CAC Subcommittee Minutes 09/22/2004
September 22, 2004
TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER
COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY SUB-COMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, September 22, 2004
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Coastal Advisory
Sub-Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 1 :00 PM in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F
of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following
members present:
CHAIRMAN: Ron Pennington
John Arceri
Tony Pires
ALSO PRESENT: Ron Hovell, Utility Engineering Dept.
Maria Bernal, Tourism
Maura Krause, Parks & Recreation
Bill Lorenz, Environmental Services Director
Jack Wert, Tourism Director
Naples Daily News
1
September 22, 2004
CAC SUB-COMMITTEE
Mr. Pennington called the meeting of the Sub-Committee to order at 1 :05 PM
A quorum was established with the committee Mr. Pennington appointed consisting
of Mr. Arceri, Mr. Pires and himself in attendance.
· He explained he had brought to the County Manager's attention a lack of
management coverage from the County Staff for the Coastal Management; the
beaches, inlets etc. Mr. Mudd asked if the Coastal Advisory Committee would
provide a recommendation to the County Commissioners, consequently the
appointment of the sub-committee.
· Mr. Pennington handed out a letter he drafted to Donna Fiala, Chairman Collier
County Commission. (attached) He sent a copy to Mr. Mudd, County Manager
and received a response that said "Ron, you hit the name on the head - good to
go."
· Questions were asked what the County Manager's concerns, problems or
examples of problems they are trying to solve. Mr. Pennington responded they
had the item concerning Wiggins Pass concerning the dredging of Wiggins Pass.
They found there wasn't anyone available or in charge to make a decision on
dredging it or not. There is no one in the County directly responsible for the
Counties greatest natural resources. Mr. Pennington went through the different
departments and staff and found there is no "one" department or staff person
responsible for these responsibilities.
· It was noted Parks and Recreation initiated and sponsored the project. But passes
do not fall within their purview.
· It was also noted the Coastal Advisory Committee can only recommend and they
have limitations. They have no authority to carry out governmental
responsibilities. They do not provide oversight to all the beaches. Again many of
the departments and Advisory Boards were mentioned and what responsibilities
each one has. None were responsible for the beaches and inlets. In the mid-80's
there were three marine biologists PhD's in charge of what they are referring to
today. Mr. Pennington said it has fallen apart since then.
· Mr. Pires felt they are to talk not only about comprehensive management but
planning also. Would require re-allocation of funding as the 2004/05 budget is in
progress, or a need for a budget amendment for implementation. He felt
"planning" should be an important element.
2
September 22, 2004
· Mr. Pennington mentioned the County Manager is trying to keep staff at a
minimum. Discussion followed on staffing and how it can all be integrated.
· Mr. Arceri's opinion is that the way it is organized right now - the past beach
management is fragmented and decentralized. One group may be responsible for
one aspect, they do other things rather than beaches and one group works on other
aspects of the beaches. It should be centralized for maximum control with a
beach person in charge and people that work only on beaches and passes and not
split their responsibilities in other areas. We need strong centralized
management control and to be focused on the beaches, passes and inlets etc.
· Bill Lorenz - Environmental Services Director - gave some factual
information about the organizational structure and history. Within Environmental
Services they were the old Natural Resources Dept. and then combined with the
Environmental Review section of the permitting section of Community
Development. Their functions within that division, of which Joe Schmitt is
Administrator, conducts sea turtle monitoring along with a number of other
sections. There is no other person that is has that responsibility of managing or
controlling Coastal projects. He talked about the off shore, near shore (beach
renourishment), raking functions of beaches, restoration, pass management,
waterways management, listed species protection and monitoring. Different
expertise is needed for these different functions.
He mentioned the biologist in the 80's were under contract - not employees.
His department is responsible for the permitting review and land use projects
through the Growth Management and Land Development code.
He is not prepared to give a position for Coastal Management.
They all felt Jim Mudd; County Manager is looking for integration at a lower
level then himself for Coastal Management.
· Mr. Hovell felt it wasn't so much the organization as the funding source. The two
FTE's in the Public Utilities Divisions related to the Coastal Zone and are 100%
funded with Tourist Taxes. By State Statute they are precluded from doing activities
that others might expect them to do. He asked how they would pay for things that are
not established policy.
· Mr. Pennington did not feel they should get into the organizational aspect. Who
takes over the management of the dredging of the passes etc., should not originate
from them. Planning is very important with looking at the overall picture. Mr.
Pennington gave an overview of what Dr. Staiger's position is with the City of Naples
and dealing with storm water management, developing policies, management plans
and budgets with the beaches. There should be staff people overlooking the whole
concept and looking at the conditions of the beaches and inlets.
· Mr. Pires pointed out the Board has their budget done for 2004/05 and has their
budget philosophies and principals. They will start early next year for discussions on
3
September 22,2004
the next budget. Need to focus and have a consultation with the County Manager.
Maybe they need a particular group focused and centralized on this issue of Coastal
Management.
· Mr. Arceri agreed with Mr. Pires. If there isn't a rush right now, they need to help
Jim Mudd sell it to the County Commissioners. Need more detail on the problems.
What are other counties doing? Write more specificity of what the problem is.
· Need to know: Facts/Problems/and Examples. Commissioner Henning will want to
know the facts. There is no centralized manager in charge.
· Ron Hovell mentioned they would be surprised to find out how many things never
make it to the Committee when they get inquiries from the public. It is a bigger
policy issue than what they may think. To his knowledge, there is no commitment on
the part of the Board, consequently no staff to manage navigation channels etc. No
funding commitment - so no staff. We recognize you have identified a problem, and
in order to fix it, will have to petition the Board and establish a Special Taxing
District. Without money there is no solution.
· Mr. Pennington agreed with Mr. Hovell. Mr. Arceri stated they don't need a
Special Taxing District to take care of the navigational problems in the County. He
said there is no one to fight for funds, so it never gets presented. No one is fighting
because no one is in charge. Discussion followed on getting policy approved, needs
for the funds and selling the program.
· Bill Lorenz mentioned things that are not getting done. Need to identify them and
then the manager needs to determine how best to get them done. Need someone
responsible for creating a vision for the Coastal zone. The problems, needs,
alternative solutions and opportunities. There is no entity to identify them. Ron will
evaluate projections for revenue structure from TDC - but not for the whole Coastal
zone as to what needs to be done. Funding source to him is secondary. More details
need to be discussed - creating vision is what is lacking.
· Need more specificity - need to identify specifics - why is change necessary-
shorebird and sea grass monitoring was discussed - no vision or advocate - they
don't want to make organizational changes - County needs to be interested in beach
and navigational issues. Tourist Tax will enable them to pay for more of the beach
renourishment etc. Discussed past problems with Tourist Tax. Mr. Pennington noted
Commissioner Henning thinks certain things should be done but not out of Tourist
Tax funds.
BREAK - 2:21 PM
RECONVENED - 2:29 PM
4
September 22, 2004
· Mr. Arceri said they should let the Commissioners know what they, as a
committee, see as things that need to be done - that may not be getting done right
now and leave "how" to solve the problem to the County Manager. The
following changes to the draft letter and 4 points the Sub-Committee noted are as
follows:
2nd Paragraph - however a void exists for comprehensive management and planning of
our beaches and inlets, for example, the committee feels the following are not adequately
being addressed:
· There is no overall Comprehensive Strategic Coastal Plan for our beaches, passes
and waterways and that most work is done based on specific projects.
· No detailed overall comprehensive data driven, monitoring, assessment or
surveillance of our coastal areas except as it may pertain to a specific project.
· There is no detailed Comprehensive Coastal Zone Management Plan (shorebirds,
sea grass, turtles) and again, work in these areas is only associated with approved
projects.
· There is a need for stronger advocacy for Coastal funding for both TDC and other
County funds for critical Coastal needs.
Discussion followed on sales tax, creating a taxing district and TDC funding and other
various projects.
Mr. Pennington will finalize the letter as an Agenda item for the next
meeting........ ...other members can change or add things they feel should be in the letter.
Mr. Wert - Tourism Director - stated the members made good progress and informed
the Committee members of some changes.
Mr. Hovell is moving to the Facilities Division -working with
buildings and structures.
Will hire a full time Coastal Manager which will be funded 100%
out of#195 Tourist Tax Fund.
Maria Bernal is now hired as a full-time employee as of October
1st.
Will move Al Madsen, who is their Beach Inspector, and is also
paid out of#195.
Those three positions will come under Tourism Dept.
5
-""'--
September 22, 2004
He mentioned from Management it will help. There are so many places Tourist Tax
funds are being spent that he has no supervision over. He needs to know what is
happening. If the new position gets established, it will work out well with someone
overseeing new projects and the lines of authority will be well defined.
Mr. Hovell mentioned Al Madsen was recognized as the Employee of the Month for
Collier County and happy to have him and does a great job on the Beaches.
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting adjourned
by order of the Chair at 2:59 PM.
Collier County Coastal Advisory Sub-Committee
Ron Pennington, Chairman
6
____._.._._____~.._".,._._,.__.___._ft"_"__.~'_,.__._