PTAC Agenda 08/21/2018 Co er County
catØERAREATRANSIT
Public Transit Advisory Committee
Collier County Government Administration- Building F
3299 Tamiami Trail East—Suite 501 IT Training Room Naples, Florida
August 21, 2018
3:00 p.m.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Approval of Minutes
a. July 17, 2018 Minutes
5. Committee Action
6. Reports and Presentations
a. Summer Paw Pass
b. Bus Stop Shelters
c. Fixed Route Performance
7. Member Comments
8. Public Comments
9. Next Meeting Date—September 18, 2018
10. Adjournment
Two or more members of the Board of County Commissioners may be present and may participate at the
meeting. The subject matter of this meeting may be an item for discussion and action at a future BCC meeting.
Collier Area Transit operates in compliance with Federal Transit Administration, (FTA) program requirements and
ensures that transit services are made available and equitably distributed,and provides equal AGENDA access and
mobility to any person without regard to race, color, or national origin, disability,gender or age.Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964; FTA Circular 4702.1A, "Title VI and Title VI Dependent Guidelines for Federal Transit
Administration Recipients.
Anyone who required an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication,or other reasonable accommodations
in order to participate in this proceeding, should contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department
located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112 or 239-252-8380 as soon as possible, but no later than 48
hours before the scheduled event. Such reasonable accommodations will be provided at no cost to the individual.
MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC TRANSIT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MEETING
July 17, 2018
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Public Transit Advisory Committee in and for
the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 3:00
P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F", Suite 501, Collier
County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members
present:
ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman: Mr. John DiMarco
Vice Chairman: Mr. John Jenkins
Mr. Arthur Dobberstein
Mr. Harold Weeks
Mr. Richard Duggan
ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT:
Mr. Kerru Dera (Unexcused)
ALSO PRESENT:
Ms. Michelle Arnold, Director, Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement
Mr. Omar DeLeon, Senior Planner, Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement
Mr. Matt Liveringhouse, Transit Manager, Public Transit and Neighborhood
Enhancement
Mr. Barry Bland, General Manager, MTM, Inc.
Ms. Maylin Hernandez, Mobility Manager, MTM, Inc.
Page 1
Call to Order
Chairman DiMarco called the meeting to order at 3:00 P.M.
II. Roll Call
Roll call was taken and a quorum was established.
III. Approval of Agenda
+The paratransit application process was requested to be added as an agenda topic under
Reports and Presentations.
+Clarification/discussion regarding contracted paratransit buses was requested to be
added under Member Comments.
Mr. Jenkins entered a motion to approve the July 17, 2018 meeting agenda, with
changes as noted. Mr. DiMarco seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion
was carried.
IV. Approval of Minutes
a. May 30, 2018 minutes
Clarification: Reports and Presentations - c. Paratransit approval process, page 7: Mr.
Jenkins' statement that a 10-day pass should be given to applicants for transportation use
during the assessment/application period was meant to apply only to situations deemed
as emergencies.
Mr. Jenkins entered a motion to approve the May 30, 2018 meeting minutes, with the
noted correction. Mr. DiMarco seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion
was carried.
V. Committee Action
a. FY17 Minor TDP Update-Mr. DeLeon
The Transit Development Plan is updated yearly, as required for eligibility for the State
Block Grant and is submitted to FDOT in September. Noted updates to the document
include:
+Decline in ridership: Reference was made to several studies conducted by the
American Public Transit Association (APTA), as well as locally by the Center for Urban
Transportation Research (CUTR), which focused upon the national decline in ridership.
Identified reasons for the decline in ridership includes the increased availability of
automobiles for the lower quintile, market change, i.e., dispersion of passengers further
from transit for economic reasons, fuel pricing, land development encouraging single
occupancy vehicles, and the competitiveness of Transportation Network Companies
(TNC). A survey was distributed to county residents via social media and utility bill
mailers, with 457 respondents. Responses included a lack of convenience in using public
transit, as well as a desire for increased frequency. Of note, the study period
encompassed October 2016 through September 2017; however, this feedback has been
used as part of route modifications in FY18 and will be used for future planning.
Page 2
Mr. Dobberstein inquired as to possible reasons for the increase in ridership on route
20/Pine Ridge. Mr. DeLeon replied that as there was a decrease in ridership on route 26,
which also services Pine Ridge, perhaps a shift in ridership has occurred, leading to the
increased ridership on route 20. Mr. Jenkins inquired as to whether FY2018 results are
available, however Mr. DeLeon stated that these numbers are reviewed at fiscal year end.
Ridership is reviewed monthly, with no notable increases to date, despite the increase in
fuel costs since 2016.
Mr. DiMarco inquired as to whether the student summer pass program has been tracked.
Mr. DeLeon stated that a report could be generated of this program to assess the
number of passes purchased and subsequent usage.
Mr. Dobberstein inquired as to when the recently adopted fare changes would be
implemented. Mr. DeLeon stated that the fare changes which resulted from the Fare
Study completed in FY2018 were presented to the Board of County Commissioners and
approved and will go into effect October 1. The eligibility requirements for the reduced
fares have already gone into effect, which also now includes students of all ages.
The TDP Minor Update report also included route information for the beach trolley for
FY2017; the route has since been modified for FY2018.
Capital improvements for FY2017 included the design of 35 ADA bus stops, with
completion of construction accomplished in FY2018. Fifteen bus shelters were
completed in FY 2018, with 2 additional bus shelters pending completion. Bus stop
improvements and construction of some bus stop shelters involving 30+ sites in
Immokalee are pending, with the project presently in the procurement phase. Mr.
Dobberstein requested a brief photo collage of the proposed sites and planned
changes, for review by committee members.
Mr. Jenkins noted an absence of mention within the report regarding the possible
expansion of the bus terminal at Davis to accommodate other transports. Mr. DeLeon
stated the report reflects only accomplishments of the prior year and does not include this
information.
The report includes objectives and initiatives, as well as current status. Note was made of
the success and pace of the construction of additional bus shelters. Mr. Dobberstein
inquired about coordination with the county to include stop shelter designs during
roadway construction. Mr. DeLeon stated that if the project budget allows and there is
enough space, Transit is able to coordinate with FDOT, such as with sidewalk projects
presently underway in Golden Gate City.
Mr. Dobberstein inquired as to what could be done to improve bicycle storage on the
buses. Ms. Arnold stated that 3 position bike racks are available, however must be
purchased and installed after market.
Page 3
Mr. Dobberstein inquired as to the funding sources used to support new initiatives, such
as smart phone applications. Ms. Arnold stated that grant dollars are the primary source
of funding for these new programs.
Mr. Dobberstein inquired as to the current status of bus service to county parks, as well as
whether bus service is planned for the new regional park presently being constructed off
of Oil Well Road/951. Ms. Arnold replied that service is provided to most of the major
parks throughout the county. Consultants working on the new regional park design have
been made aware of the need for bus service/access and a planning meeting is pending in
this regard. While funding may be made available to construct the access to the facility
once it is completed, operational funding remains necessary to pay for the additional
revenue hours. Mr. Dobberstein suggested diverting service from Immokalee Road to Oil
Well Road, or vice-versa, to allow easier access to the new park; however, Ms. Arnold
noted the cost associated with deviations to the existing route.
Mr. Jenkins noted a lack of funding was the reasoning for non-accomplishment of certain
initiatives and inquired as to whether this was referent to a lack of grant funding, staffing,
or other? Ms. Arnold noted a lack of staff resources to accomplish many of the listed
initiatives, with insufficient operating funds being another significant reason. Mr.
Dobberstein suggested the use of lower cost measures to encourage ridership, such as
booths and brochures, such as at the Department of Motor Vehicles; however, Ms.
Arnold stated that public education remained an issue and would require appropriate
staffing and time. Mr. Dobberstein suggested that the Seminole Casino would be an ideal
opportunity to create a working partnership with Public Transit, i.e., for the employer to
subsidize bus passes for their employees. Mr. DeLeon was in agreement, however cited a
lack of response from Seminole Casino management in this regard. Ms. Arnold noted
there presently is bus service to the casino for Immokalee residents; however, none is
available from the Naples area. Mr. DiMarco inquired as to whether there would be a
twice daily bus route to the casino. Mr. DeLeon pointed out that the route 19 bus
presently makes six runs a day to the casino; however, no evening service is provided.
Mr. Dobberstein encouraged active participation in working with county and city
planners for the inclusion of transit funding opportunities. Mr. DeLeon referenced
participation with the Golden Gate Walkability Study, to ensure accessibility for
pedestrians, and that transit stops and sidewalk improvements are considered during the
prioritization process. Ms. Arnold noted that some developers are including pedestrian
accessibility in their design as an added feature for residents. Ms. Arnold noted the
desire for impact or other fees associated with development to potentially be applied
toward funding future routes, and these efforts will continue to be pursued.
Mr. Dobberstein expressed his concern at the use of performance measures and the
potential discontinuation of services following revisions to low performing services
which still do not yield satisfactory improvements. Ms. Arnold stated that the TDP
Major will soon be reviewed and this practice will be re-reviewed at that time.
Page 4
Mr. Dobberstein requested clarification with regard to bus replacement plans, as the
current cycle appears to be under the recommended replacement cycle. Mr. DeLeon
pointed out that dependent upon the route, the mileage requirement may be met prior to
the years of use requirement. Mr. Liveringhouse stated that the FDOT recently changed
the requirement for paratransit bus replacement to 175K miles and 5 years use for the
medium size buses and 500K miles and 4 years for fixed route buses. It was noted that
three buses are being retained due to the projected shortage of buses following increased
route frequency changes. Clarification to this process will be done when the Annual
Report is updated.
Mr. Dobberstein requested clarification with regard to grant submission and the verbiage
within the document which states that grants are submitted"as required." Mr. DeLeon
stated that some grants are recurring and submitted annually, and some are optional
competitive grants. Ms. Arnold stated that prior to grant submission, permission must
first be obtained and a match identified.
Mr. Jenkins questioned the lack of development of a formalized strategy, or of an
identified qualified individual, to work towards the development of partnerships between
public transit and local businesses. Ms. Arnold stated that a lack of resources has
prevented the pursuit of this project.
Ms. Arnold summarized the discussion by saying that creation of the TDP Major is
forthcoming and the many ideas discussed may be incorporated in the creation of the
plan, as well as ideas for implementation.
A workshop dedicated to Transit issues is planned with the Board of County
Commissioners on November 6, 2018 and Advisory Committee members were
encouraged to attend.
Ms. Arnold stated that an endorsement by the Advisory Committee of the FY17 TDP
Minor document was being sought prior to presentation to the Board of County
Commissioners for their approval, and then ultimately submitted to the FDOT.
Mr. Jenkins entered a motion to endorse the FY17 TDP Minor update as submitted.
Mr. Weeks seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion was carried.
VI. Reports and Presentations
a. Quarterly Report-Mr. Liveringhouse
Mr. Liveringhouse stated that Mr. Barry Bland, MTM General Manager, has been
maintaining statistics useful in determining trends. The documents shown were base
level information, primarily involving paratransit operations, with fixed route and
additional categories of information pending.
+Passengers and Trips Performed: Trips performed were decreasing into May due to
seasonal effect, however with the busiest March and April in history. Attendance
categorization procedures have been modified for greater accuracy.
Page 5
+Cancellations and No Shows: This trended with the number of trips made; fairly low
in April, with a spike in the eighth week of the quarter, then decreasing into May.
+Cancellations and No Shows by Percentage: Cancellations and no shows were close
to industry norms, with an aggregate cancellation/no show rate of approximately 15%-
18% nationally and the local rate at 12%. The no show rate is at 4%, resulting in
significant cost in resources. The system documents all trips made, noting all
cancellations; late cancel, cancel at door, no show, etc. A no show discipline policy is in
place, with the ability to suspend access, however is limited. Drivers are now required to
remain at a location for 5 minutes, with dispatchers noting call-ins for no shows.
Mr. DiMarco requested clarification as to the definition of no show. Mr. Liveringhouse
noted a pickup window of up to 30 minutes in which the vehicle may arrive after the
appointed time. When the vehicle arrives within this pickup window, they may wait 5
minutes for the rider to show. A rider may call in to either be placed on will call status or
may reschedule for 20-30 minutes later. Disciplinary measures are enforced following a
specific number of no shows, but also taking into account the reason for the no shows.
As an example, Mr. Liveringhouse noted 100 no shows during the last week in the
service, with a revenue loss to the provider of$27-$28 per trip, as well as other
passengers left waiting for their trip due to overbooking. Mr. Dobberstein inquired as to
whether a rider may utilize a text or app to cancel their appointment. Routematch does
offer this option, with a phone app and web portal, however this is not offered as a
module for the service through the county Transit division. Mr. DiMarco discussed
Prime Ride through the Lee County Passport program, which offers bus service after
regular service hours, but at a higher rate. It was discussed that the higher rate after
regular service hours is allowable because the service exceeds what is required per ADA
guidelines. Mr. Liveringhouse noted that the county may exceed ADA minimum
requirements, but at a significant cost. Many options are being considered for future
implementation.
+No Show,Late, and Unscheduled Index: It was pointed out that the number of late
trips would presumptively be reduced in correlation with a reduction in no shows.
Further, 8% of trips are left unscheduled to account for now shows and cancellations that
occur during the day.
+Late and Unscheduled Trips: Quantifying the total for each week, an average of 60 to
80 trips were late, going as high as 100 late trips. A recent contract modification allows
for the assessment of a penalty of$50 for trips that are late in excess of 15 minutes, in
order to incentivize the provider to maintain appropriate service levels.
+Productivity: This pertains to the number of passengers per revenue hour, with a goal
of 2 passengers per hour, although providers document trips per hour.
Page 6
+On Time Performance by Appointment: There has been a significant improvement
in on time performance, presently in the 90th percentile, up from the 80th percentile last
fall.
+Driver Rule 14-90 Hour Violations: Florida Statute stipulates that drivers may only
drive up to 12 hours in a day. The number of drivers in violation of this rule in a week
has dropped by more than half, with MV increasing staff in the last 3 to 4 months. Mr.
Jenkins inquired as to whether liability insurance is maintained for drivers who may
exceed their daily driving hours limit. Mr. Liveringhouse pointed out that any such
liability lies with the vendor and not the county. Previous driver shortages were
addressed by MV at the beginning of the year, who increased starting wage of pay, with a
resultant increase in applicants. Twelve weeks of driving and training are necessary in
order for a driver to fully acclimate to the position and achieve optimum proficiency.
+Complaints, Incidents, and Accidents: Complaints have decreased significantly from
week one. Vendors are now required to fully document early trips and late trips, and data
is being significantly reviewed to determine causes and remedies. The excellent safety
record and lack of"at fault" accidents were highlighted.
A brief conversation was had with regard to the current paratransit fees, which are
structured to be fair for all riders.
b. Paratransit Application Process -Mr. Barry Bland, MTM, May Lin,
Mobility Manager
It was explained that applications for assessment of paratransit use eligibility may be
obtained via mail, online, fax, as well as at local centers, such as the Lighthouse of
Collier or the Jewish Community Center. Once the application is completed and
submitted, the applicant is called to schedule an in-person assessment. Appointments for
assessments may be scheduled as soon as for the next day. If an application is
incomplete, the applicant is called and notified as to what additional information needs to
be submitted. If the applicant does not answer the call, a voicemail is left, with up to 6
phone call attempts made at differing times and days, with calls logged on the applicant's
cover page. The application consists of multiple pages, covering general information,
\accessibility issues, income information, and medical information which is completed by
the applicant's physician. At the time of interview, all application information is
reviewed and entered into the Routematch database. Assessment is also made at that time
of physical and cognitive abilities.
At this point, the application process is complete, and a review is conducted by the
Mobility Manager and the County Transit Manager. As per ADA guidelines, a
determination letter is sent during the subsequent 21 days. As an example, in the month
of June, the application process averaged 11-12 days from the completed application to
the mailing of the determination letter. 36 applications were received in the past 17 days,
with 29 complete applications and 7 incomplete applications, and with 28 interviews
conducted.
Page 7
Mr. Dobberstein inquired as to whether information may be electronically transmitted via
text or email to save time. Information is presently able to be emailed to applicants if so
desired. Mr. Dobberstein stated that hospital case managers, social workers, physical and
occupational therapists, and home healthcare workers should be given appropriate
education on the process, as they often initiate this process on behalf of their patients. Ms.
Arnold confirmed that education is being done but remains an ongoing process.
Mr. Jenkins inquired as to the length of the time of the interview and assessment, as well
as what the subsequent 21-day review process timeline consists of It was clarified that a
meeting is held every two weeks between the Mobility Manager and the Transit Manager
to review all completed applications. Most delays may be attributed to a delay in receipt
of information from an applicant.
Medical transport companies versus true public transit use scenarios were discussed. Ms.
Arnold reinforced the benefit of appropriately trained hospital staff initiating the patient
transportation application process on their behalf. Mr. Jenkins recommended that
applications approved by the Mobility Manager be emailed to the Transit Manager, rather
than waiting to discuss hard copies every two weeks, in the interest of saving time. Ms.
Arnold stated that the present system allows for an auditing checks and balance system
and does not add to the overall processing time. Mr. Weeks inquired as to the length of
time an applicant must wait to reapply following a denial. Ms. Arnold stated there is no
waiting period to reapply; however, if an applicant chooses to appeal a denial, this
process may take up to 60 days. Mr. DiMarco expressed his complete satisfaction with
the interview and assessment process, based upon his own experiences.
VII. Member Comments
Mr. Dobberstein requested clarification regarding the use of non-county owned buses,
noting the present fleet of 27 fixed route buses and 27 paratransit buses owned by the
county, as well as 8 privately owned vehicles. Mr. Liveringhouse replied that
historically, the servicer would provide all of the vehicles; however, over time, the county
began providing the vehicles in the interest of continuity of service. The county assumes
the capital assets, overhead, offices, and garage and parking facilities. Having its' choice
of providers for the service assists with growth; i.e., a private agency may purchase a bus
within a week, while grant processes may take up to a year for a county purchased bus. It
was clarified that Cat Connect are county owned vehicles bearing the new wrap design.
Mr. Dobberstein inquired about the new paratransit buses which have a different look to
them than the others in service. It was clarified that these are Ford transit vehicles and
there is a plan to purchase 4-5 more in the next cycle. These vehicles are less expensive,
have 30%better fuel economy, are easier to work on, and have greater interior capacity
to better accommodate passengers with assistive devices.
VIII. Public Comments
There were no comments made by members of the public.
Page 8
IX. Next Meeting Date—August 21, 2018
X. Adjournment
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was
adjourned by order of the Chair.
Public Transit Advisory Committee
John DiMarco, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on as
presented or as amended
Page 9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Reports/Presentations
Item 6a
Summer Paw Pass Program
Objective:
To provide the committee with an update on the Summer Paw Pass which is a discounted 3-month
summer pass, with unlimited daily rides, to any-aged student in Collier County.
Considerations:
The Summer Paw Pass was marketed to students of all ages. Posters were printed and distributed
on the buses, transfer stations and around various businesses through the county. A digital
marketing campaign was run through the Naples Daily News, which included a digital display ad
on the Naples Daily News' website as well as targeted ads reaching individuals who are students
in Collier County. The ads ran for 8 weeks in June and July with the Naples Daily News.
The Si.uluner Paw Pass was also marketed through the various agencies in Collier County, which
included presentations at the Early Childhood Network Meeting in May, the Bi-weekly Collier
County New-Hire Orientations and a presentation to the students at the Lighthouse of Collier
County.
Overall, the sales of the Summer Paw Pass remained virtually equal to the previous year's sale of
the passes. In the summer of 2017,40 bus passes were sold in the transfer stations compared to 42
passes that were sold in the transfer stations in 2018. In FYI7, 10 additional Summer Paw Passes
were sold from business sales vs. 3 sold from businesses in FYI8.
Recommendation:
This item is information only. No approval required.
Prepared by: ( pi`s- Date:
Elena Ortiz Rosado,Events, Sale and Marketing Coordinator
Approved by: � . - ' =-'" Date: (}'-1? 1
Michelle Arnold,PTNE Division Director
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Reports & Presentations
Item 6b
Bus Shelter Construction Update
Objective:
To update the committee on the bus shelter construction program.
Considerations:
Collier County Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement (PINE) staff has been
implementing a program to construct 10 new shelters since April of 2018. As of July 2018, 7 of
the 10 have been completed and the remaining 2 is scheduled to be completed before the end of
the year.
Staff is working with the Procurement Department on a design build proposal to continue
constructing additional shelters within Collier County. There are approximately 40 shelters that
will be constructed under that process over the next 3 years.
Recommendation:
None.
Attachment:
Pictures of Bus shelters
Map of shelter locations
Prepared by: rig' s 1A v` Date:
Yousi Cardeso, Operations Analyst
� -
Approved by: s Date: /7-/f
Michelle Arnold,PINE irector
1. i
A ' r/*"'
'
Ilio.
Y
1
i1
i ,;, if
fr
in
Qi
n
on
is y
" Yt
4
U Y
•
.. I i A.
M ,.
r.
C. '
cuo , _ ,.. . , ... ",,,...„,a ifa li---ri 1 . ., • .., - '2 • .'
\if'I
'�� vR" as
s
�� _
r,-,,e,... ___;_ ,_..
_.. ..,. .
c , ,,,...„,..,,...„..,..„. 3
,„.._,,
r ` .4 ., . �,
•
- � �, Li. .
, .-_' tet—
.'I I ;+ *
t.
,C ". R'
/ / \I/./.11-1-;!,:.--•-•!,
Naples Shelters Page 1 of I
Naples Shelters
t�►llz�nAcleo
city
stool Ir•
a a Inwk4Ie
Bonita
!3p►I'AL
8
a"**
sr
•:
•• e„
•
h®
M.w�;�Ia1.wld
d I; II
r — ,
https://cgweb05.carlegraphoms.com/CollierCOFL/Map/Printout?title=Naples%20Shelters... 8/17/20 18
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Reports and Presentation
Item 6c
CAT Performance Measures
Objective:
Present Collier Area Transit Performance Measures
Considerations:
Staff will present the quarterly Performance Measures to the committee for review
recommendations for improvements.
Recommendation:
None.
Attachment:
Item 6c Performance Measures.xlsx
Prepared by: G==- - L; Date: e-/7-/ ---
Omar
-77-/Onlar De Leon, Senior Planner /V
1f
Approved by: Date: P-17- 1/-
Michelle Arnold, PTNE Division Director
0
a 0 0 0 0 07o 0 a 0 ° eco = 0 0 0 0
0
7 " 07
.Vi N V .m1 0 co . N V tO 7, N N CO 0 "1d
u) N r N V N m 10 N- N V N Is... O CO m m V M V
0c0 r N 10 CO r V CO CO N m m r V u) M V) m N V
CO O r O r N N V CO V M r on m O t0 r O
m In m V r M V N 10 .- V N V N N M N
v
^2 r
COr. m M O 0) Y) 0 0 m m CO 0) 0 cv V N m 00
0 0) 00 V u) O r N '7 N N r O) 0 0 V m O
(p V CO 0 1n 0 m V 10 00 0 ^ V M (0 O 0 M O O ,Ni
2 O r W 10 O V V N 10 to V V M N N m
e e o e o 0 0 a a 0 V ' M
0 m o V 'i m o N o e o N m o O N t0 m r '-'
m N 1\ '' '' 71 m '' lT 10 t0 N 't 00 .i o .-I co co '71
co O co M r V 0 t0 V N 0 CO V (0 N O N O O
N 0) 10 10 10 r V r N r V CO 0) 17 m m r N O
Nci^, a (N V V O m 0 0 M m m 0 10 O CO (O
W 6) co In O V r co V N 00) O O M N M N m N M r t0
LL
L
(� .(\1 on 1T 1n O M 1- r N 0 0 cV (1') CO 01 (0 0) m (O O
O 10 CO N m CO N M N 1- CO 0 O r 0 ,- V
CO 0 LO 00 to CO CO 0 t0 .- (') 0) r N O m •- CO m N f0 CO m N
LL r r In V m V V N O m O V M V N N '- n
2 0
a) On
V o\° 0 0 0 * egg o
C O N 7 00 1 on 71 V CO W ry U) N V 00 t00 N O 00 10 r.,' 74
E .E m.1 V m 10 M V CO 1') .- m CV 10 M (D m .- ' N
N r r 0 '? 10 N M O m m r „) r V 1 et
N
C N O V (N N CO N CO 0 O In O m 0 r V r V
16 CO (O 10 V CO M V N N •- M M N N N O
L (O
0
kt m CO O N 0 O M M V 00 r r CO N r
A) ~ r r N ,- N N CO 10 V 0 U) 0- co m O O 1n N 10 O
Y/ C 0 t0 ,- N (0 r N V O O O (O m N 0 r 0.1 m
^ ^ ON (0 10 O V V N V m O * MOO m N ,- •- m
iia
s 0
GO
trI a 0 0 O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
^L 'Vi 0) N N Cr, N N N N V 1n .) .N .
W
N CO m N N 0) O m O V r r r m to 0 V O N m 0 N7
V 10 COm V 10 10 cO M r r V N CO(O O r N
A/ 1n O N O r m N N 10 O r d' 0 '0 O m V 0- M 1n (n
IX 01' m (0 (0 O r M '0 N 10 s- M N V CO N CO
W
0 ...( O (V (i.2
O r 0 0 0 V CO O CO '- 10 O co V m
m m N O In m N o V N O O V O t0 m (CO
0
N m (A V r In M V V V O O V N r V N O) N
O r tO N co V V N 10 r V M V M r N 13 W
CI
11. lO 01 V 01 c2. N CO O 00 00 to 0 m
O N 2-1 01 0. CO 10 N O N N m m
Hroj (rj' . .-1 '-1 .-1 m-ii lJ m I-4 NN 'i r,./ N 0 Nti
7- .-1 ,-I N N N .--I 0-10 0 0 0 o 0)
0an 0 0 . . 0 0 ti m N m o 0 0 o m a
0 .71 D °P '' 71 t0 V N m r71
.-1 V 00 V O 1n co N
N 1.0 0 N N InV e-1 OO Cl N V N
CO r 0 0 0 N N On 0 m V N. M
r ti r'j N V m m m m r'j rtj rl nl '-( m N 0 0 N O CO 10 r 0 c0 10 0 ,- (0 O N 0 N y)
N .-1 N H .-1 N .-1 N H .-i 0' .-I j m 10 O M O 10 N O U0 m r N m O In V co
m V O V V M (0 m O 1n m M m (0 0- t0
0 LL z m c0 co V m V N N m M N V N r N 1M
N
.
CO 0V
.+ v CO CO m CO r o (n m 1n "Cr In m N
J . V N CO V m ,- V O c^') D on (O O CO C1 ^ N M 0 y)
{1 0 m (O r M 10 t0 (0 10 M 0 N V 0 m
0 z CO r u) O O V V co 10 m O V M V M O N N n
N
0 00088
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
✓ rn m 1n M 0 (Nn c 0 0 a
i5 V (+1 . N 0 0 0 0 0 V
0 0 0 o r
O o N , „ •N o, 0j , 0 0 0 0 m O o m A 0 0 0 2° 3� 00 m o a m o o c
.-( . 0 . N n t0 (! C V 0 00 N 01 C)
m m m 10 '1 In N CO
N 10 V) N O O V m r ^ (�
m CO m (0 m 10 1n N co 00 .y O M V r r O O 1n CO 0 0 0 m c7 m N N
N O In ti O O V O r m O O m N O 0) (0 V IN O N (0 r O V 10 CO
>- CO r r W00 N N 00 N 7j O CO (O N N O M CO V cO N N- V N MCD O O Ci
D. In 0 m r 10 t0 0 V V co 10 r V on V N IN N ,- CO
L
(_001,
N O .-1 r 0 O N 0 00 O N 0 0)
L V to 1n V (n m 0 co V 1n --1
K r V O W ✓) N O) lD N V O O V N d o 10 M N V co M co M O m co O M O 1n 0 (O VN
'1 0 r 0 00 (n N r O N Ni (0 1 10 • 0 10 0 r CO 10 0 N CO r M M V O N . (n 0 a
Y 00 N CO r r m N N r r r V 0) y co r co N M m o a co o co co M N O V O r O
(y m6' O O t0 to O In V co 10 .- M N V N N N '- m
'- N M O Y) (0 N m O O N M V (0 CO 1.- 00 O N
6) '-
. . N N N N N N N N N N 0-
> 1- D W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W __I
Y “ E E ,a E v i- 1- 1- F- i- i- r- I- 1- HhF- Hr i- 1- r )- Fr
• O N N O — T 61 ro m 7 D m 7 7 p m m n 7 m 7 n m D n m 7 m F
o 0 o y c v ., (6 m g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2020 2a2 2, , a1n 1- MCGrerrrretrer[ W W wCZaXreWMCereCet-
0
0000000000000000 00
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g o 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00
W
G 0
r O M 00 v V M r - . M . m OO O o ..N 00
.. CO N N 0) 00 O (D CO N N V N N O CO V 07 m } }
.y M (D r V m V N (D N CO V (D (O r V r O 0 N LL Ll.
a V M M N V N N r N N N N r r r V
N
V §
I I � I !
0
1 in
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 O
W
6- 000Q0000000000000 o 0
it a
00000000000000000 0 0 « W
. . . . .. . . . . . .1 .. . . . .-I .. .1 .1 � r G V
H
00 O
m
Q I �'�
i
N
M O Of V O N O N m O N000 ,- MM N
I Q N
N 0 N D) N V V 0) r r O O N N 0) N
V O
•"1 O O N M 41 M r 0 00 M N N N N 00M M V O a
tio aD N O N 00 V V M N r V M V N N N .- I
Q I-
0)
0
o o g n
I5j0)
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) i
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 N
IN
0-I
O m N r. OVMM M 00 O M O N N 0 0 0 co I.L.
00) N
NN 0a ( I T O0 00OONWN0N VNN MMM m Cal • N NW co D VN V M O VM V .i. m Ea.
csi
N
1 n W f 1 .Na
e 1
o
0000 * * * * * * * * * * * e * O o 0C =Im a
a o 0 0p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 I a m N
0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 ri p
.1 .. .9 .. ri .i .. .-I .. .1 .. .. .i .i .1 .il .1 to N N
CO
0 I I 1
- u'
O E
� o
0 N 0 N
U 12Im n
V N M O) 00 N N N O M 00 (0)0 N 0 co N N N m
CT.
i
N M M M N M N 0) N O V O M O V 0 m r M
W N: M 0) m O) r N N O N O O O r N V r O) N Q
C N N )O V N V M N .fi r V M V N N .. r
r-- w0w), I • O N m
�W 2 i w
VI { N n tma i
a * * * * * * * * 0 gee 3*3 * e cp
N 0 .. O 00 00 M .. g N N 0 m 0 N O e
H H ,1 N .i .1 M .i o 7 .. .1 m ry q 0)o w .m,. .`�,.
M V) O) N N Vl OD m N V N N 0l O V (0 N N [ •� tn
M N
)O N 4. 04 (D in 0 400 .-1 O m m 0 0 M CO 'F 7 N NI
V M 00 .. V .. lD l0 .1 tD 0) V 0 M t0 M m O) 0] N G 00 Y1
N l0 u1 V N V m N .O V N m W N .. m CO N l0
r N
F m
Y
m
N O M tND N N O N OVi V N OO/ C'M) o O N 4m'f N 00 N Oill E ooi )0 f
(0 00 0) M 00 m 0 Y
l,0
m h. (D v) 0) uN V N ui .- V M V N N r N •w.,0 N
0 P
2 F of
0 N
00 .�. moo .e ,Nii0mv `\-. o oto vie v? 1z1
;
N
V ✓) '7' .. .. R In m m q ., m N a a r N N of
NVNMMV11 1
V r u) N U N M N V M 0 m 00 M
00
O(D )D M )O O) O) N V M
.-I N N N m M O W (D 00 W W N N 0 N W O M ( N 00 W N n1
06 r M V N V Ti N vi M N M .- N N r N JD O 00
G o
`t n Iplm 2
O N N V )O V V 0) O (D M N O 07 V 0)0 M M M + ,.N. r
N M 0 m N 00 O 0 m M (O N W N M `- M 00 o O 8 O_ 8 O 8 I�`
V N V O Cn N M O CO N CO V sr (n m M N N W N O O O
a 0 N (p 10) co- V V N V r V m V N N N r )0 ,ri d N d d vi 0]
Q N 00 0) N N l0 CO ul N
r N M of U) ID N 00 0) O N M V M oO NWMN
r N N N N Cl N N N N N r
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W J
F- F- F- F- F- F- I- F- F- I- F- F- F- F- F- F- I- F- h F Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a I-
33.A.2Packet Pg. 519Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 520Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 521Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 522Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 523Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 524Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 525Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 526Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 527Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 528Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 529Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 530Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 531Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 532Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 533Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 534Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)
33.A.2Packet Pg. 535Attachment: PTAC Meeting Agenda & Backup - August 21, 2018 (6600 : Public Transit Advisory Committee (PTAC) - August 21, 2018)