Agenda 03/09/2010 Item #16C1
Agenda Item No. 16C1
March 9, 2010
Page 1 of 58
-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve a Fifth Amendment to the LandfIll Operating Agreement
between Collier County and Waste Management, Inc., of Florida, providing administrative
changes to clarify definitions that are consistent with Florida Administrative Code,
Chapter 62-701, Solid Waste Management Facilities; to align current business processes;
and, to restructure payment formulas due to the implementation of alternative daily cover
materials including Posi-Shell@, mulch, and other Florida Department of Environmental
Protection agency approved alternative cover materials to maintain odor control, landfill
airspace preservation, and to provide estimated annual operating cost savings of $266,141,
and estimated annual airspace savings valued at $736,285.
OBJECTIVE: Approval of a Fifth Amendment to the Landfill Operating Agreement (LOA)
providing administrative changes to clarify definitions that are consistent with Florida
Administrative Code, Chapter 62-701, Solid Waste Management Facilities; to align current
business processes; and to restructure payment formulas from three separate reimbursement
fonnulas to one, per-ton price inclusive of reimbursements for soil, airspace savings, and the use
ofPosi-Shell@ as an alternative daily cover material.
-
CONSIDERATIONS: The Solid Waste Management Department (SWMD) is responsible for
the management of the Collier County Landfill (Landfill) and continuously seeks solutions to
enhance best value, and regulatory compliant operations at the Landfill. Implementing the use of
altemative products as daily cover that controls odor in accordance with the zero off-site odor
policy, preserves valuable landfill airspace, and provides best value to the rate payers is one such
solution. The implementation of alternative daily cover is consistent with the Integrated Solid
Waste Management Strategy as the number one priority in conserving airspace and providing
best value management practice that increases the longevity of the landfill.
On September 12, 2006, Agenda item JOE, the Board gave direction to Waste Management, Inc.,
of Florida (WMIF), to perform a pilot test ofPosi-Shell@ as an alternative daily cover material to
reduce the consumption of six inchcs of soil as a daily cover. Posi-Shell@ is a Florida
Department of Environment Protection (FDEP) approved, spray-applied, cement-mortar coating
similar to stucco, and is both nonflammable and durable. On January 20, 2009, WMIF
presented to staff its airspace savings analysis utilizing Posi-Shell@ as an alternative daily cover.
WMIF estimated the use ofPosi-Shell@, soil, and mulch used for daily cover on an annual basis
in the approximate percentages of25 percent Posi-Shell(R), 45 percent soil, and 30 percent mulch.
,--.
Soil alone as a daily cover, which is the current practice, consumes approximately 48,110 cubic
yards of airspace per year. The reduction of soil usage increases the availability of valuable
airspace for continuous disposal. 1be net impact is an extension of the useful life of the Landfill
which will benefit future generations in Collier County. The use ofPosi-Shell@ will generate an
estimated savings in airspace valued at $22,000,000 over the next 30 years. Additionally,
through the use of soil, mulch, and Posi-Shell@, an estimated cost avoidance of up to $8,000,000
over the next 30 years in reduced odor control costs and operational reimbursement payments as
presented in Exhibit C, "Waste Management, Inc. of Florida Performance Measures". These
practices will not diminish the County's ability to effectively manage odors. The Perfonnance
1
-----~---~-"---"~-"._-~---_,~~ ,-.
- .,-.-_", '__"'-'W"",..,.-"._'"
.~,,-, - -,..
Agenda Item No. 16C1
March 9, 2010
Page 2 of 58
Measures built into the reimbursement pricing approaches from a maximum of28 percent of the
volume, in cubic yards for instances when soil only is utilized, to 21 percent of the volume, in
cubic yards, for the use of soil, mulch, and Posi-Shell@. In the event that WMIF uses more
material in any scenario than is listed on the Performance Measurcs, the County will be
responsible to only reimburse WMIF up to the performance measure thresholds. This is an
important and mutually ai,'feeable safeguard that provides an incentive to WMIF to maximize the
use of alternative daily cover materials.
The Fifth Amendment includes a change in the payment methodology from a per cubic yard
reimbursement basis to a per ton reimbursement basis. Based upon the negotiated Performance
Measures, WMIF invoicing is tied directly to waste buried and the application of cover materials.
The price for soil and Posi-Shell@ are pass-through charges. The County pays the actual cost of
these two materials; there are no escalations incorporated,
Staff has included the following attachments: Fifth Amendment to the LOA, Attachment A-I,
Summary of Base Tonnage Rates; Attachments A-2, A-2a through A-3, Escalation Methodology
for daily cover materials; Attachment A-4, Payment for Mulch Processing; Attachment B,
Monthly Odor Control Invoicing Process; Attachments B-1 through B-5, Sample Odor Control
Invoice; and Attachment C, Waste Management Inc. of Florida Performance Measures.
FISCAL IMPACT: The County will reduce its daily cover material cost by an estimated 35.16
percent by utilizing Posi-Shell@ as an alternative daily cover material. Based on current disposal
practices, the calculated savings include estimated savings in airspace of over $736,285 per year
over the next 30 years, and an estimated savings of up to $266,141 per year over the next 30
years in reduced soil payments and operational reimbursement payments to WMIF.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The use of alternative daily cover material is
consistent with the County's Growth Management Plan, specifically Solid Waste Sub-Element
Objective 2, Policies 2.2, 2.3, and 3.2, that state the County will utilize efficient methods for
environmentally sound disposal of solid waste in accordance with local, state and federal
regulations.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved by the County
Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient-JBW.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve and authorize the Chainnan to sign a Fifth Amendment to
the Landfill Operating Agreemcnt bctwecn Collier County and Waste Management, Inc., of
Florida, providing administrative changes to clarifY dctinitions that are consistent with Florida
Administrative Code, Chapter 62-701, Solid Waste Management Facilities; to align wrrent
business processes; and, restructuring payment formulas due to the implementation of
alternativc daily cover materials including Posi-Shell@, mulch, and other Florida Department of
Environmental Protection agency approved alternative cover materials to maintain odor control,
landfill airspace preservation, and to provide estimated annual operating cost savings of
$266,141, and estimated annual airspace savings valued at $736,285.
^- ,~.
PREPARED BY: Linda Jackson Best, M.B.A., Compliance Manager, Solid Waste Management
Department
~
~
~
Agenda Item No. 16C1
March 9, 2010
Page 3 of 58
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Item Number:
Item Summary:
16C1
Recommendation to approve a Fifth Amendment to the Landfill Operating Agreement
between Collier County and Waste Management, Inc., of Florida, providing administrative
changes to clarify definitions that are consistent with Florida Administrative Code, Chapter
62-701, Solid Waste Management Facilities; to align current business processes; and, to
restructure payment formulas due to the impiementation of aiternative daily cover materials
including Posi-Shell, mulch, and other Florida Department of Environmental Protection
agency approved alternative cover materials to maintain odor control, landfill airspace
preservation, and to provide estimated annual operating cost savings of $266,141, and
estimated annual airspace savings valued at $736,285.
Meeting Date:
3/9/20109:00:00 AM
Prepared By
Linda Best Compliance Manager Date
Public Utilities Division Solid Waste Management Department 3/2/20099:57:24 AM
Approved By
Linda Best Compliance Manager Date
Public Utilities Division Solid Waste Management Department 2/18/2010 11:28AM
--"
Approved By
Daniel R. Rodriguez Director. Solid Waste Date
Public UtilitIes Division Solid Waste 2/18/20101:25 PM
Approved By
Jennifer White Assistant County Attorney Date
County Attorney County Attorney 2/18/20103:01 PM
Approved By
Dianna Perryman Contracts Specialist Date
Administrative Services
Division Purchasing & General Services 2/18/20105:03 PM
Approved By
Kelsey Ward Manager - Contracts Administration Date
Administrative Services
Division Purchasing & General Services 2/19/20101:29 PM
Approved By
Thomas Wides Director - Operations Support - PUD Date
- Public Utilities Division Utilities Finance Operations 2/20/20101 :23 PM
Approved By
~1_. 11r<_1 " ____ .J_'T'__....\r>u__ __--<.1 1 ~('I ~,r ____1_ (\ "'('11 ('1\ 1" r"Alo.TC1-r1o.T'T' A r<r>lo.Tn A I 1 rr" nT TTllT Tr" TT'T'
""""''''('11('1
---.---.-....--.-,---.-.,...-
_.._--....."'----~...-
.-~-_...-.
-
Agenda Item No. 16C1
March 9, 2010
Page 4 of 58
Steve Carnell
Director ~ Purchasing/General Services
Date
Administrative Services
Division
Purchasing & General Services
2/22/20109:54 AM
Approved By
OMB Coordinator
Date
County Manager's Office
Office of Management & Budget
2/25/20109:03 AM
Approved By
James W. Delany
Date
County Attorney
County Attorney
2/25/2010 9:10AM
Approved By
Jeff Klatzkow
County Attorney
Date
2/26/2010 11 :07 AM
Approved By
Randy Greenwald
Office of Management &
Budget
Management/Budget Analyst
Date
Office of Management & Budget
2/26/201012:55 PM
Approved By
Mark Isackson
Management/Budget Analyst, Senior
Date
Office of Management &
Budget
Office of Management & Budget
2/27/20109:51 AM
.C".1 ~. 11""_1 A ___~ J_"T'_ _<-I 1'-.__ ~_..4-\ 1 CA "Yo .f __._1- ^ '"1(\1 AI 1 L r<r'.-....TDr"1l.T'T' A r<r.....T~ A \ 1 1:,..... Tn TraT Tr< T T'T'
,., ,..., '.....(\1 ^
>"-,
Fifth Amendment to the
"LANDFILL OPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN
COLLIER COUNTY AND WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. OF FLORIDA"
This amendment, dated to the referenced agreement shall be by and between the parties to the
original Agreement, Waste Management Inc. of Florida (to be refen'ed to as "Contractor") and Collier County,
Florida, (to be refetTed to as "Owner").
Statement of Understanding
RE: "LANDFILL OPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND WASTE
MANAGEMENT INC. OF FLORIDA"
In order to continue the services provided for in the original Contact document referenced above, the Contractor
agrees to amend the above refereuced Contract as follows:
To provide fol' Administrative changes to clarify Definitions to conform to Florida Administrative Code,
Chapter 62-701 Solid Waste Management Facilities, to align current business processes; and for the
restructuring of payment formulas due to the implementation of alternate daily cover materials inclnding
Posi,Shell@, and other Florida Department of Environmental Protection agency approved alternate daily
cover materials to maintain odor control, landfill airspace preservation and to provide annual operating
cost savings, as per Exhibit 5-A attached to this Amendment and incorporated herein by reference.
All other tenllS and conditions of the agreement shall remain in force.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the Connty have each, respectively, by an authorized person or
agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date(s) indicated below.
..
Accepted:
,2010
CONTRACTOR:
Waste Management Inc. of Florida
~
By:
-
OWNER:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Fre
. Coyle, Chai.rman
\J\pr) \\e~~ \
Witnessed:
,
. ~
/
/
/
Print Name and Title
/) /'" ,/
7<' .;.,.,..... ../
By: "",,") /./ /- 'r' /'"
, ./, , -- .. ,
.
-'" -.,' /
,,/ ./ '.,~.'
/."", /.
1..,......z>;{.-.-.::;:;;..l1
~ / .', /;
.- '. .J
1~3 t,' Jr /, (L; iJ-' {~'::.-~
, . , "
Print Name and Title .
6'f1t//~ ..iltlt I 'J ~
/
ATTEST:
.
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
CONT
"'~"
,
By: -~. C1_,/!. /,,-:<--
Dianna Penyman
/)FL---;L--t.-
.
_..._.._._~._.,
,-,~-,,--.---
._--'-'"-'_.~"
,.-,." ,~....,
.----.-.-, -
Exhibit 5-A
Fifth Amendment to the
"LANDFILL OPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN
COLLIER COUNTY AND WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. OF FLORIDA"
Note: Words stPueI<-through have been deleted, wOI'ds underlined have been added.
All references to the" " in the Landfill Operating Agreement and the First through the Fourth
Amendments are being replaced with the Collier County Landfill.
1.0 Definitions
"Airspace Reimbursement-Per Ton Rate" means the payment for airspace consumed in .the Collier County Landfill
as a result of implementing daily cover and alternative daily cover materials based upon the amount of tons of
solid waste buried in the Landfill".
"Alternative Daily Cover (ADC)" means material used as Initial Cover. other than e8lthen material placed on the
surface of the active face of a municipal solid waste landfill at the end of each operating day to satisfy the
@9uirements of Initial Cover. The term includes other material or thickness, agproved by the Department, that
minimizes disease vector breeding. animal attraetion,_and moisture infiltration. minimizes fire potential, prevents
blowing litter, controls odors. and improves landfill am>earance.
~losing" means tfle-.time at-wlHeh a Solid waste management-faeility ceases to acoept Soltd Wa3te, and inolll4es
those actions taken le-j;fepare ~or any necessal)' monitoring and maintenanoe after Closing
"Closing" means the time at which a solid waste management facility ceases to acceQt wastes, and includes those
actions taken by the owt,ler or operator of the facility to pJ:mJare the facility for any necessary monitoring and
maintenance after closing. Rnle 62-701.200 (17), FAC.
"Construction and Demolition Debris" means discarded materials generally considered to be not water soluble and
non-hazardous in nature. including but not limited to steel, glass, brick, egncrete, asphalt material. gipe, gypsum
wallboard, and lumber, from the construetion or destruetion of a strueture as part of a construetion or demolition
IDQjeet or from the renovation of a structure, including such dehris from construction of structures at a site remote
from the construction or demolition ~t site. The term includes rocks, soils. tree remains. trees, and other
vegetative matter that normally results from Ja)ld clearing or land development operations for a construction
IDQject; clean cardboard. llliPer. plastic. wood, and metal scraps from a constructionl2ffiiect; except as provided in
Section 403.707(9)0). F.S.. yard trash and unpainted. non-treated wood scraps from sources other than
construction or demolition_llli>jects. scrap from manufacturing facilities that is the type of matedal generally used
in constJuction p~ and that would meet the definition of construction and demolition debris if it were
generated as p8lt of a construction Ql' demolition p~.h including debris from the construction of manufactured
2
.-
homes and scrap shingles. wallboard. siding. concrete. and similar materials from industrial or commercial
facilities: and de minimis amounts of other non-hazardous wastes that are generated at construction or demolition
l1!Qjects. provided such amounts are consistent with best management practices of the constrnction and demolition
industries. Mixing of construction and demolition debris with other types of solid waste will cause it to be
classified as other than construction and demolition debris. Rule 62-701.200 (24). F.A.C.
"Facility" or Facilities" means the the Colliel' County Landfill. and the Immokalee Landfill to be
operated pursuant to this Agreement and, upon Closure of the Immokalee Landfill, the Transfer station te--be
construoted- that has been constructed and will be operated by the Contractor at the lmmokalee Landfill
!!Hazardous waste" meaRS a Solid waste il1(leflfiHee~meRt as a hazardous wante in ~2 73g
F.A.C., tfle-Resouroe and Conscrvation Act,-42.--U.S.C. 69lH, et seq., as amende4 and-the Comprehensive
Em'ironmellta-!--Response, Compcnsation and-f,ia&ffity Aot;-42. D.S.C. 96lH, et.seq., as amended, or otheF
. .
.
"Hazardous Waste" means a solid waste regulated by the Del1artment as a hazardous waste pursuant to Chapter 62-
730. F.A.C.
!!ffiffial cover" has the menning given it in Rale 62 7~F.A.C.
"Initial Cover" means a 6-inch layer of compacted eal1h, used to cover an area of solid waste before placement of
additional waste. intermediate cover. or final cover. The term also includes other material or thickness. al1Proved
by the Department. that minimizes vector breeding. animal attraction. and fire potential. prevents blowing litter.
controls odors. and improves landfill al1Pearance. Rule 62-701.200 Cill. F.A.C. Refer to the definition for
Alterpative Daily Cover (ADC).
"Intonnediate cover" has the meaning given it in Rale 62 7().h;!OO ( 611-F. A. C.
"Intel1nediate Cover" means a layer of compacted earth at least one foot in depth al1Plied to a solid waste disposal
unit. The tenn also includes other material or thickness. approved by the Department that minimizes disease
vectors. odors. and fire. and is consistent with the leachate control design of the landfill. Rule 62-701.200 (55).
F.A.C.
. ..
"Landfill" means a solid waste disposal facility. which is an area of land or an excavation where wastes are or have
been placed for disposal. for which a permit. other than a general pennit, is required by Section 403.707. F.S. This
term shall not include:
(a) A land spreading site;
(b) A surface iml1oundment;
.
(c) An injection well defined under and subiect to the provisions of Chapter 62-528. F.A.C.; or
U!) A construction and demolition debris disposal site regulated by Rule 62-701.730. F.A.C.
Rule 62-701.200 (57). F.A.C.
"On site" means on the same or geographically contiguous j>ffipCfl)', w!Heh may l7e-iIivided-by a f*lbIio or pri\<at<l
~
"On-Site" means on the same or geo~aphica]]y contiguous Illi1perty. which may be divided by a public or private
right-of-way. It does not include two or more parcels of land more than a mile apal1 that are connected only by a
public or private right,of-way. Rule 62.701.200 (80). F.A.C.
--.-,
"Operating Day" means any calendar day during which the Landfill is operating and is open for receipt of waste
from County and contract haulers, private commercial haulers and /01' the public. NOlmal operating days shall be
3
--"".'.._~._~_..._'.._--_.-
six days per week, Sundays excluded, The FOUl1h of July, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day
Pay shall not be operating days. [fFourth of July or Christmas Dayor~ falls on a Sunday, the following
Monday shall not be an operating day.
~Proeessing" "'e!llls any teehaique designed-to change the physical, ohemical or bielogioaI-ellaraotef or
oomposition of any Soli<! waste so as to render i!-safe..fef-lraIlSpeFI; amendable-to reOO'lel)', storage Of Recyoling;
safe-for disposal; or reduced in vollllfle or coneentfatioll.
"Processing" means any technique designed to change the physical, chemical, or biological character or
composition of any solid waste so as to render it safe for transport. amenable to recovety, storage or recycling; safe
for disposal: or reduced in volume or concentration. Rule 62-701.200 (88). FAC,
~Reeovered matcria\t;!!-llas the l!'leaning given t&it in Rule 62 70~.A,C.
"Recovered Materials" means metal. lllWer. glass, plastic, textile, or rubber materials that have known recycling
potential, can be feasibly recycled. and have been diverted and source se~rated or have been removed from the
solid waste stream for sale. use, or reuse as raw materials, whether or not the materials require subseqllent
processing or separation from each other, but does not include materials destined fQr any use that constitutes
.cfuposal. Recovered materials as described above are not solid waste. Rule 62-701.200 (95), FAC.
~Recyeling" has the meaning given te-it in Rale 62 7Q..l.200-(67) F,i\.C.
"Recycling" means any process by which solid waste, or materials which would otherwise become solid waste, are
collected, separated, or processed and reused or returned to use in the form of raw materialS or products. Rule 62-
701.200 (99). FAC.
"Solid vlasl?has the meaning given t&it in Rule 62 70~73) FAC.
"Solid Waste" means: sludge that is not regulated under the federal Clean Water Act or Clean Air Act. as well as
sludge from a waste treatment works, water sup-ply treatment plant. or air pollution control facility; 01' garbage.
mbbish, refuse. special waste, or other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semi-solid. or contained gaseous
material resulting from domestic, industrial. commercial. mining, agricultural. or governmental operations.
Materials not regulated as solid waste pursuant to this chapter are: recovered materials: nuclear source or
byproduct materials regulated under Cha~r 404, F.S., or under the Federal Atomic Energy Act of 1954 as
amended; suspended or dissolved materialsjn domestic sewage effluent or lITigation retum flows. or other
regulated point source discharges: regulated air emissions; and fluids or wastes associated with natural gas or crude
oil exploration or production. Rule 62-701.200 (107LF,A.C.
"Soil" means fragmental material com~e!tof ealill. sand and rock. It also includes ash. mineral particles. other
non-odorous ea11h-like materials or combinations Jhereof, suitably graded crushed concrete. Posi-Shell and such
other material as Illay be agreed by the County and Contractor to be eq~ivalent or better than soil for the pJJ.!Jloses
for which the material will be used. A material meeting the definition of soil herein is soil for mrrPoses of this
Agreement including, but not limited to. reimbursement pursuant to Section 2.26; provided, however, that where
Section 2.26 calls for reimbursement of that specific material. for example. as Posi-Shell or mulch, sllch specific
&quirements shall prevail.
~pecial wastes" has the meaning given te-it in Rule 62 70-h200(7&),P.A.C. and inclooes uny waste dcscriee&ffi
~ "C" attaehed-hereto and incoJ']Jorate4-by referenoe.
:'SpeCial Wastes" means solid wastes that can ~re s~dling and management. including but not
limited to, whIte goods, waste tires, used oil. lead-acid batteries, constructiol) and demolition debris, ash
residue, yaa!..1l:aID, biological wastes, and mercury-containing devices all.!Llillnps, Rule 62-701.200 (1131
F .A.c.
4
,
--
"Ton" means a short ton, 2000 pounds (0.9078 metric ton~). Rule 62-701.200 (119), F.A.C.
"Waste-tire" has the meaning given it ill GRapter 62 7l-!-,f.A.C.
"Waste Tire" means a tire that has bee!) removed from a motor vehicle and has not been retreaded or re-grooved.
The tenn includes used tires and Ql'ocessed tires. but does not include solid lUbber tires and tires that are
inseparable from the rim. Rule 62-701.200 (126). F .A.C.
"White goods" means inoperative refrigerators, ranges, washers, Walfleaters, freezers and-ether similar domestie
ami eommercial.iances.
"White Goods" means inoperative and discarded refrigerators, ranges, washers, water heaters, freezers, and other
similar domestic and commercial large ap,pliances. Rule 62-701.200 (133), F.A.C.
"Working face" means t~ion of.a-LandHlI...whero waste is dtseharged,spread and oomp00te4-prior fa
.
"Working Face" means that portion of a solid waste disposal unit where waste is deposited, spread. and compacted
before j;!lacement of initial cover. Rule 62-701.200 (134). F.A.C.
"Yard Trash" means vegetative matter resulting from landscaping maintenance or land clearing operations and
includes materials such as tree and shrub trimmings, grass clippings, palm fronts, trees and tree stumps, and
associated rocks and soils. Rule 62-701.200 (135), FAC.
. "...
Section 2.14 Cover Material
Any use of tarpaulins in lieu of Initial cover material shall be for the working face only and shall require
the prior written approval of the County Manager. In no event shall the Landfill working face exceed a
fifty (50) foot by one hundred (100) foot area when daily work ceases on the working face.
Subject to the provisions of this paragraph and the requirements and procedures set forth in Section 2.26(5) and
2.26(6), the Contractor shall be allowed to use ADC if the use of such material is requested in writing by the
County, accepted by the Contractor and aj;1proved by the Department. For the Q!!!:Poses of this paragraph only, the
alternate initial cover material shall consist of: biomass (e.g" mulch); construction and demolition debris (not
including gypsum wallboard); a combination of biomass and construction and demolition debris; el' a combination
of biomass, construction and demolition debris, and soiLa combination of Posi-Shell, soil and biomass; or a
combination of Posi-Shell and soil. If the ADC is used in conjunction with initial cover material containing soil,
the Contractor shall be reimbursed for the soil and ADC j;!Ul'suant to the provisions of Subsection 2.26(5) of this
Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the County has requested, the Contractor has accepted and the
lliPaltment has ap,proved the use of a combination of Posi-Shell and soil and a combination of Posi-Shell. soil and
biomass for ADC.
2.26 Additional Odor Control Measures:
2.26 (1)( c ): The Contractor shall construct horizontal gas collection trenches and other necessalY illPing -!lHEl::shaIl
install eolleGtio!l headers an~hor necessary piping ,...*4ho ","orking face as i*lfHlf4he Conlft!etor's normal
epeFating procedure, unless the Contractor rece;"es prior written authorization from the County-Manager te
lelminate-this prooedure as necessary to comply with permit and regulatOlY requirements. The Contractor shall
install these horizontal collectors tr<lnOfles within the first forty (40) vertical feet of waste placement and will be
5
used until such time there is sufficient depth that vertical wells can be effectively installed as palt of notnlal
Qperations.
Section 2.26 (I) (g) The Contractor shall promptly install an upgraded blower and flare system with a lBiBiJRum
manufacturer's rated flow capacity of at least 3,000 standard cubic feet per minute. This system shall be designed,
maintailled, ancklper<lle&-to ensure t~ower and-flare are operate4 oontinuously and rest;wt automatieally, if
necessary with an automatic restmt feature and manually activated redundant blower unit. The system shall be
maintained to minimize downtime and operated continuously to the extent practical. The County shall be notified
of any downtime within one hour or scheduled maintenance with at least one week of advance notice. The
Contractor shall maintain an inventory of critical parts in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations
and specifications and utilize best management practices to ensure prompt and efficient retutn to operations in the
event of an outa@,
2.26 E4fr-+he Contractor SRall e reimbursed-$G.36 for eaeh-toR of.oolHl wast&-tllat is disposecklf in a lined
" . .
.
2.26(4) Reserved
2.26 (5): Su~imitations eontained in this Agreement,-the County-sha-llreimburse the Contractef
.. al-eff.site soil-tRat was purchased and used as a resuk-ef imi'Hementing the
fefjuirements of Sllbsections 2.2681 .
on the Contractor's invoices for soil-purohases. However, te-4elRonsffilte eomplianoe with Subseetion
2.26(7};-eelow, the amount-ef.the reimbursement-also shall-be evalll&le4-by <Ising lhe-fe!lowing fornmla+
SF.- Q x C
~
,
SF. - the soil roimb<lrsomenl-te-the ContraotBF,
.
month; and
C- the oosf-per cubie yard-ef soil,based on the average cost-daring the-preoeding month,
+he Contractor shall Ro<-be reimbursed undeHhis Subsection 2.26(5) or Subsection 2.26(~low, unless
the Contraotor uses soil as initial covel' at-lhe-Nttj;les LandAA.--Exocpt as enpressly-provided in tlH5
Agreemeut, Contractor sltall nOf.-be reimbursed or reoeive any other paymout-for the cost-ef-proouring,
J3fejlaring, handling 01' placing initial covel' at !lle-Faoilities.
2.26 (5) Sub~to the limitations and procedures contained in this agreement, the Couuty shall pay the contractor
!!"per ton base rate for each ton of solid waste that is disposed of in a lined cell at the Collier County Landfill, This
payment is compensation for the use of soil, mulch and Posi-Shell, or a combination thereof as mmroved by the
,Qwaltment. The base rates to be utilized for each component are set forth in Attachments A-I, A-2, A-3 and A-4
attached hereto and made a patt hereof. The base rates are established pursuant to the methodology set forth in
Attaohment A-2. Attachment A-I contains base rates for compensation for (i) daily cover material/odor control
(shown as Material Reimbursement) and CU1J!iwace reimbursement. The Airspace Reimbursement-Per Ton Rate
payment is for airsp1!-'>_ consumed in the Collier County Landfill as a result of implementing the requirements of
Subsection 2.26 (l)(a) and (b), above. As referenced in Attachment A-I. Note 2, the $0.36 per ton of solid waste
reimbursement will cease when the Collier County Landfill has received or will receive 9.3 million tons of solid
~vaste for disposal in the lined cells after May I, 2001 and the time ofthe Landfill's final closure.
Attaclmlent A-I sets fmih base rates in four scenarios: la) use of soil only; (b) use of soil and Posi-shell; (c) use of
soil, Posi,Shell and mulch; and Id) use of soil and mulch only. T~pB1ties have established multiple base rates to
6
-
address the four scenarios in which one or more of the material components for daily cover and odor control
measures are unavailable due to failure of supJlly, regulatol)' restrictions. County directive as allowed in this
Agreement or similar reasons. It is expected that soil, mulch and Posi-Shell will be available so that such materials
may be used on an annual basis in alll1roximl!tely the following,.percentages for daily cover: 25% Posi-Shell, 30%
mulch and 45% soil. However, should one or more become unavailable, for the time of such unavailability. the
~riate base rate in AttachmentsA-2a and A-3 (as subsequently modified as provided in this Agreement) shall
be used to calculate the payment to be made by the County to the Contractor. In this regard, tile County. at no
charge. will cause to provide vegetative yard waste to Contractor for processing into mulch. The rates regarding
processing vegetative yard waste into mulch are included in Attachment A-4.
Contractor shall m:ware a monthly invoice for initial cover, ADC, odor control and ait'sRace reimbursement and
Qrovide same to the County. The methodology for producing the invoice with corroborating documents pursuant to
this Section 2.26(5) is set forth in the attachment entitled "Instructions" attached hereto as Attachment B.
.
.
~
.
, .
.
~
,
AA=-the airspace reimbursemenHEHhe COlltraelef;-
Q - ~uantity of soil-purchased and used as initffil cover at-tfle..Naj>
. .
.-
received or will receive 9/3 IRillion tons of solid .,.lBs!e-for disposal in lined-eells-between May ~ and-the
.
.
2.26 (6) The base rates for soil and Posi,Shell shall be adiusted monthly based on the indexes provided in
Attachments A-2 and A3. These Attachments reflect the average monthly cost per cubic yard for purchasing soil,
the mixture of soil and Posi.Shell and the mixture of soil and mulch used for daily cover materials. The base rate
per ton is adjusted upwards or downwards to reflect the average cost of soil purchased during that month. For
example. if the average cost of soil for the month is $1335. the base rate is $3.18 ReI' buried ton in the Collier
County Landfill. Attachment A,3 relates to the average monthly cQR.per load of Posi-Shell. The cost for Posi-
Shell will be updated each time new material is purchased for the use of Posi-Shell. The updated cost will include
components as listed on Posi-Shell Cost Worksheet. Based on the costper load. the QIT.ton base rate is adjusted
!!jJwards or downwards based on the updated cost per load of Posi-Shell. Attachment A-2b is an index that reflects
the base rate for soil.ivhen only soil and Posi-Shell are available. Attachment A-2c reflects the base rate for soil
when only sdil and mulch are available. Attachment A-2d is an index that reflects the ba~e rate for soil when soil.
Posi-Shell and..1llulch are available for use. Contractor agrees to utilize best_value procurement practice in
obtaining soil from offsite sources. In doing so. Contractor may consider the following factors in selecting vendors
and making purchases: quality and quantity of soil; geographic location; transportation costs; vendor history and
reliability; price; payment terms; rebates and discounts.
t1) When cule>tlatillg the Amolmt-ef-the Contmcte..'s reimbursemenIs-pUl'suullt-to Subsectioas 2.26~) uad~
maximum allowa9Ie value for "Q" (the qUAntity of-purchased soil in c"hie yards1-ffiall-be 28% of-the volume, in
. . ... ..
,
7
-..,--,---,-_..
--_..~- ..>"
. _.,,-~ ,
\Vasto volume placed in oubic yards - Waste-placed in tons diviGee-lly-Q.65.
=File resijlts of -this caloolation shall---be re\.iewed annually and-the reimbursement&-te-the Contractor sl~
Landfill, as determined-bj' aerial-jffietogrammetry or other me~lli"al<!fll aoouracy
(7) When calculating the amount of the Contractor's reimbursements pursuant to Subsections 2.26(5) and (Q), the
performance standards (Attachment C) ,that were built into the reimbursement pricing based upon cubic yards
~posed. range from a maximum of 28% of the volume, in cubic yards, for when soil only was utilized to 21 % of
the volume, in cubic yards, when soil. mulch and Posi-Shell are used. If WMIF uses more material in any scenario
than listed on the reimbursement pricing range schedule, the County will only be reimbursing to these thresholds.
. .
,
'" ,
control meaSllres required-by Section 2.26 oJ:.this Agreement-sflal.l not exoeed-$3.86 per ton of-oolid waste-ffisposed
. . . . . . .
basis. On June I~02 and-et-least oncc each ycar thereafter, tile Contractor shall-mtbmit a written repeff-te-!he
Coullty--Manager demonstFflting coml'liance wit.fl.--the requiremelltG of --this paragraph. At a minimum, tfie
.'
b ltlH>f-the reimbtlrsements-tilat-!he Contractor received
during tl1€--preceding 23 menlfis-pursuanHo Section 2c-26-Bf-4' '" ; .'
reimbursements were greater4han $3.86 per ton. If.the reimbursemonts e"ceedOO $3.86 per ton, the Couniy-sllall
. .
.
Agreement-;.
+he maximllln reimbursement--ef.-$3.86 per tOil shfrl.l..-be adj$!ed anllual.Jy in accordance wi~rocedures
desorieea in Section 5.2 of -this Agreement.--Howcvcr, any C~ment~based on the changes in tfie
GFl-tflat ocour after-the elfeetive date of-the Second Amelldmenl-te-tllis Agreement.
I
8
.
---
Exhibit 5-A
Attachment A-I
Collier County Landfill
Summary of Base Tonnage Rates fOI' Odor Control Reimbursement
Per Ton Rates
Per Ton Rate
Per Ton Rate Soil, Mulch Pe,' Ton Rate
Per Ton Rate Soil & Posi- and Posi-Shell Soil & Mnlch
SoilOnlv Shell Usa e Usa e Only
Material Reimbnrsement Amonnt
Total Soil Reimbursement $ 3.13 $ 2.34 $ 1.40 $ 1.88
Total Mulch Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Posi-Shell Reimbursement $ - $ 0.72 $ 0.72 $ -
ITotal Material Reimbursement (Note 1) I s 3.131 $ 3.061 $ ).121 $ 1.881
I Airspace Reimbursement- Per Ton Rate (Note~) 1351 1.141 1.141 1.351
-- ITotal Reimbursement (per Ton) 1$ 4.481$ 4.20 I $ 3.261 $ 3.231
Note I: Material reimbursemeut per ton rates are adjusted based on the cost of soil (Per Cubic Yard) and Posi-Shell
(Per Load)_ These rates are indexed based on the applicable exhibit
Note 2: Inclnded in the Airspace Reimbursement- Per Ton Rate is the $0.36 per ton of solid waste rate
established in the Second Amendment, Section 2.26(4). The $0.36 per ton of solid waste reimbursement
will cease when the Collier County Landfill has received or will receive 9.3 million tons of solid waste for
disposal in lined cells between May t, 2001 and the time orthe Landfill's final closure,
-~"-.."
9
'-.---.-- -~
..-.,....-".-" ~,.~._._,
Exhibit S-A
Attachment A-2
Collier County Landfill
Odor Control Process
Escalation Methodology
Soil Cost Escalation
On all of the soil escalation worksheets, there are assumptions indicating the following:
o Base soil price per cubic yard -In all cases this is $7.22/cu yd.
o Annual assumed tons -In all cases this is 219,100 tons of solid waste, equivalent to 700 tons per
day.
o Base rate for soil reimbursement is predicated on the escalation scenario. The rate reflects the
base rate cost per ton at the annual usage assumed, and base soil prices per cubic yard. The
base rate is predicated on the amount of soil used in each scenario, see below:
.~ .
Scenario Annual Cubic Yards of Annual Soil Cost Base Rate Per Ton
Soil --
-----.._-_._~
Soil Only 94,860 $684,889 $3.13
~
Soil & Posi~Shell Only 70,974 $512,432 $2.34
Soil & Mulch Only 56,916 $410,934 $1.88
.-.---
Soil, Mulch & Posi-Shell 42,584 $307,456 $1.40
Since the base rates are reflected on a per ton basis, the adjustment is predicated on the change in cost
of soil at a rate of $0.01 increment or taking the 219,100 assumed tons and dividing by 100 or
increments of $2,191. Each change in cost either up or down by $2,191 changes the per ton rate by
$0.01. Each of the escalation worksheets has the same methodology.
Posl-Shell Cost Escalation
On the Posi-Shell Cost escalation worksheet the assumptions utilized are as follows:
o Base Posi-Shell cost per load is $974.00
o Annual assumed tons are 219,100, equivalent to 700 tons per day.
o Base rate for Posi~Shell reimbursement is predicated on the use of 161 loads of Posi-Shell per
year at a total annual cost of $156,814.
o Base Rate per Ton is $0.72
Since the base rate is reflected on a per ton basis, the adjustment is predicated on the change in the cost
of Posi~Shell at a rate of $0.01 increment or taking the 219,100 assumed tons and dividing by 100 or
increments of $2,191. Each change in cost either up or down by $2,191 changes the per ton rate by
$0.01.
-
Naples Landfill
Soli Pricing Escalation Methodology
Exhibit S-A
Attachment A-2a
Sase Soil Price Per Cubic Yardl $
Annual Assumed Tons:
Sase Rate for Soil Reimbursement: I $
7.221
219,100
3.131
-,
Per Ion Indexed rates when Soil ani is
So 'f Base Ratel
.
, Rate Cumulative
. ,
,
..
. .
. ,...,
~,,-;\., , .. . Increase Rate
~~' ~
.
r:"tff!i: . $ (0.01) $ 2.62
. .
, $ (0.01 $ 2.63
6tliil:f .' . .'
" n $ (0.01 $ 2.64
t~j{H
'.~..'" . ~I$ lO.Ol $ 2.65
'''~, ~.c/~.-
"""'~"6.1 $ (0.01 $ 2.66
,.-."."...'\.".... .-
^_~.0'.,,__",_3l .- .
'."""mI5B $ (0.01) $ 2.67
._.'.";'-'."""",,.~ . .-
"";:'6?181 $ (0.01 $ 2.68
, . ..... .....~.t.'" ..,,__"
. . .'S !iii.' $ (0.01 $ 2.69
'... .':."."'.,1
'If!! 7 $ (0.01 $ 2.70
....L.Z.
"6:250 $ (0.01) $ 2.71
, 'E!.m $ (0.01) $ 2.72
S.2a6 $ (0.01 $ 2.73
6:319 $ (0.01) $ 2.74
6:342 $ (001) $ 2.75
6.365 $ (0.01) $ 2.76
6389 $ (0.01) $ 2.77
L_____
.. ....IM12. $ (0.01) $ 2.78
. ..6;4.3.5 $ (0.01) $ 2.79
'S![58 $ (0.01) $ 2.80
..."" '.
......6:~.Bl $ (0.01 $ 2.81
.,.6:60;4 $ (0.01 $ 2.82
.S:527 $ (0.01 $ 2.83
'..8:550 $ (0.01) $ 2.84
"..-..--.--...-..
".S:5n $ (0.01 $ 2.85
..Er598 $ (0.01 $ 2.86
, ...,...-....
6..619 $ (0.01) $ 2.87
'..M!3 $ (0.01) $ 2.88
M:SB $ (0.01) $ 2.89
6'889 $ (0.01 $ 2.90
".,.-..-'
11.712 $ (0.01) $ 2.91
6.735 $ (0.01) $ 2.92
. 6;75J $ (0.01) $ 2.93
"S'l $ (001) $ 2.94
. r:1!1
"" ".,~..,. -,- "'~
. "(l;!l:QJl. $ (0.01 $ 2.95
'm;
:"8;8 . $ (0.01 $ 2.96
.. :'S65!! $ lO.o1 $ 2.97
.,.,.,'......,.......-.,
'6'!l1:4 $ (0.01) $ 2.98
-.."..,,-..-:.., ..,,:-
Ji:\l9'7; $ (0.01) $ 2.99
.....Il. g $ (0.01) $ 3.00
-,...... '
."",......,;
/'?,'!tll.liJ $ (0.01) $ 3.01
;"..',''i,~~;$'' .1. .~
if7':Q"!i- , $ ro.Ol) $ 3.02
,~;._",).;..~.~. ,.
. ,IUl $ (0.01) $ 3.03
'.":"''''''.'1;.'' , $ 0.01 $ 3.04
,'.,,'-,.' ~
,.;",",tl~~ Oll .
. . .....m: ~ '. $ 0.01) $ 3.05
.<"....,':~
:_".,."",.;,:)o..~lJ ._ ,
.'.""."'Y'-!.'- . " $ 0.01) $ 3.06
.'.."';;:;'<1(, .
:\"y~,~;,; , . $ 0.01 $ 3.07
-,.","A",)oo/i; "
.'.' ,,, . $ 0.01 $ 3.08
,'" ".-
"n..".",_., . ,
... . . ~'121l 0.01) $
,;.',:}:;;;L .fft-'"i $ 3.09
-':'i)''1'.",t'A 511 $ (0.01 $ 3.10
....,.. .
~",".'''''';':" ' . ..-. .
.,. 1;17il $ (0.01) $ 3.11
7:191 $ 10.01) $ 3.12
..~.
...., ....2.ft. .
_,;:<..J:~
wr ft, $
..!..k<,,:;.r ~.
._e".. ~ ".: $
"::-._;'-'."'~
:i.....H. t
::..JT $
''''7i.~1n
"i~~
'M1i.9. $
1.a62 $
1"'" '
..~~5 $
. 7:428 $
7Ali.l $
7.47.4 $
7.497 $
7,520 $
7.543 $
7.568 $
7.5g0 $
1:Sj3' $
rll.~6 $
7.659 $
7,~ $
7.705 $
. 7.728 $
7.751. $
7.774 $
7;797 $
7,621 $
r:a~ $
7.8S7 $
1.890 $
7.9J3 $
7.936 $
I,9ll9 $
. 7.982 $
a:Q,O.s. $
. S;C!28 $
8:Q~f $
. 8,07.5 $
. J!:lt9a: $
'.LS;l~j: $
j;;.8ffB: $
""""~7' $
, ;:,;;.:alj.Y')~
:i'..'.\I..tlIQ: $
,.'6\\"713" $
".,,-.~ ,_~:B, ...~:
",'.'2 $
M'.'...___. ...'-'
"':S' '" $
".-..,.,..... p;
'8: alf $
. '306 $
..8. .
. . 8:.329 $
8.352 $
Cumulative
Rate
6ase Ratel
Rate Cumulalive
Increase Rate
01 $' 3.13
0.01 $ 3.14
0.01 $ 3.15
0.01 $ 3.16
0.01 $ 3.17
0.01 $ 3.18
0.01 $ 3.19
0.01 $ 3.20
0.01 $ 3.21
001 $ 3.22
0.01 $ 3.23
0.01 $ 3.24
0.01 $ 3.25
0.01 $ 3.26
0.01 $ 3.27
0.01 $ 3.28
0.01 $ 3.29
0.01 $ 3.30
0.01 $ 3.31
0.01 $ 3.32
0.01 $ 3.33
0.01 $ 3.34
0.01 $ 3.35
0.01 $ 3.36
0.01 $ 3.37
0.01 $ 3.38
0.01 $ 3.39
0.01 $ 3.40
0.01 $ 3.41
om $ 3.42
0.01 $ 3.43
0.01 $ 3.44
0.01 $ 3.45
0.01 $ 3.46
0.01 $ 3.47
0.01 $ 3.48
0.01 $ 3.49
0.01 $ 3.50
0.01 $ 3.51
0.01 $ 3.52
0.01 $ 3.53
0.01 $ 3.54
om $ 3.55
0.01 $ 3.56
0.01 $ 3.57
0.01 $ 3.58
0.01 $ 3.59
0.01 $ 3.60
0.01 $ 3.61
0.01 $ 3.62
,:,""~' .. . $ 0.01 $ 3.63
.
,:#;;Jj",
'.."rn!'1Jl . $ 0.01 $ 3.64
'I\&~Q. ,
'0"""" i $ 0.01 $ 3.65
"..'.<
'.;,.,'ii'IJ,-' ,
-'l";i:~:- ., $ 0.01 $ 3.66
.
'.',,;;;',;i. .
"Fi- lIt $ 0.01 $ 3.67
,..'-'
..""'-.-
:.",;;~, 9Q $ 0.01 $ 3.68
'hi,-.', . "'81 13 $ 0.01 $ 3.69
,.,'.:",L.3.,_".,....'
.....S.53 $ 0.01 $ 3.70
,..... '- -;"~-
""s' .1\Q $ 0.01 $ 3.71
.,..,.......! . "8lS83' $ om $ 3.72
---~,. _..,
's'SIllI $ 0.01 $ 3.73
j...., ~....,_."
lJ:S2a $ 0.01 $ 3.74
..MS2 $ 0.01 $ 3.75
8:f'l75 $ 0.01 $ 3.76
M98 $ 0.01 $ 3.77
8.721 $ 0.01 $ 3.78
.B:W $ 0.01 $ 3.79
....s:7,s6 $ 0.01 $ 3.80
;6:Ial $ 0.01 $ 3.81
8.814 $ 0.01 $ 3.82
,..-....-
0':6:637 $ 0.01 $ 3.83
. '..6:6,SO $ 0.01 $ 3.84
"M83 $ 0.01 $ 3.85
. 8.906 $ 0.01 $ 3.86
,!I;92a $ 0.01 $ 3.87
.6.SS2 $ 0.01 $ 3.88
8:915 $ 0.01 $ 3.89
_,r.I.......
"a.996 $ om $ 3.90
9022 $ 0.01 $ 3.91
9.0. 5 $ 0.01 $ 3.92
9.006 $ 0.01 $ 3.93
.l!:O.al $ 0.01 $ 3.94
..~;t14 $ 0.01 $ 3.95
'11137 $ 0.01 $ 3.96
..I....
9116.0 $ 0.01 $ 3.97
.91163, $ 0.01 $ 3.98
906 $ 0.01 $ 3.99
.J!..
'je129 $ 0.01 $ 4.00
c....." ~
,;,GJJJ ~a $ 0.01 $ 4.01
"'''lif' " $ 0.01 $ 4.02
'.'.". "
""M., .'
,.:, .~ $ 0.01 $ 4.03
'.',,",' $ 0.01 $ 4.04
...,,:,4.',' .-
..,,,~ $ 0.01 $ 4.05
.. -' ' '
. ..-.'~. <
. '''Dl6'&:: $ 0.01 $ 4.06
".. .
,,,",,>. ~",... i-
'''''IIJ l" $ 0.01 $ 4.07
' ,..,
_ ~,1'""."... ,
.." ,..'"' $ 0.01 $ 4.08
..~;;,;> 1
-,.,,!~i' II $ 0.01 $ 4.09
-."-",,,.. . "
"""!I:i 11.. $ 0.01 $ 4.10
".",.ii..'
!l' 8J. $ 0.01 $ 4.11
.,. ,
,.,C-,,",, .."" "';9'6'01 $ 0.01 $ 4.12
'9.~30 $ 0.01 $ 4.13
Naples LF _Escalation Rales.Revl0-09 (2).xls., Soli Pricing - Soil Only
"---._".
- -,_.".._.,~.......,..-. -~."
"-.,,"-
Naples Landfill
Soli Pricing Escalation Methodology
, g.~~~ $ 0.01 $ 4.14
, ~,!!lQ $ 0.01 $ 4.15
. 'g;!!.!l9 $ 0.01 $ 4.16
:--, Z $ 0.01 $ 4.17
r."'..-,',.,
'Q)] 11 $ 0.01 $ 4.18
-,.,.-.-.,...-..
;,:"1L. ,![ $ 0.01 $ 4.19
. " $ 0.01 $ 4.20
-,_,J" ..
'lfi~A: $ 0.01 $ 4.21
, -.,-._.,-~
, ,.-.-- 8' $ 0.01 $ 4.22
. , '
-'.,A.
:.,; $ 0.01 $ 4.23
,':~~ $ 0.01 $ 4.24
"9: ' $ 0.01 $ 4.25
'__;...._7
'lrS30 $ 0.01 $ 4.26
...--.'--.."
9' 53 $ 0.01 $ 4.27
....--...,
9"S16 $ 0.01 $ 4.28
,t_.__
9.S99 $ 0.01 $ 4.29
9'.922 $ 0.01 $ 4.30
9.94~ $ 0.01 $ 4.31
9.969 $ 0.01 $ 4.32
9.992 $ 0.01 $ 4.33
10.015 $ 0.01 $ 4.34
10.038 $ 0.01 $ 4.35
10.061 $ 0.01 $ 4.36
10.064 $ 0.01 $ 4.37
10.107 $ 0.01 $ 4.38
10.130 $ 0.01 $ 4.39
10.153 $ 0.01 $ 4.40
10.176 $ 0.01 $ 4.41
10.200 $ 0.01 $ 4.42
10.223 $ 0.01 $ 4.43
10.246 $ 0.01 $ 4.44
10.2Q9 $ 0.01 S 4.45
10.292 $ 0.01 $ 4.46
10.315 $ 0.01 S 4.47
10.338 $ 0.01 $ 4.48
10.361 $ 0.01 $ 4.49
10:384 $ 0.01 $ 4.~0
100407 $ 0.01 $ 4.51
10.431 $ 0.01 $ 4.52
10,454 $ 0.01 $ 4.53
10..477 $ 0.01 $ 4.54
10.500 $ 0.01 $ 4.5~
to..m $ 0.01 $ 4.~6
10.M6 $ 0.01 $ 4.57
10..569 $ 0.01 $ 4.58
10.~92 $ 0.01 $ 4.59
10.61~ $ 0.01 $ 4.60
Exhibit S-A
Attachment A-2a.2
Base Soil Price Per Cubic Yardr$ 7.221
10.638 $ 0.01 $ 4.61
1m $ 0.01 $ 4.62
1o.ee.11 $ 0.01 $ 4.63
','10)0.: $ 0.01 $ 4.64
"0' t $ 0.01 $ 4.65
t , $ 0.01 $ 4.66
-
..,....,.
,~.". . - $ 0.01 $ 4.67
.' -
f''',- - $ 0.01 $ 4.68
;>", -
"IS' $ 0.01 $ 4.69
, ,
.
,~,. $ 0.01 $ 4.70
'''-'--
<.11ll 19. $ 0.01 $ 4.71
- ---~ ," t -,a!lZ $ 0.01 $ 4.72
:1Q:[1!! $ 0.01 $ 4.73
to:!l39 $ 0.01 $ 4.74
10!l62 $ 0.01 $ 4.75
t...
10;gS5 $ 0.01 $ 4.76
11.006 $ 0.01 $ 4.77
11.031 $ 0.01 $ 4.78
11.054 $ 0.01 $ 4.79
11.077 $ 0.01 $ 4.80.
11.100. $ 0.01 $ 4.61
11.123 $ 0.01 $ 4.62
11.147 $ 0.01 $ 4.83
11.170 $ 0.01 $ 4.84
11.193 $ 0.01 $ 4.65
11.216 $ 0.01 $ 4.86
11.239 $ 0.01 S 4.87
11.262 $ 0.01 $ 4.88
11.265 $ 0.01 $ 4.89
11.30S $ 0.01 $ 4.90.
11.331 $ 0.01 $ 4.91
11.354 $ 0.01 $ 4.92
11.371 .$ 0.01 $ 4.93
11.40.1 $ 0.01 $ 4.94
11.424 $ 0.01 $ 4.95
11.447 $ 0.01 S 4.96
11.470 $ 0.01 S 4.97
11.493 $ 0.01 $ 4.98
11.516 $ 0.01 $ 4.99
11.539 $ 0.Q1 $ 5.0.0.
11.562 $ 0.01 S 5.0.1
Naples LF _Escalation Rates.Rev1G-09 (2).xls .. Soil Pricing - Soil Only
.
-
Naples Landfill
Exhibit 5-A
Attachment A-2b
Base Soil Price Per Cubic Yardl $
Annual Assumed Tons:
Base Rate for Soil Reimbursement:L$
5011 Pricing Escalallon Methodology
Sol '0 j;
;. _'<f'_ ,'-
" ~"
,.."
~iiij, _, iii;;.
,. :c.
i~':".'" .
,..,
;m'l,1~'8! [, $
4~'
11~!'r7ft"!7~~ " $
li:';i'''..;foiilOOJ
::r~,??i>}~- " $
"r;:,...~ <
:,'<'1,"I',,"T $
,,'.''':'';;'';' '
,:::,:::::~~.:; -" ..~, $
::,':"::;~r,:2!1I'.: $
2J!:B::l:t $
, "'5:882 $
"....--..-,
. '11.~3 $
. ~g-23' $
, M54 $
5,98,5 $
6:016 $
6.047 $
6,078 $
6,109 $
14
~'14 $$
.~lTQ,
,Mo'! $
6;232 $
6,~ $
. ,If. '9'f $
.6~ $
6.356 $
M86 $
6.41.7 $
M48 $
6.479 $
6;510 $
6.5Al $
6,572 $
. 6'60
. ",.3 $
, M3.3 $
6',ll64 $
.6.6.911 $
, . 6;726 $
fJ.7fi7. $
=41, 6,7.6.6 $
. . $
.;->,.'<_<i., .I
,.d!:85ll; $
. ..< "11.1l $
.., ".:"'-"1 $
.,("t,,,dil!':iil.L;
,..~'" ~ $
_;"",;;"W,(; .4:.
.::r~ $
"~::::;,~,~~~ $
:'.':::;~~:~J~03ff: $
, ;". alf $
. '''''7.'0"7. $
',;;;~r.,~.,,,~ j,
, '. ~7;127: $
7-.158 $
7,189 $
.-
Base Ratel
Rate
Increase
Cumulative
Rate
Cumulative
Rate
(0.01) $
0.01) $
0.01 $
(0.01 $
(0.01 $
0.01 $
0.D1 $
0.01 $
0.01) $
(0,01 $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01 $
(0.01) $
(0.01 $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01 $
(0.01 $
0.01) $
0.D1 $
(0.01 $
0.01) $
0.01 $
(0.01 $
(0.01) $
(0.01 $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
-W.01) $
(0.01 $
(0.01) $
(0.01 $
-W.01) $
(0.01 $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
1.83
1.84
1.85
1.86
1.87
1.88
1.89
1.90
1.91
1.92
1.93
1.94
1.95
1.96
1.97
1.98
1.99
2.00
2.01
2.02
2.03
2.04
2.05
2.06
2.07
2.08
2.09
2.10
2.11
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.20
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.24
2.25
2.26
2.27
2.28
2.29
2.30
2.31
2.32
2.33
'-"'M;~'I1 Jt 0 $ 2.34
'.""';<;;'
,.~,~ $ 0.01 $ 2.35
t'.'.' .
,,'~ 8'2' $ 0.01 $ 2.36
::..-.';j,,' '~"'1Il3:l;!' $ 0.01 $ 2.37
~ll
""'77:r $ 0.01 $ 2.38
.:';';'1'3 ~.. $ 0.01 $ 2.39
"-,h'_','. .'.
,''':.7'4.05 $ 0.01 $ 2.40
',;,r1~ff3(i< $ 0.01 $ 2.41
.:~I $ 0.01 $ 2.42
.,J. .S, $ 0.01 $ 2.43
'7:529 $ 0.01 $ 2.44
, -.-._.
7.~~Q $ 0.01 $ 2.45
, 7.~QQ $ 0.01 $ 2.46
7:$2.1 $ 0.01 $ 2.47
7.652 $ 0.01 $ 2.48
7,.6.83 $ 0.01 $ 2.49
',.t.7J4 $ 0.01 $ 2.50
.:~:195 $ 0.01 $ 2.51
.:m.78 $ 0.01 $ 2.52
7.ell7 $ 0.01 $ 2.53
7: 37 $ 0.01 $ 2.54
''-;'''...,'1.._.,.,
'7,;8.9S $ 0.01 $ 2.55
:7;8,9.9 $ 0.01 $ 2.56
7.930 $ 0.01 $ 2.57
. 7..961 $ 0.01 $ 2.58
:1.992' $ 0.01 $ 2.59
" 8023 $ 0.01 $ 2.60
,',....."..,
.8,054 $ 0.01 $ 2.61
.. MM $ 0.01 $ 262
. Slm $ 0.01 $ 2.63
S:.146 $ 0.01 $ 2.64
..... san $ 0.01 $ 2.65
.....~6 $. 0.01 $ 2.66
Cfi9 $ 0.01 $ 2.67
. ... g,
):'~m- $ 0.01 $ 2.68
$ 0.01 $ 2.69
,....:.'.-..----...
)S;331' $ 0.01 $ 2.70
";1 $ 0.01 $ 2.71
"'6 .. 3' $ 0.01 $ 2.72
.",!;j.... ,
"'''''!F.4 ".. $ 0.01 $ 2.73
!.,.'-.l'ifH.. -,
.'''. $~45Jl $ 0.01 $ 2.74
,.....,"''^" .b_' ""
. ''''',alaIl:6 $ 0.01 $ 2.75
,.,.'.. ,
, ~...;... - ,. ..,
;.,1':" .. fl' $ 0.01 $ 2.76
';J,;,.. .:',"
.',,'''8" '" $ 0.01 $ 2.77
.'.,-.
'..,. ,
'.'<;;'.
"8' !l. $ 0.01 $ 2.78
".::\::.:'.. '.
...."-",,,..-
i'--.-"/'"'.8'1: oil; $ 0.01 $ 2.79
;...',"\OL..~, ....~o $ 0.01 $ 2.80
,'.', ,
,;. ,.--,"",. ~"..,._:_"
'10'8'6'1:1' $ 0.01 $ 2.81
'."",..:' . / .~
. .... '8'102 $ 0.01 $ 2.82
,.,'oJ. "
. .
'." .
'. S;733 $ 0.01 $ 2.83
Naples LF _Escalation Rates.Revl0.09 (2).xis, Soil Pricing" Seil & PS Only
----,
,-,,~.., ". ,-,,~.~-~--
, .,~._~ ---,.,._-.'.~
7.221
219,100
2.34)'
Basa Ratel
Rate
Increase
Cumulative
Rate
;..,'i.,.," .. $ 0.01 $ 2.84
.,,,-;>i,~,
"~""'m . $ 0.01 $ 2.85
'.'" .
4'"",,,,_ , ..
~r',: $ 0.01 $ 2.86
:SJ'J~>
~;<"",,:" . $ 0.01 $ 2.87
.",,:j:;,.y
'''"8'8a1 $ 0.01 $ 2.88
",,~,J~11 .!.
'S' l $ 0.01 $ 2.89
'..,~,i:.._,W_
.) 8" . $ 0.01 $ 2.90
,_.,. .~;r
"!1;9S0: $ 0.01 $ 2.91
" 9:010 $ 0.01 $ 2.92
.....9:0,4.1 $ 0.01 $ 2.93
9:072 $ 0.01 $ 2.94
9:103 $ 0.01 $ 2.95
9,134 $ 0.01 $ 2.96
9.165 $ 0.01 $ 2.97
9,196 $ 0.01 $ 2.98
9.227 $ 0.01 $ 2.99
9,257 $ 0.01 $ 3.00
".921)8 $ 0.01 $ 3.01
'm
. g;~.9 $ 0.01 $ 3.02
9\3$9 $ 0.01 $ 3.03
9.$1!1' $ 0.01 $ 3.04
. 9:1112 $ 0.01 $ 3.05
9;'413 $ 0.01 $ 3.06
9:4U $ 0.01 $ 3.07
.. 9.90.4 $ 0.01 $ 3.08
9,53.5 $ 0.01 $ 3.09
'.9586 $ 0.01 $ 3.10
..'..--.-.,
9,597 $ 0.01 $ 3,11
9:6211 $ 0.01 $ 3.12
9.6$9 $ 0.01 $ 3.13
9.($,90 $ 0.01 $ 3.14
9~1.2.t $ 0.01 $ 3.15
.9.15.1 $ 0.01 $ 3.16
9i7!!;! $ 0.01 $ 3.17
\1;1).1$ $ 0.01 $ 3.18
"'9aM $ 0.01 $ 3.19
,',... J."",.
'1);5 $ 0.01 $ 3.20
'. 9,(7.
... [!tOli $ 0.01 $ 3.21
;.-,,- $ 0.01 $ 3.22
;,..~;_t $ 0.01 $ 3.23
'...9;. . $ 0.01 $ 3.24
; .I! .
"
.,.,-....."..,-
':l.o':0~ " $ 0.01 $ 3.25
'''111: 0' $ 0.01 $ 3.26
....-._,_.~._",.'"
;';1.,lat; $ 0.01 $ 3.27
.,,.;_1 , $ 0.01 $ 3.28
..
"'.'1' --.., $ 0.01 $ 3.29
;. ' 1 .;
.....". ;.'. IIlI .
'..1.~. , $ 0.01 $ 3.30
'l~\1" $ 0.01 $ 3.31
;',..L__ .;
"10: ~, $ 0.01 $ 3.32
., 111:2.1($ $ 0.01 $ 3.33
to.307 $ 0.01 $ 3.34
,,_.~ , _...-
Naples Landfill
Soil Pricing Escalation Methodology
:tOt33B $ 0.01 $ 3.35
, cll1' (I $ 0.01 $ 3.36
..,..,.-.,~',~ ~ .,;,
.....'" " ~O $ 0.01 $ 3.37
,,,,,,,,~.,,,,,, ',-. 1; $ 0.01 $ 3.38
~"rl!.',
mv~;;':'<!i: 1) $ 0.01 $ 3.39
~~Iii.."
""~~..,~ ~ $ 0.01 $ 3.40
",~.-~
~\o~V ., $ 0.01 $ 3.41
~
~:~,.. . $ 0.01 $ 3.42
.
.
" $ 0.01 $ 3.43
i.idi- -"
. . $ 0.01 $ 3.44
"..,..,
",. $ 0.01 $ 3.45
.
,..,,~. 7/ $ 0.01 $ 3.46
"";,!)",l
: ,,''l''.,., P $ 0.01 $ 3.47
_k,.,""..
.".-,"".,...,^ ;1.rg $ 0.01 $ 3.48
",.-.,',
, ,::'1Ol7.10 $ 0.01 $ 3.49
::1!f;6Q:l $ 0.01 $ 3.50
'. . Jo'P32 $ 0.01 $ 3.51
..1...-
. JO:6113 $ 0.01 $ 3.52
10:694 ' $ 0.01 $ 3.53
10:924 $ 0.01 $ 3.54
1 Q.955 $ 0.01 $ 3.55
.1Q.986 $ 0.01 $ 3.56
11.017 $ 0.01 $ 3.57
11.048 $ 0.01 $ 3.56
11.079 $ 0.01 $ 3.59
11:110 $ 0.01 $ 3.60
11.141 $ 0.01 $ 3.61
11'.171 $ 0.01 $ 3.62
11:202 $ 0.01 $ 3.63
11233 $ 0.01 $ 3.64
.'..-'-
11.2!l4 $ 0.01 $ 3.65
11.295 $ 0.01 $ 3.66
11.326 $ 0.01 $ 3.67
11.357 $ 0.01 $ 3.68
11.366 $ 0.01 $ 3.69
11.416 $ 0.01 $ 3.70
11.449 $ 0.01 $ 3.71
11:480 $ 0.01 $ 3.72
11.511 $ 0.01 $ 3.73
11.$42 $ 0.01 $ 3.74
11.673 $ 0.01 $ 3.75
11@4 $ 0.01 $ 3.76
11.634 $ 0.01 $ 3.77
11.666 $ 0.01 $ 3.78
11.698 $ 0.01 $ 3.79
11.727 $ 0.01 $ 3.80
11.756 $ 0.01 $ 3.81
Exhibit S,A
Attachment A-2b.2
Base Soil Price Per Cubic Yerdl $ 7.221
" 11" all $ 0.01 $ 3.82
-'" .. ~, 'tj 2tl $ 0.01 $ 3.83
". ,~' -
.....-4,.-._",__ !.'
"'''';!: ~ Ii $ 0.01 $ 3.84
'.-,.,..-.",
'.:,j'"
,."''1:"!'.' , . . ~ $ 0.01 $ 3.85
, , .
",,\'- . $ 0.01 $ 3.86
'"' ,
.
~.-..-:'- ! $ 0.01 $ 3.87
.
",'.'$:'- r $ 0.01 $ 3.88
--4b<. .
~,.~.,. .- ! $ 0.01 $ 3.89
0.-....
;T--.r: $ 0.01 $ 3.90
".., ,
n'''' . $ 0.01 $ 3.91
"~";. .
",,"r $ 0.01 $ 3.92
;.<<... "
.....1 $ 0.01 $ 3.93
,
"..",." . ,.'
."~.',- g $ 0.01 $ 3.94
'.
,..,.
, "1 ',90 $ 0.01 $ 3.95
."",,- '"" ~
~J2,~"1 $ 0.01 $ 3.96
. 12:252 $ 0.01 $ 3.97
_.....---
12.:283 $ 0.01 $ 398
12-'.31'1 $ 0.01 $ 3.99
12.3M $ 0.01 $ 4.00
12.375 $ 0.01 $ 4.01
12.408 $ 0.01 $ 4.02
12.437 $ 0.01 $ 4.03
12.468 $ 0.01 $ 404
12..499 $ 0.01 $ 4.05
12.530 $ 0.01 $ 4.06
12:$61 $ 0.01 $ 4.07
12591 $ 0.01 $ 4.08
---'-.. ..-
,12,622 $ 0.01 $ 4.09
12:653 $ 0.01 $ 4.10
12;ell4 $ 0.01 $ 4.11
12.715 $ 0.01 $ 4.12
12.7.46 $ 0.01 $ 4.13
12.777 $ 0.01 $ 4.14
12.608 $ 0.01 $ 4.15
12:538 $ 0.01 $ 4.16
12.869 $ 0.01 $ 4.17
12.900 $ 0.01 $ 4.18
12.931 $ 0.01 $ 4.19
12.962 $ 0.01 $ 4.20
12.993 $ 0.01 $ 4.21
13.024 $ 0.01 $ 4.22
Naples LF _Escalation Rates-RevI0-09 (2).xls. Soil Pricln9 - Soli & PS Only
-
Naple. Landfill
5011 Pricing Escalation Methodology
Per ton indexed rates when Soil and Mulch a
-
~;fo~r Base Ralel
Rate Cumulative
tl
Increase Rale
-"".,:-_...,Jt k.~:
":H't':'~;<Nq~I'~':'
'~','"
..di:..,. ., '"'.":',.
""Y"'1!l!li!i $ (0.01) $ 1.37
'='.'.
":"C"il:' Yi $ (0,01) $ 1.38
"-..'.-,'.', '
',._,...",.,b,_, :i
'''~'''~~'~'6 -,. $ 0.01) $ 1.39
."',-...". "
,.:~"',;'.",,' ..,
.:......'.'::iI'il5(l $ 0.01 $ 1.40
;,-,,::,.::;;;';,.'...:._...
:...~ \':if;1lO2 $ 0,01 $ 1.41
""."11'853 $ 0.01 $ 1.42
'.-'..',-.,.-...'..-"".......
,4;QPS: $ 0.01 $ 1.43
..4;Q5!l $ 0.01) $ 1.44
'S;QQs $ (0.01 $ 1.45
.M59 $ (0.01) $ 1.46
s;nO $ (0.01) $ 1.47
5:162 $ (0.01) $ 1.48
5:213 $ (0.01) $ 1.49
5,295 $ (0.01) $ 1.50
5.316 $ (0,01 $ 1.51
5,398 $ (0,01) $ 1.52
SA19 $ (0.01 $ 1.53
. 1M71 $ (0,01) $ 1.54
S.522 $ (0.01 $ 1.55
S.,574 $ (0,01) $ 1.56
....S;.Il25 $ (0.01) $ 1.57
. '5:1379 $ (0.01) $ 1.58
.....5.728 $ (0.01 $ 1.59
.5.7.79 $ (0.01) $ 1.60
5.831 $ (0.Q1 $ 1.61
'. 5.862 $ (0.01 $ 1.62
5.934 $ (0.01) $ 1.63
5;985 $ (0.01 $ 1.64
6.037 $ (0.01 $ 1.65
6.088 $ (0.01) $ 1.66
6.140 $ (0.01) $ 1.67
6:H11 $ 10.01) $ 1.68
9,Z,12 $ 0.01) $ 1.69
8:29J1 $ 0.01) $ 1.70
8;3.4.5 $ (0.01) S 1.71
M9'7 $ (0.01) $ 1.72
'. 9rM8 $ (0.01) $ 1.73
11l11!)o $ (001) $ 1.74
., &:551: $ (0.01) S 1.75
6"9 ' $ fO.Ol $ 1.76
. ,..!lS'
',-' H..!lJl~ $ (0.01) S 1.77
"8' 00
.....Im: $ (0.01) S 1.78
. iTa1; $ ~.01 $ 1.79
."'C"
. ,&,-aoll $ (0.01 $ 1.80
. _-""BT 0 $ (0.01) $ 1.81
",-.,.,' . .
:a;!l11' $ (0.01) $ 1.82
, .- ""~_,.J:. -."
,-co '&i~3 $ (0.01) $ 1.83
.. :1:[{4 $ (0.01) $ 1.84
..
Toila $ (0.01) $ 1.85
",'. -~. .-
7:111 $ (0.01) $ 1.86
7.169. $ (0.01) $ 1.87
-
Exhibit 5.A
Attachment A-2c
Base Soil Price Per Cubic Yard I $
Annual Assumed Tons;
Base Rale for Soil Reimbursementl $
re used. (No Posl.Sheil)
SoH e/j.~ Base Ratel
I~ Rale Cumulative
,.mn;.. Increase Rate
""'m!!l' 0 $ 1,88
,.-.,.... -t
,-,~,~~- ,
.'''''1'.''1' '1: $ 0.Q1 $ 1.89
....o;,Jt...:, ,
'..,m;'"'! M $ 0.01 $ 1.90
,;'}.-t;,,~' .
'.~";71", , $ 0.01 $ 1.91
.
'.,.;,,,,,.,
,c1/ ~a $ 0.Q1 $ 1.92
.
-.. ..... 'C~ $ 0.01 $ 1.93
','-. ,.,.;,
,.., ..,..,,~...,
1i52~ $ 0.01 S 1.94
,..,' ..'. ,
-"..,,,....... -..
". ,580 $ 0.01 $ 1.95
~i $ 0.01 $ 1.96
.' 7,.'1183 $ 0.01 $ 1.97
1',735 $ 0.01 $ 1.98
7:786 $ 0.01 $ 1.99
7:637 $ 0.Q1 $ 2.00
7.889 $ 0.01 $ 2.01
7,9'40 $ 0.01 $ 2.02
7;992 $ 0.01 $ 2.03
6;043 $ 0.01 $ 2.04
8'.095. $ 0.01 $ 205
. 81'14'6. $ 0.01 $ 2.06
,-"..,.
11:198 $ 0.01 $ 2.07
.6,2.49 $ 0.01 $ 2.08
6)3(lQ $ 0.01 $ 2.09
6,352 $ 0.01 $ 2.10
6)403 $ 0.01 $ 2.11
8L55 $ 0.01 $ 2.12
'.Mas $ 0.01 $ 2.13
6,556, $ 0.01 $ 2.14
8.'609 $ 0.01 $ 2.15
6.fl61 $ 0.01 $ 2.16
, $:712 $ 0.01 $ 2.17
. 8,764 $ 0.01 $ 2.18
,6.lIfs $ 0.01 $ 2.19
lJJl66 $ 0.01 $ 2.20
'. . ai918 $ 0.01 $ 2.21
8i96Q $ 0.01 $ 2.22
9:021 $ 0.01 $ 2.23
9,072 $ 0.01 $ 2.24
9.'124 $ 0.01 S 2.25
..9']17.5 $ 0.01 S 2.26
." 9;227, $ 0.01 $ 2.27
., ."ll',27cS. $ 0.01 S 2.28
.,Qi\l:30: $ 0.Q1 $ 2.29
"'9ian $ 0.01 $ 2.30
,lIZll32 $ 0.01 S 2.31
..91'l8ll. $ 0.01 S 2.32
'!I;llD' $ 0.Q1 $ 2.33
'-,. "",
'9',567: $ 0.01 $ 2.34
'9'638' $ 0.01 S 2.35
-. -..~.,....._"
. 9.990 $ 0.01 $ 2.36
9.741' $ 0.01 $ 2.37
Napies LF _Escalation Rates.Revl0.09 (2).xls. Soil Pricing, Soil, Mulch Only
~.".. '" .,
m.._,.....,,__,__._. _
7.221
219,100
1.881
Base Ratel
Rete Cumulative
Increase Rate
, ". '9;{, $ 0.01 $ 2.38
,."~,,.-,.,
".'f $ 0.01 $ 2.39
, ,
"11: " $ 0.01 $ 2.40
-,.,h.~'i."
''''lIJ'' . $ 0.01 $ 2.41
;'.:1.::-.-.: :.",
,.c""" \
, .
r:9J1Q[ $ 0.01 $ 2.42
:'1 ' . \I $ 0.Q1 $ 2.43
. ":,,,,.;...i.,.
. "jOTOl $ 0.01 $ 2.44
,..'-!I ._..,
. 10iI1l3 $ 0.Q1 $ 2.45
10;204 $ 0.01 $ 2.46
... .10;256 $ 0.01 $ 2.47
10::30,7 $ 0.01 $ 2.48
10.~59 $ 0.01 $ 2.49
1Ml0 $ 0.01 $ 2.50
10),46.1 $ 0.Q1 $ 2.51
10:513 $ 0.01 $ 2.52
10.&64 $ 0.01 $ 2.53
10.1>16 $ 0.01 $ 2.54
.llMls7 $ 0.01 $ 2.55
Joim $ 0.01 $ 2.56
1.0,170 $ 0.Q1 S 2.57
1Q:,l\22 $ 0.01 $ 2.58
10Il\73 $ 0.01 $ 2.59
10;924. $ 0.01 S 2.60
'10:976 $ 0.Q1 $ 2.61
11.027 $ 0.01 $ 2.62
11.079 $ 0.01 S 2.63
11.130 $ 0.Q1 $ 2.64
11\182 $ 0.01 $ 2.65
11.233 $ 0.Q1 S 2.66
1}.265 $ 0.01 $ 2.67
11.3.36 $ 0.01 $ 2.68
, 11'.38.11 $ 0.01 $ 2.69
11)439 $ 0.01 $ 2.70
...1,1',,(90: $ 0.01 $ 2.71
U)642 $ 0.01 $ 2.72
11',593 $ 0.01 $ 2.73
l1'llM! $ 0.01 $ 2.74
,.f. ..._.'
11' . $ 0.01 S 2.75
.6Q,6
'U~ $
. ,t JI 0.Q1 S 2.76
.I~4.~9 $ 0.01 $ 2.77
'C H'l!:sl $ 0.01 $ 2.78
,~..-."., A. ".,-",-
',:.Ui..902 $ 0.Q1 S 2.79
." H\9S4 $ 0.01 S 2.80
"",:.,- -' ., . .~.._;
". $ 0.Q1 S 2.81
'12' , $ 0.01 $ 2.82
',.. . '
.-",..- ~
'" Ii: $ 0.01 $ 2.83
" ,
"..'h.... _.
"1:zr:169' $ 0.01 $ 2.64
'!lm'
.. 12" l' S 0.01 $ 2.85
_<e,.,_ ,_ '_c,
"12'262' $ 0.01 $ 2.86
t ....._,
12:3]~ $ 0.01 $ 2.87
12,365' $ 0.01 $ 2.88
. ~"--"'--- -
".__...~_.."--,--,.,.".,--
Naples Landfill
5011 Pricing Escalation Methodology
i.;'~;~J,jJ "" $ 0.01 $ 2.89
,,::'''1rr. , , $ 0.01 $ 2.90
,,""'.,......,- .
~~"~1; .91 $ 0.01 $ 2.91
!.".ccli-'.,
_b""._'~_
"~'~~:jj $ 0.01 $ 2,92
'.i;~~....
'"w~l , , $ 0.01 $ 2.93
,~.
""'t-'- $ 0.01 $ 2.94
~"
" '. $ 0.01 $ 2.95
.-;!l'
., [,i. $ 0.01 $ 2.96
. $ 0.01 $ 2.97
~', ,
, .
"'~-'f: Q) $ 0.01 $ 2.98
- .,.,
,.. '
,-.,.". $ 0.01 $ 2.99
"..'Wo'_ ,
._<~v.
'''1''1'''''''''' 3: $ 0.01 S 3.00
'.';":.;';'2-
"..,_..~,,"- , $ 0.01 $ 3.01
":. .
.".,..."""", ,
'..0_'."'''''. liS $ 0.01 $ 3.02
'. .,.:;;.;,
, '3'f37 $ 0.01 $ 3.03
-",'; ,,"'. ~", ;;,
','1.$]ell $ 0.01 $ 3.04
1~)2'10 $ 0.01 $ 3.05
13;~91 $ 0.01 $ 3.06
1,(1';3:,43 $ 0.01 $ 3.07
13;394 $ 0.01 $ 3.08
13;448 $ 0.01 $ 3.09
13';497 $ 0.01 $ 3.10
13.$49 $ 0.01 $ 3.11
lMOO $ 0.01 $ 3.12
13.,661 $ 0.01 $ 3.13
,13)103 $ 0.01 $ 3.14
13'as,j' $ 0.01 $ 3.15
IteO!! $ 0.01 $ 3.16
13..e57 $ 0.01 $ 3.17
13909 $ 0.01 $ 3.18
...',.
13~aeo $ 0.01 $ 3.19
14;012 $ 0.01 $ 3.20
--...--,
1:4.063 $ 0.01 $ 3.21
14;114 $ 0.01 $ 3.22
14\1&6 $ 0.01 $ 3.23
14;217 $ 0.01 $ 3.24
14;269 $ 0.01 $ 3.25
14.320 $ 0.01 $ 3.26
14m2 $ 0.01 $ 3.27
14A23 $ 0.01 $ 3.28
14}<l75 $ 0.01 $ 3.29
14;526 $ 0.01 $ 3.30
f4,678 $ 0.01 $ 3.31
14.629 $ 0.01 $ 3.32
1.4.680 $ 0.01 $ 3.33
14:732 $ 0.01 $ 3.34
14.783 $ 0.01 $ 3.35
Exhibit 5.A
Attachment A-2c.2
Base Soil Price Per Cubic Yardl $ 7.221
:.lll:eil5: $ 0.01 $ 3.36
':["'886' $ 0.01 $ 3.37
-';"'.';>;'.. ._.0
, ..~. , 38; $ 0.01 $ 3.38
'~.;.,:,
'''',J' !lJ , $ 0.01 $ 3.39
,,;.,... -
'-.;">~ :1$ 0.01 $ 3.40
~"",.,
-_,l"~r" -- " $ 0.01 $ 3.41
',M ,.
...."':1] $ 0.01 $ 3.42
I...,
,...- .
^"'. . $ 0.01 $ 3.43
"" .
.-
" $ 0.01 $ 3.44
"."
_;.>>1.l
, , tI$ 0.01 $ 3.45
'"
',,','.li.
i"':.'~- - , $ 0.01 $ 3.46
,..,,,. "
"'1 , $ 0.01 $ 3.47
,.,
,..--.- ..
152' $ 0.01 $ 3.48
--,~ ,--,
i'sild $ 0.01 $ 3.49
';, . j~ ~ '
. lQil,sll $ 0.01 $ 3.50
le:' .7 $ 0.01 $ 3.51
16:858 $ 0.01 $ 3.52
15;IQ9 $ 0.01 $ 3.53
15;781 $ 0.01 $ 3.54
15.812 $ 0.01 $ 3.55
15.8P.4 $ 0.01 $ 3.55
15.915 $ 0.01 $ 3.57
15.987 $ 0.01 $ 3.58
16.018 $ 0.01 $ 3.59
16.070 $ 0.01 $ 3.60
16..121 $ 0.01 $ 3.61
16:173 $ 0.01 $ 3.62
16:224 $ 0.01 $ 3.63
16.275 $ 0.01 $ 3.64
16:327 $ 0.01 $ 3.65
16.378 $ 0.01 $ 3.66
16.430 $ 0.01 $ 3.67
16;.481 $ 0.01 $ 3.68
16.533 $ 0.01 $ 3.69
16.584 $ 0.01 S 3.70
16.636 $ 0.01 S 3.71
16.687 $ 0.01 $ 3.72
16.738 $ 0.01 $ 3.73
16.790 $ 0.01 $ 3.74
16.841 $ 0.01 S 3.75
16.893 $ 0.01 $ 3.76
Naples LF _Escalation Rates-Rev10.09 (2).xls - Soil Pricin9 . Soil. Muich Only
Exhibit 5-A
- Attachment A,2d
Naples Landfill
Soli Pricing Escalation Methodology Base Soil Price Per Cubic Yardl $ 7.221
Annual Assumed Tons: 219,100
Base Rate for Soil Reimbursementl $ . 1.401
Per ton indexed rates when Soil and Pas i-Shell and Mulch are used.
f .Base Rate! Base Rate! " Base Rate!
". Ra!~ Cumulative .I~ate Cumulative Rate Cumulative
Increase Rate ,<Increase Rate . I'ncrease' Rate
.....(0,01) $ 0.89 0 S 1.40 $' 0.01 $ 1.90
".0.01 $ 0.90 $" . 0.01 $ 1.41 $" '0.01 $ 1.91
0,01 $ 0.91 $ 0;01 $ 1.42 $ 0.01 $ 1.92
(0,01 $ 0.92 $ 0.01 $ 1.43 $ 0.01 $ 1.93
0.01 $ 0.93 $ 0.01 $ 1.44 $ 0.01 $ 1.94
0.01 $ 0.94 .$ 0,01 $ 1.45 $ 0.01 $ 1.95
0.01 $ 0.95 $ 0.01 $ 1.46 '$ 0.01 $ 1.96
0.01) $ 0.96 $ 0.01 $ 1.47 $ 0.01 $ 1.97
0.01) $ 0.97 $ 0.01 $ 1.48 $ 0.01 $ 1.96
0.D1 $ 0.98 $ 0.01 $ 1.49 $ 0.D1 $ 1.99
(0.01 $ 0.99 $ 0.01 $ 1.50 , $ 0.01 $ 2.00
(0.01) $ 1.00 $ 0.01 $ 1.51 $ 0.01 $ 2.01
(0.01) $ 1.01 $ 0.01 $ 1.52 $ 0.01 $ 2.02
0.01) $ 1.02 $ 0.01 $ 1.53 $ 0.01 $ 2.03
0.01) $ 1.03 $ om $ 1.54 $ 0.01 $ 2.04
0.01) $ 1.04 $ 0.01 $ 1.55 v $ 0.01 $ 2.05
(0.01) $ 1.05 $ om $ 1.56 $ om $ 2.06
(0.01) $ 1.06 $ 0.01 $ 1.57 $ 0.01 $ 2.07
0.01' $ 1.07 $ 0.01 $ 1.58 $ . 0.D1 $ 2.06
- $ $ 0.01 $ . '$' $
om 1.08 1.59 0.D1 2.09
0,01) $ 1.09 $ 0.01 $ 1.60 $ . 0.D1 $ 2.10
0.D1) $ 1.10 ~ $ 0.01 S 1.61 $ 0,01 $ 2.11
om $ 1.11 , $ 0.D1 . $ 1.62 $. 0.01 $ 2.12
(0.01- S 1.12 $ 0.01 $ 1.63 :i( $ 0.01 $ 2.13
0.01) $ 1.13 $ 0.01. $ 1.64 $ 0,01 $ 2.14
0.D1) $ 1.14 $ 0.01 S 1.65 $ 0.01 $ 2.15
(0.01 $ 1.15 $ 0;01 $ 1.66 $ 0.01 $ 2.16
0,01) $ 1.16 $ 0,01 $ 1.67 $. 0:01 $ 2.17
'.
0:01) $ 1.17 $ 0.01 $ 1.68 $ 0.01 $ 2.16
0.01) $ 1.18 $ 0.01 $ 1.69 $ 0.D1 $ 2.19
(0.01 $ 1.19 $ 0.01 $ 1.70 $ 0.01 $ 2.20
0.01) $ 1.20 $ 0.01 $ 1.71 $ 0.01 $ 2,21
(0.01 $ 1.21 $ 0.01 $ 1.72 $ 0.D1 $ 2.22
(0.01 . $ 1.22 .$ 0.01 $ 1.73 $ 0.01 S 2.23
(0.01 S 1.23 $ 0.01 5 1.74 $ 0.01 5 2.24
(0.01 $ 1.24 $ 0.01 $ 1.75 $ 0.01 $ 2.25
(0.01 $ 1.25 $ 0.01 $ 1.76 $ 0.01 $ 2.26
0:01 $ 1.26 $ 0.01 $ 1.77 $ 0.01 $ 2.27
(0.01) $ 1.27 $ 0.01 $ 1.78 $ 0.01 $ 2.28
. (0,01 $ 1.28 ;$ 0.D1 $ 1.79 $ 0.01 $ 2.29
(0:01) $ 1.29 $ 0.01 $ 1.80 ..$. 0.01 $ 2.30
0.01) $ 1.30 $. O.ot $ 1.81 '$ 0.01 $ 2.31
(0.01 $ 1.31 .$ 0.01 $ 1.82 $ 0.D1 $ 2.32
0.01 $ 1.32 $ 0.01 $ 1.83 '$' 0.01 $ 2.33
0.D1 $ 1.33 $ 0.01 $ 1.84 $ . 0.01 $ 2.34
0.D1 $ 1.34 '$ 0.01 $ 1.85 $ 0.01 $ 2.35
(0.01 $ 1.35 $ 0.01 $ 1.86 $. 0.01 $ 2.36
(0.01 $ 1.36 $ 0.01 $ 1.87 $' 0.01 $ 2.37
0,01 $ 1.37 $ 0.01 $ 1.88 $ 0.01 $ 2.38
0.01 $ 1.38 $ 0.D1 $ 1.89 $ 0.01 $ 2.39
(0.01 $ 1.39 $' . 0.D1 $ 2.40
Naples LF _Escalation Rates.l1 -3-09 Ijb.xls . Soil Pricing - Soil. Mulch & PS
.......m'_'..
.
".,.-.","' ,. ,--,
Exhibit 5-A
Attachment A-2d.2
Naples Landfill
Soli Pricing Escalation Methodology Base Soil Price Per Cubic Yardl $ 7.221
$ 0.01 $ 2.41 0.01 $ 2.88
$ .0.01 $ 2.42 0.01 $ 2.89
$ 0.01 $ 2.43 . 0.01 $ 2.90
$. 0;01 $ 2.44 0.01 $ 2.91
$ . 0.01 $ 2.45 0.Q1 $ 2.92
.$ .'. 0.01 $ 2.46 0.01, $ 2.93
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.47 0.01 $ 2.94
$ 0.01 $ 2.48 0.Q1 $ 2.95
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.49 0.Q1 . $ 2.96
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.50 . 0.Q1 $ 2.97
$ 0,'01 $ 2.51 0;01 $ 2.98
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.52 0.01 $ 2.99
$ 0.01 $ 2.53 0.Q1 $ 3.00
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.54 0.Q1 $ 3.01
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.55 0.01 $ 3.02
$ 0.Q1 $ 2,56 0.01 $ 3.03
.$ 0.01 $ 2.57 0.01 $ 3.04
$ 0.01 $ 2.58 0.01 $ 3.05
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.59 0.Q1 $ 3.06
$ 0.01 $ 2.60 0.Q1 $ 3.07
$ 0.01 $ 2.61 0.Q1 $ 3.08
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.62 0.01 $ 3.09
. $ 0.Q1 $ 2.63 0.01 $ 3.10
$ 0.01 $ 2.64 0.Q1 $ 3.11
$ 0.01 $ 2.65 0.01 $ 3.12
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.66 0.Q1 $ 3.13
$ 0.01 $ 2.67 0.Q1 $ 3.14
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.66 0.01 $ 3.15
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.69 0.Q1 $ 3.16
$ 0.01 $ 2.70 0.01 $ 3.17
$ 0.01 $ 2.71 0.01 $ 3.18
$ 0.01 $ 2.72 0.01 $ 3.19
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.73 0.01 $ 3.20
$ 0.01 $ 2.74 0.01 $ 3.21
.$ 0.Q1 $ 2.75 0.Q1 $ 3.22
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.76 0.01 $ 3.23
$ 0.01 $ 2.77 0.01 $ 3.24
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.78 0.Q1 $ 3.25
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.79 0.01 $ 3.26
$ 0.01 $ 2.80. 0.01 $ 3.27
$ 0.01 $ 2.81 0.01 S 3.28
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.82
$ 0.01 $ 2.83
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.84
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.85
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.86
$ 0.Q1 $ 2.87
Naples LF _Escalation Rates.11.3.09 Ijb.xls. Soil Pricing. Soil, Mulch & PS
.
~-'.,
Naples Landfill
Exhibit 5-A
Attachment A-3
Assumed Base Rate:1 S
Posl-Shell Escalation Methodology Annual Assumed Tons:
Base Rate for Posi-Shell Reimbursement {Per Ton):1 S
Per ton indexed rates Posi.Shell is used.
974.00 I
219,100
0.721
. .
Posl-Shell Cumuiative
p"
,d~. Base Rate Rate
"."",.<-."," """'.~;.'" -
.',. -.-,.."~,,,,j,""":.:':.
.. :,.;11..20",11.; $ (0.01 $ 0.59
"83. !t $ (0.01) $ 0.60
,:. .._.._... .I__.~
. '..,- $ (0.01) $ 0.61
,
>~.,,',
. ....ll . ,~!I $ (0.01 $ 0.62
"; 8' .:~a. $ 10.01 $ 0.63
. 87l1,7 . $ (0.01) $ 0.64
.11
8!U:54 $ (0.01) $ 0.65
90M2 $ (0.01) $ 0.66
915.10 $ (0.01) $ 0.67
926:88 $ (0.01) $ 0.68
938.66 $ (0.01 $ 0.69
950.44 $ (001) $ 0.70
962.22 $ (0.01) $ 0.71
914.00 $ 0.72 $ 0.72
985.78 $ 0.01 $ 0.73
997.56 $ 0.01 $ 0.74
1,009.34 $ 0.01 $ 0.75
1,021.12 $ 0.01 $ 0.76
1,032.90 $ 0.01 $ 0.77
1.044.68 $ 0.01 $ 0.76
1,056.46 $ 0.01 $ 0.79
1,068:24 $ 0.01 $ 0.80
1,080.02 $ 0.01 $ 0.81
1,091.80 $ 0.01 $ 0.82
1,103.58 $ 0.01 $ 0.83
1,115.35 $ 0.01 $ 0.84
1,127.13 $ 0.01 $ 0.85
1,138.91 $ 0.01 $ 0.86
1,150.69 $ 0.01 $ 0.87
1,162.47 $ 0.01 $ 0.88
1,174.25 $ 0.01 $ 0.89
1,186.03 $ 0.01 $ 0.90
1,197.81 $ 0,01 $ 0.91
1,20g.59 $ 0.01 $ 0.92
1,221.37 $ 0.01 $ 0.93
1,233.15 $ 0.01 $ 0.94
1,244.93 $ 0.01 $ 0.95
1,256.71 $ 0.01 $ 0.96
1,268.49 $ 0.01 $ 0.97
1,280.27 $ 0.01 $ 0.98
1,292.05 $ 0.01 $ 0.99
1,303.83 $ 0.01 $ 1.00
'..-"
Posl-Shell Cumulative
'''':''j'C,' Base Rate Rate
Pnce
1315.61 $ 0.01 $ 1.01
f.;\:l.7;3.9 $ 0.01 $ 1.02
. f33.11. $ 0.01 $ 1.03
M~9S $ 0.01 $ 1.04
. 1 3Eml;t $ 0.01 $ 1.05
1:37.'l\sl $ 0.01 $ 1.06
1,386.28 $ 0.01 $ 1.07
1 3gll..06 $ 0.01 $ 1.08
14.09.11.4 $ 0.01 $ 1.09
f 42.1:62 $ 0.01 $ 1.10
1 433';40 $ 0.01 $ 1.11
, ....
1,445.16 $ 0.01 $ 1.12
1,456.96 $ 0.01 $ 1.13
1,468.74 $ 0.01 $ 1.14
1,480.52 $ 0.01 $ 1.15
1,492.30 $ 0.01 $ 1.16
1,504.08 $ 0.01 S 1.17
1,515.86 $ 0.01 $ 1.18
1,527,114 $ 0.01 $ 1.19
1,539.42 $ 0.01 $ 1.20
1,551.20 $ 0.01 $ 1.21
1,56;1.98 $ 0.01 $ 1.22
1,57.4.76 $ 0.01 $ 1.23
1,586.64 $ 0.01 $ 1.24
1,5g8.32 $ 0.01 $ 1.25
1,610.10 $ 0.01 S 1.26
1,621.88 $ 0.01 $ 1.27
1,633.66 $ 0.01 $ 1.28
1.1145.44 $ 0.01 $ 1.29
1,657.22 $ 0.01 S 1.30
1,666.99 $ 0.01 S 1.31
1.680.77 $ 0.01 $ 1.32
1.692.55 $ 0.01 S 1.33
1,704.33 $ 0.01 S 1.34
1,716.11 $ 0.01 0 1.35
,
1,727,89 $ 0.01 $ 1.36
1,739.67 $ 0.01 S 1.37.
1,751.45 $ 0.01 S 1.38
1,763.23 $ 0.01 S 1.39
1,775.01 S 0.01 S 1.40
1 786.79 S 0.01 $ 1.41
1,798.57 $ 0.01 S 1.42
Napies LF _Escaiation Rates-Rev10-09 (2).xis - Posi.Shell Pricing
---~.
-" ~ - "'-'-.' ..._..~_...-
Exhibit 5-A
Attachment A-4
Payment for Mulch
Grinding and Processing
and
Transportation of Excess Vegetative Matter
The County agrees to pay Waste Management Inc, of Florida (WMIF) the cost of grinding/mulching
vegetative waste and blending this material with soil in the proportions required by the Landfill
Operating Agreement, Section 2.15, "Construction and Demolition Debris; Biomass; and Tire
Chipping Processing". TIle County and WMIF agree that the cost for this service is $14.84 per
inbound ton, which includes a 15% margin. The County recognizes that the cost for performing the
grinding, mulching and blending services may increase or decrease annually due to changes in
contractual obligations between WMIF and their subcontractors. If the costs increase or decrease,
WMIF must notify the County in writing of such changes within twenty (20) business days prior to
commencement of the increase or decrease.
If WMIF and the County arc unable to agree upon the fee within ten (10) business days from the
notification, WMIF must obtain competitive, best value proposals from three (3) qualified vendors,
within twenty (20) business days and submit to the County. The County will have five (5) business
days from the submittal date to review and approve the proposed new rate. Upon the County's
approval of the pel' ton adjustment, the approved cost shall be utilized for reimbursement to WMIF
by the County.
In the event the County does not approve the new rate, or takes longer than five (5) business days to
approve, WMIF will use stocked soil and mulch mix. In the event that the stocked soil and mulch
mix is depleted, WMIF will use either Soil Only or Soil and Posi-Shell. Upon changing the daily
cover method the Soil Only or Soil and Posi-shell Per Ton (as applicable) Reimbursement Rate will
be utilized for payment to WMIF by the County for each month during which the mulch could not
be processed at an approved ratc. Upon reaching a negotiated, mutually agreed price for the
blending of mulch and soil, WMIF willre-commence the use of soil and mulch mix.
In the event that vegetative waste is not utilized for blending with soil as set fOlih above, the unused
vegetative waste will be diverted to all area within the Collier County Landfill or the Resource
Recovery Park designated by the County Manager or its designee, where it will remain and be
utilized by Collier County as needed. In the event that the County Manager or designee request that
the unuscd vegetative waste be transpOlied off-site, WMIF will develop a process for the removal of
the excess vegetative waste, which provides best value pricing for the reuse, recycle or disposal of
excess, unused vegetative waste and submit the process to the County for review. The County will
have five (5) business days from the submittal date to review and approve the proposed process.
Upon the County's approval of the pel' ton adjustment, the approved cost shall be utilized for
reimbursement to WMIF by the County.
In instances in which manmade or natural disasters affect the County and the amount of vegetative
waste is substantially increased, the County reserves the right to negotiate final disposition and rate
of the vegetative waste in compliance with FEMA regulations regarding debris removal and
management.
,.-.
Exhblt 6-A
Attachment B
Naples landfill
Monthly Odor Control Invoicing Process
New Methodology
Instructions
1. Accumulate and summanze soli purchases on "Purchases" tab of worksheet. Venfy cost
er cubIc vard of soil Is reasonable and accurate.
2. Copy daily cover summaJY Information for soli and posl-shell usage Into "Dally Cover
SummaI)''' tab on worksheet.
3. Review cost per cubic yard for soli and select correct Indexed cubic yard reimbursement
rata from "Soli IndexIng" lab of worksheet Include that rata on tha InvoTca cover sheet
4. Review cost per load of Posl-Shell and select correct indexed per load cost reimbursement
rate from "Posl,Shelllndexing" tab of worksheet Include that rate on the Invoice cover
sheet. Uodate the Posl-Shell cost worksheet If necessal)'.
5. Summarize buried tons from scale summaI)' report provided by Collier County. input
material amounts on "Detail Tonna e" tab.
6. Review "Odor Control InvoIce" tab to insure amounts are calculati!!lL correctlv.
7. Submit InvoIce to Collier Coun for review and~yment
.
,,~-
New Invoice Format-LOA Changes 1-21-10.xls -Instructions
- --~-,.,.__.~
.~.,~_____,_.'.o_".
-,.......----...-..-.
,,-
...-'.
Exhibit 5-A
Attachment B-1
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Naples Landfill
P.O. Box 990400
Naples. FL 34116
(239) 455-8062
(239) 455-0853 Fax
January 2010
INVOICE
Solid Waste Department
3301 Tamlami Trail East
Naples. Florida 34112
Attn: Beth Ryan
Invoice Date
Invoice Number
1/31/2010
OCR12010
Odor Control Reimbursements. January 2010
Total Buried Tons for Invoiced Month
~ I
16,294.645 I
Material Reimbursement
Soil Reimbursement
Mulch Reimbursement
Posl-Shell Reimbursement
Per Ton
Rates
I $ 7.2671/cuyd= $ 1.40 $
N/A $ $
I $ 974.00 IILoad = $ 0.72 $
$ 1.14 $
22,812.50
11.732.14
Airspace Reimbursement-Per Ton Rate
18,575.90
Total Due -
$
53,120.54
Questions? Please contact - Step Waste Management
11990 State Road 82
Please remit to: Ft Myers, Fl. 33913
Note 1:
Airspace Reimbursement - Per Ton Rate includes overhead reimbursement component from original LOA
amendment as well as incentive rate to insure WM does not utilize excessive airspace during their daily cover
operations. Daily cover assumptions are predicated on using a maximum of 28% of cubic yardS of sailor mulch
to cubic yards of waste that has been placed in the landfill. The assumptions are based on a 12 month calendar
year.
New Invoice Format-l.OA Changes. 1-7-10xls.xls - Odor Control Invoice
.-.
Naples Landfill
Exhibit 5.A
Attachment B.2
Jan.10
-
~umm.ry of Purchased Salls
Cover Loads Cu Yds er load Total Cu Yds Rate per load Total Amount
A&A . . $ .
MJS , . $ .
BARRY 518 14.0 7,252 $ 101.74 ~ 52,701.62
-
Total 518 7,252 $ 101.74 $ 52,701.62
Avera~e rate per cubIc yard for current month purchases: , ';""""-
. ., ... ,.,. '~'.'.. .., ~.
, . ''''-, ,f.','li .'.".
Conversion betiveei114 cubic yard loads purchased and 26;2 cublo yarc:f loads lIsed
Cover Loads Cu Yds per load Total Cu Yd.
14 cu yds purchased 228 14.0 3,196
26.2 cu yd. used 122 26.2 3,196
Initial Cover Loads Usad Par Tracking Log
Cover Loads ell Yds par load Total Cu Yds CubIc Yard Rate Total Amount
Purchased 122.0 26.2 3,196
No Charge 2.0 26.2 52
Total 124.0 3.249
Soli Used Current Month (a): 3,196. $ 7.287 j $ 23,228.83
3,1~ I.''-..~ ".,.'"' ,._.'.C. "'-"'.'."_0. $ 23,228.83
1,> ' .
...,
Rate per cubic yard for Indexing adjustment worksheet $ . 7.261\
,. ,.,","""." ".... .
Note (a): Soli used (rom curreril rnbnlh purchases at current month cubIc yard rate, It,s per section 2.25(6) of !he 5th Amandemenl.
New Invoice Formal.LOA Changas 1-2j-10.x1s' Reimb Dally Cover
,..._,
,."....- ,- --...- ,,-_.'-
- .-.~ ......--,.--...--.
.......-..-.-
Exhibit 6.A
AUacruhenl B-3
Naples LahdflU Total Purchases on purchasing log: S 52,701.62.
Dally Cov~i' July
Vendor_ A&A
Numb2f Tolal
Dales of loads Cubic Yds CubIc Raleper. Rala per lnvol~
lnvolc~ Dale InvoICe # Recetved received Tons per load Yards load CubIc Yard Amount
TOt21s
o
o
5
,
"
Vendor .. MJS
Numbsr Tolal
Dales of loads Cubic Yds Cubic: Ralep?r Raleper Invoice
Invoice Dale Invok.ei# Received r€:c~ed Tons per load Yards ~ad CubIc Yard Amount
Totals
o
o 5
Vendor.. BARRY
Number Tola]
Dales ofkiads CubIc Yds Cubfc Rate per Ratep2r Invoica
Involta Date Invoice: Received rece{lIed Tons per load Yards ~ad CubIc Yard Amount
813109 4315 813 42 934.24 14 58B 5100.10 S 7.15 S 4,204.0B
8/4109 4313 814 60 1,370.90 14 B40 S 102.82 S 7.34 S 6,169.05
6/5109 4316 8/5 25 553.55 14 350 5 99.64 S 7.12 S 2,490.98
8/5/09 4314 815 15 346.94 14 210 S 104.08 S 7.43 S 1,561.23
8/6/09 4323 816 14 320.59 14 19G S 103.05 S 7.36 S 1,442.66
8/7/09 4324 8f! 14 318.12 14 196 S 102.25 S 7.30 S 1,431.54
8110109 4325 8/10 13 2W.99 14 182 S 102.80 S 7.34 5 1,336.46
8/11109 4326 8/11 13 308.D7 14 182 5106.64 S 7.62 5 1,386.32
8112109 4327 8/12 1 1 260.60 14 154 5106.61 5 7.61 S 1,172.70
8/6109 4328 816 30 687.48 14 420 S 103.12 5 7.37 5 3,093.66
8/10109 4329 8110 1 22.10 14 14 S 99.45 5 7.10 S 99.45
8/11109 ~33Q 8111 17 365.14 14 238 S 98.65 S 0.90 S 1,643.13
8112109 4331 8112 19 415.91 14 2aG S 98.51 5 7.04 S 1.871.60
8113109 4339 8113 9 199.26 14 126 S 99.63 S 7.12 5 S9G.67
8117.')9 4340 8117 8 185.06 1. 112 S 104.10 5 7.4. S 632.77
8/18109 4341 8118 8 180.61 14 112 S 101.59 5 7.26 S 812.75
8119/09 4342 8/19 24 537.20 14 336 S 100.73 5 7.19 S 2,417.40
8/20109 4349 8/20 27 621.15 14 378 5103.53 S 7.39 S 2,795.18
8/21109 4350 8121 30 658.20 14 420 S 96.73 S 7.05 S 2,961.90
8124109 4351 6/24 24 545.39 14 338 S 102.26 5 7.30 5 2,454.26
8125109 ~352 8/25 33 757.09 14 462 S 103.24 S 7.37 S 3,408.91
8126109 4353 8/28 13 285.613 14 182 S 99.23 S 7.09 S 1,289.97
8128109 4354 8/28 28 029.sa 14 392 S 101.23 5 7.23 S 2,834.37
8131109 4355 8131 40 910.35 14 560 S 102.41 5 7.32 S 4,096.56
Tolals
516
7,252 S 101.74 5 7.27 5 52.701.62
New Invoice Format-lOA Changes 1.21.10.>:113- Purchases
,,_.
_.
~-.
~t
" a
U
~
H
"E
:;;
~~
Exhlblf 5.A
Attachment 13.4
-.. .-
.
~
i
.
+\=
~OOOOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQOOOOOOO=
~
~
Iii
i5
H
"
o
11
5
o
o
I
w
l<
lii
!
-
a
:
5
o
"
g
j~
"
"
o
11
I~
0.
o
'Il.
&;;'l:I 00
. . .
as........
0.
0/:1 "11/1 ~':llJ1
~y:QddCl
qq'I"I1I1l~
........doDO
o
~
-
~~Il1.q~1Il
........0000
t:! qU1~' III Ul
.......0000
~
. 6 g,
~~~~""oo~~oc_o~=~""~~o~~~~~""ON""~~N""o2
~........... .....- I.... .... ....................... N
"
-
OQ
~o
~"
;;i
""
N
N
.
-
~
~
E
~
g
I~
o
~'H
'"
r"MN<otMlIl
0C1I;l)t-lDll'I
~
-
-
"'-:MlI';>,<# '<'
"'-:M~<<"t
bi
l ~~
i
Q.
(')"l'NM;-~
lD\I'l~fC>~ltl
i:j
-
"'U'l(')ll'IlOC':l
~ 'Ot'<tllH?M
OOOOOOQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOO~
~@~~~~~~~~~@~~~~~~~~~~ij~~~~~~~~~~o~
,~o~~~~@~~~~~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~~Q~~
........... .................................................................................................r
d
.
----_.......-.-.,...
._-..._.__.~"'~...".
...._--.,_._._~,'.~...".,.- ,
~
~~
9il
~o
. .
II
""
u
~~
I
~
II
~
"
" .
E E
. n
~ ~
un u
-~-
;J.!j
u3u
~::Io
t:I....~
N .
M
t
~
..
€I
~
?i
S
,
I
!
~
i
~
!i
I
il
g
t
.gu
ll~
O~
il~
o
It m II G II
U~ n
~U u
~~~ ~g
~ I ~ ~.~
~n
Ii!
~
~~*
j
"
Si <D~
11~~U;
h
o.
.
o
.Fl
.0
"
._-~-,
J
~
!
.
~
"i'
-
'1
-
~
i
i
...
i
~
"
Exhibit 5-A
Attachment 8-5
Naples Landfill
Posi-Shell Cost
Worksheet to Update Cost
For Month of: January 2010
Materials
Quantity
Per
Load
Units
Unit
Cost
Cost
Per
Load
Water 1,600 [a] Gallons $
Cement - Portland 2 [b] Tons 113.90 227.80
Posi-Pak Fiber Strands 4 [b] Bags 39.05 156.20
PSM 200 Setting Agent 20 [b] Bags 20.75 415.00
Labor [c] Man Hours 20.70
Equ ipment/Fuel/Maintenance [c] Hours 80.00
Monthly Equipment Rental 1 [d] Per Load Cost I 175.00 I 17500
$ 974.00
[a] - No cost included for water
[b] - Unit cost to be updated upon purchase of additional Posi-Shell material
Unit costs should include all applicable freight and taxes. Supporting invoices must
be kept on file and included with monthly invoice to Collier County
[c] - This component was included in the pilot study but reduced to $0;
as these costs are included in the Airspace Reimbursement-Per Ton Rate
[d] - Base rate included for equipment cost is $175.00, this amount would be updated
once a new equipment agreement is signed. Updated monthly cost would be
included in recalculation of rental component. (Total annual rental cost/Assumed
161 loads Posi-ShelllYear)
Posi Shell Equipment Cost:
Annual Cost of Posl-Shell Equipment
Quantity of Annual Projected Posi-Shell Loads
Equipment Cost Per Posi-Shell Load
$ 28,175.00
161
$ 175.00
New Invoice Format-LOA Changes. 1-7-10xls.xls - Posi-Shell Costs - Worksheet
-
Exhibit 5-A
Attachment C
Waste Management Inc. of Florida
Performance Measures
From: Zelltt, Stephen [mallto:szelltt@wm.com]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 8:42 AM
To: BestLlnda
Ce: RodrlguezDan; Carter, Harold; Tindell, Bryan
Subject: RE: Scenarios
'-'.
Per your request, I have completed putting the allached schedule together to illustrate the cost benefits to
Collier County from reduced monthly odor control payments as well as saved airspace Impacts. The
worksheet contains two pages, the first Is the annuai impacts and the other Is the 30 year impact. The
following is a summary of the file:
There are two components to the schedule, the odor control reimbursement part and the airspace benefit
section. The odor control reimbursement savings is calculated by taking the cubic yards of soil that are
saved by use of Pas i-Shell and then reducing them further by replacing some soil usage with mulch. The
net impact Is we would be using 55% less soli In combination with Pas I-Shell and mulch. This reduced
soil lowers the odor control reimbursement amounts which on a 30 year basis are almost $B,OOO,OOO.
A larger portion of the benefit to Collier County relates to the freed up airspace that can now be used to
bury additional tons of garbage. The impact is calculated by taking the soli savings related to the use of
Posl,Shell and converting It Into tons. Savings of 716,580 cubic yards Is reduced by the .25 Inches of
airspace used by the Posl-Shell (44,726 cu/yds) which results In a net airspace savings of 671,854 cubic
yards. Those cubic yards are then converted to tons by multiplying by .65 which results In 436,705
additional tons of airspace available for disposal. At the current gate rate of $50.58 per ton the airspace
value would be In excess of $22,000,000.
The grand total benefit to Collier County Is over $30,000,000 over the 30 year period for the combination
of reduced odor control payments as well as additional airspace saved. Clearly, as the tipping fees
Increase over the next 30 years, the value increases. I have used a similar format to the handouts we
were using during our negotiating sessions. Please review and let me know If you have any questions.
Than ks.
Stephen Zelilt
Sel1lo/' Financial Analyst
South Florida MClrket A/'ea
6120 21st Street East
Bradenlon, FL 34203.5005
(941) 751-7564 - Direct Line
(941) 915.6688 - Cell
(941) 755-4854 - Fax
szelll!(1ilwm.com
--,.
C-t
,._,~-- -
-'.'"~- .
--..,...
--,..- --_....
u
-
-
-
o
;;
-
-
o
"
-
-
'"
'"
"
o
U
-
-
o
-
-
'"
,
.-
"
o
^
-
'0
-
-
-
..
-"
o
-
-
-
:E
-
-
<:
'0
c
"
...l
"
-
-
-
-
-
o
U
-
o
.-
-
-
o
>
o
o U
'" "
'0 ._
E <"l
" Q
-
o '0
.- 0
:;; ....
~ !::
~ c
0'':
.
C~
0-
- "
- -
- -
- ..
o -
o 0
"''''
.
-
o
U
o
"
"
"
::;
-
.
"
=
.-
>
"
'"
o
o
"
C-
.
-
.-
"
.c
" '"
.
:; -
0
" ~
- ~
.,
~
>
-
-
0
.
o.
~
.
'"
.~
>
"
~
"
.
-
.
. . ~
. '0 , ~ "
. ~ -" " S
" " ..
'0 . . . >
- > 0 > ~
> 0 " .
~ ~
.
" ., "
o. "
. . .
- '" ~
~
" ~ -
., 0 .
~ "
~
"
,
-
>
"
~
t.
-
.
, . "
. "
. "
- " ,
"
.. . >
'0 > ~
- "
> ~ .
:3
-
., t
o.
.
'" "
.
.. ~
" ..
- -
'0 0;
~
-"
- .
0 "
-
- ;.;
.- "
.
~
-
.
"
C-
O
o ~
o~
~.q,
~ ~
_ M
NM
O~
o ~
-0
~~
M
,-1,,,
O~
O~
-0
~'"
_ M
,..."..,
o~
O~
O.
~
_ M
N M
-
"
o~
O~
O.
~
_ ,0
"' M
-
.
~
O~
O~
o
~
_ M
e'M
-
~
~
o
-
o
~
-
~ C-
O
" ^
O~
0"
_ 0
- ,.
Q 0
g.g
rU
"'S
:6 0
~
~
.
-
:0 -
~
" "
c 3
"
... -6
,,~
"
o
>
o
U
N
~
.
M
o
~
"'
~
"
.
-
~
~
-
~ ~
.. ~
~ ~
.
-
~..
>::>r-->.e
.-~ "'.
N _
'"
"'
:<l
~
N
'^
M
~
~
M
o
~
e\
~
~
o
~ "
.:0
"
:0
~
~
"1
-
.-
"
~
o
.3
-
o
"
;;
-
~
..
~
~
" 0
;:).1::
"
" 0
~ ..
o _
3
"
~
,
."
o
'"
"$.~
~
N 0\.
~
~
"$.0
~ ~
N ~.
~
~
..
00
00
...., M.
~ ~
r-, ~
"
0' ~ <;:>
00 0
N '" ''',
c. ~
~ N
-
-
~
~
~
r.
c.
"
o
~
~
o.
o
~
N
"$.0
OO~
1"'-1 ~.
~
o
~
o
-
.
o
-
'5
-
~
,.
..
U
."
'"
"
.
..
..
E
";;:1
o
"
..
~
.. "
~ 0
.. ,.
o
,.
o
"
o
U -
"
-
"
o
"
(}
o
~
o
o
M.
~
N
~~
~M
~ .
.0
~
~
~
~
~
~
'"
~
.
"
o
o
o
o
-
~~
,_ M
~ .
.0
~
~
.
~~
t_ ,~.
~o
~
~
.
,0
0'
C
o
.
~o
.- M
~o
'"
~
.
If;, '~
~ M
~D
~
~
~
-
C
.
o
o
"
..
5
.
.
"
.
~
.
.
..
-
~
o
.
..
-
..
.
>
o
~
M
o
c
o
~
..
o
~
-
..
o
U
..
o
o
o 6
~ ~
.
~
..
..
o
~
-
..
~
5
~
"
..
"
'"
'0
'0
.
:i
o
o
o.
-
~
..~
o
o
-
.
~
~
.~~
..
o ~
~ -
"1 ~
~ ~
~ ~
<', ~
..
v,.... V;
- ~
~
~ ~
~ ~
o ~
M _
~~~
o
.
e'
~
.
o
o
OJ
N
-
.
.
o
o
.,
00
~
.
o
~
..
E
<.I iil
c =_
"~
~ a
~ 0
-'"
o
"11
~
u ..!.
o -
L~
-;::; ,.,
o 0
:-.
"
o
f-
-
~
~
'"
~
-
-
~
~
~.
~
~
.
O~
~~
'"
..
..
~
~
OM
o
-
.
~.
~
~
~
"
o
o
M
M
N
M
~
05
N
N
.
~ e'
~ -
"IN
::!
~
~
'"
r.
N
~~
00
"'0
.
..
~
~ ~
00
~<...
o
~
~
~
;OM
..
.
.
~
~
~
-
c
.
6
.
"
o
.c
e
.
0:
..
"
'0
"
-
o
:;;
s
o
f-
~o
00
~ .
.0
~
-
M
~
-
M
~~
~~
~O
..
-
M
~
"
o
.
~
N
~
o
~
o
"0
~,
~
~
o ~
~ ,-
"10
-
~
-
~
'"
o
o
N
~
N
"00
~.
~
~
O~
~"
"10
..
~
-
~
-
~~
~~
f';d
~
-
M
,;
~
o
,~
..
~
o
f".
2
"
o
U
.
o
U
..
c
o
o
e
"
..
C
.
e
.
.
o
~
E
u
0:
.
u
"
o
-
u
.,
~
....
'"
~
'"
<-
'"
:q
M
...~
<-~
"'~
'"
.,
'"
'"
"
o
o
..
N
- ~
o
o
~
-
~
~
M
~
....
....
~
.
...
~
N
M
-
<-
'"
"-
M
'"
.
o
~
N
o
..
.
..
~
~
00
~N
"'~
'"
-
'"
'"
...
~
'C
'"
~
'"
~
~
.,;'
'"
..
O.
f-
..
o
,
-
"
o
U
-
C
o
;;
o
.
-
o
-"
;;
.-
o
0:
-
o
-
o
...
c
.
8
-
.
..
..
U
o
-
~
'"
"
o
.
'"
-
-
e
.
5
~
o
.
e
e
.
'"
-
-
o
~
~
,.;
N
n
>
o
~
.
.
..
..
-
-
.
:.:;:
-~
.00
].3
c
::l =
~-
-~
-::l..).
, ll! 0
'E~~
-
o
'"
-
~
o
o
..~
o
'"
~
o
,
"
o
;..
o
"
.
U
~ ~..
~ M ~
,.... >C._
d"" -.&
~ - ~
o ~ M
~ ~ ~
-
"
"
"
..
E ~-
e: v"";:
'0 >-.'":: ..
~-':i
,:,0
c'o.o
o<nO"1
"
-
-.
O~
~"I
_ M
.. N
~
~ N
o
!!
~
-
."
.
<Ie)
;;;7-
'';; =
o .
=<
o c
o 0
~1l
~ >
.':: .,
.~
o"'S
~.~
~::J ....
" - .
~ 'E v.
""
,. "
;..
o
"
.
U
-
o
'"
o
.
" u
0_
.~
_ 0
<u
-
..
o
~~
.... ::I
" .
o "
0"
-
.
7:
-
~
.
:;;
"
..
0;
.
"
p
-
~
"
>
o
~
.
~
..,
~
f'!
~
~
.5
>
o
~
o
o
g,
"
"
"
"
g
o
>
o
'"
o
o
2
~
~
<
~~~+
o' ~ <::> I
~ ~
~ I
~ I
~I
I
L
o
..
..
"
.-
<:
1l
- >
o "
~ (1',
>- ~.5
~~
'-' o.eo
;;--1::
"-0 C
. 0
'-' W
o ~
00 "
.~ -< .Eo!
~..o
o B U
" 0
,,-
-
.
f-
o
-
o
~
8
~
o
>
"
~
,
"
g '"
.<':1 0 u
-.... <J
Oil " ~
.... 1:; 0..
;:; " a ~
;. ~ l:
00'"
uuu
~
M
;1
o
'"
-
~
"
-
;
.
u
"
.
-
-
.
u
.
-
-
'"
.
,g
]
o
f-
~
c
,
"
N
.
U
".
~
..,
~
f'!
~
-
o
-
.S
..
.-
~
~
<
.-
--
--
u
-
-
~
5
'"
~
~
-
-
""
-
-
c:
"
-
-
"
-'
;:.
=
=
o
U
"
u
-
-
o
U
o
~
;:
.
."
.
'"
J2
e
m
.
>
"
.;:i
..
o
U
-
-
~
-
'"
.
.-
..
o
^
-
"
-
-
-
..
-
-
u
-
-
-
.-.
_
-
.-
o
'"
"
u
-
~
5
.-
-
v.
"'
~
o
i:'
"
=
-
-
=
-
..
'"
"
o
'C
u
,
-
"
-
..
~
.,.
'"
"'
"
u
>
o
u
"
~
..
"
.
u
>
o
U
>,
.-
-
--
Q
"
u
-
-
..
-
-
-
..
-
..
'"
~
.
.-
>
r.n
u
u
"
Q.
,
"
.-
-<
.--'.-
~~
- 0
~O
.- .
. "'
- "
0
on
.,
0
0
.
"'
"
.
.
on
"'
,
-
.,
"
on
~
,
-
.
. - . ~
. J, , ~ E
0 '" E
. 0
'- " 0 . .
.. .
> 0 > ~
:> 0 " 0
.. "
-
~ .
- "
- "
n o.
"
u
0 "
'" -
v,
- .,
0 <
on ~
o.
0
>
.
'"
"
.
-
.
. .
. ~
~ ~ E
n
.~ " 0
. >
> ~
. "
:> .. 0
"
..
., .
"'
0 "
'- "
~ "
0
" "
-
- on
'"
.
"
n
"'
"
>
-
.
5
-
rJ;
-
u
"
-
-
-
o
-
00
8.;;;
'....N
~ -
~
~d
..
00
0-
0.'"
~or
~ ..
~ -
..6ci
00
o
0....'
~N
~
'n ..
00
o
o
'"
".
~
'"
~
00
o
o.~
,,.., d
~-
~..
..dd
..
00
o
o.~
"",..i
~..
~ ..
~o
~
.
"'
8-
"'
'B6
"' "'
O~
;. a
.- ;;-
" .
"'
~~
o ..
;-U
n n
'0 '5
!-of-
o
"'
N
..
o
N
~
..
.
~
o
o
..
00
~
..
..
.'
~
~
..
~~
..
,., ,,..~
~ ~
77
..
7~0
~.. ~
~ .,..~ "".
O~O
,- ..
.'
.'
N
~
C,
o
~
'"
~
:;:
c,
~
o
o
..
~
~
-
o 0
,,.., ""
~ ~
." ~
..
a*'?
M ~.-I
""'<'1<"1
.. '"
c.
.
U
"
~
"E ~.'
"-
"
1l
~ . "'
Ol::>-g
'0 ~ '" 0 ~
~-'":::l...J
;:J ~ 2
n~
.s"
..
:2
"
C
U
n
:2
c
~
u
.
>
o
U
"
~
<Q
"'
o
,
.-",.-
..
~ ~
~ ~
'-'.'0.
-
~~
~ ~
;t. l"l 00')
M ''1 0';\
~ ~
~
c..
-\ ~
..
-
-
-
c
..
c.
"
.'
00
N
o
o
00
~
..
00
or
~
.>
..
o
~
"'
"
..
~
>
,
'C
"
"'
~
u
n
>
U
;e
U. -
u
o
:2
..
..
..
.
n
:2
'0
~
"'
~
u
n
>
U
:0
o
U
--.
O~
OO~
NO
'"
~
"
N
~
O~
~~
"0
~
~
"l
N
~
"
.
o
o
o
O~
00",
"0
~
~
"l
c.
~
O~
go:>....-:
N
,"0
~
"l
N
~
*
o
o
~
O~
~ '-
""
~
~
"l
N
~
o
00
N
-;
~
"l
N
~
..
o
o
o
E
.,
-
o
.
E
.
o
o
~
E
;g
~
3
'i:
.
>
o
~
'-
o
..
o
u
,"
..
o.
o
U
---'^.~..
~ ~~
~~~
..
o 0
00 N
'1. -<r.
~ ..
N 0
~ ~
..
~ ~ ~
o
-.
~
'0
'"
c.
'"
lAYl'A
o
o
~
~
c
..
~
~
o
o
c.
c
c
"\
~
..
~
o
o
q
~
~
~
o
c'
~
.. "
.. 0
o 0
o 0
< "
o
~
E
'0
"
..
o
-
"
~
:0
u
'"
'0
~
"
~
,
=
"
"
:2
o
o
~.
..
~
"
N
..
o
o
o.
~
~
~
o
c.
..
o
..
g
o
~
.5
.
"
o
o
o
"
5
~
o
o
"
l!
Oi
.
l!
-
"
..
"
..
~,
..
o
N
6
,
..
..
o
c,
.
-
o
'0
..
..
~
o
N
-.
-
o
.-
-
~
5
O~
0",
'"
-
~
~
or
-
~
Q "
0_
~,...
~
~
~
='
N
~
if'
o
~
~
O~
~ 0
0,0
..
N
~
-;
~
ON
~..
~ ~I
..
~
Q
'"
..
~
..
.'
''-1
O.
o
00
~
='
~
-
~
o
N
..
.
N
'"
o
='
N
~
o ~
0-
"'~
~
~
'"
o
N
~
-
c
.
5
u
o
c
~
E
'0
"
"
'C
.
-
.
;;
.
-
Q
;-
~
o
o
~
o
~
-
o
;-
"
"
,
~
o
U
~
~
'"
o
~
'"
Q
Q
o
...
"
"
.
N
"
N
.
-
N
~
l'I
~
~
~~
0,0
~
Q
~
'"
~
"
.
~
~
'"
00
~
c.
M
~
"l
..
v,
Q '"
~~
~o
-
~
-
.
o.
v,
~
.
~
o
N
00 ..
,,",<"1
"! 0
"
~
"\
..
~
Q'"
~~
~o
-
~
..
.
o.
~
~Q
C. Q
~o
~
o
0,
~
v,
5
;-
"
u
~
~
U
-
c
C
Q
E
'"
-
c
.
5
.
o
o
~
E
'0
~
-
.
u
.
~
o
.,
~
'"
N
::i
...
'"
N
~
~
~
..
"
.
Q
'"
N
00 ~
- Q
N"
;;i
0,
~
~
"'~
~N
=-- '....
,
~
"'
...
-
N
~
,.
.'
N
~
'" '"
~ N
o
-
~
~
"'
~
'"
'"
'"
.
"
'"
"l
~
N
~
o
N
7
~ '"
C~
N 7
.
::1
~
.
'"
N
~
-
5
;-
,
.
,
-
"-
o
U
-
"
u
5
u
~
"
-
-
""
E
.,
u
'"
-
"
-
o
,..
,.'.O.~"_'-____"
l~
c
Q
U
"
~
8
Q
-
"
"
u
c
.
'"
C Q '"
0"'_
N.~ M
,...co..;
N ~ '"
"".""::?
Q-,
NN
v, v, ~
-
E
.
i5
-
c
t.
n
5
5
c
on
5
..
"
~
,
"'
.. "
"ti2':':;
,'" 0::..,.
"o~
3 e;: ..:
>- 0 0
"''''
o
"
-
"
..
in
,
'iij
U ,0
-
-
o
.
~
"
;;
..
k
..
~
,
";;;
o
~
'"
-
0,
0,
:i
o
M
N
v,
.
"
c
;;
"
>1
.=
>
"
'"
"
J
.
~
"
"
<
,
E
g
c
o
>
.
'"
'"
~
~
..l
!;;
='
~
~
t.-
o
o
o
U
"
.
..
"
U
Q
-
..
"
.
.
.
'"
..
.
-
c
;-
~
c
.
"
"
-
..
~
..
o
00
~
~
~
~~
c' ~
~"'
~-
~ c
-~
O~
''-.('1
v.l.o'
7
..
"'
:r. _
;! ;=l:::5
.. Vl"
.;::-:::1.' :>
!Ii _ co ;;; -
'" <; q 0 ::
'" ::;..... ~.::
<: '" <....--'"
e. ;;: U 0 =
1:; < -= I'.> :;>
._ -- Vl ~ ";:I
"'" ~..!. OJ
~ <J '" ;.-
...:. v. 0 ~ "
t::;:J ~ '[i: Vl
.. '" b -::l-
" -::l CI. OJ ::;
:n g u '" r.I)
- -< Ul:::)'"
::; ~ '" 0
on . _ >=' '"
... :: ~ - ':'
:> <> '" ..
Vl v>-"
.... '" ~ <.> ...
"2 " or.5 u
n ::>.. ... -
;.-",,<63
o
:5 ::
c 0
U ;;>:
n
-
'.
k
"
on
-
,g
~
~
<
~~'"
~ ~ v-,
0'...-,0+
O~
,- I
~
.. I
~ I
I
\
i
o
~
o
.0
-
o
"'
~
u
.'"
-~
. .
:a >-
o "
U .
-gg::
,. 0. 0
. e .
~ 0 <
. --
, 0 .
o "_
ti !:1 d.::;
..0: 0 u
~ f- g ::
6 -::l '" e:
";:: u 0 ~
'- t: ~ ~
~ ~ 5
- 1:: _
o 0 :l ::
UUUo
..
.-
-
Q
.,
-
o.
0,
'"
~
..
c.
~
'"
-
..
"
<
~
"
>
.
on
o
....
Q
~.b
.. c
_ 0
o Q
U
"
.
-
o
U
'"
,
()
_._-,.~"._.,...._.",~
June 7, 2007
Dan Rodriguez
Solid Waste Management Department
Public Utilities Division
Collier County Government
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Building H 3rd Floor
Naples, Florida 341 12
Dear Dan
Waste Management Inc. of Florida respectfully submits the attached "Interim
Performance Report - Demonstration and Pilot Testing of Posi-Shell and Crushed
Concrete as Alternate Daily Cover at the Collier County Landfill". This report provides
the performance of the pilot study of the use of Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) at the
Collier County - Naples Landfill Facility during the dry season. We hope this report
meets with you're approval and look forward to discussing it further with you. Pleasc feel
free to contact me at 770-364-1804 should you have any questions or require further
clarification.
/
J. Chewning, PE
",
Attachments: Interim Performance Report - Demonstration and Pilot Testing of Posi-
Shell and Cnlshed Concrete as Alternate Daily Cover llt the Collier
County Landfill
Cc: Chuck Dees, WMIF
Ron Kaplan, WMIF
Stephen Zelitt, WMIF
John Monaco, WMIF
Fernando Casey, WMIF
,~-,
WASTE MANAGEMENT
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
Demonstration and Pilot Testing of Posi.Shell and Crushed Concrete
as Alternate Daily Cover at the Collier County Landfill
--
June 7, 2007
-
- ------ .---....-
-"-,--_.~ P'-" <,
'_...~,"-,..-_....~
INTERIM PERFORMANCE REPORT
Demonstration and Pilot Testing of Posi-Shell and Crushed Concrete
as Alternate Daily Cover at the Collier County Landfill
June 7, 2007
This Interim Performance Report provides an overview of the pilot project that
has been conducted to date at the Collier County Landfill ("Landfill") to evaluate
the use of Posi-Shell and crushed concrete as Alternate Daily Cover ("ADC").
MISSION:
To operate and maintain the Landfill in an environmentally safe and sound
manner while providing the best value to Collier County ("County"). Among other
things, Waste Management Inc. of Florida ("WMIF) and the County intend to
comply with all applicable rules and regulations, eliminate off-site odors, achieve
operational excellence, preserve airspace capacity, and protect the environment,
including but not limited to ground water, surface water, and air quality.
GOALS:
. Evaluate the use of Posi-Shell and crushed concrete as ADC at the Landfill.
. Compare the use of Posi-Shell and crushed concrete to the County's current
practice of using soil as cover material.
. Determine whether (and the extent to which) the use of Posi-Shell and
crushed concrete as ADC consumes less airspace at the Landfill than the use
of soil as cover material.
. Determine whether (and the extent to which) the use of Posi-Shell and
crushed concrete as ADC costs less than the use of soil as cover material.
. Determine whether the use of Posi-Shell and crushed concrete as ADC is a
satisfactory (or improved) method of controlling odors at the Landfill.
BACKGROUND:
The cost of using soil as cover material at the Landfill has increased significantly
since June 2004. The availability of soil from local suppliers is limited. There is a
need to identify a viable substitute for soil as cover material because soil is a
non-renewable resource that may not be available in the future.
",-.
On September 13, 2006, WMIF petitioned the Board of County Commissioners
("Board") for reimbursement of unusual and unanticipated increases in the cost of
the soil used at the Landfill between May 2004 and July 2006. In response to
WMIF's petition, the Board authorized the Solid Waste Management Department
and WMIF to undertake a pilot project at the Landfill and thus determine whether
Posi-Shell could be used successfully as an alternative daily cover ("ADC").
On March 15, 2006 WMIF submitted a letter to the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection ("DEP") and thereby requested DEP's authorization to
perform a pilot project using Posi-Shell as an ADC at the Landfill. In a letter
dated March 21, 2006, DEP stated that it has no objections to the pilot project.
DEP also indicated that it would inspect the Landfill during the pilot project to
determine whether the project is being conducted in compliance with the
. applicable DEP rules and regulations.
APPROACH:
Posi-Shell has been selected by WMIF and the County for a pilot test that will be
conducted from March 15, 2006 through June 30, 2006, unless the County gives
its prior written approval to change these dates. A letter (dated March 21, 2006)
authorizing the pilot test has been received from the FDEP.
_ Crushed concrete also has been selected for use during the pilot test. A report
prepared by Dr. Tim Townsend, a professor at the University of Florida,
concludes that crushed concrete is effective at controlling and minimizing odors
from landfills. Crushed concrete was not used during the 60-day dry season pilot
test for two reasons:
1. From about mid March to about mid April, it simply was not
available
2. With Collier County's determination that crushed concrete is not
considered "soil" under the contract, its use is economically
infeasible for WMIF
Collier County and WMIF staff both observed and recorded the daily use of Posi-
Shell during the Pilot Project. WMIF recorded daily data using the "scorecard"
developed and approved by the Collier County Project Development Team
(PDT). The "scorecard" reflected visual observation and analytical data, as
applicable, related to odor control, vector control, litter control, erosion control,
fire control, and appearance of operations, and other factors that will enable the
PDT to evaluate the impacts and benefits of Posi-Shell compared to the
traditional use of soil for initial cover. In addition, the 'scorecard" reflected
FDEP's Guidelines for Obtaining Approval to use Alternate Initial Cover
Materials.
.-
-,- -- .-.-.-.---.-.-
~, ~-_.
___0.....___.. ".. __,,~,-,._. _
~--,_...
WMIF evaluated the Pilot Project using the "scorecard" as well as other technical
and contractual considerations. Data presented in this report include the
following.
.
. Environmental and regulatory compliance based on site observations
. Operational "scorecard" logs and summary
. Airspace consumption including historical baseline data and volume
analysis
. Monthly Cover Detail Logs documenting site soil consumption
. ADC Cost Tracking Logs
. Initial Cover Cost Tracking
. Photo Documentation
. Odor Control Protocol Logs
SCHEDULE:
The following schedule will be used to track activities and achieve the objectives
stated above.
--.-..- '-.'"'--'
Activity Schedule Status Completion
Date
FDEP approval Pilot 3/15/06 Approved 3/21 /06
Proiect
_..
Obtain BOCC approval 9/12/06 Approved 9/13/06
for demonstration and
.-21lot -
Prepare Final Pilot 10/26/06 Complete 12/19/06
Proiect PMP --
- -
Prepare Draft 10/25/06 Complete 10/26/06
Scorecard
_._~-_._,.,-- ----.-----.--
Ql2date PMP 11/10/06 Complete 11/11/06
Final Scorecard 11/13/06 r--Complete 11/13/06
---~-----_.~- --
.l,Jpdate. PMP 12/19/06 Complete 12/19/06
Demonstration to invite Demonstration Complete 1/9/07
BOCC, LOCC will be scheduled
members, FDEP at the most
representatives, and convenient date &
local representatives time for
attendees.
Ensure WMI contract 1/24/07 Complete with 1/31/07
has provisions for the negative result.
reimbursement of WMIF will not
crushed concrete and be reimbursed
legal review I for crushed
I I concrete.
~
,--.,
Pollution Control 1/25/07 Complete 1/30/07
Review of MSDS
Conduct topographic TBA Complete 3/18/07
survey to establish
landfill airspace
baseline
Deliver ADC equipment TBA Complete 3/20/2007
and supplies
Safety training of Posi TBA Complete 3/20&21/2007
Shell e uipment
Establish ADC use TBA Complete Continuous since
~otocol/ olic 3/20/2007
-.---.
Continue with Daily Daily Complete Continuous since
Odor Monitoring 3/20/2007
including County's H2S
monitorin data
Evaluate if ADC re, Daily Complete Continuous since
application is needed 3/20/2007
Track cost of ADC on a Monthly Complete Continuous since
monthl basis 3/20/2007
Conduct ground survey TBA Complete 5/9/2007
and calculate airspace
consumption during the
~Iot eriod TBA
Evaluate the ADC use
long term with a
cost/benefit analvsis.
PILOT STUDY RESULTS:
The equipment used for the application of the posi-shell ADC includes a mixing
silo and an applicator unit. A bulldozer as shown in Photo 1 pulled the applicator
unit. On most days a water truck was used to supply water to the applicator unit.
The mixing silo and materials are shown in Photo 2.
The following materials mixed in a 2,000 - gallon application unit constitute a
load.
. 1600 gallons water
. 4, bags (15- pound bags) Posi Pak Type P-100 Fiber Strands
. 20- bags (50- pound bags) PSM-200 Setting Agent
. 4,000 pounds (2- tons) Portiand Cement
._-,
Once the last dust control run of the day was completed, the water truck was
filled with water to supply the Posi-Shell application unit. Between 4:30 and 5:00
pm, water was transferred to the application unit and the bags of Posi Pak and
- -----"'"
~'-".., -"",;.""'.-.'-.'-"-
- -.- '_.-'._'---~..-
-.
--,.
PSM-200 were added. After a minimum of 5 minutes of mixing, the Portland
Cement was added and mixed.
.
The typical daily procedure was to stage about 10 loads of soil cover near the
working face, finish compacting the waste, and smooth the waste surface by
walking it in with a dozer. Then the soil cover was spread on the top surface and
the applicator was pulled to the working face.
Posi-Shell works best when applied from multiple directions. At a minimum an
application was conducted from both above and below the working face as
shown in Photos 4 & 5. Care was taken to spray the Posi-Shell not only up and
down the working face, but also across it from side to side. Generally, the
application from the bottom was the heavy base application and the application
from the top was lighter to fill in the shadows. The area was sprayed with the
material to a coating depth of approximately one quarter (1/4) inch. A series of
nozzles were used to spay the material close to the applicator or up to 150 feet
away. Wind had some impact on the spray, but typically the applicator was
capable of spraying 150 feet even against a significant wind.
The material seemed to cover the flagging very well with little effort from the
operator. The material dried according to its thickness. Significant drying occurs
during the first two hours, but sometimes thick applications were a little wet the
next morning. Photos 6 through 12 show the material in various stages of
application.
Actual spraying time for a 2,000 gallon load is a little over a half hour, but the
total time to mix a load. spay it from various locations, and clean the machine
was typically about one hour and 45 minutes for two people. One person can
perform the entire process, but two people let both finish sooner.
Data was captured daily on the ADC "Scorecard". Copies of the daily scorecards
and summary are provided in Appendix 2 of this report. Ratings on the
scorecard are from "-2" (poor) to "+2" (excellent) with "0" equal to soil cover.
Written summaries and average score for the individual performance parameters
are as follows:
. Odor Control: With a single exception, odor from the waste during the
dry season pilot test was not detected in WMIF's odor monitoring
program. The County's perimeter H2S sensors as not calibrated so they
did extensive testing with portable H2S sensors including around the
working face and did not register significant levels. WMIF's odor
monitoring program identified a working face type odor early in the
morning of May 4, 2007 near the south side of the landfill. A review of the
data from May 2 and May 3 indicate good Posi-Shell coverage and no
issues with its performance on following days. Also, operating staff has
not noted odors near the working face. At this point, the working face
.-
odor is an unexplained anomaly that has not recurred. (Average Score
+1.11 )
. Vector Control: Birds don't like wet Posi-Shell. They will sit all around it
- particularly on the soil top cover. After about 15 - 20 days, the buzzards
seem to have gotten hungry and started attacking the Posi-Shell much
like they had attacked soil cover. We noted damage on 4/6 and 4/7. It
seemed to get worse by about 4/10 when I sent these pictures and the
copy of the email to follow. We started using bird bangers on 4/11 and
they seemed to work well. Over the last month, the buzzard population
has dramatically decreased. There still exist a couple eagles and there
are swarms of sea gulls, but we no longer see significant bird damage.
Buzzards appear to be the culprit, and they are no longer prevalent.
Photos 13 & 14 are from the area that was covered well with Posi-Shell
the previous night. It appears that when the Buzzards become extremely
hungry they tend to break through the Posi-Shell but typically are only
able to un cove plastic and smooth paper. You can even see where they
have gone through the plastic to pull something out. This damage
happens primarily during the day, so this damage can be minimized by
systematically scaring the birds away. No other vectors have been noted
during the dry season. (Average Score +1.30)
-,.~..
. Litter Control: The only significant difference in litter control between
Posi-Shell and soil is that it is very easy to tack down pieces of litter
around the working face with Posi-Shell. This helps prevent the litter from
blowing away from the working face area. There has not been any
problem with litter becoming detached from a Posi-Shell covered working
face. The only thing noted is that sometimes a piece of blowing litter will
tend to get stuck in the Posi,Shell that had been covered several days
earlier. This could be considered an advantage in that the Posi-Shell
covered area will likely be covered with additional waste in a relatively
short period of time and the litter is kept from blowing outside of the
disposal area. (Average Score +1.25)
. Erosion Control: Very little rainfall occurred during the dry season pilot
study, but when it did, the Posi-Shell seemed to hold up well. Only when
a rainfall occurred shortly after application did significant damage to the
ADC occur. We found that touch up of a slightly damaged area was very
easy to accomplish as needed and that once a Posi-Shell covered
surface had been in place for a few days and had been touched up, it
seemed to hold up very well. A more thorough analysis of this will be
performed in the next stage. (Average Score +0.23)
,-".
. Appearance of Operations: Generally, Posi-Shelllooks as good or
better than soil cover. While a very well applied soil cover may initially
look better than Posi-Shell, Posi-Shell is a close second when the waste
_'___'..__m.._
.. "~.."~ --~_."
"'.'_.--.'- ..._~,--,~,
is well walked in before application. The difference is that Posi-Shell is
not attacked as badly by birds and that it is very easy to touch up so that
after a period of time, a Posi-Shell covered waste surface tends to look
better than a soil surface. A soil surface protected with Posi-Shell has a
very good appearance for long periods of time. (Average Score +1.39)
. Fire Control: No problems were encountered. To be evaluated further by
FDEP. (Average Score 0.18)
. Weather Conditions: During the dry season pilot, we have experienced
wind and a few rainfall events. Wind has not posed a problem at all. We
have been impressed with how well we can spray into a strong wind.
Photos 15 & 16 show minimal damage after a rain event. Rainfall did not
prevent our application of Posi-Shell during this reporting period, but soil
should be stockpiled as a contingency in the event of hard rain. The wet
season pilot study will yield more useful results. (Average Rainfall
0.04"/day)
. Staffing Requirements: One person can handle mixing and applying
Posi-Shell, but two allow the job to be accomplished sooner. Once the
operators became experienced with the technique, the total time for
mixing, application and cleaning has typically been 1 Y. to 1 % hours for
two people. There is likely some additional time related to filling the water
truck that was not reflected in the captured data.
. Working Face: We have covered from about 6,000 sq. ft. to over 15,000
sq. ft. per load. For a working face that has been well walked in, we have
achieved good results up to about 12,000 sq. ft. or sometimes a little
more. Above 13,500 sq. ft., results will not be acceptable. During the dry
season pilot, the area to be covered has been unusually large while we
were receiving large daily quantities of asbestos. It was also quite large
during a few of the trials of a two-day lift. For the dry season pilot, the lift
height has typically been about 14' to 18'. This minimizes the total area to
be covered but makes the sloping part of the working face to be covered
with Posi-Shelllarger. One load of Posi,Shell should be more than
adequate for daily working faces of this height.
. Airspace Consumption: Airspace Utilization Factor (AUF) was
measured during the pilot test period of March 18 through May 9, 2007.
This measured AUF was then compared to historical data measured over
several other periods. Because settlement can greatly affect AUF, the test
period AUF was compared to the Q2 2006 AUF data. The reason for this
was due to the fact that these lifts were very similar in that they were both
from an initial fill lift (fluff lift) of a new cell. Initially it was thought that the
use of posi-shell would yield a 21 % increase in AUF. The actual increase
in AUF between these two periods was measured to be 38.7%. It should
-
be noted that variations in waste streams and initial compaction can affect
performance but the improvement is clearly documented not only by this
initial result but also by the reduced use of soil cover. A summary of the
AUF measurements is provided in Appendix 3.
. Contingency Plan: A stockpile of soil is necessary in case of untimely
rainfall or equipment failure. Equipment failure caused WMI F to execute
this plan during the dry season pilot. It is anticipated that this contingency
will be required and utilized during the rainy season when rainfall in the
afternoon becomes frequent.
. Post Application Conditions: By the nature of the surfaces we are
covering with Posi-Shell, they tend to be covered again with additional
waste within a few days. Generally, if the waste is well walked in to a
relatively smooth surface and if the area covered is less than about
12,000 sq. ft., Posi-Shelllooks quite good and stands up well over long
periods of time. Rainfall within 2 hours or so can damage a Pas i-Shell
covered surface significantly. Rainfall after that initial period will cause
much less damage. Surfaces covered with Posi,Shell and then later
touched up seem to stand up very well for long periods of time
COST ANALYSIS:
.-."
Detailed cost tracking was performed during the pilot test period. Actual cost for
the application of initial cover was tracked starting in January 1, 2007. Soil use
was tracked and recorded on Soil use logs provided in Appendix 4 of this report.
Pas i-shell use was initiated on March 20, 2007. At that time all cost including soil
usage was captured and compared to the previous period when only soil was
used. This comparison indicates that the use of posi shell during the dry months
has the potential to reduce initial cover cost by as much as 50%. A detailed
analysis and summary is provided in Appendix 5.
It should also be noted that a further cost saving could be realized with the use of
crushed concrete. Typically, crushed concrete can be purchased or
manufactured for 10% to 50% less than the purchase of soil.
CONCLUSION:
Posi-shell has performed very well as compared to soil as initial cover. In nearly
every performance category, posi-shell exceeded the performance of soil while
providing a cost savings. Additionally, a clear increase in AUF was also
measured.
-
-.._.,,-- .
_.,~"_ " _,_.,w_._'"
-- --<---_.....-
. --.-----
This pilot test was limited to the dry season. In order to provide a better
understanding of its long-term performance, it is recommended that the pilot
program be extended and closely monitored during the wet season.
Additionally, it is recommended that crushed concrete be included and
encouraged in the pilot program. This is particularly critical during the wet season
to properly analyze the benefits of this material. It is anticipated that this material
will perform better than soil in increment weather. It is further recommended that
WMIF be reimbursed for the use of crushed concrete since this material is being
directly substituted for soil, has the same material characteristics as soil and cost
less.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Appendix 5
Appendix 6
Photographs
Performance Summary & Daily Scorecards
AUF Comparison & Measurements
Soil Use Logs
ADC Cost Comparison
Odor Control Tracking Logs
-
Appendix 1
Photographs
-~
.~
--_.._- ,~---._'
Demonstration and Pilot Testin2 of Posi-ShelI as Alternate Daily Cover
-." _ ':c,~:'::\.:\.;._.;,;';,"~,;,;"~:,'.;:.-'i:;.,,, "~';',i.";
, ..": .."'-'.1",:::~,-jl~:,-,.'~:;O~'.:.;'.i;>::':';"'.;".'-_. .:.-'_~i;.I'
. ...' .'; , '. ," .~"-'...' ,.,'.,.. -" "'..'.;d"
;.,..,~;.l.,..,."", .~,y."_~,,,,,. ..,.,..,,,.,
., ;.._"..,';,"0'.',.:..'''' '%t'<;l"-';;,I\:\"loiJ::'+1'" ..;'-",'?-""
--.... ,.:'.'-. .-.'e"" v'..~~v~-'.,''i\"'.,..._'.,.." .'''J"'',',-'
.. '0."_-.. ..' .-,..l..', .,,"'.'.' . .,~.,.. ,.,.. ". . "
<'_.( ,;.:._".y-,:'J,' 'id":"'I.j;',,;J~\. ".'~",.i./~!f.r.i!~~'-'.
"-,.'.- '.'V--'."',b;""l"..,-.~.,.~,g;!',;:." .j.',,, "-,~.'''''."
, '"'' ",'~wi~"dr~'~"1
.- .'."'.-,...'ct".-,.',""",.,_,_,"" ."H.~'~'._'-..."'"
.'. ..... :".'.::;~."i':.: ,.-,. -,"; ,.."...",.. U"""'
" ."'~'i~'i,'.'t,';i'~!f ;~l~.;i~'M ~~" .~~i~'j,l
,'.- .~"I' ....
-..,. .... -} '~I "",,"-, ";0,",,"'-'':11;' , , ~W';'"
.:;S..,.',+ .~:.". .',. .i. """"'... "..~"
"', .,.:,x~.,~f,..!.l'!,..,....1ft;,'....L,..,...,.,-< :81,_,,~;:,.
.. ....". ,.j..,.-,;)'". ,.-.,.,~y".,..".,"" '".'.~./);~:I
"'. .f$Ji:~'I"~. {d,;:'. ;.t~., '1''i'I.''~r~,r".,~;:'",
"'." .'''''''''''i.'iI;\.'.''''l'li'..'.'''.''.:'.''
"'" 0\ "'.'/E' ',-: ';"'wi...'~,cj:,~.,..
1''',.. 'ioL,iiI.,,~.-:>"J',j .i'.""":'.~~. ".>i'-;'.-.;.'\
j,"" .:'"",:l11fi!,",;o.j;)/?:.,::"
~ ",".""""'.,"."". C.._w.., ..,
_c '..".;""'.'"''''9''')'':1#"'.''';.:'':'-'..'''
-_~ /:r;;?J:."':i,J;,,,}, ,:q:?'&j"'..1
,!!,..",...".,.....".",",..,..-.,.,.....
'i ,~"iAh,i'::'.';J,?::\Ti;-:,;)\':
-,.,
Photo 1 - Posi-shell Applicator Unit
Photo 2 - Mixing Silo
-
.'~'-
.-
,----,.-
,,:..:'.:..:'7-".j,'::,'i,i
:"';"~.)k"'.":1
">\':;"!;l~~
.",--"",*,,-,
"~M.,;'0J
.. ..'.'''A.
'<'-
,.,,,
....,
-,..\,
','X
Photo 3 - Loading Applicator from Silo
Photo 4 - Application of Posi-Shell
,-"._",_,_"~"->"
,..~_. ,-,~"-~,.,. ._,-
.-'-
,-.-
,
e
,'j
,
,
Photo 5 - Application of Posi-Shell
,-
.-
.-.-.
_...
,
.,.., .",,,e
l';' ,,~'i~L,:fiIi
Photo 6 - Condition of Waste Surface During Application
,....<,.,,~_..., .....,'-~~--'
'-0.'_'
.-
Photo 7 - Application in Progress
"--"
;:-~i!:'c,':n;t:\1;:~!,\'<r;,
".'........,.."0..'.,."_,,.._
,._" .,~..d"~..."~'1~"~1
\
Photo 8 - Application of Posi-Shell
(previous day's application shown in fOl'eground)
-
_.
--
^---
.
-,,<-- . ,< ..~
,'... . . .--~".
.' ': .. : ..,C,'_ .--"
"
Photo 9 - Posi-Shell Right After Application
, ., .." J.'." .:f-? ".._'F ....'-,.
,...,.... ..-. .";";' '~';'''.,~ ........ .:";. -.:,-/~..,?:>-;'
~ ,,/. " ~L -, '. "',""-~"-.i".' . ." , -,.,. -,..... . .
, . ....r".. . .......;7.~'..:..J-. '-"'""" ,. '_~"'~. _'. ~ '.
~ . . " dO , Ir .. - ' ,I. 0" ( ", "~'. ..> "... :-,.-1 "'i. ,-' , , ';'-
". t_., c, " 7.') "...,....,,:.. ~t..".,. , ,f.,,~.:_"'.:'-,i~:1~1"...... '1..',.-" 'J . f-'.ctr',"O ';""'T_ ".,'".' , ~~ ~'. :~ ',. ,
'\ ~ .._ ,,""', .'Y .",.", "'J' ~ ~..~ r' "',,' < ,'."-
.,~ ,"",' .... .~., I" '.~., . ,.c... .~
P 'H;I;~:'~J' -, 1-...." '; -.,' H ~ . '. -" . ^"" ."'''-- ., """
_~II, ,..."',,,.'!V.....,/.,.. '.,~~,J '." ,.".~~., ~.:._ _ '_. -."'"t," ,_ ,.d 1 -."
.~ ''''~. '-l""'~ ...."'. 1'."'''' ., ."~.,, -..-' " . ....
... '~~;l.? C;~~4": '" :;'{\,..ti~~""",-,..,f'..~~.;t '"," .""c_, ~..._ '- _,;d"i.""':.~.' ., "-"'~.',
fI:i'-":6-~ :DI!j ~, - "" ,~.if...~,...~ ,.,"-~A. f .... ~1.~r14.'l")' .~...., ,"''''''/J. ,~'. ....
,1f"',,~~ ~~..~ ... 4 ...""I~^,:tl.,.~ ~..~'Y':'~",:#;!' '~':"'::l't,.~:~~,:v...',.."..,,, "~1'<~~..t'j'-t.,. .,',<.'" .~~~,.~.~- Wi! .
'~"""!':.r;._tr" ,"'i<~' ,....';., ~...,: "'~ ""'''''''- )".... j 1l.,.... ~,tt:::{,... f,~t""''J'<-,~ 1-,(<..... :
.', ~~ - , ~ .. 1,Oj, ,~.., w-f. -. ~"'" ...... '",' ..... ". , i"'" if".... , . ........
.' "'....:..,,' ,.~~.. .~,jl;" ~ ';;",.,,,,, ;',~f '" ,.:" .. '--~'"-'-f "r ~;(,,-<;";. '.j .~ ",'" ~7"d''':1 l - ;'{. .vi' ~ '1 t,
""" ~ 't'" "'" "-<.~< ',". ~-- 'Zi' '.. ~ ' ilAJ/r . ..
., -'" . ' (~.~ """') ,~~m ,;",'. ~~.:,.... ,;,#;:n ~',t <'r ...-'-"'. ' '.; "":1'"'. <'f' Y-
~":r-:!I1~,r" 'J)&J!!, JI.~~'s .~~I~~r,:..~~.~~,;;r...;\;,.J.,... '."llftillf!7.~.',; .\!'/~i"'-~I- ,I ,J ,~
'""r,~,.',., jI1..",....,., ~';;o.,.~'--'.I.',il~-,..;)I'9\tlI~'~. " ... '-,1 'Ji.-~ r..~~, ~".;; ~ 'c'~"
:"--'1~ ~:\;'t~;,,~;."" ;t'o"~...;..#..:;.r,..~;'."t~-W-,)...'.'1'~;....;::'.~~ ,ll''%. r~~"7""''f.''\P,,;, ','
"f'~t .r,;~Z;;~-\<\. V. \ ii:.~;..:/.~"" _. 'I' ',,\.>", ""',~i~" ,do;;;./.I,~. ~~\t>"'\ ..,; " 'f!/\ ....,lj, , t.- \-<'~ .... I'}. '" )P~
~~ lI;lil!:' :.;',~,,' :~:~:.. .'f:1r~-.:';;J.?~ '''';,('.' ;,\>1'''''- j,.lJ.":"..,.~...~~'t "./'"
~~:.-...' ,.;; ~JI~'.I;f_, ~;f h.~",;...~ IIMP::t'tl'?:i'--:-fJ..:< ~: .'/II,r, tf.;i .~.ti':&~'~ >~~ ~'.;;, ",
::or'~, >,'"" l!J~~ '<','" ,r.1f':~.,"''-~ . '~-"".,.. ;;.!, ",f ~ \'.. ~,....:,>,,:,-
..,.;t.....' ,-'. .........,'~ ':..~ '. '''''. !.... ..'. I , '''., , ,.,:,""- -, - ".~~
,. .;,C"~; . ". ,,,,. ,., J . . ,. ~ ' i" ,. " ,". ,'". . ... .,. . -,.
':ii ' .,,,..... ., /;"... .,. ~ ~1'" ,-,""I - ..,...
',"-" \J!' ",.:'>,' ~,\.. ;,.;11+1.>, of"'.., ~;.' ...17"'..,-, ..'. -
",.., ", ..c ~ if. ,-",,0., . '... .:;;,-..'-....-hr~...,,-l-.. ~ '...;I~i_'.".. 'j'i!' .~"r :1 I (Ii"
,. ." ..,..,..~'''.l ",oIJ.l,~. )' ;r:"'.,/ -, '" ,-1(,0.. I_~ -'#"1"","",;1"':.'. ,,-, -
, '""\ii' :,; ,',;:.".u:,' ".. ..,: ""~,:;v,\-.;,,, ,-"'" ....-.~ ",,'" ......,:\.r::-'!.\' t;" ,;>>-.J' ". ,,' i. ..
'liQ' >-:_;j... "~~it.~'l'~l' .,:..o~~'. .'t ""1*":(.. '0. . "~ .", '""'"
~"_r.{:~il'U~!it' ,~ciilL:;...~",-o" T4t".,1l:J., ~-' ~<~,~I,t' "> ",.., t: ....,. ,'<., ';"!'#~~~~" l~ ~.;:.,
.... c ;:it"'f7r.t}W ".~' .""".,., ~.,_ ""ij'~";\~' ~(' 't~'" .' " ~, ~ .. .'" l r '
,_; iJ ..~ 'f; (' , I'~' '~"'1~:'" ",:"'." .-,,~, ,~.: :a.~' .~~\!:!'i" i;"'~ .~. ,...."'1';2) ~.,:~,," 0.~~
"~.. '~~ ,,,,,-"', " ._ '" ..... ~J, '!';" ~'" ....' ,<.." -""".~.<,,~ .~../:""' . .
4".;:_, ~ "''l".-.,~~. c'.' ,_" ~~,~"' v',I<\", ~. Ie".. ~ " ~". '"" ~1
.. ~~; ,!r 1 1:"';,"'''''~' ..i:<",I,: ,!~,I!I 'l-4;t"~rl""i F;;!J' !.c"'""'''"",>~:'. '":" .Y.;: ',,':'3___ r..y,;).,,~i':l. ." 1;
", ;;. "'_ J#'''~'' ",.,'4/" .. - eo"'" . ""... '....' ,,,- ..- c' .~Ii- .....,
.1 ,. t" .~~i''''''' "'-' """.~, """ .;fIt'-~,.~,-- ,"" ,." '-"../, /fj" "."
,~ '.. '14 ~i;;,_ ,.... w;.. '''\ ....,r.::UY.,'.H" '''/.'"' '-",. h."
1 ". 'Il",..~;.!:-~.~,!~' ..~'~.;Vo)'I ,.-;;,....~.,'.J;;. .~.:' r "Y';;-.""" .-\ !:J. 'let c .- ", 1.. . J
".~,,,,,,,,, ,f "~~" ,,"l;~j, ,",.~..,...::t':.t" "_':':"1' ',' lj'~ .::........ '.............I;..r.:.,
"""~""1' "\. 1.1"'14\"" ,~~W "~}''-(,''''---' ,_\.(..,.''':'-,' ,,' > I!
""i?,y1O;1;(i ~t . I' ,,,...... '~~,,~,.r,i!l " ...'" .'~" .;"...t;;;;::.'.'Ii:'i~.'A"~',~
'",:vn:r;~:' ..," "'~"', ;r&l;,';. l~, ~.. J t' ..~~,,.,~~..;1i.'.....,,-
,.,;...~, l~~,,,l';' l'eJ' ~,,~~-;\, 'r"'~-.')1<>: '~,i-_">, ,< _r'a\:~; ;.,..~~:'~."
''''-/,::-\If,; "~I"~' <'t""'t,'/~',' '-' __ t~.r: f. /.", ........,..' :".', ~:
";:, \., '''':'~~-~1~i~.:itv'''~~~':':''J''~ ..\''''~j;>'''I~''/\.':'.~''t': ''i:,' ,)I~,t.c' '>.'il~~
Iiit'" '~io...:...... ,.' ~~'i': '<i;.;~"ID~"""l.i.'/;'~.' 1'1" '--rl":.1""':'~/~"..!J ~:"~~l~'-~' "'k,,'-~"')l
, 'O'''''''~' ~.l.<~""' ,.t-iJ.;"''''''o,,, ,on ,,,,"')'.l""'" ,~...-;,. . ,"
'1' "''''';~f'"'"'' ,\;" ."'. ~. . < '
.c;'l'..'. 'r___ 'A,'~'. _./~' "'-';J:t. ~.I' ,~~.4',' .......r""'~ . ...~ T,
I~~~i_<~;f\;~~'~' ,it '''.~ 'I~t.$.~ ," ';.~:;~~.. ~"I' '\'l."',t;'::;,~,iV, ,.~
't-: ,,', ...~\,., ,'x';''":';7R..}k\~:'/'';<'~J:\to.',~':~~~.~'''j;;~~~'~i':':.':;;~~'f:,~':j
,. ,~-< .'...,.", l"""",vl .."~)i"',,;...- ,."." '."d " '. ... ..,.,.c~..,"::: ....j",.. ~
,1_ <~'-''':''':~Y'':'~.{'' .')<N~/;,r.\:' ..~.":,:-::;){,...,;:~,,,~, ':,,:,:.,. , ;" ",i< :'..:l.']
,,<. ~-< 'I' "...~,.,,~,
,'''~. ... ,.- ..:..;:,.-.., ,.. -;.. ., ,",;. '.'"'':''' i f ':.I.I.';#" .
...{,..:, ,.,~. ..i' l~,.t""~:t:f. "":."';"'.'.-. \.- ,...:.c,.......tlf.>.,'.:..;...... .-""..'". ,. .~".:.i'-.~ ...,
Photo 10 - Posi-SheIl Right After Application
"
""
--
'"'~ -...-
"'~-"."
-_..~.
---.-"
'-_._.~-
Photo] 1 - Close Up
One Day After Application
'.
-"..
-'';':
-..", ,.
,
,,;,:,;:';".":.
......-
_f~- .\;:,
Photo 12 - Close Up
,
One Day After Application
~-
Photo 13 - Damage to Posi-Shell from Buzzards
-
Photo 14 - Damage to Posi-Shell from Buzzards
Photo 15 - Condition of Posi-Shell aftel' Rain Event
.-.'.
'..C
,'.'.'
',~ .
.
..
"fI-.
.,
'.', ..1.
" ,.t~,.-' .
~"'4r~""
;".' .~ '.
. .
..-
,,' '
,..,
.
.,-'v
f"""'''''w.'',
~:i:"'If:'4I"':1:
~'.."I"",j..
..
..
.
;.""
.
..
.-,'-.
......,,,:-.,j
_.".~",.v."':.,",---"
Photo 16 - Condition of Posi-Shell after Rain Event
-
Appendix 2
Performance Summary & Daily Scorecards
-,
"
- --"'~"
,-.,- .~ ~.. .-.
-~_.--
Collier County - Naples Landfill
ADC Pilot Project. Score Card Summary
Demonstrstlon and Pilot Testing of Posl-Shell and Crushsd Concrete as Altsmate Dally Cover
Date Odor Control Vector Litter Control Eros/on Appearance & Fire Control Rainfall
Control Control Operations
3/20/2007 2 1 1 0 2 0 0.00
3/21/2007 2 1 1 0 2 0 0.00
3/22/2007 2 2 2 0 2 0 0.Q1
3/23/2007 2 2 2 0 2 0 0.00
3/24/2007 2 2 2 0 2 0 0.00
3/25/2007
3/25/2007 2 2 2 0 0 0 0.00
3/27/2007 2 2 2 0 2 0 0.00
3128/2007 2 2 2 0 2 0 0.00
3/2912007 2 2 2 0 2 0 0.00
3/3012007 2 2 2 0 2 0 000
3/31/2007 0 2 2 0 2 0 000
4/1/2007
4/2/2007 1 2 2 0 2 0 0.00
413/2007 0 1 1 0 1 0 000
4/4/2007 1 2 2 0 2 0 0.00
4/5/2007 2 2 1 0 1 0 0.00
4/6/2007 1 1 1 0 1 0 0.00
4/7/2007 0 1 1 0 1 0 0.00
4/812007
4/9/2007 1 1 1 0 2 0 0.00
4110/2007 2 2 2 2 2 2 043
4/11/2007 2 1 2 0 2 0 0.20
4/12/2007 2 2 0 2 2 2 0.07
4/13/2007 2 2 2 2 2 2 0.10
4/14/2007 0 2 2 0 2 0 0.00
4115/2007
4116/2007 2 2 2 0 2 2 0.00
4/1712007 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
4/1812007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
411912007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
4/20/2007 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
412112007 0 1 1 1 2 0 0.00
4122/2007
4/23/2007 2 1 2 0 2 0 0.00
4/24/2007 1 1 1 0 1 0 0.00
4/25/2007 1 1 1 0 1 0 0.00
4/2612007 1 2 1 0 2 0 0.00
4/27/2007 1 1 1 0 1 0 0.00
4128/2007 0 0 1 0 1 0 000
4/2912007
4/3012007 1 1 1 0 1 0 0.98
51112007 1 1 1 0 1 0 0.00
51212007 1 1 1 0 1 0 0.00
5/3/2007 1 1 1 0 1 0 0.00
....., 51412007 -2 1 1 1 1 0 0.00
5/5/2007 0 1 0 1 1 0 0.00
5/612007
51712007 1 1 1 0 1 0 0.00
51812007 1 1 1 1 1 0 0.00
519/2007 1 1 1 0 1 0 0.00
511012007
5/1112007
5112/2007
5/1312007
511412007
5/1512007
511612007
511712007
5/1812007
511912007
512012007
512112007
5/22/2007
5/2312007
5/2412007
5/2512007
5126/2007
5/27/2007
5128/2007
5129/2007
513012007
513112007
-'-.. 6/112007
61212007
6/312007
61412007
61512007
61612007
6/712007
6/8/2007
6/912007
6/10/2007
6/11/2007
6/12/2007
6/13/2007 .
6/14/2007
6/15/2007
611612007
611712007
611812007 .
6/1912007
6/20/2007
6/21/2007
6/22/2007
6/23/2007
6/24/2007
6/25/2007
6/26/2007
612712007
6/28/2007
612912007
6130/2007
Average 1.11 1.30 1.25 0.23 1.39 0.18 0.04
-,-,- ,
,-"
-.._-_.",~
__.n,.
,-,-~-_._---
MALCOLM
PIRNIE
INDEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS
AND CONSULTANTS
Malcolm Plrnie. Inc.
8201 Peters Road, Suite 3400
Plantation. FL 33324
T: 954.761.3460 F: 954.761.793~
www.plrnie.ct.
December 23. 2009
Linda L. Jackson Best, M.B.A.
Strategic Planning and Contracts Manager
Solid Waste Management
Public Utilities Division
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
3301 Tamiami Trail East, Building H. 3rd Floor
Naples, FI.. 34112
Re: Landfill Operating Agreement. Proposed Fifth Amendment
Dear Ms. Best:
As requested I have review the proposed Fifth Amendment to the Landfill Operating Agreement
between Collier County and Waste Management Inc. of Florida. I have also reviewed supporting
documentation you provided. I conclude:
1. The proposed methodology for reimbursing Waste Management for cover material is a
significant improvement over the current methodology. The current method has lead to
disputes and was difficult to administer. The proposed method is simpler and clearer and
should be much easier to administer.
2. The Amendment permits Waste management to supplement soil cover material with
mulch and alternative daily cover. Technically these are sound alternatives which have
the potential to save money and save airspace while still being environmentally sound.
3. The proposed methodology gets the incentives right: Waste Management will be
encouraged to use a combination of soil. mulch, and alternative cover material so as to
save money and maximize airspace. This will benefit both the County and Waste
Management.
4. The proposed methodology for adjusting costs appears to be sound.
I would recommend that the Fifth Amendment be adopted.
Sincerely,
Malcolm Pi .e. Inc.
I
Stephe C. Schwarz. P.E..
V ice President
"'-J
RF
Solutions for Life~
..
,,~