CR 06/12/2018 cr. cci
z o-, m CD
r m tn
0 =
-< o - 8
cm O -< o CCI
D 0Z -0 07
n m 0 -< r° CD
-- m r < 7J 0 to 1 a
D � m Fri
\
nco
rn � za -'1 cmn z O
C7 zv) Fa ) 1
C �ID o �O ro a
m-.4 umz = o , IA \,
a, r
v oo m cUW
-n r0 m Z CD
700 00 CA) co 0 _ 7,
20 CLmo 0. '2 =
-1 --I co 0- a: Q.
ivt
rn 7 U) m 0 n o
--1 0 0 -n D o o `."• 3 -
m7J D 23> 0z 3 cD
r wm 70 ornz f CDCD
ril -T1Er-1 -G g m
O N
0 • m = � �1
2 0o ocnmo '2.-"0
rn �rn 0 0 2> En
-n --nnomg moo
—I 73 w cZoog l
-1 O c') Cr) CI) 0� P
Z =' 0 D ozm
rn 0 Z -D --I O '
v � m v70n7
Cl) r- -I 73gg � O
-1-2 c;') R —8 --' cg '->i -1-
TT, D (1--
D o D o � �
cci
73 m O m m -t
< z U) L.) C-754 i
� D C � �
r mm 0 � D
Z F-
M
rn ° z r �r
D -G
-G m = m70
m
(7 C) m z
0 D >
70 -10
oz
--A0
mz
co
-d co tQ
co d Q.
cNo m
CV
G U) -o t O
0co
y 0 V3 � o \
i0r m coo 0
1 0 '7= \
7 X00 73 ° 1
m2
5, `nO G f:':3-' ,
01 -73 7
to 2 m m 37 z �� (CI
- � a w � 1-- o ‘
CO
O o m --' 0 S
73 G,m ? se7 °
w
0-
O o 0
Z. vftr) fi
, c to 00 ` N•
oD
9,5, CP
� m \J 1 s
3, i n 7 a cr,a' c. J1
a
O �o 73 ��o 10
C)
. oOoo - v 141110-+ cn
mr on -.° m m
t
? o
r1 O r cr0 0 o
-n n
S
to 63 -a m v a
rnco S- -/M3/1
m
O m(6 Q
55
rrl o _ omv0 m
'
3 too73m �Z +7 O a
r �
m `= mc
r -02 <
d
crl a2n .
.
-Ao
o ,
7—
mmm
l
---
nci) ''
7
Va
73
Z �
S
co. 59
eV-
-n O c.0 tD
c P (r) 0 -o ��\ Z S
I3-7.-
so ill �' wm
-o m 5 o m, r,1 0
•
CZ) G .g c.
mZ ,i ZG,
5 _SNP O u��a I'
r mZ, J 0Z 13\
ill '2 3 111 _ z
m �' `'
z m m �,z m cU
4 � a m � 2
0 po -173-' �r0� M T s
O T Z —, Z w 0 s VA
Z Zo Gi mG - C°
= OrTA maN
5. y o Iv
7 = cn 0U'-' Cr a
03 cc' rn
O �
0 -33
`0v Zg c Ut 2 0
oo 0 � � -'mccZ5vW Z
r ' ��m
r
N _ i
hc77T' � cr
f`
oaZ m5, Zooe Z.
O Z y G,00
-173SIN a z
� m r, cnG (� co
�,
"p ai
6) ) CD
C
.G r�ir
0 CO tD
G
co
c' V � � = Z
r o to co
T' co
o
n c�Z m ,mZ
m z� 4 (I-)
2 � �
\---n
C� r) mG� o
0 - 0 �� 8
mZm ?` Z0
-
rti 00
w ta
pro CD
--go m o 1
73 �,m Z�w 0. -o
oGNZ Z 1 11n v s
G")G VI 0
U' N n -co
�-5- N m �E. 3
rrA S
To m N 73 o a
o� �O 5.o A ov - a ' n
�
ill l\.
r ? --1 --A Crt � S
� o=
73 va
Z co (CI
I='
Q-
CD Ca
mO
G. G Z Z '� •ocl , CD
•
io ill Go � �. 2
mw `'
J m —z cn ,.-
0 ui v...) o z \—\
mcn
p G9
5 cn 0 c o
I-- m?i w
m it
Z m �o •P
7'
4 va m
Zw =Fita
T 0 - 0 0 r o
�m -om s
Z Zoe ., -+� D n
= o � [n = oo o 3
00
m .70T � oo � S
1--
73 Ili -11 T mCP
-SI"
1-4 a
0
o -f%
�
O 5.O 70m = o • ,
cn . - 0c1) m01 C)
m o0 0 71' (
a /,
mZ c‘..1 cmoo
m�O ooo r,ti
4 zcn 20 U, .%
�� mom -' ��° '.1
-o U,� 0 z�
7 ocin 4 ccr) (-`
P_, •
Z m0 N m= `
�l -4 v 0 t
_ 0 r
r
m o Z -4
= T
I
QZ:
7� m 0m
0 iii c
=
--c___ , .23 0 7.- re)i___
m Z
CCD SU cC D
-a 3 ( 2
D
C CD CD
CD CD =
O
o ca
E
C
n CD
- m o m D o rf
r K r- o- r _ CD
� K 3
CD) corn m � � x =
m cn -I m � oc� Z
O z us cn m c
rc-,n, z v omz O
� O 0 m ° �
m m m O Li? 2 733
m o
Z = c `/)
v zmm m G) zz
-n rr 0 m C 1 > m
- L 1
O -0O m •zm � )
Oco - 7z) --< ,...„--
I- \ -
0 0 CM
z o c -1 2 61
2 oc -"l mom `'' ` Q o
o � m 0DD -.
m 20 Cn row ( CD cQ
D _O p T1 7=1< L lib- N a CO
W I O 1 m "5' _�
r 9dm M 0-71
� 0 , - o ID
-10 -o O m z D -
� o coca • N
o o -.1m oo7JoZ
(11 O
r. op O o ° Z o
m m z D 03 73
r ' z 5fl -'n c.. m - n
C-a -IJ c73 m
--i _1
073Car_ Z No --
m -i Wo
—1 0 � D> r pG)
m zo - Z D m z `J
m v z D 0 ((.-
F z > C 0 o O g-
I ` )
Cn r -I X1 m o9 5
cn --
r' z x
m O m
> o73 y map
m o * v oc r 5)v
zi Dm m cnm. co = l;
-1 m _,
0 co m0 � -• ,
n m O D73r
r 'mm z � pr
m oz r moo
o f>z �' o0
r c < "1 0
-' 00<
-< mc
- m z � r
2 0
c r>
=D (�
73r
V
5 1P
73 szo 0"
co s
C •
`° a
Q-
C
m Ca
G G-0 0i CD
00 co -13 \,
7_7-
On m
a m-
2m5. r0
O
C) co Wmz
G) \N
5( r) -- O 6 70
rm�,• ✓ Z• z
rn u)z 73 mzz
1,7
o �omN+ Z • (CI
-o
"e-3- .P zw o- 50
� myv c NraNN s
co= O5. y o
-4 94 o� O *+ m o
'PP _ w 1:33 51 01O W m
5 1719P
O• .i o /r O Q '7. - . -a
..1 cP Z v*.*. i C'0
= OO C7 O �pG� Z
111 :
r mZ a� O
m rn
z'Am mO
o
?1O Or- Oro
_, On p o -4
o
Z
v �omZ5. z
0
Q Z y - 0
1
NInco omm
� cww igA
r TA Tel v;o1 v nZ �
CP VA o = CI oil+
rO m cnmz
73 �z N m 0�+
Z mO N -ova
m 0 Z r Z.Op
T� oo -' o"-„ ��
m to,
co
s
-a co• O
N m
lets
O cn
03
S. 2
yo n6om
ill
\\''
2Cp 4 oz .4
0 SI % V)��m (0,to z CD
O 00
no = G-)- cD
2 zo c � U' C)
y N , , N• oo5- m ��
o O oNm
....% 73
0 • ooa \ � n
oo n �
R+ u o O v�c?, N.
`N
r --; •-•\ m
� � mZ T33 o► c o
a �0 25.aa
O�m � coo
cp
y? A Gia " �.
ill m� 1' � �m
4 0
y' Ocn Q vo -AN
ilt o o m 0 yr'o co v
co G)
O �a �
s 2 00 •
moZ 2nd 1
-; o -
73
m
O -6 tD
0 0.
m0 VA
o
`
-oO
w
- Z a
CP 7 -I �
cyO
so , o A
r a N,
O
to %' U, p ,-2
C) Z G
O � 0 0 D o •
1O -0 2 A o ce' A
OO c eP a3
Z m
mZN O Oo
co
�ZOOo � O7
, a-
'. - v y Amo .�
Z Z 31 ,A ��00 9-..,
N 33 se.
y � 0
S O5 OA
?�
'1 -0 O Q Z
9\33cn 73a�n t _ .04o
� 3 0
p 'a ort-to :62c)
0
I.
O S: :S::
CO cn o
A
co
of 2v -c �
l -k 13rn
�
y v O 2� �
�n of CII
N.
m
r -02 14. ym,
m Z A‘ .\ '7
m
73 0 CD
m
co 0 Clo
m m
1
Ca
Gm 0 f ) -O . .P � o
CA, Z5
0 73 yom L,03m 0
-o m5. �
oma m
•
n ca Amo .t N
z
VI
CP O Z��
mZ
O � � O V�'o ' \
crA o �o m -+� z CD
O 9 o 37 G s G) `-'' CC' s
2 -Z.S3) m -yv,, N 0 ,,,dip.
'{ o N m G� o CD
m oo .n ��`z 3� �
Z u) 73 om m "' \ ?i
�' a O
01 O m
S
� Gr� -
O 5- o C- Zo g
-4 C00 c) -
v
C-,-, -4 �O o
-n 5. n N 2'
' Wu% z
37
CP mm amm -...c
�m O .22
"'Q
Cil 51 73 7 C, 2 �
. . O
illa o .. �'
3 m0NQ03 �cn
Cn
n
NA
4. Z3A
0y w
0
ea
m c
co m O
N 0
co 0
woo
. G s 0 -ovi
0 r 0m �cc I. O
VII `L n O 6Z � t — V.
C') mZ ny0 .�
Z
-O -0 --Y... A 0Z :t\.
T -v O .Wi Oco 1`' o O.
came 1
2i
-::"-kv 2 �Zw
2 Z .23 �,�� � o CD
05. N m�� 3
7 Zct, 0� a - O
otp c- Go
-d'
A vo � oat� Cy
O 5. 0 37 2
ANo n a � v v
v �
� G
< m ?
N •
•
�-cl -o mOo
W
Q
po � N
't--
-� �
02 tc4
.... OZ '
O 2 �
)
COva .t
1
rn am% mAt
•-p... , O uQ
� m N mo
� o37
v
2 � �p o
2 ��o
mm
2 \.i. ocsl •- • 7j
/3 G- Z.. ' ' ' ,:k--A V Ekt
r Nil IAA .4
y
1
Z cp CP
73
S CD
-a m cal '
0 o
'0 SW
O CO
ao CD '13
m'. om-o r a v r 0
17 0,c.Z X00 - 1J
frt cn _ m U' m?, �J.
0 Zu' O oz -t
0 cr) 0 cil 0-0. 0 \ ' r:::, 6-- \:-.. ...._--:
-o -az za 0
--1 CP Z GZ n
7o �vmo � z tQ
� o
O oo O
N -n
O Z � zw
Z z 0 C. rn D7 co 4 U)
= o5 ccr) m� v N• o
G 5
m 70 0 1-1)--
JI
r � r .0 5.� _a
232 G coo 0 -2
O 3;3' -7 .- ?• 2 0
= Oo 0 c) G) Z• n
m vwZ
m �Z =zN
-0 m o o Ir
�� ?1 O r o
O oc, a� Z
CA m
m z 4 a� 0 c>
4 �Z y � Oo '�
' y111 4OQfn mQ
' 0 o Gm
= cnmzm �vO ma
r
0 mm Z 40
0
a R
rn OZ -4 � o
w
?..:7..„ ....4 , o� G
-....
t7
C
n
co c.5.04
co
03. sm a
co o
CD el
�erfD
O LO G F
00
z °
-o m O , r •
O
O N O r G) � 0 77
73m mZZ
to m o
CD
O
O o '
73 Wim ? =�w � ��
GO. o �y CID
Zj)
N
y o5. W m �� �3
,1 0� O o�on
m -1 ,` Q 111 r -4 ,..)*3S .
Z %
rTtU37
SO j .7.1G .)
r- � Z --A --Am
OCA aZ
'1 0 O 2 ?�a a O
O Z G'O o 0
‘SWI
a� z 53
- Qo � m
�
rcA O. nm
ffc0 co�
r: O � a
cp
r o mmm� �7 as
G Z
1
in
/
Z�
G
Z (' trl
73 513 CD
CD cr. CD
z o m `a
ill 0
m �
c C03 0 L w wool
__ 0 rn c2.4O
o
. -k 0
n zc. � 4 5z
� w_ o off.
r m •zi G) w O
mj NZ 'A co w 4a vQ.
O pm G-
0 'F.:8 et
P
-n � -4 ov
O Ow Cr) t. (D
zoC 'P 51
,o C2- Zi 59
-4 G) G F =p -C
N 0 woo'
D -1 N copO -
T11 • m ()
:4 73 0 a2', 70 (5-2.- ?.- S
03 cri crfc,) 73 m Z
111 73, Z. I...)N
-g1 - Co
. m =o ;
�Oo 70 -
Cr) 0U, m S
oo
rn zoz C._)cD0
5. pvp
T T1 n p o \::.
�_
=o G z p0
0 o.23 g° � G0 � .
TI 0 UP NOG_2
��
�m O om O
1 m rrt -.40 .-a
G -3(7)7. O O )
CP -4 � CI � �
-0 rn o o m m 73 ix, �
G2 �
\-4o
N �w
C.;13 i,"
C� mm_ Z �-
rn'37.73 oz �m
r- � m 70 m m �
m
--4 A
"-' Z ��
._1)6
73 OJo,0
mz
co
-a `•° o
to iza
SO
er-
n T- p
C
mr 0 Zs
yo 0mill
0
r-,-,„... 735, ? iO °-, •
c?"A U' m �
m m Vyr,Z
-O m Z
111 �a AJ• �Z n 7 7T
o va m Z tQ
w
Z W o- 0
O p Gi m O 7 cin ) fi
0 G fn n n u' N• o co
m �� 3
7 yc 5. 70 ow_11 J1
� a
VA � O
� G O -0 .....0p -$.";_)-Z C)n Z
73
Z oo O a�z
m USO 5j ---+ G n 't-
VA r? m
Z Z N �'
•nil G Z W Q ,___\O . . n (1) 5 <s j_,‘,
illZ m G+ --k o 9. `_ ,
CP 03 ° t
� amm
m ZQ
' m4 au) 0 Wi
Cr)
7 m _73 ym CJ� 0r v
�
CG p n
y
O
y
5 137
Z (1) LO
rm mCA
G G to
G CD
co , Z� m ( C\ S
r
r m o G, 0.73�? % N 0
55mmcmnz
Z n
m wLim
n m 0
O V'Z� Go \-.
`
cnO C.-"'2)
Z om
fi �1
cri 73 m
mT,W
m R' �va
?,tomp zs
T -- a, oaop
O g o Or
-0
�n,7 O mZ mo
� o-
G) to = oO N 3 r+'
m �� �000 (D
o Z ? !�
94 93 Ov � y
m O � o C. � o
0 o �U) 0NmC)
m oo O oo a C
--,,,mr�- yrnoo
r
' m aoo 'r� oc)
oo�
O i Z o rci
m <G R'
ill z 10
-o U7 O z37 `'
r
m O Z VO � �
.0 r"1:1 O R1
- 0 3 3,?._.
illO -n
y O O ...-1 = O
U, C) m z �J
O
G-) oz
7
- 0
01 r z \_)
Z
civ = CD
CPcD CO
e
c O `�— CD
m Zynm S
o73 r- o •
111 Z
r5.m�m `�° 1 Or � m ? - �
�' 5. oo .
z --4 �
rn G. t
zTh O oz • -, 1
Cr) --k 0 'Fr,36 73, p it (0 ..rtret.
f �m , 0 z
m0Z � Z nzm m f-) •P m IPQ
y 0 rnz tO
"VIr a r o `‘. - CD
73 r- CP 5 ------1 CO C=. *. ,A, .--..t,
n 37 •Z AZ `s' * 1 Q- 0
Z Z3 GI m� 37 CD
Gm r -4y •• o CD
-n � - m
13 o
Q� m m , a
mo -u mi O o
0! X0
O 5.o 73 oo� a, �.
U, 5 � Zo : _' C)
m 9n 91 O a��z v
m CZ =ZN
-n -0 m moo r
�� o �� 1
v cr
o o
_ ' 5. Z m
o o
ill z5. 4 zoo O
rzm � o O . -
z+ 73 Nom Ti.
0 03 (10) m yo Q
1 m °, -4 z70 '7371
a TA Q
tit rn Q "(2) 'Z. m
70no= 0
v o m mmi
3mo
'
o N -13 3,
73 �
J ---1 -37 O ar
I ?,�, Z moo
17 av ...4 --A
,
PAZ .....,.,1'
41 C)
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAME—FIRST NAME—MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD,COUNCIL,COMMISSION,AUTHORITY,OR COMMITTEE
Andrew I. Solis Collier County Board of County Commissioners
MAILING ADDRESS THE BOARD,COUNCIL,COMMISSION,AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON
3299 East Tamiami Trail WHICH I SERVE ISA UNIT OF:
CITY COUNTY ❑CITY afCOUNTY ❑OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
Naples Collier NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED Collier County
June 12, 2018 MY POSITION IS:
d ELECTIVE Cl APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of
interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
would inure to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also MUST ABSTAIN from knowingly voting on
a measure which would inure to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained
(including the parent, subsidiary, or sibling organization of a principal by which he or she is retained);to the special private gain or loss of a
relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies(CRAs) under
Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited
from voting in that capacity.
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law,
mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A"business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner,joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder(where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above,you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are
abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting,who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you are not prohibited by Section 112.3143 from otherwise
participating in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision,
whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
• You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision)with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting,who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on page 2)
CE FORM 8B-EFF.1112013 PAGE 1
Adopted by reference in Rule 34-7.010(1)(f),F.A.C.
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
• A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
• The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
• You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
• You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting,who must incorporate the form in the minutes.A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
Andrew I. Solis , hereby disclose that on June 12 20 18
(a)A measure came or will come before my agency which(check one or more)
inured to my special private gain or loss;
inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate,
inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, ;
inured to the special gain or loss of a client of my law firm by
whom I am retained;or
inured to the special gain or loss of ,which
is the parent subsidiary,or sibling organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b)The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
On June 12, 2018, the Board of County Commissioners will consider Agenda Item 16-A-4, a recommendation to
approve final acceptance and unconditional conveyance of the potable water and sewer utility facilities for
LaMorada(FKA Indian Hills Estates), and authorize the County Manager, or his designee, to release the Final
Obligation Bond in the total amount of$4,000 to the Project Engineer or the Developer's designated agent.
WCI Communities, LLC, is a client of my law firm and in an abundance of caution, I will abstain from voting
pursuant to Section 286.012, Fla. Stat. to avoid any perceived prejudice or bias.
If disclosure of specific information would violate confidentiality or privilege pursuant to law or rules governing attorneys, a public officer,
who is also an attorney, may comply with the disclosure requirements of this section by disclosing the nature of the interest in such a way
as to provide the public with notice of the conflict.
June 12, 2018 /
Date Filed Signa
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT,
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED$10,000.
CE FORM 8B-EFF.11/2013 PAGE 2
Adopted by reference in Rule 34-7.010(1)(f),F.A.C.
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Donna Fiala
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
JUNE 12, 2018
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS (none requiring Ex Parte)
CONSENT AGENDA
16.A.7. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required
to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the minor final plat
of Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Phase 1B, Application Number
PL20180001084.
® NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ❑Meetings (Correspondence ❑e-mails ❑Calls
16.A.8 This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required
to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the amended final
plat of Vanderbilt Reserve, (Application Number PL20180000356) approval of
the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of
the amount of the performance security.
® NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ❑Meetings ❑Correspondence ❑e-mails ❑Calls
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Donna Fiala
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
JUNE 12, 2018
SUMMARY AGENDA
17.A. This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required
to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending
Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development
Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the
unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate
zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein
described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a
Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district for the project
known as Torres Family Trust CPUD to allow development of up to 60,000
S .
square feet of gross floor area of commercial uses including air conditioned
mini self-storage war v: ``µ° . .R allowing assisted living facilities at a floor
area ratio of.E0 and by providing an effective date. The property consists of
±5.8 acres and is located on the south side of US 41, approximately one-half
mile southeast of Manatee Road and, opposite and southeast from Naples
Reserve Boulevard, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida. [P120160000226] (This is a companion to Agenda Item 17.B)
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
X SEE FILE ZMeetings Correspondence Xe-mails XCalls
Met w/ Rich Yovanovich & Bob Mulhare, Many emails and phone calls from residents of the
surrounding communities, spoke with members of the Planning Commission, Staff Report
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Penny Taylor
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
June 12, 2018
CONSENT AGENDA
16.A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
16.A.7. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required
to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the minor final plat
of Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Phase 1B, Application Number
PL20180001084.
XX NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ❑Meetings ❑Correspondence e-mails nCalls
16.A.8. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required
to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the amended final
plat of Vanderbilt Reserve, (Application Number PL20180000356) approval of
the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of
the amount of the performance security.
X NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE Meetings (Correspondence ne-mails nCalls
17. SUMMARY AGENDA
17.A. This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required
to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending
Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development
Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the
unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate
zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein
described real property from a Rural Agricultural zoning district to a
Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district for the project
known as Torres Family Trust CPUD to allow development of up to 60,000
square feet of gross floor area of commercial uses including air conditioned
mini self-storage warehousing, and allowing assisted living facilities at a floor
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Penny Taylor
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
June 12, 2018
area ratio of .60 and by providing an effective date. The property consists of
±5.8 acres and is located on the south side of US 41, approximately one-half
mile southeast of Manatee Road and, opposite and southeast from Naples
Reserve Boulevard, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida. [PL20160000226] (This is a companion to Agenda Item 17.B)
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ®Meetings [Correspondence se-mails ECalls
Met with Rich Yovanovich &Bob Mulhere on Monday, June 11, 2018 and spoke
with staff
Ex parte Items - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr.
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
JUNE 12, 2018
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
CONSENT AGENDA
16.A.7. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required
to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the minor final plat
of Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Phase 1B, Application Number
PL20180001084.
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE (Meetings (Correspondence re-mails FiCalls
16.A.8.
This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all
participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to
approve for recording the amended final plat of Vanderbilt Reserve,
(Application Number PL20180000356) approval of the standard form
Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the
amount of the performance security.
VI NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ❑Meetings fiCorrespondence Re-mails ❑Calls
Ex parte Items - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr.
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
JUNE 12, 2018
SUMMARY AGENDA
17.A. This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required
to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending
Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development
Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the
unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate
zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein
described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a
Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district for the project
known as Torres Family Trust CPUD to allow development of up to 60,000
square feet of gross floor area of commercial uses including air conditioned
mini self-storage warehousing, and allowing assisted living facilities at a floor
area ratio of .60 and by providing an effective date. The property consists of
±5.8 acres and is located on the south side of US 41, approximately one-half
mile southeast of Manatee Road and, opposite and southeast from Naples
Reserve Boulevard, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida. [PL20160000226] (This is a companion to Agenda Item 17.B)
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ><Meetings ( (Correspondence ®e-mails Calls
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Burt L. Saunders
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
JUNE 12, 2018
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
CONSENT AGENDA
16.A.7. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required
to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the minor final plat
of Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Phase 1B, Application Number
PL20180001084.
IX NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ❑Meetings ❑Correspondence ❑e-mails (Calls
16.A.8.
This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by
Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all
participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to
approve for recording the amended final plat of Vanderbilt Reserve,
(Application Number PL20180000356) approval of the standard form
Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the
amount of the performance security.
XJ NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE PiMeetings ❑Correspondence I le-mails ❑Calls
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Burt L. Saunders
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
JUNE 12, 2018
SUMMARY AGENDA
17.A. This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required
to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending
Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development
Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the
unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate
zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein
described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a
Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district for the project
known as Torres Family Trust CPUD to allow development of up to 60,000
square feet of gross floor area of commercial uses including air conditioned
mini self-storage warehousing, and allowing assisted living facilities at a floor
area ratio of .60 and by providing an effective date. The property consists of
±5.8 acres and is located on the south side of US 41, approximately one-half
mile southeast of Manatee Road and, opposite and southeast from Naples
Reserve Boulevard, in Section 12, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida. [PL20160000226] (This is a companion to Agenda Item 17.B)
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ®Meetings ❑Correspondence ❑e-mails ❑Calls
Meeting with Rich Yovanovich and Bob Mulhere
Ex parte Items - Commissioner Andy Solis
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
June 12, 2018
CONSENT AGENDA
16.A.7. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing
be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for
recording the minor final plat of Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Phase 1B,Application Number
PL20180001084.
X NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE [Meetings [Correspondence ❑e-mails nCalls
16.A.8. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing
be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for
recording the amended final plat of Vanderbilt Reserve, (Application Number PL20180000356)
approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the
amount of the performance security.
Fi NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE UMeetings LCorrespondence [e-mails [Calls
SUMMARY AGENDA
17.A. This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members.Should a hearing be
held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an
Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development
Code,which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of
Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the
zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A)zoning
district to a Commercial Planned Unit Development(CPUD)zoning district for the project known as
Torres Family Trust CPUD to allow development of up to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area of
commercial uses including air conditioned mini self-storage warehousing, and allowing assisted
living facilities at a floor area ratio of.60 and by providing an effective date.The property consists of
±5.8 acres and is located on the south side of US 41,approximately one-half mile southeast of
Manatee Road and, opposite and southeast from Naples Reserve Boulevard, in Section 12,Township
51 South, Range 26 East,Collier County, Florida. [P120160000226] (This is a companion to Agenda
Item 17.B)
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ®Meetings Correspondence [e-mails nCalls
6/8/18— Rick Yovanovich & Bob Mulhere
GoodnerAngela
Subject: Rich Yovanovich, Bob Mulhere: Torres Family Trust PUD.
Location: Cohen &Grigsby (9110 Strada PI, Naples, FL, United States)
Start: Fri 6/8/2018 1:30 PM
End: Fri 6/8/2018 2:00 PM
Recurrence: (none)
Meeting Status: Meeting organizer
Organizer: andy.solis@colliercountyfl.gov
Required Attendees: Andrew I. Solis (ASolis@cohenlaw.com)
Categories: Mercato Office
Good afternoon,
Rich would like to meet with the Commissioner on the upcoming June 12th agenda item:Torres Family Trust PUD.
Availability:
Monday June 4th—1:00—4:00
Tuesday June 5th: 9:00—12:00, 3:30
Friday June 8th: 9:00, 1:00—4:00
Monday June 11th: 9:00-4:00
Thank you.
Dianna Quintanilla
Legal Assistant to
Richard D.Yovanovich, Esq.
cid:image003.png@01D30138.B0D48370
The Northern Trust Building
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34103
P: 239.435.3535 I F: 239.435.1218
dquintanilla@cyklawfirm.com
Visit cyklawfirm.com to learn more about us.
cid:image005.jpg@01D30138.B0D48370
1
GrecoSherry
From: Dianna Quintanilla <DQuintanilla@cyklawfirm.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 1:16 PM
To: GrecoSherry
Subject: RE: Meeting Request: Torres Family Trust
Confirmed, thanks so much.
Dianna Quintanilla
C y Kh,
Legal Assistant to
Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq.
The Northern Trust Building
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34103
P: 239.435.3535 1 F: 239.435.1218 COLEMAN I Y O V A N V i C H 1 K O E T E R
dquintanilla(a.cvklawfirm.com
Visit cyklawfirm.com to learn more about us.
s t t f,►
a
Trusted & Verified
tp�� i
From: GrecoSherry [mailto:Sherry.Greco@colliercountyfl.gov]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 12:08 PM
To: Dianna Quintanilla
Subject: RE: Meeting Request: Torres Family Trust
Good afternoon,
So sorry for not getting back to you.
I have Monday, June 11th at 9:30 AM booked for you. Please confirm that is suitable for you.
%%Miry Greco
Executive Coordinator to
Commissioner Penny Taylor, District 4
239-252-8604
Fax 239-252-6393
Sherry.Greco@colliercountyfl.gov
1
Click here to sign up for our District 4 newsletter
From: Dianna Quintanilla [mailto:DQuintanilla@cyklawfirm.com]
Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2018 11..52 AM
To: GrecoSherry<Sherry.Greco@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: RE: Meeting Request:Torres Family Trust
Just following up on the email below:
Dates that are left:
Tuesday June 5th: 11:30, 1:00
Friday June 8th: 1:00 -4:00
Monday June 11th: 9:00-4:00
Dianna Quintanilla
CYK
Legal Assistant to
Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq.
The Northern Trust Building
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34103
P: 239.435.35351 F: 239.435.1218 COLEMAN I YOVANOVICiri i KOESTER
dquintanilla(a�cyklawfirm.com
Visit cyklawfirm.com to learn more about us.
.0 y s t r;
. Trusted & Verified
p of
From: Dianna Quintanilla
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:26 PM
To: GrecoSherry (Sherry.Greco(acolliercountyfl.gov)
Subject: Meeting Request: Torres Family Trust
Good afternoon,
Rich would like to meet with the Commissioner on the upcoming June 12th agenda item: Torres
Family Trust PUD.
Availability:
Monday June 4th - 1:00 -4:00
Tuesday June 5th: 9:00 - 12:00, 3:30
Friday June 8th: 9:00, 1:00 -4:00
Monday June 11th: 9:00-4:00
2
FilsonSue
Subject: Rich Yovanovich 435-3535 re 6-12-18 agenda item, Torres Family rust PUD
Location: BCC Office
Start: Mon 6/4/2018 1:00 PM
End: Mon 6/4/2018 1:30 PM
Recurrence: (none)
Organizer: McDanielBill
Good afternoon,
Rich would like to meet with the Commissioner on the upcoming June 12th agenda item: Torres
Family Trust PUD.
Availability:
Monday June 4th - 1:00 -4:00
Tuesday June 5th: 9:00 - 12:00, 3:30
Friday June 8th: 9:00, 1:00-4:00
Monday June 11th: 9:00-4:00
Thank you.
Dianna Quintanilla
CYK
Legal Assistant to
Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq.
Inc Northern Trust Building
4001 Tamiami Trail North Suite 300
Naples, Florian 34103
P. 239 435 3535 1 F: 1218
dquintanilla a(2cvklawfirm.com
Visit cvklawfirm.com to learn more about us.
:Trusted & Verified
Thank you.
Dianna Quintanilla
CYK
Legal Assistant to
Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq.
The Northern Trust Building
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34103
P: 239.435.3535 1 F: 239.435.1218 COLEMAN I YOVANOVICH 1 KOESTER
dquintanillacyklawfirm.com
Visit cyklawfirm.com to learn more about us.
y+t tpt,
4.3 ,,,„
0.
• , ,
..,
p Trusted & Verified
,,t,
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a
public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
3
FilsonSue
Subject: Rich Yovanovich 435-3535 re 6-12-18 agenda item, Torres Family rust PUD
Location: BCC Office
Start: Mon 6/4/2018 1:00 PM
End: Mon 6/4/2018 1:30 PM
Recurrence: (none)
Organizer: McDanielBill
Good afternoon,
Rich would like to meet with the Commissioner on the upcoming June 12th agenda item: Torres
Family Trust PUD.
Availability:
Monday June 4th - 1:00 -4:00
Tuesday June 5th: 9:00 - 12:00, 3:30
Friday June 8th: 9:00, 1:00-4:00
Monday June 11th: 9:00-4:00
Thank you.
Dianna Quintanilla
CYK
Legal Assistant to
Richard d. Yovanovich, Esq.
The Northern Trust Building
4001 Tamiami Trail North= Suite 300
Naples, Fiorida 34103
P 239 435 3535 I F: 239 435 1218 •
dauintanilla(a)_cvklawfirm.com
Visit cvklawfirm.com to learn more about us.
E�-
s
Trusted & Verified
1
plug smart L-- nY? &A
tnteiiigent energy solutions - �/I //g
To: BCC Members of Collier County, Florida
From: Richard D. Housh, 50 Sixth Avenue North, Naples, Fl. 34102
Re: Existing"Local Vendor Preference"policy in the Collier County Procurement
Ordinance.
Dear Commissioners,
As a long time (nineteen years) resident of Naples and CEO of a Florida incorporated company
which has consistently maintained a local office in Naples, for the past ten years, I would like to
bring to the BCC's attention that under the current"Local Vendor Preference"section of the
Collier County Procurement Ordinance, my Company does not qualify as a "local vendor".
Furthermore, in a recent Request for Proposal in which my Company participated, we were
unjustly penalized 10% of the available points allowed, and finished in second place to a Lee
County based competitor, who this Collier County tax payer would not agree should even be
classified as `local".
I respectfully request that the BCC modify the existing"Local Vendor Preference"policy within
the County Procurement Ordinance, to only apply to Companies where the principals reside and
pay taxes in Collier County, as welt as maintain offices within Collier County. I also respectfully
request that the Director of Procurement and his staff, shall have the authority to determine the
"local vendor"status of Companies which will be exclusively responsible for producing proof of
their Collier County based principals and office locations, as well as duration of same for more
than one full calendar year before being given"local vendor"status and earning the 10% points
associated therewith. This proof may include documentation other than the Collier County
Business Tax Receipt,which is currently the exclusive requirement to be classified as a"local
vendor".
Thank you very much for your consideration of my request and thank you for your service to
those of us who live and work in our great county!
Sincerely,
Rich Housh
50 Sixth Avenue North
Naples
Juice Technologies, Inc. dba Plug Smart
350 E. 1st Avenue, Suite 210, Columbus, OH 43201
Telephone: (800) 518-5576 • Facsimile: (800) 518-5576
Benton Cook ei
Subem. Collier County Business Tax-Certificate.pdt
L7ate; June 12,2018 at 8:30 AM
To: Rich Housh
Amount was$9 as on the Certificate
COWEN COUNTY OUS9IES4 TAX ENXSINESS TAX NUSSOFP- Ittpst
,.'.1C€ kt„.:X.:10Y 1AX DO I-C. Zel:4*110P,Sts-ICE DEVE mAr,..cs monzIA-34134 ;144 2-4
SI poti*Sitit A-.gime oxx
TWA WOO"•1111*LeS SEM.XI, to
Itttrt
Co MALAY At PLACE OF SUMO'S FOR,PUNIC kftsPecTiok
te.,ATION 500'1,AA 84.0 L1F1E T2 DO SO IS CONTRARY V LOCAL LAWS.
NE ' C1Y AXIS
*tcop7,014% -OHS TAX IS SON-REPO110411LE -
SNESS PHONE.SOO-S13575
4
ATE LIC. DOC-51 8 IAAO-f*O4NO1M*S,
g...kr° 554Fig
X YOUNG 04*S ,
C,'4-*- .7450.E 1ST Ave cio
*4°' e ° eamsOtitazr octo
lMB or EMPLOYEES OELIPLOYDAM 114, ft 40,*-AS4,.."'"F SIRCATION GEAFRN 1:ION'RAD'OP C.
DAIE 02002420'6
AMOUNT ))
ASSIFXA.TION CO3E WO '
lEMIT rlAw 4`:
5 5=45t5itr. t P-tv-ibm*r.,. *A 55 Mt 5,0515Vit -)felsto, Itoottic,
vas mr/X 4714'444 4Vak15 Ely fetitittl soNtatori rxre tana a'Ws tag* ?aim, It' Ralf
*As pl
vws, trir inutmer 11:yr sr"ottw-taws prs*at orerra$ rxtmorei by Am Aikk.
poaLt ,
6/z.2.21,5.
NOTES FOR TALK AT THE MEETING OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING. (JUNE 12, 2018 )
I WILL READ FROM MY NOTES UNTIL MY ALLOWED TIME ENDS. MY
NOTES WILL BE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
IT SEEMS ALMOST UNBELIEVABLE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS NOT
HAD A MUNICIPAL OWNED GOLF COURSE DURING THE PAST 94 YEARS !!
WHY DO YOU THINK THAT IS TRUE?? OVER THE YEARS, MUNICIPAL
GOVERMENTS ALL OVER THE COUNTRY AND THE WORLD HAVE HAD
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSES (MUNIS)AND STILL HAVE THEM.
HOWEVER,THERE ARE MORE THAN 75 GOLF COURSE IN THIS VERY
WEALTHY COUNTY. MOST ARE TOO EXPENSIVE FOR COMMON PEOPLE.
I AM A COMMON PERSON, THAT BY DEFINTION, IS ONE WHO LACKS
THE CHARACTERISTIC OF HAVING POWER WHEN I TOLD THAT TO THE
COUNTY PLANNING GROUP,A MEMBER LAUGHED. I HAVE REACHED OUT
TO MANY OTHER PEOPLE WHO I THOUGHT HAD THE POWER TO MAKE A
MUNI POSSIBLE IN COLLIER COUNTY AND I HAVE BEEN VERY
DISAPPOINTED.
MANY COMMON PEOPLE IN COLLIER COUNTY, INCLUDING VISITORS,
CANNOT AFFORD TO PLAY GOLF IN COLLIER. OUR COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS HAVE SOME POWER TO ESTABLISH A MUNICIPAL GOLF
COURSE IN COLLIER COUNTY. HOWEVER IT SEEMS THAT IT COST MORE
THAN YOUR WILLING TO APPROVE FOR GOLF FOR THE COMMON PEOPLE,
AND YOU HAVE INDICATED THAT A GOLF COURSE WOULD NOT GAIN A
PROFIT ENOUGH TO PAY ITS OWN WAY.
A RECENT LETTER TO THE EDITOR, MAY 2, 2018, SUBJECT, " COST OF
GOLF COURSE VS. WATERPARK,",POINTS OUT THAT COLLIER COUNTY
SUPPORTS OTHER PARKS THAT MAY NOT SHOW LARGE PROFITS SUCH AS
WATERPARKS AND LARGE PLAYING FIELDS WITH LIGHTS, ETC. I HAVE
MET WITH PARKS AND RECREATIONS AND HAVE OVER 40 COPIES OF
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR AND ARTICALS ABOUT THE GOLF COURSE
CONVERSION AND THE NEED FOR AFFORDABLE GOLF IN COLLIER
COUNTY.
ON JANUARY 18,2016 54 LAKEWOOD EQUITY MEMBERS VOTED YES
FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATION FOR THE
SALE OF LAKEWOOD COUNTRY CLUB. AT THAT TIME THERE WERE ONLY
66 EQUITY MEMBERS, WHO WERE THE OWNERS OF THE CLUB AT THAT
TIME. THE BOARD THOUGHT IT NESESSARY TO ASK FOR THIS VOTE DUE
TO DECREASED REVENUES.
I AM CURRENTLY A EQUITY GOLF MEMBER OF LAKEWWOOD
COUNTY CLUB, AND BECAUSE OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN THE LAST FEW
1
D. Lighting shall be fully shielded and directed so as to prevent glare on adjacent
residential or TTRVC zoned properties.
E. Outdoor amplified sound is prohibited, except in conjunction with an approved
temporary use permit and in such limited cases shall be restricted to the hours of
11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
F. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any
rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the
permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations
imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a
violation of state or federal law.
G. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before
commencement of the development. '£�t x c 2 5 / t�
Cae./
H. An Enhanced 15 foot wide Type D buffer shall be provide along US 41
(Tamiami Trail East). In addition to the required canopy trees he buffer shall
include a continuous undulating double hedgerow spaced 3' on center. Plantings
shall be 3 gallon and at least 24" in height at time of planting for first row hedges
(closest to the right-of-way) and 4 gallon and at least 24" in height at the time of
planting for the second row of hedges.
Page 14 of 14
H:\2016\2016009\WP\PUDZ\Post CCPC\Torres Family Trust CPUD(PL-20160000226)(5-7-2018).docx
4614011.114,14010410
t,:crier County I7A
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: MAY 3,2018
SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20160000226;TORRES FAMILY TRUST
COMPANION ITEM: PL20160002771/CPSS-2016-2
PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENTS:
Owner: Agents:
Torres Family Holdings, LLC Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Richard D.Yovanovich,Esq.
7742 Alico Road Hole Montes,Inc. Coleman,Yovanovich&Koester,P.A.
Fort Myers, FL 33912 950 Encore Way 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples,FL 34110 Naples,FL 34103
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an
application to rezone property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Commercial
Planned Unit Development(CPUD)zoning district. The subject property is one vacant parcel and
is owned by Torres Family Holdings,LLC.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject property is located on the south side of US 41, approximately one-half mile southeast
of Manatee Road and, opposite and southeast of Naples Reserve Boulevard, in Section 12,
Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 5.8+/- acres (see
location map on page 2).
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This petition seeks to rezone the property to CPUD to allow for the development of up to 60,000
square feet(SF)of gross floor area of commercial uses including air-conditioned mini-self-storage
warehousing,and allowing assisted living facilities at a floor area ratio of 0.60.
PUDZ-PL20160000226; Torres Family Trust Page 1 of 15
Revised:April 6,2018
*
4 0 • !
, A ,
70*CI
(D C
5 0 .
ff,' r.:,
..., lini
,--.
),rs,
.C.,
L... a.,'
A I
LTD4 oc'
....al Par lanta" gar aik., i I
0 CD
cx,....,
cn
A
. *
..... . trilattioir .0 i i
@-,
N mr- Inalv•
77 4 .PUO '
4
...z
,.. ,, At ettitisit it*
--4
2 .
ti, .....,.... i
SIPOttIttt
1 LOC TION .
7....N.N..\\\... ... .
a&till
11
No A A PA I
PROJECT
LOCATION
_ .N.N.
., " ....... NI
...,...t....444*" ”..., rAY
ka'
_ 1,---"`-t4.1.
1. .47 El 4 4 t
t..,<,....4.3i
._._ ..\\ .....1,...PA,....„
. .
.—
) 0
'8
,-7 -...., .,,...,......1.-E7"-...._ IP- - P°
10,1
..
4.4 lc,
girN
. 1.111-1
...=...., s-,..
If '\n........._,
,....,.. ,..,,,
co
al.,...
toroal3
n.,
2. Location Map Zoning Map
Petition Number: PL20160000226
Y
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
This section of the staff report identifies the land uses, zoning classifications, and maximum
approved densities for properties surrounding boundaries of the Torres Family Trust CPUD:
North: Tamiami Trail East, a six-lane arterial roadway, and then single and multi-
family homes with a current zoning designation of Walnut Lakes PUD (3.0
dwelling units per acre [DU/AC]) and is approved for single and multi-family
homes.
East: Developed with travel trailers and recreational vehicles, with a current zoning
designation of Travel-Trailer Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC)
District(12 DU/AC)known as Imperial Wilderness R.V. Resort
South: Developed with travel trailers and recreational vehicles, with a current zoning
designation of Travel-Trailer Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC)
District(12 DU/AC)known as Imperial Wilderness R.V. Resort
West: Developed residential, with a current zoning designation of Marco
Shores/Fiddlers Creek PUD (2.08 DU/AC) and is approved for single and
multi-family residential units, churches,and group care facilities
, -,
: �h � .,zr 8yR S + _ .ryy..
'4i4 13 ft
e . iv L ;01,,, t
'3rif 3 't t t E *wk1
! ;t .4i
M X K. �Cj-4 ..
'T''
�V3 `111'.
A ,-5 �`..
,� ffffffPPPrrs
.'RE
�
� 1
r�"�9{ � 45 m
I OSf n,,..1-04y N-t ;74
K
as z 4 ,U-''9 T to 4as
t"18 t t 34^ F.
' 1 1 li 7^,':34::'''''744"111t,11:',.L,,4 r.
Aerial(C'aun°.GIS)
PUDZ-PL20160000226;Torres Family Trust Page 3 of 15
Revised:April 6.2018
1
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP)CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban Mixed Use
District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, as identified on the Future Land Use Map within the
GMP. This petition is not consistent with any of the Urban Mixed Use District's Subdistricts that
allow commercial zoning; it relies, in part, on a companion Small-Scale GMP Amendment
(SSBGPA) to the FLUE provisions toward achieving consistency. That amendment [ref.
PL20160002771/CPSS-2016-2] establishes the East Tamiami Trail Commercial Infill Subdistrict.
Based upon the analysis,the proposed PUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP,
contingent, in part, upon the companion GMP Amendment being adopted and going into effect.
The PUD Ordinance needs to provide for the effective date to be linked to an effective date of the
companion GMP Amendment. (see Attachment B—FLUE Consistency Review)
Transportation Element: In evaluating this project,staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact
Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the
2015 and 2017 Annual Update and Inventory Reports(AUIR).
Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states:
"The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications,
conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element
(FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development,
with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall
not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway
segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that
is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway
segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to
operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning
period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application
has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following
occur:
a. For links(roadway segments)directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal
to or exceeds 2%of the adopted LOS standard service volume;
b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to
or exceeds 2%of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and
c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where
it is equal to or exceeds 3%of the adopted LOS standard service volume.
Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant
and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant
impacts on all roadways."
The proposed Rezone on the subject property was reviewed based on the then applicable 2015
AUIR Inventory Report. The TIS submitted in the application indicates that the proposed C-3
commercial development will generate approximately 425 PM peak hour unadjusted two-way
trips. Staff also reviewed this rezone request using the now current 2017 AUIR as part of this staff
PUDZ-PL20160000226 Torres Family Trust Page 4 of 15
Revised:April 6, 2018
report. The proposed development will impact the following roadway segments with the listed
capacities in the below table.
Roadway Link 2015 2015 Current 2017 2017 2017
AUIR Remaining Peak Hour , AUIR Remaining
LOS Capacity Peak Direction LOS Capacity
Service
Volume/Peak
Direction
Tamiami Collier B 2,067 3,100/East B 2,089
Trail East Boulevard
(US 41) to Joseph
Lane
Tamiami Joseph B 1,057 2,000/East B 1,075
Trail East Lane to
(US 41) Greenway
Road
Tamiami Greenway D 230 1,075/East D 248
Trail East Road to
(US 41) San Marco
Drive
*Please note: 2015 and 2017 AUIR totals do not include the recently completed improvements
on US 41. These trip totals are anticipated to improve with the 2018 AUIR.
Based on the 2015 and 2017 AUIR, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to
accommodate the proposed new trips for the proposed rezone within the 5-year planning period.
Therefore, the subject petition can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation
Element of the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order
(SDP or Plat).
Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff
found this project to be consistent with the CCME. A minimum of 0.80 acre of native vegetation
is required to be retained for the PUD.
GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as
this proposed rezoning. Staff finds the proposed rezone to be consistent with the GMP subject to
the approval of the companion amendment to the GMP, PL20160002771/CPSS-2016-2.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria
upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code
(LDC) Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as
the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission
Report(referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's
PUDZ-PL20160000226;Torres Family Trust Page 5 of 15
Revised:April 6, 2018
recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for their
recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning
or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the
heading"Zoning Services Analysis." In addition,staff offers analyses in the below sections.
Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD
Document to address environmental concerns. This project does not require review by the
Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land
development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193
of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. A minimum of 0.80 acre of native vegetation
is required to be retained for the PUD.
The subject property is located within the boundary of the Deltona Settlement Agreement as shown
on the exhibits in the Settlement Agreement, but documentation provided by the applicant shows
that the property was never owned by the Deltona Corporation. The County Attorney Office has
since reviewed the title report submitted by the applicant and opined, based on the documents
provided by the applicant,that the Deltona Corporation never owned the parcel and as a result,the
applicant could not be bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Research by the Real
Property Department did not find any evidence of ownership by Deltona. In addition, The
Conservancy of SW Florida,representative for the conservation group interveners who are signee
to the Deltona Settlement Agreement, issued a letter stating that they have no objection to the
application.
Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance
with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project.
Utilities Review: Public Utilities staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and
the LDC and recommends approval of this project.
Emergency Management Review: Emergency Management staff has reviewed the petition for
compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and recommends approval of this project.
Landscape Review: The Master Plan shows a 0.8 acre preserve along the south boundary of the
PUD. The Master Plan also notes that the preserve may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer
requirement after removal of exotics. In the event that all or part of the preserve does not meet the
requirements of the buffer,supplemental planting will be provided in accordance with 4.06.02 and
4.06.05.E.1 of the LDC to meet buffer requirements.The Master Plan shows a 10'Type'D' Buffer
along the West,and a 15'Type'D' Buffer along the North.There are two different buffers depicted
along the East boundary. One is a Type 'B' Buffer. This buffer is labeled as 25' and this is wider
than the buffer required by the LDC.The other buffer shown along the east boundary is a 10'Type
'A' adjacent to an area labeled as a Collier County Water-Sewer Parcel. This parcel is zoned
agricultural.
Zoning Services Review: Staff has evaluated the uses proposed and their intensities, and the
development standards such as building heights, setbacks, and landscape buffers. Staff also
PUDZ-PL20160000226;Torres Family Trust Page 6 of 15
Revised:April 6,2018
evaluated the building mass,building location and orientation, the amount and type of open space
and its location, and traffic generation/attraction of the proposed uses.
The amount of allowable square footage being requested is 60,000 SF of various commercial uses,
which may include air-conditioned, enclosed, mini-self-storage warehousing, and assisted living
facilities at a floor area ratio of 0.60. The East Tamiami Trail Infill Subdistrict is a companion
SSGMPA, which will create a site-specific future land use Subdistrict. The proposed uses within
the Torres Family Trust CPDD will be consistent with the condition in this East.Tamiami Trail
Infill Subdistrict. There are public facilities and services available consistent with the levels of
service adopted in the GMP, and as defined and implemented through, the Collier County
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance.
Within the proposed Torres Family Trust CPUD boundaries,the minimum setback from US 41 is
35 feet with an eastern boundary setback of 25 feet, a western boundary setback of 25 feet, and a
southern boundary setback of 25 feet from the preserve boundary. The actual building heights are
not to exceed 52 feet, and the zoned heights are not to exceed 45 feet. To the north of the subject
property,the Walnut Lakes PUD has a maximum height of 35 feet for single-family dwellings and
50 feet for multifamily dwellings. To the west, the Marco Shores/Fiddlers Creek PUD has a
maximum height of 60 feet for the golf course and club center, 50 feet for business developments,
35 feet for single-family and duplex dwellings,and 100 feet for multifamily dwellings.To the east
and south, Imperial Wilderness R.V. resort has a maximum height for any recreational facility of
30 feet. The proposed height of the Torres Family Trust CPUD is compatible with the immediate
neighborhoods as the surrounding properties have a variation of maximum heights above and
below the 45-foot zoned building height threshold in the proposed Torres Family Trust CPDD.As
previously stated, a 15-foot wide Type D Buffer is proposed along US 41 on the North side of the
PUD. The Master Plan proposes a 25-foot Type B Buffer along the east PUD boundary,a 10-foot-
wide Type D Buffer along the west PUD boundary, and a .8 acre preserve along the South
boundary of the PUD. As such, the CPUD will be designed to limit commercial uses to provide a
transition from the Fiddlers Creek business district on the west to the recreational vehicle zoned
lands to the south and east. The development standards will provide external setbacks, limitations
on height, and additional buffers to ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses.
PUD FINDINGS:
LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make
findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the
findings in LDC Section 10.02.08":
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in
relation to physical characteristics of the land,surrounding areas, traffic and access,
drainage,sewer,water, and other utilities.
The type and pattern of development proposed should not have a negative impact upon any
physical characteristics of the land, the surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage,
sewer, water, and other utilities. Furthermore, this project, if developed, will be required
PUDZ-PL20160000226; Torres Family Trust Page 7 of 15
Revised:April 6, 2018
to comply with all county regulations regarding drainage, sewer, water and other utilities
pursuant to Section 6.02.00 Adequate Public Facilities of the LDC.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly
as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing
operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or
maintained at public expense.
Documents submitted with the application,which were reviewed by the County Attorney's
Office, demonstrate unified control of the property.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals,objectives,and
policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the
relevant goals, objectives,and policies of the GMP or the companion SSGMPA within the
GMP Consistency portion of this staff report(or within an accompanying memorandum).
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may
include restrictions on location of improvements,restrictions on design,and buffering
and screening requirements.
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding
area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. Please, see
Zoning Services section of this report for a detailed analysis.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the
LDC.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the
Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time
of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to
demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's
development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations
when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site
development plans, are sought.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
The area has adequate supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal systems and
PUDZ-PL20160000226;Torres Family Trust Page 8 of 15
Revised:April 6,2018
potable water supplies to accommodate this project. Furthermore, adequate public
facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations,or as to desirable modifications of such regulations
in the particular case,based on determination that such modifications are justified as
meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such
regulations.
The petitioner is seeking one deviation to allow design flexibility with assisted living
facilities in compliance with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development
Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06.A). This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to
which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from
development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning
district. Staff believes that the deviation proposed can be supported if a portion of the beds
are designated as Medicaid beds, finding, that, in compliance with LDC Section
10.02.13.A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that "the elements may be waived without
detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community" and LDC Section
10.02.13.B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations."
Please, refer to the Deviations Discussion of the staff report below for a more extensive
examination of the deviation located on page 12.
Rezone FindinEs:
LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show
that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the
following when applicable."
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals,objectives,and policies
of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan.
Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP if the companion
SSGMPA is adopted.
2. The existing land use pattern.
The existing land use pattern of the abutting properties is described in the Surrounding
Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the
existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
The subject parcel is of sufficient size and therefore will not result in an isolated district
unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It is also comparable with expected land uses
by virtue of its consistency with the FLUE of the GMP.
PUDZ-PL20160000226; Torres Family Trust Page 9 of 15
Revised:April 6, 2018
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
As shown on the zoning map included at the beginning of this report, the existing district
boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed PUD zoning boundaries follow the property
ownership boundaries and coincide with the GMP subdistrict boundaries. The zoning map
on page 2 of the staff report illustrates the perimeter of the outer boundary of the subject
parcel.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning
necessary.
The proposed change is not necessary but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC
provisions to seek such changes. It should be noted that the proposed uses are not allowed
under the current zoning classification.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD Rezone is consistent with the County's land
use policies that are reflected by the FLUE of the GMP if the companion SSGMPA is
adopted. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD rezone should not adversely
impact living conditions in the area.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of
peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during
construction phases of the development,or otherwise affect public safety.
The roadway infrastructure has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project at this
time.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The proposed development will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore,the project is
subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management
District.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
The PUD Document provides adequate property development regulations to ensure light
and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas. The Master Plan further
demonstrates that the locations of proposed preserve and open space areas should further
ensure light and air should not be seriously reduced in adjacent areas.
PUDZ-PL20160000226;Torres Family Trust Page 10 of 15
Revised:April 6,2018
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent
areas.
This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or
external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including
zoning; however,zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination
is driven by market value.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development
of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
All properties surrounding the subject property are developed, as previously noted. The
basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the LDC is that sound
application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or
subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in
deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed
zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare.
If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment,
then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does
not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined
to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public
interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning.
The proposed uses and development standards cannot be used in accordance with the
existing zoning classification.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or
the County.
It is staff's opinion the proposed PUD rezone is not out of scale with the needs of the
neighborhood or County.
15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed
use in districts already permitting such use.
The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not
specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition.
PUDZ-PL20160000226;Torres Family Trust Page 11 of 15
Revised:April 6, 2018
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which
would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses
under the proposed zoning classification.
Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site
alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state,
and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again
later as part of the building permit process.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and
services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended.
The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00
regarding Adequate Public Facilities(APF),and the project will need to be consistent with
all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities,except
as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff
responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process, and
those staff persons have concluded that no level of service will be adversely impacted with
the commitments contained in the PUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is
determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this rezoning will have
no impact on public facility adequacy in regard to utilities.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners
shall deem important in the protection of the public health,safety, and welfare.
To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing.
DEVIATION DISCUSSION:
The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the requirements of the LDC.The deviation is directly
extracted from PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner's rationale and staff analysis/recommendation is
outlined below.
Proposed Deviation #1: (Group Housing)
"Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.I Group Housing, which establishes a
maximum floor area ratio of 0.45 for care units, assisted living units, continuing care retirement
communities, nursing homes, and dwelling units that are part of an aging-in-place living
environment, to allow a maximum floor area ratio of 0.60 for an Assisted Living Facility,
consistent with the East Tamiami Trail Infill Subdistrict."
Petitioner's Justification:
The design of assisted living facilities has changed in recent years, with ALFs now offering
additional recreational, educational, and health services directly on campus, in addition to
personal services, such as hair salons, banks, health spas, and other concierge services. Living
PUDZ-PL20160000226;Torres Family Trust Page 12 of 15
Revised:April 6,2018
spaces have become larger, as people are generally healthier moving into these communities, and
are looking for a residential space more comparable to an apartment, rather than simply a bed in
a nursing home. The additional floor area ratio will provide flexibility for facilities that provide
multiple stages of care or a variety of unit types.
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff would like to note that recently there has been concern
by the CCPC for petitioners requesting additional floor area for assisted living facilities. It's been
discussed that if petitioners are requesting deviations for additional floor areas of proposed group
housing,then they should provide for Medicaid beds as part of their justification for the deviations.
The inclusion of the dedicated Medicaid beds will assist the County in support of the GMP,
Housing Element, Goal One, "To Create an adequate supply of decent safe, sanitary, and
affordable housing for all residents of Collier County."
On October 5.2017, the CCPC heard the Cleary PUD petition. In this case,the petitioner was also
requesting a maximum FAR of 0.60. The CCPC expressed that the 0.60 FAR was not justified
without the provision of dedicated Medicaid beds. It should be noted that the deviation was
modified to a maximum FAR of 0.50 and approved at the November 14, 2017 BCC meeting.
Based on the above, Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved at 0.50
FAR, mirroring the November 2017 Cleary PUD request. Zoning and Development Review staff
recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section
10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a
detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section
10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public
purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations."
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (MM):
The applicant conducted a NIM on June 29,2017,at the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research
Reserve, The Auditorium at 300 Tower Road in Naples. The meeting commenced at
approximately 5:30 p.m. and ended at 6:30 p.m. The applicant's agent explained the request for
the proposed rezone and the companion SSGMPA.
Bob Mulhere, the agent, gave a presentation and answered questions from attendees. It was
discussed that there would be multiple proposed uses including restaurants and adult living
facilities. He affirmed that there will be no gas stations and that the gas station use is not included
within the proposed uses. There were also general discussions about lighting, preserves, and
buffering. There were concerns from residents of Imperial Wilderness about the clearing of
vegetation near their homes.The NIM summary and sign-in sheet are included in the CCPC backup
materials.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC)REVIEW:
This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did
not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of
the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances.
PUDZ-PL20160000226;Torres Family Trust Page 13 of 15
Revised:April 6,2018
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorneys Office reviewed this stag report on April 2, 2018.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of
approval, with the dedication of a portion of the beds associated with the group housing facility to
Medicaid beds
Attachments:
A) Proposed Ordinance
B) FLUE Consistency Review
C) Correspondence
PUDZ-PL20160000226;Torres Family Trust Page 14 of 15
Revised:April 6,2018
PREPARED BY:
-
TIMOTHY FINN, A 4 P, ;RINCIPAL PLANNER DATE
ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION
REVIEWED BY:
8 (8.)
RAYMO ji V. BELLOWS,ZONING MANAGER iDATE
ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION
3-3o- ik
MIKE BOSI,AICP, DIRECTOR DA IE
ZONING DIVISION
APPROVED BY:
71' /
ES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
Tentative Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date June 12, 2018.
PUDZ-PL20160000226;Torres Family Trust Page 14 of 14
Revised:March 2,2018
BrownleeMichael
From: Denise Hoethke <hoethke@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 8:23 AM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Proposed Self Storage Warehouse Project
NO please vote no. Resident of Reflection lakes Community.
BrownleeMichael
From: Lucyl Lachance <lucyl.lachance@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 2:30 PM
To: FialaDonna
Cc: SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Proposed Self Storage Warehouse Project
Mme Fiala,
We reside in Reflection Lakes at Naples.
Our Board of Directors has brought to our attention that there is a self storage project on US 41 in East Naples
to be built across from our houses.
There is already a self storage project being developed at the bankrupted flea market 2 miles down the road
which is built in front of yet another vehicle storage facility next to a cement plant.
There is plenty of self storage facilities in East Naples. And we already have to deal with a lot of heavy
vehicles traffic in our area.
Therefore we oppose this idea to build another storage facility across from our street.
Lucyl Lachance & Rene Drolet
14111 Mirror Ct
Naples FL 34114
1
BrownleeMichael
From: patcogswel11@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 3:20 PM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Proposed mini self storage warehouses to be built on U.S.41
Dear Collier County Board Member;
I am writing you with regard to the proposed mini self storage warehouses to be built on U.S.41 across from Naples
Reserve Blvd. As a Real Estate Appraiser I have seen East Naples slowly crawling out from under the stigma that it had
been living under. This has occurred primarily due to the new level of quality construction that has been built in this area
over the last decade. With East Naples being one of the few areas for Naples to expand, this high level of construction
will only continue if we maintain that level of quality throughout. That does not include an "industrial looking"
warehouse project being built in the middle of a residential area. You placed a building moratorium on projects of this
"industrial looking" type just so the quality new construction will continue. A care facility is a residential community
project which fits the area; NOT an "industrial looking"warehouse project.
Thank you for your consideration,
Pat Cogswell
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Guy St.Georges <stgeorge@vianet.ca>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 2:02 PM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Self storage warehouse US41 and Naples Reserve Blvd
Dear Ms. Fiala,
I remember your visit to our community with your staff and really appreciated the visibility and transparency you
brought.
I have just been made aware of the above project and object to its location. Not only will it be visible from our
Community but it does lend itself to a residential neighborhood. I would appreciate if you could register my objection
and request that you consider another location.
Thank you
Guy St.Georges
14675 Fern Lake Ct.
Naples, FL 34114
23-919-3455
0 Virus-free. www.avast.com
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Lynn Livingston <redwingnutl @me.com>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 11:16 AM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Self Storage Warehouse
Attachments: Warehouse Fiala.pdf
Dear Commissioner Fiala,
Please read my attached letter.
Thank you,
Aubrey Livingston
14587 Manchester Dr
Naples, FL 34114
1.
BrownleeMichael
From: Kathy Mercier<222mercjr@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 9:10 AM
To: FialaDonna; Burt.Saunders@colliercounty.gov
Cc: SolisAndy; Penny.Taylor@colliercounty.gov; Bill.McDaniel@colliercounty.gov
County Officials,
Information has been brought to all of us home owners in Reflection Lakes, Naples Reserve and Fiddlers Creek about a
proposed commercial structure in our residential area that may be built.
This would be a commercial storage facility on 41 South across from Naples Reserve Blvd. and Reflection Lakes
Community.Also it would boarder behind Fiddlers Creek.
Many of the homes in Reflection Lakes would see this structure from their homes. Anyone driving out of Naples Reserve
would also see this at the end of their beautiful street.
Between Reflection Lakes, Naples Reserve and Fiddlers Creek about 2000 homes would be affected by this eye sore.All
of us in our community would benefit more from stores and restaurants on 41 South as our community expands and
new homes are build on this side of Naples. It is refreshing to know we have finally gotten some stores and restaurants
on Collier and 41. We have enough gas stations, car washes and storage units along 41 South. Please think of what you
would want built near where you live I don't think it would be this eye sore . We were told that this was going to come
up for decision on May 3rd. 2018 at 9am.
Thank You
Kathy E. Mercier
14468 Grapevine Dr.
Naples Fl. 34114. Reflection Lakes Community Sent from my iPad
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Deb Avery <lowsalt@live.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 8:48 AM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: U.S. 41 storage unit proposal vote NO
Regarding the Proposed Self Storage Warehouse Project
on U.S. 41 across from Naples Reserve Blvd.
Dear Donna Fiala
Dear Andy Solis
Dear Burt Saunders
Dear Penny Taylor
Dear Bill McDaniel
A mini self storage warehousing unit for U.S. 41 is not what our neighborhood of Reflection Lakes wants.
We would like this project rejected, right now. We do not want an "industrial looking" building right across from
our home. We have a low fence. U.S. 41 was built up higher and wider and now much louder, we do not need
to add a storage unit to this also.
Please vote NO on this project. Please!
Homeowner in Reflection Lakes
Deb Avery
14848 Canton Court
Naples FL 34114
701-306-9908
lowsalt@live.com
Thank you for your time.
BrownleeMichael
From: Christina Baron <ccgbaron@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 12:38 PM
To: SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; FialaDonna
Subject: Self Storage Warehouse Project on US 41 across from Naples Reserve Blvd.
Dear Board Members,
It has come to my attention that a mini self storage warehouse is petitioning to be built across from
my community at Reflection Lakes.
I am taking the time to write you this email because since I purchased my brand new home 4 years
ago, the expansion of route 41 has made my home unsellable. So I definitely believe that an unsightly
commercial storage warehouse would not help the situation at all.
I realize that the area is growing rapidly and I guess that's a good thing. But to be fair, maybe this
facility should be built in a space where homes haven't been built yet. And potential buyers can make
the decision if they want to look at that from their lanai before purchasing a new home. But to put
something that unattractive in view of homes that have already been affected by the road expansion,
isn't right.
I don't know if you are the same Board Members that determined not to put anything between my
community and the new roadway. I know that we have had a Route 41 committee trying to work with
the county to possibly get more trees planted on our side to help block out the noise to no avail. But I
see many trees and beautiful landscape being planted on Collier Blvd and Santa Barbara.
I tried to sell my brand new home two years ago and couldn't because of the road noise. I will be
trying again very soon to sell my home but I am concerned that the same reaction is going to prevent
me from actually selling it.
So please take into consideration how these projects affect home values around them.
Sincerely,
Christina Baron
14764 Cranberry Court
Naples, FL 34114
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Paul Kraska <ptkraska@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 1:42 PM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Regarding the Proposed Self Storage Warehouse Project
Regarding the Proposed Self Storage Warehouse Project.
1 do not believe a storage unit is needed at this site.
Also need to consider that Naples Reserve Blvd is the entrance to two communities Reflection lakes with 562 residences
and Naples Reserve approximately 1200 residents and a traffic will be needed at this intersection for pedestrian and
motor vehicle safety reasons
BrownleeMichael
From: gmdfl <gmdfl@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 4:29 PM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Route 41 proposed storage facility.
I live in Reflection Lakes and am against this project.
Unsightly for our community.
Inconsistent with near by housing.
How many of these type of things do we need?
Respectfully,
Gail Dennis
Sent from my Verizon,Samsung Galaxy smartphone
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Laura Kallenberg <bail411k@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 3:58 PM
To: FialaDonna; burt.saunders@colliercounty.com; penny.taylor@colliercounty.gov;
bill.mcdaniel@colliercounty.gov; andy.solis@colliercounty.gov
Subject: Re: Storage unit on route 41
Sent from my iPad
>On Apr 20, 2018, at 3:48 PM, Laura Kallenberg<bail411k@yahoo.com>wrote:
> It is with great dismay that we have learned of the proposed self storage on route 41 across from Naples reserve blvd.
how in the world can this be even considered? I think our area is being over built and for an area that is being ignored
by the county, maybe you will hear our opposition to this. We feel like the Cinderella being ignored by the evil
stepsisters (the county). We are getting dumped on enough, please vote this down and keep what little wooded area we
have left. Enough is enough.Soon we are going to look like a city and that's not why we moved here. Shame on anyone
who votes for this.Thank you
> Laura kallenberg
> 14788 canton ct
> Naples
>Sent from my iPad
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Bill and Jenny Mourning <billjeni@live.com>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 9:52 AM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Regarding the Proposed Self Storage Warehouse Project across from Naples Reserve and
Reflection Lakes
Dear Donna,
As residents in this area we are pleading with you to consider the impact this proposed project would have on
this residential area.
We already have major issues with traffic and speeding. We also have hundreds of new homes under
construction and hundreds
more that land is just being cleared for. We have an elementary school, a middle school and a fire station as
well. This area is not
a good fit for a commercial property. There is much land available just north of here on 41 East and Collier
that is probably already
zoned commercial. We know you will take all of this into consideration when it's decision time. Thank you for
your time and all
you do for our County.
Regards,
Bill and Jenny Mourning
Sent from Outlook
i
BrownleeMichael
From: Kathleen Bouffard <kmbouffard@gmail.corn>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 3:44 AM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Proposed Storage Warehouse on 41
As a full time resident of Reflection Lakes, I am totally against building another storage facility.There are at least 5
existing facilities within a 10 mile radius of our community. We do not need another one in our residential area.
Sincerely,
Kathi Bouffard
Sent from my iPad
1
BrownleeMichael
From: roger hatfield <hatroger@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2018 1:51 PM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: RE: East Naples Storage Unit
Ms. Brownlee:
Thank you for replying to my email regarding the proposed storage unit facility across US 41 from our Reflection Lakes
Community. We could not attend yesterday's meeting regarding this proposal. My wife Mary had an MRI;sometimes
health issues outweigh zoning issues. But please let Ms. Fiala know that we are adamantly against this facility being
built. And I am sure the residents of Naples Reserve do not want this across from the entrance to their community.
Hopefully many people have expressed this and the Commissioners will void/cancel this proposal.
Sincerely,
Roger Hatfield
On Wed, 4/25/18, FialaDonna <Donna.Fiala@colliercountyfl.gov>wrote:
Subject: RE: East Naples Storage Unit
To: "roger hatfield" <hatroger@yahoo.com>
Date: Wednesday,April 25, 2018, 3:33 PM
Thank you for your email to
Commissioner Fiala regarding the proposed Storage Unit Facility near your community. We have learned that the
applicant will be appearing before the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at the next meeting on Thursday
May 3rd where you can express your feelings to the board members. The meeting starts at gam and is held in the
Commission Chambers at the address below. If it is approved by the CCPC, it still would need to go before the Board of
County Commissioners at a future meeting for final approval (these meetings are also open to the public). As you may
be aware, Commissioner Fiala sought a moratorium on additional storage units,gas stations and pawn shops on the
East Trail but she didn't have enough votes from the other Commissioners to pass the moratorium.
Regards,
Michael Brownlee
Executive
Coordinator to Commissioner Donna Fiala, District#1
W. Harmon Turner Building-
Bldg "F"
3299 Tamiami Trail East,
Suite#303
Naples, FL 34112
P: (239) 252-8601
F: (239)
252-6578
NOTE: Our County
Email Addresses have changed.
My new email
1
address is Michael.Brownlee@CollierCountyFL.gov
Subscribe to Commissioner Fiala's
Newsletter here.
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to
a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in
writing.
Original Message
From: roger hatfield [mailto:hatroger@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 2:33 PM
To: FialaDonna <Donna.Fiala@colliercountyfl.gov>
Subject: East Naples Storage Unit
Ms. Fiala:
My residence is 14338 Manchester Dr.
Naples--Reflection Lakes Community. Please know that my wife and I are highly against plans to build a storage unit
right across US 41 from our Reflection Lakes Community. Please re-consider and do NOT allow that facility to be built
right across our community and right across Naples Reserve Community. This area is growing; another residential plan
is being built right across from Manatee School; I'm sure you're aware of this. We do not want or need a storage unit in
our residential area.
Feel free to call me at 239
2314548 or email or US mail me to discuss this matter.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Roger and Mary
Hatfield
Under Florida Law, e-mail
addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,
do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
2
BrownleeMichael
From: Eileen Burns <eburns110@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 5:52 PM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Proposed storage units opposit Reflection Lake entrance
Sent from my iPhone. I realize from having met you that I am preaching to the choir but please note my strong
objection to this purpose for that property.There are many storage units on 41 and Collier Blvd. would love to see more
restaurants (no fast foods please) at that location or possibly an assisted living facility. Please feel free to contact me if
any questions. Eileen Burns
1
BrownleeMichael
From: rick thomas <poolman3002003@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 4:34 PM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Proposed Self storage Warehouse project
Hello my name is Richard Thomas I live at 14579 Manchester dr, Naples in Reflection Lakes and I am writing to all of you
in regards to the proposed mini self storage warehouse across from Naples Reserve Blvd on U.S 41.This is a big mistake
we have to many storage facilities already and they are a big eye sore especially in a residential area.There are many
residents in our community alone that are NOT in favor of this eye sore any where near our community, please be
understanding of our feeling on this matter we DON'T NEED OR WANT this in our neighbor hood there are plenty of
commercial properties that you can put this facility at!! Thank you
Richard Thomas
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
BrownleeMichael
From: carol sheridan <queenmilly@hotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 5:24 PM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Proposed Storage Warehouse
Ms.Fiala,
I am a resident of Reflections Lakes and have heard of a proposal for a storage facility, located very close and
within visual sight of my community. I am against any structure of this type as this would have an adverse
effect on the community, aesthetically as well as economically.
Carol Sheridan
14733 Cranberry Ct
Naples, 34114
Sent from Outlook
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Ann Marie Kraft-Ziske <annmariez@kraftwerks.net>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 9:34 AM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Proposed Storage Facility-Adjacent to Collier County Reflection Lakes
Dear Collier County Commissioner,
As a resident of Reflection Lakes community located on US 41 and Naples Reserve, we are writing to express
our concern and objection to the proposed storage facility to be located adjacent to our home. Reflection Lakes
is a beautiful and tranquil community. Locating industrial type facilities in such proximity will only degrade the
neighborhood and surely decrease property values. Please consider denying this project. Our south Naples area
is blossoming and attracting new residents daily. Again please deny this project, which certainly could be
located in a more commercial/industrial corridor nearby. Thank you.
Bob and Ann Marie Ziske
14678 Fern Lake Court
Naples, FL 34114
Ann Marie Ziske
KRAMWERKS
C=eats space,Maxirmtsng produciivr,y
WBE Certified
716 876 9000 ext 1011
716 876 9398 fax
www.kraftwerks.net
BrownleeMichael
From: Michael Boyer<byrmike@live.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 12:18 PM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Proposed Self Storage Warehouse Project at Naples Reserve Blvd. on U.S.41
The proposed self storage warehouse at Naples Reserve Blvd. and US 41 if built will negatively affect the
property values at Naples Reserve and Reflection Lakes. Also, it will have a negative affect on our security and
public safety in our communities. Not only would such a faculty be unsightly it will draw strangers to the
entrances of our communities. Some of those strangers will not be of good moral, ethical and law abiding
natures. Storage facilities are sometimes used for unlawful purposes and are often the target of break-ins.
This business needs to be located in high traffic business area not in a residential environment.
Your action on this matter will hopefully deserve our appreciation.
1
BrownleeMichael
From: calderm310@aol.com
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 10:41 AM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Proposed Self Storage Warehouse Project
To the County Board
I am writing this email to protest the proposed Storage Warehouse across from Reflection Lakes
Subdivision. We have paid a great deal of money for our homes here in Reflection Lakes and we
believe that the Storage Warehouse you're considering would be detrimental to the value of our
homes. This was zoned as residential property. Please take this into consideration, would you want
this Storage Warehouse across from your home?
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Marie Chiaro
Reflection Lakes Homeowner
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Ronald Reid <ronaldcreid@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 8:26 PM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Cc: Cynthia Reid
Subject: Proposed Mini Self Storage Warehouse Project
Commissioner Fiala,
Thanks for all you have done to improve East Naples!
My wife Cynthia and I have been residents of Reflection Lakes of Naples since 2012. We moved
here because of:
• the great value of Lennar Homes and our home's great location on one of the many lakes in
the community,
• the potential for more beautiful homes being built in Reflection Lakes (completed by Neal
Communities in 2017),
• the potential for more beautiful homes being built around Reflection Lakes (e.g., Naples
Reserve and the homes to come to land cleared by Argo at Manatee and Tamiami Trail)
• the proximity to retail and restaurants at Collier Boulevard and Tamiami Trail
In addition, we are very pleased with:
• the recent expansion of retail and restaurants at Collier Boulevard and Tamiami Trail,
• the expansion of the Eagle Lakes Community Center providing access to great fitness classes
• the expansion of Tamiami Trail from 2 lanes to 6 along our neighborhood to Collier Boulevard
and the plans for street lighting along the expanded roadway,
• the plans for an overpass at Collier and Tamiami Trail
The above improvements help add value to our home. However, the addition of a Mini Self Storage
Warehouse next door to our community DOES NOT add value to our home and potentially will
decrease the value of our home. A decrease in the value of our home is obviously not one of the
reasons we chose to live in Reflection Lakes of Naples.
PLEASE work with your fellow members of the Collier County Board of Commissioners to prevent the
proposed Mini Self Storage Warehouse from being built in this residential neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Ronald and Cynthia Reid
14641 Fern Lake Court
Naples, FL 34114
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Patti <kpastaking@charter.net>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 11:01 AM
To: FialaDonna; TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill
Subject: Proposed mini self storage warehousing
We do Not feel this is appropriate for this residential area!
We are residents of Reflection Lakes and wish for you to vote NO Thank You, Patricia & Kenneth Nuss Sent from my iPad
1
BrownleeMichael
From: patcogswel11@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 3:20 PM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Proposed mini self storage warehouses to be built on U.S.41
Dear Collier County Board Member;
I am writing you with regard to the proposed mini self storage warehouses to be built on U.S.41 across from Naples
Reserve Blvd. As a Real Estate Appraiser I have seen East Naples slowly crawling out from under the stigma that it had
been living under. This has occurred primarily due to the new level of quality construction that has been built in this area
over the last decade. With East Naples being one of the few areas for Naples to expand, this high level of construction
will only continue if we maintain that level of quality throughout. That does not include an "industrial looking"
warehouse project being built in the middle of a residential area. You placed a building moratorium on projects of this
"industrial looking"type just so the quality new construction will continue. A care facility is a residential community
project which fits the area; NOT an "industrial looking"warehouse project.
Thank you for your consideration,
Pat Cogswell
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Darrel Sparzo <dsparzo@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 4:26 PM
To: FialaDonna
Cc: sparzo D; Peggy M. A. Driscol; Rohm Roz
Subject: Please vote against proposed storage facility on 41 near Reflection Lakes & Naples Reserve
Dear Donna Fiala,
My fiance and I spent our life savings to move into a quiet residential area in South Florida. We are
very unhappy to learn about the proposed industrial-looking storage facility near our new home within
view of our community at Reflection Lakes.
Thank you so much in advance for your consideration!
Sincerely,
Darrel Sparzo & Peggy Driscol
14685 Sonoma Blvd
Naples, FL 34114
317-250-0503
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Kenneth Durning <kdurn@msn.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 3:14 PM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Mini storage warehouse proposal
Ms Fiala,
I am writing this email to let you know I disapprove of the proposed mini storage warehouse to be located on US 41
across from Naples Reserve Blvd. This industrial type project is wrong for the residential area. I am a homeowner in the
Reflection Lakes community. There are several storage warehouses on US 41 already and I believe this type of building
detracts from the beauty and residential feel of the area.
Please do not approve this type of building in our residential neighborhood.
Thank you,
Suzanne Durning
Naples, Florida
Sent from my iPhone
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Susan Nash <bodiam@outlook.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 11:41 AM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Objection to Self Storage Facility on US41
Dear Board Member,
I respectfully submit my strong opposition to the above referenced project as a resident of Reflection Lakes Naples.
Susan C. Nash
14310 Manchester Dr
Naples FL 34114
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Janet OConnell <janetoc8@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 8:54 PM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: No warehouse near Reflection Lakes entrance!
Hello Commissioner Fiala...l'm glad you are still representing us. I live in the community of Reflection Lakes where you
have come to visit us a few times presenting excellent town hall meetings! You are so very welcome here. It has recently
come to our attention that a storage facility is going to be built near us on 41. This would be a disaster to our residential
area (fancy Naples Reserve behind us with their wealthy residents will go ballistic!). Most of us in Reflection Lakes are
middle class retirees who value our quiet surroundings and don't want to see it go down the drain. Stores are one thing
we have to deal with but NOT a storage facility which will only further destroy our peace and quiet but also even worse
bring more crime. Please don't allow this awful storage building to come here. Please also share my email with your
comissioner colleagues. I watched the east coast of Florida ( I taught in Broward County for 30 years)get destroyed. I
came over here in 2004 to escape. Now I'm seeing the same out of control development happening here. I came to
Naples many years ago when it was truly a paradise...a quaint little fishing village! Please try to preserve what few nice
areas still remain. Out here 2 miles east of the Collier/951 corner, we don't need awful buildings like storage facilities. I
hope and pray that you can prevent this from happening. Thank you for your continual hard work.
Most sincerely and respectfully,
Janet M. O'Connell
Reflection Lakes
14160 Winchester Ct.#1801
Naples, FL 34114
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
1
BrownleeMichael
From: doug locascio <Doug@Idpurchasing.corn>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 11:15 AM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: MINI STORAGE
No mini storage across from Naples Reserve Blvd. on U.S.41 PLEASE!
Doug Locascio
L& D Purchasing
Cell: (914) 774-2865
Office: (239) 228-5585
1
BrownleeMichael
From: florida0323@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 7:04 AM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Mini storage unit
I do not want a mini storage unit built near my home. Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Gayle Grucci <gaylegrucci@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 4:09 PM
To: FialaDonna
Cc: SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Mini storage on US41
Dear Collier County board members,
We live in the Reflection Lakes community. We heard about the possibility of a storage warehouse being built on 41
across from the Naples Reserve Blvd. We are adamantly opposed to having this warehouse in our residential area. It will
bring down our property values. Who will want to live in an area where there is industrial building? WE DON'T!!!!
We want this to stay a residential area.We spent a great deal of money to build this home and would appreciate the
board members taking this into consideration. We live here full time and we do vote. Please respect us and do not
approve this application.
Respectfully,
Charles and Gayle Grucci
14756 Cranberry Court, Naples
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Linda Locascio <lindalocascio@Idpurchasing.com>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 10:17 AM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Mini Storage on 41
All—
I live in Reflection Lakes and we do not want a mini storage across from Naples Reserve Blvd and 41.
Thank you!
Linda Locascio
Principal / President
11 L6 D PURCHASING
Certified, .Jit -Or e si nesa
Cell#: 914-588-2339
LindaLocascio(a)LDPurchasing.com
Certified
wiri
E
umm,!..8",,,,,v„Eta ,im1
BrownleeMichael
From: Kathy Limyansky <kathyL@bhhsfloridarealty.net>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 12:35 PM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Mini Storage
It was wonderful to hear you speak at the Marco office for Lunch and Learn and I also hope you had a fantastic
birthday!! I know from hearing you speak that you will not be supporting the new mini storage across from Reflection
Lake, but as a resident on that 951/41 corner I do believe we have hit our limit on storage facilities 'Li❑❑ Looking
forward to your next talk!! Kathy with BHHS Florida Realty...
Sent from my iPhone
BrownleeMichael
From: Dale Nash <kilo34@outlook.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 8:53 AM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Mini self storage
Ms. Fiala,
As a resident of Reflection Lakes, I wish to express my opposition to the proposal to build a self mini storage complex on
Rt. 41 across the street from Naples Reserve Blvd.
Thank you,
Dale Nash
14310 Manchester Dr.
Naples, FL 34114
Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Fernando Resendes <fernandoresendes@cs.com>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 8:23 PM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: mini self storage warehousing
Greetings,
My name is Fernando Resendes resident of 14361 Manchester Drive in Reflection Lakes Naples. I am
sending this email to you because I am not in favor of this proposal of the "mini self storage warehousing"
Respectfully,
Fernando Resendes
(239) 682-4771
fernandoresendes@cs.com
BrownleeMichael
From: Dianne Yutko <dianneyutko@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2018 3:27 PM
To: SolisAndy; FialaDonna; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; TaylorPenny
Subject: Mini Self Storage Warehouse
We live in Reflection Lakes and have been informed that a mini self storage warehouse is possibly going to be built in our
area. As we pass these facilities going into Naples and surrounding areas we fail to see why a residential area with many
homes and more being built this year would wish to have a commercial/industrial complex built in the middle of so many
residences. There is nothing pretty about boxes, streets getting to boxes, and metal gates to keep thief minded people out
of getting into boxes. So far, this area of town is lovely looking and we would like to see it not becoming tacky.
With 50,000 storage units already across the country storing a variety of junk, it seems the great need'? for this type of
building could be accommodated in an area where there currently is commercial/industrial which will not ruin the scenery
for home owners who have paid a lot of money to not look at warehouses.
Please consider this a request to Not Allow building a mini self storage warehouse.
Dianne and Phillip Yutko, 14663 Fern Lake Court, Naples FL
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Rosemarie Jones <rosemarie12999@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 4:33 PM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Mini self storage unit
I would like to have recorded my disapproval with the proposed mini self storage warehouse that is possible being built
on US41 directly across from Naples Reserve Blvd. I reside in Reflection Lakes and would not approve of this industrial
building being built directly across from our community. Vote no on this agenda.
Thank you
Rosemarie Jones
Reflection Lakes resident
Sent from my iPhone
1
BrownleeMichael
From: roger hatfield <hatroger@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 2:33 PM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: East Naples Storage Unit
Ms. Fiala:
My residence is 14338 Manchester Dr. Naples--Reflection Lakes Community. Please know that my wife and I are highly
against plans to build a storage unit right across US 41 from our Reflection Lakes Community. Please re-consider and do
NOT allow that facility to be built right across our community and right across Naples Reserve Community. This area is
growing; another residential plan is being built right across from Manatee School; I'm sure you're aware of this. We do
not want or need a storage unit in our residential area.
Feel free to call me at 239 2314548 or email or US mail me to discuss this matter.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Roger and Mary Hatfield
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Pilgrim, Jeff<jeff.pilgrim@rbc.com>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 2:31 PM
To: FialaDonna; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill
Subject: Concerns about Potential Self Storage Construction
Ms. Fiala, Mr. Solis, Mr. Saunders, Ms.Taylor and Mr. McDaniel;
Thank you for the opportunity to express my concern on the planning of a potential self-storage facility in the area of
Naples Reserve Blvd. on U.S.41. As a home owner in the area, I am concerned for several reasons about this
potential development. First there is actually an amazingly vibrant wildlife thriving in that area, I have on many
occasions seen deer, otters, various reptile, birds and insects, I walk there regularly and often watch for the
wildlife. Disturbing this habitat for something as meaningless as a self-storage is not a worthy trade off. I know
this is a personal opinion, but I just don't think it's a usefulness use of the space to disturb it. I also don't think
the voting public would be advocating for this. If it were homes, or a park, or a school, even a place of worship
I wouldn't be as against it, these are necessities in our society. Storage lockers are not necessities, the people
who need these things should just have less stuff, or have the mobile storage lockers on their driveways or use
their garages, there are alternatives.
Secondly, if the corporate investors that are looking to lobby in some way for this to occur I assure you the
citizens of the area on mass would not want this, a small number perhaps, but if you think about it this is not a
winning endeavour, they may argue it creates jobs, outside of the construction jobs that are temporary, I would
bolded disagree on the job creation, perhaps 1 or 2 jobs for thousands of square feet, the trade-off is an
absolute loser.
Please don't allow this to happen, respectfully yours,
Jeff Pilgrim
A concerned neighbor
If you received this email in error,please advise the sender(by return email or otherwise)immediately.You have consented to receive the
attached electronically at the above-noted email address;please retain a copy of this confirmation for future reference.
Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur,veuillez en aviser I'expediteur immediatement,par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen.Vous avez
accepte de recevoir le(s)document(s)ci-joint(s)par vole electronique a I'adresse courriel indiquee ci-dessus;veuillez conserver une copie de cette
confirmation pour les fins de reference future.
1
BrownleeMichael
From: Dawn Chard <charddawnc@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 10:44 AM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Collier County Planning Committee Meeting May 3
Dear Ms. Fiala,
I am writing to share my concerns in regards to the proposed mini self-storage warehousing which will be
located across from Naples Reserve Blvd. on U.S.41 within view of our Reflection Lakes community.
It is no secret that East Naples is one of the most expanding regions in Collier County. The area has already
seen tremendous growth in new communities and restaurants. Real estate experts indicate that this area
remains a highly sought-after residential address. To that end, I speak for not only my family but also for my
neighbors and do not wish to see our residentia/neighborhood transformed into the sort of area currently
seen elsewhere in Collier County.
We moved to this part of the County for a reason....we enjoy the quiet, relaxing residential atmosphere. Our
proximity to Collier Seminole State Park and to the "outskirts" of the Everglades and also to Fakahatchee
Strand State Preserve, bring a residential rural environment worthy of preserving.
Ms. Fiala, I kindly ask that you please reconsider this proposal.
Thank you,
Dawn and Kevin Chard
14546 Lanier Court
Naples, FL 34114
1
BrownleeMichael
From: jennifer<jennadamson@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 11:07 AM
To: FialaDonna
Subject: Against mini storage warehouse on 41 hwy and naples reserve bld.
Donna Fiala,
We are writing about our concern over the plans to construct a mini self storage warehouse at us 41 and Naples Reserve
Blvd. We live at 14195 fall Creek Court in Reflection Lakes and fell this industrial like project will detract from the Florida
style of life we so much enjoy and will bring down our property value.You would not want this type of project in your
backyard.These types of projects should not be close to large residential areas such as Reflections lakes or Naples
Reserve. Please reconsider your plans and move this project elsewhere.
Roger and Jennifer Adamson
14195 Fall Creek Ct.
Naples, Fl.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10