MPO Agenda 06/08/2018COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
AGENDA
Board of County Commission Chambers
Collier County Government Center
3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor
Naples, FL 34112
June 08, 2018
9:00 AM
Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr., Chair
Councilwoman Linda Penniman, Vice-Chair
Commissioner Penny Taylor
Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq.
Commissioner Burt L. Saunders
Commissioner Donna Fiala
Councilman Reg Buxton
Councilman Joe Batte
Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt
This meeting of the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is open to the public and citizen input is
encouraged. Any person wishing to speak on any scheduled item may do so upon recognition of the Chairperson.
Any person desiring to have an item placed on the agenda shall make a request in writing with a description and
summary of the item, to the MPO Director or MPO Chairman 14 days prior to the date of the next scheduled
meeting of the MPO. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the
proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. In accordance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act, any person requiring special accommodations to participate in this meeting
should contact Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director, 72 hours prior to the meeting by calling (239) 252 -
8192. The MPO’s planning process is conducted in accordance with Title V I of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and
Related Statutes. Any person or beneficiary who believes that within the MPO’s planning process they have been
discriminated against because of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, disability, or familial status may file
a complaint with the Collier MPO Executive Director, Anne McLaughlin at (239) 252 -8192 or by writing to Ms.
McLaughlin at 2885 South Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA, PREVIOUS MINUTES AND CONSENT ITEMS
4.A. May 11, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes
4.B. May 25, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes
4.C. Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant Application
and Resolution 2018-05
4.D. Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update
4.E. Appointment of a new Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) member
4.F. Appointment of a new CAC member
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
6. AGENCY UPDATES
6.A. FDOT
6.B. MPO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
7. COMMITTEE CHAIR REPORTS
7.A. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC)
7.A.1. Citizens Advisory Committee Report
7.B. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
7.B.1. Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
7.C. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC)
7.C.1. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report
7.D. LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD
7.D.1. Local Coordinating Board Chair Report
8. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (ROLL CALL REQUIRED)
8.A. Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP)
9. REGULAR BOARD ACTION (NO ROLL CALL)
9.A. Approve 2018 Regional Priorities
9.B. Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement
10. PRESENTATIONS (MAY REQUIRE BOARD ACTION)
10.A. Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan Update
11. MEMBER COMMENTS
12. DISTRIBUTION ITEMS
13. NEXT MEETING DATE
13.A. Regular Meeting - September 14, 2018 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County Commissioners
Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112
14. ADJOURN
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.A
Item Summary: May 11, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
05/31/2018 1:33 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
05/31/2018 1:33 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 05/31/2018 1:33 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 05/31/2018 3:26 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
4.A
Packet Pg. 4
1
COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) BOARD MEETING
MINUTES
Board of County Commissioners Chambers
3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples
9:00 a.m. May 11, 2018
1. Call to Order
Commissioner McDaniel called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. Roll Call
Ms. Otero called the roll and confirmed a quorum was present.
Members Present
Chair Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr., Collier County BCC District 5; Commissioner
Penny Taylor, Collier County BCC District 4; Vice-Chair Commissioner Andy Solis, Collier
County BCC District 2; Councilwoman Linda Penniman, City of Naples; Councilman Reg Buxton,
City of Naples; Commissioner, Burt Saunders, Collier County BCC District 3; Councilman Joe
Batte, City of Marco Island; Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt, City of Everglades City.
Members Absent: Commissioner Donna Fiala, Collier County BCC District 1.
Staff: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director; Brandy Otero, MPO Senior Planner; Eric
Ortman, MPO Senior Planner;
Others Present: Scott Teach, Deputy County Attorney; Trinity Scott, Collier County
Transportation Planning; Lorraine Lantz, Collier County Transportation Planning; Wally Blain,
Tindale Oliver Associates; Randy Farwell, Tindale Oliver Associates; Katie Habgood, Jacobs
Engineering; Victoria Peters, FDOT; Michelle Arnold, Director, Public Transportation and
Neighborhood Enhancement; LK Nandam, FDOT; Thaddeus Cohen, Department Head, Growth
Management Department; Garrett Beyrent, Citizen; Gary Shirk, CAC Chair; Joseph Bonness,
BPAC Chair; Rae Ann Burton, Citizen; Robert Anderson, Citizen; Nicole Johnson, Conservancy
of Southwest Florida; Patricia Huff, Citizen; Fred Thomas, Citizen; Charlotte Nycklemoe, League
of Women Voters; Pat Utter, Collier Enterprises
3. Pledge of Allegiance
Chairman McDaniel led the Pledge of Allegiance.
4. Approval of the Agenda, Previous Minutes, and Consent Items
4A April 13, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes
Commissioner Solis moved to approve the minutes of the April 13, 2018 meeting subject to
revising Rae Ann Burton’s petition submittal to 36 signatures. Second by Councilman
Batte. Carried unanimously 8 – 0.
4.B Reappointment of Victor Ordija to the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC)
Executive Summary “Reappointment of Victor Ordija to the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory
Committee (BPAC),”
4.C Appointment of a new CAC member
Executive Summary “Appointment of a new CAC member.”
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: May 11, 2018 MPO Minutes (5824 : May 11, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
2
Commissioner Solis moved to approve the Agenda subject to hearing Item 9.C before Item
8.A, addition of Item 5.a Volunteer Recognitions. Said motion to include approving of
Items 4.B and 4.C listed in the Consent Agenda. Second by Councilman Buxton. Carried
unanimously 8 – 0.
5. Public Comments for Items Not on the Agenda
Garrett Beyrent provided a handout regarding a Tourist Development Project.
5.A Volunteer Recognitions
The Members recognized Patricia Huff and Fred Thomas for their service to the County.
6. Agency Updates
A. FDOT
Ms. Peters, FDOT reported the State Road 29 Immokalee Project Development and
Environmental (PD&E) study continues including identifying funding sources. The study will
be coordinated with the MPO and the BCC.
B. MPO Executive Director
Ms. McLaughlin reported:
Gabrielle Gonzalez, MPO Administrative Secretary left the Organization for a new
position in the County.
Bill Moss, Naples City Manager provided a letter to Staff on the City’s position on the
FDOT’s Traffic Management Center Co-location Feasibility Study – Chairman
McDaniel reported the item will be addressed under Item 12.
7. Committee Chair Reports
7.A Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)
Staff provided the Executive Summary “Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report” for
information purposes.
7.A.1 Citizen Advisory Committee Chair Report
Gary Shirk reported a meeting was held on 4/30/2018 where the Committee:
Reviewed the update on Golden Gate Community Walkability Study.
Reviewed the CAT Fare Study.
Endorsed the proposed amendments to the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan.
Endorsed the FY18/19–FY19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).
Endorsed the 2018 Project Priorities.
7.B Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
Staff provided the Executive Summary “Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report” for
information purposes.
7.B.1 Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
Ms. McLaughlin reported a meeting was held on 4/30/2018 where the Committee
endorsed:
The proposed amendments to the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan.
The FY18/19–FY19/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: May 11, 2018 MPO Minutes (5824 : May 11, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
3
The 2018 Project Priorities with the exception of Congestion Management
requesting further assessment of project status by the Congestion Management
Committee and reporting back to the TAC.
The CAT Fare Study.
7.C Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC)
Staff provided the Executive Summary “BPAC Committee Chair Report Bicycle and
Pedestrian Advisory Committee” for information purposes.
7.C.1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) Chair Report
Joseph Bonness reported the Committee met on 4/17/2018 and noted:
The FDOT resurfacing project on Collier Boulevard between the Judge Jolly Bridge
and Fiddler’s Creek would include six-foot buffered bike lanes on both sides of the
road as part of the Department’s Complete Streets efforts.
Smart Growth America had listed the FDOT’s Design Manual as one of the twelve
best complete street initiatives in the country in 2017.
The Committee received an update on the Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan.
The Committee heard presentations on the Golden Gate City Walkable Community
Study and the Amendment to the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan.
The 2018 Bicycle and Pedestrian Priorities were distributed to the Committee.
The Committee endorsed the FY2019–FY2023 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP).
The May BPAC meeting is being combined with a stakeholder group meeting for
the Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan and will be held on May 21st at 10:30 a.m.
7.D Local Coordinating Board
Staff provided the Executive Summary “Local Coordinating Board Chair Report” for
information purposes.
7.D.1 Local Coordinating Board Chair Report
Ms. Otero reported there was no quorum for the 5/2/18 meeting and it has been
rescheduled to 5/23/18.
9. Regular Board Action (No Roll Call) - this item was heard before Item 8
9.C Review and Endorse the Collier Area Transit (CAT) Fare Study and
Recommendations
Staff presented the Executive Summary “Review and Endorse the Collier Area Transit
(CAT) Fare Study and Recommendations” for consideration.
Randy Farwell, Tindale Oliver presented the PowerPoint “CAT Fare Study Executive
Summary March 2018 Draft 2018” highlighting:
The study analyzed the fixed route and paratransit fare to identify fare policy
recommendations and assessed potential ridership and revenue impacts with a goal
of minimizing adverse impacts on low income and minority persons as required by
the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) ‐ Title VI.
In addition to data analysis, a public outreach campaign was undertaken to help
formulate the recommendations.
Generally, a majority of users supported fare increases if the additional revenue
yielded increased levels of service.
The recommendations for fixed route include:
Full Fixed Route Fare $1.50/$0.75 to $2.00/$1.00
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: May 11, 2018 MPO Minutes (5824 : May 11, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
4
Transfer Full/Reduced $0.75/$0.35 to Free 90 min
Children Age 5 & Under Free Age 5 & Under Free
Day Pass Full/Reduced $4.00/$2.00 to $3.00/$1.50
7‐Day Pass Full/Reduced $15.00/$7.50 N/A
15‐Day Pass Full/Reduced - (new) N/A to $20.00/$10.00
30‐Day Pass Full/Reduced $35.00/$17.50 to $40.00/$20.00
Marco Express Single FareFull/Reduced $2.50/$1.20 to $3.00/$1.50
The recommendations for the paratransit service include:
No fare change to ADA or for lowest‐income TD fares (paying $1, $3, or
$4).
Reduce income‐based TD fare categories to streamline collection and
administration (riders now paying $5 and $7 will pay $4).
Postponing any ADA fare increase within next two years to provide time to
monitor ridership and revenue
Explore the feasibility of an unlimited paratransit pass and/or reduced cost
trip.
Other general recommendations include:
Exploring increased sale of passes at third party vendors and use of
smartphone applications to be used as passes/fares options.
Include college‐age students and active/retired military personnel as
reduced‐fare eligible for fixed‐route (with valid ID).
Incentivize Business Pass Program by maintaining a corporate 30‐day pass
rate of $29.75 if regular 30‐day pass price increases to $40.
Implement a free transit day to attract infrequent or new riders.
The recommendations will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners on June
12th who must approve via resolution for the fare changes to be adopted.
Under Board discussion, the following was noted:
The methodology used in determining the recommended fares included measuring
the elasticity of fares and other model combinations.
The goal for CAT is to provide equitable fares as public transportation operations
(versus capital projects) in general do not “break even” given the nature of the
service provided to the public.
The consultant analyzed a variety of scenarios for the fare structure and various
advisory boards including the Technical Advisory Committee provided input on the
study.
The public outreach occurred via surveys, comments at public meetings, onsite
interviews with riders at the transfer stations, etc.
The beach trolley is a free service provided by the program and was not a subject of
the study.
The cost per rider is $5.00 for the fixed route and $34.00 for the paratransit user.
Funding sources include the General Fund, grants and user fees with a goal to
narrow the gap between user fees and the money required from the General Fund.
Investigation occurs to determine if employers who benefit from express services
may potentially provide some assistance to the program.
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: May 11, 2018 MPO Minutes (5824 : May 11, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
5
Councilwoman Penniman moved to approve the Fare Study and associated
recommendations. Second by Councilman Batte. Carried unanimously 8 – 0.
8. Regular Board Action (Roll Call Required)
8.A Approve the Proposed 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Amendment
Executive Summary
Ms. Otero presented the Executive Summary “Approve the Proposed 2040 Long Range
Transportation Plan (LRTP) Amendment” for consideration.
Mr. Blain presented the PowerPoint “Collier MPO 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
Amendment – May 11, 2018” highlighting:
The purpose of the amendment is to incorporate impacts for the proposed Rural
Lands West (RLW) development, update to the 2040 LRTP socioeconomic land use
data, list of corridor needs and list of cost feasible projects including future growth
reallocations.
The amendment identifies the following Needs Networks pending BOCC
recommendations on the Randall Blvd./Oil Well Road Corridor Study.
Alternative 2a – Randall / S-Curve / Oil Well (6 lane corridor)
Alternative 3a – Randall Extension / Oil Well (6 lane corridor)
Big Cypress Parkway 2 lanes
Vanderbilt Beach Road and Golden Gate Blvd extended to Big Cypress
Parkway.
The proposed amendment also identifies costs for the various needs with
alternatives identified for Randall Blvd. (Alternative 2a – Randall / S-Curve / Oil
Well - 6 lane corridor - $2.469 billion and Alternative 3a – Randall Extension / Oil
Well - 6 lane corridor - $2.467 billion totals).
The prioritization scoring was based on the same criteria from the LRTP 2015
Working Group (System Connectivity, Evacuation Route, Reduce Congestion,
Wetland Impact, Species Impact, Freight Route).
The Randall Blvd. widening and connection from 8th Street to Oil Well
Road/Everglades (S-Curve) and Vanderbilt Beach Extension from 8th to Desoto (2
lanes within 4 lanes ROW) were removed from 2015 adopted plan and proposed to
be added back into the plan.
The activity included convening public meetings, acquiring written comments
which yielded a concern regarding alignment of Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension
and opposition to S-Curve Alignment in Randall/Oil Well Corridor Study,
questions on Impact Fees and required developer payments, concern for wildlife
and species habitat impacts, etc.
The Technical Advisory Committee and Citizens Advisory Committee endorsed the
proposed amendments.
Under Board discussion,
Concern the amendments may be premature given the initiatives address
development projects not yet approved without the funding sources identified - Staff
noted the collection of impact fee revenue is projected through 2040 and
incorporated into the analysis.
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: May 11, 2018 MPO Minutes (5824 : May 11, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
6
Concern the parties benefiting from the improvements may not be adequately
participating in funding the improvements – Staff noted there will be further
negotiations by the BCC as developments come forward.
Concern funding sources utilized in the analysis (i.e. gas tax) may be substantially
less in the future given the fuel efficiency of future vehicles.
Speakers
Rae Ann Burton expressed concerns on the overall plan and widening of Randall Blvd.
which benefits new developments and not the existing residents. She requested the
widening of Randall Blvd. and construction of the new “S-curve” be removed from the
plan.
Robert Anderson expressed concern on the potential lack of return on investment of the
projects and requested the “S curve” be removed from the plan.
Nicole Johnson, Conservancy of Southwest Florida noted the proposed amendments are
premature given they are based on potential developments. She recommended the
amendments not be adopted and the items be addressed during the 2045 LRTP.
Charlotte Nycklemoe, League of Women Voters noted that the proposal is premature
and the items should be addressed in 2045 LRTP. Portions of the roads are internal to
proposed developments with no significant benefit to residents of County or City of Naples
who will be paying for the improvements. She will provide written comment to the Board
their suggestions.
Pat Utter, Collier Enterprises noted the proposals define projections and needs for future
growth, not approvals for development specific to Rural Lands West. The projects added
have been planned for a long time and should remain in the proposed plan. RLW will be
mitigating any impacts for the roads in their development, not the County.
Ms. McLaughlin reported the MPO has an obligation to plan for future growth and Staff
recommends the proposed amendments be adopted.
Commissioner Saunders moved to adopt the 2040 LRTP Amendment Adoption Report
including recommendations for the Needs Plan and the Cost Feasible Plan. Second by
Commissioner Solis.
During Board discussions, the following was noted:
The document is a long range planning tool with certain items (e.g. Randall Blvd. S
Curve) ultimately being considered by the BOCC at a later. These decisions will be
aided by the results of the Randall Blvd./Oil Well Road Corridor study.
The document may be utilized by governing bodies as a tool in negotiations with
those proposing future developments.
Concerns on the levels of the funding required to implement the plan versus the
available revenue sources identified at this point in time.
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: May 11, 2018 MPO Minutes (5824 : May 11, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
7
Roll Call vote was taken and the motion failed 4 “yes” – 4 “no.” Chairman McDaniel,
Commissioner Saunders, Councilman Batte and Commissioner Solis voted “yes.” Vice
Mayor Penniman, Councilman Buxton, Councilwoman Middelstaedt and Commissioner
Taylor voted “no.”
Break: 11:07am
Reconvened: 11:25am
9. Regular Board Action (No Roll Call) - Continued
9.A Adopt Policy on Reprogramming Unobligated SU Funds
Ms. Otero presented the Executive Summary “Adopt Policy on Reprogramming
Unobligated SU Funds” for consideration. Staff recommends approval of the Resolution.
Commissioner Saunders moved to approve Resolution 2018-02, establishing policy on
the use and reprogramming of available Surface Transportation-Urban Funds to cover
cost over-runs on Local Agency and FDOT managed projects. Second by Councilman
Buxton. Motion carried 6 “yes” – 1 “no.” Vice Mayor Penniman voted “no.”
9.B Approve the FY 2018/19-2019/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) and MPO
Agreement
Ms. Otero presented the Executive Summary “Approve the FY 2018/19-2019/20 Unified
Planning Work Program (UPWP) and MPO Agreement” for consideration. She requested
the Board approve the FY 2018/19- 2019/20 UPWP, the MPO Agreement and the attached
Resolution.
Commissioner Solis moved to approve the FY 2018/19- 2019/20 UPWP, the MPO
Agreement and associated Resolution. Second by Vice Mayor Penniman. Carried
unanimously 7 – 0.
9.D Adopt Updated Project Priorities for 2018
Ms. McLaughlin presented the Executive Summary “Adopt Updated Project Priorities for
2018” for consideration. She requested the Board adopt the attached updated project
priorities for 2018 and noted the focus is on the first two priorities (bridge construction for
16th Street NE, south of 10th Ave NE - $8,000,000 and PD&E for bridge at 47th Avenue
NE, west of Everglades Boulevard).
Councilwoman Penniman moved to adopt the updated project priorities for 2018 as
presented by Staff. Second by Councilman Buxton. Carried unanimously 7 – 0.
10. Presentations (May Require Board Action)
10.A Review of Draft Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study
Staff presented the Executive Summary “Review of Draft Golden Gate City Walkable
Community Study” for information purposes.
Katie Habgood, Jacobs Engineering presented the PowerPoint “Golden Gate City
Walkable Community Study Draft Collier MPO Board May 11, 2018” for information
purposes highlighting:
The study was completed via data analysis of the existing conditions and extensive
public & stakeholder outreach efforts.
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: May 11, 2018 MPO Minutes (5824 : May 11, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
8
The scoring priorities included the proximity to schools, transit stops and uses by
pedestrian or bicyclist (weighted most heavily).
The findings concluded the area is at an “E” level service and the draft
recommendations include focusing on infrastructure gaps, exploring other projects
and programs and not to “be afraid to try something that hasn’t been done before.”
Other concepts include implementing measures such as early school release for
walkers and bikers, painted intersections, roundabouts, wider walkways to schools,
shade tree planting projects, etc.
The next steps include collecting comments and recommendations from
Committees and others with adoption of the plan by the BOCC slated for June of
2018.
Commissioner Taylor returned at 11:50am.
10.B Update on Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Mr. Ortman presented the Executive Summary “Update on Bicycle & Pedestrian Master
Plan” for information purposes and PowerPoint “Board Update May 11, 2018” highlighting:
The plan is being developed via input from the public and various stakeholder
groups in order to address safety, connectivity concerns, changes to local roads and
use of multi purpose paths and greenways.
The needs assessment included data analysis for bike crashes.
Proposed policy concepts include implementing regulations and design
requirements for connections between developments and the bike/ped network;
interconnections between developments and bicycle parking; improved roadway
designs including 6 ft sidewalk one side, 10-12’ trail other side, consistent transition
of begin/end of bike lanes; wider shoulders on high speed roadways; pedestrian
crossing opportunities; signalized trail/roadway crossings – signalized, considering
use of buffered bicycle lanes before standard bike lanes on all resurfacing and
capacity projects, etc.
The next steps include refining needs, prioritizing criteria, developing planning
level costs, identifying funding sources, etc.
11. Member Comments
Commissioner Taylor requested Staff clarify a timeline concern brought to her attention on the
proposed amendments to the Long Range Transportation Plan.
Ms. Scott reported that on after May 27, 2018, any amendments to the Long Range Transportation
Plan must conform to the new requirements from the Federal Highway Administration and FDOT
which address new performance measures, targets, etc. Staff is prepared to develop the 2045 plan
under the new requirements but is unsure on the ramifications of proposing changes to existing
plans.
Board discussion occurred on the feasibility of reconsidering the previous motion.
Scott Teach, Deputy County Attorney, notified the Board the County’s policy for
reconsideration requires a party who spoke on an item be allowed to provide further comment on a
reconsideration and expressed concern those members of the public have left the meeting. He
recommended the item be considered at a future meeting.
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: May 11, 2018 MPO Minutes (5824 : May 11, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
9
Commissioner Taylor moved for the MPO Board to schedule another meeting within the
required timeframe to discuss the proposed amendments to the 2040 Long Range
Transportation Plan. Second by Chairman McDaniel. Motion carried 7 “yes” 1 “no.”
Councilwoman Penniman voted “no.”
12. Distribution Items
12.A Naples City Manager Response for Co-location Study
Staff presented the Executive Summary “Naples City Manager Response for Co-location
Study” for consideration. They received a letter dated April 26, 2018 from Bill Moss,
Naples City Manager regarding the FDOT’s report on the Traffic Management Center Co-
location Feasibility Study outlining the City’s desire to maintain the existing facility in the
City.
Commissioner Saunders moved to remove the Item from the Board’s future Agendas. Second
by Chairman McDaniel. Carried unanimously 8 – 0.
14. Next Meeting Date
A. Regular Meeting – June 8, 2018 – 9:00 a.m. Board of County Commissioners Chambers
15. Adjourn
With no further comments Chairman McDaniel adjourned the meeting at approximately
12:18p.m.
4.A.1
Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: May 11, 2018 MPO Minutes (5824 : May 11, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.B
Item Summary: May 25, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
06/01/2018 9:28 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/01/2018 9:28 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/01/2018 9:28 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/01/2018 9:30 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
4.B
Packet Pg. 14
1
COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) BOARD MEETING
MINUTES
Board of County Commissioners Chambers
3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples
9:00 a.m. May 25, 2018
1. Call to Order
Chairman McDaniel called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. Roll Call
Ms. Otero called the roll and confirmed a quorum was present.
Members Present
Chairman - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr., Collier County BCC District 5;
Commissioner Donna Fiala, Collier County BCC District 1; Commissioner Penny Taylor, Collier
County BCC District 4; Vice-Chair Commissioner Andy Solis, Collier County BCC District 2;
Councilwoman Linda Penniman, City of Naples (via telephone); Councilman Reg Buxton, City of
Naples; Commissioner Burt Saunders, Collier County BCC District 3; Councilwoman Elaine
Middelstaedt, City of Everglades City.
Members Absent: Councilman Joe Batte, City of Marco Island;
Staff: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Executive Director; Brandy Otero, MPO Senior Planner; Eric
Ortman, MPO Senior Planner
Others Present: Nick Casalanguida, Deputy County Manager; Scott Teach, Deputy County
Attorney; Amy Patterson, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management;
Lorraine Lantz, Collier County Transportation Planning; Victoria Peters, FDOT; Wayne Gaither,
FDOT; Thaddeus Cohen, Department Head, Growth Management Department; Rae Ann Burton,
Citizen; Robert Anderson, Citizen; David Standen, Citizen; Vicki Standen, Citizen; Nicole
Johnson, Conservancy of Southwest Florida; Judith Hushon, League of Women Voters; Gary
Bromley, Citizen; Michael Seef, Collier Citizens for Sustainability; Gaylene Vasaturo, Citizen;
Michael Ramsey, Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association.
3. Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
4. Approval of the Agenda, Previous Minutes, and Consent Items
Chairman McDaniel moved to allow Vice Mayor Penniman to participate in the meeting via
telephone due to an extraordinary circumstance. Second by Commissioner Solis. Carried
unanimously 8 – 0.
Councilman Buxton moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Commissioner Fiala. Carried
unanimously 8 - 0.
4A MPO Board Meeting Minutes
None
5. Public Comments for Items Not on the Agenda
4.B.1
Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: May 25, 2018 MPO Meeting Minutes (5849 : May 25, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
2
None
6. Agency Updates
A. FDOT
None
B. MPO Executive Director
None
7. Committee Chair Reports
7.A Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)
None
7.A.1 Citizen Advisory Committee Chair Report
None
7.B Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
None
7.B.1 Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
None
7.C Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC)
None
7.C.1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) Chair Report
None
7.D Local Coordinating Board
None
7.D.1 Local Coordinating Board Chair Report
None
8. Regular Board Action (Roll Call Required)
8.A Approve the Proposed 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Amendment
Ms. McLaughlin presented the Executive Summary “Approval of Proposed 2040 Long
Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Amendment” for consideration. She noted:
The motion to approve the proposed 2040 LRTP Amendment failed due to a tie
vote at the May 11th Board meeting.
The Board subsequently approved a motion to schedule another meeting to consider
the 2040 LRTP amendment based on additional relevant information.
The Executive Summary includes information on the new Federal Requirements
effective May 27, 2018 regarding the adoption of LRTP’s and any amendments as
well as other pertinent information.
The proposed amendments include:
Placing 2 roadways on the Cost Feasible Plan (CFP), making them eligible
for the County to pursue funding from a variety of sources: (Vanderbilt
Beach Extension CR 951 to 16th St NE and Randall Blvd Preferred
Alternative based on BOCC’s decision on Randall/Oil Well Corridor
Study).
Adds 1 roadway to the Needs Plan - Big Cypress Parkway.
4.B.1
Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: May 25, 2018 MPO Meeting Minutes (5849 : May 25, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
3
Commissioner Saunders reported he received an email from a member of the pubic
expressing concern on the process and development community’s benefit from the
proposals and he will forward it to the other Board members for the record.
Mr. Casalanguida clarified that Collier County requested that the developer provide
funding for the amendment.
Ms. Mclaughlin reported that MPO staff selected the consultant and managed the project.
Commissioner Taylor reported that she attended a meeting the previous night for the
Randall Blvd Corridor Study. She heard that if nothing is done to Randall Blvd and it
stayed as is today, any new development in the area could not be approved.
Mr. Casalanguida clarified that staff would recommend denial based on current plan. The
BCC could consider those factors. If the developer were to pose a mitigation package and
the project was still denied, then the developer may have a claim.
Commissioner Taylor stated that she has seen an early Developer Contribution
Agreement (DCA) and had concerns with the document.
Mr. Casalanguida reported that the Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA) application and
deviations have nothing to do with the LRTP. Even before this application, the prior
LRTP showed Randall as a need and financially feasible. It was removed because the
Board wanted a better understanding of the needs in the corridor. The Board’s obligation is
too look at all information that is presented regardless of the SRA applications and look at
traffic analysis zones and impacts and determine if we have planned for a network that will
serve that impact.
Commissioner Taylor requested that the DCA be negotiated in the public so the taxpayers
are involved in the process.
Mr. Casalanguida reported that the LRTP is independent of the development and the
SRA. He advised that a local contribution agreement should not be an impediment to the
approval of the LRTP. He stated that the LRTP is a planning tool.
Ms. Lantz presented a Memo dated May 17, 2018, “Re: MPO Board Meeting on May 25,
2018” which outlined the rationale for the previous decisions when the LRTP was adopted
in 2015. She noted:
The intent was to consider what options were available for the Randall Corridor.
There was always a need. The Board acknowledged that at some point in the
future there would be a 2040 LRTP Amendment.
The Board recognized the need for the project, but were concerned the two
alignments of Randall Blvd. remaining on the maps could impact real estate values
based on disclosure requirements of sellers.
At the time, it was the intent of the MPO to undertake amendments to the 2040
LRTP at a later date including the concept of moving the proposed projects to the
CFP.
Although Randall Blvd.’s level of service was acceptable at that time, in 2016
Randall became a failing facility. It has continued to be a failing facility in 2017
4.B.1
Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: May 25, 2018 MPO Meeting Minutes (5849 : May 25, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
4
and the County needs to address the issue since there is a documented need. The
next phase in the LRTP is missing.
A major concern for the County is when the BCC chooses the alignment in
December of 2018, if the improvements are not part of the CFP, there will be no
funding available to move the project to the next stage (i.e. design). At that point,
nothing can be done to help the residents in the area. The Randall/Oil Well
corridor study will not move past the corridor study if there is not a change to the
plan.
At the 2nd public meeting last night for the Randall Blvd./Oil Well Road Corridor
Study, the public in attendance (via surveys) identified that there is a need need to
address the congestion and safety in the area now. 77% of people at the meeting
stated that there is a congestion problem on Randall Blvd now.
Commissioner Fiala stated her understanding that if nothing is approved today, they
cannot move forward with the improvements to Randall Blvd. Mr. Casalanguida
confirmed that her understanding was correct.
Commissioner Taylor noted the public input at the meeting was partially generated from
those who possibly don’t live in the immediate area (41 percent). Ms. Lantz noted the
meeting was open to the public and those participating were users of the corridor in some
manner with concerns over the roads in the area and potentially impacted by any decisions
made for the area.
Councilwoman Penniman expressed concern on the overall planning/funding process
given previously approved developments such as Ave Maria (and others) create a high
demand for roads which contribute to failing levels of service. The decreasing level of
service generally occurs substantially prior to their build out and provision of their total
projected funds (via impact fees, etc.) used to construct improvements. She stated that
concurrency isn’t working. Additionally, in this case, the contribution by the developer for
the projects in the proposed amendments is unknown as no funding agreement has been
executed between the County and developer.
Under discussions with the Board, Mr. Casalanguida noted:
Developer Agreement was 13 years ago and the County’s agreement was to pay
impact fees, provide right of way, and provide discount dirt and fill. The Road was
constructed early than needed. The recession was unexpected. There are 5 other
developers in the area that are all coming forward.
Roads are constructed or improved in advance of build out of developments (i.e.
Ave Maria) with the anticipation of a particular development coming on line at a
certain time and others to follows (Orange Tree, Winchester Lakes, Hogan Island,
etc.).
The developers of these projects do provide funds up front through agreements,
initial impact fees, with additional impact fees anticipated over a time frame the
improvements are needed. At times unforeseen conditions (i.e. economic
recessions) may have a tendency to delay the receipt of additional funds.
The LRTP is a long term planning document designed to address future needs and
not intended to address short term “concurrency of service” items for the change in
land use.
4.B.1
Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: May 25, 2018 MPO Meeting Minutes (5849 : May 25, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
5
Councilwoman Penniman asked if there is a developer agreement with Rural Lands West.
Mr. Casalanguida noted that:
They are in the process of reviewing model internal capture and trip distribution
with the developer and he suggested that the developer have a series of public
meetings so there is complete transparency.
The County is also in the process of negotiating a water/sewer agreement and a
parks agreement. Those won’t be available for the Board until September or
October of this year.
The proposed amendments are not development driven, but address existing issues.
If the development left today, there would still be a need (the failing levels of
service, congestion, safety, etc. in the area as requested by the public)
absent of the needs of RLW or other developments.
Councilwoman Penniman noted that there are currently other failing facilities. She
questioned why we would take care of other roads before we deal with currently failing roads.
She stated that a road that accommodates a new development is not a priority at this time.
Mr. Casalanguida noted that the County is addressing existing and planned failures.
There is a concern delaying the proposed amendments will have an impact on
funding opportunities and the timeline for the improvements requested by the
public. The public understands that there is a congestion issue today, regardless of
what will have with RLW in the future.
There is no formal Developer Contribution Agreement (DCA) with RLW and the
negotiations include not only roads, but water, sewer, parks, etc. as the alignment of
the road network needs to be determined and any RLW priorities before any DCA’s
can be finalized between the parties.
The “alignment” of the roadways will be a BOCC decision at which point
determination will be made on the cost responsibilities for various parties benefiting
from the improvements.
It is anticipated construction in RLW would begin in approximately 2 years and
Staff will update the various parties as necessary on a monthly basis on the RLW
DCA as it navigates the process.
RLW will bear the costs for the internal roads within their development.
Commissioner Taylor noted that the developer is involved in the amendment because they
paid for it. She wanted the developer to be on the record about what they would pay for
Randall Blvd. She stated that the developer understands that Randall Blvd is important to
their development.
Mr. Casalanguida responded that if the Board denies the LRTP Amendment, the SRA
will still come forward. The County will ask the developer to negotiate a developer
agreement and they will respond that if it’s not on the LRTP, there can be no impact fee
credits given. The County turns down the development, the developer could have a claim
since they have done what has been asked.
4.B.1
Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: May 25, 2018 MPO Meeting Minutes (5849 : May 25, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
6
Commissioner Taylor discussed the draft developer agreement and noted her concern
regarding the elements.
Mr. Casalanguida stated that he would not look at the agreement until the modeling is
done and the LRTP amendment is adopted. He noted that developer’s always start asking
for everything and it gets negotiated from there.
Commissioner Taylor noted that she wants the negotiation process to be done in the
public.
Mr. Casalanguida agreed and stated that he would be willing to give the Board of County
Commissioners an update every 30 days, however, that has nothing to do with the LRTP.
Commissioner Solis stated that the alignment and design haven’t been completed so they
would not know what to negotiate.
Mr. Casalanguida responded that the County would have to develop alternative
agreements in order to move forward. If the Board choses Randall Blvd, then the required
improvments would be done and a cost share would be developed. Typically, the money is
applied to what is failing the most, which is currently the Randall/Immokalee intersection
which is approximately a $14 million job. The County currently has about $7 million.
Commissioner Solis restated that the road is failing but we can’t do anything about it
because it’s not in the plan. He stated that there is an obligation to fix the issues, but we
can’t unless it is in the Cost Feasible Plan of the LRTP.
Mr. Casalanguida stated that FDOT has a $1 million PD&E for the intersection, and
Collier County has approximately a $800,000 corridor study and they would both be
shelved if the next phase isn’t identified in the LRTP. The alignment will come to the BCC
for approval. If RLW pulled their application, there is still a problem that needs to be
fixed. The Estates lots are approximately 50% built out and are not subject to concurrency.
Commissioner Fiala stated the LRTP must be approved in order to receive funding. She
asked that if RLW would pay for their own roads why did they need to be a part of this
process. She understood the need to add Randall Blvd and Vanderbilt Beach Extension,
but nothing that the developer would pay.
Mr. Casalanguida reminded the Board of the history in Collier County. In the early
2000’s Norman Feder was hired to build roads. The county borrowed $200,000 in gas tax
debt to address a backlog in projects. He stated that the population in Collier County will
increase regardless of whether roads are constructed. In order to accommodate the
increase, planning must occur and right of way must be reserved.
Commissioner Fiala reiterated that Randall and Vanderbilt Extension must be addressed
now.
Commissioner Taylor presented an excerpt from the draft contribution agreement. She
stated that the developer acknowledges the need of Randall for their development.
4.B.1
Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: May 25, 2018 MPO Meeting Minutes (5849 : May 25, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
7
Mr. Casalanguida stated that if the LRTP is approved, staff will continue with design and
the portion of roadway that should be funded by the developer will be identified.
Commissioner Taylor noted it would be beneficial to postpone the amendments and
consider them under the 2045 LRTP when more detailed information will be known about
the proposed development(s) in the area.
Chairman McDaniel stated that the public speaker portion of the meeting should begin.
Speakers
Rae Ann Burton expressed concern the “S Curve” is being given priority without other
alternatives being totally explored. She felt that the alternatives were created to ensure the
“S” Curve is chosen. She recommended funds be utilized to maintain and improve the
existing infrastructure such as Oil Well Road. Add a parallel road to Randall to address
congestion. More roads create more traffic and create more accidents. She asked that the
Board consider the current needs of homeowners and consider alternatives proposed from
residents.
Robert Anderson provided a presentation and spoke in opposition to the proposed “S
Curve”. He expressed concern that the developer from Rural Lands West proposed the “S”
curve concept. He recommended widening Oil Well Road and incorporating additional
separate access lanes for the schools and develop a pedestrian overpass in the area. He
believed that Oil Well Road had lower construction costs.
Vicki Standen spoke in opposition to the proposed “S Curve” and expressed concern the
proposal will change the nature of the area for those who chose to reside in the
neighborhood to benefit potential future residents. She proposed that the existing east-west
roads be widened to 6 lanes and the existing north – south road be widened to 4 lanes. The
proposals impact dead end streets. She felt that there is a trend to change the landscape of
the estates by sacrificing privacy for easier access of future residents. Eminent Domain
wasn’t designed to take property if a viable alternative exists. She stated there are three
other alternatives. Randall extension for 6 lanes has been on the books and should be kept
that way.
Nicole Johnson, Conservancy of Southwest Florida expressed concern regarding the
SRA and the DCA which indicates the developer is seeking entitlement to all aspects in the
proposed amendments. She provided a copy of an initial draft of the DCA and summarized
her understanding of the proposal. She stated that the developer wanted the amendment
and had written the draft DCA based upon incorporation of the roads in the amendment.
She felt that the 2045 LRTP would be a more appropriate place for these revisions.
Judy Hushon, League of Women Voters stated that the LRTP amendment should be split
apart. She noted the standards utilized for future plans and amendments benefit the public
and it could be advantageous to review the proposals under these requirements. The costs
for any roads developed within private lands serving communities should be borne by the
developer, not the tax payer. The County should not provide funds for those roads. She
suggested the widening of Oil Well or Randall could be done in stages as new development
comes on. She recognized that the roads that were pulled off the 2040 LRTP need to be
4.B.1
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: May 25, 2018 MPO Meeting Minutes (5849 : May 25, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
8
put back on due to existing failures. Roads internal to developments should be paid for by
the developer. The road for Ave Maria was built at citizens expense and they are at 1/3
buildout for their projected development. Money for Oil Well road should have been used
for other things. She was concerned that there is no mention of sea level rise and design
standards for roadways. She stated the Board should wait for the RLSA planning effort to
be completed. There is not enough money to pay for all of the roads in the RLSA. Some
items should be saved for the next LRTP iteration and it must include sea level rise.
Michael Seef noted that the latest population projections clearly delineate low medium and
high population growth. He stated that there is not an urgency in population growth and
that they do not correspond with the actual trends identified in recent data which indicates
the growth in the area may occur at a slower rate.
Commissioner Saunders summarized an email from Michael Seef referring to a back
room deal with the developer. He asked if Mr. Seef had information regarding improper
dealings.
Mr. Seef stated that the action taken at the previous meeting determined the amendments
would not be adopted. He expressed concern over the process by which the item was
brought back for consideration, including any inappropriate contacts that may have
occurred between parties. He felt that back room deal was probably the wrong wording.
Commissioner Taylor reported she voted in opposition to adopting the proposed
amendments at the meeting in question. During the break following consideration of the
item, members of the public provided additional information on the ramifications of not
adopting the amendments at this time. She determined she needed additional information
on the item and led the effort for it to be reconsidered following the break in the meeting.
Other Members noted they did not have any inappropriate contacts with the public or any
other party.
Gaylene Vasaturo recommended Big Cypress Parkway and all connector roads to the
Rural Lands West development be removed from the plan. She stated that the roads were
included in the amendment at the request of Collier Enterprises and directly benefit the
developer. She requested that the MPO hold off on approving the amendment until the
Board of County Commissioners approve the development. She stated that the 2045 LRTP
should address the future development. She also expressed concern on the potential
negative impacts the projects associated with the proposed amendments will have on the
environment. She requested that the MPO Board remove Big Cypress Parkway and all
roads connecting to Big Cypress Parkway from the amendment.
Michael Ramsey, Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association noted the issues in the
area in question is due to traffic moving from east to west through the estates and
bottlenecking at certain points. The bottleneck at Oil Well entering the RLSA is the
primary problem. He explained that the process is complicated for the public to
understand. He stated that when a suggestion is made early in the process, it may lead to
not examining other alternatives as closely. If there is an early alternative presented that
keeps a developer’s contribution low or less, it may result in an unfair cost burden on the
taxpayers in the area. He stated that a study of the Randall/Oil Well corridor is needed
4.B.1
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: May 25, 2018 MPO Meeting Minutes (5849 : May 25, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
9
because it is failing quickly, but they would like all options to be entertained. He felt a
discussion regarding the need for an I-75 interchange to move traffic south to help the flow.
Commissioner McDaniel closed the public speaking portion of the meeting.
Councilwoman Middelstaedt stated that Mr. Casalanguida made a very strong argument
in favor of approving the amendment.
Commissioner Saunders moved to approve the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
amendments as proposed by Staff. Second by Councilman Buxton. Roll call vote was
taken with the motion passing 6 “yes” – 2 “no.”
Commissioner Taylor No
Commissioner Solis Yes
Councilwoman Middlestaedt Yes
Councilwoman Penniman No
Chairman McDaniel Yes
Commissioner Fiala Yes
Councilman Buxton Yes
Commissioner Saunders Yes
9. Regular Board Action (No Roll Call)
None
10. Presentations (May Require Board Action)
None
11. Member Comments
None
12. Distribution Items
None
14. Next Meeting Date
A. Regular Meeting – June 8, 2018 – 9:00 a.m. Board of County Commissioners Chambers
15. Adjourn
With no further comments Commissioner McDaniel adjourned the meeting at approximately
10:40a.m.
4.B.1
Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: May 25, 2018 MPO Meeting Minutes (5849 : May 25, 2018 MPO Board Meeting Minutes)
06/08/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant Application and Resolution
2018-05
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve the FY 2018/19 TD Planning Grant and a supporting resolution.
CONSIDERATIONS: The MPO has the authority to file a TD Planning Grant Application for Collier
County and to undertake a TD service project as authorized by Section 427.0159, Florida Statutes, and
Rule 41-2, Florida Administrative Code. As part of the annual process, the TD Grant Application must
be filed by July 1. The amount requested in the TD Grant application for FY 2018/19 is $26,962. These
funds will be used as described in the FY 2018/19-2019/20 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP),
Task 6 - Transit and Transportation Disadvantaged and the TD Grant Agreement. The planning tasks
include:
Conducting the Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan;
Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) Evaluation;
Staff support at LCB meetings;
Review of LCB bylaws, grievance procedures, reports; and
Conducting LCB training
Attending CTD sponsored training
The FY 2018/19 planning grant allocation is included as Attachment 1. The completed application
(Attachment 2) and resolution (Attachment 3) must be submitted to the TD Commission to receive
funding. Upon approval of the grant application, the TD Commission will provide a grant agreement for
execution. The new grant agreement is expected to be consistent with last year’s agreement (Attachment
4). To have funding in place prior to July 1, 2018, the Board is asked to authorize the Chair to sign the
agreement upon receipt.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) for the Transportation
Disadvantaged endorsed the TD planning grant application and Resolution 2018-05 at its May 23, 2018
meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the TD planning grant application and
Resolution 2018-05 and authorization for the Chair to sign the agreement upon receipt.
Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Collier MPO Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. FY 2018-19 Planning Grant Allocations (PDF)
2. TD Planning Grant Application (PDF)
3. Resolution 2018-05 (PDF)
4. FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (PDF)
4.C
Packet Pg. 24
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.C
Doc ID: 5782
Item Summary: Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant Application
and Resolution 2018-05
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
05/29/2018 1:41 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
05/29/2018 1:41 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 05/29/2018 1:42 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 05/29/2018 1:54 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
4.C
Packet Pg. 25
County Planning
Funds County Planning
Funds
Alachua $24,970 Leon $25,583
Baker $19,988 Levy $20,258
Bay $23,271 Liberty $19,575
Bradford $19,980 Madison $19,798
Brevard $31,578 Manatee $27,074
Broward $59,893 Marion $26,790
Calhoun $19,711 Martin $22,732
Charlotte $23,081 Miami-Dade $77,290
Citrus $22,447 Monroe $21,071
Clay $23,748 Nassau $21,072
Collier $26,962 Okaloosa $23,649
Columbia $20,877 Okeechobee $20,252
DeSoto $20,158 Orange $46,688
Dixie $19,744 Osceola $26,174
Duval $38,970 Palm Beach $49,789
Escambia $26,122 Pasco $30,005
Flagler $21,631 Pinellas $39,810
Franklin $19,649 Polk $33,251
Gadsden $20,398 Putnam $20,966
Gilchrist $19,765 Saint Johns $24,140
Glades $19,687 Saint Lucie $25,765
Gulf $19,739 Santa Rosa $22,956
Hamilton $19,707 Sarasota $28,043
Hardee $19,988 Seminole $29,019
Hendry $20,229 Sumter $21,863
Hernando $23,237 Suwannee $20,344
Highlands $21,543 Taylor $19,886
Hillsborough $48,144 Union $19,724
Holmes $19,820 Volusia $30,494
Indian River $22,553 Wakulla $20,075
Jackson $20,454 Walton $20,732
Jefferson $19,701 Washington $19,930
Lafayette $19,585
Lake $26,296 TOTALS $1,732,620
Lee $34,192
43,210
Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged
Planning Grant Allocations
FY2018-19
4.C.1
Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: FY 2018-19 Planning Grant Allocations (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant Application and
Transportation Disadvantaged
Planning Grant Application Form
PlanningGrantApplicationForm20180412412
Form Revised 4/12/2018
Legal Name Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization
Federal Employer Identification
Number
59‐6000558
Registered Address 2885 South Horseshoe Drive
City and State Naples, FL Zip Code 34104
Contact Person for this Grant Anne McLaughlin Phone Number
Format 111-111-1111
239‐252‐5884
E-Mail Address [Required] Anne.McLaughlin@colliercountyfl.gov
Project Location [County(ies)] Collier Proposed Project
Start Date
07/01/2018
Budget Allocation
Grant Amount Requested $26,962.00
Total Project Amount $ 0.00
I, the authorized Grant Recipient Representative, hereby certify that the information contained in this form is
true and accurate and is submitted in accordance with the 2018-19 Program Manual and Application for the
Planning Grant.
________________________________________________________
Signature of Grant Recipient Representative Date
Name: Anne McLaughlin
TitleMPO Executive Director:
4.C.2
Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: TD Planning Grant Application (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant Application and
4.C.3
Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Resolution 2018-05 (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant Application and Resolution 2018-05)
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
4.C.4
Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: FY 17/18 Executed TD Planning Grant Agreement (5782 : Approval of the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Planning Grant
06/08/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to ratify the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP)
Annual Update.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier MPO is required to submit an Annual Update to the TDSP for 2018. The
TDSP is a multi-year document required by the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged
(CTD) in order to meet the requirements to maintain eligibility for state funding. A major update m ust be
completed every five years, and an annual update is completed on all other years. The TDSP contains
development, service and quality assurance components related to the delivery of the Transportation
Disadvantaged Program.
In accordance with the MPO’s Public Involvement Plan, the document was advertised for a 14-day public
comment period that expired on May 11th. The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) reviewed and approved
the TDSP Annual Update on May 23, 2018. The MPO Board is asked to ratify the 2018 TDSP Annual
Update, which will then be submitted to the CTD before the July 1st due date.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) for the Transportation
Disadvantaged approved the 2018 TDSP Annual Update at its May 23, 2018 meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board ratify the 2018 TDSP Annual
Update.
Prepared By: Brandy Otero, Collier MPO Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. 2018 TDSP Annual Update (PDF)
4.D
Packet Pg. 50
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.D
Doc ID: 5792
Item Summary: Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual
Update
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
05/29/2018 1:45 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
05/29/2018 1:45 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 05/29/2018 1:45 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 05/29/2018 1:54 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
4.D
Packet Pg. 51
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1 - Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1
Section 2 – Mandatory TDSP Requirements ................................................................................................................. 3
Section 3 –Service Plan Update ................................................................................................................................... 22
Section 4 – Updated Tables and Statistics ................................................................................................................... 25
Section 5 – Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................ 32
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
iii
List of Tables
Table 1: Implementation Schedule/TD Capital Improvements Program 11
Table 2: Implementation Plan 14
Table 3: CTD Calculated Rate - FY2017/2018 CTD Rate Model 17
Table 4: Current Collier County Adopted Fare Structure 18
Table 5: Collier Area Paratransit Fare Structures 18
Table 6: Proposed Fixed Route Fare Changes 20
Table 7: Population and Population Density 26
Table 8: Population Age Distribution 26
Table 9: Annual Household Income Distribution 27
Table 10: Employment Characteristics 28
Table 11: Vehicle Availability Distribution 28
Table 12: Travel to Work - Commute Times 28
Table 13: Mode of Travel to Work 29
Table 14: Names and Locations of Local Universities 30
Table 15: Educational Attainment 30
Table 16:TD Population Forecast 31
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
4.D.1Packet Pg. 55Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
v
LCB ROLL CALL VOTE
for Approval of Collier County’s
Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Update
May 23, 2018
Name
Representing
Yes
No
Absent
Commissioner Donna Fiala Chairwoman X
Harold Kurzman Elderly X
VACANT Citizen Advocate /Non User
Dylan Vogel Citizen Advocate/User X
Emely Kafle Children at Risk X
Pa Houa Lee-Yang Community Action (economically
disadvantaged) X
David Ogilvie Public Education X
Steve Felter Florida Dept. of Transportation X
Felix Soto Florida Dept. of Children and
Families X
Rebecca MacKenzie Area Agency on Aging SWFL X
Robert Richards Florida Dept. of Education -Division
of Vocational Rehabilitation Services X
Maribel Perez Agency for Health Care
Administration X
Susan Corris Southwest Florida Regional
Workforce Development Board X
Irene Johnson Veteran Services X
VACANT Local Medical Community
N/A Local Mass Transit
Sherry Brenner Citizens with Disabilities X
VACANT Private Transportation Industry
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
1
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 427 of the Florida Statutes establishes the Florida Commission for the
Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD) and directs the CTD to “accomplish the coordination
of transportation services provided to the transportation disadvantaged.” In
accomplishing this purpose, the CTD approves a Community Transportation Coordinator
(CTC) for five years for each county of the state which is charged with arranging cost-
effective, efficient, unduplicated services within its respectful service area. The Collier
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is approved by the CTD, charged with creating
the Local Coordinating Board (LCB) and providing technical assistance to the LCB. The
LCB acts as an advisory board and such provides guidance, monitors, evaluates and
supports the transportation activities of the CTC.
The Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) is an annually updated tactical
plan developed by the CTC and the MPO under the guidance and approval of the LCB in
accordance with the requirements set out in Rule 4102, F.A.C. Chapter 427, F.S.,
requires each County to develop a Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP)
for the Transportation Disadvantaged program, with a Major Update every five years, at
a minimum. This 2018 Minor Update is outlined to meet the requirements established by
the State of Florida that require each county to develop a TDSP. The 1979 Florida
Legislature passed the Transportation Services Act, Chapter 427, Florida Statutes (F.S.),
which called for the coordination at the County level of all Federal and State expenditures
for the "transportation disadvantaged."
The CTD Guidelines for TDSP Amendments and Updates mandates that only the
following components of the Plan are updated annually:
1) Previous TDSP Review Letter
2) Needs Assessment
3) Goals, Objectives and Strategies
a) Ensure that objectives indicate an implementation date/accomplishment date.
b) Note deficiencies & corrective actions.
c) Note service improvements or expansions.
d) Section should be logical and mirror the format from the previous year.
4) Implementation Plan
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
2
a) Transportation Disadvantaged Improvement Plan (TDIP) should cite progress,
setbacks, adherence to schedules.
b) Implementation schedule revisions as necessary.
5) Cost / Revenue Allocation and Rate Structure Justification
a) Review current and updated projected expenses, revenues and levels of
service and make adjustments accordingly. A new Service Rates Summary
page as well as Rate Model Worksheets must be submitted.
The CTD Guidelines for TDSP Amendments and Updates also provide an option for the
update of the following components of the Plan:
1) DEVELOPMENT PLAN
a) Organization Chart updated as necessary.
b) LCB certification page (members, agencies, alternates and term) to include any
changes as previously submitted in TDSP or updates.
c) Any significant changes to major trip generators/attractors that have
significantly altered service delivery.
2) SERVICE PLAN
a) Changes in types or hours of service
b) Significant changes in system policies (priorities, eligibility criteria, etc.)
c) New service innovations or cancellation of services
d) Changes in operators/coordination contractors
e) Changes in vehicle inventory
f) System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) certification if expired and renewed.
g) Include new acceptable alternatives
h) Changes in narrative for adoption of new service standards
i) Changes to the Grievance and Evaluation process
3) QUALITY ASSURANCE
The TDSP is used by the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) and the LCB to
maintain and/or improve transportation services for the transportation disadvantaged and
to serve as a framework for performance evaluation.
For the purposes of this minor update, the mandatory components will be updated. No
additional optional updates are included in this document.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
3
SECTION 2
MANDATORY TDSP REQUIREMENTS
As previously noted, CTD Guidelines for Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan
(TDSP) Amendments and Updates require certain elements be updated annually. This
section of the document will address those mandated components and provide applicable
updated information.
1. Previous TDSP Review Letter
The CTD Guidelines require that all items cited as deficient or inadequate and needing
follow-up as part of the prior TDSP Review should be addressed in the update. To date,
there were no TDSP reviews that indicate deficiencies.
Needs Assessment
The purpose of this section is to assess the transportation needs and demands for
individuals with disabilities, elderly, low income and high risk and at risk children. This
section attempts to identify any gaps in transportation services that are needed in the
service area. The section also provides a quantitative transportation needs profile for the
applicable TD populations and indicates unmet need for transportation in the Collier
County service area.
The Collier County TD population is discussed in Section 3 (Updated Tables and
Statistics) of this document. In 2014, Collier County had a large senior citizen population,
with 28.1% of the population aged 65 or older. This is higher than the state average of
18.2%. These conditions are key indicators of transit/paratransit use, as are automobile
availability, income, traffic, urban growth and land use/site planning. All of these factors
contribute to the need for public transit in Collier County.
In 2013, CUTR released the Paratransit Service Demand Estimation Tool that replaced
the 1993 methodology used to forecast paratransit demand. While the TDSP guidance
handbook has not been updated, the new tool was used for the development of TD
population forecasts in the 2014 TDSP Major Update adopted by the LCB on October 25,
2013. The data prepared in the TDSP Major Update indicates that the Collier County
forecast of TD population in 2017 is 150,343. This includes all disabled, elderly and low-
income persons and children who are “high-risk” or “at-risk”. These population groups
are further refined to identify the “Critical Need TD” population. This population includes
individuals who, due to severe physical limitations or low incomes, are unable to transport
themselves or purchase transportation, and are dependent upon others to obtain access
to health care, employment, education, shopping, social activities, or other life sustaining
activities. The Critical Need TD Population for 2017 is forecasted to be 14,835.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
4
Barriers to Coordination
In Collier County and across the State of Florida, there is more demand for TD services
than supply. Even though financing for TD services has seen modest increases over
time, rising fuel costs, inflation, and a rapidly-increasing population all contribute to less
money being available and having transport more people.
Some social service agencies have had their transportation funding reduced. This trend
adds to the burden on the TD program due to the shift of individual trips from a
“sponsored” to non-sponsored trip status. If this practice occurs, other agencies may
either reduce their transportation budgets or eliminate sponsoring trips, potentially
impacting the TD program.
Other barriers to TD coordination include:
Collier County is the single largest county in Florida in terms of land area (2,026
square miles). The TD population is spread throughout the county, creating the
potential for long distance trips, which, in turn increases the cost per trip per
passenger.
Funding for transportation services has remained relatively constant over the past
several years, but has not kept up with the increasing travel demands. As a result,
Collier County is struggling to maintain existing service levels and does not have
the financial resources to pursue new or expanded service.
The unavailability of adequate pedestrian access / sidewalks to CAT bus stops
limits the ability of some TD passengers to safely access the fixed route system.
2. Goals and Objectives
A review of the 2014 TDSP Major Update’s goals and objectives was conducted and no
changes are recommended at this time. They are included in this report for ease of
reference and are as follows:
The mission of the Collier County Local Coordinating Board is:
To carry out a coordinated and comprehensive approach to planning,
developing, and providing transportation services that meet the needs of
transportation disadvantaged persons.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
5
CAT’s mission is:
Collier Area Transit is committed to providing safe, accessible, and
courteous public transportation services to our customers.
Collier Area Paratransit’s mission is:
Identify and safely meet the transportation needs of Collier County, through a
courteous, dependable, cost effective and environmentally sound team
commitment.
The following goals and objectives have been adopted to further the missions
above.
GOAL 1: Implement a fully coordinated transportation system.
Objective 1.1
Maximize coordination with public, private, and human service agencies, and other
transportation operators.
Objective 1.2
Coordinate efforts with Collier Area Transit.
Objective 1.3
Communicate and coordinate with other counties to promote ride-sharing practices
and transportation arrangements.
GOAL 2: Provide an efficient and effective coordinated transportation service.
Objective 2.1
Increase effective use of transportation services.
Objective 2.2
Consistently provide on-time service.
Objective 2.3
Track and improve call-hold time.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
6
Objective 2.4
Maximize effective transfer of individuals to the fixed-route system.
Objective 2.5
Increase fixed route utilization.
Objective 2.6
Continue to review ridership trends and origin/destination data to determine if fixed
routes should be reviewed for service expansions or realignment to allow greater use
by current paratransit riders.
Objective 2.7
Increase the number of passenger trips per vehicle hour.
Objective 2.8
Continue to monitor private provider utilization rates and adjust as needed to provide
timely, effective service.
Objective 2.9
Trend downward the cost per passenger trip.
Objective 2.10
Trend downward the cost per vehicle hour.
Objective 2.11
Maintain an optimal vehicle replacement program for paratransit vehicles and
equipment.
Objective 2.12
Acquire new and upgraded paratransit vehicles and equipment, as funding permits.
Objective 2.13
Continually measure and analyze performance standards, as a basis for evaluating
quality assurance.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
7
GOAL 3: Educate and market paratransit services to current riders, the general
public, agency sponsored clients, visitors, and other potential customers.
Objective 3.1
Maximize the accessibility of service information including alternative delivery formats
such as Braille, auditory enhanced and alternative languages.
Objective 3.2
Utilize the electronic dissemination of marketing and education materials, including,
but not limited to the internet, e-mails, listservs, websites, etc.
Objective 3.3
Ensure that all websites and other electronic media are compliant with Section 508 of
the Rehabilitation Act, as amended in 1998. (Under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act, 29 U.S.C. 794d, agencies must give persons with disabilities, employees and
members of the public access to information that is comparable to the access
available to others. This includes access to electronic and information technology
applications).
Objective 3.4
Provide a “Rider’s Guide” to paratransit patrons covering the paratransit services
offered (ADA, TD). Produce the guide in alternative formats and alternative languages
including Creole or others that may be necessary.
GOAL 4: Operate a safe transportation system.
Objective 4.1
Ensure that services are provided in a safe and secure manner in accordance with the
CTD and FDOT standards and recommendations.
Objective 4.2
Ensure consistency and compliance with Chapter 14-90, Florida Administrative Code,
Equipment and Operational Safety Standards for Bus Transit Systems.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
8
Objective 4.3
Ensure consistency and compliance with the 49 CFR Part 655, Federal Transit
Administration Prevention of Alcohol Misuse and Prohibited Drug use in Transit
Operations including the adopted Substance Abuse Policy and policy statements.
Objective 4.4
Ensure consistency and compliance to 49 CFR Part 40, Procedures for
Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs.
Objective 4.5
Ensure consistency and compliance or FTA covered contractors to 49 CFR Part 655,
Federal Transit Administration Prevention of Alcohol Misuse and Prohibited Drug Use
in Transit Operations.
Objective 4.6
Ensure consistency and compliance with any local drug and alcohol service
standards.
Objective 4.7
Ensure consistency and compliance with the annually updated System Safety
Program Plan and Security Program Plan.
Objective 4.8
Ensure consistency and compliance of an accident/incident procedure as part of the
bus system safety program.
Objective 4.9
Continually review accident/incident data to identify trends that may need to be
addressed through training or procedural changes.
Objective 4.10
Review Operator training program to ensure inclusion of consistent boarding
techniques for passengers.
Objective 4.11
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
9
Ensure that new bus stops are readily accessible to persons with disabilities and meet
ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) compliance requirements.
Objective 4.12
Ensure that existing bus stops are inventoried for their accessibility and the availability
of sidewalks as outlined in the Collier County ADA Transition Plan. Ensure that
existing bus stops are renovated to be consistent with Collier County’s ADA Transition
Plan. Establish a retrofit plan for those stops that do not have accessible shelters
and/or sidewalks.
GOAL 5: Provide quality transportation services.
Objective 5.1
Maintain the accountability of transportation service providers through the CTC
Quarterly Reports.
Objective 5.2
Continue to review ridership trends and origin/destination data to determine if fixed
routes should be reviewed for service expansions or realignment to allow greater use
by current paratransit riders.
Objective 5.3
Conduct continuing surveys of passengers to ensure that quality services are being
provided.
Objective 5.4
Conduct immediate follow-up on any complaint or concern brought forward.
GOAL 6: Secure funding necessary to meet above stated goals.
Objective 6.1
Explore any and all sources of funding to meet future goals of provision of service.
Objective 6.2
Maximize efficiency of utilization of all current state, federal and local resources.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
10
Objective 6.3
Coordinate with all public, quasi-public, and non-profit entities in order to maximize all
potential funding opportunities for public transportation services in Collier and Lee
counties.
Objective 6.4
Identify and pursue opportunities for establishing and coordinating privately-
sponsored public transportation services in meeting local transit needs.
3. Implementation Plan
CTD Guidelines require that the three-year Transportation Disadvantaged Improvement
Plan (TDIP) should cite progress, setbacks, and adherence to schedules noted in the
prior year TDSP, including all necessary revisions to the Implementation schedule. Table
1 reflects the applicable updates/status of the elements in the implementation plan and
Table 2 summarizes implementation activities that have been accomplished per fiscal
year and offers an implementation schedule through FY2017/18.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
11
Table 1: Implementation Schedule/TD Capital Improvements Program
Ongoing System Improvements/Review Status Update
Increase fixed‐route utilization Nationally, ridership on Fixed Route systems
have been declining but during the last year it
has held steady on the Collier Area Transit
system. CAT will be hosting several travel
training events throughout Collier County to
encourage the use of the Public Transportation.
Continue to review ridership trends and
origin/destination data to determine if fixed routes
should be reviewed for service expansions or
realignment to allow greater use by current
paratransit patrons.
Ridership trends are reviewed monthly. Fixed
routes have been increasing expanding
accessibility to current paratransit patrons.
Continue to monitor private provider utilization rates
and adjust as needed to provide timely, effective
service
Private provider invoices are reviewed monthly
Increase the number of passenger trips per vehicle
hour
The trips per driver hour reduced from 1.74 in
2016 to 1.35 in 2017. The reduction in this
performance indicator may be due to the
increased distance traveled by TD passengers.
CAT is implementing alternative way to
reserving trips by negotiating trips the intent to
increase efficiency as well as enhanced
customer service.
Maintain the cost per passenger trip The cost per passenger trip since 2010 is as
follows:
FY 2010 $28.04 FY 2011 $31.14
FY 2012 $37.62 FY 2013 $34.95
FY 2014 $36.26 FY 2015 $39.91
FY 2016 $36.86 FY 2017 $ 40.21
Costs increases are attributed to the increased
in distance traveled for TD passengers as well as
increased ridership not trending to the degree of
the increased operations costs including but not
limited to fuel costs.
Maintain the cost per driver hour The cost per driver hour since 2010 is as follows:
FY 2010 $35.59 FY 2011 $52.49
FY 2012 $58.40 FY 2013 $54.10
FY 2014 $54.77 FY 2015 $50.62
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
12
Ongoing System Improvements/Review Status Update
FY 2016 $64.26 FY 2017 $54.13
Costs are consistent with each year Annual
Operating Report. Costs fluctuation can be
attributed to the maintenance cost, including
fluctuation in fuel.
Maintain grant application process for FTA Section
5310 funds – specifically for replacement vehicles
Ongoing, grant applications have been
submitted for replacement vehicles
Continue to coordinate with Lee County Transit and
other providers regarding the provision of intercounty
transportation services
Coordination is on‐going. The fixed route
connection called LinC began service in October
2011 as an express route.
Continue providing information to patrons regarding
cancellation/ no‐show and co‐pay policies
Ongoing
Monitor CAT’s effectiveness in enforcing cancellation/
no‐show and co‐pay policies and strengthen
enforcement where needed
Ongoing. Staff recognizes the cost implications
of no‐shows and cancellations.
Pursue alternative funding sources to provide
additional transportation services and/or capital
equipment
Numerous grants have been submitted and the
cycle for applications are being tracked. Capital
needs for CAT were included in a TIGER Grant
application that was submitted by Collier County
for the Immokalee area. The grant was awarded
and a Transfer Facility as well as 22 Bus stop
improvements will be constructed as part of this
project. Staff is exploring the possibility of
expanding the option available for advertising as
an alternate funding source to support
additional service.
Ensure that transportation services are provided in
accordance with the CTD and FDOT safety standards
and recommendations
On‐going review of transportation services and
the CTD and FDOT safety standards
Ensure that all system drivers are adequately trained
in system safety and security preparedness and
response
Ongoing
Continually review current training, available training,
mandatory annual training curriculum and
safety/security best practices
Ongoing
Conduct annual safety reviews of all contracted
operators
Ongoing
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
13
Ongoing System Improvements/Review Status Update
Ensure the drug and alcohol testing requirements are
being implemented system wide
Collier County is ensuring that drug and alcohol
testing requirements are met
Improve frequency of service and expand service
hours
Ongoing
Maximize the accountability of system transportation
service providers
Ongoing
Strictly enforce monetary penalties for failure to
provide adequate service
The vendor contracts provides
incentives/disincentives for performance
Monitor equipment and vehicles and replace as
needed
Replacement vehicle needs are being tracked.
Vehicles are being replaced as needed.
Inspect all Collier County paratransit vehicles on a
daily basis
On‐going and continuous with vehicle inspection
sheet
Explore all sources of funding to meet future service
needs
Additional funding sources are being explored,
both traditional transit funding as well as
innovative sources and one time opportunities
Develop contacts with agencies that provide or
coordinate transportation services to TD eligible
residents to determine options for future cost sharing
of trips
Continuous agency coordination is being
pursued to discuss options
Provide trips on Sundays for religious services Ongoing
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update 6/30/2018 14 Table 2: Implementation Plan Improvement Date Capital/Service Improvements Comments/ Status Potential Funding FY 2013/2014 Maintain existing service Bus Shelters / Benches Replace paratransit vehicles Routes have stayed the same due to budget considerations Grant applications have been submitted for Bus Shelters/ Benches. Bus replacements have been pursued. FTA Section 5310 ‐ Transportation for Elderly Persons and Persons with Disabilities, FTA Section 5311 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), FDOT Service Development Grants Program, and CTD Shirley Conroy Rural Capital Equipment Grant. MPO STP funds for CMS/ITS projects FY 2014/2015 Maintain existing service Bus Shelters / Benches Replace paratransit vehicles Grant applications have been submitted for Bus Shelters/Benches. Bus replacements are pursued annually. FTA Section 5310 ‐ Transportation for Elderly Persons and Persons with Disabilities, FDOT Service Development Grants Program. 4.D.1Packet Pg. 70Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update 6/30/2018 15 Improvement Date Capital/Service Improvements Comments/ Status Potential Funding FY 2015/2016 Maintain existing service Establish new service Extend service hours ‐ night service for job access on both fixed route and paratransit systems Improve frequency of service Add more frequent transit service – including weekend and personal trips that fall out of the established prioritization schedule Add Bus Shelters / Benches Replace paratransit and support vehicles and purchase new vehicles Existing service is being maintained. New service was established along Immokalee Rd. in Jan. 2016 Service hours and frequency have not been extended. Sunday paratransit service has been extended for religious organizations. No additional shelters/benches have been added Paratransit & support vehicle replacement is being maintained. 5307, 5311, local funding Service Development grant None identified 5307, Trip & Equip Grant CMS/ITS Grant 5310 FY 2016/2017 Maintain existing service Extend service hours ‐ night service for job access on both fixed route and paratransit systems Improve frequency of service Add more frequent transit service – including weekend and personal trips that fall out of the established prioritization schedule Add Bus Shelters / Benches Replace paratransit and support vehicles and purchase new vehicles Service was expanded on Immokalee Road. Previous existing service is being maintained. Service hours and frequency have not been extended Paratransit Service on Saturdays has removed any limitations on trips based trip purpose. Currently, CAT is designing 12 Bus Stop Shelters and will start the construction of 35 sites for ADA improvements. Paratransit & support vehicle replacement is being maintained. 5307, 5311, local funding None identified 5307 CMS/ITS grant and 5307 5310 4.D.1Packet Pg. 71Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update 6/30/2018 16 Improvement Date Capital/Service Improvements Comments/ Status Potential Funding FY 2017/2018 Maintain existing service Extend service hours ‐ night service for job access on both fixed route and paratransit systems Improve frequency of service Add more frequent transit service – including weekend and personal trips that fall out of the established prioritization schedule Add Bus Shelters / Benches Replace paratransit and support vehicles and purchase new vehicles fleet Existing service is being maintained. Hours have not been extended Service frequency was increased by 4 added loops which was split between Route 11 and 12 during peak hours Paratransit Service on Saturdays has removed any limitations on trips based trip purpose. Currently, CAT is constructing 10 Bus Stop Shelters and completed the construction of 35 sites for ADA improvements. 6 Sites are currently being designed for ADA improvements, shelters and Bus Pull Outs (for 2 sites). Paratransit & support vehicle replacement is being maintained. 5307, 5311, local funding None identified 5307 and Local Funds CMS/ITS grant, 5307 and FDOT 5310 4.D.1Packet Pg. 72Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
17
4. COST / REVENUE ALLOCATION AND RATE STRUCTURE JUSTIFICATION
CTD Guidelines state that TDSP Updates/Amendments should include a complete explanation for
any rate changes or new service changes. The explanation should include a discussion of the review
process as well as detail of LCB involvement and approval. A new summary rate sheet should be
presented if there are any changes.
During the review period Collier County implemented the 2017 Rate Calculation Worksheet (shown
below), which was developed using the TD Commission model used by all Florida counties. The 2016
CTD rate changes went through a public involvement process and were reviewed and approved by
the LCB prior to adoption by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC).
COST REVENUE ALLOCATION
The rate structure is based on the type of trip (i.e. ambulatory, ambulatory group, wheelchair, etc.) in
the service area.
Table 3: CTD Calculated Rates – FY 2018/2019 CTD Rate Model
Transportation Disadvantaged Trust Fund Service Rates
Effective Date: 7/1/2018
Ambulatory Trip $34.02
Wheelchair Trip $58.32
Group Trip- Individual $18.10
Group Trip - Group $51.77
Bus Pass (daily-full fare) $4.00
Bus Pass (daily-reduced fare) $2.00
Bus Pass (weekly-full fare) $15.00
Bus Pass (weekly-reduced fare) $7.50
Bus Pass (monthly-full fare) $35.00
Bus Pass (monthly-reduced fare) $17.50
Marco Express (monthly-full fare) $70.00
Marco Express (monthly-reduced fare) $35.00
Sources: Service Rates, Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged,
TD Rate Model, Adopted March 7, 2018 , Public Transit and Neighborhood
Enhancement Department, 2018.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
18
Reduced fares are for members of Medicare, Disabled community, those 65 years and older and
children 17 and under.
The fare structure for ADA, TD and Medicaid trips was discussed by the LCB on March 21, 2012.
The recommendation was to implement a uniform $1.00 fare increase for the TD fare structure. The
recommendation did not include ADA or Medicaid trips. The LCB also recommended not renewing
the Medicaid contract when it expired on June 30, 2012. The BCC approved a new fare structure
effective October 1, 2012, as indicated below:
Table 5: Collier Area Paratransit Fare Structures
Previous Fare Structure Fare Structure Approved by the
BCC effective 10/1/12
ADA fare – At or above Poverty Level $2.00 $3.00
Medicaid fare – Fee for Service $1.00 fare or copayment $1.00 fare or copayment
ADA & TD fare ‐ Under Poverty Level $0.00 $1.00
TD fare ‐ 101% to 150% of Poverty Level $2.00 $3.00
TD fare ‐ 151% to 225% of Poverty Level $3.00 $4.00
TD fare ‐ 226% to 237% of Poverty Level $4.00 $5.00
TD fare ‐ +337% of Poverty Level $6.00 $7.00
Table 4: Current Collier County Adopted Fare Structure
CAT full-fare one-way ticket $1.50
CAT full-fare one-way ticket Marco Express $2.50
CAT reduced fare one-way ticket $0.75
CAT reduced fare one-way ticket Marco Express $1.25
CAT Transfers $0.75
CAT Transfers reduced fare $0.35
CAT full-fare monthly pass $35.00
CAT full-fare monthly pass Marco Express $70.00
CAT reduced fare monthly pass $17.50
CAT reduced fare monthly pass Marco Express $35.00
CAT weekly pass - full fare $15.00
CAT weekly pass - reduced fare $7.50
CAT all day pass $4.00
CAT all day reduced pass $2.00
Resolution 2013-28 was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on February 12,
2013, which modified the fixed route fares.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
19
The Collier MPO, in coordination with PTNE, is conducting a Fare Analysis Study for the fixed route
system and the paratransit system. The public was surveyed and a public meeting was conducted
to receive input on the proposed scenarios. The study was reviewed by the Public Transit Advisory
Committee (PTAC) on January 16th, 2018 and endorsed by the PTAC on March 20th, 2018. The
Local Coordinating Board also reviewed and endorsed the study on March 7th, 2018.
The study recommendations will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners at their May
22nd meeting. The following recommendations for the fixed route and paratransit system are included
in the Fare Study:
Fixed-route:
Increase the Fixed Route fare by $0.50 ($2.00 proposed full-fare); and increase the reduced
fare by $0.25 ($1.00 proposed reduced fare); Provide a free 90-minute transfer; Reduce the
day pass to $3 as part of a consolidated package to optimize use of the day pass while
reducing possible ridership reduction associated with increasing the one-way fare;
Eliminate the existing 7-day pass and replace with a 15-day pass at 50% of the cost of the 30-
day pass. The 15-day pass would be priced at $20 ($10 for reduced fare) based on increasing
the cost of the 30-day pass to $40 as the next bullet describes;
Increase the cost of the 30-day pass from $35 to $40 ($20 for reduced fare).
Increase the cost of the Marco Express single fare from $2.50 to $3 ($1.50 for reduced fare)
to bring it more in line with the cost of the Marco Express monthly pass.
Eliminate the cost of the smartcard in conjunction with the fare increase for the 30-day pass.
Combine the cost of the smartcard and the full or reduced 30-day pass price into one fare
when a customer needs to purchase or replace a smart card. ($42 full fare or $22 reduced
fare)
Fixed Route Policy Recommendations:
Explore the potential for sale of passes at third party vendors (such as grocery and
convenience stores). This had considerable support by the public.
Explore the potential to use a phone/computer app to purchase passes/fares. This concept
was also desired by the public.
Implement a policy to include college-age students and active/retired military personnel as
eligible for reduced fare with valid ID.
Further incentivize the Business Pass Program by maintaining the currently corporate 30-day
pass rate of $29.75 if the 30-day pass fare is increased to $40.
Implement a promotional “Try Transit” day where fixed-route fares are waived on a designated
day to encourage infrequent or new riders to try CAT’s service.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
20
Table 6 : Proposed Fixed Route Fare Changes
Paratransit:
Maintain the existing ADA fare structure and consolidate the TD fare structure from five to
three income-based categories to include:
o $1 for riders at or below the poverty level
o $3 for riders 101-150% of the poverty level
o $4 for riders with income 151% or higher above the poverty.
Paratransit Policy Recommendations:
Update the definition of “household income” and required documentation as recommended in
the “Definition of Household for Low Income Fare Qualification”
Consider implementing a fare increase of up to $1 for the ADA and TD fares within the next
two years. The PTAC members did not want this to be an automatic increase without further
review and evaluation of the impacts on the users.
Any changes to fares will be reported in the next TDSP major update which will be completed by
October 2018.
Fare Category
Current Proposed
Full Fare Reduced
Fare Full Fare Reduced
Fare
One-way Fare $1.50 $0.75 $2.00 $1.00
Children 5 years of age &
under Free Free Free Free
Transfer $0.75 $0.35 Free/90
min.
Free/90
min.
Day Pass $4.00 $2.00 $3.00 $1.50
7-Day Pass $15.00 $7.50 NA NA
15-Day Pass NA NA $20.00 $10.00
30-Day Pass $35.00 $17.50 $40.00 $20.00
Marco Express One-way Fare $2.50 $1.20 $3.00 $1.50
Marco Express 30-Day Pass $70.00 $35.00 $70.00 $35.00
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
21
QUALITY ASSURANCE
In accordance with the CTD’s Guidelines the service standards established in the TDSP were
reviewed. The Medicaid Grievance Process was developed and is included here by reference.
Additionally, no changes were made to the Evaluation Process or the local Grievance Process.
CTC EVALUATION PROCESS
An annual evaluation of the Collier County CTC was not required this year. The Collier MPO
conducted the process of recommending Collier County as the CTC. The Collier County Board of
County Commissioners approved Resolution 2017-210 requesting that they be re-designated as the
CTC for Collier County. The LCB voted unanimously to recommend to the Collier MPO that the
Collier County BCC be re-designated and approved as the CTC at their December 6, 2017 meeting.
The Collier MPO Board deemed that it is in the best interest of public health, safety and welfare of
Collier County that the Collier County BCC be re-designated and approved as the CTC. The MPO
Board voted unanimously to approve Resolution 2017-08, recommending that the Collier County
BCC be re-designated and approved as the CTC. The recommendation was submitted to the CTD
and was approved at their February 13th Board meeting. The MPO will conduct an annual evaluation
of the CTC in early 2019.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
22
SECTION 3
SERVICE PLAN UPDATE
The TDSP was amended by the LCB in July 2017, and ratified by the MPO Board in October 2017
to include updated language regarding Escorts and Children and an updated definition of group trips.
The revised language is shown below:
B. Escorts and Children
If an escort/personal care attendant is requested or necessary they will be transported at no additional
charge.
Priority Trip Purpose — Categories and Definitions
1 MEDICAL -- medical, dental, or therapeutic services including hospital appointments; clinic visits;
dialysis; health department; speech, occupational, physical therapies; psychiatric, psychological services.
2
EMPLOYMENT -- work or employment training education such as Job Service and vocational technical
schools.
a. Permanent disability employment trips
b. Elderly or Low Income employment trips
3 NUTRITIONAL -- adult congregate meal programs, breakfast programs, food stamp procurement and
food shopping trips.
4
GROUP RECREATION for Disabled Passengers -- Group trips booked through a single reservation
request for non-essential, non-employment related activities such as: bowling, bingo, beach, parks,
restaurants, libraries, or theaters. A group is defined as a minimum of three (3) passengers having either
the same trip origination or destination.
5
SOCIAL for agency-related activity -- Support services such as those through Department of Children
and Families, Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, mental health centers, churches, senior citizen
programs. This includes civic responsibilities (governmental services, voting), but excludes nutritional
programs.
6
GROUP RECREATION for elderly or low-income passengers -- Group trips booked through a single
reservation request for non-essential, non-employment related activities such as: bowling, bingo, beach,
parks, restaurants, libraries, theaters. A group is defined as a minimum of three (3) passengers having
either the same trip origination or destination.
7
PERSONAL BUSINESS -- non-agency activities essential to maintenance of independence including
banking, shopping, legal appointments, religious activities, etc.
a. Disabled, elderly or low income
b. Trips for persons with a self-created transportation hardship
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
23
12. Service Standards
In order to assess quality assurance for the delivery of transportation services, it is necessary to have
established service standards and policies. The Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged
and FTA have several requirements of its transportation providers, which forms basis for the following
standards and policies. These service standards and policies are the basis for the annual review of
the Community Transportation Coordinator by the Local Coordinating Board.
The Program provided to users of the system will be based on the following eligibility criteria.
Eligibility
Individuals who are interested in using the CAP services must apply through a written application process.
The eligibility process can take up to twenty-one (21) calendar days to complete. A functional
assessment/interview may be required as part of the eligibility process. After qualifying for service, all
approved individuals are subject to recertification every three years or if there is a change in address or
health condition, whichever is sooner. To receive an application please visit our website at
www.colliertransit.com, visit or call the center. CAP is intended to serve a limited group of people,
specifically those who have no other means of transportation and qualify under the following sponsored
programs:
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Individuals whose physical or mental impairment prevent use
of the CAT bus service (fixed route). In addition, the individual’s origin and destination must be within the
ADA corridor, which is defined as a service corridor that extends three-quarters (¾) of a mile on either
side of CAT bus service (fixed route).
Visitors who are unable to utilize CAT bus service (fixed route) may be eligible to utilize paratransit
services. Visitors will be required to provide proof of their visitor status, proof of their disability if it is not
apparent, and certify that they are unable to use fixed route service. For more information please contact
our Customer Service Department at 239-252-7272. For service beyond the 21 days, an application will
be required.
Transportation Disadvantaged (TD): Individuals who because of a mental or physical disability, income
status, or age are unable to transport themselves or to purchase transportation and are, therefore,
dependent upon others to obtain access to healthcare, employment, education, shopping, social activities,
or other life-sustaining activities, or children who are handicapped, or high risk or at risk (as defined in §
411.202). In addition, the individual’s trip origin and/or destination must reside outside the ADA corridor.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
24
Agencies: Individuals whose trips are funded under a negotiated agency contract.
The standards listed below are those that are required by Section 41-2.006, Florida Administrative
Code and the Code of Federal Regulations.
U. Pick-Up Window
Passengers are not given a set pick-up time. Instead, they are told to be ready for their ride to arrive from
between one to two hours before their appointment time. This window is dependent on the service area of the
pick-up and drop-off points. The service areas are defined as the Naples Service Area, Golden Gate Estates
Service Area, Marco Island Service Area and Immokalee Service Area. Trips within one service area have a
one hour window. Trips between service areas have a two-hour window. The one to two hour windows are
inclusive of travel time between pick-up and drop-off. The CTC may negotiate special pick-up arrangements
with the customer, in advance, as the situation dictates. These arrangements shall be documented and
maintained on file to distinguish these trips from regularly scheduled trips for determining on-time performance.
Medical appointments and employment must follow the “30 minutes early to zero minutes late” policy.
A Group Trip per passenger is defined as a trip where three or more eligible Transportation Disadvantaged
customers on one vehicle being picked up at multiple origins and traveling to one single destination or being
picked up from one single origin and traveling to multiple destinations. A Group Trip per Group is defined as
a trip where three or more eligible Transportation Disadvantaged customers on one vehicle being picked up
from a single origin and traveling to a single destination. The CTC may negotiate special arrangements with
the customer or agency, in advance, for a group trip. These special arrangements will be documented and
evaluated separately for on-time performance. Every effort will be made by the CTC to keep the ride times
within the service window for these trips.
All return trips are also scheduled in advance. The pick-up process for return trips is the same as the
originating trip. Depending on the location, the window may be one or two hours. General expectations are
that travel within a single service area will be within the one hour window and trips between service areas will
have a two-hour window.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
25
SECTION 4
UPDATED TABLES AND STATISTICS
A number of the tables in the TDSP have been updated in an effort to evaluate the system progress.
A summary of the findings is provided when there is a significant change in the activity.
SERVICE AREA PROFILES AND DEMOGRAPHICS
An Overview of Collier County
Collier County, located on Florida’s west coast, occupies a land area of 2,026 square miles, making
it the largest county in Florida. Broward and Dade counties are located on Collier’s eastern border,
Lee and Hendry counties are on the northern border, and Monroe County is on the southern border.
The county contains three incorporated areas: Naples, Everglades City, and Marco Island. Collier
County includes the Bonita Springs-Naples urbanized area, as designated by the Year 2000 Census.
Collier County has nearly 50 miles of public beaches, along with a number of local, state, and national
nature preserves. It was established in 1923. Its early economic growth has been associated with a
millionaire from Memphis, Barron Gift Collier, who acquired his fortune through streetcar advertising.
When Collier came to the area, he introduced paved roads, electric power, telegraphs and many new
businesses to the people of the area. These additions attracted many people to the area. In 1950,
the number of residents in Collier County was 6,488. By 1980, the County’s population had grown to
85,000, in 2000, the population was 251,377 and in 2011 the population was estimated to be 321,520.
Collier County Demographics
According to the U.S. Census, the most populous city in the county is Naples with an estimated 2016
population of 20,980. The City of Marco Island is the second largest in Collier County, with an
estimated population of 17,361. The population of the county’s unincorporated area is quite large as
compared to the cities, with about 297,012 residents. During the time period of 2000 to 2015, Collier
County saw its population increase from 251,377 to 341,091, approximately a 36% increase.
It should be noted that the following population data and demographic and socioeconomic analysis
is based on 2012 - 2016 U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) data, which is the
most recent source of census data available.
Table 7 displays population, population growth, and population density for Collier County and Florida
as a whole. From 1990 to 2016, Collier County grew at a rate much higher than that of the State of
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
26
Florida. Collier County population grew at over 25 percent, while the state population grew at over
19 percent. The population density that exists in Collier County, however, is much less than the
overall population density for the state, with 172 persons per square mile versus 370 persons per
square mile. This is due to the vast amount of land that is in a natural state or environmentally
protected by the federal or state government.
Table 7: Population and Population Density
Area Population
(1990)
Population
(2000)
Population
(2016)
Population
Growth
(2000-15)
Land Area
(Sq. Miles)
Density (2015)
(persons per
square mile)
Collier 152,099 251,377 348,236 38.53% 2,025.34 172
Florida 12,938,071 15,982,378 19,934,451 24.73% 53,926.82 370
Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 Population Data
Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR, University of Florida, Florida Population by county and Municipality, April
1, 2009, (Release Date: November 2009)
2016 U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5 year estimates
Population Age Characteristics
Table 8 charts the age group percentages for both Florida and Collier County. According to American
Community Survey (ACS) estimates provided by the U.S. Census, 29.5% of Collier County’s
population is 65 years of age or older. This is almost 10% higher than the state of Florida. The 85
and over age category comprises the smallest portion of the population in Collier County and the
State of Florida, with approximately 3.7% of the population in Collier County and 2.6% in Florida. The
0-19, 20-34, and 35-54 age cohorts are all somewhat less than those for the State of Florida.
Table 8
Population Age Distribution, 2016
Age Cohorts
Area 0-19 20-34 35-54 55-64 65 +
Collier County 20.2% 14.7% 22.4% 13.1% 29.5%
Florida 22.7% 19.2% 26.0% 12.9% 19.1%
Source: 2016 U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5 year estimates
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
27
Income Characteristics
Table 9 compares the distribution of household income in Florida and Collier County. The percent of
households with incomes in the categories under $25,000 is lower than the percentage for the State
of Florida. On the other hand, Collier County is higher than the State of Florida in the category over
$75,000. According to 2016 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, the median household
income for the State of Florida is $48,900. Collier County has a significantly higher median household
income of $59,783.
It is important to note that while the county as a whole is predominantly more affluent than that for
the State of Florida, there are anomalies that exist. The Immokalee area falls within a statewide area
of critical economic concern and has been designated as a “rural enterprise zone” with higher than
average unemployment, children living in poverty, and families who fall under the federal poverty
thresholds. Transportation to employment, job training, and critical health and social services
available in the western portions of the county must continue to be available to residents of
Immokalee area.
Table 9
Annual Household Income Distribution, 2016
Area Annual Household Income
$0 - $9,999 $10,000 - $24,999 $25,000 - $34,999 $35,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 Over $75,000
Pop % Pop % Pop % Pop % Pop % Pop %
Collier 6,535 4.9% 16,506 12.4% 13,815 10.4% 18,073 13.6% 25,041 18.8% 53,361 48.0%
Florida 556,637 7.5% 1,267,971 17.2% 838,036 11.3% 1,102,789 14.9% 1,350,797 18.3% 2,277,089 30.9%
Source: 2016 U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5 year estimates
Employment Characteristics
Table 10 compares the Collier County labor force employment characteristics to the State of Florida
employment characteristics. As of December 2016, approximately 4.5% of the Collier County labor
force was unemployed, with the labor force defined as persons 16 years of age and older. This is
slightly lower than the Florida labor force unemployment rate of 5.2%.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
28
Table 10
Employment Characteristics for Collier County, 2016
Area Percentage of Labor Force Unemployed
Collier 3.5%
Florida 3.9%
Source: Bureau of Labor and Employment Statistics, US Department of Labor, Employment
Figures Released December 2017
.
Vehicle Availability
Table 11 shows the number and percentage of households who have access to a vehicle. Collier
County’s ratio is very similar to that of the State of Florida.
Table 11
Vehicle Availability Distribution, 2016
Household Vehicle Availability
Area None % of Total One or More % of Total
Collier 7,220 5.42% 126,211 94.58%
Florida 511,316 6.92% 6,881,946 93.08%
Source: 2016 U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5 year estimates
Travel to Work
Table 12 compares the distribution of travel time to work for Collier County and Florida.
Approximately 67% of Collier County residents have a commute of less than 30 minutes, while
approximately 60% of Florida residents have a commute of less than 30 minutes.
Table 12
Travel to Work – Commute Times
Area Less than
10 min 10-19 min 20-29 min 30-44 min 45-59 min 60 + min
Collier 12.3% 31.8% 22.6% 21.3% 6.5% 5.5%
Florida 9.3% 27.8% 23.0% 23.9% 8.6% 7.5%
Source: 2016 U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5 year estimates
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
29
Mode of Travel to Work
Table 13 shows the distribution of workers’ mode of transportation to work in Collier County and
Florida. Collier County has a slightly lower percentage of drive alone travel, and a higher rate of
carpool/vanpool travel when compared to statewide results. Public transportation use in Collier
County is slightly higher than that of the State of Florida, with 2.6% of workers using it to travel to
work at the county level and approximately 2.1% usage statewide. Collier County has a higher
percentage of employees who work at home when compared to the statewide results.
Table 13
Mode of Travel to Work Distribution
Area Drive Alone Carpool or
Vanpool
Public
Transportation Walk Other
Means
Work at
Home
Collier 104,891 16,103 3,822 2,125 4,173 10,383
Collier (%) 74.1% 11.4% 2.7% 1.5% 2.9% 7.3%
Florida 6,874,620 806,897 182,328 127,822 191,437 466,696
Florida (%) 79.5% 9.3% 2.1% 1.5% 2.2% 5.4%
Source: 2016 U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5 year estimates
(1) Housing Classifications and Patterns
As the previous tables have indicated, most households in Collier County have access to at least one
vehicle. There are three main locations where zero car households are most prevalent: in Immokalee,
as well as in areas near Collier Boulevard/SR 951 and US 41, and along Goodlette Frank Road until
just north of Immokalee Road. Smaller concentrations of zero car households may be found near
Naples Manor and Lely Resort, near US 41 and Davis Boulevard and near Davis Boulevard and
Santa Barbara Boulevard. These areas are also locations of more rental and workforce housing.
Educational Profiles
A number of colleges and universities are located within Collier County and in neighboring
communities and are listed in Table 14.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
30
Table 14
Names and Locations of Local Universities
Institution Name Location
Ave Maria University Ave Maria
Barry University Ft. Myers
Florida Gulf Coast University Ft. Myers
Florida SouthWestern State College Naples/Ft. Myers
Hodges University Naples
Nova Southeastern University Bonita Springs
In addition to these colleges and universities, the County is also home to a number of technical
institutes and training programs. Adult and workforce education is provided through Collier County
Public Schools and includes the secondary technical training schools of Lorenzo Walker Institute of
Technology (LWIT) and Bethune Education Center (BEC). In addition, Immokalee Technical Institute
(iTECH) is a technical training center focusing on technical education programs for high school
students and adults. The center also offers Adult Basic Education (ABE), General Education
Development (GED), and adult literacy programs.
Table 15 depicts the educational attainment for Collier County compared to the State of Florida. More
residents of Collier County have received a Graduate or Professional School degree than those of
the State of Florida as a whole; however most of the other categories have very similar data.
Table 15
Educational Attainment
Collier County Florida
Less Than High School 14.3% 12.8%
High School or Equivalent 26.2% 29.2%
Some College but no Degree 17.9% 20.6%
Associate Degree 7.7% 9.6%
Bachelor’s Degree 19.8% 17.8%
Graduate or Professional School
Degree 14.1% 10.0%
Source: 2016 U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5 year estimates (Population 25
years and over)
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
31
TD Population Forecasts
The Paratransit Service Demand Estimation Tool serves as an aid in the development of TD
population and travel demand estimates. This tool was used in the 2014 TDSP Major Update,
adopted by the LCB on October 25, 2013. The tool defines two categories of TD population in the
State of Florida. The first category is the “General TD” population. This includes all disabled, elderly
and low-income persons and children who are “high-risk” or “at-risk”. These population groups are
further refined to identify the “Critical Need TD” population. This population includes individuals who,
due to severe physical limitations or low incomes, are unable to transport themselves or purchase
transportation, and are dependent upon others to obtain access to health care, employment,
education, shopping, social activities, or other life sustaining activities. Table 16 displays the
population forecast for Collier County and the General TD Population versus the Critical Need TD
Population.
Table 16: TD Population Forecast
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Total Population 351,254 358,627 366,156 373,842 381,690 389,702
General TD Population 147,102 150,190 153,343 156,562 159,848 163,204
Critical Need TD Population 14,231 14,530 14,835 15,146 15,464 15,789
Source: TD Population Forecast is from the 2014 TDSP Major Update adopted on October 25, 2013. The data
and the methodology are consistent with the Instruction Manual for the TDSP from the CTD and based on 2010
U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 1 year estimate and 2013 CUTR Forecasting Paratransit
Services Demand Tool and Methodology.
According to the table, the General TD Population will make up 41.9% of Collier County’s total population.
The Critical Need TD Population is 4.0% of the total population and 9.7% of the General TD Population. The
percentages established in the 2014 TDSP Major Update were used to forecast the populations through 2020.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
2018 Collier County TDSP Annual Update
6/30/2018
32
SECTION 5
CONCLUSIONS
The large geographical size of the County in the terms of land area (2,026 square miles) causes the
TD population to be spread throughout the county, creating the potential for longer trips. The large
land area presents a challenge in meeting on time performance and other local standards.
The CTC recently went to an operations model that utilized one vendor for operations and another
vendor for administration (scheduling, dispatch). The CTC has been monitoring operations and
inefficiencies have been identified. The CTC has been working with the two vendors to improve
operations and increase efficiencies. The CTC found deficiencies in having two vendors for a system
of CAT’s size and it was determined that a single vendor model historically worked better for this area
and would work more efficiently. The CTC is developing a procurement package and expects to
award a new contract before the end of 2018. In addition, the CTC should continue to request
information from coordination contracts that is sufficient for evaluating cost effectiveness. This
information should be reported to the LCB annually.
The paratransit system is an essential service that continues to provide mobility options to the
customers of Collier County. The CTC should continue to monitor vendor operations and ensure that
the vendors are providing the required services in accordance with local developed standards in
addition to those that are required by Section 41-2.006, Florida Administrative Code. The CTC should
continue to provide information to the Local Coordinating Board regarding performance reports and
summaries of customer surveys.
The conclusions and recommendations of this report are intended to improvement the system as it
continues to grow, mature and move forward.
4.D.1
Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: 2018 TDSP Annual Update (5792 : Ratification of the 2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Annual Update)
06/08/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Appointment of a new Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) member
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to appoint one new BPAC member.
CONSIDERATIONS: Per BPAC bylaws, committee vacancies are filled by the MPO Board. All seats
on the BPAC on at-large seats. Currently there is one vacancy.
The MPO has received an application for this vacancy from Mr. Anthony Matonti. Mr. Matonti is an
urban planner with previous work experience with local and state government agencies in Florida.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Per BPAC bylaws this item was not brought to the BPAC.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board appoint Mr. Matonti to fill a current vacancy on the
BPAC.
Prepared By: Eric Ortman, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Anthony Matonti BPAC Application (PDF)
4.E
Packet Pg. 89
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.E
Doc ID: 5793
Item Summary: Appointment of a new Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC)
member
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
05/29/2018 1:52 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
05/29/2018 1:52 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 05/29/2018 1:52 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 05/29/2018 1:55 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
4.E
Packet Pg. 90
2018 COLLIER COUNTY MPO
(METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION)
ADVISORY COMMITTEE/BOARD APPl,ICATION
Return
Application
to:
Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization
2885 South Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
Phone: (239) 252-5884
Email:
Name: MATONTI ANTHONY
Last First
Address: 1057 2ND AVENUE NORTH. UNIT 14
City: NAPLES
Home Telephone: 954-288-7083
Email Address: AVMATONTl@GMAIL.COM
VINCENT
Middle
Zip Code: 34102------------Contact Time: 8-5 -----------
Referred By: ANNE MCLAUGHLIN Date Available: MAY 29. 2018----------] am applying for: BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Please note: Year-round residents are eligible to apply. Your application will remain
active in the MPO ·s Office for one (I) year. The application must be complete in order
to be considered. Read "Important Information" section on the second page of' the
application, then sign and date the application. (Use additional pages as needed.)
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY
Date: MAY 22. 2018
Tribal Affiliation:
Commission District #IC ity __ 1/..,<./ __ Al--'-Jq f'---h_1_· ___ _
----------------------If you are a member of, or officially represent a nonprofit or public agency. identify here.
and provide link to website:
Please list any Advisory Committees or Boards on which you currently serve:
I.-------------
2.-------------
3.-------------4. -------------
Have you previously served on an MPO advisory committee or board? Please
specify committee/board and dates served:
Technical Advisory Committee -Forward Pinellas (Pinellas MPO), Sarasota/Manatee MPO, Hillsborough MPO
Served October 2015 -October 2017
Occupation & Employer (if retired, please indicate):
Self Employed -Urban Seed, LLC
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Anthony Matonti BPAC Application (5793 : Appointment of a new Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) member)
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Anthony Matonti BPAC Application (5793 : Appointment of a new Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) member)
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Anthony Matonti BPAC Application (5793 : Appointment of a new Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) member)
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Anthony Matonti BPAC Application (5793 : Appointment of a new Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) member)
4.E.1
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Anthony Matonti BPAC Application (5793 : Appointment of a new Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) member)
06/08/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Appointment of a new CAC member
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to appoint one new CAC member.
CONSIDERATIONS: Per CAC bylaws, committee vacancies are filled by the MPO Board. Currently,
there are 2 CAC vacancies for representatives from the City of Naples. Councilwoman Penniman has
nominated Ms. Susan Jones to fill one of the vacancies. The Naples City Council will decide on the
nomination of Ms. Jones at their June 6th meeting which is after the MPO Board packets have been
prepared.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A (Per CAC bylaws this item was not brought to the
CAC.)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Pending approval by the Naples City Council, that the Board appoint
Ms. Jones to fill one of 2 current CAC vacancies.
Prepared By: Eric Ortman, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Susan Jones CAC Application (PDF)
4.F
Packet Pg. 96
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 4.F
Doc ID: 5826
Item Summary: Appointment of a new CAC member
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
05/31/2018 2:42 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
05/31/2018 2:42 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 05/31/2018 2:42 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 05/31/2018 3:24 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
4.F
Packet Pg. 97
City Of Naples Submit Date: May 13, 2018
Profile
Susan Jones
sggcci 08@gmail.com
Email Address
2590 Half Moon Walk
street Address Suite or Apt
Naples
City
34102_
Postal Code
Mobile: (239) 293-2487
Primary Phone
Home: (239) 643-6559
Alternate Phone
Employer
Employer's Address
Which Boards would you like to apply for?
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) (City/County): Submitted
Member Category (if applicable)
What other volunteer positions are you interested in?
What district do you live in?
I? City Resident
20^+ years
How long have you held your current residency status?
Susan Jones Page 1 of 3
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Susan Jones CAC Application (5826 : Appointment of a new CAC member)
Do you now hold public office?
O Yes <• No
If yes, what is the office?
Are you a registered voter of Collier County?
Yes o No
Are you employed by the City of Naples or any other governmental body?
r Yes Ct No
Are you related to anyone employed by the City of Naples?
c Yes cr No
Please list any City of Naples boards or committees on which you have previously served:
Please Indicate any City of Naples board or committee on which you currently serve:
Do you serve on a board or committee of Collier County or other government?
C Yes f? No
If so, what Is that board or committee?
Interests & Experiences
Susan Jones Page 2 of 3
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Susan Jones CAC Application (5826 : Appointment of a new CAC member)
Please list your community activities (civic clubs, neighborhood associations, etc.)
Retired C.P.A., previous President and Board member of HOA, current Board member and Treasurer of
Tine Forum Club of S.W. Florida
Please attach your resume.
Please provide the name and address of a local individual who can confirm your background
and experience.
Ms. Linda Penniman, 300 Park Shore Drive, 6 A, Naples, FL 34103
Susan Jones Page 3 of 3
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Susan Jones CAC Application (5826 : Appointment of a new CAC member)
Susan S. Jones
2590 Half Moon Walk
Naples, FL 34102
(239) 293-2487
Sggccl08@gmail.com
Ms. Jones has lived in Naples for about 20 years. She was bom in Wisconsin and grew up in Kansas
and Virginia. She has a B. A. in Environmental Science from the University of Virginia and a
Masters in Taxation from Virginia Commonwealth University.
She is a retired C.P.A. and worked for many years as a tax consultant. She was director of state and
local taxation for PepsiCo and vice president of DuCharme, MeMillen & Assoc., a tax consulting
firm. After retiring she devoted her time to raising her daughter, volunteering at the Community
School of Naples and working in the family Real Estate business. She has also served on the board
of the Immokalee Foundation, and served as treasurer and board member of Youth Haven. She has
been involved with many fundraisers including the Conservancy of SW Florida, and the Shelter for
Abused Women and Children Mending Broken Hearts. She is a member of Greater Naples
Leadership (Class XIII) where she served as program chair for the Masters Class, Community
Service Chair, and Peer Advisor Chair. Susan also served on the Homeowner's Board for her
"summer" neighborhood in Whitefish, Montana. She is currently the treasurer and board member
for The Forum Club of SW Florida.
She enjoys playing golf, pickleball, bridge, Mah Jong, reading and socializing with friends. With
her husband. Bob, they have three daughters and two grandsons.
4.F.1
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Susan Jones CAC Application (5826 : Appointment of a new CAC member)
06/08/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Citizens Advisory Committee Chair Report
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Citizens Advisory
Committee related to recent committee actions and recommendations.
CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The CAC Chair will provide a verbal
report providing additional information regarding recent committee activities.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive
Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
Prepared by: Eric Ortman, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. CAC Chair Report June 2018 (PDF)
7.A.1
Packet Pg. 102
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 7.A.1
Doc ID: 5828
Item Summary: Citizens Advisory Committee Report
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
05/31/2018 3:06 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
05/31/2018 3:06 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 05/31/2018 3:06 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 05/31/2018 3:24 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
7.A.1
Packet Pg. 103
CAC Committee Chair Report
The Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) met on May 21, 2018 and a quorum was achieved. The
Committee welcomed Mr. Neal Gelfand as the new CAC representative for District II.
The committee received a presentation on the final draft report for the Golden Gate City Walkable
Community Study but took no action per staff recommendation as additional work is required to complete
the study.
The Committee endorsed the 2018 Regional Priorities (SIS, TRIP and RTAP).
The committee was asked to endorse a revision to the MPO Bylaws regarding relaxing the requirements
for CAC membership to fill long-standing vacancies. The committee stated that it has achieved a quorum
at each of its five meetings in 2018 and felt that the attendance issue had been resolved. The Committee
unanimously voted to reject changing the CAC membership requirements.
Presentations were given on the MPO/FDOT Joint Certification Review and the Draft MPO Public
Participation Plan (PPP). The Committee expressed concern over changes to the PPP that might lessen CAC
involvement in providing citizen oversight.
Several committee members participated in the Stakeholder Group meeting for the Bicycle & Pedestrian
Master Plan on May 21st.
The next regularly scheduled meeting will be on August 27th at 2 p.m.
7.A.1.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: CAC Chair Report June 2018 (5828 : Citizen Advisory Committee Chair Report)
06/08/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Technical Advisory
Committee related to recent committee actions and recommendations.
CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. Staff typically provides a verbal report
at the MPO Board meeting, although the Chair is welcome to do so.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive
Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
Prepared by: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. TAC Chair Report June 2018 (PDF)
7.B.1
Packet Pg. 105
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 7.B.1
Doc ID: 5832
Item Summary: Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
05/31/2018 3:36 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
05/31/2018 3:36 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 05/31/2018 3:36 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 05/31/2018 3:45 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
7.B.1
Packet Pg. 106
TAC Committee Chair Report
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) met on May 21, 2018 and a quorum was achieved.
Actions
The committee did not take action on the “Final” draft report for the Golden Gate City Walkable
Community Study at staff’s recommendation, due to the additional work required to complete it.
Committee members provided comments and suggested revisions.
The committee endorsed the 2018 Regional Priorities (SIS, TRIP and RTAP).
The MPO Director presented the revisions to the MPO Bylaws regarding relaxing the geographic
requirements for CAC membership to fill long-standing vacancies. The committee voted
unanimously to endorse the revisions with the caveat that language be added to limit the number
of appointees representing a single geographic area and that MPO staff work with the County
Attorney’s Office to make sure the existing language concerning “representing other commercial
interests” does not lead to problems.
Presentations
The MPO Director provided a brief summary of the 2017 Joint Certification Report
The MPO Director provided an overview of the Draft MPO Public Participation Plan (PPP), noting
areas in which significant changes are proposed and material that remains very similar to the current
Public Involvement Plan (PIP.) The Director offered to meet one-on-one with interested committee
members to discuss the changes in detail. Committee members were asked to review the PPP
carefully and provide comments by the end of June.
Committee members were invited to participate in the Stakeholder Group meeting for the Bicycle
& Pedestrian Master Plan on May 21st.
The next regularly scheduled meeting will be on August 27th at 2 p.m.
7.B.1.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: TAC Chair Report June 2018 (5832 : Technical Advisory Committee Chair Report)
06/08/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Advisory Committee (BPAC) related to recent committee actions and recommendations.
CONSIDERATIONS: The May BPAC meeting was moved from May 15th to May 21st to coordinate
with the Stakeholder Meeting for the Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan and make less demands on
peoples’ time. A quorum was not achieved. The next BPAC meeting is on August 21, 2018.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
Prepared by: Eric Ortman, Senior Planner
7.C.1
Packet Pg. 108
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 7.C.1
Doc ID: 5845
Item Summary: Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Chair Report
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
06/01/2018 8:51 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/01/2018 8:51 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/01/2018 8:51 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/01/2018 8:55 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
7.C.1
Packet Pg. 109
06/08/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Coordinating Board Chair Report
OBJECTIVE: For the MPO Board to receive a report from the Chair of the Local Coordinating Board
(LCB) related to recent LCB actions and recommendations.
CONSIDERATIONS: Staff prepared the attached written report. The LCB Chair may provide
additional information to the Board.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommendations are reported in the Executive
Summary for each action item, and may be elaborated upon by the Chair in his/her report to the Board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
Prepared by: Brandy Otero, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. LCB Chair Report June 2018 (PDF)
7.D.1
Packet Pg. 110
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 7.D.1
Doc ID: 5847
Item Summary: Local Coordinating Board Chair Report
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
06/01/2018 9:06 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/01/2018 9:06 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/01/2018 9:06 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/01/2018 9:11 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
7.D.1
Packet Pg. 111
LCB Chair Report
The Local Coordinating Board (LCB) met on May 23rd and a quorum was attained. The LCB
approved the following items:
Annual inventory of private transportation providers.
2018 Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) Annual Update
2018 update to Grievance Procedures
2018 TD Planning Grant Application and Resolution
Community Transportation Coordinator Memorandum of Agreement between the Board
of County Commissioners and the Commission for Transportation Disadvantaged
The next LCB meeting will be the held on September 5th at 2:30 p.m., at the Collier County
Government Center, Building F, Information Technology Training Room, 5th Floor - 3299 E.
Tamiami Trail, Naples.
7.D.1.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: LCB Chair Report June 2018 (5847 : Local Coordinating Board Chair Report)
06/08/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to adopt the FY2019-2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
CONSIDERATIONS: Attachment 1 contains the Final MPO FY201892023 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) which incorporates all agency and MPO member comments. There were no
public comments received.
This TIP includes total programmed funding of $398 million; a $75 million (23%) increase from the
previous year’s TIP. The funding is broken down as shown in the table below. (Due to rounding the
columns add to $400 million and 101 percent.)
Category Amount
(millions)
% of
Total
Highways $229 57%
Maintenance 60 15%
Transit 38 10%
Aviation 31 8%
Bicycle & Pedestrian 18 5%
Congestion Management 17 4%
Bridges 4 1%
Planning 3 1%
This year’s TIP has been produced in-house which saved the MPO $10,000 in consulting fees and
considerable staff time. Staff time savings were realized as a result of th e inordinate amount of time spent
with the vendor last year resolving production glitches and inconsistencies between the FDOT Work
Program and the vendor’s output.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) endorsed the TIP
at the March 26 TAC meeting with the removal of the Regional Non-Motorized Transportation Network
Map and minor changes to clarify, update and correct scriveners’ errors in the document. The
Committee’s removal of the map was based on it no longer being relevant t o receiving regional funding
and on the perspective of Lee and Collier County staff that it was counterproductive in ongoing
negotiations with FDOT as to what party is responsible for pathways maintenance along state roads.
The Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) endorsed the TIP on March 26 with the removal of the
Regional Non-Motorized Transportation Network Map.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt the FY2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP)
Prepared By: Eric Ortman, MPO Senior Planner
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (PDF)
8.A
Packet Pg. 113
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 8.A
Doc ID: 5835
Item Summary: Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP)
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
06/01/2018 8:38 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/01/2018 8:38 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/01/2018 8:38 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/01/2018 8:41 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
8.A
Packet Pg. 114
COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMFY2019 - FY2023 Adoption Date: June 8, 2018 The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f) of title 23 U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. 8.A.1Packet Pg. 115Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Commissioner William McDaniel, MPO Chair Collier County (District 5) Councilwoman Linda Penniman, MPO Vice-Chair City of Naples Councilman Joe Batte Commissioner Burt L. Saunders City of Marco Island Collier County (District 3) Councilman Reg Buxton Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq. City of Naples Collier County (District 2) Commissioner Donna Fiala Commissioner Penny Taylor Collier County (District 1) Collier County (District 4) Councilwoman Elaine Middelstaedt City of Everglades City Anne McLaughlin Scott R. Teach, Esq. MPO Executive Director Collier County Deputy Attorney 8.A.1Packet Pg. 116Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
SECTIONPAGEMPO Resolution………………….……………………...…..………….…….…………….……………………………………………….. 1Collier Metropolitan Planning Area Map………..……………………..…………………………………...….…………………. 2Bonita Springs‐Naples Urbanized Area Map……….….…..…………………………………….………...…………….……… 3Narrative……………….……………………………………………………………………..……….……...……………………….………… 4Purpose………………………………………….……………….…….………………………………….…………………….……… 4Funding Sources…….………….……..……...………….………………………….……..………….………….….…………… 6Highway Funding Sources………...…….….……..……..……….……………………………………….………. 7Transit Funding Sources……………...…..….………….…….……………………...…………………….……… 10Addressing Safety Performance Measures and Targets……………………………………………………………. 14Project Selection / MPO Priorities………….…………..……………...…………..……………………………………… 17Highway Related Priorities………………….….….…………...…………….…...……………………………… 19Stategic Intermodal System (SIS) Priorities…….………………...……………….….……..……..……… 20Bridge Priorities………………..……………….…...…………………..…….…….…………………………………. 23Transit Priorities……………….……………….……………….………………..………………………..…………… 24Congestion Management Priorities.……….…………………………………………………………………..25Bicycle and Pedestrian Priorities…………………………………………………………………………………27Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) Priorities…………….…...….….....………… 29Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (RTAP)………………………………………………… 29Major Projects………………………………………..……..…………..………………………………….…………...…………. 33Public Involvement…………………………………….…………………..……………………………………………………….35TIP Amendments…………………..…………...….………………………………………………………….……..……………. 35Certification……………………………...…………………………………………………...…………………...…….………….. 36Project Organization………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..36Explanation of Project Costs in the TIP…………………….………...…………….…………………….………………. 37Project Sheet Example……………….……………………...…………………………………………..……..……………….. 38TABLE OF CONTENTS8.A.1Packet Pg. 117Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
SECTIONPAGEPART I ‐ Project Sheets from FDOT's Five‐Year Work Program FY 2017/18 ‐ FY 2021/22Section A‐1: Highway Projects………………………………………….…….…...……………………………….………… 39Section A‐2 Bridge Projects…………………………..…...………….……….…………….………….…..………………… 52Section A‐3: Congetion Management Projects………………………………….…………………………………….. 55Section A‐4: Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects……………………….………….………………..……………....…… 68Section A‐5: Maintenance Projects………………………………..……………………..………………………………… 95Secion C: Transportation Planning Projects…………………………….…………...……………………………..….. 107Secton D: Transit Projects…………………………………………………………..………………...….…………….……… 112Section E: Transportation Disadvantaged Projects…………………..……………………………………...……… 122Section F: Aviaition Projects…………………………………………………..…………..……..……………………………. 124PART II: Colllier County Projects……………………………………….………..…………………...……..….……………………… 139PART III: City of Naples Projects……………...……………..….………….…….…..……………………………….……….……… 142PART IV: City of Marco Island Projects………………………………………………...…….……………...……………………… 145PART V: City of Everglades Projects……….……..…….……………………………………………………………..……………… 147PART VI: Federal Funding Obligations…………………….…….…….…………………..…….………………...……………….. 148PART VII: FTA Obligated Projects for 2016………...…………………..………………………………………………...………. 158PART VIII: Collier MPO Funding Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………. 160PART IX: Appendices………………………………………………………………………………………...….…………………………… 164Appendix A: FDOT's Strategic Intermodal System Funding Strategy………...……………………………… 165Appendix B: Collier‐Lee Regional Network Maps…………………...……………………………….………….…… 179Appendix C: Airport Capital Improvement Programs (JACIP)……………...……….….…………….……….. 181Appendix D: Acronyms………………………………..……………………….……………………………...……....…..…… 190Appendix E: Funding Codes…………………………………………………...…………….……..……………..…………… 192Appendix F: Collier MPO's LRTP Cost Feasible Plan (Highway & Transit)…………………....……….…… 194Appendix G: Federal Lands Appropriations……………………………………….………………………………..…… 199Appendix H: Summary of Public Comments……………………………………...……………………...……………. 204Appendix I: Criteria Used for Project Prioritization…………………….………….…………………...…………… 206Appendix J: Roll Forward Report…………………………………………….………………….…………….………...….. 211Appendix K: Fiscal Contraint……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 215Appendix L: Section 5310 and 5339 Grant Awards………………………………………………………………….. 217TABLE OF CONTENTS8.A.1Packet Pg. 118Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
MPO RESOULTION #2018-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ENDORSING
THE FY 2018/19 -2022/23 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)
WHEREAS, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization is required to develop an annually updated Transportation Improvement
Program pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 1340), 23 C.F.R. 450.104, 23 C.F.R. 450.324(a), and F.S. 339.l 75(8)(c)(l); and
WHEREAS, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization has reviewed the proposed Transportation Improvement Program and
determined that it is consistent with its adopted Plans and Program; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Florida Department of Transportation's MPO Administrative Manual, the Transportation
Improvement Program must be accompanied by an endorsement indicating official MPO approval;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization that:
1.The FY 2018/19 -2022/23 Transportation Improvement Program and the projects programmed therein are hereby adopted.
2.The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's Chairman is hereby authorized to execute this Resolution certifying the
MPO Board's endorsement of the FY 2018/19 -2022/23 Transportation Improvement Program and the projects programmed
therein.
This Resolution PASSED and duly adopted by the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Board after majority vote on this 8th day
ofJune,2018
Attest:
By: __________ _
Anne McLaughlin
MPO Executive Director
Scott R. Teach, Deputy County Attorney
COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNNING ORGANIZATION
By:-----------------
Commissioner William McDaniel
Collier MPO Chairwoman
@1
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
28.A.1Packet Pg. 120Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Figure 2 – Bonita Springs – Naples Urbanized Area Map 38.A.1Packet Pg. 121Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
NARRATIVE PURPOSE The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is required by Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) 134(j); Florida State Statutes; and Federal Transportation Legislation, Moving Ahead for Progress in the Twenty-First Century Act (MAP-21)and the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) signed into law in December 2015, to develop aTransportation Improvement Program (TIP) that is approved by both the MPO and the Governor of Florida (or the Governor’sdelegate). The FAST Act (23 U.S.C. 133(h) §1109) carries forward policies initiated by MAP-21, which created astreamlined and performance-based surface transportation program that builds on many of the highway, transit, bike,and pedestrian programs and policies established in previous transportation legislation. These programs address themany challenges facing the U.S. transportation system including: improving safety, maintaining infrastructurecondition, reducing traffic congestion, improving efficiency of the system and of freight movement, protecting theenvironment, and reducing delays in project delivery. The FAST Act added reducing or mitigating storm water impacts ofsurface transportation, and enhancing travel and tourism to the nationwide transportation goals identified in MAP-21.TheFAST Act establishes the Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (NSFHP) program to provide competitivegrants – Fostering Advancement in Shipping and Transportation for the Long-term Achievement of NationalEfficiencies (FASTLANE) – to nationally and regionally significant freight and highway projects that align with nationaltransportation goals.The TIP is developed by the MPO in cooperation with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), state and local governments, and public transit operators who are each responsible for providing the MPO with estimates of available federal and state funds. This collaborative effort ensures that projects programmed in the FDOT Work Program address the MPO’s highest transportation project priorities, and are consistent with the overall transportation goals of the surrounding metropolitan area. Following approval by the MPO Board and the Governor of Florida, the TIP is included in the FDOT State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The TIP is a five-year, fiscally constrained, multi-modal program of transportation projects within the Collier Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). The MPA is the geographic planning region for the MPO (see Figure 1 above). The projects in the TIP are presented in Year of Expenditure (YOE) dollars which takes inflation into account (Expenditures prior to 2016 are reported in nominal dollars.). TIP projects include highway, transit, sidewalk/bicycle paths and/or facilities, congestion management, road and bridge maintenance, transportation planning, and transportation alternative program activities to be funded by 23 C.F.R. 450.324(c). The TIP also includes aviation projects; and all regionally significant transportation projects for whichFederal Highway Administration (FHWA) or Federal Transit Administration (FTA) approval is required. For informationalpurposes, this TIP also identifies other transportation projects, as defined in 40 CFR 450.324 (c)(d), that are not fundedwith federal funds.48.A.1Packet Pg. 122Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
The TIP for the Collier MPO is financially constrained by year so that financial resources can be directed towards high priority transportation needs in the area. Consequently, the level of authorized funding (both current and projected) available to the state and the MPO is used as the basis for financial restraint and scheduling of federally funded projects within the MPO’s jurisdiction. FDOT uses the latest project cost estimates, and the latest projected revenues based on a district-wide statutory formula to implement projects within the Collier MPO in the Work Program, and this is reflected in the TIP as well. This TIP is also constrained due to local funds from local governments’ Capital Improvement Programs committed to certain projects in the TIP. This TIP has been developed in cooperation with the FDOT. FDOT provided the MPO with estimates of available federal and state funds, as shown in the Table on the following page. The TIP is updated annually by adding a “new fifth year” which maintains a five-year rolling timeframe for the TIP. In addition to carrying forward existing projects, the MPO annually approves a set of new Transportation Project Priorities and submits these to FDOT prior to July 1st. This new set of priorities, which may be eligible for funding in the following year, is drawn from the Collier 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Projects are selected based on their potential to improve transportation safety and/or performance; increase capacity or relieve congestion; and preserve existing infrastructure. FDOT uses, in part, the MPO’s priorities in developing the new fifth year of the FDOT Five-Year Work Program which is also a rolling five-year program. The TIP is developed with consideration of the ten planning factors from MAP-21 and the FAST Act which are listed below. 1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity,and efficiency.2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users.3. Increase the security of the transportation system for the motorized and non-motorized users.4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight.5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, andpromote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economicdevelopment patterns.6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people andfreight.7. Promote efficient system management and operation.8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.9. Reduce or mitigate storm water impacts of surface transportation10. Enhance travel and tourism.58.A.1Packet Pg. 123Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
FUNDING SOURCES The projects identified in this TIP are funded with Federal, State, and local revenues. The FDOT Fiscal Year ( FY) 2019 – FY2023 Tentative Work Program (March 2, 2018 Snapshot), which will be formally adopted on July 1, 2018, specifies revenue sources for each project. Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate the Collier MPO TIP’s total funding by year and total funding by mode. The total funding fluctuates from one fiscal year to another based on the phases that projects are in and the size and number of projects programmed in that year. Total funding for this TIP is $398 million, an increase of $75 million (23%) when compared to the FY2018 - FY2022 TIP. 68.A.1Packet Pg. 124Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
HIGHWAY FUNDING SOURCES Surface Transportation Block Group Program (STBGP): The STBGP provides legislatively specified flexible funding that may be used by states and localities for projects on any Federal-aid eligible highway including the National Highway System (NHS), bridge projects on any public road, transit capital projects, and intra-city and inter-city bus terminals and facilities. These flexible funds are not based on a restrictive definition of program eligibility and allow local areas to choose local planning priorities. There are also flexible FTA Urban Formula Funds. STBGP funds can be used to increase capacity, improve safety, relieve congestion and enhance transportation systems. The level of STBGP funding is determined by a formula. 78.A.1Packet Pg. 125Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Strategic Intermodal System (SIS): Created in 2003, the SIS is a high-priority network of transportation facilities critical to Florida’s economic competitiveness and quality of life. The SIS includes the State's largest and most significant highways, commercial service airports, spaceports, waterways and deep water seaports, rail corridors, freight rail terminals, and passenger rail and intercity bus terminals. Currently, I-75 is the only SIS facility in Collier County, however State Route 29 and State Route 82 have both been identified as highway corridors that are part of an emerging SIS network and may be designated as SIS facilities in the future. The Collier and Lee County MPOs jointly adopt regional priority lists to access SIS funds. Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP): The TRIP was created pursuant to §339.2819 and §339.155 Florida Statutes to provide an incentive for regional cooperation to leverage investments in regionally significant transportation facilities including both roads and public transportation. TRIP funds provide state matching funds for improvements identified and prioritized by regional partners which meet certain criteria. TRIP funds are used to match local or regional funds by providing up to 50% of the total project cost for public transportation projects. In-kind matches such as right-of-way donations and private funds made available to the regional partners are also allowed. T h e Collier MPO and Lee County MPO Boards jointly adopt regional priorities to access TRIP funds. Regional Projects: Regionally significant projects are projects that are located on the regional network (see Appendix B). FDOT may program State dedicated revenues to fund prioritized regionally significant projects. Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP): The TAP was established by MAP-21 as a new funding program pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 213(b). Eligible activities under TAP include: 1. Transportation Alternatives as defined in 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(29) and MAP-21 §1103:A. Construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized forms of transportation including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals, trafficcalming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achieve88.A.1Packet Pg. 126Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 [42 USC 12101 et seq.]. B. Construction, planning, and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routesfor non-drivers including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access transportation needs.C. Conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors to trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non-motorized transportation users.D. Construction of turnouts, overlooks and viewing areas.E. Community improvement activities which include but are notlimited to:i. inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising;ii. historic preservation and rehabilitation of historictransportation facilities;iii. vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasivespecies, and provide erosion control; andiv. archaeological activities relating to impacts fromimplementation of a transportation project eligible under 23USC.F. Any environmental mitigation activity including pollutionprevention and pollution abatement activities to:i. address stormwater management and control; waterpollution prevention or abatement related to highway construction or due to highway runoffincluding activities described in 23 USC 133(b)(11), 328(a) and 329; orii. reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or restore and maintain connectivity among terrestrial oraquatic habitats.2.The recreational trails program under 23 USC 206.3.Safe Routes to School Program (SRTS) eligible projects and activities listed in the FAST Act including:A.Infrastructure-related projects.B.Non-infrastructure related activities.C.Safe Routes to School coordinator.4.Planning, designing or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former InterstateSystem routes or other divided highways.98.A.1Packet Pg. 127Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
TAP funds cannot be used for: State or MPO administrative purposes, except for SRTS administration and administrative costs of the Statepermitted Recreational Trails Program (RTP) set-aside funds.Promotional activities, except as permitted under the SRTS.General recreation and park facilities, playground equipment, sports fields, campgrounds, picnic areas etc.Routine maintenance and operations.TRANSIT FUNDING SOURCES FDOT and the FTA both provide funding opportunities for transit and transportation disadvantaged projects through specialized programs. In addition, FHWA transfers funds to FTA which provide substantial additional funding for transit and transportation disadvantaged projects. When FHWA funds are transferred to FTA, they are transferred to FTA Urbanized Area Formula Program (§5307). According to FTA Circular 9070.1G, at a State’s discretion Surface Transportation funds may be “flexed” for transit capital projects through the Non-Urbanized Area Formula Program (§5311), and according to FTA Circular 9040.1G with certain FHWA funds to Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Program (§5310). In urbanized areas over 200,000 in population, the decision on the transfer of flexible funds is made by the MPO. In areas under 200,000 in population, the decision is made by the MPO in cooperation with FDOT. In rural areas, the transfer decision is made by FDOT. The decision to transfer funds flows from the transportation planning process and established priorities. §5305: Metropolitan Transportation Planning Program Funds: State Departments of Transportation sub-allocate § 5 3 0 5formula-based program funding to MPOs including the Collier MPO. The program provides funding to supportcooperative, continuous, and comprehensive planning for making transportation investment decisions in metropolitanareas a s w e l l a s statewide. Funds are available for planning activities that (a) support the economic vitality of themetropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; (b) increase the safetya n d s e c u r i t y of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users; (c) increase the accessibilityand mobility of people and freight; (d) protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve thequality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growthand economic development patterns; (e) enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system forpeople and freight across and between modes; (f) promote efficient system management and operation; and (g)emphasize preservation of the existing transportation system.108.A.1Packet Pg. 128Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
§5307 - Urbanized Area (UZA) Formula Program Funds: The Bonita Springs (Naples) FL UZA receives an annualallocation of §5307 funding which may be used for: (a) transit capital and operating assistance in urbanized areas; (b)transportation related planning; (c) planning, engineering, design and evaluation of transit projects; and (d) other technicaltransportation-related studies. Eligible capital investments include: (a) replacement, overhaul and rebuilding of buses; (b)crime prevention and security equipment; (c) construction of maintenance and passenger facilities; (d) new and existingfixed guide-way systems including rolling stock and rail stations; and (e) overhaul and rebuilding of vehicles, track,signals, communications, and computer hardware and software. All preventive maintenance and some Americans withDisabilities Act (ADA) complementary paratransit service costs are considered eligible capital costs. MAP-21 amended thisprogram to include expanded eligibility for operating expenses for systems with 100 or fewer buses. Collier Countyreceives at least $2 million dollars each year to assist in transit capital expenses. Local/State matches for §5307consist of toll revenue credits issued by FDOT and local funds which follow FTA match guidelines. For urbanized areaswith populations greater than 200,000, including Collier County, funds are apportioned and flow directly to a locallyselected designated recipient. Collier County is the designated recipient for the urbanized area § 5307 funding.§5310 – Transportation for Elderly Persons and Persons with Disabilities: The Federal goal of the §5310 program is toprovide assistance in meeting the needs of elderly persons and persons with disabilities where public transit services areunavailable, insufficient or inappropriate. Funds are apportioned based on each state’s population share of these groups ofpeople. Eligible activities for §5310 funding include: (a) services developed that are beyond what is required by theAmerican’s with Disabilities Act; (b) projects that will improve access to fixed route service and/or decrease reliance byindividuals with disabilities on complementary paratransit; and (c) projects that provide an alternative to public transportationthat assists seniors and individuals with disabilities.MAP-21 apportions these funds to designated recipients based on a formula. In Florida, the §5310 Program is administered by FDOT on behalf of FTA with funding allocated to the Bonita Springs (Naples) Urbanized Area. Projects selected must be included in a locally developed, coordinated public transit human services transportation plan. FDOT calls for §5310 applications annually and awards funds through a competitive process. §5311 - Rural Area Formula Grant: This program [49 U.S.C. 5311] provides formula funding to states to supportpublic transportation in areas with populations less than 50,000. Program funds are apportioned to each state basedon a formula that uses land area, population and transit service. According to Federal program rules, program funds maybe used for capital operating, state administration, and project administration expenses; however, Florida allows eligiblecapital and operating expenses.118.A.1Packet Pg. 129Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
In Florida, the §5311 Program is administered by FDOT. Program funds are distributed to each FDOT district office based on its percentage of the state’s rural population. Each district office allocates program funds to designated eligible recipients through an annual grant application process. §5311 funds in Collier County are used to provide fixed route service to rural areas such as Immokalee and Golden Gate Estates. §5339 – Bus and Bus Facilities Funds: This program makes federal resourcesavailable to state and direct recipients to replace, rehabilitate and purchase busesand related equipment, and to construct bus-related facilities includingtechnological changes or innovations to modify low or no emission vehicles orfacilities. Funding is provided through formula allocations and competitive grants.A sub-program provides competitive grants for bus and bus facility projects thatsupport low and zero-emission vehicles.Eligible recipients include direct recipients that operate fixed route bus service or that allocate funding to fixed route bus operators; state or local governmental entities; and federally recognized Native American tribes that operate fixed route bus service that are eligible to receive direct grants under §5307 and §5311. Transportation Disadvantaged Program Funds: Chapter 427, Florida Statutes, established the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged (CTD) with the responsibility to coordinate transportation services provided to the transportation disadvantaged through the Florida Coordinated Transportation System. The CTD also administers the Transportation Disadvantaged Trust Fund. Transportation disadvantaged individuals are those who cannot obtain their own transportation due to disability, age, or income. The Collier MPO, through the Local Coordinating Board (LCB), identifies local service needs and provides information, advice and direction to the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) on the coordination of services to be provided to the transportation disadvantaged [Chapter 427, Florida Statutes]. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) is designated as the CTC for Collier County and is responsible for ensuring that coordinated transportation services are provided to the transportation disadvantaged population of Collier County. Public Transit Block Grant Program: The Public Transit Block Grant Program was established by the Florida Legislature to provide a stable source of funding for public transit [341.052 Florida Statutes]. Specific program guidelines are provided in 128.A.1Packet Pg. 130Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
FDOT Procedure Topic Number 725-030-030. Funds are awarded by FDOT to those public transit providers eligible to receive funding from FTA’s §5307 and §5311 programs and to Community Transportation Coordinators. Public Transit Block Grant funds may be used for eligible capital and operating costs of providing public transit service. Program funds may also be used for transit service development and transit corridor projects. Public Transit Block Grant projects must be consistent with applicable approved local government comprehensive plans. Public Transit Service Development Program: The Public Transit Service Development Program was enacted by the Florida Legislature to provide initial funding for special projects [341Florida Statutes]. Specific program guidelines are provided in FDOT Procedure Topic Number 725-030-005. The program is selectively applied to determine whether new or innovative techniques or measures could be used to improve or expand public transit services. Service Development Projects specifically include projects involving the use of new technologies for services, routes or vehicle frequencies; the purchase of special transportation services; and other such techniques for increasing service to the riding public. Projects involving the application of new technologies or methods for improving operations, maintenance, and marketing in public transit systems are also eligible for Service Development Program funding. Service Development projects are subject to specified times of duration with a maximum of three years. If determined to be successful, Service Development Projects must be continued by the public transit provider without additional Public Transit Service Development Program Funds. 138.A.1Packet Pg. 131Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
ADDRESSING SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS Performance Management is a strategic approach to connect investment and policy decisions to help achieve performance goals. Performance measures are quantitative criteria used to evaluate progress. Performance measure targets are the benchmarks against which collected data is gauged. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) requires State DOTs and MPOs to conduct performance-based planning by tracking performance measures and setting data-driven targets to improve those measures. Performance-based planning ensures the most efficient investment of federal transportation funds by increasing accountability, transparency, and providing for better investment decisions that focus on key outcomes related to seven national goals: Improving Safety;Maintaining Infrastructure Condition;Reducing Traffic Congestion;Improving the Efficiency of the System and Freight Movement;Protecting the Environment; and,Reducing Delays in Project Delivery.The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act supplements the MAP-21 legislation by establishing timelines for State DOTs and MPOs to comply with the requirements of MAP-21. State DOTs are required to establish statewide targets and MPOs have the option to support the statewide targets or adopt their own. Safety is the first national goal identified in the FAST Act. In March of 2016, the Highway Safety Improvement Program and Safety Performance Management Measures Rule (Safety PM Rule) were finalized and published in the Federal Register. The rule requires MPOs to set targets for the following safety-related performance measures and report progress to the State DOT: Fatalities;Serious Injuries;Nonmotorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries;Rate of Fatalities per 100M Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT); andRate of Serious Injuries per 100M VMT.148.A.1Packet Pg. 132Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
The MPO is supporting the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) statewide safety performance measure targets which includes Vision Zero. The MPO will support achievement of the FDOT Vision Zero safety targets by assessing the performance of the transportation system and linking investment priorities to the achievement of targets in the Long-Range Transportation Plan and Transportation Improvement Program. The performance management process will become an on- going part of the transportation planning process. The MPO will continue to coordinate with FDOT and transit providers to take action on the additional targets and other requirements of the federal performance management process. Safety Performance Measures and FDOT Targets Supported by Collier MPO Fatalities; 0Serious Injuries; 0Nonmotorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries; 0Rate of Fatalities per 100M Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT); 0Rate of Serious Injuries per 100M VMT; 0.The MPO TIP supports the FDOT Vision Zero targets by including the projects listed below; each project contains a safety component. 4380591 US41 (SR90) Tamiami Trail FM E of SR84 (Davis Blvd) to Courthouse Shadows – Resurfacing project has had $1.5 million of safety improvements added to it largely as a result of a FDOT Road Safety Audit (RSA). These six projects were identified in the 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan; each project contains a safety enhancement component (see 2012 Comprehensive Pathways Plan, page 53). Four of the projects are on roads where there have been a significant number of pedestrian and bicycle crashes. Providing sidewalks has been shown to reduce pedestrian crashes compared to walking in the roadway. 4350291 US 41 from CF 846 (111th ST) to N of 91st Ave; 6’ Sidewalk on east side and 3 bus shelters;20124351101 CR 887 (old US 41)from US 41 to Lee County Line PD&E/EMO Study4351181 CR 862 (Vanderbilt Beach Road) from CR 901 to Gulf Pavilion Dr 5’ PavedShoulder/Keyholes4380921 CR 901/Vanderbilt Drivefrom Vanderbilt Beach Rd to 109 Ave N Sidewalk4418451 Lake Trafford Rd from Little League Rd to Laurel St; 5’ Bike Lanes and 4418452; 6” Sidewalks4404251Pine Ridge Rd from Whippoorwill Lane to Napa Blvd 6’ Sidewalk Southside158.A.1Packet Pg. 133Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Widening SR 29 and SR 82 will make it safer for cars to pass each other without entering the oncoming traffic lane. SR 82 has had a number of traffic fatalities. SR 82 has been a FDOT priority which FDOT has been able to significantly accelerate. 4175403, -04, -05, -06 & 4178784 SR 29 from Sunniland Nursery Rd to Hendry County Line; Widenfrom 2-4 lanes; SIS and addresses safety concerns on corridor4308481 & 4308491 SR 82 from Hendry County Line to SR 29 widen from 2-4 lanes; SIS andaddresses safety concerns on corridorA significant number of people in Immokalee walk as a means of transportation. The Eden Park Elementary School project will provide sidewalks for children walking to school where none currently exist. The SR 29 project, also called Main Street, is a main pedestrian thoroughfare for people walking to and from work, shopping and other everyday activities. 4390021 SR 29 (Main Street) from North First St to North 9th ST; Pedestrian Safety Improvement4414801 Eden Park Elementary Safe Routes to Schools; 6’ SidewalksThe Strategic Highway Safety Plan will begin in the next two years and will incorporate strategies to directly address the new Safety Performance Measure targets. 4350411 County Wide Strategic Highway Safety PlanConsistency with FDOT Freight Plan and FDOT Asset Management Plan The TIP includes specific investment priorities that support all of the MPO’s goals including freight, modal options, and using a prioritization and project selection process established in the LRTP. The MPO will continue to coordinate with FDOT to take action on the additional targets and other requirements of the federal performance management process. 168.A.1Packet Pg. 134Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
2017 MPO PROJECT PRIORITY AND PROJECT SELECTION PROCESSES The method to select projects for inclusion in the TIP depends on whether the metropolitan area has a population of 200,000 or greater. Metropolitan areas with populations greater than 200,000 are called Transportation Management Areas (TMA). The Collier MPO is a TMA. In a TMA, the MPO selects many of the Title 23 and FTA funded projects for implementation in consultation with FDOT and local transit operators. Projects on the National Highway System (NHS) and projects funded under the bridge maintenance and interstate maintenance programs are selected by FDOT in cooperation with the MPO. Federal Lands Highway P r o g r a m projects are selected by the respective federal agency in cooperation with FDOT and the MPO [23 C.F.R. 450.330(c)]. FDOT coordinates with the MPO to ensure that projects are also consistent with MPO priorities. Federal and State transportation programs help the Collier MPO complete transportation projects which are divided into several categories including: highway (including maintenance), transit, sidewalk/bicycle paths and/or facilities, congestion management, bridges, planning, and aviation. Many of these projects require multiple phases which must be completed in order. Project phases may include: Project Development & Environment studies (PD&E), Preliminary Engineering (PE), Right-of-Way acquisition (ROW), Railroads and Utilities (RRU) and Construction (CST). Some phases may require multi- year efforts to complete, therefore it is often necessary to prioritize only one or two phases of a project within a TIP with the next phase(s) being included in subsequent TIPs. All projects in this TIP must be consistent with the Collier MPO 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) adopted on December 11, 2015. Projects were included in the LRTP based on their potential to improve the safety and/or performance of a facility; increase capacity or relieve congestion; and preserve existing transportation investments. TIP projects are also consistent, to the extent feasible, with the Capital Improvement Programs and Comprehensive Plans of Collier County, the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, and the City of Everglades as well as the Master Plans of the Collier County Airport Authority and the Naples Airport Authority. With minor exceptions, projects in the TIP must also be included in the FDOT Five-Year Work Program (WP) and the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The MPO’s 2017 Transportation Project Priorities, for inclusion in the FY2019 – FY2023 TIP, were adopted by the MPO Board on June 9, 2017 and are discussed below. The MPO and FDOT annually update the TIP, FDOT Work Program (WP) and STIP by adding a “new fifth year” which maintains the programs as rolling five-year programs. FDOT coordinates this process with the MPO to ensure that projects are consistent with MPO priorities. During each spring/summer, the MPO prioritizes projects derived from its adopted LRTP and based on the MPO’s annual allocation of Federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds, State Transportation Trust Funds and other funding programs. The MPO’s list of prioritized projects is formally reviewed by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), and Congestion Management Committee (CMC), and is approved by the MPO Board before being transmitted to FDOT for funding consideration. (See Appendix I for a description of the criteria 178.A.1Packet Pg. 135Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
used for project prioritization.) The list of prioritized projects includes highway, sidewalk/bicycle paths and/or facilities, congestion management, bridge and transit projects which are illustrated on the following pages. All projects funded through the FDOT Work Program are included in Part I of this TIP. Table 1 shows the general timeframe for the MPO’s establishment of project priorities and the development of the FY2019 – FY2023 TIP. Safety has always been an important part of the MPO’s project prioritization process. Safety criteria are included in the prioritization process for bicycle and pedestrian, congestion management and bridge priorities. Highway and SIS priorities are generated by the Long Range Transportation Plan which emphasizes safety. As the MPO develops new lists of project priorities, the new federal performance measures will be incorporated into the criteria. An early example of this can be seen in the development of the MPO’s Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan where the weight of the safety criteria is being significantly increased and will be the most heavily weighted criteria for evaluating potential projects. Table 1 – General Timeframe for TIP Process January - March 2017 MPO solicits candidate projects for potential funding in FY2019 - FY2023 TIP. June 2017 MPO adopts prioritized list of projects for funding in the MPO FY2019- FY2023 TIP. September 2017 MPO adopts TIP Amendment for inclusion in Roll Forward Report October-November 2017 FDOT releases its Tentative Five-year Work Program for FY2019 - FY2023March – June 2018 MPO produces draft FY2019 - 2023 TIPMPO Board and committees review draft TIPMPO advisory committees endorse TIPJune 2018 MPO adopts FY2019 – FY2023 TIP which is derived fromFDOT’s Tentative Five-year Work Program.MPO adopts prioritized list of projects for funding in theFY2020 - FY2024 TIP.July 2018 FDOT’s Five-Year Work Program FY2019 - FY2023 TIP is adopted and goes into effect. 188.A.1Packet Pg. 136Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
2017 HIGHWAY PRIORITIES The highway priorities’ list is consistent with the Collier 2040 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan. The 2017 Highway Related Priorities (Table 2) were approved by the MPO Board on June 9, 2017. The list was forwarded to FDOT for consideration of future funding. Table 2 – 2017 Highway Priorities Phase Source YOE CostPE OA $590,000CST OA $2,540,000PE OA $800,000CST OA $6,350,000PE OA $3,600,000CSTOA $38,100,000PE OA $510,000CSTOA $3,490,00012Old US 41 US 41 (SR 45)Lee/Collier CountylineAdd Lanes and Reconstruct 1.5 $15,030,000 2026‐2030 PE OA $2,720,00019aCritical Needs Intersection (Randall Blvd at Immokalee Rd)Immokalee Rd 8th StreetInterim At‐Grade Improvements, including 4 laning 8th Street$4,000,000 2021‐2025 CST OA $5,080,000PE OA $370,000CSTOA $2,542,00041SR 951 (Collier Blvd)South ofManatee RdNorth of Tower Rd 4 to 6 lane roadway 1 $13,350,000 2026‐2030 PE OA $2,020,000Intersection Traffic Signalization$5,000,000 3Pine Ridge Rd I‐75 InterchangeProjects Funded in CFP YOEI‐75 Interchange2Golden Gate ParkwayLRTP Priority RankingI‐75 Interchange I‐75 InterchangeEastbound on‐ramp ‐ New 2 lane Ramp$2,000,000 Final Proposed Improvement ‐ 2040 LRTPLink in Miles Facility Limit From Limit To2021‐2025$7,150,000Total Project Cost (PDC)2021‐2025$3,130,0002021‐25Construction Time Frame5‐Year Window in which CST is Funded by Source$5,080,0002.0 $30,000,000 2021‐2025$41,700,0007Immokalee Rd I‐75 Interchange I‐75 InterchangeIntersection Traffic Signalization$2,750,000 2021‐2025$4,000,0005CR 951 (Collier Blvd)Golden Gate CanalGreen Blvd 4 to 6 lane roadway$2,000,000 2021‐2025$2,912,000$22,050,00021US 41 Goodlette Rd N/A Intersection Improvements198.A.1Packet Pg. 137Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
2017 SIS PRIORITIES (for Collier and Lee County MPOs In addition to the highway priorities listed above, the MPO forwards two lists of projects on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) network to FDOT for consideration of future funding. The SIS network includes highways, airports, spaceports, deep water seaports, freight rail terminals, passenger rail, intercity bus terminals, rail corridors and waterways that are considered the largest and most significant commercial transportation facilities in the state. Presently, I-75 is the only SIS facility in Collier County. Two other facilities in Collier County, State Route 82 (SR82) and State Route 29 (SR29), are on the “emerging” SIS network”. “Emerging” SIS facilities are usually located in, or connect to, fast growing areas. They normally have lower current volumes of people and freight but have the potential for significant future growth. Should this growth occur, these facilities may be elevated to the SIS network. Emerging SIS facilities are fully eligible for FDOT SIS funding but are categorized separately to encourage proactive planning. Table 3A and Table 3B illustrate the 2017 SIS Priorities for both the Collier MPO (adopted by the MPO Board on June 9, 2017) and the Lee County MPO Board. The Collier MPO SIS Priorities are consistent with the Collier 2040 LRTP. 208.A.1Packet Pg. 138Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Table 3A Lee County and Collier MPOs Joint Mainline SIS Priorities Adopted by Collier MPO June 9, 2017, Lee County MPO June 16, 2017 2012Priority2017PriorityProject From ToImprovement TypeNextPhaseVolume CapacityV/C201 1SR 82 Hendry County Line Gator Slough 2 - 4L CST 12,000 16,400 0.73102 2SR 29 Loop RdSR 29 (South)SR 29 (North) New 4L ROW New 41,700 23 3 SR 29 New Market Road NorthSR 822-4L ROW 16,450 16,400 1.00NA 4 I-75 Pine Ridge RoadSR 826L - 8 Aux Lns PD&E 100,500 111,800 0.907 5 SR 80SR 31Buckingham Rd4-6L PD&E 35,000 41,700 0.8424 6 SR 299th St NorthImmokalee Dr2-4L PE 16,000 19,514 0.8212 7 SR 29 Immokalee Dr New Market Rd North 2-4L ROW 15,900 19,514 0.81NA 8 3SR 31SR 80SR 782 - 4L PD&E 11,100 17,700 0.6326 9 SR 29Oil Well Rd South of Agrucultural Way 2-4L PE 5,000 8,400 0.5925 10 SR 29 South of Agricultural Way CR 846 East2-4L ROW 7,100 19,514 0.4326 11 SR 29I 75Oil Well Rd2-4L PE 3,200 8,400 0.3813 12 I 75 Pine Ridge Rd SR 806-10L PD&E 100,500 111,800 0.90Notes1. Joint Board #1 Priority2. Will improve other SR29 needs3. Includes bridge21Phase Abbreviations: CST construction; ROW right-of-way; PD&E project development and environmental; PE preliminary engineering8.A.1Packet Pg. 139Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Table 3B Lee County and Collier MPOs Joint Interchange SIS Priorities Adopted by Collier MPO June 9, 2017, Lee County MPO June 16, 2017 Project InterchangeImprovement TypeNext Unprogrammed PhaseNotes I 75 @ Everglades BlvdNew InterchangeIJRI 75 @ Golden Gate Pkwy Minor Interchange Improvements Study Short TermI 75 @ Pine Ridge Rd Minor interchange improvements Study Short TermI 75 @ Immokalee Rd Major interchange improvements PD&E Short TermI 75 @ Bonita Beach Rd Major interchange improvements PE Mid TermI 75 @ Corksrew Rd Major interchange improvements PE Short TermI 75 @ Daniels Pkwy Minor Interchange Improvements Study Short TermI 75 @ SR 82Major interchange improvements PE Long TermI 75 @Luckett Rd Major interchange improvements PE Long TermI 75 @ SR 78Minor interchange improvements PE Short TermI 75 @ Del Prado Ext. New InterchangeIJRNotes to Table 3BShort Term - Current to 2025Mid Term - 2025-2035Long Term - 2035-2045Major Interchange Improvement - Rebuild to accommodate future 10-lane cross sectionMinor Interchange Improvement - Add additional turn lanes, operational improvements22Phase Abbreviations: IJR Interchange Justification Report; PE Preliminary Engineering8.A.1Packet Pg. 140Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
2017 BRIDGE PRIORITIES Bridge related priorities are consistent with the 2040 LRTP. The 2017 Bridge Related Priorities (Table 4) were approved by the MPO Board on June 9, 2017 and forwarded to FDOT for consideration of future funding. The cost of each new bridge is estimated at $8 million. Table 4 – 2017 Bridge Priorities Rank Location Proposed Improvement 1 16th Street NE, south of 10th Avenue NE New Bridge Construction 2 47th Avenue NE, west of Everglades Boulevard New Bridge Construction 3 Wilson Boulevard, South of 33rd Avenue NE New Bridge Construction 4 18th Ave NE, Between Wilson Boulevard N and 8th Street NE New Bridge Construction 5 18th Ave NE, Between 8th Street NE and 16th Street NE New Bridge Construction 6 13th Street NW, North End at Proposed Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension New Bridge Construction 7 16th Street SE, South End New Bridge Construction 8 Wilson Boulevard South, South End New Bridge Construction 9 Location TBD, between 10th Avenue SE and 20th Avenue SE New Bridge Construction 10 62nd Avenue NE, West of 40th Street NE New Bridge Construction 238.A.1Packet Pg. 141Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
2017 TRANSIT PRIORITIES Florida State Statutes require each transit provider in Florida that receives State Transit Block Grant funding to prepare an annual Transit Development Plan (TDP). The TDP is a ten-year plan for Collier Area Transit (CAT) that provides a review of existing transportation services and a trend analysis of these services. Table 5 shows the 2017 Transit Priorities which were approved by the MPO Board on June 9, 2017 and submitted to FDOT for consideration of future funding. Table 5 - Transit Priorities 2017 1 $500,000 Collier CountyEnhance accesibility to bus stops to meet ADA requirements. 2 $500,000* Collier County Construction of bus shelters & amenities (bike rack, bench, trash can, etc.)3 $300,000**** Collier CountyRequired Environmental & Design Phases for future construction of a Park and Ride Facility on US 41 at the Lee County line4 $300,000**** Collier CountyRequired Environmental & Design Phases for future construction of a Park and Ride Facility at the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Immokalee Road5 $2,341,500*** Collier County Extend service hours on exisitng routes (1 additional run/ 7days/week)6 $2,220,000** Collier CountyReduce headways to 45 minutes on routes 11 & 127 $1,110,000** Collier CountyLee/Collier Connection8 $2,220,000** Collier CountyReduce headways to 45 minutes on routes 15 & 179 $1,702,692** Collier CountyReduce headways to 30 minutes on route 1310 $100,000 Collier CountyExisting Transfer Point Upgrade (Coastland Mall)****** Includes cost for 3 years estimated at $780,500 per year. (Based on existing routes) *** Cost estimate does not include right-of-way acquisition or construction.Includes cost for 3 years estimated per route per year (Based on current operating hours). This cost does not include bus purchase.Collier PTNE recently redesigned of shelters to ensure that shelters provide more protection from the elements.LocationDescriptionPriority RankingRequested Funding / Project Estimates248.A.1Packet Pg. 142Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
2017 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PRIORITIES Transportation Management Areas (urbanized areas with populations over 200,000) are required by 23 USC 134 (k)(3) to have a Congestion Management Process (CMP) that provides for the effective and systematic management and operation of new and existing facilities through the use of travel demand reductions and operational management strategies. CMP projects that are eligible for Federal and state funding include sidewalk/bicycle paths and/or facilities and congestion management projects that alleviate congestion, do not require the acquisition of right-of-way and demonstrate quantifiable performance measures. The 2017 CMC Priorities are consistent with the 2040 LRTP, were adopted by the MPO Board on June 9, 2017 and are shown in Table 6. 258.A.1Packet Pg. 143Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
26 8.A.1Packet Pg. 144Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
BICYCLE and PEDESTRIAN PRIORITIES Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Priorities are derived from the 2012 Collier MPO Comprehensive Pathways Plan. Beginning in 2018, these priorities will be derived from the Collier MPO Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan which will replace the 2012 Plan. The two plans share a similar vision of providing a safe, connected and convenient on-road and off-road network throughout the Collier MPA to accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians as well as a similar goal of improving transportation efficiency and enhancing the health and fitness of the community while allowing for more transportation choices. After approval by the MPO Board on June 9, 2017, the list was sent to FDOT for consideration of future funding and is shown in Table 7. 278.A.1Packet Pg. 145Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Table 7 – 2017 Pathways Priorities Rank Project Name Project DescriptionAmount RequestedSubmitting Agency/ JurisdictionPhase/Amount Funded in Work ProgramFPN 1 County Barn Rd10' Shared Use Path - west sideDavis BlvdRattlesnake Hammock Rd$1,411,482 Collier CountyPE $176,000 CST $1,879,37643809112 Vanderbilt Drive Sidewalk and crosswalk VBR & 109th Ave North109th Ave. North &111th Ave North$272,248 Collier CountyPE $151,000 CST $709,07543809213 Green Blvd 5' Bike Lanes - both sides Santa Barbara Blvd Sunshine Blvd $567,750 Collier CountyPE $279,363 CST $1,084,67043809315 S. Golf Dr5-ft sidewalks, crosswalks,bike lanes, parking on north side500' West of US 41 & 7th St N7th St. N. & '400 east of Gulf Shore Blvd N$880,000 City of Naples PE $279,363 44043716 Pine Ridge Road 6' sidewalk - south side Whippoorwill Lane Napa Blvd $561,800 Collier County PE $229,418 44042517 111th Ave N5' Bike Lanes/Paved Shoulders - both sidesU.S. 41 East of Bluebill Bridge $480,000 Collier County PE $64,740 44184618Mandarin Greenway Sidewalk LoopSidewalks Banyan Blvd & on Pine Ct Orchid Dr$299,500 City of NaplesPE $45,311 CST $349,40744043619 Bald Eagle Dr8' Shared Use Pathway - west sideCollier Blvd.Old Marco Lane $344,030City of MarcoIslandPE $36,000 441878110Everglades City -Copeland Ave SSidewalksTraffic Circle by Everglades City HallChokoloskee Bay Causeway$410,000EvergladesCityPE $235,000 CST $520,391437096111 Lake Trafford Rd 6' SidewalksCarson Rd Laurel St $492,800 Collier County PE $71,209 441845212Inlet Dr. - AddisonCourt Pathway8' Shared Use Pathway - east and south side Travida Terr. Along Addison CtLee Court$299,707City of Marco IslandPE $31,000 441879113 Lake Trafford Rd 5' Bike LanesLittle League Rd Laurel St $780,500 Collier County PE $92,245 441845114 Immokalee Rd 10' Shared Use Pathway Strand BlvdNorthbrooke Dr $1,209,219 Collier CountyLimits288.A.1Packet Pg. 146Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
REGIONAL PRIORITIES – TRANSPORTATION REGIONAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM (TRIP) and REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM (RTAP) In addition to local MPO priorities, the Collier MPO coordinates with the Lee County MPO to set regional priorities for Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) and Regional Transportation Alternatives Program (RTAP) funding. TRIP and RTAP are discretionary programs that fund regional projects prioritized by the two MPOs. The Lee County and Collier MPOs entered into an Interlocal Agreement by which they set policies for the regional networks and prioritize regional projects to utilize available regional funding. The approved RTAP and TRIP priorities are shown below in Table 8 and Table 9 and were submitted to FDOT for consideration of future funding. A set of regional maps is included in Appendix B. 298.A.1Packet Pg. 147Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Table 8 – 2017 Joint Collier/Lee County MPO RTAP Regional Pathway Priorities Adopted by Collier MPO June 9, 2017, Lee County MPO June 16, 2017 2017 RankRoadway/ Project Project Limits LengthProposed ImprovementsProgrammed PhaseNext Unfunded PhaseRequested Funds Local Match Total Cost 1SR 80Buckingham Rd to Werner Dr12.04 Mile SUP (South Side) NA PE + CST 1,938,608$ -$ $1,938,608 2Daniels PkwyWest of Commerce Lakes Drive t2.50 Mile SUP(North Side) NA PD&E 269,317$ -$ $ 269,317 3Gladiolus Dr Maida Lane to US 411.09 Mile SUP (South Side) NA PD&E 284,424$ -$ $ 284,424 4Estero Blvd Hickory Blvd to Big Carlos Bridge 3.62 Mile SUP (West Side) NA PD&E 297,230$ -$ $ 297,230 Notes: SUP - Shared Use PathCost estimates to be refined or developedCosts based on FDOT provided unit cost for 12' Shared Use PathFunding source is FDOT portion of 'any area' Transportation Alternative Program funds1LC School District has identified this segment as a hazardous walking location. As per Gabby's Law for Student Safety Act, school district identified hazardous walking locations on state highways should be corrected by FDOT by adding a project in its 5 year work program. Considering this is an expensive project FDOT can consider staging the construction. 308.A.1Packet Pg. 148Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
SponsorRouteFromToProposed ImprovementRequested PhaseTotal CostRequested TRIP FundsStaff Priority OrderState Funding LevelFiscal YearLee County Burnt Store Road Tropicana Pkwy Diplomat Pkwy 2L to 4L CST $5,000,000 $2,500,000Funded$2,500,000 FY 17 & 18Lee County Estero BlvdSegment 2Road Upgrade CST $7,750,000 $3,875,000#2Collier County Collier BlvdGolden Gate MainCanalGolden Gate Pkwy 4L to 6L ROW $2,469,440 $1,234,720#1Cape Coral Chiquita BlvdSouth of Cape CoralPkwyNorth of SR 78 4L to 6L ROW $30,000,000 $4,000,000#2LeeTranFacility & NewService RouteCST $3,000,000 $1,500,000#3LeeTranFacilityCST $1,000,000 $500,000Funded$1,000,000 FY 17/18Lee County Burnt Store RdSR 78Tropicana Pkwy 2L to 4L CST $7,700,000 $3,850,000#1$2,962,302 FY 19/20Lee County Estero BlvdSegment 3Road Upgrade CST $7,750,000 $3,875,000#2LeeTranFacilityCST $1,000,000 $500,000#3Lee CountyOrtiz Colonial BlvdSR 822L to 4L CST $12,450,000 $6,225,000#1Collier County Golden Gate Blvd 20th Street Everglades Blvd 2L to 4L CST $24,300,000 $12,150,000#2Collier Vanderbilt US 41E. of4L to 6L CST $8,428,875 $4,214,438#32018/2019LeeTran Capital Expenditures for Passenger Amenities, Bus Pull- Outs, and pavement markings2019/2020Year 2017 Joint TRIP Priorities for Lee and CollierAdopted by Collier MPO on June 9, 2017 and Lee MPO on June 16, 20172016/20172017/2018Regional Transfer Facility and ConnectorLeeTran Capital Expenditures for Passenger Amenities, Bus Pull- Outs, and pavement markings318.A.1Packet Pg. 149Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
County Beach Rd Goodlette2020/21 CollierCounty Immokalee at Randal Interim Intersection Improvements IntersectionCST $5,953,200 $2,976,600#1 2020/21 CollierCounty Oil Well Road EvergladesOil Well GradeRd.2L to 6L CST $31,400,000 $15,700,000#2 2020/21 CollierCounty Pine Ridge at Livingston Road Intersection Improvements IntersectionCST $7,304,968$3,652,484#3 2020/21 Lee County Estero Blvd Segment 4Road Upgrade CST $7,750,000$3,875,000Funded$2,651,966FY20/21328.A.1Packet Pg. 150Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Major Projects Implemented or Delayed from the Previous TIP (FY 2018 – FY 2022) 23 CFR §450.324(2) requires MPOs to list major projects from the previous TIP that were implemented and to identify any significant delays in the planned implementation of major projects. The Collier MPO TIP identifies major projects as a multi-laning or a new facility type capacity improvement. The following list provides the status of the major projects that were identified as such in the FY2018 – FY2022 TIP. Major Projects Implemented/Completed No multi-laning or new facility capacity improvement projects were scheduled for completion of construction phase.Major Projects Significantly Delayed, Reason for Delay and Revised Schedule No major projects were significantly delayed.Major Projects in the FY2019 – FY2023 TIPThe Collier MPO TIP identifies major projects as a multi-laning or a new facility type capacity improvement. The following list provides the status of the major projects that were identified as such In the FY 2018 – FY 2022 TIP. Multi-Laning or New Facility Capacity Improvement Projects I-75 @ SR951; FPN 4258432; Major interchange improvement; $103 million CST, ENV, INC, PE, ROW, RRU inFY2019-2021 and FY2023 ($92 million of project in FY21)SR 29 Projects (Five projects that cover SR29 in its entirety between Sunniland Nursery Rd and the Hendry County Line)• FPN 4175403 Add lanes and reconstruction from Sunniland Nursery Rd to S of Agriculture Way;$3.6 million PE in FY201, $0.6 million ENV in FY2019 and FY2023• FPN 4175404 Add lanes and reconstruction from S of Agricultural Way to CR846 (Immokalee Rd);$4.1 million PE in FY2019, $0.4 million ENV in FY2019 and FY2023• FPN 4175405 Add lanes and reconstruction from CR846 to N of New Market Rd N; $6.3 millionPE/ENV in FY2019s• FPN 4175406 Add lanes and reconstruction from N of New Market Rd N to SR82; $4.2 million PE in338.A.1Packet Pg. 151Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
FY2019, $0.4 million ENV in FY2019 and FY2023 • FPN 4178784 Add lanes and reconstruction from SR82 to Hendry County Line; $1.1 millionENV/ROW in FY2020 and FY2021, $11.5 million CST in FY2023 • SR 82 Projects• FPN 4308481 Add lanes and reconstruction from Hendry County Line to Gator Slough Lane; $3.4million ENV/ROW in FY2019 and FY2020, $44 million CST in FY2023• FPN 4308491 Add lanes and reconstruction from Gator Slough Lane to SR29; $37 millionCST/ENV/ROW/RRU in FY2019Airport Pulling Road – FPN 4404411 Add thru lanes from Vanderbilt (Beach) Road to Immokalee Road; $3 millionPE in FY2021348.A.1Packet Pg. 152Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The MPO adopted an update of its Public Involvement Plan (PIP) in June 2013 and amended the update in March 2015 and February 2017. The PIP has the following public involvement requirements with respect to the TIP: 21-day public comment period prior to adoption by the MPO Board;News release issued prior to the start of the public comment period;Distribution of the Draft TIP to libraries and municipal offices including the MPO’s offices for public review andcomment. Comment forms with QR codes are included in the distribution;Distribution of electronic copies of the Draft TIP upon request; andPosting the Draft TIP and comment forms on the MPO website.Prior to MPO Board adoption, the TIP is endorsed by the MPO’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). Press releases are issued for all MPO committee and Board meetings and all meetings are open to the public. This document was advertised via a press release, had a 21-day public comment period, was posted on the MPO’s website (http://www.colliermpo.com), was discussed at multiple committee meetings, and was distributed to libraries, municipal buildings and the MPO offices for public comment. See Appendix H for summary of public comments received. TIP AMENDMENTS Occasionally amendments need to be made to the TIP. There are three types of amendments. The first type, Administrative Modification, is used for minor cost changes in a project/project phase, minor changes to funding sources, minor changes to the initiation of any project phase, and correction of scrivener errors. Administrative Modifications do not need MPO Board approval and may be authorized by the MPO’s Executive Director. The second type of amendment – a Roll Forward Amendment – is used to add projects to the TIP that were not added prior to June 30th but were added to the FDOT Work Program between July 1st and September 30th. Roll Forward Amendments are regularly needed largely as a result of the different state and federal fiscal years. Many of the projects that get rolled forward are FTA projects because these projects do not automatically roll forward in the TIP. Roll Forward Amendments do 358.A.1Packet Pg. 153Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
not have any fiscal impact on the TIP. A TIP Amendment is the third and most substantive type of amendment. These amendments are required when a project is added or deleted (excluding those projects added between July 1 and September 30), a project impacts the fiscal constraint of the TIP, or if there is a substantive change in the scope of a project. TIP Amendments require MPO Board approval, are posted on the MPO website along with comments forms, and comment forms are distributed throughout the Collier MPA to encourage public comment prior to MPO Board action. The Collier MPO’s PIP defines the process to be followed for TIP amendments. CERTIFICATION The entire MPO process, including the TIP, must be certified by FDOT on an annual basis. The 2016 MPO process was certified by FDOT on March 22, 2017. The 2017 MPO certification process has begun and is expected to be complete before adoption of this TIP. In addition, every four years the MPO must also be certified by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The last quadrennial FHWA/FTA certification review included a site visit between September 12-14, 2016. FHWA and FTA issued the Collier MPO’s final 2016 Certification Report in December 2016. PROJECT ORGANIZATION Projects are listed in nine different categories. Within each category projects are listed in numerical order using the FPN (Financial Project Number) which is in the upper left corner of each project page. Several of the roads are listed by their county or state road designation. The table below lists these designations along with the commonly used name. Common Name Name in TIPVanderbilt Drive CR 901Vanderbilt Beach Road CR 862San Marco Road CR 92US 41/Tamiami Trail SR 90Collier Boulevard SR 951368.A.1Packet Pg. 154Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
EXPLANATION OF PROJECT COSTS Part I of the TIP contains all of the projects that are listed in the FY2019 – FY2023 TIP. The projects are divided into five categories: highways (including bridges, congestion management, bicycle and pedestrian, and maintenance), transportation planning, transit, transportation disadvantaged and aviation. Each project is illustrated on a separate project page. Future costs are presented in Year of Expenditure Dollars (YOE), which takes inflation into account. The inflation factors were developed by the State. Current and prior year costs are reflected in nominal dollars. Projects often require multiple phases which may include any or all of the following: Project Development and Environment (PD&E), Design (PE), Environment (ENV), Right of Way acquisition (ROW), Railroad and Utilities (RRU), Construction (CST), Operations (OPS), Capital (CAP). Large projects are sometimes constructed in smaller segments and may be shown in multiple TIPs. When this happens, the project description (Letter D) will indicate that the current project is a segment/phase of a larger project. An example project sheet is shown on the next page as Figure 5. A – Federal Project Number (FPN) B – Location of project C – Denotes is project is on the SIS system D – Project description E – Prior, Future, and Total Project Cost; LRTP and TIP References (if needed) F – FDOT Work Summary G – Lead agency for project H – Project length, if applicable I – Project Phase, Fund Code Source and Funding Amounts by Year, by Phase, by Fund Source J – Map of project area 378.A.1Packet Pg. 155Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Figure 5 – Project Sheet Example PROJECT COST DISCLAIMER: The “Total Project Cost” amount displayed for of the federal and state funded projects in the TIP represents 10 years of programming in the FDOT Draft Tentative Work Program database for project on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) (FY2018 – FY2027), and 5 years of programming in the FDOT Draft Tentative Work Program for non‐SIS projects (FY2018 – FY 2022) plus historical costs information for all projects having expenditures paid by FDOT prior to 2018. For a more comprehensive view of a specific project’s anticipated total budget cost for all phases of the project please refer to the LRTP. 388.A.1Packet Pg. 156Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART 1 SECTION A-1 HIGHWAY PROJECTS includes Adding Lanes and Reconstruction Adding Thru-lanes, Left-turn lanes, Turning lanes Interchange Improvements PD&E Studies 398.A.1Packet Pg. 157Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4175403SR 29 FROM SUNNILAND NURSERY ROAD TO S OF AGRICULTURE WAYSISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project) Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 4,125,000Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:2.548.Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalENV DDR 50,000 0 0 0 500,000 550,000PE SA 3,575,00000003,575,00000000Total3,625,000 0 0 0 500,000 4,125,000SIS PLAN APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot408.A.1Packet Pg. 158Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4175404SR 29 FROM S OF AGRICULTURE WAY TO CR 846 ESISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project) Prior Years Cost:0CR 846 E IS AIRPORT RD Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 4,445,000Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:2.251Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalENV DDR 100,000 0 0 0 270,000 370,000PE SA 4,075,00000004,075,00000000Total4,175,000 0 0 0 270,000 4,445,000SIS PLAN APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot418.A.1Packet Pg. 159Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4175405SR 29 FROM CR 846 E TO N OF NEW MARKET ROAD NSISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project) Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 6,310,000Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:3.484Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalENV DDR 60,000000060,000PE DDR 4,955,83100004,955,831PE DIH 250,0000000250,000PE DS 1,044,169 1,044,169000Total6,310,00000006,310,000SIS PLAN APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot428.A.1Packet Pg. 160Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4175406SR 29 FROM N OF NEW MARKET RD N ROAD TO SR 82SISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project) Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 5,060,000Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:3.037Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalENV DDR 20,000 0 0 0 380,000 400,000PE DDR 903,3020000903,302PE REPE 3,656,69800003,656,698PE SA 100,0000000100,000000Total4,680,000 0 0 0 380,000 5,060,000<<‐‐NorthSIS PLAN APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot438.A.1Packet Pg. 161Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4178784SR 29 FROM SR 82 TO HENDRY C/LSISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project)Prior Years Cost:1,890,149Future Years Cost: 475,000Total Project Cost:15,009,203Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:1.869Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST ACNP000011,270,219 11,270,219CSTD1 0000171,150 171,150ENV D10 0 15,000 0 0 15,000ENV ACNP0 400,000 0 0 50,000 450,000INCDDR 00000 0ROW ACNP0 0 687,685 0 0 687,685DDR ENV50,00050,000Total50,000 400,000 702,685 0 11,491,369 12,644,054SIS PLAN APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot448.A.1Packet Pg. 162Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4258432I‐75 AT SR 951SISPrior Years Cost:9,119,248Project Description:Ultimate interchange improvement. Part of larger project.Future Years Cost:0Work Summary:INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTTotal Project Cost: 113,038,125LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.651Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST DSB20 0 88,155,297 0 0 88,155,297CST DIH0 0 162,150 0 0 162,150ENV DDR0 50,000 75,000 0 0 125,000INCDDR 00002,800,000 2,800,000PE DDR0 0 814,000 0 0 814,000PE DS0 0 203,500 0 0 203,500ROW DSB2 7,586,343 1,421,587 0 0 0 9,007,930RRU DSB20 0 2,219,900 0 0 2,219,900RRU DI0 0 431,100 0 0 431,100Total7,586,343 1,471,587 92,060,947 0 2,800,000 103,918,877CFP APPENDIX CMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot458.A.1Packet Pg. 163Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4308481SR 82 FROM HENDRY COUNTY LINE TO GATOR SLOUGH LANESISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project)Prior Years Cost:888,506Future Years Cost: 2,800,000Total Project Cost:50,969,065Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:4.022Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCSTDI 000043,281,320 43,281,320CSTDIH 000061,587 61,587ENV DDR360,000 0 0 20,000 50,000 430,000ROW DDR799,2820000799,282ROW DIH76,385000076,385ROW BNIR0 2,131,985 0 0 0 2,131,985RRU SIWR0000500,000 500,000Total1,235,667 2,131,985 0 20,000 43,892,907 47,280,559SIS PLAN APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot468.A.1Packet Pg. 164Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4308491SR 82 FROM GATOR SLOUGH LANE TO SR 29SISProject Description:WIDEN FROM 2‐4 LANES (one segment of larger project) Prior Years Cost:2,084,372Future Years Cost: 1,600,000Total Project Cost:40,569,694Work Summary:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:3.219Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST DI 10,098,829000010,098,829CST DIH 154,2000000154,200CST DSB2 25,147,991000025,147,991ENV DI 50,000000050,000ROW DDR 434,3020000434,302RRU DI 500,0000000500,000RRU LF 500,0000000500,000Total36,885,322000036,885,322SIS PLAN APPENDIX AGator SloughMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot478.A.1Packet Pg. 165Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4351101CR 887 (OLD US 41) FROM US 41 TO LEE COUNTY LINEProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 838,297Work Summary:PD&E/EMO STUDY LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:1.550Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPDE ACSU 838,2970000838,297000000Total838,2970000838,297CFP APPENDIX CMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot488.A.1Packet Pg. 166Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4404411AIRPORT PULLING RD FROM VANDERBILT RD TO IMMOKALEE RDProject Description:Add thru lanes Prior Years Cost: N/AFuture Years Cost: N/ATotal Project Cost: N/AWork Summary:ADD THRU LANES LRTP Ref:Lead Agency: Length:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPE LF 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000PE CIGP 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,00000000Total0 0 3,000,000 0 0 3,000,000CFP, Appendix CMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot498.A.1Packet Pg. 167Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4419751US 41 (SR 90) AT OASIS VISITOR CENTERSISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,038,311Work Summary:ADD LEFT TURN LANE(S) LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.276Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST DIH 0 0 0 16,650 0 16,650CST DDR 0 0 0 861,661 0 861,661PEDDR 0150,000000150,000PEDIH 010,00000010,0000000Total0 160,000 0 878,311 0 1,038,311REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot508.A.1Packet Pg. 168Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4425192I‐75 (SR93) FROM E OF SR 951 TO COLLIER/LEE COUNTY LINESISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 3,040,000Work Summary:PD&E/EMO STUDY LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:13.176Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPDE DDR 3,000,00000003,000,000PDE DIH 40,000000040,00000000Total3,040,00000003,040,000CFP APPENDIX C<‐‐NorthMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot518.A.1Packet Pg. 169Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART 1 SECTION A-2 BRIDGE PROJECTS includes Bridge Projects 528.A.1Packet Pg. 170Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4348571SR 951 OVER BIG MARCO PASS(JUDGE JOLLY MEMORIAL BRIDGE)Project Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 2,200,424Work Summary:BRIDGE REPAIR/REHABILITATION LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.302Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST DIH0 0 21,620 0 0 21,620CST BRRP0 0 1,898,804 0 0 1,898,804ENV BRRP0 10,000 0 0 0 10,000PE BRRP0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000PE DIH0 20,000 0 0 0 20,00000Total0 280,000 1,920,424 0 0 2,200,424REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot538.A.1Packet Pg. 171Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4350431COLLIER COUNTY SCOUR COUNTERMEASURE AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 34,398Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 2,003,443Work Summary:BRIDGE‐REPAIR/REHABILITATION LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/192019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST DIH0 0 0 142,107 0 142,107CST BRRP0 0 0 1,626,938 0 1,626,938PE BRRP0 0 200,000 0 0 200,0000000Total0 0 200,000 1,769,045 0 1,969,045REVENUE PROJECTIONS APPENDIX A P5‐5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot548.A.1Packet Pg. 172Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART 1 SECTION A-3 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROJECTS Includes Traffic Signals Traffic Signal Updates Traffic Operations Improvements Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ATMS Arterial Traffic Management Traffic Management Center (TMC) Software 558.A.1Packet Pg. 173Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4051061COLLIER MPO IDENTIFIED OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS FUNDINGProject Description:MPO SU FUNDS HELD FOR COST OVER‐RUNS, FUTURE PROGRAMMING Prior Years Cost:498,245Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 11,274,657Work Summary:TRAFFIC OPS IMPROVEMENTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SU 2,912,494 2,687,473 1,164,301 2,944,621 1,067,523 10,776,412000000Total2,912,494 2,687,473 1,164,301 2,944,621 1,067,523 10,776,412CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot568.A.1Packet Pg. 174Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4126661 COLLIER COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNALS REIMBURSEMENTProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 1,485,649Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 3,368,404Work Summary:TRAFFIC SIGNALS LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalOPS DDR 298,216 337,826 376,650 414,316 455,747 1,882,755000000Total298,216 337,826 376,650 414,316 455,747 1,882,755REVENUE PROJECTIONS APPENDIX A P5‐5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot578.A.1Packet Pg. 175Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4136271NAPLES TRAFFIC SIGNALS REIMBURSEMENTProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 566,258Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,324,113Work Summary:TRAFFIC SIGNALS LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalOPS DDR 113,940 135,149 153,706 169,076 185,984 757,855000000Total113,940 135,149 153,706 169,076 185,984 757,855REVENUE PROJECTIONS APPENDIX A P5‐5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot588.A.1Packet Pg. 176Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4350131ITS INTEGRATE/STANDARDIZE NETWORK COMMUNICATIONProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2013‐02 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 850,000Work Summary:ITS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST ACSU 850,000 0 0 0 0 850,000000000Total850,000 0 0 0 0 850,000CFP‐CMC PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot598.A.1Packet Pg. 177Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4350191Project Description:AIRPORT‐PULLING RD AND PINE RIDGE RD SIGNAL TIMING CMC Priority 2015‐08; 14-05; 2013 (38 intersections)Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:452,560Work Summary:ATMS ‐ ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST ACSU 452,560 0 0 0 0 452,560000000Total452,560 0 0 0 0 452,560CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot608.A.1Packet Pg. 178Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4371031COLLIER TMC OPS FUND COUNTY WIDEProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 141,750Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 546,750Work Summary:OTHER ITS LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalOPS DS 81,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 405,000000000Total81,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 405,000CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot618.A.1Packet Pg. 179Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4371041NAPLES TMC OPERATIONS FUNDING CITY WIDEProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 50,000Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 200,000Work Summary:OTHER ITS LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLESLengthNA TIP Amendment: Roll Forward 9‐9‐16Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalOPS DS 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000000000Total30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot628.A.1Packet Pg. 180Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4379241TRAVEL TIME DATA COLLECTION COLLIER COUNTY ITS ARCH ATMSProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2012‐10 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 441,000Work Summary:OTHER ITS LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SU 0 0 441,000 0 0 441,000000000Total0 0 441,000 0 0 441,000CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot638.A.1Packet Pg. 181Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4379251SIGNAL TIMING COUNTY ROADS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2015‐03 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 452,560Work Summary:TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATE LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SU 0 0 452,560 0 0 452,560000000Total0 0 452,560 0 0 452,560CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot648.A.1Packet Pg. 182Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4379261SIGNAL TIMING US41 FROM SR951/COLLIER BLVD TO OLD US41Project Description:CMC PRIORITY 2014‐04, 2015‐01 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 516,200Work Summary:TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATE LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:19.96Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SU 0 0 516,200 0 0 516,200000000Total0 0 516,200 0 0 516,200CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot658.A.1Packet Pg. 183Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4380661VIDEO WALL MONITORS FOR THE CITY OF NAPLESProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2017‐05, 16‐05, 15‐05, 14‐13 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 130,000Work Summary:TMC SOFTWARE & SYSTEM INTEGRAT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:City of NaplesLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SU 0 0 130,000 0 0 130,000000000Total0 0 130,000 0 0 130,000CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot668.A.1Packet Pg. 184Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4404351COLLIER COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING OPTIMIZATION AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2016‐02 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 401,000Work Summary:TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPDATE LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCSTSU 000050,000 50,000PE SU 0 0 0 351,000 0 351,00000000Total0 0 0 351,000 50,000 401,000CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot678.A.1Packet Pg. 185Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART 1 SECTION A-4 BICYCLE and PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS includes Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Pedestrian Safety Improvements 688.A.1Packet Pg. 186Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4331851HARBOUR DR FROM CRAYTON RD TO BINNACLE DRProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2012‐3; 5' SW ON NORTH SIDE Prior Years Cost: 110,779Future Years Cost: NATotal Project Cost: 644,691Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.33Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SA391,5630000391,563RRU SA142,349142,34900000Total533,9120000533,912CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot698.A.1Packet Pg. 187Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4331891N COLLIER BLVD FROM E ELKCAM CIRCLE TO BUTTONWOOD COURTProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2012‐07 Prior Years Cost: 52,500Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 814,225Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MARCO ISLANDLength:0.658Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST LFP0 105,146 0 0 0 105,146CST SU0 656,579 0 0 0 656,57900000Total0 761,725 0 0 0 761,725CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DE Elkcam CircleMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot708.A.1Packet Pg. 188Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4349901GOLDEN GATE VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2013‐01 Prior Years Cost: 56,56051st St SW; 51st Terr SW; 20th Ct SW Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 336,874Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:0.50Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCSTSA 56,716000056,716CST TALU 223,5980000223,59800000Total280,3140000280,314CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot718.A.1Packet Pg. 189Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4350291US 41 FROM CR 846 (111TH AVE) TO N OF 91ST AVEProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2014‐01 Prior Years Cost: 268,7056' SW ON EAST SIDE AND 3 SHELTERS Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,419,239Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:1.241Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCSTDIH 25,700000025,700CST DDR 1,064,83400001,064,834ENVDDR 50,000000050,000RRUDDR 10,000000010,000000Total1,150,53400001,150,534CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot728.A.1Packet Pg. 190Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4350301SUNSHINE BLVD FROM 17TH AVE SW TO GREEN BLVDProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2013‐02 6' SW ON WEST SIDE AND PED BRIDGE Prior Years Cost:124,884Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:642,069Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:0.20Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SU517,1850000517,185000000Total517,1850000517,185CFP P6‐25 & APPENDIX CMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot738.A.1Packet Pg. 191Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4351161GOLDEN GATE COLLECTOR SIDEWALKS VARIOUS LOCATONSProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2013‐04 Prior Years Cost: 124,6256‐ft Sidewalk Golden Gate Pkwy; Santa Barbara Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 735,557Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:1.213Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST ACTA 610,9320000610,932000000Total610,9320000610,932CFP P6‐25 & APPENDIX CMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot748.A.1Packet Pg. 192Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4351171NORTH NAPLES SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2013‐06 & 2013‐07; SWs GOODLETTE‐FRANK, 111th ST Prior Years Cost: 100,075Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 920,611Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:1.248Phase Fund 2018/192019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST ACSU 263,9030000263,903CST SU 556,6330000556,63300000Total820,5360000820,536CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot758.A.1Packet Pg. 193Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
CR 862 (VANDERBILT) FROM CR 901 TO GULF PAVILLION DRProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2013‐07B; 5' PAVED SHOULDER/KEYHOLES Prior Years Cost:56,973Future Years Cost:Total Project Cost:397,056Work Summary:BIKE LANE/SIDEWALKLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:0.67Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST ACTA 282,3670000282,367CST TALT57,716000057,71600000Total340,0830000340,0834351181CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot768.A.1Packet Pg. 194Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
49TH TERRACE SW FROM 20TH PLACE SW TO 19TH PLACE SWProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2013‐02 5‐SW ON EAST SIDE; GOLDEN GATE ESTATES Prior Years Cost:51,528Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:234,984Work Summary:SIDEWALKLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:0.11Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SA14,852000014,852CST TALU 168,6040000168,60400000Total183,4560000183,4564351191CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot778.A.1Packet Pg. 195Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4369701CR 92 (SAN MARCO RD) FROM S BARFIELD DRIVE TO 400 FT E OF VINTAGE BAY)Project Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2014‐03 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,330,114Work Summary:BIKE PATH/TRAIL LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MARCO ISLANDLength:1.42Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SA0 1,000 0 0 0 1,000CST SU0 1,329,114 0 0 0 1,329,1140000Total0 1,330,114 0 0 0 1,330,114CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot788.A.1Packet Pg. 196Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4370961Project Description:Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:755,931Work Summary:SIDEWALKS EVERGLADES CITY AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSBPAC PRIORITY 2017‐10, 16‐10, 15‐10, 14‐05SIDEWALKLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST TALT0 0 0 137,986 0 137,986CST TALU0 0 0 382,945 0 382,945PE TALU0 185,000 0 0 0 185,000PE TALT0 50,000 0 0 0 50,000000Total0 235,000 0 520,931 0 755,931<‐‐NorthCFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot798.A.1Packet Pg. 197Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4371851NAPLES BEACH ACCESS SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2014‐07Prior Years Cost:550,225Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:1,690,550Work Summary:SIDEWALKLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.96Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SU0 0 1,140,3251,140,325000000Total0 0 1,140,325 0 0 1,140,325<‐‐NorthCFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot808.A.1Packet Pg. 198Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4380911COUNTY BARN ROAD FROM RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK TO SR 84(DAVIS BLVD)Project Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐01, 16‐01, 15‐01, 14‐01, 13‐05 Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 2,055,376Work Summary:BIKE PATH/TRAILLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:2.045Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCSTSA 000050,000 50,000CSTSU 00001,829,376 1,829,376PE SU0 0 176,000 0 0 176,0000000Total0 0 176,000 0 1,879,376 2,055,376CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot818.A.1Packet Pg. 199Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4380921CR 901/VANDERBILT DR FROM VANDERBILT BEACH RD TO 109TH AVENUE NProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐02, 16‐02, 15‐02, 14‐02 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 860,075Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:1.214Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCSTSU 0000709,075 709,075PE SU0 0 151,000 0 0 151,00000000Total0 0 151,000 0 709,075 860,075CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot828.A.1Packet Pg. 200Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4380931GREEN BLVD FROM SANTA BARBARA BLVD TO SUNSHINE BLVDProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐03, 16‐03, 15‐03, 14‐06 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,310,670Work Summary:BIKE LANE/SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:1.040Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCSTSU 00001,084,670 1,084,670PE SU0 0 226,000 0 0 226,00000000Total0 0 226,000 0 1,084,670 1,310,670CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot838.A.1Packet Pg. 201Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4390021SR29 FROM NORTH 1ST STREET TO NORTH 9TH STREETProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 321,137Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 2,923,394Work Summary:PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.502Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST DDR 1,820,3431,820,343CST DIH25,70025,700CST DS706,214706,214ENV DDR50,00050,000000Total2,602,25700002,602,257CFP APPENDIX CMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot848.A.1Packet Pg. 202Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4404251PINE RIDGE RD FROM WHIPPOORWILL LANE TO NAPA BLVDProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐06, 16‐06, 15‐06, 14‐10; 6' SIDEWALK SOUTH SIDE Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost:332,382Total Project Cost:561,800Work Summary:SIDEWALKLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.78Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPE SU0 0 0 229,418 0 229,418000000Total0 0 0 229,418 0 229,418CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot858.A.1Packet Pg. 203Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4404361MANDARIN GREENWAY SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2015 & 2016‐08; SW LOOP ON 4 STREETS ‐ ORCHARD DR, MAPrior Years Cost:0TO ORCHARD DR, SIDEWALKSFuture Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:394,718Work Summary:BIKE LANE/SIDEWALKLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLESLength:0.840Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST TALU0000349,407 349,407PE TALU0 0 45,311 0 0 45,31100000Total0 0 45,311 0 349,407 394,718CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot868.A.1Packet Pg. 204Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4404371SOUTH GOLF DR FROM GULF SHORE BLVD TO W US 41Project Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐05, 16‐05, 15‐05, 14‐09 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: NATotal Project Cost: NAWork Summary:BIKE LANE/SIDE WALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLESLength:0.75Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPE SU0 0 0 279,363 0 279,363000000Total0 0 0 279,363 0 279,363CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot878.A.1Packet Pg. 205Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4404381SAN MARCO RD FROM VINTAGE BAY DRIVE TO GOODLAND RDProject Description:BPAC Priority: 2016‐04, 15‐04Prior Years Cost:0REMOVE SW REPLACE 8' SHARED USE PATH SOUTH SIDEFuture Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:695,062Work Summary:BIKE PATH/TRAILLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MARCO ISLANDLength:1.440Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SU0 0 0 650,062 0 650,062PE LF0 45,000 0 0 0 45,00000000Total0 45,000 0 650,062 0 695,062CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot888.A.1Packet Pg. 206Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4414801EDEN PARK ELEMENTARYProject Description:Safe Routes to School project (SRTS)Prior Years Cost:0South side of Carson Rd from Westclox to Carson Lakes Cir 6' SWFuture Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:719,071Work Summary:SIDEWALKLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:0.75Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SR2T0 0 0 663,333663,333PE SR2T55,738000055,73800000Total55,738 0 0 663,333 0 719,071CFP APPENDIX CMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot898.A.1Packet Pg. 207Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4418451LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD FROM LITTLE LEAGUE ROAD TO LAUREL STREETProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐13, 16‐13, 15‐03; 5' BIKE LANES Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost:596,010Total Project Cost:688,255Work Summary:BIKE LANE/SIDEWALKLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:0.91Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPE SA92,245000092,245000000Total92,245000092,245CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot908.A.1Packet Pg. 208Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4418452LAKE TRAFFORD RD FROM CARSON RD TO LAUREL STProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐11, 16‐11, 15‐11; 6' SW Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 421,591Total Project Cost: 492,800Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:0.91Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPE SA71,209000071,209000000Total71,209000071,209CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot918.A.1Packet Pg. 209Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4418461111TH AVE NORTH FROM BLUEBILL AVE BRIDGE TO 7TH ST NORTHProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2014, 2015 & 2016‐07 Prior Years Cost: 0FOR 5' BIKE LANES Future Years Cost: 415,260Total Project Cost: 480,000Work Summary:SIDEWALKTO BE CORRECTED TO BIKE LANES JULY 1 2018LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:0.51Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPE SA64,740000064,740000000Total64,740000064,740CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot928.A.1Packet Pg. 210Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4418781BALD EAGLE DRIVE FROM COLLIER BLVD TO OLD MARCO LNProject Description:BPAC PRIORITY 2014, 2014 & 2016‐09 Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 308,030Total Project Cost: 344,030Work Summary:SIDEWALK LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MARCO ISLANDLength:0.89Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPE SA36,000000036,00000000Total36,000000036,000CFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & D<‐‐ NorthMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot938.A.1Packet Pg. 211Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4418791INLET DRIVE FROM ADDISON CT TO TRAVIDA TERRACEProject Description:8' SHARED USE PATHWAY EAST & SOUTH SIDEPrior Years Cost:0BPAC PRIORITY 2017‐12, 16‐12, 15‐12Future Years Cost:268,707Total Project Cost:299,707Work Summary:SIDEWALKLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MARCO ISLANDLength:0.65Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPE SA31,0000000000000Total31,000000031,000<‐‐ NorthCFP P6‐25 & APPENDICES A & DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot948.A.1Packet Pg. 212Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART 1 SECTION A-5 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE PROJECTS includes Resurfacing Landscaping Routine MaintenanceTolls 958.A.1Packet Pg. 213Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
0001511Project Description:TOLL OPERATIONS EVERGLADES PARKWAY ALLIGATOR ALLEY Continued toll operations on I‐75 (Alligator Alley)Prior Years Cost:58,221,322Future Years Cost: 20,925,000Total Project Cost: 99,996,322Work Summary:TOLL PLAZALRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalOPS TOO2 4,155,000 4,165,000 4,170,000 4,175,000 4,185,000 20,850,000000000Total4,155,000 4,165,000 4,170,000 4,175,000 4,185,000 20,850,000APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot968.A.1Packet Pg. 214Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4125741COLLIER COUNTY HIGHWAY LIGHTINGProject Description:Highway Lighting Prior Years Cost: 2,970,537Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 3,995,079Work Summary:ROUTINE MAINTENANCE LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalMNT D331,468 341,416 351,658 0 0 1,024,542000000Total331,468 341,416 351,658 0 0 1,024,542Revenue Projections, p 5‐5, Appendix AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot978.A.1Packet Pg. 215Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4129182COLLIER COUNTY ASSET MAINTENANCEProject Description:Asset Maintenance Prior Years Cost: 8,334,747Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 11,063,319Work Summary:ROUTINE MAINTENANCE LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalD MNT 1,364,286 1,364,2862,728,572000000Total1,364,286 1,364,2860002,728,572Revenue Projections, p 5‐5, Appendix AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot988.A.1Packet Pg. 216Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4135371NAPLES HIGHWAY LIGHTING DDR FUNDINGProject Description:Naples Highway Lighting Prior Years Cost: 1,439,730Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,881,181Work Summary:ROUTINE MAINTENANCE LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:CITY OF NAPLESLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalD MNT 142,822 147,108 151,521441,451000000Total142,822 147,108 151,521 0 0 441,451Revenue Projections, p 5‐5, Appendix AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot998.A.1Packet Pg. 217Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4365851SR 84 (DAVIS BLVD) FROM SR 90 (US41) TO AIRPORT PULLING RDProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 153,976Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 4,284,526Work Summary:RESURFACING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:0.972Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST SA 2,329,50700002,329,507CST DDR 1,701,04300001,701,043ENV DDR 100,0000000100,0000000Total4,130,55000004,130,550REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1008.A.1Packet Pg. 218Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
US41(SR 90) TAMIAMI TRL FM E OF SR84(DAVIS BLVD) TO COURTHOUSE SHADOWSSISProject Description:INCORPORATES SOME RECOMMENDATIONS FROM FDOT RSA FOR Prior Years Cost: 80,000AIRPORT‐PULLING/US 41 AREAFuture Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:8,396,173Work Summary:RESURFACINGLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:1.35Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST DDR0 0 6,593,071 0 0 6,593,071CST HSP0 0 1,564,052 0 0 1,564,052CST SA0 0 54,050 0 0 54,050ENV DDR0 30,000 75,000 0 0 105,000000Total0 30,000 8,286,173 0 0 8,316,1734380591REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1018.A.1Packet Pg. 219Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4385841I‐75/ALLIGATOR ALLEY TOLL BOOTH LANDSCAPINGSISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 969,928Work Summary:LANDSCAPING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST DDR0 0 949,118 0 0 949,118CST DIH0 0 10,810 0 0 10,810PE DIH10,000000010,0000000Total10,000 0 959,928 0 0 969,928P5‐3, 5‐5 & APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1028.A.1Packet Pg. 220Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4395551SR 951 FROM JUDGE JOLLEY BRIDGE TO FIDDLERS CREEK PARKWAYSISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 87,741Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 7,830,607Work Summary:RESURFACING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:3.031Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST DDR 482,5630000482,563CST SA657,9200000657,920CST ACSA 6,527,38300006,527,383ENV DDR25,000 50,000 0 0 0 75,000000Total7,692,866 50,000 0 0 0 7,742,866<‐‐NorthREVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1038.A.1Packet Pg. 221Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4411281I‐75 (SR 93) AT CR 886 (GOLDEN GATE PKWY)SISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,442,340Work Summary:LANDSCAPING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLocation: NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST DIH0 0 10,810 010,810CST DDR0 0 1,221,530 01,221,530PE DDR 200,000 0 0 0200,000PE DIH10,000 0 0 010,000000000Total210,000 0 1,232,340 0 0 1,442,340P5‐3, 5‐5 & APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1048.A.1Packet Pg. 222Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4415121US 41 (SR45) FROM S OF DUNRUSS CREEK TO S OF GULF PARK DRSISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 10,000Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,510,000Work Summary:RESURFACING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:4.735Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPE DDR 1,500,00000001,500,000000000Total1,500,00000001,500,000REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1058.A.1Packet Pg. 223Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4415611SR 90 FROM WHISTLER'S COVE TO COLLIER BLVDSISProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 10,000Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 9,830,884Work Summary:RESURFACING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:FDOTLength:1.38Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCST DDR0 0 0 9,069,972 0 9,069,972CST DIH0 0 0 44,400 0 44,400CST DS0 0 0 706,512706,5120000Total0 0 0 9,820,884 0 9,820,884REVENUE PROJECTIONS P5‐5 APPENDIX AMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1068.A.1Packet Pg. 224Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART 1 SECTION C TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROJECTS includes MPO Planning Funds 1078.A.1Packet Pg. 225Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4350411COUNTY WIDE STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLANProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2012 & 2013‐09; County lead per Work ProgramPrior Years Cost:0MPO will Lead; administrative modification pendingFuture Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:200,000Work Summary:LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MPOLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPLN SA200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000000000Total200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1088.A.1Packet Pg. 226Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4393142COLLIER COUNTY MPO F7 2018/2019‐2019/2020 UPWPProject Description:Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 1,084,975Work Summary:TRANSPORTATION PLANNINGLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MPOLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPLN PL538,441546,564 0 0 01,085,005000000Total538,441546,564 0 0 01,085,005GOALS & OBJECTIVES P3‐5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1098.A.1Packet Pg. 227Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
COLLIER COUNTY MPO FY 2020/2021‐2021/2022 UPWP4393143Project Description:Prior Years Cost:0Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost: 1,093,128Work Summary:TRANSPORTATION PLANNINGLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MPOLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPLN PL0 0 546,564 546,5641,093,128000000Total0 0 546,564 546,564 0 1,093,128GOALS & OBJECTIVES P3‐5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1108.A.1Packet Pg. 228Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4393144COLLIER COUNTY MPO FY 20222/2023‐2023/2024 UPWPProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 546,564Work Summary:TRANSPORTATION PLANNING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MPOLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPLN PL 0 0 0 0 546,564 546,564000000Total0 0 0 0 546,564 546,564GOALS & OBJECTIVES P3‐5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1118.A.1Packet Pg. 229Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART 1 SECTION D TRANSIT PROJECTS includes Transit Projects 1128.A.1Packet Pg. 230Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4101131COLLIER COUNTY MPO TRANSIT PLANNING FTA SECTION 5305 (D)Project Description:FTA Section 5305 Metropolitan Planning Prior Years Cost: 1,341,897Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,730,995Work Summary:MODAL SYSTEMS PLANNING LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:MPOLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalPLN DPTO 9,437 9,720 9,877 9,877 0 38,911PLN DU 75,496 77,760 79,010 79,010 0 311,276PLN LF 9,437 9,720 9,877 9,877 0 38,9110000Total94,370 97,200 98,764 98,764 0 389,098TRANSIT CFP P6‐34March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1138.A.1Packet Pg. 231Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4101201COLLIER COUNTY FTA SECTION 5311 OPERATING ASSISTANCEProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 7,111,080Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 10,781,694Work Summary:OPERATING/ADMIN ASSISTANCE LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalOPS DU 295,600 404,500 366,460 364,222 404,525 1,835,307OPS LF 295,600 404,500 366,460 364,222 404,525 1,835,30700000Total591,200 809,000 732,920 728,444 809,050 3,670,614Section 5311 Rural and Small Areas Paratransit Operating and Administrative ServiceTRANSIT CFP P6‐34March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1148.A.1Packet Pg. 232Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4101391COLLIER COUNTY STATE TRANSIT BLOCK GRANT OPERATING ASSISTANCEProject Description:State Transit Fixed‐Route Operating Assistance Block Grant Prior Years Cost: 16,880,412Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 27,438,509Work Summary:OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalOPS DDR 0 0 0 0 906,623 906,623OPS DPTO 940,849 980,072 1,029,076 1,080,529 227,933 4,258,459OPS LF 940,849 980,072 1,029,076 1,080,529 1,362,489 5,393,015000Total1,881,698 1,960,144 2,058,152 2,161,0582,497,045 10,558,097TRANSIT CFP P6‐34March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1158.A.1Packet Pg. 233Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4101461COLLIER COUNTY FTA SECTION 5307 CAPITAL ASSISTANCEProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 31,983,778Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 47,198,540Work Summary:CAPITAL FOR FIXED ROUTE LRTP Ref:TRANSIT CFP P6‐34TIP Amendment:Roll Forward 9‐9‐16Lead Agency: Length:NA 2013‐0923Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP FTA 2,804,577 2,313,830 2,348,065 2,643,559 2,061,778 12,171,809CAP LF 701,144 578,458 587,016 660,890 515,445 3,042,95300000Total3,505,721 2,892,288 2,935,081 3,304,4492,577,223 15,214,762March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1168.A.1Packet Pg. 234Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4101462COLLIER COUNTY FTA SECTION 5307 OPERATING ASSISTANCEProject Description:Fixed Route Operating Assistance Prior Years Cost: 4,049,814Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 8,099,628Work Summary:OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE LRTP Ref:TRANSIT CFP P6‐34TIP Amendment:Roll Forward 9‐9‐16Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalOPS FTA 442,610 574,297 500,000 100,000 408,000 2,024,907OPS LF 442,610 574,297 500,000 100,000 408,000 2,024,90700000Total885,220 1,148,594 1,000,000 200,000 816,000 4,049,814March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1178.A.1Packet Pg. 235Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4340301COLLIER CO./BONITA SPRINGS UZA FTA SECTION 5339 CAPITAL ASSISTANCEProject Description:CMC Priority 2012‐05; 2013‐04Prior Years Cost: 2,082,366Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 4,164,282Work Summary:CAPITAL FOR FIXED ROUTE LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NA TIP Amendment: 2015‐09182014‐0912‐1Phase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP FTA 353,562 365,428 347,686 299,327 299,889 1,665,892CAP LF 88,391 91,357 86,922 74,382 74,972 416,02400000Total441,953 456,785 434,608 373,709 374,861 2,081,916CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1188.A.1Packet Pg. 236Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4350081COLLIER COUNTY AREA TRANSIT ITS PH IVProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2013‐04; Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,090,136Work Summary:URBAN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP FTAT 545,068 0 0 0 0 545,068CAP SU 545,068 0 0 0 0 545,06800000Total1,090,136 0 0 0 0 1,090,136CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1198.A.1Packet Pg. 237Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4350292US41 FROM CR 846 (111TH AVE) TO NORTH OF 91ST AVEProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2014‐01 (RELATED FPN 4350291 SIDEWALK 2016/17) Prior Years Cost:0INSTALL TOTAL OF 3 BUS SHELTERS (2 PENDING, 1 IN PLACE)Future Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:103,200Work Summary:PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SHELTERLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP FTAT0 51,600 0 0 0 51,600CAP SU0 51,600 0 0 0 51,60000000Total0 103,200 0 0 0 103,200CFP‐CMS/ITS P6‐24; APPENDICES A&DMarch 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1208.A.1Packet Pg. 238Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4404391BUS SHELTERS IN COLLIER COUNTY AT VARIOUS LOCATIONSProject Description:CMC PRIORITY 2016‐01; 9 SHELTERS; NO LOCATION PROVIDED Prior Years Cost:0W/ BIKE RACK, BENCH AND TRASH RECEPTACLEFuture Years Cost:0Total Project Cost:572,360Work Summary:PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SHELTERLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP FTAT0 0 0 286,180 0 286,180CAP SU0 0 0 286,180 0 286,18000000Total0 0 0 572,360 0 572,360CFP‐CMS/ITS PROJECTS P6‐24 & APPENDIX A March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1218.A.1Packet Pg. 239Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART 1 SECTION E TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PROJECTS 1228.A.1Packet Pg. 240Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
This section includes the Transportation Disadvantaged program projects in FY2019/20 – FY2022/23. The Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) for the Transportation Disadvantaged program in Collier County is the Collier Board of County Commissioners which provide services under a memorandum of agreement with the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged. The Collier MPO, as the designated official planning agency for the program (DOPA) confirms that projects programmed through FY22/23 are all consistent with the Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) minor update which was adopted by the Collier Local Coordinating Board (LCB) May 3, 2017 and amemnded on July 12, 2017. The two Transportation Disadvantaged program projects are listed below. The amount for the MPO’s LCB assistance and the TDTF for FY2018/19 will be adopted by the LCB at their May 2018 meeting. The amounts listed below are from FY2017/18 and will be adjusted accordingly, via an Administrative Modification, pending LCB adoption. Collier MPO LCB Assistance FY2018/19 Planning Grant Allocations for the Transportation Disadvantaged Service Fund in the amount of $26,005. This grant allocation is used by the Collier MPO to support the LCB. Collier County FY2018/19 Transportation Disadvantaged Trust Fund (TDTF) / Trip and Equipment Grant The TDTF and Trip and Equipment Grant are funded by the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged. The estimated amount of the grant is $946,571. These funds are used to cover a portion of the operating expenses for the Collier Area Para Transit Program. 1238.A.1Packet Pg. 241Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART 1 SECTION F AVIATION PROJECTS includes Aviation Projects 1248.A.1Packet Pg. 242Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4313661NAPLES MUNICIPAL APT RELOCATE AND EXTEND TWY D NORTHProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 606,841Future Years Cost:Total Project Cost: 2,400,000Work Summary:AVIATION CAPACITY PROJECT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DDR 1,000,000 324,574 0 0 0 1,324,574CAP DPTO 0 109,953 0 0 0 109,953CAP LF 250,000 108,632 0 0 0 358,6320000Total1,250,000 543,159 0 0 0 1,793,159APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1258.A.1Packet Pg. 243Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4336321IMMOKALEE REGIONAL AIRPORT SECURITY ENHANCEMENTSProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 250,000Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 500,000Work Summary:AVIATION SECURITY PROJECTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DDR 200,0000000200,000CAP LF 50,000000050,00000000Total250,0000000250,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1268.A.1Packet Pg. 244Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4348151IMMOKALEE REG APT SECURITY ENHANCEMENTSProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 600,000Work Summary:AVIATION SECURITY PROJECTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DPTO 0 480,000 0 0 0 480,000CAP LF 0 120,000 0 0 0 120,00000000Total0 600,000 0 0 0 600,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1278.A.1Packet Pg. 245Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4370631MARCO ISLAND APT NEW TERMINAL BUILDINGProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 1,510,275Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 7,735,275Work Summary:AVIATION CAPACITY PROJECT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DDR 1,480,000 1,500,000 1,739,893 0 0 4,719,893CAP DPTO 0 0 260,107 0 0 260,107CAP LF 370,000 375,000 500,000 0 0 1,245,0000000Total1,850,000 1,875,000 2,500,000 0 0 6,225,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1288.A.1Packet Pg. 246Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4389761MARCO ISLAND AIRPORT AIRCRAFT APRONProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,600,000Work Summary:AVIATION CAPACITY PROJECT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DDR 80,000000080,000CAP FAA 1,440,00000001,440,000CAP LF 80,000000080,0000000Total1,600,00000001,600,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1298.A.1Packet Pg. 247Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4389771IMMOKALEE REGIONAL ARPT REHABILITATE RUNWAY 18/36Project Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 6,757,500Work Summary:AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DDR 1,000,000 1,600,000 2,806,000 0 0 5,406,000CAP LF 250,000 400,000 701,500 0 0 1,351,50000000Total1,250,000 2,000,000 3,507,500 0 0 6,757,500APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1308.A.1Packet Pg. 248Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4391551NAPLES MUNICIPAL ARPT TAXIWAY DELTA EXTENSIONProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 1,150,000Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 2,400,000Work Summary:AVIATION CAPACITY PROJECT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DDR 400,000 600,000 0 0 0 1,000,000CAP LF 100,000 150,000 250,00000000Total500,000 750,000 0 0 0 1,250,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1318.A.1Packet Pg. 249Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4403081NAPLES MUNICIPAL ARPT AIRCRAFT RESCUE AND FIRE FIGHTING FACILITYProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 1,000,000Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 2,800,000Work Summary:AVIATION SAFETY PROJECTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DDR 1,440,00000001,440,000CAP LF 360,0000000360,00000000Total1,800,00000001,800,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1328.A.1Packet Pg. 250Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4416711EVERGLADES AIRPARK RUNWAY 15/33 REHABILITATIONProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 166,650Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 2,166,650Work Summary:AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DPTO 100,0000000100,000CAP FAA 1,800,00000001,800,000CAP LF 100,0000000100,0000000Total2,000,00000002,000,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1338.A.1Packet Pg. 251Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4416751NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT SECURITY UPGRADESProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,000,000Work Summary:AVIATION SECURITY PROJECTLRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DDR 0 0 0 800,000 0 800,000CAP LF 0 0 0 200,000 0 200,00000000Total0 0 0 1,000,000 0 1,000,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1348.A.1Packet Pg. 252Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4417651NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT RUNWAY 5‐23 DRAINAGE SWALE IMPROVEMENTSProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 3,000,000Work Summary:AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DDR 0 150,000 0 0 0 150,000CAP FAA 0 2,700,000 0 0 0 2,700,000CAP LF 0 150,000 0 0 0 150,0000000Total0 3,000,000 0 0 0 3,000,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1358.A.1Packet Pg. 253Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4417831 IMMOKALEE ARPT TAXIWAY C EXTENSIONProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 3,250,000Work Summary:AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DDR 0 0 150,000 0 0 150,000CAP DPTO 0 12,500 0 0 0 12,500CAP FAA 0 225,000 2,700,000 0 0 2,925,000CAP LF 0 12,500 150,000 0 0 162,500000Total0 250,000 3,000,000 0 0 3,250,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1368.A.1Packet Pg. 254Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4417841IMMOKALEE ARPT ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR RUNWAY 9/27 EXTENSIONProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 0Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 200,000Work Summary:AVIATION ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DDR 0 0 0 10,000 0 10,000CAP FAA 0 0 0 180,000 0 180,000CAP LF 0 0 0 10,000 0 10,0000000Total0 0 0 200,000 0 200,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1378.A.1Packet Pg. 255Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4418151EVERGLADES AIRPARK SEAPLANE BASE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTProject Description:Prior Years Cost: 100,000Future Years Cost: 0Total Project Cost: 1,200,000Work Summary:AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECT LRTP Ref:Lead Agency:COLLIER COUNTYLength:NAPhase Fund 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 TotalCAP DDR 0 630,000 0 0 0 630,000CAP DPTO 250,0000000250,000CAP LF 62,500 157,500 0 0 0 220,0000000Total312,500 787,500 0 0 0 1,100,000APPENDIX A REVENUE FORECASTS TABLE 3 P5March 2, 2018 FDOT Snapshot1388.A.1Packet Pg. 256Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART II COLLIER COUNTY PROJECTS The projects included in this section of the TIP are generally located outside of the Cities of Everglades City, Marco Island and Naples. The projects are funded through a variety of funding sources including local gas taxes, road impact fees, state and federal grants, and developer commitments. Priorities are established by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners based upon an analysis of existing conditions and project needs. Some reconstruction and resurfacing projects may have been initially requested by citizens. Other projects are part of the overall maintenance and improvement program, utilizing various funds, with priorities established through careful and continuous monitoring of conditions. The five-year schedule of Capital Improvement Projects approved by the Board of County Commissioners is shown of the next two pages. All improvements are consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and Collier County Growth Management Plan. 1398.A.1Packet Pg. 257Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Attachment D
FY18 - FY22 5 YEAR WORK PROGRAM/CIE (TIED TO FY18 ADOPTED BUDGET) **
(Dollars shown in Thousands)
Project #
Project Name
SUMMARY OF PROJECTS
FY18
Amount
FY19
Amount
FY20
Amount
FY21
Amount
FY22
Amount Amount
60144
60168
60145
60129
60147
60148
60201
60213
60198
60199
60200
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Oil Well (Everglades to Oil Well Grade)
Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd-8th Street
Golden Gate Blvd 20th St to Everglades
Wilson Benfield Ext (Lord's Way to City Gate N)
Randall/Immk Rd Intersection
Airport Rd-Davis Blvd Intersection
Pine Ridge Rd (Livingston Intersection Improvement)
St Andrews Intersection Improvement
Veterans Memorial
Vanderbilt Beach Rd (US41 to E of Goodlette)
****Goodland Road (CR 92A) Roadway Improvements
16th Street Bridge
47th Street Bridge
Orange Blossom (Airport to Livingston)
Airport Rd Vanderbilt Bch Rd to Immokalee Rd
Big Corkscrew Park Access Road
Whippoorwill
Contingency
Total
820
5,700
23,000
428
500
500
300
300
500
200
200
10,870
A
R/D
D/C
R/C
D/C
R
D
D
R
S
300
19,920
650
250
2,000
900
600
1,000
A
R/M
D
S/R
A
D/M
D
C***
300
500
2,900
5,200
3,000
900
5,133
A
R
A
C
C
D/M
300 A
C
300 A 2,020
86,67061,050
1,000
23,000
R 1,000 R 2,428
5,000
6,000 A 7,150
500
A 2,450 A 7,700
2,000
500
A 2,500 A 9,700
8,000
5,500
3,500
C 8,900
4,000
8,800 C 9,900
R/A 2,450 A 7,250
3,000 D 10,000 A 13,000
3,000
1,000
C 3,000
16,003
43,318 25,620 17,933 84,350 36,500 207,721
Operations Improvements/Programs
66066 Bridge Repairs/Improvements
60016 Intersection Safety/Capacity/Enhancements
60146 TMC Relocation Fund 310
60197 RM Facility Fund 310
60172 Traffic Ops Upgrades/Enhancements
60183 Sign Retroreflectivity Requirement
60189 LED Replacement Program
60163 Traffic Studies/Advanced Planning
60118 Countywide Pathways/Sidewalks Non PIL /LAP
69081 Pathways/Sidewalks Bike Lanes Maint/Enhan
60191 Lap Design Phase
60077 Striping and Marking
60130 Wall/Barrier Replacement
60131 Road Resurfacing 101/111
60128 Limerock Road Conversion 111
Subtotal Operations Improvements/Programs
60037 Asset Mgmt
60171 Multi Project
Impact Fee Refunds
Debt Service Payments
Total Funding Request All Funds
REVENUES
Impact Fees/COA Revenue
Gas Tax Revenue
DCA
Unfunded needs
Grants/Reimbursements
Transfer 001 to 313
Transfer 001 to 310
Transfer 111 to 313
Transfer 001 to Big Corkscrew Park Access Road
Interest Fund 313 Gas Tax
Interest Impact Fees
Carry Forward 310
Carry Forward 313
Revenue Reduction (Less 5% Required by Law)
Total 5 Year Revenues
Beginning Carry Forward
5,050 23,800 6,800 6,800 6,800
2,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
400 400 400 400 400
400 400 400 400 400
1,200 700 700 700 700
50 - - - -
1,003 400 - - -
200 250 250 250 250
500 250 250 250 250
600 950 950 950 950
450 500 500 250 250
3,700 4,000 4,000 5,000 6,000
1,000 1,000 1,000 - -
49,250
10,500
2,000
2,000
4,000
50
1,403
1,200
1,500
-
-
4,400
1,950
22,700
3,000
17,053 34,650 17,250 17,000 18,000 103,953
250 100 100 100 100 650
50 50 50 50 200
170 400 400 400 400 1,770
13,136 13,132 13,137 13,134 13,131 65,670
73,927 73,952 48,870 115,034 68,181 379,964
13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000 70,000
21,390 21,390 21,390 21,390 21,390 106,950
-
1,000 24,557 63,189 16,361 105,107
1,500 1,500
9,980 9,630 9,630 9,630 9,630 48,500
670 870 870 870 870 4,150
4,000 4,300 4,300 5,300 6,300 24,200
1,000 1,000
200 200 200 200 200 1,000
258 250 250 250 250 1,258
-
25,149 25,149
(1,720) (1,745) (1,770) (1,795) (1,820) (8,850)
73,927 73,952 48,870 115,034 68,181 379,964
-
Fiscal Year Surplus/(Shortfall) -- -- --
FY22
1,500
Total Grants 0
GRANT FUNDING SUMMARY
140
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
Collier County Five Year Work Program FY18 – FY22
(TIED TO FY18 ADOPTED BUDGET**
Notes and Key for Attachment D
Notes:
1) Expenditures: Based on current cost estimates.
2) Revenues: Based on current adopted Impact Fee Schedule, projected gas tax revenues,
budgeted general fund transfer, and approved grants and developer contribution agreements.
**Debt Service and Gas Tax revenue are not tied to budget.
***General Fund Dollars have been increased in FY 19 for Big Corkscrew Acccess Rd.
"Highlighted projects are subject to debt scenarios to be discussed during upcoming budget
workshops"
5 cent fuel tax being used on bridges and intersection improvements
****Goodland (CR92A) in FY20 will recieve a transfer from Marco Project 60114 for $2M
Key:
S = Study A = Advanced Construction
D = Design I = Inspection
M = Mitigation AM = Access Management
C = Construction LP = SIB Loan Repayment to State
R = ROW CBO = Constructed By Others
L = Litigation DBO = Designed By Others
141
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
PART III CITY OF NAPLES PROJECTS The projects included in this section of the TIP are located inside the City of Naples. The projects are funded through a variety of funding sources including local gas taxes, road impact fees, state and federal grants, and developer commitments. Priorities are established by the Naples City Council based upon an analysis of existing conditions and project needs. Some reconstruction and resurfacing projects may have been initially requested by citizens. Other projects are part of the overall maintenance and improvement program, utilizing various funds, with priorities established through careful and continuous monitoring of conditions. Please note that Naples’ Streets & Traffic and Community Redevelopment Agency adopted FY2017-18 budgets are shown on the following two pages. Draft capital improvement program budgets for these two departments will not be available until June 2018 with adoption set for September 2018. 1428.A.1Packet Pg. 260Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
STREETS FUND 190
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CIP PROJECT Adopted
NUMBER DESCRIPTION 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
*Annual Pavement Resurfacing Program 600,000 600,000 650,000 650,000 650,000
*Arterial Pavement Resurfacing Program 55,000 0 0 0 0
Total Programs Budgeted in the Operations Budget 655,000 600,000 650,000 650,000 650,000
18U31 Alley Maintenance & Improvements 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
18U29 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan Projects 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
18U21 Citywide ADA Accessibility Improvements 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
18U01 Intersection/Signal System Improvements 70,000 275,000 70,000 300,000 75,000
18U32 Decorative Metal Speed Limit Signs 130,000 0 0 0 0
18U34 Crayton Road Improvements at Whispering Pine 80,000 0 0 0 0
18U33 Pressure Washer (3)7,000 0 0 0 0
Total Streets and Traffic CIP Budget 527,000 515,000 310,000 540,000 315,000
TOTAL STREETS AND TRAFFIC FUND 1,182,000 1,115,000 960,000 1,190,000 965,000
*Pavement Resurfacing is budgeted in the Operations Budget "Road Resurfacing" line item, and identified on the CIP list for information only.
FDOT FUNDED PROJECTS 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
FDOT SIDEWALKS: Naples Beach Access 522,531 0 0 1,142,780 0
FDOT SIDEWALK: 3rd Street North (Central Ave - 7th Ave N)391,178 0 0 0
FDOT SIDEWALK: 2nd Street S (6th Ave S - 11th Ave S)217,324 0 0 0
FDOT SIDEWALK: Harbour Drive (Binnacle- Crayton)0 0 0 0 623,838
FDOT Reimbursement for Traffic Signal Operations on US41 90,751 69,760 71,853 72,500 73,000
FDOT Reimbursement for US41 Street Lighting 138,660 132,000 133,000 134,000 135,000
FDOT Traffic Operations Center 30,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0
FDOT TOTAL 1,390,444 251,760 254,853 1,399,280 831,838
143
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - FUND 180
CIP PROJECT Adopted
NUMBER DESCRIPTION 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
18C14 8th Street S Improvements 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 0 0
6th Ave Garage (Waterproof, Paint etc.)100,000 0 0 0 0
1st Ave S Improvements 0 370,000 2,000,000 0 0
5th Avenue N Interconnect 0 300,000 0 0 0
TOTAL CRA FUND 1,600,000 2,170,000 2,000,000 0 0
144
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
PART IV CITY OF MARCO ISLAND PROJECTS The projects included in this section of the TIP are located inside the City of Marco Island. The projects are funded through a variety of funding sources including local gas taxes, road impact fees, state and federal grants, and developer commitments. Priorities are established by the Marco Island City Council based upon an analysis of existing conditions and project needs. Some reconstruction and resurfacing projects may have been initially requested by citizens. Other projects are part of the overall maintenance and improvement program, utilizing various funds, with priorities established through careful and continuous monitoring of conditions. Marco Island’s Five Year Capital Improvements Program Summary is shown on the following page. 1458.A.1Packet Pg. 263Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
1468.A.1Packet Pg. 264Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART V CITY OF EVERGLADES CR 29, a Collier County roadway, is maintained by the City of Everglades within its municipal limits where it is known as Collier Avenue until it merges with Broadway and becomes Copeland Avenue. County maintenance resumes at the foot of the Chokoloskee Bay Causeway where the road’s name reverts back to CR 29. The City of Everglades, though its Mayor and City Council, may, as future conditions merit, submit improvement and resurfacing of CR 29 for consideration of funding. The City of Everglades continues to focus attention on needed stormwater drainage improvements and pavement replacements. 1478.A.1Packet Pg. 265Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART VI FEDERAL FUNDING OBLIGATIONS IN COLLIER MPO AREA FOR THE PRECEEDING YEAR 1488.A.1Packet Pg. 266Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PAGE 1FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 15.27.17COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:415621 3PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 41 (TAMIAMI) FROM GREENWAY ROAD TO SIX L S FARM ROAD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCTROADWAY ID:03010000PROJECT LENGTH: 2.459MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 4FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTCM-170,512SU-314,585TOTAL 415621 3-485,097TOTAL 415621 3-485,097ITEM NUMBER:417540 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 29 FROM OIL WELL ROAD TO SR 82*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:PD&E/EMO STUDYROADWAY ID:03080000PROJECT LENGTH: 16.961MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTEB22SU261,691TOTAL 417540 1261,713TOTAL 417540 1261,713ITEM NUMBER:428140 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 90 (US 41) FROM 6L'S FARM ROAD TO CR 92 (SAN MARCO RD)*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:BIKE PATH/TRAILROADWAY ID:03010000PROJECT LENGTH: 2.282MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-36,124TOTAL 428140 1-36,124TOTAL 428140 1-36,124ITEM NUMBER:429897 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKS AT 2ND AVE, ESCAMBIA ST, AND 2ND ST*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYTALU129,301PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTTALU-814TOTAL 429897 1128,487TOTAL 429897 1128,4871498.A.1Packet Pg. 267Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PAGE 2FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 15.27.17COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:429898 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:MARCO ISLAND SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY CITY OF MARCO ISLANDSU933,499PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU500TOTAL 429898 1933,999TOTAL 429898 1933,999ITEM NUMBER:429899 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:NEW MARKET ROAD FROM EAST MAIN STREET TO SR 29 N*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03580000PROJECT LENGTH: .010MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYSU839,965PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU1,177TOTAL 429899 1841,142TOTAL 429899 1841,142ITEM NUMBER:429900 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:GOLDEN GATE CITY SW AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYTALT-99,263TOTAL 429900 1-99,263TOTAL 429900 1-99,263ITEM NUMBER:429907 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:I-75 (SR 93) SB OFF-RAMP AT GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY*SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTROADWAY ID:03175000PROJECT LENGTH: .200MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-53,598TIMP68,763TOTAL 429907 115,165TOTAL 429907 115,1651508.A.1Packet Pg. 268Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PAGE 3FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 15.27.17COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:429908 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CR 31 (APT PULLING) AT N HORSESHOE DRIVE*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTROADWAY ID:03003000PROJECT LENGTH: .026MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU183,486TOTAL 429908 1183,486TOTAL 429908 1183,486ITEM NUMBER:430868 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:NETWORK STUDY AND ANALYSIS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:OTHER ITSROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYTALU172,454TOTAL 430868 1172,454TOTAL 430868 1172,454ITEM NUMBER:430869 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 41 (SR 90) AT GORDON RIVER BRIDGE #030300*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTROADWAY ID:03010000PROJECT LENGTH: .078MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 7/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU93,982TOTAL 430869 193,982TOTAL 430869 193,982ITEM NUMBER:430873 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 45 (US 41) FROM CR 862 (VANDERBILT BCH RD) TO S PELICAN BAY BLVD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03010000PROJECT LENGTH: .421MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU580,756TOTAL 430873 1580,756TOTAL 430873 1580,7561518.A.1Packet Pg. 269Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PAGE 4FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 15.27.17COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:430875 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:ADVANCED INTERSECTION SIGNS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIGNING/PAVEMENT MARKINGSROADWAY ID:03590000PROJECT LENGTH: 63.203MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 5/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYSU310,830TOTAL 430875 1310,830TOTAL 430875 1310,830ITEM NUMBER:430877 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CITY OF NAPLES SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03000000PROJECT LENGTH: .553MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU215,556TOTAL 430877 1215,556TOTAL 430877 1215,556ITEM NUMBER:430879 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:EAST NAPLES SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03000052PROJECT LENGTH: .201MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 3/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYTALU261,066TOTAL 430879 1261,066TOTAL 430879 1261,066ITEM NUMBER:430922 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:PINECREST ELEMENTARY SRTS SAFETY SIDEWALKS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTTALU-15,120PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTTALL206,429TALT88,948TOTAL 430922 1280,257TOTAL 430922 1280,2571528.A.1Packet Pg. 270Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PAGE 5FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 15.27.17COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:431422 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 90 (US 41) FROM MOSQUITO CANAL TO SR 29*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:RESURFACINGROADWAY ID:03010000PROJECT LENGTH: 10.660MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 4/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTNHRE-2,735SA52,500TOTAL 431422 149,765TOTAL 431422 149,765ITEM NUMBER:431895 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:8TH STREET NE BRIDGE FROM GOLDEN GATE BLVD TO RANDALL BLVD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTIONROADWAY ID:03000000PROJECT LENGTH: 3.212MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 2FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU47,447TOTAL 431895 147,447TOTAL 431895 147,447ITEM NUMBER:433173 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:SR 84 (DAVIS BLVD) FROM COUNTY BARN RD TO SANTA BARBARA BLVD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:WIDEN/RESURFACE EXIST LANESROADWAY ID:03001000PROJECT LENGTH: 1.009MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 3/ 3/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-10,811PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU109,544TOTAL 433173 198,733TOTAL 433173 198,733ITEM NUMBER:433177 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CR 886 (GOLDEN GATE) AT LIVINGSTON RD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:ADD TURN LANE(S)ROADWAY ID:03511000PROJECT LENGTH: .140MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 6/ 1FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYSU154PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU509TOTAL 433177 1663TOTAL 433177 16631538.A.1Packet Pg. 271Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PAGE 6FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 15.27.17COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:433181 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:ST ANNS SCHOOL SIDEWALKS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU6,002PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU373,875TOTAL 433181 1379,877TOTAL 433181 1379,877ITEM NUMBER:433185 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:HARBOUR DR FROM CRAYTON RD TO BINNACLE DR*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03516000PROJECT LENGTH: .333MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU14,348TOTAL 433185 114,348TOTAL 433185 114,348ITEM NUMBER:433186 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:2ND STREET SOUTH FROM 11TH AVENUE SOUTH TO 6TH AVENUE SOUTH*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU217,643TOTAL 433186 1217,643TOTAL 433186 1217,643ITEM NUMBER:433187 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:N BARFIELD DR FROM COLLIER BLVD TO SAN MARCO RD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03000055PROJECT LENGTH: 1.925MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 2/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY CITY OF MARCO ISLANDSU697,440PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU2,735TOTAL 433187 1700,175TOTAL 433187 1700,1751548.A.1Packet Pg. 272Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PAGE 7FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 15.27.17COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:433188 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:3RD STREET NORTH FROM CENTRAL AVENUE TO 7TH AVE NORTH*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU19,861PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU308,103TOTAL 433188 1327,964TOTAL 433188 1327,964ITEM NUMBER:433190 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:MOORING LINE DR FROM BRIDGE #030125 TO US 41*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03634001PROJECT LENGTH: .617MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 4/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU-1,844PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU252,808TOTAL 433190 1250,964TOTAL 433190 1250,964ITEM NUMBER:435029 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:US 41 FROM CR 846 (111TH AVE) TO N OF 91ST AVE*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03010000PROJECT LENGTH: 1.241MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU265,447TOTAL 435029 1265,447TOTAL 435029 1265,447ITEM NUMBER:435119 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:49TH TERRACE SW FROM 20TH PLACE SW TO 19TH PLACE SW*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:SIDEWALKROADWAY ID:03000000PROJECT LENGTH: .001MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY COLLIER COUNTYTALT50,528PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTTALT1,000TOTAL 435119 151,528TOTAL 435119 151,5281558.A.1Packet Pg. 273Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PAGE 8FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 15.27.17COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================HIGHWAYS================ITEM NUMBER:435368 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CR 846/IMMOKALEE RD AT RANDALL BLVD*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:PD&E/EMO STUDYROADWAY ID:03590000PROJECT LENGTH: .200MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 6/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTSU10,200TOTAL 435368 110,200TOTAL 435368 110,200ITEM NUMBER:435393 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:PINE RIDGE RD AT US 41*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTROADWAY ID:03000000PROJECT LENGTH: .253MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: CONSTRUCTION / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTEB-18,030SA-300TOTAL 435393 1-18,330TOTAL 435393 1-18,330ITEM NUMBER:440128 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:N 15TH ST (SR 29) INTERSECTION LIGHTING RETROFIT*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:LIGHTINGROADWAY ID:03080000PROJECT LENGTH: .200MILANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 2/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: MANAGED BY FDOTHSP10,000TOTAL 440128 110,000TOTAL 440128 110,000TOTAL DIST: 016,064,833TOTAL HIGHWAYS6,064,8331568.A.1Packet Pg. 274Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PAGE 9FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE RUN: 10/27/2017OFFICE OF WORK PROGRAM TIME RUN: 15.27.17COLLIER MPO ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS REPORT MBROBLTP================PLANNING================ITEM NUMBER:425670 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:COLLIER COUNTY MPO FY 2015/2016 UPWP*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:TRANSPORTATION PLANNINGROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY NOT AVAILABLEPL-107,719TOTAL 425670 1-107,719TOTAL 425670 1-107,719ITEM NUMBER:439314 1PROJECT DESCRIPTION:COLLIER COUNTY MPO FY 2016/2017-2017/2018 UPWP*NON-SIS*DISTRICT:01COUNTY:COLLIERTYPE OF WORK:TRANSPORTATION PLANNINGROADWAY ID:PROJECT LENGTH: .000LANES EXIST/IMPROVED/ADDED: 0/ 0/ 0FUNDCODE 2017____ _______________PHASE: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING / RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: RESPONSIBLE AGENCY NOT AVAILABLEPL776,442TOTAL 439314 1776,442TOTAL 439314 1776,442TOTAL DIST: 01668,723TOTAL PLANNING668,723GRAND TOTAL 6,733,5561578.A.1Packet Pg. 275Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART VII FTA OBLIGATED FUNDS FOR FY 2017 The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) annually produces a list of projects for which federal funds have been obligated in the preceding year. The list is shown on the next page. 1588.A.1Packet Pg. 276Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
FY 2017 Obligated FTA Funds October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017 Description FTA FL # Awarded Amount Executed Date FTA 5307 FY16 FL2017-035 $2,743,559 April 17, 2017 FTA 5339 FY16 FL2017-017 $299,327 May 11, 2017 1598.A.1Packet Pg. 277Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PART VIII COLLIER MPO FUNDING SUMMARY The FDOT Five-Year TIP Funding Summary for the Collier MPO is shown on the following page. 1608.A.1Packet Pg. 278Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Effective Date: 03/02/2018 Florida Department of Transportation Run: 03/02/2018 07.06.48
5 Year TIP - Fund Summary
COLLIER MPO
Fund Fund Name <2019 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 >2023 All Years
TOTAL OUTSIDE
YEARS
26,907,190 0 0 0 0 0 8,275,000 35,182,190
ACNP ADVANCE
CONSTRUCTION
NHPP
0 0 400,000 687,685 0 11,320,219 26,729,512 39,137,416
ACSA ADVANCE
CONSTRUCTION
(SA)
0 6,527,383 0 0 0 0 0 6,527,383
ACSU ADVANCE
CONSTRUCTION
(SU)
788,642 2,404,760 0 0 0 0 0 3,193,402
ACTA ADVANCE
CONSTRUCTION
TALT
0 893,299 0 0 0 0 0 893,299
ACTU ADVANCE
CONSTRUCTION
TALU
224,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 224,700
BNIR INTRASTATE R/W &
BRIDGE BONDS
0 0 2,131,985 0 0 0 0 2,131,985
BRRP STATE BRIDGE
REPAIR & REHAB
27,399 0 260,000 2,098,804 1,626,938 0 0 4,013,141
CIGP COUNTY
INCENTIVE GRANT
PROGRAM
0 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 0 1,500,000
D UNRESTRICTED
STATE PRIMARY
9,242,280 1,838,576 1,852,810 503,179 0 0 0 13,436,845
DDR DISTRICT
DEDICATED
REVENUE
15,988,292 23,748,656 5,557,549 14,953,968 11,345,025 5,548,354 4,875,000 82,016,844
DI ST. - S/W
INTER/INTRASTATE
HWY
520,000 10,648,829 0 446,100 0 43,452,470 10,974,878 66,042,277
DIH STATE IN-HOUSE
PRODUCT
SUPPORT
1,171,577 591,985 30,000 205,390 203,157 61,587 0 2,263,696
DPTO STATE - PTO 6,598,637 1,300,286 1,592,245 1,299,060 1,090,406 227,933 0 12,108,567
DS STATE PRIMARY
HIGHWAYS & PTO
4,926,372 1,861,383 111,000 314,500 817,512 111,000 0 8,141,767
DSB2 EVERGLADES
PKY/ALLIGATOR
ALLEY
0 32,734,334 1,421,587 90,375,197 0 0 0 124,531,118
DU STATE
PRIMARY/FEDERAL
REIMB
4,628,564 371,096 482,260 445,470 443,232 404,525 0 6,775,147
FAA FEDERAL
AVIATION ADMIN
658,731 3,240,000 2,925,000 2,700,000 180,000 0 0 9,703,731
FTA FEDERAL TRANSIT
ADMINISTRATION
29,327,384 3,600,749 3,253,555 3,195,751 3,042,886 2,769,667 0 45,189,992
FTAT FHWA TRANSFER
TO FTA (NON-BUD)
0 545,068 51,600 0 286,180 0 0 882,848
GMR GROWTH
MANAGEMENT
FOR SIS
1,799,608 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,799,608
HSP SAFETY (HIWAY
SAFETY
PROGRAM)
0 0 0 1,564,052 0 0 0 1,564,052
IMD INTERSTATE
MAINTENANCE
DISCRET
204,989 0 0 0 0 0 0 204,989
LF LOCAL FUNDS 21,716,394 4,600,531 4,157,036 5,430,851 2,499,900 2,765,431 0 41,170,143
LFP LOCAL FUNDS FOR
PARTICIPATING
52,500 0 105,146 0 0 0 0 157,646
PL METRO PLAN (85%
FA; 15% OTHER)
0 538,441 546,564 546,564 546,564 546,564 0 2,724,697
REPE REPURPOSED
FEDERAL
EARMARKS
0 3,656,698 0 0 0 0 0 3,656,698
3/2/2018http://tlhost01.dot.state.fl.us:8080/ibi_apps/WFServlet?FSRV=MVS&IBIF_focexec=DRIV...
161
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
SA STP, ANY AREA 0 11,838,101 1,000 54,050 0 50,000 0 11,943,151
SIWR 2015 SB2514A-
STRATEGIC INT
SYS
0 0 0 0 0 500,000 0 500,000
SR2T SAFE ROUTES -
TRANSFER
0 55,738 0 0 663,333 0 0 719,071
SU STP, URBAN
AREAS > 200K
974,718 4,531,380 4,724,766 4,397,386 4,740,644 4,740,644 0 24,109,538
TALT TRANSPORTATION
ALTS- ANY AREA
51,528 57,716 50,000 0 137,986 0 0 297,230
TALU TRANSPORTATION
ALTS- >200K
0 392,202 185,000 45,311 382,945 349,407 0 1,354,865
TCSP TRANS,
COMMUNITY &
SYSTEM PRES
754,574 0 0 0 0 0 0 754,574
TO02 EVERGLADES
PARKWAY
58,252,486 4,155,000 4,165,000 4,170,000 4,175,000 4,185,000 20,925,000 100,027,486
Grand
Total
184,816,565 120,132,211 34,004,103 134,933,318 32,181,708 77,032,801 71,779,390 654,880,096
Page 2 of 3STIP/TIP
3/2/2018http://tlhost01.dot.state.fl.us:8080/ibi_apps/WFServlet?FSRV=MVS&IBIF_focexec=DRIV...
162
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
Effective Date: 03/02/2018 Florida Department of Transportation Run: 03/02/2018 07.06.48
5 Year TIP - Fund Type Summary
COLLIER MPO
Fund
TYPE <2019 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 >2023 All Years
Federal 43,343,136 34,450,865 12,568,145 13,636,269 10,137,590 20,181,026 27,979,512 162,296,543
Federal Earmark 4,176,808 4,201,766 51,600 0 286,180 0 0 8,716,354
Local 21,768,894 4,600,531 4,262,182 5,430,851 2,499,900 2,765,431 0 41,327,789
R/W and Bridge Bonds 0 0 2,131,985 0 0 0 0 2,131,985
State 100% 57,275,241 39,989,715 9,403,604 21,321,001 15,083,038 49,901,344 22,874,878 215,848,821
Toll/Turnpike 58,252,486 36,889,334 5,586,587 94,545,197 4,175,000 4,185,000 20,925,000 224,558,604
Grand Total 184,816,565 120,132,211 34,004,103 134,933,318 32,181,708 77,032,801 71,779,390 654,880,096
Page 3 of 3STIP/TIP
3/2/2018http://tlhost01.dot.state.fl.us:8080/ibi_apps/WFServlet?FSRV=MVS&IBIF_focexec=DRIV...
163
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
PART IX APPENDICES 1648.A.1Packet Pg. 282Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
APPENDIX A FDOT’S STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN FY2017/18 – FY2021/22 SECOND FIVE YEAR PLAN FY2022/23 – FY2026/27 COST FEASIBLE PLAN FOR 2024-2040 The following pages illustrate the FDOT Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Plans for District 1. The plans may be downloaded at: http://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/programs/mspi/plans/ 1658.A.1Packet Pg. 283Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
FY
FY
2021/20222017/2018
Multi-Modal
F F Y P
Strategic Intermodal System Funding Strategy
Capacity Projects on2017/2018 throug h FY 2021/2022the Strategic Intermodal System
State of Florida Department of Transportation
166
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
First Five Year Plan*
The First Five Plan illustrates projects on the SIS that are
funded by the legislature in the Work Program (Year 1)
and projects that are programmed for proposed funding in
the next 2 to 5 years.
Update Cycle: Adopted annually by the
Legislature, effective July 1st each year
with the start of the new fiscal year.
*SIS Capacity Projects included in the
Adopted Five-Year Work Program
Cost Feasible Plan
The Cost Feasible Plan illustrates projects on the SIS that are considered financially feasible
during the last fifteen years (years 11 to 25) of the State’s Long Range Plan, based on current revenue
forecasts. Projects in this plan could move forward into the Second Five as funds become available or
backwards into the Needs Plan if revenues fall short of projections.
Update Cycle: Typically updated every 2 to 3 years as new revenue forecasts become available.
Second Five Year Plan
Typically updated
annually, usually in late summer
following the First Five Plan update.
The FDOT Systems Planning Office produces a document set known as the SIS Funding Strategy, which includes three inter-
related sequential documents that identify potential Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Capacity Improvement projects in vari-
ous stages of development. All of the projects identified within the SIS Funding Strategy are considered financially feasible for
implementation within the next 25 year period. The Florida Legislature established the SIS in 2003 to enhance Florida’s
economic prosperity and competitiveness. The system encompasses transportation facilities of statewide and interregional
significance, and is focused on the efficient movement of passengers and freight. The combined document set, as illustrated
below, illustrates projects that are funded (Year 1), programmed for proposed funding (Years 2 through 5), planned to be
funded (Years 6 through 10), and considered financially feasible based on projected State revenues (Years 11 through 25).
The Second Five Year Plan illustrates projects that are
planned to be funded in the five years (Years 6 through
beyond the Adopted Work ProgramH[FOXGLQJ 7XUQSLNH
3URMHFWVLQWKLVplan could move IRUZDUG LQWRWKH
)LUVW)LYH<HDUPlan as funds become available.
Update Cycle:
167
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
MAP IDDESCRIPTIONTOTALDISTRICTMANAGED20182019202020212022FACILITYTOTALLOCALFUNDSTOTALSTATEMANAGEDDistrict 1 SIS Interstate Plan ENV PD&E PE ROW CON4301855Fgt I-4 @ SR 33 Interchange ModificationModify Interchange$577$0$1,205$0$0$1,233$0$5494301853I-4 @ SR 33 Interchange ModificationModify Interchange$3,310$1,400$0$50$0$1,730$0$3,0302012153I-4 at SR 557Modify Interchange$8,551$0$80,142$0$0$1$0$88,6922010325I-75 (SR 93) at US 301 InterchangeModify Interchange$13,665$1,821$189,835$0$0$968$0$204,3532012775I-75 (SR93) at Bee Ridge RoadModify Interchange$3,224$0$0$2,854$10,361$318$0$16,1204062253I-75 @ Corkscrew InterchangeModify Interchange$77$0$0$0$0$0$0$774206132I-75 at Fruitville Road/CR 780Modify Interchange$25$704$1,786$0$0$2,515$0$02010326I-75 at SR 64Modify Interchange$798$2,250$0$0$0$2,894$0$1542010322I-75 at SR 70 InterchangeModify Interchange$109,605$0$0$0$0$95,703$0$13,9022012773I-75 at SR 72Modify Interchange$13$0$0$600$0$613$0$04130651I-75 at SR 884 (colonial Blvd) InterchangeModify Interchange$1,774$0$40,512$0$0$312$0$41,9754258432I-75 at SR 951Modify Interchange$1,824$1,717$50$89,371$0$1,669$0$91,2934062254I-75 from S of Corkscrew Road to S of Daniels ParkwayAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$1,193$0$0$0$0$8$0$1,1854130424I-75 from S of N Jones Loop to N of US 17Add 2 to Build 6 Lanes$45,110$0$2,250$0$0$3$0$47,357ANNUAL TOTALS$189,746$7,892$315,780$92,875$10,361$107,967$0$508,687All Values in Thousands of "As Programmed" DollarsPE - Preliminary Engineering;ROW - Right-of-Way;PD&E - Project Development & Environmental;TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS include all funds that start with LF fund code;CON - Construction & Support (may Include Grants);ENV - Environmental Mitigation;1688.A.1Packet Pg. 286Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
27
17
4
27
27
75
75
75
275
441
17
4301853
4301855
2012153
2010322
4206132
2012775
2012773
2010325
2010326
4130424
4062254
4130651
4062253
4258432
80
80
70 70
82
29
60
60
64
70
29
710
Polk
Collier
Lee Hendry
Glades
HighlandsHardee
Manatee
De Soto
Okeechobee
Sarasota
Charlotte
First Five YearsInterstate Plan
DISTRICT 1
LEGEND
Projects color coded by highest project phase.
Some projects may overlap on map.
Project costs are subject to change.
NOTES
HIGHWAY
Capacity Improvement Projects
STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM
FY 2017/2018 through FY 2021/2022(as of July 1, 2017)
Adopted Work Program
0 20 4010
Miles
Project Phase
Project Development & Environment
Preliminary Engineering
Right-Of-Way
Construction
Environmental Mitigation
169
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
MAP IDDESCRIPTIONTOTALDISTRICTMANAGED20182019202020212022FACILITYTOTALLOCALFUNDSTOTALSTATEMANAGEDDistrict 1 SIS Non-Interstate Plan ENV PD&E PE ROW CON4365631North Jones Loop Rd from Burnt Store Road to Piper RoadAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$0$0$1,257$0$0$1,257$0$04389021SR 15/700 (US 98/441) at Se 18th Terr RoundaboutModify Intersection$511$0$1,862$0$0$2,373$0$04178785SR 29 from Collier County Line to CR 832 (keri Rd)Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$13$0$0$0$0$13$0$04178789SR 29 from Whidden Rd (CR 731) to Bermont Rd (CR 74)Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$2,050$0$0$0$0$0$2,0504178786SR 29 from Bermont Rd (CR 74) to US 27Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$5,275$0$0$0$0$0$5,2754178788SR 29 from Cowboy Way (CR 80a) to Whidden Rd (CR 731)Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$18$20$0$120$3,188$18$0$3,3284178787SR 29 from CR 832 (keri Rd) to F RdAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$33$0$0$0$0$33$0$04175405SR 29 from CR 846 E to N. of New Market Road N.Add 2 to Build 6 Lanes$0$6,310$0$0$0$6,310$0$04178783SR 29 from F Road to Cowboy WayAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$2,828$5,174$50$0$0$729$0$7,3224344901SR 29 from I-75 to Oil Well RdProject Dev. & Env.$47$0$0$0$0$47$0$04175406SR 29 from N. of New Market Rd N. Road to SR 82Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$4,830$0$0$0$4,830$0$04175404SR 29 from S. of Agriculture Way to CR 846 EAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$4,075$0$0$0$4,075$0$04178782SR 29 from SR 82 to CR 80-aProject Dev. & Env.$10$0$0$0$0$10$0$04178784SR 29 from SR 82 to Hendry County LineAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$45$0$400$723$0$45$0$1,1234175403SR 29 from Sunniland Nursery Road to S. of Agriculture WayAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$3,625$0$0$0$3,625$0$04345091SR 60 at Bailey RdModify Intersection$19$0$0$0$0$19$0$04338562SR 60 from CR 630 to Grape Hammock RdAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$0$0$0$7,350$0$0$0$7,3504338563SR 60 from Grape Hammock Road to Osceola County LineAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$0$0$350$0$0$0$3504332011SR 64 at North Olivia DriveAdd Turn Lane$375$0$0$0$0$375$0$04349861SR 64 at US 27Modify Intersection$14,157$0$0$0$0$14$0$14,1434145062SR 70 from Lorraine Rd to CR 675/waterbury RoadProject Dev. & Env.$241$1,771$2,053$0$0$4,066$0$04193445SR 710 from Sherman Wood Ranches to CR 714 (martin C/l)Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$0$0$0$6,500$0$0$6,5004193443SR 710 from US 441 to L-63 CanalNew Road$90$2,064$4,941$3,270$0$10,365$0$04331751SR 82 (immokalee Rd) at CR 850 (corkscrew Rd)Add Turn Lane$100$0$0$0$0$100$0$04258413SR 82 from Alabama Road S to Homestead Road SAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$44,483$0$0$2,050$0$29,175$300$17,0584258411SR 82 from CR 884 (lee Blvd) to Shawnee RoadAdd 4 to Build 6 Lanes$1,346$0$0$2,500$0$257$242$3,3474308491SR 82 from Gator Slough Lane to SR 29Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$1,328$35,685$0$0$0$1,531$500$34,9814308481SR 82 from Hendry County Line to Gator Slough LaneAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$5$2,882$314$0$0$3,200$0$04258414SR 82 from Homestead Road S to Hendry C/lAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$24,796$0$0$950$0$25,446$300$04258412SR 82 from Shawnee Road to Alabama Road SAdd 4 to Build 6 Lanes$54$0$0$0$30,294$836$300$29,2134192432SR25 (US 27) from Highlands County Line to CR 630aAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$42$0$0$350$4,047$42$0$4,3974350631US 27 at East Phoenix StAdd Turn Lane$6$130$0$0$0$135$0$04192434US 27 at SR 60Modify Interchange$1,330$3,006$57,602$0$0$54,603$0$7,3354192433US 27 from CR 630a to Presidents DriveAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$48$0$0$2,534$70$117$0$2,5344192431US 27 from Highlands C/l to N of SR 60Project Dev. & Env.$18$0$0$0$0$18$0$04332051US 441 at Ne 102nd StreetAdd Turn Lane$2$355$0$0$0$357$0$0ANNUAL TOTALS$91,945$77,252$68,479$20,197$44,099$154,021$1,642$146,306All Values in Thousands of "As Programmed" DollarsPE - Preliminary Engineering;ROW - Right-of-Way;PD&E - Project Development & Environmental;TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS include all funds that start with LF fund code;CON - Construction & Support (may Include Grants);ENV - Environmental Mitigation;1708.A.1Packet Pg. 288Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
27
17
4
27
27
75
17
75
75
275
441
De Soto
Charlotte
Lee
4145062
4345091
4349861
4389021
4192431
4192433
4192434
4338562
43385634192432
4332011
4350631
4332051 4193443
4193445
4365631
4178786
4178789
4258414
4258411
4258412
4258413
4331751
4344901
4175403
4175404
4175405
4178788
4178783
4178787
4308491
4308481
4178782
4175406
4178784
4178785
29
82
80
70 70
6060
64
70
29
710
Polk
Collier
Hendry
Glades
HighlandsHardee
Manatee Okeechobee
Sarasota
First Five YearsDISTRICT 1
Non-Interstate Plan
LEGEND
Projects color coded by highest project phase.
Some projects may overlap on map.
Project costs are subject to change.
NOTES
Capacity Improvement Projects
STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM
Adopted Work Program
0 20 4010
Miles
HIGHWAY
FY 2017/2018 through FY 2021/2022(as of July 1, 2017)
Project Phase
Project Development & Environment
Preliminary Engineering
Right-Of-Way
Construction
Environmental Mitigation
171
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
FY 2022/2023 through FY 2026/202 7
FY 2026/2027 2022/2023
Multi-Modal
Strategic Intermodal System Funding Strategy
Capacity Projects on the Strategic Intermodal System
State of Florida Department of Transportation
Second Five Year Plan
172
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
First Five Year Plan*
The First Five Year Plan illustrates projects on the SIS that
are funded by the Legislature in the Work Program
(Year 1) and projects that are programmed for proposed
funding in the next 2 to 5 years.
Update Cycle: Adopted annually by the
FDOT Secretary, effective July 1st each
year with the start of the new fiscal year.
*SIS Capacity Projects included in the
Adopted Five-Year Work Program
Cost Feasible Plan
The Cost Feasible Plan illustrates projects on the SIS that are considered financially feasible
during the last fifteen years (years 11 to 25) of the SIS Funding Strategy, based on current revenue
forecasts. Projects in this plan could move forward into the Second Five as funds become available or
backwards into the Unfunded Needs Plan if revenues fall short of projections.
Update Cycle: Typically updated every 2 to 3 years as new revenue forecasts become available.
Second Five Year Plan
The FDOT Systems Planning Office produces a document set known as the SIS Funding Strategy, which includes three
inter-related sequential documents that identify potential Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Capacity Improvement projects in
various stages of development. All of the projects identified within the SIS Funding Strategy are considered financially feasible
for implementation within the next 25 year period. The Florida Legislature established the SIS in 2003 to enhance Florida’s
economic prosperity and competitiveness. The system encompasses transportation facilities of statewide and interregional
significance, and is focused on the efficient movement of passengers and freight. The combined document set, as illustrated
below, illustrates projects that are funded (Year 1), programmed for proposed funding (Years 2 through 5), planned to be
funded (Years 6 through 10), and considered financially feasible based on projected State revenues (Years 11 through 25).
Typically updated
annually, usually in late summer
following the First Five Plan update.
The Second Five Year Plan illustrates projects that are
planned to be funded in the five years (Years 6 through
beyond the Adopted Work ProgramH[FOXGLQJ 7XUQSLNH
3URMHFWVLQWKLVplan could move IRUZDUG LQWRWKH
)LUVW)LYH<HDUPlan as funds become available.
Update Cycle:
173
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
MAP IDDESCRIPTIONTOTALDISTRICTMANAGED20232024202520262027FACILITYTOTALLOCALFUNDSTOTALSTATEMANAGEDDistrict 1 SIS Plan ENV PD&E PE ROW CON2012144I-4 SR 570 (POLK PKWY) TO US 27Project Dev. & Env.$0$4,020$0$0$0$0$0$4,0202012775I-75 (SR93) AT BEE RIDGE ROADModify Interchange$5,020$0$0$146,845$0$0$0$151,8654206132I-75 AT FRUITVILLE ROAD/CR 780Modify Interchange$0$103,893$0$0$0$0$0$103,8932012773I-75 AT SR 72Modify Interchange$73,031$0$0$0$0$808$0$72,2234178785SR 29 FROM COLLIER COUNTY LINE TO CR 832 (KERI RD)Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$0$0$3,811$4,798$0$0$0$8,6094178788SR 29 FROM COWBOY WAY (CR 80A) TO WHIDDEN RD (CR 731)Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$3,632$0$0$0$0$0$0$3,6324178787SR 29 FROM CR 832 (KERI RD) TO F RDAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$4,435$91$0$0$0$91$0$4,4354175406SR 29 FROM N. OF NEW MARKET RD N. ROAD TO SR 82Add 2 to Build 4 Lanes$380$0$0$0$0$380$0$04175404SR 29 FROM S. OF AGRICULTURE WAY TO CR 846 EAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$370$0$0$0$0$370$0$04178784SR 29 FROM SR 82 TO HENDRY COUNTY LINEAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$9,587$0$0$0$0$0$0$9,5874175403SR 29 FROM SUNNILAND NURSERY ROAD TO S. OF AGRICULTURE WAYAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$500$0$0$0$0$500$0$04193444SR 710 FROM E OF L-63 CANAL TO SHERMAN WOOD RANCHESAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$3,250$250$8,761$0$0$250$0$12,0114193443SR 710 FROM US 441 TO L-63 CANALNew Road$0$0$0$75,080$0$0$0$75,0804308481SR 82 FROM HENDRY COUNTY LINE TO GATOR SLOUGH LANEAdd 2 to Build 4 Lanes$77,612$0$0$0$0$4,224$500$72,8884192432SR25 (US 27) FROM HIGHLANDS COUNTY LINE TO CR 630AAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$0$400$0$120,407$0$0$0$120,8074192433US 27 FROM CR 630A TO PRESIDENTS DRIVEAdd 2 to Build 6 Lanes$0$0$0$80,778$0$0$0$80,778ANNUAL TOTALS$177,817$108,654$12,572$427,908$0$6,623$500$719,828All Values in Thousands of "As Programmed" DollarsPE - Preliminary Engineering;ROW - Right-of-Way;PD&E - Project Development & Environmental;TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS include all funds that start with LF fund code;CON - Construction & Support (may Include Grants);ENV - Environmental Mitigation;1748.A.1Packet Pg. 292Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
"""£¤27£¤17§¨¦4£¤27£¤27§¨¦75§¨¦75§¨¦75§¨¦275£¤441£¤172012144417878820127754178787430848141924334192432419344341934444175403417540441787844175406417878520127734206132AB80AB80AB70AB70AB82AB29AB60AB64AB70AB29AB710§¨¦75§¨¦75PolkCollierLeeHendryGladesHighlandsHardeeManateeDe SotoOkeechobeeSarasotaCharlotte®LEGENDProjects color coded by highest project phase.Some projects may overlap on map. Project costs are subject to change.NOTESCapacity Improvement ProjectsSTRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEMFY 2022/2023 through FY 2026/2027(as of July 1, 2017)Approved Plan0204010MilesDISTRICT 1Second Five YearsHIGHWAYProject PhaseProject Development & EnvironmentPreliminary EngineeringRight-Of-WayConstructionEnvironmental Mitigation1758.A.1Packet Pg. 293Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Year of Expenditure
20132015
176
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM
COST FEASIBLE PLAN 2024-2040
State of Florida Department of Transportation2015 Edition Page 1
Design
PEPDE
State Managed FundsIDFACILITYFROMTO IMPRV
TYPEROWCONTOTAL
Other Funds
ROW CON TOTAL TOTAL
District Managed Funds
ROW CON
Project Phasing
PDE PE
State Managed P3 Funds
#YrsBegin YrCOSTTOTAL
District 1
0 0909I-75 at Fruitville Rd 35,693081,088 81,088 0 M-INCH B B035,6930
0 01248SR 82 Homestead Rd S Hendry C/L 0029,484 29,484 0 A4-6 B B000
0 01256SR 29 Collier C/L CR 832 (Keri Rd)11,716000 0 A2-4 B B N011,7160
0 01257SR 29 CR 832 (Keri Rd)Spencer 3,790000 0 A2-4 B B N03,7900
0 01258SR 29 Spencer N of Cowboy Way 0038,110 38,110 0 A2-4 B B000
0 01259SR 710 US 441 L-63 Canal 0041,825 41,825 0 NR B000
0 01287I-75 at Bee Ridge Rd 72,980000 0 M-INCH A B72,98000
0 01288I-75 at SR 72 (Clark Rd)0098,853 98,853 0 M-INCH B000
0 01385SR 29 Bermont Rd (CR 74)US 27 1,900000 0 A2-4 A B N01,9000
0 01392US 27 CR 630A Presidents Dr 0049,968 49,968 0 A2-6 A B B000
0 01383SR 29 CR 80-A (Cowboy Way)Whidden Rd (CR 731)00170,567 170,567 0 A2-4 A B C000
0 01387I-75 at SR 951 76,348000 0 M-INCH C76,34800
0 01391US 27 Highlands C/L CR 630A 0085,475 85,475 0 A2-6 A B C000
0 3,8661689I-4 North Socrum Loop Road SR 570 (Polk Pkwy)1,262,201000 0 A4-SUL B C1,262,20103,866
1,077 1,031969US 17 Copley Drive N of CR 74 (Bermont Rd)0000 0 A2-6 D D N N002,108
0 6,1861379SR 29 I-75 Oil Well Rd 03,630 0 3,630 0 A2-4 D D D N006,186
0 4,1241386SR 70 Jefferson Ave CR 29 0000 0 A2-4 D N N004,124
0 1,6751403I-4 SR 570 (Polk Pkwy)US 27 (SR 25)00645,421 645,421 0 A4-SUL B D001,675
0 8,7641589SR 70 Lorraine Rd Singletary Rd (Myakka City)0000 0 A2-4 D D N N008,764
3,093 10,8261590SR 70 Singletary Rd (Myakka City)American Legion Dr (Arcadia)0000 0 A2-4 D D N N0013,919
5,155 18,4551591SR 70 American Legion Dr (Arcadia)Jefferson Ave 0000 0 A2-4 D D N N0023,610
5,155 18,5581592SR 70 CR 29 US 98 (Eagle Bay Dr)0000 0 A2-4 D D N N0023,713
0 4,6401593SR 60 CR 630 Kissimmee River Bridge 0000 0 A2-4 D D N N004,640
0 2,5781688I-4 SR570 (Polk Pkwy)North Socrum Loop Road 973,070000 0 A4-SUL B D973,07002,578
2,437,698Funded CFP Totals 1,244,42195,183
LEGEND NOTES
FY 2025/2026 - 2029/2030
FY 2030/2031 - 2034/2035
FY 2035/2036 - 2039/2040
A2-4: Add 2 Lanes to Build 4
A2-6: Add 2 Lanes to Build 6
A2-8: Add 2 Lanes to Build 8
A4-6: Add 4 Lanes to Build 6
A2-SUL: Add 2 Special Use Lanes
A4-SUL: Add 4 Special Use Lanes
M-INCH: Modify Interchange
MCON: Modify Connector
BRIDGE: Bridge
IMPROVEMENT TYPES
UP: Ultimate Improvement
N-INCH: New Interchange
MGLANE: Managed Lanes
NR: New Road
Mega Projects Phased Over Time
Unfunded Needs Plan
Programmed, Planned, or Completed
FY 2027/2028 - 1.430
FY 2032/2033 - 1.683
FY 2037/2038 - 1.979
INFLATION FACTORS (1) Values in thousands of dollars in the year of expenditure, inflated to the middle year in each band.
(2) All phase costs shown as supplied by each District.
(3) CON includes both Construction (CON52) and Construction Support (CEI).
(4) ROW includes both Right-of-Way Acquisition/Mitigation (ROW43/45) and Right-of-Way Support.
(5) Project costs are subject to change.
(6) Revenue forecast provides separate values for PDE and PE than for ROW and CON. Therefore
these phases have been separated in this table.
(7) Other Funds- assumed to be toll revenue or partner funded.
(8) Project Phasing- "COMP"- project underway or complete.
177
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
I-75 at Fruitville Rd.
909 M-INCH
I-75 at SR 72 (Clark Rd.)
1288 M-INCH
I-75 at Bee Ridge Rd.
1287 M-INCH
SR 70 Lorraine Rd.Singletary Rd.
1589 A2-4
SR 70 Singletary Rd.American Legion Dr.
1590 A2-4
SR 70 Jefferson Ave.CR 29
1386 A2-4
SR 70 American Legion Rd.Jefferson Ave.
1591 A2-4
SR 70 CR 29US 98
1592 A2-4
I-75 at SR 951
1387 M-INCH
SR 29 CR 832 (Keri Rd.)Spencer
1257 A2-4
SR 29 Collier County LineCR 832 (Keri Rd.)
1256 A2-4
SR 29 Bermont Rd. (CR 74)US 27
1385 A2-4
SR 29 CR 80-A (Cowboy Way)Whidden Rd. (CR 731)
1383 A2-4
SR 29 SpencerN of Cowboy Way
1258 A2-4
SR 29 I-75Oil Well Rd.
1379 A2-4
US 27 Highlands County LineCR 630A
1391 A2-6
US 27 CR 630APresidents Dr.
1392 A2-6
SR 60 CR 630Kissimmee River Bridge
1593 A2-4
I-4 SR 570 (Polk Pkwy)US 98
1403 A4-SUL
I-4 US 98SR 570 (Polk Pkwy.)
1688 A4-SUL
I-4 SR 570 (Polk Pkwy.)US 27 (SR 25)
1689 A4-SUL
US 17 Copley Dr.N of CR 74
969 A2-6
SR 710 US 441L-63 Canal
1259 NR
SR 82 Homestead Rd. S.Hendry County Line
1248 A4-6
Strategic Intermodal System
IMPROVEMENT TYPE
A2-4 - Add 2 Lanes to Build 4
A2-6 - Add 2 Lanes to Build 6
2040 Cost Feasible Plan
SIS Highways
Other State Highways
Urban Areas
OTHER FEATURES
SR 40 SR 326 (Silver Springs)CR 314
934 A2-4Project ID
Facility
Improvement Type
Limits
PROJECT LABELS
A4-6 - Add 4 Lanes to Build 6
23
7 5
1 4
6
0 5 10 20 miles
District 1
A4-SUL - Add 4 Special Use Lanes
M-INCH - Modify Interchange
NR - New Road
State of Florida Department of Transportation2015 Edition Page 2
STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM
COST FEASIBLE PLAN 2024-2040 District 1
1591 15921386
1590
1589
1391
1392 1593
1403 1688
1689
12561248
969
1259
1379
1387
1257
909
1288
DESOTO
HARDEE
MANATEE
POLK
HIGHLANDS
GLADES
OKEECHOBEE
CHARLOTTE
LEE
COLLIER
SARASOTA
1287
1383
1385
HENDRY
1258
75
70 17
70
60
64
80
75
29
27
27
4
82
178
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
APPENDIX B COLLIER COUNTY AND LEE COUNTY REGIONAL NETWORK MAPS Includes Collier-Lee Bi-County Regional Roadway Network 1798.A.1Packet Pg. 297Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
XY
XY
SWFIA
Sanibel-
C
a
p
t
i
v
a
R
dStr
i
n
g
f
e
l
l
ow
R
d
SR 78Burnt Store RdCape Coral PkwyChiquita BlvdDiplomat Pkwy
SR 78
Santa Barbara BlvdDel Prado BlvdU
S
4
1
B
u
s
.
4
1
Hancock Pkwy SR 80US 41Metro PkwySR 82Ortiz AveI-75Daniels Pkwy
SR 82SR 867Corkscrew Rd
Alico RdSummerlin RdBonita Bch RdUS 41Three Oaks PkwyThree Oaks PkwyVanderbilt DrOld 41I-7
5
Immokalee Rd
Oil Well Rd SR 29Immokalee Rd
US 41Airport - Pulling RdLivingston RdI-75
Davis Blvd Santa Barbara BlvdI-75
US 41San Marco DrSR 29ProposedAlico-Green MeadowsConnector
ProposedThree OaksExt
ProposedLogan BlvdExt
RosaParksIntermodal Center
FGCU
AveMaria Camp Keais RdEverglades BlvdCamp Keais Rd & Everglades BlvdAre Not in the Federal Aid SystemCAT Creekside Transfer Center
CAT OperationsFacilityCATTransfer Center
Golden Gate Pkwy
Pine Ridge RdCollier BlvdSR 951CR 864
Proposed VeteransMemorial Blvd
Hanson Ext
Legend
XY SIS Hubs
Proposed Interstate Interchange
Existing Regional Facility
Programmed Regional Facility
Planned Regional Facility
Major Roads
COLLIER-LEEREGIONAL ROADWAY NETWORK
Created: Brian Raimondo 2.9.2018C:\Regional Networks\(GIS) Regional Network 2011\Reg_HighwaySource: Collier-Lee MPOs
4
0 5 102.5 Miles
AMENDED: COLLIER MPO MAY 12, 2017 -- LEE COUNTY MPO MAY 19, 2017
180
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
APPENDIX C AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMSINCLUDES: EVERGLADES AIRPARK IMMOKALEE REGIONAL AIRPORT MARCO ISLAND AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT The Naples and Collier County Airport Authorities develop annual aviation project priorities. These project priorities are listed in their Joint Airport Capital Improvement Programs. (JACIP) and capital improvement plans for each of the airports within the Collier MPO planning area. These programs and plans have been coordinated with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 1818.A.1Packet Pg. 299Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
AIRPORT SPONSOR REQUESTED FUNDING -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUMMARY Page 1 of 23/29/2018
Local ID:Everglades Airpark
Collier County Airport Authority
12-0021
03182.*A
Airport:
Sponsor:Sponsor ID:
NPIAS No.:
Site No.:
X01
MKY
Sponsor Sponsor YearProject Description:
Sponsor Requested Funding Breakdown
Federal State Local
PFL0003358 441671 1 6 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,900,000
Reconstruct and widen Runway 15/33
$1,800,000 $0 $100,000
PFL0004526 3 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$421,052
Environmental Assessment for reconstruction and widening of Runway 15/33
$400,000 $10,526 $10,526
PFL0008822 441671 1 5 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$40,000
Design, Permit, and Bid Runway Reconstruction and Widening
$0 $40,000 $0
PFL0010946 441815 1 1 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,200,000
Design, permit, bid and construct Seaplane Base
$0 $960,000 $240,000
2018Yearly Total $3,561,052$2,200,000 $1,010,526 $350,526
PFL0003358 441671 1 6 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$100,000
Reconstruct and widen Runway 15/33
$0 $100,000 $0
PFL0010198 2 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$200,000
Airport Master Plan Update
$180,000 $10,000 $10,000
2019Yearly Total $300,000$180,000 $110,000 $10,000
PFL0008819 7 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$90,000
Install VASI System
$85,500 $2,250 $2,250
2020Yearly Total $90,000$85,500 $2,250 $2,250
PFL0008818 8 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,237,500
Land Acquisition
$1,125,000 $56,250 $56,250
PFL0008820 9 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$400,000
Design, Permit, Bid and Construct Apron
$150,000 $192,500 $57,500
2021Yearly Total $1,637,500$1,275,000 $248,750 $113,750
182
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PFL0008311 10 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$500,000
Design, Permit, Construct T-Hangar
$0 $400,000 $100,000
2022Yearly Total $500,000$0 $400,000 $100,000
183
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
AIRPORT SPONSOR REQUESTED FUNDING -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUMMARY Page 1 of 23/29/2018
Local ID:Immokalee Regional Airport
Collier County Airport Authority
12-0031
03245.*A
Airport:
Sponsor:Sponsor ID:
NPIAS No.:
Site No.:
IMM
MKY
Sponsor Sponsor YearProject Description:
Sponsor Requested Funding Breakdown
Federal State Local
PFL0008323 9 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,025,000
Design, Permit, Construct Aircraft Storage Hangars
$0 $0 $1,025,000
PFL0009405 438977 1 6 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$750,000
Rehabilitate Runway 18/36
$0 $0 $750,000
PFL0009406 7 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$230,000
Design, Permit and Bid Extension of Taxiway C, and conversion of Taxiway A to Perimeter Road
$207,000 $11,500 $11,500
PFL0011323 5 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$240,000
Design Rehabilitation of Runway 18/36
$0 $240,000 $0
PFL0011426 4 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$116,000
Purchase 1000 gallon AVGAS (100LL) Refueler
$0 $92,800 $23,200
2018Yearly Total $2,361,000$207,000 $344,300 $1,809,700
PFL0003510 8 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$2,237,000
Construct Extension of Taxiway C and Removal/Conversion of Taxiway A
$2,013,300 $111,850 $111,850
PFL0004214 12 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$750,000
Construct T-Hangars
$0 $375,000 $375,000
PFL0005823 14 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$100,000
EIS for Runway Extension
$95,000 $2,500 $2,500
PFL0008317 13 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$100,000
Design Airpark Boulevard Extension
$0 $80,000 $20,000
PFL0008318 9 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$50,000
Design Airport Maintenance and Operations Building
$47,500 $1,250 $1,250
PFL0008323 9 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,025,000
Design, Permit, Construct Aircraft Storage Hangars
$0 $1,025,000 $0
184
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PFL0009404 433632 1 10 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$250,000
Terminal Building and Airside Security Updates and Additions
$0 $200,000 $50,000
PFL0009405 438977 1 6 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$3,000,000
Rehabilitate Runway 18/36
$0 $3,000,000 $0
PFL0009407 434815 1 11 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,500,000
Enhanced Gate Access Control/Monitoring and Arifield Perimeter Fencing and Airport Fiber Connection
$1,200,000 $150,000 $150,000
2019Yearly Total $9,012,000$3,355,800 $4,945,600 $710,600
PFL0003877 15 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,500,000
Land acquisition for runway extension (103 acres)
$1,425,000 $37,500 $37,500
PFL0008320 16 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,500,000
Construct Airport Maintenance and Operations Building
$0 $1,200,000 $300,000
PFL0008321 17 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$4,500,000
Construct Airpark Boulevard Extension
$0 $3,600,000 $900,000
2020Yearly Total $7,500,000$1,425,000 $4,837,500 $1,237,500
PFL0005824 21 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$100,000
Conceptual ERP for Tower
$95,000 $0 $5,000
PFL0008315 18 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$415,000
Design and permit construction of extension of runway 09/27 and Taxiway B
$394,250 $10,375 $10,375
2021Yearly Total $515,000$489,250 $10,375 $15,375
PFL0005828 19 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$9,000,000
Construct Runway Extension 9/27/Extend Taxiway B
$8,550,000 $225,000 $225,000
PFL0008316 22 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$75,000
Design and permit air traffic control tower
$71,250 $1,875 $1,875
PFL0008325 20 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,500,000
Instrument Landing System - Runway 9/27
$1,425,000 $37,500 $37,500
2022Yearly Total $10,575,000$10,046,250 $264,375 $264,375
185
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
AIRPORT SPONSOR REQUESTED FUNDING -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUMMARY Page 1 of 13/29/2018
Local ID:Marco Island Airport
Collier County Airport Authority
12-0142
03315.44*A
Airport:
Sponsor:Sponsor ID:
NPIAS No.:
Site No.:
MKY
MKY
Sponsor Sponsor YearProject Description:
Sponsor Requested Funding Breakdown
Federal State Local
PFL0005820 437063 1 2 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$6,000,000
Construct New Terminal, Auto Parking, Airport Entrance and Aircraft Apron
$4,000,000 $0 $2,000,000
2018Yearly Total $6,000,000$4,000,000 $0 $2,000,000
PFL0005820 437063 1 2 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$8,000,000
Construct New Terminal, Auto Parking, Airport Entrance and Aircraft Apron
$0 $8,000,000 $0
PFL0009401 8 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$300,000
Preliminary Planning and Design of Air Traffic Control Tower
$285,000 $7,500 $7,500
PFL0011428 7 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,200,000
Construct Apron Expansion
$1,080,000 $60,000 $60,000
2019Yearly Total $9,500,000$1,365,000 $8,067,500 $67,500
PFL0006538 9 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$2,525,000
Construct ATCT
$2,398,750 $63,125 $63,125
PFL0010945 3 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,500,000
Design, permit, and Construct Aircraft T-Hangars
$0 $1,200,000 $300,000
2020Yearly Total $4,025,000$2,398,750 $1,263,125 $363,125
186
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
AIRPORT SPONSOR REQUESTED FUNDING -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUMMARY Page 1 of 32/5/2018
Local ID:Naples Municipal Airport
City of Naples Airport Authority
12-0053
03379.*A
Airport:
Sponsor:Sponsor ID:
NPIAS No.:
Site No.:
APF
APF
Sponsor Sponsor YearProject Description:
Sponsor Requested Funding Breakdown
Federal State Local
PFL0009408 8 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$75,000
Off-Airport Obstruction Removal
$0 $37,500 $37,500
PFL0009409 6 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$500,000
East Quad Apron Expansion,Aviation Dr South and Utility Realignment Project
$0 $400,000 $100,000
PFL0010182 440308 1 1 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$2,500,000
Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Building
$0 $2,000,000 $500,000
PFL0010582 7 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$285,000
Replace Bi-Fold Hangar Doors
$0 $0 $285,000
PFL0010588 5 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$350,000
GA Terminal Traffic and Parking Improvements and Entrance Road Rehabilitation
$0 $280,000 $70,000
PFL0010589 10 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$250,000
Berm Removal / Drainage Improvements
$0 $0 $250,000
PFL0011418 12 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$2,500,000
North Quadrant Landfill Reclamation
$0 $2,000,000 $500,000
PFL0011652 3 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,500,000
Commercial Terminal Apron Rehabilitation
$0 $1,200,000 $300,000
PFL0011684 9 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$2,500,000
South Quadrant T Hangars
$0 $2,000,000 $500,000
PFL0011715 441675 1 2 2018UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,000,000
Airport Security Upgrade
$0 $800,000 $200,000
2018Yearly Total $11,460,000$0 $8,717,500 $2,742,500
PFL0008813 13 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$6,200,000
Commercial Terminal Upgrades and Parking Lot Rehab - Phase I
$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $4,200,000
187
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PFL0009408 8 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$75,000
Off-Airport Obstruction Removal
$0 $37,500 $37,500
PFL0009409 6 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$3,800,000
East Quad Apron Expansion,Aviation Dr South and Utility Realignment Project
$0 $3,040,000 $760,000
PFL0010582 7 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$285,000
Replace Bi-Fold Hangar Doors
$0 $0 $285,000
PFL0010588 5 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,400,000
GA Terminal Traffic and Parking Improvements and Entrance Road Rehabilitation
$0 $1,120,000 $280,000
PFL0011653 4 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,500,000
South GA Apron Rehabilitation
$0 $1,200,000 $300,000
PFL0011685 9 2019UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$1,750,000
South Quadrant Hangar Development
$0 $1,400,000 $350,000
2019Yearly Total $15,010,000$1,000,000 $7,797,500 $6,212,500
PFL0008814 14 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$6,500,000
Commercial Terminal Expansion - Phase II
$2,000,000 $500,000 $4,000,000
PFL0009408 8 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$75,000
Off-Airport Obstruction Removal
$0 $37,500 $37,500
PFL0011686 441765 1 15 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$3,000,000
Runway 5-23 Drainage Swale Improvements
$2,700,000 $150,000 $150,000
PFL0011811 21 2020UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$500,000
Fence Replacement
$0 $0 $500,000
2020Yearly Total $10,075,000$4,700,000 $687,500 $4,687,500
PFL0009408 8 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$75,000
Off-Airport Obstruction Removal
$0 $37,500 $37,500
PFL0011806 20 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$6,000,000
West Quadrant Development Project
$0 $0 $6,000,000
PFL0011811 21 2021UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$500,000
Fence Replacement
$0 $0 $500,000
2021Yearly Total $6,575,000$0 $37,500 $6,537,500
188
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
PFL0009408 8 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$75,000
Off-Airport Obstruction Removal
$0 $37,500 $37,500
PFL0011811 21 2022UPIN:FDOT Item No.:$500,000
Fence Replacement
$0 $0 $500,000
2022Yearly Total $575,000$0 $37,500 $537,500
189
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
APPENDIX D ACRONYMS1908.A.1Packet Pg. 308Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Acronym DescriptionAcronym2 Description2ADA Americans with Disabilities ActJARC Job Access and Reverse CommuteAUIR Annual Update and Inventory ReportLCB Local Coordinating BoardBCC/BOCC Board of County CommissionersLRTP Long Range Transportation PlanBPAC Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory CommitteeMAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st CenturyBPMP Bicycle & Pedestrian Master PlanMPA Metropolitan Planning AreaBRT Bus Rapid TransitMPO Metropolitan Planning OrganizationCAT Collier Area TransitNHS National Highway SystemCEI Construction Engineering InspectionOA Other ArterialCFR Code of Federal RegulationsOPS OperationsCAC Citizens Advisory CommitteePD&E Project Development and EnvironmentalCIGP County Incentive Grant ProgramPEPreliminary EngineeringCMC Congestion Managament CommitteePTO Public Transportation OrganizationCMP Congestion Managament ProcessRACEC Rural Area of Critical Economic ConcernCMS Congestion Management SystemROW Right of WayCOA Comprehensive Operational AnalysisRRU Railroad/UtilitiesCR County RoadSASurface Transportation Program - Any AreaCST Construction SE, TE Surface Transportation Program - EnhancementCTC Community Transportation CoordinatorSHS State Highway SystemCTD Commissioner for the Transportation Disadvantaged SIS Strategic Intermodal SystemCTST Community Traffic Safety TeamSR State RoadDSB Design BuildSRTS, SR2S Safe Routes to SchoolEIS Environmental Impact StudySTIP State Transportation Improvement ProgramEMO Environmental Management OfficeSTP Surface Transportation ProgramENG EngineeringSU, XUSurface Transportation Funds for Urbanized Area formula based - population over 200,000ENV EnvironmentalTAC Technical Advisory CommitteeFAA Federal Aviation AdministrationTAP Transportation Alternative ProgramFDOT Florida Department of TransportationTDTransportation DisadvantagedFHWA Federal Highway AdministrationTDTF Transportation Disadvantaged Trust FundFM Financial ManagementTDP Transit Development PlanFPN Financial Project NumberTDSP Transportation Disadvantaged Service PlanF.S. Florida StatuteTIP Transportation Improvement ProgramFTA Federal Transit AdministrationTMA Transportation Management AreaFY Fiscal YearTRIP Transportation Regional Incentive ProgramHSIP Highway Safety Improvement ProgramTSM Transporation System ManagementHWY HighwayUPWP Unified Planning Work ProgramIInterstateUZA Urbanized AreaINC Incentive ContractorYOE Year of ExpenditureITS Intelligent Transportation SystemJACIP Joint Airport Capital Improvement ProgramAcronyms that are used in this Transportation Improvement Program 1918.A.1Packet Pg. 309Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
APPENDIX E FUNDING CODES1928.A.1Packet Pg. 310Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
FUNDING CODES REFERENCED IN THIS TIP SOURCE CODE DESCRIPTION Federal ACNP ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION NHPP Federal ACSU ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SU) Federal ACTA ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION TALT State BNIR INTRASTATE R/W & BRIDGE BONDS State BR NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION State BRRP STATE BRIDGE REPAIR & REHAB State CIGP COUNTY INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM State D UNRESTRICTED STATE PRIMARY State DDR DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State DI ST. S/W INTER/INTRASTATE HWY State DIH STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State DPTO STATE - PTO State DS STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State DSB2 EVERGLADES PKY/ALLIGATOR ALLEY State DU STATE PRIMARY/FEDERAL REIMB Federal FAA FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN Federal FTA FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION Federal FTAT FHWA TRANSFER TO FTA (NON-BUD) State HSP SAFETY (HIWAY SAFETY PROGRAM) Local LF LOCAL FUNDS Local LFP LOCAL FUNDS FOR PARTICIPATING Federal PL METRO PLAN (85% FA; 15% OTHER) Federal REPE REPURPOSED FEDERAL EARMARKS Federal SA STP ANY AREA State SIWR 2015 SB2514A-STRATEGIC INT SYS Federal SR2T SAFE ROUTES - TRANSFER Federal SU STP URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal TALT TRANSPORTATION ALTS- ANY AREA Federal TALU TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K 1938.A.1Packet Pg. 311Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
APPENDIX F COLLIER MPO’S LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) COST FEASIBLE PLAN (HGHWAY AND TRANSIT) To view the entire Collier 2040 LRTP please visit: http://colliermpo.com/index.aspx?page=187 1948.A.1Packet Pg. 312Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan – Cost Feasible Plan Part I 2021-2040 PE ROW CST PE ROW CST PE ROW CST Project Totals 43 SR 29North of SR 82Collier/Hendry Line22.42‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$7.89$10.02$10.0260 SR 29I‐75 (SR 93) Oil Well Rd 2 10.22‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)n/a$6.19 $3.63$9.824I‐75Collier Blvd (CR 951)Interchange, Single Point Urban$41.40$55.87$55.87TMA BOX (20%) Bridgesn/a$4.66$4.66$9.34 $18.66TMA BOX (40%) Pathways (Bike/Ped)n/a$9.32$9.32$18.67 $37.31TMA BOX (40%) CMPn/a$9.32$9.32$18.67 $37.312Golden Gate ParkwayI‐75(New) 2‐Lane Ramp$2.00 $0.59 $2.54$3.133Pine Ridge RdI‐75Intersection Traffic Signalization$5.00 $0.80 $6.35$7.157Immokalee RdI‐75 interchangeIntersection Traffic Signalization$2.75 $0.51 $3.49$4.0012 Old US 41US 41 (SR 45)Lee/Collier County Line21.52‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$15.03 $2.72$22.55$25.2718 SR 84 (Davis Blvd)Airport Pulling RdSanta Barbara Blvd434‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes , and Curb & Gutter with Inside Paved Shoulder (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$33.11$6.85$77.66$84.5119aCritical Needs Intersection (Randall Blvd at Immokalee Road)Immokalee Road8th StreetInterim At‐Grade Intersection improvements, including 4‐laning to 8th Street;$4.00$5.08$5.0821 US 41Goodlette RdN/A Intersection$2.00 $0.37 $2.54$2.9141 SR 951 (Collier Blvd)South of Manatee RdNorth of Tower Rd414‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$13.35 $2.02$20.03$22.0515 US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East) Greenway Rd 6 L Farm Rd 2 2.62‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Outside Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$21.83$6.01$25.59 $41.70 $73.309US 41 (SR 90) (Tamiami Trail East)Collier Blvd (SR 951)Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) ‐ Mainline Over Crossroad$44.14$10.30$10.305CR 951 (Collier Blvd)Golden Gate CanalGreen Blvd 4 24‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Sidewalk, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$30.00 $3.66 $38.10$41.7619bCritical Needs Intersection (Randall Blvd at Immokalee Road)Immokalee Road8th StreetUltimate intersection improvement$31.00$4.68 $53.48 $58.1614p Vanderbilt Beach RdCR 951 (Collier Blvd)8th St 0 & 26Expand from 0 & 2 lanes to building 3 lanes of a six lane footprint from Collier Blvd to Wilson Blvd and 2 lanes from Wilson to 8th St$59.96 $12.86 $76.15$89.0140 Airport Pulling RdVanderbilt Beach RdImmokalee Rd 4 24‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$5.00 $1.22 $6.35$7.5725 Oil Well Rd/CR 858Everglades BlvdOil Well Grade Rd23.92‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Outside Paved Shoulders (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$20.00$30.00$30.00CST PDC2021-20252026-20302031-2040Table 5 - 2040 Cost Feasible Plan - Summary of Funded Projects Grouped by Funding Source with Costs Shown in Future Year of Expenditure (YOE) in Millions of DollarsCF#FacilityFromTo# ofExistingLProjectLengthProject Type1958.A.1Packet Pg. 313Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan – Cost Feasible Plan Part II 2021-2040 PE ROW CST PE ROW CST PE ROW CST Project Totals 33 Veterans Memorial Blvd Livingston Road US 41 2 2.9 2‐Lane Undivided Roadway with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes and Curb & Gutter $8.00 $1.95 $1.08$12.00$15.0320 Immokalee RdCamp Keais Rd Carver St 2 2.52‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$25.04$5.24 $23.01 $37.56$65.8156 Benfield RoadCity Gate Boulevard Lords Way 0 3.9 2 lane roadway in a 4 lane footprint$56.47 $1.83$20.69$21.21$43.7229 Wilson Boulevard/Black Burn RoadWilson BoulevardEnd of Haul Road02.62 lane roadway in a 4 lane footprint$29.31 $0.61$6.90$30.70$38.2051 Wilson Blvd. Golden Gate Blvd.Immokalee Rd.23.32‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes$23.36 $2.85$21.47$44.63 $68.9473 Little League Rd. Ext.SR‐82 Westclox St. 0 3.7 New 2‐lane roadway$28.02$3.86$17.05 $53.52 $74.42Future County Highway FundsProjects to be determined at a later date$9.12 $3.37$10.47 $26.35$64.17 $17.42 $121.7814p Vanderbilt Beach Road ExtCollier Boulevard8th Street 2 & 06Add remaining 3 lanes$39.97$76.34 $76.3434 Camp Keais RoadImmokalee RoadPope John Paul Blvd.22.62‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Outside Paved Shoulder (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$10.00$2.76$19.10 $21.8636 Vanderbilt Beach RoadAirport Road US 414 2.14‐Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$4.00$3.10$6.00$9.1032 Immokalee Rd (CR 846)SR 29 Airpark Blvd 2 0.42‐Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement)$4.06$3.10$4.69 $7.75 $15.55$636.31 $22.50 $13.93 $229.78 $68.97 $70.83 $151.43 $21.17 $244.70 $360.62 $1,183.93Notes:Revenue Spent RemaininRevenue Spent RemainingRevenue Spent Remainin2021‐2025 2026‐2030Design phases funded by OA not included in totalsTMA$23.32$23.29 $0.03$23.32$23.29 $0.03$46.64$46.69‐$0.05$0.01PE/PD&E 1.219 1.379#56 and #29 are only partial ROW & Mitigation costsOA$55.60$58.10‐$2.50$52.60$42.58 $10.02$115.10$144.95‐$29.85‐$22.33ROW1.44 1.838SIS$65.89$65.89 $0.00$0.00$0.00 $0.00$9.82$9.82 $0.00$0.00CST1.271.5County$106.82$108.26‐$1.44$201.66$212.50‐$10.84$430.84$414.74 $16.10$3.832031-2040# ofExistingLProjectLengthProject TypeCST PDC2021-20252026-20301.5612.3451.91Table 5 - 2040 Cost Feasible Plan - Summary of Funded Projects Grouped by Funding Source with Costs Shown in Future Year of Expenditure (YOE) in Millions of DollarsCF#FacilityFromTo2021‐2025 2026‐2030 2031‐2040Remaining BalanceProject PhaseInflation Factors2031‐20401968.A.1Packet Pg. 314Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Transit Cost Feasible Plan – Service Schedule
197
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
Transit Cost Feasible Plan – Operating and Capital Costs Summary
198
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
APPENDIX G FEDERAL LANDS APPROPRIATIONS (Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division) 1998.A.1Packet Pg. 317Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Federal Lands Highway Program (see 23 US Code §204)
Recognizing the need for all public Federal roads to be treated with a uniform set of policies similar to the policies that
apply to Federal-aid highways; the Federal Lands Highway Program (23 US Code §204) was established with rules that
apply to all public land highways, park roads and parkways, refuge roads, and Native American reservation roads and
bridges. In general, funds made available for these roads shall be used by the Secretary of Transportation and the
Secretary of the appropriate Federal land management agency. Funds may be used for: transportation planning,
research, engineering and construction of highways, roads and parkways; and transit facilities located on public lands,
national parks and Native American reservations. Funds may also be used for operation and maintenance of transit
facilities located on public lands, national parks and Native American reservations.
Eligible projects for each type of Federal land highway include: transportation planning for tourism, recreational travel and
recreational development; adjacent parking areas; interpretive signage; acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or
historical sites; provisions for bicycles and pedestrians; roadside rest areas including sanitary and water facilities; and
other appropriate facilities such as visitor centers. Lastly, a project to build a replacement of the federally owned bridge
over the Hoover Dam is eligible for funding.
In general, funds available for refuge roads may only be used for maintenance and improvement of refuge roads and
associated facilities, and for the administrative costs of these improvements.
Forest Development Roads and Trails (see 23 US Code §205)
Funds available for forest development roads and trails shall be used by the Secretary of Agriculture for construction and
maintenance of eligible roads and trails. In addition, funds may be available for adjacent parking areas and for sanitary,
water and fire control facilities.
Defense Access Roads (see 23 US Code §210)
The Secretary of Transportation is authorized to use funds appropriated for defense access roads for construction,
maintenance and repair of defense access roads (including bridges and tunnels) to military reservations, defense
industries, defense industry sites, and to the sources of raw materials when such roads are deemed important to the
national defense by the Secretary of Defense
200
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Inter-American Highway (see 23 US Code §212)
Funds appropriated for the Inter-American Highway shall be used to enable the United States to cooperate with the
Governments of the American Republics situated in Central America (Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras,
Nicaragua and Panama) to survey and construct the Inter-American Highway. There are matching funds requirements
which may vary between countries.
Public Lands Development Roads and Trails (see 23 US Code §214)
Funds available for public lands development roads and trails shall be used for the construction and improvement of such
roads and trails. Funds may also be used for adjacent parking areas and for sanitary and water facilities.
Territorial Highway Program (see 23 US Code §215)
Recognizing the mutual benefits that will accrue, the Secretary of Transportation may carry out a program to assist
territory governments (American Samoa, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam and the United States
Virgin Islands) in the design, construction, improvement and operation of a system of arterial and collector highways and
necessary inter-island connectors. The Secretary of Transportation may provide technical assistance for highway
planning, environmental evaluations, administration of right-of-way acquisitions, and relocation assistance programs.
In general, territorial highway program funds may only be used for eligible surface transportation projects, cost-effective
preventative maintenance, ferry boats, terminal facilities, engineering, and economic surveys and investigations for
planning and financing future highway programs. There are cost sharing requirements for this program.
Bicycle Transportation and Pedestrian Walkways (see 23 US Code §217)
Subject to the approval of the Secretary of Transportation a State may obligate Surface Transportation Program (STP)
and Congestion Mitigation Program funds for construction of pedestrian walkways, bicycle transportation facilities, and for
carrying out non-construction projects related to safe bicycle use. In addition, and subject to approval of the Secretary of
Transportation, a State may obligate funds for construction of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities
that are on land adjacent of any highway on the National Highway System (NHS).
At the discretion of the department charged with the administration of Federal Lands Highway Funds, funds authorized for
forest highways, forest development roads and trails, public lands development roads and trails, park roads, parkways,
Native American reservation roads and public lands highways may be used for the construction of pedestrian walkways
201
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
and bicycle transportation facilities. Any eligible pedestrian walkway or bicycle transportation facility in this section shall be
deemed a highway project and subject to Federal cost-sharing.
In general, bicycle transportation facilities and pedestrian walkways shall be considered, where appropriate, in conjunction
with all new construction and reconstruction of transportation facilities except for bicycle and pedestrian uses are
prohibited. Transportation plans shall also provide due consideration for safety and contiguous routes for bicyclists and
pedestrians. No bicycle project may be carried out unless it has been determined that such project is primarily for
transportation purposes as opposed to recreational purposes.
202
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Last Printed 19‐Oct‐16PROJECT FY ST COUNTY PARK, REFUGE, FOREST OR OTHER PARTNER/AGENCYDESCRIPTION TYPE OF WORKPRIMARY FUNDING SOURCETOTAL PROGRAMMED AMOUNTFUNDS FROM TITLEDELIVER BYSTATUS CONG. DIST.FLMA REGIONEVER_10(4) 2017 FL Miami‐DadeEverglades National ParkRepair, Mill and Overlay Paving/Main Park Rd‐RT 10LSR_3RLFLTP $2,534,182.00 Title 23 EFLHD In Design FL‐25 NPS_SEFL_FLAP_JKSVL_TRL(1)2017 FL Duval (NPS), Timucuan Ecological and Historic PreserveConstruct 245 foot wooden pedestrain bridge across Cedar Point Creek, Jacksonville, FLMISC FLAP$700,750.00 Title 23 LOCAL In Design FL‐04 NPS_SEFL_FLAP_PNSCL_FER(2)2017 FL Escambia NPS, Gulf Islands National SeashoreConstruction of a floating dock to support a ferry system connecting Pensacola w/ Fort Pickens/GUISMISC FLAP$751,145.00 Title 23 LOCAL In Design FL‐01 NPS_SEFL_FLAP_STPRK_TRL(1)2017 FL Martin Hobe Sound National Wildlife RefugeConstruct 4.5 mile long 12‐foot wide multi‐use trail & safety‐lighted crosswalk in Martin County, FLMISC FLAP $3,135,000.00 Title 23 STATE In Design FL‐18 FWS_R4FL_FLAP_STPRK_TRL(2)2017 FL Martin FWS, Hobe Sound National Wildlife RefugeConstruction of a 1900 foot long multi‐modal path and an overpass across the FEC railwayMISC FLAP $3,135,000.00 Title 23 STATE In Design FL‐18 NPS_SEFW_LOXA_20142461512017 FL Palm BeachAuthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife RefugeRepair Headquarters Boat Ramp parking lot (Route 902).3RL FLTP$350,000.00 Title 23 FWS In Design FL‐20 FWS_R4FW_STMA_20088029012017 FL Waklla St. Marks National Wildlife RefugeReplace failed culverts on SM 408 Road (Route 175).MISC FLTP$42,000.00 Title 23 FWS In Design FL‐20 FWS_R4FW_FLPA_419(1)2019 FL Collier Florida Panther National Wildlife RefugeRehab Fritz Ed (RT 419)3RL FLTP$750,000.00 Title 23 EFLHD Planned FL‐25 FWS_R4FY2017‐FY2020 Transportation Improvement ProgramFederal Highway Administration ‐ Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division ‐ FloridaOnce available, the MPO will update this list via an Administrative Modification2038.A.1Packet Pg. 321Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
APPENDIX H SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS 2048.A.1Packet Pg. 322Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
The MPO conducted a 21-day public comment period for the TIP in accordance with the MPO Public Involvement Plan. The public comment period ran from April 17, 2018 through May 9, 2018 and included:Submittal of a news release giving notice of the public comment period;Hard copy distribution of the Draft TIP and comment forms to local government agency offices and libraries; andPosting of the Draft TIP with electronic and mail-in comment forms to the MPO website, colliermpo.comNo public comments were received on the TIP. All comments received were from governmental agencies including FDOT and FHWA, MPO advisory committee members and the MPO Board. 2058.A.1Packet Pg. 323Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
APPENDIX I CRITERIA USED FOR PROJECT PRIORITIZATION2068.A.1Packet Pg. 324Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
MPO Board Allocation of its Transportation Management Area (TMA) Funds
The MPO Board adopted a temporary suspension of its former allocation formula on March 10, 2017.
The new, temporary policy allocates 100% of its TMA Funds annually for five-years as follows: Year
1 – Pedestrian and Bicycle, Year 2 – Bridges, Year 3, Congestion Management, Year 4 – Pedestrian
and Bicycle, and Year 5 – Congestion Management. The Cost Feasible Plan of the Long Range
Transportation Plan (LRTP) contains a budget line item for these project categories but does not list
individual projects (except for bridge projects) within these categories.
FDOT requires that the TIP includes the MPO’s criteria and process for prioritizing projects. The
questions and criteria used by the MPO to prioritize projects are listed in the tables below. The
question numbers correspond to the committees’ project application forms.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Projects
Pedestrian and bicycle projects were evaluated and ranked based on the 20 questions/criteria listed
in the table below which also shows the LRTP goal that corresponds to the project.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Questions/Criteria and
Associated Long Range Transportation Plan Goal
Question/Criteria Long Range Transportation Plan Goal
Q4 Is the project multijurisdictional? Improve system continuity and connectivity
Q6-7 What is the funding request amount
and cost estimate for the project?
Q10 Does project promote regional
connectivity?
Improve system continuity and connectivity
Q11 Does project promote multi-modal
solutions?
Promote multi-modal solutions
Q12 Is project on an existing needs list?
Q13 What is the project facility type?
Q16 Are there existing bike/ped facilities
in project area?
(1) Improve system continuity and connectivity,
(2)Promote multi-modal solutions
Q17A How many dwelling units are within
½ mile of project?
Promote the integrated planning of
transportation and land use
Q17B How many businesses are within ½
mile of project?
Promote the integrated planning of
transportation and land use
Q17C How many parks/recreational
facilities are within ½ mile of
project?
Promote the integrated planning of
transportation and land use
Q17D How many schools are within ½
mile of project?
Promote the integrated planning of
transportation and land use
Q19 Are there major construction
challenges?
Q20 Will the project be LAP or will there
be a local financial contribution?
207
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
Q21A Is project within a designated high
crash location/area?
Increase the safety of the transportation system
for users.
Q21B Is project in on arterial or multi-lane
collector?
Increase the safety of the transportation system
for users.
Q21C Is project on a 2-lane collector or
local road?
Increase the safety of the transportation system
for users.
Q21D Does project connect to an existing
facility
(1)Improve system continuity and connectivity,
(2) Promote multi-modal solutions
Q21F Does the project specifically
mitigate a documented crash issue?
Increase the safety of the transportation system
Q21F Has the project location been
identified in previous study or safety
audit?
Increase the safety of the transportation system
Congestion Management Projects
Congestion management projects were evaluated and ranked based on the 14 questions/criteria
listed in the table below which includes the LRTP goal that corresponds to the project.
Congestion Management Projects Questions/Criteria and Associated
Long Range Transportation Plan Goal
Question/Criteria Long Range Transportation Plan
Goal
GQ4 Is the project multijurisdictional?Improve system continuity and
connectivity
GQ6&7 Will there be a technical/monetary
contribution from submitting
jurisdiction?
GQ9 Is ROW acquisition required?
SQ1 Is a TSM (LOS) approach being used?(1) Reduce roadway congestion, (2)
Increase the safety of the transportation
system for users.
SQ2 Is a TDM strategy being used?(1) Reduce roadway congestion, (2)
Increase the safety of the transportation
system for users.
SQ3 Does project support ITS or address a
critical situation?
(1) Reduce roadway congestion, (2)
Increase the safety of the transportation
system for users.
SQ4 Does project increase security?Ensure the security of the transportation
system for users.
SQ5 Does project increase safety or
address a documented safety issue?
Increase the safety of the transportation
system for users.
SQ6
Does project promote regional or
inter-county connectivity?
Improve system continuity and
connectivity.
208
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
SQ7 Does project promote multi-modal
solutions?
Promote multi-modal solutions.
SQ8 Does project protect environmental
resources, or reduce emissions?
Protect environmental resources.
SQ9 Does project promote freight or
economic development?
Promote freight movement.
Bridge Project Application Criteria
Bridge projects were drawn from the East of CR 951Bridge Report. The LRTP and therefore
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) recommendations for bridge projects come directly
from this report. The criteria used to evaluate bridge projects and the associated LRTP are listed
in the table below.
Bridge Project Criteria and
Associated Long Range Transportation Plan Goal
Question/Criteria Long Range Transportation
Plan Goal
1 Emergency response times and proximity to responding
agency.
Increase the safety of the
transportation system for
users.
2 Impact of bridge on increasing mobility and ease of
evacuation.
Improve system continuity
and connectivity.
3 Gains in service efficiency, particularly for schools.Improve system continuity
and connectivity.
4 Public sentiment.
Transit Project Selection
Collier Area Transit (CAT) provides the MPO with transit priorities. These priorities are based
on the Transit Development Plan which is the strategic guide for public transportation in Collier
County. The plan is updated annually, and a major update is completed every five years. The
development of proposed transit projects is based on:
1.Situational Appraisal which is an assessment of CAT’s operating environment to identify
community needs.
2.Transit Demand Assessment which is a technical analysis of transit demand and needs
used to identify areas with characteristics supportive of transit.
209
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
3.Discussion with public agency staffs, visioning surveys, workshops, and stakeholder
discussions.
4. Coordination with the MPO in the long-range transportation planning process
Long Range Transportation Plan Goals associated with the selection of transit projects
include:
1.Reduce roadway congestion.
2.Promote multi-modal solutions.
3.Promote the integrated planning of transportation and land use.
The LRTP and the TIP
LRTPs are the source of other projects contained in the TIP. Proposed projects in an LRTP’s
Cost Feasible Plan are evaluated, in part, on their merits to improve traffic flow, capacity and
congestion as analyzed using the Travel Demand Model (D1RPM). In addition, the LRTP used
several other criteria in project evaluation including:
1.Freight system improvement
2.Wetland and species impacts
3.Evacuation route
4.Cost per lane mile
5.Reduction in congestion
Projects identified in an LRTP needs analysis are selected for inclusion in the Cost Feasible Plan
based on their needs analysis ranking and on a financial analysis of funds that can reasonably be
expected to be available for transportation investments during the timeframe of the plan. Each
year, the MPO will select a subset of the projects in the Cost Feasible Plan for inclusion in the
upcoming TIP.
210
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
APPENDIX J ROLL FORWARD REPORT On July 1 of each year, when the “new” TIP and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Five-Year Work Program (WP) become adopted, there are often projects that were supposed to get authorized prior to June 30 when the “old” TIP and WP were in effect but did not receive authorization. These projects automatically “roll forward” in the WP but not in the TIP. Since the TIP and WP must match each other, there is a need to amend the TIP to include those projects that did not get authorized prior to June 30. Additionally, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) projects do not automatically roll forward in the WP and TIP therefore a roll forward amendment to the TIP must include these projects as well. Each July, FDOT Work Program Office prepares a Roll Forward Report which lists all projects that require a Roll Forward Amendment to the TIP. The Roll Forward Amendment will not be recognized by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) until October 1st which is the effective date of the “new” TIP. The Roll Forward Report on the following three pages is the 2017 Roll Forward Report. The TIP will be amended to include the 2018 Roll Forward Report (replacing the 2017 Report) when it becomes available afterJune 30, 2018. 2118.A.1Packet Pg. 329Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Roll Forward TIP Amendment for Approval by MPO Board on September 8, 2017 for FY 2017/18 through FY 2021/22 # FPN Action Project Name Description & Limits Lead Agency Work Mix Fund Phase FY Amount 1 441512-1 New Project US41 (SR45) US 41 (SR 45) from S of Dunruss Creek to S of Gulf Park Dr FDOT Resurfacing DIH PE 2018 $10,000 2 441561-1 New Project SR90 SR 90 from Whistler’s Cove to Collier Blvd FDOT Resurfacing DIH PE 2018 $10,000 Note: Information in this Amendment is sourced from FDOT Roll Forward Report produced by the FDOT Work Program Office # FPN TIP Page Reference LRTP Page Reference1 441512-1 61B 2040, Appendix A, p3 2 441561-1 61C 2040, Appendix A, p3 COLLIER METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Attest: ___________________ Date: ________ By: _____________________ Date: _________ Anne McLaughlin Commissioner Penny Taylor Collier MPO Executive Director Collier County Board of Commissioners Collier MPO Chair Page 61A 2128.A.1Packet Pg. 330Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4415121 US 41 (SR 45) FROM S OF DUNRUSS CREEK TO S OF GULF PARK DR Non-SIS
Project Description:
Work Summary:
Lead Agency: Length:
Prior Year Cost:
Future Year Cost:
Total Project Cost:
LRTP:
TIP Amendment:
RESURFACING
Managed by FDOT 4.735
0
0
10,000
LRTP Revenue Projections, p 5-5, Appendix A
2017-0908-1A
Phase
Fund
Source 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 Total
PE DIH 10,000 0 0 0 0 10,000
Total 10,000 0 0 0 0 10,000
Roll Forward Amendment September 8, 2017 per FDOT
request to add as new project.
213
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
4415611 SR 90 FROM WHISTLER'S COVE TO COLLIER BLVD Non-SIS
Project Description:
Work Summary:
Lead Agency: Length:
Prior Year Cost:
Future Year Cost:
Total Project Cost:
LRTP:
TIP Amendment:
RESURFACING
Managed by FDOT 1.380
0
0
10,000
LRTP Revenue Projections, p 5-5, Appendix A
2017-0908-1B
Phase
Fund
Source 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 Total
PE DIH 10,000 0 0 0 0 10,000
Total 10,000 0 0 0 0 10,000
Roll Forward Amendment September 8, 2017 per FDOT
request to add as new project.
214
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
APPENDIX K FISCAL CONSTRAINT 2158.A.1Packet Pg. 333Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
Federal, State and Local Funding Estimates
FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 Total
Federal $38,652,631 $12,619,745 $13,636,269 $10,423,770 $20,181,026 $95,513,441
State $39,989,715 $11,535,589 $21,321,001 $15,083,038 $49,901,344 $137,830,687
Local $4,600,531 $4,262,182 $5,430,851 $2,499,900 $2,765,431 $19,558,895
Toll/Turnpike $36,889,334 $5,586,587 $94,545,197 $4,175,000 $4,185,000 $145,381,118
$120,132,211 $34,004,103 $134,933,318 $32,181,708 $77,032,801 $398,284,141
Project Funding Source Estimates
FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 Total
Highways 68,425,629 4,163,572 95,763,632 898,311 59,334,276 $228,585,420
Bridges 0 280,000 2,120,424 1,769,045 0 $4,169,469
Bike/Ped 7,390,141 2,371,839 1,738,636 2,343,107 4,022,528 $17,866,251
Congest Mgm 4,738,210 3,271,448 3,345,417 3,990,013 1,870,254 $17,215,342
Planning 738,441 546,564 546,564 546,564 546,564 $2,924,697
Maintenance 19,536,992 6,097,810 15,151,620 13,995,884 4,185,000 $58,967,306
Transit 8,490,298 7,467,211 7,259,525 7,438,784 7,074,179 $37,729,997
Aviation 10,812,500 9,805,659 9,007,500 1,200,000 0 $30,825,659
$120,132,211 $34,004,103 $134,933,318 $32,181,708 $77,032,801 $398,284,141
Project Cost Estimates
FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 Total
Highways 68,425,629 4,163,572 95,763,632 898,311 59,334,276 $228,585,420
Bridges 0 280,000 2,120,424 1,769,045 0 $4,169,469
Bike/Ped 7,390,141 2,371,839 1,738,636 2,343,107 4,022,528 $17,866,251
Congest Mgm 4,738,210 3,271,448 3,345,417 3,990,013 1,870,254 $17,215,342
Planning 738,441 546,564 546,564 546,564 546,564 $2,924,697
Maintenance 19,536,992 6,097,810 15,151,620 13,995,884 4,185,000 $58,967,306
Transit 8,490,298 7,467,211 7,259,525 7,438,784 7,074,179 $37,729,997
Aviation 10,812,500 9,805,659 9,007,500 1,200,000 0 $30,825,659
$120,132,211 $34,004,103 $134,933,318 $32,181,708 $77,032,801 $398,284,141
FY 2019 ‐ FY 2023 TIP Funding Estimates and Project Cost Estimates
The FY 2019 ‐ FY 2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is
fiscally constrained as shown below.
Please note that the fiscal constraint demonstrated above is from the FDOT
Central Office report run on March 2, 2018
216
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
APPENDIX L GRANT AWARDS §5310 and §5339 2178.A.1Packet Pg. 335Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-
The Collier County Board of Commissioners (BCC) has been the recipient of two grant awards from the
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT).
§5310 Grant Award in a total estimated amount of $345,921 for the purchase of three (3) 23‐
foot standard buses and mobile radios.
o Financial Management Number 435210‐1‐93‐14
o Federal Award Identification Number 1001‐2017‐10
§5339 Grant Award in a total estimated amount of $103,594 for the purchase of two (2) mobile
column lift systems and seven (7) surveillance cameras
o Financial Management Number 439255‐1‐94‐14
o Federal Award Identification Number 1001‐2017‐19
The two awards along with authorizing signatures are included on the following pages. Complete copies
are the awards are available by contacting the MPO office at 239‐252‐8192.
218
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
219
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
220
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
221
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
222
8.A.1
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: FY 19-23 Transportation Improvement Program (5835 : Adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY)2019-2023 Transportation Improvement
06/08/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve 2018 Regional Priorities
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve the 2018 Regional Priorities.
CONSIDERATIONS: Collier and Lee County jointly prioritize regional projects to be eligible for
regional funding. The Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) priorities have been updated to
include Collier County’s request to add Veteran’s Memorial Blvd. Lee MPO added the extension of Three
Oaks Parkway, the widening of Corkscrew Road and construction of Hanson Blvd.
No changes are proposed for the Regional Transportation Alternative Program (RTAP) and the Strategic
Intermodal System priorities (SIS.) Attachment 2.
The priorities will be taken to both the Lee MPO and Collier MPO Boards for approval. FDOT requires a
resolution approving the regional priorities. This resolution is included as Attachment 3.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The TAC and CAC voted to endorse the 2018 Regional
Priorities at their May 21st meetings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board endorse the 2018 Regional Priorities.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Joint Lee Collier TRIP Priorities (PDF)
2. Joint Lee Collier SIS and RTAP Priorities (PDF)
3. Joint MPO Resolution 2018-01 (PDF)
9.A
Packet Pg. 341
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.A
Doc ID: 5844
Item Summary: Approve 2018 Regional Priorities
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
06/01/2018 8:47 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/01/2018 8:47 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/01/2018 8:48 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/01/2018 8:50 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
9.A
Packet Pg. 342
2018 Joint TRIP Priorities for Lee and Collier
Adopted by Collier MPO on June 8, 2018 and Lee MPO on June 22, 2018
Sponsor Route From To Proposed
Improvement
Requested
Phase
Total
Cost
Requested
TRIP Funds
Staff
Priority
Order
State Funding
Level Fiscal Year
(1)
Utilizing or
relieveing
an SIS
Facility
(2)
SIS
Connectiv
ity
(3)
County
Enterprise
Zones, Rural
Area
(4)
Corridor
Managemen
t
Techniques
(5)
Production
Readiness
(6)
TRIP
Funding
Not
Receive
(7)
Job
Access
and
Economic
(8)
Peformance
on Previous
TRIP Projects
(9)
Overmatc
h
(10)
Public Private-
Partnerships Total
Points
Collier County Collier Blvd Golden Gate Main
Canal Golden Gate Pkwy 4L to 6L ROW $2,469,440 $1,234,720 #1 3 3 0 3 5 2 4 2 1 0 23
Cape Coral Chiquita Blvd South of Cape Coral
Pkwy North of SR 78 4L to 6L ROW $30,000,000 $4,000,000 #2 0 0 0 5 3 6 4 0 3 0 21
LeeTran Facility and New
Service Route CST $3,000,000 $1,500,000 #3 3 0 0 5 1 3 4 2 1 0 19
Lee County Burnt Store Rd SR 78 Tropicana Pkwy 2L to 4L CST $7,700,000 $3,850,000 #1 $2,962,302 FY 19/20 3 3 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 21
Lee County Estero Blvd Segment 3 Road Upgrade CST $7,750,000 $3,875,000 #2 0 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 15
LeeTran Facility CST $1,000,000 $500,000 #3 0 0 0 3 5 3 0 2 1 0 14
Fort Myers Hanson Street Veronica Shoemaker Ortiz Ave. New 2L CST $12,000,000 $4,000,000 #1 3 0 2 3 5 6 4 2 1 0 26
Collier County Golden Gate Blvd 20th Street Everglades Blvd 2L to 4L CST $24,300,000 $12,150,000 #2 3 0 0 3 5 2 4 2 1 0 20
Collier County Vanderbilt Beach Rd US 41 E. of Goodlette 4L to 6L CST $8,428,875 $4,214,438 #3 3 0 0 3 5 2 4 2 1 0 20
Collier County Intersection CST 5,953,200$ 2,976,600$ #1 3 1 3 3 5 2 4 2 1 0 24
Collier County Intersection CST $7,304,968 $3,652,484 #2 3 3 0 3 5 2 4 2 1 0 23
Lee County Three Oaks Ext.North of Alico Road New 4L CST $47,000,000 $7,000,000 #3 3 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 3 0 20
Lee County Estero Blvd South Segment Road Upgrade CST $7,750,000 $3,875,000 Funded $ 2,651,966 FY 20/21 0 0 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 15
Collier County Oil Well Road Everglades Oil Well Grade Rd. 2L to 6L CST 31,400,000$ 15,700,000$ #1 3 1 3 3 5 2 4 2 1 0 24
Lee County Corkscrew Road E.of Ben Hill Griffin Bella Terra 2L to 4L CST $12,000,000 $6,000,000 #2 3 3 0 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 21
Lee County Ortiz Colonial Blvd SR 82 2L to 4L CST $13,950,000 $6,975,000 #3 3 1 2 3 5 0 4 2 1 0 21
Collier County Veterans Memorial Blvd.Livingston Road Old US41 New 2 Lane facility CST 10,199,433$ 5,099,716$ #1 3 0 0 5 5 0 4 2 1 0 20
2022/2023
Pine Ridge at Livingston Road Intersection Improvements
Immokalee at Randal Interim Intersection Improvements
2019/2020
2020/2021
2017/2018
Regional Transfer Facility and Connector
2018/2019
LeeTran Capital Expenditures for Passenger Amenities, Bus Pull- Outs, and
pavement markings
2021/2022
9.A.1
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Joint Lee Collier TRIP Priorities (5844 : Approve 2018 Regional Priorities)
9.A.2
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Joint Lee Collier SIS and RTAP Priorities (5844 : Approve 2018 Regional Priorities)
9.A.3
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Joint MPO Resolution 2018-01 (5844 : Approve 2018 Regional Priorities)
9.A.3
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Joint MPO Resolution 2018-01 (5844 : Approve 2018 Regional Priorities)
06/08/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to approve the 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement.
CONSIDERATIONS: The 2017 Joint Certification Report is shown in Attachment 1. The Joint
Certification Report demonstrates that MPO staff has addressed the finding and recommendations
contained in the Federal Transportation Management Area (TMA) review conducted in the Fall of 2016.
No additional findings or recommendations were identified by FDOT , and the MPO is in good standing
regarding compliance with State and federal regulations governing transportation planning. The Board’s
approval of the 2017 joint Certification Report authorizes the MPO Chair to sign the MPO Joint
Certification Statement.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The TAC and CAC were briefed on the 2017 Joint
Certification Report at their May 21st meetings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approve the 2017 Joint Certification Report and
Statement.
Prepared By: Anne McLaughlin, MPO Director
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. 2017 MPO Joint Certification (PDF)
2. 2017 Joint Certification Statement (PDF)
9.B
Packet Pg. 347
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 9.B
Doc ID: 5846
Item Summary: Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
06/01/2018 8:56 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/01/2018 8:56 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/01/2018 8:56 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/01/2018 8:59 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
9.B
Packet Pg. 348
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MPO JOINT CERTIFICATION
525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Collier MPO
Joint Certification – 2017
February 7, 2018
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning
Contents
Purpose ......................................................................................................................... 1
Certification Process ..................................................................................................... 2
Risk Assessment Process ............................................................................................ 3
Section 1: MPO Overview ............................................................................................. 4
Section 2: Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) .................................................... 8
Section 3: Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) ................................................ 9
Section 4: Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) .................................................. 10
Section 5: Finances and Invoicing .............................................................................. 11
Section 6: Title VI and ADA ........................................................................................ 14
Section 7: Disadvantaged Business Enterprises ........................................................ 17
Section 8: District Specific Questions ......................................................................... 18
Section 9: Clean Air Act .............................................................................................. 21
Section 10: Noteworthy Practices & Achievements .................................................... 22
Section 11: Recommendations and Corrective Actions ............................................. 23
Section 12: Attachments ............................................................................................. 25
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 1
Purpose
Each year, the District and the MPO must jointly certify the metropolitan transportation planning
process as described in 23 C.F.R. §450.336. The joint certification begins in January. This allows
time to incorporate recommended changes into the Draft Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).
The District and the MPO create a joint certification package that includes a summary of
noteworthy achievements by the MPO and, if applicable, a list of any recommendations and/or
corrective actions. The District will include the signed joint certification package in its submittal of
the Final UPWP, which is due no later than June 1.
Although the MPO develops and adopts a two-year UPWP, the MPO’s certification must still occur
annually. During those years when no UPW P is being adopted (i.e., year 1), the District and MPO
will still do the certification review in January, albeit as a stand-alone process. The certification
package and statement must be submitted to Central Office, Office of Policy Planning (OPP) no
later than June 1.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 2
Certification Process
Please read and answer each question using the checkboxes to provide a “yes” or “no.” Below
each set of checkboxes is a box where a justification for each answer is to be inserted. The
justification given must be in adequate detail to explain the question. Determining “adequate detail”
is at the discretion of the MPO Liaison conducting the Certification. Please add a justification for
every answer where a box exists.
Since all of Florida’s MPOs adopt a new Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) annually
many of the questions related to the TIP adoption process have been removed from this
certification, as these questions have been addressed during review of the draft TIP and after
adoption of the final TIP.
Please attach any correspondence or comments related to the draft or final TIP, and the
TIP checklist used by Central Office and the District, as an appendix to this certification
report.
As with the TIP, many of the questions related to the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) and
Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) have been removed from this certification document, as
these questions are included in the process of reviewing and adopting the UPWP and LRTP.
If the MPO has adopted a new UPWP or LRTP during the year covered by this certification,
please attach any correspondence or comments related to the draft or final UPWP or LRTP,
and any related checklists used by Central Office and the District, as an appendix to this
certification report.
Note: This Certification has been designed as an entirely electronic document and includes
interactive form fields and checkboxes. Section 12: Attachments allows you to embed any
attachments to the certification, including the MPO Joint Certification Statements and Assurances
document that must accompany the completed Certification report.
Please use the electronic form fields to fill out the Statements and Assurances document,
and then print it. Once all of the appropriate parties sign the Statements and Assurances,
scan it and attach it to the completed Certification in Section 12: Attachments.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 3
Risk Assessment Process
Section 5: Finances and Invoicing is intended to satisfy the Risk Assessment requirements
described in 2 CFR §200.331. These questions will be quantified using a point scale to assign a
level of risk for each MPO, which will be updated annually during the Joint certification process.
The results of the MPO Risk Assessment will determine the minimum frequency of which the
MPO’s supporting documentation for their invoices is reviewed by FDOT District Liaisons for the
upcoming year. The frequency of review, based on the level of risk is below:
Risk Assessment: Certification Year vs. Monitoring
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 4
Section 1: MPO Overview
1. Does the MPO have up-to-date agreements such as the interlocal agreement that creates the
MPO, the intergovernmental coordination and review agreement; and any other applicable
agreements? Please list all agreements and dates that they need to be readopted.
[23 C.F.R. 450.314 (a) and (e)]
Please Check: Yes No
-2/26/15 Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement for creation of the Collier MPO;
requires review every 5 years- next review due 2/2020
-3/2/09 Interlocal Agreement with Lee County MPO for Regional Cooperation; review
required every 5 yrs but automatically renews. thus, would have been reviewed in 2014.
Next review due 3/2019. However, Collier and Lee County MPO have iinitiated an
update, reviewed at joint meeting in October 2017. Next steps are Collier MPO Board
action 2/9/18 to be followed by Lee County MPO on a date TBD.
-7/1/16 MPO Agreement with FDOT for PL funding. Current agreement expires on
6/30/2018.
6/28/16 amended Staff Services Agreement & amended Lease Agreement with Collier
County; 3 yr review required in 6/2019
-6/2/14 FDOT D1 Regional Planning Model Agreement; remains in effect until FDOT
determines new one required for 2045 LRTP
2. Does the MPO coordinate the planning of projects that cross MPO boundaries with the other
MPO(s)?
[23 C.F.R. 450.314(e)]
Please Check: Yes No
-pursuant to Interlocal Agreement with Lee County MPO identified in response to
question 1; coordinate on development of regional roadway network, regional
nonmotorized network, regional transit service connections and regional project priorities
-may enter into regional agreements for project specific undertakings. none currently
underway, but Lee County MPO is considering Origin and Destination Survey and if they
proceed with it, Collier MPO is likely to participate through a joint agreement.
3. Does the MPO planning process provide for consideration of the 10 Planning Factors?
[23 U.S.C. 134(h); 23 C.F.R. 450.306(a)]
Please Check: Yes No
-The 2040 LRTP p 3-7 identifies the 8 planning factors in effect per MAP-21 requirements
-2 new requirements resulting from the FAST-ACT; included in new member orientation
PPT slide 12 and all 10 criteria considered in project prioritization process
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 5
- The UPWP identifies the 10 planning factors and illustrates which task addresses each
factor.
-Draft Scope for 2045 LRTP includes all 10 factors
4. Are the transportation plans and programs of the MPO based on a continuing, comprehensive,
and cooperative process?
[23 C.F.R. 450.300 (a)]
Please Check: Yes No
-referenced in 2040 LRTP p1-1.
-referenced in current MPO Board and Advisory Committees Orientation PPT slide 4
-recent example is adoption of Government to Government Public Involvement Policy
involving tribal entities
5. Does the MPO have an up-to-date congestion management process?
[339.175 (6)(c)(1) F.S.]
Please Check: Yes No N/A
2017 CMP Update adopted by MPO Board 10/30/2017
6. Does the MPO have a documented Public Participation Plan that defines a process in sufficient
detail for members of the public to have reasonable opportunity to participate in the planning
process?
[23 C.F.R. 450.316 (a)]
Please Check: Yes No
MPO's 2014 PIP revisions approved by MPO Board on 2/10/2017
7. Has the MPO recently reviewed its Public Participation Plan? If so, when?
[23 C.F.R. 450.316 (a)(1)(x)]
Please Check: Yes No
-Reviewed and revised on 2/10/2017; additional revisions currently underway to expand
and improve public engagement while eliminating ineffective requirements; incorporate
Government to Government Public Involvement Policy (tribal entitites); anticipate
advisory committee review in February or March 2018
8. Was the Public Participation Plan made available for public review for at least 45 days before
adoption?
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 6
[23 C.F.R. 450.316(a)(3)]
Please Check: Yes No
-2/10/2017 adoption of revised PIP followed 45-day public comment period
9. Does the MPO utilize one of the methods of procurement identified in 2 C.F.R. 200.320 (a-f)?
[2 C.F.R. 200.320]
Please Check: Yes No
-The Collier County Grants Management Office is highly trained on CFR 200 including
section 200.320 methods of procurement, which are rigorously followed by MPO staff
and County Procurement Office.
-Recent document review conducted by FDOT and results of recent and current annual
financial audits attest to compliance with CFR 200.
10. Does the MPO maintain sufficient records to detail the history of procurement? These records
will include, but are not limited to: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract
type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.
Note: this documentation is required by 2 C.F.R. 200.324 (a) to be available upon request by the Federal awarding
agency, or pass-through entity when deemed necessary.
[2 C.F.R. 200.318 (i)]
Please Check: Yes No
-Documentation required and maintained by Collier County Grants Management Office
during procurement process includes: rational for method of procurement, selection of
contract type, contractor selection or rejection and basis for the contract price. Forms
maintained on each procurement project include Method Of Procurement (MOP) and
Initial Cost Estimate (ICE) prepared by MPO staff.
11. Does the MPO have any intergovernmental or inter-agency agreements in place for
procurement or use of goods or services?
[2 C.F.R. 200.318 (e)]
Please Check: Yes No
N/A
12. Does the MPO have methods in place to maintain oversight to ensure that consultants or
contractors are performing work in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications of
their contracts or work orders?
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 7
[2 C.F.R. 200.318 (b)]
Please Check: Yes No
Each project manager is responsible for ensuring that consultants are performing work in
accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications of their contract. In addition,
invoices are routinely reviewed against contracts to ensure consistency.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 8
Section 2: Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)
1. When developing the LRTP, did the MPO provide the required individuals and entities a
reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed plan and program?
[23 C.F.R. 450.316 (a)]
Please Check: Yes No
2040 LRTP public involvement documentation may be viewed on Collier MPO website
(www.colliermpo.com) at this link:
http://colliermpo.com/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=9440 and hard copies
are available on request.
2. Is the LRTP published or otherwise readily available for public review?
[23 C.F.R. 450.324 (k), 23 C.F.R 450.326 (b)]
Please Check: Yes No
The 2040 LRTP may be viewed at this link:
http://colliermpo.com/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=9877 Hard copies
available on request.
3. Did the MPO adopt a new LRTP in the year that this certification is addressing?
Please Check: Yes No
If yes, please attach any correspondence or comments related to the draft or final LRTP,
and the LRTP checklist used by Central Office and the District, as an appendix to this
certification report
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 9
Section 3: Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
1. Did the MPO update their TIP in the year that this certification is addressing?
Please Check: Yes No
If yes, please attach any correspondence or comments related to the draft or final TIP,
and the TIP checklist used by Central Office and the District, as an appendix to this
certification report
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 10
Section 4: Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
1. Did the MPO adopt a new UPWP in the year that this certification is addressing?
Please Check: Yes No
If yes, please attach any correspondence or comments related to the draft or final UPWP,
and the UPWP checklist used by Central Office and the District, as an appendix to this
certification report
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 11
Section 5: Finances and Invoicing
1. Are Federal-aid funds expended in conformity with applicable Federal and State laws, the
regulations in 23 C.F.R. and 49 C.F.R., and policies and procedures prescribed by the Division
Administrator of FHWA?
Please Check: Yes No (+1)
The Collier MPO has conformed with State and Federal laws, policies and procedures as
prescribed by t he Division Administrator of FHWA.
2. How often does the MPO currently submit invoices to the District for review and
reimbursement?
The Collier MPO submits their invoices on a quarterly basis (for the three month period)
3. Timeliness of Invoicing
Has the MPO submitted invoices to the District for reimbursement more than 90 days after
the end of the invoicing period?
Please Check: Yes (+1 for each late invoice) No
The Collier MPO has not submitted their invoices past 90 days, in fact, they send their
invoices within 30 days after the invoicing period
4. Since the last Joint Certification, have any incurred costs by the MPO been deemed
unallowable, not necessary or not reasonable by the District based on invoice or supporting
documentation review?
Please Check: Yes No
All incurred costs have been allowable in both the District invoice and Document Review.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 12
5. If the answer to question 4 was yes, how many incurred costs since the last Joint Certification
have been deemed unallowable, not necessary or not reasonable?
+1 for each incurred cost deemed unallowable, not necessary or not reasonable
N/A
6. Has the MPO/TPO shown mismanagement of the UPWP budget, the PL fund balance, or
incurred expenses, resulting in emergency payments outside of the contract, or other situations
of financial concern?
Please Check: Yes (+1) No
The Collier MPO is very ethical in the financial management of their funds and they have
very knowledgeable, experienced and consciencious staff managing the finances
pertaining to the MPO's UPWP, PL funds and other incurred expenses.
7. Does the MPO’s financial management system comply with the requirements set forth in
2 C.F.R. §200.302?
Please Check: Yes No (+1)
The Collier MPO's financial management system follows the rules and regulations set
forth in 2 C.F.R.
8. Are records of costs incurred under the terms of the MPO Agreement maintained and readily
available upon request by FDOT at all times during the period of the MPO Agreement, and
for five years after final payment is made?
Please Check: Yes No (+1)
Yes, the MPO's record of costs have been readily available upon request and maintained
for 7 years after the final payment is made.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 13
9. Is supporting documentation submitted by the MPO to FDOT in detail sufficient for proper
pre-audit and post-audit monitoring?
Please Check: Yes No (+1)
Yes.Per our risk asessment documentation revews.
10. Does the MPO comply with, and require its consultants and contractors to comply with,
applicable Federal law pertaining to the use of Federal-aid funds?
Please Check: Yes No (+1)
Yes. The MPO complies with applicable federal laws and ensures that it's contractors do
as well.
Risk Assessment Point Total: 0
Level of Risk: Low
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 14
Section 6: Title VI and ADA
1. Does the MPO have a signed Title VI policy statement expressing commitment to non-
discrimination?
[23 C.F.R. 200.9 (a)(1)]
Please Check: Yes No
-The MPO Title VI Policy statement is included in the UPWP. It is executed on an annual
basis and sent to FDOT. The policy statement is also included on each MPO Board
agenda
2. Does the MPO take action to correct any deficiencies found by FDOT within a reasonable time
period, not to exceed 90 days, in order to implement Title VI compliance?
[23 C.F.R. 200.9 (a)(3)]
Please Check: Yes No
No deficiencies have been found by FDOT; however, the MPO would take action within a
reasonable time period, not to exceed 90 days, if needed to implement Title VI
compliance.
3. Does the MPO have a staff person assigned to handle Title VI and ADA-related issues?
[23 C.F.R. 200.9 (b)(1); 49 C.F.R. 27.13]
Please Check: Yes No
MPO Director is the staff person assigned.
4. Does the MPO have a procedure in place for the prompt processing and disposition of Title VI
and Title VIII complaints, and does this procedure comply with FDOT’s procedure?
[23 C.F.R. 200.9 (b)(3)]
Please Check: Yes No
MPO has a Discrimination Complaint Procedure in place; Board approved 5/11/2007
MPO staff has developed an updated, combined Policy and Procedure and Complaint
Form for incorporation in PIP update in 2018
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 15
5. Does the MPO collect statistical data (race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability) of
participants and beneficiaries of the MPO’s programs and activities?
[23 C.F.R. 200.9 (b)(4)]
Please Check: Yes No
-MPO updated demographic data and mapped Environmental Justice Communities in
response to recommendation by FHWA Federal Certification review December
2016.MPO followed federal guidelines, using a variety of resources and sources,
including the US Census and the American Community Survye, the US EPA's EJ
Screening tool and local knowledge.
-As part of Scope for Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan, anticipated completion date June
30, 2018, consultant is further updating and refining EJ community mapping and
identification.
6. Does the MPO conduct an annual review of their program areas (for example: public
involvement) to determine their level of effectiveness in satisfying the requirements of Title VI?
[23 C.F.R. 200.9 (b)(6)]
Please Check: Yes No
MPO Director included report on Title VI program in Annual Report given to MPO Board
on 12/8/2017.
7. Has the MPO participated in any recent Title VI training, either offered by the State, organized
by the MPO, or some other form of training, in the past year?
Please Check: Yes No
MPO Director attended FDOT Civil Rights Roundtable 12/14/16 in Sarasota Fl.
MPO Senior Planner attended FDOT regional training session held in November 2017
held in Arcadia.
MPO staff viewed FDOT Foundations of Environmental Justice webinar series over the
summer and held debriefings during staff meetings
8. Does the MPO have a signed Nondiscrimination Agreement, including Title VI Assurances,
with the State?
Please Check: Yes No
-The MPO executes a Title VI/Nondiscrimination Policy Statement each year as part of
the UPWP. The statement is transmitted to FDOT on an annual basis.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 16
9. Do the MPO’s contracts and bids include the appropriate language, as shown in the
appendices of the Nondiscrimination Agreement with the State?
Please Check: Yes No
Each of the MPO's contracts include all required language as an exhibit. The language
shown in the nondiscrimination agreement is included in Exhibit A.
10. Does the MPO hold its meetings in locations that are ADA accessible?
[49 C.F.R. 27.7 (5)]
Please Check: Yes No
Each of the MPO's Board and advisory committees are in buildings that have been
determined to be ADA accessible. Each agenda includes a statement that in accordance
with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any one requing special accomodations should
notify the MPO Executive Director and accomodations will be made.
11. Does the MPO take appropriate steps to ensure its communications are available to persons
with impaired vision and hearing?
[49 C.F.R. 27.7 (6)(c)]
Please Check: Yes No
Each agenda includes a statement that in accordance with the Americans with
Disabilities Act, any one requing special accomodations should notify the MPO Executive
Director and accomodations will be made.
The MPO has made accomodations in the past, including using microphones at
meetings, to accommodate hearing impaired committee members. The MPO currently
has a committee member that is vision impaired. Staff has contacted him to determine
the best way to meet his needs. As requested, all items are sent to him electronically
prior to the meeting.
12. Does the MPO keep on file for one year all complaints of ADA noncompliance received, and
for five years a record of all complaints in summary form?
[49 C.F.R. 27.121]
Please Check: Yes No
MPO received verbal complaint from Miccosukee Tribal planning representative in 2017.
No formal, written complain followed. MPO established a template for recording and
tracking actions on complaints and will maintain the detailed log of communications for 5
years. .
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 17
Section 7: Disadvantaged Business Enterprises
1. Does the MPO have a FDOT-approved Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) plan?
Please Check: Yes No
The MPO adopted a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Policy on May 12, 2006. This
policy is in accordance with FDOT's DBE Plan.
2. Does the MPO track DBE participation through the use of the Bid Opportunity List and DBE
Participation Statement?
Please Check: Yes No
This information is tracked by the Collier County Purchasing Department as all MPO
requests for proposals and contracts are placed through their system. All contracts and
scopes of services require the vender to fill‐out an anticipated DBE statement form and
an additional form each time the anticipated DBE percentage changes or is updated. The
anticipated DBE forms and invoice amounts are tracked and monitored by the MPO staff
and the Budget Analyst assigned to the MPO.
3. Does the MPO report actual payments to DBEs through the Equal Opportunity Compliance
(EOC) system?
Please Check: Yes No
The MPO is requesting a username and password for the new EOC system. Any new
vendors and payments will be reported through the EOC system until we obtain access
to the EOC system.
4. Does the MPO include the DBE policy statement in its contract language for consultants and
subconsultants?
Please Check: Yes No
The MPO includes a DBE Participation/Policy statement in its contract language for all
consultants and subconsultants.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 18
Section 8: District Specific Questions
The District may ask up to five questions at their own discretion based on experience interacting
with the MPO that were not included in the sections above. Please fill in the question, and the
response in the blanks below. This section is optional, and may cover any topic area of which the
District would like more information.
1. Please explain how the Collier MPO addressed the Corrective Action for the Congestion
Management Process (CMP) as noted in the September, 2016 FHWA and FTA Joint
Certification.
The MPO was quite thorough in addressing the Corrective Action, viewing it as an
opportunity to improve the Congestion Management Process, which had last been
updated in 2008. The issue concerned the lack of formal evaluation assessments
conducted on completed projects and reliance on a limited number of strategies to
address congestion. The MPO took the following steps:
-Reviewed CMS/ITS prioritized projects against projects in the TIP completed during the
years applicable to the Certification Review (2012-2016); compiled a list of projects and
sponsoring agencies
-Reviewed the 2008 CMP for applicable evaluation criteria and realized none were
formerly adopted or assigned to specific projects. This has been corrected in the 2012
CMP. To address the Corrective Action, the MPO reviewed the benefits described in the
project applications; developed a matrix of benefits ascribed to projects anad distributed
it to sponsoring agencies to evaluate whether the benefits had been achieved and
describe the data and analysis supporting their conclusions. This led to a better
understanding of how to relate evaluation criteria to performance metrics for the CMP
update.
-Demonstrated how lessons-learned from the evaluation of former projects informed the
2017 CMP Update. The Update included an Implementation Matrix that draws attention
to the need to study and apply a total of 31 strategies derived from a review of Best
Practices.
-Established new priorities to conduct studies addressing Travel Demand Management,
Transportation and Land Use Policy and conducting a Regional Park & Ride Study. In
addition, the CMP Update calls for the development of a data-driven Transportation
System Perforrmance Report to institutionalize the practice of continual evaluation and
monitoring of performance.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 19
2. Please explain how the Collier MPO addressed the suggested Recommendation to seek
available opportunities to attend freight meetings in their efforts to build a stronger relationship
with the Freight industry as noted in the September, 2016 FHWA and FTA Joint Certification.
The MPO contacted the FDOT-Freight Coordinator and received several hours of training
on the FDOT Freight Plan. County Transportation Planning staff were invited to the
training session, and one staff member attended. We discussed how best to develop an
understanding of freight industry needs and which forums would be most effective for the
freight industry representatives to communicate with the MPO. The FDOT Freight
Coordinator subsequently invited MPO staff to attend a regional coordination meeting in
the Immokalee area where agricultural and mining industries are clustered. We were able
to meet industry representatives, and hear what their needs and concerns are. We are
on the FDOT's mailing list to be informed of future meetings, and we have contact
information to reach out to freight industry representatives as needed.
3. Please explain the efforts (Policy) that the Collier MPO recently undertook to promote Tribal
involvement in the MPO Planning Process in 2017.
The MPO Chair initiated a meeting with the Miccosukee Tribal Council to discuss items of
mutual interest and to hear tribal concerns regarding ongoing projects that would impact
their privately held and reservation lands on or near US41 east. Both entities were open
to developing a high-level communication protocol commonly referred to as "Government
to Government." In this protocol, the Chair of an MPO or Board of County
Commissioners agrees to communicate with the Chair or Director of the Tribal
Government to discuss upcoming projects, identify any concerns or areas of mutual
interest, prior to decisions having to be made. This allows for better communication and
mutual understanding to develop over time. Staff members of the respective
governments may interact more informally and as often as needed. The MPO ultimately
obtained the support of three tribal entities - the Seminole Tribe of Florida, the
Miccosukee Tribe of Florida, and the Council of the original Miccosukee Simanolee -
Nation Aboriginal Peoples. (The Seminole and Miccosukee Tribes are federally
recognized.) The MPO Board adopted its Government to Government Public
Involvement Policy in June 2017. We believe it is the first MPO to have done so in the
State of Florida.
4. Please provide examples of any steps the MPO has taken in preparation for the upcoming new
2 year UPWP.
MPO staff began the process of preparing a new 2-year UPWP by holding a kick-off
meeting with Collier County Public Transportation and Neighborhood Enhancement
Division (PTNE) to discuss their transit planning needs. Next, the MPO raised it as a
discussion item at the MPO Citizens and Technical Advisory Committee meetings and
followed-up with a discussion item before the MPO Policy Board at one of their meetings.
The MPO has coordinated with our FDOT D1 Planning Liaison throughout the process
and is preparing a draft UPWP that includes FDOT's focus areas.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 20
5. Please explain the action(s) taken towards the process of updating the MPO's Bike/Ped
Masterplan.
The MPO began with a staff update of the existing conditions reported in the 2012 Plan.
Staff focused on bicycle and pedestrian safety (crash) data and demographics, the latter
in order to identify areas with potential Environmental Justice concerns. Staff's work
culminated in a series of GIS overlays and identification of Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety
Focus Areas for further analysis and discussion.
The MPO then hired Tindale Oliver Associates to assist with the development of the new
Plan. Staff developed a Stakeholders Group to broaden the outreach beyond the
Technical, Citizens and Bike/Ped Advisory Committees, then invited all four groups to a
Kick-Off meeting in October 2017 to facilitate communications between interested
parties.The Kick-Off meeting was well attended.
The MPO has incorporated a number of innovative public outreach techniques thus far,
including an interactive map (Wikimaps) and survey (Survey Monkey) posted on the
MPO website. The survey is available in English, Spanish and Creole. The MPO
received over 300 comments in a very short timeframe using these techniques. The MPO
hosted a well-attended public meeting in north-central Collier County that was the subject
of a staff interview on Spanish language television see: https://youtu.be/d1ekNc_JVfg
Staff is continuing to expand the public outreach to include hosting a booth at a number
of local farmers markets and making presentations on thte plan at Community
Redevelopment Agency meetings in Immokalee and Bayshore.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 21
Section 9: Clean Air Act
The requirements of Sections 174 and 176 (c) and (d) of the Clean Air Act.
The Clean Air Act requirements affecting transportation only applies to areas designated
nonattainment and maintenance for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Florida
currently is attaining all NAAQS. No certification questions are required at this time. In the event
the Environmental Protection Agency issues revised NAAQS, this section may require revision.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 22
Section 10: Noteworthy Practices & Achievements
One purpose of the certification process is to identify improvements in the metropolitan
transportation planning process through recognition and sharing of noteworthy practices. Please
provide a list of the MPOs noteworthy practices and achievements below.
Government to Government Public Involvement Policy - improved communications and
cooperation with tribal entities
Strategic Plan - improved business practices and skills
Annual Report on performance measures - combines required performance measures
with those adopted by the MPO Board; established base year performance as point of
comparison with future activities
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 23
Section 11 : Recommendations and Corrective Actions
Status of Recommendations and/or Corrective Actions from Prior Certifications
2016 Federal TMA Review
-Conduct review of Joint Regional Transportation Planning and Coordination agreement
between Collier and Lee County MPO. - staff submitted revisions to Joint MPO Policy
Board in October and is following up with each entity separately to adopt final revisions in
201
-Update freight planning documents on website and seek opportunities to attend greight
industry meetings and events - updated documents are now on the website and staff has
attended a training session with FDOT Freight Coordinator and participated in an FDOT
hosted coordination meeting with freight industry representatives held in Immokalee in
2017.
-Conduct annual training on COOP - staff held a training session in August 2017 and put
the training into action when Hurricane Irma struck in September 2017
Recommendations
Safety - work with other MPOs and MPOAC to learn how to utilize available crash data
and hot spot analyses - staff has discussed and presented data to other MPOs at
regional CUTs meeting and at joint Lee County/Collier MPO advisory committee and
Board meetings; staff received training on Crash Data Management System (CDMS) tool
used by Collier County and available to the MPO and is becoming familiar with FDOT
crash data and mapping tools.
-PIP - update PIP to reflect current practices; expand tribal outreach; report on
participation in community events; expand understanding of "significant" public
comments and response to them (vis-à-vis the TIP); consider using social media; update
website on regular basis - staff has acted on all of these recommendations as
documented by current work updating the PIP, adoption of the Government-to-
Government policy; maintaining and reporting on public involvement on all topics and
plans; and is in process of posting MPO activities on County sponsored Facebook page.
Title VI and EJ - be more proactive, update EJ data and maps and incorporate into plans;
attend training on civil rights and add links to complaint procedure to website; conduct
evaluation of effectiveness of activities - staff has act ed on all of these
recommendations, has updated and continues to update EJ data and community maps
and is incorporating information in current plans; staff has attended trainings and added
link on website.
Corrective Actions
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 24
Congestion Management Process - submitted follow-up correspondence and
documentation in the 2008 CMP Update providing an evaluation of the effectiveness of
identified strategies. The analysis was required to clearly reflect the results of the
evaluation and how it would be used to guide the selection and use of strategies for
future implementation. Received FHWA approval and closure on Corrective Action.
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
FDOT Joint Certification 525-010-05
POLICY PLANNING
11/17
Office of Policy Planning 25
Section 12: Attachments
Please attach any documents required from the sections above, or other certification related
documents here. (Link to MPO Joint Certification Statements and Assurances)
9.B.1
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: 2017 MPO Joint Certification (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
9.B.2
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: 2017 Joint Certification Statement (5846 : Approve 2017 Joint Certification Report and Statement)
06/08/2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan Update
OBJECTIVE: For the Board to receive a brief update on the Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan
CONSIDERATIONS: Staff provided an update at the Board’s May 11 meeting on the work to date for
the Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan. Since then a second stakeholder meeting has been held.
The application of population density as a criterion in the prioritization of baskets of priority projects has
been explored. A population density criterion was added to the Environmental Justice (EJ) and crash
criteria and tested on facility gaps on the arterial/collector network. Adding this criterion reduced the
number of arterial/collector facility gaps by excluding gaps that met the EJ and crash criteria which is th e
exact opposite of plan’s goals of improving safety in an equitable manner. There is also a strong
correlation between higher population density, and EJ and higher crash areas which include population by
proxy. At this point, population density is not being added as an additional criterion.
A method to appropriately assess bicycle and pedestrian needs on local roads is still being developed.
Currently, using proximity to transit stops is being explored. At this point, only the Tier One projects
from the recently completed Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study and remaining Tier One
projects from prior walkable community studies are included as bicycle and pedestrian needs on local
roads.
The stakeholder group also discussed the need to increase the connectivity of the bicycle and pedestrian
network; and if and how seasonal population should be included in the analysis. While a seasonal increase
in population may create additional need, current funding is insufficient to meet the needs of existing
year-round residents. The consultant continues to explore this issue.
The consultant will use the more than 600 public comments, input from multiple committee and
stakeholder meetings, and data analysis to begin drafting the actual plan. The consultant, in conju nction
with County and MPO staff will continue work on developing policy language that will help the plan
achieve its mission of providing a safe, comprehensive and interconnected of bicycle and pedestrian
facilities that encourages and inspires residents and visitors to bike and walk throughout Collier County.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: n/a
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board receive a brief update on the Bicycle & Pedestrian
Master Plan.
Prepared By: Eric Ortman, MPO Senior Planner
10.A
Packet Pg. 377
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 10.A
Doc ID: 5848
Item Summary: Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan Update
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
06/01/2018 9:11 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
06/01/2018 9:11 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 06/01/2018 9:11 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 06/01/2018 9:12 AM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
10.A
Packet Pg. 378
06/08/2018
COLLIER COUNTY
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Item Number: 13.A
Item Summary: Regular Meeting - September 14, 2018 - 9:00 a.m. Board of County
Commissioners Chambers, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112
Meeting Date: 06/08/2018
Prepared by:
Title: Planner, Senior – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Brandy Otero
05/31/2018 3:46 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Executive Director - MPO – Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name: Anne McLaughlin
05/31/2018 3:46 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Metropolitan Planning Organization Brandy Otero MPO Analyst Review Completed 05/31/2018 3:47 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin MPO Executive Director Review Completed 05/31/2018 3:53 PM
Metropolitan Planning Organization Anne McLaughlin Meeting Pending 06/08/2018 9:00 AM
13.A
Packet Pg. 379