Agenda 04/13/2010 Item # 7A
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 1 of 191
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CU-2008-AR-14085, FLO TV, Inc., represented by Kimberly J. Madison, Esq., of Ruden,
McClosky, Smith, Schuster and Russell, P.A., is requesting a Conditional Use for a
communications tower and the installation of related shelter and equipment in the Estates
(E) Zoning District, as specified in Section 5.05.09 of the Collier County Land Development
Code (LDC). Tbe approximately 4.77-acre subject property is located at 5860 Crews Road,
in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida (Companion
item to V A-PL2009-037).
OBJECTIVE:
To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCe) consider an application for Conditional Use
Number 3 in the Estates (E) Zoning District for a communications tower and related mechanical
equipment shelter, as specified in Section 5.05.09 of the Collier County Land Development Code
(LDC); and to insure that the community's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERATIONS:
On May 25, 1993, a Conditional Use was approved for the subject property (Resolution No. 93-
219, see Appendix I to the staffreport) to allow the replacement of an existing 438-foot guyed
communications tower and its associated mechanical equipment structures with a 430-foot guyed
communications tower and a 2,400 square-foot building. Six years later, due to a federally
mandated frequency and power change that could not be accommodated on the site's existing
tower and antenna, the approved site development plan (SDP) was amended to allow the
replacemenl of the communications tower with a much stronger 394-foot tower. However,
instead of removing the old tower and erecting the newly approved one per the approved SDP,
the applicants simply erected the new tower approximately 50 feet away from the old tower,
thereby expanding the use on the site. Not only was this additional tower in violation of the
approved SDP, it also contravened Resolution No. 93-219, which permitted only one
communications tower, and further stipulated that any "expansion of the uses... or major
changes to the site plan submitted... require the submittal of a new conditional use
application..." It was not until the applicants attempted to co-locate an antenna on the
supposedly dismantled tower that the County became aware of this violation. In order to redress
the infraction and comply with the terms of the approved resolution, the applicant has submitted
the subject Conditional Use application, which if approved, would legitimize the existence of the
additional communications towers on the site and allow the co-location of the new antennae.
As shown on the Conceptual Site Plan contained within the Collier County Planning
Commission Staff Report entitled, "Overall Site Plan," prepared by Black and Veatch, and dated
September 28, 2007, as revised through April 9, 2009, the unmanned facility is somewhat
centrally located on the site, allowing the E Zoning District's required 75-foot front and rear yard
setbacks and 30-foot side yard setbacks to be well exceeded. The two communications towers
and accessory equipment shelters are shown enclosed within a chain-link fence. The towers are
spaced 50 feet apart and linked by elevated walkways labeled as "coax bridges." The walkways
connect the towers to a newly proposed 224 square-foot cquipment shelter, which would house a
CU-2008.AR-14085, FLO TV
January 22, 2010
Page 10f4
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 2 of 191
generator and transformer, and would be mounted by two new dish antennae and a GPS antenna.
Two existing parking spaces for the facility are also shown within the facility's gates. The
facility is accessible via a private drive from Crews Road. A dead-end, dirt spur road at the
entrance provides access for maintenance vehicles to the tower-supporting guy lines and anchors
adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site (these guy lines and anchors, as well as others on the
western boundary of the property, are the subject of the companion Variance application). Along
the northern boundary of the site, a 20,786 square-foot conservation easement is proposed.
Because the site is heavily wooded, as shown in the aerial photograph on the preceding page, the
existing vegetation would serve to satisfy the project's perimeter buffer requirements; and
because of the limited nature of the proposed change, 79.3 percent of the site would remain as
open space.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of the Conditional Use, in and of itself, would have no fiscal impact on Collier County.
There is no guarantee that the project, at build out, would maximize its authorized level of
development, however, if the use were approved, a portion of the existing land would be
developed and the new development would result in an impact on Collier County public
facilities.
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as
needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to
meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development
order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation
Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County
Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include
building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad
valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please
note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the
Planning Commission to analY-Le this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban-Mixed Use
District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the GMP.
Relevant to this petition, the designation permits non-residential uses, including utility and
communication facilities.
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with and complementary to the
surrounding land uses as set forth in the LDC. It is the responsibility of the Zoning and Land
Development Review staff as part of thcir review of tile petition in its entirety to perform this
compatibility analysis.
CU-2008-AR-14085. FI.O TV
January 22, 1010
Page2of4
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 3 of 191
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes that the proposed Conditional Use may be
deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. (Please note that the complete GMP
analysis is contained in the staff report.)
AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT:
The applicant has not made any provision for the affordable or workforce housing needs that
approval of this application might generate.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
All environmental issues have been addressed. The applic,mt was not required to submit an
Environment Impact Statement (EIS) for this project.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
Pursuant to LDC Section 8.06.03 0.1 Powers and Duties, the EAC did not review this petition
because the site is less than ten acres and is not in a Special Treatment (ST) area or an Area of
Critical State Concern (ACSC).
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION:
This item was continued from the October 15, 2009, CCPC hearing, pending further information
as discussed in the attached Supplemental Staff Report. The CCPC heard this petition again on
January 7,2010, and believing that approving the Conditional Use would not be injurious to the
neighborhood or detrimental to the public welfare, voted 6-2 to forward this petition to the BCC
with a recommendation of approval, subject to the following conditions:
1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Conceptual Site Plan, identified
as "Overall Site Plan," prepared by Black and Veatch, and dated September 28, 2007, as
revised through April 9, 2009. The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for Conditional
Use approval only. The final design must be compliance with all applicable federal, state,
and county laws and regulations.
2. Development on the site shall be restricted to 3,359 square feet of impervious area.
3. Maximum height of the two towers on the site shall be limited to 455 feet, including
antennae, lightening rods and other appUl1enances.
4. Both towers on the site shall be equipped with either solid red beacon or dual mode lights
unless a waiver of this requirement is granted by the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA).
5. All guy line anchors shall be fenced pursuant to LDC 5.05.09.G.12.
6. One tower on the site shall be owned by or leased (0 a governmental entity for
government-related, essential service purposes. Should this entity remove its antenna(e)
CU-2008-AR-14085, FLO TV
.lant/my 22,2010
Page 3 of4
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 4 of 191
from the tower, the property owner shall immediately notify the County and replace the
antenna(e) with another essential service user within six months.
Two commissioners did not support the petition because the applicant failed to meet the
conditions of approval from the first Conditional Use. They expressed that the applicant could
not be trusted with the conditions of the second Conditional Use.
Staff has received one letter of objection from the community, which is attached to the Staff
Report as Appendix 2.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Before you is a recommendation by the Planning Commission for approval of a conditional use
authorizing communication towers in the Estates (E) zoning district. A conditional use is a use
that is permitted in a particular zoning district subject to certain restrictions. Decisions regarding
conditional uses are quasi-judicial. As such this item requires ex parte disclosure, and all
testimony given must be under oath. The attached report and recommendations of the Planning
Commission required are advisory only and are not binding on you. Petitioner has the burden of
demonstrating that the necessary requirements have been met, and you may question Petitioner,
or staff, to satisfy yourself that the necessary criteria has been satisfied. In addition to meeting
the necessary criteria, you may place such conditions and safeguards as you deem appropriate to
allow the use, provided that there is competent, substantial evidence that these additional
conditions and safeguards are necessary to promote the public health, safety, welfare, morals,
order, comfort, convenience, appearance, or the general welfare of the neighborhood. As a
further condition of approval of the conditional use, you may require that suitable areas for
streets, public rights-of-way, schools, parks, and other public facilities be set aside, improved,
and/or dedicated for public use, subject to appropriate impact fee credits. Approval or denial of
the petition is by Resolution, with approval of the conditional use requiring four affirmative
votes of the Board (supermajority vote). The proposed Resolution was prepared by the County
Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient for Board action. (STW)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the BCC approve CU-2008-AR-I4085, subject to the conditions of
approval recommended by staff and the CCPC, which have been incorporated into the attached
Resolution.
PREPARED BY:
Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner
Department of Engineering, Environmental, Comprehensive Planning and Zoning Services
CU.20GB.AII.14GB5, FLO TV
January 22, 20/0
Page 4 Q/4
Item Number:
Item Summary:
Meeting Date:
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 5 of 191
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
7A
This item requires that all participants be swam in and ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. CU-2008-AR-14085 Renda Broadcasting Corporation, represented
by Richard D. Yovanovich. Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, PA, is requesting
a Conditional Use for a communications tower and the installation of related shelter and
equipment in the Estates (E) Zoning District, as specified in Section 5.05.09 of the Collier
County Land Development Code (LDC). The approximately 4.77-acre subject property is
located at 5860 Crews Road, in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in Collier
County. Florida. (CTS)
4/13/2010 9:00:00 AM
Planner, Principal
Date
Prepared By
Nancy Gundlach
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Zoning & Land Development Review
3/16/201010:29:47 AM
Approved By
Date
Ray Bellows
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Manager. Planning
Zoning & Land Development Review
3/16/2010 2:45 PM
Approved By
Date
Steven Williams
County Attorney
Assistant County Attorney
County Attorney
3/16/20103:34 PM
Date
Approved By
William D. Lorenz, Jr., P.E.
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Director. COES Engineering Services
El'!gineering & Environmental Services
3/17/20109:42 AM
Date
Approved By
Judy Puig
Community Development &
Environmental Services
Operations Analyst
Community Development &
Environmental Services
3118120105:02 PM
Nick Casalanguida
Date
Approved By
Transportation Division
Director - Transportation Planning
Transportation Planning
3/31/20108:24 AM
Approved By
Heidi F. Ashton
County Attorney
Section Chief/Land Use- Transportation
Date
County Attorney
3/31/201010:55 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
County Manager's Office
Date
Office of Management & Budget
4/1/20109:03 AM
Agenda Ilem No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 6 of 191
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attorney
Date
Leo E. Ochs, Jr.
Approved By
County Managers Office
4/1/20103:22 PM
County Manager
Date
County Managers Office
4/4/2010 2: 19 PM
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 7 of 191
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CU-2008-AR-14085, Renda Broadcasting Corporation represented by Richard D.
Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., is requesting a
Conditional Use for a communications tower and the installation of related shelter and
equipment in the Estates (E) Zoning District, as specified in Section 5.05.09 of the Collier
County Land Development Code (LDC). The approximately 4.77-acre subject property is
located at 5860 Crews Road, in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in Collier
County, Florida.
OBJECTIVE:
To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) consider an application for Conditional Use
Number 3 in the Estates (E) Zoning District for a communications tower and related mechanical
equipment shelter, as specified in Section 5.05.09 of the Collier County Land Development Code
(LDC); and to insure that the community's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The BCC considered this petition at its regular meeting on February 23, 2010. The petition
received a vote of 3-2 which resulted in denial of this Conditional Use. (Please note: a 4-1
supermajority vote is needed for approval of a Conditional Use). Per the Code of Laws and
Ordinances of Collier County, the petitioner requested that the BCC reconsider this petition at its
March 9,2010 meeting. The BCC voted 4-1, upon a motion made by a Commissioner casting a
previous "No" vote, to reconsider this petition.
On May 25, 1993, a Conditional Use was approved for the subject property (Resolution No. 93-
219, see Appendix I to the staff report) to allow the replacement of an existing 438-foot guyed
communications tower and its associated mechanical equipment structures with a 430-foot guyed
communications tower and a 2,400 square-foot building. Six years later, due to a federally
mandated frequency and power change that could not be accommodated on the site's existing
tower and antenna, the approved site development plan (SDP) was amended to allow the
replacement of the communications tower with a much stronger 394-foot tower. However,
instead of removing the old tower and erecting the newly approved one per the approved SDP,
the applicants simply erected the new tower approximately 50 feet away from the old tower,
thereby expanding the use on the site. Not only was this additional tower in violation of the
approved SDP, it also contravened Resolution No. 93-219, which permitted only one
communications tower, and further stipulated that any "expansion of the uses... or major
changes to the site plan submitted... require the submittal of a new conditional use
application..." It was not until the applicants attempted to co-locate an antenna on the
supposedly dismantled tower that the County became aware of this violation. In order to redress
the infraction and comply with the terms of the approved resolution, the applicant has submitted
the subject Conditional Use application, which if approved, would legitimize the existence of the
additional communications towers on the site and allow the co-location of the new antennae.
As shown on the Conceptual Site Plan contained within the Collier County Planning
Commission Staff Report entitled, "Overall Site Plan," prepared by Black and Veatch, and dated
CU-2008-AR-14085. FLO TV
March 16, 2010
Page / of4
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 8 of 191
September 28, 2007, as revised through April 9, 2009, the unmanned facility is somewhat
centrally located on the site, allowing the E Zoning District's required 75-foot front and rear yard
setbacks and 30-foot side yard setbacks to be well exceeded. The two communications towers
and accessory equipment shelters are shown enclosed within a chain-link fence. The towers are
spaced 50 feet apart and linked by elevated walkways labeled as "coax bridges." The walkways
connect the towers to a newly proposed 224 square-foot equipment shelter, which would house a
generator and transformer, and would be mounted by two new dish antennae and a GPS antenna.
Two existing parking spaces for the facility are also shown within the facility's gates. The
facility is accessible via a private drive from Crews Road. A dead-end, dirt spur road at the
entrance provides access for maintenance vehicles to the tower-supporting guy lines and anchors
adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site (these guy lines and anchors, as well as others on the
western boundary of the property, are the subject of the companion Variance application). Along
the northern boundary of the site, a 20,786 square-foot conservation easement is proposed.
Because the site is heavily wooded, as shown in the aerial photograph on the preceding page, the
existing vegetation would serve to satisfy the project's perimeter buffer requirements; and
because of the limited nature of the proposed change, 79.3 percent of the site would remain as
open space.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of the Conditional Use, in and of itself, would have no fiscal impact on Collier County.
There is no guarantee that the project, at build out, would maximize its authorized level of
development, however, if the use were approved, a portion of the existing land would be
developed and the new development would result in an impact on Collier County public
facilities.
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as
needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to
meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development
order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation
Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County
Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include
building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad
valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please
note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the
Planning Commission to analyze this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban-Mixed Use
District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the GMP.
Relevant to this petition, the designation permits non-residential uses, including utility and
communication facilities.
CU-200S-AR-/40S5. no TV
March 16. 2010
Page 2 0/4
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 9 of 191
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with and complementary to the
surrounding land uses as set forth in the LDC. It is the responsibility of the Zoning and Land
Development Review staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety to perform this
compatibility analysis.
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes that the proposed Conditional Use may be
deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. (Please note that the complete GMP
analysis is contained in the staff report.)
AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT:
The applicant has not made any provision for the affordable or workforce housing needs that
approval of this application might generate.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES:
All environmental issues have been addressed. The applicant was not required to submit an
Environment Impact Statement (EIS) for this project.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
Pursuant to LDC Section 8.06.03 0.1 Powers and Duties. the EAC did not review this petition
because the site is less than ten acres and is not in a Special Treatment (ST) area or an Area of
Critical State Concern (ACSC).
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPCl RECOMMENDATION:
This item was continued from the October 15,2009, CCPC hearing, pending further information
as discussed in the attached Supplemental Staff Report. The cepc heard this petition again on
January 7,2010, and believing that approving the Conditional Use would not be injurious to the
neighborhood or detrimental to the public welfare, voted 6-2 to forward this petition to the BCC
with a recommendation of approval, subject to the following conditions:
I. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Conceptual Site Plan, identified
as "Overall Site Plan," prepared by Black and Veatch, and dated September 28,2007, as
revised through April 9, 2009. The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for Conditional
Use approval only. 'The final design must be in compliance with all applicable federal,
state, and county laws and regulations.
2. Development on the site shall be restricted to 3,359 square feet of impervious area.
3. Maximum height of the two towers on the site shall be limited to 455 feet, including
antennae, lightening rods and other appurtenances.
4. Both towers on the site shall be equipped with either solid red beacon or dual mode lights
unless a waiver of this requirement is granted by the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA).
CU.2008-AR-14085, FLO TV
March 16. 2010
Page3 of 4
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 10 of 191
5. All guy line anchors shall be fenced pursuant to LDC 5.05.09.G.12.
6. One tower on the site shall be owned by or leased to a governmental entity for
government-related, essential service purposes. Should this entity remove its antenna(e)
from the tower, the property owner shall immediately notify the County and replace the
antenna(e) with another essential service user within six months.
Two commissioners did not support the petition because the applicant failed to meet the
conditions of approval from the first Conditional Use. They expressed that the applicant could
not be trusted with the conditions ofthe second Conditional Use.
Staff has received one letter of objection from the community, which is attached to the Staff
Report as Appendix 2.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Before you is a recommendation by the Planning Commission for approval of a conditional use
authorizing communication towers in the Estates (E) zoning district. A conditional use is a use
that is permitted in a particular zoning district subject to certain restrictions. Decisions regarding
conditional uses are quasi-judicial. As such this item requires ex parte disclosure, and all
testimony given must be under oath. The attached report and recommendations of the Planning
Commission required are advisory only and are not binding on you. Petitioner has the burden of
demonstrating that the necessary requirements have bcen met, and you may question Petitioner,
or staff, to satisfy yourself that the necessary criteria has been satisfied. In addition to meeting
the necessary criteria, you may place such conditions and safeguards as you deem appropriate to
allow the use, provided that there is competent, substantial evidence that these additional
conditions and safeguards are necessary to promote the public health, safety, welfare, morals,
order, comfort, convenience, appearance, or the general welfare of the neighborhood. As a
further condition of approval of the conditional use, you may require that suitable areas for
streets, public rights-of-way, schools, parks, and othcr public facilities be set aside, improved,
and/or dedicated for public use, subject to appropriate impact fee credits. Approval or denial of
the petition is by Resolution, with approval of thc conditional use requiring four affirmative
votes of the Board (supermajority vote). The proposed Resolution was prepared by the County
Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient for Board action. (STW)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the BCC approve CU-2008-AR-14085, subject to the conditions of
approval recommended by staff and the CCPC, which have been incorporated into the attached
Resolution.
PREPARED BY:
Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner
Department of Engineering, Environmental, Comprehensive Planning and Zoning Services
CU-2008-AR-/4085. FLO TV
March 16,2010
Page4of4
AGE~~~~~~O~~
Page110f191
Co~ 90unty
- -- -
SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT
TO:
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HEARING: JANUARY 7, 2010
SUBJECT: PETITION CU-2008-AR-I4085, FLO TV INCORPORATED (COMPANION
ITEM V A-PL-2009-037)
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Owner:
FLO TV, Inc.
5775 Morehouse Drive
San Diego, CA 92121
Agent:
James J. Porter, Esq./Kimberly J. Madison, Esq.
Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster and Russell, P.A
401 East Jackson Street, Ste. 2700
Tampa, FL 33602
REOUESTED ACTION:
To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application for
Conditional Use Number 3 of the Estates (E) Zoning District, as specified in Section 5.05.09 of
the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), for a communications tower and related
mechanical equipment shelters.
PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This item and its companion Variance petition were heard by the CCPC at their October 15,
2009 public hearing. However, due to issues raised by CCPC members necessitating further
research, the applicant requested a continuance of the hearing, which was ultimately rescheduled
for January 7, 2010.
The specific questions raised by the CCPC are listed below, with staffs responses highlighted in
bold font:
CU-2008-AR-14085
12/17/09
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 12 of 191
I. Was a certificate of occupancy ever issued for the new tower and, if so, why wasn't the
old tower dismantled as required by the approving Conditional Use Resolution (No. 93-
219)?
The new tower was properly inspected and did receive the required certificate of
occupancy prior to becoming operational. However, because the Building
Department inspectors do not refer to the approved resolution to verify that the
conditions of approval attached to them, if any, have been fulfilled, they did not
know of the condition of approval attached to Resolution No. 93-219 that required
the old tower to be dismantled. Nevertheless, ensuring compliance with such
conditions of approval is normally under the purview of Zoning and Land
Development Review staff, and occurs at the time of site development plan (SDP)
review and approval. However, in this instance, the applicant needed to maintain
the old tower on the site until after the new tower was erected so that the existing
antennae could be transferred from the old tower to the new one 'l'\'ithont an
interruption in service. Because of this unique circumstance, Zoning and Land
Development Review staff should have required a note on the SDP stating that the
old tower had to be removed after the transfer took place, so that it might have beeu
clear to the building inspector that it needed to be dismantled. However, it should be
noted that the approved SDP did not depict the old tower-only its concrete pad-
and referred to the new tower as the "replacement tower." The application
submitted with that SDP was also unambiguous about the applicants' intent to
dismantle the old tower, stating "This SDP amendment is only to replace the existing
communications tower structure" and "alllhe antennas on the existing tower [will bel
moved to the new tower... and the existing tower removed."
2. LDC Section 5.05.09. G.3 allows standalone communications towers with Conditional
Use approval, provided the tower is owned by, or leased to, an essential service that is the
primary user. What is the difference between an essential service "tower" versus an
essential service "antenna"?
CU-2008-AR-14085
12/17/09
The LDC defines a tower as
"a structure whose primary
purpose is to raise the height
of an antenna." No definition
is provided for an antenna or
for the "primary user."
Nevertheless, staff has
historically defined a
primary user as a
governmental entity whose
antenna must remain on the
tower for as long as the
tower exists; so while other
commercial users are free to
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 13 of 191
use a particular tower and then relocate their antennae to other towers as needed,
the governmental entity's antenna is obligated to remain. As such, it is staff's
opinion that any tower with an essential service's antenna(e) mounted on it is an
essential service tower.
3. Can the essential service user be a leasee? If so, what happens to the other antennae on
the tower if the essential service user decides not renew their lease? Does the tower have
to come down?
According to LDC
Subsection 5,05.09.G.3,
towers may indeed be
leased to a governmental
entity, The LDC is silent
as to what would happen
to the non-essential
service users' antennae
on a tower should the
essential service user
decide not renew his
lease and move his
antennae elsewhere. (For
a list of the commercial
tenants on the site's
towers, see Appendix 1.)
However, pursuant to a
policy memo by the Zoning Director, an essential service tower in the E zoning
district may not be without a replacement essential service user for a period of more
than six months, or else a Code Enforcement violation would be initiated to have the
tower dismantled.
4. What is the required "collapse zone" for the tower?
Normally, the required collapse zone for towers over 185 feet is 2.5 times the tower's
height from any adjoining residential zoning districts. However, essential service
towers are exempted from this reqnirement. Nevertheless, the applicant has
provided staff with a certified letter frum a Florida-licensed engineer (Appendix 2)
testifying that, in his opinion, due to the design of the guy lines on the subject
towers, "it is virtually impossible for the tower[s] to fall in a straight line the way a
tree might." Rather, if a tower were to collapse, it would "fall in upon itself in an
accordion-type fashion, with the debris contained within the anchor radius of the
guy cables."
5. Are lights required for the subject towers since they are in excess of 150 feet?
CU-2008-AR-14085
12/17/09
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 14 of 191
Yes. The project was reviewed and approved by the Collier Mosquito Control
District, who determined that only one of the towers needed to maintain either a
solid red beacon or a dual mode light since the towers are a mere 50 feet apart.
However, as noted in the letter from the agency provided to the applicant (see
Appendix 3), this exemption is strictly limited to the subject site only and would not
automatically apply to other sites in the County. Mosquito Control also informed
staff that, due to the towers' heights, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
might still require hoth towers to maintain lights. As such, a condition of approval
has been incorporated into the attached resolution requiring that both towers be
equipped with lights unless a waiver of this requirement is granted by the FAA.
6. Are communications towers routinely inspected by the County?
According to LDC 5.05.09,G.14, guyed towers exceeding 185 feet are to be inspected
every two years by an engineer or other qualified professional, and any
recommended repairs are to be made without delay. The report ofthis inspection is
required to be filed with the County Manager no later than December 1 of the
applicable inspection year, and if such report recommends repairs, a letter verifying
that tbe repairs have been made is also required to be submitted to the County
Manager following to their completion. To ensure tbat this requirement is fulfilled,
staff is mailing notification letters to each of the affected tower owners informing
them of this biannual requirement. The reports subsequently submitted by these
owners will then be reviewed by County Engineering staff and maintained on file
with the repair reports, if any. Staff will be following up with the CCPC on this new
protocol after the New Year in order to apprise them of its status.
7. What happened to communications tower on Tower Road? Why did it collapse?
This tower collapsed under usual circumstances in that its failure was not caused by
a hurricane, tornado or other violent wind, but rather by a propane fire that was
ignited while the tower was being welded. The heat from the gas-fuelled fire actually
melted the steel lattice, provoking its collapse.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on December 10,2009.
RECOMMENDATION:
Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends that the cepe forward Petition eu-
2008-AR-14085 to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a recommendation of approval,
subject to the following stipulations:
CU-2008-AR-/4085
/2//7/09
4
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 15 of 191
I. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Conceptual Site Plan, identified
as "Overall Site Plan," prepared by Black and Veatch, and dated September 28,2007, as
revised through April 9, 2009. The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for Conditional
Use approval only. The final design must be compliance with all applicable federal, state,
and county laws and regulations.
2. Development on the site shall be restricted to 3,359 square feet of impervious area.
3. Maximum height of the two towers on the site shall be limited to 455 feet, including
antennae, lightening rods and other appurtenances.
4. Both towers on the site shall be equipped with either solid red beacon or dual mode lights
unless a waiver of this requirement is granted by the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA).
5. All guy line anchors shall be fenced pursuant to LDC 5.05.09.G.l2.
6. One tower on the site shall be owned by or leased to a governmental entity for
government-related, essential service purposes. Should this entity remove its antenna(e)
from the tower, the property owner shall immediately notify the County and replace the
antennae e) with another essential service user within sixty days.
CU-2008-AR-14085
12/i7/09
PREPARED BY:
~l~~
JO . -DAVID MOSS, AICP, PRINCIP AL PLANNER
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REVIEWED BY:
~~.~
/SUSAN M. ISTENES, AICP, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 16 of 191
h.~ 2.--1 J Df
ATE'
/Z-!l.'(tJ7
I ATE
I~J.;),~ 'j
DA
/.2./.31/#
I f DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the February 23, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Meeting
MA
CU-2008-AR-14085
12/17/09
6
(-,1- {O
DATE
AGffim?Fl-J4!,I1'l, ~9.. 7 A
~ptK' 'J';Y,"20 1 0
Page 17 of 191
Co1Mr County
~
STAFF REPORT
TO:
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM:
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HEARING: OCTOBER 15, 2009
SUBJECT: PETITION CU-2008-AR-14085, FLO TV INCORPORATED (COMPANION
TO VARIANCE PETITION V A-PL-2009-037)
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Owner:
FLO TV, Inc.
5775 Morehouse Drive
San Diego, CA 92121
Agent:
James J. Porter, Esq./Kimberly J. Madison, Esq.
Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster and Russell, P.A
40 I East Jackson Street, Ste. 2700
Tampa, FL 33602
REOUESTED ACTION:
To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application for
Conditional Use Number 3 for communications towers and related mechanical equipment shelter
in the Estates (E) Zoning District, as specified in Section 5.05.09 of the Collier County Land
Development Code (LDC).
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The approximately 4.77-acre subject property is located at 5860 Crews Road, which is south of
Davis Boulevard and east of County Barn Road, in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26
East, of Collier County, Florida (see the location map on the following page).
PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
On May 25, 1993, Resolution No. 93-219 (see Appendix I) was approved for a Conditional Use
on the subject property to allow the replacement of an existing 438-foot guyed communications
tower and its associated mechanical equipment structures with a 430-foot guyed communications
tower and a 2,400 square-foot building. Six years later, due to a federally mandated frequency
and power change that could not be accommodated on the site's tower and antelUla, the owner of
CU-2008-AR-14085
September 24. 2009
Page loJ8
In
<(
,
....., lorl
~~ 1
I ~~ *1
1010..
I 1
II -Obi;,
I' ~ .l_....1
z
o
UJ-
I-~
ii)o
3
Q~
::>'
"-II
~
I ~"
Ii w g;
~_N.!..._ :...:
I' ~
w
~
O~
::>.
"- ~
fW05Ol.JOH / ""-
-
p
i,
il
I
· IIi
w
g,j:
"13
I "
Ii
g
i
i ·
'"
'"
o
i
')l
::)
()
..
z
o
l-
e:
UJ
a.
a..
<(
~
z
o
I-
<(
o
o
.....I
,...,",,""_.'l~""".."":'~~-
<(I
(///
:;)1
03
-II
u..'
$;
'OJ
lIl.
;a,
5. ~ n
~ is
;~I
!;r iii
~I ~~~~w 2
ili ;\',,;~.5 n~
~il ~~1l~~ . w
l;I! e~:g~8 · ~
=r ::a~. ~
[l
[J
I
I~ II
I
I
~
I
I I
I I I
I I
11=1
FI
, . .
. . .
. a ft
V
b
. , ; ~ ;
II!; a!~5Ii.~~'l
I .'11 ~ i. I ~
ni91~~ 1.111 I I
iii i I I IH! h ;!li;!
nlllll !HHI ;! illHI
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 20 of 191
the property, Renda Broadcasting, amended the SDP to allow for another replacement
communications tower with a much stronger 394-foot tower. However, instead of removing the
tower and erecting a new one, as per the approved SDP, the new tower was simply erected
approximately 50 feet away from the existing tower, thereby expanding the use on the site. Not
only was this additional tower in violation of the approved SDP, it also contravened Resolution
No. 93-219, which permitted only one communications tower, and further stipulated that any
"expansion of the uses... or major changes to the site plan submitted... require the submittal of a
new conditional use application..." It was not until the applicants, who lease tower space from
the owners, attempted to permit an antenna on what was supposed to be a dismantled tower that
the County became aware of this violation. In order to redress the infraction and comply with the
terms of the approved resolution, the applicant has submitted the subject Conditional Use
application, which if approved, would legitimize the existence of the additional communications
tower and allow for the expansion of the use on the site.
As shown on the Conceptual Site Plan on the preceding page, entitled, "Overall Site Plan,"
prepared by Black and Veatch, and dated September 28,2007, as revised through April 9, 2009,
the unmanned facility is somewhat centrally located on the site, allowing the E Zoning District's
required 75-foot front and rear yard setbacks and 3D-foot side yard setbacks to be well exceeded.
The two existing communications towers and their accessory equipment shelters are shown
enclosed within a chain-link fence. The towers are spaced 50 feet apart and linked by elevated
walkways labeled as "coax bridges." The walkways connect the towers to a newly proposed 224
Aerial View
square-foot equipment shelter, which would house a generator and transformer, and would be
mounted by two new dish antennae and a GPS antenna, Two existing parking spaces for the
facility are also shown within the facility's gates, accessible via a private drive from Crews
Road. A dead-end, dirt spur road provides access for maintenance vehicles to the tower-
CU-2008-AR-/4085
September 24. 2009 Page 2 oj 8
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 21 of191
supporting guy lines and anchors adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site (these guy lines and
anchors, as well as others on the western boundary of the property, are the subject of the
companion Variance application). Along the northern boundary of the site, a 20,786 square-foot
conservation easement is proposed. Because the site is heavily wooded, as shown in the aerial
photograph on the preceding page, the existing vegetation would serve to satisfy the project's
perimeter buffer requirements. Because of the limited nature of the proposed change, 79.3
percent of the site would remain as open space.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North:
East:
South:
West:
Vacant land, zoned Falling Waters PUD
Vacant land, zoned Falling Waters PUD
Crews Road, then vacant land, zoned E
Vacant land, zoned Falling Waters PUD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
The subject property is designated Urban-Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on
the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the GMP. Relevant to this petition, the designation permits
non-residential uses, including utility and communication facilities.
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with and complementary to the
surrounding land uses as set forth in the LDC. It is the responsibility of the Zoning and Land
Development Review staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety to perform this
compatibility analysis.
Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes that the proposed Conditional Use may be
deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element.
CU-2008-AR-/4085
September 24, 2009
Page 30f8
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 22 of 191
ANALYSIS:
A Conditional Use is defmed in the LDC as, "A use that due to special circumstances is not
permissible in a zoning district, but may be appropriate if controlled as to number, area, location,
or relation to the neighborhood." Per LDC Section 10.07.02.0, before any Conditional Use can
be recommended for approval to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), the Planning Commission
must make a finding that: I) approval of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public
interest; 2) all specific requirements for the individual Conditional Use have been met by the
petitioner; and 3) satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following maners,
where applicable:
I. Consistency with the Land Development Code and the Growth Management Plan.
As noted above, the existing communications towers are consistent with the provisions of the
Urban Residential Subdistrict of the GMP. The LDC also permits communications towers as
a Conditional Use in the E Zoning District provided that they are owned by or leased to an
essential service, which is also the primary user. Pursuant to LDC subsection 5.05.09.G.3,
"essential services" are governmental uses that include, but are not limited to, safety service
facilities, such as fire stations, sheriff's substations or facilities; emergency medical service
facilities; or any other similar use where a communications tower could be considered a
logically associated use. It should be noted that while there is no definition in the LDC, staff
has historically construed a "primary user" to be any approved governmental entity which
must remain on the tower for as long as the tower exists. Therefore, while other commercial
users' are free to use the tower and then relocate their antennae to other towers as needed, the
governmental entity is obligated to remain. As noted in the applicant's narrative statement
(Exhibit D to the application), the new tower would meet this provision as the primary user
would be the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), an agency of the US Department of
Justice.
Since Resolution No. 93-219 was approved for a Conditional Use to allow the replacement of
a tower that was never actually removed, staff determined on April 3, 2008 via a zoning
verification letter (ZLTR 2007-AR-I2825) that the old tower was an iIlegal use. As such, the
purpose of the subject Conditional Use is to seek approval of the expansion of the use,
pursuant to Resolution No. 93-219, and legitimize the old tower's existence alongside the
newer tower.
Both the GMP and LDC subsection 5.05.09.G.9 encourage the placement of more than one
tower on a site, provided that all setbacks, design and landscape requirements are met and the
structures are only located as close to each other as technically feasible so that the failure of
one tower would not cause the failure of (or present an unacceptable risk to) any other tower
on the site. Although staff would normally insist that this tower comply with the
aforementioned E zoning district's provision to have an essential service as the primary user,
in this instance, staff would consider the subject property to be an essential service site since
the other tower would already have a governmental entity as its primary user.
CU-2008-AR-14085
September 24, 2009
Page 4 018
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 23 of 191
The LDC permits essential services towers to be up to any height as required for the
particular use at its specific location. According to the applicant, the height of the towers
proposed would be approximately 450 feet, which measurement includes the tower and the
pole-mounted antennae at the top. (It should be noted that Resolution No. 93-219 did not
have any height restriction for the tower on the site.) However, because the towers are in
excess of 150 feet, the project was required to be reviewed by the Collier Mosquito Control
District, who determined that the towers would need to maintain either solid red beacon or
dual mode lights, pursuant to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards and as
required by LDC
5.05.09.G.13. As an
essential service, the towers
would also be exempt from
the collapse zone
requirements for towers
over 185 feet (which is 2.5
times the tower's height
from any adjoining
residential zoning districts).
Therefore, with the
conditions of approval
recommended by staff and
the Board of Zoning
Appeals' (BZA) approval
of companion item V A-PL-
2009-037, the facility
would be consistent with
all of the applicable provisions of the LDC.
'~~,':I.!""""'='_"","'w.""",)"""",'''=''''''''''''I'i:'';\~.''''''Ii<',\'''~''''"",t(':>".~"*i""<\~~~,^"'~",'i'.L"""~"'.'''''''='\J~.'''',_\"""""~,,,.',.,,,~",,,,""'~',;.,.",.,..""":~"",,
2. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control,
and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the application and has determined that no
transportation issues are associated with the project. As previously noted, the facility is
unmanned, and the site is only occasionally visited by a service crew member to perform
routine maintenance. The facility is accessible to these vehicles via Crews Road, and two on-
site parking spaces have been provided on the site, as required pursuant to LDC subsection
5.05.09.G.l1.
3. The effect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to
noise, glare, economic or odor effects.
As previously noted, the two communications towers and accessory structures are surrounded
by vacant and wooded E-zoned properties. As the subject property is similarly vegetated,
existing flora on the site would serve as a buffer between the facility and adjacent properties,
as permitted by LDC subsection 5.05.09.G.21. Presently no offending noise or glare is
generated by the facility. Although if the surrounding properties were to eventually develop,
CU-2008-AR-14085
September 24. 2009
Page 50/8
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 24 of 191
these buffers, combined with the site's enhanced setback yards, would effectively mitigate
potential impacts.
4. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district.
As noted in the application, the site has been the location of a single communications tower
and its mechanical equipment shelters for nearly 30 years (for which Resolution No. 93-219
authorized replacement); and the two existing towers have been in continuous operation on
the site since 1999. During this time, there have been no recorded complaints from adjacent
property owners. Moreover the facility is separated from the closest single-family home by a
distance of over 300 feet, and further buffered by 75 feet of vegetation. Due to this plant
material, the facility's somewhat isolated location on the site, and the limited nature of the
proposal (to legitimize an existing tower and add a 224 square-foot equipment shelter) any
impacts on the surrounding neighbors would be minimized.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
Pursuant to LDC Section 8.06.03 0.1 Powers and Duties, the EAC did not review this petition
because the site is less than ten acres and is not in a Special Treatment (ST) area or an Area of
Critical State Concern (ACSC).
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
(Provided by Cheri Rollins, Administrative Assistant)
The applicant duly noticed and held the required NIM at the Fairfield Inn by Marriott on April
15, 2008 at 5:30 p.m. No one from the community attended, and the meeting was officially
ended at 5:45 p.m.
One letter of objection to the construction of a new tower (which the application does not
propose) was received from the community. However, staff later received a call from this
property owner, who asked that the letter be rescinded once he understood the application was to
legitimize the two existing towers.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed this staff report, revised on September 30, 2009.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition CU-2008-AR-14085 to the BZA with a
recommendation of approval, subject to the following conditions:
I. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Conceptual Site Plan, identified
as "Overall Site Plan," prepared by Black and Veatch, and dated September 28, 2007, as
revised through April 9, 2009. The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for Conditional
Use approval only. The final design must be compliance with all applicable federal, state,
and county laws and regulations.
CU-2008-AR-J 4085
September 24, 2009
Page 60/8
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 25 of 191
2. The southernmost tower shall be owned by or leased to a governmental entity as the
primary user of the tower and shall be for this entity's government-related purposes.
3. Maximum height of the two towers on the site shall be limited to 455 feet, including
antennae, lightening rods and other appurtenances.
4. Development on the site shall be restricted to 3,359 square feet of impervious area.
5. Maximum height of the towers on the site shall be limited to 455 feet, including
antennae, lightening rods and other appurtenances.
6. All guy line anchors on the site shall be fenced.
ATTACHMENTS:
Appendix 1: Resolution No. 93-219
CU-2008-AR-14085
September 24, 2009
Page 70/8
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 26 of 191
PREPARED BY. "
~~~~ 'lJ?eJ01
JOHN- ill MOSS, ICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER TE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REVIEWED BY:
~ 0:- .~l~ jo ~ I-o,!
RAY NDV.BELLO .S,ZONINGMANAGER DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
/J~---rn. /~ /0/1/09-
~USAN M. ISTENES, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE
DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
/q/~d'f
DATE
~j:j:J]~~M
MA \P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN
( . "7 - to
DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the December 1,2009 Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting.
CU-2008-AR-/4085
September 24. 2009
Page 8 0[8
<(O~
r--~C'>
o~
ON_
~, ~O
" 'r--
N
- ..: Q)
- ,"0>
co <( co
'0 a.
c:
'"
0>
<(
~m~
t 0
Oll~o;;
<(
<(
-
~ ,
C ~
::l
l:I. <D
U.
::;; a..
0:
<(
~
(9
Z
-
Z
0
N
<D
U.
::;;
0:
I
!I
~I
0,
'1'1
n'?SOl '-'IN / . ::>'
- #01
ZI
0:
!:I
:;;1
"-
a..
<(
~
Z
0
-
f-
<(
()
0
.....J
! ~
o :~Oll
~ -Ii
Z
WQ
0-';(
Vio
9
C
::l
l:I.
:! :~
I w ~~
~---IJ:'
I~
C
::l
l:I.
UJ
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 28 of 191
~~ Ruden
~II McClosky
401 EAST JACKSON STREET
SUITE 2700
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602
(813)314--6709
FAX: (813) 314.6809
KlMBERL Y.MADlSON@RUDEN.COM
December 16, 2008
John David Moss, Principal Planner
Collier County
Zoning & Land Development Review
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
CU-2008-AR-14085 REV: 1
RENDA BROADCASTING
Project: 2008070019
Date: 12/24/08 DUE: 1/27/09
Re: Application for Conditional Use - Collier County (the "Application")
5860 Crews Road, Naples, Florida (the "Property")
Applicant: MediaFLO USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Our File No, 60479-0001
Dear John David:
The Applicant seeks approval of its Application for Conditional Use to permit the co-
location of broadcast equipment on an existing wireless tower located at 5860 Crews Road, in
Collier County, Florida (the "Project"). The Project will essentially entail the addition of a
cellular antenna and broadcast equipment to an already existing, functioning tower and as such
will require only minor alterations, at best, to the site as it presently exists. There will be no
additional employees stationed at or accessing the site due to the installation, and no additional
building square footage will be associated with the Project.
Applicant's request is consistent with the County's desire to "maximize the shared use of
specified tower sites to minimize the need for additional tower sites," as set forth in Section
5.05.09(A) of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The Project is consistent with
LDC provisions governing the standards for design, vegetation screening, construction and
facilities setting for communications towers.
In connection with the above-referenced Application, and on behalf of the Applicant,
MediaFLO USA, Inc., enclosed please find the following documentation for your review and
consideration:
I. Twenty (20) copies of the signed Application for Conditional Use;
2. One (1) check for the Application Fee, in the amount of$7,073.00;
3. One (I) original, signed and notarized Agent Affidavit;
TPk663997,1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
ROCA AATON . CARACAS' fT.LAUDUDALE . MIAMI' NAPLES' ORLAN(}O . I'OIlT ST.lUCIE . SAItASOTA . U. P'HERStIURC . TAlLAHASSEi . TAMPA' WEST PALM. BEACH
John David Moss
December 16,2008
Page 2
Agenda Item No.7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 29 of 191
4. One (1) original, signed and notarized Owner Affidavit;
5. One (1) copy of the Addressing Checklist signed by Addressing;
6. Twenty (20) copies of the Pre-Application Meeting Notes and Submittal
Checklist;
7. Twenty (20) Conceptual Site Plans (24" x 36"), plus one (I) 8 Y, x II
copy;
8. Two (2) copies of the warranty deeds;
9. Five (5) copies of aerial photographs showing FLUCCS Codes, Legend,
and project boundary;
10. Five (5) copies of the Listed Species Survey for the Property;
11. Five (5) copies of the Wetlands Jurisdictional Determination for the
Property;
12. One (1) copy of the Statement of Utility Provision;
13. One (1) CDROM containing an electronic copy of all documents and
plans; and,
14. Two (2) signed and sealed Boundary Surveys.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require additional copies of any of the
above-referenced documents, or to address any questions regarding this Application.
;;:~~u
Kimberly J. Madison
KJMlkcw
Enclosures
cc: Thomas Voltero, Esq. (w/o enclosures)
TP A:663997, 1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
80CA Il4.TON . CARACAS' FT. lAUDERDAU . MIAMI' NAPLES' ORLANDO. PORTST. LUCIE' SARASOTA' Sf. PfTEltS8URG . TAlLJ.HASSEf . lAMPA . WBl PALM Il:ACH
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
, DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET
(i)
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE l(jMeO of 191
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 252.2400 FAX (239) 643-6968
M"'.~" F;""...1'".l"~''1"a'''l'"-'''~'''''"'''' . -', -~-._,-.. ":fflI
t;1:~~;l;l""'f"!f;!~~'~.'r,' ~ ,r i ','j"\~I~; 'T .~ '1""jr~ j"r_ ~~'i"", .... ''',~.r1",J''i1
. ..' , ' "'~';I'! ' ':J ' ',,'.1,' ',u ,":~~
, ,f};:~"'~il!i\li,"~~iF.i4i~'~"J:l;,~,w."~,,,.,, , , ,t'"Il\i;\ ,~,.<
~t;'l~ftJ~:'J "'?j~ (\ I~' ~w'". r ~J, 1 ,1' ~" 7~!. :~t I r~({,,> If"')
Jt.J~,~, ~' ( " g;, ~.,};'" h",' \ 0,~t
".."i\,'.~~ .~~"~.!... " .,~,' . ,.._~J.".,,,,-",. "_~' 1
PETITION NO (AR)
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE PROCESSED
ASSIGNED PLANNER
CU.2008.AR-14085 REV: 2 ]
RENDA BROADCASTING
Project: 2008070019
Date: 3/18/09 DUE: 4/15109
ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF
rllf;~C:;.;'.'1'1',l'JW.:ij''''~~''' r "-"~'!fC,'.':i;r~"".,,,.- ~
& ~j~;.BJ~' I~~~~~ J I ( J.l.~."~", l 'It ;:,!:~~~~' ~ ~ ru}~J
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) MEDIAFLO USA,INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION
ADDRESS 5775 MOREHOUSE DRIVE CITY SAN DIEGO STATE CA ZIP 92121
TELEPHONE # (858) 651-3244 CELL # FAX #
E-MAIL
NAME OF AGENT JAMES J. PORTER, ESQ.
FIRM RUDEN MCCLOSKY
ADDRESS 401 E. JACKSON ST., SUITE 2700 CITY TAMPA STATE FL ZIP 33602
TELEPHONE # (813) 222-6620 CELL # FAX # (813) 314-6920
E-MAIL ADDRESSJIM.PORTER@RUDEN.COM
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE - 4/14/03. rev 5/2012005. rev 2/12/0B. rev. 7/14.08
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 31 of 191
~r~1iQtii1Zr,i._~~!~;t~'h\"ro\~' I<fr;("I,..,~I'1 r'O P .. ~~::'\ ,::-:j;,~ (' r""j I',,' . .~1i r''''' ',;",' 'Jt'~ ~ ',I 1.' \ ,J l.'i:;:t.:~
~~~tmiE::If4!IIg.n'f~"::~JJ:::t.Pt~ : ;:':'j;(~~,,~~~';:;:~ ~~, I I , . < 'J'~ ~1 h.::: J " I ", _;..' .:> \ f.i~:l
Complete the following for all registered Assoclatlon(s) that could be affected by this
petition. Provide additional shee.. If necessary. Infonnatlon C8I1 be found on the
Board of County Commissioner's web81te at hlID:/Iwww.coUleraov MtIIndex...Dx?DIl_774
Please see Exhibit "A", attached.
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIAll0N:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIAll0N:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION:
I,
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
. NAME OF MASTER ASSOCIAll0N:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
NAME OF CIVIC ASSOCIAll0N:
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
,"DfSCLoSURE.QfIN1'f5RQr;,"F()RMATlOf,t"
a. If the property Is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the
entirety, tenancy In common, or Joint tenancy, list all parties with an
ownership Interest as well 8S the percentage of such Interest. (Use
additional sheets If necessary).
Name and Address Percentage of Ownership
Not applicable.
b. If the property 18 owned by 8 CORPORATION, list the officers and
stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each.
APPlICA TlON FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONOmoNAl USE - 4/ /4/0J, rev S/20/2oos, rev 2//2/08, rev. 7//4.08
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 32 of 191
Application for Conditional Use
5860 Crews Road, Naples, Florida (Existing Address)
5864 Crews Road, Naples, Florida (proposed Address)
Applicant: MediaFLO USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Exhibit A
List of Surroundine Rel!istered Homeowners and Master Associations
1. Falling Waters Beach Resort, Phase II
Mr. Thomas Powers, President
6660 Beach Resort Drive, #6
Naples, FL 341 14
2. Falling Waters Condominium Owners Association I
Mr. Tom Lee, President
2202 Hidden Lake Drive, #7
Naples, FL 34112
3. Falling Waters Homeowners Association II
Mr. Tim Boyle, President
2274 Hidden Lake Drive, #9
Naples, FL 34112
4. Magnolia Cove of Falling Waters
Mr. Raymond C. McCabe, President
2338 Magnolia Lane, #2
Naples, FL 34112
5. Cascades of Falling Waters Condo Association
Mr. George W. Baker, President
1972 Cascades Drive, #1
Naples, FL 34112
6. Cascades at Falling Waters
Mr. Robert Hinklin, President
2004 Cascades Drive, #1
Naples, FL 34112
7. Falling Waters Beach Resort Master Association
Mr. Donald K. Bassett, President
6580 Beach Resort Drive, #3
Naples, FL 34112
TPA:642048J
Name and Address
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Percentage of OwnersMiple 33 of 191
See attached listing of officers for Renda Broadcasting
Corporation, attached as Exhibit "B",
c. If the property is In the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the
trust with the percentage of Interest.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
Not applicable.
d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list
the name of the general and/or limited partners.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
Not applicable.
APPLlCAnON FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE - 4/14/03, rev S/ZO/ZOOS, rev Z/IZ/08, rev. 7/14.08
'www,sunbiz.org-Department of State
Agenda Item No. 7 A
~t3)~10
Page 34 of 191
I'", I ,I I)I,J' \ I 1',11 .: II .,. I
1):11'-:1'\ "I ('''I\J'lll~ ',II" ,
Home
Contact Us
E-F1l1ng Services
Document Searches
Fonns
H
Previous on List Next on List
Return To List
r---'~________.,._
I
No Events
No Name History
r ._.~,.. '..
Detail by Entity Name
Foreign Profit Corporation
RENDA BROADCASTING CORPORATION
Filing Information
Document Number P30305
FEI Number 251259502
Date Flied 07/26/1990
State PA
Status ACTIVE
Principal Address
10915 K-NINE DR
BONITA SPRINGS FL 34135
Changed 07/0212007
Mailing Address
900 PARRISH ST
4TH FLOOR
PITTSBURGH PA 15220
Changed 0412612000
Registered Agent Name & Address
RENDA, ANTHONY F
RENDA BROADCASTING CORP
10915 K-NINE DRIVE
BONITA SPRINGS FL 34135-6802 US
Name Changad: 0710212007
Address Changed: 0710212007
Officer/Director Detail
Name & Address
Title DPT
RENDA, ANTHONY
MERRIMAN RD.
SEWlCKLEY PA 15143
I
EXHIBIT
B
http://sunbiz.org/seriptslcordet.exe?action-DETFIL&inCLdoe _number=P30305&in'L earn... 121212008
'www.sunbiz.org - Department of State
Age'1f'Jl691-tlI~ 7 A
lIltlril"1W, >'010
Page 35 of 191
. Ti1Ie DVS
RENDA, CATHERINE R.
MERRIMAN ROAD
SEWlCKLEY PA 15143
Title V
SERENA, ALAN C
3111 CHESTNUT RIDGE DR
PITTSBURGH PA 15205
Title DV
KELLY, MARYANN
114 ALPINE CIR
BELLE VERNON PA 15012
Title V
REICH, JUDY
506 COVENTY TRAIL LANE
MARYLAND HEIGHTS MO 63043
Annual Reports
Report Year Flied Date
2006 0711712006
2007 0710212007
2008 0212812008
Document Images
0212812008 ANNUAL REPORT
0710212007 ANNUAL REPORT
0711712006 - ANNUAL REPORT
0311412005 - ANNUAL REPORT
03/01/2004 ANNUAL REPORT
0412212003 ANNUAL REPORT
0312412002 _ ANNUAL REPORT II" . u_ ........- ,- .D"'...... :J
0511512001 ANNUAL REPORT
0412612000 - ANNUAL REPORT
0311611999 ANNUAL REPORT
0411411998 ANNUAL REPORT
0412111997 ANNUAL REPOID
0510111996 ANNUAL REPORT J :u."..."....,...~.. "'.....,,-~_. 1
0510111995"- ANNUAL REPORT II" -. lA_.."_...._........._A. "1
I Note: This is not official record. See documents if question or conflict I
http://sunbiz.org/scripfslcordetexe?action'''DETFIL&in~ doc _number=P30305&in~ earn... 1212/2008
'www.sunbiz.org - Department of State
Ager1S\\3...I1ElfT1~flI~ 7 A
.~it'1~:!010
Page 36 of 191
Previous on List Next on List
Return To List
i
Ir". ,....",......< .
No Events
No Name History
Home Contact us Document Searches E-Allng Services forms Help
Copyright and Privacy Policies
Copyright @ 2007 State of Flortda, Department of State.
http://sunbiz.orglseriptslcordet,exe?action=DETFIL&inCL doc _number=P30305&inCL earn... 12/2/2008
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
e. If there Is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an Individual or in8illMdii'at8i91
a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract
purchasers below, Including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or
partners.
Name and Address
Percentage of Ownership
Not applicable.
Date of Contract:
f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list
all Individuals or officers, If a corporation, partnership, or trust.
Name and Address
Not applicable,
g. Date subject property acquired ~ Owner acquired property on January 13,
1999. leased 0 Term of lease yrs./mos.
If, Petitioner has option to buy, Indicate the following:
Date of option: Not applicable.
Date option terminates: , or
Anticipated closing date:
h. Should any changes of ownership or changes In contracts for purchase
occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final
public hearing, It Is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his
behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of Interest form.
APPLlCAnON FOR PU8L1C HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE - 4/14/03, rev S/ZO/200S, rev Z/12/0B, rev. 7/14.08
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 38 of 191
"'f 'h,ij.'r!",f1~'~~1li~~~;,,;~~.i"~I,~~.,..1
Detailed leaal description of the orooerty covered bvthe ilDollcalion: (J1 space is
inadequate, attach on separate page.) If request Involves ch.n~ to more than one
zoning distrl(;i, Include separate legal description for propertylnvotved In each
dlatriel. Applicant shallaubmit four (4) copies of 111 racent surwy (completecl within
the last six monthe, maximum 1" to 400' scale) If required to do aD -' the pre-
application meeting.
NOTE: The al:lpllcant II rasponsIble for supptylAgthe.correct Jessi deserlptlon. If
questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's ceJtlflcatlonor sealed
survey may be required.
SectionITownahlplRange 06150/26
Lot: Block: Subdivision: Also kI'lown as l.ot 20, Enchanted Acl'e$
Plat Book Page #: Property 1.0.#: 00405160008
Metes. &. Bounds Description:
SIZE OF PROPERTY: ft. X ft. = Total Sq. Ft. Acres 4.n ac
(207,781.20 s.f. m.o.l.)
ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5860 Crews Rd., Naples, FL
(existing address), 5864 Crews Rd., Naples, FL (proposed address)
"J(,j'!!:"i';:':~;~~~.r:~~~"-'~;~~','.;l
Zoning
Land use
N PUO
S E
E PUO
W PUD
Non-agricultural acreage I vacant
Non-agricultural acreage I vacant
Non-agricultural acreage I vacant
Non-agricultural acreage I vacant
Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject
property? If so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If
space is Inadequate, attach on separate page). Not applicable.
SectlonITownshlp/Range
Lot: Block: Subdivision: Not applicable.
Plat Book Page #: Property 1.0.#:
APPLlCAnON FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONOlnONAL USE - 4/14/03, rev 5/ZO/ZGOS, revZ/12/G8. rev. 7/14.08
I
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 39 of 191
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Property located in Collier, FL
The West one-half(W Va) of the Northwest one-quarter (NW Y.) of the Southeast one-
quarter (SE Y.) of the Southeast one-quarter (SE Y.) of Section 8, Township 50 South,
Range 26 East, Collier COImty Florida, also known as Tract No. 20, Enchanted Acres,
less the South 30 feet for road right-of-way purposes.
AND BEING the same property convcyed to Renda Broadcasting Corporation, a
Pennsylvania corporation from Sterling Communication Corporation, a Florida
corporation by Warranty Deed dated January 13, 1999 and recorded January 20, 1999 in
Deed Book 2503, Page 1624.
Tax Parcel No. 00405160008
EXHIBIT
I G
Metes Be Bounds Description:
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 40 Df 191
,,',40tlDmeW:l$tjJEtIQ_:;DV~L;' ,';1';~:';?~f;;t""
'""..1
TVDe of Conditional Use:
This application is requesting a conditional use allowed per LDC Section 2.04.03 of the ~
zoning district for installation of broadcastino eouioment and antenna to existino tower (type
of use).
Present Use of the Property: Existing communication tower.
":":,1':"f'~i~~r,'.'":,,,,'r;,.,, "':/;""f:':<',
Evaluation Criteria: Provide a narrative statement describing this request for conditional
use. See Exhibit "D", attached.
NOTE: Pursuant to Section 10.08.00. of the Collier County Land Development Code, staffs
recommendation to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission's
recommendation to the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be based upon a finding that the
granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the publiC Interest and that the
specific requirements governing the individual conditional use, If any, have been met, and
that further, satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning the
following matters, where applicable. Please provide detailed response to each of the
criterion listed below. Specify how and why the request Is consistent with each.
(Attach additional pages as may be necessary).
a. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code
and Growth Management Plan (include information on how the request is consistent with
the applicable section or portions of the future land use element):
b. Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and
proposed structure thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety
and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe:
c. Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties In relation to
noise, glare, economic impact and odor:
d, Describe the site's and the proposed use's compatibility with adjacent properties and
other properties in the district:
APPLICAnON FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDlnoNAt USE - 4/14/03. rev 5120/2005, rev 2/12/0B. rev. 7/14.08
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
e. Please provide any additional information which you may feel Is relevant to this re~.41 of 191
Deed Restrictions: The County Is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions,
however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the
civic or property owners association In the area for which this use Is being requested In order
to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions.
Previous land use Detltlons on the sublect DrODertv: To your knowledge, has a public
hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that
hearing? No.
. Offlclallntel'Dretatlons or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an
. official Interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year?
~ Yes 0 No If so, please provide copies. See Exhibit "E", attached.
AddlUonal Submittal reaulrementa: In addition to this completed application, the following
must be submitted In order for your application to be deemed sufficient, unless otherwise
waived during the pre-application meeting.
a. A copy of the pre-application meeting notes; See Exhibit "F". attached.
b. Twenty (20) copies of a 24" x 36" conceptual site plan [and one reduced 8W x 11" copy
of site plan], drawn to a maximum scale of 1 inch equals 400 feet, depicting the followlng
[Additional copies of the plan may be requested upon completion of staff evaluation for
distribution to the Board and various advisory boards such as the Environmental Advisory
Board (EAB), or CCPC];
. all existing and proposed structures and the dimensions thereof,
. provisions for existing and/or proposed ingress and egress (including
pedestrian ingress and egress to the site and the structure(s) on site),
. all existing and/or proposed parking and loading areas [include matrix
Indicating required and provided parking and loading, including required
parking for the disabled),
. locations of solid waste (refuse) containers and service function areas,
. required yards, open space and preserve areas,
. proposed locations for utilities (as well as location of existing utility services to
the site),
. proposed and/or existing landscaping and buffering as may be required by the
County,
. location of all signs and lighting Including a narrative statement as to the type,
character, and dimensions (such as height, area, etc.);
APPLICA noN FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONOmONAL USE - 4//4/01, rev 5/ZOj2005, r~v 2/1 Z/08, rev. 7/14.08
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 42 of 191
c. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as required by Section 3.8. of the Land
Development Code (LDC). Not required.
d. Whether or not an EIS is required, two copias of a recent aerial photograph, (taken
within the previous twelve months), minimum scale of one Inch equals 400 feet, shall be
submitted. Said aerial shall identify plant and/or wildlife habitats and their boundaries,
Such identification shall be consistent with Florida Department of Transportation Land
Use Cover and Forms Classification System. See Exhibit "G", attached.
e. Statement of utility proVisions (with all required attachments and sketches); See Exhibit "H",
attached.
f. A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS), unless waived at the pre-application meeting;
Not required.
g. A historical and archeological surveyor waiver application If property is located within an
area of historical or archaeological probability (as Identified at pre-application meeting);
Not required.
h. Any additional requirements as may be applicable to specific conditional uses and
Identified during the pre-application meeting, Including but not limited to any required
state or federal permits.
BE ADVISED THAT SECTION 10.03.05.B.3 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
REQUIRES AN APPLICANT TO REMOVE THEIR PUBUC HEARING SIGN (S) AfTER
FINAL ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. BASED
ON THE BOARD'S FINAL ACTION ON THIS ITEM, PLEASE REMOVE ALL PUBLIC
HEARING ADVERTISING SIGN(S) IMMEDIATELY.
~~~. '0""". .,/f.
,..,.~lII\~,:~:'!r
~~ t<;,;,(:j:i ~'J',,1"'-"1~MJ 1 :-'l.'~' :;\; ~ul. I~ '~'r~~., ;f'\:~k;.:',:},,:~t,~~.'" I .'('jt.,'lf
...
Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name)
at its expense shall record In the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of
Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that
contains the legal description of the property that Is the subject of the land use
petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer
specified In the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable
to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, F5.
A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the assigned
Principal Planner, Collier County Zoning Department, within 15 days of recording of
said Memorandum or Notice.
APPLICATION FOR PU8LIC HEARING FOR CONDIOONAL USE - 4/14/03, rw S/ZO/ZOOS, Il!V 2/1Z/08. Il!V. 7/14.08
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 43 of 191
AppliClltiOD for Conditional Use
5860 Crews Road, Naples, Florida (ExistiDg Address)
5864 Crews Road, Naples, Florids (Proposed Address)
Applicant: MediaFLO USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation
~
Narrative Statement
The Applicant seeks approval of a conditional usc request to permit the co-location of broadcast
equipment on an existing wirclcss tower located at 5860 Crews Road (existing address), in Collier
County, Florida (the "Project"). The Project will essentially entail the addition of cellular antenna and
broadcast equipment to an already cxisting. functioning tower and as such will require only minor
alterations, at best, to the site as it presently exists. There will be no additional employees stationed at or
accessing the site duc to the installation, and no additional building square footage will be associated with
the Project.
a. The Project Is consisteDt with the Collier COUDty LaDd Development Code (LDC) aDd
Growth ManaKemeDt Plan.
The Project is consistent with the County's desirc to "maximize the shared use of specified tower sitcs to
minimize the need for additional tower sites," as set forth in Section 5.05.09(A) of the LDC. The
essential service provider for the Project is the U.S. Department of Justicc, FBI, an agency of the Federal
Government, in compliance with Section 5.05.09(G)(3) of thc LDC. The Project is consistent with the
LDC provisions governing the standards for design, vegetation screening, construction and facilities
setting for communications towcrs.
b. Means of ingress aDd egress to the Property and proposed structure; automotive and
pedestrian safety; traffic flow aDd coutrol; access in case of fire or catastrophe.
The Property features an existing private access road from Crews Road as a means of ingress and egress
to the Property for maintenance vehicles and in the event of frre or catastrophe. There are existing
parking spaces on thc Property for maintenance vehiclcs. As the facility is an un-manned site, no
alterations to the existing parking or to the existing means of ingress and egress on the Property are
required. Pedestrians and the general public will not have access to the site.
c. The Project will have a minimal effect on nelghborinK properties with regard to noise, glare,
economic impact and odor.
The Project involves the installation of an additional antenna to an already existing communication tower
and will require the addition of an enclosed generator. Notwithstanding, the Project will have only a
minimal effect, if any, with regard to noise and glare to neighboring properties given (i) the tower already
exists and (ii) the Project involves only the addition of equipment to the existing tower.
The Project will havc no known effect on neighboring properties with regard to odor or economic impact.
d. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties iD the district. The
compatibility of the site with adjacent properties wDl not be affected by the co-location of broadcast
equipment on the existing commuuications tower.
Given (i) the tower already exists and (ii) the Project involves only the addition of equipment to the
existing tower, the existing compatibility of the site with adjacent properties and other properties in the
district will not be disturbed.
TPA;63913S;1
(i)
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 44 of 191
STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS
FOR CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST
a.
b.
c.
COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT
(GPO capacity)
SEPTIC SYSTEM
1.\'iJt-";.illl" ",a':!'" .~'...,iBJIl'C~~",".~~~
NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) MEDIAFLO USA., INC" A DELAWARE CORPORATION
ADDRESS 5775 MOREHOUSE DRIVE CITY SAN DIEGO STATE CA ZIP 92121
TELEPHONE # (858) 651-3244 CELL # FAX #
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): 5860 Crews Rd. (existing address),
5864 Crews Rd. (proposed address)
1',1~"jt~<)~j@'''~'~~~;~,~E~'...~~1
Sectlon/TownshiplRange 08/50/26
Lot: Block: Subdivision: alkJa Tract 20, Enchanted Acres
Plat Book Page #: Property I.D.#: 00405160008
Metes & Bounds Description:
I ....\l.j.<.,__.~~ J!i'~~~1
"'"',-:ik'< ,~!,:w.tr4;:,>~1u:~~'i~,"<--" >' '_.. .; ,'. '. . , , " as ';:u, ,':.- _, ,-, (;"~" ~(:
(Check applicable system):
o
o
o
o
o
""';"lIPEzw;.WAlilS,EItllBJO:lMIIIlltDED~'~~~lIR!i'" . ...
o
o
o
o
d.
e.
a.
b.
c.
COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM
CITY UTILITY SYSTEM
FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM
PROVIDE NAME
PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL)
":,
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDlnONAL USE - 4/14/03, rev S/ZO/ZOOS. rev 2/1Z/08, rev. 7/14.08
d.
1I'r~"_.-r.. l1V.:
{ '0 .q,\ r ~{ d' I
A. WATER-PEAK AVERAGE DAILY
B. SEWER-PEAK AVERAGE DAILY
IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER
SYSTEM, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED Not
applicable,
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 45 of 191
filA.. ~ol_ "'" __''I'!I Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic
drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding
the method of affluent 0 and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then
percolation data and soli involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a
professional engineer.
I' " 'l,r' ?J: -
_I If the project is located within the
services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement
shall be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and
sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of
these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time.
This statement shall also Include an agreement that the applicable system development
charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance
of building permits by the County, If applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an
agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer
systems.
. 00 ,0'Unless waived
or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or
potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that
provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided.
APPLlCA TION FOR PU8UC HEARING FOR CONDmONAL USE. 4/14/03, rev S/ZO/ZOOS, rev Z/ 1 Z/08, rev. 7/14.08
!
.~
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 46 of 191
April 3, 2008
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Community Development and Environmental Services Division
Department of Zoning and Land Development Revicw
2800 North Horseshoe Drive' Naples, Florida 341 04
Margaret Smith
MediaFLO USA
c/o Redna Broadcasting
2 Larkspur Ct
Greenfield, NY 12833
HE: Zoning Verification Letter ZLTR-2007-AR-12825. zoning verification for
property addressed as 5860 Crews Road, legally described as the West V, of Northwest y.;
of Southeast y.; of Southeast y.; Less the South 30-foot right-of-way. in Section 8,
Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Property ID No:
00405160008
Dear Ms. Smith:
In your application dated January 23, 2008 you request a zoning determination regarding
the two existing communication towers and your desire to co-locate antennas on the
tower that was to be dismantled on the subject property. The zoning for the subject
property is Estates with an approved conditional use (Resolution 93-219). As provided
below, an expansion of the original approved conditional usc cannot be granted;
furthermore, the tower designated to be dismantled remains and must be removed in
order to comply with the terms of approval of the original conditional USe.
The conditional use, referenced above, was approved on May 25, 1993 for the subject
property to allow the replaccment of the existing 438-foot guyed communications tower
and accessory structures with a 430-foot guyed communications tower and a new 2,400
square foot building. Site Development Plan (SOP) 93-62 was approved July 23, 1993
showing the new 430-foot guyed communications tower and accessory building. An
amendment to SOP 93-62 was approved July 19, 1999, proposing the replacement of the
existing 430-foot guyed communications tower with a stronger 394-foot communications
tower. Several insubstantial changes to SOP 93-62 have been approved to add
generators or co-Iocatc antennas on onto an existing tower on the site. Your application
states you would like to co-locate antelUlas on the tower that was to be dismantled. A
current aerial shows two towers existing on the subject property.
The approved conditional use provided for the replacement of an existing
communications tower; not an expansion of use by adding an additional tower. Section
10.08.00, of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), provides for conditional
use procedures and requires any additional uses or expansion of permitted uses not shown
on the conceptual site development plan or otherwise specifically provided for in the
Phone (239) 403-2400
j
.L....
EXHIBIT
E
I'--'
or (239) 213-2913
www.colIiergov.net
C;
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 47 of 191
conditional use application to undergo submittal, review and approval of a new
conditional use application. LDC Section 5.05.09.0 Slates no new tower of any height
shall be permitted in the Estates zoning dislrict except for essential services listed in
subsection 5.05.09.0.3, thereby prohibiting the expansion of the approved conditional
use,
Please be advised that the infonnation presented in this verification letter is based on the
Land Development Code and/or Orowth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is
possible that subsequent amendment(s) to either of these documents could affcct the
validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that devclopment of the subject
property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not
limited to, concurrency related to the provision of adequate public facilities,
environmental impact, and other requirements of the Collier County Land Development
Code or related ordinances.
Should you require further information please do not hesitate to call me at (239) 252-
5748.
Researched and prepared by:
Rcvicwed by:
~~~--
~ ss Goc lit, Planning Manager
Department of Zoning and Land
Development Review
~~ 4.j~ 111
hristine Wi\1oughby:~er
Department of Zoning and Land
Development Review
Cc: Correspondence File, ZLTR-2008-AR-12825
Mikc Sawycr, Senior Planncr
Peggy Jarrell, Addressing Section
r
OtLlER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
EPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOP
WW.COlUERGOV.NET
01168
.,
EXHIBIT
F
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 48 of 191
2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRM
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
(239) 403-2400 FAX (239) 643-
(i)
f
CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
PRE~APPLICATION MEETING NOTES
& SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Oat.. !t;/2t. IPS nme. ;.''?J{) Planner: ::7/) ~Ss.
P~..."":" ' 4~~ th~f'6~W.
Pralect Addr/Locatlonl lo 0 C..-rt_w .
Applicant Nom., Mr ,f.n.:':ft....j /4:'" Phan., (j18) !13....(Ddt 0
Firm.
Current Zoning,
f.
~ rL..o.
~~J-h~
Owner Name:
Owner Address.
Phone:
Meeting Attendees: (attach Sign In Sheet)
~ F tHiS
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 49 of 191
CONDrneNAL USE
(CU) APPLICATION
SUBMmAL CHECkLIST
THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER
L1mD BELOW W/COVER SHEm ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION.
NOTE. INCOMPLETE SUMBmALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
REQUIREMENTS
#OP_
COPIES REQUIRED
NOT
REQUIRED
l:
20
20
x
~
~
o EDC "Fast Trade" must subm~ approved copy of official appllccHon
o Affordable HQ\lslng "expedited" must submk copy of .Igned Cerllflcate
of A _1!IiInt.
PLANNER MARK IF NEEDED TO BE ROUTED TO REVIEWERS BELOW,
shlb the
2
Comments au d .. forwarded 10 Ill.. PIClnner Drlor 10 due dole
SCHOOL DISTRICT (JJ lARKS & REC ",Murda Smith. (I)
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS (1)
UTILITIES ENGINEERING - Zamlra Delloro (I)
COMMUNITY PLANNING 8A YSHORE/GATEWA Y TRIANGLE
COORDINATOR - UndCl BedJelyon (1) REDEVELOPMENT Executive Dlreelor (I)
CommunIcations Towe.. Onl ,
MOSQUITO CONTROL
NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY
I COLLIER CO. AIRPORT AUTHORITY (1
(I CITY OF NAPLES, Robin Sin e., Plannin DI..
2
FEES:.
~ Pre-application fee $500.00 (Applications subml"" 9 months or more aft.. the date of the
'all p.....pp meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pr..
application meeting will be required.)
r $4.000.00
$150.00
$300.00
$760.00
$363.00
~
Appliccflon fee / $1500 If filed in con(unellon with a rezone petftlon
Fire Code Review
Comprehensive Plamlng Consistency Review
Estimated Legal Advertising Foe - CCPC Meeting
Estlmated Legal Advertising fee. BCC Meeting
(ony over- or under-payment will be reconciled upon receipt of
Invoice from Naples Dally News).
$2,500.00 EIS Review, if required ;V/A
$1000.00 Ustod or Protected Specie. .Uf,/ey review fee (when an E1S Is not required)
Transportation F.... If required. ~
o $500.00 MSIhodology Review Fee. If required
o $750.00 Minor Study Review Foe. If required
o $1.so0.00 Malar Study Review fee. If required tv ffJr ~
OTHER REQUIREMENTS:
o
o
n
n
Appllcantf Agent SIgnature
Date
3
Agenda Item No, 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 50 of 191
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 51 of191
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS
LDC 10.03.05 F.
Applicant must conduct ot least one Neighborhood Infonnatlonal Meeting (NIMJ after Initial
rtaff review and comment on the application and before the Public H8Clrlng Is 5Cheduled
with the Planning Commission.
Written notice of the meeting sholl be sent to all property owners who ore required to
receIve legal notification from the County pursuont to Section 10.03.05.8.8.
Notlflcation shall olso be 58nt to property owners, condominium ond civic ossocfatlons
whose members ore Impacted by the proposed land U58 change and who have formally
requested the County to be notified.
A copy of the list of all parties noticed, and the date, time, and location of the meeting,
. must be furnished to the Zoning Deparlrtlent and the OffIce of the Board of County
Commissioners no less than ten (1 O) days prior to the scheduled dote of the NIM.
The applicant" must make arrangements for the locotlon of the meeting. The location must
be reo$Onably convenient to th.". property owners who ore required to receive notice and
the facilities must be of sufficient size to accommodate e.xpected attendance, "
The applicant must place on advertisement of the meeting In that portion of the newspaper
where legal notices and closslfled advertisements oppeor stating the purpose, location,
time of the meeting and legible site location mop of the property for which the zoning
change Is being requested. The dlsploy advertisement must be one-fourth page, in type no
smaller than 12 point and must be placed within a newspaper of general clrculotlon In the
County at leost seven (7) days prior to, but no sooner than five (5) days before, the NIM.
The Collier County stoff planner assigned to the proiect must attend the NIM and shall
Sllrve as the focllltator of the meeting; however, the oppllcant Is expected to make a
presentatlon of how It intends to develop the subject property.
The appllcont is required to audio or video tape the proceedings of the meeting and
provide 0 copy to the Zoning Deportment.
As 0 result of mandated meetings wIth the pUblic, ony commitments mode by the applicant
sholl be reduced to writing and made a part of the record of the proceedings provided to
the Zoning Department. These written commitments will be made 0 port of the rtaff report
of the County's rEl'llew and appfOltal bodies and made a part of .the consldwotion for
Inclusion In the conditions of approval.
.~./~
~
1v~ arf&'u:J.-wr.
4
j
~ ,
~
w
l!l
ffi ~
&II
2: .!
... >
0 ,:!
&II ..
~ i
f Q E
a.
~ !
I > ->
l! 0
at
'U i
c -
I a =
... 0
:,
~ c ..
.- 0
g E
Z N 'U
"'"' .';:
i o a
1: 1
~ III .l:
e 0
1: .-
a u;
Q, e
l! 'U
..' ~ j
..
0
:E 'S
'U ~ ~
'>
a LLI N
Q ~
.
C
.l: ..... -;;
0 .i
... C!)
C'I
Ii ;t e
LLI
Z It'l
Z C'I
&II :s c
~ III
a. ..a
Z Q e
~ LLI ;)
Z Z
(!) III
a Vi c
Ill: III 0
"" <C .c
a.
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 53 of 191
COLUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDRESSING DEPARTMENT
(i)
2600 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104
ADDRESSING CHECKLIST
Please complete the following and fax to the Addressing Department at 239-252-5724 or submR In person to the
Addressing Department at the ebove address,
Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting. Not all nems wUl apply to eVllry project.
Items In bold type are required. Forms older than e months will require addlUonal review and approval by the Addressing
Departmenl
PETl110N TYPE (check petition type below, complete a separate Addressing Check/1st for each Petition Type)
o BL (BlasUng Pennlt)
o BD (Boat Dock Extension)
[l,camlvaVClrcus Permit
M CU (CondlUonal Use)
o EXP (Excavation Permit)
o FP (FInal Plat
o LLA (Lot Line Adjustment)
o PNC (Project Name Change)
o PPl (Plans & Plat Review)
o PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat)
o PUD Rezona
o RZ (Standard Rezone)
o SOP (Site Development Plan)
o SOPA (SOP Amendment)
o SDPI Onsubstantlal Change to SOP)
o SIP (SRe Improvement Plan)
o SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP)
o SNR (Street Name Change)
o SNC (Street Name Change - Unplatted)
o TOR (Transfer of Development Rlghis)
o VA (Variance)
o VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit)
o VRSFP (Vegetallon Removal & SRe FlU Permn)
o OTHER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be 8/tached)
00 -2:..t.c -'8 . ~\<c.EL G..3
FOLIO (Property 10) NUMBERls) of above (ettach to, or associate with, legal description il more than one)
oe, 1.\65 \ G. C) e>o'8
STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable. If already assigned)
~e.(,,0 QR.~ 'Kt:':>
. LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location 01 projeCUslle in relation to nearesl public road rlght-oC-way
. SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties)
PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (II applicable)
PROPOSED STREET NAMES (If app~cab1e)
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only)
SOP orAR#
EXHIBIT
T
I
Page 1012
(I
c9
Agenda Item No, 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 54 of 191
ADDRESSING CHECKLIST. PAGE TWO
Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (If application; Indicate
WIlethsr proposed or existing)
Plaase Check One: 0 Checklist Is to be Faxed back
IDersonallY Picked Up
APPUCANT NAME: '-fCt.{..u.JJ~.A.. ~Q.. ~~ / /q ftDl1'"tJt,'1 ttx f-\ttpllCAn-t---
PHONE FAX
Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project andlor Street Name approval and is
subject to further review by the Addressing Department.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Primary Number q.?) 4-'2\
Address Number
Address Number
Address Number
"'_S;:~H~w(Jf
Updated by:
Date: & -~ -() '{
Date:
IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED
Page 2 of2
G:\Current'Appllcatlon ForlTl$\Albesstng Ch&r;KUst rev 04290B.doc
-....
_ D. ....-mu
QU/IILU . -
sum 3lllI
4111 '''111I1 'lUlL D.
......ISw nOllIl )4101
Ttu~ insCNment prep..'" by:
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 1 ,2010
Page 5 of 191
2122539 OR: 2503 PG: 1624
_ ll'''ltLlJ. IICOUI of alum CDIm. 11
ttllOIll at 1I,lla 11111I1, _. CUll
call IIll1l.Ot
ucm 11.11
1Ot'.1I 111."
John o. HumIJhr~i1"", hqOl~
QuarlM & !'roldy
001 Tarnlilml Trail Holth
Suil~ 300
Napl.. Flofld.1. J410J
1&11:
QlllUlIIW1
lllllUlW 11 , UII
IIILIIIl1II1l111I
WARRANTY DEED
Thl.lndenture,madethis~dayof Janu{,ry 1999,
belwew1 Slerlina Communicallon Corporation, a Florida colJlOl"lion, GRANTOR, and Renda
Broadcastinl Corporation a Pennsylvania Corporal ion, whOSt! fed"",1 employer identifICation
number is ' and whose post office address is 14S9 Crane
Avenue, pittsburgh, Penn.ylvania lS220, Gft4.NTEE.
Witnesseth that said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TfN DOLLARS.
and olher good and valuable consideration, to said Gr.mtor in hand p;lid by said Grantee, the
receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee
and Grantee's hei" and assigns forever, lhe following described land, situate, lying and beinl
in Collier Counly, Florida. //~\\'R(::O"i'0
/,..;\jY-- <../V......,
The West one-hall 1.Yf~t!l .cIlthe Norlhwell rle' (NW 1/4) 01 the
Soul....... one-quarlt;l IS Southeut on (SE 1/4) 01 Section
8, Township SO So~h. ~ Ea. ~ Coun f ido, allo known ..
TrKl No. 20, fncIjant t klr road rlsht-ol-w.y
purposes. 1.11 . 1\)1 ~I \
\('!,~.'::d.../' . /'-1
Subject to restridit\~ ~e5t'rvations a e~m&!. of ~rd. if any: and real
estate laxes for the\~'1:. 1999, and all s~~Je. nYMn, bearing Property
Identification Num~.:op4Q5160008. 1 "-J,/(:"/
'...oi:... /,,-/
and said Grantor does hereby tu1ly',w~~tjJft(Q.if.oi6 land, and will defend rhe same
against the lawful claims of all p."o~.~l"/"
In Witness Whereof, the Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal tne day and
year firstabov. wrlnen.
Sisned. ..aled and delivered
in our presence:
STERLING COMMUNICATIOIi!i.r
CORPOIVoTlON,a Florida !l'iij,oration
~
2500 Airport Road, South
Naples, Florida 34112
,
.
"f .
~ a qA'/> , , ..J
W sIn ~.
::r.t.. R 1;~~
Print name
&.1.., ~ "-'ht~":'
Witnes. '2
(LM.-~; c... will:ll"'t..o~
Print name
.'
1
QlINU'\l~U"',l
I
EXHIBIT
CJ
Agenda Item No. 7A
. ,2010
Page 56 of 191
ut OR: 2503 PG: 1625 ttt
STATE OF r 102. /I).'/'
COUNTY OF l6 off
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / i'~ day 01_
Jt;.nua'J. . 1999, by Bruce 8. Timm, as President of Sterling Communications
Corporali , (rl' who is personally known to me or I ] who produced
as identification.
I
~nla,lll/t.-' Ui. X..'-II&)
NOTARY PUBLIC (sEAl)
--LlJ.!:.f iZSJt f-) tu. I ~A{-
Name of NOlary, Prinled, Typed or Stamped
My Commission Expires:
,.;~SSlfi'OL~>,_.,,, ~
/9' ~"~o.: '~c=CUlln
( " \_-..,-~~1 '. . ~-"~ll":
;' ./ Ul-'-'~\ ...._._~--s.\ '<
, 'r7\) ~ J]t~ <---, ,,) \
i. i( i (II jllJ)\V1' i :
i""''-Y'.\.::j J. ii-I
\s.\ 1( ') /~!
\/ \ ---;\,:; 1 -,l~/
\7f. "~, \ '~;l./ "-~/
'(::(}/llsJX;()).'
~\l70a'_1
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 57 of 191
o
AFFIDAVIT
Deborah Barret. t
HetiiaFLO USA, Inc, is an Appl1cant for
a wireles.s installation on the
We/I, ~' being first duly swam, depose and say that ~~
property described herein and which is the subject malter at the proposed hearing; that all
the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest
information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part
of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. Well
understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate
and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shaf! not be
altered. Public hearings wilt not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and
all required information has been submitted.
the Applicant Kimberly J. Madison, Esq.
As "P~ Well further authorize _ to act as our/my representative in any
matters regarding this Petition.
Signature of Property Owner
2'-~~wA .
Signature at Applicant
...lllllUY UU:I Deborah Bat"rett Sr. Director I Operations
Typed or Printed Name of Owner
CU'liel: EJi'e.~ B_ ele~n.e.f1~, tt~.fla~et"
Eo.!'t~n F!s-~i~PJ
Typed or Printed Name of ~l< Applicant
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,~:~ day of ct:/ub::-t
nj:J , n t
20&, by ~ji('r1V1 !t)tV7/7Jit who is personally known to me or has produced
as identification.
ta"- - ==:~=- ~
i.; NoIar/ PubIC . CaIIfolI1IO ~
t.. san :lIegO COU'lIy d
~- - - ~~~~~
,//
(' . ....."c/.......
".'-. -' ---t.. '
(Signatyre of Notary PUblic)
'E/l()llt"- L5a?c;Z fYllu5IZttr0
(Prill, Type, or Stamp Commissioned
Name of Notary Public)
'j
APPUCAnON FOR PUBLIC HF.ARING fOR CONDlnONAL liSt - 4/14.'OJ, rev 5..'20/2005, r~v.?; 12/0t
a>
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 58 of 191
AFFIDAVIT
Wel" Bill Mueller on behalf of Renda Broadcastina Corp being first duly swom, depose
and say that well am/are the owners of the property described herein and which is the
subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this
application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other
supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to
the best of our knowledge and belief. Well understand that the information requested on this
application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether
computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be
advertised untH this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been
submitted.
Signature of Property Owner
Bill Mueller
Typed or Printed Name of Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner
7
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this c:l-'l~ay of 4d~
20~ by ~ :7~;Z -".J!;' LL<' who is personally known to me or has produced
as identification.
(Notary Stamp)
~//""~)'
-~>~ ,---? /// .. .
'~/d~ //{ / ,,t;,');:;t;,,.a-<-4
(9!9natur: of Notary PUF"i11::"N!"~j~'i~';.~}~NSYLVAN'A
lLyn", f,: Pl:'$~war~nl. Notary Pi...'b1Jc
GF_::' ~ '("" 2G~G. !~i!e'dfJ?f'\Y Gcumy
r,,/ ;':>)i~;J"':'';I(:)n::~i/r-~:. 'i7.2010
_ M _,_."____.,"
(Print, Type, or Stamp lImmissfdii-e,j"'il NamebrM:111i1'!'Public)
page 10 of 10
Conditional Une Extension Application - Feb. 2008
~C~-- '
~""'CGrhI: ~
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 59 of 191
Co/lfer Mosquito Control District
600 North Road, Naples, FL 34104-3464
Administration: (Z39) 4.35-1000/ (Z39) 436-1rJ05 (fax)
Hangar: (Z3111436-1008 / (l311) 436-1007 (fa,,)
www m1ller-mtsatJlta.orq
November 13, 2009
Dear Mr. Heckerman,
The Collier Mosquito Control District endorses your request that an exemption to the
local code requiremertts be granted with respect to the property at 5860 Crews Road,
Naples, FL with FAA registration number 1056659.
Sincerely,
Kelly Hllff
Director of Operations
....
~.
\~ (Q)
60rzrd of Commitsloner$:.
Ex~cutirte Director.
Fronk Van Esse-n, Ph.D.
Spray Sch.dult: (1.39) 436-1010
'cquf.!lyn D. Fresenius, Chair
hn F. lohman, Seaewf)'
Robert D. Geroy, Treasurer
Jeann~ f. BrQoker
Undo- M. Hartmtm
APPENDIX 3
Irnmoka/ee Substation;
J65 AIrpark Blvd, Bid!} A-IX
ImmoJm/~~ FL 34142
(Z39) 867.3Z00
! Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 60 of 191
- Renda Broadcasting - Naples towers
Tenant Roll
as of 11.25-2009
Property Name Tenant Name
Naples Renda (New) Wireless One Network, Lp, A Delaware limited Part IA T& T)
Naples Renda (New) Nextel South Corp., a Georgia Corporation
Naples Renda (New) MetroPCS California/Florida, Inc.
Naples Renda (New) T-Mobile
, Naples Renda (New) Verizon Wireless Personal Communications lP
Naples Renda (New) Sprint Spectrum L.P. a Delaware Limited Partnership
Naples Renda (New) Alltell Communications
Naples Renda (New) WSGL-FM Renda Broadcasting
Naples Renda (New) Florida Power & Light Company, A Florida Corporati
Naples Renda (Old) Lojack Corporation
Naples Renda (Old) Verizon Wireless Messaging Services (inactive)
Naples Renda (Old) US Department of Justice
Naples Renda (Old) Reach Communications
_.
APPENDIX 1
I
Agenda Item No. I A
April 13, 2010
Page 61 of 191
;r! 8~nf~;~nts
fIlA:.J Bringino" AI TogeIhor.
November 16, 2009
Structural Components, LLC
1517 PeaM Street. UnltA
Boulder. CO 80302
Voice: 866-386-7622
Fax: 303-962-3577
Jerry Heckerman
Renda Broadcasting of SW Florida
10915 K-Nlne Drive
Bonita SpMngs, FL 34 1 35
Re: Structural Review - Fall Fladlus Assessment
Structures: (1) 454' ERr Guyed Tower, (1) 454' Allied Guyed Tower
Site Ad<lresS: 5860 Crews Road, Naples, FL 33942
Site Name (#): Renda Broadcasllng (Naples)
SC Number. 090339
Dear Mr. Heckerman:
I am writing this letter in reference to your request for Siruclural Components, LLC to provide our opinion
of the expected mode of collapse for the (2) guyed iattice steel communications tower located in Naples,
Collier County, Florida. Th$ two tow,,", stand approximately 50 ft. apart from one another w~h a
maximum outer guy radii of 210 it.
The IOwe'" are designed in strict accordance with the Electronics Industry Association Standard EIMIA-
222-F, 1996 Code as well as local codes. Due to the safety factors incorporated into the design standard,
we would not expect the tower to fall the moment that the designed wind speed has been exceeded.
Allhough it is extremely rare for a guyed tower to collapse, most failures occur during catastrophic natural
disasters such as hurricanes or tornadoes In whIch total devastation to the surrounding area would also
occur. Because of the various levels of guy cables designed to support the towers, and having inner and
outer guy anchors at both tower sites, it is virtually Impossible for the tower to fall in a straight 1I~ like a
tree migh1, The expected moda of collapse would be to fall in upoo itself in an accorolon-Iype fashion with
the debris contained within the anchor radius of the guy cables.
Since there are many factors that will affect the failure of a communication lower. we would like to point
out that the moda or tower railure mentiOf1ed above is just an estimata.
We trust that this information confirms 10 you ~at towers are designed to survive rather than colJapse.
Please feel free to contact us ~ you should have any questions or require further informafion.
Best Regards.
Structural Components LLC
~~
/ r1 ,d; '"":::~ _2.---
V';'____."
Michael T. DeBoer. PE
F'orida License # 49140
Expiration 0312812011
Brad Cook, P .Eng.
VP Engineering
, /
/1/::)1"<;
APPENDIX 2
":0
r--~
.0
ON
2""
E~
~~
.
J
"
i t i
H;
ili
~i
(fJ~
::J2
o
u
o
..J2
u.2
ca~
.- J
-04
(1)6
:E4
~
E i ~
q~
; ,I A d I!
wI' 6 . II
.1n~dll
.N
o ~
o O:::~
I...J -q-
<('-'-(/]C0
(L . ~ ...J
2(/]W,-,-
<(wa::
I- ...J U -
I(L (/]
(()<(ow
I-Z:.o...J
u... coo..
2 11l~
~n
nhllll
Ih ;; i
1:'1 1~~~~
'Z..... 0"" g
II: I i!~"'-~::1
IS= ~~g~8
=;; :J ~
's~B'
~ XI- ,...
, ~u . I
I ~3 ~ I- :
~g:
'" [~
Ii '1111 ~
lillli!I .;
tlHlm" !~:s
....--., i ~~
::, t!
t) 0.0
~ I; ~i'
2 1'1,
~ 'p
t; d ,Ii
i ~~I aU
11,1 . ! ' . . , i
!! I~i;! ..
!I; I' .. <Iii i
" q.! : ~ . ii I .' ~~.
s~n; 11 ~ .. Ul!q h : I -! ~!
~ e .. ~ I~~~ !.- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ dl"
." "~ 0 ~ ~ i,' . ~ · U I ,~ . i
~I ~ ~ h nld In! H h~,
, ~
'i'
I~
sil!, ! ,~
Ji I II~
i Il~
II Hil
r- III
1.1i: I ~q
. ~ 1'( I I~ ~J
'. ~d ! ; i - r 5(1 I [" Ii:~
JW! i; d ~ Ii! ! ' I; ~ ~ ..
, I! " !If~i i . I;' ! ~ 11m ! ~ i! l . Iii;
ql~ II f~"
!11!i ~ ' r i ~ 'I' I · 'I!! ; I pi
i! II IT Hi! U IT ! !il :1 , I:!
<t ~ Ii !H III III ' mG
1Il ~~!-J~ ~
~ 11111. III
<(0 0 g~ II II i Ii I III ~'":"'":5 ~ ~ 0
r- ~ ...I I 1111 ~p ~;;~~~ ! ~ i..;:
,0 lL
~N. .. I ~ ~ i UB I , ~~~~8 ~ i
'6 u If
.. j - III 2 z >
~~ :; Oll .......1 :r 8 0
m<(
"0
c:
Cll
!i
~ i ~l il liS I
i I 1:1 1 ill l
~Im II ~III
---- -y-~- ~-,.,~,-~---) 0 /"
r - - L - ~"" ~- --~=- - -,' v.
[ -""" /'--........ m ,/', '[ dl t
I I,/' I = I r I
Iii A" ,: II i' l 1\,:1
I : ~ -' ,-t; I i
L - - ~ - - - - - - -' I, \L-=-":-=-~----,
P__C--Il""'i -p I, " (>W<.-p! II ~
I; " I; j, I 'jJ I I
" " ",' I I'
, I I
, I :
I
Hl
, ' ,
. . .
i ~ ~
I I ;, I
I h ~ ! : s I! l
I "h! ! !
l~ 191. d d il j! . h
nlllli!!llii l!
'IV
b
<C G · ;; ~'~ III !~J ~
<n ~ I! :
::J 11111. I
<(0 0 i~ 1'1 "I ~:~~ i G
r--~ -' ;.. I~ II
,0 I 1111 g~~
ON U. ! f ~
z. .. ~ It I . . ~>-~o
M 'C IHiHHI ZIZU
E~ .. :5 - i II
~~ ::!: III :1'
m<(
-0
C
'"
OJ
<( I
I
I~
(
III
I
I I
: I ,
I
I I
I ! ~ ~
J in Ui lli II J
mIlD~.. .
<' ! ~i ~n III I
(/)l ! ~G
::Jl Sinh
<(0 og ; I~ 1'1 III ~~~~ ~ % !
I'-~ ..J' R III I,: vi:vi-< ~ '":
.0 u.> I III.
.9..'" .~~ ~I~~ ! ~ I <C
i" !f g - . Hum, !~!
'OJ Iii
Gl,
==5. :!;. ......., :1'
m<(
-0
c:
'"
0>
<(
'/"'-.
- ',,---
I
I
I
!
I
, .1-'-1
I i
I
- '!
!!I U
l-._,
I
I
i
I
I
-'-'-l
I
I
I
~
i '~
Ii I iil
I
I
oi
i
,
I
.v
<l:~ :c ~n
en' u ~;j
=>i ~
<(0 O'
r-~ ..J' ~oB k
,0 lL.'
ON CO!
Z' ~ I;' I ~ ~
CO') :a~ 5
E~ Ql; j II
~~ :iE, m
(0<(
"0
C
Q)
Ol
<(
I' II ~I ~
I III II!il ~~~.JW
III ...:~ "-"",
II!. 1~, ~~~~~
iUi JUI !;!! ~~~~3
-- . --.. I :r :I ~
"\ /"
\//
// \
// \ //'
~,/' \ /
-~,=-..~-~_. '--'~'- \ /,/'
,/ "I', y'
,'::1 ' / \ 'i
~ 1// \1,,"
"'-'" . /'r(...::.------'. 'I
'. "I" . I
........ //, II '\ I
c ., I
.w
I 'I~~-
, . ~ ~ ~ z
. . i\ j:
I: W~
iV 7~ Tl
fe'0-tt~-0-/ !
i \. I
I I I III !
Ih ! I j ! n! !!: II
ill! II III! 11111 ,.
; 000080089008 ~
<{O
I'-~
,0
ON
:;;L._-)'
-5.
ro<{
-0
C
Q)
'"
<{
<l:l
00'
:Ji
O'
-',
IL'
.!!!!
'C.
ml
:;,
~ ~i
~~~
W If
~ 1
m
~n
,II
Il,'Il!h
I 1111 I
mm.
..... -- I
!~l ~J~w
~d .lo. L...l-
/111 ~~;g~
liII J~>-~8
l~' tZ!!,Z
=1' s ~
. ' ~
I i I
/'
../
../
../
../
< T
\[\
. \
1\
) \
. \
I \
1\.--;
I \
1 '
]
!
Iii
E 5 !
;0! 1 ~ ~
!Ii
dll
~ 13 B"l
I ~~ i <l:
~
1~1
:; 8
i i~;~ I.
~t~~! ."
tl!;g f
<(0
/'..~
,0
ON
Z.
CO')
E~
~~
C1l<(
1:l
c:
OJ
(J)
<(
<l:~
00'
::ll
0:
...J'
u..'
.5! ~
"0'
..l
:ii:.
II
I '
I
~i
i3 '
!\i: ~g
> ~I
r;. If~
! ~r
~. ~ ~ BB
1m :~:~~ ~ ~~
ill ~~:Ij~ ! *~: i ~
IIi! 0~,,~8 ~~ ~
ili c: ~
=r :r ~
___""M
"'....""'..0_. ""0'-""'
i Ii
I II
=:1
i
I
I !
I ,
!
I:
;j!j is ' ' ~ . III
~ ~I ! . B
:J "I ~
<(0 0 jl ~:~5 € 2~ or:
.....~ ..J r; II I, 19. lill I Ii h
.0 ...
ON l"ll i~!
--.;- '6 ~ "I" ~ ~ i
ell :5 ! III :,'
=cs.. ::i: ...
m<(
"0
C I ~
'" 'v
C>
<(
~ <
--~
I Ii
g
~ I ~ ii, I
'l' ,i ~ !I IIi
g j -II ~ h Ii
111!lpi
III I ij !Ir
iJii iid it
i 11111 lin ;1
n
!
,-
~ ~
ii
;!
~
"1
a
I, ;
't It
Ii II
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 70 of 191
Global Broadcast Services, LLC
2614 N TamIamI Trl #507, Naples, F1 34103
Ornce; 239-963-5434 EInaR: d.EDlott@ebs-R.com we: GBS-FL.COM
Tower Inspection Report
Prepared For: Renda Broadcasting
Location: Naples Florida
Contact: Jerry Heckerman, Chief Engineer
Date: December 18. 09
GBS was contracted to do a Tower Inspection plus plumb and tension on an existing
Allied guy tower located in South Naples off of County Barn Road.
Listed below are the results of the plumb and tension plus the visual inspection of the
structure,
Visual Inspection of the structure
Item
Good
Fair
Fail
Notes
1. Anchors (6) X I
2. Anchor Heads (6) X I
3. Turn Buckles (15) 'x No fiJ?;ure 8s
4, Vera Grios (6) X i
5. Tower Sections X Tower Members and
legs are in good shape
Some light surface rust
Needs wire brushing
and cold Italv (20%)
6. Tower Bolts X All bolts are in good
shape, light surface
rust on 30% or more
7. Tower Paint X Tower Paint is flaking
And verv faded
8. Tower lighting NA
Power
9. Antennas and lines X Some of the coax
needs to be secured
better
10. Tower Groundinlt X
I
11. Guy Wire Grounding X
Agenda Item No, 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 71 of 191
Global Broadcast Services, LLC
2614 N TamIamI Trl #!07, Naples, 1'134103
Office: 239-963i5434 EmaiJ: lElllott@2bsOrm we: GB1SOFL.COM
Estimated Old Tension Vert Vert New Tension Vert Vert
Correct A.B CB A-B CoB
Tensions Avg Avg Avg Avg
And sizes LeI! 2" Le1!2" LeI! 2" leI! 2"
1. 318" 1,540 860 2toB 1.5toC 1,550 ~"loB ~ loB
2.7/16" 2.080 1.560 1.5 toC 1 toC 2,100 IAn to B IA" toB
3. 9/16" 3,500 2,150 2.75 to C 2 toC 3,500 1/3"toB W'toB
4. W' 2,690 1,670 3.75 to A 3 toC 2,700 1.4"toB II3"toB
5. 518" 4,420 2,860 3.5 toC 3.25 to C 4,450 W'toB IA" toB
6. 13116" 6,830 3,650 4 toC 4.5 to A 6,800 Vz"toB Y.z"toB
7.13/16" 6,830 2,975 3.75 to C 2.75 lOA 6,800 Yz"toB lh"toA
Corrected Plumb
Transits were set up 90% apart and shot of leg A.
Transit cross lines were set up on Center of leg 10 compensate for any leg size variance.
r
[2;]
~
I','
:iI1;;-':(V",,7,,'~~a..E[;I)l~'*
-;.in,,, ,;J_:,':Mi;~11;TIf
i~~~!;
;i~.M-....~,g~;:J
Notes:
I. Existing guy wire on the first level A anchors had been spliced previously using
two preforms that were hand shake tower with no thimble. The tension caused the
preforms to fold and break over time.
2. When proper tension was applied to the splice performs broke, GBS repaired the
splice using cable clamps.
Agenda Item NO.7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 72 of 191
Global Broadcast Services, LLC
2614 N Tamlaml Trl #507, Naples, F134103
Omce: 239.963.5434 Emall: d.EDiott@ebs.l1.com we: GBS-FL.COM
This particular ( AI) guy wire should be replaced. the splice repair is only a temp
measure and GBS does not guarantee the splice.
Tower has light surface rust that needs to be wire brushed and cold galvanizing
compound applied to those areas.
After the plumb and tension was done to the tower on the Dee 17, 09 the tower now
passes inspection.
Regards,
Darryl Elliott,EE
GBS
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 73 of 191
Due Diligence
Inspection Report
M
~~"F. R " "
, ,
Naples, FL
FL-4031
Presented to:
Jerry Heckerman CE, Renda Broadcasting of SW
Florida
10915 K-Nine Drive
Bon~a Springs, FL 34135
gc StrucbJral
as ~f!1re~nts
11117 Pear', Unit A I Bouldar, CO I (&00/584-&1139
November 17, 2009
Completed by:
Wes Culver
Field Engineer Manager
Structural Components, LLC
DUE DILIGENCE INSPECTION
Naples, FL
Technicallnfonnation:
Site Location:
Coordinates:
Stru ctu re:
Manufacturer:
Design:
InsDection Details:
Dates of Inspection:
Inspected By:
Inspected in Accordance With:
5860 Crews Road
Naples, FL 33942
Latitude:
Longitude:
Support Type:
Connection Type:
Height:
Face Width:
ERI
Unknown
August 19th, 2009
November 18th, 2009
N 26.1258330
W -81.7213890
Guyed
All-Weld
448 ft.
5T C-C
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 74 of 191
Ryan Beach, Field Eng., Structural Components LLC
Darryl Elliot, C.E., Global Broadcast Services
Collier County, FL Guyed Tower 2 Year Inspection Requirements
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 75 of 191
Introduction
At the request of Renda Broadcasting, Structural Components. LLC and Global Broadcast Services have
completed an acceptance s~e review of this tower in conformance w~h Collier County's Tower Inspection
Requirements.
The scope of work included but no! limited to the visual inspection of the structural members and
connections, in add~ion to the appurtenances and transmission lines, The tensions and alignment of the
tower were measured in accordance with TIA-222-G Annex J "Maintenance and Cond~ion Assessment".
Measurements of the tower alignment and guy tensions can be found attached.
Structural Components has also created a 'Priority Rating System and Rust Classification' to assign a
value to the cond~ion and priority, which needs to be addressed. This is to help the Owner allocate funds
and resources to address maintenance issues now andlor In the future. A full list and description of these
ratings can be found in the section ent~led .Prlorlty Rating System and Rust Classification" sheet,
followed with an overall summary of the tower with recommendations.
It is important to note that this report does not comment on the structural adequacy of the tower, only its
physical cond~ion that can be reasonably ascertained by visual inspection.
For a list of all specific work preformed while on site, please refer to the Collier County, FL Guyed Tower
Inspection Requirements.
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 76 of 191
Priority Rating System and Rust Classification
A priority is placed on each conclusion or recommendation made in this report to help the Owner in
allocating funds for remedial work or future attention.
Conclusions and recommendations are assigned a priority rating of A, B, C, 0, or E. These ratings are
related to safety, structural integrity, system performance, and proper maintenance of the tower and
attachments.
Priorities are assigned based on safety standards as well as the experience and knowledge of our
engineering staff. In all cases, safety is of paramount importance.
Priority categories are defined as follows:
Priority A - Safety Criteria:
This includes items or faults which, if not corrected, may lead to collapse or failure of the structural system
or antenna or pose a threat to the safety of personnel that might be on the site.
Priority B - Performance Criteria:
This includes items or faults which have or will impact on the quality of transmission signals received or
transmitted. These faults are generally related to faults in antennas and transmission lines, their
mounting, connectors, and grounding.
Priority C - Maintenance Criteria:
This includes items or faults which do not have an immediate effect on the tower but rather items and
faults that, if not corrected. will in time shorten the service life of the tower or its elements.
Priority D - Future Attention:
This includes Items or faults which require either attention by a Professional Engineer qualified to work
with Communication Structures or attention on a regular basis by qualified tower inspection personnel.
Priority E - Housekeeping Criteria
This includes items or faults related to ease of access to the tower, the ladder condition, anti-climb
condition, fencing, gates. locks, access roads, etc.
RUST CLASSIFICATION:
Levell
Initial surface rusting that can be easily removed (Priority C)
Level II
Initial surface rusting that cannot be easily removed by sanding (Priority C)
Level III
Surface rusting with initial pitting of steel (Priority A)
Level IV
Significant rusting of steel with up to 10% area of steel loss (Priority A)
Level V
Significant rusting of steel with area of steel loss exceeding 10% (no longer safe to climb,
Priority A+)
Agenda Item No, 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 77 of 191
Overall Summary and Recommendations
During our srte visit, we noted the following deficiencies, Following each deficiency Is a recommendation
for the remedial action to bring the tower into compliance:
Priority A - Safety Criteria
No problems noted
Item Priority B - Performance Criteria
No problems noted
Priority C - Maintenance Criteria
No problems noted
Priority D - Future Attention
No problems noted
Priority E - Housekeeping Criteria
No prOblems noted
Section
Recommendations ..,
Recommendations
Recommendations
Recommendations
Recommendations
I Agenda Item No. 7A
I April 13, 2010
Page 78 of 191
Maintenance and Condition Assessment
A. Structure Condition CondltlonsINotes
1 Damaged members (legs and bracing) No bent or damaged members were found
durinQ inspection.
No loose members were found during
2 Loose members inspection. Bolts were checked visually on entire
tower and spot-checked with wrench.
3 Missing members No problems noted
4 Loose andlor missing bolts/nut locking device No problems noted
5 Visible cracks in welded connections No probiems noted
I Agenda Item No. 7A
, April 13, 2010
Page 79 of 191
-.
B. Finish CondltlonsfNotes
1 Paint andfor galvanizin9 No problems noted
Levell rust on some structural members
(approximately 3%-5%). This will not affect
Rust andlor corrosion condition including structure condition, but should be monijored. If
2 mounts and accessories rusting increases ij should be removed wijh a
wire brush or similar and affected areas should
be cold-9alvanized with a minimum of (2) coats
of 95% ZRC.
3 FAA or ICAO color markino conditions No problems noted
4 Water collection in members (10 be remedied, No prOblems noled
e.g., unplug drain holes, etc.
-
Agenda Item No, 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 80 of 191
c. lighting ConditionsfNotes
1 Conduit, junction boxes, and fasteners No problems noted
Iweather-tinht and secure)
2 Drain and vent openings (unobstructed) No problems noted
3 Wiring condition All cables are secure and showing no signs of
deterioration.
4 Ught lenses No problems noted
5 Bulb condition No problems noted
Strobe lighting was inspected and appears to be
6 Controllers (functioning) functioning at the proper intensity for day and
nicht modes.
a. flasher No problems noted
b. Photo control No problems noted
c. Alarms No problems noted
D. Grounding
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 81 of 191
Connections
CondltlonslNotes
All connections and Cad Welds were found to
be in ood cond~ion.
No problems noted
2 Corrosion
Agenda Item NO.7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 82 of 191
E. Antennas and Lines CondltlonsfNotes
1 Antenna Condition No problems noted
2 Mount andlor ice shield ~ndijiOn (bent/loose, No problems noted
andlor missin" members
3 Feed line condition No problems noted
4 Hanger ~ndijjOn (snap-ins, boll on, kellum No problems noted
nrins etc.
5 Secured to struclure All antennas, mounts and coax lines were found
to be oroDerlv secured to structure.
.F. Other Appurtenances
(walkways, platforms, sensors,
f100dll hta etc.)
1 Condition
2 Secured to structure
CondltionsINot~,
No problems noted
No problems noted
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 83 of 191
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 84 of 191
G. Insulator Condition CondltloRs/Notes
1 Cracking and chipping No insulators present.
2 Cleanliness of insulators
3 Spark gaps set properly
4 Isolation transformer condition
Agenda Item No, 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 85 of 191
H. GuyS CondltlonSINotes
1 Strand condition (corrosion, breaks, nicks, No problems noted
kinks, etc.)
2 Guy hardware condition No problems noted
a. Tumbuckles or equivalent No problems noted
isecure and orooerlv aoolied\
b. Cable thimbles properly in place (if required) No problems noted
c. Service sleeves properly in place (if No problems noted
reauired)
d. Cable connectors (end fittings) No problems noted
(i) Cable clamps applied properly and No problems noted
bolts tiaht
(ii) Wire serving properly applied No problems noted
(iii) No signs of slippage or damaged No problems noted
strands
(iv) Preformed wraps - properly
applied, full wrapped, and sleeve in No problems noted
olace
(v) Poured sockets secure and howing No problems noted
no seoaralion
Some cotter pins are beginning to rust. These
(vi) Shackles, boits, pins, and cotter will not affect the structures condition, but
pins secure and in good condition should be monitored and replaced in the future if
necessarv.
3 Guy tensions Satisfactory, see attached charts
4 Record temperature, wind speed and direction 85F; sunny; calm
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 86 of 191
I; Concrete Foundations CondltionslNotes
1 Ground conditions No problems noted
a. Settlement, movement or earth cracks No problems noted
b. Erosion No problems noted
c. Site Condijion (standing water, drainage, No problems noted
trees etc.
2 Anchorage conditions No problems noted
a. Nuts andlor nut locking device (tightened) No problems noted
b, Grout condition No problems noted
c. Anchorages andfor anchor rod condition No problems noted
3 Concrete condition No problems noted
a. Cracking, spalling or splitting No problems noted
b. Chipped or broken concrete No problems noted
c. Honeycombing No problems noted
d. Low spots to collect moisture No problems noted
J. Guyed Mast Anchors
1
CondltionsJNotes
2
3
Settlement, movement or earth cracks
Backfill heaped over concrete for water
shedd in
Anchor rod condttion for water shedding
Corrosion control measures (galvanizing,
coating, concrete encasement, cathodic
rotection s stems etc.
Anchor heads clear of earth
No problems noted
No problems noted
No problems noted
No problems noted
4
No problems noted
5
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 87 of 191
Agenda Item No, 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 88 of 191
K. Tower Alignment ConditionsfNotes .,
..:
1 I Tower Verticality Satisfactory, see attached chart
2 I Tower Twist Satisfactory, see attached chart
3 I Guy Tensions Satisfactory, see attached chart
!.
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 89 of 191
Naples, FL
Reference
Elevation
0.33 0.60
380 0.01 -0.67 0.67 11.40
1.15 2.40
300 0.57 0.34 0.57 9.00
0.67 3.00
200 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00
0.33 1.80
140 -0.01 0.33 0.33 4.20
0.00 1.20
100 -0.01 0.33 0,33 3.00
0.33 3.00
o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
. Denotes outside allowable ran e. otherwise satisfacto
COMMENTS: from TIAfEIA-222-G
1. Section 13.3.3 recommends that the horizontal distanca between the vertical centertines
at any two elevations shall not exceed 0.25 percent of the vertical distance between the two
elevations,
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 90 of 191
Naples, FL Twist Measurements
Reference Twist with Allowable Twist Relative Twist Allowable Twist
Elevation respect to with respect to between reference between reference
10 ft. elev. 10 ft e/ev. points points
Ift.\ Id........es) (deareesJ (dell....esl {deareesl
400 0.87 5.00
0.29 1.00
380 0.58 5.00
0.00 4.00
299 0.58 5.00
0.58 5.00
199 0.00 5.00
0.29 300
137 -0.29 5.00
0.00 2.00
99 -0.29 5.00
~- -0.29 5.00
0 0.00 0.00
0.00 . .. 0.00
. Denotes outside allowable range, otherwise satisfactory.
Guy
Elevation,
.,
Naples, FL
:/" w::", ;;,,:
To Guy Diam.
Anchor and Type
(ft.)
392
360
299
199
137
99
Or;)
A6 1" B.S.
A5 1" B.S.
A4 1-3/6" B.S,
A3 1-3/6' B.S,
A2 1"B.S
A1 1-1/8" B.S.
,
.,"
'.
"
Guy Tension Measurements
Measured'
Tension
at 60 Deg:'F
.,.....'., (kips)
12.63
11,53
23.70
24.25
12.87
14.92
Recpmmended
Design LT.
at 60 Deg, F
(kips)
12.20
12.20
23.20
23.20
12.20
1560
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 91 of191
9.76
9.76
18.56
18,56
9.76
12.46
Tensions
(Allowable)
(kips)
to
to
to
to
to
to
392
360
299
199
137
99
B6
85
B4
B3
B2
B1
1" B.S.
l' B.S.
1-3/8' B.S.
1-3/6' B.S.
1" B.S
1-1/8" B,S.
12.33
13.06
22.49
24.95
12.63
14.53
12.20
12.20
23,20
23.20
12.20
15.60
18.30
18.30
34.80
34.60
16,30
17.94
9,76
9.76
18.56
18.56
9,76
12.48
to
to
to
to
to
to
18.30
18.30
34.80
34.80
18.30
17.94
392
380
299
199
137
99
C6
C5
C4
C3
C2
C1
1" B.S,
l' B.S.
1-3/8' B.S.
1-3/8" B.S,
l' B.S
1-1/8" B.S,
12.98
11.36
21,90
24.91
12.16
16.51
12.20
12.20
23.20
23.20
12,20
15,60
9.76
9.76
16.56
18.56
9.76
12.48
to
to
to
to
to
to
18.30
18.30
34.60
34,80
18.30
17.94
" Denotes outside allowable range, otherwise satisfactory.
COMMENTS: from TIAlEIA-222-G
1. Section 7.6.1 recommends that initial tensions (LT.) in the guys, for design purposes, is normally
10% of the published breaking strength of the strand, wrth upper and lower limits of 15% and 8%,
respectively.
2. When using initial tension values greater than 15%, consideration should be given to the possible
effects of aolian vibration. Likewise, when using initial tension values less than 6%, consideration
should be given to the effects of galloping and slack-taut pounding.
3. Design guy initial tensions at 600F are assumed to be 10% of the breaking strength of the steel cabie
and applicable at the anchor.
4. 1 kip = 1000 Ibs,
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 92 of 191
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW TWO
COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS WITHIN THE ESTATES ZONING
DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5.05.09 OF THE COLLIER
COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED IN SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida,
and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish,
coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection
of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among
which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals (Board), being the duly appointed and
constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as
in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use
of two communications towers within the Estates Zoning District pursuant to Section 5.05.09 of
the Collier County Land Development Code on the property hereinafter described, and the
Collier County Planning Commission has made findings that the granting of the Conditional Use
will not adversely affect the public interest and the specific requirements governing the
Conditional Use have been met and that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made
concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection
10.08.00.0. of the Land Development Code; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board
in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented.
Mediafio USA, Inc. CU-2008-AR-[4085
REV. 03110110
Page t of2
Agenda Item No, 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 93 of 191
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
Petition Number CU-2008-AR-14085 filed by Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of
Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., representing Renda Broadcasting Corporation, with
respect to the property hereinafter described in Exhibit "A", be and the same is hereby approved
for a Conditional Use for two communications towers within the Estates Zoning District
pursuant to Section 5.05.09 of the Collier County Land Development Code, in accordance with
the Conceptual Site Plan described in Exhibit "B" and subject to the Conditions found in Exhibit
"C". Exhibits "A", "B" and "C" are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and super-majority vote, this _ day of
,2010.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
By:
FRED W. COYLE, Chairman
, Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
Steven T. Williams ;,>
Assistant County Attomey~f.iO"lO
Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Legal Description
Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Conditions
CPI08-CPS-00918\51
Mcdiaflo USA, Inc. CU-2008-AR-14085
REV. 03/10/10
Page 20f2
,r
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 94 of 191
Exhibit A
LEGAL DESCIUP1'ION
Property located in Collier, FL
nIB West one-half (W "I) of the Northwest one-quarter (NW \<I) of the SoutheMt one-quarter
{SE 'A) of lhe South86$t one-quurter (se \4) of Section 8, Township 50 South, RBnge U East,
Collier County Florida, a1$0 Icnown as Tract No, 20, Enclumted Aares, lesa tho $outh 30 feet for
rood right-of-way purposes.
AND BEING tbe same properly conveyed to Rends BroodOll8ling COIporslion, a pennlYlvania
corporation from Sterling Commuulcation Colporation, a Florida cotporalion by WlllT!l~ Deed
dated IIII1\W'Y 13, 1999 and recorded Ianuary 20, 1999ln Deed Book 2~03, l'aJl& 1624:
Tax Parcel No. 00405160008
R.M:63-42SJ6:1
~I
~l
iii
.!!II
lil.
:;;,
I dU.' ....11......
Sf in
_..D~~mG
,.
I I ;
! I
L. r-I
rl
, . ,
. . .
i = I
1'17
Ii
0' q: II :
II' L~5 II'l
I "II I . I I
II IllAdddll I I
Ilil lllg!~ Ii iqq!
lllllllllilU I. U,'II
~
ell
-
:l5
~
Agenda Item No, 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 96 of 191
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CU.2008-AR.14085
January 12,2010
1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Conceptual Site Plan,
identified as "Overall Site Plan," prepared by Black and Veatch, and dated
September 28, 2007, as revised through April 9, 2009, The site piau noted is
conceptual in nature for Conditional Use approval only. The final design must be
compliance with all applicable federal, state, and county laws and regulations.
2. Development on the site shall be restricted to 3,359 squarc feet of impervious
area.
3. Maximum height of the two towers on the site shall be limited to 455 feet,
including antennae, lightening rods and other appurtenances.
4. Both towers on the site shall be equipped with either solid red beacon or dual
mode lights unless a waiver of this requirement is granted by the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA).
5. All guy line anchors shall be fenced pursuant to LDC 5,05.09.0.12.
6. One tower on the site shall be owned by or leased to a governmental entity for
government-related, essential service purposes. Should this entity remove its
antenna(e) from the tower, the property owner shall immediately notify the
County and rcplacc the antcnna(e) with another essential service user within six
months.
Exhibit C
<(o~ <1:1 x P' ill ;: g
u r~
r-~'" <Il' ~ i'l ~~~~5 B
o~ ::J~. "'I
ON4- , !llll
_ ~ 0 0" !~~~~
'r- r;oll 'i" N <(
-I' t~ hi! t.otg'<{O
'" 11-' Ez;g4!:O
_':Q) ",l ~ ~~e . ~ ' ~; , ~
- a. '" -j
'" <( '" ", .~ I ! ~ :1'
" a. m.
e :a, m
<ll
Ol
<(
: I I
I I
, I
I
I
I ~!
~! .
~ I;
;t
~~
~~
I I
~j :1
I I I
I I :
;~
F11
. I ;; II
I !l l ! ; ; ,
! I r I~! ! i
n li1udd'lll
nil I Jj' I I, !!
II 'II II~
HIII~ 1111 i~
~ ~
dry
II
111~ I
I! 1'1 I. ;1
!~ lii;i;i
~
J I~
"
~ ts ,^
II
~
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 98 of 191
~
Ecological, Enl'ironmental, Agricultural Land Management. Pennitting, Septic Evaluations
_...-;0:...... .,~,_~'""'... _
Ramsey Inc.
_.~~;.~r:-:~~~~
LEP, CWB, CFEA, REPA, CEHP
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
"'-"-._-
----:.....'.... =w:.
-
LEP . Lic~nsed Environmental Professional
CWB . Cenified Wildlife Biologist
<..."FEA . Certified Florida Environmen4l1 Assessor
REP A . Registered Environmental Property Assessor
CEHP. Certified Environmental Health Professional
OSHA 5 - Hazardous Materials Incident Comm:.mder
E-mail: Ramsey.[nc@embarqmail.com
Office, 239.564.1660. Fa" 866.334.1496
2631 4lh SL NW, Naples, FL 34120
www.ramscymc.net
REV' 1
CU_2008-AR-14085 .
RENDA BROADCASTING
Project: 20080700~UE' 1/27/09
Date: 12/24/08 .
08 October 200R
Ms. lady Lima
Black & Vealch Corp.
601 Walnut Street
Suite 550 W
Philadelphia, PA 19106
PROJECT: Renda Broadcasting Corp., Black & Veatch Tampa OJ I;
PID 00405160008 :
Street Address; 5860 Crews Rd.;
City, Naples; State; Fl.; County; Collier;
See 08 Twn 50 Rge 26; Road Frontage; 330 feet; Acres; 5.0
Ms. Lima.
Please find attached a Listed Species and Wildlife Survey Report for the Renda Bmadcasing Corp., site in Naples,
Rorida, Collier County, Tampa 011.
Please call if you have any questions.
Best regards
~
Michael R. Ramsey
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 99 of 191
Ecological, Environmental, Agricultural Land Management, Penniuing, Septic EvaJuatiolll!l
;;....1'"..,
Ramsey Inc.
~:;;;;~ '"P:~~- .__::::.,;;,"ft.U
LEP, CWB, CFEA, REPA, CEHP
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
.',. .~.u._
.................'--
.:.11
LEP - Licensed EnvirorllT\l..""l1tu:! Professional
CWB . Certified Wildlife Biologist
CFEA - Certified Florida Environmental Assessor
REPA ~ Registered Environmental Property Assessor
CEHP . Certified Environmental Health Professional
OSHA 5 - Hazardous Malerials Incident Commander
E-mail: Ramsey.Inc@embarqmail.com
Office: 239.564.1660, Fax: 866.334.1496
2631 4 <h 51. NW, Naples, FL 341 ~O
www.rarmeyinc.net
LISTED SPECIES WILDLIFE SURVEY REPORT 2008
PROJECT: Renda Broadcasting Corp., Black & Veatch Tampa Oll
DATE: 10.08.08
BY: Michael R. Ramsey
Rall~Y Inc.
Owner: Renda Broadcasting Corp
County: Collier
City: Naples
Size: 4.77 acres
Legal Descriptions: PID 00405160008
5860 Crews Road;
Section 08; Township 50, Range 26
INTRODUCfION
The applicant Renda Broadcasting Corp. has applied to the for the necessary pennits to expand its existing operation of
communication towers and broadcasting in Collier Co. (Figure I and 2). The following protected specieslwildlife
survey report was done to meet the submission requirements for each agency involved.
This report evaluates if the above described project property is utilized by any wildlife, and any species listed by
the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS).
METHODS
First, the project properties were surveyed and a map prepared of the habitut types on site. Second, the official lists
of protected species were obtained from each of the agencies (FWC & FWS). The FWC list all species classified
as protected by the state of Florida government. The FWS list all species that are classified as protected in the state
l'>f Florida by the United States government. Third, each species on each list was researched a, to county of
occurrence and required hahitat in the literature. Last, all species that were indicated as being found in Collier Co.
and having a habitat type that occurred on the projecl properties were searched for by surveys on the project
properties.
RESULTS
Survey Oates For this survey period the property was visiled on 09124, 09126, 09127, 09/30. 10103 and 10104 in 2008,
Surveys were done in the morning (AM) 2-3 hours after sllnrise and in the evening (PM) 2-3 hours before sunset. Survey
routes are shown in Figure 3.
Agenda Item No, 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 100 of 191
R~nd3 Rmadcasting corp. Black & Vr=atch T3mpa 011
PID ()()4.OSt6UOO8, 5860 Crews Rd.
Li~t~ Species Wildlife SlIJ"'cy
08 Cktober 2008
PJge2
Habitat. The Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) was utilized to
produce the habitat maps for the project properties. The habitat or FLUCFCS maps are depicted in Figure
4 for the Yahl Mulching project. Table I below indicates the acres for each habitat type.
Table 1. FLUCFCS acres for the Yahl Mulching and Recycling property.
ID# Acres FLUCCS #
Habitat Tvpe
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
3.73
0.06
0.15
0.38
0.22
0.15
0.08
624
624
740/310
740/8212
74018145
419
419
PinelCypressfPaJm
PinelCypressfPaJm
Disturbed LandfGrass Prairie
Disturbed LandfCommunication Towers
Disturbed Landf Access Driveway
Other Pine
Other Pine
The Renda Broadcasting Corp (Tampa 011) property presently has a communication tower broadcasting operation
in place on 0.60 acres. This property has been impacted by road construction on the north, south, east and west
sides of the property. This construction has effectively cut off sheet flow across the property, except for unusually
high rainfall events. Impacted hydrology appears to be the cause of the pine trees and melaleuea being present
with present in cypress transition areas in the 624 habitats. It is also the reason for the heavy melaleuca infestation
in the general area. This area has been slowly drying out over time.
The property appears to have been "enhanced" for melaleuca more than 4-5 years ago. There are no melaJeuca in
the canopy or sub-canopy. There are also dead melaleuea stumps and piles of cut canopy and sub-canopy trees
that have been cut and treated all around the area. The enhancement of the area removing melaleuca has been very
effeeti ve. It appears that there is 0.5% or less melaJeuea in the groundcover and the area is doing well.
On the east and west sides of the Renda parcel there is active enhancement activates for metaleuca taking place.
The adjacent properties have canopy and sub canopy trees is various stages of post herbicide treatment. Overall.
the general area around Renda is undergoing a lot of changes in the vegetation due to the herbicide enhancement
treatments.
StatefFederaJ Protected Soccies Listed. The FWC list was published in November 2007 and lists 118 animals as
protected in the State of Florida and is attached as Appendix A. Based on general habitat requirements. historic
distributions and actual sightings, the FWC lists 52 animal species that may occur in Collier County. There are 51
species that are venebrates and 1 invertebrate. The 52 species are listed in Figure 4.
The FWS list is updated daily on their website. The October 2008 list totals 113 animal and plant .pecies as protected
in the State of Rorida and is attached as Appendix B. Based on general habitat requirements, historic distributions and
actual sightings, the FWS Ii.ts 19 species (19 animal. and no plants) that may occur in Collier County. Species for
Collier Co. are listed in Figure 4 also.
Site Survev Results. Figure 5 indicates the cumulative total of all species observed over 10 survey event.:;. Daily field
sheets are located in Appendix C, Overall, 15 species were noted, 14 bird species, 1 mammal and 2 reptiles. The most
frequent bird species observed was eastern blue bird with 27 ob~ervations. No listed species were observed or indicators
noted on the property.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 101 of 191
Renda Broadcasting Corp. Black & Veatch Tampa 011
PID 0040~160008. 5860 Crew!;; Rd.
Lisl,,'\! Species Wildlife SUI.'ey
08 October 2008
Page 3
Listed Soecies Results.
Gopher Frog/Rana capito: Prefers dry sandy, upland habitats adjacent to wetland areas. This type habitat is not
present onsite, or adjacent properties and no individuals were observed on site. Changes in the project property
will have no effect on this species.
Cape Sable sealiide spnrrowlAmmodramus maritimus mirabilis; Currently inhabits seasonally inundated freshwater
interior marshes within Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preservc in Monroe and Dade County. Last
documented in Collier Co. in 1979. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the property.
Florida Grasshopper sparrowlAmmodramus savannarumjIoridallus: Prefers large areas of frequently burned dry prairie
habitat, with patchy open areas sufficient for foraging. This habitat type is not present onsile and no individuals were
observed on the property. In addition, this species has not been observed since 1955 in Collier Co. Changes in the
project property will have no effect on this species.
Florida scrub jayl Aphelocoma coerulescens: Prefers low growing scrub oak plants. This habitat is not present
onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in the project property will have no effect on
this species.
LimpkinfAramus guarauna: Inhabits mangroves. freshwater marshes. swamps, springs and spring runs, and pond
and river margins. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties.
Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Florida burrowing owVAthene caniculariajloridana: Prefers habitats of high, sparsely vegetated, sandy ground.
This habitat is not present on site and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property
will have no effect on this species.
Ivory-billed woodpeckerl Campephilus principalis: This species is considered to be extinct but is still listed.
Known to prefer swampy forests, especially large bottomland river swamps of coastal plain and Mississippi Delta
and cypress swamps of Florida. This habitat is present onsite, but no individuals were observed on the properties.
Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Cuban-Isnowy plover, Charadrius alexnndrinus: Prefers dry, sandy beaches, where they nest in shallow
depressions'- usually near some vegetation or debris. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were
observed on.the properties. Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Piping ploverlCharadrius melodus: Prefers open, sandy beaches and on tidal mudflats and
sandflats alo!,g the coasts. This habitat is not present onsite and nO individuals were observed on the properties.
Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Kirtland's warbler IDendroica kirtlandii: Nests in nearly homogeneous stands of usually 30 ha or more of dense
scrubby jack pine. Florida maybe a migration stop between Michigan and the Bahamas. Individuals may flay
straight through. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes
in this property will have no effect on this species.
Little blue heronfEgretta caerulea: Feeds in shallow freshwater, brackish, and saltwater habitats. Nesting colonies
usually occur in coastal areas, but prefers foraging in freshwater lakes, marshes, swamps, and streams. Nests in a
variety of woody vegetation types, including cypress, willow, maple, black mangrove, and cabbage palm. Usually
breeds in mixed-species colonies in flooded vegetation or on islands. Nesting habitat is present onsite, but no
other nesting of other wading bird species has been observed. Because of drainage, the area dries out every year
. .
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 102 of 191
Renda Broadcasting Corp, Black & V~atch Tampa 011
PID 00405160008, 5860 C:re\I"~ Rd,
Listed Sp~ies Wildlife Survey
08 October 2008
Page 4
which removes a1l prey species. No individuals or nests were observed on the property. Changes in this property
wi1l have no effect on this species
Reddish egretlEgreua rufesce"s: Typically prefers coastal mangrove islands, or in Brazilian pepper on manmade
dredge spoil islands, near suitable foraging habitat. Generally forages in shallow waler of variable salinity. Broad.
open, marine tidal flats and shorelines with little vegetation are ideal feeding areas. Also important are salt
evaporation pools and lagoons. often located inside mangrove keys or just inside shoreline on mainland. This
habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property will
have no effecl on this species.
SnowyegretlEgretta rhu/a: Nests both inland and in coastal wetlands with nests placed in many types of woody
shrubs, especially mangroves and willows; usually over shallow waters. Almost all nesting is over shallow waters
or on islands that are separated from shoreline by extensive open water. Feeds in many types of permanently and
seasonally flooded wetlands, streams, lakes, and swamps, and in manmade impoundments and ditches. Breeding
success is tied to water-leve.l fluctuations. Preferred nesting habitat is not present onsite. Thelt: a.r:e uu
permanently inundated areas on site. Seasonally flooded areas are very short in duration. Because of drainage,
the area dries out every year which removes all prey species. No individuals or nesting were observed on the
properties. Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Tricolored heron/Egreua triculor: Most nesting colonies occur on mangrove islands or in willow thickets in fresh
water, but nesting sites include other woody thickets on islands or over standing water. Prefers coastal
environments. Feeds in a variety of permanently and seasonally flooded wetlands, mangrove swamps, tidal
creeks, ditches, and edges of ponds and lakes. Because of drainage, the area dries out every year which removes
all prey species. Preferred nesting and feeding habitat is not present onsile and no individuals were observed on
the properties. Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
White ibisl Eudocimus albus: Found in a wide variety of habitats, including freshwater and brackish marshes, salt
flats and salt marsh meadows, many types of forested wetlands, wet prairies, swales, seasonally inundated fields,
and man-made ditches. The forested wetland habitat is present onsite and targeted to be preserved and enhanccd.
Because of drainage, the area dries out every year which removes all prey species. No individuals or nests were
observed in the property. Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Peregrine falcon/Fa/co peregrinus: The Peregrine Falcon frequents open areas like marshes. fields, swamps, and
tidal areas. Since its reintroduction into the eastern United States, however, the Peregrine Falcon has colonized
many urban areas because of increased nesting sites (and nesting ledges being created on buildings). This species
is considered to be recovered and is waiting for delisling. This habitar is not present onsite and no individuals
were observed on the properties. Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Southea.I;item American kestrel/Falco spnneriusf'oulu.'1: Fonnd in open pine habitats, woodland edges, prairies,
and pastures throughout much of Florida. Nest sites are tall dead trees or utility poles generally with an
unobstructed view of surroundings. Kestrels are not known to nest in Collier County. Most individuals are
migrants from the north. No individuals or nests were observed on the properties_ Changes in this property will
have little to no effect on this species.
Florida sandhilJ crane/Grus canadensis pra/cnsis: Habitat: Prairies, freshwater marshes. and pasnlre lands.
Avoids forests and deep marshes but uses transirion zones and edges between these and prairies or pasture lands.
This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property
will have no effect on this species.
American oystercatcher/Haematopus palliates: Habitat: Coastal waters. This habitat is not present onsite and no
individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 103 of 191
Renda Bllkldc:lSling Corp, Black & V~3tch Tampa 011
PID 0040,"; 160ooR, 5860 Crews Rd.
Listed Species Wildlife Survey
08 October 2008
PageS
Bald eaglelHClliaeetus leueoeephalus: According to the FWC eagle website, the closest eagle nest (CO 023) is
2.30 miles to the north west. A map of this nest location is presented in Figure 6. he proposed project is not in the
primary or secondary zone. No individuals or nests were observed on or utilizing the property, Any proposed
changes in this property will have little to no effect on this species. On a larger scale the FWS has delisted the
Bald Eagle.
Wood stork/Myeteria Americana: Nests colonially in a variety of inundated forested wetlands, including cypress
strands and domes, mixed hardwood swamps, sloughs, and mangroves. Forages in 6-15 inches of surface water.
The preferred nesting habitat is present onsite. but the surface water does not gct very deep on the property during
the year due to the impacts of road building changing the hydrology. Because of drainage, the area dries out every
year which removes all prey species. No individuals or nests were observed on the properties. Changes in this
property will have no effect on this species.
Brown peJicanfPeleeanus ocrid.ntn/ir Habitat: Mainly coastal, feeding in shallow estuarine waters, and (less
often) far offshore. . This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties.
Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Red-cockaded woodpeckerlPicoideJ borealis: Habitat: Inhahits open, mature pine woodlands that have a
diversity of grass, forb, and shrub species. Prefers mature slash pine trees that are generally larger than 12 inches
in diameter, a wide spacing of trees, no subcanopy and relatively dry conditions. The preferred habitat is not
present onsite. No individuals were observed on the property. Again for this survey all pine trees were inspected
for nest cavitics or start holes and none were found. Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Roseate spoonbilVPlatalea ajaja (Ajaia ajaja): Habitat: Primarily nests in mixed-species colonies on coastal
mangrove islands or in Brazilian pepper on man-made dredge spnil islands near suitable foraging habitat. Does
feed in forested wetland habitats with slow moving water. Although forested wetland type habitat present,
hydrology has been so impacted it is very low quality. Because of drainage. the area dries out every year which
removes all prey species. No individuals or indications of this species were observed on the properties, Changes
in this property will have no effect on this species
Crested caracaralPolyborus plancus audubonii (Caracara eheriway): Open country. including dry prairie and
pasture lands with cabbage palm, cabbage palmflive oak hammocks, and shallow ponds and sloughs. Preferred
nest trees are cabbage palms, followed by live oaks. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were
observed on the properties. Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Everglades snail kitelRostrhamus soeiabilis plumbeus: Habitat: Large open freshwater marshes and lakes with
shallow water. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in
this property will have noetrect on this species.
Black skimmerlRynchops nilier: Habitat: Coastal waters, including beaches, bays, estuaries, sandbars, tidal creeks
(foraging), and also inland waters of large lakes, phosphate pits. and flooded agricultural fields. This habitat is not
present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties, Changes in this property will have no effect on
this species.
LeasttemfSterna (mtillarum: Habitat: Coastal areas throughout Florida, including beaches, lagoons, bays and
estuaries. Increasingly use artificial nesting sites, including gmvel rooftops, dredge spoil islands or other dredged
material deposits, construction sites, causeways, and mining lands. This habitat is not present onsite and no
individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 104 of 191
Renda Broadcasting Corp, Black & Veillch Tampa all
PID 0040516000R. 5860 Crews Rd.
Li.~l~ Species Wildlife Survey
08 October 2008
Pa.ge 6
Roseate tern/Sterna dOllga/li (Stema dougal/ii dOllga/lii): Habitat: Nest sites include bare limestone, sheJl-sand
beaches, newly deposited rock and marl fill, dredge material. and heaps of broken coral deposited by storms. This
habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property will
have no effect on this species.
Bachman's warbIer/Vennivora bachmanii: Historic records indicate the Bachman's warbler nested in low, wet
forested areas containing variable amounts of water. but usually with some water that was permanent. This
species is considered extinct in Florida. This preferred habitat is present onsite and no individuals were observed
on the properties. Changes in this property will have 00 effect on this species.
Smalltooth sawfish/Pristis peetinata: Habitat: Shallow coastal, estuarine, aod fresh waters; often in brackish
water near river mouths and large embayments, in deeper holes on bottoms of mud or muddy sand. This habitat is
not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property will have no
effect on this species.
Rivulus (mangrove rivulus)IRivu/us marmoratus: Habitat: coastal, appears to prefer red mangrove (Rhizophora
mangle). This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this
property will have no effect on this species.
Sei whalelBa/aenoptera borealis: Habitat: Pelagic. marine. Generally, in deep water; along edge of continental
shelf and in open ocean. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties.
Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Fin whale (finback whale)IBa/aenoptera physalus: Habitat: Pelagic, marine. Usually found in largest numbers
25 miles or more from shore. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the
properties, Changes in this property will have no effect on this species
North Atlantic right whale/Euba/aena glaciaUs (Ba/aena glacialis [incl. australis}): Habitat: Inhabits near shore
and offshore waters. Mainly coastal in the North Atlantic. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals
were observed on the properties. Changes in this property will have no effect on this species
Florida mastiff batlEumops glaucinus flvridalltls: Habitat: Roosts in palms and hollow trees and in buildings.
Forages high in air over natural as well as human-altered landscapes. Minimal preferred roosting habitat is
present onsite. No iodi viduals were observed on the properties or surrounding areas during surveys. Changes in
this property will have no effect 00 this species.
Humpback whalelMegaptera lIovaeang/iae: Habitat: Pelagic and coastal waters, sometimes frequenting inshore
areas such as bays. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties.
Chan~es io this property will have 00 effect on th;s species.
Caribbean monk seallMonachus tropicaUs: Habitat: Marine areas. Shallow lagoons and reefs, sandy beaches. aod
permanent islets or beaches above high tide. Mainly west coast of Florida and Caribbean. This habitat is not
present onsite aod no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property will have no effect on
this species.
Everglades minklMustela l'ison evergladensi.~: Habitat: A variety of wetland communities, including salt marsh,
freshwater marsh, cypress swamp. and hardwood swamp. The preferred habitat is onsile. However, no
individuals were observed or. iodicators of the presence was noted on the property. Changes in this property will
have no effect on this species.
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 105 of 191
Rc:nda Broadcasting Corp, Black & Veatch Tampa 01 J
PID 00405 I 6()(x)8. 5860 Crews R.d.
Listed Species Wildlife Survey
08 October 2008
P3ge 7
Sperm whalelPhyseter macrocephalus: Habitat: Pelagic, prefers deep water, sometimes around islands or in
shallow shelf waters. This habitat is not present onsitc and no individuals were observed on the properties,
Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Florida pantherlPwna (Felis) concolor coryi: Habitat: Requires extensive blocks of mostly forested communities.
The FWC panther telemetry database form 1981-2007 indicates no utilization of this property (Figure 7). From
1981 to 1995 the closest telemetry activity was 1.5 miles away. From 1996 to 2007 there has been no telemetry
activity within 2.5 miles of the site. The forested habitat panthers utilize is present onsite. No individuals or
indicators were observed on the property. Planned changes in this property should have no effect on this species.
However, this property is not in the Focus Area or Primary or Secondary Panther Habitat Zones articulated by
FWS, but it is within the area of Consultation (Figure 7).
Big Cypress fox squirreUSciurus niger avicennia: Habitat: Sandhills (high pine), pine flatwoods. and pastures and
other open, ruderal habitats with scattered pines and oaks. Depends on a variety of oak trees for seasonal food and
nest material. Longleaf pine cones and seeds are important foods. This habitat type is not plescnt onsite. due 10
little to no oak trees being present. No individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property will
have no effect on this species.
FloridafWest Indian manateelTrichechus mana/us la/irosrris (Trichechus mana/us): Habitat: Coastal waters, bays,
rivers, and (occasionally) lakes. Requires warm-water refugia such as springs or cooling effluent during cold
weather. Sheltered coves are important for feeding, resting. and calving, This habitat is not present onsite and no
individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Florida black bearlUrsus american us floridan us: Habitat: A wide variety of forested communities is needed to
support the varied seasonal diet of black bears. Forested wetlands are particularly important for diurnal cover.
This habitat is present onsite. Figure 8 indicates black bear telemetry locations form 1983-2000 as collected by
the FWC. The closest bear location was approximately I mile to the east of the property. Figure 9 indicates the
locations of nuisance issues from 1980-2006 according to the FWe. There has not been any nuisance issues on
this parcel. This is an unmanned unoccupied site that produces no waste or trash for weekly pickup, This general
area has had no nuisance call since 2005 based on data form FWe. Changes in this property will have no effect
on this species and planned activities should not generate nuisance issues,
American alligator/Alligator mississippiensis: Habitat: Most permanent bodies of fresh water, including marshes,
swamps, lakes, and rivers. Occasionally wanders into brackish and salt water but rarely remains there. Protected
classification is primarily due to similarity of appearance with the American Crocodile. This Species is
considered recovered in Florida. Habitat is not present onsite. No individuals were observed on the properties.
Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Loggerhead seatllrtlelCaretfa caret/a: Habitat: Marine coastal and oceanic waters; nest on coastal sand heaches.
This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property
will have no effect on this species.
Green seaturtlellChelonia mydas: Habitat: Marine coastal and oceanic waters; nest on coastal sand beaches. This
habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property will
have no effect on this species.
American crocodile/ICrocodylus acutus: Habitat: Coastal estuarine marshes, tidal swamps, and crecks along
edges of mainland and islands. Usually associated with mangroves. Nests on beaches. stream banks. and levees.
This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this property
will have no effect on this species.
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 106 of 191
Rend<l Brondcasling Cnrp, Black & Veatch Tampa 011
PID 00405160008, 5860 Crews Rd.
lisled Species Wildlife Survey
08 October 2008
Page 8
Leatherback seaturtlelDennochelys cor;acea: Habitat: Marine coastal and oceanic waters; nest on coastal sand
beaches. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this
property will have nO effect on this species.
Eastern indigo snakelfDrymarchon cora;.' couper;; Habitat: Broad range of habitats, from scrub and sandhill to
wet prairies and mangrove swamps. In northern part of range, often winters in gopher tortoise burrows irl sandy
uplands but forages in more hydric habitats. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed
on the property. Also, no gopher tortoise burrows were discovered. Changes in this property will have no effect
on this species
Hawksbill seaturtlellEretmochelys imbricata: Habitat: Marine coastal and oceanic waters; nest on coastal sand
beaches. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this
property will have no effect on this species.
Gopher tortoiselGopherus polyphemu<: Hahitat: Typically found in dry upland habitats, including sandhills,
scrub, xeric oak hammock, and dry pine flatwoods; also commonly uses disturbed habitats such as pastures, old
fjelds, and road shoulders. Typical habitat not present on site and area is generally to wet. No burrows or
individuals observed on site. Changes in this property will have no effect on this species.
Kemp's ridley seaturtle/lLepidochelys kempii: Habitat: Marine coastal and oceanic waters; nest on coastal sand
beaches. This hahitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties. Changes in this
property will have no effect on this species.
Florida tree snail/lLiguus fasciatus: Habitat: Tropical hardwood hammock (rockland hammock). This species
prefers smooth-barked trees. This habitat is not present onsite and no individuals were observed on the properties.
Changes in this property will have no effect on this species
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of habitat on site is 624 pine. cypress, palm. This habitat type appears to be the result of a hydrology
impacts over a long period of time, which dried the area out and allowed slash pine and melaleuca to invade in
cypress transition areas in the dry years. Melaleuca enhancement ansite has improved the vegetative associations
on site. The surrounding properties melaleuca enhancement activities that are currently ongoing are causing a lot
of changes in the vegetative structure in the general area.
The wildlife utilization of the area is primarily passerines. and raccoons. No listed species were observed utilizing
the area. The area has generally a low utilization by wildlife and is not expected to increa'\e because of its
fragmentation of habitat caused by the roads and drainage of the surrounding residential area.
This area is not expected to have a high increase in wildlife utilization in the future with or without changes to this
parcel, and a continuing problem with melaleuca. Overall, changes in this property will have little to no effect on
any wildlife in the general area including any listed species that may occasionally use the site.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 107 of 191
Rendll8roodcalOting Corp, Black & Veafch Tampa 011
PID 00405160008, 5860 Crews. Rd.
LislCd Species Wildlife Sl.ltvey
08 October 2008
PIlge9
REFERENCES
Ashton, R. E.. Jr., and P. S. Ashton. 1988a. Handbook of reptiles and amphibians of Florida, part 3: The amphibians.
Windward PubL, Inc., Miami, Florida.
_' 1988b, Handbook of reptiles and amphibians of Florida, part I: The snakes, 2nd ed. Windward Publ., Inc..
Miami, Florida.
_' 1991. Handbook of reptiles and amphibians of Florida, part 2: Lizards. turtles & crocodilians, 2nd ed. Windward
Publ., Inc., Miami, Florida.
Barbour, D. B., and S. R Humphrey. 1982. Status and habitat of the Key Largo woodrat and cotton mouse (Neotoma
floridana smalli andPeromyscus gossypinus allapatkola). J Mammal. 63:144-148,
Barnwell, M. E., P. A. Meylan, and T. Walsh. 1997. The spotted turtle (Clemmys guttata) in central Florida. Chelonian
Cons, BioI. 2:405-408.
Bartlett. R D., and P. P. Bartlett. 1999. A field guide to Florida reptiles and amphibians. Gulf Publ. Co.. Houston,
Texas.
Berner, L.. and M. L. Pescador. 1988. The mayflies of Florida. Univ. Presses of Florida, Gainesville.
Dirkenhol>, D. E, 1963. A study of the hIe history and ecology of the round-tailed muskrat (Neofiber alieni). Ecolog.
Monogr. 33:225-280.
Bortone, S. A. 1989. Notropis melanostomus, a new species of cyprinid fisb from the Blackwater- Yellow River drainage
of northwest Florida. Copeia 3:737-74I.story, habitat assessment, and systematics of the blackmouth shiner
(Notropis sp.), Blackwater
River drainage. Final Rep. Nongame Wildl. Prog.. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Comm., Tallahassee.
Bouchard, R W. ] 978. Taxonomy, ecology and phylogeny of the subgenus Depressicambarus, with the description of a
new species from Florida and redescriptions of Cambarus graysoni, Cambarus latimanus, and Cambarus striatus
(Decapoda: Cambaridae). Bull. Alabama Mus. Nat. Hist. 3:27-60.
Bowen, P. J. 2000. Demographic, distribution, and metapopulation analyses of the burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia)
in Florida. M.S. thesis, Univ. Central Florida, Orlando.
Brady, J. T., T, H. Kunz, M. D. Tuttle, and D. E. Wilson. 1982. Gray bat recovery plan. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Denver,
Colorado.
Brim Box, J.. and J. D. Williams. 2000. Unionid mollusks of the Apalachicola Basin in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia.
Bull. Alabama Mus. Nat. Hist. 21:1-143.
Brody, R. W. 1990. Status of habitat and populalions of Procambarus pictus in the North Fork of Black Creek, Clay
County, Florida. S!. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, Florida.
Brown, L. N. 1997. A guide to the mammals of the southeastern United States. Univ. Tennessee Press. Knoxville.
Brown. W. S. 1993. Biology, status. and management of the timber rattlesnake (Crotalus honidus): a guide for
conservation. Soc. Stud. Amphib. Rep!. Herp. Cire. 22.
Carle, F. L., and M. L. May. 1987. Gomphus (Phanogompbus) westfalli spec. nov, from the Gulf coast of Florida
(Anisoptera: Gomphidae). Odonatologica 16:67- 75.
Chace, F. A., Jr. 1954. Two subterranean shrimps (Decapoda: Caridea) from Florida and the West Indies, with a revised
key to the American species: J. Washington Acad. Sci. 44:318-324.
Chafin, L. 2000. Field guide to Ihe rare piants of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee.
Chase, C. A., and J. A. Gore. 1989. Snowy plover breeding distribution. Unpubl. final rept., Florida Hsh and
Wildl.Conserv. Comm., Tallahassee.
Choate, P. M. 1984. A new species of Cicindela Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) from Florida, and elevation of C,
abdominal;s scabrosa Schaupp to species level. Entomol. News 95:73-82.
Conant, R, and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America, 3rd ed.
Houghton Mifflin, Boslon.
Cox. J.. D. Inkley. and R. Kautz. 1987. Ecology and habitat protection needs of gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus)
populations found on lands slated for large-scale development in Florida. Nongame Wildlife Prog. Tech. Rep.
no. 4, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Comm., Tallahassee.
Crance, 1. H. 1986. Habitat suitability index models and inslream flow suitability curves: shOrlnose sturgeon. U. S. Fish
Wildl. Servo BioI. Rep. 82( 10.129).
Deitz, D. C.. and T. C. Hines. 1980. Alligator nesting in north-central Florida. Copeia 1980:249-258.
Delany, M. F., and C. L. Abercrombie. 1986. American alligator food habits in north-cenlral Florida. J. Wildl. Manag.
50:348-353.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 108 of 191
Renda 8roadca.'uing Corp. Black & Veatch Tampa 011
PID 00405 J 60008. 5860 Crews Rd.
Listed Species Wildlife Survey
08 OclOber 2008
P3ge 10
Delany. M. F., P.B. Walsh, B. Prunty, and D.W. Perkins. 1999. A previously unknown population of Aorid.
grasshopper sparrow on Avon Park Air Force Range. Florida Field Nat. 27(2):52-56.
Deyrup, M., and R. Franz (eds.). 1994. Rare and endangered biota of Aorida, vol. IV: Invertebrates. Univ. Press of
florida, Gainesville.
Dodd, C. K., Jr. ]988. Synopsis of the biological data on the loggerhead sea turtle Caretta caretta (Linnaeus 1758). U.S.
Fish Wild!. Servo BioI. Rep.88(]4).
Duggins, C. F.. Jr., A. A. Karlin, K. Relyea, and R. W. Yerger. 1986. Systematics of the key silverside, Menidia
conchorum, with comments on other Menidia species (Pisces: Atherinidae). Tu]ane Stud, Zool. Bot. 25(2):]33-
150.
Dunkle, S. W. 1989. Dragonllies of the "lorida Peninsula, Bermuda and the Bahamas. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville,
Aorida.
_.2000. Dragonflies through binoculars: A field guide to the dragonllies of North America. Oxford Univ. Press,
New York.
DunaJ 1999, National Geographic Sociefy field guide to the birds of North America. 3rd ed. National Geographic
Soc., Wa~hington, D.C.
Emmel, T. c.. and M. C. Minno. 1988. Habitat reqwrements and status of the endemic Schaus swallowtail in the Aorida
Keys. Final report, Aorida Game and Fresh Water Fish Connn.. Tallahassee,
Enge, K. M., M. M. Bentzien. and F. Percival. 1986. Aorida scrub lizard status survey. Tech. Rept. No. 26 to U.S. Fish
Wildl. Serv., Jacksonville End. Sp. Office, Aorida.
Ernst, C. H.. and R. W. Barbour. 1989. Snakes of eastern North America. George Mason Univ. Press, Fairfax, Virginia.
Ernst, C. H., 1. E. Lovich. and R. W. Barbour. ]994. Turtles of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Inst. Press,
Washington, D,C.
Ewert, M. A.. and D. R. Jackson. 1994. Nesting ecology of the alligator snapping turtle (Macroclemys temminckii)
along the lower Apalachicola River, Florida. Final Rep. NG89-020, Nongame Wi]dlife Prog. Florida Game and
Fresh Water Fish Comm.. Tallahassee.
Fitzpatrick, J. W.. G. E. Woolfenden, and M. T. Kopeny. 1991. Ecology and development-related habitat requirements
of the Rorida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens coerulescen~), Nongame Wildlife Prog. Tech. Rep. no. 8,
Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Comm., Tallahassee,
Florida Fish & Wi]dlife Conservation Commission. 2003. Management Plan Red.Cockade<! Woodpecker Picoides
borealis. Tallahassee, Fl. 78 pp.
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2003, October 8. Florida's Waterbird Colony Locator.
http://www.myfwc.com/waders.
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2006. Eagle nest locator. http://wld.fwc.state.ll.us/eagleleaglenests.
Florida Natural Areas Inventory. 1990. Guide to the natural communities of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory
and Florida Dept. Natural Resources, Tallahassee.
Franz, R. 1986. The Aorida gopher frog and the Aorida pine snake as burrow associates of the gopher tortoise in
northern Aorida. Pp. 16-20 in D. R. Jackson and R. J. Bryant (eds.). The gopher tortoise and its community.
Proc. 5 th Ann. Mtg. Gopher Tortoise Council, Gainesville, Florida.
Franz, R.. and L. M. Franz. 1979. Distribution, habitat preference and status of populations of the Black Creek crayfish,
Procambarus (Ortmannicus) pictus (Decapoda: Cambaridae). Florida Sci. 42:13-17.
Franz, R., and L. L. Smith. 1999: Distribution and status of the striped m:wl and Florida gopher frog in peninsular
Florida. Final Rep. Florida Fish and Wild}' Cons. Comm., Tallahassee.
Gaby. R., M. P. McMahon, F. J. Mazzotti. W, N. Gillies, and J. R, Wilcox. 1985. Ecology and status of a population of
Crocodylus acutus (Reptilia: Crocodilidae) at a power plant site in Florida. J, Herpeto!. 19: 189-198.
Georgia Department of Natural Resources. 1999. Protected animals of Georgia. Nongame - Endangered Wildlife
Program, Wildlife Res. Div.. Georgia Dept. Nat. Res., Social Circle.
Gilbert, C. R. (ed.). 1978. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, vol. 4: Fishes. Univ. Presses of Florida. Gainesville.
_(ed.). 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, vol. IT: Fishes. Univ, Press of Aorida, Gainesville.
Glassberg, 1., M. C. Minno. and J. V. Calhoun. 2000. Butterflies through binoculars: a field, finding. and gardening
guide to butter!1ies in florida. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
Gordon, M. E., and W. R. Hoeh. 1993. Anodonta heardi,a new species of freshwater mussel (Bivalvla:Unionidae) from
the Apalachicola River system of the southeastern United States. Walkerana 7:265-273.
Gore. J. A., and M. 1. Kinnison. 1991. Hatching success in roof and ground colonies of least terns. The Condor 93:759-
762.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 109 of 191
Renda Broadcasting Corp. Black & Veatch Tampa 011
PID 0040~160008, ~860 Crews Rd.
Listed Species Wildlife SUI'\'ey
08 October 2008
Page II
Guillory, V. 1979. Lake Eustis puplish investigations. Rorida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission 1977-1979 Fioal
Report: Study I-N. Tallahassee.
Guillory, V.. and W. E. Johnson. 1986. Habitat, conservation status, and zoogeography of the cyprinodont fish,
Cyprinodon variegatus hubbsi (Carr). The Southwestern Nat. 31(1):95-100.
Hall, E. R. 1981. Mammals of North America. 2 nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Harvey. M. J. 1992. Bats of the eastern United States. Arkansas Game and Fish Comm., Little Rock.
Hersh, S.L. 1981. Ecology of the Key Largo woodrat (Neostoma noridana small i). J. Mammal. 62:201-206.
Hipes, D., D. R. Jackson, K. NeSmith, D. Printiss and K. Brandt. 200t. Field guide to the rare animals of Rarida.
Rorida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee.
Hirth, H. F. 1971. Synopsis of the biological data on the green turtle Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus) 1758. FAO Fish.
Synopsis 85.
Hobbs, H. H., Jr. 1942. The crayfishes of Florida. Univ. Florida Publ.. BioI. Sci. Ser, 3(2):1-179.
Hoehn, T. S. 1998. Rare and imperiled fish species of Rorida: a watershed perspectivc. Office Envir. Serv., Florida
Game and Fresh Water Fish Comm., Tallahassee.
Hovis, J. A.. and M. S. Robson. 1989. Breeding status and distribution of the least tern in the Rorida Keys. Florida Field
Nat. 17(3):61-66.
Humphrey, S. R. (ed.). 1992. Rare and cndangered biota of Florida, vol. I: Mammals. Vniv. Press of Rorida, Gainesville
Humphrey, S. R. 1988. Density estimates of the endangered Key Largo woodra! and cotton mouse (Neotoma floridana
smalli and Peromyscus gossypinus allapaticola) using the nested-grid approach. J. Mammal. 69(3):524-531.
Humphrey, S. R., and H. W. Selzer. 1989. Geographic variation and taxonomic revision of mink (Mustela vison) in
Rorida. J. Mammal. 17:382-392.
Hurst, H. N.. G. Bass, and C. Hubbs. 1975. The biology of the Guadalupe, Suwannee, and redeye basses. Pp. 47.53 in
R. H. Stroud and H. Clepper (eds.).
Black bass biology and management. Sport Fishing Institute,Washington, D.C. Jackson, D. R., and R. Franz. 1999.
Survey for the fire. back crayfish in the Apalachicola ravine system, northern Rorida. Final report to The Nature
Conservancy. Rorida Natural Areas Inveatory, Tallahassee.
Jackson. D. R.. and E, G. Milstrey, 1989, The fauna of gopher tortoise burrows. Pp. 86-98 in 1. E. Diemer, D. R.
Jackson, J. L. Landers, 1. N. Layne, and D. A. Wood, eds. Gopher Tortoise Relocation Symposium
Proceedings. Nongame Wildl. Program Tech. Rep. no. 5. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Comm.,
Tallahassee.
Jackson. D. R.. and R. N. Walker. 1997. Reproduction in the Suwannee cooter. Pseudemys conciana suwanniensis.
Bull. Florida Mus. Nat. Hist. 41:69-167.
Jackson. J, F. 1973. Distribution and population phenetics of the Florida scrub lizard. Sceloporus woodi. Copeia
1973:746-761.
Jackson. J. F., and S. R. Telford, 1974. Reproductive ecolugy of the Rorida scrub lizard, Sceloporus woodi. Copeia
1974:689-694.
James, F. C. 1991. Signs of trouble in the larg,s! remaining population ofred-cockaded woodpeckers. Auk 108:419-
423.
Juhnson, S. A. 2001. Autecology of the striped newt (Nutophthalmus pcrstriatus): life-history, upland-hahitat use,
paedomorphosis, and conservation genetics. Ph.D. diss.. Univ. Florida, Gainesville.
Kale, H. W., II. (cd.). 1978. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. 2. Birds. Univ. Presses of Florida, Gainesville.
Kale, H. W., II., B. Pranty. B. Stith. and W. Biggs. 1992. An atlas of Florida's breeding birds. Final Rep.
Nongame Wildlife Prog., florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Comm., Tallahassee.
Keppner, E. J.. and L. A. Keppner. 2000. A preliminary search for the Panama City crayfish. Procambarus
(Leconticambarus) econfinae. Hobbs, 1942, in Bay Cuunty, Rorida. Report to U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Panama
City, florida.
Knisley, C. B., and J. M. Hill. 1994. Studies of tile Rurida Highlands tiger beetle. Cicindela highlandensis: distribution,
abundance, habitat characteristics and biology. Report to V.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Jacksonville, Rorida.
_' 1996. The Rorida Highlands tiger beetle, Cicindela highlandensis: habitat requirements, remaining range, life
history, and management. Final Rep. Florida Nongame Wildlife Prog. NG91-012, Florida Game and Fresh
Water Fish Comm.. Tallahassee.
Kulhavcy, D. L., R. G. Hooper, and R. Costa (cds.). 1995. Red-cockaded woodpecker: recovery, ecology. and
management. Center for Applied Studies in I-''''orests, CoJlege of Furcstry, Stephen F. Austin State Univ.,
Nacogdoches. Texas.
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 110 of 191
Renda Broadcasting Corp, Black & Veatch Tampa OJ]
PID 00405160008,5860 Crews Rd.
U~ted Specie!! Wildlife Survey
OR October 2008
P:\ge ]2
Kushlan, 1. A. 1974. Observations on the role of the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) in the southern
Florida wetlands. Copeia 1974:993-996.
_, and F. J. Mazzoui. 1989. Population biology of the American crocodile. 1. Herpetol. 23:7-21.
Lazell, 1. D.,lr. 1989. Wildlife of the Florida Keys: a natural history. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Layne, J. N. 1990, The Florida mouse. pp. 1-21 in C, K. Dodd, lr., R. E. Ashton, Jr.. R. Franz, and E. Wester (eds.).
Burrow Associates of the Gopher Tortoise. Proc. 8 th Ann. Mtg. Gopher Tortoise Council. Florids Mus. Nat.
Hist., Gainesville.
Loftin, R. W. 1992. Use of nest boxes by the Florida kestrel. Florida Field Nat20(3):57-64,
McMillian, M. 2001. Florida Important Bird NeIlS Program, site nomination fonn -Lake Istokpog., Audubon of Florida,
Tampa Bay Sanctuaries.
McNair. D. B., and 1. A. Gore. 1999. Recent breeding status of royal .nd sandwich terns in northwest Florid.. Florida
Field Nat. 27(3):117-120.
Maehr. D. S. 1987. F10rids panther movements, social organization, and habitat utilization. E-I-Il annual perfonnance
report. Florids Fish and Wildl. Cons. Comm., Tall.hllSsee.
Martin, W. H., and D. B. Means. 1998. Distribution and habitat relationships of the eastern diamondback rattlesnake
(Crotalus adamanteus). Herpetological Nat. Hist. 7:9-34.
Means, D. B. 1975, Competitive exclusion along a habitat gradient between two species of salamanders (Desmognathus)
in western F1orids. J. Biogeog. 2:253- 263.
Means, D. B., and A. A. Karlan, 1989. A new species of Desmognathus from the eastern Gulf Coastal Plain.
Herpetologica 45:37-46.
Means, D. B.. and C. J. Longden. 1970. Observations on the occurrence of Desmognathus monticola in Florida.
Herpetologica 26:396-399.
_' 1976. Aspects of the biology and zoogeography of the pine barrens tree frog, Hyl. andersoni!. in northern
Florids. Herpetologica 32:117.130.
Means, D. B., and P. E. Moler. 1979. The pine barrens treefrog: lire, seepage bogs, and management implications. Pp.
77-83 in R. R. Odom and L Landen; (eds.). Proc. rare and endangered wildlife symposium. Georgia Dept. Nat.
Res., Game and Fish Div, Tech. Bull. WL-4.
Meylan, A. B. 1999. Status of the hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) in the Caribbean region. Chelonian Cons.
BioI. 3:177-184.
_, and M. Donnelly. 1999. Statusjuslification for listing the hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbrieata).._ Critically
Endangered on the 19961UCN Red List of Threatened Animals. Chelonian Cons. BioI. 3:200-224.
Mettee, M, F., P. E, O'Neil, and J. M. Pierson. 1996. Fishes of Alabama and the Mobile Basin. Oxmoor House, InC.,
Birmingham, Alabama.
Minno. M. c., and D. Pierce. 1999, Florida butterfly gardening: A complete guide to attracting, identifying, and
enjoying buttertlies of the lower south. Univ. Press of Florida, Gainesville.
Mitchell, 1. C. 1977. Geographic variation of Elaphe guttata (Reptilia: Serpentes) in the Atlantic coostal plain. Copeia
1977:33-41.
Moler, P. E. 1981. Notes on Hyla andersonii in Florida and Alabama. J. Herpeto!. 15:441-444.
_.1985. A new species of frog (Ranidae: Rana) from northwestern Florids. Copeia 1985:379-383.
~(ed.). 1992. Rare and endsngered biota of Florida, vol. ill: Amphibians and reptiles. Univ. Press of Florida,
Gainesville.
____' 1996. Alligator snapping turtle: distribution and relative abundance. Final report 7544. Florida Game and Fresh
Water Fish Comm., Tallahassee.
Mount, R. H. 1975. The reptiles and amphibians of Alabama. Auburn Univ. Agric. Exp. St.1tion, Auburn, Alabama.
Myers, R. L., and J. J. Ewel (cds.) 1990. Ecosystems of Florida. Unlv. Central Florida Press, Orlando.
NatureServe. 2006. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 5.0. NatureServe,
Arlington, Virginia. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer.
Neill, W. T. 1971. The last of lhe ruling reptiles: alligators. crocodiles, and their kin. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1998, A field guide to freshwater fishes; North America north of Mexico, 2nd ed.
Houghton Mifflin, RoSlon.
Paul, R. T. 1991. Status report- Egrella rufescens (Gmelin) reddish egret. U.S. fish Wild!. Serv., Houston, Texas.
_' and A. F. Schnapf. 2000. Florida Important Bird Areas Program. site nomina-tion form - Passage Key National
Wildlife Refuge. AlIduoon of Florida. Tampa Bay Sanctuaries.
Pennak, R. W. 1978. Fresh-water invertebrates of the United States. 2nd ed, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Agenda Item No, 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 111 of 191
Rend.1 Broadcasting Corp, Black &. Ve.luch Tampa 011
Pro 00405 J 60008. SS60 Crew!> Rd.
Lisl~ Specie.~ Wildlife Survey
08 Oclober 2008
Page 13
Peterson, R.T. 1998. Peterson field guide to eastern birds. 4th ed. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Pelranka, J. W. J 998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, D.C.
Pilsbry, H. A. 1946. Land Mollusca of North America, Vol. 2, part 1. Monogroph of the Academy of Natural Sciences,
Philadelphia.
Pimm. S. (ed.). 2000. The 2000 Cape Sable sparrow annual report. Accessed 2001 May 8.
Poole, A., and F. Gill (eds.). 1992-2000. The birds of North America. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.
and The American Ornithologists' Union. Washington. D.C.
Post, W.. and J. S. Greenlaw. 2000. The present and future of the Cape Sable seaside sparrow. Florida Field Nat.
28(3):93-110.
Pranty, B. 1996, A birder's guide to Florida. American Birding Association, Inc., Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Printiss, D. J., and D. L. Hipes. 1999. Rare amphibian and reptile survey of Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. Final report
to U.S. Dept. of Defense. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee.
Pritchard, P. C. H. 1989. The alligator snapping turtle: biology and conservation. Milwaukee Publ. Mus., Milwaukee,
Wisconsin.
Quay. T. L., J. B. Funderburg, Jr., D. S. Lee, E. F. Potter, and C. S. Robbins (eds.). 1983. The seaside SpllI1'OW, its
biology lffid management. Dec. Papers, North arolina BioI. Surv. North Carolina State Mus. Nat. Hist.. Raleigh.
Relyea, K., and B. Sutton. 1975. A new lrogJobitic crayfish of the genus Procambaros from Florida. (Decapoda:
Astacidae). Tullffie Stud. ZooJ. Bot. 19(1-2):8-16.
Rice, D. W. 1957. Life history and ecology of Myotis auslroriparius in Florida. J. Mammal. 38: 15-32.
Robbins. C. S., B. Bruun, and H. S. 2im. 2001. Birds of North America: a guide to field identification. St. Martin's
Press, New York.
Rodgers, J. A.. and H. T. Smith. 1995. Set.back distances to protect nesting bird colonies from human disturbance in
Florida. Conserv. BioI. 9:89-99.
Rodgers, 1. A.. Jr., H. W. Kale n. and H. T. Smith (eds.). 1996. Rare and endangered biota of Florida, vol. V: Birds.
Univ. Press of Ronda, Gainesville.
Robertson, W. B., Jr., and G. E. Woolfenden. 1992. Florida bird species: lffi annotated list. Florida Omithol. Soc. Spec.
Pub. no. 6: ix + 260.
Roosenburg, W. M. 2000. Impact of a hycatch reduction device on diamondback terrapin and blue cmb capture in crob
pol'. Ecol. Applic. 10:882-889.
Ross, J. P., S. Beavers, D. Mundell, and M. Airth-Kindree. 1989. The status of Kemp's ridley. Center Marine Conserv.,
Washington, D.C.
Runde, D.. J. Gore, J. Hovis, M. Robson, and P. Southall. 1991. Florida atlas of breeding sites for herons and their
allies: update 1986 - 1989. Nongame Wildlife Program Tech. Rep. no. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Comm., Tallahassee.
Semlitsch, R. D. 1983. Structure and dynamics of two breeding populations of the eastern tiger salamander, Ambystoma
tigrinum. Copeia 1983:608-616.
Shealy, R, M. 1976. The natural history of the Alabama map. turtle, Graptemys pulchra Baur, in Alabama. Bull. Florida
State Mus., BioI. Sci. 21 :47-11.
Shriver. G. W., P. D. Vickery, and S. A. Hedges. 1996. Effects of summer bums on Florida grasshopper sparrows.
Florida Field Nat. 24(3):68-73.
Sibley, D. A. 2000. The Sibley guide to birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
Spotila, J. R.. A. E. Dunham, A. J. Leslie, A. C. Steyennark, P. T. Plotkin, and F. V. Paladino. 1996. Worldwide
population decline ofDermochelys coriacea: arc leatherback turtles going extinct? Chelonian Cons. BiuI.
2:209-222.
Sprandel, G. L.. J. A. Gore, and D. T. Cobb. 1997. Winter shorebird survey. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Comm.
Final Perf. Rep. Tallahassee.
Stevenson. H. M. 1970. Occurrence of the carpenter frog in Florida. Quart. J, Florida Acad. Sci. 32:233-235.
_, and B. H. Anderson. 1994. The birdlife of Florida. Univ. Press of Florida, Gainesville. Stys, B. 1993. Ecology
and habitat protecLion needs of the southeMtern American kestrel (Falco sparvcrius paulus) on large~scale
development sites in Florida. Nongame Wildl. Prog. Tech. Rep. no. 13. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Conun., Tallahassee.
Telford, S. R. 1959. A study of the sand skink, Neoseps reynolds;, Copela 1959: 100- 119.
Tenant. A. 1997. A lield guide 10 snakes of Horida. Gulf Publ. Co., Houston, Texas.
Agenda Ilem No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 112 of 191
Renda aroadcasling Corp, BlacK & Vc,llch Tampa all
Pro 00405160008, 51160 Crews Rd.
Usled Species Wildlife Survey
08 Oclo~r 2008
Page 14
Timmerman, W. W. 1989. Home range. habitat use and behavior of the eastern diamondback rattlesnake. M. S. thesis,
Univ, Florida, Gainesville.
Thaxton, J. E., and T. M, Hingtgen. 19%. Effects of suburbanization and habitat fragmentalion on Florida scrub-jay
dispersal. Florida Field Nat. 24(2):25-37.
Toland, B. 1999a. Nesting success and productivity of Florida sandhill cranes on natural and developed sites in
southeastern Florida. Florida Field Nat. 27(1):10- 13.
_" 1999b. Nest site characteristics, breeding phenology, and nesting success of American oystercatchers in Indian
River County, Florida. Florida Field Nat. 27(3):112-116.
Tuberville, T D.. 1. R. Bodie, J. B. Jensen, L. LaClaire, and J, W. Gibbons. 2000. Apparent decline of the southern hog-
nosed snake, Heterodon simus. J. Elisha Mitchell Soc. 116: 19-40.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1982_ Stock Island tree snail recovery plan. U.S_ Fish Wildl. Serv., Atlanta, Georgia.
~. 1984. American crocodile recovery plan (revised)_ U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv.. Atlanta, Georgia.
~. 1987. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; proposed threatened status for two Florida li7.aros. Fed.
Reg. 52(13):2242-2246.
1998.. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 9O-day finding for a petition to delist the Squirrel
ChilTUley Cave shrimp. Ped. Reg. 63:67618-67619.
I 998b, Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of endangered status for five freshwater
mussels and threatened status for two freshwater mU~5els from the eastern Gulf Slope drainages of Alabama.
Florida, and Georgia. Fed. Reg. 63(50):12664-12687.
_' 1998c. Okaloosa darter (Elheostoma okaloosae) recovery plan (revised). U.S. Fish Wildl. Servo Atlanta, Georgia.
1999. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; final rule to list the flatwoods salamander as a threatened
species. Fed. Reg. 64:15691-15704.
1999_ South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan U.S. Fish Wild!. Serv.. Atlanta, Georgia. 2172 pp.
_.2000. Candidate and listing priority assignment fonn: Cicindela highlandensis.
_.2006_ U.S_ Fish & Wildlife Service The Endangered Species Program [web applicat;on]. US Fish & Wildlife
Service. Washington, D.C. htlp:/Iwww.fws_gov/endangered
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission. 1995.Gulf Sturgeon Recovery Plan.
Atlanta, Georgia.
Walls, J. G. 1976. Fishes of the nonhern Gulf of Mexico. T. F. H_ Publications.lnc_. Ltd., Hong Kong.
\Vltilaker. J. O. 1996. National Audubon Society field guide to Nonh American mammals. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
Williams, J. D., and G. H. Burgess. 1999. A new species of bass, Micropterus cataraclae (Teleostei: Centrarchidae),
from the Apalachicola River basin in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia_ BulL Florida Mus. Nat. Hist. 42(2):81-
114.
Witzell. W_ N. 1983, Synopsis of the biological data on the hawksbill tunle Erelmochelys imbricata (Linnaeus, 1766).
FAa Fish. Synopsis 137.
Wood, P. B., M. L. Hoffman, M, W. Collopy, and J. M. Schaefer. 1988. SoulheaSlern American kestrel (Falco
sparverius paulus) natural history, life requirements, and habitat protection guidelines. Final report to Office of
Envir. Services. Florida Game and Fresh Waler Fish Comm.. Tallahassee.
Woods, C. A., W, Post, and C. W_ Kilpatrick. 1982. Microtus pennsylvanicus (Rodentia; Muridae) in Florida: a
Pleistocene relict. in a coastal saltmarsh. Bull. Ronda State Mus. BioI. Sci. 28:25-52.
Wooley, C. M., and E. J, Crateau. 1985. Movement, microhabitat, exploitation. and managemeOl of Gulf of Mexico
sturgeon. Apalachicola River, Florida. Nonh American J. Fisheries Manag. 5:590-605_
Wunderlin. R.P. 1998. Guide to the vascular plants of Florida. University Presses of
Florida. Gainesville. Aorida
Zambrano, R., M. S. Robson, D. Y. ChlUlJetzky, and H. T. Smith. 1997. Distrihution and status of leasl tern nesting
colonies in southeast Florida. Florida Field Nat. 25(3):85-91.
Zambrano. R_. R_, H. T. Smith, and M_ Robson. 2000. Summary of breeding roseate terns in Ihe Florida Keys: 1974-
1998, florida Field Nat. 28(2):64-68,
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 113 of 191
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
~~~
COLLIER COUNTY, FL
5 0
~-
5
10
15 Miles
,
+
,
Figure 1. Project Location Map;
Ramsev Inc.
Envlronmen"tal Consulting
2631 4th St. NW
~tl":14.';~6r120
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011,5860 Crews Roed, PID 00405160008,
Sec 08, Twn 50, RDe 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 114 of 191
Figure 2. Project Location Detail Map;
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011,5860 Crews Road, PID 00405160008,
Sec 08, Twn 50, Rge 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
Ramsev Inc.
Environmenl:al Consulting
2631 4th St. NW
~~l.ll~.~~~4120
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 115 of 191
FLUCFCS HABITAT MAP & WILDLIFE
SURVEY ROUTES 330FT
624
PINE CYPRESS PALM
DEP/SFWMD JURIS. WETLAND
USACOE JURIS. WETLAND
#1 3.73 AC
#2 0.06 AC
TOTAL 3.79 AC
III 740310
DISTURBED LAND I
GRASS PRAIRIE
DI!PISFWMD UPLAND
USACOE UPLAND
#30.15 AC
~
O 7408212
DISTURBED LAND I
COMMUNICATION TOWERS
DEPISFWMD UPLAND
USACOE UPLAND
#4 0.38 AC
~ 7408145
I:::.::;J DISTURBED LAND I
ACCESS DRIVEWAY
DEP/SFWMD UPLAND
USACOE UPLAND
#5 0.22 AC
419
~ OTHER PINE
~ DEPISFWMD UPLAND
USACOE JURIS. WETLAND
#6 0.15 AC
#7 0.08 AC
TOTAL 0.23 AC
. BUILDING
. ELECTIRICAL UTILITY
. TOWER
,
, SURVEY TRANSECT
,
::..
x
l-
II.
Cl
l"I
II)
-~---~-_._~----~_._CREWS ROAD ROW
N
+,
Figure 3. FLUCFCS habitat and wildlife survey routes map.
Ramsev Inc.
Environmen"tal Consulting
2631 4th St. NW
~11"G:4!'-.~6~4120
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011, 5860 Crews Road, PID 00405160008,
Sec OS, Twn 50, Rge 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
I
j
r
I
r
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 116 of 191
LIST OF USFWS AND FWC PROTECTED SPECIES
FOR COLLIER CO., FL. AS OF 10/08/08
f,~-:~'P~~,--~~:s::,::;':;;*;:,:::'"-'~~~~ ~i--" -~-
IlrJllin ,Ir""''','y""m,,,,,, ,~SC(tl
Alhe...,'/m"-"I"",, (;lth....
Fl.>rdobwmwil1l'''w] n,";r"i"""jl"rirl<'~,,)
,..,"Y.I>Ul<d....,"..lI"_.d'er C,>'"~phil".'I"Jt,I:f!>"li~
S'_~~~.f~">__--0'!'.',i/,.;".r'!l!.~,,~,~~~_ _,,__
P......P~ Ch"..."I,ilt.' "'MI""
k....nd.....-.uhl,r ~..Jmrr"t'"/tln<iri
Wtk h~ mnn ERr."" (',,..,,,1,,,
....xi..hclfl'f j','"Il11n,juu",
.m,,?t,,"l F.,~It"t^"kl sse/I)
n.lIk>n:dlleron €,,..,,,,'rirll/,,, .~:.(l,~_,__
w'*~-'- --i"ohrllftu.rnib....- t;SC(21
P;;~flk'oll --~~.--"--E"--.~".
Sool!ll:lollltm "..........nn .~<'T':"! ."Q!"",:p",.,'.n...'}",~.I."
Hribo ..n.1hilkn.nc C;"", ",~"tk",i., {'mulL'!.l
^m:rCinoY'=:W:her Hn_t>If>r>utf'l'iI""U.f
bUleMg", }kJl'''rn".,wUl<JCtrh,r/",
W(lOllil<:lIt MVCfni"arnt".."""
Drowl;P;,~- ,U__ P;w<nh~:i",'cldiN'~I;S'-
rNi.cod'_1Oo'OO<lp.d,... P"'r>od..,/X.,.."U_.
rMelllei.p<'IOlJb1ll PI",allttajaJII(Ajtt;ttamja)
Pttlybf.....' p/t>"'..... uwiubm.i,
(Car,,,-,,,md''''''''''vJ
E~~k:.lo:- Hmu/""'tlL'_'f1fiilbih..plwnl...tx
"~k~~ RvIlC'Itn""ni,,,.
~ -Sl~"'''an---;;j/ttn''''-
UJPHlllIANS
j!I",h.rfms
!~P~--,~
("Jll' S~"Io'.~"Ir~.m'....
~~~
n""lmo""lwurblcr
"'"
umlmoll>..wIiIJl
,;...,u,.1m:lflli'K''''''''''''')
,\-IAMMAL.S
~!I_~C""~.-!..._
Htt"",."p'-'"
A......",j''''",,,'...a''''''',,,,,.,,,,,;,,I,,
S'<'''M Jr'''ltJlIi (~'~,."n 4a"8,./I11
d""'rlllii)
v,nnnm/'fl/>o.-!''''WlI'
hi<li"pu.i1tma
NnrtIIAtiaJIIc~w/"U
H>ndon..>li!rb.ot
"'~.cl;\lIl..lI:
.!:.."-'!>!'e~lllllmnl:,""'J__
.t.,,!,r~JTidl.___
'""nnwholo
Fl<xi<Lopltllla
B'llrJ1'l'l'..klI"l\lJfe1
'~Iwholt: SIlIr.map",,,, Ix>roo/i.,
...wlwil:(tdi"d;,........)'.~&'w,."op;;mph)'..tJl"-,
EJrbtlJst.""IIItJ'.'all'lllrrlr,.....
t/(ll'itth.filorlu"-",,,lirjl
E"'""''-'8Ia",'in~..jlMI.'m''.
MCf.:"'''Crll"vvtt'''~8IJo.
MU'<I,d''''''lvp,rtrit,
-~/(t~'~-~t;ii",jr/f'i,l
-----;:i;",,~;;;;;;;;;;:;.<'I'''IMIIL. - .
P"",i1 (Fti"'J HJI1ct>l"'r",,'1
S"'-..1I11 "'I'" "".'''''''~l
r"rllt'<'Il""",,,,,,,,,,,'/r,I;m.<I";',
fuolnlWeMln<.lio.nrrllRUec iTn,"hcclllL''''"""",-,1
H"iJ.hhclbelr Un..""",..,.ic"""..{/m;4"nu,'
.!~LFS-~=--:--==--=~~'.--'
...n.......ldlotiptor
"~rMad"'"nm
jl1een""IUrti!
Nrrn:an~"'lCL>d""
lr~~~~~_'f'.n,,:::!"
~~~.:~=~" --
~~'I'ml"""''''~
K~IIll\r-tJrr"'U"u,
rN\'fJl.TEBR^T~
MOI.l..t18KS
J'I..ANTS
(NO,,~L_
Alii~tlI,,, m,~.i<Jj,."'~tui'
('''''''ML'<'rt/rD
(h,'i,,,,iu"'l-d<ll
'>~u"_\'fQ,":~"""
DUlGNATD ~"T\I.
':1iiGi '--i*-
.... ...
-,se!I.I)
E
n--
E
"
:10
; ~5C(l)
I,
- '--r;- -"---E
L
,
,~sc (I)
Project: RENDA BROADCASTING CORP, BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 0111
Figure 4. List of USFWS and FWC protected species for Collier Co., Fl.
Ramsey Ioe.
EnvironmentalCoJ1!iullil'l!;
26JI4"'SI,NW
N;tplr~, FT. 11120
LW,564.I66U
RENDA, BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011, 5860 Crews Road, PID
00405160008, See 08, Twn 50, Rge 26, totaling appro.. 4.77 aCfes.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 117 of 191
PROTECTED SPECIESIWILDLIFE FIELD SURVEY SHEET
CUMLATIVE TOTALS
PROJECT:
COUNTY:
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY FIELD SHEETS
BLACK:& VEATCH TAMPA 011
COLLIER
DATE:
OBSERVER:
TIME START:
TIIME END:
WIND:
TEMP:
RAIN:
CLOUD COV:
WATER:
COMMENTS:
09124-10104/2008 ALL SURVEYS
AM & PM TOTAL COUNT
MICHAEL R. RAMSEY
0630 AM
1945 PM
0-15
69-83 F
NONE
10-80 %
BIRDS
RED SHOULDERED HAWK
BLUEJAY
CARDINAL
PILEA TED WOODPECKER
CAT BIRD
EASTERN BLUEBIRD
GREAT EGRET
MOCKING BIRD
HAIRY WOODPECKER
RED BELLIED WOODPECKER
MOURNING DOVE
VULTURE BLACK
MAMMALS
RACCOON
REPTILE
SLENDER GLASS LIZARD
BLACK RATE SNAKE
TOTAL
COUNT
1
14
7
11
2
27
1
23
3
15
15
2
4
Project: RENDA BROADCASTING CORP, BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 0111
Figure 5. Cumulative totals for Protected Species I Wildlife Survey.
Daily field sheets in Appendix C.
RENDA. BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011,5860 Crews Road, PID
00405160008, See 08, Two 50, Rge 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
Ramsey Inc.
EnvironmenU!l Consulting
2631 411> St. NW
Naple!>, FL 34120
239.564,1660
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Pa e 118 of 191
EAGLE NEST MAP
OCTOBER 2008
~
. 2008 EAGLE Nest Loestiona Collier
_ R...de Percel
1\/ Roed.
<:
\.
PROJECT: BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011
NDA ADCA RP.
Figure 6. Location of Eallles Nesta in Coller Co. .s of Oetob.... 2008.;
sourea FWC aagle webs Ita.
Ramsev Inc.
Envlronmedlal Consulting
2631 4th at. NW
~fr!U1~~6r120
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011, 5860 Crews Road, PID 00405160008,
Sac 08, Twn 50, Rge 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
1
PANTHER TELEMETRY 1981.2007
/\I Roads
. Panther telemetry data 1981 2002
. Panther telemetry data 2003 2006
. Panther telemetry data 2007
_ RENDA PARCEL
'Y.. Panther Habitat Foeus Area 2006 Dee
, , ~ ,'Original Panther Consultation Area
~,~, .... Panther secondary zone
_ Panther primary zone
+
Figure 7 Panther telemetry form 1981-2007 In Colier Co. 80urce FWe.
Ramsev Inc.
Envlronmelital Consulting
2631 4th at. NW
~1.1,t.\~'&a.r120
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011, 5860 Crews Road, PID 00405160008,
Sec 08, Twn 50, Rge 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
Agenda Item No, 7A
April 13, 2010
P 1 9
.
.
. Black bear telem fl1983 2000
_ RENDA PARCEL
/'V ROADS
Figure B. Black Bear Telemetry In Colier Co. 1983-2000. Source FWC.
Ramsev Inc.
Environmental Consulting
2631 4th at. NW
~11":~\6r'120
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011,5860 Crews Road, PIP 00405160008,
See 08, Twn 50, Rge 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
BEAR NUSIANCE LOCATIONS 1980-2006
'~ 1lliill
.
.
.
. Bear_nuisance_1980-2006
_ RENDA PARCEL
/\/ ROADS
+.
PROJECT: BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011
E A A ING
Figure 9. Bleck B.er Nuslence Locetlons In Coller Co. 1980.2006.
Source FWC.
Ramsev Inc.
Envlronm.ntel Consulting
2631 4th St. NW
~l't"U1.~~6.f4120
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011, 5860 Cr_s Roed, PID 00405160008,
See 08, Twn 50, Kg. 26, totellng epprox. 4.77 ecres.
~~----,._._.~,_.,~.._-~-
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Pa\l.e;.122 of 191
APPENDIA A.
FLORIDA'S ENDANGERED SPECIES,
THREATENED SPECIES, AND SPECIES
OF SPECIAL CONCERN
.,
November 2007
FLORlOA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERY ATION COMMISSION
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 123 of 191
APPENDIX A.
CONTENTS
PREFACE.....,.............,...................................................................................................... ji
NUMERICAL SUMMARY OF SPECIES LISTED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AS ENDANGERED, THREATENED, OR SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN .... I
OFFICIAL LISTS ......................................................................,................................ I
FISH ............................................................................ ..................., '............. ................. 2
AMPlliBIANS........................................,..........,...............................,...........................2
REPTILES.................,.............................................................. ............................ ......... 2
BIRDS ................................................. ............. ...................,...... ................,................... 3
MAMMALS......,.........................................................................................,..................4
INVERTEBRATES ...,...................................................,............,................................. 6
CORALS .................................................................,.............................................. ....6
CRUSTACEANS,......................................................................................................6
INSECTS .............................................................................................. ..................... 6
MOLLVSKS.............................................................................................................. 6
KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTATIONS........................................................ 7
Agenda Item No.7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 124 of 191
APPENDIX A.
PREFACE
This document consolidates the otlicial state of Florida list of endangered species, threatened
species, and species of special concern. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FWC) maintains the state list of animals designated as endangered, threatened, or
species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A-27.004, and 68A-27.005,
respectively, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) !lttp://fac.dos,state.ll.usl. The state lists of
plants, which are designated endangered, threatened, and commercially exploited, are
administered and maintained by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
(DOACS) via Chapter 5B-40, F.A.C. This list of plants can be obtained at http://www./l-
<lorcom/torest mana~cment/rlant conserve list.html. The federal agencies that share the
authority to list species as Endangered and Threatened are the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration-National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA-NMFS) and U. S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The NOA.A-NMFS is responsible for listing most marine
species. The federal list of animals and plants is administered by the USFWS, and this list is
published in 50 CFR 17 (animals) and 50 CFR 23 (plants). Additional infonnation regarding
federal listings can be located at the following websites; NOAA-NMFS
http://www.l1l11fs.noaa.govandUSFWS-hllP:!/endan~ercd.fws.gov/wildlite.html#Specics.
Please note that while the FWC has published a consolidated list of state and federally listed
species in the past, we now only publish a list of species listed within the state of Florida. This
list will be maintained and available at our agency website: http://www.mvfwc.com. Lists of
federally listed species can still be viewed at the USFWS and NOAA-NMFS websites mentioned
above. It is our intent by providing the list in this manner that we wiil be able to maintain a
current list that is more readily available to the public. I would like to thank the following
people who assisted in revising this list; Tom Logan, Jeff Gore, Paul Vincent, Paul Moler,
George Wallace, Jim Rodgers, Karl Miller, Ted Hoehn, Darreil Scovell, Gray Bass, Kelly
Donnelly, Elsa Haubold, Kipp Frohlich, Bill Brooks and the USFWS staff. Special appreciation
is expressed to Ms. Angela T. Williams, Ms, Christine Yannett and Ms. Kat Diersen for their
assistance with preparation of this document.
Common and scientific oames listed first are as they appear in the me "Florida Wildlife Code Title
68A'" (F.A.C). Common and/or scientific DBmes following this and located within parentheses ( ) contain
names as used by 1.JSFWS, or other commonly used names.
Bradley J. Gruver, Ph. D
Endangered Species Coordinator
Species Conservation Planning Section
Cover Photos by FWC Staff: Key Largo Woodrat, Burrowing Owls, Okaloosa Darter, Schaus'
swallowtail butterfly, Short-tailed Snake.
ii
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 125 of 191
APPENDIX A.
NUMERICAL SUMMARY OF SPECIES LISTED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA AS ENDANGERED,
THREATENED, OR SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN
STAnIS
DESIGNA nON nSH AMPHIBIANS REPTILES BIRDS MAMMALS INVERTEBRATES TOTAl.
E 3 0 6 8 20 4 41
T 2 0 II 10 4 0 27
sse 10 5 7 18 6 4 50
TOTAL 15 5 24 36 30 8 118
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 126 of 191
APPENDIX A.
OFFICIAL LISTS
Common Name
Scientific Name
Status
FISH
Atlantic sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus ---..- sse (I)
(Gulf sturj1;eon) (Acipenser oxvrinchus desotoi)
shortnose sturgeon Acivenser breviroslrum E
shoal bass Microvlerus cataractae sse (1,2)
Suwannee bass MicroPlerus notius sse (I)
rivulus Rivulus marmoratus sse (1)
(manj1;rove rivulus) ..-------- Cyprinodon varief!atu,~ huMsi
Lake Eustis pup fish sse (1)
blackmouth shiner NOlropis melanostomus E
bluenose shiner Pleronolrovis welaka -- sse (1,2)
saltmarsh topminnow Fundulus ienkinsi u ----...,- sse (I)
key silverside Menidia conchorum T
crystal darter Crvslallaria aSTJrella T
harlequin darter ' Eiheostoma hislrio sse (I)
okaloosa darter - -'.- Elheosloma okalossae E
Southern tessellated darter Etheostoma olm~tedi sse (1)
(tessellated johnny darter) maculaliceps
key blenny Slarksia starcki sse (I)
I
AMPIDBIANS
tlatwoods salamander Ambvstoma cinl!ulalUm sse
Georgia blind salamander Haideolriton wallacei SSe( 1,2)
pine barrens treefrog Hvla andersonii sse I)
Florida bog frOg Rana okaloosae sse 2)
gopher frog Rana cavito SSe( 1,2)
..- - ---~ --
REPTILES "
,- Alligator mississippiensis sse (1,3)
American alligator -
American crocodile Crocodylus acutus E
key ringneck snake Diadophis vunctalus acricus T
Eastern indigo snake Drvmarchon corais couperi T
red rat snake Elaphe gulla1a sse! (I)
Atlantic salt marsh water snake Nerodia clarkii taeniala T
(Atlantic salt marsh snake) -----
2
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 127 of 191
Common Name
Scientific Name
APPENDIX A.
Status
Florida pine snake Piluophis melanoleucus SSC (2)
muftitus
short-tailed snake Sti/osoma extenuatum T
Florida brown snake Storeria Jekayi viC1a T1
rim rock crowned snake Tantillo oo/i1ica T
Florida ribbon snake Thamnophis sauritus sackeni T'
bluetail mole skink Eumeces eftreftius lividus T
Florida Key mole skink Eumeces eftreftius eftreftius sse (])
sand skink Neosevs revnoldsi T
Ropher tortoise Govherus volvvhemus T
Barbour's map turtle GraTJIemvs barbauri sse (12)
alliRator snappinR turtle Macroclemvs temminckii sse (I)
striped mud turtle KinosternOI1 baurii b1
Suwannee cooter Pseudemvs concinna sse (1,2)
sultvanniensis
loggerhead seaturtle Carella carella T
(Io1111erhead sea turtle)
green seaturtle Chelonia mydas E
(green sea turtle)
leatherback seaturtle ' Dermochelys coriacea E
!leatherback sea turtle)
hawksbilI seaturtle Eretmochelys imbricata E
(hawksbilI sea turtle)
Kemp's ridley seaturtle Lepidochelys kempii E
(Kemp's rid lev sea turtle)
BIRDS
pipinll plover Charadrius melodus T
snowy plover Charadrius alexandrinus T
(Cubansnowv plover)
American oystercatcher Haematovus palliatus sse (1,2)
brown pelican Pelecanus occidenta/is sse (I)
black skimmer Rvnchovs nifter sse (I)
least tern Sterna unlillarum T
roseate tern Sterna dougalli T
(Sterna douflallii douflalli1)
limpkin Aramus flUaraUfU/ sse (I)
reddish elUet Eflrella rufescens sse (1,4)
snowy ellret Eflrella thula sse (I)
little blue heron Eflrella caerulea sse (] ,4)
tricolored heron Eflretta tricolor sse (1,4)
3
T
E
T
T
sse2 1,2
E
T
E
E
sse (I)
sse (I)
T
E
E
E
sse
sse 1
iseus sse I
E
TJ
T
E
Common Name
Scientifit Name
ratensis
MAMMALS
, Florida panther
Ever lades mink
l key deer
4
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 128 of 191
APPENDIX A.
Status
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 129 of 191
APPENDIX A.
Common Name
Scientific Name
Status
Lower Kevs marsh rabbit Svlvilaf!.Us palus/ris hefneri E
Hi" Cvoress fox souirrel Sciurus ni~er avicennia T
Shennan's fox squirrel Sciurus ni~er shermani SSC (1,2)
Eastern chipmunk Tamia.. stria/us sse fl)
Sanibellsland rice rat Oryzomys palus/ris sanibeli sse (1.2)
silver rice rat Oryzomys argenta/us E
(rice rat, lower FL Keys) (Oryzomys palus/ris nata/or)
Kev Lar"o woodrat Neotoma floridana smalli E
Key Largo Cotton Mouse Peromyscus gossypinus E
al/aoa/icola
Choctawhatchee beach mouse Peromyscus poliono/us E
a?l!!Efl!1'!_.___
Southeastern beach mouse Peromyscus polionotus T
niveivenlris
Anastasia Island beach mouse Peromyscus poliono/us E
ohasma
SI. Andrews beach mouse Peromyscus poUono/us E
oeninsularis
Perdido Key beach mouse Peromyscus poliono/us E
trissvl/epsis
Florida mouse Podomys floridanus SSC (J)
Florida masti If bat Eumops rdaucinus noridanus E
gray bat Myo/is:.E!:.isescens E
Indiana bat Myo/is sodalis E
Florida saltmarsh vole Micro/us penmylvanicus E
(Florida salt marsh vole) dukecampbel/i
Shennan's short-tailed shrew Blarina carolonensis SSC(2)
r =brevicauda] shermani
Homosassa shrew Sorex lon1!irosrris eionis SSC (2)
sei whale Balaenome ra borealis E
fin whale Balaenoptera physalus E
Jfinback whale) --- - --,._..
North Atlantic right whale Eubalaena glacialis E
(right whale) (Ba/aena glaciali.. [incl.
auslralis ])
humoback whale MeflaDlera novaeanflliae E
spenn whale Phvse1er macrocephalus E
Florida manatee Trichechus manatus latiros/ris E
I (West Indian manatee) (Trichechus manarus)
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 130 of 191
Common Name
Scientific Name
APPENDIX A.
Status
INVERTEBRATES
CORALS
pillar coral Dendro!<Vra cylindrus E
CRUSTACEANS
Panama City crayfish Procambants eco'!/inae sse (l)
(econfinacrayfish\
sims sink crayfish Procambarus erythrops sse (l )
(Santa Fe cave crayfish)
I black creek crll)'fish Procamharu,~ pictus sse (l)
. m -<-----
INSECTS ._--
--J --
Miami blue butterfly I Cycfargus [=Hermiargus] E
i thomasi belhunebakeri
Schaus' swallowtail butterfly I Heraclides aristodemus E
I oonceanus
MOLLUSKS ----
Florida tree snai I Lifluu.s.Ji2sciatus sse (I)
I Stock Island tree snail Orthalicus reses E
Or1halicus reses [not incl.
i nesodryas 1 ~".- "-
6
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 131 of 191
APPENDIX A.
KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTATIONS
List Abbreviations
FWC
E=
T=
ssc=
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Endangered
Threatened
Species of Special Concern
Reasons for sse listings prior to January 1.200 I are indicated by the number in parenthesis under the
following criteria:
(I) has a signi ficant vulnerability to habitat modification, environmental alteration, human disturbance,
or human exploitation which, in the foreseeable future, may result in its becoming a threatened
species unless appropriate protective or management techniqucs are initiated or maintained;
(2) may already meet certain criteria for designation as a threatened species but for which conclusive data
are limited or lacking;
(3) may occupy such an unusually vital or essential <xolugical niche that should it decline significantly in
numbers or distribution other species would be adversely affected to a significant degree:
(4) has not sufficiently recovered from past population depletion, and
(5) occurs as a population either intentionally introduced or being experimentally managed to attain
specific objectives, and the species of special concern prohibitions in Rule 68A-27.002, F.A.C., shall
not apply to species so designated, provided that the intentional killing, attempting to kill, possession
or sale of such species is prohibited.
IFWC)
1 Lower keys population only.
Monroe County population only.
Other than those found in Baker and Columbia Counties or in Apalachicola National Forest.
7
TESS: Threatened & Endangered Species System
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
p,p(\\i~ j~f4191
APPENDIX A.
('-,;''I.:\':i'''l u.s. Fish ,~ Wildlife Service
IJ~(/lJ Threatened & Endangered Species System
.,.~Tf
Florida
Notes:
. This report shows the SpeCiBS fisted in this state Becoming to thft Federal Register listjng dflscription
. This list does not include (Jxperimtmtsl populations and similarity of appearance listings.
This list includes species or populations vnde' the sole jurisdiction of the National Marine Fisheries Service.
Click on the highlighted scientific names below to view a Species Prolile for each listing.
llslod species (based on published population dala) - 114 listings
Sttttu, Sptlcies.'!.J=tlng Nama
.. .NOTE.. The green sea lurJ/e is listed 2
limes under urtimuk So the actual number
irsled IS- )8 Animals and J 13 Total.
Anlm.ls - 59
Bankclimber, purple (mussel) (EIIIDtoideus sloat/anus)
Bat, gray (Mom/is arisescens)
Beetle. American burying (t:1if;[Q~a.D1ftdCf1flIJ...S)
Butterfly, Schaus swallowtail (1j~r<Jc;liJJ(j1_!? aristod~mus Donceanus)
Caracara, Audubon's crested FL pop. (Folyborus plilnq,L~-,wdYb.onil)
T Coral, elkhorn (~a1miiJ11J)
T Coral, staghom (Aa~)
Crocodile, American FL pop. (Crocod!L'u5 acufus)
Curlew. Eskimo (N,Jnwn(usbOf..QJ11i.s)
Darler, OkaloQsa (EtheostQma o~aIOOSiiJ.ft)
Deer, key (Qd....Qc;Qi1fW.5 viroinianus cfavium)
Jay, Florida scrub (ApheJocoma COf!(U!!l~CfJllS.)
Kite, Everglade snail FL pop. (Rostr/laf7W,~_$..Q.cJBbilis o/umbeus)
Manatee, West Indian (7)jChechus manatus)
MoccasinsheU, Gulf (Medionidu5 Den/cillatus)
Moccasinsherr, Ochlockonee (Medianidus simosol)ianus)
Mouse, Anastasia Island beach (r-',--'rcCl;jJ'"c_iJ,:i..P';i',~'{,-.jil":;j..A~b~1-;~)
Mouse, Choctawhatchee beach (PeromY!;c.!dfiPQljgJl~t2bfy;;)
Mouse, Key largo cation CP'(!rolny?c(~s"gQf!$.Y1'J11@..Q!J;)QJ1!fQJ<1)
Mouse. Perdido Key beach (e..~!Qm-Y.EfJd~ DollonO(/JS /nssvllepsls,)
Mouse, southeastern beach (EQIJl[!1Y.J;Q"J..Q.QQ!lQflJ21YSllI.VlIIk.WJJOS)
Mouse. 81. Andrew beach (Peromyscus po/ionot!JS 2Y!J!I}SJJ{ilr!;;)
Panther, Florida (Puma (=Felis) .GQr]9QfQf cpm}
Pelican, brown except U.S. Atlantic coast, FL, AL (PeleCfllllI_S or:cif1cnlfllJs)
http://ecos . fws. gOY Iless _puhl icllpu b/stateL i sting.j Sp ?state=fL.&statll s=1 i sted
10/8/2008
TESS: Threatened & Endangered Species System
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
p,p(\\i~ ~r4t 91
APPENDIX A.
E Pigtoe, oval (PloLirobprn.'1 pyrilormo)
T Plover, piping excepl Great Lakes watershed (,Ch:Jr,'~(irius me1odus)
Pocketbook, shinyrayed (LampsfllEi suI2Jf1I/l./latJ)
E Rabbit, Lower Keys marsh (Sylyi!J{l,tJ,s PO.lUSjrlS t.1e(llfm)
Rice rat lower FL Keys (Ory~Qmys {}.'~/ustfJS natator'J
T Salamander, flatwoods (Ambymoma ~jngu!,1tum)
E Sawftsh, smalltooth (eili1!~_J2ff1iI1.afti)
Sea turtle, green FL. Mexico nesting pops. CCi1f1!!l.ruaJTJ'LQas)
T Sea turtle, green except whflte endangered (.Cl1t:(a.uia..mxQ8S)
Sea turtle, hawksblll (Er9tmochelvs imbriC8ta\
E Sea turtle. Kemp's ridley (Leoidochelvs kemfJiJ.)
S~a turtle, leatherback (~mochclv:; c.:;tja~<Ui)
T Sea turtle, loggerhead (Cfj(qfia 9~{Qtfa)
Seal, Caribbean monk (Monlitchvs tropk;~/j$.)
T Shrimp, Squirrel Chimney Cave (PlJ~a(lffiQnjl1e$--';I.Lf1]fTIif]w)
T Skink, bluetail mole (Eumace$~aius lividvs)
T Sklnk, sand (Neoseos revnoiJ;W)
T Slabshelf, Chipola ((;.lliRJio qh.!.QQli';!em.fs)
T Snail, Stock Island tree (OJ1!JaL~/,Lv~~Lim:LnfJ~.QdtYMl)
T Snake, Atlantic salt marsh (!:'ifJrcxtia..di.lfk1j 1iH1n~U1)
T Snake, eastern indigo (QrYJllWf!1Q.n corais coI!1l.fl!!)
Sparrow, Cape Sable seaside (A0f]JQClLa17JJ!~.JTlim1ir!lus mirabi/is)
Sparrow, Florida grasshopper (!~-'ll[Tl~1:!.l&. savannafum floridanuti)
E StOrk, wood AL, FL, GA, se (M~~is<.<1!liJ)
T Sturgeon, gulf (AclDenser oxvrinc~)
Sturgeon, shortnose (Acirmnf;p'{ hrnvirostmm)
T Tern, roseate Western Hemisphere except NE U.S. (S/Qn];;u;iallgaJJli dougalfil)
Three-ridge, fat (mussel) (Amb/ema neisle@
Vole, Florida sail marsh (Mi{;!"c:,;~; pcn!7s}/'v.I!:iL.,
Whale, flnback (Ealil,eJlJ)Pt~ra. physa/us)
Whale, humpback (Megf7ptera (lovaOf]fJglia9)
E Whale, right (BaI8~(]fullljfiilli.s_alJr;L.1iIj;;i1l?11ifjj)
E Wolf, gray Lower 48 States. except where delisted and where EXPN. Mexico. C(<'llljs lupu.$)
E Woodpecker, red-cockaded (E'j~QJg~~ porea/is)
E Woodrat, Key Largo (N,eQloma floriQana smalll)
http://ecos. fws. gov/tess _publ ic/ /pub/stateListi ng .jsp"state=F1.&status=listed
10/8/2008
TESS: Threatened & Endangered Species System
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
pi~ei J.vb!4191
APPENDIX A.
Status SpIIcJe$ILlsllng Name
Aster, Florida golden (Chrysnpsls florJd,ma)
Beargrass, Brllton's (NolincTpnrtolllana)
Beauty, Harper's (l-!arpQfo.c:,':jII~!;ji{H:.~)
Bellflower, Brooksville (C:JmR;1nu/:J {()bmSI~7~)
Birds-in-a-nest, while (Md!..imrk~talb3)
Blazingslar, scrub (Ll;JttiS oflfJngCfac)
T Bonamia, Florida (?QO.iirr..!!.fL9r~f)diflora)
T Buckwheat, scrub (~(ioQonlJm lona/fofiom var. anaDhalifoJium)
T Butterwort, Godfrey's (pingLJicl,Jltl ionanlhil)
Cactus, Key tree (eJjQsocereus robiniJ)
Campion. fringed (SilBfJP. nolvDdft1la)
ChaHseed. American (Skhwafbea al!1fmr;.imi1)
Cladonia, Florida parlorats (CI~oDia perforata)
Fringe-tree, pygmy (ClJJs2.MG.IllLLuygmae(J.f})
T Gooseberry, Miccosukee tRibes eChinellum)
Gourd, Okeechobee (CuclJrbita oxeechobp.pnsls c;soJ2!5i1.eCtlooefWSis)
E Harebells. Avon Park (Ca>1afaria allon~fJSJs)
E Hypericum, highlands scrub (HYP.J1ricum cUlTlullcQf11)
Jacquemontia, beach (Jl1(QILBfJlontla recllnaia)
Lead-plant, Crenulate lAmorpha.c.rer!iJJaJal
Lupine, scrub (U1lJinuJi.aodo((Jm)
Meadowrue, Cooley's (ItJaltcJlUDJ G..ooleYI)
Milkpea, Small's (~!iL$l1Jal1i1)
Mint, Garrett's (D1cl?.!i!ndra christ,[n8n11)
Mint, Lakela's (OiCl1fEJ)ska immawlara)
E Mint, longspurred (Q!.9ffMIl.ra camutis5ima)
Mint, scrub (Dicerandra~g;Q[ls)
Mustard, Carter's (Warea C<1.rt(;[I)
E Pawpaw, beautiful (f)!1flrngothamnvs p.ulf;.h~lIl!s)
Pawpaw, lour-petal (/l.s(min.J tetra{TIerf])
Pawpaw, Rugal's (~JlJgejJJ)
T Pigeon wings (ClilQrmJ[fJ.l1UJflS)
Pinkroot, gentian (Splge.llfU)fl!J.1iiJD.QKf...t;~)
Plum, scrub (pfLLnu:.?JlJl.OieJ!!ata)
Potygala, Lewton's (PQ1Y{Uf.!a.)ewtOfJi1)
http://ccos.fws.gov/tess_public//pub/stateListing.jsp?state=FL&status=listed
I 0/812008
TESS: Threatened & Endangered Species System
Potygala, tiny (POlygafn smalli,)
Pondberry (Lincie's molissitolla)
E Prlckty.apple, fragrant (Cecevs e/7cp/.;or(I.<; var. fragra:is)
E Rhododendron, Chapman (Ahor!(Jdcl1cirq.n.c.llilQro.~l!Jl)
Rosemary, Apatachicola (CWJ[,lQJ1l.i1 ala..om)
Rosemary, Elonia (Conradina efopLfJ)
Rosemary, short-Ie~ved (Conrad!!!~,1JrjJY.i1Q]iI1)
Sandlace (Po.fygQ(I!i!!~.l!lY1iQRl1YJliJ)
Seagrass. Johnson's (!:ialJJi2l1iiiJf1asonil)
T Skullcap, Florida (SI<uliWi3.Ii.a.lIQlid:;ma)
E Snakeroot (frxnglvm f:unQf!o.liYm)
Spurge. deltoid (Cl1amat:,<;Y.(I~ rlRltnifjfls:1 S~r'l. dC!!~oirl"'!1)
T Spurge, Garber's (~i,lIb_e[1)
Spurge, lelephus (Euohorbi:t telAOhioidBS)
E Tarraya, Florida (TJJrrey_a t81i{p/ii;j)
Wares, wide-leal (Wares amDlexifolia)
Water-willow, Cooley's ("!M~cJil.~)
Whitlow.wort, papery (ParonvCnitl chart.ac~,{iI)
Wireweed (PJ2,1ygonells P4mIEflVifJ)
ZiziphU$, Florida (Z/zjj}h~ c;e.1atct)
Agenda Item No. 7A
p$~J,3J~~~
APPENDIX A.
FWS Endanaered SDe~le_$.tIOm~ I ~ I QQn1a.GtECQ1? ) P!lY?~ ! ~
http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_publi~llpub/stateListing.jsp?state=FL&status~listed
10/812008
APPENDIX C.
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 136 of 191
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY FIELD SHEETS
PROJECT:
COUNTY:
DATE:
OBSERVER:
TIME START:
TIIME END:
WIND:
TEMP:
RAIN:
CLOUD COV:
WATER:
COMMENTS:
BLACK:& VEATCH TAMPA 011
COLLIER
09124-1010412008 ALL SURVEYS
AM & PM TOTAL COUNT
MICHAEL R. RAMSEY
0630 AM
1945 PM
0-15
69-83 F
NONE
10-80 %
BIRDS
RED SHOULDERED HAWK
BLUEJAY
CARDINAL
PILEATED WOODPECKER
CAT BIRD
EASTERN BLUEBIRD
GREAT EGRET
MOCKING BIRD
HAIRY WOODPECKER
RED BELLIED WOODPECKER
MOURNING DOVE
VULTURE BLACK
MAMMALS
RACCOON
REPTILE
SLENDER GLASS LIZARD
BLACK RATE SNAKE
TOTAL
COUNT
1
14
7
11
2
27
1
23
3
15
15
2
4
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 137 of 191
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY FIELD SHEETS
PROJECT:
COUNTY:
BLACK :& VEATCH TAMPA 011
COLLIER
DATE:
09.24.08
AM
MICHAEL R. RAMSEY
0645 AM
0930 AM
NONE
76 F
NONE
10-20 %
OBSERVER:
TIME START:
TIIME END:
WIND:
TEMP:
RAIN:
CLOUD COV:
WATER:
COMMENTS:
BIRDS
RED SHOULDERED HAWK
BLUEJAY
CARDINAL
PILEATED WOODPECKER
CAT BIRD
EASTERN BLUEBIRD
GREAT EGRET
MOCKING BIRD
HAIRY WOODPECKER
RED BELLIED WOODPECKER
MOURNING DOVE
VULTURE BLACK
COUNT
3
2
2
2
5
MAMMALS
RACCOON
REPTILE
SLENDER GLASS LIZARD
BLACK RATE SNAKE
Agenda Item No.7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 138 of 191
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY FIELD SHEETS
PROJECT:
COUNTY:
BLACK:& VEATCH TAMPA 011
COLliER
DATE:
09.24.08
PM
MICHAEL R. RAMSEY
1730 PM
1945 PM
10-15 N
81 F
NONE
40-50 %
OBSERVER:
TIME START:
T1IME END:
WIND:
TEMP:
RAIN:
CLOUD COV:
WATER:
COMMENTS:
BIRDS
RED SHOULDERED HAWK
BLUEJAY
CARDINAL
PILEATED WOODPECKER
CAT BIRD
EASTERN BLUEBIRD
GREAT EGRET
MOCKING BIRD
HAIRY WOODPECKER
RED BELliED WOODPECKER
MOURNING DOVE
VULTURE BLACK
COUNT
2
MAMMALS
RACCOON
REPTILE
SLENDER GLASS liZARD
BLACK RATE SNAKE
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 139 of 191
PROJECT;
COUNTY:
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY FIELD SHEETS
DATE:
OBSERVER:
TIME START:
T1IME END;
WIND;
TEMP:
RAIN;
CLOUD COV:
WATER:
COMMENTS:
09.26.08
BLACK:& VEATCH TAMPA 011
COLLIER
AM
MICHAEL R. RAMSEY
0630 AM
1000 AM
NONE
71 F
NONE
<5 %
BIRDS
RED SHOULDERED HAWK
BLUEJAY
CARDINAL
PILEATED WOODPECKER
CAT BIRD
EASTERN BLUEBIRD
GREAT EGRET
MOCKING BIRD
HAIRY WOODPECKER
RED BELLIED WOODPECKER
MOURNING DOVE
VULTURE BLACK
MAMMALS
RACCOON
REPTILE
SLENDER GLASS LIZARD
BLACK RATE SNAKE
COUNT
1
2
1
2
5
2
2
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 140 of 191
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY FIELD SHEETS
PROJECT:
COUNTY:
BLACK :& VEATCH TAMPA 011
COLLIER
DATE:
09.26.08
PM
OBSERVER:
TIME START:
TIIME END:
WIND:
TEMP:
RAIN:
CLOUD COV:
WATER:
COMMENTS:
MICHAEL R. RAMSEY
1715 PM
1930 PM
0-5 N
83 F
NONE
10-20 %
BIRDS
RED SHOULDERED HAWK
BLUEJAY
CARDINAL
PILEATED WOODPECKER
CAT BIRD
EASTERN BLUEBIRD
GREAT EGRET
MOCKING BIRD
HAIRY WOODPECKER
RED BELLIED WOODPECKER
MOURNING DOVE
VULTURE BLACK
COUNT
1
2
MAMMALS
RACCOON
REPTILE
SLENDER GLASS LIZARD
BLACK RATE SNAKE
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 141 of 191
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY FIELD SHEETS
PROJECT:
COUNTY:
BLACK :& VEATCH TAMPA 011
COLLIER
DATE:
09.27.08
AM
OBSERVER:
TIME START:
TIIME END:
WIND:
TEMP:
RAIN:
CLOUD COV:
WATER:
COMMENTS:
MICHAEL R. RAMSEY
0700 AM
1000 AM
0,5 N
72 F
NONE
70-80 %
BIRDS
RED SHOULDERED HAWK
BLUEJAY
CARDINAL
PILEATED WOODPECKER
CAT BIRD
EASTERN BLUEBIRD
GREAT EGRET
MOCKING BIRD
HAIRY WOODPECKER
RED BELLIED WOODPECKER
MOURNING DOVE
VULTURE BLACK
COUNT
4
1
2
1
3
MAMMALS
RACCOON
REPTILE
SLENDER GLASS LIZARD
BLACK RATE SNAKE
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 142 of 191
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY FIELD SHEETS
PROJECT:
COUNTY:
BLACK:& VEATCH TAMPA 011
COLLIER
DATE:
09.27.08
PM
OBSERVER:
TIME START:
TItME END:
WIND:
TEMP:
RAIN:
CLOUD COV;
WATER:
COMMENTS:
MICHAEL R. RAMSEY
1715 PM
1930 PM
0-5 S
81 F
NONE
50-60 %
BIRDS
RED SHOULDERED HAWK
BLUEJA Y
CARDINAL
PILEATED WOODPECKER
CAT BIRD
EASTERN BLUEBIRD
GREAT EGRET
MOCKING BIRD
HAIRY WOODPECKER
RED BELLIED WOODPECKER
MOURNING DOVE
VULTURE BLACK
COUNT
4
5
1
2
MAMMALS
RACCOON
REPTILE
SLENDER GLASS LIZARD
BLACK RATE SNAKE
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 143 of 191
PROJECT:
COUNTY:
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY FIELD SHEETS
DATE:
OBSERVER:
TIME START:
TIIME END:
WIND:
TEMP:
RAIN:
CLOUD COV:
WATER:
COMMENTS:
0930.08
BLACK :& VEATCH TAMPA 011
COLLIER
PM
MICHAEL R. RAMSEY
1700 PM
1930 PM
0-5N
80 F
NONE
70-80 %
BIRDS
RED SHOULDERED HAWK
BLUEJAY
CARDINAL
PILEATED WOODPECKER
CAT BIRD
EASTERN BLUEBIRD
GREAT EGRET
MOCKING BIRD
HAIRY WOODPECKER
RED BELLIED WOODPECKER
MOURNING DOVE
VULTURE BLACK
MAMMALS
RACCOON
REPTILE
SLENDER GLASS LIZARD
BLACK RATE SNAKE
COUNT
1
2
1
1
3
2
2
Agenda Item NO.7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 144 of 191
PROJECT:
COUNTY:
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY FIELD SHEETS
BLACK:& VEATCH TAMPA 011
COLLIER
BIRDS
RED SHOULDERED HAWK
BLUEJAY
CARDINAL
PILEATED WOODPECKER
CAT BIRD
EASTERN BLUEBIRD
GREAT EGRET
MOCKING BIRD
HAIRY WOODPECKER
RED BELLIED WOODPECKER
MOURNING DOVE
VULTURE BLACK
DATE:
OBSERVER:
TIME START:
TIIME END:
WIND:
TEMP:
RAIN:
CLOUD COV:
WATER:
COMMENTS:
MAMMALS
RACCOON
10.03.08
AM
MICHAEL R. RAMSEY
0645 AM
0930 AM
0-5 N
69 F
NONE
10-20 %
COUNT
2
2
4
3
REPTILE
SLENDER GLASS LIZARD
BLACK RATE SNAKE
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 145 of 191
PROJECT:
COUNTY;
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY FIELD SHEETS
10.04.08
BLACK :& VEATCH TAMPA 011
COLLIER
AM
DATE:
OBSERVER:
TIME STAAT:
TIIME END:
WIND:
TEMP;
RAIN:
CLOUD COV:
WATER:
COMMENTS:
MICHAEL R. RAMSEY
0645 AM
0945 AM
00-5 N
83 F
NONE
10-20 %
BIRDS
RED SHOULDERED HAWK
BLUEJAY
CARDINAL
PILEATED WOODPECKER
CAT BIRD
EASTERN BLUEBIRD
GREAT EGRET
MOCKING BIRD
HAIRY WOODPECKER
RED BELLIED WOODPECKER
MOURNING DOVE
VULTURE BLACK
MAMMALS
RACCOON
. REPTILE
SLENDER GLASS LIZARD
BLACK RATE SNAKE
COUNT
2
2
1
5
2
2
2
3
. .
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 146 of 191
PROJECT:
COUNTY:
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY FIELD SHEETS
DATE:
OBSERVER:
TIME START:
TI/ME END:
WIND:
TEMP:
RAIN:
CLOUD COV:
WATER:
COMMENTS:
10.03.08
BLACK:& VEATCH TAMPA 011
COLLIER
PM
MICHAEL R. RAMSEY
1730 PM
1745 PM
NONE
83 F
NONE
10-20 %
BIRDS
RED SHOULDERED HAWK
BLUEJAY
CARDINAL
PILEATED WOODPECKER
CAT BIRD
EASTERN BLUEBIRD
GREAT EGRET
MOCKING BIRD
HAIRY WOODPECKER
RED BELLIED WOODPECKER
MOURNING DOVE
VULTURE BLACK
MAMMALS
RACCOON
REPTILE
SLENDER GLASS LIZARD
BLACK RATE SNAKE
COUNT
1
1
2
2
3
2
2
; 4,
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 147 of 191
&ologlcal, Environmental, Agricultural Land Management, Permitting, Septic Evaluations
............... ...".. ~.
~a~.~ey In~.
LEP, CWB, CFEA, REPA, CEHP
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
---
LEP - Licensed Environmental Professional
CWB - CeI1ified Wildlife Biologisl
l.."TEA . Certified Florida Environmenlal Assessor
REPA. RegiSlered Environmenlal Property Assessor
CEHP . Certified Environmental Health Professional
OSHA 5 - Hazardous Materials Incidenl Commander
E.mail: Ramsey.lnc@embo.rqmail.com
Office: 239.564.1660, Fax: 866.334.1496
26314" St. NW, Naples. FL 34120
www.ramseyinc.net
08 October 2008
CU-2008-AR-14085 REV: 1
RENDA BROADCASTING
Project: 2008070019
Date: 12'24'08 DUE: 1/27'09
Ms. Jody Lima
Black & Veatch Corp.
60 1 Walnut Street
Suite 550 W
Philadelphia, PA 19106
PROJECT, Renda Broadcasting Corp" Black & Veatch Tampa OIl;
PID 00405160008 ;
Street Address: 5860 Crews Rd.;
City: Naples ; State: FL; County: Collier;
Sec 08 Twn 50 Rge 26; Road Frontage: 330 feet; Acres: 5.0
Ms. Lima.
This letter is in response to your request for a review of the project property as described above per the rules of the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), the South Florida Waler Management District (SFWMD),
andlor the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) for the presence of jurisdictional wetlands andlor surface waters
and the need for pennits (Figures 1 and 2).
To detennine if jurisdictional wetlands are present 3 components (soils. vegetation. and hydrology) of a parcel of
property are investigated for wetland characteristics. If any 2 of the components have wetland characteristics then
DEP/SFWMD claim jurisdictional wetlands. If all 3 components have wetland characteristics then the USACOE
claims jurisdictional wetlands also. Depending on the situation pennits could be required from DEP/SFWMD and
USACOE prior to commencement of any type of construction activity in jurisdictional wetlands. DEP and USACOE
claims Old Fann Field Ditches as jurisdictional surface waler areas if they are generally 2 feet or wider. have a side
slope greater than 3: I, supply water to a wetland, and there is no current pennit in effect on the property.
SOILS. The soils are mapped by the Nalural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) for Collier Co. The soils
present are #14 Pineda (H), and #21 Boca. The #14 soil is considered to be a weiland soil type by NRCS (Figure 3).
Soil sampling onsite did reveal wetland charncteristcs in the 624. and 419 areas.
VEGETATION. The vegetation on the property is defined by the Florida Land Use, Cover and Fonus Classification
System (FLUCFCS, Figure 4,5,6) as:
#1 & #2 624 Cypress Pine Palmi DEP,USACOE Jurisdictional Wetland 3.79 acre"
#3740/310 Disturbed Land/Om" Prairie DEP/SfWMD. tJSACOE Upland O. t 5 acres;
#4 740/8212 Distrubed Land/Communication Towerrs DEP/SFWMD.USACOE Upland 0.38 acres;
#574018145 Distrubed Land/Access Driveway DEP/SFWMD.USACOE Upland 0.22 acres;
#6 & #7 419 Other Pine DEP/SfWMD,USACOE Juri,dictiomll Wetland 0.23 acres;
HYDROLOGY. Last. for DEP/SFWMD there were indications of hydrology on the property in the 624 areas. For
USACOE, there were indications of hydrology on the property in the 624 areas. However, USACOE can assume
there is hydrology when weiland vegetation and NRCS hydric mapped soils are present. Therefore, Ihe 419 areas are
assumed to have hydrology present.
CONCLUSION. This review of the property indicates that there are jurisdictional wetlands on the property
as delineated by the by the 624 and 419 areas.
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 148 of 191
Renda Broadcasting Corp. Bla,k &: Veatch Tllmpa 011
Pid 00405160008. 5860 Crews Rd.
Initial EVAluation
08 October 2008
Page 2
Construction or land clearing activities on this parcel will require an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) from
DEP/SFWMD for impacts to jUlisdiclional wetlands and/or surface waters if any part of the 624 areas are impacted. II
will also require a US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) permit for impacts to wetlands, and a review by US Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for impacts to Florida panther and/or wood stork habitat if any of the 624 and/or 419
areas are impacted. This property would be considered "connected to a '[NW' by USACOE.
Please note that this review was done prior to you having a Surveyor mark the cornets of your selected lot and the
boundaries were estimated. Indicated wetland lines may change due to the DEP permitting process and closer
investigation. If this evaluation is more than I year old. the property needs to be revisited to note any changes.
Please call if you have any questions.
~-
Michael R. Ramsey
President
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 149 of 191
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
10
COLLIER COUNTY, FL
5 0
r--_
5
15 Miles
,
figure 1. Project Location Map;
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011,5860 Crew. Road, PID 00405160008,
See 08, Twn 50, Rga 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
-+-.
Ramsev Inc.
Envlronmen'al Consulting
2631 4th St. NW
~:I.'ll.l~\6r120
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 150 of 191
jfjJ
PROJECT LOCATION - DETAIL MAP
f,\1I~ V, II~ ~ II I
~Jl~~1 ':~~
=- AV'...u5i[ri= h f=:~ rc L
d,~,~o I 1 I J,C e-] 1- ~~
I ~ = 0
I ~ If"
)~~
-y a I -'j;' .~ (
) c I I I II ~~ I /\\ ~ ~
~ ''1F~iuD' II +- ~-~~~
I ["[ l ~- I-~ ~ i= f-- IW r
1~ tIILl I i I =
~ @ III II I i ~ I ,! . I =
~ ~~}'~L~~r II [__ i
~ 1[1 \\\\ \61 i~ ,I' --
Ii MtFT ~-..-~~. I ~ 'J- ~.
~j - I L11 ~,~i' ~ ,I~.~ ::,~ll / \
t~ ! 'e -l~ h +~ I
!J~ I,,!:.L LI fl'! . ,,<~~:1~, \ I l r
N
+
s
Figure 2. Project Location Detail Map;
Ramsev Inc.
Environmedtal Consulting
2631 4th St. NW
~i',.I:I4:';~6~4120
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011, 5860 Crews Road, PID 00405160008,
Sec 08, Twn 50, Rge 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
~
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 151 of 191
SOIL MAP
#14
PINEDA
FS
(H)
+
Figure 3. Soli Map of project locatIon. Source US Dept. of
Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, 1990,
Soli Survey., Floirlda;
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011,5860 Crew. Road, PID 00405160008,
See 08, Twn 50, Rge 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
Ramsev Inc.
Envlronmen'lai Consulting
2631 4th St. NW
~JI!:1l~~6l4120
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 152 of 191
FLUCFCSI VEGETATION MAP
330 FT
BE
I
><
><
624
PINE CYPRESS PALM
DEPfSFWMD .JURIS. WETLAND
USACOE .JURIS. WETLAND
#1 3.73 AC
#2 0.06 AC
TOTAL 3.79 AC
m:m 740310
ItWiiI DlfIURBED LAND f
gEP/I!.C~Ir;\I'LAND
USACOE' ULAND
#30.15 AC
O 7408212
DISTURB!OD LAND t
COMMUNICATION TOWERS
DEPfSFWMD UPLAND
USACOE ULAND
#4 0.38 AC
~ 740 8145
~ DISTURBED LAND f
ACCESS DRIVEWAY
DEPISFWMD UPLAND
USACOE ULAND
#5 0.22 AC
419
~ OTHER PINE
~ DEP/SFWMD UPLAND
USACOE .JURIS. WI!TLAND
#6 8.15 AC
#7 .08 AC
TOTAL 0.23 AC
. BUILDING
. ELECTIRICAL UTILITY
. TOWER
l-
I&.
o
M
'"
I
.
.4~
~
"
---------------r J
n __ n __ n _~.J _ I i I
x.;;
,?
~'
~ < ~
"'---.....~~ :;x
, ~,I.,lTi,Wil
CREWS ROAD ROW
+
s
o
40
Figure 4, FLUCFCSf Vegetation Map;
Ramsev Inc.
Envlronmenial Con"ultlng
2631 4th St. NW
~rl.'314.'1'&6~4120
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011, 5860 Crews Road, PID 00405160008,
Sec 08, Twn 50, Rge 26. totaling approX. 4.77 acres.
AERIAL FLUCFCSI VEGETATION MAP
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Figure 5. Aerial J FLUCFCSJ Vegetation Map;
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011, 5B60 Crews Road, PID 0040516000B,
Sec DB, Twn 50, Rge 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
Ramsev Inc.
Envlronmedilll Consulting
2631 4th St. NW
~fr!:~'&6cf4120
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
ZOOM OUT AERIAL
+
Figure 6. Zoom Out Aerial;
Ramsev Inc.
Envlronme.nal Consulting
2631 4th St. NW
~J,.I~'s6~120
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011,5860 Crews Road, PID 00405160008,
Sec 08, Twn 50, Rue 28, totaling approx. 4.77 Bcres.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
D <
SITE PHOTOS
Ramsev Inc.
Envlronm_'tal Consulting
2631 4th St. NW
~r!U1~'&6.r120
-, Figure 12. Site Photos; DATE 10.03.08
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011, 5880 Crews Road, PID 00405180008,
Sec 08, Twn SO, Rge 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
DEPfWY] WETLANDS DETERMNATION FIELD WORK SHEET
.~__ 011.22.01 _ -!ll!I!.tAILR.RA....Y R~!l'lEYNC ClIENTIlLAC.'VUTC!iTAMP.lOl1LAEMOAIROMCASTNCI
,!,~l,!!!P~_~_____ ~OPERTY~~l ,.,lI04OSleDllOlflllO.!;IIl!~~.,._
1212 COMIllUNICAflON TOWIlR 1I14l11ACCISS DR AY
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 156 of 191
. oooaollt.lI'[aAl.eo.~I'lJII"~ naNlElCITwrf~.llUl.veJlIIeDGl'l(NL~ncV""'"*,,AI'I[tH.CNICIl>t(JtO.H).<HlI1/M.I'CI~~A011Yf~T>eI~
Cft""nUOCllfl.N;'nQJo. DllC>aIo1eI....'JIlo(:n~~~V.ofl1iCTlltft"lIICtW._$IOltu::flU.,...'IH"lCJll'lE[HfII~_~rlDol"".CF-ron:J'r1f-
DlTCHEiSPA!l!Il!!HT: YES NO .!!.IUFlOI :;:-H-=-=g--~:~c':::-N.u. IUJRF'ACF.WAn..
VEGETATION: YO_NO ~
CANOPV fllDlCATOIIaTlU.TA, OKAIWlTI_ YIGITATICHlIloAS TO II''''' 0II1tOf111 ~ .uIlIALCOYl:IW)a
"'A ...,AC - II 'llo ,/tCW II ~ OIL
",MJSELLOTTI'IDtN&AlI'l .,. OLlEI'CUSLIlUAIFOL'AlFWI '" T!l..OOIUMflln~tiuMlOl
-='llo~'AUIETrO(f) "l. A.CERRlAJlUto'l;~WJ ,., ""'R8I!A""'~IJliT'ilUI,_'ltOI
__'lI.IoI'I'RfC,t,CE"'-IFl'MIFl ~ CElTISLAEYll)ATA -,., ILEXCAll91Nl'10l
'lloBQlIIl.lllTlFiltlllNTHlrOUlJ9(fj -"I\. SM.llCC~"'-Ol"'","",O)
='lIoUE'-"LElJCAOOM:llJl!~P;YI~\F) .,. l'"RAJlINU&C.olAOLII<IIA"lAlOl
___,ACo\CIAALfilIClLIFOR.Iol'$lI'l __ Ci"'_ _'__.~_
SUIJCAHOf'Y MllCATOf!lJTItATA: (lHoUW:;fIJll2lflDViIUJATrJlIlMlTOH,O"O.OAMOAlIOI'AUUl.COVlIIVtGII
"'A :::.e'L~OTTIVOE~ a: ~:U5LALfilII'OtIIllFW) 0 : ~OIUMDISTIC""U"":01
-'II.I~PAL"TIO(f1 '" Acr."'~I'llM.FW) -"" PUl$fA'M.U5TRIS..-.qOI
-'lI._iCACEI'IIII'f'MlP1 '" CElTIS~AlVIOA'A --110 ILEXCASS1NlCQ)
>-1IosctflH..lSTI",..Itffif:FOUUSlFf .,. COANJSFOEMtNAIFYI'} ~, SllLlXCARO..IANAlOl
=1IoAlELALE~0UI~NeAVlAlFf - "" rlwCfN!JSCAAOWNlAN.AIOJ
_'lI.U"'El<<)AREPi~(r) -:='10 CliI',....i.AH1'I1USOCClDE~....lSIOl
_'I,~ICASAlJl'iIEAlF)
_ 'l'O"""""$WI!QtMNEN6IS__oucr"'~f1
%OIOSPmOS YJRaINlANAI'1
~1lofUOf.N1"'CLUNI("l
-...ACACIAALlRICLlIFQAloIfS(F)
,~ -
~----,~.._._~
INDklATOftllTRATA CHAMCTiAmNGVlQlTATlONllMnt .'C1'11o OllllllOM 01" __ C;(JVil'lAQl
QAOUNDCoYl!JIl
...A'I,Fo\Cl
1loPINUllEUOfTIYDENS.'l1fj
-'IIo$AllAl.P"'I."'HTOI~1
=1looMillCACfiAlFERill')
""Sl>!INJ/jl1!ftElIIHTMII'Ol.IUSI"l
-....-lloftoEl.Al.I\.CAOUINOlENlRYIAl'i
-'II..IlElllENOARIII'<</IIS(l'f
=1lo'ICIltSAlJlllutFl
_ ._'lloMYRSl..OU..ueMSlS....._"'-"""...'1FI
1loDlO6f''I'R06VIRGl_(I')
~- 'IIofIJJ!NACUMlNI"l
-...ACAOlAAl.f\IC\l.IFOAMfS(F)
l!:i!.lloA~OlJOIIIVIROl"'CUSll'l
~1.9..1loAl'lI8TlllASiTIIIICT"'(f)
1loAlCONOI'USSl'lF)
~-'II.a.\OCH'lRISHAL""'fOlIA(f)
l!L1lo8lQlNSPILOSAjF)
1loSUMELlAIFl
-1loDI(l(TMlIASH10TI"l.IFl
-= "'~I05COACA lllJLlIW6"'Ajf?1
-- ..ERAQR05TI$SPIFJ
-'lI.l'iAIOEfOI'~ACIFO<.ltl5{F)
..&R'YNl)ILJ.laALOWINI(FJ
=..lil.l'ATOI'ULAlSPIF'l
~"4ELJTHAlIIASP(F)
'lIoFfMl.RISTT\.IS'PAT~CEA(l')
-'lI.fOIIESTlEfl,lSEGll'lE\\AT"lF}
-""U!lCOPAC"'VOf'AOAjF)
-=::1lo1_RAUCV'.INlRICAIF7COClOl'l)
1\.LAC~UCAJlK)l.A~(Fl
---"I\.LTONIAFERRUGrf'EAlI')
-'MB.OOHU.COFlCI<IA,FQUA(F)
-lloMlItANlA!>CANDfNlim
!--lO'lI.PI'M.ASf'(fJ
-~1loPSVGlolOTRIAS,.{FI
-. 'lIoRlIlUSSPf'l
"I\.SA.AlftUCUSC.....DfNS1S(F}
:r-1lo6E6BANlASPll'!
'-~1loS[l,"'I"'()l'.NICtlLATAfF}
-... S.....AX$I' jF}
- 'lC. TOlCICOPII/tlACI.'lRADIC"'N:i{1')
e::;o'll.VITISAOTUNO"Ol-I!l.lfJ
-""wl!:OElt...ml0u.oTA
HYDROLOGIC INDICATORS: yeS
AlllAlW,TS
WATERMARKS
~~~OF.BI1IS
~LS: HVDRIC INDICATORS: YES
,"""-""
....._Pnl......
F5Tr.ckDorkSYo1...
Fl0....
z:=:nl=<>doI
""o.v.....s......
A7~'"M..ocky".....
S458rfty0ltyfd,....
S~s""'YRe(lD.<
~~ ~=:~.
f2l"*,,,Cllel"I<'_'
~~3~M~
""
~~ ::-:
"" -
""
VlO~
""
YES
""
""
""
""
"" -
""
........ Yl;S
- ""
c-.." Yl:S
II-Onl' Y'E'S
"*,..... Vl"5
NO "'~'.lmuokw_Jor,."o'""...I......""'"8-_'"'"
1'lO=~'IIlI..,8......._.~"'_"...n.GO%......o...,,'.~<lf..........'1I_l.T"'.""....
ttO_,_",,,,...._.IB<lf.......tMIt1l"'"O'.I_ao.
NO 1illlt'in30~,..._
::g ~~n: ':~"~,=:=~.':'... ';:;::'~J~,,:~'~~,"e I "". ,..,,,,.,, m'''.
..0, " Z't___~''''Itoo.......
~==:r:=?;~~~~~;=tr';"--:.~:~~":'~'nc,""m.~
NO=.'IIl'_4.1f>d<.,lI1ltQooInB."'...""..........Jnr....lc....,'" l.rl....,7O"p.........._mD'D'90'W0'""'..'oI
~._-=;~=~=...:,l:==J:2:~~,==~~.O~~,~..I~~"'.I.'I...
NO.!L.ARlAl lXUNl' OIL> Lf'l: ,.,aI<1l>is'~IO~r
~ Mil AMEAL EXTE"lT08~ I HCW~..1l'IIo1..PlAW.."'V:i'to;l'AC)
ttO~"'-'Cl<50ll1l
NO XX-:- Hl'dtolog~.'Il """"".....
>o:)!L_
.....
.
.
.
:m:::
.
.
.
. .
.
HL:
.
.
.
.
.
.
'.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~:UBIJ\lfIIFOI.I-"4l'W)
AC'F1""liII~
CORU'Ol!"''''1FWl
AWPHCAAfI\,lIoI WH.ENilHIG.NfUIol (PW)
IIlEC...LBdSl"""'lJI~._.
Cl:NfI!lLAASlATI(;A(J'W}
Ofl~ICACOjf'W}
(::lASILIoINUTTtlUIl~W)
COIAll!:l.I,"",sPlFWl
CONOCA""\J9ERECTlJSll'W)
COP;EO""I$SFIFWj
C'l'PE1l:US ~iOUlAIiIl&FW)
CVJ'ERUlOClORAtu&lfWl
DICHlilOM9lACOLOAATA II'WI
QtODIAYIIV)INANA[J'W1
ElJ5rACl'tt$OL~LICA(FWl
P1MlllU$T't\.IS.o,IItflII.(fW)
GI..&l)Il"lATAlACANTl1OSlfWl
H:LIANTl-O.AlP(Fw)
I-<<DOOCOTYl.!' $~ ~W)
I'IVI'IP;tClNSrrFWI
HVPTl&AlATAIFWl
JLN:it.ISMI\IIGINATllSlf'Wl
lACHM:\CAL.l.OH 5~aooill1TTOI'bl0ll'W]
lINDEANlAGf1"'NO"'~.IfW)
JMU\l'ffI-ERA~ST.TAIl'W1
PANCWlIII!!l'EHS(fW}
PA5P.....UIIl~IGVo.-""'rS(FWJ
PlUCtEASPIf'Wl
PJoIIi)llAPIFW)
AVI4llvtI'ilUllLLAMIFWl
SCLERI",S'[I"WI
SOUOAGO IFW)
"'AATI~g,.uc~llfW)
1'teI.Yf'TERI5IiPll'WISHELO fER~
W()lJllWAROtAVlRGli'llCAI!'WI~C"'FERfj
)l~ISCA"'OUNA""'lf'N1
,.,
."~-
NO~
AOVllHT TOUS AOOTS
><YI'tflT~HlC~t;illTICILS
:~6::~~=~ KNEES
NO
110_'OW_O~(m_~IGII:J.."...rt~'"<l'''''dof'''._.
lSOlJoTID YU HOlqf_",A
SURI"AC~ WATM:
JURI!lOCTIONAL
DETERM"ATIOM
Sf'" TE Of FL: OfP SFWND
Wf:TLAND: W1<T\.AND YES NO !!....
JUAI&DICTIONAL
D~.~r~~~~'_''!:':~~~~,,g,.c~~_''''''
IOOT~, ~glT"""_~_""__
~...._-_.-
">J._..'_,_~",...':;.-;"'-........".~"",,','''''.,..'.,'-,'.."''''''''''7.
NO NlAXX
..PDlTtoNAlIPFD;
I.:iiIII
o : ~.!&IIMDlSTICHl~)
.-.=""F'EFl5'APAl.UST"'tS_..,OI
,. I~V.l,;_'_IU)
"" ilAUl(C~AOl~"lrllO)
'" flIlAlClNLlSCAROLlNliANAlOl
-'lI.(;EPHoI.I.AIffl-lu&OCCIDINTAL'SIOI
- '-", ANIIOW.GL....~.tol
-=--'" BACOI'A(O)
_.~ g~~~il:~\~)IOl
'" ElEOClWlIS $" (OJ
-=... ERtOCAlA.0i'I8PIl''''tWORT5)!OI~W)
'" F\JII'I~SClRPOD&AIOl
__'" JlICUSSP.lQJ
__ ~ % lUDWIG!A P 10)
_.'H.lVT>fllAlSPIO}
_"'I<l'I'I#i'lAfASP(O)
.. llIJH.~Rl)lACAPlUlAAI5101
-,. PANCL.UlEloiIlToo.<<:'m(O)
-,. m.yaCINUI.ISPlOl
-"" PONl"liOEIIJACOADATArOl
... MlO!leRPINACA!;PIO)
,. fllHlNCOSl'OAA(O)
:=,. SAClITTARIALAI'f"JIFOLIA(0)
...SETAIUA_AIO)
'" n1A.lIAae~C:I.B-ATAIOI
'" nl'l',I5P(O)
--_.~_...,'-~----
5URFAcew.rEiI:~ESENT
AOU/lTlG II!05S'S1LI\I~"'WOArS
"DRIFTUm:S
~~~;;:~~,~:~CKS
fXOTlC lNFESTATIOtt LEVeLS
EO. O"!lo.....EAL COVI!RAQII!"
E1 - 1","25~AREAL COW'-IUIU
F.2. 2&%-~ AAUl COYERAOE
E3. ~1"""H"ll."'REAl COvERAGE
n _1'Mt;,-100%AREAlCOVIiRAOE
. ..""
'IloAl.llIZlAJtI~llIFIl5S.N
-~~ASIIolAAUIIA!<f)_..-J
=~OLIIAelAVIIIGI""'Nt.(flJ)
-"""
. ......
""Al9IZlA,lULIBAlllSIN
~'lI.a~9ER"'SI.......-ull"'M_'1<<I
-1loOUefllCI,I$YIAGINi'HllFUl
=""IIMUSCOflAU.Il<l.NM
-"-,--_._.~--
lo.20:~I2IAJULllIIlt&SIH
~"...Io4II'lOSlAAATEMl51IFOlJAILIl
=.._lifAAlliMAAUBIIljl,li_.-.
,"CALI,ICIoI'I,...MERICAAlAlU)
-..CENCfflU&SI'IlJ}
-...CVNOOONOIoCTYlOHM_
",OAClYlISt\l.OUEP;A.TA/Ul
.- 'lI.OACTV\DCTtNlM /l4.G'/PT11H (VI.-..-
:=1loout.lODkJWSP(UI
"'lUllCOLAMlAlUJ
..----::.""lA"lT.......11'\J)
'lI.OlCA~laS1lIIICT...(U)
-1I.PNllo.o.lW.lll"'lJIoI\LI)_
d~ 1lo '_ALUNWOTAT~U1
-1loPI~tlIlIJ!l'HISAI(JIOAIUl
-"'P!T'lUPSIS...._GR.lUINII.OUAlLll
,.... PTfIIlDlLUGLiOlT$CHlUl._.~"'"
------:-" ntI'lOCAl.l.OH "''l'CNOSfACH'\''lJl,lIUl
-".QUERCUSCHAMoANlIM
--"OlJt:RCLIlVtRGI'""'~tI)
-1lo ~IoIJ$OOf'ALLINLU M
-1l.Rl1~~VTIl\)I,lA~IUl__
~,~ "" SPERMACOOe: SP.jUj
-- "'STENOTAPWlUMU.C:LMlATLJIllIlJ)..._,.~
EL1loLJllf:NAlOB,O,TA(IJ)
,..
----_.---,-
AOUAT1CP1.ANTS
8UMMElINl)
1-l'iDR000OOlCOATA
~~~~~!>IT1ON
aOlll.PRSCIIIPTIota:10YIiI
~:Z~':;lel3
~,~'e.o A ~d::~~"
~.~~~
0_70
7-0.10,0
" 4J2FINES.1'ID
~ ~~:;~KS
"'4 rl3SI\ND
SOILTVP!;
121 BOC.
SOIL-OIST\.RH~Ot.lOT""TURAl
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 157 of 191
OEPfWW) WETLANDS OETERMNATION FIELD WORK SHEET
~.P~ Ji'fOC_ _~l1A8....RAg!..!-All$iYItC CL,ENT.~ClC'VEA'OtT.MPAO'1t II~AOCASTNO
41'OTH!RPlNil". I!t " PlDoo,wJI__ MI(Ic...ROAD
---JUiI5DICl1)N"'lwjj~ -~---
. Il<TC>eI_^GMO....llA~_""'llQI "ro,,"ICIW'1lMCIII.IlUTIUllJ',~'DlCll~lW1oUlt.rICV_T>€V"""0I,DINIOM(JQNJiH)..,.vtN:)~1I_1I,l,cmt.~1tCl1I
oPtiAATl()lOPlI'lJC_ DI'l'Cla""'lj~LlIlCIlllk~'f'Mn:CTlM.M'/oC~W"llRS"0f9Ull'tll''''''.''I!'VlCJla'''~/oHJNC!.~Fll(J,l1a'Cf'_101rI'rI-
Dn'CHI!SPAESartT:
VIiS NO .,g.UI"CU
HIA.Xl YES ...._ NO _ 'UNCTIONAL
HIA U'tY NO JURIBDICTnNAL. SUlt'ACI! wan.
VEGETATION: "U.M-NO
CANOPY I'tDtCAT(lIII STun.: aww:rrllUlHCl VliGIT ATIOJII MIl TO .110"10 OltMQIIE O~ ...__ elWOWiI
....... 'lI."AC - I) 'Jl, FAc;W I) ... Ok
~","'NUSEL~OTTIVP!N!UlIF) "" QUERCUSL,l,lRIfOl.I....FWf _" t,UOOIIMOl6TlCf1IUMlOl
..!L-%SABIIL.....u.ETl"W1 =.. ACtl'll'lt.eRUioIll'Wl ="" Pl;RBe...p...LU5tRl$_"IO)
",~iC^eI!RlFEfWI'l 'II. C(LTI$l..AEVIG,l,T,l, ~"4ILVlCASglM:.lOI
-""SCI-/j/fJSTJ!"ltlNJ'HI'OI.Il,$(fj "4M\LI)(CJ\I\O..(~
-..UlilAl.IiUCAOUI~HlAVl"(l') -:--... ~MXI~C"'ROl.I~IANAIO)
-'II."'C;'O'CI......UAICl,.l..IFORI.IE~1 .2!!!!.-_.,___....__ ___'?o~~~.____~,~____
. ~""
'll.1\L8IZII\JULIUflI$!IIN
:=""URSf."-'SIWoflUU IUI ,""",.-0
_'lloO\JliIlCIJ$....IAIlINotlNAIPVJ
SUBCANOPV IOlXll lNlII::"'TOIllJTl'I&Tk CH"'RAI;n:1UIHlI Vl.GET...TIDIt.....TOSlIO'llo(M'l....Of.u-.fXlVlPIIol)I
~:.~=~~LLOTTIVD~ 0: ~:I,/8LAUAIFOLIA(VWI ~~ :--ODlIJt,lOI6TIc+R~
r"'SABALP"'UoI!n'O(Fl ' ACEA_i11IM(f'W) .% ~'RS'APALUSTRI&I_'dOl
% ',IYJhCACERlF&RAIf'1 ,.. C!LTISLAEV'(l.ATII :!L...'IIo ILEllCI\SSINlIOl
-y,sCMlNU6TERESINTllII'OLlU5IF) y, COOM.lSFOElolINIoIFWI ~'IIo So\l.lllCNlCltlilNo\lQl
-...MEtAL~UCI\QUINOI.JENiRVI"'(l'1 __'II. PAUIM.lSOAROlINIANAIO)
='ll.SHlENOAREPPIS(I') __.,'" CEJ'!i"LII~VSOCCIOEWAl-I$(Ol
,..PIOASALlREI\II"I
~'lI.M't'AS'IEQUlA""'N$IS__""""'TO~1')
~%OlOSpvAO$WlGlMAN/roI'1
--...~uQENI/IlClJMjN;l"1
-,....CACI......Ull.ICll.IFOAl.eSlFl
~~--~.,'~-. ~.
G ~UPL
%AUIIIlIAJUUSRI&$IH
-'lLS~SER...SI~MlJl.toIl""
-"~lIIClJ!IVIRCI!~r'Ul
==%AI'IUSCOPALU~IU)
~~
QROUNDCOVI!!" UJlX tIDICIoTOiIIITl'lATA: cIWIo\CTIIlIZIJIIIVIQPAT!C*.....TO.llO'lloOl'lIllOMOl'MIllAI.coYD.IllIIl
pt. 'lI.FAoC - 1040"" FIoCW 0 'lI. ML
lQ;>>.%PINU65LLonIVot:NllAIl"J ,,'ll. ~~~lfOlIAlFWI _..__'IL TAJlotJILNDIST~
d ...SA.....'....wr.notFl '110 M:ER~~! ".__% PERfli",PMu!lTIIlIS_.o(O)
~%IoMlICACiR~1AAIF1 % COIlNUSFOeIMlllIFW) ... ILEXClIMnteftll
Y.SCH!I&JSTERESltITMl'OLlUSIFI ,~L-'4 _foK.UlPUillMI.H.eHllEAOANlUMII'W) =='4 SAlIKCAAOLI~
.!.lL...t.Il!LAl.lUOAQUlHO\.a,.sIl'-VIIIIFI ~_ % BltCIRMSSIAlII~ _" _% 'A/IJlI....OMlOIJ.....~l
~'!l.SER~AAtlP!NS(F1 % CEt/TfLLA"'SlATICA(FWl .. ClPIW.AHTHL$OCClOl!.m....I$(Oj
-""lCAllAUPlEA(F) .HL'4 etfll'l'SOSAl.ANUBlC\eQrfW) =:''4 ~CLAIII'IAIOl
kllL'!l.MYRlirIlll"Ql.MNl!NlItll............."...l(FJ '" CIRSlLN1'V'I'TAlI.I(FW1 ,,_% ....COI'AlOl
""OIOSf'VP()5VII'IGINA....f11 '" OOMhELIHA$lI!l'W) ,,1l. Cl.ADlUUJ_IOE~(01
-'--"'!'OOENI...OI.MNI1) '" C(llojOCAAPUlSI!"-~CTl.IS\l'''''l --- % DICff\OloeNAV,TlmLl"'IOl
-"'...CACIAAlIRICU.l~OAIoIES(F1 'll. COIIEOPSlSSP('W) -% ElEOCH/IlRlS'I"tOl
J.iO~"t<<l"OI'QCIrONYIRo.INlCUSlf) T'4 CVM!AUSUGULAR1$1_1 ~'4 UllOll.W.OHSP/PIP!WOAT5)!0/l'Vf)
lO-IIO'IloAI'lISTIOABTRICTAlI'I III-ito;, c"""R\.$IJ()(')R/IlTU8(FW) -y, l'\Ill'lfJ.....saRPOOliAlO!
-'I'.AJlClNOPUS SP I') -.'110 1)lC!ft:)Mj""'COL-OAATA(FWl =-...% JUNCU6&p.101
:i.1i:%II;,aCH/roRlS~fOU",(F) 'I\. DIOO....VI/lQINI...NotlII"WI % U.()WIOIASPfO!
_%8IDEN!lPllOSAlF) 'I\. fI.l5TACHYSGl.At.CAI_l =='Ilo L'l"fHl'lUMSPIO)
%6U104l!L.IA(F) % rllol'lRISTTl.IS...NN..II\IF'Wl ..__'!l. ......-!A Sf' lO)
'-%DIOlTIIRIIIstI'lOTINAlF) % GlEDITSlIITllllACAHTliOSlFW1 1l. ~NnI'-QI"OAPIlUAAISIOl
-"'DIOOCOREA BLUlfl!RA (f?) 'It, H!lIANTHJS!lI'11'WI ='ll. PANlClU"'M1TCU)NIOl
-%ERAO"-OSTISSP!l') % 1i'l'Dill000000ESP(I'W! % POt.YGONlN5PlOl
-'lI,ERIGERONO~RClfOl.IUS(f} % H'fPERIC\,MP'!l'W) =% PONTI;.D11111...(lOlIlD...TA(O!
--'I'.ER'lmIUUIL\LDW!NIllFl % I-M'TI5ALATIIll'Wl '" ffiQSEl\PlNI\CA$lI10l
-.-", EuPATORIl.UP IF) % JLJN::U9~Rtil""'fUSIFW) --'!l. RtfVNOO5f'ORIlIO!
---%EUTH..J......S..I'1 ... i..,ACHMJCALl.ONp\IIOWllJ1'TDNXO/FWI =:.... aAGITTAIl.........NCII'D..III(O!
--'",'llollRISTYUSSPUIi'oCEA1FI .... Llt.IlEIINlAQRA~FLOAAlf'W1 _'ll. SETAIIIAMMi/UllOI
-%fOfleSTIERASEGRlaAf",1') % lollLilNfH!fIo/IltWITATIIlI'W1 ,'IL TtiALIAtlENlOl.lATA(0)
--'ll.ILEXOPACAVOP.\CA(F) ... PIIN!GIMRlptNtlPNl =.'" TWH/roSl"lOl
==%tt.II'''IUIATIICVlINDAICillF'COGONI _ _% P",SPALU!IlUOll..ARIS(1'Wj
'l\.LA(HjANTHESCAROLlilNO.(n % PLUCHEA5P~
--%LVONIAfERR!JOI/EA(F) .... AHEXIASP[I'WJ
--%hll!lCOHIACOAc>tOAIFOl..l"'(F) '110 ~\.IIoI!.IIVmnGILLAT1JS fl'Wl
~1l.MIIUoNlASCAfDENSIFI % SClll.~IASP1FW)
D%P..,.,......$Pl'~ % SOlIDAOO(FW)
5.10 %pSVCHQmlA$PlFl '110 SPAFlTIHAIAKII!I'-llfW)
-'I/oAUBUSSPlf') ... 'HELI'Pn;RIS5~11'W1S11ElOFERN
~".$ilMllIUCl.I5CANI\OII!N$I$fI'l % WOOOWIIADlAVIROINIC"'(PWlVCHNFE~N
~%SES8,l,MASP(1'l _'4 XYRIS c,o,ROl.INA"" l'WI
d 'l',S!Tl':AIA GfJoIIClA,AT^ II'l
L%S""lAXSPIFI
,... 'I/o TOX'COOIi~MOICAH9lFl
~",vmSROTLNDlFOLIil(F)
-..WfOfLlATRL08/IlT...
2....:~IZIAJUll.RI5$IN
-%A"AOSI"'~'ltl'OUlllUI
== '" kOuOIEroCfVI iiol.....AVaA \1>).......-.
%OAlLICA"PAANERlC-M
--%CEHCtfl./&PI\Jl
-"'OYNODOHDACT'l1.OH~l__
==%DACTYi,.I$Q~RATAlUl
'lIoDACTYlOCTI".lAolAE.QWTI\,IM(IJ)__
-'IIoOE~DlUM8PM
~'4ILn:QU,BRA(U}
..-%LANT,.,....!I'Ul
=,",OXAl,ISSTIIIIOl"'lUl
_'IIoPANI~""""lMM_
'foP""'ALUM~"T\.IIII(IJI
-:='II.Plt.OlIL!PHlSIUOIDlo/UI
_,'I\.PITYOPII''''IIIlI'lMII/rolGRAMlMI'OlIA~U)
~'fopn;AlDllAl(llEDIT~IU1Ma'f'"
....I>l!Jll.OCAlLOHf'"\"CH09TI\CtM.NIM
'::::,,"OUIl'lCL$CIWoWlI1lUl
"OUERCU!iVlillQl~U)
==lIoPlHl,$OOPALLlNLNfUj
_%~I4YNCI4LYTRUIoIR'_ILol".""-_
1D-->>....IlPlIRIoWXXlESPM
==:'"'STIM:lTN'1it'-lIIroISEClI'oU^TUIroljU)"""".....
H!....'lI.lNNotll.OllAfAlUl
~.,
_.'-~--
_.fl!!!!!_.~_,.__.~._.~_...~
HYDROLOGIC INDICATOAS: YES_NO.~
"'LGAlMArs
-W",TlRIMRKS
""""'"
RAFTIHOOFtlUIlI$
ADvt:NTlTOUSflOOrs
fM'eRTACrI'HGLENTICilS
ACTIVllcvPAl:SS1<tEES
'LOW~NNELS
liUAFACEWAllIRPRESfNT
IIQU'lTICI.IOS8I!.Sr'lWrillWORTS
ORlnlltElI
VEGH...raOTUSSOCK8/HUlrolMOC1<S
EiEVATEDLICI1INLlHI!.S
/IOUATICPlANTS
~=~CDIITA
~~~="ITU
~,
~,
m
~,
~,
~,
~,
~.
\'I!S xx
'o'ES ~-
~,
~,
~,
'-0 _ h ..,..<>' '...... ........~ 0.1_ o:twto_ I <>.II..MlnS" 5",,_
NO ...,..,...II.ns.lhi<;i<_ad'lll_"'....__SO,._ch.......f","...IIlJrlI"IIlMI<>w':rQlouol-
:;=.="~"'.:=<>f5Q''''''...sloo1l.'II...n~-OI.''''E.
NO .tlll'it"(l~",OPP'1f5-: I e.'",.... II.....,......., \<ftILI"~3...","""".~ I 0' ,....-.:1,"'". mCll'1o
NO 2'I'oO'ITID...~.l.m........-..cJ<"'''_''''''.....I'''6......"''''
~=~:..=,=~:::=':':O%'" rlI<>."'.I~"",,,S~1I4 tMowlEI
M) 1lIjW<~~!nQf.\......,.II..otII.Hinl_Jl'OlIm_..~"'_inc.........2
~=::~.':.t'":..::.-~;=~;~~:..........30d...J<tm.. I ~.t...: IO%~.""""I>)'Q"'_"_
NO.'___1Il~"'...._""""pj.._"'_e"IlIjW<.W'Irlg_12-o/tN.'"'_
NO 1_."_6"l1fC_.......,..,...a"'...lt.1'-_0I........t.o....~0I.........,,,,.,,,10"o'IWII"".
NO==--cne"",...,.,,_Dllnl<In_'--. ~"",,_,,".,....&.t_,""""''''n_.8._3D'_' ."",,,,.1,,,,...
NO.BL A~EAlEl(n.,,-(ltIL~"".; h)drIc....,~
N01!1L.IIJIU. EXTI.Nl"OUL.F...CW~.aO'O'ouPLJ.""I~rACj
NOIUI.,""-'CIl$Cllt.S
:;1f-liydmIDg~an;I~"'"
SOL DUC:NPT~: 'OYII
"""k
Ils.o.MPLfrl
Hl.D Di l~/IlFLITTEIl
0,0,2.5 A S1ISAND
5-~O e. ......T"I),.,6/t SIItlD
/oOTnES:S<2'S"'''IO
~.O.11.0 E2 .....T~IX-.I.SIIND
MOTTLU,aqSAhtl
SOILS: HYDRIC INDICATORS:
11'dlca>n'
p./J1Ili.o<;I<"'Of'."
F51'no::Io,OIllKS.m-
FIO~
M~n&Ulll<ll_
!l5Sl","'...LII\"'"
lltiarvW1cllcdln
A751:."'l.LcllyM_
5ols.....,o..,-.._.
SllSIIII!!yFll<*>'
~~=:rt.
Fflc....OlfIre<l_
~;;>-=IUl"':'.
YES ~ NO
_, 'rES
1I..1t: ~$
c-..". YES
_I I'ES
Nil,". YES
IlSII""un
~~~ ~ ~~":A~F~
E ~2~~~S
1'2 ......TFHl('~r.!S..htl
KlTTlfS:SI2S.\Nl
IIClili~WI_._""Ae..........~..,"'J~....~_.."'.__
I$Ol.I.TSD Vel NO "'AlC!-._
MAlt!..
SOl1.T'tl'f.
14PllfDA[I-Q
....
__Nl....~~~
EtOTIC NFEST A 110H L&V&Lliil
g.O"!l.....AULCOVli......OIE
101 _ '%o2,,,,,A"IiAL COYf!....QE
E2 . 21'\1,.150'0 .REAL COVER"'GE
E3 -1i1%o1ll'%ARiAL COV!R.QE
e. . 18'Jl..lllD'1io .l.Al!!Al COVEA"Oe
_",.lIT""l.__~__
~1IO_1l"0(III.1lUlIJ"'"
";""""'~("~;..,"""..,.;f':\t'...'"""'"',,..'..'T,n',"V'n..;.:',....,.......t"'''''^''t","'he
...DDfT1OMAlItFO:
-
wtrfUHD:
JURISDICTOH.L
~.:!I~~,~l~_".~~~.e..~"..}Efj e:_,~.?",.."..<.,""
SU"F.CE WATER:
JURl9DlCTIONAl
DETERNlNATION
ST.TI!!OfFl: OEP "'WIlD
WETLANO yes NO Bt_
DEF'IWMD WETLANDS DETERMNATION FIELD WORK SHEET
_~.2..YL MlCHUL..."AMR:.~M8!Y!NC :t.ltM' lUCK.. VU.T~t"'lAM'PA Ot1~.M'l!O~ADCAlTJrtQ
!_~DISTU"BI!!DLAND_,,_._~.._~_..._.~ I>II~AT'f'UG"'L~_~ 1"'~JIlI.J~
310DRYPMA
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 158 of 191
DrrCHf$ PRI!SI!!NT;
. QlI~M1Ii..~/rt.CA~l'OOfl.Ii~ n5"ME.I'Cl1'_T1..o'O'C8,IItft'AIIlJ..-CTlOO\LfIllO,I,Ulfi...y....1K".......lIUJLMO.....0I'I::lIClJW{J10W!:1CI0l-"El'M1'lIACTl~~II-I5<A
O'I!AAlICHCRfl#;TICJ'I D11t:IUNW;JI.NIS<>G'rlo..o....tCAlJIII)._y.,..Cl8l.M'ilCfi,..~.IIlOC~'_f.'"Y)CR.n:tl'!"'____OFR:N'IDI'c._lOl'OJ'(S_
VEGETATION:
CANOfIY'
MIA %FAC
'lIoPINJ/:i iLWTTI ~DEtOSAj'l
-....SA9A1.P..t..loI!T1'otF)
--'lIo~lC"CERI''-AAt'1
--. 'loSCIilM.JSTERE8I"lIlilFOt.'VSII'l
-"'lol~t.ALllJC..OUINJUHIfiR~I"IF)
.::.-:=......C..CI."vIIl1CUJFORIolES(FI
YO_NO .!!.8li11'104
Y'B "0 ~
HlA lQC_ YES _ NO _. AlHCTIONAl
MIA lOt YUi NO JU..IIOr::TnHAl; lIUR'AeIiWAn.
M:IIC"OfII'MTA: ~Vl2lPGYIQE1""ION_TOII'",OIlUOIlllOf.uMAl.C:OVIN.Ol.
o "" 'ACW 0 'I, OIIL
,. oueI'.Cl.6L"'Ll'lIFOlI.(1'W1 ... TAl<OO!UUO'STICHIU~
'" ACEAl'luell~fW) -", P(A".'...LI.6fflI5...,...,...,,(0/
.. CHTISl.'lilQA,,, -"l.ILEXCASllINl(01
--,. SAl.IXCAAO!.IIoHAIC)
-"/0 '........,NlJS.CAROlINl"....IOI
0.... ____~~~_._-
SUICAHOP'i
NA 'llo"AC
,.PINUSELLOTIlliDEII6A<'1
"'$"'~o\LPALl.lETTO(f1
%~IC"CEA''''IU(')
..'!I.SCHI/fJSTEAEBINT....FO!.IUSIF)
-,.Mel.Al.fUCAOUlfoOJEN!Illil.(F)
- % StR~NOA iIll!"94(F)
-----::::-%F'C.S.lJIIIf"l"l
~t.l'ffi8INIiGU"Nl!~IS''''''',,",''''''''''''11']
%OIOSPYfIlOl; IflIlGlN........ IF)
%f\JG~NI.ClAIlNll'I
"Il,"'""CI...........Icu.I'OIl~S(F)
~
ItClICATOIIIJT"",....' CMIU\oICfIEII2INll VEOnA'K*"",TO .1I10'S00R YOIII. Of' __ CO\I.~[
o "AI "AeW 0 ~ DIlL
.,. OUERCUS~.UI'IIFQl.IA(l'W1 ... l......OOtWPIS1IC"'~)
... ...cERfMlAlAoI(FWJ '!I. PEFl581P"'lUSlfll5.--,,(0)
" CELTI8ld~IGo\T'" ... II..t:xc.ssllClOl
.... COR/fJSfQEI,lIN,olIM\ '!I. SAUXCAAOlI"It#lIOJ
'llo FIUXINUSCAAQllNI......IOt
'!Io CEPHAlAHTrulOCCIDliNTALI$rO)
NlC.IITOIIITMT,lu CMIlFlACTIlIIIZIIG YEOETATIDIlIHU TO.Ii 11"0 ORMOM Of'....... COV.""'OII
"'"
O.OUNDCOVfA
ItA'lioFAC
%PlNUflELlOTIIVDD4Alf')
'll.1WlAl."ALMETTOjF\
'llolon1'oICACEI\IFEAA(Fj
-'!I.5C~'l!I'Ir.l!.lNTfilFO~IUS(f')
-'IloMELAlEUCIlOUlPOl,ENEflIflMFl
....SER'E"lOAREPINSdJ
-%-FIC.o.$.\lJIIE"fFl
=~~S~~~~~~'''''''''''>IFl
-... EuQl!Nl"'ClMtlI IF)
~'IIo"'C.CI""\.llIIIClLJmRMESI')
;o:.iO ... A'-VROPOGON 'I1l101tlClB(Ff
HL....FlISTIO...STRlCT.l"l
......KQHOPU&S..IF}
'IloeACQ1O.Il'SHf\LlolIFOlI.(F}
JI:B..%8IctiNSI"li..O$#l.f')
% 8:AlElI.. If)
---...ruO\T..III"'SEROTlN.lFl
- 'llo OIO$CQAE... au..8IFER. In)
-'Y.EA,l,GIl05TISll"IFI
.:= "EflmEAON~IICIfQl.'VS IF)
"f"Yi'jQILJMBALDWI~IIFI
-...iUP...TOI'lI.....S..(l')
-.... EllTHAIoolI... SI"(I'}
-...FIIYIIIRIST'!'tI$S!'.TWlCEAIFI
~~L:~~~"V~:~Io(F}
'''It.lPElIAU.CYl.l~RIC,,,,F?C03ONl
""L.cHNAIYT\oIiiCloAOL'''''''''Of'l
""LY'QNI" HRRI.Q,...... (FI
% MUCCHlA CalCHOI9IFOll"I"1
....I.IIKANI..SCA_N5(F)
>>=3i"'PIfYLA,SPtl'1
'f.1o''''PSYC~TIu'''spm
-%F'lLAlI.JSSPIF)
-,.S..IoIIiIUCUSC."",OENSISlFl
~'ll.SES!lA.Nl"'SPIF]
"""--'!IoSU~"I"IlENICUl,l.T,I.('1
.i-%5M1LAX5PIF)
~ % Tcx,CODENOAONA,l.DIC..r<<;jFj
1.1G "'VITI~ROTIHJIFOI.I"'(F)
--- 'll. WEDElIA TAlOll,l.U
HYDROLOGIC INDICATORS:
?!~~~5
-....FlINOot'OE9F'1IS
SOILS: HYDRIC INDICATORS:
1n:I.."",..
~=:::-~-
nOM.,
u~_n'''.!lRll<lIl'
A~ S~"'"...~ I,.......
"'tCrglllM:8odl..
M5cmIoU>lyM,.""
S-of;III'dyOl8ylld_.
S!s.rdy_'
S6~~'
5/ 0... ...~...
f2u..mGillyedlol_,;"
~~3~:::""'~
~~ --
~,
~,
'<<..~
'"
'"
'"
'"
""
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
C...... YES
o..~' ~ES
..,......:1_ "lOG
~.,
8.-.1'
(~!.'f!
lo-JO~
,
!-!!....~
,
,
,
,
,
,
,.,..
-,
,
,
,
,
,
,
"'...
,
,
,
.- ,
,
,
,
,~w
al.EllC\.EilAUAII'OL"'lI'W)
~flfIUIIRl.JIrIIWWl
COllrul FDE_ (FW)
.u.~"""E~AGA"WloIl'W)
III.EOHMIU $[IUIUlMO
CEI;TULA"lJl"TI~-
C~Y$08Al>>UlICAOO (FW)
CIASllMNVTTo\LLI(FW)
COMMEL_1lP I!'W)
CONOC...IlPUSEREC'USIFWl
COAIOPSISa" fF'Wl
C't'l'EAUSt.IQl.l..AIIIISlfW)
CV!'EAUSODOl'\AT\.I$4t'W1
DIC~It#lCOl.ORAT"'!!'Wl
DIOOI"'liIIlQIN.A~(FW1
llUSTAOlYSIlLALCA(FW)
FI_1ST'I'..I$~f~Wl
lllEDITSIATAIACIll'l1">tOl!l("WJ
....LIAWTI-lJSSP(FW)
~fVt.E5?'lFW)
HVf'eAlClAISP11'WI
I'fVf'TlS"'L"'UII'''')
JU!'CI,,$W.RI3lNATUSiFW)
l.I.CIoNX:AJ.t.ONl'IP(llOO8unomrOol"'N:
LiNOfRNIA OIlA~IFt.ORA IFW)
I.ElNlTHEflAlYo$l.'.(PWl
JI''''~CUolREPEH5!1'W1
P"'SP.o\Ll.MllClU.~ISWWI
PlLCHI[ASPI'W)
RfEXl"'SPjFW)
RUMeltvfRTICllLATUS IfW)
SCl.tiAl.$' IfWl
SOl.IO.lGO(FW)
SP"'FlTlNAlI'IllU'lfl'W]
rH!L'1PTER4S!>Pt"WISWECOFJ;I'IN
WOOO'o'I''''RDlA YII'IGINCA(FWI Ii GlolNFEAN
~YIIISClofK)LI"""""'1'WJ
2C1-1O'" DIll
"TAXOOIl>>IIDISTIC~)
",,1>f;l!.S!APAllSTl'II5_.HOI
--". r~~"U"';';'I"EIVJ
-."Il.....,XCAI'lOU.IoNAlOl
"" FIUXINlACAAOi.INlNU.lO)
"'CE~OCClOENTAlISIOI
-",~0L-"'8M(Ol
-----:-'" IlACOP...tO\
~- -~ % Cl.AOIUWJ_ICfNSi'(O)
% t>>CrI'lOloENIloLATIFOlI.IO)
.... Et.IEOC;tWIIrSSP(Ol
"-.... ER10CJ0U.ONS"!'I"EWQRTS)IOIFWl
'\ro FUAENA SCmPODI!AlOI
- '" JUl'Cl.I!SSIO.(OI
=='" t.l,tlWll)lA lIP (0)
'" LYTf4IWSP(01
__% _HAl'" S" (OJ
-.. 'll. lAl.H.ENBEFlQlAC,o,pIUL.l.RISIOI
% P.MCWl-ElMTOIo(lNIOj
... POL YGON.N 5I'lOl
% l'Oh'TEDEfll.CoqoU"'(O)
....'lIIOS!llf'l~I!IPIOI
'" flHVN;:OSI'OAA!O)
'" SAG'''~lALA''lCIFOLI'''(01
'K,SE'NlI"'~lo)
% n~."'IlENlcv...hIOl
... NPi'1.o. SP 101
~-
YES NO .!!-
~-
-,~---,.."~~-
SUFlF.CEW"TU.PflESENT
6~~T~7NE~SISIl.IY2RWORlS
~~1~:~~I6:~~~S
lwf.rol"'"o..._3or..McIYOm.lo'''''.........~.....I''''.
>;(l "..,...ml.Mt~._~_.d...."O"'___8O%......clYom.. ",I... "'""'1HI....12.ol........,.
::;=:~"':.::.r"'::otS"'--"'...~..o,.""-
~---:-~~..':=:~:~;,;=:=..'::.:.~,.,~J~~:m. I '" ,.;....."'..;< '""CI<
~ r""'r_~'ol"''''''_
~~=1~~?E:2.~:d~='Z;.-:."~~~:...~::..,nClYom.~
NO-=I.,..tIl-'..""'kOWllrQ_S-ololl'l........-Jo'IUI. ""'om 10''''': 70'l\0,*","'C~l>\'"-", "'_
NO g"yoo:lm...whid1,,,,tupl"IIll"Io<>l_olll_.-.g"""'lr,,,,,,,,,..._
;:g==~=:=,'"'~=-=~..::=..;.~~.='==~,~~f:'_.c"",""or....
NOl(X .RPLUT'EHTOlIl.l.f'I..I>jdooc""":"""n>IOg)'
~~:C~~~NT OlIl1 F...cw ..lll)%.I.I'LMfJ l'ileklllf'ClfAC)
::;~~Yrd~",jl
Ml'IENTITOUSAOOTS
~I'ERTflOPHlClJNTICILS
~~YEC=~I(NEEB
YES._ NO
Ucl.......I\IW.I.MO_"nlle..........~rfIlItJ~"'.""~~..u~_
ISOI."TI!D 11'.1 NOXX ""..
SURFACE WATER:
JURISDICTIONAL
DfTfRUl\lATION
S'ATEOFI'L: D!P SPWMD
WETLAND: WETLAND VIiS NO !!....-
JURISDICTIONAL
DET~~~~~"""'"',.:.,!JPl.AHl? .,',,!!~.,..!!..- NO......,......,...."."......;~..
__ NO
""'.' "DnC______
IO(tlOflIJOC'IIOOUI._"","'","""",."_OO
., "",~~ll-_'~'_"""""",,,,",~,~,,,,,,", ,.....
~t.IN"O'
EXOTIC INFESTATION LEVELS
EO . 0'lI0 AREAL COVERAl)1!
El-l'1l.-""'AREAlCOVl!!ftAQI':
E2 _ 2$'Il.-50'll0"R~l covERAai
E3 - 51'1!o-75'1l.AREAL COVEflAGf:
E4. 76%-'OO%-AA~l COYI!JIlAaE
, ,.....
,.AUllllAJUlIIlRISSIIII
-"'8l.flSliA,l.51.....,.U8AlU!a..o.o'....
=....OUEI'ICUSV'AQINIlo~F\J)
-
-'---'-
. ,....
'!Io...LBIZI...JULllIRlfi.$IN
'll.II,lIlSEM5IWoFlUB.foM_"'-'
='ll.OlIEACl.l!i YlMl""~fll)
..."HUSCOP.....lrMNM
~--
""'O:~...JUl_I9SIN
-'lIo~AARTEhlISU"OI.I"IUI
-'I'ioIi,i"51!lV>51~i,ia.o.i"i_'_
=-=1l.CAI.I.I~"'AAI!.RICloW.(U}
%CENCI<<U!!lllPlUl
!:!L %C\"IooClOOtlDACTY\.ONM__
_'ll.D,o.CTtl.ISQt.OtlIEIlATAM
B!...-%OACTY\.OCll!NlLN...ell'1'TlLMM_'"
'4Df'SMOOlUUSPllJ)
-1l.I~IXOLA"""'llJ)
-...lAHT........IPUl
---""OlU.LlS5TRICT"(U}
==,."...NlC.....W.Xlw.AilM_
__",p,l8PAUJtlNOr""~iJ)
_'II.PIlOBLE_5AIIlI0AILI)
____ ,"PIOOPSI51__CAIIlRAAlINlfOI.l"'IUl
""PTEI'\IOl1..UQlEDIT8Ct<(lJI......,,"'~
-...I'1VlOCALl.ONPVCNOSlACH'I"I..MM
'-'ll.OUI!f\CUlICH/IWIHII(lJ)
--'''OUEflCU6Ii'~NlNAllJ)
-'ll.Rlil.$COPAlllflU,t(lJ)
=:::%R"'""'-'CH@l.V1'JlUMAE:PEN9(Ul,..",_
~'ll.SPEfl~$",1Ul
_ __ %. STENOTAPMRUM UCLNl...TlJIolIU1"-'",
HL"'UAENAlOBI<T.lUl
--"L-.-%BARE~
_----2I!!L__
=13:ciANTS
""O"OI.OOlCD.,\,T"
8f~NfOlPO$lT'ON
-,o,QIJ"'Ttc"...lJ'<A
SOM-MJaCIIII'TlONI: lll'fR
Dl.pnt,...
OOllSAMPlti_3
D1l-&O . 6i:Jg.NDWIROCk
II RQCK"j!"USAL
0.0.2.0 .. ofJ2FINES"1oV
~.O"',O .u r.J;I S<lIo.\'l
'.0.1.0 A3 9AHt1Wmo:;KS
,.0.10-0 M 'f.!5ANO
SOIt.T""l
'(Ptft;O"(~
SOILO'STt.J'lBEONOT ""'T\S\"l
DEPfWMD WETLANDS oETER..NATION FiElD WORK SHEET
~:_ _._HI.a3.08 _ MCHAm. A, AAMMY ,,~!,se:'l' lNe Cl.IENl,Bf.A.CK' YUTCJ::I. TA.... 0111 "~OA BROADCASTINQ
~4C'mWiIiPWI!:P~M---.!!-,,_._~ HloPfRT'rl..EGAL,_~llDIllf'~_IIJlICRIWSItO!!-_
JUAIIDCTIONAL wrn.AND
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 159 of 191
OrrCHY~:
. O,~-"'!:Io_cu...CA1'5OOIWrQRlttDt'~ n<<v_..orWl'n..tHll,8U1'_.l\JIll/lIC1'1OW.~IliIl~""'lInlll'w:(]ljl)~1l'€QIIQHI#HJ""\/f:N)ClItIO~"A(l'IIVI:Q(N:._"""R
()l'lOMlICJ<lOllrLICTl(Iloj D1Y(:__J_C1'l~~K~AfnCT_~W.'Ul!Il SlOCIll.Cft8.....' i""lCJIl:lT'!."''''~1oI'l:Iot:ASlIl&Ot''''''1l;PC#MNllOlO''t7_
ft._HO MIAJIlIl"
JIIIA lO( 'l'Y NO flUHCTION..L
HIA XXVU-NO'- JUAlSD!t:TIONAL' lluR.....CF.W..TIIJ1
VEGETATION: WlTl.AlG "'0,"-1'40 _
CANOPY lUlU MlCAtmlSTRATA: C;IoWW:TIIlUHDYIOIiTATIl)NHMTOI"II'\.OlIIMOIIIOl'AlIIAl.COY1!IUCI
trA'4""C - II "" I'ACW lD-20"'OIlL
~~P'NUSELlOmVOffiSAl') ~ OUERCUSLAlflI'O\.-'AjI'W) 1\I:.J!'II> TAlOClDll.AlD'STICHllM\O)
cl ~B"''''''''IU..METT~FI -", ACEA_RlM;f'W1 'I\. PUI$!A'Al.lAITRI5,,-"'I~
='IIoM'l'l'lIG,",Ct""!AAIf') -'IIoClLTI$.....fV'GAT... -----:-'lI.ILEXCA$oSIIIIfIOI
'IIoSCHINJSTUI..'N1'~I'Ol.I\.I6(FI . "v. SALIKCAfl:OI....OIA(Oj
-"'lolI!lALEUCA~I<C'""Atl') =... '1'lA)l.IWUSC,lROLIN~f
-'%AC...CIA""-IRICU-IFORlo4EBlI"1 ~,~____.q.r..-
QROUNOCOVEA HllC..TORnMTAI 0HlMCT"I.....WIIET..TIOM""*T08ElIl'1lo0A1tO..CiI'dlULQOYI.RAGI
trill "'PAC - 1040'llo 'AC'W 20-311"" 011.
1R:Jl'4pIMJSELlonIV~FI -4-'" QUEFlOUSLAI,J\"OI.IA(f'W) .s!-~ ,...ltOD,UI.IDISTICHUMlO)
... "'SAaAlPIU..~TTO(f) _" 1oCl!1Il1llUl1llWW1 _'" PiIlI!l,..lY.I.USTflU8_.,(OI
~%""""IC"'CII'lI'!AA(f) 'M. COfU"J$~OI!loIINA!FWl ~v. 'LIo~I.;All:j"'IUI
:!I::'IoSCHlI'fJSTEllu,NfM'OLlI.JS(F) :![:.'llo AloI'H1CM..I.Al.....ENlIEIlGANlUloll.......1 ~"" BAUXC,t,RO\.IANAlOl
1:.!!....)l,UI!LAlEl.X:AaJlriQl,NolliJ1I\l'...(l") ... '" 8LroHI'tl.M&I"'IlJl"'D 'Mo ~RAX'NUSCAROLI"I"""I01
.f-.Jt..."'StA~,lIEPENS(f} -iI, cun'lLAA8l..n~' --'llo C5PHIoL.APfTI"!lJSOCCIDEm"'L'"(0)
%FlCASAlJIl;IA!FI 5-.1L'" CrII\'I'I!IoeM-AA'lJBlCACOI'FWI :::..::.,.. ANf<<)H,O,!JLAIlRllIO)
~1i:':'lIoW'l'RSINEGUl.o.Nl!HSI8__"""",.w(Fl 'Il. ClfISllMltJTt.qU(F'W1 _'II> ftAOCWACOI
'lloDIOSPVROS Y'RlJ'i'I/oUUll') 'll. COIrIlIIElINA r!1'W;I ML" Cl/d)'UMJAloIAIGENYIO)
-...IL.lQE.NlACLMtfl"l _.. CO/oIOCARPUSIIRICTUSCfW\ ~~ orc~NALATIFo~I"(OI
-'lloIlCACkAAlM'l,cu.lfClf'lUe:IlI~ _% COft~81581>(FWJ __,.,_% J:LliOC:Mf<AlSSPIOl
'f.ii""""'Il.AJClllOf'OC)ON~II\GINlCUSVl ~% C~IIlU9lKlt/l.ol.RIS(l'W1 _'Il. EFUOCAU..o,..S!>lI'lPEWOlOSI{OJFWI
!o,;a'lloA"IST'DASTfIlICT"(FJ l~_'" CVPeRlAOOOI'\o\.TUS(1'W) _'lI.fUlRENA&Cl....OOI!A(O)
'IoAltQN0PU9f1f'lI"l _'" OlCflFlOtoIIiNACOl.OIUoT"(FWI _% JIJI'<<:;USS'.(O)
'i='iO'Ilo~Sw.L""Ol.',",I'1 % 01001'" \lIRGltfANA IT'W1 Hll...% lWWIGIIIS"(O)
-...S'or:NS"'LCNI(fl ...IUSTACtMlGLAlCA(FW) 'lI.LVTHRlAIl!lPtol
--:-",Sl.t.EU"'f!') .. fll4"18TVL'SA~lf'W1 --..... NVUPIiIlEASPIOl
- %DlQIT"'R!ASEROTIN.I.l!') - ~-... OLEOITSIATPl"'CA'-ITHO/l!fWj ----:% YJH...Nllf.MlACAPlL.l.I.ARIS(Ol
-...DIO$OOI'I!...Illl.BIFIRAI'?1 ... >tl!UAIffiUISPIFW) -=---'" pmClMHEloIITOMOf<rjIOl
"'ER.o.GP.OSTSS'(f) ." l1YDROCOTVLESPIFW) ,.. POl'l'GONUMSpro)
,%lflUOIM'-IO\ERClI'OLIU$(I'J -~'IIo .....IlERICIMSPIl'Wl =::% PONr.DIIIIIACORO...T"'IO)
-...e-RYNOlI.....llAlDWltf,I('\ ...lfYItTlSALAT"'(fWl ___'M.PROSIRP,....c..o.SPIO)
-"IlP"'TOl'I'1.Al9PCF) '" JUN;:U5I.1.1.IUII""TUIlfWl 1'0 AtM>ICOSPORA(O\
-%Evr...IolIA$PIF'l ,. l.ACl*iOCA\.l.OHSPIS0G8UTTONl(O/FW~ ~ '% 5M>ITTAAl",~"N;IFOUA(OJ
-..FIWR'STYLI5l11'lofHloCEA(f1 v. LIJolDERf<lIAQIl,o.NDlnOA"'(PN} .__...:... sn""IAw'llNA(G)
-"M,I'OMESTIERASEGAEGAT.\l'1 'llo t.l!.l.AIfflolERAHAsr...TAIFW) % TIiAI.'A GeNCL.LATA lO)
-"'\.fXOf'ACAYOP...CAIF) '" P"'NCl,lUl'lfPENIIIFW) -1'0 TYPIiIl!ll'IOI
:"'=v.IMPER...T...CVl.'!jORlC",,,,'CCXJONI ~'lC. P"SPAL~LIOU.-AI'I'SlFW) -
..u.clflANTlEllC.l.fIOt.'ANA(f') 'Ilo "lll:l-EASPrwl
-..LVt,'lNlIoFI"RUGINII.o,(f} -", AI-la''''9P(FW)
'!o:"M~LCOt1''''COIl.CHORIFOLIA(1'] -." RLNlKvvnICIlLA1\J& [FWI
:::-:::'%IIMIUlNlIlSCAIO':N!l!f] '" 5Cl,l!l'llll/l'IFW)
ao.>>"'Plm",SPIFI _'M. SOLlllllGO(l'Wl
I.fi-,.PSVCHQTR'A$P.II'\ % SPARTI"""IiAKfRrIFW~
-v.RU!lUSSP(f1 '110 THEl'I'PTERI9Sl"CFw\SHELOf!RN
-=Y;S~USCANI\oeNSIS(Fj 'Ii:. wOOOWAJUll...VIRG'W1C...(FWtvCtiNFERN
ct ,.$tSDAHIASP(Ff ." X~RISCAROlINAN"'IFWl
'd-"'SETE",-'.(JINICUlAT.o,(f]
;r-ow,SllIIlLAASPlF)
20:a, "'" T~ICCOI!NOAONA1oDjCAf'I6IFl
}.iO 'll. vms ROTUNCI"OlJAlf)
-..WEOllIATRl.OlIJrof...
HVDROLOGIC INDICATORS:
SUilCAHOP\'
N'A ",,,..e
10.t0~p'NJSEl~OTT'VD~AtF)
~%SAllAl.P",,"loIITTOl't
:=::,. ',Mue...Cl!lIIlfEAAl!'l
'll.SCHIMJ$TI!....ll'~fOUUSIF)
'-'lloIllEl..Al.iIJC.llOUl~'-IEAYI...tf]
- -:-""SEflEJ<<lAfII'IN8['l
="::'lIoflCAS...URf:A(fJ
%tol'I'RSlNflJUAJlENSIS_.......,..I.qj
-'-"Dlo&I"Vfl()iVl~NIANA(f)
-'- .,,1!(,(lf.NlA CUMIN (1")
-v...CAClA"'U'lICl.lIFORIoIe8(1"1
QiWr"
xx ALGAUMTS
U---W"'TEAloIARKS
-.o.uf'WUCHS
__AAF'TI~OI'Ol:llRIS
SOILS: HyDRIC INDICATORS:
,_""..
Nll.\iclP...._
nT_D....SUrI.,.
F\D_
M-~lIP''''""-
...~ 5rMjI;.d l,.,.,.
AliOooooo.es.oc...
...71i1om1AA::llyMnoIllll
S.8llr<Iy~_
S5S;rdf_'
~~==.
~3=;:~
. .......
%.....8111A.M.-IBRISSIN
.--~BLflSEI\"'SlloIAIIUlJAf\JI_'04O
=.",OU!A0U6YIRl)'tMNA(1'IJ)
.--~"---
"'::"'OASTIlATA ~cnIlJlNl3\1'OlIJATIl)NK.-STQ"'0'4OM~D'Al!iAW.CO\l~
D .,.uPI.
."Al.II11...JUl.IIlAISlItN
=%lR.tlSlRA$MUluaAtuI_'...
'lI.O\Jf.flCIAiVIAGINANl'.[FUj
-=='f.RHU$COP""LUNIM lu)
. .
.
=.
."'W
OUEF1CU$i,.ALIA"OI,.IA(FW)
ACEI'lRUIlAUM:f"W)
ClLTlSL.Jo.EY'(>ATA
COI'IUfOEMINA(FWl
10.2/1'4 08l
~_10 '" TAllOOII.AlOI$T'CHlUMlO!
-,.iI'ER.SEAPAU.IJ,...a_../Ol
~J.L.'" UXCl\$6rtlE(Ol
",__'ll. SAUXCAAOl!JllUrlCOj
% FIW(I~USCAI'IOlINlAHAlO)
-..... C~PH,I,lANllfUSOCCloeNTAlISlo]
0l!J~_~-,-~.~'-
..~~
lD-""uPL
""ALIIlZl"'JUl.IIFlIIS'N
-'II.IUolIA08I"ARTEMIS\II'OU"'(U)
='II....lioiM.......Fil&ll\llI_.-.
_'%CAI.LICAR...........IIICNj...M
...ClN:lNlU8Sl"lUl
-,.,.C:VNOQONDACTYl.OIolIUI_
= v. DACTYl.11I OtOW.AA.TA(UI
~.___'lI.DACTVl.OCTlNI.AlAI!O'I'PTIUMfIJI_
ow, DESWODlUM SI'(U)
-%'LEltI3lA8RA1U)
-,%LANT"""'iFlJ!
=%OXIILISSTlIIlClAM
_'_ %p",NC!Mw.xu..MM_
lIo"...SI'''LUMHOTATl.IOl(lJ)
-'lI.I'ILOBl!PHlSIIIGlOfIllUl
=iI,ptT"lOPSIIi...._~I\IlMlNFOlIA(UI
_,._%Pt&RIDIWOI,.IDlt$c;H(lJlwa._
_lIoPTEAOCAU-ONP'rCNOSTACH"l'l.IlIU)
_"'~IIlCU8~I(UI
'M.OUiiReU$vII'lBltoW<lA(Ul
=.,.AHlJ5COP...U.INlMM
'%RH'rNCtELYmUMREPl!NSIUl--._
~%SI'IlIll......eocE~.(U)
_.._v.9TlitfOT..".HItUlol8Ee~TIM(U)',_''''
.!:!!...lIoURE....109,l,T...M
.:!.L-'%8AAEGROOJCl
~,---_.
YES M.. NO
~M'
.._..-~----
ADVEmlTOUS llOOTS
--.x-HVPEI\TROPHlC~l"'-'CILS
1I!!......-1lCTIV! ClVPAE9S K...es
FLOWC_lS
SURF...CEw...n;R...lIlfSl!r-IT
AOlJ/lt'C~IVEIlWOt'lTS
ORII'TL'~S
, .'YEGETAT'IlTUS$OCl(~KS
ELI':\lATEOUCI-iE'-I~INI'-S
AQU"'T'CPIJlNTS
IllJl.l,l;llNG
~OLOOlCllAT'"
Sl'DlMlwrOB"OSITJON
,o,ou"TICFAlJN,I,
YES';~ NO
8OI-DlDCIIPl'IOMI"""
DEPTH;1Jt
SOI~!I.I.Wl.E r1
05.0.0 01 lEAFlmlm
OD.2.$ .611SANO
:5 511 ~ """1I\IK:811 s",M)
~1tLESM'SIoNJ
5.0-1UI ~~ lMTRlX:1tI41iiA~
~TTI.ES;It.IS"''<<I
SOIlSll.\PlEf'2
5.(1.0 ()I LEA' LITTEll
O_IHO ... 8I1S.I.ND
Y.!fSNClS~S
E MATRllt:emSA~
M:lTTLESllI2SAND
U MATfUX:612SAND
lo()TTl.U; M SAND
.....-'-,
.-
c.ttllll:
0-.1'1:
_M_
YES IfO ~a'~......~orl...omr""Q"..._e.__
11:9 = 1'O=""".I'M1l'lI'ic:kwlltl.~"""'''''''lt'Ol_ell''o"""",CI'o,,"''2a'IO..~,,,_'2.Ql_'''
VTIe __ 1lO_I_Ql"'...._"'5a'_...''"'''''...-,~..Q"oo.,.
:: -- ::g-~ftl..:;~=~.."''''''',,.'''.._"..'''''..t~_~,..,,'''''t'''~,.odlo'~''''n''''''
,ES t;O~,.. or ma.. ,~.1. """,>Jtn\JIJ< .."....."'........I..nti..........
'rU NO-2.1_\fIlIlIO'1~'oI'lw...,t...
vtS NO-=.!IIrf'Id"'...~"""..60%a'.......q!.IAjoO...,'r.lno!...lU1...
~: fr ::;:=:';::n.:.o:.:'.~~'~::.:~.l~.:~n= &. r.. ..~, ..M'..._mcm....2
YES f;O _lIyer._14.lho:U..~idn6''''.url..,I..__3a'..lIlctnnll'''_.70'llol*lC'..e_''''_..-
't'fS 1;Q_"",yeamrlllll..n.:tToo;"wOKfD""'Q''''''raol.l.yer~_nrrQlIlw.",,_
11:& 1;()_""'."1I16'fick~.*,_""r-6D11o"'rno"CIllU""2"'1e..,~";~IO.ol""-
'Ie' ttO___on~~o'i.....n""_,.",,,,,,,,""'j""'6.1_1,,,,,,,,""n_'.';W'4lI.II~........om,,,.lo"...
velll\.lL..NO_",REIU..EXTlNTOBl.lJPL;t.,.,n:.oiIf.:"",,"'<>lI\'
YES .!!.... rc__...REAlEXTENTORl.l'ACWu80'4UPl..NOI_....~IoCI
'rl!S __ tlO.!!_""./CXSOILS
YiSU f-O ~*,1Il"""1Il:1OIW.
YES --. ooil"
1!<_ngW_.I'>...,""~...,_Sti....."''''''*_...pm....,._b'''''''''_~_
ISOUTED YEtI ND1QLN"
MO~",'"
SOILTYPI:
;~,~O:(Hl
Sf A TE OF FL: PEP SFWUD
WETUND: WETLAND ftS ~ NO
JURISDICTION"'L
PET.~~.t...~._,P.~~"!iR~_,,,.,. _ """"";.,_,,",,,..,,,,:'t,,',...r
SURFAC1; WATM~
JURISDICTIONAL YEt NO _NJ"'~____
DETI!'RMINAT1ON ",:,,_~MC::,:~~:;""~"''''''''i'_~.,.,...
tDlDNAlltrFO,
exOTIC IN"ISTATDN L!VI!I.lI
EO.O'll....RULCOVI!RAOIi
Ell. 1"-ZI"ARUL COveRAG~
E2 . 2....50"10 AREAL COV!RAOE
1:3. ~1"," 75% "'REAL COveR"'GE
E. . 7&lIoo 100'% AREAL COY2RA<iE
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 160 of 191
Sample Point 1
74082128145
Black & Veatch Tampa 011; Renda Broadcasting
USACOE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD SHEETS
Page
F';~r..ci Name:~BI~ck& Veatch Tampao"i'1"'
Sample Point Number: 1
Investigators: MICHAEL R. RAMSEY, RAMSEY INC.
Yes Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
. ,No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
~. No,.. ~S~~Il~!;.a poten.!i.~I"P.':oblemA!e.a2 .._. .
VEGETATION
No. Scientific Name Strata Indicator Percent DOrnlnant
_ ___ ..___..... . ._~. .._~__Slelus co.v~~.Specles
IT i Sp'ERMAGOCE F.!:-2~IDANA _~_~~~"_ 'H.erb ..J UPL ..i~-' '~-.~
Ul URENA LOBATA ...__..._~_....__iHerb ; FA_CU I J.OO I Yes .
~ANDROPOGONVIRGINICUS .~ . Herb i FAC- ! 15.00. i Yes
~ 4! VI TIS ROTUNDIFOLlA === ~__"":_' He~.~~ I 7.001.. Yes-_
L__!~" ---- ---- - ! ..---- !--==-.
,.. l~_ ~... .. ! --.l.... ..L... L-----..J
~--...----...~=.-- !'_ -I- '-'-L_=:-~l':- _.-J
i1---- __~ _---L--I_.__l_=~_____.....:._
t .~. ----- -~ -----~-r__=..b .' : .... - _u_j_-=-_ ..J
Date: 10/07/2008
County: Collier
Roll No: 7408212 I
Lat./Long.:
North: 25.39' 48"
West: 80.57' 17"
- -=-,..0- ...._._.".,=;,~.
Time:
State: FL
Photo No:
Datum: NAD83
I:
I: Total Number of Species: 4 Total Dominants:
:; Percent of Dominants that are Wetlend Species: 50/20: 50.00
!. Prevalence Index: 3.58
4
FAC(mlnus)- applied: 25.00
FAG Neutral: No
"
'-",.-~
~--_.~
I:
....-'1
HYDROLOGY
i! Recorded Data:
I Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
Other
X No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations;
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water In Pit:
Depth to Saturated Soil:
(in.)
(in.)
(in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_. Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
._~ Sediment Deposits
__ Drainage Pat1erns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Water-Stained Leaves I
Local Soil Survey Data
FAG-Neutral Test
,"_= Ot~~.LExe~n in ~.!ma~kf!!~~
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 161 of 191
Sample Point 1
74082128145
Black & Veetch Tampe 011; Renda Broadcasting
USACOE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD SHEETS
Page 2
SOILS
Map Unit Name: #2tB'OCAClISTURBED
(Series and Phase):
. Ta~~n_()my (~u~~p):
Profile Description:
Deptii-- 1--MatrlxcoTor, Texture, Concretions, Redox Feature
',(inches) Hz I. (Munsell Moist) I . Structure i Abundance/Contrast
I~~.o-ifo~ -L _~3.-=:__ __ -~a~d/SiOriey--=-=-_ .:---C--
._6.0 f!.OQ..._A_ J~Y _--" ~ __ __ Sand ______ +- - - -- ~--I,i
I I I __'_"~I
r ~,,:-~,[-=-i'I- .'.' - ~-'~~0~-- . i.- . -~,'
.' .~. ~-------r'---
Hydnc SOlllnCllcators:
, Histosol Concretions
,I --Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
'i -SulfidiC Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
j' =~Aqulc Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
'i _ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
,I _ _ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Organic Pan
['_'"'=~_~,=~~ '. _000 IE,.,. '"_'01 .~
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Ii N~ Hydrophyti~ Vegetation presen!'? --~ . No I~ ihisSa~pling PoinlWrthin ; Wetland? -- .-- ~
,i _!':Io. Wetl~nd Hydrology Present? !'!Q...ls this Sampling Point a Waters of the US? I'
1 .J'-IQ... Hydroc SOils Present? ..IIIIL Have the determination results been overridden by the user? :1
L.c=:~~--=-.c=--=_=-c---=-=---=-=-~~='=c~~~~~~~-' .~
Drainage Class:
Field Observations
_ C..onflrm~apped!)'pe? No_
----- -. ----;'
, l1edox Color-- --'!'
.l~nsell Moist) ~I
REMARKS
=.--===--=-__-=__c-~=_==_. -. ,I
1
I]
"
I'
"
'--==---::
Wetland
Yes
X No
WoUS
Yes
X No
4
3.58
Species Richness
Prevalence Index
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 162 of 191
Sample Point 2
419
Black &. Veatch Tampa 011; Renda Broadcasting
USACOE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD SHEETS
Page 3
p;ojectNi';;~: Black'"&'VealchTa;;'pa011
Sample Point Number: 2
Investigators: MICHAEL R. RAMSEY, RAMSEY INC.
: Yes Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
"riJc)ls the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
,>lJJ1,c:~:~~~a pc~enti~,P~~~~rea?~~~,_
VEGETATION
~,._~_.c..-~_~~_~~~
Date: 10/07/2008
County: Collier
Roll No: 419
Lat.iLong.:
North: 25. 39' 48"
West: 80.57' 17"
--~Time:' ~."'-----
State: FL
Photo No:
Datum: NAD83
,
I No. Scientific Name
!1,"PINUS El.:LIOTrIl -
i-- :2 i'SABAL PALMETTO
1--31 P1i1/uS''EWOTIII
ju--4-is'ABAL PALMETTO
I 5 I iLEX CASSINE
~SPERMACOCE FLoRI5Aw;----
'--7 !'pHYLA NODIFLORA----.
.- 87Ai=liSTIM STRiCTA"--
gl'tOXICO-I5ENDRON'RiibTCAJ'iS-
i__10TVITi$ROT(J~~OLlA --==--
11 SMILAX BONA-NOX
Herb
,Herb
Shrub
Shrub
------Herb'
Herb
Herb
- '---,- Herb
-- '--'Herb
iHerb
Strata 'Indlcaior Percent Domlnani
Status Cover Species . J
i FACW 35.00 Yes
FAC 2.00 No
! FACW 15.00 Yes
, FAC 2.00 No
F ACW U 2:Cio"r" No
UPL 25.00 Yes
I FACW 25.00 Yes
i FAC. 25.00 Yes
,_. F~.<2.. .. __.25.0o.l.._Yes J
. FAC 7.00 I No
Herb - ., FAG- -,- 200! No- ,
__ .. _,;" I . ---r -- .
1-------L-~+-
1---'--- .-- ~
1-
,
J__
':~~~--.---------'----- .
': Total Number of Species: 11 Total Dominants: 6
! I Percent of Dominants that are Wetland Species: 50/20: 83.30
!! Prevalence Index: 2.84
FAC(mlnus)- applied:
FAG Neutral:
66.70
Yes
HYDROLOGY
,: Recorded Data:
I' Stream, Lake. or Tide Gauge
I ~ Aerial Photographs
" Other
" X No Recorded Data Available
" Field Observations:
I Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water In PIt:
Depth to Saturated Soli:
(in.)
(In.)
(In.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
_ m _ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
_____ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Water,Stained Leaves
)( Local Soil Survey Data
_..1< _ FAC-Neutral Test
_~~.~_0her (~)(Plain in Rel11~~s.L~~:"
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 16301191
Sample Point 2
419
Black & Veatch Tampa 011; Renda Broadcasting
USACOE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD SHEETS
Paga 4
SOILS
. Map UnltN~me:"- #ii~BOcA
(Series and Phase):
'. Taxonomy (Subgroup):
iproiile Descripllon-:-----
.: - DePtilj ---1 .- 'Matrix'Color ~ Texture, Concretions,m.----i--Redox Feature
, (inches) , Hz : (Munsell Moist), ____Structure _.__~~n.P_anc~.LContr~t
:io.O~2:s-A'} .. 10YR6Il - ..2::.._sana-- .
~ 2.S-=5'FfA I - 10YR6Ij-- -Sand--n--- (-WYRBI2
I 5~E I 10YR814 sandl_~-==___-~__L_jjjY~~=~
[!~ ! ..~ -~+ .. ~-==~~- ~I .......... - ..
'I. _-+_'---_ I
~-j-L--u---------L --- --=-~-J
'r------r~-I----j-----
ii 1__ ~ ,.---------r-----..
il! HYo.nc SOIl n Icators:
I Histosol
I. ---::::::Histic Epipedon
: Sunidic Odor
I' = Aquic Moisture Regime
il Reducing Conditions
Ii .....:= GI~yed or Low-Chroma Colors
! NRCS Field Indicators: S6 Stripped Matrix
II
I. ___~_.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
~. Hyd-rophyliC V~g;;;~iion Pre~~~t?-' Yes. Is this Sampling POini-W;\hin a Wetla~d?- -~li
I -:""Ves Wetland Hydrology Present? NO'- Is this Sampling Point a Waters of the US? ii
Ii . Yes HYd~iC ~oil~-Pres::t?~~~_=~-.f'JQ......I-1.~ve the determination results been overridden by the user? I:
Drainage Class:
Field Observations
_ Conli':'!.' M~p~ .:r~~_~. No_
~edox CoTor --..
I (Munsell Moist)
~~..
----=~ --. "---I
i
-- .-+------1
ii
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
- Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- -.. Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Solis List
Organic Pan
--'5- Other (Explain in Remarks)
REMARKS
r-~--=====--~-'-'
I
!i
Wetland
X Yes
No
WoUS
Yes
X No
11
2.84
Species Richness
Prevaience Index
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 164 of 191
Sample Point 3
740 310
Black & Veatch Tampa 011; Renda Broadcasting
USACOE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD SHEETS
Page 5
Project Name: Black,rlJeatchTampaoi i
Sample Point Number: 3
Investigators: MICHAEL R. RAMSEY, RAMSEY INC.
Yes Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
-No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
NO_-'S_ ~e_site a p,"~!,!iaIP:oblemA~~?__
VEGETATION
Date: 10/07i200a---
County: Collier
Roll No: 740310
Lat./Long.:
North: 25' 39' 48"
West: 80'57' 17"
rrme:
State: FL
Photo No:
Datum: NAD83
No. Scientific Name Strata Indicator Percent Dominant
___ _ ~___--~ ~tu~over . Specles~
-i T SPERMACOCEFLORIDA~ ---__~. 'Herb' JUf'Lf - -25.00.' Yes
Q . ANDROPOGON VIRGINICUS -=-=--- __ _ _ Herb ___iEAC------L__ 25.00 l._.}'~s-----c
Q! ~~JL~N~~~~~~~ ---=-- ------ - - .~:~ -1~~2VJ~~~- ~~S..,.~
I '5' TOXICODENDRON RADICANS----=::-:---=-=__=--...Herb ":'!.FAC' --:-25.-00 j 'YeS I
i- 6 vrfls ROTUN~iFOU~- ._~~--W'AC-------+- ., _ 7.00 .,.~ -~
L_ -~- ---.-- ---- ~-.--. ---1----- --L.., -t----~ !---- .-----i
l_.~~-" ~:~=- -~ ~~ __ - '._ _~_: ~_.L. .===-i --~-
, , I
~---=-+---=;.- -~-=t-:="... i . .--1
un --=--=-=____ r--~:~~!--r=--- -I ..- _~
--~l
I
Total Number of Species: 6 Total Dominants:
Percent of Dominants that are Wetland Species: 50/20: 75.00
Prevalence Index: 3.23
I
I
I,
_~_~~~- ~~,.i
4
FAC(mlnus)- appiied:
FAC Neutral:
50.00
TBD
-.'---' -'-----
__0"0 .~_. ---- '._- -----.--.--... -~----
H'[DROL()GY ~~~~_'_____~__
'! Recorded Data:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
j. ~ Other
i, ~ No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
Depth to Saturated Soil:
(in.)
(in.)
(in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: -l
Primary Indicators: i
Inundated
__ Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches II
Water-Stained Leaves "
Local Soil Survey Data .1
FAC-Neutral Test
____~~Other_LElPlail1Jn Remark~L,"_,_
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 165 of 191
Sample Point 3
740 310
SOILS
-,,-::--- ,--_._._".:.._,-,._.,--,-.,-~.,.....
Map Unit Name: Drainage Class:
(Series and Phase): Field Observations
_ Taxonomy (Subgroup): . __~9nfirITl Mallpe~ype? N~~ Ii
,Profile De~CriPtiOn:----~-~' __~ _ . .____ . __ . ~_-=J
, -Dept-h - . r '-r-;,;!i!ri,,'color' Texture, Concretions, 'Redox Feature I Redox Color
, (inches) i H~ , (Munsell Moist) I Structure I Abundance/Contrast I (Munsell Moist) ,
,-----0:0::2.6---;P;-'I '--jO)'1'\4/2 T'~ salid - -~-- ,-- - ---, - ~i
1~4Q---t-A-,'~5/:r--T ----saiid ~-- ---j- -- --- '--- ~i
14.O-7lJiA- T~513~ --- Sand/Stoney - T- -- - -----1.
1'-70-10.01 A-~~-' --- ------sana- ~~ =::.::-===-:~ _~ "
I~.I-i .. .. -f: ... - -! ........-! ........ .~
i,~f-=--=--T~=----~~~-------+- ~"':"=----=-~~~i
,: Histosol Concretions Ii
!- "'-Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils :
j' =SulfidiC Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils II
II Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List !
II =Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List 11
'I _ Gleyed or Low~Chroma Coiors Organic Pan
ii NRCS Field Indicators: _
Ii -
!I=~~~=-___=_=--=-- -.~==-~----:::c---,----,----==-----=-"--
WETLAND DETERMINATION
II"N~. Hyd;ophyliC Vegetation Present?
II ==NCl_ Wetiand Hydrology Present?
I, ....!'12..... Hydric Solis Present?
~-- -- -... ---=--'~-~~_.
Black & Veatch Tampa 011; Renda Broadcasting
USACOE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD SHEETS
Page 6
._ Other (Explain in Remarks)
i:
,
,I
--=-:..:.1
No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? -~:
-Nclls this Sampling Point a Waters of the US? I,
~ Have the determination results been overridden by the user? I:
~_ _~_.~=-------_~-::::::.__---=---=====-- .-----=----=-..;..::~~__ __~-.=.J
REMARKS
'~
Wetland
Yes
X No
WoUS
Yes
X No
6
3.23
Species Richness
Prevalence Index
Agenda Item NO.7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 166 of 191
624
Black & Veatch Tampe 011; Renda Broadcasting
USACOE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD SHEETS
Page 7
Sample Point 4
p;ol~"t Name:' Black & Veatch Tampa 011
Sample Point Number: 4
Investigators: MICHAEL R. RAMSEY, RAMSEY INC.
Yes Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
,'No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
[f NQ".-',-~sl~:~tea POte~t~~I_~roblem..!-re,,? ~~.
VEGETATION
Date: 10/07/2008
County: Collier
Roll No: 624
Lat./Long.:
North: 25039' 48"
West: 80057'17"
Time:
State: Fl
Photo No:
Datum: NAD83
I No. Scientific Name
L- -_____ ._-~ - _~_:;:..;..:..:::~
"1 TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
1 ~US ElLlOTTII - ~-~---
I '3 SABAL PALMETTO
I~ 4- TAXODIUM DISTICHUM
1-5 ' flEXCASSINE~-
r-6 ' pfNLTSElLlOTTiI~-
~ 7 SPERMACbcEFlOR-iDANA
, 8 -'-PHYlA-NODiFL~-
9 : ARlsmjA STRICTA
10 -SMILAX BONA--:NOX--
1 f~ObENDRON R-ADICANS- .
12--;VITIS I'jOTONtJIFOLlA
Strata Indicator Percent 'Dominant'l
Status Cover Species [
: Herb ,OBl ,__.12~_ N~
_ _ =--=Her~JFACW;. 3.500___ Yes I
I Herb FAC . 200 No~
'--;Shrub 'OBl -r--7:QO----y".--
c-Herb ~ FACW.i-----iiio -~o
--------- -- 'Shrub 'FACW ~-- 15.00---T---yes---'-
'Heiii~IJPL ~25.00 ----yes
~Ej~______fj,CW--l_____~o ~~~~- [
,H~~b~c;= 25cOO .n__Ye~_.J
~b----"'I\C____ _.._.. ~QQ L~"--_!
Herb FAC '25.00 Yes
Herb-FAC--;-- 7,00 No- ,
_.._--_...._--~-----~---
~-1
...---:--- --I
'r--~
-----i
Total Number of Species: 12 Total Dominants: 7
Percent of Dominants that are Wetland Species: 50/20: 85.'70
Prevalence Index: 2.60
FAC(minus)- applied:
FAC Neutral:
71.40
Yes
HYDROLOGY
I'~--'
i Recorded Data:
': Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
[ _ Aerial Photographs
I Other
,[ x No Recorded Data Available
[1--
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water in Pit:
Depth to Saturated Soil:
(in.)
(in.)
(in.)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
_ _ __ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
____ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
._._._ local Soil Survey Data
X FAC-Neutral Test
J)ther (Ex~a.i~I~I2~lT1arks)
. \
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 167 of 191
Sample Point 4
Black & Veatch Tampa 011; Renda Broadcasting
USACOE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD SHEETS
Page 8
624
SOILS
Map U'~it Nam~:'iii4~PINEDA(H) AND 112(SOCA
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Proiii96e!lCriptlon:~'
, DePth--' - Matrix Color Texture, Concretions, . Redox Feature -,- Rl;doX'Colo,---':
(inches) , Hz , (Munsell Moist) , Structure i Abl!ndanCe/Contr~iMunsell MOist). _
. -O~(jC2:S!A-- IOVRS/1 '-Si;nd '
i.S-s:or-E ------wYReiil Sand --. i-------wYiis/2' --'
-S.0-11.01 E--:-WVRai4'---;- .---saiid-- _.~=_~~~ _-==-:- - ,_::--nNRs/2 --!
i~=- ' --: '_' _-~~. . i-~~~==~ :~==--_-__~ ==~:,~:
" .- __1- r~~~--=-------- ' ---i- ---~I
:~- -----!-===--=----:-~-~-~:ll:~=------ Ii -----=-- __-~~~:Iil'
.~_."; --T- -.--t--- , . '
:: Hydnc &llllndtcators: 'I
Histosol Concretions
I, . -~Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer In Sandy Soils ,I
Ii .- Su~idic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils I
,i - Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List !,
-'~Reducing Conditions X Listed on Nationai Hydric Soils List
I; ------:- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Organic Pan
.I NRCS Field Indicators: S~ Stripped Matrix
Drainage Class:
Field ObselVations
Co~fi!rl2 Mappe~~7No
.ll.. Other (Explain in Remarks)
!~~-::--
---~_.'---"-
:1
I!
--"--~"-'---:!i
WETLAND DETERMINATION
r=je~~HYdrophytlc Vegetati~~'P~~~~nt? ~-Y~ls this S~;:;;pli~g Point Within a Wetland?'l
I' __Yes Wetland Hydrology p;esent? ,No__ls this Sampling Point a Waters of the US? 'I
II .. Ye,,- _HYdric SOils Present._.NQ-- Have the de~~_mination results been overridden by the us.':':? Ji
REMARKS
rr==--- --~-
----~.~.- ....-.-- -~-_.-
--~--
---,1
I'
,I
II
II
____'-'=cc=:c.c-...-=-==,'=..".-cc-oc---=--==-I
Wetland
X Yes
No
WOUS
Yes
X No
12
2.60
Species Richness
Prevalence Index
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
AERIAL FLUCFCSI VEGETATION MAP
~. ," .
PROJECT: BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011
RENDA B ADCASTIN CORP.
Figure 5. Aerial I FLUCFCSI Vegetation Map;
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011, 5860 Crews Road, PID 00405160008,
See 08, Twn 50, Rge 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
Ramsev Inc.
Envlronmenial Consulting
2631 4th St. NW
~rl~t:..~'&6~4120
- (
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
FLUCFCSI VEGETATION MAP
Ba 624
PINE CYPRESS PALM
DEP/SFWMD .JURIS. WETLAND
USACOE .JURIS. WETLAND
#1 3.73 AC
#2 0.06 AC
TOTAL 3.79 AC
m:m 740 310
ItlW DISTURBED LAND /
GRASS PRAIRIE
DEP/SFWMD UPLAND
USACOE ULAND I
#30.15 AC
O 7408212
DIST LAND /
COM ATION TOWERS
DEP/ MD UPLAND
USA ULAND
#4 0.38 AC
~ 7408145
L:;:;.::::I DISTURBED LAND /
ACCESS DRIVEWAY
DEP/SFWMD UPLAND
USACOE ULAND
#5 0.22 AC
419
~ OTHER PINE
~ DEP/SFWMD UPLAND
USACOE .JURIS. WETLAND
#6 0.15 AC
#7 0.08 AC
TOTAL 0.23 AC
. BUILDING
. ELECTIRICAL UTILITY
. TOWER
40 0
I
40 80 120 Feet
LA K & VEATCH TAMPA 011
Figure 4. FLUCFCSI Vegetation Map;
330 FT
-..~
\
:x
y
I
...
...
CI
M -
'" -
I
I
J'"
. ~
4..
.
I
J
--Ti'
u _~-J _
f"'!':.?< 'C
10-~
~~~-""""'Y 'C::-..-........~?J. 'lii
~ ~'BS:::~ ~-........-.....::: y. ,,,"
~""~,,"'" ~;:.)<
A- "- ~~ .?<:> ex
:X~~ ~-,./
~0 ",,",, ~-.....:::
,"J~ '~~
I Ii i [ I~~ ~I I'~~ I~( I i II II i 111 1
-:><
><
CREWS RQ4_Q.1t9W
+.
s
BLACK & VEATCH TAMPA 011, 5860 Crews Road, PID 00405160008,
Sec 08, Twn 50, Rge 26, totaling approx. 4.77 acres.
Ramsev Inc.
Envlronmen'tal Consulting
2631 4th St. NW
~rl!::4~'&6~120
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 170 of 191
Due Diligence
Inspection Report
r"'''''.,f ~ ';"
, , [",...." ' " ., "}'",,,
_~ ,;.1!:.~'d~i~._ff.'~\.~'J:,,!!J:'~:"~'i\;. "'~
, - ,.":l<~-.\ '.' ,; ;;. .'", ~ J'~ ~'''''
Naples, FL
FL-4031
Presented to:
Jerry Heckerman CE, Renda Broadcasting of SW
Florida
10915 K-Nine Drive
Bonita Springs. FL 34135
r.r=! StruebJral
EtJ ~~~ents
1617 Pearl, Unit A I Boulder, CO I (aoo) 584.&839
November 17. 2009
Completed by:
Wes Culver
Field Engineer Manager
Structural Components, LLC
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 171 of 191
DUE DILIGENCE INSPECTION
Naples, FL
Technical Information:
Site Location:
5860 Crews Road
Naples, FL 33942
Coordinates:
Latitude:
Longitude:
N 26.1258330
W -81.7213890
Structure:
Support Type:
Connection Type:
Height:
Face Width:
Guyed
All-Weld
448 fl.
57" C-C
Manufacturer:
ERI
Design:
Unknown
InsDection Details:
Dates of Inspection:
August 19th, 2009
November 18th, 2009
Inspected By:
Ryan Beach, Field Eng., Structural Components LLC
Darryl Elliot, C.E., Global Broadcast Services
InSDected in Accordance With:
Collier County, FL Guyed Tower 2 Year Inspection Requirements
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 172 of 191
Introduction
At the request of Renda Broadcasting, Structural Components. LLC and Global Broadcast Services have
completed an acceptance site review of this tower in conformance wrth Collier County's Tower Inspection
Requirements.
The scope of work included but not limited to the visual inspection of the structural members and
connections, in addition to the appurtenances and transmission lines. The tensions and alignment of the
tower were measured in accordance with TIA-222-G Annex J "Maintenance and Condition Assessment".
Measurements of the tower alignment and guy tensions can be found attached.
Structural Components has also created a 'Priority Rating System and Rust Classification' to assign a
value to the condition and priority, which needs to be addressed. This is to help the Owner allocate funds
and resources to address maintenance issues now and/or in the future. A full list and description of these
ratings can be found in the section entitled .Priority Rating System and Rust Classification" sheet,
followed with an overall summary of the tower with recommendations.
It is important to note that this report does not comment on the structural adequacy of the tower, only its
physical condition that can be reasonably ascertained by visual inspection.
For a list of all specific work preformed while on site. please refer to the Collier County, FL Guyed Tower
Inspection Requirements.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 173 of 191
Priority Rating System and Rust Classification
A priority is placed on each conclusion or recommendation made in this report to help the Owner in
allocating funds for remedial work or future attention.
Conclusions and recommendations are assigned a priority rating of A, B, C, 0, or E. These ratings are
related to safety, structurai integrity, system performance, and proper maintenance of the tower and
attachments.
Priortties are assigned based on safety standards as well as the experience and knowledge of our
engineering staff. In all cases, safety is of paramount importance.
Priority categories are defined as follows:
Priority A - Safety Criteria:
This includes items or faults which, if not corrected, may lead to collapse or failure of the structural system
or antenna or pose a threat to the safety of personnel that might be on the site.
Priority B - Performance Criteria:
This includes items or faults which have or will impact on the quality of transmission signals received or
transmitted. These faults are generally related to faults in antennas and transmission lines. their
mounting, connectors, and grounding.
Priority C - Maintenance Criteria:
This includes items or faults which do not have an immediate effect on the tower but rather items and
faults that, if not corrected. will in time shorten the service life of the tower or its elements.
Priority D - Future Attention:
This includes items or faults which require either attention by a Professional Engineer qualified to work
with Communication Structures or attention on a regular basis by qualified tower inspection personnel.
Priority E - Housekeeping Criteria
This includes items or faults related to ease of access to the tower, the ladder condition, anti-ciimb
condition, fencing. gates. locks, access roads, etc.
RUST CLASSIFICATION:
Levell
Initiai surface rusting that can be easily removed (Priority C)
Levell!
Initiai surface rusting that cannot be easily removed by sanding (Priority C)
Surface rusting with initial pitting of steel (Priority A)
Significant rusting of steel with up to 10% area of steel loss (Priority A)
Level III
Level IV
Level V
Significant rusting of steel with area of steel loss exceeding 10% (no longer safe to climb
Pnonty A+) I
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 174 of 191
Overall Summary and Recommendations
During our site visit, we noted the following deficiencies. Following each deficiency is a recommendation
for the remedial action to bring the tower into compliance:
Item Priority A - Safety Criteria
No problems noted
Item Priority B - Performance Criteria Section
No problems noted
Priority C - Maintenance Criteria
No problems noted
Item Priority D - Future Attention
L:- No probiems noted
Item Priority E - Housekeeping Criteria
No problems noted
Recommendations
Recommendations
Recommendations
Recommendations
Recommendations
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 175 of 191
Maintenance and Condition Assessment
A. Structure Condition Conditions/Notes
1 Damaged members (legs and bracing) No bent or damaged members were found
durina insoection.
No loose members were found during
2 Loose members inspection. Bolts were checked visually on entire
tower and soot-checked with wrench.
3 Missing members No problems noted
4 Loose andlor missing bolts/nut locking device No problems noted
5 Visible cracks in welded connections No problems noted
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 176 of 191
B. Finish Conditions/Notes
1 Paint and/or galvanizing No problems noted
Levell rust on some structural members
(approximately 3%-5%). This will not affect
Rust and/or corrosion condition including structure condition, but should be monitored. If
2 rusting increases it should be removed with a
mounts and accessories wire brush or similar and affected areas should
be cold-galvanized with a minimum of (2) coats
of 95% ZRC.
3 FAA or ICAO color marking conditions No problems noted
4 Water collection in members (to be remedied, No problems noted
e.g., unplug drain holes, etc.
I
I
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 177 of 191
c. Lighting Conditions/Notes
1 Conduit, junction boxes, and fasteners No problems noted
(weather-tight and secure)
2 Drain and vent openings (unobstructed) No problems noted
3 Wiring condition All cables are secure and showing no signs of
deterioration.
4 Light lenses No problems noted
5 Bulb condition No problems noted
Strobe lighting was inspected and appears to be
6 Controllers (functioning) functioning at the proper intensity for day and
niaht modes.
a. Flasher No problems noted
b. Photo control No problems noted
c. Alarms ------.---- No problems noted
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 178 of 191
D. Grounding Conditions/Notes
1 I Connections All connections and Cad Welds were found to
be in Qood condition.
2 I Corrosion No problems noted
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 179 of 191
E. Antennas and Lines ConditionslNotes
1 Antenna Condition No problems noted
2 Mount and/or ice shield condttion (bent/loose, No problems noted
and/or missino members)
3 Feed line condition No problems noted
4 Hanger condttion (snap-ins, bolt on, kellum No problems noted
orips, etc.)
5 Secured to structu re All antennas, mounts and coax lines were found
to be orooerlv secured to structure.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13. 2010
Page 180 of 191
F. Other Appurtenances
(walkways, platforms, sensors, Conditions/Notes
floodlights, etc.)
1 I Condition No problems noted
2 I Secured to structure No problems noted
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 181 of 191
G. Insulator Condition Conditions/Notes
,
1 Cracking and chipping No insulators present.
2 Cleanliness of insulators
3 Spark gaps set properly
4 Isolation transformer condition
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 182 of 191
H. Guys Conditions/Notes
1 Strand condition (corrosion, breaks, nicks. No problems noted
kinks. etc.)
2 Guy hardware condition No problems noted
a. Tumbuckles or equivalent No problems noted
(secure and properly applied)
b. Cable thimbles properly in place (if required) No problems noted
c. Service sleeves properly in place (if No problems noted
required)
d. Cable connectors (end fittings) No problems noted
(i) Cable clamps applied properly and No problems noted
bolts tiqht
(ii) Wire serving properly applied No problems noted
(iii) No signs of slippage or damaged No problems noted
strands
(iv) Prefonned wraps properly
applied, full wrapped, and sleeve in No problems noted
olace
(v) Poured sockets secure and howing No problems noted
no separation
Some colter pins are beginning to rust. These
(vi) Shackles, bolts, pins, and cotter will not affect the structures condition, but
pinS secure and in good condition should be monitored and replaced in the future if
necessary.
3 Guy tensions Satisfactory, see attached charts
4 Record temperature, wind speed and direction 85F; sunny; calm
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 183 of 191
I. Concrete Foundations Conditions/Notes
1 Ground conditions No problems noted
a. Settlement. movement or earth cracks No problems noted
b. Erosion No problems noted
c. Site Condition (standing water, drainage, No problems noted
trees, etc.
2 Anchorage conditions No problems noted
a. Nuts and/or nut locking device (tightened) No problems noted
b. Grout condition No problems noted
c. Anchorages and/or anchor rod condition No problems noted
3 Concrete condrtion No problems noted
a. Cracking, spalling or splitting No problems noted
b. Chipped or broken concrete No problems noted
c. Honeycombing No problems noted
d. Low spots to collect moisture No problems noted
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 184 of 191
J. Guyed Mast Anchors Conditions/Notes
1 Settlement, movement or earth cracks No problems noted
2 Backfill heaped over concrete for water No problems noted
sheddino
3 Anchor rod condition for water shedding No problems noted
Corrosion control measures (galvanizing,
4 coating, concrete encasement, cathodic No problems noted
orotection svstems, etc.1 ..
j 5 Anchor heads clear of earth No problems noted
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 185 of 191
K. Tower Alignment Conditions/Notes
1 I Tower Verticality Satisfactory, see attached chart
2 I Tower Twist Satisfactory, see attached chart
3 I Guy Tensions Satisfactory. see attached chart
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 186 of 191
Naples, FL Verticality and Straightness
Verticalitv Straiahtness
Reference Deviation Deviation Resultant Allowable Resultant Allowable
Elevation along along Deviation Resultant Deviation Deviation
Axis (1) Axis (2) Deviation blw Elev. b/w Elev.
(ft.) (inches) (inches) (inches) (Inches) (inches) (inches)
400 0.02 -1.00 1.00 1200
0.33 0.60
380 0.01 -0.67 0.67 11.40
1.15 2.40
300 0.57 0.34 0.57 9.00
0.67 3.00
200 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00
0.33 1.80
140 -001 0.33 0.33 4.20
0.00 120
100 -0.01 0.33 I 0.33 3.00
0.33 3.00
0 000 0.00 0.00 0.00
. Denotes outside allowable range. otherwise satisfactory.
COMMENTS: from TIAlEIA-222-G
1. Section 13.3.3 recommends that the horizontal distance between the vertical centerlines
at any two elevations shall not exceed 0.25 percent of the vertical distance between the two
elevations.
Agenda Item No. 7 A
April 13, 2010
Page 187 of 191
Naples, FL Twist Measurements
Reference Twist with Allowable Twist Relative Twist Allowable Twist
Elevation respect to with respect to between reference between reference
10 ft. elev. 10 ft ele~ points points
Ift.l Ideorees) Idearees ..Ideorees) fdeareesJ
400 0.87 5.00
0.29 1.00
380 0.58 5.00
0.00 4.00
299 058 5.00
0.58 5.00
199 0.00 5.00 I
0.29 3.00
137 -0.29 5.00
0.00 2.00
99 -0.29 5.00
-0.29 5.00
0 0.00 I 0.00
I 0.00 0.00
* Denotes outside allowable range, otherwise satisfactory.
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
Page 188 of 191
Naples, FL Guy Tension Measurements
Guy To Guy Diam. Measured Recommended Tensions
Elevation Anchor and Type Tension Design I. T. (Allowable)
at 60 Deg. F at 60 Deg F
(ft) (in) (klos) (kiDS) (kiDS)
392 I A6 l"B.S. 12.83 12.20 9.76 I to 18.30
380 A5 1" B.S. 11.53 12.20 9.76 to 18.30
299 A4 1-3/8" B.S. 23.70 23.20 18.56 to 34.80
199 A3 1-3/8" B.S. 24.25 23.20 18.56 to 34.80
137 A2 1" BS 12.87 12.20 9.76 to 18.30
99 A1 1-1/8" B.S. 14.92 15.60 12.48 to 17.94
392 I B6 1" BS. 12.33 12.20 I 9.76 to 18.30
380 I B5 1" B.S. 13.08 I I 12.20 9.76 to 18.30
299 i B4 1-318" B.S. 22.49 I I 23.20 18.56 to 34.80
199 I B3 1-318" B.S. 24.95 IT 23.20 18.56 to 34.80
137 , B2 i 1" B.S 12.63 +: 12.20 9.76 to 18.30
99 B1 I 1-118" B.S. I 14.53 1560 12.48 to 17.94
392 I C6 .-----~-----T 12.20 9.76 I to 118.30
1" BL~L_J1Jl8
380 C5 I 1" B S. 11.38 I I 12.20 I--f&-i to 18.30
299 C4 1-3/8" B.S. 2190 I I 23.20 18.56 to 34.80
199 C3 1-318" B.S. 24.91 \ j 23.20 I 18.56 to 34.80
137 C2 1" B.S 12.18 12.20 9.76 to 18.30
99 C1 1-118" B.S. 16.51 15.60 12.48 to 17.94
. Denotes outside allowable range, otherwise satisfactory.
COMMENTS: from T1A/EIA-222-G
1. Section 7.6.1 recommends that initial tensions (LT.) in the guys, for design purposes, is normally
10% of the published breaking strength of the strand. with upper and lower limits of 15% and 8%,
respectively.
2. When using initial tension values greater than 15%. consideration should be given to the possible
effects of aolian vibration. Likewise, when uSing initial tension values less than 8%, consideration
should be given to the effects of galloping and slack-taut pounding.
3. Design guy initial tensions at 60'F are assumed to be 10% of the breaking strength of the steel cable
and applicable at the anchor.
4. 1 kip = 1000 Ibs.
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13, 2010
& K P A Page 18901191
COLEMA..~, YOVANOVICH OESTER,..
ATIORNEYS AT LAW
Kevin G. Coleman
Richard D. Y ovanovich
Edmond E. Koester
William M. Burke
Gregory L. Urbaneic
Matthew L. Grabinski
NORTIlERN TRUST BANK BUILDING
400 I Tamiami Trail North
Suite 300
Naples, FL 34103
239-435-3535
239-435-1218 Facsimile
Linda C. Brinkman
Craig D. Grider
Matthew M. Jackson
Alex R. Figares
Jeffrey J. Beihoff
Todd M. Rich
Writer's Email:
ryovanovich@eykJawflrm.eom
Of Counsel:
Kenneth R. Johnson
March 5,2010
Leo Ochs, Jr.
Deputy County Manager
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
RE: Re-consideration - CU-2008-AR-14085 Via email: leoochs@colliergov.net
Dear Mr. Ochs,
Our firm represents Renda Broadcasting Corporation. Renda Broadcasting Corporation is the
owner of the property and the communication tower which is the subject of Conditional Use
Petition CU-200B-AR-140B5. The conditional use petition sought approval to keep the older
tower on the property and not remove it as required by Resolution No. 93-219. The Board of
County Commissioners considered Petition CU-200B-AR-140B5 at its regular meeting on
February 23, 2010. The Petition was denied by the Board of County Commissioners.
Pursuant to Section 2-42(b) Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida, Renda
Broadcasting Corporation requests that the Board of County Commissioner reconsider Petition
CU-2008-AR-14085. One of the reasons the petition was denied was a concern by certain
Commissioners regarding the current safety of the older communication tower and concern
regarding future inspections of the two communication towers on the property should the
petition be approved. Renda Broadcasting Corporation did not know about the County required
inspections. In fact, it appears that none of the communication tower owners know of the
inspection requirement because none of the owners have provided the required inspection
reports. Although the reports were not furnished to the County, the towers have been inspected
in the past to assure they ar'e structurally sound. In addition, upon learning of the inspection
requirement, Renda Broadcasting Corporation immediately obtained an inspection for both
towers. The inspection reports confirmed that both towers are safe. Renda Broadcasting
Corporation will furnish all required inspection reports in the future.
Renda Broadcasting Corporation owns radio stations WGUF-FM and WSGL-FM. WGUF-FM
dedicates over 25 hours per week to Collier County issues. No other radio station that serves
this area provides this level of local programming. WGUF-FM regularly supports local charities
and local events. WGUF-FM interrupts its broadcasting to assist Collier County residents during
emergencies such as Hurricanes Charlie and Wilma.
March 4, 2010
2
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 190 of 191
Renda Broadcasting Corporation has been and will continue to remain a good corporate citizen.
The County can be assured that the required tower inspections will be made now that Renda
Broadcasting knows about the requirement.
Petition CU-2008-AR-14085 is a request to allow an existing tower to remain in place. The
County code encourages towers to be co-located or a site. Allowing the tower to remain is
consistent with the County code.
Renda Broadcasting Corporation acknowledges its past deficiencies with the tower. Renda
Broadcasting Corporation is attempting to cure those deficiencies through Petition CU-2008-AR-
14085.
Renda Broadcasting Corporation respectfully requests that the Commissioner adopt a motion to
reconsider Petition CU-2008-AR-14085 at its next available meeting.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
~0'~____
Richard D. Yovanovich
CC: Commissioner Fred Coyle, Chairman ,via e-mail
Commissioner Frank Halas, Vice Chairman, via e-mail
Commissioner Jim Coletta, via e-mail
Commissioner Donna Fiala, via e-mail
Commissioner Tom Henning, via e-mail
Jeffrey Klatzkow, County Attorney, via e-mail
Tony Renda, via e-mail
RDY/dis
;',1
Naples Dany News. SUnday,Marcb 28, 2010 . 25D
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION
NotiCe .'is hereby given that the Board of County Commj~ione",,'15 the..Bdatd .of
. Zoning Appeals, of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tue:si:fIY,' ~ril13,
~~ ~ne~e~. B3o:rfr~:;T~~i:~fir;t~~b::ti~~'~I~~~I.dl~~e ':~~n~o~W~ri~
9;OO~. Th.e1title of the proposed resol~on is as':fol.~~: . " ">, '~-?:,::-''', ;'~
A RESOLlrnON OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Of COLLIER couN'tv, FLORI.
, DA,PROVI.PlNG FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A'CONDmONAL USE TO .ALLOVII . .
. lWOCOMMUNICATlON TOWER5 WITHIN THE. ESTATES ZQNING DISTRICT PURSU-.::'
'ANT ;rOSEO'lOK 5.05:09 OF. THE COLLIER COUNTY'lAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
; FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION B, TOWNSHIP SO SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
;,:-TheBoard ~Ur c~~der Petiti'on: CU~2008-AR~14085; -Renda Broadcasting Corpora-
tion, represented by Richard- Yovanovlch, Esquire ofColemin,. Yovanovkh and
L Koester. P.A:~ requesting a. Conditional Use for a comrourlications tower afld the I
:'" ~n:~:tino~~tet~~~e~t~ ~~lft~e~~~~ theLa~~ta6e:v~r~ -z~~gc~:r~M
'~_.theapproximateIY'4.77-aa.e subject property is located at S860 g"ews Road, in,;Sec:-
tion 8, Township 50 South., Range 26 East. in Collier County, florida. ':-
NOTE: AII_ Persons wishing to speak on, any agenda item must register with,the
~d.:rua1~=r:~t:l~~i'~~~~~ta~t~~ o~~niii"~~ lit~ ~ye:o~c::r~
~~e~~ t~h:~~ir~~ =~k::::~~ fu~a~~~~ 6; :::~~Z:ti~~CO~;~~.all:!;~fo
minutes to speak on an item. ;>
Persons-wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the' Board agencta
=rh~~g~Ub~ita~jdc=t~~i~:n m~~~~~Z1~ ~in;n~d~p~r c~~s~:~V~
Board shall be submitted to the appropriate Coun,ty staff a minimum of seven days
prior to the public hearing. All material used in, presentations before the Board
will become a permanent part of th~ record.
Any person who decides to' appeal ill decision of the Board will ,need a record ofth'e
r:~~d~fg~h~e~~~~~i~~:r~tom~~~, t~h~~r~~c6id" i~~~~:~ t~,:u;:nta~n~ ~~:a:~r. ..
dence upon which the appeal is based.
:~.:, If you: are' a :p.ef5on with a disability who needs:any'ac<ommodationin brder"to p~r~
. tidpate:,inthis pr'!Ceeding,you are entitled, at ,nQ cost to you, 'to the provision Of
,~' '~:~"J;~~~-C:t'P~~~-=;~~! t~~a~o'M:~ '8~'iI%n~acWiesN::i::g~~~~~la11~
~.' (239)252-8380. Assisted listening devices for the hearing imp~ired are availabJe in
'~, the County Commissioners' Office.
. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
, BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
: COLLIER COUNTY, fLORIDA
,L FRED COYLE. CHAIRMAN
~'" DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
:_t By: Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk
: (5EAl)
,,*' March 28 '010
No184452Q
Agenda Item No. 7A
April 13. 2010
Page 191 of 191