CCPC Minutes 09/07/2004 W
TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
UDC - LDC WORKSHOP
Naples, Florida, September 7, 2004
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning
Commission in and for the County of Collier, having conducted
business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in the BCC Chambers,
Main Government Complex, Building F, Naples, Florida, with the
following members present:
Chairman: Russell Budd
Vice-Chairman: Mark Strain
Kenneth Abernathy
Brad Schiffer
Robert Murray
ALSO PRESENT:
Patrick White, Assistant County Attorney
Russell Webb, Principal Planner
1
eotr County
UOC Industry/Public Training Sessions Agenda
Thursday. August 26th (3:00 - 5:00) and Friday. August 27th 00:00 - 12:00)
1. General Introduction - Brief overview ofthe change. why it took place and how this
will affect staffs review.
2. PowerPoint Presentation - Gail Easley (our consultant for the rewrite) presentation.
The Power Point will consist of the following:
a. Overview - general Introduction to the recodified LOC.
b. Purpose - explanation of the need for the rewrite.
c. Background - history of the LOC.
d. Format and Structure - general layout of the LOC.
e. General introduction to each Chapter.
f. Benefits of the recodified LOC structure vs. the old LOC.
g. Adoption date.
3. Errors/omissions in the recodification and the vehicle to handle them.
4. Appendix "H" - an extremely useful tool.
5. Question and Answer - Staffs comments/concerns/questions.
1) Introduction - Patrick White, ACA
- Adoption date and municipal code. Barry Axelrod (digital versions of LDC)
2) Agenda Overview
- Informal, not taped
3) Why change took place. Review will be more efficient
4) Purpose of recodification
5) Commissioner Schiffer asked where provisions were relocated.
- Explained that they were relocated to Code of Laws and eventually an
Administrative Code
6) Commissioner Murray asked if Appendix "H" was in electronic version.
- Yes.
7) Commissioner Strain asked about how we are going to deal with sections that
are numerous pages so you know where you are in the document.
- Patrick explained that the published version would have ears.
8) Format & Structure
- Development cycle timeline
9) Chapter breakdown
- Applying vs. interpreting regulations
10) Commissioner Schiffer asked about "County Manager or his designee"
statement and whether the public would know who is the appropriate person.
- Patrick explained that a more detailed description would be provided in Code
of Laws.
11) Chapter 2 - Zoning Districts
12) Chapter 3 - Resource Protection
13) Chapter 4 - Dimensional Standards
14) Chapter 5 - Supplemental Standards
15) Chapter 6 - Infrastructure Improvement
16) Chapter 8 - Decision-Making Bodies
17) Chapter 9 - Variances, Nonconformities
18) Chapter 10 - Administrative & Decision-Making Procedures
2
- -..,-".--.--..--..-".
19) Benefits of UDC structure
20) Commissioner Strain asked about provisions in Code of Laws and how we
amend them (the process).
- Patrick said CCPC would not be involved in Code of Laws Amendment
process, but could be.
21) Commissioner Abernathy asked for examples of provisions that were moved to
Code of Laws.
- One example was Division 3.6 (well construction).
22) Commissioner Strain asked about cycle 2 Amendments and how they would be
implemented into LDC/UDC.
- Patrick mentioned parallel cites, but that the amendments would be to UDC.
23) Commissioner Strain asked about electronic versions of supplements to UDC.
- Informed that they would see them
24) Commissioner Strain and Commissioner Murray asked for a hard copy of
presentation.
25) Ordinance (04-41)
- Section Five (conflict and severability). Patrick explained the process of
dealing with errors/omissions in the recodification. Talked about PUD's, 2nd
cycle of amendments and process for unintended consequences.
26) Commissioner Schiffer asked whether there are any intended consequences of
the recodification.
- Patrick says a non-substantial change was all that was intended.
27) Commissioner Murray asked about errors/omissions in Administrative
Code/Code of Laws provisions, as CCPC would no longer hear Code of Laws
provIsIons.
- Patrick says CCPC would still hear these.
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was
adjourned.
Collier County Planning Commission
Russell Budd, Chairman
3