Agenda 07/27/2010 Item #17CAgenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 1 of 266
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 13375, North Naples United Methodist Church Inc., represented by Tim
Hancock of Davidson Engineering, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman,
Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., is requesting rezoning from the Rural Agricultural zoning
district (A) to the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district to allow
development of a maximum 1,900 seat Church and Church Related Facilities, a maximum
1,900 seat Civic and Cultural Facilities, a maximum 200 student School and a maximum
209 unit Adult Assisted Living Facility to be known as The North Naples United Methodist
Church Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). The subject property, consisting
of 13.0 acres, is located on the east side of Goodlette -Frank Road (CR -851) approximately
±1,500 feet north of Pine Ridge Road, in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East,
Collier County, Florida.
OBJECTIVE:
To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review staff s findings and
recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission
(CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding this rezone
petition; and ensure the project is in hannony with all the applicable codes and regulations in
order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The North Naples United Methodist Church (NNUMC) Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development
(MPUD) Ordinance proposes a maximum 1,900 seat Church and Church Related Facilities, a
maximum 1,900 seat Civic and Cultural Facilities, a maximum 200 student School, and a
maximum 209 unit Adult Assisted Living Facility.
The assisted living units will include adult living facilities (ALF), continuing care retirement care
facilities (CCRF), and independent facilities for residents who are 55 years of age and older. The
floor area ratio of these assisted living units will be .60 and will not exceed 209 units. There will
be on -site dining for the residents. Group transportation services will be provided to the
residents for the purposes of activities such as shopping and medical office visits. There will be
an on -site manager /activities coordinator to plan on -site lectures, movies, music and other
entertainment at the on -site clubhouse as well as arrange trips off -site.
Commercial uses are allowed as accessory to other penuitted uses so long as restrictions and
limitations are imposed to insure the commercial use functions as an accessory, subordinate use.
These accessory uses are listed in PUD Exhibit A and include uses such as a Church operated
Thrift Store (not for profit only), a Columbarium, Individual and Family Social Services and
Vegetable Market. The PUD document restricts these accessory uses by limiting them to serving
principal uses on Tract A or principal uses on the abutting Church property directly adjacent to
Page I of 6
PUDZ- 2008-AR- 73375, North Naples
United Methodist Chump Inc.,
7 -12 -10
Agenda Item No, 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 2 of 266
and north of the subject property. Furthermore, these developments must be unified by a Site
Development Plan (SDP).
The subject site is currently undeveloped. Along the western edge of the site is a 100 -foot wide
Florida Power and Light (FPL) easement. Directly east of and adjacent to the FPL easement is a
20 -foot wide City of Naples easement. Along a portion of the northern edge of the site is a 35-
foot wide ingress /egress easement.
The buildings in Tract A will have a maximum of 4- stories and will have a maximum zoned
height of 50 feet and an actual height of 57 feet. A church steeple may have an actual height of
75 feet. The landscape buffer along the east and south property lines will be 10 feet wide, and
along the west property line adjacent to Goodlette Frank Road, the landscape buffer will be 20
feet wide. A deviation is being sought to provide no landscape buffer along the north property
line. However, if non- church related uses are developed on the subject property, landscape
buffers will be provided per the LDC.
The Master Concept Plan depicts limits of development (Tract A), a lake and a Preserve (Tract
B), easements, pedestrian interconnection, vehicle interconnections, and landscape buffer areas.
The Master Concept Plan also shows that 7.69± acres will be the limits of development (Tract
A), 1.34± acres will be a lake (Tract B). Another 1.19± acres along the southwest portion of the
property will be set aside as a preserve tract. The site will be accessed by a shared ingress /egress
point from Goodlette -Frank Road (CR -851).
Two deviations are being sought as part of this CPLJD rezoning petition regarding landscaping
and parking. Staff is supportive of these deviations. The detailed analysis may be found in the
Staff Report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The MPUD by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee
that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the
MPUD is approved, a portion of the land could be developed and the new development will
result in an impact on Collier County public facilities.
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as
needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order
to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development
order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation
Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County
Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include
building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees collected were not included in the
criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition.
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 13375, North Naples Page 2 46
United Methodist Church Inc.,
7 -12 -10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 3 of 266
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban
designated area (Urban — Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as identified
on the countywide Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). This
designation is intended for residential use and to accommodate a variety of non - residential uses,
including community facilities such as churches, group housing uses, cemeteries, and schools.
As previously stated, commercial uses are allowed as accessory to other permitted uses so long
as restrictions and limitations are imposed to insure the commercial use functions as an
accessory, subordinate use. Comprehensive Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has
found it consistent with the applicable policies of the FLUE. A detailed analysis of the project's
consistency with the FLUE is contained in the attached Staff Report.
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic
Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient
capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 year planning period. Therefore, the subject
project is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management
Plan (GMP) and no mitigation is required.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Staff is of the opinion that the
project as proposed is consistent with the policies in Objective 6.1 and 7.1 of the Conservation
and Coastal Management Element (CCME). A more detailed consistency review is contained in
the attached Staff Report.
Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed MPUD rezoning may be found consistent with
the FLUE and the other applicable elements of the GMP.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
The EAC heard this petition on May 5, 2010, and voted 5 -0 to approve this petition. There are
no stipulations.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION:
This item was heard by the CCPC at the June 17, 2010 hearing, and by a vote of 9 -0
recommended to forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a
recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions which have been incorporated
into the PUD document:
1. Exhibit A, Land Uses:
Item A.2: Restrict seating to 1900 and remove items a and b.
2. Exhibit A, Land Uses:
Item A.3: Restrict searing to 1900.
3. Exhibit A, Land Uses:
Item B.9: Limit vegetable stand sales to weekends only.
4. Exhibit A, Land Uses:
Item C.7: Remove the words "with pull cords designed ".
Page 3 of 6
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 13375, Nonh Naples
United Methodist Church Inc.,
7 -12 -10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 4 of 266
5. Exhibit B, Development Standards: Add a statement that any accessory land use to the
tract to the north is subject to principal use development standards.
6. Exhibit C Master Plan: Show the two deviations on the Master Plan.
7. Exhibit F Development Commitments: Change the words "Transportation administrator"
to "County Manager ".
Because the CCPC approval recommendation was unanimous and no letters of objection have
been received, this petition has been placed on the Summary Agenda.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Petitioner is requesting a rezone from the Rural Agriculture (A) Zoning District to a Mixed -Use
Planned Unit Development Zoning District. The attached staff report and reconnnendations of
the Planning Commission required are advisory only and are not binding on you. All testimony
given must be under oath. The Petitioner has the burden to prove that the proposed rezone is
consistent with all the criteria set forth below, and you may question Petitioner, or staff, to
satisfy yourself that the necessary criteria have been satisfied. Should you consider denying the
rezone, to assure that your decision is not later found to be arbitrary, discriminatory or
unreasonable, the denial must be based upon competent, substantial evidence that the proposal
does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below.
Criteria for Straight Rezones
Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies
and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan?
2. Will the proposed rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern?
3. Would the proposed rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district
unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts?
4. Are the existing district boundaries illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change?
5. Do changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment
necessary?
6. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood'?
7. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because
of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during
construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety'?
S. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem?
Page 4 of 6
PUDLL2008 -AR- 13375, North Naples
United Methodist Chinch Inc.,
7- 1_^ -10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27. 2010
Page 5 of 266
9. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas?
10. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area?
11. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations?
12. Will the proposed change constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasted with the public welfare?
13. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with
existing zoning?
14. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
County?
15. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for
the proposed use in districts already pennitting such use.
16. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site
alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the
range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification.
17. What is the impact of development on the availability of adequate public fiacilities
and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County
Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier
County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.111, as amended?
18. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to this rezone request that
the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the
public health, safety, and welfare?
The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorneys Office and is legally sufficient
for Board action. -STW
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for PUDZ -2008-
AR- 13375, The North Naples United Methodist Church Mixed -use Planned Unit Development
(MPUD) subject to staffs and the CCPC conditions of approval, which have been incorporated
into the attached PUD document.
Page 5 of 6
PUDZ - 2008 -AR- 13375, North Naples
United Methodist Church Inc.,
7 -12 -10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 6 of 266
PREPARED BY:
Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner, Land Development Services
Growth Management Division, Planning and Regulation
Attachments: 1) Staff Report
2) Ordinance
3) Application
Page 6 of 6
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 13375, North Maples
United Methodist Church Inc.,
7- 11 -I11
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 7 of 266
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number: 17C
Item Summary: This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. PUDZ- 2008 -AR -13375 North Naples United Methodist Church Inc.,
represented by Tim Hancock of Davidson Engineering, Inc., and Richard D. Yovanovich,
Esq. of Goodlette, Coleman, Johnson, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., is requesting rezoning
from the Rural Agricultural zoning district (A) to the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development
(MPUD) zoning district to allow development of a maximum 1,900 seat Church and Church
Related Facilities, a maximum 1,900 seat Civic and Cultural Facilities, a maximum 200
student School and a maximum 209 unit Adult Assisted Living Facility to be known as The
North Naples United Methodist Church Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). The
subject property, consisting of 13.0 acres, is located on the east side of Goodlette -Frank
Road (CR -951) approximately 15 00 feet north of Pine Ridge Road, in Section 10, Township
49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (CTS)
Meeting Date: 7127/2010 9:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Nancy Gundlach
Planner, Principal
Date
Community Development 8
Zoning 8 Land Development Review
612912010 9:47:39 AM
Environmental Services
Approved By
Norm E. Feder, AICP
Administrator- Transportation
Date
Transportation Division
Transportation Administration
7/212010 9:01 AM
Approved By
Nick Casalanguida
Director - Transportation Planning
Date
Transportation Division
Transportation Planning
712!2010 3:46 PM
Approved By
Ray Bellows
Manager- Planning
Date
Community Development 8
Zoning &Land Development Review
71212010 4:24 PM
Environmental Services
Approved By
William D. Lorenz, Jr., P.E.
Director- CDES Engineering Services
Date
Community Development 8
Engineering 8 Environmental S-ervices
7/312010 9:52 AM
Environmental Services
Approved By
Steven Williams
Assistant County Attorney
Date
County Attorney
County Attorney
7!612010 7:46 AM
Approved By
Judy Puig
Operations Analyst
Da *_e
Agenda Item No, 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 8 of 266
Community Development &
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Environmental Services
7/6'20101:35 PM
Approved By
Heidi F. Ashton
Section Chief /Land Use - Transportation
Date
County Attorney
County Attorney
7/8/2010 11:40 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
7/8/2010 3:01 PM
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attorney
Date
7!912010 1:33 PM
Approved By
Mark lsackson
Management /Budget Analyst, Senior
Date
Office of Management &
Budget
Office of Management & Budget
7/12/2010 2:29 PM
Agenda Item No. 17C
AGENDA IUEN 97B2010
Page 9 of 266
Co i r County
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
HEARING DATE: JUNE 17, 2010
SUBJECT: PUDZ- 2008 -AP.- 13375, NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
CHURCH MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Owner: The North Naples United Methodist Church Inc.
6000 Goodlette -Frank Road
- Naples, FL 34109
Agent(s): Mr. Tim Hancock, AICP
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301
Naples, FL 34105
REQUESTED ACTION:
Mr. Richard D. Yovanovich. Esquire
Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A.
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, FL 34103
The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a rezone of the
subject 13.0± acre site from the Rural Agricultural zoning district (A) to the Mixed -Use Planned Unit
Development (MPUD) zoning district for the North Naples United Methodist Church Mixed -Use
Planned Unit Development (MPUD).
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject PUD is located on the east side of Goodlette -Frank Road (CR -951) approximately ±1500
feet north of Pine Ridge Road, in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County,
Florida. (See location map on following page.)
Page 1 of 16
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 13375, NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 6/7/10
�\ r
g ♦I
N V
Q s \
1 /
1 r
° 1 r
I
I I
o
2_
� s
� n
Z a
i
1
I I
r
W U
a
r�
O $
aJ
+
y
g
z
y
\
t y,
v
�\ r
g ♦I
N V
Q s \
1 /
1 r
° 1 r
I
I I
o
2_
� s
� n
Z a
i
1
Z
Z'
O
N
cQ
G
Z
O
Q
U
O
n'
�i
m
of
N
G�
Y<
Z
O
III
W'
G.
a
+
y
z
y
x
t y,
v
a
Z
Z'
O
N
cQ
G
Z
O
Q
U
O
n'
�i
m
of
N
G�
Y<
Z
O
III
W'
G.
+
y
z
y
Z
Z'
O
N
cQ
G
Z
O
Q
U
O
n'
�i
m
of
N
G�
Y<
Z
O
III
W'
G.
N � 9
I
`I2 1
F
W � .
p n:i LY
w i L 5
9 I�
ILL
g g r 9 hgg
�d
Y N
w N?
rF� r� Y TI =1 U dls P> `.s;�riZ Izl'
X31 d�� 5 f � < t
�
Z
O a �I'� %�� •'_ O
I �O
JA I WN=
t Z9
I j A Zwi
¢ 1.- U5
I63sn 031b13d R
II HOdnHOi wN un tism 3sn aNVI 'Z
3L3100003d Ob DOE 'ONIN02 H 0 96
—
.. _ W
O a
r
�I
i
G'
III> a<
a
,�2 1 ..
Fe
,.
O i w u
'I
Z
vovoia a msaee sx_ � �
$ w U ��
LLI
1N34V3 �`: NtlW d3.lblA ❑NV Y
1V1063WW O C3AaddN.]Sn aNVI
Z
I ❑qd SYJOWW003JOIL 3NId � &NING2 I
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27. 2010
Page 12 of 266
PURPOSE/DESCRIP'TION OF PROJECT
The North Naples United Methodist Church (NNUMC) Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development
(MPUD) Ordinance proposes a maximum a 1,900 seat Church and Church Related Facilities, a
maximum 3,100 seat Civic and Cultural Facilities, a maximum 200 student School, and a maximum
209 unit Adult Assisted Living Facility.
The assisted living units will include adult living facilities (ALF), continuing care retirement care
facilities (CCRF), and independent facilities for residents who are 55 years of age and older. The floor
area ratio of these assisted living units will be .60 and will not exceed 209 units. There will be on -site
dining for the residents. Group transportation services will he provided to the residents for the
purposes of activities such as shopping and medical office visits. There will be an on -site
manager /activities coordinator to plan on -site Lectures, movies. music and other entertainment at the
on -site clubhouse as well as arrange trips off -site.
Commercial uses are allowed as accessory to other permitted uses so long as restrictions and
limitations are imposed to insure the commercial use functions as an accessory, subordinate use.
These accessory uses are listed in PUD Exhibit A and include uses such as a Church operated Thrift
Store (not for profit only), a Columharium, (ndn idUal and Family Social Services and Vegetable
Market. The PUD document restricts these accessory uses by lirmting them to serving principal uses
on Tract A or principal uses on the abutting Church property directly adjacent to and north of the
subject property. Furthermore, these developments must be unified by a Site Development Plan
(SDP).
The subject site is currently undeveloped. Along the western edge of the site is a 100 -foot wide
Florida Power and Light (FPL) easement. Directly east of and adjacent to the FPL easement is a 20-
foot wide City of Naples easement. Along a portion of the northern edge of the site is a 35 -foot wide
ingress /egress easement.
The buildings in Tract A will have a maximum of 4- stories and will have a maximum zoned heieht of
50 feet and an actual hei«ht of 57 feet. A church steeple may have an actual heieht of 75 feet. The
landscape buffer along the east and south property lines will be 10 feet wide, and along the west
property line adjacent to Goodlette Frank Road, the landscape buffer will be 20 feet wide. A deviation
is being sought to provide no landscape huffer along the north property line. However. if non- church
related uses are deg eloped on the suhicct grope rtv. landscape buffers will be provided per the LDC.
The Master Concept Plan depicts limits of development (Tract A). a lake and a Preserve ('Tract B),
easements. pedestrian interconnection, vehicle interconnections, and landscape buffer areas. The
Master Concept Plan also shows that 7.69± acres will he the limits of development (Tract A), 1.34±
acres will be a lake (Tract B). Another I.19s acres along the southwest portion of the property will be
set aside as a preserve tract. The site will he accessed by a shared ingress /egress point from
Goodlette -Frank Road (CR -851).
Two deviations are being sought as part of this CPUD rezoning petition
Page 4 of 16
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 13375, NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 6,7;10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 13 of 266
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: developed with the North Naples United Methodist Church, a 300± acre residential
development, approved for a maximum of 900 residential dwelling units and churches with a
zoning designation of 300 Acre Goodlette Road PUD (Planned Unit Development)
East: developed with the Pine Ridge Middle School, with a zoning designation of Agriculture (A)
South: developed with retail and commercial uses, a 31±acre commercial development approved for a
maximum of 275,000 square feet of retail and commercial uses, with a zoning designation of
Pine Ridge Commons PUD
West: Goodlette -Frank Road (CR 851), then single family homes, with a zoning designation of
Agriculture (A)
AERIAL PHOTO
Page 5 of 16
PUDZ - 2008 -AR- 13375, NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 617/10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 14 of 266
GROWTH -MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMPI CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban designated
area (Urban — Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as identified on the
countywide Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). This designation is
intended for residential use and to accommodate a variety of non - residential uses, including
community facilities such as churches, group housing uses, cemeteries, and schools.
As previously stated, commercial uses are allowed as accessory to other permitted uses so long as
restrictions and limitations are imposed to insure the commercial use functions as an accessory,
subordinate use.
FLUE Objective 7 and relevant policies are stated below; each policy is followed by staff analysis.
Objective 7: in an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places:
The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida promote smart ,rowth policies, and
adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall he
implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable.
Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to
fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating
intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code.
(The Master Concept Plan depicts direct access to Goodlette -Frank Road, an arterial road as
identified in the Transportation Element.)
Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce
vehicle connection on nearhy collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals.
(The proposed CPUD Master Concept Plan depicts a .single access point onto Goodlette Frank Road
and access from the existing drive on the adjacent church property. By default, internal access
and/or loop road will have to be provided to serve individual lots created. However, due to the small
size of the project, a loop road likely is not feasible. As a result, Staff is of the opinion that this
policy is not applicable.)
Policy 7.3: All new and existinlo developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and
their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land
use type.
(The proposed CPUD exhibits and Master Concept Plan of the CPUD depicts cross access to
adjoining property to the tVorth. Interconnection to the east to the Middle School is not feasible as
athletic fields are located along the propert)� line. Interconnection to the south to flee existing retail
and office buildings (Pine Ridge Commons PUD) is not feasible without interfering with the
required preserve, storm water lake and parking, lit addition, the agent for the applicant asserts
that is not desired nor supported by the adjacent property owner or the Collier County Public
Schools. As a result, Staff is of the opinion that this polic), is applicable to the interconnection to
the north on1r.)
Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new, developments to provide walkable communities with a
blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types.
Page 6 of 16
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 13375, NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 6/7/10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27. 2010
Page 15 of 266
(Mostly not applicable. Open spaces are provided in excess of that required by the Land
Development Code (LDC). Sidewalks must be provided as required by the LDC as no deviations are
requested.)
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact
Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to
accommodate this project within the 5 year planning period. Therefore, the subject project is
consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and
no mitigation is required.
Goodlette Frank Road Impacts: The first concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 24,
Goodlette -Frank Road (CR -851), between Vanderbilt Beach Road and Pine Ridge Road (CR -896).
The project generates 17 new p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips, which represents a 0.61 percent
impact. This segment of Goodlette Frank Road (CR -851) currently has a remaining capacity of 1293
trips, and is currently at LOS "B" (Level of Service °C ") as reflected by the 2009 AUIR (Annual
Urban Inventory Report).
No subsequent links beyond this segment of Goodlette Frank Road (CR -851) are significantly
impacted by this project.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): The project as proposed is consistent
with the policies in Objective 6.1 and 7.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element
(CCME), for the following reasons:
- Policy 61:
The NNUMC MPUD is a mixed -use project with Commercial and Community Facility uses in the
Urban Designated Area and therefore under current code is subject to providing 15% native
vegetation. This site has 7.96 acres existing native vegetation; 15% is 1.19 acres required and to be
preserved. Selection of preservation areas are consistent with the criteria listed in Policy 6.1.1. of the
CCME.
Policy 7.1.2:
In accordance with Policy 7.1.2, a wildlife survey for the NNUMC property has been prepared. It is
included as attachment to the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). An offsite relocation perm t
from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) was received and the tortoise
on the property have been relocated to the City Gate recipient site in the northern Picayune Strand
State Forest.
GMP Conclusion: Based upon the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed
rezone consistent with the FLUE.
ANALYSIS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a
determination must be based. These criteria are specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC)
Section 10.02.13. The staff evaluation establishes a factual basis to support the recommendations of
staff. The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) uses these same criteria as the basis for the
recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support
Page 7 of 16
PUDZ - 2008 -AR- 13375, NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 6/7/10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 16 of 266
their action on the rezoning request. These evaluations are completed and are listed under the
Rezoned Findings and PUD Findings on the proceeding pages of this Staff Report.
Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD
documents to address any environmental concerns. This petition was required to submit an
Environment Impact Statement (EIS) and a hearing before the Environmental Advisory Commission
(EAC) was required because the site is greater than 10 acres.
The property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands. A formal wetland jurisdictional has been
completed by the SFWMD (South Florida Water !Management District).
The proposed use of the property is a MPUD and therefore 15 percent of the existing native vegetation
on the property is required to be preserved. Staff worked with the applicant to select an appropriate
preserve location. The rear of the property is mostly monoculture of exotic vegetation or high
percentage of exotic vegetation. This resulted in placing the 1.19 acre preserve in the southwest
corner of the property abutting the various casements on the property. The preserve constitutes some
of the best habitat on the property and includes a number of large oak trees. The specific
configuration of the preserve can be found on the Master Concept Plan.
A protected species survey was conducted in 2007. During the survey, 19 active, 10 inactive, and 10
abandoned burrows were flagged in the field, An offsite relocation perm t from the FFWCC was
received and the tortoise on the property have been relocated to the City Gate recipient site in the
northern Picayune Strand State Forest. All burrows on the property were excavated on July 30, 31,
and August 1. 2008, by Jeremy Sterk of Davidson Engineering and Ray Ashton of the Ashton
Biodiversity Organization. A total of 12 tortoises were excavated from the property and relocated to
the approved recipient site. It appeared that individual tortoise on the NNUMC property were utilizing
more than one burrow; this would explain the low density based on the number of burrows excavated.
Field data sheets and appropriate information were forwarded to the FFWCC after completion of the
relocation.
Trans,T)ort(lrion Rc) ic _: Transportation Department Staff has reviewed the petition and is
recommending approval subject to the Transportation Commitments provided in Exhibit F of the
attached PUD Ordinance. In addition, certain uses within this PUD may cause significant peak event
traffic. Therefore. Transportation Department Staff will require a detailed traffic analysis report when
the site is developed. Additional restrictions, site related access improvements, and event traffic
control provided by the Sherriff's Nfice may be required.
Utility Review: The Utilities Department Staff has reviewed the petition, has no objection and notes
the followine: This project is located within the Collier County -Sewer District boundaries per the
2008 Water & Wastewater Master Plan Updates. At the time of SDP (Site Development Plan) this
project is subject to the conditions associated with a �Vater and Sewer Availability Letter from the
Collier County Public Utilities Division. All portions of this project to be developed shall be required
to comply with current Ordinance 2007 -60. Per County GIS (Geographic Information S� °stem), there
are an existing 24 -inch water main and l 6 -inch force main located along Goodlette -Frank Road North.
Emercency Alanaeement Review: F_mergency Management staff provided the following comment:
The North Naples United Methodist Church is located in a Category 3 hurricane surge zone. which
Page 8 of 16
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 13375, NORTH NAPLES UNGED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 6/7/10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 17 of 266
requires evacuation during some hurricane events. The Emergency Management Department has no
issues with this rezone.
Zoning Review: Relationship to Existing and Future Land Uses: A discussion of this relationship, as
it applies specifically to Collier County's legal basis for land use planning, refers to the relationship of
the uses that would be permitted if the proposed zoning action is approved, as it relates to the
requirement or limitations set forth in the FLUE of the GMP. The proposed uses, as limited in the
CPUD Ordinance, are consistent with the GMP, as previously noted. The actual uses proposed, as
limited in the CPUD Ordinance, should be compatible with the land uses that have been developed on
adjacent tracts.
LDC Subsection 10.03.05.1. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show
that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following
when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning
Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria
(italicized) as also noted below:
Rezone Findings:
1. Id %hether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and
future land use map and the elements of the GMP.
As noted in the GMP Consistency portion of this report, the proposed uses and development standards
would generally further the goals and objectives of the FLUE and the applicable portions of the
CCME and the Transportation Element. Therefore staff recommendation that this petition be deemed
consistent with the GMP.
2. The existing land use pattern.
As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report, the neighborhood's
existing land use pattern is characterized by developed church uses to the north, developed middle
school uses to the east, developed office and retail uses to the south and developed residential uses to
the west.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
As previously stated, the proposed North Naples United Methodist Church MPUD is located adjacent
to and south of the existing North Naples United Methodist Church which is located within the 300
Acre Goodlette Road PUD. The proposed North Naples United Methodist Church MPUD is also
located east of an existing school and north of existing retail and office land uses. In addition, the
PUD includes adequate ameliorating elements for buffering, building height and setback, to ensure
that the project is compatible with the adjoining Church, school, and office and retail land uses.
'Therefore, Staff is of the opinion that the proposed MPUD will not result in an isolated district
unrelated to nearby districts-
$. Whether existing district boundaries are illogicaliv drairn in relation to existing conditions on
the property proposed for change.
Page 9 of 16
PUDZ - 2008 -AR- 13375, NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 6/7/10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 18 of 266
As shown on the zoning map included at the beginning of this report, the existing district boundaries
are logically drawn. The PUD zoning boundaries follow the property ownership boundaries.
S. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of rite proposed amendment
necessary.
The proposed change is not necessary, per se: but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC
provisions to seek such changes. Please also note that the petitioner contends that rezoning is
necessary to allow for the expansion of the adjacent North Naples United Methodist Church onto the
subject site.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood.
The County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP
support the approval of the uses proposed at this location. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed
rezone is consistent with the County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) of the GMP. In addition, the PUD document provides assurances that the site
improvements will include adequate landscaping, setbacks and buffering for the development. Lastly,
that the proposed Church uses are compatible with the existing Church uses to the north. Therefore,
staff is of the opinion that the proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volutes or
projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development,
or othenrise affect public safety.
The Transportation Services Staff has reviewed the proposed MPUD and has incorporated appropriate
mitigation of the projects traffic impacts into the MPUD document which renders the MPUD
consistent with the Transportation Element. Therefore. the proposed MPUD will not excessively
increase traffic congestion and is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element.
8. Whether lite proposed change will create a drauutge problc,in.
Appropriate stormwater management has been provided on the Concept Drainage Plan to address this
issue. The proposed development should not create drainage or surface water problems because the
LDC specifically addresses prerequisite development standards as part of the local development order
process that are designed to reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. Any proposed water
management and drainage system will need to he designed to ptcvcnt drainage problems on site and be
compatible with the adjacent eater management systems. Additionally, the LDC and GMP have
regulations in place that will ensure reaicsa for drainage on new developments.
9. Whether the proposed change will serioue /Y reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
The proposed rezone will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas outside the PUD. Furthermore. the
PUD document provides adequate property development regulations to ensure light and air should not
he seriously reduced to adjacent areas. 'fhe Master Concept Plan further demonstrates that the
Page 10 of 16
PUDZ- 2008 -4R- 13375. NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 677110
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 19 of 266
locations of proposed preserve and open space areas should further ensure light and air should not be
seriously reduced to adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area.
Since the project is consistent with the GMP and the LDC, staff is of the opinion this MPUD will not
adversely impact property values. However, this is a subjective determination based upon anticipated
results which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a
host of factors including zoning; however zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value
determination is driven by market value. There is no guarantee that the project will be marketed in a
manner comparable to the surrounding developments.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
Properties around this property are already developed as previously noted. The basic premise
underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that sound application, when combined with
the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that
a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property.
Therefore, the proposed rezoning should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
The proposed development complies with the GMP, a public policy statement supporting Zoning
actions when they are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed
change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further
determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public
interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with
existing zoning.
The property is presently undeveloped. The subject property could be developed within existing
Agricultural zoning regulation.
1.1. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs oj'the neighborhood or the counn.
The PUD document and the allowable development has been found consistent with the GMP. The
GMP is a policy statement which has evaluated the scale, density and intensity of land uses deemed to
be acceptable throughout the urban - designated areas of Collier County. Staff is of the opinion that the
development standards and the developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale
with the needs of the community.
15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.
Page 11 of 16
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 13375, NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 6/7!10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 20 of 266
The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does
not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition.
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be
required to make the property usable,for anv of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning
classification.
Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require considerable site alteration and this
project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development
regulations during the site development plan approval process and again later as part of the building
permit process.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in t,rre Collier County 'GA1P and as defined and
implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance.
The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public
Facilities. The project must demonstrate consistency with all applicable goals and objectives of the
GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by County Staff that is
responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process. and that staff has
concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem
important in the protection of the public health, safety and welfare.
To be determined by the BCC during its ads'ertised public hearing.
PUD I 'if din c's:
1. The suitability of the area fm- the type and patter-ti of aerelopment proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the laad, surrounding areas, traffic crud access, drainage, selver, abater,
and other utilities.
The type and pattern of development proposed should not have a negative impact upon any physical
characteristics of the land, the surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, server, water, and other
utilities. Furthermore. this project, if developed, v011 he required to comply with all county
regulations regarding drainage, sewer, water and other utilities pursuant to Section 6.02.00 Adequate
Public Facilities Requirements of the LDC.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract,
or other instruments, or for amendotent�s in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to
arrtmgements or provisions to be made for the comnming operation and maintenance of such areas
mid facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense.
Page 12 of 16
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 1375, NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 611110
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 21 of 266
Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control. The
- MPUD document and the general LDC development regulations make appropriate provisions for the
continuing operation and maintenance of common areas.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and policies
o f the GMP (GMP).
County Staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives
and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this Staff Report. Based on that analysis, Staff
is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
The development standards, landscaping and buffering requirements contained in this petition are
designed to make the proposed uses compatible with the adjacent uses and the use mixture within the
project itself. Staff believes that this petition is compatible, both internally and externally, with the
proposed uses and with the existing undeveloped land. Additionally, the Development Commitments
contained in the PUD document provide additional requirements the developer will have to fulfill.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC.
6 The tinning or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilities, both public and private.
Although development of the project has not yet commenced, the timing or sequence of development
in light of concurrency requirements does not appear to be a significant problem for this project based
upon the transportation commitments contained in the PUD document. In addition, the project's
development must be in compliance with all other applicable concurrency management regulations
when development approvals are sought.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
Ability, as applied in this context, implies supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal
system, potable water supplies, and capacity of roads, is supportive of conditions emanating from
urban development.
S. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the
particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public
purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding
Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and
Page 13 of 16
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 13375, NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 6/7/10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 22 of 266
objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by County
Staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and
those Staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted.
Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking two deviations from the requirements of the LDC.
The deviations are found in PUD Exhibit E.
Deviation # 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 CA., which requires an Alternative D Landscape
Buffer to allow no landscape buffer along the entry drive providing access from Goodlette -Frank
Road. If the property, or portions of the property are developed as non- church related uses, the
developer shall refer to the landscape buffering requirements outlined in the LDC at the time of site
development.
Petitioner's Rationale:
This deviation would eliminate redundant buffering between similar /associated uses if tire rezone
parcel were to be developed as a church or with related use( s). The parcel immediately north of the
entry drive is currently used for parking for the existing church sanctuary. No buffer exists since
parking is provided for directly off the access drive onto grassed areas. Should the proposed MPUD
utilize the area immediately south of the access drive for parking, a similar configuration which has
worked for nearly 10 years would be desirable. If however, a non - church use, such as an ALF were to
be constructed, then the buffering required by the LDC would be provided.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends
approval finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated
that "the element may he waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the
community" and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is
"justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such
reculations. "
Deviation # 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.G. Spaces Required. which requires that multi-
family clubhouse structures provide parking spaces at a ratio of I parking space per 200 square feet
and swimming pools require parking spaces at I per 75 square feet for the first 1,000 square feet and i
for each additional 125 square feet Of' water areas, in order to allow parking for a clubhouse and
outdoor pool associated with an ALi al a ratio of I parking space per 800 square feet. or 25 Se of the
required clubhouse parking standard.
Petitioner's Rationale:
This deviation seeks to simplify the parking requirements for a clubhouse for group care housing units.
The proposed deviation would provide sufficient puling for all potential tenants, tenant visitors and
employees of a proposed assisted living facility at a much lower rate of what is required in the LDC:
because of the limited likelihood of tenants driving and or retaining automobiles on -site to access the
clubhouse and pool amenities. It is assumed tenants would he less likely to drive or require parking for
a vehicle because the facilities would be pedestrian accessible to them from their units. Therefore the
lessening of the parking requirement is justified.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends
approval finding that. in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3. the petitioner has demonstrated
Page 14 of 16
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 12375, NORTH NAPL -S UNITED METHCD'ST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MPUD)
Rev: 6/7/10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 23 of 266
that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the
community" and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is
"justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such
regulations."
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
The EAC heard this petition on May 5, 2010, and voted 5 -0 to approve this petition. There are no
stipulations.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The agent/applicant duly noticed and held the required NIM on October 22, 2009, at 6:00 p.m. at the
North Naples United Methodist Church. In attendance were the applicant's team and county staff.
There were no people from the public present.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for Petition PUDZ - 2008 -AR- 13375, revised
on June 7, 2010.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition PUDZ-
2008 -AR -13375 to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval
subject to the conditions of approval that have been incorporated in the Ordinance of Adoption.
Attachments: A. PUD Ordinance
Page 15 of 16
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 133'5. NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 6x7/10
PREPARED BY:
� 111 a�k dl�-O" (Azh'
NANCY GU. DLAQ-JI. AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
DEPARTMEI�OF A'ND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
I-Roll /Ia1 "II I 1p
� \ � ,
RAYM� D V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
'1
i ILLIA%115. LOR NZ. 11 = P.E.. DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
APPROVED BY:
NICK CASALANGUIDA, 1)�'f;CITi- AlAIINISTItAT01�
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Collier County Planning Commission:
y A.
MARK P. ST RA CI LAIR \IAN
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 24 of 266
- Zf..10
DATE
mss-_ zs. zC;<6
DATE
G -7 -10
DATE
DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the July 27, 2010, Board of County Commissioners Meeting
Page 16 of 16
PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 13375, NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST
MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
Rev: 5/26/10
o
o �
N
_ � m
CL
c
a
i
a
/ I
3�lap ' I
3`JOIy I
I
3nn3nv
7
g —
xosox,Al I
LF Ash �� s s ° a� i� 00 s -
ee
e' d� Ov —_Tg�' ;-
�
�
e a :
kmR�
rt" mon ..v 3.,n000 „
is
GULF OF MEXICO
cQ
G
Z
Z
O
N
C�
G
Z
O
Q
U
O
J
M
Q
m
o,
of
N�
Q
a
u
z
0
w�
a
�
J
1
1
�
�
U
0
a
I
a
N
a
e
lise- a a)
n
Otlbe3l00B
MNVtld
a
/ I
3�lap ' I
3`JOIy I
I
3nn3nv
7
g —
xosox,Al I
LF Ash �� s s ° a� i� 00 s -
ee
e' d� Ov —_Tg�' ;-
�
�
e a :
kmR�
rt" mon ..v 3.,n000 „
is
GULF OF MEXICO
cQ
G
Z
Z
O
N
C�
G
Z
O
Q
U
O
J
M
Q
m
o,
of
N�
Q
a
u
z
0
w�
a
0
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET
1 �„11NH
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 26 of 266
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 403 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR:
❑ AMENDMENT TO PUD (PUDA) ® PUD REZONE (PUDZ) ❑ PUD TO PUD REZONE (PUDZ -A)
PETITION NO (AR)
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER To Ge cvunple�rd Gc siq //
DATE PROCESSED
ASSIGNED PLANNER
APPLICANT INFORMATION
NAME OF APPLICANTM; NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INC
ADDRESS: 6000 GOODLETTE -FRANK ROAD CITY: NAPLES _ STATE: FL ZIP: 34109
TELEPHONE #: (239) 593 -7600 CELL #: N A _ FAX #: (239) 593 -7609
E -MAIL ADDRESS: DBARBEROBCBECOM
NAME OF AGENT: TIM HANCOCK, AICP, DAVIDSON ENGINEERING INC
ADDRESS: 3530 KRAFT RD SUITE 301 CITY: NAPLES STATE: FL ZIP: 34105
TELEPHONE #: (239) 434 -6060 CELL #: NIA _ FAX #: (239) 434 -6084
E -MAIL ADDRESS: TIM @DAVIDSONENGINEERING COM
NAME OF AGENT: RICHARD YOVANOVICH, P.A., GOODLETTE COLEMAN, JOHNSON. YOVANOVICH &
KOESTER
ADDRESS: 4001 TAMIAMI TRAIL N. CITY: NAPLES STATE: FL ZIP: 34103
TELEPHONE #: (239) 435 -3535 CELL #: N/A FAX #: (239) 435 -1218
E -MAIL ADDRESS: RYOVANOV1CHCdGCJLAW.COM
BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF
ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS.
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rceone 1 '2,07
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 27 of 266
ASSOCIATIONS
Complete the following for all Association(s) affiliated with this petition. Provide additional
sheets if necessary.
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: AUTUMN WOODS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.
MAILING ADDRESS: 8359 BEACON BLVD STE 213 CITY: FORT MYERS STATE: FL ZIP: 33907
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: PINE RIDGE CIVIC ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED
MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 640115 CITY: BEVERLY HILLS STATE: fL ZIP: 34464
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: _......__�_
MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP.
NAME OF MASTER ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS CITY _ STATE ZIP
NAME OF CIVIC ASSOCIATION:
MAILING ADDRESS CITY _ STATE ZIP
I Disclosure of Interest Information I
a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety,
tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as
well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Name and Address
Application For Public I- leaving For PCU Rezone 1;22,07
Percentage of Ownership
LJ
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 28 of 266
b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and
the percentage of stock owned by each.
Name and Address Percentage of Ownership
NNUMC Inc.
1000
Board of Directors
John Sampson
Officer
Don Barber
Officer
Wally Hultman
Officer
Ronald Gustason
Officer
Elizabeth Krier _ .,
Officer
Bruce R. Antle
Officer
*not for profit, no stock issued
C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the
percentage of interest.
Name and Address Percentage of Ownership
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name
of the general and /or limited partners.
Name and Address Percentage of Ownership
Applianiun Fir P,hj, ticunng Fnr PUD Rcame 1 22117
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 29 of 266
e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a
Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers
below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners.
Name and Address Percentage of Ownership
Date of Contract:
f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all
individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust.
Name and Address
g. Date subject property acquired ® leased ❑ Term of lease yrs. /mos.
Response: Subject Property was acquired February, 2003 by North Naples United
Methodist Church
If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following:
Date of option:
Date option terminates: , or
Anticipated closing date
h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur
subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing,
it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit
a supplemental disclosure of interest form.
�1
L J
Application For I'ublic Hwring for PUD Rezone 1'22,07
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 30 of 266
PROPERTY LOCATION
Detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on
separate page.) If request involves change to more then one zoning district, include separate legal
description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey
(completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre - application
meeting.
NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning
the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required.
Section /Township /Range 10 /_ 49 S / 25 E
Lot: Block: ., Subdivision:
Plat Book...,. - .._ Page #:__ _ Property I.D. #: 00240280907
Metes & Bounds Description: Please see attached.
Size of property: ±734 __Ft. X ±774 ft. = Total Sq. Ft. ±568.116 Acres ±13.0
Address /general location of subject property: The project site is located immediately Eat of Goodlette Fronk
Rood, approximately 1,500 feet north of Pine Ridge Road
PUD District (LDC 2.03.06): ❑ Residential ❑ Community Facilities
❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
Zoning
Land use
N PUD
Mixed Use (Residential and Church)
S PUD
Improved Commercial
E A
Public School — Pine Ridge Middle School
W ROW /A
Goodlette -Frank Road /Single -Fawn# Residential
Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject property? If so, give
complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separate
page).
Response: Yes.
Section /Township /Range: _ 10 / 49 S _/_ 25 E
Lot: __ __ Block: Subdivision:
Plat Book Page #: Property I.D. #: 00240280208
Metes & Bounds Description:
•
Application For PuNbc Humoring For PUD Itrcnne 12?.f17
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 31 of 266
All That Pori of Section 10 Township 49 South Range 25 East Collier County Florida being more
particularly described as follows• Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 10;
thence along the east line of said Section 10 South 00 033158" East 2629.71 feet to the East '/a comer of
said Section 10• thence continue alona the east line of said Section 10 South 00°46'24" East 239.12 feet;
thence leaving the east line of said Section 10 South 89 °29'57" West 1200.90 feet to The Point of
Beginning; thence continue South 89 °29'57" west 1020.50 feet to the easterly right -of -way line of Frank
Boulevard (C-85 1) as recorded in Plat Book 13 page 58 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida
thence along said easterly right -of- -way line North 07 °O6' 13" East 1527.61 feet • thence leaving said
easterly right-of-way line South 82 053147" East 513 04 feet; thence South 07°06'13" West 496.14 feeU
thence South 47°08'15" East 331 00 feet, • thence South 20°51'21" West 213.00 feet, • thence South
07006'13" West 248.75 feet • thence South 41 °29'30" East 374.00 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Containina 23.00 acres more or less Subiecf to easements and restrictions of record. Bearinas are based on
the east line of said Section 10, beina 00 °33'58" East.
REZONE REQUEST
This application is requesting a rezone from the __A- zoning district(s) to the MPUD zoning district(s).
Present Use of the Property: Vacant Land
Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Community Facility ALF and Public Use
Original PUD Name: Ordinance No.:
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Pursuant to Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code, staff's analysis and
recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the
Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below.
Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted
below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request.
PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.8)
The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical
characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other
utilities.
Response: This Petition seeks to convert 13.0 acres of land zoned Agricultural (A) to Mixed -Use
Planned Unit Development (MPUD) for the development of limited community facility and
church uses The property is bounded by Goodlette Frank Rood to the west and Pine Ridge
Middle School to the east Access to the site will be via Goodlette Frank Rood The
adjacent properties to the north and the south pre occupied by institutional and
Application For Public Heunng For PUD Rcznnc 1'222!07
Agenda Item No, 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 32 of 266
�1
f•_J
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or
other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to
arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas
and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and
recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney.
Response: The land is owned by the Petitioner Any common areas within the proiect including all
preserve areas will bg owned and maintained by the property owner, or subseavent
property owner or designated associationfs)
3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management
plan.
Response: The Proposed Droiect is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan
fCCGMP) through the aoalication of the development standards contained in this MPUD
The proposed Proiect is consistent with the following specific Policies and objectives
Policy 5.4 of the CCGMP• The Proposed development is compatible with and
complimentary to surrounding land uses in that the Property to the north is owned by the
applicant and the development of this property will be associated with the existing church
use. The subject parcel is also compatible with the properties to the south as they are
designated PUD with existing and vacant commercial uses. Furthermore the Properties
surrounding the subiect parcel to the west are separated via Goodlette Fronk Road while
the Property to the east is developed as a public use (Pine Ridge Middle School) All of the
surrounding Properties will be sufficiently buffered in accordance with LDC requirements
Policy 2.2.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element ICCMEj is furthered by
the water management design of the project which utilizes dry and wef retention areas for
water management As a result the cumulative impacts of run -off are reduced and water
quality treatment is improved
The Droiect development is planned to Protect the function of natural drainage features
and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in Obiective 1.5 of the
Drainage Sub- Element of the Public Facilities Element
The proiect shall be in compliance with Obiective 3.1 of the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element of the Growth Management Plan
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions
on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements.
Response: The Proposed MPUD complies with the buffering requirements for community facilities and
adacent land uses set forth in the LDC and GRIP The proposed uses setback requirements
and maximum building height are consistent with existing and Potential adjacent land uses
Apphca lan For Pnbh, Hcvnnk Fnr PUD KC7011C 1'2;(17
commercial uses res a gvel . The Proposed
omiect will comR/y with
all buffer
reguirements set forth in the Collier County
sewer services exist in this area and the
Land Development Code Central water ancj
proposed proiect will not adversely affect the
current Level of Service /LOST Based
upon these factors the proposed
proiect is
compatible with the adiacent properties
�1
f•_J
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or
other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to
arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas
and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and
recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney.
Response: The land is owned by the Petitioner Any common areas within the proiect including all
preserve areas will bg owned and maintained by the property owner, or subseavent
property owner or designated associationfs)
3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management
plan.
Response: The Proposed Droiect is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan
fCCGMP) through the aoalication of the development standards contained in this MPUD
The proposed Proiect is consistent with the following specific Policies and objectives
Policy 5.4 of the CCGMP• The Proposed development is compatible with and
complimentary to surrounding land uses in that the Property to the north is owned by the
applicant and the development of this property will be associated with the existing church
use. The subject parcel is also compatible with the properties to the south as they are
designated PUD with existing and vacant commercial uses. Furthermore the Properties
surrounding the subiect parcel to the west are separated via Goodlette Fronk Road while
the Property to the east is developed as a public use (Pine Ridge Middle School) All of the
surrounding Properties will be sufficiently buffered in accordance with LDC requirements
Policy 2.2.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element ICCMEj is furthered by
the water management design of the project which utilizes dry and wef retention areas for
water management As a result the cumulative impacts of run -off are reduced and water
quality treatment is improved
The Droiect development is planned to Protect the function of natural drainage features
and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in Obiective 1.5 of the
Drainage Sub- Element of the Public Facilities Element
The proiect shall be in compliance with Obiective 3.1 of the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element of the Growth Management Plan
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions
on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements.
Response: The Proposed MPUD complies with the buffering requirements for community facilities and
adacent land uses set forth in the LDC and GRIP The proposed uses setback requirements
and maximum building height are consistent with existing and Potential adjacent land uses
Apphca lan For Pnbh, Hcvnnk Fnr PUD KC7011C 1'2;(17
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 33 of 266
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development.
e nse• The subject Property is currently undeveloped, the Proposed Project will meet or exceed
the required open space per the LDC
6 The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available
improvements and facilities, both public and private.
Response: The Project will comply with the County Adequate Public Facilities ordnance where
applicable The site will be served by central water and sewer.
The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
Response: There is no practical room for further exoonsion.
N. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the
particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public
purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
Response: The proposed MPUD complies with all applicable regulations set forth in the Collier County
Land Development Code for a community facility development.
Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many
communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association
in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected
by existing deed restrictions.
Previous land use petitions on the subject Property' To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held
on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ® No
If so, what was the nature of that hearing? _ _..._....
NOTICE:
This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made
and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered
"closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply
necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning for a period of
six (6) months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application
"closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re-
opened by submitting a new application, repayment of all application fees and granting of a
determination of "sufficiency ". Further review of the project will be subject to the then current code.
(LDC Section 10.03.05.Q.)
Application km Puhlk Hr.,,ny Fur PUD R".,,c 1'_ -.07
i
Cl
0
`J
•
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 34 of 266
DAV IDS9N
PROJECT NARRATIVE
The subject property is located east of Goodlette -Frank Road, ± 0.3 of a mile north of
Pine Ridge Road and is 13.0 acres in size.
The rezone petition seeks to convert the subject property currently zoned Agricultural (A)
to Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) for the development of limited
community facility and church or church - related uses. The property is bound by
Goodlette -Frank Road to the west and Pine Ridge Middle School to the east. The
adjacent properties to the north and the south are occupied by institutional (North Naples
United Methodist Church) and commercial uses respectively. Access to the project will
be via a shared access drive with the northern parcel connecting to Goodlette Frank Road.
The proposed mixed -use project will provide sufficient buffering and screening as set
forth in the PUD document and supplemented with the requirement outlined in the
Collier County Land Development Code. Central water and sewer services exist in this
area and will be provided to the proposed project. The project will not adversely affect
the current Level of Service (LOS). The project will act as a transitional use between the
neighboring properties of varying intensities from a church to the north, a middle school
to the east, office commercial to the south and single - family residential beyond the
Goodlette -Frank road right -of -way to the west.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 35 of 266
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN COMPLIANCE NARRATIVE
This rezone petition proposes to rezone a t 13 acre parcel of land (the "Property ") from
Agricultural (A) to Mixed -Use PUD (MPUD) for the development of church, church related and
limited community facility uses. The property is located East of Goodlette Frank road, t 0.3 of a
mile north of Pine Ridge Road. It is hounded by Goodlette Frank Road to the west with the Pine
Ridge community further west across Goodlette Road. To the north is the existing North Naples
United Methodist Church which is located within the 300 Acre Goodlette Road PUD. To the east
lies Pine Ridge Middle School and to the south is the Pine Ridge Commons PUD which contains
a variety of commercial uses including office, retail and fast food uses. County water and sewer
service is available to serve the Property. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Urban
Land Use Designation in the Future Land Use Element and represent compatible land uses with
the surrounding properties.
The project as proposed furthers the goals and objectives of the GMP as follows:
• The project will achieve consistency with Objective 2 through the demonstration of
facility and system capacity at each stage of the development order process as applicable.
• The project is in the Northwest TCMA and has demonstrated compliance with Policy 2.5
and 2.6 through an up -to -date traffic analysis.
• The rezone is in the form of a PUD (MPUD) in accordance with Policy 6.5.
• The project will be connected to the church to the North and will thus demonstrate
consistency with Policy 7.3 through interconnection with the adjacent development.
The proposed rezone will change the land uses permitted on the Property from agriculture to
those primarily associated with public and community facility uses. The Property will be
adequately buffered firom surrounding development via landscaping required by Section 4.06.02
of the LDC and Section E of the approved PUD document.
I
•
•
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 36 of 266
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS
FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST
APPLICANT INFORMATION
NAME OF APPLICANT(S): NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INC
ADDRESS: 6000 GOODLETTE -FRANK ROAD CITY: NAPLES STATE: FL ZIP:34109
TELEPHONE #: 12391 593 -7600 CELL #: NSA _ FAX #: 23 5 3 -7609
E -MAIL ADDRESS: DBARSER(dSCBECOM
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): NO STREET ADDRESS,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Section /Township /Range: 10 / 49S /_ 25E
Lot: __. -_ Block: _ Subdivision:
Plat Book_ — _ Page #: -. Property I.D. #: 00240280907
Metes & Bounds Description:
ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHERLY N CORNER
OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA THENCE ALONG
NORTH -SOUTH N SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 10 NORTH 01 °18'35" WEST 62.79 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY OF PINE RIDGE ROAD (S .R. 896) THENCE ALONG SAID
BOUNDARY, SOUTH 89 °07'52" WEST 9.57 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT
OF WAY OF FRANK BOULEVARD, 100 FOOT RIGHT -OF -WAY AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13 PAGE
58 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
454.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURV CONCAVE THE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF
5679.65 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04 °34'51 " AND BEING SUBTENDED B Y A CHORD
WHICH BEARS NORTH 04 °48'48" EAST 452.9-6 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING THE POINT OF BEGINNING
OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH
07°06' 13" EAST 1102.02 FEEL AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY NORTH 07 °06'13" EA�FEET TTHENCE
LEAVING SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY NORTH 89 °29157" EAST 676.40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY
OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O R BOOK 503 PAGE 206; THENCE ALONG SAID
BOUNDARY SOUTH 00 °46'24" EAST 775.71 FEET THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY SOUTH 89-29,571,
WEST 783.65 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF SAID FRANK BOULEVARD
AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED.
TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED
(Check applicable system):
COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
a. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
b. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM []
PROVIDE NAME
d. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT F]
(GPD capacity)___
Appki line For Public HcurinK Fur PLID Rownc 1 22/07
e. SEPTIC SYSTEM
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS — page 2
a.
b.
C.
d.
x
TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED
COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL)
TOTAL POPULATION TO BE SERVED:
El
60.800 sa ft (15 GPD average)
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 37 of 266
PEAK AND AVERAGE DAILY DEMANDS:
A. WATER -PEAK: 36.480 GPD AVERAGE DAILY: 9.120 GPD
B. SEWER -PEAK: 36.480 GPD AVERAGE DAILY: 9.120 GPD
IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM,
PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED:
RESPONSE: An exact date is not know at this time Connection to existing service will be contingent
rezone approval.
NARRATIVE STATEMENT: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic
drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding
the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then
percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a
professional engineer.
RESPONSE: The sanitary sewer will be collected throughout the site with a series of pipes A lift station
will then pump the sewage into an existing 16" force main running down the East side of
Goodlette frank Road.
COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: If the project is located within the
services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall
be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and
sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these
facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time. This
statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges
and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of
building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an
agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer
systems.
RESPONSE: Service and subseauent statement of dedication is contingent upon rezone approval
Applicwiun For Public Halting for PUD ne7nna 1'22107
10
11
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 38 of 266
STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY CAPACITY FROM OTHER PROVIDERS: Unless waived or
otherwise provided for at the pre - application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or
potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that
provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided.
RESPONSE: N/A.
Appiicaum PorPuhhc Hump For PUD Rezone 1/22/07
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 39 of 266
E
DAV IDS�ON
�1� SUPPLEMENTAL DEVIATION AND JUS'T'IFICATION SUMMARY
1. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02(C)4, Buffer Yard Requirements,
which requires an Alternative D Landscape Buffer to allow no landscape buffer along
the entry drive providing access from Goodlette - Frank Road. If the property, or
portions of the property, are developed as non- church related uses, the developer shall
refer to the landscaping requirements outlined in the LDC at the time of site
development.
Summary: This deviation would eliminate redundant buffc ring hetween
similar /as.socicned uses if the rezone parcel were hr be developed as a church or with
related use(s). The parcel immediately north of the entry drive is used for parking fnr
the existing church sctnctuary . No buffer exists shWC parking is provided for directly
off the access drive onto grassed areas Should the proposed MP(If) utilize the area
immediately south of the access drive Lor parking a similar conLiigru•ation which has
worked for nearly 10 vears would be desirah(e. lfhowever, a tLon- church use such
as an ALF were to be constructed then the bu ering required by the LDC would be
Provided.
2. A deviation from LDC Section 4.05.04.G which states that multi- family clubhouse
structures require parking spaces at a ratio of I parking space per 200 square feet and
swimming pools require parking spaces at 1 per 75 square feet for the first 1,000
square feet and each additional 125 square feet of water areas, in order to provide
parking for the clubhouse and pool at a ratio of 1 parking space per 800 square leet,
or 25% of the standard clubhouse parking standard.
Summary: This deviation seeks to simplify the parking requirements fnr a clubhouse_
or -rov cgre housing units_ The proposed devicrtior2 would pwoarld provide sufficient
parking for all potential tenants tenant visitors and cmplovees op posed assisted
living facility at a much Lower rate of what is required in tlbe LDC because of the
limited likelihood of tenants driving and or retainmy automobiles nn -site to access
the clubhouse and pool amenities. It's assumed tenants would be less likely to drive
or require parking for a vehicle because the facilities would be pedestrian accessible
to them from their units. Therefore the lessening of the parkin requirement is
justified.
� • Ih \.ihid, i Lad \;a'�, d �� l Loy l `.1 Iii. U.
1u,��ili?PC¢I11 UCi mli;m lu'1:1K.ilic0 A `� rvmun � a��� fci I.nnglluuiu. ^_.cum
CCLSI ER CCUNfY GONERNVENr
DEPT. CF ZCN M & LAN) DEVELCPNENr REVI EW
MIN CCLLI ERGCN. NET
Dot e: /_X
Firm
n%
Pr of Oct I
Site:
C�er
Appi i cant
Phone:
Otter
Phone:
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 40 of 266
2800 NCRTH HCRSESHCE DR] VE --
NAPLES, FLCRIDA 34104
( 239) 403-2400 FAX ( 239) 643.6968
PRE- APPLICATION MEETING NOTES
PUD Rezone (PUDZ)
PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDZ -A)
❑ PUD Amendment (PUDA)
,/
Si x& of Project
j 13
Wner lo^
Addr es s: G t y State FL Zl PL01-7zA
Existing PUD Name and Number %I`_�
Assigned Planner
Meeting Attendees: (at t ach Si gn I n Sheet)
-t —
GACurrent \Pre- Application Forms 2006 \PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment PUD to PUD Rezone pre -app
050404.doc
CA
r-
Subrri ft all r equi r enenf s ( see next pa99 yheekl i st) q,
Agendal'em No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 41 of 266
-2_
G:1Current\Pre- Application Forms 2006\PUD Rezone, PUD Amendment PUD to PUD Rezone pre -app
050404.doc
PUD REZONE (PUDZ) V July 27, 2010
PUD to PUD REZONE (PUDZ -A) Page 42 of 266
PUD AMENDMENT(PUDA)
APPLICATION
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW W /COVEn
SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION.
NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
REQUIREMENTS
# OF
COPIES
REQUIRED
NOT
REQUIRED
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS:
1 Additional set If located in the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle
Redevelopment Area)
1�
Copies of detailed description of why amendment is necessary
24
Completed Application (download from websile for current form)
24
Pre-application meeting notes
24
PUD Document & Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36" and One 8 1/2" x 11" copy
24
Revised Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36 "and One 8 1/2" x 1 1" copy
24
Original PUD document and Master Plan 24" x 30'— ONLY IF AMENDING
THEPUD
24
Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined
24
Revised PUD document w amended Title page w ord Ws, LDC 10.02.13..4.2
24
2 Copies of the following:
Deeds /Legal's & Survey (if boundary of original PUD is amended)
2
List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation
2
Owner /Affidavit signed & notarized
2
Covenant of Unified Control
2
Completed Addressing checklist
2
Enviramnentoi Impact Statement (EIS) and digital /electronic copy of EIS or
exemption justification
3
Historical Survey or waiver request
4
Utility Provisions Statement w /sketches
4
Architectural rendering of proposed structures
4
Survey, signed & sealed
4
Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) or waiver
7
Aerial photographs (taken within the previous 12 months min. scaled
1"=200'), showin FLUCCS Codes, Legend, and project boundary
S
Electronic copy of all documents in Word format and plans (CDRom or
Diskette)1
Affordable Housing or Economic Development Council Projects:
❑ EDC "Fast Track" must submit approved copy of official
application
❑ Affordable Housing "Expedited" must submit copy of signed
Certificate of Agreement.
2
If located in RFMU,(Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas
Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. lacavera, State of Florida
Division of Forestry @- 239 -690 -3500 for Information regarding
"Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan ", LDC Section 2.03.08.A.2.a.(b)i.c.
-3— J
WCurrentTre- Application Forms 2006TUD Rezone, PUD Amendment PUD to PUD Rezone pre -app
050404.doc
r.
Fees: + Application Fee,
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
$10,000 (PUD Rezone) + $25 per acre (or fraction thereof) Page 43 of 266
4$'8,000 (PUD to PUD) + $25 per acre (or fraction thereof)
❑ $6,000 (PUD Amendment) + $25 per acre (or fraction thereof)
$150.00 Fire Code Review
$2,250.00 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review
$500.00 Pre - application fee ( Appl I tali ons subrd it ad 9 rant hs or rror a of ter t he dot a of
he I ast pro-app neet i ng shat I not be cr edi t ad t ovior ds appl i cot I on f ees and a
now pr e- appi i c at i on neet i ng vii I I be r equi r ad.
$729.00 Legal Advertising Fee for CCPC meeting (to be reconciled upon receipt of Invoice from Naples Daily
News).
$363.00 Legal Advertising Fee for BCC meeting
$2500.00 Environmental Impact Statement review fee
Property Owner Notification fees. Property Owner Notifications $1.00 Non - certified; $3.00 Codified return
receipt mail ( to be paid after receipt of invoice from Dept. of Zoning & Development Review)
Transportation Fees, if requirech
❑ $500.00 Methodology Review Fee, if required
$750.00 Minor Study Review Fee, if required
$1,500.00 Major Study Review Fee, if required
Fee Tot all S
PLANNER MARK IF NEEDED TO BE ROUTED TO REVIEWERS BELOW:
Comments should be forwarded to the Planner Driorto the due date
SCHOOL DISTRICT
PARKS & REC — Amanda Townsend
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
IMMOKALEE WATERISEWER DISTRICT
DRIEM7 — EMER. MGMT — Jim Von Rintein
UTILITIES ENGINEERING — Zamira Dettoro
CDES Coordinator — Linda B. Route Sheet
only
r�
�7
C
std r.%-,
Vz2 0"'res
Gp te4wt e A .`
Ake` -WI e*
-4-
G:1CurrentlPre- Application Forms 2006TUD Rezone, PUD Amendment PUD to PUD Rezone pre -app
050404.doc
t
1
m
m
c
Q.
0
m
m
0
'a
C
J
C
O
N
0
C
m
E
a
Q.
m
C
cl
a
e
N
m
V �
— o
W
1
W M
Z C.,1
Z
� d
4 E
W
Z Z
S2 m
N
O
d a
7
.0
tDt
M
N
Q
M
4
m
U
z
Z
W
W
S
9
Z
M
E
0
O
m
c
m
U„'
LL
-
•
'1
+1
•
' 1
\
1
1•
1
M
N
Q
M
4
m
U
z
Z
W
W
S
9
Z
M
E
0
O
m
c
m
U„'
LL
L
p
4
N
W
7
m
Q
'C
N
'i
9
Q
r
J
m
c
m
z
r
w
w
x
w
z
z
c
m
E
0
m
c
m
�7
�i:
1'row0avidmm Enginewing Zas 587 BIBS
COLLIER COUNTY 0OVERNMPJ f f AdPMbk
ADDRESSING MPARTMENT
Agenda Item No. 17C
071124 7 DB. � If84 July 27, 2010
4,�(2YIl�e6
2600 NORTH NbRSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, IFLCRIDA 34104
Planes ootllplata the 1161 ring and fax to the Addressing Daporbnent' at ,230 669 5724 or eupmlt in person >fl the
Addressng Deparhnent atthe above address
Form must be signed by Addressing Paraonnet prior to pra appllaetion meeting. Not all hums will apply In ovary project,
(lams N MiL type are required Parma oiler ttran $ mordha a1ti require adt$ wtal review and approval by the Addressing
II In bold
PE:TnIDN T VPS4 (oheckpavvon spa bafow, ocmPrals a aepamts Addracsrrig Chaddet lvr each PatNfon Type)
F-1 1 BL (Sleeting Pam)
ea (Baer DO& Edanaion)
Cl CamiwVCaaas Permit
( ❑] CU (Conditional Use)
EXP (EX0006an Permit)
FP LJ (Final plat
LLA (Lot Line Adlustment)
❑ PNC (Prd)act Name Cho e)
�❑ PK (Plena & Piet Ravlaw�
ie1 PUD i; Subdivision Platy
❑ RZ (8tanc!W Rezone)
SDP (Site Development Pion)
SDPA (Sop Amendment)
6DPI (tnaubsterldal Change to SDP)
SIP (8110 knProven" Plan)
SIM Onsubstarsel Chefrge to alp)
SNR (Stmwf Name Charge)
SNC (Sheet Noma Charge — Unptailpd)
TOR(TMUW of owrdopmerd Righls)
VA (Variance)
VRP (VaBetaticn Removal Permit)
VRSFp (VegeWan Removal & Site fil parmiq
OTHER
DLBCRIPTtON of aurjePrppar or pA ffach roa8 (COPY of *n^ deaanow may be avectred)
FOLIO (Property 10) NVMSER(s) of above (aaaoh fc orafasoc�te 17th logy d ypyon /amore Bran aie)
STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (86 NAMWabls, ffekead
NO site Adrfrws raesignsdJ
• LOODATRIN MAP must be 4lkachad phaMng moot 10" idn of ProjeWetie in relation to naenul Public • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unpletlad proppr tas) feed ljght pfvygy
PROPOSED PRWECT NAME t fe )
NNUMC
PROPOSED STREET NAMES (faAA#o2bt6)
N/A
SITE DE'VMOPMENT PLAN NUMBF -R ((or axlevng prgra only)
SDV or AR >0`
Page 1 of 2
4
4
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
rrao:Davidson Etgirkearing 235 687 5196 39 M49 p, of 266
ADDRESSING CHEMIST- PAGE TWO
PW!sd or devaleMwnt names proposed Far, ar atrWdy appearing irk, condomlNum doaumwft pf spplkmgon: indasta
whether p gznw or e*ba)
P9002e Chalk One: t•{j Chtuidst is m be Faxed back [] Penonetly Pk:ked Up
APPL40w mmpm Michefle AMM, Davidson gWing9ring,
PHONE: 597 -3916 Fluff; 597x985
Signature on Addressing Checklist do" not constitute Project and /or Street Name approval and is
subject to further review by the Addressing Department
FOR STAFF UBE ONLY
Primary Nwnbw ' _;5d Ll l 31y ) _
Adduce dumber�
Address Nuv gw
Addra Numbw
MProved bat z. Ey C0.'
UPdl br
IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED
Page 2 of 2
�t Agenda Item No. 17C
N V' RON • M • L NTMm duly 27, 2010
Page 48 of 266
PUD Rezone & PUD Amendment
1. Provide a map of all, districts and zoning on the subject site and the surrounding
properties. (i.e. CON, ST, PUD, RLSA designation, RFMU district, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-
2.03.08; 4.08.00)
2. Comply with specific requirements per S. SA stewardship easement, or SRA development
document/master plan. (LDC 10.0113; 2.03.06; 4.08.06)
�3 Submit a current aerial photograph and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If
the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay or vegetation inventory identifying
upland, wetland and exotic vegetation. (LDC 10.02.03.B.1.d - e)
Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans.
(LDC 3.05.07.A.2).
/ 5. )Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to
l / be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off-'
site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve
calculations (LDC 3.05.07.B -D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d -e).
Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC
G
3.05.07.H.1.e.
Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC
3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be
interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife
corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.4)
(8� Provide the justification for prop o g a creat&d:Zs3,ie ersus r aming exi g native va etation. (D 3.05.07.H.l.e.i)w ��Tff4siteft ���
9. Provide thL location, maintenance plan, and type of habitat of any proposed
pre! on. (LDC 3.05.07.F)
lJ' Wetland line shall be. approved by SFWMD and delineated on the site plan, Provide
wetland permits from the applicable agencies. (LDC 3.05.07.F; 10.02.03.131.j.)
11. Wetlands within the RFMU District and the Urban Designated Area Lake Trafford/Camp
Keais wetland system shall provide an assessment of the value and function of the onsite
wetlands (WRAP score). Direct impacts of development shall be directed away from high
quality wetlands. (LDC 3.05.07.F.3.a)
12. Wetlands within the RFMU District and the Urban Designated Area Lake Trafford/Camp
Keais wetland system being utilized by listed species, serving as wildlife corridors and
existing wetland flow ways shall be preserved onsite, even if by doing so exceeds the
required preservation acreage. (LDC 3.05.07.F.3.b -c)
13. Wetland preserves within the RFMU District and the Urban Designated Area Lake
Trafford/Camp Keais wetland system shall have a vegetated (existing or planted) upland
buffer located landward from the approved jurisdictional line. (LDC 3.05.07.F.3.f)
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 49 of 266
14. All direct impacts to wetlands within the RFMU District and the Urban Designated Area
Lake Trafford/Camp Keais wetland system shall be mitigated. Provide a mitigation �.
assessment (LDC 3.05.071.4)
15. RLSA Baseline standards for Wetlands outside of FSAs. HSAs, WRAs and the ACSC.
Provide a map identifying the wetland assessment scores of each wetland on -site. The
preservation requirement shall be met first with wetlands with a score of 0.65 or greater
(based on SFWMD methods). Provide agency approved wetland score documentation.
(LDC 4.08.08.H.1.)
16. RLSA Baseline standards for Wetlands outside of FSAs, HSAs, APRAs and the ACSC.
Wetlands being utilized by listed species or serving as wildlife corridors shall be preserved
onsite, even if by doing so exceeds the required preservation acreage. (LDC 4.08.08.H.2.)
17. RLSA Baseline standards for Wetlands outside of FSAs, HSAs, WRAs and the ACSC.
Direct impacts to wetlands, shall be mitigated for. Provide a mitigation assessment. The
wetland functional score of the mitigation must equal or exceed that of the impacted
wetlands. Demonstrate that there's no net loss of wetland functions. Priority shall be given
to mitigation within FSAs and HSAs. (LDC 4.08.08.11.8 -9J
18 Provide a complete and sufficient EIS (and the review fee) identifying author credentials,
consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high
water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used fot farm fields or golf
course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site
contamination. (LDC 10.02.02)
19. Provide a wildlife survey. (LDC 3.04.00) `
20 Provide USFWS and FFWCC agency permits for protected species. (LDC
10.02.03.8. l .j.viii)
0. Include the wildlife; habitat management plan as an appendix to the PUD Document (eagle,
RCW), (LDC 3.04.00)
22. Golf Course PUD within RFMU or RLSA: Provide an Environmental Master Plan and
Natural Resource Management Plan (NRMP) approved by Audubon International. (LDC
2;03.08.A.2.a.(3)(a).xi.b; 2.03.08.A.3.a.(1)(k); 4.08.06.A.3.h; 4.08.08.F.1)
2® PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved.
(LDC 10.02.13.A.2)
24. PUD Document shall identify permitted uses within the preserve and wetland buffers.
(LDC,10.02.13.A.1.e)
25. PUD Document shall provide the following note: "This PUD shall comply with the
guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) and
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission ( FFWCC) regarding potential impacts
to protected species onsite. A Habitat Management Plan for those protected species shall
be submitted to environmental review staff for review and approval prior to final Site Plan/
Construction Plan approval." (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.m)
titGl7(t�r�u 2 UD Document shall provide the following note: "All conservation areas shall be
designated as "Preserve" on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat with .
jW U �L .
f'ou a -L,
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 50 of 266
protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Conservation
casements shall be dedicated on the plat to the project's homeowners association or like `.
entity for ownership and maintenance responsibility and to Collier County with no
[ responsibility for maintenance." (LDC 3.05.07.A.2; LDC 3.05.07.H.1.d; 6.01.02.C.)
$Q. PUD Document shall provide the following note: "All principal structures shall have a
` minimum setback of 25' from the boundary of any preserve. Accessory structures and all
other site alterations shall have a minimum 10 -foot setback," (LDC 3.05.07.H.3;
6.01.02.C.)
Ix PUD Document shall provide the following note: "All Category I invasive exotic plants, as
defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council, nuisance and non -native vegetation, shall
be removed from within preserve areas and subsequent annual removal of these plants (in
perpetuity) shall be the responsibility of the property owner." (LDC 3.05.07.H.1.g.ii)
PUD Document shall provide the following note; "A Preserve Area Management Plan
shall be provided to Environmental Review Staff for review and approval prior to final
plan/construction plan approval identifying methods to address control and treatment of
invasive exotic species, fire management, and maintenance of permitted facilities." (LDC
3.05.07.H.1.g)
. PUD Document shall provide the following note: "All approved Agency permits shall be
submitted prior to final Site Plan/ Construction Plan approval." (LDC 3.05.071;
10.02.03.B.1.j.)
31. Golf Course PUD Document shall provide the following note: "PUD golf course shall be l
designed, constructed and managed in accordance with the Audubon International's Gold
Signature Sanctuary Program."
32. Addition, Comments: Pfot);d2 Q
3�9L+>y -�� (mac ic�bl�ealSi.
33. Stipulations f8r approval:
�a A
!H
HM,
O A
�I 6 �
2
R65 m. y � agog $o 05 Ae
�g
atG� .5s s a is
h 3E r �
�m u
o s y me U� s enda �te N`
: y w �. s¢ x eg "o g u `
nx wl i N; w wY w Ee i''6e Pag E of
w.0 Ga ° a <M m >a � a e
QzQi H� o. a °g�la3o ��g �x �l k p w5 If
mll L.J 6'.dg o2 J°� 0 ¢. " _. y Im "- 0, °.
Z—
W
{ W�
I
{ I z n
Zw�
(S3Sn 031V13tl I W W
HONOHO) IVNOIna avo 1 3S0 ONVl n
I I I Ond OVOb = � m
rl� I 311310000 3bOV ON ONINOZ O SS o
1 1 I I w °vei3s owd u�°tld.c[ /� O `
I
7
.gWF �—� l — 3�� I kter lI l ,l l .
W0
x Hi� l zp.'
:
I
w
I
w
�o i� I j�l Iii q CO a
4 I I Y y I
if
J
w
O 6• z
I / Jai
' I I MJYw353/tl353tld.5Z U
{ r i I ui ode
w °
LU
L) Q I �¢g
w m r�oy
w F I �pw
j { ji g I III '\,1y1 of p • a $
CL
I + (
I I 1N3A30VNVA N3IVM ONV F
I I '1VION3AAOO 03AO8dA1 °350ONV1 Z
Ond SNOAA00 30018 3NId 'ONINOZ
4J
0
0
0
S�
THIS INPTRIgD01T PR&PAM IM
1111en s. Wehet, aspire
giket i galls, LLP
1100 Fifth Avenue South, suite 301
Naples, Florida 34192
(210241 -4613
Without opinion as to Title
Parcel I.D. Num6er:00240200101
Thin Indenture. made
0-4 PARTNERSHIP, a
SPROUL, JULIET A. SF
under Trust created
Article SIXTH C Of
COLLIER, III, Oran
INC., A Florida not 1
Goodlette Road, Na 1
xitnesseth, that the
of TEN DOLLARS ($10.
to Grantors in hand I
acknowledged, have g:
its successors and a
situate, lying and
Florida, to wit:
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 52 of 266
3140494 OR: 3233 PG: 2809 -.
k1COD10 to 01117ICIl6 WIDS Of COL1I11 m1R►, n
03/1111003 at HAW RICK 1. am, cuts
calk 31SO114.01
ne tE 16.50
IGUIR 6.01
DOC -11 26250.00
kite:
kORin 6 110!100
150 ►601 MR OR In 16000
W01 ►L 36101
SpaC=AL xARRRNTY Dawn
of February
benefit
, 2003 between
tip; KATHERINE G.
IAN as Co- Trustees
C. Sproul under
Jr.; and BARRON
METHODIST CHURCH,
an address of 6000
49 antor, for a i deration of the sum
d other g luable consideration
alt Grantee, t �e ipt of which is hereby
anti old to the said Grantee,
(signs a following described land,
being in the County of Collier, State of
See EXHIBIT "All attached hereto and made a part hereof
by reference.
Together with all tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances
thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining.
Subject to zoning and use restrictions imposed by governmental
authority; restrictions and easements common of record.
EXCEPT%EQ AND RZENRVING, EDWZVZR, all oil, gas and mineral rights
below the surface of the land described in the attached EXHIBIT
W
Page I of 9
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 53 of 266
OR: 3233 PG: 2810
This land is not now, nor has it ever been, the homestead property
of any of the Grantors, nor is it contiguous to the homestead of
any of the Grantors.
To Have and to Hold the same in fee simple forever.
And the Grantors hereby covenant with the Grantee that the Grantors
are lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantors
have good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land;
that the grantors hereby warrant the title to the land and will
defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming
by, through or under the Grantors.
In Witness Whereof, grantors have signed and sealed this deed
on February Q?4-11 , 2003.
signed and delivered �rly Ct(j�
in our presences
G� / G -4 PAR HIP, A Florida
al P rt ership
0 1), W
Print Name: MAN I IMIS nc I L+k 1 ere, Partner
Witness lea
Witness
C1
STATE OF
COUNTY OFT t-
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ;Um'
day of February, 2003, by Frances G. Villere, as a Partner of G -4
Partnership, a Florida General partnership, (4-i' who is personally
known to me,or ( ) who produced
as identification.
AdML Os A . Ciket9
I C
991471
NMW MWB.pe« hk T►haioos
AeNk bmdq co. inc.
My commission Expires:
Notary Public iR(.A.RS
Print Name:
Page 2 of 9
(SEAL)
i
A,Z 11.(171de.(.Q17c1
Print Name s W.AN
Witness
rint NajMsz. ,. cHOMAS
Witness
STATE OF .c_
COUNTY OF , I I i e ✓
The foregoing ins
day of February, 200
Partnership, a Flori a
known to me,or ( ) wt
as identification.
My Commission Expires:
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 54 of 266
OR: 3233 PG: 2811 -
By % 6?UVA
Donna.G. Kel er, Partner
1 'te before me this �h
Donna G. Ke as s Partner of G -4
�3�partn�rshi �-S who is personally
Page 3 of 9
ZRISHA A. CIS
'kllr
C
,c.<y X- ,1t •&dn
Print Name:— www-ANDMIDN
Witness
(PAnt Name : CAarJRaRSHOAAA$
Witness
STATE OF �OyidG�-
COUNTY OF (Miler
The foregoing ins
day of February, 2003
Partnership, a Florid
known to me, or ( ) ydh
as identification.
1021L 1YLhA eL
My Commission Expires
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 55 of 266
OR: 3233 PG: 2812 ---
.
dged before me this
is as a Partner of G -4
irtnersh who is personally
Pr
Page 4 of 9
Print Name: WUL W.
Witness
Print Nam%Awop4 _
Witness
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
The foregoini
day of February,
Partnership, a F1
known to me,or (,
as identification
hL
My Commission Expires:
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 56 of 266
OR; 3233 PG; 2813
Ely : OIAA —�, 6.
Lamar Gable, /Partner
a ow d\ d before me this , t h
mar Gabl , s a Partner of G -4
who is personally
Nota is TFUSM A. AKM3
l
Page 5 of 9 1
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 57 of 266
OR: 3233 PG: 2814
Print,Name: gg" Barron Co ier,
Witness
l P int NartXg,iDpp P. THOMAS
itneas
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
The foregoing n ac wled a before me this 2101
day of February, 20 �a a IIZ, ( w< who is
personally kno 0 m ( ) who produced
i r ation.
Amahk T41ha A. Ate.
(i�ImY�Im1CC991471
s4rnTMgan 01 Notary, l C �SM A. �S 6L I
My Commission Expires:
Page 6 of 9
Signed and delivered
in our presences
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 58 of 266
OR: 3233 PG: 2815
JULIET A. SPROUL, JENNIFER S.
SULLIVAN, and KATHERINE G. SPROUL,
as Trustees Under the Trust created
for JULIET C. SPROUL under Article
SIXTH C of the will of Barron
Collier, Jr.,deceased, (Probated in
Collier County, Florida, Circuit
Court,Probate Division, Case No.
STATE OF +nC.YCL
COUNTY OF P✓�
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,4 3 VYN
day of February, 2003, by Juliet A. Sproul, as Trustee under the
trust created for Juliet C. Sproul, deceased, (Probated in Collier
County, Florida, Circuit Court, Probate Division, Case No. 76 -33),
( ✓ ) who is personally known to me,or ( ) who produced
AbW
Alffilk C=%CC!l M
I& 1%1=
M4W Dow MMS IN" 0, W,
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
Print Name•_ _
Page 7 of 9
TFd%% a AVM
(SEAL)
kIIr
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 59 of 266
OR: 3233 PG: 2816 _.
Print Name: W,ANpERAnu T*nnii4r S. Sullivan, Trustee
Witness
Print Name V
Witness
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
The foregoing �na�£ was- ar��iowle ige� before me this
day of February, 2 03, J er S Sul i n, as Trustee under
the trust created f t u e eased, (Probated in
Collier County, F1 i a r t, ro Division, Case No.
76 -33), who on r ( ) who produced
�1 id n i cation.
Alen -
l�lw hk/Mi 47 rOj —DSO is
rra "ft d. hL \j�E lire ame : 'IFUSMA A. AKERS
My Commission Expires:
Page 8 of 9
(SEAS,)
Print Name: GAIL W.ANO6tSON
Witness
jpint Name:
Witness
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
The foregoing
day of February, 2
trust created for
County, Florida, C
( ►/) who is pe
Alg3k TtW* A. AM
Ev" I O
�
IMW tm.bL
My Commission Expires:
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 60 of 266
OR: 3233 PG: 2817 - 4
BY; "
therine G. Sp ul, Trustee
1(j
ed before me this
G. S u %Pr s Trustee under the
ea obat ed in Collier
)a Di n, Case No 76 -33),
p who produced
M& i i '
dation.
Notary Yid TFU" A AKERS
(SEAL)
Page 9 of 9
r
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 61 of 266
%k OR: 3233 PG: 2818 *tL-
EXHIBIT, "A"
All that part of section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East,
Collier. County, Florida, being more particularly described as
follows: Coamaacing at the southerly 1/4 corner of Section 10,
Township 49 South, Range 25 Sant, Collier County, Florida,
thence along north -south 114 section line of said Section lo,
North 01 018.350 West 69.79 feet to a point on the northerly
right -of -way of Pine Ridge Road (S.R. 896); thence along said
boundary, South 89007152" West 9.57 feet to a point of curvature
an the easterly right of way of Frank Boulevard, 100 foot
right -of -way an recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 58 of the Public
Records of Collier county, Florida; thence along said
right -of -way 454.08 f are' . off l of a circular curve
coacave the east, tl� 5679.65 feet, through a
central angle of In and be tended by a chord which
bears North 04 04 ' East 453.96 f t; thence continuing
along said righ -o - 06'1 " ant 1102.02 feet, and
the Point of B 9 pa e1 h r a described; thence
continuing Alo g 7 006'13" East 782,59
feet; thence 1 av n h - No th 89 "29157■ East
676.40 feet to oun Of the parcel of land
described in o a 2 ; co along said boundary
South 00 046124" t 775.71 fen I t es leaving said boundary
South 890291570 783.65 fee at oil the easterly
right -of -way lin aid Frank bo d and the Point of
Beginning of the p ersin ed.
-1 E Cl -
;� 4
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 62 of 266
EXHIBIT G
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION
Board of Trustees
John Sampson, Chairman
Don Barber, Vice - Chairman
Elizabeth Krier, Secretary- Treasurer
Not for profit, no stock issued
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 1/22/07
C
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 63 of 266
AFFIDAVIT
W P/11 L`01WEA ! - being first duly sworn, depose and say that weo
am he owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed
hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest
information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and glade a part of this
application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We l-i derstand that the
information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this
form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be
advertised until this application is deemed complete, and ail required information has been submitted.
As pro erty owner W�urther authorize Tim Hancock. AICP. David on naineering Inc. to act as
our. n�epresentative in any matters regarding this Petition.
ISignature of Property Owner
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
(411)�
Sig Nature of Property Owner
VA ,.-o R- • % az"tll_
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
U k @.— C`I WT l R P-1 ho 'POAU O: 7-4,L 15
Nba^ -u tJbQ s. Uv-,)Vr 2 Mpn-tooisrG"kk
The foregoing instrument "(as ac�"owledged before me this � day of
200__3_, by �2n�o Qd tYfa ibvn who is personallynown to me or has produ d
as Identification.
State of Florida
County of Collier
_:: "'% Trudi Valdivia
Commission # DDS74895
=;o 17y6 Expires July 17, 2010
f ii•`� 6aae TM Fmn mwnrce. mF 10
Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone U22/07
(Signature of Notary Public - State of
Florida)
(Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 64 of 266
COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL
The undersigned do hereby sweaz ar em that we are the fee sitaple titleholders and owners of record of property
commonly ]mown as d lnErW 15 Lf` l JU i t Ei0 Jit Ci•tt rJUISTC"e4, 4 t ( t -6.
o ZyCnz V7L. 34.1 a9
(Street address and City, State and Zip e)
and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto.
The property described herein is the subject of an application for 000A in -10
planned unit development CPUD) zoning. We hereby designate t7r,.n - -,,. ,o . &02&4& . legal
representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally
bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but
is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and
studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site, Tbese representatives will remain the only entity to authorize
development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to
Collier County.
The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of
development of the project:
1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions
placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit
development rezoning.
2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and
stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in
part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County.
3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or
safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development
Code.
4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and
restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within
the planned unit development most be consistent with those terns and conditions.
5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terns,
safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel
compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit
development and the County may stop ongoing construction 'vity until project is brought into compliance
with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the phoned unit d vel L
Owner Owner
2. �. UIC-4- 66PS1 cM43�
Printed Name printed Name
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
Swore to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this LO day of
Kb e _ who is personalb
as identification. A
Trudi Valdivia
�^ �yExpires July 1D7, 201095
i., ,,B.Qd7MF.n -M- -rc MF BOM417010
Application For Public Hearing For Pt7D Remne 01/18107
200(�lby
.kys�e or Itas produced
or
(Serial Number, if any)
C
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
F,- os:Davidson Enginewing 12394346084 041171ZMB 09:94 am P.0011003 f 266
_.� COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT �.
ADDRESSING DEPARTMENT 1900 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
Pleasealn 0" Oft the foltowing and fax to the Addrosaing DapwbnaM at 23&mg.9724 or submit h
B epaftent at the above address. parson to era
Form moat ha signed try Addresging personnel prbr fa pre applfoaation meeting. Not all I a apply to wary project.
Items in bold iype.era requhed. Fanne older titan 9 monrha will mqulre addidonaf raylow and approval by the AdR{rsesmg
OePerbttent.
PETITION TYPE (ohadr powon yjae below, cavaplele 4 aaparata Adabseehrg Che mAV for each PeMn Type)
8t. (Slanting Permit)
9D (Goat Doric Eftnelon)
CamlvapCims Permit
CU (Conditional Use)
Q EXP (Excavation Permit)
FP (mvi Plat
U-A Not Una Adju*nent)
❑ PNC (Prged Name Charge)
0 PA (Plana & Plat Rw11W
® Pu (Preliminary SubdMalon Plat)
El R2 (Still-Wand Rezone)
SDP (Sxa Davelopmem Plan)
SDPA (SDP Amerldment)
❑ SOPI Onsub ardW Change to GDP)
SIP (Site lrnpmv=$M Plan)
SIR (IrmubatarraW Change to SIP)
SNR (Street Name Change)
SNC (Street Name Change - U
TOR (Transfer o Developmard Rim)
VA (Varier")
VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit)
VRSPP
OTHER (Vegetation Rem owl &Stte FillP&mi*
LEGAL DESCRIP 10N of eubjoot property or propeNae (copy affengMy descrip*n may be attached
Parwl 24 of 10 .49 _ 29 )
002 IMO (pWpeKY ID) NUMSE3R(a) or above (attach m, r aasoclete with, /spat desr r"m $more then ane)
STREET ADDRESS orADORESSFa (as appltaeW ifasaedy aLgrwp)
na SO address
• LOCATION MAP Must be altwhed dvMng axml bcetlon off prciad/s9e In relation to ne2reat public mad riytd oP vexy
• SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted propwfles)
PROP68ED PROJECT NAME (Meplolloahle)
North Naples Unked Methodist Church Re=.
PROPOSED STREET NAMES (+Tappk=&a)
SITE DEVELOPMEW PLAN NUMBER (for exieft =ffioWallss only)
SDP - or AR k
Fromkvidson Engineering 1233430084 04/17/2008 08:54
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Pw 66 of 266 am
ADDRESSING CHECXUST - PAGE TWO Page T of 2
P�or development nomes proposed for, or already appearing kL oondominium documents (e application; Indicate
proposed or sadeeng)
Please Check One: Cheddiat Is tU be Foxed beds ❑ Personally Picked Up
APPLICANT NAME: Midmlle Temayo
PHONE (238) 43q.60M FAX (239) 434-6M 4
Signature on Addressing Checidist does not coned " project and /or Sheet Name approval and is
subject to further review by the Addreseing Department.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
IPr1rnWY Number. 3Lkt1 4 1
Addrasi Number
Address Numbor _
Addrsse Number
ApProvad by: l�.dX Q.wr Data:
C)4_ I 16
Updaed by Dah
IF OLDER THAN a MONTHS, FORM FAUST BE
UPDA'T'ED OR NEW FORM SUBAAI rmD
Page 2 of 2
G:10—n6ApphMM FMft%Add =W9p Chvr)CW rev 02OW7.0100
C
it
c
LEGEND
r �A.` ��.. �,.. _ ..ptm �C,.�'ra I: 3z JJ44�S�i•`-s ^1-e ;1 p�'x�1,Y Y _:!4'.�". +a
v
A }I'C T ` `�' " . �'�' ♦' � �1' � i �qJ %+ +. Y k� ®� �,�ihq�.J' � A R
NNUMC SITE
.t, COLL JER COUNTY MAINTAINED ROADS
.3 ► a L
ISM
�• f? 1.. .. � 4 41 W
�� ... ' W �1 vq F# Mme• �• 1 #P . i�
k'' i'+ SJ k e M s s P•. .tW E _ no: ..f�++ �i. K 1 x 1
tsdt -1k
ITk 41—
A
•. t x � ` 961 � � JAl - .nwr� +.{�y�" ��
1 y( 4 J { 4
`w 01
ggq�4 ^' .. r G ��MMA'I�w p ��i �!/ •• {y+� �y?...�Y `.Y4� -i
R ` Ey'}� t YR • Y � J * � w
..lam � 1 •R r` 6 Y4.. �.+' m~y0 a • f
;.,'• =i �' P9' „ �' C c'�1 ty u4 jt�wHu t' h,: ,ty.. • . -.
gv
Ira
MMM
y, i J^ lam• k. 04 Y, W" •. •+ ,�. • wrir4 ,� ON Vw• T�r*i► %e
• W n e• 4 ,4 Y W l
� � rP ��tl{:+n1" 1 '�!}Tom'^' J.', ni4 • �a uUf q 1 ,
P .A
4 !: d.e Y9CPe W • eeo ,,,. Fby+ f ..t ° �' �,, Y-.
• yy��•.y�_ yy[ ./��a n "e x.. wi- 9 ¢j, �� I i:F ..` _ tt '�: pt:' ")a e� p 5 � '
'Ix � _ G ,'.� "ti y,.WY`.s y .W. � -...� a 4 . � C'• p a /JF"i 1. a"i y Y MPi Y �Y
r• � r v
•"��.' is !"C�RIr' -ilii. ... ..,. -..'I,.Ra•!T1%+P.6:., ... .: ^a 64e -+,y'1 .. - �' _{� ,-
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 68 of 266
Qu, �p
UTTILITIES
TELEPHONE (239) 213 -4712 • FACSIMILE (239) 213 -4799
380 f2mERSIDE CIRCLE • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 -6796
January 27, 2010
Mr. Frederick E. Hood, A1CP
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301
Naples, Florida 34105
Subject: North Naples United Methodist Church Landscape /Parking Plan
City Easement
1 have received the preliminary landscapeiparking plan for the North Naples United
Methodist Church located on Goodlette /Frank Road. This project will be subject to the
approval of an SDP /DO application showing location of the City's 16" raw water main,
parking and plantings, with appropriate protection of the City's services, the City of
Naples will permit landscaping and or development related parking inside the referenced
20' easement upon review and approval of said development plans.
Please contact me at my office if you have questions.
Sincerely,
A�,1 . ,/ -111 ✓-1 e-
Robert Middleton
Utilities Director
Cc: George Archibald
C
A
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 69 of 266
161140110 3EW ► • 1
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004 -41, AS AMENDED,
THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE
APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE
HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN
AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED USE
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING
DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE
NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT MPUD, TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT
OF A MAXIMUM 1,900 SEAT CHURCH AND CHURCH
RELATED FACILITIES, A MAXIMUM 1,900 SEAT CIVIC
AND CULTURAL FACILITIES, A MAXIMUM 200 STUDENT
SCHOOL AND A MAXIMUM 209 UNIT ADULT ASSISTED
LIVING FACILITY IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,
RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CONSISTING OF 13.0 + /- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Tim Hancock of Davidson Engineering and Richard D. Yovanovich,
Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., representing The North Naples United
Methodist Church, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning
classification of the herein described real property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 10,
Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from an Agricultural
Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the
13.0 + /- acre project to be known as The North Naples United Methodist Church MPUD, to allow
development of a maximum 1,900 seat church and church related facilities, a maximum 1,900
seat civic and cultural facilities, a maximum 200 student school and a maximum 209 unit adult
PUDZ - 2008 -AR -13375
Rev. 6/21/10 Page I oft
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 70 of 266
assisted living facility in accordance with The North Naples United Methodist Church MPUD
Document, attached hereto as Exhibits `A" through "G" and incorporated by reference herein.
The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004 -41, as
amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is /are hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION TWO:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super- majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
, Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
Steven T. Williams h(J o
Assistant County Attorney Do
day of 2010.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
Attachments: Exhibit A — Permitted Uses
Exhibit B — Development Standards
Exhibit C — Master Plan
Exhibit D — Legal Description
Exhibit E — List of Requested Deviations from LDC
Exhibit F — Development Commitments
Exhibit G - Survey
CP \08 -CPS- 00909 \42
PUDZ - 2008 -AR -133 75
Rev. 6/21/10 Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 71 of 266
EXHIBIT A
PERMITTED USES:
The North Naples United Methodist Church Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD)
shall be developed as a mixed use project which may include a mix of limited community facility
uses, including but not limited to a religious facility and associated uses, a kindergarten through
12`h grade school, assisted living facilities (ALF), continuing care retirement communities
(CCRC) and independent living units for age 55 plus and senior housing.
The maximum size for the continuing care retirement communities (CCRC), assisted living
facilities (ALF) and independent living units for age 55 plus and similar facilities shall not
exceed a floor to area ratio (FAR) of .60 with a maximum of 209 independent units in
accordance with the operational characteristics contained herein.
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole
or in part, for other than the following:
Tract A: Community Facility/Residential (CF/R)
A. Princinal Uses
1. Child Care Centers (Group 8351)
2. Churches & Places of Worship, not to exceed 1,900 seats (Group 8661)
3. Civic & Cultural Facilities such as amphitheatres, structures for theatrical, symphonic,
orchestral and or operatic productions (limited to 1,900 seats), youth associations (i.e.
YMCA/YWCA), fraternal /veterans lodges or associations, museums.
4. Community Garden (Group 0161)
5. Elementary and Secondary Schools, limited to 200 additional students in conjunction
with the existing schools on the main church parcel adjacent to the north (Group 8211)
6. Individual and Family Social Services (Group 8322) limited to the following:
(a) Activity Centers, elderly or handicapped
(b) Centers for senior citizens
(c) Community centers
(d) Day care centers, adult and handicapped
(e) Senior citizens associations
(f) Youth centers
Play Areas, Playgrounds and Recreational Facilities in association with Church/School
Uses.
North Naples United MethoCiir;tChurch MPUD
Revised: pine "17, 2010 Page t of 11
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 72 of 266
8. Assisted Living Facilities (ALF), continuing care retirement communities (CCRC),
and independent living units for age 55 plus. All uses shall be permitted at a combined
maximum F.A.R. of 0.60. Nursing and Personal Care Facilities (Groups 8051, 8052)
consistent with operational characteristics stated on page 4 of this document.
9. Public Safety Service Facilities
10. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of
permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (`BZA ") by
the process outlined in the LDC.
B. Accessory Uses
Accessory use(s) located on Tract A may serve principal land uses on Tract A, or may serve
as accessory uses to the same principal land use(s) as allowed on Tract A when those same
principal use(s) are located on the abutting property to the north so long as both Tract A, or
the applicable portion thereof, and the abutting property to the north are unified by a Site
Development Plan.
1. Administrative Offices and Educational Facilities.
2. Ancillary Facilities, limited to power, HVAC and mechanical functions to serve
permitted uses.
3. Church operated Thrift Store (Group 5932) not for profit only.
4. Columbarium, at grade level or above ground internment only (Group 6553)
5. Individual and Family Social Services (Group 8322)
(a) Counseling centers
(b) Family counseling services
(c) Marriage counseling service
(d) Old age assistance
(e) Outreach programs
(f) Relief services, temporary
(g) Service leagues
(h) Temporary emergency shelters (limited legal occupancy under the fire code)
6. Employee /Staff Housing, limited to church staff only. Maximum of 2 units.
7. Personal services, dining, private restaurant/lounge, skilled nursing and other uses
incidental to ALF and CCRC uses.
8. Project sales and administrative offices which may occur in a residential or
recreational building and or in a temporary building until such time as permanent
North Njples United Methodist Church MPOD
Revised June 17, 2010 Page 2 of I I
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 73 of 266
structures are available. All such facilities will be permitted in compliance with
Section 5.04.03 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC).
9. Retail sale of fresh, agricultural products, shall be limited to weekends and subject to a
review of traffic circulation, parking, and safety concerns pursuant to the submission
of a site improvement plan as provided for in section 10.02,03. (Group 5431;
Vegetable markets and stands only)
10. Water Management Facilities /Lakes.
11. Customary accessory uses and structures including, but not limited to, signs, gate
houses, private garages, tennis facilities, clubhouse, indoor and outdoor recreational
facilities and swimming pools with or without screened enclosures, unlit playfields,
playgrounds and similar facilities.
12. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted
accessory uses and is deemed consistent with the GMP, as determined by the Board of
Zoning Appeals (BZA) through the process outlined in the LDC.
North Naples United Mcth(icflstChurch MP(7D
Revised: June 17, 2010 Page 3 of 11
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 74 of 266
C. Operational Characteristics for Independent Living Units for Persons Over Age 55•
The developer of independent living units, its successors or assigns, shall provide the
following services and /or be subject to the following operational standards:
1. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older.
2. Total number of independent units shall be limited to 209.
3. There shall be on -site dining for the residents.
4. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes of
grocery and other types of shopping, Individual transportation services shall be
coordinated for the residents' individualized needs including but not limited to medical
office visits.
5. 'There shall be an on -site manager /activities coordinator to assist residents with their
individual needs. The manager /coordinator shall also be responsible for arranging trips
to off -site events as well as planning for lectures, movies, music and other
entertainment for the residents at the on -site clubhouse.
6. A wellness center shall be provided on -site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall
be provided for the residents.
7. Each unit shall be equipped to notify emergency service providers in the event of a
medical or other emergency.
8. Each unit shall be designed so that a resident is able to age -in- place. For examples,
kitchens may be easily retrofitted to lower the sink to accommodate a wheelchair
bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted to add grab bars.
North Naples United Mcthodist Chu, ch t1PUD
Revised: June 17, 2010 Pagc 4 of'11
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 75 of 266
Tract B: Preserve
A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures in the Preserve (provided the minimum required
Preserve acreage is retained):
1. Passive recreational areas including recreational shelters.
2. Biking, hiking and nature trails, and boardwalks.
3. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries.
4. Water Management Facilities.
5. Any other use deemed consistent with the LDC for permitted uses in preserves or
deemed compatible by the BZA at time of Development Order approval.
Nurth Naples United Methodist Church MPUD
Revised: June 17, 2010 Page S of 11
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 76 of 266
EXHIBIT B
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the proposed Mixed -Use
PUD (MPUD). Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified
in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision
plat. Any use that is developed as accessory to a permitted use within the 300 acre Goodlette
Road PUD shall be subject to development standards as identified below for principal uses.
TABLE
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS
Requirements
Principal Use
Accessory Use
Minimum Lot Area
10,000 square feet
N/A
Minimum Lot Width
75 feet
N/A
Maximum Height
• Zoned:
50 feet and 4 stories
35' and 2 stories
• Actual:
57 feet/75 feet and 4 stories
42' and 2 stories
Minimum Floor Area
1,000 square feet
Maximum Floor Area Ratio
0.604
Minimum Building Setbacks
• Front Yard ( Goodlette-
Frank Road)
120 feet=
120 feet=
• Front Yard (north
perimeter boundary of the
PUD)
25 feet
25 feet
• Side Mardi
'4 of the SBH (but no less than 15 feet)
10 feet
• Minimum Distance
Between Structures
15 feet
10 feet
• Internal Drives
15 feet from the edge of pavement
10 feet
• Lake'
20 feet
20 feet
• Preserve
25 feet
10 feet
SBH = Sum of Building Heights
1 — Side yards for principal structures on lots which abut a lake; the setback from the lake for
all principal and accessory uses may be 0' providing architectural bank treatment is
incorporated into design and subject to written approval from Project Plan Review.
2 — Actual height for a permitted church steeple only shall be 75 feet.
No th Naples United Muthodist Church MPUD
Revised tune 17 , 2010 Pnge 6 of 11
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 77 of 266
3 — Lake setbacks are measured from the control elevation established for the lake.
4 — Limited to the ALF use, excluding parking areas under buildings.
5 — Measured from the property line.
North Naples United Met hodlSt Chu rCll NIP t1D
Revised, June 17, 2010 Page 7 of 11
ryQQN� �p
O. �pM $�alns
CZCZCZ eYefl°.!
N � rsjg
P� W G� 3ii
~ ii• S
a� a
EXHIBIT C:
MASTER PLAN
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 78 of 266
I�I$z.,etaei {ill i 9� �II446 g� xi §[a€ 1,
a'�� gq sI�
p 3 I FF IgpSI � B BBFf�y� g� GG �yY
6j� EI
L F 4
(5350
uusNI 350 OW
I OVOU
OVOOC OMNUZ 1
AI 'nsus .wv utwl s[J /� f'1
—__
i I; 1 J
9pl I��� ✓�11�t� ! � ��! I e�ffi��Y
4 r �' 8 1 � I.�c• � ow
s 6 ade U
I
I ail Alai; wu
w m
W N Iti
1N3W393MO MAO ONtl
aneVSNawwoo gWl� 3Nb 36N NOZ
ll! N! !I
W U
YA
5„
bg
I—
F—
r—ll�
iT •
I
fII�
I'
'llI
�I•
I'
I
I,
I! .
� I
P
I
I'
I
P•
I�I
P;
I
Ii
d4
Za
�s-
4
aGS
eYE
w
O�
Cf
Z�
Z9
re
W9 }S
W_Y
z�
K
0
g
North Naples United Methodist Church MPUD
Revised: june 17, 2010 Page 8 of t]
✓
I
I!
�
I I
(5350
uusNI 350 OW
I OVOU
OVOOC OMNUZ 1
AI 'nsus .wv utwl s[J /� f'1
—__
i I; 1 J
9pl I��� ✓�11�t� ! � ��! I e�ffi��Y
4 r �' 8 1 � I.�c• � ow
s 6 ade U
I
I ail Alai; wu
w m
W N Iti
1N3W393MO MAO ONtl
aneVSNawwoo gWl� 3Nb 36N NOZ
ll! N! !I
W U
YA
5„
bg
I—
F—
r—ll�
iT •
I
fII�
I'
'llI
�I•
I'
I
I,
I! .
� I
P
I
I'
I
P•
I�I
P;
I
Ii
d4
Za
�s-
4
aGS
eYE
w
O�
Cf
Z�
Z9
re
W9 }S
W_Y
z�
K
0
g
North Naples United Methodist Church MPUD
Revised: june 17, 2010 Page 8 of t]
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 79 of 266
EXHIBIT D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHERLY 'A CORNER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,
RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG NORTH -SOUTH % SECTION
LINE OF SAID SECTION 10, NORTH 01 °18'35" NEST 69.79 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY OF PINE RIDGE ROAD (S.R. 896); THENCE ALONG SAID
BOUNDARY, SOUTH 89 °07'52" WEST 9.57 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE ON THE
EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF FRANK BOULEVARD, 100 FOOT RIGHT -OF -WAY AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 58 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY 454,08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A
CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE THE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5679.65 FEET, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04034'51" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS
NORTH 04 048'48" EAST 453.96 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF
THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY
NORTH 07006'13" EAST 1102.02 FEET, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL
HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY NORTH 07 106'13"
EAST 782.59 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY NORTH 89 029'57" EAST 676.40
FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.
BOOK 503, PAGE 206; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY SOUTH 00 °46'24" EAST 775.71
FEET, THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY SOUTH 89 °29'57" WEST 783.65 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF SAID FRANK BOULEVARD AND THE POINT
OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED.
North NaPles United Methodist Church MPlll)
Revised, Julio 17, 2010 Page 9 of 11
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 80 of 266
EXHIBIT E
LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC:
Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02(C)4, Buffer Yard Requirements, which
requires an Alternative D Landscape Buffer to allow no landscape buffer along the entry
drive providing access from Goodlette -Frank Road. If the property, or portions of the
property, are developed as non - church related uses, the developer shall refer to the landscape
buffering requirements outlined in the LDC at the time of site development.
2. A deviation from LDC Section 4.05.04.G which states that multi - family clubhouse structures
require parking spaces at a ratio of 1 parking space per 200 square feet and swimming pools
require parking spaces at 1 per 75 square feet for the first 1,000 square feet and 1 for each
additional 125 square feet of water areas, in order to provide parking for a clubhouse and
outdoor pool associated with an ALF at a ratio of 1 parking space per 800 square feet, or
25% of the required clubhouse parking standard.
North Naples UnitF,d Metho(I ist Church M PUP)
Revised; June 172 20 7 0 f age 10 of 11
EXHIBIT F
DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS:
ENVIRONMENTAL
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 81 of 266
1. Preserve Area Calculation; 7.93 acres (existing vegetation) x 15% = 1.19 acres to be
preserved.
2. Native plantings in all three strata shall be required to be added to the preserve areas
where there is removal of non - native and/or nuisance vegetation. A planting plan shall be
submitted at the time of application for plat or site plan approval immediately following
the approval of the rezone.
TRANSPORTATION
1. Access to this parcel shall be limited to the shared access with the existing North Naples
United Methodist Church (parcel no. 00240280208). No direct access to Goodlette Frank
Road is allowed. A perpetual cross - access easement most be granted from the parcel to
the north (currently under the same ownership) to provide access to this PUD.
2. Day care students may not exceed a total of 50 enrolled students at any time.
3. The maximum trip generation allowed by any combination of the proposed uses (both
primary and ancillary) may not exceed 128 PM Peak Hour, two way trips; as analyzed by
the traffic study associated with this project.
4. For services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, as determined
by Collier County Staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law
enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier
County staff, with staffing and locations(s) as directed by the County Manager or his
designee.
North Naples United NiethodistChUIVII MPUD
Revised: June 17, 2010 Page 11 of 1 1
y k
➢@ ➢sl@ a g op @ @ @ @:
�� � yax �Y i � °� ➢ 3 r ;a a dp Qa�^ ;Y9,- @
e= ayp p e. Y is t y [x`.g n rqe* 3•Y!'v
� ;
Y� E §`C 53 'I� a pF psS %I °77x §KhB3�Yge����YO�xF @ ➢py9
Khq
ei, enJY
aye f Y y,J Ya i &v . @pe:cs3p'?e7z�::
f
Ifid_Y'a
i
�� �• Jy � �j y6
� I� 4� �� I �4➢
a
If
i
I G ir�rh II i Q� 8
Ip � I '•��..Ir ln� R � � bz ¢T
s j;: r3i � e ➢➢
e
@ ➢9
I
o � Iii i
r„ — --
I IJ- I
I 770
AB
yep �
Wu
g2
�4
Xj-
L
X
W
gga
3 a ® g
� _ 5
N
a Irt A '.0 = , �",�� @R
U y F V 7 T 7�� o 4 g u
alte M
w w C V
y I� rc Sol x " = Uw, Jul
g w a, aq w o�� l �� ..a- z' s=a 16 PageJS of2
Z Ztl o w �,�o g =g t'4?LL.� O &��£ �a Z$
w dt "g wl °a�s'� " O' sK3E;
�
Z9
zo
I LU
za-
! t7'RI
€ Z.<
(s3sn aaivi3a v W �S °
HOHn HO) 7VNOI1n1IiSN1 :3Sa ONVI Z e
and OVO6 p °u °e
3ll310000 3NOV 00E :ONINOZ
I ❑ I NOV913s OHV� iNDad sL
i
I
z = I vi I I —/ I�
zjj
� u,� ✓�� I s it ��� 1 �° - m I r �"
O LU I.
¢w o.° iiI Iltil; I 1 ky'," Q Q O
- 1
w - Q
U W ) �-i I K�
W I F w
gal <s �
F �' 4 I � L, <O
R" U' U v
Z F y
ID
zz I a J I
Hs
w
NDV91353�tl353tld 5L
LLI
I • I 1 _ ! � L• ~ u
y �
W a ~ I ova
Y Q
Y'• W m Q =o
CO
F °o
uj
t
GN3W30VNVW NaiVM AO0NV
^ 1VI NOAAO O0ON3NId 3S0 NOZ O
and SNOWWOO 3O0R13NId '9NINOZ
rl
I.
II.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 84 of 266
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF MAY 5.2010
NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT
Petition No.: PUDZ- 2008 -AR -13375
Petition Name: North Naples United Methodist Church
ApplicantlDeveloper: North Naples United Methodist Church (NNUMC)
Engineering Consultant: Davidson Engineering, Inc.
Environmental Consultant: Davidson Engineering, Inc.
LOCATION
The subject property is located on the east side of Goodlette -Frank Road, ±1500
feet north of Pine Ridge Road, in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East,
Collier County, Florida.
III. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
The proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) is bordered by the existing North
Naples United Methodist Church in the 300 .Acre Goodlette Road PUD to the
north, retail and commercial development in Pine Ridge Commons PUD to the
south, Pine Ridge Middle School in a Rural Agricultural zoning designation to the
east, and single family homes in a Rural Agricultural zoning designation to the
West.
ZONING
N - 300 -Acre Goodlette Road PUD (Planned
Unit Development)
S_ Pine Ridge Commons PUD
E - Rural Agricultural (A)
W - Rural Agricultural (A)
DESCRIPTION
Church and School on
19taere tract, then
Residential uses
Retail and Commer-
cial land uses
Pine Ridge Middle
School
Single Family Homes
Item V
EAC Meeting
Page 2 of 9
IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 85 of 266
The North Naples United Methodist Church MPUD is a proposed 13.0± acre
mixed -use development which may include a mix of community facility uses,
including but not limited to a religious facility and associated uses, a kindergarten
through 12th grade school, assisted living facilities (ALF), continuing care
retirement communities, (CCRC) and independent living units for age 55 plus and
senior housing.
The MPUD Master Plan depicts the location of a 7.69± acre development tract
and a 3.15 ± acre preserve and lake tract which includes 1.19± acre of preserve
area.
V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY
A. Future Land Use Element:
The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban — Urban
Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as identified on the
countywide Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). This
designation is intended for residential use and to accommodate a variety of non-
residential uses, including community facilities such as churches, group housing
uses, cemeteries, and schools.
Commercial uses are allowed as accessory to other permitted uses so long as
restrictions and limitations are imposed to insure the commercial use functions as
an accessory, subordinate use.
Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 states: "New developments shall be
compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses as set forth in
the Land Development Code." It is the responsibility of the Zoning and Land
Development Review staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety to
perform the compatibility analysis.
The Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed rezone consistent with the
FLUE.
B. Conservation & Coastal Management Element
Policy ZZ2
In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of stormwater run -off
stormwater systems should be designed in such a way that discharged water does
not degrade receiving waters and an attempt is made to enhance the timing,
quantity and quality of ,fresh water to the estuarine system. Non - structural
methods such as discharge and storage in wetlands are encouraged.
EAC Meeting
Page 3 of 9
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 86 of 266
The stormwater management system for the NNUMC property has been designed
according to SFWMD rules and criteria.
Policy 2.2.3
Chemical spraying for aquatic weed control should be conducted with extreme
caution. The use of appropriate biological and mechanical (use of harvesting
equipment to remove vegetation) controls in both the canal system and
stormwater detention ponds is encouraged Manufacturers and EPA
guidelines for chemical use in aquatic habitat will be followed.
Any aquatic areas (lakes) created in conjunction with this project will be subject
to and will adhere to this policy.
GOAL 6: THE COUNTYSHALL IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVEAND
APPROPRL4 TELY USE ITS .NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND
WILDLIFE HABITAT.
OBJECTIVE 6.1
The County shall protect native vegetative communities through the application
of minimum preservation requirements. The following policies provide
criteria to make this objective measurable. These policies shall apply to all
of Collier County except for that portion of the County which is identified on
the Countywide Facture Land Use A7ap (FLUM) as the Rural Lands Stewardship
Area Overlay.
Policy 6. 1.1
For the County's Urban Designated Area... native vegetation shall be preserved
on -site through the application of the following preservation and vegetation
retention standards and criteria...
The NNUMC MPUD is a mixed use project with Commercial and Community
Facility uses in the Urban Designated Area and therefore under current code is
subject to providing 15% native vegetation. This site has 7.96 acres existing
native vegetation; 15% is 1.19 acres required and to be preserved.
Policy 6.1.4:
Prohibited invasive exotic vegetation shall be removed from all new
The NNUMC property does contain exotic and nuisance vegetation. Melaleuca,
Brazilian pepper, lygodimn, and earleaf acacia are the species with the greatest
presence. Exotic densities vary throughout the site, but are extremely dense in the
southwest corner of the property. All exotics will be removed from the site
EAC Meeting
Page 4 of 9
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 87 of 266
according to the included Preserve Management Plan (PMP), Exhibit 5 of the EIS.
The site will be maintained free of exotic and nuisance vegetation in perpetuity.
Policy 6.1.7:
The County shall require native vegetation to be incorporated into landscape
designs in order to promote the preservation of native plant communities and
to encourage water conservation.
"The NNUMC project will utilize native vegetation species throughout project
landscaping, littoral zones, and perimeter buffers as required by current County
code" (p. 14 of EIS).
Policy 6.1.9.
An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), or submittal of appropriate
environmental data as specified in the County's land development regulations, is
required...
This requirement has been satisfied.
OBJECTIVE 6.2:
The County shall protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of
wetlands pursuant to the appropriate policies under Goal 6. The following
policies provide criteria to make this objective measurable. The County's
wetland protection policies and strategies shall be coordinated with the
Watershed Management Plans as required by Objective 2.1 of this Element.
Policy 6.2.1:
As required by Florida Administrative Code 9Z- 5.006(1)(b), wetlands identified
by the 1994 -95 SFWMD land use and land cover inventory are mapped on the
Future Land Use Map series. These areas shall be verified by jurisdictional field
delineation, subject to Policy 6.2.2 of this element, at the time of project
permitting to determine the exact location ofjurisdictional wetland boundaries.
The property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands. A formal wetland
jurisdictional with the SFWMD was completed on May 21s`, 2008 by Holly
Bauer- Windhorst. She confirmed that there are no jurisdictional wetlands on the
property. See attached formal wetland determination (Application No. 080318-
15); it is attached as Exhibit 4 of the EIS.
EAC Meeting
Page 5 of 9
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 88 of 266
GOAL 7: THE COUNTY SHALL PROTECT AND CONSERVE ITS
FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE.
OBJECTIVE 7.1
The County shall direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal
species and their habitats. The County relies on the listing process of State
and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because
of their endangered, threatened, or species ofspecial concern status. Listed
animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or
species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A- 27.003, 68A- 27.004,
and 68A- 27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal
agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17.
Policy 7.1.2:
Within areas of Collier County, excluding the lands contained in the RLSA
Overlay, nonagricultural development, excluding individual single family
residences, shall be directed away from listed species and their habitats by
complying with the following guidelines and standards:
The most recent wildlife survey for the NNUMC property is included as
attachment to the EIS. An offsite relocation permit from the FWC was received
and the tortoise on the property have been relocated to the City Gate recipient site
in the northern Picayune Strand State Forest.
VI. MAJOR ISSUES
A. Stormwater Management
The North Naples United Methodist Church ( NNUMC) SFWMD ERP dates back
to 1999. The parcel that the northern church property sits on is part of the
Autumn Woods PUD (a.k.a. 300 Acre Goodlette Road PUD) and that PUD's
water management system is the receiving body for runoff from NNUMC.
Autwmi Woods sits within the Gordon River Extension Basin and discharge is
from the southeast corner toward the south.
The NNUMC was first permitted by SFWMD as modification —P -02 under
ERP11- 01474, which is the overall permit for Autumn Woods. Any additions or
modifications to the site will be reviewed and handled by SFWMD.
EAC Meeting
Page 6 of 9
B. Environmental
1. Site Description
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 89 of 266
The site is currently undeveloped and consists of shrub and brushland with
exotics; melaleuca; and a small pine flatwood area. The exotic vegetation on the
property includes downy rose myrtle, Brazilian pepper, old world climbing fern,
and melaleuca, According to the 1975 aerial, the entire property was used for
agriculture at that time. Since that time, native and exotic vegetation has grown
back on the property
2. Wetlands
The property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands. A formal wetland
jurisdictional has been completed by the SFWMD.
3. Preservation Requirements
The proposed use of the property is a MPUD and therefore 15% of the existing
native vegetation on the property is required to be preserved. The calculations for
this property are as follows:
13.09 acres total
-1.86 acres FPL and Goodlette -Frank ROW
-0.36 acres City of Naples UE
-1.29 acres FLUCCS 424 melaleuca
-1.62 acres Lygodium monoculture area
=7.96 acres existing indigenous vegetation "15% = 1.19 acres to be preserved
Staff worked with the applicant to select an appropriate preserve location. The
rear of the property is mostly monoculture of exotic vegetation or high percentage
of exotic vegetation. This resulted in placing the 1.19 acre preserve in the
southwest corner of the property abutting the various easements on the property.
The preserve constitutes some of the best habitat on the property on includes a
number of large oak trees. The specific configuration of the preserve can be
found on the Master Concept Plan.
4. Listed Species
A protected species survey was conducted in 2007. During the survey, 19
active, 10 inactive, and 10 abandoned burrows were flagged in the field. An
offsite relocation permit from the FWC was received and the tortoise on the
property have been relocated to the City Gate recipient site in the northern
EAC Meeting
Page 7 of 9
VII.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 90 of 266
Picayune Strand State Forest. All burrows on the property were excavated on July
30`h, 31St, and August I"2008by Jeremy Sterk of Davidson Engineering and Ray
Ashton of the Ashton Biodiversity Organization. A total of 12 tortoises were
excavated from the property and relocated to the approved recipient site. It
appeared that individual tortoise on the NNUMC property were utilizing more
than one burrow; this would explain the low density based on the number of
burrows excavated. Field data sheets and appropriate information were forwarded
to the FWC after completion of the relocation.
Staff recommends approval of Naples United Methodist Church PUDZ- 2008 -AR-
13375 with no stipulations.
EAC Meeting
Page 8 of 9
PREPARED BY:
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 91 of 266
SUMMER ARAQ JE' DATE
SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
COLLIER COUNTY ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, COMPREHENSIVE
PLANNING, AND ZONING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
NANCY GrN%A�H, AICP
4`►0,o
DATE
COLLIER COUNTY ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, COMPREHENSIVE
PLANNING, AND ZONING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
t-q APR to
STAN CHRZANO KI, P.E. DATE
ENGINEERING VIEW MANAGER
COLLIER COUNTY ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, COMPREHENSIVE
PLANNING, AND ZONING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
EAC Meeting
Page 9 of 9
REVIEWED BY:
6189"a
AL SPECIALIST
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 92 of 266
y. D -O o
DATE
COLLIER'COUNTY ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, COMPREHENSIVE
PLANNING, AND ZONING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DIRECTOR
04- 20 -2-ol0
DATE
COLLIER COUNTY ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, COMPREHENSIVE
PLANNING, AND ZONING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
OFFICE OF THE COLLIER COUNTY ATTORNEY
APPROVED BY:
Y1o1a
DATE
c{ -lO -IU
I\ZCK tASALANa4bA-x DATE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INTERIM
DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
DE
I�.�VIDSON
N INEERING
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27. 2010
Page 93 of 266
CIVIL ENGINEERING • PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS)
NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
REZONE PARCEL
SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST
APPROXIMATELY 13.09 ACRES
COLLIER COUNTY
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FL 34104
Dated: May 22, 2008
Revised: November 19, 2008
March 5, 2009
3550 Kraft Road Suite 301 - Naples, Florida 34109 - Phone: 239.434,6060 - Fax: Z39.434.60E4
www. davi dsonengi n eerie g. corn
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 94 of 266
DE
Q.'3YlRFlpm
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
10.02.02 Submittal Requirements for All Applications
a Applicant information.
Responsible person who wrote the EIS and his /her education and job related environmental
experience.
The author of this Environmental Impact Statement is:
Jeremy Sterk, B.S.
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301
Naples, Florida 34105
Phone: 239-434-6060
Email: ieremy_@dayidsog U ringgom
Mr. Sterk has been an environmental consultant in Southwest Florida since 1994.
A resume included as Exhibit,
ii. Owner(s) /agent(s) name, address, phone number & e -mail address.
Owner:
North Naples United Methodist Church (NNUMC)
6000 Goodlette Road
Naples, FL 34109
Agent:
DIE
DAVNDSD N,Tim Hancock, A1CP
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301
Naples, Florida 34105
Phone: 239-434-6060
Email: timPdavidsonengineering,,ym
4L
cnvirmmnrmal impact statenten102 13.09.dacx 2
www.davidsonengineeiiiig.com
Ed
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 95 of 266
DE
RIVIPP84
b. Mapping and support graphics.
1. General location map.
PROJECT LOCATION: The project site is located immediately East of Goodlette-
Frank Road, approximately 1,500 feet north of Pine Ridge Road. See (Figure 1)
location map.
RXowosw+aoweutu+amc. NN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
9MM nNA" MIOAD, WrE 301 WM98, FLOMDA 94,05
wroxE(ta1 09Aa0M PAX rl )u9+MM Location Map
COMPANY M. NO. MMMM
Figure 1. Site Location Map
..r-mnmenraumpari Statement 02-43- 09.duo, 3
1vww. d avi dson a ugi neering.co m
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 96 of 266
DFM
Pa°zY;41'9M
THE IMMEDIATE AREA OF THE NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH PARCEL:
NORTH: Existing North Naples United Methodist Church Campus
WEST: Goodlette -Frank Road ROW
SOUTH: Panther Lane Professional Office Development
EAST: Collier County Public School (Pine Ridge Middle School)
it Native habitats and their boundaries identified on an aerial photograph of the site extending at least
200 feet outside the parcel boundary. This does not mean the applicant is required to go on to
adjoining properties. Habitat identification consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation
Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) shall be depicted on an aerial
photograph having a scale of one inch equal to at least 200 feet when available from the County.
Other scale aerials may be used where appropriate for the size of the project; provided the
photograph and overlays are legible at the scale provided. A legend for each of the FLUCCS categories
found on -site shall be included on the aerial.
Native communities were mapped according to the Florida Department of
Transportation Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS)
and their boundaries are depicted below and on the attached FLUCCS map. Three
maps are included below or as exhibits:
F.iLyue 2 8.5 "x11" 2007 aerial at a scale of 1" =200'
Figure 3: 8.5"X 11" sheet with only FLUCCS mapping (no aerial)
Exhibit 2: 24 "x 36" 2008 aerial at 1" =100'
All maps detail FLUCCS mapping within 200 feet of the PUD boundary. This
additional mapping outside the boundary of the project was done through aerial
interpretation.
1/
Environmental Impart Statemenl 02- 13.09.do= 4 www.davidsonengineering.com
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 97 of 266
DE
RA NiN9M
WDAMSON9#GMW RGIO,GIC. NN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
7M KRAFT ROAD, GIRT! 401 NAPLES, FLORWA 74106
Y�,43"WFAXCMi43"N4 2008 AERIAL WITH FLUCCS MAPPING
Figure 2. 2008 Aerial with FLUCCS Mapping
EnvimnmenW Impact Statement 02- 13.09.doa
www.davidsoiiengineei-ing.com
e
PpaYl ARN
172 i00
4'647 a
4
� 4 asiii0i2 320
g 32014 171
8
K
r
ia1
panvier Lane
N
w +r:
s
0 200
�I�Feet
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 98 of 266
A
EDAVIDSON 3530 KRAFT ROAD, SUITE 01:• NN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
3630 KRAFT ROAD, W FAX 301 ) 4U.M, FLORIDA 34106
PZY!.4g.4NCOMPANY0. NO. �9496 434 FLUCCS MAPPING
Figure 3. FLUCCS Mapping IL
Environmental Impart Statement 021309.doa 6 www.davidSoiiengineering.coni
�hrucwry
ws
�rn.w
iw.owmmrr �.mnw
i.snnewonimvKH
n..unmma�imcRVUu
M NY.TRYI4PR�IR�
iiI MIEI..lWNAIO
mo m�wlMw.siuw
.wu onMSwAti.wrv�
m,nenmraop
.wu M6ronmaamrwpuowc * ov
arum+
4Mw/9.wagR
A
EDAVIDSON 3530 KRAFT ROAD, SUITE 01:• NN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
3630 KRAFT ROAD, W FAX 301 ) 4U.M, FLORIDA 34106
PZY!.4g.4NCOMPANY0. NO. �9496 434 FLUCCS MAPPING
Figure 3. FLUCCS Mapping IL
Environmental Impart Statement 021309.doa 6 www.davidSoiiengineering.coni
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 99 of 266
iii. Topographic map and existing drainage patterns if applicable. Where possible, elevations within each
of FLUCCS categories shall be provided.
Site elevations vary from approximately 10.3 feet NGVD to 14.3 feet NGVD.
Currently drainage appears to be to the south and southeast. See topographic map
below (Figure 4). There are multiple elevations in each FLUCCS community and
arrows that depict general flow of surface water. The variety in topographic
elevations is due to the agricultural "furrows" that still exist on the property.
oAVMM010rMaa.m NN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
PA Was NNW RWa sun m mom, nor" U104 C0/!a �Rm. N TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING
0. N*=ra" ANON
NY Figure 4. Topographic Mapping
Environmental Impact Statement 02,13.09.dom
www.davidsonengineering.com
PCaYl4�.4
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 100 of 266
iv. Soils map at scale consistent with that used for the Florida Department of Transportation Florida
Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System determinations.
Soils lines have been digitized from the Natural Resources Conservation Service
(MRCS) map of Collier County. A map detailing the soil types found on the subject
property is below (Figure 5).
The Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) maps a single soil type on the
property:
NRCS 07, Immokalee fine sand (listed as non- hydric)
Specific details for each soil type are below:
NRCS 07 -Immo alee fine gaud
This soil is generally level and poorly drained. The surface layer is typically dark
fine sand about 6 inches thick The subsurface layer is light gray fine sand. The
permeability is moderate. According to NRCS, typical vegetation might include slash
pine, wax myrtle, creeping bluestem, and saw palmetto.
o d9m NN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
AMRpt •��••+•••• �•'•iuw '.e1'OR1D'""O' NRCS SOILS MAPPING
Figure S. NRCS Soils Mapping
YnV1rO➢mCnta1 I mpact Statement 0213- 09.dca 8 www.davidsonLngineering.com
C—
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 101 of 266
DIE
Pa°a17RFen
V. Proposed drainage plan indicating basic flow patterns, outfall and off -site drainage.
See Drainage Concept Plan provided by Davidson Engineering, included in Exhibit
vi. Development plan including phasing program, service area of existing and proposed public facilities,
and existing and proposed transportation network in the impact area.
See proposed Master Concept Plan provided by Davidson Engineering, included in
Exhibit R
Public Facilities Public facilities are already in place in the vicinity of the NNUMC
property. The church is not proposing construction of any additional public
facilities.
Traffic Network- The property fronts on and directly connects to the Goodlete-
Frank road corridor. The church is not proposing any additional transportation
network changes otter than internal roads within the site.
viL Site plan showing preserves on -site, and how they align with preserves on adjoining and neighboring
properties. Include on the plan locations of proposed and existing development, roads, and areas for
stormwater retention, as shown on approved master plans for these sites, as well as public owned
conservation lands, conservation acquisition areas, major flowways and potential wildlife corridors.
The proposed Master Concept Plan is included in Exhibit It details the locations
of the proposed preserve, lake, development areas, and access points.
The proposed preserve and lake on the NNUMC property interface with the lake and
preserve on the Panther Lane Professional Center property to the south
The property is not adjacent to any public owned conservation lands, conservation
acquisition areas, major flow -ways, or potential wildlife corridors.
viii. For properties in the RLSA or RFMU districts, a site plan showing the location of the site, and land use
designations and overlays as identified in the Growth Management Plan.
Not Applicable. The NNUMC parcel is not located in the RLSA or the RFMU.
c Project description and GMP consistency determination.
Provide an overall description of the project with respect to environmental and water management
issues.
RENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed rezone will change the general uses permitted on the Property from
agriculture to commercial and community facility uses consistent with the PUD document.
Environmental Impact Stalement 08.73-09.doc
www.davidsoiiengineering.com
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 102 of 266
R9
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
Below is a discussion of the various environmental issues on the NNUMC property:
GOPHER TORTOISE:
A small population of gopher tortoise resides on the NNUMC property. A protected species
survey was conducted in 2007. During the survey, 19 active, 10 inactive, and 10
abandoned burrows were flagged in the field. It is estimated 90 % of potential habitat was
surveyed. This results in the following estimated tortoise density calculations:
19 active + 10 inactive burrows = 29 burrows @ 90% coverage
Estimated 33 active or inactive burrows @ 100% coverage (29 burrows \0.90)
Estimated burrow occupancy rate of 0.614 for all active and inactive burrows (FWC
criteria)
33 burrows x 0.614 = 20.26 (21) tortoise that may reside on the property, however the
actual number is expected to be lower.
Occupied habitat = 8.61 acres (Naples UE & FLUCCS 832 & FLUCCS 320 communities)
Therefore, tortoise density on the property is approximately 2.44 tortoise per acre (21
tortoise \8.61 acres of occupied habitat)
All documented burrows were flagged in the field and their location taken by GPS. See
attached Protected Species Survey for specific locations.
UPDATE:
An offsite relocation permit from the FWC was received and the tortoise on the property
have been relocated to the City Gate recipient site in the northern Picayune Strand State
Forest All burrows on the property were excavated on July 30th, 319, and August 1s, by
Jeremy Sterk of Davidson Engineering and Ray Ashton of the Ashton Biodiversity
Organization. A total of 12 tortoise were excavated from the property and relocated to the
approved recipient site. It appeared that individual tortoise on the NNUMC property were
utilizing more than one burrow, this would explain the low density based on the number of
burrows excavated. Field data sheets and appropriate information were forwarded to the
FWC after completion of the relocation.
BIG CYPRESS FOR SQUIRREL.:
No Big Cypress Fox Squirrels or signs of fox squirrels have been observed during protected
species surveys.
FLORIDA PANTHER:
The NNUMC property lies outside the USFWS current (and former) "Panther Focus Area".
The property is surrounded by development and is located several miles west of Interstate
75. The panther focus area map is found below (Figure 6). According to the Florida
Panther Effect Determination Key, the site does not require consultation because it falls
outside the focus area and it will not change vehicular traffic patterns. r
Environmental Impact Statement 021309.dorx 10 www.davidsnnengineering.com <
-
DIE
°�aY4 PA
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 103 of 266
DCimra.anemr..�tne..v;. NNUMC
`NIOo egad ew.aot a 0.e 1 1.6 3
p��!4RRM. � >� Florida Panther SEWS Ion �Mhft
(Date provWed by USFWB 8 PAC)
Figure 6. Florida Panther Information
LISTED PLANT SPECIES:
The NNUMC site does have suitable habitat for listed plant species and individuals have
been observed as epiphytes on trees within the property.
MMTLANn.g.
There are no wetlands on the NNUMC property. Because of its size, the project's water
management system is expected to be reviewed by Collier County, therefore a request for a
formal wetland jurisdictional was submitted to the SFWMD. A formal wetland
Environmental Impact Statement 0243- 09.doa li
www.davidsonengineering.com
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 104 of 266
E
P .'%vWso,M
jurisdictional with the SFWMD was completed on May 218, 2008 by Holly Bauer -
Windhorst She confirmed that there are no jurisdictional wetlands on the property. See
attached formal wetland determination (Application No. 080318 -15). It is attached as
Exhibit 4.
NATIVE VEGETATION:
The proposed use of the property is a CPUD and therefore 15% of the existing native
vegetation on the property is required to be preserved. The calculations for this property
are as follows:
1.09 acres toW
-1.86 acres FPL and Goodlette -Frank ROW
-0.36 acres City of Naples UE
-1.29 acres FLUCCS 424 melaleuca
-1.62 acres Lygodium monoculture area
=7.96 acres existing indigenous vegetation *15% =1.19 acres to be preserved
WATER MANAGEMENT ISS iESNO RIPTION:
The following is a description of the proposed water management system:
The project site is located in Section 10, Township 49 S, Range 25 E of Collier County
Florida. The proposed site will comprised of pre - treatment dry detention areas and control
structures which will discharges into the on -site lake. The proposed lake will provide the
required water quality and attenuation required per Collier County and SFWMD criteria.
The lake will discharge via a control structure to existing drainage system along Goodlette-
Frank Road. The peak discharge rate from a design storm will be limited to 0.15 cubic feet
per second /acre rate per Collier County Ordinance No. 2001 -27.
The entire site is located within a FEMA zone '10" with no base floor elevation specified.
The water management system for the project proposes the construction of a perimeter
berm with a crest elevation set at /or above the 25 year - 3 day peak flood stage.
ii. Explain how the project is consistent with each of the Objectives and Policies in the Conservation and
Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, where applicable.
Policy 2.2.2
In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of stormwater run -off, stormwater systems should be
designed in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an attempt is made to
enhance the timing, quantity and quality of fresh water to the estuarine system. Non - structural methods such
as discharge and storage in wetlands are encouraged.
The stormwater management system for the NNUMC property has been designed
according to SFWMD rules and criteria. Because of its size, the project's water
management system is expected to be reviewed by Collier County. Issuance of the ERP by
the SFWMD or approval of the water management system by Collier County will deem the
project in compliance with this policy.
Environmental Impact Statement 02- 13-09.doa 12 www.davidsonengineering.cmn
61
DE
P.1"P• 89.19
Policy 2.2.3
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 105 of 266
Chemical spraying for aquatic weed control should be conducted with extreme caution The use of
appropriate biological and mechanical (use of harvesting equipment to remove vegetation) controls in
both the canal system and stormwater detention ponds is encouraged. Manufacturers and EPA
guidelines for chemical use in aquatic habitat will be followed.
Any aquatic areas (lakes) created in conjunction with this project will be subject to and will
adhere to this policy.
GOAL 6: THE COUNTY SHALL IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE ITS NATIVE
VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT.
OBJECTIVE 6.1
The County shall protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum
preservation requirements. The following policies provide criteria to make this objective
measurable. These policies shall apply to all of Collier County except for that portion of the County
which is identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as the Rural Lands Stewardship Area
Overlay.
Policy 6.1.1
For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and
Agricultural /Rural Mixed Use District, Rural- Industrial District and Rural- Settlement Area District as
designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved on -site through the application of the
following preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria...
The NNUMC CPUD is a mixed use project with Commercial and Community Facility uses in
the Urban Designated Area and therefore under current code is subject to providing 15%
native vegetation.
The calculations for this property are as follows (See included FLUCCS mapping for
locations):
13.09 acres total
-1.86 acres FPL and Goodlette -Frank ROW
-0.36 acres City of Naples UE
-1.29 acres FLUCCS 424 melaleuca
-1.62 acres Lygodium monoculture area
=7.96 acres existing indigenous vegetation *15% =1.19 acres to be preserved
Policy 6.1.4:
Prohibited invasive exotic vegetation shall be removed from all new developments.
(1) Petitioners for site plan or plats shall submit and Implement plans for invasive exotic plant removal
and long -term control.
(2) The petitioners for development permits shall prepare and submit native vegetation maintenance
plans, which describe specific techniques to prevent re- invasion of the development site by prohibited
exotic vegetation of the site in perpetuity.
(3) The County shall maintain a list of prohibited invasive exotic vegetation species within the Collier
County Land Development Code and will update such list as necessary.
Environmental Impart statement (1243 -Kdorx
13
www.david sonengi neering.cmn
RE
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 106 of 266
The NNUMC property does contain exotic and nuisance vegetation. Melaleuca, Brazilian
pepper, lygodium, and earleaf acacia are the species with the greatest presence. Exotic
densities vary throughout the site, but are extremely dense in the southwest corner of the
property. All exotics will be removed from the site according to the included Preserve
Management Plan (PMP), Exhibit The site will be maintained free of exotic and nuisance
vegetation in perpetuity.
Policy 6.1.7:
The County shall require native vegetation to be incorporated into landscape designs in order to promote
the preservation of native plant communities and to encourage water conservation. This shall be
accomplished by:
(1) Providing incentives for retaining existing native vegetation in landscaped areas;
(2) Establishing minimum native vegetation requirements for new landscaping; and,
(3) Wet detention ponds within the Urban Designated area shall have a littoral shelf with an area equal
to 2.5% of the ponds surface area measured at the control elevation and be planted with native
aquatic vegetation, Wet detention ponds within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, shall have
a littoral shelf with an area equal to 30% of the ponds surface area measured at the control
elevation and he planted with native aquatic vegetation.
(4) Stormwater management systems within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) Overlay shall be
designed pursuant to the RLSA policies found in the Future Land Use Element
The NNUMC project will utilize native vegetation species throughout project landscaping,
littoral zones, and perimeter bufFers as required by current County code. -1J
Policy 61.8:
An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), or submittal of appropriate environmental data as specified in
the County s land development regulations, is required, to provide a method to objectively evaluate the
impact of a proposed development, site alteration, or project upon the r e s o u r c e s a n d
environmental quality of the project area and the community and to insure
that planning and zoning decisions are made with a complete understanding of the impact of such
decisions upon the environment, to encourage projects and developments that will protect, conserve
and enhance, but not degrade, the environmental quality and resources of the particular project or
development site, the general area and the greater community. The County s land development
regulations shall establish the criteria for determining the type of proposed development requiring an EIS,
including the size and nature of the proposed development the location of the proposed development in
relation to existing environmental characteristics, the degree of site alterations, and other pertinent
information.
Please refer to this document
OBJECTIVE 6.2:
The County shall protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands pursuant to the
appropriate policies under Goal 6. The following policies provide criteria to make this objective
measurable. The County's wetland protection policies and strategies shall be coordinated with
the Watershed Management Plans as required by Objective 2.1 of this Element to
Emdromnental Impact Statement 02- 13- 09.docx 14 www.davidsonengineerii)g.com
Ed
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 107 of 266
E
Policy 6.2.1:
As required by Florida Administrative Code 9J5- S.006(1)(b), wetlands identified by the 199495 SFWMD
land use and land cover inventory are mapped on the Future Land Use Map series. These areas shall be
verified bya jurisdictional field delineation, subject to Policy 6.2.2 of this element, at the time of project
permitting to determine the enact location of jurisdictional wetland boundaries.
The property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands. A formal wetland jurisdictional
with the SFWMD was completed on May 216; 2008 by Holly Bauer - Windhorst, She
confirmed that there are no jurisdictional wetlands on the property. See attached formal
wetland determination (Application No. 080318 -15). It is attached as ExhIhJt ¢
Policy 6.2.2:
Wetlands shall be defined pursuant to Section 373.019 Florida Statutes. The location of jurisdictional
wetland boundaries are further described by the delineation methodology in Section 373.421 Florida
Statutes.
The property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands. A formal wetland jurisdictional
with the SFWMD was completed on May 215 2008 by Holly Bauer- Windhorst. She
confirmed that there are no jurisdictional wetlands on the property. See attached formal
wetland determination (Application No. 080318 -15). It is attached as Exhibit 4.
Policy 6.2.3:
Collier County shall implement a comprehensive process to ensure wetlands and the natural functions of
wetlands are protected and conserved...
On a project- specific basis, wetlands and wetland functions shall be protected through the following
mechanisms:
(1) Federal and State jurisdictional agency review and wetland permitting;
(2) Vegetation preservation policies supporting CCME Objective 6.1;
(3) Wetiand protection policies supporting CCME Objective 6.2;
(4) Clustering provisions specified in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the FLUE
(5) The protection of wetlands that are part of an established watershed management plan, as per
Objective 2.1 of this Element
(6) Land or easement acquisition.
(7) Land owner incentives, such as transferable development rights, tax relief, or USDA grants for
restoration.
The property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands. A formal wetland jurisdictional
with the SFWMD was completed on May 216, 2008 by Holly Bauer- Windhorst. She
confirmed that there are no jurisdictional wetlands on the property. See attached formal
wetland determination (Application No. 080318 -15). It is attached as Exyihit 4.
Environmental Impact Statemr.»t 0213- 09.doa is
www.davidsoiiengineei,iiig.com
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 108 of 266
Policy 6.2.4:
Within the Urban Designated area, the County shall rely on the wetland jurisdictional
determinations and permit requirements issued by the applicable jurisdictional agency, except for
wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan preserve area. The County shall direct impacts
away from such wetlands.
This policy shall be implemented as follows;
(1) Where permits issued by such jurisdictional agencies allow for impacts to wetlands within
this designated area and require mitigation for such impacts, this shall be deemed to meet the
objective of protection and conservation of wetlands and the natural functions of
wetlands within this area, except for wetlands that are part of a Watershed Management Plan
preserve area. The County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands.
(2) The County shall require the appropriate jurisdictional permit prior to the issuance of a final local
development order permitting site improvements, except in the case of single- family residences,
which are not part of an approved development or are not platted, unless the residences are
within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan
developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element in which case the
appropriate jurisdictional permit is required prior to the issuance of a final local development
order permitting site improvements.
(3) Collier County will work with the jurisdictional agencies and applicants to encourage mitigation
to occur within targeted areas of the County including, but not limited to: Natural Resource
Protection Areas (NRPAs); lands targeted for a acquisition by a public or private conservation
entity; wetlands that are part of an approved watershed management plan, as per
Objective 2.1 of this Element; and other areas appropriate for mitigation, such as flow ways and
areas containing habitat for animal listed species.
I4) Within the immokalee Urban Designated Area, there may exist high quality wetland
systems connected to the Lake Trafford /Camp Keats Strand system. These wetlands require
greater protection measures than wetlands located in other portions of the Urban Designated
Area, and therefore the wetland protection standards set forth in Policy 6.2.5 shall apply in this
area. This area is generally identified as the area designated as Wetlands Connected To lake
Trafford /Camp Keats Strand System on the immokalee Future land Use Map and Is located in
the southwest immokalee Urban designated area, connected to the Lake Trafford /Camp Keais
System. Within one (1) year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall
adopt land development regulations to determine the process and specific circumstances when
the provisions of Policy 6.2.5 will apply.
NNUMC is located within the Urban Designated area of Collier County.
The property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands. A formal wetland jurisdictional
with the SFWMD was completed on May 21n, 2008 by Holly Bauer - Windhorst She
confirmed that there are no jurisdictional wetlands on the property. See attached formal
wetland determination (Application No. 080318 -15). It is attached as Exhibit 4.
Policy 6.2.6:
Within the Urban Designation and Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, [required] wetland preservation,
buffer areas, and mitigation areas shall be dedicated as conservation and common areas In the form of
conservation easements and shall be identified and platted as separate tracts; and, in the case of a
Planned Unit Development (PUD), these areas shall also be depicted on the PUD Master Plan. These areas
shall be maintained free from trash and debris and from Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by
the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. Land uses allowed in these areas shall be limited to those listed
In Policy 6.2.5(5)d of this element and shall not include any other activities that are detrimental to
drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control or fish and wildlife habitat conservation and
preservation
Fnvironmental Impact Stalement 02.1309.docx 16 www.davidsonengineering.com
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 109 of 266
DBE
NVIRsoy
The proposed preserve will be placed under a conservation easement at time of platting or
SDP approval. All preserves, buffers, and common areas on the NNUMC Property will be
maintained according to the included Preserve Management Plan (PMP). It is included as
Exhibit i.
GOAL 7: THE COUNTY SHALL PROTECT AND CONSERVE ITS FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE.
OBJECTIVE 7.1
The County shall direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats.
The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require
special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed
animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has
designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-
27.003, 68A- 27.004, and 68A- 27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies
as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17.
Policy 7.1.1
Incompatible land uses are directed away from listed species and their habitats by the following
mechanisms:
(1) Conservation Designation on the Future Land Use Map
The overall purpose of the Conservation Designation is to conserve and maintain the natural
resources of Collier County and their associated environmental, recreational and economic benefits.
These areas have been demonstrated to have high wildlife value. The allowed land uses
specified in the FLUE's Conservation Designation will accommodate limited residential
development and future non - residential development These limitations help direct many
incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats contained in this Future Land
Use Designation. (Reference FLUE: Future Land Use Designation, Description Section.)
(2) Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern Overlay (ACSC)
The land development regulations contained in the ACSC Overlay district provide standards that
facilitate the goal of directing incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats.
(Reference FLUE: Future Land Use Designation, Description Section.)
(3) Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs)
The purpose of Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs) is to support State and Federal
agencies' efforts to protect endangered or potentially endangered species and their habitats
(Reference CCME: Objective 1.3). These areas describe large, intact and relatively unfragmented
habitats important for many listed species. Allowable land uses, vegetation preservation
standards, development standards, and listed species protection criteria within N RPAs are
specified in the FLUE. (Reference the FLUE for the specific requirements.) The NRPA
Overlay is intended to direct incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats.
(4) Sending Lands (Transfer of Development Rights):
Sending Lands are those lands that have a high degree of environmental value and sensitivity and
generally include wetlands, uplands, and habitat for listed species. Due to their high environmental
value, Sending Lands are targeted for preservation and conservation either through acquisition or
through incentives for private property owners. Privately owned lands within the Rural Fringe
Mixed Use District that have a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) Overlay are considered to
be Sending Lands, Allowable land uses within Sending Lands are specified in the FLUE: Future
Land Use Designation, Description Section, B. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District These limitations
help direct many incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats.
(5) Habitat Stewardship Areas (HSAs)
Listed animal and plant species and their habitats shall also be protected through the establishment
•v ^<<..... umm uv,o-un.aoot 77 wtvw.davidsonengineering.com
Q13
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 110 of 266
of Habitat Stewardship Areas (HSAs) within the RLSA Overlay. HSAs areprivately owned
agricultural areas, which include areas with natural characteristics that make them
suitable habitat for listed species and areas without these characteristics. These latter
areas are included because they are located contiguous to habitat and help form a
continuum of landscape that can augment habitat values. The Overlay provides an
incentive to permanently protect HSAs by the creation and transfer of Credits
resulting in the elimination of incompatible uses and the establishment of protection
measures. (Reference FLUE. RLSA Overlay.)
(6) All other policies supporting Objective 7.1 of this element
Not Applicable. The site will have no negative effect on Conservation Areas, ASCS's, NRPAs,
Sending Lands, or HSAs.
L
Policy 7.1.2:
Within areas of Collier County, excluding the lands contained in the RLSA Overlay, nonagricultural
development, excluding individual single family residences, shall be directed away from listed species and
their habitats by complying with the following guidelines and standards:
(1) A wildlife survey shall be required for all parcels when listed species are known to inhabit biological
communities similar to those existing on site or where listed species are directly observed on the site. The
survey shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission ( FFWCC) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) guidelines. The County
shall notify the FFWCC and USFWS of the existence of any listed species that may be discovered.
(2) Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall
be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated listed species are utilizing the site, or the
site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs
incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats
(a) Management plans shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species and their
habitat from the negative impacts of proposed development Developments shall be clustered to
discourage impacts to listed species habitats. Open space and vegetation preservation
requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas
dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be
provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage
wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses, and signage
shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors
1. The following references shall be used, as appropriate, to prepare the required management plans;
a.. South Florida Multi- Species Recovery Plan, USFWS, 1999.
b . Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region, USFWS, 1987.
C. Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus
polyphemms) Populations found on Lands Slated for Large Scale Development in Florida,
Technical Report No. 4, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1987.
d. Ecology and Development - Related Habitat Requirements of the Florida Scrub Jay
(Aphelocoma coerulescens), Technical Report No. 8, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission, 1991.
e. Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of the Southeastern American Kestrel (Falco
Sparverius Paulus) on Large -scale Development Sites in Florida, Nongame
Techincal Report No. 13, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1993,
2. The County shall consider any other techniques recommended by the USFWS and the FFWCC,
subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy.
3. When listed species are directly observed on site or indicated by evidence, such as denning,
foraging or other indications, priority shall be given to preserving the listed species habitats
first, as a part of the retained native vegetation requirement contained in Policy 6.1.1
!
and Policy 6.1.2 this element. The County shall also consider the recommendations of
(\
2mdrnnmenta) Impact Statement0b13- 09.dacx is www.davidsoiiP.ngineP.ring.com
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 111 of 266
DE
P aYRIARM
MOW other agencies, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy.
(b) For parcels containing gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), priority shall be given to
protecting the largest most contiguous gopher tortoise habitat with the greatest number of
active burrows, and for providing a connection to off site adjacent gopher tortoise preserves.
(c) Habitat preservation for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) shall conform to the
guidelines contained in Technical Report No. 8, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission, 1991. The required management plan shall also provide for a maintenance
program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural
scrub community. The plan shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents
about the on -site preserve and the need to maintain the scrub vegetation. These requirements
shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi- Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject
to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy.
(d) For the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), the required habitat management plans shall establish
protective zones around the eagle nest restricting certain activities. The plans shall also address
restricting certain types of activities during the nesting seasom These requirements shall be
consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi- Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the
provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy.
(e) For the red - cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the required habitat protection plan shall
outline measures to avoid adverse impacts to active clusters and to minimize impacts to foraging
habitat. Where adverse effects can not be avoided, measures shall be taken to minimize on -site
disturbance and compensate or mitigate for impacts that remain. These requirements shall be
consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi - Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the
provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy.
(f) In areas where the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus>7oridonus) may he present, the management
plans shall require that garbage be placed in bear -proof containers, at one or more central locations.
The management plan shall also identify methods to inform local residents of the concerns related
to interaction between black bears and humans. Mitigation for impacting habitat suitable for
black bear shall be considered in the management plan.
(g) For projects located in Priority I and Priority 11 Panther Habitat areas, the management plan shall
discourage the destruction of undisturbed, native habitats that are preferred by the Florida panther
(Felis concolor coryf) by directing intensive land uses to currently disturbed areas. Preferred
habitats include pine flatwoods and hardwood hammocks. In turn, these areas shall be buffered
from the most intense land uses of the project by using low intensity land uses (e.g., parks, passive
recreational areas, golf courses). Golf courses within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District shall be
designed and managed using standards found in that district The management plans shall identify
appropriate lighting controls for these permitted uses and shall also address the opportunity
to utilize prescribed burning to maintain fire- adapted preserved vegetative communities
and provide browse for white - tailed deer. These requirements shall be consistent with the
UFWS South Florida Multi- Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph
(3) of this policy.
(h) In order to protect loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and other listed sea turtles that nest along
Collier County beaches, projects within 300 feet of the MHW line shall limit outdoor lighting to that
necessary for security and safety. Floodlights and landscape or accent lighting shall be prohibited.
These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi- Species Recovery
Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of Polity 7.1.2(3).
(i) The Management Plans shall contain a monitoring program for developments greater than 10
acres.
(3) The County shall, consistent with applicable GMP policies, consider and utilize
recommendations and letters of technical assistance from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission and recommendations from the US Fish and Wildlife Service in issuing development orders
on property containing listed species. It is recognized that these agency recommendations, on a case
by case basis, may change the requirements contained within these wildlife protection policies and any
such change shall be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan
F.nvlronmemal]mpanStatement 02- 13.09.don 19 www.davidsonengineering.com
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Paae 112 of 266
DE
VZAffl
See below for discussions of each guideline \standard:
(1) Wildlife Survey:
The most recent wildlife survey for the NNUMC property is included as attachment to this
EIS. The species survey is included as Exhibit 6- See listed species section 10.02.02.4gi on
page 25 for summary of listed species discussions.
(2) Wildlife Management Plans:.
Eastern T djgo Snake
Although no signs of Eastern indigo snakes have been observed on the NNUMC property,
the owners will adhere to the USFWS's "Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern
Indigo Snake ". A copy of the protection measures is included as Exhibit 7. As part of the
protection measures an informational sign has been made for posting on the NNUMC
property prior to and during construction activities. A copy of the sign is also included in
Exhibit 7 Per the Standard Protection Measures, the sign will be submitted to the USFWS
for approval at least 30 days prior to clearing activities on the property.
Gopher Tortoise
The NNUMC intends to manage the small population of gopher tortoise on the property
through offsite relocation to a recipient site in the northern Picayune Strand State Forest A
copy of the relocation permit is included as Exhibit $.
UPDATE,
An offsite relocation permit from the FWC was received and the tortoise on the property
have been relocated to the City Gate recipient site in the northern Picayune Strand State
Forest All burrows on the property were excavated on July 30t , 315, and August In by
Jeremy Sterk of Davidson Engineering and Ray Ashton of the Ashton Biodiversity
Organization. A total of 12 tortoise were excavated from the property and relocated to the
approved recipient site. It appeared that individual tortoise on the NNUMC property were
utilizing more than one burrow, this would explain the low density based on the number of
burrows excavated. Field data sheets and appropriate information were forwarded to the
FWC after completion of the relocation.
Listed Plants
The site does contain wild pine ( Tillandsia fasciculate). Prior to clearing (during the pre -
construction gopher tortoise survey) the site will be re- surveyed for Tillandsia and other
listed epiphytic plants such as Florida Butterfly Orchids (Encyclia tampensis). Any
individuals observed during the survey that can be reasonably reached will be relocated to
the preserve area on the property.
4L
EnN�ronnlental lmpact5t2tement 02- 13-09.d= 20 www.davtdsmiengineering.cmn
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 113 of 266
(3) Technical Assistance from FWC and USFWS:
The NNUMC is actively coordinating with the FWC regarding gopher tortoise. Issuance of
the gopher tortoise relocation permit from FWC deems the NNUMC project compliant with
this section and the GMP. A copy of the gopher tortoise relocation permit from the FWC is
included as Exhihit A No Federally listed species have been documented on the property
so no technical assistance has been sought or received
Policy 7.1.4:
All development shall comply with applicable federal and state permitting requirements regarding listed
species protection.
The NNUMC is actively coordinating with the FWC regarding gopher tortoise. Issuance of
the gopher tortoise relocation permit from FWC deems the NNUMC project compliant with
this section and the GMP. A copy of the gopher tortoise relocation permit from the FWC is
included as Exhibit _8 No Federally listed species have been documented on the property
so no technical assistance has been sought or received.
i PDATRe
An offsite relocation permit from the FWC was received and the tortoise on the property
have been relocated to the City Gate recipient site in the northern Picayune Strand State
Forest All burrows on the property were excavated on July 30t , 311, and August 11 by
Jeremy Sterk of Davidson Engineering and Ray Ashton of the Ashton Biodiversity
Organization. A total of 12 tortoise were excavated from the property and relocated to the
approved recipient site. It appeared that individual tortoise on the NNUMC property were
utilizing more than one burrow; this would explain the low density based on the number of
burrows excavated. Field data sheets and appropriate information were forwarded to the
FWC after completion of the relocation.
d. Native vegetation preservation.
I. Identify the acreage and community type of all upland and wetland habitats found on the project site,
according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System ( FLUCCS). Provide a
description of each of the FLUCCS categories identified on -site by vegetation type (species),
vegetation composition (canopy, midstoty and ground cover) and vegetation dominance (dominant,
common and occasional).
The following FLUCCS communities are present on the subject property. See
FLUCCS mapping (EXhi)ut2) for specific locations.
Name- Shrub & Brushland
Qd= FLUCCS 320
Acreage- 6.39 Acres
Description: This community makes up the majority of the property and is
dominated by widely scattered live oak in the canopy along with occasional slash
pine, in most areas of this community the canopy is nearly absent but densities of
Envlromnental Impact Statement 0213- 09.docx 21
www. d avidsonengi n eeri ng. com
E
N %VMPRI d
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 114 of 266
live oak increase towards the southern portion of the property. In most cases the
live oaks are larger specimen trees.
Midstory includes scattered saw palmetto, myrsine, wax myrtle, earleaf acacia,
Brazilian pepper, rusty lyonia, buckthorn, and occasional dense areas of downy rose
myrtle. Other vegetation present includes grapevine, runner oak, winged sumac,
penny royal, prickly pear, poison ivy, Caesars weed, and smilax.
SCIENTIFIC
NAME
COMMON
NAME
STRATUM
320 - Shmb & Brushland
Cnmmnn
live oak
canopy
Rhodomyrtus tomentosa'
downy rose myrde
mid -story
Quercus elliottil
runner oak
ground cover
Smilaxspp•
smilax
vine
Vidsrotundlyolia
muscadine grape
vine
Toxicodendron radicans
poison ivy
vine
Rhus copallina
winged sumac
midstory
Lyoniaferrugineo
rustylyonia
mid -story
Occasional
Bumelia celastrina
buckthorn
mid -story
Quercm virginlana
live oak
canopy
Liatia tenuYblio
blazing star
ground cover
Plnus elliotti
pine (slash pine)
canopy
Sabal palmetto
cabbage palm
canopy
Serenoarepens
saw palmetto
mid -story
Schinusterebinthiyollue
Brazilian pepper
canopy
ldyrlca ceriyero
wax myrtle
mid -story
*invasive exotic
Name, Other Shrubs & Brush -Exotic Invaded
l4tlg: FLUCCS 329E
Acres; 2.59 Acres
Description: This community is dominated by melaleuca and widely scattered live
oak in the canopy. Midstory includes often extremely dense downy rose myrtle and
scattered palmetto. Most of this community has been overwhelmed by exotic and
nuisance vegetation. These areas contain lygodium microphyllum (old world
climbing fern) is such densities that it has formed waist high 'mats" that have
engulfed the entire groundcover and begun to run up all trees. Other vegetation
present includes java plum, Brazilian pepper, scattered swamp fern, bracken fern,
smilax, and grapevine.
Environmental Impact Statement 0213.09.dom 22 wtvw,davidsonengineering.com
kiw
C
L
r
p„SylRio
SCIENTIFIC COMMON
NAME NAME STRATUM
329E - Other Shrubs &
Brush - Exotic Invaded
Rhodomyraes tomentosa*
Schinus terebinthrfolhrs*
Smilaxspp.
Vfiis rotundifolla
Toxirodendron rodicans
Melaleuca quinquevervio*
Lygodium mfcrophyflum*
Occastanal
Pinus efflottl
Quemus virgintana
4vnfa ferroginea
Serena repens
*invasive exotic
downy rose myrtle
mid -story
Brazilian pepper
canopy
smilax
vine
muscadine grape
vine
poison ivy
vine
melaleuca
canopy
old world climbing fern
groundcwver
pine (slash pine)
canopy
live oak
canopy
rusty lyonla
mid -story
saw palmetto
mid -story
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 115 of 266
Brame, Pine Flatwoods - Graminoid Understory-Exotic Invaded
Q1L FLUCCS 416E
AcreaLre- 0.60 Acres
Description: This community is found in two pockets in the northeast corner of the
site. Canopy is dominated by melaleuca and scattered slash pine. Midstory includes
downy rose myrtle, Brazilian pepper, myrsine, and java plum. Groundcover is often
dominated by dense ftodium microphyllum (old world climbing fern), but also
includes grapevine, bracken fern, and smilax.
SCIENTIFIC COMMON
NAME NAME STRATUM
416- Pine Flatwoods-
Graminold Understory-
Exotic Invaded
Common
Wale= qulnquevervia* melaleuca canopy
Lygodlummicrophyllum* old world climbing fern groundcover
Occusynng
Schinus terebinthifolius* Brazilian pepper mid -story
Pinuselliotli pine (slash pine) canopy
lifts rotundrfolia muscadine grape ground cover
Blechnum serrulatum swamp fern ground cover
*invasive exotic
Environmental Impact Statement 02.13-09.doc 23
www.davidsonengineering.com
D°aYl9
Acenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 116 of 266
Name: Melaleuca
C2& FLUCCS 424
Acreage: 1.29 Acres
Description: Canopy vegetation is dominated by melaleuca in densities greater than
75%. Midstory is also dominated by melaleuca. Groundcover is dominated by a
dense carpet of Lygodium. Other vegetation present includes Caesar's weed,
grapevine, and smilax.
SCIENTIFIC COMMON
NAME NAME STRATUM
424 - Melaleuca
commBa
Melaleuca quinquevervia* melaleuca canopy
Lygodium microphyIIum* old world climbing fern groundcover
Occasion °)
Schinustertebfnthifolius* Brazilian pepper mid -story
Vttts rotundUblia muscadine grape ground cover
Blechnum serrulatum swamp fern ground cover
*invasive exotic
Name: FPL Easement & Goodlette -Frank ROW
Code: FLUCCS 832
Acreage: 1.86 Acres
Description: This community makes up the western boundary of the property. It
Includes a portion of Goodlette -Frank road and a Florida Power and Light (FPL)
utility easement The FPL easement is dominated by saw palmetto. Other
vegetation present includes rusty lyonia, runner oak, grapevine, buckthorn, winged
sumac, poison ivy, and pennyroyal.
Name: City of Naples Utility Easement
Acreagei 0.36 Acres
Descriptions This portion of the property is encumbered by a City of Naples Utility
Easement Vegetation present includes scattered oak, saw palmetto, rusty lyonia,
runner oak, grapevine, buckthorn, winged sumac, poison ivy, and pennyroyal.
ii. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in Goal 6 of
the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and Chapters 4
and 10 of the land Development Code. Provide an exhibit illustrating such Include calculations
identifying the acreage for preservation and Impact, per FLUCCS category,
Environmental Impact Statement 02- 73 -Mdoc 24 . www.davidsonengineering.cmn
A
5
DE
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 117 of 266
The proposed use of the property is a CPUD and therefore 15% of the existing native
vegetation on the property is required to be preserved. The calculations for this
property are as follows:
-1.86 acres FPL and Goodlette -Frank ROW
-0.36 acres City of Naples UE
-1.29 acres FLUCCS 424 melaleuca
-1.62 acres Lygodium monoculture area
=7.96 acres existing indigenous vegetation "15% a 1.19 acres to be preserved
The NNUMC is providing a 1.19 acre preserve in the southwest corner of the
property. The preserve constitutes some of the best habitat on the property on
includes a number of large oak trees. The specific configuration of the preserve can
be found on the Master Concept Plan.
The following table provides a breakdown of each FLUCCS community for the
parcel:
Existing Parcel
Proposed
FLUCCS
Code
Acre
ExistinW14.2%J.86
pact Impact
e a Percent
Preserve
Percent
320
6.39
.19 81.4%
18.6%
329E
2.59
.59 100%
0
416E
D.6O
.60 1()0%
0
424
1.29
29 100%
0
832
1.86
.86 100 ° /6
0
UE
0.36
2.7%
0.36 100%
0
Total:
13.09
100%
iii. For sites already cleared and in agricultural use, provide documentation that the parcel (s) are in
compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation in Policy 6.1.5 of the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element of the Growth Management Plan and Chapters 4 and 10 of the Land
Development Code. For sites cleared prior to January 2003, provide documentation that the parcel
(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the Growth
Management Plan and Land Development Code.
Not applicable. The site was historically in agricultural use but over years has re-
vegetated with a combination of native vegetation and areas of dense
exotic \nuisance vegetation such as lygodium and downy rose myrtle.
iv. Have preserves or acreage requirements for preservation previously been identified for the site
during previous development order approvals? if so, identify the location and acreage of these
preserves, and provide an explanation if they are different from what is proposed.
No, they have not been previously identified.
Environmental lmpaa Statement 02- 13.09 -docx 2$ _..
www.davidsonengineering.com
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 118 of 266
C1E
FMIMPIN
V. For properdes with Special Treatment "ST" overlays, show the ST overlay on the development plan
and provide an explanation as to why these areas are being impacted or preserved.
The NNUMC property is covered by a ST/W -1 overlay. See included zoning map
attached as Rxhihi 9 This Special Treatment overlay refers to Wellfield protection.
The NNUMC MPUD is not proposing any use on the property that is prohibited by
the W -1 Overlay.
E. Wetlands.
Define the number of acres of Collier County jurisdictional wetlands (pursuant to Policy 6.2.1 and
6.2.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan)
according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System ( FLUCCS). Include a
description of each of the FLUCCS categories identified on -site by vegetation type (species),
vegetation composition (canopy, midstory and ground cover) and vegetation dominance (dominant,
common and occasional). Wetland determinations are required to be verified by the South Florida
Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, prior to submission
to the County.
The property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands. A formal wetland
jurisdictional has been completed by the SFWMD. C
ii. Determine seasonal and historic high water levels utilizing lichen lines or other biological indicators.
Indicate how the project design improves /affects predevelopment hydroperiods. Provide a narrative
addressing the anticipated control elevation(s) for the site.
Average natural ground height on the parcel varies from about 10.3 NGVD to 14.2'
NGVD. The project control elevation for the project has not been set by the SFWMD
or Collier County at this point. With the parcel already completely surrounded by
development, it is anticipated the control elevation will be based on adjacent
permitted projects and roads. Without wetlands, there are no biological indicators
on the property to assist in setting the control.
Indicate the proposed percent of defined wetlands to be impacted and the effects of proposed
impacts on the functions of these wetlands. Provide an exhibit showing the location of wetlands to be
impacted and those to be preserved on -site. Describe how impacts to wetlands have been minimized.
N.A. The property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands.
iv. Indicate how the project design compensates for wetland impacts pursuant to the Policies and
Objectives in Goal 6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth
Management Plan. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment, based on the South Florida
Water Management District's Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method that has been accepted by
either the South Florida Water Management District or the Florida Department of Environmental
.......cma, mvacrmaremeuruz 7&U9.dar 26 wwwAavid son engineers ng.com
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
DEPage 119 of 266
rProtection. For sites outside the RFMU district, and where higher quality wetlands are being retained
on -site, provide justification based on the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method,
N.A. The NNUMC property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands.
f. Surface and ground water management
L Provide an overall description of the proposed water management system explaining how it works,
the basis of design, historical drainage flows, off -site flows coming in to the system and how they will
be incorporated in the system or passed around the system, positive outfa0 availability, Wet Season
Water Table and Dry Season Water Table, and how they were determined, and any other pertinent
information pertaining to the control of storm and ground water.
Water Manag m n S,vctem Is s� Description
The following is a description of the proposed water management system:
The project site is located in Section 10, Township 49 S, Range 25 E of Collier County
Florida. The proposed water management system will consist of pre - treatment dry
detention areas and control structures which will discharges into the on -site lake.
The proposed lake will provide the required water quality and attenuation required
per Collier County and SFWMD criteria. The lake will discharge via a control
structure to existing drainage system along Goodlette -Frank Road. The peak
discharge rate from a design storm will be limited to 0.15 cubic feet per second /acre
rate per Collier County Ordinance No. 2001 -27.
The entire site is located within a FEMA zone "XO" with no base floor elevation
specified.
The water management system for the project proposes the construction of a
perimeter berm with a crest elevation set at /or above the 25 year - 3 day peak flood
stage.
if. Provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality
loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses
and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it
exists in its pre- development conditions. This analysis is required for projects impacting five (5) or
more acres of wetlands. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal
and State water quality agencies.
N.A. The NNUMC property does not contain jurisdictional wetlands.
Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM -ST) within the
project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses
within the most sensitive WRM -STS.
The entire NNUMC property is covered by a ST/W -1 overlay. See included zoning
map attached as Exhibit 9. The NNUMC is not proposing any use on property that is
prohibited by the W -1 Overlay.
F.nviromnenial impact Slatemento2-13- 09.docx 27
www. d avi d so n en gi n e eri n g. co m
DE
g. Listed species.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 120 of 266
Provide a plant and animal species survey to include at a minimum, listed species (mown to inhabit
biological communities similar to those existing on -site, and Conducted in accordance with the
guidelines of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service. State actual survey times and dates, and provide a map showing the location(s) of species of
special status identified on-site-
The most recent wildlife survey for the NNUMC property is included as attachment
to this EIS (Exhibit 6). See the protected species survey for specific details. See the
table in item (B.) below for listed species which might reside in habitat similar to
what exists on this property. The "Protected Species Map" in the species survey
details the locations of all listed species actually observed on utilizing the property.
The survey was conducted on the following dates & times:
Date
Start Time
End71me
Hours
Task
October 8 2007
1:00 pro
3:0 m
2
Species Survey
October 9 2007
12:0 m
2:30 m
2.5
Species Survey
October 15,
2007
9:45am
2:15pm
4.5
Species Survey
Total
9
The following ]Lgad species were observed on the property during this survey:
None
Other
None
Mammals
28 unvw.&Md Son engineering.com
DE
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 121 of 266
Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus)
Gopher tortoise burrows were documented on the property.
Nineteen (19) active, ten (10) inactive, and seventeen (17) abandoned gopher
tortoise burrows were documented on the property and flagged in the field. It is
estimated 90 % of potential habitat was surveyed. This results in the following
estimated tortoise density calculations;
19 active + 10 inactive burrows = 29 burrows 0 90% coverage
Estimated 33 active or inactive burrows C@ 100% coverage (29 burrows \0.90)
Estimated burrow occupancy rate of 0.614 for all active and inactive burrows (FWC
criteria)
33 burrows x 0.614 = 20.26 (21) tortoise that may reside on the property, however
the actual number is expected to be lower.
Occupied habitat = 8.61 acres (Naples UE & FLUCCS 832 & FLUCCS 320
communities)
Therefore, tortoise density on the property is approximately 2.44 tortoise per acre
(21 tortoise \8.61 acres of occupied habitat)
rP
An offsite relocation permit from the FWC was received and the tortoise on the
property have been relocated to the City Gate recipient site in the northern Picayune
Strand State Forest All burrows on the property were excavated on July 301, 31+;
and August 1s' by Jeremy Sterk of Davidson Engineering and Ray Ashton of the
Ashton Biodiversity Organization. A total of 12 tortoise were excavated from the
property and relocated to the approved recipient site. It appeared that individual
tortoise on the NNUMC property were utilizing more than one burrow; this would
explain the low density based on the number of burrows excavated. Field data
sheets and appropriate information were forwarded to the FWC after completion of
the relocation.
Several common wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata) were observed in trees on the
parcel.
ii. Identify all listed species that are known to inhabit biological communities similar to those
existing on the site or that have been directly observed on the site.
Potential protected species list for the NNUMC parcel according to FLUCCS category;
Envlronmemal impact Statement 02Q3-09.doax 29 �
www.d avi d so nenghieeri ng.co m
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 122 of 266
DIE
RNYl1>'ARM
FLUCCS
Potential Listed Species
Scientific Name
Desigannated Status
FWCorFDA
I FWS
320 &
Audubon's Crested Caracara
Potyborusplancusaudubonif
T
T
329H
Beautiful Pawpaw
Deeringothamnuspulchellus
E
E
Burrowing Owl
Speotyto cunicularia
SSC
Curtis Milkweed
Asdepias arrtfssit
E
Fakahatrhee Burmannia
Burmannia flaw
E
Florida Black Bear
Ursus americans floridanus
T
Florida Coontie
Zamia ftoridana
C
Florida Sandhill Crane
Gruscanadenstspratensis
T
Gopher Prog
Rana eaptto
SSC
Gopher Tortoise
Gopheruspowphemus
SSC
Eastern Indigo Snake
Drymarrhon corals coupert
T
T
Southeastern American
Kestrel
Falco sparvertus paulus
T
4169
Beautiful Pawpaw
Deeringothamnus pulchellus
E
E
Big Cypress Fox Squirrel
Sdurus niger avicennla
T
Eastern Indigo Snake
Drymarchon corals roupert
T
T
Fakahatrhee Burmannia
Burmannia flaw
E
Florida Black Bear
Ursus americam is fiortdanus
T
Florida Coontie
Zamlafloridana
C
Florida Panther
Fe/lsconcolorcnryt
E
E
Gopher Frog
Rana capita
SSC
Gopher Tortoise
Gopherus polyphemus
SSC
Red- Cockaded Woodpecker
Ptroidesborealis
T
E
Satinleaf
Chrysophyllum olivtforme
E
Southeastern American
Falco sparverius paulus
T
Kestrel
Twisted Air Plant
7Y11andsiaflexousa
E
424
NONE
832
NONE
Abbreviations:
FWC= Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
FDA = Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
USFWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Statue
E= Endangered
T =Threatened
T(S /A)= Threatened /Similarity of Appearance
SSC = Species of Special Concern
iii. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to species of special status.
GOPHER TORTOISE: NNUMC intends to manage the small population of gopher
tortoise through ofisite relocation to a recipient site in the northern Picayune Strand
State Forest. The gopher tortoise relocation permit from the FWC is attached as
Exhibit 8.
Environmental Impact Star ement 02- 1309.docx 30 www.d avid sonengineering.coin
k
C
C
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 123 of 266
DE
CPN ONDI,TMO
A
An offsite relocation permit from the FWC was received and the tortoise on the
property have been relocated to the City Gate recipient site in the northern Picayune
Strand State Forest All burrows on the property were excavated on July 30d, 31n
and August 1st by Jeremy Sterk of Davidson Engineering and Ray Ashton of the
Ashton Biodiversity Organization. A total of 12 tortoise were excavated from the
property and relocated to the approved recipient site. It appeared that individual
tortoise on the NNUMC property were utilizing more than one burrow; this would
explain the low density based on the number of burrows excavated. Field data
sheets and appropriate information were forwarded to the FWC after completion of
the relocation.
iv. Provide habitat management plans for each of the listed species (mown to occur on the property. For
sites with bald eagle nests and /or nest protection zones, bald eagle management plans are required, copies of
which shall be included as exhibits attached to the PUD documents, where applicable.
EASTERN INDIGO SNA F.: NNUMC will adhere to the USFWS's "Standard Protection
Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake ". A cony of the protection mranures, is
included as Exhibit 11 As part of the protection measures an informational sign has
been made for posting on the NNUMC property prior to and during construction
activities. A cony of copy is alco included in Fxhibi 7 Per the Standard
Protection Measures, the sign will be submitted to the USFWS for approval at least
30 days prior to clearing activities on the property.
GOPHER TORTME. NNUMC intends to manage the small population of gopher
tortoise through offsite relocation to a recipient site in the northern Picayune Strand
State Forest The gopher tortoise relocation permit from the FWC is attached as
Exhibit 8.
pDAT .:
An offsite relocation permit from the FWC was received and the tortoise on the
property have been relocated to the City Gate recipient site in the northern Picayune
Strand State Forest All burrows on the property were excavated on July 30t, 31st
and August 1st by Jeremy Sterk of Davidson Engineering and Ray Ashton of the
Ashton Biodiversity Organization. A total of 12 tortoise were excavated from the
property and relocated to the approved recipient site. It appeared that individual
tortoise on the NNUMC property were utilizing more than one burrow; this would
explain the low density based on the number of burrows excavated. Field data
sheets and appropriate information were forwarded to the FWC after completion of
the relocation.
LISTED PLANTS: The site does contain wild pine (Tillandsia fascfcu1nk). Prior to
clearing (during the pre - construction fox squirrel survey) the site will be re-
surveyed for Tillandsia and other listed epiphytic plants such as Florida But±erflv
�.. 0rcb1ds (Encycha tampensis). Any individuals observed during the survey that can
be reasonably reached will be relocated to the indigenous preserve.
Environmental Impact Statement OL73 09.dop 31 www.davidsonengineering.com
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 124 of 266
DG
pA Rso.M.
V. Where applicable, include correspondence received from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), with regards to the project
Explain how the concerns of these agencies have been met
The gopher tortoise relocation permit from the FWC is attached as Exhibit 8.
h. Other.
i. For multi-slip docidng facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the
project is consistent with the marina siting and other criteria in the Manatee Protection Plan. ii.
Include the results of any environmental assessments and /or audits of the property. If applicable,
provide a narrative of the cost and measures needed to clean up the site.
Not Applicable. The project is not located adjacent to the Gulf of Mexico.
iii. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern- Special Treatment (ACSC -ST)
overlay district, show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations
established for the ACSC -ST.
Not Applicable. The project is not located within the Big Cypress Area of Critical
State Concern.
iv. Soil sampling or ground water monitoring reports and programs shall be required for sites that
occupy old farm fields, old golf courses or for which there is a reasonable basis for believing that
there has been previous contamination on site. The amount of sampling and testing shall be
determined by the Environmental Services staff along with the Pollution Control Department and the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
The subject property was historically used for agriculture, but has been abandoned
long enough for the site to completely re- vegetate with (mostly) native vegetation.
A phase 1 environmental audit was completed on the original parent parcel to this
property in December of 2000 by Environmental Risk Management, Inc (ERMI). The
parent parcel was 43 acres and included the NNUMC parcel and currently developed
property to the south. ERMI concluded "Based on the results of this investigation,
no further action is considered necessary to investigate the environmental quality of
the subject property." A copy of the report is included as Exhibit 10.
Provide documentation from the Florida Master Site File, Florida Department of State and any
printed historic archaeological surveys that have been conducted on the project area. Locate any
known historic or archaeological sites and their relationships to the proposed project design.
Demonstrate how the project design preserves the historic /archaeological integrity of the site.
No historical or archaeological surveys have been conducted on the subject
property; however, a letter was submitted to the Division of Historical Resources
requesting that they review the Florida Master Site File. A response was received
that states no historical properties or significant historical resources are expected
on the property. See attached letter as Exhibit 11 -
Environmental impact Statement 02- 13-09.dmm 32 www.davidsonengineering.com
EXHIBIT 1
r
RESUME
C-
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 125 of 266
DIE
DAVIDSON
ENGINEERING
Jeremy C. Sterk
Education
St. Cloud State University, B.S., Magna Cmu Laude, Aquatic Biology, 1994,
Professional Affiliations
Florida Association of Environmental Professionals
Work Hiatory
September 2007 to Present
Director of Environmental Services\ Project Manager
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
Naples, Florida
December 2002 to September 2007
Environmental Consultant \ Land Planning Consultant
Hoover Planting & Development, Inc.
Naples, Florida
September 1994 to December 1002
Environmental Consultant
Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Pt. Myers, Florida
Professional
• Vegetation & Habitat Mapping
• Environmental Assessments
• Protected Species Surveys (PSS)
• Species Management Plans
• Wetland Assessments \ Delineation
• Wetland Jurisdictional Determinations
• Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
• Post Permit Compliance
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 126 of 266
• GIS / CPS Mapping
• Environmental Resource Permitting (ERE)
• Envirmmmtal Land Use Planning
• Bald Eagle Monitoring
• Native Vegetation Restoration Plana
• Gopher Tortoise Permitting UWocations
• Incidental Take Permitting
Experience in Lee, Collier, Gbarlottq Glades, DeSoto, and Hendry Counties.
Other Professional ExMiences
1994. Wrote & published commercial computer sottwere fm the rapid identification of freshwater algae, Computer
Assisted Algal Recognition (CAAR).
1996. Headed a field research project using telemetry t caking to study the swimming speed of lemon sharks in the
Bahamas.
1998, Wrote an ecological assessment computer model for the South Florida Water Management District u pert of the
South Les County Watershed Study.
Publications
Sundstram, L.F., J. Sterk, & S.H. Gruber. 1998. Ef octs of a speed -sensing transmitter on the swimming speed of lemon
sharks. Bahamas J. Sci. 6 (1): 12 -22.
3530 Krell Road, Suite #301 • Naples, Florida 34105 • Phone: 239.434.6060 • Fax: 239.434.6084
www.davidsononainaarina.com
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
EXHIBIT 2
C
AERIAL
c
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 127 of 266
Aganda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 128 of 266
EXHIBIT 3
MASTER CONCEPT PLAN
DRAINAGE CONCEPT
PLAN
k
c
C
I f ill 1 1if
� $ y�
Ill ,tlg $m ppppgg y mmpppp R
I� s Il49 m 4 �44H a 4 x Y® E
• �k • � " � � �°� p � 4RWq_ a e 4� � 9 ei
9 i
_ fill
�I I INN � a g 111 112
*
U
�I.YIf1iYMMY1pIMli® ay
6 Z_
=rr
og10
• ► •;� WE
' � I
r
i'YW i0I¢ WYMl�'IILL�I
41 W I R1III11Y1O161�1�3
V
I? s
ag
=¢�pSiSi
=V
3 -1
wi
will
vo
INK
WE
al
y
T
F046
dug
MIgS
a
:a
S
O
Z
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 131 of 266
EXHIBIT 4
r
FORMAL WETLAND
DETERMINATION
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 132 of 266
,tv
August 14, 2008
North Naples United Methodist Church
9000 Doodietto Road
Naples, FL 34109
MIG I- fs zft
Sub0ft Petition for Formal Detanninayon of Watfands and &af "Waters
Application No. 080818.16, North Naples United MWwdlat Church
Confer County, siW498NME
Enclosed is a copy of the District's Intended agwW action regarding Your petition for a fomud
wedand(surface water determination. it is requested that you read this intended agency action
thoroughy and understand its contents. The Dish" will publish it$ nodoe of intended agency action In a
to Clark general circulation
Director petition
atom an � firing bl limey tied with
with the Intended agency action. You w8 receive notification to final action.
� �DO�n`�
Should you wish to object to the intended agency action, you must file a petition in conformance with
Rule 40E- 1.521, Florida Adminiatratlye Code (attach).
Eltz"t Vegulk Deputy Clark
South Florida Wa1w ldanagernant District
Post Oifios Box 24980
Walt Palm Beach, Ronda 33419 -4990
The attached 'Notice of Rights' addressee your rights under Florida law should you Wish to corrtsst the
Intended agency action. However the referenced 'Noticed of Rghts' should not be used as
smav x oofe dorrnat if - T � wMesd of your legal rights, You should seek lapel counsel. your
You hwe any quesdone concerning thfa protases.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a "Notice of Rights' has been naafisd to the addressee and the persons listed in
the attached dis4'mation Iles no later than 5;00 p.m. this 140 day of August, 2008,
Deputy Director
Regulation Department
AW/dr
CERTIFIED MAIL 7006 2790 0Do4 3191 9409
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
330] Gun Qub Bond. Wet Psam Bead,, Flo6ida 39406 • (561) 666 800 • PL WAIT; 1-800-432-204'.;
Maftg Addles: P.O. Box 246M Wed Palm Beaeh, pL 346164660 t�aVKafwmd.gov
A
C
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 133 of 266
As equhsd by Sodom 120.589(1), and 120.80(3), Fta Stet, following is rotiw of the opporkmdties which
may be avalllabla for admhWMlve hearing or pdkdal review when to aftiarlai Interests of a party are
dabmdned by an opency. Please nob fiat bb Noft of Riphds Is not kdended b provide legal advice.
Not all fie lapel prooeeftp detailed below may be an applicable or eppmpliaee nmody. You may wish loo
camamk an atbmay m pWkg !roar lapel rights.
RIGHT TO REfGJEt3T ADI MWMTIVE HEARING
A person whose rAollamfld Ind am or may be affeded by the Soufi Fbrtda Walla Maepamw t
DMWv (SFWMD or Dbbt t) Will has No NM to request an alh*W *, a hearing on 1W action
Mm ad b Sodom 120SO and 120.571 FN. Seat Persona on" a haskV an a DWM dedelon
which does or may deill fielr s kstardial krbreeb chap file a paeift for hearknp will the Dil Clark
wft 21 days of mosipt of w rillan ndNre of fie dedabn, unless one of fie ftGoW1% shorim time periods
apply: 1) w4thin 14 days of the noble of aormoBdeYad kbnt b graft or deny corwrm* reviowed
applia dorm for snvhonnmnW roomers pamYls and use of smersign aubmerped lade putmexed b Sedlon
378. 427, Fla Stet; or 2) vrlldrr 14 days of saNce of an Order pmeauad b Subsection
373.119(1), Fls. Slat. •ReoW of rrtNten nolke d agawy dedolon• mom rsosipt of eifiar wdMian notice
11=0 mall, or ebdimb mall, or po ft fiat in DWM has or kmisnda b tape *ball sgauy ad w, or
publication of notice that Uma Dbbid has or intends b take &W ap nq adbn. My person who nosh m
wrNbn m *9 of a SFWMD dababn and fah b ft a whim request for haft wWM the ftshams
described above wdm No rphd b mgtmd a heemt on that dedalon.
Itbd wi h ow t)flae of fie Dbtdd Clerk of to SF1AM a FRrrgs w ih the Dioll t Ciak
may be made by md, ha xWelvay or fasknle, Fkkv by wary will cot be accopMd. Any prison
wfeft b mceft a daked copy wGm the date and lme dumped mud Moulds an addilael copy. A normal business ham by to Didd
C�ek at headgwrists In Wisat Palm Beads, Ftorkta. � dacumord remW by the olbcm of ft
SFWMD Cork albr 5.:00 p.m. shell be fled as of 8:00 am. on the need cedar WjWn 6 day. Additkmel
Ili% kmlruclom we as blows:
Fill by mall must be addnweed to she OIICe of the SFWMD Clerk, P.O. Box 24880, Wed Palm
!leach, Florida 33416.
Fftp by hard- lelvery must be d* MW b go ONO of to SFWMD Clerk. DsNvny of a
P' Nmn t to #0 BF VM socu ty desk doss app Comma& fill To saame pvpr 1N111l It
wr1111 be meonauy to rogwd Ws BFYIWa somMly ofawr to Comet Vw CWk'e alike. M
employee of fie WMAVs Mft dice wig fwWo and Ile the pelI
Ftlnpa by fasktrle must be kammilled b Ne SFWMD CWk's Oltics d (581) 682.8010. Pursuant
b &beclorm X108.1049 (8) and (9), Fla. A&*. Code, a party who Ilea a docrmord by
fs�trnde cspreserde !het lm algae! physloely abrod docxrrnmerd wBl be mraleked by fiat paty for
is durAn of fiat pmxreadng and of any ambl a pW appeal or subsequem pnx m ft in that
Came. Any party who dada to Nla my document by bc*de shall be mapofsibie br any delay,
dbrWft or InbmWfion of Nre ebcbonb apnea amt accepts the ful rbk fiat fit doc tim mt may
mot be properly Gad w RtI the Clerk es a nerd!. The MV dale for a dom mamt lliod by facet mils shill
be the dais the SFWMD Clerk re Ovse the axnmpiala docmmnerd.
CRev. 1431W
Agenda Item No. I 7C
July 27. 2010
Page 134 of 266
IrModon of an Adndribbative Hearing `,,,
Pursuant b Rides 28106. 1 and 28 106301, Fla. Admin. Cade, bVion of an administrative hearing
shd be made by *span POM b the SFWMD h IeglWe form and an 4 sod 1n by 11 inch whits psper.
A! PetBone she! contain:
1. IderAc edw of 90 &Am bsirg eordNW. hd dno the permit number, appkom number,
District file number or any other SFWMD idwac atim number, f brown.
2. The raane, address ad taispfione number of Us Mttione , ad pWknWs repressntetve, if any.
3. An egMndm of how the petfloWs pbdel td intaute will be affected by the agency
dam.
4. A statement of when end how the peetuner recatvad nolt:e orthe SFVI mvs decistun.
S. A sh 6mW of al disputed issues of material tact. if there are none, the petltlon must no Indicate.
6. A concise sI iernI I of the ultmais fads staged, kdudkg the speclk fads tie petlaner
contends warrant reversal or modification of the SFWMDi proposed aotlmh.
7. A statement of the epsdtc rules or alehrtes the petioner coniande require re erset or maditeibn
of the SFNM Ys proposed action.
8. t disputed issues of materiel feet axial, to statement must Ww In dude an explanation of how ft
defied lards raw to the spedtc ruin or etw*&
9. A steiemsert of the retaf sought by th pdfloner, sts" p Kb* the &coon the pettoaer wig"
the SFWMD ID take wNtr rasped b the SFWMVo proposed scion.
A Parson may fie a request for an weiendon of time for ling a peftn. The SFMO may, for good cause,
W the repalL Reghreste for extenelon of tine mist be fled whh the SFWMD prior b the deadline for
tong a Patton for hassIr g. Such requests for axiension and cwAWn a cs Mmb Uut ills moving Party has
croneulted wth d other pwfoa conamrdng the ade don and that pre SFWMD and any other patties agree
b or oppose b IN mdenefon. A tmey request ter erderwon of time War bill the running of fire tnre period
br 64 a PaOM anti the naqueet is acted upon.
9 intended Gaverni g Board telres sedan verb mbelantely dpiue d hrrpacis on +rater resource® from
agency dedslon, the persona who may be ndaraentaly atfecied BW here an
addllional Print of entry pimus t b Rule 28 106. 111, Ra Admin. Code, unless otherwise provided by law.
Ned won
Thar Prwadwee for pursrdng meddm are set fodh in Sedim 12DAM, Fla. W. and Riles 28106.111
and 28106.401 -.406, Fla Admin. Code. The SFWMD to not preparing mediation for his agency atimx
wKiar• Sectlon 120.678, Fie. Stet, at Qds time.
ROfr M 9®CJUDK IAL REVIEW
Pmuk b Sedm 12DMP) ad 12D.68. Fla. Stet.. a pargr who te advaraay affeded by i6ul SFWMD aclon
mff seek o t W mw w of fie SFWidds teal ftcW n by ftrg a natoe of appeal punsumd b laexida Ruled
Appalete Pm mkn 9.110 in the Fourth D*d tout of Appel or in the appellate d *b whae a party
Maidee
SFWMD a� a second copy of the notice INM fie W MD flak within 30 days of randakg of the *W
RM. t0191W 2
srp_ ozfl reportxff
r
Last Data For Agency Action: 21-SEP -08
INDMDUAL FORMAL WETLAND DETERMINATION STAFF REPORT
Project Name: North Naples United Methodist Chum -Formal Wetland Detenn
Permit M&: 11 -00011 -F
ApplicnUon No.: 080318 -15
AppNoedon Type: Now Formal Wetland Detannination
Locadon: Collier County, S101T49SAi25E
Appliaant: North Naples United Methodist Church
Project Area: 13.09 acre s
Projaat Land Use: Welland Determination
40OW Drainage Dlstrlet: NA
Conservation Easement To Dhdit : No
Sovsrslgn Submerged Lsruls: No
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 135 of 266
SGT ROBE:
This appticallon Is a request for a formal detenni wdon of the boundary of wetlands and othv surface
webers, pursuant to subsection 40E -4.042 Florida Administrative Code (FAC.), for a 13.09 eve parcel
Irloroxm as North Naples United Methodist Church.
ILMRno•: 0=1 8-15 Popp of
srP_8ke8 reportAf
PROJECT 0 ALUATION:
PROJECT SITE OE$CRIPTION:
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 136 of 266
The w-d4od property sncompesasd approxknalely +/_ 13.09 acres and is located north of Pine Ridge
Road. met of US 41, and on the east side of Good ethq+renk Road in CO MW Courtly, Napbs, Florida
A location map is onsched as exhibit 1.0.
The sub)ad Property Is 100% uplands. The natural upland corrrrsrrity is disturbed with 90% exotic
spades• The uplands are comPHsod of Palmetho, Brazilian Pepper, meldeuca, and Slash pins with a
graminold understcry that Is dcralrretsd by 90% coverage of Lygodlum mlcrophyk m (Ohl World Climbing
Fam).
On March 18. 20011 the DteM recehad s request for formal detannhrgtion of wetlands located within the
subject Property. A Held inspection Was conducted on May 21, 2008 by Jaramy Stark of Davidson
Enpinoerinp, Ina, and by Holly L Bauer-Windtorst, Envi ormnant d Analyst IN, of the Lower West Coast
Regulation DlvbkvL The methodologies ughed to dokm to wetlands and surface waters were
consistent with 82 -340, FAC. and 373.421 (2), F.S. There have been no pem tb Issued mgardhng this
site.
Wetland Description:
There are no on -site wetlands for this 13.09 sore Sib. The nay of the ana, spproxdmalaly 8.98 acres,
Is mainly shrub and brurehlend. ExOtIcs Inducts 90% cwAngs of Lygodlum rrdc ropi Nuttt (Old WoHd
Ct"Ing Fero), and 76% Brazilian pepper and melaisrrw. A 1.88 acre Florida Power and Light (FPL)
eawms"t eatets to the wart Of the property, which Is a mowed and makdah W upland of pramhrold
gmwdcover,
The of Is bordered by Goodetie•Frank Road to the west, a comntadcal development m the south, and
and a religious Institution and school to the east and raft A drainage easement exists along the
eestatds of the property; howomr, this Is located molds Or the boundary tine.
SOIL TYPES AND HYDROLOGICAL INDICATORS:
There were no hydroglcal Indicators present on this albs, According to the NRCS Son Survey
Courtly, the oft has only one sON nontr of Collier
We. This sit b NRCS 7, Imnrdmbs Fine Sand, end b nonhydric.
WETLAND DELINEATION:
Based on the sits via@ and other alte ktfOrn "On, this 13.09 eve site does not contain wolwm* or. other
suriece waters and don not most the criteria for a Welland or Olhsr surface waters as dellned by Chapter
62-340 Florida A Wnialrabtre Coda (FAQ), the Basis Of Rm" (S.O.R.) 4.52 (a), Chapter 373.421(2),
Florida Sbudutes (F.S.). The red One on the attached serial Is the surveyed property boundary. The areas
denoted with the yellow lines are the upland boundaries and ere capable of being msthanadcally
APp•m.: 080.916.16
Peas 2 or 4
vi
erp_stsfr_report.(df
e
Agenda item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 137 of 266
An uplands description map (FLUCCS) is atrattfed u exhibit 2.0.
An aerial photograph overlayed with uPFend description and showing the direction of the waterflow Is
attached as exhibit 2.1.
A soils map is attached as exhibit 3.0.
Appns.: 09031 &ta Pans 3 sf4
Agenda Item No. 17C
uly 27, 2010
crp_siaff _ieport.rdl i Page 138 of 266
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Staff recomrnands that the following be issued
A formal determination of the extant of wetlands and other surface waters, Pursuant to subsection 40E-
4.042 FAC., for a 13.09 arse parcel known as North Naples United Methodist Church.
Based on the information provided, District ruses have been adhered to.
Staff reoormendation Is for approval subject to the attached
$Pedal Conditions.
NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT APPROVAL
��.�1:'�
ENVRtO11NMHNTAL RESOURCE PERM11TTI G DMSIOd DRtECTOR : R b
/tR B /.J /�
Anita Bain DATE: a
App.no.: 09081 8-15 Paga 4 of 4
A
5
v
Qz
V
P�
,g
V
m
0
�g
a
P1 I
fill �b a
M,-40.1 1i
I
V7
!!"�P,
A
iR M2 `rp`
a
PhD p4p
iMR�2
ru
a
ilia
Z
Agenda Item No. 17C
July an 27, 2010
Dq"p t of ?rr
I
Exhibit 2.0
APPH=tion No. 080318 -15
Page 1 of 1
m C
T
Q
IN A. i
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 141 of 266
Exhibit
Application No.
Page
2.1
080518 -15
1 of 2
m
-4 1
11
P
4
s
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 141 of 266
Exhibit
Application No.
Page
2.1
080518 -15
1 of 2
yl
�e,
!`
fin.
I -,.�
xa�'`::�
r
�-,
;'
_.:..'
4•
.
( i a
4
�-..
� r;
i
:'c' �..:
St v
I
�+
�
�".tT� ^ar� +�
.�Sq.
��
—
..
�
;h 4t.
.w .,
q ^IY' S
. .!p y.w .� ri
� �
4. 1.
.•T 4
M1
�l .A if }.�
..
— f
��,Y � �
r � ;-+�
,.r
�
�r
M V .�� t
G�
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 144 of 266
STAFF REPORT DISTRIBUTION UST
NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - FORMAL WETLAND DETERM
Application No: 080318 -15
Permit: No•. 11-00011 -F
INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION
X H*L Sauer- WkMhont -2261
X Laura Layman - 4270
X J. Golden -4210
X Pemdt Fos
GOVERNING BOARD MEMBERS
- Mr. Charles J Dauray,
- Mr. Etc Suaffnem
Mr. Michael Collins
- W. Patrick Rooney. Jr.
- Mr. Paul C Huck, Jr.
- Mr. Robert Montgomery
- Me. Madese Meeker
- Me. Shannon A. Estenoz
EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION
X Pemetlee - North Naples Unitsd Methodist Church
X Agent - Davidson Engineering Ino
GOVERNMENT gOENC1ES
X Copier County Property Appralaer
X FDEP, Eric Hickman En*mmanlal Adminlshall
1
C
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 145 of 266
EXHIBIT 5
C PRESERVE MANAGEMENT
PLAN
C-
Agenda Item No. 17C
.July 27, 2010
Page 146 of 266
DOE
DAVIDSON I
NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
Preserve Management Plan
PRESERVE MANAGEMENT
The follow activities will be performed on the property to ensure long term health of preserves
within the project:
Installation of protective barriers and signage, All protective barriers shall be installed and
maintained for the period of time beginning with the commencement of any phase of land
clearing or building operations and aiding with the completion of that phase of the construction
work on the site, unless otherwise approved to be removed by the development services
director's field representative. All protective barriers shall be installed pursuant to the Tree
Protection Manual for Builders and Developers, division of forestry, State of Florida or other
methods approved by the Development services director. Signage shall be placed around the
preserve areas to identify and protect the preserve during construction. The boundary of the
Preserve shall be posted with appropriate signage denoting the area as a Preserve. Sign(s) should
note that the posted area is a protected area. The signs shall be no closer than ten feet from
residential property lines; be limited to a maximum height of four feet and a maximum size of
two square feet; and otherwise comply with Section 2.5.6. Maximum sign spacing shall be 300
feet.
Exotic Vegetation Removal, Non -native Vegetation, and Nuisance or Invasive Plant
Control All preserves, open space areas, and undeveloped portions of the property will be
walked and all Category 1 exotic and nuisance plants, and prohibited exotics as defined by the
LDC, shall be killed These plants will be killed in a manner consistent with current exotic and
nuisance plant removal practices while ensuring that neighboring plants are left unharmed and
the soil left as undisturbed as possible. All non -native vegetation will be removed from
Preserves.
All Category I Exotics shall be killed in all preserves. All exotics within every preserve shall be
Physically removed, or the tree cut down to grade and the stump treated. The stump shall be
treated with an U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved herbicide and a visual tracer
dye shall be applied.
The removal method may not involve mechanical removal, whereby machinery is used to
remove the exotics.
Annual Maintenance. All preserves, open space areas, and undeveloped portions of the
property will be walked and inspected at least once yearly for the presence of exotic vegetation.
Exotic vegetation will be maintained at zero percent cover. The maintenance program will be
conducted in Rerloetui ty.
3530 Kraft Road, Sulte #301 • Naples, Florida 34105 • Phone: 239.434.6060 • Fax: 239.434.6064
www.davidsonenal nee rinp cam \
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 147 of 266
OW General Maintenance. Preserves shall be maintained in their natural state and must be kept free
of refuse and debris.
Monitoring. An annual monitoring report will be provided to Collier County for 1 year
documenting the exotic removal activities and overall preserve health. The monitoring will be
according to the approved Collier County plan as part of the project's approved Site
Development Plan
Designation of a Preserve Manager. A Preserve Manager shall be identified to assist the
developer in ensuring the Preserve Management Plan is being complied with. The developer
shall also be identified. The developer\property owner shall be responsible for annual
maintenance of the preserve, in perpetuity.
Preserve Manager:
Jeremy Sterk
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301
Naples, FL 34105
Developer:
North Naples United Methodist Church (NNUMC)
6000 Goodlette Road
Naples, FL 34109
Wildlife Habitat Management Gopher tortoise present on the property were relocated to an
offsite recipient parcel according to FWC criteria. No further wildlife management is proposed.
Allowable Uses Within Preserve Areas. Passive recreational uses such as pervious nature trails
or boardwalks are allowed within the preserve areas, as long as any clearing required to facilitate
these uses does not impact the minimum required vegetation, and is approved by the County.
For the purpose of this section, passive recreational uses are those uses that would allow limited
access to the preserve in a manner that will not cause any negative impacts to the preserve, such
as pervious pathways, benches and educational signs are permitted in the preserve. Fences may
be utilized outside of the preserves to provide protection in the preserves in accordance with the
protected species section of the LDC. Fences and walls are not permitted within the preserve
area.
INSPECTIONS SHALL BE RQUIRED FOR ALL PRESERVES. The preserve areas shall
be inspected in accordance with the following schedule:
• Prior to preliminary acceptance of the phase of the required subdivision improvements;
• Within the associated phase of the final site development plan prior to the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 148 of 266
EX�IIBIT 6
SPECIES SURVEY ]
F
DE
DAVIDSON
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 149 of 266
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY (PSS)
Project: NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
REZONE PARCEL
SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST
APPROXIMATELY 13.09 ACRES
Presented to: COLLIER COUNTY
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FL 34104
Dated: November 1, 2007
Revised:
3830 Kraft Road, Suke 9301 • Naples, Florida 34105 • Phone: 239.434.6060 • Fax: 239A34.6084
www.davidaonenaInesrina.com
Davidson Engineering, Inc.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
NORTH NAPLES UNUED METHODIST CBURCH{Nt 66
Protected Species Survey
Page 2
INTRODUCTION I
The purpose of this report is to detail results of a recent protected species survey by personnel
from Davidson Engineering, Inc.
LOCATION
The North Naples United Methodist Church parcel is located immediately east of Goodlette-
Frank Road, approximately/ mile north of Pine Ridge Road in Section 10 Township 49 South,
Range 25 East, in Collier County, Florida See attached location map, The parcel totals
approximately 13.09 acres.
SPECIES SURVEY MATERIALS & METHODS
The species survey was conducted using a methodology similar to that discussed in the Florida
Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) publication "Ecology and Habitat Protection
Needs of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Populations Found on Lands Slated for
Large -scale Development in Florida" This methodology is as follows: Existing vegetation
communities or land -uses on the subject site are delineated on a recent aerial photograph (Collier
County 2007) using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System ( FLUCCS).
Then the resulting FLUCCS codes are cross - referenced with lists of protected plant and animal
species. The lists were obtained from two agency publications.
A list of animals and birds was obtained from the FWC publication "Florida's Endangered
Species, Threatened Species & Species:of Special Concem- Official Lists ", Publication Date:
January 29, 2004.
A list of protected plant species was obtained from the publication "Notes on Florida's
Endangered and Threatened Plants ", Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services,
Division of Plant Industry, Bureau of Entomology, Nematology & Plant Pathology- Botany
Section, Contribution 38, 0 Edition- 2003).
The result is a composite table that contains the names of the protected species which have the
highest probability of occurring in each particular FLUCCS community. See Table 1 of this
report for the species list that applies to this property.
In the field, each FLUCCS community is searched for listed species or signs of listed species.
This is accomplished using a series of tramects throughout each vegetation community. If
necessary, transect integrity is maintained using a handheld GPS in track mode.
Signs or sightings of all listed and non -listed species are then recorded. Listed species locations
are typically flagged and marked by GPS.
Based on the habitat types found on this parcel of land, particular attention was paid to the
presence or absence of gopher tortoise.
�.J
L"AO&-hgimsWWd Nqb UOved MNyyyq -I2 eve MD. ffi-W . ___ _ enact 5,. 8v,ry
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
NORTH NAPLES UNMM METHODIST CHURCCtp(RNLJ&)266
Protected. Species Survey
Page 3
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
Temperatures during the fieldwork for this survey were in the upper 80's to low 90's. Cloud
cover varied from partly cloudy to full sun. Approximately 9 man -hours were logged on the
property during the species survey. Table 3 details dates and times spent in the field.
The 13.09 acre NNUMC property is surrounded by development on 4 sides, which include the
following surrounding land uses:
West Goodlette -Frank Road ROW
North Existing North Naples United Methodist Church Property
South Panther Lane Professional Office Development
East Collier County Public School (Pine Ridge Middle School)
Listed below are the FLUCCS communities identified on the site. The following community
descriptions correspond to the mappings on the attached FLUCCS map. See Florida Land Use,
Cover and Forms Classification System (Department of Transportation, Surveying & Mapping
Geographic Mapping Section, 1999) for definitions. Specific vegetation present is further
detailed in Table 4.
Shrub & Brushl=4 FLUCCS 320, 6.39 Acres
This community makes up the majority of the property and is dominated by widely
scattered live oak in the canopy along with occasional slash pine. In most areas of this
community the canopy is nearly absent but densities of live oak increase towards the
southern portion of the property. In most cases the live oaks are larger specimen trees.
Midstory includes scattered saw palmetto, mytsine, wax myrtle, earleaf acacia, Brazilian
pepper, rusty lyonia, buckthorn, and occasional dense areas of downy rose myrtle. Other
vegetation present includes grapevine, runner oak, love vine, winged sumac, penny royal,
prickly pear, poison ivy, Caesar's weed, and smilax.
This community is dominated by melaleuca and widely scattered live oak in the canopy.
Midstory includes often extremely dense downy rose myrtle and scattered palmetto.
Most of this community has been overwhelmed by exotic and nuisance vegetation. These
areas contain lygodium microphylltmt (old world climbing fern) is such densities that it
has formed waist high "mats" that have engulfed the entire groundeover and begun to run
up all trees. Other vegetation present includes java plum, Brazilian pepper, scattered
swamp fern, bracken fem, smilax, and grapevine.
Pine Flatwoods- Graminoid Understory Exotic Invaded FLUCCS 416E 0 60 Acres
This community is found in two pockets in the northeast comer of the site. Canopy is
dominated by melaleuca and scattered slash pine. Midstory includes downy rose myrtle,
Brazilian pepper, myrsine, and java plum. Groundcover is often dominated by dense
lygodium microphyllwn (old world climbing fern), but also includes grapevine, bracken
fern, and smilax.
zu� neircnv�wmmNgae, vrnMamain- �x e� nIDre m oe- ov3�ewo�.nesswaeme sv� s�,,.y.e�
Agenda Item No, 17C
NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHUR I' ly ?7' 9p i 0
Q66
Protected Species Survey
Page 4
Melaleuea, FLUCCS 424 119 Acres I
Canopy vegetation is dominated by melaleuca in densities greater flan 75 %. Midstory is
also dominated by melaleuca. Groundcover is dominated by a dense carpet of Lygodium,
Other vegetation present includes Caesar's weed, grapevine, and smilax,
FPL Easement & Goodlette Frank ROW FLUCCS 832 186 Acres
This community makes up the western boundary of the property. It includes a portion of
Goodlette -Frank road and a Florida Power and Light (FPL) utility easement. The FPL
easement is dominated by saw palmetto. Other vegetation present includes rusty lyonia,
runner oak, grapevine, buckthorn, winged sumac, poison ivy, and pennyroyal.
City ofNrmles Utility Easement 0.3 6 Acres
This portion of the property is encumbered by a City of Naples Utility Easement.
Vegetation present includes scattered oak, saw palmetto, rusty lyonia, runner oak,
grapevine, buckthorn, winged sumac, poison ivy, and pennyroyal.
RESULTS\ DISCUSSION
The various protected species which may occur in the corresponding FLUCCS communities are
shown in Table 1.
All animal species observed on the subject parcel are detailed in Table 2. Within Table 2, any ,
protected species observed are specifically noted
See attached drawing entitled "North Naples United Methodist Church— Protected Species
Survey" for representative survey trausects and approximate listed species observation locations.
Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemusl
Gopher tortoise burrows were documented on the property.
Nineteen (19) active, ten (10) inactive, and seventeen (17) abandoned gopher tortoise burrows
were documented on the property and flagged in the field It is estimated 90 % of potential
habitat was surveyed. This results in the following estimated tortoise density calculations:
19 active + 10 inactive burrows = 29 burrows @ 900/9 coverage
Estimated 33 active or inactive burrows @ 100% coverage (29 burrows \0.90)
Estimated burrow occupancy rate of 0.614 for all active and inactive burrows (FWC criteria)
33 burrows x 0.614 = 20.26 (2 1) tortoise that may reside on the property
Occupied habitat = 8.61 acres (Naples UE & FLUCCS 832 & FLUCCS 320 communities)
Therefore, tortoise density on the property is approximately 2.44 tortoise per acre (21
tortoise \8.61 acres of occupied habitat)
Z:MaNe Pm}M%Nm W-PI UWd Abhodk- 77 roe PM 06- Ip➢M*nmmnct BSlPmum,d Sprk, 8vvv,
C
Aaenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 153 of 266
NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH (NNUMC)
Protected Species Survey
Page 5
All documented burrows were flagged in the field and their location taken by GPS. See attached
drawing entitled "NN United Methodist Church— Protected Species Survey" for specific
locations. Abandoned burrows flagged may include "old" tortoise burrows or armadillo holes.
Wild Pine ffillandsia fasci data)
Several common wild pine (Tl'llandsia fascictrlata) were observed in trees on the parcel.
Table 1. Protected species list according to FLUCCS category.
FLUCCS
Potential Listed Specie@
Sciendflc Name
Defflogna ted Status
FWCor
FWS
FDA
320 & 329E
Audubon's Crested Caracas
Polyborus plancus audubonii
T
T
Beautiful Pawpaw
Deenngothamnuspulchellus
E
E
Burrowing Owl
Speotyto cunicularia
SSC
-
Curtis Milkweed
Asclepius curNssii
E
-
Fakahatchm Burtnannia
Burmannia flava
E
_
Florida Black Bear
Ursus amencanus flondanus
T
-
Florida Coontie
Zamlaf/oridana
C
-
Florida Sandhill Crane
Grus canadensis pratensu
T
_
Gopher Frog
Rana capito
SSC
-
Gopher Tortoise
Gopheruspolyphemus
SSC
-
Eestem Indigo Snake
Drymarchon corais cooper!
T
T
Southeastern American Kestrel
Falco sparverius paulus
T
416E
Beautiful Pawpaw
Deeringothamnus pulchellus
E
E
Big Cypress Fox Squirrel
Schaus niger micennia
T
Eastern Indigo Snake
Drymarehon corgis couperi
T
T
FakehatchoeBurmannin
Burmanntafava
E
Florida Black Bear
Ursus americanus floridanus
T
Florida Coontie
Zamfa floridana
C
Florida Panther
Felis concolor coryi
E
E
Gopher Frog
Rawcapito
SSC
Gopher Tortoise
Gopheruspolyphemus
SSC
Red- Cockaded Woodpecker
Ficoides borealis
T
E
Satinleaf
Chrysophyllum oliviforme
E
Southeastern American Kestrel
Falco sparverius paulus
T
-
Twisted Air Plant
Tillandsia flexousa
E
424
NONE
932
NONE
Abbreviations:
Agencies
FWC= Fkaida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
FDA= Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
FWS= United States Fish and Wildlife Service
S
&— Endangered
T( Threatened
T {S /A)--Threatened/Similarity of Appearance
Z:Mdve rryM.eYW WuW N�IS UoYW McOOdu�. Il we lUD.ameOGOD➢31B^vuomm�N891PmemW 9PSb am'�Y.deo
Agenda Item No. 1 7C
Ju!y 27, 2010
NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH Pane 1,54 of 266
Protected Species Survey
Page 6
SSC= Species of Special Concern
C —Commercially Exploited
Table 2. Birds, Mammals, Amphibians, Reptiles, & plants Observed on the Subject property,
Re tiles
Common Name Scientific Name Observation Lb tedY Status
T
Brown Anole Anolis sagrei DV N
Southern Black Rac= i COluber constrictor I DV I N
= =Protected Species
Abbreviations:
Agcocips
FWC-Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commiaeion
FDA= Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
FWS= United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Status
E= Endangered
T- Threatened
Z`Aa PZW V: X.Ow Uo Npheda -12 �v. PUbimmv 8p ®BwayAoc
C
C
A
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHUR(fg"tW66
Protected Species Survey
page 7
T(S/A)--Threatened/Similarity of Appearance
SSC— Species of Special Concern
CE-Co mnermally Exploited
Observations
DV =Dinxt Visual
HV =Heard Vocalization
OT=-Observed Tracks
OH -Observed Hole\&m ow
MT—Marked Tree
C--Cavity
Table 3. Field time spent on the subject properly.
Table 4. Representative vegetation by native FLUCCS community on the North Naples United
Methodist Church property.
SCIENTIFIC COMMON
NAME NAME STRATUM
320 — Shrub & Brushland
Common
Rhodomyrtus tomentosa*
downy rose myrtle
mid -story
Querew eHwuff
runner oak
ground cover
Smilax spp.
smilax
vine
Fibs rvhmdPha
muscadine grape
vine
Toxicodendron radicans
poison ivy
vine
Rhus copallina
winged sumac
midstory
Lyoniajerruginea
rustylyonia
mid -story
i 7 I
Bumelia celastrina
buckthorn
mid -story
Quercus virginiana
live oak
canopy
Liatria tenuifolia
blazing star
ground cover
Pines eUiotfi
pine (slash pine)
canopy
Sabal palmetto
cabbage palm
canopy
Serenoa repens
saw palmetto
mid -story
Schinus rembinthtfolius*
Brazilian popper
canopy
Myrica cerifera
wax myrtle
mid -story
*invasive exotic
ZMMe[tajmt�NWmh N�pb Ud1eE MRhoNtt- 12.rUDi O 0091Wwh...W9Shastl Sp a.S 0.d.
Agenda I?em No. 17C
NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHUB 16
Protected e Species Survey
Page 8
Table 4 (continued). Representative vegetation by native FLUCCS community on the North
Naples United Methodist Church property.
SCIENTIRC COMMON
NAME NAME STRATUM
329E — Other Shrubs &
Brush - Exotic Invaded
caminon
Rhodomyrtus tomentosa*
Sahbw terebinthiblius*
Smilax spp,
Vids rotundifolia
Toxxodendron radicans
Melaleuca quinquevervia
Lygodium microphyllum *
Occasiona 1
Pinus e/lioui
QuMW iftiniana
Lyonia fermgmea
Serena repens
"invasive exodc
downy rose myrtle
mid -story
Brazilian pepper
canopy
smilax
vine
muscadine grape
vine
poison ivy
vine
melalouca
canopy
old world climbing forn
groundcover
pine (slash pine) canopy
live oak canopy
rusty lyonia raid -wry
saw palmetto mid -wry
SCIENTIFIC COMMON
NAME NAMB STRATUM
416 — Pine Fhttwoods-
Craminoid Understory-
Exotie Invaded
Common
Melaleuca gwnquevervia
Lygodium microphyllum*
Occasional
Schinus terebinthifolius
Pinus ellioal
Vitis rotundifolia
Blechman serrulatum
"invasive exotic
melaleuca canopy
old world climbing fern groundoover
Brazilian pepper
mid -story
pine (slash pine)
canopy
muscadine grape
ground cover
swamp fern
ground cover
z:v�eiw p�cJxu�NWvuli�lo umee u.ma�n • n.� rwem®e asaa9r� 9ya1a swaydoe
C
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 157 of 266
NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH (NNUMC)
Protected Species Survey
Page 9
SCIENTIRC COMMON
NAME NAME STRATUM
424 — Melaleuea
Common
Melaleuca quinquevetvia
Lygodium microphyllum•
Occasional
Schinus terebinthfoliut•
Vida rotundifolia
Blechnum semulatum
•lnvadve exotic
melaleuca canopy
old world climbing fern gmundoover
Brazilian pepper mid -story
muscadine grape ground covet
swamp fern ground cover
z+wm..+npem wwam N.qe UvW M. h. - 12.e.YDD.monc *6, Si ,e
Agenda Item No, 17C
July 27, 2010
NORTH NAPLES UNITTD METHODIST CUURCH N ?' a 266
Protected Species Survey
Page 10
North Naples United Methodist Church
Rezone Parcel
Location Map
7MA w P*awwam N.Na U.Yd M@m W- 12.aetUD� a.awllHrlr�.nrssnaw.e SMeia 8 W.0
A
3
/\
Fo
454�1
I
»
\
(
is
]
))}$)|
mom
7
!} k
�� }}
!!
)!�/|
lf:WO
kl�6A
M§vm
§
j
k )
\ )
a �
2
§ �
§
< ¥)
$-)/
( /a§
d �
�a
� 2
0
� ■-
� {A
.�
09-
■§
O ■9!
� 2g2
4 eA�
2zz
Q • §■
O §IS
w zo
(_! ®7
;!!
s
)�//(/
�|
/ƒ)
§a!!7!!!f£!
|(§
:0v A
(
q .
L/L F-7 a§§!e 0®
�,§a &,E;
I
»
\
(
is
]
))}$)|
mom
7
!} k
�� }}
!!
)!�/|
lf:WO
kl�6A
M§vm
§
j
k )
\ )
a �
2
§ �
§
< ¥)
$-)/
( /a§
d �
�a
� 2
0
� ■-
� {A
.�
09-
■§
O ■9!
� 2g2
4 eA�
2zz
Q • §■
O §IS
w zo
jo
D
'm
a
C
N
a.
d
I
I � z
�Xf
W
U1 o g
Z
:3 m
co k 2 `o
m
ayi m • � �
z
9
V I
0- • a x 1
1
S�gs
� o
g zo
a
�—
F.
.1
LL.
___ _____ __ __ _____ ____ ___
lCOPS gPPIW a rd Bind
------------------------
lu.weseg 95vuima
^TES\
O
2
0
4
U
wu�
z$
26�¢
o nx
OOy z
nnn W
0
w
J
V U)
W W W ()
LL
J
g
b
aaaaa�
N O��Onj
5 3
o
O y
yt .E 85
W
Oaiw'
O I R N r N m
U m m O e m
I
I
l
I
x
x
�
J
I
n 1
U
t
y U_
> N
a' 4
co
N m
co
W m
W 'c
CL Z n
0 z
W z �-
U U o
wO W tL
N 0
a a t�
2 0
W°le
�cc
WW�
7- cri
�- N_
w 1(
W ~�90
O iv
Paz
�O ~NO
W
2a
mom
mI
LQ
w zo
Ow
�Z
Oz
W
(0
0 0
IM
� N
F �
- a
n
C
N
Q
CD
it
7
U)
N
U1
CL.
w
O
CL
- - - - - -- �- - - - - --
A
o
m
p
z
_
2.
3O U'
m
�
LL
p C•
o g§O
O� h W�° C
� 1=o1g €
�
0
uiff
z
�foo
e,m
m$121
LL11 o.°�= as °UKU
F
a
m�
N
ru
��a
U W
w
7
. . x
LL U �
U
0
I
1 IPD4DS eIPPIW .6PIa °uld
I
I n
1 � ,
I
I I-------- - - - - -- �u°W0683 BBBUIWQ - - -_
I T
m
I m a W n
I � m
I a w
E N
1
I � x
I �
I M1 Z x
I
I °c' • x
I ° m
1 of N
I • x 1O
I
I x
I x
I '
1 °
9Sb� lddJ z£B m
WW
O
O
>R
OO Za
a F
n
0p0 4
C v ^n W
C7
J Z
CA 4
www Ugn::.
U
N
LL a
o i
� 'f m O
P004 �UFJ�.O— u1J
m
9
H
ee��°
aaaa°a�
m u°ii mtmv �i9i �.
W O- -O'^
i
5 �
A
a
p$
ro—
m
oa�LL
w
mma
� O Q
I
I
I
I
m I
o I
I
I
� I
I
a !
U
W
� a
D r
U)
w �
W
R c
w
Z
U U o
wOW
or Q
9L o
O
'ww �
W°co
LL m
N1 ga
Lu
et
V Z t�+f
r N
Wto �(
NLL �
W to
p � o
O G g
� a z
q ��o
' �=a
q CLu
Ci
N...
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 163 of 266
EXHIBIT 7
EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE
PROTECTION PLAN
c
U�co
� o N
T N 0
o �
ZN 7
E T�
m m
� a
c
s
d
"r r,
V
r Z
v
8
0
o
4
Y m �
m.Em `❑
Z E
CD J^ � � �,A
. La 0 W
0 0. GE Em- F-
!n z yea ems
V Z n g 'S V) v E _
v z o ns 2
LL •fi m G' Y W Q .Q (I�
W V N O
Y
a> > v
Z Ow h =g o�c Z n E m
a N m O 3
F c � �W; 0 r y H
UJ 0 E��$ at o E €
fA CL �+magg �m BRR y 8
Q F Z
N o
U) O
W as 0 =
`p0 Q Ea s o
9 10 N
w LU W Z; u a a�
� � 5�2� �n
WD Zm W > a u Ws a1
a
aIL p'8 m E' _ €o
of S os g �o 3 E
2 D N 7 y 7
OU
a = oM H c u �
Z LL 9
-9m iW , Oa
) � 1 t _a)
= W H N O M 7 C z
XLU =Uz �c�Om
CL p r N M
cr
c
3
s 13 Wv
a f ,
E f
y a.
. .
-e
X91
�3
r
goo& -A ` J
05
Z ■ te
U
0
E
C
m
Q
N
L r
Qa u H8,
4° E. dill;
U
a
�� $.
so
12 �s g
10 ..J Al II��o o E
1
Oa
W
M W •N
-U O C
a (yo owns
sWaO
M,
�5
4
m o
o
w
sIF
v m
C
0
w
oil
0 6
lw
r
Y
c >,
ad
o
oE f
� rn
rp
0
0
cxo
G
r
0 D IL O
Rpf
a -C, w
o � O CrL 0 ¢
N 0Caw° `o$ oa„
°q C3 E1 41 ccy $tea: EE2
NN eo ay 6 ow,gu °
C;
m a a 4
m
uj O gg m ayes 4w
2 m m
'1'!\ o 01.E G o o
V� `d 0E „Sc yAp2a�
!r •— = m m m� Y U umi
wQg „�ma�ra33d
o r a'S a�tc a
U— 3w r cr a a a $.
.m
0
o
a
.m
m �
.E
Lu
0
m
o�
0
z�
N
°
Y
E
w
98
all
s
Y
0
a X k m
If
'D d
`E0
my�
W r, o
y C 7m
G u O r
3
m
s � 0
C
Cw L u
LL1-
u E�
0
a m�
a m - °g
:e ■r
0 6 o u
y
Z�
r z 0
�g ffi'
JCL
u 1 1 1 _
F5a€
W
V
5
g
�i
W�
Q
08
R
S
� s
� E
g� c
EL
s
i Aw
Agenda Rem No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 167 of 266
EXHIBIT S
GOPHER TORTOISE
RELOCATION PERMIT
C
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
PERMIT Page 168 of 266
Issued Under Authority of the Wildlife Code of the State of Florida
(Title 68A, Florida Administrative Code) by the
o Hbat O Species ORDAo AND dLDeetMECONSERVA320 sop2-699�NDivisionat stin,e2O Meridian 3l3oe50)91990 17310
Permit No. W R08196 Issuance Date A2dl 21. 2008 Expiration Date October 21.2 08
Permit Type Tortoise Relocation Specific Rule Authority 68A- 9.002, SBA-25-002 & 6BA -27 004
Parmittee Mr. Tim Hanook Consultant Mr. Ray Ashton
Affiliation Davidson Engineering ' Company Ashton alodiversfty Resea ch &Preservation Inat., r
Address 2154 Trade Center Way Address 14260 W Newberry Rd. PMB 331
Na lea FL 34109 Newberrv. FL 32689
Phone./Fax No. 239 -- 7 -3916 L2513-5, 9 ri PhonefFex No. 352 -495- 74491352 -495 -7433
Signature (rte Date _ G S• O_ ___ _
Not vend unto alynsd
comficadon: I hereby state and confirm by Signature that I hews raoehnd, Mad, understand, and soma to abide try all regulations, guidelines, and
Provisions regarding the laauanca Of this perrrdt, and I further prtdythat the Irdonnadon submitted! d! Inthisappllcation and supportingdocummatt Is
compete and accurate to the beat or mytmowledge and betbl.I umyrstandthatenyhW alabm ma herein May sub1&"ma to edmbal penalties. I
further state Chet I wgl abide byall applicable Staq, Faderal, and lacer taws, Please return a signed COPY to this office.
The above named Permitteo is authorized to capture, remove and relocate gopher tortoises (Gopherus
Polyphemus) in Florida pursuant to Rules 6BA- 9.002, 68A- 25.002 and 6BA - 27.004, F.A.C., the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission's Gopher Tortoise Relocation Guidelines dated October 26, 2007 and
subject to the following provisions /conditions.
Provisions/Conditions:
Up to 18 gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) maybe captured by nonhannful means in association
with development activities at the North Naples Methodist Church Development project site (T498, R25E,
S10 with Latitude 26 °12'59" N and Longitude 81 04725" W), in Collier County , relocated to and released
at the 12.05 -acre off -site Picayune Tortoise and RCW Relocation Site (T49S, R27E, S30 with Latitude
26 01010.5" N and Longitude 8104111" W), in Collier County which is owned by Citygate Development
and CG il, represented by Mr. Roger Rice, 9010 Strada Stall Ct, Suite 207, Naples, FL 34109,239-593-
1002, 239 - 593 -1309 (fax). Any gopher tortoise burrow commensals encountered in the capture
operation may likewise be live -captured, relocated and released. However, no more than one indigo
snake (Drymarchon corais coupeM, or 10 each of Florida mice (Podomys floridanus) and gopher frogs
(Rana capitc) may be relocated. Should additional specimens of those species or other species listed as
endangered, threatened or of special concern, be encountered, the capture operation is to be suspended
immediately and this office contacted for instructions.
2. Tortoises shall not be captured/relocated on days for which the overnight low temperature for that day
and the two consecutive days thereafter is forecasted by the U.S. National Weather Service to be below
50 °F, This 3 -day window of milder overnight temperatures is to allow the relocated tortoises to settle into
the recipient site. Authorizing the capture /relocation is otherwise predicated and conditioned on the
information and assurances provided in the Permittee's January 12, 2008 application (revised April 1,
2008), the assurances of which are herein incorporated by reference.
3. Captured gopher tortoises that show signs of disease (i.e., nasal and ocular discharge, emaciation, etc.)
should not be relocated off -site. At the Permittee's discretion, symptomatic tortoises may be: relocated
on -site; transported to and quarantined at a FWC licensed wildlife rehabilitation center (list available upon
request) or licensed veterinary facility and observed for recovery and subsequent relocation along with
others from the population; transported and donated to a FW C permitted disease research program; or
humanely euthanized by a licensed veterinarian when disease is advanced.
4. This permit does not authorize Permittee access to any public or private properties. Any required
permission accordingly must be secured from the appropriate landholders prior to undertaking anywork
on such properties.
3
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
PERMIT Page 169 of 266
Permit no. WRO819
/ Provisions/Conditions: Continued
5. Captures /relocations may be conducted only if local written approvals have been obtained for clearing,
grading, or construction activities. This permit is subject to revocation at any time pursuant to Chapter
120, Florida Statutes. It is nontransferable and must be readily available for inspection at all times while
engaging in the permitted activities.
6. The activities authorized under this Permit may be carried out by authorized personnel or contractors of
the Permittee or designated Consulting FIm1 (Authorized Agent), provided all such activities are under
the direct supervision and responsibility of the Permittee or Authorized Agent. The Permittee and
Authorized Agent shall be as fully responsible for any such activities to the same extent as it they had
themselves carried out those activities under this Permit.
7. The Permittee shall notify the Permit Coordinator by fax at (850)486 -5297 or by phone at (850)410 -0656,
ext. 17327, within 24 hours of initiating the tortoise relocation effort.
B. Either this original permit, or a complete copy, must be clearly posted at the affected site at all times
while engaged in the permitted tortoises relocation activities.
9. The Permittee, by signing this permit, specifically agrees to allow authorized Commission personnel,
upon presentation of credentials as may be required by law, access to the donor and recipient sites, at
reasonable times, for the purpose of inspecting the capture /relocation activities authorized under this
permit.
10. The Permittee shall submit a report detailing the capturelrelocation to the Species Conservation Planning
Section (SCPS) Regional contact person, with copies provided to the recipient site landowner and this
office, within 30 days of release of the captured/relocated tortoises involved. A report form is attached
for use in that regard. Any request for permit renewal or extension shalf be submitted at least 45 days
prior to the expiration date of this permit.
A person whose substantial Interests are affected by FWC's action may petition for an administrative proceeding
(hearing) under sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes. A person seeking a hearing on FWC's
action shall file a petition for hearing with the agency within 21 days of receipt of written notice of the decision.
The petition must contain the Information and otherwise complywith section 120.569, Florida Statutes, and the
uniform rules of the Florida Division of Administration, chapter 28 -106, Florida Administrative Code. The
Permittee shall cease all work authorized bythis permit, upon receiving written noticethatthe FWC has received
a petition. The cease work order shall remain In effect until the petition is resolved. The enclosed Explanation of
Rights statement provides additional information as to the rights of parties whose substantial interests are or
may be affected by this action.
Kenneth D. Haddad
Executive Dire or
W.
Elsa Hau , Ph. D., Leader
Species Conservation Planning Section
ATW /EH /dm
LIC 6 -20
WR06196.per
Enclosure: Notice of Rights
After Action Report form
cc w/ enc.: Mr. Roper Rice, Pickayune To,toiss and RCW Relocaaon Site
oc w/o env.. Ms. Daphne McCann
�a..�,.. FWC Southwest Region
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 170 of 266
EXHIBIT 9
k
ZONING MAP c
t
LAST REVISION: ZONING-------OTHER
a
I�p �
It
a�
>
ti
D
I rv.
I' wss
a
I I �
�aa
i � 5
B €7
R
6g
�6
a
r �
r z
��b � ::III• iH R
<.! ou6
G 0 5IS
.moon
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27. 2010
Page 171 of 266
fie HletMC /AmJraedagleel FDWWaly Maps am M efnald
Cean ty eMme aeaignothg historic a grchae No resources.
I., lnl tl. g1.5 4)
01's
R
t
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 172 of 266
EXHIBIT 10
kow
ENVIRONMENTAL C
ASSESMENT
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 173 of 266
Environme-ftal Risk Management, Inc,
Property Assessment and Remedlotfon Consultants
PREPARED BY:
Environmental Risk Management, Inc,
Step ten A Iffi iker, M FEA REPA
President
December 14, 2000
• Serving Florida
www.envmgmt.com
PRASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Phone •
1.888- ENV -MGMT
43 Acres at the North East Corner of
(1- .ee8- 3e8-U68)
Pine Ridge Road and Goodlette- Frank- Road
941 -348 -1719
Collier County, Florida
-�
• Fax
1 -688- ENV -61AX
(1- a88-368 -6329)
941 - 348 -1720 -
'•. Corpbrote Office
4131 5th Ave B.W.
Naples, FL 34119
PREPARED FOR:
Lee Treadwell
G4 Partnership, et al.
2600 Golden Gate Parkway, #200
Naples, Florida 34105
PREPARED BY:
Environmental Risk Management, Inc,
Step ten A Iffi iker, M FEA REPA
President
December 14, 2000
A, Environmeml Risk Management Inc,
Property Assessment and Remedlatlon Consultants
Serving Flondo • E December 14, 2000
Agenda Item too. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 174 of 266
n rther on
s
WWW.envmgmt.com
Lee Treadwell
• Phone •
G 4 Partnership, et al.
1
2600 Golden Gate Parkway, #200
y,
-888- ENV -MGMT
(1- 888-368 -6468)
Naples, Florida 34105 -
`
941 -348 -1719
RE: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Fax •
43 -acre site NE of Pine Ridge Road and Goodlette -Frank Road
1 -888- ENV -6rAx
(1 -888- 368.6329)
Naples, Florida
941- 346.1720.
ERMI File No. 00083A
Corporate office •• Dear Lee:
4131 6th Ave S.W.' Naples. FL 34119 Environmental Risk Management, Inc. (ERMI) has completed a Phase I
Environmentai Site Assessment of the referenced facility in accordance with our
i, contract agreement dated December 1, 2000.
ERMI has conducted site and study area research. Database reporting,
regulatory file research, historical research and site research in accordance with
ASTM designation E 1527 -97 "Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments" was provided by Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. (CEC).
The December 12, 2000 CEC report is attached. ERNH has reviewed the CEC
report and ERMI concurs with the findings.
The purpose of this investigation was to investigate the environmental quality of
the soil and groundwater at the subject property to determine if any petroleum or
hazardous substances have impacted the site. in the mid 1990's, as manager of
the CEC Environmental Division, I investigated the environmental quality of the
site and study area. There were no recognized environmental conditions from
the research performed at that time.
9
ERMI personnel observed a pad mounted electrical transformer and two pole
mounted electrical transformers in the 100 -foot FPL utility easement located
west of the site. No evidence of staining, streaks, sheens, or other evidence of
PCB -laden oils was observed on or around the equipment. Based on
experience at hundreds of other sites in Collier County with transformers and
- several interviews with FPL technicians over the past ten years, FPL has
replaced any equipment suspected of containing PCB's in Collier County.
ERMI concludes that these transformers represent no impact to the
environmental quality of the subject property.
C
C
AJenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Lee TreadweU Page 175 of 266
December 14,1000
Page 2 o!2
! Two wells are located in the southwest portion of the property (see Photographs in Appendix Q.
No evidence of environmental impact was identified in the vicinity of the wells. We do not
suspect contamination in the vicinity of these wells. The purpose of these wells is not suspected
to be for monitoring, contaminant concentrations.
No other developed structures on the site or in the site vicinity are of concern.
Besed on the results of this investigation, no further action is considered necessary to
investigate the environmental quality of the subject property.
Please call 1- 888. ENV -MGMT (1 -88 &368 -6468) if we can be of additional service to yon.
_i
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT, . INC.
Stephen F. Iiilfiker, M REPA
President
sa
IL
}
Agenda Item No, 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 176 of 266
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
3.0
QUICK LOOK SUWTARy .....................
.............. .............. .......
. ....
I Land Use I-Iistary Investigation Results .
. .. ..... .......... -
Regulatory Documents Research Results ............................
............................... ...
1. 1.3 Site Reconnaissance Results ..........
—, ......................... I..", ...........
1.2 CONCLUSIONS ............. ........................................................
2.0
INTRODUCTION ................................
...............................................
................... .
2-1 PURPOQ=
......
2-2
3.0
2
2
2.3
............................... .......... ................................... ...........
STANDARD OF CARE
4.0
2.4
LJ�MATIONS. .....
2
STIT, DESCRIPTION ..............
............
2
3.1
3.2
LOCATION... ........................
77
FIELD RE
RECONNAISSANCE ............................
4
3.2-1 Site Observations ... ....... .................................
2-2
........... ........................ .......
................. ............................... .............. ..................... ......... I ..........
jymTHODOLOGy ............
2
2
2.3
............................... .......... ................................... ...........
STANDARD OF CARE
2
2.4
LJ�MATIONS. .....
2
STIT, DESCRIPTION ..............
............
2
3.1
3.2
LOCATION... ........................
4
FIELD RE
RECONNAISSANCE ............................
4
3.2-1 Site Observations ... ....... .................................
4
..................................... _ .................
3.2.2 study Area observations ...................
4
RECORDSREVIEW __ ................... _ ........ _ ...............
4
4-1
... * ....... ........ ..............................................
FLORIDA
4,2
...................... ... .
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC nON ...................6
COL7ZER-COLTNTYPOLL'-'"ONCONMOL-DEPARTNMNI
6
6
43
........
. ....... ......... .....
ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES,
6
FEDERAL AND STATE
43.1 National Priorities TB .................
7
List
..........................
4.3-2 CERCLA Systems
7
43.3 RCRA TSD m ..........................
on ystem ........... I
............................ .
4-3-4 RCPZ Information System ..................... ........................ ......... 8
4-3.1 Emergency Response Notification System............ ... ........ * ............ * .... * .... .......... 8
43.6 State superf=d/Ab .......... 0 ..............................
4.3.7 Stationary Tank andoned Waste sites .................. .... ................... ............ 9
4.3.8 petroleum Inventory__ ............ M .......................................... ........ 8
Contamination Detail Report ..........................
43-9 Groundwater Manage,,,,
Syste
'm_ 9
4.4 PHYSICAL SETTING ............ ....... ................. 0 ........ ................ 9
.....................................................
4*5 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ...... .9
4.6 CHAIN OF TITLE REVIEW .................
4.7 IIISTORICAL PERSP -.9
ECTrVB ..... 10
REFERENCES 10
APPENDIX A: Site Location Map and Site Survey
APPENDIX B: Environmental Site Observation Guide
APPENDIX C: Color Photographs
APPENDIX D.- Database Research Results and Regulatory Information
APPENDIX E: USCS Quad Map
APPENDIX F: Aerial Photograph
j
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 177 of 256
1 1.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1.1 QUICK LOOK SUMMARY
The results of the investigation are summarized below according to the perceived potential
for environmental impact to the subject property,
1. I.1 Land Use History and Investigation Resultg
Based on the land use history investigation, former study area activities are not
considered to represent potential sources of environmental impact to the subject
property.
L 1.2 Regulawry Documents Research Results
Regulatory research produced no evidence to indicate environmental impact to the
subject property from facilities and/or activities in the study area. Please refer to
Section 4.0 of this report for more information -
-1.1.3 Sire Reconnalssanee Results
Based on site observations, no evidence was discovered to indicate that the site has
been environmentally impacted by petroleum or hazardous substances as a result of
current or former site activities. Section 3.2.1 of this report describes the site
reconnaissance.
T 12 CONCLUSIONS
A
The Environmental Division of coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. (CEC) has performed
a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of
ASTM Practice E 1527 -97 of the subject property; approximately 43 acres located at the
northeast quadrant of Goodlette -Frank Road and Pine Ridge Road, Collier County, Florida
Based on the results of this assessment, no further action is considered necessary to
investigate the soil or groundwater quality of the subject property. No evidence was
discovered to suggest the existence of environmentally impacted soil or groundwater
at the subject property, either from site or study area activities.
Recommendations to consider regarding environmental management at the site include a
Policy to prevent discharges of hazardous materials or petroleum hydrocarbons into the
environment. This is especially significant in Florida due to a shallow water table. Such a
Y policy would require containment facilities around all potential sources of contamination
and emergency procedures to follow in the event of a discharge. Any fuel tanks used at the
site should be closely monitored to prevent unexpected discharges and any installation of
underground storage tanks should comply with Florida Administrative Code (PAC) Chapter
Agenda lien No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 178 of 266
62.761. Similarly, other activities on the site from the date of this
conducted with care to avoid the release of hazardous substances, report should be
introduced to the site, a control policy of spill, release, and discharge any such materials are
implemented. Area facilities should also be scrutinized and regulatorofficials
should be
contacted if a change in site activities causes potentially hazardous materials to be used.
-, 2.0 INTRO /pN
2.1 P OSE
The objective of this investigation is to use reasonable judgment in assessing the evidence
obtained from the methodology defined below. The purpose is to determine:
1 • Whether sufficient evidence exists to suggest
impacted with petroleum, or with the subject property may be materially
in the Comprehensive Environmental hazardous and toxic substances currently defined
(CERCLA) as d the Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
amended and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA), as amended, which would require removal or remedial action by the
foregoing statutes
2• Whether sufficient evidence exists to recommend further investigation of the subject
Property, which may include sampling and intrusive testing Procedures. e
2.2 MZnIQD0L0Gy
In the opinion of Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc., the performance of an
? environmental site assessment in accordance with ASTM Practice E 1527 constitutes good
commercial practice. The methodology is summarized in our contract agreement dated
November 30, 2000. Conformance with this method represents appropriate inquiry to
determine the location and existence of potential sources of environmental impact without
intrusive testing. The intention of this diligence is to satisfy the level of inquiry required to
(35)(E))•
establish the innocent landowner defense to super[und liability for our clients (42 USC 9601
2.3 TANDARD OF CARE
The rECOmmendatio judgments,
data colIocted the work conclusions disclosed in this report are based on the
k Performed and
the best of our knowledge. CEC represents that all
services performed in this investigation were guided by professional standards current as of
the date of this report.
2.4 LIMITATIONS
This environmental site assessment report is limited to the investigation of the potential
impact of hazardous substances or petroleum hydrocarbons to the subject property.
2
3
T
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 179 of 266
Additional environmental services such as wetlands delineation, endangered species
identification, asbestos surveys, and radon sampling are not included in this report. The
investigation is limited to the scope of work defined in the contract agreement.
Based upon information obtained from aerial photographs and site representatives, the
subject property has never been developed. Therefore, the following standard sources of
historical data were deemed "not likely to be sufficiently useful" for determination of prior
land uses:
• Building Department Records
• Property Tax Files
The following standard sources of historical data were not available, not provided, or not
obtainable within the time constraints of this report:
• Fire Insurance maps (not available for Naples, Florida).
• Land Title Records (not provided as of the date of this report).
Consequently, historical data for the purposes of this report was limited to available aerial
photographs, CEC experience 'in the study area, and interviews with the client.
Subsurface testing and sampling procedures were beyond the scope of services of this
investigation. For additional confidence regarding environmental impact to the property,
further study involving subsurface testing and analysis would be required. Further
assurance is a recommendation that is always available to the client at this level of
T investigation.
Section 3.2 and many of the conclusions of this report are based on the site reconnaissance,
which was conducted on December 7, 2000. If further assurance regarding environmental
impact on the subject property subsequent to the site reconnaissance is desired, CEC or
another environmental consultant should visit the site, and update the report.
Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. It
may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to whom it is addressed
1' without written consent of CEC. It is intended to be used in its entirety. Neither all nor any
part of the content of this report, or copy thcroof, shall be conveyed to the public through
advertising, public relations, news, sales, or any other media without written consent and
approval of CEC. Acceptance of and/or use of this assessment constitute acceptance of all
- provisions and limitations stated in this report.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 180 of 266
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION kw
3.1 LOCATION
i The subject property is located in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier
County, Florida. A Site Location Map is provided as Appendix A of this report. A copy of
the site survey, as provided by Mr. Steve Hilfker of Environmental Risk Management, is
also included in Appendix A.
3.2 FIELD RECONNA_rSSANCB
'
32.1 Site Observations
CEC personnel observed the subject properly on December 7, 2000, Access to the
site was gained from GOOdlette-Frank Road, west of the subject property. An
Environmental Site Observation Guide, completed during the site reconnaissance, is
provided in Appendix B. Color photographs taken during the site reconnaissance
are presented in Appendix C.
The subject property was observed to consist of approximately -43 acres of
undeveloped, wooded land, Various trails were observed throughout the site.
Beehives were observed in the central portion of the site.
Two wells were observed in the southwest portion of the site. The purpose of these
wells was not detemtined during the site reconnaissance. CEC interviewed Mr.
Steve Hilfiker regarding the wells. Mr. Hilfiker indicated that he had spoken with
Mr. Lee Treadwell of the Barron Collier Corporation (current owner of the
Property). Mr• Treadwell indicated that to the best of his knowledge the wells were
for development purposes (i.e. hydrogeologic wells). Mr. Treadwell was unaware
Of any past environmental concern in connection with the subject property, These
wells are not considered to represent a source of environmental impact to the site
based on the fact that the wells are to be used for development purposes. If it is
y
learned that the purpose of these wells is for contamination
z
assessment purposes,
further assessment may be necessary,
No evidence of aboveground storage tanks, underground storage tanks, pole or pad -
mounted transformers, soil stains, distressed vegetation, or other evidence of
~
environmental impact was observed at the subject property,
3.2.2 Study Area Observations
The study area is defined as all property within a one -
quarter mile radius of the site.
A vehicle search of the area was conducted to determine
conservative boundary
limits and to create a list of facilities within this area that appeared to have the
Potential to environmentally impact the subject property. Subsequent to the site
-r
J
F,genda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 181 of 266
visit, governmental databases were reviewed and a more complete list of suspect
facilities was obtained. A more accurate and reliable determination of the boundary
limits was subsequently performed using aerial photography.
The land in the study area was observed to be commercial, residential, or
undeveloped land.
Adjacent properties generally represent the greatest off-site environmental threat to a
site. The adjacent properties observed during the study area search were;
North: North Naples United Methodist Church
South: Pine Ridge Road, Residential
East. Pine Ridge Middle School, North Naples Fire Contra]
West: Goodlette -Frank Road, Residential
Pine Ridge Middle School is located east of the subject property. This facility
reported a discharge of petroleum to the State on January 3, 1990. Based on
information reviewed, an underground storage tank (located approximately 400 to
500 feet east of the subject property) was removed from Pine Ridge Middle School
in 1990. Groundwater contamination was detected during the tank removal process.
r Assessment services were conducted subsequent to the tank closure. CEC
reviewed a copy of the contamination assessment at the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP). Based on information reviewed, the reported
groundwater flow direction was towards the cast, away from the subject property,
The FDEP issued the facility a Site Rehabilitation Completion Order (SRCO) in
1995. This facility is not considered to represent a source of environmental impact
to the site based on the distance to the site, groundwater flow direction, and
rehabilitation status.
North Naples Fire Control reported a discharge of petroleum to the State subsequent
to removal of two underground tanks in 1996. CEC reviewed a copy of a tank
closure assessment report that was submitted to the Collier County Pollution
Control Department (CCPCD). Based on information reviewed, contaminated soil
and groundwater was detected during the tank closure process. The contaminated
soil was removed during the tank closure process. Impacted groundwater was
detected in the southeast monitor well. Impacted groundwater was not detected in
the remaining monitor wells. This facility is eligible for one of the State's
petroleum cleanup programs. These programs provide funds for assessment and
remediation of contaminated sites on a ranked, prcapproval basis. Currently,
funding is not available at this site. Funding will become available once the site
becomes a priority site. This facility is not considered to represent a source of
environmental impact to the site based on the fact that all of the impacted soil has
_ been removed and "clean" monitor wells were located between the subject property
and the impacted area. Please refer to Appendix D for further documentation
regarding this facility.
5
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 182 of 266
z
i
No evidence was discovered to indicate that any other adjacent proprsties are
currently sources of environmental impact to the subject property.
4.0 RECORDS REVIEW
f The study area was observed to identify any facilities with
perceived to have the potential to environmentaLl rand uses or activities which are
facilities (if available) were reviewed at Collier County pollution Contrl Property Files for such
and/or Florida Department of Environmental Protection Department (CCPCD)
reviewed for the suspect facilities identified from the field Diuvesti Regulatory databases were
produced no evidence to indicate potential environmental impact to woe subject Regulatory research
facilities and/or activities in the study area I Property from
4.1 FLO A DEPARTMENT OF n NT�NT'.AL PROTECTION
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) files contain public
information (Public Records, Chapter 199, Florida Statutes) for facilities impacted by
Petroleum and/or hazardous
substances. No evidence of impact from facilities in the
study aiee was identified
from FDEP file research.
4.2 COLLiEIt CO>�tt�Ty POLU rION CONrrtrlr DEPARTMENT
The Collier County Pollution Control Department (CCPCD) keeps records of public
complaints, maintains files on underground storage tanks in
COW= County, and files
hazardous waste compliance inspections for facilities in Collier County
complaints None
_f
. of the
reviewed at CCPCD are considered to
environmental impact to the subject property' represent potential sources of "
l P The
per' following facilities arc within one -half
mile of the subject property
1 P P� and have
reported discharges of petroleum to the State:
Pine Ridge Middle School
North Naples Fire Control
Moorings Park
Please refer in Section 32.2 of this report for information
regarding pine Ridge Middle
School and North Naples Fire Control
Moorings Park (located greater than 500 feet south of the subject property) reported a
discharge of petroleum to
product the State subsequent to closure of three underground
storage tanks from their property. CEC reviewed a closure assessment
Moorings
conducted at the
Park facility. Based on a review of the closure
assessment, there were three tank
areas at the Moorings Park facility. Soil and groundwater sampling was conducted during
the tank closure process
at each tank area, Based on a review of the results, contaminated
soil was detected in two of the tank areas. The contaminated
soil was removed during the
closure process. Contaminated groundwater was detected in one of the tank
areas. This
It
6
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 183 of 266
facility is eligible for one of the State's petroleum cleanup programs. These programs
Provide funds for assessment and remediation of contaminated sites on a ranked
preapproval basis. This facility is not considered to represent a source of environmental
impact to the subject property based on the distance to the site and its eligibility status.
j 4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES. FEDERAL AND STATE
A review of reasonably available State and Federal listings was conducted via a regulatory
database search to determine if Recognized Environmental Conditions exist at any nearby
facilities which may impact the subject property. The databases contained in this report
identify properties recognized by the FDEP and the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) as impacted, potentially impacted, or as generators of hazardous waste. The database
research results are presented in Appendix D.
The database records were reviewed for the subject property and properties within an
Approximate Minmmm Search Distance (AMSD) as defined by American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM) E 1527 -97, Section 7.2.1.1. The tmnm AMSD is used in lieu
of radius in order to include irregularly shaped properties. Brief descriptions of each
database and corresponding research results are provided on'thdfollowing pages.
The accuracy, completeness, and availability of record information vary among information
sources, including governmental sources. Information that was 'Practically Reviewable" as
defined by ASTM E 1527 -97, Section 7-1 .4.3 was researched during this investigation.
4.3.1 National Priorities List
e
The National Priorities List (NPL) is the most recent listing of environmentally impacted
facilities under the EPA jurisdiction_ The NFL was created to prioritize these properties for
remedial action fimding by the Hazardous Waste Substance Supetfund Program. This
"Superfund" was initially established under the Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liabilities act of 1980 ( CERCLA) and reinstated under the Superfund
Amendments and Re- authorization Act of 1986 (SARA). There is no property within one
mile of the subject property that is listed in this database.
4.3 -2 CERCLA Information Svstems
The CERCLA Information Systems (CERCLIS) is the EPA Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response database. Over 25,000 sites nationwide are reported to the agency as
having potential environmental problems. The EPA or the appropriate state agency
determine if hazardous substances are present in sufficient quantity to justify placing the site
on the NPL. The facility would then be prioritized, according to the degree of
environmental health and safety concerns, to determine the ranlang of its federally regulated
cleanup. "There are no facilities listed in this database within one -half mile of the subject
AWN property.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 184 of 266
I_
LJ
The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) database contains a listing of
facilitis that have been reported to the EPA as having released potentially hazardous
material.. The listing includes information such as the date of the incident, the response by
those involved, the hazardous substances involved, and the reported location of the incident,
as The subject property is not listed in this database.
4.3.6 Sieee Sup nd Abandoned Waste Sites
.s
The State Superfund/Abaadoned Waste Sites database is maintained by the FDEP and lists
hazardous waste facilities with the potential of environmental impact, or sites that have
reported a release of hazardous waste. There are no facilities within one mile of the subject
property that are listed in this database-
4-3.7 Stationary Tank Inventory
The FDEP Stationary Tank Inventory (STI) lists all facilities with registered storage tanks in
Florida The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requires owners of storage
tanks to notify the appropriate State agency (FDEP) of each tank's size, type, location age,
and purpose (40 CFR Part 280.22). The subject property is not listed in this database, pine
Ridge Middle School (adjacent east) and North Naples Fire Control (adjacent east) are
listed in this database, Please refer to Section 3.2,2 of this report for information regarding
these facilities,
8
4.33 RCRA TSD Information ystem
The Resource and Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) Treatment, Storage, and Disposal
i
Facilities (TSD) database provides a listing of all facilities associated with the treatment,
storage, or disposal of hazardous waste, There is no facility within one mile of the subject
Property that appears in this database,
4.3.4 RCRI 3 Information System
The Resource and Conservation Recovery Informabon System (RCRIS) database provides a
listing of FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) reports for hazardous waste treatment,
storage, or disposal facilities. These reports information
present about enforcement actions
addressing violations meeting the criteria supplied by the user. The violations shown in this
report represent cases that have been addressed by a warning letter or more formal
enforcement action taken by the EPA the State
or of Florida. The subject property and
adjacent properties are not listed in this database.
4.3.5 Emergency Response NOtiflcaIiun System
The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) database contains a listing of
facilitis that have been reported to the EPA as having released potentially hazardous
material.. The listing includes information such as the date of the incident, the response by
those involved, the hazardous substances involved, and the reported location of the incident,
as The subject property is not listed in this database.
4.3.6 Sieee Sup nd Abandoned Waste Sites
.s
The State Superfund/Abaadoned Waste Sites database is maintained by the FDEP and lists
hazardous waste facilities with the potential of environmental impact, or sites that have
reported a release of hazardous waste. There are no facilities within one mile of the subject
property that are listed in this database-
4-3.7 Stationary Tank Inventory
The FDEP Stationary Tank Inventory (STI) lists all facilities with registered storage tanks in
Florida The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requires owners of storage
tanks to notify the appropriate State agency (FDEP) of each tank's size, type, location age,
and purpose (40 CFR Part 280.22). The subject property is not listed in this database, pine
Ridge Middle School (adjacent east) and North Naples Fire Control (adjacent east) are
listed in this database, Please refer to Section 3.2,2 of this report for information regarding
these facilities,
8
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 185 of 266
43.8 Petroleum Contarni at = Detail Report
The FDEP Petroleum Contamination Detail Report (PCDR) lists facilities that have
reported petroleum discharges to the FDEP. The following facilities are within one-half
mile of the subject Property and have reported discharges of petroleum to the State:
i Pine Ridge Middle School
North Naples Fire Control
Moorings Park
Please refer to Section 3.2.2 and 4.2 of this report for information regarding these facilities
4.3.9 Groundwater Management System
The Groundwater Management System (GMS -80) lists permitted solid, domestic, and
industrial waste facilities registered with the FDEP.
The FDEP Groundwater Management System, Solid Waste Facilities directory was
reviewed to identify potential landfills or waste dumps in the study area. There are no
facilities listed in this database which are fvifhin one iialfmileofthe subject property.
4.4 PHYSICAL SETTW
The USGS 7.5 minute topographic map (see Appendix E) of the study area was reviewed
. and indicated that the topography of the study area is flat with no large hills or valleys that
might aid in the potential migration of hazardous substances and/or petroleum
hydrocarbons. Based on elevation. contours observed on the topographic map, the subject
Property is approximately 10 to 15 feet above sea level. No potential sources of impact to
the subject property were identified from the topographic map review.
4.5 HISTORICAL I 1cE INFORMATION
The 1975, 1981, 1985, 1989, 1993, 1996, and 1998 aerial photographs of Section 10,
Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida were observed to identify the
extent and nature of recent land uses. The aerial photographs are public documents
available from the Collier Coun Property P y APpraisefs Office. A copy of the aerial
photograPh is provided in Appendix F of this report.
The subject property was observed as undeveloped land m each of the aerial photographs
reviewed. Residential development, roads, and trails were evident in the study area in the
1975 aerial photograph. Based on the aerial photograph review, no evidence was observed
to suggest that former site and study area activities represent potential sources of
environmental impact to the subject property. No evidence of environmental impact was
observed during the aerial photograph review.
R
3
}
Agenda I`em No. 17C
July 27. 2010
i
Page 186 of 266
4.6 C OF TITiE REVIEW
Title Information concerning the subject property has not been provided to CEC as of the
date of this report. Title Information can be reviewed to identify former owners, leases,
easements, and land uses of the site and to determine if any environmental cleanup liens
have ever been placed on the property. If requested, CEC will review this document and
provide the results as an addendum to this report.
4.7 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Aerial photographs, USGS Quad Maps, and interviews with client provided CEC personnel
documentation regarding a historical perspective for the study area.
z
CEC interviewed Mr. Steve Hilaer of Environmental Risk Management. Mr. Hilfiker vvas
unaware of any potentially contaminating land uses at the subject property. No evidence of
environmental impact was obtained from the interview with Mr. Fiilfiker.
R
3
}
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 187 of 266
REFERENCES
TRW -REDI Property Data Realty Atlas, Collier County, Florida, 27th Edition, 2000.
I USGS Naples North Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series (TopograPhic },1958, photorevised 1987.
4
11
T
I
H
0
I
I
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 188 of 266
�w
Iq
c
SECTION 10, TOWNSAUP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
I=
ff
r
f
Subject
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 189 of 266
LAU"
, le,
_R
-7- —1 IllaannlY
12;;9100 F& PARCEL LOCATED AT CORYM OF GOODLMW AND pnff RIDGE
DEM. KWM
EM KWM SITE LOCATION MAP
FM 1: 00.463 COASTAL- ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
m
-w
ACAD
N.T.s
I OF I
00.463
LA
7.
I=
ff
r
f
Subject
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 189 of 266
LAU"
, le,
_R
-7- —1 IllaannlY
12;;9100 F& PARCEL LOCATED AT CORYM OF GOODLMW AND pnff RIDGE
DEM. KWM
EM KWM SITE LOCATION MAP
FM 1: 00.463 COASTAL- ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
m
-w
ACAD
N.T.s
I OF I
00.463
Pb Env Risk Mgmt Inc
:43 FAX:941 348 172( PAGE
1`L:W NL1: n, 171JU11:UNUlIN (lll (:. )W91 ❑.!'.1M'I b, I:NI Oki 1::+•
Slrlt \'1;114: �, I, q N I'IKI:A IT A It I 1 1111 �1 ti, { IINti I'Kl,lt 111 .N t`t.1N 1111.!1:.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
7 Page 190 of 266
Dftx+ptian of pert of
Soafim 10, Rwo UNAmhip 49 Smith,
25 ftM Collier C--(Y. Florida
(Parcal "AU)
All Omt pact of Swdou 1Q Townstdp 4A South. Range 2S
Pa""YtY dOtMU-4 a ttdbws: � Collier Qwq Florida. being more
C � 4G at tbacorahaly 1/4 cam*r od Saban IP T'OWW*49 Sogl R�25 E. Coliior
dw4o tho �d +rol fh south 1/4 ration line of mid Seario,l 10, Norsh 01.16 35` Wea 69.14 4et to a Poft CM
desm1bed; y ndsry of Flrte Rito Road (S.R. 896) and the FO1N'f OF BRomrNi3 or1Jw paronl Irerdat
d* °f Alan r* 11 ery. Baum BYpyS_ Wct 9 �7 toes m a point ofalwvxwe as rbe Y
Public Records oft oilier t OD m"ZhtbFwly as NwI ded m Plat Book 13, PW 58 of tW
OWI ew ft sw, d r1 of MW 414'8 lit* "S the arc oft *OWW pwv comave me ees. having 4
heart North 0494g 48e SW 345. � a07$b of 04-34'51 "end bnitle txmbnded � a otrord wAiM
�ooe �.aald ie acid rigffi of'vay Norm 07°06'13" Eaet 110202 few
tbmo 1
P� of land dwartbed inn OjL g Book- S09 RP t 7B3.fiS (tai to apaint on fhe borpdmy of the
F>�i 41=9 decdbed in Oj Bo Boltth 00°4th4" 13aat 1324 29 � to a Pmt on the 6oq
thenoe alo% said boundoy SSou1d03i 7. psaw 11602 -1605; marY aFtlm
? " theme alp aaW Weft 190'0 fst
said line nt P R E bo+mdap soulfi 00°4624" 5ast 23240 fat � the nortisoriy bonhday of
Ridge Road;
dwr= along the wmdmtyy t m4my of Pine Ri "
w Point on the nortNwath I /4 cedion dCo Reed, Norm 8D'3525 Wnt 779.46 few to 4
Ptsrel llaoi0 dewnl)ed; tine of tinsti� 1p the POINT OF BEC3p »p of the
boa oonstme 3w Grass mow or less,
Subject to easemcnra, reatrlt dm and
BearLtyq are baaod on the nortbenly ions of remrd
WMdary of Pine Ridgo Road (SR 896) baiag Sawk "52T Were
wllstlt4' t �1 BAxrON & FWX, INc
�1�'ded >'rn8inecrs and Load Sorveyuty
lY�i1 ram 1< B °rrnan, PS.M.45086
Certifiaue6faudwrrro{jorlI.B -4'43.
Not Valid unJms embmw With the Pmfesslatal's Beal,
Rof. 2Cr-496
W.O.: 00011- DON -SR V -000OD
Dam: April 17, 199$
.WLLaSN, b11ER, RA HYi N 4200 IWI W , 1No.
1hJ. Nn �.
l:/m Sne .,w.c,.lhowrtllnf'� , F(..ri�J 141 MR'07 • 141 W 1.64"4010 Fr, 04149 3_%_l 16
ara01100et,ars NnPlca Poor AI G' ^rYi IwPkvpnil..nmlll.".:wn
w r 4v °y "^ Rrtulwnml
"NOY -3D�00 TffU 01:53 N FROM:
7D:En9 RiRF U" "12.01 '00 17:33
nr n
P.
M
C
v
f
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 191 of 266
1'LflNNtl.ItY, �:NYII(pNalaiN IS11•l �•INM IUANTS, rN1,1:4LL1kt4.
StIRV1;v0KI,, 1.AI40 L'-.pa /tjw1)1'rLcra. l.•LINn'rttt IL'lll/N MAN1111-6b
Douriow of pmt of
SecS A7 la, tlwnship 49 South.
Rano 2S asv4 Collier oft*, eIt>rlda
ftc4 w•T
AB drat pmt of 8auion )0, Totuec}dp 49 Swtdl/ Rego Z5 Blot, Collier Cheery Florida, b ft more
pmskulmiy dumbed as fellows
COtrNUCIN0 at In sl> ghetly 114 earner of Station 10. T xmhlp 49 Sott6 Range 25 EaR. Copier
Cattle% Florida;
ffi
them Wtl h•SOUth U4 000M fine of said Sm6lm 10, Nmth 01.18'35" Wes 69.79 feet to a pond on
tt� nW"f waY of pine Ridge Road (S.R.1%}
theme alo%Said bo MdWy- South 89'07'Sr Wert 957 fedto a point ofoutVI&M on lilt testy rWk of
way of ?to* Btxdevand. 100 foci 4&h4ot' -way ae rwwded In Piet Book 13. RM 53 oftlte public Reoads of
CoBler Ccuety. Florida;
thtnea 311008 288 410 of way 454.08 feat along the am safe oirLatar omvc am'oaWve do aan, heft a MtHus of
5679.65 Saar Vffdugh a. antral mWc of 04°34'51' and bchV Wubtaded by a chtrd which bears North
04°,46'48" part 45396 fact:
*MW torabtwa alone Said d 't�wN'Nos1tIIT.�6'13 " -Eas -1 IOt7, 2 fmM ad the POINT or
BBGNRNG of the, pmmlhemindumbed,.
limns oardmunr8 Bang acid rigbtwf -weer Nash 07"0613" 1Gm 782,59 feet
t6eoet lokft said 600-or-way Noah 89'29'57" Beat 676.40 font Loa pond an the hamdwy of the
parod of lead dumbed In QR. Back 503, page 206:
few= Wang held boor dory South OOW74N But 775,71 feaq
ttema kava8 wit bourdmy SO* 89`29'57 Wea 783 AS fret to W pojM on Ibc cute {y rW4.of-
way lip of said Frank baulovmd and the POINT OF BEGN M of the panel het dr& tL
1'areal coulaim 13,00 acres otme or ku.
Stdytxr to emsetnoafs, rrtsaimmw and roatrvAloeR of ron.
BtmrleV on ba d an *s northerly hemothuy lint of PhtoUp Road (SR 896) bean, Swtk 89035'25" We,
WiL,SClN, WLLBR. SA&TON 6. MEK. INC
RtA*gft d•.= ae+nta& wdd/1.mtd Sumoe
- �4':�•ya oC d �o
L. Barmen, p.S.b, fl 5086
,'a= ertifiaale
Of wgtorLVAM LB -443.
Nof�+ailid upkU aanbossed with tam PmfassiM rs a.L
Alf. 2G496
W.D.: 0w 1 l -WN,$RV- 0000')
Aso. April 17, 1998
WILII[IN, M4LnR. 1iAttTUIH & pSEF, INtb
t�D HYi4ry L.u.c.
'"-20M Norirs, Fi..ri.&, M IM JiSt7 • Iq1 4ilfi•t4.{ege A: R41.6gS.571 n
W'k s7uY v»...rtiY,nina4n,o+r�/
a:.,wl: MPIw•Orr14wT111Y..y,ry1
tl ^"'. YCO 1'i1fl.lu I'.M AIY.'IT 1r /. /IYItX IMYa.•I.hH,
NOV -30 -00 T1fV 01:54 PM FROM:
rn•cYe tt.t. u 12!01 '00 17r33�
a
s
z
FRI 05:44 PM Env $i"jt.Mgmt 1nC
DITHUI 13:43
FAS:941 348 172[
t'L.1N HI:RI. 1111 \ "11 <I INnIPAI4 talkpl 11.1kN 11, Ii4L 11,41'1 lta.
til LC Vlil t,llti, I•kNI 4' +�'.A l'L �1 et 'III 11.. Imo, t:. ,NX1 Ht 4:I 1,1K h1nk A�;IACv
Section M Township 9 Agugtt of
CaiOerC � ss �"`
loony. Florida
(Access Rom"Wt4)
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
PAGE 4 Page 192 of 266
AU that pert of sme iz 10. Towmhip 49 $MUh, 21
PtrdmLb ly described as fmowat �Be [ w Collier ooaynq Plartda being mate
CommmiCING at the Mmdmdy 114 coma of &union 10. TOWnshll149 Sonde. Pmp 25 EM ColHe4
Comrty. Florida;
thettoe alms fhb nor01-muth 114 2eedan line of Enid S.W. 10. Nosh 01"18'35 WeQ 69.79 feet to a Torino on
the ttort WIY boundary of Pine Ridge Road (6.R. 9W.
tharrce Frog acid mead, IO fcoj 89ro7'S2" Wet 9.57 fed to a point of ettrvahne an the �y rig*.Qp
way er Frank , Flarvard 100 foot t15ht,of way as recorded In plat Book 13, Page 58 of the public &=much of
Collier Camay, Flrrtda;
d/0Me northosEterly along said right of way 454.08 fear ek% the tuc of a circular emva ctatcava aa9terly.
hears North of 5679.65 tam+ dtroucb a central angle of 04°34'51 "and being aubtooded by a r� wbiah
W48'4911 Best 4$3.96 feet;
thatch mmum h aioleg EeW Ml bl of way North 07 °06'13'.6W.8b L19S=%D flte.PO= op RRG(AAUAi(i
of the easctaatu htrdn tlesoribed;
ri"°a lal'* aFd 6914 -0f'w ' Southeasterly 39.35 fed along the arc of A noniaaplttWI einatiar
icing Eutaandtsd by which bum South 3� Zan' 8°°� a mit+sl angle of 84'57'30" and
ihenea Scum ,2°51'17" Ban 106.99 Boor; Fad 23.34 teas;
thaneC madteamdy 164.02 fm Fmtg the ate of a nmt4sager W c,=kr wave Concave southerly,
having a radios of 119440 fear, t ftglh a abNral angle of 07052714" red being eubgended by 11 chord
which bear; Scum 77°21'54" pat 163.g9 f�m
thence South 70047'53" E= 15448 fat;
thence aoud,eatlaly 340-09 feet alaug the ors of a not_mapnod airaller Au oaocave norulerly.
htvkC a nldim of756M feel, thrailgh a eamal angle of
which beam S 18° 11'47 "and bring au�rmded by a chard
South 79°53'02" pmt 739,04 tb r
theme North 89'1SZ3' Past 149.97 Ecet:
liana South 00.4624° Past 64.00 feet.
drmax south 89°1523" Wets 150.96 fox+:
thence nonhwastarly 261.42 feet along the ant of a trop tarCbWW circular curve eoncava norther!
hating a radius of 820,00 fed, thrown a central angle of 18'15'50" and being eubtanded a or
whlcb bears North 79'SS'09" WeE 26032 Poar; try chord
thence North 70.47'53" Wat 152.98 feet;
h11mce mnrthwesre> lY 152.92 fear along nhe am of a nrn4a,rgplpgl eimalor ourva CaOOave aogttterty,
rag th bm of 11 36hD tad, ih+ou�t a centre! 21810 of 07°45'13" and being subronded by a
chord wilds boars North 77'21.48" WON 15280 ix't;
thwceNtuih 82 °51'17" Walt 106..03 ON
melts sornhwesterly 39.29 feet along the arc of a tangential eimWar curve
having a radius of 35.00 foal, througb a ctv" angle of b 'W"awiy,
which bans South 52°07'28' Wont 35.77 fat to a 90'OY40" and bcMg subtaafad by a chord
Goodieua•Frmik Road; Pant o0- and eaaterty Rela-of -way 11m or
W II.ti.,N, }.qi I.L ER. BANION & PEEK. IN,%
3-wo Axi47 ZDO, 14Ap4=, R,Ada 34105.a507 + ph 941
W"t'lm" W.+�..Iln, "�•llwaom '�'IO N 941 - 64.1.5716
Nard.. li."ML ^'rileq'"a,�Mdkcehn
'w'Iat+58a5a0e1,aEE
NOV -30-00 THU 01:54 PM FROM:
.0-r my ..... +m' N"ul "n ".
TO:Env Risk 1;12!21. 00 17:�'%E 4
a
Agenda Rem No. 17C
July 27, 2010
DEC -01 -00 FRl 05:44 PM Env Risk Mgmt lie FAX:941 346 172 PAGE 5 Page 193 of 266
NOV. -30' 00(TH0) 13:44
P,005
�TIOe OPPALT6
LION K>�NlPpSg1}71
WAC�6 LL17i.0YLtlIRLblllfl: M.Mn&
t/.[cecc eea6yrxR eqn�
bmw
A7Y line 1Votth 07°D6' is" SW 114A s a to the POINT C)F BIio1NNM
7 Pared commits 13 etsos more or 1
r Subject Mosoetns, MM;Cs1a11a MW roWI"ow of=md
8"' ere 6*d 0104 twrNh* boundary Jim n{ Pine Ridge P-ad (SR 996) belne 864th S9 35"ZS• p,
1 i8uJ3nA1 & Mr,1NC,
�taec:and Laad Run,.,.w..
i1 q'aiion LB4 43.
Not VOW iadesi embossed wrth da PeogAWMaPs MW.
RAC 20 -512
W.O.: o2SS5- 0004)M -pLHRW
DWI% Aargrtg 4,1M
I
Z
r
NOV -30 -00 THU 01:54 PM FROM:
WILSON''r MI1.1.Ex
TO:Env Risk jgj?41 '00
j DEC -01-00 FRI 05:44 PM Env E.; '.,Mgmt Inc
NOV. -30' 0017NUI 13:44
'T
0-i L�
J glj
3 wa�9
F4;941 348 1720
x
tj
Mal; 1111 ,41111
0
v
:a
0
BOV -3000 TW 01:54 PW F90Y:
70;Lnv $isk Vtd 112/01 '00 '00 17 ^33
rwue
r
a
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
PAGE 6 Page 194 of 266
P. 006
LM
5
o C.
�i
/ WM�VIti Ln,�j• �.
�
4
!
tY
05
C
f
$t
R
'
F
• J
BOV -3000 TW 01:54 PW F90Y:
70;Lnv $isk Vtd 112/01 '00 '00 17 ^33
rwue
r
a
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
PAGE 6 Page 194 of 266
P. 006
LM
5
o C.
�i
DEC -01 -00 FR1 05:44 Pk Env P ; -* Mamt lac
NOV. - ;0' 00 (TIM) 13:44
T
f
-3
C_
i 4at
11114,111,
1107-30.00 TH0 01:55 M FROM:
N
1w;
a1
fit it
it
FAX:941 348 172
A�
; V R
rC
r p
r ^i
4 S
€
fill
3' 301
It
4 N
MUT Risk Nut 112`'01 00017:33
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 195 of 266
PAGE 7
F, 007
h
04
a
k
y
C
C
MUT Risk Nut 112`'01 00017:33
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 195 of 266
PAGE 7
F, 007
I
i
3
Z
i
APPENDIX B
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE OBSERVATION GUIDE
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 196 of 266
Lod
C
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 197 of 266
` COASTAL -
ENGINEERING Ga CIO Enual O"
cwa Enpinaeilnv
CONSULTANTS En i b
INCRata Eno's Aa grog
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE OBSERVATION GUIDE
Site Name _U developed Parcel at Goodlette and Pine Ridge Job No.: 00.463
Address/Location: NE Comer of Goodlette Road and Pine Ride Road Naples k7orida
Site Interview(s) with:
Completed by: Kevin W. McLean Signature: !,>,,, V. ` k is Date: 1217/00
The observation guide follows the CEC due diligence definition in scope, purpose, and inteuL CEC
conducts the following observations during each site reconnaissance. However, each site has
unique cbmwteristics and a standard checklist may restrict subjective analysis. Thus, notes were
3 made and photographs were taken where necessary for each observation.
A. GENERAL SITE OBSERVATIONS
1. Property Description:
( ) buildings (X) undeveloped land ( ) fenced
( ) occupied (X) unoccupied ( ) flow drains
( ) city sewer ( ) septic system (X) boundaries identified
a(
( ) city water ( ) well water
( ) paving & utility improvements
2. Land Use(s): Undeveloped band
3. Former Land Use(s): Undeveloped Land
B_ SPECIFIC SITE OBSERVATIONS:
PROPERTY CONDITION LOCATION AND SIGNIFICANCE
1. Underground storage tank None Observed
vent pipes or fill caps
Agenda Item No, 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 198 of 266
2. Aboveground storage'`wAU
and containment
k]
b 4.
i
5.
6.
7.
8.
r 9
6.
Discolored ground
and/or stressed vegetation
Storage containers and/or
55 gallon drums
Liquids (standing, flowing
discolored, odorous)
Odors (solvent,
petroleum, etc.)
Hills, mounds, depressions,
or evidence of burial
None Observed
None Observed
None Observed
None Observed
None Observed
None Observed
Evidence of heavy equipment None Observed
or truck activity
Septic Tank, drainfield, None Observed
odors
T
10. Age ofbuilding(s),
potential asbestos (ACM
A
11, Raw materials transportation None Observed
area, shipping and receiving
12. Potentially hazardous None Observed
substances used
13. Hazardous waste generation, None Observed _
quantity, permits
CEC Environmental Site Observation Guide
Page 2 Date % initial
C
C
l'
a
r
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 199 of 266
14. Hazardous waste treatment, None Observed
storage, and disposal
15. Chemical spills, leaks,
or releases and quantity
16. Electrical transformers or
capacitors and PCB's
17. Pesticides, herbicides,
pool chemical storage
18. Solid waste disposal,
garbage, or dumping
19. Bodies of water, sheens
discoloration, -or pollution.
20. Wastewater treatment
operations
Unlisted Observations/Notes:
None Observed
No Evidence of PCB's
None Observed
None Observed
None Observed
None Observed
CEC Environmental Site Observation Guide
Page 3 Date lz oo initial ��
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 20'10
Page 200 of 266
C. SITE vICIl\TT'I'Y
The adjacent and nearby properties were observed for specific environmental concerns.
PROPERTY CONDITION LQATION AND SI NIPICANCE
(Details, distance and direction)
1 AdJwent Property, Land NP-4h: North Naples United Methodist Church
use description East: Pine Ridge Mi4ae School North Naples E= QOnfrol
South: Pine Ridge Road. Residential _
West: Goodlette Roa RPsid ntial
2• Facilities suspected Pine Ridge Middle School
of potentially contaminating North Naples Fire Qonkol
the site and address,
explain evidence
3. Dominantlnpdvses _ . -f ommercial
(industrial, residential, etc.) Undeveloped
& site vicinity Residential
general descnption
E
t
Notes:
F
E
CEC Environmental Site Observation Guide
Page 4 Date 1 Initial /)c,,_
i
r.
e
APPENDIX C
COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 201 of 266
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
CEC File No. 00.463 Page 292 of 266
'Copy
West portion of the subject property-
..uilb u0served in the southwest portion of the subject property,
4aw
Iq
C
-
AV-
�
{
L�jy'Ef
MA��
grJ�'K�'� .T•X {
H
8
4
J
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 204 of 266
c
�p
iF
i
Agenda !'ern No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 205 of 266
MARKET DEVELOPMENT REPORT
PROPERTY
INFORMATION
CLIENT
INFORMATION
00463
1r� ntlb
40 Acres at Int of Goodlette Rd
A) Databases searched to 1 mile:
US EPA NPL National Priority List
and Pine Ridge Rd
0
Naples, FL 34109
0
Latitude/Longitude: 26212326.61.791395
0
Site Distribution Summary
Agency / Database - Type of Records
mas
v mxe
1r� ntlb
r mb
A) Databases searched to 1 mile:
US EPA NPL National Priority List
0
0
0
0
US EPA CORRACTS RCRA Corrective Actions and
(TSD) associated TSD
0
D
0
D
STATE SPL State equivalent priority list
- - 0
0
0 -
' 0
8) Databases searched to 112 mile:
STATE SCL State equivalent CERCUS list
0
D
0
US EPA CERCUS / Sites currently of formerly under review
NFRAP by US EPA
0
0
0
US EPA TSD RCRA permitted treatment, storage.
disposal facilities
0
_
0
0
STATE LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
2
1
0
STATE SWLF Permitted as solid waste landfalls,
incinerators, or transfer stations
0
0
0
C) Databases searched to 1/4 mile:
STATE UST Registered underground storage tanks
3
1
STATE AST Registered aboveground storage
tanks
2
t
NOTES
For more information Call VISTAInfC at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID! 000000463 Date of Report: December 4, 2000
VW*n 2.7 Page 17
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 206 of 266
Site Distribution Summary I awhw 1/a T/br0
11I fa 71210
mae iN mee 7!1 moo 1 m99
Agency / Database - Type of Records
i
0) Databases searched [0 7/8 mile:
US EPA 'ERNS Emergency Response Notification
— S tam of son's 0
US EPA LG GEN RCRA registered large generators of
hazardous waste
VS EPA SM GEN RCRA registered small generators of 0
hazardous waste T
STATE SPILLS States iIB list a -
A ( -) Indicates a distance not searchetl.
LIMITATION Or UA UTY
Civ MrIar P=aads at Us own ddf in'h"*'g to raft' 0n VRTA Ve W-L in whey w h e
cannel bean *suer ei tha accuracy of dw: kdwmed0n, an0rs a P M1 Pr° 10 PrOCeadbg wM any trasaaC6DIL VISTA
Mbtad cOmPenha, 0'**M agen0, eetpleyees and htl 0Cra4ng N camrafim of date, a rar 0uyyner's u ef dau. VLFA and W
0r Mrarad b audaaer n:rvhln dk sx ardka kdn a yNnatbn oWded 8et>la for axuracy, aorage, delmy. bu
VISTA
NOTES
Fot more informaTion call VISTAinfo at T - 800 - 767 -
Report ID: 000000463 0403.
version 2.7 Date of Report December 4, 2000
Page 12
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 207 of 266
MARKET DEVELOPMENT REPORT
Map of Sites within One Mile
.... .......
N
....
Eugenio Or
an Or
Worth S1
Pine
''Ila e Ln
J lvd
B
nywo d
on s Lr
I ISO St
Sewor
Ave
Her
4
S ro e
d
i
Pine Rid
Rd
i
A
Myrtle Te
I Crean Or
a
U
1O—r—nFMW
)r W
ti
n D�!.
L n
dEnio
n Wood
:y
n
C-ated Streit
hom
I've
L
[inch Way
o
n
5k
zr
C3
riole C;r
e olit n Wo
$t
Pine Grove
Ln'
o
ri Dr
t e Hatch
n
PC(
FMornin side
cr
t Ln
I
0 11.25 05
a off oincionc Di --- Miles
Sub)"at 840
Category.
Databases Searched to:
A
mi.
C; 0
112
Single Sites
+
mi. 1/4 mi. 1/8 mi.
W
411
Multiple Sites
♦
0 � 0
Highways and Major Roads
NPL, SPL,
CERCLISI LIST
Roads
Railroads
CORRACTS
(TSD)
NFRAP• ERNS, GENERATORS
TSD,LUST,
Rivers Or Water Bodies
SWLF, SCL
For more Information Call VISTAinfo at I
. 800 •767. 0403
Report ID: 000000463
Date of Report; December 4, 2000
Page 93
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 208 of 266
MARKET DEVELOPMENT REPORT
DESCRIPTION OF DATABASES SEARCHED
A) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1 MILE
NPL VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile or your property.
SRC#; 19 The agency release date for National Priorities List was Au
gust, 2000,
The NPL Report is the US EPA"s registry of the nation§ worst uncontrolled or abandoned
hazardous waste sites. NPL Sites are targeted Fm possible long -term remedial action
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensaticn; and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1goo.
F SPL VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile of your property.
SRC #; 216 The agency release date for State - Funded Action Sites was November, 1998.
This database is provided by the Department of Environmental Protection. Bureau of
- Information Systems. The agency-may be contacted at: a50- 486-0190.
CORRACTS VISTA conducts a database search to iden
SRC7i: 14 tify all sites within 1 mile of your properly.
The agency release date for RCRIS Corrective Action Sites was March, 2000.
RCRIS -TSDC
SRC #:556
The CORRACTS database contains information concerning RCRA facilities that have
conducted, or are cunendy conducting a corrective action. A Corrective Action Order
is issued pursuant to RCRA Section 3008 (h) when there has been a release of hazardous
waste or constituents into the environment from a RCRA facility. CDRBctive actions may
also be imposed as a requirement of recelving and maintaining a TSDF permit.
VISTA conducts a database search to identify an sites within 1 mile of your property.
The agency release date for RCRIS TSDs Subject to Corrective Action was March, 2000.
The EPAS Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program Identifies and
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA
Facilities database 6 a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation,
storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA TSDCs are
treatment. storage and /or disposal facilities that are subject to corrective action under
RCRA.
For more Information cap VISfAinfo at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 000000483
Va'aUn 1.7 Date of Report: December 4, 2000
Page o'4
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 209 of 266
0) DATABASES SEARCHED To 1/2 MILE
CERCLIS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within.1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 17 The agency release date for Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Uablity Information Sys was August, ZDDD.
The CERCLIS database is a comprehensive fisting of known or suspected uncontrolled or
abandoned hazardous waste sites. These sites have either been investigated, or are
currently under investigation by the U.S. EPA for the release, or threatened release of
hazardous substances. Once a site Is placed in CERCLIS, it may be subjected to several
levels of review and evaluation, and ultimately placed on the National Priorities List
(NPL).
NFRAP VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 112 mile of your property.
SRC*, 16 The agency release date for No Further Remedial Action Planned was August, 20oo,
The No Further Remedial Action Planned Report ( NFRAP), also known as the CERCLIS
Archive, contains information pertaining to sites which have been removed from the V.S.
EPAt CERCLIS database. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial
Investigation, either no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly
without need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious
enough to require federal Superfund action or NPL consideration.
y SCL - VWAconducts a database search to loan* all siteswlthln 112 mile of-your property.
SRC#: 209 The agency release date for Sites Database was October, 1991.
This database is provided by the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of
Information Systems.
RCR1S -TSD VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 112 mile of your property.
k SRC#: 12 The agency release date for RCRIS Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities was March,
zoou.
The EPAS Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA
Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation,
storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA TSDs are
faciri les which treat store and /or dispose of hazardous waste.
SWLF VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 112 mile of your property.
SRC #: 23 The agency release date for USGS Solid Waste Landfills was December, 1991,
This database is provided by the United States Geological Survey. The agency may be
contacted at: 703 -646 -5613.
For more information cal VISTAinfo at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 000000463
Ve Date of Report: December 4, 20
\( rsrpn 1J 00
Page e5
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 210 of 266
SWLF VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC #: 219 The agency release date for Solid Waste facilities was August, 20oo.
This database Is provided by the Department of Environmental protection. The agency
may be contacted at: 650- 922.7121.
LUST VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC #: 225 The agency release date for petroleum Contamination Tracking Syieem was August,
2000.
This database is provided by the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of
Information Systems. The agency may be contacted at: 850. 922.7121. Be advised that
some states do not require registration of heating oil tanks, especially those used for
residential purposes,
C) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1/4 MILE
UST VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/4 mile of your property.
SRC #: 222 The agency release date for Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring System was August,
2000.
This- databaseir provided by the Depanmencoffrnlconmentefi Protection ,-Bureau of
Information Systems. The agency may be contacted ac 850 - 922.712'1. Be advised that
Lr some states do not require registration of heating oil tanks, especially those used for
€ residential purposes.
€ AST VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 114 mile of your property.
SRC#: 223 The agency release date for Storage Tank Contamination Monhoring System was August,
2000.
This database Is provided by the Department of Environmental protection.
Information Systems. The agency may be contacted at: 850- 922 -7121. Bureau of
D) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1 /8 MILE
ERNS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/8 mile of your property.
SRC#: 8 The agency release date for Emergency en Response espouse Notlflcadon System was August, 1999,
ERNS is a national Computer database system that is used to store information on the
sudden and /or accidental release or hazardous substances, including petroleum, into
the environment. The ERNS reporting system contains preliminary information on specific
releases, including the spill location, the substance released, and the responsible party.
For more information call VISTAinfe at 1 - 600 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 00D000463
vaiion 2J Date of Report: December 4, 2000
Page /6
T
r
7d
IL
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 211 of 266
RCRA -LOG VISTA conducts a database search to Identify all sites within 1 /8 mile of your property.
SRC#: 16 The agency release date for RCRIS Large Quantity Generators was March. 2000.
The EPAls Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA
Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation,
storage. transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Large
Generators are facilities which generate at least 1000 kg. /month of non - acutely
hazardous waste (or 1 kg. /month of acutely hazardous waste).
RCRIS -SQG VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/8 mile of your property.
SRC#: 15 The agency release date for RCRIS small tluaritity Generators was March, 2000,
The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA
Facilities database is a Completion by the EPA of facilities which report generation.
storage, transportation. treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Small Quantity
Generators are facilities which generate less than 1000 kg. /month of non - acutely
hazardous waste.
SPILLS VISTA conducts a database search to Identify all sites within 1/8 mile of your property.
SRC#: 215 The agency release date for SPIU was January, 1999.
This database is provided by the Department of Community Affairs. The agency may be
contacted at: 850.413 -9929.
End of Report
For more information call VISTAinfo at 1 - 8D0 - 767 - 0403.
qW Report 000000463 Date of Report: December 4, 2000
Version 2.7 7 Page A7
0
3
S�
Facility Name
Facility Address
1 North Naples Fire Control
1441 Pine Ridge Rd
Naples, FL 34109
2 Collier County - Pine Ridge Middle
1515 Pine Ridge Rd
Naples, FL 34109
3 Uncle Bob's Screen Print
1410 Pine Ridge Rd
Naples, FL 34109
3 Shepard Son Inc
1380 Pine Ridge Rd
Naples, FL 34109
4 Moorings Inc.
120 Moorings Park Dr
Naples, FL 34109
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 20',0
Page 212 of 266
Database Identified
LUST, UST /AST
LUST, UST /AST
GNRTR
UST /AST
LUST, UST /AST
K
�r
j
I
7S
i
�
M
r•
G•
.. P
• �jN P
Y •
n
♦ Q'
'J N
O
m ;
N
S ; USp
V SOw.a
�
m �
u4�..••
a
a•
N
°
e•
P GGp
e�ia'
a $m
mT
rig
e
P
:w9Sw
Y
$
SoT >i
• ti�`
1
Y r r•.
M
fO
N i n
~•�
q
M
• W
06k•M
S N
N
P
°'
♦ � a �
S �
yaP••
a�
2S
a
S
q
m
P
N
� r
d
m i
U
O
% m
¢
• ¢ N
'O
D
�
• m m n
• L W 2jw
cA. ;
ZH P F
a � N
A
e¢YeiW
.tli;Y
p
�• � Y
y
u�
r�
E
Y
ti
u
'
OP.
• N
C
A .
m �
M
uyqpp
AUK
V
a°
v m ;
i
a
Y
yo
m i r
t •
O
m • q
D ;
U L �
L A ;
w" r
O w
b •
Y r
Y � O
U � �
N �
Gn'i Y •
U 66
6 � L
C v .
r Y A •
u«.
g g >;
w � P
Y 4
iA u
r a ci •
� O ry
Lawton Chiles
Governor
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 214 of 266
Department-of J
!fit •,.,
Environmental ProteCf 1"n , ^ , lr~ ; o
Twin Towers Office Building
2600 Blair Scone Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32399,2400
Mr. Kenneth R. Rodgers
North Naples Fire
Control & Rescue District
1441 Pine Ridge Road
i Naples, Florida 33942
April 8, 1.996
Virgins B. v✓emerell
Secretary
RE: North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District
1441 Fine Ridge Road, Naples, Florida
Incident Date: March 20, 1996 - Deductible: $10,000
DEP Facility #118629394
Dear Mr. Rodgers:
The Department has completed its review of documentation
submitted for this site. The Department has determined that the
contamination related to the storage of petroleum products as
defined in Section 376.301(16), Florida Statutes (F.S.), at this
site is eligible for state - funded remediation assistance, under
the Florida Petroleum Liability and Restoration Insurance Program.
s Pursuant to 95 -2, Laws of Florida (LOF), and effective March
29, 1995, no further site rehabilitation work on sites eligible for
state assisted cleanup from the inland Protection Trust Fund shall
be eligible for reimbursement. For any site rehabilitation work
conducted prior to March 29, 1995, reimbursement may be requested
regardless of whether the program task is completed. In accordance
with 95 -2, LOF, future state assisted rehabilitation will be
dictated by the sites priority ranking score, and shall be
conducted on a pre - approval of scope of work and costs basis.
"The person responsible for conducting site rehabilitation,
or his agent, shall keep and preserve suitable records of
hydrological and other site investigations and assessments,
site rehabilitation plans, contracts and contract
negotiations, and accounts, invoices, sales tickets, or
other payment records from purchases, sales, leases or
other transactions involving costs actually incurred
related to site rehabilitation. Such records shall be
made available upon request to agents and employees of the
department during regular business hours, and at other
times upon written request of the Department. In addition,
the Department may from time to time request submission of
such site- specific information as it may require.
4
'-oroiea '.a'15erve ar'd manage F onda's uw,ronrnnm mrd Non:rnf Resourc -s"
FdMn d on ,,yd d paW.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
r Pa. e 215 of 266
Ci�-- ST "76
Department of
Environmental Protection
Twin Towers Office Btdlding
.leo Bush 2600 Risk Stone Road David B. Sauhs
Governor Tallahassee, Morids 32399.2400 Secretary
September 10, 1999
Mr. Jack R, Thompson
1441 Pine Ridge Road
Naples, FL 33942-2139
Re: North Naples City -Fire Control
FDEP Facility # 118629394
Discharge Date: March 20, 1996
Dear W. Thompson:
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection is rcgt&ed to direct the cleanup of
petroleum contamination sites m4mority.order and by preapproval of the scope ,and cost of all
work that is funded by the State. The priority order for cleanup is determined pursuant to the
.' Petroleum Cleanup Site Priority Ranking Rule, Chapter 62 -771, Florida Administrative Code.
Each site eligible for cleanup funding assistance is scored according to this system. The above
a site has received a score of 10. Each eligible site is ranked in relation to all other eligible sites.
Ranking and funding are performed by the DEP quarterly in February, May, August, and November of
-7 each year. Currently funding is available for all sites with a priority score of 50 or greater. Therefore,
funding is not available this year for continued rehabilitation at your site.
If you believe our records are in error or have any questions, please contact me at 850/224-
2599.
r"
Sincerely,
Terry D. Camp
USTM Operations Mana&r
Teas
Enclosure: PCT printout
cc: South Florida District DEP Office
/Art Tucker, Collier County PCD
File
"Protect, Conserve and Manage Rodda's Environment and Natural Resources"
Punted= recycled paper.
Agenda Item No. 17C
_ July 27, 2010
- - - Page 2' n of 2.66
ENVIRONMENTAL iSERVICEfdivc�`D
t ➢9L } � 10 iri 4: 05
March 21, 1996
Mr. Walter Temple Jr.
• n Specialist II
COMEnvironmental
r County
Pollution Control Department �--"
Building H
3301 East Tamiami Tmil
Naples, £L 33962 /
RE: UST CLOSURE ASSFSSMENT
North Naples City Fire Control and Rescue
1440 Pine Ridge Road
Naples, Florida 33947-;139
FDEP FACILTEY MQ 29394
CES Project #91770
Dear Mr. Wall=;
C ck Environmental Services, Inc. (CES) bas completed a Cloom Assessment for the above referenced facMy. All
""°`^'eot activities was performed in accordance with the requnments spai5ed in Chapter 62 -761, FAC, for
excavation and removal of underground fuel storage tmks.
This ad sa_M nt in cluded an evaluation of soils for hydrocarbon vapor coneentrations within the mnkhold and emavated
mam'a's. ltww deemed during the' exravatim and tank tamoval process, that mina impacts to soils bad oanxd
within the tankbold near the water able surface. The collection of groundwater samples for analysis was also perkrmed
40 as pan ofthis assesmeoc The groundwater sample collected from the Watbeter monitoring well (M contained 16 parts
perbillion benzene which exceeds drinl�g water standards. Otberpartmetas tested within accepabh: iitn"vs,
On behalf ofNotth Naples City Fm Curmol and Rescue this closwe assesnnmt
{ report has been submitted to the Collier
County Environ ncaud Protection Commission. It is mdcipated that limited site assesrmem and, ctlial action may
be nequned in aswdlliott with the UST removal performed at this facility.
Should you have any Questions regarding the enclosed report or if nay additional information is re
this office. gnired, plate coatsa
• Sioa y,
l
an Dow, P.E.
Project Engineer
cc: Mr. Kermeth Rodgers, North Naples F. C. K, w/ enc.
Mr. Larry Morrison, MTAC, w/ enc.
Corporate Office: P.O. Bet 10136, Wilmington, NC 28405 Telephone: (910) 256.8894
Central Florida Office: 1555 N. Maidand Ave, Maidan4 FL 32751 Telephone: (407) 834 -3378
Sourhwar Florida Of li P_0. Box 102, Fort Myea, FL 33902.0102 Telephone: (813)33Z.2298
IL
L
C
ow
i
t
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
o-,,,0 997 of 266
UST CLOSURE ASSESSMENT
FOR
NORTH NAPLES CITY FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE
1440 PINE RIDGE ROAD, NAPLES, FLORIDA 33942 -2139
FDEP FACILITY ID #8629394
CRS Project #95770
As requested and authorized by Mr. Larry Morison, MTAC, Clark Environmental Services, Inc.
(CFS) performed a closure assessment associated with the removal of a 3,000 -gallon and a 1,000 -
gallon underground gasoline storage tank (UST) at North Naples City Fire Control and Rescue,
1440 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida The property is a main station for the community fire
response and emergency rescue sevices.
The gasoline fuel underground storage tanks were located behind the firehouse on Pine Ridge Road
and within the property boundaries of the facility (Figure 1). The tanks are registered with the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for the storage and dispensing of unleaded
gasoline fuel from the 1,000 gallon tank and diesel fuel from the 3,000 gallon tank. As part of
planned fuel storage and disperser upgrades, the existing two USTs were excavated from the
tankhold, removed, and replaced with new above ground tanks. The findings of the closure
assessment are presented within this report
On Tuesday and Wenesday, March 19 and 20,1996, CES personnel performed closure assessment
services which included an a petroleum hydrocarbon vapor survey evaluation of excavated soils and
the collection and analysis of groundwater samples fitom the UST monitoring weeks. All sampling s its d
was peed iu accordance with CFss FDEP- approved Comprehensive Quality Assurance Plan
(CompQAP #930133G).
Soil samples were collected and screened in accordance with FDEP closure assessment guidelines
and Standard Operatmg Procedures (SOP). Samples were collected from specified horizons during
the excavation, and from the stockpile of excavated materials. All samples were screened using a
Sensidyne Organic Vapor Analyzer equipped with a Flame Ionization Detector (OVA -FID).
Headspace methodology was used to produce vapor concentrations for analysis. The results were
corrected for methane. The results of the soil screening evaluation, from locations noted on the site
map, are presented in Table I. The FDEP guidance level for excessively contaminated soils is 500
parts Per million (PPm) for gasoline and 50 ppn for diesel. Due to the proximity of the dispensers
and the tanks, no samples were collected from the pipe chase.
CLARK ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC.
F'
r
z
r
Eg
Agenda Item No, 17C
_ July 27, 2010
218 of 266
Four compliance monitor wells existed at this facility,, and were used for 1
th eak
�vh momtormg performed monthly by £aehouse detection purposes
measured and sampled concurrent with the initiation rs the UST T Water Ground eHS e
present at a depth of approximately seven feet below land surface. Ground water samples were
collected for evaluation of EPA Method 602 and 610 constituents,
This closure assessment was performed according to requirements of Rule 62- 761.800, FAC.
Contaminated soils with petroleum hydrocarbon vapor concentrations greater than 500 parts per
million were excavated from the tankhold and beneath the west dispenser, and stockpiled on
visqueen Soil samples were collected for "pre bum' analysis, and submitted to ENCO LaboratDries,
Orlando, Florida Analysis results have been received and cost estemates for' disposal of these materi t- Tire Collier County Pollution Control D are tm ut being sought
of disposal o£tbe petroleum contaminated sails, a epartanent will be notified
receipt certificate of disposal shall be provided upon
The groundwater sample collected from the southeast (SE) monitoring well contained 16 parts per
billion (PPb) benacm and exceeds
the other monitoring wells were wig g water standards. Groundwater samples collected from
acceptable limits.
Due to the concentrations of EPA Method 602 and 610 constituants in the soil and ground water
above aceptable levels and the proximity of the site to the Naples water supply wells it is anticipated
that further site assessment activities will be required FDEP.
All closure assessment report forms and a Site map noting tank placement and sampling locations,
have been prepared and are attached to this summary report,
CLARK ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
J
1 '
T
i
I
i
f
1
a
Y
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 219 of 265
TABLEI.
UST CLOSURE ASSESSMENT
FDEP FACrLrrY M # 5629394
OVA SO . C . REMNG DATA
NOTES: NA- NOT APPWCABLF
CLARK ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SBl
7.1
0
0
0
GAS DLSP.
3-4
0
0
0
6132
0.1
0
0
0
GAS FILL
3.4
1
0
1
Sal
0-1
0
0
0
GAS TANK
3.4
0
0
0
SB4
0-1
0
0
0
DTESEIMSP.
34
1
03
0S
SB5
0.1
0'
0
0
D13SMFUL
3.4
0
0
0
SB6
0-1
0
0
0
D163E1. TANS
3.4
0
0
0
SB7
4-5
1000
0
low
BETWEEN TAMPS
SBB
4-5
1100
0
1100
BETWEENTANKS
SB4
4-5
700
0
700
BETWEEN TAWS
SB10
3.5
0
0
0
NI WALL
SB1I
3 -5
0
0
0
E-457WALL
SBI2
3.5
90
10
80
SE WALL,
3.5
2
11
11
SE WALL, I FT.
SB13
3-5
15
0
is
SW WALL
SB14
3.5
7
0
7
WEST WALL
SR 1s
3 -5
6S
0
6.5
NW WALL
SD 16
NA
17
0
17
STOCKPILE
S817
NA
Is
0
IS
5 E
SB IS
NA
15
0 T
15
STOCY3Q.E
NOTES: NA- NOT APPWCABLF
CLARK ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
t
i
E4�
ax.
"- -86 FT,
UST AREA o
sT�cevl[[n
• w'' O sI u SOIL:::
7s
1440 PINE RIDGE ROAD
LEGEND
MONITOR YELL
Sv
S111L SAMPLE 1D ¢
SBI
DROP INLET
n
N
NOT 70 SCALE
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 220 of 266
SAMPLE LOGA7101,1S Sn ^10 O
x
SB15
NV X S9i
X
SB9
x
T DE
A
SB14
x
Si;2 ^I SBS
x ' i
SBS x
j'ISBI �� t
I Ic n`
SBIB xSE.R
FIGURE 1. SITE MAP FOP NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL AND
FACILITY 11) # 8629394
CES# 95770
%A AN r.NVTR0N1.4F.NTAI.,ERVICES.
A
IC
r
Environme;W Conservation Laboratories
10207 General Drive
Orlando, Rorida 32824
407 / 826-5314
Fax 407 / 850 -6945
CLIENT : Clark Environmental
,ADDRESS: 2260 Bay St.
Suite 11
Fort Myers, FL 33901
,ATTENTION: Lloyd Fox
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 221 of 266
Laboratories
OHfiS Ceriftat on NM 03316, E83182
REPORT # : OR3777
DATE SDEMITTED: March 22, 1996
DATE REPORTED : March 29, 1996
PAGE 1 OF 11
PROJECT MANAGER
Ccy A. Atkins
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Samples submitted and
identified by client as:
PROJECT #: 95770
�
(Oil
North Naples Fire Dept.
P
#1 - NE 03/19/96 1007
A.M.
#2 - NW 03/19/96 1045
A.M.
#3 - S£ 03/19/96 1030
A.M.
i
#4 - SW 03/19/96 1100
A.M.
#5 - S -1 03/20/96 1035
A.M.
#6 - TRIP BLANK
PROJECT MANAGER
Ccy A. Atkins
I
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 122 of 265
4W
ENCO LABORATORIES
REPORT # : OR3777
DATE REPORTED: March 29, 1996
PZFCRX*CE : 95770
PROJECT KLM3 : North Naples Fire Dept
PAGE 2 OF 11
r
r
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
EPA METSOD 602
i TVOLATILZ AROMATICS
NX
W
Units
Methyl tert-butyl ether
2 U
2 U
Fg /L
Benzene
Toluene
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
µg /L
µg /L
Chlorobenzene
1 U
1 U
Ag /L
Ethylbenzene
1 U
1 U
Ag /L
m- Xylene & p- Xylene
2 U
2 U
µg /L
o- Xylene
1 U
.1 .0
fig /L
1,3- Dichlerobenzene
1 U
1 U
µg /L
1,4- Dichlorobenzene
1,2- Dichlorobenzene
1 U
1 U
µg /L
1 U
1 U
Ag /L
% RECOV
RECOV
LIMITS
tSurrocatee
Bromofluorobenzene
100
106
64 -134
=Date Analyzed
C3 /23/96
03/23/96
U = Compound was analyzed for but not detected. /'
EPA METHOD 610 -
FPOLY AROMATIC EYDROCARBONS
�Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo (a) anthracene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Senzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
7ibenzo (a, h) anthracene
Fluoranthene
4Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3- cd)pyrene
'1- Methylnaphthalene
2 - Methylrnaphthalene
FNaphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Surroaete
2- Fluorobiphenyl
Date Fxtracted
>Date Analyzed
L
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 223 of 266
SNCO LABORATORIES
REPORT # t DR3777
DATE REPORTED: March 29, 1996
REFERENCE 95770
PROJECT NAME North Naples Fire Dept_
PAGE 3 OF 11
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
NE
Tm
Unit!!
10 U
10
U
µg /L
1.0 U
10
U
gg /L
10 U
10
U
Ag /L
10 U
10
U
{tg /L
10 U
10
U
Ag1L
10 U
10
U
µg /L
10.0
110
U
µg /L
10 U
10
U
µg /L
10 U
10
U
Ag /L
10 U
10
U
µg /L
10 U
10
U
µg /L
10 U
10
U
µg /L
10 U
10
U
Ag /L
10 U
10
U
µg /L
10 U
10
U
µg /L
10 U
10
U
µg /L
10 U
10
U
ug /L
10 U
10
U
µg /L
$ RECOV
74
03/24/96
03/25/96
T - Compound was analyzed for but not detected.
$ RECOV LIMITS
80 43 -137
03/24/96
03/25/96
P
-r
l
EPA KMTROD 602 -
To LATILB AROMATICS
Methyl tert -butyl ether
I.Merizene
oluene
Chlorobenzene
thylbenzene
- %ylene & p- %ylene
- %ylene
1,3- Dichlorobenzene
kk,2- Dichlorobenzene
,2- Dichlorobenzene
R ocate•
#Bromoiluorobenzene
EDate Analyzed
..g
's
2
Agenda I ±em No. 17C
July 27. 2010
Page 224 of ''66
ENCO LABORATORIES
REPORT # : OR3777
DATE REPORTED: March 29, 1996
RBFERSNCS : 95770
PROJECT NAME : North Naples Fire Dept_
PAGE 4 OF it
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
•
SP1
Units
16
2 U
kg /L
9
1 II
µg /L
1 II
1 U
Ag /L
1 U
1 U
Ag /L
1
1 U
µg /L
3
2 U
Ag /L
_I
1 U
lz5 /L
1 '0
1 U
Ag /L
1 U
1 II
µg %L
1 U
1 U
leg /L
% RECOV
fk BECOV'
LIMITS.
108
102
64 -134
03/23/96
03/23/96
U Compound was analyzed for,but not detected.
C
C
r
EPA METROD 610
POLY AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo W fluoranthene
C C
hrysene
ibenzo(a,h)anthracene
luoranthene
FluoreAe
Indeno(1,2,3- cd)pyrene
1- Methylnaphthalene
,, 2- Methylnaphthalene
°Naphthalene
3 Phenanthrene
Pyrene
SU=rRgate-
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Date Extracted
Date Analyzed
2NC0 LABORATORIES
REPORT # : OR3777
DATE REPORTED: March
PYAM ME 95770
PROJECT NAME North
PAGE 5 OF 11
RESMTS OF ANALYSIS
Agenda Item No, 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 225 of 266
29, 1996
Naples Fire Dept.
SE
SW
Units
10 u
10 (7
µg /L
10 u
10 u
µg /L
10 u
10 u
µg /L
10 u
10 u
Ag /L
10 u
10 v
Ag /L
10 U
10 u
µg /L
10 u
10.0
jig /L
10 u
10 u
µg /L
10 u
10 u
µg /L
10 17
10 a
yg /L
10 17
10 U
jcg /L
10 u
10 u
µg /L
10 u
10 u
µg /L
10 u
10 u
Ag /L
10 u
10 U
µg /L
10 a
10 a
µg /L
10 U
10 u
gg /L•
10 u
10 D
n/L
$ RECOV
k RECOV
LETS
67
63
43 -137
03/24/96
03/24/96
03/25/96
03/25/96
046V"' = Compound was analyzed for but not detected.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27. 2010
r Page 226 of 266
i
,SPA NISTSOD 602 -
VOLATILB AROMATICS
Methyl tert -butyl ether
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m- Xylene & p- Xylene
o- Xylene
1,3- Dichlorobenzene
1,4- Dichlorobenzene
1,2- Dichlorobenzene
Sur=oaate:
f Bromofluorobenzene
!. Date Analyzed
i
I
ENCO LABORATORS &9
REPORT # : OR3777
DATE REPORTED: March 29, 1996
REFSRBNCE 95770
PROJECT NAM North Naples Fire Dept.
PAGE 6 OF 11
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
TRIP BLANK
LAB 3
Units
2 U
2 U
jAg /L
1 U
1 U
Ag /L
1 U
1 U
µg /L
1 U
1 Ti
gg /L
1 U
1 U
µg /L
2 U
2 U
µg /L
1 .0
1 U
Uq /L
1 U
1 U
99 /L
1 U
1 U
A91L
1 II
1 U
Ag/L
$ RECOV
"CO
L1XZTS
104
03/23/96
106
03/22/96
64 -134
U = Compound was analyzed for but not detected.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 227 of 266
ENCO LABORATORIES
REPORT # : OR3777
DATE REPORTED: March 29, 2.996
REFERENCE : 95770
PROJECT NAME : North Naples Fire Dept_
PhGE 7 OF 11
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
EPA IMTHOD 8010A -
OLiA ILS HALOCARBONS
; -1
L." BLANK
II t
ichlorodifluoromethane
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
jhioromethane
inyl Chloride
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
romomethane
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
Ch]oroethane
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
richlorofluoromethane
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
1- Dichloroethene
125
U-D
125
U
D
pg / -Kg
Methylene Chloride
375
U
D
375
U
D
µg /Kg
1,2- Dichloroethene
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
,1- Dich2oroethene
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
chloroform
125
U
D
125
U
D
711 1,1- Trichloroethane
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
,Carbon Tetrachloride
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
1,2- Dichloroethane
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Rg
Trichloroethene
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
11,2- Dichloropropene
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
:Mromodichloromethane
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
c- 1,3- Dichloropropene
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
-t -1,3- Dichloropropene
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
1,1,2- Trichloroethane
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
Tetrachloroethene
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
,Dibromochloromethane
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
t.Chlorobeazene
romoform
125
U
D
125
U
D
Ag /Kg
1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane
250
U
D
250
U
D
µg /Kg
f1,3 -Di chlorobenzene
125
U
D
125
V
D
µg /Kg
1,4- Dichlorobenzeae
125
U
D
125
U
D
µg /Kg
1, 2 -Dichlorobenzene
125
U
D
125
V
D
µg /Kg
Surrogate:
RE COV
fk RECOV
LXMTTS
'Bromofluorobenzene
64
64
33 -144
.Date Analyzed
03/27/96
03/27/96
I
"D = Analyte value determined from a 1:125 dilution of the sample
= Compound was analyzed for but not detected.
v
D
Analyte value determined
from
Agenda I`em No. 17C
U
Compound was analyzed for
but
not detected.
July 27, 2010
Page 228 of 266
ENco LABORATORIES
REPORT #
: OR3777
DATE REPORTED= March 29,
1996
RSFEF.BCICE
95770
PROJECT HMO
North Naples Fire Dept.
PAGE 9 OF 11
z
t
RESMTS OF ANALYSIS
LZPA METHOD 8020A -
LA ILE AROMATICS
Sal
LAB BLANK
Units
Methyl tent -butyl ether
250 U D
250 U D
pg /Kg
enzene
125 U D
3500 D
125 U D
125 U D
pg /Kg
µg /Kg
toluene
Chlorobenzene
125 U D
125 U D
Ag /Kg
thylbenzene
2250 D
125 U D
250 U D
µg /Kg
µg /Rg
Xylene & P- Xylene
9000 D
4750
125 U D
µg /Rg
- Xylene
1,3- Dicblorobenzene
..D
125 U D
125 U D
µg /Kg
+$�L,4- Dichlorobenzene
125 U D
125 U D
125 U D
125 U D
µg /Kg
µg /Kg
X1,2- Dichlorobenzene
nurr0MtI -e:
% RED
As RECOV
LIMITS
Promoiluorobenzene
104
88
40 -170
Date Analyzed
03/27/96
03/26/96
-!EPA METHOD 9073 -
-TOTAL PETItOLEDM HYDROCARBONS
6-I
LAB BLAriTR
Units
Total Petr. Hydrocarbons
10
3 U
mg /Kg
Date Analyzed
03/27/96
03/27/96
v
D
Analyte value determined
from
a 1:125 dilution of the sample
U
Compound was analyzed for
but
not detected.
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 229 of 266
Compound was analyzed for but not detected.
ENCO LABORATORIES
RBP08T #
: DR-3777
DATE REPORTED: March
29, 1996
REFIjRxNCB
95770
PROJRCT WUM
North
Naples Fire Dept.
`
PAGL 9 OF
11
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
ZQML S
MEMOD
S =1
LAS BLANK
Units
.Arsenic
7060
0.465
0.40 U
mq /gq
Date Analyzed
03/26/96
03/26/96
Barium
7080
20.0 U
20.0 U
mg /Kg
ate Analyzed
03/26/96
03/26/96
Cadmium
Date Analyzed
7130
0.8 U
- 03/26/ -96
0.8 U
03/26/96
mg /Rq
ate Analyzed
rrate7190
4.0 U
03/26/96
4.0 U
mg /Rq
03/26/96
Lead
Date Analyzed
7420
4.0 U
03/26/96
4.0 U
03/26/96
mq /Rq
Mercury
jDate Analyzed
7471
0.050 U
03/27/96
0.050 U
mg /Kg
.
03/27/96
Selenium
-Date Analyzed
7740
0.40 U
03/26/96
0.40 U
mq /Rg
03/26/96
Silver
Date Analyzed
7760
2.6 U
03/26/96
1.6 U
03/26/96
mg /Kg
Compound was analyzed for but not detected.
E
i
Parameter
1EPA- Method 602
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
O- %ylene
EPA Method 8010A
1,1- Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Chlorobenzene
EPA Metho 8020A
[Benzene
'Toluene
Chlorobenzene
EPA Methocl 9073
'Total Petr. Hydrocarbons
i
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 230 of 266
SNCO LABORATORIES
REPORT # : OR3777
DATE REPORTED: March 29, 3996
PJKF%RENCE : 95770
PROSRCT NAME : North Naples Fire Dept.
PAGE 10 OF 11
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
% RECOVERY
ACCEPT
% RPD
ACCEPT
MSld¢SD /LCS
LIMITS
MS /MSD
LIjMTS
110 /110 /105
70 -135
<1
23
95/105/105
71 -123
10
20
105 /105 /105
65 -128
<1
24
105 /105/105
63 -131
<1
22
BB/110/122
49-128
22
33
82/104/102
S7 -125
24J
19
82/ 98/ 84
63 -119
18
21
94/ 98/102
70 -134
4
19
8B/ 92/ 94
67 -134
4
19
90/ 96/ 90
62-144
6
27
98/ 91/ 99
69 -124
7
15
Environmental conservation Laboratories Comprehensive QA Plan #960038G
J Value exceeds established limit for precision
< Less Than
MS Matrix Spike
MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate
LCS = Laboratory Control Standard
_ RPD = Relative Percent Difference
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written
approval of the laboratory.
C
I
O
E
ammeter
�otal Metals
Arsenic, 7060
arium, 7080
admium, 7130
Chromium, 7190
read, 7420
ercury, 7471
Selenium, 7740
elver, 7760
Y
s
Ti
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 231 of 266
ENCO LABORATORIES
REPORT # : OR3777
DATE REPORTED: March 29, 1996
REFERENCE 9577D
PROLTECT NAME North Naples Fire Dept.
PAGE 11 OF 11
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
" % RECOVERY
ACCEPT
% RPD
ACCEPT
MS /MSD /LCS
LnaTS
KS
LIMITS
77/ 82/ 74
50 -135
6
25
81/ 85/ 86
75 -115
4
12
93/ 93/ 92
80 -110
<1
10
96/ 94/ 95
BD -115
2
10
91/ 91/ 92
80 -110
<1
10
-107/10-6/1.04
75-125
i
72
100/ 89/ 98
38 -129
12
15
901 90/ 96
80 -115
'Cl
10
Environmental Conservation Laboratories Comprehensive QA Plan #9600380,
< - Less Than
-MS = Matrix Spike
MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate
LCS = Laboratory Control Standard
I;RPD = Relative Percent Difference
10" is report small not be reproduced except in full, Without the written
proval of the laboratory.
m
°C
a
0
LLJ
i
y
■
0
Q
LU
U
r
LL
O
o
0
!--
Z
xmS
N LL
0
°m
J
Z
CLL m
4
815,
Soa
o
N N
Z
� m
V
7
(n N N
J
�m
Z
U
O
Lu
LL
o�
LU
r O
m
L
0
■
Mason
ONES
MENOMONEE
•
OMENL
s�common�����
11
111
•
� •
_'•
.
ny
�1
J
1
B
86111
1
APPENDIX E
USGS QUAD MAP
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 233 of 266
if-pA h
12/7/00
1-0
SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 E4ST
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ill
H
4T9
.7-
q: Ij
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 234 of 266
I
li
Ac
N. D 7
i qft
ME
Got: r
fa
jlh
jgw
it
mw
Ir
.
7
4T9
.7-
q: Ij
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 234 of 266
I
7_ # 1 . (
li
i qft
ME
Got: r
fa
7_ # 1 . (
PARCEL LOCATED AT CORNER OF GOODLETM AND PMT RIDGE
USGS QUAD MAP
ACAD
W. T. S
1 OF 1
00.463
11
A
c
Got: r
fa
jlh
jgw
PARCEL LOCATED AT CORNER OF GOODLETM AND PMT RIDGE
USGS QUAD MAP
ACAD
W. T. S
1 OF 1
00.463
11
A
c
a
i
rk
APPENDIX F
AERUL PHOTOGRAPH
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27. 2010
Page 235 of 266
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 236 of 266
EXHIBIT 11
14
DEPARTMENT OF c
HISTORICAL RESOURCES
LETTER
OCT -15 -2007 12:55
CHARLIE CRIST
Governor
October 13, 2007
Jeremy Stork
Davidvois tLnginstring
2154 7)wde Center Way, Suite #3
Naples, FL 34109
Fax: 239-597-5195
Dear Mr. Stork:
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27. 2010
Page P"6 pf 266
E1JRf S. BROWNING
Secretary of State
In response to your inquiry of October 12, 2007, the Florida Maxtor Site File lists no previously recorded cultural
resources in the following parcel:
T49S, R25E, Section 10
In interpreting the insults of our search, please remember the folloWing points: _ .
■ Arena which have not been completely surveyed, such as yours, may contain unrecorded
archaeological sites, unrecorded historically Important structures, or both-
* As you may know, state and federal laws require formal environmental review for some
projects. Record searches by the staff of the Florida Master Site File do not constitute such a
review of cultural resources. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the
Compliance Review Section of the Bureau of Historie Preservation at 850- 245 -6333 or at this
address.
If you have any further quextions concerning the Florida Master Site File, please contoot us as below.
Sinocroly,
GtAlx 1 Vr
Celeste Ivory
Administrative Assistant I1/Assistant Suporviaor
Florida Master Site File
500 S. Bmnough St.
Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0250
Web: ly(y:�r�FB.COm1DreSereallon
0- trail: m2iyorV -9tat81114
R. A. Gray Building a 500 South Sronough Street - Tal]samm ee. Merida. 32399 -0250
Telephone: (850) 248 -6500 - Facsimile: (850) 245.6125
www.domatate.tt.us
TOTR- P.02
O
wU
GS
zo
0
it ii!k
Ill
4L
ly
wU
GS
zo
0
it ii!k
Ill
4L
AmIN
Ill
DAVIDSON
North Naples United Methodist Church MPUD
General Description
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 239 of 266
The North Naples United Methodist Church MPUD project is a 13 f acre property
located along the east side of Goodlette -Frank Road approximately 1/3 mile north of Pine
Ridge Road. The project is located in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, of
Collier County, Florida. The North Naples United Methodist Church MPUD project is
proposed with community and assisted living type use facilities.
Existing Conditions
The project site is currently undeveloped and does not fall under a current master surface
water system permitted by the South Florida Water Management District.
Stormwater Management System
The surface water management system will be designed to utilize a series of catch basins,
ditch inlets, and stormwater pipes to convey the storm water runoff to a series of retention
and detention areas. The system will consist of several detention and retention areas used
to collect and convey the surface storm water runoff while providing the required pre-
treatment for water quality and 25 year three day stonn event attenuation. The detention
and retention areas are to be interconnected by the catch basins and stormwater pipes
which will acts as equalizer pipes and the conveyance system to the control structure,
which is the ultimate outfall at the Southwest corner of the property. The proposed
stormwater system will have a perimeter benn encompassing the entire project which will
contain the storm water flows for the 25 year three day storm event within the project
basin boundary and prevent sheet flow onto the adjacent properties. The minimum
finished floor elevation will be detennined by the 100 year three day storm event
modeling results or the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map elevation, which ever is
greater. The FEMA flood zone for the project is "XO" and "X" which has no base flood
elevation. The storm water management system will be permitted by South Florida
Water Management District ( SFWMD) per SFWMD and Collier County requirements.
The stonn water management system will be owned, operated and maintained by the
property owner association.
.c:,.. i _ ..... .1 ,_ ,.,,_ Sit. x'f C' ., I �, E,` -;.oni
0
Page 240 of 266
Trobllcock
nuuunllorm
Traffic Impact Statement
North Naples United Methodist Church
South Parcel Rezone
CCDS Application (AR- 13375)
Collier County, FL
8/17/2009
Prepared for:
North Naples United Methodist Church
6000 Goodlette -Frank Road North
Naples, FL 34109
Prepared by:
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA • 6660 Mangrove way, Naples, FL 34109 Ph, 239.566.9551 Fx. 239.566.9553 wwwArebllcock.biz
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 241 of 266
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CCDS AR- 23375) — August 2009
Statement of Certification
I certify that this Traffic Analysis has been prepared by me or under my immediate
supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and
Transportation Engineering.
Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E.
FL Registration No. 47116
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA
6660 Mangrove Way
Naples, FL 34109
Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796
2
i
Agenda I`em No, 17C
July 27. 2010
Page 242 of 266
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CCDS AR- 13375) — August 2009
Table of Contents Page
Project Description 4 -5
Trip Generation 5
Trip Distribution and Assignment 6
Background Traffic 7
Existing and Future Roadway Network g
Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -- Roadway Link Analysis and
Intersection Analysis 9 -10
Turn Lane Analysis 10
Improvement Analysis 10
0 Mitigation of Impact 10
i
Appendix A: Project Site Location Map (1 Sheet)
Appendix B: Project Master Site Plan (1 Sheet)
Appendix C: Project Trip Distribution Maps by Percentage and AM /PM Peak
Hour (2 Sheets)
Appendix D: ITE Land Use Code Descriptions (4 Sheets)
Appendix E: Trip Generation Calculations (3 Sheets)
3
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 243 of 266
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CODS AR- 13375) — August 2009
Project Description
The North Naples United Methodist Church (NNUMC) South Parcel Rezone
project is located and adjoins the south side of the existing NNUMC property
located at 6000 Goodlette -Frank Road in north Naples. The NNUMC property is
located on the east side of Goodlette -Frank Road, approximately % mile north of
the intersection of Goodlette -Frank Road /Pine Ridge Road. The project is a
proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) totalizing approximately 13.0 acres
+ / -. The North Naples United Methodist Church MPUD will be developed as a
mixed use project which may include a mix of limited community facility uses,
included but not limited to a religious facility, religious facility associated uses, a
kindergarten through 12th grade school and assisted living facilities (ALF),
continuing care retirement communities (CCRC) and independent living units for
age 55 plus and senior housing.
The project is located in Section 10, Township 495, Range 25E, Collier County, FL.
Refer to Appendix A for a project site location map and Appendix B for a project
master site plan.
The North Naples United Methodist Church South Parcel Rezone TIS provides a
highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip
generation. The TIS analysis is run based on a land use mix of 209 Assisted Living
Units (occupied beds), 150 students added to the existing NNUMC private school
(K -12) and a day care center for 50 children. This development program is
illustrated below. Refer to Appendix D for the more descriptive ITE Land Use
Code Descriptions of the proposed land uses.
Table 1— Development Program
Use I TE Land Use Code* Total Size I Build-Out Year
Private School (K -12) __ — 536 LL_=U.dents 2014
Table Note: 'Refer to Appendix for applicable Land Use Code Descriptions
4
Agenda Item No. '17C
July 27, 2010
Page 244 of 266
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CCDSAR- 13375) — August 2009
The internal site circulation system proposes an internal connection between the
existing NNUMC Campus and the proposed project. (Appendix B: Project Master
Concept Plan). No new additional external connections to Goodlette -Frank Road
are proposed.
Trip Generation
The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 81h Edition. The software program Trip
Generation by Microtrans (Rev. 11/08) is used to create the raw unadjusted trip
generation for the project. The ITE rates were used for the project trip
generation, because the equations resulted in either zero (0) values, or lower
values. The trip generations in Table 2 are the proposed new trips for the project.
No reductions for internal capture or pass -by trips have been taken. The values in
Table 2 are what will be used for the trip distribution and assignment in the link
analysis. More details of the trip generation calculations can be found in
0 Appendix E.
0
Table 2 —Site Trip Generation (Proposed)— Average Weekday
141
Agenda Item No. 11C
July 27, 2010
Page 245 of 266
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CCDS AR- 13375) — August 2009
Trip Distribution and Assignment
The traffic generated by the development was assigned to the adjacent roadways
using the knowledge of the area and as coordinated with Collier County
Transportation Planning Staff. The site - generated trip distribution is shown in
Table 3 and is graphically depicted in Appendix C (by Percentage and by AM /PM
Peak Hr, Peak Direction).
Table 3— Project Traffic Distribution for Peak Hour, Peak Direction
Note: Peak Hr, Peak Direction is AM Pk Hr Entering (120 vph) and PM Pk Hr Exiting
(66 vph) Volumes, respectively.
N
0
0
2014
2014
Projected
Projected
cc
Distribution
AM Peak
PM Peak
Roadway Link
AUIR
Roadway Link Location
of Project
Hr, Peak
Hr, Peak
Link
Traffic
Direction
Direction
ID #
Project
Project
Traffic
Traffic
Volume I
Volume
65
South of Project Site to Pine
Ridge Road
33%
40
22
,4
19
Vanderbilt Beach Road to
Immokalee Road
27%
32
18
Note: Peak Hr, Peak Direction is AM Pk Hr Entering (120 vph) and PM Pk Hr Exiting
(66 vph) Volumes, respectively.
N
0
0
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CCDS AR- 13375) — August 2W9
0 Background Traffic
0
Agenda 1'em No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 246 of 266
Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the
roadway network in the study area using the Transportation Planning Staff
Guidance of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the rate from annual traffic counts,
whichever is greater. Table 4 illustrates the application of projected growth
rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak
direction traffic volume for the year 2014.
Table 4— Background Traffic without Project (2008 and 2014)
Table Note: Growth Factor = (1 +Annual Growth Rate)A6; 2014 Projected Volume = 2008 AUIR
Volume'Growth Factor, or 2008 AUIR +AUIR Trip Bank, whichever is greater.
7
2014
Projected
2008 AUIR
Peak Hr,
cc
Peak Hr,
Projected
Peak Dir
Roadway
AUIR
Peak Dir
Traffic
Growth
Background
Link
Link
Roadway Link Location
Background
Annual
Factor
Traffic
ID g
Traffic
Growth
Volume
Volume
Rate ( % /yr)
w /out
(trips /Mr)
Project
(trips /hr)
65
South of Project Site to
1,520
2.00%
1.1262
1,712
7
Pine Ridge Road
19
Vanderbilt Beach Road
708
3.04%
1.1968
946
to Immokalee Road
Table Note: Growth Factor = (1 +Annual Growth Rate)A6; 2014 Projected Volume = 2008 AUIR
Volume'Growth Factor, or 2008 AUIR +AUIR Trip Bank, whichever is greater.
7
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 247 of 266
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CCDS AR- 13375) — August 2009
Existing and Future Roadway Network
The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2008 Annual Update and
Inventory Report (AUIR) and the 2014 roadway conditions are based on the
current Collier County 5 Year Work Program. The roadways evaluated are
anticipated to remain the same thru 2014. The existing and future roadway
conditions are illustrated in Table 5.
Table 5— Existing and Future Roadway Conditions
Table Notes: 21.1 = 2 -lane undivided roadway; 41), 6D =4 -lane, 6 -lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS
= Level of Service. Link 65 is 4D & 6D, and the section south of project is 61), so 6D capacity from Link 88
is used (adjacent link that is also 6D).
a
is
9
[J
Exist Min
Future
LOS Sid
,.
Roadway
µ r 1
wxny Y
b F f Y
!
t
"�'v1 i �.dr �5 l
�,
%
l
4 �
:ql
t
"`�'bi 4 v••��.
rm.,� r•`J le�� s��i
�`
f
°
`
P4
Table Notes: 21.1 = 2 -lane undivided roadway; 41), 6D =4 -lane, 6 -lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS
= Level of Service. Link 65 is 4D & 6D, and the section south of project is 61), so 6D capacity from Link 88
is used (adjacent link that is also 6D).
a
is
9
[J
0
`J
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CCDS AR- 23375) — August 2009 Page 2 =8 of 2 ,5s
Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -- Roadway Link Analysis
and Intersection Analysis
The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service
(LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project were evaluated to
determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future (2014).
The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined
that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both
the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link adjacent
to the project (Goodlette -Frank Road); 3% for other links and if the roadway is
projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria,
this project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area
roadway network. Conservatively, the project AM peak entering volumes are
added to the network volumes to give a worst case scenario. Table 6 illustrates
the LOS impacts of the project on the roadway network closest to the project.
None of the links of Goodlette -Frank Road are projected to be operating below
the adopted level of service with, or without the project.
Table 6— Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) —With and Without the Project in
the Year 2014
Il
r
Min LOS
r
Peak Dir,
exceeded
Peak Hr
without
Volurne
Project?
r
87
P e�39+xt
�h`*n,�.�'^
i
^•t M��;
k.f•<^_ "�, %y 4 F:
v,�I
.i.
4 •l-S c!
x lie
7 T
1 ts- 1
to Pine Ridge • 1
Vanderbilt Beach
Road to Immokalee
•r
R1.•
Il
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CCDS AR- 13375) — August 2009 Page 249 of 266
The following intersections with Goodlette -Frank Road were evaluated in
previous study and found to be satisfactory with, or without the project in 2014:
Vanderbilt Beach Road, Orange Blossom Drive, NNUMC Shared Entrance, and Pine
Ridge Road.
Turn Lane Analysis
The project will share the existing main access of the NNUMC on Goodlette -Frank
Road. This is a full median opening on Goodlette -Frank Road with existing
Northbound Right and Southbound Left Turn Lanes. Goodlette -Frank Road is an
urban section and has a posted speed of 45 mph. Based on FDOT Index 301, the
minimum turn lane length is 185 ft (which includes a 50 ft taper) plus required
queue. The existing turn lanes were constructed as part of the recent widening of
Goodlette -Frank Road and were built in accordance with the FDOT criteria. They
should be adequate to serve the existing and proposed project conditions. A
detailed evaluation will be performed at the time of site development permitting
and applicable length adjustments will be made to accommodate the queue
requirements, if they are warranted.
Improvement Analysis
The project impacts to the Collier County roadway network are not significant and
are not adverse. Based on the link analysis and trip distribution, the proposed
project is not a significant and adverse traffic generator to this location. Based on
this analysis, no additional site or offsite improvements are necessitated.
Mitigation of Impact
The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as
building permits are issued for the project.
10
E
0
a
Agenda Item No. 17C
Jily 27, 2010
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CCQS AR- 13375) — August 2009 Page 250 of 266
Appendix A: Project Site location Map
1 Sheet),
11
Agenda Item No. 17C
ftml� AM 3530K AFTRO D,SUI E301 NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST .
3530 KRAFT ROAD, SURE 301
petY1p50NNAPLES,F134t05 CHURCH MPUD REZONE
,., �. , ,, .. PHONE: 238.4348060
LOCATION MAP
July 27, 2010
LEGEND
aawc srrE
— whoa ROAMMY3
— CDA ffR COLINTY MAWMMD R01M
O
Of
Y
j2
0
O
C7
/)
0
N
_JQQ
2
H
S_
Q_
d
PINE RIDGE ROAD
1�
f
/
J
o
a
O
z
Y
2
N
w
r
o
W E
S
s
SOURCES: COLLIER COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
SYSTEMS (2008)
0 0p 2,000
FLORIDA GEOGRAPHIC DATA LIBRARY (2008)
FEET
ftml� AM 3530K AFTRO D,SUI E301 NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST .
3530 KRAFT ROAD, SURE 301
petY1p50NNAPLES,F134t05 CHURCH MPUD REZONE
,., �. , ,, .. PHONE: 238.4348060
LOCATION MAP
0
s
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 20'i0
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CCDS AR- 13375) — August 2009 Page 252 of 266
Appendix B: Project Master Site Plan
1 Sheet
13
r
N
�Rf=
Ky
yyvWi
3�
CAP
g $
G I + tH3W* )'WNCLLnlusN1:3sn awi
N
�lp
T
and avow
311310000 3wov m :Mmm
flu.
1
W
U
W rn
w
EL
Y�
1m7ARoYNVw w31VM ow
T#ovgMB900 amomm asn oN
OndsNOYM00300R Wd ;ONMOZ
f"
H
r:
I .•
�I
`I
1
'I
it
I
aw
i;
I DO
Y
:Y
F 6e
T
8a$
Mgx
i
w °f#e
Z.
<a
Z
2
H
z
0
10
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CODS AR- 13375) — August 2009 Page 254 of 266
Appendix C: Project Trip Distribution Maps
Percentage and AM /PM Peak Hour
2 Sheets
15
Agerua Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 255 of 266
Appendix C: Project Trip Distribution Map
L PE-�c-;F- �-)7A.(.,, F-)
A: 6000 doodlette Rd N, Nepks, FL 34108 -7206
L)rEe.g)Li
$EAGN
RotD
�C
X
+� `�Nortbi
L.sU�ND
•�� % o P>?oTECr Tc*rAL- Es�t'Es' -116
AOb EXITING 1 P—Af-Fl G
Page 1 oft
a
0
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 256 of 266
Appendix C: Project Trip Distribution Map
A M Ain P r-A P��K H R)
A: 6000 Goodlette Rd N, Naples, FL 34109 -7206
1_E6 _Qb (DF VEH. /�1Z ACVSJTa 1 TUJaL
M= LANK. AM kF Fk)- fP)NG vat -OAF
Page %02 FN= L1N K Pry PK N� x1TtN( VoL,�r'1F,
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CCDSAR- 1337S) — August 2W9 Page 257 of 266
Appendix D: ITE Land Use Code
Descriptions l4 Sheets)
18
Land Use: 254
Assisted Living
Description
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 258 of 266
Assisted living complexes are residential settings that provide either routine general protective
oversight or assistance with activities necessary for independent living to mentally or physically
limited persons. They commonly have separate living quarters for residents and services include
dining, housekeeping, social and physical activities, medication administration and transportation.
Alzheimer's and ALS care are commonly offered by these facilities, though the living quarters for
these patients may be located separately from the other residents. Assisted care commonly
bridges the gap between independent living and nursing homes. In some areas of the country,
assisted living residences may be called personal care, residential care, or domiciliary care. Staff
may be available at an assisted care facility 24 hours a day, but skilled medical care —which is
limited in nature —is not required. Continuing care retirement community (Land Use 255) and
nursing home (Land Use 620) are related uses.
Additional Data
The rooms in these facilities may be private or shared accommodations, consisting of either a
single room or a small apartment -style unit with a kitchenette and living space.
One study reported that according to national and local data, less than 5 percent of the residents
owned cars, which were rarely driven. Employees, visitors and delivery trucks make most of the
trips to these facilities.
Truck traffic was captured for some studies in this land use and is presented in the table below.
Although truck traffic was very low overall, the most trips occurred during the mid -day period on a
weekday.
The peak hour of the generator typically did not coincide with the peak hour of the adjacent street
traffic, primarily because of the shifts of the employees. For the data collected in this land use,
shifts typically began at 7:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. The a.m. peak hour of the generator
typically occurred from 6:00 a.m.- 7:00 a.m , while the p.m peak hour of the generator typically
occurred from 3:00 p.m.- 4:00 p.m.
Time Period _
%Trucks
Weekday Moming
1
6:30 a.m. -9:30 a.m.
Weekday Mid -Day
9
11:00 a.m.-I.30 .m.
Weekday Evening
2
2:45 .m. -6:45 .m.
Saturday Mid -Day
4
11:D0 a.m. -2:00 P .m.
Saturday Evening
0
3:00 .m. -8:00 .m.
Sunday Mid -Day
1
(11:00 a.m. -2:00 .m.
Sunday Evening
0
3:00 .m. -6:00 .m.
Trip Generation, 7th Edition 477 Institute of Transportation Engineers
_ _-------
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2016
Page 259 of 266
The sites were surveyed in the late 1980s, the late 1990s and 2000s in Connecticut, New Jersey,
New York and Pennsylvania.
Source Numbers
91, 244, 573, 581
Trip Generation, 7th Edition 478 Institute of Transportation
Land Use: 536
Private School (K -12)
Description
Agenda Item No. 17G
July 27, 2010
Page 260 of 266
Private schools in this land use primarily serve students atterxling kindergarten through the 12th
grade, but may also include those beginning with pr" classes. These schools may also otter
extended care and day care. Students may travel a long distance to get to private schools.
Elementary school (Land Use 520), middle schooUunior high school (Land Use 522), high school
(Land Use 530) and private school —K -8 (Land Use 534) are related uses.
Additional Data
Some of the schools included in this land use provided bus service. One study reported that
carpooling was used instead of bus service.
Peak hours of the generator --
The weekday a-m peak hour of the generator typically Coincided with the peak hour of
the adjacent street traffic; therefore, only one a.m. peak hour, which represents both the
peak hour of the generator and the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. is displayed.
The weekday p.m. peak hour varied between 2:30 p.m. and 4:00 p.m.
The sties were surveyed from the 1980s to the 2000s in Delaware, Florida, MaryAnd, Oregon
and Washington.
Source Numbers
283, 355, 370, 536. 571
Trip Generation, 71h Edition 950 Institute of Transportation Engineers
Agenda Item No. 17C
0
Land Use: 565
Day Care Center
Description
A day care center is a tree-standing facility where care for pre - school aped children is provided.
normally during the daytime hours. Day care fadiidea generally Include classrooms, offices.
eating areas and playgrounds. Some centers also provide after- school care for children.
Additional Data
Peak hours of the generator—
The weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the generator typically coincided with the peak
hours of the adjacent street traffic.
The sites were surveyed from the mid•19803 to the 2000s throughout the United States,
Source Numbers
159, 208.216, 253, 335, 336, 337, 355.418, 423, 536, 550, 562, 583
0
0
Tifp Generation, 71h Edition 1025 Institute of Transportation Engineers
�J
i
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 262 of 266
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone (CCDS AR- 13375) — August 2009
Appendix E: Trip Generation Calculations
3 Sheets
23
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 263 of 266
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone
Summary of Trip Generation Calculation
For 209 Occupied Beds of Assisted Living
August 15, 2009
Avg. Weekday 2 -Way Volume
7 -9 AM Peak. Hour Enter
7 -9 AM Peak Hour Exit
7 -9 AM Peak Hour Total
4 -6 PM Peak Hour Enter
4 -6 PM Peak Hour Exit
4 -6 PM Peak Hour Total
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Total
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit
PM Pk fir, Generator, Total
Saturday 2 -Way Volume
Saturday Peak Hour Enter
Saturday Peak Hour Exit
Saturday Peak Hour Total
Sunday 2 -Way Volume
Sunday Peak Hour Enter
Sunday Peak Hour Exit
Sunday Peak Hour Total
Average
Standard
Adjustment
Driveway
Rate
Deviation
Factor
Volume
2.74
1.75
1.00
573
0.12
0.00
1.00
25
0.05
0.00
1.00
10
0.17
0.00
1.00
36
0.15
0.00
1.00
31
0.14
0.00
1.00
29
0.29
0.00
1.00
61
0.19
0.00
1.00
40
0.06
0.00
1.00
13
0.25
0.00
1.00
52
0.1.4
C.00
1.00
29
0.24
0.00
1.00
50
0.38
0.61
1.00
79
2.20
1.57
1..00
460
0.18
0.00
1.00
38
0.16
0.00
1.00
38
0.36
0.60
1.00
75
2.44
1.65
1.00
510
0.19
0.00
1.00
40
0.23
0.00
1.00
48
0.42
0.65
1.00
Be
Note: A zero indicates no data available.
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
0
0
0
NNUMC South Parcel Rezone
Summary of Trip Generation Calculation
For 150 Students of Private School (K -12)
August 15, 2009
Note: A zero indicates no data availatle.
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2007.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 264 of 266
Average
Standard
Adjustment
Driveway
Rate
Deviation
Factor
Volume
Avg. Weekday 2 -Way Volume
2.48
0.00
1.00
372
7 -9 AM Peak Hour Enter
0.49
0.00
1.00
74
7 -9 AM Peak Hour Exit
0.32
0.(D0
1.00
48
7 -9 AM Peak Hour Total
0.81
0.91
1.00
122
4 -6 PM Peak Hour Enter
0.01
0.00
1.00
it
4 -6 PM Peak Hour Exit
0.10
0.00
1.00
15
4 -6 PM Peak Hour Total
0.17
0.41
1.00
26
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter
0.49
0.00
1.00
74
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit
0.32
0.00
1.00
48
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Total
0.81
0.91
1.00
122
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter
0.24
0.00
1.00
36
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit
0.34
0.00
1.D0
51
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Total
0.58
0.77
1.1)0
87
Saturday 2 -Way Volume
0.00
0.00
1.00
0
Saturday Peak Hour Enter
0.00
0.00
1.00
0
Saturday Peak Hour Exit
0.00
0.00
1.00
0
Saturday Peak Hour Total
0.00
0.00
1.00
0
Sunday 2 -Way Volume
0.00
0.00
1.00
0
Sunday Peak Hour Enter
0.)0
0.00
1.00
0
Sunday Peak Hour Exit
0.00
0.01t
1.00
0
Sunday Peak Hour Total
0.00
0.00
1.D0
0
Note: A zero indicates no data availatle.
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2007.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 264 of 266
..........................
Agenda Item No. 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 265 of 266
NNOMC South Parcel Rezone
Summary of Trip Generation
Calculation
For 50 Students of Day Care
Center
August 15, 2009
Average
Standard
Adjustment
Driveway
Rate
Deviation
Factor
Volume
Avg. Weekday 2 -Way Volume
4.48
2.37
1.00
224
7 -9 AM Peak Hour Enter
0.42
0.00
1.00
21
7 -9 AM Peak Hour Exit
0.38
0.00
1.00
19
7 -9 AM Peak Hour Total
0.80
0.92
1.00
40
4 -6 PM Peak Hour Enter
0.39
0.00
1.00
20
4 -6 PM Peak Hour Exit
0.43
0.00
1.00
22
4 -6 PM Peak Hour Total
0.82
0.95
1.00
41
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter
0.43
0.00
1.00
22
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit
0.39
0.00
1.00
20
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Total
0.82
0.94
1.00
41
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter
0.40
0.00
1.00
20
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit
0.45
0.00
1.00
23
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Total
0.85
0.96
1.00
43
Saturday 2 -Way Volume
0.39
0.70
1.00
20
Saturday Peak Hour Enter
0.07
0.00
1.00
4
Saturday Peak Hour Exit
0.04
0.00
1.00
2
Saturday Peak Hour Total
0.11
0.34
1.00
6
Sunday 2 -way Volume
0.37
0.65
1.00
19
Sunday Peak Hour Enter
0.06
0.00
1.00
3
Sunday Peak Hour Exit
0.05
0.00
1.00
3
Sunday Peak Hour Total
0.11
0.33
1.00
6
Note: A zero indicates no
data available.
Source: Institute of Transportation
Engineers
Trip Generation, 8th
Edition, 2008.
TRIP GENERATION
BY MICROTRANS
Agenda Item No, 17C
July 27, 2010
Page 266 of 266
20D a Sunday, July 11, 2010 a Naples Daily News
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE
Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, July 27, 2010, in the Boardroom, 3rd
Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Ta-
miami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the
enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The
title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUN-
TY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004 -41, AS AMENDED, THE COLT
LIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH ESTABLISHED THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS
MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DE-
SCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED
USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT
TO BE KNOWN AS THE NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT MPUD, TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A 1,900 SEAT CHURCH
AND CHURCH RELATED FACILITIES, A MAXIMUM 1,900 SEAT CIVIC AND CULTURAL
FACILITIES, A MAXIMUM 200 STUDENT SCHOOL AND A MAXIMUM 209 UNIT
ADULT ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 13.0 + /- ACRES; AND BY PROVID-
ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Petition: PUDZ- 2008 -AR- 13375, The North Naples United Methodist Church Inc.,
represented by Tim Hancock of Davidson Engineering, Inc. and Richard D. Yovano-
vich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., is requesting rezoning
from the Rural Agricultural zoning district (A) to the Mixed Use Planned Unit De-
velopment (MPUD) zoning district to allow development of a maximum 1,900 seat
Church and Church Related Facilities, a maximum 1,900 seat Civic. and Cultural Fa-
cilities, a maximum 200 student School and a maximum 209 unit Adult Assisted Liv-
ing Facility to be known as The North Naples United Methodist Church Mixed Use
Planned Unit Development (MPUD). The subject property, consisting of 13.0 acres,
is located on the east side of Goodlette -Frank Road (CR -851) approximately +/- 1500
feet north of Pine Ridge Road in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East,
Collier County, Florida.
Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are
available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard.
NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the
County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed.
Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of an in-
dividual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recog-
nized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted
10 minutes to speak on an item.
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda
packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective
public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the
Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days
prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board
will become a permanent part of the record,
Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the
proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim
record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evi-
dence upon which the appeal is based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to par-
ticipate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of
certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Depart-
ment, located at 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building W, Naples, Florida 34112,
(239)2528380; Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in
the County Commissioners' Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED COYLE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
July 11 2011) No18599g4