Loading...
HEX Agenda 06/14/2018 AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY,JUNE 14,2018 IN CONFERENCE ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING&REGULATION BUILDING,2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE,NAPLES,FLORIDA INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO,AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: NOTE: This item was continued from the May 24, 2018 HEX Meeting and is further continued to the July 12,2018 HEX Meeting. A. PETITION NO. VA-PL20160002427 — Florida Power & Light Company requests a variance from Section 5.05.09 G.2.a of the Land Development Code to reduce the minimum setback from 225 feet to 77 feet for the western property boundary shared with the Brandon RPUD, to allow for replacement of a utility pole and collocation of wireless communications facilities on property located on the south side of Veterans Memorial Boulevard, approximately one third mile east of Livingston Road, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 20± acres. [Coordinator: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] NOTE: This item was continued from the May 24, 2018 HEX Meeting and is further continued to the July 12,2018 HEX Meeting. B. PETITION NO. VA-PL20160002426 — Florida Power & Light requests a variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to reduce the east setback from 235 feet to 173 feet, the south setback from 235 feet to 55 feet, and the west setback from 235 feet to 133 feet, to allow for replacement of a utility pole and collocation of wireless communications facilities on property located at 4995 Davis Boulevard in Section 6, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,Florida. [Coordinator: James Sabo,AICP,Principal Planner] C. PETITION NO. VA-PL20140001930 — Angelo and Gail Lucarelli request a variance from Section 4.02.01 A, Table 2.1 of the Land Development Code to reduce the minimum side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 4.5 feet for property located on the west side of Euclid Avenue, approximately one half mile north of Immokalee Road, in Section 24, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator:John Kelly, Senior Planner] D. PETITION NO. BDE-PL20170003371 —Kevin Hale requests a 24-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 44 feet to construct a docking facility to accommodate one vessel for the benefit of Lot 17, Landings at Bear's Paw subdivision, also described as 1672 Vinland Way, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] 4. OTHER BUSINESS 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN AGENDA ITEM 3-A This item was continued from the May 24, 2018 HEX meeting and is further continued to the July 12, 2018 HEX meeting. The packet materials were submitted at the May 24, 2018 HEX meeting. PETITION NO. VA-PL20160002427— Florida Power & Light Company requests a variance from Section 5.05.09 G.2.a of the Land Development Code to reduce the minimum setback from 225 feet to 77 feet for the western property boundary shared with the Brandon RPUD, to allow for replacement of a utility pole and collocation of wireless communications facilities on property located on the south side of Veterans Memorial Boulevard, approximately one third mile east of Livingston Road, in Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 20± acres. [Coordinator: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] AGENDA ITEM 3-B This item was continued from the May 24, 2018 HEX meeting and is further continued to the July 12, 2018 HEX meeting. The packet materials were submitted at the May 24, 2018 HEX meeting. PETITION NO. VA-PL20160002426—Florida Power & Light requests a variance from Section 5.05.09.G.2.a of the Land Development Code to reduce the east setback from 235 feet to 173 feet, the south setback from 235 feet to 55 feet, and the west setback from 235 feet to 133 feet, to allow for replacement of a utility pole and collocation of wireless communications facilities on property located at 4995 Davis Boulevard in Section 6, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: James Sabo, AICP, Principal Planner] AGENDA ITEM 3-D Go i fier GOu-.ty STAFF RE Pa RT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: June 14, 2018 SUBJECT: BDE-PL20170003371, 1672 VINLAND WAY, HALE DOCK PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Headwaters Development, LLLP P.O. 110062 Naples, FL 34108 Applicant: Kevin C. and Marlene L. Hale (Contract Purchasers) 1925 Tarpon Road Naples, FL 34102 Agent: Turrell, Hall, and Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 RE UESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests a 24 -foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 -foot limit established in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for a total protrusion of 44 feet as measured from the property line/top of bank, the most restrictive points of measure, to construct a new single-family dock facility with boat lift to accommodate a single vessel of up to 34 feet in length. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 1672 Vinland Way; legally described as Lot 17, Landings at Bears Paw, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) BDE-PL20170003371, Hale Dock Page 1 of 8 ver. FINAL, HEX 6/14118 Location Map Petition Number: PL20170003371 Zoning Map PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of the project is to seek approval for a boat dock extension application for a new single-family home being constructed within the Landings at Bear's Paw PUD project along the man-made portion of the Gordon River. The proposed boat dock facility protrudes 44 feet from the property line and top of the bank, the most restrictive measurements. The total decking area for the dock is proposed at 637 square feet (sf) with 547 sf of deck area proposed over water. The proposed dock has a boat lift option. The proposed extension request is 10 feet over the allowable 20 -foot maximum protrusion from the mean high-water line. There is one slip proposed for the dock facility, and the boat length is 34 feet. The proposed dock meets the minimum setback requirements of 7.5 feet on each side. Three BDE applications that were previously approved by the Hearing Examiner (HEX) near this boat dock extension request: 1. 1696 Vinland Way, approved on 5/11/2018; 2. 1692 Vinland Way, approved on 411312017; and 3. 1688 Vinland Way, approved on 9/22/2016. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: Landings at Bears Paw RPUD - residential SURROUNDING: North: Landings at Bears Paw RPUD, residential single-family East: Landings at Bears Paw RPUD, residential single-family South: Rural Agricultural District (A) then Residential Single -Family -4 (RSF-4), Golden Gate canal then residential single-family West: Landings at Bears Paw RPUD, residential single-family BDE-PL20170003371, Hale Dock Page 3 of 8 ver. FINAL, HEX 8114118 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The proposed dock is to be constructed waterward of the existing riprap revetment. A submerged resources survey provided by the applicant found no submerged resources in the area 200 feet beyond the proposed docking facility. The Submerged Resources Survey provides an aerial illustrating that no seagrasses were observed within 200 feet. This project does not require an Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) review, because this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. STAFF ANALYSIS: The HEX shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny, a dock facility extension request based on the following criteria. In order for the HEX to approve this request, it must be determined that at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria have been met. Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 5.03.06.H and finds the following: Primary Criteria 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The total waterfront length of the subject property is 67 -feet. The zoning and upland land use is single-family residential which warrants no more than two boat slips as per the LDC and the Landings at Bear's Paw RPUD, which states that no more than two boat slips may be constructed on each single-family residential lot, up to a maximum of 38 boat slips within the RPUD. As a single boat slip is proposed at this location which is consistent with both this PUD and the LDC. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion met. According to the survey submitted by the petitioner, the water depth at 20 -foot protrusion from the top of bank is 1.1 feet and over rip -rap; therefore there BDE-PL20170003371, Hale Dock Page 4 of 8 ver. FINAL, HEX 6/14/18 is insufficient water depth to moor a vessel or provide safe access to the docking facility at mean low tide without approval of the subject extension. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. According to the survey drawing submitted by the petitioner, the width of the navigable waterway is 123+/- feet from Mean High Water (MHW) to MHW. The proposed boat dock will not impact a marked or charted navigable channel and there is sufficient space for navigation should a dock be constructed on the opposite side of the waterway. The survey document has been provided as part of the packet materials. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25% of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50% of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion met. The proposed docking facility protrudes approximately 30 -feet from the Mean High Water Line (MHWL) into a waterway that is 123 -feet wide from MHW to MHW. The proposed dock protrudes approximately 25% into the waterway and therefore as proposed the subject dock satisfies this criterion. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility provides 7.5 -foot setbacks from the property/riparian lines to the east and west. The approved Landing's at Bear's Paw RPUD only requires 7.5 -foot setbacks for a docking facility that is parallel to the shoreline. The dock location is within setbacks and will not interfere with any lawfully constructed neighboring dock facility. Secondary Criteria 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. Per the applicant, such a special condition exists as a result of a relatively high Top of Bank elevation and the associated large rip -rap shoreline that has affected the overall dock design. As a result of this condition the proposed access BDE-PL20170003371, Hale Dock Page 5 of 8 ver. FINAL, HEX 6/14/18 walkway portion of the dock needs to protrude further out into the waterway in order to decrease the access walkway's slope and reach adequate water depths. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. The applicant states that the proposed dock has been minimized from the original design to satisfy dock building guidelines and to be within the 25% of waterway width limitation. Staff concurs that the proposed design is the minimum necessary to provide adequate and safe access to and from the vessel while still allowing room for other recreational uses such as fishing and kayak/paddle board storage on the dock as depicted on the provided plans. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50% of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion not met. The proposed dock facility has been designed for the mooring of a single vessel measuring 34 -feet which is greater than 50% of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility is one of potentially 11 other single-family docking facilities allowed to be constructed along this shoreline. The proposed dock has been designed to satisfy setback requirements and is consistent with others on the subject waterway. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200 -feet of proposed dock facility. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) BDE-PL20170003371, Hale Dock Page 6 of 8 ver. FINAL, HEX 6/14/18 Criterion is not applicable. The proposed project is for a single-family residential boat dock facility. Section 5.03.06.E.11, Manatee Protection Plan, is not applicable for this boat dock proposal. Staff analysis indicates that the request meets five of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria. Therefore, under the LDC provisions, the installation of a new boat dock facility requires approval by the Collier County Hearing Examiner. The recommendation by staff is approval. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: For any boat dock extension petition acted upon by the Collier County Hearing Examiner, an aggrieved petitioner, or adversely affected property owner, may appeal such final action to the Board of County Commissioners. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Department Head within 30 days of the action by the Hearing Examiner. If approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that they must not proceed with construction during the 30 -day period. Any construction work completed ahead of the approval authorization shall be at their own risk. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for BDE-20170003371 on May 30, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve Petition BDE-20170003371 with the stipulation that the issuance of a certificate of completion for the dock facility shall not precede the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the dwelling (principal structure). Attachments: Attachment A — Sign Posting Information Attachment B — Back-up material, including plans and submerged resource survey BDE-PL20170003371, Hale Dock Page 7 of 8 ver. FINAL, HEX 6/14/18 PREPARED BY: JOffN A. KELLY, SENIOR PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: RAY(a- YMON BELLOWS, NTNG MANAGER 4DAE ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION BDE-PL20170003371, Hale Dock Page 8 of 8 ver. FINAL, HEX 6114118 KellyJohn From: John <johnkellyfl@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 5:16 PM To: KellyJohn Subject: Sign posting - BDE-PL20170003371 Attachments: IMG_0052.HEIC; IMG_0053.HEIC; IMG_0054.HEIC; IMG_0048.HEIC; IMG_0049.HEIC Signs posted at 6:0013M on Thursday, May 24, 2018. Sent from XFINITY Connect Mobile App Attachment A I:r,io llak regorsfs -SRI^PORI.{'! :li Ferr limit en a 21.Foor h .C.Qbe°r Berk raf I?r�rla �ttrio3, '� azar 1 nti 5irou ~ dor arr liresa pi'�srsser �fM1ereMcnef eF �" c tr�r[rnd ;*ryam�r lu u ay, i r•6dhlsion-aisod , " . kalleh .i[ 7exnship 19 1"'ribrd as f i.of !7, L-Donn. F'Iwida. 4oufM1, !h'- 5 ihhrfM � Ilxn¢r R _ . 25 F'x�l, Cwjl_ � DATEIunrf1.701n.r4:5Ut11 �` s ,, cher Uric r.�euy4. iina�. Mw.n 10 .7�Frs. Fl. .i.ea W CCNTACT. '°�"Kra,.~�i� � - �ncrr: IJ9.2i2.c714 jeM.Lrlh'a ogyineuny R.�1 _' s ` woi s HEARING PUBLIC F/ - - -� 'ice •.. 'RR�Q .. ~ � n �4 'ins. n t - ___ . .�_ - - _�- r -.. - , T_ . _ - .� T ��-'- �. �__ __.._� .� ^rte BDE APPLICATION PL20170003371 1672 VINLAND WAY NAPLES, FL PREPARED BY: TURRELL HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34104 B DE APPLICATION w/ Primary &Secondary Criteria colie'. County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION LDC Section 5.03.06 Ch. 3 B. of the Administrative Code THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one): ■❑ DOCK EXTENSION ❑ BOATHOUSE PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME to be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Headwaters Development, LLLP Address: P.O. Box 110062 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34108 Telephone: Cell: Fax: E -Mail Address: Name of Applicant/ Agent: Kevin Hale - Applicant / Jeff Rogers - Agent see attached Firm: Address: 1672 Vinland Way Telephone: E -Mail Address: City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34105 Cell: PROPERTY LOCATION Section/Township/Range: 35/ 4 25 Subdivision: Landings at Bears Paw Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 1672 Vinland Way Naples, FL 34105 Fax: Property I.D. Number: 54490010481 Unit: Lot: 17 Block: Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: RPUD BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 8/03/2017 Page 1 of 6 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): To construct a new single-family docking facility along the man-made portion of the Gordon River. The proposed dock is approximately 637 total square feet and approximately 547 of over water structure. There is one optional boat lift which will protrude approximately 44 -feet from the top of bank and approximately 30 -feet from the MHWL. We. are requesting a 10 -foot extension from the allowable 20 -feet measured from the mean high water line. SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 120 ft. Measurement from Q plat 1•❑ survey F-1 visual estimate 0 other (specify) Aerial 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 67 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 7.5&75 ft. Required: 7.5&7.5 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 44 ft. S. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 34 ft. 2. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: There are numerous other docking facilities on this waterway to the east and southwest of this property. All of which protrude approximately 30' to 50' out into the same waterway. 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 0.23 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? [] Yes Q No If yes, please provide copies. 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 6 Zoning Land Use N RPUD Landings at Bears Paw S A Golden Gate Canal E RPUD & RSF-4 Landings at Bears Paw & Residential Single -Family W RPUD & RSF-4 Landings at Bears Paw & Residential Single -Family DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): To construct a new single-family docking facility along the man-made portion of the Gordon River. The proposed dock is approximately 637 total square feet and approximately 547 of over water structure. There is one optional boat lift which will protrude approximately 44 -feet from the top of bank and approximately 30 -feet from the MHWL. We. are requesting a 10 -foot extension from the allowable 20 -feet measured from the mean high water line. SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 120 ft. Measurement from Q plat 1•❑ survey F-1 visual estimate 0 other (specify) Aerial 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 67 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 7.5&75 ft. Required: 7.5&7.5 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 44 ft. S. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 34 ft. 2. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: There are numerous other docking facilities on this waterway to the east and southwest of this property. All of which protrude approximately 30' to 50' out into the same waterway. 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 0.23 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? [] Yes Q No If yes, please provide copies. 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 6 CAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 6 r Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 1 must be demonstrated.) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (if applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) 9/28/2017 Page 4 of 6 CAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-5358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑■ Dock Extension ❑ Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code i ne ronowing auomittai Kequirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 ® ❑ Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Signed and Sealed Survey ❑ ❑ ❑ Chart of Site Waterway ❑ ❑ ❑ Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 1 ❑ ❑ facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 1 ® ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ® ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please be advised: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all 1 ❑ ❑ materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 9/28/2017 Page 5 of 6 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: FEE REQUIREMENTS: ❑ Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 G An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 fgna,uTeof Pe itioner or Agent 9/28/2017 Page 6 of 6 Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet Addressing: Annis Moxam LJ Graphics: Beth Yang ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ®Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet ElParks and Recreation: David Berra ElConservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Engineering: Brett Rosenblum FEE REQUIREMENTS: ❑ Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 G An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 fgna,uTeof Pe itioner or Agent 9/28/2017 Page 6 of 6 PRIMARY CRITERIA The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Response: The total waterfront length for this property is 67ft. The zoning and upland land use is single family residential unit which warrants no more than 2 slips per CC -LDC as well as the approved PUD. The current proposed dock design has 1 optional boat slip. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) Response: See attached survey/drawing illustrating the existing water depths. At 20 foot protrusion from the Top of Bank you have approximately 1.1' MLW and are still over the rip -rap. Therefore there is insufficient water depths to moor a vessel or provide safe access to the docking facility within the 20 -foot protrusion mark. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Response: The proposed docking facility will not have any adverse impacts on navigation as it will only protrude 30' from the MHWL into the waterway that is approximately 123' wide from MHWL to MHWL. The entire waterway is used for navigation as there are no navigational markers indicating the exact thread of navigation. The proposed docking facility provides adequate space for navigation through this waterway as well as provides sufficient space for a dock to be built across the waterway from the subject property and still provide adequate space for navigation. 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Response: The proposed docking facility protrudes approximately 30' from the MHWL into a waterway that is 123' wide from MHW to MHW. The proposed dock protrudes approximately 25% into the waterway and therefore as proposed the dock does meet this criteria. 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not inhere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Response: The proposed dock facility will provide 7.5' setbacks from both property/riparian lines. The approved PUD for the Landings at Bears Paw development only requires 7.5' setbacks for a docking facility that is parallel to the shoreline. The dock design and location has been designed to be located within the required setbacks, provide safe access with a vessel and not interfere with any future neighboring docking facilities that maybe constructed. SECONDARY CRITERIA Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Response: The proposed dock facility was primarily governed by the County guidelines and the approved PUD for Landings at Bear's Paw. The one special condition that has affected the overall proposed dock design was the relatively high Top of Bank elevation and the associated large rip -rap shoreline. Due to this condition the proposed access walkway portion of the dock needs to protrude further out into the waterway in order to decrease the access walkway's slope and reach adequate water depths. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Response: The proposed dock facility has been minimized from the original design in order to meet the County dock building guidelines as well as to be within the 25% width of waterway. The proposed design stili provides adequate and safe access to and from the vessel while still allowing room for other recreational use like fishing and kayak/paddle board storage on the dock. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Response: The proposed dock facility has been designed to only moor one vessel up to 34 -feet which is greater than 50% the subject property's linear waterfront footage. Therefore this criteria is not met. 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) Response: The proposed dock facility will be one of potentially 11 other single-family docking facilities allowed to be constructed along this shoreline. The proposed dock has been designed within the designated setback area as outlined in the approved PUD document for this development. The proposed docking facility design is consistent with others on this waterway and will not affect neighboring properties view of the waterway. 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.06 1 must be demonstrated.) Response: There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200' of the existing dock structure. 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) Response: The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee Protection Requirements. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP Disclosure Form Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2440 FAX: (239) 252.6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership 0 Le If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and rhP If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Created z�i/ Luy zu,r i Page 1 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collieraow.net Co er County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239} 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Cr e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership )4x.4- cul.? f 9. Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals nr Date subject property acquired _.. ❑ Leased: Term of lease „_ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Co....#er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www. coil iereov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: Anticipated closing date: _ S /Ira or AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, i attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. l understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 .2/ la Agent/Owner 1g ature Date I Ag cw I�nD' e• r �m' }e please C5 e /Ce)7ery!/ Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 LOCATION MAP 0 DRAWINGS I a STATE OF FLORIDA CITY COLLIER COUNTY SITE ADDRESS: <> 1672 VINLAND WAY NAPLES. FL 34108 TAMPA oFT. MYERS" KEY WEST ., NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURP AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION <> LATITUDE: N 26° 10'00.66" <> LONGITUDE: W81'46'53,77" SiJBJECT "'� b ! rA VICINITY MAP COUNTY AERIAL Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. OESIGNEI) J' H A 1_ E d a C K DRAWN BY RM, Marine & Environmental Consulting OREATEz o of -2a -+e 3 3584 Exchange Ave. Salle B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 LOCATION MAP JOB NO 0605.6 d SHEET NO.- 01 OF OT 5 Email:tana(ahurrellassociales.com Phone: (239) 643-01 66 Fax: (234)643fi632 SECTION -35 TOWNSHIP -495 RANO E- 25 E SITE ADDRESS: * 1672 VINLANO WAY NAPLES, FL 34108 PROPERTY LINE EXISTING --\ TOP OF BANK AND PROPERTY LIN RIP RAP V `\ EXISTING ADJACENT DOCK & LIFT v` x 0 3 X.2.7 x-3.2 APPROX�0' MHWO-44' >o�:�'x-3.8 x,,6 TOE OF RIP RAP J-� (NA V D '88) + ,x. I_ XAI x.3.8 -*X-5.8 APPROXx-1.0 - 6 x4A RIPARIAN MLW -1.54' X1 x.3.9 X4.2 x- 1 X-5.9 LINE (NAVD'88) ' X-1.2,. X-4.4 X -d.9 X-5. ' x0z x-3.8 x-8.1 Gj X4.8 X,/ x.4 1 `� AA X4.5 0 `��r 6 '- x4.6 x-8 x_6 2 � Cj 1 X-4.6 ` J' x-6 z RIPARIAN �� " X-6,4 LINE x X-5.2 x-6,4 1 ;J EXISTING X $ 6 ADJACENT x DOCK & LIFT X-6 d Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DRAWN R �RRWN 9Y ft 24 2 Marine &Environmental Consulting CftEATE� o,.�<.,a 0 4 3584 EXISTING CONDITIONS SREET Exchange Ave, Suite B. Naples, FL 34104.3732 SHEET NO 02 or OF 07 s Email, mna(,umcli-associatcs.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 n9 �_�F p,; �g E_«,,, ,m,M ,- m,r- SECTION -35 TOWNSHIP -49S RANGE -25E N .� 7UrtX >E a rn za 4a w SCALE 9)v xEEr `\ EXISTING ADJACENT DOCK & LIFT v` x 0 3 X.2.7 x-3.2 APPROX�0' MHWO-44' >o�:�'x-3.8 x,,6 TOE OF RIP RAP J-� (NA V D '88) + ,x. I_ XAI x.3.8 -*X-5.8 APPROXx-1.0 - 6 x4A RIPARIAN MLW -1.54' X1 x.3.9 X4.2 x- 1 X-5.9 LINE (NAVD'88) ' X-1.2,. X-4.4 X -d.9 X-5. ' x0z x-3.8 x-8.1 Gj X4.8 X,/ x.4 1 `� AA X4.5 0 `��r 6 '- x4.6 x-8 x_6 2 � Cj 1 X-4.6 ` J' x-6 z RIPARIAN �� " X-6,4 LINE x X-5.2 x-6,4 1 ;J EXISTING X $ 6 ADJACENT x DOCK & LIFT X-6 d Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DRAWN R �RRWN 9Y ft 24 2 Marine &Environmental Consulting CftEATE� o,.�<.,a 0 4 3584 EXISTING CONDITIONS SREET Exchange Ave, Suite B. Naples, FL 34104.3732 SHEET NO 02 or OF 07 s Email, mna(,umcli-associatcs.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 n9 �_�F p,; �g E_«,,, ,m,M ,- m,r- SECTION -35 TOWNSHIP -49S RANGE -25E EXISTING ADJACENT DOCK C '= SITE ADDRESS: 1672 VINLAND WAY n NAPLES. FL 34108 t � � PROPERTY LINE z EXISTING PROPOSED �J 5 TOP OF BANK L; -HAND RAIL - p AND RIP RAP �xZ z AA 05 �� � � TOE OF RIP RAP RIPARIAN LINE RIPARIAN SETBACK LINE / APPROX / MHW 0.44' ? N (NAVD '88) 12'X14' � X6`1 AP ROX OPTIONAL / MLW -1.54' k . ;may BOAT LIFT (NAVD '88) / zo 23 a? � KJ �LL � / SC7{L'E7N'FEE7 V y FIXED DOCK / / NOTES: EXISTING a THESE DRAWINGS ARE, FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. • ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW ADJACENT • DEPTHS SURVEY COURTESY OF Court Gregory Surveying,Inc. DOCK SURVEY DATED, 09-04.2017 • SHORELINE SURVEY COURTESY OF Agnoti, Barber, Bmndage, Inc. •• SJRVEY OATED: 1"9-2012 PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 30' / APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF). 6T RIPARIAN LINE - WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW(APPX)- 123'MHW TO MHW / 25% WIDTH OF PROPOSED OVER WATER STRUCTURE (SQ FT( 647 RIPARIAN SETBACK LINE • TIDALD TUMITOTALSTRUCTURE(SO FT} 677 / WATERWAY • TIDAL DATJM: t16C •• MMLWH(NAVOJ= 0.44' W [NAVDp Turrell Hall & Associates Inc. (^ DFSIGNED JR 7 H , L_� Y` K DRAWN BY RMJ 2 Marine & Environmental Consulting �J GREATEN 0124-18 13 JOB NO. 0805 B d 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732 PROPOSED DOCK WITH DIMENSIONS SHEET NO 03010, 5 Email:hma(fetumII•a55mWestom Phone; (234) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 64M632 SECTION -35 TOWNSHIP -495 RANGE -25E SI'Z'E ADDRESS: 1672 VINLAND WAY NAPLES, FL 34108 PROPERTY LINE EXISTINGTOP OF BANK AND RIP RAP X-2.7 TOE OF RIP RAP • • I RIPARIAN LINE J x-5.9 i x-4.2 f � 12'X14' �� RIPARIAN " OPTIONAL �9 x-5.7 SETBACK LINE BOAT LIFT ` x� FIXED DOCK V �.5 �/ ' NOTES: ESE ORAWNGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND - -4.8 x -$,q ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW DEPTHS SURVEY / COURTESY OF. Court Gregory Surveying, Inc. • SURVEY DATE 09-04-2017 RIPARIAN LINE • SHORELINE SURVEY COURTESY OF Agnoll, Bad*T, Brundage, Inc. , x -4.E .. SURVEY DATED 16-06-2612 ><-5.3 • PROTRUSION FROM MHWL 39, • APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF), 67' RIPARIAN 25% WIDTH OF • WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 129' MHW TO MHW x-5. PROPOSED OVER WATER STRUCTURE(SOFT) 647 SETBACK LIVE x-5.0 WATERWAY • PROPOSED TOTAL STRUCTURE (SO FT): 637 TIDALOAMLw(NA �. .. NAVDI- MHW (NAVO)- Turrell Hall & Associates Inc. X-59 °e5'GNE° JR ' H A E ��� ORAWN BY RMJ 2 - - Manne & Environmental Consulting CREATEff P1 -2S-16 3 3584ExchangeAve.suitee. \BPl.,FL34I04-3732 PROPOSED DOCK WITH DEPTHS !OB NO 0605F 4 SHEF7NO Dd�F07 5 Eg181I: turl3�';tuTrc�i-e550C181CS.C6t11 PI1071CI (239j G4}-0jfib Fax: (239)h43-hfi32 SECTION -35 TOWNSHIP -495 RANGE -25E _ r� '• �C��' �`a- 11 `_11u U �U fUU 20U r SITE ADDRESS: ► r , Oc3672 VINLAND WAY r� rle r SCR.C�7NE'r NAPLES, FL 34108 3 *► PNS 5 � N `o- a PROPERTY UNE O APPROX. r AGN MHWL MHWL A LO ti kv Yr THREAD ? * AVIGAT NOTES: THESE ORAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USI- ALL SEALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW ' -'• Y 7 DEPTHS SURVEY COURTESY OF Court Gregory Surveying, Inc. SURVEY DATED: 0946-2017 U] : • SHORELINE SURVEY COURTESY OP Agnoli, 8arber, Brundage, Ina y7 •• SURVEY DATE. 10-04-2012 } r PROTRUSION FROM MHWL. 30' APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF). 67• • a }� - ` - _, r WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APpx) 123' MHW TO MHW PA- PROPOSED VER WATER ,� - •• PROPOSED TOTAL STRUCTURE SO FT(SO FT) ) 547 7 _ TIDAL DATUM, -1.64• MLW(NAVD)= -0.44' MHW(NAVD1= Turrell Hall &Associates Inc.DESIGNED 1R 7 7 F-.� A L E E C ORAWN BY RMJ 2 _ Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED 01-74-58 JOB NO 0605.6 a 3584 Exchange Ave.SuileB. \aples,FL9)643-3732 EXISTING DOCKS IN CANAL sReErNo OBOF07 5 Email: tunalurrcll associatcs.com Phone: (239} b43 016h FaX: (239) f43 h632 SECTION -35 TOWNSHIP -498 RANGE- 25 E ' N yu}, SITE ADDRESS: 1672 VINLAND WAY r" NAPLES, FL 34108 S PROPERTY LINE a 6 3Q o Qo 2po 9N'Fk2'T A' Tu>ell, Hall &Associates, Inc. Marine &Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite 8. Vaples, FL 34164-3132 Email: tune[;hvrcll-essoci6tcs.com Phone: (239)643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 �� ■_ SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY DESIGNED JR cHEa eY na+ SHEET°NO o' © TYPICAL DIVE TRANSECT NOTES: a THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CON57RUCTION USE. ' ' w ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW 0. ! DEPTHS SURVEY COURTESY OF Court Gregory Surveying, Inc. SURVEY OATED, G9-04-7017 •• SHORELINE SURVEY COURTESY OF Agnah, Barber, Brundage, Inc. •• SURVEY DATED; 10-09-2012 Y ' • n # i PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 3p• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 67- WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPA) 123' MHW TO MHW PROPOSED TOTAL STRUCTURE ]SQ FT) 837 •• PROPOSED OVER WATER STRUCTURE (SO FT ($O FT); 537 TIDAL DATUM. -1.64' IVIMNAVD}= /044' •• MHW (NAVD}= ■_ SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY DESIGNED JR cHEa eY na+ SHEET°NO o' SECTION -35 TOWNSHIP -49S RANGE -25E a SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY HALE DOCK 1672 VINLAND WAY NAPLES, FL 34108 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY NOVEMBER 9, 2017 PREPARED BY: >--4"76bl%l TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 Exc"ANGE AVENUE, STE B NAPLES, FL 34104 HALE DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY NovEMaEa 9. 2017 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Hale proposed docking facility is located at 1672 Vinland Way, identified by Parcel Number 544900104841. The property is just south of Golden Gate Parkway, just west of the Gordon River Greenway property, bound to the east by a Bear's Paw utility buildings, and bound to the south by the Gordon River. The property is located in Section 35, Township 49 South, and Range 25 East. The upland portion of the property is a single- family residence. Turrell, Hall & Associates was contracted to provide environmental permitting services and one aspect is the associated Submerged Resource Survey (SRS). This survey will provide planning and review assistance to both owners and agency reviewers in regards to proposed project. The proposed project consists of constructing a new docking facility within the man-made waterway portion of the Gordon River. The SRS survey was conducted on November 9, 2017. Light northeast winds, mostly clear skies, and an outgoing tide resulted in visible access to the entire project area. Surface water conditions on this day were calm which also helped to provide fair environmental conditions for the survey. The water temperature was 76°F. Low tide occurred at H: A.M (-0.1') and high tide occurred at 6:11 P.M (2.5') on the date of the survey. 2.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of the Submerged Resource Survey was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within the limits of the proposed dock project or within 200 -feet of the project area. The survey provided onsite environmental information to help determine if the proposed project would impact any existing submerged resources and if so would assist in reconfiguring the proposed dock in order to minimize any impacts. If seagrasses are present within the project area it needs to be determined if the seagrass beds are small in size or if they are part of a large seagrass bed. The general scope of work performed at the site is summarized below. • TurrelI, Hall & Associates personnel conducted a site visit and I snorkeled these transects within the proposed project basin and verified the location of any submerged resources. • Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel identified submerged resources at the site, estimated the % of coverage, and delineated the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed. Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel delineated limits via a handheld GPS (Garmin Model 76csx). Page 1 of 4 HALE DOCK SUBMERGED REsouRcE SURVEY NOVEMBER 9, 2017 3.0 METHODOLOGY Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover the entire property shoreline for the proposed dock installation and the surrounding area expanding out 200 -feet from the project site. The components for this survey included: • Review of aerial photography of survey area • Establish survey transects lines overlaid onto aerials • Physically swim transects, GPS locate limits of submerged resources, and determine approximate percent of coverage e Document and photograph all findings The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transects spaced approximately 10 -feet apart within the proposed dock footprint as shown on the attached exhibit. The survey was expanded out 200 -feet from the proposed docking facility in order to verify no other resources were within the surrounding waterway. The neighboring properties have existing docks which helped to provide easily identifiable reference markers, such as dock piles which assisted in locating transects and keeping them consistent throughout most of the survey area. One biologist swam these transects using snorkel equipment within the surveyed area. The other individual assisted with compiling notes and documenting findings on aerials. Located submerged resources were photographed, the approximate percent of coverage was quantified, and the location was delineated on an aerial photo as well as confirmed via handheld GPS (Garmin Model 72H). The biologists used a half meter square quadrant further broken into sections by cordage to make coverage estimates easier. 4.0 RESULTS The substrate found within the surveyed area included two distinct classifications; silt sand with shell debris and just silt/ muck material scattered throughout. These substrates were found scattered throughout the entire surveyed area. There was also scattered shell and numerous rip -rap rocks scattered along the property shoreline. The shoreline consisted of a rip -rap shoreline which provides habitat for fish, crabs, and some barnacles, growing on and around the rocks. The majority of the survey area exhibited a silt/muck bottom that was devoid of any aquatic vegetation growth or any types of submerged resources. The lack of any submerged resources is most likely due to the overall water quality within the Gordon River as well as the water clarity not allowing much sunlight penetration. This was most evident in the deeper water depths. Page 2 of 4 HALE DOCK SUBMFRGFD RESOURCE SURVEY NOVEMBER 9, 2017 Various filamentous algae and macro algae were observed and documented growing along the bottom sediments throughout the survey area. Also observed were numerous fish species during the survey and a list of these species has been prepared and is provided below as Table 1. Table 1 — Observed Fish Species Common Name Scientific Name mangrove snapper Luoanus griseus sheepshead Archosargus probatocephalus striped mullet Mugil cephalus snook Centrompus undecimalis jack crevalle Caranx hippos 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The submerged resource survey was completed for the entire subject property shoreline and expanded out 200 -feet from the project area which yielded few findings. Scattered barnacles were observed growing on the existing dock piles. The only resources observed during the survey were fish species which included: Gray Snapper (Lu Janus griseus), Sheepshead (Archosargus probatocephalus), Stripped Mullet (Mugil cephalus), and a few Common Snooks (Centropomus undecimalis). Negative impacts to submerged resources are not expected with the proposed docking facility. Page 3 of 4 HALE DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY NOVEMBER 9, 2017 Bottom Sediment along shoreline, silthnuck subject Property shoreline Page 4 of 4 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Cotler county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.coliiergov.oet 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 2S2-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division rso at 239-252-5724 or submit in pen to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressina personnel prior to pre-aVpIkation meeting, please aifpw 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (lndicete type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist fru each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) R] BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Gamival/Circ us Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site !mprovernent Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) [] PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Pians & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal 8 Site Flll Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description maybe attached) Landings at BEAR'S PAW LOT 17 S 3 5 T49 R25 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 54.490010481 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, If already assigned) 1672 Vinland Way Naples, FL 34705 LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site In relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for un platted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) 1672 Vinland Way Dock PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projectalsites only) SDP or AR or PL # 20170003371 Rev. 6/912017 Page Z of 2 Carer Corsnty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierxov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium_ dgcprnents (if applicatlon; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: j] Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Jeft Rogers Phone: 239-643-0166 EnnaiuFax: Jeff@thanaples.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE: ONLY Folia Number 54490010481 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by Date: -9/27/2017 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 802037 Page 2 of 2 PRE -App MEETING Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.cofliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: BDE Date and Time: Wed 10/11/2017, 9:00 AM Assigned Planner: John Kelly Engineering Manager (for PPI_'s and FP's): Project Information Project Name: 1672 Vinland Way (BDE) PL #: 20170003371 Property ID #: 54490010481 Current Zoning: RPUD Project Address: 1672 VINLAND WAY City, NAPLES state: FL Applicant: Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Zip: 34105 Agent Name: Jeff Rogers Phone: (239) 643-0166 Agent/Firm Address: 3584 Exchange Ave city: Naples state: FL Property Owner: HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT LLLP 1672 VINLAND WAY, NAPLES, FL 34105 Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: Zip: 34104 V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: 13-66 vi, If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Coer Count COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www-colliereov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet P L# Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email C David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net SummerAraque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@coiliergov.net GMD Operations and _ l Claudine Auclair Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudineauclair@colliergov.net Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252.2361 stephenbaluch@colliergov.net Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymondbeilows@colliergov.net F Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 lauriebeard@coiliergov.net Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craigbrown@colliergov.net Managing Asst. County _ Heidi Ashton Cicko Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net John DeBlasis Zoning Services / Planning Tech 252-1050 johndeblasis@colliergov.net v Kay Deselem Zoning Services 252-2586 kaydeselem@colliergov.net f Dale Fey North Collier Fire 597-9227 dfey@northcollierfire.com L. Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 ericfey@coiliergov.net C Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothyfinn@colliergov.net Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@colliergov.net Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net Growth Management Deputy F_ James French Department Head 252-5717 jamesfrench@colliergov.net Structural/Residential Plan Michael Gibbons Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons@colliergov.net r Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 stormgewirtz@co1hergov.net Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net Shar Hingson Greater Naples Fire District 774-2800 shingson@gnfire.org John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes@colliergov.net ^ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net Garrett Louviere, P.E. Transportation Planning 252-2526 garrettlouviere@colliergov.net Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thornasmastroberto@colliergov.net Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthewmclean@coliiergov.net - Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michelemosca@coiiiergov.net Updated 7/19/2017 Page 1 4 of 5 CAV Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net Stefanie Nawrocki Development Review - Zoning 252-2313 stefanienawrocki@colliergov.net L Richard Orth 5tormwater Planning 252-5092 richardorth@colliergov.net Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@coiliergov.net Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@coiliergov.net C Fred Reischl, AICD Zoning Division 252-4211 fredreischl@coiliergov,net Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com C Daniel Roman, P.E. Engineering Utilities 252-2538 danielroman@colliergov.net Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net T Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net C Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net C Peter 5hawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 petershawinsky@colliergov.net Camden Smith Zoning Division Operations 252-1042 camdensmith@colliergov.net Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-5740 scottstone@colliergov.net C Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 marktempleton@colliergov.net F Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 jessicavelasco@coiliergov.net C Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwaish@colliergov.net David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net Christine Willoughby I Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christinewilloughby@colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email JQ s �y3-a L _ —�� �✓� les. ��— Updated 7/19/2017 Page 1 5 of 5 Applicont/Agent may also send site Collier C014nty plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. Growth Management Department Zoning Division PL20170003371 PRE -APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Camden Smith, John DeBlasiis STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre -app request Jeff Rogers / 239-643-0166 / Jeff@thanaples.com • Agent to list for PL# Jeff Rogers, Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) i List individually and by parcel • Confirm Purpose of Pre -App: (Rezone, etc.) BDE • Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): N/A Details about Project (choose type that applies): PUD or PUD -A— is this a phased development and if so what schedule is being proposed? Is the proposal for a specific Tract or addition of a Tract/Use? Variance — What are you seeking a variance of: zoning, primary use, etc.? Provide details. BDE — include any measurements of watercraft (boats), dock extensions measurements from shorelines etc. here and return with a site plan if such exists. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name Jeff Rogers Title Project Manager Email Jeff@thanaples.com Phone 239-643-0166 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K.\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zormg DMsw - 2$40 Not Horseshoe Drive • Napies Florda 34104.234-252.2400 - www cdiergw nel r Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: —S,r Dock Extension ❑ Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 6 ❑ Signed and Sealed Survey 91 ❑ Chart of Site Waterway Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 6 ❑ facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 1 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please advise; The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials 1 ❑ to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 8/03/2017 Page 6 of 7 CAer county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: FEE REQUIREMENTS: Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package, I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Ib �l Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date 1 8/03/2017 Page 7 of 7 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes lEAS E A c Ed C � rk L3S-1> ICUFri , n Em fd [JAwA s Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/19/2017 Page j 2 of 5 Residential Boat Dock Extension Checklist Submerged Resources Survey Checklist �} is there an overlay? ST overlay needs an ST permit (much of Isle of Capri & Keewaydin has an ST Overlay over the water) C2) Seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed dock facility shall be identified on an aerial photograph. (LDC 5.03.06 1) Provide a submerged resources survey from an Environmental Consultant done between April. and October. P530 0 All proposed dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least ten feet from any existing seagrass beds, or meet restrictions for continuous beds. (LDC 5.03.06 J.) P530 C4), Provide complete answers to Secondary Criteria 45 & 46. (Use Misc in CV) @Demonstrate how negative impacts to seagrass beds and other native shoreline vegetation and hard bottom communities have been minimized. (LDC 5.03.06 J A) P530 6. The dock shall be field adjusted to minimize impacts to mangroves. (LDC 5.03.06 1.2) Remove this checklist item — look at LDC? P530 7. Provide a clearing plan for removal of any vegetation related to the boat dock. This is simply an information exhibit being requested. (Use Misc in CV) 8. Are there any draft restrictions? Look at the MPP. (Use Misc in CV) Keewaydin: BDE not required for Keewaydin - Most always need an ST permit related to a Building Permit— water and land have ST Overlay Seagrass: Light penetration is needed to survive, usually in more shallow areas Submerged Resources Survey; - Read thoroughly - Check location description for street & waterway (if given) - Check to see if it was uploaded to CV - Indicate in CV "Comments box" if one was done & if it was uploaded to CV *****SEE SUGGESTED FORMAT OF SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY ON NEXT PAGE***** MULTI SLIP DOCKING FACILITY + Look at supplemental criteria in 5.05.42 o Fort of the Islands uses different Rating system — see MPI' • See 5.03.06 E I I and 5.05.02 for Manatee awareness requirements for multi -slip dockine facilities Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this LDC. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(2)(1 1) must be demonstrated). SUGGESTION FORMAT AND INFORMATION TO INCLUDE IN SUBMERGED RESOURCES SURVEY Location of survey — property address and folio# o The survey shall indicate any seagrass or seagrass beds located within 200 feet on any proposed dock facility (5.03.06.J). In order for this to be accomplished. any within 200 feet of the proposed dock (within the riparian lines of the property and adjacent to the property) shall be surveyed. r Who did the survey — which firm and their contact information including name, address, phone #, email What date was the survey conducted? Gtiidancefrom FWG is to do betiveep April and. October o Weather conditions, water temperature, low tide & high tide times Objective of Survey & Work done on the site o Was the site snorkeled? o What methodologies were used? o Was a GPS used? o Was an aerial photograph reviewed and used to establish survey transect lines? Results o What was found? Substrate and what kind? Seagrass, shell. oysters? o What was along the shoreline? Mangroves, seawall, etc? o Why does the consultant think no submergerd resources were found? o Other observations :- When seagrass is found, include all requirements of LDC section 5.03.06. J. Conclusions o Were any submerged resources found? If yes. what? o Are any impacts to submerged resources expected or proposed? Pictures (suggested angles) o Looking toward and away from the shoreline o The proposed location of the boat access o Observations in the water - Any oyster debris. shell, seagrass 5.03.06. J. (LDC section up to date as of 2016) Protection of seagrass beds. Seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed docks, dock facilities, or boathouses shall be protected through the following standards - 1 . tandards: 1. Where new docking facilities or boat dock extensions are proposed, the location and presence of seagrass or seagrass beds within 200 feet of any proposed dock facility shall be identified on an aerial photograph having a scale of 1 inch to 200 feet when available from the County, or a scale of 1 inch to 400 feet when such photographs are not available from the County The location of seagrass beds shall be verified by the County Manager or designee prior to issuance of any project approval or permit_ 2. All proposed dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least 10 feet from any existing seagrass beds, except where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the shore of the property and adjacent to the property, and to minimize negative impacts to seagrasses and other native shoreline, emergent and submerged vegetation, and hard bottom communities. 3. Where a continuous bed of seagrasses exists off the shore of the property and adjacent to the property, the applicant shall be allowed to build a dock across the seagrass beds, or a docking facility within 10 feet of seagrass beds. Such docking facilities shall comply with the following conditions, a. The dock shall be at a height of at least 3.5 feet NGVD. b. The terminal platform area of the dock shall not exceed 160 square feet. c. The access dock shall not exceed a width of 4 feet d- The access dock and terminal platform shall be sited to impact the smallest area of seagrass beds possible. Co ier Co--nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form_ must -be _signed _by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application.meetin-g. Please allow 3 days for processin . Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SOPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change -- Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) Landings at BEAR'S PAW LOT 17 S35 1'49 R25 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 54490010481 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 1672 Vinland Way Naples, FL 34105 • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) 1672 Vinland Way Dock PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # 20170003371 Rev. 6!912017 Page 1 of 2 COi.[ier C014 ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: 2 Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Jeff Rogers Phone: 239-643-0166 Email[Fax: Jeff@thanaples.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 5 4 4 9 0 010 4 81 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by Date: 9/27/2017 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 619/2017 Page 2 of 2 Receipt Number: Transaction Number: Date Paid: Amount Due: Payment Details: Amount Paid: Change / Overage: Contact: EEE DETAILS: Fee Description Pre -application Meeting Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Drive N. Naples, FL 34104 239-252.2400 RECEIPT OF PAYMENT 2017441032 2017-064508 10/11/2017 $500.00 Payment Method Amount Paid Check Number Check $500.00 14481 $500.00 $0.00 Turrell, Hall & Associates -Timothy Hall 3584 Exchange Ave Naples, FL 34104 Reference Number Original Fee PL20170DO3371 $500.00 Cashier Name: AlinaHarris Batch Number: 6761 Entered By: JohnDeBlasiis Amount GL Account Paid $500.00 131-138326-341276 STATE OF FLORIDA CITY COLLIER COUNTY Sffls ADDRESS: 1672 VINLAND WAY NAPLES, FL 341 D8 T. 1 v °FT.MYERS" KEY WEST v a' ...e-1:;4 NOTES: an THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURP AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION — LATITUDE: N 26' 10'00 66" — LONGITUDE' W 81'46'5177" VICINITY MAP COUNTY AERIAL Tovell, Nal! ir Associates, Ilic. A�lCy' & � V I NLA N ID WAY �r arincC e Fnvironmenlsl Consuhillg :?84 fizrhau a Arc Slide €3- Naples. I L 34104.3732 LOCATION MAP E.mml:rundaturrO.-'wmIC5zom Phanr,('_391(yi-11114, Fax: ('_391643-663'_ In SECTION -35 TOWNSHI4'-49S RANGE -25E �w• - i - 1 }• _ :. f PROPERTY - ._t,1. { /1 1 1! VICINITY MAP COUNTY AERIAL Tovell, Nal! ir Associates, Ilic. A�lCy' & � V I NLA N ID WAY �r arincC e Fnvironmenlsl Consuhillg :?84 fizrhau a Arc Slide €3- Naples. I L 34104.3732 LOCATION MAP E.mml:rundaturrO.-'wmIC5zom Phanr,('_391(yi-11114, Fax: ('_391643-663'_ In SECTION -35 TOWNSHI4'-49S RANGE -25E �w• y 3 SITE ADDRESS: 1fi7F ViNLAND WAY ,)A NAPLES. FL 34108 PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TOP OF BANK AND PROPERTY LIN RIP RAP,y, 4 A DPROX MHW 0,44. L (NAVP..'88) PPPROX r .MLW -1.54' 4wr (NAVD '88) � • N a rn zo 40 r 4, - EXISTING I ADJACENT DOCK & LIFT APPEARS TO BF BOTTOM OF RiP RAP SPORADIC RIP RAP FOUND AT THIS LINE RIPARIAN Yom.) LINE RIPARIAN LINE X-C - EXISTING ADJACENT '{ Ai DOCK & LIFT y °� NOTES: • THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE • ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW • DEPTHS SURVEY COURTESY OF Court Gnpory Suff&Y14, Inc. • SURVEY DATED: 094447 • • SHORELINE SURVEv COORTESY OF: Apnea, Barbar, D -011c. Inc • SURVEY DATED: 1"l-2012 • APPLICANT OWNED SHORE LINE IAPPX LF) 67' • WIDTH OF WATERWAY, LeHW TO MHW IAPPX) 12Y MHW TO MHW • TIDAL DATUM: •• MLW INAVDI- •• MNW INAVD)• •o,44' °ESIGNED. JR • Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. G & CD V I N LA N � WAY °°^wH D7, RRO Marine &Environmental Consulting trrtAFeD. ' a+r 3. - F..xchangc,aYc.SDiieg. Naplcs.FL34104-3732 EXISTING CONDITIONS S�E N9- 02OFob S. Email: iun3'pIurrdl ocia{cum Ph°m12391643.0106 Far (239)643-6672 SECTION -35 TOWNSHIP -49S RANGE -25E a i rr•, r• ,fI i I APPROX MHW 0.44' (NAVD'88) SAP ROXz (NAVD '88) 2 I r 91 FIXED DOCK 12'X14' OPTIONAL BOAT LIFT EXISTING ADJACENT / DOCK / RIPARIAN LINE RIPARIAN SETBACK LINE / 25% WIDTH OF Y WATERWAY EXISTING ADJACENT — +r DOCK / Q / APPEARS TO BE p — BOTTOM OF RIP RAP SPORADIC RIP RAP FOUND AT THIS LINE RIPARIAN LINE RIPARIAN !� SETBACK LINA / ■c N -Z S{s'fGE?N"FF� NOTES: ri1ESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON 15 REFERENCED To MLW DEPTHS SURVEY COURTESY OF. CvvA OrvpvrY ft—Ilnp, Inc. SURVEY DATED: 0544 2017 SHORELINE SURVEYCOURTESYOF' Agnvll, B.rt r, 8..d.gv, my •• SURVEY DATED tpap•2pt2 PROTRVSION FROM MHWL-, gyp• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE IAPPIN Lf) 67' MOTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TD MHW [AAPII t$]' MHW TO MHW PROPOSED OVER WATER STRUCTURE 150 FT, STi TIDAL DATUM •• hILLV INAVDI' •i.51' MITW;HAVDp •p.p' Turrell, Hall & Associates, - G& G V i N LA N C] WAY °RAY:NBY Rr.,, I Mannc & Em,ronmermal Consulting CREATED v�,n.n '"mfuhangeAve.S61CR.Nlapks.FL,aloa-313 PROPOSED DOCK WITH DIMENSIONS jus E°I.� o°�r"h Finalt.lunailnlRelhibnalucmn Pluple.I'-3 (W3.01f,6 rax i''3M)643III0,_..r,•,...,,._,,......,..,._,,.,. ......:.... .._... ,.,......_.- secrlory-as TownlsF+IP-nes FznnGE-zsE d SITE ADDRESS: 1672 VINLAND WAY NAPLES, FL 34108 PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TOP OF BANK $' y1 AND RIP RAP APPROX MHW 0.44' I/{' (NA\�Qa'88) I y✓; {XJ/ APPROX MLW-1.84r14 (NAVD 188) `I r k-4 F RIPARIAN LINE C — FIXED 13C)C :i PROPOSED HAND RAIL �tJ -0012i: �L E X1 2 -7 .SC7lCx` �x r�r � P APPEARS TO BE BOTTOM OF RIP RAP w=�--- SPORADIC RIP RAP FOUND AT THIS LIN RIPARIAN LINE v1 y 12X14, `— RIPARIAN OPTIONAL <.s.� SETBACK LINE BOAT LIFT RIPARIAN. 25°1. WiGTH SET8ACK TPMAlh >��Turrell, Hall ir Associates, Inc. G g� v I N LA N F—) WAY � Maline &Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. SuiieB. Naplcs.FL34104-3732 PROPOSED DOCK WITH DEPTHS EmaiLmna 'nlRrEl•ascociamL.rAm Phuru:J2191643-0166+ Fa0239)641-6632 NOTES: • THEBE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT FNTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. • ALL DATUMSHOWN HEREON F$ REFERENCED TO MtW • DEM$ SURVEY COURTESY OF Court GmCory SI syrnO. roe SURVEY DATED: ••• SHOiIELINE SURVEY COURTESYOF: Asnorl, SAr6er6H-0H70TT,8nmdi0a. Imt •• SURVEY OA7ED: N411A0,2 • PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 30' • APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APP%LFI 6i' WIDTH OF WATERWAY. MHW 70 LIHW(APP%), • PROPOSED OVERWATERSTRUCTURE (SC FT). i2 17S'MHW?DMNW • TJDAL DATUM; 534 MLW (NAVDp .. MHW (MAYO). •e�. ��®sera c�r�l;saae SECTION -35 TOWNSHIP -49S RANGE-ZSE p , - f-''��j�.id_ ',I. �; ! ��- , •. _ _ - _ ¢. - - �:'1 ^Z'.uv-... _ h � '�i�.n;'J �p - ��i .i� it . _ f Y ,,'%� .. 9 ;r+r 2470 SIrEADDRFSS:MOM [TT eti' Sc �N r °c 1672 VINLAND WAY r v _Fr` • ' t NAPLES, FL 34108 pr 00. _ o PROPERTY L E • � 1 �•r a � r_, ,{.{:�+i, . �• 0. G "MHWL MML f � � � ,.,ti•Ii r to �A CP Lr wKO l - 49 • � � 4T { THREAD 01 — NAVI(3A-rl0,j R S NOTES: THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND �J _ y,l `•� �.n ARE NOT 1NTENOEOFOR CONSTRUCTIONUSE • w - } < _--'1'_'rYi'� . IRRC - l AAL ♦'; 1_ '.! Rt 1' DATUM SHOWN HEREON AILW EC R rY S Fnq. Inc. res SURVEY DATED: • •1 09-04-2017 1c' w - � _ . � � •� SHORELINE SURVEY COURTESY OF; Agne1F, Ssr6ar• Brundage, Inc. f y _ SURVEY OA7E0: 1"0-2012h •+ �� I "�5', `�, ►� 1 f ; ' }, • ♦PROTRUSAPPLICANTED ION FROM MHWi: 29, Y `I.:., , WIDTH OFF WATERW YF MHW TO MHW IAPPx) Or 123 MH 76 MH V 'r • PROPOSED OVER WATER STRUCTURE RSO FTI. 538 TIDAL DATUM: ry�y -!' MVMWf [N0.WP •7.Sd• _ 1. Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. G V I N LA N WAY DRAWNEY in wtWNgr, w.0 2, Marine & Environmental Consulting F EMEO. 0116.17 Ma NOnr45.6 A 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples. FL 34104-3732 EXISTING DOCKS IN CANAL 5 E TND. o90Fo6 5: _ Finail:tugao;NnCll•u5oeialesmm Phone:(234)643-0166 Fax:(234)643.6632 sECT1pN-35 TOWNSHIP-q93 RANGE-25E x r 1 X15 �►;{.• - ._�:�=�-->�� p �.� APPROX. N C' MHW 0.44' (NAVD'88)� ' 0 ro IO • Sra rr 7N �EF7 wo TOE OF RIP RAP 15 AO �_ RIP N LINE �G N I 12'X14' APP OPTIONAL BOAT LIFT / �! D '88) a; FIXED DOC J RIPARIAN LINE 25% WIDTH OF @� ' WATERWAY Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Marine & Environmental Consulting K F L LA i\A D a C K Vq6� ,6 ��� n� �,. R. o COM s nuI �,6 ,A RL►gVFC 6,/6i, �. u�a 6}L S �,//A,6 3S&IP,�ctanSc Ave. Suitt R. Hlepka. FI. 341043712 Y41; hIN f�T01ilIt�Ogi�C061 MomM916434166 Fw(Dq)m3-w2 PROPOSED WITH DIMENSIONS Lm ,�,: �,�M MG is SECTION -96 TOWNSMIP-408 RgNC3E-26E AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORI7-4TION FOR PETITION NUMBERS($) I, ' if (pr�name), as V; ce res�e w �"�� r "c applicable) of �, L t (com any, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choos�one) wnerpticant�contract purchaser and than 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; Z All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the ap ved action. 5. Well authorize -`4.r jt s F, to act as ourimy representative in any matters regarding this p6tition including 1 through 2 above. Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. Pres, or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership • If the applicant is a trust, then they must Include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g.• individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the fa t;tated in it are true. /21, nature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER V o1U XS/ The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on �i L�CLy� 0 C� (date) by name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who ' personally known me or who has produced _ (type of identification) as identification STAMPISEAL Signatur of Notary Public AW,. ";:�,'' USACRONBRIDGE , iJ,Y C4MMlSSiON # GG 101036 g EXPIRE& September 22, 2021 w,r��i , R+r BarOod T►au Notary PuAri6 dflAalWs116B Q' 09-COA-O011 SA S REV 3/24114 SURVEY SCALE 1" = 40' P.( PAGE 1 OF 3 BOUNDARY INFORMATION FURNISHED BY CLIENT. k�L0 G. 5 0571 SEE ATTACHED PAGE 2 & 3 FIRC&W FOR DEPTHS AND LARGER SCALED DRAWING. ral FERC &A'N (4 �) (IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN) LOT 18 LOT 17 (CONTAINS 0.23 ACRES OF (P LAND MORE OR LESS) tr tya may= � LOT 16 q6K�r\r' 10' L.B.E. FIFiC W 6� FIRC STB` F-, _(4NiNE55 M.H.W. / ELEV. =0.44' / / x-78 SLOPE BREAK — �.1 / x:Z5 N MPRAP M.L.W — ELEV.=-154' X-2.7 X-29 SPORPDIC RVR NO AT T1158 UNE) 45.2' 32,4' RIPARIAN LINE 132.8' AOJACEM 17.0' �s pPpFASL TO BE BOTTOM OF NIPRAP `RIPARIAN UNE (UNE ONLY) 160'0,E O.R. BOOK 1Z1, PG. 159 Ile (LINE ONLY) / / 12T MHW LINE TO TRACT'G" �� MHWUNE (COMMON AREA & D.E.) / GOLDEN GATE MAIN CANAL M.H.W. X = DENOTED SPOT ELEVATION (NAVD 1988) ELEV. =0.41'1 / / NOTES: 1.THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF VINLAND WAY AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 56 PAGE 6 OF COLLIER COUNTY, BEING NORTH 641)50' 05" EAST. 2.IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ARE NOT A PART OF THIS SURVEY. 3.SA10 DESCRIBED LAND IS SUBJECT TO ALL SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, ZONING AND RIGHTS -OF- WAY OF RECORD. 4.DATE OF FIELD SURVEY SEPTEMBER 4, 2017. S.THIS SURVEY MAP IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES. &SUBSURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS WERE NOT EXAMINED AS A PART OF THIS SURVEY. NO STATEMENT IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD CONTAINERS, UTILITIES OR FACILITIES THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY. �. TELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON N.A.V,D. DATUM OF 1988, DESCRIPTION OF BM AS FOLLOWS: SPKND # 6004 IN NORTH 2 FT VALLEY GUTTER OPPOSITE SITE ELEV. = 6.88' NAVD'88) &SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN FLOOD ZONE N/A AS SHOWN ON FEMA MAP PANEL# ISLAND, BASE ELEVATION DETERMINED AT NIA ALL FEMA INFORMATION SHOWN NEEDS TO BE VERIFIED BY THE USER(S) OF THIS SURVEY, BEFORE ANY DESIGN AND/OR CONSTRUCTION. 9.N0 TITLE OPINION OR ABSTRACT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS BEEN PROVIDED. ALL INFORMATION HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY THE CLIENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THERE ARE DEEDS, EASEMENTS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS(RECORDEO OR UNRECORDED) WHICH MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY - NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN MADE BY THE SURVEYOR. IO.THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE EXISTING SHORELINE CONDITIONS AND DEPTHS IN RELATION TO THE PROPERTY LINES. PROPERTY LINES ARE SHOWN AS PLAT, REVISIONS LEGEND 0 = FOUND (') IRON ROO ( SURVEYOR ID #) (FIR) Q = SET 1/2" IRON ROD (PSM #8004)(SIRC) = SET 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT (PSM #6004)(SCM) ED = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (SURVEYOR ID #)(FCM) 1�= BENCHMARK (FOUND OR SET) RAN= RIGHT OF WAY(R.O.W.) 0 = FOUND NAIL OR PK NAIL AND DISC ( SURVEYOR ID #) (FPKN) Q =SET PK NAIL AND DISC (PSM #WO4) (SPKN&D) FD. - FOUND FN&TT- FOUND NAIL AND TIN TAB BM - BENCHMARK (M)= FIELD MEASUREMENT (C) - CALCULATED MEASUREMENT P.C.P. = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT (#) C.L.= CENTERLINE P.R.M. = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT (1) (PG) = PAGE (P) OR (D) - PLAT OR RECORDED(DEED) MEASUREMENT (PB) - PLAT BOOK PL EXT= PROPERTY LINE EXTENDED CMP =CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CATV -CABLE TV = FINISHED FLOOR U.T.S.= UNITED TELEPHONE RISER = WELL GONG - CONCRETE CB = CATCH BASIN OR INLET wy = WATERGATE VALVE R.C.P_ = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE �= SANITARY SEWER PROP = PROPERTY X = SPOT ELEVATION TOB = TOP OF BANK TOS =TOP OF SLOPE EOW = EDGE OF WATER SOS - BOTTOM OF BANK SOS - BOTTOM OF SLOPE EO = EDGE OF CSS=CONCRETE BLOCK & STUCCO VG = VALLEY GUTTER ELEC. = ELECTRIC TRANS = TRANSFORMER JAC = JACUZZI DE -DRAINAGE EASEMENT SWE = SIDEWALK EASEMENT LSE = LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT IE - IRRIG. EASEMENT PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT UE = UTILITY EASEMENT LMA(E)= LAKE MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT LME = LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT A.E.= ACCESS EASEMENT MAP OF CIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY OF LOT 17 OF LANDINGS AT BEAR'S PAW AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 56 PAGE(S) 5.6 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1672 VINLAND WAY CERTIFY TO: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES CERTIFICATION: I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES, NOTA CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR Digitally signed by Court H. Gregory DN: cn=Court H. Gregory, o --Court Gregory 5u eying Inc, ou, ematl gs6004PKomca5I-net, c=US Date: 2017.12.0515.9632 SIGNED -0500 COURT H. GREGORY PSM #6004 DATE 09/06/2017 DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 09-04-2017 PSM # 6004 LB # 7112 c.c.s. Court Gregory Surveying, in 761 Teton Court Naples, Florida 34104 (239)643-7845 office Date 09/06/2017 cgs6004@comcast-net Job # EN10197M (239)272-3707 Cell Fb ENI -6 Pg 5 LOT 16 SCALE III = 20' (IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN) LOT 17 (CONTAINS 0.23 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS) LOT 18 PAGE 20F3 00160qoff, 1pl `\yam 6.3 -0.3 -0.6 'k-2.1 / X-22 0.0 2.5 -4.2 -4.7 3'moi /11 5 -5.0 -6.0 0.1 X -2.6 -5.3 -7.3 ..� -0.0-- X -2.5 -5.1 -6.0 -0.2� � -5.4 -5-8 -6.6 -7.5 X -2.7 -5.9 -6,4 -7,3 X -2 9 -5.3 -7.6 - -4,0 -5.6 -6.4 -7.1 -6.3 -6.1 -6.8 -6.9 -7.5 -7.8 i -6.2 -7.4 -7.7 -6.5 -7.3 -7.7 -8.0 i �. -7.7 -6.7 -7.6 -8.1.." i -7.4 -7.3 -6.0 ' i i i X = DENOTED SPOT ELEVATION (NAVD 1988) i MAP OF FIC PURPOSE SURVEY OF LOT 17 OF LANDINGS AT BEAR'S PAW AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 56 PAGE(S) 5-6 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1672 VINLAND WAY CERTIFY TO: TU R RELL, HALL. & ASSOCIATES CERTIFICATION: I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES, NOTA CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES. Digitally signed 6y Court H. Gregory ON: cn-Court H. Gregory, o=Court Gregory Surveying Inc. ou. em i1=cgs6004.�,comcast.net, c=U5 Date- 2017.1 I.05 16:07:33 SIGNED -0500 COURT H. GREGORY PSM #6004 DATE 09/06/2017 DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 09-04-2017 PSM # 6004 LB # 7112 C.G.S. Court Gregory Surveying, 761 Teton Court Naples, Florida 34104 (239)643-7845 mice Date 09/06/2017 cgs6004@corncast.net Job # EN10197M (239)272-3707 cell Fb EN1-6 Pg 5 LOT 16 SCALE 110 = 20' a°`goo 1pl 1.2 ,'5C -o.6 Q5 -Q3 1.5 -1.0 PAGE 3OF3 -2.7 1� X -Q7 -3.2 . 1.4, -3.5 -4.5 ' r X -1.1 -3.8 -5.8 1.5 X -1.0-3.6 -4.4 1.3 _, 1-11-3.9 -4.2 -5.1 -5.9 X -1.2 4.4 -49 -5.7 X -1.4 -4.5 -3'$ -6.1 � -2.5 -4.1 -4.9 -5.5 i -6.0 -4.$ -5.4 -6.2 -4.6 -5.3 -5.9 -6.2 � -5.0 -5.8 -6.2 -6.4 %6. -6.2 -6.5, i i -5,2 -6.0 -6.6.pe -` -5.9 r i -5.8 -6,4 i i i i i i X = DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION ADJUSTED TO MLW (-1.54) i i M.H.W. ELEV. = 0.44'- Ile i i i MAP OF PECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY OF LOT 17 OF LANDINGS AT BEAR'S PAW AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 56 PAGE(S) 5-6 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA 1672 VINLAND WAY CERTIFY T0: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES CERTIFICATION: CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER W-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027. FLORIDA STATUTES. CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR )OM OF ENCUMBRANCES. Digitally signed ny Court H. Gregory DN:cn=Court H. Gregory, odourt Gregory Surveying •,"r " - Inc,ou, x; emaikcgs600"(omcast. net ,t=us Date: 2017.12.05 15:08:19 SIGNED -05'ao' COURT H. GREGORY PSM #6004 DATE 09/06/2017 DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 09-04-2017 PSM # 6004 LB#7112 C.G.S. Court Gregory Surveying, 761 Teton Court Naples, Florida 34104 (239)643-7645 office Date 09/06/2017 cgs6004@comcast.net .lob # ENI 0197M (239)272-3707 cell Fb ENI -6 Pg 5 MARK STRAIN EMAIL Jeff Rogers From: 5trairill <MarkStrain@colliergov.l Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 2:17 PM To: Jeff Rogers This is what found in an emelt sent by Matt to the applicant: The LDC definition of Mean high-water line (MHW) Identifies the intersection of the tidal plane of mean high water with shore as established by per the FL Coastal Mapping Act of 1974 Laws of Florida. Within the state law "mean high water" is the average height of the high waters over a 19 year period; therefore, the County recognizes the original MHW condition as one of the parameters for measuring the boat dock setback. For this particular project, this Is the most restrictive measurement. As long as the docks do not protrude 20 feet past that original controlling MHW line, then no BOE Is required. The approved PPL pians show this dimension as 20 feet from the controlling. MHW line and will suffice for the site review/approval. Please provide a copy of this email along with the building permit application resubmittal. Mark, 239.2 52.4446 Tinder Flerida Law, e-mail addresses are public records, If you da not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing CORPORATE/ LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INFORMATION 2417 FLORIDA PROFIT CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT DOCUMENT# P12000002682 Entity Name: HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT INC. Current Principal Place of Business: 2640 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SUITE 116 NAPLES, FL 34105 Current Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 110062 NAPLES, FL 34108 US FEI Number: 45-4215845 Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: NOVATT, JEFF ESQ. 1415 PANTHER LANE SUITE 327 NAPLES, FL 34109 US FILED Apr 30, 2017 Secretary of State CC8756535901 Certificate of Status Desired: No The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: JEFF NOVATT, ESQ. 04/3012017 Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date Officer/Director Detail Title DP5 Name KING, KEVIN Address P 0. BOX 110062 City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34108 Title VP Name PITTS, KIMBERLY Address P.O. BOX 110062 City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34108 Title DTVP Name HATCHER,PAUL Address P.O. BOX 110062 City -State -Zip- NAPLES FL 34108 I hereby candy that the information indicated on this report or supplementaf report is true and accurate and chat my efectronic signature shalt have the same legal effect as it made under oath; that t am an officer or director of the corporation or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 609, Ftonda Statutes; and that my name appears above. or on an attachment with alt otherfr'ke empowered. SIGNATURE: KEVIN KING DPS 04/30/2017 Electronic Signature of Signing Officer/Director Detail Date 2017 FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ANNUAL REPORT FILED DOCUMENT## A12000000132 Apr 30, 2017 Entity Name: HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Secretary Of State Current Principal Place of Business: CC8718356018 2640 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SUITE 116 NAPLES, FL 34105 Current Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 110062 NAPLES, FL 34108 FEI Number: NOT APPLICABLE Certificate of Status Desired: No Name and Address of Current Registered Agent: NOVATT, JEFF ESQ. 1415 PANTHER LANE SUITE 327 NAPLES, FL 34109 US The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. SIGNATURE: JEFF NOVATT, ESQ. 04/30/2017 Electronic Signature of Registered Agent Date General Partner Detail : Document# P12000002682 Name HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT INC. Address 2640 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY City -State -Zip: NAPLES FL 34105 I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurals and that my electronic signature shall have the same iegai effect as if made under oath; that 1 am a general partner of the limited partnership or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 620, Fionda Statutes; and that my name appears above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered. SIGNATURE: KEVIN KING GP 04/30/2017 Electronic Signature of Signing General Partner Detail Date DEVELOPER LETTER OF No OBJECTION r THE LANDINGS -- at BEAR'S PAW — March 22, 2018 Collier County Government Re: The Landings at Bears Paw -1672 Vinland Way (Lot 17) - Hale Residence - Boat Dock Extension Request To Whom it may concern; This letter is intended to notify Collier County that the Developers of the Landings at Bears Paw have reviewed and approve of the above referenced boat dock extension request (attached herewith). We trust that our approval will allow the County to proceed with your review of the proposed boat dock extension permit application. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 239-249-1953. Sincerely. 'C Kim Pitts Director Headwaters Development, inc, n5 Mailing Address: P.O- Box 110062, Naples, Florida 34106.0062 Civic Address: 2640 Golden Gate Parkway, Suite 116, Naples, Florida 34.105-3220 Phone; 239.293.5899 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION LETTER OF APPROVAL October 24, 2017 Collier County Government Re: The Landings at Bears Paw —Lot 17 - Hale Residence - Boat Dock Extension Request To Whom it may concern; This letter is intended to notify Collier County that the Landings at Bears Paw Homeowners Association, Inc. Board of Directors have reviewed and approved the above referenced boat dock extension request (attached herewith). We trust that our approval will allow the County to proceed with your review of the proposed boat dock extension permit application. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 239-249-1453. Sincerely. r- R Pitts Director Landings at Bear -s Paw Homeowner's Axsociation. Inc.