The URL can be used to link to this page

BCC Minutes 03/02/1982 R -.--.....---..---1' I . Naples, Florida, March 2, 1982 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for thè County of Collier, and also acting as the Governing Board(s) of such special diøtricts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. In Regular Session In Building -F- of the Courthouse Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: VICE-CHAIRMAN: Mary-Frances Kruse John A. plstor Clifford C. Wonzel ABSENT: C. R. -Russ- Wimer, Chairman David, C. Brown ALSO PRESENT: William J. Reagan, Clerk (9:30 A.M.); Harold L. Hall, ':hief Deputy Clerk/Fiscal Oh, '.er; Darlene Davidson and Maureen Kenyon (1:30 P.M.), Deputy Clerks; Donald Pickworth. County Attorney; C. William Norman, County Manager; Edward Smith, Administrative Services Administrator; Neil Dorrill, Public Safety Administrator; Terry virta, Community Development ~dministrator; Lee Kirchhoff and Terry Clark, Planners; Jeffory Perry, Zoning Director; Clifford Barksdale, Public Works Administrator; Donald Norton, Public Services Administrator; Nancy Israelson, Administrative Secretary tn the Board; and, Deputy Chief Raymond Barnett, Sheriff's Department. rage 1 ~OOK 0 Ô 7 FACt 630 - BOOK 067 PACt 631 -. March 2, 1982 NOTE: : . . Chairman Wimer and Commissioner 8$ indicated by 3/0 voto. * . o Brown were absent this date, Q AGENDA APPROVED WITH DELETION AND ADDITION Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner plstor ~nd carried 3/0, that the Agenda be approved with the followin9 addition and deletion. .1. (Item 9"3) Consideration of approval of a policy establbhin9 requirements in cases of continued public hea~ings - continued for one week. 2. R~quest by Tax Collector Guy Carlton to consider approval of rental of The Depot to conduct tax certificate sales - added to BCC (Item 13A) MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 16, 1982 - APPROVED AS PRESENTED Commissioner Pistor moved, ~econded by Commissioner Wenzel an~ carried 3/0, that the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 16, 1982, þe approved as presented. PETITION CP-8l-31C, MARCO ISLAND ENGINEERING RF.PRESENTING M^RCO WO~DS, INC.,. - CONTINUED TO 4/6/82. Conmissioner pistor moved, seconded by Commi~sio~er Wenzel and carried 3/0, that petition CP-8l-31C, Marco Islanrl Engineering, representing Marco Woods, Inc., requesting a land use amendment fro~ an area of environmental sensitivity to agricultural, for 80 acres in the N 1/2, SE l/4, Section 29, 51S, R27E, north of S.R. 92, appr~ximat.ly 2 miles west of Royal Palm Hammock Road, be continued to 4/6/82, at the request of the petitioner. There was a brief discussion on the number of times thia Pa98 2 .... . ... ... . .' - -- ~ ~. . . [- March 2, 1982 particular petItion has been continued, at the conclusion of which it was the consensus of those members present that, since the petitioner is requesting this petition be continued for over three weeks, the Community Development Administrator should advIse tho petitioner that it will be readvertised at the petitioner's expense. PETITION TR-82-4C, LANDER JAY FLOYD, REQUE~rING A TEMPORARY RESIDENCE PERMIT (W. 180 FT. OF TR^CT 9S, UNIT 7, GOLDEN G^TE ESTATES) ^PPROVED Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner pistor and carried 3/0, that petition TR-82-4C, filed by Lander Jay Floyd, requesting a temporary residence permit to utilize a travel trailer while constructing a permanent residence on the west 180 ft. of Tract 95, Unit 7, Golden Gate Estates, be approved as recommended by Zoning Director Jeffory Perry. PETITION TR-82-5C, D. K. ANDERSON, REQUESTING A TEMPORARY RESIDENCE PERMIT (29TH. AVENUE S.W., GOLDEN GATE ESTATES) - APPROVED Referring to the information outlined within the Executive Summary, dated 2/12/82, regarding petition TR-82-5C, ffled by D. K. Anderson, requesting a temporary residence permit for utilization of motor home while constructing a permanent residence on a 5 acre tract, located on 29th Avenue S.W., which is 1/4 mile east of S.R. 951, Community Development Administrator Terry Virta reported that staff does not feel the location is sufficiently secluded to warrant a recommend~tion for approval. In reponse to Commissioner Wenzel, Deputy Chief Raymond Barnett stated that, because of the easy access to a highway, he considers the r .- .. Page 3 .... BO~ 067 PACt 632 ~OOK 067 PACt 633 March 2, 1982 probability of vandalism and theft of materials from the subject property to be more likely than if the location were more SGcluded. Ja added that it is his opinion that the petitioner should be granted the opportunity for equal protection.of his property as those who have been granted similar permits and live in more remote areas of the Estates Dlstr ict. Mrs. Laura G. Anderson explained that her mother, who is 94 and in fra 11 health, requires continual care and, if they were to park their motor home in a pa r k , they could not wa tch over their building ma ter ials and her mother at the same time. Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried 3/0, that Petition TR-82-5C, filed by D. K. Anderson, requesting a temporary reside~ce permit to utilize a motor home during construction of a permanent residence on 29th Avenue S.W., Golden Gate Estates, be approved. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF POLICY ESTABLISHING READVERTISING REOUIRE~ENTS IN CASES OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS DEFERRED TO 3/9/8~ Commissioner pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and· car~ied 3/0, that the consideration of approval of a policy establishing readvertislng requirements in cases of continued public hearings be deferred to 3/9/82. INITIAL STARTING PAY LEVEL (PAY GRADE 21) FOR THE HOUSING PROGRAMS SUPERVISOR WAIVED AND AUTHORIZATION GRANTED TO OFFER STARTING PAY RAT! OF UP TO 15\ BEYOND ENTRY LEVEL Community Development Administrator Terry Virta referred to the Page 4 March 2, 1982 information outlined within the Executive Summary, dated 2/24/82, and requested a one-time waiver of the initial starting pay level for the Housing Programs Supervisor. He explained that he has experienced some diffIculty in fillin9 the subject position and he requested authorization to hire someone at up to 15\ beyond entry level, adding that the required funds, which are entIrely Federal Glant funds, have been budg~ted for the position. In answer to Commissioncr pistor, Mr. virta replied that there will be no need for a budget amendment. Commissioner pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and carrIed 3/0, that Mr. virta's request be approved and that he be authorized to hire someone for the position of Housing Programs Supervisor at a pay rate of up to 15\ above entry level for a pay grade 21. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PERMIT FEES FOR THE PRUNING OR REMOVAL OF PROTECTED TREES CONTINUED TO 3/9/82 Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and carried 3/0, that the consideration of adoption of a resolution ePtablishing permit fees for the pruning or removal of protected trees be continued to 3/9/82. TRUST DEED TO LELY HIBISCUS GOLF COURSE ACCEPTED AS CONSTRUCTION SECURITY AND CHAIRMAN AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE FINAL PLAT OF THE LELY COUNTRY ~LUB, TI~ßERCREEK PHASE ONE SUBDIVISION Public Works Administrator Clifford Barksdale recommended that the County accept the Trust Deed to Lely Hibiscus Golf Course as construction security and that the Chairman be authorized to execute pag e 5 aoQ~ 067 FAGe 634 MOK 067 P~Ct 635 March 2, 1982 the final plat of the Lely Country Club, Ti~bercreek Phase Ono Subdivision. Commissioner Wenzel so moved. Commissioner pistc7 seconded the motion which carried 3/0. Pa98 6 .. ...... ... . ~ODK 067. PACt 637 March 2, 1982 EXCAVATION PERMIT :~O. 59.124, WILLIAM B. STONE, PRESIDENT, QUAILS ROOST, INC., SECTIC~ II, T5IS, R26E - APPROVE~ Public WorKS Administrator Clifford Barksdale reported that the request for Excavation Permit No. 59.124 filed by William B. Stone, President, Quails Roost, Inc., for the construction of a retention lake for ð proposed mobile home subdivision, located in Soction 11, TS1S, R26E, approximately 3/4 mile east of S.R. 951, was considered previously by the BCC on 7/l4/81, resulting in a deadlock vote of 2/2. He said that the request was continued until a full Board was present due to a change from mobile home to group housing. He reported that the development plans have been approved and the petitioner is now requesting the approval of the excavation permit fc·r the subject property for which a land tse change to mobile home group housin9 has been approved. In answer to Commissioner Wenzel, Mr Barksdale replied that there will be no removal of any fill m~ter1al from t~e site. Commissioner Wenzel requested that the record so reflect. Mr. Barksdale stated th~t it is the recommendation of staff and the WMAB that the excavation permit be approved, subject to the following stipulations: l. No ?umping as part of the excavation operation. 2. Prior to using the lake as a retention area for future development, petitioner shall submit a detailed drainage plan to the County Engineer for review and approval. 3. The depth of the excavation shall be limited to -9.0 msl. 4. If the main part of the development does not take place, the lake shall be bermed. 5. All applicable provisions of Ordinance No. 80-26 shall be adhered to. Page 7 March 2, 1982 Commissioner Wenzel moved, øeconded by Commissioner pistor and carried 3/0 that Excavation Permit No. 59.124, as described above, be approved, subject to the above-referenced stipu1ati~ns. Mr. Mike 7.p.walk, resident of North Naples, asked if the lake would be 25 ft. deep as was requested ðnd Mr. Barksdale explained that the stipulations limit the depth to -9.0 msl which equates to an approximated depth of +14 ft. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ~HE COLLIER COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES TO OCCUpy AND USE THE FORMER MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTION STATION AT THE IMMOKALEE AIRPORT - CONTINUED TO 3/9/82 Vice-Chairman Kruse stated that the Public Safety Director has requested that cons:deration of the adoption of a resolution authorizing the Collier County Em~rgency Medical Services to occupy and use the former motor "ehicle inspection station at the Immokalee Airport be continued until 3/9/82. Commissioner Wenzel so moved. Commissioner pistor seconded the m~tion which carried 3/0. Pag e 8 ~OOK G 6 7 PACt:: 638 - ~OOK 067 }ACi 629 Much 2, 1982 RECOKMENDATION TO AWARD BID ,551 FOR EAST GOLDEN GATE ESTATES WEIR MODrFICATT0N - OF.NTF.D Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on January 28, and February 2, 1982, as eviden~eð ~? Affidavit of publication filed with the Clerk, bids were received for Bid '551, for modifications to the East Golden Gate Estates W~ir, until 2:30 P.M., on February 24, 1982. ~dministrative Services AdminIstrator Edward Smith recapped the background information outlined within the Executive Summary relating to Bid '551, including a recommendation that the Board award the bid to Zep Construction, Inc., the lowest bidder, and that the Board approve a budget amendment in the amount of $34,000 to transfer funds from those allocated for the T.ely Water Control Structure to this project. Commissione. Pistor so moved. The motion died for lack of a . second. Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Vice-Chairman Kruse and carried 2/1, with Commissioner pistor opposed, that Mr. Smith's recommendation to award Bid '551 b~ denied. BID '543, BAILEY LANE IMPROVEMENTS - AWARDED TO BRISSON ENTERPRISES, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF 593,376.10 Legal notIce havIng been published in the Naples Daily News on January 19 and 21, 1982, as evidenced by Affidavit of publication filed with the Clerk, bids were receIved for Bid 1543 (erroneously advertised as Bid 1493), for Bailey L~ne improvements, until 2:30 P.M., February 17, 1982. Commissioner pistor moved, seconded by Commißsioner Wenzel and carried 3/0, that BId .543 for Bailey Lane improvements be awarded to Page 9 March 2, 1982 Brisson Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $93,376.10, as r~commended by the County EngineerIng Department to be the lowest responsible bid In the best interest of the County, and that the ~h~irman be authorized to a1gn and the Clerk to attest the resulting agreement. CETA CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS AUTHORIZED FOR CHAIRMAN'S EXECUTION . Public Services AdmInistrator Donald Norton referred to the detailed information outlined within the Executive Summary, dated 2/19/82, regarding the CETA programs for which contract modifications are necessary in order to maintain the programs within the reduced levels of funding experienced thus far this year, with the exception o~ th~ Title VII, Private Sector Initiative Program. He explained that t~~ additional $39,444 allotted for the Title VII program will enable about 8 30% ey.pansion of that program for the remainder of this year. Mr. Norton requested authorization for the Chairman's execution of the contract modifications for the following CETA program's contract modifications: Title II-B Ti tIe VII Ti tle IV-YE"'P Ti tle IV·-SYEP Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner pistor and carried 3/0, that the respective contract modifications for the above-referenced CETA programs be approved for the Chairman's signat'1re. Page 10 MOl< 067 PACt 640 - BOOK Go7 PACt 853 March 2, 1982 BOARD POLICY RE CONDUCTING OUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS - APPROV~ County M.Jnager :Jorman stated ;.hat he h..õ developed a basic policy which relates to the procedures to be followed regarding the Board of County CommIssioners when acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and/or conducting related quasi-judicial hearings on the following matters: 1. Board of Zoning Appeals hearing on Zonin~ Ordinance MhardshipM variances. 2. Board of Zoning Appeals hearing on provisional Uses as provided in the Zoning OrdInance. 3. Board of Zoning Appeals hearing of appeals from administra- tive determinations. 4. Petitions for variances to the Coastal ConstructIon Control LIne OrdInance. 5. Request for variances to the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance requirement. Mr. Norman stated that all of the above-referenceJ hearings would be scheduled for the second Tuesday of each month during the Regular BCC meetings. He further stated that he is recommendIng that the Agend~ title þe changed to read -Hearings on Variances and Provision~l Uses· rather than the current title of "Advertised Publi~ Hearings- b~~ause all of these matters involve advertised publ ic hearings, wIth the exception of provisional uses. He added that prc~i5ional use hearings would be scheduled last in order that they do not interfere with the 9:00 A.M. tIme which is advertised for public hearings on the date of the meeting_ Commissioner Wenzel moved and Commissioner pistor seconded the motion to approve the policy outlIned by Mr. Norman and instructed him to implement Sdme as soon as possible. Planner Lee Kirchhoff stated that there are some provisional use Page 11 --,-.-...,.,.", March 2, 1982 petitions that have companion zoning petitions and asked If, under this new policy, they could continue to be heard at the same tIme, as has been done in the past. She said that to separ~te th~ two could add as much as five weeks' time before a petitioner would be able to begin a project. Mr. Norman stated that, in a case such as this, the zoning hearing could be added to the same agenda, or, the provisional use could be heard on the same day as advertised for the zoning hearing. It was the consensus of the Board that thIs exception could be made to the policy and that, when the two were to be presented as companion petitions, they could be heard on the date of the advertised public hearing for the zoning petition. Also, that the final details for scheduling hearings for such companion petitions could be determined by the staff at a later dat~. Mrs. Chðrlotte Westman, representing the Leaaue of Women Voters of Collier County, stated that her organization was pleased with the intentions of the Board to separate the quasi-judicial hearings from the legislative matters under their purvIew and asked if a r~quirement for sworn testimony was being considered for such hearings. She also asked what kind of recordings and minutes would be taken of quasi-judicial hearings? County Attorney Pickworth stated that the County is not prepared to answer these questions at this time, however staff would be consulted regarding the practicality of such measures. Mrs. Westman stated that her intent was to have these matters on record as being considered as a part of the quasi-judicial procedures. Chief Deputy Clerk/Fiscal Officer Harold Hall indicated that the Clerk's office has no problem with the proposed policy, with the exception of the need to sufficiently move back the cut-off date for 800K 067 PACt' 654 Page 12 - -""".-""'-".-.- ~OOK 067 PACt 855 March 2, 1982 submission of mðterial to the Clerk's office in order to insure that legal ~dvcrtlcing roquirements can ~e met. ~ftar ð brief discussion, it was the consensus of the Board that a determination of a cut-off date for information for advertised public hearings is ba~ically a concern that staff could hðndle without being specificðlly ~ddressed in the subject policy. Upon call for the question, the motion carried 3/0. ANNUAL REPORT ON ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS UNDER THE COUNTY MANAGER (FY-1980-198l) SUBMITTED TO BOARD - NO ACTION TAKEN County Manager Norman referred to the Annual Report on Activities and Programs under his responsibility for Fiscal Year 1980-l98l which he submitted to each member of the Board and explaIned that, while it is considered as the County Manager's Report, the bulk of th~ information was prepared by the various Division and Department heads under his purview ðnd requIred very few changes when being compiled. He referred to the Report as a comprehensive overview of the activities within Collier County for which he is responsible, addin~ that he t:usts it will be useful. Vice-Chairman Kruse thanked Mr. Norman for the F·~port and Commissioner Pistor remarked that he considers it to be very complete and well prepared. There was no actIon taken at thls tIme. CHAIRMAN AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT BETWEEN IMMOKALEE WATER/SEWER DISTRICT AND COUNTY RE DELEGATION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES County Manager Normðn explained that he received an appeal from residents ðS well as the Water/Sewer DIstrict Board of Trustees expressing concern over the inspection fees for connectIons to the new Page 13 --;,,<..,,~" March 2, 1982 øanltary sewer system and suggesting that it is excessive. He added that, bas~d on the amount of personnel, work, and record keeping that was necessa/:y, he dld not feel that the $27 inspection fee was unfair or warranted a te=ommendatlon that the Board of County Commissioners should change. He said that the Trustees felt that this fee would impede compliance to connections into the sewer system. Mr. Norman recommended that the Board authorize the Chairman's execution of an interlocal Agreement with the Immokalee Water/Sewer District which delegates the responsibility to the District for this one phase of the plumbing inspection program, at no charge to the customers. He said that the District will provide the Building Code Compliance Department with docum~ntation of approved work and assured code compliance. Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner .Pistor and carried 3/0, that the aforementioned inter local agreement with the Immokalee Water/Sewer District be approved for the Chairman's execution. ~OO\( Gß1 r~~l656 Page 14 -_-.".~.._,_.;--_..,-_..."._.", March 2, 1982 RESOLUTION RE ROTATIONAL POLICY FOR SELECTION OF NEWSPAPERS FOR ADVERTISING THE DELINQUENT TAX LIST - CONTINUED County Attorney pickworth referred to th~ drafted resolution submitted as part of the Executiv~ Summary and explained that, pursuant to the Board's expressed wishes, he has prepared this resolution which outlines the rotational policy for selection of newspapers for advertising the Delinquent Tax List. Referring to paragraph two, Mr. pickworth explained that the rotational system will be initiated next year with the selection of the .weekly. newspapers because the Naples Daily News was given the assignment two consecutive y~ar£, as was discussed last year by the Boa rd. CommIssioner Wenzel asked if the Board voted to go on a rotational system, when the selection came before the Board two weeks ago? Vice-Chairman Kruse replied affirmatively. Commis~'oner pistor stated that he thought that it was decided to not vote on adopting a required rotational system. Commissioner Wønzel added that he would prefer to see the matter handled each year on a ·bid~ basis. CommissiOher pistor concurred. County Attorney pickworth stated that he does not know if the Board voted on the matter or if he was just directed to draft a resolution for consideration. Commissioner Pistor moved that, rather than adopting a rotational basis policy, the Board adopt a policy for letting the advertising of the delinquent tax list out for bids each year. The motion died for lack of a second. County Attorney pIckworth suggested that it might be better to ~ake a decision when a full Board is present, particularly since it was Page lS &OOK 067 PACt 660 - I' -_..-,. March 2, 1982 &O!)K 067 PACt fi6f before a full Board that the rotational policy was considered in the first place. Vice-Chairman Kruse suggested ~hat this matter be continued. Commissioner Wenzel so moved and Commissioner Plstor seconded the motion. Mr. pIckworth pointed out that, whichever method the Boarrl chooses and subsequently adopts a resolution regarding, the Board would not be bound by that method. He said that the State Statutes require that the Board make a selection every year to publish the delinquent tax list and the Board must, in fact, make that selection. He said that it is possible to adopt the subject resolution for a rotational policy and, if it is the pleasure of the Board, next year they could put it out ~or bids. He said that there is no way that the Board could bind themselves, or future Commissioners that may sit on the Board, to the rotational system. ComrniGsioner pistor asked Mr. Pickworth, if the overall Doard doe~ decide, by majority vote, that they prefer a rotationai policy, would it be possible to rotate on a tri-yearly basis, i.e. one year the Naples Daily; the next year the Eagle; and, the t~ird year the Star? Mr. pickworth replied affirmatively, adding that the only reason that the resolution addresses the weeklies collectively is because he understood that there was some concern that the desired coverage might not be accomplished by publication in one weekly and that the Board preferred to treat them collectively. Mr. Pickworth concluded by stating that there is no require~ent that the weeklies be treated collectively. Managing Editor William Gentry of the Marco Island Eagle, stated Page 16 March 2, 1982 that hIs newspaper would be pleased if the advertising for the delinquent tax list were to be put out for bids. He also stated that, if the Board chooses to initiate a rotational system policy, his newspaper prefers to see the tri-yearly rotational proposal be adopted, whereby the weeklies are treated separately, as suggested earlier by Commissioner pistor. He concluded by stating that he feels the Eagle i8 just as good of a publication as the other two publicatIons and that thIs kInd of a rotationr' system in the future would be in the best interest of the County and of the publications. upon call for the question, the motion to continue the matter until there is a Lull Board carried 3/0. COUNTY ATTORNEY PICKWORTH READ HIS LETTER OF RESIGNATION, EFFECTIVE MAY 28, 1982 County ~ttorney pickworth read his letter of resignation, effective May 28, 1982, into the record, noting that he has provided a copy to each of the Commissioners. Vice-Chairman Kruse thanked Mr. Pickworth and stated that it is wilh regret that she has learned of his resignation. ROUTINE BILLS - PAID Pursuant to Resolution 81-150, the following checks were issued through Friday, t'ebruary 26,1982, ill payment of routine bills: FUND CHECK NOS. AMOUNT County Checks BCC payroll Immokalee MVI 4254 - 4488 31633 - 34169 1 $l65,144.42 290,862.96 30,000.00 Page 17 ~OOK 067 PACt 662 - &O~~ 067 PAtt 663 ~ March 2, 198:2 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 82-56 (TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN~) PROVIDING FOR DIFFERENCE IN FUNDS ORIGINALLY BUDGETED AND COST OF VEHICLE FOR SECONDARY ROAD PROG~^M RE BID NO. 533 - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $850 Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner rJstor and carried 3/0, that Budget Amendment No. 82-56, provIding for the difference in funds originally budgeted and the cost of a vehicle for the Secondary Road Program related to Bid 533 (Road Construction 5 , 6 Gas Tax Fund/Transportation Department), be adopted in the amount of $850. Page 18 --, _~~ø March 2, 19B2 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 82-57 (TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT) FOR MECHANICAL HARVESTER _ ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF S~5,000 Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner plator ðnd carried 3/0, that Budget Amendment No. 82-57, for a mechanical harvester (Water Management fund/Transportation Department), be adopted in the amount of $65,000. Page 19 BOOK 067 PACt:' 667 March 2, 1982 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 82-58 (CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST 1977 FUND) ADOPTED TN THE AMOUNT OF $2,705,07~ Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner pistor and carried 3/0, that Budget Amendment No. 82-58, updating the capital project fund to maintain updated capital expenditure programs (Capital Improvement Trust 1977 Fund), be adopted in the amount of $2,705,076. Page 20 .. ..'~,,,._'",~..... BOOK 067 PACt 671' March 2, 1982 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 82-59 (UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AREA CIP FUND) - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $318,893 Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner plstor and carried 3/0, that Dudgct Amendment No. 82-59, updating capital project fund to maintain updated capital expenditure progrðmS (Unincorporated County Area CIP Fund), be adopted in the amount of $318,893. Page 21 March 2, 1982 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 82-60 (CIP OTHER THAN ROADS FUND) - ADOP1'ED IN THE AMOUNT OF $4l5,l79 Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner pistor and carried 3/0, that Budget Amendment No. 82-60, updat1n~ capital project fund to maintain updated capital expenditure programs (CIP Other Than Roads Fund), be adopted in the amount of $4lS,l79. ~oo~ Oß7 PAGt 674 Page 22 ~OOK 067 PACt 677 - March 2, 1982 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 82-61 (GENERAL FUND/OTHER GENERAL ^~~INI~TRATION) _ ADOPTED IN THE AM~UNT OF SI,179,R64 Commissioner Wenzol moved, seconded by CommIssioner pistor ðnd carried 3/0, that Budget Amendment No. 82-5l, tra~sferring revenues to adjust budget in accordance with Board approvals on 9/29/81 re General Fund/Other General Administration, be adopted in the amount of $l,l79,864. ---- Page 23 . ";', &O~ 057 fACi679 March 2, 1982 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 82-62 (PURCHASING DEPARTMENT) INCRE~SED COST OF CONFER~NCE TARLE - ^DOPT~n TN THE AMOUNT OF SIC . Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner pistor and carried 3/0, that Budget Amendment No. 82-62, prvviding for increased cost of conference table for the purchasing Department, be adopted 1n the amount of $lO. page 24 March 2, 1982 ~OD( G ß 7 PACt 681 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 82-~3 (COLLIER COUNTY EMS) APPROPRIATING CASH CARRYOVER ~ND BUDGET EXPENDITURES FOR PURCHASE OF 2 AMBULANCE VEHICLES _ ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $6(,,000 Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner pistor and cðrried 3/0, that Budget Amendment No. 82-63, appropriating cash carryover and budget expenditures to provide for purchas~ of two ambulance vehicles for the Collier County EMS, be adopted in the amount of 566,000. Page 25 &OOK 057 PACt 683 March 2, 1982 BUDCET AMENDMENT NO. 82-64 (TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT) FOR PURCHASE or PUMP SYSTEM AND FABRICATION OF WATER TANK FOR VEHICLE - ADOPTED IN TH! ^MOUNT OF $fi,OOO Com~issioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner pistor And carried 3/0, that Budget Amendment No. 82-64, provi~ing for the purchase of a pump system and fabrication of a water tank for a vehicle (Road and Bridge/Transportation Department), be adopted in the amount of $6,000. page 26 ~OOK 067 fACt 685 March 2, 198:1 BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 82-65 (TRANSPORTATION» FOR REPLACEMENT or COPEL1\ND DRIOCE - ADOPTED IN THE AMOUNT OF 514,000 ---- --- Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner pistor and carried 3/0, that Budget Amendment No. 82-65, for L;,e purchaso of material and replacement of Copeland Bridge (Road and Bridge/Transportation Department), be adopted in the amount of $14,000. Page 27 ~-,__""~"""",,,,,,,,,, &OOK C 6 7 PACt 687 March 2, 1982 REVISIONS or AUDITOR'S CONTRACT (HOLCHER, TAYLOR' COMPANY) - AUTHORIZED FOR CHAr~MAN'S SIGNATURE Chief Deputy Clerk/Fiscal Officer Harold Hall recommended that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute certain revisions not to exceed $9,000 which provide for extended services to the contract with the auditing firm, Holcher, Taylor & Company, P.A. Commissioner Wenzel so moved. Commissioner pistor seconded the motion which carried 3/0. pag e 28 March 2, 1982 &O~K C 6 7 fACt 689 THREE DAYS' RENTAL OF THE DEPOT AT $45 PER DAY FOR SALE OF TAX CERTIFICATES - APPROVED Vice-Chairman Kruse r~ported that Tax Collector Guy Carlton has requested authorization to rent a room at The Depot in which to conduct the sale of Tax Certificates for three days. She said that the cost will be $45 per ~ay. Commis'1on~r Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor ðnd carried 3/0, that the Tax Collector be authorized to rent space at The Depot for three days to conduct the sale of Tax Certificates, at a cost of $45 per day. CERTIFICATES OF CORRECTION TO TAX ROLL AS PPESENTED BY PROPERTY APPR^ISER'S OFFICE - AUTHORIZED FOR EXECUTION BY CHAIRMAN Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner pistor and carried 3/0, that the Chairman be authorized to execute the fo110win9 CertIficates of Co~rection to the Tax Roll, as presJntød by the Property Appraiser's office: 1977 TAX ROLL DATES NUMBERS 437 2/18/82 1981 TAX ROLL 2/17/82 - 2/22/82 433 - 441 1981 TAX ROLL TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY 8l-l02 - 81-116 2/18/82 MR. MILES SCOFIELD APPOINTED TO FILL VACANCY DUE TO RESIGNATION OP MR. ST^NLEY BROOKS FROM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, PELICAN B^Y IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Commissioner pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel ðnd Page 29 March 2, 1982 carried 3/0, that Mr. Miles Scofield be appointed to fill the vacancy on the Board of SupervIsors, Pelican Bay Improvement District, as requested by the District's Board of Supervisors, dUP to the resigna- tion of Mr. Stanley Brooks, effective March, 1982. RESIGNATION OF MRS. M^Y SHEEHAN FROM LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD ACCEPTED AND APPROPRIATE LETTER OF APPRECI^TION AUTHORIZED Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carried 3/0, that the resignation of Mrs. May Sheehan from the Library Advisory Board be accepted and that the approprIate letter of appreciation be au~horized. MR. GARY TICE APPOINTED AS REGULAR MEMBER ON LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD Commissioner Wenzel moved. seconded by Commissioner fistor and cðrrled 3/0, that, pursuant to Board policy, present alternate memb~r Mr. Gary Tice be appolnt~d to serve as a Regular member on the Library Advisory BOdrd, filling the vacancy due to Mrs. Sheehan's resignation. 38 DAYS GAIN ~lME APPROVED FOR TNM^~E ~2~19~ Commissioner Wenzel moved, seconded by Commissioner pistor and carried 3/0, that )8 days extra gain time be approved for Inmate '26196, changing the date of release to 3/4/82, as recommended by Sheriff Aubrey Rogers. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE - FILED AND/OR REFERRED There being no objection, the Chair directed the following correspondence be filed and/or referred to the various departments as Page 30 BOOK 067 PAcr:690 ··,_......_··_~"'~~,.··__....-"""""...""-r ßOOK 067 PACé 691' indicatedr March 2, 1982 l. Copies of the following minutes received and filed: A. EMSAC, 2/23/82 B. Marco Island Beautification C0~mittee, 2/23/82 C. Contractors LicensIng Board, 2/16/82 2. Copy of letter dated 2/24/82 from Chairman Jim Stackpoole, Marco Island Beautification Committee, to County M3nager Norman re denial of newspaper stand permits in any Marco Island swales. Filed. 3. Copy of lett.er dated 2/24/82 from Chairman JIm Stackpoole, Marco Island BeautifIcation Committee, to Mr. & Mrs. Kneebones, 970 Maple Ct., Marco Island, re written complaint re needed seawall repair, parked truck and unkept landscaping on saId property. Filed. 4. Letter dated 2/22/82 from Jennifer DeVeaux, The Travelers Special Representative, requesting information for client Lawrence and El;ine Cravy, as to whether repairs were necessary tu damaged guard rail on State Rd. 29S, 5 mllE:s north of State Rd. 053, 10 miles south of Immokalee. xc Messrs. Norman and Barksdale. Filed. 5. Letter dated 2/25/82 from Roger F. Turner, Lakewood Condominium Association Unit One President, registering opposition to any sidewalk-bike path assessment to the Association; opposition rcgistered to the document dated 2/4/82 submitted by Robert o. Cooling re subject. xc Messrs. Norman and Barksdale. Filed. 6. Copy of letter received 3/1/82 from Loton Williams, Arnold & Company, P.A. which ask questions related to rate setting f~r garbage franchises operated in this County. xc Messr~. Norman and Barksdale. Filed. 7. Letter dated 2/26/82 from Attorney Allen R. Samuels, InternatIonal Locator Service, (ILS) re Tax Deed Sale Overbid contracted with Mr. and Mrs. Gene W. Bouck to collect unclaimed funds (10/21/81); case in litigation; requests copy of Proof of Claim. Copy of letter dated 10/19/81 from Pat Traylor, ILS, to Mr. & Mrs. Bouck. xc Clerk William R. Reagan. Filed. 8. Copy of 2/17/82 letter from Steven W. Martin, to various agencies registering his opposition to the Marco Utili- ties Sewage Outfall in Marco River, Permit ApplicatIon No. 82R-0136, and requesting a public hearing be held on same. xc Mr. Berzon. Filed. 9. Memo dated 2/25/82 from Sherrie Brook, International pag e 31 M,uch 2, 1982 Systems, Inc. to Chris Holl ing, (Holley), ro ^PP-TR^CK REPORT on Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program; County application for $173,000 still under review. Filed. 10. Copy of letter dated 2/17/82 from Or~men~~ Fleming,Com- munlty Development Director, International 5ystems, Inc. to Community Development Director Virta re CDBG funds. F 11 ed . 11. Copy of letter dated 2/24/82 from St. Lucie County Attorney Devitt J. Adams transmitting Resolution No. 82-23/Department of Transportation Regulations for Counties. xc Me3~rs. Norman and Bark5dale. Filed. l2. Notice received 2/26/82 from Florida Department of Veteran and Community Affairs indicating change of address for the Bureau of Highway Safety, Department of Veteran and Community Affairs, 2571 Executive Center Circle East, Tallahassee, Florida 32301. xc Mr. Barksdale; Filed. l3. Memorandum dated 2/25/82 from Florida Panhandle Regional EMS Management Organizaion, Inc., transmitting a copy of EMS Trust Fu~d Legislation, H~ 752 and SB 231, urging support thereof. xc Mr. Norman; Filed. l4. Letter dated 2/l5/~2 from Department of Veteran and Community Affairs, transmitting informatio~ required in preparing t~e Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act Appraisal Report, required pursuant to Florida Statutes, s.163.319l. xc Mr. Norman; Filed. 15. Letter dated 2/24/82 from DNR transmItting updated information re ·Save Our Coast" program and outlining a revised schedule for considering applications thereto. xc Mr. Norman; Filed. 16. Letter dated 2/22/82 from John J. Coghlan, offering suggestions for limiting the noise at the library. xc Mr. Norman; Filed. 17. Letter dated 2/18/82 from INFORM, transmitting a copy of a study re land and wat~r resource use practices and related brochures. Filed. ~ * . The meeting was recessed at 9:43 A.M. and reconvened at 1:30 P.M., at which time Deputy Clerk Davidson was replaced by Deputy Clerk Keoyon. * * * :>.a~e 32 &OOK 067 PAti 692 - March 2, 1982 aOOK 067 PACt 693 THREE: CONSU~':'INC FIRMS RE WATER, SEWER AND ROAD CONSTRUCTION (PINE RIDG~ INDUSTRIAL PARK MSTU) SELECTED AND AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE NUMBER ONE FIRM: HOLE, MONTES/WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL & PEEK - APPROVED. __.. CH2M HILL Mr. Robert Ghiotto, Vice President, Regional Manager of CH2M Hill stated that Mr. Greg Tate, the Project Manager for th~ project, and Mr. Larry Pensen, the FInancIal Economics Expert, were present to present an approach to the Pine Ridge Industrial Project. Mr. Tate stated that there are a number of tasks to be accomplished in the project referring to a flow chart which had been prepõred for the presentation. He reported that the fIrst step would be to assess the goals and the needs of the project, adding that the two prime decision makers would be Collier County and the property owners. He stated that once the goals and needs are assessed, the first phase would be the preliminary engineering phase, ~dding that the first step of this phase would be to conduct the site inventory which will consist of researching and identifying existing easements, rights-of-way, and boundaries to essentially end up with a plat map of Pine Ridge Industrial Park. He said that the next step would be to develop the interstructure master plan whIch would consist of the streets, drainage, water and sewer. He reported that once these steps were developed, the next step would be the developing funding alternatives. He reported that these steps would be stated in the prelimInary engineering report and submitted for review and approval to the County and the property owners. He said that after the preliminary engineering report, an action plan would be developed with the county Page 33 Much 2, 1982 and the property owners. He noted that after a review step, the final design phase would be entered, followed by the services during construction phase, adding that concurrent to ~ðme, a rate study should be considered, which would at that point, be the project completion. He concluded by stating that the engineering aspects of the project are straight forward with nothing particularly complex, adding that the financial aspects of this project would be the challenge. Mr. Larry Pensen stated that in the current volatile financial market, funds that are necessary to finance comprehensive capital improvement programs have proven to be a thorny issue for most that have tried. He reported that in the last few years CH2M Hill has been recommending a fairly comprehensive approach to developing financing programs. He referred to the chart stating that the approach recommended would be in three phases, being an analysis phase, a financial planning phase, and an implementation phase. He stated that In the analysis phase there are always certain legal parameters such as the laws that create special districts such as municipal ser~ices, taxing units, water and se~er districts which allow assessing, special other kinds of agreements and contracts as City/County franchises, adding that all of these mðy provide opportunities or may provide avenues that through re-negotiations or changing the ground rules may provide revenues that could not b~ obtained otherwise. He reported that in the taxation parameters there are certain actions that the County can take in a funding program that could present opportunities to the landholders that would make the project more attractive to the property owners such as floating bonds, special revenue bonðs, general obligation bonds, or assessment, but keeping in mind what kind of &OaK 067 PACt 694 Page 34 March 2, 1982 BODK .067 PACt 695 conditions and tax advantages the approach or approaches ·t~ken would ~ffer to tne landhoiders who are going to be aff~cted. He stated that there are a number of financial alte~natives that would be applicable to this project, adding that once the analysis Is completed the County and CH2M Hill would meet to go through a financial planning program which would indicate an inventory of financing funds or access to funds, select an alternative, and then schedule the acquisition of funds in acco~dance wIth the Capital Improvements Program expenditure patterns. He stated that any slIppage between the acquisition of funå~ and the expenditures, there would be assistanc~ in the development of ~n investment program which would allow the County to take advantage of certain arbitrage that is available under the rules of the U. S. Treasury. He further noted that after planning and scheduling Is completed, there would be a recommendatIon that CH2M Hill assist in the implementation program to p~ovide continuity from the beginning to the completion of the project. He conc]uded by stating that the recommendation is for an objective comprehensive approach for the financing of this kind of capital improvement program, adding that CH2M Hill bell~ves a program L~n be set up that meets the County requirements. Mr. Ghiotto stated CH2M Hill is familiar with the project area, as well as the engineering aspects and the laws and rules under which the County operates. He indicated that during the water/sewer aspect one consideration is that this area is in the franchise area of the City of Naples and the County might want to open up a re-negotiation with the City in order to perhaps obtain a wholesale rate so that the revenue from the users could fund certain aspects of the project. He concluded Page 3S -...- - .. ... -... -..- - ~ ... .. - - ..- ... H'.lCh 2, 1982 ty stating that he was ready to answe~ any que~tlor.s regArd1n9 the qu~llfications of CH2M Hill and the approach to the project. Commissioner Wenzel asked Mr. Berzon, Ut:.1i ties Manager, if the COlnly was at one time conslderin9 running the sewer line up the railroad right-of-way to the plant or was the City to assume this oblIgation? Mr. Berzon replIed that there was nothing specific, adding that there will probably be a line running from the Pine Ridge ROÐd area north. He said that this could have a bearing on the proje~~ ~s to the direction the project would be drained and how it would be arranged. Mr. Tat~ stated ~hat CH2M Hill w~uld like to look at the treatmen~ '.ransport disposal options available In the preliminary engineering phase as proposed Emerald Lakes is immediately to the North and Pine =:ldg8 Middle School is to the West, so that perha¡."s 1I combinlltlon of oither treating together or pumping together to the North Naples Plant could be utilized. There being no further discussion, Vice Chairman Kruse chanked tÞ~m for their presentation. GEE , JENSON t I ¡ I I ! ¡ f I , Mr. Frank Viscary and Mr. Arthur Quinnell represented Gee & J.nson. Mr. Viscary stated that Gee' Jenson employs approximately 350 I .'ple, ~.1ding that there is a west coast office in Ft. Myers that has upward of 40 personnel which includes a mix of planners, drafters, architects, engineers and supporting sta ff. He stat;ed the recent works of Cee , Jenson which have been accomplished in the entire realm of civil engineering and other type projects. He sl.ið that Gee , Jenson does handle large water distribution projects, water and wastewater ~ U67 fACt:696 Pa98 36 ...... . ........ " ·~ .ë .., :0;:- ~iË ~ ~ .. :s .!J o ~ ;.9.s 'TIt; 1 ~ "111 81' ='1 ~ II 60:JK 067 FACi697 March 2, 1982 ~~e~~menr. -r.rt r.o!lftr.tlon syste~s, water management studies~ (~~"ø, ~n~ :'.:.:..1 dev~:':"~;õlC:-"~ ',::...~~. ~e reported th.Jt the firm has worked "-::':. closely with envl:onmental groups, adding that in this particul~r Ar:: they hav~ worked with the Pelican Bay project, the Cocohatchee BasIn study, the Forest Lakes area, the pine Ridge Industrial Park, Pino Ridge Developments for Collier Development corporation and victoria Park are~, a~d are presently ~orking on a p:oject of 400 units j~:.' north of the Callier line. He stated that, with regards to t~~ specific project, investigative engineering has been done, adding th~t one of the areas th.Jt may be troublesome is the water management and the apparent lack of draInage within the project sIte, adding th~~ hi~ firm is extremely strong in this pa~ticular area. He stated t~at he i. quite cognizant of various methods that are usef.ul tools for fundin~ such projects. He said that he has worked on bond iflsues and "'\IS ¡I forme:- co,"mission~r of ð s~wa9f: auth'or i ty, ad6 i r.g that th~ f 1 ria} hd S. ca.1 assessment specialist on board with much experience in the area::¡ of funding with the ability to be flex ible. Mr. Arthur Quinnell 3tated that he has laid out a pro9~am (or ~~~ pine Ridge Industrial Park area in three phases, adding that the first and most import~nt of the phases is the preliminary studios ~'~ch would include cost-effective alternatives for each of the utiliti~s th~t ~r : being considered. He stated that there would be a cost-effectlvi program for a particular type of sewer, whereby it could be a ¡vrc~ main running mil~s or it could be by temporary plant until such time as another could be connected to it and the funding more ev~nl~ distributed throughout the area. He reported that the water would bJ a I<,:::jor fa.:':or 83 ~~~ :::¡¡;:\"'y do.)s not h.:'¡e the water faclltie::J to :::C:;',": )aC'.1 ;7 . ....-.. . . ..- March 2, 1982 ho~ever, by constructing them within the park and using bulk water from the City ør other means, this could take care of the water. He saId that roadway reconstruction would have to be don~ as very few of the roads, if any, within the park are owned or have been turned over to the County for maintenance, which would also be another major portion of the project. He stated that within the area there are no recorded accepted plats, adding that the entire area has been built on lands that are part of unrecorded plats or mete~ and bounds surveys. He Sð,'.d that there arc four or fiv~ unr~corded plats that have easements. that do not go down streets, adding that they drc drainage easements and utility eaSe!llents, further noting that everything should be taken int'o consider~tion to find the most cost-effective method of placing the utilities, which would be to utilize the land and the easements as they are, to the utmost, to keep the project within tho bounds that the people can afford. He stated that economIcs has to be considered quite strongly in this particular area. He reported that the firm is qu1te familiar with fundSng, taxation districts, and tax assessment districts. He summarized by stating that the preli~inary phase is the ~ost important, adding that one needs a direction to go before one can get there, which would mean concentration on the first phase. He concluded by stating that the second phase Is design and the third phase construction, further stating that withou~ the first or preliminary phase or the overall answcrs which are required, the project could become a shamble. Mr. Frank Vi scary stated that Gee & Jenson is re~dy, willing and able to provIde the necessary services for the project, furth~r· indicating that the firm has been known to cut schedules in half. He Pðge 38 laoK 067 1'.\ti 898 \ March 2, 1982 eoOK 067 PACi 699 concluded the presentation by stating that the firm would be ve~Y pleased to perform (or Collier County. Vice Chairman Kruse questioned whether concreto and asphalt were becoming cost competitive on roads, to which Mr. Quinnell replied ·yes·. HOLE MONTES/WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, SOLL & PEEK Mr. Stanely Hole, Presidpnt of H~le Montes Associates, statod th~t the firm of Hole Montes Associates and the firm of Wilson, MIller, Barton, 5011 & Peek have elected to offer the capabilities of the two firms as a single entity. He stated that the consultant selection committee has selected five firms that were felt to be the most capable of providing the services for this projectr adding that his joint vpoture was one of the five. He stated that all five firms are technically qualified, adding that, however, the joint venture offers four particular advantages. He stated the flr=t advantage as being more familiar with the area than the other firms; the second advantage being the employment of 100 plus local families with a sense of responsIbility and an interest in Collier County; the third advantage being Naples is the home of both firms in the joint venture which makes it easier for all to stay familiar and current with the project, f'-: it is also easier to complain if such complaints are warranted; and the fourth advantage being that neither firm is a branch office which means that when the work is completed the firms will still be in Naples to handle the comments regardIng the quality of the work. He concluded by stating that the joint venture of Hole Montes/Wilson, Miller, B~rton, SolI & Peek would like to work for Collier County and hopes that pðge 39 ..""".~~."",.,..'~·M'.__"._' Ma r c h 2, 1 98 2 Collier County would like the joint venture working for them aa they all have an investment in the community. Mr. Tom Peek, Vice President of Wilson, Miller, Barton, SolI' Peek, stated that as a joint venture he was selected to serve as the project Manager, adding t~at the joint venture came about when the request for proposals were received. He stated that, at that time, it was determined that each firm was qualified to do thp. work as well as having a lot of experIence in the County and with th~ County, as well as in the particular area of pIne Ridge Industrial Pðrk. He stated that all felt it would best serve the County if there was ð joint venture to collectiveiy put the talents and experiences together to pl1:-Gue the project. He stated that there was no .'!dditlonal regiGtration required for the joint venture, also adding that both firms carry the proper liability insurance to protect the County. He stated that Hole Montes is currently in the process of designing the four-lanlng of pine Ridge Road during which time they have become very familiar with the drainage system in the area. He further noted that Wilbon, Miller, Barton, SolI & Peek is currently designing the four-lanll,g of Frank Road which connects onto the portion of pine Ridge Road just west of the pine Ridge Industrial Park, adding that they have donp ~ll of the work for the Moorings Park Retirement Center as well as the ~...,,~.r!ngs Pari< Estates, the BëHron Collier High School, the YMCA, ðnd the pine Ridge Middle School. He indicated that they are noW working on the extension of Frank Road to the north which connects to Emerald Lakes, further indicating that they have extensive e;(perielice In and around the project. He stated that they have a very intimate understanding of the project scope and the project ftrea. He referred ~ 067 PAt&: 700 fage 40 --,-'--'.- &I)()K 067 FAct 701 March 2, 1982 to an orgðnization~l chart demonstrating how the project will be hðndled it they are selected. He stated that he would serve as the joint venture proj~ct manager¡ Stanley Hole would serve to coordinate the regulatory agencies and the requirements for ~hose agencies; the paving and drðlnage portion of the project would be handled by Dan Brundage of Hole Montes; Rick Barber of wilson, Miller, Barton, 5011 , Peek would be the prime designer of the utilities, and Sergio Montes would be in charge of the fill survey and the research for the right-of-way areas. He stated that by combining all these people together with the Staff there would be the requIred expertise for the project. He said that, in regards to assessment projects, he was the project manager for the Kelly Road ~later line system and for the Willoughby Acres water/sewer system, adding that his firm also did the Marco Island Phase I and is looking forward to the Marco Island phase II of which he stated he would be project manager. He concluded by stati~g that they sIncerely desire to have the job. To Commissioner Pistor's question regarding financing problems, Mr. Peek stated that they have worked with two or three financial consultant~ on other pro~!cts, and a lot would depend upon whðt the ~1nan~ial scope of work is as to which firm would be selected. Vice Chairman Kruse questioned whether concrete and asphalt were _03t competit~ve In today's market as material for roads, to which Mr. Peek &~at~ '~ðt in some areas they are. He indicat~d that in parking lots a~d In ow volume traffic areas where the total structural ctrength c-C thickness of the material is not as great, it was reported that con" ete could be competitive. He stated that in high volume roadwaY3, such as an industrial park, the concrete broke down because Page 41 .,. March 2, 1982 of the structural thicknesses. He concluded by stating that when the thickness is increased beyond 6 or 8 inches, it was not cost compet\clve. EQ?T, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC. Mr. Jerry Eckerd, Regional Manager of the Naples Office of Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. stateè that the firm employs 15 people and is a local company, adding that the firm has a present involvement with Collier County on the Golden Gate Parkway; is also working on a design for the 7 mile raw water main for the new regional water plant and has also been involved ir; ~~llcan Bay as engineers for the Pelican Bay Improvement District, adding that as directly relates to this ;;Qj~ct is the engineers for Sewer District "A-. He stated that pine Ridge Industrial Park is situated in the southern portIon of Sewer District -A", adding that the firm's experience with Sewer District -A- A!nds itself to the contInued involvement for thIs project because this project is one of the keys for the overall development of Sewer District -A-. He said that the primary emphasis on the project is the initial phase, the engineering report and a detailed master plan from the standpoint of paving, dralnaye, water and sewer. He stated that the paving becomes somewhat incidental as it is a develop~d property, adding that the drainage has been developed in a haphazard manner for the ~ost part as a byproduct of the development of individual parcels whereby borrow pits were built to provide fill for the individual building pads. He stated that this needs to be looked at and developed to more adequately handle the present drainage and bring it up to present standards. He reported that the master plan and the Page 42 ~~~~ ,----..~"""'1'""'" T aOOK 067 PAGi 703 March 2, 1982 engineering report provides the starting point for the ultimate detailed design planning and construct1on of the improvements to the property. He said that within t~e (cFort there would be investigation of various alternatives both frQm the standpoint of construction with different types of materials and phasing which could have several methods. He stated that the primary needs for water and s~wer lie in the western half of the development which would be the best place to start any improvements. He indicated that the phasIng could also be done from a standpoint of function by utility, either a portion of t~ð water and sewer built or a portion of the overall drainage. He noted that the project has been set up as a taxing district which means that it can be financed from assessment of the existing property owners, adding that there is other alternative financIng available. He stated that his firm has a substantial a~ount of experience dealing with different federal funding progr'~~ in addition to some state and other financing programs which would be an asset to the County. He re~rted that the project does lend itself to some potential expansion within Sewer District -A- to provide services along the way to other properties, adding that Lhere are four or five potential developments within the are~ ~hich could be beneficial to the project as far as the standpoint of sharing the burden of costs and possibly providing land on an interim basis for an off-site temporary sewer plant and could also provide water storage capahilities for fire protection in the area. He also stated that other developments could be called upon to share the burden of any major transmission lines or distribution lines to the Sewer District "A- plant. Mr. Eckerd further stated that there have been several innovative design features looked at that could be Page 43 March 2, 1982 utilized such as the possibili~y of going to an entire pressure sewer system which would eliminate the possibility of deep cuts as there is rock in the area and the deeper the cut the more expensive it becomes. He stated that specific recommendations would be made in the en9ineering report to indicate how and when the facility should be built as well as the method of financing and different alternatives. He reported that the Master Plan and engineering report should be done where control can be exercised both with the County ðnd the consulting firm utilized, adding that this eliminates duplication of effort and provides better coordination with property owners and County Staff and eliminates necessity for re-negotiations and haphazard method of providing services to this district. He reported that once the master pl~n and engineering report hac ~een completed, the work could be broken up in any manner that is ~_~i:ed as long as the detailed master pl~n is followed. He indicated that the master plan would include such features as minimum road grades, minimum finish .' f·~""..r elevations on the future development portions of the property which would 1efinitely have an affect on drainage capabilities within the area, sizes and tYþ'i,.: pipes, general locations for these lines, and types of I'....'-_~lals. He stated tha t with this knowledge the detailed master plan ,·"..ld be accomplished in a much more efficient and cost-effective iflanner and would be a sav i ngs to the County and prope r ty owner s if it becomes an assessment program. He concluded by stating that the firm is desirous of doing the work and is in a position to start work immediately, as well as being qualified and able to do the project within the time schedule and the budget. To Commissioner Plstor's question regðrding the finðncing, ";r. r.oDX 067 ~~ 704 Page 44 - 800K 067 PAGt 705 March 2, 1982 Eckerd stated that the firm does have experience ðlong these lines and would definitely be making recommcõJations ònd would be available, adding that a lot would depend on the situation as to what extent the firm would be involved. Commissioner Pistor questioned if th~ presssure sewer system would be within the industrial park only and hook into some kind of a transmission line to go to the plant. Mr. Eckerd replIed that this would be a forced main system wherehy each indivIdual busIness within the industrial park would have there own grinder pump, essentially a small lift station, which would become a manifold force main system, adding that they would pump into the master force main which would run to the plðnt which is very similar to a typical gravity system. To Commissioner pistor's question of the cost of grinder pumps, Mr. Eckerd replied that the pumps would be relatively small and the individual property owners would have to buy and maintaIn them, adding that there are pros and cons, but would be an alternatIve to look at. Commissioner ,>' ", ")[ stated that it could be more costly to some individuals that hook in, than some other source. Mr. Eckerd concluded by stating that this would have to b~ investigat~A in the report to determine the most economical and cost-feasible alternative, adding that a system of this type would cost less from a construction standpoint, especIally everything that would be within rights-of-way. W^TSON AND C0:"'ANY ,-- Mr. Paul F~l1ner of Watson and Company stated that he had two engineers available to address the particulars of the project, adding that James Carter would be project manager and Fred Eastman, project Page 45 March 2, 1982 en"ineer. Mr. James Carter stated that as project manager he would be in charge of the day-to-day operation of the project, coordination, Gcheduling ðnd working closely with the project engineer, Fred Eastman, adding that he has done a number of similar projects over the past few years successfully. He stated that Fred Eastman, who will be the chIef technical man to cover all aspects of the project would like to discuss in detail some of the aspects of the project. Mr. Eastman stated that in the last 12 years they have had 11 projects concernin~ the planning of industrial parks, adding that a have been put under construction. He stated that on this particular project, all utilIty information would be collected, i.e., rights-of-way, easements, which would have a beðrinq on t\1e cost of the project and/or its feasibility geometrically, including all local planning and state planning that may be involved. He reported that a magnitude number would be developed based on acreage to get a dollar amount as quickly as possible in order to check into Lhe financing acpects. He stated that there would be coordination developed with the existing residential development to the south and the planned one to the north as they are also short water and sewer, adding that perhaps the three together would ease the financial burden to each. He reported that th~re would be constant coordination maintained with the County Engineer's office and the Utilities Department. He said that the businesses in the park would be inventoried with a particular emphasIs on the effluents that they may be putting out from body shops, painting shops, and stripping shops, adding that some of the materi~ls that come out of tho~e in~tallations could get into a package treatment aOOK 067 fAGt 706 .!age 46 'BOOK 067 fAGi 707 March 2, 1982 plant and kill it. H~ indicated that financing methods that would be looked at would be in the Chapter 159 area tor industrial develop~ðnt bonds. He 5ðid th~t they have been in financing for 12 years, adding that he has been responsible for all the feasibilitï of bond studies for the Tampa Port Authority. He ~tated that at the point when the planning has been set, the execution for the work would be out of the Fort Myers office and backed up out of Tampa. He concluded by stating that the firm has been through this enough, so that th~y would be some real value to the County. Mr. Carter said he would like to summarIze by stating that this is a very challenging project and the key to the professional services required are in the first phase where all the planning and setting of the scope is required. He conclud~d by stating that it would be an interesting proj~ct which Watson and Company would like to do for the County. VOTING Voting ballots were presented to the Board for first, second and third choice. Upon collection and counting of the ballots, Harold Hall, Chief Dcputy Clerk/Fiscal Officer, stated t:.at Hole, Montes/Wilson, Miller, Barton, SoIl and Peek received 3 first place votes, and further noted that there was not a majority for the second place vote. He indicated that another vote would be needed for second and third place positions. Commissioner Wenzel stated that the second place votes would probably be the same, adding that the Board should know what the second place votes were. Mr. Cliff B3rksdale, Public Works Administrator, stated that second place votes were one each for Gee & Je~~~n, Watson · Page 47 .... I MInch 2, 1982 Company, and CH2M Hill, adding that Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jerniga~, Inc. received two votes for third place and Watson & Company received one. Commissioner Wenzel questioned whether two out of three votes would be enough for third place to which Mr. Barksdale stated that there was not a clear majority. Fiscal Officer Hall stated for the record that under the Competitive Negotiations Act there would be a second and third choice requ ired. tommissioner Wenzel stated that Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, In~. had two out of three votes for third place which should be enough :s it is a majc~ity. Upon coller.tlon and counting ballots for second ðnd third place, Mr. Barksdale ~tated that Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. h~d two out of three ~ota~ for third place and would, therefore, take third posi tion. Mr. Barksdale stated that it would now be necessary to ~ote for a second place between CH2M Hill, Gee & Jenson, and Watson & Company. Upon collection and counting of the ballots, Mr. Barksdale stated that CH2M Hill received two votes which would make them second place. Mr. Barksdale reported that first place would be Hole Montes/Wilson, Hiller, B~rton, SoIl and Peek; second place would be CH2M Hill, and third place would be Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. Commissioner Pistor moved, seconded by Commissioner Wenzel and carried 3/0, that the following three consulting firms re water, sewer and road construction (Pine Ridge Industrial Park MSTU) be selected in order of preference and authorization for negotiations with the number &oO?: 067 w.i 708 Pag e 4 R BOOK 0 it,; 7 PACt' 709 Mðrch 2, 1982 one firm be approvedJ 1. Hole Montc~/Wilson, Kl:ler, Bartoh, 5011 & Peek 2. CH2M lUll 3. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. * * Qo . . * * * * * meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair - Time: 3:00 P.M. There being no further business for the good of the County, the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL l~ _~~ ~Y-FRANCES K E, VICE CHAIRMAN ~1i1rch 16, 1982 d by the BCC on 'presented x,'- or as corrected , I "\ '. . 1.....-,...0 ~ as Page 49 *