HEX Agenda 08/23/2018 AGENDA
THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY,AUGUST 23,2018 IN CONFERENCE
ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING®ULATION
BUILDING,2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE,NAPLES,FLORIDA
INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY
THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC
MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL
SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED
DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE
RECORD.
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL
NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY
NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH
RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE
BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT,
PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING
EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A
COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME,
ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS
WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL
ADDRESS.
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. REVIEW OF AGENDA
3. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. PETITION NO. BDE-PL20180001257—Mary Wambach and Glennon Melton request a 22-
foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land
Development Code, for a total protrusion of 42 feet,to accommodate a new docking facility for
the benefit of Lot 20, Landings at Bear's Paw, also described as 1684 Vinland Way, in Section
35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: James Sabo,
AICP,Principal Planner]
B. PETITION NO. CU-PL20180000204—Islamic Center of Naples, Inc. requests a conditional
use to allow a place of worship within the Estates (E) Zoning District pursuant to Section
2.03.01.B.1.c.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code. The subject property containing
4.98 acres is located on the east side of County Barn Road, in Section 8, Township 50 South,
Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida. [Coordinator:James Sabo,AICP,Principal Planner]
4. OTHER BUSINESS:
A. HEARING EXAMINER DECISION TO CORRECT A SCRIVENER'S ERROR IN HEX
NO.2018-13
PETITION NO. BD-PL20170002726 — Daniel Scandiff requests an 11-foot boat dock
extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land
Development Code for a total protrusion of 31 feet to construct a 908 square foot docking facility
with a boat lift and a kayak/paddleboard platform lift for the benefit of Lot 2, Block H of the
Conner's Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit subdivision, also described as 474 Palm Court, in
Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy
Finn,Principal Planner]
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS
6. ADJOURN
AGENDA ITEM 3-A
Cot Jer C�oumty
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: AUGUST 23, 2018
SUBJECT: BDE-PL20180001257, 1684 VINLAND, WAMBACH DOCK
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Owner: Mary Wambach & GIennon Melton
1684 Vinland Way
Naples, FL 34105
Agent: Turrell, Hall, and Associates, Inc.
3584 Exchange Avenue
Naples, FL 34104
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner is requesting to construct a new single-family dock facility along the man-
made portion of the Gordon River. The maximum permitted dock protrusion for waterways
greater than 100 feet in width is 20 feet into the waterway. The proposed dock facility will
protrude 42 feet from the property line, which is the most restrictive measurement.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject property is located at 1584 Vinland Way at the Landings of Bears Paw, further
described as Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida. (See
location map on the following page)
BDE-PL20180001257, Wambach Dock Page 1 of 9
ver.8.13.18, HEX 8123118
m �
�d
9*tri
a�
;r
q�
m�
)<0
0
OD C>
w
�LA
m�
a
l7
0
A
Paw
PROJECT
LOCATION
Location Map
Petition Number: PL20180001257
Zoning Map
CITY OF
NAPLES
TRACT D
SITE
�L�19
LOCATION
80
2i 23
22
BD
19
THE
AT B
/-
1.11 � f
RSF-4
MANATEE POINT
CONDO
Petition Number: PL20180001257
Zoning Map
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The purpose of this petition is to obtain approval for a boat dock extension application for an
accessory use to a new single-family home along the man-made portion of the Gordon River.
The new home was constructed as part of the Landings at Bears Paw PUD project. The
proposed boat dock facility would protrude 42 feet from the property line, which is the most
restrictive measurement. For reference, the projection from the Mean High -Water line is 30
feet. The total decking area for the dock is proposed at 542 square feet. The proposed dock
has a boat lift option. The proposed extension request is 22 feet over the allowable 20 -foot
maximum protrusion from the property line.
There is one slip proposed for the dock facility and the boat length is 36 feet. The approved
PUD for the Landings at Bears Paw development requires a 7.5 -foot setback from the riparian
lines, provided the boat slip is parallel to the shore line. The proposed dock meets the
minimum setback requirements of 7.5 feet on each side with a 7.5 -foot setback at the east
riparian line, and a 7.5 -foot setback at the west riparian line.
There are four BDE applications within the PUD that were previously approved by the HEX
near this boat dock extension request, which are 1696 Vinland Way (43 feet), 1692 Vinland
Way (44 feet), 1688 Vinland Way (46 feet), and 1672 Vinland Way (44 feet). They were
approved on 5/10/18, 4/13/17, 9/22/16, and 06/14/18 respectively.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
SUBJECT PARCEL: The site is currently developed, zoned RPUD, Landings at Bears Paw
residential
SURROUNDING:
North: RPUD, zoned Landings at Bears Paw, residential use
East: RSF-4, zoned Residential Single -Family use
South: A, Rural Agricultural District, RSF-4, zoned Residential Single Family,
Golden Gate canal and residential
West: RSF-4, zoned Residential Single Family, P, zoned Public Use, Gordon River
Greenway Park and residential
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION:
Environmental staff has reviewed this petition and states that there are no sensitive
environmental issues. Additionally, a submerged resources survey was prepared by Turrell,
Hall and Associates, Inc. and was used for the environmental review. The survey document
is included as part of back-up packet materials.
BDE-PL20180001257, Wambach Dock Page 3 of 9
ver.8.13.18, HEX 8/23/18
AERIAL PHOTO
STAFF COMMENTS:
The Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) shall approve, approve with conditions, or
deny, a dock facility extension request based on the following criteria. In order for the HEX
to approve this request, it must be determined that at least four of the five primary criteria
and four of the six secondary criteria have been met.
Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 5.03.06.H and finds the following:
PrimM Criteria
1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate
in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the
subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged
barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and
from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family
use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip
SDE-PL20180001257, Wambach Dock Page 4 of 9
ver.8.13.18, HEX 8123118
per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips
may be appropriate.)
Criterion met. The proposed facility consists of a single slip boat dock with an
optional mechanical boat lift. The proposed dock is appropriate in relation to the 67
feet of waterfront property. The subject property is zoned under the provisions of the
Landings at Bears Paw PUD document, which regulates the number of boat slips
allowable within the PUD area. No more than two boat slips may be constructed on
each single-family residential lot, up to a total maximum of 38 boat slips for the PUD.
2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the
general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is
unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application
and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow
launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.)
Criterion met. According to the survey submitted by the petitioner, the water depth
at the site is too shallow to accommodate the 36 -foot boat described in the petitioner's
application at mean low tide. The mean low water depth is 1.54 feet, which meets the
intent of criterion two.
3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on
navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The
facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus
impeding vessel traffic in the channel.)
Criterion met. According to the survey drawing submitted by the petitioner, the
width of the navigable waterway approximately 121.6 feet. The boat dock will not
impact a marked or charted navigable channel. The survey document has been
provided as part of the packet materials.
4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the
width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway
width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The
facility should maintain the required percentages.)
Criterion met. The survey details that the waterway measures approximately 121.6
feet wide. The proposed facility will occupy 25 percent of the waterway width, and
75 percent of the width will be maintained for navigability.
Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the
facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility
should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
Criterion met. The approved PUD for the Landings at Bears Paw development
requires a 7.5 -foot setback from the riparian lines. The site drawings show that the
BDE-PL20180001257, Wambach Dock Page 5 of 9
ver.8.13.18, HEX 8/23/18
proposed dock is 7.5 feet from the property line to the east and 7.5 feet from the west
property line. The survey indicates the proposed dock facility will not interfere with
the use of neighboring docks.
Secondary Criteria
1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the
subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and
location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special
condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline
reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.)
Criterion met. A submerged resources survey was performed by Turrell, Hall and
Associates, Inc. on March 26, 2018. The survey indicates that negative impacts to the
submerged resources are not expected with the proposed dock facility. A relatively
high Top of Bank elevation and large rip -rap shoreline necessitated the proposed
access walkway of the dock to protrude further into the waterway to maintain an
adequate slope and reach adequate water depths, which is a special condition that
justifies the proposed dimensions of the proposed dock facility.
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the
vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of
excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should
not use excessive deck area.)
Criterion met. The deck shown on the drawings submitted by the petitioner is not
excessive, and square footage of deck area is comparable to previously approved
docks in this area; all of which have included kayak storage.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in
combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject
property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage
should be maintained.)
Criterion not met. The subject property contains 67 feet of water and canal frontage,
and the vessel is 36 feet or 54.0 percent of the water/canal frontage.
4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view
of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on
the view of a neighboring property owner.)
Criterion met. The proposed dock facility will be setback from the riparian lines in
accordance with the requirements of the RPUD. The drawing in the applicant's
support material labeled Adjacent Docks in Canal shows that the proposed facility
will be comparable to the existing dock to the east. There would not be a major impact
on the view of the neighboring property owners.
BDE-PL20180001257, Wambach Dock Page 6 of 9
ver.8.13.18, HEX 8/23/18
5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If
seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC
must be demonstrated.)
Criterion met. As stated, the submerged resources survey prepared by Turrell, Hall
and Associates, Inc. indicates that no seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed
dock facility.
6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection
requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable,
compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.)
Criterion is not applicable. The proposed project is for a single-family residential
boat dock facility. Section 5.03.06.E.11, Manatee Protection Plan, is not applicable
for this boat dock proposal.
Staff analysis indicates that the request meets five of the five primary criteria and four of the
six secondary criteria. Therefore, under the LDC provisions, the installation of a new boat
dock facility requires approval by the Collier County Hearing Examiner. The
recommendation by staff is approval.
APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS:
For any boat dock extension petition acted upon by the Collier County Hearing Examiner, an
aggrieved petitioner, or adversely affected property owner, may appeal such final action to
the Board of County Commissioners. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth
Management Department Head within 30 days of the action by the Hearing Examiner. If
approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that they must not proceed
with construction during the 30 -day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the
approval authorization shall be at their own risk.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for BDE PL20180001257 on
August 9, 2018.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above findings, the Zoning Division recommends that the Collier County
Hearing Examiner approve BDE P1,20180001257,1684 Vinland Way.
BDE-PL20180001257, Wambach Dock Page 7 of 9
ver.8.13.18, HEX 8/23/18
Attachments:
Back-up material, survey, including submerged resource survey
BDE-PL20180001257, Wambach Dock Page 8 of 9
ver.8.13.18, HEX 8/23/18
PREPARED BY:
1
S A O, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE
ZD IN IVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION
REVIEWED BY:
/1" �' x _16 7/(g
D V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DAT
ZONIN DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION
p
MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE
ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION
BDE-PL20180001257, Wambach Dock Page 9 of 9
ver.7.31.18, HEX 8123118
BRIE HEX PACKAGE
WAMBACH DOCK
1684VINLAND WAS'
NAPLIE, FL 34105
August 2018
Prepared by:
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.
3584 Exchange Ave., Suite B
Naples, FL 34104
(239) 643-0166
APPLICATION
WITH
PRIMARY & SECONDARY CRI'T'ERIA
.,4,,,-.rC0.Unty,
COWER COUN'T'Y GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.coII1egpw.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (739) 252 -OSS
DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION
LDC Section 5.03.06
Ch. 3 B. of the Administrative Code
THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): ■❑ DOCK EXTENSION ❑ BOATHOUSE
PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT NAME To be campkWd bystoff
DATE PROCESSED
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of Property Owner(s): Mary Wambach & Glennon Melton
Address: 1684 Vinland Way may. Naples State: FL ZIP. 34105
Telephone:
E -Mail Address:
Cell:
Name of Applicant/ Agent: Jeff Rogers
Firm: Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.
Fax:
Address: 3584 Exchange Ave pty, Naples stain: FL ZIP:
34104
Telephone: 239-643-0166 Cell:239-784-0081 Fax: 239-643-6632
E -Mail Address: Jeff@THAnaples.com
PROPERTY LOCATION
Section/Township/Range: 35149/25 Property I.D. Number. 54490010546
Subdivision: Landings at Bears Paw Unit: Lot: 20 Block:
Address/ General Location of Subject Property:
1684 Vinland Way Naples, FL 34105
Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property:
RPUD
BE AWARE THAT COWER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF
ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS.
8/03/2017 Page 1 c f 6
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 26M NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colberipv.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 232-6358
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing
facility, any other pertinent Information):
To em ftml a Mow t<nglw t* dm;Ift Isoft nlaM the nrm-made potlfm erthe Gwdoa River. Sha prapomd dock h appodmaidy 542 tdai nquwo lest.
The proposed dock hoe ane optional boat Moroi will protnrds eppw*notsy 42fsst from the by of beck and ao4loet nem the MHWL. Mare reques" a ID"
e ionsbn from the allowable 20 feet measured iwm the meen high water Una which hes been pmvlauslr established as the moat rostriatho point.
SITE INFORMATION
1. Waterway Width:
12D ft. Measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate
® other (specify) Aerial
2. Total Property Water Frontage:
67 ft.
3. Setbacks:
Provided: 7-5&7.6 ft.
Required: 7.$ a 7.6 ft.
4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water:
42 ft.
S. Number and length of Vessels to use Facility:
1. 3s ft.
2. ft.
6. List any additional dock facilities In close proximity to the subject property and indicate
the total protrusion Into the waterway of each:
Thera are numatous other dod king % dGUes m this wtahmay to ft seat and aoulhweel of tis properly. All of whkt protrude approximately
30'to 60' out Into the sante waterway.
7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in
size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of
the petitioned property? azo Acres
8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications:
To your knowledge, has there been an official Interpretation or zoning verification rendered on
this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, please provide copies.
9/28/2017 Page 2 of 6
Zoning
land Use
N
RPUD
Landings at Hears Paw
S
A & RSF4
Golden Gate Canal & Residential Single -Family
E
RSF4
Residential Single -Family
W
RSF-4 & P
Residential Single-Famliy & Gordon River Gmenway Park
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing
facility, any other pertinent Information):
To em ftml a Mow t<nglw t* dm;Ift Isoft nlaM the nrm-made potlfm erthe Gwdoa River. Sha prapomd dock h appodmaidy 542 tdai nquwo lest.
The proposed dock hoe ane optional boat Moroi will protnrds eppw*notsy 42fsst from the by of beck and ao4loet nem the MHWL. Mare reques" a ID"
e ionsbn from the allowable 20 feet measured iwm the meen high water Una which hes been pmvlauslr established as the moat rostriatho point.
SITE INFORMATION
1. Waterway Width:
12D ft. Measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate
® other (specify) Aerial
2. Total Property Water Frontage:
67 ft.
3. Setbacks:
Provided: 7-5&7.6 ft.
Required: 7.$ a 7.6 ft.
4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water:
42 ft.
S. Number and length of Vessels to use Facility:
1. 3s ft.
2. ft.
6. List any additional dock facilities In close proximity to the subject property and indicate
the total protrusion Into the waterway of each:
Thera are numatous other dod king % dGUes m this wtahmay to ft seat and aoulhweel of tis properly. All of whkt protrude approximately
30'to 60' out Into the sante waterway.
7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in
size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of
the petitioned property? azo Acres
8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications:
To your knowledge, has there been an official Interpretation or zoning verification rendered on
this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, please provide copies.
9/28/2017 Page 2 of 6
COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT nW NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.calliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252 -GM
PRIMARY CRITERIA
The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.05.06, shall be used as a guide by staff In
determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner
Will utilize the following criteria as a guide In the decision to approve or deny a particular Dods
Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be
determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria,
must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria
and/or questions.
1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to
the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration
should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of
transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family
use should be no more than two slips; typical mufti -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in
the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.)
2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length,
type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean
low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too
shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.)
3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an
adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or
charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.)
4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more then 25 percent of the width of the
waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock
facilities on either side c f the waterway Is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain
the required percentages.)
5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility Is such that the facility would
not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally
permitted neighboring docks.)
9/28/2017 Page 3 of 6
WAt Co>r�nty
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.collierpw.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
SECONDARY CRITERIA
1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not Involving water depth, related to the subject
property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock
faculty. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type
of shoreline reinforcement, shorellne configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.)
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for
loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly
related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.)
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination,
described by the petlNoner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage.
(The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.)
4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major Impact on the waterfront view of
neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major Impact on the view of
either property owner.)
5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass
beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.061 must be demonstrated.)
6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC
subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (if applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be
demonstrated.)
9/28/2017 Page 4 of 6
i
m5r-�Tcomz
COLLIER COIJNTY GOVERNMENT 28M NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergm.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239} 252-6358
Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for. -
X Dock Extension
❑ Boathouse
Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code
The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at
time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checidist is to be completed and submitted with the
application packet. Please provide the submittal Items In the exact order listed below, with cover sheets
attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted.
REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW
COPIES
REQUIRED
REQUIRED
Completed Application (download current form from County website)
i
Property Ownership Disclosure Form
1
Signed and Sealed Survey
❑
[]
❑
Chart of Site Waterway
Site Plan Illustration with the following:
• Lot dimensions;
• Required setbacks for the dock facility;
Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline
(bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment);
Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed
1
❑
❑
facility;
Water depth where proposed dock facility Is to be located;
• Distance of navigable channel;
Illustration of the contour of the property; and
• Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view.
Affidavit of Authorization. signed and notarized
i
®
❑
Cam I d Addressing Checklist
i
®
❑
Electronic copy of all required documents
*Please be advised: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all
i
❑
❑
materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS;
Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit
all materials electronically to the designated project manager.
• Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required.
9/28/2017 Page 5 of 6
Al�.rco.uxty,
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.CWI[ergew net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PE MON NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS:
0
Bayshore/GatewayTriangle Redevelopment:
Executive Director
Environmental Review: See Pre -Application
Meeting 5i -In Sheet
Addressing: Annis Moxam
Graphics: Beth YaDj
Qty of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director
❑
Historical Review
0
Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application
an -in Sheet
E]Meetin
Parks and Recreation: David Berra
❑
Conservancy of SWfL: Nlchole Johnson
r -i
IJ
School District (Residential Components): Amy
Lockheart
County Attorneys Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko
Utilities Engineering. Eric Fey
❑Emergency
Management: Dan Summers; and/or
EMS: Artie Ba
E]
Brett Brett Rosenblum
FEE REQUIREMENTS:
El Boat Dock 15donslon Petition: $1,500.00
❑ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Ibcaminer. $1,125.00
❑ An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the appilcmt prior to the
Hearing Examiner hearing date.
Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of oppikadon submission and those fees are set
forth by the Authorhy having Jurlsdktion. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood
Noiftatibn mailers forApplicatiorts headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing.
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the Information Indicated on this
checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal
information may result in the delay of processing this petition.
A# checks payable to: Board of County Commisssionem.
The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to:
Growth Management Department
Planning and Regulation
ATTN: Business Center
7.500 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Siga of P tioner or Agent
Date
9/28/2017 Page 6 of 6
PRIMARY CRITERIA
The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in
determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing
Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a
particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the
request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the
6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response
to the listed criteria and/or questions.
1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in
relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property;
consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the
primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate;
typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be
one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be
appropriate.)
Response: The total waterfront length for this property is 67 -ft. The zoning and upland land use is
single family residential unit which warrants no more than 2 slips per CC -LDC as well as the approved
PUD. The current proposed dock design has 1 optional boat slip.
2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general
length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor
at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water
depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an
extension.)
Response: See attached survey/drawing illustrating the existing water depths. At the 20 foot
protrusion line taken from the Top of Bank you have approximately 2.7 -feet MLW and are still partially
over the rip -rap. Therefore there is insufficient water depths to moor a vessel or provide safe access
to the docking facility within the 20 -foot protrusion mark.
3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within
an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any
marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.)
Response: The proposed docking facility will not have any adverse impacts on navigation as it will
only protrude 30 -feet from the MHWL into the waterway that is approximately 120 -feet wide from
MHWL to MHWL. The entire waterway is used for navigation as there are no navigational markers
indicating the exact thread of navigation. The proposed docking facility provides adequate space for
navigation through this waterway as well as provides sufficient space for a dock to be built across the
waterway from the subject property and still provide adequate space for navigation.
4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of
the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock
facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should
maintain the required percentages.)
Response: The proposed docking facility protrudes approximately 30 -feet from the MHWL into a
waterway that is 120' wide from MHW to MHW. The proposed dock protrudes approximately 25%
into the waterway and therefore as proposed the dock does meet this criteria.
5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility
would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the
use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
Response: The proposed dock facility will provide 7.5 -foot and 7.5 -foot setbacks from both
property/riparian lines. The approved PUD for the Landings at Sears Paw development only requires
7.5 -feet setbacks for a docking facility that is parallel to the shoreline. The dock design and location
has been designed to be located within the required setbacks, provide safe access with a vessel and
not interfere with any future neighboring docking facilities that maybe constructed.
SECONDARY CRITERIA
1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject
property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock
facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include
type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.)
Response: The proposed dock facility was primarily governed by the County guidelines and the
approved PUD for the Landings at Bear's Paw. The one special condition that has affected the
overall proposed dock design was the relatively high Top of Bank elevation and the associated large
rip -rap shoreline. Due to this condition the proposed access walkway portion of the dock needs to
protrude further out into the waterway in order to decrease the access walkway's slope and reach
adequate water depths.
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for
loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly
related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.)
Response: The proposed dock facility has been minimized in order to meet the County dock
building guidelines as well as to be within the 25% width of waterway. The proposed design is
consistent with the other dock designs that have been approved within this same development. The
design still provides adequate and safe access to and from the vessel while still allowing room for
other recreational use like fishing and kayak/paddle board storage on the dock.
3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in
combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear
waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.)
Response: The proposed dock facility has been designed to only moor one vessel up to 36 -feet which
is more than 50% the subject property's linear waterfront footage. Therefore this criteria is not
met.
4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of
neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the
view of either property owner.)
Response: The proposed dock facility will be one of potentially 11 other single-family docking
facilities allowed to be constructed along this shoreline. The proposed dock has been designed
within the designated setback area as outlined in the approved PUD document for this development.
The proposed docking facility design is consistent with others on this waterway and will not affect
neighboring properties view of the waterway.
5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If
seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03 A6 I must be demonstrated.)
Response: There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties
within 200' of the existing dock structure.
6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of
LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be
demonstrated.)
Response: The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee
Protection Requirements.
PRE -App DOTES
C r It
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 1900 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colilereov.net (239) 252.2400
Pre -Application Meeting Note
Petatiofi Type- BDE
fate and Time' 4/10/2018
Assigned Planner: James Sabo
Engineering Manager (for PPVs and FP°s):
Project Name: Witmbach Dock
Pl, #: 201 I? 17
Property id #:,,5j -1900J(64& Current Zoning: PUD
Project Address: 1684 Vin Wa , City: Na les State: 1=L Zip: 34105
Applicant: Jeff Rogers,
Agent Name: Jef1' Rogen, Phone:
Agent/Firm Address: Y ity p , State:.
Property Amer. Mary A. Nk ambach & Glennon Doylk: Melton
Please provide the following, if applicable:
i. Total Acreage:
ii. Proposed # of Residential Units:
ill. Proposed Commercial Square Footage.
Iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number:
v. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please Indicate the
type and number:
vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/Pi.#:
Updated 4/04//2018 Page 1 1 of 5
coifi�v cmnty
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliaramn (239) 2S2-2400
&SO(almer- smarmatrpn pruvfurlad by s(aff 10 apphr-arY cruring Mo Pro-Apphr.0co Meeting w
based or (he b aV a V-3ARblem d9la Br the 1pn-* o f Me fneemg.;yid.may r;of Ilipy inform 113& appficam
Tile 46ftnis-r-wive CoM-- aoct LDC ariaates' the
An -s- checklivs pmvidad kv ""uired data for ati
Updated 4/04//2018 Page 1 2 of 5
14
Pi kc 2".Ac4itL
IZ 1'� i, jv Q 1
'k
.7.11
&SO(almer- smarmatrpn pruvfurlad by s(aff 10 apphr-arY cruring Mo Pro-Apphr.0co Meeting w
based or (he b aV a V-3ARblem d9la Br the 1pn-* o f Me fneemg.;yid.may r;of Ilipy inform 113& appficam
Tile 46ftnis-r-wive CoM-- aoct LDC ariaates' the
An -s- checklivs pmvidad kv ""uired data for ati
Updated 4/04//2018 Page 1 2 of 5
14
4-
&SO(almer- smarmatrpn pruvfurlad by s(aff 10 apphr-arY cruring Mo Pro-Apphr.0co Meeting w
based or (he b aV a V-3ARblem d9la Br the 1pn-* o f Me fneemg.;yid.may r;of Ilipy inform 113& appficam
Tile 46ftnis-r-wive CoM-- aoct LDC ariaates' the
An -s- checklivs pmvidad kv ""uired data for ati
Updated 4/04//2018 Page 1 2 of 5
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 341014
www.coilleMov.net (239) 252-24010
Other required documentation for submittal (riot listed on application):
DiSginimer h lormalibn provided DY sfall #o ,iIp xcjtrf during M& Pre 4ppff bon M"fin tS
based Qv felt= be!;,. avadab& dols of fl. Ferre of fh� etin, and may earl finny Worra ttxe
appal € l of Issues (rear cnuid ese danng the PfDCO s rrle Adrrwist iva Code and LDC
cf;aatas Me Wiitalrans wt?�C h e)F applrcahc?r; sajF sfy Argy YPeckla cos prnvidod of requued
Clara for an appfkafrorr may not ruiny.60107e whaf ,s aaedad It is thp- applitarrr's rosporsLvilify fo
Updated 4/04//2E118 Page 1 3 of 5
COL'ber county
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
� coiHer ov.net (23911252-2400
Pre -An rplicnfi[ ri K4 -e ing Sign -lin Sheet
PL • 213118(X.)0 1:!.57
Collier County Contact Information:
Name
E Review Discipline
' Phone T Email i
Davici.Anthony
—
Environmental Review
� �
252-2497 j_ david.anthony@coiliereountyt ggav_�1
SummerRraque
I Zoning Division
Environmental Review
252-6290 � summef.brownaraque@colliercountyff.gov
Sue Faulkner
Comprehensive Planner
GMD Operations and
;
Claudine Auelair
252-2924� pi�la,fleishmanRLc lliercountyfl. ov.�
Regulatory ManagementT
— _-
252-5887 Claudine.auelalr@colliereountvfl.gov
Steve Balueh
... �..
`. Transportation planning
-...:.n...��..�.—.��lw—r rte...:.:....... +.._.
252-2361 Stephen.baluch@coiliercountyfl gov
Ray Bellows
Zoning, Planning Manager
2.52.2463 ; raymond.bellows@coiliercountyfl.gov
' Laurie Beard
PUD Monitctnng- _
252-5782 11a urie.beard@colliercountyfi.gov
* T Craig Brown I Environmental Specialist ' 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfi ov
Managing Asst: County
Heidi Ashton Cicko Attorney ` 252-8773 1 heidi.ashton@coliiercounty.gov
Thomas Clarke 4 eratiorss Coordinator 252-2584 ! thomas.clarke@colliercounr gqv
. Kay Deselem Zoning Services 2.52.2586 ' kay.deselem@colliercountvfl.izov
____Rale Fey
! North Collier Fire
597-9227 dfey@northcollierfire.corn
t252-1037
Eric Fey, P:E-
Utility PlanninlL.
; enc.,fey@colliercountyfl-gov
Tim Finn, AlCP
I Zoning Division
-� -252-4312 :imothy.finn@eolliercountyfl.gov
Sue Faulkner
Comprehensive Planner
252-5715 sine.fauikner@collierrv_urt�,gov
Paula Fleishman
r—
I Impact Fee Administration
252-2924� pi�la,fleishmanRLc lliercountyfl. ov.�
Growth Management Deputy
James French
Department Head
252-5717 dames.french@colliercountyfl.gov
Structural/Residential Plan
_
Michael Gibbons
- Review
.... ... w
252-2426: michaei.gibbons@colliercountyfLggy
Storm Gewirtz, P -E.
Engineering Stormwater
252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercaur>tyfl e _ ...
Nancy Gundlach, AICD, PLA' Zoning fJNision 1 2_52-2484_ nanclr gundlach@coiliercouniyfi.gov ^_
Shar Hingson Greater Naples Fire District F774-2800 '�shinssonk0rtnfire.ore
John Houldsworth , Engineering Subdivision 252-5757.'E Lvhn:houldsworth@colliercountO
Jodi Hughes Transportation Pasthways � 252-5744 � jodi.hu�hes@colliercountyfl.gov
,,._. _ _i _ ..__ _....
L---- Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting ; 252-2326 alicia.humtahries@colliercountvfl.,
1Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov
_ 4.. _
John Kelly ZoninSenior Planner -� 252-5719 john.keliy@colliercountyfl.gov _
' Thomas Mastroberto �:Greater Napes Fare _ 252-7348 thomas.ma-,troberto@colliercountyfl.gov
Jack McKenna, P.E.Engineering Services 1 252-2911
Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov j
Michele Mosta, AICP iCapitaI Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfi.gov 1
Updated 4/04//201.8 Page 1 4 of 5
C0811,; -Y county
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
WWW.collftov,ne't (2399) 252-2400
Annis Moxam Addressing 252-551.9 annis.moxam@coiliercountyfl.gov
Stefanie Nawrocki Development Review Zoning
Richard C?rth l Stormvuater Planning
Otero Transit
Brandi Pollard Utility Impact. fees
_ Todd Ri&gall North Collier Fire
252-2313 stefanie.nawrocki@colliercountyfl.gov
252-5092^richard.orth@colliercountvfi eov
252-58.59
i 252-4237 1 brandkpoilard@colliercoun gov
597.9227 1 triggall@northcoliierfire.com
Daniel roman, P.E.Z ngineerin iJtilities 252-2538 daniel.roman@colliercoun!A.gov
__..
i Development Review
F Brett Rosenblum, P.E,. .t Principal Protect Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercoun gov
James Sabo, AICD _Zoning l�rinci ai Planner "ames.sabo@colliergo,net
W — _- . _ -
Michaei Sawyer ...... ( Transportation Planning 252-2926. michael.sa er@coilierceun ov
Corby Schmidt, AICD � Comp Planning 252-2944 curbyschmidt@colliercountyfl. ov
Chris Scott, AICD i Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 ' chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov
Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shaw!q!!�y@colliercountyfl.gov i
Camden Smith Zoning Division_Operatons I. 252-1042 �camd+en.smith@colliercountyfLgov
Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney _ 252-5740 scoit.stone@�colllercoun I. ov
8
i . Mark Strain Hearn Examiner(CC17C . 252-4446 • mark.strain@coiliercountyfl. ov
MarkTempleton Landscape Review ` 252.-247`5 mark.tempieton@calliertc�urrtyfi.gov I
_ _. �.�
Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 1 252-2584 , jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov
Jon Walsh, P.E. _ Buildin Review `� 252-2962 1 ionathan.waish@colliercountyfi.gov
I Comprehensive Planning I —
David Weeks, AICP I Future Land Use ConMsiency 252-2306 ! david weeks@colllercountyfi,gov
Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518: kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.zov
�_. Christine Willoughby— Development Review - Zoning 25L574B 1 ehrisbne willoughiay@coiiiercountyfii,gov
Additional Attendee Contact Information:
Name
Representing-'
Phone Email
I
Updated 4/04//2018 Page 1 5 of 5
Residential Boat Dock Extension Checklist FOR REVIEWERS
Submerged Resources !gun vChecklist
I . Is there an overlay? S'l oxerla- needs an SI permit (much of Isle of Capri & Keeway din has an ST
Overlay over the watet)�Fl- -
G.,. Include an aerial with a note indicating Whether seagrass beds exist within =UU feet ofthe proposed
dock fac:altty.. (LDC" 5.03.06 J)
Provide a submerged rGti,►urc�� suet ev from an Lm irortrnental Consultant clone between April and
Ol;04 ,r,
Polis ern Requirement fin requiring Submerged Resources Suree (t ctoher 2017):
+ Require for all Beat Bock petitions -
4lwa�s require an aerial with a note indicating, �Nhether seagrass beds exist within -100 t:`'zt of the
proposed dock fteility.
N11 proTmsed deck facilities shall be located and alignccl to :eta, at least ten feet from ani° existing
seagrass bed i. or meet restrictions for cuattinuous beds. ( LDC 5.03.06 J. l P53U
4.. Provide complete ansrkc:rs to Criteria =a5 & 4.6. 1 t:sC INESc in CV )
, 5 . Demonstrate ho%- negativ; impacts to bt sagra%, beds Lind uthet natlNv slioroline vvgerwuon and hard
bottom co m ur►tties have been minimized. t LDC 5.03 i6 J .41 P530
ii. Provide a clearing plan hir removal of any xcgeiati.on related to the boat dock. pais is simply an
' information exhibit beinV , -quested.
7. Are there ant draii rt-strictions7 Look at the MPP.
Draft restrictions c-,.i.st lilt Wiggins Pa: -,s.
Keewkydin. BDE" not re4uired for Kee�Navdjn
Most always need an S"l pt;rmit tvlated tc� a building Permit— xvatez <�n�i land have '� I' t3vcgrla)
5eagrass. Light penetration is needed to sun it e.. usuall- to mare sh;alloNx areas
Submerged Resources SUn7eV:
- Read thorough]%
- ChccL location description lZir stied &: %% at%:nN uN t if giN enj
- Check to see if it was uploaded to CV
lndicatc in C,N...Cnnunw►ars box' if one kvab, clone K if it was uploaded to CV
''�***SLLSUGGE'SrED fOR.NIAT'OF SUBIM .R6 DRLSO `RCLS St�RVFY Dti NLXT f'ACi '""
MULTI SLIP DOCKING FACILITY'
• Look at supplemental criteria in 5.05 02
o Port of the Islands 'uses different Rating system — see MPP
• See 5.03.06 E 11 and 5.05.02 for Manatee awareness requirements for multi -slip docking facilities
Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of bubsectaon
5 03.06(F)t11) of this LDC. (if applicable. compliance vviih �Rectiun 5.03.06(E)( l 1) roust be
demonstrated).
SUGGESTED FQIVNIAT AND I: FORMATION TO INCLUDE IN
S[�BMERGFD RESEILRCES SURVEY
Location of survey - property address and folio:-,
o The survey shall indicate any seagrass of seagrass beers located within 200 tuet on any proposed
dock.. facility (5-03,06J). In order for this io he accomplished. any within 200 feet of the
proposed dock (within the riparian lines of the property and adjacent to the property) shall be
surae ved.
r Who dict the survey - which firm and their contact information Including name. addres';, phone f. email
r What date vcas the survey conducted? Guidance from FWC is to dry between .April mid October
o Weathcr conditions, water temperature. lova title: & high tide.= tjni�:
; Objective of 5w ve& Work done on the site
o Was tho site: snorkcleel?
o 'What methodologies wore used''
o Was a GPS used'?
o Was an aerial photograph ravickhod acid usedto establish sua vc} transect lines'!
r Results
o What vvas found'? Substrate and what kind? 4eagrass, shoal. oysters'
o What was alum the shoreline" Mangroves. scaxxvall, ete"
o Why does the consultant think net submerged resource; vvere found?
o Other obs *rvatioms
�- W"hen seagrasG is found. include: all reguincmi is of l:M section 5.43.1)6. J.
:•• Conclusions
o Were any submerged resources found' If 4es. what'
a Are any impacts to submerged resources cvpcctcd or proposed''
Pictures (suggested angles)
o Looking toward, and away horn they shoreline
o The proposed locadon of the boat aece:ss
o Observations in the water -.Any of std.r dcbriti. shell, seagrass
hcria.l photograph
o Where ncw docking facilities or haat dock exte nsioni are proposed. the Iocation and presence of
seagrass or seagrass bed-, vvithin 2t10 feat ofunN prupobe>d clock facility shall be i:ierrtiried on an
aerial photograph hav ing a kale of 1 inch to 2100 fe,!t when available 1110m the County. or a scale
of 1 inch to 4UU feet whom such photographs are not ;available: from the County. (LDC 5.03M.J)
o An aerial is required even when seagr ss'. s are: not f4rtind. The: acrial shall indicate; whether
seawasscs were round v.ithin 200 fact ut ticc proposed clock facility.
5.03 06. J. (LDC section tip to date as of 2016)
Protection of seagrass beds. Seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 filet of any proposed docks, d"k facilities, or
boathouses shall be protected through the following standards -
1 Where new docking facilities or haat dock extensions are proposed, the location and presence of seagrass or
seagrass beds within 200 feta of any proposed duck faciljty shall be identified on an aerial photograph having a
scale of 1 inch to 200 feet when available from the County: or a scab: of I inch to 400 feet when such
photographs are not avaiiaole trom the County. The location of seagrass beds shall be verified by the County
Manager or designee prior to issuance of any project approval or permit.
2. Ali proposed dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least 10 feet from any existing seagrass beds,
except where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the share of the property and adjacent to the property,
and to minimize negative impacts to seagrasses and other native shoreline, emergent and submerged
vegetation, and hard bottom communities_
3. Where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the share of the property and adjacent to the property, the
applicant shalt be allowed to build a duck .across the seagrass beds, or a docking facility within 10 feet of
seagrass beds. Such :locking facilities shall comply with the following conditions:
a_ The dock shall be at a height of at least 3.5 feet NGVD.
b. The terminal platform area of the dock shall not exceed 150 square feet.
c. The access dock shall not exceed a width of 4 feet.
d_ The access deck anti terminal platform shalt be sited to impact the smallest area of seagrass beds
possible.
4. The petitioner shall be required to demonstrate how negative impacts to seagrass beds and other native
shoreline vegetation and hard bottom communities have been minimized prior to any project approval or permit
issuance.
CE1LUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES. FLORIDA 34104
w-colliergov.net (239) 2.52-2400 FAX. (239) z52-63SS
iiG-A#+hca ilYrn mei<i.'IM1
r tic wunuwing suumiuEar nequrrernent c.necKiist is to De utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at
time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the
application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets
attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted.
OF
REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW
PIESREQUIRED
OT
REQUIRED
Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1
P. ,i'ipe�._..." ivUr—m—shi�k.Ai 1
FLlI
Signed and Sealed Survey ❑
❑
El
Chart of Site Waterway
Site Flan Illustration with the following:
• Lot dimensions;
• Required setbacks for the dock facility;
• Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline
(bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment);
• Configuration. location, and dimensions of existing and proposed i
facility;
• Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located;
• distance of navigable channel;
• Illustration of the contour of the property; and
• Illustration of dock facility from bath an aerial and side view.
!� frdavi4 of Au l .::+�� ,t , signed and notarized
1
�
❑
CgMplpJ G Agdres4, n f*hec0s
Electronic copy of all required documents
*Please be advised. The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all
®'
❑
materials to be submitted electronically in RDF format
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING, PROCESS,
• Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall subm17
all materials electronically to the designated project manager.
Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required.
9/28/2017 Page 5 of 6
t.
r
'Cmitty
COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 28120 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.riet 1239) 252-2400 FAY: (239) 252-6358
PLANNERS _ INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS:
E Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment:
l Executive Director
I W .Addressing, Annis Moxam —
City of Naples, Robin Singer, Manning Director
Comprehensive Planning: See Pre Application
i Meeting Sign -in Sheet
Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson
s Office. Heidi Ashton-Cicko
Environmental Review, See Pre -Application
Meettng Sign -in Sheet
Graphics. Beth Yang
�]
Historical Review _
❑ Parks and Recreation: David Berra
0 School Distritt (Residential Components): Amy i
Lockheart l
Utilities Engineering' Eric Fev
Emergency Management:. Dan Summers, and/or ' —
EMS: Artie Sav ❑ r Engineering. Brett Rosenblum
FEE REQUIREMENTS-
Boat Dock Extension Petitiont, $1,500.00
Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00
An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the
Hearing Examiner hearing date,
Fire Cade Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set
forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Cade requires Neighborhood
Notrftcation mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this, fee is collected prior to hearing:
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this
checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to.. include all necessary submittal
information may result in the delay of processing this petition.
All checks paryab% to. Board of County Commissioners.
The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to:
Growth Management Department
Planning and Regulation
ATi"N: Rosiness Center
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL .34104
Signature of Petitioner or Agent pate
9/28/2017 Page 6 of 6
ADDRESSING CHECKLIST
corer County
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliergov.net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724
ADDRESSING CHECKLIST
Please complete the following and email to GMD Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division
at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by
Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, Please allow 3 days for processing.
Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE
PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section.
PETITION TYPE (indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type)
❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan)
BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDPAmendment)
❑ CamivaVCircus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP)
❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan)
❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP)
❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change)
❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted)
❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights)
❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance)
❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit)
❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit)
❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description maybe attached)
LANDINGS AT BEAR'S PAW LOT 20 S35 T49 R25
FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one)
54490010546
STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned)
1684 Vinland Way Naples, FL 34105
• LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right-
of-way
• SURVEY (copy needed only for unplatted properties)
CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable)
Wambach Melton Dock
PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable)
PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable)
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects1sites only)
SDP-- orAR or PL # 20180001257
Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2
C; ler County
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.collier og .net
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724
Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application;
indicate whether proposed or existing)
Wambach Melton Dock
Please Return Approved Checklist By: Q Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up
Applicant Name: Jeff Rogers
Phone: 239-643-0166 Email/Fax: Jeff@thanaples.com
Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name
approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Folio Number 54490010546
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Approved
Updated by: Date:
3/30/2018
IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED
Rev. 5/9/2017 Page 2 of 2
PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE FORM
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colliemay.net
C; Aer caounty
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252.6358
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM
This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification
Letters.
Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the
date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the
applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form.
Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary.
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL. tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in
common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership Interest as well as the
percentage of such interest:
Name and Address
% of Ownership_
Mkt 41 6 474-9
L6Nki 4N
1(o gLi v it, an
J.& 3 n
If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the
percentage of stock owned by each:
Name and Address % of Ownership
C. If the property is in the name of a IRUSTEE list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
oTinterest:
I_ Name and Address E % of Ownership I
Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3
..40"w �Couwty
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
. IIi (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the
general and/or limited partners:
Name and Address % of Ownership
e. if there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE with an individual or individuals, a Corporation,
Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the
Wricers, stocKnolders, beneficiaries, or partners:
__ Name and Address % of Ownership
Date of Contract:
f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or
Tocers, IT a corporation, partnership, or trust,
Name and Address
g. Date subject property acquired
❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months
If, Petitioner has option to buy, Indicate the following:
Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.coliiemm.net
Date of option:
Co . r Canty
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34204
(239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
Date option terminates: , or
Anticipated closing date:
AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
Any petition required to have Property Ownership Dlstlosure, will not be accepted without this form.
Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change In ownership whether
Individually or with a Trustee, Company or other Interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County
Immediately If such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing.
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, i attest that all of the Information Indicated on this checklist is
included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result
in the delay of processing this petition.
The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to:
Growth Management Department
A1TN: Business Center
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Ag ner nature p e
_oA c-..
Agent/Owner Na a (please tint)
Creates! 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3
AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION
AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION
FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) "f
I, r1'I A (print name), as (title, if
applicable) of (company, If applicable), swear or affirm
under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicantOcontract purchasermand that:
1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on
the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this
application and the Land Development Code;
2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter
attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true;
3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours
for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that
4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and
restrictions imposed by the a proved a on.
5. Well authorize c fr J1 !i c . Lnc. _ to act as our/my representative
in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above.
*Notes.
• If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pros.
• If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L_C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should
typically be signed by the Company's 'Managing Member."
• If the applicant Is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership.
• If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be Identified as the "general
partner" of the named partnership.
• If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trusteeA
• In each Instance, first determine the applicant's status, e_g_, individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then
use the appropriate format for that ownership.
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that
the facts stat rue
1Z �
Sirmature Date
OF FLORIDA
Y OF COLLIER
The foregoing instrument was swom to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on f I lAtm (date) by
nA41'P1 U)arskr' n 4. 64e Inrton b , Wko!�sr, (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as
who is personally known to me or who has produced s'7t'_ b.r c
(type of identification) as identification.
STAMPISEAL Signature of Notary Pubt
LEE M. RUSSELL
_ MYCOMMISSION#GG 125924
EXPIRES: October 80, 2011
Bonded fico Pu61k Undenwiters
CPU-COA-001151155
REV 3/24/14
DRAWINGS
STATE OF FLCDRI DA
CITY
COLLIER COUNTY
SITE ADDRESS:
0 1684 VINLAND WAY
NAPLES, FL 34105
T MYERS"
�r�fit� M
( WEST r d
.welQ
r •i. *r a• .r� .
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
m �
r.rtw.a l , i
w •�
rA ; V
VICINITY MAP
NOTES:
— THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
— LATITUDE: N 26.187098
<> LONGITUDE: W 81.781034
• --'�!_ !. �S;-rf `::t orf '
'7ffamm
Up
COUNTY /-SERIAL
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. WA M B AC H —MELT 0 N
Marine & Enviro�nenW Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104 3732 LOCATION MAP
Email' 1moa�Wrtel4aalaciates,com Phone: (239} 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-0632
DESIGNED:
SEC711-I0N-35 TOWNSHIP -495 F:ANCE-25E
s
U
SIM ADDRESS: 1
1684 VINLAND WAY
NAPLES, FL 34105
s' PROPERTY LINE: �J
EXISTING `
:y TOP OF BANK AND
y RIP FV4
APPROX -
MIW -1.53'
(NAVD '88)
L
'; rE
APIPPOIX V*
10-11W 0.44'(NAVD r
18M r=j
fo 40
sc�,c��Nr
s ADJADENT
EX19TING ,- {'
RIP RAP" sic DOCK
Ty It
` : uRIPARIAN LINT=
}C :: x .1 r 7G I
XA,
Xr#f.� s
X-;} as x s4 XA-
ti� SF +a
TOE OF RSA RAP 4 .
= ay{ L 7C r .
X 49
X4 x 4k
XAF
RIPARIAN LINE X -r'
X4, }[ f
;CA r
X 137
Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. WA M BAC H— M E L T O N
�-c Marine 8c Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Ave. Suite S. Naples, FL 34164 3732
EXISTING SITE
DESIGNED: I aR
3-NEET NO.: OZ OF OB 6.
SECTION -35 TOWNSHIP -49S RANGE -25E
5
APPROX -
MIW -1.53'
(NAVD'88)
-000
' J .
SITE ADDRESS:
1684 VINLAND WAY
NAPLES, FL 34105
�f
1 lffff
PROPERT '..'NE
5
l
-i
T .k
2.11--
0
0 ro go 40
J°C7�C£ 9Tl PEE`T
i
k
• WIDTH OF WATERWAY.
MHW TO MHW (APP)g.
APPROX
MHW 0.44�(�1lD ✓
.88)�
40000
ADJACENT
1 DOCK
NOTES:
THESE DRA,M1BN03 ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
` ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCEDTO MLW
DEPTHS SURVEY COURTESY OF
SURVEY DATED:
SHORELINE SURVEY COURTESY OF. Agnoll, BxHiar, Onndw, Inc
• SURVEY DATED. toa9.mt2
• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF):
.
'
• WIDTH OF WATERWAY.
MHW TO MHW (APP)g.
TIDAL DATUM
•• MLW (NAVD).
YYY
MHW (NAVDj-
J'
Turrell Hall &Associates Inc.
Marine & Environmental Consultiing
Alm
WA M BAC H —MELTON
DESIGNED: �R
a o,B
3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732
LOT DIMENSIONS
JOB NO.: 0m.8
4.
SHEET NO.: W OF BB
5.
°mail: hm@tmlell-mxiates m Phane:(239)64MI66 Fax: (239) 643-6632
SECTION -35
TOWNSHIP -49S RANGE -25E
SITE ADDRESS:
1684 VINLAND WAY
NAPLES, FL 34105
:21193»ArA41z1:4
� � u
• � `y + 1
` EXISTING}
TOP OF BANK OP S GO /
AND RIP RAP a a a �2 TO%OF
AA a�'- RIP
fl
05 d
ADJACENT
DOCK
O� ` RIPARIAN
G
• a 2 /
12'X14' RIPARIAN LINE
�►PPROX OPTIONAL ` SETBACK
BOAT LIFT
MLW -1.54'
(NAND '88) / � ` 61-
� FIXED DOCK / 33 Notes:
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PFRMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
` ARE NC(f INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
ALL DATUM SHOWM HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
/ DEPTHS SURVEY COURTESY OF: Court Ongory Surveying, Ine.
SURVEY DATED 08.193018
RIPARIAN LINE / SHORELINE SURVEY COURTESY OF- Agnall, Berber, Omnaege, hm
SURVEY DATED: 104)1,M2` • •• PROTRUSION FROM MHWL 1•
/ • APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 87•
• VWDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APP -4 121.8•
•
PROPOSED UO�'R WATER STRUCTS (SO FTI yu
RIPARIAN LINE SETBACK / •� TIDAL DATUM:
25% WIDTH OF MHW(NAVD)- 9u
WATERWAY
DESIGNED: 'ORS -2&18
,.
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. WAM BAC H —M E LTO N C�TEo RO&?&,a 3. _
Marine & Environmental Consulting JOB NO.: 0805.8 4.
3584 Rebange Ave. Suite B. Naptes,FL34t04-3732 PROPOSED DOCK 9HEETNO.: D4 OF 08 a
E1081I:111Ba@Wmfi48.90LT810Sx4m Phone:(W)643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-0632 SEQTION-35 TOWNRAN¢E-25E
' PROPOSED
HAND RAIL. •
SrrE AIDDRESS:
1B84 VINLAND WAY
NAPLES, FL 34105 y.-
€ ` PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING
TOP OF BANK
AND RIP RAP 00 ;
C
AWOX
-MHW 0.44'(
'88)
Q m S
ADJACENT
DOC K
%�1 a
TOE OF
RIS' RAP
;,
' t�RIPARLAN LINE
•.5 , XAQ
X -a F
I
12'}(14'
OPTIONAL .
BOAT LIFT
�}r X
)c 5 r
X40 1
+ r3 rNOTES:
S 7 j r IX ED DOCKTHESE DRAYNNG9 ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
6�-y • ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
APPROX ALTMSHONHEONREFEREENETO MLW
LTA ' R OFnpeySun
",In.bW i
SURVEY DATED: 03-09.2076
r NA VD ' 68 5 SHOREUNE SURVEY COURTESY
OF: Agnoll, Owbu, Bmn'
da
ge, nt
SURVEY DATED70439.332
x-, 11 PROTRUSION FROM MHWL30
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINEy
_ • WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW "P q: 727.3'
' • TIPROPOSED
O P SED OVER WATER STRUCTURE {80 Fn 532
RIPARIAN LINE_r '"
25% WIDI'll OF MLfWwc�- 4.6
*, f WATERWAY x.s
, Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 'DESIDNED+JR
AMBACH—MELTON DRWNa RMJ
Madne OEnvimmnenlal ryonm1fing Jog N 0003.
.3 4,.1)<7ma-7584EacWVAve.suite
B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 PROPOSED DOCK WITH DEPTHS SHEETNO.: 05 OF 05 5.
Fanail:taaa@0PJI-WWift= Phone:(239)643-0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION -36 TQWN$NIP-495 RANGE -25E
EXISTING
TOP OF
RIPRAPI
PROPERTY
LINE
SECTION A -A
a z ro
46ACT9N r
12'
21'
F PROPOSED HAND RAIL
r— FIXED DOCK
EXISTING
RIP RAP
42'
gel ky, I WITJ 1111 =Z6S -tM11 1
6' —1
TOE OF RIP RAP
14' BOAT LIFT
it 7%
c�
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. WAM BAC H — M E LTO N
Marine & Environmental Consulting
3504ExchengeAve. Suite H. Naples, FL 34104.3732 CROSS SECTION
Email' tma@mndl,aaeociatesmm Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 64W32
MBIGNEDc
MLW-1. 4 (NAVD't3t3)
O
ALL PILES TO BE WRAPPED
FROM 6" BELOW SUBSTRATE
TO 12" ABOVE MHW
SECTION -35 TOWNSHIP -49S RANGE -25E
v
!t
PROPERTY LINE -
' IMRVVL
# r
OA
THREAD t]w=
NAVrATION . ,
N
_PA/
o go foo zoo
` Opp 6 v
s A
NOTES:
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE,
ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON 18 REFERENCED TO MLW
DEPTHS SURVEY COURTESY OF' Court GrWary Suneykg, Inc.
SURVEY DATED: 06184015
• •• SHORELINE SURVEY COURTESY OF, A6nnll, Baber, Bnvwk4p, Inc.
SURVEY DATED- 20-08.601:
• •• PROTRUSION FROM MHWL 30'
APPLICANT OWNED SHOREUNE (APPX LF): 67'
• WIOTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APP)): 121.0'
•
PROPOSED
942OVER WATER STRUCTURE (80 FT). y
!� TIDAL DATUM
A •:: MLW(NAVD)- 1.63'
MHW pwwY 6.ee�
Turrell, Hal&Associates,W
—
EIOEDJR
_
_-
MXP
613..
( & EnvironmenaConsulting
66Marine
3584 Exchange Ave, Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732
ADJACENT DOCKS IN CANAL
jmN.: --,.
SHEET NO.; 107 OF 06
14.
15.
Faaeil:ta QtmU4qsmats.= Phone: (239)6434166 Fax: (239)643-02.,••..•..,
•••• •• . •d... ..• •...��
SECTION -35
TOWNSHIP -49S FtAt4GE-25E
SITE ADDRESS.
1684 VINLAND WAY
NAPLE=S, FL 34105,
y
PROPERTY LINE
r lq� 30
scatc��r
PROPOSED DOCK
NO b-EHkjrAssts wEKt.
{
OBSERVED GROWING
WITHIN 200 FT OF THE
'00' f PROPOSED PROJECT_
r
qopol
r r
r
rt
r
r
yr NOTES: —
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
DEPTHS SURVEY COURTESY OF- Court Grapey Surveying, lnc.
SURVEY DATED: W49-2015
•• SHORELINE SURVEY COURTESY OF, Agnal, Sarber, Brundage, Inc.
SURVEY DATED: 10-002017
PROTRUSION FROM MHWL 30'
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 17.
• WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APP)); 171N
• PROPOSED OVER WATER STRUCTURE (SO FTy "2
• TIDAL DATUM:
•. MLW(NAVD)- 443'
•• MHW MAVDI- n u
�==
_ Turrell Hall &Associates Inc.
DE8IGNE@
JR
1.
—' WAM BAC H --MELTON
DRAWN BY:
RMJ
2 _
� � Marine &Environmental Consulting
CREA,IL:
o3 -se -18
a
35848xchBngeAve.SuiteB, Napies,FL341043732 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
JOB NO.:
OSHA
0. - _
SHEET NO,
n,�FOB
1
EIImi1; Dma�hulell aasociateacpm PhDge: {239}643 0166 Fax: (239)643 632
SECTION- 35
TC WNSH IP- 49 8 RANGE- 25 E
SURVEY
SCALE 1" = 40'
i
FIRC 818
06m)
LO 1T 9
I� e
(I MPROV NTS NOTSHOWN)
LOT 20
MWAINS 0.28 ACRES OF
LAND MORE OR LESS)
mum
FEWX
F
'O
MOA
M
'IRC)W
MN
AW$
Ew4
SLOE W_
@LEV.
RIPAiIiAN L
BENCHMARK
SPKN&D
(#am)
cfL. = &W
PAGE 1 OF 3
BOUNDARY INFORMATION FURNISHED BY CLIENT.
SEE ATTACHED PAGE 2 AND 3
FOR DEPTHS AND LARGER
SCALED DRAWING.
LOT 21
1
or M"
pwa
IRC waP
l)
10' L.B.E.
Wy
WARIAN LINE
1✓ f ' .. ` ` 90TTWOF (4W OMY)
�., P9PRgp l+OWV�A7 TFM8LWq
WOW ROOK
MID SCAT 4Fi
(Um DNLr) 121.$' MHW UNE /
TO MHW LINE / /
X = DENOTED SPOT ELEVATION (NAVD 1988) WOW /
TRACT *W /
(COMMON AREAS D.E.) /
/
/ /
.00I
GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
M.H.W.
.01
/
/
1$L7 D.E.
O.R. 900K 121, PG.139
NOTES:
1,THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED
ON THE CENTERLINE OF VINLAND WAY
AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 68 PAGE 6
OF COLLIER COUNTY, BEING NORTH 64D W OF EAST,
2.I1MPROVENENTS OTHERTHAN THOSE SHOWN
ARE NOTA PART OFTHIS SURVEY.
S.SAID DESCRIBED LAND IS SUBJECT TO ALL SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONB,ZONING AND
RIGHTS -OF- WAY OF RECORD.
4.0ATE OF FIELD SURVEY FEBRUARY 22, 2D18.
&THIS SURVEY MAP IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE
AND RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR
AND MAPPER. ADDrnONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS
OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SKMM PARTY OR
PARTIES IS PROHIBfTED VWTHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
OF THE SIONNO PARTY OR PARTIES.
$.SUSSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONINTIONS WERE
NOT EXAMINED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY. NO STATEMENT
IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND
OR OVERHEAD CONTAINERS, UTILITIES OR FACILITIES THAT
MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY
72MATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON N.A.V.D. DATUM OF 1988.
DESCRIPTION OF SM AS FOLLOWS: SPKNDI2 $0041N NORTH 2 FT
VALLEY GUTTER OPPOSITE SITE. ELEV. = 8.8R NAVD SO)
&SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN FLOOD ZONE WA
AS SHOWN ON FEMA MAP PANEL 1
ISLAND, BASE ELEVATION DETERMBNED AT NIA
ALL FEMA INFORMATION SHOWN NEEDSTO BE VERIFIED BYTHE
USER(S) OF THIS SURVEY, BEFORE ANY DESIGN ANDIOR
CONSTRUCTION.
ONO TITLE OPINION OR ABSTRACT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
HAS BEEN PROVIDED. ALL INFORMATION HAS SEEN SUPPLIED
BY THE CLIENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THATTHERE ARE DEEDS,
EA$EIuIE M, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS (RECORDED OR
UNRECORDED) WHICH MAY AFFECT THE SIJWWT PROPERTY.
NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN MADE BY THE
SURVEYOR
10.THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE EXIS'IM
SHORELINE CONDITIONS AND DEPTHS IN RELATION TO THE
PROPERTY LINES. PROPERTY LINES ARE SHOWN AS PLAT.
REVISIONS
LEGEND
0 . FOND I') IRON ROD (SURVEYOR ID#) (FIR)
*-SEI'112" IRON ROD(PSMIR$pW)(SIRC)
8 - SET 4" X 4' CONCRETE MONUMENT (PSM M=XSCM)
O = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (SURVEYOR IDSXFCM)
*' BENCHMARK (FOUND OR SEI) R1W = RIGHT OF WAY(R.O.W.)
0 ■ FOUND NAIL OR PK NAIL AND DISC ( SURVEYOR ID F) (FPI"
(10 ■ SET PK NAIL AND DISC (PSM 18004)SSPKNSD) FD.: FOUND
FM&TT - FOUND NAIL AND TIN TAB BM re BENCHMARK
(M) a FIELD MEASUREIiIENT (C) a CALCULATED MEASUREMENT
P.G.P. = PERMANENT CONTROL POINTO) C.L = CENTERLINE
P.R,M ," PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT (11) (PG) . PAGE
(P) OR (D) - PLAT OR RECORDED(DEED) MFASUREMENT
(PB) ■ PLAT BOOK PL EXT. PROPERTY LINE EXTENDED
CMP a CORRUGATED METAL. PIPE CATV -CABLE TV
=FI?NISHMPLOOR U.T.S.=UMTEDTELEPHONERISER
WELL CONC -CONCRETE CB -CATCH BASIN OR INLET
a WATERIGATE VALVE R.C.P. = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
S SANITARY SEINER PROP = PROPERTY X - SPOT ELEVATION
TDP OF BANK TOS: TOP OF SLOPE EOW = EDGE OF WATER
808. BOTTOM OF BANK BOS a BOTTOM OF SLOPE EO - EDGE OF
CBS -CONCRETE BLOCK 8 STUCCO VG =VALLEY GUTTER
ELEC. -ELECTRIC TRANS S TRANSFORMER JAC - JACI rrnl
DE - DRAINAGE EASEMENT SINE = SIDEWALK EASEMENT
ESE ■LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT IE ■ IRRIG. EASEMENT
PUE . PUBLIC VnLITY EASEMENT UE = UTILITY EASEMENT
LMA(E)■ LAKE MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT
LME - LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT AE.aACCESS EASEMENT
MAP OF
C PURPOSE SURVEY
OF
LOT 20
OF
LANDINGS AT BEAR'S PAW
AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 56 PAGE(S) 5-6
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
1684 VINLAND WAY
CERTIFY TO:
TURRELL, BALL & ASSOCIATES
CERTIFICATION:
CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
IIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF
SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER W-17,
DAADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION
7, FLORIDA STATUTES.
CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR
IOM OF ENCUMBRANCES.
Digitally signed byCmrt H.
Gregory
Dlk m=Court K Gregory,
o courtGregory Surveying
r�t>6�r Inc,ou,
emall-egs60D4@mm®sLnet
,c=U
Date: 2019A7.2711:3959
SIGNED -mcl.
COURT H. GREGORY PSM #8004
DATE 02/22/2018
DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 02-22-2018
PSM # 6004
LS # 7112
(#;o
Gregory Surveying,
761 Teton Court
Naples, Florida 34104
(239)643.7845 office
Date 0212612018
og98004QcomcasLnet
Job #EN102D2M
(2027"2-3707 cell
Fb ENI -8 Pg 14
r ---•jP +r --
(VACANT)
LOT 19
SCALE 1" = 20'
PAGE 2 OF 3
� 1�
TOP OF
RIPRAP
w �
F /
X67 X1;5
•3754.0
-3.5 -4.2 -5.5
i� . -3.7 -4.2 -5.1
-5.3 -6.2
7.3 -8.4
17m
-8.2 -8.5 s
-5.5
-4.8 : ` . -5.2 . -5.0 7.i).: -7.8 '--.,-6.4 -8.6 000
::•-4.4 -4.7-5.7 -7.0` -7,2 .:; -8.1 -8.7
-5.3 -7. Y : -7.1 .:.: -8.7 i
i
-7.5 ;' .-7.5 : -7.5 -7-7 -8 4 �7i x-87
.::-7.6 7.9 -8.6
..? •- -8.5
7.3 :-7.7 ;. -8.6
-7.4 /
-8.0 I' i 6 46
�" •. -8.2
-8.8
O" 7.9
i
f -8.6
00 ".. -8.2
i
GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL
/
X = DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION NAVD 1988
M.H.W. /
ELEV. = 0.44'/
MAP OF
IECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY
OF
LOT 20
OF
LANDINGS AT BEARS PAW
AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 56 PAGE(S) 5.6
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
1654 VINLAND WAY
CERTIFY TO:
TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES
CERTIFICATION -
1 CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
DIRECTION AND THAT ff MEETS THE STANDARDS OF
PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 6J-17,
FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION
ZONING, EASEMENTS OR
aeWN.�4'�W[anikr pq
yy ,F 'I dl: a..Cart H.61e9zK o-Cwrt
(..A..r Fi"YCW�pr 61Ww151n i�91�w.
mvikW�Opl@cannsuiel WS
!)al,.l01B �3i 11M1:f3-01'00'
SIGNED
COURT H. GREGORY PSM #8004
DATE 02/26/2018
DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 02-22-2018
PSM # 6004
LB # 7112
c.c.s.
Gregory Surveying,
761 Teton Court
Naples, Florida 34104
(239)643-7845 once Date 0=6P1018
ogs6004gcomcastnet Job # EN10202M
(239)272-3707 cell Fb EN 1-6 Pg 14
(VACANT)
LOT 19
SCALE 1" = 20`
,a
!o
J
2z
PAGE 3OF3
4
ROT AP
I
6l A.
r r X 0.0
ri r rl .
4.2
r r O.�re'•�' .';1.2 2.0-2.5
-2.7 -4.0
r i `-1.3. =1.5 -3.8 -4.3
-2.2 -2.7
0.2 ; � :.. -3.6
-2.2 ; -3.0 s 3 a -4.7
-4 0
-3 8
-4.0 )k
-4.0 -6.7 .-7.0
-2.8 ` ` -3.3 -3.7
-2.9 :. -3.2 : -4.2 5 5; .-6.7 .::'-7.2 r
r
-6.0 -0.0
i
.47 ':.- -6.9'
r -7.1 .
-6.8 ��'�`7.0
-5-8 -8.2 r -7.1
-6.7
-6.4
-7.0 -7.1
.•.-8.1 � � -7.2
r
-7.3
r
� r
X = DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL r
REFERENCED TO MLW (-1.54) M.H.W_ r
r
i
ELEV. = 0.4-V r r r r
r r �
r r r
r / y
f �
MAP OF
IECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY
OF
LOT 20
OF
LANDINGS AT BEARS PAW
AS RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 56 PAGE(S) 6.5
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
1684 VINLAND WAY
CERTIFY TO:
TURRELl., HALL $ ASSOCIATES
CERTIFICATION:
I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
ORECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF
PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYORSAND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J-17.
FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION
ZONING, EASEMENTS OR
PSM # 6004
LB # 74'2
C.G.S.
Gregory Suwejying, 1
761 Teton Court
Naples, Florida 34104
(239)643-7846 office Date 02/26/2018
cgs6004@co mcast.ne1 Job # EN10202M
(239)272-3707 cell Fb EN1-6 Pg 14
Dlgltallysigned by Court H.
Gregory
DN: cndourt H. Gregory,
o=CourtGregory 5urmying
Inc, au.
email=cgOONL5com®rt.ne
t, SUS
Date: 2018.07.27 1141:52
SIGNED
x,1,001
COURT H. GREGORY
PSM #6004
DATE 02/26/2018
DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 02-22-2018
PSM # 6004
LB # 74'2
C.G.S.
Gregory Suwejying, 1
761 Teton Court
Naples, Florida 34104
(239)643-7846 office Date 02/26/2018
cgs6004@co mcast.ne1 Job # EN10202M
(239)272-3707 cell Fb EN1-6 Pg 14
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
WAMBACH -MELTON DOCK
1684 VINLAND WAY
NAPLES, FL 34108
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
APRIL 4, 2018
PREPARED BY:
TURRELL, HALL & AssoCIATEs, INC
3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B
NAPLES, FL 34104
WAMBACH - MELTON DOCK
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
APRQ, 4, 2018
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Wambach - Melton proposed docking facility is located at 1684 Vinland Way,
identified by Parcel Number 54490010546. The property is just south of the Golden Gate
Parkway, just east of the Gordon River Greenway property, bound to the east by a Bear's
Paw utility buildings, and bound to the south by the Gordon River. The property is
located in Section 35, Township 49 South, and Range 25 East. The upland portion of the
property is a single-family residence.
Turrell, Hall & Associates was contracted to provide environmental permitting services
and one aspect is the associated Submerged Resource Survey (SRS). This survey will
provide planning and review assistance to both owners and agency reviewers in regards
to proposed project. The proposed project consists of constructing a new docking facility
within the man-made waterway portion of the Gordon River.
The SRS survey was conducted on April 4, 2018. Light east winds, mostly clear skies,
and an incoming tide resulted in visible access to the entire project area. Surface water
conditions on this day were calm which also helped to provide fair environmental
conditions for the survey. The water temperature was 76°F. Low tide occurred at 9:26
A.M (1.0') and high tide occurred at 3:01 P.M (2.7') on the date of the survey.
2.0 OBJECTIVE
The objective of the Submerged Resource Survey was to identify and locate any existing
submerged resources within the limits of the proposed dock project or within 200 -feet of
the project area. The survey provided onsite environmental information to help
determine if the proposed project would impact any existing submerged resources and if
so would assist in reconfiguring the proposed dock in order to minimize any impacts. If
seagrasses are present within the project area it needs to be determined if the seagrass
beds are small in size or if they are part of a large seagrass bed. The general scope of
work performed at the site is summarized below.
Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel conducted a site visit and I snorkeled these
transects within the proposed project basin and verified the location of any
submerged resources.
• Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel identified submerged resources at the site,
estimated the % of coverage, and delineated the approximate limits of any
submerged resources observed.
• Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel delineated limits via a handheld GPS
(Garmin Model 76csx).
Page 1 of 4
WAMBACH - MELTON DOCK
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
APRIL 4, 2018
3.0 METHODOLOGY
Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS
to cover the entire property shoreline for the proposed dock installation and the
surrounding area expanding out 200 -feet from the project site. The components for this
survey included:
s Review of aerial photography of survey area
• Establish survey transects lines overlaid onto aerials
• Physically swim transects, GPS locate limits of submerged resources, and
determine approximate percent of coverage
• Document and photograph all findings
The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transects
spaced approximately 10 -feet apart within the proposed dock footprint as shown on the
attached exhibit. The survey was expanded out 200 -feet from the proposed docking
facility in order to verify no other resources were within the surrounding waterway. The
neighboring properties have existing docks which helped to provide easily identifiable
reference markers, such as dock piles which assisted in locating transects and keeping
them consistent throughout most of the survey area.
One biologist swam these transects using snorkel equipment within the surveyed area.
The other individual assisted with compiling notes and documenting findings on aerials.
Located submerged resources were photographed, the approximate percent of coverage
was quantified, and the location was delineated on an aerial photo as well as confirmed
via handheld GPS (Garmin Model 72H). The biologists used a half meter square
quadrant further broken into sections by cordage to make coverage estimates easier.
4.0 REsuLTs
The substrate found within the surveyed area included two distinct classifications; silt
sand with shell debris and just silt/muck material. These substrates were found scattered
throughout the entire surveyed area. There was also scattered shell and numerous rip -rap
rocks scattered along the property shoreline. The shoreline consisted of a rip -rap
shoreline which provides habitat for fish, crabs, and some barnacles, growing on and
around the rocks. The majority of the survey area exhibited a silt/muck bottom that was
devoid of any aquatic vegetation growth or any types of submerged resources. The lack
of any submerged resources is most likely due to the overall water quality within this
portion of the Gordon River as well as the water clarity not allowing much sunlight
penetration_ This was most evident in the deeper water depths.
Page 2 of 4
WAMBACH - MELTON DOCK
SUBMERGFD RESOURCE SURVEY
APRIL 4, 2018
Various filamentous algae and macro algae were observed and documented growing
along the bottom sediments throughout the survey area. Also observed were numerous
fish species during the survey and a list of these species has been prepared and is
provided below as Table 1.
Table 1 — Observed Fish Species
Common Name
Scientific Name
mangrove snapper
Lu Janus griseus
sheepshead
Archosargus probatocephalus
striped mullet
Mugil cephalus
snook
Centrompus undecimalis
jack crevalle
Caranx hippos
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
The submerged resource survey was completed for the entire subject property shoreline
and expanded out 200 -feet from the project area which yielded few findings. Scattered
barnacles were observed growing on the existing dock piles. The only resources
observed during the survey were fish species which included: Gray Snapper (Lu Janus
griseus), Sheepshead (Archosargus probatocephalus), Stripped Mullet (Mugil cephalus),
and a few Common Snooks (Centropomus undecimalis).
Negative impacts to submerged resources are not expected with the proposed docking
facility.
Page 3 of 4
WAM13ACH - MELTON DOCK
SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY
ApRiL 4, 2018
Muck/silt sediment along entire subject shoreline
Typical project shoreline
Page 4of4
HOA
LETTER
April 16, 2018
Collier County Government
Re: The Landings at Bears Paw — Lot 20, 1684 Vintand Way,
MarY (ABBY) Wambach & Gelnnon Melton residence- Boat Dock Extension Request
To Whom it may concern;
This letter is intended to notify Collier County that the Landings at Bears Paw Homeowners Association, Inc.
Directors has reviewed and approved the above refBoard of
erenced boat dock extension request (attached herewith).
apWep �4that our approval will allow the County to proceed with your review of the proposed boat dock extension permit
h
Should you have any questions, please contact me at 239-249-1953.
Sincere,,.
Kimberly
Director
Landings at Bear's Paw Homeowner's Association, Inc.
MARK STRAIN MEMO
Jeff Rogers
Frorm StminMark <MarkStrain@colliergov.net>
Sent Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:17 PM
To: Jeff Rogers
This is what r found in an email sent by Matt to the applicant:
The IAC definition of Mean high-water line (MHW) identifies the intersection of the tidal plane of mean high water with shore as
established by per the FL Coastal Mapping Act of 1974 laws of Florida. Within the state law wmean high water' Is the average height
of the high waters over a 19 year period, therefore, the County recognizes the original MHW condition as one of the parameters for
measuring the boat dodo setback. For this particular project, this Is the most restrictive measurement. As long as the docks do not
protrude 20 feet past that original controlling MHW line, then no BDE is required. The approved PPL pians show this dimension as
20 feet from the controlling MHW line and will suffice for the site review/approval. Please provide a copy of this email along with
the building permit application resubmittal.
MIRA/
239.252.4446
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. if you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send
electronic mad to this enlity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
K>>/ ZKhEdz'Ks ZED Ed
'ZKtd,DE' D Ed WZdD Ed
ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ
ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^ ^,K Z/s
EW> ^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ
;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϱϳϮϰ
ADDRESSING CHECKLIST
3OHDVHFRPSOHWHWKHIROORZLQJDQGHPDLOWR*0'B$GGUHVVLQJ#FROOLHUJRYQHWRUID[WRWKH2SHUDWLRQV'LYLVLRQ
DW RUVXEPLWLQSHUVRQWRWKH$GGUHVVLQJ6HFWLRQDWWKHDERYHDGGUHVV)RUPPXVWEHVLJQHGE\
$GGUHVVLQJSHUVRQQHOSULRUWRSUHDSSOLFDWLRQPHHWLQJplease allow 3 days for processing.
1RW DOO LWHPV ZLOO DSSO\ WR HYHU\ SURMHFW ,WHPV LQbold type DUH UHTXLUHGFOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE
PROVIDED.)RUPVROGHUWKDQPRQWKVZLOOUHTXLUHDGGLWLRQDOUHYLHZDQGDSSURYDOE\WKH$GGUHVVLQJ6HFWLRQ
PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type)
%/ %ODVWLQJ3HUPLW
%' %RDW'RFN([WHQVLRQ
&DUQLYDO&LUFXV3HUPLW
&8 &RQGLWLRQDO8VH
(;3 ([FDYDWLRQ3HUPLW
)3 )LQDO3ODW
//$ /RW/LQH$GMXVWPHQW
31& 3URMHFW1DPH&KDQJH
33/ 3ODQV 3ODW5HYLHZ
363 3UHOLPLQDU\6XEGLYLVLRQ3ODW
38'5H]RQH
5= 6WDQGDUG5H]RQH
6'3 6LWH'HYHORSPHQW3ODQ
6'3$ 6'3$PHQGPHQW
6'3, ,QVXEVWDQWLDO&KDQJHWR6'3
6,3 6LWH,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ
6,3, ,QVXEVWDQWLDO&KDQJHWR6,3
615 6WUHHW1DPH&KDQJH
61& 6WUHHW1DPH&KDQJH±8QSODWWHG
7'5 7UDQVIHURI'HYHORSPHQW5LJKWV
9$ 9DULDQFH
953 9HJHWDWLRQ5HPRYDO3HUPLW
956)3 9HJHWDWLRQ5HPRYDO 6LWH)LOO3HUPLW
27+(5
LEGAL DESCRIPTION RIVXEMHFWSURSHUW\RUSURSHUWLHV(copy of lengthy description may be attached)
FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s)RIDERYH(attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one)
675((7$''5(66RU$''5(66(6(as applicable, if already assigned)
352326('675((71$0(6(if applicable)
6,7('(9(/230(173/$1180%(5(for existing projects/sites only)
LOCATION MAP PXVWEHDWWDFKHGVKRZLQJH[DFWORFDWLRQRISURMHFWVLWHLQUHODWLRQWRQHDUHVWSXEOLFURDGULJKW
RIZD\
352326('352-(&71$0((if applicable)
6'3RU$5RU3/
6859(< FRS\QHHGHGRQO\IRUXQSODWWHGSURSHUWLHV
&855(17352-(&71$0((if applicable)
Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2
■
8 /50 /26; W1/2 OF N1/2 OF N1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SW1/4 LESS RW
00403240001
2801 COUNTY BARN RD
ISLAMIC CENTER OF NAPLES
K>>/ ZKhEdz'Ks ZED Ed
'ZKtd,DE' D Ed WZdD Ed
ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ
ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^ ^,K Z/s
EW> ^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ
;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϱϳϮϰ
3OHDVH5HWXUQ$SSURYHG&KHFNOLVW%\ (PDLO3HUVRQDOO\SLFNHGXS
ASSOLFDQW1DPH
6LJQDWXUHRQ$GGUHVVLQJ&KHFNOLVWGRHVQRWFRQVWLWXWH3URMHFWDQGRU6WUHHW1DPH
DSSURYDODQGLVVXEMHFWWRIXUWKHUUHYLHZE\WKH2SHUDWLRQV'LYLVLRQ
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
FROLR Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
Folio Number
)ROLR1XPEHU
)ROLR1XPEHU
Approved by: Date:
Updated by: Date:
IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED
)D[
(PDLO)D[ 3KRQH
3URMHFWRUGHYHORSPHQWQDPHVSURSRVHGIRURUDOUHDG\DSSHDULQJLQFRQGRPLQLXPGRFXPHQWV LIDSSOLFDWLRQ
LQGLFDWHZKHWKHUSURSRVHGRUH[LVWLQJ
Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2
00403240001
1/23/2018
■
JESSICA HARRELSON, DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC.
434.6060 JESSICA@DAVIDSONENGINEERING.COM
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
3/17/2017 Page 1 of 14
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR:
CONDITIONAL USE
LDC Section 10.08.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 – 2-90
Chapter 3 C.1 of the Administrative Code
PETITION NO (PL)
PROJECT NAME
DATE PROCESSED
A CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ZONING
APPEALS
A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION
Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________
Address: ____________________________City: _____________ State: ________ ZIP: _______
Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________Fax: ___________________
E-Mail Address: ___________________________________________________________
Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________
Firm: _________________________________________________________________________
Address: ____________________________City: _____________ State: ________ ZIP: _______
Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: __________________
E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________
BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF
ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS.
To be completed by staff
Islamic Center of Naples, Inc.
2795 Davis Blvd, Unit D Naples FL 34104
N/A N/A
nafees.usman@gmail.com
Josh Fruth and Richard Yovanovich, Esq.
DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC. & Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester
4365 Radio Rd, 201 / 4001 Tamiami Tr N, 300 NAPLES FL
34104 / 34103
239.434.6060/ 239.435.3535
josh@davidsonengineering.com; jessica@davidsonengineering.com; ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com
N/A
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
3/17/2017 Page 2 of 14
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION
Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary.
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in
common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the
percentage of such interest:
Name and Address % of Ownership
b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the
percentage of stock owned by each:
Name and Address % of Ownership
c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
percentage of interest:
Name and Address % of Ownership
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the
general and/or limited partners:
Name and Address % of Ownership
Islamic Center of Naples, Inc.100%
2795 Davis Blvd, Unit D
Naples, FL 34104
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
3/17/2017 Page 3 of 14
e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation,
Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the
officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners:
Name and Address % of Ownership
Date of Contract: ___________
f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or
officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust:
Name and Address
g. Date subject property acquired _______________
Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Date of option: _________________________
Date option terminates: __________________, or
Anticipated closing date: ________________
h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent
to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the
responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure
of interest form.
03/01/2018
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
3/17/2017 Page 4 of 14
ASSOCIATIONS
Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition.
Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County
Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774 .
Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______
Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______
Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______
Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______
Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______
PROPERTY INFORMATION
On separate page, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the
application:
x If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include
separate legal description for property involved in each district;
x The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months,
maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and
x The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise
concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required.
Property I.D. Number: ____________________________ Plat Book: _______ Page #: _______
Section/Township/Range: _______ /_______ /_______
Subdivision: __________________________________________Lot: ________ Block: ________
Metes & Bounds Description: _____________________________________________________
Size of Property: _____ft. X ______ ft. = _______ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _____________
Address/ General Location of Subject Property:
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
East Naples Civic Association
3823 Tamiami Trail E #274 Naples FL 34112
00403240001
85026
See attached survey and Attachment A for the legal description
varies varies 216,743 4.98
2801 County Barn Road
See Attachment "A" for the legal description.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
3/17/2017 Page 5 of 14
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
Zoning Land Use
N
S
E
W
If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal
description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on a separate
page)
Section/Township/Range: / /
Lot: Block: Subdivision: __________________________________________
Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________
Metes & Bounds Description: ________________________________________________
CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST DETAIL
Type of Conditional Use:
This application is requesting a conditional use as allowed, pursuant to LDC section 2.03.00, of the
_______________________ zoning district for _______________________ (type of use).
Present Use of the Property: __________________________________________
Cope Reserve RPUD Undeveloped Residential
Public Use/ Conditional Use Developed Storage/Repair Site for Collier County Vehicles
Estates Undeveloped Property
ROW/ Estates Developed Single-Family Residential
Estates Place of Worship/Institutional
Previous School (Resolution 84-084)
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
3/17/2017 Page 6 of 14
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Pursuant to LDC section 10.08.00 and Chapter 3 C.1 of the Administrative Code, staff’s recommendation
to the reviewing body shall be based upon a finding that the granting of the conditional use will not
adversely affect the public interest and that the specific requirements governing the individual conditional
use, if any, have been met. Further, satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning
the following matters, where applicable.
On a separate page, provide a narrative statement describing a request for a conditional use
and a detailed response to the criteria listed below. Specify how and why the request is
consistent with each of the criteria.
a.Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth
Management Plan. Include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section
or portions of the Future Land Use Element.
b.Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and proposed structure
thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
c.Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare,
economic impact, and odor.
d.Describe the site’s and the proposed use’s compatibility with adjacent properties and other
properties in the district.
e.Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request.
Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many
communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners
association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the
request is affected by existing deed restrictions.
Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been
held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official
interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year?
No Yes (If yes please provide copies.)
No.
See Attachment "B" for the Evaluation Criteria.
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
3/17/2017 Page 12 of 14
FEE REQUIREMENTS
All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners
Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 (to be credited towards the application fee if the application is filed
within 9 months of pre-application meeting)
Conditional Use Application Fee: $4,000.00
o When filed with Rezone Petition: $1,500.00
o Additional fee for 5th and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee
Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $300.00
Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting):
$2,500.00
Listed or Protected Species survey review fee (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00
Transportation Fee, if required:
o Methodology Review Fee: $500.00
o Minor Study Review Fee: $750.00
o Major Study Review Fee: $1,500.00
Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Hearing Examiner or CCPC: $1,125.00
Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the BZA, if required: $500.00
Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the
Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for
Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing.
As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is
included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result
in the delay of processing this petition.
All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners.
The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to:
Growth Management Department
ATTN: Business Center
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
____________________________________________ ____________
Agent/Owner Signature Date
____________________________________________
Applicant/Owner Name (please print)
FREDERICK E. HOOD, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
2/19/2018
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Fire Review Fee: $150
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
3/17/2017 Page 10 of 14
Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for:
A Conditional Use to be heard by the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals
A Minor Conditional Use to be heard by the Office of the Hearing Examiner
Chapter 3 C.1. of the Administrative Code
The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting, and at time of
application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet.
Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section.
Incomplete submittals will not be accepted.
Requirements for Review # Of
Copies Required Not
Required
Completed Application (download current form from County website) 16
Cover letter briefly explaining the project 16
Pre-Application Notes 1
Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2
Completed Addressing Checklist 1
Warranty Deed(s) 3
Boundary Survey 3
Conceptual Site Plan 24” X 36” plus (one 8 ½ X 11 copy)
Plans showing proposed location for utilities, if required
Plans for screening and buffering the use with reference as to type, dimensions,
and character, if required
Plans showing the proposed landscaping and provisions for trees protected by
County regulations, if required
Plans showing the proposed signs and lighting, including type, dimensions, and
character, if required
Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s), if applicable 4
Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project
boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 5
Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments & sketches) 1
Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 3
Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time
of public hearing.
Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 2
Traffic Impact Study (TIS) or waiver 7
Historical and Archeological Survey, or waiver 4
Electronic copy of all documents and plans
* Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be
submitted electronically in PDF format.
1
* If located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, include an additional set of each submittal
requirement
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
3/17/2017 Page 11 of 14
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS:
x Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials
electronically to the designated project manager.
x Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required.
]Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following additional reviewers:
Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment:
Executive Director Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or
EMS: Artie Bay
Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree
City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey
Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Immokalee Water/Sewer District:
Other: School District (Residential Components): Amy
Heartlock
Communication Towers:
Mosquito Control Collier County Airport Authority
Naples Airport Authority
Commercial Mining:
Impact Fees
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
3/17/2017 Page 7 of 14
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS
FOR CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________
Address: ______________________________City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______
Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: __________________
E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________
Address of Subject Property (If available): ___________________________________________
City: ________________ State: __________ ZIP: ___________
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Section/Township/Range: / /
Lot: Block: Subdivision: _______________________________________________
Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: _________________________________
Metes & Bounds Description: _____________________________________________________
TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED
Check applicable system:
a. County Utility System
b. City Utility System
c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: ____________________
d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): ___________________
e. Septic System
TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED
a. County Utility System
b. City Utility System
c. Franchised Utility System PROVIDE NAME_______________
d. Private System (Well)
Total Population to be served: ____________________________________________________
Peak and Average Daily Demands:
A. Water-Peak: _______ Average Daily: ________
B. Sewer-Peak: _______ Average Daily: ________
"TTVNFTUJNFTUIFBWHEBJMZ88
1FBLGBDUPSPGVTFEQFS.BTUFS1MBO
Islamic Center of Naples, Inc.
2795 Davis Blvd, Unit D Naples FL 34104
N/A
nafees.usman@gmail.com
2801 County Barn Road
Naples FL 34104
85026
00403240001
See attached survey
4,780sf worship center with 100 seats (max)
567 GPD
420 GPD
405 GPD 300 GPD
✔
✔
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358
3/17/2017 Page 8 of 14
If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the
date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________
Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of
sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of
affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil
involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer.
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of
Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to
dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the
Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in
accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also
include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will
be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If
applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility
easements for serving the water and sewer systems.
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided
for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from
any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity
to serve the project shall be provided.
Existing connection.
N/A; existing system
N/A; existing system.
Islamic Center of Naples Conditional Use – PL20180000204
Attachment “A” – Legal Description
February 2018 www.davidsonengineering.com
LLEGAL DESCRIPTION
ATTACHMENT “A”
THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4,
SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS AND EXCEPT 50 FEET ALONG WEST LINE FOR
RIGHT-OF-WAY, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBES AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 216,743 SQUARE FEET OR 4.98 ACRES OF LAND.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD.
Islamic Center of Naples Conditional Use - PL20180000204
Attachment “B” – Evaluation Criteria
April 2018
www.davidsonengineering.com
ϭ
NNARRATIVE & EVALUATION CRITERIA
ATTACHMENT “B”
The intent of this conditional use request is to allow a place of worship, within the Estates Zoning District.
The subject property consists of ±4.98 acres and is located at 2801 County Barn Road, on the east side of
County Barn Road.
Historically, two (2) previous Resolutions were approved on the property. Resolution 84-84, which
provided for a school use on the property and Resolution 95-532, under which a church use had been
allowed. However, both conditional uses have expired. The school that had most recently operated on
the property, Eden Autism Services, had been operating under the conditions of the original 84-84
resolution. However, the school ultimately closed and subsequently sold the property to Bellita Land
Holdings. The Islamic Center of Naples in turn purchased the property from the land holding company
with the intent of converting the property from a school to religious use.
Evaluation Criteria:
a.Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth
Management Plan. Include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section
or portions of the Future Land Use Element.
Response: The Estates Zoning District permits places of worship as a conditional use. The
application and proposed conceptual site plan identifies all the required elements for a conditional
use, as required by the LDC.
b.Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and proposed structure
thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow
and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
Response: The means of ingress and egress is limited to County Barn Road only. Per the submitted
TIS, the proposed Islamic Center will not negatively impact the level of service along County Barn.
Furthermore, the site is being limited to a maximum of 100 seats, which will generate less traffic to
the site in comparison with the existing private school use. Lastly, Fire Station #75 is approximately
1.9 miles from the site and Fire Station #20 is approximately 2.5 miles from the site.
c.Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare,
economic impact, and odor.
Response: The proposed Islamic Center will have a minimal effect on neighboring properties. Most
traffic/trips to the site are proposed during worship services, which take place on Friday afternoon
between the hours of 12:30p.m. and 2:30p.m. The TIS has been revised to calculate AM Peak Hour
Islamic Center of Naples Conditional Use - PL20180000204
Attachment “B” – Evaluation Criteria
April 2018
www.davidsonengineering.com
2
trips using LUC 560-Church, as requested. The fitted equation used represents AM peak hour of
adjacent street traffic per 1,000sf of G.F.A. Please refer to page 5 of the revised TIS.
The swimming pool, which was existing on site at time the when the property was purchased, will
be limited in its hours of operation from between 11:00am and 6:00pm. Existing landscape buffers,
containing mature trees, adjacent to existing land uses/zoning will reduce any potential noise or
glare for the entering/exiting vehicles. There are no proposed odors associated with the proposed
use. The site meets the criteria for the conditional use in the Estates zoning designation and provides
a transition between the proposed multi-family residential development to the north (Cope Reserve
RPUD) and the developed site to the south, used by Collier County for storage and repair of Collier
County Sheriff and Emergency Medical vehicles.
d.Describe the site’s and the proposed use’s compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties
in the district.
Response: The subject property is currently developed and has historically been used for a private
school. It is bordered to the north by the Cope Reserve RPUD, which is a planned multi-family
community, to the south by the existing Collier County Fleet Facility, and to the east by County Barn
Road and developed single-family residential across the right-of-way. The subject site directly abuts
undeveloped Estates zoned property to the west. The proposed Islamic Center will provide a
transition between the residential development to the north and the developed site to the south,
used by Collier County for storage and repair of Collier County Sheriff and Emergency Medical
vehicles. It is the applicant’s intention to continue a non-residential use on the developed property,
which will fit into the fabric of the neighborhood while meeting the design and development
standards of Collier County.
e.Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request.
Response: The subject property has recently been purchased by the applicant, and members of the
existing Islamic Center are all local to the region. Upon the successful completion of the conditional
use application, the proposed site will be found consistent and permitted per the requirements of
the LDC.
Future Land Use Element Provisions
Policy 5.4:
New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set
forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18,
2004, as amended).
The Estates District permits places of worship as a conditional use. The application and proposed
conceptual site plan identifies all the required elements for a conditional use, as required by the LDC.
Islamic Center of Naples Conditional Use - PL20180000204
Attachment “B” – Evaluation Criteria
April 2018
www.davidsonengineering.com
ϯ
Policy 7.1
The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting
collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection
spacing requirements of the Land Development Code.
Ingress and egress to the property are existing on County Barn Road.
Policy 7.2
The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion
on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals.
The site is an existing development, constructed with a parking lot and drive aisles. An internal access
loop roadway is not possible for this site. The Conceptual Site Plan design, however, allows for internal
circulation.
Policy 7.3
All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their
interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type.
The subject site is developed and new interconnections to adjoining parcels are not practical for the
existing and proposed types of adjoining development.
Policy 7.4
The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of
densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types.
Sidewalks/pathways installed along County Barn Road promote pedestrian safety and welfare. The
existing pathway on the western side of County Barn Road provides adequate pedestrian access for the
surrounding area and the subject site.
1IslamicCenterofNaples
Exhibit“R”ͲComparativeLevelofService(LOS)Analysis
Ɖƌŝů2018
EXHIBIT“R”
COMPARATIVELEVELOFSERVICE(LOS)ANALYSIS
Theexistingdevelopmentlocatedat2801CountyBarnRoadinSouthNaplesisa4.98Ͳacre
property.Theintentofthisconditionaluserequestistoallowtheapplicanttoentitleaplaceof
worshiporaprivateschool,asprovidedforintheconditionaluseprovisionswithintheEstates
ZoningDistrict.TherepealofResolutions84Ͳ84and95Ͳ532,providingforaprivateschooland
aplaceofworship,respectively.Additionally,thenewconditionalusewillallowfortheprivate
schooltoremainuntiltheworshipcenterusecommences.Forthiscomparativeanalysis,the
existingbuildingandallsiteimprovementsareproposedtoremainasis.Noimprovementsare
proposed.
Theapprovedlanduseconsistsofthefollowing:
Approved:
PrivateEducationalCenter4,780sfandassumed100studentsmaximum
Theproposedlanduseconsistsofthefollowing:
Proposed:
Worshipcenter(Mosque)4,780sfand100seatsmaximum
TheCapitalImprovementElementoftheGrowthManagementPlanestablishesLevelsofService
forthefollowing:
ArterialandCollectorRoads
SurfaceWaterManagementSystems
PotableWaterandSanitarySewerSystems
SolidWasteDisposalFacilities
ParksandRecreationFacilities
PublicSchoolFacilities
FireandEMSFacilities
Eachoftheareaswillbeexaminedfortheproposeddevelopmentsinthissummaryreport.
2IslamicCenterofNaples
Exhibit“R”ͲComparativeLevelofService(LOS)Analysis
Ɖƌŝů2018
ArterialandCollectorRoads
Basedontheroadwaynetworklinkanalysisresult,theproposedconditionaluseisfarless
intensivewhencomparedtotheapprovedconditionalusezoningconditions.Therefore,there
isadequateandsufficientroadwaycapacitytoaccommodatetheproposedusegeneratedtrips
withoutadverselyaffectingtheadjacentroadwaynetworklevelofservice.
Table1ͲProjectTripGeneration(NetNew)
DevelopmentAMPeakHourPMPeakHour
ProposedCU120
ApprovedCU10726
ProposedNetNewTraffic
NetIncrease/(NetDecrease)(106)(6)
ThechangeinuseoftheexistingdevelopmentwarrantsaleftͲturnlaneperCollierCountyROW
HandbookcriteriaforatwoͲlaneroadwayͲCountyBarnRoad.(PleaserefertotheTrafficImpact
StatementsubmittedwiththisCUapplicationforfurtherdetails.)Insummary,thereisexisting
stripinginplaceforaleftturnlaneattheCounty’sFleetManagementcenterjustsouthofthe
projectsite.Therefore,theprojectisproposingtoremovethegoringandextendtheturnͲlane
toservethesubjectpropertysiteaswell.Thisimprovementwillbereviewedforcode
consistencyandpermittedthroughaCountyrightͲofͲwayapplication.
SurfaceWaterManagementSystems
Inaccordancewithresolution#84Ͳ84,theexistingsitewastobedesignedtotheminimum
standardsfora25Ͳyear,1Ͳdaystormevent.Themostrecentsurveyperformedforthis
applicationrevealsinterconnecteddryretentionareaswhichcollectandstoresheetflowonsite
viaearthenbermspriortospillingoverandoutͲfallingintoCountyBarnRoadrightͲofͲway.Itis
DavidsonEngineering’sprofessionalopinionthatthisexistingstormwatersystemwas
constructedtomeettheminimumstandardsfora25Ͳyear,1Ͳdaystormevent.Theproposed
usewillmaintaintheexistingstormwatersystemdesign.Shouldfuturedevelopmentorder
permittingberequestedonsite,thenthesite’sstormwatermanagementsystemwillbe
redesignedandconstructedtomeetCollierCounty’sLDCsection6.05.01minimum
requirements.
PotableWaterandSanitarySewerSystems
TheproposedbuildingusewillbeservedbyCollierCountyPublicUtilities;thesameoperating
entityfortheexistingbuildinguse.Thisconditionaluseapplicationwillretainordecreasethe
intensityofthedevelopmentandtherebywillnotnegativelyimpacttheexistingimplemented
services.TheFloridaAdministrativeCode64EͲ6wasusedtoidentifylevelofserviceforeach
typeofuseinTables2and3.
3IslamicCenterofNaples
Exhibit“R”ͲComparativeLevelofService(LOS)Analysis
Ɖƌŝů2018
Theapprovedconditionaluse(school)isassumedtohaveamaximumof100studentsbasedon
buildingsquarefootageof80%“classroom”spaceat40sfperstudent.(4,780s*80%/40sf=96
students)Similarly,dayschoolworkersareaveragedatoneteacherpersevenstudents.
Theproposedconditionaluse(worshipcenter)hasdesignatedamaximumof100seats.
Table2–ApprovedConditionalUseSanitarySewerLevelofService
DescriptionUnitType#UnitsGPD/unitAverageDaily
Demand,GPD
PeakDaily
Demand,GPD*
Schoolper
student
DayͲtype100101,0001,350
Cafeteria1004400540
Dayschoolworkers1515225304
Total(GPD):1,6252,194
*Factorof1.35wasusedtodeterminePeakDailyDemandper2014MasterPlan.
Potablewaterdemandiscalculatedas1.4timestheamountofsanitarysewerdemand,per
CollierCounty’s2014MasterPlan.Therefore,theaveragedailydemandforpotablewateris
2,275GPDandthepeakdailydemandis3,072GPDfortheapprovedconditionaluse.
Table3–ProposedConditionalUseSanitarySewerLevelofService
DescriptionUnitType#UnitsGPD/unitAverageDaily
Demand,GPD
PeakDaily
Demand,GPD*
PlacesofWorship
(Church)perseatwhich
includeskitchenPerseat100(max)3300405
Total(GPD):300405
*Factorof1.35wasusedtodeterminePeakDailyDemandper2014MasterPlan.
Aspreviouslymentioned,thepotablewaterdemandiscalculatedas1.4timestheamountof
wastewaterdemand,perCollierCounty’s2014MasterPlan.Therefore,theaveragedaily
demandforpotablewateris420GPDandthepeakdailydemandis567GPDfortheproposed
conditionaluse.Thisconditionaluseapplicationwillretainordecreasetheintensityofthe
developmentandtherebywillnotnegativelyimpacttheexistingimplementedservices.
SolidWasteDisposalFacilities
SolidwasteisprovidedbyWasteManagement,aprivatecontractprovider.Commercial
accountsarechargedbytheserviceproviderdirectlywithratessetbytheBoardofCounty
Commissionersthroughcontractnegotiationwiththeprovider.Theproposedusewilldecrease
theintensityofthedevelopment,byeliminatingtheassumeddailycafeteriawaste,andthereby
willnotnegativelyimpacttheexistingimplementedservices.
4IslamicCenterofNaples
Exhibit“R”ͲComparativeLevelofService(LOS)Analysis
Ɖƌŝů2018
ParksandRecreationFacilities
NeithertheapprovednorproposedusewillcreateanegativeimpactonParksandRecreation
Facilities.Theusesdonotimpactparkfacilities.Thelevelofserviceisnotsignificantlyor
adverselyimpactedbyeitherthecurrentorproposedbuildinguses.
PublicSchoolFacilities
NeithertheapprovednorproposedusewillcreateanegativeimpactonPublicSchoolFacilities.
Theusesdonotimpactschoolattendance.Thelevelofserviceisnotsignificantlyoradversely
impactedbyeitherthecurrentorproposedbuildinguses.
FireandEMSFacilities
ThefacilityisservicedbytheexistingrightͲofͲwayhydrantnearthesouthwestcornerofthe
property.TheproposedchangeinusewillhavenomeasurableimpactonFireandEMS
Facilitiessincethereisnoadditioninbuildingsquarefootage.Therefore,thelevelofserviceis
notsignificantlyoradverselyimpactedbytheproposedconditions.
PROPOSED ZONING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ISLAMIC CENTER OF NAPLES
1. Service Hours:
- Services/ Prayers are held seven days a week and five times a day at the following times, limited
to 35 members for each service/ prayer time.
o Sunrise
o 1:00pm*
o 6:00pm*
o Sunset
o 9:45pm*
* These times are adjusted by one hour when daylight savings occur.
- Service / Prayer on Fridays, between the hours of 12:30-2:30, is limited to 100 members.
- Quran (Bible) Classes are held Sundays from 11:00am – 10:00pm, limited to 100 members.
2. The House of Worship is limited to a maximum of 100 seats.
3. The following accessory uses are prohibited:
-Daycare
- Food services i.e. Soup Kitchens, catering services open to the public or eating places
-Educational Services
4. The following accessory uses are permitted (in conjunction with the House of Worship):
Outdoor
- Multi-purpose / play area
-Gazebos
- Covered pavilions
Indoor
- Sheds (no more than 1,800 SF)
5. Leasing of the House of Worship facility to outside groups is prohibited.
6. Special events, operated by the House of Worship only, are limited to twelve (12) events per calendar
year and subject to a Temporary Use Permit as required, in accordance with the LDC.
7. Outdoor amplified music or sounds are prohibited.
8. Actual building height shall be limited to a maximum of 50-feet for roof type, appurtenances and
screening of roof mounted equipment.
9. Actual building height shall be limited to a maximum of 60-feet for a steeple.
10. Any steeple lighting shall be prohibited.
11. This conditional use shall be limited to a maximum of 24 AM peak hour (Friday) and 47 PM peak
hour (Friday) two-way trips, based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in
effect at the time of the application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval.
12. Dumpster enclosure shall be placed adjacent to the northern edge of the proposed preserve area.
13. For services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, as determined by Collier
County staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law
enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and at
location(s) as directed by Collier County Division Director, Transportation Engineering or his designee.
14365 Radio Road, Suite 201Naples, Florida 34104P: 239.434.6060 F: 239.434.6084Company Cert. of Authorization No. 00009496ISLAMIC CENTER OFNAPLES, INC.2795 DAVIS BLVD, UNIT DNAPLES, FL 34104ISLAMIC CENTER OF NAPLESCONDITIONAL USE1DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJECT NO.:F.E.H.F.E.H.F.E.H.18-0015SHEET NO:OFSHEET TITLE:PROJECT:DATE:REV.DESCRIPTIONREVISIONSCLIENT:PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCONCEPTUAL SITE PLANNCURRENT ZONING:E - ESTATES / CONDITIONAL USE ( CU RES.95-532 & 84-84 EXPIRED )PROPOSED ZONING: E - ESTATES / CONDITIONAL USE (CU)CURRENT LAND USE: VACANT EXPIRED CU FOR A PRIVATE SCHOOLFUTURE LAND USE: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICTPLANNING NOTES:PRESERVATION AREAPERIMETER BUFFERS± 0.20 AC.± 0.57 AC.± 1.34 AC.BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA± 0.12 AC.LAND USE SUMMARYACRES± 2.40%± 4.02%± 11.45%± 26.91%PAVEMENT/SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYSMISC. OPEN SPACE± 2.75 AC.TOTAL SITE AREA100%HOUSE OF WORSHIP± 55.22%1.96 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION HAVE BEEN LOCATED ON-SITE. PERLDC SECTION 3.05.07 B.1, 0.20 ACRES IS REQUIRED FOR A NATIVEPRESERVATION AREA (1.96 AC. x 10% = 0.20 AC).NATIVE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENT:± 4.98 AC.1ST SUBMITTAL02/19/2018REVISIONS PER REVIEW STAFF RAI COMMENTS 03/20/201804/10/2018REVISIONS PER REVIEW STAFF RAI COMMENTS 05/15/201806/11/2018
Civil Engineering • Planning • Permitting
4365 Radio Road · Suite 201 · Naples, FL 34104 · P: (239) 434.6060 · F: (239) 434-6084
www.davidsonengineering.com
1990 Main Street · Suite 750 · Sarasota, FL 34236 · P: (941) 309-5180
TrafficImpactStatement
IslamicCenterofNaples
(ConditionalUsePL20180000204)
PREPAREDFOR:
IslamicCenterofNaples,Inc.
2795DavisBlvd,UnitD
Naples,Florida34104
PREPAREDBY:
AndrewE.Rath,P.E.;No.73996
DavidsonEngineering,Inc.
4365RadioRoad,Suite201
Naples,Florida34104
February19,2018
Revised:April9,2018
Revised:May31,2018
MethodologyFee=$500
SmallScaleTIS=$0
TableofContents
IntroductionandMethodology.................................................................................................................................2
TripGeneration.........................................................................................................................................................4
TripDistributionandAssignment..............................................................................................................................5
SignificanceTest........................................................................................................................................................7
ConcurrencyAnalysis.................................................................................................................................................7
OperationalandTurnLaneAnalysis..........................................................................................................................8
LeftTurnLane........................................................................................................................................................8
RightTurnLane......................................................................................................................................................9
ProposedImprovements.........................................................................................................................................11
AppendixA:ProjectSitePlan
AppendixB:10thEditionI.T.E.TripGenerationManual,LandUseCodesͲ534,560,and562,
AppendixC:RightͲofͲWayRestripingExhibit
2IntroductionandMethodologyThistrafficanalysisispreparedtomeettheconditionaluseapplication(PL20180000204)requirements.IslamicCenterofNaplesisaproposeduseonanexistingdeveloped±4.98Ͳacrepropertylocatedat2801CountyBarnRoad,Naples.RefertoFigure1belowfortheprojectlocationandAppendixAforaproposedsiteplan.Thesiteiscurrentlydevelopedwithabuilding,associatedparking,andutilities.Thesite’scurrentlyapprovedconditionaluse(Resolution84Ͳ84)permitstheoperationofaprivateeducationcenter.TheIslamicCenterofNaplesprojectproposestoutilizethesiteasaworshipcenterwithoutincreasingbuildingsize(5,050sf),parking,etc.Furthermore,thechangeofuseintendstomaintainonetypicaldrivewayfromCountyBarnRoadwhichisatwoͲlanemajorcollectorroadway.Theprojectedoperationalyearis2018.PerdiscussionswiththeprojectapplicantandCollierCountyTransportationplanningstaff,thisprojectismostsimilartoaMosque(LUC562)duetotheuniquepeakhours.Accordingtothe10theditionITEmanual,peakhoursforaMosqueareonFridaysfrom6:00a.m.to7:00a.m.and12:15p.m.to1:15p.m.Thus,theprojectedpeakhourtrafficis,technically,offͲpeakhours.Thisdocumententailsa“SmallScaleStudy”trafficimpactstatement.TheanalysisisbasedontheavailableLandUsecategoriesprovidedinthe10thEditionoftheI.T.E.TripGenerationManualandprovidesahighestandbestusescenariowithrespecttotheproject’sproposedtripgeneration.Thisstudywillanalyzetripgeneration,trafficdistribution,concurrency,operational,andturnͲlanerequirementsattheaccesspoint.All10thEditionI.T.E.landusecodesutilizedinthisanalysisareprovidedinAppendixBfortheCountyreviewer’sreference.
3Figure1:ProjectLocationSITEN
4TripGenerationTripgenerationratesarepertheInstituteofTransportationEngineerspublication,TripGenerationManual,10thEditions.Thelandusecodemostassociatedwithboththeexistingandproposedusesareanalyzed.However,theITEManualfortheproposeduse(LUC562ͲMosque)doesnotofferAMPeakHourdata.AttherequestofCountyStaff,theAMPeakHourtripgenerationwillanalyzethefittedcurveequationsforLUC560ͲChurch.(NoteͲbuildingsquarefootageisusedasthecalculatingfactorfortheproposedAMpeakhour“Church”usetripssincethisoffersthegreatervaluethannumberofseats.)Forthepurposesofthisanalysis,anetnewcomparisonisprovidedinTable3whichrevealsanetreductionoftheanticipatedtripsgeneratedatthesite.Table1:ExistingAllowableUseSummaryofPeakHourTripsTimePeriod(ofAdjacentStreet)Factor(X)EquationTripsITE10thEditionExistingLUC534–PrivateSchool(KͲ8)AMPeakHour100studentsT=0.85(X)+22.17107PMPeakHourT=0.26*(X)26Table2:ProposedUseSummaryofPeakHourTripsTimePeriod(ofAdjacentStreet)Factor(X)EquationTripsITE10thEditionProposedLUC560ͲChurchAMPeakHour*5.05T=0.36(X)Ͳ0.741ITE10thEditionProposedLUC562ͲMosquePMPeakHourT=4.22*(X)21*AMPeakHourequationisperLUC560ͲChurchsinceLUC562ͲMosquedoesnotofferdata.Table3:NetNewSummaryofPeakHourTripsTimePeriod(ofAdjacentStreet)NetNewTripsAMPeakHourͲ106PMPeakHourͲ5
5TripDistributionandAssignmentThetrafficgeneratedbytheproposeddevelopmentisassignedtothenearestlocalroadwaysandconcurrencylink10.0(CountyBarnRoad)usingempiricalknowledgeofthesurroundingareaandthe2017CollierCountyAUIRdata.Additionally,perCollierCountyTISguidelines,significantlyimpactedroadwaysareidentifiedbasedontheproposedproject’shighestpeakhourtripgeneration(netexternaltrips)andconsistentwiththepeakhouroftheadjacentstreettraffic.PerCollierCountyAUIR,thepeakhourforadjacentroadwaynetworkisPMandthepeakdirectionissouth.Therefore,thetablebelow,andfigureonthefollowingpage,showsthedistributionsplitandtrafficasdescribedforconcurrencyanalysis.The10thEditionITEManualdoesnotprovidedirectionaldistributionforLUC562;therefore,a50/50splitisassumedforentering/exitingthesite.Table4:ProposedUsePMPeakHourDirectionalDistributionforConcurrencyTotalTrips**NorthofSite(60%)SouthofSite(40%)21PMPeakHourTripsEnter(50%)1174Exit(50%)1174**Roundingerrorsareincidentaltodirectionaldistributioncalculations.
6Figure2:ProposedUsePMPeakHourDirectionalDistributionforConcurrencyAnalysisSITEPMENTER:11PMEXIT:11N60%TRIPSPMENTER:7PMEXIT:740%TRIPSPMENTER:4PMEXIT:4
7SignificanceTest AsshownbelowinTable5theadjacentconcurrencylinkisnotfoundtobesignificantlyimpactedonCountyBarnRoadduringthePMPeakHourtraffic.Thetrafficgeneratedbytheproposeddevelopmentwillhaveamaximumofonlya0.78%PMPeakDirectional(southbound)impactonCountyBarnRoad.Assuch,additionalconcurrencysegmentsdonotrequireanalysisunderthe2%Ͳ2%Ͳ3%reviewcriteria.Table5:PMPeakHour,PeakDirectionSignificanceTestLinkFromToLanesExistingLOS2016ServiceVolumeNetworkPeakDirectionPMPeakHourSiteTrips%ImpactCountyBarnRdDavisBlvdRattlesnakeHammockRd2UB900SB70.78ConcurrencyAnalysisTheprojectedoperationalyearis2018.PertheCollierCountyTISguidelines,conditionaluseapplicationsaretoprovideaconcurrencyanalysisbasedonAUIRplusbackgroundgrowthto5Ͳyearhorizon.Therefore,Table6,below,calculatesthe2021backgroundvolumeforLink10.0whileTable7calculatesthe2021projectedvolumebasedontheannualgrowthrateofhistoricaldata.ThesetwovolumesarethencomparedinTable8todetermineif2021projectedtrafficiswithinLink10.0servicecapacityasidentifiedin2017AUIRdata.Table6:BackgroundTrafficVolume(BasedonCollierCounty2017AUIRData)LinkFromToPkHr,PkDirServiceVolumePKHr,PkDirVolume1/7TotalTripBank2021PKHr,PkDirBkgd.Vol.CountyBarnRdDavisBlvdRattlesnakeHammockRd90032052372Table7:ProjectedGrowthRate(BasedonCollierCounty2017HistoricalAUIRData)LinkFromToPeakHour,PeakDirectionVolumeActualGrowthRateMin.GrowthRate¹2021PkHr,PkDirGrowthVol.20122013201420152016CountyBarnRdDavisBlvdRattlesnakeHammockRd2852802903103201.482.00405
8Table8:PMPeakHour,PeakDirectionLOSLinkConcurrencyAnalysisLinkFromToPeakHour,PeakDirectionTrafficServiceCapacity*WithinCapacity?2021Bkgd.Vol.2021GrowthVol.ProjectTraffic2021Volume(Growth+Project)CountyBarnRdDavisBlvdRattlesnakeHammockRd3724057412900Yes*NocapacityimprovementsareshownintheCounty’s5ͲyearCIEforConcurrencylink10.0.BasedontheLevelofServicelinkanalysis,thisprojectdoesnotcreateanysignificantoradverseimpactstotheroadwaynetworkduringtheprojected2021PMpeakhour,peakdirectiontrafficvolume.Therefore,noadditionalconcurrencyanalysisisrequired.OperationalandTurnLaneAnalysisTurnlanerequirementsarebasedontheFridayPMpeakhourofthegenerator.The10thEditionITEManualdoesnotprovidedirectionaldistributionforLUC562;therefore,a50/50splitisassumedforentering/exitingthesite.RefertoTable9andFigure3fortheanticipatedturningmovementsatthesite’sentrance.Table9:ProposedUsePeakHourTripsforOperationalAnalysisTimePeriod(ofGenerator)Factor(X)EquationProjectTrips**TotalEnterExitITE10thEditionExistingLUC562ͲMosqueFridayAMPeakHour5.05T=9.54*(X)482424FridayPMPeakHourT=18.39*(X)934747**Roundingerrorsareincidentaltodirectionaldistributioncalculations.LeftTurnLaneAccordingtotheCollierCountyROWHandbook,SectionIII.A.1.a.(1)fortwolaneroadways“leftturnlanesmustbeprovidedwhenevertheleftturnvolumeis20vehiclesormore”.Basedontheanticipated28enteringtrips,aleftturnlaneiswarrantedatthesite’sentrance.
9RightTurnLaneAccordingtotheCollierCountyROWHandbook,SectionIII.A.1.a.(2)fortwolaneroadways“rightturnlanesmustbeprovidedwhenevertherightturnvolumeis40vehiclesormore”.Basedontheanticipated19enteringtrips,arightturnlaneisnotwarrantedatthesite’sentrance.
10Figure3:ProposedusePMPeakHourTripsforOperationalAnalysisSITEPMENTER:47PMEXIT:47N60%TRIPSPMENTER:28PMEXIT:2840%TRIPSPMENTER:19PMEXIT:19
11ProposedImprovementsThechangeinuseoftheexistingdevelopmentwarrantsaleftͲturnlaneperCollierCountyROWHandbookcriteriaforatwoͲlaneroadway.TheexistingroadwayadjacenttothepropertywaspreviouslyconstructedwithapotentialsouthboundleftͲturnlaneandpresentlyfeaturesstripedgoring.ThisCUapplicationprojectisproposingtoremovetheexistinggoringandrestripeasacontinuous380Ͳfoot(50’taperincluded)leftͲturnlanetoservetheproposedIslamicCenterofNaplesandcontinuetoservetheCollierCountyFleetManagementCentersouthoftheprojectproperty.ThisdesignwillmeetorexceedtheFDOTstandardindex301foraurbandesignspeedof45mphandwillbereviewedandpermittedthroughCollierCountyROWdepartment.PleaserefertoAppendixCfortheexistingandproposedrestripingexhibit.
AppendixAProjectSitePlan
14365 Radio Road, Suite 201Naples, Florida 34104P: 239.434.6060 F: 239.434.6084Company Cert. of Authorization No. 00009496ISLAMIC CENTER OFNAPLES, INC.2795 DAVIS BLVD, UNIT DNAPLES, FL 34104ISLAMIC CENTER OF NAPLESCONDITIONAL USE1DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PROJECT NO.:F.E.H.F.E.H.F.E.H.18-0015SHEET NO:OFSHEET TITLE:PROJECT:DATE:REV.DESCRIPTIONREVISIONSCLIENT:PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCONCEPTUAL SITE PLANNCURRENT ZONING:E - ESTATES / CONDITIONAL USE ( CU RES. 95-532 )PROPOSED ZONING: E - ESTATES / CONDITIONAL USE (CU)CURRENT LAND USE: DEVELOPED / PRIVATE SCHOOLFUTURE LAND USE: URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICTPLANNING NOTES:PRESERVATION AREAPERIMETER BUFFERS± 0.26 AC.± 0.57 AC.± 1.34 AC.BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA± 0.12 AC.LAND USE SUMMARYACRES± 2.40%± 5.22%± 11.45%± 26.91%PAVEMENT/SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYSMISC. OPEN SPACE± 2.69 AC.TOTAL SITE AREA100%HOUSE OF WORSHIP± 54.02%2.22 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION HAVE BEEN LOCATED ON-SITE. PERLDC SECTION 3.05.07 B.1, 0.22 ACRES IS REQUIRED FOR A NATIVEPRESERVATION AREA (2.22 AC. x 10% = 0.22 AC). THE 0.26 ACREFRESHWATER MARSH SHALL BE RETAINED ON-SITE TO MEET THISREQUIREMENT.NATIVE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENT:± 4.98 AC.
AppendixB10thEditionI.T.E.TripGenerationManualLandUseCodesͲ534,560,and562,
AppendixCRightͲofͲWayRestripingExhibit
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY
2801 County Barn Road Parcel
NAPLES, FLORIDA
APPROXIMATELY 4.98 ACRES
Prepared For:
Prepared By:
February 16, 2018
Updated: April 3, 2018
Collier County Engineering &
Natural Resources Department
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD)
Lower West Coast Service Center
2301 McGregor Boulevard
Fort Myers, FL 33901
Earth Tech Environmental, LLC
10600 Jolea Avenue
Bonita Springs, FL 34135
239.304.0030
www.eteflorida.com
Protected Species Survey
Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Ave, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 www.eteflorida.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 3
2.0 LOCATION ...................................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 SPECIES SURVEY MATERIALS & METHODS ................................................................................... 4
4.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................... 4
5.0 RESULTS......................................................................................................................................... 8
6.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 10
7.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................ 11
EXHIBITS
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Aerial with FLUCCS Mapping
Figure 3 FLUCCS Mapping
Figure 4 Transect Map & Field Results
Protected Species Survey
Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Ave, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 www.eteflorida.com
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to provide a search for listed species on the County Barn Road parcel
prior to re-development of the 4.98-acre property. The property contains existing development
and has limited native habitats remaining.
2.0 LOCATION
The County Barn Road parcel is located on the east side of County Barn Road, south of Davis
Boulevard and north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, in Section 8 Township 50 South, Range 26
East, in Collier County, Florida. The entire parcel is approximately 4.98 acres. See Figure 1 below
for a location map.
Figure 1. Site Location Map
Protected Species Survey
Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Ave, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 www.eteflorida.com
3.0 SPECIES SURVEY MATERIALS & METHODS
The species survey was conducted using a methodology similar to that discussed in the Florida Fish
& Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) publication “Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of
Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Populations Found on Lands Slated for Large-scale
Development in Florida.” This methodology is as follows: Existing vegetation communities or land-
uses on the subject site are delineated on a recent aerial photograph (Collier County 2017) using
the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS). FLUCCS mapping for this
property is detailed below in (Figures 2 & 3). The resulting FLUCCS codes are cross-referenced with
a list of protected plant and animal species. The lists were obtained from two agency publications:
“Florida’s Endangered Species, Threatened Species & Species of Special Concern-Official
Lists,” Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). Updated: May 2017.
“Notes on Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Plants,” Florida Department of Agriculture
and Consumer Services, 2010.
The result is a composite table that contains the names of the protected species which have the
highest probability of occurring in each particular FLUCCS community. See Table 1 of this report
for the species list that applies to this property.
In the field, each FLUCCS community is searched for listed species or signs of listed species. This is
accomplished using a series of transects throughout each vegetation community. If necessary,
transect integrity is maintained using a handheld GPS in track mode.
Signs or sightings of all listed and non-listed species are then recorded. Listed species’ locations are
typically flagged and marked by GPS.
Based on the habitat types found on this parcel of land, particular attention was paid to the
presence or absence of fox squirrels and wading birds.
4.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
Temperatures during the fieldwork for this survey were in the mid 80’s. Cloud cover was absent.
Approximately four (4) man-hours were logged on the property during this species survey. Table 3
details the date and time spent in the field.
The central portion of the property has been developed, containing a school, schoolyard,
swimming pool, and associated parking areas. The northern portion of the property consists of
undeveloped pine flatwoods. The southern portion is heavily vegetated, containing a high amount
of exotic species. There is a man-made depression area in the southeast portion of the property
containing a vegetated freshwater marsh.
The Subject Property has the following surrounding land uses:
West County Barn Road
North Undeveloped & vegetated
South Collier County Fleet Maintenance Facility
East Undeveloped & vegetated
Protected Species Survey
Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Ave, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 www.eteflorida.com
Listed below are the FLUCCS communities identified on the site. The following community
descriptions correspond to the mappings on the FLUCCS map below. See Florida Land Use, Cover
and Forms Classification System (Department of Transportation, Surveying & Mapping Geographic
Mapping Section, 1999) for definitions.
FLUCCS 171, Educational Facilities, 2.76 Acres
This thread of development spans the bulk of the central portio n of the property from west to east.
It consists of a school and schoolyard, swimming pool, and associated parking areas.
FLUCCS 411-E3 (50 to 75% Exotics), 0.96 Acres
This community is found along the northern portion of the property. The canopy vegetation is
dominated by earleaf acacia and a few scattered slash pine. The mid-story contains small cabbage
palm, myrsine, slash pine, Brazilian pepper, and scrawny melaleuca. Ground cover is largely open,
consisting of shrubby false buttonweed, Spanish needle, cocoplum, and myrsine recruitment.
Exotic coverage in this area is fairly heavy, containing Brazilian pepper, earleaf acacia, and
scattered melaleuca.
FLUCCS 624-E2, Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm (26-50% Exotics), 0.78 Acres
This community is found along the eastern and south-eastern property boundaries. It contains a
low canopy, consisting primarily of earleaf acacia. Mid-story level vegetation consists of pop ash,
woman’s tongue, Brazilian pepper, Java plum, cocoplum and myrsine. Ground cover is largely
open, consisting of scattered Spanish needle and cocoplum.
FLUCCS 624-E3, Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm (51 to 75% Exotics), 0.22 Acres
This community is found along the southwestern property boundary. It mimics the previous
description, but with a slightly heavier level of exotic vegetation, namely Brazilian pepper, Java
plum and earleaf acacia.
FLUCCS 742, Borrow Pit (0-25% Exotics), 0.26 Acres
This community consists of an isolated, manmade depression area located in the southeast portion
of the property. It contains standing water throughout, among cattails and Carolina willows.
Brazilian pepper is scattered along the upper edges of the marsh.
The following table is summary of FLUCCS communities and corresponding acreages:
CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE
171 Educational Facilities 2.76
411-E3 Pine Flatwoods (26-50% Exotics) 0.96
624-E2 Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm (26-50% Exotics) 0.78
624-E3 Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm (50-75% Exotics) 0.22
742 Borrow Pit 0.26
Site Total: 4.98
A FLUCCS map can be found below in Figures 2 & 3.
Protected Species Survey
Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Ave, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 www.eteflorida.com
Figure 2. Aerial with FLUCCS Mapping
Protected Species Survey
Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Ave, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 www.eteflorida.com
Figure 3. FLUCCS Mapping
The various protected species which may occur in the corresponding FLUCCS communities are
shown below in Table 1.
Table 1. Protected Species List According to FLUCCS Category
FLUCCS Potential Listed Species Scientific Name Designated Status
FWC or FDA FWS
171 None None - -
411 Beautiful Pawpaw Deeringothamnus rugelii var. pulchellus E E
Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia T -
Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais couperi T T
Fakahatchee Burmannia Burmannia flava E -
Florida Coontie Zamia integrifolia C -
Florida Panther Felis concolor coryi E E
Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus T -
Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis E E
Satinleaf Chrysophyllum oliviforme T -
Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus T -
Twisted Air Plant Tillandsia flexuosa T -
624 American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis SSC T(S/A)
Everglades Mink Mustela vison evergladensis T -
Protected Species Survey
Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Ave, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 www.eteflorida.com
Florida Panther Felis concolor coryi E E
Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea SSC -
Tricolored Heron Egretta tricolor SSC -
Wood Stork Mycteria americana E E
740 American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis SSC T(S/A)
Everglades Mink Mustela vison evergladensis T -
Florida Sandhill Crane Grus canadensis pratensis T -
Lilltle Blue Heron Egretta caerulea T -
Reddish Egret Egretta rufescens T -
Snail Kite Rorstrhamus sociabilis E E
Tricolored Heron Egretta tricolor T -
Wood Stork Mycteria americana T T
Abbreviations
Agencies: Status:
FWC = Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission E = Endangered
FDA = Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services T = Threatened
FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service T(S/A) = Threatened/Similarity of Appearance
SSC = Species of Special Concern
CE = Commercially Exploited
5.0 RESULTS
All animal species observed on the Subject Property are detailed in Table 2. Within Table 2, any
protected species observed are specifically noted.
Below are discussions of each listed species observed on the property:
Wild Pine (Tillandsia fasciculata)
Several common wild pine were observed in pine trees within the parcel. These may be relocated
offsite or elsewhere on the property prior to development of the parcel.
Table 3. Field Time Spent on the Subject Property
Date Start Time End Time No. Ecologists Man Hours Task
February 13, 2018 1:00 pm 3:00 pm 2 2.0 Species Survey Fieldwork
Total 4.0
See Figure 4 below for transect and field results.
Protected Species Survey
Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Ave, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 www.eteflorida.com
Figure 4. Transect Map & Field Results
Table 2. Birds, Mammals, Amphibians, Reptiles, & Plants Observed on the Subject Property
Common Name Scientific Name Observations Listed
Species? Status
Birds
Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura DV N -
Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura DV N -
Mammals
Eastern Gray Squirrel Sciurus carolinensis DV N -
Nine-Banded Armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus OH N -
Reptiles
Brown Anole Anolis sagrei DV N -
Scrub Lizard Iguanid family DV N -
Amphibians
None None - - -
Plants
Wild Pine* Tillandsia fasciulata DV - CE
* = protected species
Protected Species Survey
Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Ave, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 www.eteflorida.com
Abbreviations
Observations: Status:
DV = Direct Visual FE = Federally Endangered
HV = Heard Vocalization(s) FT = Federally Threatened
OT = Observed Tracks ST = State Threatened
OH = Observed Hole/Burrow T(S/A) = Threatened/Similarity of Appearance
MT = Marked Tree SSC = Species of Special Concern
C = Cavity CE = Commercially Exploited
DB = Day Bed
N = Nest
6.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
Ecologists from Earth Tech Environmental (ETE) conducted the protected species survey on February
13, 2018.
Several common wild pine were observed in pine trees within the parcel. No other listed species
were identified on the Subject Property.
Protected Species Survey
Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Ave, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 www.eteflorida.com
7.0 REFERENCES
Ashton, Ray E. and Patricia S. “The Natural History and Management for the Gopher Tortoise.”
Krieger Publishing Company. Malabar, Florida. 2008.
Collier County Property Appraiser. http://www.collierappraiser.com/
Cox, James; Inkley, Douglas; and Kautz, Randy. “Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of Gopher
Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Populations Found on Lands Slated for Large-Scale Development in
Florida.” Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 4. December 1987.
http://www.fwspubs.org/doi/suppl/10.3996/062015-JFWM-055/suppl_file/062015-jfwm-
055.s2.pdf?code=ufws-site
“Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Species”- Official List. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission. Updated May 2017.
http://myfwc.com/media/1515251/threatened-endangered-species.pdf
http://myfwc.com/imperiledspecies/
Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification (FLUCCS) Handbook. Florida Department of
Transportation. January 1999.
http://www.fdot.gov/geospatial/documentsandpubs/fluccmanual1999.pdf
http://www.fdot.gov/geospatial/doc_pubs.shtm
Species Profiles. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2017.
http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/profiles/
Weaver, Richard E. and Anderson, Patti J. “Notes on Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Plants.”
Bureau of Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology – Botany Section. Contribution No. 38, 5th
Edition. 2010.
http://freshfromflorida.s3.amazonaws.com/fl-endangered-plants.pdf
http://www.freshfromflorida.com/Divisions-Offices/Plant-Industry/Bureaus-and-Services/Bureau-of-
Entomology-Nematology-Plant-Pathology/Botany/Florida-s-Endangered-Plants
1712.76 Ac624-E20.78 Ac411-E30.96 Ac7420.26 Ac624-E30.22 AcCOUNTY BARN RD2801 County Barn RoadCollier County, FloridaFLUCCS MapXN/AAS SHOWNSHEET NO. DATE PROJECT NO. SCALEEARTH TECH ENVIRONMENTAL, LLCEARTH TECH ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC10600 JOLEA AVENUE10600 JOLEA AVENUEBONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135PHONE (239) 304-0030 FAX (239) 324-0054PHONE (239) 304-0030 FAX (239) 324-0054www.eteflorida.comwww.eteflorida.comO010020050FeetSubject PropertyFLUCCS Mapping171, Educational Facilities411-E3, Pine Flatwoods (26-50% Exotics)624-E2, Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm (26-50% Exotics)624-E3, Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm (50-75% Exotics)742, Borrow PitG:\ETEnv Documents\PROJECTS\COLLIER\2801 County Barn Road\GIS\FLUCCS Map v2.mxd / 11:00:02 AM04/03/18Note:2017 Aerial & Subject Property obtainedfrom Collier County Property Appraiser
Civil Engineering • Planning • Permitting www.davidsonengineering.com 2801 County Barn Rd. - 1980 Aerial
Civil Engineering • Planning • Permitting www.davidsonengineering.com 2801 County Barn Rd. - 2005 Aerial
Civil Engineering • Planning • Permitting www.davidsonengineering.com 2801 County Barn Rd. – Current Aerial
From:GMD_RecordsRoom
To:Jessica Harrelson
Subject:RE: CU-95-6 (Sunrise Academy)
Date:Tuesday, March 14, 2017 11:06:28 AM
Attachments:image003.png
That is correct. There is NO SDP for that site that was constructed in 1984. Not sure where you are getting your information from but I have attached a screen shot below from Property Appraiser. There was nothing permitted in 1995.
David Merino
Planning Technician
Collier County Government
Growth Management Department
Planning & Regulation
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104
Ph: (239) 252-2386
Fax: (239) 252-6265
From: Jessica Harrelson [mailto:Jessica@davidsonengineering.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:57 AM
To: GMD_RecordsRoom <GMD_RecordsRoom@colliergov.net>
Subject: RE: CU-95-6 (Sunrise Academy)
There is no SDP for that site at all? It’s an existing site, and I believe was constructed after 1995….
Jessica Harrelson
Senior Project Coordinator
jessica@davidsonengineering.com
www.davidsonengineering.com
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
4365 Radio Road, Suite 201
Naples, FL 34104
Phone 239.434.6060
Fax 239.434.6084
Disclaimer: This email, along with any files transmitted with it, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, retention, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or attachments is prohibited.
From: GMD_RecordsRoom [mailto:GMD_RecordsRoom@colliergov.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:53 AM
To: Jessica Harrelson <Jessica@davidsonengineering.com>
Subject: RE: CU-95-6 (Sunrise Academy)
I have ordered CU-95-006. It will take a few days but as soon as it comes in we will notify you.
As far as Sunrise Academy, there is no SDP.
David Merino
Planning Technician
Collier County Government
Growth Management Department
Planning & Regulation
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104
Ph: (239) 252-2386
Fax: (239) 252-6265
From: Jessica Harrelson [mailto:Jessica@davidsonengineering.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:19 AM
To: GMD_RecordsRoom <GMD_RecordsRoom@colliergov.net>
Subject: RE: CU-95-6 (Sunrise Academy)
I have the copy that the Clerk has, and it’s terrible. LOL. Please request the file from storage and we’ll see what we find….
Can you also pull the SDP For the Sunrise Academy (located at 2801 County Bard RD)?
Thank you!
Jessica Harrelson
Senior Project Coordinator
jessica@davidsonengineering.com
www.davidsonengineering.com
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
4365 Radio Road, Suite 201
Naples, FL 34104
Phone 239.434.6060
Fax 239.434.6084
Disclaimer: This email, along with any files transmitted with it, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, retention, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or attachments is prohibited.
From: GMD_RecordsRoom [mailto:GMD_RecordsRoom@colliergov.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:18 AM
To: Jessica Harrelson <Jessica@davidsonengineering.com>
Subject: RE: CU-95-6 (Sunrise Academy)
Hey Jessica,
We will have to do some research and request it from storage since it is not something we have on hand. Have you reached out to the Clerk’s Office? If they have it recorded then you should be able to access it online or at least have them email it to you.
Let me know if you would like us to request it from storage.
David Merino
Planning Technician
Collier County Government
Growth Management Department
Planning & Regulation
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104
Ph: (239) 252-2386
Fax: (239) 252-6265
From: Jessica Harrelson [mailto:Jessica@davidsonengineering.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 8:09 AM
To: GMD_RecordsRoom <GMD_RecordsRoom@colliergov.net>
Subject: CU-95-6 (Sunrise Academy)
Good morning,
I am looking for the Conceptual Site Plan that was included with the referenced Conditional Use. The copy that was recorded with the Clerk is eligible. (Recorded as Resolution 95-532)
Thanks!
Jessica Harrelson
Senior Project Coordinator
jessica@davidsonengineering.com
www.davidsonengineering.com
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
4365 Radio Road, Suite 201
Naples, FL 34104
Phone 239.434.6060
Fax 239.434.6084
Disclaimer: This email, along with any files transmitted with it, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, retention, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or attachments is prohibited.
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
Civil Engineering • Planning • Permitting
4365 Radio Road · Suite 201 · Naples, FL 34104 · P: (239) 434.6060 · F: (239) 434-6084
www.davidsonengineering.com
1990 Main Street · Suite 750 · Sarasota, FL 34236 · P: (941) 309-5180
M E M O R A N D U M
May 22, 2018
TO: James Sabo, Principal Planner
FROM: Oliver Sendall, Planner
RE: Islamic Center of Naples
CU - PL20180000204
NIM Meeting Minutes
A Neighborhood Information Meeting was held on Wednesday, May 16, 2018, at the Mayflower Congregational
United Church of Christ located at 2900 County Barn Rd., Naples, Florida, 34112. The following individuals,
associated with the review and presentation of the project, were present.
x Oliver Sendall, Davidson Engineering
x Frederick Hood, Davidson Engineering
x James Sabo, Collier County
Oliver Sendall started the meeting by making a presentation, reading the following:
x Introduction:
o Welcome and thank everyone for their attendance at the Neighborhood Information Meeting for
the Conditional Use application for the Islamic Center of Naples,
o Present tonight are, Oliver Sendall and Fred Hood, Planners with Davidson Engineering, those
preparing the application on behalf of the Islamic Center. James Sabo, Principal Planner with
Collier County; as well as representatives from the Islamic Center of Naples, the project applicant.
x Size and Location:
o The subject property is located between Davis Blvd. and Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. on County
Barn Rd., directly across from our current location (Mayflower Congregational Church).
o The site is located at 2801 County Barn Rd. and consists of 4.98 Acres
o To the south of the subject property is the County Sheriff fleet facility; to the west is Mayflower
Church of Christ and Estates zoned single-family residential to the north of Mayflower; to the
north of the subject property is the Cope Reserve PUD; and to the east is Estates zoning, which
had also been covered by previous conditional uses for the subject property.
x Previous Zoning Actions On Site:
o In 1984 the property was granted a provisional use as a school
o In 1995 that was updated to a conditional use allowing for a church
o Most recently the site was operated as a school under the original 1984 resolution
o Both of these have since expired, which is why the Islamic Center has filed for the proposed
conditional use.
o Estates base zoning allows for single family dwellings, family care facilities, essential services,
educational plants as permitted uses. Churches and houses of worship are permitted as
conditional uses, meaning they are allowed but require conditions of approval and public notice.
x Site Conditions
o Shown is the survey of the site showing the existing conditions. It shows the 4,780 sq. ft. main
building, the existing swimming pool and playground and swings. These represent the main
structures on the current site.
o Shown now is the proposed conceptual plan. While the existing pool remains, however the
application proposes limiting the hours of operation between 11am – 6pm.
o An 0.2-acre preserve has been identified on site. Where future plans for the site to include further
development, this preserve would be retained.
o Along the south property boundary there will be a 10 ft. Type A landscape buffer, to the north
and east the buffer will be a 15 ft. Type B, and along County Barn Rd. this will be a 15 ft. Type D
buffer.
o Conditions of approval for this application will be
o Limiting the hours of pool operation from 11am-6pm
o Limiting service hours to Fridays between 6am-6pm.
The service is currently 12:30pm-to 2:30 pm, however the
proposal provides the Center some flexibility
o Capacity will be limited to 100 seats.
o Special events (operated by the Islamic Center) will be limited to 12/year
o Outdoor amplified sound and music will be prohibited
o No leasing to outside groups or congregations.
o Daycare facilities are not being sought as part of this application
o Dumpster enclose will be located on the north side of the proposed
preserve.
The county asks that applications identify these locations to
avoid any concerns of noise for trash collection.
o Traffic control shall be provided during events of increased attendance.
x Questions
The following concerns were stated and questions were asked:
1. The church/mosque will be limited to 100 attendees?
Oliver: Yes, the county asks as part of these applications that the number of seats be identified.
2. Does this fall under tax exemption?
Fred: Any church may apply for tax exemption. Yes, that is the intent.
3. Where would I find a list of the conditional uses, and are those expandable?
Oliver: No, they would not be expandable once approved without having to go back in for an additional
conditional use application. Conditions will be read in as part of the approval at either the hearing examiner
or planning commission, whichever this ends up going to.
Fred: We can provide you with a copy of those in the presentation. They will be submitted with the
applications next round of review.
4. Will they be using the existing building and swimming pool? I thought they were building a mosque.
Oliver: They will be using the existing structure
Will there be any renovations to the building?
Oliver: Not at this time, no.
5. Why are you putting up a 15 ft. chain link fence along County Barn Rd.
Oliver: It is not a chain link fence, it is a landscape buffer. 15 ft. wide similar to any throughout the county
that you would see on a similar size right of way to County Barn Rd.
6. If it is being used as a house of worship, how often will it be used? For services.
Oliver: They would be having services on Friday. As with other church facilities they will be open for smaller,
less impactful meetings/prayers, but not for full services.
Not 5 times a day for daily prayer?
Oliver: There would be prayer meetings as you would have with any other church, but not full services.
7. Will there be a right-hand turn lane?
Fred: The number of seats and square footage of the site do not trigger a right turn lane. If they were to
apply for an expansion they would need to apply for another conditional use, at which point if there were
the need for a turn lane one would be added.
8. This looks like a preview for a mosque to me, why is this being camouflaged with a temporary plan?
Fred: It is not being camouflaged, they will be using the existing building. If they were to expand at some
point in the future they will need to come back for another conditional use if any of the proposed conditions
are not being met.
9. You said that this property was used as a church in the past. How long ago was that?
-Fred: 1984 was the original school usage, in 1995 it was updated to include a church. It was never
operated as a church, but the zoning was in place.
10. I’ve been looking at surveys for years. I’ve never seen an architect’s plans with no section, block, and lot.
Oliver: That is not a survey, it is a conceptual site plan.
Fred: That plan is based off of a survey, the conceptual plan like that is what is required of a conditional
use.
James Sabo: There are two levels of review at the county level. The master concept plan and the site
development plan. More specifics are identified at the site development plan level, we are at the land use
level. The county splits the master concept plan and site development plan in two specific processes.
11. Once they are in the building, I am concerned with them expanding the building height, is that a possibility?
Fred: A planned unit development could request for deviations in height, conditional uses are tied to the
estates district development standards. They would need to come back through the process if they wanted
to expand.
Discussion of advertising requirements.
Neighbor voiced support for project over alternatives.
Neighbor expresses concern over development on County Barn Rd. and growth of churches.
12. What is the next stage of review?
Oliver: Currently this is scheduled for the hearing examiner. Based on feedback it could go to CCPC and
then on to BCC.
Neighbor expresses that religious institutions are less impactful than alternatives. They are concerned with the
development in East Naples.
13. Has this property been purchased by the Islamic Center, or is it under contract?
Oliver: It has been purchased.
14. How many attendees are their currently and where do they meet?
Islamic Center Representative: 70-80 members, services on Fridays, on Davis Rd.
15. Is there any guarantee that they won’t tear the building down and build a 40 ft. building?
Fred: Base zoning height is 30 ft. Can’t exceed that without further zoning action requiring notice.
16. What happens next?
Fred: Staff report is issued, then to the hearing examiner or CCPC if deemed necessary.
Mayflower Church attendee and neighbor expresses support for the Islamic Center but also fears of development
on County Barn.
Discussion of concerns about East Naples development in general.
Explanation and discussion of conditional uses versus principle uses.
17. We would like to see a complete plan of the project with parking and more details.
Fred: There are no proposed changes to the site as this time. If any changes are proposed to the site in the
future, the applicant will have to come in for the site improvement or site development plan process, which
would require the more detailed plan and one that would bring the site to development code standards.
Further explanation and discussion of conditional use versus principle use.
18. Is it the Board of County Commissioners that votes on this?
Fred: It is in the hearing examiner process right now unless it gets pushed to CCPC, which would then go to
the BCC. This meeting is part of the public notification.
No further questions.
Contact information provided for Davidson and County planners.
End of memo.
4365 Radio Road · Suite 201 · Naples, FL 34104 · P: (239) 434.6060 · F: (239) 434-6084
1990 Main Street · Suite 750 · Sarasota, FL 34236 · P: (941) 309-5180
Civil Engineering • Planning • Permitting
www.davidsonengineering.com
April 19, 2018
Dear Property Owner,
Please be advised that the Islamic Center of Naples, Inc. has filed a formal application to Collier County,
seeking approval of a Conditional Use [PL20180000204], for a ±4.98-acre property, located at 2801 County
Barn Road, in Section 8, Township 50 South and Range 26 East. The intent of the Conditional Use application
is to allow a church/place of worship within the Estates (E) zoning district, pursuant to Section
2.03.01.B.1.c.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code.
In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, we are holding a Neighborhood Information
Meeting to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of the request. The meeting will begin at
5:30 p.m. on Wednesday, May 16th, 2018, and will be held at the Mayflower Congregational United Church
of Christ, located at 2900 Country Barn Road, Naples, Florida, 34112.
If you have any questions regarding the meeting or the proposed project, please feel free to contact one of
the individuals listed below.
Thank you.
Oliver Sendall, Planner Jessica Harrelson, Sr. Planning Technician
Davidson Engineering, Inc. Davidson Engineering, Inc.
Email: Oliver@davidsonengineering.com Email: Jessica@davidsonengineering.com
Phone: 239.434.6060, ext. 3005 Phone: 239.434.6060, ext. 3006
MAYFLOWER CONGREGATIONAL
UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST INC
2900 COUNTY BARN ROAD
NAPLES, FL 34112---0000
HIGHLAND PROP OF LEE & COLLIER
6980 SANDALWOOD LN
NAPLES, FL 34109---0514
BELLITA LAND HOLDINGS LLC
1851 PALM AVENUE
HIALEAH, FL 33010---0000
COLLIER CNTY
C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101
NAPLES, FL 34112---0000
BICKFORD, HARRY E & MARTHA R
120 MAR BET DR
LAKE PLACID, FL 33852---9442
MARY A ARMBRUSTER REV TRUST
PO BOX 11595
NAPLES, FL 34101---0000
WILLIAM L JONES QPR TRUST
3000 COUNTY BARN RD
NAPLES, FL 34112---5438
RAMA, LORETA & LUAN
5719 COPE LN
NAPLES, FL 34112---2729
DAVIS, DONNIE J
SHONNA KING DAVIS
5735 COPE LN
NAPLES, FL 34112---2729
GIFFORD, JOHNATHAN
2650 COUNTY BARN RD
NAPLES, FL 34112---5433
2801 COUNTY BARN ROAD W LLC
1141 S 7TH STREET
ST LOUIS, MO 63104---0000
SAVIGNANO, PATRICE E
2800 COUNTY BARN RD
NAPLES, FL 34112---5436
JESELLA, JAMES J
2828 COUNTY BARN RD
NAPLES, FL 34112---5436
EAST NAPLES CIVIC ASSOCIATION
3823 TAMIAMI TRL E #274
NAPLES, FL 34112
Published Daily
Naples, FL 34110
Affidavit of Publication
State of Florida
Counties of Collier and Lee
Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Natalie Zollar who on oath says that she
serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County,
Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in
said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Na-
ples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said
Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second
class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding
the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor
promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.
___________________________________________________________
Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.#_____________________________________________________________________________________
Islamic Center of Naples, Inc. 1992889 Islamic Center of Na
Pub Dates
April 27, 2018
_______________________________________
;^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞŽĨĂĸĂŶƚͿ
Sworn to and subscribed before me
This April 27, 2018
_______________________________________
;^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞŽĨĂĸĂŶƚͿ
4D ❚FRIDAY, APRIL 27, 2018 ❚NAPLES DAILY NEWS
ND-1956275
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
Please be advised that the Islamic Center of Naples, Inc. has filed a
formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of a Conditional
Use [PL20180000204], for a ±4.98-acre property, located at 2801
County Barn Road, in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida. The intent of the Conditional Use application
is to allow a church/place of worship within the Estates (E) zoning
district, pursuant to Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.1 of the Collier County Land
Development Code.
WE VALUE YOUR INPUT
The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting,
held by Davidson Engineering, Inc., representing the Islamic Center of
Naples, Inc. on Wednesday, May 16th, 2018. The meeting will begin
at 5:30 p.m., at the Mayflower Congregational United Church of Christ,
located at 2900 County Barn Road, Naples, Florida, 34112.
If you are unable to attend this meeting but have questions or
comments, they can be directed by mail, phone or e-mail to the
individuals listed below:
C. James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner
Collier County Growth Management
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Phone: 239.252.2708
Email: James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov
Frederick E. Hood, AICP, Senior Planner
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
4365 Radio Road, Suite 201
Naples, FL 34104
Phone: 239.434.6060
Email: Fred@davidsonengineering.com
April 27, 2018 ND-1992889
If you want to see Ozzy Osbourne and
Godsmack this weekend, they won’t be
playing Fort Myers. You’ll have to drive
to the Fort Lauderdale area, instead.
For the first time in six years, the an-
nual Fort Rock festival won’t be happen-
ing at JetBlue Park.
The move sparked an outcry when
Fort Rock organizer AEG Presents an-
nounced it last year. More than 1,300
comments piled up under Fort Rock’s
Facebook posts — mostly from unhappy
fans.
“Fort Rock was the one thing my fam-
ily looked forward to every year,” wrote
Ryan Russell of Lehigh Acres. “You are
destroying a wonderful thing that
brought an entire community together.”
Now, six months later, the trans-
planted Fort Rock finally takes place
Saturday and Sunday at Markham Park
in Sunrise. And some fans say they’ll
grudgingly make the drive — and they’re
even optimistic about the expanded
venue and its bigger lineup.
“I didn’t want it to move,” says Antho-
ny Fasciano, 41, of Cape Coral. “It started
in Fort Myers, and that was a lot closer
and I didn’t have to travel. So that kind
of sucks.”
Nevertheless, Fasciano plans to trav-
el to Sunrise with his 15-year-old daugh-
ter, Francesca Fasciano. It’ll be her first
metal festival.
And, besides, Fasciano says, it’s
about time he saw metal icon Ozzy Os-
bourne. Fort Rock’s 2018 lineup boasts
24 nationally known bands, including
Osbourne, Godsmack, Five Finger
Death Punch, Stone Sour, Shinedown,
Breaking Benjamin and Killswitch En-
gage.
“We’re very excited,” Fasciano says.
“It’s going to be one great band after an-
other.”
Other fans, however, plan to stay at
home instead.
“(I’m) definitely not going and very
disappointed that they moved it,” says
Erin Hazel of Lehigh Acres. “We chose to
spend our concert money on 98 Rock-
fest in Tampa last Friday and seeing the
Fans enjoyed the music at the 2017 Fort Rock.ANDREA MELENDEZ / THE NEWS-PRESS
Fort Rock happens this
weekend — in Sunrise
Charles Runnells
Fort Myers News-Press
USA TODAY NETWORK - FLORIDA
Continued on page 7D
COUNTY SHERIFF FLEET FACILITYCOPE RESERVE PUDESTATES ZONINGSF RESIDENTIALMAYFLOWER CHURCH OF CHRISTESTATES ZONING CONDITIONAL USE
PLAYGROUND & SWINGSEXIST. SWIMMING POOL4,780 SF EXIST. BLDG.
HOURS LIMITED TO11 AM – 6 PM0.2 ACREPRESERVE AREA10 FT TYPE ALANDSCAPE BUFFER
HOURS LIMITED TO11 AM – 6 PM0.2 ACREPRESERVE AREA15 FT TYPE BLANDSCAPE BUFFER
HOURS LIMITED TO11 AM – 6 PM0.2 ACREPRESERVE AREA15 FT TYPE DLANDSCAPE BUFFER
Posted August 1, 2018