Agenda 06/28/2011 Item #10E
6/28/2011 Item 10.E.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approves a Land Development
Code Amendment Cycle.
OBJECTIVE: To have the BCC approve an LDC Amendment cycle in the fall of201 I (Fiscal
Year 2012).
CONSIDERATIONS: The adoption process for the Administrative Code includes Staff review
of the consultant's draft. During this review, Staff has found inconsistencies in the LDC which
were inadvertently omitted or changed during the recodification of the LDe. Some of these
"glitches" may be substantive and therefore; may not be addressed in the Administrative Code.
In addition, the County Manager invited the Collier Building Industry Association (CBIA) to
suggest possible amendments to the LOC which may spur economic activity without affecting
the high quality of development in the County. The CBIA has suggested several LOC
Amendments.
/-
Recent Growth Management Plan Amendments also require LDC Amendments for
implementation. County Staff, in the course of reviewing permits and applications, also has
suggestions for improved efficiency in the LOC.
There is also State legislation that mandates local changes to the LDC.
FISCAL IMP ACT: County Staff will review proposed amendments and be involved in the
public hearing process for LDC Amendments. Individual amendments may also have fiscal
impacts, but they will be considered during the public hearing process. The work will be
completed by existing budgeted employees and budgeted operating funds.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approved Growth Management Plan Amendments
will require LDC Amendments for implementation.
LEGAL CONSIDER<\TIONS: This item is legally suflicient. A majority vote is needed for
Board approval. HFAC
RECOMMENDATION: That the BCC approve an LDC Cycle Amendment and direct the
County Manager or his designee to schedule the nccessary hearing dates.
PREPARED BY: Fred Reischl, AICP. Senior Planner, Growth Management Division -
Planning & Regulation
Attachment: I) List of Proposed Amendments
~.
Packet Page -266-
6/28/2011 Item 10.E.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 10.E.
Item Summary: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approve
a Land Development Code Amendment Cycle in the fall of 2011 (Fiscal Year 2012).
Meeting Date: 6/28/2011
Prepared By
Name: ReischlFred
Title: VALUE MISSING
6/2/2011 4:23:49 PM
Approved By
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, CDES
Date: 6/3/2011 12:21 :28 PM
Name: LorenzWilliam
Title: Director - CDES Engineering Services.Comprehensive
Date: 6/4/2011 12:25:20 PM
Name: BellowsRay
Title: Manager - Planning, Comprehensive Planning
Date:6/6/20117:31:21 PM
Name: F ederN onllan
Title: Administrator - Growth Management Div,Transportati
Date: 6/7/2011 8:57:11 AM
Name: MarcellaJeanne
Title: Executive Secretary.Transportation Planning
Date: 6/7/2011 I :38:18 PM
Name: AshtonHeidi
Title: Section ChieflLand Use-Transportation,County Attor
Date: 6/8/2011 12:22:34 PM
Packet Page -267-
6/28/2011 Item 10.E.
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 6/16/20119:52:50 AM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Director-Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs,CMO
Date: 6/20/2011 10:1 I :21 AM
Name: OchsLeo
Title: County Manager
Date: 6/20/2011 8:43:49 PM
Packet Page -268-
Proposed Land Development Code Amendments
Collier Building Industry Association
Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development
Archaeological sites and required vegetation
Rural Fringe exotics removal
Species management plans
Redevelopment thresholds
Architectural color and dimensional standards
Adequate public facilities thresholds
Street system requirements
Development standards In redevelopment areas
Buffer duplication and landscape view windows
Growth Management Plan generated
Bayshore/Gateway
Immokalee
Welifleld protection
Evaluation and Appraisal Report directed
State generated
Pet friendly restaurants
Land Development Code glitch and improved efficiency
Master mobility
Packet Page -269-
6/28/2011 Item 10.E.
1
Planned Unit Development open space
Estates non-conforming setbacks
Decision-making team
Stewardship Receiving Area architectural standards
Residential storage
Variance and administrative variance efficiency
Fence height
Fire-code cul-de-sac requirements
Dock facility definition
Vegetation Removal Permit exemption for Federal/State environmental projects
Emergency generator setbacks
Clearing and filling requirements
Packet Page -270-
6/28/2011 Item 10.E.
2