The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 04/12/2011 Item #17A 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Dcvelopment Code, which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district to allow for devclopment of up to 135,000 square feet of commercial development and/or a retirement community/group housing at a FAR of .60 and/or a hotel/motel of an intensity of 26 units per acre for a 23.33+/- acre parcel to be known as the Addie's Corner MPUD located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and by providing an effective date. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review staffs findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding this PUD rezone petition; and ensure tbe project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure tbat the community's interests are maintained, CONSIDERATIONS: The petitioner is requesting a rezone from the Rural Agricultural zoning district to the MPUD zoning district to allow development of a maximum of 135.000 square feet of retail or office use on Tract A. a 12.33ic acre tract. The Master Plan provides an 8,85", acre preserve area (Tract B) in the northern portion of the property. which will provide a vegetative buffer for lands to the north. while a landscaped buffer plus an access road will separate the development from the Mirasol property to the west. Access is proposed to be provided on the western side of the property. to generally align with Pebblebrooke Drive on the south side of lmmokalee Road. As depicted on the PUD Master Plan. an eastbound directional left is to be provided into the property including a right-inlright-out. The directional left is depicted for infonnation only and can be modified or closed based upon safety and capacity issues by the county. in accordance with LDC Section 6,06.01,C. The opportunity for shared access has been provided to the Mirasol MPUD to the west, and the Tree Fann MPUD to the east. Reservations for the future right-of-way for the widening of the canal along Immokalee Road are also incorporated into this MPUD, The Master Plan for the proposed amendment depicts generalized areas of development and traffic circulation. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as Packet Page -2464- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities, Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit inelude building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements, Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not ineluded in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMP ACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban Commercial District, Mixed-Use Activity Center Subdistrict (#3), as depicted on the Future Land Use Map of the GMP, The Urban Mixed-Use Activity Center (MUAC) Subdistrict is conceptually designed 10 concentrate almost all new commercial zoning in local ions where Ira/fie impacts can readily be accommodated to avoid slrip and disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to creme focal points 'within the community, and are intended 10 be mixed-use in characler, ...developed at a human scale, ...pedestrian oriented, and ... interconnected with abutting projects ~ whelher residential or commercial. Street, pedeslrian pathway and bike lane interconnections with abutting properties,.. are encouraged Mixed-Use Activity Centers are intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential uses, including commercial development such as this Planned Unit Development. Based upon the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff concludes the proposed commercial uses may be deemed consistent with the Furure Land Use Element (FLUE). (For the detailed report from Comprehensive Planning Staff, see attached GMP consistency memorandum, dated February 3, 2010,) COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: This item was heard by the CCPC at the November 18, 20 I 0 hearing. The petitioner continued the petition to allow time to address issues raised by the CCpe. The petition was heard again on February 17, 2011. By a vote of 9 to 0 that body recommended to forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval. Because staff recommended approval, the CCPC approval recommendation was unanimous, and there were no letters of objection submitted. this petition carl be placed on the Summary Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site specific rezone from a Rural Agricultural Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for a project 10 be known as the Addie's Corner MPUD, The burden falls uponthe applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be Packet Page -2465- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below, Criteria for MPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2, Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations (if this type shall be made only after consultation with the County AI/orney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed MPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan, 4, Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on locarion of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening rcquirements. 5, Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development0 6. Consider: Tbe timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7, Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with MPUD regulations. or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements ofthe Growth Management Plan0 10. Will the proposed MPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? Packet Page -2466- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. ] 1, Would the requested MPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts') 12, Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13, Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary, 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? ] 5, Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible witb surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, ineluding activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem0 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect propelty values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20, Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used 111 accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is tbe change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23, Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use, 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed MPUD rezone on the availability ()f adequate publicfacilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and Packet Page -2467- 4/12/2011 Item 17,A. implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.l06, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the MPUD rezone request tbat the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of tbe public health, safety, and welfare? The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by tbe County Attorney's Oftice. This item has been reviewed for legal sufficiency and is legaJly sufficient for Board action, An affirmative vote of four is necessary for Board approval. (HF AC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request subject to the attached PUD Ordinance. PREPARED BY: Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section, Land Development Services Department, Growth Management Division, Planning and Regulation Attachments: 1) Staff Reports 2) Application 3) Back-up information 4) Ordinance Packet Page -2468- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.A. Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district to allow for development of up to 135,000 square feet of commercial development and/or a retirement community/group housing at a FAR of .60 and/or a hotel/motel of an intensity of 26 units per acre for a 23,33+/- acre parcel to be known as the Addie's Corner MPUD located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and by providing an effective date. Meeting Date: 4/12/2011 Prepared By Name: DeselemKay Title: Planner, Principal, Engineering & Environmental Ser 3/4/2011 11 :05:58 AM Approved By Name: PuigJudy Title: Operations Analyst, CDES Date: 3/17/201] 5:06:35 PM Name: LorenzWilliam Title: Director - CDES Engineering Services. Comprehensive Date: 3/19/2011 11 :58:0] AM Name: BellowsRay Title: Manager - Planning, Comprehensive Planning Packet Page -2469- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. Date: 3/2]/2011 5:39:04 PM Name: FederNortl1an Title: Administrator - Growth Management Div,Transportati Date: 3/22/2011 8:45:00 AM Name: MarcellaJeanne Title: Executive Secretary,Transportation Planning Date: 3/24/2011 9: 11 :25 AM Name: KlatzkowJeff Title: Counry Attorney. Date: 3/30/2011 3:42:00 PM Name: KlatzkowJeff Title: County Attorney, Date: 4/1/2011 8:49:37 AM Name: IsacksonMark Title: Director-Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs.CMO Date: 4/4/201 1 11 :52:37 AM Name: OchsLeo Title: County Manager Date: 4/4/2011 1 :58:46 PM Packet Page -2470- I 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. Co~T County ~ --- SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT FROM: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING SERVICES--LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DMSION--PLANNING & REGULATION TO: HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 17,2011 SUBJECT: PUDZ-2009-AR-I4425; ADDIES CORNER MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) Owner/ Aoolicant: Happy #4 Family Corporation c/o Larry Pomposini 927 N. Highland Avenue Pittsburg, PA 15206 .gents: Robert L. Duane, AICP HoleMontes 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 REOUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a rezone of the subject site from the Rural Agricultural Zoning District to the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District (MPUD) Zoning District to allow development of a maximum of 135,000 square feet of commercial development and/or a retirement community/group housing at aFAR of 0.60 and/or a hoteVmotel at an intensity of 26 units per acre for a project to be known as the Addies Comer MPUD which consists of a 23.33 acre parcel located in the northwestern quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951). The retirement community/group housing may include independent living facilities, assisted living facilities and/or skilled nursing facilities. The retirement community/group housing and hoteVmotel development are not included in the 135,000 square feet of commercial development. Richard D. Y ovanovich, Esquire Coleman, Y ovanovich and Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail N. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 PROJECT STATUS: -'!"be Collier County Planning Commission originally heard this petition on November 18,2010. At that .:acing, the petitioner continued the petition to address concerns raised by the CCPC at that hearing. A Addies Comer MPUD, PUDZ-2OQ9.AR-I4425 February 17, 2011 ccpe Fl...Oo>d: 1/21/11 Page1of3 Packet Page -2471- 4/12/2011/tem 17.A. summary of these issues has been provided in the petitioner's resubmittalletter dated December 6, 2010 (see copy attached). The applicant's agent has also submitted a revised POO document and a revised Master Concept Plan. ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS: Staff's original recommendation was to add the following stipulation: The development within this project shall be limited to i,044 unadjusted two-wtry, PMpeak hour trips (or 708 adjusted two-wtry, PM peak hour trips; correspondent to the highest trip generation scenario of those proposed in the updated traffic study information dated November 6, 2009); allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network The terms 'adjusted' and "unadjusted" shall reference allowances for pass- by and internal capture trip reductions, For purposes of calculation of the weekdtry PM peak hour trip generation for this PUD, the lesser of the weekdtry PM peak hour trips as calculated in the institute of Traffic Engineer's (ITE) Report, titled Trip Generation, 8'h Edition or the trip generation as calculated in the then current ITE Trip Generation Report shall be utilized. The petitioner has added this stipulation, as shown in Exhibit F. Therefore, the stipulation no longer needs to be included. Analysis of the current documents now indicates that this POO can be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP). ATTACHED INFORMATION: The Staff Report prepared for the November 18, 2010 Planning Commission meeting is attached. A copy of the applicant's December 7, 2010 letter is attached along with the documentation provided by the petitioner showing compliance with the Neighborhood Information Meeting requirements for the meeting scheduled for December 16,2010. Also attached is the current draft Ordinance with the revised PUD document. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): This petitioner has held two Neighborhood Information Meetings. The first NIM was held on December 7,2009, The NIM synopsis was provided in the staff report prepared for the November 18,2010 CCPC, A second NIM was scheduled and duly noticed for December 16, 2010 to address issues raised at the CCPC hearing regarding project intensity and building height. No one from the public attended the second meeting, so no presentation was made. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for this petition on January 24,2011. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PUDZ-2009-AR- 14425 to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval subject to the conditions of approval that have been incorporated in the PUD Ordinance of Adoption. Addies Corner MPUD. PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 February 17. 2011 CCPC Revised: 1121/11 Page 2 of3 Packet Page -2472- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. PREPARED BY: ~ S~/WL KAY ELEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES lid-It I , 'DATE REVIEWED BY: ~fu~ RA NO V. BE OWS, ZO G MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES , - 1.5 - (I DATE Jki.., ~~:J~ LIAM D. {O Z, J ,'P.E., DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES o/.:z..".7..011 DATE \.PPROVED BY: 1-] (~/; Nt CASACANGUIDA, DEP ADMINISTRATOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION DATE Tentatively scheduled for the April 12, 2011 Board of County Commissioners Meeting COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: ~~l~ 2 -( 7 - II DATE Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009.AR-14425 February 17. 2011 ccpe Revised: 1120/11 Page 3 013 Packet Page -2473- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. AGENDA ITEM 9-A Co~r Cou.nty ~ - ---- ~ TO: STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING SERVICES--LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION--PLANNING & REGULA nON HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 18,2010 SUBJECT: PUDZ-2009-AR-14425; ADDlES CORNER COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) PROPERTY OWNER & APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner/Applicant: Happy #4 Family Corporation c/o Larry Pomposini 927 N. Highland Avenue Pittsburg, P A 15206 Agents: Robert 1. Duane, AlCP HoleMontes 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 REQUESTED ACTION: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire Coleman, Y ovanovich and Koester, P .A. 4001 Tamiami Trail N. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 The petitioner is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an application for a rezone from the Rural Agricultural Zoning District to the Commercial Planned Unit Development District (CPUD) Zoning District to allow development of a maximum of 135,000 square feet of retail or office use for a project to be known as the Addies Comer CPUD. For more information, refer to "PurposelDescription ofProject.") GEOGRAPIDC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of 23.33"' acres, is located in the northwestern quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951) in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 November 18, 2010 cepc Revised 10127/10 Page 1 of 16 Packet Page -2474- I' "- !I'o'OlIIOV'BIOlIOlIli <( I'- .. ..- E Q) ::: ..- ..- 0 N ...... N ..- c, ...... :0, '<t g;J ; c' 1 i I . :)llI., ! D."'" . ! z 0 w- t::!< ~ :f:: ",0 0 N N ~ N N C ! :0 CL " :E . ! . & ~ ~ i ! ! .. ~~ (1.Il5 11?) 0ll~^3'YlOlIll3fl1O:l c' :oj 0., . ! nv:lS(U.!ClN / ~ I \ , , . . , ". , . " "'~'i .' g A1NnOJ 33l ! ~ , , "- "0 , , " , -. I ;\ , o-z I .j , 00 II i ! , w- - .~ "....~~, ~i!! ~ ~l b ~ --II . ;- ; -, , z co ! . ii. , ~ll: , !i~! l , 0 1 . , . i~ " II '. " D I - , . .. , ~ I .' <' _m~ ., ~~ 8tj l I! II " w I w ~~ ~ ,- WJ:J ~lIIr ,I IJ '" I .w !!;, ![gl_ .il . , , l ~ iI' l,- , . """C([,! ~- n: ~ ! - ... ~;"'.. ,~ l I --~ l , " I" ! OlI'I~NIf'OO"1 ~; ., ~; ~ ! 01: , i. Il . " 'I i! . I ; a.. <( ~ (9 z z o N "'I N ... ... . '" .. '" o o N N Cl ::J 0., " '. , z! 01 l- I- UJ 0. a.. <( ~ z o f- <( () o ...J ~; III =t== .~. , , T~::"'.' r,L-- ____ --:-1 r:-,-,-,---,-1-'-'~ ,___.__.___:...........:==:-'r":l I,' '. . r---,J-~! t-L. II I '\I~~ll lL---"L.lU\II. (C.......JI h':r' .' I , \' iii I' (. I I \ ';1 ' , ,~ I :,11 ,!IIU ! !'II' l'ch.ljll: I I 1 I \ I I j !, 'II I I I I: III II ,~ '1l.JL,J~11 ~,J ,i'.',1 l.J'J----c1 \',.111/1 · I, l'l . I' ., r" " r" [1 n, ,JL ~~---1.JI~ o.-----JJJ) L I ;i Q< . Ii, I I, ~w !!/I I [=!= = = CUr-=- =~= = =1'l'.I:n'. i; !'f'.,'1 I II ! !." c " \ \,S:=J' = = rJ C;S,:=J CJ' = = CJ !Jj!1 < ,. r- ; ; i~l! .l,il . r ..r '1'11; .-g,o l,I!i I' ~i.!, Il!!'I~ l ' II ( "'""' '1 In o:~ I ' ","% ~_"""""l..-~ ' a'I'" "- c/ ), .. i"' ..-----/ ' ~~ .' \ ~- w I I "\ '., , ~ : I I llJ I ")1/ ~ , " <( / ~i:( -1 // 1/1'-/ I '..:' . . , II:;::::, ~! ., " ' , - 'i' ',',', , .' , , , , , , Jb",-:., . " . '. ,- . ',',','. ~- ' . .. . Jloj ~~ ~;:<; :~Lgtl &g: :.t' ~! " " . , , , I , ~, ' ..... 1 ,: I , , , I , , ~ " I'" I: , , , . , . , , I --n.;;:~~ ''''.Kft. .....J ~;;,' O-z ~'" <g~ sf-i : ~s,< $.. ! ? ('" g~ e" o~ ~, ",' . ~ ;:: z 0~ "" ~.r , . ': .' " ,Co ili ' , " . , '>. " -:' .f-'.,.u'.'.' ')" ~" " 'U' w , " . ',..,,' 'wVL' '. ".. ,', .:". ,.:,".', ,""~' . . . ,. ,.,,' t-..... . . . , .' , " ; '. ' ^ , -y- ~.n;-...~''':' :! 9fttZ'tid'Zt<;;:)!OOBYO (V) lV~.lln::m:l9Y Packet Page -2476- oll') ::J~ o."c> u-- , - ~a::cn ~<t:::: ~ . o en .. Uc>" c> ., Ul ~ ,;: ,~N E "0,,, ,,::J:: <1:0.(1) ~- 4/1~2/2011 Item 17.A. ~ , < ~ ri ~" F' :<....ci _<w F"O !:J!!i; FrF ~!l=~ of" j:"""! <r" ~~; ., ~:~ FO" <N"" ",,,,.,; ~--== , ~ > ~ ~ LoI i I ~ ~ ~ ~~~~I~I ~ ~ ~ ~~""O ~ I? ~ '" ~ ~ ~~ " ~ ~~ .... ~ <:i " .... "'ffi ."'< rn ~'" _ & 'e;ffi " ,g i\ ~::i;!: ~ ~ o~ > 8- ~ ~ ~~ ~I ' ....... it ~I ~~~ ~:>~ ~ g~~ Vi w"''''' ;~~ ~'O~ >"w ! 8~~~ g~ ~"' ! OD" Z ." w :":~"'.' lJ'" W .', ...J"' ,~ <- .- ,Co , ~ ~~ "" 88 FO 5> 00 l:!11' w_ oo << fufu n ~& 00 ;!;! gg z o Z~ iii~ 001, ~ 'j ~ 0.. ~ <s- ..,.0 i., .c::: u ~..: 10;;; Iii . o..! ,,' f >-;1:!:H ~~ cr* <> -J~ ~ '" r --------- :; z <( ....J a. e::: UJ e:::r- UJVl Z<( e:::~ 00 U:l Vla. wU 01 o <(~ r- 53 I >< UJ II : ! f\ \' ~ ; u iI', ! '.. \ I " i \ li\ i r--.-J ~ ,i'I' ! I \ I I II or ~ I t , Iii \, ! i "~I IJ i ' .::~~__-------.<2!g'~':::>) avo~ 33lV ! ! ,i (1: I .::a__-:::- ~.:;.~_---;;-~;.-:..~---_ :>IC?WWI / a ::: " ;" ----------~~-----~-~-.~~j_~_j_J ,. A~:::.:~l~~~~~~__::____ ' :------:- _~::o:;:,====:=~--~=---~ -,-== = r f ' , ---- --- lVNV:I ,;;;.._-==--===.::._______:. -~~- '-", Ii ,/""--- ______ _______ OLYHO:>O:> "NUSlX' --"*..--------===t- <~-;~-------------~~~~------- 1------- FlITDRE RaO'C:A TED <;:OCQHA To-iEf. cA!'IAl ~"u ~ss~~ ~S'ii:.e!. <l<l<l;:e mn i:'egljN ~~j;)!~ ~dilii::; H~;! "Iii . I~!I ~!l ~I ..........,__,...,.....0-__.._.. ,. ., " " <( r-- ...-- E a.> :t:: ...-- ...-- o N -- N ...-- -- <<;t PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting a rezone :from the Rural Agricultural zoning district to the CPUD zoning district to allow development of a maximum of 135,000 square feet of retail or office use on Tract A, a 12.33010 acre tract. The Master Plan provides an 8.85010 acre preserve area (Tract B) in the northern portion of the property, which will provide a vegetative buffer for lands to the north, while a landscaped buffer plus an access road will separate the development :from the Mirasol property to the west. Access is proposed to be provided on the western side of the property, to generally align with Pebblebrooke Drive on the south side of Immokalee Road. As depicted on the PUD Master Plan, an eastbound directional left is to be provided into the property including a right-inlright-out. The directional left is depicted for information only and can be modified or closed based upon safety and capacity issues by the county. The opportunity for shared access has been provided to the Mirasol MPUD to the west, and the Tree Farm MPUD to the east. Reservations for the future right-of-way for the widening of the canal along Immokalee Road are also incorporated into this CPUD. The Master Plan for the proposed amendment depicts generalized areas of development and traffic circulation. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: A 20010 acre, undeveloped Agriculturally zoned tract East: The Tree Farm MPUD, an undeveloped mixed used project approved at a density of9.85 dwelling units per acre, and with a 175,000 square footage commercial space allocation with a zoning designation ofMPUD. Maximum building height is 77 feet (Ordinance # 07-54). South: Immokalee Road, then a preserve area bordered by commercial uses to the east and residential uses to the west-all within the Richland PUD (Ordinance #02-07) which allows 35- foot high residential strnctUres and commercial strnctures up to 50 feet high West: Undeveloped land within the Mirasol PUD, a project that was approved for 799 units on 1,543010 acres (Ordinance #09-21). Maximum zoned height of multi-family residential structures and clubhouse/recreation buildings cannot exceed 50 feet or five stories high (actual height cannot exceed 75 feet); other structures are limited to an actual height of 45 feet MIf~~.SOL " ~ << ~ UJ ~ " " o " '< " '" '" ::> ADDIE'S CO::tN8 (P) Excerpt from PUD Map (orange coloring depict commercial areas) Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 November 18, 2010 ccpe Revised 10/27/1 0 Page2of16 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban Commercial District, Mixed-Use Activity Center Subdistrict (#3), as depicted on the Future Land Use Map of the GMP. The Urban Mixed-Use Activity Center (MUAC) Subdistrict is conceptually designed to concentrate almost all new commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to create focal points within the community, and are intended to be mixed-use in character, ...developed at a human scale, ...pedestrian oriented, and... interconnected with abutting projects - whether residential or commercial. Street, pedestrian pathway and bike lane interconnections with abutting properties... are encouraged Mixed-Use Activity Centers are intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential uses, including commercial development such as this Planned Unit Development. One hundred thirty-five thousand (135,000) square feet of commercial development are proposed on 23.33 acres, inclusive of the acreage reserved for future right-of-way. Eligible land uses within the Mixed Use Activity Center include the full array of commercial uses, residential uses, institutional uses, and hoteVmotel uses at a density consistent with the Land Development Code. Based upon the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff concludes the proposed commercial uses may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). (For the detailed report from Comprehensive Planning Staff, see attached GMP consistency memorandum, dated February 3, 20 I 0.) Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 November 18, 2010 cepc Revised 10127/10 Page 3 of 16 Packet Page .2478- <( r-- .,- E Q) ...... .,- .,- o N -- N .,- -- '<t Transportation Element: Transportation Division Planning staff bas reviewed the PUD Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) included in the application back-up material and the PUD documents to ensure the PUD documents contain the appropriate language to address this project's potential traffic impacts, and to offer a recommeudation regarding GMP Transportation Element Policy 5.1. Those policies require the review of all rezone requests with consideration of their impact on the overall transportation system, and specifically note that the County should not approve any request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS) within the five-year planning period unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved. Immokalee Road Impacts: The first concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 43.2, Immokalee Road between Logan Boulevard and CR-951. The project generates 156 PM peak hour, peak direction trips on this 1ink, which represents a significant 4.30% impact on Immokalee Road. lbisconcurrency link reflects a remaining capacity of 1,658 trips in the adopted 2009 AUIRand is at Level of Service "B". The project does not cause failure of the link over the 5 year planning tenn. The second concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 43.1, Immokalee Road between 1-75 and Logan Boulevard. The project generates 121 PM peak hour, peak direction trips on this 1ink, which represents a significant 3.18% impact on Immokalee Road. This concurrency link reflects a remaining capacity of 1,325 trips in the DRAFT 2010 AUIR and is at Level of Service "B". The project does not cause failure of the link over the 5 year planning term. (The 2010 AUIR was used for this analysis as directed to staffbecause of the 'opening' of the 2009 restricted capacity resulting from the completion of the I-75/Immokalee interchange improvements.) CR-951 Impacts: The next concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 30.1, CR- 951 from Immokalee Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road. The project generates 104 PM peak hour, peak direction trips on this link, which represents a significant 4.24% impact on CR-951. This concurrency link reflects a remHining capacity of 702 trips in the adopted 2009 AUIR and is at Level of Service "B". The project does not cause failure of the link over the 5 year planning term. LOl!an Boulevard Impacts: The next concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 50, Logan Boulevard from Immokalee Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road. The project generates 35 PM peak hour, peak direction trips on this link, which represents a significant 3.18% impact on Logan. This concurrency link reflects a remaining capacity of 721 trips in the adopted 2009 AUIR and is at Level of Service "C". The project does not cause failure of the link over the 5 year planning term. Subsequent Link Analvsis: The subsequent links of Immokalee Road (Links 42.2, 44), CR-951 (Link 30.2), Logan (Link 48), and Vanderbilt Beach Road (Links 111.2, 112) have been analyzed using the 20/0-2%-3% requirements, and do not indicate significant impacts (over 2% or 3%, respectively, as applicable) beyond the analyzed segments, Addies Comer CPUD. PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 November 18. 2010 CCPC Revised 10127110 Page 4 of 16 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. The petitioner has proposed specific mitigation as required to meet consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP as shown below: 1. Right of Wiry dedication for future canal relocation 2. Construction of a portion of the planned multi-use pathwiry 3. Pre-emptive siting of a fUture bridge connection in a County-specified location consistent with County expansion plans (with accompanying partial canal relocation), saving the County future exposure to bridge relocation. 4, Interconnection(s) creating a reverse-frontage roadway parallel to Immokalee Road 5. Proportionate share towards at-grade improvements at the CR-951/Immokalee Road intersection. Please note that there are multiple development scenarios that could be allowed if this proposed development is approved. To allow flexibility in the implementation. of these potential development scenarios, staff recommends that the following stipulation, which caps the maximum trip generation of this project, must accompany any recommendation of approval: The development within this project shall be limited to 1,044 unadjusted two-way, PM peak hour trips (or 708 adjusted two-way, PM peak hour trips; correspondent to the highest trip generation scenario of those proposed in the updated trcif.fic study information dated November 6, 2009); allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadwiry network. The terms 'adjusted' and "unadjusted" shall reference allowances for pass-by and internal capture trip reductions, For purposes of calculation of the weekday PM peak hour trip generation for this pun. the lesser of the weekday PM peak hour trips as calculated in the Institute of Traffic Engineer's (ITE) Report. titled Trip Generation, 8th Edition or the trip generation as calculated in the then current ITE Trip Generation Report shall be utilized Transportation Planning staff has determined that with the proposed Developer commibnents as mitigation, and with consideration for the proposed trip generation cap stated below, the roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. As such, Transportation Planning Staff recommends that this project be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. The petitioner has not agreed to this stipulation and it has not been incorporated into the PUD document. The petitioner will be discussing his position at the CCPC hearing, but in summary, the petitioner believes there is no LDC or other mandate to require this stipulation and further, the stipulation would hinder project development should a revised ITE be adopted that changes the trip allocation. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental staff has evaluated the application has determined that the proposed PUD document complies with all applicable GMP and LDC provisions regarding conservation, native vegetation preservation and potential listed species impacts. Addies Comer CPUD. PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 November 18.2010 CCPC Revised 10/27110 Page 5 of 16 Packet Page -2480- GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. A finding of consistency with the FLUE and FLUM designations is a portion of the overall finding that is required, and staff believes the petition is consistent with the FLUM and the FLUE as indicated previously in the GMP discussion. The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP Transportation Element if staff's stipulation is included in any approval recommendation, as previously discussed. Environmental staff also recommends that the petition be fOWld consistent with the CCME. Therefore, zoning staff recommends that the petition be fOWld consistent with the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP. <C r-- ..-- ~ ANALYSIS: == ..-- Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria ..-- o upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code ~ (LDC) Subsection 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as ..-- the "POO Findings"), and Subsection 1O.03.05.!, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission -- '<;t Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the bases for their recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support its action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, Wlder the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document to address environmental concerns. There are no outstanding environmental issues. Transoortation Review: Transportation Division staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document and Master Plan for right-of-way and access issues. The PUD document contains the mitigation discussed in the Transportation Element section of this staff report. Commitments made by the petitioner include the following: right-of-way dedication for the Cocohatchee Canal that will include compensatory turn lane right-of-way; provision of roadway interconnections to the properties located to the east and west; coordination of the bridge construction/placement over the canal; construction of a 10-12 foot wide multi-uses pathway; and a proportionate share payment for the improvements to the intersection of CR. 951 and Immokalee Road in amoWlt up to $50,000. Utility Review: This project is located within Collier COWlty Water and Sewer District and is subject to the conditions associated with a Water and Sewer Availability Letter from the Collier COWlty Utilities Division. According to county GIS records, there is an existing 24-inch water main and 12-inch force main on Immokalee Road. Zoning Services Review: The development standards contained in Exhibit B of the PUD indicate a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet will be maintained for principal uses. The PUD document indicates there will be a 25-foot setback from the Immokalee Road Canal right- Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Page 6 of 16 November 18, 2010 ccpe Revised 10127/10 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. of-way, and the eastern project and western external project boundaries. The preserve area separates the development areas for the northern property boundary. The PUD contains a caveat to allow a zero-setback along the Tree Farm MPUD if the two projects are developed under a unified site development plan. The Tree Farm MPUD does not contain a similar provision. As illustrated in the aerial photograph located on page 2 of the staff report, the surrounding zoning discussion of this staff report, and the Master Plan, the site is bounded to the north by Mirasol PUD and agricultura1ly zoned, undeveloped land. To the east is the undeveloped Tree Farm MPUD. To the south is Immokalee Road (CR 846) then the preserve area of the Richland PUD, which is developed as the Pebblebrooke subdivision. To the west is the undeveloped Mirasol PUD. Tree Farm, Richland (commercial area) and Addies Comer all propose the same 100-foot lot width and 10,000 square foot lot area. All three PUDs offer the same 10-foot or half the building height for a separation distance This PUD proposed the same minimum yards, both internal and external, that were approved in the Tree Farm MPUD--25 feet, from the eastern and western boundaries, and the Immokalee Road/Canal Right-of-way. Internal setbacks are also the same- internal driveslright-of-way is 15 feet, rear and side is 10 feet and lakes and preserve areas are both 25 feet. The Richland PUD (commercial area) allows a 25-foot front yard setback, a 0/10 foot side yard setback and a 20-foot rear setback. Internal principal use setbacks are provided in the PUD document. A 15-foot wide internal drive/right-of-way setback would be provided; a 10-foot wide side and rear yard setback would be maintained; a 25-foot wide setback would be provided for lakes and preserves. Retail structures could be constructed to a zoned height of 45 feet or two stories whichever is greater, and an actual height of 65 feet. Office structures could be constructed to a zoned height of 55 feet or four stories whichever is greater, and an actual height of 65 feet. Minimum floor area of principal uses shall be no less than 1,000 square feet. Also allowed would be group care facilities and hotel hotel/motel uses to be constructed at a 0.6 floor area ratio. The PUD document contains a reduction clause for Group Care and Hotel/Motel Uses stating for each acre of Group Housing or fraction thereof developed, 10,914 S.F. of retail area will be reduced on Tract "A." Staff is of the opmlOn that the proposed maximum zoned building height of 55 feet is comparable to the maximum height limits approved for abutting properties which are as follows: Tree Farm MPUD, abutting the subject site on the west, allow buildings with a 77 foot maximum height; Mirasol, abutting the site on the east, would allow actual height of structures to reach 75 feet; and Richland PUD, which is located across Immokalee Road, would allow 35 foot high residential structures and would allow commercial structures up to 50 feet tall. Because the subject site abuts the future relocated Cocohatchee Canal, the 25-foot setback from the Immokalee Road Canal right-of-way is sufficient. To the east, the proposed uses could be commercial or a combination of commercial and residential; to the south any uses within the Richland PUD are already separated by Immokalee Road, thus this project would have little impact upon the residential uses within that project. As noted previously, to the north, uses on this site would be buffered by this project's 8.8010 acre Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Page 7 of 16 November 18, 2010 CCPC Revised 10/27110 Packet Page -2482- <:t: t- ..- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- """ preserve tract, thus there should be slight impact. To the west, however is the Mirasol PUD. That PUD is approved for only residential uses. According to the site plan, however, the project's main roadway is planned to run north to south along the MirasolfAddies Comer shared boundary, thus any negative impact will be lessened. 'The Mirasol site plan recognizes that the land now proposed to be Addies Comer is located within an Activity Center that would allow more intense, i.e., commercial uses adjacent to Mirasol. An interconnection has been provided between the two projects to allow local traffic to more easily move from Mirasol and Addies Comer thus preserving the capacity of Immokalee Road. --. ------'---r'-- ---.-,-----.---.-.---.-.-.-.----, / I ; I / l t I i I I : I I (POSSIBLE Re~ Outline depicts I I FUTURE bou~daries of Addies !\ "1 I I IINTERCONNEC FUTURE ~orner CPUD I'" I , L 1>.~~ ACTlVI1Y ; I , CENTER i / I _:::-ENTRY i ~ - , SIGNAGE ' i (1YP.) i Residential Development areas within Mirasol , ! , i i .."..----_ I I .r-- - ~I Ir.~::::' - Immokalee Road Excerpt from Mirasol RPUD Master Plan FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses and intensity on the subject site, the compatibility analysis included a review of the subject proposal comparing it to surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location. Zoning staff is of the opinion that this project will be compatible with and complementary to, the surrounding land uses. Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the requirements of the LDC. The deviation is listed in PUD Exhibit E. This Deviation seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.H that requires a commercial development that lies contiguous to a residentially zoned district to provide a wall and/or fence that is a minimum of six (6) feet and a maximum of eight (8) feet in height to be located a m;nimum of six (6) feet from the residentially zoned district, to not require a wall within a Type B buffer along the east property line of this CPUD adjacent to the Tree Farm MPUD to the east. As mitigation for the wall, a 6-foot height hedge will be provided in addition to the requirements Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 November 18, 2010 ccpe Revised 10/27/10 Page 8 of 16 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. of a Type B Landscape buffer. (Also, see Exhibit B - Development Standards pertaining to Landscaping). Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation that he does not want to provide a wall in the type B buffer along the east property line because the site is adjacent to the Tree Farm MPUD, a mixed use planned unit development, that allows for both commercial and residential development, with residential uses located in a floor(s) above the commercial development along the east property line. The petitioner states "Placement of a wall within the type B buffer would do nothing to screen the residential uses on a second floor. Furthermore, LDC Section 4.07.02 B.3, addressing design requirements, notes that "in all cases, screening shall at a minimlJ1ll, be designed to protect existing or potential first floor residential occupant window levels.," The Tree Farm MPUD Master Plan does not show stand-alone first level residential units in the area adjacent to Addies Comer. "Therefore, the placement of wall along the east property line would accomplish no bone fide purpose." StIifJ Analysis and Recommendation: This deviation would allow the developer to provide a vegetative buffer rather than th.e required 6-8 foot high walL Based upon the proposed mixed use character proposed in the Tree Farm MPUD, a wall would not seem to provide a buffering edge to residential uses within that project at the Addies Comer property line. Therefore, the deviation seems appropriate. Zoninl! and Land Development Review staff would recommend APPROVAL of this deviation. find;n.,. that. in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3. the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element mav be waived without a detrimental effect on the health. safetv and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 1O.02.l3.B.5.h. the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "iustified as meetin.,. public purposes to a degree at least eauivalent to literal aoplication of such regulations." FINDINGS OF FACT: LDC Subsection 1O.03.05.I.2 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners. ..shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below. [Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold, non-italicized font]: pun Findinl!'S: LDC Subsection 1O.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Addies Comer CPUD. PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 November 18, 2010 ccpe Revised 10/27110 Page 9 of 16 Packet Page -2484- ~ t- or- E Q) :t:: or- 0r- a N -- N or- -- '<t Staff is of the opinion that the proposed uses are compatible with the approved uses in the area and is consistent with the uses allowed in Activity Center #3 of the FLUE. In addition, the commitments made by the applicant provide adequate assurances that the proposed project is suitable with the type and pattern of development in the area. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, whieh were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to obtain platting and/or site development approval Both processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP. A copy of the FLUE constancy review has been attached. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis Section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed development standards and Developer commitments are compatible with the surrounding area. In addition, the project is subject to the architectural standards of the LDC. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development, The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project as noted in the GMP Transportation Element consistency review, if the mitigation proposed by the petitioner and the stipulation requested by Transportation PI..nning staff is included in any approval recommendation. In addition, the project's development mnst comply with an other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 November 18, 2010 CCpe Revised 10/27110 Page 10 of 16 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure such wastewater disposal system and potable water supplies to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. Staff is recommending the adoption of a Transportation Stipulation to ensure that there will be adequate roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed project, based upon the TIS that was reviewed and accepted with this specific application. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The petitioner is seeking one deviation to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06.A). This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff believes the deviation proposed can be supported, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section lO.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the elements may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section lO.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Please refer to tbe Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report for a more extensive examination of the deviations. Rezone Findin2S: LDC Subsection 10.03. 05.l states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and reco=endations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in boldfont): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, & policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Staff is of the opinion that the project as proposed is consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the project to be compatible with neighborhood development and with all other applicable policies ofthe GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern; As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the adjacent existing land use pattern reflects the GMP FLUM Activity Center designation on nearby properties which provides for a mixture of commercial and residential uses. Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Page 11 of 16 November 18, 2010 CCPC Revised 10127110 Packet Page -2486- <( I"- ..- E (]) := ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- ~ 3, The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; The proposed PUD rezone would not create an isolated zoning district because the abutting lands are also zoned PUD. Additionally, the project is required to provide a vehicular interconnection to the adjacent developments. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposedfor change. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed district boundaries are logically drawn since the zoning boundary mirrors the existing property boundary. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek sllch changes and the project's consistency with the GMP. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; Staff is of the opinion that the proposed change, subject to the Development Commitments detailed in Exhibit F for this CPUD and the Transportation Stipulation, is consistent with the COllDty'S land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Therefore, the proposed change should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7, Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time subject to the trip generation cap as proposed by staff to be included in Exhibit F of the CPUD ordinance. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; The proposed change should bot create drainage or surface water problems because the LDC specifically addresses prerequisite development standards that are designed to reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. Additionally, the LDC and GMP have other specific reguIatiollS in place that will ensllre review for drainage on neW developments. 9, Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; If this petition were approved, any.subsequebt development would need to comply with the applicable LDC standards for development or as outlined in the PUD document. This Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Page 12 of 16 November 18, 2010 CCPC Revised 10/27/1 0 4/12/2011 Item 17.A project's property development regulations provide adeqnate setbacks and distances between strnctnres; therefore the project should not significantly rednce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the acijacent area; This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the snbject property. Property vaInation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however zoning by itself mayor may not affect values, since value determination is driven by markct value. There is no guarantee that the project will be marketed in a manner comparable to the surrounding developments. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; Properties to the east and west of this property are zoned PUD but remain undeveloped. Rezoning this property to a similar zoning district seems appropriate. Additionally, the Master Plan for this project inclndes potential traffic interconnections to both the east and west. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12, Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare; The proposed development complies with the Growth Management Plan which is a public policy statement supporting Zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitnte a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; The property already could be developed within the parameters of the existing agricultural zoning; however, the proposed zoning more correctly reflects the intent of development allowed in the GMP. In any case, however, the petitioner is seeking this rezone in compliance with LDC provisions for such action to seek the highest and best use of the land. The petition can be evalnated and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff believes the proposed rezone meets the intent of the PUD district alld further, believes the public interest will be maintained. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County; As noted previously, the proposed rezone boundary follows the existing property ownership boundary. The GMP is a policy statement which has evalnated the scale, density alld intensity of land uses deemed to be acceptable throughout the urban- Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Page 13 of 16 November 18. 2010 cepe Revised 10127110 Packet Page -2488- <( t'- ..- E Q) ..... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- ~ designated areas of Collier County. Staff is of the opinion that the development standards and the developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a particular zoning petition. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP as discussed in other portions of the staff report. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require considerable site alteration and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to aU federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan or platting approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet aU applicable criteria sct forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with aU applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facillties, except as it may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD document. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCe) shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC dnring its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The NIM meeting was duly noticed by the applicant and held on December 7, 2009 at 5:30 p.rn, at the Cornerstone United Methodist Church. Five people from the public signed in as well as the applicant's team (Robert Duane of Hole Montes, Inc, David Wheeler, Rich Yovanovich) Addies Corner CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 November 18, 2010 CCPC Revised 10/27/10 Page 14 of 16 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. County staff in attendance was Kay Deselem. Of the public attendees, a representative from the Naples Pathway Coalition was present. Applicant represented the project as a 23-acre parcel that they are proposing a Commercial use from Agricultural up to 135,000 sq ft of office/retail use and the buildings are to be no higher than 45 ft. A preserve will be in the rear of the property. The project is located in an Activity Center and a six-foot wall will be built next to Mirasol. Access points will be right in and right out as well as a directional left. Shared access with the Tree Farm is possible Concerns expressed by the residents and the consultants responses follow: 1. It was verified that the project is located on the NW comer rather than what had previously been advertised as the NE corner. 2. One attendee questioned the possibility of a nightclub or bar and expressed interest in having one. 3. Residents expressed concern about the pathway and the developer commitments. They want to be sure the pathway is not removed from the proposal. Robert Duane explained that the canal would be relocated and a IO-foot wide pathway would be made, that 1.6 acres will be dedicated to the County and another bridge would be built to the west. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for this petition on October 26, 2010. RECOMMENDATION: Zoning and Land Development Review Services staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval if ;the Transportation Stipulation shown below is added to the PUD document. The development within this project shall be limited to 1,044 unadjusted two-wtry, PM peak hour trips (or 708 adjusted two-way, PM peak hour trips; correspondent to the highest trip generation scenario of those proposed in the updated traffic study information dated November 6, 2009); allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. The terms 'adjusted' and "unadjusted" shall reference allowances for pass-by and internal capture trip reductions. For purposes of calculation of the weekdtry PM peak hour trip generation for this PUD, the lesser of the weekday PM peak hour trips as calculated in the Institute of Traffic Engineer's (ITE) Report, titled Trip Generation, 8'h Edition or the trip generation as calculated in the then current lTE Trip Generation Report shall be utilized. Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 November 18. 2010 CCPC Revised 10127110 Page 15 of 16 Packet Page -2490- <:( t- ..-- E Q) ..... ..-- ..-- o N ....... N ..-- ....... "<t PREPARED BY: Kc:ts fd~ KAY SELEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVIEWED BY: ~Qd- RA YM V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES iJt/A_"~\ v LIAM D. L NZ, JR, .E., DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPROVED BY: GJHh ~ NICK CASAL~PUTY ADMINISTRATOR GROWIH MANAGEMENT DIVISION I D/,j,if 0 I ATE 10' 1.-6 . / 6 DATE 10 - 2.' .. '2.0/D DATE 10 -l..cr- lOID DATE Tentatively scheduled for the February 22, 2011 Board of County Commissioners Meeting COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN DATE Attachments: Comprehensive Planning Staffmemo, dated February 3, 2010 Addies Comer CPUD, PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 November 18, 2010 CCPC Revised 10/22/10 Page 16 of 16 IHM HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS PlANNERS. SlJIVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. 950 Encore W'Y' Naples, Flond. 34110, Phone: 239.254.2000' Fax: 239,254.2099 December 14, 2010 Ray Bellows, Planning Manager Land Development services Department Growth Management Division Planning & Regulation COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 N. ijorseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: PUDZ-AR-14425 ADDIE'S CORNER - MPUD NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION HM: 2006100 Dear Ray: Enclosed herewith, please find the following documents pursuant to the County's NIM requirements and your request: · One (1) (original) executed Affidavit of Compliance (signed by Robert 1. Duane); · One (1) copy of the Property Owner's list; and · One (1) copy of the Neighborhood lnformation Meeting notification letter sent to all Property Owners on Monday, December 6, 2010, Once the NIM has taken place, we will provide you with a copy of the recorded meeting and the remaining post NIM Meeting documentation. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. ~-~ Tobi D. Charbonneau Permitting Coordinator TDC H;\2006\2006100\WP\CPUD Rcz;onc 2009\NIM (DECEMBER 16, 201O)\RB lOl2J4 NIM SUPPORT DOCUMENTAllON.doc Packet Page -2492- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE . hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, as amended, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and or condominium and civic associations whose members may be impacted by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 10 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per attached letters and or property owner's list, which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance ~f~ (Signature of Applicant) Robert L. Duane, AICP, Planning Director State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this 13th day of December. 2010 by Robert L. Duane, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. ~t.!.tmJ;172("L (!I~tJ:1l-tI-IU!tUL, (Signature of Notary Public) Paulette Debus Charbonneau Printed Name of Notary (Notary Seal) GlPAUlElTEDEBUSCIWIIONNEAU . . MY COMMISSION I DO 812S39 " EXPIRES: December 7, 2012 BoncIIdThlUNalllyNllcl.lndlrwllMl H:\2006\2006100\WP\CPUD Rcwne 2009\NIM (DECEMBER 16, 2C Packet Page -2493- '11M 101213.doc Donald A & Jodi A Bennett 8479 Hollow Brook Circle Naples, Florida 34119 Peter Di Lillo Trust 128 N. 24"' Avenue Melrose Park, Illinois 60160-3032 Timothy G. Hains Trust Tree Farm Land Trust 1395 Panther Lane, Ste 300 Naples, Florida 34109-7875 Michael & Natalie E. Marsalli 8483 Hollow Brook Circle Naples, Florida 34119-9724 Pebblebrooke Lakes Master Association, Inc. 8610 Pebblebrooke Drive Naples, Florida 34119-9715 Namik & Vjolica Tabaku 81 Burnt Pine Drive Naples, Florida 34119-9759 Walgreen Company Attn: Law Department 200 Wilmot Road Deemeld, Illinois 60015-4620 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY 3299 Tamiami Trail Eas~ 3'" Floor Naples, Florida 341 12-5746 Jess W. Dinesen 60 Burnt Pine Drive Naples, Florida 34119-9759 Omar Hakim & Stephanie Mahoney 75 Burnt Pine Drive Naples, Florida 34119-9759 Gary M & Keny M Martell 79 Burne Pine Drive Naples, Florida 34119-9759 Patricia A. Schultheis 129010"' Avenue North Naples, Florida 34102-5428 Tinwood-Pebblebrooke LLC I Independent Drive, Ste, 114 Jacksonville, Florida 32202-5005 Roberto & Maria Zabala 67 Burnt Pine Drive Naples, Florida 34119-9759 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. Jack J. Crifasi ill 77 Burnt Pine Drive Naples, Florida 34119-9759 Pedro M & Erin K Garcia 71 Burnt Pine Drive Naples, Florida 34119-9759 IM Collier Joint Venture c/o Robert G. Claussen P.O, Box 10489 Naples, Florida 34101-0489 McDonald's Corporation c/o Michael Lee Adams 10235"' Avenue North Naples, Florida 34102-5818 David Stedman 74 Burnt Pine Drive Naples, Florida 34119-9757 Barry G Trice 76 Burnt Pine Drive Naples, Florida 34119-9757 Larry Pomposini HAPPy #4 FAMILY CORPORATION 927 North Highland Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15206 H:\2006\2006100IWP\CPUD Rezone 2009\NIM (DECEMBER 16, 2010)IPROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS LABELS 101202.doc Packet Page -2494- HM HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS PLAHNERS SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. .- 950 Encore Way. Nap~s, Flonda 34110. Phone: 239,254.2000' Fax: 239.254.2099 December 6, 2010 RE: ADDIE'S CORNER NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING THURSDAY, DECEMBER 16,2010 HM PROJECT NO.: #2006100 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that this firm has submitted a formal application to Collier County requesting a rezone from the Rural Agricultural Zoning District to the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development District (MPUD) Zoning District to allow development of a maximum of 135,000 square feet of commercial development and/or a retirement community/group housing at a FAR of 0.60 and/or a hoteVmotel at an intensity of 26 units per acre for a project to be known as the Addies Comer MPUD which consists of a 23.33 acre parcel located in the northwestern quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951). The retirement community/group housing may include independent living facilities, assisted living facilities and/or skilled nursing facilities. The retirement community/group housing and hoteVmotel development are not included in the 135,000 square feet of commercial development. In order to provide you with an opportunity to become fully aware of our intention to the described property as indicated above, and to give you an opportunity to influence the form of development, we are holding a Neie:hborhood Information Meetine: on Thursdav, December 16, 2010 at 5:30 P.M. at the St. Monica's Episcopal Church, located at 7070 ImmokaIee Road, Naples, Florida. For your convenience, a property location map is attached. At this meeting every effort will be made to illustrate the proposed request. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comment s, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail to: Ray Bellows, Planning Manager, Land Development Services Department, Growth Management Division, Planning & Regulation, 2800 North Horseshoe prive, Naples, Florida 34104. Telephone: (239) 252-2463/Fax: (239) 252-6710. ' Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. . ~.j ,v'-tWi Robert L. Duane, AlCP Planning Director (Representing Addie's Corner) RLD:tdc Enclosures H:\2006\2006100IWPICPUD .."'~ 2009\N1M (DECEMBER 16, P k P 2495 'LE'ITER ADDlES CORNER lot206.d", ac et age - - 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. , PARKLANDS 7 ~_ , . " " a (?,5 ) I QUAIL CREEK 18 " 16 ~ 14 '" :; '1: '" ~ , PROJEC'I QUAIL D LOCA TIOr " - " Z 22 zo 24 "EGEtiC 0l1lE C'/!'REss . I'IU.AGE n tI;~ ~s IMMOKAlLEE ~JIllD ( C.I<. 84, ) L 2b "" Z9 2 25 DCM: POI.,. zr >. D ~ .! .. ii: t ~ .. ~ ., ~ !l " N N " u . " VANDEI<8IL T BEACI-l 1'AD I I "" 36 !l, " Ii " '" " " ~ Y1NEVARDS (951) 6 r \1NEYARDS 5 4 . 2 o ci > ffi ~ I~' o sC! lE, ,'-4llOC' a D ~ " " " " : 8 ! rGihEl~ \ ~ Ri"q.~ ? CEl(Ijll I :I: 1M 1DIII5~'UOII5 ~NEYARDS . " ,RJ ....J ....J o o ISO Encore Way NlIJ!lHt FL. 341 10 Phon.: (23lI) 2N-2000 FIorlcla CertIfJaaIe of AuthortzalIon No.1 772 I i PINE I<IDGEI I<OAD I ADDIE'S CORNER LOCA TION MAP I 0iEClCtDB'l': R.L.D. DRAW BY : JON DA'" ;2IlII PRO.ECT No. 2lIOLl1lCl CAD FU NAME:: w:N1Y EXHIB1' - J1DI llF4 Packet Page -2496- HM HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS Pl.AH~ERS SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. 950 Encore Way' Naples, Florida 34110' Phone: 239,2542000 . Fax: 239,254.2099 December 21,2009 Ray Bellows, Planning Manager COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Land Development Services Department Growth Management Division, Planning & Regulation 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: ADDIE'S CORNER PUD - PUDZ-AR-14425 POST - NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION HM: 2006100 Dear Ray: Enclosed herewith, please find the following "Post" NIM document per Collier County requirements. . One (1 ) (original) copy of the Affidavit of Publication dated December 10, 20 I 0; Please note, since there were no attendees that showed up for the meeting, the NIM Meeting Minutes and the Guest Sign-In Log Sheet will not be provided. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. ~. Tobi D. Charbonneau Permitting Coordinator TDC Enclosure H:\2006\2006100\WP\CPUD Rezone 2009\NIM (DECEMBER 16, 2010)\RB 101221 POST NIM SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION.doc Packet Page -2497- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. ""':~2, :i;"-;;~!iti~g~l.\~?8I'~~~I~~~r~tm~j;,'." ";:,~~._;;"":,,,,,: -.",,:..-,:..':,",-';'~_;i.:.:-';':"'-::_:~'_:~:,;;~{',: '.""->:\:":/"1:::.~<", _'" ._:: The public Is invited to a~end a neighborhood meet!.ng held oy ttie Ap~l~~~~ri;p}Bi'>~. by Robert L Duane, AICp, 01 Hole Montes, Inc. and Rich8rd D. Yovano"ich, Esq:, 01 Coleman \ovanOvich&~tter'f.,'\.~~: ,~~J{,,;, "'"C',;;., ""'LL; ~~",., ;rllx'~ J:~-:~~ . '~~U:~~t;.:-;;,;.;,< .',.,,~ .."',. ','.._, "",~,,,,V,"". ", "'~",~~ ,'''', ~'_ '_. ,_ ;:::';',';:::"':""'::'I,.:~!;,1i~~~;"i.:',~:~i~'k~{::'_~'i:,;i~~,',~~ ~" "~'" '~i%tf~~ti~':h~'l:':~: ~:; ., . .~~b!~.f.(o,~; .c9~iJi!#cil . , . .,. , . on the'riOiih 'Side Im- Before the undersigned they serve as the all ;> 1]10!<81~~, ~O$ld;,.app!:"Xl~,elr., t, u1Silction 22, Township 48S;. appeared Kim Pokarnev, who on oath says ~~26~i r ~,;~!g'2~~,~. .,' ..':'."'e' i.c':::'l';fl:l;;:"!iO~'i"," the Accounting Manager o,f the Naples DailY:':'~R". ~,.~:.. newspaper pubhshed at Naples, In Colher.use.Plan.;d' Unit 'ing [)Istrict'to allow development distributed in Collier and Lee counties ofFlo. ,ilXili'miflW1&i'ooo . oI'co ,o'ent'andlo[ a retiremEmt 'com.' ' . . ,,'t':-,",;;', .:'lli"";l"'"'~~'-:' ,;<;.;......;..-.~"'l...!r.."";.~"" , .. .'.'~~~..~._ . .,_,_ ,',.,..:."'........;. attached copy of the adverllSlng, being a ,.. mu~Ity/!l,re~p 1:p~~~g Qt'IJ!\R., '< .;. ,"!'~2! ~_".,_w.,"'".'" ~nlnt,ensityot 26 unils~"et acre for aproJect to be known .as the Add~ .COii1tir: MPUDIWhlch ponSlsls tlI~ .23.33 acre Parcel ~~~~~~~~,~~I~{~~_~J~~~~Je;:Y~~~eh~. denflivlng fKcilitles~asSiStEkt living taclJitiils'alidtoi SIolloo'nursirig facil~Jes. The retirement community/group housing and hoteVmotel developrilllnt are not Incl~~ed in the 135;(JQ0 ~quare was published in said newspaper I time ir leet()1 commercilil development. ' . ";P,,;;;;;,;.';;" - _;'~:~:;;::';:;;...,,',-':: " on December 10,2010 NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Affidavit of Publicati State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee PUBLIC NOTICE in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE :..';.~y, ' :Oi uLf. "!tv ;;>_[::,;" -'~~r:~ i, e"r. A- -j"~:l:,,: !ii- Affiant further savs that the said Naples Daily News j published at NapleS, in said CoIlicc County, Florida. an' newspaper has heretofore been continuously published COlmt)'. Florida: distributed in Collier and Lee coun.ti~ each day and has been entered as second class mail mal office in Naples. in said CoIlier County. Florida. for l year next preceding the first publication of the attac advertisement: and affiant further says that he has neil promised any person. finn or corporation any disc(, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this al publican in the ewspapcr. --'1-..._ <,;, /:,a;.;', ..'11'1;" A\>" .,t,< KAROL E KANGAS 'Business and propertY owners, residents and ,visitors are welcome to attend the presentation t::A:J. ~~ Notary Public. Sl'at. of Florid., and discuss the.'pmk;t with the oWiiilr/develoliSr~iind~coi~cou~' siaff"Yyou" "uriable, :.. It ~M : '~''''tIi~ i,i4-l.'- ,>!~., \""".1"~'1T*",~"'4"","_"''1'~''~~~~._ .t'".- ;~, '3} ,YCOmm,ExPiresJUI29,2013.t9'8tt~nd ismeetfng,bul~a~~questionsorcomrriilnts'tIi8}(cari'De' ect .p~g'r1e, "'~'\'i.I.\~' commi"ion#DD912237~~~:~:~~::M~n~Z -l7~~~?:r~~~:~}'..,",>,~. ~':~ land ~evelopmel)! Services pep~~"\;. ", ,.,:: ,,'; ~,:;:i ,Pr?"e; (239) ?52~?.4 _".'; i. , . Growth Managemiim Division, Plannlog & Reguiation; t,'< Fax: (239) 252-6710;: ,\:i;;: ,: _ ~7::::~~~~riv.ei' . ,- :~;~_'),,'I'~~~,~~f~I!ITr~:1~f~~;'~10 "", , I ADDIE"S CORNER VIC~ MAP WE VALUE YOUR INPUT. ,,v<.t;;(+,...,,,.;,;;.v Packet Page -2498- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW WWW.COLlIERGOV.NET 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968 ~ PETITION NO (AR) PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER DATE PROCESSED ASSIGNED PLANNER PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 REV: 1 ADDIE'S CORNER CPUD PROJECT: 2006090031 Date: 4/27/09 DUE: 5/25/09 Ir::::':':~x,',," ", ".' .. ,- .~.:~~, ."::.'.':.::"i.t;'" :';'"'.~.""':.'.~"~. ,... ,', '.'. "'.':'t' ~..."/-".. "f"'.'<'~" '.~-"': '.~~.'-: '.""""'" "'~:", :.r-.,.,!,"", -' ,-~ ,'."'~ ~".".~'" ,. .-:" :,: '.::'APP LTC.t\N'.l"m",ORMATION,' . ,_.- .'.," , ' '" ,_, ,',':" "_-~....'" c.,'" '~:_' .....__.. -," . ,.;."' , .. '.,' .'-" _, '"," _ " t"" .' .- ~ ~~:{'I_ :,:i:;,':, -~':'r;' l- i """.".,c. .---.::,.-"--.,, NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) HAPPY #4 FAMILY CORPORATION, LARRY POMPOSINI ADDRESS 927N. HIGHLAND AVENUE CITY PITTSBURGH STATE PA ZIP 15206 TELEPHONE # 412-665- 0359 CELL # E-MAIL ADDRESS: FAX # 412-661-5408 NAME OF AGENT ROBERT L. DUANE, AICP & RICHARD D. YOV ANOVICH, ESQ. ADDRESS 950 ENCORE WAY & 4001 TAMIAMI TRAIL N., STE. 300 CITY NAPLES STATE FL ZIP TELEPHONE # 254-200 & 435-3535 CELL # FAX # 254-2099 E-MAIL ADDRESS:BOBDUANE@HMENG.COM&RYOVANOVICH@GCJLAW.COM BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULA nONS. Packet Page -2499- ~ ~ o N -- N ~ -- '<t .i'.....,.,..~;.~"- C-.. 'J'::''' C.,'-;....-.;..:."..-.,";.''',-'' -.,-,.,-.,.;; ::.:,~;_.;':.:,iy':",:.:-,,},'~_:.";';~;:;..i',~ ,:::"L~;.'; ;;:',~, ,;..'::.>:... ,;~~'~.!~c;:.~::~",~~~L{;;,~i;~~t~~.lt~~f~4~~Q~liItg~'S.;~~i:~~:ii~.~;>c:~~,~~:ii;~.~~;i;;~:%:~;~i~~~~t~~~~~"i. Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at httD:/Iwww.collierQov.neUlndex.asDx?paqe=774 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: IBIS COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION MAILING ADDRESS R & P PROPERTY, 265 AIRPORT ROAD SOUTH CITY NAPLES STATE FL ZIP 34104 <( r-..: .,- NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: LAUREL LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION E OJ ..... MAILING ADDRESS 8267 LAUREL LAKES WAY CITY NAPLES STATE FL ZIP 34119 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: PEBBLEBROOKE LAKE MASTER ASSOCIATION MAILING ADDRESS 8610 PEBBLE BROOKE DRIVE CITY NAPLES STATE FL ZIP 34119 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. 1:fiiii.,:r:~!.~i!~~~;ii,~~~,';\~l;~;~;~t;;;;i~~tqmft;;Q11jfl~i~i;JifrP~~@ii~i~,i,l:ii,;~\~t,~~~4ii~~lli a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address % of Ownership Happy #4 Familv Corooration Larrv Pomposini, President/Director 34% Daria Yeoman, Vice PresidenlDirector 33% Gilbert Pomoosini, Vice President/Director 33% c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address % of Ownership Packet Page -2501- h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. ,~tt"7Jc~~~s;s'f.:>}}}~~-: '-.-~ '~~,~f.ifl~~:;F.:(i':~'~~~i:;i~JifiI~'-';1.:li({,:Si~.:i'?;<?"'nun.':fi=E'7fi-;~~':~+; .~,..,.:,~c~/,~--:~:.~t~-~-"-- :,.>C:"'~ff!.~;'I.'E.~;:~;:fi,e~:~.,,;;'~.t:;;~'~3~4~';,t";i_!':f.::t1!l~.~tB~:~~'!;~ "...',;f.i.'''......,....,"''''~~. .....,1i)1tf..;..--.,i~...1fiI'"Afi.,,,,;-~,.~"',.,,'-,/,--..:rh'-~~.'~c,..",;.,.Li;~-1;;1..F;. iJ:(i:., .. ." '_-'- . -- w - .."~'t.+'I.::::!.,'''''"'......","t-,j;\.,,''''.....,,,,'i::,''''',i:'"..~~~~&.,.'::-::,~nJ~;!,"::'~'. ~~".' .';. _-:;:'>5. _"""""_""","h' ". .. '........V,. .':"1."_'_"'~'" ..: __,,"IT-,-, -c' '..,-. ..... ...._',.-. ,.,".'.'- '", ',". ._" _,~'_'._ ..,"'-.. __.' ,- ,,' ...... ".... '" _._ .0-......, .' !:\_ ...,...", _" . '.." '-'i..., ":. ,....,~1._.._ ,',,~"'~_~#'."" ,."....-,...,,,:"::;l!"':,<,,,,,. '. ,~:~. Detailed Jel!aJ description of the property covered bv the application: (If spoce is inadequate, attach on separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal description for property involved in eoch district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scole) if required to do so ot the pre- application meeting. <( r-- .,- E Q) ..... NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. .,- ..- o N -- N ..- -- '<t Section/Township/Range 22 / 48S / 26E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book 3746 Page #: 2212; 2211 ;2214 Property 1.0. #: 00188200007,00188360002,00190040802 Metes & Bounds Description: See attached legal description Size ofpropertv: +/-1234 ft. X +/-824 ft. = Total Sq. Ft. 1,016,816 Acres 23.33 Address/l!enerallocation of subject property: N side of lmmokalee Rd" approx, 500' W of CR951 PUD District (LDC 2.03.06): 0 Residential 0 Community Facilities ~ Commercial 0 Industrial I".;":?'~ ;;,1"':';:~" ~.; ,...AD. J A'C.EN T"z'oi&n.Tn 'A" '''''''r..,...ir.:.U.SE;..' : <:'.: .: ".':.:.... :..j;",.,I.iI(,!\lJ..l'U.7.:'~~_J,{-i':. :.:_,: . ",,'- "j ::;:-.--_:,>....:, '.',"".-.. Zoning I Lond Use N A Vacant S PUD Commercial & Residential E CPUD Vacant; future commercial & residential W PUD Residential (Miraso/) Does the owner of the subiect property own property contiguous to the subject property? If so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on seporate poge). Section/Township/Range / / Lot: Plat Book Block: Subdivision: Page #: Property 1.0. #: Metes & Bounds Description: 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. :(;w:t~Ii~.l.1i.1i4~1:~~~~,j~~~'1; THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW WjCOVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION. "';i1~;j);R,1~\~nr~~~\~~~~~~~~i;;;~;;!~~~~wi;~j?il~;~il'.~,{t~~ 1)l~'~~~:!f{-rl~~M~~~ ~~$';~m~f~' 1 Additional set if located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelo menl Area) Copies of detailed description of why amendment is necessary Com'pleted Application with list of Permitted Uses; Development Standards Tobie; list of proposed deviations from the LDC (if any); Ust of Developer Commitments and Statement of Compliance narrative (download a plication from website for current form) Pre-op lication meetin notes PUD Conce ruol Moster Site Pion 24" x 36" and One 8 '/2" x 11 n co Revised Conee tuol Moster Site Pion 2.4" x 36"ond One 8 V2" x 11" co Originol PUD document/ordinonce ond Moster Pion 24" x 36" - ONLY IF AMENDING THE PUD Revised PUD 0 Jicotion with chon es crossed thru & underlined 24 Revised PUD 0 lication w amended Title po e word #'s, LDC lO.02.13.A.2 24 Justification/Rationale for the Deviations (must be on 0 separate sheet within tne 24 o plication moterial; please DO NOT include it in the PUD documents) 24 24 24 24 24 24 Deeds/legal's & Survey (if boundary of original PUD is amended) 2 list identifying Owner & 011 parties of corporation 2 Owner/Affidavit signed & notorized 2: Covenant of Unified Control 2 Completed Addressing checklist 2 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and digitolj electronic copy of EIS or exemption justification 4 Historical Surveyor waiver request 4 Utility ProvisioRS Statement w /sketches 4 Architectural rendering of proposed structures 4 Survey, signed & sealed 4 Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) or waiver (with applicable fees) 7 Recent Aerial Photograph (with habitat creas defined) min scaled 1"-400' 5 Electronic copy of 011 documents in Word format and plans (CORam or Diskette) 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 If locoted in RFMU (Rural Frinae Mixed Use) Receivina land Areas Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. locovera, State of Florida Division of Forestry @ 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire ~e~"'.LDC Section 2.03.08.A.2.o.(b)i.c. Applico~t/ Agent Signature Dote Packet Page -2503- ~ [gJ o [gJ 0 [gJ 0 0 [gJ 0 [gJ 0 [gJ 0 [gJ [gJ 0 [gJ 0 [gJ 0 [gJ 0 [gJ [gJ 0 [gJ 0 [gJ 0 [gJ 0 0 [gJ [gJ 0 [gJ 0 [gJ 0 [gJ 0 0 0 :;'~i-,?i:~:::~ti:~;;li~~f~i~~~,Jj;~~~;;~_:;~'~iiG;~~\~~tkfi.!i:41(t~[~~~tilJ.I~~it!~fgF1i_~i>.n7~;i~:~i~i~~:\~}~~}1~ifJt*~~~k~i~~\~,;~l~~~~~ <C I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- b. ..-- 0 N -- N ..-- -- '<t a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirely, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address % of Ownershio If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list Ihe officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address % of Ownershio Happy #4 Family Corporation Larrv Pomoosini, PresidenUDirector 34% Daria Yeoman, Vice Presiden/Director 33% Gilbert Pomposini, Vice PresidenUDirector 33% c. If the property is in Ihe name of a TRUSTEE, lisl the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage afinlerest. Name and Address % of Ownership PUDZ-2009-AR_14425 :DDIE'5 CORNER CPUD REV: 1 D ROJECT: 2006090031 ate: 4/27/09 DUE: 5/25/09 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSnll', liST me name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address % of Ownershia . e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired ~ 12/23/04 leased 0 Term of lease yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date Packet Page -2505- <i I"- ...... E Q) ..... ...... ...... o N -- N ...... -- '<t COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersjEmed do hereby swear or affirm that we are tbe fee simple titleholders ando'wllers of recod of property cDmmanly ~own as /-Yd/,/,:v" #" Y ;:d?/v+--(',a>/~ (Streel address and City, Stat< and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hcrcto. The prop<rty described herein is the subject of an application for a planned unit ckvelopment ( PUD) zoning, We hereby designate Robert L Duane, AICP & Richard Yovanovich, Esquire. legal representative thereof, as the legal representatjves of the property and as such, these indivjduals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seekmg the necessary approvals to develop. This authority inc.ludes, but is not limited to, the hiring and auth.orization of agents to assi~1 in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unifit:d control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the foI1owing and \\111 be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: J. The property will be developed and used in confom)ity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the de\'elopment an.d all commhments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning, 2. The legal representative identified berein is responsible for compliance with aU terms, cDnditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the propeny is subsequently sold in whole or in part. unless and until a new or nrnendea covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the .approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit developmern process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code, 4. All temlS and conditions of the planned unit development approval \:\'iJ] be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run ,,,ith the land so as to provide notice to subsequent ovmers that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those tenns and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the tenns, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance, The County will not issue. permits, certitkates, or licenses to occupy or use any pan of the planned unit development and the Count)' may stop ongoing c-onstruction activity until the project is brought inlo compliance with aU tenus, con .riOl~ safeg~ds ~ the planned unit development. 0(.,)0:;;/2. Owner J. <''''r'';/ pO"(f'OS>,u; / Printed Name Printed Name 51' ATE OF FLORIDA) COUNn' OF COLLIER) Swam to (or aff...-meJ) and subscrib~rl before me this "1 fVI day of POIVIP(J':)/I,' HrJ(;/ , , 200'1.. by t:- (). V v't:J who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. ~i1UM.A' !levv<' Notary . bile (Name typed. printed or stilITlpcd) (Scrilll Number, if any) Applic:aJ.jon For Public Hearing For PUDRezone 01/18/07. rev 2/12l08~ re\' 7/] liDS ~i/:':.~~~.\ ~l ~d.."j~~~1 lL~~~~.~"'~ SiEPHAN1E KAROL MY COMMISSION I DO 755816 EXPIRES: March 9, 2012 BondedThruNclllryPublicl/nlllrwltlm 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. AFFIDA VIT WelL LARRY POMPOSD!Il being first duly sworn, depose and say that well am/are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief Well understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owner Wellfurther authorize Robert L. Duane, AICP, and Richard Yovanovich, Esquire to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this Petition. ~- roperty Owner Signature of Property Owner i--O.v'V':) Po Vvly.J,?";:>\.'i1 Typed or Printed Name of Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner The foregoing instrument wa~ a9knowledged before me this "1 1M day of JQ vl V"V<':J 20 D q, by l--o.yV'') PaWlJl.lO~11( who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. State of Florida County of Collier ----\ ~r~ VI.IM~ (Signature of Notary Public - State of Florida) Notary Stamp ':f4-~':"";;'" ,...,..."'" STEPHANlEKAROl ~""i:., ~ ';:t<"'" ~'" ".' ".1 MYCOMMISSIQN'0075S816 1"~;J1!{Tf EXPIRES: MardI 9. 2012 '*.~::f;\~ Bonde1ThrtJNotaI)'PublCUn~ PUDZ-Z009-AR-1442S REV: 1 ADDIE'S CORNER CPUD PROJECT: 2006090031 Date: 4/Z7/09 DUE: S/ZS/09 Packet Page -2507- .::( I"- .,- E OJ ..... .,- .,- o N -- N .,- -- "<t 09/24/200E 13: 12 TEL 92542098 H N LAND DEVELOPMENT V) ~ ~/12/2011 Item /I {t-M/7J /9-/? t 2800 NORTH HO(RSES~od DRWF. NAPLES. FLORIDA 34104 17.A. -~ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDRESSING DEPARTMENT (i) I I -- ADDRESSING CHECKl-IST Plense complete tt,e following '"lei \"a:( to ths Addro~$ing Department ;,t 239-252-5724 or r..,bmil In persOf' \0 the AdClressing Dcp"rlm",,' "lthe above address. Fof.,:!)_.!D,lJ.li!. be ,,!~"esLbl' Addrcssinq l~rs!!.mJ!'LJ:1[ior 10 ore-"P.J.1!;c"tion rne~l(ino, please anow 3 davs for prOC4fs.s.fn~. NOI all items will <>pply 10 ""ery proJoG!. IIcn1. in bold typo are required. Porms older than 6 months will require aoditional reviQw t.nd "pprovall,y the Addressing DepartmGl"11. '. .'~ ~. ~_.... '~..- ~.~.....-~-.~ PETITION TYPE ((;lteek petition typ~ ("'low. complete ~ 5cpClrute Addressing Checltl!ol for ,,~ch Petition Typo) o BL (Blasting Pormit) U BD (Bonl Dock EXIP.nsion) o Carniv:nIlClrclls F',"""il o CU (ConoillemElJ U,<cj o EXP (Excavnllon Permit) U FP (Fin,,1 Plal o lLA (LOI Line Adjustmerlt) U PNC (projec\ N"rn~ Ch"ng") n PPL (PI~ns & PI;')l Review) o PSI' (Preliminary Subdivision PI"I) Cc.l PUD Rezone . U RZ (Standard R,,;cone) DSDP (Site Development Plan) [J SOPA (SDP Amendmcn!) !J SDPI (In.ub.tsntial C11~ngC 10 SOP) o SIP (Silo Impr\)vement Plan) o SIl'l (Insubstanti"l Chong" 10 SIP) U SNK (Street N"rne Cllange) n SNC (Slreel Name Ch",nge - Unpl"ttcd) LJ TDR (Trans lor Of Development Rights) n VA (Varlnne",) o VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) LJ VRSFP (Vegetation R0movnl & Site Fm Pormlt) U OTHER ............~_u._ _~.. __.... 'N .,,-- LE.GAL DESCRIPTION of sl1bJ~CI prop""y or properties (copy of lonylhy description may be Clttaclleo) - ? ~ c...t..Js 2.-<:" I Z. I. "S "f J 0 FOLlO (Proporty ID) NUMBER(s) of ~bove (attach to. or associate willl, 'flgal descriptIon it mora thon one) SECTION 22. TOWNSHIP 48S. RANGE 26E 00190040802,00188360002.00188200007 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applic.ble. if itlrersc!y assigned) NO SITE ADDRESS . LOCATION MAP rnu<1 b', rlllmehed snowing CXJ!lct location elf r>roj"cllsile in rd>llion to "earest public rood rlghl-of-way . SURVEY (copy - n\,eded only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (il applietlble) ADD1~'S CORNER PROPOSED STREET NAMES (/1 applicable) NlA SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for ~xisling projcr;l:;/:;ilc,~ only) SOP 01' AR II P8ge 1 of 2 Packet Page -2509- 09/24/2009 13:12 TEL 92542099 ~ M LAND DEVELOPMENT @003/008 .' ,~ . ADDRESSING CHECKLIST - PAGE TWO PrOjec1 or dcvclopmcnl nGm(:~ propost:~(1 fOf, or already ~ppearing in, condomInIum documents (it oppfil;(-l{IOrl; il1dic~le whe1l1er proposed or eXlst.ng) ADDIE'S CORNER -'~"_.. ~''''--'''---~-- ~..._,~ . Pleas.. Check One: o Checklist is 10 be Fnxt'd hnck [J Personally Picke.d Up ~ ~o,PPL1CANT NAME: ROBERT L. DUANE EPKONE 254-2000 FAX 254-2099 Q) .... .,- Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and Is .,- ~ subject to further review by the Addressing Department. -- N - .,-FOR STAFF USE ONI.Y -- '<;j' Primary Number -- ....~.~.,~~,.~~.~._~~..~~..~.~ ~y - AddreS5 Number :3<159<6 390c:. ~q 4-- G . Addres!; Numb"r Address Nwnl>er Approved by: J:iV\..V1 ~ "'\ (Y\ CS'{. o...-v-, Date: Dq - '2....5 -0<3 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMnTED Page 2 or 2 O:\C11fTenf\A..pplic.:nio:'l ~nrmr.\A~r1rr;!SY;Jn!'7 Chf.:{'.k!i~,r rc-v Jlll'\t,.(jfl.n~ 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. 1I11I1I1I1III1111I This Documrm Pnpancl ar-. Denn1. P. Cre-niD, EBquire "Porter. Wright. Korri. k Arthur L/ 580~ Pelican Bay Bo~evard Suit. 300 ~ ~ NaplllB. FL 3-UOS-2709 \-- PlIruIIDNumbc:r: 00188200007 Gramee#1 TIN; Grunce 112 TIN: INSTIl , 6662059 OR II( 846&3 Pgs 1171 - 1172; (2pg<) RECORDED B2I231E885 81 :41:31 PII CHARLIE GREEN, ClERK OF COURr LEE COUNTY. FLORIDA RECORIIING FEE Ia.5B DEn DOC B.78 DEPUTY CLERK t hiole Warranty Deed This ludeuture, Made this :J. 3~ day of Larry Pampsini, Successor Trustae Dated October 18, 1988. ofthc C~L.l alto-- -~ "'~ ~ Happy #4 Family Corporation, December ,2004 A.D., of the B.J.Pamposini Trust ~ t Cv~L_.l of ~ . a Florida corporation BetweeD , grantor, and whosc addnss is-: 90 Pierce Street, Lehigh Acres of !he County of Lee Stale or Florida , grantee. Witnesseth that Ihc GRANTOR. roc &DC! iD considcn.1ioD of Ibc sum of ------------------------TEN DOLLARS ($10)---------______________ DOUA~, .nd other good aDd vaJuable eonsid=uiotJ to GR.AN1DR m band paid by GR.ANTE:E. the R:CCipt wbcnor is bcrdJy ackoowll:dJM, has: poled, bargained and soW to !be said GRANTEE aZM1 GRANTEE'S heirs, -=ecssors and assigm. fomreJ, 1bc foUowia:z described land, sibil:, Irina and being in thE: County of Collier s~ of Florida 10 wit: The South one-half (1/2)of the West one-half (1/2) of the Southeast ODe quarter (1/4) of the Sou arter (1/4), Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 2 ~ the south 100 feet the-reof previously dedic @: or canal. ~ f way, Collier County, Florida. Folio No. 00188200007 taxes in accordance nue, 713 So.2d 1021 te grantee are all Bt instrument; the centages are identical . erty. This conveyance is ex with !Curo rnc~, v. St (Fla. 2nd 1998), sine of the beneficial inte property is unencumber ~fore and after the tr . ETII: ( ~ PORTER WRIGHT ET AL 5 1 PELICAN JAY BLVD S3vv NAPLES FL 341~~ Z7C~ 46 PG: 2212 11Cll1II1ll iJI th'OlrICllI.IlCO!>>Sof COLLnlC01llTl, II OIlllm05 .t 0I:I5A1l DiIGllT I. nOt!, WII and Ihe gramoJMIWI'~!III)l~1mUI1 the title 10 said laud. aud wiD dcfClXl the: same ap.io$t lawfu] claim,; or aD pasob$ wlIol:moeva-. In Witness Whereof, thE: panlOt }as ben:uD1o set tbr;ir haJId aId Ral tb!: dBy aDd yar first above wnne:n Signed, sealed aDd delivered ill our presence: Larry D. PamposLBi, Successor Trustee of the B.J. Pomposini Trust, dated October 18, 1988 and Happy #4 Family Corporation, a Florida~ration ~!N~: ~-'-DCROtItN By, Lan~~osi: - Witn... Successor Trustee ~, " P.o.^""=,..PluaS.......""".."""FLnm Printed N~~ ~~~~"\..,BY: Witness P.O. Add=: Bern ooe.,70 18.50 .10 (Seal) (S",1) STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF loD CpWQ<.. The r~gojng instnamcnl was- acknowledged Won: m: 1his Larry D. Pomposini on behalf of D23/L<i d.y of sa.id trust December 12004 by who"........Iy........_~....prod~"'1W Florida driver' B license ('}'f""/')= o~y-~~ ~~~~ ~- ~ U: ~" Printed Name: os.. P. CRONIN !1 ~~""'IISR ~. Cl DDD1ttn Notary Public ~o- oQ.' M'rCO\lt,llSSlONEXF'l1'lES . .IJ......t./;);;J.. ~ "\ 'f'- ^''',~''' Packet Page -2511-""" 'T~ , 0 vt1~ PClG'OS4 LuerCicnonlcolbye__,~,..-_............ '-"I'~:>"" .......,FLWIl-1 i Warranty Deed .Pag. 2 *** OR: 3746 PG: 2213 *t* PJlTullDNumber. 00188200007 The subject property is vacant land and does not represent the homestead of the grantor who resides at 90 Pierce Street, Lehigh Acres, Florida 33972. <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t ......,~...o~.s.............. :nxn .....~,""',..... ._"'......., 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. 1111111111'11111'1 TbB [)oanMDt Prcpa~ By: . DenDi_ P. erDD.i.Jl" :s.qu1.re porter. "rigbt, Korri.. . Arthur 5801 p.lican Bey Bou1evard Sui.t. 300 Naple.. YL 3~10S-2709 =/ IHSTR . 66620611 OR BK fl.I6B3 P, 1173; IIp,) REl:URDED BVZ3/288:i ,81:41:31 Ptl CHARLIE GREaI CLERt: Of LEE CIlUHTY, FlORIDA' CDWlT RECORDING FEE lB. Be DEEJ DOC e.78 DEPUTY ClERK t h". r:=!~ .,...-...."" - _.. -;:.. -~- ~e~ -- -~- --- --~ =5..... - - - - hr-celIDNwnMr. 001.88360002 , grantor, md ::: ~ :4: gi : :;::-~ --"" ~, _....~. .... =- c::. : :0 ........: .._~. WitDesseth thattheGRANTOR..foraadiIlcOfISidentioDoflheswnof i?J ~ 00: ________________________TEN DOLLARS ($10)----------------------- DOUA~. ~ C>' .nd otbc:r aood .nd valuable eonAdcnDOD to GRANTOR in barHI paid by GRANTEE. me receipt wbenlor u. berc:by acknowledged, ba :5 ~ :::0 : gnmed. baTptned IJId $Old to the Aid GRANTEE IDI! QRANTEE'S heirs.,. SQl;:CCSSOd aDd. lISSips r~. 1Ix foDowilIl described land, situate, == g .. . ~andbeingmlhcc.ounryof Collier State of Florida to wit: ~ = ~ t The Bast one-ha1f 11/2) of the Bast one-half 11/2) of the Bast ::::;:. :;:; one-half (1/2) of the Southwest one-quarter (1/4) of the Southeast g ~ --~ one-quarter (1/4) of Section ' 48 South, Range 26 East, -.... E Q Collier County, Florida. -1. ~ U)!.;. 5 = .Oo 0" < vl', , - g I'-> o r QI'-> 3-- - -- Warranty Deed TIlis IDdeatllre, Mode Ibis C13^ Lay of December . 2004 J.D,. Betweea Larry D. pamposini, Successor Trustee of the Josephine pompoa.f:ni Trust Dated OCtOber 14, 1988.. or the: rOUJlrr of LEE Happy i. Family Corporation, , SIIl1e or Florida a Florida corporation whose addm:5 is: 90 pierce Street, Lehigh Acres of tht County of Lee Stlte of Florida ,grantee.. This conveyance is ex with !:uro Inc.., v.. St (Fla. 2nd 1998), since all of the beneficial . the property is unencUJl'll:) identical before and afte represent tbe Street, Lehigh If!= . ~ . - ::~ - ~ .. .. .. Polio No. 00188360002 The subject property . homestead of the gran or Acre., F1orida, 33972 taxes in accordance enue, 713 So..2d 1021 ate grantee are also Trust iustrumentl p percentages are e real property. - ~: .nd Ihe grantor docs ~y fully wammt the title to $aid 1Imd, lmtI will defend !he- ~ against lawful claims of all pm.om wbom5oen:r. In Witness Whereof, the granKIt' lw bereuD10 ~ their baDd .JId seal the day and year rim above wrincn. SigD~ sealed. and delivered in our preseace: Larry D. Pomposini, Successor Trustee of the Jose.phine pomposini TrUst dated October 14, 2004 ~ Kappy #4 ~ \. ,^ fl Family Corporation / ~ ," X~ By' ~ --- Printed Name' DENNlSP.CROItIN 1.ar D. ompos:Lni ' Witness Successor Trustee ~~ ~ By. r,0,_'..Pi=St_L<".hA~...FL3"71 p~inted Nams. ~~"llt "-'"~ "h.tness -- (Seal) (SoaJ) r.o. AddrtSC': STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF CfJ4--IIQL Tbe foregoiltl imnmen1 was ad:nowlcdged before me this 013 Ad day of December Larry O. pamposini, Successor Trustee on behalf of said trust ,2004 by who"........ylmow"..~ocbu_"" Florida driver' e lic~eA~- ~,..",y..,,# OfflCIALHOlAFIY~ ~^-- 't-! j It.~~ DEfHsPCAONIN Printed Name t I ~' : c::ow.wrssr;wHUMwt Notary Pub.lic D~I'-C'R~'J ~ ..s DOa122n MyCommi ' <.N ~OF"F\..o""- W'l"a:lMMIs.slONEX!>IRES SSlon......,..res; A"= ~~ ~~:'" POKPOS2 ...,.etlioJllo1s.~1K.. 200] (U3)76l_~~~S f_FLWO-l Packet Page -2513- <( I"- ..- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t , grantor, and::::;; -~ ':;5 ::<.....>: ....... ("..11"1 ~ ~ ...... --oJ: ...... ~ c=>: - - ~~ 00' ::;;= 0Cl>' ~~ - - C> ------------------------TEN DOLLARS ($10}---____________________ DO~.=~~' and other plOd and whlablc: eoaAdenticrn ID GRANTOR jq hIDd paid by GRANlEE,. the nx:eipt wbm-eo{ . baeby d.:Dowkdp, bas c:: = .. p1Inted, bupincd aDd M))d to !be r;aid GRANTEE met ORANTEE'S bein, successors ud usigns forever, !he folloY.iac dcscnDed land, 5itulltc, = S ~ lyingandbeingilltbeCownyor eoJ.lier Stale of Florida 10 wit: ~ ~ :;;: Tbe North one-half (1/2) of the West one-balf (1/2) of the Southea.st ~:::. C7"'t ODe quarter (1/4) of the Southeast one quarter (l/4), Section 22, F~ ~ Township 48 South, Range 26 Eas ing the South 100 feet ~5 ~. thereof previously dedicate t of way, Collier Count.y, a::: ~ Florida. O~ l' !! "-> . o ~ ~~ . . 1I1111I1I11111I111 ),..:; ~=m;~l=:::&squir.' 7'.-.'....;;..'a.....; Porter. Wrigh't, Morri. " A:rth P....... '. . ~ 5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard .~ Suit.. 300 . .... , Hapl.., PL 3i108-2709 IHSTR . 6662058 , - mf Ill( fl.I6B3 Pg. 116' - 1178j (~pg.) RECORDED we312885 81;41:31 PtI " . '. tHiiRLIE GREaI, ClERK IF COURT ,Lf[ ,CIlUHTY. FLORIDA ,'- !lEci>RDIHG FEE lA.58 . DEED DOC 8.78 - *PUTY ClERK thaI. PilrnlIDNumbn-: 001900040802 Warranty Deed This lad.alare, Mad'lhis.;l.Yld day.f DecBJDber . 2004 "'D,. Botw_ Larry D. Pomp.ini, Successor Trustee of the Josephine Pamposin1 Trust Dated October 4, 1988. of !be C.oumy of LEB' Happy #4 Family Corporation, , Slale of Florida a Florida corporation whose addl=s. is: 90 Pierce Street, Lehigh Acres, PL 33g72 of tile City of , Country of , grantee. Witnesseth thaI the GRANTOR, fOT IUId ia conswen.tion oflheRlm of Polio No. This conveyance is ex. with Xure Inc... v. Bt (Fla. 2nd 1998), a~c of the beneficial int C\~perty is unencumber ~b fore and after the t taxes in accordance ue, 713 So.2d 1021 te grantee are all t instrument; the ntages are identical y. and the p-anlor docs hereby fully Winant me title to said 1Ind, and ."m derc:nd lhe same apjnst lawful claims of all pcnorl5 w~. In WitDess Whereof, the gra.nlor has htmmao ~ their haM and 5Ci11 the d.ty and year fint above wrlnm. Signed, sealed RDd delivered in our presence: Larry D. Pomposini, Successor Trustee of the Josephine Pamposini Trust, dated October 4, 1988 and Happy .4 !l F._ily Corporation, ~ FIOridaz;O atio~. ~ By: ~ _ Printed Name: ~'_I1'~ ('"..,... Larry. oain! Witness Successor Trustee ~~( P,O,A""=,.."nu..... ~ By. L.";,," Am.. FL "'" Printed Name:_~._ ~'U . Witness P.O.Add~: ~~'f. STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF t;U cPJ-)./~ The r~ing instNmcnt was acknowledged ber~ me this Larry D. Pomposini on beha1f of .;J3/Lc!...yor said trust Decembe.r ,2004 who is petsOIIallyImownto me or has producc<lhis Florida driver' S liC~8e id~cation. ~RY I>IJ OFRQ.t.t.NOTNn'SEAJ. '--- ~ .' . o 4'(:., DElHSpCIICIJrM ~ . IM'~ ~/Ul1IER Printed Name: :; ~_.~ DOOt2272 Notary Public DO.. r. SneUJN ~ 0 o~ IIY~DPlFIES M r----'_. 1:........_ i'Ft. ,IF'R.2Z.200S y.......UIllll:>S1on........t'..~, 1,.-,.r...-.,"'b:7COSpioy~.bo<.lOO:l(IIiJ)l'J_."'SFomln..WIl_I OKPOSS (S..I) (Soal) .....-... =--_co... ---.... .....--... - _.. -;:... --- ESS -- --- --- --- --- -;;:; - - - - ~ lB! ~= by Wan;anty.Deed -Pag. 2 - - 4/12/2011 Item HA m OR: 3746 PG: 2215 tu PandIDN'lIn~ 001.900040802 The subj ect property is vacarit land and does not repre-sent the homestead of the grantor who resides at 90 Pierce Street, Lehigh Acre., F10rida 3397Z~ ~...........,.Co....,.s,.....k..2Oll3 (J6Jj76l-,"!5""'!'LWD-l Packet Page -2515- <( I"- ..-- E Q) , ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t In I II; [:J ili i!~;1 Q ~;s e~; Iii ~ ...... ....iii; :ll ~;... ~b =: :"l 1!'" wOOl;.. t;I ;~~ ~i" "" ~ , !!,~ ' .~ ~ . , 11 I I' i: i!f.l,m" .' L- h ~r!E:; ~i ., "ii'!'! .- I,," "" '! ." !"" ! il'1f! !;j!~ I f' 'f",qi..h" ..it-oh-t! i'"';i:,; f~~;:~ i !.l.:f'. .l..~.t ~:~;i ~fn! ioiilu ftr.tR ~h;,. ~H~I Eo,;;- ;;t.<"t .t.. l Of ;.~ !~~ !.. rll1 "'p.. hi.; !If ,''- -" -" - '-'' -'.;';"-',~iO.oOT" -"_n_n ~ijl i'l. ': ~ i~ e ~ I al,I, ,; g i; ~ ;i1i! , ' Ii'! I ~ II =li il!: 1. : II; n=" "g i!j! I!'~: ~ . ii' .",,""" ,ll:;g !l:i,' ~jVI~L .li .:;:;_~ !!!ll" ~ ,Ii I g ~ ,: ':, F ',.i', ,;: ,; .' F ; ~~ It :H~;~";;: :" F ~ ~ - -,- - F - -;~, 5~ r"1 I i, .: .,' "I' ;1 , , " :'j~ ' I ' '.,'- ,. !' ! ' , , , I I ~ ,~ .. _'1" ;- I <; ;; I ~~ ,~8 If'; ,c';,,- i ,.'., "" . .~ I' "~ . ,.- "I ,;'. " . ~~r:;: . ~ :: ~.. ~ r fiS!'5; ~r'II~' ,,: '" ." .~', ':1 ;~_'!.; ~ . '1-'1 ..::", ::.. .. .. "I' . .. I"''' .."l .... .. ;;.. ~ I !,"~ i;~ .: L~~~ .PI .. ~ J !i' 'I" ~ ,;u:; , ,I ;, . u,s~ ' , I i )1 i d : : ;'i:;l I; r<lt :. II.::!I i~ ;11: YHI1 . .1 , g, , ~ I'!; I q Iii: V : ~tl I ---^ ;>;;>;jJo~~~_.l.SYa ______________~ ~,--"-"--,--- ~-'''",.~" m 1""lj ~ Illi j. 1'1' -I :! !I.l .. I; j' ~m ii!I,!I!iii;..;f,ilili:I;li:!i!!iji~ !iilj ,!:i!! ! I!, I l:!I,~ :1:1 !-.'-' ' ." ""!/ g,,; , i ~:ih.. ;!l,: ~ !~~R=! .. t 1 ~~l~lIIi'm"'~~Siii ~~ijl; tE ~ I hlil: r! iriiiijiiijiiiijiiijjiij '"I "1 ' Idlm,!II'!'I!lil!II':! , l;j I,ll I.' II ' I . III !! i I ,.1 i~ E .= :..~ ~. ,tS'C\Zl a .6<:.~.oO s ;~ 'Ii , l~ <:l:lIou.:m:.dO U'""""" ~ R~n~>~pi Ill!!'!' l!~ ':: :~ ~Sit ,,~;:li .c_ illl 'l! ,'Ii ~..- ..~ ~ ;.::~ ~S:';i €=~ ~~ h i: ti;: ..~ il~ II! ,S "'I "II il E~ ~s s a I; ; Ii I' , ,j I j, I I HAPPY.. FAMt.Y CORPORATION I'AIICIl!L"~lI'AJlDlMlVJIfWDT'lO .8l!CTDt#.~oaaotml._..E.UT COUJIIiCtll.Nl"t.~ BOUNDARY AHD TOPOGRAPHY MeANLY ENGINEERING '__'__'1___"'------_ M~~~~;;C ...... =: =~':.-~7=.;;=;;;. ~$~-i:"';" -- -. _ --, ,i>-Ji, ..".. ....,-- ""''''-. ----- - --...,. . G.' !l~ . 1;1' 'I" i!1 '" I' -I 0, .1 . .' ;1 'i ~t:::i 00 c:: J)"Dz c::;;2t:; ~"'.I> <~::o M:<>-< >-<'"0 ::t:> nZ 'w ~ 4/12/2011 Item 17A STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST NAME OF APPLlCANT(S) HAPPY #4 FAMILY CORPORATION, LARRY POMPOSINI ADDRESS 927 N. HIGHLAND AVENUE CITY PITTSBURGH STATE PA ZIP 15206 TELEPHONE # 412-665- 0359 CELL # FAX # 412-661-5408 E-MAIL ADDRESS: ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): ~l~~i*~~~~~~Mq~tt4t~.J~~~~~~~~~I~'~i~::~$~J(rP.;Tl~i~~~)::.~':'\:~)~'~~i~~'::.rS\:':'~;:{_~::~~P:i??~.?';_~:::';~t;~"~.~;.0~rh~~;ft*{~. SectionjTownship(Range 22 /48S /26E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat 800k 2746 Page #: 2212; 2211 ;2214 Property I.D. #: 00188200007,00188360002,00190040802 Metes & Bounds Description: See attached legal description "'~".>'.',,'."'.(;~/'r.i~'.'.:!:?ww;Q~;'S"mW~&}jj'i:)rspoSMJ';T!Q3lBE;'PRl)vmED;-":~'~;'. ',">"';)'};~r~r.~; (Check applicable system): ~ COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM V a. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM 0 b. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM 0 PROVIDE NAME c. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT 0 (GPD capacity) d. SEPTIC SYSTEM 0 ~!{~~~~,~~~~~t~~~;f,~~~j{~~~~~~_~~#;;~;~~Ti~~.r~mW't~tI'$g~r~~~ffi~fl~~~~ifp~:ti~~J}t1:a~r4'~;:~~~;;j~~tj~'f-~:~~'~~~~~;~~Jt: a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM PROVIDE NAME d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL) ~ o o o STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS - page 2 PUDZ-2009-AR-1442S REV: 1 ADDIE'S CORNER CPUD PROJECT: 2006090031 Date: 4/27/09 DUE: 5/25/09 Packet Page -2517- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t ;^"",,1""=-':<"""'"''''~~'''-'~'~","~~''''''_.C'!''''~'~''1'.'''~,'''>::c_7'i'-'~~!J''''''f''<''';c!:''''':!'il il\~lE~lV1.JiQ._~m1~~.imQ: up to 135,000 s.f.a. retail/office/restaurant ",', , .~ ,,, ,', "'.c ""'''>'.,". ",,_.,.," '='"''='_ljI''''''' E"A. [tAMER' 'GE"Ill: 'flilY? IW" " p"~~",;!L,,, ."._.~._"i_,~,.,"~d?iLl\; J:!,1~ A. WATER.PEAK 66,000 GPO AVERAGE DAilY 94,000 GPO B. SEWER-PEAK 66,000 GPO AVERAGE DAilY 85,000 GPO IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED the date is undetermined due to market conditions. N~j~~ilYlWsJ~I~M~jIlt: Provide 0 brief ond concise narrative statement and schemotic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well os 0 specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved sholl be provided from tests prepared and certified by 0 professional engineer. totLIER>CPlJ,n'y :!J1;ltrfYD~ptCA:rI()NSTATEMENT: If the project is locoted within the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement sholl be provided agreeing to dedicat.;' to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time. This statement sholl also include an agreement that the applicable system development chorges ond connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an ogreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water ond sewer systems. ~;- ""-': -"v;'-"" "~, c~. }"_',""'" ':~'--""~~~'7!1'.~"'':;;. ".h:'''m,~.:,;' :~y, '::-"": .,,~ '"'~,'" ''''.''_'_;~:' :e._. .0,' ~_,_" Jl- ""; ':",'-"~";:~_" .,,,. :,~'~ _:"''''''''\'::' . ":"-;'_" ;._,:,1: SJ~J~ME;NT' <QJ;f;AYAiL~~J.!~ILY>'J;~~!l:~~Im;,titR91'li4:~T~Rj}fRIi>MIP.E;I\?ii;'Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or polable water services from any provider other than the County, 0 statement from that provider indicating that there is odequate capacity 10 serve the project shall be provided. - '" '" ~ 8 ~ ~ ~_,O ~ ~ z 4/12/2011 Item 17A --- --- ---------------------- ~....... \.,.~.#i;",.~~20...~~ ~t;.. :!:!:i:ii:":""'::" i,~"::is..~~;~.4:..~("".*.,.t ...~:'~'.-#.;. ...:c..! ..;.f'.~'.:'....::.."'~"'~",!'.;\'''.~~'~ :!~m::.. '.. H "A.:-:-:..-..?:~fl,<~......~.;,\j{"...~~;,ov~~"'1'.::.1.l'.;_ ... I. ..1..0':.... ,Foe: 'I' ~ ..... ,,'f . I.... .'~.. .......... ..... . ~~::.~;;~t ~()~~:;;~~~~~\~...;-;~:~::.~:!: . ~:!"t ~t~~~;:'t..~1~;~(r(:~~~;;;:i-{~ ~~!~: ;:...:,,;{ ',. ~ ~t";~I". ...~~...j..:,..4....,,:...oto..!i;.;:i.~\.".r..~:r:~ ~., .1 :..1" .;.i~+1..-, r t ~~;..~i.i~!'1"!r.....~~~~.,~:i;... ":;~.J;,~t~'!'J'":-~;,:~\...~~,, ~~g~. ~1:.il""ii{~..;. ~'V"U;'... .~"'~. ~;1.:.ot:..:... ..."-<.""....I(.f: 1'.Air!l.:....;1:...:.~4!.:-~;..~ ~.t~.. "':..~" ~......$':..;1. ...:. t _"-::;:.l-tS';) ':r'." ")'1J.~~~:.~;~;{....~:",...1.... ;.;j. fi.} ~:;'i;"'\"I"'},(;'~~~""'''' ;.~l'.~~W'~ ~.~ w~:~,:' I I \t'r~ ;i". I "li.......t:..:,..:..4'if: ,';'::ti,.<oll""':~'~r');"':":h .~,.t'~"'.:""',"j~" ..;.... ....~t;:-, ~::'J:..." .11..:"'-;',::-,.,;. .r;.)'.'~.fI.:'! c; t :h:-:~~4-:!',:-.'J~' ,t,".?; \..c~ ..:.t:.!,,,....'~.~.~L...~t ~(.:~:.:;.'...!;:.'!" ,;.~;1~.t . .;..:J .:~~~.~!:.~..;..~.i~~ I I.......~, 'Sol-tIi .........'1 ..... . '" ~.'''' "'t". t .,.............. ~ .01:' J............{. .~ ~.I~:~r...1.i.~:~~"*-..}"'~tt.. j'.:t Ui ~.:~ ....(\.v~i. "6' t ~..: f' ~.,;... t. ~!.~;<;f...".(~;"'i.!..\t"..illll.~.::: I I f',-{o.::.. ..,-:-...;0... ~;.:..t......~;.......~.........:'\l....."-..(.. ....I.L.''"..('.!....~.N ~.~....:..;>l \:'"... !1'j, .."~:.~l~t~~\~.ln:~. {~....;y..~~~,'~.~~.~.~~~~~~.1~..~i~.~i"t.~. ~~i:t~--:,; .,t~;r~-:;~:..~,~)~~~~~f::. : :,-{~' ..:"'i.:t. t... .~1I~;' ....If.. .r~ ..1, :-:.'. ,it. ~'" ., ......~.. :-~""::. :.o.::"l.~ ~{'.,. .c~~~' .:. ,,:t:'~~.. ~ \\.d.~~, ;~I'f''V'.:',~~......;&.~~ .~t;..~...O":",.;:-ir:~i/.";I\...rj.\ 0:# ."f' ~,:- "1-'. l. !'~~'t~()..~.~f.~~lt,.~.:i";~...~.:~{~'t..;.. ~ ~.. ~ ~.' (:" J.~~~ ~~(~~ ,:'~,;.~~;~ ii' t;c..:;. :!)-~.~.,,=<~\., ;rt'l~~:l..:}~t-!=J:..,;~.:~~r'..:::~l>(.~~rr:~1-:i~~~ ~~~!: ~:r::?:~:i"'~!-1~': .;.. --- " ..:<:. ;;....<~"S:.~.I,.!'..'l-..t'..r" 1"J>""'" .i\.......;..;:....'II..'''''-....l.:t,...".. 7 r" .~. ..~; ....].!" .i..."-J.":~,f...:-; ~ "!"t- ,;';'1../) .;; it' Y:'.i~';,.".. =! ..;.:~..f' ~. :':~'...~';./ ,r:.'<"~~"I4; '~!:{'...."".;.:!"....'i: ...-':,,"'.1 ='~ ~ t';'4:t'::,f'\o:'-f<" ~\-:1I::'" :,;,Z:'..;..!'~ ..... , :~~:1\~~'\:'1~J\;lo"~~.~;:y:~~..\t~~::*}~jti..~l~h." j.f.i:"il ~-;'"r~~'r .,' i,.'::f...,. ....t .... "'r;.,,,'-'t. . ..__.~~.':. '.. '!.'. -;;..... :,. "..., ,d.t .. .:'h .~~." ";t . . ....:~..J.':\..t..v ..t.~.:~:.fl."'ooI".I....h .;;,...f"....;." ~J',.f. -t:: ..,:'=-.,;!.:...."' I .' I (,tC:I.o\"''''.o('-r'~.'' <1(' _1 ....oV j_"'~';: fo v." 01"" -....,l;;....... (. ~~:.: ~::-'...~~ C"...(":{.,or...~.,.,.-.::..l" f.:.'ll".~..,"'.;...".d.".c-.'.'.r:.(I'..~:.c-:: \ I "~"'1...;....... ., ,'"l:.-'-.r!- -" ....";.:_\ ~;'. ",,'...lI..~ ,..... . oe;,r:.:...~ ~ ~', 1t.r.. "" . ......,. ..... ~p-~l..\" .-r, ,^.. ......", \..' ...., :.... .....:,.r ...:t f ,............ .....-, . .~ .\ -- -0',,-... ~.... 'f "v'\"' \:.....y\l.~n. ~ :~l ':;' "ol!.~,"";:~r";: .,;.~,..;..:.;t,;"c~.'c-:~'(.~.1' :;J.........:!'<ij!"": ( I '.:$: *'..\...~ '!o .'\,:.....~...;"7-.""':'1"- f:'''d' ,..x "I."~,,,,,,,,,,,,o:. ,::.':-~ 1'''' ~ }:..:.~...":., ;~~:;~'1:'~ ;...~~~!...... f, ~...'l't" .t..~. .?.. . .,:0..... .,.~. . ..:,' ~'';.~/,-''r':4''''4":--t" ".I}.., '.'. .. t'....t..~. .t.. ~:........\"...,. . o N , <II " . o " (. . (. SITE "" ~ " :!! o l[ E o '"' on '; I I MRASOL I (P.UD.) D D D D D D D D [: CJ CJ CJ 6 '" '"' .; CJ CJ CJ CJ ~ "- < ~ (;; :::I < '" !l! o I I I -- -- -- -..' -- ... -PROPOSED WATER MAIN ...- - .., .., --- -- -- A ~ SCALE; 1- 2000' II \I \1 TREE FARM (MP.UD.) CJ :] I - EXISTING .CANAL R.O.W. PROPOSED FORCE MAIN ,EXISTING 24" WATER MAIN EXISTING R.O.W. __~__ -1._ =_ __ ____ ----~--: -~----~'EDaE-CIFPA'tiii~--- AT CIUARD RM. .- ~-------~ =====~~t.-S :::.::::::.:::::::_:::::::::::::.::::...-- "-EXISTING 12" FORCE MAIN _ ~EXlSTING R.O.W. ;;--=~=-=~======.~===~===--....., /=--=--=--=--=- ~~ II ti '.\ f 1/ . N:~~ En~"'34rn ADDIE'S CORNER Phone: ~9; 25-4-2000 UTILITY Florida CertIficate of ,.. Authorization Pack~t Page -2519- ONNECTIONS ===~ tM u.BISft.IlIIIlS'!IIDIlS CHECKED BY : R.L.D., DRAWN BY : ....u. DAlE : PRQ.ECT No. 2OOll.100 CAD FILE NAME:: ......eLJJ1Il EXi-IIBlT - I1EN 11lF1 <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. JAH-25-2005 14:39 ~E<iO..~ FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Sf ATE Glenda E, Hood Socretary of State DIVISION OF rIISTORrCAL RESOURCES PUDZ-Z009-AR-1442S REV: 1 ADDiE'S CORNER CPUD PROJECT: 2006090031 Date: 4/27/09 DUE: 5/25/09 January 25,2005 Kan Cave: Turrell &. A.ssociates, Int. 3584 Exchange Avenue, Suite B Napl.s, FL 34104 FAX~: 239-64:1-6632 Dear Ms. Cave: in response 10 your inquiry of J.nuOf)' 25, 2005, the Florida Master Sit. Fil, lisl' on' previously ",'ord.d archaeological site and no historical !tanding structures in the followmg parcel: T48S R26E, 5eclion 22, [n interpretins the results of our search. please remember the following points: . Areas which have Dot been completely s'urveyed, 6uch as )'ours, may contain unrecorded archaeological sites or historical structures. . While many of our records relate to bistorically significant properties, tbe entry of an archaeological site or an historical structure on the Florida Master Site File doe. not necessarily mean that tbe structure is significant. . Since va..dalism is common at Florida sites, we ask thot you limit tbe distribution of locatio.. information OD archaeological sites. o As you may know, federal and state laws re,quire formal environmental review for some projects. Record searches by tbe staff of the Florida Master Site File do not constitute sucb a review. If your project falls under these laws, you shOUld contact the Compliance Review Section of tbe Bureau of Historic Preservation at B50-245-6333 or at this address, If you have any furrher questions concerning tile Florida MIlS!er Site File, please contact us as below, ~ Wm, Gerald L Brinkl . Archaeological Data Analyst, Florida Master Site Fi). Division of HfnoricaJ Resourc.es R, A. Gray Building 500 South Bronaugh Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399.0250 Phone 850.245-6440, Fax: 850-245-6439 State SunCom: 205-6440 Em.il: fmsflle@doHratefl,us Web: hlrpJ/www.do$.sloleFus/dh.imsjl 500 S. Bronaugh Stt'e-et . TnJlaha~3eeJ FL 31399-0250 t 11ttp:/jwww,Oberltlg~.c.l)m 0: D~ctDr'~ OWn w AI't"hAtolCtgical RefeArch 0 Hi. ton, P'lflenratio-I\ 0 Hielorieal MU.l1C'lIffil (850) 245-6.300. FAX 2-1$-64.35 {SSC) 245.6444. FAX: 245-6436 [S50) 24$<6333. FAX. 245-6437 (650) U5-6400 . FAX; 24.$.64.33 o Pi11m Beach Regit'nal Offia 051:. AUgullhfl(' Re~nnal OUite Jj Tampa Rtgio:ru.l O!fic~ (561) Zt""'11.14'i5 . FAX: 279~]476 {9041 H25-504.5 . ~ A:X. A?_&;.c;!l~ It' ":0\ '17"1.'l.l;.''\, . r^ v. ,.." ...,.." Packet Page -2521- JAH-25-2i305 14: 39 F.B3 ~ ~ r ~ F; " u " ~ u" ~~ " . ~ e: <( = " ::Z I"- = '. U~ .,.... E Q) == ..-- ..-- B 0 N ~ -- " N u 0 ..-- ~ -- '<t . ~ . .- ; u ~ 0 "- , . ~ . ~ '" ~ .- , c " ~ " " " ~ ~ j;I '" ~ ~ " ;r ~. ., 5 u ~ 15 r " '^ ~ ~ " ~ ~ . " ~ . " > = . . '" '" - w " 00 -0 ~ .. ~ "v ~ ~ " , ~ w " ~ , N ~ co.< , ,," " "" ~ .~ v .' 0 . .- ~ .~ ~ ~ '" 0 . ~ ~ ~ , m . , ... ~ , 0 ;; . " -~ ~ C> . '" ~ ~ " t " = 0 " " x ~ t"0' d 10101 ~ ' .' , ~'.." .~' ........,. t " ,/ 9 " , , f " .' , , , 11 , .." ...._.:"..<l' ,,' i,-<- I \ \ 16 I I + \ , "--, t ~\ "":i>. '~\~ \~\ '>;;. ,"'" . < , ! I , , \ I " ) Ii" III Ili ~3 II II iii e u' 1~ .' t"O'd I I I ! , , i ! I I ~~~ '~<t. 'Ii Ii Ii II II I !I Ii Ii :1 \1 I, I, II jI II 1! " .,-. 10 ", "'" . '" '. '-, , !""'~' , , , , , ., " . -, i'"'" / "1.. ,. '~. '. . :16) " " .' '. , " /' , , . , > .' . . 7u .. , . / / I~"',/"" , , , '- ". , , , , ..Ih.. , \ , \ . : 15 . .. 22 ". " , . '. . , , , , . " ." \ 2~ I ' \ I ? ! t /. \ ~:.. " /'-J ,_ ': ,/ . MI. '"7. /j.. ,. .~,~ - ... c?~~~' , ".',," ';'0._.>7 ~ ~t- ri - _ ... / 1"'(1" . I,..j ~.. ...~. ~: '" ,1.. ~1 '\~ j . <, , ~I h ,:I " .. . n " ~': , k7 " 'I :i.1 " " ~I ::1 " :I[ ~li ]:1 .. " ", I" Iii ::i ,j il, til '\ I} 'I :11 rl" " 1; ~'. @\t r ~. ". ,', It . ;"f~, ,', .. . ~ ." "I'" ": .:-.. ., ....:' ."~ .. ..,' -' .- ~l .' "",. ''''''.. ';c>-.J:' .- ~{'.'.:'\-.:~.. ......- .... ..... ...... -, ,./') \ ' \ ,r' er' '. 14 i.e,.... . )4 ..." ,,'~ '''='' ~~.. ......, "~-~~''''':...... ..",,., ~ ._U'_. i. '=-': " " " . . "'" ') "J~( iN .\ '. I rI'I', 'I J "_i 1 j''.../ (t~ CO J I \ '-, ,,{ ". '.-.- '~- I '--~~/ '\-,- '.' c; ",::TO I L,-,I' " / . "--C--O ' 'II .....~ -.I ' '1" , r~'" J../ "I ,'"V 1_. '..1 ~t I " ,,_.L. L . Packet Page -2523- @ . .",~ ~ ~ ''''\ . .. , . , . . ~ ~ '. . , ., " " . " --:..... ?' .'~;"-+;''''. , , , " . . "1' 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. ,; .' '1.: .....- ""',;. --- ". ~'--j--- -:. .-", .'..... ~ '7':.., ....' -... , '--I -..' ..1'--'" \ i / \".:r :~;~;;~~~\~~~\""\ il I, '). ( " \; 'I : \ .", \'.., -;.-' \ . t, \ >,) . , .,--..-;'1 .& ~.,.~ .::.:~ ...; " ,.----:;:07..--,--" -':~.'_:a::..,.-..-:~ ~~:.:;y '- -;..--=-=~ 25 "'L~ ,",. _. f,[:t-1 .' ~,~_. -._-~ -,- ~'f4 . , " " ~00~-~C:-~~t:[ JAH- 25- 200::- 14: 39 P,[ll FLORIDA 1\1ASTER SITE FILE R. A. Gray Building 500 South BroDough Tanahassee, Flodd. 32399-0250 Office Number (850) 245-6440 (FAX) Nu:mber (B50) 245-6439 ---.._--_._--_.._--~--_._- ------..-.--.-.-..-..-----...,..-.--- -------..---.---.-.--..----..--- ---. <( I"- .,.... E Q) ...... To: (Fax Number) ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t FAX Cover Page - 2.3'1 - GLJ3 - [; 632 Date ..L/_l5/ .28tJ'5 Pages l (including this sbeet) Please deliver these pages to: Name: ~ ~-<e. Company: Sender: Name: Message: d~~ ill caSe OJ a problem veith an)' pOrtlOD of this lJanSmlSSlOn, pi ease call (850) 245-6440 LrDire.ClO:-'.Olfiee (SSG} 14;-5300 . f A..";(~ ?4S-6435 :500 S. Bronough Street" TalJahaS"5f'e, FL 31399~{l2:50 . http;/iwyvw.fIherit~ge...com o Ffu-totir Pte;'t:rv~tion (F,S!:l) 245-6333 ' E"-..X' 24::~' ~ .t\,rrh;u;olO~tAl Rt&C'u:h (5::0) 2i5...f.444 . ~.....X: 2i.5...o.t56 o HJstoric.aJ Mil &r.:tuuli (J.';n\ '.t:;;...t...4n"-,. -:-..v_ ....~ '.;'" 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. (i) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34\04 (239) 403-2400 FAX (239) 643-6968 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW _ WWW.COLLlERGOV.NET PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES ':gf PUD Rezone (PUDZ) o PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDZ-A) o PUD Amendment (PUDA) Date:~ Time: J la.m Firm: Hd <!.;Hon te,5 -'Knb it 1) Mile..... Project Name: AM;f1<:.. COri'\U \ Size of Project Site:~(3 acres Applicant Name: Phone: Owner Name: Phone: Owner Address: City State ZIP Existing PUD Name and Number N/A Assigned Planner KD.AA lJ.t, ~ ,~ \ :p<D(Xls,..:QE \20 k. ("~~\ \ ?ft~ P ~'\~ (QC\V~ onlt1 h~d CY\iI---P\\O #- ;~i2- Cl(a-3 Meeting Attendees: (attach Sign In Sheet) Submittal requirements (see next page checklist): PUDZ-2009-AR-1442S REV: 1 ADDIE'S CORNER CPUD PROJECT: 2006090031 Date: 4/27/09 DUE: 5/25/09 -1- G:ICurrentIPre-Application Forms 2D061PUD Rezone PUD Amendment PUD to PUD Rezone pre-app 7-11-0B,doc Packet Page -2525- PUD REZONE (PUDZ) PUD to PUD REZONE (PUDZ-A) PUD AMENDMENT (PUDA) APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW WjCOVE.. SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION. NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: . . 1 Additional set if located in the BayshorefGateway Triangle Redevelopment Area) Copies of detailed description of why amendment is necessary r.,moleted Application (download from website for current form) <( e-application meeting notes ~ JD Document & Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36" and One 8 1/2" X 11" copy T- !vised Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36"ond One 8 1/2" X 11" copy E riginol PUD document and Moster PIon 24" x 36" 2 ~L Y IF AMENDING THE PUD - 'vised PUD document with chances crossed thru & underlined ::: .vised PUD document ~-/~mended Title page wlord #'s, LDC lO.02.13.A.2 o N N leds/legal's &. :..., '0;;;;1 (if B8\::lRaer',' af 81 il:l:.,....1 PUD :.. ~n BR~& ~ t identifying Owner & all parties of corporation '<t _ ",mer/Affidavit signed & notarized Covenant of Unified Control #OF COPIES " 24 . I, 24 . 24 24 24 24 ,'V .'1 ,. 'oi Completed Addressing checklist CClrnrLo-:::\ \0 ,,,,._1,,,1,-, ~,\\ 10('0 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) * or exemption justification Digital/electronic copy of EIS Historical Surveyor waiver request Utility Provisions Statement /sltettl,G.J. - I, V oJ Architectural rendering of proposed structures Survey, signed & sealed ((\00 MOlt ~^ (" t"\o1(, n1r1\ Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) or waiver (with applicable fees) / \j Copy of Traffic Impact Statement [TIS) on CDROM ,I Aerial photographs (taken within the previous' 2 months min. scaled 1 "-200'L J showing FlUCCS Codes, legend, and proiect boundary \./ Electronic copy of all documents in Word format and plans (CORam or Diskette) Justification/Rationale for the Deviations (must be on a separate sheet within the I application material; DO NOT include it in the PUD documents) " Copies of Offidallnterpretations and/or Zoning Verifications r--J \ (~ Mf.oraahl... II...tuing eJ &EBfJ.C,u;.. ~ttVttIUplllt:IIICuulU..:1 P,...jt:'-'s: f . J [Be "PSEt Tr?,"" ~"Jjt 5~BA'lit el3l'3rI3.~d ';;~137' sf ;Ffid~1 .1'--'lCl~~ I.' QIl~I'..r.n O-ttUJ),.. o Affordable Housing "Expedited" must submit copy of signed - ( Certificate of Agreement. ! n If located in RFMU (Rural Frinae Mixed Use) Receivina land Areas Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. lacavera, State of Florida Division of Forestry @ 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan", lDC Section 2.03.08.A.2.a.[b)i.c. n If located within 112 mile of City of Naoles. send co~y of submittal oackoae to: Robin Singer, Planning Director City of Naples 295 Riverside Circle, Naples, Fl 34102 24 24 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 4 4 4 4 7 3 5 1 24 ;r REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED ./ V V / V ./' -./ ./ V ./ ./ ./ ./ 'X X ./ V ,/ ,/ / 1\/ / V .,/" ../ ./ V V -2- G.\CurrentIPre-Application Forms 20D61PUD Rezone PUD Amendment PUD to PUD Rezone pre-app 7-"-08,doc 4/12/2011/tem 17.A. Fees: Application Fee: r:($1 0,000 (PUD Rezone) + $25 per acre (or froction of thereof) o $8,000 (PUD to PUD) + $25 per ocre (or fraction thereof) 0$6,000 (PUD Amendment) + $25 per acre (or fraction of on acre) ~ ~ ~ $1 50.00 Fire Code Review $2,250.00 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review $500.00 Pre-application fee (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre-app meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre-application meeting will be required. $760.00 Legal Advertising Fee for CCPC meeting $363.00 Legal Advertising Fee for BCC meeting (advertising costs are to be reconciled upon receipt of Invoice from Naples Doily News). ~ $2500.00 Environmental Impact Statement review fee o N/f\ $1000.00 Listed or Protected Species survey review fee (lNiien an EIS is.!lS21.requiredj) Gr"' Property Owner Notification fees. Property Owner Notifications . $1.50 Non-certified; $3.00 Certified return receipt mail (to be paid after receipt of invoice from Dept. of Zoning & Development Review) Attach a Se arate Check for Trans ortation Fees (Refer to Exhibit A): $500.00 Methodology Review Fee# required *Additional Fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting Fee Total $ PLANNER MARK IF NEEDED TO BE ROUTED TO REVIEWERS BELOW: Comments should be forwarded to the Planner rior to the due date V Ie j:l..,~m~ SCHOOL DISTRICT v PARKS & REC SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS v Ci of Na les - Robin Sin er DR/EM1 - EMER. MGMT - Jim Von Rintein IMMOKALEE WATER/SEWER DISTRICT CDES Coordinator I' I.. n. Route Sheet v UTILITIES ENGINEERING - Zamira Deltoro onl Meeting Notes (J,'de '}t)ct+e(etA"ct +\\'\'1 tow~~';' ~\J~ ))W\Il~5 ~ ? lDVt ~ j l-lSh-h ("fA h€M.- ~ c(OS(- ~(',J.,0'1'\<; tQ.S~ lhA1 a.lkt- lIochvQ,s;', USe.. QCcJlp\.e rJ A~V\CLhbY\ 0\'Y\o.t ?$:-pLw~ C'OVlta.Ct::::" -Kp. JJ, -p -Iv . In--Jo wl1.e; :S-{-('(..i.c:fz.uuvj in P.A2~ Il...Ud.. 'to Db ~~~~~t:t. -3- G:ICurrenIIPre-Applicalion Forms 20061PUD Rezone PUD Amendmenl PUD 10 PUD Rezone pre-app 7-11-08,doc Packet Page -2527- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS LDC 10.03.05 F. Applicant must conduct at least one Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) after initial stoff review and comment on the application and before the Public Hearing is scheduled with the Planning Commission. Written notice of the meeting shall be sent to 011 property owners who ore required to receive legal notification from the County pursuant to Section 10.03.05.B.8. Notification shall also be sent to property owners, condominium and civic associations whose members are impacted by the proposed land use change and who hove formally requested the County to be notified. A copy of the list of all parties noticed, and the date, timet and location of the meeting, must be furnished to the Zoning Deportment and the Office of the Board of County Commissioners no less than ten (10) days prior to the scheduled date of the NIM. The applicant must make arrangements for the location of the meetin.g. The location must be reasonably convenient to those property owners who ore required to receive notice and the facilities must be of sufficient size to accommodate expected attendance. The applicant must place on advertisement of the meeting in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices ond classified advertisements appear stating the purpose, location, time of the meeting and legible site location map of the property for which the zoning change is being requested. The display advertisement must be one-fourth page, in type no smaller than 12 point and must be placed within a newspaper of general circulation in the County at least seven (7) days prior to, but no sooner than five (5) days before, the NIM. The Collier County staff planner assigned to the project must attend the NIM and sholl serve as the faciiitator of the meeting; however, the applicant is expected to make a presentation of how it intends to develop the subject property. The applicant is required to audio or video tape the proceedings of the meeting and provide a copy to the Zoning Department. As 0 result of mandated meetings with the public, any commitments mode by the applicant sholl be reduced to writing and mode 0 port of the record of the proceedings provided to the Zoning Deportment. These written commitments will be mode a port of the stoff report of the County's review and approval bodies and mode 0 port of the consideration for inclusion in the conditions of approval. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify nome) at its expense sholl record in the Public Records of Collier County 0 Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and sholl comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice sholl be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. -4- G:ICurrentIPre-Application Forms 20061PUD Rezone PUD Amendment PUD to PUD Rezone pre-app 7-11-08,doc 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. MEETING NOTES *~ytA)~ ~ ctJ. ~ ~ Fd.I1/~. 14AWB-/~ ,N, ~ ~~'WV- "~~ ~ ./J J S.,re- '? t.!Olfr. rJ-ItAJ/JilJ&- T.4c: H 7U1 . ;.uc....,.rpG"' o.?,c:-5/Te- " 5/Csdrr&e- ;:::0'<:" T..eczr-F4~ ""'Ft/p /,0<-7</771""/ cc>AJ7/JJU,f'T/'ZO.0 / ' O~ cJ/.~f-</A-Y .4-~t<-&- --z:/<(//?/CA-t.ELs: ? t'">'4D , ';;/<-r;; 'fc:? ~#"'Gc7/~ :;-uu -r~ _ M ~r"vG . Packet Page -2529- <( I"- .,- E Q) ...... ..-- .,- o N -- "'" N 'oAJ ~.~ 'Z~ Q.l. ~ ~~. == QOO .JIIIIii( -Z e~ '''''''. Z"" -, ~' c..~ <~ .00. Q.l ;.... ~. c '>- 0:A < ,~ b -w -($..., --ci~ .:::r0- 0:: iJ\ w . ~ - ::0 ~ CIl ::iE ~ c :;) 1\1 '" > z \ 0 w ~ z "'"l 0 '^' :I: f'l .:l- 0- '" ~ (Il .:; (Il a::: - C (Il E a.. o ai > (Il a "tl c tl ..... oil tl) c .2 o N .... o - c (Il E - .. tl c.. (Il a en en (Il .. "tl "tl <1: tl E ::E Q) W Q; I Ul Q) o 10 ~ ~ M 0- N I M ~ N I 0- M N a::: w Z Z <1: ..' ..... CIl ll.. ..0 a E w ;) Z Z Cl III C VI 0 VI ~ <1: ll.. - c ";: 0. OJ '" o J! 0. ~ ~ . t -r ," " ? -J " I':J . II> '" II> ~ W ~ 0:: Q ~ Q ~ < ..... v ~ <( '"> ~ t: 0 :E ~ ... I <I w 7 r-.. "" 0 ~ ~ ,J 1- ~r ~ :E ,0:: u: , I ~i~i ...- , ~ ~~ . 11\ Iy"i l '" I ~ ,~~ t9k~. 1!I ;1 <i~ ~--'i 31 ~ I '. (\".' \ ' \ il"'-,~' al 0,1 '0. ~' "'I I -J,:,\ . cJ, ' ~[ I 1 '-1 v C6 i~' +t- ~ ~ I ~8 (J, ~, -~: ~ 'J 11) ::::! ;;:> ,::: S;'- ~. :::l. CI ' I "" (1--1 (j C '~ ~ I! ~ ~ \5 \ ~ o I- 0- W Q '-- iz o in ~ Q >- ,I- ,Z ':;) [0 !U w ::iE < z I ! ~ ~ ) ill LL "\ ,J I, G) "0' e '" ~ 0> ,; !!! N o ;a - co U " "' 'S; !!! u o '0 "0' o <6 N 6 ~ 10 " "" "' ,0:: 0, 'in '0 " "' 'S; ,g; "' "- "- '1' !!! 0- ~ Ii: 4/12/2011 Item 17.A Pre-app RZ - Robert Duane, Agent Kay Dese/em, Planner, CORB Weqnesqay, Odober 29, 200B 11:00 AM-11:4S AM in als-C Requesteq by: Robert Duane o(Hole Montes phone: 254-2000; email: bobduane@hmeng.com Representing: !II Folio #: 00190040B02 Zoning: A. Rural Agricultul'a/ (/ocatecl in Mixeq LJse Activity Centel' #3) [FLLJE pp, 53 - 5B], Location: NOI1:h siqe o( Immoka/ee Ro'lq 'lnq west siqe o(Herit'lge B'ly PLJD/DRI, N'lp/es, DesCl'iption: Rezone From A, Rur'll Agricultur'll, to CPLJD, Commel'ci'll Pl'lnneq Unit Development (project name: Aqqies Comer) (or 120,000 sJ o( ret'lil qevelopment, Propel1:Y consists 0(10-'lCl'e p'lrce/ loc'lteq northwest oFthe intersection o(lmmok'llee Rq, (CR B46) 'lnq [the northern tel'minus 0(1 Collier B/vq, (CR 951), ACI'e'lge lies olf-(ront'lge, 'lbout 660 west o( Broken B'lck Rq, (Col/ier Blvd exfenc/ec/J. 'lnq 'lbout 660 Ft, north o( 'l cqnal P'll''ll/eling Immokqlee Rq, Tree F'lrm MPLJD (:;pprovee/ 2007) isloqteq 'lqi'lcently e'lst 'lnq fi'onts 'lbout one-qu'lrter mile o(Broken B'lck Rq, Interconnection with 'lnq 'lccess through this site likely/necess'liy, Consiqel''ltion m'ly require using the M'lstel' Pl'lnneq PLJD Mixeq LJse Activity Center process; See (pp56-SB); propos'll is insiqe Activity Center bounq'lries; See: One/ex M:;p "p 126); FLLJE I'equires 'lpplic'ltion to proviqe info hom surrounqing two (2) miles o( MVAC I'e: I'lnq use p'ltterns & commel'ci'l!ly zoneq 'lnq useq /'lnq; See (pp5S-S6J; Mirket stUqy shoulq use best 'lV'lil'lble q'lt'l, incorporate v'lc'lncy r'ltes, 'lnq 'lccount (or recentlY-'lpproveq 'lnq current/y-proposeq commerci'll rezones 'lnq GMPAs (Inc!ue/i!)g the "e/I:;cent Tree F:;rm MPUO) CIE Schequle o( C'lpit'll Improvements shows projects 'llong Immok'llee Rq, anq 'lt this intersection with Colliel' B/vq, 'lre schecluleq to be completeq by FY 09, The 2008 ALJIR shows no project 'lctivity in the 5-ye'lr pl'lnning perioq, These segments o( Immok'llee Rq, showecl q g,'e'lterth'ln 20% qecre'lse in Pe'lk Hour Directional Volume fi'om 2007, ,f ,f ,f M VAC criteri'l, especi'l/ly the "('lctOI'S to consiqel'" items "'l" through 'T'; Urb'ln Commerci'll District, Mixeq Use Activity Centel' Subqistrict provisions; Objective 5 'lnq its 'lpplicqb/e policies, esp 5/55,4 (comp'ltibility & complement'liy cl'luse) JD.d. the 'lpp/ic'lb/e "consistent by policy" clauses re(el'enceq 'lbove; Obiective 7 'lnq its 'lpp/ic'lb/e policies 7,1 through 7,4 (Tow'll'q Better Pl'lces - Community Ch'll'acter pl'ln); Aqvisecl to expl'lin GMP with Statement o( Consistency =*< Petitionel' reminded PLJD 'lpp/ication is to address: ,f ,f Packet Page -2531- 09/24/2009 13: 12 TEL 92542038 H M lAND DEVELOPijENT Ii!J 0021006 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDRESSING DEPARTMENT 0" ~w.~ ...~,~ 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 r I ~=:=J ADDRESSING CHECK1-lST Plc<lse compte!", I~le following '"1') fax to the Addre$sing Department "I 239-252-5724 or wbmil In person 10 tile Adc)ressing Dep"rln,,,nl 3\ 11,,, "bovc tlddress, E.'lr.nUIW..t b" sian"'.<Lby Addrcc.c,inq II<.rsonn".lPJ19r 10 pre:app,[ic<l!ion wee(ino, please anQW .3 d~vs for proCGssinq, Not (':ill items wilt I:=lpply JO p.w::ry proJoG!. florns in bO'ld typo i,:lre required. Forms older than 6 months win mquire qdditional revtf:":w Hod apprOVed by tho Addressing Departmont. ~. I"- .,- 'ETITlON TYPE ((;heck petition typ~ 1,,4ow, cDmplete J 5cp;;>r;;>Ic Arldre$sing Checll/i.llor o..ch Petmon Typo) ~ ] BL (Blasting Permit) 0 SOP (Sito Oovelepmenl prom) ==1 BD (Bont Dock Extension) [] SOPA (SOP Amendment) .,- J Carnill;nVClrcu5 P",rmil Cl SOP I (Inn"b~lantial CI'Dngc \0 SDP) OJ CU (CondiliunElI U"c) lJ SIP (Silo Improvement Pion) N I EXP (Exc.8vntioll Panni!) 0 SIPI(lnsubslanti;n1 Chona", 10 SIP) N J FP (Final Plat U SNfo: (Streel N;{(fle Cl1ange) ~ J LLA (Lot line Adjustment) fl SNC (Street Nem€ Ch"nge - Unplatted) '<t J PNC (Project N'lfl1~ Ch"ngfl) Q TOR (Transfer of O~lIelDpment Rights) Il PPl (pt.ns & Pial Review) n VA (Variance) o PSP (Preliminary Subdivlt.ion PI;,t) 0 VRP (Veget;ntlon Removal Permtl) ~ PUD Rezone [J VRSFP (Vegetation Remov"j & Site Fill Pormlt) U RZ (Standard R"mne) U OTHER ..~,-- _4..___........ '-"'_.~ .~, ..... ,,-,-,~IJ.. ~.~ -. .. - -.--,. ..- 2--(.. I Z- I . ~ 'i 1 0 fOLIO (Proporty to) NUMBER(sl of ohove (;,ttach 10, or a-,sodale with, iHgOl descriplion if mora thon onlj>) LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subJeCl property or properties (copy 01 IOflfJlhy description may be :'ttac/leo) - y 0-4" c:..US SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 488. RANGE 26E 00190040802,00188360002,00188200007 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable. il ilJr08riy "ssigned) NO SITE ADDRESS . LOCATION MAP lnu'l h" nllBched sMwlng exaet IOW110" ,)r pmjf;etlsl\e in rd"lion 10 nearest publlo rand righl-olCway . SURVEY (copy. n"cd.,d only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if app/i",,/;/e) ADDIE'S CORNER PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) N/A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER ((or exisling projrxtslsife:s only) SDP or AR II Page 1 of 2 09/24/2008 13:12 TEL 92542099 H M lAND DEVELOPMENT 4/12/2011 Item 17.A ADDRESSING CHECKLIST - PAGE TWO -~- -.-.-------------.... Projec1 or devetopment IIGfl'C5 propos~~(l for, or already ~ppc::aring in, condominium documents {if (lpphW"ltior1; ifldicf4(~ whether proposed or existing) ADDIE'S CORNER _._,,~.. -.... _".~._.~_._ h..._'~. ~ -_._~~ Please Check One: 12] Checklist is to be Faxed haCK o Personally Picked Up APPLICANT NAME: ROBERT L. DUANE PHONE 254-2000 fAX 254-2099 Signature on Addressing Checklist does not consti1ute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Department. FOR sr AFF USE ONI. Y Primary Number :3<iS 9 q; Address Number 39 Dc:.. Address Numbar ~q 4- Co __ ~J >__".~... . ~_""',_ Address Number Approved by: ~I'LVU:"'\ tV'- CS'{... 0.. o'V'\ Date: 0'1 - 7-5 -0"3 Upd<lled by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED P<,ge2orZ o:\c.11trenf\AppliC'..::llicm F=.::vmr.\Ar,lt1~:,IO!1 Ch~kli~1 rev .lllnerin.t:loc Packet Page -2533- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... .,- .,- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t ENVI RONHE:-fJTAI- I. / """.. _ . PUD Rezone & PUD Amendment W ~ ~.13J?1:W4 ~cfJj lYVIW! 6/1LU) i:JtMM~ Jb-e... 0et . D 23. ~3a cAul )1/ acc&idalfck~L-. r l2J Provide a map of all overlays, districts and zoning on the subject site and the surrounding ploperties. (i,e. CON, ST, PUD, RLSA designation. RFMU district, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05- 2.03.08; 4.08.00) 2. Comply with specific requirements per SSA stewardship easement, or SRA development document/master plan. (LDC 10.02.13; 2.03.06; 4.08.06) (J;) Submit a current aerial photograph and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay or vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation. (LDC 10.02.03.B.I.d - e) Q Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Pleserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.A.2). Q Plovide calculations on site plan showin~ the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on-site or mitigated off- site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07B-D; 3.05,07.F; 3.05,07.H.l.d-e). 6. Created and retained pleserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements pel LDC 3.05.07.H.l.e. o Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in WC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off-site preservation areas or wildlife corridors, (LDC 3.05.07.A.4) 8. Provide the justification for proposing a created preserve versus letaining existing native vegetation. (LDC 3.05.07.H.l.e.i) 9. Provide the location, maintenance plan, and type of habitat of any proposed off-site preservation/mitigation. (LDC 3.05.07 .F) @Wetland line shall be approved by SFWMD and delineated on the site plan. Provide wetland permits from the applicable agencies. (LDC 3.05.07,F; 10.02.03,RI.j.) 11. Wetlands within the RFMU District and the Urban Designated Area Lake Trafford/Camp Keais wetland system shall provide an assessment of the value and function of the onsite wetlands (WRAP score). Direct impacts of development shall be directed away from high quality wetlands. (LDC 3.05.07.F.3.a) 12. Wetlands within the RFMU District and the Urban Designated Area Lake Trafford/Camp Keais wetland system being utilized by listed species, serving as wildlife corridors and existing wetland flow ways shall be preserved onsite, even ifby doing so exceeds the required preservation acreage. (LDC 3.05.07.F.3,b-c) 13. Wetland preserves within the RFMU District and the Urban Designated Area Lake Tlafford/Camp Keais wetland system shall have a vegetated (existing or planted) upland buffel located landward from the approved jurisdictional line, (LDC 3.05,07T3.f) (~ (1J .~ , , ~~ ..2, ~ " I , 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. 14. All direct impacts to wetlands within the RFMU District and the Urban Designated Area Lake Trafford/Camp Keais wetland system shall be mitigated. Provide a mitigation assessment (LDC 3.05.07.FA) 15. RLSA Baseline standards for Wetlands outside of FSAs, HSAs, WRAs and the A CSC. Provide a map identifying the wetland assessment scores of each wetland on-site. The preservation requirement shall be met first with wetlands with a score of 0.65 or greater (based on SFWMD methods). Provide agency approved wetland score documentation. (LDC 4.0S.08.H.1.) 16. RLSA Baseline standards for Wetlands outside of FSAs, HSAs, WRAs and the ACSC. Wetlands being utilized by listed species or serving as wildlife corridors shall be preserved onsite. even ifby doing so exceeds the required preservation acreage. (LDC 4.08.0S.H.2.) 17. RLSA Baseline standards for Wetlands outside of FSAs, HSAs, WRAs .and the ACSC. Direct impacts to wetlands, shall be mitigated for. Provide a mitigation assessment. The wetland functional score of the mitigation must equal 01 exceed that of the impacted wetlands. D=onstrate that thele's no net loss of wetland functioilS. Priority shall be given to mitigation within FSAs and HSAs. (LDC 4.08.0S.H.S-9.) ~provide a complete and sufficient EIS (and the review fee) identifying author credentials, V consistency det=ination with the Gl\1Ps. off-site preserves. seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site . contamination. (LDC 10.02.02) rovide a wildlife survey. (LDC 3.04.00) Iovide USFWS and FFWCC agency p=its fOI protected species. (LDC 0.02.G3.B.l.j.viii) 21. Include the wildlife habitat manal?=ent p~ljB- ~ an appendix to th. e PUD Document (eagle. RCW). (LDC 3.04,00) Rer~ 1+ ~ _ --5<l . 22. Golf Course PUD within RFMU or RLSA: Provide an Enviroumental Mastel Plan and NatUral Resource ManagementPlan (NRMP) approved by Audubon International. (LDC 2.()3.08.A.2.a.(3)(a).xi.b; 2.03.08.A.3.a.(I)(k); 4.0S.06.A.3.h; 4.0S.08.F.l) @UD Document and Mastel Plan shall st te the mininlUm acreage Iequired to b~ ~~:~e.:v5 (LDCI0.02.13.A.2):+:nutJ.e .:Dcy\ In Pf)odfJ('U/!~ d d. p~ .fJ/U7v1.aid tJv<1d~h-d. .~ PUD Document shall identify permitted uses within the preserve and wetland buffers. II ,. (LDC 10.02.l3.A.1.e) . ;e5. PUD Document shall provide the following note: "This PUD shall comply "vith the guidelines and reco=endatioris of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) regarding potential impacts to protected species onsite. A Habitat Manag=ent Plan for those protected species shall be submitted to environmental review staff fOI Ieview and approval prior to final Site Plan! Construction Plan apploval." (LDC 10,02.13.A.2.m) pUD Document shall provide t1.o +"~11~...'_~ M+O. "All conservation areas shall be designated as "Preserve" on all Packet Page -.2535- md shall be recorded on the plat with (7) -- <( I"- .,... E, Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -.... N ..-- -- '<t Cl ~ protective covenants pel or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Conservation easements shall be dedicated on the plat to the project's homeownels association or like entity for ownership and maintenance responsibility and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance." (LDC 3.05.07.A.2; LDC 3,05.07R1.d; 6.01.02.C.) ~UD Document shall plovide the following note: "All principal structures shall have a minimum setback of 25' from the boundary of any preserve. Accessory structures and all other site alterations shall have a minimum 10-foot setback." (LDC 3,05.07.H.3; 6.01.02,c.) ~UD Document shall provide the following note: "All Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. nuisance and non-native vegetation, shall be removed from within preserve areas and subsequent annual removal of these plants (in perpetuity) shall be the responsibility of the property owner." (LDC 3.05,07.H.1.g.ii) ~UD Document shall provide the following note: "A Pleserve Area Management Plan shall be plovided to Environmental Review Staff fOI review and approval prior to final plan/construction plan approval identifying methods to address control and treatment of invasive exotic species, fire management, and maintenance of permitted facilities." (LDC 3,05.07.H.l.g) ~UD Document shall provide the following note: "All approved Agency permits shall be submitted priOI to final Site Plan/ Construction Plan approval." (LDC 3.05.07.F; 10,02.03.B.I.j.) 31. Golf Course PUD Document shall provide the following note: "PUD golf course shall be designed, constructed and managed in accordance with the Audubon International's Gold Signature Sanctuary Program." 32. Additional Comments: . 33. Stipulations fOI apploval: (i) r_-' '" . II: .. li: ! I .. ~ f u~ > 0 I .... ~~ "'0 :a 4/12/2011 Item 17A ... > w '" :J;~ ~ I ~ .., UI =- cog ~ ;z: % 9 " ~ ~ ~ 5 W ts... 0 III ..J ~ 0 ~ CI 5' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :s :3 , l[ . fl ~! -I i; gl ,,' ..- n. n; i'l IiI en o -- '" N -- '" " a..n:J......w N"-'" -=tug=> Sa:C'lC . I.IJ 0 en O:::ZIDo -=Fa: 8;:: C'l 0 N N o U .. '" ;;:;nt;" N~~a; 000'- :Joa:l'tS Q.cto..C nl~ - < < I I I I < < < i < - .- -- ! ! < < I ~I ~ I , ~l I I I "'- I ! < __--"~~l , , -r ..... Packet Page -2537- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..- -- '<t NOTE, FOR PLAN LEClEHD AND SPECIAL NOTES SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 L ... ~ ;;; !l on '" !l .. ~ .. Q cl ~ 01 Q I!! :! " o ~ ::! nUlIMA (PUDI c:::i) "'.,.. P1EftM ..."" ...\....L RIG 1- I I I L " . '''' <rJ @ WlTPEVLU... IlII' NaPOIU HI Uf. U.W.NDltAhDl """" 'ruE. POUIBLI furo.. INTtRCOlHECr ~ CQJU:EPTU.u CUll HOUSE -.... UI<IlTlON TRUFAR"" ,PUPI .....ou 11m." IIlnkCOMNlCT HERITAIIE BAt (PUttl . ~ rg . . II"m1 TLI.L RIG COEC'tPRU5 . >> (ruD) . >> - . . . MIRMOL I I'RDnm BOUNDARY : I ~ !Ii ~~ =j j ~ WENT: PROJECT N~ I.M. COLLIER JOINT VENTURE MIRASOL PUD AMENDMENT ConII<Mt., .A.u...h..."'.I'I...a... ~D.)1ilH DRAWING NAME: CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT 'C2' - RaP .5 os '"..'000' ABB PRO.ECT Na..: ACAD flU NAME: t1RAWltfG FtLL He.: SHEET, 78 9418C2 9418-1 , OF 3 . ... RUNDAGE, INe. Professional Engineers, Planners 6:. und Surveyors c.\l;Q-c-,'''~IIO''._;T'''N. . No......"', MJ" PIo,., (1U)JY'!"l1l1 -f_IJ>>'lJ66-nD1 ....C;-O"r. _c-o.lI.d~hil..lal..........,PI..}.ollJS l'Io-,tlJ~J91.JUI.hw,t1nl_l'" ORAWN BY; ~EMD 8'1'; D"lE' sCIIL.E:. ~ o I ....... ." ..... ~J.c;~' (i)~1 ... 1 ! d! ! P!p! P 111111 I f ! ! ! Ii! Ii o ,I ,II I h! I'll ffirn~llild! ~ ~ U ~ !I!!iil :> w cc '" o -- '" N -- Cl '" ~::);;::w ":::I'"a..o:::. ..-Uo ....0:::0'10 e:WOO"l ctz:go ,0:::0........ ~ON~ o U "-- ,":,,,,t;..- N!::!:! LU .. C1 a a Q.l =>oc:ro o..c:to.C M N ci :::i .: >- < III W " < !:: '" W :J: -'-I I f- d 1\ ~-, ! I . I t !I'.LHSil3S 1-7" :;INn H:JJ.VW '-rr L J.Hsns II l aNn H:lJ.YW ~ ..q ~ ci :::i .: >- < III W " ~ 0: w :J: t L 'lHi 33S L3~:l~ r rlHS33S f 3Nn H:u'lfW 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. ~: " .. n H ::....-::::....:::::!j ..._.....-:. .'.,.-z .:: ~::::::::::::::::::; ~ ~; 1~~: .-.-.....0...:-:.>.. Packet Page -2539- << I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Kl:V: "- ADDIE'S CORNER CPUD Fraser & Mohlke Associates, Inc. PROJECT: 2006090031 Post Office Box 2312, Naples, Florida 34106-2312 Date: 1/6/10 DUE: 2/4/10 Phone: 239/262-1410 Fax: 239/262-1150 E-mail: framoh@aol.com MEMORANDUM TO: Robert L. Duane, A.I.e.p. FROM: Fraser & MohlkeAssociates DATE: NovembeI 6, 2009 SUBJECT: Addie's Comer Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) - Response to a County Staff Future Land Use Map . (FLUE) Consistency Review with the CollieI County Growth Management Plan (GMP) APPLICATION NUMBER: PUD: Z-2009-AR-I4425 APPLICATION NAME: Addie's Cornel CPUD PETITION: The subject 23.33-acre CPUD is petitioning fof. a rezone from A (Rural Agri- cultural) to CPUD to permit a maximum of 135,000 square feet of gross leasable building area for retail, office, restaurant, and other mis- cellaneous non-Iesidential uses consistent with the C-l, Commercial Professional and General Office; C-2, Commercial Convenience; C-3, Commercial Intermediate; and C-4, General Commercial. Utilization equates to 5,786,54 square feet of leaseable space per acre. LOCATION: The subject ploperty is located northwest of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR-846) and the northern terminus of Collier Boulevard (CR-951). The property frontage begins approximately 660 linear feet west of Broken Back Road, an extension of CR-951, north to a canal parallel- ing CR-846, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a designated Urban Commercial District, Mixed- Use Activity CenteI #3 Sub-District, as de- picted on the FLUE of the GMP. ^a TTr1:-:n:a ~1ixtd TTC€' ^ cti.w~:ter 01!:T~^~C~ Sub-Distlict concentrates new commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can be accommodated readily to avoid strip and disor- ganized patterns of commercial development, and to create non-residential community focal points. A MUAC is intended to be mixed-use in characteI and interconnected with abutting projects, residential and/or commercial. Inter- nal streets, pedestrian pathways, and bike lane interconnections with abutting ploperties are encouraged. Conceptually, a MUAC is de- signed normally to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential uses, including commercial development as in the case of the subject Addie's Comer CPUD. Commercial development proposed fOI the subject CPUD includes acreage reserved for future right-of-way. Eligible land uses within MUAC #3 will include an array of commercial uses, institutional uses, and hotel/motel uses at a density consistent with the CollieI County Land Development Code (LDC). The Addie's Cornel CPUD is a commelcial project. Rezones within a MUAC are encour- aged to be in the form of a CPUD. Thele shall be no minimum acreage limitation for such a CPUD; howeveI, Iezoning requests must ad- here to a variety of requirements plomulgated in the LDC. The County Staff Report contends that the amount, type and location of existing zoned . commercial land, and developed commelcial uses, within the proposed Addie's Cornel CPUD and within two road miles of the subject Packet Page -2541- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t CPUD must be accounted for in the market study submitted in support of the CPUD. TRADE AREA DEFINITION: A calculation of consumer demand fOI goods and services is based on a defIned trade area extending beyond the conventional two-mile radius surrounding the center point of the subject CPUD. The Market-Conditions Study (3-23-09) pre- pared by FraseI & Mohlke Associates refer- enced in the County Staff Report (7-13-09) re- [I;;l~ Lv "Su}J}Julia.bh.. Culillll'l;l\.,~a.l' U~tJ~ i::I.L1\1 Land Use Recommendations" in Section II of the FraseI & Mohlke study (See pages II-23 and II-24) and its concluding SummarY of Findings in Section IV (See page IV-]) when discussing the dimensions of the proposed CPUD trade area. The larger-than-two-road-mile trade area advo- cated by Fraser & Mohlke recognizes that, "In order to betteI estimate population growth sur- rounding the area under study,., the population of a postal ZIP code that includes the eastern one-half of Mixed Use Activity Center #3 (ZIP 34120) was taken into account" East of the proposed Addie's Corner CPUD, CR-846 is the sole east-west road access route to MUAC #3, North of the CPUD, only the rutted Broken Back Road, a short, largely un- paved extension of CR-951, is the sole access route to CR-846 from undeveloped areas that comprise the Northwest Quadrant of Activity Center #3. Zoning maps (8615S, 8622N, and 8622S) confirming undeveloped land uses in the Northwest Quadrant can be submitted as supporting documentation. Adjacent to the Addie's Corner site is the Tree Farm Planned Unit Development (PUD); the County Staff Report characterizes it as the.,." vacant and idle Tree Farm POO." Further, the Staff Report states the,."Tree Farm PUD is approved for 175,000 square feet of commer- cial/office development on 18.69 acres, of which a minimum of 5,000 square feet will be developed with professional or medical office uses." East of MUAC #3, commercial development along CR-846 is limited to that approved for the Heritage Bay PUD totaling 230,000 square feet of commercial development on 73.50 acres. Approximately 200,000 square feet of this approved commercial development is al- lowed within MUAC #3 and 30,000 square feet of commercial development is allowed within the 26 acres of the Village Centers located out- sid~.A:C #3 bell widl1u ewu l<fdial"1IDtes uf the Addie's Cornel CPUD, West of MUAC #3, commercial development along CR-846 is limited to the Olde Cypress Preserve, a 12.5-acre commercial development north of CR-846 with a potential of 165,000 square feet of leaseable space, of which 40,889 square feet have been developed. A contiguous 0.28-acre parcel is the site of a small restaurant occupying 1,672 square feet These properties on CR-846 are approximately 1.5 miles west of the proposed Addie's Corner CPUD, well out- side MUAC #3. The Southwest Quadrant of MUAC #3 is occu- pied by the Richland PUD approved for 231,000 square feet of neighborhood commu- nity commelcial development on 21.80 acres. Known locally as "Pebblebrook" it encom- passes 11.73 acres, or 53,8 percent of Rich- land's 21.80 acres, and 98,642 square feet, 01 42.7 percent, of Richland's allowable 231,000 square feet, of which 165,752 square feet have been developed. Pebblebrook is classified as a COlumunity Shopping Center that has among its established uses fInancial institutions, res- taurants and drive-ins, offices, and professional services. Utilization equates to 10,596.33 square feet of leaseable space per acre. An in- ventory of users in the Richland PUD for the years 2004 and 2009 demonstrates remarkable stability among the array of retail, office, res- taurants, and otheI enterprises operating there over the five-year period analyzed. A listing of these varied enterprises for the years 2004 and 2009 is available on request, The Southeast Quadrant of MUAC #3 is de- voted almost entirely to a 32.55-acre wholesale plant nursery known locally as the Pelican Nursery Calk/a The Tree Plateau). The County Staff Report notes the... "presentnursery op- eration is viewed as an agricultural land use." The same Staff Report concludes that this pres- ently viable wholesale plant nursery will be- come a connercial development competing directly with future business enterprises located in the Addie's Cornel CPUD. III ....aivuldlme; the; di.LllC;J..L~~UW:i vI a. I..>vlll,tJcu.d vc connercial development on the Pelican Nurs- ery site, the Staff Report asserts, "Applying the generally accepted figure of 10,000 square feet of connercial development per acre - yields 325,500 square feet of potential connercial development" on the nursery site, equating to 9,984.64 square feet of leaseable space per acre. TIlls unconditioned Staff Report assertion is not accompanied by any demonstration of: 1. Interest in or action by the owneI/operatoI of the Pelican Nursery in pursing retail, office and restaurant uses on the Tree Plateau property; 2. Mitigation that may be required when Collier County is petitioned to designate the 32.55-acle site as a "Tree Plateau CPUD" that could reduce significantly the site's development potential and level of acreage utilization; and 3. Questionable economic assumptions that could lessen petitioner interest in accelerating a CPUD application during the current recessionary period, The County Staff "Future Land Use Map (FLUE) Consistency Review" analysis con- cluded that, "The potential and approved com- mercial square footage, and potential and ap- proved connercial acreage within MUAC #3 is approximately 1,091,500 square feet and 144 acres, respectively, inclusive of the subject pe- tition. " 4/12/2011 Item 17A In Iecalculating the level of connercial devel- opment to the year 2015. it is reasonable to conclude that a calculation of potential and ap- proved connelcial square footage and poten- tial and approved connercial acleage within . MUAC #3 should be based only on full utiliza- tion of plesently approved planned unit devel- opments, both zoned and not zoned, and that all hypothetical CPUDprojects within should be eliminated from consideration. Such a recalculation within MUAC #3 would 'yield 141,000 S4.UC1J.C feel. and l!1.5L. acres re- spectively, a moderate ovelall utilization rate of 6,656.49 square feet per aCle. In assessing developed and undeveloped land outside MUAC #3. the County Staff Report contends, "The potential and approved com- mercial square footage, and potential and ap- proved connercial acreage within two Iadial miles from the subject property but outside Activity Center No.3, is approximately 637,894 sq. ft. and 175 aCles, respectively." A Iecapitulation of the parcels developed and undeveloped commercial square feet and acreage outside MUAC #3 and within 2.0 ra- dial miles of the subject Addie's Cornel CPUD is in the attached Table 1 (Developed) and Table 2 (Developed and Undeveloped). They demonstrate that a total of 179,999 square feet on 58.80 acres have been devel- oped, and that 457,895 square feet on 116.25 acles remain undeveloped. A "potential" but as yet undeveloped 366,310 square feet of "approved" connercial sited on 41.99 acres are 2.0 miles south of the subject Addie's Cornel CPUD. They are lo- cated in the Mission Hills, Carolina Village, and Sonoma Oaks developments northwest of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension and CR-951, 2.0 miles south of Addie's Cornel. The 2.0-mile interval be- tween these three developments and Addie's Corner Iepresents the standard spacing inter- val between anchoI food and drug outlets throughout CollieI County. Packet Page -2543- E Q) :: ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t The County Staff Report suggestion that the Mission Hills, Carolina Village, and Sonoma Oaks developments would be directly com- petitive with commercial development lo- cated at Addie's Cornel appears, at best, problematic! <( I"- ..-- COUNTY STAFF REPORT CONCLUSION: Even without any consideration of the above reported recalculations of available commer- cial square feet and acreage within MUAC #3, the County Staff Report concluded that, ''"Ph,.; luLO::lIl'uLl::uti.",l aDd C1Pl'lUl'~d \...um- mercial square footage, and potential and approved commercial acreage within two radial miles from the subject property and ~ Activity Center No.3. is approxi- mately 1,729,394 sq. ft. and 319 acres, re spectively - sufficient to meet the demand for !!oods and services throu!!h the year 2009 for the lar!!er-than-two road mile trade area studied. Only then is a deficit apparent as commercial acreage demand begins to exceed acreage available." Findings from information provided in this memorandum are summarized below: 1. For the indefinite future, the presently viable wholesale Pelican NUlsery is un- likely to become an approved commer- cial planned unit development and therefore not likely to be in direct com- petition with future business enterprises located in the Addie's Comer CPUD; 2. A recalculated 74] ,000 square feet and ] 11.32 aCles respectively, a moderate overall utilization rate of 6,656A9 square feet pel acre within MUAC #3; 3. Aggregate commercial square footage and acreage through 2009 is sufficient to meet the demand for goods and services for the larger-than-two road mile trade area studied; and 4. Beginning in 20] 0, a trade area deficit will become apparent as commercial acreage demand begins to exceed the commercial acreage available, REEVALUATION OF VIABLE CPUD COMMERCIAL USES: Exhibit "A" of the ploposed Addie's Comer CPUD lists Ieple- sentative Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) groups for considelation as consistent with the purpose and intent of applicable zon- ing standards and appropriate as commelcial uses for the Addie's Comer site. Recent reaffirmations by the Collier Metro- politan Planning Organization (MPO) and its counterpart MPO in Lee County of the need to ~~l~lld CR.-~'::;l ~llLu L~l;i Cuuuly, ha::, lc;v~v~d interest in adding lodging places as a Permitted Principal Use within the subject Addie's COI- ner CPUD. Adding Hotels & Motels (SIC 7011), with a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) not to exceed 0,60, as a permitted use deserves considelation.. The Standard Industrial Classification Manual (1987) published by the federal Office of Man- agement and Budget, lists Hotels and Motels under Industry Group Number 70] as "Com- mercial establishments, known to the public as hotels, motor hotels, motels, or tourist courts, primarily engaged in providing lodging, or lodging and meals, to the general public." The closest lodging facility, the Hampton Inn, is located 3,5-roadmiles west of the Addie's Comer CPUD at 2630 Northbrooke Plaza Drive immediately northeast of Interstate 75 (1- 75) Exit 1]1, 1-75 is Collier's last direct north- south road access to urban Lee County east of the Tamiami Trail (US-4]). East of Addie's Comer on CR-846 there is no existing hotel 01 motel facility except in the Immokalee community approximately 32 road miles northeast South, the closest existing ho- tel or motel facility is the Quality Inn, 4100 Golden Gate Parkway, 6.0 road miles from Ad- die's Corner. The long-term prospect of a Col- lier Boulevard/CR-951 extension into Lee County enhances greatly opportunities for de- velopment of a hotel or motel in Addie's Cor- ner providing lodging and meals to the genelal public' 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. Currently, tlansportation consultants under contract to the Collier MPO and the Lee MPO are engaged in assessing the j oint surface trans- portation needs of both counties under a federal mandate to complete a 2035 Long Range Tlansportation Plan (LRTP) by 2011. The con- sultant work program for the 2035 LRTP can be made available on request; documentation of recent MFO Ieview of planning for an exten- sion of CR-95 1 as an alternate route into Lee County to relieve future congestion on 1-75 can b":"!-,.l-v,,:d\.-du...> n....H. In sum, Flaser & Mohlke supports the addition Hotels & Motels (SIC 7011), with a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) not to exceed 0.60, as a permitted use for the Addie's Comer CPUD. -END- , Packet Page -2545- ;: '" ';; '" 0: >. " C '" 1;; '<i; C o U (L 2 C9 .., 'Ilo U <( " '" Q, o a; > '" " C ::J "0 '" 0, o a; > '" "0 C ::J "0" '" '" 0,0, o 0 ::J, oo VI '"' VI oo a; a; :;; ::J '"' ::J ::J ::J > ro ro ro ro > & 0- '" '" .., en en en en "0" 'Ilo oo oo C C ... C LD C 0 C C ::J ::J Cll co 0 - '" LD ~ 0 '" '" oo- t: ... to ... CD ... ~ 0 ... & Cll ::J ::J ",. ::J ::J ... U U m 0 0 0 " oo ~:>( m 0 <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t o ::J (L o OJ t: ... o U oo ~~ " " <( LD N ~ ~ ~ Q:, <!= m o o N , N o ::J (L ~ - ";: ;: <.I <( Cll III ::J " Cll .~ :;; Cll " 'iji - ::l o 'Ill Cll III ::J " t: I1l ..J '" 'Ilo U'" <(OO ::J::J 2m -"0 0... CD 1;; '" ;;: 0 :Eo o z OQ oo '" t; ro N o r-: t: o :ai " o ..J ~N NN , , mm NN , , co co ~~ '" 'Ilo o CD <( oo ::J::J 2m - .~ o '" 1;; ~ g to o Z VI '" '" ~ cc E ~~ ~1 U~" 0 0 :Eou. :': a; . 5:~(I) .gj0 C II~ ...~~ DO ~~~ CDO o o ::J 8: a; " ro (L oo >.w ro- <D15 ",0 "'CD l!!", "C co (1)= :1:> "'''"' NN tOtb NN , , co co ~""' .~I ~I oo '" " ro o o m N oo '" " .~ CD "'C:: oo I1l ::J t: o 0 "" ,- C oo '" oo ",2 ... 0 ",... ,,0. Coil ro oo 1;; '" .;:: .2 0::0 E U::O o ~N~m N"OI LDLDO ill ..q-m~ ~ -I'" itl C"i N ",- 5:~~ .gj0 C ro r- ""'I~ ~I"'~LDNCO Q) MmN Q.oco ..- ..Q (l) ~I '" > "I >CD<( "'0 o '" '>t 0'" <(OO ::J::J 2m 0'0 ~ w oo E ~ E ",,0 :;0 o (I) oo ,!!! o ::J 0. "" '" " ... ro (L ~ LD '" '" row " " to ro 0.0. LD LD '" '" cbcb NN cbch ~~ t '" 'Ilo U '" <( oo ::J::J 20; '0 I~ ~ '" iil E ;: E "" 0 :;U o (I) VI ~ r r oo CD ro ... <DB oo oo- - ro '" ,- o " -, ... '" >'E ~ E ... 0 ~u o 0 O~O N""O l.OOl.O (l) ..-o~ .~ Iu::~co-oro -..2 ...-..- ~ OJ . 5:>(1) '" .gjo C ~"I~~H~ Cl) '<;tOv a...Q cu ~ o Q.) ~ c W > 0 ::J >"'<( CDO o m 15 I- o ::J 8: a; " ro (L m ",0 ""I- ro ..J ro 'c ... DB 'ro N(I) moo " ro ... '" ro ,_ 0.0: coco NN , , CD CD NN , , co co ~~ C o ~ " o ..J ""'~ N", ;0 m ... '" c '" u '" C (/) -6- OOCDO, CD ... 0 roB.!: (I) VI (I) Q) co >. .~.~ :g oQ):::i E E E BEE ::J 0 0 <(oU LDr-oIN COQC>>CO -qr--<DCO "'>t-..q--('I")~N o~ ~~ LDO"'lco NO I'- en o>otcit.r.i ~~'" VI a; !::> ro 0. VI ::J oo 0- ~~I l'-J2c --0 CD CD._ " " VI ... VI oo co.- .- 0.22 ~~~ '" '" '" IDmcD NNN , , , co co co ~~~ .-< 11' .0 ro I- ~~~ ",N", -N - '" 'I'-- I'--co.., ,<""NO) g~~ . m . co""'''' '" 'I'-- ~.... m o I- ";ro'Cii -- - 000 1-1-1- "u" Cll C t: c..~ta .2C9(5 Cll_ > 0 Cll~ Co ::: OJ ';;; OJ 'r: ~ ~ a; en "0; c o U a. :;:: CD -0 Ol C- o C;; -c Ol C- o C;; > Ol -c c ;;J -0 ,~ 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. -0 Ol C- o W >. Ol -0 > '" '!l '" c- '" ~"C"C""O-c""O Ol ~ ... ;;J ;;J ? -0 - ~ ~ 0 &OJQ.)Q.)Q)W C '" d- O '" Cl)a..o.c..c.c.. ::l 1i5 '" (/) (/) 0 1i5 00000 -0 C '" ~ ,- o/S C ~IDQ)lJ.)QjQ) "" c c CO>>>>> c Ol '" !'! !'! -0 ~ Q.l CD Q) CD Q.) '" ~ Ol 0"0 "0-0 "0 "'CI ~ ~ ~ ~ c- ~ vCCCc.c -0 ;;J CD ;;J ;;J 0 ;;J o/5::l::l::l::J::J Ol U U U '" U .., - o ::J a. u ~ OJ C ~ o -' '" -Ol '6 -c ~ '" N '" '" ~ r:i: ~ a, o o ')I N o ::J a. ~ c/); I..) ~ () ~ '~~ ::l Ol Ol::l Ol ~~ Q)~ :::3 Om CI) CO 0- .u :J C ....~ en'o E .Q rtJ U en as '- c en CL)..... I.... Q.) m ID Q) en ~ Q) ro 0 .c:E (1),2.c ro.- _ E .... 0 _ tI) ~o 01'- =0 00- ~'E ,~() -00... Ou -Q.).~ CC'IJ on S06 CJ) oe ;;J ~ '" '" -, Ol E~ '" -'" >'E w __(1) UJ (l).!!. Q) E u.; 'C.~ rn E DOl E .Qll= E WO ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~D~~~1~~ ~-OJ~,~~~~-OI~~~~~-CJ~~g~~~~~~ ~O~~~~~O~M m~o~roD~~V~~~ ~w ' ~c;; "~W ~~- Ct) 6; CI) iD (() en 6; U) -0 -00 -00 :: l: t: ~11~~I~~II~~I~~JI~:::I~~~~I~~ mID ~O~Q)Q) MmNmQ) ~OvmOID~= 0.0 0.0 co .,.... C.o ~ .,.....,....('1"')10 ~Qj~. .9Q)~ .Em,- a>>O Q)>t> m>U => >Ol~ >Ol >Ol~ 010 010 010 C C C a.> rn 10 1: 0 0 W f- f- "'", Ol . ~U a._ mN ",0 wo c..cO >. '" Uc;; Ol 0 :!2C6 00. o c;; > Ol C ;;;- '10 () ~ ::l ~ '" '10 ~ .. - c .. () ~ .;;: ., <.> ~ .. '" ::l -0 .. >< ~ Ol -0 .iij - ::r o '" .. '" ::l -0 ~ i; ..J Oi ~ Ol E E o () ~ I..) ~ ::l Ol :!!:'" ....::J 0", -"- '" e ~ w .c t: ~U '" ~ "s .... o c o ., '" :; - c. '" <.> .. c:: '" Ol " ro N o r--: ~ 2 c Ol U Cl c 'a. c- o .c (/) ~I Ol' ~ , -'" MM QiCii 0<'> ~ ~ '" '" a. a. "'''' MM , , CD CD NN , , """" "'''' I I ~N NN , , CDID NN , , "" co "'~ o ::J a. - c;; o ~ '" a. rn Olo ""f- ro ..J ro "c ~ 02 ,ro N(/) -- Ol '" e '" 00.9 a.C:: """" NN . , CD CD NN , , """" "'''' > Ol o '" c;; o ~ ro a. '" ;;J '" 0- OID:: , c:r: t-....~c --0 co W._ 00'" ~ '" '" co.-.- a.:;:::;:: "''''''' MMM , , , CD CD CD NNN , , , "" "" "" "''''''' Packet Page -2547- I rom ~- 00 f-f- -0 Ol c- o c;; > .. c '" Ol ~ o '" co '" Lri ~ ~ M QJ 2 'It Ol C C Ol W U'" U U ~::l ~rn ~ ~ :EI~'5.. ~'Q.m~ _ Q) a. .... c.. '- ~ o ~ .9~.8..9 ~ E Cf) en U) f/) en ::0 >. rn>.""ffi""ffi EO :g c'~~'~'e o :J ~ CD::l Q) Q) N EgEEEE c E""EEEE :c oeoooo ~:Iou..~~il~i~ i~ .coM~C)~dl ..JOl(/) :J ,," .. C c.::J ~-OlQ)~~~~~~' ~OO'lf'-co't""""(oI.O(j) "'0- ctl N..:::tT"""T'"" c: ~ ~ ::J<DO -o~ C ::J o ::J a. - c;; o ~ ro a. Ol '" (: W ~ 2 Ol ro D: en 0.. 4.1 - ..... en Oi en ~Q):JC/)('IJ"::'::: IDe 0== ro O-Q)~I>O >,0 ro c ro m UOl~o~E ID g c.>"oo 0 g ::2=.~.~mo O>:;:::;::U(/) ...-v v "::I" v "::I" NNMMMC") 1 I , , I I COCOc.DWCDCD NNNNNN , I I , 1 I cocoro co co co ..qoo::t"::l""::t"::l"~ I N ~ Ll '" f- ~~~ ",co", -I'- _ ..... '..... ",-", ",I'-", ~~::g cD;U; ... '..... '!'"'lli~ cu"'ffini - -"- 000 f-f-f- -0-0-0 Ol c c c..~m .!2Cl15 Ol- > 0 ~~ c ::l PUD Z-2009-AR-14425 Addie's Caner CPUD GMP Consistency Review Tenants in the Shoppes At Pebblebrooke, 15265-15295 Collier Boulevard/CR-951 Unit Name of Commercial Enterprise Leasing Unit Occupancy Occupancy New Occupant Number Tenant Name 2004 2009 Since 2004 <.( Publix Supermarket, 15265 Collier Boulevard/CR-951 Yes Yes No I"- ..- E Q) Multi-Unit Address, 15275 Collier Boulevard/CR-951 ...... ..-- 200 H & R Block Yes Yes No ..-- 0 N 201 Mail Box, Etc, Yes Yes No -- N ..-- 202 Great Clips For Hair Yes Yes No -- '<t 203 II Primo Pizza & Wings Yes Yes No 204 Peter N, Nguyen, P,A: Veterinarian Yes Yes No 205 Pebblebrooke Dentistry Yes Yes No 206 Salon Bellezza Yes Yes No 207 Allstate Insurance: Sabrina Dulaney Insurance Agency Yes No Yes 207 Allstate Insurance: Ted Todd Insurance Agency No Yes Yes 208 Domino's Pizza Yes Yes No 209 China Gourmet Yes Yes No 210 Fashion Fresh Dry Cleaners Yes Yes No Colonial Bank, 15285 Collier Boulevard/CR-951 Yes Yes No McDonald's, 15291 Collier Bouievard/CR-951 Yes Yes No Walgreen Drug Store, 15295 Collier Boulevanj/CR-951 Yes Yes No Table 3 HM HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS, PlANNERS, SURVEYORS lANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 950 Encore Way. Naples, Florida 34110' Phone: 239.254.2000 . Fax: 239.254.2099 4/12/2011 Item 17A April 23, 2009 Mr. Michael Levy Collier County - CDES 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 REV: 1 ADDIE'S CORNER CPUD PROJECT: 2006090031 Date: 4/27/09 DUE: 5/25/09 RE: Addie's Corner CPUD Application HM No.: 2006.100 Dear ML Levy: Enclosed are 24 copies of a petition to rezone 23.33 acres located on the north side of Immokalee Road approximately 600 feet west of CollieI Boulevard. (See enclosed location map.) The Pre-application Meeting Notes along with a check in the amount of $16,425.00, which includes the $500.00 pre-application fee credit, are also enclosed. 1. BACKGROUND The zoning classification of the subject property is "A" Rural Agricultural, The designation on the Future Land Use Map is Mixed Use Activity Center #3, located at the intersection of Irrunokalee Road and CR 951. The subject property is located entirely within in the Activity Center. (See attached map fOI Activity Center #3 from the FLUE) The subject property is located to the east is the Tree Farm MPUD also located in the Activity Center. Land to the north is vacant, as is the subject property, and adjacent to the west is the Mirasol residential PUD which is also vacant. (See enclosed aerial photo.) 2. PROPOSED REOUEST This application is requesting a rezone from the "A" Rural Agricultural zoning district to the Commercial PUD zoning district, The name of the proposed PUD is Addie's Corner CPUD and up to 135,000 s.f. of retail 01 office use is allowed. The ploject will consist of commercial development, with a compatible mix of Ietail goods and services, medical and professional offices and restaurants as principal uses. A preserve area comprising +/- 8.19 acres is also included in the northern portion of the property, which will form a buffer for lands to the north, while a landscaped buffer plus an access road will separate the development from the Mirasol property to the west, Access is provided on the western side of the property, generally aligned with Pebblebrooke Drive on the south side of Immokalee Road and an east bound directional left is provided into the property including a right-inlright-out. Shared access shall also be provided through the Tlee H:\2006\20061 00\ WP\RLD\CPUD Rezone 2009\Submittal\ML app cover leneLdoc Packet Page -2549- Naples' Fort Myers' Venice RE: Addie's Corner CPUD Application HMNo,; 2006,100 Page 2 of4 Farm MPUD located to the east of the subject property that is required by this MPUD. Reservations for the future right-of-way for the widening of the canal along Immokalee Road are also incorporated into this CPUD. 3. COLLIER COUNTY GMP/FLUE E Q) ...... The proposed CPUD is consistent with the policies and objectives of the OMP and FLUE. The Activity Center designation is designed to concentrate new commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can be accommodated, avoiding disorganized strip patterns and creating focal points within the community. The development plan, as described in the CPUD application, will be compatible ",'ith surrounding land uses, contributing to the convenience of surrounding residential neighborhoods. (See attached rezoning application with applicable PUD and rezoning criteria identifying further compliance with the OMP and the LDC.) <t; I"- ..-- ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t 4. mSTORICAL/ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The subject property has not been identified as having historic/archaeological resources based on a review of the Collier County Index of Historical/Archaeological Maps. A letter to this effect from the State of Florida is attached. Therefore, a waiver from the historical/archeological requirements is requested. 5. MARKET STUDY Based on results of the attached market study prepared by Frasier and Mohlke, there is a need for the retail and office space uses planned at this location, 6. TRANSPORTATION Located on Immokalee Road ",'ith convenient access to Collier Boulevard, and potential joint access to other commercial development, the site is well situated with respect to the transportation network. Based on the attached TIS and proposed development commitments, access to the proposed CPUD will be from the proposed CR 951 Exiension and through the Tree Farm MPUD until such time as 1mmokalee Road and 1-75 are found to be concurrent. With this limitation pertaining to access, the CPUD can, therefore, be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Tlansportation Element. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL Based on the EIS prepared by Turrell, Hall and Associates, a preserve area consisting of a minimum of 8.85 acres is proposed to be located in the wooded northern portion of the site, also providing a substantial buffer between proposed commercial use and potential future Iesidential uses. The proposed preserve area substantially exceeds the 5.66 acres Iequired to be preserved pursuant to the LDC. H:\2006\2006100\WP\RLD\CPUD Rezone 2009\Submittal\ML app cover letter.doc 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. RE: Addie's Comer CPUD Application HMNo.: 2006.100 Page 3 of 4 8. DEVIATIONS A deviation is Iequested for a reduction from 60 feet to 42 feet for the private internal roadways. exclusive of the main entrance access to Immokalee Road, for which this deviation shall not apply (Deviation No.1). A deviation is also proposed to eliminate a requirement for a wall to be placed along the east and west property lines outside the preserve area with the proposed Type B buffers (Deviation No.2). A deviation to allow a sidewalk only on one side of the internal access drive (Deviation No, 3). (See Exhibit E, List of Requested Deviations.) If you Iequile any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. ~~~ Robert L. Duane, AICP Planning Dilector Enclosures cc: Larry Pomposini Richard D, Y ovanovich, Esquire H:\2006\2006100\WP\RLD\CPUD Rezone 2009\Submittal\ML app cover letter. doc Packet Page -2551- RE: Addie's Comer CPUD Application HMNo.: 2006.100 Page 4 of4 E Q) ...... Enclosed are the following: . Twenty-four (24) copies of a cover letter outlining the requested amendment . Twenty-four (24) copies of completed Application (wi Exhibits A, B, E & F) . Twenty-four (24) copies of Justifications to Exhibit E . Twenty-four (24) copies of Evaluation Criteria . Twenty-four (24) copies of Rezoning Criteria . Twenty-four (24) copies of Activity Center #3 map . Twenty-four (24) copies ofMirasol PUD Master Plan (8 Yz x II) . Twenty-four (24) copies of the Tree Farm MPUD Master Plan (8 Yz x II) . Twenty-four (24) copies of the Pre-Application Meeting Notes . Twenty-four (24) copies of the PUD Conceptual Master Site Plan "24 X 36" and one (I) "8 Yz X II" . Two (2) copies of Deeds I Legal's . Two (2) copies of the List identifying Owner and All Parties of Corporation . Two (2) copies of the Ownerl Affidavit signed and notarized . Two (2) copies of the Covenant of Unified Control . Two (2) copies of the Addressing Checklist . Four (4) copies of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) . One (I) Digital/electronic copy ofEIS (on CDROM) . Four (4) copies of Historical/Archeological Survey waiver request (letter) . Four (4) copies of Utility Provisions Statement . Four (4) copies of Utility Connections map . Four (4) copies of Survey, signed and sealed . Seven (7) copies of Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) or waiver . Three (3) copies of Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) on CDROM . Four (4) copies of Market Study . Five (5) copies of Aerial photograph . One (I) CD Rom of all documents in Word format and plans <( I"- ..-- ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t H:\2006\2D06100\WP\RLD\CPUD Rezone 2009\Submittal\ML app cover letter. doc 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 A REV: 1 DOlE'S CORNER CPUD PROJECT: 2006090031 EVALUATION CRITERIA Date: 4/27/09 DUE: 5/25/09 ADDIE'S CORNER CPUD PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section IO.02.13.B) 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land. surrounding areas, traffic access, drainage, sewer, water and other utilities. The subject property is located within Activity Center #3 on the north side ofImmokalee Road and west of CR 95 L The lands to east are zoned for the Tree Farm MPUD (also located in the Activity Center) and vacant. This PUD will allow a mix of commercial and residential uses. Lands to the east are zoned for the Marisol PUD and are vacant. The Marisol PUD permits residential uses. Lands on the south side ofImmokalee Road and west of CR 951 are zoned for the Richland PUD and are developing with commercial land uses, with residentially zoned lands developing within the Pebblebrooke PUD. The subject property has access to sewer and water facilities, ease of access onto Immokalee Road and drainage facilities can be readily accommodated by existing and proposed drainage improvements including the Immokalee Road drainage canal, In summary. the subject property and its proposed commercial uses are suitable for the type and pattern of development existing and emerging around the subject property and the physical characteristics of the land will support the proposed rezoning request. Traffic access, drainage, sewer, water and other utilities are conducive to supporting the request to establish consistency with this criteria with the condition that access be limited to CR 951 and through the Tree Farm MPUD until such time as Immokalee Road is concurrent, 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The property is under unified control for the purpose offiling this rezoning application. There are no facilities that will require continuing operation or maintenance at public expense and onsite facilities will be maintained by an association. 3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district. policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district. policy or other provision.) Packet Page -2553- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t The following sets forth how Addie's Corner is consistent with the Growth Management Plan and Future Land Use Element. The subject property is located in the northwest corner of Activity Center #3 and 135,000 square feet of non-residential land use is proposed on the 233 acres of the subject property. (XIII) Objective 7 - In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Policy 7.1 of the FLUE The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads. The proposed PUD has direct access to lmmokalee Road which is an arterial roadway. Policy 7.2 The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The proposed PUD has an interconnection to the Tree Farm MPUD, a mixed use project to the east of the subject property that will allow ease of access for both properties onto lmmokalee Road and a limited access to allow residents from Mariso! access to and from Addie's Corner which will be controlled by an access gate, (See PUD Master Plan.) Compliance with this policy, therefore, is met with the proposed provisions for shared access. Policy 7.3 All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. As noted, interconnection is established to the east and west to establish consistency with this policy. Policy 7.4 The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. This policy is not applicable to the proposed PUD rezoning because the requested zoning is for commercial uses within Activity Center No.3. Policy 7.5 The County shall encourage mixed-use development within the same buildings by allowing residential dwelling units over and/or abutting commercial development. This policy shall be implemented through provisions in specific subdistricts in this Growth Management Plan. 4/12/2011 Item 17A This policy is not applicable to the proposed request as no residential uses are proposed in this rezoning request. Policy 7.6 The County shall explore the creation of an urban" greenway" network along existing major canal banks and powerline easements. The proposed rezoning request has reserved right-of-way for the expansion of the lmmokalee Road canal and a greenway along the canal. Policy 7.7 The Community Development and Environmental Services Division will continue to research smart growth practices in an effort to improve the future of Collier County by specifically addressing land use and transportation planning techniques for inclusion in future land development regulations. Acknowledged, Policy 5.1 of the Transponation Element notes that all rezoning applications shall consider the impacts on the overall system and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five year planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved. The subject rezoning is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element as it will not adversely affect the service level of affected roadways, Policy 5.3 Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by combining urban intensity development to areas designated as urban in the public land use map...... The proposed development of this PUD will not result in unacceptable levels of urban sprawl because it is located in a portion of the urban area that is that is already developed and is a designated Activity Center which allow nonresidential uses. Policy 5.4 ofthe FLUE Requires that new developments shall be compatible with and complementary to surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. Compliance with this policy can be met based on the surrounding land use pattern, its location within Activity Center No.3, existing and planned uses for the area, and the proposed development standards. (See also PUD Rezoning Criteria.) (LDC Section IO.02.13,B contained in this application,) Packet Page -2555- <{ I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t Additional factors to consider during review of a rezone petition are as follows; Rezones within Mixed Use Activity Centers are encouraged to be in the fonn of a Planned Unit Development. There shall be no minimum acreage limitation for such Planned Unit Developments except all requests for rezoning must meet the requirements for rezoning in the Land Development Code. The proposed rezoning request is in the fonn of a planned unit development zoning. The proposed rezoning meets the requirements for rezoning in the Land Development Code. Market demand and service area for the proposed commercial land uses to be used as a guide to explore the feasibility ofthe requested land uses. The proposed rezoning request is in the fonn of a planned unit development zoning. The proposed rezoning meets the requirements for rezoning in the Land Development Code. The amount, type and location of existing zoned commercial land. and developed commercial uses, within the Mixed Use Activity Center and within two road miles of the Mixed Use Activity Center. The amount, type and location of existing zoned commercial and developed commercial uses, within the Activity Center and within two road miles of the Mixed Use Activity Center is provided in a report prepared by Frasier and Mohlke and Associates. The report prepared by Frasier and Mohlke and Associates concludes that there is sufficient demand to support the 135,000 s.f of commercial development proposed in this rezoning request, to establish consistency with this criteria, Existing patterns of land use within the Mixed Use Activity Center and within two radial miles. Data and analysis included in the attached market study inventories the nonresidential uses within a two mile radius of the Activity Center. And an aerial photo is included in the Market Study depicting a two mile radius. Adequacy of infrastructure capacity, particularly roads. The attached Traffic Impact Study (TIS) concludes that the proposed CPUD will need to initially access the CR 951 Extension through the Tree Farm MPUD located to the east of the subject property until such time as Immokalee Road is found to be concurrent with this stipulation found in Exhibit F, Transportation Improvements. The CPUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element Compatibility of the proposed development with. and adequacy of buffering for, adjoining properties. The proposed PUD is buffered to the north by a wetland preserve area and Type B buffers will be placed along the east and west property lines, Lands to the east are zoned for the Tree Fann 4/12/2011 Item 17A MPUD, a mixed use planned unit development, and lands to the west are zoned for the Marisol PUD, a residential planned unit development. However. no residential uses are planned along the eastern edge ofMarisol which abuts the subject property. See attached Mirasol PUD Master Plan compliance with this criteria are met based on the emerging land use pattern, screening and buffering, the proposed preserve area, combined with the proposed development standards and limitations on building height. (See Exhibit B, proposed Development Standards.) Natural or man-made constraints. As can be see seen from the PUD Master Plan. a preserve areas comprising +/- 8,85 acres is shown on the PUD Master Plan for the preservation of wetlands. That is a natural constraint. The proposed preservation area exceeds the county's preservation area requirement by +/. 3. Manmade constraints include the canal along the north side of lrnmokalee Road that will require a bridge to be placed over the canal for access. (See CPUD Master Plan.) Compliance with this criteria is met by the preservation of wetlands in recognition of their natural constraint. Rezoning criteria identified in the Land Development Code. Compliance with criteria in the Land Development Code are met. See PUD and Rezoning Criteria contained in this PUD application. Conformance with Access Management Plan provisions for Mixed Use Activity Centers contained in the Land Development Code Conformance with Access Management Plan prOVISIOns for Mixed Use Activity Centers contained in the Land Development Code are met (See CPUD Master Plan.) Coordinated traffic flow on-site and off-site, as may be demonstrated by a Traffic Impact Analysis, and a site plan/master plan indicating on-site traffic movements, access point locations and type, median opening locations and type on the abutting roadway(s), location of traffic signals on the abutting roadway(s), and internal and external vehicular and pedestrian interconnections. The PUD Master Plan proposes and east bound directional left turn from lmmokalee Road into the PUD and a right-in/right-out into the proposed access from Immokalee Road. (See PUD Master Plan.) Shared access is provided from the Tree Farm PUD located to the east of the subject property, including pedestrian access. Limited access is proposed to be shared with the Marisol PUD to the west to allow ingress only through a gate into Addie's Comer. Marisol is expected to be a gated community and uncontrolled access from the proposed PUD is considered unfeasible. A traffic signal is located at the intersection ofImmokalee Road and CR 951. Access to this traffic signal will be made available to this PUD based on the shared access provisions. Compliance with this provision is made based on the access provisions provided on the PUD Master Plan along ImmokaJee Road, an arterial roadway, including project interconnections. Interconnection(s) for pedestrians, bicycles and motor vehicles with existing and future adjacent projects. Packet Page -2557- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t The PUD Master Plan provides for interconnection with adjacent properties. Compliance with this criteria will be met at the time of application for site development plan apploval. Conformance with the architectural design standards as identified in the Land Development Code. Compliance with this criteria will be met at the time of application for site development plan approval. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses. which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed CPUD documents involving the Master Plan have been designed to be both internally and externally compatible with existing and future land uses. (See attached CPUD Master Plan,) See also Exhibit B proposed development standards and response to FLUE criteria pertaining to compatibility under Criteria No.3 to establish consistency with this criteria, S. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The subject property includes open space areas in excess of 60% largely due to size of the preserve area. Open space required is 30% and the proposed CPUD substantially exceeds this criteria, therefore, compliance with this criteria can be met 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The CPUD proposes to phase the development to coincide with improvements that need to be made to Immokalee Road to the four lane condition under 1-75 by initially limiting access through the Tree Farm MPUD to the east until improvements are made to Immokalee Road. With this proposed mitigation the transportation facilities should be deemed adequate for ensuring the availability of needed improvements, With the proposed phasing, the project can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The subject property is located in an Activity Center (Activity Center No.3) with access to Immokalee Road and the future extension ofCR 951 through the Tree Farm MPUD to the east of the subject property. The CPUD is located in an area well suited to accommodate the expansion of the general area and the need is supported for commercial uses by the attached Market Study to support expansion of the area, 8. Conformity with PUD regulations. or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 4/12/2011 Item 17A The proposed CPUD is consistent with applicable provisions o:f PUD regulations notwithstanding the deviations proposed with regard to walls along the e~st and west property lines, a reduction in internal right of way width and limiting a sidewalk to- only one side of the internal access drive. Packet Page -2559- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t PUDZ-2009-AR ADDIE'S CORNI 4/12/2011 Item 17A PROJECT: 2006090031 Date: 4/27/09 DUE: 5/25/09 REZONING CRITERIA COMPLIANT WITH LDC SECTION 10.03.05 I. Addie's Corner CPUD 10.03.051. Nature of requirements of planning commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning ofland, the report and recommendations of the planning commission to the board of county commissioners required in 10,02.12 D. shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the growth management plan. The proposed change is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Future Land Use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. (See also Rezoning Criteria No.3.) 2. The existing land use pattern. The subject property is located in an Activity Center and lands to the east are zoned for the Tree Farm MPUD and are vacant and also located in the Activity Center. Lands to the west are . vacant and zoned for the Marisol PUD a residential planned unit development. Lands to the north are zoned agriculture and separated from these vacant lands by the project's preserve area. Lands on the south side ofImmokalee Road are zoned for the RicWand PUD, a commercial development zoned and developed for commercial uses including the Pebblebrooke PUD, a residential planned unit development. (See attached aerial photo.) The existing land use pattern is well suited for this CPUD based on existing and future conditions surrounding the property. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed CPUD rezoning will not create an isolated district and because of its location in an Activity Center, is well suited for this proposed CPUD. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing boundaries are not illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. s. Whether changed or changing conditions make tbe passage oftbe proposed amendment necessary . The subject property is zoned for agricultural use that is no longer suitable for the subject property as it is located in an Activity Center designed to meet the needs of the emerging area that represents the changed condition, Packet Page -2561- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighbolhood. This is further supported by the fact that the lands around the subject property to the northeast and west are presently vacant. The preserve area located on the northern portion of this CPUD and screening and buffering along the east and west property lines will serve to mitigate project impacts on living conditions on adjacent properties. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The results of the attached TIS indicate that there is a deficient segment on Immokalee Road that is presently a four lane road under ]-75 that needs to be widened to six lanes. The TIS and development commitments in Exhibit F require that access initially be provided from the CR 95] Extension and through the Tree Farm MPUD located to the east, until such time as ]mmokalee Road is found to be concurrent. At that time, access will be as shown on the CPUD Master Plan. The phasing of the proposed development to mitigate project impacts and to be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed project has been designed to accommodate the proposed storm water management system and the property owner has been working with the SFWMD to ensure the same through the permitting process. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air based on the proposed development standards and open space provided, 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed change is not anticipated to reduce property in the general area, Furthermore, lands to the north, east and west are vacant around the subject property at the present time. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed change will not be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property. 4/12/2011 Item 17A 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare, Furthermore, the proposed CPUD is consistent with the FLUE. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property is zoned for agriculture use that is not an appropriate zoning classification for property located in an Activity Center designed to meet the needs of urban uses in the process of developing around the subject property. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed request is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county based upon the uses and development standards proposed. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find sites for the proposed use already permitting such commercial uses. However, Activity Centers are the preferred location for new commercial uses which the subject property is located in. However, the Market Study included in this application demonstrates a need for additional commercial uses at this location, 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any ofthe range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The physical characteristics of the property including its proposed location are suitable to support the proposed CPUD rezoning. The preserve area depicted on the CPUD Master Plan will minimize the degree of site alteration and serve to minimize impacts to onsite wetlands. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County growth management plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. 11], as amended. As noted. the project is proposing to allow access only from the extension of CR 951 through the Tree Farm MPUD located to the east of the subject property until Imrnokalee Road is found concurrent (See Exhibit F.) All other facilities to support the proposed development are adequate to meet the future needs of this proposed CPUD including sewer, water and drainage facilities. Packet Page -2563- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t 18. Such other factors, standards. or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The applicant will consider other factors, standards, or criteria determined by the board of county commissioners important to the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. 4/12/2011 Item 17A PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 REV: 1 ADDIE'S CORNER CPUD PROJECT: 2006090031 Date: 4{27{09 DUE: 5{25{09 TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR ADDIE'S CORNER PUD RE-ZONING (PROJECT NO. F081 1.02) PREPARED BY: TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. 13881 Plantation Rond, Suite 11 Fort Myers, Florida 33912-4339 Certificate of Authorization #27003 239-278-3090 January 27, 2009 Packet Page -2565- 1:. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION <( II. EXISTING CONDITIONS I"- ..-- E Q) III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ...... .,.... ..-- 0 N IV. TRIP GENERATION -- N ..-- -- '<t V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION VI, FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS VII. PROJECTED CONSISTENCY AND IMPROVEMENTS VIII. CONCLUSION 4/12/2011 Item 17A 1:. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. I. INTRODUCTION TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. has conducted a traffic impact statement for the proposed Addie's Comer PUD Re-zoning on the subject site located on the north side of lmmokalee Road just to the west of its intersection with Collier Boulevard in Collier County, Florida. This report has been completed in compliance with the guidelines established by the Collier County Transportation Planning Division for developments seeking approval for a PUD Re-zoning. The location of the subject parcel is illustrated on Figure 1. The proposed Addie's Comer PUD would re-zone the subject site to allow for the construction of a maximum of 135,000 square feet of commercial floor area. This report examines the impact of the proposed PUD Re-zoning on the surrounding roadways, Trip generation and assignments to the area intersections will be completed and analysis conducted to determine the impacts of the developments on the sUlTounding intersections. A methodology meeting was held with County Staff on December 22, 2008 in order to detemline the necessary parameters of this proposed PUD Re-zoning. Attached in the Appendix of this report is the completed and agreed upon Methodology Meeting Checklist which outlines the approved traffic distribution, the intersections required for analysis, and various other requirements for this analysis. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject parcel is a 23.33-acre parcel located on the north side of lmmokalee Road just to the west of its intersection with Collier Boulevard. TIle site cUll'ently consists of vacant land, To the west and north of the site is the Mirasol PUD. The Tree Farm PUD borders the site to the east The southern boundary of the subject site is lmmokalee Road. Page I Packet Page -2567- !-'O--rll.{f"'<'~~~rT':""';;if"LI ,--,i-ejl ,".~,:;:I~o~lta;" '~l cl_t--i" :~,,#1,,_ ~....'r" if:kF-~l " "" !ipnn!;!~ __==='-.. ,: li'i ., -~=~'lo"'''''f,iCf' ""IF,-'=Cl""1 ' r----' (I ' _..-'t_;:....~, '.wd;r>:1r0\ ,.., '1 \''t ~ _.'~:c J: iLl ' ~'\,~ ,...~,~~.? \ 'II ' I 'I ~~,L.!:tl__q.-: f I II t\~t"'~_~...,"",;e-~~, 1I'~ll'ii \1..1 '1 l....-....-----.-I.~__.._. 34-1~'_'-:-' l-~~ ~ ......,,~w,' ~1Ot' ~--, t' 1 j ,I'! I ... ' j;~J~~~1''t I!---; ...-' J I ~ l!h~"f~l I ill : il ' I "'C'""" _u~____:+ 'io~ ~.~::4~~'"':"~: ~ .. - ~-~ t:\~t_~~~__.~7 -r"'~""""~F-"'-"'" -.------:-'~='J""'!lowiH5;;.vr;- ;r" ......:;~1i;;::'d~ )".AI' ) I '\.~ . . .f: i c) ~ " ,Ii 'fj " -- ~ 1.-...' -'lLj~;r,~"1 .:<1' r' I "~ ,.:i ....~:~~ 1;; ! ! ~ ,Jo ,j......\ 'II ~ r ~-::f~!~_.;~L __DOJ,' , t '! r~ ....~.1" ~:j _. .---1 ,I -,--1 c.",,/~ I _JI ::-:-9"",'" -.--, .:,:_1- .:1,\ .i ' . -'-~jL__._ " ) ~' : (341'19 ,~. t~~,w'...,~:\ j._ J " .,~. ';,r ' :''''~, ~!-i~-"~r~',~ .~- ,iSl ,;;1,,~, i' .:..::n:::"';t.1 / I ;fi;~~g~"./ ": :iJ~Ji /:.~ fJ~~n'[ r . T'}t)rt~i -i- 'l;:;:""-::'--'!"'~PROJECT SITE ;J 'l"")~ I. i '1 ;' r, , I'. !.,' ~ :>~"{"~ A ' ....vi! ',_ ! , :11.'("15 ,,: ,;/q/ '<,,.,...-.1: i(< ; : t '-..1~ \ '.}AI~:f,(i,~;'~:1~,~,t.i,o,;:~L, """""""-"Ci'1,4ir'~--~~". .;,:l - Ire 'ji' .-. , I , I ~ ',,;,_ ~~~:'r~~~i,lr:I~7~::;,Jl=~=~;i~;'~C~C'~C; ""'''_! . " t t: }_Io.:i,~ ,1)\ ..-,7----'---.-tl::-:-=t~.. fl' ;l~ '~"""~.'..~.."r...ii!c-tj, ....~,....: i j ,.. ---"\',. " , ',' I: I l"'li, . ~ I' -"'''''. - \' I ";';:' ,/~_/ ::""!L [:\ (~i i I :.1 ;' \: ~,~. r--~ t, ~B~ft; f\--~ i "1"-- --'~;- "-f.,.", :I',----~~!"- ";':, i ~ ,~ l\'-~:'!I'ji!1 I I~ -<>' ol:-l'''7'~\ \1 '~'I!, '_fl!. '" U~:,,! 34119 I, t-,~. !_ I' ' 1', """"" ': ' ., l< ~~:t::t(~'~ I i /! ",~h ::1:-.-,' -" -! ~ I \! ._::~", (~\ f-/ ,.~~~ T+ i~---'----"'-"~"~~----- -=fl u_~i.';::;I' , -,' ...., -_u_--,~-,II--~---T"' _'.< f"'::i:f'y'.....:~ '1~ f€ ii, iii 1"1 r: ,~""~~:. '},./ i'l' 'I I'~\f ~ Il \ ~l;~ l '"-.-. 1 <," ,k ,.-, 'I' i " '~l'l, .'11,1: I ' ' "'"' - J' , , i, /' -~- ,..I I Iv....,l-...u.II.UIMlwT48S J +,""......_...,~ _'0"'0'" _ -<'_ , ':~'1:~~:~1 1::';iij'~T~k~1::-t:)TIJ~= ::::'- w_ @--'-'"--~~9 S'f" < 1:"11 - - ~~:=~ ~4f +p - c( - - ; - ..~, , '" ., -/1""": : ;..:f;...~/-,~,. :~.;~ .....~;\' I :' ""''''''j"' ,..,'1" '-"O',!..,~"., "__;" "It.. ," , ",. ~<\ji) u" :~l~IClt\"-". .~.f' ~":.~, ,,",",,_,I>- .- '.' ~". ~ lff"ll-' I.~'./" ...."w.."'! . I '? p.. '1; ~; ";;. II' 'I"'" ~ r,,'.. ; r~_ _._". _L~ r: It; I ~ '. 0: ': ~ --,:: i l~""" ; "> lil . ~.:::fii !_ ~._ -,,,. ~ \;,. ~...,~.,;,., !, ",1<, Eli! - I'~ -:fiit I- Ii __~". I'" ~"\ I I <( I"- ..-- .1. E Q), ~~ ..--, ..--' A' N -- N ..-- -- '<t '""~, -, ;// Ii ... ..:.-1..:.".:.__ ----,' 109 ' --" -,~.,.;.;;;... R , . _-.....u-;.:_~._ (. . ~ ~', I I L_ , I I. ,1: '.' +'-:~--:'.-" ,I' .1 i I Iii. ,I 1$ ! j /: " , , t ir-~-,--:-, !! )'\' i '11 \ ,\ 1 , , II I ,~_ ] i;'''. '- li~ \ ~: : I .,:, t.-.ll-- II 1--." , , \ 3cl1 '19 ,~"-. '711""\/ ,~!l.,/ vr""..... f t !SrI' I ~ li:,Ii. i: ~ ""~'-""i"'l" l ;;'~'::r ~ ;,1 l I , T'" ........."."....,- -,tJr"'--:-'. ~*,~zt:.- \..A'-""'~' I'" , -,...,...... 'r; };' ":!....,.,- PROJECT LOCATION MAP ADDIE'S CORNER TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS,INC Figure 1 ,411.u ~.:~.~": .'.cct~ --'n- ji T 'I , '" ','-~..,. ''i ; \, :,j ~' 4/12/2011 Item 17A 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. lmmokalee Road is an east/west six-lane arterial roadway to the south of the subject parcel. As a part of the proposed PUD re-zoning, a directional left-in/right-inlright-out is being proposed on the western boundary of the subject site. TIle intersection of lmmokalee Road and Collier Boulevard operates under signalized conditions. TIle intersection of lmmokalee Road and Logan BoulevardlOlde Cypress Boulevard also operates under signalized conditions. hnmokaIee Road has a Level of Service Standard of LOS "D", or 3,629 vehicles, between Logan Boulevard and Collier Boulevard. and it has a Level of Service Standard of LOS "E". or 3,790 vehicles, to the east of Collier Boulevard. Immokalee Road has a posted speed limit of 45 mph and is under the jurisdiction of the Collier County Transportation Department Collier Boulevard is a north/south six-lane artedal roadway to the east of the subject site. The northern leg of the intersection of Inunokalee Road and Collier Boulevard is Broken Back Road, The subject parcel will access Broken Back Road via a cross access through the Tree Farnl PUD that borders the subject site to the east. TIle intersection of Collier Boulevard and Immokalee Road operates under signalized conditions, Collier Boulevard has a Level of Service Standard of LOS "D", or 2,450 vehicles, to tlle south of Immokalee Road. The posted speed limit on Collier Boulevard is 45 mph, and it is under the jurisdiction of the Collier County Transportation Deprutment. Logan Boulevard is a north/south arterial roadway to the west of the subject site. The intersection of Logan Boulevard with Immokalee Road operates under signalized conditions. Logan Boulevard has a Level of Service Standard of LOS "E", or 1,100 vehicles, to the south of Immokalee Road, Logan Boulevard is under the jurisdiction of the Collier County Transportation Department. In order to gain a better understanding of the traffic conditions in the vicinity of the subject developments, AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts were performed at the intersections of Immokalee Road with Logan Boulevard and Collier Boulevard, The till'ning movement counts were adjustcd for peak season conditions in accordance with the information contained within the 2007 FDOT Traffic Information CD. As slIch, Page 3 Packet Page -2569- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ,,- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. the raw turning movement count data was factored by a peak season correction of 1.09 and 1.06 in order to obtain the 2008 peak season turning movements. Figure 2 indicates the resultant 2009 peak season turning movements at the subject intersection. III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Based on the accompanYlllg PUD Master Concept Plan and schedule of uses, the proposed development could consist of a variety of commercial uses. In accordance with the Collier County TIS Guidelines, it is necessary to analyze the potential development on the subject site that will generate the highest amount of peak hour, peak direction traffic, As such, the subject parcel was considered to consist of retail uses entirely. Therefore, the site was analyzed Lo consist of a total of 135,000 square feet of commercial/retail uses, Table] indicates the use proposed on the subject parcel as a part of this PUD Re-zoning, Table] Proposed Land Use Addie's Corner PUD Land Use Shopping Center ILUC 820) Intensity 135,000 square feet Access to the site is shown via three (3) locations, A new directional left-in/right- in/right-out access is proposed along the western boundary of the subject site. Furthermore, interconnection is shown to the neighboring parcels to the west and the east The interconnection to the east through the Tree Farm PUD will provide the development with access to Broken Back Road, which intersects the County Roadway Network as the north leg of the intersection of ImmokaJee Road and Collier Boulevard, While an interconnection is also shown through the Mirasol PUD to the west of the site, it is unlikely that this interconnection will provide anything more than a means for the Mirasol residents to emer/exit the subject site. The MirasoJ PUD is slaIed to be a gated community, and the residents/Developer of the Mirasol PUD are no! likely to approve Page 4 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. s INTSI N " o n: <l: > W -' ::l o m CJ) CJ) w n: "- G w o -' o o <l: o n: >::: u <l: aJ Z w >::: o n: aJ 0; o u. I'.. I t:"M'_ '""'~'"" ~~~ ~U)- '"" '"" 00 ~t~ (53) 20'; (1,610) 603+ (151)46~ '\.14 (31) +1,795 (969) 237 (94) ....--- 0)- '\. ~ I ~~~ 1 (0) '7':I'\.-H' '""<00 +1,361 (625) IMMOKALEE ROAD ~ : + 1,~:18 (982) ~ t ~ .r 434 (342) (-).,; (22)17,;~t~ (1,452)691+ (1,052)410+ ~:2:::: (378)264..... ::.~;:::, .. co t'- o '" <D rr:: C :!. ~ -' ::l o CD n: w :J -' o u o n: :; w -' ::l o aJ Z <l: (9 o -' LEGEND + 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC +(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, tNC. 2009 PEAK SEASON TURNING MOVEMENTS ADDIE'S CORNER Figure 2 Packet Page -2571- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t 1:. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. additional commercial traffic through their community. As such, assignments were only made to the new directional access as well as Ihe interconnection to Broken Back Road through the Tree Farm PUD. IV. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation calculations were performed for the maximum proposed intensities on the subject site as indicated within Table 1. The resultant trip generation was detellnined by referencing the Institute of TranspDIiation Engineer's (ITE) repmi, titled Trip Generation, 8'h Edition. For the proposed retail use on the subject site, Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center) was utilized. Table 2 indicates the "worst case" trip generution of the proposed Addie's Corner PUD as a result of the proposed re-zoning. Table 2 Trip Generation Addie's Corner PUD Land Use A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily In Out I Total In Out Total (2-way) Shopping Center 112 72 ]84 381 397 778 8,254 (135,000 sa, tt) , ITE estimates that a Shopping Center usc such as the one proposed as a pari of this re- zoning on the subject site may attract a significant amount of its traffic from vehicles already traveling the adjoining roadway system. This Iraffic, called "pass-by" traffic, reduces the development's overall impact on the surrounding roadway system but does not decrease the actual driveway volumes, Collier County allows a maximum "pass-by" traffic reduction of 25% for bank uses. Table 3 summarizes the pass-by reduction utilized in order to account for the captured trips as a result of the subject parcel, Table 4 summarizes the net new Addie's Corner PUD traffic after accounting for the pass-by traffic reductioR It should be noted that the driveway volumes are not reduced as a result of the "pass-by" reduction, only tlle traJJic added to the sUlTounding streets and intersections. Page 6 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. "t. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. Table 3 Pass-by Trip Reduction Factor Addie's Corner PUD , 'c ." , . " , '..'~~f~~~\~~~,,~~ip.'.', , ;.;:~"~~~:P~r;:.: , " .c- , ,,,,,,;:;,,:R~i.!llct!!!!L,,,.,;,,, Shopping Center 25 % .'., . , , . . Land Use .. :\,' .... ' Total Trins Less Retail Pass-by (25% of Rctail Trips) Table 4 Trip Generation - New Trips Addie's Corner PUD Weekdlly AlV1 Peak Hour ,:W cekdlly)>1YI Pellk Hour In Out Total In Out Total 112 72 184 381 397 778 -23 -23 -46 -97 -97 - 194 DlIily (2-wllY) 8,254 -2,064 New Traffic (falnl Trips Pass.bv Trame) 89 49 138 284 300 584 6,190 V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The net new trips generated as a result of the proposed Addie's Comer PUD indicated within Table 4 were then assigned to the surrounding roadway system based on the anticipated routes the drivers will utilize to approach the site, The resultant traffIc distribution of the Addie's Corner PUD as approved in the methodology meeting is indicated in Figure 3. Based on the distribution of the site traffic indicated within Figure 3, the total trips and the net new project traffic were assigned to the SUlTowlding intersections and site access driveways, Figure 4 reflects the assignment of the project generated traffic to the adjacent intersections as a result of the proposed Addie's Comer PUD, It should be noted that the assignment of the site traffic at the site access driveway to lmmokalee Road reflects the total traftic generated as a result of the proposed development, while the assignments at the Immokalee Road/Logan Boulevard and Immokalee Road/Collier Boulevard intersections reflect the net new project traffic shown within Table 4 above. Furthennore, an assignment of the net new trips as a result of the proposed re-zoning are Page 7 Packet Page -2573- 0 a: ~ w -' 0 S ::J 0 <C w 0 INUI l/) a: l/) ~ w 0 a: <C 0- W >- Z <.( 0 w w '" I"- 0 0 ..- -' n:: 0 ro E IDN .:::C! .uj ..-~ i ,- '" ..- 0 +25%+ +35%+ IMMOKALEE ROAD L, ......1 +20%+ 0'" N +45%+ -- N ..-- -- '<t t t t "' /'- -' 5% 10% 30% + + + 0 0 0 n: n: n: ~ ~ <C > W W W -' -' -' ::J ::J ::J 0 0 0 ro <D <Il n: (f) z w w <C ::; >t: 0 -' <( 0 0 0 -' U VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD + 5% + t 20% + LEGEND +20%+ PERCENT DISTRIBUTION * 5 % OF PROJECT TRAFFIC WAS ASSUMED TO BE CAPTURED AS A RESULT OF THE SHARED ACCESS WITH NEIGHBORING RESIDENTIAL PARCELS, 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ADDIE'S CORNER Figure 3 0 I:t:: ~ ..J N :::> q 0 ~ ro "' (/) '" "- (/) UJ I:t:: "- >- 0 UJ 0 ..J 0 ~e:e: "-0 (0) 000 +16(100) .-'"'~ +5 (30) (0)0; ~t~ (94) 30+ 000> (O)O~ Saro- .........--~ 0 I:t:: <C > ill ..J :::> 0 ro z <C (!) 0 ..J 4/12/2011 Item 17A S IN.T.S,j o <C o a: ~ o <C o:l Z ill ~ o a: o:l -, r , r o;i 1-0___ t-l! 0_ ~l I -.0>0 "'--j I a-to ~:1"-32(108) ;;~;; +16(51) IMMOKAlEE ROAD ., : ~.9(Q) .-' "' ~ 0 (0) (154)45; (12)4;~ t ~ (12)4+ (0)0+ ~~'::. {OJ 0.... SG>2. ... "'In o -- a: ~ ill -' ::> o o:l a: ill :J -' o o LEGEND + 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC +(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC * THE TURNING MOVEMENTS AT THE IMMOKALEE ROAD! LOGAN BOULEVARD & IMMOKALEE ROAD! COLLIER BOULEVARD INTERSECTIONS REFLECt THE NET NEW PROJECT TRIPS WHILE THE ENTERING! EXITING TRAFFIC AT THE SITE ACCESS DRIVEWAYS REFLECT TOTAL SITE TRAFFIC, l:.. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ADDIE'S CORNER Packet Page -2575- Figure 4 <( I"- ..-- ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t !. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. E Q) ...... illustrated within Figure lA of the Appendix of this report. Figure] A was determined by assigning the total project traffic indicated within Table 2 to the adjacent intersections, and subtracting an assignment of the pass-by traffic indicated within Table 4, As a result, Figures 3A & 4A reflect an assignment of the total site ll'affic and the pass-by traffic, respectively. The volumes indicated within Figure IA were determined by subtracting the traffic indicated within Figure 4A from the tuming movements indicated within Figure 3A. VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In order to detem1ine which roadway segments surrounding the site will be significantly impacted as a result of the proposed Addie's Comer PUD, Table lA, contained in the Appendix, was created. Table 1 A indicates which roadway links wil] accommodate an amount of project traffic greater than the 2%-2%-3% Significance Test due to the net new Addie's Comer PUD traffic. The new traffic generated as a result of the proposed development was compared with the corrected ] a-month Level of Service Standard for Peak Hour - Peak Direction traffic conditions in order to determine the project impact percentage. The I a-month Level of Service Standard was taken from the 2008 Collier County Annual Update Inventory RepDl1 (AUIR). Based on the information contained within Table ]A, lmmokalee Road, Collier Boulevard, and Logan Boulevard will be significantly impacted as a result of the net new Addie's Corner PUD in accordance with the Collier County 2%-2%-3% Significance Test. Therefore, Lcvel of Service consistency analysis was performed on lmmokalee Road, Collier Boulevard and Logan Boulevard, and the lmmokalee Road/Collier Boulevard and ImmokaJee Road/Logan Boulevard intersections were analyzed as a pan of this report In addition to the significant impact criteria, Table lA also includes a buildout consistency analysis on the Collier County Roadway network, The Collier County TIS Guidelines require analysis of the adjacent roadway network based on the five (5) year Pnge 10 4/12/2011 Item 17A 1: TRANSPORTATION K CoNSULTANTS, INC. planning window. Therefore, it was necessary to analyze the surrounding roadway network based on the projected 2014 traffic conditions. The total volume indicated within the 2008 Collier County AUIR reflects the current remaining capacity on the adjacent roadway network. The remaining capacity was subtracted from the IO-month service volume on each roadway in order to detem1ine the 2008 peak season, peak hour, peak direction traffic volume on the adjacent roadway network. The appropriate annual growth rate for these roadways was taken from the 2007 Collier County Average Daily Traffic Report. An example of the calculations to determine the annual growth rates can be found within the Appendix of this report for reference. A minimum annual growth rate of 2,0% was assumed for any roadways shown to experience declining or minimal growth in accordance wit\! the Collier County TIS Guidelines. These annual growth rates were then used to factor the 2008 peak season, peak hour, peak direction traffic volume to 20 J 4 peak season, peak hour, peak direction background traffic conditions. The resultant 2014 peak season, peak hour. peak direction traffic volume was subtracted from the Level of Service Standard in order to deteImine the remaining capacity in the year 2014, TIle project generated traffic was then subtracted from the remaining capacity in order to determine the remaining 2014 capacity after the new traffic from the Addie's Corner PUD is added to the surrounding roadway network, A summary of the results of the consistency analysis are illustrated within Figure 5 for reference, VH. PROJECTED CONSISTENCY AND IMPROVEMENTS Based upon the infom1ation contained within Table I A and Figure 5, the only roadway link shown to fail under the 20 1 4 buiJdout traffic conditions is the section of Immokalee Road to the west of Logan Boulevard. This section of Immokalee Road is a six-lane aI1erial roadway, but the Collier County AUIR indicates the section of lmmokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard as a' four-lane divided roadway, This is the result of the Collier County Board of Counly Commissioner's direction due to the Page 11 Packet Page -2577- ~ I"- ..- E ID", ::~ ..--;;; ..--0 a'" N -- N ..-- -- '<t '" IT 1:. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. o ex: 5 w --' ::> o !D (f) W ~ <{ o o ex: 5 w .J => o !D (f) (f) w ex: 0- r o w o ..J o -542 (-573) [-647J 4,5% IMMOKALEE ROAD 1,747 J (1,707) [1.612J o 3,7% ex: <{ > W ..J => o aJ Z (1j \ 700 g L(691) [670J 2,7% 519 (492) [429J 3,7% r"" I - i o <{ o ex: ~ o <{ !D Z W ~ o 0:: !D 1,747 J (1,715) [1,639J 3,0% VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD LEGEND 000 2014 BACKGROUND REMAINING CAPACITY (000) 2014 REMAINING CAPACITY AFTER AM PROJECT TRAFFIC [OOOJ 2014 REMAINING CAPACITY AFTER PM PROJECT TRAFFIC 0,0% PROJECT IMPACT PERCENTAGE L. ...i S INTS,I o 0:: ;; W --' ::> o !D 0:: UJ :J --' o o 1,747 J (1,724) [1,682J 1,6% 2014 BUilD-OUT CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS ADDIE'S CORNER Figure 5 4/12/2011 Item 17A t.. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. narrowing oflmmokalee Road to four-lanes underneath the 1-75 overpass. Construction is currently on-going to widen this section of Immokalee Road. As a result, this roadway will consist of six-lanes prior to the build-out of the proposed development. Based on the capacity of the adjacent sections of Immokalee Road, it is likely that Irnrnokalee Road will function acceptably in the year 2014 once the four-lane section under the 1-75 overpass is widened to six-lanes, Intersection analysis was performed as a result of the added traffic associated with the proposed Addie's Corner PUD, Intersection analysis was required at the site access driveway to Immokalee Road in addition to the Immokalee Road/Collier Boulevard and ImmokaJee Road/Logan Boulevard intersection. In order to perform the required intersection analysis, it was necessary to determine the 2014 background peak hour turning movements at these intersections, Therefore, the 2009 peak season turning movements indicated within Figure 2 were factored by the appropriate annual growth rates over a five (5) year period. The calculation to determine the background turning movements is indicated below: 20 J 4 Turning Movement = (2009 Turning Movement)* (I + A G R )1'.14-1009) 2014 Turning Movement = (1,795 veh)*(1 +0.0200Y'l 2014 Turning Movemenf = (1,795 veh)*(1.l04) 20]4 Turning Movemenf = 1,982 vehicles TIle above illustrated calculation was applied to all of the turning movements indicated within Figure 2 in order to detennine the 20 1 4 background turning movements. TIle resultant 2014 background turning movements are illustrated within Figure 6, The site traffIc indicated within Figure 4 was then added to the 20 J 4 background turning movements in order to detemline the 2014 buildout turning movements at the area intersections. The resultant 2014 buildout turning movements are indicated within Figure 7. The appropJiate lane an'angements and the turning movements indicated within Figure 6 were inputted into the HCS+ and SYNCHRO software in order to perform the necessary Page 13 Packet Page -2579- <( I"- ..-- E Q) ...... ..-- ..-- o N -- N ..-- -- '<t N~.- <t)~"<I' --~ "<1'0>- '" '" 0> .-I+~ (56) 22 .I' (1,778)666+ (167)51~ 1:.. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. S INTS,I o 0:: <t: > UJ -' ::J o ro C/) C/) UJ 0:: 0- r u UJ o -' o o <( o 0:: 0<: o <( In Z W 0<: o 0:: In i-- >- -- ") I I '\..15 (34) +1,982 (1,070) +262 (104) ~t~ <0,,," ~~I"- ~-~ -"'- O>NI"- "'-~ ::.. :!. ---- I N_.. _1 i "''''- '-1 (0) DI 1 -~~ ;;!I'\.. 0 (0) 1ii;;;; +1,503 (690) IMMOKALEE ROAD ~ j ~.?,.o08 (1,084).-1 + ~ +479 (378) (0) 0.1' (24) 19 ~ t ~ (1,602)762+ (1,116)452+ 18~~ (417) 291..... ::.~:: .. N (0 o (0 ~ 0: e e <t: > w -' ::0 o In 0:: UJ ::J -' o o o ct: :; UJ -' ::J o m z <t: Cl o -' LEGEND + 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC +(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 2014 BACKGROUND TURNING MOVEMENTS ADDIE'S CORNER Figure 6 N ~ ~ " "- N~_ U)~~ --~ ,,"'- "H'"'' ~...~ (56)22.7 (1,872)696+ (167) 51 "'\- o 0:: ~ -' ::> o co C/) C/) ill 0:: [L >- (.) ill o -' o o 0:: :;; ill -' ::> o 0::> Z <( (? o -' "\..15 (34) '-1,998 (1.170) ,{'267 (134) ~+,A <O~l'- ~~CO ~-~ -"'- ",,,,U) "'-'" s :::.. 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS. INC. 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. S IN,T.S,I Cl <( o n:: ;.:: u <( to Z W ;.:: o n:: to i 0)1 - - ~M 1'-1 . NO......... .... ::::.: ; e::::'[2l '-2 (6) ~~1"\..32(108) ~N~ '-1,519(741) IMMOKALEE ROAD ~ i :'t:'.?098 (1.084)~ ... ~,{'479 (378) (154) 45.J' (36) 23.J' ~ + ,A (1,614)766+ (1,116)452+ ~~~ (417) 291 " ~;::-:, .. NtoID o en.........,.... 0:: '" "' :;; - - W .J :::> o II) 0:: W :J .J o U LEGEND .- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC '-(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 2014 BUilD-OUT TURNING MOVEMENTS ADDIE'S CORNER Figure 7 Packet Page -2581- <{ I"- ..- E Q) ...... ..-- ..- o N -- N ..- -- '<t 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC, intersection analysis at the previously mentioned intersections. The SYNCHRO software was utilized for the unsignalized intersection at the site access driveway due to the HCS+ software's inability to analyze unsignalized intersections on six-lane roadways. The lane arrangements utilized in this analysis can be found in graphical format in Figure 2A. It should be noted that the southbound approach to lmmokalee Road on Broken Back Road was analyzed to consist of three (3) lanes, a dedicated left tw'n lane, a through lane, and a separate right turn lane. These improvements are not solely the requirement of the Addie's Corner PUD, but will also benefit the Tree Farm PUD and any other developments with access to Broken Back Road, As such, the Addie's Corner PUD Developer will only be responsible for a proportionate share of the costs of these approach improvements, The results of the intersection capacity analyses can be found in the Appendix of this report as well as indicated within Table 5 below. Immokalee Rd @ Site Access Table 5 I nlerscetion Analysis Results Addie's Corner PUD ,,~'., ,.</,',,"; :;?iOjJj'tiO$'fDeiii', :t(*1ili1:f~i1Jr9jie2"'j j' ,ie', ....'iiM,J>.~~l1lI~Uf..',' /;B~k1!g!;;~p:~~l' f:'~~II~iliH:;; i}!i,~fii'gr.9~Ji!!;i[~lii@im.", LOS D LOS D LOS D LOS D (47.3 see) 48.7 see) (52.1 see) (51.4 see) LOS C LOS B (24.6 see (J 4.9 see) LOS C LOS B (l5.9scc) (13.7 see) LOS C LOS C LOS D (24.9 &cc) (34.9 see) (39.1 see) Immokalee Rd & Collier Blvd EB Left SB Approach Airp0l1 Rd @ Site Access LOS C (24.6 see) Based on the results of the intersection analysis listed above, all intersections and turning movements are shown 10 operate acceptably after the addition of the Addie's Corner PUD traffic. Therefore, beyond any potential turn lane improvements, no intersection improvements will be required as a part of the proposed Addie's Comer PUD. It should be noted that an eastbound left turn lane on lmmokalee Road at the new directional left- in/right-inlright-out access will be required, Furthermore, a westbound right tUl11 lane will also be required at this location. However, the turn lane lengths at these locations will be reviewed at the Site Development Plan (SOP) phase when more specific development parameters are available, Page J 6 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. l::.. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. VIII. CONCLUSION The proposed Addie's Comer PUD Re-zoning may result in roadway Level of Service deficiencies on Immokalee Road to the west of Logan Boulevard. However, it is unlikely that this roadway will continue to fail once the on-going construction on Immokalee Road to widen the roadway from its existing four-lanes to six-lanes under the 1-75 overpass, Based on the capacity of the adjacent roadway segments oflmmokalee Road, a six-lane Immokalee Road should be able to sufficiently can)' the amount of traffic projected on this roadway during the 20 I 4 buiJdout year based on the analysis contained within this report. Preliminary intersection analysis was perfonned as a part of this report based on the worst case trip generation indicated as a part of the proposed Addie's Corner PUD, Based on the analysis contained within this report, no intersection deficiencies are projected as a result of the traffic added as a part of the proposed re-zoning, However, it should be noted that improvements to the Broken Back Road approach to Immokalee Road will be required as this roadway currently consists of a single travel lane. The likely improvements at this intersection include the addition of a separate left turn lane and a separate right tUl11 lane, These lanes will be required not only as a result of the proposed Addie's Comer PUD, but also as a result of the Tree Farm PUD and the developments located in the northeast cornel' of the subject intersection. As such, the Addie's Corner Developer will likely be required to pay a proportionate share of any improvements to the southbound approach at this intersection in order to mitigate the impacts of the development. Regardless, the impacts of the development on the Collier BoulevardlImmokalee Boulevard/Broken Back Road intersection will be reviewed once again at the SDP phase when .a more specific development scenario is available on the subject site, The Developer will also be responsible for tUlU lane improvements at the new site access driveway to Iml110kalee Road to be detennined at the SDP phase, Page J 7 Packet Page -2583- <( I'-- ..- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- "'" APPENDIX METHODOLOGY MEETING CHECKLIST Packet Page -2585- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. <( I'-- ..- Date: 12/22/2008 Til11e: 9 AM E Ql == Location: Collier County Transportation ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- "'" People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone NUl11bers 1) Robert Price. PE TR Transportation Consultants. Inc. (239) 278-3090 2) Collier County Transportation Staff 3) Studv PrepareI': Preparer's Name and Title: Robert Price. FE. Senior Transportation Consultant Organization: TR Transportation Consultants. Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 13881 Plantation Road. Suite 11. Ft. Mvers. FL 33912 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Greene and John Podczerwinskv Collier County Transportation Planning Department Applicant: Applicant's NamelRepresentative: Hole Montes_ Inc, Address: 950 Encore Way. Naples. FL 34l 10 Telephone Number: (239) 254-2000 Proposed Development: Name: Addie's Comer PUD Location: North side oflmmokalee Road. iust west of Collier Boulevard Land Use Type: Retail/Shopping Center ITE Code #: Land Use Code 820 Proposed number of development units: ] 20.000 square feet Other: Description: Access to Immokalee Road as well as through neighboring parcel to the east ofthesubiectsite. ~ 't-kJ J;;lS ~MDITI.:>""5 O~"i1-lf: ,11'11"" OF ,';;"'~'s C.!';lJ1ECT1oN ",VIS ro -n:-r,,v6 CF IMllClI!ALGG ICe>4i> rN"6tCu~IV6E,:. 8. 'Af'ci2.':e;c.:rrQIJ C""~M"MdS'''''''''"'''''opITM''''.'''''''_"m'''',g""."_~'od''M'''''''''A,"" IH-I'to~~/:s..' ~ Zoning Existing: Comprehensive plan recommendation: _ Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: Study Type: Minor TIS Small Scale TIS 0 Major TIS [SJ fP o Study Area: Boundaries: 2%-2%-3% Significance Test Additional intersections to be analyzed:~ 1i<'tWlbitaii.!(@ C R :75( , . JM>H.c>i~fM Q Loc\q,n Honzon Year(s): 2014 for conslstencv J Analysis Time Period(s): AM & PM peak hours Future Off-Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: lTE Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: N/A Pass-by trips: 25% based on Collier Coun Guidelines Internal. trips (PUD):~ 5 ~\ ~-rot~ lx~eV1 ~:S;lIt use: (JS~ ofo (3teh pvoJ'-ecJ) Horizon Year Roadwav Network Improvements: ll11mokalee Road as 6-lanes at 1-757 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. /f M\Vl{~-d\ '<l-N<<. rutVI'\. PlJV5 ~ Metbodolol!V & Assumptions: Non-site traffic estimates: 2008 Collier County AUIR Site-trip generation: ITE Trip distribution method: By Hand Traffic assignment method: By Hand Traffic growth rate: 2007 Collier County Traffic Count Report or l110st recent ~~~'}:> .----<CL:6 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: _ Queuing: _ C.1Docum~8ndS,Uilgs~plTemplil!&'Mellllldo/O!lYmeelmp~_,e-W:sm1rlmtIIEJIl~/UJIY. Packet Page -2587- ~.~~ <( I'-- ..- E OJ ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- "'" Access location & configuration: Traffic control: Signal system location & p, On-site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study re rts: Access po' y and jurisdiction: _ Review rocess: Req . 'ements: _ , cellaneous: ~ /fr' 1 Small Scale Study - No Fee _ Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 X 1f Includes 2 intersections If Additional Intersections - $500.00 each AI/lees will be agreell to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign-off on tlze application. ~ Robert 1. Price, P - Study Preparer Applicant C.\DtQm1Mls Md Seljjllgs\rlplDenlop\1l1l11p1.1ruV~B1IJDdolDgy ml'f(l/iIl!l ruq~"I'~_ot'l'i$pd III wJJb b:hibfi MOl; oi.- l 7:),7 A \...,~ "\ "", "", i~ : 1 : 1 f\~\ ir.;) u :\\\ i~ n nj! ! It '" I ~~ (91rBlf:>> avo~ _331V>1OWWl f~ : '_ ~.. ~~~::~:~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~: -; b ~~~:: ~~______~::~_.._.~~._._-- J! ~l "JVN'>':) ,...." 0. << cC f- 1\ . 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. ('l'f~ oj.QI ~~ "'~" o~,. ~ ~81!1 i 2iilI I>....i "'. ",. <,. ~~ %S ~Y1 ----- ---- ! ~ . tJ ,," i w .i. ~. I~ ! w!i >-;-8 ~ ~!,'-' '. ;;!~n..l!; ~~ ~ .~~~~.!=i < =...~i_. ~ z < ...J 0- oc w ocf- w'" z< oc~ 00 U:> "'0- wU iSl o <SJ f- 1i'i I >< w ~ 11 r I ~ ~ =::~gli!~=::::.~ ll: Is _...;.....~..::;..I! >-. '" ~ ~ ~~~i=~~il ~ ~ ~ .:--,-.:..0I0:I1II';:::l ~ . :::,..,.. : f:: t ..:.........o:IQ.... ~ " . \ [J= \: U , " oc i f- \ , \ \ CJCJCJCJCJ I' ~ l? ", ,-"" ';""""""'.""-"":""1 , I . c J .,.,- 9 . g . , ~$ 5 < Packet Page -2589- :<)0.).>/>10>1-)>)::-> i~i~~~i~i ;..jo~i>;.lo-:;':'::-' I:;~t>titt;\:;t.... gI!iH~~~5~ ~ ~ < . ~ ~Il! :I:~I! <( I'-- ..- E Q) :!::: ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- "'" ~ " '" .5 c o ~ ~ .. =- f ~ 0 ; v ~ i j ~ , ~~~ I g$~ ... ~~~ I~~ ~.~ ~::!i "'""w ~<{ ON'" g;z~g~,., "~Q!~!O !~:cZ ;:;Wc> ::>::r;gool~~~ Z.a.1!_O;:;:; .2 EC::-t:'!- ;E:8,;;~?;g \\ ~ "\ ~"'" ~ o o ~ c; N ~ ~ o ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ , I i . . i ;;: " >- " . E '" ~ ~ ;j j ! ~ ~ ci ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " "" x " . '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;: ;:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " '; 'r; ~, ~ ::: N o ~ :;; ~ "' ~ ~ ~ l > I I , ~ i , i , , j i . , o . ! ! l . I i I 8 , } r ~ ~ , v . , v : ~ J : ~ , 1 > ! , 8 r ~ E ~ ~ <' I- ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ E 8 ~. '. "- :;- g "8 " ~ ~ 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. TABLEIA Packet Page -2591- w .. " I: i w z '" w 13 w w w w w 13 0 ~ ~ :i" w ~ w w " " > z > ~ ~ ~ ~ q ~ u ~ w !< ~ ~ . ~ N .. ~ R I: " N ~ " Z ~ U v ~ w ~ 13 t w q < 0 ~ ~ < ~ ~ N ~ " E ~ w q ~ ~ R ~ . ~ u . w " '" ~ ~ z ~ u Z .. N " " ~ R ~ w ;; ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w . ~ " '" ~ <t; z z w Z ~ w w ~ N ~ ~ " ;; ~ N ~ ~ I'-- ~ ~ ~ W ..- U ~ E " z ~ Q) z ~ ..- ~ !!! w ..- .J 0 <( ~ z N <( 0 w ~ . . . . ~ -- g w " 0 w N ~ ~ " .. M " - '" 0 . ..- z -- LU "'" OC " u ~I . ~ . ~ ~ ~ "'Cl u ~ " w Z"'Z " 0 ~ ~I ~ N ~ 00- ~ '" ~ . ZZ . . >=O~ " " i 00, z u LUO<SLU w w . ~ ~ . . ~<!o:: u 0 g 0 e " " N W '" <(0-0 . . ......:::s:::c::::=t W<c~c.. w " II z .....JW-n:: ~ ~ " ~ ~ i N W 0 tOo..O:::W 0 ~ '" ~ ~ 0 <t ~UZ N ~ ~ ~ ~ U . .-0::'1-0:: m 5 "'00 < 0<(0 ~ ~ f "'0. q E -~ ~ . . . . . "':;;!" ~ o " ~ 8 8 8 8 u z . <(-LU z ~ N wl-O ~ '" ~ o.ZO u ~ ~ (}<( ~ " . ~ . w ~ g " " " " ~ ~ l ;:;; < ~ ~ . ~ , Z " . Cl , " , . en " " I :; ! ~ ~ 0 0 w 0 " . . ~ ~ 1 ! '" 0 . ~ ~ N '? ~ ~ ~ " i .. ~ ~ "" w . i ~ "I "" ~ ; . . ~ ~ g ~ N , " 0 0 9 0 0 3 , , 0 ~ " " " g . v W N ! t ~ -j " s I z w eI - N N . Iii r s g ~ " ~ v '" . I z z w !'> !'> w . , w ~ , ! ~ . " " I u u " " " ~ ~ " ~ . , g g " ~ ~ " ~ I ~ I 1 ,. . ,. " " "' .. ~ u u II j . . . ~ f w w ~ '. jj "0 ~ 0 0 w u u -' ; '" " '0 '0 '0 .. '0 '0 ~ ~ , " " " . < ~ ~ '" w " 1': ~ 0 z z , ~ ~ " E w ! ~ ~ . . ~ , II "0 I ~ . . ~ .. .. .. q W Q)N .J ::J :=c: 0 ..- ~ co ~ CJ) ..- " O~ CJ) w N 0:: -- "- N >- ..- () -- "'" w 0 .J 0 SSe: g t ~o, '" .L ro .,. 2!. o n:: ..: > w .J ::J o co z <( (9 o .J 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. S INTSI o ..: o 0:: >:: o ..: CD z w >:: o 0:: CD I I I 01 - - - - '\.0 (0) ~: ' 8aig '\.1 (6) +16(100) ;::;:1'\.26(81) ;;~;; +16(51) .r5 (30) IMMOKALEE +21 (130) ~: ~9JQ) ~ + '+. ,,"0 (0) +17 (57) ~ t ~ ROAD (122)39+(110)35; (12)4;~ t ~ (60)9+ 000, (12)4+ (0)0+ ~~~ S:S:~ (0) 0.... 8;;;-2- .. ee LEGEND + 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC +(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC g t -" ';2 N .L "' .,. 2 o n:: <( > W .J ::J o CD n:: w :J .J o () NET NEW SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ADDIE'S CORNER Figure 1A '" C> D 0:: ~ ...J :J o al (J) (J) W 0:: (L >- o W D ...J o ;;; '" u. D 0:: ;;; W ...J ::J o al Z <( (!) o ...J 1:. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. IMMOKALEE ROAD :1' .-':i_ ; ! 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. s INTSI D <( o 0:: >:: o <( al Z W >:: o 0:: al i ,--- t ; : .-'+~ f :f ~t~ +- wo:: CHANNELIZED..... ~~ RIGHT TURN ... Wf- D Z:c ~ ~Q > :cn:: W 0 ...J ::J o OJ 0:: W :J ...J o o LANE ARRANGEMENTS ADDIE'S CORNER Packet Page -2595- Figure 2A ~ 0 I'-- a:: ..- :; E UJ -' Q) ::0 ~ 0 CD ..- rJJ ..- (f) 0 UJ N a:: -- [L N >- ..- 0 -- UJ "'" 0 -' 0 e:SS o a:: <( > w -' ::0 o CD Z <( ~ o -' T TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. s IN.T,S,I o <( o a:: "" o <( CD Z W "" o a:: CD I Ci}1 io--o - -0;.-. ... t'- I ~'" .. '- 0 (0) S: , o<=.t::.... 2 (8) +25(139) i:i:''\..32 (108) ;;'gf;! +20(68) ,r7 (40) IMMOKALEE +32 (179) .,,: ~9_(Q) ~ ... ~.r0 (0) +22 (76) ~t~ ROAD (171)50+(154)45.? (17)5..J'~t~(79)14+ 00_ (17)5+ (0)0+ ~~~ e.S: (0) 0.... o~e. ~ ... ~t:::.. LEGEND + 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC +(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC TOTAL TRIP ASSIGNMENT ADDIE'S CORNER ~ t ~ '" ~'" N _ + ~ o a:: :; w -' ::0 o m a:: w :J -' o o Figure 3A 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. S INTS,I N '" Cl c:: ~ ...J :::> o CO (/) (/) w c:: [L >- o w Cl ...J o Cl <l: o c:: :>:: o <l: <D Z w :>:: o c:: <D ;;; o "- +9(39) (39)9+ e:e:s 000 .-'...~ (O)oJ (39)9+ (0)0. '\..0 (0) +9(39) .{"2 (10) IMMOKALEE +11 (49) ~ t ~ ROAD (49)11+ 00", 000 --~ -' m' ""tl 1 .........1 ! ;::1'\.6 (27) ~:~9'!Q) (44)10J (5)1+ ....--- e:~::. '\..1 (2) 01'-'" +4(17) .-' ... ~.{"O (0) +5 (19) (5)1J~ t ~ (19)5+ (0) 0+ ~~;:, (0)0. ~~s. ~ t -", N_ ...~ ~ t -I'- I'- _ ... ~ Cl c:: ~ W ...J ::J o co z <l: o o ...J Cl c:: <l: > W ...J :::> o <D c:: w ::J ...J o o LEGEND + 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC + (000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS,INC. PASS-BY TRIP ASSIGNMENT ADDIE'S CORNER Packet Page -2597- Figure 4A <i I'-- ..- E Q) := ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- "'" TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT RESULTS 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS,INC. DATE: DAY: COUNT TIME: January 21, 2009 WEDNESDAY 1;00 AM . 9:00 AM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS LOGAN BOULEVARD I OLDE CYPRESS BOULEVARD & IMMOKALEE ROAD LOGA.N BOULEVARD I OLOE CYPRESS BOULEVARD IMMOKAtEE ROAD INTER- 1i5MIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL. LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT iOTAL TOTAL 7:00AM 17 7 95 "' 3 5 7 15 , '" " '" 50 38' , 4ZO 80' 7:15AM " , " 50 3 . 6 18 , ", \0 127 " "3 7 5" 716 7:30AM J5 0 18 " 1 13 . '3 7 89 11 \07 72 '''' , 510 59' 7:45AM " 3 17 43 1 , 7 " , 138 , '" " 4Z6 , '" 885 B:OOAM 30 1 13 " . 11 14 3< 11 128 . 146 60 41Z 7 479 703 B:15AM Z8 , " " , 6 10 " 11 160 15 188 " '35 7 490 741 8:30AM 4S , 17 71 , , 11 17 11 '68 " 193 59 368 , 432 713 8:45AM 3' 10 13 " 3 3 17 Z3 " '" " m '6 331 5 372 631 TOTAL: '38 34 '09 481 Z7 57 81 165 66 1,157 110 1.333 427 3.239 37 3703 5.682 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS LOGAN BOULEVARD I OLDE CYPRESS BOULEVARD & IMMOKALEE ROAD HOUR LO BOUL.EVARD} OLD CYPRESS BOULEVARD (MMOKALEE ROAD INTER. BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEfT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL. LEFT 71iRU RIGHT TOTAl T07AL 7:00AM " 12 152 '63 , 33 29 70 19 559 " 631 '" 1,~93 13 1,930 2,894 7;15I>M "' 6 70 188 " " 36 " Z8 '" 36 5" 23' 1.737 IB 1,999 2,795 7:30AM 116 6 60 182 16 36 40 92 34 511 " 58' 231 1,709 IB 1,958 2,820 7;45 AM 126 15 61 '0' 17 27 " 86 38 580 '6 674 '18 1.541 " 1,980 2,842 8:00AM 139 zz 57 'IB 19 " 52 95 47 588 67 70' '0' 1,546 2' 1773 2,768 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR BEGIN 7: p.J.Ii LEfT 19 EASTBOUND THRU RIGHT 569 43 WESTBOUND TOl AL LEFT THRU RIGH 631 224 1,593 13 TOTAL 1,930 INTER- SECTION TOTAl 2,594 LEFT " L N BOULEVARD OLOE CYPRESS BOULEVARD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND HRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL 12 1~ m B ~ ~ ro IMMOKALEE ROAD PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = 1.06) HOUR BEGIN 7:00AM LEFT '0 EASTBOUND THRLJ RIGHT 603 4C WESTBOUND TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT 659 237 1.795 14 TOTAL 2.046 INTER- SECTION TOTAL ! 3.068 LEFT 105 LOGAN BOULEVARD I OLDE CYPRESS BOULEVARD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL 13 161 m 8 ~ 31 74 IMMOKALEE ROA-D Packet Page -2599- 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. DATE: January 21, 2009 DAY: WEDNESDAY COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM INTERSECTION: LOGAN BOULEVARD I OLDE CYPRESS BOULEVARD & IMMOKALEE ROAD LOGAN BOULEVARD I OLDE CYPRESS BOULEVARD <( 121 I'-- 4% ..- t I E Q) ...... 7' 47 N ..- I t ..- 0 N -- N 31 35 8 ..- .,J 1 ~ -- "'" IMMQKALEE ROAD ~ 14 .... ... +- 1,930 1,795 ~ j r 237 2,046 2,599 20 ....... 65% .... 603 ... 2,819 ... 92% 669 46 "\ 773 ., t ,. 105 13 '61 ~ Total Intersection TraffIc Percents (%) represent movement volumes 3,068 divided by the lotallnlernection lraffic I t 3'8 279 t 597 19% 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, lNC. DATE: DAY; COUNT TIME.; January 21, 2009 WEDNESDAY 4:00 PM . 6:00 PM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS LOGAN BOULEVARD I OLDE CYPRESS BOULEVARD & IMMOKALEE ROAD lOGAN BOULEVARD f aLOE CYPRESS BOULEVARD lMMOKALEE ROAD lNTER. 15MIN NORTHBOUND soumeOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEn THRU RIGHT TOTAl LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAl. 4:00PM 27 5 50 B2 , 3 , 15 10 327 " 365 " '" 5 285 747 4:15PM " " .0 97 , , 11 " 15 3SO " "3 " Z57 1 "7 '" 4:30PM 15 , '9 71 6 2 " 27 15 3" " 3119 27 '" 1 277 754 4:45PM '0 1 " " 3 7 , 14 14 'Z4 29 267 30 251 , 292 ." 5:00PM ZB 2 73 103 , , 11 20 17 367 41 '" Z2 Z14 , 241 799 5:15PM 32 , 101 139 1 3 1B 22 13 ,OS 31 453 23 '7' . 310 '" S:30PM 37 7 ,. 133 , 4 . 13 14 352 41 '07 ZB '28 5 '61 '14 5:45PM 22 5 .. 171 3 0 10 13 . 30' 29 ". " 19' 10 '20 780 TOTAL: 207 " '64 .15 " ZB " '40 104 2,765 '66 3,135 71' 191e 41 2,173 6.2'72 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS LOGAN BOULEVARD I OLOE CYPRESS BOULEVARD & IMMOKALEE ROAD LOGAN BOULEVMO J OLOE CYPRESS BOULEVARD IMMOKAlEE ROAD INTER. HOUR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAl LEFT "THRU RIGHT "TOtAl lEF"T THRU RIGHT TOTAl TOTAl 14:00 PM 66 24 '07 319 2Z 17 " " 54 t,246 '" 1,424 125 1,004 12 1,141 ',965 4:15PM .. 71 230 340 22 " 45 " ., t,2116 137 1,484 '06 977 " 1,097 3.007 ./1:30PM " 15 271 362 14 17 52 63 S9 1,345 130 1,534 '02 998 20 1,120 3,119 4:45PM 117 16 311 '" " 19 36 .. 59 1,352 142 1,552 \03 .77 " 1,104 3,169 5:00PM "' 20 351 ,.. " 12 44 .. 50 1,519 14' 1,711 " '14 29 1,032 3.307 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR LOGAN BOULEVARD I LOE CYPRESS BOULEVARD IMMOKAlEE ROAD INTER- BEGIN, NORTHBOUND SOUlHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION lEFT THRU RIGHT TOtAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL lEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL lEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 15:00 PM "' 20 35T ". 12 12 " " 50 1;51e 14' 1711 " '" Z9 1.032 3.307 PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = 1,06) HOUR BEGIN LOGAN BOULEVARD I OlDE CYPRESS BOUlEV NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOtAL ~ ~e ~ 13 13 47 n IMMOKALEE ROAD LEFT 5:00PM 126 LEFT 53 EASTBOUND THR,U RIGHT 1,610 151 WESTBOUND TOTAL LEFT lHRU RIGHT 1.814 94 9fl9 31 TOTAl 1,094 INTER_ SECTION TOTAl 3,505 Packet Page -2601- l:::.. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. <C I'-- ..- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- '<t IMMOKALEE ROAD .... 1,142 .... .t 2.955 53 84% ..... 1,610 ~ 1,814 151 ~ ~ Pl!'fQlll$ (%) repreunl movement vtllume& divklw by lhe total Intersection traffic DATE: January 21, 2009 DAY: WEDNESDAY COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 5:00 PM ~ 6:00 PM rNTERSECTIOtl: LOGAN BOULEVARD I OLDE CYPRESS BOULEVARD & IMMOKALEE ROAD LOGAN BOULEVARD I OLDE CYPRESS BOULEVARD ln 5% t I 72 105 N l t 47 13 13 .J . '* t. 31 ... 969 .... r 94 1,094 .... 3,095 ~ 88% 2.001 .. t r 126 21 376 Total Intersection Traffic 3,505 l t 256 526 t 783 22% 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS,INC. DATE: DAY: COUNT TIME: JanualY 20, 2009 TUESDAY 7:00 AM. 9:00 AM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDNlDUAL MOVEMENTS COLLIER BOULEVARD I BROKEN BACK ROAD & IMMOKALEE ROAD COLUER BOULEVARD I BROKEN SACK ROAD IMMOKALEE ROAD INTER- 15MlN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAl 7:00AM 200 0 2' ". 0 , 7 7 2 10' .. \., 1f1 276 0 387 .15 7:15PJ1l 6. , 43 ". , 2 , " , 115 75 193 129 331 , '"' '" 7:30AM 4. 0 15 ., , , 7 10 7 .7 34 126 77 332 0 40' "'" 1:45AM 73 0 ,. " , 0 , . . " 47 120 "' "0 \ '92 "'0 8:00AM \011 2 " ,,, 0 , 7 10 10 .4 " ,,, 79 24' 0 '24 813 El:15M/1. 104 0 24 128 , " 2 " If OS .. m 123 2.5 0 38' 706 6:30f\.M 87 1 21 109 0 6 6 " . o. " ", ," 227 1 '41 "" 8:45AM 00 . 19 "' 0 . . 10 , 117 " ", " 170 0 256 550 TOTAL: 777 10 182 '" , 2B 53 81 " 773 ... 1.306 7'" 2,156 2 2,957 5,313 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS COLLIER BOULEVARD I BROKEN BACK ROAD & IMMOKALEE ROAD HOUR COLLIER BOULEVARD I BROKEN BACK ROAD lMMOKALEE ROAD INTER- BEGIN NORTHBO NO SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION lEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL l..EFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEF THRU RIGHT TOTAl TOTAL 7:00AM '.7 , 102 492 0 5 32 37 16 316 242 6:" '96 ',249 , 1,"" 2,an 7;15AM 295 5 90 ,,, 0 8 32 40 24 '55 21. '" '66 1,2,a 1 t,585 2,,",, 7:30AM "2 2 71 405 0 ,. 25 41 32 "8 206 57' 350 1,152 1 1,513 2,537 7;45 AM '73 , 77 453 0 ,. 24 43 33 '49 "0 ", ". 1,0.47 2 1,445 2,562 B:OO MIl 390 7 eo 477 0 " 21 .. 29 "7 24. 572 401 007 , 1.309 2,502 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR BEGIN 1:00AM TOTAl 37 LEFT \6 EASTBOUND THRU RIGHT 376 242 WESTBOUND TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT 634 396 1.249 1 TOTAL 1,&46 INlER. SECTION TOTAL 2,811 LEF1 387 C LllER BOULEVARD I BR KEN BACK ROAD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT 31024920532 IMMOKALEE ROAD PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (pSCF = 1.09 ) COl I B UL ARC I BROKEN BACK ROAD IMMOKALEE ROAD INTER. HOUR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHi TOTAL lEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAl. lEFT THRU RIGHT TOTALIILEFT T/iRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:00AM 422 , 11\ 536 , 5 35 40 17 410 28' 69' 434 1.361 , U96 3.064 Packet Page -2603- 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, INC. <i I'-- ..- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- "'" tMMOKALEE ROAD ~ 1,818 ..... J 2,509 17 82% .... 41D ... 691 254 "\ ~ Peroenls (%) represent movement IftIllJmiO'$ dlWIed by the lotallnlersection traffic DATE: January 20, 200$ DAY: TUESDAY COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM INTERSECTION: COllIER BOULEVARD I BROKEN BACK ROAD & IMMOKALEE ROAD COLLIER BOULEVARD I BROKEN BACK ROAD 62 2% t I 4D 22 N I t 35 5 0 .,J 1 '* t. ... 1,361 +- r 434 1,796 ...... 2,317 ... 76% 521 ... t r 422 3 111 Total Intersection TraHie 3,064 I t 7D3 536 t 1,239 40% 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. 1: TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS, fNC DATE: DAY: COUNT TIME: Janu&1)' 20, 2009 TUESDAY 4:00 PM. 6:DO PM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS COLLIER BOULEVARD I BROKEN BACK ROAD & IMMOKALEE ROAD COU.IER BOULEVARD/BROKEN BACK ROAD IMMOKALEE ROAD INTER. 1~MIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WeSreCUND SECTION BEGIN LEfT THOU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:00PM 102 , 81 168 0 1 , 7 5 '" " 25& " 159 0 223 67. 4:15PM 57 , .. 127 , 3 , 13 2 203 " 2" 97 155 0 252 651 4:30PM n 3 .7 142 0 2 5 7 5 202 103 310 7ll 15. 0 22. 565 04:45PM n 2 112 19' 0 3 7 10 , 239 " 335 '0 "0 0 19' 730 5:00PM 66 0 .. 160 0 2 7 , 5 245 78 32' 73 127 0 200 SOT 5:15PM 78 1 "' ,.5 2 3 7 " . 2" " 34. 73 161 0 2" '" 5:30PM BO 2 106 '" 0 3 . , , 235 ., 323 '00 15' 0 '" 779 5:45PM 7ll 5 " 163 1 1 . 10 5 232 76 313 71 125 0 19. '82 TOTAL: 602 22 730 1,354 , 1B 55 77 37 1,791 '" 2,472 '16 1.168 0 1.7604 5.687 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS COLLIER BOULEVARD I BROKEN BACK ROAD & IMMOKALEE ROAD HOUR COLliER BOULEVARD I BROKEN BACK ROAD IMMDKALEE ROAD INTER. BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL. LEFT THRU RIGHT TOLAL lEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAt. TOTAL '1:00 PM 308 14 32. '" 1 , 27 37 16 833 313 1,\62 '" S.. 0 ." 2,742 4:15PM m , 339 620 1 10 " 39 16 ." 327 1,232 30' 56' 0 672 2.763 4:30PM 293 6 389 ... 2 10 26 " 20 932 367 1,319 2" 570 0 95' 2,899 4:.Il5PM 301 5 '2' 734 2 11 27 40 20 '55 347 1,332 314 573 0 '" 2.993 ~5;Ol)PM 294 . 40' 7D6 3 , " 40 21 '58 331 1,310 317 En 0 ." 2.945 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR COLLIER BOULE.VARD f BROKEN BACK ROAD IMMOKAL ROAD INTER. BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LE THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEfT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:.Il5PM 301 5 42' 734 2 11 2T 40 20 965 347 1332 314 573 0 687 2.993 PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = 1.09) HOUR BEGIN COLLIER BOULEVARD J BROKEN BACK ROAD NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT 5 "67 600 2 12 29 IMMOKALEE ROAD LEFT 14:.Il5PM 328 TOTAL 44 LEFT 22 EASTBOUND THRU RIGHT 1,052 37e WESTBOUND TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT 1,452 342 625 0 TOTAL 967 lNTER. SECTION TOTAL 3,Zfi2 Packet Page -2605- 1:. TRANSPORTATION K CONSULTANTS,INC. DATE: January 20, 2009 DAY: TUESDAY COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM - &:00 PM PEAK HOUR.: 4:45 PM - 5:46 PM INTERSECTION: COLLIER BOULEVARD I BROKEN BACK ROAD & IMMOKALEE ROAO COLLIER BOULEVARD I BROKEN BACK ROAD <( 71 I'-- 2% ..- 1 r E OJ ...... 44 27 N ..- ! t ..- 0 N -- N 29 12 2 ..- -- .J l ... "'" IMMOKALEE ROAD t. 0 ..... ... ... 982 625 .... J r 342 967 2.434 22 .... 75% ..... 1,052 "'* 2.487 ..... 76% 1,452 378 ~ 1,521 ., t ". 328 5 467 ~ Total Intersection Traffic Percents (0/.) represent movement volumes 3,262 dlvlaed by the Iotal inle-rs.ecllon Irelflc ! t 732 800 1 1,533 47% 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. FDOT TRAFFIC INFORMATION CD - 2007 PEAK SEASON CORRECTION FACTORS Packet Page -2607- <:t; I'-- ..- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- '<t " .~ ~ "' ro 0 . l>. '"'" >. f-< uu 0", ~ "'"' " 0 l>. . "' ~ " o l>. . "' " >.0 "H 0'" "'" Wf-< ~Z ~" UO U " 0", ~" UH ~" "''' o CU o ~ .0 00 ~~ o ~ " W>' "' H o ~ '" o . O~ t'.\ 'II U " , " " " " " " " " , " , " , , " . , , , , " " n , " . . " . " , , " , , , I' " " " " " '" , "' " " " " . " , " " " . , " , , " ~ " W , ~ " . II o " " " , " " , " , " " ~" . " :~ E -,"^, \...L. 05 0- J ~~I.O ""'N meet- \0 1.I1r- COrif'l.... \0 O('J.n co 0 "" r- OJ) W \01.0 \0 r- 0''''' ON ,"",'P roT- r- \D "'" l").......r~ </)N l"'l""'I.I1I.ODU"ICJ\ N ooooO'lCJ\m.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,OOOOrl.......~rlNNNNNNNNNNNl")l")Ml")MMMMMMMNNNNNNNN.......O ~ ~rl~rlOOO~O~Orlrlrlrl~~rlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrl~rlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrl COOMrl.,.,r-~~MN.......M""'\OCO.,.,rl~I.OCOrlMI.O.,.,OOCOCOCOOOO'lOOrlMU"I\OCOr-r-'OU"l""'N.,.,r-....U"IWr-~MCOM OO.,.,CJ\cocococococorococoCOCOCOCJ\O'I.,.,.,.,OOOOOOOOOOrlrlrlrl.......rl~_rl~rlrlrlOOODODoo.,.,m . . . , ., .,."....... .... .. . . .. "" rlrlOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOrlrl.~rlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrlrl_rrlrl_rlrlrlrl.......rl,~rlrlrlrl_.......00 r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-l_r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r- 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN """""""""""""""""""""""""'" ~MO~MO~~MO~Vrl~Wrl~~Nm~NmWMO~_rl~~~~~~~~N~~MO~mO~~rl~~N~rl O~NNOrlrlNO~rlNMOrlNNO~rlNOOrlNMOrlNNO~~NOO_NND~NNO_rlNOOrlNNM """""""""""""""""""""""""'" rl~rlrlNNNNMMMMM~qV~~~~~www~w~~~~ro~oooommm~mOOOOrlMrlrlNNNNNN OOOOODOOCOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOODODDDDOOODOO_rlrl__rl~__rlrl_rlrl t I I I I I I I I I ) I I I I T I I I I I I I I I I I I I T 1 I ~ I I I I I I ! I I I t I I I ! I I I I ~~~~~~~~I-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN.NNN """""""""""""""""""""""""'" rl~~rlOO~rl~~~rl~~rlm~N~~~O~Mo~w~ro~Nm~Nm~N~~MO~_rlWWrlW~N~W~O OO-NNOrlrlNOrlrlNOOrlNNOrlNNOrlrlNOOrlNNOrlrlNOO'~NMOrlNNOrlrlNOOrlNM """""""""""""""""""""""""'" -rlrl_rlNNNNM~M~.~~~~~)~~~~W~~~~~~~~rororom~~=moOOOrlrlrlrlNNNNN OOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOODO~rl_rl~rlrlrlrlrlrlrlrl rlNM_~W~W~O-N~~~w~ro~OrlNM~~W~OOmOrlNMV~~~~mOrlNMW~~~~~OrlNM ~rlrlrlrl-rlrlrlrlNNNNNNNNNNMMMMM~IMMMM~~~vv.~__~~~~~ -to -to -t. "'...... i' -t............ c 0 ~ ~ ~ . ." '" 0 ~ ~ . 0 . '" '" . ~ ANNUAL GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS Packet Page -2609- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. ANNUAL GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS 2007 ANNUAL BASE YR TRAFFIC YRS OF GROWTH ROADWAY SEGMENT ~ VOLUME GROWTH RATE Collier Boulevard S. of Immokalee Rd 19,484 2.00% <( I'-- Immokalee Road W. of Logan Blvd 2.00% ..- E W.ofSite 25,787 2.00% Q) W. of Collier Blvd 25,787 2.00% ...... ..- E. of Collier Blvd 24,231 2.00% ..- 0 N Logan Bouleva.rd S. of Immokalee Rd 11,683 9,44-0 4 2.00% -- N ..- -- , All traffic volumes were taken from the 2007 Collier County Average Daily Traffic Report "'" ~ In instances where fhe historical data indicates a reduction in traffic or insufficient data was available 10 calculate a growth rale Clue 10 construction, a minimum annual groWlh rate 012.0% was assumed. SAMPLE GROWTH RATE CALCULATION Annual Growth Rate (AGR) - 2007 ADT ~(lf'(rsorGrowth) -1 Base Year ADT 9,440 ~('14) AGR (Logan Blvd) =: -1 11,683 AGR (Logan Blvd) = ~5.19% HCS+/SYNCHRO CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS Packet Page -2611- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. <i I'-- ..- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- "'" IMMOKALEE ROAD @ COLLIER BOULEVARD 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. Short Report Page 1 ofl I SHORT REPORT ~, nerallnformation Site Information ~nalyst RLP Intersection Immokalee Rd @ Collier Blvd Agency or Co. TR Transportation Area Typa All other areas Date Performed 112712009 Jurisdiction Collier County Time Period AM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2014 Background Volume and Tlmlna Inout EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (vph) 19 452 291 479 1503 1 466 3 123 1 6 39 % Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0,95 0.95 0,95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed/Actuated (PIAl A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3,0 3,0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3,0 Ped/BikelRTOR Voiume 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 Parking/GradelParking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N rkinglHour .s StopslHour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3,2 Phasinn Excl. Left WB Only Thru & RT 04 Excl. Left NB Only NS Perm 08 Timing G - 12.0 G - 15,0 G = 44.0 G= G = 5.0 G- 14,0 G - 14.0 G- Y= 6,5 Y = 0 Y = 6,5 Y- Y - 6,5 Y - 0 Y- 6.5 Y= Duration of Analvsis (hrs) - 0.25 Cvcle Lenoth C = 130.0 Lane Group Capacity. Control Delav, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adjusted Fiow Rate 20 476 243 504 1582 1 491 3 98 1 6 41 Lane Group Capacity 163 1201 536 886 1610 718 674 401 341 159 201 170 vie Ratio 0.12 0.40 0.45 0.57 0.98 0,00 0,73 0,01 0.29 0.01 0,03 0,24 Green Ratio 0.09 0.34 0.34 0,26 0.45 0.45 0.20 0.22 0.22 0.11 0,11 0.11 Uniform Delay dj 54.2 32.9 33.6 42,0 35,0 19,4 49,0 40,1 42.7 51.3 51.9 53.1 Delay Factor k 0.11 0,11 0,11 0.16 0,49 0,11 0.29 0,11 0,11 0.11 0,11 0.11 Incremental Delay d2 0.3 0.2 0.6 0,9 18.4 0,0 4.0 0,0 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.7 PF Factor 1,000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1,000 1,000 Control Delay 54.5 33,1 34.2 42.8 53.4 19,4 53.0 40.1 43.1 51.4 52.0 53.9 Lane Group LOS D C C 0 0 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 I\pproach Delay 34,0 50.8 51.3 53.6 'Oroach LOS C D D D I Intersection Delay 47.3 intersection LOS D Copyright 0 2007 Universily 01 Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS'" TM Version 5.3 Generaled: 1/27/2009 9:32 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\r1p\Local Set1ing'" ,~, ^' ~ , Packet Page -2613- J/27/2009 Short Report Page I of I SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RLP Intersection Immokalee Rd @ Collier Blvd Agency or Co, TR Transportation Area Type All other areas Date Performed 1/27/2009 Time Period AM Peak Hour Jurisdiction Collier County Analysis Year 2014 Bulldout Volume and Timino Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT . Imber of Lanes 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 <( ne Group L T R L T R L T R L T R I'-- ..- dume (vph) 23 452 291 479 1519 2 476 20 123 9 21 39 ~ Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 :t::iF 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0,95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 ::: etimed/Actuated (PIA) A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2,0 N 3rtup Lost Time 2.0 2,0 2.0 -- N tension of Effective Green 2.0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 ..- ~ 'ival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3.0 3,0 PedlBike/RTOR Volume 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 Lane Width 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian TIme 3.2 3,2 3,2 3,2 Phasing Excl. Left WB Onlv Thru & RT 04 Excl. Left NB Oniy NS Perm 08 Timing G = 12.0 G = 15.0 G - 44,0 G- G = 5,0 G - 14,0 G = 14,0 G- Y = 6.5 Y = 0 Y = 6.5 Y- Y = 6,5 Y = 0 Y - 6.5 Y- Duration of Analvsis (hrs) - 0,25 Cycle Length C - 130.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 24 476 243 504 1599 2 501 21 98 9 22 41 Lane Group Capacity 163 1201 536 886 1610 718 674 401 341 156 201 170 vie Ratio 0,15 0.40 0.45 0,57 0.99 0,00 0.74 0.05 029 0,06 0,11 0.24 Green Ratio 0,09 0,34 0,34 0,26 0.45 0,45 0.20 0,22 0.22 0.11 0,11 0.11 Uniform Deiay d, 54.3 32,9 3.6 42,0 35.3 19.4 49,2 40,5 42.7 516 52,4 53,1 Deiay Factor k 0,11 0,11 0,11 0.16 0.49 0.11 0,30 0,11 0,11 0.11 0.11 0,11 I neremental Delay d, 0.4 0,2 0,6 0,9 20.7 0,0 4,5 0,1 0,5 0.2 0.2 0.7 PF Factor 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1000 1.000 1,000 1,000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 54.7 33,1 34,2 42,8 56,0 19,4 53,6 40,5 43,1 51,8 52,6 53.9 Lane Group LOS D C C D E B D D D D D D Approach Delay 34.1 52.9 51,5 53.2 Approach LOS C 0 D 0 I ntersection Delay 48,7 Intersection LOS D Copyrlght@ 2007 University of Florida, All Rights. Reserved HC$t ™ Version 5.3 Generaled: 1l27/2009 S:25 AM file:lIC:IDocllll1ents and SettingslrlplLocal Seltingsllempls2klDA,lmp 1/2712009 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. Short Report Page I ofl I SHORT REPORT "_.. 1erallnformatlon Site Information Kflalyst RLP Intersection Immokalee Rd @ Col/ier Blvd Ag ency or Co. TR TransportatIon Area Type All other areas Date Performed 1/27/2009 Jurisdiction Collier County Time Period PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2014 Background Volume and Timina Inout EB we NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (vph) 24 1161 417 378 690 0 362 6 516 2 13 32 % Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0,95 0,95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0,95 0.95 0,95 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3,0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PedlBikeJRTOR Volume 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N .king/Hour .; Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3,2 3,2 3.2 Phasino Excl. Left WB OnlY Thru & RT 04 Excl. Left NB Only NS Perm 08 Timing G= 5.0 G = 7,0 G = 44.0 G= G= 8.0 G 20.0 G - 20,0 G= Y = 6.5 Y = 0 Y = 6,5 Y= Y - 6,5 Y - 0 Y- 6,5 Y- Duration of Analvsis lhrs) - 0.25 Cvcle Lenoth C - 130.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay. and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 25 1222 334 398 726 0 381 6 412 2 14 34 Lane Group Capacity 68 1201 536 489 1392 621 1328 573 487 264 287 244 v/c Ratio 0,37 1.02 0.62 0.81 0,52 0.00 0.29 0.01 0,85 0.01 0,05 0,14 Green Ratio 0,04 0,34 0,34 0,14 0.39 0,39 0.47 0,31 0.31 0,18 0.15 0.15 Uniform Delay d, 61.0 43.0 36,0 54.1 30,2 24,0 20.6 31.3 42.1 43,7 46.9 47.6 Delay Factor k 0.11 0,50 0.21 0,35 0,13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0,38 0.11 0,11 0.11 Incremental Delay d2 3.3 30.4 2.3 10.2 0,4 0,0 0,1 0,0 13,0 0,0 0.1 0.3 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1,000 Control Delay 64.3 73.4 38,3 64.3 30,5 24,0 20.7 31.3 55.1 43,7 47.0 47,8 Lane Group LOS E E 0 E C C C C E 0 0 0 Aoproach Delay 65.9 42.5 38,5 47,4 lroach LOS E 0 0 0 I intersection Delay 52.1 Intersection LOS 0 CDpyright e 2007 Universlt)' of Florida. All Rights Reserved HCS-t ™ Version 5.3 Generaled: 1/2712009 2:26 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\rlp\LocaI Settings'pack~t-P;~~ -2615- 1/27/2009 Short Report Page I of I SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RLP Intersection Immoka/ee Rd @ Collier Blvd Agency or Co, TR Transportation Area Type All other areas Date Performed 1/27/2009 Jurisdiction Collier County Time Period PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2014 Buildout Volume and TlmlnQ Input EB WB NB 5B LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT <c nber of Lanes 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 ,....: ,e Group L T R L T R L T R L T R ..- 36 1161 417 378 741 6 392 61 516 62 103 ume (vph) 32 ~ ieavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...... = 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0,95 0.95 0.95 ..- o timed/Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A ~ rtup Lost Time 2,0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2,0 ~ 9nsion of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2,0 20 2,0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 -- "'" valType 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3,0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 P arki ng/GradefParking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/Hour Bus StopslHour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3,2 3.2 3,2 Phasino Excl. Left WB Only Thru & RT 04 Excl. Left NB Only NS Perm 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 7.0 G - 44,0 G- G= 8,0 G - 20,0 G - 20,0 G- Y= 6,5 Y - 0 y= 6,5 y- Y = 6,5 Y - 0 Y = 6.5 y= Duration of Analvsis (hrs) = 0.25 Cycle Lenqth C = 130,0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delav, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 38 1222 334 398 780 6 413 64 412 65 108 34 . Lane Group Capacity 68 1201 536 489 1392 621 1165 573 487 253 287 244 v/c Ratio 0.56 1.02 0,62 0.81 0,56 0,01 0.35 0.11 0.85 0.26 0,38 0,14 Green Ratio 0,04 0,34 0.34 0,14 0,39 0,39 0,47 0,31 0.31 0,18 0.15 0,15 Uniform Delay d, 61.4 43,0 36,0 54.1 30,8 24,1 21,1 32,3 42.1 455 49.4 47,6 Delay Factor k 0,16 0,50 0,21 0.35 0.16 0,11 0,11 0,11 0,38 011 0,11 0,11 Incremental Delay d, 10,0 30,4 2,3 10,2 0.5 0.0 0.2 0,1 13,0 0,5 0.8 0,3 PF Factor 1,000 1.000 1,000 1,000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 71.4 73,4 38,3 64.3 313 24.1 21.2 32,3 55,1 46.1 50,2 47,8 Lane Group LOS E E 0 E C C C C E D 0 0 Approach Delay 66.0 42,3 37.7 48,5 Approach LOS E 0 0 D Intersection Delay 514 Intersection LOS 0 ;opyright 10 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+™ Version 5.3 Generated: 1/2712009 2:27 PM 11e://C:\Documents and Settings\r1p\Local Settings\temp\s2k268.tmp 1/27/2009 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. IMMOKALEE ROAD @ FULL SITE ACCESS Packet Page -2617- <( I'-- ..- ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- "'" HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Immokalee Rd & Directional 2014 Buildout - AM Peak Hr 1/27/2009 ..J. - - '- .; WPWi!RleIM?'6\lIiilll'l'~1~1_ISSIi!Jli\1i,I1lI~~~~~~ Lane Configurations 'I Hi' Hi''' , Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (vehlh) 45 766 2008 32 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0,92 0,92 0.92 0,92 Hounyflowrate(vph) 49 8332183 35 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ftfs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, plaloon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC 1, stage 1 cont vol vC2, stage 2 coni vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) IC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) pO queue free % eM capacity (vehlh) E Q) ...... Raised o 2217 2558 2183 375 2558 6.8 5,8 3,5 100 45 2217 4.1 2.2 79 232 \. 32 0,92 35 728 728 6,9 3.3 90 366 mma~'IDfi~l~1iJ$.~m~atZ~1~.a~~;1(e:a~~~e?~i_~~3:-~~6w.eg~EP1~'s.a~1FJgh.i{@~t??l~~~%!l!JFi~l1i~~;~it&!g~ Volume Total 49 278 278 278 728 728 728 35 35 Volume Left 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 35 eSH 232 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 366 Volume to Capacity 0.21 0,16 0.16 0,16 0,43 0.43 0.43 0,02 0.10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Control Delay (s) 24.6 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 00 0,0 0,0 15,9 Lane LOS C C Approach Delay (s) 1.4 0,0 15.9 Approach LOS C l)j~mB~romi~~,t1zt~~lj~~:?.li*11~'$Sv~~l7;~J~f0.~f&~~1i~Wil~\~f?.{01tt~;4'~~~k~l~~i.~tt{~@t#t~12~~~S%~1~?lJjtf~~ti~~:~:it~1Wx~riq8&f~ Average Delay 0.6 intersection Capacity Utilization 48,8% ICU Level ot Service A Anaiysis Period (min) 15 Addie's Corner PUD TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Metro Transportation Synchro 6 Report Page 1 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. Lanes. Volumes, Timings 3: Immokalee Rd & Directional 2014 Buildout - AM Peak Hr 1/27/2009 .,J - - 4.... \.. .; ~_.....IlI-~l_4ii_~a~jIi~lijBili!~lliil~1Iill!l;l.~~i'W'-" ~~'~ - .,'" Lane Configurations "'i t+t ttt 'f' '(I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 19001g00 ' Lane Widlh (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 500 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 j Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 Link Distance (ft) 576 583 493 Travel Time (s) 8.7 8,8 11.2 Volume (vph) 45 766 2008 32 0 32 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Conf!. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0,92 0.92 0,92 0,92 0.92 Growth Fector 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Biockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Sign Control Free Free Stop OO~"._' Area Type: Other Control Type; UnsignaUzed ~~~fB~~N~~~~1i~~'~~~;.~~\i~~:f~ Addie's Corner PUD TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Metro Transportation Syncl1ro 6 Report Page 1 Packet Page -2619- ~ I'-- ..- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- '<t HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Immokalee Rd & Directional 2014 Buildout - PM Peak Hr 1/27/2009 / '- \. .; -+ <II- ~e..r~~ LaneConfiguralions "l +tt +tt." ." Sign"conifbJ' ' 'Fr~e Free StoP Grade 0% 0% 0% Volu!TieClleiJIh)1S4" 1.6j4 10841080 179 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 Houilyfiovhiite.\vph) ,161.1754 1178 j17 0 195 Pedestrians Lane Vvii:jth(ft) , Walking Speed (ftls) Percent J;llockage Right turn ftare (veh) Median type Raised Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal (ft) pX, plaloon unblocked vC, conmeling voiume 1296 2098 393 vCl, stage 1 conf vol 1178 vC2, stage 2 conI vol 920 vCu, unblocked vol 1296 2098 393 tC, single (s) 4.1 6,8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5,8 IF (s) 2.2 3,5 3,3 pO queue free % 68 100 68 eM capacily (vehlh) 531 94 606 ifj)~mRf~ij~~~~~~~rE~~~~a1l~~Wra.~~.a~1@:~\&a~Jk%~J~.~11fi~@J.~~J@2sfif~ii~i!~11~rm Volume Total 167 585 585 585 393 393 393 117 195 Volume Left 167 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Righi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 195 cSH 531 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 606 Volume to Capacity 0,32 0,34 0,34 0,34 0.23 0,23 0,23 0.07 0,32 Queue Length 95th (ft) 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Control Delay (s) 14.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 13.7 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 1,3 0,0 13,7 Approach LOS B Average Delay interseelion Capacity Utiljzation Analysis Period (min) 1.5 38.7% 15 ICU Level 01 Service A Addie's Corner PUD TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Metro Transportation Synchro 6 Report Page 1 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Immokalee Rd & Directional 2014 Buildout - PM Peak Hr 1/2712009 /' -+ - '- ~ ./ 1l1il!lllllml1~lI~~~B~ Lane Configurations lj ++1' +++ 11 11 IdeaI'Flbw(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ll) 12 ,12 12 12 12 12 (3i~de.(%) , 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 500 0 0 Stora.geLanes 1 1 0 Tuming Speed (mph) 15 9 15 Urik Speed (in ph) 45 45 30 Unk Distance (ll) 576 583 493 TrilY"l1lme (s) 8.7 8,8 11,2 Volume (vph) 154 1614 1084 108 0 Conii. Peds. (#/hr) Conft. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth F aclor Heavy Vehicles ("I.) Bus Blockages (#/hr') Parkin9 (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic ("I.) Sign Control o 1 9 179 0.92 100% 2% o 0.92 100% 2% o 0.92 100% 2% o 0.92 100% 2% o 0.92 100% 2%' o 0,92 100% 2%, o 0% Free 0% Free 0% Stop ~lmiS1f~~~~~~~~1;g:&~~~~&~~~~fftt~~W(~~~%~~~~?~ Area Type: Other Control Type: Unslgnallzed Addie's Comer PUD TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Metro Transportation Synchro 6 Report Page 1 Packet Page -2621- <( I'-- ..- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- """, IMMOKALEE ROAD @ LOGAN BOULEVARD 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. Short Report Page I of I I... SHORT REPORT 'lerallnformation Site Information Intersection Immokalee Rd @ Logan Blvd Analyst RLP Agency or Co. m Transportation Area Type All other areas Date Performed 112712009 Jurisdiction Collier County Time Period AM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2014 Background Gondnions Volume and Timlna Inout EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (vph) 22 666 51 252 1982 15 115 14 178 9 39 34 % Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0,95 0.95 0,95 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 20 2,0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2,0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3,0 30 3.0 3.0 PediBike/RTOR Volume . 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 5 Lane Width 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parlling/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N 'king/Hour .8 Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3,2 3,2 3,2 3.2 Phasine Exc!. Left I WB Onlv Thru & RT 04 Exc!. Left NB Onlv Thru & RT 08 G - 4.0 G = 10,0 G - 50,0 G = 0,0 G - 4,0 G = 5.0 G - 12,0 G- Timing Y = 6 y= 0 y - 5 Y = 0 Y 6 Y - 0 Y= 6 y= Duration of Analvsis (hrs\ = 0,25 Cvcle Lennth C = 110,0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 23 701 48 276 2086 15 122 15 166 9 41 31 Lane Group Capacity 125 2306 720 625 2768 863 500 580 259 64 203 173 v/c Ratio 0,18 0,30 0,07 0.44 0.75 0,02 0,24 0,03 0.64 0,14 0.20 0.18 Green Ratio 0,04 0.45 0.45 0,18 0,55 0,55 0.15 0,16 0.16 0.04 0,11 0,11 Uniform Delay d, 51.4 19,0 16,9 40.0 19.3 11,5 41,6 38,5 43,0 51,3 44,5 44.5 Delay Factor k 0.11 0,11 0,11 0,11 0,31 0.11 0.11 0,11 0.22 0,11 0,11 0.11 Incremental Delay d2 0.7 0,1 0,0 0,5 1,2 0,0 0.3 0.0 5,3 1,0 0,5 0,5 PF Factor 1,000 1.000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 Control Delay 52,1 19,1 16,9 40,5 20.5 11.5 41,9 38,7 48.3 52,3 45,1 45.0 Lane Group LOS 0 B B 0 C B D 0 D 0 D 0 Approach Delay 199 22,8 45.2 45.9 .',." 'roach LOS B C 0 0 I" .."rsection Delay 24,6 Intersection LOS C Copyright e 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS-+ TM Version 5.3 Generated: 1127r2009 9:23 AM fild/C:\Documents and Settings\rJp\LocaI Setting~" k'~'. n, . Pac et Page -2623- ]127/2009 Short Report Page] of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information . Site Information Analyst RLP Intersection Immokalee Rd @ Logan Blvd Agency or Co. TR Transportation Area Type All other areas Date Performed 1/27/2009 Jurisdiction Collier County Time Period AM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2014 Buildout Conditions Volume and Timing In out EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT . mber of Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 <:t; 1e Group L T R L T R L T R L T R I'-- ..- ;ume (vph) 22 696 51 267 1998 15 116 14 187 9 39 34 E -ieavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 a.> ~F 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0,95 0,95 0.95 0.95 ;: ,timed/Actuated (PIA) A A A A A A A A A A A A ~.rtup Lost Time 2,0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2.0 -- N ension of Effective Green 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2,0 ..- ~ ,val Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 unrt Extension 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 5 Lane Width 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 PhaslnQ Excl. Left WB Onlv Thru & RT 04 Excl. Left NB Onlv Thru & RT 08 Timing G- 4,0 G- 10,0 G 50,0 G 0.0 G - 4,0 G = 6,0 G= 12.0 G- Y- 6 Y - 0 Y - 6 Y - 0 Y= 6 Y = 0 Y 6 Y- Duration of Analvsis (hrs) - 0.25 Cvcle Lenqth C = 110.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 23 733 48 281 2103 16 122 15 176 9 41 31 Lane Group Capacity 125 2306 720 625 2768 863 500 580 259 64 203 173 v/c Ratio 0.18 0,32 0.07 0.45 0.76 0.02 0,24 0,03 0,68 0.14 0,20 0.16 Green Ratio 0,04 0,45 0.45 0,18 0,55 0.55 0.15 0.16 0.16 0,04 0.11 0.11 Uniform Delay d, 51.4 19,1 16.9 40,1 19.4 11.5 41.6 38.6 43,3 51,3 44,6 44,5 Delay Factor k 0,11 0.11 0,11 0,11 0.31 0,11 0.11 0,11 0,25 0.11 0.11 0,11 Incremental Delay d2 0.7 0.1 0,0 0,5 1,3 0.0 0,3 0,0 7.0 1.0 0,5 0,5 PF Factor 1.000 1,000 1.000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 . Control Delay 52,1 19.2 16.9 40,6 20.7 11.5 41.9 38.7 50,3 52,3 45,1 45,0 Lane Group LOS 0 B B 0 C B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approach Delay 20,0 22.9 46.5 45.9 Approach LOS C C 0 0 Intersection Delay 24.9 Intersection LOS C ::opyrighl (C 2007 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HC$+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 1/27/2009 9:24 AM ille://C:\Documents and Settings\r1p\Local Settings\temp\s2kI95,tmp 1/2712009 Sholt Report 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. Page I of 1 I SHORT REPORT "eral Information Site Information Intersection Immokalee Rd @ Logan Blvd Analyst RLP Agency or Co. TR Transportation Area Type All other areas Date Performed 1/27/2009 Jurisdiction Collier County TIme Period PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2014 Beckground Conditions Volume and Timimllnnut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (vph) 56 1778 167 104 1070 34 139 23 417 14 14 52 % Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PretimedlActuated (PIA) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2,0 . 2.0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unil Extension 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 15 0 0 5 0 0 45 0 0 5 Lane Width 12,0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 D~rking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N l-cinglHour ~ _s Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3,2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phaslno Excl. Left WB Onlv Thru & RT 04 Excl. Left NB Onlv Thru & RT OS Timing G 4.0 G = 3,0 G = 45,0 G 0.0 G = 4.0 G 6.0 G - 24.0 G= Y = 6 Y = 0 Y 6 Y = 0 Y - 6 Y - 0 Y = 6 Y= Duration of Analvsis !hrs) = 0.25 Cvcle Lenoth C = 110.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delav, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 59 1872 160 109 1126 31 146 24 392 15 15 49 Lane Group Capacity 125 2076 648 406 2214 691 500 967 432 64 406 345 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.90 0,25 0,27 0.51 0,04 0,29 0,02 0,91 0,23 0.04 0.14 Green Ratio 0,04 0.41 0.41 0,12 0.44 0.44 0,15 0.27 0,27 0.04 0,22 0.22 Uniform Delay d, 52.0 30,4 21.4 4.2 22.5 17.8 41,9 29,3 38,7 51,5 3.9 34.7 Delay Factor k 0.11 0,42 0.11 0,11 0.12 0,11 0,11 0.11 0.43 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay dz 2.8 5.9 0.2 0,4 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 22,6 1.9 0,0 0.2 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1,000 1,000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 54,8 36.4 21.6 44.5 22.7 17,8 42,3 29,3 61.3 53,4 33.9 34.9 Lane Group LOS D D C D C B 0 C E D C C Approach Delay 35,8 24.4 55,0 38.2 "Clach LOS 0 C 0 D 1111~drsection Delay 34,9 Intersection LOS C Copyright Q 2007 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved HCS+™ Version 5.3 file:/IC:\Documents and Settings\rlp\Local Settings\ Packet Page -2625- Generatect 1(2712009 9:24 AM 1/27/2009 Short Report Page I of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst RLP Intersection Immokalee Rd @ Logan Blvd Agency or Co. TR Transportation Area Type All other areas Date Performed 1/2712009 Time Period PM Peak Hour Jurisdiction Collier County Analy sis Year 2014 Bui/dout Conditions Volume and Timing Input EB we NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT <c mber of Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 r-..: ne Group L T R L T R L T R L T R ..- 56 1872 167 134 1170 34 139 23 52 lume (vph) 445 14 14 ~ Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ...... -IF 0,95 0,95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 095 ..- ..- ,timed/Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 ~ lrtup Lost Time 2.0 2,0 20 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2,0 ~ tension of Effective Green 2.0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2,0 2,0 -- ">t ivai Type 3 3 3 3 3 . 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3.0 3,0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 15 0 0 5 0 0 45 0 0 5 Lane Width 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 12,0 12.0 12,0 Parking/GradelParking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3,2 3,2 3,2 Phasinq Excl. Left WB Onlv Thru & RT 04 Excl. Left NB Onlv Thru & RT 08 Timing G - 4.0 G - 3,0 G - 45.0 G = 0.0 G - 4,0 G = 6,0 G = 24.0 G- Y = 6 Y - 0 y = 6 Y = 0 Y = 6 Y = 0 y= 6 y- Duration of Analysis (hrs) 0.25 Cvcle Lenqth C 110,0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay. and LOS Determination EB WB NB S8 Adjusted Flow Rate 59 1971 160 141 1232 31 146 24 421 15 15 49 Lane Group Capacity 125 2076 648 406 2214 691 500 967 432 64 406 345 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.95 0,25 0,35 0.56 0,04 0,29 0,02 0.97 0.23 0.04 0.14 Green Ratio 0,04 0.41 0,41 0,12 0.44 0.44 0.15 0,27 0,27 0,04 0.22 0.22 Uniform Delay d, 52,0 31,4 21.4 44,6 23.1 17.8 41,9 29,3 39,6 51,5 33,9 34.7 Delay Factor k 0.11 0,46 0,11 011 0,15 0,11 011 0.11 0.48 0.11 0.11 0,11 Incremental Delay d2 2,8 10,3 0.2 0,5 0.3 0,0 0.3 0,0 36.5 1.9 0,0 0.2 PF Factor 1.000 1,000 1,000 1.000 1000 1.000 1,000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 Control Delay 54,8 41,7 21.6 45.1 23.4 17,8 42,3 29,3 76,2 53.4 33.9 34.9 Lane Group LOS 0 0 C 0 C B D C E 0 C C Approach Delay 40.6 254 65,9 38.2 Approach LOS D C E D Intersection Delay 39,1 Intersection LOS 0 Copyright \t) 2007 University of Florlda, AI) Rights Reserved HCS+ ™ Version 5.3 Generated: 1/2712009 9:2~ AM file:l/C:\Documents and Settings\rlp\Local Settings\temp\s2k ] B7,tmp 1127/2009 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS Packet Page -2627- ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- ~ <( I'-- ..- TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS ADDIE'S CORNER PUD ITE TRIP GENERATION REPORT, 8th EDITION E Q) ...... Land Use Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Shopping Center Ln (T) = 0.59 Ln (X) + 2.32 Ln (T) = 0.67 Ln (X) + 3.37 Ln (T) ~ 0,65 Ln (X) + 5,83 (LUe 820) 61% in I 39% out 49% in I Sl%out T Trips, X I,OOO's sq, ft, of Gross Floor Area PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at 8:30 A.M.. Thursdav. November 18. 201 0, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room. 3rd Floor, Admin- istnation Building, Collier Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples Florida, to consider: Petition: PUDZ-2009-AR-14425, Happy #4 Family Cor- poration, Lany Pomposini, President/Director, represent- ed by Bob Duane, AICP of Hole Montes and Richard D, Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., is requesting a rezone from the Rural Agricultural Zoning District to the Commercial Planned Unit Devei- opment District (CPUD) Zoning District to aliow develop- ment of a maximum of 135,000 square feet of retail or office use for a project to be known as the Addies Corner CPUD which consists of a 23.33 acre parcel located in the northwestern quadrant of the intersection of 1m- mokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951). Subject property is located in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Fiorida. (Coordi- nator: Kay Deseiem, AICP) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Expert witnesses shall be limited to 10 minutes each. Persons who have been authorized to represent a group or organization should limit their presentation to ten minutes. Persons wishing to have written or graphic ma- terials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respec- tive public hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Department of Zoning and Land Development Review prior to November 18, 2010, in order to be considered at the public hearing. All materials used in presentation before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners, if applicable, HFJIlTAGE 8....Y ''''' ~"""- " " PROJECT LOCATION ~. v lC.Il..S46) . 8 . I RlCHLAt/tI '" . o " " ~ ii v ..00 """ aRlTTNlT'''Y APNftt.lEN"n; W.lfIU Sf'llINGS Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which includes all testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Collier County Planning Commission Collier County, Florida Mark p, Strain, Chairman No. 231188455 Or:tober 31 2010 Packet Page -2629- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. <( I'-- ..- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- ">t 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (Section 10.03,00, COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (IDe) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (IS) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supercede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to Section 10.03.00 of the IDC. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of.way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affIXed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3, The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, TillS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT L. DUANE, AICP WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HElSHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10,03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETmON NUMBER PUDZ-2009- AR-14425. ~~ HOLE MONTES, INC. 950 Encore Wav STREET OR P.O, BOX SIGNATURE OF /,l'PUC\Hf OR AGENT ROBERT L. DUANE. AICP Naples, Florida 34110 CITY, STATE, ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscnbed before me this 5th day of November. 2010, by Robert L. Duane. NCP. personallv known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. /;,J. ,." b., , ,'" . '.' f.,?, ~.. . /') _.,_ ." , r" _" '., ",' (tl.idcl..U' \j)u.'L~ L4ci {lJ/-il/eeL;"!.I, Signature of Notary Public ","'., PAULETTE DEBUS CHAIlBONNEAU ; ~ ,," MY COMMISSION' DO 812639 ;.j EXPIRES: Deeerrl>er 7. 2012 Barl::leaThruNcaryPlillctMldetwlbni P AULETIE DEBUS CHARBONNEAU Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) H:1200612006100IWP\CCPCIAFFIOAVIT AND SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS and NOTICE 5-2-05.doc Packet Page .2631- ~ I'-- ..- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- '<t ~, - aiIlIJC.1L"" - ,1t:-N--";':;"<:-:< -. - _ ':~fu~~~~.tf,-_,4.-~~:::i:;.,_:~:iJ ...,'J....""- ~,~.- ~ ~ ' . ,,;iL:~~t;:~.;~~:.~>~.:~7.' -,.:.__.~"""~-,,.- -, -... .-~~rf21:f~ '1 ~~";->:.----' -,-- - - "'1(.:~;' }tl? ,. 'r..: ;;,,> , if - _.i~.~;'" : ',;'ll '.;.~' ~~~. ~i:.-. ;; ,....- -',~' ft, ~. ~l:. -~:t- .~~::~~:~.__..;'i,;-~ - y . : 4' ~. - -,~ - -~ + ~ " , . , . ~;; .:i .~. ~ <( I'-- ..- E Q) ...... ..- ..- o N -- N ..- -- '<;f" .~ '-~-~}: , -.. ..-:-" t':'t, _ ...r'i:, ~ i ". _: _.:~'~ .,.,'.! . ii':'~~'''.~- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. ORDINANCE NO. 2011-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 135,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND/OR A RETIREMENT COMMUNITY/GROUP HOUSING AT A FAR OF .60 AND/OR A HOTELIMOTEL AT AN INTENSITY OF 26 UNITS PER ACRE FOR A 23.33+/- ACRE PARCEL TO BE KNOWN AS THE ADDIE'S CORNER MPUD, LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR 846) AND COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951), IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BV PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Happy #4 Family Corporation, represented by Rober! 1. Duane, AICP of Hole Montes and Richard D. V ovanovich, Esquire, of Coleman, Y ovanovich & Koester, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Florida, is changed from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District to allow for development of up to 135,000 square feet of commercial development and/or a retirement community/group housing at a FAR of .60 and/or a hotel/motel at an intensity of26 units per acre for a 23.33+/- acre parcel to bc known as Addie's Corner MPUD. in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas l11ap or maps, Addies Comer PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Revised 1/2411 1 Page I of2 Packet Page -2635- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly, SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall becol11c cffective upon filing with the Departmcnt of State, PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED hy super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of _ ,2011. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: FRED W. COYLE, Chairman , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Assistant County Attorney , O.S-- 0\d-\\\ ?> Exhibit A: Exhibit 8: Exhibit C: Exhibit D: Exhibit E: Exhibit F: Pennitted Uses Development Standards Master Plan Legal Description Requested Deviations from LDC Developer Commitl11ents 09-CPS-0095] 166 Addies Corner PUDZ-2009-AR- J 4425 Revised J.l24/J 1 Page 2 of2 Packet Page -2636- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT "A" LIST OF PERMITTED USES ADDlES CORNER MPUD No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: 1. Tract A - Permitted Commercial Principal Uses: A. Commercial Professional Retail & General Office Permitted Use (Sic In Parenthesis) 1, Accident & Health Insurance Services 2. Accounting, Auditing and Bookkeeping Services 3. Adjustment services 4. Advertising (consultants) agencies 5, Advertising, not elsewhere classified 6. Agricultural uses 7. Architectural services 8, Auto & Home Supply Stores 9, Bakeries, Retail 10. Banks, commercial: national 11 , Banks, commercial: not chartered 12. Banks, commercial: state 13. Banks, savings: Federal 14. Banks, savings: not federally chartered 15. Barber Shops 16. Beauty Shops 17. Book Stores 18, Business Associations 19. Business Consulting Services, not elsewhere classified 20. Camera & Photographic Supply Stores 21. Candy, Nut & Confectionery Stores 22. Carpet and Upholstery Cleaning 23. Civic, Social and Fraternal Associations 24, Clothing & Accessory Stores, Men's & Boy's 25. Clothing Stores, Women's 26. Collection Services 27. Commodity Contracts Brokers & Dealers 28. Coml11ercial Art & Graphic Design 29, Commercial Photography 30. Commercial Econol11ic, Sociological & Educational Research 31. Computer & Computer Software Stores 32. Computer Facilities Management Services 33. Computer Maintenance and Repair 34, Computer Processing & Data Preparation Services 35. Computer Programming services Addies Comer MPUD PUDZ-2009-AR-I4425 Last revised: 03-02.11 (6321) (8721) (7322) (731 I) (7319) (N/A) (8712) (5531) (5461) (6021) (6029) (6022) (6035) (6036) (7241) (7231) (5942) (8611) (8748) (5946) (5441 ) (7217) (8641) (5611) (5621) (7322) (6221 ) (7336) (7335) (8732) (5734) (7376) (7378) (7374) (7371) Page I of 12 Packet Page -2637- Computer Rental & Leasing Credit Reporting Services Credit Unions, Federal Credit Unions, State: not federally chartered Dairy Products Stores Data Processing Consultants Dance Studios, Schools & Halls Data Processing Services Dental Laboratories Dentist Office/Clinic Direct mail advertising service Direct Selling Establishments Doctors - Medicine Offices & Clinics Doctors - Osteopathy Offices & Clinics Doctors - Chiropractors Offices & Clinics Drapery, Curtain & Upholstery Stores Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages); Bottle Clubs and Cabarets are not permitted Drug Stores Eating Places Engineering services: industrial, civil, electrical, mechanical, marine and design 56. Executive Offices 57, Executive & Legislative Offices Combined 58. Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance Services 59. Floor Covering Stores 60, Florists 61. Food Stores, Miscellaneous 62, Foreign Branches & Agencies of Banks 63, Foreign Trade & International Banking Institutions 64, Furniture Stores 65. Funeral home or parlor 66, Gasoline Service Stations 67. General Government. not elsewhere classified 68. Gift, Novelty & Souvenir Shops 69, Grocery Stores 70. Hair weaving 01' Replacement Services 71. Hardware Store 72, Health practitioners - not elsewhere classified 73. Hobby, Toy & Games Shops 74, Home health care services 75. Hotels & Motels 76, Household Appliance Stores 77, Hospital & Medical Healthy Services 78. Information Retrieval Services 79. Insurance Carriers, not elsewhere classified 80. Investment Advice 81. Jewelry Stores 82. Land Subdividers & Developers 83, Landscape architects, consulting & planning 84, Laundries (Coin Operated) & Dry-cleaning Addies Comer MPUD PUOZ-2009-AR-14425 Last revised: 03-02-11 36. 37. 38. 39, 40. 41. 42. 43, 44. 45, 46, 47. 48. 49, 50. 5!. 52. 53, 54, 55. Packet Page -2638- 4/12/2011 Item 17A (7377) (1323) (6061) (6062) (5451) (7379) (7911) (7374) (8072) (8021) (7331) (5963) (80] I) (8031) (8041) (57]4) (5813) (5912) (58]2) (871 I) (911]) (9131 ) (6331) (5713) (5992) (5499) (6081) (6082) (57]2) (726 I) (5541) (9199) (5947) (54] ]) (7299) (5251) (8049) (5945) (8082) (7011) (5722) (6324) (7375) (6399) (6282) (5944) (6552) (0781) (7215) Page 2 of 12 Legal services Libraries (except regional libraries) Life Insurance Services Liquor Stores Loan brokers Luggage & Leather Goods Stores Management Services Management Consulting Services Markets, Meat & Fish (Seafood) Markets Markets, Fruit & Vegetable Markets Medical Equipment Rental & Leasing Medical Laboratories Membership Organizations, not elsewhere classified Miscellaneous amusement and recreational services not elsewhere classified, Only judo instruction, karate instruction, moped rental, motorcycle rental, rental of bicycles, scuba and skin diving instruction are permitted Miscellaneous Business Credit Institutions Miscellaneous General Merchandise Stores Miscellaneous Home Furnishings Stores Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified excluding massage parlors, steam baths, tattoo parlors and Turkish baths, Miscellaneous Retail Stores, not elsewhere classified Mortgage Bankers & Loan Correspondents Musical Instrument Stores News Dealers & Newsstands Nondeposit Trust Facilities Optical Goods Stores Optometrists - offices & clinics Paint, Glass & Wallpaper Stores Pension, Health and Welfare Funds Services Personal Credit Institutions Photocopying & Duplicating Services Photographic Studios, Portrait Photo finishing Laboratories Physical Fitness Facilities (permitted only when physically integrated and operated in conjunction with another permitted use in this district - no stand alone facility permitted) Podiatrists - offices & clinics Political Organizations Professional Membership Organizations Professional Sports Clubs & Promoters Public Relations Services Radio, Television & Consumer Electronics Stores Radio, Television & Publishers Advertising Representatives Real Estate Agents and Managers Record & Prerecorded Tape Stores; adult video rental or sales prohibited 126. Religious Organizations 127. Repair Shops & Related Services, not elsewhere classified 128. Retail Nurseries, Lawn & Garden Supply Stores Addic5 Comer MPUD PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Last revised: 03-02-11 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92, 93. 94. 95. 96. 97, 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106, 107. 108. 109. 110. 1 I I. 112, 113. 114. 115. 116. 117, 118. 119. 120. 121. 122, 123. 124. 125. Packet Page -2639- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. (8 I II) (8231 ) (6311) (5921) (6163) (5948) (874 I) (8742) (542 I) (5431) (7352) (8071) (8699) (7999) (6159) (5399) (5719) (7299) (5999) (6162) (5736) (5994) (6091) (5995) (8042) (523 I) (6371) (6141) (7334) (7221) (7384) (799 I) (8043) (8651) (8621) (7941 ) (8743) (5731) (7313) (6531) (5735) (8661) (7699) (5261) Page 3 of 12 134. 135. 136. 137, 138. 139. 140. 141. 142. 143. 144. 145. 146. 147, ]48, ]49. 150. 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 129. 130. 131. 132. 133. Secretarial and Court Reporting Serv ices Security Brokers, Dealers & Flotation Companies Security and Commodity Exchanges Sewing, Needlework & Piece Goods Stores Services Allied with the Exchange of Securities or Commodities, not elsewhere classified Shoe Repair Shops and Shoeshine Parlors Short-Term Business Credit Institutions, except agricultural Social Services, Individual & Family (activity centers, elderly or handicapped only; day care centers for adult & handicapped only) Sporting Goods Stores & Bicycle Shops Stationery Stores Stores, Children's and Infants Wear Stores, Family Clothing Stores, Miscellaneous Apparel & Accessory Stores, Shoes Stores, Women's Accessory & Specialty Surety Insurance Services Surveying Services Tanning Salons Tax Return Preparation Services Title Abstract Offices Title Insurance Services Tobacco Stores & Stands Travel Agencies (no other transportation services) Used Merchandise Stores Veterinary services for animal specialties Video Tape Rental, adult video rental or sales prohibited Watch, Clock & Jewelry Repair II. Tract A - Permitted Group Housing/Retirement Communitv/Princioal Uses: 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. (7338) (6211) (6231) (5949) (6289) (7251 ) (6153) (8322) (5941) (5943) (5641) (5651) (5699) (5661 ) (5632) (6351) (8713) (7299) (7291) (6541) (6361) (5993) (4724) (5932) (0742) (7841 ) (7631) A. Group Housing, 805 J Skilled Nursing, Interl11ediate Care Facilities 8052, Nursing and Personal Care not else classified 8059. B. Independent Living Units C. Assisted Living Units D. Retirement Community III. Tract A - Permitted Accessorv Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with the pennitted principal uses, including, but not limited to: A. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the pennitted uses within this MPUD document. Addies Comer MPUD PUDZ-2009-AR-I4425 Last revised: 03..02-11 Page 4 of 12 Packet Page -2640- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. B. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. C, Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the LDC. IV. Tract B - Permitted Preserve Area Uses: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for the preserve area depicted on the MPUD Master Plan, that is required to be a minimum of 8.85 acres, other than those uses allowed by Section 3,05.07 H.l.h. of the LDC, or any successor provision. V. Group HousinglRetirement COl11munitv Commitments: The developer of the group housing/retirement community, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and be subject to the following operational standards for the units in the retirement community, including but not limited to, independent living units, assisted living units or skilled nursing units: 1. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older. 2. There shall be on-site dining for the residents. 3, Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services may be provided for the residents' individualized needs including but not limited to l11edical office visits. 4. There shall be an on-site manager/activities coordinator to assist residents with their individual needs. The manager/coordinator shall also be responsible for arranging trips to off-site events as well as planning for lectures, movies, music and other entertainment for the residents at the on-site clubhouse, 5. A weJlness center shall be provided on-site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall be provided for the residents. 6. Each unit shall be equipped to notify emergency service providers in the event of medical or other emergency, 7, Each unit shall be designed so that a resident can age in place. For exal11ple, kitchens may be easily retrofitted to lower the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted to add grab bars. Addjes Comer MPlJD PtJDZ+2009.AR-]442S Last revised: 03-02- t 1 Page 5 of 12 Packet Page -2641- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ADDlES CORNER MPUD The table below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Addies Corner MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. I. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ~~~=~x.: NfA NfA - As Shown 25 ft, 25 ft. 25 ft, 521 ft, Minimum SPS 15 ft, 15 ft, 521 ft. Minimum Preserves MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS ft, 10 ft, 10 ft, 25 ft, 25 ft, 1/2 the sum of building heights" 10 ft, 10 ft, 10 ft, 20 ft" 10 ft, 10 ft, Retail Buildin 5 Office Buildin 5 45 ft, 55 ft. ] .000 sq, ft", ! 135,000 sq, ft. ... Maximum 0,60 F,A.R. up to 26 Nf A units er acre ***. ...... & ***** Maximum 26 units per acre *U. .... & ..... (FAR, NotNfA A licable) No structure may be located closer than 20 feet to the top of bank of a Jake (allowing for the required minimum 20 fOOl wide lake maintenance easement). 5 ft. 5 ft, 35 ft, 35 ft, fA fA MINIMUM FLOOR AREA MAXIMUM GROSS COMMERCIAL AREA GROUP CARE FACILITIES HOTEL & MOTEL . .. Per principal structure, kiosk vendor, concessions. and temporary or mobile sales !>tructures shall be permitted to have a minimum floor area oftwenty~five (25) square feet and shall be subject to the accessory structure standards set forth in the LDC, ... Total allowable commercial square footage is 135,000 of commercial development. For each acre of Group Housing/Retirement Community or Hotel/Motel or fraction thereof developed, ] 0,914 S, F. of commercial development will be reduced on Tract "A ". *.** The maximum height and setbacks shall be the same as those for office buildings. ....... 111e preserve area shall not be used in calculating the F.A.R. for C.C.R.C. use or the density for HotellMotel. Addies Corner MPUD PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Last revised: 03-02-11 Page 6 of 12 Packet Page -2642- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. II. DEVELOPMENT WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE EAST In the event amendments are made to the Tree Farm MPUD to the east of this MPUD to allow for a unified development plan of both properties, a zero setback shall be allowed along the COl11mon property line of this MPUD. III. ALTERNATIVE LANDSCAPING EAST PROPERTY LINE A minimum 6-foot height hedge, minimum 3-foot in spread, planted a maximum 4-feet on center, 100% opaque at planting shall be installed along the east property line, in lieu of a wall, along with other requirements of a Type B Landscape buffer. IV. A stipulation has been added that outside amplified music is prohibited, Addies Comer MPUD PUDZ-2009-AR-I4425 Last revised: O~-02.11 Page 7 of 12 Packet Page -2643- ~; i !;; 1 , , . , I , ,- j ~ w' -> f-O<: U~ <i:2 ~c.. ~\' 1 \t l " ~ I ) - 1'1 i I, ------,- ---- --... !:~ -_.........----_.~ ~ 6, <?; i ;~ : g! If f! I: i ~'-T-- -c_d-,' ........... . g ~ ~ ~~ , . b < 'r i · ~; r '1 ~; n';, ~ I,t I 01 f ~ ~ 10. <:: 1 ~.; . ~$~- ~,:, 'I' , , -'---~;'Q~-:'- - .1"1 -c,' '!,,-, ""Xl ~" ('(l lVlI'U~.... Addies Corner MPUD PUDZ-2009.AR.14425 La5t revised: 03-02-11 Packet Page -2644- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. ~ ,- " ,I r i';-~ 5 ~ ';:,J, i g; ~ p .;:. r ~i p "1"1' _.'" I i Ii' i ;: ~.. ~,~ 1"1 ' !' ::;'1 ; 'Dl~' ," ~ .) " ~e, I ;; > :-;~ D. ~ ~i ~:':ii 'I > ~ ~~':;I ~ :l "';;: ~ ~i '" r;~" '1': ~ w ~;~, : i:- t:: ~'il~'l>'i i 'r III . ~:_..::,:.I..,.J f , ,- ,,1.-. I'll ;iiD ii, IH ~ LJ " : . ~~~ , , ' ~,~ 1 ","~ : r' ~ I frbl'J r\i !'~ 'j, f ~ :'j (-; 1 i~; __~ (9vS'Olf:>) OYOlt 3:rJV>iOWWI ' ~ .1,': : ,.~~ :::;;;::"'-';:;";:"--"-";::~"''''':~::::::~=:;.:~_~~:':':'~:::.::.:~'..u~_;;;~'~;~_'~~~_;:_',-,:_:,'=--"- ,.J -, oj ~":., ~-::~~:~'~-:;_~~;.:~'';:',,:-;=___~'.~::''. ....::.;~ ~'_.. .-- ....-r---'-,."..~--_._ --:.;:..--~j'...;::-::"~:i~":"..-'-,-ii.~.....-<-;~r:~_...~~..,. ~-"'_.n__~~ - ._-!_ _~"''''~_~__---- -~~---:--:~;=-__~::-c-- ___ ~.o __~_'~!~~-_--~~~"::,'-,o---: 1VNV:> ~"';;Xl' """,,;;., Ii: - ---- -- , ( -- - - -::-::=:-:..---==::::- _ _.~:=~~~iigtj~ :~__~~_~~~--- ~~-'~~-~J;' ~,.:-.:.::.~:~: = -- _.- -. ~ ':.-.r~ _-~? ;;:--=~_=~,~ _~=~~'c.~ -,:i--~-:;'- ~=1~~\ ~:JI r-"'" - ,r r' I . - ,i~\~-''T l'~- I-~( .llJ III ~L-_J.l-:"n~,7' 1,--' (it l'll'l I \~ 'II I,;;, '(1 :1, 1 ' i I ~I' " \ 1-'- II!I 1'1 I H-tl ' I I I -,.1 \-0' , I ' 1 I I I I . 11111 \ -- -~., ~ II I. . ___' I~IIII \'--"1 - ,_ .11', ',) L ~ l.II, I '] I 'I ...,~, \, ,,' ;-, '--- '1 I, 'I' ~. i 1 -.. '1111. C' ~ <: ..--1 ,)~=L___~~j "L-=-=.j.-)/ ~~ ~~~~-;::~~~~==~;~:?~,=~" - \... ~~~:~~-':;=~'~;~';~,- ~~ I, If _, -. ~ .[ ,--, ...--, L-, -:::_:~ f-'-'~ ~ . .._ I i /...;> L--' --) U I. ~ \ ~f' ; I I \0 f [I ~ -J t )r - t ,_ ~_.. c-; ~ '.~> i::-~,. ~=) "2,.. ~ i 1 ~ _,_,.~~. :-:J ,:.--=,C) -1-'. - - ---- <n Ii ~.! ,.,~ I.f I . lil\~ ,I -" . ~i;~ i"ii'I' 1.---. ___~ ~w i~'~-=-~--- r Ii I I ~ '---j -1 <( ! ::, I 1 -' ;/ 11 '-_/ f !Ii .1 G---'I lJ_i~W I! ,- ,~ t Page 8 of 12 g . , , ~? .~~ " '\'f '. ~i' i# ~; ;~ ,;<e, 1. .r 10; 01.'; ~ ~~ i!"1I-~ 19: h~ ~~, :;~r c-:t'i 8"'~ ~~r, :~ iir-----1i;- il . 'I, :11; I" " . ..'111) " , l ~'" t .' "..; ;0:; z~ : ~, .. "~ ;:; ~- ~~ ,~ a~ i~ ti.l '" ~ ~" ~s ~~ w~ ~.~ l:i~ ;:ct r!l, lit> ~~ Q ;~ ogi' I ~~!!l ! 2iil,[ ! >...' ~: S~ ~ z <( -' c... 0<: "" ESt;; Z~ 0<:"" OCl U:l <.f)c.. ~~ 8' <(~ f- 55 I >< "" ~ I m~; U;;; l'l1'ltlt~' ~n,!" I ": ~~MI11~ ~~.~~~~ mill Il'I!Rr~'l' 1'1" I!j!' -.-H 10111 I~I! ~I, ~I! 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDlES CORNER MPUD The North one-half (1/2) of the West one-half (1/2) of the Southeast one-quarter (1/4) of the Southeast one-quarter (1/4) of Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East; and The South one-half (1/2) of the West one-half (1/2) of the Southeast one-quarter (1/4) of the Southeast one-quarter (1/4) of Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East; excepting the south 100 feet thereof; and The East one-half (112) of the East one-half (l/2) of the East one-half (1/2) of the Southwest one- quarter (1/4) of the Southeast one-quarter (1/4) of Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, excepting the south 100' thereof. Addies Comer MPUD PUtJZ-2009-AR-14425 Last revised: 03-01-11 Pase 9 of 12 Packet Page -2645- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT "E" LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC ADDlES CORNER MPUD 1. Deviation # 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03 .02.H. I ,a., coml11ercial and industrial districts, which require if located on a contiguous residentially zoned property, the wall and/or fence shall be a minimum of six (6) feet and a maximum of eight (8) feet in height and shall be located a minimum of six (6) feet from the residentially zoned district, to not require a wall within a Type B buffer along the east property line of this MPUD adjacent to the Tree Farm MPUD to the east. (See Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan,) As mitigation for the wall, a 6-foot height hedge shall be required in addition to the requirements of a Type B Landscape buffer, (Also, see Exhibit B - Development Standards pertaining to Landscaping). 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5,05.04 D,] to allow the floor area ratio (F.A.R.) to be increased from 0.45 to 0,60 for a Group HousinglRetirement COl11l11unity, Addies Comer MPUD PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 La~t revised: 03-02-11 Page 10 of 12 Packet Page -2646- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT F DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS SPECIFIC TO THE PROJECT ADDlES CORNER MPUD 1. TRANSPORT A nON REQUIREMENTS (Amended by Transportation Staff on 2/4/1 0) changes accepted on 3/26/1 0 and then CAO edits put in) I, The Owner will dedicate in fee right-of-way for the purpose of relocating the Cocohatchee Canal as depicted on Tract A on the MPUD Master Plan, that includes compensatory right-of-way for the turn lane into the project. This area comprises x 1.62 acres and was based on the most current information available at the time of approval of this ordinance. The property owner will dedicate to Collier County this right-of-way within 90 days of written request of the County at no cost to the County. The County will be responsible to relocate the canal, except only those portions immediately adjacent to (approximately J 00' each side of) the proposed bridge. Collier County Transportation will provide design direction to the developer as to the ultimate alignment of the relocated canal prior to the time of SDP approval. 2, The Owner, his successor or assigns shall provide a roadway connection available to adjacent properties to facilitate interconnection to the properties to the east (the Tree Farm MPUD) and West (Mirasol PUD), at the time of submittal of the first development order application, 3. When Owner constructs the bridge providing connection to Immokalee Road it shall be constructed in a location consistent with the future location of the Cocohatchee Canal to accommodate the ultimate canal configuration. This will include relocation of the canal immediately adjacent to (approximately] 00' each side of) the proposed bridge. 4. The Owner, his successor, or assigns agrees to construct at no cost to the County a 12' multi-use pathway along the North side of the future location of the Cocohatchee Canal, within property owned by Collier County, which shall connect to the pathway to the West. A 10' pathway may be substituted at this location if consistent with the County's Comprehensive Pathway Plan, This pathway shall be constructed prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 5. The development within this project shall be limited to 1,044 unadjusted two- way PM peak hour trips (or 708 adjusted two-way, PM peak hour trips; correspondent to the highest trip generation scenario of those proposed in the updated traffic study information dated November 6, 2009); allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the Addics Comer MPUD PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Last revised: 03-02- L 1 Pagel! of12 Packet Page -2647- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. adjacent roadway network. The terms "adjusted" and "unadjusted" shall reference allowances for pass-by and internal capture trip reductions. For purposes of calculation ofthe weekday PM peak hour trip generation of this POO. the lesser of the weekday PM peak hour trips as calculated in the Institute of Traffic Engineer's (ITE) Report, titled Trip Generation, 8th Edition or the trip generation as calculated in the then current lTE Trip Generation Report shall be utilized. 6. The Owner, his successor, or assigns agrees to be responsible for 2% of the construction costs (not to exceed $50,000) to be considered the PUD's proportionate share of the improvements to the intersection of C.R. 95 I and Immokalee Road. Payment shall be due within 90 days ofreceipt of the County's written request. The tenn "improvel11ents", in this paragraph, means the relocation of the canal, the at-grade il11provement of turning movements and turn lanes, all other ancillary at-grade improvements (curbs, bike lanes, etc), construction of a relocated bridge over the CocohatcheeCanal, and signalization for all movements, The term does not refer to potential future, grade-separated intersection il11provements, II. ENVIRONMENTAL I. Based on total site acreage of 23.34 acres and 22.65 acres of native habitat area, 3.4 acres (15% of habitat area) is required to be preserved pursuant to the Collier County Land Development Code. The MPUD Master Plan shall provide 8.85 acres of preserve area, 2, As a part of the Environmental Resource Permitting process of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), recol11l11endations from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding impacts to protected wildlife species will, be incorporated into the permits issued for this project. The developer shall comply with the guidelines set forth within those perl11its, Habitat management plans shall be provided for the Florida panther, Florida black bear, Big Cypress fox squirrel, wood stork, and any other protected species which inhabit or utilize the areas within the project. Addie.., Comer MPUD PUDZ.2009.AR-14425 Last revised: 03.02.11 P:tge 12of12 Packet Page -2648- 4/12/2011 Item 17.A. 20D · Tuesday, March 22, 2011 · Naples Dan, Ne.. ,..~ ,. W"~W"~_~"__O'.~'_".,_ ~ _.,",.,,,^_,.,^<." moo, -.......'."__,~mOw^_"_,___ _ < "''''_'m'H'".O.__~, n'_*"", _~H ,.. NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice Is hereby $liven that on TUESDAY, April 12. 2011. in the' Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration BOilding.. Collier County Government Center. 3299 East la. miami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners. will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinanc~ is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUN- TY, FLORIDA. AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COL. L1ER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPER- TY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR DEVEL- OPMENT OF UP TO 135,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN- D/OR A RETIREMENT COMMUNITY/GROUP HOUSING AT A FAR OF :60 AND/OR A HOTElJMOTEL.AT AN INTENSITY OF 26 UNITS PER ACRE FOR A 23.33 +/- ACRE PAR. CEL TO BE KNOWN AS THE ADDIE'S CORNER MPUD, LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF IMMOKALEE ROAO (CR 646) ANDCOUIER' BOULEVARD (CR 951), IN SECTION Z2, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COL- LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, . Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk. to the Board and are available tor inspection. All inter~sted parties are invited to attend an~ be heard. . NOTE: All ~sons wishing 'to speak.on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. 'The selection of an in- dividual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged, If. recog~ nized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted- 10 minutes to speak. on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials induded, in .the Board agenda pack.ets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to ,the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the -apprC!priate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to a-ppeal. a decision of the Boai'd will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto arid therefore. may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. which record indudes the testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal is based. If, you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to par. tiClpate in thiS. proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to yout to the pn:wision of certain. assistance.- Please contad the Collier County Facilities Management Depart- ment, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, BuitdinQ W, Naples, Florida 34112, (239}252~8380. _Assisted listening devices for the hearmg impaired are available in the County Commissioners' Office.. , aOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA FRED COYLE, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) M..rrh" '011 Nn1RQ4::jQ'i ~~1~' Packet Page -2649-