Agenda 12/13/2011 Item # 8B12/13/2011 Item 82.
Recommendation to adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code
of Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance)
amending Schedules One, Three, Four, Seven, Eight and Nine of Appendix A, which are
the Road, Parks and Recreation, Correctional Facilities, Emergency Medical Services,
Library and General Government Building Impact Fee Rate Schedules, in accordance
with the adopted indexing methodology, utilizing a two -year average, which provides for a
reduction in rates; accepting the .calculation of the indexing percentage for the (Dependent)
Fire Impact Fees (Isles of Capri and Ochopee) in accordance with the adopted indexing
methodology, utilizing a two -year average, but providing that the current (Dependent) Fire
Impact Fee rates remain in effect, as provided in Schedule Five of Appendix A, rather than
increasing the fees as calculated; accepting the calculation of the indexing percentage for
the Educational Facilities (School) Impact Fees, in accordance with the adopted indexing
methodology, utilizing a two -year average, but providing that the. current Educational
Facilities (School) Impact Fee rates remain in effect, as set forth in Schedule Six of
Appendix A, as- those rates are lower than the rates that would be generated by the
application of the index, based on the 50% reduction of fees that was implemented in
October 2010; accepting the calculation of the indexing percentages for the Law
Enforcement Impact Fee in accordance with the adopted indexing methodology, utilizing a
two -year average, but providing that the Phase II Law Enforcement Impact Fee rates will
go into effect on December 20, 2011, as previously advertised and adopted, as the Phase II
rates are lower than those that would be generated by the application of the index; and
/'* providing for a delayed effective date of December 20, 2011, in order to provide time for
Ming with the Florida Department of State and notification to the local municipalities of
the new rates.
OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopts an Ordinance
implementing downward adjustments to the Road, Community Parks, Regional Parks,
Correctional Facilities (Jail), Emergency Medical Services, Library and Government Buildings
Impact Fees, based on application of the adopted indexing methodology, providing that the
current Dependent Fire (Isles of Capri and Ochopee) Impact Fees remain in place, rather than
implementing a fee increase, providing that the current Educational Facilities (School) Impact
Fees remain in place as the current rates are lower than those that would be generated by the
calculated index, and providing that the Law Enforcement Phase 11 Impact Fee rates will
become effective on December 20, 2011, as previously advertised and adopted, as the rates are
lower than those that would be generated by the application. of the index.
CONSIDERATIONS: On April 28,".2 the Board adopted Ordinance 2009 -17, which
amended the Code of Laws aml:Ordi .(Code) to reflect a change to the use of a two -year
average model -from the 10 -year regress- Uwanalysis model to Calculate the various indices, as
this method is intended to be more responsive to cost fluctuations.
In 2011, Community Parks, Regional Parks, Library, Road, Emergency Medical Services (EMS),
Correctional Facilities (Jail), Government Buildings and I Law Enforcement Impact Fees are
scheduled to be indexed using the adopted (two -year average) methodology. Additionally, during
Packet Page -343 -.
12/13/2011 Item 8.6.
the adoption of the School Impact Fee Update Study in October 2011, staff advised that the
School Index would also be included in the indexing presentation.
Four measures are used (land costs, building costs, building equipment costs and transportation
costs), alone or in combination, to calculate the indexing.percentages for the various impact fees.
Using the two -year average methodology, the most recent, available data relate_ d to the individual
indices is used in the calculation.
Based on the information above, the total indexing percentage is then calculated) for each of the
individual impact fees. Detailed information related to impact fee indexing is included as
backup to this Executive Summary (Attachment "A').
I
2011 Inslez
Transportation (Road)
-6.2%
Community Parks
-5.1%
Regional Parks
-8.9%
Correctional Facilities (Jail)
-0.7%
EMS
Library
-0.6%
Government Buildings
-1.4%
Dependent Fire
0.5%
Educational Facilities (School)
-1.1
Law Enforcement
-0.5%
The impact fee with the largest percentage of inventory value attributed to land ;(Regi+t►t)
experienced the most significant downward adjustment in the calculated index. On the converse,
the impact fee inventory value in the Dependent fire Districts of Isles of Capri and Ochopee is
equipment and vehicles, which is. an index that is declining from prior years but still remains
positive. While a minor increase in impact fees for the Dependent Fire Districts is supported by
the calculation using the adopted indexing methodology, staff recommends that the Dependent
Fire Impact Fee rates remain at the current, adopted level thereby forgoing the fee increase.
Tr 2Mjg[%ou Q9A#LIndex: In 2010, because of the notable cost decreases experienced
throughout Florida, staff initiated a detailed review of the cost and credit components of the
Road Impact Fee by way of a "Cost and Credit Update" with Tindale - Oliver and Associates, Inc,
Packet Page -344-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
which replaced the scheduled annual indexing. The update analyzed the key components of the
Road Impact Fee calculations which develop the impact fee rates.
The resulting rate reductions from the Cost and Credit Update were an average decrease of 32%
for both residential and commercial construction which became effective October 8, 2010. An
additional average reduction of approximately 10 %, related to the transfer of the utility relocate
component from the Road Impact Fee to the appropriate utility rates became effective on March
1, 2011, for a total average decrease of 42 %. Attachment `B" provides a complete list of the
recent impact fee reductions adopted by the Board.
As provided above, the results of the calculation of the 2011 index for Road Impact Fees
provides for a 6.5% decrease in rates, however, it is important to note that staff and the impact
fee consultant (Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc.) agree that there appears to be an upturn in
costs based on both recent bids and information gathered throughout the State. The Productivity
Committee, as part of their recommendation related to the 2011 Indexing, suggested that the
formal update (3 -year) of the Road Impact Fees, which is required in 2012, be initiated as soon
as possible in order to best analyze the current cost conditions. Staff concurs with this
recommendation.
Educational Facilities (School) Index On August 19, 2010, the District School Board of
Collier County voted unanimously to recommend a 50% reduction of School Impact Fees for a
period of two years, and on August 23, 2010, the Chairman of the District School Board of
Collier County provided correspondence to the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners
requesting that the School Board recommendation be placed on a Board of County
Commissioners' agenda for discussion and vote. This reduction was approved by the Board on
October 12, 2010. Since the reduction in fees in October 2010, the formal update of the School
Impact Fees was completed and adopted by the Board on October 11, 2011. The impact fee rates
calculated by the update study were higher than the fees implemented under the 50% reduction,
and the Board elected to accept the update study, but also directed that the current, reduced rates
remain in effect, as these rates were lower than those calculated in the update study. The
position was consistent with the positions of the Collier County Advisory Committees that
reviewed the study as well as the School Board recommendation.
During the adoption of the School Impact Fee Update Study in October 2011, staff advised that
the School Index would also be included in the indexing presentation. As indicated above, the
calculated index for School Impact Fees is -1.1 %. The -1.1% reduction would then be applied to
the full impact fee rates in the adopted impact fee study. Because this is a minor decrease, the
indexed fees remain higher than the current, adopted rates, due to the voluntary 50% reduction
that was implemented. Therefore, staff recommends that the current rates remain in effect.
Attachment "C" provides a comparison of the full, indexed and adopted School Impact Fee rates.
Law Enforcement Index On December 14, 2010, the Board adopted the Law Enforcement
Impact Fee Update Study and a phased implementation of the rates. This option provided an
immediate decrease ( -25% residential and -33% commercial) in all land use categories with a
phase -in to the full rates proposed by the study over the next two years (December 2011 and
1000N December 2012). This option addressed the immediate economic situation, by providing impact
Packet Page -345-
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
fee relief at a level consistent with earlier adopted impact fee reductions, but also accounted for
the County's investment in law enforcement infrastructure by implementing the full, proposed
fee in the third year. The phased implementation is scheduled to occur as follows:
December 2010 — implement 60% of the proposed impact fee rate schedule
December 2011 — implement 80% of the proposed impact fee rate schedule
December 2012 — implement 100% of the proposed impact fee rate schedule
Calendar Year 2013 — Impact Fee Update Study begins
Under this scenario, impact fees are being generated at less than the amount attributable to the
demands created by growth for the first two years of the phased implementation. While this
scenario has implications both for the repayment of debt as well as future
construction/acquisition of capital improvements, phasing is a method that is frequently used
throughout the State, related to impact fee increases.
Based on the results of the indexing calculation related to Law Enforcement Impact Fees, which
is a 0.5% reduction, applied to the full fee, staff recommends that the Phase II Law Enforcement
Impact Fee rates go into effect, as scheduled on December 20, 2011, as they are lower than those
generated by applying the index. Attachment "D" provides a comparison of the Law
Enforcement rates.
The Annual Indexing package, including the reductions, fees to remain constant and information
related to the Phase II Law Enforcement Impact Fee rates, was presented to the Productivity
Committee on November 16, 2011 for their review and recommendations. The committee
recommended that the indexing package be approved and implemented, as described in this
Executive Summary, and that the formal update (3 -year) of the Road Impact Fees, which is
required in 2012, be initiated as soon as possible in order to best analyze the current cost
conditions. Staff concurs with this recommendation.
The information related to the Annual Indexing will be presented to the Development Services
Advisory Committee (DSAC) on December 7, 2011 for their review and recommendations. Due
to the timing for submittal of this Executive Summary and the date of the DSAC meeting, the
recommendations of the DSAC will be read into the record during the Advertised Public Hearing
for this item.
FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue projections related to the individual impact fees depend heavily
on the permitting trends during the corresponding time period. Changes in permitting activity
will directly affect this impact fee revenue stream. The specified reductions are proposed to go
into effect on December 20, 2011; therefore, any permits applied for on or after that date will
receive the lower rates. The statutory minimum 90 -day notice is not required for impact fee
reductions. The Law Enforcement Impact Fee rates were adopted with a prescribed phase -in
over three years, which are date specific.
Based upon actual impact fee collections and current permitting activity and forecasts, the
following is the projected change in impact fee revenue associated to the indexing/ rate revisions
Packet Page -346-
n
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
assuming that development activity remains constant. Any change in activity will directly affect
the impact fee collections.
Impact Fee
Potential Change in Annual Collections
Based on Current Activity
Transportation (Road)
($347,000)
Community Parks
($58,000)
Regional Parks
($112,400)
Correctional Facilities
($3,450)
Emergency Medical Services
($1,980)
Library
($2,340)
Government Buildings
($10,300)
Dependent Fire
n/a
Educational Facilities
n/a
Law Enforcement
$64,900
Examples of the rate reductions applicable to common land uses are included as attachments to
this Executive Summary (Attachment "E ").
In many of the impact fee reductions adopted over the past 18 months, declining costs have been
the primary factors in driving the reductions. In the case of the Law Enforcement Impact Fee,
the update study proposed to increase the majority of land use categories based on increases in
inventory value and a significantly reduced credit. Use of the phased implementation allowed
for an immediate reduction in rates, similar to decreases adopted in other impact fee categories,
but is slowly bringing the impact fee rates to the full, calculated fee. The index is calculated
annually in order to determine any adjustments to the full fee that may be required prior to
implementation of that full fee. There is a projected increase in Law Enforcement Impact Fee
revenue, assuming permitting trends that are stable and similar to the prior year, however, the
increase is less than if the full fee, less the 0.5% indexing reduction, was implemented. The
amount of this potential shortfall totals an estimated $79,500.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The concepts of annual indexing and impact fee
updates are consistent with Objective 2 of the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Collier
County Growth Management Plan (GMP) states: "Future development will bear a proportionate
cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth."
Packet Page -347-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Additionally, this approach is consistent with Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, which is the
Florida Impact Fee Act 2006, requiring the most recent and localized data be used in impact fee
calculations.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney, is legally
sufficient, and requires majority vote for approval. -JAK
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners adopts an Ordinance
amending Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County
Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance) implementing downward adjustments to the Road,
Community Parks, Regional Parks, Correctional Facilities (Jail), Emergency Medical Services,
Library and Government Buildings Impact Fees, based on application of the adopted indexing
methodology, providing that the current Dependent Fire (Isles of Capri and Ochopee) Impact
Fees remain in place, rather than implementing a fee increase, providing that the Current
Educational Facilities (School) Impact Fees remain in place as the current rates are lower than
those that would be generated by the calculated index, and providing that the Law Enforcement
Phase II Impact Fee rates will become effective on December 20, 2011, as previously advertised
and adopted, as the rates are lower than those that would be generated by the application of the
index; and providing for a delayed effective date of December 20, 2011, in order to provide time
for filing with the Florida Department of State and notification to the local municipalities of the
new rates, and further direct the County Manager, or his designee, to initiate the process for
conducting the required 2012 Transportation (Road) Impact Fee Update Study, in accordance
with the recommendation of the Productivity Committee.
Prepared by: Amy Patterson, Impact Fee and Economic Development Manager
Growth Management Division — Planning and Regulation
Attachments:
1) Proposed Ordinance Amendment; 2) Attachment A — Indexing; 3) 2011 Indexing Update; 4) 2009
Methodology Report; 5) Attachment B — Impact Fee Reductions; 6) Attachment C — School rate
comparisons; 7) Attachment D — Law Enforcement rate comparisons; 8) Attachment E — Impact Fee
Comparisons
11�
Packet Page -348-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 8.13.
Item Summary: Recommendation to adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 74 of the
Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances (The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee
Ordinance) amending Schedules One, Three, Four, Seven, Eight and Nine of Appendix A, which
are the Road, Parks and Recreation, Correctional Facilities, Emergency Medical Services, Library
and General Government Building Impact Fee Rate Schedules, in accordance with the adopted
indexing methodology, utilizing a two -year average, which provides for a reduction in rates;
accepting the calculation of the indexing percentage for the (Dependent) Fire Impact Fees (Isles
of Capri and Ochopee) in accordance with the adopted indexing methodology, utilizing a two -
year average, but providing that the current (Dependent) Fire Impact Fee rates remain in effect,
as provided in Schedule Five of Appendix A, rather than increasing the fees as calculated;
accepting the calculation of the indexing percentage for the Educational Facilities (School)
Impact Fees, in accordance with the adopted indexing methodology, utilizing a two -year
average, but providing that the current Educational Facilities (School) Impact Fee rates remain
in effect, as set forth in Schedule Six of Appendix A, as those rates are lower than the rates that
would be generated by the application of the index, based on the 50% reduction of fees that
was implemented in October 2010; accepting the calculation of the indexing percentages for
the Law Enforcement Impact Fee in accordance with the adopted indexing methodology,
utilizing a two -year average, but providing that the Phase II Law Enforcement Impact Fee rates
will go into effect on December 20, 2011, as previously advertised and adopted, as the Phase II
rates are lower than those that would be generated by the application of the index; and
providing for a delayed effective date of December 20, 2011, in order to provide time for filing
with the Florida Department of State and notification to the local municipalities of the new
rates.
Meeting Date: 12/13/2011
Prepared By
Name: PattersonAmy
Title: Manager - Impact Fees & EDC,Business Management &
11/17/2011 12:55:03 PM
Approved By
Packet Page -349-
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, CDES
Date: 11/22/20114:44:31 PM
Name: CasalanguidaNick
Title: Deputy Administrator - GMD,Business Management & Budget Office
Date: 11/22/20114:53:25 PM
Name: FederNorman
Title: Administrator - Growth Management Div,Transportati
Date: 11/23/2011 10:32:35 AM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 11/23/20112:48:31 PM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Director -Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs,CMO
Date: 11/29/20119:50:34 AM
Name: OchsLeo
Title: County Manager
Date: 11/30/20112:56:16 PM
Packet Page -350-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
W
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
ORDINANCE NO. 2011-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 74 OF
THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES
(THE COLLIER COUNTY CONSOLIDATED IMPACT FEE
ORDINANCE) AMENDING SCHEDULES ONE, THREE, FOUR,
SEVEN, EIGHT AND NINE OF APPENDIX A, WHICH ARE THE
ROAD, PARKS AND RECREATION, CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES
(JAIL), EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES, LIBRARY AND
GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDING IMPACT FEE RATE
SCHEDULES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED INDEXING
METHODOLOGY, UTILIZING A TWO -YEAR AVERAGE, WHICH
PROVIDES FOR A REDUCTION IN RATES; ACCEPTING THE
CALCULATION OF THE INDEXING PERCENTAGE FOR THE
(DEPENDENT) FIRE IMPACT FEES (ISLES OF CAPRI AND
OCHOPEE) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED INDEXING
METHODOLOGY, UTILIZING A TWO -YEAR AVERAGE, BUT
PROVIDING THAT THE CURRENT (DEPENDENT) FIRE IMPACT
FEE RATES REMAIN IN EFFECT, AS PROVIDED IN SCHEDULE
FIVE OF APPENDIX A, RATHER THAN INCREASING THE FEES
AS CALCULATED; ACCEPTING THE CALCULATION OF THE
INDEXING PERCENTAGE FOR THE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
(SCHOOL) IMPACT FEES, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
n ADOPTED INDEXING METHODOLOGY, UTILIZING A TWO -
YEAR AVERAGE, BUT PROVIDING THAT THE CURRENT
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES (SCHOOL) IMPACT FEE RATES
REMAIN IN EFFECT, AS SET FORTH IN SCHEDULE SIX OF
APPENDIX A, AS THOSE RATES ARE LOWER THAN THE RATES
THAT WOULD BE GENERATED BY THE APPLICATION OF THE
INDEX, BASED ON THE 50% REDUCTION OF FEES THAT WAS
IMPLEMENTED IN OCTOBER 2010; ACCEPTING THE
CALCULATION OF THE INDEXING PERCENTAGES FOR THE
LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPACT FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
ADOPTED INDEXING METHODOLOGY, UTILIZING A TWO -
YEAR AVERAGE, BUT PROVIDING THAT THE PHASE II LAW
ENFORCEMENT IMPACT FEE RATES WILL GO INTO EFFECT
ON DECEMBER 20, 2011, AS PREVIOUSLY ADVERTISED AND
ADOPTED, AS THE PHASE II RATES ARE LOWER THAN THOSE
THAT WOULD BE GENERATED BY THE APPLICATION OF THE
INDEX; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE
OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR A DELAYED
EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECEMBER 20, 2011.
Underlined text is added; SgaslF tlFexgh text is deleted
Packet Page -351-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
WHEREAS, Collier County uses impact fees to supplement the funding of necessary
capital improvements required to provide public facilities to serve new population and related
development that is necessitated by growth in Collier County; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has used impact fees as a funding source for growth- related
capital improvements for various facilities since 1978; and
WHEREAS, on March 13, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners adopted
Ordinance No. 2001 -13, the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, repealing and
superseding all of the County's then existing impact fee regulations, and consolidating all of the
County's impact fee regulations into that one Ordinance, codified in Chapter 74 of the Collier
County Code of Laws and Ordinances (the "Code "); and
WHEREAS, in October of 2002 the Board of County Commissioners directed that
during the upcoming required three -year updates of the individual impact fees that methodology
also be developed to provide for the annual indexing of the fees in the years between the formal
updates; and
WHEREAS, on February 28, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners directed that
the indexing methodology for each of the impact fees be reviewed and revised, as appropriate, to
reflect localized information; and
n
WHEREAS, Collier County retained Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. to complete the
study to localize the indexing methodologies; and
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2007 the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance
2007 -57, thereby adopting the "Collier County Impact Fee Indexing Study," and amending the
Code to reflect the new indexing provisions and amended rates; and
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2008 the Board of County Commissioners directed that the
Productivity Committee be afforded the opportunity to review the indexing methodology based
on the Committee's request to consider the appropriateness of an indexing model that is more
sensitive to the current economic conditions; and
WHEREAS, Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. completed the report entitled the
"Collier County Indexing Methodology Study, " which amended portions of the adopted "Collier
County Impact Fee Indexing Study" and recommended that a two -year average be utilized to
calculate the various indices; and
Underlined text is added; Stmaktkreugh text is deleted
Page 2 of 16
Packet Page -352-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance
No. 2009 -17, amending the Code by implementing the revised indexing methodology; and
WHEREAS, in 2011, Community Parks, Regional Parks, Library, Transportation
(Road), Educational Facilities (School), Dependent Fire, Emergency Medical Services (EMS),
Correctional Facilities (Jail), Government Buildings, and Law Enforcement Impact Fees are
scheduled to be indexed, using the adopted methodology; and
WHEREAS, the indexing calculations have been completed resulting in a decrease in
rates of 5.1% for Community Parks, a decrease in rates of 8.9% for Regional Parks, a decrease in
rates of 0.6% for Library, a decrease in rates of 6.2% for Road, a decrease in rates of 1.1% for
School, a decrease in rates of 1.6% for EMS, a decrease in rates of 0.7% for Jail, a decrease in
rates of 1.4% for Government Buildings, a decrease in rates of 0.5% for Law Enforcement and
an increase in rates of 0.5% for Dependent Fire Impact Fees; and
WHEREAS, with respect to this annual indexing, staff recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners implement the decreases to Community Parks, Regional Parks, Library,
Road, EMS, Government Buildings and Jail; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the increase to Dependent Fire Impact Fees (Isles of
Capri and Ochopee) not be implemented, but rather the current impact fee rates remain in place;
and
WHEREAS, with respect to School Impact Fees, staff recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners accept the indexing calculation, but direct that the current, adopted
School Impact Fees remain in effect as they are lower than the fees that would be generated by
the application of the index, based on the 50% reduction of fees that was implemented in
October 2010, and
WHEREAS, with respect to the Law Enforcement Impact Fees, staff recommends that
the Board of County Commissioners accept the indexing calculation, but direct that the Law
Enforcement Phase II Impact Fees, scheduled to go into effect on December 20, 2011 as
previously advertised and adopted, remain on schedule for that implementation, as the Phase II
rates are lower than those that would be generated by the application of the index, and
WHEREAS, staff has thoroughly reviewed the calculations and findings and concurs
with the results of the calculations and the study; and
Underlined text is added; &4usk-dffe%4 text is deleted
Page 3 of 16
Packet Page -353-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt this
Ordinance to implement the recommended changes; and
WHEREAS, Section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, which is the Florida Impact Fee Act,
requires the most recent and localized data be used in impact fee calculations and this annual
index complies with that requirement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE. Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and
Ordinances 'is hereby amended as set forth in the attachment to this Ordinance.
SECTION TWO. CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY.
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other
applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the n
remaining portions.
SECTION THREE. INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES.
The provisions of this Ordinance shall be made a part of the Code of Laws and
Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re-
lettered and internal cross - references amended throughout to accomplish such, and the word
"ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word.
SECTION FOUR. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall be considered adopted upon the date written below and subject to
filing with the Florida Department of State; however, for administrative purposes the effective
date of the fee schedules shall be delayed to December 20, 2011.
M
Underlined text is added; Stmal, threugh text is deleted
Page 4 of 16
Packet Page -354-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida this
ATTEST
Dwight E. Brock, Clerk
Lion
Jeffrey
County
day of , 2011.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
LION
, Deputy Clerk
legal sufficiency:
FRED COYLE, Chairman
Underlined text is added; Struck through text is deleted
Page 5 of 16
Packet Page -355-
APPENDIX A -SCHEDULE ONE
ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
Phase!! Effective Mareb 1, 2011 December 20, 2011
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Residential
Assisted Living Facility (ALF)
Condo/Townhouse (1 -2 Stories)
High -Rise Condominium (3+ Stories)
Mobile Home
Multi - Family (Apartments) 1 -10 Stories
Multi - Family (Apartments) >10 Stories
Retirement Community
Single Family Detached House
Less than 1,500 sq. ft.
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft.
2,500 sq. ft or larger
Non - Residential
Auto Sales - Luxury
Auto Sales - New/Used
Bank/Savings: Drive -in
Bank/Savings: Walk -in
Business Park
Car Wash - Automatic
Car Wash - Self - Service
Church
Rate
$986.90 $949.82
Per Dwelling Unit
$4;537.96 S4,255.7
Per Dwelling Unit
e',�, 292.00 .03 87.84
Per Dwelling Unit
$2,mL' 557 .0V $2.394.71
Per Dwelling Unit
$4,399 -A6 4$ .313.86
Per Dwelling Unit
$2.923.00 $2,741.77
Per Dwelling Unit
$66.00 S2,125.50
Per Dwelling Unit
$4,s io .00 $4,230.38 Per Dwelling Unit
$6,193.00 $5,752.75 Per Dwelling Unit
$6,934.00 S6,504.09 Per Dwelling Unit
$8;8x4,09 S8,32181
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
$14,451.00 $13.555.03
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
$23,405.09 521.953.89
Per 1,000 sq. ft
$21,984m 521.558.99
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
$8,3o.89 S7,801,34
Per 1,000 sq. ft
$22,663.0 $21,257.89
Per 1,000 sq. ft
521,0;6.0 S19,722.38
Per Service Bay
$339 -99 $317.98
Per Seat
Underlined text is added, Sim& thre text is deleted
Page 6 of 16
Packet Page -356-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
1111
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Couege/University (Private)
<7,501 Students
>7,500 Students
Convenience Store (24 hours)
Convenience Store w /Gas Pumps
4 or less Fuel Positions
5 - 6 Fuel Positions
7 - 8 Fuel Positions
9 - 10 Fuel Positions
11 - 12 Fuel Positions
13 or more Fuel Positions
Dance Studios/Gymnastics
Day Care
Furniture Store
Gasoline)Service Station
General Light Industrial
Golf Course
Home Improvement Store
Hospital
Hotel
Hotel - All Suites
Manufacturing
Marina
Mine/Commercial Excavation
Mini- Warehouse
Motel
Movie Theater
Nursing Home
Office 50,000 sq: ft. or less
Office 50,001- 100,000 sq. ft
Office 100,001 - 200,000 sq. ft.
Office 200,001- 400,000 sq. ft.
Office Greater than 400,000 sq. ft
Office - Medical Greater than 10,000 sq. ft
Office - Medical 10,000 sq. ft. or less
Rate
1.3,99 S1,325.39
557-00 $1,000.94
25:99 $52,648. 06
34.90 $20,198.89
38:88 $16.375.60
89:9 $13.964,00
639 $11,879.77
89 99 1� 0.795.44
72-N S9,822.73
Q-w 56.295.85
56.00 S802.92
89:99 $2,053.28
66-88 $4,376.70
11:89 $4,332.62
27 99 $428.222.32
49-09 S5,486.36
X99 $9,394.07
i5-09 $3.672.27
50-W $2,204.30
33 99
$2,394,71
98-09 $1,967.92
$6-99
44,89 $882.65
93 89 $2,347.81
6849 $25,202.18
3889 692.24
939 $9,290.89
43 88 $7,919.53
05.89 $6.758.29
42-09 S5,761.19
96.0 $5,249.04
;6. $22,301.88
4700 $14,780,06
Per Student
Per Student
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Per Fuel Position
Per Fuel Position
Per Fuel Position
Per Fuel Position
Per Fuel Position
Per Fuel Position
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Per Student
Per 1,000 sq, ft.
Per Fuel Position
Per 1,000 sq. ft
Per 18 Holes
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Per 1,000 sq. R
Per Room
Per Room
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Per Berth (Dry/Wet)
Per 1,000 cubic yards
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Per Room
Per Screen
Per Bed
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Per 1,000 sq. ft
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Underlined text is added; StmelH#eagh text is deleted
Page 7 of 16
Packet Page -357-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Impact Fee Land Use Category Rate
Pharmacy/Drug Store
$9,196.0 S7,678.46
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Quick Lube
$8,444.00 S7,920.47
Per Servuce Bay
Restaurant - Drive -In
5993789 $74.793.30
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Restaurant - High Turnover
$1,435.00 S1,346,03
Per Seat
Restaurant - Quality
$994.09 $847.95
Per Seat
Retail 50,000 Sq. Ft. or Less
54133399 105 .838.59
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 50,001- 100,000 Sq. Ft.
$11,706.09 $10,980.22
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 100,001- 150,000 Sq. Ft.
$10,924.00 $10.246.71
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 150,001- 200,000 Sq. Ft.
$10,465 -99 $9,816.17
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 200,001-100,000 Sq. Ft.
$9,909.0 9 294.64
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 400,001- 600,000 Sq. Ft.
$9,896.09 $9,292.44
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 600,001 - 1,000,000 Sq. Ft.
M9,749.00 $10,074.12
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail >1,000,000 Sq. Ft.
c+90 $10,595.64
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail - Specialty
sis'728.90 $14.752.86
Per 1,000 sq. ft
RV Park
$1,363.00 $1-278.49
Per Site
School - Elementary (Private)
$623-00 $584.37
Per Student
School - Middle (Private)
$870.90 $816.06
Per Student
School - High School (Private)
$920.09 $862.96
Per Student
Supermarket
$15,466.09 $14,507.10
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Tire Store
66,457.90 $6,056.66
Per So-vice Bay
Warehouse
$2,352.90 $2,206.17
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Und dined text is added; 80"t dwouO text is deleted
Page 8 of 16
Packet Page -358-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
12/13/2011 Item 8.13 .
APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE THREE
PARKS AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
Effective Aetebetlg, 201 A December. 20.2011
Community Parks
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Rate
Hotel/Motel
144;9:3; $455.11
Per Room
Mobile Home/RV Park
$901.26 $855.29
Per Unit/Site
Multi - Family
W8.0; $643.43
Per Dwelling Unit
Single Family Detached House
43.7T $1,041.97
Per Dwelling Unit
Less than 1,500 sq. ft.
$1,142.67- $1.084.39
Per Dwelling Unit
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft.
$1,294.04 $1,190.08
Per Dwelling Unit
2,500 sq. ft. or larger
$1;3:80 $1,307.53
Per Dwelling Unit
Regional Parks
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Rate
HoteVMotel W5.02
$833.58
Per Room
Mobile Home/RV Park $1,699.04
SI.537.80
Per Unit/Site
Multi - Family $ i, i
43.7T $1,041.97
Per Dwelling Unit
Single Family Detached House
Less than 1,500 sq. ft. a / >
S1,765.45
Per Dwelling Unit
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft. `',132.47
$1,942.68
Per Dwelling Unit
2,500 sq. ft. or larger $3;349.43
$2,140.34
Per Dwelling Unit
Note: Community Parks Impact Fees do not apply
to the City of Naples,
City of Marco Island or Everglades City.
Underlined text is added; Struek through text is deleted
Page 9 of 16
Packet Page -359-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE FOUR
CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES (JAIL) EWPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
Phase 2 - Effective FeWeart 44,3810 December 20, 2011
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Rate
PeF Dwelling unit
Per 1,000 sq. ft
Residential
$604.17
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Assisted Living Facility 12;031
S209,03
Per Dwelling Unit
Mobile Home/RV tie -down $374.91
S372,18
Per Dwelling Unit/Site
Multi -Family $354.1-5
1252.37
Per Dwelling Unit
Single Family
$410.42
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Less than 1,500 sq. ft. $446.36
$443.23
Per Dwelling Unit
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft 5494
-7i S48930
Per Dwelling Unit
2,500 sq. R or larger 5339:67
5535.89
Per Dwelling Unit
Non - Residential
5249:31
Auto Sales (New/Used) $435
-99 5435.91
PeF Dwelling unit
Per 1,000 sq. ft
Bank /Savings: Drive-in $698.43
$604.17
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Bank/Savings: Walk -In $639:77
5655.15
Per 1,000 sq. R
Business Park $254.15
5252.37
Per 1,000 sq. ft
Car Wash - Self- Service $136.68
5155.50
Per Service Bay
Car Wash - Automated $41332
$410.42
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Church $146.33
5145.30
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
collegelUniversity (Private)
</,501
$25.67 S25.49
Per Student
>7,500
si;.97 517.84
Per Student
Convenience Store (24 hours) $1,404.26
$1,394A3
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Convenience Store w /Gas Pumps $1,496:68
$1,48620
Per Fuel Position
Day Care S12
84 512.75
Per Student
Furniture Store $61.61
JJM
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Gasoline/Service Station 530831
S504,75
Per Fuel Position
Golf Course $4,999.64
54.95530
Per 18 Holes
Underlined text is added; Swmk doefth text is deleted
Page 10 of 16
Packet Page -360-
Impact Fee Land Use Category Rate
Home Improvement Store $436.96
5453.76
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hospital $423:39
$420.62
Per 1,000 sq. ft
Hotel $282
-8i 5201.39
Per Room
Industrial - General Light 5
S175.90
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Luxury Auto Sales $284.96
$282.96
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Marina $45.78
$48.43
Per Berth
Mini - Warehouse 5
i ;.97 $17.84
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Motel $192.54
$191.19
Per Room
Movie Theater $1,535.19
S1.524.44
Per Screen
Nursing Home $184.94
V83.54
Per Bed
Office 50,000 sq. ft. or less $36434
5361.98
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 50,001 - 100,000 sq. ft. W;i.i
S329.85
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 100,001 - 200,000 sq. ft. $252.39
$280.41
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 200,001 - 400,000 sq. ft. $24132
$239.63
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office Greater than 400,000 sq, ft. $285.38
$203.94
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office - Medical $44136
$438.46
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Pharmacy/Drug Store $495.4
S492,00
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Quick Lube 5288
5295.71
Per Service Bay
RV Park &138:63
$137.65
Per Site
Restaurant - Fast Food w/Drive -In $2,343.9;
52.296.85
Per 1,000 sq. ft
Restaurant - High Turnover $6931
568.82
Per seat
Restaurant - Quality $56.48
556.08
Per seat
Retail 50,000 Sq. Ft. or Less $629.96
$624.55
Per 1,000 sq. ft
Retail 50,001- 100,000 Sq. Ft. $6x3:47
S670.44
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 100,001 - 150,000 Sq. Ft. $688:72
$596.51
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 150,001- 200,000 Sq. Ft. Wa
1.63 $726.52
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 200,001- 400,000 Sq. Ft. $641.80
5637.30
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 400,001- 600,000 Sq. Ft. $654.64
5650.05
Per 1,000 sq. ft
Retail 600,001 - 1,000,000 Sq. Ft, $634.64
$650.05
Per 1,000 sq. ft
Retail >1,000,000 Sq. Ft. $33634
$532.78
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail - Specialty $433.86
5430.82
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
School - Elementary (Private) $15.48
515.29
Per Student
School - Middle (Private) $197
17.84
Per Student
School - High School (Private) $20.54
$20-39
Per Student
Supermarket $326:25
5522.59
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Tire Store $344.08
$341.59
Per Service Bay
Underlined text is added; Seugk text is deleted
Page I I of 16
Packet Page -361-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE SEVEN
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
Effective November 1 18 December 20, 2011
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Rate
Residential
Less than 1,500 sq. ft.
$88.43 587.01
Per Dwelling Unit
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft.
$95.93 S9437
Per Dwelling Unit
2,500 sq. ft or larger
5196.11 S104.41
Per Dwelling Unit
Assisted Living Facility
$65.78 15AM
Per Dwelling Unit
Non- Residential
Auto Sales - Luxury
$75.5 S74.29
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Auto Sales - New/Used
a i� SJ 14.44
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Bank /Savings: Drive -In
siss.0 $152.60
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Bank/Savings: Walk -In
$174.81 $172.01
Per 1,000 sq. R
Business Park
$67.34 66.26
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Car Wash - Self- Service
$44-49 R . 2
Per Service Bay
Car Wash - Automated
$19431 $107.75
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Church
$384 $38.14
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
College/University (Private)
7,500 students or less
$6 SA $6.69
Per Student
More than 7,500 students
$4.68
Per Student
Convenience Store (24 hours)
$372.0 $366.11
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Convenience Store w /Gas Pumps
$295.8 $291.15
Per Fuel Position
Furniture Store
$16.32 16.05
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Day Care
53-0 $3.34
Per Student
Gasoline/Service Station
$134.68 $132.52
Per Fuel Position
General Light Industrial
$46.93 $46.17
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Golf Course
$1,322.31 S1,301.15
Per 18 Holes
Hoare Improvement Store
$121.09 S119,14
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hospital
$185 -:43 5103.74
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hotel
$60.33 49.52
Per Room
Marina
$12112 12.71
Per Berth
Underlined text is added; Soaek-threngh text is deleted
Page 12 of 16
Packet Page -362-
MGM,
Impact Fee Land Use Category Rate
Mini - Warehouse
$4-76
54.68
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Motel
$46:43
$46 1?
Per Room
Movie Theater
$486:76
$400.25
Per Screen
Nursing Home
$48-47
$48 .18
Per Bed
Office 50,000 sq. ft. or less
$96.59
12LM
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 50,001- 100,000 sq. ft.
$82:38
80.98
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 100,001- 200,000 sq. ft.
$70.96
568.93
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 200,001400,000 sq. ft.
$39.86
$58.90
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office Greater than 400,000 sq. ft
$34.4
5$ 3.54
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office - Medical
S 16.99
$115.11
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Phwnukcy/Drug Store
c,
S129,17
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Quick Lube
$79.99
12LU
Per Service Bay
Restaurant - Fast Food w/Drive -In
$612 -86
$603.05
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Restaurant - High Turnover
V8.3
18.07
Per seat
Restaurant - Quality
$3496
14.72
Per seat
Retail 50,000 sq. ft. or less
$166.65
5163.98
Per 1,000 sq. R
Retail 50,001 - 100,000 sq. ft.
$733
S164.65
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 100,001 - 150,000 sq. ft.
$;-33.85
$150.6 0
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 150,001- 200,000 sq. R
$187.86
$184.0 6
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 200,001- 400,000 sq. tt
3-1-3939
$156.62
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 400,001 - 600,000 sq. ft
645.97
$163.31
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 600,0014,000,000 sq. ft
$164.61
$161.97
Per 1,000 sq. ft
Retail >1,000,000 sq. ft.
$142.16
$139.88
Per 1,000 sq. R
Retail - Specialty
S11445
$113.11
Per 1,000 sq. ft
RV Park
$36:73
$36.14
Per Site
School - Elementary (Private)
$4:88
$4.01
Per Student
School - Middle (Private)
$4.76
$4.68
Per Student
School - High School (Private)
&5744
$5.35
Per Student
Supermarket
$1344
S137.2 0
Per 1,000 sq. R
Tire Store
WAS
89.69
Per Service Bay
Underlined text is added; SWUsk-thMigh text is deleted
Page 13 of 16
Packet Page -363-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
r__ -. 12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE EIGHT
LIBRARY IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
Effective December 20, 380 2011
Impact Fee Land Use Category Rate
Mobile Home/RV Park
$237.99 $236.56
Per Unit/Site
Multi- Family
$161.26 $160.28
Per Dwelling Unit
Single Family Detached House
Less than 1,500 sq, ft.
$2937 $289.62
Per Dwelling Unit
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft.
$3i6A5 $315.04
Per Dwelling Unit
2,500 sq. ft. or larger
$951 349.31
Per Dwelling Unit
I
Underlined text is added; S4wekdreagg text is deleted
Page 14 of 16
Packet Page -364-
APPENDIX A - SCHEDULE NINE
GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDING IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
Effective December 20, 3918 2011
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Rate
$435.81
Residential
Auto Sales - (Now/Used) $681
Assisted Living Facility $327.09
$322.42
Per Dwelling Unit
Mobile Home $381
-98 $572.86
Per Dwelling Unit/Site
Multi - Family $394
-0 8 388.48
Per Dwelling Unit
Single Family
Bank/Savings: Walk -In 81;824:88
Less than 1,500 sq. ft. 87H.00
$703.01
Per Dwelling Unit
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft. $'7.77
-88 $766.12
Per Dwelling Unit
2,500 sq. ft. or larger $868
80 8S 47.96
Per Dwelling Unit
Non - Residential
Underlined text is added; Stmek threu& text is deleted
Page 15 of 16
Packet Page -365-
12/13/2011 Item 83.
Auto Sales - Luxury $442.00
$435.81
Per 1,000 sq. ft
Auto Sales - (Now/Used) $681
-88 S671.46
Per 1,000 sq. R
Bank/Savings: Drive -In $909.0
$895.29
Per 1,000 sq. R
Bank/Savings: Walk -In 81;824:88
$1.009.65
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Business Park 8344:98
S388.48
Per 1,000 sq. R
Car Wash - Automated $641.08
$632.02
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Car Wash - Self- Service 5343.98
$239.59
Per Service Bay
Church $227.90
$223,8 2
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
College/University
7,500 students or fewer $40.08
39.44
Per Student
Greater than 7,500 students $25-08
JZZA
Per Student
Convenience Store (24 hours) S2�5i.00
$2,120.88
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Convenience Store w /Gas Pumps $1,733.00
$1,708.73
Per Fuel Position
Day Care 520.08
19.72
Per Student
Furniture Store S96.0
12LL5
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Gasoline/Service Station 5489
-88 S777,95
Per Fuel Position
Golf Course $7,743-08
$7,634.5
Per 18 Holes
Home Improvement Store $709.00
$699.97
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hospital $617.88
$608.36
Per 1,000 sq, ft.
Hotel $295.98
S290.87
Per Room
Underlined text is added; Stmek threu& text is deleted
Page 15 of 16
Packet Page -365-
12/13/2011 Item 83.
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Impact Fee Land Use Category Rate
Industrial - General Light $27500
2� 71.15
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Marina $4.08
121M
Per Berth
Mini - Warehouse $28.98
122,0
Per 1,000 sq. R
Motel 5275.99
$271.15
Per Room
Movie Theater $2,382.0
$2,348.65
Per Screen
Nursing Home 5287
-99 S282.98
Per Bed
Office 50,000 sq. ft. or less 5366.00
$558.07
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 50,001 - 100,000 sq. R $482.09
5475.25
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 100,001- 200,000 sq. ft. $419:09
$404.26
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 200,001- 400,000 sq. R $339,09
S345.10
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office Greater than 400,000 sq. R SM9.0
S314,53
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office - Medical $686.00
S675,41
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Pharmacy/Drug Store $764:09
$758.23
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Quick Lube 5462:99
$4455.53
Per Service Bay
Restaurant - Fast Food w/Drive -In $3,389.89
$33,538.75
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Restaurant - High Turnover $188.88
S106.48
Per Seat
Restaurant - Quality $89.9
$86.76
Per Seat
Retail 50,000 Sq. Ft. 'or Less $976.09
S962.33
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 50,001 - 100,000 Sq. Ft. $988-00
$966.28
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 100,001- 150,000 Sq. Ft. $996.09
$883,45
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 150,001- 200,000 Sq. Ft. 51;09400
$1.079.67
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 200,001400,000 Sq. Ft. $932.00
$918.95
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 400,001-600,000 Sq, Ft. $972:00
S958.39
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 600,001- 1,000,000 Sq. Ft, 5964-00
S950,50
Per 1,000 sq. R
Retail >1,000,000 Sq. Ft. $832.00
$820.35
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail - Specialty $672:00
$663.57
Per 1,000 sq. R
RV Park $2;3-08
S211,99
Per Site
School - Elementary (Private) W4
9 $23.66
Per Student
School - Middle (Private) $2908
S27.60
Per Student
School - High School (Private) $32.90
$31.55
Per Student
Supermarket $816:88
S804.57
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Tire Store $53400
$526.5 2
Per Service Bay
Underlined text is added; Stw thFovo text is deleted
Page 16 of 16
Packet Page -366-
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Attachment A
Collier County Impact Fee Indexing — 2011
Collier County has used impact fees as a funding source for growth- related capital improvements
for various facilities since 1978. The most recently adopted impact fee is the Law Enforcement
Impact Fee which was adopted by the Board in 2005. In October of 2002, the Board directed
that during the upcoming required three -year updates of the individual impact fees that
methodology also be developed to provide for the annual indexing of the fees in the years
between the formal updates.
On February 28, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners directed that the indexing
methodology for each of the impact fees be reviewed and revised, as appropriate, to reflect
localized information and develop a legally defensible indexing program, specific to Collier
County. The "Collier County Impact Fee Indexing Study," identified four measures (land costs,
building costs, building equipment costs and transportation costs) to be used, alone or in
combination, to calculate the annual index for each of Collier County's impact fees. The
methodology then used the calculated indexes over a 10 year period fitted with a linear
regression analysis. This method had an overall smoothing effect on the index and therefore the
index was slower to increase in years of escalating costs and slower to decrease in years that
costs were declining. The study was presented to the Board of County Commissioners on May
22, 2007 for their review, consideration and direction. The Board accepted the findings of the
report and the "Collier County Impact Fee Indexing Study" and associated rate schedules were
adopted by the Board on June 26, 2007 via Ordinance No 2007 -57 with a delayed effective date
of January 1, 2008.
At the October 15, 2008 meeting, the Productivity Committee unanimously approved the
following recommendation relative to the proposed impact fee indexing:
"That the Board of County Commissioners defer a decision on impact fee adjustments as
proposed until such time the methodology can be reassessed. "
This request was due in part to the desire of the Productivity Committee to consider the
appropriateness of an indexing model that is more sensitive to the current economic conditions.
On October 28, 2008 at the regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, under the
Communications Section of the Agenda, the Board directed that the Productivity Committee be
afforded the opportunity to review the indexing methodology and that the County's impact fee
consultants, Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. (TOA) would assist with the review.
Packet Page -367-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
On February 18, 2009, the Productivity Committee reviewed the materials prepared and
presented by the impact fee consultant and unanimously recommended that the methodology for
annual indexing should be revised from the use of regression analysis to the use of the average
cost change over a two year period, as this method is intended to be more responsive to cost
fluctuations. The Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance 2009 -17 on April 28,
2009, which amended the Code to reflect the use of a two -year average to calculate the various
indices, as recommended.
In 2011 Community Parks, Regional Parks, Library, Road, EMS, Jail, Dependent Fire,
Government Buildings and Law Enforcement Impact Fees are scheduled to be indexed using the
adopted (2 -year average) methodology. Additionally, the School Impact Fee Index has been
calculated for comparison to the full rates and currently adopted rates.
The attached report from Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. provides the details of the indexing
calculations.
Packet Page -368-
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Collier County
Indexing Update Calculations
FINAL REPORT
November 21, 2011
Prepared for:
Collier County
3299 Tamiami Trail East, St 303
Naples, Florida 34112
ph (239) 252 -8097
fax (239) 252 -3602
Prepared by:
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
1000 N. Ashley Drive, #100
Tampa, Florida 33602
ph (813) 224 -8862
fax (813) 226 -2106
E -mail: nkamp @tindaleoliver.com
073092 -00.11
Packet Page -369-
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
COLLIER COUNTY
INDEXING UPDATE CALCULATIONS
Table of Contents
I. Introduction ................................................................ ............................... 1
II. Calculation of Indices ................................................. ............................... 2
III. Application .................................................................. ............................... 4
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
November 2011 1 Indexing Update
Packet Page -370-
11
�
n
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
I. Introduction
Collier County retained Tindale- Oliver & Associates (TOA) to calculate the updated
indices for the following program areas:
• Correctional Facilities;
• Community Parks;
• Regional Parks;
• Libraries;
• Government Buildings;
• Fire;
• Emergency Medical Services (EMS);
• Law Enforcement;
• Schools; and
• Transportation
The update to the Collier County Water Sewer District ( CCWSD) Impact Fees was
approved February 22, 2011, with an effective date of March 1, 2011. Based on the
information provided by the County, the CCWSD Impact Fees and the user fees will be
re- evaluated within this fiscal year with updated Master Plans, including the most up to
date Capital Improvement Plans. As such, said fees will reflect the most recent local and
regional economic data and will represent most accurate figures possible.
This technical report provides a summary of the updated indices and the calculations of
combined indices for the program areas listed above.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
November 2011 1 Indexing Update k
Packet Page -371-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
11. Calculation of Indices
As part of the calculations, the following indices were updated:
• Collier County Property Values;
• Consumer Price Index (CPI);
• Producer Price Index (PPI) (for equipment and highway construction separately);
• Engineering Building News (ENR) Record Building Cost Index;
• Turner Building Cost Index;
• RS Means Building Cost Index; and
• Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Average Roadway Construction
Cost
The following table presents the updated indices and a comparison to 2010 indices. It
should be noted that 2011 indices were calculated based on the latest two years of data
available. More specifically, in the case of building cost index, ENR and RS Means were
based on 2010 and 2011 data, while Turner Building Cost was based on 2009 and 2010
data. In the case of equipment /vehicle cost index, the latest full years available for both
the PPI and CPI were 2009 and 2010. In the case of roadway construction, PPI for
Highways is based on 2009 and 2010 data while FDOT data is based on 2010 and 2011.
Finally, the land index is based on 2010 and 2011 data.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
November 2011 2 Indexing Update
Packet Page -372-
ll
W
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Table 1
2011 Index Calculations
(1) Calculated based on the data from the latest two years available.
(2) Calculated using 2008 and 2009 data, except for the land value component,
which was calculated using 2009 and 2010 data.
(3) 2010 Index (Item 2) subtracted from 2011 Index (Item 1)
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2011
Packet Page -373-
Collier County
Indexing Update
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
III. Application
Updated individual indices from Table 1 are used to calculate combined indices for each
of the ten program areas, which are shown in Table 2. Total applicable indices
represent the adjustment factor that should be applied to the each fee schedule.
Table 2
2011 Combined Indices
Inventory Component
Community Parks:
Land
Distribution of
$76,028,000
Percent of
Total
47.1%
2011
-10.2%
Combined
-4.8%
Site Improvements
$3,801,400
2.4%
-0.6%
0.0%
Facilities /Equipment
81 608 582
50.5%
-0.6%
-0.3%
Total Cost
$161,437,982
100.0%
Total Applicable index(')
-5.1%
Regional
Land
$390,953,200
86.8%
-10.2%
-8.9%
Site Improvements
$35,541,200
7.9%
-0.6%
0.0%
Facilities /Equipment
23 782 137
5.3%
-0.6%
0.0%
Total Cost
$450,276,537
100.0%
Total Applicable Index("
-8.9%
Ochonee:
Vehicles /Equipment
1,666,000
100.0%
0.5%
0.5%
Total Cost
$1,666,000
100.0%
Total Applicable Index(s)
0.5%
Isles of Capri:
Vehicles /Equipment
$1,182,700
100.0%
0.5%
0.5%
Total Cost
$1,182,700
100.0%
Total Applicable Index (5)
0.5%
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
November 2011 4 Indexing Update
Packet Page -374-
9
11�
NO
11�
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Table 2
2011 Combined Indices (Continued)
Inventory Component
Land
Distribution of
$4,334,000
Percent of
Total
15.9%
2011
-10.2%
Combined
-1.6%
Buildin s
$9,538,661
35.1%
-0.6%
-0.2%
Vehicles /Equipment
13 314 780
49.0%
0.5%
0.2%
Total Cost
$27,187,441
100.0%
Total Applicable Index(s)
-1.6%
Law Enforcement.
Land
$4,656,300
4.9%
-10.2%
-0.5%
Buildings
$39,427,219
41.9%
-0.6%
-0.3%
Vehicles /Equipment
50 146 702
53.2%
0.5%
0.3%
Total Cost
$94,230,221
100.0%
Total Applicable Index(s)
-0.5%
Correctional Facilities:
Land
$638,000
0.9%
-10.2%
-0.1%
Buildings
$68,584,713
93.0%
-0.6%
-0.6%
Equipment
JIAL3,620
6.1%
0.5%
0.0%
Total Cost
$73,706,333
100.0%
Total Applicable Index(s)
-0.7%
Land
$1,755,750
3.5%
-10.2%
-0.4%
Buildings
$29,643,529
58.5%
-0.6%
-0.4%
Materials /Equipment
L2,256,955
38.0%
0.5%
0.2%
Total Cost
$50,656,234
100.0%
Total Applicable Index(s)
-0.6%
Government Buildings:
Land
$14,892,800
7.9%
-10.2%
-0.8%
Buildings
$172,439 564
92.1%
-0.6%
-0.6%
Total Cost
$187,332,364
100.0%
Total Applicable Index(s)
-1.4%
Tindale - Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2011
5
Packet Page -375-
Collier County
Indexing Update
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Table 2
2011 Combined Indices (Continued)
Component
Schools:
Land
Distribution of
$118,267,500
Percent
Total
7.3%
-10.2%
-0.7%
Buildings
$1,305,384,656
80.6%
-0.6%
-0.5%
Buses/Vehicles /Equipment
$196,398,174
12.1%
0.5%
0.1%
Total Cost
$1,620,050,330
100.0%
Total Applicable Index(s)
-1.1%
Transportation:
Design, CEI, Mitigation, Construction,
Interchange, Carrying
$2,969,418
76.7%
-5.3%
-4.1%
ROW (Land Cost)
$675,750
17.5%
-10.2%
-1.8%
ROW (Administrative Cost)
225,250.
5.8%
-5.3%
-0.3%
Total Cost
$3,870,418
100.0%
Total Applicable Index(s)
1
1
-6.2%
(1) Source: Impact Fee Technical Studies
(2) Each inventory component is divided by the total inventory value
(3) Source: Table 1
(4) Percent of the inventory (Item 2) multiplied by 2011 Index (Item 3)
(5) Sum of indices for each component
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
November 2011
Packet Page -376-
Collier County
Indexing Update
/�
n
COLLIER COUNTY
INDEXING METHODOLOGY STUDY
FINAL REPORT
Co*er County
March 11, 2009
Prepared for:
Collier County
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Ph (239) 252 -8999
Prepared by:
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
1000 N. Ashley Dr., #100
Tampa, Florida, 33602
ph (813) 224 -8862, fax (813) 226 -2106
073037 -02.08
Packet Page -377-
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Table of Contents
ExecutiveSummary ................................ ...............................
Introduction........................................... ...............................
Evaluation of Current Index Composition ......................
IndexingMethodology Evaluation .......................................... ...............................
Summaryand Conclusions ...................................................... ...............................
List of Appendices:
Appendix A — Indexing Methods Used by Other Jurisdictions
1
2
2
4
18
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 i Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -378-
n
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Executive Summary
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) was retained by Collier County to prepare a
review of the adopted indexing methodology. The current adopted localized indexing
methodology uses trend data and regression analysis, which moderate the changes in the
index, and the effect of the index on the final impact fee schedules. When costs are
increasing, the indexing methodology does not allow the index to increase as rapidly as
actual cost changes occur. Similarly, when costs are decreasing, the index lags the actual
reductions in costs. Given the current decrease in costs, Collier County is interested in a
study that would review the current process and explore potential changes to the current
methodology.
This Executive Summary provides a summary of the three primary findings:
1. The current adopted methodology adjusts national, regional or statewide figures
to local figures using wage rates to reflect local costs. The analysis found that
although this adjustment is useful in capturing some of the difference between
local and non -local costs, it does not have a significant impact on the final indices.
As such, it is recommended that the County continue to adjust national, regional,
and statewide figures to local costs.
2. The current adopted methodology uses regression analysis. Regression analysis
tends to work well in smoothing changes over time when there are no significant
fluctuations in the underlying data. The indices for seven of Collier County's ten
impact fee program areas are based on relatively stable national or regional data.
However, indices for the other program areas (transportation, regional parks, and
community parks) are based on the change in land values and transportation
construction costs, which fluctuated significantly over the past several years.
When costs fluctuate heavily, the regression analysis reacts with a lag.
3. Given the above described findings, it is recommended that the County use two -
year average data of locally adjusted indices for all program areas. This approach
will result in indices that are much more reactive to the changes in cost.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
March 2009
Packet Page -379-
Collier County
Indexing Methodology Study
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Introduction
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) was retained by Collier County to prepare a
review of the adopted indexing methodology. In the early 2000s, Collier County started
to index its impact fees. Historically, the County used national indices for most of the
variables. However, over the past few years, there were concerns that national indices
failed to represent the significant cost increases experienced in Collier County. As a
result, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) requested a localized
indexing study to better measure the increase in local infrastructure costs. TOA
completed the localized indexing study in 2007, which was then adopted by the BOCC,
and the initial set of new indices became effective in January of 2008.
Since then, costs have started to stabilize, and in some cases, to decrease. The localized
indexing methodology uses trend data and regression analysis, which moderate the
changes in the index. When costs are increasing, the indexing methodology does not
allow the index to increase as rapidly as actual cost changes may occur. Similarly, when
costs are decreasing, the index lags the actual reductions in costs. Given this, Collier
County is interested in a study that would review the current process and explore
potential changes to the current methodology.
This summary report is organized in the following manner:
• Evaluation of Current Index Composition
• Indexing Methodology Evaluation
• Summary and Conclusions
In addition, Appendix A presents a summary of indexing methods used by other
jurisdictions.
Evaluation of Current Index Composition
The adopted indexing methodology relies on several indices. Some of these indices
reflect national data that were adjusted to local cost levels through the use of labor wage
rate comparison. Table 1 provides a summary of each index and its scope. As presented,
three of the indices (Engineering News Record (ENR), Producer Price Index (PPI), and
Turner Building Cost) provide national level data while Consumer Price Index (CPI) and
RS Means provide regional data (such as the Miami -Fort Lauderdale area, or the City of
Miami, etc.), and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) provides state data.
Finally, land values are provided at the local level.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 2 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -380-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Table 1
Indices and Associated Data Sources
'. ;Tui act FeeYat�orial
statewide
Re ` "oi7alr ,
.'Total t
Libraries
60%
0%
27%
13%
100%
EMS
34%
0%
33%
33%
100%
Fire Rescue
0%
0%
100%
0%
100%
Gov't Buildings
89%
0%
0%
11%
100%
Law Enforcement
43%
0%
47%
10%
100%
Correctional
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
Parks (Regional)
7%
0%
0%
93%
100%
Parks (Community)
38%
0%
0%
62%
100%
Schools
79%
0%
9%
12%
100%
Transportation
0%
79%
0%1
21%1
100%
Source: Collier County Indexing Study by Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. in association
with Center for Urban Policy Research, June 11, 2007 and Collier County Impact Fee Studies
Table 1 also presents the distribution of local, state, regional, and national data for the
indices calculated for each impact fee program area. Based on the distribution of the
inventory among land, buildings, equipment, and transportation costs, each impact fee is
influenced differently by national, state, regional, or local data. As shown, the parks
impact fee indices are affected mostly by local indices (land values); the fire rescue index
is affected solely by regional data while the correctional facilities index is determined
solely by national data; the transportation index is heavily determined by statewide data,
while libraries, government buildings, and school impact fee indices are affected
primarily by national data. The EMS impact fee index is influenced equally by all levels
of data, and the law enforcement index is influenced mostly by national and regional
data.
This relation, in turn, determines the potential level of fluctuations. Historically, national
and regional data have been more stable than state or local data. As such, indices that
rely more heavily on national data do not fluctuate as much. Conversely, those that rely
heavily on state and/or local data tend to fluctuate more.
As mentioned previously, under the adopted methodology, national, regional and state
indices are adjusted to local area cost levels. The next section of this report provides
more detailed information on this adjustment process.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
March 2009
Packet Page -381-
Collier County
Indexing Methodology Study
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Indexing Methodology Evaluation
As mentioned previously, historically, Collier County calculated its indices based on
straight averages and unadjusted national, regional and state figures. The adopted
methodology revised the original approach by adding two components:
• Adjustment of national, regional, and statewide figures to local costs; and
• Utilization of regression analysis to smooth the fluctuations.
In addition, multiple indices were used for each component of the inventory (buildings,
equipment, transprtaton, etc.), with the exception of land. This section reviews the
impact of these revisions on the responsiveness of indices to annual fluctuations in cost.
Adjustment to Local Costs
The adopted indexing method adjusts national, regional and statewide figures to local
costs through a comparison of change in labor rates in a given geographic area (state,
nation, etc.) to South Florida (Collier and Palm Beach Counties). Table 2 provides a
comparison of unadjusted and adjusted indices. In addition, as mentioned previously,
under the adopted methodology multiple indices are used for various components of the
inventory (buildings, equipment, etc.).
For the five -year period shown in Table 2, the original methodology that relied on
unadjusted national variables results consistently in a lower index, with the exception of
transportation. The transportation index decreased when adjusted because the addition of
the Producer Price Index (PPI) for Highway and Street Construction moderated the
impact of statewide cost increases.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 4 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -382-
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Cn
=r
E .o
F" CD�
Q 0
r-
w
o
CD
-fie
V] (D
pr
to O O
A'
�CD
C
^
v
n
O 'L3 O
CD
.>
�
aC A7
UQ
CD
CD
^S z
O
p
0 6 X
-
CD
o � �
O
CD
.
O
C�
CD
C
. p CL
CD
(i A�
CD
D
0
o
Co
.-.
0
0
CD
�o
Co
0
a
a
X�r
O (D
CD
az
CD
C�
CD
G.
fl- O
O O
O
O cD
� O
CD C
OCD
C �
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Packet Page -383-
C
CL
M
CL
CL
y
N
C
N
CL
0
c�
N
D
N
CL
0
0
0
w
O
0
rqL
O
a
y'
0
h
a
c�
su
Cr
M
N
N*-/
V
Cn
1
�v
C)
o
r-
w
o
?Mr
pr
I;D
,
UQ
p
O
CD
O
� �
0
o
Co
.-.
0
0
0
�o
Co
0
o
a
X�r
k
t
ef!P =n
�C
w
N
60
O
O
W
v
J
A
N
J�-
-
Vi
W
4�-
N
J
4�-
gg
$
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
ON
.P
C!e
C�
w
00
01
a
4
Oo
Oo
�1
�C
Ij
IC
OV
�o
ug
wb�oc�w�,n�pwv;�
O
A
4�,
W
--A
-P,
>����c
�bo
a,
t�
��C',o00
v,
cn
v�
a�
�
o�a,
o0
0,
1 a.;
0000�00000
O
A
O
w
to
w
p
i h
4-
Q1
W
W
-11
N
-p�
Go
90
lz�
a:
O
Co
t!i
w
.P
�o
to
br,
a1
411
Oo
CN
C' .
Packet Page -383-
C
CL
M
CL
CL
y
N
C
N
CL
0
c�
N
D
N
CL
0
0
0
w
O
0
rqL
O
a
y'
0
h
a
c�
su
Cr
M
N
N*-/
V
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
The adjusted indices tend to capture the higher cost increases experienced in Collier
County and, in general, provide somewhat higher indices.
At the time of the study, the wage comparison was based on 2000 Public Use Microdata
Sample (PUMS) and 2005 American Community Survey (ACS) information. PUMS is a
component of the Census data and is only updated every 10 years. As such, an updated
version is not yet available. However, since the completion of the study, the 2007 ACS
has been published. Table 3 provides a comparison of multipliers included in the original
indexing study and updated figures using 2007 ACS data. As presented, while the
multipliers for construction costs continued to increase, the multiplier for the trucking
industry decreased. It should be noted that the recent decrease in the labor component of
construction costs is not yet reflected in the 2007 ACS figures.
Table 3
Multiplier to Convert National /State /Regional
Indices to South Florida(')
(1) Source: Collier County Indexing Study by Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. in association
with Center for Urban Policy Research, June 11, 2007
(2) Source: Center for Urban Policy Research
These multipliers apply only to the change in indices from one year to another, which
results in a moderate impact on the final indices.
Figure 1 presents the change in actual library construction costs experienced in Collier
County as well as estimated costs using unadjusted and adjusted national indices for the
local cost differential. Prior to 2002, when costs were relatively stable, unadjusted
national indices were accurate in reflecting changes in cost. However, with significant
cost increases experienced over the past few years, the original method failed to predict
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
March 2009
Packet Page -384-
Collier County
Indexing Methodology Study
111�
Nation to South Florida
ENR Index
Construction Industry
1.35
1.71
Turner Index
FDOT Urban Road
Florida to South Florida
Construction
Construction Industry
1.15
1.29
Highway and Street
Nation to South Florida
Construction (BLS)
Construction Industry
1.40
2.04
Miami to South Florida
RS Means
Construction Industry
1.90
2.04
Nation to South Florida
Public Furniture (PPI)
Trucking Industry
1.72
0.24
Miami -Ft. Lauderdale to
South Florida
CPI
Trucking Industry
2.32
0.21
(1) Source: Collier County Indexing Study by Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. in association
with Center for Urban Policy Research, June 11, 2007
(2) Source: Center for Urban Policy Research
These multipliers apply only to the change in indices from one year to another, which
results in a moderate impact on the final indices.
Figure 1 presents the change in actual library construction costs experienced in Collier
County as well as estimated costs using unadjusted and adjusted national indices for the
local cost differential. Prior to 2002, when costs were relatively stable, unadjusted
national indices were accurate in reflecting changes in cost. However, with significant
cost increases experienced over the past few years, the original method failed to predict
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
March 2009
Packet Page -384-
Collier County
Indexing Methodology Study
111�
,*-ON
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
actual costs experienced in Collier County. As presented, the adjustment for local costs
still does not capture the full cost change; however, it does bring the indices somewhat
closer to actual cost increases.
Figure 1
Comparison of Actual Library Construction Cost Changes
To Estimated Cost with Indexing
$350
$330 Sq
$310
$290
$270
$250
a.
$230
$210
$190
$170
$150
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Source: Collier County Impact Fee Studies (1999, 2002, and 2006) are used for actual cost
figures. Cost adjustment with unadjusted indices are based on indices calculated using the
historical method without adjusting for local cost. Cost increase with adjusted indices is
calculated by applying the national indices to local cost and adding more indices for each
variable. These figures reflect 10 -year averages of applicable data and do not use the regression
analysis.
Figure 2 provides a similar example for transportation costs. The difference between
national cost indices and Florida Long Range Estimates (LRE) figures for transportation
infrastructure costs are presented in this chart. This difference further shows the need to
adjust the non -local indices to obtain local area costs.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 7 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -385-
--*--Actual Cost per Ft
,� ,
Indexed Cost IOU,!
�
Cost with Adjusted Index
_
��. ���`�� �C�� �.
y ., .,f� �. c: to � ... .��,. #�.
,. 5„ � t
,.:r
�i "�� �..,.F
2S.
W
�"` .�, ,�. `�� - 4 , ",`,*'.'.nx�_
Source: Collier County Impact Fee Studies (1999, 2002, and 2006) are used for actual cost
figures. Cost adjustment with unadjusted indices are based on indices calculated using the
historical method without adjusting for local cost. Cost increase with adjusted indices is
calculated by applying the national indices to local cost and adding more indices for each
variable. These figures reflect 10 -year averages of applicable data and do not use the regression
analysis.
Figure 2 provides a similar example for transportation costs. The difference between
national cost indices and Florida Long Range Estimates (LRE) figures for transportation
infrastructure costs are presented in this chart. This difference further shows the need to
adjust the non -local indices to obtain local area costs.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 7 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -385-
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Figure 2
Comparison of Transportation Cost Changes
FDOT LRE vs. National PPI
source: rliv i Long xange Lstnmates kLxt;) ana rri ror tntgnway ana street uonstructnon
In conclusion, the adjustment of national, regional, and statewide costs to local costs has
a minimal impact on the overall index; however, this approach does result in figures more
reflective of local costs. As such, it is recommended that Collier County continue to use
this adjustment for future indices.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 8 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -386-
W
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Impact of Regression Analysis
The second adjustment made to the original method was the utilization of regression
analysis of two- or three -year rolling averages to smooth the fluctuations in cost over
time. As part of this current indexing methodology review, TOA conducted a sensitivity
analysis of the regression analysis. This analysis showed that when costs are relatively
stable, the utilization of regression analysis is beneficial in smoothing changes from one
year to another. However, when there are large fluctuations in cost, the regression
method responds with a significant lag both when cost are increasing and decreasing.
The remainder of this section provides a summary of the results of this analysis.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
March 2009
Packet Page -387-
Collier County
Indexing Methodology Study
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Historically, national and regional indices used for building and equipment/vehicle
components of the inventory have been relatively stable. These indices include ENR
Building Cost Index, Turner Building Cost Index, and RS Means Index for building cost;
and CPI and PPI for Public Furniture for equipment and vehicle cost. Figures 3 and 4
present trends in these indices along with a regression line that combines the impact of
applicable indices for building cost and equipment/vehicle costs.
Figure 3
Trends in Building Cost Indices
and Regression Analysis
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
ENR - Actual
Turner Building - Actual
RS Means - Actual
--40—Blended Regression
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Source: ENR Building Cost Index, Turner Building Cost Index, RS Means Index
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 10 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -388-
n
Figure 4
Trends in Equipment/Vehicle Cost Indices
and Regression Analysis
40.0% x MA sr
CPI Actual��
PPI - Actual
°
30.0 /o —41—Blended
20.0 ° /O
� is ����. r*�Pi,,,�.,"'� ;� x °€ ex 'ur"s' -'` € ,�ag4✓ � i .�F.��± � d# `��'i' 7- �P�*t` v .�. ( ";
r , a +
10.0 %
° Uzi
xN 111 n3nL 3d,�aa�iACq�s � '��"'` we �f x i'�''��` q � �`.�.� 3u +4'��,�►�' � � �� t �°.E
r ��"�� re$ 4r � � � i'�a' �G, 4„e I : ,! s� . ��.,�`'6'�a�"'��ra+rs i��- ✓� �7;
z t:
— 10.0 ° /O - r. _` .•x'r,
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Source: CPI and PPI for Public Furniture
As shown, utilization of regression analysis for these relatively stable indices tends to
smooth the changes in cost from one year to another and does not have a significant
impact on the index. Conversely, when there are significant fluctuations in the data, the
regression analysis tends to create a significant lag, and not react as quickly as may be
desired.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 11 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -389-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Figure 5 presents trends in LREs published by FDOT and PPI for Highway and Street
Construction. The figure plots the actual data, a two -year average of actual data,
regression excluding PPI, and a blended regression. As shown, the plot of actual LRE
figures results in a trend line that is highly sensitive to fluctuations in costs. The two -
year average of LRE figures tracks the actual changes with a minimal lag. However, the
regression analysis that uses only the LRE data reacts to the changes in cost with a
significant lag. This lag is somewhat moderated by blending LRE data with PPI data;
however, there is still a considerable lag compared to the utilization of a two -year
average.
Figure 5
FDOT LRE Trends
0
O X s r J p„,x f n w 3. rr� isi7rfr _
'WOO, M; +�,>'�s'
�r a":
- LRE -Actual
• LRE - 2 Yr Avg
30.0% f LRE - 5 Yr Regression' ' �` u�
—r-- Blended Regression
20.0 %
10.0 %� a . W—W,
`� __ > �zaku► _
0.0% rzuf
—10.0%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Source: Data from FDOT LREs and PPI for Highway and Street Construction
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 12 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -390-
rMO
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
n Figure 6 demonstrates how the adopted model would function with a cost increase of 10
percent per year over the next three years through 2012. The chart plots historical data
until 2009, and then assumes an annual cost increase of 10 percent. As presented, the
regression analysis lags in capturing the observed changes in costs.
Figure 6
Transportation Construction Cost
Comparison of Average Changes and Regression Model Results
with a 10% Annual Cost Increase from 2009 to 2012
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
-10.0%
-20.0%
-30.0%
—'0—+10% Cost Growth Rate Regression
M LRE Actual
LRE Growth - 2 Yr Avg
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Data from FDOT LREs and PPI for Highway and Street Construction for years 2005
through 2008, assumed 10 percent annual increase as of 2009
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 13 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -391-
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Similarly, Figure 7 presents how the current adopted model would function with a cost
decrease of 10 percent per year over the next three years, through 2012. Again, the
regression analysis lags in capturing the observed changes in costs.
Figure 7
Transportation Construction Cost
Comparison of Average Changes and Regression Model Results
with a 10% Annual Cost Decrease from 2009 to 2012
Source: Data from FDOT LREs and PPI for Highway and Street Construction for years 2005
through 2008, assumed 10 percent annual decrease as of 2009
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc.
March 2009 14
Packet Page -392-
Collier County
Indexing Methodology Study
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
In addition to transportation costs, land values also experienced significant fluctuations
over the past few years. Figure 8 presents the actual annual changes, 2- and 3 -year
averages, and the regression results for land values over the past eight years. As
presented, actual changes are somewhat moderated by the two -year averages, and even
more so with the utilization of three -year averages. The regression analysis, on the other
hand, reacts to actual changes with a significant lag.
Figure 8
Land Value Trends
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
-10.0%
Actual
2 -Yr Average
*'—Regression
—a°--- 3 -Yr Average
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Source: Countywide land value is from Collier County Property Appraiser
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 15 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -393-
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Figure 9 demonstrates actual cost changes from 2005 to 2009, and how the adopted
model would function with a cost increase of 10 percent per year over the next three
years, through 2012. The chart plots historical data until 2009, and then assumes an
annual cost increase of 10 percent. Similar to the results shown for transportation costs,
the regression analysis of land values lags in capturing the observed changes in costs.
The two -year average, on the other hand, follows the actual changes closely.
Figure 9
Land Values
Comparison of Average Changes and Regression Model Results
with a 10% Annual Cost Increase from 2009 to 2012
Source: Countywide land values are from Collier County Property Appraiser for years 2005
through 2008, and assumed 10 percent annual increase as of 2009
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 16 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -394-
�'�s K a34 v-r `Y�'F't1 Ufi�t.� -5-'
�k
30.0%
a e r lr. aea ry
20.0 ° /O
t =^s
3 v -
10.0%
0.0%
au
k^
- 10.0%
k
a
` --@—Regression
- 20.0 %`';'
M Land Growth - Actual
ski °u vpa
j
Land Growth - 2 Yr Avgt�
- 30.0 %Ecs
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Countywide land values are from Collier County Property Appraiser for years 2005
through 2008, and assumed 10 percent annual increase as of 2009
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 16 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -394-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Similarly, Figure 10 presents actual cost changes from 2005 to 2009, and how the current
adopted model would predict land values with a cost decrease of 10 percent per year over
the next three years, through 2012. Again, the regression analysis lags in capturing the
observed changes in costs.
Figure 10
Land Values
Comparison of Average Changes and Regression Model Results
with a 10% Annual Cost Decrease from 2009 to 2012
30.0%
20.0% p
t"v"„&N
10.0 /o
°
0.0% 4 ��s► u� ��� aw 3
—10.0%
t; --O--Regression�
-20.0% x ; M Land Growth - Actual
Land Growth 2 Yr Avg
- 30.0%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Countywide land values are from Collier County Property Appraiser for years 2005
through 2008, and assumed 10 percent annual decrease as of 2009
In summary, regression analysis tends to smooth fluctuations over time, which causes it
to lag in responding large fluctuations. For the majority of the Collier County impact
fees, the utilization of regression analysis does not have a significant impact. These are
the impact fees that utilize relatively stable national or regional data in the calculation of
their indices, and include the following:
• Libraries
• Fire Rescue
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 17 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -395-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
• EMS
• Government Buildings
• Schools
• Law Enforcement
• Correctional Facilities
In contrast, indices for parks and transportation impact fees rely heavily on statewide and
local data, which tend to fluctuate significantly. In these cases, the regression analysis
responds with a lag.
Summary and Conclusions
A review of the adopted indexing model resulted in the following conclusions and
recommendations:
• There has been a definite difference between national cost increases and cost
increases experienced in Collier County. As such, it is important to incorporate a
local adjustment factor in indexing calculations.
• The use of regression method tends to smooth out the differences from one year to
another, and seems to work well during relatively stable periods. However, it
does not respond quickly to large increases or decreases in costs.
• Some of the policy options the County should evaluate include the following:
1. The County may decide to use the regression method during periods when
costs are increasing and use averages when costs are decreasing. This option
would result in revenue loss for the County since the regression model slows
down the increase in indices, while using averages responds more quickly to
cost decreases.
2. The County may decide to use two- or three -year rolling averages, which
somewhat smoothes out the impact, but is much more reactive to large
fluctuations. If this is the case, it is recommended that the County continues
to adjust the national, regional, and state indices for local cost.
3. Seemingly, the best option is to start using a two -year average method and not
use the regression analysis as a means to stabilize costs from one year to
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 18 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -396-
n
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
another until the variation in costs over the last few years dissipates. It is also
recommended that the County uses this approach not only during the periods
when costs are decreasing, but also when costs are increasing.
4. Currently, the County caps the increase in individual indices at 15 percent
unless additional analysis is conducted to verify the actual increase. It is
recommended that the same 15 percent cap should be used when costs are
decreasing (i.e., if the changes is greater than -15 percent, the decrease should
be capped at 15 percent).
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 19 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -397-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
APPENDIX A
Indexing Methods Used
By Other Jurisdictions
Packet Page -398-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Methods Used by Other Jurisdictions
As part of the methodology analysis, TOA contacted all Florida counties to understand
whether they index their impact fees and, if so, which methods they use. The following
bullets summarize the results of this survey.
• Of the 67 Florida counties, 50 have implemented impact fees in at least one
service area.
• Currently, of the 50 counties, 6 have placed a moratorium on impact fee
collections due to current economic conditions.
• Of the 50 counties, 20 counties index their impact fees in at least one program
area. It is our understanding that none of these counties use a regression model or
adjust the national indices for local cost.
• The majority of the counties base their index on the following indices without
adjusting for local cost:
• ENR Construction Cost Index;
• FDOT Cost Trends;
• Consumer Price Index;
• Land values
• Florida Department of Education Student Stations Cost Factor Report
A list of counties with impact fees is included in Table A -1. The list also indicates
whether they index their fees and whether they have implemented a moratorium on
impact fees.
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 A -1 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -399-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Table A -1
Florida Counties with Indexing
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 A -2 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -400-
n
". � �
Alachua
Y
N
Baker
N
N
Bay
N
N
Bradford
Y
Y
Brevard
N
N
Broward
Y
N
Charlotte
Y
N
Citrus
N
N
Clay
N
N
Collier
Y
N
Columbia
N
N
De Soto
N
N
Dixie
N
N
Escambia
N
N
Fla ler
Y
N
Gilchrist
N
N
Glades
Y
Y
Gulf
Y
Y
Hardee
N
N
Hendry
Y
Y
Hernando
N
N
Highlands
Y
N
Hillsborough
N
N
Indian River
N
N
Jefferson
N
N
Lafayette
N
N
Lake
N
N
Lee
N
N
Levy
N
N
Manatee
Y
N
Marion
N
N
Martin
N
N
Miami -Dade
Y
N
Monroe
N
N
Nassau
N
Y
Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 A -2 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -400-
n
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Table A -1 (continued)
Florida Counties with Indexing
ui�0,
5
fora . um
Okeechobee
N
N
Orange
Y
N
Osceola
Y
N
Palm Beach
Y
N
Pasco
Y
N
Pinellas
Y
N
Polk
Y
N
Putnam
N
N
Santa Rosa
N
N
Seminole
N
N
St. Lucie
Y
N
Sumter
N
N
Volusia
Y
N
Wakulla
N
Y
Washington
N
N
Source: County representatives and Municode
Tindale - Oliver & Associates, Inc. Collier County
March 2009 A -3 Indexing Methodology Study
Packet Page -401-
12/13/2011 Item 8.B.
Attachment B
Adopted Studies /Impact Fee changes for 2010/2011 �
Road (Phase I) - Road Impact Fees were scheduled for standard indexing in 2010, however, because of the
notable cost decreases recently experienced throughout Florida, staff and the County's impact fee consultant,
Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc., agreed that it was appropriate to undertake a further review of the cost and
credit components of the Road Impact Fee by way of a "Cost and Credit Update." This study resulted in an
average reduction of 32 %. (Effective: 10/8/2010)
School Reduction - 50% reduction of all categories based on School Board recommendation. (Effective
10/8/2010). Study adopted 10/11/2011. Lower impact fees remain in place at recommendation of School
Board and BCC direction.
Community Parks Indexing — 3.4% reduction to all categories. (Effective 10/8/2010)
Regional Parks Indexine —11.9% reduction to all categories. (Effective 10/8/2010)
EMS Impact Fee Update Study — 25% average reduction for residential land uses and 32% average reduction
for commercial land uses. (Effective 11 /1 /10)
Dependent Fire (Isles of Capri and Ochopee) Impact Fee Update Study - downward adjustments to the
residential and non - residential Fire Impact Fee rates for Isles of Capri Fire Control and Rescue District and a n
downward adjustment to the residential Fire Impact Fee rate and an increase to the non - residential Fire Impact
Fee rate for the Ochopee Fire Control and Rescue District. (Effective 1/24/11)
Library Impact Fee Update Study- As a result of decreasing land and construction costs, library impact fees
have been reduced between 44% and 62 %, depending on the land use category. The library impact fee is
assessed only on residential construction. (Effective: 12/20/10)
General Government Buildings Impact Fee Update Study - decreased an average of 17% for residential land
uses and 25% for commercial land uses. (Effective: 12/20/10)
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Update Study - a three -year phased implementation for the updated rates. This
phased schedule provides a reduction for all land use categories in year one ( -25% residential and -33%
commercial).
Water and Sewer Impact Fees have been reduced as follows: Water Impact Fees reduced by 10.3% ($370)
per Equivalent Residential Connection (ERC) and Sewer Impact Fees reduced by 7.9% ($275) per ERC. This is
a total reduction of 9.1% ($645) per ERC. (Effective 3/1/2011)
Road Impact Fees (Phase II): Road Impact Fees have been reduced by an additional 10 %, on average, with the
removal of the utility relocate component. This brings the total (Phase I and 1I) to an average reduction of 42 %.
(Effective 3/1/2011)
Packet Page -402-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
ATTACHMENT C
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES (SCHOOL) IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE COMPARISON
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Full Rate
Indexed Rate
Mobile Home/RV Park
$5,712.00
$5,649.16
Multi- Family
$2,492.00
$2,464.58
Single Family Detached House
Less than 1,500 sq. ft.
$7,936.00
$7,848.70
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft.
$8,680.00
$8,584.52
2,500 sq. ft. or larger
$9,672.00
$9,565.60
Packet Page -403-
Current Rate
$3,343.69 Per Unit/Site
$1,671.84 Per Dwelling Unit
$4,806.41
Per Dwelling Unit
$5,377.70
Per Dwelling Unit
$5,851.45
Per Dwelling Unit
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
ATTACHMENT D
LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPACT FEE RATE COMPARISONS
Impact Fee Land Use Category Full Rate Indexed Rate Phase 11 Rate
Residential
Assisted Living Facility
$192.19
$191.23
$153.75
Per Dwelling Unit
Mobile Home
$3.19.59
$317.99
$255.67
Per Dwelling Unit/Site
Multi - Family
$241.85
$240.64
$193.48
Per Dwelling Unit
Single Family
Less than 1,500 sq. ft.
$412.45
$410.39
$329.96
Per Dwelling Unit
1,500 to 2,499 sq. ft.
$449.16
$446.91
$359.33
Per Dwelling Unit
2,500 sq. ft. or larger
$496.66
$494.18
$397.33
Per Dwelling Unit
Non - Residential
Auto Sales (Luxury)
$239.69
$238.49
$191.75
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Auto Sales (New/Used)
$369.26
$367.41
$295.41
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Bank/Savings: Drive -In
$492.34
$489.88
$393.87
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Bank/Savings: Walk -In
$554.97
$552.20
$443.98
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Business Park
$213.78
$212.71
$171.02
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Car Wash - Automated
$347.66
$345.92
$278.13
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Car Wash - Self- Service
$131.72
$131.06
$105.38
Per Service Bay
Church
$123.09
$122.47
$98.47
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
College/University
7,500 students or fewer
$21.59
$21.48
$17.27
Per Student
Greater than 7,500 students
$15.12
$15.04
$12.10
Per Student
Convenience Store (24 hours)
$1,181.19
$1,175.28
$944.95
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Convenience Store with Gas pumps
$939.34
$934.64
$751.47
Per Fuel Position
Day Care
$10.80
$10.75
$8.64
Per Student
Furniture Store
$51.83
$51.57
$41.46
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Gasoline/Service Station
$427.56
$425.42
$342.05
Per Fuel Position
Golf Course
$4,197.87
$4,176.88
$3,358.30
Per 18 Holes
Home Improvement Store
$384.37
$382.45
$307.50
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hospital
$334.71
$333.04
$267.77
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Hotel
$159.80
$159.00
$127.84
Per Room
Packet Page -404-
/-111,
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Impact Fee Land Use Category
Industrial - General Light
$149.00
$148.26
$119.20
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Marina
$41.03
$40.82
$32.82
Per Berth
Mini - Warehouse
$15.12
$15.04
$12.10
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Motel
$149.00
$148.26
$119.20
Per Room
Movie Theater
$1,291.32
$1,284.86
$1,033.06
Per Screen
Nursing Home
$155.48
$154.70
$124.38
Per Bed
Office 50,000 sq. ft. or less
$306.63
$305.10
$245.30
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 50,001- 100,000 sq. ft.
$261.29
$259.98
$209.03
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 100,001- 200,000 sq. ft.
$222.42
$221.31
$177.94
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office 200,001400,000 sq. ft.
$190.03
$189.08
$152.02
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office Greater than 400,000 sq. ft.
$172.75
$171.89
$138.20
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Office - Medical
$371.42
$369.56
$297.14
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Pharmacy/Drug Store
$416.76
$414.68
$333.41
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Quick Lube
$250.49
$249.24
$200.39
Per Service Bay
Restaurant - Fast Food w/Drive -In
$1,945.62
$1,935.89
$1,556.50
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Restaurant - High Turnover
$58.30
$58.01
$46.64
Per Seat
Restaurant - Quality
$47.51
$47.27
$38.01
Per Seat
Retail 50,000 Sq. Ft. or Less
$529.05
$526.40
$423.24
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 50,001- 100,000 Sq. Ft.
$531.21
$528.55
$424.97
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 100,001- 150,000 Sq. Ft.
$485.87
$483.44
$388.70
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 150,001- 200,000 Sq. Ft.
$593.84
$590.87
$475.07
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 200,001- 400,000 Sq. Ft.
$505.30
$502.77
$404.24
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 400,001- 600,000 Sq. Ft.
$526.89
$524.26
$421.51
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail 600,001- 1,000,000 Sq. Ft.
$522.57
$519.96
$418.06
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail >1,000,000 Sq. Ft.
$451.31
$449.05
$361.05
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Retail - Specialty
$364.94
$363.12
$291.95
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
RV Park
$116.61
$116.03
$93.29
Per Site
School - Elementary (Private)
$12.96
$12.90
$10.37
Per Student
School - Middle (Private)
$15.12
$15.04
$12.10
Per Student
School - High School (Private)
$17.28
$17.19
$13.82
Per Student
Supermarket
$442.68
$440.47
$354.14
Per 1,000 sq. ft.
Tire Store
$289.36
$287.91
$231.49
Per Service Bay
Packet Page -405-
Attachment E
Impact Fee Comparisons
Single - Family
Office
Retail
Packet Page -406-
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
Packet Page -407-
N
O N
O O
A
c)O
c
D
M Z
O < O
O c
z
C) O
M N D
D n
Z T
0 m
M N
2 X
O Z
O
m
z
D
O
K
O
n
m
p
M
r
M
N
0
n
M
m
0
O
D
r
Z
p
z
C
Z
<
--
D
N
z
n
Z
D
w
M
M
n
0
M
0
K
o
D
2
M
c
N
S
z
T
o
N
m
z
N
N
w
w
iJ�
iJ�
iJt
{J1
t ry
M
Ln
N
N
C
w
U.)
LO
uj
v
o
0
o
°
Co
�
°'
m
w
v
N
�
00
Ln
o
c
u'
o°
N
w
w
w
c�'
�
O
M
�
w
�
�*
w
-'
o
00
Ln
o)
co
V
W
�
�-►
�
F.a
O
00
l0
0)
'p
Ln
V
N
to
O
N
W
N
V
N
O
I-A
O
W
W
i-�
Ln
00
O
O
W
N
V
Vl7
W
C
O
000
000
Q
V
O
can
w
ti}
w
tr0-
N
*
a+
0
0
0
�,,
�
�-'
N
00
0
00
rn
m
o
w
°
�°°
�
o
Z
�,,
00
m
m
Packet Page -407-
N
O N
O O
A
c)O
c
D
M Z
O < O
O c
z
C) O
M N D
D n
Z T
0 m
M N
2 X
O Z
12/13/2011 Item 8.6.
—1
cn
T
M
m
M
M
D
O
p
D
m
M
r
w
v
r
C)
m
'1'1
Z
H
*
�
rr
O
Cu
n
z
n
m
m
m
--I
r)
O
O
?
y
M
C
V
=
Z
m
F
z
Ln
N,
VIP
.p
1-
F-&
l0
W
F�
-A
C
C1
OA
V 1
'
w
O
W
W
W
WO
o
W
O
Cn
l0
O
Ln
to
Z
o
O
O
o
o
C
0
C)
0
W
N
W
N
I10
I1I
kD
N
-ft
•
W
0)
�
Ln
'
lo
O
W
O
O
p
N
o
W
�
00
00
00
o
00
o
0
O
o00
o
O
m
cn
o
0
o
►
v
N
N
00
oo
00
o
0
0
0
0
Z
c
°
m
0
u,
o
o
o
6
o�
_
S"
0
0
0
w
IN
m
Packet Page -408-
Fa N
O O
O
O �
O C'7
N C
> Z
M <
O
O �
O O
-n (J9
m p
o
c Z
_ o
r m
X
Z z
G) G)
O
r
r
M
n
O
Z
n
M
M
LA
n
12/13/2011 Item 8.13.
-I
D
r
Ln rn
M
rn
Lt
::E
D
m
H
T
M
G)
G
D
r
�
z
T
O
M
O
z
m
N
=
�
—
d
O
a
M
O
r)
m
K
M
z
-�
O
C
n
—i
z
m
--
r=
m
z
G)
N
00
O
0
V�r
o
00
VIA-
uj
C
kD
O
o
o
M
ONO
ca
O
W
V
�
o
w
a)
O
o
I�
(3)
o)
O
N
Un
u,
0
:;a
m
y
01
l'AO
0
O
W
O
0°
0
N
0
w
O
°O
01
(
o
N
0
l0
W
0
I-A
lD
o
O
00
c
O
O
p
w
c
O
0
0
0
in.
0
°
O
•00
�o
w
01
°
°
0)
un
°o
0
Z
n
m
w
m
Packet Page -409-
Fa N
O O
F'
O n O
A = r-
m
m
m ZZI
h O
T ci+ C
O z
� O
O
D m D
r p �
W T
C z p m
M m
C N
X
z z
G) G)
e Y
NOTICE OF INTENT TOCONSIDER -_
ORDINANCE -
Notice is hera by. given that on
Tay, December 13; 201, in
- the:BOardroom;' :3rd Floa r,
Administration BUildlnq; Cpllier
County (31"In em Canter, 3299.
Tomiami Trail East, Naples, Florida,
the Board of County Commissloneri
will consider 'the a ctm nt of s
.County Ordnance. The meetng will
commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of
the proposed Ordmarm ism follows:
AN ORDNANCE OF TH E BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
I C£NERAL GOVE
IMPACT FEE RAT
ACCORDANCE WO
INDEXING METHOD
'A TWO-YEAR 'A
PROVIDES FOR A
ARE LOWER THAN THE.RATES THAT
W.DULD BE GENERATED BY THE
APPLICATION OF THE INDEX, BASED
ON THE 50% REDUCTION OF -FEES
THAT' WAS IMPLEMENTED IN
OCTOBER -2010; ACCEPTING THE
CALCULATION OF THE INDEXING
PERCENTAGES FOR THF LAW
ENFORCEMENT IMPACT -FEE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED
INTO
USLY
THOSE THAT WOULD BE GENERATED
BY THE. APPLICAl"Ole OF THE INDEX;
PROVID I NG FOR %CONFLICT AND
SEVERABILITY;. PROVIDING FOR
INCLUSION .IN'.THE COLLIER COUNTY
CODE OF. LAWS AND ORDINANCES
AND PROVIDING FOR A DELAYED
EFFECTIVE DATE OFO" DECEMBER 20,
2011.
A co py of the proposed Ordinance is
on -Ne with the -Clark to the Board,
and is ..liable for inspection. All
interested parties are Invited to attend
andbe heard.
NOTE AN persom Wishing to speak
on any agenda Rem must register with
the """my prior to
presenat.cn of -the agenda Item t0 be
addressed. IndividuN speakers v! he
limited to3 minute on arty ibm. The
.demon of •n- mcilvidual to- rpeik on
behalf of en organization or group is
enmuroged.' If recognized by the
Chairman, a sPeAeWerson fora group
or organlzetion may be allotted 10
minutes to speak ii an item.
Persons - wishing to have written or
graphic mabrials included in the
Board agim packets must : submit
said manrlsl a - minimum of 3 week,
prior to the respective public hearing:
In any case, wrftten materials
intended - to. be considered by the
Board shag be' submitted to the
epproprutr
df seven daCos u my ri oa .' t h-,' tibuIm
hearing. All •material used n
rives rations before +the Board. III
become a . pl,7amm : part of the
record : :. ' -.
aisioeo f tthe0 Board wiilll wneeed
word of the proceedmi p=ing
thereto and therefore, may need to
erliure that a verbatim recordof the
proasdings. is. made, which .. record
ncludes the tesU r and 'evidence
upon which dreappaal a based.
H you arc e. person with a disability
who needs arty accommodation In
order to participate. In this
proaedin9• you are entitled. at no
cost to you to tlx prodsion of --n
assistaras:. Pleau -comad the {oNier
County ,Facilities Management
Depaitment;.. leca[ed at 3335-Tamlami
Trait: Easl, 'SUhe '101, Nap7e's, .FlcrWa;
(239) Z53 -9380; et least two tlays poor
10 the meeting. Anlsted -M nirg
devioss for'the hearing ampii2d are
available in the Board of County
C_iI,iioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
FRED W. COYLE, CHAIRMAN
_DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Ann sennejohn, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
December 2.2011 No. 1929390
Packet Page -410-
12/13/2011 Item 8. B.
r
D
m
a
n-
CD
m
cT,
3-
CF.
m.
N..
0,:.
00.
Z
D,
r-
In
rn
to
O
D
Z
rn
In
L)1