The URL can be used to link to this page

BCC Minutes 08/25/1981 R ''',' ;'48'" ~. ,..,. ,'¡'-~""''''':''.'' ' .,,', ,;" ..,' ' , ., ':""1 ',', . .. ." . ,. \.." .,.- 'If.' . ~"~~".r " ... ..... . '/ ,..,." "wt,,·,· "'....J; ,;.,·';'JI·'\'ì1;.f'{t';""," .. 'i' W....·, ,~'~--:-,"'. ~"."....~';;:''';1-,~~.:". . " "'~. t'. .::. .~t:·"~"::·:::'."':~:;;1-~~ J ~"'I""" .,.'.-..,.......~." ....¡Jt..i".r~·'~' ", ~ . 'ljj'~:~_ " , , \ \ ~ ¡ I I'. r , I ! \ I I I . , . I I \ ) I ~ If , ¡ Napl.., Florida, ~U9UBt 25, ,w ,. LIT IT 81 REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commis.ionera In and for the COunty of Collier, and al.o acting a. the governing board (a) of .uch .peclal di.tricts a. have been created according lav and having conducted bu.ine.. herein, ~et on this date at 9.00 A.M. , In R89ular Se.sion in Building -P- of the Courthou.e Complex with the following member. pre.entl CH~IRM~NI John~. Piator VICE-CHAIRMAN. Clifford Wenzel C.R. -Ru..- Wimer Mary-Frances ~ru.e Dav Id C. Brown ~LSO PRESENTI William J. ~~ag.n, Clerk, Elinor M. Skinner and Darlene Davidson (2138 P.M.) Deputy Clerka, Donald pickworth, County Attorney, Ken Cuyler, Aaaiatant County Attorney, Irving Beraon, Utilities Manager, C. William Norman, County Manager, Terry Virta, Community Development Administrator, Lee Layne, Planner, Jeffory Perry, Zoning Director, Clifford Barksðale, Public Works ~~ini.trator, Or ace Spaulding, Admini.trative Aiðe to the Board, and, Deputy Chief Ray Barnett, Sheriff'. Department. ... 800. 063 rACE 171 P.~. 1 . ' .< .,~.~:;".'~ . .. 1.. if II' ...;..",.¡,;J.,..... .... '" '. ,. ., .~,:, (-~ t ,.. .. ,'!\' ",; ,', ~.. -.. ~" . ". ~' I' ,'. .' ) . , , ,; . ,......,'..... . to,_" . ": t'" , . , l't·"'~tÞJ..r,';""''''-:''': . .~t.~' .:.....J:~'. ~..'.,.! ''''~', . .~~,..':"""",. .~.. ~. ':' '.', .......... . , "'..........--............... ....- ,. .. ...... ..... - .' ,'~';\:;..\./,: '. "'46 .." "''''~' . , ". " ... ..).' .....·iI,.. # .... " - ^'t~" \ .,'... ;..;.1 \ ~ /~....~...~.;~...þ -. ~ ~;:' .T/f~"'~.~, " ......... .' ......,...,. ~". v......,. ....~ ........)).'. ..¡,;.~...... -.. .. .- ,~" .~1¡.,..~ . ..1'; ~.) ~ " ", / " "':,:""');:::>:~~ .-:..._.:.-.-Þ______----:.íiii#. ..'.'0#-...._,...........,,_,...,.,.,.. '.t I",,: ~: .\: :: _ I:" .;?Í"'~"". . ¡¡'. . .... . ... 'I. .. t " . . , .'J¡t,....l<!¡""'.., , . . \ ,," ".",:'. ' ..-_.'..:---~ )fr·-;· : '.-' ~~' '. \OOx 063 PACE176 ~ugust 25, 1981 4c'-, . ,,:.' ,'r' , . , i:~..' ;~' ~; carried unanimously, that the agonda be approved with the following ,:tiJ ., "- deletion. and additionsl ,l't ~GEND~ - ~PPROVED WITH DELETIONS AND ADDITIONS . ....., Commi..ioner Werl%ol moved, seconded by Commissioner ~ruse and l. . .. , .. 2. 3. 4. Item 8 B, Petition CP-8l-12C, until 9/15/81 at petitionèr's Item 11 A-2, Utility Eðsement - continued two weeks. Discussion re public hearing BCC, 14 B. Diøcusslon re appointment of Committee - added to BCC, 14 Henry M. Minster - continued request. re Coon ~ey Pas. Fishing Villas re smoking ordinance - added to Marco Islanð Beautification C. MINUTES OF AUOUST 4, 1981 ~PPROVED ~S PRESENTED Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner ~ruse and carried unani~ou.ly, that the minutes of August 4, 1981 ~eeting be approved as presented. PRESENTATION OF EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS TO JANIE BUTTS, (10 YE~RS) ~ND PHYLLIS DUPREE (5 YEARS) Chair~an Pistor presented the following Ðftployee Service Awards and congratulated the recipient.. . , I ! . Janie Butt. PhylU. Dupree 10 years S years PROPOSAL TO ADOPT A NEW OCCUP~TIONAL LICENSE ORDIN~NCE - CONTINUED FOR A WOR~SROP ON 8/26/81 ~ND ITEM TO BE RETURNED FOR DECISION ON 9/1/81 Leg8l notice having been publi.hed In the Naple. Dally News on ~U9u.t 6, 1981, a. evidenced by Affidavit of publication filed with the Clerk, the public h.8ring for a propo.al to adopt a new occupational license ordinance wa. opened. County Manager Nor.an explained that the propo.al pre.ented r~.rdtng a new O¢cup6tlGnal Ltc:~:c Orð!nenc9 ,- ba.tcally an ..end- .. .. >.---....." '!.'f'~~"'" ..~.'" .". ',.. ,'.;"",..;,.,;.' ,........... ." t 1\'.yo:!"I;.......,,<"'t'C¥¡.:'"'1" t, ' ',:>,t..(1'... \ 'iT"( ~,d:' .. r'^'::_~~r.¡' r' '.' ' I. ,4;; , :' .r~J=ff. .'",,'. 1Iit...·~J I '.,. . '\ i';.):.. 'I."'''' ,.-1' ~ .' .,.~~Þ¡-i1~:""'F... ., !.\'( ~'" '~ tf\:~~-6~h-r·~ ' " \"- ..~~ ~',. ., . " ,..---" ......,.. . '" "}. - ....."",.... ~~. .,' ~, ,.'.~ . .L- ? {I" '. AU9ust '. .. , .ent to an existing ordinance and he said that this wa. reco..ended as part of his budget me..age to the Board, since the fe.. eatabllshed in the Occupational License Tax system of the County have not been changed for ten years. He said he thought the charges should be brought Into line with fees charged elsewhere as an essential part of the County'. revenue system and not just to h~lp the Tax Collector offset the cost of collecting the tax. In response to Chairman Pistor's question, Mr. Norman said that the Tax Collector and County Attorney had developed the proposal. Assistant County Attorney ~.n Cuyler said he wrote the additions and deletions to the Ordinances and, in response to Commis.ioner Wenzel, he *ald that the majority of the ordinance i. simply an increase in fee. and that the manner in which the fees were handled in the past would be the way they are handled in the future. Commissioner Wenzel said he wanted to make sure that the small business person did not pay as much as the business person who does a million dollars or more worth of business. Mr. Norman stated that last year th~ Legislature established limits on how much occupational license fees could be Increas~ and that because of the limits of 100' tor fees under $100, etc., that the inequities which existed in the prior ordinance can not really ba corrected at this time. CoM~la.loner Brown asked what a huckster would pay and Supervisor of Occupational Licen.e. Mr. Roe.toriff explained he would need a peddler's license for $5.00 and there would also need to be . retail . license to sell the produce which would be $30.00 under the proposed ordinance. 8001( 063 fACE 11/ '8ge 3 ~' . ::~..' ------.--..... ~-----.,...............-- --- -- ----~..... ---- " ' . , ... ~. :-.. : . 'I ~,.' ,.,I .~..... .:~.:t!,t'. '~j"':r~ . ,,;~:.,~,~\' .................... --""..:... ___ --ø-.-...... ___..... --' --' __ ..... ~ ..... ............... - ~ ...., -...'........ ............... ...... ---.... ...,ø - ~ , ,,:þ'.;~':ti ,-,7.::; , ;,.,,;", .r, .,~~.,: : ' "-::'110 '!'~' .. . - .. , . . . . . . . . . \001 0 b"3 PAtE 178 ~ugust 25, 1981 :; tf,. t' ~~. .:.t;: '-r: ,,' Commie.ion.r Kr~ee .aid that several of the fee. were bas.û on . population and that in the proposed ordinance a large number were .wltched from population to a flat rate but several were left on population, 1.e. movie theaters, sewago disposals and she .sked why all the It.m. were not switched. Mr. Cuylor Baid that the basic difference was that In some of the delineations in County populations, the ~aXiDu. had been r.ach.d and the City populations were left because ot the various municipalities within the County. Commissioner Kruse .ald that under the .lectric utilities ðnd telephone service, those were switched to flat fees and franchises wero exempted, but the water company and ..wage di.posal does not address the ones which are franchls.. and .he .aid th.re were inconsistencies between the two types. She said the j sam. rationale is not used in all cases. She a.ked, for .xample, it a .', per.on had four different quarry sites, would four diff.r.nt permits be ne.ded and ~r. Roe.toriff said that if th.y were und.r the .~De corporation, the f.e would be based on the number of .mploye.. a company had for the whole business but in the cas. of a r..taurant each .....' .) location i. licensed separately. Commi.sioner ~ru.e .aid .he did not ( "~ .. .' f.el there was fairness b.tw..n differ.nt types of busln....., becau.e ..-: ..' r i In one type of busine.s a per.on pay. by .ite but In anoth.r type of bu.lne.. a per.on pay. by the number of employee.. Chalr~an Pistor said that in the propo..d ordinanc. in .any ca.e. the ~ax Collector would decide whether a per.on get. a llc4n.e or not. Be read fro. the propo.ed ordinance and Hr. ~oe.torlff ..Id the .erbag. v.. fr~ the State Statute.. Chair.an PI.tor a.kld what if the eoar4 decided it doe. not want to givo the licen.e and Mr. Roe.torlff ..id be have an an.ver for that. ~ · .. ,. · ~ · ~-, i ~ t' 'I,. t ). ;-1 ~. ~J.....t. '~:;~'l ,11.._ , , . ,~., . '>,' r' l " ~: . .. ';< ~ugust ." ~. .... 4" . (,- ~ t..¡¡ Chairman pi.tor again read from the proposed ordinance ancS said" -~,:\,'' ~-,;>,',';:.,~~'" that .o~e of the items fall under the Zoning Department's jur1sd iëtion.':',·:f~~ .1<-, /:..:~\~ t", The sub1ect of grandfathering .ome of the firms was discus..e! ancS Mr';?~,,\ . .. .' ....:.'" I¡;,t,.,,' ~... :::::::: ::a: ::::::: ::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::n~: ·';1 ane! Health Departments and other areas which a person has to have ",~. .:~¡. co.pleted before a licen.e would be Issued and that this is done on .~ ',.'~~ renewal. and transfers. ~~ Mr. Cuyler said that the licenses are a privilege to engage in whatever business Q person applies for and it does not preempt any other departments of the County, since the applic~nt has to co~ply witb each department as they would Zoning, Building, etc. Mr. Norman said that there had been a great amount of improvement during the past year between the Tax Collector's Department and the Building and Zoining Departm~nts and that the kind of information being developed and vigor with which the departments have enforced the Occupational License Ordinance has been a great help. He .ald more work need. to be done to integrate and provide rapid co~unlcatlon of the information which can be done when the computer programs are develope" . After continued discu.sion, Commissioner ~ruse said she felt that continuity was lacking between some of the sections and that there were too ~any ambiguities. Commissioner Wenzel moved, .econded by Conmi.- sioner Kruse, to continue the Occupational Licens. Ordinance discu..ion and have a workshop on ~ugust 26, 1981 and bring the ite. back for .' . I· j . .~ .... '-'1 .;, Page:' aoCÄ 063 PACE 179 " , , , . r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ . . '. 'ú»' "'~".." ..- , .' , .. ·r<:I~ . \' . ..' . ',', .'~'" -" . ...., ~. ; ~~.iJIJl~~_......_~--~-----';"'-' It ';, . . k aoox 063 PACE 180 . . 1,,/,), " ,'Ii ~e~i.lon September 1, 1981. . '~tÞ-- pa..ed unan imouBl y. .;t ; Chairman Pistor asked Mr. ¡ r.. \\ I .: ¡ I ¡ I ! I I· I i ~ .. August 25, 1981 Upon call for the question, the motion Roestorlff to remove the section on telephone. from either .ection 23 or section 40. Mr. Norman .uggested that the ~~mmi.sioners give the copies of the ordinances on which they have ~ade notes to Mr. Roestoriff. RESOLUTION 81-188 RE PETITION CCCL-8l-3C, THE SUMMIT HOUSE ~ND ROY~L SE~rARER CONDOMINIUMS, MARCO, SEASIDE, INC. REOUESTINO A VARI~NCE AS TO PENCI, DUNES AND BO^RDW^LK LYING IN SECTIONS 17 AND 18, T528, R26! - ADOPTED BY 3 MOTIONS, BOARD APPROVED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION PENCE, CREATION OF ~RTIFICIAL DUNES AND GRADING, AND CONSTRUCTION OF WOODEN BOARDWALK Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on August 9, 1981, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing re Petition CCCL-81-3C, filed by The Summit House and Royal Seafarer Condominiums, Marco, Seaside, Inc., requesting variance as to fence, dunes and boardwalk lying in Sections 17 and 18, T52S, R26! was opened. Co.munlty Development Director virta explained that Petition CCCL-81-3C is a request f~r The Summit Rouse and Royal Seafarer Condo- .iniu.. by o.ltona Corporation for a variance to the Coa.tal Construc- tion Control Line for the construction of a temporary construction tence, to create an artificial dune to qrade and restore the existing dun. field, and to construct a wooden boardwalk. Re .ald that Prof...or Beln reviewed the petition and ilia de a field check of the .It. which revealed that the construction fence had already been j., ' 1 .,\~. constructed. have r.~o..ended approval of the variance but that due to the fact that i.-.f,i ': " ~ the fence wa. already In existence, h. could not .ake . poa1tlve ..i,., . i>' . .rec...ndatlon. "r. Vlrta said that Profe..or Bein indicated he would ., ~' . ' ,,' , , I',; ! ¡,¡ 1.', t ~: ! ;) ~. ~, .. ~t~ .iif~. f:; ~ I, l . , . . \ . August 25, Chairman Pistor said he has received continuous complaints trOM peoplo Who walk the beach about obstructions which are placed on the , beach and that he could not see w~y a f~nce ~hould b. put before the Setback Line. Mr. Virta said that the developer has built virtually on the Setback Line and that in order to secure the site to protect the public, the fence had to be put seaward but he pointed out that the fence was constructed without Board approval. Mr. Robert Motchkavitz, Director of Environmental Service. for Deltona Corporation, explained he was the permit agent on the applica- tion and that the fence is 1751 from the mean highwater line. He .ald that a ~istakel was made and identified late last year by DNR in.pector. 'j ')0',( and that De1tona acknowledged the mis~ake. He said that Deltona has been attempting to program a solution and work with the DNR to remedy the 8ituatiÓn and that in the course of the company's inspection, It was discovered that there had been disruption of the dunes vegetation on the beach by traffic from construction vehicles from another project not owned by Deltona and that, in acknowledgment of Deltonal. placement of the fence without obtaining proper approval, Deltona has agreed to "t~ ~'i/'i '... :1 restore to a natural condition all the aroas which the company has disturbed by its construction activities in addition to all other areas that were di.turbed by construction activilies of others and have \ propo.ed a plan of restoration to the State Which is acceptable to the -: + ~ .' staff. He explained that De1tona is asking for permission· to leave a temporary construction fence, composed of 4W by 4W wire mesh and wooden piles approximatoly 10' on centers, which extends for a distance acro.. the two construction sites with the southern most distance im.ediateIy 800K Ob'3,ACE 18t Page 7 ..,....,.. .... -- ......,.,. ...........~ .-..".......,-....., ~ .-.....-.~ ....... .... --- ............... .- ... ............ ,.,.. ..... ... . . , ,. " ~.. the fence and all areas on the dune face with a planting program acceptable to the State and the County. Mr. Motchkavitz said after makin~ restoration activities in the dune .yst.m, Deltona is also asking for permission to construct board- walk. acro.. those dunes .0 that they will nnt, in the future, be da~aged by pedestrian activities. Ho explained that Deltona had ~' apologized for tho activities which occurred without permits and that . ii ~...¡ " t ,~ .,l i ':' ì:' 'J ,r' " . '., ~.."" .t." . ,,... .. ..,. . . . -... . .... ., . ", ',. 1 . "', .:, ;. .. . , . , _-.i'-i.....---....,,------- d';... ... ," & .". . .. :-.... .... l' .' '\ "~~ '"" .~ ^ ,"<t';" !.' ~ ';1".,,', ,," ~.(.\'.'t 'it r:;' '. ':.("..,,- .... "" l#r¡~~~ .' . , , .'¡ ... ~}( , .~.' ..... August 25, 1981 'oaK Ob'3 PAtE 182 north of the Marco Beach Hotel, In place until the construction i. , co_plated at Which time Deltona will make complete restoration behind . . . . , " <, the company was in error and he hopes the requests would be approved. Ho .aid that company internal changes have been ~ade to se. that Much practIces do not occur In the future. ~r. Motchkavitz showed the Commissioners pictures of the ar.a showing the location of the fence and the area of the disruptions of the dune area which D~ltona Corporation proposes to restore. I Mr. Motchkavitz sai~ that the propo.al has been approved by the ~ Stat. and the company has been directed to obtain local approval. County Attorney pickworth asked for clarification re9ard1ng '\ \ . , Professor Bein'. approval and Mr. vlrta said that Profes.or Bein ,.{~.:;~., ."" indicated he would have recomlnended approval if the co.pany had not / . built the fence without permission. Re said that, becau.e procedur.. l' were not properly followed, It i. the staff's roco~.ndation that the Board not approved the petition. Mr. pickworth a.k.d if the recoa..ndation were to be based solely on the ~erit. of what th.y ....,.ft \ request if Prof.ssor B.in would not recommend ag8in.t the petltton and '.. that was correct. - Mr. PIckworth .sked if th.r........ an per.lt charge {or..ltuations lik. thi. and Mr. vlrta '.. ~r. Vlrta .ald ,~ .ft.r-tbe-fact ·'1 '.,. . . to'.r ," _ . , .aid [-Ño- . , , . " , . ',- >, >_.~..' .: " .,," ,~. ..,:" " "~Ý~""å:t~·;¡" .;i.;<\ .'¡,1\.~. ':L...~,"'~~'U\:' " . ,t, ;J.; ~'\',.~... ,.', :"I'''.~ ~ I" " . . ·\\.....1 ~!,"" . ,,, ".....,. AU<Just 25,' 1981,?·ót . . ~ ' . . \,". '..f· , , . ... ...,.....~ Mr. pickworth askeð if'the Intent of the fence WðS safety and Mr. . .,...,. .......... I r"otchkavitz answered affirmatively. In responso to Commissioner ," Wenzel, Mr. Motchkavitz said the c~pany keeps a twenty-four hour vatch . . . at the .ite and that one of the OSHA regulations I. that a rence 1. required around a building site. In respon.e to Chairman pi.tor, Mr. Virta .ald that typically a con.tructlon fenc~ I. not a separate permit Item. Commissioner ~ruse .ald she felt too many Items were combined In one item, I.e. boardwalk, fence and dune restoration. Chairman plstor agreed. Mr. Pickworth said he felt the Commissioners should consider the petition on the merits of what the company wants to do and not on the . fa~t that it did not ask before the fence was built. After a short dlscus.ion, Mr. Hotchkavitz said that Deltona cannot , do any work on the beach until Board approval is obtained whether DNR requires that the work be done or not. He explained that the company would like the Board to consider the three Items as one. In respons. to Commissioner Wimer, Mr. Motchkavitz said there would be no rock ., placed on the beach but rather clean, granular sand and vegetation ,. approved by the DNR. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commi..ioner Wenzel, and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner Wimer observed that when someone admits he has .ade a .' .i.take he feel. kindly toward that Individual. Commissioner Wi..r moved, secorlded by Commissioner Brown and carded, 3/2, with Commissioners Wenzel and ~ruse opposed, that Resolution 81-188, approving the construction of the temporary fence, be adopted. Co..issloner Wimer ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel anð Jarrled unanimously, that Resolution 8l-188, approvl~9 the creation o~ . " aoox Ob'3 fAtE183 P89. t ..........__,~,.~.-~~.....~~.--.,-..-"......,,~~~I)iI:~ ...~ . . . .'" ,', ..'"",~~·..~'~~··...,,.·.-"'I·".'... , . . . .'~ .. " .,:<, ,,),,;.\~.. ", ~~~' . . . . '........... ,1it, . .,,;,' ,.., :.·t'K.., " ~ .'~ . ...'J,} . .. . ~'i. ':-#,' , I:, > ,\ ", , '..r..:..£c. ' f' , , . , ~;';.i';,,:i;;""'''::r\;j¡: "./:}' ·t"i~,~..::. '.,~"': .... I .' ""'," ,." ... f,·,";I.'. ' ," I ...' ," " .. ./' .. '" ..., ., ',' ' .. . .., ~ :. . ' ..:"""" "'" '... '01" ~,~ ....,;',. ".,.'. '".J.. - I ~·,',I. ' . ' ",' --'_:.:....-".......-...~.....'*"""""'~- 'í¡!..... ¡ fji./ " . ~!tl~~âl'; :;~,;, J " \cœ . oas rAt£1B4 ::;~ ','1' \~: ..: .;0" . '-.. .. t,~ ~ ~ -....... 1t',',.i~:.~tU.cIal dun.. anef'the raetoratlon ofaxhtlng dune Ueld, be .' _dopted. ~.. r ~ :#t',: i ~ eo_l.a!oner Wimer moved, seconded by C01lllllha1oner Wenzel and . c~rrled unanl~ou.ly, that Resolution 8l-l88, approving the conltructlon of the wooden boardwalk over the dune area, be adopted. ,'.... ^ugust 25, 1981 't.h t. ,I' -"','.."'__u._.._....._"'."'..._....·____......_..'-· ,.M,~.'"--....,_<~._;,"'_.;"'....."'__~....__><"_·"·~...,»·^ . '~:~, \ :'OCl 063 PAtE 186 ':, ...... - ., ,. ",," .' ~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~ ", '\ August 25, 1981 ORDINANCE NO. 8l-40 RE PETITION R-8l-8-C, WHISPERING PINES, INC. . (-', REQUESTING REZONINO FROM -RM-l-, -RM-lST-, -~M-2-, -RM-2ST-, ·OC·, ~ND -GC-S" TO PUD FOR 330 ~CRES KNOWN AS FISHERM~N'S COVE LOCATED WEST or KELLY RO~D - APPROVED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on , ~uly 24, 1981, as evidenced by the Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition R-Bl-8-Cr filed by Whispering Pines, Inc., requesting rezoning from -RM-l-, -AM-1ST-, -RM-2-, -RM-2ST-, -OC-, and -GC-ST- to -PUD- for 330 acres . ~ known as Fisherman's Cove located west of Kelly Road. planner Lee Layne located the property in Petition R-81-S-C on an overhead map as being on the west aide of Kelly Road and the east side of Naples Bay, north of Thomasson Drive. She explained that this rezoning is basically a cleanup from the rezoning of 1980 when the , petitioner was given approval for 749 units with œaxlmum height of three stories, and that a portion of the rezoning was in the City and the develnper agreed to ~ove two golf holes into the County are. plu~ agreed to qo to zoning that would limit the -RM-2- area to three-story height limit. She noted that this action took away aoœe of the existing -RM-1- area, the -RM-2- being reduced a number of units furthor and that the density was approximately 2.63 unit. per .cre. She said that based on these facts and with the stipulations that the Board ~ade, the Planning Depart~ent felt that the -PUD- would b. better &onin9. She said there was one stipulation at the Planning co..l.slon he.rlng to revers. the golf hole~ in the lake are. and switch that wltb th. .evage treatment plant and t~at the sewage treatœent pl.nt Is now located near the road .re. and .w.y from .ny re.ldentl.l .r.... Ma. on that stlpul.tlon, the Pl.nnlng CO..lsston Petition R-Il-I-C. ~~t~~ . ( ~ ""; ,I, ,'. '''~ .',.. ' f'.' ·,··,.t ,,4!.!,~~ .., '.II ., .. . .I.~~~ 1,." ',.d; . .... J ;..c:-....... ,", ¿: ,.,' ~) .,,', ..... ;t'~ "'1 f#.::tI 4 If'" ........ /ò ,......'!Io..." . .' ';".~ " II! , :. ;'a. + ~ .. -' .' " .I'~ ~ .~. . '. ~ ~"'-_.', ,..",.,.......""-";"._""'--=-,...,----."""".-....-...-,.,....""""..,................,.,..,,.;..." .""",."".".",~,,. ,~.,.,~,_......,,_..._----'"~._"""~..;-- '~;~) ,.Jf pet.itioner, stated t.hat the developer is C'oopcratlnq with the County '-~~~~~. ~- ~:_~;:~~fi:~t '::;;;,':~,K Utilities Department and he intends to install a force main out to \. j' ~ - ,.\..: r j... .'.. ..... ' , 1 .. ,; .~.... " ' ";: . . , ..,: .-~. ~U9ust I ~ . Mr. Michael Stephen of ,Coastal Engineerin9' representin9 the t.. .... ~.l\y Road at the time of initial construction 80 that, a. .oon a. .ewa9- facilities are available, no additional construction will have to b_ made. He said that final approval of the Master Drainage plan has been received as well as approval of the E~cavation Permit for the project by the WM~B. He said the required element in the first. step for the water management syste. Is to addre.s e~isting off-site drainage problems of which the developer Is aware and that final approval of the Commissioners is needed to immediately begin to take action to construct the off-site drainage system that will address those local area problems. He said no changes other than those mentioned by Ms. Layne have been made to the plan and that the wetland upland line has been defined, flagged and surveyed and that will be the actual building limit line. ¡~ '(~ 1 ,." .: !: J'i '~.~ :j ~, . i Hr. Stephen said that the project is scheduled for Board action by the SFWMD on September 12, 1981 for the drainage plan of the pro'ect. He said that staff'. recommendation for ·PUD- rezoning to alleviate the a~:', .RM-2- areas within the project was the best way to proceed. Mr. H. A. Spencer said he did not understand the com~erclal aspects of the ·PUD· and asked if the developer i. planning on putting commercial in the area, to which Ms. Layne .ald that, when the notices are sent out, an attachment Is included stating that the developer Is planning to rezone to Planned Unit Development and that a golf cours. and 749 unit multi-family develo~ent is plAnned and there would be no cOJDIDerchl without amending the ·PUD- document. Mr~,.Spencer .ald U s: . '~. ---......----...........---...-.--..........,-.--.- ~cœ 063 tAtE i87 Pa9· . ,..; .' . . . . . . . I, ,., ·,f " . .. ~ " .. .. I '.. ., '.., ."\ . ...", ,. ,t'. .., , . , '. . , \ . .. '1 .. ~ . ' . . ", . " , f r. . . . ' "" I· \¡;,/"~, ,:'~ ',-. --4 :' 'J--'" . - ~. ~, '. ','i , . ; ~~~- 063 PAtë 188 August 25, 1981 ,. ~~ that va. the situation, he was for the project. M5. Layne said that ý . - - the .pun- zoning would not allow the developer to do anything different than what he could under the present zoning. Comals.ioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried unanimously, that the public he~ring be closed. Commis8ioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously, that Ordinance No. 81-40 bo adopted and entered into Ordinance Book l3 as nua,berecS and entitled be10wl ..:;:~ '\4 r ~' ORDIN~NCE 81-.40 AN ORDINANCE ~MENDING ORDINANCE 73-30, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REOULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE COAST~L ~RE~ PLANNINO DISTRICT BY AMENDINO THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERS 50-25-1 ~ND 50-25-6 BY CH~NOING THE ZONING CLASSIFIC~TION FROM RM-l, RM-1ST, RM-2, RM-2ST, GC ~ND aC-ST TO PUD FOR PROPERTY LOC~TED IN SECTIONS 1l, 14 AND 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, R~NGE 25 EAST FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS FISHERMAN'S COVE AND BY PROVIDING FOR ~N EFFECTIVE DATE EXCAVATION PER~IT NO. 59.127, FISHERM~N'S COVE, SECTIONS 11, 14, 15, 22 AND 24, ON SITE WEST or ~ELLY RO~D OFP FERN DRIVE - APPROVED :'¡ I,oj' 1 ;, Public Works Administrator Barksdde explainecS that Excavation " Perait No. 59.127 Is part of the overall 8ite development plans for .&aheraan'. Cove ancS that the Master Drainage Plans were reviewed by ataff and WMAB with recommendations for approval with the following aUptllationsl ;'." . ._, . "",,,,,!...;:,, ·~;.;2.\:VJÙ~~t" ..~ ·(~;tij~, ' ."'.y .. '..'~~j:'# ..:., '-: ~,....,._,. _.~,_~.,...."".."o,,,,.,_,,.._·.","""'"'."~_ "".......",""·"",",,,..0""""",.1,,_''';,," . , , 1. 2. All excavation material Is to remain on alte. No pumping 1. to take place without specific approval of South Florida Water ~anaqement District. The depth of all excavations I'. limited to elevation -12.0 msl llld teð by clay or rock. . , 'No natural drain~ge systems shall be disturbed by t.he exca- vation until the related perimeter by-pass swales are c01llpleteð . Th.re shall b. no blasting. All applicable provisions ~f Ordinance No. 80-26 shall ba adhered to. 3. 4. 5. 6. Mr. Barksdale noted that Item 4 above would address Mr. spencer'. concern during the discussion of the preceding petition. He said that the off-site drainage swales must be lnst~ll.d before the ponds ara atarted. Commiesion.r Wenzel moved, second.d by Commi.sion.r Kruse and carri.d unanimously, that the Board approve Excavation Permit No. 59.127 for Fish.rman's Cove. , RESOLUTION 81-189 APPROVINO VAC~TION OF AN EASEMENT LOCATED ON NORTH 20 FEET OP SOUTH 30 FEET OF SOUTH 105 FEET ~ND THE 60 FOOT BISECTING EASEMENT OP TR~CT 101, UNIT 29, OOLCf.N OATE EST~TES - ~DOPTED L.gal notice having been publish~d In the Naples Cally News on August 9 and 16, 1981, as .videnced by ~ffidavit of publication filed with the Cl.rk, public hearing was opened to consid.r a petition to vacat. an ....ment locat.d on the north 20 f.et of the south 30 f.et of the south 105 fe.t and the 60 foot bisectfnq eas~ent of Tract 101, Unit 29, Golden Oate Estat.s, filed by Tom Tyson. Public Works Administrator Barksdale explain.d that the petition to vacate an eas.ment and the 60 foct bis.cting easement of Tract lOl, Unit 29, Golden Oat. Estates has b.en revieweð by the Engin.erlng Department, and the WMAB, and that -Lett.rs of No Objection- froM the Utilities and from the adjacent property owners had been recelveð and that staff recommendation is for approval of the vacation. ,cox Ob'3/AtE189 P~e 14 ___............~..................., ~~...-......- po-- r- ---.-..-...................-. ,~ . ' ,.. ~1' , J".:', .,", .:' .... ) " ~/:, .\ -, <I, i~' .{ 41 ,. ~ "- ~ "I ,I ..¡.. " - -, .' . .; .. \, , ::'2;.;;,.~~\>·~;'~~~ , . _.."._"'.,...~".,._,-"._"'...-'~ " .....,.. ... I~ of ,.~. ,.... , " (' ~" I,,;. . . ..... ~, ..-\ '. '. .... . . . ., ... . ...-; :.~~ ~. . " , , Þ,: . . ,., '. ... .-. ''¡ . .. ' . . . ." ----....-------- , \\ ',':" .,,~. ~ .,"<., ~~~---~~-~~~-~~~~ ~ :,~: 063 PACtl90 Ie,',' ~j : ,~¡. ~ . i ~ ',~ Íi:1.. ~ ~. 01 . c.rr1.ð unanimo~8ly, that Resolution 81-189, approving the vacation August 25, 1981 '. ..... " Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commission.r Krus. and an ...~.nt located on the north 20 feet of the south 30 feet of the south 105 feet and the 60 foot bisecting easement of Tract lOl, Unit 29, Golden Oate Estates, be adopted. :~ ",1';' :~I ~,., " l .'. ~. ..... ~;,' ¡.,.,.. , , ;" -'"'' "..-- ----... "., '''_,.,......~....'''''''''.'.............,_..'__.·,i.....''''·_..,·_'''''·'''''~ .. 'I'. , i·!'.... . , /-.... . . .... ::)0. \ .' . ': .. :'''',,'' . ,.\ " .-' \, .,..' . t.. . '. . .. .. . ... ". .. . -t··' ~:' ". . ........ . ......; ...: . .' .'.¡., .~... .er, '. '1'\ .', I '" . . t· .. . .. ~:.:~~. I.;', . ;', r'.". . I " fl.> .. ~ _ ~~":"""'........,.--tt ___ ' ~""-"''''''.-III ........;,--"'--'.-.... ---'--" --- --" ---*..... ......... 063 PAc£192 August 25, 1981 .'.... - ....... ~ ...**RECESSI 10100 A.M. RECONVENEDI 10110 ~.M.*···· RESOLUTION 81-190 RE PETITION CCCL-Bl-2C, VANDERBILT SURP COLONIES ASSOCIATION, LTD., REQUESTINO A V~RIANCE FROM THE COASTAL CONTROL LINE FOR LOTS 3 , 4, BLOCK .~., BAKER-CARROLL POINT, UNIT NO.2, 10851 GULFSRORE DRIVE - ~DOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on August 9, 1981, as evidenced by ~ffidavit of publication file~ with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition CCCL-81-2C, filed by Vanderbilt Surf Colonies ~8sociation, Ltd., requesting a variance from the Coastal Control Line for lots 3 and 4, Block wAw, Baker-Car- roll Point, Unit No.2, 10851 Oulfshore Drive. Community Development Director Virta explained that Petition CCCL-8l-2C is a request for a variance from the CCCL to allow the placement of sod seaward of the Control Line. He note~ that a varlanc. / r.quest was approved immediately northward of the site for the sa~e type of coverage of the ground with sod and that varianèe ha~ re.ulte~ In some serious environmental problems. He said that a. a result of those problems staff recommends approval but have obtained an agree~.nt with the builder to plant the last 3' in sea grapes and to provide for wooden walkovers so that there are controlled access points onto the b.ach. He .aid the previous people wandered -helter skeltef- on the beach and as a result there was degradation of the dunes existing on the beach .n~ aome of the residents had cut into the dune line because of .torage of their catamarans. The developers also agreed to place '~ .IVn. warning of pen.title. for ð..tructlon of. soa oats, Mr. V1rta ~:'=~ ';'.,~' .ald, and that, bas.d on the above considerations, staff reco.end. , approval. 'j;~\1 ~ , .. '4' ,Chalr.an Pi.tor askecS what would stop thi. varSance fro. r..ulttft9 . :"";";,.,. . ' . ... <~: ;J; '.oJ ,.~ ),,~ ,,1'4 :,~ ~', !,~. '.\Ie ......., . ,ave l' ......... "I; ,.,..~ ,!¢~ ....;¡ \r~ ,.., .,",.,..,~~.,...,....;-....,.,.,.,.",..; ."""·,...,"",.._"",,,_~_....<_......,'__""'4~·""""__ \. .~\-~:. t: - .i ' ~. , \. ,. I,·" .& . .~ .. , q .. , , ;, ~ .: ... .. ~ . ~ ~ugust 25, 1981 , ., In .nvlronMental problem. like the previous variance granted, and Mr. vlrta exlalned that the 3' planting o~ sea.~rape. between the sod and dune would discourage people from 90i"9 through the area. Co_is. loner Wimer said he did not understand why the developor vanted to run the sod out so far and Mr. Virta said they feel it 1. noeded to prevent erosion as wen as provide a more aesthetic yard area. The point was made that this request was turned down once before and the petitioner reapplied at which time it was approved. Mr. David Kelly, of Vanderbilt surf Colonies Associates, said that when the petitioner applied before they did not specify what kind of sod would be installed and that later he returned and said that flora- tam sod, which is fairly salt tolerant, would be used. He slid thlt one of the catamarans stored on the beach belonged to a resident and after the signs were posted, the catamaran. were removed. ße explained that the line of sea oat. Is a good barrier to keep people out. In response to Commissioner Wenzel, Mr. Kelly said the developer wanted to put vllks throU9h the sea oats to keep people froa walking on the se. oats. Co.missioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse, and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Co..lssioner Wenzel ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and cðrrled 3/2, with CommissIoners Wi~.r and pistor opposed, that Resolu- tion 81-190 re Petition CCCL-81-2C reque.tlng a variance fro. the Coastal Control Line tor lot. 3 and 4, Block -A-, Baker-Carroll Point, Unit No. 2 be adopted. ,1 . } 4 " &COI( 063 PACE 193 page 1'7 ~: ·;:t~~: ' J~;i<¢ '''1'''~,'''' , -'-'-"~'" ."-' :)- '.".~, ':'w/ '6B?:§ .~,~~t:tlt '. " .f .: . ' ~ ;. '. 1... +' " ~'" " 't H I ~ ,t ¡ '; \, ¡ ·d ., ... :~""." ':",,' ~~'fÍ't . '"'I. .....""" h""".) .....,., '''f!_-~' -:s; ~.',. ..'~ '. ~.,~ .......;..;.'..:;:.,'\;,~~~::Y.r August 25,' 1981 ... RESOLUTION 81-191 RE PETITION v-al-lBC, DON ~~AN, RE VARIANce PROM ~H! MINIMUM LAND AREA REQUIREMENTS NEEDED TO CONSTRUCT A DUPLEX ON LOTS 13 AND l4, BLOCK 51, NAPLES PARK, UNIT 4, 9lst AVENUE NORTH - ~DOPTED . . .. Legal notice having been published In the Naples Dally N.va on August 9, 1981, as evidenced by Affidavit of publication filed with Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-8l-l8C, fil_d- by Don'Swan, requesting a variance from the minimum land area require- ~ent. needed to construct a duplex on lots 13 and 14, Block 51, Naple. Park, Unit 4, 91st Avenue North. Zoning Director Perry explained that the petitioner requested a variance of 455-1/2 square feet in the required land area by providing two lots totalling 12,544.5 square feet instead of the requ~red 13,000 square feet as required by the ·RM-l~· district. He said that the proble~ stems from the fact that the lots have a 30' drainage rlght- of-way which was taken from the back of the property and this has shortened the depth of the lots. He said the Public Works DepartDent stated that the right-of-way was taken in lieu of an easement becau.e of a Dajor drainage way coming from one of the eÐstern streets and that it was nece.sary that it be much larger to avoid people frOft having to construct fences. Mrs. Don Swan, wife of the petitioner, spoke in favor of the petition. Commissioner Wenzel ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Co..i.· sioner Wer.zel moved, seconded by Co~issioner Kruse and carried unani.ously, that Resolution 81-192 re Petition V-8l-18C, requesting a variance from the .lnimu. land area requirements needed to construct a ' duplex on lots 13 and 14, Block 51, Naples Park, Unit 4, 9lst Avenue' North, be adopted. BOOK 063 rACE 197 '89- 11 -----..--------........----...----- ... - ". · , ~ :¡;lr' , ,.~.... . fI'· ( .'';,~' ~ , <-:'æ"l&,~~ , , - . ..... . . . - -'..-'. .... ~ .. " .AI . . . '''::~1t , ' "f~,!,. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .\ , ';d'" ~ I '.,;~r~:~ ";~tr~: .' . ',"I'"~ )6.('¡-·;'" ¡~~"11£. .,fi;_~ ',' '~t~¡ ,fi~ . :,;"'i i·: ,;~.... ({iff, .... ~\\ ,~, ... .. o ..' . , r'. - , '1 \ . . , , , . " ~... ' !,y~.~' ~ ,\ .<~ .~,/ '. .~ ~~. Ob'3 nœ200 ~U9ust 25, 1981 PETITION A-8l-3C, PETER PRUE, JR., APPEALING ZONING DIRECTOR'S DECISIOM CONCERNING ~EEPINO BEES IN A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT - APPROV~L GRANTED FOR PETITIONER TO ~EEP ONE RIVE ON RIS PROPERTY Legal notice having been published In Naples Daily News on Augu.t 9, 1981, a. evidenced by ~ffidavlt of publication filed with Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition A-8l-3C, filed by Peter prue, Jr., appealin9 the Zoning Director's decision concerning keeping be.s in a r,sidential zoning district. Zoning Director Perry explained that the petitioner i. asking the Board of Zonin9 Appeals to review his Interpretation of the zoning Ordinance specifically concerning his decision that beekeeping is not an accessory use that is customarily incidental to the principal use. In re.ponse to Commissioner Wenzol~ Mr. Perry said he based his decis- ion on his interpretation of the zoning Ordinance. Commissioner wenzel asked if the four hives in Mr. prue~. yard were a commercial venture, and Mr. Perry said the bees are kept solely for his own enjoyment and he has more hives elsewhere. Mr. Peter pru., Jr. stated he had other hives but the one. at hi. h~e are ju.t a hobby for his family and hlm.elf, and that they h~ve been there nearly one year. He said he could not find any law which state. he could not have the bee hives at hi. home. In respons. to Commission.. Wenzel, Mr. prue ..id he did not knov who filed the c~pl.int, and thet when he questioned hi. neighbors, none of the. co~plalned. In re.pon.e to Co~.tsstoner ~ru.e, Mr. Perry .ald the lot in question I. approxiNately 75' by 150'. " .. "r. prue pointed out that no one ha. been stung by the b.... County Attorney Pickworth .ald that Mr. Perry wa. correct In his , . , ' ¡,,".t.netard. for cons1derin9 whether bee keeping I. or i. not an acee..or, · 't-. ',,', ': ,.'; ..,'" .. w ," Ii ',J, n, . ~, " .' '. 'ate 1 t I .' ,t . .-, ·'_··b";.__,,^"';"".'"'__'_~''''''''''';''''''''''"___''__''''''_~'" v,"'o._""",.,.#;_~.....""___~*""",,,.¿,~_·""'__"_-"""-'---"··""'·_' . '00. 'Ob'3 tAtE 20f ~,' 1t~""';*)~,'~t'";~r8''' ,.t~~"::':¡\;'d;'~;i~ "..~,_ J!' ....-." .... ".\'.. . ... .,.~.f" .... ;....'._~ 9",_...... ~ '·"11-......·· ,,",, .',., '}',', ¡,;;;,a.. . ~. _ '\ "...,.'\.... ~.., .'? '. .r. ... .... 4f , '-' ~. . __"'""T' " '''',.,~;:t{ 'i I "~ . ,. '. ~.. '" "...',' , , '. ,'- ".' ... .. . ~. ..... . . . . '.' . .', ' ' . " _..... '~.....,...". 'l1li iii.. ... _~ -...t.....__........... "1'-" ..... .. '...7-Jir'þ t.."......." '. " . " .,',' \1, -: 1., )..:û"~'t'f~.~.\ 1 ,.. """ ,.....,...".... ~·'l..,'J; .. ....... .,.;.:. ,"'~.'. . . " ·.f.. ::-_ .~¿"...i.. . .~~A't AtJ9ust 25, 1981 us.. Øe said one of thl basic purpos's of " zoning was to prot.c~ re.idential neighborhooð.. Com~is.ioner Wenzel asked if one hive woulð be enough and Mr. pru. answ.red afflr~atively anð that he could remove three if necessary. . Mr. Hike Zewalk spoke against allowing Mr. prue to keep the be.. In hi. yard. ComMissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner ~ru.e and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner Brown Doved, seconded by Commis.ioner Wenzel and carried unanimously, that Petition A-8l-3-C, allowing Mr. prue to keep one hive of bee. in his yard, be approved. ORDINANCE NO. 8l-4l AMENDING ORDIN~NCE NO. 75-6, OCHOPEE PIRE CONTROL DISTRICT, INCRE~SING TAX LEVY C^P FROM 1 TO 1.5 MILLS - ~DOPTED Legal notice having been published in Naples Dally News on ~ugust 6, 1981, as evidenced by ^ffidavit of publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider amending Ordinance 75-6 to increase the millage from one mill to one and one-half Dills in the OChopee Pire COntrol District. Public Safety ~ministrator Hafner explained the nece.sity to change the one mill cap to one and one-half mills in the OChopee Fire Control District because the dwindling funds being received fro. the rederal Covernment makes it impossible to continue the OChopee rire Control District without that increase. Commissioner Wenzel ~oved, .econded by Co~i.sioner ~rus. and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner , Wenzel .oved, seconded by COmMissioner Brown and carried unani.ously, that Ordinance No. 8l-4l b. adopted and entered Into Ordinance Book 13 a. nu.bered and entitled below I pege 20 - . . ... .., ... . ''''~ . .,' , :'~:'f 't. ,..~",., , . ....~t Ij. ,'t ~,., ~, _. '. ~ ~' . .J . tI. ~." ~~..:. ., .t;t.,I.~:'~ ... "': " :"~" ~_____"':'______"'''''~'~~àA~~l' Auguat 25, 1981 -:,,_ >~';~~ . ",~ ','.;';': ~ '!Y~, ~. r~~, 21 ¡~l,".·.. " "i "'~, ~ .. ;.,..':_' , ,.-,.:t.. .,(~ -þ'ff *.. -# '.~ > "~,.;~ ..' , '{; .~ ~. . '. Go,:, , J '.' ,{ tr 063 2011) )", &E ~ -~, ORDIN~NCE 81-4l AN ORDIN.a.NCE AMENDXUG ORDIN~NCE NO. 75-6 BY AMENDING GUBSECTION 2(d) OF SECTION ONE THEREOF CHANGING THE POWER TO LEVY FROM ONE MILL TO ONE ~ND ONE-HALF (1-1/2) MILL or AD V~LOREM TAXES UNDER SECTION l2S.0l(q) OP THE FLORIDA ST~TUTES, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATI. PROPOS~L BY ROSS, HARDIES, O'~EEPE, B~ÐCOCK , P~RSONS TO PROVIDE CONSULTING WOR~ FOR EST~BLISHMENT OF IMP~CT FEES - ~PPROVED, NOT INCLUDING SCHOOL BO~RD, IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000 County Attorney Pickworth reminded the Commi.sioners of a discus- sion held a few weeks ago on the subject of impact fees and the studle. n.c.ssary to effectiv.ly implement same, at which tlm. some r.pr.sent- ative. of the firm of Ros., Hardles, O'Keefo, Babcock' Parsons were pr.sent. Mr. pickworth said that the firm submittod a proposal in a l.tt.r to him dated August 3, 1981 proposing a two st.p proc.ss of an overall review of the County'. curr.ntly existing facilities, and current capital I~provem.nts along with specific rec~endations as to , hov the County could proceed toward i~pl.ø.ntin9 i~pact f.... Mr. Pickworth said that Attorney Daniel O·Conn.ll, from the Boca Ratop Office of Ross, Hardies, O'~e.fe, Babcock' Parsons, was pres.nt to ansver any questions the Com~ls.ioners might hav.. Co.-isslon.r W.nzel said h. f.lt a. far as the Board va. concerned thlt .taff could establish and substantlat. the fee. s.t, such a. Utllltle. and roads, etc. and he .sked if the .Ituatlon we. .ore In relation ~ the School Syst~ anð Mr. Pickworth answered negatively. lie ..1d ~ dId ftOt think that .ataff. could hanðle .~he .ubject of f~.. " ' tor v"11Iti.s and roads fr~ the standpoint of ~.npower, If nothing Wenzel Hid h. thought the School laird wa ,oint to , , , " .:; I , , .. ,. ,.'.' .......,__~.,''''....__,.,._'''''''~,._....,."..''".,'''".._....,__~_,,_''',......."''-"__0.....-·· ..~"., .''''''''''''''~W>;~"""__,-",___,,,,·_"~,., .~'a~""'''____'''_~'-~·''~''''"''___'''"'''''='__'··''''· , ; t. . ;~" '"'.; .~ ¡,. ,~,~~~¡~~.~t~'ÿ!¡, , '> ",,: .\..',~ ~,'~:~;:!, ,,/',[,' ..." ...1~':;;..": ,.)_,~;:: .~,¡.- ",'7",~:~' '. ,., AÚcJust. . 25; ..... ,... - ~ be Involved and pay a portion of the coat. ~nd Hr. pickwort.h said the , . ' ,proposal being discussed for $15,000 wou~d Include just matter. Whicb ,co~e under the Board's jurl.di~tion. He said that if the School Board wished to have a similar study or to be included they could work It out with the Ross, Hardies, etc. firm and he said he thought he understood from the last discussion that the County was not going to pay for the School Boa rd . Chairman pistor said that if the proposal was written it would be put into effect, hopefully, before December 31, 1981 and it. will be on the books and be effective by the ond of this year. He said if the proposal was written 80 that it meets legal requiremente, he felt the County could have a successful impact fee impl~mentation and could start to collect money for roads and parks. County Manager Norman said , he wanted tÓ point out What he perceived to be the relationship between the .t~~y being discussed and the school impact fee study. He said the firm has been introduced to represent the School Board and it was hi. belief and desire that the School Board would discuss with them the possibility of their performing consulting services directly for the School Board and then when agreement was reached with the School Board on a program which was acceptable to the School Board, that would be the time for the School Board and Board of County Commissioner. to qet toqether and develop the ordinance that is necessary to implement. i.pact fees for the School Board. He said he envisioned the School Board study being a separate but equal'proqram funded by the School ~ard. tOO~ 063 PAt£203 Page 22 .-..... - i-<.. , .~ , ~:.: .~ ,.,; " ~ ' y~ ~:; " ~;-~,' ~~__~~""""JII<T-___"""--__r-""""---~ . , fr"'i ;<"'.......' .; '. t f,. ",''':''.'' . ..':'::.. ,./_.....'~... ..'\µ"~~ . '. . , , , .. '.. ,", ' . ' . t .. _,_ . . . ~~ì~{ r. I ,. . \ . , \ " . . . r ... ' ".. .. . .. . . ........-.-........................".~.................----ð -... . ~U9u.t 25, 1981 . ',cœ 063 rACE 204 " I \. Chairman pi. tor .aid he thought it was past due for the Board to i., . . take ao~e action on this subject and that he received two calls on Auguat 24, 1981 from people who said they had contacted the School Board .nd were told that it was up to the Board of County Co~is.loner. .nd that -they are dragging their feet and won't pa.s the i~pact f..·. A short discussion followed regarding the ordinanc. which Ever- 91ade. City would not accept with Mr. Norman stating that there were .ome problems with that ordinance. Chairman pi.tor noted that Broward County has an impact fee ordinance and money has been coll.cted but the money Is In escrow and the ordinance i. under legal consideration. Mr. Norman said that there would probably be 2, 3 or 4 .eparate fees and not a single impact fee because each area would have to be treated .eparately. Mr. David Craham spoke in opposition to impact fee.. Co~i.sioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commis.ioner wi..r, that the Soard authorize Ro.., Hardies, O'Keefe, Babcock' Parsons to do the fir.t pha.. .tudy regarding impact fee. at a cost of $15,000, not to include the School Board. Mr. Daniel O'Connell .aid that during the ffrst ph~~~ study, hi. fi~ would look very clo.ely at the County's particular needs In three .ervice .rea., I.e. outdoor parks recreation, road end aewer and 90v.rnDental facilities, and that the drafting of .n ordinance would be In . .econd stage If, ba..d on the infor.at!on provided, th.t look. to be . defen.ible .rea for the County to have an ordinance draft.d based upon the County'. particular capital ne.d. and'aváilåbl'e revenue. and nec....ry e.penditurea. He said·,h. vanted to ...ke .ure that the , ., " ,. '. ,~,." :''1''.t,..,.,~.../.. ,..;....;~ ". ... '.,'.,.' " ,.... '., i,', to' . ,. ~ Ii "'-'wi ~:" ~~~.;1.'~: ~';"J.:/;t":.\¡,l";;'·' <..(." .~:~ , ;. "1\":~:~('¡'\' ¡¡:.f.'...,. '. .""",,~ ,'.' ¡'.~ v' ""'1'1 -.\ .~~ "~~;r:~~. 1. . \~:,.~."'¡:" A-¡ _ .,,,,,0-' ....~ ".,:- I,.:.J.(' ~.',.~,~j.~ ....,. ".j, t. ,~:'...~' ~ ,'I . -10" " ;-". , . , " . . ~ ...... ... . .... '......... .. ...~.... ,_ ~ .JI,,'~"" .. August 25, 1981 C~is.ioner. unðerstooð there is no way to draft an ordinance in two .onths. Ther. vas a short-ðiscu..ion during which Mr. O'Connell .aid that the d..ign of the impact fee a. a growth management tool i. based on , land development activity \lihl.ch i. causeð by growth and If it i.' to b. allocateð fairly, the systems usually are collecting the fee for new growth and new construction anð that in some cases that would cover people who are moving from a neighboring County. Upon call for the question, the motion passed 3/2, with co~i.sioner Kruse and Brown opposed. Mrs. Oerri Kalvin, School Board member, pointed out that the SChool Board had not ·.aid no· to an impact fee and she asked, regard- Ing the previous impact ordinance, if the County area was divided into three divisions into which monies would be collected and spent and Mr. pickworth said he believed 80. Mrs. ~alvin asked if the section of the ordinance r~arding approval by the two cities within the County line. was added at the end and she was answered in the affirmative. RESOLUTION 81-192 RE PETITION PU-81-3C, BASS ENTE~PRISES, REQUESTING PROVISION~L USE (1) or THE .~. DISTRICT FOR OIL AND O~S EXPLOR~TION rOR PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIM~TELY SIX MILES NORTH or U.S. 41 AND ONE MILE EAST or 840~, E~ST or OCHOPEE - ~DOPTED Planner Lee Layne located the property r&9ardinq petition PU-8l-3C, filed by B.ss Enterpri.es, on a ~ap on an overhead board a. being approximately six mile. north of U.S. 41 and one mile .a.t of 840A, ea.t of OChopee. She explained that the Planning Commi.slon held their public hearing on March 5, 1981 anð recommended approval .ubject to the planning Department not putting the item on the Board'. agenda . '''" until the Big Cypre.. Swamp Advi.ory Co~mittee had reviewed the petition. She .aid that notico was received two week. ago that the _... ... 8~~\' 003 ...:- f')~ , I,,,,. ~ PacJ. 24 -~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~ . ,-,,1 ,..,-., ... .. ..., \, - . . .'~ '- ....'" , \ ..", ,;: ,1,:-' .. . .' .." :. . \" ',. ~ . "WI .. ' : .~.. I.,. r ~ ..\ ~.. \ ' . '10- W'_"" ~~~t;I~."'.">"~>'-~"';' "'.' 4'~ ....~,... ".'~,. ~..... .14·..'·:.,....'1...,· ~ ~" "~~.~~:~..,r.Æ·~~,'~~,',~~,;.:-..,~... ,....,~,.....:~... '.._.,.. w,. "'....'~. ;¡:~~4J' 'f\o. ,~'~...~,:~\;.~.~ ~, I _ \ ' ..... . "o¡",' ¡ i.,;,' ,. " 'i '!'t ~', ",~.'" :." . r .- ...... .~. ' . ',,,.. , . . ," ,":.s~;':: . ¡~'" ';~' ': "-:' '. ': " I, '. ,', ·....Ü!...' . . ,,"';\:" ~,'~":, ',...,.....".~.."Jb,.... "'" I, ',~ ' . ,..,}>..., ~. ,"fl,'~i~',~·,. f.'·:J.t~i·: ".. ",.: . ,:",' ~ _ . .', ¡':: ~.'.. ..;.:~ (',' 'II:........"þ¡.,¡w. ...,~ ....,...... ",.. I . . . ~.. ' . , .' ' .....-.--..........;:.........:J.-"'_____~"_'_~- , >" ", ~ c August 25, 1981 . .....';, ~ ' -........ .Að~l.ory Committee had approved the petition with the following ~ r -: ... atlpulat1on.. ..t·Îi' , (. .' 'II.. t" .> 1. o '~ Comply with all conditions .et forth by the Big Cypre.. SWa~p Advisory Committee, DER, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Department of Interior and any other regulating agency. . Acce.. road ahall be removed upon abandonment of drilling operation.. 2. Commi.sloner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner ~ru.e and carried unanimously, that Petition PU-81-J-C be approved subject to the above stipulations. The Flnding-of-Fact and Petiti~ner's Agreement to stipulations were accepted for the record. ~ ~.,. . ~ >"'~~'~" ::~ ~)2;¢ ~ '. ~ . , , :';I'",!~, -, ~-r.. ',' ;-~. '. ~!,~f\·:t::~f:·;~~:,·' "'~ ¡ .'1 u .~ ~' , ~U<Just 25, 1981 RESOLUTION 8l-l93 RE PETITION PU-8l-l0C, V~NDER8ILT UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, RIOUESTING PROVISIONAL USE 3 or TßE -RS-3- DISTRICT FOR A - CHURCH LOCATED ON THE'NORTH SIDE OF PIPER BOULEV~RD AT THE WEST'~D or" PIPER BOULEV~RD IN WILLOUGHBY ~CRES - ~DOPTED ,Planner Lee Layne located the property r89arcU"9 Petition PU-81-l0C, filed by Vanderbilt United presbyterian Church, on a map on an overhead board as being In the Willoughby ~cres/Palm River Estate. are. immediately west of willoughby place at the end of piper Boul.- vard. She explained that the Planning Commission held their public he.ring on ~ugu.t 6, 1981 and recommended approval subject to the followi"9 recommendatlonsl 1. Detinitlve site drainage plans must be submitted to the County Engineer for review and approval prior to the start of any construction. 2. Parking area shall be of a pervious material. 3. Access shall be restricted to piper Boulevard with no direct access to Immokalee Road. 4. All signs shall be approved by the Zoning Director. Commissioner Wenzel asked if the water and .ewer problems had been corrected and Ms. Layne replied in the affirmative. Dr. Ed Gammon, representing Vanderbilt United presbyterian Church, spoke in favor of the petition. Mr. Ellwood witt was registered to speak but declined to do so. Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried unanimously, that Resolution 81-193 re Petition PU-81-l0C be adopted. The Finding-of-ract and Petitioner's ~reement to stipula- tion. were accepted for the record. ,cox 063 ~ 2Z5 "9. 26 ___.....-.-.............-. ~~.....,"!:7-.---.--~""" 1IffI1~ ~~ , :. '- " , "'--'--""""'''''''''''''''''''''''''';'''''';' r~~ .:Â~_... '.þ ,..', ~~( )?f· " '. . / ' - ~ . /:,it.... _.....'~_~4oA~ , , .... . , ' ~........--~---..........,-------""" '" ; '" ... . AUCJust 25, 1981 ~ 063 P1tE232 PtTITION TR-8l-l6C, A. T. B~LLARD, REOUESTINO TEMPORARY RESIDENCB PERMIT TO UTILIZE A TRAVEL TRAILER DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A PRINCIPLB RESIDENCE ON A 1.5 ACRE PARCEL or LAND LOCATED ON 4TH STREET, N.B., APPROXIMATELY 7 MILES NORTH OF OOLDEN GATE BLVD. AND 5.5 MILES EAST or C.R. 95l - APPROVED Zoning Director Perry explained Petition TR-Bl-16C, filed by A. T. Ballard, is requesting a temporary residence permit to utillz. . trav.l trail.r during construction of a residence on land located on 4th Street, N.E., approximately seven miles north of Golden Oate Boulevard. In response to Commissioner Wenzel, Mr. Perry said all requirements have been met. Co~mi8sioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Brown, and carried unanimously, that petition TR-8l-16C be approved. RECOMMENDATION REO~RDING LOC^TION FOR PROPOSED WATER CONTROL STRUCTURE AT THE COCOH~TCHEE CANAL/C.R. 836 - RETURNED TO BIO CYPRESS B~SIN BOARD FOR STUDY RE FE~SIBILITY OF INSTALLATION OF WEIR IN CONJUNCTION WITH P~LM RIVER BRIDGE Public Works Administrator Bark.dale explained that the/obj.ctiv. of this item i. to obtain the Board of County Commi..ioner.' approval for the location of a water control structur. at a site approximately 400 f.et w..t of the Palm River Boulevard Bridge. He said the purpo.. of the structure is to prevent salt water intrusion and to Incr.a.. the fre.hvater recharge. He said that tho 8ig Cypress Ba.ln Board'. con.ultant .ngineerln9 firm, Oe. , Jenson, conduct.d a pr.llmlnary d..ign .tudy for the structur. to be located at Site A shown on the location .ap attached to the Executive Su~mary and that after cost co.parlaon .tudi.s wer. made, the con.ultant va. a.ked to con.lder a third structure d.si9n which is a combination fix.d cr..t-slid. 9at. .tructur. that Is significantly lover in cost than the previous two ð..Stn.. "r. Bark.dal. not.d th.t the cost e.tS.at.. are In the P~. 21 ~'~ .~. , ' '. ;,; I ' :ifj " . 4'i~ .., '<:::¡, :', ',¡þ','i ,','" ~'\Cf Ji'i:>~' August Ixecutiv. Summary with the fixed crest-slld- qate structure liated at $200,880. *****Commissioner Brown left the room at lltOS A.M.**·** Mr. Barksdale said that both the Big Cypress Basin Board and the WMAB have recommended that the fixed crest-slide gate structure be used. He stated that during the BCBB and WMAB meetings oppo.ition to the location of the structure at Site A was voiced by property owner. adjacent to the canal on the north side, primarily because the canal 1. currently being used for boat access to the Oulf via the Cocohatche. River. He said opposition was a180 raised by reeldents of Palm River to Site B, approximately 1300 feet to the east because the structure would detract from the area's appearance. Mr. Barksdale said that after acaB authorization, the consultant conducted a study to assess the eftects of the differences in benefit. between the two locations and concluded that the loss of benefit in locating the structure upstream would be minimal due to water level. in the surrounding areas being maintained at elevation +3.5 msl or qreater and that the greatest benetit is gained by the installation of the structure at either location in light of the fact that the existing canal is tidal. He noted that the consultant reported the cost of construction at either site would be the same. He stated that the BeSS and the WMAB have recommended that the structure be located at Site B approximately 400 feet west of the Palm River Boulevard Bridge. Commi..ioner Wenzel said that the fixed cre.t-sllde qate structure would not be exposed above the grade level and Mr. Barksdale said that , , the only thing that would be above grade would be the turn pedestal. for the gates on each end. eoOl( 063 beE 233 'age 21 ....-----------~ ., , ~ . 4 . 'r ". .' .'" ", ,. 1t-" . . ;. ... .. .. ". ·/,,~~,·,1~ :~.. ," ~. .,.r ~Yþ- , , ,.. ':\' ' , ;..f ..< ',') - . ",. ...'~ ,.... I'll . ,.;.~ '.~-'" ' . .,. -.:.~ I ~ '..,t ~ ..... ,...., ~-I ... '" ~ ",' , ,..', '" . ~'! ~.. t .' ... ... .'" '" .. ri· .., oj" ,~,:.¡;;:.:.;I " . .W j;:".:.rl;~'f',· ~..'~' .:;,.t~, .. ~ J. ~. .¡~~..~~f. ¡ I r,'. .. " ' In re.pon.e to Chairman pi.tor'. question, Mr. vidz.. .ald that th. ICBB .nd the WHAB feel .trongly that a weir I. n.c...ary In the .re.. Øe laid that with further dev.lopment In the .r.a It would b.c~e .tr....d and further intru.ion of .alt wat.r will occur. Coøml.lioner ~ru.. noted that one group of land own.rl have an a..thetic objection and the other Vroup'. obj.ctiv. would r..ult· in ~~;i:~:probîêu with the Corpa of Engineer. Ind Mr. Vidle. concurred. ,.~--:>"'>: . ,.1 ~ :';:~?'~ ,llOu..lon foUowd rec¡arcUnc¡ l.ndle.pine¡ whleh would hel;' "~;~;~/þ>:>,~~~, ",~, ; ,,'~ '¡ " " ">',J~:A·S;~~~:::)~~;:"~:;,:" . " .;.:g.',.·2.'W~::\' ,., ...., ' ' " .,.. ',' "~' ~ ' .' :-.¡ ,"'~-"'., ·'~~:i""¡/··.-~1J"'~l",~"-~:"'· -... ¡ Jr" \ '". '.~' ~ .I~.'~ þ :.,~J" \~."';,t:þ("'" 'I/Í',., J;¿ .' ': ~ .\' . ". ,f ":', ~;~',~(~ '~;"". , : :\",~~-">.;~ Jougu.t 25, 1901 ..... . '* 063 Jm234 ..***commi..I~n.r Brown returned to the room at 11111 Jo.".**... The following per.ona .poke In oPpolitlon to the water control .tructure .t Site B location I Mrs. Roy Johnson, 275 Cypress Way Mr. Roy Johnson, 271 Cypress Way Ms. Grace S. Hallock, 489 Cypress Way M.. Betti. Gulacski, 9625 Berkshire Th. following person. spoko in opposition to the wat.r control .tructure at Site A location. Mr. Chris Prov.nzano, 1061 7th street, South Mr. Richard Jaeger, 138 Carica Road Ms. Catherine Lawhun, 204 Sharwood Drive Mr. Harold Weatherman, 172 Sharwood Driv. BCBB Executive Director Fred Vidzes repeated that the purpose of the weir is for salinity control and that it io part of the Wat.r Management Di.trict 7 Master Plan which was prepared a number of year. Igo. He .aid that the SFWMD Real Estate Division dete~in.d, through inve.tigation, that additional rights-of-way would be r.quired to , in. tall the .tructure at Site A and there might b. . probl.m with the Corps of Engin..rs in obtaining per~ltl to plac. the .tructure at that "ite since the canal II being used for navi9atlon purpo.... ße .tat.d that the BCBB recommend. Site B for the above r.asons. ",J.'.,'...":Io-..,..,.,.,.......,,..._...-, ,,",~.I""~'''''·..' ,,".., ,. '"', >,,-, , .' August 25, 1981 .' ,eoncaal the fonco. In respon.e to a question by Chairman PIstol', Mr. . , VIdzes explained that additional right-~f-way would be required to put In a fixed' crest "'eir becå'Use of the le'hgth bf crest that would be needed to carry the flow through the canal and there would not be the ~,-:. ;~.~\,;,~ '.;C , . ,~{..f ',^ , ...·f "-":'r' ,;~~7' , "e· , ~¡{: ... " '- ':~ . :',..~~~~ /~~ "~~:~ flexibility to open and close the gates. In response to a questIon by Commissioner Wimer, Mr. Vidzes said that the Water Management Stuðy Plan for Di.trict 7 indicated a location of the weir but not with any precision, and that he interpreted the study to favor Site B. Chairman pistol' said he could understand the need for the well' and , he felt that installation of one would benefit everyone. Commissioner wimer asked if it was possible to place the well' In conjunction with,the Palm River Bridge and Mr. Vidzes said that pos.i- billty was not considered but he said he felt that the weir and bridge I .hould not be combined. Mr. Barksdale said he felt it would be a mistake not to place the weir at Site B. Commissioner ~ruse suggested that the Board approve the structure at Site B with the stipulation that the fence be landscaped. In response to Commissioner Wenzel, Mr. Barksdale said that the weirs where fences have been installed have had less vandalism. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Com~i.sioner Wenzel, that the subject of the location of the proposed wnter control structure be returned to the Bi9 Cypress Basin Board and ask them to look at the feasibility of Installing the well' in conjunction with the bridge entering Pala River. Mr. Vidzes said that the design budget has already been aurpas.ed and the consultant Is already underway with the designs, plan=, and .pecifications for the proposed structure and that to investigate a veir in conjunction with the bridge would require f~rther expenditure ,_. '-. of taxpayer.' funds which would not address the ............". . .. vr . e~ 063 ;~:rg35 is.ue. Mr. Barksdale Page 30 --~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~ ... . , ... À .t', . .. ~ , . , , ,,,.Jo , . ~ , '. . . . . t , ... ~ . ~ ' , . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~ - ""'--1 --A AUCJust 25, 19B1 tOOK 063 PAtE 236 ~.Id·that Instal1ati~n ~ .·f . ,.lo~g tera benefits. . Upon call for the question the ~otlon carried 3/2 with Commie- of the structure is something that would bring alonera Brown and Pistor opposed. RESOLUTION 8l-l94 ESTABLISHING A 45 MPH SPEED ZONE ON SANTA B~RBARA BOULEVARD BETWEEN GOLDEN G~TE P~RKW^Y AND GREEN BOULEVARD - ADOPTED Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner ~rus. and carried unanimously, that Resolution 81-194 establishing a 45 MP H speed zone on Santa Barbara Boulevard between Golden Gate parkway and Green Boulevard be adopted. ~ ~. .. ~ '~,..,~ .:. ,f. . ......,;. -,,' ,< ',' ..,.31 , \:,~,t.;'}I~,!" .. ·n..'::~',"':"·"~:~-""'· ,~J! . "".,,'Îi~J..:<:.'tp..t ~,i Y'r,:-' '''t,t " 'I~,;,'t :·'!{(17t.~~~.'~.,:~~; ~!~:~~~ ," "~,"·_,"~,."""·,._.,.""_......__,.";~,,,,,,u,,,,,____,,,,__...__._...._·_...,,,,,",,....,,_....._¡...'''''',,'w,··>·.. - .. ~. .. " , ...... ..........- . " .1.1 . ~; , l - - ... ,,:J: ,~ ''t.' ,',J ;, '.'1 , . ~,~ - - --... --'~.. .....--...........-.......... --......... -.- --- -............. -..- ---- -"... -.......~ r!=':"'---"- ~ ~ , . ' . . .. ':"1 , ,r II : '" , I ~UCJust 25, 1981 .. APPROVAL or rISCAL YEAR 1982 CET~ ~DMINtSTRATIV! CONTR~CT, TITLS II-B CONTRACT, TITE IV-A CONTRACT, AND TITLE 'VII CONTR~CT - DENIED. .~DDITION~L ~CTION TA~EN DURING THE ~FTERNOON SESSION CETA Director Donald Norton explained the request for approval of rlacal Year 1982 CETA Administrative Contract, Title II-B Contract, Titl. IV-~ Contract, and Titl. VII Contract. ße said that he recently received tentative CETA allocation levels for Collier County and he noted that the CET~ Public Service Program no longer exists which cut. the CETA funds by SOt. He said he was concerned with the Contract for Title II-B, the Oeneral Training Provision, Title IV-A, Youth Employ- .ent Training Program, the Administrative Contract and the Title VII Contract which is the Private Sector Initiative Program and I. geared towards increasing the involvement of the private sector In employment and training delivery programs. Mr. Norton said he submitted a proposal and, of 35 proposal. .ubmitted, Collier County ranked second. He said the amount of money available under Title VII is $100,000. He explained that th.re were four deliverers of types of services selected statewide who will be a public sector organization, such ðS the Board of County Commissioners, and that the four contracts repreBent $~32,OOO that will be spent In Collier County for employment and training services. He said he felt confident that approximately $100,000 will be available later In the year since the summer youth program allocations do not come out until then. Mr. Norton said that with the elimination of the Public Service progra., the remaining CETA programs have sustained cuts in their ~unding levels and they will become effective October 1, 1981, and there will have to be a gradual phase down of the enroll.ent l..el on BeaK 063 rAtE 239 'age 32 .. , .... \ . 1 , \ , . . ' . . .~ . . ~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~-~~--~ .. ,~-..------~ . .' . AueJust 25, 1981 icoc 063 uMO the current program;\ In response to a question by Chairman pistor, Mr. Norton said there has been a freeze on several of the titles 80 the ~r.nd Is dropping now and will have to continu.. t Co~lssioner Brown moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel that the Board 9ive authorization to sign the Administrative Contract, and Titl. II-B, Title IV-A, and Title VII Contracts. Upon call for the question the motion was denied by a vote of 2/3 with Commissioners Wenzel, ~ru.e and Wi~er opposed. ·Se. action taken during afternoon session. ·······RECESSI 12 NOON RECONVENED: 2138 P.M. at which time Deputy Clerk Skinner was replaced by Deputy Cl.rk Davidson······· ACTION RE CETA CONTRACTS T~KEN EARLIER TillS SESSION RESCINDED AND CH~IRM~N AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE FY-8l-82 CETA ADMISTRATIVE CONTRACT, TITLE II-B CONTRACT, TITLE IV-A CONTR~CTI AND, TITLE VII CONTR~CT Commissioner Wenzel referred to action taken this morning wh.r.by it was decided not to approve the FY-Sl-S2 CETA ~dminlstratiJ. Contract, the Title 11-8 Contract, tho Title IV-A Contract nor the Title vtI Contract and said that during the noon recess he was informed by the County Manager that thø County could not arbitrarily cancel the CETA contracts. Com~i8sioner Wenzel stated that he was told that the County had to notify the Federal government that the intention of Collier County was to phase out the program., and termlnat. the contracts at the end of the year. Theretore, said Comeisslon.r Wenz.l, he would like to .ak. an appropriate motion regarding the subject CETA contracts. COIlll!asloner Wenzel .oved that the Board reconsid.r th.Ir...arll.r actlon't"'9ardlng the subj.ct CETA contract. and C~I.s10n.r "1.er ,,, ."""":jelucuntlY .econded the aotlon, tlh1ch carrl.d unant.oualy. ..~..' :. :; 1 'r ~', '" ,'., .' '''."'._.".._"..."'_,_'''_.."__..._...,;,,.._.....,..~~,.,"''<__,,.,.._..."'~'r"^ "~,."..-"..._--,_...."'.."'_.,'...._...."".....,...';.,,,.,.,""~~"','",""",."", . " , " ~U9ust 25, 1981 Co~i.sloner Wenzel ~ov.d that the Chairman be authorized to sign the aforementioned CETA contracts as was presented thl0 morning anð, a~ the aam., time, notify,tbe CETA AdminiptratJon that Collier Coun~y lntenð. to phase out CETA during the upcoming fiscal year. Co.-lssloner Wimer seconded the motion. The motion was discussed at length, during which Commissioner WQn~el clarified that it the intent of his motion that Collier County vill not renew any CETA contracts after the completion of FY 81-82. County Manager Norman stated that the subject CETA contract. repre.ent a 50' reduction from last year. Commissioner Wenzel said that if the notification is sent now, there would not be any problem associated with not executing si~ilar contracts in October of 1982. Chairman Pistor stated that the County has been gradually phasing the CETA program out anyhow, and has not been placing any new people to replace any CETA position. Mr. Norman stated that the County {s faced with a 50' cutback in administrative staff for this coming year and he added that the subsequent monetary adjustments to the budget will be discussed next week, therefore, the whole story is not before the Board at this time. However, sðid Mr. Norman, he is peraonnally convinced that CETA has been and will continue to be a very valuable program for the citizens of Collier County. He said that he Is very pleased with the work that Mr. Norton, CETA Director has been doing. He re.lnded the Board that there are no coats related to the citizens of Collier County for the operation of the CETA prog ram and that it Is the only progru that he Is aware of that is entirely Federally funded and benefit. the people of the County. ae urged the Board to reconsider their action of this morning because he considers that It would be . re.l trave.ty of justice to just abandon the progra~. &COX oœ ~241 Page 34 ----.....~-..........-.,.,~---.,.............---._........................... .v-~~ . OJ 4 "'. ", , ' ~, .", (' ; .., I .,. ~/~.'~ ¡, ~,'-!j;..\Ç;.... ~ .. ... .Jt:' " ~~~;,ri(~ . ~ "" ~ ','~ ~...~ - ..............~....__......... ~ -.ø....,,-..-.4 ,t'), , . , . .. ' , . . , \ , '... \. --J____.-......,~............4JIIbI__I__A........ . . Î. "*«,1. . ;¡'f; . ....~ . :}> . ~COI 063 PACE 242 . , " '1'he intent of the motion to,' Augult 25, 1981 was discussed and Chal~an PI.tor atated that' 'he wants to be sure that everyone under.tands that It th. motion . on the floor carries, the County will phase out CETA by the end of 1981-82 fiscal year. He asked if there are any ~ore public service ..ployees on the CETA program and Mr. Norman replied that th_r. are not, It I. entirely private sector. Mr. Norman said that Mr. Norton has picked up the lead and followed through in this regard. Com~i.8ioner Wimer suggested that Commissioner Wenzel consider amending his motion so that it is just to authorize the Chairman to sign the contracts. He suggested that the entire CETA program be workshopped in the future before any decisions are made regarding phasing out the program entirely. Commissioner Wenzel agreed, and Commissioner Wimer seconded the amended motion, which carried unanlllously. , .'J',; ~:.,;~. .-';:"" ·~~i':,,;,.: '," _,.' ", '~;~~~A"":" '.. o.~', :;_o~·f"*ì"Í.,'-.,:._, ' ~ '.~ "'. ,.' .' ~, ~~. ...;, -' ,. ' ." ,Op, T' \ . I.... , ' , . " "-'''·''~,·,-,.",....~,_"..·."..,...,·.,...""".."...,,,.,,,,_o,,,,",,,,,,,,,,,..,,",~""""~_"~"",__;_,,,,,";,""',,,.,,__,. ~ ''"'','.,,-0 "" "'''''''~'''.''''''~'''' .. ~""'._.." ~;, ."""..,""',~.......-""....'"...,_ ...."'".. ",~ <"_~,-, ,.,; ,." ~~,,~ . .... 1.. ;:'" ;"'.\ ""!':.1:tot. '.¡ . ' .., ....". ....... .,. , r, , .,:,:.,......¥ :'::,.;.... ..:.~~ ~ ,', , \"~'~' I~;',~:' 't'... '·t· .......~.,'.; . ' ~. t4'¢:? "i. August 25, 1ge1 -, " . . COMMUNITY DEVEOPMENT/PLANNING DEP~RTMENT DIRECTED TO PREPARE A PRIORITIZED WORK, PROGRAM FOR PRESENTATION NEXT WEEK, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~DMINISTRATOR TO PREPARE " CATAGORIZED LIST OF PENDING ORDIN~NCE AMENDMENTS FOR CONSIDERATION OF DELEOATION OF PREPARATION/DRAFTING RESPONSIBILITIES TO MORE ~PPROPRIATELY RELATED DEPARTMENTS, ALSO, TO PREPARE A LIST OF WORK PROJECTS PRESENTLY' DEL!G~TED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WHICH M~Y Br. MORE ~PPROPRI~TELY HANDLED ON AN OUTSIDE CONTRACTUAL BASIS RATHER THAN BY IN-HOUSE PERSONNEL Commissioner Wimer referred to a discussion regarding priorlti.. of the Planning Department's work programs which took place during the workshop session this date. He said that he believes that it is In the best inter.st of the County tor the Board to set some dir.ction in ..tting up priorities and he would lik. to have the Board consider thl. next week. He said that he has some ideas as to what should be the priorities ~f the Planning Department, beginning with the dev.lopment of the new Zoning Ordinance, and following through with the Comprehensive Plan update, Including parks, the Beach Access Master Plan, including Pelican Bay parks, the Beach Management Master Plan, and, the Impact Fee Ordinance. Referring to the Beach Access and Beach Management Master Plans, Commisslaner Wimer stated that he considers this to be the most l~portant issues before the BCC that needs to be handled and a.ked the Planning staff to reconsider the amount of time being set aside for these projects. He said that he relies on the staff to express to the Board what it is that Is requir.d to handle the projects and, although he doe. not favor spending a lot more money, h. consld.r. the Soard reasonable and stated that if what needs to be don. to follow through with the projects Is to hire more personnel, h. believes that thl. vlll be considered fairly. He said that he wanta to ....th. Board'. request. followed through in .~.tJmely manner. &CCK 063,1.CE 255 P898 36 ---...-----------.......---.............--_.............-~----- -. 4 . . P" r:'·;.. · &ft}f." " ~'" . . . ""t ~~~~~-~~~~-~~~~-~~~----~---~-~~~~'--~ " . . ~~~\:; 'f . C ,,;j~ . "'~"~;~ :".,:-~ '~~tI,_ : -~,'-',~~," -'-"'~~'''''"''"-'' . ,..... .,' . : ~ 059 PAtE 256 Auc¡ust 25, 1981 Commls.ioner Pistor said that he concur. with Commis.ioner Wimer, . e.pecially regarding beach access, adding that with respect to the interval ownership projects, he said that the more of the.. there are the more there i. a necessity for planning ahead for beach .cc.... Commissioner Wimer asked that the staff be directed to prepare a prioritized li.t of work programs for consideration by the Soard next Tu..day. Upon hearing no objections Chðirman pi.tor so dir.cted. * * * Commisslonor Wenzel left the room at this times 2145 P.M. * * . Pending Zoning Ordinance amendments were discussed, during which Coemi.sioner Wimer stated that he concurred with Planning Co~~i..ion ~ember Ed Oate., who stated this morning that it appear. that the County is putting everything on the Planning Department to prepare. Commi.sioner Wimer said that it appears to him that there are other Departments that could more effectively prepare and draft certain I a~.nd~.nt. rather than the Planning statt, i.e. Legal Departm.nt, Utilltle. Divi.Ion, Building Department, etc. Commissioner Wimer asked that the .taff prepare a catagorized llat of pending Ordinance amendments (or consideration by the Board next week regarding the delegation of re.ponsibility for preparation and/or i ,'. \1 drafting the.e amendment., accord Ing to tho mo.t appropriately related :,4' departmenta' purview. "earing no objections, Chairsan pi.tor noted that this ahould b. acco~plished tor con.ideration by the Board next Tu.tl<fay. Alao di.cu..ed was the achedule for State St.tute. tor adopting. n.w· Zoning tayn., who saSd that'.,!n order the propoaed Zoning 6rdJnanc. public hearing. r.qulred by Ordinance, .. outllnea by to .eet all tbe ~equtr...nt. . ,. '.\.,,'~:, '-;.. could not be r.ady fôr'flnal :-t- " ~la.1ner tee t '':' 01 the lav, -' ,'¡¡I,~.,. . . . ~ ',',"" .. 'a,. ,.. ., ..., "'''''O'~''''''_''''·'''~'''··_''".''''''''''''·'_~'~'>''''''N''''''.·' ,', ,," .,,,,,.. ,,,._.,.,, _,., .~"."_,,,.'~_'..,._ ',' August 25, 1981 f '. adoption before January 5, 1982. . COmaissloner Wimer. asked If there were, any objections to tbe staff .-¡,'" . ~ub.ltttn9 a recommendation for any work projects that may be mote appropriately and expeditiously handled on an outside contractual basi. rather than by in-house personnel. There were no objections forthcominge * * TIME. 2.50 P.M. - with Commissioners . * 3100 P.M. Brown and Wimer absent * NEW ONE YEAR LE~SE POR THE COUNTY WATER DIVISION WAREHOUSE AT THE MONTHLY RATE OP $200 - EXECUTION AUTHORIZED RECESS - The meeting reconvened * Com~i.sioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner ~ruse and carried 4/0, with Commissioner Wimer voting favorably upon entering the ~e.tin9 later· this .ession and Commissioner Brown absent, that the new one-year lease for the County Water Division warehouse located at 3906 Mercantile Avenue at the monthly rate of $200 be approved for execution. ~ 063 l~251 ..,. 38 ------.-._--.....--...---...-...--------....~............,........- r¡¡¡a - ~U9ust 25, 1981 t .. .. .. Commissioner Wimer entered the meeting at this times 3s03 P.M. . .. . WATER/SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WILLOUGHBY ~CRES ARE~ - ACCEPTED, EFFECTIVB THIS DATE, CLERK DIRECTED TO ISSUE WRITTEN NOTICE TO ALL AFFECTED PROPERTY. OWNERS RS ~VAILABILITY OF CONNECTION SERVICES AND GIVING THEM 90 ~YS TO CONNECT, CONSULTING ENGINEERS AUTHORIZED TO PREPARE THI PR!LIMIN~RY ASSESSMENT ROLL R! S~MI Utilities Manager Irving Berzon stated that he Is recommending the acceptance of the water/sewer improvements in the Willou9hby ~cr.. area, effective this date. He also asked the Board to direct the Clerk to issue written notices to all of the affected property owner. within the .ubject area regarding the availability of connection services and 9iv1n9 the. 90 days to complete the connection. Also, that the consulting engineers be authorized to prepare the preliminary a8sess~ent roll re same. Commissioner Wenzel so moved, seconded by rommissioner Wimer and carried 4/0, with Commissioner Brown absent. ADDITIONAL PAYMENT OF $2,893.23 TO CON5ULT^NT WARREN SILVERMAN RE OAC UTILITIES R~TE REVIEW - ~UTHORIZED Utilities Manager Irvlnq Berzon roferred to the Executive Su~mary dated 8/13/81 and recapped the contents thereof, including his recommendation that an additional payment of $2,893.23 bo paid to Hr. Warren Silverman, for consultation time and expenses regarding the CAC rate review, thereby permitting payment In full for said services. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and carried unanimously, that the above-referenced recommendation be accepted and payment in full be made to Mr. Silverman as indicated within the Executive Summary. ~ 003 u2B1 Page 3' -.....--....-......-.---..-----------------~--..-,-.......-..........-.---....... ....,. ~ '''11 .'.'t,~. . ':' '. . ~f¡' . ,;¡-:.\:.~t,~;~.' - . .'.'; ',t .":\~"~~~' , · ....\...~¡:, ,'" ..._.......... __ __ ___........ _ _ .... .... __..... _...._ _......,..." _ --1--4 _ --.... __ ~__ _ ...._..:"....'. ~. :,:tti ";:;;:~? .. ' August 25, 1981 '~ 063 PACEæ2 * * * II~ ';¡c ','I., ,:f.~ ...~;; Ooaml..loner Wl~er was excused by the Chairman at this timo. 3.12 P.M. * * * þ,:" REPORT , PRESENTA~ION OF FINDINOS or SPACE PLANNING , ACTION COMMITTEE RC COVERNMENT CENTER EXPANSION PROGR~M - BOARD TENTATIVELY ~PPROVED POLIZZI/REERY PHASE I STUDY RE SP~CES REQUIRED, POLIZZI/HEERY AUTHORIZED TO rREP^RE FINAL PROGRAM FOR PRE8F.NT~TION IN TWO WEE~S ¡,:.; Administrative Assistant Neil Oorri11 explained that, pur.uant to Board direction, a citizons advisory committee was formed to review the Collier County space program. He said that the committee was formed, in spite of the fact that there waG a general lack of interest displayed on the part of the public with respect to participation on this volunteer co~ittee. He said that the individuals that did volunteer to serve have worked diligently, and are to be highly commended. Mr. Oorrill said that the Chairman of the committee, Alva Dlttrick, Is prepared to make a presentation of the result. of the 9roup·. review of the Polizzi/Heery space study. Mr. Dorril1 thanked the entire committee and especially those who worked so hard all through the entire project, on behalf of the County Manager'. office. Chair.an Pistor reiterated that thanks on behalf of the Board, adding that this Is a most Important issue and that it could very well concern the expenditure of a great deal of money. Mr. Dlttrick referred to the memorandUM dated August 25, 1981, which contains a co~plete analysS. of the committee's finding. related to the Polizai/Heery space .tudy for the Collier County governaent complex. Mr. Dittr!ck recapped information within the ce.or.ndua Which ,~~ Ir reeoltent of three .onthe of ~.etlnQe, Inveetlgatlone, end ~yaloel ';.I~¥ .J.lutlon. of the var:lou. .pace 'area. to be enlarged. He It.teð th.t~;j;' , . . ,~,-';"~:~ "'"Je 40 ..: ~ÎÎ".) '. '(J " Y-·_:4; , 'e . .. '" ,. ~jI'. "I , " August 25, 1981 . he va. sorry that there waø'not more Interest shown from the cltisen. o~ the County, adding that those who did attend the ~eetln9. worked very hard and he noted that ..o.t meet.ln<J. ~ere attended by l2 ..~b.r. at,a, tl.e. Mr. Dittrlck Introduced the following ....b.r. who vere in attendance this Morning' Bettle C;ulacslk Leigh PlullJl.r Dr. Floyd Peterson ."Joan &.n ton Steven Martin Mr. Dittrick .tated that the Citizen's Space Committee was broken into .ub-committees, and that the following area. of concern were studied by each sub-committees Criminal Justice (Courts and Sheriff'. Department), ~dminlstratlon (operation. of the County Manager) and, Constitutional Officers. Mr. Dittrick .tated that it wos the consensus of the space .tudy committee that the consultants, report (Polizzl/Heery) was thorough and well done, although, it may be a little too optimistic, .Ince input was taken largely from the County officials and .taff ....b.r.. He said that the committee feel. that tho Polizzl/He.ry projection of the need for 294,698 .qJft. of apace by 1996 seems incompatible with the population growth of 60,000 (72') for this same period. Øe added that there had been little attention to personnel incre.se. anticipated and that this is a relationship to space need.. ne said that the reco~endation of 178,000 additional square ft. must be 'ustlfled by occupancy or the purpo.e for which the space Is to be used. Be also added that the members of the committe. were ever mindful of the awe.ome financial commitment projected. ~COK 063 PAt£263 Page .1 - .... --- - -- .... ... .... ............ -- -- .............-... ..... .....- --~ .... - .... -.....- ... ... .... .... .... - .... .... ~...... ..- . !' It. . " .... , " . . ;:J'iI\ .. . , "~.~f?:' . ' . , . . . . "- - ,'}:"'}'~" , , . , "", ,~/~}:,"\. ~~~~~-~~.~~~----~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~ ',_/l[f~~~ , '1:... . ' August 25, 1981 .. 'aéœ 009 ,AtE2M Mr~ Dittrlck stated that the committee feel. that the .xpan.i~n program should be planned for ten years with provisions made for further d.velopment as required for fifteen years. Regarding the jail, he commented that the committee has endorsed the .ingle cell conceptr and, that all prisoners should be housed In on. c.ntral facility, thus eliminating the Immokalee Gtockade. Regarding the Courts area, Hr. Dittrick stated that tho committee feel. that the projected increase of 27,000 sq. ft. 18 extremely ambitious and that they recommend that the jusiclary areas be re.tudied. However, said Mr. Dittrick, the committee agrees that the construction of a Criminal Justice Center should be given urgent priority, including the Courts, Jail, Sheriff's Department, State Attorney, Public Defendor and other ancillary services. He added that the centrali%ation of the operations in the newly constructed center would free space in existing buildings to be renovated for additional office space required by other departments. Mr. Dittrick atated that m.etl~g the demands for additional spac. need. will be a costly venture and the commltee believes that the projections by department heads are overly ambitious and that there I. -fat- throughout the Polizzi/Ha.ry report that can be tri~med. Mr. Dlttrick also referred to a letter from Judge Carlton which Indicates his disagreement with the committee'. projections of 7-8 judge. in the next ton-fifteen year., and states that he Is Inclined to .gree with the Pollzzi/Keery projections of 10-11 instead. This was dl~usseð at length, during which Hr. Dittrick stated that he va. not pl....d th.t Judge Carlton hað rec.iv.d a copy ofth. co..ltt..·.' ~.,~!t before it was given to the BCe, as the delivery to the BOC,va. ~h.....I,n.ent that the coa.ltt.. va. ,iv.n. . "t·r.,., . , " 4, """ . ..j .. ~~ z'J" . .~;:,?- , ~ .:-..~'.:1j:""""~~':.:~:~~'.""':; ..~.. . . Jt.. Åf ~;: . .. ~ .. :--,,"....;... .. ! AU9ust 25, 1981 Mr. Dittrlck pointed out varlou. areas throughout the o Pol1~zl/"eery study which he referred tó' aa area. with -tat- in them, I.e. State' Attorney'Office" (projected aa needing 3-l/2 times th. present amount of space, Public Defender (1-1/2 times),' Clerk (more than 1-1/2 times), and, Supervisor of Elections (3 times). Øe said that he feels that the.e ambitious projections are resultant of interviewing and subsequent acceptance of department heads Ideas a. to what will be needed, explaining that In order to insure adequate space the projections were probabaly increased somewhat jU8t to be sure. ~nother area where the committee i8 not satisfied Is the apparent proliferation of projected space for libraries, including a library for the Judges, State AttorneYI County ^ttorney, Central Law Library, Public Defender, and the JaIl. He said th,t thø committee consider. I this to be too much space allocated for lIbraries. ^nother area that the committee is concerned with is the projected space of 6,600 sq. ft. for a cafeteria, adding that while a cafeteria may be desirable, he questions the need for 6,600 sq. ft. Regarding financing for the expansion, Mr. Dittrlck stated that the committee did not feel that they had the expertise or sufficient InforMation on which to base any kind of study in this area, however, they will offer general support for the financing, whichever method I. established but they have not formulated any recommendations or conclusions as a committee. Mr. Dittrick made a personal statement at thi. time, including the fact that he believes that the BCC will have to .ake final ðecislons and the -bottom linew will be the question, ·WIll it merit the general public and will It generate public support?-. He said that he, , personnally, doubts that a bond issue will be supported, and he adðed ~ 063 ~265 Page C3 -..... - - - - -..--'- - - -.- -- ~- -- - -- .-- - - - - -- --- ~........ -- --~~........ . , .. ":¡<t. ,J¡,.¡, : .;I '+~, .: ',,v. ,<'s- 'y ~.~; ~,'~'r,' '. ...,;.t ~.',~~. .,: '.,., ...1 . . . --A;~.... _ __..... ........... ...........- ........... - ..... ...... -- - - - ... .... - - - - -- - -........ - "';',-,-, ,',,: ': etœ 083 fACE266 ~ugust 25, 1981 i ¡ ~ " ~. . . ( " ~, that any .ethod whic~ requires support from the taxpayers i. also doubtful. In answer to Chairman Pis tor, he said that he and the co~lttee are willing to continue to work for the Bce and do whatever they can to help, if the Board modifies the plan and -squeezes out the rat- . County Manager Norman stated that he agrees with Mr. Dittrick regarding lack of expertise in financial aspects, on the part of the committee, however, he is hoping that they will be helpful in the .election of a financial advisor within the next three weeks and that he hopes that the County can continue to count on the committee'. support. He said that the next step will be for the Board to decide on the plan that is acceptable to them, and then to select the architect and to have the full financial picture defined, including construction costs, etc. He ftaid that once the schematic design is prepared, and f the master plan developed, there can still be change. made regarding Individual space allotments. He .uggested that individual are.. in question be addressed at that time. ne reminded the Board that every day this project is delayed costs money in terms of inflated con.truction costs. Mr. Leigh Plummer, member of the Citizens Spacs Commltt.e, .tated that he takes exception to Mr. Dittrick'. comments and that they do not nece..arily reflect the feeling of the entire committee. ne said that he also øbjects to the personal comments made by Mr. Dittrlck and that If he had known that this would take place, he would have prepared a .lnorlty report tot pre.enta,tion.. He said that he con.lder. ~r.on.l , .,. .. . .' .. . co.aent. out of place and that he do.. not fesl. that the Polllzl/Herry '. .' ,: ~ ',: . .. . r ,'t: r,. ';.~, -,;;. ~!.d~1t~'.rd:~>~:~ ,< . ,'''t~y contain. any -rat- vlth the posdble exception of the flft..n\~",~. '. Jf,.' .,. .' ,,:.~ .. . '.' 'I :."';::.>\.:.)~', ~ ,> : ;:,~N~ar projection.. He Hid that .any of the people on the CO_I~tf,~o ::r,r{':.,~r;;¡~:"<;~,,. ;.'*t..}~".' ,;" _ ",'. .,', . ''... ;11 ;:..' ,- ,. '''>:/'ltge 44 '.~ '?I;.~;:>,\; .. 1, ';'>.ii- .;~." 'Y", I ~-:$' ~. '<.;r;;,'1 .?~.' ~;'~ . '.:,:?~~, :1":", ~r;:' , "~,i'4 . ,'t :.:~~.."" ." ...-.....', .p" , ,~...._~.... ,f"'-~ ,,~~.......~.....a·"·,,·~· .'..... :.r';.~.;. '_':.: '··~7~~;.,~"~,{,:,.:~·~', , , ~,;;' '-, '."" ~.~.~;: .:.....'"'-"'.. ~"_. Ad. .'l~ ',_ · .'~..'" .:'~""l~) lIU<uot 25. 1981 \~'" .\.~ 'Øl not feel that the projections should go further than 10 years. ~~ ;;:'(j,'( ··..·T·:··.. .. .1 Mr. Plummer said that his job on the committee was to analyze the department needs under" "the County Mañager;' and that he has found that ,there Is a great deal of .catching up· that needs to be done in ~any of the.e departments. He said that most are overcrowded, and that the worst is the Health Department and the Museum. ~lso, in need of more .pace, as soon as possible, is the Building Inspection Department and the Planning Department. Mr. Plummer said that he only considers that there are two departments within the entire complex which fall under the County Manager with sufficient space allocations, the Veterans Affairs office and the Utilities Division. There was a lengthy discussion regarding the comments made during the aforementioned presentations, including a statement by Clerk Reagan that he believes that the basis on which projections for the Criminal Justice areas should be made should come from the fac~s presented through the State Attorney's Office, because he feel. that this I. the office from which all the others will receive their Individual work loads, i.e. the number of judges that will be required is based on the number of cases handled in the State Attorney's office, as are the number of courtrooms that will be needed. Clerk Reagan also took e~ceptlon to the term -fat- being applied to his projections for required space. County Attorney pickworth addressod the term -fat- in relation to the projections for libraries, and attempted to explain the need for each of those outlined earlier by Mr. Dittrick, fro~ the point of vlev of an attorney and a ~e~ber of the Bar A.sociation. The.e llbrari.. , vere di.cussed at length, during which Deputy Chief, Ray Barnet~, of the I Sheriff's Department, added that the library for the jail i. not for ~ œs ~2B7 PAfJ. 4 S _ ~........- _ _ ___ _ ....- ..... ...... .... __ ~ __ -.....- _....-_ _._ _.-...... _......-..... __ _ ~ IP""""-"'- . , ' þ. . . ~ugust 25, 1981 'CC1 063 nœ268 the employees, it is , intended for use by the inmates, as the Law mandate. that a legal library be accessable to these prisoners, and at this time, if a prisoner wishes to go to the Law Library, it mean. a deputy having to go along as a guard. It was explained by ~r. Pickworth that many of the projected libraries could be multi-purpose rooms, and that perhaps one or t.wo of them could be a joint venture, however, none were what he would consider as -fat- and that they are all needed to serve an individual purpose. He concluded by stating that, at the present time, the 10ga1 library system in the complex i. inadequate and requires upgrading in order to meet all the requirement. of the respective agencies involved as well as the total legal community In Collier County. ~r. Norm~n interjected that this is an area that can be finalized after the general mission of the architect I. prepared and preliminary schematic design and master plans are drawn up, and that he would not like to see the project bogged down at this ti.e just because the number of .quare feet or the actual placement of the.e library areas cannot be agreed upon at this time. Mr. Daryl Bailes, representing Pollzzi/H.ery, explained the cost. that will be incurred if the project Is delayed further, and øaid that he would like conceptual approval of the plans thus far, and that he would come back to the BOJrd in the next week or two with some finalized plans, designs, etc. {or formal approval. Øe said that he vlll continue to work with the members of the committee In order to work out agreeable co.promises In any area of concern, however, he vl.he. that the Board realize that there will be an opportunity to .ake . , alnor change. all throUCJh the progress of the proiect. Ife .ald that" ;" :'<- '. .....,1-~: the entlr. de.lgn will have -flexibility· and that all the ar.a.of ' concern can b. worked out to the .atl.factlon of all concerned. , ' ,'''';t:' ,~,.~ ; 4"', <,I.'" 'f': ';¡~, ' '~M, ~. :~;J . ,ag. .. "........-..- .~-..._........._- "-·-'""_""''"''';¡''''''''';"__'h'.~__·'*'''''''''~''''"~· August 25, 19ô1 , '" '~ Mr. Balles explained the differenc~ In theories for basing the 'number of projected judges for Collier County that have caus.d certain ,:.... concerns to beexpr,ss,d ~th, by ~he Jußges and the committee. He thÀt Judge Cart'ton Is opposed to basing projections on historical caseload numbers converted to a ratio, based on population and current caseloads. Mr. Bailes stated that the ratio between caseload and population has not been static in the past, thus, the Judges fe.l this Is not the optimum methodology to use. Mr. Bailes said that he tends to rely on the agencies, department heads and personnel involved, because he feels that they know beat about what they need. He said that there is a 6ubstantial difference between the sub-committees report and that of the Judges which could result in an impact of several thousand square f.eet. He said that, if the answer is not forthcoming today, this will have to be settled aome time in the near future. Chairman pistor said that he has received another letter from Judge Carlton, which indicated that he feels that the space study requirements must be broadcast over the next fifteen years for the JUdges in order to avoid problems similar to what ia happening now ten years down the road. He said that Judge Carlton urges the optimistic figures be used, rather than those of the sub-committee. Chairman Pistor said that Judge Carlton has stated in his letter that, -to allow enough square footage to grow into would be so much easier and wiser than to build for ~oday and then worry about tommorrow-. He said that Judge Carlton states, -the committee report of two additional judge. over the next fifteen years is ridiculous and unacceptable-. This letter was discussed at length, as was Appendix IV of the c~!ttee'. ~ '003 ~2S9 '89. 47 - - -- ~..... -.... - - -..... - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - ---...... -- - _...._~ .....-...~ . , , . . _ _ --..........--......... .-.....-..... --- - - - - - - ..... - - - ..... -.,...................... -... , 1~ August 25, 1981 !COK 063 PACE 270 report, after which Chairman pistor asked what the Board i. being asked ~or at this time. County Manager Norman suggested that the committee continue to 91ve Input and work with the architect and the consulting team. He .sked the Board to instruct the consultants to come back to the Board with e program that provides the flexlbiiity required and at the .ame time allows the program to move forward and continue into the design pha.e. Chairman pistor stated that he feels that the area of prime concern is in regards to the Judiciary areas ðnd that the rcat of the report is fairly definito. He said that the other differences can be worked out. He said that he favors moving forward and giving approval to go along with all the rest of the proqram and ask the committee to meet further with .11 concerned and settle the matter of the Judicial concerns. Mr. Dittrick stated that although there were 80me negative aspects with regard to his report, it is still considered to be a good report (Polizzi/Herry Study). He again refer~~d to the dependence of roport. from County Officers and staff members as contributing to what he considers a. the weaknesses in the consultants study, which entailed looking into the future for optimum needs. He said that the initial projections will always be on the high side and this Is why he reterr. to .ODe areas a. having -fat-. He said that the committee 1. e.ger to continue to work with the interested partie. in order to co~e to .o~e kind ot understanding. "" " :", ..-', " ...,,:i~ , ;'¡'i:~::i " ~':-~:'~;;~ ,: "~ ~.' < ~~ft -~---~' '.";1. f,' . .:/ ,,~-,-;' ";fl.,, ';", Mr. Dortil1 stated that what i. needed today in order to .aintaln :.h' '. thec~ntractual c~it.rent. and the schedule of critical date., 1:-.~,_~·\t. ~ ~: ':':'),;þ'~,,: . _ :._ ..' ,i-I,,: _ ¡{. , "\;"SnëlúcUnc¡ the pre.ent situation ""ereby' the County t. Involve4'''!r{:¡.t, f.:"">.,,,~,;\;,., :'"r,{fJ¡ .I:.~,\.;, .~. I :,::',~i~tf>- C~';,-. ",J-' .....'t >.~~::';:.:. ;" ~ ..._--,-,,,,," " __,_'" """h,,,", "..~;,.."'""~<",;,__,,,,,~,",,__..._."~,,,,,,,,,,__ ,",. ",'. _, ,,,,,,_,,..,,,,<,,..,,~""',..,""""'_"";""""".""''' August 25, 1981 extension pertod with the construction program management flr~, tbe arcbltectual firm which has be.n .elected for entering Into negotia- ".. tlon. and with whom th.re is no contr~ct at this time, i. the Board'. approval of t~e -space program- which has been submitted thus far by Pollzzl/Reery. Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner ~ruse and' carried 4/0, with Commissioner Brown absent, that tentative approval be 91ven for the space program as presented by Polizzi/Heery and that tbe consultant be authorized to continue with Phase I in order to make a presentation for approval of the final space program within two we.k.. County Manager Norman stated that the committee's concerns will all be addressed in the interim. EXPENDITURE FOR ADVERTISING RE EXPLANATION OF ·NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES· - ~PPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF $415 Following a brief explanation from County Manager Norman, Commissioner ~ruse moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0, with Commissioner Brown absent, that the expendtiture of $415 for advertising costs regarding an explanation of the WNotice of Proposed Property Taxes· be authorized. REGULAR BILLS PAID Pursuant to Resolution 81-150 adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on May 26, 1981, the following checks were issued through Priday, August 25, 1981, in paym.nt of routine blllsl FUND - AMOUNT CHEC~ NOS. County Checks CETA 11580 11857 7780 - 7905 $l,105,97S.65 $ 25,798.76 WJK 003 _ 211 'ag. ., - ~ - -- -..... -.....--......,- -- -- -- -- - -..--- - - -- .....~......---..- --- . , I~" j¡......""'...,_______,~'".".," , " .. .. , I ø " . '... , . \ "to,.,. ..... . ; :~:ri),~t(;:ï} ~ ....--- ---.-... -- ..... -- ...... ..... ..... ..... - .... -.. ..... -'" ... .... -- ..... --- _--.. -..1___......... ~_.... .' , " ,h':_j_ ",;.r~ \ ;,;,-;~'.;, >~·!:'.1 August 25, 1981 :,;:fJ:~:,i;~(/~\.' ~ÞOi 0G3 tAtt ~72 "(~:!*f(':::~l SPECI~L BILLS RE HEALTH SERVICES FOR INMATES AS SUBMITTED BY SHERIFr -". APPROVED FOR PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,973 CommissIoner WImer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried 4/0, with Commissioner Brown absent, that the special bills re hospital, ~edlcal, pharmaceutical and ambul~nce billings submitted by the Sheriff be approved for payment In the amount of $18,873. .>;;-:1".' ;,\, '. ".',~ I?..~'. ' .,,10: '!f~T:'~ ,"',.,~rso:, , ,;þj ?;"):;~hr? '.';:, , _';".,:,,:;i'.::,y, r1"....,...."'~'" ..'~. ....._-'_._~ BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 81-143 RE PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM - ~DOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,767 CommIssioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried 3/1, with Commissioner Brown absent and Com~lssioner Wenzel opposed, that Budget Amendment No. 81-143 establishing budgetary line items for the Public TransIt System, be adopted in the amount of $4,767. '. "; {";:~';';":"" . . "~: ~ ?' " '\I . ~r ,'. ~~~~:.i,~...,,, ~ ','..~.,.. ~,·rlf£lJ'· , i~';~;.-·t~··_~·;-~'~1'-'{>1~~· " -.. ........ ~,..""~".,-.",,,,,,.,,,.;...,,,,.",,;-,,,,,, .. .>i.'_.____;_.,_~...;,_"',.;,'" ,......,~..".~.._..'.'"-_.._.,",~-",;'''''-'''''',.-..."._,.....,''',...."~.,'....~.".'_.,,.";..-.., J \;/ {" jI,~\~ ",' ~r¡ ,-. \;:~ :,~; -., 1", , ... '-:9" , :¡"~,:,'b(}~'~f~'" .' . . " ..: , ,- ~.......... -................. ..... -- - ..... - -- .... -- .... - - .......- 'I':;:.. . (""~ ~', "'.' . " ~t~:Ob'g tAtEZ74 AUCJust 25, 1981 " "~";I'''f' .~ ~'~·rv" ". ~r ;~ llr~~ ~ ~,' t~ ~ 'i '1.~~~~ ~...J.' ~ ~¡Y ¥ i# 1 , "~n"-j~~l" ~', t;",,~ . ......." ....., t.,' ~ i". '>t....,., '.. (HEALTH C~R£ or '. BUDGET AA£NDEMENT NO" 81-144 RE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT INMATES) - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,873 Commi.sioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commis.ioner Kruse and carried 4/0, with Commissioner Brown absent, that Budget Amendment No. 81-1~4, covering cost of medical services for Inmates, be adopted in the ..ount of $18,873. ..:-,'''''''; .<*t,~,' ' ':'~'*': . ~f.' '. ..-,.' '. ,. ... ,-.\""" .-- ~ .. -. -,.... '--'" I , " '... .. . ~. . ,., .' . -. , ~ ' , ,.. . \ . . . . " ""IJ'i;¡"" '. " :';\~:jÍ;:":' . ;.,,' '. t..(~,:~. - ~ > - r:· :~' b Ob'3 07'6 , '. ŒE4'1 > '" v ,. ~' . , . . . , . August 25, 1981 , " . . . BUDGET AMENDMENT NO....,,81-145, R£ MUSEUM GIFT SHOP RES~LE ITEMS - ADOPTED IM THE AMOUNT OP $200 .,;. ~ Comalssioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and '. carrSed ~/O, with Commls.ioner Brown absent, that Budget Amendment No. 81-145 re Museum Gift Shop re.ale Items, be adopted in the amount of 8200. .J '.~ *;~, t~i " ! :.t. " . ~¡ ....,. ~! . '~:~ it'! :";:.~ ..~ /i '1 f f ',i.:: ¡. .'I¡. I -.··w.._"'_'·.....__.."",'.._...""""""M..,··...·'.,·,~",·"'.',i".."''',',,,,,;~;....,, ;"'"",~". ~~:,\~. , ' ~ ;.' ~ ,It<' " ....;~ ,\;-, · · ..,: i¡"'_~ ',: . · . '~~~~~~-~~~~-~-~~~~-~--~~~~-~-~ , , -.\ .. , AU9ust 25, 1981 ;~ ~Ot 083 PAŒ278 t l' to BUOO!"1' AMENDMENT NO;'81-146, RE COMMUNITY BLOCK GR~N'1' PROGRAM (SALARIES) - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $67 Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and càrried 4/0, with Commissioner Brown absent, that Budget Amendment No. 81-146, re increased salaries within the Community Development Block Crant pro9ram, be adopted in the amount of $67. /,~~!~y"" , ~~~~":',,A~ ..~. " .....' . ì'!'~~ .,\ ~ . ¡, I,'....', ""'" ~,-'...." I .. \. , .. . ~~ /:; , ,. ;\~';\:;I'(" " '<'I'r.t ,,", li~\~, t " .? 1 " "k ~sr,~' :..-;......,-------- ------ --- ------ /~.-,~'\i,~" ~~ . :';'1':' ;': ~ . 0 ~ August 25, 1981 ",·;,;,t:· acoK BD 'AC£ 2BO , .~ ", BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 8l-l47, RE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT RELATED ITEMS RE FY 80-81) - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT or $13,030 . . . '.;~. , .. ~/'¥~; (SALARY 'Ih :Wf} Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and ,) carried 4/0, with Commissioner Brown absent, that Cudget Amendment No. 81-147, re Building Inspection Department, for overtime, retireMent, and related øalary line items to complete FY 80-81, be adopted In the amount of $l3,030. "'", ,....~ ,,;~ ""~,J 'IJ , 'f, ,,"> :..£i "~' t. ,).t' o ~ . " " .' " 'j: " /'; . }1 ::<~;/.~-:,:~~~~-l.·· ,}~1t,,', '.~.;;~~: ~*..,tt::"_'~,L·,,"'~ ~', ': ii..~:'~.:. it', ':';~ ....." . 1""k,I.",,1l', ; '~~!,;~':'~Ciol'< ' '7"t...~~¡ ,'~,~¿:(~~\~' --.:. . ')~¡,'tl,:,~,\ ¡, ~f~;~~T.:.:,~,~.. ' , ,~.,:,. !ì /.¡, ~(~:..' '6:ì.~' - .........- --- - ......., ""," -- ,._..,~..._.._---_.."...-"._,.- . .."....... ..............". - .. I, '. I '. ,.' .... .. ,: ~ , , . . .' ~ . . AU<Just 25, 1981 : ~* , BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 8l-148 RE PLANNING DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES) - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT or or $1,288 .Coamlss10ner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner ~rus. and carried ~/O, with Commissioner Brown absent, that Budget Amendment No. '81-148, re Planning Department to more accurately reflect current expenditures, be adoptod in the amount of $1,288. . , ! ~".< ..:, ~ .äte{'SS' ,,~-.~'tI...."": ...~~.., '",wic"r;,i'-, I;'tt" , . '::;S:r~'+;)~:~:;:;:;.i1: '_:J--'*"'t"'....f.,:,..¡. -.. _ _ _ J"':~""'. '- '. :: ·:(f"~:' ~: ..~ .,~.. .. ., "" ""'." H'" '",';,~,~,.;_......_"""'........"'...__.',."'*"'^""'..,.~._,.,"""'.""'.,"".'".~~....... \ Commi.sion.r Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and '. -.. ,. ..' . . ", \ ..,. ..;;, ~ ' . . \ '.. . . . ~¡j. 8~DC:~~~~~~;1-149 RE CIRCUIT JUDGE CA::::: :::~::1 rNCREABl8\.·~: ¢. ' ' Ii CURRENT IXPEtJDITUR¡:;S) - ADOPTED IN THB ~MOUNT or $l,042. .. , ";,: ,:}::. carried 4/0, with Commissioner Brown absent, that Budget Amendment No. 81-149, re Circuit Judge Carlton, providing for salary increases and current expenditures, be adopted in the amount of $1,042. v~: ~, fIl:'! ;,;," , 1· !<'l~~."'" !.' Sr':'" . 'iJ'" :~.t-", , '. , ... \ "" ,I !c:t 063 ,Atf286 aUDOET'AMENDMENT NO~'81-lS0 RE BUILDING INSPECTION DEP~RTMENT, (UNANTICIPATED CONTRACTORS LICENSING EXAMINATION) - ~DOPTED IN THE AMOUNT or $5,615 August 25, 1981 Co~missloner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried 4/0, with Commissioner Brown absent, that Budget Amendment No. 81-1S0, prov1din9 for unanticipated Contractors Licens1n9 examination, be adopted in the amount of $5,615 /, I " t!'" ' .~-- '~-., . . .... . ,; t,' ifit'",.:, ' , ';, "',}.",f,;', " ''''i.'\·'; I' , ~.' ,"'.' '. -. , .~.. ",' . '.'J_~, ·:~.l._ I ,¡-~,,_ ., " ,.,~ . ~- - /'< . ,. ,';:~" '. , .. "·l:1 : '. i(¡.;,)ij.' ':(,\',~f~ '~I": ..",:ì~tJ,,;.ìi'¡'h'~· ,>,. '/J¡.l':.{-: ';~ , , . . ,'..; !;¡l¡I1:,);t,~ ~~~~-~~~~-~~~-~~~~--~~~~~~--~ ,- . '., ,. Au<¡uat 25, 1981 IUOOIT ".,.ENDMENT NO. 8l-151 RE ZONING DEPARTMENT (WAGE ~DJUS'I'MBNTS' '. ADOPTED IN ~H£ AMOUN7 or $7,370 Co~l.sioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and c.rrleð 4/0, with Commissioner Brown absent, that Budget ~endm.nt 81-151, re Zoning Department, providing for wage adjustments, be aðopteð in t,he amount of $7,370. ",-."""__"""".~-,.,-""",.,>.,",""".."-.".,,,,~,,..~" "",~~ \-..#',.......~.,.,. . . : h ...,;,¡....;.,~ _ _ _............. _ ..... _ _ _ _ _ _ _... _ _ _ _ _ _ --._ J __ -................... ':;:;:~~A-f';;. .', ~r""'j',. "!~'~. +~. , .,~:~,':;J"~:.¡C".· ", :~, " ',I,"'~ r~. :'" ~'" ; '4 ,,\,~\""Ir' .:,' \I~"" ·""r~o'''1·''-' ·,::t' '.t,~ Ob'3 tACE290 August 25, 1981 .·;i!~\~!~:i·i: 8UOOET MENDMENT NO."81-l52 RE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (WAGE ~DJUSTMENTS)- ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF S6,863 Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Commissioner Kruse and carried 4/0, with Com~issioner Brown absent, that Budget Amendment No. 8l-152, r. Planning Department, providing for wag. adjustments, be adopted in the a~ount of S6,863. "/ ·;;::.;!~~1~ntf ':< "9',:;11, "·'~"""'··l'·;'"·""""__~_"""_"'·"""""'^'"'_'~'·~'_"i"'_._."'_;~,._,~..."_"",,_.,.,,"_,,, ^U<Just 25, 1981 . , , , ,. .. ,",' ~.~;:,¡.~,:,' ,"t '" ,J ,"~:'::t~··~!t·, ~; :.', '~~.: &CCl 063 fACE 292 '1Î \ BUDGET AM!NDMENT NO. 8l-153 RE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~DMINISTRATION (EMPLOYEE EXPENSES RE ry 80-81) - ~DOPTED IN THE AMOUNT or 82,909 , ~. l C01IIIDlssioner Wimer moved, seconded by Comlalssloner !Cruse and ........-..-. ---,--..... ........ -"'-- -- -,....... ..... ..... ........ - ..... - -.. - /' ' 'I , I " carried 4/0, with Commissioner Brown ab.ent, that Budget Amendment No. " 81-153, re Community Development/Administration, providing for employee expenses to complete FY 80-Bl, be adopted In the amount of $2,909. ... .;j Î , .~~ ...... ~ I " ~ ~} . ~~ ,) " 1 ~.. ,.(~ '~'i;' "'~¡' ,itJ ',,·,I.~"'· d, ~!, , ,t.. , "I¥tJ , :.:~: .\,. ..',~::. . ., >:~'.':, >~>.r} " . . ' ." , ..' . ' I~; "'" ~ jo_ ".i ',\':'i,:,,~:"',: ~~~º:j.tì)';'.f;¡:.~, .:,"f'f,! ::~" .::'~, , . .,' 'i' ),,·,Jt~'~'$,¡I..~t:fj·""I'd''''¡r··~~~'.' .' .,' '.' ~:., ;~-t :¡':: ~,:,';),:" ·,~;~._~·1~~~i"::·~;~~:';'~~:.tt~ '~?/:': ~" ~; . ):',~:"',~':,~~i~:,.š :'.~~,r , , , ~" ., . ".' \, <~J;;' ~ ~;·~l~;~:X .," .j~..:' .,~ ,', ::'89- IO~';$fi' . r~.~".', f ,;;., ~.~ "'n ,:.,. ," \" ,;',,1:, ,,', '~~~'¿;l-<~'~;' . ,-'. -,':: :~~'~;~:,r:'f;.:~;> .'. ,: '~St ' . ,cœ Ob-g 1m294 . , PROPERTY APPRAISAL AQJUSTHENT BOARD AEARINGS SCHEDULED FOR SEPT. 24 , 25, 19811 COMMISSIONERS WENZEL, ~RUSE AND WIMER APPOINTED TO PAAB AND COMMISSIONER WENZEL TO BE CHAIRMAN. CHAIRMAN PISTOR AUTHORIZED TO TRAWSMIT tETTER TO SCHOOL BO~RD REQUESTING NAME OF MEMBERS WHO WILL SERVE ON BO~RD , '. . '. . . ,,' ,.,.' ' . ~~ ~~~-~~-~~~-~~--~-~-~~~~~~~~~~~~-~- . , ' \~tf >r·1 ~ugust 25, 1981 : t ..,~ ~ :.".'t" ~;. Æ ~. .' ,,\:, I Pursuant to a request from tho Clerk's office, Chairman pi.tor stated that he has investigated tho available dates on which to hold the Property Appraisal Adjustment Board hearings, and that September 24 and 25, 1981 are tho only dates which will meet the requirements of the County and the School Board. Also discussed ~as the need Cor a letter to be sent to the School - .' .. r Board requestlnq the names of those School Boar~ members ~ho will .erve with CommIssioner Wenzel, ~ho shall be the Chairman, and Commissioner. ~ruse and Wimer, ~hom Chairman Pistor has selected as the County'. appointees on said Board. After a brief discussion, Commissioner Wimer moved, seconded by Comaissioner Kruse and carried 4/0, with Commis.loner Brown ~bsent, that the above-roCereneed dates be approved on which to hold the Property Appraisal Adjustment Board hearinqs, that the afore~entloned appointees fro~ the BCC be approved, includinq the deslqnated chal~.nship, and, that a letter requesting the names of the School Board's members who are to serve on the 5ubject Board be authorized. ONE ELECTRONIC TYPEWRITER WITH EXPANDED MEMORY AND B~TTERY P~CK AND ONE ELECTRONIC TYPEWRITER WITH STAND~RD MEMORY ~ND B~TTERY PACK - AUTHORIZED FOR IMMEDIATE RE UISITION FOR BCC OFFICE ',:;; ~, ",~~ Co~l.sloner Wi~er moved, seconded by commissioner Kruse and carried 4/0, with Co~missioner Brown absent, that the two (2) electronic typewriters reque.ted by the ~~ini~tr~tl~e Aide to the and outlined more fully within the Executive Su..ary, be .'....~,,', " t·':- , , AU<Just 25, 1981 authorized for immedinte requisition for the Board of County Commissioners' office. " ;, - ' " PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 29, 1981 RE NO-SMOKING ORDIN~NCE ,: Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried 4/0, that the public hearing be scheduled for September 29, 1981 for consideration of the adoption of the new proposed No-Smoking Ordinance. RESOLUTION Bl-l9S, ESTABLISHING AND APPOINTING AN ADVISORY COMMITTE! TO THE MARCO ISL~ND BEAUTIFICATION UNIT - ADOPTED County Attorney Pickworth explained the method of selection of the members to the Advisory Committee re the Marco Island Beautification Unit. He said that the Committee shall be made up of one represen- tative who shall be appointed by the President of each of the following interested organizationsl Marco Island Chamber of Commerce, the Marco Island Civic Assoc., the Marco Island Taxpayers Assoc., the Marco Island Jaycees1 and, the Marco Island Women's Club. He said that there will also be an alternate member chosen by the BCC and that the responsibility of membership shall be up to the five aforementioned organi zations. Commissioner Kruse moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and carried 4/0, that Resolution 81-195, establishing and appointing an advisory committee to th& Marco Island Beautification Unit be adopted. W¡( 003 N:t295 'ag. .2 -....-----.-_~-----------...._--.-------.-...-......--,..............__-. . , .>~-- " , . .. .- , , ¡,;á.t, '~".......' .,.,................ II< ........,.,... ... ..... ~" ~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~Ot 063 PACE 300 August 25, 1981 CERTIFICATES or CORRECTION TO THE 1980 TAX ROLL - APPROVED FOR CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE ,Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Wimer and carried ~/O, with Commissioner Brown absent, that the following Certificate. of Correction to the 1980 tax roll be approved for the Chairman'. siqnaturel 1980 TAX ROLL TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY !!Q! . DATE - 1980-1 S9 &160 8/17 and 8/19/81 LA~E TRAFFORD MEMORIAL OAR DENS CEMETERY DEEDS NO. 280 and 281 - ACCEPTED FOR RECORDATION Pursuant to action of the Board January 10, 1978, wherein the Chair~an was authorized to sign various deed. to Lake Tarfford Memorial Cardens Cemetery lots a. the need arises, the following Deeds No. 280 and 28l were accepted for recordation. J :F t i . 'a9· {l( ',it! ,j 1 , , _.----,----------.""'!"'--- --....-..,,",'""'".. "·_'·""'''_~'________'_''_",""""",~_""",,·.'',"''''"F.·'~'~.·''''".." ......,"':J' I ·: ~ .," August 25, 1991 .. \ DIVISION OF FORESTRY CONTROLLED BURNING SCHEDULE - APPROVED AS PRESENTED Following an explanation from Aðmlnistrative Aide Crace spaulding that amóñg the' Miscellaneous correspoñdencè'of August ll, 1981 there wa. a notice from the Division of Forestry which outlined their controlled burning schedule for the upcoming year, and that she has since learned that this schedule must be approved by the Board, Commissioner Wimer so moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and carried 4/0, with Commissioner Brown absent. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE - FILED ^ND/OR REFERRED There being no objection, the Chair directed the following correspondence be filed and/or referred to the various departments as ind Icated I 1. Letter dated 8/4/81 from Catherine and James Lawhun re the placement of the Cocohatchee Canal weir structure. FUed . 2. Letter datod 8/15/61 from Supervisor of Budgets Frank Smith, Department of Revenue, to Sam Colding advising that the Property ~ppraiser's Budget as approved by his division on 7/15/81 is the final approved budget. xc H.L. Hall. Filed. 3. Letter dated 8/12/81 from Director Charles R. Russell, Dept. of Labor and Employment Security, to CBTA Director Don Norton ro CET~ Title IV YETP Contract for FY 1982. Fll ed . 4. Letter dated 8/12/81 from Director Charle. R. Rus.ell, Dept. of Labor and Employment Security, to CETA Director Don Norton re CET~ Title II-B Contract for FY 1982. Filed. s. Copy of DER Notice on File No. ll-4602S-SB, Tage Bertelsen, stating the Depart~.nt is processing the .eawal1 application. Filed. 6. Letter dated 8/17/81 from Oordon Romels, Envlronmentwl Specialist, DER, in reference to the Immokalee Stockade and .ewage treatment plant probl.... xc Sheriff Roger., Irving Berzon, Lowell Raines. riled. ~ Cl63..~ Pag. '4 ~-~----~-~-----~-~~-~~~-~~-~-~~~~~ . , .. " ..~ ,-,.~.~,:.Jt ,:', ' ,<¡i . :,.,!/:~ :,;j~~!~;'~',;.::;> :,~ . . . ,'" ~':.~"):''''~ --M w_....._____......,4;¡"..I~....__Ø__*..........· , ;.;Û~£~:~,', 8COX OB3 PAtE 304 Auqust 25, 1981 ,:::' 7. Letter datèd 8/14/81 from Governor Graham re appointment of Homer Betancourt to the Immokalee Water and Sewer District, plus copy of letter dated 8/10/81 to Mr. Bet~ncourt from the Governor. Filed. 8. Letter dated 8/10/81 from Suaan L. Cooper re problem with termination of water service and return of deposit. xc Mr. Berzon. Filed. , , 9. Copy of Ochopee Fire Control District Advisory Board meeting minutes dated 8/11/81. Piled. 10. Copy of Naples City Council minutes of 8/5/81 meeting. FUed. 11. í , 12. 13. 14. , ~' ft, ~... t .... J , ,4 . -"'~ :r \ , ,: ~~µ;"~ t '-.;, .~ ~'~:';,':O::<M""4';':',' , J""]"'~~'" , :'~..', ,w"............. ij ,"",;)~ .::¡. , ': " : ' '\ Letter dated 8/16/81 from Ken Umpenhour regarding a problem with service by EMS. xc Mr. Norman, Mr. Hafner, Mr. Oreenfield. Filed. 'I, Letter ~ated 8/18/81 from R. J. Vann, President, Tri-County Plumbing- Heating- Cooling Contractors Asan. re the improvements in the Inspections made by the Building Department. Filed. Certificates of Need Requests, Review Schedule from South Central Florida Health Systems Council, Inc. received 8/21/81. Fileð. Letter dated 8/19/81 from Everett H. Rothschild, HUD, re Paralyzed Veterans of America, et el, plaintiffs, va. William French Smith. xc Ms. Yates, ~r. Norman. Filed. 15. Letter dated 8/14/81 from Michael C. Garretson, Direct?r, Dept. of Veteran and Community Affairs, re 9rants to Local Oovernment to a.slst in meetinq the requirements of the Local Oovernment Comprehensive Planning Act. xc Mr. Virta, Mr. Nor.an. Filed. Letter dated 8/21/81 from Dean Zaneis expre.sing a desire to operate two portable bait boats on Marco I.land. xc "r. Norman, "r. Rice. riled. Letter dated 8/21/81 from Gordon Caldi. expres.lft9 his desire to see the budget reduced. xc Mr. Norman, Mr. tlall . F11 ed . " . '~,~ , ;:"'" )i ,9Jí; ,,~ ' \;)6 ,':'4f;i ,:!¡X: ,>"W' . /!: ;/:¡~, , ',) ",; 16. " "',"'1 ". 17. '. .~.., . Page '5 ,',/' :¡~,~,~, ~,,: ',' . 11 """,...",.,;,.<"-""''''''''..-_''''''''_....._.."........,;,--...''',,,..'''',,."'~"..,.." . huguat 25, 19P.l .. 18. Brochure entitlod, "Direction for tho Eighties", a ,forost resource program planning document. Filed. Lettor dated 8/3/81 from Forester Chris ^nderson re monthly roport. Filed. , Public Service Commission Docket No. eOOSS1-PU, Order No. 10219, Issued 8/l8/81 rQ ^doption of ~endments to ' Rule 2S-4.ll0(3), Customer Billing. Filed. ~";'; 19. .': 20. " ." .rÞ,·.. '. ," \ f' ~...¡_\ ' . . ..:,........' . , , ,:,.., .:! . " ;.' - ~ : * * * There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair - Times 4s18 P.M. .... ~- I.. -:: ", ' : í, '/'.', ",......' ,) "t: I'A .,," .' V,f. '",' - :> ',.'~A Sn)\\~~") ....,"".. ...... :. } . '.' BO~RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/EX OFFICIO COVERNING BOARDS(S) OF SPECI^L DX~TR~CTS U(}R£t? ~ p, C: CLER~ . ~ 063/1AŒ'SD5 , . . .."".,ü~_,~",""__~""",,.,'___"_'I>'~___''';':'''''''_·''.' .