BCC Minutes 09/15/1981 R
Naples, Florida, September 15, 1981
~¡ LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners In
#.
tand for the County of Collier, and also acting as the governing
t.
'poard(s) of such special districts as have been created according to
l.~ and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:03 A.M.
In Regular Session in Building "F" of the Courthouse Complex with the
following members present:
CHAIRMAN:
VICE CHAIRMAN:
John A. pistor
Cl if ford Wenzel
C.R. "Russ" Wimer
Mary-Frances Kruse
David C. Brown
^LSO PRESENT, William J. Reagan, Clerk, Harold L. Hall, Chief
Deputy Clerk/Fiscal Officer, Darlene Davidson and Elinor Skinner (1:45
P.M.) Deputy Clerks, Donald Pickworth, County Attorney, Irving Berzon,
Utilities Manager; C. William Norman, County Manager; Neil Dorrill,
Admini.trative ^.aiatant Torry Virtð, Community Development
Administrator; Terry Clark and Lee Layne, Planners; Jeffory Perry,
Zoning Director; Clifford Barksdale, Public Works Administrator: Grace
Spaulding, Administrative Aide to the Board: and, Raymond Barnett,
Deputy Chief, Sheriff's Department.
I
P89. 1
,
.OOK 063 PACE 561
.. "
t .
,
\'T
I Ji~ ;~~ v~ --:-::::.' ~1 ~=-;,~'~-T
-,
..._,.... '
-....--......--... ~.-
. ¡
"
September 15, 1981
AGENDA - APPROVED WITH ADDITIONS
Commissionor Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
carried unanimously, that the agenda be approved with the following
aðcHtions r
1. Two proclamations re Collier County Employees' Annual
Golf Tournament awards for "Hole in one" shots - added.
2. Resolution re defending present and former County
Officials in lawsuits - added to County Attorney's
Report.
3. Selection of Environmental Consultant - added to ace
Report.
4. Appointmont of Immokalee Planning Board - added to BCC
Repor t.
MINUTES OF AUGUST 18, 1981 - APPROVED AS PRESENTED
Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by CommJssioner Brown and
carried unanimously, that the minutes of August 18, 1981, be approved
8. presented.
PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING SEPTEMBER 21-27 AS LAND SURVEYOR'S WEEK _
ADOPTED
Having been duly ðdopt~d, the proclamation designating the week of
September 21-27, 1981 as Land Surveyor's Week was presented to Messrs.
Evers and Doggs, representing the Florida Society of Professional Land
Surveyors, by Chairman Pistor.
,
I
I
I
I
¡.
I
!
,
MOK 063 rACE 565
PAge 2
.
':i'
, ":,' '1~;"r' ;!f.... ~,,..,.~';>..'f...,.-' ';'¡,f,-i'"
",'01'(
~
,
,
I
j
I
!
.,
¡
.:.
¡ .
¡
;
(
I
September 15, 1981
PROCLAMATIONS DESIGNATING EMPLOYEES DONNA PERKINS AND TERRY eLARK AS
-HOLE IN ONE- STARS RE eOUNTY EMPLOYEE GOLF TOURNAMENT - PRESENTED
Having been ðuly executed by the Chairman, proclamations were
presented to County Employees Donna Perkins and Terry elark, having
been named as the lady and gentleman "hole in one- stars of the Collier
eounty Annual Employee Golf Tournament.
BOOK 063 PACE 5S7
'19- 3
.
.,._-"-_........,.."'-~,--,_._-".....,"'__,¡."'""""'.__""'"... ,". . '<I
"
\:
'.
I
¡ I
/
I
¡
I i
60~K 063 fACE 570
Septcmbor 15, 1981
ORDINANCE NO. 81-49, RE PETITION IZ-81-8-1, COMMUNITï DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION, AMENDING THE "I-MF-2" DISTRICT BY REDUCING THE SIDE YARD
REQUIREMENTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCr.S TO 7.5 FT. - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
August 14, 1981, and in the Immokalee Bulletin on August 20, 1981, as
evidenced by Affidavits of Publication filed with the Clerk, pUblic
hearing was opened to consider petition IZ-81-8-1, filed by the
eommunity Development Division, requesting an amendment to Ordinance
74-15, ("MF-2" District) by reducing the side yard requirements for
single family residences to 7.5 ft.
I'
!
,
Zoning Director Jeffory Perry recapped the information within the
Executive Summary dated 7/31/81, regarding petition IZ-81-8-1,
including the recommendation for approval from the Immokalee Area
Planning Commission, having reviewed thi~ petition on July 27, 1981.
C~mmunity Development Administrator Terry Virta stated that the
subject District is made up of lots that are 40 ft. and SO ft. wide.
He added that this is the only district in the County with a side yard
setback requirement of 10 ft. rather than 7.5 ft. for sißgle family
residences.
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and
carried unanimously, that th~ public hearing be closed.
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse ~~d
carried unanimously, that the Ordinance as numbered and entitled below
be adopted and entered into Ordinance Book No. 13.
ORDINANCE NO. 81-49
AN ORDINANCE ^MENDING ORDINANCE 74-15, ARTICLE
XI, SECTION 11.7, I-MF-2, ONE, TWO & MULTIPLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ALLOWING REDUCED
SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY
RES IDENCES
Page 4
. .~, .--^
,"
.
.
tm]
œI!J
id·,?<~
I
,
"""~--'_'_""'__"""''''__''''''_'_''''_''''''''''_'_''''''___.
:Mì."h,,· ..';'...... ~ ..... -- ~', >.... "."..:
, I
;
September 15, 1981
ORDINANCE NO. 81-50, RE PETITION NZ-81-5C, eORAL RIDGE-eOLLIER
PROPERTIES, AMENDING THE PELICAN BAY PUD RE SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIREMENTS
FOR COMMERCIAL AREAS - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
August 26, 1981, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the elerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition NZ-8l-5e,
filed by Coral Ridge-Collier Properties, requesting an amendment to the
Pelican Bay PUD by deleting the leasable square footage requirement for
the commercial areas.
Planner Lee Layne rep~rted that the CAPC held their public hearing
on September 3, 1981 and that, at that time, it was pointed out that
the subject petition would not represent additional commercial areas or
uses to the Pelican Bay PUD, rather, setbacks, landscaping, parking and
height would determine the limitations of buildable commercial area.
Ms. Layne stated that the CAPC and the staff are recommending approval
of Petition NZ-81-SC.
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by CommiRsioner Wenzel and
carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed.
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and
carried unanimouß1y, that the ordinance as numbered and entitled below
be adopted and entered into Ordinance Book No. 13.
ORDINANCE NO. 81-50
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 77-18, THE
PELICAN BAY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT,
BY DELETING SECTIONS 9.15 AND 10.13, AND BY
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
eoOK 063 PACE 571'
'a9- 5
.
-,..<."'-"'"-,."""-,~,_."-~""~..,""'..,.,,,...,,_....._----,--".~ ."
BOO;(
083 PACE 572
September 15, 1981
BOARD AeTION OF JULY 21, 1981 RE DENIAL OF PETITION BD-8l-s-e, ·WIGGINS
PASS BOAT DOCK EXTENSION - RESCINDED; RESOLUTION 8l-203 RE PETITION
BD-81-SC, APPROVING BOAT DOCK EXTENSION UP TO 102 FT. FOR WIGGINS PASS
YAeHT eLUB, INC., SECTION 17, T48S, R25E - ADOPTED, SUBJECT TO
STIPUL^TIONS
Planner Lee Layne stated that Petition BD-81-S-e was requested to
be reconsidered by the Board of County Commissioners, having been
denied by the Board on July 21, 1981.
Regarding the CAPC's review on June 4, 1981, of th~ subject
petition during public hearing, Ms. Layne said that, based on the
requirements of the relev~nt Ordinance, the CAPC forwardod the petition
with a recommendation for approval. She said that Petition ÐC-81-S-C
i8 a request for an extensior. to 102 ft. for a "T" boat dock, an~
referred to a set of plans origin~11y submitted by the petitioner as
well ~s a map of the area and sne outlined the location of the proposed
boat dock.
Mike Stephen, of Coastal Engineering Consultants, representing the
petitioner, Wi9gins Pass Yacht Club, Inc, and Attornoy Tom Brown, also
representing the petitioner were present. Mr. Stephen reviewed the
events that h~ve led up to this hearing, stating that his firm
originally submitted a petition to construct the entire project,
including docks, maintenance dredgIng, and riprap of the shoreline. He
said that the project has gone through a comprehensIve environmental
review, including the preparation and County approval of an EIS; that
the project was approved by the DNR and the State Department of
Community Affairs, which gave it an exemption from DRI status that the
the DER and the Corps of Engineers both gðve substantial approval lor
the entire plan, adding that they thought it would have a positive arod
beneficial effect on the area, including mangrove planting_, main-
tenance dredging, and the opening up of canals to improve circulation
end increase oxygen in the Wðter column and improve flushinq for the
PIge 6
Ie ~:,' :._:~,
--
œ.!!
iiiI
¡
¡
" I'
. ~,-.
.
.
-"<,,",~><,,"'''''-~'''''''''''''''''''''''-''''~"--''""'''''';'~''--'-'~'".'_--;-'""-;"'.._~~_.-
I
.
SeptembQr lS, 1981
area, and, that the latter was a determination based on the entire
project including the doc~s! ..Mt. StJ!p'I)~n.-.ê.t.ate.d_tha~t..tI..J.....J2t:.lLAnd_the
eorps required the petitioner to implement a sewage pump-out facility,
which is located on the T-dock that is in question at the present time
and is located entirely within the confines of the owner's bottomland.
He said that there is good and adequate depth and that all of the
requirements of the Ordinance have been met, including the question of
hazards to the navigation. He said that the extension of the dock is
located beyond the limits (.f the seawall in order to provide an easy
traffic flow pattern for boats coming up to the dock to' use the
pump-out facility. He concluded his statement by saying that the total
numbor of docks is less than one half the number of units that are
available on the project site.
Attorney Brown stated that this request falls under Section 8 of
the Collier County Zoning Ordinance, which has five standards upon
which a determination as to whether or not to grant this type of permit
is made, adding that the staff and the CAPC have reviewed the request
according to these five standards and found that it meets the required
criteria. He said that both bodies have subsequently recommended
approval of the 8ubj~ct petition for the dock extension.
Mr. Brown
noted that the courts have traditionally held that, if there ia a
standard and the petition meets that standard, then, the governing body
. .
1. required to grant the petition. He said that he has not found any
factors that are contrary to the factors found by the CAPC and the
staff related to the subject petition meeting the criteria within the
official minutes of the BCC meeting during which the .ubject petition
va. denied. ft. sai~ that, based on the.e facta, he believe. that the
petition .hould be approved. He referred to the apparent confusion
over the naYlg~bl1ity of Wi99in. Pas. that concerned the &r.c in the
tOOK 063 rACE 573
"'9· ,
,.
.--..... .
.
....
.'
. .
.. -..... .'~
aOOK 053 PACE 574
Scptcmbp.f 15, 1981
past and noted that the developers have agreed to include, within their
condominium document, which must be disclosed to prospective buyers a
statement which indicates that there is no guarantee that Wiggins Pass
will be navigatable and that neither they (the develop~r), nor the
County, would be responsible for providing that navigability in the
future. He referred to ð letter dated September 14, 19B1, which is
signed by the Executive Vice President of the Corporation, noting that
its contents have been approved by the County Attorney, explained that
it addresses the aforementioned stipulation. Chairman pistor asked it
the Board can have assurance that, as soon as this information is
included in the documentation that will be distributed to prospective
buyers, that the County can have a copy of that literature for the
file. Mr. Brown agreed to submit this information to the County, as
well as a copy of tho aforemontioned letter.
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and
carried 4/1, with Commissioner Wenzel op~sed, that the Board action of
July 21, 1981, whereby Petition BD-81-5C was denied, be rescinded.
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and
carried 4/1, with Commissioner Wenzel opposed, that Re~olution 81-203,
granting Pet~tion SD-BI-SCt subject to the inclusion of the information
within the aforementioi:ed letter re non-guaranteed navigatibllity ot
Wiggins Pass within the above-refere~~ed documentation and copies of
same being submitted to the County, and approving the extension of the
boat dock to 102 ft. as requested by Wiggins Pass Yacht Club, Inc, be
adopted.
Pa9 e 8
~...'
.............,
~
~\I
EamJ
·-"·:~t ~.-.._ ..~.":...~:
,~
September 15, 1901
~RCHITECTURAL PROGRAM RE COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT EXPANSION PROGRAM,
PROJECT BUDGET, AND, seHEDULE OF CRITIeAL D^TES - APPROVED
~dministrative Assistant Neil Dorrill explained that today's
report is the culmination of a process that has taken several months in
regards to the expansion of the Collier County Government Center. He
said that this process has been related to the construction management
firm of Polizzi/Heery and the review of the BCC and their staff. ~lso,
contributing to this effort has been the ad hoc Citizens Committee for
Space Planning and Action. Mr. Dorrill stated that, pursuant to the
work of these bodies, and the resultant presentation by the ad hoc
committee which was made thrce weeks ago, staff was directed to
finalize the architectural program and the associated exhibits in order
to tie these to an architectural contract that will be brought back to
the Board for approval regarding the prc-dcsig~ or schematic design for
Phase One of the expansion program.
Mr. Dorri11 referred to Exhibit "B", which is tho Architectural
Program prepared by Po1izzi/lleery, explaining that this exhibit
indicates provisions for an immediate ten-year need. He said that,
approximately 265,425 sq. ft. of space plus grossing factors of 88,475
sq. ft. (corridors, vertical circulation, stair wells, etc.), which
totals 353,899 sq. ft. He explained that this figurc included both new
and renovated structures and not total new construction. He said that
the projected cost is $30,317,842, which comes to an average cost ~f
$85.66 per square foot.
He also referred to the associated Exhibits, "~", which i8 a
design, construction and equip:nent budget, and -e-, which ¡.-ð-critical
date 8chedule for the program. Mr. Dorrill stated that these-three
exhibit. will become part of the County'. architectural contract for
pha.e one.
aOOK 063 rat( fiT7
P119. 9
.....- ........_-~
.
I n
A~ ~~ ".,......_~..;.....,.._.~ _!;;;;......--...r
_"'l:;'~~.~~<~~"'...-2l::sr~
ï
;
I
I
I
!
I
!,
!
I"
I
f
;,.
: ~
¡\
t.
:y
r'
¡ ~
1\
¡
"!
"";
J
BOOK 063' PACE 57B
September IS, 1981
Mr. Daryl Bailes, of Polizzi/Heery, distributed copies of Exhibits
-A" and "C", and Mr. Dorrill explained that this is the first time that
a total projdct bl1dget has been prepared by Polizzi/Heery. He said
that the figures therein are for escalated dollars reflecting projec-
tions of what actual construction will cost when that effort is
.'
undertaken two to three years from now. , Also, included in the budget
are ccntingency items, professional services related to architectural
and engineering design, and estimated projections for equipment, owner
furnishings, interior design and project contingencies.
Mr. Dorrill said that Exhibit "C" includes stringent "owner-
(Board of County Commissioners) review process as the schematic dosign
phase is gone through. He explained that, as the designs and the
conceptual models are prepared, they will be subject to "owner"
approval prior tc proceeding any further. Also, it is to be recognized
that it is hard to plan for ten years and th~ architectural plan and
associated exhibits presented today ðre subject to change. He referred
to the E~ecutive Summary, page 2, ddted 9/11/81 and read the five
points on which final decisions are yet to be made relating to this
progr'm. County Manager Norman assured Commissioner Brown that the
program is designed in such a way as to allow the Board to change their
mind on any given matter, as tho program progresses. He said that each
step will be brought to the Board for their review and approval.
Certain det~ils within the Architectural Program (Exhibit "8")
were discussed briefly, including some concerns expressed by
Commissioner Pistor related to the Court Reporter's area. Clerk Reagan
explained that the County must provide space for activities associated
with Criminal Court matters that are covered by this agency, addin9
that if the Board is concerned about the work done in association with
civil matters, then, perhaps, the County Attorney and County Manðger
Peg e 10
~
~
~
~
l!:!
¡
I
¡
,.~~.
..
.
.
If "'"
_.. ......-.,,,
."-~~""_"''';'M ~"I!:L ~-~
September 15, 1981
will have to go through the program and work with the Court Reporters
to determine the amount of space needed to provide these other
.ervices. He also explained that there is more than one Court Reporter
that requires space. County Manager Norman stated that, according to
discussions that were forthcoming during the workshop session, it WaS
his understanding that the County anticipates a contractual arrangement
to be entered into with the Court Reporter regarding the payment of
rent for space required to handle civil matters. Another matter that
was discussed briefly was the proposed space allotted for use in the
jail referred to as a receiving room for cigarettes, knives, yeast,
sniffing materials, etc. Chairman pistor asked for an explanatIon a~d
Hr. Bailes explained that certain materials that are meant for one
purpose may be used for a detrimental or misappropriated use, if not
closely supervised, therefore, they must be "controlled". Another
question Chairman Pistor raised was why the Tax Collector's office has
proposed a "break room", noting tnat this is the only department that
has such a fari1ity? He also asked about the proposal for two water
closets for the County Commissioners, noting that this was never
discussed. Commissioner Kruse noted that she was contacted by a
gentleman concerned that the jail should have separate facilities for a
chapel. Mr. Bailes stated that how much space that must be provided
for chapel services is ð debatable point, and he explained there is one
aulti-purpose space of 1,000 sq. ft. proposed within the program that
could serve as an educational facility as well as be used for religious
.ervices. He said that Polizzi/Heory agrees that chapel space is
appropriate, what has not ,been agreed upon is how much space Is
required for a population of 416 inmates. He said that this Is on the
8follow-up" list that may necessitate coming to the Board and reque.t-
ing additional space tor certain kinds of activities at a later date.
ÞOCX 063 fACE 579
PIu¡e 11
..
ßOOK 063 PACE 580
September IS, 1981
He reminded the Board that ~he program is subject to change through
further review and he outlined the methodology by which these changes
can be made according to the critical date schedule. He asked the
Board for authorization to proceed with ~he next step so that the
negotiated contract can be worked out for presentation to the Board for
approval in approximately one month. Mr. Bailes stated that, in order
for the critical dates schedule to be maintained and to avoid costly
Change Orders, all decisions rcgarding amounts of space and kinds'of
facilities should be finalized by Dccember 15, 1981.
After a brief discussion regarding the two volume set of documents
roferrod to as Exhibit We", Chairman PIstor noted that he consider. the
program and relevant documents DS examples of excellent work and
Commissioner Brown moved to proceed with the next step as recommended
by the staff. Commis5ioner Kruse seconded the motion. Commissioner
Wimer stated that he would vote favorably on the motion, however, he
wishod the record to re~lect thDt he nIno is In fnvor of a separate
facility or space allocated for chapel services in the jail.
Commissioner ero~ agreed, adding that he does not feel that the
facility has to be too large nor teo elaborate. Chairman Pistor stated
that he has been approached by some roligious leaders in the community
that may supply the "window dressing" needed for the chapel. Upon call
for the question, the motion carried 4/1, with Commissioner Wenzel
oppose(] .
Commissioner Kruse moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
carried 4/1, with Commissioner Wenzel opposed, that the tentative
budget and the schedule of critical dates (Exhibits ·A" and .C.) b.
approved. County Manager Norman explained that the Board would not be
committed to the factors within these documents, however, they will be
Included in the architectural contract.
Peg. 12
l
¡
I
I
,
I
f !
,.
r:.:m
' ,
~.."'."
~
~
''''':i:'~..r'~"F'..~;;l·íI'{ ,,'
'~'f~·~>:;'\::.: r,' :',I'!;l~!){~,~"-~~~~1~~(tj~t;):<.~, ~'\"'"
, :p:,' ".',
'h_............__.."-.."·_....__..."·_·__~·-·"__"".."'~'"'·,,.........._....·_·
, ~
¡
I '
.'
(
"
September 15, 1981
PETITION CP-8l-12C, HENRY M. MINSTER, REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FROM COMMERCIAL & AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY
TO RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY (6.22 - 30 UNITS PER GROSS AeRE) -
SECTION 5, T48S, R25E - DENIED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
July 10, 1981, as evidenced by Affidavit of publication filed with the
elerk, public hearing, having been continued from from 8/11/81 and
8/25/81, was opened to consider potition CP-81-12C, filed by Henry M.
Minster, requesting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for
Commercial and Areas of Environmental Sensitivity lo Residential
MOdium/High Density (6.22 - 30 units per gross acre) for a portion of
Section 5, T48, R2~E.
Planner Terry Clark stated that the petitioner has been out of
town and that this is why the subject petition has been continued. He
referred to the Executive Summary dated 7/6/81 and summarized the
information theroin. He stated thðt the Board had considered this
petition about a month ago and that, at that time, the members of the
Board had s~mo apprehension on hearing this petition because there was
no commitment from the petitioner as to the proposed density and use of
the land. He said that, pursuant to this, the petitioner and the staff
have met and concurred with limiting the density to 12 units per acre,
thus, coming into line with the proposed density within the new Zoning
Ordinance. Mr. Clark outlined the location of the subject property on
an overhead map, indicating that it is surrounded to the east and south
by Medium residential medium/high density and to the west by an area of
environmental sensitivity. He also said that there is strip commercial
development to the north of the subject property in Lee eounty.
The petitioner stated the the reason for de1ayi"9 this petition
v.. because the eommlssion thought that he would have the right to
aoox 063 PACE 58I
Pag. 13
.. -- . ... -- .... .- - . ..
.
"1 .¥ "'..(
,
(
. I
, I
¡
j
BOOK 063 PACE 582
September 15, 1981
build up to 30 units per acre, adding that the zoning moratorium Is not
in effect and that the new proposed ordinance will only allow 12 units
per acre for the County recommended zoning, and he stated that he 18
satisfied with this. He said that his only concern is that, now that
there is a zoning moratorium in effect, he would like to know when the
new zoning ordinance would be approved. Chairman pistor stated that
this would be approved on January 5, 1982.
Planner Terry Clark stated that the subject petition is requesting
. .
a chango in the Comprehensive Plan to allow this property to be
designated as residential medium/high density for the purpose of
accommodating the proposed zoning change. In answer to Commissioner
Brown, Planner Lee Layno stated that staff is satisfied with the
request and recommends approval, adding that the present zoning is RM-2
and that the new zoning ordinan~e will take it down to 12 units per
acre.
There was some discusûion regarding the property adjacent to the
subject property which Mr. Minstcr claims has a much higher density
requiroment, during which Chairman pistor questioned Mr. Minster's
statement and Mr. Clark explained that this is so, if one is to include
j~s~ the property on which the conðominiums are constructed. He
. ~ . -: :: 4
explained that the adjoining property is actually a PUD, with an
overall density of about 4.5 units per acre. Mr. Minster stated that
there is also water area on this adjacent property included in the PUD,
and Ms. Layne explained that the owner of that property has title to
tho land under water and thus it was figured into the density
requirements. She said that somo of the property includes an improved
platted bulkhead, approved by the State and the County several year.
ago, thus the owners have title to the bottomland in question.
Upon Ms. Layne's statement that the public hearing require.
Peg. 14
.
.
~;a
j~jj
~
-. ,
, ., -..'. -; "
. ~. . ..~ .. . ".
); . ~. "".,. '.
"
"
September l5, 1981
closing prior to a vote on the petition because the public hearing was
not closed on ~ugust 25, 1981 and no final action was taken on that
date, Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by eommissioner Brown, and
J
carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed.
eommissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse, that
petition CP-8l-12C be granted. The motion failed 2/3, with
eommissioners Wenzel, Wimer and pistor voting nay.
LfASE AGREEMENT RE 1975 CHEVROLET AMBULANCE FOR USE BY TilE CITY OF
EVERGLADES - APPROVED
Public Safoty Director Thomas Hafner stated that, pursuant to
Board direction on Septembor 8, 1981, he has explored the possibility
of selling the 1975 Chevrolet ambulanc~ to the City of Everglades
rather than leasing it for $1.00 a year as he had recommended on that
date. He said that he has found that the ambulance could represent
approximately $2,400 in trade-in value towards the purchase of a new
ambulance, and that tho motor pool estimatoR that it would cost
approximately $2,700 to repair the subject ambulance. He said that,
baaed on the potential trad£-in value and cost of repair, it would not
be unreasonable to ask $100 for the unit bocauso that is the estimated
-junk" value.
Hr. flafner stated that he still rocommends leasing the vehicle,
because total relinquishing of the vehicle would negate any power of
control of the use of the unit, and that by leasing it to the City of
Everglades for $1.00 a year the County could control that use and see
th~t is is used only a8 a "rescue vehiclo" and not as an ambulance.
~OOK 063 PACE 583
Page 15
. ..... ...' .-
I
I
I
,
I
,
'''fL ~l :~¡ML}T:'~ '~:=n~'~- ¡ '~A;:'":'·I."'::::;'~;·;~~I_~...~:,...,_)
.
"'"_"··""___~'_'_'_~_~"""_"'"""".._;,.'''"''''''_''''r'''''.''"¡_______"--
II
I
~OOK
063 PACê 584
September 15, 1981
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
carried 4/1, with Commissioner Wenzel opposed, that the 1975 ehevrolet
: ambulance be leased to the City of Everglades for $1.00 a year and that
the Chairman be authorized to exccute the lease. *
* Lease not received as of October 6, 1981. L.C.
RESOLUTION 81-204 RE PETITION P~'-81-12C, KEVIN STONEBURNER, REQUESTNG
PROVISIONAL USE (5) OF THE ESTATES DISTRICT FOR A NURSING HOME ON
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH S IDE OF RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD
ADOPTED; RESOLUTIONS 79-291 80-52; & 81-171 - RESCINDED.
Planner Lee Layne referred to the Executive Summary dated 9/3/81
and summarized the contents therein regarding petition PU-81-12C, filed
by Kevin Stoneburner, requesting a provioional use (5) of the Estates
district for a nursing home on property located on the south side of
Rattlesnake Hammock Road. She explained that the majority of the
subject propcrty was approved for the subject provisional use in 1978
and, at that time, the property was an "L"-shaped parcel. Ms. Layne
said that the petitioner now wishes to have the provisional use applied
to a regular shaped parcel and that the provisional use be rescinded on
the remaining portlond of the pruperty.
Ms. Layne stated that the staff recommends approval of the
request, subject to the following stipulations:
1. Final site drainage plan be reviewed by the County Engineer
prior to the issuance of any building permits.
2. Fire hydrants be located on the northern boundary of the
proper t y.
3. Public water roquired.
4. 17.5 ft. of right-of-way along the north property line be
dedicated for widening of C-864 when requested by the County.
Ms. Layne stated that the staff is also recommending that
Resolutions 79-29, 80-52, and 81-171 which related to the original
"
Page 16
.
.
&;~~~¿}
~j
c:::o
-'.
"
>'C'~6<~:'.
,,_t'. ..,.-.... ,""...
li,·:··;~
September IS, 1981
provi.iona1 use be rescinded.
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by eommissioner Brown and
carried unanimously, that Resolution 81-204, approving the provisional
use requested in Petition PU-8l-12C, filed by Kevin Stoneburner, be
adopted, subject to staff stipulations 1 and, that the above-referenced
resolutions be rescinded.
---.-....-.-- -.--
&OOX 063 PACE 585
Pa9. 17
.' - .. '..~'
..
, .~ ~~.-.:.,t,,~
'. ... .
" :0-. """".fl':" "Ii, .:.....,:
...............__.__,_....0<..,_""........";"....",,.._..,.
..-- ,---
. . . - ~..".-
September 15, 1981
RESOLUTION 81-205 RE PETITION SNR 81-ge REQUESTING TilE eHANGE IN STREET
NAME FROM AMSTERDAM BOULEVARD TO JOSEPH D. TESTA BOULEVARD AT THB
ENTRANCE TO NAPLES ESTATES MOBILE nOME PARK - ADOPTED
planner Lee Layne explained that Petition SNR-81-ge, filed by
Naples Estates, is requesting the change of ð street name from
Amsterdam Boulevard to Joseph D. Testa Boulevard for a street located
at the entrance to Naples Estates Mobile Home Park located at County
Barn and Rattlesnake Hammock Roads, Section 17, T50S, R26E, in memory
of Joseph D. Testa, former owner and operator of Naples Estates. She
reported that it is staff's recommendation that this street name be
- ._- .._-
approved.
eommissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and
carried unanimously, that Resolution 81-205 approving the aforemen-
tioned street name change, be adopted.
eoox 063 tAtE589
'-9. 18
~.. ..- ....-
.
.
--.. ......-- ...--. ---_.--.,.._-,---~-_--..--,
.
J
j
I i
I
I
I·
ßOOK 063 PACE 592
September 15, 1981
RESOLUTION 81-206 RE LOCAL GOVERNMENT eOMPREIIENSIVE PLANNING ASSISTANe!
PROGR~M - ~DOPTEDI CHAIRMAN AUTHORIZED TO SIGN GRANT ~PPLIe~TION RI
SAME PROGRAM.
Following a brief description of the Local Government Comprehen-
sive ~ssistance Program and the ways that the grant funds from the
Department of Community ~ffairs may be used, Commissioner Wimer moved,
.econded by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously, that Resolution
81-206 re the aforementioned program, be adopted and that the Chairman
be authorized to sign the relevant grant application.
Pa9. 19
.
.
~~!\1J
;ra
!!!!
" '~--"""""'M)""""" .'
" '. '~""~'..''''~J1i!C___'_. ' '~;",I,'
-"""'............."..__............,"'.............,,--"',..."""''''..
''''', "'
.
"
"
,
.:
'),
.. .~. -
Septcmb~r IS, 198!
i
~
l
~
. *
RECESS - TIME: 10:00 A.M. to 10:10 A.M.
. * *
*
.
"'
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATOR TO MEET WITH THE BCBB AND ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS RE ALTERATIONS TO CHANNEL UPSTREAM OF HENDERSON CREEK WEIR
FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BCC IN TWO WEEKS
Public Works Administrator Clifford Barksdale stated that pursuant
to the Board's direction, after hearing his own preliminary report
regarding the Henderson Creek Weir on 9/1/81, the consultant Charles
King, of Griener Engineering, has prepared a report. Mr. Barksdale
said that Mr. King ~e1ivcred that report to the WMAß on 9/9/81 and Is
prepared to make a similar presentation today.
Mr. Barksda1e asked that Mr. Ted Smallwood, who was with the firm
of Black, Crow & Eidsness at the time the firm prepared the District VI
Report and later was the County's consultant during the design stages
and developed the preliminary design reports for the Henderson Creek
Weir, be given the opportunity to make a Fresentation of the background
of the District VI Report, for the purpose of a better understanding of
the entire District area and the relationship of tho District with the
subject weir.
Mr. Smallwood, stated that the objective of the Report is a water
management plan which would permit urban development of an area, that
had been identified by the Planning staff as an area that would be
developing, and preservation of the natural resources associated with
the area. He identified the following as the major considerations of
tha t plan:
1.
Adequate drainages In order that the existing and project~d
development cou1d take place in an organized and orderly
lash ion.
Preservation of the historic hydrology: In order to .lnl.1z8
the impact on the natural environment associatod with this
2.
&OOK 063 'A~ 599
Page 20
.
""'" ;.H.,A ."', .c""'~'J ~ .-.....4MI.À
~ ~1 _.~..o-l_""'·
..
I
M~! 063 PA:E600
September 15, 1981
area, including the integrity of the sensitive marine
estuaries that are seaward of the upland areas south of US
41.
3. Pre3ervation of the groundwaterl In order to preserve the
upland areas of wetlands, such as the cypress Blough areas as
defined in tho report.
Mr. Smallwood referred to a chart that was used when the District VI
Report was first presented, identifying the major f10wways, the primary
preservation areas and an area that was ca11ed a conservation area at
that time. He noted that the greater portion of the preservation area
lies south of US 41 and is pre~ominantly saltwater marshes, mangroves
and estuary. He also identified some areas north of US 41, which are
predominantly freshwater marshes and cypress areas. He explained that
the plan recommended an approach for permitting development to occur
that provided for flowways and stormwater runoff, including tributaries
which run into the :::~j0r fply Canal outfall discharge point. He also
outlined a second basin within the study area which has several
discharge points, the primary one being 'that which comes from just west
of the Air Park development down into the Naples Manor area which is
actually being developed in the middle of a cypress slough. He said
that methods have been developed within this area which allowed the
area to be developed in a reasonable fashion and still allowed for
getting water around this area and drainage into the waterways. He
pointed out a secondary slough west of 951 which came in and tied into
the discharge into the estuarieß. Mr. Smallwood said that the plan was
to bring the floodways down to the point where the saltwater marshes
and the mangrove fringes are and, at that point, to re-establish
sheet flow back into the estuaries, so as to minimize the impact on the
estuaries and yet permit stormw~ter discharge during the flood periods.
In answer to Chairman pistor, Mr. Smallwood said that the
predominant areas that were identified as ·preservation" are 80uth of
Page 21
. ,
"
..
~
----
~..
~
F,',,"...;H
'1
v '........... '~.....~... ,,~.
~~~t~~~ ~:, ¡:.
_._-_.~J ~
. - . - _. . -...- --..
September 15, 19B1
US 41, however, there are approximately 300 acres north of US 41 which
were Identified in green on the chart.
Mr. Smallwood said that another area which is of prime concern now
is that area contributory to the Henderson Creek outfall. He said the
Henderson Creek drainage basin is not an area that was totally defined
within Water Management District VI. He said that tributaries to this
basin are outside the boundaries of this district. Ho pointed out the
.ain tributary, along CR 951, which does tie into the canal that was
dug into Henderson Creek, ending up 1/2 to 3/4 mile west of the
original creek.
Mr. Smallwood said that the structures 'hat ~~re recommonded as
part of the overall plan for preservation of the estuary and for
permitting the drainage of this area in f'1ture phnning and development
were beneficial in that they were to provide a salinity barrier along
US 41, same being the primary natural blockage, acting as a dike and/or
buffer zone between tidewater and freshwater uplands. He said that the
report included a recommendation to establish a seriec of weirs alollg
this line (U.S. 41) where the underpasses occur and to maintain the
groundwater table at or near the groundlevel during flood periods and
to permit this water to drain off in a reasonable fashion back into the
estuaries and redistribute that water back into sheetflow. He said
that this would prevent saltwater intrusion in the area and would
permit development to occur.
Hr. Smallwood stated that the preservation of the groundwater
table In the subject area also has a secondary function, In that it Is
currently protecting the freshwater supply for Marco Island. Mr.
S.allwood said that that was not a primary consideration in 1974, at
the ti.e that District VI was put together, however, it i. one of the
pri.ary i.plementation factors of thi. report a. a part of the overall
&OOX 063 PACE 601
Page 22
. '
_......~~ ·...r
· f
.
I
· '~"""w.-:""'1fII';Iì~~-..
...
_"""~O'___"
BOOK U63 PAGE 602
September 15, 1981
plan. He explained that the need for this protection arose as time
moved forward and the provision of freshwater resources for Marco
became more imminent and demanding.
Mr. Smallwood stated that, from his recollection of the decision
to proceed with this structure, there was a great amount of emphasis on
saltwater intrusion in that particular area, adding that this was one
of the primary functions of the Henderson Creek Weir. He said that
since 1974 there has been another plan prepared, known as the District
VII Plan. He said that this covers the area north of District VI,
beginning in the southern portions in the City of Naples and moving up
the coast to the County line. He said that a number of structuros have
been recommended and constructed to date, adding that their primary
purposes are saltwater intrusion and surface water storage. He
referred to structures existing on Halderman Creek (just north of US
41), the Gordon River (just east of Goodlette Road at the parkway
extension), the West Branch of the Cocohatchee (on Immokalee Road), and
the structure on SR31 (j ust north of the Parkway). He said that all of
these, to his knowledge, are functioning according to their original
intent and design. He referred to a number of other structures that
exist, including thoso in the Golden Gate area. He said that all of
these structures, including the raising of the crests of the Golden
Gate Estates' structures to retard freshwater movement, have, as their
primary function, the prp.servation of the natural resource from
saltwater intrusion and the preservation of the natural resource In the
estuaries which are vital to the production of commercial and sports
fishing in this area.
Mr. Smallwood stated that the report recommends that, within each
devlopment, lake systems and natural wetland areas are to be utilized
for retention of atormwater to permit the natural hydro-periods to be
PI']' 23
~
~
Œ:E!
t::::3
1
-
~~:u:.t:...-T~¡...,.·_r
---~----_._.-.-._, ....._.~- ..'."
.-
·. ... - ... ..
....
- _... _. -
September 15, 1981
~aintained within the area and to permit the natural ecology of the
area to remain basically unchanged.
Mr. Smallwood addressed the matter of acquisition of preservation
lands by stating that the District VI Report was the first recommen-
dation towards the development of TDR's for the protection of
preservation areas. He said that one of the recommendations was for
the Bee to set up a program whereby developments that occurred would
receive TDR's towards development of upland areas for wetland areas
that were put into preserv~tion. He said that the report states that
approximately 50\ of the 300 acres north of US 41, which would be
requircd to be kept in preservation, could be obtained by TDR's, and,
as a result of this, the need for possible acquisition of upland areas
would be minimized.
Mr. Smallwood concluded his presentation on the intent of the
Distr ict VI and Henderson Creek report by stating that he belleves the
structures that have gone forth to date have all met the goals that the
acc adopted as the desires of the communities. He said that, at this
point in time, if tho County were to say that it no longer has an
interest in wbter management and that its only interest is in
developing the floodways and surface water discharge facilities, that
eollier County will, as many other counties in the state of Florida,
wind u~ with a major water shortage in th~ near future. He encouraged
Bee to accept the present design of Henderson Creek and to proceed
forward with the implementation of the water management facilities as
recommended in the District VI Report~
Mr. Charles King, of Greiner Engineering Sciences, Inc., speakin9
a. the eounty's form~r consultant, made a presentation of the
Operational Report of Henderson Creek Watershed, Structure HC
HCC-3, period August 15 - September 1, 1981, dated September
aOOK 063 PACE 603
and
4, 1981.
Page 24
.
--..-...---'--- -
------J
I
BOO~ 063 PACE 80'4
September 15, 1981
Mr. King explained that his firm was retained to design water
control structures HC and HCC-3 and that the work, which began in 1977,
continues through the operational period which is what is being
experienced now. Mr. King said that, when his firm was given the
assignment to design the structures, they were also given a copy of the
Disrict VI Report, addressed earlier by Mr. Smallwood. He said that
Criener Engineering was asked to review the District VI Report, to make
recommendations, and to preliminarily design structures that would
accommodate those design factors within the report, or, to bring forth
other design recommendations which might alter the District VI Report's
recommendations for implementation.
Mr. King stated that prior to actually getting started, his firm
arranged a tour for several Commissioners to look at water control
structures very similar to what is now installed at Hend~rson Creek to
get some idea of the methodology app1 ied. to that system and, upon that
taking place, the firm began to implement the report. fie stated that
these structures were conceived during an era that this county went
through after the development of Golden Gate during which a great
impetus was given to re-establishing the sheet flow or high groundwater
levels throughout the county. He said that he believes that this is 0
good position for tho county to be in, i.e. operating the wat~rtables
as high as possible without undue stress on the environment or the
persons owning and 1 iv ing upon the land.
He referred to paragraphs 4 through 6, on page 1 of his report
regarding the management plan envision that much of the fresh water
marsh area above Structure HC is to be acquired as "preservation lands-
and b. operated through a wet-dry cycle to sustain the wetland
environment. He added that, to that end, the dry cycle groundwater
levels were envisioned to recede to lower than 1 ft. below natural
Page 25
....._-
.
.
~~:;¿J
..~~
p.:¡¡~
~
t
_..._,--_...-_...._....~, ··_·-t.._,..,-..,,·~···.
Ii
r
1_ _0 _om ..
..._ .-1....'-'
.' .
September lS, 1981
9round in the dry season and this is what is happening. He stated
that, at the same time, the control structure must have the design
integrity of a positive salinity barrier to elevations that would
withstand overtopping from tide floods.
Mr. ~ing outlined the Master Plan Design Data as outlined on page
1 of his report and noted that it is very important to realize that
there was no way to separate the discharges from HC and HCC-3, as they
are hydraulically connected via a canal along the north side of US 41.
He said that, because the flood plain level is such, both structures
share a common flood stage. Therefore, said Mr. King, there is really
no way to separate 'he d63ign integrity of the two structures: they
must act coincidentally.
Mr. King st~ted that his firm considered the information in the
District VI Report regarding the design discharges as "underestimated",
adding that they alse felt that the drainage basin could be even larger
than that which was calculated, according to the design discharge
factors In the basic document. He said this was discussed with tho
County and the WMAB and that his firm then made the recommendation that
the crest elevation of the main and secondary weirs be lowered to an
elevation of 5.0 and the movable weir gate be increased to a 12 ft.
length. Also, that the peak discharge for the two weirs be set at 694
cta at the control stage of 5.7 ft. for a peak 2S-YQar discharge. He
said that this was accepted and approved for proceeding by tho eounty
in a letter dated 12/29/77. He said that, actually, the present
condition discharge goes up to 941 cfs for 100 yr. storm at elevation
6.2 ft. He said that on a future developed condition, they go up to
1670 cts at an elevation 6.9 ft. He said that this means that the
..t~uctures are actually designed to pass these high frequency .to~.
through a watershed that has an indeterminate watershed area.
'OOK 063 p~c£ 605
'.9- 26
.
_..__,w
'T
¡~'.
j
f
!-
I
.
BOOK 063 PACE 606
September 15, 1981
Mr. King said that certain facts involved with the Henderson Creek
system need to be considered, including that, if 541 cubic feet per
second could be discharged for 24 hours, only approximately 1 inch of
water would be taken off of an indeterminate watershed of about 20
square miles. He said that another fact that needs to be considered is
that, if it were possible to excavate the total Henderson Creek canal
to Wdry", i.e. take all the water out of it by over-draining it, it
would only hold about 0.15 of a watershed inch. He said that that this
means that the Henderson Creek canal system holds very little water as
a storage system, as compared to the amounts of rain that have fallen
lately. He said that the bankful channel capacity of Henderson Creek
above HCC-3 was approximately 700 cfs prior to construction of the
structure and 550 cfa with the structure in place. He said that this
means that the actual c a pa c i t Y of the canal has been red uced by
installing the structure within it by about 150 cu. ft. per second. He
said another fact tha t is important to consider is that the wa te r shed
areas above these two control structures may exceed 20 sq/miles during
flood conditions because of the indeterminate type of watershed that it
Is and due to the transfer of flow in the watershed of the Everglades
area during that period. Hd explained that water seeks the least area
of resistance and flow, to the lowest outlet. Mr. King saId that the
rainy season just experienced was a perIod that would cause this to
take place. He referred to Page 3 of the report, outlining the
conditions during the period from August lS, through September 1, 1981,
adding that the gauge at Big Cypress indicated that from August 4
through 27, 1981, there were 13.45 inches of rainfall and that 10.1
inches of that rain fell in the ten day period betwen August 18 through
27, 1981. He said that those 10 inches fell upon saturated conditions,
thus running about 4 Inches above normal rainfall, causing the entire
Pac¡ e 27
... .. -.... . .. .-
~XJ
. g}~W~~
~
T
1*
1,
~
,
,
Sept~rnber lS, 1901
Everglades system to overflow simultaneously from 8 drainage area far
above the area of the structure. lie said that this could possibly been
from as far north as the Golden Gate area. Mr. King said that, during
this period, the control structure actuall y operated in the design
perameters which were set forth in the Master P1 an.
Mr. King referred to PI ate t1 of his report and outlined the
various data therein. He stated that this plate proves that the water
control structure has the ability to draw the water down from the
p~nding system above the structure and that the canal system, in his
opinion, does not have the ablity to transmit as much water as the
control structure can discharge.
The most important factor for the entire structure that needs to
be considered, said Mr. King, is the effective salinity barrier along
US 41, which is, in his opinion, the most important design and future
perameter with which the BCC will deal. He said that the "true"
salinity line is about I mile south of 411 however, this does not
present an opportunity to actually effectuate the salinity line wheroas
US 41 does.
. . .
Commissioner Brown left the room at this time: 10:37 A.M.
. * *
Mr. King continued to outline the establishment of a salinity line at
the site of US 41 whereby the control structures can be tied to this
-levy-like" system and stop the salt watAr intrusion above that point.
Mr. King explained how the elevation of 5 ft. was chosen, stating
that the annual yearly maximum spring tide at the structure i. about
3.4 ft. and the one in five year flood tide at the control structure is
about 4.3 ft., which means that, for design purposes, the de.ign
elevation of the creat of the weir above 4.3 insure. a safety factor.
Øe r..inded the BCC that the Master Plan called for an elevation of 5.7
aOOK 063 PAC( 607
Page 28
.
.
~
1)C~X <J63 PA~E 608
September 15, 1981
and that this was compromised in the orginal design, based on the da1a
gathered. lie explained that the engineers did not want to encroach 00
low on the elevation due to possible backwater from the tide flood t
encroach again into the potable water system abovo that point. Mr.
~ing explained that, if a hurricane tide or other wind driven tides
occur, there is a low gate on the structure which will allow for
flushing the saltwater back out of the system.
* * ~
Commissioner Brown reentered the meeting at this time: 10:45 A. .
Mr. King s: Id tha t the Co unty :ng lne.r has askad t:at his fIr."
look into the possibility of providing more discharye at the low sta[..
for the structure if, in fact, it is found that the drawdown system
needed to b~ increased. He said that three possibilities were looke
at, as outlined within the report on pages 4 and 5. He referred to
Cond it ion I I I, which would lower the elevation from 5.0 to 4.0 ft, a d
increase the capacity from 376 to 606 cfs at the con trol elevation 0
5.5 ft. and A combined discharge from 598 to 827. He also outlined he
positive and negative effects of this condition, as outlined on the- '.
same page of the report, concluding that he considers this method as
highly undesirable. . ..
He referred to Co:,dition IV, which would add a 4 X 4 sluice at he
Hee-3 structure and increase its capacity from 376 to 50S cfs at the
control elevation of 5.5 ft. and the overall capacity of both
structures from 598 to 727 cfs. fie outl ined the positive and negðti .
effects of this alternative, includ ing the fact that this would cost,
$17,300. He added that the present canal sY8te~ would probably not
deliver the additional water and, therefore, this alternative probab y
would not be effective.
He referred to Condition V, which includes putting in a 4 X 8
Page ,
.
.
~
IIiIiaìííI
. éW8
.
L...:
_. r>-".--'" _~_ ~~...__., ~-< "....
._"_ ._...._... ._.',,-n_
September 15, 1981
sluice gate on the structure without a salinity gate on It. He
outlined the effects of this method, including the fact that this woulð
cost about $23,450.
Mr. King referred to the recommendation outlined in detail on
pages 6 and 7 of his report and carefully went over each paragraph,
concluding that it is important that the Board understand that his
recommendation is to not take any futher action at this time; to
operate the structure, as it is already modified and outlined in
Condition II, for a much longer period of timo; and that, if further
alterations are deemed necessary, the only other method of alteration
or modification that he would recommend would be as outlined in
Condition IV of the report. He said that Condition IV would not impair
the integrity of the structure as a salinity barrier. He concluded
that the structure is, in his opinion, operating according to the
original intent of the BCC. He said that he sees no reason for
recommending that the Commission consider anything other than that
which has already been don~. He said that his firm does think that
some compatible policy needs to be established, regarding areas above
the structure, whereby the County's development and water management
policies will be compatible.
Commmisaioner Pistor asked if Mr. King is aware of any plans to
eliminate structures HCC-I and HCC-2, as recommended in the Master
Plan, for placement north of HC and HCC-37 Mr. King replied
negatively, adding that it is his personal opinion that, perhaps, they
should not be installed if the County in going to continue to manage
Ree-3 at the level that is now being established. Al~o, these two
additional structures would further impair the ability of Renderson
ereek Canal to transmit water downstream to RCC-3. This was discus.ed
at length, during which eommissioner pistor asked how important to the
063 PAc£609
&OOK
Page 30
.
, '" ~ . ~
... '." " ~~> .;.. .#,~ " ,
·--.--...-----
M()~ 063 PAC£ 610 ~ =
t
September 15, 198~
sy~tem ~oul~ 1 it be. if the eounty were to . ch~ng. the, aCcess rOðds~ : ~ -: ~
upstream,of HCC-3 t9·real bridges and/or-Increase-:the, ~ize of:thQ.e -~~
culv~rts.~ndert~~ roads, adding ,t~athe thiry~s_~hey:a~e:~c~iryg;~~ ~;
dam. Mr. King agreed and said that it must be understood·th~t the,
Henderson Creek Canal has a certain design capacity and any:structure
in that.canal will further obstruct the flow of water downstream. He
said ~hat what he is saying is that the control structure has the
ability to pass the water through, if it can get there. He said that
anything that can be done to Henderson Creek Canal to improve the
discharge, ,if this is what the County wan~s to_do, wi1lactually.:-
improve the elevation upstream of the system. In answer to.County."
Manager Norman, Mr. I\ing stated tha t he is not a wa r e of any stud ie 8
directed towa rds these obstructions and their effect on the system. He
said that there is no question tha t the canal system cannot transmit
the water to the structure as fast as the structure can draw down tha t
water. He added that the canal has ð slight impedance as it approaches
the structure; however, the farther away from the structure, the less-.
that: ,structural impedance ex ists. lie sa Id that it probably goes ~back
to .practica11y zero about one mile from the structure.-
: - .. '" ~
" In answer to Commissioner Wenzel, Mr. ~ing said that saltwater has
reached an elevation of +4 about two times in t~n years or once in five
years, up to an elevation of 4.3 ft. lie said that this does not tak~
into consideration any wind. The possibility of lowering the elevation
Pac¡. 31
of the stucture below +5 was discussed further, as was the use of a
gate system for backflushing in cases of saltwater intrusion, after
which Commissioner Wenzel asked Hr. King if he thought it a good Idea
to go upstream of the structure and remove the roads that block the
canal and install bridges. Mr. King stated that he would favor
increasing the capacity of the upstream canal in order to .ove .ore
~,~~~*l
. r!ŒJ
~
~
September 15, 1981
water downsteam to the structure. Mr. Barksdale was asked by
Commissioner Wenzel if the County controlled those roads and culverts
that lie across the canal and Mr. Barksdale replied affirmatively,
explaining that the culverts lie in the canal easements. Commissioner
Wenzel asked if the County could insist that they be removed and/or
widened and Mr. Barksdale said that if the Commissioners deemed that
necessary it could be done by the County; however, he did not think
that those people served by the roads would be responsible.
Mr. Smallwood stated that the Big Cypress Basin Board is presently
cvnducting a study regarding the area from SR 951 eastward to the
Faka-Union system. He said that the recommendations within that report
will enlighten some concerns about the drainage basin and other
concerns contributing to the Henderson Creek structure. He said that
the study report will be made on October 23, 1981, at the regular BCBB
meeting and he asked the Board not to make any decisions until they
attend the meeting and hear this report. Commissioner Wenzel asked Mr.
Smallwood if he is in the position to make recommendations regarding
the opening of the culvcrts along the canal and Mr. Smal~wood said that
it is his opinion that such a method would have an insignificant impðct
on the problem and would not be cost-effective. He said that he does
think that the problem lies in the fact that the entire syatem becomes
contributory to the flow of waters as was indicated earlier by Mr. ~in9
when he explained that the basin is an Ind~terminate basin. He said
that he does not believe the solution Is moving that water into the 951
canal, he believes that the solution is to provide additional flovway.
In the subject area, in order to let that water flow in the direction
that it should be flowing, because that flow is presently being bloc~ed
by us 41 and othor structures.
Hr. Smallwood's suggestions were discussed briefly, after which
&001: 063 PACE 611
Pac¡. 32
~.~
¡
¡
r
i
J
~OOK 063 PACE 612
September l5, 1981
Commissioner Kruse made a presentation regarding apparent controversy
between the firms of Black, Crow' Eidsness, Inc., and Greiner
Engineering from 1973 through the present, which she claims has
contributed to the problems faced today by the people living in the
area of the Henderson Creek control structures that are experiencing
flooding. She referred to various charts which outlined the difference
in opinions about such things as elevations, amounts of discharge, size
of the contributing drainage basin, effects on the surface water
hydrology, draw down time, intent of the structures, ana other data
regarding the structures. She explained that she has no problem with
the engineering, as she believes that both firms did what they were
told. However, she claimed that the members of the Board that made the
decisions regarding the subject weir made those decisions based on
conflicttng information. She rcferred to the conflict of intentions
for the structurc, as outlined in copies of memorandums, letters, etc.,
as well othor conflicting data within various communications from the
County Engineer, BCBB, Water Management District, County Attorney,
Corps of Engineers, certain Commisnionerß, Utility Director, and the
consulting engineers, rcgarding the proposed construction, the intent
of the structure, and the actual design of the subjert weir. She said
that it appears to her that the structures were approved for
construction without benefit of anyone being sure exactly what would
happen when the construction was completed. She referred to the
aforementioned information as a -flip-flopping of information fro.
experts" and stat~d her opposition to the construction of all of the
control structures that have been recommended by these experts, addinq
that she disagrees with the theory that they are noeded to preserve
freshwater supplies.
Mr. Ronald Bruns, of Bruns' Bruns Inc., repre.entinq Mes.rl.
Page 31
.'
~-}
r&1
í:~:-~
--'......:..;..:'
~_....11.~
.-
I
I
I
I
i
¡
¡
.:.' ,
September 15, 1981
Grand and Square, and Naples Isles, referred to mapS, overlays, and
charts and made a presentation regarding the negative affects that the
subject structures have had on his clients' properties, including an
explanation of what the contributing basin's size really includes, same
being much larger than indicated by the consulting engineers. Mr.
Bruns claimed that because these structure were designed for a smaller
drainage basin they are not properly designed, nor do they work
properly. He claimed that weirs in Henderson Creek have contributed to
the flooding of his client's property for longer periods of time than
would have been the case if the structures were not in place. He
explained the problems associated with draw down time relevant to the-
main structure and offered examples of how the problems grew with the
amount of rain that fell in the area in the last month. Mr. Brun~
claimed thát the exact size of the drawing basin is still not known at
this time and that this is the main rea50n that the structure is not
working effectively. He recommended that the structure be altered
Immediately so that the draw down time will equal the pre-construction
levels, by removing sheet pilings where necessary and also that the
basin be analyzed for actual drainage areas to determine more accurate
design flows. He recommended that HCC-3 have a draw down facility in
the canal adjacent to the southeast wing of the structure. He said
that he thinks the channel condition below HCC-3 should be corrected to
eliminate flooding in that area and adequate outfalls for the other two
culverts under US 41 should be provided. He a1£.~ recommended that the
system be designed to draw down the water level to 2.5 elevation withtn
two to three days after a storm.
Mr. Bruns' remark. were discussed briefly, during which Mr.
Barksdale explained that there was some additional obstruction of the
opening Into the structure during construction which was the result of
tOOK 063 PAC( 6:1.3
Pa9 e 34
.
.. ',$0.' , ... ,.;~
, . "'.:."-'.Iô, ~... .
. _....__........,.....~.,.....'IIo.'"' ~....
--..-".......-
f
,
i
I
t
I
i
,
I
800K 063 PACe 6i4
September 15, 1981
the piling for the main structure not being connected into the western
bank and a coffer dam upstream of the structure was in place. He said
that did restrict the flow way during that period which was at the
onset of the rainy season. He also stated that the gates of the
structure wore opened from the beginning of the rainy season.
Mr. L. N. Ingram, representing Naples Isles, Inc., explained that
he understands that the flooding problems are associated with the fact
that the structure was designed for a smaller drainage b~sin than
actually exists and that the problem could be rectified by constructing
other control structures farther upstream in the drainage area. He
urged the Commission to consider that possibility. He also recommended
that the County buy the flooding rights, fill the land that is being
flooded, or alter the existing structure. He said that his client owns
a 182 acr~ mobile home park thaL was entirely underwater during the
rainy season and that this is an intolerable situation. He asked the
County to look into the kind of liability insurance that the conau1ting
engineers carry and requested that his clients and others that have
suffered from flooding be given immediate relief. He suggested that
perhaps the County should hire other consulting engineering firms and
consider consulting additional per£onnel regarding these structures.
There was a discussion regarding the rise in the land going east
from the subject structures, during which Mr. Barksdale said that the
rise is about one foot per mile to the northeast.
.
.
*
Commissioner Wimer left the room at this time: 11135 P.M.
.
.
*
Jerry Cutlip, Manager of Corkscrew Sanctuary and a member of the
WMAB, spoke in favor of leaving the subject structures as they are and
paq8 35
.... ..--..........
.
.
r:z,:;,$H
2!.!J
~
!kM~"
~_..L.-""'·~"'·'~'_ ....
f
,
"
J
t
I
j
!
J
~
'I
¡
J
1
¡
ì
ì
¡
..
September 15, 19A1
following the advice of Mr. King, adding that there are areas In this
County that have always flooded and that always will. He said that the
the County must not act hastily on this matter and that it was the
recommendation of the WMAB that the Board accept Mr. King's
recommendations. He stated that it would be unwise to make a decision
on the philosophy of water management for Collier County based on
problems that arose only during the month of August.
.
.
.
Commissioner Kruse left the room at this time: 11:40 A.M.
. . .
Hr. Cutlip stated that even if the County Commissioners made a
commitment to drair all Lhe flooded lands in the county, there is no
way for it to be done, i.e. financial responsibilities would negate
this from being feasible. He recommended that when a person buys land,
some mechanism should be devised whereby the purchaser is sure to know
that that land he/she is purchasing may be subject to flooding during
certain times of the year. Mr. Cutlip explained that the WMAB has
studied these matters very carofully and ~hat they unanimously agreed
with Hr. King's recommendations.
Mr. Bernie Yokel, who spoke as a member of tile WMAA, stated that
the County is looking at something that happens every year, l.e
flooding in certain areas. lie said that the subject problems related
to the area near the HenderGon Creek weir have come about because of
the heavy rains in the area and the apparent "back-to-back" five year
storms that hit that particular area so close together. He said that
another problem is that no one knows the distribution of the rain, i.e.
how hard it rains in a particular area of the subject watershed. Mr.
Yokel said that, when it rains the way it did in ~ugust, the rain piles
up over the land because it is saturated and the floods be9in. He .aid
that vhat must be accepted is that certain parts of the County will
eOOK 063 PAr.E 615
Pac¡. 36
. ,- -. ",
~....-..:.;¡ --' ..,
~ >':"" ''t''. .. . .
ff
t
-'.
.r~
~:I
BOOK 063 PACE 616
September 15, 1981
always be subject to these flooded conditions.
. * *
eommissioner Wimer re-entered the meeting at this timer 11:43 A.M.
. . *
Mr. Yokel explained the topography of the subject area and how the flat
slope of the land is contributory to flooded conditions when the land
becomes saturated. He also outlined the factors that contribute to the
the subject watershed becoming larger at some times more than at
others, i.e. rains, blowing winds, saturated conditions, water
movement, etc. Mr. Yokp.l stated that the County needs to continue to
initiate the controlled water management measures that it has in order
to protect this area from suffering a water shortage during the drought
periods as many other counties in this state have. He said that
Collier County is the only county that was not strapped with severe
water measures this summer and that this is to the credit of the county
engineers, the consulting engineers, and tho water management policies
of this county. lie said that he considers the county's assignment
relativo to wator management measures as "getting this county through
the drought".
*
*
*
Commissioner Kruse re-entered the meeting at this timet 11:45 A.M.
. * .
Commissioner Kruse stated that she does not believe that anyone
has ever said that portions of Collier County do not flood
periodically, nor has anyone ever said that the subject area now
suffering from flooded conditions does not flood from time to time.
She said that the floods have always subsided faster before the
structures were constructed. Commissioner Kruse added that the proble.
today is the duration of flooding. She stated that she believes the
subject structures contribute to a longer duration of flooding and that
this i. the reason that people complaIning. She said that the longer
Page 37
, "
.
,
_;~\1
mill
~
.....,._...,..,.~ .
,~ ..
~ ...
f II
j
'I
!
~~ptembcr 15, 19A1
the duration of flooding the more damage there will be to the property
owner. Commissioner Kruse said that she does not accept the theory
that this County will ever have to suffer a water shortage because the
water control structures are not in place on Henderson ereek. She said
that she also is uncomfortable with statements that lead one to believe
that all of the present and proposed control structures will insure
that Collier will not suffer from a water shortage and she added that
it has never been established that the reason that Collier County had
no water shortage last year was thanks to God or the county's water
management measures. She also stated that although the Corps of
Engineers established many conservation arCð~, man has not done a good
job in management of these areas, i.c. management arca II. She
explained that the animals are subjected to either flooded conditions
or to drought conditions within thia one particular management area
every time that man interrupts the Rcyc1eR of nature. She said that
she thinks that man should learn a lesson from this regarding the act
of management of certain natural cycles. This was discussed at lergth,
during which Commissioner Kruse stated that Lely, Cocohatchee, and
Henderson Creek weirs were not in place last summer and that Collier
did i1('1t have any problems with W<1ter shortages.
Mr. David Graham, speaking as a resident of Golden Gate, stated
that he has been attending meetings relative to water management and
water control structures of one kind or another for years and that he
believes that it is becoming clear that somebody or some group does not
want anyone to live east of 951 and they are using terms like "water
.anagement", Rdrought", "preservation", etc., in order to gain this
end. He said that the flooding conditions in the Golden Gate area are
getting worse, adding that he believes the County needs to look ahead
and, if development is not wanted in certain areas, the County should
~(¡O~ 063 PACt. 617
hge
--
~,"
MDÄ 063 PACE 618
September 15, 1981
purchase the land from the people and preserve It. He said that the
County is running into the violation of certain property rights and
that they need to be protected. He said that many people feel that
somebody is trying to take their land away from them and he asked the
Board to listen to them.
Mr. paul Kruse, speaking for the Golden Gate Residents,
Supporters Assoc., spoke in opposition to keeping the subject weir in
place, referring to the conflicting information that has been presented
to the Board in the past as well as this morning. He said that,
speaking as a scientist' and oceanographer by training, the amount of
water available to the people in Collier County during the dry season
has nothing to do with the water control structures, as they are not
efficient in holding water back during that time of the year. Mr.
Kruse requested that the entire structure be removed from Henderson
Creek.
During a discussion of what has been presented, Commissioner Kruse
stated that she favors taking out the subject structures and taking a
long look at what it is the County is doing, and then, if the County
wants that land, the County Ðhould buy it.
Commissioner Brown asked Mr. Barksdale what he recommends?
Commissioner Pistor stated that there is no water going over the
subject structure this morning. Mr. Barksdale stated the he is in
agreement with Mr. King's recommendation, i.e. to wait and see. He
said that it is known that these same areas have flooded in the past,
before the weir was ever constructed. He said that, now that the weir
is in and the rainfall has been extremely heavy, that same are. is
flooded once again. Mr. Barksdale said that he believes that it would
make more sense to look at the channel upstream to see if those
conditions would be improved. He said that he believe. that this would
Pðge 39
IE]
II'iIJ
!ti!L
-~<".._....,-,. ."~'>"'~>""-'''''-'----'''-''.'<--
-~,,\....,.,.'~.... .~
........ ''''...
- .
Septamber. 15, 1981
relieve some of the flooding. He said that to say that the weir is
causing the flooding in the subjecc areas does not compute.
Commissioner Wenzel asked Mr. Barksdale if he would agree that it would
be a good idea to increase the size of the culverts to the northeast?
Mr. Barksdale stated that, if this would increase the flow, he would
agree. He said that there could be obstructions in the channel itself,
downstream of the last weir. He said that when the canals were built,
as part of the road program, and even though they had a profile, when
the crew struck rock, they stopped. He said that hp knows that the
channel condition is probably not a good channel all the way through
and cannot carry th~ flows that ðrc cxpectcd of it. He said that the
reports show that this channcl was never intended to drain the area; it
is not a drainage canal. He said that a similar problem arose with SR
31, which is being four-laned now. He said that the channel was not
designed to drain the area when it was constructed, however, it has
been widened and deepened to accommodate the flows recommended in the
Dist.rict VII Report. lie said that there were no problems associated
with the control structure placed in that canal, even during the heavy
rains and construction this year. He said that he favors the
improvement of the channel relative to the Henderson Creek weir.
Chairman pistor summarized Mr. Barksdale's statements at the request of
Commissioner Brown by stating that he recommen~s accepting Mr. King's
recommendation to take no action reqarding the subject weir; to observe
the operations for the time being; and, if there is further problema,
then, consider initiating those improvements outlined in Mr. King's
report Identified as Condition IV. Chairman pistor further stated that
he thought it would be a good idea to accept Commissioner Wenzel's
suggestion and to have the staff look into increasing the flow in the
channel, adding that he believes that this could take months.
800K 063 PACE 619
pag. 40
.
_''''"''_''__'~'.~M'.'''.·' ,."....,___.
....
BDOK 063 PACE 620
Septembor 15, 1981
County Manager Norman stated that he is not sure that anyone h~s
defined what would be involved in studying the channel obstruction
problem and requested that Mr. Barksdale quantify or qualify exactly
what would be involved in conducting a meaningful study of the upstream
condition of the channel in order to determine what effects any
improvements made would have towards solving the problem. Mr.
Barksdale stated that a portion of Mr. Smallwood'n study that is
presently being conducted for t~e BCBB will quantify that matter and he
thinks that perhaps that study could be expanded to include a profile
of the channel bottom and cross-section of the channel all the way
back, including the culvert restriction and a backwater analysis, from
the I:Itructure to Alligator Alley. He said thut, at that point, it
could be detcrmined what needs to be done to the channel and the pipes
to provide the flows in the channel necessary. In answer to
Commissioner Wenzel, Mr. Barksdale stated that this could be initiated
as soon as the Board chooses to authorize it. Commissioner Brown so
moved. (Motion died for lack of a second). County Manager Norman
asked if this would n~t require a contract? Mr. Barksdale stated that
perhaps tha County could work through the contract between the BCBB and
the consulting engineer presently doing the aforementioned study.
eounty Manager Norman asked for clarification that Mr. Barksdale would
not be conducting the work himself and Mr. Barksdale concurred that he
would not. The responsibility of such a study was discussed, during
which Mr. Norman asked if this would not bo more appropriately the
responsibility of the BCBB? He asked if this would be a joint venture
between the County and the BeBB and would this be under the present
contract with CH2M Hill? Mr. Barksdale stated that it would. At the
end of the discussion Mr. Norman suggested that, if the main interest
on the part of the Board is to pursue vigorously this analysis as
Pac:¡ e 41
r~
'~
n¡,;,:.;·,;]
. ,
~
...........
'''''~''\...:~..~'~:-'':.;,,¡,'.... -.,
September 15, 19B1
described by Mr. Barksdale, perhaps Mr. Barksdale and Mr. Smallwood
should be asked to meet with their respective Boards and that by next
week there could be a definitive recommendation. Commissioner Wimer
said that this depends on what is being defined as improvements to the
upstream channel and noted that he does not want to get involved in
making that channel a mbjor canal. Mr. Norman stated that his intent
was to have an analysis of benefit to such a program being completed.
He said that no work would be authorized without such an analysis and
Commissioner wimer agreed. Mr. Barksdale agreed, adding that the aoard
must consider the cost-benefits of such improvements. He asked to come
back in two weeks w.th a recommendation after meeting with the DCBB and
the consultants.
Commissioner Brown so moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer, that
Mr. Barksdale discuss this matter with the consultants and the BCBB and
make a recommendation to the Board in two weeks.
Mr. Kruse stated that no hydrologist with any intelligonce or
integrity would say that there is anything that can be done to the
upper channel to increase the relative flow except to increase the
relative head. He claimed th~t this can only be done by removing the
subject weir. He said that, if the Commissioners do not vote to remove
the weir, his organization will work with anyone interested in forming
a class action suit against the County relative to the subject weir,
the Cocohatchee control structure and also, if they deem it necessary,
the Lely ear.al outfall structure. He said that his organization will
also du anything that it can to help anyone who feels that his land
needs to be filled to an appropriate height, noting that he considers ·
precedent has been set.
Upon call for the question, the motion carried 4/1, with
Conmi8sioner Kruse opposed.
&OOK 063 PACE 621
Pef¡. U
'-::
.'. -----_...._-,---
""·":r~_-""""""_,·
~, ; ,,....r# ....
September 15, 1981
ßOOK 063 rACE 622
RECESS: 12:15 P.M. PÆCONVENED: 1:45 P.M. at which time
Deputy Clerk Davidson was replaced by Deputy Clerk Skinner.
IMMOKALEE AIRPORT LEASE WITH DONALD RAGON'S DIESEL REPAIR SERVICE -
RENEWED
eommissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
carried unanimously, that the Immokalee Airport lease with Donald
Ragon's Diesel Repair Service be renewed.
pag e U
-----..
"
,
.
BfI
Ell
IDI
I·.· .
. .
...._.__ _-0- _____. _. ....--......-.
- ... .-.-.
"
September 15, 1981
RIVIERA COLONY GOLF ESTATES PHASE III - WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES -
AeCEPTED
utilities Manager Berzon explained that a portion of the Riviera
Colony Golf Estates Phase III sewer line was installed at less than
adequate grade but as a means of guaranteeing performance of the sewer,
the developers are offering a Surety Bond in the amount of $91,800 for
a pariod of no less than five years to ensure that the sewer will
function properly. He said that staff recommends acceptance of the
water and sewer facilities.
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and
carried unanimousl~', that Riviera Colony Golf Estates Phase III water
and sewer facilities be accepted; that the Chairman execute the Sewer
Facilities Leas~ with Lely Estates, Inc.; that the Performance Bond and
, ~
the following documents be accepted:
A) Deed for the water facilities
ß) Deed for the ~cwer facilities
C) Results of pressure tests for the water facilities
D) Bacteriological clearance from the DER
E) Lab re3ults on bacteriological t~5ts for the water lines
?) A letter from the Engineer regarding the sanitary sewer
system with attached as-built data and computations performed
with a copy of the DER's approval of the sewer facilities
G) Bill of Sale for the water facilities
H) Bill of Sale for the sewer facilities
I) Affidavit of No Liens
J) Certification conccrning any contributions in-aid of
construction
K) Verification of final cost for the water and sewer facilities
L) Up to ~ate list of customers and/or owners of individual lots
M) A letter from the Engineer certifying that all underground
utilities are located in the dedicated roads rights-of-way
N) Contractual Guarantee for materials and workmanship for
a period of at least one (1) year after the Boðrd of County
Commissioners' acceptance for both water and sewer facilities
0) A letter from the Fire District accepting the ownership
and maintenancQ of fire hydrants
P) Sewer Facilities Lease
0) A copy of the inflow/infi1trati~n test for the sewer lines
R) A letter from the DER certifying completion of project
S) Performance Bond, 5 year period
TU) Sewer Facilities Warranty,S year period
) One (1) set of as-bu1lt drawings sIgned and .ealed by
the Engineer of Record
".,.,.. 063 'ACl 63 9
PAC¡. U
__,_.._.., .."_ _..,'_...."'"'"..""__~"._"'.__~";".._,,,·_"'.._-..........""""w_ .
·.
..
September 15, 1981
LITTLE HICKORY BAY CONDOMINIUM UTILITY EASEMENTS - ACCEPTED
Utilities Manager Berzon explained the offer of utility easements
upon which to place the water meter to serve the Little Hickory Bay
Condominium which is off Bonita Beach Road.
Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Comminsioner Brown and
carried unanimously that the two utility easements for Little Hickory
Bay Condominium project be accepted and recorded. *
~-: 063 PAŒ6715
Pa9 e 45
t
.
",1
~--~" .-........--....--. ......-..<..._~,.-
~"...._,.-
_.__,.~~~","_"",~,,_, '0.""".'...·." ,.,,~'";~~""'~...._"___~___-
~ 063 PAc£68'l
September lS, 1981
PORTER STREET WATER MAIN EXTENSION - ACCEPTED
Utilities Manager Berzon explained that a wat~r main extension was
constructed by the owner of some of the lots in Trail Acres, Unit 3 and
it is being offered for acceptance for connection into the County's
water system and staff recommends acceptance.
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and
carried unanimously, that the Porter Street water main extension be
accepted along with the following documents:
A) Deed for the water facilities
B) Results of prcs~ure tests of the water lines
C) Bacteriological clearance from the DER
D) Lab results on,bacteriological tests for the water lines
E) Bill of Sale for the water facilities
F) Owner's Affidavit of No Liens
G) Certification concerning any contributions in-aid of
construction
H) Verification of final cost
I) Legal description
J) Up to date list of customers and/or owners of individuals lots
K) A letter from the Engineer certifying that the subject water
main lies within the platted right-of-way
L) Contractual Guarantee for material and workmanship for a
period of at least one (1) year after the Board of County
Commissioners' acceptance for the water faclitles
paCJe U
.'
~
IBI
~
,...,:.
-"""-..,....... ""
~.,...----..
, : ~'., .
.. .., '.. II...~.....
~&pLember 15, 1981
WIGGINS PASS CLUB - WATER MAIN EXTENSION - AceEPTED
Utilities Manager Berzon explained that the developer of Wiggins
Pass Club extended an existing water main southward along the
right-of-way of CR 901 for approximately 470 feet In order to hava
water facilities available to serve Wiggins Pass Club and that staff
recommends this extension be accepteC. He said the developers will
have a one year maintenance for the pipeline.
Commissioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and
carried 4/1, with Commissioner Wenzel oppos~d, that the Wiggins Pass
Club water main extension and the following documents be accepted:
A) Deed for the water facilities
B) Results of pressure tests for the water facilities
C) Bð.::teriolog iClIl c1e<'!rllnce from the DER
D) Lab results on bacteriological tests for the water lines
E) Bill of Sale for the water facilities
F) Affidavit of No Liens
G) Cortification concerning any contriuutions in-aid of
construction
H) Verification of final cost for the water facilities
I) Up to date list of customers and/or owners of individual lots
J) A letter from the Engineer certifying that all water
facilities have been constructcd within the rights-of-way of
CR-901
K) Contractual Guarantce for matcrials and workmanship for a
period of at lcast one (1) year after the Board of County
Commissioners' acceptance for the water facilities
L) A letter from the Fire District accepting ownership and
responsibility for future maintenance of fire hydrant
M) One (1) set of as-built drawings signed and sealed by the
Engineer of Record
ÀU~ 063 'ACE 691.
Page 47
JI
-
~
- .. ----. --- --- .... --.... ... .. .
.-.. --"-'-'-' - -- -_.-
.._,-.... ...... ...- "-., ..' - '.' .~---
-,
'ow ,. ~. .__
&OOK 063 fACE 696
September 1S, 1981
WILLOUGHBY ACRES WATER IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER '3 - APPROVED
Utilities Manager Berzon explained that the Willoughby Acre.
project has been completed and that Change Order '3 deals with water
!mprovementR which reflects the actual as-built quantities as
contrasted with those which were bid at the time the project was first
bid. He said the change is ð result of an additional hydrant ~hich was
installed, some additional driveway and sod restoration work because
the contractor had to jack and bore at the south end ent~ance. He said
the total change is an addition of $10,540 to the contract.
Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
carried unanimously, that the Willoughby Acres Water Improvements
Chang' Order '3 be approved.
Pa9. 48
~ ..,þ.J_~ __ ... ___....
.
.
'1,.
~
.......
IE
rœI
-..-
v ~"_W"ß
---""'''''''''''-''''''''-''*'''''-''"'''''''''~-'-'~'''''''.'-'
.
September 15, 1981
,
WILLOUGHBY ACRES SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CHANGE ORDER '2 - ^PPROVED
Utilities Managor Berzon explained Change Order '2 on the
Willoughby Acres sewer project which reflects additional driveway and
sod restoration work resulting from a newly constructed house and an
additional hydrant which was installed and jack and boring done. He
said the net increase of the project is $21,972.34. He said a public
hearing regarding the final assessment will be requested next week on
the Willoughby ^cres project.
Commissioner Brown movp.d, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and
carried unanimously, that the Willoughby ^crcs Sewer Improvements
Change Order '2 be approved.
&OaK 003 rACE 6 '1 ?
pag. U
--. ...-....._.
~ ... . ~ .
. '
.. .' .,.............---,.....
..----..-......,
....
"
l.:
. 4~
..-- "'-' -" ~ . ..
-- .þ',..~. .
Septemb~r 15, 1981
$40,980.68 CHECK REPRESENTING INTEREST FROM SHERIFF'S OPERATING ACCOUNT
- ACCEPTED TO BE PLACED IN GENERAL FUND
~puty Sheriff Barnett presented the Board with a check in the
amount of $40,980.68 which represents the interest from the Sheriff's
Operating Account to be placed in the General Fund.
Commissioner Brown moved, second cd by Commissioner Kruse and
carried unanimously, that the Board accept the $40,980.68 check
representing the interest from the Sheriff's Operating Account and that
it be placed in thc Gencral Fund.
RESOLUTION 81-207 AUTI10RIZTlJG COUNTY TO PAY FOR DEFENSE OF PRESENT AND
FORMER COUNTY OFFICTALS IN LAWSUITS - AùOPTED
County Attorney Pickworth explðincd a resolution he has drafted
which would autr?rlze the County to pay for defcnse of present and
former County officials by reason of their actions and scope of their
official duty in lawsuits. He briefly explained the need for defcnse
againzt lawsuits which ûre filed in Miami against County officials.
eommissioner Brown moved, second cd bj Commissioner Wenzel and
carried unanimously, that Resolution 81-207 authorizing the County to
pay for defcnse of present and former County officials in lawsuits be
adopted.
&oœ 065 PACE 7Ol3
Pa9. 50
.. ,.' -.,.... -
.
.
- -."
....._......'~._...
BOOK 063 rACE70bPtember 15, 1981
ROUTINE BILLS - PAID
Pursuant to Resolution aI-ISO adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners on May 26, 1981, the following checks were issued through
Friday, September 1, 19B1, in payment of routine bills:
FUND
CHECKS
AMOUNT
County Checks
$1,327,770.51
$ 252,836.59
12286 - 12570
BCC Payroll
28339
27824
BUDGET AMENDMENT 81-161 TRANSFERRING FUNDS TO PROVIDE FOR PURCHASE OF
WORD PROCESSING EQUIPMENT - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,644
Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
carried unanimously, that Budget Amendment 81-161 transferring funds to
provide for purchase of word processing equipment for the County
Manager's department be adopted in the amount of $9,644.
Pa9. 51
. .
~
cœ
~
...<~.. > :~. ....._~,. .r,., "')',At "'./f? J!T..,7..............-"""·-..-1I'''''''.·.".,_...,.--.'''-.....,......
'.
I.
t
&OOX O~ PACE70gptember 15, 1961
RESOLUTION 81-208 AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF TAX ANTICIPATION NOTE FOR
SEWER AREA "B", SOUTH HALF (EAST NAPLES) MUNIeIPAL SERVIeE TAXING AND
BENEFIT UNIT - ADOPTED
Following Chief Deputy Clerk/Fiscal Officer Hall's explanation,
Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by eommissioner Brown and carried
unanimously, that Resolution 81-208, authorizing iSDuance of a tax
anticipation note for Sewer Area "B", South Half (East Naples)
Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit, be adopted.
.
f
paq. 5~
.
.
:..~ .
,¡¡;;~~~:., ~
."~" ~
E~;':"~:·'
DEI
1-
',.
"
, ,
.'
"
~A'
,.
'í,J;:
-~..;.
.~
j
'f
,
.;
11
.1'
,r
.'
."
.~
, .
. . ~.. .
soptember 15, 1981
RESOLUTION 81-209 AUTHORIZING ISSUANeE OF REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE FOR
SPECIAL ROAD ASSESSMENTS FOR 1981 - ADOPTED
Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
carried unanimously, that Resolution 81-209, authorizing the issuance
of a revenue anticipation note for Special Road Assessments for 1981,
be adopted.
. .-
..
-
&Qœ 063 PACE 1j5
P.g. 53
.. ... - .'.. .--
-...-......- ....~. .~. -..-........ .
, "'." ---.~... ....." - ...........-,
.
-...._-~..._,._,.," ".. _. -'-"",,"'-";"'.,.-.
.", ~.._.,....~..~.
.
'.
-.-........
... -......-.-... -......-.- ....-"
Cøptcmbor IS, 1981
RESOLUTION 81-210 AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REVENUE ANTIeIPATION NOTE FOR
~ELLY ROAD WATER ASSESSMENT FUND OF 1981 - ADOPTED
Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by eomm1ss10ner arown and
carried unanimously, that Resolution 8l-210, authorizing issuance of
revenue anticipation note for Kelly Road Water Assessment Fund of 1981,
be adopted.
aoœ 063 PACE 7j ?
Pave 54
. .
. ,.
,.-..... " ~ ... - .........:'
-.-.. '-,.,-. .. .'. ..... ..,.. .-.
.
, ,
..' A I . ~ .. . .... _... . .
September 15, 19B1
PETITION CP-81-6C, ROBERT REED, RE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR
PROPERTY LOC~TED AT SW CORNER OF ~IRPORT ROAD , PINE RIDGE - TO aE
RECONSIDERED 9/29/ßl
Planner Terry Clark explained that on June 11, 1981, the Collier
County Planning Agency considored petition CP-81-6C, filed by Robert
Reed which requested D Comprehensive Plan Lðnd use element amendment
csidcntial medium-high density to commercial for a portion of
n 14, T49S, R25E, located at the SW corner of the intersection of
AirPQrt Road and pine Ridge on a parcel of land consisting of approxi-
I
mately 11.6 acres, and recommended approval. He said the developers
plan on submitting ~ PUD for 35 ðcres in the area, 11.6 of which will
be commercial.
In respons0 to a question by Commissioner Wenzel, Mr. Clark said
that the density will be reduced in the overall use of the property.
Commi!3!31oncr WiJ,H~r moved, seconded by Comml!3!doner Orown lmd carried
unanimously, that pctition CP-81-6C, filed by Robert Reed, be
reconsidered on September 29, 1901.
BOARD ACCEPTS TIGER TlIIL OEACII WHICH DELTONr, CORPORATION HAS GIVEN 1\S
FULFILLING TilE BEACH ACCESS REOUIREMENT
Community Development Director Virta showed several overlays
depicting the various proposed beach acccss points on Marco Island. Ho
explained that an ordlnl1nce adopted in '976 provided that beach access
points be provided every 1/2 mile along the Collier County coast from
Marco Island to tho Lee County line. He said when the beach access
ordinance was adopted, Mr. Jim·Vensel and representatives of Deltona
Corporation were present at the hearings and discussed the fact that
Deltona had dedicated Tiger Tail Beach and the residents beach and t~at
they felt they had more than met the criteria of the ordinance and they
felt they were exempt from the beach access ordinance.
wox 063 PACE 723
PA9. 55
if-
.. .-..............-..
;",;,
,
~_.. -------.....- n '
J . ;1 ~'"
, ,
,
I
~ _'" _ . . _ _. .. ....... . o.
~o:¡x 063 PAct 724-
September 15, 1981
Mr. Virta said that in 1978 Deltona Corporation returned to the
CAPC to get site development plan approval for the South Seas project
and that as a part of that project, staff asked that Deltona dedicate a
15 foot beach access within their site and at the CAPC hearing, Mr.
~ensel again made the argument that Deltona had more than met the beach
access requirements of the beach access ordinance. Mr. virta said that
staff at that time, as well as the CAPC, agreed with Mr. Vensel and
made a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners that the
South Seas project be approved as presented without any beach access
within the site. He said as a result of the Board approvi~g the South
Seas project, the staff made the assumption that it was the Board's
feeling and the CAPC's feeling that Deltona had met the requirements of
the beach access ordinance and that no further access points should be
r~~uired along the Marco Island beaches. He said this belief was held
until this summer, when Commissioner Wimer wrote a memorandum stating
he could not recall that the Board had ever waived beach access for
Marco Island and after Planner Lee Layne researched the records and she
could find no point at which the Board took action to waive the
requirements of the beach acceas orùinance as it relates to Marco
Island and De1tona Corporation's contribution.
Mr. Virta said th..t since then a building permit has been issued
for a project which is under construction and the Marco Marriott Beach
Hotel has applied for several permits. He said he had asked that the
permits not be issued. He explained that staff feels the beach access
ordinance must be administered and that there are three "triggering
mechanisms" for activating the ordinance, i.e. sUbdivision, rezoning
and build i"9 permits.
···*··Commissioner Wenzel left the room at 2:20 P.M....---
County Attorney Pickworth said that the first question would be to
~9. 56
~
..........
ŒJ
SiB
. 'n ~,,....... "P~~~JI~"""'. -,.-_,--... rJ l....JI la, -. ,",. -....¡ 70_",.1
1 A u_~ ~
.'.... J .~.
~-·.."'If·,....·,""'...··..·,·,,-·"'''''<,.,i,
Goptombor 15, 1981
I~tcide whether or not the Board has waived beach access requirements
i:~~r Deltona corporation. County Managcr Norman explained that the
~Màrco Marriott Hotel could provide a reasonable beach access in the
~", ~
form of a 10 to 15 foot walkway. He said the Gulfside project has
apparently entered into nn agre~ment with property across the street to
provide a 5 foot easement along the north line and a 4 foot sidewalk
with a fence is being constructed in order to provide access for some
of the landlocked condominiums to the east.
Commissioner pistor said he felt the Board should refer to the
pLragraph of the ordinance which makes provision for accumulating beach
accesses into one piece and that since Marco Island is about five miles
long' that would take 1000 fcet of area and tnat the 1/2 mile of beach
which has been dedicated would seem to meet that requirement.
Mr. Elbert D. Tripp, representing the Board of Directors of the
Marco Island Taxpayers ^ssociation, spoke in favor of beach access
being provided.
Mr. lIerb Savage asked that the Board excuse Marco Island from the
requirement of 100 feet every 1/2 mile for bcach access points.
Mr. George Vega and Mr. Al Edney, representing the Marriott Marco
Beach Hotel, requested that the building permits be issued for the
hotel. Mr. Vega said the hotel representativos would be glad to meet
with Deltona Corporation and the County officials to resolve tho beach
access needs.
Commissioner Wimer said he had no problems with issuing the
requested permits but said he would like to see the parties involved
work out the beach access needs.
Mr. Jim Vensel gave a detailed history of Deltona Corporation's
development on Marco Island and distributed the following information
which Commissioner Brown asked to be included in the minutes.
~O:)K
063 mE 72S
Page 57
,.
.
,..,
_...r.........
.. ...--..~._.~ ~_. -.-
.".... '__"_.'_"H'_'
~_.,~.,,--------~....,---,... --
-"'._~'.-.,,'-.
__.,_--'_-,,"~,
·t:"
. ,
. ,
tOOK 063 PACE 726
September 15, 1981
1j.
MAReo BE~CH FRONT USE
ORIGINAL OWNERSHIP
,~'
Little Marco Island
Marco Island
Rice Island
Helen Key
Total C)-,.mership
ALLOCATED USE
Location
Little Marco
Marco Island
County Park
Bayside Wa terway
Development
Residents Beach
Development
Kice Island
Helen Key
Miles
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT
3,981'
9,211'
13,192'
13,192'
2.50 miles
<36.2\>
1,000'
16,961'
l3,200'
5.290'
36,441'
6.90 mUes
RECREATION
1,000'
<100\>
2,619'
150'
1,000'
3.769'
<22.22\>
13,200'
<100\>
<100\>
5,280'
22,249'
4.40 miles
<63.8\>
6.9 ~1 x 2 x 100' ~ 1,380' Required by Ord. 76-20
Provided
Required
23,249'
1,3801
ON MAIN ISLAND ONLY
Prov ided
f Required
16,961 x 100 ·
2,640'
. 16.85 times as much as required
by Ord. 76-20
.
3,769'
1, 096 '
· 3.44 Times as much as
required by Ord.
76-20
*****Commissioner Wenzel returned to room at 2:45 P.M...*..*
,',
'.;1.,!.
~ t:
~t
¡
~.
if
,
~:f
~t
:;i
~. ~
:),
. ".
::.:,~.
Mr. Venael atated that Deltona Corporation agreed to provide
approximately 1/2 mile of beach to be given to the County for the use
.~
"
',<1
l c '~
.
.
¡
t
- .~ ...
..
........"" ,~ "I"""" _____..._ ,
-
. ,....-._"..~ .~------,..,..
.,~""----
.-
.'
-
Pðqe
September 15, 1981
of the general public and that the residents' beach not be closed until
such time a'Tiger Tail Beach was available to the public.
.
******Commissioner Kruse left the room at 2:50 P.M.******
l".!.
líVi
(: "::10-
~... '~
County, as plUt
Mr. Vensel described Delton~'s commitment to the DOT and eollier
of their contribution toward the toll bridge, that the
public beach, which is now Tiger Tail Bcach, would be immediately
d.'ded to the County, that the Corporation provided 154,000 cubic
f
of fill and other contributions. He said in 1978 Deltona provided
yards
4,000 yards of fill so the County could construct their initial parking
lot at Tiger Tail Beach. He explained that in 1976 when the beach
access ordinance was being considered, Deltona made a presentation and
it was the general opinion of the members of the Commission that
Deltona was not exempt from beach access ordinance but that the
Corporation was considered to have more than complied with the intent
of the beach access ordinance by deeding Tiger Tail and the residents'
beach to the County.
*****Commissioner Wenzel left the room at 2:53 P.M.......
·***·Commissioner Kruse returned to the room at 2:55 P.M......
Commissioner Brown mov~d that the Board accept Tiger Tail Beach
which Deltona Corporation has given as fulfilling the beach access
requirement in Ordinance 76-20.
Commissioner Wi~er noted that the residents' beach is a private
beach and Mr. Vensel said that any resident on Marco Island who pays
the due, used to maintain the beach can USe the beach. There was a
short d1.cussion regarding the parking spaces at Tiger Tail Beach.
Commiss"fner Wimer said he felt it would be a mistake to waive the
be~Ch aJless requirement from Deltona Corporation.
*.~JÞ...........eommiS8ion.r Wenzel returned to the room at 3:10 P.M......
"ii.... ,lckworth said that Deltona Corporation's conveyance to
, &OOK 063 PACE 711
Page 59
.
':"'- - -., ._~..'........- _.__...-~
.. ........- ....
063 PACE 7~~
September 15, 1981
~oo.~
does not do away with the beach access requirements.
Norman noted that the problem of allowing consolidation of
-access into one area does not allow people to walk to the beach,
~.,
anð!j¡Wd he felt the beach access ordinance does not provide a
un~fo~ burden to the privilege of owning property on the beach and
does not distinguish between the size of property involved and the
amount of obligation which people are expected to bear. He suggested
that the beach ordinance be modified so that all beachfront property
have an obligation to provide beach access. Commissioner Wimer noted
he felt the County was derelict if it does not set aside beach access
even if the land has to be purchased.
After further discussion, Commissioner Wenzel seconded Commis-
,
sioner Brown's motion to accept Tiger Tail Beach, which Deltona
Corporation has given, as fulfilling the beach access requirement. The
motion cùrried 3/2, with Commissioners Kruse and Wimer opposed.
THE POSITIoN OF ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISOR MADE A STAFF POSITION
~eommiSSioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and
w, J
cal ed unanimously, that the position of Environmental Advisor be made
a staff position and that the staff be authorized to hire a qualified
person.
,IMr. Ted Below, EAC Chairman, spoke regarding his desire to see an
¥
Environmental Advisor hired who has a doctorate in Environmental
Science in order for that person to be an expert witness for the County
if the need arises.
MESSRS. ROBERT M. COLE AND JOHN HENRY BOOM, SR. APPOINTED TO IMMOKALEE
PLANNING AGENCY
CommisBioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and
pag. 60
.
.
CII
IIIJ
iiiiI
,.1;;..,
"-,,, -~~. ",,--·_,-~~,,""''-_R·''<_'_'_~'·''··''·*_'-_''''"-';';'_"~_;'''h''''.,~,..._...._""_____
:;'...,..............
it '.
.',
t' '"
",,:',
·
~:" '. .
"f
: "~
I '.
"'. .
t-~
,
(
{
f
ì
f
t
i
of'
l
i
1.
!
"
\
t"
· t
f
.
· "',
},
¡
"
"
; ~
,~
~¡
I
~
1
I
...~
. 1":'~'~';
. .i. Þ-ooa
~ ...... .,
''''0 0 >
, ~'t04
't,,. . CJ .,
'~e CJ
~'M"
;::~~
'to4~c:
.c..,
'to4...c::
:§:a
:.s
..e't04
~.t:
":;3
.. :'8
o Q....
. Co
X., · .,
.......
..c::
.11.... ~
"'g~
!tIO~
....c::CJ
'-<........
.0.... .
~..':i,..
.......0
:I: Co '-<
,
~ ~.~: '.::",'
. ~."
September l5, 1981
-
:.; I ~ 1 ':. ~ ..; :' r .' .. ."'" .... , -
_'"_1".'...: :-;~". :. ~ ..... ,,:',..þ' c...··!·
carried unanimously, that."Iessr:s. Robert M. Cole and John Henrÿ-ãõõin, ......
.. .. :. ~.' -.. . -,.,.
- .... '.....
... -. .
Sr. be appointed to, the Immokaleep!an!1~ng Agency and that the subject
~ . ...... ..... '; ~. :.:, ~ ~: :'::': ?:. ~,...,. f p.
of ~n alternate be discussed at~. ;ater date.
.. -. .- .. :-: ~. - _ ". .. ': ~ -, :. :- ':.;' (: :-:-- :- !:....: .-,.... c ..
.: ,.....Commissi9,ne,r ~~nzel .left the room at 3:30 P.M.······- ------.
... _, .. 0"
_. .. - .. . .. - - ,," .. .' . :. ': :.:. - - :-:. - :. :." -::-!.. :':". t
MR. JOHN P. CARDILLO 1\PPOINTED ~s E-,C ALTERNATE AND MR. FRANK EDWARD'S
AS FULL MEMBER TO EAC ,._, -, . '.,....,
.. ... .. .
commlssio~r Brown moved, seconded 'öy 'Commtssloner ,Wimer I!n..d.: ,.';:'
~
carried 4/0, with Commissloner'wenzei a6~~~t, t~~E'Mi~:John p~:C~r~illo
be appointed as an alternate to'the ~Ac ~nd:Mt;;Frank Edwards_b~,m~~e..!~.
full member to the EAC.
": ~ - .. .~ . . :
- ,. ':' - ~-
-..". ...
. ,
\-.... f·... ::. .; :. ~ ~ : :
- .. .. . - . - ,. - .. .
"** .;'c~~ml as i 0 ndB'ro~~ î bÚ . the: rooÎnc. '0 1::3': 3~~ P;' M:. U. ~ ~~ ~:! -:.:.~, ~~:
. . -..' .
.. .. .. : ~ : ".:' ~ ~ ~ : .:- :-! ::' ::'';' : : ~~... : : ~ :... .........
CHAIRMJl.N AUTHORIZED TO SIGN CERTIFICATES FOR COhRECTION TO THE-''Í''AX ROLL
. - .-. .. .. ". -: : :. ~: ::-=
I
I
I
!
'Comml ssloner .Kruse moved, scco.nd.e:d by. c,o.mm.ls.s.loner Wimer and
_. . ~. .. - ... -. '. :.' ~.'.;. :.:-: o! ... ..
carried 3/0, with Commlss.ioncrs Brown and ~enze1.absent, that the' --.
... ~: z ... : ::':-. .....: .
Chairman be authorlzed to sign the following Certiflcates for
. . .... ..
.. ; ..... !. : . -
Correction to the Ta~ Roll:
{ .:. ...-
.... ... - ..
: . .,.. ...- ," ~ ,. 1
_I,. TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY
NUMBER
'{ EA R
DATE
..~-
, .
: ~ ! :
, ". '.1980-161-163
. 1980
~(1~/81
!~::':!
- '''0....
.. -.. .. .. - ... ... .
EXTRA GAIN TIME FOR INMATES NO. 34501, NO. 37373, AND NO. 32395 -
^PPROVED ^S REQUESTED BY SHERIFF ROGERS
.. - - .... - .
~',: Commissioner Kruse mO\l.cd., 8~~con,dcdbx. .c~~mis.~i_o.ner Wimer an'd"
~. ~ - . - .. ... 't
carried 3/0, with Commissioners Brown and Wenzel absent, that 'Extra·
. r. . .. ...
. .. - .. ..:...... : : :- ~~. :-'. ,...
Gain Time be approved for Inmates No. 34501, No. 37373, å~ð·Ño;·!32395,
... - ... ::. . . E .: :- ~ ~ ~ 1..: :- ~ ; t : : .:. ~: ~t! =. .
a.- requested by Sheriff Rog."rs~ .. ' .
.. ... .. -. .... ..... .....: '..:..: :.~~ t. ~: E-;! I:: ~: \...~ ':'.:~ :':.1.
:-í!:: ~-:--.... .' ....-.:-. ___. ...,
LEAVE OF ABSENCE REQUESTED' BY JÓHÑ~ H~ SALLE- FROM' 8/31/81 TO 11/31/81 -
APPROVED
.. ....._..:.: '.~' .. t, ....._..
Commissioner i\rµ;8e moved" seconded by Commissioner' Wh,'ei- ånd
. . ',".', ~. ..: - ~ . ... :. ~ : : - '.-:- =-:-.',. ~. ... ':" - r
c.rrieð 3/0, with eommissioners Brown.and Wen~.~ obsent, that John H.
a~" O~iPA~£7i.~··
19::,.. &
Peg. '61
.;
,-",,"--
.-"".....,-.... .._.....~........
.....n ._.._... ........___.~_...
_.""""""",-".,.,,-
."".__ ............ ,~,.____'v,
Biological Assessment be accepted for the record.
, 80DK 063tCE.73t> September 15, 1981
Salle.be granted a leave of absent from the Road and Bridge Department
8/31/81 through 11/31/81 a8 recommended by George Archibald and eounty
Manager Norman.
BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR R~PRAP REVETMENT, eOLLIER MARINE, INe. FILE
NO. 11-45099-5E - ACCEPTED "
Administrative Aide to the Board Grace Spaulding read the
BiOlOgiCal~~essment for riprap revetment for Collier Marine, Inc.
Flle No. ll~99-5E.
.
Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and
.
carried 3/2, with Commissioners Brown and Wenzel absent, that the above
,
,
I
t
J,.
'.
h~ It' ~
,
'page '2
, .
.
··".:,ß'~.::....:,
,"':, . .....' ','
t;'\:'
.' ':~,~_:
::~,
..
.
.
"fÞ"';:,;
',"#' ......-:
\ ,.,;' .
...
4""
.'i1ì; .
,.iil......·.'..';.·
.'. .~'...
..
....'" ..--....-.~.. .--.
-'" -'.. ....,.,-.~--_..,....
....~..··......'~~,,_,."",,·,'·""'^.4."'·"-,'..,·~___
--.--"-.
,~,...
,
I
.. tJ ~ .....
BOOK 063 PACE 731
September 15, 1981
. ,~
CHAIRMAN AUTHORIZED TO SIGN BOND RELl\TING TO TIIF: COMMISSION OF MR.
HOMER BETANCOURT AS A MEMBER OF THE BOl\RD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE
IMMOKAtEE WATER/SEWER DISTRICT
. '
Commissioner Kruse moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and
carried 3/2, with Commissioners Brown and Wenzel absent~ that the
_. ~ --..------------- ----~---
ehairman be authorized to sign the Bond relðting to the commission of
Mr. Homer Betancourt as a member of the Board of Commissioners of.the
Immokalee Water/Sewer District.
. -
, -
" : :.. ~
Page 63
. "'....... --, ..
'~"""
~
c::=¡
F·,'"\",çv-;1
-'
.
IT" ~,_
--.-...--.. ,,,...-~ -. .-,..... ~...-....~,.......-.. .
'-=or--
ßOOK 063 PAGE 73'~
September 15, 1981
MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE - FILED AND/OR RP.FERRED
There being no objection, the Chair directed the following
correspondence be filed and/or referred to the various departments as
lnd1cat~d 1
1. Letter dated 9/8/81 from William K. Fowler, DOT,
enclosing a complete schedule for the design,
right-of-way acquisition and construction of SR 951. xc
Mr. Barksdale, Mr. Norman and filed.
2. Copy of letter dated ~/8/8l from John B. Cechman to
Sheriff Rogers ðS notice of pending claim by Bnrbarð
Ursin against Aubrey Rogers as Sheriff of Collier
County. xc L. D. Robinson, Mr. pickworth and filed.
3. Letter dated 9/3/81 conveying Ochopec Fire Control
District Advisory Committee minutes for 9/2/81. xc Mr.
Norman and filed.
4. Copy of minutes of regular meeting of Naples City
Council for 8/19/81. Filed.
5. Copy of letter dated 9/9/81 from Attorney General Jim
Smith which is a response to Jacob D. Yarn's request for
an opinion on "What is the proper disposition of excess
funds in th.. Mr1rr:o Island Toll racllity Investment
account held by the State Board of Administration?" xc
Mr. Norman, Mr. [)¿uksdale ðnd filed.
6 . Pe tit ion r e c e i v e d 9/ 1 4,' 8 1 wit h 2 fi s i 9 n a t u res 0 f
residents in the area of "Green Tree Center" (SW corner
of Immokalee & Airport Road) requesting that the BCC
vote in tavor of the proposed shopping center. xc Mr.
Virta and filed.
7. Letter dated 9/3/81 [rom Willard F. Schade requesting
information on the various connection charges in
Willoughby Acres and the manner in which he mðy handle
this by mail. xc Mr. Berzon and filed.
8. Memorandum dated 9/2/81 regðrding changes in Department
of the Interior Rules regulating OCS Exploration and
Development from State/Lvcal ÙCS Program. xc Mr.
Norman, Mr. Virta and filed.
9. Copy of letter dated 9/8/81 to Mrs. Victoria Livingston
from C. William Norman in response to her letter of
9/1/81 commending Mr. Kehoe and Mrs. Janie Butts for
their dedication and faithfulness in helping to
straighten out her problem in receiving widow's
benefits. Filed.
10. Copy of amendment of Rule 25-17.51, P.A.C., Definitions
page 64
~
........
c:=J
c::J
,..""
September 15, 1981
of "Conservation Meðsures", Docket No. 810242-EU, Order
No. 10270. Filed.
11. Copy of amendment of Rule 25-6.15, F.A.C. Location and
Preservation of Records, and Rule 25-7.15, Location and
Preservation of Records, Docket No. 810250-PU, Order No.
10269. Filed.
12. Copy of Public Servicc COMmission Docket No. 780723-TP,
Order no. 10274 re extended area service between Estero
and Fort Myers and betwecn Bonitð Springs and Little
Hickory Shores to Naples. Filed.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
There being no further business for the good of the County, the
meeting was adjourncd by order of the Chair - Time: 3:45 P.M.
BO^RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL
\\ l, A ^..
DI STR leTS UN DER
I '
/if ~L, .~ 1
~S'1'UH,
I
ITS CONTROL
------
or ---t
'.1 {/ !q
CHA i ImAt~,
. t"
&OVK 063 rACE 73'>
Pig. 65