . 7 _ 1 ,171 ert 91-7 1 1 1 kr,4. 4. tuR th.0 4..4,• c.A A.., 7*-1 4-4.5 t 4.1 7.h-a h.„514.17 7. S a ahh. 4`a- `'7 1.4 .r7.7.7 r- •":7". "." 1 ^ 4" 4.'.`" 77.7.7 ^ T T AA*AAA 1 A A.*PA,Varr A.A. A 22-, • A122. 2 V AlA A AA **A A A. A A.A*22. 422. Ai AAA As AA A A A A A.*AA. A.A A A 2 2 V/ 2 I 1 I-IT 4 I •„ a_r 51554.1 vha h. h hhefah- ■•■■ o. Val, 4 7.1 AL 5, 1 I 14.' 1 1 1 A 1 1 • 1 tr. 4 *447.4451 LIA.45.A. .1 AL....1..1 .1.. 41.46171.■ h a rh. h.. h h.hh • "Alta_•lr 441 *41 / .L ALA A,6.11. A A 4-514.14-4-4. 4.16 5+,7. f LI LA,£4- 1514454... 4.A.as_ . as et it 9 • 1 1 - r/■,,I■ ha.,ta+oh 7.11.5.,411.•h..,LS h whs..5.1 LAhh.h r* 4- b. ■■•■ 4.7 7••7 7 7-47 f7,4:14,":7,r, 7-7 'ar 4 --,rs - •-■ a... a-a • a 54-7,55 4. A A A. AA v v 5.1 4. 1.4 si rs r-tt. • It yr Cl!X-% T h 5. t l h. A• r I.St 1.S Al e.4-c..6. A. 1.Y.a...a 7,a a.A.4.4 45 41 A 1 V .. • 1 1 • h.* •__ AAA A Al AA AA. h.....4.h.h. h AL-A AA a.47_ AAA A 2.22.AALAA AA A.A AA* 7,4 7, £ V. A AA 2* AAA* A Sr, A.a,. r-r 4..1-69.4.-1.14.10 All A AA .s51 AAA.A.A.22 1 AA A 7.11, /ca. 515551 N.,•■ a 7,545,4 4. r. c7„, 1 1 , -4 ,, 1 11 r. 1 - AAAAA VAL A AAA A.A.A.A AAA AA 51 hh.h..,hh.ha- h..... aa h h ha.51 . 51 hh..• 41.A . I S 11 417 4114141-0 411 8 4 `4.47" 8 81 ■18 is 8 4.1 ist Ai 1r-re `....11 • ./."7"al. R11. IfT 17*Cr 7 F'S T TN 1 fr • A7-'II V?V 1-, Cl 1 A • • • ° Al Ji -AI 57.45 4.5. .4.S.AA...I• 1.11./11.3 %A 744-04.15.J55 „.--•-9 71 . . 7.1, 14."., t" 11,7 7.4 111.1 T1 -A.A. a...a a* LI 747.55.7.4 4., v 464. I+ +J.. 74.A.Ill..'■■••5.1 _1 1 ° 74 r 514.4.. 1-11. 5. AAA AAA. . 1 r. 1r - , = „- .1.- S 7 7 7."2.77 S7,47.:7 1 1,*7=^71,7 7-7-7 7. ,1 AA A AA A.A, 74.4.A AAAAAAAA h I h.-,she h.,shah., hhhh.„ ha.... A-AA et,tr trettet Cs ir n t -- 1-71 r 11,CA 1- *11r-tint-lent n et 1 r rt 11111 4 CA lfr-ler Cret r PA 11. " r A A. tage n 1/Z42- July 31, 2001 FEMA, separate from FEMA, different -- I don't, frankly, see a great deal of positive benefit of saying the same thing to you that we have been saying for two-and-a-half years and hoping that we'll say it a way that changes your mind -- do I lose any rights if I don't exercise this 90-dav nrncess and instead go straight to whatever anneal is available? MR. DAVISON: Let me step back. I'm violating your five- _ rule, but that .11 11 assuming, because of the questions, you'll ii-CUOT111110ilaie 1-74`-; ,r1 1 j -On TY, -71 + IT 7711 77, +/77 CI 71 rs- r, AL. Iv ...I.., ar • V-0 7a V S_,11.Veaa *a a.V. t.4.7 VS 4.3.11,1*. Y.are,,ea a AL, %a aineo. I V.1. 1 JJCi UL .3. A C UNC d.111.1 me one we _ I (-4 71,c,-,-rt s 4-1+7 0,11+,1+,(NT," 1'1791 y Z 7 1.0 7 1.71,11 1T71 9 I 7-711,41.141tY1 1 9+ 19- . 4,1.1 1 3-,4..4 51. .4.3-A ,a •,1 4., 4.,A1 7,4 3-4., 3 V 3-Air,. V,* V V 2.3 1-7 11.0 Va.,SAL. A.4. 4.741 e t us. 11,I1(41 we 11 LiSeLl on i e)CSL SLIelFL:e anu ila I we 1-1 Avv-rev cv 4- IL, 0'7 7^a.7. .-- • * v.. 3-44. A A14.11-aa,a, Vas J 4.1-, S.,SVV. AAAV.. a A. .a ‘?..“ * a al- 54 a 46,a. •a S. VA fa+ - 9 • V Iii Li4..)11 LI I. IS LICC lUeLl U0011. LlIell e nave one approacri wouiu Pe 1,7+,VV ,711--, 1 7 7,717 7 71 I 711,C1 fir raery Ilar 4*. a i1 4...aa a a a...1,a ea V ea,M. 4,4.1 fiaait ea, ism.4 ,11.44,11 V t541111111- Ix; t h 0-- I,V.4r4 lii V.f' w. 71117711 ,9,x-- 4 .4 1 47-111,11, 1179 V I IVI IVI.13 3 PUP iN r_111. vv tact]. is a process 11141. I very T 11-1, ,ro i-Nct el r.+1.1 7 11 7 Ike*Vt4V VT 7V rvl rrieN -.L.A....L.-AL. A.A.-L.-ALA,A.L-A V.4 ALA AA53-3-A.4..A . 3-a3-aaa1A. Via Val Giniiel era 1.a.t.11.41.,,4.4. V 1 V V%?/A.*a+ *V 4*-V. 4.4k L y - MO UM). Dani011 Mile Interrumion. Out I US VV all Led LO Sa at. lk D ilANTIQrm;• A In r:V1*. r, 411, -f- —11TV. h.." • a aa 5.11'Yd.a ai 4.-4, V.6.1a, a./ in 'in 3-54.3- 4.1 la 1 A., 1 4.,Lb 4 4. 4.,.4. I ta, .19! 4 ya ut ti It:LUZ:I 1; - - —th - L1iflULJUILV c."1 ti LI Li L'Ul. IOU MilliLe MiliS 10 d ?1.,7"9 4 tt:717. 4 1,01,1 f t7 771,7 7,7 vt-r-si 11"1,, • " V . kJ III ie 1/1-alikl e tilt)U Ill \`-;:''le FI II i a "kr% 7,7177 1-7-174771 Te-777+' It+er“,-(71 -4 V "ea.-la. a lea•aa V ■aa- *a 4 .41. I la.4,Y..44.4. .o.4 .4e, a a ay."... e a ea ea. to,a, a. V V V V V: 11 V VVi V 'era I al r I a all/1 1AV e rhyt.'erl I 42.11:121-.1eU 0111- Min(' Dasea tin Irv, 7.777I, re4 TM re,1 car. Ye 1,.c,„4 44%rs., .LVVV V51 .--„ V V a A a., Vaa Vi V 1 MI If'eV 111(le (1-.11i Lir) • 11111i Ve IOC V. 1, I Or I C..)1.1'`VC I a V cr5.71 7-4-ft, r;v-r.,7 17,7 /4, 4-t 47,It 7-y,.4 a-- ;+ - -; -; , - ▪ tata. Va.a la,a al a Na4.- Va a a 4. eat-• a a ea +ea,.a a.oa w W.../*V- ea. • ea .4,44 .?e't I 1.t.C,ea I 1- IT as 71 It TV t I it re III elettere tt., V SI LI"LIA.,11 Vv 4.114A t, 4.116.-tkA CIO L) 1.41%, LII 9- (lily 5._I11 I L 11-• eat ie. a*_.• • ci(t5ht July 31, 2001 COMMISSIONER HENNING: Can you identify those three different groups, those four different groups for us? COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: He did, actually. MR. BELLOMO: Yes. We had Engineering Methods and Applications, Esthetic Contractor, Dewbarry & Davis, which is an engineering and architectural firm in Fairfax, Virginia. COMMISSIONER HENNING: So these are not individual and not government agencies. 11/112 RP] I flkAll- TkpcP ark-, nrnratP onrnylaMpc anri 1 . rd ,anel Associates. rT4 A TR NA AN CA PTPR- Cnntraptpil hr PE N/1 A COMMISSIONER MACKIE: And we contracted with one that agreed with us. LHAIKMA1N LAK 1 EK: w eu , Mr. wmte, can you answer more directly Commissioner macicie's uuestion.! Atm. W Ili certainly attempt to. Assistant Lounty Attorney Fatrick W lute. I mini( one or me tntngs to keep in mina is wnat mr. bellomo had said with rev:arc:1s to those three avenues. but bore vou Vlet mere. tne ming is ne inaicatea tnat -mere naan't you F.UitiCient ripmnnetratinn the ortirrvhi'c nart x11th rpcnprt tn nnp nf tho technical matters. UUMMINNIUNL.K. MAL:1UL: Kiunt. MK. w tit IL: I mini( were going to De arse to incorporate a mnrP nreoi CP ancwPr intn what wPirP tinincr tn nrewirlo COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: So we have new information to snare-! MK. W t: Dy me ena 01 -- not at tnis point, but by me ena of the 9U-dav window. UKay. . .v.; 71t4g July 31, 2001 MR. WHITE: That's what the second element of the presentation to you today is about with respect to Mr. Tomasello's firm and bringing them under contract to, if you will, get us the last step in this process, which is to create maps that we can then submit to FPMA so that hopefully we'll have met the threshhold to demonstrate that. But regardless of whether we do or not to their satisfaction, I think we still have at least from what I've heard you say, and the other commissioners, two opportunities; one through the community consultation process to maybe meet some mutmutually aeacPta' 1' and., pot tbrou :h that then mediation or accommodations, a.cs d., q�vYilu.p✓ , xl pot a 1 - 1 , then ra s<*1^1 v -a$b # ��w i r t at.9v'Ara ate a P Fpr +I-14a r.,1404N Tri'at? a.x 4,12 a n.in a 3.r aa.YO.1 al..'ael Ora l4.t a.0 3. 41S..I%. .t v I 3A.5..a..'1, vi. La ia.. V5.i)v I al L.i 1 ,e don't think well 11-rl0IXT '�t'2 t--'• °.FYT4..'+i,Xrer• to; those�� ,"',gr g, `, I d3311 L L 1111 xl x11 }SJ♦9 LIYV 5.4 1aF♦I M1 54,.° 4.13a.+�_F a. iE¢.-£V._. '1(°1 F:i k.T fi r"1 r"1 t f? a C^F`;a10 t-,.ate' $tT 1Th 1s'Y'a '1 a e-'�-a 1 a- 'r, -i F F-n<_re t a }#' .< . s. 5.1 C.'L C.LLl1 I ♦ .,7 4.'ai Lx 1*..: ti:i.'A.4.r t 31.-3-.. i.x 13.+c .e..-1 4.a a.., '4-" &v.m. w ,v+•_.. .'e *.. w..., r�- r%r i,.v .:sv-gS of this a�-76 to 1p +15p jj1='3T period [A?P�t'P 7• u- 'nave 'nave end i this /0m Yo i .1`ua♦ L/ex iod i'Y a re o1n G. to 'nave e to 11[4 e "C7-- - z ,911 +11;k7 iICt # ,3 ire -i o,t-43,11-4:, #ham j3.TT�.gag'�`Y. .c.,x111 i.&s.sm xi. a3-1 a.a ailil. CY.11.d7 1LYe31. ii t4pl N.1.1.4. \r'1'L'L.LL'i� Lx1L mai.is..-� ,�� T �ryT^� TT * ,{ �^y T�y�-+ T 7 CM,M,.4 01 c°40 !B Y i'!T k�-� Fd' 1, A i 'fa F . P ,11 TP, ak °"[7 7 F=acaf r, fear - 3-_f 1♦it F L11J 511'L.,'1. 1 x_,li 1Y 5114,..' 11111. a a a L4Y V LI 1.4 a4 .aa a. 'LP It t'I a. s%tr. Tomasello TE,4 ? (yT T TIGT T1,fa 1l.ATr Trueatncal1(- °c, r rery T Tem1,r1 cA�11 1♦11.\. v5./1111. 1 « T! llx lv 1♦11. 1 i/1 x 1µL1 v11V a) Y.'VL 1111}... 1 1y tJ 5.il\A 1V'�11 very comfortable. thouuh. if we were to eet some written description trt rtroti of _._ 11hr 1-1‘,. J hn�rso ra r=gcea thg4 T r4-tr+ t3ai r. try -� rre+ T La.f Sall L V V L 11tI1 verve-pi 1a1.11 ♦ • L/V ail I.V 1144 i.+ 4.4. AI LAo.9 W 1.1 ‘4.1 1 L4A110:' L'"st is L.°X.x a.L. A.. nave 2.TOt to have demonstrated that I have exhausted our °- co-Nil fTc 'Tn?Z.TPT7 - AA;r"V S,. Lai�1/411ET 1 w 1_.11 igtigAL A'i_5..,114.5. 15.1 Li1L. F ''p �j g, * -'V .5. . �j-'_a ''1.l F. }"' Cs.di.f lji111 aTtra. i V S, remedies. i �`4 Y-L7.i ii t.%1 I11 yi['ie sure; t1,rmt T '►'2reatcar't ra4 tr + 1111 t#1F te, -aa.A "f11 ea i ra �E'e L.curt P,' °Ses •e'if Is e Ceb`.' f�• 5±1'�15y4 5. 1 III V L V ar'L V a.41t' SL 51111155 L'a..P not 3-. 1 5.y LriJ {/"'a' 5t O s_6f_a}LA).t 1:,A t A_.'L+1�13.1` N 5 3-.remedy S,11 l 3-I sI Ci.. 4.1.8 making sure that 1. have not. forfeited some administrative . /� 'A BOYS t'!9'.r F-Ya G" e'4 I +1131+ I e^a�csf4 earl fra '°]i>f� f"s)r,a ea A ra Ras/-s1 11 fl 111,41 3aa ir11 to Ll a.V as 3A 1 5.113-la 1. ili.' a 4.AV'5..4. 5.V Lii15. . 3..341.V ill. 1 5.111.1 7l/ 1 V V V LA 15.1 11 Ii.N 1511 our attoiiievs' off'ce to work with r if Vu\. to make sure mat we nrotect ice V 5. ♦ 1 1 ♦ YI 1 1♦ 1 5. make sure mat Y♦ L V L t1"A'.'tt Y'9 r1C'7 tT fart 3-11541. 4.6 V 5.81 3-1 it 11. rage Soo 925/,2, July 31, 2001 COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: And that's exactly my question is, frankly. But before you go through there, let me ask Mr. Tomasello, are you producing new data? If we go through this 90- day process, are you going to get some information that they haven't seen so far, or are you just going to plot the same information on a map? MR. TOMASELLO: No, ma'am. We're actually going to be producing some information that we can present to them, whether or not they're going to look at it or not. No. I wanted to clear up some misconceptions that I think Mr. Bellomo presented. I was really kind of set back by some of the descriptions as to what went on here in the past two -and-a-half-- or year-and-a-half, at least. He mentioned the fact that we came up with an implicit reduction of wave setup that went from 0.4 feet to 1 -- one foot, I think is the range -- half a foot to a foot. I mean, that was not at all -- I mean, there were never any numbers attached to this implicit reduction we're talking about. We were referring to the fact that the model that's used to calculate storm surge may implicitly already setup TI..7e,^ a.] df't even say it absolutely did, but it just goes to common sense that if you're turning knobs on a model. -- and that's basically what €3'i 2n e'a.L= with ..:r93 l a ls t m coefficients and exponents in the model -- you have to turn the knob k n ob ' t 4_1 ,4 t Snatch ( L was actually L s e r 06 . A r T don't know_7 how many FEMA studies have been done along the At9''ntir. qa'! d Cr-10f " �".€a'�F '0kF 4- m""'rk €`�a --' .`c'� ?y_ .ti :w b r ,., — .4 «-t 1 %v./u11414 i.d.i l'i.a. i...4 44 Jr.l �'tl>43 i. L)4. KJ a."s s- 4 4 k.. �..a't:c1' .x v v 4 4 4 C,.'.a 4 ..r 4 — .w 4 L(A �"v every one of those. at least that I'm aware of have had hind-cast t.!Y u l-te 4 with a model that they set up to simulate the coast that they're looking at. And nd they'll go back and look at the storm C11r4Tes t nt wet-P. crr^. ged ERA? k - Heel_ a that a r �,ttc # # w lJ SA14,4443 4.144.4 i. F443.44 44..44.x4*3s.a 333' a. 44..=�.. w...%i sd 4F e.�. a4.4 a. ..ii`+.. 3.9Rb.e T .. .. S me area. rage ioi flak 2- 7 July 31, 2001 And in the case of Collier County, we only had one really that had any significance storm surge, and that was Donna. And we turned the knobs and got the water levels on the inside particularly to match, because you didn't really have much in the way of open coast flood elevation. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Uh-huh. MR. TOMASELLO: They matched fairly well. There were a couple of them that there consultants pointed out we were a little bit low on, but actually one of them was down on Marco Island where wave setup probably was the culprit, and we'll concede to that. But the other areas back inside Naples where we were right in the range of observed flood levels, according to their calculations, the setup would go -- well, that's another concern we have. The wave setup would be unimpeded going inland because of their assumptions were that the setup -- it was inconsistent from one place to the next within the county, but, for example, on the north end of the county, their setup projected straight on in without any attenuation. And we -- again, we didn't really object to that. We just said, "Hey, show us the documentation." Well, that went on for a year, and we didn't get any documentation. Finally, it was produced, and we shot it full of holes. We said that this doesn't make any sense. "This doesn't make any sense." So they went back and regrouped, and they had their consultant. EMA. produce some documentation finally. And it just went to show that they didn't calculate this stuff. They hacked into it. They didn't have calculations to show what their setup was. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: We know that much. CHAIRMAN CARTER: Okay. Look, look. Here's what I'm hearing. Let me see if I can cut right to this. We have an opportunity, Mr. 011iff, to take all of this, go through the process with it, ana tnats wnere we want to go, ana tnars wny well retain you to D. 14Q art July 31, 2001 get that done and present it and take it forward. And I think that's what you're asking the board, and that's what we're supporting, and that's what we want to do. So unless there's some real burning question here that gets outside of that framework, I just say why not do it. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Well, that's the way I started, but then after the speaker -- I'm sorry, I've forgotten -- didn't get your name -- but he made some good points. And if this was a wasted exercise of 90 days, then I don't want to go through it -- CHAIRMAN CARTER: I understand. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: I'd like to accelerate and move beyond and go to court or mediation or wherever we have to go. But it sounds like we, in fact, are going to, and I trust you're to be open when you receive the information and that you will consider what we think will be good data, good scientific data, because our common sense -- frankly, every now and then, you know, scientific data and common sense come together. And common sense makes us believe that those maps are poorly, inappropriately drawn for our community. And I can speak strongly to the coastal area that you can just see that it's not -- it doesn't make sense. So I'm going to restate my motion to approve the resolution. CHAIRMAN CARTER: We have a second to that, I believe. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Yes. MR. OLLIFF: Mr. Chairman, you still have that one registered speaker, Dino Longo. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: He's here. MR. OLLIFF: If Dino's still -- COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: He's here. MR. OLLIFF: Yes, there's Dino. MR. LONGO: Commissioners, thank you. A little bit over two years ago -- my name is Dino Longo. I am the vice chair of the Page 169 'Vide July 31, 2001 Development Services Advisory Committee. I am also on the Citizens' Advisory Committee for the FEMA Study Maps and a number of other committees. A little over two years ago, we started our Collier County Disaster Recovery Awareness revisions, our coastal setback revisions, and our flood ordinance. At that time we had -- we saw the proposed maps come out, and we saw basic map-making mistakes. And I am a layman; I'm not an physicist; I'm not a hydrologist; I'm not an engineer. And it came to question -- if basic mistakes on a map, like streets being in the wrong place, not on the right place on the map, so forth and so on, could be made, the complicated issues of the methodology and calculations might possibly be wrong, especially since we were looking at additional 1.4 to over 3 foot of increased elevations. And as John Remington just pointed out to me, that ten-foot flood elevation on Gordon Drive at eleven foot where his house is, with that additional 1.4 and the change of datum, places those houses up four additional feet. I can't get into all the specifics and the mechanics of everything, but you asked to pass a resolution to go to the appeals process. Over two years we've had a board of advisory citizens; engineers, attorneys, hydrologists, insurance people, mortgage bankers, all of those that are involved in the industry of how this affects our community from having homes that are 20 years old at this level to homes that were at '86 at this level to the homes that could possibly be at this level. It changes the topography of your community, as well. We're not asking to fight FEMA. What we're asking for is to do the right thing. We are charged as a committee at the Development Services Advisory Committee to try and do the right thing for our citizens in our community. And what we're asking is a better Page 170 42412- ..:1 July 31, 2001 process, I guess, than what we got. Obviously, we've butted heads. We've hired Dick Tomasello to refute or at least look at similar findings. His company -- his firm has found some, we believe. We wholeheartedly on the advice of our committee and asking me to come up here and speak support Mr. Tomasello on some of his findings. You do have the opportunity in this appeal process to go through the communications to start with. At the very end, if heads still butt and we can't find a common ground, then, I guess, it can go to court. Obviously, we don't want to go that way. If flood elevations have to go up in some areas of the community because the methodology's right, so be it. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Amen. MR. LONGO: If it goes down in other areas, so be it. But we want to make sure that the methodology is correct. To this point we don't think so. I have to go to another meeting so... CHAIRMAN CARTER: Thank you. Any further questions or comments from the board? I'm going to call the motion. MR. WHITE: Before you do, Mr. Chairman -- I apologize for interrupting. Again, Assistant County Attorney Patrick White. The thing that I think to keep in mind is that staff is going to infer from the approval of the resolution and the approval, hopefully, of the proposed not to exceed 67,500 for Mr. Tomasello and we're to do a cost sharing with that, the other jurisdictions, but the thing to keep in mind is that we're looking to take direction from the board today that we're going to prepare ourselves for that point in time sometime down the road, 90 days, 120, whatever it may be, to come back to you once we've had the results of that study and then ask you to make a final decision of whether we're going to submit that or not and at that point make, if you will, a determination whether we're going to appeal. Page 171 14(2 July 31, 2001 We have 90 days to basically come to that decision once the window opens. Before it closes we have to make that decision, and we need to come back to you for that. And I suggest that -- COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Why would we not submit the information after we've accumulated it? MR. WHITE: Well, we don't know precisely how it's going to turn out in every detail. And all I'm saying is that if there's any comfort level for you in believing that we are going to give you that information that validates making a choice to appeal, let's await that date. CHAIRMAN CARTER: Well, I think what we're saying to you is we're going to go the whole nine yards, and you can give us report and where we are, and we don't -- MR. OLLIFF: The worst case is you get information you don't believe justifies going through the process, and if you don't feel our case is strong enough, then you would give us direction not to proceed. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Okay. Good point. CHAIRMAN CARTER: Okay. Thank you. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: So I'm going to modify my motion to incorporate the items that Mr. White just described. COMMISSIONER FIALA: And I'll incorporate that in my second. CHAIRMAN CARTER: Thank you. I'll call the motion. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Aye. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Aye. Page 172 j'S`c2 July 31, 2001 CHAIRMAN CARTER: Motion approved 5-0. Thank you very much everyone that participated in the discussion. Reporter, how are you doing? COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Could I say something quickly, before we break, that we really do appreciate FEMA, all of you being here -- COMMISSIONER HENNING: Very much. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: And I think it's a really good sign that this is going to be some -- a way that we work together. And I apologize, again, for my "fight" comment. CHAIRMAN CARTER: We're going to take ten, and we'll be right back. Then we're going to move to Item 10 -B. (A break was held.) Item #10B COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION PROVIDING A SUMMARY OF A PREVIOUS INTERPRETATION OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SPECIFICALLY AS IT RELATES TO OUTDOOR STORAGE AS A USE PERMITTED BY RIGHT IN ASSOCIATION WITH A PRINCIPAL PERMITTED USE IN THE C-4, GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT - STAFF TO REVIEW CODES REGARDING ACCESSORY USES TO OUTSIDE STORAGE AND GIVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE NEXT LDC CYCLE CHAIRMAN CARTER: We're live and we're back in session. We're at Item 10-B. For those who -- we tried to take it earlier this morning but were not successful, so we apologize for the delay, but we are there. 10-B as in boy. Ms. Murray. Page 173 October 22, 2002 Item #15B DISCUSSION BY JOE SCHMIDT RE APPEAL OF FLOOD ELEVATION MAPS — TO BE BROUGHT BACK AT THE NOVEMBER 19, 2002 MEETING CHAIRMAN COLETTA: What's the last item that we have? MR. SCHMITT: The last item -- for the record, Joe Schmitt, administrator, community development, environmental services. This is just an update on an issue that's been around since December of last year. And it has to do with the appeal of the flood insurance restudy proposed basin flood elevations for Collier County and the City of Naples. The flood map for Collier County and the City of Naples. And I'm going to provide a brief update of where we are in this, with the assistance of Assistant County Attorney Patrick White, who will answer any of your questions. On September 25th, 2002, staff, along with Bob Devlin of the City of Naples, and our contractor, Richard Thomasello of Thomasello Consulting Engineers, TCE, as they're known as, met with Mr. Doug Bellomo of the hazard study branch, federal insurance and mitigation administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, and his representatives to discuss our appeal of the revised FEMA flood insurance rate maps. In sum, the letter that you were just given that was addressed to the chairman, acting as the chief executive officer for Collier County, stated that TCE's methodology was not superior to the methodology of FEMA's contractor, and that TCE had not validated that the FEMA data was technically flawed. So what in essence that letter says is they have denied our appeal. As a result, on behalf of the City of Naples and Collier County, Page 257 eiftSid October 22, 2002 staff is preparing a letter of comment for the county manager's signature, which will initiate and trigger the next phase of the appellate resolution of process that will require FEMA to respond in writing to our comments. So this is the next phase, and we'll be doing this jointly with the City of Naples as the one Collier County appeal. The City of Naples has expressed interest to meet jointly with the board and to coordinate how to best resolve this appeal. And the city manager has been in contact with the county manager, and we're trying to set up that meeting so that both the board and the city council can negotiate as to how they want to proceed. Based on follow-on date provided by staff, FEMA has expressed a strong desire, and I want to express a strong desire, to work with the community to resolve this -- the methodology and the associated flood insurance maps. I think they would rather do that than go through a lengthy litigation. This is certainly going to require additional financial commitment by the county and the city to secure TCE's services. To that end, staff will provide a detailed briefing, and we'll come back to you with an analysis on the issues and the options, and we're going to schedule that for the November 19th Board of County Commissioners' meeting. So that fundamentally kind of summarizes where we are with this. This is a long and ongoing process. We appealed. They did not recognize the data as grounds for the appeal. Now we're going back, initiating the comment period, which will start about an eight-month process prior to them, them being FEMA, publishing in the Federal Register that these maps are valid. So we're pushing the camp further down the road so we don't get into issue here. And my commitment to you is come back with both our contractor and with any -- with some of the support from the city as we try and explain to you where we are with this whole situation. Page 258 y/ifr2 41 October 22, 2002 MR. MUDD: Commissioner, what this presents, what's happened with these new maps is there's areas in Collier County that they've designated on their maps that would have to carry flood insurance that don't presently carry flood insurance right now. On needed flood insurance. Because we have -- in our opinion and in the City of Naples' opinion, they've got some faulty data. And I think we've gotten them to understand what it was that caused them to come up with a bad conclusion as far as Collier County is concerned. And we're just trying to prevent people from having to have flood insurance when they don't need to have it, based on maps that aren't correct. MR. SCHMITT: Let me just kind of piggyback off of that. Frankly, we're really talking about a lot of homes in the Estates. And what that means is that if you have a federal loan -- which 90 percent or so of them out there are of some sort of another, backed by a federal agency -- you will receive a letter from your lending institution demanding that within 60 to 90 days you initiate a flood insurance for your home. And the only way they will be able to dispute that is through individual appellate process through FEMA. We're going to delay that as we begin to try and convince FEMA that their data was faulty. We'll need TCE's assistance, and that will be a joint effort between both the City of Naples and Collier County. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Mr. Schmitt, I hear you. And this is indeed bad news. It's totally unwarranted. I know the study, when they did it, they took land that was far removed from Golden Gate Estates, which had a much lower level, and flooding was much -- would take place there at a faster rate, and used that as part of their model. I thought this was all cleared up. Obviously the problem's still there. Whatever we have to do to keep this from happening we have to, because the expense and the burden on the residents of Golden Page 259 901a- October 22, 2002 Gate Estates is totally unwarranted. Also, too, is there another way that if this does become fact and we can't fight it any longer, we exhausted the appeal process, can individual lots get exemptions from this? MR. SCHMITT: Yes, there are. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: And would you explain that, to maybe take some of the panic off of our homeowners out there? MR. SCHMITT: Can I -- that's a little more detailed legally, and I'm going to defer to Patrick, if I could for. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: And then we'll go to you next, Mr. Carter, and Commissioner Coyle. MR. WHITE: Good evening, Commissioners. Again, assistant county attorney Patrick White. There's two processes, and they're both set forth in an e-mail we've received from Mr. Bellomo October 10, indicating both their apology for the mistake with respect to what's more commonly referred to as the Sheet II-D study for Golden Gate, as to those data errors. And those are things that will be number one on our list of comments for resolution with FEMA. But the two processes that are available for property owners, those that may somehow, even after we've gone through and gotten these data corrections, still be required to obtain flood insurance, based upon their elevations, there's a process called letters of map revision, and also letters of map amendment. We're going to have to look at how many of them are remaining after the data are corrected, and my belief is that many, many of them will be corrected and there will not be the need to have that level of revision by either what's called the LOMR or the LOMA. So we're going to have to wait and see. But we already have this e-mail from Mr. Bellomo at FEMA -- CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay, so we -- MR. WHITE: -- indicating that they recognize the mistake. Page 260 October 22, 2002 And we're working with our contractor and the FEMA contractors to resolve those as quickly as possible. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: At this point in time, they can't force the people out in Golden Gate Estates to buy flood insurance, is that MR. WHITE: No. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: -- correct? MR. WHITE: We're a minimum of at least eight months away from any type at all of an implementation of these maps. And as Mr. Schmitt had indicated too, we're working diligently with the offer that FEMA has made as part of this letter that you have at the very conclusion to enter into a parallel process where we would be looking to actually have them acknowledge the methodology that our contractor has brought forward, that they cannot do as part of their standard review for these maps. But they're willing to work with us, they're willing to commit to a certain limited amount of funding from their agency for the purposes of resolving some of these technical differences and getting us to a place where we might actually have maps that are more appropriate and akin to what we believe is a better methodology. It may not be sufficient to meet the standards for a review by the agency, FEMA, but it will be something that I think ultimately in this parallel process will get us a better map, the one that our committee has been looking for for years. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: I hope we get this resolved. Because Florida is a donor state. We take care of everybody else up and down the eastern seaboard. Our money underwrites their expenses. MR. WHITE: That's one of the things I think that's been compelling, and something that's certainly been hurting Washington. So I think the efforts of all of our ad hoc committee, as well as the representatives of the city have been very helpful in getting us to the place where we are today. Page 261 1/2-5112- October 22, 2002 I just believe that it's a question of timing. If we can become actively engaged with FEMA at the earliest possible date, resolve these technical matters with respect to methodologies, get on to the point of utilizing the data, as we're going to have them corrected through this study and other points in the county, I think we'll ultimately be able to minimize, perhaps even down to zero, the number of days where we will have to live with maps that we believe are not technically correct. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: I appreciate that. Would you keep me appraised of every situation along the way -- MR. WHITE: Yes. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: -- so that I can be following this and react when I have to? MR. SCHMITT: Mr. Chairman, we certainly will. And I just want to for the record make sure and understand that there are also not only Golden Gate, but there are over 600 homes along the coastal community that will be impacted as well, and that is including the City of Naples; many homes in the City of Naples and businesses in the City of Naples that will be significantly impacted by a change in these flood maps. So it is a very important issue, and we will get -- certainly make sure you know when we're going to have a joint meeting. And I'll depend on County Manager Mudd to at least advise staff as to when that meeting will be so that we can jointly at least define a course of action that we want to take and to object to the technical data -- CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Very much so. MR. SCHMITT: -- that they're now using. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Commissioner Carter? COMMISSIONER CARTER: I won't prolong this, other than I congratulate staff and your persistence. I've been in this for three years and probably -- and God knows how many years before this. If we stay the course, FEMA, as the Chairman alluded to, even at the Page 262 cileS/17,- October 22, 2002 you money. So it's a very, very serious problem. And I believe that the -- Commissioner Carter's idea is great. The amount we get back from our flood insurance premiums is a mere fraction of how much we pay. And the FEMA map and the base flood elevations are based upon storm assumptions that have never occurred on the East Coast -- or West Coast of Florida. Never occurred. They have failed to consider that most of the hurricanes that hit our coast actually come across the state and are consequently not as severe. And they've made assumptions that -- of hurricane levels that have never occurred here. There are just lots of other apparently obvious mistakes, but I guess we have to develop the technical data to refute that. But I very strongly encourage that we fight it. And if we have the authority, and I don't know if we do, but if we have the authority to be self-insured, I'd sure vote for that, because we'd save a lot of money. But I really believe that FEMA's objective is to make it punitive to live on the coast. They are getting hit so hard with respect to government bail-outs for cities that are flooded out, even in Tennessee and other states that are located in flood plains and in coastal communities that are hit by hurricanes, I believe they are intentionally trying to drive people from the coast. And I think this is merely one step in the plan. And if there's a way we could become self-insured, I'd sure go for it. I think we'd all save a lot of money. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Any other comments? MR. MUDD: We plan to come back to the board on the 19th of November with this particular issue. Just as a note of information, the City of Marco Island has filed a complaint in the 20th Judicial Court about the takeover of the Florida waters by the Florida Water Service Authority, and I'll let you know that that happened -- I got noticed on Monday that that Page 264 1 fr lr2 May 20, 2003 BREAK—10:30 AM RECONVENED—10:45 AM 3. Beach Parking Agreement Update—John Dunnuck—Public Services Adm. Staff was directed to look at fair share compensation based upon the amount of the beach stickers distributed. They did a compared analysis of available beach spaces throughout the County. They came upon an agreement of allocation between the two staffs. They are looking at other funds that are available to do a capital request jointly or in conjunction with TDC funds etc. They will have something in the form of a proposed agreement for the Boards in early June. Mayor MacKenzie asked if they could make it a three agreement and in one year increments twice for the five year agreement, so it can be adjusted if necessary. Mr. Dunnuck said staff would agree to it. The City of Naples is looking at alternatives for funding-if accomplished looking at the methodology of parking spaces ratio and ratio of stickers issued. Together they will look at the impacts by the County and City. The City wants to be good neighbors and keep the beaches in the best condition they can be in. The City and County are working together and making sure everyone is doing the right thing and justifies where the TDC funds go. 4. FEMA Flood Map Update—Patrick White—Assistant County Attorney He introduced his team and gave a power point presentation as follows: - Purpose of presentation to brief everyone on the restudy process and the appeals resolution process. - Appeal process—FEMA incorporates appropriate revisions and published FIS report and maps. 10/03 Bob Devlin continued: - Covered initial Findings—technical data,methodology, and local historical data -Have improved the quality of the map—street names etc. —user friendly map. - Impact of Proposed Changes Stan Chrzanowski continued: - Golden Gate study map - Showed map - Discussed insurance—different zone of flooding—elevations—topographic map—data sent to FEMA and accepted. - 7,500 houses affected - Insurance may be raised by$1,000 - Signed Contract for additional benchmarks throughout Golden Gate. Page 5 of f(9. May 20, 2003 - Anyone building in the Estates from now on will be able to shoot the elevation of floor slab to make sure they are above the proper elevation. Patrick White continued: - FEMA is willing to consider the maps - Timeline for adoption of the new flood maps - Start to use maps October 2003 (will become effective) - Has asked for a delay. - Alternatives: - Accept current maps but refute proposed maps - Continue with the flood insurance rate map restudy process -Coastal restudy - Benchmarks in the Estates - Estimates for continuing services of TCE, Inc. &elevation benchmarks - Litigation - If rejected—start to formulate litigation process by October - Withdraw from Federal program seek support to form State program Vice Mayor Galleberg discussed several issues and feels they should continue. Commissioner Coyle is in support of the action taken to continue to work on it aggressively. Dick Tomasello—Tomasello Consulting Engineers—gave the proposed schedule. (Is in the presentation.) - Estimated total cost is$235,000—no additional funding is needed. - The best available data is being provided. - Two Congressmen are also working on the problem—Congressman Goss and now Congressmen Mario Diaz-Balart. Letters have been sent to FEMA. Copies were distributed to the City Council Members. Will continue to monitor. - There was an informal consensus to continue with the restudy process. Staff will hold another Joint meeting in September for an update and to be directed of procedure at that time. 4. Airport Road Flyover Update—Greg Strakaluse—Transportation Department— gave an update of the overpass: An Executive Summary has handed out. His report is as follows: - Gave impacts of Airport&Goodlette - Improvement to Goodlette Road project to Pine Ridge&Golden Gate Parkway - Looking at long and short term improvements—median enclosure - Working with businesses - Commitment Proposals - Golden Gate Parkway—4 lanes—widened to 6 lanes—Livingston to Santa Barbara Page 6 q`rsfo2 September 23, 2003 COMMISSIONER HALAS: Can of white spray paint. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Commissioner Coletta? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I don't know if my math is wrong or not, but if you've got a 40 by 50 screened in area, what does that come out to? CHAIRMAN HENNING: Well, it's not by that, it's by the floor covering. MR. SCHMITT: The floor covering. CHAIRMAN HENNING: The floor covering. MR. SCHMITT: One hundred square feet, $200. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Oh, okay. MR. SCHMITT: Two dollars a square foot. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I was coming up with a fee of like $2,000. It was scaring the daylights out of me. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Okay, there's a motion and a second. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN HENNING: Seeing none, all in favor of the motion, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Aye. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Aye. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN HENNING: Motion carries unanimously. Item #10L TO WAIVE FORMAL COMPETITIVE PROCESS AND APPROVE A CONTRACT WITH 3001 (THE SPATIAL DATA COMPANY) AS A SINGLE SOURCE VENDOR FOR GROUND Page 221 c hs(t. 4C1 September 23, 2003 SURVEY AND LIDAR ANALYSIS SURVEY WORK IN THE AMOUNT OF $49,425 TO SATISFY A FEMA REQUIREMENT FOR CERTIFICATION OF EXISTING LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY OF COLLIER COT TNTY — APPROVED MR. MUDD: Commissioner, that brings us to Item 10(L), and that is a recommendation to waive formal competitive process and approve a contract with 3001, the Spatial Data Company as a single source vendor for ground survey and LIDAR analysis survey work in the amount of$49,425 to satisfy a FEMA requirement for certification of existing LIDAR topography of Collier County. And that's at staffs request and Mr. Schmitt will present. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Commissioner Coletta? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Yeah, before you start, Mr. Mitchell, is there anything from the clerk's office that would raise any objection to this? MR. MITCHELL: No, sir. As long as you guys make a motion to waive the policy, that's well within your discretion of the board. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Thank you. MR. MUDD: And Commissioner, I will tell you that one of the reasons that staffs asking to waive the policy is that 3001 did the original LIDAR. If you have to go get another organization to go in there and confirm it, you go through a lot more cost, number one, and number two, they're a lot slower in order to get it done. We asked for an 18-month extension to the flood plain map requirement and we received six months. And so instead of having it done in October, we have to have it in April, I think, the 4th or something like that. And in order to get that done and get the LIDAR verified certified, that's why staffs making this proposal. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Great benefit to the citizens of Collier County? MR. SCHMITT: This is basically in response to the FEMA firm Page 222 Rr251[2 1M September 23, 2003 issue. Shown up there are two LIDAR maps over a drawing. On top of that are the flood elevations that currently exist now in the revised maps. And what we're trying to do is work with FEMA to validate the elevations within Collier County. As Mr. Mudd pointed out, 3001 flew the original LIDAR. It would not be in the best interest of the county to try and go back to another vendor to revalidate a.previous vendor's LIDAR. What we have to do is have that certified over 100 points. I think as a pretty good example, given that we have several folks from Naples Park here, this is a good example of-- let me -- the high areas of Naples Park. But some of these areas are listed in the flood zone, and actually in fact they should be zone X. And basically what we're going to do is the base data, which is the LIDAR data, light detection and elevation, data that we used to create these maps. What we're intending to do is have -- based on FEMA's guidance, we have to certify this data so they accept it under national mapping standards. And then that will be forwarded to FEMA, along with our -- the property descriptions, most notably the issue, Commissioner Coletta, in the Estates as well. And we'll use this data to validate our claim that some of the data that was provided earlier in this study is in fact incorrect. And the purpose is to do a letter of map revision, a large-scale letter of map revision to help resolve this issue involving the flood map issues in Collier County. So we -- based on that, we're asking for your approval for this contract to immediately initiate the certification for this, based on the guidance from Federal Emergency Management Agency, and that's both the certified, the LIDAR data, and then based on that we'll send in the property descriptions. But the most important piece here is the amount of work that's going to have to be done by 3001. They'll have to come out and establish 100 known points again on the ground and basically certify Page 223 w1 September 23, 2003 the data that meets the national mapping standards. COMMISSIONER HALAS: I make a motion -- MR. SCHMITT: Subject to your questions, that's all I have on this issue. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: This vendor is being held to the April deadline, too, I would assume? MR. SCHMITT: We have -- yes. They're ready to do the work now. We've been in consultation with Duberry and Davis, who is FEMA's contractor who developed the maps, and 3001 and my staff and, in fact, they're fully prepared to begin this work. And our intent is to get this done and meet the requirements that has been imposed on us by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for this data. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Let's start tomorrow morning. Motion to approve. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Motion by Commissioner Halas, second by Commissioner Coletta. Any further discussion? Just for the public's information, if we win on this issue, we submit these maps and they accept it, it's going to save the residents of Collier County millions of dollars. And, you know, I'm very concerned of the residents in Commissioner Coletta's district and the extra money that they would have to pay each month for flood insurance. All in favor of the motion, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Aye. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Aye. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Aye. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Opposed? (No response.) Page 224 111* April 27, 2004 and will stay in hire of Collier County until such time as he shows that he's not an employee of good standing. Next item. I just want to make sure the record is clear. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Before you go, I can't -- I can't control myself. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Me either. MR. MUDD: Well, I had a hard time. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Okay. I'm on a timer now. So I've got to make -- you know, I think this character assassination by association is absolutely despicable. Mr. Torre hasn't -- there hasn't been any indication that Mr. Torre did anything at all wrong, and because he worked in public relations for Governor Ryan doesn't mean that he also did something wrong, just as I suspect Martha Stewart's publicist is not being accused of having done something wrong because the person she worked for did. So you know, I think this is despicable, and I would like to see the newspaper adopt a more reasonable approach on issues like this and give people an opportunity to demonstrate their good character rather than making assumptions of this nature. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Commissioner Halas? COMMISSIONER HALAS: I go along that (sic) totally, and I'm amazed at the character assassination or the idea that a person is guilty just because of association, and if there's no grounds there, if the information was given to the Naples Daily News, then I think that they ought to use a little scrutiny in regards to exactly how they go about reporting it. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. Next item? Item #15C FEMA LETTER: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY AND FLOOD Page 119 qfre2 April 27, 2004 INSURANCE RATE MAP BY 12/01/04; CHAIRMAN TO SEND LETTER TO FEMA — APPROVED MR. MUDD: Commissioner, next item is, I just received a letter, and this is of-- this is of some immediate concern to the Board of County Commissioners and to Collier County. It's a letter that I received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and I'm going to try to put it on the visualizer. And hopefully we can -- we can -- and hopefully we can read along a little bit. And it basically says -- this is to Mr. Joseph Schmitt, and Joe doesn't have the authority to answer this. And it's reference to Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Map for Collier County, Florida, in incorporated areas restudy schedule agreement. Dear, Mr. Schmitt: As stated in our enclosed March 24th, 2004, letter, the effective date of April 16th, 2004, that was established for the Flood Insurance Study, the FIS, and the Flood Insurance Rate Map, the FIRM, for Collier County, Florida, and incorporated areas, has been postponed in order to provide sufficient time to address the county's request to improve local flood hazard information. Following detailed coordination efforts including a February 13th, 2004, meeting, at our regional office in Atlanta, Georgia, and subsequent conference calls on March 2nd, March 5th, and March 15th, 2004, Collier County agreed to provide the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA, with revised flood hazard analyses and digital flood hazardous mapping along with all supporting data by no later than December 1, 2004. We appreciate the county's continued commitment and expenditure to improving the flood hazard information reflected in the -- in the Collier County and incorporated areas, FIS and FIRM. Second -- next paragraph. The geographic areas covered by the Page 120 cli lZ April 27, 2004 new analyses and mapping include the entire Collier County and incorporated areas shoreline as well as the following six basins: The Cocohatchee River, the Golden Gate main canal, downstream of 951 canal, District 6, Henderson Creek/Belle Meade, and the southern coastal basin, and the Golden Gate Estates north. The methodologies to be applied to the restudy and the deliv -- and the deliverables to be submitted are outlined in the FEMA document titled, Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazardous Mapping Partners, dated April, 2003, found on the FEMA website at HHP (sic), and it's there for people that can read it. During the coming months, we will be working closely with Collier County and the county's consultant, Tomasello Consulting Engineers, Inc., which is TCE, to incorporate the improved data into the FIS and the FIRM. The enclosed schedule of work details the proposed submittal dates for each deliverable. To help ensure the quality of the final deliverables, we have tasked our map coordination contractor, Dewberry, to coordinate with Tomasello's -- TCE during the development of the -- during the development of the deliverables. Within 30 days of the receipt of each intermediate data submittal, we agree to provide review comments to TCE. In return, we would like to obtain the county's agreement that all deliverables will be submitted to us by December 1, 2004. If the deliverables are not -- make sure I get it. If the deliverables are not submitted to us by this date, we would also like for the county to agree that we can proceed with the finalization of the FIS and the FIRM on December 1, 2004, utilizing the data that has been submitted to us by that date. If Collier County is in agreement with this approach, please reply by this letter within two weeks of receipt, indicating that all deliverables will be provided by December 1, 2004, and understand Page 121 1`25 I2 April 27, 2004 that should they not be delivered by that date, FEMA will proceed with a finalize -- with finalizing the flood hazardous study for Collier County and incorporated areas using the information obtained as of that date. And then it basically says, here's the point of contact. But the key issue is, they want a reply within two weeks of submittal. I received it yesterday. We won't have time to bring it back to the board for discussion. And I pretty much have to get an answer, if the board directs to, to basically reply in agreement, that the deliverables will be there by 1 December of 2004, and if not, then FEMA will proceed with their maps with the best data that they have available. And, Commissioner, the one piece that I didn't show you -- and I ran this across -- against -- I ran this timeline against Mr. Schmitt over lunch, and he basically says that this is what was agreed upon at their meetings and those telephone conversations on those three different dates. So it's -- it's with -- it's in keeping with what we agreed with them. They just want confirmation now. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Right. And we are within the schedule that we originally set up, and we have another phone meeting taking place this coming Monday. As far as I know -- and of course, I'll be honest with you. I've never been in a situation quite of this magnitude before. We're not going to make the date, not 100 percent, for everything that they're asking for. We're going to have things that are going to be left out because of individuals out there that won't do what they're supposed to do as far as doing the surveys on their property. That's going to be an ongoing thing. Maybe Mr. Schmitt would like to address it, because I want to make sure we got everything up front. Because there's a certain responsibility on the part of the public to make this work. MR. SCHMITT: For the record, Joe Schmitt, administrator of Page 122 �( c2 April 27, 2004 Community Development and Environmental Services. Just so you understand, what this is committing to are the studies that we agreed to in Atlanta when we were on our trip, and this is what we agreed to provide within the specified period of time so FEMA would have its time to redo the maps. Basically what they're looking for is this commitment, and they'll have eight months to properly vet those -- that product. Commissioner, what you're talking about are certainly the impacts that those maps may have if, in fact, they impact -- adversely impact the residents, let's say, in Golden Gate. But that's something we're working separately. That -- those issues in regards to individual flood certificates or those type of activities, related and related significantly to this issue, but the agreement here is -- COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I understand. MR. SCHMITT: -- specifically dealing with -- COMMISSIONER COLETTA: The agreement -- the agreement is whole the way it's put together. The problem is is that that date is going to come in December. MR. SCHMITT: That's correct. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: And when that date does come, we're going to have some people that will not got (sic) the data to us in a timely fashion for their own particular dwellings. And that's something that every time I get the opportunity, I'm going to mention it to try to move people forward. It's -- their organizing in quite a few of the areas throughout the estates, and I assume other parts of the counties will also have to do this to be able to -- MR. SCHMITT: Most part -- most other parts of the county already have -- well, some of the homes have existing flood -- floor certificates, but areas that were in X zones previously and were identified in X zones, let's say, some -- even areas of Naples Park, Page 123 1( K April 27, 2004 they may not have current or valid flood certificates. And if, in fact, the designations change in those areas, they may be faced with a similar predicament where they're going to have to have a flood certificate in order to validate their base -- their slab elevation. But those are individual issues. We'll have to work with the staff, with the various communities. What these are, working with our consultant, to make sure we meet the commitment of providing the basin studies and also the storm surge models associated with the coastal impact. MR. MUDD: Commissioner, I'd also like to add that if an individual property somehow gets missed on the data, they still have the ability as the property owner to appeal and to go through the FEMA appeal process as they do their flood elevation certificates for their particular property. So it isn't a fait accompli on 1 December. That individual property owner -- COMMISSIONER COLETTA: And that's absolutely correct. MR. MUDD: -- doesn't give up. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I just wanted to get across -- also, too, if somebody does slip up and they didn't get their certificate and they have to get it after the fact, if-- for all the insurance, if the bank does force them to buy flood insurance, they'll get a reimbursement, FEMA told us that, for up to one year, as long as they haven't made any claims. So there are different avenues, and there's different ways we're going to go at it. But people have to be cognizant of the fact that there's going to be a certain amount of responsibility on their part to be able to prove the fact that their -- what their elevation of their house is, and that's going to be through a survey. And streets are going to have to organize so they can get the best possible price from the surveyors. And we'll be supplying this Page 124 /lcz April 27, 2004 information on an as-request basis. My office is willing to work with them very closely. We'll supply the mailing addressing for the streets. Any way we can help to keep this moving forward. You look a little surprised. I'm not going to personally write the labels out myself. I'll get them from the tax appraiser's office. MR. MUDD: No, sir. No, I agree with everything you're saying. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Tax Collector's Office. I'm sorry. MR. MUDD: I need -- I think in this particular case, I would -- I would like to have a motion that the chair -- COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I'll make that motion. MR. MUDD: -- that the chair would sign the agreement that's stipulated in this letter, and Mr. Schmitt will draft it and get it to the chair for signature and meet the two-week time frame that they're asking. CHAIRMAN FIALA: I'll second the motion. Commissioner Halas? COMMISSIONER HALAS: We need to make sure that -- I don't know whether we take out ads in the newspaper, but I believe we should make sure that -- or use our local government television station in regards to making sure that people are brought up to speed and up to date in regards, what's required of them. I'm concerned about people in District 2. And we want to make sure that those -- if people need to get their areas resurveyed so that they'll find out where they stand as far as flood elevation, we need to get that message out to everybody. MR. MUDD: And, sir, we're going to do everything we can on our TV station. And one of the opportunities for one of those PR firms that you just approved on 10(E) was to help us in this regard to get information out to the public about what they should do and what they shouldn't do in order to target those particular areas where people Page 125 April 27, 2004 need to be interested and involved. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Okay. Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Commissioner Coyle? COMMISSIONER COYLE: Yeah. That's a good idea. But could you make sure that the PR firm does it in terms that people can understand and not in the engineering terms that we -- MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. We're not -- we're not going to get into X's and double A's -- COMMISSIONER COYLE: Good. MR. MUDD: -- and AV's and all those particular things. We're basically going to say, you're -- right now you're in an area where you could possibly pay flood insurance. If you have a flood elevation certificate, please provide it. And if you don't, you might think about -- and we'll list all the firms or whatever that are out there that do survey work that they might get in contact with in order to -- in order to justify their particular case and get the information in that's needed by FEMA. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Well, and particularly along the coastal areas, everybody knows that they have to have flood insurance, the problem is what impact it has on them, such as making their home a legal nonconforming structure, which has implications with respect to other things -- MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER COYLE: -- as well as rates, so we need somebody to communicate that in lay terms to our community so they'll understand what the risks are. MR. MUDD: Commissioner, I'll review that personally along with the community development's administrator, Mr. Schmitt, and I would ask if you could be another set of eyes to help us as we go through that process. I don't mean to put you on the spot. COMMISSIONER COYLE: No, I'd be happy to help. Page 126 qb,Sta April 27, 2004 MR. MUDD: I'd be glad to have all the commissioners read that stuff-- COMMISSIONER COYLE: Yeah. MR. MUDD: -- to make sure that you can understand it. COMMISSIONER COYLE: I mean, let's face it, if we can understand it, anybody can understand it. MR. MUDD: I won't go that far. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. MR. MUDD: That's all I have, ma'am. If I could get a vote on that. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Yes. We have a motion on the floor to approve from Commissioner Coletta, and we have a second by Commissioner Fiala, to approve this letter. That's what I want to say. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FIALA: All those in favor, say aye. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Aye. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Aye. COMMISSIONER HENNING: Aye. CHAIRMAN FIALA: Opposed, like sign. (No response.) MR. MUDD: That's all I have, ma'am. Item #15D GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY — AIRPORT ROAD OVERPASS — DISCI INSET) CHAIRMAN FIALA: Okay. Now we'll start down here with Page 127 Board Minutes and Records (BMR) I'd like to show you ways to access various types of information related to the meetings and records of the Board of County Commissioners(BCC). First, from CollierClerk.com click on "Records Search" and then "BMR Records". Please read and accept the"Disclaimer Statements". On the BMR Records page on the right side of your screen, you can access "BCC Recaps"of meetings by year. Or click on"Board,Minutes and Records"to view a complete menu of information available on different aspects of the Board's business. Some examples of information you can access are: • BMR—BCC Minutes • BMR Advisory Board Minutes, such as: • The Planning Commission • Code Enforcement Special Magistrate • Code Enforcement Board • Coastal Advisory Committee • Environmental Advisory Council • BMR Agendas or Executive Summaries • BMR Backup Documentation on documents approved or adopted • BMR Resolutions • BMR Validated Ordinances Most of these records are listed by year, meeting date, and agenda item number. Resolutions and Ordinances are listed by year and assigned number. You can also do a customized search of BMR by clicking on the word "Search" just above the viewing window on the left hand side of your screen. Customized searches can be conducted using different search criteria including: • Text • Object Name • Within Folder • Within Volume or • Creation Date E citqc,2) i BMR (con't) A popular choice for doing a customized search is "within volume". If you want to access minutes only or ordinances only, go to "within volume" section and then "highlight a key word" in the box. By clicking the down arrow on your keyboard you can highlight your selection of choice. Or if you prefer, enter a key word in the"Enter Search" box and click on the "Search button"at the bottom of the page. "Name of Documents are listed on the left side of the search results screen; number of hits(within that document)on the right". If you click on "hits", the referenced pages will appear at the bottom by page number. If you select "document"the entire folder will appear. "You can also proceed to the next page by clicking on the down arrow at the top of the displayed page". If you want to print a document, you can select up to 75 pages to print at one time, and download them by clicking on the "pdf icon". Once downloaded, the pages can be printed by selecting the print key on the left side of the menu bar. Remember: Select only the pages that you want before creating a .pdf file and please logout when finished. We hope that these instructions have been helpful in describing ways for you to access information related to the various business you conduct with the Clerk's Office. We are here to serve YOU! Robert D. St. Cyr, Director, Community Outreach Clerk of the Circuit Court 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples,FL 34112 (239)252- 6879 robert.stcyr(&col 1 ierclerk.com ■ a) } +at'Q Fes) =W cd 7 m � 0 = U s OO 1.4 W H ZJ m I� Y _1 Q F- = F- I \ Qmw W U 1 W = I Ce F- m C �- I- a J U) �� .6 ,=. Q Z = a ce 1-1 O L , OO'W c W 0O R ce 0 UO ce 0 A) C1 1 N Q ce 0 2O W N o^° 0QZ 0 a \ i p I--LU Lel +s+� z l— 1:G 0 ma 0 < z n Q ix C al .4 i- 00 < cL O ° Zc m0 Q N wn0 z W U CO CO W = i a C '_ H U cn � 4 ~ O w tn U G w n Q Q 0U0 O w �1 ` Q m ~Oa W 1 owm O = i Z = W Y. .� w > I— W �O . Q 0 I- W W _ 1, Q Q ce Z ,� cYi� � J Ln ). 0 m V Al om = w I- N 4 , NO = _uj H A j u w� O O Z �I cu QC70H 0 ILI cd O. o z ~ 0 O W 7 u. W �o � f o _ WI N F- a W W W Lu < Q { C j W a W 0 020 , E ...1 N C CD ce °W° � O U a F- Z W i ~ -I� W W W E Q. J -J U u f a z W 010 a I i 7 ti 0 C 01 re Q 00 v) p W CU CO LL E c 0 0 ' ' W J 0 2 m cNY Qpw U I 00 W W 3 < WII-- H m fC ~ ~ a J tn •V WV W Z W Z p O = 0 L � � I-1-1 p OU re I- ce E0W p O a) Cif A d0 a a CG oHZ O ` C 0Ow < E"' X ^ CO Gl 4s O � w 141 0 0. O 110 1.- �O a5D a CG z Z c4 C • ° I- 1 W I d- 0 0 Q Q an w a • v 8, z 'Z' 0 , �j Umm = Q v vt za = g I-. 0 0 ~ U 0 LLI D ` 0u0 G V � a m z 0 CG W �1 O cn m O = J 1t'J °z > 1- LLJ U.cn 0 w Q , b n Q Z J Q ("D 65 er; _ LLI 1 L.;-, } U M a U a a, 001- W W M = CG = z z Q I- z * Lu O O N V /i , W y Q I- CG Z Ln 0. W W O p CD (9 O 1 W W f c � zr: _1 FW- ) W !- 0. w v) W 4/1 z w w GWL a Q = � z a W ° ~ ° O ° x a � aCi vm �' O U Z {A W >' W immi CL W z 4 0. Bag 5 2 Q z CgG 0u) UU 0. i:, .7,� a1 a -a � N m � o x O CO 0 W Z N 41 OJ Q W � � = m o Z U F- m 2 W W ..\ awc- F. m �p , 1=- 1- a a ,y ^ w z W Z W a � � � 0 w2 `l Lu ce0 O /�'" , . w C o W at \ Nam 0 0 .la CL \ o^ I- z Q 0 a H � O 0 a F" x � NH� 0 z ¢ 0 a � a -J C 9 I-- z a CD z ch f nN � I- o z m Qy t‘ U CO 00 W = U z �j W E F- v 1 � o � O N i ° Ja a o 4k o -, ce O r, >- k W Q oCWm LLJ 0 H = u. 1L z 1- m o re V 0 ae1°- 6 E W < 0 � � W �* J ..I J W " W W (+j z J J V } U ., m \ J om = v g imm 't \ N O 1- W W a 1- Z t2 ` zUi L. ¢ � 1"Lu G w �. C Zz4 W O W 0 i 0 C7 W LU !/\ 4 d 0 z '''l W V/ W a W W Q W = mow a a .J Z Q '� C U m 0 0 ce _N U `/ W W L n _Ji E } V ILI Oz a f a z re UviO U . lk iii ,la Ci O ce 01 4 CO � 0 W 2 >_ U o U) OJ 0 = m Q V O Q m LLJ 4L•1 W ic"......" Q w I-- CO 4 1- F Q > \. WZW z W I* U _ u) 0 U) I- E L — � Ce0 oL 0 its � w D v r-Y oIQ 0 a H ^ N W I w W 0 C c _ 9H z 0 � z � n° ca 4 Q E U m m W = �- ate= X H L ooI- u 0 ado 4 0 � vce G 0 0 m . Q } ^ a `'O oG W >1' w o LLI u.0w D Q6o IS L QcnQ1 z jill ILI QC7w W F 1 M m W u I-03, o O H W W N } = oc H 111 fk �= 0zQ � H z Z ` 0 Ce °O. C W O o0W ,, , u. J = Q � f 0 ILI 1—W 114 / G. L1 Fn J W W Q c D0z a w W z 1.4 a Um0 -' 0 _I z ul o CI. N G W O ~ J ~ > W J J Q u W 0 Z 0 = 0 a x Q 8 8 0.