BCC Minutes 05/26/1981 R
"'''-_'''_'''''"''''~'' *_'0
. .
--"'-~-----""------~.--~
____._,..,J.
Naploß, rlørlda, MÐY 26, 1981
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commiooioners in
and lor the County of Collior, ðnd Ðlso ncting as tho Coverning
Doard(s) of such special districts as have been created accordIng to
law and having conductod buniness herein, mot on. this date at 9tOO A.M.
1n Rogular 508s10n in Building "r" of tho Courthouse Complex with tho
following memb~rs prascntt
CHAIRMANt John A. Pistor
VICE CIIAIRMANt Clifford \'Ienzol
C. R. "Russ· WIm~r
M~ry-Franccs Krusc
Dn" i1 C. Drown
I
ALSO PRESENT, WIlliam J. Roagan, Clerk, Harold.L.~Hall, Chief
Deputy Clerk/Fiscal Officer, Edna L. Brenneman and Darlene Davidson
(1130 P.M.), Deputy Clerks, C. William lIorman, County Manager Donllld
A. PIcbl0rth, County '&'ttornoy, Irving Derzon, Utilities MDf'lDger, Torry
L. V1rta, Community Devalopment Administrator, Thomas Hafner, Public
Eafoty AdminI3trator, Loo Lðyne, Planner, Jeffory Perry, Zo~ing
Director, Martha Skinnor, Social Services Diroctor Crace SpÐulding,
Adminlstr3t1ve Aide to the Soard and, Deputy Chief Raymond Barnett,
Sher1ff's Department.
pago 1
Bao~ 061 r^GE 631
.-,-.-..-,-----------...-----------------.-
~
,
""--.'.--,--..,.."
" . 1
-------------------------------_.'
May 2 t5, 1981
AGENDA - APpnOVED WITH ^DDITIOWS/D~LETIONS
Commissioner Wenzel moved, aocondcd by Commissioner Kruso and
unanimously carried, that the italicized agenda be approv~d with the
followIng additions and deletions I
1. Two additional items to be adðed under Proclamations.
2. Petition NZ-8l-2C, Board of County Comminsioncrs, roquo6tin9
amendment to ßo~t Dock Section of Zoning Ordinðnco -
Wit: hd r £I wn . .-
J. petition R-8l-SC, ~aldron Sundstrom, requoBting rezoning of
cortain M~rco Island Property - Withdrawn.
. 4. DiacuGsion of necessity of hiring consultDnt with respect
to powor probloms being cncountorcd in Data Processin9
Dep~rtment - ^ddod.
5. Appointment of Provider to rcpresent the Board on thc
Health Systems Council - Added.
6. Recommendation for approval of ExcavlItion Permit No. 59.121,
National Trust Company - Withdrawn at roqucst of petitioner.
7. Authorization for emergcncy purchase of EMS equipmcnt - Add~d.
8. Roquest for assistance with resurfacing of tennis courts at
Everglades City - Added.
9. Items listed under County Managcr'A Report - To be heard
at tho and of the agenda.
10. Authorization to hire p~rt-time socretarIal employee - Add~.
11. Consideration of extonding Board vacation to includo the
first two weeks in July - Added.
-.I
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF MAY 5 AND MAY 12, AND OF SPECIAL MEETING
OF MAY 8, 19B1 - APPROVEDt APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF
MAY 19, 1981 - Df.FERRED
Commissionor Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
unanimously carried, that tho minutes of tho Regular Meetings of May 5
and May 12, 1981, and of the Special Meeting of May 8, 1981 be
Pðg e 2
BOOX 061 PAGE 637
~
~----'------------:-----~----------_.,
~
"--",,_....,..,_.
.
.
. .
1_"----__ -....1_ _ ____ _ _____ _ _ __ ___-:...._____---'___ __ ~
BOO~ 061 PAGE '638
May 26, 1981
approved, and that the minutes at tho Regular Meoting or May 19, 1981
be deterred.
EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS PRESENTED TO ROAD DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES ALVAREZ,
PAR~M^N AND HUTTMAN, AND TO IMMOKALEE INSPECTION DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE
nENDny
Chairman pi.tor presented tho following 5-YQar Employee Service
Awards, with appreciðtion, to the following individua1s1
Jorgo Alvðrez*
Willie rarkman*
Horman Huttman*
Betty Hondry
5 Years
5 Yaara
5 'x'eðrs
5 YOc!lrS
Roðd Departmont
Road Department
Road Dep/:lr tment
In9pection Department
(Immok£llo~)
* In ðttendance to receive the aWDrd.
PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION OF RETIRING DEPUTY CLERK BRENNEMAN -
ADOPTED
Following the reðding of sarno by Chairmðn Plstor, Commissionor
Brown moved, soconded by Commissioner Wimer ðnd unanimously carried,
that the Proclamation in recognition of retlrin~ Deputy Clerk Edna L.
Brenneman, Recording Socretary, Board Minutes and RecordG, be ~doptod.
-
. .' ~'r
,
PaC,] 0 3
"
-------------------------------------
'r-,
c=J
,~
~
--_.....;
:
, .
I . . · . '. .
, . .' .
. . .
------~-------.---------------'--:-"~
c.:}o~ 061 PAGE '640
May 26, 1981
RESOLUTIONS 81-125 THROUGH 81-134 IN APPRECIATION OF EFFORTS or VARIOUS
COUNTY FIRE DEP^RTMENT6, SOUTH TRAIL FIRE DEPAnTME~T, AND OIVISION OF
FORESTRY DURING ReCENT WILDFIRE FIR~FIGHTING ACTIVITIES - ADorTED
FollowIn9 tho reading of 8ðme by Chalr~an Plator, Comœlasioner
Wonzel moved, seconded by Commi8.ioner Kruse and carried, that the
following Resolutions In appreciation at the efforts of the various
County Fire Dopartmonta, the South Trail Fire Department, and the
Division of Forestry, durln9 tho recent wild!i,e firefighting activl-
ties, be adopted¡
Roao1ution 81-125 - Isles of Capri
Re601utIon 81-126 - Golden Gate
Resolution 81-127 - Marco Island
Rcsolution Bl-128 - East Naples
Resolution Rl-129 - North Naplos
Rcsolution Bl-130 - Ochopee
Resolution 81-131 - Big Corkscrew Swamp
Resolution 81-132 - Division of Forestry
Resolution 01-133 - South Trail
RosolutIon 81-134 - Little Hickory/Bonita Shores
Page 4
---------------------------------
, ,
':"--'
c::J
'-"
.--1
· I
-----------____________-.-J_________
May 26, 1901
SOCIAL SERVICES CAnE NO. W-8075 - ^PPROVED
Conlmi8sioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissionor Kruse and.
carried by unÐnimous vote, that Social Sorvicos Caøo No. W-8075 be
approved, as recommended by Social Sorvices Director Martha Skinner.
ORDINANCE 01-27 RE PETITION R-nO-41C, WAFAA ASSA^D, REPRESENTING
~IMBREL, BURNS ^ND C^LLANDER, REQUESTING REZONING OF PROPERTY ~NOWN AS
"WILDWOOD EST^TES· - ADOPTED WITII 5TIPUUTIONS, PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT
TO C^PC STIPUL^TIONS - ACCEPTED
Legðl notice hovin~ boen published in the Naplos Daily Newo on
April 25, 1981 (pre-dated April 26, 1901) aR evIdenced by Affidavit of
Publication filed with the Clerk, public haaring WðS oponed to consider
Petition R-80-4lC, filed by Wafaa Assaad, ropresenting Kimbrel, Burns
and Callander, requesting the rozoning of proporty known an ·wildwood
Estates" .
Planner Lee Lðyne located the property under petition for rezoning
from "^" ^griculturo to "PUD" Planned Unit Dcvelopment on the map
displayed as that area shown in yellow and which i3 located on the
North Side of Davi8 Boulevard, NorthwQst of the Twin Drive-In Theater.
Ma. Lðyne said that the petitioner is proposing a 710 unit rental
multi-fa~ily dovolo~ent with accessory neighborhood commercial uscs.
The Coðatal Area Planning Commission recommended forwardIng tho
petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval subject to the
staff's stipulÐtions, with additional stipulations concerning sharing
in the cost of tho installation of a traffic signal, and a reatrictlon
pertaining to ðcceos to the commorciol ðreð, ðS follows I
1. Change USCG in the commercial aroa to those of the
Convenience Commercial rather than the GRC District.
Page 5
600K 081 PAGE 651
--------_._-_._.__...-..._-----_._._-_.._--------_.._.~....... --- ~...-......
;
t
'--'~"'-
~
.'-"-' .~_._--------
.-------.-- -----------_._- ~
BOOK 001 PACE 652
.
May 26, 19B1
2. Change Goneral Retail Commercial on Page 8 (PUD documont)
to Convenienc~ Commercial.
3. Devoloper ahall, øubjoct to FDOT approval, pay hi. appro-
priato' share, aB dotermined by the County Engineer, for the
cost of the inatal1ðtion of a traffic signal on Davis Boule-
vard whon deomed warranted by the County Engineer. The
aignal shall bo owned, oporated.and maintainod by Collier
County.
4. The only ðCC0150 to the commercial tract shall be via the
main entrance to the developmont.
5. Sidewalks shall be located on both sidos of the entrance
road up to the e~st/west loop road and along one side of
the loop road.
, .
Ms. Loyne said that a memorandum, dðtod Kay 22, 1981, has been
rec~lvad from Utilities Manager Berzon listing stipulations which are
missing from tho staff stipulations and from the PUD document.' Ho
Asked that the following additional requiremonts be included in the
rocommcndationa and tho subjoct documentt
1. That tho extension of the water main from Radio Road
to the project oite ohall be coordinated and approved
by the Utility Division.
2. That the on-sito wðtor distribution and sewage r.ollaction
facilIties shall be deeded to the County and, where necessary,
leaned back to the devolopment, prior to any connections being
made to thoso water and sower facilitiesl and that connection
to County-owned central sower facIlities will be made when
6uçh facility is made available.
3. Prior to the issuance of ðny building permits, all applicÐble
water and sewor system developmont charges will be paid.
The petitIoner's representative Wafaa Assaad, of the firm at
WIlson, Miller, Barton, SolI' Pcck, Inc., informed the Board that the
developer hos agreed to all of tho stipulðtions by tho Planning
Commission, tho stll!f,ðnd by tho Utility Division. lie pointed out
that the particulars of the developmont wore presented during the
Page 6
~--------------------:----------.----
~ -,,-~"\
c.-:J
---,
.,~".._""-,.".
, . ,
_________ ______ ----------_-..4_- ......___
Mð y 26, 1981
hoaring on the petition for an amondment to the Comprehensive Plan.
Thero beIng no one registered to ðddross the Board rcgardin<;¡ tho
petition, Commissioner Wonzol moved, soconded by Ccm~iD9ioner Brown and
unanimously carried, that the public hearing bo cloGod.
Commiasioner Krus~ moved, scconðud by Commissioner Brown and
carried 4/1 with Commissioner Wenzel voting in opposition, that the
ordinance, ao numbered and entitled below, be adopted and entered into
Ordinance Book No. 12, aubjoct to the ðbovc-refercnced stipulations of
the staff, the CAPC, ðnd the Utilities Manager, and that the
Petitioner's Agreement to the CAPC stipulations be accepted.
ORDINANCE NO. 81-27
AN ORDINl\NCE ^MENDING ORDINANCE 7(,-30, TilE COMPRE-
l!ENS~VE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED
AREh OF TilE COASTAL AREA PLANNING DISTRICT DY ^'MEND-
ING TII1': ZONING "TL/\S ~'^P NUMßER 50-26-2 DY CHANGING
TilE ZONING CLASSIFIC^TrON FROM "A" AGRICULTUnr. TO
"PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT O[~ THE FOLLCWING
DESCRIBED pnOPERTYI A PORTION OF SECTION 4, TOWN-
SHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EASTI ^ND DY PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DhTE
Page 7
BOO~ 061 PACE 653
-----------;--------------.--,-----
, . .
. . .
~
.
'--.,'
----~--~--------~-------~------_..
May 26,1901
RESOLUTION 81-135 VAC^TING 6' f.^SEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 15 AND 16"
BLOCK l85~ GOLDEN GATE UNIT 6, REQUESTED BY DONALD E. AND PHYLLIS
^. POWLESS - ADOPTED
Lftgal notico havio<) bcen publishod in the tJilp10Ð Dally tJOWß on May
10 and 17, 1981 as evidonced by Affidavit of Publication filed with tho
Clerk, p~b1ic hearing was opened to considr.r a request by Donald E. and
Phyllis !I. Powle£B for tho vacZltion of tho (iI' Easements betwoen Lots 15
and 16, Block 105, Golden Goto Unit 6.
Public Works Administrator/County Engineer Barksdalo reviewud
briafly tho pertinent information contained in the Executive Summary
dated April 29, 1981, commenting that letters of "No Objection" have
been received from the utility companies, tho fact that the Engineering
Dßpartmont hðs inspected the lots and hns determined tho casements aro
not required for drainage p~rposos, and, also, the fact that the Water
Managoment ^dvi50ry BOZlrd has administratively approved the vacation.
No persons were registerod tó spook on tho subject, whereupon
Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
unùnimously carried, that tho public hearing be closed.
Commissionor Wonzel movod, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
cilrried by unanimous vote, that Resolution 81-135, as detailed above,
be adoptQd.
Page 8
ßOOK 061 PACE 655
-------------..-...-...-----....- ..,.......-- . -..... -......--..
.,.. ..,.-----...-....
t
,...._._~,,,...,',"--
- ------ -- ---------- --_&-_--- -- - - --'
MlI Y 2 G, 19 a 1
RESOLUTION 81-136 VACATING DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN THE DOnCHESTER ANC
GrWSVENOR SITES, PELICAN DAY UNIT ONE, PETITIONED BY WILLIAM T. BIGGS -
ADOPTED
Legðl notice having been pUbliÐhod in the H.:1plos Daily UeW8 on MlIY
10 lInd 17, 1981 liB evidencod by ~ffidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, public hearing WDS opened to conaidor tho petition filod by
William T. lIiggs requesting the vllclItion of the Dra inago Ea8cment
~ithin tho Dorchoster Site and the Grosvenor Site in polican Bay Unit
One.
Public Works Administrator/County Engineer Barksdale explained
that the developers hnvo rededicated a Drainage Easement similar to the
ðrea which is being roleasod aB compensation for the,vaclltion. A
letter of "No Objection" has boan received from the Polican Bðy
Improvement District, aaid Mr. Barksdale, adding that the Water Man-
lIgement Advisory Board has revicwod the petition and approved it
administratively. The staff recommendation is for approval, concluded
Mr. Barksdale.
There were no registered spoðkers, whereupon Commissioner Wenzel
moved, seconded by CommiGsioner Brown and unanimously carried, that the
public hearing bo closed.
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and
cðrried by a unanimous vote, that Resolution 81-136, vllcating Drllin~ge
Easements on certain peliclIn Bay properties, be adopted.
pag e 9
~OOK 061 PAGE 657
,
----:--- -:--------:-:----7"""t.~- -.-- ----.-------.
~
\
'-"-~~""".""""';"
.--- ---------------""---.-------------
BOOK Oöl PAGE 660
May 26, 1981
PETITION BD-8l-2C, J,&,MES HEBERT, REPRESENTED BY COLLIER MARtNr.,
RECUeSTING EXTENSION OF BOAT DOCK TO 461 ON LOT 50, UNIT 1, ISLES OF
CAPRI - DENIED
Logol notice having be on published in the Naplee Daily ~ewa on May
10, 19B1 a8 eviðencoð by Affidavit of Publication tiled with the Clerk,
public hearIng was held to consider Potition BD-8l-2C, tiled by Jamea
Hebert, representod by Col~ier Harine, Inc., requosting an extenaion ot
a Boat Dock to 461 on Lot 50, Unit 1, Iolos of Capri.
Planner Lee Lðyne reforred to the Executive Summary dated ~bY 14,
1981 to explain the reasons why the petition is being recommendod for
denill by both tho Coastal Area Planning Commission and the staff,
among them the fact that it is felt that another dock at the subject
location would bo too intense for Ð single family lot.
Hr. Larry Barnhart, of Collier Marine, Inc., representing the
potitloncr, oxplained that the purpose for tho extension is to moor ð
sailboat, pointing out the physical characteristics of tho adjacent
properties, 48 well an displaying p1ctures illustrating tho spanse of
the wBtor l1nd the location of the existing dock. fie emp:lllsiz8d the
need for ð longor dock and the fact that the watcrway 1s woll ovcr 1001
in width at the subject location.
It Wð~ noted by County Manager Norman that there wore no persona
regiBtored to spoak on the issue, whoreupon Commissioner Wimer moved,
seconded by Commissioner Henzel ond unanimously carriod, that the'
public ~earlng be cloned.
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner ßrown, that the
potition be approved. As a rosult of the requested roll call vote, tho
motion failed 2/3 with Commissioners Kruso, Wenzol and pintor voting in
oppol!li tion.
Pðge 10
---------~-----~-----~---~-------
"".~"--""
-
~
----'
r·..···..~~
/ . ,
-- --------------------------- ---....
Mð y 2 6, 1 9 0 1
RESOLUTION 81-137 HE PETITION BD-81-3C, '.rIIOM^S CONRAD, REPREGENTED BY
COLLIER M"RINE, INC., REQUEGTING EXTENSION OF flOAT DOCK TO 80' ON LOT
134, UNIT 2, ISLES O~ CAPRI - ADOPTF.D
Legal notice having been published in tho Naples Daily News on
Hay 10, 19B1 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filod with the
Clerk, public hcaring was opened to consider Petition DD-OI-JC, filed
by Mr. and Mrs. ThomlSs Conrnd, requesting' tho Qxtension of a Boat Dock
to 80' on Lot 13-1, Unit 2, Islos of Capri.
Planner Leo Layne roviewed briefly tho information containod in
the Executive Summary dated May 14, 1981 wherein the reasons lor the
petition bein9 rocommonded for approval by tho Coastlll "roa Planning
Commission and tho ataff arc set forth. She voiced agrooment with
Commissionor Wcnzol'a statement that, i: it were not for :tho dock, the
arelS would be just n ~ud fl~t, adding that the extension should have no
detrimental affect on tho safety of other boators in the aroa.
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wonzel and
carried unanimously, that tho public hoari~g be closed.
Commiasioner Wimer moved, scconded by Commissioner ~enzcl and
unanimously carried, that Rosolution 81-137 with regard to Petition
BD-OI-3C, a~ ðetailed above, be aðoptod.
Filed for the record ware several pictures of the ðrea taken at
low and high tidos.
BOOK 061 PACE 66f
Pago 11
----:------:------ ----:-- ~-----:----.------------I,--' .
,;
~
"""-"'"''-'''"'''''.'''''''''
~
..~-.__.._....-
", n _ _, ...... ~, _ a
_. ,u__ .., .
BOOX 061 PACE 664
.
May 26, 1981
RESOLUTION 81-138 RE PETITION BD-8l-4C, ~EITH EDWARDS, REPRESr.HTED BY
COLLIER MARINE, INC., REOUESTING EXTENSION Of BOAT DOCK TO 44' ON LOT
51, UNIT 1, ISLr.S OF C^PRI - ADOPTED
Legal notico having been pUbliGhcd in tho'Naples Daily News on
M4y 10, 1981 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, public hearing wan opened to consider Potition BD-8l-4C, filed
by Mr. and Mrs. Koith Edwa~ds, represented by Collier Marine, Inc.,
requesting an extension of ð Boat Dock to .,." on Lot 51, Unit 1, Isleo
ot Capri.
Planner tee Lðyne reviowed the Executive Summary dated May 14,
1981 to explain tho reasons why the petition is being recommended for
approval, including the differenco in the Staff Roport dated April 29,
1981, recommonding an extension of 32' inatead of tho requested 44'.
She saId that the chango was made pursuant to the additional informð-
tion presentod at the Coactal Area Planning Commission hearing on M4y
14, 1981, at whIch time the CAPC recommended npprovðl with ð maxImum
projection ot 44'.
No persons having regiotered to speak, the public hearing was
closed upon motion by Co~m18sionÐr Wimer, seconded by Commissioner
Wenzel and unanimously carried.
Commio~ioner Brown moved, ßecondod by Commissioner Wenzel and
unanimously carried, that Rosolution 81-130, portaining to Petition
BD-Bl-4C, be adopted.
Pago 12
~--------~-----------~-----------
",
, .
r-"I
,
'-----'
r71
.,....-.............
~
;- -- - -:-- - -""':""'- - - --:- - ~,..- - - - --:-- -:-- --.- - - - - - - - - - -- - ~
, . ,
------ ---------- - ------------- ---...
MIJ Y 2 G, 1901
PETITION NZ-8l-2C, DO^RD OF COUNTY CO~MI5SIONERS, REQUESTING AMEN~1ENT
TO TilE DOAT DOCK SrCTION OF TilE ZONING ORDINl\NCE TO INCLUDE COMP1EI1'=IAL
FACILl'rIES - WITIIDRA',.;N
Legal notico having been publiahcd in the Naples Dl\ily NeW8 on May
6, 1981 a8 evidonced by Affidavit of PublicatIon,filed with the Clerk,
public hc~ring waz openod to consIðer potition NZ-8l-2C, filed by the
Coord of County CommIßGioners, roquestin~ on ðmond~ent to the Boat Dock
Section of the Zonin~ Ordinance to include commercial facilities.
Pursuant to the requcst by the Constal Aro^ Planning Commission,
Commissioner Wimor moved, soconded by Commissioner Wenzel and carried
by unanimous vote, that tho public hearing be cloned and tho subjoct
pot it ion withdrawn at this time.
ORDINANCE Ol-2l RE PETITION R-8l-3C, FRANK KLEY, REPRESENTED BY WAFAA
ASSAAD, REQUESTIlJG REZONING OF CERTl\IN PROPERTY TO BE KNO\'¡N l\S "RIVEn
BEND" - ADOPTED, SUDJECT TO STIPULl\TIONS, PETITIONER'S ACREEMENT TO
STIPULATIONS - ACCEPTED
Legal notice having been published in tho Naplos Daily News on
April 24, 1981 aD cvidenc~d by Affidavit of publication filed with the
Clork, publIc hearing was opened to consider Petition n-8l-3C, filed by
Frank Kley, requesting rezoning fro~ "A- and "A-ST" to "PUD- for
property located on the south side of Tower Road, east of the KOA Camp,
and known a8 -River Bend".
Planner Lee Layno locatod the subject parcol on the map displayed
and said that the potitioner is proposing a multi-family devolopment
with 78 units at a dcn5ity of 2.~ units per Acre with provIsions for a
tire station site and for open space and preservation areas. The
petition i8 being recommended for ðpprovnl by both the Coastal Area
Planning Commission and the staff purSuAnt to tho conditions set forth
in the Executive Summary dotod May 14, 1901. Furthor conditions would
BOOK OÖ1 PACEB67
Pðc:l0 13
:
,
---------------------------------
BOOK 001 PACE 668
Ma y 16, 1981
have to be aatisfiod by tho Utility Department, said Ma. Layno, a.
containod in the memorandum dated May 22, 1981 from the Utili~ie.
Mana9~r ~o the Community Development ^dmini8tr~tor, which are included
in the recommendation for approval and for inclusion in the PUD docu-
mont, aa followøl
a) That the Rookory Bay Utilities, Inc. Ðubrni~ rates for
sewage troatment services to the County for review and
approval by tho Board of County Commiasioners.
b) That tho force main and on-sito sewage collection
f~cilitIeB be dedicated to the Coun~y and leased bnck
to the Utility for operation and maintenance, if the
rates aro approved, and until such time AS the County's
central scw~r servicos are extended to this aroa.
Mr. Wafaa ASDðad, representing the firm of Wilson, Millor, Barton;
SolI & Peck, Inc., informed the Board that the dovelopers are in
agreement with all of the stipulatIons imposod by the staff, the
Planning Commission, and by tho Utilities Division.
Thero were no registerod speakers, whereupon Commisnioner Wenzel
moved, seconded by Co~missioner Brown and unanimously carried, that the
public hearing be closed.
Commissioner Wenzol moved, 'secondod by Commissloner Brown and
carried ~/l wtth Commissioner Wimo( voting In oPPoDitIon, that the
OrdInance, An numbered anð entitl¿d below, bo adopted and entered into
Ordinance Book No. 12, subject to the stipulations imposed, and that
the petitioner's Agreement to the CAPC stlpulations be accepted.
Page 14
.,---- ------_._------------------~-----.--
. .
"
'~-,
--
!I
-
-
---
. ,
--------------------.-------- -----.
Mðy 26, 1901
ORDIN^NCr. 81-20
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDIIIANCE 76-30, THE COMPRE-
HENSIVE ZOUING R~:GULA'l'IONS FOR TilE UNINCORPORATED
....REA OF TJiP. COASTt\L AREA PLANNING DISTRICT BY "MEND-
ING THE ZONING ATLAS ,.IAP NUMBER 51-2r;-2 flY CIIl\NGING
THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FI10lo\ -A" AGRICULTURE AND
~A-ST- AGRICULTURE SPECIAL TREATMENT TO ·PUD" PLANNED
UNIT Df.VELOPM8HT ON TilE FOLLOWING DESCRIDED PROPERTY 1
PART OP NORTIIF.:AST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSIIIP 51
SOUTII, fV\HCE 26 EAST, AND DY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE
~OOK 061 PACE6S9
Pago IS
___:---- _____ - - --:-_ _______-.___ - - --- -- - - - ~ I
. .
~
,
''''''^--'''''''-;~''''~.
...-..."....."..""""-.
- - - --- - ------.----- ------------ ----..
Mny 26, 1981
PETITION R-OO-42C, SEAGO GROUP, INC., REPRESENTED BY INK ENGINEERING,
INC., REQUESTING REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY TO BE KNOWN AG "CYPRESS
IIE^D· - DENIED
Legal notice having been published in the Naplc!! Dally NOWB on
, '
\
^pri1 24, 1981 as evidenced hy Affidavit of Publication filod with tho
Clerk, public hearing wa~ oponed to consider potition R-BO-~2C, filed
by tho Soogo Group, Inc., requosting rezoning from various zonas to
·PUD· Plannod Unit Development, for property located botween Old and
Now US 4l, and known as ·Cypross Hcnd".
Planner T.eo T.ayn& located tho proporty on the map displayod,
pointlns out th.,t caat of tho f1ubject proporty, ia zoned Industrial,
60uth i3 zoned Commorcial, part of the property to tho cast is also
zoned Agrlcultl,ro, including some of the proporty to the west, which
~lBo has some ~GRC· zoning. She Goid that the Coastal Arca Planning
Commission hold their public hoaring on May 14, 1981 and that the
petitioner had only ono point of disagrcement with the Star! Report,
that baing tho roquiromont of the Utility Divi~ion that s~wor systom
development chargos ~UBt bo paid by tho petitionor prior to the
!ssuance of building permits. The C^PC did not feel that this was a
legitimate stipulation, said Ma. Layne, since the petitioner is
providing his own sewage troatment plant. lIowever, she continued, it
was pointed out by the Utility Division that It is the requirement of
the pertinent ordinance and that it is being paid by other developments
Buch a8 Imperial and Victoria rark, the fees to be used for plant
expannion only and is to tho beno!it of tho petitIoner. She noted that
a ~emorandum has been received from UtIlities Managor Irving eerzon
~oo~ 061 rACE 67f
Page 16
.... -..-- - -'-' .--..-... ~
-......- .-....-....... ._....._....._.-...._~----_.__._._--.- ... .... ...-.-....
~
~
- ------- -------------------------_..~--
MD~ Oöl PAct 67Z
May .26, 1981
pertaining to the matter and suggesting that tho lasuo be clarified
during the Board's hearing.
County Attorney Pickworth inquired if the dev~loper's aewage
treatment system will eventually be hooked into tho County's North
N.!Iples' system with Me. La yn. .!Idvising thð t, in the PUD documen t, there
ia a statQlllent that they will connect so, apparontly, there 18 a
requirement to this effect. Attorney Pickworth co~mented thðt, In such
event, It would not be fair to allow the devolopors to "skip" tho
development charges.
Mr. JameB Jack, Ink Engineering, Inc., representing the
petltioner, explained that they wera not familiar wi~h tho requirement'
being discussed and that they wanted to be assured that their ~ituation
is the same as others. If so, sðid Mr. Jack, they will go along and
accept it. Mr. Jock pointed out thðt thoro is no guarantoe that tho
County's system will bo extendod to the site, although it i8 understood
that long-range projection3 aro that it will be but that it could be
five to eight ye"rs into the future. He said that they :'Iave no
objection to
paying thoir due share of tho development fees but that
they ðrc concorned about paying the fee "up front". It is felt, said
Mr. Jack, that it would bo appropriate to pay such foes when thcy have
the bonefit of tho system and not at tho same time they ore paying for
their own facility.
Chairman Pistor mentioned that one of the major concerns is that
funds are availðble for the development of tho treðtment plant, and tho
like. Responding to Cornmi8ßionor Kruse, Mr. Bcrzon said that tho
stIpulation in no different than for any other devolopment. Mr. Jack
observed that, in this cnae, they would not argue that they should be
Page 17
'..
,
----- - --------------- ---- ----_.---
, , .
, .
,.---,
-
...----,
I 1
-----...
-.,
--
--,,---_....'.
___ ---J____ _ ________--:0-_______ ____ __ _ _ _..
Ma y 2 1;, 1 9 81
treatod otherwise and, in reoponse to Chairman Piator, said that they
will ðgroe. Ms. Layno read tho pertinent portion of tho PUD documont
indicating tho developor's willingnooð to comply.
Thoro wan no further discussion, whoreupon Comminsioner Wenzel
movod, secondoð by Com~isðioner Brown and unanimously carried, that tho
public hearing bo cloned.
Comm1ooioncr Wenzcl moved for donlol of the petition, motion latcr
withdrawn when Commisoioner Brown moved for approvÐl. Commissioner
3rowo's motion died for lack of ð second.
Commisnlonor Wenzel again moveù that tho petition bo denied with
the comment that there arc no funds for schools, ronda, Courthouse
oxpansion, lInd the like, provided. Com,¡issloner Wil!1cr sqcondcd the
motion which carried 4/1 with CommIssioner Brown voting in opposItion.
RESOLUTION 81-l39 RE Pf.TITION V-81-10C, M.T. CLUB, INC., REQUESTINC
SETBACK VAnIANCF.S FOR CON;,TRUCTION OF C^RPORTS AT M^nCO T~~ER5, ISLES
OF CAPRI - ^DOPTED
Logal notice having been pUbl1siJed in the Naplcs Daily News on
May 10, 1901 as evidenced by Affidavit of publication filed with the
Clerk, public hearing was opened to ~onsidcr Petition V-BI-lOC, filed
by the M.T. Club, Inc., requesting a variance from the required 34'
side and 35' front yard setbacks in order to locate cðrporta 5' from
tho side lot linos and 10' from the front property line.
Zoning Director Perry explained that Marco Towers Is an existing 8
story condominium at the southernmost end of the Isles ot Capri and
that the petitioner foels that tho proponod location of the corports
will be moro aOBthet1cally ploasing and will disturb the loaot amount
of exiatin9 mature V09ctation. He referred to tho ExecutIve Summary
BOOK
001 PAGE 673
l.-
.
Page 1 e
----------------,---------------_..
;
~
. - - - - -- - - ---- - .--. - - - -.. -- -- -- - -- -- - - -- --þ----
&OOK 001 PACE 674
May 26, 1981
dated April 27, 1981, with the accompanying sketches, to provide ~or.
dotails on the project and .lso commented thnt the petitioner hae
obtained lotter's of "No Objection- from the adjoining proporty ownor.
to the proposed carport. Mr. Porry further advised that the Iales of
Capri Fire District ^ðvisory Board, having reviewed the request, stated
in their letter dated March 26, 1981 to the petitioner that they prefer
the location of the structures in the site being suggested rather than
in t.he middle of tho parking ðrea tor eoso in' responding to e~er-
gancie. .
County Manager Norman reported that Mr. Jack Wenner, representing
the H.T. Club, w~s present but declined the opportunity to addrcss the
Board. Commissioner Wimer moved that the public hearing be closed.
Commissioner Wenzel soconded the motion which carried unanlmously.
CommIsnionor Wimer moved, oeconded by Commissioner Wenzel and
carried by unanlr.1ou8 vote, that Rosolution ,81-139, relðtive to PetitIon
V-8I-lOC, be ðdopted.
"
Page 19
--~-------'-------------r---------
. ,
'''-',
-
~ '"l
~ --..,
,
-
,
__ _____ _ __ _ _.._ _________ ___________-1.
MlI Y 2 Ii, 1 9 8 1
JOINT "~SOLUTION AND ACRCEMBNT 01-140 FOR EXTENSION OF CAPRI WhT~R
WORKS, INC. fR!lNCllrSr. TO SERVE CREATIVE LANE APARTMENTS I"nOJECT -
hDOPTr.D PURSUANT TO STAFF R~COMMENnATION
Logol notice having bean published in tho Naples Daily News on
Mðy 10 and 17, 1981 aD evidonced by ^f!idllvit of Publication filod with
tho Clerk, public hooring waD opened to consider tho roqucst by tho-
Capri Watcr Works, Inc. for lIn extension of their frllnchine area to
include the CrclItlvQ Lðno Apartments project area.
Utilities Manðger Irving Berzon roferred to aðrial photographs to
point out tho existing FranchiEc arells liS wall as the ðreaß being
propoaod for expansion for the Creative Lane Apartmonts project liS well
liS for the Quail's Roost project, which,will be ~ddresged later. The
Executive SummDry dated MlIY 13, 1981, sðid Mr. Berzon, provides the
statistical data with regard to the cðpacity of the utility, and the
like. iJc noted that represontativos from tho utility firm woro in the
audioncft to provide ~dditlonal Infor~ðtion on the lIvailability and
adequacy cf thu water supply. When asked by Commissioner Wenzel for
his opinion as to whether or not he believos there is sufficient
supply, Mr. Bcrzon roplied thllt, based on the infvrmation available, he
would say "ye's·, adding that there would bo no Eurplus. Mr. Berzon
said he bases his opinion on - 1) The utility will, hopofully, be
purchased by the County in the near future7 and, 2) It not purchased,
the franchise-holder has the potentilll for increasing the treatment
fllcility lInd tho groundw~tor supply to improve their reserve capacity.
Chairman Pintor com~cntcd on the restriction5 prosently in effect
in the Franchise area pertaining to sprinkling and inquired about who
is to blðme it wDtcr cannot bo supplied. County ^ttorney pickworth
responded that tho utility haG the obligation to p:ovide the service,
BOOK 001 PAGE 679
po1qe 20
-----:-------- --.------:-----'-----------'""
~
\
-- - -. -- - - . -. -.. . ... ... -.
.. . __4 ._ ...._ __...__..... . .. _ -__..__.__,.._______..____.._
BOOr. 001 PACE 680
Ma y 2 6 , 1 9 81
adding that the granting of the Franchiso doe. not warrant that the
water is thore.
Thoro was a discus.ion concerning the shortage of water during
which Mr. Berzon ooid that steps are beinq taken to improve the pumping
facilities which should provide 80me rclief to tho area. However, he
said that the problem is not the availability of water into the house
but rather the amount which is being used for irrigation purposes which
is beginnin~ to be felt allover the County duo to the drought.
Messrs. Fred Partin, Paul Endris and Attorney Robert Neina., all
representing the utility co~pany, were preaent to respond to the
concerns which have been expressed. Mr. Partin agreed with Mr.
~crzon's stntements, commenting that the normal consumption has doubled
bocause of the sprinkling activities. He said that authorization has
been given by the Board of Directors to engage an engineor for the
purpose of provIding recommendDtions for improvements to the pumping
c~pacity in order to make suro that the problem does not occur during
the next dry season. Mr. Neinoß said that the Capri Water Works has
had ð moratorium on new hookups for the past three years. The utility
is unjor pre-existing obligatIon to serve both of the aforemcntionod
projects and it is felt that thore is suffIcient watcr available, based
upon the developments' projected needs, until such time DS the County
taken over the utility.
Commivsioner Wenzol moved, secondod by CommissIoner wimer and
cnrried unnnimously, that the public hearing be closod.
Commiosloner Wimor moved, oeconded by Commißsionor Brown And
cDrriod ~/l with Commissioner Wonzel voting in opposition, that the
staf! recommendation be approved, i.a. based on the information mAde
Pogo 21
---------~----------------------------
, "'···....~I
,--.,
, I
-
-------------------------------_....~
Mðy 26, 1981
available by tho Utility, the Franchise should be o~tondoð as requastod
ðnd be limitod to 230 dwolling units, the demand of which the Utility
ia presontly able to moet, and, that Resolution and ^greement No.
81-140 authorizing the extension bo adopted.
PAgO 22
~OOK 001 PAGE 681
---,,---.- -- -- - - --------:-------------- -- -.
~
,
------------------------.--.. .,... - -.-....
BOOr- G01 PÂGE 684
Ma y 2 6, 1 9 81
JOINT RESOLUTION AND AGREEMENT BI-14l FOR EXTENSION O~ CAPRI WATER
WORKS, INC. FRANCHISE AGIH:EMENT TO SERVE QUAIL'S ROOST pnOJECT -
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO STAFF RECOMMENOATION
Legal notice having buen published in tho Naples Daily Hews on May
10 and 17, 1901 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, public hoaring was oponod to consider the extension of the Capri
Water WorKa, Inc. Franchise area to include thQ Quail's Roost project.
There wore no porsons registered to Bpeak on the matter and, due
to the subject having been discussed in conjunction with the previous
agenda item, Commissioner Wimer moved that the public hoarin9 be
closed. Tho motion was seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and unanimously
carried.
CommIssioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
carried 4/1 wIth COr.\missioncr \-lenze1 voting in opposition, that the
staff recommendation be approved i.e. based on the Information
provided by tho Utility, the Franchise be extendod to include the
Quail's Roost project with the stipulation that the Agreement dated May
2, 1974 betwoen the Utility nnd tho property owner, at that time, be
reviewed by the County Attorney 'and Ddjudged binding upon the County,
and, that Resolution and Agreer.\cnt 01-141 authorizing the extension be
ðdopted.
Pðg8 23
- - -- - ----------'--~----.--------r----
"...,._'-"'~\
"""--"'-f
I ' ,
---'
~.~.............,
I
-----'
--'
'''~~,'".",,'~''.'''.'<-' '.',',""
- - - -~ - - -- - - - - - - - - --:. - - - - -- -- - -- - - -- --.
May 2(" 1981
ORDINANCE 81-29 RE PETITION R-81-4C, WYNDEMERE FARMS, REQUESTING
lIMENDMENT TO NOf1TIII'IEST POnTION OF W'x'NDr.r.Ef1E PUD - ADOPTED, SUBJECT TO
8TI PUL^TIONS, INCLUDING TIIO~ìf~ OF UTILITII:S ~'ANAGr;f1
Loglll notico havIng been publiaheð in the Naples Daily Naws on
April 24, 1901 as evidenced by ^ffidavit of Publication filod with tho
Clark, public hearing was opened to consider Petition R-OI-4C, filod by
Wynðemcro Forms, requesting an ðmendment to the Northwest Portion of
the Wyndemero PUD.
Planner Lee Layno saId that tho petit10ner is proposing the
amendment to the PUD to allow 36 townhouses rather than 20
sIngle-family homes around the Inke and preserve the area at a density
of approximatoly 1.5 units por acre. shc locðted the Hp~cific arcn in
question on the map dIsplDy~d. The Coastal Area Planning Commis1ion
rocommondcd forwarding the petition to tho Aoord for approval, said Ms.
lAynE:, and ðdded that ð memorandum dated Hay 22, 1981 has been recoived
from the Utilities Manager roquesting that the following stipulations
bo included in tho staff recommendations for Board consideration:
a) All on-sito water distribution ðn~ sewage collection
facilities shðll be deeded to thu County prior to any
connections being made to these facilities.
b) All ðpplicahl~ nyatam development charges for wðtcr and
sewor shall be paid prIor to the issuanco of 6ny building
.permits; this in full compliðnce with appropriate County
Ordinances (prcsently Ordinance No. 80-94 - Water).
c. Compliance with Article ll, Section 2; requirement for
blank utility casin~s should not bG w~ivcd.
Ma. Layne read from the subject memorandum Mr. Berzon'g objection to
the petition, particularly to the sentence which stotos -If a
qovernmental agency serves the site, the wastewator colloction system
and tho water distribution Ðnd treatm~nt facilities shall be dedicated
to the 90vcrnmental agency", suggesting that the thought conveyed by
BOOK 061 PAGE 687
Pa98 24
__ ___________________4_........._ __ ___ _ ___ --.... -
,
------.------________ _______·.__w... _ _..... _ .~.
BOOK ODi PAGE 688
Hðy 26, 1981
tho languAge i. contrary to the Subdivision Regulations wherein it i.
stated that all on-site water distribution and a~wðge collection
facllitieü ~ bo dedicated to the County. It was pointed out by Hs.
Lðyne thAt the language in the prosent PUD document is language which
waD adopted by the Board whon tho PUD wao originally afproved. Also,
said Ms. Layne, the Subdivision requirement tor blank utility èasings
has ðlreody been waived by the Board (or the Wyndemero project.
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commi3sionor Brown and
unanimously carriod, that the public hearing be closed.
When requested to comment, County Attorney said that Hr. Serzon
"has hit tho nail right on tho head" and suggested that the Board take
clo~c noto of the comments contained in tho above-raferenced
memorandum.
Commissioner Brown moved, soconded by Com~iasioner Kruoe and
cðrri~d unanimously, that tho Ordinanco, ao numbered 3nd entitled
below, subject to stalf stipulations including those of the Utilities
Manager, bo adopted and entored into Ordinance Book No. 12.
onDINANCE 81-29
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 76-30, THE COMPRE-
IiE!lSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOn THE UNII~CORI'OR^TED
AREA OF THE COASTAL AREA PLANNING DISTRICT, BY AMEND-
ING TilE ZONING ATL/\S MAP NUI1ßEH 49-26-1. BY CHANGING
THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FnOM "PUD" PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON THE
FOLLOWING DESCRHlED PI10PERTYI SOUTII 3/4 OF (iECTION 19,
TOWNSIIIP 49 SOUTH, nl,NGE 26 EASTl AND BY PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE D^T~ '
RECESS. 10100 ^.M. until 10.0D A.M.
Page 2S
.----------------------------------
",
, .
,.-..,
I
-'
,...----,
I ,
'"--'
."-----¡
--..J
--------------------------------- -..
Ma y 26, 1981
PETITION R-81-SC, W^LOnON SUNDSTROM, REQUESTING REZONING OF CERT^IN
MARCO If,LAND PROPERTY' - IHTltDR^WN ^T nr~OUf.f,T or PETITIONEn
Logal notice having boon published in the Nnplcs DlIily News on
April 2~, 1981 lInd in tho Marco Island Eagle on May 7, 1981 as
evidenced by ^ffidavit5 of publlcntion filed with tho Cler~, public
hoaring was opened and immediately cloßod and tho petition withdrawn
upon motion by CO~~i8sioner Wenzel, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and
carried 4/0 with Commisoioner Hrown not present, pursuant to Memorðndum
dated May 14, 1981 from the Planning stðff wherein it was stated that
the petitioner, Waldron Sundstrom, requÐsted, during tho Coastal "rea
Planning Commlßsion hearing on May 14, 1981, that the petition be
withdrawn.
RESOLUTION 81-142 RE Pf.TITION V-Bl-9C, Tllf. DELTON^ CORPOR^TION,
REQUESTING FRONT Y'^RD SETBACK VARI^NCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF
G^TEHOUSE ^T SOUTH SF-AS CONDOMINIUM PROJECT, MM\CO ISLAND (CONTINUED
FROM ~AY' 19, 19A1) - ^DOPTED
Legal notice having been publishod in the Naples Daily Nows on May
3, 1981 and in the Marco Island Engle on May 7, 1981 ðS evidenced by
Affidavits of publication previously filed with the Clerk, public
hearing was continued from May 19, 1981 wIth regard to petition
V-8l-9C, filed by The Dcltona Corporation, requesting a front yard
setback variance to permit the construction of a gatehouse at the South
Seas Condominiulo project, "\arco Island.
Zoning Dlrectc~ Perry explained that, pur9uant to Board directive
during the hearing on May 19, 1981, that Ð plan has boen worked out
with the potitloner indicating that the subject gatchouse would be
moved out of the intersoction adj~cent to tho project, a~ WAS
originally proposed, and relocated toward tho front property line. Mr.
80DK 061 PAGE 689
Page 26
-- - --:-- -- - - -- - ---: --- - - --:---- - --- -.-- -- - - ---
,
.._---:-;----------------------------
aoo~ 001 PAGE 690
Hay 26, 1981
Perry requoÐteð that, if the plan meets with the Board's approval, that
it be with the atlpulatlon that the final site plan be approved. Or,
if the BOArd wi~hes to .e. the plan, Mr. Perry,said that the mðttor
could be furthor continued. It was noted that the petitioner's ropre-
aentativQs were not, as yet, present.
Public Works ^dmlniÐt~ator/County Engineer responded affirmatively
to Commissioner Wenzel's question as to whether or not the plan met
with hia approval, whereupon the Commissioner4 having been informed
that there were no persons registered to speak on the matter, moved
that the public hearing be closed. Commisoioner Wimer Ðeconded the
mo~ion which carriod 410 with Comminsioner Brown not present.
In responso to Commis~ioner Wimer'3 inquiry if the aite in
question would interfere with tho 5' beachwalk area which is under
dispute, Mr. ßarksdnle said that it would not, adding that the plan
that has been worked out io a much better one than that which was
previoualy presentod.
Commissioner Wenzel moved that tho revised plan be approved, and
that Rcnolution BI-l42, granting tho 34' variance which placos the
gatchouso on the property line of the subject project, be adopted, as
recommendod by staff. The motion was seconded by Commissionor Wimer
nnd carrlnd 4/0 with Commissioner Orown not present.
Pago 27
--- ---------'-----------------------
, ,
,. ..."__....c1
I
~
=:J
Ma y 2 G, 198 1
PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR ENVIRONMENT^I. cm~SULTING SEnVICES WITn SELWYN J.
BEIN (CONTINUeD rTIOM M^'i 19, 19B1) - ACTION FUnTIlf.n CONTINUED UNTIL
NEXT lice MEETING
County Manager Norman reported th~t, pursuant to noard diroctive
of May 19, 19B1, n meeting WlIS held with Selwyn J. Bein on May ?'2,
1981. lie sldd thðt the contract which was prepllred and agrced to by
Mr. Bei!') io similar to tho one which the Board hocJ with Dr. Jay Ilarmic,
former Environmental Consultant however, thore are two changes in-
valved - one of which delIne~tes the responsibilities of the
Consultant, ....hlch Mr. Norman reviewed for the Boord, and the othor
chango is the deletion of formor Paragraph 7 pcrtl1inin~ to roviow of
Environmental Impact Sti1tomcnts upon tho advice of the County Attorney
due to the fact that the matter is covered by othor ordlnancos rnd
would not bo opproprio~e for inclusion in tho subject contract. Mr.
Norman said that it is being proposed that the salary roquested is
$32,000 por year, or $1,640 more than the amount specified in Dr.
Harmic's contract for 1979/80, commenting thllt the proposed amount is
consistent with the adjusted amount which would normally have been
implemented for Dr. lIi1rrnic hðd ho not reaigned. The benefit package
would be the same AS was previously provided, continued Mr. Norman.
Mr. Norml\n added that Mr. Boln has recently learned that he is being
considered for a full deanship for all of the science departments on
the campus ...·h~rQ ho is now employed - the North Campus of the
Mlllmi-Dðde Community College. This would be an honor for Mr. Boln and
would encompass ð substantial increase in compensðtion, said Mr. Norman
and, ðG soon as Mr. Boin 10 informed, he will notify the County. It
was Mr. Norman's suggestion that, if the Board RO desires, the contract
can be authorIzed for execution in tho form being recommended lind, aa
~OOK Obl PACE 693
Page 20
. -_....~~-_..'~-_....-.. - -...--..-.. ._- .-.----...--.-- ._~._..- --.,.- ---.--...-......- ..
\
'-""~'''';'''-''; _"""_;'8
-------- --_____-:._____________--.J___
BOOK ODl PACE 694
May 26,1981
aoon as Mr. Saints signature i. obtained, it will be "roðdy to go·.
Commissioner Wenzel moved that, undor the circumstances outlined,
the contract ba reconsidered at the prosent time and consideration bo
given to candidate Mark ~. Benodict aa a direct County Employee undor
the Pl~nning Director, without Ð contract, at a salary at $7,000 lOGs.
Mr. Norman requested ~hat if the Board wishes to mako the person a
atatf member, that ho be directed to proceed with tho usual process in
torgs of evaluation of tho job for final salary reßourcos and
personnel, pointinq out that only preliminllry screening has been done
with no background investigation on any of the candidate~.
Mr. Egon Hill expreosed his opposition to the hiring of outgidora
when there is an excellent staff alreðdy in existoncc. However, if
thore isn't such porson for the position under di$cussion, Mr. Hill
suggoBtcd that a qu~lified individual bo hired as a staff member, om-
phaaizing the need for the pogition.
ChaIrman Pistor explained that It is somotimes necessary to hire
outsiders, concurring with Commissioner Wimer's concept that, under
certain conditions; a mora thorough study o~ projects can be obtnined
than If done in-houso. Howevor, he oxpreosed hia concorn over hiring ð
person at $1,600 more than the previous consultant was being paid and
ßaid that, after a review of the rCßumes recoived, it in pOBoible one
of tho other candidates has II broader viewpoint thDn the ono beIng
considorod. He Baid that he would like to have the staff conduct
interviews during tho period when the Board will not be ~eeting and
provide recommendations on whom to hire.
Mr. Norman pointod out the advantages of having a consultant for
spocialized kindg of knowlodgo which Is not available in an organiza-
tion. ~mong them tho fact that ð parson's judgment would not bo Gwayed
pago 29
~ ------------------~-------------~
, ,
, ,
,........,-~
I
--'
~
--....-,
_""-'''"--"^''''''''',,~,,'''''''-''''<-''''' ..._,,", ~
, .
_ _ __ ____ ______ _ _________ ___ ____ þ~4
May 2ú, 19B1
by preD6uro from the County Monngor or othoro 1n tho County organiza-
tion, although this haD not beon ð problem in tho past. He ððid that
the best protection to koop that from occurr1n9 would be tho cAreful
suporvision of tho County Managor ovor what he doeD and does not do in
termo of providing support and diroction for what is a very highly
technical position and one where independent judgment in important.
Commisaioner KrunQ pointed out that tho Board is again going ovor
a matter which was discussed the ¡..reviouß wack whereIn 1I motion waG
mðdc to negotiate a contract which cnrriod by n 3/2 vote. 5ho sug-
gested that tho only qUQstion open to nC90ti~tlon In the $1,600 extra
over Dr. lIarmic's contract which, liS was noted'by Mr., Norman, is ap-
proximatoly the increoDe provided other omployeoa for cost-of-living
rùiscs over a two-year np^n.
Commissioner Wimer offored tho SU99~stion that, since Profossor
Duin haD another job offer, that the matter be deferred until a
decision hos beon made.
Comrolnslon6r Wenzol restated hin motion that tho subject contract
be reconsidered that tho Board consider Mr. Benedict's $7,000 or less
otfer aD a direct County employeo undor the Planning Director, and a
report be forthcoming in July. Chðirmon plstor eeconded the motIon.
It was pointed out by,Mr. Norman that the salary that Mr. Benedict
indicoted Hould bo acceptablo to him equates reasonably close to the
$32,000 figure when othor benefit coste arc added in.
The motion failed 2/3 with Commissioners Wimer, Kruse and Drown
voting in opposition.
Commissioner wimer moved that action be deforrad until tho noxt
Board meeting. The motion woo seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and
carriod unanimously.
ßOOK Ofjl PAGE 695
Pðge 30
-~----~--~-------~--------~-------
. . .
~
~--- ---- -------- ------------ - -- ---
BOOK Göl PAGE 696
May 26, 1981
RESOLUTION 81-143 TO RECOVER FUNDS ExrENOtD BY COUNTY TO ABAT~ PUBLIC
NUISANCE ON LOT 9, BLOCK C, LITTLE IlICKORY SHORES - ADOPTED
Commissionor Wenzel moved, .econded by Commissioner Wimer and
unani~ouGly carried, that Reoolutlon 81-143, to recovcr fundo expanded
by ~he County to abato ð public nuisance on Lot 9, Block C, Little
lIickory Shores, propU'ty o....ned by Char1e. E1sebough, be adopted.
"
paCíJe Jl
--,---------------------------------
. I " ' " , :
..---,
-"
¡---,
:...-.
...-
---.
\
__ __ ____ ____ _-A-- _ --=-_......:..,_,:-_...:.-..- ___ __ _--=.. ___
eOOK Oö1 PÂCE 698
Ma y 2 5, 19 81
RESOLUTION Bl-14~ TO RECOVER FUNDS EXPENDED BY COUNTY TO ABATE PUBLIC
NUISANCE ON LOT 2, BLOCK 396, UNIT 12, ~^RCO ISLAND - ADOPTED
Commissioner Wenzel movod, seconded by Commissioner Wimor and
unanimously carried, that Resolution 81-144, to recover lunds exPended
by the County to a~~te a public nuisance on Lot 2, Block 396, Unit 12,
Marco Ialand, property owned by Charles F. Roberson, be ðdopt.~.
Page 32
.... -.---- ---------------------------
, ,
",
, ,
':--1
Eat); ,.....
,¡.".,",'J'"
, , ., ,
c=J
· .
.._"-- ----- ------- -----_--:-------- ----
~co~ üöl f~~E 700
Mð y 26, 1981
RECOMMENDATION TO EXCHANGE EXISTING PLANNER II PO~ITION FOR I\DMINIS-
TRATIVe ASSISTANT I POSITION IN DIVISION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -
"ppnOVf.D
Pur8u~nt to briof oxplanðtion by Community Development
AdmIniatrator Terry Virta, Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by
Commissioner Wenzol and unonimou9ly carried, that the existing Plannor
II position, preQQntly vacant, be exchanged for Administrativo Asoist-
ant I position in tho Division of Community Development, bo ðpprovod, ,
as recommonded by staff in the ~xocutivo Summary dated May 19, .1981.
EXPENDITURE OF $0,500 FOR ADDITIONAL FIELD SURVEY AND ADMINISTRATIVE
WORK RE SOUTH ONf.-HALF SEWER AHr.A "8" PROJECT - AUTHORIZED'
Co~misgloner Wimer moved, seconded by Commißsioner Wenzel and
carried unanimously, thðt an additional expendituro of $0,500 for the
field survey work and admlnistrðtive work connected with the prep~ra-
tion of tho legal doscriptions for the required utility oasemonts
within the South Onc-lIalf of Sewer Area "B",·be l'Iuthor1zed, pursuant to
staff rpcommendation in tho Executive Summary dated May 5, 1981.
"COITION OF $4,725 TO TOTAL PROJECT COST RE WILLOUGHBY ACRES WATER AND
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ^REA FOR ~~INTEN^NCE OF FIRE HYDRANTS - APPROVED
UtilitIes Mnnnger Irving Borzon explained that the Board is being
requosted to authorize the addition of 10\ ($4,725) of the construction
cost of th~ fire hydrants in tho willoughby Acres area to tho total
project coat and resulting assessment of the project duo to the North
NDples Fire Control District rule th~t they must receive thin amount
prior to the acceptance of tho ownerahip and rcsponsibility for tho
Maintenance of the hydrants.
Commissioner \ilmer moved, seconded by Commiaaioner ~Ienzol and
unanimously carried, that the amount of $4,725 be addod to the total
project cost of the Wð'ter and Sewer Improvements in tho Willoughby
Pðg 0 33
.... -- -- - ---- ------------------------
.' -l
c=J
:=J
--- - ---- -.--- ------------..--- -- -- --...,
Ma y 2 6 , ~ 9 81
Acr.. area for the rcasons statod in tho Executive Summary dated May
14, 1981.
Co~misslonor Wimer naið that he has roceived many calls from the
area's residents who aro much ðppreciativo of tho wðy the project has
proqresaed with a minimal amount of problems. lie expressed his thanks
to everyone involved.
UTILITY EASEMF.NT FOR l\UGUSTA \"00D5 CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AREA - l\CCEPTED¡
RECORDATION MJTIIOTU7.ED
Following brlof cxpl~nation by Utilitlos Manager Borzon,
Commissioner Wenzcl moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried
unanimously, that tho Utility Easement document for tho Augusta Woods
Condominium project arCD, in ardor to permit the installation of ð
water meter to sorve the prbject, be accepted and authorized for
recording in the Official Rocords.
~oax Oö1 fACE 701
PA90 34
---------------------------------.
\
_ _ _ --:..- _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _...1..-_ _-...:...-- ---"'- - - - -- - --------
6CO~ 001 PAGE 704
Hay 26, 19B1
UTILITY EASEMENT FOR TH~ HAMPTONB, KINGS LA~E UNIT 1 - ACCEPT!D,
RECORDATION AUTHORIZED
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Com~la8ion.r Kruse and
cðrr10d unanimously, that the Utility Easement documont for The
Hamptons, Kings Lðke Unit 1, primarily for the installation of a water
~etQr to serve the project, be accepted and Authorized for recording in
the OffIcial Records, pursuant to staff recommendation.
(Easement not received in
Clerk's office as of 6/10/81)
'-
Page 35
.~ ---------------------------------
, .
",
:::=J
c=J
;-. -, ,
"-----"
--- -- - --------------------- -----.,.-
May 26, 1981
WATER AND SEHER F^CIT.ITIES WITIIIN THE RF.TRF.^T PHASE I - lICCP.PTED POR
ONE 'iE^R MW'rEN^NCE1 rn:COrWATION OF Pf.flTINf:NT DOCUMENTS - ^UTJ!OnIZED
As recommonded by the Utilities MDnager, Commissioner Brown movod
that the Hator ~nd ~Qwer Facilitioß within Tho Retreat Phoso I be
acceptod for one-year maintonanco, and that the legal documents bo
authorlzed for rocording in the Official Records. Following a brief
discussion regarding the pay~cnt of impact fees during which Mr. Berzon
advised that ouch foes are not collected until Building Permits Are
roquested, the motion wns seconded by Commissioner WImer and
unanimously carried.
!he following liot of documents was Eubmitted to tho Clerk's
office for recording 1
1.
Bill of Sale for the Water Facllities.
Blll of Sale for the Se we r Facilities.
Quit-Claim Deed for the \o!ater FlIcllities.
Quit-CIa im Dced for the Sewer Facil1tic3.
^ffidavit of No Liona for the Water lInd Sewe r
Facllitica.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. Certification from the DER for bactoriological
clearance for tests on the wator lines.
7. Lab results on the bacteriologicðl testß for the
water lines.
8. Certification concerning contributions in-aid of
any conatruction.
9. Results of pressuro testing of the w~ter lines.
10. ^ copy of the inflow/infiltration te8t~ for the
Bewer linea.
11.
Results of pressure testing of. the sewor lines.
Verification of final cost tor the newer 8Y8tem~
Verification of flnc'1l cost for tho Wð ter lines.
Leg a 1 doacr i ptlon.
12.
13.
14.
BOO~ 001 rAGE 705
Page 36
---~-------~-----~~-~-----------_..
.
,
·- - --- - --- - -- -- - ------'-----------------"---
BOOK Obl PACE 706
Moy 26, 1981
15. Contractual Guarant.. for material and workmanship
for Q period of at leaat one (1) year ðfter the Boord
of County Commisaioners' acceptanco for both water and
sewer facilities.
16. tAtter from the Firo District regarding ownership and
maintcnance of fire hydrants.
17. Lettor from the Engineer of Rocord cortifying that all
wðtor and sewer facilities are located within the public
right-ot-way or dcdicatod eascments.
18. Letters tram the Engineer of Record certifying that all
water and sewer facilities are constructed in substantial
compliance with tho plans Ðnd specifications and as shown
on the "As-Built" drawings.
19. Payment of wator uß~ge charge for filling and flushing
water, numbcr of times filled and flushed, plus total
number of gallons used.
20. Recorded easement granting ri~ht-of-wðyn to lines and/or
system within private propcrty i5 on the rocorded plat.
21. One (1) set of 1\s-[\ullt Drawings.
22. Copy of the recorded plat.
NOTE: See documents on pages 709-712
RESOLUTION GW-Bl-5 APPROVING WATER PURCII1\SE AcnEE~IENT BETWEEN GOODLAND
W^TER SYSTEM AND DELTON^ UTILITI~5, INC. - ADOPTf.D
Commissioner Wenzcl moved, ,seco~ded by Commissioner Wimer and
carried by unllnimous vote, that j'~e30lution CW-8l-5, approving tho Water
. Purchase Agrocment between the Goodland Water Syatnm and Doltona
Utilities, Inc., be ~l'dopted, pursuont to recommendation by Utilities
Managor in his Exccutivo Summary dated May 13, 1981.
PlIlJO 37
.:--,..--- -----------------.------------
,
"
. '
, .
';-"!
c::::J
:---,
--'
--""-"~",.~",,,,,-,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,, ....
, ,
---------'--------------------------
May 26, 1981
^DDITION^L ~XPENDITURE~ TO COV~R CONSULTING ENGINEER'S FEES RE GOODL^ND
W^TEn SYSTEM PROJECT - APPHOVED, PUH;'UANT TO STAFF' nf.CO/',~IEI,ID^TION
Pursuant to explanation and recommendation by Utilities Manager
Bcrzon, an contnlned in the Executive Summary dated May 13, 1981,
Commissioner Wimer moved, secondod by Commisioner Wenzel and carried
unanimously, that additional expenditures to covor tho Consulting
Engineering fees, with regard to the Goodlðnd Water Systom projoct, be
approved for tho topo ðnd boundary aurvey ($2,000.OI), ûnd for
obtaining the v6rioua permitß ($1,524.86), which were necessitated due
to rclocating the site from tho ~irk property in Coodland to the DOT
propcrty at the Goodlond Bridge.
CHANGE ORDEn NC,. 3 IN TilE MIOUNT or: $G, 000 TO PROVIDE FOR MODIFJ~^TIONS
TO EDUCTOR-AIR BLOWEr! ST1ITIONS WITHIN ,.'ARCO SEh'ER PHASE I IMPROV¡:"IENT
AREA - APPROVED
Utilities Managcr Borzon commentcd that there has been some dis-
pleasure voiced with the appcaranco of the eductor-air blower stations
within the Marco Gewer Phase I Improvemont aroa and that the approval
of Chango Order No.3, in th~ amount of $G,OOO, will provide for making
certain changes to tho installations, permitting them to be lower and
consequently lcss con£picuoua. In rcsponse to Commis9ionor Wenzel, Mr.
Berzon said that the pipes can onl¡ be landscaped up to ð reasonable
hoight, noting that the way the pipes are stacked now they go up 7' to
8t abovo the existing ground and, therofore, ~and8caping is difficult.
The r~commendation, said Mr. Borzon, in Cor authorization of the
estimated amount at monoy and added that the costs will be kapt down to
less thðn that if possible.
Commissioner wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel, that
Change Order No.3, aD dotailed above, b. approvod in the amount ot
$6,000.
'BOOK Oöl fAGE 713
ra g ~ 38
..--------------------------------- ---
,
--------------------------------
BOOK
Oól,PAGE 714
Mo Y 26, 1961
Mr. Ira Evðns, reproÐenting the Marco Island Taxpayers'
Msociðtion, asked that opprovol o! tho Change Ordor be deforrod or, 1!
Approved, that it bo conditionðl on the proposed correction being
discusoed with the people whc arc directly affected. "0 8uggosted
that, perhaps, thore are other altornðtivos availablo and that the
poople ðro entitled to have Gomo "say· on how it is done. Part of the
problem, Goid Mr. Evana, was that no one was aware that such "things·
wero part of the installation and evary e!fort should be made to
ðccommodate tho way tho people f~el the situ~tion should be corrected.
Furthormore, said Mr. Evans, he would ask that approval be conditioned
on a careful segrcgation of the costs sinco tho sðma options existed at
the timo the sYGt~m was designed and the costs to correct the condition
is not propcrly ð part of tho assossment to the individuðls and the
aSGessmcnt district.
Chairman Piator said that ho understands Mr. Evans' state~ent8 ðod
assured him that the matter has boen under investigation for several
months. Commissioner Wimer said that, if Mr. Evans hoc an objection to
tho motIon on the floor, he would withdrð~ it. Mr. Evans reiterated
his opinion that thoro is more than one way of accommodating the
problem and rCllowed his rcquest that the various options be discussed
with the tlpproximatcly l2 paoplo involved. Commisslonor h'cnzel moved
that Mr. Borzon and the EnginQcr get together and talk to the affected
individuals and prasent their proposal for approval. Thore was no
second to the motion.
Mr. Borzon said that Mr. Evðns is corroct, at least in one
respect, In that there is another option - the contrast betweon what is
being proposed and thðt option being 8pproxi~ðtely $30,000. The
option, h~ said, is to rolocate thn facilities to the rear of the lot
Page 39
---------------------------~--~---
'.
, .
..-.....---
.---,
,
--
'It.,' .____________________------.-----------.
. . . . .
, .
--- - - ---- ----- ---------------_...._-~.
Mo Y 2 G, 19 A 1
linos. lie quoßtioned where Mr. E....ano woulr1 suggest that payment for
the additional canto come from. ~~en asked by Commissioner Wenzel, ~r.
Evans oaid that he waD not one of tho 12 individuals affected. The
Commissioner offered a motion that the mattcr be tableò if that was thu
dosire at the Board. Thoro was no GQcon(\ing of tho r.1otion.
Mr. Williðm Barton, representing the,Consulting Engineoring firm
of Wilson, Miller, Bôrton, SolI L Peck, Inc., said thot he would bo
glad to confor with the property ownersl however, he said that it would
be appropriate for tho Board to approve the propoa~l. He said that the
reason it was not done in such manner originally was because, from an
engineering point of view, it is less desirable becðuGo it 1s going to
raise the maintenance costs somewhat, explaining why this is so. He
ßaid that it was an accoptable trade-off rocognizing that aesthetics
'~ust be considered. It w~s Commissioner Wimer's suggestion that the
people decide if they wish to havo the pipes relocated and pick up the
assessment involved. Mr. Barton obsorved that such ðcsessment would be
spread over ð number of people on Marco Island to satisfy a fewl
however, that i9 a docision Cor the ßonrd to make.
Commil!lIsionar Wimer declineù to offer Q new motion, whereupon
Commiosioner Drown ~ovod that the Board authorize an oxpenditure of up
to $6,000 to revise the air intake system on tho blowor stations 80
that they aro les8 offensive than they Are at present. Commissioner
Kruso seconded the motion.
Mr. Berzon r'enowt'ð his offer to meet with any of the persons
involvod and try to convince them that the stop being proposed is a
step in the right direction and, in responso to Commisaioner Kru~e,
t>DD~ Ofil PÀ~ 715
Page 40
.
,
. .. -... - -
.._.. .,--- --... ...-.... - - .- - -. . -...... --.. -...... - ...- .,." . '-- --- .-. - - - - --
BOOK 0 DiPACE 716
Ma y 26, 1961
aaid that there aro ð total of 720 users in the ent1re project. COlli"
missioner Xrusc offered the comment that ahe "would hate to have to
.~ddle them with $30,000·.
Upon call for the question, tho motion carried by unanimous vote.
Co~mi8sioner Wimer offered the suqgestion that funds be put into
the budget for landscaping purposes.
,
. .
=:J
C3
..---------------------------------
Page 41
:=J
-- - ------ ------------- ----.------ --_.~_..
BOO~ 001 rACE 718
May 26, 19B1
RESOLUTION 01-145 RE UTILIZATION OF GOOD WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICES
DURING CURRENT DHOUGHT - ^DOPTED
County ^ttorney pickworth o~?lainod that tho proposed resolution
has been drafted pursuant to Boord request which he said rec09nizea the
present drought and urgos the citizenry to voluntaril~ reduce their
consumption of water and to institute good wator conservation
practIcesJ and requesting the Bi9 Cypress nasIn Bonrd of the South
Florida Water Management District, togethor with the District, to
examine the 8Itu~tIon and impose mandatory reductions i£ they deem it
necessary.
Commissioner Wonzel moved, seconded by CommIssioner Wimer and
unönimously carried, that Resolution 81-14S, as dotailed above, be
adoptod.
"
,
Page 42
T--------~------~---~--~---------
,
",
r=-l
c::J
r--\
..-
, '
...____________-.600____.a...-______________
,
MO~ Ob1 fAr¿ 720
May 26, 1981
DIGCUSSION OF WATER PREGDURE PROBLEMS ON MARCO ISLAND - REPORT ON
AVAILABLE OPTlmlS TO fH: fORTIICOMING AT NEXT BCC MF:ETING
Commissioner Wimer co~mented that, in view of the sevoro water
pressure problems on ~rco Islanð, perhaps oomething should be dono to
restrict Borne building there until the ßituation is corrected.
utilities Manllger Borzon s'aid that, in the ðpplicðt'I~¡1 review proceeo,
factual information is so ug h t out ond, in the case of Marco Iolðnd, tin
in-depth analysis wile done of what the wðtor resource cðpðbllity Is,
bllsed primarily on the r e po r t prepðred by groundwater geolog 1sts
Missmer and ASBociatos. It is their contentIon, continued Mr. Berzon,
that there are up to 14,000,000 gallons of water available, however,
there is not that much treatment cDpability nor trðnsmission capability
at tho prosent time. It is arguod that Marco Island is running out of
water for the sarnO reðsons that the Isles of Capri people are running
out, he said, and that is the ðmount of water being used for irrigation
purposca. He suggested that It is a le~al question as to whethcr or
not the Board can restrict any building pormits because the irrigation
demand the public is placing on the system cannot be satisfied. He
ê,said that the pormitting agoncy for the utility's consumptive use
pormit, tho South Florida Wator Managemont District, met with repre-
sentatives of Dcltonn the previous week and, apparently, could not find
adequate ovidence thDt they could not meet the demand. lie added that
when the agency feels that there is l\ thre~t to the groundwater supply,
either through soltwater intrusion or through othor stresS08 on the
RYHtem, tho people will bo told to cut back mandatorily.
Pðg It "3
~_._-------------------------------
'-"--'~'."'\
_.,-~
I ,
_I
,...--¡
-
------------------------'----'-------
May 26, 1981
Co~mi8sionor WImer said thAt ho would like to 80e tho situation
rectified and that he is willing to stop ~ll multi-family and com~
mercial building permits until the utility fulfills its obligation,to
build ~n adequðte water treatment system. County Attorney Pickworth
advised that the proposal ~ight be an approach the Boðrd could take,
howover, ho cautioned that it would bo the type of thing that would bo
the end product of a thorough investigation wherein the Boord would
have justifichtlon for concluding that such action is necessary.
Tho diacußslon continued covering such aspects as the reported
leakages in the ßystem and the claim that they havo boen corrocted,
whether or not consideration h~s been given to a dual syatem for
transmitting trcated and untreated water for irrigation purposos, tho
fact that tho Basin Board has said that they would request only
voluntary and not compulsory curtailment, and other pertinent facets of
the problom.
Commissioner \oiimer moved that there be a full report on tho
subject at tho noxt meeting, whore time for a lengthy discussion is
available, and that no building per~its for multi-family or co~mercinl
purpoacs bo issued on Marco Island until that time. Attorney rickworth
commented that he does not think ·you can make that stIck", adding that
he could 'do some research on it.
Commissioner Kruse inquired if a rostriction could be imposed,
through the Building Department, to enforce the installation of
water-nnving devices on any new construction. Commissioner Wenzcl
observed thl1t the Building Code could be revised in this regard.
Attorney Pickworth said that there ðrc various regulations which tho
government can put into effoct, howovor, the water-saver approach is
aoOK 001 PAGE 72f
P~g e 44
_h_~-__~-__-_~---~~--~---~_~------·
~
,
-~-----------~-~-----~-~--~--~---
~ooy. 001 PAGE 722
Me y 26, 19 a 1
~oro legally dofonsible than ð building moratorium.
Commißsioner Wi~er said that tho problem of the leck of water on
Marco Ioland has been ongoing and he is willing to take whatever riaka
are necessary to force oeltona to correct the situation and asked that
the record reflect this and, also, that his motion to this effect dlod
for lack of a Gocond. Chairman plstor emphaslz~d hio desiro to take
whatever action p050ible to k~ep from running out of water on Marco
Island but expressed his concorn over posnlble legal ramifications
involved in ð mO~ðtorium.
Mr. Berzon said that he would havo a report at the next meeting on
whatever options aro avaIlablo.
RESOLUTION 81-146 RE PETITION V-81-5C, RACQUET CLUß OF NAPLES,
REQUESTING 5ETDACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF SIGH - ^DOPTED
FOLLOWING MOTION TO RECONSIDER, ACTION ~AKEN 5/19/81
Chllirmlln Pistor explained. that a rer¡uoB.t has been recoived from
tho Racquet Club of Naplen, for rcconaideration of the Soard action
taken May 19, 1981 donying Pet~tion V-B1-5C which was ð request for a
14' front yard setback varlancp 'to permit the conotruction of a sign
wwithln l' of a front property line on Tamiami Troll. It was pointed
out by County Manager Norman that the peti tloner was not present for
tha May 19th meet!n/] and tho ßO<1rd indicated that if he came in aftor
tho peti tion WðS acted upo n , he would be given tho opportunity to be
heard. Mr. Norman said that the roquest for reconsideration is con-
sistent with tho prior action of the coord.
Dr. Ronald Stahnke, preoident of the Racquet C1~b of Naples,
informed the Board that at tho prosent timo interested persons aro
having difficulty finding the establishment and, for this roason, it ia
Page 45
.---------------------------------
, . I
, I
r' ,.,'"".
~'
.---;
---'
, .
---------------------------------
Mo y 26, 1981
deairablo to place 0 algn on tho 3' strip of lcnd on Tamlami Trail
which, to his knowlodge, WðS laid out in tho plot plan for such
purpooe. He said that tho e!qn would be In conformity with oxisting
signs, and added that he has checked with adjacent buslnosBea and has
recoived no objections to tho proposal.
Zoning Director Perry recalled that, ,pursuant to the information
pro5cnted the previous week in the Executive Summery, the parcel is a
triangular-shapod piace of property and that the staff recommended
denial of the variance because thero is ample area to move the nign
bßck towards the building away from US ~1 and moot the minimum sotbßck
off the Costello Drive right-of-way. It was noted by Hr. perry that
the potitionor is planning to meet tho setback of US 41 but, obviously,
cannot meat the required 15' setback off Costollo Drive if the proporty
is only 3' deep at that location. Commissioner Wimor observed that, if
the sign waD relocated as suggosted, it could not be seen. with Mr.
Perry concurring with the ntatemcnt that that is the reDson for the
requested variance.
Commissioner Wimer said that he hOB inspected the site and moved
for approval of the varlanco with Commi3sioner Brown seconding tho
motion. Due to the circumstances, Commissioner Wimer withdrew his
~otion, replacing it wIth a motion for rcconniderðtion of the previous
ðction. Commissioner Wenzel seconded the motion which cDrried by
unðnimous vote.
Commissioner' Wimer moved, soconded by Commisalonor Brown that
Resolution 81-146, with rcgðrd to Petition V-8l-5C, bo odoptod. The
motion cðrriod by unðnimoua vote.
Page 46
WOK 061 n~m
---~--~----~-----~-~~---------~-_.
~
,
--------- ----------- -- _!-- - --~------~.
fl1ðy 26, 1981
FINA£. ¡\CCEPTANCE OF VMIOUS STREET!> WITIlIU MARCO ßf.l\CH SUBDIVISION -
^PPROVED
Pursuðnt to stoff recommendation as contained in the Executive
Summary dated MÐY 15, 1901, Comm1~sioner Wenzol moved, seconded by
Commissioner Wimor and unanimously carrieð, thðt'the following streots
within Marco Beach Subdivision be approved Cor fin~1 acceptance 1
, "
Harfiold Drive from S.R. 92 to Wintcrborry DrIve
UnIt 5
Unit 8
Wintcrberry Drive from SDrfiold Drive to South
Ilea thwood Dr ive
Un i t 9
CollIngswood Avonue
Conover Court
Cutler Court
Quintllra Court
Hammock court
A1l1micda court
salvar10rc Court
Fo rc ßt Cour t
^rcad ia Court
Sand Hill Street from Wintorborry to CuI-de-Sac
South Heathwood Drive from Wintorbcrry Drive to
Cul-de-Sac
BID NO. 486 FOR CONSTRUCTION Of PEDESTRIl\N AND DIKE Pl\THS AT VARIOUS
LOCl\TIONS WITHIN COUNTY - AWARDED TO M^C 1\SPIIALT, INC. IN THE N\OUNT OF
$690,044.05; STAFF AUTHORIZED TO ADD ACDITION1\L PROJECTS TO STl\Y WITIIIN
FUNDS AV1\ ILABLE
Legal notice having been publlahcd in tho Naples Daily Newn on
May 5 and 7, 1981 as evidenced by Affidavit of PubIicðtion filed with
the Clerk, bids relating to Bid No. 486 wore 'received until May 20,
1981 for the construction of Pedestrian and Diko Paths at various
locations within the County.
Pursuant to (ecommcndation contained in the memorandum dated Mðy
21, 1981 from Engineering Director Tom Kuck, Commissioner Wanzol moved,
soconded by Commissionar WImer and unanimously corricd, th~t ßid No.
406 for the aforcmontioned construction, including all of projects DW-7
Pðge 47
ßOQ~ 001 rAGE 71.7
---~---~-------,-,--,_._---
.
.
,____ __------.--------- ---------------:0
'..---
__'_ _ 1.--"'--'''------
~- "---,---,,,
..--,
~-
~OOK OB1 PACE 7'2.8 , ~
May ~5, 1981
through BW-23, be awarded to the low bidder, MacAsphalt, Inc., in the
amount of $690,844.05, that the stoft bo authorizod to add additional
projects to stay within the fundI available ot $775,000.00, and, that
the Board authorize tho Chairman to sign and tho Clerk to attest the
resulting ^9reement.
BID NO. ~R5 FOR RIGGS ROAD, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - AW~RDED TO BRISSON
ENTERPRISES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF t-lf,O,524.06
Legal notice having been publlßhed in tho Naples Daily News on
,
May Sand 7, 19B1 as evidenced by Affidavit of publication filed with
the Clork, bids pertaining to aid No. 485 for roadway improve~onts to
Riggs Road were roceived until May 20, 1981.
/'
i
Pursuant to staff recommondation, as contained in the memorandum
dated M~y 21, 19B1 from Engineering Director Kuck, Commissioner Wenzel
moved, aeconded by Commißsioner Wimer and unanimously carried, that Bid
No. 4B5 for the aforementioned project be awarded to the low bidder,
Brisson EnterprisÐU, Inc., in the amount of $160,524.06, and that the
Chairman be authorized to sign and the Clerk to attest the resulting
Agreement.
BOARD APPROVES STAFF RECOMHENDA'i.'ION Fon PURC!lASE OF ASPHALT PAVER,
COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS WAIVED, WRITTEN QUOTATION FROM II. F. MASON IN
TilE AMOUNT OF $01,520 - ,,"PPROVED
public Works Administrator/Engineor Barksdalo recalled that on
March 5, 1981 the 8o~rd approved a Budgot Amendmcnt in the amount of
$5,000 for tho purchase of an Asphalt Paver to be used by the Road
Dcpartm~nt in economically improving road and drainage condltiona. He
Baid that three quotations havo been received, the lowest quotatIon
being from the H. F. Mason Company in the amount of $4,520, ðS Bet
Page 048
",
':-ï
------
c:::::J
,.---,
'---'
~
----------------------------------..
"
---------.------------------------ .
Mo Y 26, 1981
forth in tho momorðndum datod May 10,1981 from thø purchosing
Director.
Commissioner Wenzel moved, soconded by Commissioner Wimer and
unanimously carried, that the BOArd accept tho staff recommendation
for the pur chace of an Asphalt Pavor, waiving tho compotitive bid
process, and accopting the writton quotation from H. F. Mason in the
amount of $4,520, and that tho Chairman be authorizod to sign and the
Clark to ottest the resulting Agrecment.
PLAT OF NORTH WAPLES ItlDUSTRIAt. P^RK - ACCEPTED FOR RECOnD^TIONI
PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE GRANTED, 10\ CASll BOND FOR MAINTENANCE SECURITY
ACCEPTED
Public Works Administrator/Engineer Barksdale rccalled that tho
Board approved the construction drawings and final plat for the North
Naples' Industrial pork on February 24, 1981 with the stipulation that
tho plot not be recordod until all construction was approved, or until
adequate conatruction security was posted. Tho devolopor has completod
the construction improve~ents, Baid ~r. Barksdale, and hos posted a 10\
cash bond tor maintenance security. The County Engineering Department
has reviewed the construction, he concluded, and Preliminary Acceptance
18 being recommended, as requested by the developer.
Commissionor Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse ond
unanimouoly carried, that the North Naples Industrial Park plat be
approvod,for recordin9, th^t Preliminary Acceptance of the project be
granted, and that the 10\ cash bond for maintenance security bo
approved.
BOOK 001 PACE 729
Pa98 49
~
,
·---------------------------------
600~ 001 PAGE 730
Hðy '26, 1981
EXCAVATION PEnMIT NO. 59.122, KINGa LAKE UNIT III, IN n7, TSOS, R26£ -
APP"OVED FOR ISSUANCE, WITH STIPULATIONS
Public Works Administrator/Engineer Barksd6le reviewed briefly the
contents of the Executivo Summary d~ted Kay 13, 1901 pertaining to the
request for an Excavation Permit for the construction of a lake which
will be used tor ".!Iter retention in Kings Lðko Unit III. He noted thðt
the Engineering Departmont's staff and the Water. Management ~dvisory
BOArd have reviewed the ayplication and recommend approval of the
\
issuance ot tho Permit with ~h. following st(pul~tion8&
1. All truck traffic to/from the excavation Is limited to the
atreeta in Kings LÐke between the oxcavation and S.R. 84.
2. Tho roquired bond and permit fecs must bo remitted -
BondI $15,000 pormit Foel $420.
3. No pu~ping off site.
4. All ðppliçðble provisions of Ordinðnce No. 80-26 shall be
adhered to.
In rcsponse to Commissioner Kruse'. query, Mr. Barksdale said that
if the excavation is in an area where it is felt that there is g01ng to
be a concern, monitoring the well for water quality can be ð stipula-
tion however, the ,lake under discussion is a small lake and it WftS not
felt to be a necesBDry requirement in this instance.
"
CommiBsionor Wimcr moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and
carriod 4/1 with Commissioner Wenzel voting in opposition, thAt
Excavation Permit No. 59.122 be approved for issuance to Kings Lake
Unit III, subject to the abovo-refercnced ðtipulationa.
EXCAVATION PERMIT NO. 59.120, EDWARD r. REYNOLDS, IN 834, T48S, R26E -
APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE WIT" GTIPULATIONS
Reforring to the lxocutive Summary dated May 13, 1981, Public
Work:i Administrator/Engineer Barkßdalo said that a request hðs been
Page 50
----------------------~---..,-....------
, ,
. ,
::=J
c::J
L-..:J
__,r-------------------------...
Mðy 26, 1981
recoived from F~ward F. Reynoldø for an Excavation Permit for the
construction of two fish ponds, reviewing briefly the pertinent data
concerning the proposed lakes. He sa id that the Engineering
Departmont's staff nnd the Water Managemont Advisory Board have
reviewed the application and rccommend approval of the Permit with the
following stipulations:
1. Depth of excavation shall bo limited to 121 below existing
ground.
2. No off-sito discharge unless permitted by South Florida
Water Management District.
3. Perimeter berm shall be required.
4. All applicable provisions of Ordinance No. 80-26 shall be
adhered to, particularly submittal of a bond for the permit
fee.
Commissioner Wimer moved, secondod by Commissioner Brown and
carrIed 4/1 with Commission'er Wenzel voting in opposition, that
Excavation Permit No. 59.120, for. issuance to Edward F. Reynolds, be
approved, suhject to the above-referenced stipulations.
RECOMMENDATION TO WAIVE COMPETITIVE BID FOR CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TO
REMOVE NOXIOUS AQUATIC GROWTH FROM MAIN GOLDEN GATE CANAL BY MECHANICAL
MEANS _ APPROVED¡ COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS WAIVED; PURCHASING DIRECTOR
AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE PURCHASE ORDER TO AQUAMARINE CORPORATION
There being no discussion following Public Works Ãdministrator/-
Engineer Barksdale's brief review of the subject, Commissioner Wenzel
moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and unanimously carried, that the
staff recommendation, as contained in the Executive Summary, be
approved with regard to the removal of excessive and noxious aquatic
plant growth in ð portion of the main Golden Gate Canal by contractual
service utilizing mechanical methodS, as follows:
\
Page 51
BOOK Oö1 PAGE 731
----.......--._---_._-----~-------_._------
~
,
·----------------------------------
~oo~ GD1 PÂCE 732
Mo Y 2 6 , 1 9 0 1
Based upon the one-source Bupplier o~ both equipment and
contract service Cor mechanical harvesting of aquatic plants,
that the competitive bid procoss be waivod, and that the
purchasing Director be authori~od to laBue a' purchase order
to "quamarlnc Corporation on A unit prico basis in an amount
not to exceod $6,000.00.
RESOLUTION 01-151 "UTIIOIUZJNG CII1\IRM1\N AND CLERfI: TO EXECUTE JOINT
PARTICIP1\TION AGREEMENT WITH FDOT RE PROVISION OF FUNDS FOR DeSIGN or
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM 1\ND PREPARATION OF GRANT APPLICATfONS -
ADOPTED
Public Works Administrator/Engineer Barksdale reviewed briefly tho
staff recommendation that authorization be given for tho execution of ð
Joint participation Agreement with the FDOT for a grant to provide
funds for Administrative Services to design a public Transportation
System and to prepare grant applications for Fedoral Capital and
Operating funds. Mr. Barksdale respondod negatively to Commissioner
Wenzel's query an to whether thoro would be any County funds involved,
and positively to Commissioner Wimer's inquiry os to whether or not a
system could be desiqned to fit the County's needs.
Commissioner Wimer moved, sp.conded by Commissioner Brown and
unanimously carried, that Resolution 81-151, authorizing tho Chairman
and Clerk to execute a Joint participation Agreement with the Florida,
Department of Transportlltion, as detailed above, be adopted.
County Manager Norman pointed out that the Administrative Services
employee would only become a permanent member of the County staff if
the Trðnsit Program is adopted ðnd that, if funding ceases, tho
position is torminðted. lie furthor commented that the 528,000 salary
figuro mentioned prcviously includos bonofits and related travel
oxpenses.
Page 52
---------------------------~------
. . .'
, .
:=1
CJ
--,
----
" . .
.____________.a..-_______-=--___________
&OOK 0 fj 1 PACE 734;
May 26, 1981
STATUS REPORT FOR COLLrr.R COUNTY F.MS BY PUBLIC S^FF.TY ^DMINISTRATOR
Public Safety Administrator Hatner reviowod the highlights of tho
Information contained in the Ambulance Syotum Status raport dated May
20, 1981 which covers the period from April 6 through May 7, 19B1, and
covorin9 such mattera as the total number of ambulance "runs, the
average responsG time, the types of runs, the vehicle status, and the
numbor of personnel involved.
In response to Commissionor Wimer, Mr. Hafner said that a recom-
mendation will bo forthcoming wIth regord to the establishment of
current foes for h~licopter trðnsport.
Commissioner Kruse inquired about the status of collections with
Fiscal Officer Harold Hall responding that they are coming in satis-
factorily, explaining that it takes from 30 to 60 dðyS to receive
payments, normally, which, for the most part, are insurance paymenta.
Commissionor Wimer asked if the prcsent stationing of the
ambulances is working out with Mr. Hafner stating that there ore only
about 6 woeks of statistics available on the runs and, with a sample
that small, it io difficult to make 8 decision at the present timG.
However, said Mr. Hafner, as the roport shows, the response time in the
City ie probably among the beet in tho State, adding that the rosponsos
average well below the 10-minutes contractual figure.
Mr. Mike Zewalk inquired if the public has been mado aware that,
even though the County has taken avec the system, thore is no -free
rido.. Mr. "afnor oxplainod thAt the appropriate persons are being
billod just as 1. done in a private organization with the 8ame
collection proceedings. County Attorney Pickworth added that It 18 tho
intent of tho County to fUe suIt, ,If necossary, in small Chims Court,
rag- 53
------------,...----------------------.--
. . .,
",
. .
. .
'C=J
r-:::-J
~
~
-----.-- ----------------------------...
May 26, 1981
os is ~oin9 done with rogard to the collection of sewor bills, and the
11ko.
Ch~!r~ðn pistor stðted that, 1n his opinion, the ~bulance
D1cICLGC, the EMT'a and Para MedicR, and othor personnel involved, are
doing a Line job, as the report 6hows, and inquired if there Is any
indicuLlon when the other two vehicles will be dolivored. Mr. Hafnar
aðid, t.hat, In his oBtimatotlon, it will be a minimum of eight weeks
b~fotO delivery can be expected.
'eOM~D !\!JTI10RIZES PUflCn"f,E OF NECESS^n'i SUPPLIES "'ND EQUIPMENT FOR EMS
/IIW I'!(¡:p,\nATION OF DUDGET AMr.ND~f.NT5
Public Safety Adminlstrðtor Hafner 'exploined that thore 1s a Ust
o( equipment which is still being retained by American Ambulancr, Inc.
and is tho subject of litigntlon between the County and the firm.
However, said Hr. Hafnor, some of the equipment is of a critical nature
and is nceded at once, citing exempleu such as two Mðrs light bars with
siren ùnd control heods which aro needed for tho Supervisor's and
DIreclor's cors, and one Motorola mobile radio with scannor.
County ^ttorney pickworth said thl1t he and the firm's attorney
have been fighting a -lotter war" over the issuo for Bome time and said
that, ev~n 1f a lawsuit was instigated, it 18 doubtful that the matter
could be resolved before the court in less than two woeks. H8 said
that Hr. Hafner hae advised hi~ that even two woeks is too long and,
therofore, it ",3. hie recommendation to Mr. Hafner that he find an
alternative solution and back-charge whatevor it coats to ~erican
AIIbulllnc8.
~OO;( OBl PACE 735
'890 54
:~
1t
... ..._._ _... ___.'__' ... .._...__..-_______....._~....__.._____...___.'"_.,ø.._.._..._.___..._....--.--.-..-'....
4
,
I,
.
I
I
I
!
ì
I ~
,I
¡
I
I
¡
I
f
I
..----------- -----------.-.---------.
~oo~ Got PAtE 136
Mðy 2&, 1981
County Manager Norman sU9gested that a declaratlon of emergency i.
not necessary, however, aince all of the items mentioned, individually,
will C08t over $2,000 Board authorization i8 necessary to .ffect the
budget amendments to follow.
Commissioner Wimer moved, .econded by Commls.loner Wenlel ond
unanimoualy carried, that the staff be authorized to purch... whatever
supplies and equipment are necessary to have "everything up to par-. ,
STATUS REPORT BY ST~rF ON STATUS OF TERMINATION OF AMBULANCE MANACEMENT
AGREEM!NTS WITH AMERIC~N A~BULANCE, INC.
County Manager Norman informed the Board that he, Fis~al Officer
fIllll ðnd County Attorney Pickworth have reviowod the status of the
Agree~ont to terminate the 1975 Ambulance Management Contract and the
Board action to terminate the 1980 Contract effective April 6, 1981.
In su~mðry, said Mr. Norman, the Exec~tive Summary dated May 22, 1981
lists all of the known i~sue8 to be addressed in each of the items.
With regard to tho 1975 Contract, Mr. Norman said that there ate two
m4~ters which are still not final in terms of the amounts involved -
one of which is Unreported Revenues which have been disclosed ln con-
junction with the invo8tigðtion work which is ongoing by the State'.
Attotney's office, and tho othor Is the claim submitted by American
Ambulance on ^pril 30, 1981 which is presently bein9 checked by the
auditor who perfor~ed the tormination audit.
Addressing the 1980 Contract, Mr. Norman said that final amounts
on the various items listed aD ðue to American Ambulance, Inc., aa well
as the amounts duo to Collier COUl\ty, have not been received as Yflt but
ahou14 be available tho following week. He said that the ·botto~ 11n.-
Is that, before all of the information is released to the Board for
Pa98 55
._----------------~--------.........---,-----
I . '
,
..
'CJ
1" ----;
-'
--
~ \
:\
"
,t·
"
:1
:;
~ ¡
'I
·1
I
¡
II
'I
II
11
:1
;1
:¡
.
í:
i'
i
I
'i
¡
¡\
'"
"
'.
"
'i
II
'I
Ii
'\
II
I ~
,I
:¡
II
ìi
('
;1
It
:t
!'
Ir'
..----- -- ---- - ------ ----- ----- -- ---
Ma y 2 G, 1 9 8 1
thoir d.ter~ination, it should be furnished to American ~bulanco for
thoir review and discussion as has been done on other mattera in tho
past.
Com~!øGioner Wimer inquired about the amount of ~oney being held
by tho County relative to the 1975 Contract. Following a brief dis-
cussion, Cl~rk W1lliam Reagan snid that $9,000 1s tho amount billod to
the County by the firm which has not beon paid and is tho only monftY
from the 1975 Cuntnct which doeD not involve another contract entered
into with Americ~lO. r~r. Uall pointed out that there is $58,000 1n caDh
collected under Revenues as part of the 1975 Contract termination which
Is the property of the County with Mr. Norman advising that tho only
portion of the $50,000 which American can lay claim to is the 10' col-
lection fee provided for in the Termination Agreement.
Pursllant to a dIscussion on whether or not the $20,000 held from
tho March payment undcr the 1980 Agreement would be sufficient, as was
questioned by Commissionor Wimer when the matter was discussed, Mr.
Hall said that it now appoars thðt there will be a difforence of $2,000
or $3,000 due to the fact that the collections were 108s than antici-
pated. Mr. Norman also pointed out that, si~ce that time, thore have
boen some significant changes - one being the fact that It wa' eKpectcd
that Mra. Mðguire would continue to reconcile and wipe out some of the
Category III items, as included in the Peat, Marwick, Hitchell , Co.
.udlt, which still remain at issue, and, also, it was eKpocted that the
County would receive $20,000 to $25,000 worth of equipment which has
not be.n pr.sented.
In response to Hr. Mike Zewalk's comment that the public is
confus.d over the matter, Commissioner Wenzel Baid that, when the
BOOK Oö1 PACE 737
rago 5';
l-----------~----~-~-----~-~-----
~ I
,--~---~-----~-~~----~----~---'---~
&OOX OBi PAtE 738
May 2&, 1991
Manager get. all of the fi9ure. together, they will be pre.ented to the
Doard and to the public, adding that all of the fðcta and figure. are
.till not sufficient to ~.ke . factual pre.ontation.
Clerk Reagan pointed out that a lot of hard work i. being done by
a lot of people but that one of the reasons that the .taff doe. not
have all of the figures ia bocauae they have not been given the.. He
.aid that there Is information which the County has not been able to
obtain, by law, and the Commissionera could be given figurea which
could change the next day. Mr. Reagan also commented on the $116,000
bill which haa been unexpectedly received, which must be pre-audited
and which will take Dome time. adding the further comment that the
Grand Jury has many of the records which he cannot obtain.
Mr. Zowalk voiced h1s concorn over providing a "blank check- to
the statf to purchaso duplicðtea of items which may be returned In the
future with Chairman pistor replying that he Is confident nothing will
be purchðsed that is not Immcdiðtely needed, adding that some of the
itORS mentioned can be unod on the new vehiclos when they arrive.
Mr. Norman said that hI! does not "iew the authorization given by the,
Board as ð "blank check" obecrving that some flexibility Is needed
because of the emergency nðturo of the operation. He emphasized that
there are no secrots bocause evcry action the Board takes is in the,
-sunshlno-, with "overy thing- ,audited ~nd reported on to the Board.
Mr. Hall said that of the approximately 19 "number.- that it would
take to put a report togethor, tho staff probably has good, hard
information on 5 or 6 of them - the balance would be annotated with
footnotes saying "It this hðppons- or "something else i8 being
reviewed- and the like. Going back to the otatement by Comml..lonar
PØ9 a 57
I
:¡
,¡
"
I
!
I
I
I
------~---,~--------------~----~-
, .
.'¡
f'" "',-,
,
---.;
:=1' .
t
,____------------------J----J-----......----- ....
May 26, 1991
Wimer that ho based a judgmental decision on staff assurances that a
certain sum would be adequato, ~r. Hall saið that the In!or~atlon at
that tI~e still "hol~s· but observed that other matterø,hav8 come to
light, the largest one being tho $116,000 billing which 18 new. lie
coøunonted that it 18 hi. opin ion that the staff 1s neerln9 tho .",ð on
gott1ng all of tho numbers together 80 that a report cen b8 brought to
the Board with good, meaningful figurcB.
Mr. Rea(jlan obsorved that nono of tho plIGt decisions which tho
Board has made are changcd in any way, however, there are new decisions
which have to be made, and thnt, as Boon as possible, a recommendation
will b. brought to tho Bo~rð.
Chair~ðn pintar concluded the discussion with the comment that,
hopefully, by the next meeting the entire matter will be "ironed out".
REC!SSa 12102 P.M. until 1130 P.M. at which time Doputy Clerk
Bronne~ðn was replaced by Deputy Clerk Davidson.
NOTEI Commissioner Wimer was not present when the meeting
vas reconvened.
CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES FOR (18) SUMMER RECREATION SUPERVISORS -
APPROVED FOR EXECUTION
Commiosioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Comissloner Brown snd
carried 4/0, with Commissioner Wimer absent, that the contracts for the
following eighteon summor recreation supervisors be approved for
execution by the Chairman, subject to tho availability of funds within
the Parka and Recreation budget.
Henry Norona
Robert Jackson
Carol Re imenn
Ed r..llinger
Jeo!lO Nðra
...1 ke Templeton
Wendy Ha inos
Romero Campins
Cheryl DiCiacomo
Beth Henry
Bornðdett Campanone
Tracoy Wentzel
Juan At-lI\ero
Kirtley Schu1thoIs
Wa ynÐ Di G1ðcomo
Judy Gte I.gerwald
Edna Reyna
Paul Coatos
BOOK Oö1 PACE 739
PII98 58
--- -=- ---:-- - - -- - --: -:-- - - - -:-r:- - -;- - -- - - ~ - - - -:--- .-,
~
.
.------- - -- -- - -- - -- -. - ~- - --- - -- -- - - -- - - .--- - --
BOOK 001 fACE 758
fotay 26, 1981
BID 1484 rOR TI1EODOLITE TR~NSIT (tNGINE£RINC DEP~RTMr.NT) . ~W~RDED TO
ALLEN PRECISION EQUIPMENT CO. OF ^TL^NT~, G~. IN THE AMOUNT or $2,490
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on May
~ And 7, 1981, as evidencod by ~ffidavit of publication filed with the
Clerk, bids were received up to Wodnesday, May 20, 1981 for aid 1484
for a Theodolite Transit.
Commissionor Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Xruse and
carried 3/1, with Commlsoloner Wenzel opposod &nd Commissioner Wimer
absent, that Bid 1484 for a Theodolite Transit for use by the .
Engineering Department be awarded to Allen Precision Equi~Qent Co.,
Atlanta, Goorgla in the amount of $2,490, 8S recommended by purchasing
Director Frank Wilcox and outlined within the Executive Summary dated
Hay 22, 1981, and that the Chairman be authorized to sign and the Clerk
to attest the rosulting ðgroement.
DID 1482 LEASE WITIJ PURCHA~E OPTION AND INSTÃLLATION OF ~N INFORM~TION
PROCESSINC SYSTf.M FOR BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT - ~W~RDED TO IBM
(MONTHL~ COST $2,1310) (TOT^L COST $130,8~O)
Legal notice hftving beon published In the Naples Daily News on
April 28 and 30, 1981, as evidenced by ~ffidðvit of publication filed
with the Clerk, bids were received up to May 20, 19B1 re Bid 1482 for a
lease with purchase option ~nd installation of an information
processing system for tho Building Inspoction Department.
. . .
Commissioner Wimer entered the meeting at this ~1~4& 1&38 P.M.
. . .
purchasing Director Frank Wilcox exploined that, In addition to
the quoted prices, thero were other aspects taken into consideration by
Dr. Ruth Thomas, Word procosslng Consultant, Torry Virtð, Community
Development Administrator, and Mr. Wayne Scamehorn, Building Director,
who jointly reviowod all bids roceived. He reported that their joint
----------------------------~g~~--
. .
,
CJ
¡--¡
-
~....----:
--'
\
I
!
¡
\
j
\
II
II
!
;
I
. ;
, -- - -'- - - '"'-- - - -- - -- _.-:. - - - - - - - - - - - -- - --"
MI'lY 26, 1981
recommendation is to award the subject bid to IBM.
Co~mlaøion8r Wimer movod, soconded by Commissloner Wenzel and
carriod unanimously, that Bid 1482 for the leone purchase option and
Instelletion of an in!ormðtlon procesßinq system for the Building
Inspoction Department bo awðrded to IBM in the totnl ðmount of $130,860
at a ~onthly cost of $2,181, aB recommended within the Exocutive
Summary dated 5/22/81, and that the Chairman be authorized to sign and
tho Clerk to attest tho rosulting Agreement.
BID '483 FOR ST~ND ^LONE CONFIGUR~TtONS RE INFOnM^TION PROCES9INC FOR
BUILOING INSPECTION DEP^RTMENT - AWARDED TO IBM ON ^N "OPEN-END"
CONTRACT IN THE ^HOUNT OF $6,054 PER UNIT ANNUALLY OR $504 MONTHLY
Logal notice having been publiDhcd in the Nnples Dally News on
~pril 28 and 30, 19B1, 08 eyidenced by Affidavit of publication filed
with the Clerk, bids wore receivcd up to Mðy 20, 1981 re Bid 1483 for
stand ^lone configurations re information procensing for the Building
Inspection Department.
purchasing Director Frank Wilcox explained the "open-end" contract
which is pursuant to IMB'n submittal of Bid 1483 for the stand alono
configurations that complement the information proc08sin9 systom for
which IBM aubmitted Bid 1482. Ho also stated that the subject contract
doe. not commit tho County to purchase said equipment, rather, the
configuratlono will be available to tho County at the quoted prices on
an _a. needed basis·. County Manager Norman concurred, adding that any
purcha... under this contact would have to be authorized by the BCC.
Hr. Wilcox said that it 1s the joint recommend~tion of Dr. Thomas, Word
proco..ing Consultant, Torry v1rta, community Development Adminiatra-
tor, and Wayne Scamohorn, Buildin9 Director that Bid '483 be awarded to
IBM.
Commiasioner Wimer moved, soconded b~commiD81on.r Wenzel and
~OOK Oö1 PACE {59
.---------------------------------..
\
~
--,-'"
. .
____________________~______~uw--
~QQK OBi PACE 760
May 2~, 1981
carried unanimously, that Bid 1483 for stand alone information
processing configurations be awarded to IBM in the annual amount of
$6,054 per unit or ð ~onthly cost of $504, a. recommenðed within the
Executive Summary dated 5/22/81, and that the Chairman be authorized to
sign and the Clerk to attest the resulting agreement.
COUNTY M1\N1\GER AUTHORIZED TO AT'1'tMPT SUBSTITUTION OF VEHICLES IN ORDER
TO PROVIDE Er.S Drnr.CTOR A VEI1ICLE
County Manager Norman explained that the Executive Summary dated
5/22/81 outlines a proposal for substitution of vohicles in order to
provide a suitable vehicle for use by the EMS Director. Ho said that
this proposal is no longer valid, DS the intended station wagon i8 too
old and has too many miles on the odometer to make the tra,,:,fer. Ite
said that he does, howover, have another source of a .uitable vehicle
in mind and he requested authorization to completo the substitution if
possible. He explained that in the event that such a substitution Is
not posbiblo, then, the original purchase of a station wagon for the
EMS Director, as approved by the DCC on 5/19/81, will be initiated.
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzol and
carried unanimously, that Mr. Norman's recommendation be accepted, that
he be given authorization to attempt the aforcmentioned substitution of
vehicles, and, in ~he event that the substitution is not possible, the
5/19/61 action stands.
EXPENDITURE FOR FUNDS NOT TO EXCEED $5,000 FOR RESURF1\CING EVERGLADES
CITY TENNIS COURTS AUTHORIZED, FISC1\L OFFICER TO PREP1\RE RELEVANT
BUDGET AMENDMENT
Parke and Recreation Diroctor Rollie Rice stated that he haa
receivoda request from the Mayor ðnd the citizens of tver9lðdeo City
to tund the resurfacing of that City's tennis courts. He explained
P1I90 n
----------------------------------
. .
- ]
~
::=J
X'.
___ 1..--._ - -"- - -- - -- - - -'- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - _..
May 26, 1981
that the deterioration ot the 8urCaco,ot the courts occur. about every
five year. and that the County has contributed towards the resurfacing
In tho pa.t. It was noted in the Exocutive Sumamry, datod 5/22/81 and
prepared by Mr. Rico, that the tonnis courtÐ in Evorglad~s City servos
the outlying areas ot Everglades City such ðS plantation, Chokoloskoe,
Lee Cypre.s, and Ochopee and i8 also used 'for tonnis classos.
A discussion followed regardlng tho methods of funding such a
project, the sourCQS of lunds available for this project as well as
those used for prior resurfacing, and, methods of allocating the costs
of reourfacing, 1.e. sharing tho expense with Everglades City versus
the County bearing the entirø financial burden and/or the ramifications
of each. County Manager Norman explain(d thût the tennis courts can be
considered as one of those facilities that bonefit tho entire County as
decided during the recent "double taxation issuo", therefore, the
resurfacing could be funded through tho Genoral Fund in tho Dame manner
as the resurfacing of tho tonnis courts in other park8 within incor-
porat.ed aroas, i.o. Naples High School.
A discussion followed rognrding t.he probloms related to supplying
services t.o incorporated areas at the conclusion of which Fiscal
Officer Harold L. Hall stated that he would work with tho County
Att.orney and the County Manager beforo preparing the relevant budget
a~endment in an effort to reach an equitable decision a8 to tho source
of funds"for the ,ftubject projoct.
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and
carried unanimously, that the expenditure of funds not to oxcood $5,000
for the resurfacing of the tverglades City tennis courts bd ðuthorize~
.nd that the Fiscal Officer pr.pare the relevant budget amendment for
presontation to the Board.
"
~OOK 001 PACE 761
.
1!
... ...... - ...--. - -- ---
--------------------
~:
.~
.'
i
~
! ¡
! I
¡ . ~_______________-_._._-----------p.~,r.;¡r--'·'
¡
,
t
I
¡
¡
I
¡
J
&OOK OBi PACë 762
"'ay 26, 1981
POGITION OF ,.,ANAGER OF COMrUTER OPER^TIONS IN DATA PROCESSING APPROVED
AT PAY GRADE 14, UPGRADING OF (7) POSITIONS' PAY GRADES AUTIIORI%ED,
$19,500 AUTHORIZED POR Rt-At.LOCATION NITHIU S""'E DEP^RTfoIENT BUDGET
Data proce.sing DIrector Bill Denty referrod to the proposal for
the creation of the position of Manager of Computer Oporation. at a pey
irad. 14 and the upgrading of ..ven other positions within the Date
proce.sing Department outl·ined within the Executive Summary dated fl\ðy
20, 1981, as wall as a request for approval of the .um of $19,500 to be
re-allocated from Roserve for Wage and Salary Adjustment to Salary and
Fringe Benefits within that department's budget. The following are the
recommended changes in the subject department's organizations
positions
Current Pay Grade
Requested Pay Grade
No Chang-
No Chang-
23
2J
23
16
23
23
10
No chang' proposed
14
Director
project Analyst (CJIS MGR.)
project Anal yst
project Anlllyst
Tech. Support Analyst
Programmer Analyst
programmer·
programmer*
Computer Operator
Secretary
M9r. Computer Operations··
27
27
18
18
18
12
9
9
7
* Recommended for upgrading to project ^nalyst at pay grade 23.
** Recommended for creation of position.
"
After a brIef discussion and upon Mr. Denty's statement that the
Data processing Policy Committee has reco~endnd tho approval of the
above-referenced changos in tho organizational structure of his
department, Commissioner Wimer movod, seconded by Commissioner Brown
and carried 4/1, with Commissioner Kruse opposed, that the pos1ton of
¡. mðnager of computer operations be approvod at a pay gr~de 14, that the
I. above-roferenced (7) positions be upgraded accordinglYI and, that the
aum of $19,500 be approved for re-allocation withIn the Data procoss1ng
budget.
J
,.'T--~- - - --,~'-- - -- ----- -:--- _._______pag!-.tS1----
. , . .
, .
. .
. .
, i
,,..--,
¡--¡
~
-
--------------------------------..
May 26, 1981
810 PROCEUS W^IVED, r.XPENDITURE OF $10,000 FOR CONSTULT^NT SERVICES OF
ENGINEER LEON MURH1\Y RE STUDY OF PO\'IER PRODLEMS RELATED TO DAT^
PROCESSING OPER1\TIONS - APPROVED
Commissioner pistor asked Data procesoing Director aill Donty to
relata the various problems associ~ted with tho electrical power supply
to the Data Processing SYGtem and to make his rocommendations to the
Board. Commissioner Wenzel asked Mr. Denty if thero was a consultant
hired last year to study the electrical problems of the Data Procossing
System and Mr. Denty said that Digital Equipment Co. has comploted a
aurvoy which was subsoquently turned over to the Policy Co~mittee. Ho
said that Dl~ltal'a survey identified tho problems related to the
operations of D8ta Processing and offercd four alternate solutions,
however, tho problems have not been rem"died. He said that he has
contacted Fl~rida power & Light Company who gnve him tho namft of two
Electrical Engineers who could handlo the problems. He said that one
engineer expressed no intereot in tho project and the other, Mr. Leon
Murray, has visited tho Complex and indicated that he considers there
are several alternative solutions which might be undertaken, as out-
lined in the letter submitted to the Data processing Policy Committee.
Mr. Denty atated that it will require a qualified electrical engineer
to mako a final determination as to what tho power related nceds ðre
for Collier County. lie said that because he believos that there io a
n.ed to remedy these power related problems as soon as possible and
because of the time element involved in a formal bid process, he i.
requesting that the bid procoss be waived.
Mr. Denty outlined tho high costa involved in damage suffered from
power surges to tho data processing equipment and tho subsequent high
coat of repair and/or replacement such a8 the $40,000 1060 in revenuos
and equipment damago resulting trom such a powor ðurge on July 4, and
Auguøt 30, 1979.
WOK Oöl fACE 763
. ....-....------ ---- ---------------------
,
. .
.__----------~--------------~r~--
bOOK Oö1 PAGE 764:
May 26, 1981
A discus.ion followed regarding the placement of the lightning
rods on the root of the complex 1n relation to placement of antnnnae,
the problema related to a flve-story building such aa Building ·f·,
which is the highest building in the immediate area, and the relation-
ship of bullding height to the attraction of lightningl the fact that
the manufacturer of the equipment has identified the problema and that
the solutions require the professional judgement of eloctrical
.ngineers, aa explained by Clerk Reagan who reminded the Board that the
problems are vary complox because the power source Bupplie. many
..parate buildings here at the government center, and the proposed
contract costs with Mr. Murray as outlined by Mr. Denty. ~r. Canty
explained that the $10,000 Is the minimum fee for which Mr. ~urray will
agr.. to study the complex, decide on an appropriato solution, and
writ. the specifications for what is requ~rod to solve the problem.
Commissioner Kruse Asked for clarification regarding tho proposod fee
and Mr. Centy explained that this is a consultant's foe.
Commissioner pistor outllnQd some of tho alternative solutions to
the subject power problems, including the installation of · "gen-
erator/olternator system" which would run all of the time and would
cost approximately $135,000 to install plus the cost of operation.
Also, tho alternative of installing a second power line, which would
have to b~ connected to a second source and could not be connocted to
the source presently used by the Complex. In answer to Commissioner
Kruse, Clerk Reagan said that other counties are experiencing many of
the samo problems ðnd are installing various alternatives such as a
conøtant 80urce of power and Mr. Denty concurred, adding that each
county has its own unique problema. He outlined some problems unique
to Collier County including tho presence of grounding grids which run
through tho roof of Building "F· and havo power lines running diroctly
------------------------------.----
.
. .
:=J
¡--1
,'--
--'
I
¡
f
j
I
I
¡
,
,
,
___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ - - - - ---- - - ---vlr9i-1fS- -,'
t'lay 2G, 1981
beneath them. He explained what will happon if R~ilding MF- were to
experience a direct "hit- from lightning and Commisnioner Wenzol stated
that an electrical engineer should be able to find a way to direct'that
-hit" away from the buIlding. Also discuss~d was tho fact that b..idos
problema relatod to surgos, the Data processing syatem a100 auffora
from minor intorruptions in powor. lie said that thQse interruptions
cause tho systom to suddenly "drop" and it takes 30 minutes to 1 hour
to get all UBors "back on tho air- resulting in -totally unproductivo
timo- spent by tho Data processing Department as well as tho various
'user 8.
Mr. Denty said that h~ talked with Bill Scott, of the Department
of Energy in Atlanta, Goorgia and that he recommended an -altornate
source" which is callcd a -spot network-. Mr. Denty said that Mr.
Scott informed him that the powcr company is obligðtcd to supply the
County with this kind of service ~f it is dotermined as a requirement
for proper oporation of the data processing systcm. In answer to
Commissioner Wenzel, Me Denty said that Mr. Scott indicated that, in
order to pursue this course of action, tho BCC would havo to iaBue a
formal complaint to FP&L and thon, if satisfactory results are not
forthcoming, the BCC would have to follow through with 'a complaint
filed with the Public Service Commission. Mr. Donty said that all of
the solutions mentioned during the discussion are viable alternativea,
howevor, he believes that the Board needs the profensional guidance of
a competent eloctrical engineer to guide them in these decisions and to
recommend the best steps to take. He Baið that he do.s not fool that
he has the qualifications to make these kinds ot a recommendations to
the Board and recommended that the Board approve the consultant
contract with Mr. Murrray.
After a brief discussion r09~~)p9 t~6~8tory of tho subject
aOOK UDJ. PACE'{ ,t)
---:--- --:------,--.-------:--¡--------- --- -.--
~
------.---------'------
----ncë"---
&OO~' Oöl PACE 766
May 26, 1981
department and those ~atter. rolated to financing the anticipateð kind.
ot solution. requirod to regulate the electric power, Commiosioner
Wen~el moved to transmit a letter of complaint to' FP&L as recommended
by Mr. scott and, if there is no satisfaction, th~ Board will issuo a
complaint to the PSC. The motion died for lack ot a second.
The discu~sion continued rogarding the adequacy of the po~er
supply into the Complex, during which Mr. Centy stated that he
considers it "less than adequato· becausc the system has ·gona down-
three times in tho last week due to power fluctuations. Also discussed
further was tho proposed consultant'. fee of $10,000 which repr.sent.
approximately 10\ of what is anticipated as the probable cost of the
installation ot a "UPS. (Uninterruptable power Source). Mr. conty said
that a .UPS" consistD ot batteries and he added that this alternative
mAY not be "cost justified". Mr. Norman said that he believes that if
tho costs would be very high for the power company to run an oxtra
service lino into the Complex and, if the Board is anticipating forcing
the power company to install suc~ a system, it would be prudent for tho
County to have "expert information" available to "back up" such a
request as well AS to present to the PSC. Mr. Ccnty concurred, adding
th~t whichever alternative the Board decides to initi~te, they will
need an "expert opinion" for justification.
Commissioner wenzel ßoid that he soes no alternative but to
øpprove thu proposed contract~ ospecially sinco Mr. Centy has not been
able to got ~nyonc else interested in doing the work and because of tho
~pparent criticøl situation regarding the powor problems affecting tho
D~tø processing System. Commissioner pistor said that ho has read all
the minuten of the Policy Committee and he knows that the question a.
to how to solve the electric power problems has been going on for oyor
a year and requires the immediðtQ attention of the board. He 8aid that
. - --- - - - - -..- ---: - - - - --- - - - - ---- --,....----
"--1
-
r--~
-1
________.__ __._______________-mer:;-r---'
May 26, 1981
he feels that it has bun delayod long enough. Clerk Reagan u,id, that.
the high cost involved in 8olvin9 the problem has dQterred action in
the past and Mr. Denty said that the longer the County wait. the ~or.
it i. going to cost in repairs, equipment, and tho 10.. of valuable
e~ployee productivity time. Commissioner Wenzel moved, .econded by
Com~i.810ner Wimor and carried 4/1, with Co~mi8sionor Kruso opposed,
that the bid process bo waived and that the contract for Engineering
Consultant Services of Leon Murray in the amount of $10,000 bo
authorized, as recommended by Data Processing Director Bill Denty.
800lt Oô1 fAte 767
---------------_._----------_!~~~-~!._. .:.
.;
~
,.
. ___- ___ - -...__ ____ ---.-II --------------------.. ---
&OOK 061 PACE 768
May 2&, 1981
RESOLUTION 81-147 LE~SING COUNTY PROPERTY KNOWN ~S C"^" PROPERTY TO-THE
COLLIER MODEL ~ERON~UTIC9 CLUB, INC. - hDOPTED. LE~SE ~PPROVED FOR
EXECUTION
Upon hearing that tho proposed leaeo with the Collier ~odol
~.ronautlc. Club, Inc., for County proporty known aa the Cran property,
includes the usuðl provisions for liability Insurance covera~e, troN
I
I
I
I
I
i
\
I
¡
.
County ~ttorney Pickworth who added that the adoption of a Resolution
declaring the subject property not needed for County purpose. i. In
order, Commissioner Wimer ~oved, seconded by Co~m18.ion.r Brown and
carr1ed unanimously, that Resolution 81-147 declaring the Gran property
not needed for County usa and authoriz1ng the leae1ng of same property
to the Collier Modol Aeronautics Club, Inc. be adopted and that the
lease bo approved for execution.
,.
_--------------------------~n9~~--
I .
, '
, .
C3
'.
r:-"'~~'1
r:::J '
--------------------------------
May 26, 1901
P"RT-TIME SECRETARI"L POSITION FOR COUNTY ATTORNEY AUTHORIZED
County ^ttorney Donald Pickworth explainod that one secretary,
cannot handle all the work entailed in a three-attorney offico, there-
fore, he is requcsting authorization to hire a part-time .ecretary to
co~plement his staff. lie sa lC1 that he is proposing to hiro ð l/2-time
person at the minimum wago for this job, adding that ho has contacteCl
8omeone who can work for Boven weeks this Bummer. He Bald that th\a
will give him the opportunity to BOO how a pnrt-time secretarial posi-
tion will work out in his office before making any permanent decisions.
Com~ißsionor Wimer moved, soconded by Commissioner Brown anCl
cArried unanimously, that tho pooition of a part-timó secretary be
approved for t~e County Attornoy's Office, and that Mr. pickworth be
authorized to fill the position.
WARRANTY DEED Rt PETITION TDR-8l-2C, COLLIER DEVELOPMENT CORPOR^TION -
"CCEPTED, SUBJECT TO CERT^IN LANGUAGF: CIIANGES RECOMMENDED BY COUNTY
"TTORNEY REGARDING PnollIßITION OF UGE OF SUßJECT PROPERTY FOR SECURING
OIL/MINERAL RIGHTS RETAINED BY COLLIER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
RESOLUTION Al-I~8 RE DOARD ^CCEPT^NCE OF SA~'E WARRANTY DEED - ADOPTED
. I
,
County "ttorney Pickworth roported that Collier Development
Corporation has delivered the Warranty Deod for the property regarding
Petition TDR-8l-2C, and that he i8 recommending the acceptance of said
De.CI, subject to certain languago changcs regarding tho prohibition of
the u.e of the subjoct lend by Colllor Corp. to secure any 011 or
.1netals subsequent to tho Collier Corp. IS retentlon of the oil/mlneral
rights. In answer to Commissioner Kruse, Mr. Pickworth said that this
retention of oil/mineral rights is commonplace In real estate trans-
actlona, however, without tho spocific language changes he Is rocom-
mending, the party holding those rights could use tho property to get
to tho oil or ~in8ral8. Ho sald that he Is recommenCling that the
Corporation b. specifically prohibited from doing 80 and that, if they
~OOK 061 ¡fACt Tm
-_...._-_._-----,,---------_._--_.__....-._._...._......~...-.. ...~..... ....,.., ....-.
-
-.
\
~
.~---~-~--~--~--~~--~~~~--~-
nqr7T1--
~o~ 001 PA~ 780
May 26, 1981
wl.h to .ecure any oil or minerals, they would have to -slant drill-
trom adjac.nt property. AIBO discu..ed briefly was the reason for the
County'. acc~ptanc. of the land, same being the pre.ervation of that
land. Mr. pickworth ro.ponded to CommloBloner ~ruse'. query stating
that, to his knowledge, this is the first time that a petitioner has
requested to retain the oil/mineral rights for property re the TDR
process, however, he soes no roason not to approve the retontion of
.uch rights, aa long as the aforementioned stipulations are Included In
the relevant docUmontatlon.
Comminsloner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner wimer, that the
warranty Deed from Collier Development Corporation ro Petition
TDR-8l-2C be acceptod, subject to the aforementioned languag8 changes
as outlined by Mr pickworth. planner ,Lee Layne said that the Planning
Department has a standard resolution rogarding the acceptance of the
subject Deed that will require adoption as well, and both tho motioner
and the soconder Agreed to include the adoption of Resolution 81-148 in
the motion. The motion carried ,unanimously.
"
¡
j
¡
,
¡ .~- - ---...,.. - -- - r;- - - - ____- - ---- - --P..!....'!!.._-
, \
I
\
. ,
. ,
r=J
~."
. ~
r:
-
· . .
, ------- '--- --------- ----------------
'..
~o~ OUl fAŒ 785
MAy 215, 1981
COUNTY ATTORNEY l\UT\tOnIZED TO HIRE ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
County l\ttorney pickworth 8t~ted that Assistant County AttorneY
Anthony pires i8 leaving his position and he roquestod authorization to
hire another attorney to fill that vacancy. The rate ot pay for the
replacement attorney was discussed briefly, during which Mr. pickworth
said that he would probably have to hiro tho now attorney at the sa..
rate of pay 4S is currently being given Mr. piras, or perhaps a8 much
as $3,000 more annually, in order to hire someone who is qualif1ed to
take over the rooponsibilities of that poal tion. County Manger Norman
sald that the current personnel policy allows for h1r ing new personnel,
at up to 10' more than the current rate and Mr. pickworth said, that
this may not be Buff ic ient 1n order to get an attorney to move into the
area and take the position. After a discussion of the kind of
exporience that he is looking for in the applicants for the posit10n,
the responsibilities of that position, and the føct that there has to
be an incontive for anyone tðking the position to rolocate in Collier
county, Commissioner Wimer moved, secondod by Commissioner Brown and
carried unanimously, that the County Attorney be authorized to
negotiate the salary and hire an Assistant County Attorney.
ROUTINE BILLS - APpnOVED FOR PAYMENT
Commisßioner Wenzol moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
carried unÐnimously, that tho routino billo, having been processed
following eotablishcd proceduro with funds available, be approved for
pðyment 4S evidenced by the following checks issued from May 20, 1901,
through Mðy 26, 19811
ACCOUNT
BCC PAYROLL (D.P.WRITER)
COUNTY CHECKS
MYROLL FUND
cnECK NUMBERS
23617 - 24144
,8512 8715
1
pag_ 12
,...------.-----;~------------------~--'
, .
c=J
c:::J
c=J'
..
\
I .
L___________________---~---~-----~
Ma y 2 6 , 1 9 81
BUDGET hMENDMENT NO. 01-105 APPROPRI^TINO CONTRIBUTIONS ^S ^ßSIST^NCE
IN fURCnASINO AAILROAD RIr.lIT-OF-W^'l (5th , Gth CENT G.l.S T.l.X FUND) -
~DOfTED IN TltE .I.",OUNT OF $340,000
Com~lssioner Wimer moved, socondod by Commissionor Brown and
carr led unanimously, that nUdget Amend~.nt No. 81-105, appropriating
contrlbutions aa assiatðnce in purchasing the railroad right-of-way
fro~ pine Ridge Road to Immokalee Road from Seaboard Coast Line
Railroad Company and to transfer funds from Reservo for Future
Expenditures to Land, bo adopted in tho amount of $340,000.
\,
6D:)K Oô1 I'm 787
\
, ' fag 0 73
I----:---~------:-----~--.-------------
!
1
~
,
I
.
.;
,
\.
'"
, . I
~-------------------------------~
May 26, 1981
BUDO£T AMENDMENT NO. 81-106 TR1IN'SFERRING FUI~DS TO PROVIDE Fon NEW
8ECRE1'ARIAL POSITION WITHIN BCC BUDGET - ADOPTED IN TilE ^MOUNT OF
!~,080 ---
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commlsalonor'arown and
carried unanimously, that Budget ~enðment No. 81-106, transferring
funds to provide tor now secretarial poøition within the BCe Budget, be
aðopted in the amount of $5,080.
õßIìt)j( Ofil acE 789
Page 7(
~-:---......---------- - - ---:-------------=-----
.
"
v
,
,
.
, ~
'\
..
"
{
.~
, .
_____...1.-------------=-------------------
May 26, 1981
BUDGET ~!NDMENT NO. 81-107 TRANSFERRING FUNDS TO PROVIDE FOR COST OF
COLORIMETER WJTHIN ^GRICULTURE BUDOF.T - 1\DOrTED IN THP: AMOUUT or $975
Commi.sioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commis8ioner Wenzol and
carried unanimously, thðt Budget A.n\endlllent No. 81,-107, uanaferr1n9
funds to provide for the cost of a Colorimetor within tho ^griculture
Departmont's Budget, bo adopted in the amount of $875.
,
J
,>f,
tutlK Ot;í aCE 791'
--------~---_..._--_............- .-...
Page 75
... ............ ...-....~.-.._._---_.....
,;
~
- -,~-
I
. ;
-------------------------------------
""ay 26, 1981
BUDCET AMENDMENT NO. 81-108 TRANSFERRING FUNDS TO PROVIDE FOR CONTINUED
PRE-EMPLOYMENT ACTIVITIES WITHIN PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT BUDCET - ADOPTED
IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,500
Co~mi.øloner Wimer moved, seconded by CommIssioner Wenzel and
carried unanimously, that Budget Amendmont No. 81-10B, transforrIng
funds to provIde for continued pre-employment actIvIties wIthIn the
Personnel DepDrtment Budget, bo adopted In tho amount of $4,500.
BOOK 001 PACE 793
.
. Page 76
____ ___ ___ _______ - _,_ ______ ___ --..t______ -.- --.
.
,
-----------~--------------------'
May 26, 1981
RESOLUTION NO 81-149 COMMENDING ~CTING AGRICULTURAL DIRECTOR p^UL JI~MM
AND nECOMI'1ENDING TII~T Ur. ElF. ~PPOINTr.D AS DIRECTOR - ADOPTED
A!tor a discussion regarding the apparent unwillin9nesa of the
University of Florida to appo1nt Acting D1rector paul Hamm as the
'Director of ^grlculturo for Collier County, the var10us reasons that
they have given for this lack of affirmative action, the fact that the
farmers 1n Immokaleo support Mr. Hamm wholeheartedly, and the consensus
0' the Board that they would like to aee Mr. Hamm get tho appointment,
Commissionor Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried
unanimously, that Resolution No. 81-149 commending Mr. Hamm for the
fine 'ob he has don~ and urging the Unlveroity to appoint him as
Director of Agriculture be adopted.
NOTE. Document not received by the Clerk's Office.
RESOLUTION NO. 81-150 RE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' POLICY ON
PAYMENT OF ROUTINE BILLS - ADOPTED
I.
Fiscal officer Harold Hall outlined a propooed rosolution which
authorizes the Clerk's Office to pay routine bills in an orderly and
timely fashion upon each bill meeting cortain roquirements for payment.
He explained that this process will negate tho need to have routine
bills come before the ace for approvol each week and will also allow
the Clerk's Office to process the routine billa in such a manner a8 to
avoid high work peak poriods each week. Mr. Hall explained that the
Clerk'. Office will make regular reports of ðll bills paid 1n this
..nner on woekly basis and that thiø report will becomo part of the
Minute. of oach Regular Bee meeting.
Mr. Hall outlinod the following ,requirementa for payment.
1. The expenditure was properly authorized.
~tJtw. OBi ~tt ~
pag8 77
. . -- -.-- -- - -- .-- -- - -- - - - - - - -....- - - - - - - - - - - - ---: - ---
-
,
_.- -- ---, '.., - ----------------------
i!ø 001 mE 196 May 26, 1981
2. The goods ot .etvl~e. were received satisfactorily.
3. An invoice or teque.t for payment was recoived and
determined to be correct.
. Upon hearing County ~ttornoy pickworth state that he has .tu6ieð
the proposed resolution and that he concurs with the content. thereof,
, '
Commi.sioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried
unanimously, that R..olutlon No. 81-150, regarding tho Board'. polley
on the payment of routine bll1s, be adopted.
..
page 78
T-------~-------~-~-~----~--~----
. '.' '
",
, .
'CJ
r\:.?~1
r:::::J' .
I
. . I
--------------------~---------~--l
~y 26, 1981
;6t~ 0B1 ¡rAtE 798
.
. .
.
Commissionor ~ru.o left the room at this time, 2123 P.M.
.
.
.
Dß. WILLIAM COX APPOINTED AS PROVIDER REPRESENTATIVE ON HEALTH SYSTEMS
COUNCIL
Commi..ionor pistor explained the need to choo.e a provider
represcntative to serve on the Health system~ Council in order to fill
the vacancy due to Mr. M~guiro no longor being a member. He Baid that
he has received rosumes from the following interested personsl Dr.
Wil~iam Cox, Dr. William Bailey, and, Robert Sandburg, tho Executive
Diroctor of Able Care.
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and
carried 4/0, with Commissioner Kruse out of the room, that Dr. William
Cox be appointed to serve as the Provider Ropresentative on tho Health
8YII tems Co unc i1 .
Commissioner Wimer requested that letters of appreciation be sent
to Dr. Bailey and Mr. Sandburg thanking them for their interest.
BCC VACATION EXTENDED TO JULY 14, 1981
Commisaioner Brown moved that the BCC vacation period be extended
to July 14, 19B1. Commissioner Wimer seconded the motion which carried
4/0, with Commissioner Krußo out of the room.
CERTIFICATES OF CORRECTION TO THE TAX ROLLS - AUTHORIZED FOR TilE
CH^IRM^N'S EXECUTION
Commissioner Wenzel movod, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and
carried 4/0, wtih Commlso1oner ~ruse out of the room, that tho
pag e 79
T----~-----~-~------------------~l
¡¡
. : i
1
r-"-_._~'"
,
~,"".'
~
~
-.-..,;,¡
-----
I
\
\
I
¡
j
\
--------------------------------.
May 26, 1981
following Certlflcatos of Correction to the 1980 Tax Rolls, havlng boon
pre.ented by the property Apprðlaer'8 Offico, be authorlzod for the
Chalr~an'8 execution.
1980 TAX ROLLS
TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY
NUMBERS
~
Hðy 18, 1981
1980 - 125 , 126
.
2129 P.M.
.
.
*
Commlssloner Kruseentored the room at thls timec
*
*
EXTRA G"'IN TIME FOR INPf....TE f^ 3<1056 - AUTHORIZED
Commlssloner Wenzol movcd, soconded by Commlssioner Wimer and
carrled unanimously, that 25 days extra gain time bo approvod for
Inmate No. fA 34056, as recommended by Shorlff Aubrey Rogers.
LEASE AGREEMENT RE MARCO ISLAND FIRE DISTRICT FOR EMS SP....CE, RETRO-
....CTIVE TO ....PRIL 6, 1981 - ^UT"ORIZ~O FOR CHAXRHAN'S ~IGNATURe
....dministrative Aide Grace Spaulding reported thðt she has received
a request from the ~rco Island Fire Department for a Board decision
regarding the execution of the le..e for .~ace at the fire station for
u.. by the County EMS. She said that the proposed lease ls for $125.00
per month plus utllities, retroactive to April 6, 1981.
There was a brief discussion rcgardin9 the cost of space at the
,
various EMS stations, during whlch Hr. Itafner, Public Safoty
Ad~ln18trator, reported the followlng rent expansesl
i. Colden Cðto Fire Department - $100.00 per month
2. Headquarters- $550.00 por'month
Page 80
i6ÓOK W IVA"nE 100
---..."..---------------:-------------:....--- '
~
,
=
-~,~..",'-
~
,_~___-------- .a..-_.-..:-----....:...-----:..--'---"---
~Q~'i.
061 Flott: 800
May 26, 1981
3. Marco IBland rlre Department - $125.00 per ~onth
4. Immoka1ee rlre Statlon - $150.00 per month
5. North Naples - $300.00 per month
Commle.loner Wl~er moved, seconded by Comml..loner Brown anð
carried unanimously, that the lease for EMS apace at the Marco Islanð
I Flre Department be authorized for the Chairman'. slgnatura, a. outlined
! earlier by Ma. spaulding.
I
t
.
I
,
I
!
I
I
I
I
..
,
,~
>/.,
'"
pag e 81
~-----~----~---------------------
. '
. .
, ¡.,;¡: H
',,' .
.
~.>'..
~
~.
~
---
-------------------------------- .,
Hay 26, 1981
BCC FISC^L POLICY TO INCLUDE F.GTABLISlIMENT OF POLICY RC CONTR^CTU^L
SERVICES, B01\RD ADOPTED rOLICY ST1\TEfo\F:NT M; RECOMMENDED BY TilE CLERK.
FORM (SCIIEDULE 9) RE ACTIVITIES PROPOSED FOR CONTRACTU^L SERVICES TO BE
^DDr.O TO 1981-82 BUDGET I-IORK£IIF.ET FOR DF.PARTM£NT IIEAD'S cot-1rLETION'
Co~i.aioner Kruso stated that sho would like the Board to
consider the Implementation of contr~ctual sorvice. within the Data
Proco..lng Department rather than maintaining the numbers of personnel
presently requlrod as approved this morning. Chairman pistor said
thai, because all of the Constitutional Officors require work completed
at various timos, tho Data Processing personnel must be available at
-I
all time to do that work.
In answer to CommissIoner Kruse, Fiscal Officer narold Hall
explained that it would be possible for the County to descrlbo the
overall system that Is wanted, and then, contract it outl Commissioner
r.ruøe said that in that manner the County oporators could· then run thø
program. Mr. Hall concur rod, adding that there would also be a need
for one computer programmer for maintenance. CommissIoner Kruse said
that sho would like this to be considered, especially in lig~t of the
large sum of money that must be allocated for salarIes In the subject
'j
dep~rtment.
Hr. Hall roferred to tho Executive Summary submitted by County
Manager Norman dated May 2~, 1981, and stated that this report
addresses most of these points and identifics somo areas that have
already been the subject of the initiation of. contractual services.
In response to CommissIoner Wimer, Mr. lIall recommended that a
form (Schedule 9) be attached to the budget worksheet for FY 1981-82,
for completion by Dopart~ant heads, regarding actIvities ,that may be
performed by commercial firms on a contractual basis. ^t Commis-
.toner Wimer's request, Mr. nall ðistributod copies of a lIIemorandum,
WQ1; 061 fAt£ 803
Page 82
--~--------------~-----------------~~
~
,
. . .
___-----------l-----------~-----
May 26, 1981
~OK 061 PA~E 804
dated Hay 23, 1981 which included a copy of the subject form, to the
Coœmis.ionerø and he Baid that, if the.e forma are properly completed
by the department heads, .11 the information that Commissioner ~rUBe ia
referring to will be forthcoming.
Mr. Hall recommended that the Board reinstate the'followl~
atatement in the Fiscal Policy.
-The Board dosires to utilize the services of commercial
firms to the extent practicablo in the obtaining of
services for governmontal units and in 8upplyln~
governmental services to the people of Collier Couney.
Further, tho Doard does not desire to increase the size
of county government, therefore, the heads of budgetary
units which are budgeted all or in part by the Board of
County Commissioners, each year prior to submission of
budget requosts, are to evaluate each activity for which
they orc responsiblo and report to the Board of County
Commissionors the result of their evaluation and
comments regarding the use of outside purchasod
oorvices.-
Mr. Hall sald that there ore many advantages as well .a
disadvantagos to the use of outside contractual services, as outlined
vithin Mr. Norman's EXÐcutive Su.,mary. 1\lso, Mr. Itall stated that
-government by contract- 1s a g~od concept and allowS the government to
spotlight some high cost areas. However, sa id Mr. lIall, it will not
êwork unloss the County staff is comprised with knowledgoable people
with the expertise to, monitor and administer the contracts. He Baid
that total staff and costs could be reduced, however, they would have
to bo replaced with highly kno~ledgeable "hlgh coat- koy personnel for
administrðtlon. Commissioner Kruso sold that sho belioves thst the
department heads are satisfactorily knowledgeable to know his/her own
buslno.s, and Clerk Rcagan said that the County has encountered
problema In this area in the past. He said that there ~ust be someone
on ataff that has the oxpertise required to tell the contrActor eXActly
what it Is tho County wants. Chairman pistor concurred, adding that
.
Page 83
---------------------------------
I . ,
",
. '
, .
'~
c=J
¡--1
:.--J
-----------------------
""'y 26, 1981
there n.eds to be a Clo4r definition ,of what i. oxpected and exactly
what the County wants and/or need. to be furnished by the outside
contraccor. Also, the contractor ~ust be fully cognizant ot tho
functions of the department which he will .erve,including a thorough
familiarization with available oquipmont. He said that problema have
occured in the past with rogards to tho Dala processing Department,
wherein a contractor did not have tho knowlodge of specific equipment
and would hðvo to hiro those experts.
The number ot timea that tho programs in Data processing have boen
changod was discussed, during which Mr. lIall explained that the County
has dosigned sevoral Dub-syatcms and the process of upgrading those
sub-syst~ms and tying them togother is an ongoing procoss. He said
that this has been the -least cost- approach for immediate results,
howover, the County comes to a point in time where a lot of ravisions
are necessary and it is that time when the County must decide if the
work should be done "in house" or contracted out. In answer to
Commissioner Kruse, Mr. Hall ßaid that ho is not speaking of the
-standard de-bugging" of the program, he is talking about major
revisions and oxpansions of programs. He said that the financial
systems are presently facing this kind of sit~atlon, addln9 that there
will be ð financial systemå evaluation undertaken over the next three
to four ~onths in order to determine if there is a need for outside
purchased contractual services in this area.
CO~~isDioner ~ruso asked if, in order for this concept to work, it
will require department headD to be sincero in their ~otivation towards
involvement in tho initiation of tho contractual service 'concept? Mr.
nall replied affirmatively. Commissionor Wimer said that he believoD
that the Board can bcco~. familiar with the neods of the various areas
~O:)1. 061 :!-oÄt! 8C6
Pa9. 84
---~--------,-------:-------------- -.
~
. _. __...:----..:.... _ _ _ _ _ ~_ _.s...:....- -- -;..:..- -.:. - --'-- -"---
May 26, 1981
f¡ti:>K 061 n~ BOO
where this concept may be applied, ðS well aa the degree to which each
department head will be involveð, by studying the results on the
completed forma recommended by Mr Hall.
CO~ission.r Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse end
carried unanimously, that the Board of County Commissioner's r~.cal
Policy be amended to include the above-referenced paragraph recommended
by the Clerk'. Office and that the form entitled Schedule 9 - LIST OF
ACTIVITIES WHICH COULD BE PERFonMED UNDER CONTRACT WITH COMMERCI~L
t
i
I
!
~
FIRM, be added to the 1981-82 budget worksheet for completion and
submittal by all Deportment heads.
Contractual County parDonnel, such as the County Manager, County
Attorney and the County UtilitIes Manager'. poaltion was discussed
briefly, during which Commissioner Wenzel stated that he would prefer
to havo all of the ~eople In these positions working directly for the
BCC, rather than on a contractual basis such as they are presentlY
employed. He said that he undelstands that these positions are
presently under contract, howover, he wIll not say that he will vote
for the renowal of these contractS. lie s~id that he would prefer to'
discusS this further durin9 tho July meeting when the Environmental
Consultant's position is scheduled on the ~genda. It was the consensU8
of the members of the Board that the matter be deferred until that'
time.
.
*
*
RECESS - TIMEt 2t39 P.M. - 2145 P.M.
Commissioners Wenzol ðnd Brown were not present
when the meeting reconveneð.
.
*
.
Page 05
------------,-:----.-------------------
.'
, .
':=J
c:::}
c:J
-----------------"-----------------
May 26, 1981
REVISED CRITIC~L D^TC SCHEDULE RE COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER EXP~NSION
1\PPROVED, SUBJECT TO TilE CONDITION TI1~T TIME BE REDUCED WHENEVER
POUSIBLE, SPECIAL SERVICES BY POLIZZI/HEERY - APPROVED ^S RECOMMENDED
BY GT^FF
county Manðger Norman presented an overview of whero the
Consultant team of Polizzi/Heery is today regarding the formulation of
plans for the proposed new jal1 facl1ity.'tho apace study for the
governmont complex, and tho resulting changes in scheduling, as
outlined within the Executive Summary datod 5/22/01. lie alBO outlined
the staff recommendatIon to spprove the proposed revised Critical Date
Schedule and the request for authorization of the additional work by
the construction program man4gers in directing and staffing said work
under tho terms of the special ~ervlces portion of their contract, as
outlined in the memorandum from Polizzl/11eery dated May 20, 1961, which
identifies the additional costs as well DB doscribes the proposed
revised critical date Ðchedule.
After a brief discussion, during which Commissioner Kruse urged
that the tlmeframes be moved up wherever possible in an effort to save
~on.y, Commissionor Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner pistor and
carried 3/0, with Commissioners Brown and Wenzel absent, that the
Revised Critical Date Schedule for the County Governm~nt Center
Expansion b. approved, subject to the time being reduced wherever
possiblo, and thðt the Spechl Services by polizzi/lleory be ðpproved as
recommended by the County MAnager.
CONSULT^NT fIRM POLIZZI/BEERY INSTRUCTED TO PL^N FOR 416 BEDS IN
PROPOSED J~IL FACILITY
Mr. Daryl. Balles, Consultant with poli:nl/lIoory, ro!erred to pago
two of the Executive Summary dated 5/26/81, entitled ~UMM~RY
~t)f; 061 WE 807
pag _ B 6
.-....... - .....- .....-_..-..._".~.._...-..__............
...~..,'_...-.__..._...~..-.....__.- -... ..... ..
,
¡
¡
I
I
I
i
¡
,
\
í
, ---------------------------------
~t~ Oíii :vm8Q8
. May 26, 1981
COMP^RATIVE ^N^LYSIS ALTERN~TE JAIL CONSTRUCTION CT^ND~RDS Collier
Collier Government Complex~ and explained the reGulta of each of the
five col~ns of fiqures thereof. Each prograM division wa. explained
and sub.equent ce~~ent. were tertheo_ing tro~ the Board. Mr. Oailea
EXPLAINED the diffenceø between the A.C.A. Minimum standards, the State
of Florida Minimum requirements and the State of Florida Minimua
Requlre~entø (all øingle cell). He oxpounded on the tabulations for
square footage requirements for each of tho six program divisions and
he concluded each of these ,explanations with the sum total of square
feet finally arrived at by his firm referred to in the summary..
Revised Preliminary R~port of Findings ·E~hibit ~..
Mr. Balles requested that the Board give him some final direction
a. to which they wished to adopt - Exhibit -A", Revised preliminary
Report Of Findingsl Exhibit "0", AC^ Minimum Requiremcntsl or, Exhibit
.C., Stnte of Florida Hlnlmum Requirements for the proposed nev jail
facility. He also requested that the Board make a final determination
as to how many beds they wished the new jail to have.
. -II ·
Commissioner Wlmer'left the meeting during the discussion -2155 P.M.
Commissionor Drown entcred tho meeting in progrcss at 3110 P.M.
. . .
After a general discussion as to the various alternatives, Sheriff
Aubrey Rogers was asked what he felt is an accurate reflection of tho
number of bods that will be needed over tho ten years proposed to ,be
covered in the plans for a new jail. Sheriff Rogers said that he tend.
to agree with the projection by Polizzl/Hoery that 416 beds vill be
needod in ten years. Ho clarified that this figure mayor may not be
adequate because no one knows at th1s time which direction the court.
v111 take regarding tho incarceration of convicted persona. However,
Page 87
---------~------~------~~--------
, .
J
----'
í----l
::::J
"
---------------,-----------------" ,
4}.
Ma y 2 t} , 1 981
to the best of his ability, this ae.m. to be an accurate and re.aonablo
figure. He further said that ho would prefer to 800 aingle bod celle,
rather than multiple bod cell., aa this would allow for bettor socurity
and control in the jail. Shoriff RogerS also commented that an
expanded modical/dental and pharmacy area is needed for physical
exaDinations, storage ðnd control of drugs, and dontal facilities
because the jail purchases its own drugs, and must have a safe place in
which to store them that con Also offor good contr~l and security
lIeasures. Also, priøoners cannot always be taken to the Itealth
Department all tho time bocauso they are admitted all during the day
and night and the Health Department ia only open during tho day from
Monday to Fr1dllY. lie exphined the need to mod icate pr honers
everyday, tho need to givo physical examinations in-housø to incoming
prisoners, etc. and how all of this relates to the noed for such a
room.
Mr. McNeel statod thAt the rovisod proposal by polizzi/Heery has
eliminated tho indoor recreation room with gymnasium facilitios that
brought forth so much controverGY during on earlier presentation, and
that subsequently there has beon a reduction of over 4,000 sq. ft. at a
substantial sDvings of dollars. He said that an outdoor utilitarian
area is being proposed instead, which will serve several purposes,
including an outdoor recreation/exercise area as well as a placo where
securlty~ould bo maintained and prisonors could be temporarily kopt in
the event that the jail building would have to be evacuated for any
re.son. There will also be a multl~purpo8e room, centrally located and
offerlng the Ðbility to houso additionð1 prisoners, if needed, aD well
as recre.tional activities, i.o. card playing, watching telovision,
etc. ^lso explained by Mr. McNeel was the proposal for a contact
~t~ Ofji .~Att 809
Page 88
-----:---------.-------:-- - ------ ---.- -- --
.
·...... ...----.'. ,.".- -" ,--- -- '.'-" --,-..,.--.. ..' ,------,..---..- -.-
tCOI'. OB1 t~¡;[ 810
May 215, 1901
vialtin9 roo~, which would allow for visitation of fa~ilies, and atill
allow for security.
Also discus.ed was the proposal for a commissary for the new jail,
during which Sheriff RogerS stated that the jail la allowed to aell
many items such as cigerettes and candy, etc. and that .the profit
.
earned (15') 18 applied towards the purchas. of tolevisions, magazine.,
.tc. This commissary will allow for a .afe storage for ouch articles
and provido a form of control and provide for the purcha.. of ~any
articles for use of the prisoners, including exorcise equipment.
rollowing a general discussion, Mr. Bailes asked the Board for a
decision ao to how many bods that his firms should plan for over the
next ten years for the proposed new jail, explaining that the ad hoc
committee for space study will bu meeting soon and, oleo, ho will need
oomething In writing to present to the State authorities in order to
seok their approval of the proposed plans for tho jail. Mr. Bailes
explained that the State has tho last word on the approval of anything
that the Boord may approve, and that although the County may meet what
they beliove to be State requiremonts, the State reserves tho ri9ht to
9ive final approval.
COunty Manager Norman explained that tho proposals by Polizzi/-
Heory Are based on a 90' utilization factor in any given peak day.
Sheriff Rogers said that he would be happy to go along with th-
recommendations outlined in -Exhibit A-, and reminded the Doard that
Seminole County has just completed a jail that they thought would be
adequate when It was planned and have found that lt ia too oma11 now
that they have moved into it. He cautioned against planning too 8mall
and said that he bolievoS the projoction of 416 beds is falr.
Commissioner Kruse moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
pago 89
---------~------.-----.------------
, ,
.'
, .
,..---",
..ø-J
c:::J
::::J
· '
------------. ----........---------- ------'.
May 26, 1981
~arri.d 3/0, with Commissionore Wimer and Wonzel absent, that the
con.ultants plan ~16 beds for the proposod now jail over the ney.t ten
year..
REVISED PRELIMINARY REPORT OF FINDINGS RE SPACE NEED ANALYSIS (JAIL
'^CILITY) (EX\1IBIT "A") _ ADOPTED. POLIZZI/IIEERY AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED
WITH PROJECT
, Aftor the above-referonced discussion, and upon complotlon of 4
brief explanation of the differences in costa of dovelopment of tho
alternate plans outlined earlier by Mr. Bailes, Commissioner Brown
moved, Goconded by commissioner Kruse and carried 3/0, with
Commissioners Wlmer and Wenzel absent, that the RevlGed preliminary
Report of Findings re space noed analys:e of the proposed jail
facil1ties known as Exhibit -A- be adopted and that polizzi/Beery be
authorized to proceed with the project.
':
Commissioner Kruse asked the consultants to be sure and explain to
anyone who might ask why the single bed coIls were chosen, including
tho.. referred to earller by Sheriff Rogers, i.e. safety of priooners,
security, hoalth and welfare of prisoners, control, scgregation of
prisoners according to the seriousne.. of their crlmes, backgrounds,
etc.
MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE - FILED AND/OR REFERRED
There being no objection, the Chair directed that the following
~C~( 061 r~8U:
Pa98 90
.. e' _. ..
..-.---.-.---..'-'. --_..~_.~."...- -...----------.
~
,----------------------------- ---
8C~ 081 ;f,AtE 8j,.2,
Hay 2fi, '1981
corr.spondenco be filed and/or reforrod to the various departments .s
Indicated.
1. Letter d,nted May 12, 1901, from Clydesdale Bank Limited,
London, England, re Sir Robert Mc^lpine ,. Sons (Trado
Invcøtmentø) ~irnited Guaranteo, requesting releaae of
guaranteo postod January 8th 1960. xc Fi~cal Officer, T.
Kuck, Engineer, Filed.
2. Petition dated May 18, 1981 with 13 signatures from residents
on Goldcoast Court requesting relief from various problems
regarding tho installation and construction of the sewer lIne
to tho subject stroet. xc Utllltios Manager, Filed.
3. Copy of letter dated May 7, 1981 from Florida Dcpart~ent of
^griculture & Consumer Sorvices, to Community Development
Administrator from Chris Andoraon, Collier County Forester,
recapping tho April Forestry Division Report. Filed.
4. Memorandum from Mary G. Prasch, Assistant Court Administra-
tor, tran~mittlng the monthly record of juvcniles incarcer-
ated in the Collier County jail for the months of March and
April 1981. Filed.
S. petition recoived May 22, 1981 supportinq the City and the
County for their offortD to ~stablishing a bike path systom
and containing four paqes of signaturos. xc County Engineer,
Filed.
6. Lottcr dated May 20, 1901 from Michael C. Walton, Attorney
for Muriel M. and William F Seymore, objecting on their
bchnlf to a petition filed by Don~ld E. and Phyllis ~.
Powless to vacato Lots 15 nnd 16, Block 185, Golden Gate,
Unit G., and requesting notification ðS to the BCC's decision
re aarn~ whon final. xc County Engineer, Filed.
7. Letter d~ted May 20, 1981 from John M. Birnie, ropresenting
Muriel Seymour, objecting on her behalf to the vacation of a
Lots 15 , 16, Block 185, Golden Gate. xc County Enqineer,
riled.
8. Copy of the minutes of The Naples City Council, May 6, 19B1.
Filed.
PðCJ8 91
.----------.----------------..,.-------
. . ,
c:J
c=J
:=J
, .
.,
. '
----------------------.--------- --,
May 26, 1981
9. Copy of the Colden CAto community Center ~dvisory Committe.
meeting minuteD of Match 31,1901, note of no ~oeting held on
April, 1981 and copies of calendars fot both months re
activities at the Community Center. FUod. ,~.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*
.
.
There being no further buslnoßs for tho good of tho County, the
meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair - Times 3s57 P.M.
BO~RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL
DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL
~
.. :
r" .
-:
4
~ '
.I
c
('
,..,
.':
'~,
~ ,,". \' ".
II
&COK 061 PACE 813
Peg e 92
-------------------------------.
~