Agenda 06/26/2018 Item #16D1206/26/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve an after-the-fact grant request to the Florida Department of State,
Division of Historic Resources for funding in the amount of $100,000 for architectural drawings,
site development, and landscape plan of the Margood Harbor Park Historic Cottage site and the
Resolution to authorize the submission of the grant application and designating currently budgeted
funds for the required match.
OBJECTIVE: To prepare architectural drawings and landscape plans for the Margood Harbor Park
Historic Cottage site in accordance with Florida Communities Trust (FCT) grant requirements for historic
restoration of the remaining cottages.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of State, Division of Historic Resources, Small Matching
Grant programs provides funding to assist local, regional, and state-wide efforts to preserve significant
historical and archaeological resources, and to promote the knowledge and appreciation of the history of
Florida. A grant alert and request for eligible projects were received by Collier County on March 28,
2018.
The plan recommends exterior restoration and stabilization of cottages 6 and 7; dismantle and reconstruct
cottage #5 (interior and exterior restoration); condemn and demolish cottage and gara ge #8; refurbish
cistern; construct an open air 1920 gazebo; historic landscaping; ADA access to all structures; new
fencing, and interpretive signage throughout the site.
The grant applications preparation occurred during May leaving insufficient time for Board action to meet
the grant submission deadline of June 1, 2018. Collier County CMA #5330 authorizes the County
Manager to approve the submittal of grant applications with subsequent Board of County Commissioners
action at the next available Board meeting to ratify the approval as “after-the-fact.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the project is $100,000 with a funding request from the Florida
Department of State of $50,000. The program requires a 100% local match or $50,000 and that local
match funds are available at the time of application. As such, $15,000 of matching funds are available for
immediate use within Parks Capital Project Fund (306), Margood Cottage Restoration Project 80322 and
$35,000 in the Regional Park Assessment Project 80370. It is anticipated funding will be restored to
Regional Park Assessment in the approval of the FY19 budget request.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to
this action.
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION: The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board approved
the project at their April 18, 2018 Meeting.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The Board of County Commissioners (Board) will have the opportunity
to accept or reject the funds if the grant is approved. Accordingly, this office has no issue concerning the
legality of this request, which is appropriate for Board action and requires a majority vote for Board
action. -JAB
RECOMMENDATION: To approve an after-the-fact grant request to the Florida Department of State,
Division of Historic Resources for funding in the amount of $100,000 for architectural drawings, site
development, and landscape plan of the Margood Harbor Park Historic Cottage site and the Resolution to
authorize the submission of the grant application and designating currently budgeted funds for the
06/26/2018
required match.
Prepared By: Nancy Olson, Regional Manager, Parks and Recreation Division
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. [Linked] APPLICATION Margood Small Matching - CMO approved (PDF)
2. CM Memo 2018 05-31 Smalll Matching Grant (PDF)
3. Resolution (PDF)
06/26/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 16.D.12
Doc ID: 5881
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve an after-the-fact grant request to the Florida
Department of State, Division of Historic Resources for funding in the amount of $100,000 for
architectural drawings, site development, and landscape plan of the Margood Harbor Park Historic
Cottage site and the Resolution to authorize the submission of the grant application and designating
currently budgeted funds for the required match.
Meeting Date: 06/26/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Operations Analyst – Parks & Recreation
Name: Matthew Catoe
06/05/2018 12:13 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Division Director - Parks & Recreation – Parks & Recreation
Name: Barry Williams
06/05/2018 12:13 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Parks & Recreation Barry Williams Additional Reviewer Completed 06/07/2018 1:53 PM
Operations & Veteran Services Sean Callahan Additional Reviewer Completed 06/11/2018 9:01 AM
Public Services Department Joshua Hammond Level 1 Division Reviewer Completed 06/11/2018 2:11 PM
Public Services Department Steve Carnell Level 2 Division Administrator Review Completed 06/11/2018 3:10 PM
County Attorney's Office Jennifer Belpedio Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 06/11/2018 4:13 PM
Grants Erica Robinson Level 2 Grants Review Completed 06/13/2018 1:06 PM
County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 06/13/2018 1:20 PM
Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 06/14/2018 9:03 AM
Office of Management and Budget Susan Usher Additional Reviewer Completed 06/15/2018 12:55 PM
Grants Therese Stanley Additional Reviewer Completed 06/18/2018 8:21 AM
County Manager's Office Leo E. Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 06/18/2018 9:17 AM
Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 06/26/2018 9:00 AM
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 1/15
Collier County Board of County Commissioners
Project Title:
1.
2.
3.
A. Organization Information Page 1 of 9
Applicant Information
a. Organization Name: Collier County Board of County Commissioners (/Organization/Details/1002)
b. FEID: 59-6000558
c. Phone number: 239.232.8999
d. Principal Address: 3299 Tamiami Trl E Ste 403 Naples, 34112
e. Mailing Address: 3331 Tamiami Trail E Naples, 34112
f. Website: www.colliercountyfl.gov
g. Organization Type: County Government
h. Organization Category: Government: Other
i. County: Collier
j. DUNS number: 076997790
Designated Project Contact *
Authorized Official *
Certified Local Governments (CLG) *
Yes
No
If yes, is this an application for federal or state funding?
Federal (Survey, Planning, and National Register Nomination project types only)
State (Education and Publication, and Historical Marker project types only)
First Name
Carrie
Last Name
Drew
Phone
239.252.4000
Email
carrie.drew@colliercountyfl.gov (mailto:carrie.drew@colliercountyfl.gov)
First Name
Leo
Last Name
Ochs, Jr.
Phone
239.252.2383
Email
leoochs@colliercountyfl.gov (mailto:leoochs@colliercountyfl.gov)
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 2/15
4.
5.
6.
7.
If yes, provide the following:
19
Florida Main Street Programs *
Yes
No
Applicant Grant Experience and History
Has the applicant received previous grant assistance within the past five years from any source? *
Yes
No
If yes, for each grant specify the year of the grant award, grant number, grant project name, the granting
entity, the grant award amount, and its current status. Make sure to include any grants awarded by the
Division or other State grants.
#Previous
Grant Year
Previous
Grant
Number.
Previous Grant Project Name Previous Granting Entity Previous
Grant
Amount
Open/Closed Subtotal
Proposed Project Team *
#Name Project Role Title Percentage of Time Email
1 Nancy Olsen Project Manager 7
2 Barry Williams Project Supervisor 2
Applicant staffing and hours *
Organization is open at least 40 hours per week and has at least one paid staff member in a management position
Organization has some paid staff but they are not full-time
Organization is open part-time and has volunteer staff
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 3/15
1.
2.
3.
B. Project Information Page 2 of 9
Project Type *
Survey Project
Projects which identify, document, and evaluate historic or archaeological resources within historic or archaeological districts or areas
being investigated for the potential of becoming historic districts or zones, or updating previous surveys.
Planning Project
Projects to prepare historic structures report, condition assessment, predictive modeling, preparation of preservation or management
plans, design or preservation guidelines and such, necessary to guide the long term preservation of a historic resource or historic district.
National Register Nominations Project
Projects that prepare a nomination to the National Register of Historic Places, be it individual or thematic nominations.
Education and Publication Project
Projects aimed at increasing public understanding and awareness of the importance of historical and archaeological resources and their
preservation, either in general or in particular for specific sites, properties, or collections.
Main Street Start-up or Re-start-up Project
A one-time start-up grant to newly designated Florida Main Street communities pursuant to Chapter 1A-36, Florida Administrative Code
(https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ChapterHome.asp?Chapter=1A-36), or a one-time restart grant for Main Streets that have been inactive
for more than ten years and have new board members to return to active program status.
Historical Marker Project
Projects which assist with the acquisition of state markers for which texts (monolingual or bilingual) have been approved by the State
Historical Marker Council prior to applying for the grant.
Project Title and Location Information
The title should reflect the name of the property, site, area, and the goals of the proposed project. The title should be consistent with previous
applications/awards. (For example, Pensacola Maritime Heritage Trail, Archaeological Survey of Deering Estate, etc.)
Project Title *
Margood Cottages Restoration
Name of Property (If applicable)
Margood Cottages
Street Address (primary location where the proposed project will be carried out)
Petit Dr.
City (location of the proposed project)
Goodland
Primary County (location of the proposed project)
Collier
Additional Counties Served
Select any additional counties the project will serve.
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 4/15
1.
2.
C. Historical Significance Page 3 of 9
Historical Designation
Indicate the type of historical designation currently held by the historic resource. For properties or sites that have been listed in the National
Register or are contributing properties or sites within a National Register District, provide the date that the property, site or district was listed.
Should you have questions regarding the National Register status of a property or site, contact the Division's National Register Staff at
1.800.847.7278 or 850.245.6300.
Type of Historical Designation *
Individual Local Designation
Historical Designation details
#Property Name Date Designated
1 Mar-Good Harbor Park 1/13/2015
Historical Significance
Explain the historic significance for the property, site, information, or resource(s) that is the subject of the
proposed project - (Maximum characters 1500.)
The project site contains numerous significant historic resources that are exemplary representations of an early 20 century Florida
“Fish Camp” architecture. The site is located in the community of Goodland on Marco Island, which is part of the Ten Thousand Islands
and Everglades National Park. The community was first settled in 1887 where farming occurred, and the large shell mounds created by
the Calusa were sold as road materials. In 1949 Goodland experienced its largest period of growth when the Barron Collier Company
moved 20 homes from Caxambas to Goodland. Three years later the Margood Cottages and Trailer Park was developed. The site
contained cottages, a cistern, event space, office and even a movie theater. Over the next decade several other cottages were relocated
to the site.
The property operated as a fish camp, trailer park and seasonal vacation destination until 2005 when the County purchased the land to
preserve the site and develop a waterfront park.
The proposed project will restore several of the cottages that are listed on the Florida Master Site File and are considered potentially
eligible for the NRHP under Criterion A “a property associated with events that to the broad patterns of our history”
For projects associated with Historic Structures and Archaeological Sites, enter the Florida Master Site File
(FMSF) Number (ex. 8ES1234). For multiple site forms, separate with a semicolon (;). If no FMSF form
exists, applicants may be required to complete one as part of the requirements in a grant award agreement.
8CR952; 8CR953; 8CR964; 8CR955; 8CR947;
For Historic Property, Indicate Year of the Original Construction (enter Year only)
1950
For Archaeological Sites, provide the Cultural Affiliation of the Site and Dates of Use or Occupation -
(Maximum characters 300.)
th
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 5/15
1.
2.
3.
4.
D. Project Specifics Page 4 of 9
Scope of Work - (Maximum characters 5000.) *
In the space provided below, briefly describe the scope of work for the project for which funding is requested. List the work items that will be
completed during the grant period using the funds requested and the required match.
The project will take place at a 2.5 acre site located on eastern edge of Marco Island within the community of Goodland. The site is
owned by Collier County and managed by the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department. Purchased in 2005 with assistance
from the Trust for Public Land and Florida Communities Trust, the site consists of historic structures and a public park.
The proposed project will develop architectural drawings, site development plan, and landscaping plans for the following components:
Exterior restoration and stabilization of cottages #6 and #7.
Dismantle and reconstruct cottage #5 – interior and exterior restoration.
Condemn and demolish cottage #8
Refurbish exterior of cistern adjacent to cottage #8
Construct an open-air gazebo with 1920s architectural treatment to serve as an outdoor classroom or meeting space.
Historic landscaping
ADA access to structures.
New fencing.
Interpretive signs through-out.
The County will engage a qualified design consultant to complete the work. The consultant will be selected because of past experience
for successfully completing similar projects, knowledge of the region and cost effectiveness. The estimated cost for completion of the
project as identified is $100,000. The County will provide 100% cash match.
Tentative Project Timeline (remember this is a 12 month grant period) *
#Work Item Starting Date Ending Date
1 Select Design Consultant 8/1/2019 9/30/2019
2 Complete final design 10/1/2019 3/30/2020
Planning Projects
Explain the need for the proposed project. - (Maximum characters 1000.)
In 2005 the County received a grant from Florida Communities Trust (FCT) to assist with the acquisition of the project site. At the time of
acquisition, restoration of the historic structures was planned to occur within a short period of time. However, economic conditions
changed and the ability of the County to move forward with the project was delayed. This period of inactivity lasted several years. In
2017 the regions economy had recovered and funds to move forward with the first step in the preservation process became available.
While not enough to complete the design and construction the County was able to complete a restoration plan. This plan identified that
threats to the resources and need to move forward with final design and restoration. Financial assistance from the Division of Historical
Resources will allow the County to complete the final design and provide the County Commission with detailed plans and costs to
appropriate funding for restoration.
How will the product(s) be made available to others in the community? - (Maximum characters 500.)
The County will involve the public and stakeholders in the design process with at least one public meeting to receive comment on the
plans. In addition, the planning documents will be made available on the County’s website and in hard copies upon request. Once
complete the plans will be presented to the County Board of Commissioners for review and approval. The Board’s approval will occur at
a regularly scheduled public meeting. The plans will be available to the public as part of the agenda package.
Does the proposed project entail a partnership with any other local entity?
Yes
No
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 6/15
If yes, describe their participation to date and anticipated further participation in this project.
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 7/15
1.
2.
3.
4.
E. Budget and Match Page 5 of 9
Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI) Waiver of Match Requirements *
Yes
No
Are you a state agency, state college, or state university?
Yes
No
Project Budget and Match
Grant Funds and Match *
#Work Item
Entity Providing
Service
Grant
Funds
Cash
Match
In-Kind
Match Total
1 Final Design Documents $50,000 $50,000 $0 $100,000
Totals:$50,000 $50,000 $0 $100,000
Grant Funds Requested:
$50,000
Total Match Amount:
$50,000
Project Total Budget:
$100,000
Additional Budget Information/Clarification
Use this space to provide additional detail or information about the proposal budget as needed. For example, where the relationship between
items in the budget and the objectives of the proposed project may not be obvious, provide clarification regarding the necessity for or
contribution of those work items to the successful completion of the project.
The County will engage a qualified design consultant to complete architectural drawings, site development plan, and a landscaping plan.
The County will select and contract with the consultant using its established procurement guidelines.
Completed Project Activities
#Activity Description Date Completed Cost Value
1 Margood Cottages Restoration Plan 4/27/2017 $20,000
Operating Forecast. - (Maximum characters 500.)
Describe source(s) of funding for necessary maintenance, program support, and/or additional expenses warranted to sustain the proposed
project after the grant period.
The proposed project is a planning project. Once complete the project will not require any additional maintenance or operations funding.
The County will use the plans to complete the restoration work. This project will be carried out by the County using a combination of
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 8/15
grant and local funding.
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 9/15
1.
2.
F. Property Information Page 6 of 9
Property Ownership (for site-specific projects).
Enter name of the Property Owner and choose the appropriate owner type. If applicant is not the owner of the property, the applicant must
secure Property Owner concurrence. The applicant shall provide a letter from the Property Owner that documents that the applicant has the
permission of the Property Owner of record to conduct the proposed project on the owner’s property and that the Property Owner is in
concurrence with this application for grant funding. This letter shall be uploaded in the Support Materials section of this application.
Does your organization own the property? *
Yes
No
Property Owner
Collier County
Type of Ownership
Non-Profit Organization
Private Individual or For-Profit Entity
Note: Properties owned by private individuals or for-profit entities are not eligible for grant funding with the exception of site-specific
archaeological projects that entail fieldwork being undertaken by an eligible applicant organization.
Governmental Agency
Threats or Endangerment - (Maximum characters 1500.)
Discuss the immediate endangerment to the historic resource(s) that is the subject of the proposed project, including existing or potential
short-term threats of loss or damage to the properties, site, or information, as consequence of issues such as inaction, deterioration or lack of
understanding of its historical significance. Documentation material, such as newspaper articles, are to be uploaded in the Support Materials
section of this application.
The County with assistance from a qualified consultant completed an assessment and restoration plan in 2017. The report included on-
site inspections of the structures by the architect and structural engineers. Overall the assessment found the cottages to be deteriorating
and in need of significant restoration efforts. Without action the historic site might be lost forever. The structures have compromised
foundations, rim joists, floor framing and sheathing as well as water intrusion and termite infestations. Exterior wall siding and sheathing
are in poor condition and while the roof framing is sound the metal roofs are near the end of their useful lives. Documentation of these
conditions identified in the report is provided as an attachment.
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 10/15
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
G. Protection and Impact Page 7 of 9
Local Protection
Indicate the level(s) of local protection currently afforded the project historic property or site and upload a copy of the local protection
documents in the Support Materials section of this application.
Local Protection Level(s) *
Local Ordinance Design Review
Preservation or Conservation Easement
Protective/Restrictive Covenant
Annual Visitation
What is the estimated or anticipated Annual Visitation for the project property or site?
15,000
What is the basis of these estimates? - (Maximum characters 200.)
The estimated visitor figures are based on a combination of daily visits with attendance at special events.
Anticipated Economic Impact - (Maximum characters 1500.) *
Explain the direct economic impact this project will have on the surrounding community. Include any information regarding number of jobs it
will provide, if known.
Through planning and effective restoration, the project site will become a unique historic and eco-tourism destination for visitors to the
region. While Goodland is a small rural island with only 400 residents, the community draws thousands of visitors on the weekends and
during special events. During these times local restaurants host musicians, artist’s come to be inspired by the landscape and visitors
soak up the ambience away from the County’s urban areas. In addition, special events such as the Mullet Festival bring large crowds to
the island.
The project will be incorporated into this unique atmosphere and impact tourism. Planning of the site will take this into account. The final
design for the structures and interpretive facilities will be completed to attract visitors of all ages. By creating an informative and
enjoyable facility the project can increase the number of visitors to the island benefitting the local businesses and generating economic
growth.
Benefit to Minorities and the Disabled - (Maximum characters 1500.) *
Describe any direct benefit the project will have on minority groups and/or the disabled. If project includes media content, describe
accessibility methods to be used (e.g. voice over, closed captioning, etc.)
The project will benefit the minority population of the County by increasing awareness of the area’s Native American habitation on the
island. Before development of the community, the large shell mounds existed. While these mounds were removed by the early settlers in
the 1870’s the County will include interpretive information on the first inhabitants of the island and the mounds that predate settlement.
The project will be designed to increase access to disabled visitors. Currently the area of the site where the historic structures are
located is not accessible by the disabled. The restoration plans will include making the site ADA compliant. Once the project is complete,
minority groups and the disabled will have greater access to the many opportunities this site provides.
Educational Benefits and Public Awareness - (Maximum characters 1500.) *
Explain how the proposed project will educate the public on issues related to historic preservation, Florida history, and/or heritage
preservation.
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 11/15
The completion of the final design will lead to the site being transformed into a historical destination that enhances awareness of
preservation and education. The proposed project will develop effective plans for the County to further these efforts. The plans will
include restoration specifications for the existing resources as well as development of educational facilities such as interpretive signage
and exhibits. Visitors will be able to experience many of the cottages as they were originally constructed and along with new interpretive
signage increase their knowledge of the rich history of the community.
Another component of the project is the design and construction of an open-air gazebo with 1920s architectural treatment to serve as an
outdoor classroom or meeting space. This facility will allow historical educational programs to be conducted at the site. The County
anticipates coordinating with local historical and education organizations to develop programming. This programming will occur
throughout the year on a regular basis for participants from schools and community groups and during special events to take advantage
of the larger crowds of visitors. The facility will be the key component in directly enhancing the awareness of areas history and the
benefits of historic preservation.
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 12/15
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
H. Support Materials Page 8 of 9
Non-Profit Status
Substitute W-9 Form
Documentation of Confirmed Match
File Name File
Size
View (opens in new window)
CIP Budget
Approp-
Margood
Cottages.pdf
59
[KB]
View file (https://grantsblob.blob.core.windows.net/2020/Projects/4730/Application/Files/CIP Budget Approp-
Margood Cottages.pdf?sv=2016-05-
31&sr=b&si=applicationFileAccessPolicy&sig=HjRgUUJVUKt5j5kVpXs%2BdvQUwDJqSyD0Wn26xh2ccV8%3D)
Letters of Support
Photographs
File Name File
Size
View (opens in new window)
Margood
Cottages
Photographs.pdf
668
[KB]
View file (https://grantsblob.blob.core.windows.net/2020/Projects/4730/Application/Files/Margood Cottages
Photographs.pdf?sv=2016-05-
31&sr=b&si=applicationFileAccessPolicy&sig=R7xlwDxic21dMt11WHkayof9MBaH89jEcPw0AgqBEgs%3D)
Representative Image
File Name File
Size
View (opens in new window)
Representative
Image -
Margood
Cottages.jpg
111
[KB]
View file (https://grantsblob.blob.core.windows.net/2020/Projects/4730/Application/Files/Representative Image -
Margood Cottages.jpg?sv=2016-05-
31&sr=b&si=applicationFileAccessPolicy&sig=JP5aigqc3%2FaX9%2BROrDBu%2B4y2GFRf02UIJ1cLarJpnws%3D)
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 13/15
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Florida Historical Marker Council Support Documents (for Historical Marker Projects only)
Documentation of Threat or Endangerment
File Name File
Size
View (opens in new window)
Attachment B
Margood
Cottages
Restoration Plan
2017-07-28
REV_ (1).pdf
7806
[KB]
View file (https://grantsblob.blob.core.windows.net/2020/Projects/4730/Application/Files/Attachment B Margood
Cottages Restoration Plan 2017-07-28 REV_ (1).pdf?sv=2016-05-
31&sr=b&si=applicationFileAccessPolicy&sig=sqErcHRBazHHnaVi3Z4HGd%2BDFuq7y5q9E4gDftLYdL8%3D)
Local Protection
File Name File
Size
View (opens in new window)
Reso 15-15
Historic
Designation.pdf
416
[KB]
View file (https://grantsblob.blob.core.windows.net/2020/Projects/4730/Application/Files/Reso 15-15 Historic
Designation.pdf?sv=2016-05-
31&sr=b&si=applicationFileAccessPolicy&sig=zFpp1Bo75LuxTzJPdDNL%2BiYEVPFukGLOJ8Es3jA9KkI%3D)
Owner Concurrence Letter (for site-specific projects only)
Optional Materials
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 14/15
1.
I. Review and Submit Page 9 of 9
Review and Submit
I hereby certify that I am authorized to submit this application on behalf of Collier County Board of County Commissioners and that all
information indicated is true and accurate. I acknowledge that my electronic signature below shall have the same legal effect as my
written signature. I am aware that making a false statement or representation to the Department of State constitutes a third degree felony
as provided for in s. 817.155, F.S., punishable as provided for by ss. 775.082, 775.083, and 775.084.
Guidelines Certification
I hereby certify that I have read and understand the guidelines and all application requirements for this grant program as outlined under
section , Florida Statutes 1A-39.001 and 1A-39.001, Florida Administrative Code.
Signature (Enter first and last name)
5/23/2018 https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730
https://dosgrants.com/GrantApplication/PrintPreview?gid=4730 15/15
Collier County Government
Fiscal Year 2018 Adopted Budget - Capital Improvement Program
Capital Improvement Program
Parks & Recreation Capital Projects (306)
CIP Category / Project Title Adopted ForecastedAmended BudgetBudgetBudgetBudgetBudget
FY 2017 FY 2017FY 2017 FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018
Parks & Recreation
AOlesky Pier Repair - - - - - 52,800 52,848 -
AOlesky Sea Wall Repair - - - - - 104,300 104,332 -
Bayview Pk Expansion - - - - - 7,100 7,158 -
Caxambas Coast Guard Bldg Replac - - - - - 282,500 282,500 200,000
Coast Guard Bldg - - - - - 6,400 6,363 -
Com Pk - Fiber Optics - - - - - 137,500 137,568 125,000
Com Pk - IWF Repair - - - - - 26,400 26,367 45,000
Com Pk - Security Cameras - - - - - 35,500 35,479 -
ComPk - Assessments - - - - 200,000 - - -
ComPk - Athletic Field/Court
Maintenance
- - - - 135,000 - - -
ComPk - Fitness Equipment - - - - 250,000 - - -
ComPk - Lighting Infrastructure Maint - - - - 75,000 - - -
ComPk - Other Repairs/Maintenance - - - - 50,000 - - -
ComPk - Pathway/Road Repairs - - - - 100,000 66,000 66,000 -
ComPk - Playground/Shade Structure
Maint
- - - - 50,000 145,000 145,000 145,000
ComPk - Pool Repairs - - - - 390,000 - - -
Corkscrew School Courts - - - - - 100 116 -
Cricket Pitch - - - - - 23,000 23,000 -
E Naples - Irrigation - - - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000
E Naples Com Pickleball - - - - - 1,700 1,718 -
E Naples Com Pk Shade Structure - - - - - 30,000 30,000 -
GGCP Pool Repairs - - - - - 36,600 36,585 65,000
Golden Gate Field Lighting - - - - - 650,000 650,000 650,000
Gordon River Greenway Pk - - - - - 8,300 8,300 -
Immok Pool Repairs - - - - - 64,000 64,005 100,000
Immok Sports Complex ADA Kiddie Pool - - - - - 200 159 -
Immok Sports Complex Fitness Renov - - - - - 437,500 437,426 250,000
Light Pole Analysis - - - - - 15,000 15,000 -
Mar-Good Cottage Restoration - - - - - 46,900 46,913 -
NCRP Admissions Equip - - - - - 55,000 55,000 -
NCRP Lazy River & Slide Maint - - - - - 672,100 672,080 750,000
NCRP Outdoor Furniture - - - - - 8,700 8,692 -
NCRP Pond Shade - - - - - - - 15,000
NCRP Pool Pump Repairs - - - - - 86,600 86,622 35,000
RegPk - Assessment - - - - 200,000 - - -
RegPk - Exotic Removal - - - - - 2,400 2,344 -
RegPk - Other Repairs/Maintenance - - - - 254,500 - - -
RegPk - Pathway/Road Repairs - - - - 100,000 17,400 17,425 -
RegPk - Playground/Shade Structure
Maint
- - - - - 119,600 119,589 -
RegPk - Security - - - - 50,000 32,800 32,845 -
RegPk - Sun-N-Fun Pool Repairs - - - - 395,500 91,300 91,295 -
TRosbough Irrigation Well - - - - - 1,300 1,333 -
Vanderbilt Beach Master Meter - - - - - 10,000 10,021 -
Veterans Pk Pickleball Courts - - - - - 114,900 114,938 -
Vineyards Aeration Pump Replacement - - - - - 700 652 -
X-fers/Reserves - Fund 306 - - - - 44,400 2,120,700 3,219,187 2,570,900
- - - - 2,294,400 5,530,300 6,628,860 4,970,900Parks & Recreation
4,970,900 - - - - 2,294,400 5,530,300 6,628,860Program Total Project Budget
Fiscal Year 2018 34 Capital Improvement Program
Margood Cottages - Existing Conditions Photographs
Project Site Aerial and Location Map
Margood Cottages - Existing Conditions Photographs
Project Site Aerial and Location Map
Margood Cottages Restoration Plan
Goodland, Florida
Prepared for
Collier County Parks and Recreation Department
Naples, Florida
July 27, 2017
Victor J Latavish Architect, PA
4100 Corporate Square,
Suite 100
Naples, Florida 34104
Member Of The American Institute Of Architects
Florida Registered Architect 1831, AR11942
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
MARGOOD
COTTAGES
RESTORATION
PLAN
P1
The
Margood
Cottages
P2
Background
Information,
Zoning,
Setbacks
P3
Landscape
Buffers,
Fire
Codes,
Building
Codes,
FEMA
P4
Accessibility
P5
Restrooms,
Asbestos
&
Hazardous
Materials
P6
Building
Condition
Summary
and
Conclusions
P7
Recommendations
APPENDICES
A
Restoration
Plans
A1
Existing
Cottage
Site
Plan
A2
Preliminary
Cottage
Restoration
Site
Plan
A3
Alternate
Preliminary
Cottage
Restoration
Site
Plan
A4
Margood
Harbor
Park
Site
Plan
A5
Cottage
#5
Plan
&
Elevations
A6
Cottage
#6
Plan
&
Elevations
A7
Cottage
#7
Plan
&
Elevations
A8
Cottage
#8
Plan
&
Elevations
B
Preliminary
Construction
Cost
and
Project
Budget
C
Structural
Engineers
Report
THE
MARGOOD
COTTAGES
The
cottages
are
exemplary
representations
of
early
20th
century
Florida
“Fish-‐
Camp”
architecture
used
for
regional
tourist
accommodations.
The
cottages
were
damaged
by
Hurricane
Wilma,
water
intrusion,
and
termites,
and
are
currently
unoccupied.
This
report
includes
evaluations
by
Victor
J.
Latavish,
AIA
Architect
and
Liebl
&
Barrow
Structural
Engineers,
a
brief
summary
of
Rindings
and
conclusions,
recommendations,
and
preliminary
cost
estimates
for
recommended
restoration
work.
1
BACKGROUND
INFORMATION
The
cottages
were
included
in
a
2010
Collier
County
SDP
permit
and
have
previously
been
evaluated
in
a
2004
Historic
Assessment
Reports
which
is
attached
as
appendix
to
this
report.
Cottage
Number
Cross-‐Reference
TableCottage
Number
Cross-‐Reference
TableCottage
Number
Cross-‐Reference
TableCottage
Number
Cross-‐Reference
Table
2017
Report
2010
Collier
County
SDP
2007
Engineer’s
Condition
Survey
2004
Historical
Assessment
5 8.5 5 11
6 8.6 6 10
7 8.7 7 9
8 8.8 8 8
Cistern N/A N/A 12
REGULATORY
AGENCIES
Regulations
regarding
property
zoning,
setbacks,
buffers,
building
and
Rire
codes,
accessibility,
etc.,
were
reviewed
with
the
local
Authorities
Having
Jurisdiction
(AHJ)
and
are
summarized
herein.
ZONING
The
property
is
zoned
Public
Use
District
(P).
Park
use
is
permitted,
allowing
museums,
assembly,
educational,
parks
&
recreation,
and
similar
community
uses.
PROPERTY
SETBACKS
The
required
front
and
rear
setback
is
25’
and
the
required
side
setbacks
are
5’.
None
of
the
existing
cottages
conform
to
required
25’
setbacks.
As
Rishing
cottages
or
unoccupied
structures,
the
buildings
may
remain
in
the
current
locations.
Rebuilding
the
cottages
or
a
change
of
use
will
require
relocating
cottages
to
comply
with
setbacks
and
separation
requirements
in
building
and
Rire
codes.
2
LANDSCAPE
BUFFERS
The
buffers
are
indicated
in
records
as
a
10’
D
buffer
along
the
right
of
way
and
5’
on
the
North
Side
and
rear
of
the
property.
These
are
within
the
setbacks
and
available
space.
FIRE
CODES
The
structures
are
regulated
by
the
Florida
Fire
Prevention
Code
which
include
NFPA
1
and
NFPA
101
(Florida
edition).
Occupied
structures
modiRied
or
rebuilt
must
comply
with
the
referenced
codes
unless
exempted
with
restrictions
as
designated
historic
structures.
Due
to
the
small
size
of
the
structures
and
nature
of
the
project,
compliance
with
Rire
codes
is
not
a
signiRicant
issue.
Basic
life
safety
features
can
be
provided
with
minimal
cost
and
no
signiRicant
degradation
of
historic
character.
These
features
include
a
single
compliant
egress
door,
hardware,
exit
sign,
emergency
lights,
and
a
Rire
extinguisher.
BUILDING
CODES
ModiRications
or
repairs
to
the
structures
are
regulated
by
Florida
Existing
Building
Code.
In
general,
work
classiRied
as
‘repairs’
can
be
accomplished
by
using
same
materials
and
conRigurations
found
in
the
original
building.
In
regards
to
‘repairs’
as
it
applies
to
Cottages
#6
and
#7,
FBC
Existing
speciRically
stipulates
“When
an
historic
building
is
determined
as
dangerous,
no
work
shall
be
required
except
as
necessary
to
correct
identiRied
dangerous
conditions”,
without
forcing
a
complete
upgrade
of
the
building.
Changes
in
Occupancy:
Proposed
changes
in
occupancy
are
regulated
by
Chapter
10.
This
would
apply
if
the
cottage(s)
were
used
for
business
or
assembly
occupancies.
Historic
Buildings:
If
the
building
is
‘designated
or
deemed
eligible
for
designation
as
a
historic
structure
by
a
local,
regional,
or
national
jurisdiction
as
having
architectural
or
cultural
signiRicance’,
FBC
Existing
does
allow
signiRicant
latitude
in
this
regard.
SpeciRic
requirements
are
determined
by
FBC
Existing
Chapter
12,
and
Appendix
B
“Secretary
of
the
Interiors
Standard
for
Rehabilitation
and
Guidelines
for
Rehabilitating
Historic
Buildings”.
FEMA
The
cottages
are
located
in
Flood
Zone
AE
8’
and
are
non-‐conforming.
The
50%
rule
will
preclude
major
restoration
of
the
cottages
at
their
current
elevations
except
in
certain
circumstances:
•Designation
is
obtained
for
either
state
or
national
historic
structures.
•Necessary
repairs
when
the
structure
is
in
imminent
danger
of
collapse
3
Restoration
or
reconstruction
options
include
following:
•Raising
the
cottages
with
the
bottom
of
the
structural
Rloor
framing
is
elev.
9.0’
or
higher
•Installing
Rlood
panels
up
to
elevation
9.0’
•Not
occupying
one
or
more
of
the
cottages.
Cottage
#6
ACCESSIBILITY
The
existing
cottages
do
not
comply
with
the
American
with
Disabilities
Act
(ADA)
or
current
FBC
required
accessibility
features.
Section
202.5
of
the
Florida
Accessibility
Code
does
allow
exceptions
for
QualiRied
Historic
Buildings,
however
the
nature
of
this
project
and
the
ease
of
which
accessibility
can
be
accomplished
should
be
considered
before
applying
for
further
historic
designations.
For
instance,
a
cottage
open
to
occupancy
could
be
made
accessible
with
a
gently
sloped
sidewalk
or
ramp,
landing,
and
a
3’-‐0”
door.
The
door
can
be
located
at
the
side
or
rear
of
the
cottage,
where
it
would
not
detract
from
the
historic
appearance
from
the
street.
The
accessible
entrance
could
also
be
made
the
primary
entrance
if
incorporated
into
an
accessible
route
connecting
multiple
cottages
as
part
of
a
self-‐guided
museum-‐like
experience.
Full
compliance
with
the
ADA
is
also
consistent
with
the
Collier
County
Vertical
Standards
for
building
construction.
4
RESTROOMS
An
accessible
restroom
is
required
if
the
building(s)
are
open
to
the
public.
The
restroom
may
be
in
one
of
the
cottages
or
an
adjacent
facility
within
500
LF
in
accordance
with
FBC
Plumbing
Code
section
403.3.3.
The
accessible
path
to
the
public
restroom
at
the
adjacent
Interpretive
Center
is
460
LF,
and
may
be
used
in
lieu
of
a
new
accessible
restroom
in
the
Cottage.
In
addition
to
the
accessible
restroom,
with
certain
restrictions,
a
non-‐accessible
single-‐
user
restroom
is
permitted
by
the
Florida
Accessibility
Code
in
the
Cottage
ofRice
if
it
is
‘not
for
common
use
or
public
use’.
Cottage
#8
Asbestos
Siding
HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS
Although
it
was
beyond
the
scope
of
this
report
to
Rind
and
identify
hazardous
materials,
the
following
conditions
are
readily
evident;
•Asbestos
siding
was
used
as
exterior
cladding
all
of
cottage
#8
and
its
garage.
The
siding
is
damaged.
•Vinyl
asbestos
Rloor
tile
(VAT)
is
present
in
most
of
the
cottages,
primarily
in
the
Kitchen
areas.
•Due
to
the
age
of
the
structures,
additional
hazardous
materials
including
lead
paint,
mold,
and
asbestos
are
likely.
•Non-‐functional
HVAC
equipment
needs
to
be
removed
in
compliance
with
EPA
regulations.
5
BUILDING
CONDITION
REPORT
Onsite
inspections
were
conducted
by
Liebl
&
Barrow
Structural
Engineers.
A
copy
of
their
report
is
attached
as
Appendix
C.
The
cottages
are
unoccupied
and
many
door
and
window
openings
are
covered
with
plywood
sheathing.
In
general,
previous
issues
with
insect
infestations
and
most
cases
of
water
intrusion
have
been
solved,
however
none
of
cottages
are
structurally
sound.
The
cottages
foundations,
rim
joists,
Rloor
framing,
and
Rloor
sheathing
are
compromised
and
in
many
cases
damaged
beyond
repair
by
previous
water
intrusion
and
termite
infestations.
Exterior
wall
siding
and
sheathing
are
similarly
damaged
in
many
locations.
Roof
framing
is
generally
sound
but
the
metal
roofs
appear
to
be
near
the
end
of
useful
service.
The
condition
of
the
interiors
is
very
poor.
CONCLUSIONS
Historic
restoration
or
repair
of
all
of
the
cottages
in
their
current
condition
is
not
feasible.
A
combination
of
selective
demolition,
salvaging
appropriate
materials,
reconstruction
of
one
cottage
conforming
to
current
codes,
and
partial
restoration
of
one
or
more
of
the
other
unoccupied
cottages
will
most
likely
provide
most
cost
effective
plan
to
retain
the
historic
character
of
the
Rishing
camp.
6
RECOMMENDATIONS
The
recommended
plan
is
to
dismantle
and
reconstruct
Cottage
#5
using
a
combination
of
salvaged
and
new
materials
to
replicate
the
character
of
the
original
cottage
in
conformance
with
current
codes
so
it
may
be
open
to
the
public.
The
exterior
of
Cottages
#6
and
#7
could
be
refurbished
and
remain
part
of
the
historic
Fish
Camp.
Cottage
#8
is
damaged
beyond
repair,
has
large
quantities
of
asbestos,
and
should
be
demolished.
A
more
detailed
description
of
the
proposed
plan
follows:
Cottage
#5
is
in
the
least
damaged
condition
and
can
be
reconstructed.
With
this
approach,
the
Cottage
could
be
used
to
display
historic
artifacts,
or
as
a
Park
OfRice,
Artists
Studio,
or
similar
use.
Proposed
work
includes
new
raised
foundation
piers,
new
rim
joist,
and
new
framing
where
existing
materials
are
damaged.
Where
applicable
and
appropriate,
additional
materials
can
be
salvaged
from
the
other
cottages.
The
rebuilt
structure
would
comply
with
FEMA,
the
bottom
of
the
framing
not
less
than
1
ft.
above
the
base
Rlood
elevation.
Certain
historic
features,
ie
front
stairs,
railings,
canopy,
etc.
should
be
retained
to
the
extent
possible.
Hazardous
materials
would
be
removed.
New
materials
would
be
required
for
certain
trades,
ie
fenestration,
trim,
rooRing,
gutters,
plumbing,
electrical.
Other
interior
and
exterior
Rinishes
and
Rixtures
would
be
salvaged,
repaired,
or
replicated
to
aesthetically
match
the
original
construction.
Cottages
#6
and
#7
are
both
severely
damaged
and
are
not
suitable
candidates
for
complete
restoration.
The
two
buildings
are
in
urgent
need
of
repairs.
Structural
bracing
and/or
sheathing
is
needed
to
at
the
cottage
interior
walls,
Rloors,
and
roofs
to
prevent
further
damage
or
collapse.
Hazardous
materials
would
be
removed.
Proposed
work
also
includes
exterior
restoration,
including
salvaged
or
replicated
siding,
trim,
windows,
doors,
awnings,
etc.
The
exterior
doors
and
windows
should
be
sealed
to
prevent
occupancy.
As
unoccupied
buildings,
the
two
cottages
would
not
need
to
be
brought
up
to
current
codes
or
raised
above
the
FEMA
base
Rlood
elevation.
As
part
of
a
museum-‐like
experience,
the
two
cottages
could
then
remain
onsite
as
two
intact
historic
buildings.
The
recommended
priority
of
work
is
Cottages
#5,
then
6,
and
then
7.
These
cottages
were
built
in
the
1920‘s
and
exemplify
the
character
of
the
Rishing
camp.
Cottage
#8
was
built
in
the
1950‘s
and
is
the
least
signiRicant
structure,
both
historically
and
architecturally.
Cottage
#8
is
severely
damaged,
structurally
unsound,
and
contaminated
with
mold
and
asbestos.
Recommendation
is
condemnation
and
demolition.
7
Recommended
sitework
includes
Rill,
regrading,
landscaping,
removal
of
one
large
Norfolk
Pine
tree,
a
new
picket
fence
and
gates,
security
lighting,
and
new
walkways
and
decks
to
provide
an
accessible
route
from
the
street
to
the
occupied
Cottage
#5.
Proposed
restoration
of
the
Cistern
adjacent
to
cottage
#8
could
be
limited
to
refurbishing
the
exterior
surfaces.
The
Cistern
can
be
left
as
a
non-‐functional
artifact
and
left
in
place
with
signs
and
photographs
explaining
its
historic
signiRicance.
If
funds
are
available,
the
Cistern
could
be
repaired
and
reRitted
to
collect
rainwater
usable
for
non-‐potable
landscape
irrigation
purposes.
An
outdoor
open-‐air
Gazebo
with
architectural
elements
circa
1920’s
could
also
be
added
as
part
of
the
Margood
Interpretive
Center
with
signs
indicating
the
various
structures
of
historic
signiRicance
onsite.
The
Gazebo
would
also
be
available
to
the
community
for
public
events,
the
local
arts
council,
and
Parks
and
Recreation
programs.
PRELIMINARY
CONSTRUCTION
COST
ESTIMATE
The
preliminary
estimated
cost
of
construction
including
engineering
fees,
property
survey
update,
permits,
and
contingency
is
approximately
$700,000.00
A
more
detailed
preliminary
scope
of
work
and
preliminary
construction
cost
estimate
are
attached
as
appendices
to
this
report.
These
are
preliminary
documents
and
do
not
include
future
changes
in
the
construction
market,
terms
of
contracts
and
payments,
and
other
conditions
not
apparent
at
the
time
this
report
was
prepared.
Please
feel
free
to
call
if
you
have
any
questions
or
need
additional
information.
Respectfully
Submitted,
Victor
J
Latavish,
AIA
Florida
Registered
Architect
AR11942
8
APPENDIX
A
RESTORATION
PLANS
A1
EXISTING
COTTAGE
SITE
PLAN
A2
PRELIMINARY
COTTAGE
RESTORATION
SITE
PLAN
A3
ALTERNATE
PRELIMINARY
COTTAGE
RESTORATION
SITE
PLAN
A4
MARGOOD
HARBOR
PARK
SITE
PLAN
A5
COTTAGE
#5
PLAN
&
ELEVATIONS
A6
COTTAGE
#6
PLAN
&
ELEVATIONS
A7
COTTAGE
#7
PLAN
&
ELEVATIONS
A8
COTTAGE
#8
PLAN
&
ELEVATIONS
APPENDIX
B
PRELIMINARY
CONSTRUCTION
COST
AND
PROJECT
BUDGET
MARGOOD
COTTAGES-‐
PRELIMINARY
CONSTRUCTION
BUDGET-‐
07-‐27-‐17
Cottage
#5 Reconstruction 232,254.00$
Cottage
#6 Refurbish,
Partial 136,026.00$
Cottage
#7 Refurbish,
Partial 140,481.00$
Cottage
#8 Demolition 35,000.00$
Cistern Refurbish,
Exterior 3,000.00$
Sitework Sidewalks,
Fences,
Landscaping 28,000.00$
Subtotal 574,761.00$
Contingency 28,738.05$
Preliminary
Construction
Cost
Estimate 603,499.00$
Survey,
Engineering,
Fees,
Permits,
Est.90,524.85$
Preliminary
Project
Budget 694,024.00$
COTTAGE
#5
Div Description Subcontract Labor Materials Subtotal
Div
#1 General
Services -‐$
6,000.00$
3,000.00$
9,000.00$
Div
#2 Site
Work 6,000.00$
6,000.00$
Div
#2 Selective
Demolition -‐$
6,200.00$
500.00$
6,700.00$
Div
#3 Concrete -‐$
3,800.00$
5,500.00$
9,300.00$
Div
#5 Metals -‐$
300.00$
300.00$
Div
#6 Carpentry
Rough 28,500.00$
7,300.00$
19,000.00$
54,800.00$
Div
#6 Carpentry
Finish 5,000.00$
2,500.00$
7,500.00$
Div
#6 Cabinetry 3,500.00$
1,000.00$
4,500.00$
Div
#7 Thermal/Moisture/Roof 14,500.00$
14,500.00$
Div
#8 Doors/Windows/Shutters -‐$
3,000.00$
6,500.00$
9,500.00$
Div
#9 Finishes/Paint 4,500.00$
4,500.00$
Div
#9 Finishes/Flooring 5,000.00$
1,500.00$
1,500.00$
8,000.00$
Div
#10 Specialties 9,400.00$
9,400.00$
Div
#15 Mechanical 5,000.00$
5,000.00$
Div
#16 Electric 7,400.00$
7,400.00$
Subtotal 156,400.00$
On
Site
Supervision 23,460.00$
Contractor
P&O 31,280.00$
Contingency 21,114.00$
Preliminary
Budget 232,254.00$
COTTAGE
#6
Div Description Subcontractor Labor Materials Subtotal
Div
#1 General
Services 1,500.00$
250.00$
1,750.00$
Div
#2 Site
Work 4,000.00$
4,000.00$
Div
#2 Selective
Demolition -‐$
3,600.00$
-‐$
3,600.00$
Div
#4 Concrete -‐$
3,800.00$
5,500.00$
9,300.00$
Div
#5 Metals -‐$
150.00$
-‐$
150.00$
Div
#6 Carpentry
Rough 26,000.00$
7,300.00$
19,000.00$
52,300.00$
Div
#6 Carpentry
Finish -‐$
-‐$
Div
#6 Cabinetry -‐$
-‐$
Div
#7 Thermal/Moisture/Roof 7,500.00$
7,500.00$
Div
#8 Ext
Doors
and
Windows -‐$
3,000.00$
5,500.00$
8,500.00$
Div
#9 Finishes/Paint 3,000.00$
3,000.00$
Div
#9 Finishes/Flooring -‐$
-‐$
Div
#10 Specialties 1,500.00$
1,500.00$
Div
#15 Mechanical-‐Plumbing -‐$
-‐$
Div
#16 Electric -‐$
-‐$
Subtotal 91,600.00$
On
Site
Supervision 13,740.00$
Contractor
P&O 18,320.00$
Contingency 12,366.00$
Preliminary
Budget 136,026.00$
COTTAGE
#7
Div Description Subcontractor Labor Materials Subtotal
Div
#1 General
Services 1,500.00$
250.00$
1,750.00$
Div
#2 Site
Work 4,000.00$
4,000.00$
Div
#2 Selective
Demolition -‐$
3,600.00$
-‐$
3,600.00$
Div
#4 Concrete -‐$
3,800.00$
5,500.00$
9,300.00$
Div
#5 Metals -‐$
150.00$
-‐$
150.00$
Div
#6 Carpentry
Rough 28,000.00$
7,300.00$
20,000.00$
55,300.00$
Div
#6 Carpentry
Finish -‐$
-‐$
Div
#6 Cabinetry -‐$
-‐$
Div
#7 Thermal/Moisture/Roof 7,500.00$
7,500.00$
Div
#8 Ext
Doors
and
Windows -‐$
3,000.00$
5,500.00$
8,500.00$
Div
#9 Finishes/Paint 3,000.00$
3,000.00$
Div
#9 Finishes/Flooring -‐$
-‐$
Div
#10 Specialties 1,500.00$
1,500.00$
Div
#15 Mechanical-‐Plumbing -‐$
-‐$
Div
#16 Electric -‐$
-‐$
Subtotal 94,600.00$
On
Site
Supervision 14,190.00$
Contractor
P&O 18,920.00$
ContingencyContingency 12,771.00$
Preliminary
Budget 140,481.00$
APPENDIX
C
STRUCTURAL
ENGINEERS
REPORT
Liebl & Barrow Engineering, Inc.
Structural Engineering ● Threshold Inspection
10970 South Cleveland Avenue Suite #105 Fort Myers, FL 33907
Phone 239-936-7557 Fax 239-936-6817 Email: info@lieblandbarrow.com
June 6, 2017
Victor Latavish
4100 Corporate Square, Suite 100
Naples, FL 34104
Re: Margood Cottages Structural Inspection
Dear Mr. Latavish,
Per your request a representative of Liebl and Barrow Engineering, Inc. inspected the
Margood cottages on Tuesday, May 30, 2017. The cottages are located just north-east of
Margood Harbor Park (refer to architectural sheet A-1 by Victor Latavish Architect for
site layout and cottage designations). The scope of inspection was to assess structural
integrity of the the historic (circa 1940-1950) construction and provide recommendations
for restoration.
Observations, Discussion, Recommendations:
The following observations, unless noted otherwise, apply to cottages numbered 5,6,7,
and 8 without reservation.
Foundations/piers: Majority of the piers have spalling concrete with exposed rebar
(Image 4). The degree of spalling and rust suggests that the piers will need to be replaced.
The footings appear undersized to anchor the building(s) against uplift, as would be
dictated by current code, and will also need to be replaced.
Floor joists: A majority of floor joists appear to be in serviceable condition . Some of
these joists may be reused (Image 7); however, this would require a more thorough, joist
by joist, investigation to determine beyond a reasonable doubt which members are
structurally sound (Image 8, ex. Joist starting to deteriorate).
Floor sheathing: The existing sheathing is deteriorated beyond repair. Isolated areas ( in
cottage #7 in particular) have no structural integrity, and are dangerous to walk on. All
floor sheathing should be replaced.
Joist rim boards: The joist rim boards are fully rotten and ineffective for structural
purposes – they need to be replaced in entirety (Image 2 and Image 3).
Margood Cottages
June 6, 2017 – Page 2 of 6
Wall studs: The vast majority of wall studs are rotten and/or have been eaten by termites
(Images 1 & 8). It might be possible to salvage a few intact studs – if they are to be
reused, it is recommended that they are left for non-structural purposes.
Wall sheathing: Exterior wall sheathing consists of 1x boards – these vary in condition
from poor to disintegrated, and would have to be replaced (Images 1 & 2). (Please see
paragraph two in additional remarks for discussion on lateral wall bracing).
Rafters/trusses: The roof members are the best preserved wood on site, with many in an
acceptable/good condition (Image 5). However, rot and termite damage is present in areas
of water infiltration and retention – primarily around the exterior wall and overhangs
(Image 6). A more thorough, piece by piece investigation is needed to determine which
members are structurally sound for reuse purposes.
Roof sheathing: The V-crimp metal deck appears to be at the end of its serviceability
lifecycle and should be replaced (Image 10). In addition, no continuous rigid diaphragm
is provided to support the V-crimp. New plywood sheathing will be necessary to brings
structure up to code.
Entry stairs and railing: The entry stairs and pipe railings visually appear to be in good
condition (Image 9) – it should be possible to re-use them with minor corrective work.
Additional Remarks:
The east and west walls of cottage #8 appear to have a continuous 2x4 plate cutting
through the wall studs at approximately half height. Structurally, this forms a “pin”
connection, and is an unacceptable method of wall construction. As such, this building
should be condemned or dismantled. The interior wall between the cottage and the
“garage”, however, is in sound condition, and could potentially be reused (pending
thorough investigation for rot and termite damage).
The structures(s) appear to be laterally braced by diagonal 2x6 members located at the
ends of walls. It may be possible to replicate such a system to handle wind loads based on
the current building codes, however, the use of plywood sheathing should not be ruled
out.
Final Recommendations:
Due to the high degree of decay it is recommended that the existing structures be
condemned, demolished or dismantled. It may be possible to salvage existing 2x wood
members from joists, trusses, or walls to recreate non-structural elements of the cottages.
The concrete stairs and pipe railing can be reused if the structures are to be rebuilt
(application of paint and/or galvanizing required on the piping).
Margood Cottages
June 6, 2017 – Page 4 of 6
Image 1: Rotten siding Image 2: Rotten siding & rim board
Image 3: Rotten siding, rim board and studs Image 4: Spalling pier with exposed rebar
Margood Cottages
June 6, 2017 – Page 5 of 6
Image 5: Truss/rafter-typical condition Image 6: End of truss/rafter showing
Image 7: Floor joists, typical condition(s)
Image 8: Floor joist and sheathing
Showing signs of rot
Margood Cottages
June 6, 2017 – Page 6 of 6
Image 9: Concrete stair and railing
Image 10: Overall, typical condition
C,Rff",QounW
ffice of Management & Budget
Grant Application Reviewed and Approved by County
an r, or desig
/
County M
k date
After-the-Fact Approval by the BCC is required at the
.lune 26,2018 BCC meeting
FROM:v
RE:County Manager review and approval of a submittal of a Small Matching Grant Application for
the Margood Harbor Park Historic Cottage Site to the Florida Department of State, Division of
Historic Resources in the amount of $100,000
The Collier County Parks and Recreation Division is applying for a Small Matching grant to prepare architectural
drawings and landscape plans for the Margood Harbor Park Historic Cottage site.
lf approved the period of performance is anticipated lo be 711119 through 6/30/20 for a total grant award of
$100,000. The Small Matching Grant has a local match requirement of 100% or $50,000. This requirement will
be met through Parks Capital Fund 306, Projects 8Q322 and 80370 in the amounts of $15,000 and $35,000
respectively.
The Small Matching Grant requires an electronic signature and submittal by an authorized representative via the
DOS Grants System - a system unique to the grantor agency. As such, this request also approves the County
Manager or his designee as the authorize representative throughout the life cycle of the grant.
The notice of funding was released on March 28,2018. The Small Matching grant application is due June 01,
20'18. Due to this expedited schedule, we are asking for your approval to submit the application, followed by
After the Fact approval by the Board of County Commissioners at the June 26, 2018 BCC meeting. Once you
have reviewed the application, please sign in the box above and in the areas marked throughout the application
and call me for pickup at 239-252-2959.
Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions regarding lhis request.
Leo E. Ochs, Jr.,
County Manager
Carrie Drew
Operations Analyst, Parks
Therese Stanley
Grant Compliance Manager, OMB
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 201 . Naptes, FIonda 34112-5746 .289.252-8973 . FAX 2i9-2S2,8828
TO:
CC:
DATE: May 30, 2018
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AUTHORIZING THE
SUBMISSION OF A SMALL MATCHING HISTORIC
PRESERVATION GRANT APPLICATION TO THE
DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES REQUESTING
$50,000 FOR THE DESIGN AND PLANNING OF
MARGOOD COTTAGES, AND FURTHER
AUTHORIZING AN AMOUNT OF $50,000 AS THE
COUNTY'S REQUIRED MATCHING FUNDS.
WHEREAS, Collier County has the opportunity to apply for funding in the amount
of $50,000 the Small Matching Historic Preservation Grant for the design and planning of
Margood Cottages, with the stipulation of a 1:1 matching funds ratio; and
WHEREAS, funding in the amount of $50,000, necessary for the required match,
is available for immediate use, $15,000 in Fund 306, Parks Capital Project 80322 and
$35,000 in Fund 306, Project 80370.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are hereby adopted.
SECTION 2. That the Board of County Commissioners hereby authorizes an
expenditure of $50,000 to be available by July 1, 2019 for required matching funds for a
grant application to the Florida Division of Historical Resources in quest for funding the
design and planning of the Margood Cottages.
SECTION 3. That this resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
PASSED AND RESOLVED this day of 2018 by the Collier County
Board of County Commissioners.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
LIN
, DEPUTY CLERK
Approved for form and legality:
Jennifer A. Belpedio
Assistant County Attorney
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ANDY SOLIS, CHAIRMAN
T