Loading...
PARAB Minutes 05/09/2018MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF TTM, PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD North Collier Regional Park Naples, Florida May 9,2018 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at2:00 P.M. at North Collier Regional Park, Naples, FL, with the following members present: VICE-CHAIRMAN: Mr. Phil Brougham Ms. Mary Bills, Advisory Board Member Mr. John Fuchs, Advisory Board Member Ms. Rebecca Gibson-Laemel, Advisory Board Member Mr. Murdo Smith, Advisory Board Member ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Steve Carnell, Department Head, Public Services Department Mr. Barry Williams, Division Director, Parks and Recreation Ms. Jeanine McPherson, Assistant Director, Parks and Recreation Miguel Rojas, Jr., Administrative Assistant, Parks and Recreation Mr. Dane Atkinson, Project Manager, Facilities Management Ms. Felicia Kirby, Parks and Recreation Mr. Oliver Tindale, Oliver Tindale & Associates Ms. Paula DiGrigoli, Director, Safe & Healthy Children's Coalition of Collier County Mr. Michael Garito, Board Member, Bristol Pines Homeowner Association Page 1 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) I. CalI to Order Vice-Chairman Brougham called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. II. Pledge of Allegiance and Moment of Silence The Pledge of Allegiance was recited and a moment of silence observed. III. Approval of Agenda A change in the order of agenda items was suggested, as follows; Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Manatee Park, Swim Central Program, TDC Grant application, dual purpose tennis courts, North Naples park request. Ms. Bills entered a motion to approve the change in the order of agenda topics of discussion, Mr. Smith seconded the motion. All were infavor. The motion was carried IV. Approval of April 18,2018 Minutes Correction to April I 8, 2018 minutes; Ms. Bills was not present at this meeting. Ms. Gibson-Laemel entered a motion to approve the April 18, 2018 minutes with the noted conection to the record Mr. Brougham seconded the motion. All were infavor. The motion was carried V. Capital Projects Update - Mr. Williams a. Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park: Work continues towards completion of 60Yo design. Mr. Williams provided a copy of the concept Master Plan of the park to PARAB members for their review. Question (Mr. Brougham): Does the design include the floor plan for the community center? Will there be an opportunity for questions, cofirnents, and suggestions on the design? Answer: Yes, the present floor plan design is included and further input was encouraged. Question (Mr. Smith): Has any progress been made with regard to Phase II of this project? Is there anything to report in terms of design? Answer: Yes, a selection committee has ranked contractor candidates, ultimately selecting Q Grady Minor & Associates. Presentation of this selection was made to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) for their review, with approval given to commence contract negotiations with this firm. Presentation of the negotiated contract is anticipated to be made to the BOCC in June/July 2018 for final approval. Phase II of the Regional Park will be fuither addressed during presentation of the Parks Master Plan agenda item. Mr. Brougham requested a more focused floor plan showing specific locations of rooms, such as game rooms, craft rooms, and fitness center. Page 2 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) Mr. Williams stated that befter definition of space within the community center will need \r to be done, with the fitness center planned for Phase II of the park proj ect. Ms. McPherson added that discussion remains ongoing with regard to the size ofthe fitness center, as well as the overall feasibility ofincluding one, given the availability ofa fitness center at Max Haas Park. Staffwill continue to provide updates and solicit PARAB feedback during the design process. Question (Ms. Gibson-Laemel): Regarding the capital project referencing Vanderbilt repair showers and fumiture, and Vanderbilt restroom expansion, is this at Vanderbilt Beach? Answer: Yes, this project is located at Vanderbilt Beach and specifically involves replacement of the boardwalk and foot showers, as well as installation of Mobi-Mat, a semi-rigid ground surface reinforcement for wheelchair, stroller, and pedestrian beach access. The Vanderbilt restroom project has been completed and this action item will be removed from the list of active capital projects. Question (Mr. Smith): How far will the Mobi-Mat extend out from the boardwalk; will it extend to the shoreline? Answer: The MobiMat is conceptually planned to extend 10 feet out from the boardwalk by the cabana stand, turning right/westward and staying on dry sand approximately 75 feet. Question (Mr. Smith): Will this cause any issues for sea turtle nesting? Answer: lnstallation of the Mobi-Mat requires FDEP permitting, which would take this\/ into consideration. Provisions which would need to be made dtiring installation are unknown at this time. Further, allowance for beach raking of this area will also need to be taken into account. b. Eagle Lakes Pool: Work continues on this project, with anticipated completion in June 2018. c. East Naples Community Park: An additional 10 pickleball courts were installed at the Park, funded by the Tourist Development Council (TDC). The courts were completed on time and were available for use during the very successful U.S. Open Pickleball Championship in April 2018. The Parkisnowhometo 54 courts in total, one of the largest pickleball facilities in the State of Florida. VI. New Business a. Manatee Park - Steve Carnell Mr. Camell summarized the discussion had at the previous PARAB meeting in regard to the concept of coJocating parks and housing, which was one of 27 ideas chosen by the BOCC following multiple discussions on ways to address the identified need for additional affordable housing options in the county. Following a review of county owned lands, two sites were selected; Bembridge PUD and Manatee Park. Page 3 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) These two sites were presented to the BOCC at the December 2017 meeting, who voted to defer action on this item until Fall2018, allowing for additional information to be obtained. A Request for Information was initiated to gauge developer interest and to solicit ideas and broad concepts, with responses received from ten separate developers. Mr. Carnell stated that the plan at the present time is to invite developers to partner with the county in developing these locations and ultimately presenting a Request for Proposal document to the BOCC in October 2018; however, Mr. Carnell expressed a desire to first present this information to PARAB, prior to BOCC presentation. Further, a joint meeting between PARAB and the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC) was suggested for September 2018, at which time both committees could review and discuss the document. Mr. Camell stated that if the BOCC were to issue direction on this item in October 2018, there still remains much dialogue and discussion to be had prior to final adoption. Mr. Brougham requested that PARAB be given an itemized list of action items and associated timeline of the RFP process prior to September 2018. Mr. Brougham was in favor of the suggestion of a joint meeting between PARAB and AHAC, and suggested that the number of participants be limited to a smaller group for discussion of concepts, limitations, and expectations which should be included in the RFP. The difficulties of conducting meetings over the summer were discussed, when committee members and seasonal residents may not be available to participate in discussions. Mr. Camell suggested a possible subcommittee be appointed by both PARAB and AHAC, who would meet together and then report back to their respective Boards over the summer for further discussion and approval of ideas and recommendations. Ms. Gibson-Laemel suggested the subcommittee be comprised of more than2 or 3 members of each committee in order to allow for more viewpoints. Question (Mr. Smith): The Master Plan draft includes the development of Manatee Community Park, which was just approved by PARAB at this meeting. How is that consistent with the present discussion about a plan to move forward with an RFP? Answer: From the Master PIan standpoint, the intent was to continue to promote Manatee Park on the plan; however, the variation of how it might be developed has yet to be determined. Mr. Brougham volunteered to represent PARAB on the subcommittee, with additional member participation based on their availability over the summer. Mr. Brougham suggested that the first meeting be held in June in order to begin discussions sooner than later. Mr. Carnell stated that he must first present the subcommittee concept to AHAC in the first week of June. In summary, Ms. Bills expressed her opposition to any form of housing being constructed at Manatee Park. While sympathizing with the need for affordable housing in Collier County, Ms. Bills stated there is a mandate to provide recreational facilities as well, and the local residents were promised a park and have a right to that park. Page 4 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) Mr. Fuchs stated he was not in favor ofany parks being converted to include any types of housing. Mr. Smith also voiced his opposition to "giving away" park land, which could never be gotten back. Mr. Smith suggested that the Parks Division work with Affordable Housing, to be given park land elsewhere in the county. Ms. Gibson-Laemel was also opposed to conversion of Manatee Park to accommodate affordable housing. She stated that Manatee Park had been promised, it exists, and has been included in the Master Plan; however, that now appears to be changing. Mr, Brougham entered a motion to estsblish a subcommittee to work with the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee in order toform conceptual ideas and parameters prior to Requeslfor Proposal presenldlion to the Board of County Commissioners in October 2018. Ms. Bills seconded the motion. All members were in favor. The motion was carried- b. Swim Central Program - Ms. Paula DiGrigoli Ms. DiGrigoli, Director of the Safe & Healthy Children's Coalition of Collier County addressed PARAB to discuss this organization, whose mission is to improve health outcomes and prevent injuries among children (0-18 years ofage) within Collier County. Ms. DiGrigoli specifically addressed the high incidence ofdrowning among children ages 1-4 in the State of Florida. In March 2012, The NCH Safe & Healthy Children's Coaiition, in partnership with the Early Leaming Coalition of SW Florida, Collier County Parks and Recreation, Greater Naples YMCA and City of Naples fuver Park Aquatic Center launched the highly successful SWIM Central program. Based on national and local drowning statistics, the program was designed to target children ages 3-5 years, attending the social-economically disadvantaged daycares and preschools. The program is supervised by professional aquatic directors and staffed with qualified instructors and lifeguards. SWIM Central provides a session of ten, 30-minute lessons over a 2-week period during the school day. After an initiai evaluation, the children are split into groups and work individually to develop water safety skills at their own pace. At the end ofthe session, the children are re-evaluated, having been taught life saving skills. The program is funded by Naples Children and Education Foundation and serves various sites throughout the county, and will be offered at the Eagle Lakes Aquatic Facility upon completion of that facility. The program is planned to be expanded to include children of high school age as well. Ms. McPherson added that the Swim Central Program was instrumental in assisting the Parks and Recreation Division achieve the Guinness Book of World Record for holding the largest swim lesson class in the world in 2014. The Coalition compensates the Parks Division $40 per child for offering the swim lessons, having netted the county $70K+ to date. Question (Ms. Gibson-Laemel): Are the children taken by bus to and from the pool facility? Page 5 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) Answer: Yes, the children are taken by bus to and from the pool facility during the school day, with 1 instructor per 6 students and 3 instructors in the pool at a time. Children on the pool deck are also given instructions on water safety while they wait for their turn for pool time. Ms. McPherson announced an upcoming fundraising event planned for February 2019 at North Collier Regional Park, which will be held in partnership with the Coalition, with a focus on water safety. Ms. Gibson-Laemel stated her support for this program, having formerly been involved with a similar program in Texas. (Mr. Smith): Is there a mom and toddler swim lesson program? Answer: Yes, the Parks and Recreation Division presently offers "Baby and Me" swim classes. Question (Mr. Smith): How may PARAB assist the Coalition is getting more children to learn how to swim? Answer: One issue involves pool access, although the addition of the pool at Eagle Lakes Park will be of great assistance. Another issue is the need for qualified lifeguards, with the current rate of pay being a significant issue. Lifeguards are first responders and pay should be commensurate with the level of responsibility required of the job. c. TDC Grant Applications - Mr. Williams/lVls. Kirby Six Tourist Development Council (TDC) grant applications were shared with PARAB for v review and approval, which included a request for funding for a parking garage at Clam Pass Park; an appropriation to begin the process of considering the concept. Staff is aware that any development or improvements at Clam Pass must first be given approval by the Pelican Bay Foundation. Question (Mr. Smith): Is a new playground being installed at Tiger Tail Beach? Answer: Yes, the playground is approximately 12 years old and a request for replacement of the playground has been received. The work is expected to take 12 to 18 months to complete, so Staff is seeking to appropriate funding for the project at this time. Question (Mr. Smith): The grant request states the project is to begin in October 2018. Would it be possible to start the project off-season? Answer: Yes, the project would be started Summer 2019. Question (Mr. Brougham): With regard to the Clam Pass parking garage concept, have there been any public meetings held on this topic? Answer: In January, beach access was a topic of discussion by the BOCC, who requested that the Parks Division give consideration of the parking garage concept as part of the Parks Master Plan. Focus group meetings were held to discuss beach access, with the potential parking garage discussed atthattime as well. Page 6 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) A public meeting was also recently held to discuss the same issues, although specific \-/ neighborhood meetings have not taken place. The grant application is for a request of TDC funding ofthe parking garage project, at which point public vetting would take place. If funds were appropriated for this concept, neighborhood meetings would be held in order for Staff to relay intended plans for the project. Mr. Brougham pointed out that the Parks Master Plan draft addresses beach park access and indicates that based on the available data it appears that the number of available parking spaces is greater than average needs in recent years. Ms. McPherson stated that this information is being rewritten, as the data received by the consultant was incomplete and referenced available spaces during the summer, and not during season. Mr. Brougham empathized with the adjacent neighborhoods and suggested greater public input. Question (Mr. Brougham): What specifically would the $200K grant funding that is being requested ofthe TDC be used for? Answer: The funds would be used to hire an engineering firm to begin a site development plan and concepts, followed by public vetting ofthese concepts, in coordination with the Pelican Bay Foundation, from whom approval would be required. The design would be done in consideration ofthe available space, environmental concems, as well as the development of an acceptable design esthetic. Question (Mr. Smith): A conceptual design for the parking garage has already been created, but has this been presented to the Pelican Bay Foundation or the residents, prior to Staff spending an additional $200K to hire an engineering firm? Answer: Mr. Williams stated that the pursuit of fund appropriation coincides with the initiation of conversation with Pelican Bay Foundation. A conceptual design was created to share with PARAB, the TDC, and the Pelican Bay Foundation in order to be used as a visual aide for the purposes ofthe discussion. If approval for the project is given, next steps would be taken. If approval was not given for advancement ofthe project, the money would be placed in reserves. Further, if the Foundation had concerns or stipulations regarding design, these would be addressed throughout the design process by the engineering firm. Mr, Brougham entered a molion to approve Tourist Development Council grant fun ding app lic ation s for : 1, Barefoot Beach Preserve Park Boardwalk Enhancements in lhe amount of $300,000. 2. Barefoot Beach Preseme Park Roadway and Parking Lot Improvements in the amount of $350,000. 3. Clam Pass Beach Park Improvements in the amount of $1.1 million. 4. Tigertail Beach Park Playground Replacement in the amount of $200,000. 5. Vanderbilt Beach Park Boardwalk Improvements to include ADA accessible viewing Platform in the amount of $360,000. Ms. Bills seconded the motion. OO r";:r:{r*r. The motion was carried 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) Discussion continued with regard to the timing of the grant funding request for the Clam Pass parking garage in association with public vetting on this topic. Mr. Williams stated the first step would be to seek the appropriation of these funds. The next step would be to begin discussions with the Pelican Bay Foundation, potentially with inclusion of the conceptual design as a visual aide for the purposes of the discussion. The result of these conversations may be an outright rejection of the project by the Foundation, or a request for more information, at which point an engineering firm would be chosen to flesh out the design. Public vetting would be part of this process. If the project does not move forward, the $200K in TDC grant funds would be placed back in reserves to be used at a later date. Ms. Bills inquired as to why the project could not be discussed with Pelican Bay Foundation prior to the grant request in order to gauge interest. Mr. Williams stated that approval by PARAB and the BOCC would be required, as well as having available funding of the project prior to presentation to the Foundation or discussions with local residents. Mr. Camell stated that beach access will be part of the discussion during the Master Plan presentation to the BOCC on May 22,2018. The BOCC has previously directed the Parks Division to investigate the possibility of construction of a parking garage as a possible solution to the beach access issue. Following an extended discussion, Mr. Smith expressed support of the grant application in order to move forward with exploration of a solution to the beach access problem experienced now, as well as in the foreseeable future. Mr. Fuchs also expressed support of pursuing the grant application. Mr. Fuchs entered a motion to accept the Tourist Development Council Grant request in the amount of $200,000for the Clsm Pass Beach Park Parking Garage Design and Permitting. Mr. Smith seconded the motion. Four members were infavor, with a dissent by Mr. Brougham- The motion was carried by majority. d. Dual Purpose Tennis Courts A request for presentation was submitted by a local citizen, Mr. Ernie Kerski, for consideration of adding pickleball court lines to some existing tennis courts at Max Hass and Vineyards Parks, so as to serve the dual purpose of playing tennis and pickleball. Mr. Kerski was not in attendance at the meeting; however, his written statement cited the advantages of adding pickleball court lines to existing tennis courts at these two facilities were that county residents would be better served with respect to travel time for North Naples residents to play pickleball, as well as the cost savings to the county by not having to construct additional pickleball courts. Mr. Williams stated that while Staff was not opposed to this idea, there was concern that Max Haas only has two courts and that the tennis facility at the Vineyards was heavily utilized. Pickleball may presently be played at Veteran's Park and East Naples Community Park. Question (Ms. Gibson-Laemel): How utilized are the courts at Max Haas? Answer: The courts at Max Haas are not heavily used. Page 8 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) Mr. Smith stated his preference for the tennis courts at these two park locations to remain as is due to the recent conversion ofso many courts for pickleball play, and the necessity to allow access and availability for tennis play as well, especially in support of local school tennis programs. Mr. Smith entered t motion to deny the request to re-stripe tennis courtsfor dual purpose play of pickleball and lennis at Max Haas, Ir. Park and the Vineyards Community Park, Mr. Fuchs seconded the motion. All were infavor. The motion was carried. e. North Naples Park Request - Mr. Michael Garito Mr. Garito addressed PARAB for consideration of a new park in North Naples being included in the 2018 Master Plan. Mr. Garito narrated a slide presentation, which began with a map of existing parks in relation to the proposed new park site located at the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Tree Farm Road. Mr. Garito stated this site would serve the surrounding densely populated area, which is anticipated to continue to be heavily developed. Mr. Garito cited accessibility and walking distance issues to the existing local parks. Further, local parks are not easily accessible by bus lines, as it would require 2 separate buses to reach Max Haas Park. The proposed location is on the CAT bus line route, as well as the Collier bike path. The proposed site is 37 acres of undeveloped property which is privately owned and is adjacent to preserve areas. A design concept was shared for visualization purposes ofhow the space may be used, which included multiple fields, courts, parking, as well as dedicated preserve space. Mr. Garito has collected close to 400 written and online signatures olcitizens in support ofthe idea ofa new park at this location. Mr. Williams stated that Real Estate Services could be asked to approach the property owner for possible interest in sale ofthe property; however, purchase of this property was not included in the 201 1 Master Plan or the current version, and funding options are limited. While Mr. Brougham stated he was generally in support of this concept, he pointed out that there is presently an active Planned Unit Development (PUD) application by Naples Villa, which is to be presented to the BOCC for consideration. The property is therelore unavailable pending resolution of that application. Mr. Smith also endorsed the concept of a new park servicing this area and suggested that Staff consult with Real Estate Services to investigate this further. Mr. Gibson-Laemel also expressed her support and inquired as to the possibility of assistance from Conservation Collier. Mr. Williams discussed the application process through Conservation Collier and that the property owner must initiate the process. Page 9 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) Mr. Smith entered a motionfor Parks Staff to coordinate with Real Estate Services to investigate park land opportunities in North Naples and to report theseJindings to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Mr. Brougham seconded the motion. All were infavor. The motion was carried VII. Old Business a. Parks and Recreation Master Plan - Mr. Oliver Tindale Mr. Tindale provided an overview of the Parks Master Plan draft, which was defined within three separate categories; facilities, capital facilities, and assets, as well as programs provided at each facility. The results of public outreach meetings and resultant recommendations were presented. As part of the master planning process, the 2011 Master Plan was first reviewed as a baseline from which to build upon, prioritizing needs and projects by timeline and available assets. A demographic analysis was done, including population density, age of residents, seasonal versus visitors, and income, with analysis of trends versus identified baseline conditions. A population density map was shown, with parks currently located in more densely populated areas. A needs analysis, which studied utilization, drive time, and level of service, identified a significant gap in these categories being filled with the construction of Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park. Current park utilization was contrasted with 2011, with over-utilization of multiuse fields and ball fields continuing to be an issue at some parks. Public outreach surveys which were done yielded several thousand responses, with public workshops held in order to solicit public feedback as well. Input provided by the focus v group participants identified 10 major themes to be considered in developing the Master Plan recommendations as follows: 1. Continue 20lT plan efforts. 2. Maintain existing assets. 3. Expand parks/facilities. 4. Develop Blueways/expand passive boating opportunities. 5. Expand civic recreation programs. 6. Sports tourism partnership. 7. Enhance beach access. 8. Enhance park accessibility. 9. Enhance marketing/branding of parks system. 10. Evaluate funding opportunities. Public feedback also identified specific community desires and needs; for example, facilities and program needs in Immokalee versus Blueways, trails, and preserve focused interests in Naples. Overall feedback with regard to park access identified a desire for greater active/passive transportation access, either via public transportation or walkways and sidewalks. Public opinion varied on funding opportunities, with an approximate 50/50 split on the initiation of an additional sales tax, increased property tax, and sports tourism based income. Page 10 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) Preliminary recommendations were categorized by capital facilities and assets, programming priorities, maintenance, and other priorities. A map of capital priorities was shown which included the 4 regional parks, with Big Corkscrew Regional Park identified as one ofthe largest capital adjustments presently being made, with resultant questions regarding flrnding coverage for this project in addition to the other county wide needs identified. Construction and maintenance of multipurpose fields was also identified as a significant funding challenge. The direction of the development of Manatee Community Park remains an active issue; either as an enhanced passive park or with the coJocation of affordable housing onsite. Park maintenance issues were discussed and require further long-term prioritization within the available budget. Attention to public interest in additional pickleball facilities and trail systems, such as the Vanderbilt Beach Extension were viewed as priorities as well. Discussions remain ongoing in coordination with various county groups during the Master Planning process, including with the School Board, Public Works, and Public Transportation. Finally, a lO-year funding strategy to meet the current and long-term priorities within the Parks Division will need to be solidified. Question (Mr. Smith): The utilization analysis resulted in the recommendation of an additional 15 fields countywide. What tlpes of fields are recommended; ball fields or multipurpose fields? Answer: Multipurpose fields are seen as the priority, with available remaining assets determining the inclusion of additional baseball and softball fields. Mr. Tindale suggested that the planned Sports Complex may assist in serving local ball field needs; however Mr. Smith expressed his reservations as to the accessibility by local citizens to this new facility, which may be travel team/sports tourism focused. Question (Mr. Smith): Should the Parks Master Plan include provisions for Ranger offices and eco-friendly restrooms? Answer: As the Master Planning process continues to be defined, consideration may be given to inclusion ofthese items, dependent upon final priority identification and available capital. Question (Mr. Smith): Is there a way to extend the debt of construction of Big Corkscrew Regional Park? Answer: Yes, consideration may be given to the extension of repayment of this debt from 10 years to 20 years. On April 24,2018, the Board ofCounty Commissioners approved an ordinance to impose a 17o local government infrastructure surtax, if approved by voter referendum, in November 2018. The capital project list included in the ordinance identifies $40M in funding to complete Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park. Page 1 1 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) Ftrnding options were briefly discussed, contrasting bond referendum, impact fees, millage rates, long-term debt, and sales tax. Question (Mr. Smith): The report places an emphasis on the North Naples area of the county. Are other areas being considered for fuither development? Answer: Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park is being constructed to address the needs of residents east of Collier Boulevard/951, while the new Sports Complex will be constructed in East Naples. Manatee Community Park was built for utilization as a local passive park. While additional properties are available on the East Trail, none are presently under consideration for development by the Parks Division at this time. Mr. Smith requested further clarification on community feedback regarding senior based programs. Mr. Williams replied that more program based information will become available as the master planning process continues. Mr. Brougham requested PARAB members forward additional questions or comments to Ms. McPherson prior to the presentation of the preliminary Master Plan to the Board of Connty Commissioners on May 22,2018. Question (Ms. Gibson-Laemel): Is a vote expected by PARAB on this document at this time? Answer: While adjustments will continue to be made to this Master Plan draft, an endorsement by PARAB of the broad plan would be useful when moving forward with presentation to the BOCC. Mr. Brougham remarked that the 2018 Master Plan draft appears to sufficiently address the changing demographics within the county; however, noted the disparity between community wants/needs and available funding. Mr. Brougham suggested that a list of potential funding options also be presented to the BOCC to support the inherent costs associated with this comprehensive plan. Question (Ms. Gibson-Laemel): A proposed North Naples Park is an agenda item for discussion, but is not included in the Master Plan draft. WiU this project be excluded from consideration within the next 10 years that the current plan is in effect? Answer: Discussion has been had with a private citizen who has approached the Parks Division with regard to the possible purchase of a parcel of property off of Collier Boulevard for the construction of a park in that area. Mr. Williams pointed out the close proximity of several parks already in that area. Although there are presently no plans at present to purchase additional properties in that vicinity, the citizen had been scheduled to present his plan to PARAB for review and discussion. Mr. Brougham pointed out that AUIR parameters for level of service were presently being met. Page 12 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) Question (Ms. Bilts): Is the parcel of land in question large enough to assist with the deficit in ball fields which had been identifred in the analysis that was done. Answer: Mr. Williams replied that plans are being put together to build additional ball fields at existing park locations, such as the Vanderbilt Beach Extension Park, as well as shared space at school sites. Question (Ms. Gibson-Laemel): Where is the Vanderbilt Beach Extension Park located? Answer: The Parks Division owns a parcel ofland located along Vanderbilt Beach Road, north ofthe present construction area, at which a Little League Toumament Park is being considered. Question (Mr. Smith): Is there a way to incorporate and emphasize beach related issues in the Master Plan, such as the necessity for greater beach access? Answer: Further analysis and discussions will be had with regard to the economic impacts and issues related to beach access, and witl be incorporated into the prioritization ofprojects in the finalized plan. Question (Ms. Gibson-Laemel): What are the next steps if PARAB endorses the Master Plan draft? Answer: The Master Plan draft will be presented to the BOCC, along with the endorsement by PARAB, for their consideration and vote. Ifapproved, the plan will be adopted and used as a guideline by the Parks Division for the following ten years. \/ However, it is a flexible guideline, with the ability for modification as deemed appropnate. Mr. Brougham entered d motion to endorse lhe 2018 Master Plan draft as presented, with the proviso thal Parks Staff will provide the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board a lisl offunding options to supporl the priority projects identilied within the Plan. Ms. Bills seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion was carried VIII. Adopt A Park Due to time constraints, Adopt A Park reports were held until the next meeting. IX. DirectorsHighlights Directors Highlights were deferred until the next meeting. X. Board Comments Mr. Brougham requested that the PARAB members receive the meeting agenda packet earlier than two days prior to a scheduled meeting, in order to allow for ample time to review the material. Mr. Brougham expressed concem at having adequate time at the meetings to discuss agenda items appropriately. Page 13 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) In support, Mr. Fuchs recommended that PARAB meetings possibly be held on a different day or at an earlier time. Mr. Williams will survey PARAB members as to alternate meeting date and time options which would be more amenable. Public Comments +Mr. Elliot Miller expressed his passionate opposition to the proposed next steps outlined by Mr. Carnell with regard to the co-development concept at Manatee Park. Mr. Miller stated that it appeared momentum was being created in a particular direction. "There have been many meetings at which significant opposition to the Manatee Park confiscation has been expressed. Doing meetings over the summer when I am unable to aggregate a large number of people to attend, I think, is prejudicial to the cause of maintaining Manatee Park. I want to be clear. I am not making any personal allusions to Mr. Camell or his colleagues, but it seems to me that the Housing Staff is advocating a policy decision regarding Manatee Park and frankly, I do not think that is the position or posture for the Housing Staff to take. Policy positions are or should be the role of elected public officials; the members of the Board of County Commissioners. Staff should execute positions already adopted by elected officials and not attempt to supersede those positions. Staff s attempt to preempt the role of elected officials here should not set the agenda for this Board regarding Manatee Park. We have heard a lot today in the presentation of the Master Plan, including comments by Mr. Williams, which I thought were very appropriate, dealing with the need for additional parks due to the overuse of existing parks, and that the discussion continues that Manatee Park remain as a park. Mr. Williams mentioned the need for active parks. Ten years ago, a fine plan was established for the creation of infrastructure at Manatee Park, with buildings and a lovely layout. You, Mr. Brougham, were involved in that. That had to be abandoned when county funds that were originally intended for Manatee Park were given to Eagle Lakes Park. We do have the need for active parks, we heard that. We heard that from the presentation, we heard that from Mr. Williams comment. I would suggest that the plans for Manatee Park, beautiful plans, in which you participated, Mr. Brougham, can be resurrected and the park can be developed as planned, as a passive park. Your plan that was originally created 10 years ago, with the buildings, etc., can be resurrected without the use of any county funds. Local governments throughout this country frequently raise money for projects like this by for-profit and commercial sponsorship, specifically using naming rights, and that is what I am suggesting to you now, here, for the development of Manatee Park." Mr. Miller provided multiple examples of facilities which are named after individuals or entities via naming rights. Mr. Miller went on to say, "If this Board wants to restore Manatee Park to the splendid future once planned for it, you can do that by recommending to the Board of County Commissioners that funds be raised through commercial sponsorship. I would ask you to suggest to the Board of County Commissioners that you would work with them in identifuing prospective donors through a Parks and Recreation Advisory meeting, inviting them and showing them the original plans to glorify Manatee Park and ultimately suggest that with the right donation, the park will bear their name. Page 14 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) You, unlike the Housing Staff, are a policymaking body and I urge you to put forth the policy for enrichment and preservation, and not this conversion into a housing community." Question/Response (Mr. Smith): The need for active parks has been identified. May Manatee Park be considered for use as an active park? Answer: Mr. Elliot replied that this decision is up to the Board, but encouraged consideration. Ultimately, the desire was for implementation of the original passive park design. Mr. Brougham clarified that when the concept of Manatee Park being utilized as an active park was up for discussion in 2006, the concept ofthe installation ofball fields and lights were met with strong opposition by the neighboring community. Mr. Brougham further clarified that no decisions regarding Manatee Park would be made over the summer and in fact, a commitment had been made that the Manatee Park issue would not move forward for presentation to the BOCC until Fall 2018. The formation of subcommittees which would meet over the summer would be for the purpose of meeting sooner than September/October in order to discuss ideas and concepts related to Manatee Park. Mr. Elliot reiterated the importance of attendance at these meeting by local residents. Mr. Williams clarified that the subcommittee meetings would be publicly announced meetings, with the public invited to attend. +Ms. Mary Ellen Cash addressed PARAB to discuss her views on the concept of construction ofa parking garage at Clam Pass. Ms. Cash is a 25 year resident of Collier County and one of the founders of the Multicultural Community Advisory Alliance, which represents all communities throughout Collier County. Ms. Cash stated this was a quality of life issue, as the beach is not large enough to support a 300 parking space garage, which would bring an approximate 1200 additional people to the beach. Ms. Cash stated a recommendation from the Multicultural Community Advisory Alliance was for the Parks Division to utilize the parking lot located across from Naples Beach Club, either in collaboration with the Naples Beach Club or as a donation to the county for the purposes of this project. It was felt this solution would also solve the parking deficit noted during holidays and special events in that area. Question (Ms. Bills): Where is Naples Beach Club located? Answer: It is Naples Beach Hotel, which is located in the Moorings. +Ms. Nora Beyrent addressed PARAB to express her opposition to the concept of construction ofa parking garage at Clam Pass. Stated reasons against the parking garage included the visual impact on residents in the area, which would be created by the large structure, as well as the intrusion ofthe security lighting which would likely be necessary ovemight. Public and resident safety, increased noise and traffic were of significant concem, as well as significant environmental stress created by the toxic runoff from the ongoing construction occurring throughout the local vicinity. Page 15 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018) xI. Ms. Beyrent suggested the construction of an off-site parking garage, with shuttle service to Seagate Beach, which would alleviate these issues. Ms. Beyrent further suggested financing of the project be accomplished via the hotel bed tax. As a point of clarification, Mr. Williams stated that beach parks are open dawn to dusk, and are closed in the evening. A discussion was recently held with the City of Naples regarding beach access issues and clarified that Public Transit is currently offering beach shuttle service. The idea of a parking garage is presently being explored at Clam Pass due to the availability of 2000linear feet which is presently underutilized. This plan is in response to the increase in population going to that community, coupled with the inadequate road system in that area and in anticipation of long range growth over the next 5 to l0 years. +The President of the Seagate Board addressed PARAB and inquired as to whether data was available as to the usage of the parking lot at present, as a neighborhood meeting had yielded the opinion that the lot was seldom full. He asked that this data be shared with the public. A secondary issue cited was the narrow and already busy roadway, which is shared by cars, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The speaker stated that all of the commercial outlets presently flow from Pine Ridge onto this narrow stretch from Pine Ridge to Creek, and that adding traffic without reconfiguring the roadways would create a disaster. Adjournment There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair. These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on presented, or as amended as Page 16 30.A.3 Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: PARAB Meeting Minutes - May 9, 2018 (6124 : Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting - June 20, 2018)