Senior Advisory Committee Agenda 07/02/2018July 2, 2018 10:30 AM
Senior Advisory Committee Meeting
3299 Tamiami Trl E
Naples FL, 34112
Second Floor County Manager’s Front Conference Room
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Adoption of the Agenda
5. Public Comment
6. Adoption of Minutes from Previous Meeting
6.1. June 4, 2018
7. Staff Reports
8. New Business
8.1. Discussion with Assistant Chief Jorge Aguilera
8.1.1. EMS Issues
8.1.2. Identification of isolated seniors
8.1.3. EMS non-transport visits
8.2. Review of Executive Summary and Chairman Notes
9. Old Business
10. Announcements
11. Committee Member Discussion
12. Next Meeting Time, Date and Location
13. Adjournment
Revised 9/15/2015 version 15.1
DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the focus areas of the Senior Advisory Committee to the Board and
provide additional guidance for the remainder of the Committee’s preliminary term of one-year.
OBJECTIVE: To provide an update to the Board on the self-identified focus areas of the Senior Advisory
Committee to ensure that they align with the desires of the Board.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Board adopted resolution 2017-220 at the November 14, 2017 Board meeting
that established the Senior Advisory Committee of Collier County. In the following months individuals
applied for the new Committee. The Board appointed the initial membership at the February 27, 2018 filling
all vacancies except the position for District 3.
Since its initial April meeting, the Committee has convened 5 meetings where they considered information
about seniors from reports and the activities other communities are taking to support seniors. Through this
information the committee established the focus areas of the Committee. The Committee felt that
communication should be the primary focus area since all other categories rely on effective communication
with seniors. The following categories represent the current focus areas of the Committee.
• Senior Communication – County services available as well as how to access services, and necessary
information in the event of natural disaster
• Information Access and Resource Awareness – A review of the information flow between the
County government and the community to identify areas for possible improvement
• Senior Isolation and Aging in place – how to address the effects of Senior isolation to ensure that
seniors connected to their community
• Senior Mobility and Transportation – how to improve the mobility of seniors within the community
• Quality of Life Recognitions – what opportunities exist for Collier County to be recognized for the
Quality of Life its residents enjoy and what steps can be made to improve the Quality of Life
• Senior Center Development and Availability – how to improve access to senior centers and
determine the need for more
• Natural Disaster preparedness for Seniors – what can be done to mitigate the effects of a natural
disaster on the senior population in general and isolated seniors in particular.
The Committee will return to the Board at the conclusionend of the preliminary year with a report on its
findings and recommendations to the Board.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this executive summary.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There are no Growth Management Impacts associated with this
Executive Summary.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: Completed by the County Attorney’s Office
RECOMMENDATION: To approve the list of focus areas of the Senior Advisory Committee and provide
guidance for the Committee for the remainder of the preliminary term.
Prepared by: Include the preparer’s name, title and department
DRAFT
1 | Page
Presentation Charles D. Hartman, Chair of the Senior Advisory
Committee before BCC, July 10, 2018
Good morning, my name is Charles D Hartman. I am the Chair of the Senior
Advisory Committee created by this commission late last year. It is my pleasure to
make an interim report to the members of the Commission and to indicate the
direction the Senior Advisory Committee has chosen to take during its first year of
existence.
As you are aware the mission of the senior advisory committee is “to review
County plans and provide practical recommendations to the Board of County
Commissioners to be more inclusive of senior needs by the leveraging the
expertise and experience of seniors in the community”. The first four meetings of
the committee were dedicated to organizing and selecting the area of focus for
the committee during the initial year. We initially looked at five areas of possible
concern. They were:
1. Information access and resource awareness,
2. Food security and hunger reduction,
3. Affordable housing and homeless prevention,
4. Affordable and accessible health care, and
5. Transportation and public safety.
During our review, it became clear that food security, affordable housing, health
care and transportation issues were primarily the concern of other advisory
committees or of other elements in the private sector and that we could add little
to their work through our efforts.
However, the issue of information access and delivery of resource awareness was
determined to be an area that could benefit from additional attention. When we
say information access and resource awareness, we are talking about improving
the visibility, understanding, and access by seniors who need guidance or
assistance in order to identify locate or access needed services whether from the
DRAFT
2 | Page
private sector or government. it involves recommendations for development of
general communication strategies, the creation of educational materials and
information dissemination strategies.
In reaching a decision to focus on information dissemination by the government,
we reviewed several studies including the recent Collier County Needs
Assessment funded by the Community Foundation of Collier County and the
Schulze Family Foundation and the FGCU assessment of County needs created at
the request of the Naples Senior Center. In addition, we drew upon the
experience over the last 10 to 20 years of various members of the committee in
evaluating whether this was the area we wanted to focus on. Our experience in
participating in the Town Hall meetings organized by Commissioner Taylor and
Commissioner Fiala earlier this year added to our concerns. The citizens
participating in these and other Town Hall type meetings demonstrate a very low
level of understanding of what the government was proposing in the affordable
housing area and why. Additionally, we have found that too many of the citizens
in the County have questions about what government services are available and
more importantly how to find them. When viewed as a whole, the issue of
information access and resource awareness indicated that a gap exists between
the intentions of the County government and the understanding of the citizens on
those subjects.
I will return to the issue of public information in a moment but first let me
mention a few of the items that arose during our review of the studies and that
we feel will need eventual attention by the Commission on behalf of the senior
community.
For ease of review, I will note those items we believe should be brought to the
attention of the Commissioners broken down into the categories used in the
needs studies. We have restricted ourselves to issues that can be resolved in the
short term and that can be addressed without significant cost or organizational
change.
I must note that the following comments are made based on the assumption that
all agree on the basic principle that our community should be organized to allow
all our citizens to “Age in Place” and retain their independence for as long as
possible. We seek to treat all age groups, both the young and the old the same.
DRAFT
3 | Page
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Let us start with the issue of affordable housing for seniors. The recent analysis
done by ULI and the appointed stake-holders committees focused on the need for
workforce housing. It is clearly a growing crisis. But little was said about senior
housing needs which parallel those of the workforce and require basically the
same solution.
In addition to the need for more senior housing units there is the issue of
redesigning our new homes to better fit senior needs. There are new home
designs created by organizations such as the National Home Builders Association
and the AARP that detail changes to the interior construction of homes that make
them “age friendly” for residents throughout their life cycle. The life-cycle extends
from their first home purchase when they were younger and physically active to
the final period in their lives were many are limited in mobility and find it difficult
to live in a home with a conventional layout. Conventional in the sense that they
are often multi-level and have high cabinets and narrow doorways among other
things. This new recommended lay-outs has been defined as “Universal Design”.
We believe the Commission should consider requiring all new home developers to
offer a Universal Design option to all new home buyers. Making the modifications
involved in Universal Design are low cost when included before the unit is built
out but far more expensive if made to an existing structure. The National Home
Builders Association estimates that the cost of Universal Design modifications to a
new home before it is built-out would be less than $300.00 USD. We are
advocating requiring that new home developers offer a universal design option to
buyers and not mandating that anyone use it.
TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY
There are four issues of interest in the transportation and safety area that are short
term and low-cost fixes. If we are going to create an “Age-Friendly” “Livable”
community in which almost half the residents are seniors, we need to concern
ourselves with issues of senior mobility. In other words, we need to focus on
making our public and commercial spaces friendly to residents of all ages.
1. There are areas of the County that are in need of additional sidewalks and
more streetlights. Older seniors find it difficult enough to walk with a cane
or walker during daylight over smooth surfaces. It is all but impossible
DRAFT
4 | Page
when lighting is limited or the surface is unimproved. The lack of both in
some areas results in many seniors being effectively locked into their
homes after dusk. Taking advantages of our restaurants and theaters in the
evening or just going for a walk is out of the question. Maybe some of the
funds used to improve soccer fields can be used to address this more
important public safety need.
2. There is a clear need for more bus stop shelters and benches for the CAT
system. Seeing an older senior sitting on the curb in the sun at a bus stop
in mid-July is an absurdity in a county as wealthy as Collier. If money
cannot be found in the County Budget, we should explore allowing private
sector entities to pay for the shelters and benches and being acknowledged
by placing their name or ad on them. This can be done with dignity and
without crass or offensive signs we all seek to avoid. Your staff has
estimated that this can be done at a cost of only $35,000 per shelter.
3. We need to examine the feasibility of placing pedestrian islands halfway
across some of our large and high traffic roads particularly those that are
six lanes and more in width. Low mobility seniors are afraid to attempt to
cross in the time allocated before the light changes. We understand that
light timing is dictated by traffic flow concerns but it should also be dictated
by concerns for seniors with low mobility.
4. The issue of placing cement curbs at the end of parking spaces in our public
parking lots need to be reexamined. The list of complaints by residents,
both older and younger, who trip over them when walking between parked
cars is too large. A review of lots that do not include the curbs indicate no
increase in disarray or neatness. They may be more dangerous than
beneficial.
HEALTHCARE
The principal concern expressed by seniors in the health care area is the growing
shortage of primary care physicians who willing to accept Medicare and Medicaid
patients. Even if they can find a willing physician, they are faced with long delays
before they can be seen. This is a national problem and probably cannot be
solved locally. It reflects the turmoil that exists in the private sector and
government medical insurance programs. In any event, the solution to this
DRAFT
5 | Page
problem is beyond the scope of the Senior Advisory Committee. We can only
acknowledge that it exists and that for those affected, represents a serious
problem.
EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SERVICES
Education is an area outside of the scope of the Committee’s charter.
Collier County operates a small social services division. Its primary purpose is to
operate several state and federal programs in access to housing, transport
assistance and food distribution. The staff has advised the Committee that its
active client list currently around 200+ and that it has a waiting list of more than
700 qualified needy residents.
The staff indicated that they take a passive approach to identifying needy citizens
in that they wait for them to come to the county offices and sign up for services.
In a county with more than 125,000 senior citizens, serving 200 needy is
miniscule.
Moreover, the needs studies found that many needy citizens do not know what
services are available or how to find them. This is another area in which
information dissemination is wanting.
CITIZEN WELLBEING AND COMMUNITY COHESION
Most seniors are very satisfied with the level of community wellbeing and are
proud of the awards given to Naples by groups like Blue Zones and others.
However, there is a continuing concern about how we're handling new
construction and growth. We continue to build our new neighborhoods based on
the availability and use of the automobile. We are building sprawl of the worst
kind, The new neighborhoods are not walkable or bikeable. They are isolated
from the commercial services and social centers that seniors need and want. They
do not contain enough mixed housing. They are not friendly to older seniors,
working poor or beginning professionals. We need to look at how we plan our
new communities.
Since WW II, we have developed our road systems and our suburban housing
areas on the assumption that almost all citizens had access to an automobile. As
our average life expectancy has extended well into the 80s and is headed for the
DRAFT
6 | Page
90s, seniors are outliving their ability to drive safely. We need to rethink the
layout of our neighborhoods.
Numerous organizations have begun to address this problem and have come up
with plans to redesign neighborhoods and commercial centers to accommodate
the need of the growing and aging population. Among these are AARP with it
“Livability” programs and the National Association of Home Builders with its
“Universal Design Program”
We believe the Commissioners would benefit from a review of these programs.
There is one issue that probably should fall under this category and that is the
identification of isolated seniors prior to any emergency such as a hurricane. The
experience with IRMA indicates that there are numerous seniors living alone
areas that were not accounted for when most evacuated before Irma arrived.
Seniors that are isolated either due to physical location or loss of their social
support networks are a growing concern. There is no centralized lists identifying
them. Many separate groups such as churches, food distribution charities and
Government operated social services have partial lists but there is no central
clearing house or list that can be made available to police or EMS personnel
during an emergency.
The committee looked at several options and following discussions with EMS
personnel, it was determined that the use of the of the CERT teams would be the
ideal, low cost solution. Since these team will be given specific geographical areas
of responsibility and be responsible for reporting back through the EMS network
the level of damage and emergency needs in their zone, it would be a simple add
on to require them to identify those isolated seniors in their areas of
responsibility. This could be done as part of any routine exercise of the network
scheduled before an emergency occurs. Since these teams will be the first trained
responders with individual portable communication to enter their zones, they are
the ideal organization to assume responsibility for this requirement. This could
take a significant burden off the Emergency Centers who otherwise would spend
many hours responding to out County calls by relatives and friends checking up on
these seniors when they cannot contact them.
DRAFT
7 | Page
BACK TO INFORMATION ACCESS AND RESOURCE AWARENESS
Based upon our initial reviews, we believe there are two steps that can be taken
immediately that will improve citizen awareness of the services and resources
available. They are:
1. The creation of a joint government / private sector “Senior Web Page” that
will contain, among other things, information and/or links on the following:
a. the schedule of Government open meeting and the principal
subjects to be covered,
b. a listing of the main senior services available either from the
government or the private sector with information on how to find
them,
c. a listing of the major civic events and private sector meetings that
may interest seniors,
d. lists of community events of interest to seniors.
This web page can be paid for and operated by one of the non-profits
serving seniors.
2. The opening of discussions with the Naples Daily News to publish weekly or
by-monthly a” Senior Page” containing the information listed above.
SUMMARY
In sum, the Senior Advisory Committee is organized and on the move. We are
focusing in information resource primarily but are also reviewing the senior
components of the needs studies. If the commission thinks we should change our
direction or focus, we ask for your guidance.