Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
HEX Agenda 07/26/2018
AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY,JULY 26,2018 IN CONFERENCE ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING®ULATION BUILDING, 2800 N.HORSESHOE DRIVE,NAPLES,FLORIDA INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. PETITION NO. VA-PL20170002719 — Joseph Paiva requests a variance from the minimum rear yard setback in Ordinance No. 14-10,as amended,the Temple Citrus Grove RPUD,to reduce the minimum rear yard setback on an open space lot from 3 feet to .1 feet for an existing pool screen enclosure and pool, located at Lot 176, Temple Citrus Grove subdivision, also described as 13636 Mandarin Circle, in Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn,AICP,Principal Planner] B. PETITION NO. BDE-PL20170004086 — 179 Topanga, LLC requests a 20 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 40 feet to construct a docking facility to accommodate two vessels for the benefit of Lot 87 of Southport on the Bay Unit One, also described as 179 Topanga Drive, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn,AICP,Principal Planner] 4. OTHER BUSINESS 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN NATURE OF PETITION QUESTIONS 1. This request is for an after the fact variance for the construction of a pool and pool enclosure permitted and constructed within the setback from the landscape buffer easement. The building permit# PRBD2015123977201 for the job description: POOL, SPA, PAVER DECK, LED LIGHTS, SCREEN AS BARRIER, ALARMS, 2.0 E JANDY PUMP, with a master permit # PRPO20150619412 shows Temple Citrus Grove Lot 176 to have a 15ft rear setback from what was thought to be the property line. This fails to recognize the landscape buffer easement that borders the property. Unfortunately, the border of the landscape buffer easement was mistaken as the property line. Based on the development standards for Temple Citrus RPUD, rear yard accessory setbacks are a minimum of 3ft, but due to the misunderstanding of the location of the property line by the pool contractor and the building department, the project was built within the setback from the landscape easement. The permit, #PRBD2015123977201, was approved by the building department on 1/5/16. After approval, the pool and pool screen enclosure were constructed. Right now, the screen enclosure is effectively 0.1ft and the water’s edge of the pool is at 1.3ft from the property line, so in order to meet the code, everything would need to be moved to meet the 3ft requirement. Thus, causing the request for an after the fact variance. 2. a. Yes, the special conditions and/or circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved are that the adjacent landscape easement caused confusion between the contractor and permit department. b. Yes, the conditions and circumstances which are not a result from the action of the applicant are as follows: the construction of a pool and pool enclosure were permitted and constructed within the setback from the landscape buffer easement. Pool and pool enclosure were constructed as permitted. c. Yes, literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code will work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant and/or create practical difficulties on the applicant because the pool and pool enclosure are already built therefore demolition and reconstruction would cause an impossible financial burden on the property owner. The applicant is hoping that the grant of this variance will make what has been constructed legal. d. Yes, the variance, if granted, will be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare since the pool and enclosure already have been constructed. e. No, granting the variance requested will not confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by those zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures on the same zoning district because although the pool is approximately 1.7ft closer to the property line, the pool is a standard size and is not larger because of the variance. f. Yes, granting this variance will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare mainly because this lot (Lot 176) is abutting a 15ft landscape buffer easement, not an adjacent property line. g. Yes, the natural condition that ameliorates the goals and objectives of the regulation is the abutting 15ft landscape maintenance easement that separates this property from its neighbors. h. Yes, granting the variance will be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. PROJECT NARRATIVE This is a request is for an after the fact variance for the construction of a pool and pool enclosure that was permitted and constructed within the setback from the property’s landscape buffer easement. The building permit #PRBD2015123977201 for the job description: POOL, SPA, PAVER DECK, LED LIGHTS, SCREEN AS BARRIER, ALARMS, 2.0 E JANDY PUMP, with a master permit #PRPO20150619412 shows Temple Citrus Grove Lot 176 to have a 15ft rear setback from what was thought to be the property line, but fails to recognize the landscape buffer easement that borders the property. Unfortunately, the border of the landscape buffer easement was mistaken as the property line. Based on the development standards for Temple Citrus RPUD, rear yard accessory setbacks are at a minimum of 3ft, but due to the misunderstanding of the location of the property line by the pool contractor and building department, the project was built within the setback from the landscape easement. The permit #PRBD2015123977201, was approved by the building department on 1/5/16. After approval, the pool and pool screen enclosure were constructed. Right now, the screen enclosure is effectively 0.1ft from the property line and the water’s edge of the pool is 1.3ft from the property line. In order to meet the code, both pool and pool enclosure would need to be demolished and reconstructed at the 3ft line that is required, which would cause an impossible financial burden on the property owner. Therefore, we are requesting an after the fact variance in order to bring this into legal conformity. We find that based on the LCD Section 9.04.03, letters B, C, D, E, F, and H are all relevant to this situation. Notification of Variance to Property Owners and Associations within 150 feet Amended Letter (Date) Name Address City, State Zip Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the sender has made a formal application to Collier County for a variance from the requirements of the zoning regulations as they apply to the following described property: The subject property is located at Lot 176, Temple Citrus Grove subdivision, also described as 13636 Mandarin Circle in Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Joseph Paiva requests a variance from the minimum rear yard setback in Ordinance No. 14-10, as amended, the Temple Citrus Grove RPUD, to reduce the minimum rear yard setback on an open space lot from 3 feet to .1 feet for an existing pool screen enclosure and pool on the aforementioned property. It is our intent to ask the County to allow us to have relief from the requirement that a pool be set back 3ft for the pool being set back .1 ft from the property line The pool was constructed based on an unfortunate misunderstanding by the pool contractor and building department permit office of the location of the property line due to a landscape buffer easement which borders the property. Since the pool and screen enclosure are already built, demolition and reconstruction would cause a serious financial burden on the property owner. The property owner is hoping that the grant of this variance will make what has been constructed legal. In order to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our intention, we will be contacting you directly within the next few days or you may choose to telephone the sender for further information. In any event, please be advised that we are interested in assuring you that our request should not adversely affect your property interest. Sincerely, Nassau Pools Construction, Inc 3420 Westview Drive Naples, FL 34104 T: 239.643.0900 AGENDA ITEM 3-B Cao t bier County MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JULY 26, 2018 SUBJECT: BDE-PL20170004086, 179 TOPANGA DRIVE, 179 TOPANGA LLC DOCK PROPERTY OWNERIAPPLICANT: 179 Topanga LLC 4261 Brynwood Drive Naples, PL 34119 REQUESTED ACTION: AGENT: Jeff Rogers Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 The applicant is requesting a 20 -foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code (LDC) to allow a total protrusion of 40 feet in order to accommodate a new boat dock facility on a parcel zoned Lely Barefoot Beach Planned Unit Development (PUD). GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject site is located at 179 Topanga Drive. The site is further described as Lot 87, Southport on the Bay, Unit 1, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County (see location map on the following page). PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of the request is to allow an extension for a boat dock facility that protrudes 40 feet into the waterway in order to accommodate a 35 -foot long vessel. There is one BDE application that was previously approved by the HEX immediately to the west of this boat dock extension request located at 181 Topanga Drive which was approved on October 17, 2417 for a 35 -foot protrusion into the waterway. BDE-PL20170004086, '179 Topanga LLC Dock Page 1 of 8 June 26, 2018 v rm ry � � r N p o, 00a 0 0 p 0 co rn Bonita Beach RD Bare • f PROJECT f LOCATION f� f• 5� J , I E.Ek- EFOOT iCx f Location Map RSF- 7, eo 4B6 V U'5', 6f7 Ur . BD f5 AST �5 SITE LOCATION 89 OD 88 85 86 7 88 LY 8 PU LOT 107 79 79 81 80 81 Petition Number: PL20170004086 Zoning Map SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the subject site. North: Man-made waterway off Little Hickory Bay. South: Topanga Drive (local road) then single family residential, zoned Lely Barefoot Beach PUD at (2.25 DU/AC). East: Single-family residential, zoned Lely Barefoot Beach PUD at (2.25 DU/AQ. West: Single-family residential, zoned Lely Barefoot Beach PUD at (2.25 DU/AQ. Aerial (County GIS) BDE-PL20170004086, 179 Topanga LLC Dock Page 3 of 8 June 26, 2018 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The proposed dock is to be constructed through an existing Conservation Easement containing a mangrove fringe. The Conservation Easement allows a four feet wide access walkway to a docking facility. A submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged resources in the area 200 feet beyond the proposed docking facility. Exhibit sheet 7 of 7 provides an aerial illustrating that no seagrasses were observed within 200 feet of the proposed structure. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review, because this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. ANALYSIS: In accordance with LDC Section 5.03.06.H., the Collier County Hearing Examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve this request, at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria must be met: Primary Criteria: 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The proposed facilities will consist of one boat slip, which is appropriate in relation to the 62.94 feet of shoreline. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion met. There is adequate water depth for the vessel; however, the applicant will need an extension from the mangrove. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) BDE-PL20170004086, 179 Topanga LLC Dock Page 4 of 8 June 26, 2018 Criterion met. The applicant stated, "The proposed docking facility will not have adverse impacts on navigation within the adjacent channel, which is not a marked channel" Staff concurs. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion not met. The drawing in the applicant's support material labeled Width of Waterway shows the waterway is 105 feet wide at mean high water line (MHWL). The drawing does not indicate the percentage of the dock protrusion into the waterway; however, based on the distances provided on the drawing, staff estimates it would be approximately 38%. This protrusion would exceed the maximum allowed protrusion of 25%. The mangrove to mangrove measurement is 78 feet, which is adequate for navigability. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. The drawing in the applicant's support material labeled Proposed Line shows the proposed dock would be 15 feet from the east riparian line and 15 feet from the west riparian line. The survey indicates the proposed dock facility will not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. Secondary Criteria: 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. A submerged resources survey was performed by Turell Hall and Associates on January 11, 2018. The survey indicates that negative impacts to the submerged resources are not expected with the proposed dock facility. There are mangroves on the site which necessitates the extension of the boat dock keeping the vessel out of the mangroves. As such, the drawing in the applicants support material labeled Width of Waterway shows the mangrove to mangrove measurement is 78 feet which is adequate for vessel navigability. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area). Criterion met. As shown on the drawings by the petitioner, the deck area is not excessive. BDE-PL20170004086, 179 Topanga LLC Dock Page 5 of 8 June 26, 2018 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion not met. The subject property contains 62.94 feet of water and canal frontage, and the vessel is 35 feet or 56% of the water/canal frontage. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The proposed facility will be setback from the riparian lines in accordance with the requirements of the LDC. The drawing in the applicant's support material labeled Width of Waterway shows that the proposed facility will be comparable to the others along the same waterway. The drawing labeled Cross Section depicts the aluminum support beams of the boat lift. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. The submerged resources survey provided indicates that no seagrass beds exists within the footprint of the dock. No seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated. Criterion not applicable. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do not apply to individual docks behind individual residences. Staff analysis finds this request complies with four of the five of the primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria. Therefore, under the LDC provisions, the installation of a new boat dock facility requires approval by the Collier County Hearing Examiner. The recommendation by staff is approval. Furthermore, it shall be noted that the principal structure/dwelling is currently under construction via Permit #PRBD20180427367. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, an aggrieved petitioner, or adversely affected property owner, may appeal such final action to the Board of County Commissioners. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Department Administrator within 30 days of the Decision by the Hearing Examiner. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30 -day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. BDE-PL20170004086, 179 Topanga LLC Dock Page 6 of 8 June 26, 2018 COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on June 29, 2018. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve Petition BDE- PL20170004086. Attachments: A) Application & Support Material BDE-PL20170004086, 179 Topanga LLC Dock Page 7 of 8 June 26, 2018 PREPARED BY: TIMOTHY F , AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE :3Y ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: 7 3 t(b RAYMOV V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER ATE ZONING DIVISION MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION BOE-PL20170004086, 179 Topanga LLC back Page 8 of June 26, 2018 Attachment A Gvier Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX. (239) 252-6358 DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION LDC Section 5.03.06 Ch. 3 B. of the Administrative Code THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): ■❑ DOCK EXTENSION ❑ BOATHOUSE PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): 179 Topanga LLC Address: 4261 Brynwood Drive City- Naples Telephone: Cell: 239-209-3999 E -Mail Address: Ezio@distinctivedevlopmentgroup.com Name of Applicant/ Agent: Jeff Rogers Firm: Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc Address: 3584 Exchange Ave City: Naples Telephone: 239-643-0166 Cell: 239-784-0081 E -Mail Address: Jeff@thanapies.com PROPERTY LOCATION Section/Township/Range: 06/ 48/ 25 Subdivision: Southport on the Bay Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 179 Topanga Drive State: FL ZIP: 34119 Fax: State: FL ZIP: 34104 Fax: 239-643-6632 Property I.D. Number: 74435007507 Unit: 1 Lot: 87 Block: Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: Lely Barefoot Beach PUD / single-family residential, duplex residential, etc. BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 8/03/2017 Page 1 of 6 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE I DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): The proposed work entails the construction of a new single-family fixed docking facility that is approximately 207 square feet of over water structure with ane optional boat lift. The proposed dock will protrude approximately 40 -feet from the most restrictive point into a waterway that is approximately 105 -feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. The applicant is requesting for a 20 -foot extension from the allowed 20 -feet SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 105 ft. Measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate 0 other (specify) Aerial 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 62.94 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 15&15 ft. Required: 15 & 15 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 40 ft. S. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 35 ft. 2. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: There are numerous other docking facilities on Little Hickory Bay and surrounding waterways, all of which protrude approximately 20' to 50' out into the same waterway 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? Q24 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No If yes, please provide copies. 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 6 Zoning Land Use N A -ST Hickory Bay S Lely Barefoot Beach PUD Right-of-way for Topanga Drive E Lely Barefoot Beach PUD Lot 86 (Single-family Residential) W Lely Barefoot Beach PUD Lot 88 (Single-family Residential) DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): The proposed work entails the construction of a new single-family fixed docking facility that is approximately 207 square feet of over water structure with ane optional boat lift. The proposed dock will protrude approximately 40 -feet from the most restrictive point into a waterway that is approximately 105 -feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. The applicant is requesting for a 20 -foot extension from the allowed 20 -feet SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 105 ft. Measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate 0 other (specify) Aerial 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 62.94 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 15&15 ft. Required: 15 & 15 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 40 ft. S. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 35 ft. 2. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: There are numerous other docking facilities on Little Hickory Bay and surrounding waterways, all of which protrude approximately 20' to 50' out into the same waterway 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? Q24 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No If yes, please provide copies. 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 6 Coder COunt COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX. (239) 252-6358 PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide [MLT]. (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel {s} described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 6 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergoy.net [239] 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.061 must be demonstrated.) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03,06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) 9/28/2017 Page 4 of 6 Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: 0 Dock Extension ❑ Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 ® ❑ Property Ownership Disclosure Form Signed and Sealed Survey ❑ ❑ ❑ Chart of Site Waterway ❑ Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); ■ Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 1 ❑ ❑ facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 1 ® ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ® ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please be advised: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all 1 ❑ ❑ materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 9/28/2017 Page 5 of 6 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: FEE REQUIREMENTS: 0 Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 C An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. 1 understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34184 Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date 9/28/2017 Page 6 of 6 Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive ❑irector F-1 Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet LJ Addressing: Annis Moxam LJ Graphics: Beth Yang ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ®Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Sign -In Sheet E]Meeting Parks and Recreation: David Berra ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnsonj� El School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Emergency Management. Dan Summers; andlor EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Engineering: Brett Rosenblum FEE REQUIREMENTS: 0 Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 C An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. 1 understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34184 Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date 9/28/2017 Page 6 of 6 The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Response: The total waterfront length for this property is 63 -ft. The zoning and upland land use is single family residential which warrants no more than 2 slips per CC -LDC; the current proposed dock design has 1 boat slip. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) Response: See attached survey/drawing illustrating the existing water depths, mangrove/vegetation line which is within the Conservation Easement (CE) located along the subject property shoreline. There are two factors that are the driving force for the required BDE which are the shallow water depths and the mangrove shoreline. The mean high water line (MHWL) is the most restrictive point but due to limitation of removing or trimming the mangroves because of the CE and the shallow water depths the dock footprint is being proposed in the only location that will allow for safe ingress/egress to the proposed slip. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Response: The proposed docking facility will not have adverse impacts on navigation within the adjacent waterway, which is not a marked channel. The proposed docking facility is located within a canal where minimal to no navigation occurs other than local residence. The entire waterway is used for navigation as there are no navigational markers indicating the exact thread of navigation. The proposed docking facility provides adequate space for navigation through this waterway and the properties across the waterway already have docking facilities which are not directly across from the proposed dock. This will ensure there will be adequate space for navigation. 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Response: The proposed docking facility protrudes approximately 40 -feet from the MHWL into a waterway that is approximately 105 -feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. This correlates to approximately 38% width of waterway therefore, the dock does not maintain the required percentages based on the criteria. 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Response: The proposed dock facility will provide 40 -foot clearance to the neighboring dock to the west and approximately 80 -feet to the neighboring dock to the east. These clearances both provide adequate space for a dock to be built and still provide safe ingress/egress for the typical sized vessels within Little Hickory Bay. 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Response: The proposed docking facility design was mostly driven by the presence of the Conservation Easement (CE) and associated mangrove shoreline vegetation. The CE being located along the entire shoreline is the one special condition other than water depths driving the dock design to protrude out past the mangrove fringe therefore requiring the BIDE approval. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Response: The proposed dock facility has been minimized to the fullest extent possible and still provide adequate and safe access to and from the vessel. The proposed docking facility size and design are consistent with the surrounding area. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Response: The proposed docking facility has been designed to only moor one vessel up to 30 -feet which is less than 50% the subject property's linear waterfront footage. 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) Response: The proposed dock facility will provide one boatlift that will not have a major impact on the waterfront view of either neighboring property. The proposed docking facility is consistent with others on this canal and will not affect neighboring properties view of the waterway. 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 1 must be demonstrated.) Response: There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200' of the existing dock structure. 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) Response: The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee Protection Requirements. MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY OF LOT 87, SOUTMORT ON THE BAY UNIT 4 LYING1,0 CURVE TABLE 4 0 CURVE DELTA M RADIUS M ARC M CHORD BEARING M CHORD M C IN SECITON F TnWNSHIP 48 SOUTh� RANGE ZS FAST LEGEND c11 18.27'50" 1 340.00' 1 109.57' 1 S77'24'27"E 109.09' 1 //+�O ii //+��/�/��}ry�TY, ��y�/� O C2 3'4751" 340.00' 22.53' S66'20'33"E 22.53' Q =FOUND PK FLAIL AND DISK _ MlFpBfE COLLIIIt COUNTY, 1 1, 1 J./�/RIDA = DENCHUM, SET PK Fd 6. AND DSK - lB 6696' = FOUND 5/6' RDW AND GIP - TEN 5013' Q = FOUND 5/6' REEM - NO IDENTMATXFN Q = FOUND 5/6' RDW AND GIP - 'POWELLA ROWE- QOQ - FOUND 516' REM AND CAP - 'RHODES' N - FOUND 4' X 4' CONCRETE NWKWNT WRN 1/4' REW Q = FOUND 3' X 3' CONCRETE 40NINENT WRH ALUUmm GIP - No ID (M) = FIELD WASURED DATA (P) = RECORD PUT DATA * = SPOT ELEYATXFN (94M 1966) SURVEYOR'S NOTES a46E FLOOD Euv=ns.0' (HAw '66) 1 inch = 30 ft. Q�0 n I. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON THE REAR SURVEY TIE h ti * y LINE HAVING A RECORD BEARING OF N53'05'02"E AS SHOWN ON THE PLATL'" LOT 86 OF RECORD. LOT 87 * o e VACANT M16 LOT 85 2. NO UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS OR FOUNDATIONS WERE LOCATED 0 UNDER THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY. tis °° David S. Di 'tally signed by 3. THIS PARCEL LIES 9 FLOOD ZONE AE' AS SHOWN ON FEMA FI.R.M. MAP PANEL 12021CD 179H, DATED MAY 16, 2012. THIS PARCEL HAS A Dav d S. Dagostlno, BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 11.0' & 12.0' (NAVD '88). FLOOD ZONE LINES PSM *`M1 p am r DCg= SHOWN HEREON WERE SCALED FROM THE INDICATED F.LR.M. MAP PANEL. C2D' ( agostino,; 3i= 4. BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON THE RECORD ` i /�� \ 1�5 Date:' 018.01 s PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROWOED, NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC \ FBoy Qo - _ PSM X17.0 05'00' RECORD WAS PERFORMED BY THIS SURVEYOR. THERE MAY BE OTHER i �� ,5 'fi - SETBACKS AND/OR EASEMENTS NOT KNOWN TO THIS SURVEYOR. 5. THE STREET ADDRESS IS: 179 TOPANGA DRIVE BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34134 �7 a 8. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN � � .? VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD '88). ELEVATIONS ARE BASED UPON BENCHMARK 'R-4" HAVING A RECORD ELEVATION OF 5.42' NAVD '88. 60 (P) — I<$ LEGAL DESCRIPTION 39 RAr wY E a (AI4w '66) a I LOT 87, SOUTHPORT ON THE BAY, UNIT ONE, A SUBDIVISION E W11E ntv . a®• S ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED /N PLAT ' BOOK 15, PAGES 51 THROUGH 53, INCLUSIVE, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. _ _ — — _ € Jill CURVE DELTAP RADIUS P ARC P CHORD BEARINCHORD P C7 18''28' 340.00' 109.60' N7T'2413"W 0911" 1.13 ' C2 347'50" 340.00' 22.53' 12"E 56616' 22.53' LPITLE HICKORY BAYLuc y �� COFSERVATIpN EASEMENT (P) O9 N1470'TOP PLAN HnN WATER LINE a o y OF MW ry� . ?9�, Nj4?p.T �? 7g?,??8 J6„ ( ELENIOON 0.0' (NAM '68) AS LOCATED W14RY 16, 1017 �Y-* lQl � ii F N74Zp79w � l�� ��� � gK� 91 (A0 (4!f �pIRV'47RAVF��� �, c �" g ��°0Pqb0b9� `i eFl 1 N7o•F9aow 68.Ip R F7' (M`` J J CONSERVATXFN EASEMENT (P) w tp .'N VEGETATXFN �? S u E yy h LINE a h ^� o j 1-eSR`—NELINE GRAPHIC SCALE goo 1 y''� y^ 4 FLOOD ZONE AE' O15 30 2 N 2 FLOOD E1EY=0' (N4YD '86) 5 � BASE H 11. � 3 I V LOT 88 FLOOD ZONE ;fE' a g ty ( IN FEET I o'"m SURVEYOR'S NOTES a46E FLOOD Euv=ns.0' (HAw '66) 1 inch = 30 ft. Q�0 n I. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON THE REAR SURVEY TIE h ti * y LINE HAVING A RECORD BEARING OF N53'05'02"E AS SHOWN ON THE PLATL'" LOT 86 OF RECORD. LOT 87 * o e VACANT M16 LOT 85 2. NO UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS OR FOUNDATIONS WERE LOCATED 0 UNDER THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY. tis °° David S. Di 'tally signed by 3. THIS PARCEL LIES 9 FLOOD ZONE AE' AS SHOWN ON FEMA FI.R.M. MAP PANEL 12021CD 179H, DATED MAY 16, 2012. THIS PARCEL HAS A Dav d S. Dagostlno, BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 11.0' & 12.0' (NAVD '88). FLOOD ZONE LINES PSM *`M1 p am r DCg= SHOWN HEREON WERE SCALED FROM THE INDICATED F.LR.M. MAP PANEL. C2D' ( agostino,; 3i= 4. BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED UPON THE RECORD ` i /�� \ 1�5 Date:' 018.01 s PLAT AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROWOED, NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC \ FBoy Qo - _ PSM X17.0 05'00' RECORD WAS PERFORMED BY THIS SURVEYOR. THERE MAY BE OTHER i �� ,5 'fi - SETBACKS AND/OR EASEMENTS NOT KNOWN TO THIS SURVEYOR. 5. THE STREET ADDRESS IS: 179 TOPANGA DRIVE BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34134 �7 a 8. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN � � .? VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD '88). ELEVATIONS ARE BASED UPON BENCHMARK 'R-4" HAVING A RECORD ELEVATION OF 5.42' NAVD '88. 60 (P) — I<$ LEGAL DESCRIPTION 39 RAr wY E a (AI4w '66) a I LOT 87, SOUTHPORT ON THE BAY, UNIT ONE, A SUBDIVISION E W11E ntv . a®• S ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED /N PLAT ' BOOK 15, PAGES 51 THROUGH 53, INCLUSIVE, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. _ _ — — _ € Jill AFFIDAVIT OF: AUTHORIZATION FOR PETIVON NUMBERS(S)?L- 401 1 "0appGcalslej �at�t {print namej, sa LU �C ursder aeth, M) owner(Company. If Iicablej, swear or Ld-WaPpllcantLordract purchaser and that: 7. 1 have full eutharity to secure the approval($) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions or the refe"enoed proPelty as s result of any action approved by the County pplicsdion and the Land De*opment Code; in accordance with this 2. All answers to the questions in yrs aPOiWlon and any sketches, data or other suppjementary herd hereto and made a part of this apPlic�On are honest and true; metier 3. i have authONZed tt staff of Collier County to enter upon the for the Purpose of invest �Y during normal working hours igatln8 and evaluating the royuest made through this application, and that 4 � dons smpoW ty will pa trensferredI conveyed, soil or subdivided subject to the cOnch ns and b• INeR autttn by the ved on. in any matters regardIn #his l�ition including 1 through above. to ourltny representative 'Notes. If m Me s appdJcant is a corpomtion, !herr it is usually executed by the corp, pre& or v. pr+ea pPficant is a Limited Liebllify+ Company (LLC.) Or Limited Company (L.C), thea the documents should typically be signed by fhe Company s 'Man Member, • it the a Wkant is a partnership, HM 6*0 yy a partner can sign on behalf of the appNcaent Is a 1 � rahip, then the Aa►fnership. 'f the WOW of the named #- general partner tnus[ sign and be ldanSriad as the g,&n&ral ■ 'f the appiicent is a trugf, than fhey Must include the trustees name and Abe words as MA -tee' • In each insts►tcs, first dat&nnkm the aWkarit's use die appmpniete harmer for that ownership. 'shMe g irrdlvldual, corporsts, host, partnership, and than Under penalties rlury, I declare that I have read the fact# ft true. Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER the foregoing Afiidevit of Authoraatlan and that Date The faregaing ins Brit was sworn to {ar effim,ed) ar>d subscribed 4 before me on r_ -r_ (date) by (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as {type of iderrt gcatlon) as iderrtifiralion rF is Ae►avrrafly known to me or who has produced . �V aL$TAIiAr>qL L Sion re4ola" Public G`DA-O�iI�Il3S REV &W14 [1137 71 ¢a; _ Vrviana Franco s GOMWA SIOH OFF9481+ EXPIRES- August 27, 2619 `� www,AAFtormNOtARY.c& C;01 it Gaunt y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierigov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMQ_Addressing a@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing ersonnel vrior to re -a lira#ion meeting, lease allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. items in hold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) �] BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) South Port on the Bay Unit One Lot87 6-48-25 FOLIO (Property ID) NLIMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 74435007507 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 179 Topanga Drive * LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) 179 TopangaDR PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 CO e -r CaKHty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: 0 email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Jeff Rogers Phone: 239-643-0166 EmaillFax: ieff@THANapies.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 74435007507 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: 11/29/1? Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 0, 01 434683 ISO NOV 29 PH Zss DC"R,I.O(j NERVATION EASENWRDED STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS. REC COUNTY OF COLLIER ) PSK JVM DOC ��% KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that for and in consideration INT -of issuance of State of Florida Department of Environmental IND—Regulation Permits Numbered 111501035 and 111703805 in the name of p SOUTHPORT VENTURE ASSOCIATES, a general partnership and other good= � and valuable considerations, the receipt of which is herebyco ` acknowledged, SOUTHPORT VENTURE ASSOCIATES, a general partnership, O Ln ("Grantor") has bargained, sold, conveyed and granted to the STATE to or FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION ("Grantee"), 74_,1 t3olf Course Boulevard, Punta Gorda, Florida 33950-9359, a non- ,c!xclusive conservation easement in accordance with Section 704.06, Florida Statues (1985), in and over the real property located in Collier County, Florida and described on the attached Exhibit "A". I. This Easement conveys to Grantee a perpetual non-exclusive interest in the property, consisting of the following affirmative and negative covenants on the part of the Grantor and Grantor's successors and assigns: a. No construction or placing of buildings, roads, signsQ o billboards or other adverti as or other structures o� m any kind whatsoever on he the property shall b co undertaken without p rdw o stat tee. w b. No d �� acing of r>., her substance whatsoever or r placing of trash, a unsightly or offensive mat i the property. C. No rem a action of native tr es, hrubs, or ether veget tion n roper d. N exc vation, dre i o removal of loam, eat, gravel, soil, roc or r' t. n as t affect the surfs a on e r y e• o su ac use xc pt fo r t it rmi the land or water are ma n p om na tl a natu 1 on ion on the property. f. tivities detrimental to rain& , f control, water man water conservation, Ater qua i erosion control, so servation or fish or w e bi servation on the props q. No a or ses detrimental t^ such 'Y of land or water area on t tY. h. Grantor a4fs n 11 maintain the iescribed real pr pe f e V?m e _ on. o[2. Provided, however, ement shall not preclude Sthe following specific activities from being undertaken on the U. subject property as authorized pursuant to the above referenced c Permits Numbered 111501035 and 11.1703805. a a. The placement, construction and maintenance of ramps and JHS walkways for access and single family boat docks for property ,_0 owners and associations of such property owners within the awm Southport on the Bay subdivision, provided such access ramps or sr) walkways do not exceed 4' in width. mmd' h. Maintenance of mangroves located adjacent to residential a4- .lots within Southport on the Bay Subdivision provided such '°0N0,• mangroves may not be trimmed to a height of less than ten (10) mm� feet 0.'Tg d,nE., c_ Grantor retains and reserves the use of the property for EC4oa any and all purposes which do not interfere with and prevent the W.49. it ..uses herein granted to the Grantee. X01 515 1100991E OR BOOK PAGE 3. In the event of violation of any covenant contained in this Conservation Easement, Grantee shall be entitled to pursue all available legal and equitable remedies, including injunction. 4. Grantee may, in its sole discretion, transfer its rights under this Easement to such other state or local agency or to a private or public organization provided same is dedicated to the conservation and preservation of land in its natural state. It is understood that the granting of this Conservation Easement entitles the Grantee or its authorized representatives to enter the above described land in a reasonable manner and at reasonable times to assure compliance. The Grantor on behalf of itself and its successors or assigns hereby agrees to bear all costs and liability relating to the operation and maintenance of the land subject to this Conservation Easement in the natural vegetative and hydrologic condition existing at the time of execution of this Conservation Easement, including the maintenance of enhanced or created wetlands in the vegetative and hydrologic Condit —required by the aforementioned permit, and Grantor doe rrn miCi� and hold harmless the Grantee from same. Cape thereby granted and the obligation t' i e land forever predominantly in a and by ition as herein specified hal n the land and sha ing upon the Grantor and s asors and assigns, and a 'nure to the benefit of th G e and its successors and as gns. Theto s a c nditionsthis Co rvation asem nt may be enforced b the ran injunctive i and of r a propriate available reme ies, and cart consents that v nue or such enforceme a i 11 exc sive n the ci uit ourt of the Seco d J c c C y, da. In any enforceme t ac on in ch th G a t re a'ls a ee all be entitled to co er r as ab a or I f s d sts in the trial an ap 1a e c is i s t' n o t c t f storing the land a 1 v g a i and d to i ndition existing a Con o a ment or to the ive and hydrologic c ition r by the aforementi , ermits. These remedie re i ad io to any other reme y�LF] a or penalty which may ppl' ab •ti r Chapter 403, Florid t tee. Any for on behalf of the Gra 1(0 ) ercise its rights in the a the failure ^.f Grantor c y with the provisions of h s rvation Easement a deemed or construed to be h9 Grant�� reunder in the event of any subseq t3� v `n' comply. IN WITNESS WHERE OF, er s execute this Grant of Conservation Easement on the daE- rst above written. Grantor= SOUTHPORT VENTURE ASSOCIATES, a New Jersey general partnership By: Orion Marketing, Inc., a general artner is Witness By.. Witness KeKnettv R Gluckman,•Its Presid#nt Received E --sr3~ C^r;:r :Cary Starrp T tix CCLrR 8Y. D': n0i5T5 000995 OR BOOK PAGE STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF COLLIER } The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Kenneth J. Gluckman, as President of Orion Marketing, Inc., a general partner of Southport Venture Associates this 6?'7 day of !l%Dy.6aBf� 1990. My COPRUS gJ O ����Bi pSTgxpiM , 7lilYi - LW.W 7WW SMAC ORS. UtiU. ( s$AL }, _ .. Notary Public Accepted: STATE OF COUNTY OF The Philip R My Commis LSy 1990 , 1990 me by s 28th This Instrument Prepared By4 George L. Consoer, Jr., Esq. HUMPHREY & KNOTT, P.A. 1625 Hendry Street Fort flyers, Florida 33901 RRRIBIT "Ae Legal Description of Conservation Resonant All Of that eartele property designated as Conservation Basement Area (C.M.) UPON the plat Of buthport on the Bay, 0ait One, as recorded at slat Rook 15, pages SI - 33, and the Plat of Southport on the Bey, unit Two, as recorded at Plat Book 16, Pages 100 - 101, beth recorded to the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. O o � o CP cn CD CD ;K t-^ t R COU Go�ti TtgU� ELLS HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MARINE & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 3584 Exchange Avenue c Naples, Florida 34104-3732 a 239-643-0166 o Fax (239) 643-6632 * Tuna@THAnaples.com June 6, 2018 Conservancy of Southwest Florida 1495 Smith Preserve Way Naples, FL 34102 RE: Collier County Boat Dock Extension PL20170004086 179 Topanga Drive To Whom It May Concern, Based on the Settlement Agreement between Collier County and the Conservancy of Southwest Florida, we are required to notify you of the proposed docking facility located at 179 Topanga Drive, Folio # 74435007507. The proposed project is currently in for a Collier County Boat Dock Extension due to the proposed dock being waterward of the allowed 20 -foot protrusion measurement. The project consist of constructing a new docking facility through the existing mangrove shoreline that is also a conservation easement (CE). The proposed dock includes a 4 -foot wide access walkway through the mangroves, which is allowed per the CE language and then expands out to 6 -foot wide approximately 18 -feet waterward of the mean high water line (MHWL). The total dock protrusion is 40 -feet from the MHWL and will be approximately 207 square feet of over water structure. Please see attached exhibits. According to the Agreement if written objections have not been received within 15 days of this submittal approval is presumed. T ards, Jeff Rogers Project Manager Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRBD2018042736701 PERMIT TYPE: GS ISSUED: BY: APPLIED DATE: 04-23-18 APPROVAL DATE: 04-23-18 MASTER #: COA: JOB ADDRESS: 179 TOPANGA DR JOB DESCRIPTION: 500 UG TANK W/ LINES TO W/H, BBQ, RANGE, P/H, JOB PHONE: AND 2 FIRE BOWLS 179 TOPANGA DR SUBDIVISION #: BLOCK: LOT: FLOOD MAP: ZONE: ELEVATION: FOLIO #: 74435007507 SECTION -TOWNSHIP -RANGE: 6-48-25 OWNER INFORMATION: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: 179 TOPANGA LLC S & S GAS SYSTEMS, INC 4261 BRYNWOOD DRIVE 17485 LEE RD NAPLES, FL 34119- FT MYERS, FL 33967 - CERTIFICATE #:: <No LICENSED PHONE: FCC CODE: CONSTRUCTION CODE: 0220 JOB VALUE: $2,475.00 TOTAL RES SOFT: 0 TOTAL COMM SOFT: 0 SETBACKS FRONT: REAR: LEFT: RIGHT: SEWER: WATER: CONTACT NAME: CONTACT PHONE: Per Collier County Ordinance No. 2002-01, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. INSTR 4506493 OR 4633 PG 2766 RECORDED 12/16/2010 4:01 PM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DOC@.70 $99,400.00 REC $18.50 CONS $14,200,000.00 Consideration: $14,200,000.00 Documentary Stamps: $99,400.00 Recording Fee: $18.50 R=ared by; Michael D. Gentzle, Esq. Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC 4001 Tamiami Trail North Suite 250 Naples, FL 34103 File Number. Fiore Parcel Identification No. 02930360009 fSpam Above Thi! Line For Recoding Data) Warranty Deed (STATUTORY FORM . SECTION 689.02, F.S.) This Indenture made this 11 day ` , Gasper V. bore and Joan hL Fiore, husband and wife, whose post offic s is 4540 Gordo Naples, FL 34102 of the County of Collier, State of Florida, grantor", d D. Berry, as Trustee th Paiko Trust dated June 4,2010** whose post office address is P.O. z 1 les, grant " Witnesseth that said grantor, fo an n o ND N0/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable co id ti s t said bra r d id grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has gran , a18i! the id and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described taste, lying and bein ' Co er , Florida, to -wit: Lots 23, 24, 25 and the No feet of Lot 26, Bl " " tlass Cove Section of Port Royal, as described in the P f recorded in Plat Page 101, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; and 38 and 10 feet of Lot 39, Block "A"', Beach Estates No. 2, as descri Obit orded in Plat Book 1, Page 69, Public Records of Collier County, Floe Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements common to the subdivision, if any, and taxes subsequent to 2010. ""with full power and authority to protect, to conserve, to sell, to lease, to encumber, or otherwise to manage and dispose of the real property described herein and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. "'Grantor' and 'Grantee" aro used for singular or plural, as contcxt requires. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantors hand and seal the day and year fust above written. D McTimes *** OR 4633 PG 2767 *** Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: (Signature of Witness #1) Print Name: J nn; &- �;e4a A4i - (Signature of Witness #2) Print Name: i C/ State of�i4npt) County ofjC-LU— The foregoing instrument was ac el Joan M. Fiore, who are pe !mown or L ] licenses as identification. [Notary Seal] OWN 140 *A,\, aot,b '7' � (Seal) aspic V. Fiore 2010 by Gasper V. Fiore and driver's n 2 SRV ,.. tinted Name: My Commission Expires: Warranty Deed (Statutory Forint - Page 2 Double rimes STATE QF FLC:)RI[DA CITY COLLIER COUNTY SITE ADDRESS: <? 179 TOPANGA DR NAPLES, FL 34134 °FT-MYERS" KEY WEST v . e-" NOM: — THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURP AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION — LATITUDE: N 28.329154 <>LONGITUDE: W-51.844783 MIA t --1 6'�. N. r .- �. r � SUBJECT .. MOPERTY { _ r- J- C VICINITY MAP COUNTY AERIAL Turrell Hall & Associates Inc. DEaG � ,� R 4R R. T 1 79 TO PAN GA EDFZIVFE ° -: — Marine & Environmental Consulting ���� 3 "Flo 17" 3584 Exchange Ave. Sade B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATION MAP W1 N.-. o, of az s _ twd— P6011e:(239) 643*166 Fax-Cn7 j643-6632-AALLSAXEA- secTiON-6 TOWNSHIP -46S PANGIE-25E ADJACENT rcirwrcugn DOCK LAN E EXISTING DJACENT DOCK PROPERTY LINE/ MHWL=0.0' (NAVD 88) CONSERVATION 4 EASEMENT I +�+ MLWL=-0.: - (N AVD 88} r- L . ! s SM ADDRESS: PROPERTY 179 TOPANGA DR BOUNDARY i NAPLES. FL 34134 �q• B7 e ` 2i 0 20 40 So NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR FFRYIT'f1HCPUPSG ES ONLY AND ATS NOT INTENDED FOR CCMTRUCTM LISE. • ALL OATUM SHOYM fiEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW • SURVEY CO NFTESY OF:-DAGOSTINL7 S WOOD, NC - •• SIR%-ry0ATE0: O7 -mi? • APPUCANTDYRJED SHORELINE V.PPX LF): 034 • EXISTING OVERMTERSTROOTURE IAPPXSFI p • WIM OF WATERWAY. MHW TO MHW(A JP 105 • TOIL DATUM: ML AST MHw{HAly- 10.w 1 ^E ... —J�. Turrell, Hall & Associates fuc. 06 11. Marine & Environmental Consulting 179 T C)PA N GA � F� IV E Wig~ 3584ExduageAvGSldcH. Naples, FL34104.3732 EXISTING AERIAL SWET Emaol: wnadmrrell assaiuzsoom Phnae. (239) 643-4166 Fax: (739) 6443.6632 REV PER Cr' - 4;r ' 4. SECTION -B TOWNSHIP -489 RANGE -25E S' - ra zo 40 RIPARIAN RIPARIAN FIXED D EXISTING ADJACENT DOCK tlo LINE RIPARIAN LINE , , i, SETBACK 1 4 4-. s� � coNSERVAnaN EAS€MENT t r} V a VL= -0.59' IID 88) PROPERTY LINE/ MHWL=0.0' ( VD 88) i 4}- 4� h ADJACENT Le NOTES: THESE DRAVMGS ARE FOR PEPJdWMNG PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT iNTENDM TIM CONSTRUCPDN USE ALL OATW 940M HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW SURVEY COURTESY OF -OAGOSTM& WOOD, ydO' •» SURVEY UATM 07.26.17 • APPUGNAT UhYW11 SIOREUNE{APPX LF7: 6224 • EMS1' lLi OVERY'MTFR STRUCTURr (APPX SO: 0 • NOTT }14F VhATL-R MY. AI TO MHVYIAAP%1: fW • TNLL DATLU » IaW;NAVDP= ksg •• MHW(kAL4)= •0.00, • PROPOSM OVER MTER STRVCTURECAPPXSF}. 207 • TOTALOVERMTF-R&TRi1CTURE{APPXSF) 207 TOTAL PROTRUSCH FROM MHY1l 1w Turrell Hall & Associates Inc. o HEa - MMU 01-� REVPERCOUNT Marine & Envimn>�ental Cm�sWling 1 79 T C) PA N G A ID FZ I E �' 11-15-17 ; 3584 FwhuW Aw, Suite B. NVIes, FL 34 1 M-3732 PROPOSED AERIAL X$ mo SKEET NO.: D� 030E U7 5, _ � R-9 d" — Pkw. (239) 643-0166 Fm: (234) 643-6632 SECTION- 6 TOWNSHIP- 48S Fb%NGE- 25E N S 0 iD 2U qQ 1 J RIPARIAN i scxc�xxr LINE �tt� 15.► f { r } ? RIPARIAN LINE SETBACK {� �'-- 6' 15' —} � � I _ PROPOSED AA FIXED DOCK t i � EXISTING ADJACENT DOCKi I+ r i + + + + /+ + + + + + + fes` F + ++ ►� f + + + + ,� + + + + + CONSER ATION + + EA MENT + + + r r + + + + + + + +1 + +� + PROPERTY + +� BOUNDARY ++ RIPARIAN LINE RIPARIAN LINE SETBACK PROPOSED 12XI3.5 LIFT 179 T4 PAN GA E:) F:Z I VEE [4larine & Envir�rnrnental Consulting 3S&tExcflamgeAve.SviteB. Naples FL3416d-3732 PROPOSED LINE Elnul: nmaa [urrell-assa�.mrn Phone: {239) G�3-0166 Fay: (234j 6336632 �.. _. ___ . _._ __ VEGETATION LINE MLWL=-0.59' (NAVD 88) MHWL=O.0' (NAVD 88) EXISTING ADJACENT DOCK THESE MkW NGS ARE FOR PERI.I MT * PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR COUSYRI.CTM USE. ALL nATUM S CP MI hl!REON IS REFERENCED Ya Ml -W SURREY COURTESY OF -DAGOSTMG a WOOD, W. - SURVEY DATED: 61-1L17 w APPl1CAW MHEDSI4MWNE WIPPx LF) JZN EXMTWG OVERNekTER STRUCTURE WHPPIISF) 0 wDTH OF VAMRV"Y, 4AFM To i*m jAPPx11. TIDAL DATUM- .+ MLW(NAVDp -G.l?r MHW ONAVDP -4m .� PROPOSED ONERMTER"ItnTURE(A" SF)207 + TOTAL OVERVMTERSTRVCTURE{APPx SFS: my TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHVkt: d0' T'urrcli, Hall &Associates, Inc. SECT ION -B TOVVNSHIP-A&S RANGE -25E F All, N 1 A f.44? h o PARCELS FROM CCPR ,r .• . s Iwa DIMENSION LEGEND' �y 05ulE BION ~ I LENGTH DESCRIPTION ~ PROP RTY f } 0' D" MHWL TO END OF DOCK 4 ►_ _,{ r . . LIME & M1 71' �., DOCK TO MHWL ON OPPOSITE SHORELINE 73'-0" DOCK TO DOCK CONSERVATION 78% MANGROVE PRINCE �o 4 - r EASEMENT MANGROVE FRINGE NOTES: -� t TTIESE DRAMA *;E FOR P9RMITf1NG PURPOSESOALYANO 7 Y - .� - ; + ARE NOTNSHO FUFOROONSTRFEREN ED h ALL t]ATUY SIIOiWlF#REON L5 REFERENCED TO MLW r $URVEY ODLIRTESY OF: -M008t 1D i WOOID. NdC-- - SURVEY oATED Oi-28-17 APPLICAH70Y�NED 5HORELII#VIPP'x .__oj �' EiUSTNGOVERNDITER STi{UOTLIRE {,4ppX moi- nu * WCTH9F 6WERMY, Uh1W iokrdW APP1q: 1aS . r a TIdLL DATUM ARWiH+LW1= -0.W A%WITIAVW +0.p PROPOSED OVERYtlAT'ER STRUCTURE (APPX svj: 2f7 - _ TOTAL DVERV"TER STRUCTURE {AM Sq' 2a'T TOTAL PR0TRLISIUMFRMMM'4- 4w REV PER MTYTurreil, Hall & Associates, -179 TOPNGA Q REV. DENSNMarine & Environmental Cmultng R RtI GIFATED 1,.,5-17 y 3584 Exchange Ave. Suile B. Naples, FL 341 -3732 UVB I TH OF WATERWAY jw N T- o-a�' Emal:[v nrcrell2;socia�esoom PbDbc~(239}643-0166 Fax:(234)643-6632 fETNo oFo7 s. SEGTIQN-fi TQWNSMI P-q8S RANGE -25E i V i NO SEAGRASSES WERE ' g i _ .4 OBSERVED GROWING WITHIN 200 o r - Ge _r 'OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT p i - z SRS TRANSECTS, i o 10 APART i i i � 1 PROPOSED FIXED DOCK i 40� r + PROPERTY LINE CONSERVATION '' • _ EASEMENT Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Marine1 7 9 T (DPA N G A� FZ I \/ E ne & Environmental Consultinngg 3*84FxchangeAve. Suite R. Naples, FL34104-3732 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY Email: nmzahrcrell iso pom Ph,,: (239) 633-0166 Fax: (239)643-W2 — - SECTicw-6 T0WNSHIP-465 RANGE -25E N I .q j' �*r�.� � 5 ';'�[:�+l�t• :;+;r _. •;''. .' •:.� ti's :.=�` •,stf' � _ ` .1 ~•{ sir 'C ! ��1 ���N +• tit �• •f -•' •fie. � � � �_ y- �'�... -� 1 i� I NEpR A Fo � WINEg • ��106 ESA OF pT CO 20 20Of 5f f DN CILLI D R lT A T R� $1 ��� ��A FEET Do LI f ArfLI P o c f r� ��0$6 fop A X19 ��foU o oo co I? of IN 5E 70, 00, 10 OP 4EOcT of L GA a�l� ��vP 3,P D�. 4110 �&- I tip �5f9 tvfO �VANfl, a 6 LZ 01 CO 0� �9T ADD 3 p Do' � tia R coo Tom¢ 0 AiO�f 11 c 14s F y p Ov �FT�o , f��- L` r aPaf 5 ° If- t+° yOte, . P c04VAC �S��F VAeO'to ct' c vlo& �0 epee G° iA B DE APPLICATION PL20170004086 179 ToPANGA DR NAPLES., FL PREPARED BY: TURRELL HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34104 BDE APPLICATION W/ PRIMARY &SECONDARY CRITERIA - 5 10� r c=ft t2v w COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coliiergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION LDC Section 5.03.06 Ch. 3 B. of the Administrative Code THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): Q DOCK EXTENSION [] BOATHOUSE PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): 179 Topanga LLC address: 4261 Brynwood Drive city: Naples state: FL ZIP: 34119 Telephone: Cell: 239-209-3999 Fax: E -Mail Address: Ezio@distinctivedevlopmentgroup.com Name of Applicant/ Agent: Jeff Rogers Firm: Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc Address: 3584 Exchange Ave city. Naples state: FL ZIP: 34104 Telephone. 239-643-0166 Cell: 239-784-0081 Fax: 239-643-6632 E -Mail Address: Jeff@thanaples.com PROPERTY LOCATION Section/Township/Range: 006 /4 25 Property I.D. Number: 74435007507 Subdivision: Southport on the Bay Unit: 1 Lot: 87 Block: Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 179 Topanga Drive Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: Lely Barefoot Beach PUD / single-family residential, duplex residential, etc. BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 8/03/ZU17 Page 1 of 6 i Co County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): The proposed work entails the construction of a new single-family fixed docking facility that is approximately 207 square feet of over water structure with one optional boat lift. The proposed dock will protrude approximately 40 -feet from the most restrictive point into a waterway that is approximately 105 -feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. The applicant is requesting for a 20 -foot extension from the allowed 20 -feet I— SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 105 ft. Measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate N other (specify) Aerial Z. Total Property Water Frontage: 62.94 ft 3. Setbacks: Provided: 16&15 ft. Required: 15 & 15 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 40 ft. 5. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 35 ft. 2. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: There are numerous other docking facilities on Little Hickory Bay and surrounding waterways, all of which protrude approximately 20' to 50' out Into the same waterway 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 024 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes No If yes, please provide copies. 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 6 Zoning Land Use N A -ST Hickory Bay S Lely Barefoot Beach PUD Right-of-way for Topanga Drive E Lely Barefoot Beach PUD Lot 86 (Single-family Residential) W Lely Barefoot Beach PUD Lot 88 (Single-family Residential) DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): The proposed work entails the construction of a new single-family fixed docking facility that is approximately 207 square feet of over water structure with one optional boat lift. The proposed dock will protrude approximately 40 -feet from the most restrictive point into a waterway that is approximately 105 -feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. The applicant is requesting for a 20 -foot extension from the allowed 20 -feet I— SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 105 ft. Measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate N other (specify) Aerial Z. Total Property Water Frontage: 62.94 ft 3. Setbacks: Provided: 16&15 ft. Required: 15 & 15 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 40 ft. 5. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 35 ft. 2. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: There are numerous other docking facilities on Little Hickory Bay and surrounding waterways, all of which protrude approximately 20' to 50' out Into the same waterway 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 024 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes No If yes, please provide copies. 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 6 .5Q er CA)UHty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 6 The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide In the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, It must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the properly. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Response: The total waterfront length for this property is 63 ft. The zoning and upland land use is single family residential which warrants no more than 2 slips per CC -LDC; the current proposed dock design has 1 boat slip. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) Response: See attached survey/drawing illustrating the existing water depths, mangrove/vegetation line which is within the Conservation Easement (CE) located along the subject property shoreline. There are two factors that are the driving force for the required BDE which are the shallow water depths and the mangrove shoreline. The mean high water fine (MHWL) Is the most restrictive point but due to limitation of removing or trimming the mangroves because of the CE and the shallow water depths the dock footprint Is being proposed in the only location that will allow for safe ingress/egress to the proposed slip. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Response: The proposed docking facility will not have adverse impacts on navigation within the adjacent waterway, which is not a marked channel. The proposed docking facility is located within a canal where minimal to no navigation occurs other than local residence. The entire waterway Is used for navigation as there are no navigational markers Indicating the exact thread of navigation. The proposed docking facility provides adequate space for navigation through this waterway and the properties across the waterway already have docking facilities which are not directly across from the proposed dock. This will ensure there will be adequate space for navigation. 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Response: The proposed docking facility protrudes approximately 40 -feet from the MHWL into a waterway that is approximately 105 -feet wide from MHWL to MHWL. This correlates to approximately 38% width of waterway therefore, the dock does not maintain the required percentages based on the criteria. 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not inIsFel with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Response: The proposed dock facility will provide 40 -foot clearance to the neighboring dock to the west and approximately 80 -feet to the neighboring dock to the east. These clearances both provide adequate space for a dock to be built and still provide safe ingress/egress for the typical sized vessels within Little Hickory Bay. A�!4h'co=n2y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 i must be demonstrated.) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) 9/28/2017 Page 4 of 6 Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Response: The proposed docking facility design was mostly driven by the presence of the Conservation Easement (CE) and associated mangrove shoreline vegetation. The CE being located along the entire shoreline is the one special condition other than water depths driving the dock design to protrude out past the mangrove fringe therefore requiring the RIDE approval, 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loadinglunloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Response: The proposed dock facility has been minimized to the fullest extent possible and still provide adequate and safe access to and from the vessel. The proposed docking facility size and design are consistent with the surrounding area. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Response: The proposed docking facility has been designed to only moor one vessel up to 30 -feet which is less than 50% the subject property's linear waterfront footage. 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) Response: The proposed dock facility will provide one baatlift that will not have a major impact on the waterfront view of either neighboring property. The proposed docking facility is consistent with others on this canal and will not affect neighboring properties view of the waterway. S. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (if seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.061 must be demonstrated.) Response: There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200' of the existing dock structure. 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) Response: The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee Protection Requirements. Co er C0101ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2500 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Q Dock Extension ❑ Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Signed and Sealed Survey ❑ ❑ ❑ Chart of Site Waterway Li 1:1 Li Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 1 ❑ ❑ facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 ® ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ® ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please be advised: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all 1 ❑ ❑ materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Fallowing the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 9/28/2017 Page 5 of 6 w Co er C aunty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2900 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-63SB PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: E3 Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Executive Director Meeting Sign -In Sheet Addressing: Annis Moxam Graphics: Beth Yang ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ® Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application ❑ Parks and Recreation: David Berra Meeting Sign -In Sheet ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or ❑ Engineering: Brett Rosenblum EMS: Artie Bay FEE REQUIREMENTS: ❑ Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 ❑ An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having Jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 'G_ � Zb;__ SilnaOre of Pe ' loner or Agent 9/28/2017 Page 6 of 6 LOCATION MAP 0 DRAWINGS STATE C)F FLaRI UA KEY WEST r a• CITY r,~ r-. .-.—%. 2 0 -rte SM ADDRESS: <> 179 TOPANGA DR NAPLES, FL 34134 NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. — LATITUDE: N 26.329154 <> LONGITUDE: W-81.840783 COUNTY AERIAL Turrell, Hall &Associates, 111V. Marine & En�iromnental Consulting 179 T O PA N G A O F� I V E PESIGNEO: JR 1. RMJ 0601.18 JR REV PER COUNTY RAI CRETEo ° 16-17 RMJ 0,-0�,as JR PAGER 11 11 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATION MAP Jos NO.: i"m 4. SHEET NO.: 01 OF 07 s Fanail:tlma�drtlella�aclatesCaID Ph= -(239)6434166 Fax:(239)643-6632 SECTION -8 TOWNSHIP -488 RANGF--25E r# are t LINE PROPERTY LINEI MHWL=0.0' r } (NAND 88) VECETATII LINE CONSERVATION f EASEMENT'' (NAVD 88) / R ,lIF r ' ' � L-1 1 2,0 ¢0 SW 9NTM ME ADDRESS: PROPERTY ' 179 TOPANGA DR BOUNDARY Y NAPLES, FL 34134 ' NOTEB . * THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND - • ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. ALL DATUMSHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW 4 �1 1 SURVEY COURTESY OF, TAGOSTINO& WOOD, INC.' �y *+ s'A SURVEY DATED -47 APPU-� �� • • EXISTIG34 o TOWNED OVERWATEROSTRUCTURE (APPX 09 62 N f Y 'A • l I J• J VNDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW 0")q 708 S7 � ti� N TIDAL DAVM MLW (NAVD)- MHW (NA+e,ee• DESIGNED JR 1. RMJ 05-011-0e JR REV PERGOUI _ ___ Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. 179 T O PA N G A R 1 V E GR ,�; RM; 5-77 i_ t Marine &Environmental Consulting - EXISTINGAERIAL . eey: 02O 3584 E]Cc Ave. Stite B. N les, FL 34104-3732 SHEET ND.: 02 OF 07 15. 1 _ F„wil•mno(dimimllac:rudMnePam PIW11e: 239 J 643-0166 P 9 643 66. 2 �•C) 3 SECTFON-6 TOWNSHIP -485 RANGE -25E 5 m - S � n RIPARIAN scm LINE —� RlFARIAN LINE - SETBACK — _ +lip 4.a, PROPOSED FILED DOCK EXISTIN G ADJACENT DOCK R 2 O 4� + + RIPAFiIAf�l T L11W _ RIPARIAN UNS E7CISTIE#O SETBACK AIDJACENT DOC K 13.S LIFT VEGETATtON + (NAVD 88) 1� LINE CONSERVATION � I p / EASEME N7 Turrell, HaII &Associates, Inc. 17 9 T 0 PA N G A ID FR I V E ( Marine & Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite S. Naples, FL 34104-3732 PROPOSED AERIAL Email: tane@Wn l-umci b.com Phme: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-0632 LINE/ MHWL=0.0' (NAVD 88) --- 1 HESE ORAYNNGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON 18 REFERENCED TO MLW SURVEY COURTESY OF 'DAGOSTING d WOOD, INC' • SURVEY DATED: 07-28.77 • • APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF) 02AN • EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF) 0 WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW(App))- 106' TIDAL DATUM. •• MLW(NAVD)= 4Ar MHW(NAVD)- .0,00' • •• PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 207 TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX Sn. 207 TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL 40' DESIGNED: 1JR SECTION -8 TOWNSHIP -488 RANGES -25E t 8 z n � N S b fo 20 40 RIPARIAN LINE RIPARIAN LINE SETBACK r• PROPOSED , FIXED DOCK f EXISTING # ADJACENT �0 DOCK - o + + + + .F?It RIPARIAN LINE RIPARIAN LINE o SETBACK PROPOSED 12X7 3.5 LIFT VEGETATION LINE - MLWL=-0.59' (NAVD 88) — MHWL=0.0' (NAVD 88) EXISTING ADJACENT DOCK CONSER ATION t + + + Mores: EA M ENT + } } THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE # + + • ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLVV / 4-} } } 4. . SURVEY COURTESY OF-DADOSTINO A WOOD, INC - SURVEYDATED 0721-1T / • + + + + • • APPUCANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF) 6244 } MUSTINO OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF)' 4' � + f VW T DATUM F W WATERWAY. MHW TO MHW (APP)) 0 a. D } •• MLW (NAVD)- -0.68• # I MHW(NAVD). +DAD' • M PROPOSED OVEROYATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 207 PROPERTY ��' r TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF). w TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL' 10' BOUNDARY Turrell Hall &Associates Inc, OE...ED: JR 1. RMJ 06-01.18 JR REV PER COUNTY RAI Marine & Environmental Consulting 179 TO PAN GA DRIVE �Y- RMJ 2 PROPOSED LINE SHEET 1 u ,. 3564 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 341U4 3732 SHEET , 17 OF07 15. �TOdll;ilglA�GII]e1�A890CI8f23.00m Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239)643.932 SECTION -B TOWNSHIP -489 RP.NOE-25E TRANSITION AND FINISH ELEVATION TO BE COORDINATED WITH UPLAND CONTRACTOR CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE PROPERTY LINE 1 MHWL 64' 0 4 8 r6 .iC9 Z9N l 4b' PROTRUSION FROM MHVVIJ PROPERTY LINE �.� .. 26 12' BOAT LIFT 1 PROPOSED FIXED DOCK PROPOSFe) FJXFD - ,� 4 r AC:CFSS''AALKWAY . _ mFIwo:c '88 MLW A-59' (NAW .80) Turrell, Hall 8c Associates, Inc. Marine & En�uvnmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave, Suite B. Naples, FL 34iO4-3732 Rmail: b111aQharellsssuciates,com Phone; (239) 643-0166 Fex; (239) 643fi632 ALL PILES TO BE WRAPPED FROM 6" BELOW SUBSTRATE TO 12" ABOVE MHW oEsicxeo -1 79 T4PA, NGA 0FRIN/E CROSS SECTION SECTION -6 5' TOWNSHIP -48S RANGE -25E I A a � I i 40 80 l�ld iw R✓ 5 Ar • ~�� � j '� � SC7{CE?N fJ�E7 Twill _tea N + 7 - DIMENSION LEGEND ` �t DIMENSION ENGTHDESCRIPTION * ` MHWL TO END OF DOCK PROPERTY +, riNE & MFW' CONSERVATION 71'_0" DOCK TO MHWL ON OPPOSITE SHORELINE 1 73'-0" DOCK TO DOCK 76'-0" MANGROVE FRINGE TO - '• � � -- ;� EASEMENTMANGROVE FRINGE —FF NOTES: • THESE DRAWINGSARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND } lip, ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE, ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW • SURVEY COURTESY OF' "DAGOSMNO A WOOD, INC." SURVEY DATED .' - � ••• 07.2147 APPLICANT OWNED SHOREUNE(APPX LF); 62.04 # ` • EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SFJ: S +• i WDTH OF WATERWAY. MHW TO MNW (APPXJ: 700' r ;Lh - . \ .. TIDAL DATUM t MLW (NA1/D)•FI-0,", MW (6WVDp DAD' • •• PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX $F): 207 .1 TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SFJ: 207 y I. _ i _ - yh I • TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL 20• Turrell Hall & Associates Inc. 7 DESIGNED: JR 1. RMJ 05-2976 JR REV PER COUNTY RAI Marine OL Environmental Consorting 179 T O PA N G A O R I V E O AM' Or. R7M15-77 2. RMJ 07-02-10 JR REV. DIMENSION WDITH OF WATERWAY JOB NO.: 1784 4. 3584 FXc a Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 SHEET NO.: 00 OF W s. _ Emei Um@taael4aasodates.com Phone: (239)643-0166 Fax: (239) 6434632 SECTION -6 TOWNSHIP -485- RANGE- 25E �. dU o < — NO SEAGRASSES WERE /to GROWING WITHIN 200 + q, do +* OF TH ROPOSED PROJECT SRS TRANSECTS, IV APART ►� k PROPO ED # "- FIXED DOCK NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND # ` ALL DATUM NOT SHNDW OWN HEREON IS REFS ION USE RENCEDTO MLW PROPERTY - ': " _ ""+ SURVEY COURTESY OF 'DAG0$TIN0AWOOD•INC--= � �+ _ _SURVEY DATED W.28-77 .94 LICLINE' + �� / LL - .N EXISTINNG OVERWAT R STRUCTUREOWNED SHORELINEP{APPX SF} p ` - • x WIDTH OF WATERWAY MHW TO MHN (APM tow nDAL CONSERVATION — ► *+ DAT i M. (NANAVD) -0,691 EASEMENTPROPOSEDOVERWATERSTRUCTURE(APPXSF) 297 --_- - TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE(APPX SF) - mr / TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL' IS' Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Menne & Environmental ComWdng 179 TO PAN GA E3FR I V E 3584Eac:eAve.Suite B.Naples, FL341043732 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY Email:tm@ftm1lWsea&WSx0m Phan: (239)643-0166 Fax:(239)643.6632 3 SECTION-B TOWNSHIP -48S RANGE -25E PRE -APP MEETING C4er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collierzov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: BDE Date and Time: 11 30 17 3:00PM Assigned Planner: Timothy Finn Engineering Manager (for PPL°s and FP's): Project Information Project Name: 179 Topa PL #: PL20170004086 Property ID #. 74435007507 Current zoning: PUD- Lely Barefoot Beach Project Address: 179 Topan as Dr city: Niles state: FL Zip: 34134 Applicant: Jeff Rogers Agent Name: Jeff Rp ers Phone: 239-643-0166 Agent/Firm Address. THA Naples city. Naples state. FL Zip: 34104 Property Owner. 179 Topanga Drive LLC Please provide the following, if applicable: L Total Acreage: 0.24 H. Proposed # of Residential Units: Ill. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: Iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: v. If there Is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 11/$/2017 Page ( 1 of 5 C(Ar county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application Is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form Is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre -app Note - link Is https://www.coll!eMov.net/tiomelShowDocument?id=75093. Disclaimer., Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 11/8/2017 Page 1 2 of 5 CoSer CA.nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collle ov.net 1239] 252-2400 Meeting Notes Disclaimer- Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data Updated 11/8/2017 Page 1 3 of 5 Residential Boat Dock Extension Checklist FOR REVIEWERS Submerged Resources Survey Checklist 1. Is there an overlay? ST overlay needs an ST permit (much of Isle of Capri & Keewaydin has an ST Overlay over the water) 2. Include an aerial with a note indicating whether seagrass beds exist within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (LDC 5.03.06 J) Provide a submerged resources survey from an Environmental Consultant done between Policy on Requirement for requiring Submerged Resources Survey (October 2017): • Require for all Boat Dock petitions • Always require an aerial with a note indicating whether seagrass beds exist within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. 3. All proposed dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least ten feet from any existing seagrass beds, or meet restrictions for continuous beds. (LDC 5.03.06 J.) P530 4. Provide complete answers to Secondary Criteria #5 & #6. (Use Mise in CV) 5. Demonstrate how negative impacts to seagrass beds and other native shoreline vegetation and hard bottom communities have been minimized. (LDC 5.03.06 J A) P530 6. Provide a clearing plan for removal of any vegetation related to the boat dock. This is simply an information exhibit being requested. 7. Are there any draft restrictions? Look at the MPP. Draft restrictions exist for Wiggins Pass. Keewaydin: BDE not required for Keewaydin - Most always need an ST permit related to a Building Permit— water and land have ST Overlay Seagrass: Light penetration is needed to survive, usually in more shallow areas Submerged Resources Survey: - Read thoroughly - Check location description for street & waterway (if given) Check to see if it was uploaded to CV Indicate in CV "Comments box" if one was done & if it was uploaded to CV *****SEE SUGGESTED FORMAT OF SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY ON NEXT PAGE***** MULTI SLIP DOCKING FACILITY • Look at supplemental criteria in 5.05.02 o Port of the Islands uses different Rating system — see MPP • See 5.03.06 E 11 and 5.05.02 for Manatee awareness requirements for multi-slin dockine facilities Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this LDC. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(I 1) must be demonstrated). SUGGESTED FORMAT AND INFORMATION TO INCLUDE IN SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY Location of survey — property address and folio4 o The survey shall indicate any seagrass or seagrass beds located within 200 feet on any proposed dock facility (5.03.06.J). In order for this to be accomplished, any within 200 feet of the proposed dock (within the riparian lines of the property and adjacent to the property) shall be surveyed. Who did the survey — which firm and their contact information including name, address, phone 4, email What date was the survey conducted? Guidance from PWC is to do between April and October o Weather conditions, water temperature, low tide & high tide times y Objective of Survey & Work done on the site o Was the site snorkeled? o What methodologies were used? o Was a GPS used? o Was an aerial photograph reviewed and used to establish survey transect lines? Results o What was found? Substrate and what kind? Seagrass, shell, oysters? a What was along the shoreline? Mangroves, seawall, etc? o Why does the consultant think no submerged resources were found? o Other observations �- When seagrass is found, include all requirements of LDC section 5.03.06. J. Conclusions o Were any submerged resources found? If yes,; what? o Are any impacts to submerged resources expected or proposed? !� Pictures (suggested angles) 0 1,00king toward and away from the shoreline o The proposed location of the boat access a Observations in the water - Any oyster debris, shell, seagrass r Aerial photograph o Where new docking facilities or boat dock extensions are proposed, the location and presence of seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed dock facility shall be identified on an aerial photograph having a scale of l inch to 200 feet when available from the County, or a scale of 1 inch to 400 feet when such photographs are not available from the County. (LDC 5.03.06.J) o An aerial is required even when seagrasses are not found. The aerial shall indicate whether seagrasses were found within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. 5.03.06. J. (LDC section up to date as of 2016) Protection of seagrass beds. Seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed docks, dock facilities, or boathouses shalt be protected through the following standards. - Where new docking facilities or boat dock extensions are proposed, the location and presence of seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed doek facility shall be identified on an aerial photograph having a scale of 1 inch to 200 feet when available from the County, or a scale of 1 inch to 400 feet when such photographs are not available from the County. The location of seagrass beds shall be verified by the County Manager or designee prior to issuance of any project approval or permit. 2. All proposed dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least 10 feet from any existing seagrass beds, except where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the shore of the property and adjacent to the property, and to minimize negative impacts to seagrasses and other native shoreline, emergent and submerged vegetation, and hard bottom communities. 3. Where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the shore of the property and adjacent to the property, the applicant shall be allowed to build a dock across the seagrass beds, or a docking facility within 10 feet of seagrass beds. Such docking facilities shall comply with the following conditions: a. The dock shall be at a height of at feast 3.5 fleet NGVD. b. The terminal platform area of the dock shall not exceed ISO square feet. c. The access dock shall not exceed a width of 4 feet. d. The access dock and terminal platform shall be sited to impact the smallest area of seagrass beds possible. 4. The petitioner shall be required to demonstrate how negative impacts to seagrass beds and other native shoreline vegetation and hard bottom communities have been minimized prior to any project approval or permit issuance. A�.rCaunty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34144 www.collier¢ov.net (239) 2S2-24©0 P p�plit� I�tiirtg Sign -In Shy Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email D David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net ❑ Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@tolliergov.net Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudineauclair@colliergov.net ❑ Steve Baluch _ Transportation Planning252-2361 stephenbaIuch@colliergov.net El Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463ra mondbellows@collier ov.net El Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 lauriebeard@colliergov.net Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craigbrown@colliergov.net ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 held iashton@collier ov.net ❑ Kay Deselem Zoning Services 252-2586 kaydeselem@colliergov-net G Dale Fey North Collier Fire 597-9227 252-3.037 dfey@northcollierfire.com ericfey@colliergov.net ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning Tim Finn, AICP zoning Division J 252-4312 1 timothyfinn@colliergov.net _l Sue Faulkner _ Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 1 suefaulkner@colliergov.net Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 _ paulafleishman@colliergov.net iJ James French Growth Management Deputy De a_._.l?_rtment Head 252-571.7 - jamesfrench@colliergov.net J Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons@colliergov.r et L i Storm Gewirtx, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 stormgewirtz@coiiiergov.n_et CI Nancy Gund lach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net ❑ Shar Hingson _ Greater Naples Fire District 774-2800 shingson@gnfire.org ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@collierSov.net ❑ Jadi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes@colliergov.net l Alicia Humphries _ Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net f l Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net l John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 johnkelly@tolllergov.net_ _.I Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net __J Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net J Michele Mosca, AJCP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michelemosca@colliergov.net 7 Annis Moxam Addressing 252-551.9 annismoxam@colliergov.net Updated 11/8/2017 Page 14 of 5 A�'.r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.tollier,gov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2440 �] Stefanie Nawrocki Development Review - Zoning 252-2313 stefanienawrocki@colliergov.net Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richardorth@colliergov.net 1 Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@colliergov.net Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net J Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Division 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net J Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com �J Daniel Roman, P.E. Engineering Utilities 252-2538 danielroman@colliergov.net Ll Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager — 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net j James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner jamessabo@colliergo,net 1 Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net 77 Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net rj Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net C7 Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 _ petershawins @coiliergov.net Camden Smith Zoning Division Operations 252-1042 camdensmith@calliergov.net Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-5740 scottstone@collier ov.net L❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC_ - 252-44x6 markstrain@colliergov.net _ (� Mark Templeton landscape Review 252-2475 252-2584 marktempleton@colliergov.net jessicavelasco@colliergov.net Jessica Velasco _ Zoning Division Operations l Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwaish@coiliergov.net 1 David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net 'moi Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 D Christine Willoughby __ _Development Review -Zoning 2525748 christinewilloughby@colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information; Name Representing Phone Email c .c.�� Updated 11/8/2017 Page 1 5 of 5 Co �r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34204 www.colliergov.net (739) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final 5ubatittal Requirement Checklist for: C�KDock Extension Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet, Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Property Ownershi Disclosure Form 2 ❑ R ❑ Signed and Sealed Survey Chart of Site Waterway El Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 1 [] facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from bath an aerial and side view. Affidavit -of Authorization. signed and notarized 2 El Completed Addressing Checklist 2 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please be advised: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all I � [] materials to be submitted electronically in PAF format. ADDITIONAL. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS- a Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. y Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 9/28/2017 Page 5 of 6 A;'r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2490 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: M►rc.7 l kvr-iz — V- 4–�.i pj��.�.ey��v✓w• FEE REQUIREMENTS: _NC Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 I' Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 ,3K An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having Jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, .and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business tenter 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 341004 Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date 9/28/2017 Page 6 of 6 Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet Addressing: Annis Moxam Graphics: Beth Yang ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet ❑ Parks and Recreation: David Berra icy Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart County Attorney's Office: Held! Ashton-Cicko ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Engineering: Brett Rosenblum M►rc.7 l kvr-iz — V- 4–�.i pj��.�.ey��v✓w• FEE REQUIREMENTS: _NC Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 I' Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 ,3K An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having Jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, .and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business tenter 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 341004 Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date 9/28/2017 Page 6 of 6 Ca GMnty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.nex (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6359 DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION LDC Section 5.03.06 Ch. 3 B. of the Administrative Cade THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): ❑ DOCK EXTENSION ❑ BOATHOUSE PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Address: City: State: ZIP: Telephone: Cell: E -Mail Address: Name of Applicant/ Agent: Flrmn Fax - Address: ,City: State: ZIP: Telephone: CeII: Fax: E -Mail Address: PROPERTY LOCATION Section/Township/Range: ___ __J�J Property I.D. Number: Subdivision. Unit: Lot: Block: Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 8/03/2017 Page 1 of 6 A;--Y�cm=k! COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2$00 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergow.net {239] 252-2400 FAX- (239) 2S7-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: ft. Measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate ❑ other (specify) Z. Total Property Water Frontage: ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: ft. Required:._.. ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: ft. 5. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. _ ft. 2. � ft. 6. List any additional clock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are I acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? Acres S. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, please provide copies. 9/28/2417 Page 2 of 6 Zoning Land Use N S E _ W DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: ft. Measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate ❑ other (specify) Z. Total Property Water Frontage: ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: ft. Required:._.. ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: ft. 5. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. _ ft. 2. � ft. 6. List any additional clock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are I acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? Acres S. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, please provide copies. 9/28/2417 Page 2 of 6 k Ca er co>t�nit� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (2391252-2400 FAX. (239) 252.6358 PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5,03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff In determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Nearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MIT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interferewith the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) 9/28/2013 Page 3 of 6 F 5a eT C014ftty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2900 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.061 must be demonstrated.) Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 6.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06_F.31 must be demonstrated.) 9/28/2017 Page 4 of 6 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES. FLORIDA 34104 www.coilieraov.in (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the OT SUM interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION. list the officers and stockholders and the Percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership C. if the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percents a of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 .SAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.coliiemow.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2440 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. list the name of the cn¢ra1 anu/vr 11RNCea hafiRL-rS: Name and Address % of 0 w—n—e r—s h–I D e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE. with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If anv continaencv clause or contract terms invnlvp arirlitinnal nnrtlac lict all inriividiin c nr officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address - J g. Date subject property acquired [] Leased: Term of lease years /months 1f, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 CO&V County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 29M NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliernoy.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-5358 Date of option: Date option terminates: or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disdosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change In ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other Interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County Immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessarysubmittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Date Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Coyer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www. collie rxov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 2S2-2400 FAX 1239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressina@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be sjgned by Adgims1ing personngirior to Iication mMbtin leas® allow 3 da s for proplssing. Not all items will apply to every project Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ Q BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) [] SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) 0 ❑ CamivaYCircus Permit CU ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) (Conditional Use) [] SIP (Site Improvement Pian) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) [] SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ ❑ FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Lire Adjustment) 0 SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change -- Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) j] PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) E] RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description maybe attached) South Port on the Bay Unit One Lot87 6-48-25 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 74435047507 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, IF already assigned) 179 Topanga Drive V LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) 179 TopangaDR PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projectslsites only) SDP-- or AR or PL # Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collieraov. net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: [] Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Jeff Rogers Phone: 239-643-0166 EmalllFax: Jeff@THANaples.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/car Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Divisiop. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Follahlumber 74435007507 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: pate:11 / 2 9 / 17 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. W2017 Page 2 of 2 lier County plan Applir Agent may also send site pions or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. Growth Management Department Zoning Division PL20170004086 PRE -APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Camden Smith, Jessica Velasco STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION a Name and Number of who submitted pil ;uest Name / number / email • Agent to list for PL# Jeff Rogers - Turrell, Hail & Associates, Inc. • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) List individually and by parcel • Confirm Purpose of Pre -App: (Rezone, etc.) BDE ■ Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): Single-family docking facility for one vessel up to 35 -feet in length. Mangrove shoreline with a Conservation Easement overlay which allows for a 4 -foot wide access walkway through. 0 Details about Project (choose type that applies): PUD or PUD -A — is this a phased development and if so what schedule is being proposed? Is the proposal for a specific Tract or addition of a Tract/Use? Variance — What are you seeking a variance of: zoning, primary use, etc.? Provide details. RDE — include any measurements of watercraft (boats), dock extensions measurements from shorelines etc. here and return with a site plan if such exists. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name Title Email Phone Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:�CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zoning Dvisbn - 28DO Ntd h liorseshoe Drive • Naples, Rmda 34104.239-252-2404 • wwwcAagw sd STATE OF FLORIDA N '•�T� WE; ti CITY COLLIER COUNTY SITE ADDRESS: <> 179 TOPANGA DR NAPLES, FL 34134 FT. MYERQ KEY WEST r D, -tr— NOTES• <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURF AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION <> LATITUDE: N 26.329154 <>LONGITUDE: W-81.840783 #;.-: , - — PRpPERTY � •• , _. '1 YA L11"�- NWCa.I„k COUNTY AERIAL Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 7 ®PA N G A R f e/ E z_ Marine &Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. 5uile B. Naples, FL 34I04.3732 LOCATION MAP � t704 _ no.: woFos a SII: hlffe]I .001n PIIOIIe: (239j 643.Oi66 Fax;(239}643 6632 SECTION -6 TOWNSHIP -488 RAN6Er 25E N W 2�} Iq {T4 1to ZZU - o rt . Lu g o $� W RJR co Q�PixO, x z 4 0/oyLU 3 I�y�y m ° Z = PR- RE � s?�5.:Z� z LL CL 3 Lu J mce 1+j..°iIIIIi�� v+ o ,-' W ,, z LLI: �- - 0 zLLI { Er LLI l j 4 Q.. 1 I 3 Z to J IU U �I 0 ®ILU LL z A�e.CL EI ; ` 0 Q m 1 O� �$CL zg O M a f a� n L44 Z rb- W z m a� �m a� a �to z Z 0 LU N V D uia a oLL z Lon, o� aGo �n f# t 4 # .1 + + 0LULuz g g? 1 } + { > J I LLI i 'e Nit h R aq�LL i W J a x Y �WW a02 lza 0 ���.ag 2 Rp 2. ... r Lid f# t 4 # .1 + + # 1 i + f 1 } + { Z -r +h LLI i # . Tf. OS # Z map J t+�`�a}+ IL I + 1S! CD % z W ,� o 2 LL Z 0 Q U ❑Z❑❑11 zOLL, Z0 Q�as FoW�wZ 9 C) Z lil LL m W LD N 111 oOpoo 4©esu m z 0 F W _i 0 Qz LD LLI Zco 0 1L it 0" ro Flu 40 40 Sa rba N it SQ71C2 9N 1y 'wry k T4 F - r IOP OF HAM�. --i—INE & kFtWL--- �� s CONSERVATION •� - EASEMENT ]ROTES: . - • EEMDT MVASNSS ARE FOR PFRMrMNS PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NDED FOR CONTMeTION USE. 1 '� • ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW ` - • SURVEY COURTESY OF "DA40STINO & MOOD, INC.' 1 ` SURVEY DATED. 87.23.17 _ 'a ••� APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE(APPX LFY GZ94 +i EM11NO OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): tl %MDTHOFMATERW1Y, WWTOMHW(APPX): StllP - * TIDAL DATUM: Mi4W� � s � • •' PROPOSED STRUCTURE (APPX SN' 287 TOTAL OVERWATERSTRUCTURE (APPX SF). 287 -_ TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM TOP OF BANK' 43' - Turrell Hall &Associates, Inc. DE816NEb; J0. Marine & Environmental Consuming 79 TO PA N GA ID F,11 ,R;",6tT a \ JO NO.: 7TQ4 4. _ _ 3584 Exchange Ave, Suite B. ]Naples. FL 34104-3732 W D I TH OF WATERWAY sHEEr .• oa or xx a EnEl: Wna@Ilad-aa50Glati,Cmm Phone:(239)643-0166 F=(239)6434@2 SSCTION-6 TOWNSFFlF-48S FLANGE -23E K Lu 9 0 SUBDiVISON INDEX«.a ' a r, rr A �u..�ewonuew+am� a � rwiawrweoen x �n p rumrano.ixe ur.unax+ n Ly : wuixiananrnw.un+we rNn i wmenia txi w.�rrr a ii 05066 + wua+e.+m�x+.n n+r�A a10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A PAGE OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS REFERRED TO AND ADOPTED BY REFERENCE BY ORDINANCE NO. 04-41 OF THE BY CHAIRMAN COUNTY OF COLLIER, FLORIDA, ADOPTED JUNE u, 2004, AS AMENDED BY THE ZONING NOTES AND SUBDIVISION INDEX REFERENCED HEREON, ATTEST CLERK 3 g +pl. 3 pp �����1���i�� ■■ d�I3yyII���SB�IMM COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DNISKNJ && '�f ; ! f ijj � iq � �f �f����f f6Rf `�f rr ���ff � e$�- f�g � fgf f >Efg X433 a �•° f � ff � t� TwP 498 RNCi 25E SEC(S) B Na ill ��Iqq-aiiIi�9S�aR..iiioao.Iti-§iFi:7C.--iii.$c9i=-Si2SSiYSIffi3i?SSIig�'d`r MAP NUMBER: ..w...as=eapedseYGrlli6S0EpRiltllitillFRR118sCOtlt00f>ytmCCisf6lt[aC7iSi00lR�kRXREkkllifOiStC�Sf;pAiR1ARSEEi>�t%lCt�c$s �� N . 8506N Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary el No. 74435007507 Site Adr. 179 TOPANGA DR, BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 Name / Address 179 TOPANGA LLC 4261 BRYNWOOD DRIVE City NAPLES State FL Zip 34119-8415 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A06 636400 873A06 6 48 25 0.24 Legal SOUTHPORT ON THE BAY UNIT ONE LOT 87 Millage Area O 3 Millaae�0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 636400 - SOUTHPORT ON THE BAY UNIT 1 School Other Total Use Code 0 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5,122 5 10.9604 Latest Sales History (Not all Safes are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 01/27/17 5358 -LM $ 725,000 07/24/15 5180-3777 $ 625,000 08/28/14 5074-1871 $ 567,500 05/05/09 4453-2723 $ 510,000 06/25/07 4249-281 $ 81,000 03/11/05 3750-3308 $ 950,000 12/19/03 3468-1348 $ 800,000 02/06/03 3213-1028 $ 0 03/26/01 2795-2939 $ 256,700 02/22/00 2643-1760 $ 279,000 04/11/97 2303-2808 $ 160,000 06/01/90 1533-1755 $ 125,000 2017 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 593,620 {) Improved Value $ 0 (-) Market Value $ 593,620 {-} 10% Cap $ 9,550 Assessed Value $ 584,070 m School Taxable Value $ 593,620 (=) Taxable Value $ S84,070 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No. 74435007507 Site Adr. 179 TOPANGA DR, BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 Name / Address 179 TOPANGA LLC. 4261 BRYNWOOD DRIVE City NAPLES Tax Issuer Permit # Yr Land # Calc Code 10 RESIDENTIAL FF State FL Zip 34119-8415 Permits CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type Building/Extra Features Units it Year Description Area Adj 80.42 Built Area Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No. 74435007507 Site Adr. 179 TOPANGA DR, BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134 Open -GIS in a New Window with More Features. PAO Township Range Section: 48 TOWNSHIP 48 SECTION 06 RANGE 25 T_R_S 482506 Zoning -General: PUD ZONING FUD ZON£NOTF1 PDA -86-17C, 8/2/88 PDA -88-7 88-63, 5-24-94 PUD -77-19(6) 94-28, 6-26- 01 PUDA-0I-AR-546 01-35 ZONF,NOTE2 ZoningLinks: Z.oning_url More info TSS 48-25-26 PAO Parcels: 74435007507 FLN 74435007507 RFCKEY 74435007507 STRAP 636400 873A06 Occupancy Category 2: 151 WindZone 161 Category 2 Commissoner District: Andy Solis, Esq. MSTRICT 2 COMMSNR Andy Solis, Esq. Planned Unit Development: LELY BAREFOOT BEACH NAME LELY BAREFOOT BEACH STATII ACTIVE I'F'ITrJ0N R-77-19 SE'S I'l)I) NU AR -6283 AKA 01M NUM 06-22 CU"5" 12,70,76 BD 67 V to rrrr■ rrrrr• rrr_wra�+rRr arww■ rw�rr��rro■ rasrr w nwr ■r■ B 'BRAC LS -3 TRACT LS4 TRACT LS -2 8 BONITA BEACH 8 � 1 D6 BDA 2 7 s e �? 3 B 8 A BDA DIS 13 6'4k BDO sa �0 89 D" 91 eat 87 gi DB5 B4 82 92 D� D53 ?*OPA NG A D9- 93 79 78 BO W 94 7; BD 36 Other Bb's on Topanga Drive 38. 5-21-98 BD -98-18 98-17 53. 12-2-99 BD -99-25 99-44 65. 3-1-01 BD -00-35 01-05 74.12-5-02 BD -02 -AR -2948 02-08 116.10-17-17 BD -PL -16-3559 HEX 17-28 5.03.06 - Dock Facilities A. Generally. Docks and the like are primarily intended to adequately secure moored vessels and provide safe access for routine maintenance and use, while minimally impacting navigation within any adjacent navigable channel, the use of the waterway, the use of neighboring docks, the native marine habitat, manatees, and the view of the waterway by the neighboring property owners. B. Allowable uses. The following uses maybe permitted on waterfront property: Individual or multiple private docks. 2. Mooring pilings. 3. Davits or lifts. 4. Boathouses . 5. Boat lift canopies. C. Measurement of dock protrusions and extensions. 1. Measurement is made from the most restrictive of the following: property line, bulkhead line , shoreline, seawall, rip -rap line, control elevation contour, or mean high water line (MHWL). 2. On manmade waterways less than 100 feet in width, where the actual waterway has receded from the platted waterfront property line, the County Manager or Designee may approve an administrative variance allowing measurement of the protrusion from the existing MHWL, provided that: a. A signed, seated survey no more than 60 days old is provided showing the location of the MHWL on either side of the waterway at the site, as well as any dock facilities on the subject property and the property directly across the waterway; and b. At least 50°% of the true waterway width, as depicted by the survey, is maintained for navigability. 3. On manmade canals 60 feet or less in width, which are not reinforced by a vertical seawall or bulkhead, at least 33 percent of the true waterway width, as depicted by the survey, must be maintained for navigability. 4. The allowable protrusion of the facility into the waterway shall be based on the percentages described in subsection 5.03.06(E)(2) of this LDC as applied to the true waterway width, as depicted by the survey, and not the platted canal width. D. Determination as principal or accessory use. 1. On unbridged barrier islands, a boat dock shall be considered a permitted principal use ; however, a dock shalt not, in any way, constitute a use or structure which permits, requires, and/or provides for any accessory uses and/or structures . 2. Boathouses and dock facilities proposed on residentially zoned properties, as defined in section 2.02,02 of this LDC, shall be considered an accessory use or structure. 3. Any covered structure erected on a private boat dock shall be considered an accessory use , and shall also be required to be approved through the procedures and criteria of subsections 5.03.06(G) and 5.03.06(1=) of this LDC. E. Standards for dock facilities. The following criteria apply to dock facilities and boathouses , with the exception of dock facilities and boathouses on manmade lakes and other manmade bodies of water under private control. 1. For lots on a canal or waterway that is 100 feet or greater in width, no boathouse or dock facilitylboat combination shall protrude more than 20 feet into the waterway (i.e. the total protrusion of the dock facility plus the total protrusion of the moored vessel). 2. For lots on a canal or waterway that is less than 100 feet in width, dock facilities may occupy no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway or protrude greater than 20 feet into the waterway, whichever is less. 3. On manmade canals 60 feet or less in width, which are not reinforced by a vertical seawall or bulkhead, mock facilities may protrude up to 33 percent of the width of the waterway, provided that the procedures outlined in section 5.03.06(C) are followed. 4. For lots on unbridged barrier islands located within state aquatic preserves, protrusion limits, setbacks , and deck area shall be determined by the applicable Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) regulations in effect at the time of permit application, and the protrusion limits above shall not apply. All required DEP permits for a dock facility must be obtained prior to the issuance of a Collier County building permit for the facility. 5. All dock facilities on lots with water frontage of 60 feet or greater shall have a side setback requirement of 15 feet, except as provided in subsections 5.03.06(E) or 5.03.06(F) of this LDC or as exempted below. 6. All dock facilities, except boathouses , on lots with less than 60 feet of water frontage shall have a side setback requirement of 7.5 feet. 7. All dock facilities, except boathouses , on lots at the end or side end of a canal or waterway shall have a side setback requirement of 7.5 feet as measured from the side lot line or riparian line, whichever is appropriate. 8. Riparian lines for lots at the end or side end of a waterway with a regular shoreline shall be established by a line extending from the corner of an end lot and side end lot into the waterway bisecting equidistantly the angle created by the 2 intersecting lots . 9. Riparian lines for all other lots shall be established by generally accepted methods, taking into consideration the configuration of the shoreline , and allowing for the equitable apportionment of riparian rights. Such methods include, but are not limited to, lines drawn perpendicular to the shoreline for regular (linear) shorelines , or lines drawn perpendicular to the centerline (thread) of the waterway, perpendicular to the line of deep water (line of navigability or edge of navigable channel), as appropriate, for irregular shorelines . 10. All dock facilities, regardless of length and/or protrusion, shall have reflectors and house numbers, no less than 4 inches in height, installed at the outermost end on both sides. For multi- family developments , the house number requirement is waived. 11. Mu&slip docking facilities with 10 or more slips will be reviewed for consistency with the Manatee Protection Plan ("MPP") adopted by the BCC and approved by the DEP. If the location of the proposed development is consistent with the MPP, then the developer shall submit a "Manatee Awareness and Protection Plan," which shall address, but not be limited to, the following categories: a. Education and public awareness. b. Posting and maintaining manatee awareness signs. 12. Information on the type and destination of boat traffic that will be generated from the facility. 13. Monitoring and maintenance of water quality to comply with state standards. 14. Marking of navigational channels, as maybe required. F Standards forboathouses. Boathouses , including any roofed structure built on dock , shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission according to the following criteria, all of which must be met in order for the Planning Commission to approve the request: 1. Minimum side setback requirement: Fifteen feet. 2. Maximum protrusion into waterway: Twenty-five percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less. The roof alone may overhang no more than 3 feet into the waterway beyond the maximum protrusion and/or side setbacks . 3. Maximum height: Fifteen feet as measured from the top of the seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive, to the peak or highest elevation of the roof. 4. Maximum number of boathouses or covered structures per site: One. 5. All boathouses and covered structures shall be completely open on all 4 sides. 6. Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on the principal structure or may be of a palm frond "chickee" style. A single-family dwelling unit must be constructed on the subject lot prior to, or simultaneously with, the construction of any boathouse or covered dock structure . 7. The boathouse or covered structure must be so located as to minimize the impact on the view of the adjacent neighbors to the greatest extent practical. G. Standards for boat lift canopies. 1. Boat lift canopies shall be permitted over an existing boat lift attached to a dock legally permitted, by the requisite local, state and federal agencies, if the following criteria are met. a. Canopy covers shall not extend more than 27 inches beyond the width of the boat lift on each side. b. The length of the boat lift canopy shall not exceed 35 feet. c. The height of the boat lift canopy shall not exceed 12 feet, measured from the highest point of the canopy to the height of the dock walkway. d. The sides of the canopy cover shall remain open on all sides, except that a drop curtain, not to exceed 18 inches shall be permitted on the sides. e. Boat lift canopies shall meet the requirements of Awnings and Canopies in the Florida Building Code. f. Canopy cover material shall be limited to beige, or mid-range shades of blue or green. g. No boatlift canopies shall be permitted at sites that contain either a boathouse or a covered structure. 2. Lots with frontage on canals shall be permitted a maximum of one boatlift canopy per site. Lots with frontage on bays shall be permitted a maximum of 2 boatlift canopies per site. 3. If an applicant wishes to construct a boat lift canopy that does not meet the standards of subsection 5.03.06 G_ above, then a petition for a boat lift canopy deviation may be made to the Planning Commission which shall review a sufficient petition application and either approve or deny the request. H. Dock facility extension. Additional protrusion of a dock facility into any tvatenvay beyond the limits established in LDC subsection 5.03.06 E. may be considered appropriate under certain circumstances. In order for the Planning Commission to approve the boat dock extension request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, have been met. These criteria are as follows: Primary Criteria: a. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than 2 slips; typical multi -family use should be 1 slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks , additional slips may be appropriate). b. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension). c. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charter) navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel). d. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50% of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages). e. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks . (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks ). 2. Secondary criteria: a. Whether there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least 1 special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds). b. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading and/or unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area). c. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained). d. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner). e. Whether seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (if seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(H)(2). of this LDC must be demonstrated). f. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(i 1) of this LDC. (if applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated). g. If deemed necessary based upon review of the above criteria, the Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the approval of an extension request that it deems necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Code and to protect the safety and welfare of the public. Such conditions may include, but shall not be limited to, greater side setback(s) , and provision of light(s), additional reflectors, or reflectors larger than four (4) inches. Procedures for approval ofdocks, deck facllldes,andboafhouses. 1. The Administrative Code shall establish the procedures and submittal requirements for the issuance of permits for docks, dock facilities , and boathouses . Notice procedures are provided in LDC section 10.03.06. 2. All dock facilities are subject to, and shall comply with, all federal and state requirements and permits, including, but not limited, to the requirements and permits of the DEP, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 3. Nonresidential dock facilities shall be subject to all of the provisions of LDC section 5.03.06, with the exception that protrusions for nonresidential dock facilities beyond the specified limits shall be determined administratively by the County Manager or designee at the time of site development plan review, based on an evaluation of the criteria in LDC subsection 5.03.06 H. Protection of seagrass beds. Seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed docks , dock facilities, or boathouses shall be protected through the following standards: 1. Where new docking facilities or boat dock extensions are proposed, the location and presence of seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed dock facility shall be identified on an aerial photograph having a scale of 1 inch to 200 feet when available from the County, or a scale of 1 inch to 400 feet when such photographs are not available from the County. The location of seagrass beds shall be verified by the County Manager or designee prior to issuance of any project approval or permit. 2. All proposed dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least 10 feet from any existing seagrass beds, except where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the shore of the property and adjacent to the property, and to minimize negative impacts to seagrasses and other native shoreline, emergent and submerged vegetation, and hard bottom communities. 3. Where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the shore of the property and adjacent to the property, the applicant shall be allowed to build a dock across the seagrass beds, or a docking facility within 10 feet of seagrass beds. Such docking facilities shall comply with the following conditions: a. The dock shall be at a height of at least 2.2 feet NAVD. b. The terminal platform area of the dock shall not exceed 160 square feet. c. The access dock shall not exceed a width of 4 feet. d. The access dock and terminal platform shall be sited to impact the smallest area of seagrass beds possible. 4. The petitioner shall be required to demonstrate how negative impacts to seagrass beds and other native shoreline vegetation and hard bottom communities have been minimized prior to any project approval or permit issuance. (Ord. No. 46-63, § 3.CC; Ord. No. 13-56, § 3.N; Ord. No. I6-27, § 3.0) AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) .!s) (Pant name), as Ownersaws U-0 (title. under Gem, that l am the{ ) a applicant (company., if lam). r or of m iw�and that: 1. I h*" Mauthority to Semm the SOVIIIIl(s) rraqueWed and to Impose a eerrant and reshriotions on tkabon ! the ae a Moult of any ae tlon apppoved by tiro Cou* in WWdenoe with thie 2 All answoars 10 the DMftb�� �' at�cdled hereto and esSmada h We ikon std any akelmhes. daft or 0th W suPp� utter 3. l have � ofthla applk�tiorl ani honest and true; f" 00 PILIM0119 Of aufortaed fire aW of Collier Cqunty to enter ml)m the property dwing normal WOWIM hours 4. The property tilt! be � � uaft i� request made throw this �, and that � . � vWM sold or strdivided sut>jert to the cpndttlana and 5. Waif authotks WW matters mgBramg this pelftlon kwiudin f 1 through � ab - to ad as ourhnY mpresentWve ove. r��e t is a etaupsohretiorr, If" It is Mu* mcacut+adby rhe pro • l40cabY be 0ce � e a +car any [t~�C� or�„red c ,y or V. ren to � d4W by It CanWny's ` bn � • • d ft *Pfi sant is a6 Herr a ParbW can stn on halPoff fha perf mit Gffi* named pW'fan ttre Pn*W )NOW nW sign and to MsnMsd as file °g$nara! rf SYMUstkWuds Nm karse's name and Me wO * %a In xs Eben daftnnm ft tear's a ea, lrtcflnirrtu� �, fuer use ihs pIAW %rpt for urar � ► pr and Her UIQ' panonkg SLiedury,declare "M I have Asad the foreo ft Aflldarolt of Authhorhatfnn and Neat the fordo truL llilgnagrrs tz-06—LD 6 "? Oelbe STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Th® h*umwt vme Worn to (or afliml@O and srr� beftS me on r la +fit (dit) by (nwne of parson providkQ osih or sfi'gMgbn), as (type Qf idarltidcation) as id�vtho is Personally known to 48WRre410foRbUy who has produces staeaP Public CPM-COA-Mrisuss M30444 V'fuin FrilnCo * F = CQ41Ifl61$SION #FF913514 EI[PIR AvVM 27, "19 Nr1HWAARONNOTAR'1,( M PROPERTY OWNERSHIP Disclosure Form Sha�dd X31 d"tMM of ownarttp or duve es in omntracts for punt dKe Of OWE, but prior to the sure of the final publk haari the subsequent � i Of the OWksM or half, on his be, to submk a P.WtmW tal ire of formes Of the Mom UW IUwadioXN 1f may. fOa AmMe by an MpMa& Umney by the en*** � M""'n, or lnt tenanry, Ist ag Purtles with an sena In � of � °a1°"ip I as well as the I' lf ft Pn;PwW is UVOW bY a list the�s and the Mned lav eaehw _ O�EGer$ PM 't the G P � b In the name of a � list the benack of the trust w th the r of WA aoj7- pe i ata GOLLM ta011fm eovwVpMW 4UM NOM NOMBUM OM GRom0184MUM NAPUX RONDA 34M tZW2UFAX P # d. W th@ PrOMW Is In the r9arres of a §ENEW Or l,M#PIrD P sr iro list dWgame of the T cr a PsMershil 6 It to rH vm ofthe corn S2 �s below, ina9�, or pomws.. NOM-ImAdm 96 olt i�wareib omofCmbvo.. any WWMWW dam or =&ad terms in,,,Ww wW tbml Pam, list all IndMduab or UTM a IO, or trust: l • DOW stet PrOP" a901med 1:1 Lomook Tiw,e ofhm" /ems If, POtl"O"w has Option to boy, Indicate the llollovAng: r BawgpW 7 Pale 2 of 3 epi Gmwth mumpWan DepwUnat �beaii`'�ad tOC A' TW, l dlaaa; G flier .nW Noeth Harsnhn #give /007) ti4al)hm FL 84M Quoted 9 17 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST • .Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-24W FAX (239) 252.-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD Addressing@colliergov_net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form ust a signed b Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting. please allow 3 days for processin . Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIR (insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplaited) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ® VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description maybe attached) South Port on the Bay Unit One Lct87 6-48-25 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 74435007507 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 179 Topanga Drive LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of projectlaite in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (Wapplicable) 179 Topanga- PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP-- or AR or PL # Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 w Co Yer Coanty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2440 FAX {239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: ff] Email Applicant Name. Jeff Rogers Phone: 239-643-0166 ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Email/Fax: Jeff@THANaples.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 74435007507 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: 11129/17 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 61912017 Page 2 of 2 PROOF OF OWNERSHIP WARRANTY DEED INSTR 4506493 OR 4633 PG 2766 RECORDED 12/16/2010 4:01 PM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DOC@.70 E99,400.00 REC $18.50 CONS $14,200,000.00 Consideration: $14,200,000.00 Documentary Stamps: $99,400.00 Recording Fee: $18.50 P Michael D. Gentile, Esq. Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC 4001 Tamlami Trail North Suite 250 Naples, FL 34103 File Number: Fiore Pam[ Identification No. 02930360009 Space Above TM! Lina For Recording Data] Warranty Deed MAnMRY FORi4I • GTlON (89.02, F.s.) This Indenture made this -Lq— day F, Gasper V. Fiore and Joan 1VL Fiore, husband and wife, whose post offic s is 4540 Gordo Naples, FL 34102 of the COnnty of Collier, State of Florida, grantor*, d D. Berry, as Trustee th Paiko Trust dated June 4, 2010** whose post office address is P.O. x 1 'M41�gr�t Witnesseth that said grantor, fo an a NO1100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable con i ti s sad d 'd grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has gran , the i and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described l ,tuate, lying and bean - Co er , Florida, to -wit: Lots 23, 24, 25 and the No feet of Lot 26, BI " class Cove Section of Port Royal, as described in the P of recorded in Plat Page 101, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; and 39 and 0 feet of Lot 39, Block "A"', Beach Estates No. 2, as describe lr corded in Plat Book 1, Page 69, Public Records of Collier County, Flan . Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements common to the subdivision, if any, and taxes subsequent to 2010. **with fall power and authority to protect, to conserve, to sell, to lease, to encumber, or otherwise to manage and dispose of the real property described herein and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. "Ormtor" and "Crrantee" ars used for singular or plural, a context requires. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year fust above written. Double7imam *** OR 4633 PG 2767 *** I Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: (Signature of fitness # 1) Print Name: (Signature of Witness #2) Print Name: L5_ C/ State of�' s County of QA N OV -04 - The foregoing instrument was ac Joan M. Fiore, who are pe known or L) licenses as identification. [Notary Seal] O r. a,01 0 N Pc1�l �� Zvi Ags o � M4 -0-IC16 C (seal) aspen V. Fiare 2010 by Gasper V. Fiore and drive's ,n t Name: C•A r My Commission Expires: S•a —�o WarraWDeed pjawioryFvmq - PP%c 2 DoubleTimeo SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY FABRIZI RESIDENCE 179 TOPANGA DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34134 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JANUARY 2018 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B NAnzs, FL 34104 FABRizi RESIDENCE SUEMIERGED REsouRCE SURvEy JANUARY I2, 2018 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Fabrizi residence and associated proposed docking facility is located at 179 Topanga Drive, identified by Parcel Number 74435007507. The property is located off Topanga Drive just south of Bonita Beach Road, bound to the west by a single-family residential lot, bound to the east by another single-family residential residence, and bound to the north by Little Hickory Bay. The property is located in Section 06, Township 48 South, and Range 25 East. The upland portion of the property is a single-family residence currently under construction. Turrell, Hall & Associates was contracted to provide environmental permitting services and one aspect is the associated Submerged Resource Survey (SRS). This survey will provide planning and review assistance to both owners and agency reviewers in regards to proposed project. The proposed project consists of constructing a single-family dock within a man -altered waterway off Little Hickory Bay. The SRS survey was conducted on January 11, 2015. Moderate south winds, mostly clear skies, and a high tide resulted in visible access to the entire project area. Surface water conditions on this day were calm which also helped to provide fair environmental conditions for the survey. The water temperature was 68°F. Low tide occurred at 4:21 A.M (-0.1') and high tide occurred at 11:39 P.M (1.5') on the date of the survey. 2.0 OBjECTiw The objective of the Submerged Resource Survey was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within the limits of the proposed dock project or within 200 -feet of the project area. The survey provided onsite environmental information to help determine if the proposed project would impact any existing submerged resources and if so would assist in reconfiguring the proposed dock in order to minimize any impacts. If seagrasses are present within the project area it needs to be determined if the seagrass beds are small in size or if they are part of a large seagrass bed. The general scope of work performed at the site is summarized below_ • Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel conducted a site visit and I snorkeled these transects within the proposed project basin and verified the location of any submerged resources. • Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel identified submerged resources at the site, estimated the % of coverage, and delineated the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed. • Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel delineated limits via a handheld GPS (Garmin Model 76csx). Page 1 of 5 FASRizi REsrDENCE SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JANUARY 12, 2018 3.0 METHODOLOGY Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover the entire property shoreline for the proposed dock installation. The components for this survey included: • Review of aerial photography of survey area • Establish survey transects lines overlaid onto aerials • Physically swim transects, GPS locate limits of submerged resources, and determine approximate percent of coverage • Document and photograph all findings The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transects spaced approximately 10 -feet apart within the proposed dock footprint as shown on the attached exhibit. The survey was expanded out 200 -feet from the proposed docking facility in order to verify no other resources were within the surrounding waterway. The neighboring properties have existing docks which helped to provide easily identifiable reference markers, such as dock piles which assisted in locating transects and keeping them consistent throughout most of the survey area. One biologist walked/swam these transects using snorkel equipment where needed within the surveyed area. The other individual assisted with compiling notes and documenting findings on aerials. Located submerged resources were photographed, the approximate percent of coverage was quantified, and the location was delineated on an aerial photo as well as confirmed via handheld GPS (Garmin Model 72H). The biologists used a half meter square quadrant further broken into sections by cordage to make coverage estimates easier. 4.0 RESULTS The substrate found within the surveyed area included two distinct classifications; silt sand with shell debris and just silt/ muck material scattered throughout. These two substrates were found scattered throughout the entire surveyed area. There was also scattered oyster debris along the property shoreline within the mangrove roots. The shoreline consisted of red mangroves and scattered rip -rap both of which provide habitat for numerous fish, crabs, barnacles, and oysters growing on and around the mangrove roots. The majority of the survey area exhibited a silt/muck bottom that was devoid of any aquatic vegetation growth or any types of submerged resources. The lack of any submerged resources is most likely due to the overall water quality within Little Hickory Bay as well as the water clarity not allowing much sunlight penetration. This was most evident in the deeper water depths. Page 2 of 5 FABRIzi REsiDENCE SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JnUAtY 12, 2018 Various filamentous algae and macro algae were observed and documented growing along the bottom sediments throughout the survey area. Also observed were numerous fish species during the survey and a list of these species has been prepared and is provided below as Table 1. Table 1 — Observed Fish Species Common Name Scientific Name mangrove snapper Lu Janus griseus sheepshead Archosargus prohatocephalus striped mullet Mugil cephalus snook Centrompus undecimalls jack crevalle Caranx hippos 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The submerged resource survey was completed for the entire subject property shoreline and expanded out 200 -feet from the project area which yielded few findings. Barnacles were observed growing on the mangrove roots and existing dock piles on the adjacent properties. The subject property shoreline consists of mangroves which provide natural cover. This mangrove area was where all the observed fish species were located including: Gray Snapper (Lutjanus griseus), Sheepshead (Archosargus probatocephalus), Stripped Mullet (Mugil cephalus), and a few Common Snooks (Centropomus undecimahs). Negative impacts to submerged resources are not expected with the proposed docking facility installation. Page 3 of 5 FABRIZI RESIDENCE SuDmmRGED RESOURCE SURVEY JANUARY 12, 2018 Bouam Sediment aiong mangrove shoreline, muck with. shell & oyster debris Muck with Shell & oyster debris Page 4 of 5 FABRIZI RESIDENCE SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY JANUARY 12, 2018 Oyster sheii & debns along shoreline Page 5 of 5 14?# � � d N 9 v, I rz&22: (P) czars G NaM'JOT 141.92' (M) NO -3-21'42T 1461 (p) 1' 3� m rnl[nii� #^mi� ! ,gyp• V +' Ui+� m 1 z„coCh 14?# � � d N 9 v, I rz&22: (P) czars G NaM'JOT 141.92' (M) NO -3-21'42T 1461 (p) rMwo s. o.easn,n rw .,mo.c r=a uw� rw In:,oaxw rwary ,:nn, iloha>io�9��Yigd axras. Naex � l®u na�a,v..�anw mr.e s.�.f • ws. a. um x.,s+ex anxn: m" xv� 1f.11�� n�iexe�..am x.. a�sayca�s m rmlw'r�. eac rtaeaa� n�i iww,o uwnr ar.e 170F 1 1' ! 1 z„coCh ti v N. 0 0 M r 4 a t0 a o' ,Q v w rMwo s. o.easn,n rw .,mo.c r=a uw� rw In:,oaxw rwary ,:nn, iloha>io�9��Yigd axras. Naex � l®u na�a,v..�anw mr.e s.�.f • ws. a. um x.,s+ex anxn: m" xv� 1f.11�� n�iexe�..am x.. a�sayca�s m rmlw'r�. eac rtaeaa� n�i iww,o uwnr ar.e 170F 1 RECORDED EASEMENT INFORMATION �A 01434683 me soy 29 PH 2 59 DC"R )COWINERVATION EASBMCNT'RDEU STATE of FLORIDA ) 5S. SEC 1_OUNTY OF COLLIER ) PR)J? As boc :.& [WOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that for and in consideration IKT�cf issuance of State of Florida Department of Environmental INDRegulation Permits Numbered 111501035 and 111703805 In the name ofC3 SOUTHPORT VENTURE ASSOCIATES, a general partnership and other good y and valuable considerations, the receipt of which is herebycD cn acknowledged, SOUTHPORT VENTURE ASSOCIATES, a general partnership, o ti 1"Grantor") has bargained, sold, conveyed and granted to the STATE �n nC FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION {"Grantee"), 7451 roll Course Boulevard, Punta Gorda, Florida 33950-9359, a non- exclusive conservation easement in accordance with Section 704.06, Florida Statues (1905), in and over the real property located in Collier County, Florida and described on the attached Exhibit "A". I. This Easement conveys to Grantee a perpetual non-exclusive interest in the property, consisting of the following affirmative and negative covenants on the part of the Grantor and Grantor's successors and assigns: a. No construction or placing of buildings, roads, signs c billboards or other :dvarti es or other structures co any kind whatsoever on a the property shall bww undertaken without p w tee• b.No d acing of her substance whatsoever or placing of trash, a unsightly or offensive mat i the property. c. N re a ction of native t as, nruns, or Wither veget tion n rope u d. N exc vatian, dre o removal of loam, at, gravel, soil, roc or r t n as t affect the surfs a on e r y e. o an ac use xc pt fo t rmi th land or water axe n p nes tl a natu 1 on Tie on the property• it"" f- tivities detrimental to Gina f control, water man , water conservation, ester qua i erosion control, So ervation or fish or w e bi servation on the pro g. No a or see detrimental tc such 9 of land or water area on t1 tr.-- h. Grantor a �4iEa� 11 maintain the lescribed real props a on. of 2 Provided, however, ement shall not preclude $ the following specific activities from being undertaken on the 4+ subject property as authorized pursuant to the above referenced Permits Numbered 111501035 and 111703005- 94 P; � a. The placement, construction and maintenance of ramps and ,e'., walkways for access and single family boat docks for property .o owners and associations of such property owners within the Southport on the Bay subdivision, provided such access ramps or i*Mm walkways do not exceed 4' in width. .0 b. Maintenance of mangroves located adjacent to residential mN " lots within Southport on the Bay Subdivision provided such 'sp mangroves may not be trimmed to a height of less than ten {10) Jnr feet. �LmTm E0 C. Grantor retains and preserves the use of the property for any and all purposes which do not interfere with and prevent the x.+w� Hees herein granted to the Grantee. n0 f 575 110099It OR BOOR PAGE 3. in the event of violation of any covenant contained in this Conservation Basement, Grantee shall be entitled to pursue all available legal and equitable remedies, including injunction. 4. Grantee may, in its sole discretion, transfer its rights +ander this Easement to such other state or local agency or to a private or public organization provided same is dedicated to the conservation and preservation of land in its natural state. It is understood that the granting of this Conservation %asement entitles the Grantee or its authorized representatives to enter the above described land in a reasonable manner and at reasonable times to assure compliance. The Grantor on behalf of itself and its successors or assigns hereby agrees to bear all costs and liability relating to the operation and maintenance of the land subject to this conservation Basement in the natural vegetative and hydrologic condition existing at the time of execution of this Conservation Easement, including the maintenance of enhanced or created wetlands in the vegetative and hydrologic condi wired by the aforementioned permit, and Grantor doe r i and hold harmless the Grantee from same. C t n hereby granted and the obligation t e i e land forever predominantly in a and ition as herein specified shal n the land and sha ing upon the Grantor and a ssore and assigns, and nare to the benefit of t G e and its successors and a gas. The tos a enforced the available r enforceme a the Seco d J enforceme t ac entitled to trial an a the land existing to the aforementi other reme 403, Florid Any for rights in the provisions of construed to be event of any sub in and hydrologic e wits- These remedi or penalty which may rvation as nt may be i and of r a propriate is that v nae or such n the C- wit ourt of da. In any X is a ee all be ' f s d ate in the o t c t storing and to i{ edition on behalf of the G the failure ^f Gra'. haervation Easement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 'MM Conservation Easement on the Itnessness o -o a meat or tion req by the re i ad to any ppl' ab r Chapter r� a O eraise its to c y with the e deemed or reunder comply. in the :Ao6e execute this Grant of above written. Grantor: SOUTHPORT VENTURE ASSOCIATES, a New jersey general partnership By= Orion Marketing, Inc.. a general artner By' 4W 1 Kennet Glu :%man, -Its Presi n�+t�+ Received ,.� s+�7-—i?:c.; l- :.a.yS;ar p �:ir R xe;-nd S COL ER % L' 8Y. �. no 1515 000995 OR BOOK PAGE STATE OF FLORIDA � ) SS. COUNTY OF COLLIER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Kenneth J. Gluckman, as President of Orion MarketingInc., a general partner of Southport Venture Associates this 41? day -of lUD&A67104AL -' 1990. my CoNjujawwifest =MR 1if11' BGZERAi W.1ha, Notary Public Accepted: STATE OF COUNTY OF The My Commis This Instrument Prepared Byl George L_ Consoer, Jr., Esq. HUMPHREY & KNOTT, P.A. 1625 Hendry Street Fort Wyers, Florida 33901 , 1990 1990 me by .a 28tb nNXSI? eAa Legal boseriptiaa of Coaasrvatioa Eaaansnt All of that aartaie propartr deelgnated as Conservation Easement Area (c.r.) open the plat of foutbport on the ray. Reit one, as recorded at plat Sock ti, pages 31 - 331 and the plat of Southport on the lar, Unit Im, a■ recorded at Mat Sock 16, pagan 1011 - 101p beth raeorded in the Public Records of Collier Coaaty, Florida. IF" a xt is most �. IF IF f IF wtgm cum .� M • 4 -r* f018, she hiswE s a f 11- bid � ds General and � ON ME DAY rmM9 '!Y 011NM ASMIATLON, INC., herein joints >taforced to as Granters, and � 00 in shy 99MU@@, Whose a�e Is 40 TrLfth INC., BeatLn h forred ss tai X301, Naples, i►lorida 33940. Grantors, for and in consideration of the paYmest of Ten t$ig.00) Dollazs and other good and valuable consideration do grahereby grant, sell, and convey easemeete�overa upon, and successors asd assigns, a perpetual across the following described propertYs Legal DescriptOf ion enttprr�Aty described on tioattachei he easement, the and orpriiv re leges granted herein a specifically 1. , easeslent, leges granted herein are non-exclusive, and G retain serve all rights to convey other rights easements to other persons as Grantors may deem p ided, er, that such subsequent conveyan os tibl th the purposes Of this easement. n n 2. The ens erty owners i s granted herein shall be solely the benefit f ropof Southport on the ea it 1 and U 2 or the purpose of providing pedestr as to the nd walkway located within the conservat Bement area in Southport on the gay, unit 1 and unit 2 ion. ZC ;. Grantee shall have the right to use so much of the above described property as may be reasonably necessary to construct and install within the right-of-wthisgraGrantee, anted. hereby e facilities and structures contemplated by located upon at its sale cost, shall maintain the improvements constructed ated upon the easement and those improvements tent with this Basement. ,V 4eantee acknowledges that a portion of the present serves as a drainage easement as depicted upon the plat MW C" o� g� port an the Say, unit I and as such no use of the 4 property by Grantee or Grantee's successors or assigns shall be incompatible with the purposes of such easement. * u n the successors and °C �: 5. This Easement shall be binding upon all as o�c + assigns of all parties herein and shall be enforceable by ' jmll}: said parties. deceived ocume.gary Stamp Tax 6 y$« Class C' Irlan&iGit * deceived 3personal ProaerlY lax ;,OLLIER COUP Y CLERK OF COURTS D G dY 1 _ » '. :n:+xa-�- - - -s&B'OOK 7w.. rNaomi U . , � and � *�� O~ ft" em"t , "t Grantors hand 9 sosena�, and Dettvarad #4 Qit�r �E Grantors BownapRT Vorm AS$OCtAme a New Jersey Cenral Partnership• Hy$ Orion Harketln9p t1c.0, a General partner By $ THs HAY PROPERTY ATIOn, INC. MATa Cw VIOUM 88 MR t as Pxesiden y Vag ;r. *6 PanethJ ,� t of OriOn lnge lue' a J- G 'U as Genera Partne of Southport Venture Associates this &42 day of .1991. otary Public gip NY COMMISSI08 EM?. AUG.10,1993 BONDED TNRN WERAL INS. M. Winted now • Y. 2 This instrument Prepared By$ coot" L. Dote Jr P�. Aa6 1625 Hendry Street, S; rortM"WS, Florida 3 (913) 234-2722 atksowIn d beforeb7t, INC., this 1991. tary MY J?Mqosi= 4"Ifes 9 oolm Printed NOW 3 =K.11 SOWS IAlG OR 80OX PACE 4m;AWNSULTAIM ilde f Bonn theswT That 12 foot wide drainage easement lying 6 feet an each side of the line common to Lots 58 and 59 of "southport On The Day, Unit Ona", a subdivision recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages 51 through 33 of the Public Reoords of collier County, plorida and that part of the Lake 7 drainage easement of said subdivision more particularly described as followsz Beginning at the northerly most corner Of said Lot 59 run 6.00 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the southeast on the boundary of said Lot 59 having a radius of 850.40 feet, a central angle of 00024016" and a chord of 6.00 feet, bearing 8291122 P 14 "W; thence p60925138"H 99.10 feet to the northwesterly line of said drainage easementl thence p449141 said line 16.09 feet to the Mean High Water Line of ay; thence along said line 877°16030"8 11.42 fe nae 3°ffi 41.79 feed thence S6702013698 30.51 f e$y thence SS 108 14.98 feat the westerly boundary i id Lot 5 hence along said l ine 32.42 feet along a onca e o the southeast having a radio of 850.0 f a al n le of 02 11 08 and a chord of 32.42 feet, be r g pa t of Beginning. The above descri a a i 2611` square feet of Land basad an the ation an Mean High water Line in September 1988. 0?ya n �J 00ASTAL $ raffr mG i'1'S, I C ka-�Richmond, P.L.B. MI ERCONTY,'r COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAFO Flc�id3 Certificate No. 4116 AMESC.GILES.CLERK c:.c. i+i14e xa.1MMl C%88076-Is.t s' Exhibit "A" 3106 $ HORSESHORE DR. - NAPLM FLORIDA 33942 • (813) 643-2324 - FA%(813) 643-1143 PROOF OF NOTIFICATION TO THE CONSERVANCY b 4i A W v b 4i A TURRELL MALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MmuNE & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 3584 Exchange Avenue • Naples, Florida 34104-3732 • 239-643-0166 • Fax (239) 643-6632 * Tuna@THAnaples.com June 6, 2018 Conservancy of Southwest Florida 1495 Smith Preserve Way Naples, FL 34102 RE: Collier County Boat Dock Extension PL20170004086 179 Topanga Drive To Whom It May Concern, Based on the Settlement Agreement between Collier County and the Conservancy of Southwest Florida, we are required to notify you of the proposed docking facility located at 179 Topanga Drive, Folio # 74435007507. The proposed project is currently in for a Collier County Boat Dock Extension due to the proposed dock being waterward of the allowed 20 -foot protrusion measurement. The project consist of constructing a new docking facility through the existing mangrove shoreline that is also a conservation easement (CE). The proposed dock includes a 4 -foot wide access walkway through the mangroves, which is allowed per the CE language and then expands out to 6 -foot wide approximately 18 -feet waterward of the mean high water line (MHWL). The total dock protrusion is 40 -feet from the MHWL and will be approximately 207 square feet of overwater structure. Please see attached exhibits. According to the Agreement if written objections have not been received within 15 days of this submittal approval is presumed. Re ands, � 4 -- Jeff Rogers Project Manager Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. STATE OF FLORIDA N ciTY COLLIER COUNTY SITE ADDRESS: <> 179 TOPANGA DR NAPLES, FL 34134 �UFTMYERQS KEY WEST p of ."e" NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURF AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION <> LATITUDE: N 26.329154 <> LONGITUDE: W-81.840783 SUBJECT r•- �J PROPERTY i S h`Nlgpov Ya,v ��•a�w,'YRn' RnNUMRRILI x.IAINY+Cow.ev — �,iNXN1ld1 vS �. C. VICINITY MAP COUNTY AERIAL Turrell Hall & AssocAates �Ilc.179 1 79 T4 PAN �A OEBk�lEO: JR F� I V E : RM;�17 �. 'RMI OSO,•18 JR REV PER COUNTY RAI Marine &F t Environmental Consulting REo a 3584 Exchange Ave. suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATE ON MAP NO,; 0 of m s i3n1811; loos®4irtell�ssocisoes,com Phone: {239) 643-0166 Fax: {239) 643-6632 fET I _ I SIECTION-B TOWNSH[P- 468 RANGE- 25E F ' '� ✓ t EXISTINGI A ADJACENT . RIPALINE ' EX1S"1NO y411E "'- DOCK ,4DJA ENT •� 19 RIPARIAN ° i0 80 A � 4 LINE _c 2N Tr' C PROPERTY- _ •' MHWL=0.0' Z �' (NAND 88) - ' VC-TATION i LINE ,1 CONSERVATION., ..... , �* EASEMENT , , }, r y y(NAVD 88)'. *F•%''�. T V Alp �' • +, b `! . SITE ADDRESS: PROPERTY t y 179 TOPANGA DR BOUNDARY NAPLES, FL 34134 NOTES. ? - . THESE DRAVWNGS ARE FORPFRWITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. _ r,ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW k } , y . SURVEY COURTESYOF; '7MGOSTINO i WOOD. INC." SURVEY DATED: 07.70.17 . - �� • • APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 07.2I '" ,� { ^ -d • EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SFj 0 5r � �r.yd. T N WIDTH OF V ATERWAY, MHW 70 MHW _ _'� (APPX): 106' _ TIDAL DATUM; MLW (NAVDr -0.61r DEMNEM JR y, RMA p5 -01-10I JR REVPERCOUNTYRM Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc, 179 O PA N GA ®F2 l y\/ E R7UJ a = Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 EXISTING AERIAL JeoHe�TD�.: 1".4 8meil-.t=@tu(rtill-assoclWsmm Phme: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION -6 TOWNB}{IP-a6S R4NGr=-25E �tl 4094 E io fo 20RIPARIAN + � S'C7fL.�'7N�'.F7 _ I RV E yA ... ,'� a RIPARIAN DINE:- SETBACK' FtIP;4# IAN LINE PROPOSI;� — _ _ _ "Rl ARIAN LINE EXISTING w, _FIXED DOCK SETBACK{ ADJACENT EXISTING —1 ;ADJACENT * -_ ....._ .. . DOCK PROPOSED �' _ 2J{13.5 LIFT or VEMLVYLm-0.59' VEGETATION (I+#A\I'D 88) LINE i�ROPERTY w LINEI - - I MHWL=OA' (NAVD 88) ' ONSERVATION �� NOTES: ISEMENT - THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW * 40 SURVEY COURTESY OR 'TAOOSTINO8WOOD, We" • •• SURVEY DATED, OT-2MT APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): W94 f / f 4 ' ` • - EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX aF): 0 a '* _ » WIDTH OF I WVTERWAY, MHW TO 011W (APPX): 700' - i • TIDAL DATUM: opMLW(NAVD)= 4.09' MHW(NAVD)= 40.00' ' • PROPOSED OVATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 207 } �+ TOTAL Or STRUCTURE OM SF): 20T TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHVJL: 40' .'. _�. J' Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. — - Marine & Environmental Consulting -17 9 -r 0 Fll /k N G ® F:?,' 1 \/ a 3584ExehaageAve. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 PROPOSED AERIAL Email: hma@Wu&-awiaU L m Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax; (Z39) 643.6632 0 SECTION -6 TOWNSHIP -48S RANGE -25E N Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. .1 -7 9 TO PAN GA E:) RI 'i/' aDRAWN DESIGNED: JR 1� � ' RMJ 2. Marine & Environmental Consulting ulrl S C _ 0 40 20fJ PROPOSED LINE JOB NO.: 6, SHEETNO.: 060E 07 04O 5. _ E95ir: dID @@yell-assDd7f snm Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643.5632 0 RIPARIAN ®` scarce �Nx r LINE 15, RIPARIAN LINE SETBACK —� 61 � PROPOSED - FIXED DOCK 13.6, RIPARIAN 15' Y� LINE '`— RIPARIAN LINE SETBACK PROPOSED 12X13 5 LIFT EXISTING i � +� O - 0j ..- I ADJACENT 4 DOCK F ? i VEGETATION LINE /+ y . MLWL=-0.59' (NAVD 88) V, - - 1 ' MHWL=0.0' 1 + _- (NAVD 88) - CONSER ATI0 .• 4r . F`' EA MENT ' I y PROPERTY BOUNDARY � EXISTING ADJACENT DOCK • THESE DRAVWNW ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE, • ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW • SURVEY COURTESY OF: 'M"OSTINO a WOOD, INC • SURVEY DATED' 97-71.17 • • APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APP)( LP): 55.96 • ExISTFNO OVERWATER STRUCTURE WPX SF): 0 • VNDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW JAPM: 1051 TIDAL DATUM: •• MLW (NAVD)= -0m • MHW (NAVD)• •0.90' • PROPOSED OVERVVATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 297 TOTAL OVERVATER STRUCTURE (APPx SP): 707 TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 40' Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. .1 -7 9 TO PAN GA E:) RI 'i/' aDRAWN DESIGNED: JR 1-RNU p6 -0i -1B JR REV PFR COUNTY RM � ' RMJ 2. Marine & Environmental Consulting C _ 3584 Exch Ave. Suite B. Naples, AL 34104.3732 PROPOSED LINE JOB NO.: 6, SHEETNO.: 060E 07 04O 5. _ E95ir: dID @@yell-assDd7f snm Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643.5632 SECTION -B TOWNSHIP -488 RANGE_ 25 E CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE E 0 4 8 S'C7f1'Z:'9N7:E2:'7 I�PROPERTY LINE 1 MHWL Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. 64' 40' PROTRUSION FROM RAL-11L1150—m- 26' PROPERTY26' 12' BOAT LIFT PROPOSED FIXED DOCK TRANSITION AND !+ f--.- PR , ;3 FINISH ELEVATION BE COORDINATED ` WITH UPLAND I I CONTRACTOR MHWO.0 as f� MLW 4.59' (NAVp'88) ALL PILES TO BE WRAPPED A- FROM 6" BELOW SUBSTRATE TO 12" ABOVE MHW 179 T® PAN GA ®F:;Z I ®/ E Marine &Environmental Consulting 3584 Ex Naples FI 34104-3732 CROSS SECTION Email: Gma@Wm1I- wift mn Phone: (234) 643.0166 tzar: (139) 643-6632 JR N0.: iTBa q, _ 4NEETNO.: 0.50E p7 5. SECTION -6 '1^ ]ESIGNEfl: 7. RMJ 0641-76 JR RE4 pER COUNTY RAI :REATEOt 17-1+17 S. _ I110 -19 TOWNSHIP -466 RANGE -26E �r 4: �✓ f 14 z V{�4. '� •' }� Nom` ." �-. � .� .-'`i �• Q 4Q SQ {SQ ` ,;! .scarce mgr ['� til ff�� �j Pri ii -z 11'1 ^Y ��� �. S �•= f FROM C 1CEL 9 { a + + F 4- .: DIMENSION LEGEND DIMENSION i LENGTH DESCRIPTION 40'-0" MHWL TO END OF DOCK o PROPER TI ^ - DOCK TO MHWL ON OPPOSITE 4 SINE & PAHWL / 71'-0° SHORELINE 3' .s•. +T 1 73'-0" DOCK TO DOCK CONSERVATION MANGROVE FRINGE TO 78 -D MANGROVE FRINGE EASEMENT K k t �. • �'1ti ti x o�• r i r �, NOTES: -. - +� i. i�� • THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND - •> `' ',' h s, rY M1 't,. } _ �. .,' ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE, _ i ALL DATUM SHONM HEREON IS REFERENCED To MLW ,4iy`'♦ V. A TCrosy,_ �t .. �f t! r}. • SURVEY COURTESY OF 'bAOOSTIN06 WOOD, INC.' t� `K SURVEY DATED: �.. - t _ M-26.17 � - } •APPLICANT OWNEDSHORTIINE (APPX LF): 62.1 •�.;`,'� ri %.+. � ra �� R -. �„� ss � DCISTNGOVERWAT'ERSTRUCTURE (APPXSF): o �A. . 1�t 1' �; F-•I�# . �� • TIDAL DATUM: WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APP))- 163' -,�. �� �' - ar •.• MLW(NAVDP- ':a, `,y - w MHWMAVD)' +3.6• Al �� � � �� - - ' - w • PROPOSED OVERWATER 8mc' URE �: 207 Al. ��' 7e-� .,- �' `T . TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SPj: S 467 '''P' c ah•�Tr- d`t ��, `"'i i`; •� �,.• • TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL' 1S' I �" � 1 � -.: ' . V .• . •rT �— DESIGNED: JR 1MJ . RJR REV PER COUNTY RAI tTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc, 1 7 g -' O P AN GA F� 1 V E o R+�s, a Marine & Environmental Consulting 3584Exchange Ave, Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 WD I TH OF WATERWAY allEST NO.: 100 OF or s. Email: nma@ftIkssocWa.wm Phone; (239)643-0166 Fax:(239)643.6632 SECTION -6 TOWNSHIP -48S RANGE -26E ~+' - NO SEAGRASSES WERE OBSERVED GROWING WITHIN 200 •� ""OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT 3 - PROPOS EM 0 3Q 60 SC.�iC2:9N'FEi'7 ' SIBS TRANSE TS, 10' APART 16 FIXED DOCK' L _ NOTES: F THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND a 46 - i ARE NOT INTENDED POR OONSTRUCTION USE. PROPERTY a 4_ • ALL DATUM SHOVM HEREON IS REFERENCED TO NLW • SURVEY COURTESY OF: .=+ r SURVEY DATED: LINE r � � APPLICANT owNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): ..- • - + a WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MH(APPX): P u- 1 4.a .* • TIDAL DATUM: CONSERVATION --- •• MLW(NAVD)= i ifr MNW (NAVDp EASEMENT' PROPOSED OVERWATER BTRUOTURE 1APPX SF): M - .. �- - - -. • TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): w I ; TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: Turrell Hall & Associates Inc. mEm. Marine & nviraamental Consulting 1 7 J T4P^N C3^ ID F Z 1 \/ E3594'ExchangeAve.SuiteB. Naples, FL 341(14-3732 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY 14 W(: tmR@ m1kwCialE&= Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION -8 TOWNSHIP- 485 RANGE -25E