Loading...
EPTAB Minutes 10/14/1991 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY TECHNICAL ADVISORY BOARD Minutes of ::fkit October 1991 Meeting Present: Addison, Beardsley, Davis, Land, Maehr, Means, Pires, Simpson, Wilkison Absent: Richardson (sick) , Saadeh 1. Meeting called to order at 4 : 08 P.M. by Chairman Simpson. 2 . Minutes of October 7, 1991 were not available for action. 3 . A general discussion ensued concerning the draft of the proposed County Habitat Protection Ordinance. Highlights from EPTAB members are as follows: A Should have flexibility in determining how much native vegetation should be retained; a fixed amount probably not equitable throughout the entire county. • Environmentally sensitive lands classified into the following categories: (a) Public lands, (b) Environmentally important, (c) At Risk Habitats, (d) All others. • Need buffers around wetlands and other preserved lands. Width of buffers undetermined. • A suggestion to vary the amount of retained vegetation by cost of homes: (a) < $50, 000 = 0, (b) $50 - 100, 000 = 10%, (c) $loo-200, 000 = 20%, (d) >$200, 000 = 30%. A Density bonus of 1 unit /acre for each 10% habitat retention above existing regulation. • In some habitats, before you can develop, have to obtain a certificate stating that habitat is not viable or have plans which show that the habitat is being protected. If not, then County enters into a mutually acceptable agreement with the applicant. If can't come up with a solution after a two year period, then development is allowed to proceed as originally submitted. A A need to tailor USFWS & FGFWFC guidelines to Collier County needs. • Set priorities on different habitats; minimum threshold size for regulation; exemptions = single family, bona fide agriculture?? A Mitigation allowable? When does it come into play? For all environments destroyed? For only those circumstances when develop some or all of the habitat slated for preservation? Should banking be allowed? Encouraged? Is bonding a wise action? • Does County have condemnation authority for environmental purposes? Can tie environmental purposes into public interest, health, safety and welfare purposes? A Should look at the County from a regional perspective. Different criteria apply in each region. A need to tie into and build on the EPTAB efforts of the past several months. A Don't re-invent the wheel - utilize other counties ' ordinances; don't set up another wetland regulatory layer; investigate adoption of other regulations by reference and the applicability of said adoption if the referenced regulation is amended. • Preamble of ordinance very important; need to have facts and data fleshed out in preamble. A Would be handy to have a sheet comparing other county ordinances, noting what has been working and what hasn't. Also a suggestion to furnish EPTAB with a copy of other counties' habitat protection ordinances. 4 . Mr. Means suggested that each member construct a bulleted list of desired criteria for inclusion into the Habitat Protection Ordinance and submit the lists to staff at the next meeting. Staff will take the suggestions and consider them in drafting another version of the ordinance. 5. Glen Simpson stated that henceforth he will formalize meetings. If an item is not on the agenda, and an EPTAB member wishes to add to the agenda, it will take a majority vote (minimum of six votes according to enabling ordinance) to place the item on the table. 6. Glen Simpson introduced an off the agenda item (item #1) for EPTAB consideration which concerned a letter from EPTAB to the BCC requesting information on meeting the timetable set out in the CCME of the GMP. The item was unanimously accepted by vote and the letter was discussed and modified. 7. Glen Simpson introduced item #2 , a letter that Gary Beardsley had written to the DCA concerning the County not meeting the deadlines set in the CCME. EPTAB members wished to read the letter before they voted to place it on the table. Mr. Simpson will poll the membership for the next meeting. 8. Mr. Beardsley handed out two items for EPTAB information. 9. Next meeting date established for 28 October 1991. 10.Meeting adjourned by Simpson at 6: 10 P.M.