The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 06/14/2011 Item #17A Agenda Changes Board of County Commissioners Meeting June 14, 2011 Withdraw Item 16B2: A Resolution by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, designating the parcels of land depicted in the attached Exhibits A-G associated with the Immokalee Enterprise Zone as a Brownfield Area of Collier County for the purpose of economic development and environmental rehabilitation; authorizing the County Manager or his designee to notify the Department of Environmental Protection of said designation; and providing for an effective date (Staff request - wasn't advertised) Move Item 16Cl to Item 101: Recommendation to reject all quotes for the Lift Station 103.01 Rehabilitation Project and re-quote Project 70046. (Commissioner Fiala request) Move Item 16K4 to Item 16F5: Recommendation the Board of County Commissioners adopt a Resolution fixing the date, time and place for the Public Hearing for approving the Special Assessment (Non-ad valorem Assessment) to be levied against the properties within the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit. (Staffrequest - item placed under County Attorney's Report in error) MOVE ITEM 17A TO ITEM 8A: THIS ITEM REQUIRES EX PARTE DISCLOSURE BE PROVIDED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS. SHOULD A HEARING BE HELD ON THIS ITEM, ALL PARTICIPANTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SWORN IN. PUDZ-2007-AR-12292: COPE RESERVE RPUD -- AMENDING ORDINANCE 2004-41, COLLIER COUNTY'S LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS; BY CHANGING ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE COPE RESERVE RPUD. THE PROJECT PROPOSES A TOTAL OF 43 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING UNITS IN SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 14.3:f: ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (COMMISSIONER FIALA'S REQUEST) Move Item 17G to 8B: Recommendation to adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 49 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, relating to economic development, which will establish additional criteria to be evaluated (1) when there is a request to lessen or waive certain requirements in existing economic development ordinances and programs, and (2) when there is an application seeking grants and/or other incentives which fall outside existing economic development ordinances and programs. (Commissioner Hiller's request) ~ Item 10C: Recommendation to award a construction contract in the amount of $25,935,470.53 $24,905,238.93 to Astaldi Construction Corporation and reserve $3,315,000.00 on the purchase order for funding allowances, for a total of $28,220,238.93 for ITB No. 10-5342 - "SR 84 (Davis Boulevard) Radio Road to Collier Boulevard; SR/CR 951 Intersection improvements; Collier Blvd (SR/CR 951) North to Magnolia Pond Drive; and CR 951 (Collier Boulevard) North to the E Golden Gate Canal", Project No. 60073 and Project No. 60092. (Staffs request - typographical error in dollar amount) Item 16D5: Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign an amendment to the 2010 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Subrecipient Agreement with the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Immokalee approved on October 26, 2010 (Item laDa) (Item 16D3). This amendment will correct a scrivener's error and revise the scope of services on the original agreement to include travel costs. The scope revision will not increase the previously awarded grant total. (Commissioner Henning's request) Item 16E2: There was a page omitted from the back up documents on the monthly change order report. "Under item 6 of the change order report, the cost of the added service is 17 cents per member (employee or dependent) per month". (Staff's request) Time Certain Items for Tuesdav. June 14: Item 9B to be heard at 9:45 a.m. Item 9C to be heard immediately following Item 9B Item 9F to be heard at 1 :05 p.m. Item lOB to be heard at 10:45 a.m. Item 10F to be heard at 2:00 p.m. Item llA to be heard at 12:00 noon-Closed Session Item llB to be heard at 1:00 p.m. Time Certain Items for Wednesday. June 15: Item 10D to be heard at 10:00 a.m. Item 10E to be heard at 9:00 a.m. 6/14/2011 8:57 AM ~; 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. PUDZ-2007-AR-12292: Cope Reserve RPUD - An ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps; by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Estates (E) Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the Cope Reserve RPUD. The project proposes a total of 43 single~family demched dwelling units in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 14.3d: acres; and by providing an effective date. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCe) review staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPe) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding this PUD rezone petItion; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: . The project known as Cope Reserve RPUD, proposed to develop a total of 43 single-family detached dwelling units. As depicted on the pun Master Plan on the following page, sole access to the property would be from Cope Lane, an east-west roadway that would form the northern boundary of the property. The development would be served by a single, 50-foot wide cul-de-sac roadway, subject to approval of two associated deviations being requested. The exact alignment, as well as the placement of dwelling units along it, would be determined at the time of platting or site development plan (SDP) approval. Approximately 1.92 acres along the property's eastern and northeastern boundary, representing 60 percent of the site, would be maintained as preserve. For additional information, please refer to the staff report prepared for the CCPC. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building penn it include building pern1it review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the . Planning Commission to analyze this petition. Packet Page -2120- . . . --- .-,-':71 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMP ACT: The subject site is designated Urban (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as depicted in the Future Land Use Element [FLUE] and on the Future Land Use Map in the GMP. This Subdistrict pernlits residential development (variety of unit types) at a base density of four dwelling units per acre (DU/A). This district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential uses, including mixed-use developments such as Planned Unit Developments (PUD). The purpose of the Urban Residential Subdistrict is to allow higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. The residential uses proposed in this PUD are consistent with the Urban Mixed Use District/Urban Residential Subdistrict. This request proposed to develop the 14.3-acre site at a density of three Dwelling units/acre for a total of 43 dwelling units. That density is within the eligible density for the FLUE. A detailed analysis of the project's consistency with the FLUE, and any other relevant GMP Elements is contained in the attached Staff Report. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition on April 7, 2011, and by a vote of 9 to 0, recommended forwarding the amended request (see below) to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval subject to the following changes to be made to the PUD document: Exhibit A: Remove zero lot line-, townhome-, and multi-family dwelling; Exhibit B: 1. Remove the Property Development Regulations for the uses that have been eliminated; 2. Revise the footnotes that addressed eliminated uses; Exhibit C: Remove buffering requirements that addressed eliminated uses. Exhibit F: 1. Revise Transportation Condition #2.B to more clearly state the improvements to be made to Cope Lane; 2. Remove Conditions #3 that contained Fire Code conditions because the listed conditions are reiterations of Code requirement. Add Exhibits G-1 and G-2 that show the Cope Lane proposed Turn Lane (G-1) and the Cope Lane Cross Section (0-2). The petitioner has made these revisions to the PUD document that is included in the draft ordinance. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site specific rezone from an Estates (E) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the Cope Reserve RPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more ofthe listed criteria below. Packet Page -2121- . . . -~ 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. Criteria for RPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Confonnity of the proposed RPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with RPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed RPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 1 1. Would the requested RPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Packet Page -2122- . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a ~~core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs ofthe neighborhood or the county? ?'"' --'. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting-such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed RPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.l06, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the RPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the Packet Page -2123- . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney's Office. This item has been reviewed for legal sufficiency and is legally sufficient for Board action. An affinnative vote of four is necessary for Board approval. (STW) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendations ofthe CCPC and further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request subject to the attached PUD Ordinance that includes both the staff recommendation and the CCPC recommendation. PREPARED BY: Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section, Land Development Services Department, Growth Management Division, Planning and Regulation Attachments: ]) Staff Report 2) Application 3) Ordinance Packet Page -2124- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.A. Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. PUDZ-2007-AR-12292: Cope Reserve RPUD -- An ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004- 41, the Collier County land Development Code, which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps; by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Estates (E) Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the Cope Reserve RPUD. The project proposes a total of 43 single-family detached dwelling units in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 14.3:t acres; and by providing an effective date. Meeting Date: 6/14/2011 . Prepared By Name: DeselemKay Title: Planner, Principal,Engineering & Environmental Ser 3/24/2011 10:58:56 AM Approved By Name: PuigJudy Title: Operations Analyst, CDES Date: 5/17/2011 3:29:07 PM Name: BellowsRay Title: Manager - Planning, Comprehensive Planning Date: 5/18/20 I I 11 :25 :44 AM Name: LorenzWiIliam Title: Director - CDES Engineering Services, Comprehensive Date: 5/18/2011 5:21 :31 PM . Name: MarcellaJeanne Title: Executive Secretary,Transportation Planning Packet Page -2125- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A, . Date: 5/20/2011 10:35:39 AM . . Name: FederNonnan Title: Administrator - Growth Management Div,Transportati Date: 5/24/2011 7:29:19 AM Name: WiIIiamsSteven Title: Assistant County Attorney,County Attorney Date: 5/24/2011 10:07:24 AM Name: KlatzkowJeff Title: County Attorney, Date: 5/27/2011 11:47:27 AM Nalne: Isackso~ark Title: Director-Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs,CMO Date: 6/6/2011 9:35:24 AM Name: OchsLeo Title: County Manager Date: 6/6/2011 11 :14:01 AM Packet Page -2126- . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. C~_, ",eT County ,c:::,::::~;:_:~..:::'_l";:~~t::;;;"=-~~-0z:3.~-~_.......-t~:?<',.;:--=~.:]'3;;:::;0:'~';:'-':;~~{.:l';i::::~ STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING SERVICES--LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEJvffiNT DIVISION--PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: APRIL 7. 2011 FROM: SUBJECT: PUDZ-2007-AR-12292, COPE RESERVE RPUD PROPERTY OWNER & APPLICANT/AGENT: Ownerl Applicant Agents: Highland Properties of Lee & Collier County, Ltd. 6980 Sandalwood Lane Naples, FL 34109 D. Wayne Arnold, AICP 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Mr. Richard D. Y ovanovich, Esquire Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester. P.A. Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 REOUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an application for a rezone from the Estates (E) Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the Cope Reserve RPUD. GEOGRAPIDC LOCATION: The 14.3::1:: acre subject property is located at the southeastern corner of Cope Lane and County Barn Road in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map and proposed PUD Master Plan on the following pages) PURPOSEIDESClUPTION OF PROJECT: Approval of this project, known as Cope Reserve RPUD, will allow development of a total of 43 dwelling units comprised of single-family detached, single-family attached, multi-family and townhouse unit types. AB depicted on the PUD Master Plan on the following page, sole access to the property would be from Cope Lane, an east-west roadway that would form the northem boundary of the property. The development would be served by a single, 50-foot vvide cul-de-sac roadway, subject to approval of two associated deviations being requested. The exact alignment, Cope Reserve RPUD, PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7. 2011 ccpe Revised: 3/21/11 Page 1 of 17 Packet Page -2127- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. w ~ Q~ ~ . w;,. E~ f ~ L!l ~u 'c.: C.s ~ ~ LU ~ 0- j I <( I :2 g I I ~ i C) .. I it ~~ I " Z 5:~ ~~, I I I w - ~.f5 B c \ c..'" i -' ~ III =; t:: &:,. Z 5 ~ I ~ ii\ 0 1;; N I I. , tu ~ il N <~ '" % ~ N ce N ~ ~D c sl!> ~ N ~ g ~ w. ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ 0:: ~ c ~ ~i ",=- r-- !l 0 0 N . . N nrzOl.1Df4 / I- Cl - ~ a. '"' ~~- i~ z U! 2 0 ~G l- I- W a. ~ N > ~ ~ 0- fi~ !i <( " ~ N " N Z 0 - l- e::( ~ () ~ 0 ~ ....I ;;; ~ > 3 . ~ ~ N ::: :'l a :;;- ~ .. ~ "" ~; ~ : i5!i~ ~ i~e .. iSl:l ~:l .. c i ~! -0/0."'11I ........ """'" . e 5! " I!. ~ c i ~ ! l! ~ I ~ '? ~3WY" I I ! :a J<-t: pi ~~~ I ~8~ I Packet Page -2128- 1-. --z_ :i . . . 2 t "'w ffig ~.. ;:W ~'!! 251 :>z 00 ~N W OJ o u ._~.~_I__I_ -, I: Ii -, Ii I Ii .' IJ ~' :.. !.':.' ~ ' ( , !..' ' I'\.. ' 1----""'>--"< w u Z w" oW ->- 8l~ "'.. ~ll! ~~ ",0 ..w ~i5 ClN Z 1ii .. >- w :-lw~ ::;u>- "'Z.. ..wW ~~.~ ~~ffi .. Z 2 w u ~f3 tij~ w>- "'.. >-w ~~ :E~ ~z ",S i!; .. W o z w" QI!! ~i!: "'.. ,.,w ~~ 0(0 ",w wZ -,0 ",N Z 1ii '" :s~ u:>- w.... a.<~ ~wo ~~~ ~~~ ~i !;! c:::: c:::: IN ~ I , 0:: -J,';------ l ~L5 I ffia:: : Iii < I 0 , I '-- 0:: a.. COUNTY BARN ROAD I" o ~.. OW -'.... W~ ~[3 ZuI :>-. ..:0 ZW ",Z 02 ~ 'in .LJ '~l Packet Page -2129- ~ t ~ ~ ii ~ ~ . D ~ i i! ~ ~g ~d i ~i I ~ oft I ffE '" :p U t.~..~i ~ ;, ~ n ""~tIlCllCl/f_'lleE11__r3loD'1 o ~HJ g>- ~~ OW zui :>.. ..:fiJ Zz t32 ~ '" w ffi u.. ZW Q!;( ~~ 5ui We ZW ~i5 ",N w '" ::; N o t- M~ ,ilj ~~ !!!~ ~fil "'~ WZ ~~ ~ffi zOo -> ~o ",z :>w >-0 0.< ~g a~ 00 !!!l5 53 "-- .. ~8 ffj ~~ t- o Z .: OJ z o ~ ~ o EI '" o Z 'i ~ ~ z o ~ ii: o o ::; g >- u W al :> '" o :t I!!i ~1i1 ~~ ..>- ~~ !!!'" wO 0"- iliO "," ~~ ~w -,'" "'F --'--', i i 1!1l Ii! : iE : !~ i !~~ II' ii :i,1 II~ : I~ ! is Ilr: ii:J , .~ i l~ i I~ 11~ 1-: ill! : ,~ i I~ : j~ ii~ : ,m i1~ !1' : i~ ,,. i i. lit, ! i< : l~ :i~ -IE II-I : It !I~ / !!~ .~>~ !II~ " ~~ i I!~ _ _ ,// ~ '" 1 li~ ',' ... . ',' _, . C___ n _ 0 ,: li~E it y , , , -' . -'\I ~ ,. .,. r ,..., ,. ., --- ., I i ! , ..')' If. , ')!'~ " 'i: i~ ~ : l~ ~ l.: l~ , ) j i~ , '): Ii: " ,,' " ,,' ) I j~ , " " ' ,) ,'" ~""J--'>-L""'~--'~ ' ' " ' '. ,)' Ii: ~"""'-'-"........o!:-...L~ :it of ) !.: _-....J...J~.,.,L'-"--'~J.<J:.. 1111 _,__._ n"ij! -.--.--.--.--. :: N ~~PJii ~ ..,.r<').c:::- ::J f3 ~;~~ Q 5 6~~~ < <0"':0 :f ::~~~ t. ~~d~ )(- w 1I11~U ~ '" . w It '" . . u ~o.", E~.1! ~ffi~ ~ fa~ ~ (J) ~n. .c::: 02 >-- "'.... uw <ll~ ill'" ~S 5~ ..w ~~ ~~ :r:~ u", n aiu ffiUj ~~ "'~ -:> =>u g< "'>- ~~ ~~ ",0 Iii>- ~t; >-~ "'0 ~S .oIL ~o ~~ >-z lrl~ "'''' u::> 9~:i ",~t; ~~~ Ei "'0 ..w . 0,,-0 ~~~ ~:~ wO", ~~!!l fi3~~ ~~~ j5filli "'wI- O:l:Z "'>-:5 ~~a. owu >-w"' 1-:>0 51:1il o"W o ;ti!' >-w'" "'..w ::;..>- c(~!tc ~~ffi "'",.. wulL >",:> ",0 III wZW ~:5~ g:og WWO ;=~5 ..; El ~ ~ &i ~ Q;: fl: c u z S 11. u~ ~~ 8~ ~ u z o u ww :r:::i >-0 z:l: OZ 0;: ~d~ 0'" zo w>- ",... ~~ ~.. fa5 N:> =>'" ",c :>~ w:> ..0 -J~ . ci",O ~~~ ~ffii!= ..>-Z :>",0 ..~O oc~ w:>o 0.,,--' ~;;!~ w:>o ~fu~ ~~~ <o~ ~9 =~_~ ~l ~~~~ ~~ ....-'- ~jj - ;u:;~ lj- ~ ~ ! i~J i HUj i ~ - j" g ~r ~ c_ ~ € i~j o:l .:l~ ~ ~ . J! ~dl _.sa ~~ ~ii u; .; a; ~ n W '" o ~ t- Z :> ... )( ... t ciiw 0", :;!;u ~~ ;:- CZ -,:> ",0 ~~ w-' CW ~~ "',., ",' :>~ ~'" ~Z ::;l!l I 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. as well ~s the placement of dwelling units along it, would be determined at the time of platting or . site dev:elopment plan (SDP) approval. Approximately 1.92 acres along the property's eastern and northeastern boundary, representing 60 percent of the site, would be maintained as preserve. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: ~ope Lane, then a County':'owned water retention area South: a five-acre tract developed as a school, and an undeveloped five-acre tract, both tracts have a Provisional Use [now called a Conditional Use] for a private school and a Conditional Use for; the replacement of an existing 280 foot tall communication tower (there does not appear to be a tower on site), both tracts have an underlying zoning designation of Estates East: single-family home sites with a zoning designation of Estates West: County Barn Road, then 1.92-2.5:1= acre sized tracts along Wilmar Lane some of which are dev~loped with single-family homes with a zoning designation of Estates . Aerial Photo (subject site depiction is approximate) GRO\VTH M..<\NAGKMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject site is designated Urban! (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as depicted in the Future Land Use Etement [FLUE] and on the Future Land Use Map in the GMP. This Subdistrict permits residert.tial development (variety of unit types) at a base density of four dwelling units per acre (Du/A). This district is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential uses, Fc1uding mixed-use developments such as Planned Unit Developments (PUD). The . I Cope R,eserve RPUD. PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, ?011 CCPC Revise~: 3/21/11 Page 2 of 17 Packet Page -2130- . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. purpose of the Urban Residential Subdistrict is to allow higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. The residential uses proposed in this PUD are consistent with the Urban Mixed Use District/Urban Residential Subdistrict. The Density Rating System provides for a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre in the Urban Residential Subdistrict The site lies within the residential density band around Mixed Use Activity Center #6, thus the site is eligible for a density bonus of up to three DU/A. Density is calculated based upon the gross project acreage. Therefore, based upon the project's location, it is eligible for up to 7 DU/A. Base Density 4 DU/A Density Band + 3 DU/ A Eligible Density 7 DU/A x 14.3 acres = 100 DUs This request proposed to develop the 14.3-acre site at a density of 3 DU/acre for a total of 43 dwelling units. That density is within the eligible density for the FLUE. In reviewing for compliance with Objective 7 and subsequent Policies (shown in italics) regarding' Smart Growth principles (interconnections, loop road, sidewalks/trails, etc.), staff provides the following analysis in bold text. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. (The project will have access to Cope Lane, a local road that exits onto County Barn Road, a collector road. Transportation Planning staff has determined direct access to County Barn Road is not desirable, and is prohibited in Exhibit F, item 2.A.) Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for trafjic signals. (The PUD Master Plan indicates a single access point directly onto Cope Lane; direct access to County Barn Road is not provided and is prohibited. The project has one internal, cul-de-sac road. Due to the small size and configuration of the subject site, a loop road is not possible.) Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. (Given the project's small size and configuration, and its proposed development pattern, interconnections to the north, east and south are not feasible and would arguably serve little purpose. To the north are two parcels of about 2~ acres each, fronting on Cope Lane; both are zoned E-Estates and each contains a single-family dwelling. To the east is a 2~-acre parcel zoned "E" and containing a single-family dwelling, also fronting Cope Lane. To the south is an institutional use (private school) on a 5-acre parcel zoned "E," fronting on County Barn Road; and east of that is an undeveloped 5-acre parcel zoned "E".) Cope Reserve RPUD, PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, 2011 CCPC Revised: 3/21/11 Page 3 of 17 Packet Page -2131- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. ! j . Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new d(;\Jelopments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. (A sidewalk will be provided within the community. The PUD provides preserve areas ap.d allows for a variety of housing unit types.) I i Based ~pon the above. analysis, Comprehensive Planning Staff finds the proposed PUD consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact! Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the five-year planning period. Therefore, the subject:application can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Grow1# Management Plan (GMP). Mitigation is provided as required. This mitigation is proposed in the form of Cope Lane improvements up to the project driveway, as well as an agreembnt to accept, attenuate, and store stormwater for Cope Lane improvements along the property frontage (at no cost to the County). Also, the owner has provided a 50-foot wide reservation along County Barn Road for the purposes of accommodating drainage and utilities associated with the future County Barn Road widening. Conse~ation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental staff has evalua~d the proposed changes to the PUD documents. Environmental review staff found this projectlto be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). ! GMP Conclusion: . The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed rezo~g to CPUD. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approvfU with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. A finding of consistency with the FLUE iand FLUM designations is a portion of the overall finding that is required, and staff believes the petition is consistent with the FLUlVI and the FLUE as indicated previously in the GMP discussion with the additional buffering and setbacks to be provided to ensure consistency with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 (See Zoning Analysis later in this report). The proposed rezone is consis~ent with the GMP Transportation Element as previously discussed. Environmental staff also recommends that the petition be found consistent with the CCME. Therefore, zoning staff recomInends that the petition be found consistent with the goals, objective and policies of the overalE GMP. I ANALYSIS: Staff lias completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon -{vhich a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Subsection 10.02.B.B.S, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as th~ "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.03.05.1, Nature of Requirements of Planning I Comm;ission Report (referred to as ''Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to suppo~ the ccpe's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the bases for their recomrendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to . ! Cope Reserve RPUD, PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April?, 2011 CCPG Revised: 3/21/11 Page 4 of 17 Packet Page -2132- . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. support its action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff is recommending approval subject to the Environmental condition contained in Exhibit F of the PUD document. Due to the amended LDC requirements, this project is not required to be heard by the Environmental Advisory Council unless that action is a directive of the CCPC or BCC. The project site consists of 12.8 acres of native vegetation that generally consists of cypress/pine/cabbage palms, palmetto prairie, pine flatwoods and hydric Melaleuca. A minimum of 15% of the existing native vegetation shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. The proposed 1.92-acre wetland/upland preserve area is located along the western portion of the project site. No listed species were found on site. Impacts to the jurisdictional wetlands on the rest of the proj ect site shall be mitigated for through the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permitting process at the first development order. Transportation Review: Transportation Division staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document and Master Plan for right-of-way and access issues. County Barn Road. Impacts: The first concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link. 10, County Barn Road between Davis and Rattlesnake Hammock. The project generates 16 p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips, which represents a 1.86% impact. This segment of County Barn Road currently has a remaining capacity of (-2) trips, and is currently at LOS "F" as reflected by the 2010 AUIR. . The applicant has agreed to provide mitigation in the form of Cope Lane improvements up to the project driveway, as well as an agreement to accept, attenuate, and store stormwater for Cope Lane improvements along the property frontage (at no cost to the County). Also, the owner has provided a 50 foot wide reservation along County Barn Road for the purposes of accommodating drainage and utilities associated with the future County Barn Road widening. No subsequent concurrency links are significantly impacted by this project. Fire Review: Fire Review staff has reviewed this petition and recommends approval if the following stipulations are included: 1. The cul-de-sac shall comply with the adopted fire code and shall measure a minimum 40 feet from center of cul-de-sac to the center of the roadway. This will require a minimum 100 foot diameter; and 2. Fire hydrants shall be installed pursuant to NFP A 24 and spaced in accordance with Collier County Fire Prevention and Protection Code Policy and Procedure Article Numbers ffi7J 09-1, HYD 09-2, HYD 09-3 and HYD 09-4. The petitioner's agent the petitioner has revised the PUD document to include these items. Cope Reserve RPUD, PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, 2011 cepe Revised: 3/21/11 Page 5 of 17 Packet Page -2133- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. Zoning! Services Review: The Master Plan shows the location of the preserve are~ detention . areas mid the internal cul-de-sac roadway. The residential area is shown along both sides of the roadway. The residential areas can be developed with any combination of the uses proposed; there arF no delineations on the Master Plan to show specific areas that may be developed with a particular product type, such as detached single-family dwellings, townhouses or multi-family structurps. In all cases, the proposed property development regulations would govern where units w:ould be placed. Buffers are shown, with a note stating the buffer type, either 15 foot wide TyPe B or a 10 foot Wide Type A, will be determined when development approvals are sought-J.--Site Development Plan or Plat. The LDC requires a Type A buffer to separate single family uses from adjacent single-family development, and a Type B buffer to separate single- family Uses from multi-family uses, as shown below (within different projects not lot line to lot line wi(thin the same development). The proposed buffers are LDC compliant for the use separa~ons involved. ~(r o.c. 3 TYPE I A I BUFFER ,.- #10 SHRUBS, 4' o.c. (jj" H'!:GH AT ~L.ANnNG / ./ . TYPE 'B' BUFFER With tlJ.e setbacks proposed in Exhibit B of the PUD document, the Property Development Regula,tions Table, principal structures built within this project can be within 40 feet of the perime~er property line. (Note: Accessory uses could be within 6-10 feet depending upon whethdr the setback is a side or rear boundary.) ; FLUE !Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surro~ding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/densities on the subject site, the compatibility analysis might include a review of both the subject proposal and surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standatds (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and oJiientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location, traffic generapon/attraction, etc. There has to be a balance between the adjacent existing uses and what is allokable by the GMP. The FLUE designation for this site would allow the neighboring propertY owners as well as this applicant to seek much higher density that what is proposed in this pipject. The site is eligible for up to 7 dwelling units per acre, but the applicant is only seeking to develop at a density of three units per acre (see previous GMP discussion). . ! I Cope R~serve RPUD. PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7. 2011 cepe Revise~: 3/21/11 Page 6 of 17 Packet Page -2134- . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. However, the adjacent Estates zoning district is a much less intense zoning district and is in fact categorized as an Agricultural zoning district in the LDC nomenclature (LDC 2.02.02.A). The lots in this zoning district are much larger, with bigger setbacks than what is proposed within this development (see table above). The adjacent eastern tracts along Cope Lane are developed with single-family homes; there are no zero-lot line, townhouse or multi-family uses. As originally proposed., the homes in Cope Reserve could be as close as 155 feet from a three-story, 45-foot high multi-family structure (135' as shown below plus the proposed 20-foot rear setback for a multi-family structure). The master plan does indicate that a detention area will be located in the "comer," which will help separate the uses to some extent. That separation will soften the effects of this development upon the easternmost house, but as originally proposed., this development could have structures relatively close to the house in the middle. DEVELOPMENT COPE RESERVE RPUD ESTATES STANDARDS SINGLE rOWNHOME SINGLE MUl TI- Principal structW"es FAMilY FAMilY FAMilY DETACHED A IT ACHED & ZERO lOT LINE Minimum lot area 5,000 sf/unit 1,408 sf/unit 3,500 s.f. per N/A 2.25 ac unit1 Minimum lot 50 feet 16 feet 35 feet N/A 150 feet width2 Minimum floor 1,000 s.f 1,000 s.f 800 sJ 800 sJ 1 ,000 s.f. area Min front yard5 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 75 feet Min side yard 6 feet o feet or 6 o feet or 6 feee 7.5 feet 30 feet feee Min rear yard6 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 20 feet 75 feet Min preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 setback Min. Distance 12 feet 12 feet4 12 feet4 20 feet o feet between structures Max. Building height 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet Zoned 35 feet 40 feet 35 feet 40 feet 30 feet Actual 35 feet Not to exceed 3 stories 2 stories COMPARISON TABLE BETWEEN PROPOSED PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND THE ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS Cope Reserve RPUD. PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, 2011 CCPC Revised: 3/21/11 Page 7 of 17 Packet Page -2135- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . i I In resPonse to staff concerns, the petitioner has agreed to reduce the height to 35 feet zoned height 1(40 feet actual) for multi-family and townhouse units, provide a perimeter property setback. in addition to the side and rear setbacks for the houses located along Cope Lane-to the north ahd east of the subject site as .shown in the dotted line above. The petitioner has revised the PuP to include a 25-foot wide building setback for single-family detached structures and a 40-foot wide biilding setback for any structure other than a detached single family home. In addition, the petitiorier has agreed to provide an enhanced buffer in that same area should the subject site be develo~ed with townhouses or multi-family units. This enhanced buffer would be a C buffer type as! shown below. (Depictions are approximate) . .. I I I' "'. 0.0. ~ / / /-- #;0 S"'UBS. " 0.0 .0" KGH H ',Arm:.. i r'~ / /~"\ r'~ .C"_r-.......-.J='..-. '.-'" ._....--r-~....-.-.,_.,,\..., I ".-. /"~-'*'-~\" ! '.'-"-+.'-""-'V' .-.' .'-'...--.,:t.-..-iJ:..... "\ r r ." 4" ,...... ~"i . , x-=n-t' , .. 1 . , -. 1. .. 1 :.~;~. (j.._)., -,._}..j- . .!..__l..~) =-),._-:.1;.)..__. .,.'Si-.~),-_).-j,_~}.._;,j._j.,!..j.._. l"--"':']f" .j..-.. . j .::.' ...._)..:-~,._.:. -) , I ~~t~~-I I TYPE Ie. BUFFER [)O~)3~ = ~G\'V OF s~p..~GEQ=:; '7RE:5 i With tije reduced height, increased setbacks and enhanced buffer, staff is of the opinion that this project will beicompatible with the adjacent uses and zoning in that area shown. . i Cope Reserve RPUD, PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, ~011 eepe Revjse~: 3/21/11 Page 8 of 17 Packet Page -2136- . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking two deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The deviations are listed in PUD Exhibit E. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.0 that requires a local road right-of-way to be a minimum of 60 feet wide; to allow a 50-foot wide right-of-way for roadways within the development. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant provided the following justification for this deviation: The revised roadway width and cross-section are justified for the Cope Reserve RPUD due to the limited number of units served by the local street. The site does have native vegetation which must be retained and requiring additional right-oi-way that is unnecessary would only serve to further impact the developer's ability to retain and impact the least amount of native vegetation. The 50 foot wide local road cross-section is sufficient to accommodate necessary paving and utilities for the project and the 50 foot cross-section has been previously approved by the County as an acceptable width. Staff Analysis alld Recommendation: 1bis deviation would allow the developer to provide narrower roadways within the development. The HOA can control traffic via posted speed limits and project design. The petitioner could reduce the number of units proposed to accommodate the required right-of way, however because the roadways will not be county-maintained, staff does not object. Therefore, the deviation seems appropriate. Zoning and Land Develo-pment Review staff would recommend APPROVAL of this deviation. finding that. in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.B.A.3. the petitioner has demonstrated that lithe element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health. safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.B.B.5.h. the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "iustified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section Section 6.06.01.J, Street System Requirements, which limits cul-de-sacs to a maximum length of 1,000 feet to permit a cul-de-sac approximately 1,225 feet in length. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant provided the following justification for this deviation: The deviation is warranted due to the necessity to retain 2:i: acres of native vegetation in the largest contiguous configuration. Further, the County Transportation Department has requested project access from Cope Lane rather than County Barn Road If project access were provided from County Barn Road, the cul-de-sac would not exceed 1, 000 feet. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Having the access to serve this project on Cope Lane rather than County Barn Road will help preserve the capacity of County Barn Road to serve as a collector road. Staff does not object. Cope Reserve RPUD, PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, 2011 CCPC Revised: 3/21/11 Page 9 of 17 Packet Page -2137- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. Zoning :and Land Development Review staff would recommend APPROVAL of this deviation. finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3. the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element mav be waived without a detrimental effect on the health. safety and welfare of the commu.tnty" and LDC Section lO.02.13.B.5.h. the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "iustl.:fied as meeting public purposes to a delrree at least equivalent to literal application of such re~ations." . LDC S~bsection 10.03.05.1.2 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recoIl1II).endations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show tHat the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the followibg when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Pl~g Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additiot;ial criteria as also noted below. [Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold, non-i~cized font]: PUD Ftndines: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC ~hall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria" (Staff'S! responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): ! 1. iThe suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, If"nd other utilities. Staff ~as reviewed the proposed rezone and believes the uses and property development regula1[ions are compatible with the development approved in the area. The commitments made IJY the applicant provide adequate assurances that the proposed change will not advers~ly affect living conditions in the area. I . 2. iAdequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contra4ts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such; areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Docu~ents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office~ demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be requir~d to gain platting and/or site development approvaL Both processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of infras1!ucture will be provided by the developer. , 3. ! Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policie$ of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). ! CountY staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objecQves and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion and the zoning analysis of this s*ff report. Based on that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be . found ~onsistent with the overall GMP. I i Cope Reserve RPUD, PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 Page 10 of 17 April 7, *011 ccpe Revisedf 3/21/11 Packet Page -2138- . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. 4. 17'ze internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Staff has provided a review of the proposed uses and believes that the project will be compatible with the surrounding area. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Currently, the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. In addition, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure such as road capacity (with the limitation noted above), wastewater disposal system, and potable water supplies to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with pun regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The petitioner is seeking two deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06A). This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff believes the deviation proposed can be supported, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section lO.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the elements may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section lO.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Please refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report for a more extensive examination of the deviations. Cope Reserve RPUD, PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, 2011 CCPC Revised: 3/21/11 Page 11 of17 Packet Page -2139- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. Rezone:Findine:s: LDC Subsecti'On 10.03.05.L states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, . the rep~rt and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commi~sioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change ~ relation to the following when applicable" (Staff's resp'Onses t'O these criteria are pr'Ovideif. in b'Oldf'Ont): 1. 1fhether the pr'Op'Osed change will be c'Onsistent with the g'Oals, 'Objectives, & p'Olicies 'Of the Futqre Land Use Map and the elements 'Of the Gr'Owth 1I1anagement Plan. i The zo~ing analysis provides an in-depth review of the proposed changes. Staff is of the opinio~ that the project as proposed is consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the projecti to be compatible with neighborhood development. Staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. The petition can also be deemed consist~nt with the CCME. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP. I i 2. rhe existing land use pattern; i Staff ~as described the existing land use pattern in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed it at length in the zoning review analysis. Staff believes the proposed rezone is appropriate given the existing land use pattern. 3. :The p'Ossible creati'On 'Of an is'Olated district unrelated t'O adjacent and nearby districts; The prpposed PUD rezone) would not create an isolated zoning district because lands to the east (F~lling Waters) and lands to the north (Seacrest Upper and Lower School) are also zoned POO. . SEACREST ~?PE~ ,AND LOWER c0PE SCHOOL RESE:tVE (P) L1 I ~ '- Excerpt from PUD Map I 4. I Whether existing district b'Oundaries are ill'Ogically drawn in relati'On t'O existing c'Ondit~ons 'On the pr'Operty pr'Op'Osed f'Or change. i Staff i$ of the opinion that the proposed district boundaries are logically drawn, bringing the E$tates zoned land within the FLUE Urban Mixed Use District into a more urban zoning district. . ! Cope Reserve RPUD, PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, *011 CCPC Revise~: 3/21/11 Page 12 of 17 Packet Page -2140- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed rezone is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such the rezone to allow the owner the opportunity to development the land with uses other than what the existing zoning district would allow. Without rezoning, the Estates zoned tracts could not be developed with the proposed uses or with the proposed property development regulations. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely irifluence living conditions in the neighborhood; Staff is of the opinion that the proposed rezone, with the commitments made by the applicant, can been deemed consistent County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Therefore, the proposed rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. . The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time. The project will minimally increase traffic at the intersection of Cope Lane and County Barn Road. However, the vehicles entering and exiting this site will not be travelling past this subject tract's property eastern boundary (Cope Lane does not currently connect with any other public roads to the east-it dead ends at the Santa Barbara Boulevard extension), thus the roadway east, where other single-family home sites exist will be not impacted by passerby traffic. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; The proposed rezone should not create drainage or surface water problems because the LDC specifically addresses prerequisite development standards that are designed to reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. Additionally, the LDC and GMP have other specific regulations in place that will ensure review for drainage on new developments. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; If this petition were approved, any subsequent development would need to comply with the applicable LDC standards for development or as outlined in the PUD document. This project's property development regulations do not indicate that exceedingly tall structures would be included in the project; therefore the project should not significantly reduce light and air to adjacent areas; thus the development proposed, if approved, should not . negatively affect light and air permeation into adjacent areas. Cope Reserve RPUD. PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, 2011 CCPC Revised: 3/21/11 Page 13 of 17 Packet Page -2141- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; . This is ~ subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or extern~l to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors includiilg zoning; however zoning by itself mayor may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. There is no guarantee that the project will be market~d in a manner comparable to the surrounding developments. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjace~t property in accordance with existing regulations; The proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent propet1ies. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare; The proposed rezone does not constitute a grant of special privilege. 13. iWhether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; The property currently has a zoning designation of Estates. The tract could be developed . within ithe parameters of that zoning designation; however, the petitioner is seeking this rezone:in compliance with LDC provisions for such action. The petition can be evaluated and ac~on taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff believes the proposed rezone meets the intent of the PUD district and further, believes the public interest will be maintained. 14. iWhether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the Counry~' The p~titioner proposes to develop a maximum of 43 residential units (at a density of 3 units per acre). The units could be any combination of single-family or multi-family dwelling units. The petitioner has proposed property development regulations to allow establiShment of those uses. Staff is of the opinion that the development standards and the developer commitments ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the comm~nity if the Transportation Planning staff stipulations are adoptell 15. wHether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in distric~s already permitting such use. : There: may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; howev~r, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a partkcIlar zoning petition. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with . Cope Reserve RPUD, PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, ~011 CCPC Revised: 3/21/11 I I I Page 14 of 17 Packet Page -2142- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP as discussed in other portions of the staff report. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require considerable site alteration and this project would undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan or platting approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended . The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as it may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezone process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD document. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The NIM meeting was duly noticed by the applicant and held on September 30, 2010. D. Wayne Arnold, agent for the applicant opened the meeting at 5:35 p.m. In attendance was Kay Deselem representing Collier County. At the time the meeting began, four residents were in attendance. A sign-in sheet was provided at the entrance of the meeting room and three of the four attendees signed in. Aerial photographs of the site and surrounding area, and a copy of the conceptual site plan were displayed. Mr. Arnold gave a brief explanation of the rezone application, project location, and description of the proposed uses. Mr. Arnold requested that anyone in attendance wishing to obtain updated information about the project could provide his or her email address and his office would provide notice of the public hearing schedule. . Cope Reserve RPUD. PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, 2011 CCPC Revised: 3/21/11 Page 15 of 17 Packet Page -2143- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. Due to ithe size of the meeting, questions were allowed to be asked during the presentation. . Questiops raised were in regards to water management, landscape buffering, size of berm, improvements to Cope Lane, building types and heights, project density and compatibility with the slll1iounding area, hearing dates, zoning process and development time frames. Mr. Arnold addressed the water management preliminary design and requirements of the State and County, the lanclscape buffer types and widths adjacent to the residences on the northern boundary, Cope Lane iIhprovements and the proposed building heights. Ms. Deselem addressed the hearing process~ Cope Lane improvements and project density. Mr. ~old invited anyone with further questions to call his office or to contact Ms. Dese1em. The m~eting was adjourned at approximately 6:20 p.m. [Submitted by the petitioner's agent] ! i COUNtry ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: , The COPnty Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for this petition on March 17, 2011. I RECOivtMENDATION: ! z:~\~ and Land Development Review Services staff recommends that the Collier County PI . ,g Commission forward Petition PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 to the BCC with a recoIIl1'bendation of approval. ! i . i , i i I i I I I I I I I Cope R~serve RPUD. PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, 2011 CCPC Revised: 3/21/11 I 1 Packet Page -2144- . Page 16 of 17 . PREPARED BY: . . K au [) #.llL&11t.J KAY lJESELEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVIEWED BY: ~ 0: ~Jt---. RA YM0ND V. BELLOWS. ZONING MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Jl 1\ l' I ;;/' ,\' I --' ' ~ I~.kj/~.A_ ,..~~~ ~.LIAM D. LORENZ, W;P.E., DIRECTOR DEP ARTlvIENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPROVED BY: ~ /] / / J}/7 %'. ,/,,1'" / ,/ I {~/ II 10-1 ,~~./::4 _~ NICK tAS.A'r:"AAGuIl1A, BEPD~Y':'ADMINISTRATOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. --3/(5/1/ DATE "]- Ib- II DATE 03 -i7-'U:nr DATE /] ...' II - t../-il DATE Tentatively scheduled for the June 14, 2011 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Cope Reserve RPUD, PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 April 7, 2011 CCPC Revised: 3/18/11 Packet Page -2145- Page 17 of 17 , i I COLLIER CbUNTY GOVERNMENT I GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING l4ND REGULATION I I ~i Caffrey County ~~~~ 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.collierqov.net . : APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: I D A~ENDMENT TO PUD (PUDA) D PUD REZONE (PUDZ) D PUD TO PUD : REZONE (PUDZ-A) I ! ! PETITION NO PROJECTiNAME DATE PROCESSED PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 REV: 5 COPE RESERVE Project: 2005090021 Date: 9/24/2010 DUE: 10/22/10 ...- - I i i NAME OF ~PPLlCANT(S) HIGHLAND PROPERTIES OF LEE AND COLLIER. LTD. I ADDRESS 16980 SANDALWOOD LANE CITY NAPLES STATE FL ZIP 34109 TELEPHONJE # 239.566.2780 CELL # FAX # 239.263.7207 i - E-MAIL ADDRESS: APPLICANT INFORMATION . ! i i NAME OFIAGENT D. WAYNE ARNOLD. Q. GRADY MINOR AND ASSOCIATES. P.A. i ADDRESS!3800 VIA DEL REY CITY BONITA SPRINGS STATE FL ZIP 34134 I - TELEPHO~E # 239.947.1144 CELL # _ FAX # 239.947.0375 I E-MAIL ADDRESS:WARNOLD@GRADYMINOR.COM I I i NAME OF!AGENT RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH. ESQ.. COLEMAN. YOVANOVICH. & KOESTER. P.A. ! ADDRESS!4001 TAMIAMI TRAIL N.. SUITE 300 CITY NAPLES STATE FL ZIP 34103 I I TELEPHOtjJE # 239.435.3535 CELL # _ FAX # 239.435.1218 ! . E-MAIL AbDRESS:RYOVANOVICH@CYKLAWFIRM.COM I i I I I i I I I BE AWA~E THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACctORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE I REGULATIONS. . i I Revised May2QlO I I ! i , Packet Page -2146- . .::{ I"- ~ E Q) == ~ ~ o N - ~ ~ - CD . . Co e-r County .~~~1S COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DlVISIONI PLANNING AND REGULATION 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.collierQov.net ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.collierQov.net/lndex.aspx?paQe-774 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: FALLING WATERS MASTER ASSOCIATION. INC. MAILING ADDRESS 7200 DAVIS BLVD CITY NAPLES STATE FL ZIP 34104 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP Revised May2010 1 I i I ... -:...~~, 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. I j!'.~'"" i COrnel' County ! i ~~~~~ COLLIER CbUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE . I GROWTH MANAGEMENT DlVISIONI NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 I www.collierqov.net I i I I ," I I Disclosure of Interest Information I 1 i a. Ilf the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the ! entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an I ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use : additional sheets if necessary). I I %of I Name and Address Ownership I I I I b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the offi ce rs and . I stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. I I ! ! % of I Name and Address Ownership I 1 I I I I I I I i I I I I ! c. I If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the I i trust with the percentage of interest. I i I % of I I I I Name and Address Ownership I i 1 I I I i . j ! I I Revised May20iO ! I Packet Page -2148- ! I m ~ ~! 9>unty ~ - - - . COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION! NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.collier!:lov.net d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. %of Name and Address Ownership <C Highland Properties of Lee and Collier, Ltd., 6980 I"- Sandalwood Lane, Naples, FL 34109 ~ Samuel Hubschman, 491 Wedae Dr., Naples, 34103 33.33% E Teryl Bevrent, 5147 Seahorse Ave., Naples, 34103 33.33% Q) ....... ~ Harrison Hubschman, 6980 Sandalwood LN, Naples, ~ 34109 33.33% 0 N - -.::t ~ - If there is CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with individual to e. a an or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. . %of Name and Address Ownership Date of Contract: - f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. . Name and Address N/A . Revised May2010 -"t&'" ~4b..., Coin~r County ~~ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE . GROWTH I}JIANAGEMENT DIVISIONI NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNINq AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 i www.collieraov.net i g.1 Date subject property acquired fZI June 1986 Icased [;] Term of Icasc i yrs.jmos. I I I If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: i i i Date of option: _ i ! Date option terminates: _J or I 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. ! i Anticipated closing date _ I h.1 Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase I occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the I final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on I his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. I i I I i ! I . i i I I I I ! I I I I I I I ! I i i I I I I I Revised M3Y2JIO I i i i ! . Packet Page -2150- . ~ l'- ..- E Q) -t..J ..- ..- o N - oo:::t ..- - CD . __.r Co e-r County ~~~~~;;,.-,-.~ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.collierqov.net PROPERTY LOCATION Detailed leqal description of the property covered by the application: O.R. 1199, PAGE 849 THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, LESS THE NORTH 30 FEEf AND THE WEST 50 FEEf OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND O.R. 1200, PAGE 199 THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS 50 FEEf ALONG THE WEST LINE FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range 08 / 50S / 26E Lot: Block: Subdivision:- Plat Book ----:-- Page #: _ Property J.D. #: 00403200009 and 00403160000 Metes & Bounds Description: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTH QUARTER (1/4) CORNER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN NORTH 00.44'56" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 8, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1357.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN NORTH 89.17'58" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTH WEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 8, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,281.70 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COUNTY BARN ROAD A 100 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN NORTH 00.43'48" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 645.58 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COPE LANE A 60 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89.26'18" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 615.70 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00.48'22" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTH WEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 8 FOR A DISTANCE OF 308.54 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89.22'08" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 8, FOR A DISTANCE OF 665.42 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00.44'56" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 8, FOR A DISTANCE OF 339.35 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 14.315 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Size of property: ft. X _ ft. = Total Sq. Ft. _Acres 14.3+ Address/qeneral location of subiect property: The subiect propertv is located on the . _ southeast corner of Cope Lane and County Barn Road Revised May20 1 0 I i I I i I I ! i COLLIER ~OUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI PLANNINGI AND REGULATION i I I PUD Dist!rict (LDC 2.03.06): i i I I . Co~~r County 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.collierQov.net . C8J Residential o Commercial o Community Facilities o Industrial ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE . REZONE REQUEST Original ~UD Name: ____ Ordinance No.: ! i Zonin N S E W E P'iU.E., CU E: I EI I Dobs the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject prdperty? If so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If sp~ce is inadequate, attach on separate page). No I Section/township/Range _ / _ / _ Lot: ! Block: Subdivision: ---, - - Plat Bookl_ Page #: _ Property I.D. #: Metes & ~ounds Description: _ I i I i i This application is requesting a rezone from the E. Estates zoning district(s) to the RPUD. Cope Res~rve Residential Planned Unit Development zoning district(s). I I Present U~e of the Property: VACANT proposedl Use (or range of uses) of the property: Sinqle family detached. sinqle family I attached.!townhome and multi-familv dwellinq units. I I , I EVALUATION CRITERIA I I Pursuant Ito Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code, staff's . analysis j and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning commissIon's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based Revised May20iO I I I Packet Page -2152- I I I . Co =. BY County ~~-~""'~~~~ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI PLANNING AND REGULATION 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.collierQov.net describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section lO.02.13.B) The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 1. <( I"- ~ E Q) ..... ~ ~ 0 N - ~ ~ 2. - CD . . The surrounding area is developed with a variety of residential, community facility, and governmental service uses. Access to the project is proposed via Cope Lane at the intersection of Cope Lane and County Barn Road. Water, sewer and other utilities are available to serve the 43 unit project. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. The entire PUD is under unified control of the applicant. 3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) The proposed residential PUD is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Compliance with the various goals, policies and objectives is discussed in the Statement of Compliance Section of the PUD Document. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed PUD permits only residential dwelling units and accessory uses. Properties to the east and north are zoned estates and are developed with single family houses. The proposed project at a maximum density of 3 dwelling units per acre is compatible with existing development. The PUD master plan identifies the location of residential areas, as well as the buffers for the project. Revised May2010 -...1.:.. . /f~7' co1l1~-Y CoU11ty ~~~~,~~ 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. I I COLLIER gOUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION! PLANNINGIAND REGULATION 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.collier~ov.net 5. i I I Th~ adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. I Th~ LDC requires that residential only projects provide 60% of the project site as op$n space. The applicant has not requested a deviation from this requirement. I Th~ timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. I I Nebessary public infrastructure is presently in place to serve the proposed project. No! level of service impacts result from the 43 dwelling units proposed within the prdject. I Th~ ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate I . eX!i>anslOn. I ! 6. 7. I The proposed RPUD includes all properties under unified control of the applicant. Nol expansion plans are proposed beyond the limits of the subject 14.3z acre pr9perty. 8. co~formity with PUD regulations, or as to c!esirable modifications of such reQulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of I justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. I I Thd master plan and development standards proposed for the property are in keeping with standards previously authorized in other PUD's. All documents are prepared in a forrt, deemed legally sufficient by the County Attorney's Office. I i Deed !Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, howevjer, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the ci~ic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed . I. restn ~tl 0 n s. I I previolus land use petitions on the subiect property: To your knowledge, has a public heari~g been held on this property within the last year? DYes [g] No If so, tvhat was the nature of that hearing? _ OfficiAl Interpretations or Zoninq Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an offiCi~1 interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ID Yes !Xl No If so, rease prOVide copies. I Revised May2dlO I I I Packet Page -2154- I i i . . . . <X; I'- ..- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N - oo;;t ..- - CD . . oF ......~ 17t-.~~.; c_o~Jrer County =-~~"'-~~ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION! PLANNING AND REGULATION 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.collierQov.net NOTICE: This application will be considered "open" when the..determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supplv necessary information to continue processinq or otherwise activelv pursue the rezoninq for a period of six (6) months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re-opened by submitting a new application, repayment of all application fees and granting of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the project will be subject to the then current code. (LDC Section 10.03.05.Q.) Revised May2010 ! i I I I ! i COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI I PLANNING AND REGULATION I i -~ cJn.~-y County ~~ 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.collierqov.net i PUD AMENDMENT (PUDA) - PUD REZONE (PUDZ) - PUD to PUD REZONE (PUDZ-A) i APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST I THIS COMPLE'TED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN TIiE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW W ICOVER SHEETS ATrAl:HED TO EACH SECTION. NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. I REQUIREMENTS #OF NOT i COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRE[ I . . .. E U .. -:' -"....;.,~-.-:;,:......~.>".,.".....:...._.j......._..--'c..:...... .--'. STANDARDRQ IREMENTS:" . ...-->.----.-.-.-..-...---"... ..,--..... "',-' . '<"'".~ .=-"::': --. ~:.j.':'~-. :,.-, _~.~;-,: .:1::- ..~.)-::~~-':::;~:i:. .i~<.':'~~~-.~~".,;-"'" ~ ~:;'"'_::~:":~-'.'-': ~.:{~".r ~.:::,; C ". i -..: .~;". 1 Additional s~t if located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area) I Copies of det~i1ed descriotion ofwhv amendment is necessarY D 0 [gJ Completed Application with list of Permitted Uses; Development Standards D l8J D Table; List of proposed deviations from the LDC (if any); List of Developer commitmentsland Statement of Compliance narrative (download application from web for ~urrent form) PUD Conceptu;al Master Site Plan 24" x 36" and One 8 Yz" x 11" COpy D l8J D Revised ConcdPtual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 W' x 11" COPy D D ~ OriqinaI PUD doc/ord and Master Plan 24" x 36" - ONLY IF AMENDING THE PUD D D ~ Revised PUD application with chanqes crossed thru & underlined D D ~ Revised PUD abplication w/amended Title paqe wlord #'s, LDC 10.02.13.A.2 D D ~ Justification/R~tionale for the Deviations (must be on a separate sheet within the D l8J D application mq.terial; please DO NOT include it in the PUD documents) Copies of the~ollowlng:c>;:" .~. .~;~~..' >'~:;:';~::~;;~~,t~1d.::c~:0~~:;J:d';t.'(,.~i.:':' :<~~..<.- -.... . Deeds/Legal's! & Survey (if boundary of original PUD is amended) 3 ~ D List identifyin$ Owner & all parties of corporation 2 ~ D Owner/Affida~it signed & notarized I 2 l8J D Covenant of Uinified Control 2 l8J D Completed Ad:dressing checklist 2 ~ D EnvironmentaJ Impact Statement (EIS) and digital/electronic copy of EIS or ~ D exemption.ju tification 4 Historical sunley or waiver request 4 ~ D Utility Provisi9ns Statement w/sketches 4 ~ D Architectural qendering of proposed structures 4 D ~ Survey, signe~ & sealed 4 l8J D Traffic ImpactiStatement (TIS) with applicable fees. For TIS guidelines & 7 ~ D procedures refer to httu:/Iwww.colliergov.netlIndex.asux?uage=566 Recent Aerial Fhotograph (with habitat areas defined) min scaled 1 "=400' 5 ~ D Electronic cop~ of all documents in Word format and plans (CDRom or Diskette) 2 ~ D I Copy of Offici~llnterpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 0 ~ . . I If located in RFr..1U (Rural Frinqe Mixed Use) Receivinq Land Areas Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. Lacavera, State of Florida Division of Forestry @ 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan", LDC Section 2.03.08A2.a.(o)i.c. V........ \ ~1~~~~ _~ck ApplicantjAqent Signatur'e.. Date . ! I Revised MaY2010 I i I I Packet Page -2156- 6/14/2011/tem 17.A. . PUOZ_Z007-AR-1Z292 REV: 5 COPE RESERVE Project: Z005090021 Date:9!Z4!ZOlO OUE:10!ZZ!lO Cope Reserve RPUD Project Narrative The project Developer intends to create a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) of 43 dwelling units on 14.3+/- acres of land located in.Section 08, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The project access will be from Cope Lane, and the conceptual master plan identifies the proposed residential development tracts, proposed dry detention areas, and approximately 1.92 acres of retained native vegetation. The project proposes a single point of access to Cope Lane and the internal road network will consist of a single cuI de sac. The applicant has requested two deviations from the Land Development Code, both relate to the roadway standards for local cuI de sac streets. The Developer proposes to construct the cuI de sac within a 50' wide right-of-way in lieu of the standard 60' right-of-way cross section for local streets. The proposed 50' wide right-of-way cross-section is sufficient to provide for appropriate vehicular travel lanes, utilities, and sidewalk. The Developer has also requested that the cuI de sac exceed 1,000' in length due to the required access connection from Cope Lane as opposed to County Barn Road, and the need to provide an uninterrupted native vegetative preserve area. A more thorough discussion of the deviation request has been provided in the Deviation Exhibit to the RPUD. . The.site is undeveloped, and is presently zoned E, Estates. Surrounding properties are also zoned E, Estates; however the land use pattern immediately adjacent to the property contains a mixture of single family homes, as well as, community facility and essential services uses. The property to the north, across Cope Lane is owned by Collier County and is utilized as a storm water retention area Immediately to the South is the former Son Rise Church, which is now operated as the Eimerman Education Center. The Cope Reserve RPUD provides buffers and residential development standards appropriate for development of low density homes adjacent to both residential and non- residential land uses. The development of single family, two-family and townhomes on the subject property is compatible with the surrounding community. Growth Management Plan Consistency The development of Cope Reserve RPUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan. The Development will be consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations adopted pursuant to the Growth Management Plan, Future Land Use Element and other applicable regulations, unless deviations are authorized by the Board of County Commissioners. The entire 14.3:1: acres of the subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). The base residential density of 4 dwelling units per acre is reduced to a maximum on dwelling units per acre due to the project's adjacency to the . Page 1 of2 Cope Reserve RPUD Packet Page -2157- E (l) ...... i I Traf$c Congestion Zone. The pennitted residential density is calculated as 14.3 acres x 3 dwelling units per acre = 42.9 dwelling units. In accordance with the Density Rating Syst~m description in the Future Land Use Element, the total number of dwelling units may be rdunded up by one unit if the dwelling unit total yields a fraction of a unit 0.5 or greater. The total pennitted residential dwelling units within the Cope Reserve RPUD shall be 43 units~ I The burpose of the Urban Mixed Use Residential Subdistrict is to provide for a variety of resi~ntial and mixed-use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. The prop6sed residential density of the Cope Reserve RPUD is 3 dwelling units per acre and is consJstent with the maximum density permitted by the FLUE Density Rating System and is the~fore consistent with FLUE Policy 5.1. The project is compatible with and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLup. Policy 5.3 discourages urban sprawl by directing new development to the urban are~ of the County. The Cope Reserve RPUD is within the urban area and represents infill deve~opment which is consistent with Policy 5.3. I Sev~ral policies in the Future Land Use Element address community character and smart gro~ in Collier County. The Cope Reserve RPUD is a residential infill project consistent with! Goal 7 and its related objectives and policies. Policy 7.3 encourages projects to co~ect their local streets with adjoining neighborhoods. Due to the pattern of development c~ntly existing, direct interconnection to adjacent properties cannot be provided. Ho~ever, the connection to Cope Lane does provide for shared access of the direct roadway co~ection to County Barn Road; thereby eliminating another driveway on the County roadViay, which is consistent with Policy 7.3. The project will provide a sidewalk within the corr$unity for use by the residents, consistent with Policy 7.4 of the Future Land Use Element. i I The l proposed Cope Reserve RPUD provides for on-site native vegetation retention consistent with Policy 6.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Collfer County Growth Management Plan. The proposed master plan identifies apprhximately 1.92 acres of retained native vegetation, which represents 15% of the existing I nathre vegetation on the property. An Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared in s~pport of the RPUD master plan. No listed species have been identified on the site. I A ~raffic Impact Statement (TIS) has also been prepared in support of the proposed resi4ential rezoning application, which demonstrates that the adopted level of service for County Barn Road will operate an acceptable level of service consistent with Policy 1.3 of the transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. . .::( I'- "" "" "" o N - -.;:t "" - c.o . I 1 pagt 2 of2 Cop I Reserve RPUD I I i . . . . Details PaQe 1 ofl 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. {I Parcel No.11 00403~00009 " 5.6990 6.6239 'See Instructions for Calculations Amount ;~.._----_.~] ".,._~_~~~_=~~. r=~"~~ . ~-"-~ i Property Record r Sketches h Trim Notices 1 .--.. ...-. ...-.---.................... . .. ". .....- -.~ -...-.- ..._-.,~~.~~~~~-"==~, l I I i I 10: l i I J I ! nI I I ! I ! I ! l ~ I II Section , I I II Sub No. ! 11 i '11 Use Code ~ i I t I I ! I . , I I i f: I I [ \ t Current Ownership II Property Addressll NO SITE ADDRESS Owner Namell HIGHLAND PROP OF LEE & COLLIER Addressesl16980 SANDALWOOD LN City II NAPLES II zipl1341 09 - 514 $ 44,800.00 $ 5,500.00 I http://www.collierappraiser.com/RecordD~+~;l n~~')U ~~d,T~ fl. F olioID=0000000403200009 2/24/2011 Packet Page -2159- Statell FL Legal 8 50 26 W1/2 OF N1/2 OF S1/2 OF NE1/4 OF SW1/4 LESS N 30FT NO W 30FT RW, OR 1199 PG 849 For more than four lines of Legal Description please call the Property Appraiser's Office. 8 Township 50 Range 26 Acres Map No. 5B08 Strap No. 502608018.0005808 3.97 100 II ACREAGE HEADER II MISCELLANEOUS I':ii! '" I Je Millaae Rates School Other 94 268 2010 Final Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Latest Sales History If all Values shown below equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll $ 148,975.00 $ 0.00 $ 148,975.00 $ 0.00 $ 148,975.00 Date Book - Page 1199 -849 161 - 543 Land Value (+) Improved Value H Market Value (-) SOH Exempt Value & other Exemptions (=) Assessed Value (-) Homestead and other Exempt Value (=) Taxable Value (=) School Taxable Value (Used for School Taxes) $ 148,975.00 SOH = "Save Our Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. 06/1986 02/1964 The Information is Updated Weekly. <C '" ~ E Q) ...... ~ "t"""" o N - ~ ~ - <.0 I I ! i I I 1-_ ~ro~~r~~~~C~:d_ '-~lrSket~h~l!~im N;;tice~ -',_ I I ! I I t I Details ~. ~ Current Ownership Property Addressll NO SITE ADDRESS Parc~1 No.11 00403160000 I ; Owner ~ame Addr~sses I City I Legal 8 50 26 S1/2 OF S1/2 OF NE1/4 i I OF SW1/4. LESS W 50FT RIW ! I 9.63 AC OR 1200 PG 199 Page 1 ofl ~ ~ State I FL zip1134109.514 r I I Section! Range Acres II 8 26 9.24 , i Sub No~ 100 I ACREAGE HEADER I "'0 Use Code 99 I NON-AGRICULTURAL ACREAGE Map No. 5808 Strap No. 502608017.0005808 -'0 MillaCle Rates School I Other II Total I 5.6990 I 6.6239 l12.3229I "'See Instructions for Calculations Latest Sales History I 2010 Final Tax Roll ' (Subject to Change) I. Ilf all Values shown below equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll I,. I Land vaiue II $ 462,100.00 I (+) Improve~ Value II $ 0.00 I (=) Mark~t Value II $ 462.100.00 r, (-) SOH Ex~mpt Value & Other Exemptions II $ 0.00 J (=) Ass~sed Value II $ 462.100.00 I (-) Homest~ad and other Exempt Value II $ 0.00 II (=) TaxableiValue II $ 462,100.00 . (=) School Taxable Value (Used for School Taxes) II $ 462,100.00 I SOH = .Save bur Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment . . I I Increases. i I Date II I 06 11986 II Book. Page 1200 -199 The Information is Updated Weekly. Amount I $ 82,500.00 I . . I · i ! http://wwwj.collierappraiser.comIRecordDetail.asp?Map=No&F 01ioID=0000000403160000 2/24/2011 I i I L- . . . ~ 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly lmown as Folio Number 00403200009 and 00403160000. No Site Address (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally descnbed in Exb1bit A attached hereto. The property descnbed herein is the subject of an application for residential planned unit development (RPUD) zoning. We hereby designate Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson, .P.A.~ legal representatives thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the. property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the. site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant ,of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. . 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in . plUt, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. . 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incOlporated into covenants and res~ctions which run with tp.e land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. , / Owner Owner SAmu ~i-. Hltjs!;5c..Hm~A.1 Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Swam to (or affinned) and ,ub,mibed before me thE ~ P- day of ~.d . 2007 by ~~ '1J f~.(!..~ who is personally known to me or has produced' asidentifi"tion. (" ~ ~~~. OR ~ N~ot Public ::-. r _ ~ r ,111"'''" Betty Jo Robertson ~ T~o ~F\J ,\ ~'( T'u I, - 630. l~~~i" '~:": Commission ~ DD193:l2000g (Name typed, printed or stamped) : .: .. : . :~Tl\lre5: SIP. I ..\I' ,_;: '~""''''r "'1rl,:,,"~f sanded 1'hrU ',l"oF ~\\\\~ . .,--tic J>ond.in: Co" me. I III I ~ Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 1/22/07 PUDZ-2007 -AR-12292 COPE RESERVED D Pr~ect:2005090021 n~~~. nf"9/07DDDUE: 10/16/07 Packet Page -2161- REV: 1 COPE RESERVE RPUD . Exhibit A Legal Description E (1.) ...... 0.R.1199, PAGE 849 THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOU-r;HWEST 1/4. LESS THE NORTH 30.00 FEET AND THE WEST 30.00 FEET OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND: , 0.R.1200, PAGE 199 THE $OUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, SECl110N 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS 50.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. i I I I I i -! ~ l"- T""" T""" T""" o N - -.:;t T""" - <0 . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. ~ ~ ~ ~ fI) ~ ~ ~~U.n ~ ll:O~!: t!l tl.:;!: 5!i l? ~g ~8 e lli!5 ~~ l:l lZll.. is ~ ll: <( etr ~ ?t ~ ~i a:. ~ ...1 t: i!i u f.! c --~~-!5 l'l r....: :1"'" IQ t:: 0 1',: ::1 o..ii Ql ',4-" I LLI-~I '''I'.:r:~i ...~ III ... I ~: :: I 'Ill J :: ::1 ::-':, I ~~ :: I I::..:' 1111 ,::::1 o.~'lll ~'fU :~.~. I, ~: :: I ~ :::: 11,,,11 ~ I'::: I ." II a.:.: :.: I ,,' ! : ~ I J " -..r J r~l . ' ~ ~ ~ I . !Ji>' ::ii ~:- I . , i ; i ;::-.:: Ii: , " J'I I ~~ . :': I.....~;;:<,.. : jf1J'1nz"E >>I.M' !; '.. _ ~ ~ ~ I I 11~" " '-~ '''';- : :f~" i i J, . or, i: I : ~.~~~. ~ ~ ' ';~I ,", ,!I,I',: ..,,,, iF! & ~~;: I. l' ;.. ~ I ::: I, 1 I I III ; ".' ~ '-. ". '.. '+i; r-l", I !fiI]'! '" , ~ : II! I I :: : I : ~ /1 ~ ~ I I ::: I : i'l ~, ~~ I I it : ~ : ~ (3.: I I il:11 : II '~, ~ ~ I ! ': , " I I ... --~ I .11 : 1'1 Iii I,:,',': .,'1 ~ I ""f' ",'Ii, 1.:,' <" ....' ~ 'f'~j ~~.~. fi I I ::: I: .. "G. I :'\ l~:~'iii; : : di ~ .~ I,ll ' I" · ,', I ' ;~ I :'! ~. I ; .Ii -il "" , '-'i ': II~. ~~ Km l~L~.._ '.\}lj [,,'~ . .~.. - - - ~ = = = = = = : -'~:':~::-~~~-:- ::: J,:j.~ ;'f~~; ~:~~~tt.: ~~ - ~-~.~-~:~ ~ ~~::':...:;~ ~ .~~ /~ .:; /~I'::~f - - - -- L. avo~ M:JrB )JNf1O:J l~-:oi-' I()~ J:: ", _0' ~i~ ~H~~~~~~. ~i fi> ~ ;! . l'illt,hoto.'1 u. , ;: ".~ ~I .. ~ U . ,-- t a;:. k'- drh.t: ~l:: .~ I ~ I t .~" i:~ ~ I~~'i'~~ih.~g!=::~i Sv i ~:;c: i= i !! ~ . .~ii m . H~~!.~.~~ud'~i J I i~ . ~!s i il'tU!'i1~P~!~i~ II 1 f ~ ;~; . .~ i I~ 1 :1 h .,~. ~i~~~~~ i~f ~ !~S~ :!~ Ie i I . .' I i"S . ~I ! l t g i;i H i b~_~lri~ l-~ e ",,1;.1 ~l$t i . . .,~( L :;eo) ~.x~ it~ e~i:;3~~i~i.~;~ ~~ . j ! 2 !~i . t~ ~ Clio: ~If~ .l'l i::~ ~:d l.b ;::~h5~~i'Erh:t~~! i~.. ;:5 i ~ ,- ~H ! I. t. . S .. u ~~ Stl~ lOr;.... k8b~ C :l:rt.S .. ! r! . (, ._j [ :;~~ J ~!tr: l~i~!1.i~.~ ~~~~I t~ iii ~ ~~ ~ . I , i:~ I l~;~~:~ j~~~!~~ ~~.~~! if ! ii .t . ~i . ..,-' ~~ . ~H ~ -v ~lil= . ~mmmmmm a~ . !: . ~j Ii t.;:~ ~~ :1 b ~i ~:. 1 :~l ~=:! {' 5 i.~ !~ ~ii ~ '=Y. :-; ~I j~ ~ ~~ f l' . ~.. :: ::j: l~ i~ )'~ l ;~ ~i~ ~ .. ~- Ihhll!:.l::":;C'!'~~":"'h~ o ,I ~~~ 1. :;e ._ ,0 .., ., .. :. . e t s ~I i Ii: ~ ;:: l 15 ~ " , · 'lit ~ 0 :~ ..~ ! ~j Ii ~ i \;l ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ to IJ.~ MAWAN - -~-~--- -r --T---~-----..... CQ '0 1 I ~ -t.-,NlIQlJ1fJrlI!IIS:MIJDJrt:J .srJlt' ~ "',lll2S ~.-- ~$' ." w;;1 ~ ~ . I I , I I I I I ! I I I I I I i I I J I I I I ~If I :s, ~ I ~;i ~ ~I ~ ... Ii FI tl . '. .. -. !> ...5 <" m i~ . --z- ~: >>- .. Packet Page -2163- il ~, ~~ ~ I - " . ~ . ~ !2 5~ n ~~ I !I)-g I ~Ih I -s I tJ ~t Q. '" f:l il. i ~ -q: ~Il. : ~ ~ ~i! : a ll:nlq ~!!. IS ~~ ~ !I~ ! ;S ii1! ! ;:; ~i . c::;.g I ~ . 5 iJ ~ ~ II i .. u in!~ u~ J! btt'. ....,~ ~I n~ ~~~, ~ ~~:~~~OClOO~I"'.o: ./.; - .... .. . :'.. <:?A.;JF/.f'\.}]~D':rf=-~:tv~elfT'-:-:- . -' .' -. . .. . .'. .-'~ '.'"'' . . . ~ -.;, - . - .:. -' ." .- ,.q - .' :' . .. ~.;.tt. ::;~;}~[:~f~,f~~;;t~.W::01.: . .!... ~ 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. PUDZ-2007-AR-ILL::IL KI::V: 1 COPE RESERVED D Pr~ect:2005090021 Date: 9/18/07DDDUE: 10/16/07 . -,..- --_...:::~-:n;._~ .- , ....,---~~ ! We/I, Hibhland Properties of Lee and Collier. Ltd. being first duly sworn, depose and say !that well ami are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subj~ct matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and oth~r supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are hon~st and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We/I understand that the infotmation requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the !content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be laltered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed icomplete, and all required information has been submitted. I i I As prop~rty owner Well further authorize o. Grady Minor and Associates. P.A. and Goodlette. Coleman and Johnson. P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters Iregarding this Petition. I j i -------~------------------ ~--------------------- Signatur~ of Property Owner Signature of Property Owner . I I ~~ A.NLll S J-. i-I Lx.. e.s (!.. H /l1 A ^' Typed of Printed Name of Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner I I i I I I The fore:going instrument was acknowledged before me this ~cf"t- day of i ALLOiJ.'5h- ,2007, by gAmlJ...Ek. I-f-LL~SC.J-fyt\Fl.u who is . "I I personajlY known to me or has produced as identification. - ' i I State of liD rid a - ~~~~ County ~f Collier Florida) I ,.\,~~~..Jy;:" Betty Jo Robertsoo~ ~K4--~~~_~_~_~I~~__- {i~"').:.1"~'~commis5iOll~DD3563 " (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned S~: E!ll :':::.xplre.s: SIP. 19. 20\18 . ".:r.;;'f~..,~i?~.r Bonded Th-~ Name of Notary Public) "'IIf.~\l\\'" Atl.alltie Bonding co., lllc:. I Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 1/22/07 Packet Page -2164- i I . ~ f'- ~ E Q.) ..... ~ ~ o N - """" ~ - <.0 . . V'(~D(~UUI ~nu ~b!~~ F~ 239~47037S ~001/003 COll..IER COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDRESSING DEPARTMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 Please complete the following and fax to the Addressing Department at 239-659-5724 Dr submit in person to the AddressIng Department at the above address. _ Form must be sIgned by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting. Not all items will apply to every projeot. Items In bold type are required. Form$ older than G months will require addllional review and approval by the Addre$sing Department. PEITmON TIP!: (check petition type br:fow, comp/ste 8 separate Addressing Checklist for eaoh Petition Type) o 81.. (J:iJastlng PermIt) o BD (Boat Dock extension) o CamivallCfrcus Permit o CU (Contiition~1 Use) o EXp. (Excavation Permit) . o FP (Anal Plat o l..lA (Lot UneAdjustment) o PNC (Project Name Change) o PPL (Plans & Plat Review) o PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) 181 PUD Re:z:one o RZ (Standard Rezone) DSDP (Site Development Plan) o SDPA (SDP Amendment) o SDPI.<lnsubslantJaI Change to SDP} o SIP (Site Improvemenl r'lan) o SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) o SNR (str~et Name Change) o SNC (street Name Change - Unplatted) o TDR (rranst'er of Development Rights) o VA (Variance) .0 VRP (VegetatIon Removal Permit) o VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fm Permit) o OTHER !WI J!! I "\.11 I I l FOLIO (Property 10) NUMBER(s} of above (attach to, or associate with. legal description if more than one) 00403200009 and 0040316000D STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) No Site AddreSs · L.OCATION MAP must be attached showing exact locatIon of projeot/slte in relation to nearest public: road right--of~way · SURVEY (ooPY - needed only for unplattect properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if spp/loable) Cope Reserve RPUD PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if appficabJ.e) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP Or AR# REV: 1 PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 COPE RESERVED D Project: 2005090021 --~ Date: 9/18/0700DUE: 10/16/07 1 0 G( '-'-. ~ (elF, '1~~ 1~) ----- --., ....-..-...._~ i UII~b/~UU' ~BU ~~:34 ~AX 2399470375 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. ~002/003 . ADDRESSING CHECKLIST - PAGE TINO I Project or d.Looment names pro]lO$ed lor, or already app.aring in, oondominlum cIocum_ (II appftcaaDn; Indica.. whether pro~osed or existing} i F'roposed ortiect name is Cope Reserve RPUD Plea~ Chec~ One: r2J Checklist is to be Faxed back 0 Personany Pioked Up I i APPLICANT! NAME;: Sharon Umoenhour PHONE: 239-947-114-4 FAX: 239-947-0375 I i . Signature hn Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to ~urther review by the Addressing Department. ;1(,]1" ,~ , FORSTAFFjUSe ONI.Y Primary NudtbGr 9 Z. 99 I I Address Nu~ber q"?:>o 0 I I Address Number I Addrass NUrbElf . I Approved b1: il..n.~ . (YllSj:.o.. "'^ ! Updated by:j I i i I I I I I I I I i i I I I I I I G:\Cll1TerlLlAppllbtlOl'l Fonns\Addr~g Che::ldlst rev 020207.doe ! I I I I I I I . Date: ~- Z-1-0J i I' I Pat~: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHSr FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Page 2 of2 . Packet Page -2166- . - . . . _........._... ...... .-;......;.___._.......~.c.r... . .... ... . . . ., . "_ '. __ _._..--.a.,.-r:'V'.~. ' .' :b' ...., ...._~~..;,..:-". 'j . - . -:. ,0 100,9528 'CO\.;\.:IER COUNTY .1986 JUN 11 PH 12: II I RECORDED {I01200 OR BOOK :000199 [~XG'E! <C l'- ..- This instrument prepared by and _____~when recorded return to: - ~F James W. Elkins, P.A. 1000 Tamiami Trail No., 1303 Naples, FL 33940 REC ~ 1-813-263-0910 DOC V/;.".~O I!:IT _ GENERAL WARRANTY DEED Wlt.LETT E. WENTZEL, JR., the Grantor, in consideration of the sum of $82,500.00 received from HDBSCHMAN ASSOCIATES, LTD. a Florida-Limited Partnership, the Grantee, of 3451 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 33962, hereby, on this ~ June 1986, sells, bargains and conveys in fee simple to the Grantee, and the Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the real property in Collier County, Florida, described E <D ..... The South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, less 50 feet along West line for right-of-way, Collier County, Florida~ ..- ..- o N - ~ ..- - (D 3. 4. . This deed 1. e subdivision, ate to reim- 2. 3. 4. . 5. 1 '" . .; .::.~::.~.~l~Jf~~~(.." . , PUOz -2007 -AR-12292 CO~E RESERVED D REV: 1 Project: 2005090021 Date: 911810700DUE' 1 . 0/16/07 . ". . ~ ". .... i I ..~ir~- tn~~-..j . l.. ~ i , ! _ . .'_ . _' _ _ . im 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. ~.-:J~ " .... '.~--="T..~;;;i--.,.,::.:;:~____~~~;:!~'.a-~:..j\')~,-,:?,~::,~~t&"Jf~"'" 001200 OR BOOK 000200 , P-AfiEi . STATB OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I hereby certify that on this day, before me, a Notary Public duly authorized in the state and county named above to take acknowledgments, personally appeared WILLETT E. WENTZEL, JR. to me known to be the person{s) described as Grantor in and who executed the foregoing warranty deed, and acknowledged before me that said person{s) executed that warranty deed. Witness my hand and official seal in the county and State named above this .1S2- June 1986. .".., {Notary Expires: (Date) is . Date: ~lIfr-I"'.e ,,"...:~~oI ~~c~lla~on.Ojl.". ;.>>aX ut grwn CoMI'I 2 _.: _ '~:::~-.:.'-;~} .'.::'~~.\r: ';~;~/ ::" :'. :~::~. :". :-. . ". .... .... . ., 0.. . _ _ :.0 0._ _ -.....T " - ." . -I". . " .. ..". . - -.-- ". . ._ 00 .- - {~~;': ."~' . . '.- o. 0"' .. .-. . . . . . '-~~'.~::~:" . . ..' . -. . . .... " . '. ., . _0- Packet Page -2168- , Division of Corporations Page 10ft . <C I'- 't'""" E Q) ..... 't'""" 't'""" o N - ~ 't'""" - (Q . . L...- _._..___ ffiGHLAND PROPERTIES OF LEE AND "COLLIER, LIMITED Document Number A26738 Date Filed 07/14/1988 Effective Date None Status Active EVENT TYPE FILED DATE EFFECTIVE DATE DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NAME CHANGE AMENDMENT 06/07/1995 OLD NAME WAS : HUBSCHMAN ASSOCIATES LIMTED THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT http://ccfcorp.dos.state.fl.us/scripts/corevt.exe?al =DETNAM&n1 =A26738&n2=DOMLP 8/10/2006 ; Details I P".....'" 1 ".f 1 i i 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. I I i i IBliI I I - -" - ~. -;: '" i Current Ownership . I I F~lio No.1I 00403160000 Mmd Property Addressll NO SITE ADDRESS I I I Owner Namell HIGHLAND PROP OF LEE & COLLIER I I Addresses II 2223 TRADE CENTER WAY I I i cityll NAPLES II Statell FL II zipl!34109 - 2035 I I Legal I 85026 S1/2 OF S1/2 OF NE1/4 I I OF SW1/4, LESS W 50FT RIW I I 9.63 AC OR 1200 PG 199 I i Section II Township II Range I Acres II Map No. U Strap No. I 08 ! II 50 II 26 I 9.63 II 5808 M 502608017.0005808 I ! I Sub N~. II 100 II ACREAGE HEADER II '11 Millaae Area II JfJ~ I I '11 Use C6de II 99 II NON-AGRICULTURAL ACREAGE II 268 I 13.3115 I I 2004 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History i i I . I I Land Val~e ~ $ 385,200.00 II Date II Book - Page II Amount I I (+) Improve~ Value n $ 0.00 II 06/1986011 1200 -199 II $ 82,500.00 I I c=) Marke~ Value II $ 385,200.00 I C-) SOH Exempt Value $0.00 c=) Asse~sed Value $ 385,200.00 C-) Homestead and other Exempt Value $0.00 . C=) Taxa~le Value $ 385,200.00 SOH - .Save Our Homes. exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. I I ; ; i i I -- I .. . ." i I The Information Is Updated Weekly. i i I I i I I I I : I I I I I . I I I I http://w1.collierappraiser.comlRecordD( Packet Page -2170- 100000403160000 1/6/2005 I i . ~ I"- 't'- E Q) ....... 't'- 't'- o N - oo::t 't'- - <.0 . . COPE RESERVE RPUD AR-12292 List Identifying Owners and Percentage of Ownership Highland Properties of Lee and Collier, Limited 6980 Sandalwood Lane Naples, FL 34109 Samuel Hubschman 33.33% Tervl Beyrent 33.33% Harrison Hubschman 33.33% Owner Listdoc PUDZ-2007-AR_12292 REV' 5 COPE RESERVE . Project: 2005090021 Date: 9/24/2010 DUE; 10/22/10 HUBPUD I i I i ! i I I 2006 iLlMiTEO PARTNERSHIP ANNUAL REPORT _ Due By May 1, 2006 DOCUMENT #A26738 t. Entlly Namei HIGHLANtp PROPERTlES OF LEE ANO COlLlER, LIMITED ! 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. PrinCljlal P1ace:of Buslnesli 2m TRADE tENTER WAY NAPlES. Fl ~4 109 I i FILED Mar 20,2006 08:00 AM. Secretary of State l\Ialllrll/ AllClT&S$ ZZZHRADE CENTER WAY NAPLES, Fl 34109 ! i I I ! DP NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE l~l!~~ ~lf~~ ~lIlllmmml m~lm~ ml~~ II IIII OZ252DCS No Cha-I.P CR2EOO3 (11105) Applied Far NotApp~CBbIB $8.T5 AlllllUDnBl fee R~red o 4. FEl NIImtnlr 59-2270049 ~. Cenlncale ot SlalUs DaslraCl I SIESKY, J1PfES H 1000 M. TA"",1AM1 TR. SUITE 2011 NAPLES, Ft 3394a I i II. lna abOve !lamed 6OUl}'l><Itlmnall1ls slalBmel'lllor 1/18 purpc<s& 0{ chan~ing 1\,. registered ollice Of r~lSlsred agent. or bollt. In lhe Slale of FlOlIda. I am terr1.larwlUl. 1lrY.l ~pt !he obtlgaUOn& Of reglslelE'll SQanL i SIGNATURE ! ~n--. typoClOf pt'IIIO<I MtOOof~ooCIf~I'" m"'<< ~... DItTE DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE FILE NOWttt FEE IS $500.00 ( InnOD04-?5r'S8 Aftor May 1, 2006, Fe& wfll b'IIl $91)0.1)1) ~ I ,I -, ii' t::; A. GENER.~ PARTNeR THAT 15 A BUSINESS SNTtlY MUST ~ REGISTERED AND ACTIVE wrm THIS OffiCe. NOTE: Gen.ral partnen MAY NOT be changtd on tn. fcnn; 81\ amenc!m6nt must be meCf to change a general ~er. 12. GENERAL PARfNER INFORMATCON DOroI.IOU I i IIMIE :HUBSCHMAN. SAMUEl. smm AClll(SS '2140 HAWKS RlOGE DRIVE. #1'17ro tlIHHll' !NAFLES. FL 3410S. 00ClMJlT , , ILIJdi: ! HUBSCHMAN. ALBERT Sll'iitTNlilllESS 1525 SOLL STREET I tny.sf-Zll' INAt'LES, FL 34100 DllClMNi I I IlI/,lC ' BEYRENT. TER\'L srrm ~1Xl1lt3S 15147 SEAHORSE AVE. CllHT-ZIP : NAPLES, F1. 34'l03 IlOCUIoCil<r I H1l!.lt w mm N1iIi11ZS ffi CllHl-W :J: x o w :x: o ~ 02 DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE HU6SCHMAN,HARR1SON 101 CARICA ROAD NAl"LES, Ft. 341W 1ltIC\lWIf f ~ Slll'".ct~ IlllY.Sf-ZIl' ~, IWIZ: snm All!ll'ES$ CITf.Sf-ZV' 14. I hereby betllly lhat lhe InlDlll'lellon llUp))li!!, tl wllh 1hls flr~ CoBS rot Qualfy for tho BK!lmptlons oonlBinad In Cltapter 119. flDlldB 5t11Mes. 1l\lr1hSl celllly Illa'. the lrIforma:!on Indicllled 'Cl1lhis lapollls llUe and e:ocurete lIl1d that my slgrtalura ehslf have !he Sll1l:e Is,gallllfec1 BS If maDe unaer oaCh; (/laC t em II.Jilstllm:C Pl1!01et" or lhllll'!1lt~ ~rsh!p Qr lh9 t11Ve1 <l! 1rUSlee empowerlld to elret;tlls Illls repolt IlS required by Chapter SZO. florida. Statutes - L SIGNAtURE: ~~ - ~ Ip?fo~ f)..~q -.5&(r~'18b i ~TtP~DDlt1'lllllTCt)H1ImD7'smIll1lG<ID\~IW-~EIt Il3lo ~l'rcnol PUDZ-2007 -AR-12292 COPE RESERVED 0:Project: 2005090021 Date: 9/18/07DDDUE: 10/16/07 REV: 1 f/N!.tl tSoJ.J +Iv BSC-f/'lflfW . Packet Page -2172- . ~ .--~..: ....~~...~...--:--:-~:~-:-._..-':"'.:~ . "..,:"' . \""~;?6:':"~" 0;~;9:~~' 'llOO~:~ ~ ~ 52 0011 H "RECORDED . .0Ir1UiG1C ~O~L\E-R COUNT:l f."' . .... ..... ...;...._.. -' . :D'OO~;~9 r~~\ WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Is made thIs ~ dny of May , 1988, betweon BRUNO A. PENZa grantor and HUBSCHMAN ASSOCIATES, LTD., a Florida limited pll1"tnershlp, grantee, whose post ofrtce address Is 3451 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 33962 E Q) ..... The grantor, In consideration of the sum of TBN DOLLARS ($10.00), and other good and valuable considerations paid by the grantee to the grantor, the receipt of which Is hereby aclmowleclged, hereby conveys to grantee, the following described renl property In Collier County, FlorIda: REC ~ ~ DO\~'" do (1) The West 1/'1. of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the I~T _ Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4, less the North 30 feet and the West 50 feet, of Sectlon 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, CoUler County, FlorIda. Grantor covenants with grantee, that at the time of delivery of this deed that the property is Cree of all encumbrances, that lawful seisin of, and good right and title to convey, that property is vested In the grantor, that grantee shall have the peaceable and quiet possessIon of the property, and that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and wID defend the same against the lawful claims of nIl persons whomsoever; except that this deed is subject to the followinlr. .::( I'- ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ - CO My Commission Eltplres: 1. . '!tOl"AP.'i ~oaOC ~AlE OF FlOM>1i MY COI,\/^ISSIOl'l fJ(P1~ OCT. 3 l,d6 IlONDiD THW (;lNw.l.IN5Ul.Alia liNg --?> siesky I Lehman & Espey, P .A. d. Received $ ~ 31t-. Dc.cumentory Stomp Tax Cc!licr Ccunty, Flori a ~.- ~D.'T . Imr0623 -_Y.""", .., OUklDlIlWlre'" D~ ~~ ' ..... ., CftuU Irl PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 REV: 1 COPE RESERVED D Project: 2005090021 Date: 9/18/07DDDUE: 10/16107 ;~~;\~!fqf;;;;,ti#A% - i ! Division of Corpofations 6/14/2011 Item 17.A.. i i I i I I I . ! IDGHLAND PROPERTIES OF LEE.AND COLLIER, LIMITED I . Document Number i A26738 Date Filed 07/14/1988 Effective Date None Status Active EVENT TYPE FILED EFFECTIVE DESCRIPTION i DATE DATE ; -----j----------------------------------------------------------------------- I ; NAME CHANGE AMENDMENT 06/07/1995 OLD NAME WAS : HOBSCHMAN ASSOCIATES LIMTED . THIS ~S NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT i j :{ :-~;.i'_~i.:.=:-" ",:'~~?~ i:~.~~~.;4;~:::~2~~~~~ 1~~~~~ :.~" ~,'"H'.~r',~r.!!11\~8;JlJ ~JQ '~d BtF.t~ Ii ~",,",'.;;' . ~.i' ~J.:~,~~;~.:.~;: ~~~.~~s;:1-:;;:~~~~-~.1~f~ ~~:1iLZi: t::~~~}in:i~;.~:Xi;~~;ti!:~ { y.!,.::..~t~'~.i~4'i.Y.,~~W!,f,!i'--~~~.'; .t~;:If~id.~.~I!;~;g:fi:\~~fs~~;~ ~.~ ~.;;\~'i~:;'s~ . . _ _ . Packet Page -2174-____ _ _ _ __ __ ., << r-- ~ E Q) ..oJ ~ ~ o N - ~ ~ - CD . . lJetails Current Ownership Folio No.11 00403200009 Map II Property Addressll NO SITE ADDRESS Owner Name HIGHLAND PROP OF LEE & COLLIER Addresse 2223 TRADE CENTER WAY City NAPLES I State II FL Section 08 Acres 4.32 Page 1 of! zipl134109 - 2035 Legal I B 50 26 W1/2 OF N1/2 OF S1/2 F NE1/4 OF SW1/4 LESS N 30FT AND W 30FT RW, OR 1199 PG 849 *For more than four lines of Legal Description please call the Property Appraiser's Office. Map No. 5808 "1,; MilIaae Area 268 800k - Page 1199.849 http://www.collierappraiser.com/RecordDetail.asp?F olioID=0000000403 200009 Sub No. II ~ Use Code II I ACREAGE HEADER I NON-AGRICULTURAL ACREAGE 100 99 2004 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History Land Value II $ 129,600.00 I (+) Improved Value II $ 0.00 I (=) Market Value " $ 129,600.00 I (-) SOH Exempt Value II $ 0.00 I (=) Assessed Value II $ 129,600.00 I I (-) Homestead and other Exempt Value II $ 0.00 I I (=) Taxable Value II $129,600.00 I SOH = "Save Our Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. _..' The Information is Updated Weekly. II Strap No. I ~ 50260B 018.0005808 I '1l MiI1aae 13.3115 Amount $ 44,800.00 1/6/2005 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. i i I I i I hereby cer6fy that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did give ; notice by mall to the following property owners and or condominium and civic associations whose members I may be impa~ted by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or condition~ use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requir~ment, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls ofC~llier County and any other persons or entities who have made aformal request of the county to be I notified. Th9 said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, an~ place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. I I I I I Per attached l~tters and or prop' 0 r's list, which are hereby , Affidavitofdompliance I . I I I I I I I I i State of Florida County of Collier i I I I The foregoin~ Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 14th day of September, 2010 by ! Sharon l{mpenhour, who IS personally known to me or who has Qia h1~. (Signature oflNotary Public) AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE PlnO~2007-AJl-12292 Cope Reserve RPUD as identification. I Pamela M. HWti Printed Name 10fNotary (Notary Seal) PAM8.A M. HYYTI 1....'1' COM1.lISSIQN ~ DD 87m1 EXPIRES: May 24,2013 E~ll(led Thru NolaJy pubrr. Undenwllers Packet Page -2176- . c::t; f'- ~ E Q) ...... ~ ~ o N - ~ ~ - <.0 ~ .~ u . if: ~!~~~EeE~~EEeEEi~i~g~~!i :E;! ai5a::;;:~ _.wC'llD......_...N.N ~N~. __________~NN~_a"_~ ..mN~...__NNNN ~~~~i!!i!!!!~~~S~~~~~~5m ~~~ii~ii~i~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~~=~~ "'~.. :>z.. 6~6~z~~ ~ ~ ~ ~!!! - 0mm00~m00~ ~ ~ %~ ~ ZZZZZZZZZZ~DQ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ <s335335~5ouu~ ~ ~ !:>~ om~ ~<o ~~~~~~~~~~~SS~<~ uS !~~Zg~~0Z~0~~ >O~ w~~~~~~ww~<~~f~%w~- ~~~~<BO~g~~~~ ~~~~5i~~~~~~ff~~~s~~~gi~~~~~ffi~~~~~ii~~ o W d II: ~ 2 ~ ~ i ~ " ~ u .... " z ~ 0 zz ~ c ~~ ., z ~ 9 aa i ~ ~ ~ a W z z " ii: ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~ "'.,., C10DOOD EEt! ~~ii5Ea t; 1!!e!~ wwwwww II: ...~............. !i: !S ".... """'CD0C7.1CO a: tUwwwwwwwWw " " ~~~~~~~~~~i a iil '" w'" '" .. W :i!:ll ~~ " ~ .. ogoooooooo:.:: ~ " !:i~!:i!:i!:i!::i!:;!:i!:i~~ lUll: ~ .. a "U ~ .. ~ l!!w W ..'" ~l!! ::J :> UUnH~U~ IZ~ 0 ~ ii U II: ~ .. ~1!; ! ., OlntnlnVlvtlnDIlnCllftlD ~~ fl 0 0 ~~ ____._...........N 5 ... 0::............................ ~ a ~ II: " ~ 3 ~8o C1J o ,. {U ft - 0" ~ ~ l!! ~ ~ ~ D: ;~ :: z ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~o ~..~ u~~ ~t; ~ ~ g~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~3 ~;e~~~~D~~<<~ w~~~~m0~0~~~m~ODC<<o> ~~w S~>=~5D< CD >za~z~~z~~~~~~s~~gu~~ i~~~z~~~~zz~3g8 ~~~~S55S5~5555<mm<~~...~~~~~~~~5lli~~~~~~ ~W0%~~~~~~~~~~~$$>~WGK<wCCO~OU~DU~O~~ rnf~~ow~w~~~~~~~5~~~~3~o>~20X~U$$XOffiUoo ~~c_~~-~~~~~~~~~DD~3mNm~~<~~o=u~~~~gX% z~i~~j~~S3$3~~S~~~i~~~2~~~~~==~~R~~~~~ ~g;;1 ~.,.. "'~_UI ~~~~Sim w5;;;;~;Bie~a~3ia ::;:~!:! ...,~ ~gt:~ ~..- NrlWIII'I ..............W11W111"1 ~....ODO....~....lD...DI.... ~~~5 ~i~ N~a_at&DNNNNN... ...Nmm_,.. N_N. III .......010.......____.,. :;::e~~;:;:=::::::;:;= ;r;-""'" ~~i:;;:;~i~ii!li m:;:;:;N~==;;~;;~::1~ ~.." ~it!2z it:l:- ZZZ~~2u!~t~ ... ~ii~~it ~b~rt ~ 0" U ~ ~~~ %~ ~ D ~ S x~wio"" a 8 - mm0<~~~~ffiz~~~m.gm0~m u~~mmm~me~~m~ ~ ~~~iS~O~N~<~~~i~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~g~~ ~ ii~~5i~~~gi~~i~~~ii~z~ffiiii~i~i~ii~~~ D 1!i 51 z on ~ .. .. 3 !:~ ~. z :> .. ~g :> .. c ".. ~ ~ U:I: z~ ;::1 ~ z< w lIi " it z "';: .. z ~ ~;: ~ :> E lIi 1= ~ ~II: " 0 ., 0 l:i g~ .. U Z .. : .. ... a ~ ~ ~ ... 0 w w i '" & ~ ... ~ z ! ili 0 ffi z ~ a 0 " Ii; a U i it w ;;; ~ l'l '" "' '" 5 9 .. R a 0 ... z U on ~~ 0 w U 1'8 U ~ :I: " ~ "z ~ ~ .. Zo ... 9 :<;:: '" z ~u z w u g~ ... li;~ a in 9 .. ~~ IE " w "0 0 ~ ~ ~ %z II: :I: a 0 "'0 ~ 0:> ... ~~ " ~c ~ ., ~ ifi ~~ if5 .. ... U ... .. a "'c: ~ ~ n ~ N N ~~; 9 ~ " Ii: Z ~ - oc~ N ~~. oOcoo x<z3 ~ ~ o~t< : ~ 8~<<g~ ~~i~~~ ~~~a Z~~ ~~z~~ ~ <~~-omZ> c~~<~~ ~x~oo ~w3 ~a~~o ~ ~~~~~~~~~ m~~~S~92~ffi~~i ~~~ ~~mS6 !!~IS~!!~II~~~ijjl~~~:!ill~jil;jJ!I~ ~~;~~~~~~~;~~~~~~=g~~g~~=~~~~~~~g~~~ rI~~~~~~'U~N_....n_NNN~CTN<ft~~~N<N~N~~N~ .. w ffi., ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w zi~;< ~ <~m < u 00~0~m~~m~ $~ ~ z ~ ~ z ~ E-~w~ ~ -~~ ~ S ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~o ~ ~~zw~ ~ ~ ~~u~~ ~ ~ Eoo 5 w ~ ~ ~ii~i~iiiiii ~~ ~!; ~I~~!~ ffi~ ~~ ~6~~~ffi~ ~ ~ ~ i:~ 1 ~ e~~ ~ ~o>~~>>>>>>>~. ~'ZZ w~~ ~~~=~ . ~ Z~~~ > < wffi ~ u ~c~ ~~zm06~~c~~oaa'~~< ~~ZS m~w.~x~~~~ u:~ ~1u1~~~~ ~~~ ~~1~~ m. ~W~3 Bffi1~3333333333~~~i :D9~~D e~~~~1~~g11 Q~ ~~ ~~1g~~~~ !~~ Ig~~~Q~~g~'6!~~ ~~~~~~~~!~~~~!~$$~~s~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~t~~o~~5~~~~~5~ffio~~~~~~1~~~~~~~~~ffi~;~~ ~ib~~tt:~~~a::a:::a::a:.a:ffi<~:tt-gJoOo ..., WOC)ZILG~a..:iUJwzzi2;:!;:.:a:wa,~ _ ..-!:~~WLilZO~~~~:z:~e:a: .o~z::i~ ~UI -w~~g~~i~ii~ii~~~~...~...~~~ii~c:.~~~~iJa.~~0-~~zz~~~~~~ffiffi~5~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~o.~~~~i~~~~~o~~~!~i m<illZ~~~w~~~~~0~ W>m ~xx<c ~~ ~a~~3~~Wmm~tz~g~~zu-u~x c~~~-~J~~:~~~ZW2~ ~~~~5~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~~w~S~~6066~~a8~ffimmoo~~~~~g~~55~~~~~gggo~~6a~~ ~m<<ammm~mm~~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmouuoouuuuuouuuuuuoaaDccww~~~~~~OC~~4Z:z:X.:~,.,.,~~~ ~~~'~NN. "".~~N~De"~"~~. :~~~:~:~;ftL~~~~=~=~~~~~~~~ ~..fti"~.~XXNN---~~WN.N~".- ~~~~:~g~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i U._~O"_.~~___..Dft".__~"S_ ~f:i:~~~~ ~~~:::!:::!2~ii~~Efitit~f 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . , . :~~~! :~saaa~5g:~~~;E~E=e:~5=;~Ea ~~.__ "...ft~.~mmN.mft_NN~.ft__.~NNh :tDR ..~ nNa ~:!fJ=::::~~~~:! O"""'Dmo""~. w_....tD"_..."~_C"Ie ~!~ggii~i~! -_N""...O.,.... ~s~~= ~~~~=~:~~s~~~::~~~~~~~~~s~~ i~~!! iss!s~~i~i~~~i:ii~g=i~a~~~~ :::i :;X:I ~;!= H!h~lti2!i8i:i i~~~~ ~i~zziS~ ~~~i~=~~i==:::!;!i~~~ i w ~ ~ !'l i ~ ....% 3 ~ I:; '" h a Ie m lig ~~ g ~J ~~ ~ ~ w ~~z~z D~~ ,~~ oaM%ZZ~ I~ W~a ~~ ~ ooz~ 0 ~ ffi8 ~<g~g m ~a~ :.~~~~~3ffiffi~gg~~~ ~mm~w3ffi~~~~~..ffiffioomS.. mm~ffi~~mmffi~~ffi~"'mffiffi.. oi~~:~~~g~o~~~~~~~~~ E~~~~o~3~~~~~~~!~~~~ ~~~t~~~~~S~~Sg~~~~ ffi~~~:~!z~~ffi~~~ggt~zo~~!~~~ffi!~guz5!~~~~~~~3~~~~~~!~!6~u6~!~ii I I i i '" w ~ 05 ~ II '" w ~ g~ w :z: g~ g 8 g15 '" ~ 3 ~ 8 I i I~ i :~ 5.. !i! g~ 0 Iii ~~ '" w 0 ~ '" I~ 0 ~ ~ l .. !!~ ! ~ ~ '" ! ~ N c ~ .. ~ 6 ~ ~ "' U i .. ~ ~ e ::> o ~x Mia.. "'~ ;:g ;j~ ~ c~~!l zg ~z ~~l'J ifi wmt1~g:s ~~ o~~ .-~:E~~c::lo')..lO~a: ~!~~~~g~H~ih~ .. '" ~ g :z: .. ~ '" c z o o ir .. ::! z .. iil I ::> c .. .. 0 c z "' U ~ Z ~ U ::> m '" a .. ~ '" .. 0 u '" 0 5 ~! z '" 0 ~'" 0 0'" 5: "''' .. .... N hft ~. :z: u ~ .. ~ a ! :: .. il z .. ~ .. ~ .. .. 0 N a & a l. a .. I 5! " ! '" .. ," .. ~ i .. I; l!! z '" 6 Ii! 5 .. ~ ::> ~ ~ ffi z Iii 51 0 z " 0 .... '" X " c w U u :i: z 0 w ,. .. 0 z .. D .. U a .. .. .. < .. .. .. '" .. % Ii: o :z o " .. .. .. I;; .... ::> ~~ ~ 8~ ~ 00 c ~ ~ ~:'i "'~ '" ~~ zz ~ :;;$ il:o 60 NN ~~ ,.,. ~ aD aU ~~ .... ~ a$ :3- ~~ ~>C -,. ~g ~o "'''' .. c~ <0 ,,~ "'''' e S5 n Sa .. ~'! ..~ N'" ::> i u I ~ ~... ~ 6 o~~. . ~ D ~~ ~ a < ~ ~v W _G ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a:~ ~ ~ Q ~ , % 0 ~~ E~~ 0> ~zz ~ ~m ~ ~~ 0 ~ 3~ ~~ 0 ~ ~ w~ B~g 2 ~~~ o~~t '-~6 I~ ~ ! ~~~ w6 68 ~g ~~ffiffi~ ~a: 6 ~6~~~ ~~ ~b ~ ~ ~oc~~~n~<~ ~~z~~~~~o~ ~~~m ~ moo ~w wd ~~ z~~~~~ w ~wz~ ~W<~M ZC: ~ u iiii!li~!~II~ii!il~iililii!j!iili~~;li;ililli;liloloiiii;iililiil!!;~i;i!i~!i ~O~%~<w~w$WWu~~w~w_m_w~~~zgm~<_~~~$~o~WX%_~-~-~~ ~=!.ou~ ~z~xz~~~~u> ~XOW- IDol~~~aw>-ZZo~MXD~~~~~Dc ~<n~~~a--~m~Dga~-~~:~_G~S~~ ~~g~~g~S~~~wgDgU:Z~mmg .a~~o~:~~~~$~~~~~~f~~~~~~~~~=!~~~~~;~a~a~~~a~i~a~~S52~~~~~~i~a~~~~i~~~~~2~~ i i X I/) :e! ~ ~~<~~ z a:aJ~ ~ < ~ z w ~ ...I ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ * ~>~~!~z ii~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ sf ~ ~ %s~~ ~~E ~~~~~ ~~ 05m~ff, ~~~~~~~ ~o~ >0 3 I~ 0 ~ ~~ffi u1 B ~'sm~~i ~~D ~~~S~~1~ 1geiii~i~ ~f~~~!~~~~1 i! ~! Ai~i~ n~ <c~~:~ ~~ ~ ~~~!,el~~A~rr~ !!iil!!~.liilllil;~I~I~!!I~lliiil~~III~li!llllli!!iiilil~~i~i~iii!!llil;I;! ~~~~~~~i~~~~~~g~~S~~~9~~Q~~~~~~i~~~~~~i~~e~~~~i~22~~~~~ffi~~~~g~5~~~~S~~~~~u~ ~~3~~~~~~g~~~~~s~~~~~~~~gggg~~~~~~~~~~m~~~g~~~~ffi~ffiffiffiffiffi~~8~~fu~~~~~~~~~S666~~ ~~~2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_~~~~_~_zzzz2zz4zzooa~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~00m~G~~0WW~ , Packet Page -2178- . ~ f'o- ...- E CI) ...... ...- ...- o N - ~ ...- - (!) . . ;=;~g; _,.._NO. N.,e._ ONNI"t ___e aNNN ~~~~~~e~ PlNU)N...... ....NNN... ~~U~5 ~iiii z~~~i~~6~it~~ ~=~_o~~~a i!S5~ii~= i6:i ~i&!~ '" '" ffi 8 ~ 2 ~~iz ~>wo~ ~m~;~~DomcmmaZ~~~D~~mj ~~~o~~~~wwwwiSm~~Wwww g~~~~~~m~~~~m~~~~~~~~w "'~~~~~~~Z~~~$<c~w~_~!o i ~ Q o i o u i w g l) w '" ;: l:! '" ! ~ ~ i5 w '" OZ ",0 ~~ "'.. '" :J ffi .. n " n ~ ~ W ~l .. o u ~ z ~ ~ li!5 n O;E ~~ :r~ Ii c '" !2 15 .. ~ ffi '" u ~ w > ii! c i ~ .. " .. o i '" ffi ~ ll1 .. ~ i ~.. 1i ;! .... .. ~ ~ 3 t; i o :gi!' ..s; S., 0" !;~ .. !:l ~ c ... ~ .. ffi c '" < o ~ ffi '" u w '" ... E < .... ~ _ m ~ ~ " ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ....... ~ '" Q "'.... ~ c ~c 6 ~Q~~ cU ,-'" ~..~ ZW C<W~-~ WQ 0 ZC ~ o~.. ~ c ~x ~~ - ~~3~~~N.~zzm~z8 ~>z~Sa ~oBwumg~w~~~~<~c~o_<zZ mZ~~~~No~ww~l>mzw~W~wQ3 O~- ~-z<~~z ~-Ow ~o - ~~c~~!~o~ggg ~~;~~g~~ffi ~~!~~~m~~U~N z~~w~~~g~ ~~~~~~~~~~~!fg~~~~~~~~ ~ W Z ~ ~ S ~.... ~~ w~ ~ D~~ ~~ Z ~ zg a~ ~ &~1s~~ g 5~ ~~ Ou ~ -w~~~o ~ <$ ~ 3. ~ ~~C%~~~ l~~3 1l 1A<9 ~~~ffiZX~ ~mg~ zi~~ ~~~~<~~~~~~$ ~~l~~~~~g ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~a>~~~~~~ g3~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~2c~~~ ~~~~~~ffi0<~~~~~~0ffi~~ffi~~ ~o~~~g~~~ooz~ Z~~~m2~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~~~ I _ 6/14/2011 Item 17.A.[ 11II GradyMinor I pivil Engineers · Land Surveyors · Planners · Landscape Architects I I i i I September 14, 2010 I REt Neighborhood Information Meeting ! Petition PUDZ-2007-AR-12292, Cope Reserve RPUD De~r Property Owner: ! . I PIJase be advised that a formal application has been submitted to Collier County, seeking I approval of a rezone from the Estates (E) Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit D~velopment Zoning District, by Highland Properties of Lee and Collier, Ltd., represented by D. W~yne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Cdleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., for the following described property: I I I i I I I I Approximately 14.3:!: acres located in the southeast quadrant of Cope Lane and County Barn Road, Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. i I . I 1 , I i ~e petitioner is asking the County to approve this application to allow development of 43 dwelling units comprised of single-family detached, single-family attached, zero lot line, multi- fatnily or townhouse unit types on the described property. I . ! In! compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our development intentions and to give you an opportunity to influence the form of development. The N$ighborhood Information Meeting will be held on September 3D, 2010, 5:30 pm at Berean B~ptist Church, 1859 County Barn Road, Naples, FL 34112. i I Ai this meeting the petitioner will make every effort to illustrate how the property will be developed and to answer any questions. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, I p~ease contact me. I ! I /"-srncere~y, I : I I !/ I < Sparon Umpenhour planning Technician I i I i ! i I I Q. Grady Minor ~AssOciates. PA. 3800 Via Del Re~ BonIta Springs. FL 34134 ! . Ph. 239-947-1144 · Fx: 239-947-0375 EB 0005151 · LB 0005151 · LC 26000266 www.gradyminor.com . ~ r-- "t'"" E Q) ..... "t'"" "t'"" o N - ~ "t'"" - CD . . ~ cf ::l.. c.~ ~ c~ ::la 0.5 ~ w ~ w I CL <( ~ ~ ~ C~ ::l.. a..~ 1I.:s (.)L !'; ~ ~ w w C) Z Z o N a !il .. : ~g ; '" .. Q.il N " en .. N ~i N '" " ~D :3 D ~~ rr - ~ a g:t l';' ~ <C M i Ii. . w ~ ~~ t-- I '" 0 ~ .. ..~ ,. 0 iii N. U. . :: N I a: Cl I ~ ::l / a.. , """"111_ I - 'llo Z 0 i~i 0 I- j:: 1;- N w 0.. I; I CL ii <( << ~ c ~ D ii N Z 0 - I- <( 5" ~ () ~I .; a 0 ~ &:11 D i -J < D 5 '" " 51 ill ~ ;; i l!l ~ ! :: 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. Cope Reserve RPUD Petition AR-12292 . Neighborhood Information Meeting September 30, 2010, 5:30 p.m. , , I I I D. Wayne Arnold, agent for the applicant opened the meeting at 5:35 p.m. In attendance waS Kay Deselem representing Collier County. At the time the meeting began, four res~dents were in attendance. A sign-in sheet was provided at the entrance of the meeting room and three of the four attendees si~ed in. Aerial photographs of the site an~ surrounding area, and a copy of the conceptual site plan were displayed. i I Mr.1 Arnold gave a brief explanation of the rezone application, project location, and des~ription of the proposed uses. Mr. Arnold requested that anyone in attendance wishing to obtain updated information about the project could provide their email address I andi his office would provide notice of the public hearing schedule. I DuJ to the size of the meeting questions were allowed to be asked during the pre$entation. Questions raised were in regards to water management, landscape buffering, size of berm, improvements to Cope Lane, building types and heights, project denbity and compatibility with the surrounding area, hearing dates, zoning process and I dev~lopment time frames. Mr. Arnold addressed the water management preliminary deslgn and requirements of the State and County, the landscape buffer types.and widths adj~cent to the residences on the northern boundary, Cope Lane improvements and the proposed building heights. Ms. Deselem addressed the hearing process, Cope Lane imBrovements and project density. . I Mr.1 Arnold invited anyone with further questions to call his office or to contact Ms. De,elem. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:20 p.m. I I I I . . Packet Page -2182- PUBLIC NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING HELD AT BEREAN BAPTIST CHURCH, 1859 COUNTY BARN ROAD, 5:30 P.M., SEPTEMBER 30,2010, BY D. WAYNE ARNOLD OF Q. ~RADY MINOR AND ASSOCIATIESJ P.A. AND RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH, ESQ. OF -COLEMAN, YOV ANOVICH AND KOESTER, P .A., REPRESENTING HIGHLAND PROPERTIES OF LEE AND. COLLIER, LTD. j 1 t 1 I l I PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER, AND EMAIL ADDRESS AS A RECORD OF YOUR ATTENDANCE. THANK YOU. ~ ~ o C\l ~~ ~ - <0 {' '( L- . Cope Reserve RPUD -AR-12292 EMAIL (20 jJ /tfLGs ft1J7iJ />r (C)J1 ~ It.OL . 11.,-( l Vrt~ 7P-2?Jr- 9.30.2010 NIM r-- i i , . :=--~.:_---.l..:-.~~~""";'T . I . tr;. ~. ~ -g ~.g H~ mC~ ~ m~ "'OM,-- ~. ~ ~~. ....:5:E '" III 0 .-. :;:s ~'. .z 'lft",~,~:>::J: C') g=:: .U \J 0) i ci 0 ~. .;.J.O) ~. . ~ ):. . Z C\I I >, -e E . .':;;. ~ ex) ,: . ~ 0;; _ ~ : JJ ~ 'a> ..9!, C . P~Q'~" -oo{/) ".Q. --g . 'p.,j' .::: I"" :'Qj c: ~. ca -0.-, " .~O W 'a:I' -;..; ~ ta~ ,.~g" . . .... '-c ,'''0: OCt)' .'. W,'~':S al c:( E ca 0'_' . .-.: O.~ ~ : lR c:( ~ rid!. -;..g. . E3 ::~.-=:; ..~ .,.E ~ ffi ~ E -::~.~ H . Ii~ ,-0 C/,l ~ I."" ca .... . . E-!l . ~ . 0 g .lB as ,Z a:t. ~ E , 0 . ... Z. ~O: 'of:'~~..' ~ ~ . 2 ~ Z 0'0 ".J 0 0...... .... I: .~ . . :< ..~;C C/,l ..... C -o::S ~ '- . U '~M . . I '.t= ~ ~ 0 ,N' 0 e f:' :i5 '.~:w - N .!2'<t; ,; 0'0 . g::s 5 . E} I- I ~ -0 13 :i' .(").cn. TOO . . :.. <c~ Q .i.- !a ._> ...-1:)' . C'20.0, . .,... . . ", . I:' m co ~ ' '. p,( ". . ..... '-0 ,,;. .,0 'm' .c.... ,... "0. S'. ':'.', ..Ift a: .... i C g ~:: E.r;.K,' I: == . . '..:. .;.\,,1., :".... .'m.- .>. O. m .0 . .....!.. C1I o. " ". -. . .~. 1a.~ ~ (,)..' -..... +. m.o, , W'N' " .: >- "0 c,,g. m.I:._~ . ......,' C. 'i.3'O c: I: ,..m CJ ; .t= S...... . ': I::;l Z 0 ,,.....~ III III ..lJ) t-'-,~: . % , r" . 0 . t '"' rn E ~.' -... . (1) w : 'oJ . ._ ., a>""'.m . .1Il . ". 'ct. . ~ ~ '. '.. ....:-.:5'...m.Gl_....'S, '~O'CO .: o '. .:..... '.-.' j c :.0,.0..... ..i - ca'- . " m .(.):C\l " . ., . .. ., ';;;,':crt:? 'l:) . '; In''' ro._ a> . Z ... Cl): '1'- . _....' '. 0 0 g' U _ ........... "r',g'~r~'~~..,' . i'.., a: ~ ~: . I-C . W. J.c - O"t:" e.,..... ca "'- .H '..., ::3<e(,C/,l Gl' . G)' ,0,... - IXl " i 0. - W a. . a:t . J!!,;"O :5 . ' . p . i'1~ ~.c e ... '., : ~!J g ..~ .- : r.- c .Q'B. . (/) '(j'{/)- .- .... I . . " .....J, .;: Lt.L.. 0 ~ . . ~,... ",:,1- :- -'- -- .... - - - -.:' ~-- ~_. .' .- " . E:C: d ~~.. e .m :J 'E :::l ,.,,!-" Ec.lllCD "~ g-a:... ~ _ m . m'mCDc,O. . g- ffi ~ .5~ ; '0.:0 .51m 3:. .... m- 0 .m 'c:'.a:. ~ ..... .t= . ""'. .. -0 0'" .- -- In' Gl . ~ -0' Q;..~ ~ . o. a> O..5,'E lit.~ D:E IV' .... III C/,l 0.... oc::lllOE ...... CC/,l::S :;:.,;ti'i 3::=: E' 'E ::::'0. 5;. _ :l -'c ... m o .g ~. OJ.5 .0 '-.m 1::- ....:,,~ .0=0 .~c: o.~- = ...... == e 8-~' (J'-q' ar '" ~ m.t'). N OlO o"<l:'-o- 1::... ~ ~ CD . iI. : '2"'0 0. 0 .t= .Q ~;;: IV"ti'i. ~ ~ 1i) .....o'~. m: i5 .E.-.'lll .0.., ..... IV .>. .' .sa ~,g in'E . ffic:'~ ~'-as . c.o is ,8, ... .=::.N . o'..!!! a 'W' !2l ,.,' Cl >,_-= 0..E; 1:::"C/,l Co '0 C/,l alal - . 'a.a; NI ,~ -g E ..... -. e- ~ 0. If! .0 .0. O. iii . a> ~ Gl .s .Gl .t= m.o...:s::: CD .0. ...,. :S. e;'1-:- :0 ~. .~ .'.tl'l1IJ~ . . c . . '. . . J . . I" L .~ . ; . . c. . . c .. c. . ;; c . 11.... YtN8m: 'mM IItClM .LaWIII Packet Page -2184- ~_. . '. .',._...._......._.J~..... 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. .-0. li;....~.m '. '.'.' 15= III .0 ", . " .:t::. 0 c E ~ .', ~().QCD'.. '-- .0.'-0 1ii C. . .. . ~Ca>m m. III :l (/) ~.. , EJi5 0" >, , . 0 . 8:. 0. ~ ~. ". ~ . ._0_._ m CD' a; '''..IV C/'). =:: >...t; E ...... CD':J I , 'C e -0.0 m 'm' ea 1::: ~ E uimci)D-o.' . ....CC)( OCD ~ .S! 3::;::.IV - ~ :J .- 0' CD ..... a> Do .!!!. a> m. cD 0.'. > Q z_ .>:s ~ C . '.0. li;.~ CD -0 mO.. -,c. 0 a:: .C:5:2.t= <t, I:: "C 13 ~. IV.s;: _ 0. - ~. C CD o C/,l;> -0"": E o....~ rtJ > :E '0 C ti'i. ..!!! -..... 5 w. .~ .JJ)e~ ~ E. ~.!l 2 :r; :J' . 'en . . CIS 1l c3 13 c..c ..I e' 0. 0 . c. m 1::: .~. a>- -0. :>.:;::' EO ;::.0 uj.t= CD.l!l ..,9 0. t::.Z .... ...... :0. 0 ~ . III 0 g! ~ m llle 0;'0 ;;;.. ,O>:l C .- m co 5~:;l"O Oc:.l >"_ CD m ~. 1::: -0. lii .0 C m-O C :l a.,c.:lca 0, o lll.o o. 0 """ c .?- >, ..... . a. 0 ~ m a>' -0.. ~.:s. == c lll::::.. 0 lll'EIVuj.S! 0 . C/,l-a> ~.- J . C/,l C/,l co mm~ CDuO' :'. ,5 a..c .E C\l . . C/,l m :l E. _ .:l..c'o 00' lIl'_.O 0c? . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. NAME OF APPLICANT (S) HIGHLAND PROPERTIES OF lEE AND COLLIER. lTD. ADDRESS 2223 TRADE CENTER WAY CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34109 TELEPHONE # _______________ CELL # ______________ FAX # __________ E-MAIL ADDRESS: ___________________________________________ ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): No site address ~l~t~tf~~lk~~~~~m~;!~~i~~'~~;~.: ;;1l~~":~;~,(~gG;Att:~DE~;G~'iRw:[O:N~) ""~~;;~::~:~j;~~j$~~~~t)}~:;~~E~;:: Section/Township/Range 08 ISO /26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book _ Page #: _______ Property 1.0. #: 00403200009 and 00403160000 Metes & Bounds Description: . "" ,.;~TJlliiQ~!s~Wi~1~E.j}Y($.:f'Q~~litqfi3.$:I~~QYml.tn~~~~{~~1!~~~~E:;~~J\?it~~~;m[;: (Check applicable system): COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM a. CITY UTI L1TY SYSTEM b. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM PROVIDE NAME _________ d. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT (GPD capacity) e. SEPTIC SYSTEM ~ D o o o ,'-:"'-r:~-_::;'_:;,,'" .,: __'" ~'.' .... - :;.:::r:;;.:':;,-:,;;:..-.~i?_:," ''''._E:::_L;;.''''''"';~'O~;; -~~~~,:-;.~~-:.:., ..~.--, ":''-;'; ~;__'."': -:'"~':-':;;_~'::i.,,,::...__<.: :~~\..,~'-: ,':~l,:.;, .'; ;i""- i",;- ".,; :~..' '!;"'~~-:;";~,TVPE-;~O' J:'~'W'^;.,.FER"S'E.RV'Im-I:;.;::rrO"'"B"J:'" 'PR'r::o"V.ID"E D:i;";r' ~~~f_::,,::~'~-l~~~~:, :";--_.};. ".:~~;;.~ ~.;,.f:\~~~:;_:" "...: '~'.~" '_".__:o...'~. l~~~~~-~f .;i :~,_-_ 'J;:~'. .<.. ;,?~-;:~-~~:__,":..~..,~'_' .-~~.\f.:; a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM [ZJ b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM 0 c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM 0 PROVIDE NAME ___________________ d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WEll) 0 . Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 1/22/07 PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 REV: 1 COPE RESERVED 0 Project: 2005090021 Date: 9/18/070 DUE: 10/16/07 Packet Page -2185- ~ I"- ~ E Q) ....... ~ ~ o N - V ~ - (0 i I STATEMEN1 OF UTILITY PROVISIONS - page 2 , _ ,.:"-~,.l "'-<"" " . '.~ _.-.~...- /,--...."'....'_ -,' ....... .~. '.-'T~-," . ...,.,t:":".---~__ tot AL:.POjpUtt\ll PN>:tdiBlLOSEaMEQ: 43 Units -. .~. i .-."'" .~. ...~. ..---- '--.--. . ----. . .---- .~ . ! , i P~K:'ANtFAVERAG'gfDAJLY:'.DEMANDS~ .',C"" __,.-.,~. _.-...:.'"'-___...;..,:..~...:;_......."'o......:..__~~..:._p__-,......_.. _....;.,:... .__ 0'.. .--~-.;.-.. ..-............ A. i WATER-PEAK 19.404 GPD AVERAGE DAILY 12.936 GPD B. i SEWER-PEAK 13.104 GPD AVERAGE DAILY 10.080 GPD IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYStrEM, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED , I i ! I I 'N'AR@TJVE!'STATEfvrENT~ Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and ....."-.~~~-,li-1.-....:...;..;.-....~........ _:;.__.!".....o-''"'''~~,_......._..c.,.:~.:...= schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a spe~jfjc statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. N / A - connect to central sewer. ~~1-~.'-:'';--''Y'._~'--'''-~:~'----''''-~~'''~~''''':'"--=''''':~: - __T,-:-_~~,-,-~,,":,:-":-r.'~~~':-'=:-,r-.~,~-:-..:~ .~~ "":"~""'~:'7'::"O--' ..-:::, ;C:Qf(;lEB.;j;f:QUJ~LYS~JiJL;lI?{tl)'EOICA[lIQ~~5.I~TEM~liIjTllf the project is located witljtin the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized stateme-nt shall be proVided agreeing to dedicate to Collier . C04nty Utilities the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within . the I project area upon completion of the constructio!1' of these facilities in accprdance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time. Thi~ statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system deV:elopment charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the: statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. i I 5TAI1~.MENJ&~;:Qf{~A~jjrt1t)(~([KpAe~-;ffioM~r9l[EfERtf~j~:~IVI5IB$T2,;U n less waiVed or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the I project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other tha~ the County, a statement from that provider indicating that there is ad~quate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. I I I I I i i , I I I Application For Public Hearing For PUD Rezone 1/22/07 ! . COWER C"UNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HOF 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA .)'t I U'f WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET (239) 403-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968 . (i) .., "0'... PtnD~2007-AJl-12292 REV: 1 COPE RESERVE Project: 2005090021 ~ Date: 9/18/07 DUE: ]0/16/07 REZONE - STANDARD PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES Date: ~/ I'! /0'7 Time: 10: tf.r Firm: ~ h'4 ~~ It & ~ Project Name: ~ Applicant Name: ' ~ Phone: 7Cf7-/I'A? &,h. i9l . J /~JLJV(I~-- Owner Name: Owner Address: Phone: Assigned Planner: ,Tt> M.-v ~ S Meeting Attendees: (attach Sign In Sheet) Meeting Notes . AP[~. jI~ - jJ()N'~ ~. Z~ · (j)~tJE ~ ///(~ : 's:,6 cc7Jr-EIls ../j H.'rDt)4~~~"' ~ .M/~'~"f..- ~b"'M ~P;"'''f J~l-- 6f M.".,)UA"?....-(....- qtJ ~~-'f"~ -r; C2-'~ o#- tf"0,40wRY ~ -~ L~ Jk ' - /. . . ...J..- . " . ........, - _ ':.c-r"'>Y.L.L-zz:;d.'t. - C~~. ~.... ~ r&"""'n- Cc~...aa~' ht...#' , . fO.v AlGi/v. : 7:"~.c.4> K /. v' / /.. -,y -~ ' - d' ..;_ j - - " .-J- _ ,,' ". -''''''?'. _ ~ . _ /" -' ,~ 0 ~~~~~. d!L>./~~I..,c<-:~.G..,,, ,C l!=~-' c;L...thA tic.4t~:.{..., # ... \.(-:'..L'o---.;;t:~, ~.,.-.:. Y:' u.-.$./o-71... 4 &If ~%' -. . t 4 t. f;;cc{ U.I. '. ....!-.. m.5jP'./"';'~~.P?! c.b/ ~PJ2fSEltI/l/S " ft'!;t?tJ ,/-0 [if &,A{IH"itJd LI/ 1M C,tIf!C'.t!A 1/1/' 6/11ll- tIJC. Lr?,CID. 03 .05: l0EAbH&12..HCYOD {tSFo~ o~ MEEn Nb- \'\II ~~ red. ::M-hc.1~~uUfjs~ · - f,4{. J.l1;;'1irIi~ i2 (;Ii'V~ J/J. ~ e.~cc,(,.-e.)-\- ~~ '"'"" "!> f>v..../o..Lr(. ,.> C. ~ ~ ;&tM- '-<.. ~-+L (~p~ ~...,-eJvJ$'f.:r 1A(t),<<II<^'6 - avP,? -S4~ r;$ dV~~~/TY; ~ I..C,AJ"IiR-..., L.1"~ ~J }-je-'Tfl~J.,"7 H66:Tt""'b ~~ 'Z-;.?, ~~ ~V~T ~ o/w ~J>1 ~ ltJ. :'?1L ~ r;J-4LJ:. ,:;.-..J ~.7. " 1s-'vJ ~ tcn~\lC-T ~041..~ D('J ~ PLANNER MARK IF NEEDED TO BE ROUTED TO REVIEWERS BELOW: 'f,I.l-! f='o~ oo'41...e- ~..., 6<Ue Comments should be forwarded to the Planner prior to the due date ;S1'Ye- oF- I.<)T6tUJ4L- >~) . SCHOOL DISTRICT PARKS & REC - Amanda Townsend SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS IMMOKALEE WATER/SEWER DISTRICT DRlEM1 - EMER. MGMT - Jim UTILITIES ENGINEERING - Zamira Deltoro .- Von Rintein BA YSHORE/GA TEWA Y CDES Coordinator - Linda B. Route Sheet only TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT Executive Director Packet Page -2187- REZONE - STANDARD (RZ) APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST . I THIS COMP(ETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW W/CPVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION. , I NOTE: INC~MPLETE SUMBITT ALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. REQUIREMENTS #OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED <t; f'- ~ E Q) ~ Additional s~t if located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopm:ent Area Completed A~plication (download from website for current form) Pre-Applicati~n meeting notes ., Deeds/legal'~ List identif ing Owner & all parties of corporation Owner AgentiAffidavit signed & notarized Completed Aqdressing Checklist Environmental !Impact Statement (EIS) and digitalj electronic copy 0 EIS or exemption justification . '!(Jr.4/.. c(), Y 4-1- fl/}fl.-- of ~: ~ ':4'/ Historical Surv:ey or al er reques Utility Provisiqns Statement w /sketches Surve , signee;! & sealed Traffic ImpactlStatement (TIS) or waiver Aerial photog~aphs (taken within the previous 12 months min. scaled 1"=200'), sho~ing FlUCCS Codes, legend, and project boundar Electronic cop~ of 011 documents and plans (CDRom or Diskette) i I If located in RFMU (Rural Frinae Mixed Use) Receivina Land Areas Applicant m~st contact Mr. Gerry J. Lacavera, State of Florida Division of Forestry @ 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mit~gation & Prevention Plan", LDG Section 2.03.08.A.2.a.(b)i.c. . ~ ~ o N - ~ ~ - c.o f Application Fee: $6,000 + $25 per acre Fe" $190.00 Fire Code Review $750.00 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review $5?0.OO Pre-application fee (Applications submH-ted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre- ~ ap~lication meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre-application meeting will be required). $2500.00 Environmental Impact Statement review fee "Kl $7~9.00 legal Advertising costs for CCPC meeting (to be reconciled upon receipt of invoice from Naples ~n4 Da1Iy News). ~ $3~3.00 legal Advertising costs for BCC meeting Transportation Fees, if required: a $500.00 Methodology Review Fee, if required/. c ll'l.A-r~" g $750.00 Minor Study Review Fee, if required ,:;vJTI.- / o $1(500.00 Maior Study Review Fee, if required i Fee Total ~ I I i I i I Applicant/Agent Signature Date I I I . I~fi \ ~ ).. ~ \ " /;) \ · 6/14/2011 Item 17 A . , lee. ~I I\. ~ IV o~.s;:- cpco() it n CJ LA,.-rWfI " .. .' ~ ~ 1> vb tic.. tJ-t'i I \ t-1 ~tl ~ tS( 10 U ( cd fZ- ~ sk -k n~ o\- ~ ~ $-\-J ?~\JI$iOfLS' W~~ +k a?fl,~\-=- Oc!... ~ 011. I ~ \ t \ ,~(') vhf\' r YV7 +l~ 1~1- u~ o1-M~ V\J ~U S I ~ e OtS of' n~ nf- ~ C:,()\ X id ." ~RE.SS\~~~ 5~~~ \\\~S \0 ~F\\J- CD$ R \' 3D 1=1='\ (<.. c. h . aJ.5'cfi/E: fJ.~;vt( COu,v1'7 I~ 15 ff/l;'.o ~4bJrVt1 Co/E. /0 r /y;:?r fl '- /5'~ ~6/!/?- ~o uTt/ oJt:~ Ie) :/ ~ / b---r-iJ of ,e;/v'&rA_c,U) Ph/!/ 77(~-:A..J /0 17Y~~ / /CJ e~/ f?elZl/1~~, )0 17Y/E~ 'r-oK "t?-..c5r.?YF r"l-5T~ ,kJt.lrli7--r6-7C. _/~Vb mY ~F~ ~5 /fVrr~~ .1/iI~ ./,/P/J;f?RI%7e / . . Packet Page -2189- ~ l'- ~ E Cl) ....... ~ ~ o N ~ ~ = ~ ~ CO QJ Qj- . ~ d 0' .piiiif ~ ~ u . "'" ......-t Q;c ~ < f ~ ;..c ~ I ~. ~, ~-'----"- ~ ~ 7J1 Z ~ Z ". )10-0(: 00 i ~ \:-~ o w w ~:E ::J-u.. ~ -... 0 ~w ~ Q 3: Q) oS; Q) ~ - c Q) E Q. - o Q) -a; c:; > > Q) 0 C m .. "'tS ._! c - w :E <( z b w .., o ~ 0. l::J 0 .... u ~ @) m II) C II) .- 0 C E ~ "'tS .... .S; o c _ "'tS C C Q) ..c E 0 - .. .. o II) Q. II) Q) Q) o -a .. ." ~ <C o - ~ .6 "'tS :: . .S; w o o I C ..c l'-.. o M ..., N .. 'l:;t' = I W 'l:;t' Z 0 Z ~ <C ,.. .... Q) c.. ..a o E w ;:) Z Z o Q) _ C en 0 en ..c <C Q.. ~:i~:~~-'~;:-;:-:-: ,-':'-.:: -'.:0.' ; -.-,..~." . :.:....---;::'.:.,.'.~. ----..--, Ji~ ~ ~1~~1 C ~~r~5~ ~t~~~~ '~" :;".:~~'d ~ V) V) w = C C <C .... <( :: I w , I ~~ I..;j. '- ~ W J:Q ~ ::) Z w Z o :J: Q.. tv , -' .---., 3 ..J """"" .::r """ .......... "--.J ~ '-., ,.,- \:. \ ~N- 1-" \ , q '-- -.....> a- ~ '*'- ~ -... z 0:: V;~ ~iZ: o a- o >- I- Z ::) o u \~ ';.J "''" ~ II. V) I,G ~~ \.!..J . Ii'.:) ~G\- ~ll (' ~ Q \. , w :: <C Z . ~ ~ ~ 'j. .~ ~ ~ e~ ('I) N ~ \~ ~~ C3 ~ l~ .... () o "C i~ ~ ~ Z~ ~,~ iii~ Ul o :2 ::::; ! ~1t' C) ~. ., . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. Omega Consulfing Group PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 REV: 4 COPE RESERVE Project: 2005090021 Date: 7/9/10 DUE: 8/6/10 SUPPLEMENT TO THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT COPE LANE PRESERVE Rezoning JUNE 2010 Cope Lane Collier County, Florida Prepared For: Highland Properties of Lee and Collier, Ltd. Prepared By: Reed K. Jarvi, PE Omega Consulting Group, LLC 3365 Woods Edge Circle, Unit 101 Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Job # RB009.01 Packet Page -2191- ~ r--- "t""" E Q) ...... "t""" "t""" o N - -..t "t""" - CD I I I I I i I i i I I I I I The andlysis indicated that the estimated Cope Reserve RPUD site-generated trips are projected i to be less than the 2% of the SFmax of County Barn Road. i j Cope L~e is not'in'cluded in either the Concurrency Segment Table or in the AUIR. table for 2009, therefore, was not included in this analysis. I , . BAC~GROUND AND TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES Specific Link volume data were provided by the Collier County Transportation Department. Data reyiewed included Collier County AUIR. for 2003-2009. The Appendix contains copies of the apphcable data used. Per Collier County TIS guidelines, a 2% growth rate was used in backgro~d traffic projection analysis for County Barn Road due to the calculated growth rate ! being nFgative. Horizon year 2015 background traffic volumes on County Barn Road were developbd through use of the 2009 AUIR. background plus Trip Bank traffic along with ! projecti&g the AUIR 2009 peak hour volumes forward using the growth rate. Revised Tables 4 I and 5 present the link-specific background traffic data with the information contained in the I Collier County AUIR table for 2009 and that from the AUIR.'s from 2003-2009. I . , I Revise~ Table 4 I __ '__ _._______ . __' __.__.._. 1Backgrciund Traffic Volumes . . ... ."1 - ..... .-.. ...-..._....:....0 --..!..-. ., Based oni 2009 Collier County AUIR " ,_ _. ~ l'- ". - -... . -___._'_" W""' ..- : ; ~; Pk Hr I Trip : Total i 'U~kr""'- 'F~~; '-r"T;~'rv~i~;;r &~k-TV~I~-;;~ '~i.~Ji~~~~~~i~~E5~ T~~-d69~'-: I I ! Revised Table 5 I I i .. _ _..__ ..._ _ __, ._._. ....__ __ _u. _.._ ..-_ Backgro~nd Traffic Volumes; ~ ~ : ..___....,_ .,.. _....u.....,.____..__....u __ ....... Based on ~istorical AUIR growth 2003-2009 , 'j _.~._-- -.. .-._- .... -. , . 2003 . 2004 2005 2006' 2007 . 2008 ... . - .-.. - .. .. . Pk Hr R Pk Hr Pk Hr Pk Hr . Pk Hr ,. . 2009 2003-2009 Growth: 2015 . Pk Hr' Growth Rate Pk Hr . Unk To Volumeyolume V~~ume~Yc:lume YolumeVol~m.e ~ol~m~. Rate Used Volume From i ~ - -- --j- .,- . '. - County Ba,mRattlesnake Davis' 670 '_. al _ .~... -... -.- " . ... . I i Cope Lane reserve .. 690 . 660 : 650 584 2.0% 660 : -2.3% 690 666 . Page 2 C\Docs\Projea:sU008\R8009\Tr.msportation\R8009 ZTIS _0' .docx 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . ApPENDIX . Collier County AUIR Excerpts from 2003-2009 . . Cope Lane Preserve Page 4 C\Docs\Projeas\200B\RB009\Transportation\RB009 ZTIS_O l.dooc Packet Page -2193- ~ I'- ~ E (l) ...... ~ ~ o N - ~ ~ - <.D Vanasse" . Daylor , ! i TAAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT CdPE RESERVE RPUD i , ! FEB~UARY 26,2008 I PUDZ-2007-AR-12292 REV: 2 COPE RESERVE Project: 2005090021 Date: 2/29/08 DUE: 3/28/08 I I I I County Barn Road Colliier County, Florida . ! Prepared For: Highlarld Properties of Lee and Collier, Ltd. 2223 ~rade Center Way Naplesl Florida 34109 ! i Prepared By: Vanasse & Daylor LLP Job # 81.133.01 ! i , i I I I I i I 12730 ~ew Brittany Boulevard, Suite 600, Fort Myers, Florida 33907 T 239.437.4601 F 239.437.4636 w vanday.com ! I I I I . . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. Table of Contents IN1:'R.O D U CTI ON AND SUlY.11\1AR Y... ..................................................... ................................. 1 SUlv.fMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................... 1 AREA RO.ADW A Y SYSTEM .............. .... ............. ..... ........................ .......... ................. ........ 2 C01v1JY.1I'rI'ED RO.ADW A Y JJv.[PROVE:rv.1ENTS .................................................................. 2 'TRIP GE~TERA TI ON.............. ............. ........ ............ ....................................... ............. .......... ...... 2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGN"MENT .............................................................................. 3 SIGNIFICAN"CE TEST AN"AL YSES ....... ............................... ................. .............. ............... 3 BACKGROUND AND TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................................... 4 CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE ..................................................................................... 5 LIN'K AN"AL YSES ............. ....... .... ................ ......... ........... .................... ................................. 5 List of Tables Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Site Generated Trip Generation estimate Traffic Distribution Significance Test Background Traffic Volume Projected Growth rate and Background traffic volumes Link LO~ Analysis Results List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Location Map and Study Area and Studied Intersections Traffic Distribution AM Traffic Assignments PM Traffic Assignments Appendix Cope Reserve RPUD TIS Table of Contents Page i Packet Page -2195- <X; r-- ~ E (I) ....... ~ ~ o N - ~ ~ - c.o IN~RODUCTION AND SUMMARY I I Vanas~e & Daylor LLP (VanasseDaylor) is providing this Traffic Impact Statement for the Cope I Reserv~ Residential PUD zoning approval. The purpose of this study is to provide Collier i Coun~ with sufficient information to assure that traffic-related impacts are anticipated and that I effective mitigation measures are identified for the proposed development. . The Cope Reserve RPUD is located on the southeast corner of Cope Lane & County Barn Road I interseFtion in Section 8, Township 50 South in Collier County (see Exhibit 1). The site area is approi,imately 14.3 :l: acres. The.proposed Cope Reserve RPUD may consist of up to 43 single family: dwelling units. The following Land Use pro gram is proposed for the total proj ect: : Residential Single-family (LU 2(0): 43 DU i The site will have one full-movement access on the Cope Lane. Only traffic generation, I distribhtion, AM and PM traffic assignments, significance test and roadway link LOS analyses I are pr~pared in this study. No intersections are studied or analyzed. i ! Forp$poses of this evaluation, the BuildoutYearwas assumed to be consistent with the Collier i Coun~ 2013 planning horizon. . SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The ~ysis indicated that the estimated Cope Reserve RPUD site-generated trips are projected i to be Iless than 2% on County Barn Road, and that the estimated trips will have no adverse I impa~t on the adjacent roadway link. All roadway segments are projected to operate within SFmax! i No roadway or intersection improvements were identified as being needed ill order to , acconpmodate the background traffic. i The ~eveloper proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permlts are issued for the proposed project. i I i I i ! i i Cope Rf'Serve RPUD TIS . Page I 1:\Projeas\8II\81133\Tnffic\81133RPUDTIS_Ol.doc . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . .r AREA ROADWAY SYSTEM The description of the existing environment of the site and the surrounding study area, as well as the committed improvements, provides a basis for the analysis of the build-out alternative that provides a determination of the proposed project impacts. The study area for this development was determined to be County Barn Road north and south of Cope Lane. County Barn Road County Barn Road in the study area is a north-south 2-lane collector road under county jurisdiction. County Barn Road stretches from Rattlesnake Hammock Road at south to Davis Boulevard at north. in Collier County. The roadway alignment is fairly level and tangent. The speed limit is posted at 45 mph. COMMITTED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Roadway improvements are constructed in order to help alleviate current area road deficiencies and to support future area development. For purposes of this study, knowing that a roadway improvement is "committed" means that the characteristics of the higher-level facility may be used in the reserve capacity estimates. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction, or are scheduled to be constructed within the FY 2004 to FY 2010 time frame were considered to be committed iIDprovements. These were identified in the Collier County Transportation Improvement Plan Year 2007/2008-2012/2013. The committed improvements in the study area include: · Santa Barbara Boulevard 6-lane extension from Davis Boulevard to Rattlesnake Hammock Road under design, Construction start was anticipated for late 2008 TRIP GENERATION The potential number of site-generated trips was estimated using rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation (ih Edition) and the previously presented land development program. The trip generation equations shown below were used for this report. Single-Family Detached Housing (lU 210): ADT: In(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.71 AM Peak Hour. T = 0.70 (X) + 9.43 PM Peak Hour: In(T) = 0.90 In(X) + 0.53 Cope Reserve RPUD TIS Page 2 J:\ProjeC13\8J 1\81133\Tr.lflk\81133RPUDTIS_Ol.doc Packet Page -2197- ~ l'- ~ E (1) ~ ~ ~ o N - -.;:t ~ - CO . The abpve equations were used with the land use data provided to generate the estimated trip genera10ns for the project as shown in Table 1. ; Tableil SITE GENERA TED TRIP ESTIMATE AM Peak PM Peak LAND USE Size Unit ADT Total Enter m T etal Enter Exit ; I I Single ~i1y (LU 210): 43 DU 478 40 10 30 50 32 18 Totals 478 40 10 30 50 32 18 TRIP! DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT The trfrlTIc generated by the development was assigned to the adjacent roadways using the informiation on the area. The proposed site-generated trip distribution is shown in Table 2. I Exhibit 2 presents the trip dis1n.lmtion on the roadway network. I i Table! 2 I TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ! . Roaaw...v selmlent From To Traffic Distribution. County ~am Road County earn Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road Cope Lane Cope Lane Davis Boulevard 50% 50% Exhib~ts 3 and 4 graphically present the AM and PM site-related traffic assignments. I SIG~IFICANCE TEST ANALYSES , I Acco~ding to Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) Section 6.02.02: i "M. Sigrificance Test Impact for the impact traffic analysis purposes for a proposed development project will be consid~red significant I. i On those roadway segments directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or greater than 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; 2.; For those roadway segments immediately adjacent to segments which are directly accessed by the project where project traffic is greater than or equal to 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; or 3. i For all other adjacent segments where the project traffic is greater than 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. ! Opc.e traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segments using the above standards, the development's impact is not required to be analyzed further on any additional segments." I I I I I Cope R~erve RPUD TIS Page 3 1:\Projeas\8IIIBI133\Traffic\8II33RPUDTlS_Ol.doc i I i . . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. In other words, a project will have a significant and adverse impact on a state or regionally significant roadway only if both of the following criteria are met: (1) the project will utilize 2 percent or more of the maximum peak hour service volume at the adopted level of service standard for the adjacent and next to adjacent link, 3 percent for the other links; and (2) the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted level of service standard. Significance was estimated according to Collier County's 2/2/3 rule using the adopted link- specific performance standard maximum service flow rate (SFmax) contained in the AUIR. in accordance with Collier County practice, and the links were evaluated to determine whether projected 'operation would be within County standards. The data resources used for this analysis are shown in the Appendix. Table 3 presents the significance test results. Table 3 SIGNIFICANCE TEST Road Se\:ments From To AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR AM Peak Project PM Peak Project Peak AUIR Project Tr.1flic as % Project Traffic as % Dir. LOS Std Traffic of LOS Std Traffic of LOS Std County Bam Road Rattlesnake Hammock Cope Lane NB 860 5 0.6% 16 1.9% Road SB 860 15 1.7% 9 1.0% Cope Lane Davis Boulevard NB 860 15 1.7% 9 1.0% SB 860 5 0.6% 16 1.9% County Bam Road The analysis indicated that the estimated Cope Reserve RPUD site-generated trips are projected to be less than the 2% of the SF = of County Barn Road. Cope Lane is not included in either the Concurrency Segment Table or in the AUIR. table for 2007, therefore, was not included in this analysis. BACKGROUND AND TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES Background traffic volumes were developed using multiple sources. Specific Link volUnie data were provided by the Collier County Transportation Department. Data reviewed included Collier County AUIR. for 2007. The Appendix contains copies of the applicable data used. The Collier County AADT data (see Appendix) on County Barn Road south of Davis Boulevard shows negative growth in 2007. Per Collier County TIS guidelines, a 2% grmmh rate was used in background traffic projection analysis for County Barn Road. Buildout year 2013 background Cope Reserve RPUD TIS Page 4 1:\Projero\81 1\81 I 33\Traflk\81 133RPUDTlS_Ol.doc Packet Page -2199- tbrou~ traffic volumes on County Barn Road were projected from AUIR 2007 peak hour volumes and used in link LOS analysis in this report. This is the methodology that is currently in I use b~ Collier County for tracking the availability of reserve capacity on specific roadway links as p~ of their concurrency management efforts. I I Table; 4 presents the link-specific background traffic data with the information contained in the ! Collier County AUIR table for 2007 and used in the link LOS analyses. i I TablJ 4 i BACK~ROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES Based o~ Collier County AUIR Table for 2007 ~ r-- '"" E CD --- . ! Road Se~ments From j LOS Directional # LOS Max PKHr Trip Total Remaining Lanes SID Service Volume Bank Volume Capacity 2 D 860 650 160 810 50 '"" '"" o N - ""'" '"" - <.0 To County Barn Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road Davis Boulevard The background traffic with a growth rate of 2% was computed for the link and is shown in ! TabId 5. I i I Tabl~ 5 . i I PROJ!=CTED GROWTH RATE AND BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES I Based ~n Historical ADT I ! !wnk i CountyiBarn Road From 12 Rattlesnake Hammock Road Davis Boulevard i Historic:a~ ADT daa. used frem Collier Count)' Tnffic Count 2007 i I CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Growth Rue DPK Hr Vol REM per of 2007 2013 CAPY CN'Y CAPY 2.0% 732 12B 85.1 % 650 B60 I LINK ANALYSES ! I Link !Levels of Service were evaluated for both Background and Total Traffic conditions for this I projebt. The Performance Standard Maximum Service Flow rates (SFmax) for different roadway I se~ents were provided by the Collier County Transportation Planning Department with the ! Au:r:R. Table. Copies of these data are contained in the Appendix. Table 6 presents the link I anal~sis results. I i i Cope ~eserve RPUD TIS i I I I I i Page 5 . 1:\ProjeaslBll\81133\T",fficIBI133RPUDTlS_Ol.doc . . . Table 6 LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS RESULTS (2013) Road Sei'TTlents From Th County Barn Road County Barn Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road Cope Lane Cope Lane Davis Boulevard 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. PM PEAK W/I Std BKGD Project Total AUIR WII Std BKGD + Tldffic Tldffic Tldffic LOS Std BKGD Project 732 732 16 9 y y y y 748 741 B60 860 The studied links are projected to meet the level of service standards for the PM peak hours with buildout year Background and Total Traffic. The analyzed roadway segments are projected to operate within SFmw:. Based on this analytical result, no further analyses are required. In addition it should be noted that the County has decided to increase the 1aneage on the proposed Santa Barbara Boulevard extension from four (4) lanes to six (6) lanes instead of expanding County Barn Road from two (2) lanes to four (4) lanes to address capacity issues in this area. Line 10.0 on the 2007 AUIR. for County Barn Road notes the road is expected to be deficient in 2008 with the fix being the Santa Barbara Boulevard extension as a parallel roadway. With the traffic on County Barn Road actually decreasing in 2007 (see Count Data in Appendix), the road is not projected to fail within the five (5) year consistency analysis period with the project (see Tables 5 & 6). In addition, if there is any consistency issue on County Barn Road, the Santa Barbara Boulevard extension will address those because it is anticipated that trips will be diverted from County Barn Road to the Santa Barbara Boulevard extension. Therefore, we do not believe there are any consistency issues on County Barn Road. The only mitigation necessary for the project is paying of appropriate Road Impact Fees. Cope Reserve RPUD TIS Page 6 1:\Projeas\811\81133\Traffic\81133RPUDTIS_0J.doc Packet Page -2201- ~ "- ...- E (l) ..... ...- ...- a N - ~ ...- - <D . I AppENDIX . Collier County AUIR for 2007 · Collier County Traffic Count Data 2007 . . Cope Rdserve RPUD TIS I I I I Appendix . . ". COPE RESERVE RPUD Location Map Exhibit 1 1,000 , . Dale: 02-21-08 Highland Properties of Lee and Collier, LId. o 1,000 , Feet ~ ~ Packet Page -2203- Vanasse Daylor 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. Urban Planning I..ndscap! Archil!tlUIl Civil Engimnng Tr.dfit Engin!enng ~ Environmental Sci,nt! Fl ]66 Sources: Collier County PA and Aerials Express. Inc. (Photo Date Jan. 2007) It is the end user's responsibility to verify the data contained hereon.. Project Number. B1133 Y:\Projects\B00I811\B1133\B1133-Ex1.mxd <t; r-- ~ E Q) ........ ~ ~ o N - ~ ~ - CD N . W-QE S I I Notto Sc:al~ Vana~se .. Daylpr e~~~~ i ~~;;r1!f~~itJ -g o c:: C l.. ... aJ b- e: =' o U ~ ~50% o U'l ~ r- 50% Urbll ~ ltliit ElIpl!lizg bm~e ~ tmirDlIIltIltll imDtl fnil ED;nllilz Il 366 1ID11.w "''''''1 Wml.loi!t ll!O hit nJU'_1I JJlOf I BI.U1..1iOt ,llWlAl3l "n:ollJ..... Davis Boulevard Cope Lane ~ ~ o LI't 100% --,. Project Site Rattlesnake Hammock Road J'i1Q'm:D fa," Highland Properties of Lee and C01lier, Ltd. 2223 Trade Center Way Naples. Florida 34109 February 2008 2 ~ ... .0 -c l.. l.. ... .. aJ ~ ~:5 c 0 Jl aJ ~ ~ o o lACE mu. Cope Reserve RPUD Traffic Distribution EXHIBIT 2 . . . . . . N W<>E S Not to Scale Vanasse Daylor "'C oS o c::: c: .... oS to ?:- c: :J o U 4-15 LI'l ~ -r- IS UrcJIl Phnning ln1fic El)ginwiD: Un~Qpe ktbillalrol b1riroli1i1'.l11f 10"" !ml En~..trlng ft 366 lIDO iN .!i"''1I~!oil, &10 Imlllpn. n Illl! .2lt1lWOI .2JUllUl' .~'I.tllol Davis Boulevard Cope Lane ~ 10 -", LI'l Project Site Rattlesnake Hammock Road li1J'.wJJ fO~ Highland Properties of Lee and Collier. Ltd. 2223 Trade Center Way Naples, Florida 341.09 February 2008 Packet Page -2205- 2 ~ ..c "'C .... .... .. oS aJ > ~ -3 c: 0 .J!l to ~ o M 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. r..llZ~ Cope Reserve RPUD AM Peak Hour Trip Assignment EXHIBIT 3 ~ I"- ... E Cl> ...... ... ... o N - ~ ... - CO N . WQE S ' Not to Scale I i I V'..............--. ana~se . Daylbr ~:~ ! }~j:'$ai?l I i I I , i j -0 nl o a:: l: L. .. <Xl ~ l: ~ o U ..., 4-9 ~ -r-9 vm. PlDiItt lr.ilc fl1V.umg bHIapt Wir.-am fminlllDtlllil Stiaa Gril .fliag lUll lID' ill! Iritllof WiltL !lilt 1IO 1000KJIlI.An~1 I13UllAIDI ,o"Ull..l!U ._~.." Davis Boulevard Cope Lane ~ ..., 32 ~ Project Site Rattlesnake Hammock Road 1'ZlI'~1DJ/t Highland Properties of Lee and Collier, Ltd. 2223 Trade Center Way Naples. Florida 34109 February 200B 2 nl L. nl .0 -c L. L. nl ... <Xl > 19 "* ~ 0 '" <Xl ~ co '.ICE mu: Cope Reserve RPUD PM Peak Hour Trip Assignment EXHIBIT 4 . . . . . . '1!...Jj i-sr .:l>:L ~u ~ 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. :;:. :; .." ~i I ~ . 1 I I . , . 1 , . . I .... I . . . . . .. '. . , ,....~.~'..i.~.;.,... ~~',"., I ~ I .. '.1 . ,r I' ~ . I . . , t 'i f L E ;; c .!. -: .e. t It 'j ~ .i . ,. ~ .il f; ~- 1 i' f. 1. ! J!: ': ; ! I ., .1 ~ i ! l' a :s .'" k ! ~ ~ l .~ ! 'UJl! ~ ~i! - ! ~ l i ~. ~ .. 3 B 1:. ~.- ~:l D ,< < c: . a i ~ 1j2 i . l' ..~ r . o ... Ji", ~<:Il! ~'b $.i ~ .; ~ i:hj'~ ~'l~', ~ ! !:;!o n ~ B :G~ SA ~ g~ Ii . ~ f.r ! C1;: -E. ~ ~ "i! ~ !: ! ~ > s!i il ~ H ~ .Ii i .. i 'i -1.. a; ~ ; ~ O' il ~ i " ~j ; i il ~ .. :l:l a ~ E: ~ 9 '.,;.. " i ~ Q B :: cJ' ~ I: III S ll.~ ;i! .~ " :; :i! - = i s ! ~ i ;l ~ ~ ~ l! ;1i ~ Bu il B )!; c 0 .. - ~ :: ... ~ D ! D ~ :; :: ... 5t ~ ~ Ii ~ ~ J J ~ s - i 1 ~ =,. = 1 J ~ a i a ~ = fi ~ ~ ~ q : ~ no lQ ~ : ~ e e ... a Ii -! :! ~.:.. g H ~~ l ~ . Ii I: . = ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ .l :; - .ri ....1i:r; _ . fii'f'Ll r~d.~. ~ r ti .:j.' rl 1 e. '-::i il! < ~-'~' ~ ~ ~~ .. ~- i! .H il ~ ~ t1 Q r:: II. p ~ i;i = . Li .q .tI. . . ~ ;; = ... . g~ ;; Ii ~~ n .. ~ ro ~~ ~ : . __ 5' ~ ~ ~ II s : ~ II n . ~!! ID '" a ~ ~ 00 &:: p.:~ ~ ! ! De.. ",_oa ~ ~ ;. i!~ c Ii! ~ ~ ! ~ "., . 1'1 .. " d ~q c Iil P. c. a. .b ~ =U1 e . ). 5l ~e !l " _ i .. ~ ;;~ c S j i it J r j~; ~ ~ ~ ~ 7m Jl C 'f j~ ~ .! j~ ~ . j ~ ~ ~ :i! ~ t . ~ S ~ ~~ ~; ;i J~ j · 1 .il! 1! ! J .~ ;! s i l ~ ~ ~ b = , .~ ~ E - ~ ~ .. .1 8: ::! il c . .. g :r .. II 8 $I Ii 'll r ti. " _ _ ~~ ~. . ~ 5~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t: fi '"' ": ,., ~ ~ :l ~ :;I i a 3 J ~ " . ~ Ii ~ ! :; ~ ~ ! j ~ .~ ~ ~ l j ~ 3 ~ v. :J H 11~ , r' ~ ~ ~ uu 1::.:::=-0 ~DLJ eeli'lJ":' :" tJ ,~ !5 ~~~~. '~i.~~;q ~ ~ ; ~ aa ~;~~ ~M ~~~ "". s ~ : :!! OIl" a~,,~:" llH .il lil !! ~ c !!il. n";"-. . "!" ~ " ~ se..:e .... ~_ li!~ u. ,:~=5 ~ ~ ~ 11 D . ~ ~ . Caco 6~ c . c p ~~ $o:.~~' ~~ ese.. e . ,= .,,~ ~ M iI 11 A J ! ~ ~ ~ .If I. E ~ ~ ! ! ;.~f ! 3 f ~J i S j i ~ l!~. ~A a d ~~ d ~ ! J ~ - ~5 e ~a "i i ~.] E L ~ fl :J t~ 15 i3 3~ d ! i ~ ! ~ zc a ., i g ~ ~ B .... ~ eu ~ u ~~ ... lb i ~ ;. n ill:; . ~~ E ~ 9 ~.. . :: = ii ii s :: t.. :z.. .. :!i! it n : ~ ~~ ~ ; ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ Packet Page -2207- . 5 " ~ D D ~.:5 Ii ~.:: ] ~ ~ j ~j :i ~ Gt5 3 i5 tI ~ ~ ~ ~. iJ ~ " D ~ E i -i Ii ~ ~ j ! :: ::i'" ::: ...~ a :: :: ~ ~ a~ ~ ij~ ~ ~ lICe ~ I ;; .. ~ .. ! 'l ::l .. ~ i i s S ~ ~ .. ! . ~ . 1 ~ ! t I J .. J ~ i ~ " ~ u ij .. S T I' ~ f'... ~ E Q) ....... ~ ~ o N - 'I;t ~ - <0 ,Collier County A.ver~ge D,aHy 'traffic (ADn -Counts' (Fiy~ Yeai'"Hi$t~r.r Liftt~d Alplil$~icaIli) s n A s' T t n , 2: 't 20Q3 20!!4, ,2,ODp 20.07 Q 2DD6 ehange a Dj p ACT ' , m location ADT A1JT ADT ISel! ADT t a D' e IS." ISn N~tli ISeB~ole (S'ee Nol.. OS;'[)7(see' 1 i 7i ,N~iI'I, ' if iI, NDle") 1} Nilte2} 0- I : e , 529 ! Q 90lJrily Bam,~~ no~ clR'al!!e~n~~~ H~[Il RilI9f.t~!M) (C,qunty -6.65% ZOO i FBclllly Road Ma1nlei1a~ce FaciO.!y m<1VB~ 10 Palll,s ~ 2DO~} 11;354 '11.474 8,552 1'2,078 '111275 .-iQ , .. ~"l . . .. J"" ,64,1 A ICountv'Barn Rttsouth of CC.R&8 F-aCllily 15,005 :t?~~~m 130m 17,~26 ,15;275 ,-12:56% ~~j 11 519 Q' Icountv REin Rd..soutl:i drDavis Slvd 15'R B41 . .. ". 1'4124 ~ :1'3.837' 11.4US 14.48j '13.'577 -7'50% ....'i I .. 559 I Q' DaVIs, Blvd"(SR84)-east of-Airport Rd '(CR31). '3D,tBa '30.-79& ' '32,Q83 30;9851 28;576 Q.77% . . "- 558 . Q Davis BlvtlISR84;.westof AirportRd CC&-311- 32,686, B3;94~ ,~6j4M' 3Z1,-68Q '31,394 -9.49.% 60t i' Q Daills:B]vd(SR:B4rWesl of Collier Blvd feR 951'1 ,22;92Q 25;969 ~ 26'...-j4~' 24;495 '007.'36% 560 ! Q, Davls,'Blvd,{SR ail) west dfRadio.-RdICRB5Sl 14,2011 14,965 1.6;475 17;045 15;~6'l "8,-{)8% SSB' c! . Q Oaviil:Blvd TS~ 114lweslof Sanle 'Baroat.rBlvi:I :30;7:89 32;561 34.781 33/289 ..-::~~":1.~( 638 i A Desoto. Bii1d:north:of-Golden Gate,BIV!! {CRIi'i61 1,365. t.S85 2;254- 2;207. 2;597 17;6.7% 639 ' i 'A, Desolo Bhtd',sliUth 'of Bl5It1erd3ale"BlveUCRB76) liS22 2,039 2,324 ' 2,661 ,2,&.43' -4;43% '7-04 I S Elkcam"Cin:teeast'of Billd'Eaaie Dr (CRS5'3) .. .7.;7:56 '6;94Q Discont.. Discont Dlseoiil., 705 : S Elkcam :Girble.wesl'of B'ald'Eildle"C(ccR9!!:3) 4';3~a :A;686 Discont.. DlscQnt. ~ Disc:ont! 6SS ; S Evemlades Blvd. norih'of Golden Gale Blvd lCR'li7SY 5.8'7 6;'520, 8,1 Oft "B,090 7,490 ~.7,41% 635 i S Even:IlEiiles.SfvQ north .tiHYlIWti\1I' Ro'/eR 858) '3,'974 <5.328 a.49'f ' 7,,1.63 :6,61 B. , -7:61'0/0' 637 , S Everolades 'Blvd:soollHiY,GoIden',Gale:Blvd .(CR67-6Y 4;S'l6 ,5;612 5~878 , ,6,765 5.154 ' -14JMo/o' 549: , Q, FirSt St south (OR B'4ilj sOl1tli,ofM8lrr St'CSR:2S) 12;945 12;856 13~7.82 . , , f4,671 531 i Q IGolden Gate'Blvd (CR1l7..6i east.ofClillierBJild (eR.'95:n '25,:368 ~~J 30,8,16 27;915 -9.42% 652- . I Q, Goldeh'Gale BMl (cttBi,s).easl' of Wilson Blv!!' 15,80:1' 17,:1901 19;665119,089. '17,626 '~~66,*, 678 C! .Q' GolBen ,Gale'Blvd lCR87S) wesl'ofWilsoi\,81i1a ~6~r"'FFar n 508 C: Q .Goleen Gale P M\"(CRBBS}'east ofAtri:Jort.Rd {CR'31l 28;877 ' .~~,.:;--:": 691 : Q GoIElen'Gale:? <WVCCR 8B5) e-ast, of bhiioQsfun ReadieR eSH 28;860 '34,585 605 t:;i t;l Golden Gate'P MviGR88Sreast of Santa Barbara,Blvd. 31;042 ,29,124 29,669 28,562 ::;::C::-.:::~ 5a7 c: Q Golden Gate 'p a;;;v.(CR-8Bffi.West of Alroort Rd {GR'St) . 44,592 45;594 ,38;'179 = . ~ :"'~:::;:;':;':' 510 : Q, Gl:ilden Gate P My'IOR BB5i west-of .Gollier-BJiltHcR951} .. ";~~rl':~~ 17$6 -5.55% 530 " Q Golden Gale ?kVlVlcR,e8sj ~'ie5f1lf ,Goo'Qlelte Rff /OR'8S1) 23;119 2~'617 21, =-c- 27;9M I :509 I IQ Golden Gale Pkwv.tCR BB6) west of Sanla 'Bamara' Blvd 29,-1-9428,'811 18.01'1.. I 505 c Q Goodrelte 'Rd{cfil. 851) 'north df. 22nD,~\1Ei'!1iirth 38 ,0.9.3 '.31 ,411 :595 Q Goodlette Rd:~CR:8&1) nortll,of Oraneie:Blossom Or E:.:L'i~ ~~~~~ 17.302. .20'269 ,20'26.3 ',0.03% .._....._t:OLo~.r ..'-_.,. , 581 Q 8noalette Rd {CR S51}north.of Pine Ridil~Rd TCR1!96) :':'~,,,-,...~ ~ 2!1,892 '25,,783' . '3.58% ,5.69 Q GoodlBtle Rd:tCRS51) so'Ulh ofFirlitAve.SoDlh ,.. 28.-824, 29;06'4 . 2B,28B 29;304 27;9$ -4.59% .., ,504 ,-a G.oodletle Rd(CR,'851) solith pf'.GoltleriGate,PRWv:,(CRBB5) 3"020- ',3B.243 5Q,7:71: ,35;368 35.591. 0.63"10 ,594 Q' GoodleUe Rll TOR 651) south oflmmokalee'Rtl '(GR846T . -,'12;3111 tl,BOla- 12,987 . 14.266 13;446 ,5.15~k 596 Q Gopdletle Rd.CCR85.jjsblilli bf:Oi'in:1ceBJossom Oi'" .'.::,::...:~_::~ B..t~ '2'1.284: ,.23;:1:50 ,23'j346 0.85.% 506 C Q Gotidlette Rd(CR851l:'soulh,cifPih'e F.Udae RiiTclt89Bl ' :3j ;450: '29';661' 27;267 ..;.:;,!;;j.~=~'; .' .6'42 I Q. Green:8Ivo.ciu;t cif5.aAla Bamara'!3[v.d ,t3;862 1~;Q61 1'4,214 ," 1~;'21'3 11;:n9 -1zt33% I 64~ I Q Gr.een Blvd westof.Collier Blvd CeR95-"- 1;893: 8;582 8;749: '8,5l9 7..208 -15.39% I 583 ! A GlilfshQre D.r' soi.J1H.of Bawlew Cf > - '5,545 5;723 7,24.f)- 'l,988 ' 3;964 -20;53% 714 I S Hsathviood Dr north of Sari Marco f)r /~R 921. 6,9t8 6,:701Jl DlsCO"nl: Dis'conl: DisClOnl 715 ! S HeaThwoodD(sotfth of San Marco Dr(c1H21. . ,5,459 5,515 DjscClht Disconl. [;)jsCont. 675 C', Q Immlikalee RO{B46}'east ofWJls6n Elitd 23;571 25,97Q Slb~-~ '.,- - :-1.1'. .:~.:..:.. 625 ci Q JinmOkale.e'Rd [CR.546\ eastof Goodlette Rd,'CCRB&1} :40;590 <"lI 44,23l1 .:.~:,,::':-i:-"'~~ 56'1- oj Q ImmokaJee.Rd'(CR.8:45) east of Ninon Rd (CR,:!11 44,~Q 46;05.1 - ..::~ '':i:. . . :'--.-;-" 593 ci Q ,Immokalee Rd (CRIl46) east of-Collier BlVd {CR9S1) 24,231 23,363 :29,tl95 :.1.~;"-:'i'~=,:' 568 01 Q hilmcikalee Rd 'COR 'il46) east of l-('S /SR-S3} . i.'.. 1 42,933, 4M88 AB;794 ... L.\-:"-ii: 56S cj Q lmmokalee Rd ceR 1146) east orus lit (SR:45) (T.amianirTraIlJ 38,985 ' oit2,OB6 ~J <40..288. _.' ':. 620 ! .Q IrnmoKalee Rd (CR 84Sl' nO'rth,of stockade:Rd .6,685 8,21'1 .8i4221 ''\ 0,:285 10,648' 3.52% 586 ci Q Immokalee Rd CeR 846\ south of OIl'Well Rd (CRes6) 16,537 ,~~~i~ ..... _. 18,172 .. .. 565 ! IQ Immokalee Rd iCR 846) west or us 41'(.CR45lTi"smiarniTI'2l1) 17,481 18,991 Hl,168 ' 16.66,4 15,68S -5:87% 656 . I Q Immokalee RdTCR S46)-West of. Collier Blvd (CR951) ,.25,787 27,431 ~~.- oo .c: 672 , Q Immokalee Road /846) :2 Triiles east lif Ellerillades Blvd. 4,733 <'806~1~(~3: -10.80% 68.4, i Q Immokalee Road (Cf{'846 Ess.t13 miles east 01 29,SoUlh 1i3a2 1,434' , c"'_,,- , ' 679 , Q lmmoka'lee Road (CR 646) W'esl.o(I-75 {SR 93} ': ~t;j,345 ' ::", -:i=<: ci .. 674. ; Ci Immokalee Road (CR 8'46\ west of Wilson Blvd 21.380 21;27 21.523' , . 3 . . NOTES: I 1~ .Ati sia~cns wIUj.;m anomalieP9 natshow an ADT; reference the Qaartorly Report. 2. The.chrng&06-07IS not shown If.. StaUOIl shows an anomalle. . I i I I i I I i i I Page~ 3.,B Ql15. January .2cioB .... . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. COPE RESERVE . COLLIER COUNTY' ENVIRONMEN.TAL IMPACT STATEl\1ENT . August 2007 . . Revised February 2008 Relised December 2008; " . . Prepared For: Highland Properties of Lee and Collier, Ltd. ,: 2223 Trade Center Way Naples,.Florida 34109-2035 (239) .593-0202 Prepared By: Passarella~ & Associates; lne. .13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite. 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274-0067 ., - Project No. 0513CC1255 Packet Page -2209- <C l'- ...- TABLE OF CONTENTS . Page , ! I Introduction........................... .................... ................... ........................ ................. .........................1 I ! 10.02.0~ (A) 4. Information Required for Application .............................................................1 i a. ~pplicant Information. ........ ..... ........... ............... .................................. ............... ........ .......1 ~ b. ~apping and Support Graphics .........................................................................................1 ...- ...- o N - ~ ...- - co c. Project Description and GMP Consistency Determination ................................................4 ! d. ~ative Vegetation Preservation....... ....... ....... ............ ......... .................... .......... ....... ........... 6 I i e. VI etlands ............ .................. ............ .......... ........ ..................... ............... ......... ..... ..............9 I I f. ~urface and Groundwater Management ...........................................................................10 I g. rtisted Species.... ........ ........... .......... ...... ............... ....... ........... ....... ........... ...... .............. ..... .11 I i i h. C1>ther ............................. ....... ......... .......... ...... ........ ...................... .............. ..... ................... .14 ! i I I I References........... ... ...... ... ................. ....... ... ........ ........... ....... ....... ... ... ................. ....... ........ .... ....... .15 . . 1 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . INTRODUCTION This report represents the Collier County Environmental Impact Statement (ElS) for Cope Reserve (project). This ElS has been prepared in accordance with Chapter 10.02.02 (A) 4 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) (October 30, 1991, as amended February 27, 2004). 10.02.02 (A) 4. INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR APPLICATION a. Applicant Infonnation. i. Responsible person who wrote the EIS and his/her education and job related environmental experience. Andrew Woodruff of Passarella & Associates, Inc., Consulting Ecologists. A copy of Mr. Woodruff's resume is enclosed as Exhibit ,1. ii. ' Owner(s)lagent(s) name, address, phone number, and e-mail address. Highland Properties of Lee and Collier, Ltd. 2223 Trade Center Way Naples, Florida 34109-2035 '. (239) 593-0202 b. Mapping and Support Graphics i. General location map. A project location map is provided as Figure 1. ii. Native habitats and their boundaries shall be identified on an aerial photograph of the site extending at least two hundred (200) feet outside the parcel boundary. This does not mean the applicant is required to go onto adjoining properties. Habitat identification consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation - Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification Svstem rFLUCFCS)(J999) shall be depicted on an aerial photograph having a scale of one inch equal to at least 200 feet when available from the county. Other scale aerials may be used where appropriate for the size of the project, provided the photograph and overlays are legible at the scale provided. A legend for each of the FLUCFCS categories found on-site shall be included on the aerial. An aerial with FLUCFCS and wetlands map is enclosed as Exhibit 2. Native habitats and their boundaries have been identified on the aerial. The mapping extends at least 200 feet outside of the boundary of the property. . 1 Packet Page -2211- E Q) ..... N *d' W E "P'\. s . 4 L i i I 1-76 ~ ~ l'- -- ! i FIGURE 1. PROrnCf LOCATION MAP I COPE! RESERVE J.I. 6/20/07 REVlEWED SY DAn; S.J. 6/20/07 REVISED DAtE . 2 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . iii. Topographic map and existing drainage patterns if applicable. Where possible, elevations within each of FLUCFCS categories shall be provided. A topographic map is enclosed as Exhibit 3. iv. Soils map at scale consistent with that used for Florida Department of Transportation - Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System determinations. A Collier County soils map of the property is provided as Exhibit 4 and a description of these soils is provided in Table 1. Table 1. Soil Types 'S" :i1'U '.t"':;- .;.i 'i';.:~~' ::-j.",;:,:~,:;":.~.~:,, I...f' 'n""~" '.i'p", ti.~.".. "".,,~. - ",. .0 . m. ,.;.....0<.,'.,."..............:;- escn on......""...".". . ..: .,..:~:..-_.:'"~..'::..~~:.;. ......::.' _: . .. .' I .~.' .,":' !"-. 2 Holopaw Fine Sand; Limestone Substratum 14 Pineda Fine Sand; Limestone Substratum 32 Urban Land , Status Hydric Hydric Non-Hydric v. Proposed drainage plan indicating basic flow patterns, outfall, and ofJ-si~e drainage. . The conceptual water management plan prepared by Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. is enclosed as Exhibit 5. vi. Development plan including phasing program, service area of existing and proposed public facilities, and existing and proposed transportation network in the impact area. The conceptual master plan prepared by Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. is enclosed as Exhibit 6. The development will occur in a single phase. vii. Site plan showingpreserves on-site, and how they align with preserves on adjoining and neighboringproperties. Include on the plan locations of proposed and existing development, roads, and areas for stormwater retention, as shown on approved master plans for these sites, as well as public owned conservations lands, conservation acquisition area, major flow ways and potential wildlife corridors. Please see the aerial with on-site preserves enclosed as Exhibit 7. The proposed on- site preserve areas are not knov.rn to abut off-site preserve areas. The on-site preserve is bordered on the north by disturbed land along Cope Lane; on the east by undeveloped, forested land; on the south by disturbed land along a church; and on the west by disturbed land along County Barn Road. There are no flow-ways or wildlife corridors associated with the on-site preserve area. . 3 Packet Page -2213- iif' ! For properties in the RLSA and RFMU D~stricts, a site plan showingthe location of the site, and land use designations and overlays as identified in the Growth Management Plan (GW). . Please see the project location with land use designations map enclosed as Exhibit 8. i c. Project Description and GW Consistency Determination ! i.1 i ~ I"'-- ~ E (1.) ....... ~ ~ 0 N - """ ~ - CD Provide an overall description of the project with respect to environmental and water management issues. The Cope Reserve property is 14.31:f: acres and is located in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (Figure 1). More specifically, the parcel lies to the southeast of the intersection of County Barn Road and Cope Lane. The parcel's surrounding land uses are a mixture of single-family residential developments; institutional development; roadways; borrow area; and undeveloped, forested land. The site is generally bordered on the north by a borrow area and Cope Lane; on the south by a church and undeveloped, forested land; on the east by undeveloped, forested land and single-family conventionally zoned property; and on the west by County Barn Road. The proposed Project is for a single-family residential community. In general, the site plan was designed to develop a single-family.residential community while maintaining upland and wetland preserves along the north, south, and west property boundaries. . It is estimated that there are 13 .29:f: acres of wetlands on the Proj ectsite. Wetlands on the Project site have been impacted by exotic species, particularly melaleuca (A1elaleuca quinquenervia) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). The majority of the wetland impacts will occur to low quality habitats with greater than 50 percent cover of exotic vegetation. The Project proposes to preserve 1.92:f: acres of native vegetation 'within the Project site. Two listed plant species were observed on the Project site. Two Florida butterfly orchids (Encyclia tampensis) were observed in the Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E2) habitat. Two Florida butterfly orchids and one giant wild pine (Tillandsia utriculata) were observed in the Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3) habitat. The preserve location as proposed was based on several factors. By locating the preserve on the western portion of the property, the preserve will be located within higher quality wetlands. The preserve will be incorporating the three areas mapped . 4 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . as Palmetto Prairies, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 3219 E1); Pine Platwoods, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E1); and Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) (FLUCPCS Code 6249 E2). Per Policy 6.1.1(4) of the CCME of the GMP, the proposed preserve area consists of wetlands known to be utilized by listed plant species. Drainage for the Project will be directed to the on-site dry detention areas before overflowing into the preserve areas and ultimately discharging off-site into the County Barn Road roadside swale. Additionally, the wet season water table elevation of the Project will be 8.40 feetNGVD and the dry season water table will be 6.40 feet NGVD, which is consistent with adjacent properties and on-site water level indicators. These elevations have been shown by experience to adequately address water management needs in the area while providing adequate hydration of the on- site preserve areas. ii. Explain how the project is consistent with each of the Objectives and Policies in the CCME of the GMP, where applicable. The Project as proposed is consistent with the Obj ectives and Policies in Goals 6 and 7 of the CCME of the GMP, for the following reasons: . . Fifteen percent of the existing native vegetation will be retained on-site and set aside as preserve areas with a conservation easement dedicated to Collier County prohibiting further development. Selection of preservation areas are consistent with the criteria listed in Policies 6.1.1. and 7.1.2. . Per Policy 6.1.1 (2), the proposed preserve emphasizes the largest contiguous area possible which will provide a core area that has the greatest potential for wildlife habitat. The preserve will be located within higher quality wetlands on the western portion of the property, which can serve as a core area for wildlife habitats. . Per Policy 6.1.1(3), native- vegetation preserves shall be protected by a conservation easement prohibiting further development . Per Policy 6.1.1(4), the proposed preserve area consists of wetlands mown to be utilized by listed plant species. . Per Policy 6.1.1 (6), a preserve area and listed species management plan has been prepared to ensure that the preserved areas will maintain natural diversity and will function as proposed. The preserve area and listed species management plan is attached as Exhibit 9. . . The requirement for an EIS pursuant to Policy 6.1.8 has been satisfied. 5 Packet Page -2215- << ""'" ~ E Cl) ..... ~ ~ 0 d N - ~ ~ - <.0 . A wetland jurisdictional determination has been conducted on the Proj ect site by . the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) in accordance with Policy 6.2.1. Approved wetland lines are depicted on the aerial with FLUCFCS and wetlands map attached as Exhibit 2. . Per Policy 6.2.6, the required wetland preservation areas and buffer areas shall be dedicated as conservation and common areas in the form of conservation easements and shall be identified or platted as separate tracts. These areas shall also be depicted on the PUD Master Plan. . Per Policy 7.1.2(2) a.l, management plans shall be prepared incorporating proper techniques to protect listed species and their habitat from the negative impacts of the proposed development A preserve area and listed species management plan is attached as Exhibit 9. Vegetation Preservation Identify the acreage and community type of all upland and wetland habitats found on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS). Provide a description of each of the FLUCFCS categories identified on-site by vegetation type (species), vegetation composition (canopy, mid- story, and ground cover), and vegetation dominance (dominant, common, and occasional). . Vegetation associations and land uses were delineated during on-site field surveys conducted in January 2005. Vegetation associations were updated during a site visit conducted with the SFWMD on October 6, 2008. An acreage breakdown of the habitat types is provided in Table 2. A description of each FLUCFCS type follows: Table 2. HabitatlFLUCFCS Types and Acreages FLUCFCS " " , "" "" " , P~rcfmt , Iiabitat ," Acreage Code of Total 3219 EI Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) 0.13 0.9 4119 El Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) 0.23 1.6 4119 E3 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) 0.62 4.3 4241 Melaleuca, Hydric 1.49 10.4 6249 E2 I Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 3.94 27.5 (25-49% Exotics) 6249 E3 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 7.86 54.9 (50-75% Exotics) 743 Spoil Areas 0.04 0.3 Total 14.31 100.0 . 6 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . Palmetto Prairies, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 3219 EI) This upland habitat has an open canopy. The sub-canopy includes wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) and dahoon holly (flex cassine). The ground cover is dominated by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) and includes wiregrass (Aristida stricta), bushy broomsedge (Andropogon glomeratus), and spermacoce (Sper",:ac..oce sp.). Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 En TIns upland habitat has a canopy of slash pine (Pinus elliottii), melaleuca, and Australian pine (Casuarina equisetijolia). The sub-canopy includes Brazilian pepper, myrsine (Rapanea punctata), and wax myrtle. The ground cover includes saw palmetto, little blue maidencane (Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum), myrsine, and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E3) This upland habitatis similar to that of FLUCFCS Code 4119 El, except with 50 to 75 percent cover of melaleuca. Melaleuca.. Hvdric (FLUCFCS Code 4241) This low quality wetland habitat has a canopy and sub-canopy of melaleuca.. Also found in the sub-canopy is Brazilian pepper and slash pine. The ground cover vegetation is sparse and contains scattered spermacoce, rush fuirena (Fuirena sci1poidea), and swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum). . Cypress/Pine/CabbalZe Palm, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E2) This wetland habitat has a canopy of slash pine, cypress (Taxodium distichum), ear- leaf acacia (Acacia aw.iculiformis), and melaleuca. The sub-canopy includes cypress, slash pine, wax myrtle, cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco), earleaf acacia, melaleuca, and Braiilian pepper. The ground cover vegetation includes guIfdune paspalum (PaspaZum monostachyum), rush fuirena, yellow-eyed grass (Xyris sp.), and asiatic pennywort (Centella asiatica). Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (50-7 5% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3) This wetland community is similar to that ofFLUCFCS Code 6249 El, except with 50 to 75 percent cover ofmelaleuca and Brazilian pepper. Spoil Areas (FLUCFCS Code 743) TIns upland land use has a canopy and sub-canopy of slash pine and melaleuca. The ground cover includes spermacoce and melaleuca. ii. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in Goal 6 of the CCME of the GMP, and Chapters 3 and 1 0 of the LDC. Provide an exhibit illustrating such Include calculations identifYing the acreage for preservation and impact, perFLUCFCS category. . 7 Packet Page -2217- A native vegetation map of the property is provided as Exhibit 10, and an acreage breakdown of these native habitats is provided in Table 3. . Table 3. Natiye Vegetation Habitat Type and Acreages E (l) ........ FLUCFcs -. Nativ-e Non-Native - Habitat .- Vegetation Vegetation C~de,_'-. .. . . , . . .. . . . :, Acrea2e Acreage .. - ..0-. " 3219 El Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed 0.13 (0-24% Exotics) - 4119 El Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed 0.23 (0-24% Exotics) - 4119 E3 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed 0.62 (50-75% Exotics) - 4241 Melaleuca, Hydric - 1.49 6249 E2 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 3.94 - (25-49% Exotics) 6249 E3 Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 7.86 - (50-75% Exotics) 743 Spoil Areas 0.04 - Totals 12.82 1.49 Minimum Retained Native Vegetation Requirement 1.92 (Native Vegetation Acrea2:e x 15%) . ~ l"- ~ ~ ~ o N - ~ ~ - <0 Fifteen percent of the native vegetation on the Project site will be set aside as a conservation easement in order to meet the native vegetation requirement (Exhibit 10). This on-site preserve area contains habitat types that are known to be utilized by listed species. For sites already cleared and in agricultural use, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation in Policy 6.1.5 of the CCME of the GMP and Chapters 4 and 10 of the LDe. For sites cleared prior to January 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP and LDe. Not applicable. Have preserves or acreage requirements for preservation previously been identified for the site during previous development order approvals? If so, identify the location and acreage of these preserves, and provide an explanation if they are different from what is proposed Not applicable. . 8 . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. v. For properties with Special Treatment "ST" overlays, show the ST overlay on the development plan and provide an explanation as to why these are being impacted or preserved Not applicable. e. Wetlands i. Define the number of acres of Collier County jurisdictional wetlands (pursuant to Policy 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 of the CCME of the GMP) according to the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FL UCFCS). Include a description of each of the FLUCFCS categories identified on-site by vegetation type (species), vegetation composition (canopy,' mid-st01Y, and ground cover), and vegetation dominance (dominant, common, and occasional). Wetland determinations are required to be verified by the SFWMD or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), prior to submission to the County. An acreage breakdown of the SFWMD wetlands located on-site is provided in Table 4. A description of the FLUCFCS categories has been provided above in response to 10.02.02 (A) 4(d)(i). Wetlands were verified in the field with SFWJ\.1D staff on October 6, 2008. The SFWMD wetland limits have been survey-located. Table 4. SFWMD/Collier County Wetlands FLUCFCS .. .' Code" 4241 6249 E2 Habitat. Acreage' . 1.49 3.94 Melaleuca, Hydric Cypress/Pine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) CypresslPine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) Total 7.86 13.29 6249 E3 ii. Determine seasonal and historic high water levels utilizing lichen lines or other biological indicators. Indicate how the project design improves/affects predevelopment hydroperiods. Provide a narrative addressing the anticipated control elevation(s) for the site. Nails marking biological indicators (i.e., stain lines, adventitious rooting, and moss lines) of wetland seasonal water levels were set in the field on March 21, 2006. The elevations of the nails were surveyed by Bruns & Bruns, Inc. The locations of the nails are depicted in Exhibit 3. Table 5 summarizes the nail elevations. Control elevations will be reviewed during the Environmental Resource Permit process with the SFWMD. 9 Packet Page -2219- ----- i I Table 5. Nail Elevations for 'Vetland Water Level Indicators . Nail No. Description, Nail Elevation (feet NG'VD) WL-l Bottom of moss, top of water stain on cypress 8.50 WL-2 Bottom of moss, top of water stain on cypress 8.53 WL-3 Bottom of moss, top of water stain on cypress 8.37 ~ i'i. Indicate the proposed percent of defined wetlands to be impacted and the effects of l'- proposed impacts on the functions of these wetlands. Provide an exhibit showing the ~ location of wetlands to be impacted and those to be preserved on-site. Describe how E impacts to wetlands have been minimized Q) ....... ~ I The construction of the Project will result in wetland impacts to approximately ~ i 0 11.37:J=. acres of on-site wetlands. Impacts will occm to wetland habitats with exotic N ! - vegetation coverage up to 75 percent. Please see the wetland impact map attached as v I ~ i Exhibit 11. - CD I i i " Indicate how the project design compensates for wetland impacts pursuant to the lV. ! Policies and Objectives in Goal 6 of the CCME of the GMP. For sites in the RFMU j ! District, provide an assessment based on the SFWMD's Uniform Mitigation i Assessment Method (UMAM) that has been accepted either by the SFWMD or FDEP. . I I For sites outside the RFMU District, and where higher quality wetlands are being i i retained on-site, provide justification based on the Ulv.fAM. J I i ! ! Wetland impacts will be permitted through the SFWMD. , f Surface and Groundwater Management i i '1 Provide an overall description of the proposed water management system explaining l, I how it works, the basis of design, historical drainage flows, off-site flows coming in to the system and how they will be incorporated in the system or passed around the system, positive outfall availability, Wet Season Water Table and Dry Season Water Table, and how they were determined, and any other pertinent information pertaining to the control of the storm and ground water. The water management system is being designed by Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P .A. As previously stated, drainage for the Project will be directed to the on-site dry detention areas before overflowing into the preserve areas and ultimately discharging off-site into the County Barn Road roadside swale. Additionally, the wet season water table elevation of the Proj ect will be 8.40 feet NGVD and the dry season water table will be 6.40 feet NGVD, which is consistent with adjacent properties and on- site water level indicators. These elevations have been shown by experience to . 10 . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. adequately address water management needs in the area while providing adequate hydration of the on-site preserve areas. ii. Provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected fi"om the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre-development conditions. This analysis is requiredfor projects impactingfive (5) or more acres of wetlands. The analysis shall be peiformed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies. A water quality loading analysis is currently being conducted by Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P .A. and will be provided under separate cover after the SFWMD permit has been approved. iii. Identify any Welljield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-S1) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs. No Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones exist within the Project area. g. Listed Species i. Provide a plant and animal species survey to include at a minimum, listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on-site, and conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and the u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). State actual survey times and dates and provide a map showing the location(s) of species of special status identified on-site. Please refer to the listed species survey provided as Exhibit 12. No listed wildlife species were observed on the property. Observed listed plant species are summarized in Table 6. Table 6. Listed Plant Species Observed on the Cope Reserve Property - ".-: ., ....:. -. ~ ~ :.',' - '. ... .....:..~.~..-:.;:~.~.>---~.:~~~..-": "~' . 'Scienti;fic Name' . < c~h1,hlb~N~Jrte Des"i~ated Stafus . Habitat 'FDACS'. USFWS (FLl!CFCS -. . Code) C - 6249 E - 6249 Encyclia tampensis Florida butterfly orchid Tillandsia utriculata Giant wild pine FDACS - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services USFWS - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service C - Commercially Exploited E - Endangered 11 Packet Page -2221- Additional field observations for state and federal listed species were conducted on the Project site from May 1 through 14,2006 during red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) (RCW) nesting season foraging surveys and on December 1,4 through 8, 11 through 15, and 18 through 20,2006 during RCW non-nesting season foraging surveys. The additional surveys were conducted to comply with the FWCC and USFWS guidelines. No RCWs were heard or observed during the May 2006 and December 2006 RCW foraging surveys. . ~ I"- ..- Identify all listed species that are known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on the site or that have been directly observed on the site. E Q) ...... Listed wildlife and plant species that have the potential to occur on the Project site are listed in Tables 7 and 8, respectively. Information used in assessing the potential occurrence of these species included Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida Volume 1. Mammals (Humphrey 1992); Volume III. Amphibians and Reptiles (Moler 1992); Volume V. Birds (Rodgers et al. 1996); and personal experience and knowledge of the geographic region. ..- ..- o N - oo:;t ..- - <.0 Table 7. Listed Wildlife Species That Could Potentially Occur on the Cope Reserve Property .,.....~~~,:~~~r..::\~~f~~~~~t. .;~t~;;;:~~~s . . . _ . h Go her frog SSC Eastern indigo T T snake Go her tortoise SSC 3219/4119 4119/6249 3219/4119 .;}~~i~~~~;t:~ir{z.';tt;g;4"~~~~'(i}~;~;~~k\~~\~~fi'i:;}~.Bii:di~::t};:~::'UM,~.1f.:;(:./;"':.'.~~';:~:?;:' .. ':-,-:". . -" : ~ :~.;"- -. ':.- Picoides borealis Red-cockaded wood ecker Southeastern Falco sparverius paulus American kestrel T E etta thula Snowy e!ITet SSC Eudocimus albus White ibis SSC _ ):':(:;-,',~~:::~"~~;/::\Z'~~\;~~:::;'{MammalS:.).;:,~'o' ~" Puma concolor coryi Florida anther E Big Cypress fox Sciurus niger avicennia s uirrel T E 4119 4119 6249 6249 E 4119/6249 4119 T . 12 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . Table 7. (Continued) . S~ientific Name::" .... .. ..._ ~. '. ~~ .. ~ ~ ;~? ~.: ~.; .~.. :. :~\ t : ,.:": ~~ .::~~.:~:: ~~~. '.:- :','.' . -.~~;:'. ~ .~ I; ~'~;.G~:~~~'~.:~~l:~. --;:i:';. . . 4119/6249 FWCC - Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission USFWS - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service E - Endangered S SC - Species of Special Concern T - Threatened Table 8. Listed Plant Species That Could Potentially Occur on the Cope Reserve Property h . .' .. '. ',.-, '. '. Desje;iIated Status Habitat ~.:!..:..~:~~j~~1.f'C"~~i~~L': _~:~:: '.:::::;~i~[.~&~~~~.?'~ !D~CS . USFWS (F~~~~CS Burmannia flava Fakahatchee E 4119 burmannia - Cyrtopodium punctatum Cowhorn orchid E - 6249 . Tillandsia pruinosa Fuzzy-wuzzy air E - 6249 plant Tillandsia utriculata Giant wild pine E - 6249/4119 Zamia floridana Florida coontie C - 4119 FDACS - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services USFWS - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service C - .Commercially Exploited E - Endangered iii. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to species of special status. Fifteen percent of the native vegetation will be preserved to provide habitat for listed species. Habitats known to be utilized by listed species will be preserved including CypresslPine/Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3). iv. Provide habitat management plans for each of the listed species known to occur on the property. For sites with bald eagle nests and/or nest protection zones, bald eagle management plans are required, copies of which shall be included as exhibits attached to the PUD documents, where applicable. A preserve area and listed species management plan is included as Exhibit 9. . 13 Packet Page -2223- ~ l'- -,:- E Cl.) ....... -,:- -,:- o N - ~ -,:- - (D h. : v.l , . 'Where applicable, include correspondence received from the FWCC and the USFWS, with regards to the project. Explain how the concerns of these agencies have been met. i i Other I ! I '1 1.: No correspondence has been received from either the FWCC or the USFWS regarding this Project. For multi-slip dockingfacilities with ten slips or more, andfor all marinafacilities, show how the project is consistent with the Marina Siting and other criteria in the Manatee Protection Plan. Not applicable. .l 11. Include the results of any environmental assessments and/or audits of the property. If applicable, provide a narrative of the cost and measures needed to clean up the site. i i i , I I i . ~ . lll. I I I ! i I ! Not applicable. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern - Special Treatment (ACSC-ST) overlay district, show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations establishedfor the ACSC-ST. . Not applicable. ! .i lV. I i Soil sampling or ground water monitoring reports and programs shall be required for sites that occupy old farm fields, old golf courses or for which there is a reasonable basis for believing that there has been previous contamination on site. nze amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by the Environmental Services staff along with the Pollution Control Department and the FDEP. , I I I I V. I ! Not applicable. Provide documentation for the Florida illaster Site File, Florida Department of State and any printed historic archaeological surveys that have been conducted on the project area. Locate any known historic or archaeological sites and their relationships to the proposed project design. Demonstrate how the project design preserves the historic/archaeological integrity of the site. The Proj ect will not impact any known historic or archaeological sites. According to the Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources (DHR), no cultural survey is required for the Project. Please see the DHR concurrence letter attached as Exhibit 13. . 14 .. . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. REFERENCES Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550-010-001.a. Third Edition. Humphrey, S.R. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume 1. Mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Moler, Paul E. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume m. Amphibians and Reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Rodgers, J.A., Jr., S.T. Schwikert, andA. Shapiro-Wenner. 1996. Nesting habitat of wood storks in north and central Florida, USA. Colonial Waterbirds 16:1-21. 15 Packet Page -2225- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. ORDINANCE NO. 2011- . i , i I i i I I I WI~AS,. D. Wayne Arnold. ATCP of Q. Grady Minor and A$sociate.s. P.A.., I r.eprdsenting Highland Properties of Lee and Collier, LTD. petitioned' the Board of County i . Comtnissioners to.cJlange"$.e zoningclas~ficalioQ ofthe herein described reaJ property. i . ! NOW.. 'l'I-ffiREFORE, BE IT ORDAJJ\1EO ,BY WE- BoARD OF- .cOUNTY ! ~ OR.l?lN~CE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, TBE. COL~~R COUNTY LAl\1J).. DEVELOP:MENT CODE,' WInCH INCLUDES. THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING :REGULATIONS FOR THII1~"lNCORPORATED AREA OF. .. ," -.. -. .. .. .COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE .. . . ., '. . . ..... . APPROPRIATE. ZONING. ATLAS MAP. OR MAPS; BY CHANCING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION. OF THE HEREIN DESCRIDEIJ REAL. P~OJ>ERtY FROM 'l"H:E EstATEs (E) iONJ:NG DISTRICT TO TEE RESIDENTIAL PLANNEl) UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONIN.G DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE COPE RES:ERVE RPUD. THE PROJECt PROPOSES. A tOTAL. OF 43 SIN.GLE FAMn..Y DET AQIED D\VELLLJ\I'G UNITS IN SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 .SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF +/- 14.3 ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING' AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (pETITION PUDZ-2007-AR-1.2292) . . I . cONtMrssroNERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: ! , . SECTION ONE: I I The zoning classificati~m of tl+e herein described real property located. in. Section &, ! . -T-ow4ship SO. $outh, Range 26 E.ast) Collier County, florida, isch~ged from an. Estates.. (E) ! ZOj]I~g District to. a.Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning DisLliet to be knQWTI. I . . I as Cppe Reserve RPUD in accordance with Exhibits A rhrough F atta:.ched hereto. and , inCOl~orat~d .herein and by refe.rence made 'part hereof. The appropricrte zoning atlas map or I i " ,. map$i as described' in Ordinance Number 2Q04-41~ as amended, the Collier County. Land I Deve10pment Code, islare herebyamended.accordingly. I I I I I i ! cOjJe:~eserv~:! PUDZ;.1b{n-AR-i:229~ . .:. Re\iisfC! 51 !:OIl 1 1 of 2.- i ! Packet Page -2226- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . SECTION TWO:, T:1iis Ordinanceshal1 bcc.om~effective tlponfiling with tbe Department ofStal~. . . PASSED AND ptn:.;y ADOPTED py the Board of County Commissioners of Collier. County,. Florida,. this day of ,2011. ATTEST: D:$..tl'Gr-IT E. BROCK, CLERK. BOARD @F COUNTY COM1v:ITSSrONERS OF COLLffiR COUNTY, FLORIDA ~ Deputy 'Clerk Approved as to form s,wi legq.-l ~uf.fi.ciency-: Steven T. WiHiai'i.ls . . ">110'\' Assistant GO;Lmt)' Attomey Attaci1meJ,its: Exhibit A - List ofPeill1itted Uses Exhibit B - Developmel'lt Staiidards (Table i} Exhibit C - COllcepma.1 M~ter. PIau Exhibit D - Legal D~cription Exhibit E - List 'QfRe.quested Deviatiens Exhibjt F - List 6fJ)ev\:llop~r Comm.itments. Exhibit G' - C.ope Lmie ProP9s~d Turn Lane. ExhibiT 02 ~ Cop~ Lane :Cross S:ection 07"cps.:n07#!:\Sl Cope-Reserve I PUDZ~2bo7-AR-12292 RevisedS/JO/l1 200. Packet Page -2227- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT A FOR COPE RESERVE RPUD . Reg:ulations for development of the Cope Reserve RPUD shall be in accordance witH the contents of this RPUD Document and applicable sections of the LDC and Groyvth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any devblopment order to which said regulations relate. Where this RPUO Ordinance do~s not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sec1ions of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. PERMITTED USES: I A maximum of 43 dwelling units shall be permitted within the RPUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family dwellings, detached. 2. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (!!.BZA") by the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). . B. Accessory Uses: 1. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 2. Recreational facilities such as parks, playgrounds, and pedestrian/bikeways. 3. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the principal uses permitted in this District, including but not limited to swimming pools, spas and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development, and essential services as described in Section 2.01 .03 of the LOC. 4. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. PRESERVE A. Principal Uses: . Rev 6 5-5-2011 Consent).doc Page 1 of9 AR-l2292, Cope Reserve RPUD Packet Page -2228- . . .. 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. 1. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or designee determines to be compatible in the Preserve Area. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibits B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUO Residential Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LOC in effect as of the date of approval of the SOP or subdivision plat. Rev 6 (CCPC 5-5-2011 Consent).doc AR-12292, Cope Reserve RPUD Page 2 of 9 Packet Page -2229- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT B FOR COPE RESERVE RPUD . DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS bEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE FAMilY DETACHED PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 5,000 S.F. PER UNIT 1 MINIMUt0 LOT WIDTH1 50 FEET , MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 S.F MIN FRONT V ARD2 20 FEET I MIN SIDElv ARD 6 FEET , I MIN REA~ Y ARD3 15 FEET MIN PRESiERVE SETBACK 25 FEET i MIN PUD PERIMETER SETBACK 25 FEET MIN. DIST~NCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 12 FEET MAX. BUI~DING HEIGHT ZONED : 35 FEET ACTUAL I 35 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES i FRONT i 20 FEET i SIDE 6 FEET REAR 1 0 FEET MIN PUD IPERIMETER SETBACK 20 FEET MIN PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET i DISTANC~ FROM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE 10 FEET UNLESS ATTACHED MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 35 FEET . * I - Minimurrj lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. I *2 - Building ~arages must be set back a minimum of 23 feet from edge of any provided sidewalk for front entry garages. Front yard may be reduc~d to 15 feet where the residence is served by a side-loaded or rear entry garage. *3 - Principal land accessory uses shall not be pennitted to encroach into any landscape buffer. i . i ! Rev 6! (CCPC 5-5-2011 Consent).doc . Page 3 of 9 AR-12292, Cope Reserve RPUD Packet Page -2230- . 1\ ----z----.-c .. ~ ,I . . % o ;:: ~.. ~~ ~tn ~::i ~fii "z 00 <>N ffi 3 o u I I ~ I I I ~ I I i I w II I ~'!l I' 8 U ~, Ii' I r- I ~ , I t~.' I t--~j.-< ~ i w~ I ~iil I ~~ bo:, I I! -. II I-- -i I' f!- -! w <> ~w ~~ "'/3 ~uJ ~ia u.z ~~ z iii w 1.:1.. l:1l!! ffi;$ "'.. ~~ ~.. u.fil WZ ~o ClN Z iii r , I i I i I i I i I i ffiU! ~ ! .. I .. I ~ i ; ! L Ii _ I II Ii i i Ii - i ! ~'__I- I [:'--'--'--' 1'------'1 !:z ,/ 110 , ::~ili : l!~~ \\ 110 , il '0;... !I..- J "" ~.. - '" ~~ 0:: _.__1____ ______0__.__.__.__._ .1,.....;--- - -, ( 0 I ~ili : ~~ I 0 I I ,--",,'" 0::: 0:: a. ~w~ ::ou>' <tZUI U.wW ~t1~ ClwO zo:w iii ts oJ N I 0:: 1_ _1_ _1--1-_1--,--.-_._-1--'__1 ZW OCl "'F~ ww~~f3 ~~~~~ b<wO.... It.llWa:lL~.. COUNTY BARN ROAD w ffi., 9\!:! f3~ 0:., ~~ ::;.. iEfiJ ~5 0'" z co '" ~ ::> .. ... w a. 1= 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. "-'1l111'V"'''''lla.l~''':lGS1.0I__~~JoIII)-~.~ ,. o ~., g~ ~~ oW Zul ~fii !Zz iS2 ~ '" w !'; .. '" w ~ w o ~ \< ~ <>., ~~ ;::.... <UI UW ffi~ zw <:Z ~2 w :e '" N -------- .~ ~ =' ;= o ~UI g~ ~t; OW ZuI ".. t;lil -z 132 ;; ,I -I -I ,I I Packet Page -2231- , ~ . ~ i ~ ~ i ; B g ~ ~ I ~ i' ~ 5; i : .~ ~ P I 8~ .! 5~ : ~ t' o~ -. ~, r. m n ~I ;,\ Ul:l:O ga: ....u... ffi~< ~I;; ::;;=t:: cJjif ~oiffi 5~a. ~~ ..\- ~~f2 "> ai~~ ~~ t;ZI= >"0 :;)1 Cl)ii)W :r0 tu~~ <>'" ~~o ~~ cn:r3 g~ g~[ Ww ~~~~ ~'i' o:~ -" ""'..\\3 =>u ~2nw S< ~:;~ "'.... ~~ ~sC5~ w'" t;w gEi~~ ,.a. ..0 c.~t3~ Iii I- ~tug~ wI;; l"1f 8~~~ "'" tzUl!:1j -;8 wg..- 0- odu. "'-8~ "0 ~D.lLO ~j; ~1=0'" :=3 0" M~ ~cmg Ul::; ~~~~ 0" u; a.~;= 9:;;~ z ::;<:l!.... ::;llo 0 00>'8 fl.::iZ ~ tE~f3\L u.<~ w El El 0 '" W <0 g ~ 5~ci " ~ ~~~ g z ~<g 0 "'''w t)ui 5 wOe: !!iffi u: ~~~ ~m 0 5l<l Ul", ~ "';" !!!5 w".... g i:O< 00 .,::; ~::! .. ~~~ Cl f;l WZ iil ~~~ ~~ " .. I-wl= ;lffi 0 tz:eo za. :lJ "t::1Ji ->- w< oU.w ;r!ffi ~6 o ;{j; "'''' ~~~ ~" ~~ a.<: ~~ a.s :5~a: 6~ ~a. ~a.W <u. 00 !!!'" wuu. UlZ wO >UI" -0 Cla. !fi0'" s~ i'lJ51 zw ..sa. a.!} "'"- ll!oiS Uo !!I 0 <w Ilo-w~ :fi :r0 ~~ Hs ...::; l> .: N Z ..; ., ll! ~ .. ~ ~ , ll! u ~ i'l z => .. >< ~ ~ii'Q)~ e z ~~~:: " ......-u- n U)m<m ... ~~~~ oo~o Uiw <<'1< ~~~~ 0", ~~ "'.....0..... ~~ )( w g .~. 0% . ~=> i <" 1=:1:: Ul ~~ w ~~~ [30 ~. .. "'''' ~~:=J ::;' ~m~:: ~~ wo: 0 ~~ 0: a. a: '_""1_'" 1_' --T-.----.-,-.-- ! I~ O 1iF. !i~ ii~ I!" i1~ 'I~ :I~ j!~ i!:!1 "I il~ il~ :I~ ill! Jlf. III i!~ l!~ iji hij j: .J !i~ !It; Il~ lii ill: i1i ': !Ii~ : 11' ! III I i,l- I 'I~ l :II! l ill I 'H t________________} :!~ 'i :I~ : ~ !I~ . ) II~ , ) Iii: ') r.~ · ) r :tt , ~ ~ It . ~ It ~',,) ~~I . . .' . .' , ,) Iii. ~ -l , i'. Jt :t' ~ 11 ) il,! -.L.-'--'~_L~..1,.o..._."._.!'.....z.:~__'~_t.t.,..................J~.....L...J__'~J._"__Jw II! ~ w t: co I. ! : ~!!. i . 0 o!l -.!- I-hI;! 9 ll;~!} !~Ii !~I f3 ll. II: ~ ~i l:l ~~ II: Ii; ~ ~ 8 8 % 5 ll. h ~G _ ~~ ~~5~ ~a s.~~; ~l ~ag~ ~. ~ !&J . ) .~it E ~ :!~,.,/! =a '" . .j ... g ~i" ~ 2~. ;, 7.q ~ ~B t.:) . Ii ~~il Us:! ~~ 'J;' 59 i · i i 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT 0 FOR COPE RESERVE RPUD . LEGAL DESCRIPTION o.R.11199, PAGE 849 THE !WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUWHWEST 1/4, LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET AND THE WEST 50 FEET OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOU1H, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. i ANq i o .R.! 1200. PAGE 199 THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4, SECTION 8. TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, LESS 50 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE ,FOR RIGHT-OF- WAi COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ' THE OVERALL PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOL~OWS: i COMMENCE AT THE SOUTH QUARTER (1/4) CORNER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANPE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN NORTH 00044'56" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 8. FOR A DISTANCE OF 1357.40 FEET . TO ~HE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE RUN NO~TH 89017'58" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTH WEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 8. FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,281.70 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT- Of-WAY LINE OF COUNTY BARN ROAD A 100 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN I NO~TH 00043'48" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, fOR A DISTANCE Of 645.58 FEETiTO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE OF COPE LANE A 60 fOOT WIDE RIGHT- OF-WAY; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89026'18" EAST. ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 615.70 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00048'22" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTH WEST 1/4 Of SAID SECTION 8 FOR A DIST.f\NCE OF 308.54 fEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89022'08" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE $OUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 8, FOR A DISTANCE OF 665.42 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00044'56" EAST, ALONG THE ~AST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 8, FOR A DISTANCE OF 339.35 FEET TO T~E POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 14.315 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. . i Rev 6 irccpc 5-5-2011 Consent).doc I I I i I I ! Page 5 of 9 AR-I2292. Cope Reserve RPUD Packet Page -2232- . . . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT E FOR COPE RESERVE RPUD LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS 1. From Land Development Code [LDC} Section 6.06.01.0, street System Requirements, and Appendix B, Typical street Sections and Right-of-Way Design Standards, which establishes a 60 foot wide local road [cul-de-sac) cross-section to permit a 50 foot wide local road (cul-de-sac) cross-section. 2. From LDC Section 6.06.01.J, street System Requirements, which limits cul-de- sacs to a maximum length of 1,000 feet to permit a cul-de-sac approximately 1,225 feet in length. Rev 6 (CCPC 5-5-2011 Consent).doc AR-12292. Cope Reserve RPUD Page 6 of 9 Packet Page -2233- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT F FOR COPE RESERVE RPUD . LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission systems shall be constructed throughout the project by the developer. Potable water and sanitary sewer facilities constructed within platted rights-of-way or within dedicated County utility easements shall be conveyed to Collier County, pursuant to the Collier County Land Development Code~ as amended, except as may be provided in this Ordinance. B. The developer shall provide for a minimum 50 foot wide drainage and utility easement adjacent to County Barn Road. This easement shall be recorded prior to SDP or Plat approval. 2. TRANSPORTATION A. The sole point of ingress/egress to the RPUD shall be onto Cope Lane. No access will be provided from County Barn Road. B. The developer, his successors, or assigns agrees to improve Cope Lane, including any turn lanes warranted by this project, from County Barn Rd to the eastern most project boundary that is adjacent to Cope Lane, as part of the first SDP or Plat. The design of the roadway cross-section must include on-street bike lanes and sidewalks, and requires County approval. See exhibits "G 1 and G2" for cross-section. No impact fee credits are available for this roadway improvement. . C. Tne developer, his successors, or assigns agree to accept, attenuate, and store stormwater management along property frontage for Cope Lane improvements associated with this project at no cost to the County. All drainage, access, and maintenance easements necessary to accommodate this developer commitment shall be dedicated/conveyed (at no cost to Collier County) as part of the first SDP or Plat. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL A minimum of 15% of the on-site native vegetation must be retained. 12.8 acres of native vegetation exists requiring preservation of 1.92 acres of native vegetation. 3. PLANNING A homeowner's association or similar entity will be established and will be responsible for maintenance of common elements. . Rev 6 5-5-2011 Consenl).doc Page 7 of 9 AR-12292. Cope Reserve RPUD Packet Page -2234- . ~g ~c..a: 1Il~~ ~"':l:' ~~:l:d U1g:a~ ~~tii; ~8~~ OL&.;:)m "'O~~ ~~ffi5 5"'00 ",l;;5~ 8iS:I:- ..,"'13 ~F!'~~ i e:~F~ ~oou.; o~~g tio~ ,,~:z[!! ~~8~ UJ.....lO-l 138~l3 0: W c... ~ "0 It) . ~ -l W C) c: c=t a. c W z W :5 Z z :s: 0:: ::l 0 t-- >- to ..., t- N Z :) <( 0 C) ~ ~:iC:c/)~ a:WS; O!;io I->..J Cf);>LL W W Z z w:5 :5w i ~-l ~~ ~ (LJ w~ ~~ [iJ ~ ~ t-- t-- ffi ~ - .'N-N-- r UJi r . ~: ., I.:'. ,.... ., 1 ;i :! i! :\ :, " !! " '; " i; " ~ ; ;'1 i :"~ .' 0:: C!lw zZ ~gs XU w~ :J:O:: UW !;;;:c... :;:~ c... o t-- u... 0::0 WI- c...Ul ~L5 ~: !' , .. '. '. W : J z: < 0 ...., ::l ---1 Q. $! "" z: '" lfl... .' 0::: "':I: Q.", ::::> "'0;: 0;' f- ~~ffi ., ~5~ ,. 0 0", J oJ-o W z",on J ~ (f) ~~~ "'We> 0 <:z:z D- ~S~ t-z'io 0 2~t:l 0::: ~::l LJ .-. C D- /:25 ::;) ~!<~ C- w :~I w <'>:zj:e z: ::<0 > of <( 1::[;3 I c: III ,:'1 -1 .... W S ... Cf) .. W W '" Q. c: D- O u C- O .~ w U a. :;1 <( 0 C) .:.1 ~ . ; ., :~ I{:! I' . - Z ;~~\ . i ~4 -, .; t ~ r ~i. ,~.)~! ~. ,. ,j :: ii i . I ! ! :)j !:' - ~ . ~ . '-. ~~ ,; . . 'M'O'~ ,09 . 1 ~; . I irJ ~: :>:' .. . i~..j ~i ."~ t;:} :~! ~~. ;: ! ~! 'j .~: . . , , , , , :" ~ ; i :,', . ,! ,~\ -.::,;. :i :.. a\fOH NH\f8 A!NnOO Packet Page -2235- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. .. i fi S ~ : ii!~~lii I w !3 ~ z Q" a: ~ ~ t;@ ~ ...In ~ -0 ala.. :q~ g: fja.. ~ w S 8 w a.. 0 u ~ .H e~ ;: 0'" <q ~~ ;~- ~ c.,. - ~.:. !f:~ ~~ ~~ ~E: 11 ~~a i;€l ~ t5~~~ g 0:: s:... g H ;;,,, ~ ;:"' s i .z~ ~ ~ ~a ~ 5 C.!:> . " .!ii~ lis "ii"a__ ~~ 'So <:;s w8l- >0::C5 0::<(:::;: W:I:lJ,J ~tn(Jl g: in L5 ~~~ g,~g UcLVl ~ "S v .- - ~ 10"- Vl CD 0::: =:J U !'- W ,~~f :,.~~ ~~ ;,..1' f ,l- ~~~ :1', ",i "" i"" .... <0 'C-.l W:~W ';,j-~ CD...] l- :z L.IJ :::;: W Vl LiS Cl ~~ ~ 0::: &- 0 <0 -l _ WW C'II~Z -0:::5 l- ~~. ,~ ;:Y I .. a. ~ ~.f . t') f~ <'< J, } W iJ a. ~~ .~ .~ :~ ~ '. ..J _ ww N~Z -0::::5 I- ~.- <. " wW .t.;Jt - ~~ 0 -q-- co :~ l') 'It 'j' N. ..J WW N~Z . :;: ~ - :5 l- ;~~ , '~ ~ ~L 'C-.l -' i~~ ! . "'~ CD .:;:< 0::: 01- ~ =:J <0"- I U ..J <(Z (Jl w OW !'- u 0::::::;: 0:: w ~ - Ul W ~LiS a. Cl -:.r 1= w Z ~ 0 ~> i= WI- ~ Z a.z ~ ~~ ::> Ow 0 ...J:::;: U Ulw Vl ~LiS , ~ ~ f~ Packet Page -2236- 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. ::; -~ ...:-- .....'0.'. -..-......_--.. ......";..._....,."......\-~ /'II'" ,,\'" 1_"" I.I\~ 0 I Vl W ...J ~ Vl W 0 ~ Vi ~~ 0 <( 0 ~ 0::: Zei ~ o~... Z i= - ll:i] ell I-- UJ a: x U8~ffi W ::::;: W"-5~ 0 (/) ~:b w w 0:: i5~'" ~ 0 u.. (/)... ~ co ~ ell ~ ~ (/)~...~ ~ CD 9 o g~~ U ::> u.. o ell n:::: ~ ~ ::l ffi 8 ?;:; U ~::l'i ::::;: N > ::J ::J :z W~~~ 0 <( u f CD ~ 0 z: 0<'" u:z~ en l- <( ",0 f!! 01= 'C-.l -1l::m "I 0::: w ... ~ Ws =:J 0....... (.) 08 0::: w U ~ ~ ::::;: 0::: g en I 0 .. llll;:ll i . ~ Q, ~ ~ fIj ~ Q; ~ 8 :z o ~ en Nen Clen 1::0 ~5 :J:w rJ:s W D- o () t! s:i H ,. 0:; <it ~9 ~i i ~~ J~ ~ . HE ~~'E! ~ 1:lI~"''''. :i i>: . ::.. g ~~ .-.04 ~5 ~ bI~ ~ "!:2: ~ ~~ ::.. \:i ~. ~~j _~J5 ~~ :S~ Us . 6/14/2011 Item 17.A. . 20D . Wednesday, ~ay 25, 201.1. · Napl~s .Daily. NeWs ~===~:::.2=~~-~::~s=~tr~~~.~~~;:~-=:~=:-~:;==7==~:-~.~~.=~2=~S:=z=::~':...;..'~: N9T1d OF INTENT.TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE. Notice is her~by ~iven th~t on TUESDAY, June 14, 2111', In the :Boardroom;'..:~id 'Floor. Administration Building. Collier" County Government Center, 3299 East..ra- 'miami"Ttail, Naples, Florida, the Boara of County. CommissionerS'will consider the. enactment of a County . Ordinance. . The meeting will .colJlmence at 9:00 A.M. . The '. title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: ," . . '. .'.'. 'AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 20D441;.THE' COLUEI( .1': ", .7: ,.< :,:. COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,.WHICH.INCl.UDEHHE.COMP.REHENSIVE. :'.'. '';-;';';' ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF..COLLlER COUNTY, .....: - FLORIDA. BY AMENDING THEAP.PROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS; ". .... BY CHANGING 'THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OFTHE HEREIN. DESCRIBED REAL.' " PROPERTY FR,OM THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL '. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT 10 BE . . KNOWN AS THE.COP.E RESERVE RPUD. THE PROJECT PROPOSES A TOTAL OF 43 " . . '~ S.lNGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING UNITS IN SEmlON 8, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,'. RANGE 26 EAST, COLlIER COUNTY FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF +/. 143 ACRES; AND, BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PETITIONPUDZ-2907-AR-12292) '. ,~ . .Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Chirk to the Board and 'are. available for !ns~ection. ~l1inter.ested parties are invitedto a~end;and b~ heard. " ' . . . -' .... :.j.' -. '. ,~ . . . -.... :.., -.... . . ':." :.' . NOTE: All Ej~rsons wfsh.irig to' speak. 01) 'any 'agenda..item l!ll~!it.'regirter with the County administrator prior .to presentation 'of the .agenda item to be, addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on 'any. item.. The selection of all in- dividual to speak on behalfof.;an . organization Of gr.oupis encouraged. .If.recog- l:lize~ by the Chairman, i1.s~okesperson for a group or'organization may'be allott!!d .tomlnutestospe~k.o~.anl~~m; r., >. :!'.. " . ....,.... . . ... .'. "" -.. ", ,.:.... . PerSons wishing' to have written.or graphic matei-ia~ iridudeo in the' Boar'd agenda' packets must submit said material a'minimum of 3 wQe~ prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written 'materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be'submitted to the appropriate County staff a miriimumQf seven.da~ . pr:ior to .the public .hearing_ . .AIl material used, i~. presen~atiqri.s. 'bef()re. ~h.e .Bfila.r.9 . .':,W;llhb~co~.e~~.erm~~rntp'.arto~th~ recor~:;" .....:....... '.:..., :',::.; ;.' ". . ';'. '\:::::J . Any person who 'ilecides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a','record' of the '. pro~eedings P!!rtaining ther~to and. ther!!fore, may .needto ens~re' ~at a verbatiT.!l record of the ,proceedings .I~ made, which. record Jl:!clU9e5 the testImony and .eV1, dence upon which the appeallsbased.... ....;.... ',,;. :., ..' '. . . . . '. ."' ; . '. . . . . : . .: ',: :_". '. ';-.. .' ",7,'_' . If yoiJare a person with a di;~Dility 'wtlOneedS:any:~~toriiinod.atil)':dfi:-qrdi!r;topar:::: .ticlpate. in this 'pro~eding, you are entitled. at no cost to you, to the'provision of certain' assistance. ,Please :contact the Collier. County facilities Management Depart: ment, located' at 3335 'Tamiami.Trail East, Buildin\J W. Napl~.'Flotida.34112,.. (239)252.8380. Assisted Hstening devices for .th~ hearing .i.mpaire~ .are, avail~b[e 'in. the'c;oun~~~m;~:!5~io~ers'.~ffj;f~'" . . . ': ..: . -". . ~..: .;;':t ..~.' I .. ., ; : ..:~_ " t,: ~.'" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS " COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA FRED COYLE, CHAIRMAN DWIGHTE. BRO~K. CLERK '. '..' By; .Martha Vergara, Deputy qerk (SEAL) .., . . . . . ::~",!'" . . '~::;;;<'::'. . .'" . . '.'. ':::".-' Mav 25 2011 No19!12315 .. . Packet Page -2237-