Agenda 04/12/2011 Item # 6C
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
~..'it
VlJ
Office of the County Manager
Leo E. Ochs, Jr.
3299 Tamiami Trail East. Suite 202. Naples Florida 34112.5746' (239) 252-8383' FAX: (239) 252-4010
April 1, 2011
Ms. Laura Dejohn
Johnson Engineering
4915 Rattlesnake Hammock Road #214
Naples FL 34113
Re: Public Petition from Ms. Laura Dejohn of Johnson Engineering representing the East Naples
Foundation requesting coordination of efforts with the County.
Dear Ms. Dejohn,
Please be advised that you are scheduled to appear before the Collier County 80ard of Commissioners at
the meeting of April 12, 2011, regarding the above referenced subject.
_.
Your petition to the 80ard of County Commissioners will be limited to ten minutes. Please be advised
that the Board will take no action on your petition at this meeting. However, your petition may be
placed on a future agenda for consideration at the 80ard's discretion. If the subject matter is currently
under litigation or is an on-going Code Enforcement case, the 80ard will hear the item but will not
discuss the item after it has been presented. Therefore, your petition to the Board should be to advise
them of your concern and the need for action by the Board at a future meeting.
The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Board's Chambers on the Third Floor of the W. Harmon Turner
8uilding (8uilding "F") of the government complex. Please arrange to be present at this meeting and to
respond to inquiries by Board members.
If you require any further information or assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
SincerelY;L ~;=, d-
~effield
8usiness Operations Manager
MJS:mjb
cc: Jeffrey Klatzkow, County Attorney
Norman Feder, Administrator, Growth Management
Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator, Growth Management
-
Packet Page -40-
.,'....n'''\'''.....
4/12/2011 Item B.C.
Request to Speak under Public Petition
Please print
Name: East Naples Foundation(ENF)/ Power Point Presentation by Laura DeJohn
of Johnson EnQineerina (JE) representinQ the ENF.
Address: 4915 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd # 214, Naples, FL 34113
Phone: Jim Pusateri. ENF Pres. 239-775-7029/ Karen Homiak. ENF Treas. 239-774-4264
Laura DeJohn. JE 239-280-4331
Date of the Board Meeting you wish to speak: April 12, 2011
Must circle yes or no:
Is this subject matter under litigation at this time?
Ves I ffiil
Is this subject matter an ongoing Code Enforcement case? Ves IINol
Note: If either answer is "yes", the Board will hear the item but will have no
discussion regarding the item after it is presented.
.'Iease explain in detail the reason you are requesting to speak (attach additional
page if necessary): Back UP - East Trail Vision Booklet
The East Naples Foundation. a 501 (c) (3) non-profit orQanization, needs fundina to
complete the community plannina exercise it has undertaken for the followinQ purpose:
To develop a Master Plan for the East Trail Corridor which will encouraae planned
arowth, both commercial and residential. that is compatible with the unique natural
resources of the area, resultinQ in an enhanced auality of life for all residents.
Please explain in detail the action you are asking the Commission to take (attach
additional page if necessary): Back UP - ENF brochure out/inina reauest.
Our request is for the BCC to direct appropriate staff to coordinate with the ENF
President on a partnerina strateay to seek plannina arants as they may come available
for aovernment entities or aovernmentlnon-profit partnerships. Upon establishina a
partnerina strateay with staff, we'd return to the BCC for approval of the strateay - in
which we'd define who will participate on the County's behalf, what the County's and
ENF's roles will be. and how the arant-seekina and arant application activities would be
manaaed.
.,.,,,...,
C:\Documents and Settings\hetzeU\Deslctop\public petition.doc
Packet Page -41-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 6.C.
Item Summary: Public Petition from Ms. Laura Dejohn of Johnson Engineering
representing the East Naples Foundation requesting coordination of efforts with the County.
Meeting Date: 4/12/2011
Prepared By
Name: BrockMaryJo
Title: Executive Secretary to County Manager, CMO
4/5/20] 1 8:51:46 AM
Submitted by
Title: Executive Secretary to County Manager, CMO
Name: BrockMary.To
4/5/20118:51:47 AM
Approved By
Name: SheffieldMichael
Title: Manager-Business Operations, CMO
Date: 4/5/2011 9:30:03 AM
Packet Page -42-
c
:;t
.,g
.2
'CL1
...c
.-'
- --
";: l'll 0
.. - III
Ol'llCLI
U.U U, .'
-......'"
"- CLI ~....
~Eoc
I- III CLI,
....ECLI'tl
III 0 ""iii
l'll lJ iii CLI, ;
W..c....'
CLI....~=
..cO....l'll
......al'll..
.. C 0
O.cCLI-
_....~CL1
; ~.2"~
c: .. C-
en~O
..
CLI'tlCLI>-
.... CU.c:!:: ....,
'" ...,_ a:::
l'll C..c l'll
~C....~
c l'll"- cr
l'llii=='tl
CoCLICLICLI
.,g en:i:i lJ
CLI l'll"- C
>......l'll
CLI~l'll..c
'tlOCoC
u E QI
~coc
CLI u l'll
....
....
..
o
.:t:
CLI
en
C
.-
C
C
..!!!
Co
"~
..c
....
C
~
l'll
...
..
CLI
'tl
C
~
,','
In
.
"
"
.
,
"
.
~
~
(l\la V>l~~a ~"..s
;;
"
~
I
~
w'
r#~~: ~' i;;~' -,
.o'L~ 0~,(0.'lt ~iiii~':1":
"'0,,""" -"'~
. ~ :,"f- 'U ~J
, ",,"~ c''''
sfO.' c'."':"":'
~ r.!)".,
f/) iF'"
~, ^.:t;!b'~ .,,,i"
. ,,~~',,',~~
,j
u
c
~
, "'
-+;
. ,~, l.,:.
\-, '-
10
", ,~~.
Col"" 8M:!
@
"'
P^i8J.'1I0::J,",
.,,;.'
C
<1l III
~ ~ 10'
S <30
f-.- 8-- "
; - 'e)"";'""-
'.!'
..
,,,,
'"
':l:
'~
n:
tl"..~: l';i,,~
..!!2 .~ ,"""
C;..S::' t.
l'J:; C: .~:"'-
~ ~ ~z
,
,
" _ ~."i
: Ii.
I .i
U,,'\f~'
, ;~ Z'r""'"'
',: w'<t
, a: Vl
a::J
o~
a: 0'1
a: a:
au
u
z
,
.
~
,
~
~& ~ -
:]
1.<""'.)
Go"^}'"Of H"'-OO
\ "
,
!
'I
i
Ii
~~'
i ~
5
1-
\~';l-'
"~,,ii'
"
~i,
;,'
,~ '-,
~.otJ I,N" ^"jOOO
vi'
ClJ
0.
<t>
:"J C Z
U") 0
~
c
ClJ
E
0.
o
ill
>
ClJ
u
1:'
s
o
.c.
~
co
<t>
Ll.J
ClJ
-'"
co
:J
u
'":i 0
::J~
S 3
'- ClJ
co
C
~'1 ~
::u VI
ClJ
-'"
:J <t>
::J ~ ~
'...J t:..!:: ro
--., ~
o C:i S 01
1.J > V'l ro
~ ClJ m u
s ~ c
8 0 ro ro
:u:r:: u Vl
1) ..- -0
. - 0
-:l :::- n.. 0
::J C 1'0 .-
::l rn-:::
:":l 0 0 0
-' U OJ..t:J
..f) ClJ tn..c
1)- O'l
:J1 ;2 .~ .w
~ s ~ c
~ Q} tj OJ
:: .:= O..c
VI :- 0 VI
'U 0 ...... ()
~o
C<..;-....
:J <t>
o "..;:::;
U ~
ClJ ~
o
0.
-:;:0
C
LU C > c
0 co :J ClJ
.~ co 0 U U
<t> ClJ U ClJ ClJ
:J u U
<t> 0 .c. ..Q :J
~ ~ <t> U
> 0. .-
Ll.J o S c !='
co <t> is.
'>, ~ = ~
co ClJ co ClJ
~ .c. S :J
C ~ co ..Q
:J C co U U
0 ~
0 CC C :J
U E
c <t> 0
ClJ 00 -'" ~ u
~ c
'" ~ "- ClJ C
4- V> ~ 'u <t>
0 <t> ClJ "-
ClJ .c. ~ CC U
co 4- ~
U >, <t> ClJ ClJ ClJ
C ~ ~ 1:' ~ ~
<t> C co <t>
~ :J co 0 <t> 0.
0. 0 ClJ E ~ 1:'
ClJ u
u 0. ClJ 0.
u ClJ <t> ClJ .c.
<t> ~ Z > ~ ClJ
'" .9! ~ ~
co ~ <t>
<1:: u co co
<t> U ~
U ClJ Ll.J <t> ClJ C
0 ~ S
~ ." 0 ClJ
C ~ ~ ~ ClJ E
0 c '" co U U
0. co ClJ 'u
C ClJ > c
:::> <t> > .~ C ClJ
~ ClJ u 0 E
. . ~
c:::: >, ClJ ClJ u <t>
c:::c -:;:0 ..Q B u u
c ClJ 0 :J ClJ
u.J ClJ S 0:: 0 co
u <t>
aJ ClJ <l:: S ..Q
0..: Ll.J ~
.J:: co ~ ClJ 0::
<t> .c. 0 <l::
l- S ~ ~ co Ll.J
,
w ;;
.'? - i=-
UJ~) ~~
---' T ~ 0::
S J) ~ ~ 6:
~ .~ ::J S ~
o 0 [-J 0 !tl
~
z
w
"
n:#
Om
~.
~
Packet Page -45-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision for the East Trail Corridor
Table of Contents
Introduction
Master Plan Study Process
Context 3
History
Land Use Characteristics
Circulation
Population Characteristics
Neighborhoods and Housing Conditions
Economic Conditions and Trends
Environmental Characteristics
Past Planning Efforts
East Trail Visioning Process 10
Public Involvement
Applicable Planning Principles
The East Trail Vision Statement 14
Goals & Stratcgics
Attachment: Vision Concept Plan
Appendix: Demographic page ti-om Economic Dcvelopment Council
of Collier County's "Market Facts 2008-2009"
Public Input Meeting documents
Packet Page -46-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision for the East Trail Corridor
1~
The East Naples Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that is continuing the
community project initiated by the East Naples Civic Association's Strategic Planning
Committee. This project is an endeavor to create a plan to promote planned growth for
the future of the "East Trail" (Tamiami Trail East I U.S. 41 East) corridor in Collier
County.
The East Naples Foundation enVISIOns development along the East Trail over time
according to a community based master plan. This is not about the road itself. This
effort is not an evaluation of how many lanes or how much asphalt should be poured on
US 41. This vision for the future focuses on the property, the buildings, and the features
along the East Trail. These features will ultimately be developed and redeveloped in a
way that either contributes to or detracts from a sense of identity, character, place and
functionality for the people who live along and travel the corridor.
The Study Area is a stretch of approximately 14 miles beginning at Airport Pulling Road
adjacent to the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Areal to County Road 92.
The Study Area covers a long distance of roadway with varied characteristics and
multiple functions serving both travelers and neighbors. The functions of the corridor
span the spectrum, from the northernmost portions that can serve as a "main street" for
established communities in East Naples, to the southernmost portion that is a scenic route
through the Collier-Seminole State Park and rural agricultural lands.
The future character of the corridor will be dictated over the next twenty years as many
currently developed sites reach the end of their structural and functional lives, and many
undeveloped lands face development pressure. The East Naples Foundation identifies the
need to focus the activity, growth and opportunities of the corridor in a way that best and
most efficiently serve the people living, working, owning land, or doing business along
the East Trail corridor.
The East Naples Foundation has undertaken this planning effort for the following
purpose:
To develop a Master Plan for the U.S. 41 Tamiami Trail corridor which
will encourage planned growth, both commercial and residential, that is
compatible with the unique natural resources of the area, resulting in an
enhanced quality of life for all residents.
I The East Trail Corridor Study Area defined for this planning effort does encompass some property within
the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area (eRA) boundary, however the
recommendations of this Vision for the East Trail Corridor are only for lands outside of the eRA
boundary. Any reference to property within the eRA. boundary is only conceptual in nature, and is not
intended to alter or vary from the eRA' s Redevelopment Plan that guides and governs all future
development within the CR.^-.
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
I
Packet Page -47-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision/or the East Trail Corridor
Master Plan Study Process
The objective of this master planning effort is to anticipate, plan and identifY adjustments
to regulatory framework so that the East Trail corridor grows viably while protecting
quality of life. Current conditions have been documented and analyzed. Community
interests have been defined and prioritized in this Vision for the future. This Vision will
ultimately be translated into a master plan document complete with goals, policies, and
implementation mechanisms that ensure sustained adherence to principles of the plan.
The following outline provides the detailed steps of this master planning effort. Steps I
and 2 have already been completed. This Vision document fulfills Step 3.
1. Existing Conditions Inventory - Professional planners, engineers and ecologists
collected, tabulated, and mapped existing conditions along the corridor, including:
corridor boundaries, land use, zoning, utilities, drainage, transportation, demographics,
and design characteristics.
2. Public Workshop - A meeting was held March 30, 2009 to display collected data and
solicit input from the community and stakeholders to identifY the area's strengths and
weaknesses, Iikcs and dislikes, and desires for the future.
3, Vision - Professional planning consultants prioritize the goals and objectives of
the community within the framework of existing conditions and potential for the
future. The vision is embodied in a statement document and an image that conveys
both the concept for the development of the corridor and the illustration of the
segments, gateways, nodes, opportunities and constraints along the corridor.
4. East Trail Plan - This plan documcnt will outlinc the goals, objectives and policics
that providc a framework f()r thc developmcnt community and the public agcncies to
achicve an outcome consistent with thc vision for the corridor. The East Trail Plan will
provide thc following: background data and analysis, and guidelines for planned
transportation, land use and urban dcsign c1cmcnts. The Plan will also identify nccessary
improvements and rccommcnded mcthods and criteria to achieve thc desired results.
Recommendcd methods may includc: inccntivcs, pcrfonnance standards, f0n11 based
codcs or new developmcnt standards.
5. Public Input - A sccond meeting will be held with thc community and stakeholdcrs to
gathcr input and answer qucstions related to the draft Corridor Plan.
6. Adoption - Collier County staff, Advisory Boards and Commissioners must review
and consider the Plan for adoption.
7. Implementation - After the Plan is adopted, the implementation of the plan may
involve: Growth Management Plan amcndmcnts. such as new Future Land Use
designations, overlays or commcrcial location cliteria; Land Development Code
amendments, such as new zoning districts or ovcrlays; capital improvement plan updates;
new funding strategies; and new public outrcach strategies or programs.
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
2
Packet Page -48-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision for the East Trail Corridor
~
"History of the Tamiami Trail," Authority of the Tamiami Trail Commissioners and the County Commissioners of
Dade County, Florida, t928.
HistOlY
Opened in ] 928, the Tamiami Trail has long provided a critical connection for the State
of Florida, from Tampa to Miami. The importance of this route as a state connector has
been overtaken by newer highway improvements to Interstate 75 that is now the high
capacity route connecting the Fort Lauderdale area to Tampa and points nOJih.
Much of the Tamiami Trail that runs along the west coast now functions as an aJierial
roadway running through urban and suburban areas. Cities along the west coast have
made efforts to redefine the arterial roadway to better fit their communities. These
communities have found through traffic studies that the T amiami Trail is often utilized
more for local trips rather than long distance trips. This means the Trail corridor should
develop with local contcxt and character similar to a "main street" rather than a
throughway in an urbanized area. Other portions of the Trail are much more scenic,
where the landscape stretches for miles over agricultw-al lands, the Everglades, and other
protected parklands.
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
3
Packet Page -49-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision/or the East Trail Corridor
(!)
>~~
~.
'~ ;~~~ri';
'~'r-;:; :'
,~~?
e."
0'/"
\0., ~::, .,~,_,;'.-'~.
_~:;,V"
,..;,'f.;;;;<,.
Land Use Characteristics
The development along Collier County's East Trail from Airport Road to County Road
92 is a reflection of a wide range of land uses. The Study Area dcfined for this East Trail
Master Plan Study begins to thc northwest at the intersection of Airport Road and the
East Trail, where the Collier County Govemment Complex is located. The southeastern
tcmlinus of the Study Arca is the intersection of County Road 92 and thc East Trail,
where the Collicr-Seminole State Park begins.
Due to the geographic extent of the l4-mile stretch of the Study Area, the area has been
divided into four Se6'111ents, depicted on the attached Vision Concept Plan. All the
segment lines do not cOlTespond with major roadways because the segments were divided
according to transitions in land usc patterns.
. Segment 1 is approximately 2 miles between Airport Pulling Road and Valley
Stream Drive. Segment I includes Lake Avalon and the intersection of
Rattlesnake Hammock Boulevard.
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
4
Packet Page -50-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision/or the East Trail Corridor
. Segment 2 is approximately 2.5 miles, from Valley Stream Drive to Navajo
Trail. Segment 2 contains mostly developed or planned residential
neighborhoods including Sabal Bay, Lely Country Club, Naples Manor, Treviso
Bay, and Whistler's Cove.
. Segment 3 is approximately 3.5 miles, from Navajo Trail to Naples Reserve
Boulevard. Segment 3 includes Lely Resort, Eagle Creek, the C.R. 951
intersection, and the new Super WalMart.
. Segment 4 is the longest segment, measuring approximately 6 miles, from
Naples Reserve Boulevard to County Road 92. This includes Reflection Lakes,
Fiddlers Creek, Six Ls Farm and Collier Seminole State Park.
The corridor is characterized by the established neighborhoods of East Naples, which
gradually transition to the southeast to more golf course communities and suburban and
rural style development. ln Se6'1nents 1 and 2 the commercial property along the East
Trail was limited in size after the widening of US 41, so that much of the commercial
land in these se6'111ents is underutilized.
The corridor is bisected by the intersection at County Road 951. This intersection is an
important crossroads because County Road 951 connects Naples to Marco Island going
south, and connects to the 1-75 interchange going north. The intersection is developing
with commercial shopping centers and big box retailers.
Moving to the southeast, the development along the corridor becomes more sparse, with
some suburban neighborhoods and more rural and agricultural lands. Potential for a new
self-sustaining neighborhood exists on the property owned by 6Ls Farm at the
southeastern end of the corridor, which is a large land area designated on the County
Future Land Use Map as eligible for a rural village.
For this planning effort, the Study Area has been limited to properties along the East Trail
within a half-mile distance from the centerline of the Trail. This half-mile dimension
allows our study to encompass parks and schools that are in close proximity and are
important to the corridor. The half-mile dimension also allows us to represent and
evaluate walkability in the fonn of pedestrian sheds.
Jolmson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
5
Packet Page -51-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision/or the East Trail Corridor
OAVI~flL':D
~.
"
s ~""
~"
I-~
ESTEY AVE
(Du~ 1"lo<'$11l<' 51..U~")
Ccnuner:::ia1 Re~idenrial
348.76 659.38
32.S1% 62.0300
TotalA::reL
1063.03
100%
~
il
!!
"
~
"
r:.J
. ,j!.:....
---:?~'\ '.
RqT ...EnM,<:t HAMV\:JC,",
-." ~""""':;. ...-- ,,-~,'
..---- ._--_._---_..__._-_._-_.~.,
I AMENDED. JA.NUARY ~5. 20(,7
I . _~~~o ~~B}__~
1j]
[. C.l';.O.::, :.f-
- -
'J,'3
Miles
~:::>~.:.
::::1;'::.::;-:;:::"::.:....,.
c::J. ~.,.,_..."',,:~_,.r,_,
-,,''''.,.......'''...
......"...n.....<.
TR-4
South U.S 41 Transportation
Concurrency Exception Areo (TCEA)
1.."........>C"..".'...".H.x~.".1
::::'~.~.,.,,( ::,;',::~:~~:;:!:; ~~~',~~::::-".:0-,',"";:'~
Circulation
The East Trail is a signitlcant artcrial roadway that scrves the East Naples community.
The predominant mode of travel is by automobile. although the East Trail cOlTidor has
opportunities for alternative modes as well. The Collier County Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) labels the East Trail from Rattlesnake Hammock Road and north
into the City of Naples as a '"Congested Con-idor." The Collier County Growth
Management Plan delineates the U.S. 41 Transportation Concun-ency Exception Area
(TCEA) at the northwest p0l1ion of the East Trail trom Rattlesnakc Hammock Road and
north to Davis Boulcvard. This dcsignation is established pursuant to FlOlida law in
rccognition of communities who adopt strategies for Urban Infill and Urban
Redcvelopment. This area of the East Trail is granted exceptions from traftic
concurrency because a varicty of uses are in closc proximity, and provisions for
altcrnatives to auto-only circulation are availablc. Such alternatives include: bike racks,
bus stops, mixed use devclopmcnt, and sidewalks. which are considered appropriate
sol utions to congested conditions.
Alternative modes exist and are planned for cxpansion along the corridor. The Collier
Area Transit service has bus routes j1-0111 the northwestern extent of the Study Area to
Greenway Road, and a future transit route is proposed to extend south to C .R. 92.
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
6
Packet Page -52-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Visionfor the East Trail Corridor
Sidewalks are primarily located within the East Trail right-of-way from the northwestern
tip of the Study Area to Naples Manor subdivision. Pathways are proposed to extend
from C.R. 951 south in the future. Bike lanes are primarily located within the corridor
from the northwestern tip of the Study Area to the Rattlesnake Hammock intersection.
Bike lanes are proposed extending south from C.R. 951 in the future.
Population Characteristics
Collier County's Comprehensive Planning Department delineates planning communities
and generates population figures for each area. The planning communities that relate to
the East Trail corridor are the East Naples, South Naples and Royal Fakapalm planning
communities. The County's statistics project population growth from 68,724 people in
2008 to 98,876 people in 2020, constituting an increase of 30,152 residents (an increase
of 44%). The figures show small growth of population in East Naples (northeastern.
portion of the corridor), an increase of 51% in South Naples (central portion of the
corridor) and growth that nearly doubles the population in the outlying Royal Fakapalm
area.
from Economic Development Council of Collier County's "Market Facts 2008-2009"
SO""C!: C::.!her::-....n-y C~n'nreh~n:;t'''! P :J'""l""":J ::~Far:n;~....~, P_e'.,i~e::: c..:os
The 2000 Census data for Census Tracts adjacent to the East Trail corridor indicates a
median household income of $39,405 for this area, which slightly exceeded the State of
Florida's median household income of$38,819.
Neighborhood and Housing Conditions
The East Trail is a community of many neighborhoods. Older established neighborhoods
are located at the nOlihwestern pOliion of the corridor. proximate to many community
facilities.
From Rattlesnake Hammock Road and south, eXlstmg and planned large golf course
communities are the predominant neighborhood type, with the exception of some
established single family subdivisions including Naples Manor. Housing characteristics
range from older single family structures in established neighborhoods, to newer single
and multifamily structures in the gated and golf course communities. A cross section of
the community is served, from entry level housing to luxury estates.
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
7
Packet Page -53-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision for the East Trail Corridor
South of C.R. 951, single family developments have been approved and developed along
side established larger tract subdivisions that accommodate rural single family homes and
some mobile homcs. Fiddlers Creek is a large community permitted for residential
development along an extensive section of this pmi of the corridor. Potential for a new
self-sustaining neighborhood exists on the property owned by 6Ls Farm at the
southeastern end of the corridor, which is a large land area desil,'Ilated on the County
Future Land Use Map as eligible for a rural village.
Economic Conditions and Trcnds
After years of dramatic economic growth through the last decade, economic conditions
have deteriorated for the country, the state, and particularly southwest Florida. Housing
and construction were primary economic drivers for this area throughout the past decade,
and the housing market has been in sharp decline since reaching its peak in 2005.
Development projects that were approvcd in recent years are facing financial difficulty as
homebuying lags behind market supply. With the drop in homebuying and consumer
spending, the commercial development supporting rcsidential areas along thc East Trail
has also suffered decline. Busincsses have closed and some new commercial
devclopments remain unoccupied. Economists indicate the outlook is a slow, steady
recovery over the next several years.
With thc development of a ncw hospital on County Road 951 near Rattlesnake Hammock
Road, along with thc County Governmcnt Center that will cndure as a major workplace,
the East Trail con'idor is an arc a that can continue to attract new residents and suppOli
ncw business if properly planncd.
Em'irolllllcntal Charactcristics
Beyond the most urban portions of thc cOlTidor. arcas sU1T(mnding the East Trail arc rich
in environmcntal quality. Sugden Park and Eagle Lakes Park provide a glimpse of the
natural features for the residents to enjoy in the more developed areas of the corridor.
The Collicr-Seminolc State Park at the southeastern tenninus of the corridor is a large
protected natural area. South and cast of the Study arca are Panther Zones designated by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Collier County's cnvironmental policies and
standards havc govemed the development of subdivisions built over the past 10-15 years
so that significant native vegetation is preserved and maintained in perpetuity. Such
environmental regulations shall continue to be observed and followed as the corridor
dcvclops, with a focus on avoiding impacts to wetlands and critical habitat for protected
specIes.
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
8
Packet Page -54-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision for the East Trail Corridor
Past Planning efforts
The Community Character Plan for Collier County ("Character Plan") was completed in
2001. The Character Plan set forth goals and implementation steps to redefine centers of
activity and quality neighborhoods throughout the County. The Character Plan identified
the need to focus on building human scale settings rather than auto-oriented, single use
developments. The Plan illustrated photos that were ranked as the least appealing images
of Collier County according to a public image survey. As shown below, all three of the
lowest ranking photos were taken in East Naples. The Character Plan also included a
conceptual design study of the Naples Town Center shopping center, showing how infill
development could revitalize the declining strip mall as a mixed use center of activity.
The Character Plan put forth valuable plarming strategies and implementation steps to
promote quality design of the built environment in Collier County. Only a few of the
recommendations have resulted in new policies or techniques applied in the processing of
development projects.
Isle of Capri Road Tamiami Trail East Naples Town Center
The three lowest rated images from the Community Character Plan for Collier County
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
Packet Page -55-
9
4/12/2011 Item S.C.
Vision/or the East Trail Corridor
&'ad &r-roAi "O~ g>"oc~~
Per Florida Statutes Section 163.3177 (13), local governments are encouraged to develop
a community vision that provides for sustainable growth, recognizes its fiscal constraints,
and protects its natural resources. The stakeholders along the East Trail corridor realize
that their future must be planned according to a vision that directs !,'Towth in an orderly
manner in appropriate locations. This visioning process for the East Trail incorporates
public involvement and applicable planning principles to arrive at a vision concept plan
and a vision statement with supporting goals and strategies to direct future development
along the corridor.
Public Involvement
A Public Input Meeting was held on March
30, 2009 to survey the priority issues of
property owners and residents along the
East Trail corridor. Property owners
adjacent to the East Trail and neighborhood
associations adjacent to the Study Area wcre
notified of thc meeting by mail, and it was
advertised in the Collier Citizen newspapcr.
An Image Preference Survey was conducted
with approximately 40 meeting attendees.
Thc Image Preference Survey consisted of
40 picturcs takcn both along the East Trail
and in other areas of Collier and Lee
Counties. Pictures ranged Ii-om rural scenic
vicws to urban hardscapes. The results of
the Image Preferencc Survey revcalcd that
the most favored llnagcs were wcll
landscaped semi urban and suburban scenes,
as illustrated to the right and below.
""h~i~;'
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 20] 0
10
Packet Page -56-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision/or the East Trail Corridor
The images that were ranked as least favorable during the Image Survey are depicted
below. These images portray auto-oriented uses along roadways that are characteristic of
sprawl-like development.
-
~
Meeting attendees also answered individual questionnaires about their likes, dislikes and
vision for the East Trail's future. The issues most commented on by meeting attendees
concerned:
I. Development types (preferences for types of businesses and communities)
2. Aesthetic issues (appearance of roadsides and buildings)
3. Traffic (safety and convenience for cars and pedestrians)
Other comments rcccived relatcd to recreation, natural resources, community services,
and public safety.
For the final phase of the Public Input Meeting, attendees divided into workgroups of
four to eight participants. The workgroups focused on one of the four segments of the
corridor. The participants identified positives, negatives, and future goals for each
segment. The results of this exercise revealed that top priorities for all groups were
related to development types and aesthetics. Less noted were the other issues of
connectivity, natural resources, recrcation and public safety.
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
II
Packet Page -57-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision for the East Trail Corridor
Applicable Planning Principles
Using the available data and priorities from the perspective of stakeholders along the
corridor, it is evident that a continuation of the past development patterns for twenty
more years into the future will not bring about desirable results. Today's struggling
commercial strip centers, disconnected neighborhoods, and automobile oriented buildings
and uses are not the tools for successful community development in the future. The
spread of suburban development sprawling into rural areas is a pattern the Florida
Legislature has identified as a problem for communities throughout the state. As a result,
Florida Statutes are designed to control growth management policy or land use changes
that result in low density, single use development in the countryside that constitutes
sprawl.
The Transect
The existing characteristics, development patterns and context of the East Trail
correspond to a planning model known as the Rural-Urban Transect.
A transect, in its origins (Von Humboldt 1790), is a geographical cross-
seetion of a region used to reveal a sequence of environments. Originally,
it was used to anaZvze natural ecologies, sho",'ing vmying characteristics
through different zones sueh as shores. wetlands, plains. and uplands.
For human environments, sueh a cross-section can be used to identifY a
set of habitats that vmy by their level and intensity of urban character, a
continuum that ranges fmm !'liral to urban. /n Transect planning, this
range of cln'ironmcnts is the hasis .for organi:::hlg the components of
urbanism: building. lot. land lise. street, and all of the a/her physical
elements o(the human hahi/at.
- ."mlre:'. Duany, et al. S/liur/Code & Manual
(\Iiami: New Lrnan Publications, Inc. 2()()5).
The Rural-Urban Transect is a tool that helps us understand and govern the development
of communities. The Rural-Crban Transect defines the segments of a community from
its most intense "urban core" where the highest density and building heights exist, to the
moderately dense "urban center," the less dense "general urban" transect, the more
spacious "suburban" transect. the wooded and agricultural "rural" transect, and the
"natural" transect consisting of unaltered landscape. In The Lexicon of the New
Urbanism published by Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company, land use, building types, and
design standards are applied to each transect to establish human scale and sustainable
development patterns appropriate for the context of each area.
The East Trail currently incorporates a full range of urban to rural characteristics starting
at the County Government Complex at the Airp0l1 Road intersection, extending to
Collier-Seminole State Park at the County Road 92 intersection. Using the Rural-Urban
Transect typology as a guide to manage future growth along the corridor, the design of a
vision for tbe future of the East Trail takes shape.
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
12
Packet Page -58-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision/or the East Trail Corridor
In order to fulfill the orderly development pattern of the Rural-Urban Transect model, the
areas along the East Trail Corridor must be designated with appropriate Transects of
Urban Center, General Urban, Suburban, Rural and Natural. Urban Core is not
recommended for the East Trail corridor, because Urban Core would be typical of a city
center which does not correspond to any portion of the East Trail.
Centers
Along with the Transect designations and related development standards that would be
applied to accomplish appropriate scale and style of development relative to location
along the corridor, a system of centers or nodes can be designated as concentrations of
activity. The Growth Management Plan already applies the principle of centers in the
form of Activity Centers located at major road intersections. The Community Character
Plan for Collier County sought to advance the concept of centers to be more than
commercial nodes. The Character Plan suggests convenient centers should offer the
following: quality experiences; diversity of uses, including retail, workplaces, housing,
and community facilities; and building types that are durable and flexible to be functional
as markets change. The centers should be scaled consistent with the Transect model, so
that intensity and design of the center relates to the intensity and design of the
surrounding area. Centers put forth in the Character Plan that would be appropriate along
the East Trail corridor range in type and scale from town centers, neighborhood centers,
village centers, hamlets, and rural crossroads.
Mobilitv
The third planning principle that relates to the corridor characteristics and public
priorities is mobility planning. The concept of mobility has eclipsed traditional
transportation planning models that focused on the automobile as the only measure of
successful connection between two points. A mandate for new transportation planning
methods in Florida became law in 2008 (Laws of Florida Chapter 2008-191/ House Bill
697). Florida's local governments are now required to adopt policies that discourage
urban sprawl, establish energy efficient land use pattcrns, and develop transportation
strategies to address reduction in !,'feenhouse gas emissions from the transportation
sector. In the QualizvlLevel of Service Handbook the Florida Department of
Transportation has created level of services measures so that transit services, bicycling,
and walking may be counted in addition to the traditional measure of road capacity to
serve community mobility needs.
This emphasis on developing in ways that reduce vehicle miles traveled results in
planning for nodes that allow mobility alternatives. Rather than putting more automobile
trips on the road, it is important to allow oppOliunities for walking, biking and riding the
bus to access community facilities, workplaces, and shopping. Quarter-mile and half-
mile pedestrian sheds, pedestrian COilllectivity, and bus transit are important concepts to
guide future development and redevelopment of property along the East Trail corridor.
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
13
Packet Page -59-
4/12/2011 Item B.C.
Vision/or the East Trail Corridor
gk &a6t got<loif "O~ S~
To protect and enhance the quality of life for East Naples residents and business owners,
property along the East Trail shall be developed and redeveloped according to orderly
and enduring development patterns that concentrate community facilities and services in
locations that maximize residents' convenient access so that all needs can be met within
their own community, while protecting the scenic quality and natural resources of East
Naples.
The following goals and strategics are the result of community input and priorities for
how the East Trail should development in the future.
Goal 1. Establish a framework for orderly future development and redevelopment
that emulates the Rural-Urban Transect development pattern.
Strategies:
o Create a Vision Concept Plan as a graphic tool to show the desired
development patterns along the East Trail corridor.
o Establish land use and development standards that observe the range of
Urban to Rural characteristics along the East Trail and promote building
and site designs that provide quality environments.
o The Urban Center at the nOl1heastern portion of the conidor should be a
conccntration of shops, various residcntial unit typcs, offices, workplace,
civic buildings, and public space in thc forn1 of plazas and parks.
o General Urban areas in Segment] and Seb'ment 2 should be primarily low
to mcdium density rcsidential in nature but should provide opportunities
for mixed usc developments and live-work units, with quality landscaping
and public parks, squares and greens.
o The Suburban area in Segment 3 should primarily accommodate detached
single family home communities that appear landscapcd and b'l'een whcn
viewed from the road ("view shed dcvelopments"). Parks and b'l'eenways
arc also appropriate.
o The Rural arca in Segment 4 should primarily accommodate agriculture
and scattered buildings, in addition to vicwshed developments and a se1t:
sustaining planned rural village.
o The Natural arca is Collicr Seminole Statc Park at the southeastern
tern1inus of the conidor. which is to remain in its natural unaltered state
with thc exception of commercially designated land appropriate for a
corner store at the intersection of C.R. 92.
Goal 2. Establish centers that correspond to the Rural-Urban continuum to define
locations wherc the following components of a community converge: residential,
commercial, workplace, bus service, pedestrian paths, bike paths, and community
facilities.
Strategies:
o Establish land use and devclopment standards that encourage
concentration and mix of uses at ccnters with varying intensity based on
location and accessibility.
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
14
Packet Page -60-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision/or the East Trail Corridor
o Town Centers are desib'Ilated at the following locations:
. The Collier Countv Government Complex Town Center is a
location where all the components of community converge. The
complex is a bus transfer station and a major work center, with
connectivity to residential neighborhoods within a half mile radius.
The aging shopping centers of Walmart and Naples Town Center
are opportunities for redevelopment with more intense mixed use
settings to incorporate new restaurants and shops within the half
mile pedestrian shed.
. The Rattlesnake Hammock Road Town Center is a location where
residential, workplace, bus service, pedestrian paths, bike paths
and community facilities converge within the half-mile pedestrian
shed. The future development of Sabal Bay could result in a new
school and more commercial uses, including addition of a
significant workplace. The aging shopping center at the southeast
corner of Rattlesnake Hammock and the East Trail is an
opportunity for redevelopment with a more intense mix of uses.
. The Navaio Trail Town Center is a location where residential, bus
service, pedestrian paths, bike paths, schools, and a park exist, and
mixed use development is proposed on existing undeveloped and
underutilized sites.
o Neighborhood Centers are designated at the following locations:
. The Sugden Park Neighborhood Center is a location where the
park, residential neighborhoods, commercial uses, bus route, and
some pedestrian facilities convcrge to conveniently serve the
Lakewood and Avalon area residents. Due to the short lot depth of
existing commercial properties along the corridor, low scale mixed
use and the introduction of live-work units is proposed for the
eventual redevelopment of the existing commercial properties.
. The Saint Andrews Boulevard Ncighborhood Center is a location
where a commercial center, residential areas, pedestrian facilities,
the bus route, and the library converge to scrve Lely residents and
future residents of Treviso Bay. Mixcd use redevelopment and
infill dcvelopment of the existing commercial center is proposed to
fortify this location as a viable ccnter of neighborhood scale
services within walking and biking distance for the adjacent
neighborhoods.
. The 951 Neighborhood Center is a location where commercial
centers, residential communities, and the bus route converge. This
location did not achieve status as a Town Center due to its location
in the Suburban Transect and the limited number of community
scrvice components that are viable for this location. Eventual
redevelopment of the shopping centers is envisioned as low scale,
walkable, mixed use development that creates an identity for the
951 intersection that relates to the large adjacent neighborhoods of
J OOOS011 Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
15
Packet Page -61-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision/or the East Trail Corridor
Lely Resort, Eagle Creek, and the other smaller residential
neighborhoods in close proximity.
o Village Centers are designated in the following locations:
. The 6Ls Village Center is designated where the 6Ls Farm currently
exists. The Collier County Future Land Use Map designates this
large property as a receiving area eligible for development as a
rural village. Therefore, a Village Center is appropriate in this
location. The Village Center should serve the future rural village
as well as nearby residents with minimal commercial uses and
services needed for convenience.
o Hamlets are designated in the following locations:
. The Manatee School Hamlet is a location where community
facilities are concentrated at the transition between the Suburban
and Rural transects. This hamlet is characterized by the existing
community facilities of the schools and the church. The location
could be further developcd as a focal point for cOlmnunity based
activities, along with commercial uses to serve nearby residents.
o Rural Crossroads are designated at the following location:
. The C.R. 92 Rural Crossroads is designated for small scale
commercial uses such as a corner store due to its location in the
natural area of the Collier Seminole State Park.
Goal 3. Establish mobility strategies that facilitate pedestrian, bicycle, and bus
transit connections between established neighborhoods, new development and
redevelopment.
Stratcgies:
o Limit vehicle miles travel cd by concentrating development where bus,
pedestrian, and bicycle infrastructure exists or is planned.
o Allow mixed use development and live-work units along with reductions
in parking requirements as a mechanism to reduce vehicle miles travcled.
o Require connections between new and existing development. including
residential uses, commercial uses, and community facilities.
o lneorporatc new bus facilities in new developments.
o Promote complete strcet design for road improvement projects, so that
landscape treatments promoting pedestrian comfOli, as well as pathways,
bikeways and bus services, are critical components of the road design.
Goal 4. Promote economic development by planning for an appropriate mix of uses
and housing types to support viable new commercial, retail, restaurant, hotel, and
other services.
Strategies:
o Analyze market characteristics and trends to identify oppOliumtJes and
limitations that affect devclopment and location of desired uses along the
COITidoL
o Coordinate with the Economic Development Council to develop a strategy
to attract new desired businesses.
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
16
Packet Page -62-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Vision for the East Trail Corridor
o Promote land use regulations that limit incompatible land uses and are
responsive to newer trends in building and design to accommodate
innovative development types.
o IdentifY a "brand" for the East Trail corridor, and use it to promote the
East Trail through marketing initiatives to attract new residents, new
businesses and eco-tourism.
Jolmson Engineering, Inc.
April 2010
17
Packet Page -63-
f-
Z
w
:?:
lJ
w
Vl
fiJi>
J<.)j
Q-r)6'z,
"/J),~)
~
,':'
-'
D
",
..:):
.a;
~
::;
"
~.
"
,
6
~{
,
~ ~
." :;::-
o
~
"" ;
;- ~
~.~
1';."lllur
;:":,,\
\,,<:-
(S6~J
,1.
-~
~' ~
,
2:
f-
Z
w
:?:
lJ
w
Vl
~
~
~
::::v
~~
~
~ ,.
~ ~ I ,:.":..
~~ {/" : ,F'"
'~-...' '-'_'(1'1'
~
l!!I!It:.t'" I
~.., .
,,~'/':""::,"
'o'
..
,~'IIII:;
",r
_r
.,'
'o'
I, .~r'
/'
.1/
/~'
t
/
/
I
/
;::
.'"
/",.
/,,"0
/~Q;j
I".'
/
/
~.
,
~ li
~
"
il.
il
"
3
~
~
<
~
,
I
~
,
3
.
/
,<,v
,,""
,.
"
:1
8
~
<
?
-'
c'
,
~ ~ j.,<J.'
,~._~ if 'y,
";, ~ v ~
~ :: ~ ~,
i !
~.'...
I
.J
"
z
g
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
~~Ax
Packet Page -65-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
Sourco: Collier County ComprAh"m;ve Planning DepQrtnl",nt, Revised 6/08
L:ULF('I::
!liE\iL'('
\/<,
lV,l/:J~~~~~0~::. I, 4.
1.~!_t~j~!J ~,:...~ .:"
L'l.}:,C:..'-\.-\lL
\:> ' -"c,:r~-L
\,1 N t\\"~'$~CL;<l::1 S
t, "\Sm. - . , ' " ' ,
; ,~ ,,_,~~ ~!~~tE:t~ti;';~~.~:~b?#..:';~tj'
,-~"'
'L l
6
!-:cnnOlnil' !)C\l'!urIl1CI11 (\ltlflL'11 pJ'( 'pi I i;.'I" (',\1:111:
\\ \\ \\ ,L'\' .lpk:~J-l(1rlda.c\)rn
Packet Page -66-
PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
"E':
:':.:~:i: "'.'[i>,
". '.",',.,-
~;:}Y+:'i>;~"'~':~~'{V~
EASTTRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY
- -'":;'; T',_ "" '"'~"',"_.~ ',,,,' '>~ . "... 'J, 7 ' ,~ ~ w "1, ,_.~....tl,>I"'"
: "ir~\'ri;fm~~;M~~OA '$0;'2'009 e . .,rL .::,:.c. ..\i4'rn'n 1JL~. .i~.ili.L;;b1i:~;..J;'-:: ,;j:'I~'" ,
. :;,:, ,.',," ':l:-"h' ",.",:,,; \' I "!~J.:.~!?!;~~~"~A~.;I"~}~. "
:',:,:::l:~;~,':5;;:;~-
d' n:.
"'9:"
,..... .:' .:>',:..'
:'" . . ,~,.r,.
About this Study
The East Naples Foundation, Inc., the
philanthropic arm of the East Naples Civic
Association (ENCA), is seeking community
involvement to fund and complete a corridor study
of Tamiami Trail East (the "East Trail") from its
Airport Pulling Road intersection south to its
County Road 92 intersection. The study is expected
to define an identity for the East Trail corridor.
The ultimate I-esult of the study is a Corridor Plan
that indicates existing qualities to be protected,
target areas for development and redevelopment,
and an overall vision for the future.
Objective of this Study
The objective of this study is to anticipate,
plan, and identify adjustments to regulatory
framework so that the East Trail corridor
grows viably while protecting quality of life.
This study will ultimately result in a plan that
documents the current conditions of the East
Trail, identifies the vision for the future of the
corridor based on community input, and
outlines the goals, objectives and policies that
will guide future development.
Public Involvement
The public involvement component of this study is important. Property owners along the corridor, nearby
residents and business owners, and other stakeholders in the area, will have opportunities to participate in the
study process. Through newsletters and two public meetings, the East Naples Foundation seeks to include and
inform the community during the process. The first public workshop is scheduled for March 30, 2009 and the
second will be determined based on availability of funds to continue the study effort. To support or get more
information about the effort, please contact enaplesfnd@aol.com
EiMt .N apfetJ :JOlUulaiUm, JI/I:'.
4915 :Rattl.e6,ume Jlanuno.cfi:Rd. #214
Jt' apfetJ, :Je 34113
eAST TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY
FIRST PUBUCWORKSHOP
MARCH 30,2.009
5~O pm t.o l~OO pm
AT
St Peter The Apostle Catholic: Church
5130 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd.
Naples. ill 341 13
Packet Page -67-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
ast ral aster an tu '"
SEGMENT WORKGROUP RESULTS ~.~.~.~
AESTHETICS
Lands~..aplng and Oper. Space .
Architectural Design . .
Rural Character .
Cleanlirless .
CONNECTIVITY
Existing Pathway I I I I .
~ SERVICES
0 QUick Response Time I . I I I
'"
0- Proximity to PDints ofl'lteresl r . I I . I
DEVEl..OPMENT
Cluanl!ty ofCommerclai Space . I
New'1of'1es . ,
"Jew Developmenl I .
Density . ,-
OTHER
Na(ural Resources I I I . I
AESTHETICS
Seas of Park,ng . I
clnsig'1!ty Utilities . ,
Unslgh\I,' 6uli('hr.gs . I
GuardrailS . !
Homeless & Day Laborers I . !
Lilter I I .
CONNECTIVITY
LI"l,ted Conne::tl:>n be1weel1 De5tinatl~Jrls .
~ Dangerous Roadways (TClmlanesIAccess! . .
Z
0 Segmen'eo Sidewalks I .
f.) DEVEL.OPMENT
'.Jnsigh(lj' D(>ve'Cl~-nenl(~awn Tattoo) I . I .
~edeve,:;p''1en: Obsta::les I . I
L'ml\ed CcmmerClallClt Depth I I .
51'1:) Malls . .
V,,:::an: ELls'ness . I I .
Lo'"" 1r:;;='~E HOJSlng I . I .
High !m;.Ja,:;: ::ees . I I
OTHER
Per:::eived:r.me & Safety I . I . I I
AESTHETICS
In:::reas",:L,mdsC<lpe .
Increased:!per,Spa:::e . ,
IncreasC'08uffer . .
DeSign ReView / Review Commitlee . ,
,
Upjale Jnsigh:IY Building "a:::adl"S . , I
COnlrol Llgm "'ollution I . , I
:
CONNECTIVITY
IITlfjr:;'ie/Provlje B;kelRedestrian . . I . .
C()~r\e:;tions
RECREATION
Inc'ease: ParkS & Open Space I . . I I
'" SERVICES
..J I . I . I I
<( IncreaSeG,';c:E'S, w Civic Uses
0 DEVELOPMENT
c;) Increased Density . . I
Inc:reaser1Rf>LgiIIUpSC<llej . . I
Ina-easedHotels . .
increasej SDtique Shops .
Increased Resturan:s I .
Lot pssemblylor Larger Relail I' .
Busif'ess Park I . .
OTHER
EnVlconlT'enlal Sensitivity .
Ecotour:sm . .
Meeting Places/Convention .
Center/Amphitheater i
&Cl<J! 0~k eJOW.J4/i.on., 3m:.
E T'I M PI S d
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
H'\2003000C''20087796-000 - East Naples FoundatiCln Inc (,,,,miami Trail E, StrategIC Planning)\PUBLlC INPUT MEETING DOCUMENTS\East Naples Trail~Survey Analysis,xls
Packet Page -68-
t;ad g~ eJoun.Jdian, 3nc.
East Trail Master Plan Study
Public Input Meeting 3/30/09
Individual Questionnaire Responses
What do you think the East Trail
should develop f change over the
next 20 years?
I AESTHETICS. 14
13 AppOllflll1ce
Updaleold Business Fronts
Clean-up
What do you like along the Trail
and want to keep the same?
I AESTHETICS .17
12 Landscaping I Parka I Natural Areas
2 EnlrySignaga
2 Ughl;ng
1 Old FklrldaCharaCler
I CONNECTMTY.1i
3 Sidewalk I Bike Lana I MultH'SflTroil
1 ConnactivitylotheLlbrary
1 Traffic
I
, Golf Course
RECREATION. 1
I
3 libraI)'
1 Schools
SERVICES."
I DEVELOPMENT. 13
7 ExistinoAusnlessIls
8eol15
Eurasia Restaurant
French Bakary
McConnell"sHardware
H~.
Mov,aThaaler
6 ResidenlialDaveloP'mmt
LelyRasorf
TravisoBay
I OTHER.2
1 Population diversity
1 LowPopulation
PrmatlynyPoroonlaga
DEVELOPMENT
"
"
"
58 46%
AESTHETICS
"
"
,
34 27%
CONNECTIVITY
;
,
,
16 13%
OTHER
6%
SERVICES
,
,
,
7 6%
RECREATION
,
,
C
3 2%
Bus Station
Architectural Continuity i Trans'iion Zone Betwaen Segments
Landscaping
Establish a Dasign Raview Commrttee
AlIUtlIiliasUndarg'ound
1 LiphtinpOrd,nance
I CONNECTIVITY. 7
4lmprovaT,aff<cPattems
Impmve951&411n1s'Bectlons
Traffclights
ReCluc.eFsalingotTraflkCongeslion
2 Mo'a Sidewalk Conneclivrty i Recreation i Multi-usa lrails
1 Furll::tionailnlrastructure
I RECREATION - 2
2 Environmental Enhancamanls
I SERVICES-2
2 Artist Canteri Limarv
I DEVELOPMENT. J1
22 Business DevaloDment
Markatinga"aOashnat,on
MOfaRaslaurants
EnaouragsUp"c:alaDavalopmanl
Reslaurants Oocal and chains)
Indoor i Ouldoot Dining
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
What is your biggest concern about
the East Trail?
I AESTHETICS. J
3 Parcepbonand Appeatance
LossofCha,acter
Lack otMaintenanca afl<l Rainveslment
I CONNECTlVITY-4
2T,affocSafaty
2 Soletyfor BicyclislondPe<teslrions
1.{<":;:/)\.;:)0'/.",</ .RECREATION -.0
I SERVICES. 1
1 LostSeovices
I DEVELOPMENT. 14
6 Blight and Vacant StoraFronls
3 Low Income Housiog
2 BalancadGrowlhiUncontrolledGrowlh
1 AbundBnce 01 Sloraga units
1 Oeoelopmant of Strip Malls
1 MobilaHomas
I OTHER-2
2 Crime
DDEVELOPMENT
46%
DCONNECTIVITY
13%
27%
Packet Page -69-
o DEVELOPMENT I
IlAESTHETICS i
,
DCONNECTIVITY I
DOTHER ~
.SERVICES
o RECREATION
Johnson Engineering, Inc.
H:\200eOO00\20GB7796--000 East Napla"- Foundahon Inc, (Tamiami Trail E, Strategic PlallningjlPU6L1C INPUT MEETING OOCUMENTS\East Naples Trail_Su'vey Analysis.xls
Retail
Hotel
Prohibit Pawn and Adult Entertainment Stores
Mixed-usa Developmant
Commercial Node" (rathe'lhan strip molls & s\orage units)
3 Raductionot Slnp Malls
3 LimilLowlnoomaHou",,,g
1 Park'oginthaRllar01 Davelopmenls
1 Acoommodala Rural Viliage Development
1 Limn Rasidantial Un~s aecomin~ Ralail
I OTHER.4
2 LongerOparat,ng Hours lor Business
1 CnmaControliPrevenlion
1 COllhnLJEtthaCurrenlPlan
CORRIDOR PRIORITIES
Responses from Individual Questionnaires
.SERVICES 0 RECREAl'lON
6% 2%
o OTHER
60.
4/12/2011 Item G.C.
EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY
March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting
St. Peter the Apostle Catholic Church
Sign In Sheet
ADDRESS EMAIL
2d <:;t{~~S ,C;; J~ \)'(5k~e~La'M
{>\[~l' [u_<,., c,........" \,IR"":^f fYl',e'-."",\bJs, e.coll;'/jD',,,,<,,,,-
1'/h3 ~~=f~'
2 _~; (, 15", ,
3 j, tJ-n-rv.-J ) d
4 Of--{ 121:<) T; (llR..L'D
- f
cl.tonfVh~. f!'~. ~
f) (}' ,
C;PSARLO@ ~H'Ir\D
rf/'\.j lie",-/'-' p a f lurlf.'!.o "t
q ~ D .f3or Jlle... $i:A.d I2d
, lJe OJI-'f:J ,(,S ,--;'J 13</
. /
5 2or~c:.-N 4bf-IIfN71 101-0 /lvfi~t4-t Gr4"-' .L1114-
----
6..;)E1J(V(l~E ---r.4Nlli02. c2. ~r7 B,t-I( /)1E7TOiJLI./S r:J1i.. LELL/GIVIC.'//-SSN gj) A<9t... (CFU-z
7 .fj1~"/}t&'lf ~:l5~:V ;JAt
I I
8 ~~ :P7_~ ' ~/ M Ct':{ I( (9 31 e:;lm::.('(~
1/;' .~ I '3 &> ~C( !-ki-lA{i-M/r.~
9 17!\1'i---:J..f1!?JI- L/;<Sr0/ (VL.A./d C' ''i-'-:("-~;' ( 1.)[::: b _ f 5 5 r:::-n./L1'.f,c,I@:,!i~~o
3G \l\ j-t qU,,-,~,,,-, . COv..'"
10 ~y-J/\ Ij"..JJ :t S).z..lrVv-<.. L--~ ~e.Y'(:L t-:sx..v ,"---OJ\.. ~J~-C(}r.
so. S, \""l"'-v ~ cl ~(No... 3~ , Co> \1.....
'5~ [\00 l,,~t~ ll'J -{G2D'1 '€.Shld)l~eU;ie"'e"'~-W'\
41fS- hdc&n Q..Jc PKw( .. .
#-L i/VofbSiFC 3l(l/b );a/07./-hr(71mgn:1iI.ho'(;~
.-;/;3-1""-/ J3e6C#<:d<:O<fJfl Lr'1-f0
.1/7/'*"'-. 34/12.-- ~':t"'''l'.P~Q~'N.:r
"
11 6,-[. ')),..v"1' t.\L.l.vw
12 KCrt:n HOr/'YIO(7
1~ ;5PEPtZ.6J?
I
Packet Page -70-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY
March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting
NAME
ADDRESS
ftJc:Jt-.f'4M ,E'AI.t1t?,4/.I tJ;~
A0z ,.fl.€' J :3 /~'!f
Iv I'I...~ .> "7' //y
.!J '3 ,,1 cP 11' /hU 11f!.u p:::. A vr-
EMAIL
15 14 L;;o C /! 1<- r,ef?
LAtdEAJ4$ e-'
/4j/Q/,.{o/Pj
/f,c /1/ZT;E:.JZ.. 3..!1 a 4oL-, ,~
14 ;l/;CMt':t ,/J /~&4?f/
16CI-III!<..LIU C(!)r<.II<(~f(r
L.-J 51<1/ /1-
-/ 2-{,. G-L,40cs J)/.. I/o
>/1'2. C-fT FI n.LftJ fIo L. . (.0 A1
17 S\J.-Wc.v-'V~~ r:;Jd'tO ~IJ~~.<n W1',.QI.,,3lilf2.
16a;rJt~ :; J~~ ~~-r::i U "- INl',<1ZEe€ <tblt~
19 ';t /t- f3DJ htf"" 1.:5&~ J p..- f2 C ~.~ -. 6'h1 ,,~s. nv1
20qjtIJ gvt-t/t'o-07- $l6J8 *,;r1>~JYl.i-irle, #/J; 3<1//.;1. ck~;;~~:~1?-(I"V"l
-?1 :SU'SaV\ Go 'de\,\ ~<\l.zl.\ c..\'I~V ~ ~\:iQI-1~~S,@ to.'lAefu:,1;. \'\J
229JU//1/- r;(~ !JG.-j 4t~ fY..-&( fr I () LISNG€OR.CE S(,6,f;>EI1((TIIWNt.lX.;:r
r-' <'y>l .e... S '-t It Ii
23 L",.,.....,...,( M v t-+-er 11~(g ~,'o~ fa.- LP-.~e...
24 ,It,! is G"-.(7
.:J2f7~ Wvy
;2. ~@~1,,..J-
25
26
27
28
29
Page 2
Packet Page -71-
4/12/2011 Item 6.C.
EASTTAMJAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY
March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting
St. Peter the Apostle Catholic Church
Sign In Sheet
ADDRESS EMAIL
G \l.\~S ~f\\-\r\ov ~*~d-. ~'('Y@~
1 ~a:I"\V~ 'l~'N '0~(a5~~'DG( \~\..~.c D'iV\.
A 46 (7::, Q,UG I(~L( C'/. C\'!J{).,Pc..q @ AcJC ~
2 (A/J IJJ, TlSVW-fY! U4(?L'lf R 5lf/n
, ) ]) I, o~ 3 DO 3; TA-i"'-i ~ 'l'fL
3 \ A..{}i?-e..LE- n U cl" r. 3 '..h O~
4 S t~ ~;;c Ie L( 11 ;CI L.'len? I3J ()rJ t..J
5 t:Ju1.t~A_
,
: ~ ~~t:o~~ 1\"," 4" UJ"F",~I' I\'i~"k
NAME
8 1~1 {t{,{ r -{'-en '/30" n f' S "
9 1L;;(3 ~I.s L l (L
105 &fr l(;vcA>t'1..1rb
11
12
13
6375 h/-j ISC. d fJd
'7-3'lO'f;?crvJ<v'1 L'l 5'/17.0
\J Y \\L& Co,-ue-(.. et-l'l?U' ~li"c--S..
<....:v-..
a//4../(./UJifkrCiJlT/P,kv!' .. I~
N (i 'rr/6 I /(hf1f'!1 ~ Enhltf(!h,'l. to"l
y
C~;(J<; ) >'307(! 0---~.Vr..."""";/.
p "'"
bonne.s.s(;;;hntc",Ilhp. ne't
t.li.J?--j IJ\j'<.:L"Jf<;J (!(..upj)~ 173L(.J({rtI!}'.N/leL~>L/~I'h~l.(",
dt/ tjL: "
lrc?J t,,9'1/ /lJ!; J -f;e! MV -]t;(I1'J,4(;Jjo,;iw-! U/}
Packet Page -72-