The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 09/25/2012 Item #17A 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to consider an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, for PUDZ-PL20110000406: Brynwood Center,by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from an Agricultural (A) zoning district with an "ST" overlay to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district for a project to be known as the Brynwood Center CPUD to allow construction of a maximum of 145,000 square feet of retail and office uses which include a maximum of 25,000 square feet of retail and a maximum of 60,000 square feet of medical office uses. Also permitted are hotel and motel uses at 20 units per acre and group housing (assisted living facility and independent living units) at a floor area ratio of 0.6. For each acre of group housing or hotel or motel use, 12,083 square feet of retail or office use shall be subtracted from the total amount of allowable commercial square footage. The project is located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 980 feet east of the intersection of Livingston Road and Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 13.65± acres; and by providing an effective date. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding this PUD rezone petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes 4nd regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The petitioner is requesting a rezone from the Rural Agricultural Zoning District with an ST Overlay to the Commercial Planned Unit Development District (CPUD) Zoning District to allow development of a maximum of 145,000 square feet of retail and office use which include a maximum of 25,000 square feet of retail and a maximum of 60,000 square feet of medical office uses. Also permitted are hotel and motel uses at 20 units per acre and group housing (assisted living facility and independent living units) at a (Floor Area Ratio) FAR of 0.6. For each acre of group housing or hotel or motel use, 12,083 square feet of retail or office use Shall be subtracted from the total amount of allowable commercial square footage. The Master Plan shows one access point onto Pine Ridge Road via Good Earth Drive, and vehicular/bicycle/pedestrian interconnections to the east to Pine Ridge Center'West PUD and to the East to the Baldridge PUD. The Master Plan shows the preserve locations, a water management lake and potential building locations and parking areas. The petitioner is seeking approval of seven deviations for this petition. These are discussed in the CCPC staff report. PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 1 of 10 Revised: 8/14/12 BCC Hearing Date September 25,2012 Packet Page-3101- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict as depicted in the Future Land Use Element [FLUE] and on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan [GMP]. The petition is reliant upon the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, a text-based provision in the FLUE. Office and In-fill Commercial Subdistrict: The intent of this Subdistrict is to allow low intensity office commercial or infill commercial development on small parcels within the Urban Mixed Use District located along arterial and collector roadways where residential development, as allowed by the Density Rating System, may not be compatible or appropriate. Lower intensity office commercial development attracts low traffic volumes on the abutting roadway(s) and is generally compatible with nearby residential and commercial development. The criteria listed below must be met for any project utilizing this Subdistrict. For purposes of this Subdistrict, "abuts" and "abutting" excludes intervening public street, easement (other than utilities) or right- of-way, except for an intervening local street; and "commercial" refers to C-1 through C-5 zoning districts and commercial components of PUDs. a. The subject site is in the Urban-Mixed Use District. [It is.] b. The subject site abuts a road classified as an arterial or collector on the Collier County Functional Class Map, as adopted in the Transportation Element. [Pine Ridge Road is classified as an arterial.] c. A rezone to commercial zoning is requested for the subject property in its entirety, up to a maximum of 12 acres. For a property greater than 12 acres in size, the balance of the property in excess of 12 acres is limited to an environmental conservation easement or open space. Under this provision, "open space" shall not include water management facilities unless said facilities are incorporated into a conservation or preservation area for the purpose of enhancement of the conservation or preservation area. [The total site is 13.65 acres; 3.1 acres are preserve yielding the "developable" portion of the site at less than 12 acres (10.55 acres).] d. The site abuts commercial zoning: PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 2 of 10 Revised: 8/14/12 BCC Hearing Date September 25,2012 Packet Page -3102- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. (i) On one side and that abutting commercial site is not within an infill Subdistrict in the Urban Mixed Use District or the Urban Commercial District; or, (ii) On both sides. [Commercial zoning abuts the east boundary — Pine Ridge Center West PUD, and about one-half of the west boundary—Baldridge PUD.] e. The abutting commercial zoning may be in the unincorporated portion of Collier County or in a neighboring jurisdiction. [OK.] f. The depth of the subject property in its entirety, or up to 12 acres for parcels greater than 12 acres in size, for which commercial zoning is being requested, does not exceed the depth of the commercially zoned area on the abutting parcel(s). Where the subject site abuts commercial zoning on both sides, and the depth of the commercially zoned area is not the same on both abutting parcels, the Board of County Commissioners shall have discretion in determining how to interpret the depth of the commercially zoned area which cannot be exceeded, but in no case shall the depth exceed that on the abutting property with the greatest depth of commercial area. This discretion shall be applied on a case-by-case basis. [Depth of subject site does not exceed depth of adjacent commercial properties.] g. Project uses are limited to office or low intensity commercial uses if the subject property abuts commercial zoning on one side only. For property abutting commercial zoning on both sides, the project uses may include those of the highest intensity abutting commercial zoning district. [Proposed uses are of comparable intensity as those in the two adjacent PUDs.] h. The subject property in its entirety was not created to take advantage of this provision, evidenced by its creation prior to the adoption of this provision in the Growth Management Plan on October 28, 1997. [Criterion met.] i. For those sites that have existing commercial zoning abutting one side only: (i) commercial zoning used pursuant to this Subdistrict shall only be applied one time and shall not be expanded, except for aggregation of additional properties so long as all other criteria under this Subdistrict are met; and, (ii) uses shall be limited so as to serve as a transitional use between the commercial zoning on one side and non-commercial zoning on the other side. [N/A] j. For those sites that have existing commercial zoning abutting both sides, commercial zoning used pursuant to this Subdistrict shall only be applied one time and shall not be expanded, except for aggregation of additional properties so long as all other criteria under this Subdistrict are met. [OK.] k. Lands zoned for support medical uses pursuant to the "1/4 mile support medical uses" provision in the Urban designation shall not be deemed "commercial zoning" for purposes of this Subdistrict. [N/A] 1. Land adjacent to areas zoned C-1/T on the zoning atlas maps, or other commercial zoning obtained via the former Commercial Under Criteria provision in the FLUE, shall not be eligible for a rezone under the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, except through aggregation as provided in Paragraphs i. and j. above. [N/A] m. For purposes of this Subdistrict, property abutting land zoned Industrial or Industrial PUD, or abutting lands zoned for Business Park uses pursuant to the Business Park Subdistrict, or abutting lands zoned for Research and Technology Park uses pursuant to the Research and Technology Park Subdistrict, shall also qualify for commercial zoning so long as all other criteria under the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict are met. [N/A] n. At time of development, the project will be served by central public water and sewer. [County central water and sewer service is available to the site.] PUDZ-PL2011-0000406,Brynwood Center Page 3 of 10 Revised: 8/14/12 BCC Hearing Date September 25,2012 Packet Page-3103- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. o. The project will be compatible with existing land uses and permitted future land uses on surrounding properties. [Comprehensive Planning staff defers to Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety.] p. The maximum acreage eligible to be utilized for the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict within the Urban Mixed Use District is 250 acres. [This threshold has not been reached.] In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [Exhibit C, the PUD Master Plan, depicts direct access to Pine Ridge Road, an arterial road per the Transportation Element.] doot Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [No street system for the project is proposed. Nonetheless, Exhibit C, the PUD Master Plan, depicts a single access to Pine Ridge Road; by default, access to individual parcels would be internal — or via interconnection with commercial properties to the east and west.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. [No street system for the project is proposed. Exhibit C, the PUD Master Plan, depicts interconnection to the east (Pine Ridge Center CPUD) and west (Baldridge PUD). A preserve area/buffer is located along the entire southern boundary of the site, and the property to the south is a built-out residential development.] Policy 7.4 The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [For the most part, this policy is not applicable since this is not a residential project. The required open space is depicted on Exhibit C, the PUD Master Plan.] Based upon the above analysis, the proposed PUD may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Ask PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 4 of 10 Revised: 8/14/12 BCC Hearing Date September 25,2012 Packet Page -3104- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 year planning period. Therefore, the subject application can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan(GMP). Pine Ridge Road Impacts: The first concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 67.2, Pine Ridge Road between Livingston Road and I-75. The project generates 278 p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips, which represents a significant impact of 7.45% by the project. This segment of Pine Ridge Road currently has a remaining capacity of 1,245 trips, and is currently at LOS "D" as reflected by the 2011 AUIR. The next concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 67.1, Pine Ridge Road between Airport Road and Livingston Road. The project generates 149 p.m. peak hour, off-peak direction trips, which represents a significant impact of 3.99% by the project. However, these trips are generated in the off-peak direction, so they are not evaluated as a consistency requirement. In the peak direction, this segment of Pine Ridge Road currently has a remaining capacity of 1,057 trips, and is currently at LOS "D" as reflected by the 2011 AUIR. An additional concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 68.0, Pine Ridge Road between I-75 and Logan Boulevard. The project generates 102 p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips, which represents a significant impact of 2.70% by the project. This segment of Pine Ridge Road currently has a remaining capacity of 1,677 trips, and is currently at LOS "C" as reflected by the 2011 AUIR. All three concurrency segments listed above are within the East Central (Transportation Concurrency Management Areas) TCMA. However, the applicant does not propose to exempt this project from concurrency requirements, and accordingly, there are no TCMA requirements applied. No subsequent links beyond these segments of Pine Ridge are significantly impacted by this project. This analysis includes evaluation of both links 48.0 and 49.0, Livingston Road from Vanderbilt Beach to Pine Ridge, and Pine Ridge to Golden Gate Parkway (respectively); neither of which is significantly impacted. Note: In accordance with Collier County Planning Commission guidance, the developer has proposed a trip generation cap of 565 unadjusted,two-way, PM Peak hour trips. GMP Conclusion: Staff recommends that the petition be found consistent with the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP. For additional details, please refer to the Collier County Planning Commission staff report. PUDZ-PL2011-0000406,Brynwood Center Page 5 of 10 Revised: 8/14/12 BCC Hearing Date September 25,2012 Packet Page -3105- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition on August 2, 2012. By a unanimous vote (8 to 0) [Commissioner Brougham absent)recommended forwarding this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval subject to the following changes to the PUD document: 1) In Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, Replace the asterisk notations with numerical footnotes; and 2) In Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, Use #34 (Eating Places) — Add a limitation for this use to prohibit the use within 400 feet of the south property line except as an accessory use to a hotel/motel, and add the prohibit of outdoor music, television or open windows other than for pass thru food service; and 3) In Exhibit B.1, Development Standards for CPUD District, Revise Note ** to remove the words, "uses such as;"and 4) In Exhibit B.1, Development Standards for CPUD District, Remove Note **** which states, "Measured from the Preserve Tract, structural buffers are permitted within the setback area. See also the CPUD Master Plan (Exhibit C-1);" and 5) In Exhibit B.IV.B, in the last sentence, change This use is to "These uses are;" and 6) In Exhibit B.V.D, add "and their guests;"and 7) In Exhibit B.VI.A.2, revise 10,622 square feet to 12,083 square feet, add the word "gross"between the words "each" and"acre;"and 8) In Exhibit B.VI, add the requirement that the conversion calculations must include common and accessory areas, such as open space and water management areas; and 9) In Exhibit C-1A, remove Deviation #1, and add the word "future" between the words "the"and"developed;"and 10)In Exhibit C-1B, revise the conversion information consistent with what is required in #7 and#8 above; and 11)In Exhibit C-1 B, augment Note #3 to indicate that any changes to building and roadway locations must be done in compliance with the LDC allowances for PUD substantial, insubstantial and minor change criteria; and 12)In Exhibit C-2, add the requirement that the south side of the wall along the southern property line be painted brown, consistent with the commitment made at the NIM; and PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 6 of 10 Revised: 8/14/12 BCC Hearing Date September 25,2012 Packet Page -3106- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 13)In Exhibit D, add limitations to Deviation #1, consistent with the 12 acre GMP infill criteria of the GMP; and 14)In Exhibit D, Deviation #3, add the word "future" between the words "the" and "developed;" and 15)In Exhibit F, 1.A,Revise the text to state: The development within this project shall be limited to 577 unadjusted two-way PM peak hour trips (or 504 adjusted two-way, PM peak hour trips); corresponding to the highest trip generation scenario of those proposed in the updated traffic study information dated October 13, 2011. . . .; and 16)In Exhibit F, add a wall commitment section commensurate with item#12 above. These revisions have been incorporated into the PUD document that is included in the draft ordinance. No correspondence in opposition to this petition has been submitted for the current proposal; no one spoke at the CCPC hearing voicing opposition to the project and the CCPC vote was unanimous. Staff withdrew its opposition to Deviation #3 citing the additional evidence placed upon the record at the CCPC hearing. Therefore, this petition can be placed on the Summary Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site specific rezone from a Rural Agricultural Zoning District with an ST Overlay to the Commercial Planned Unit Development District (CPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the Brynwood Center CPUD. This rezone will remove the ST Overlay. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the BCC, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for CPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 7 of 10 Revised: 8/14/12 BCC Hearing Date September 25,2012 Packet Page-3107- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed CPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with CPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications Aow are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed CPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested CPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak oft PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 8 of 10 Revised: 8/14/12 BCC Hearing Date September 25,2012 Packet Page -3108- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a"core"question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed CPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art. II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the CPUD rezone request that the BCC shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney's Office. This item has been reviewed for legal sufficiency and is legally sufficient for Board action. An affirmative vote of four is necessary for Board approval. (HFAC) PUDZ-PL2011-0000406,Brynwood Center Page 9 of 10 Revised: 8/14/12 BCC Hearing Date September 25,2012 Packet Page -3109- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendations of the CCPC and further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request subject to the attached PUD Ordinance that includes both the staff recommendation and the CCPC recommendation. PREPARED BY: Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner, Planning & Zoning Department, Growth Management Division, Planning and Regulation Attachments: 1) Staff Report 2) Back-up information 3) Ordinance Almtv PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 10 of 10 Revised: 8/14/12 BCC Hearing Date September 25,2012 Packet Page-3110- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.A. Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. PUDZ-PL20110000406: Brynwood Center--An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from an Agricultural (A) zoning district with an "ST" overlay to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) zoning district for a project to be known as the Brynwood Center CPUD to allow construction of a maximum of 145,000 square feet of retail and office uses which include a maximum of 25,000 square feet of retail and a maximum of 60,000 square feet of medical office uses. Also permitted are hotel and motel uses at 20 units per acre and group housing (assisted living facility and independent living units) at a floor area ratio of 0.6. For each acre of group housing or hotel or motel use, 12,083 square feet of retail or office use shall be subtracted from the total amount of allowable commercial square footage. The project is located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately 980 feet east of the intersection of Livingston Road and Pine Ridge Road in Section 18,Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 13.65± acres; and by providing an effective date. Meeting Date: 9/25/2012 Prepared By Name: DeselemKay Title: Planner,Principal,Engineering&Environmental Ser 8/14/2012 4:49:08 PM Approved By Name: BellowsRay Title: Manager-Planning,Comprehensive Planning Date: 8/16/2012 5:38:33 PM Name: BosiMichael Title: Manager-Planning,Comprehensive Planning Packet Page-3111- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Date: 8/20/2012 1:27:22 PM Name: PuigJudy Title: Operations Analyst,GMD P&R Date: 8/27/2012 1:09:16 PM Name: MarcellaJeanne Title: Executive Secretary,Transportation Planning Date: 8/28/2012 7:58:56 AM Name: AshtonHeidi Title: Section Chief/Land Use-Transportation,County Attor Date: 8/31/2012 2:24:22 PM Name: FinnEd Title: Senior Budget Analyst, OMB Date: 9/4/2012 3:01:09 PM Name: KlatzkowJeff Title: County Attorney Date: 9/14/2012 9:50:20 AM Name: OchsLeo Title: County Manager Date: 9/15/2012 2:47:17 PM Agek- Packet Page-3112- i I 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. AGENDA ITEM 9-B Co er County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING SERVICES--LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION--PLANNING &REGULATION HEARING DATE: AUGUST 2, 2012 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20110000406: BRYNWOOD CENTER PROPERTY OWNER&APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner/Applicant: Agents: First Community Bank of SW FL Robert L. Duane, AICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. 1565 Red Cedar Drive Hole Montes, Inc. Coleman, Yovanovich&Koester PA Fort Myers, FL 33907 950 Encore Way Northern Trust Bank Building Naples, FL 34110 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an application for a rezone from the Rural Agricultural Zoning District with an ST Overlay to the Commercial Planned Unit Development District (CPUD) Zoning District to allow development of a maximum of 145,000 square feet of retail and office uses which include a maximum of 25,000 square feet of retail and a maximum of 60,000 square feet of medical office uses. Also permitted are hotel and motel uses at 20 units per acre and group housing (assisted living facility and independent living units) at an FAR of 0.6. For each acre of group housing or hotel or motel use, 10,626 square feet of retail or office use shall be subtracted from the total amount of allowable commercial square footage. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of 13.65± acres, is located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road (CR 896), approximately 980 feet east of the intersection of Livingston Road(County Road 881) and Pine Ridge Road, in Section 18, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) Packet Page-3113- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting a rezone from the Rural Agricultural zoning district to the CPUD zoning district to allow development of a maximum of 145,000 square feet of retail and office uses which include a maximum of 25,000 square feet of retail and a maximum of 60,000 square feet of medical office uses. The petitioner also requests hotel and motel uses at 20 units per acre and group housing (assisted living facility and independent living units) at a FAR of 0.6. The petitioner has offered a limitation for each acre of group housing or hotel or motel use, 10,626 square feet of retail or office use shall be subtracted from the total amount of allowable commercial square footage. The Master Plan shows one access point onto Pine Ridge Road via Good Earth Drive, and vehicular/bicycle/pedestrian interconnections to the east to Pine Ridge Center West PUD and to the East to the Baldridge PUD. The Master Plan shows the preserve locations, a water management lake and potential building locations and parking areas. The proposed seven deviations are also shown on the Master Plan. These are discussed later in this report. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Pine Ridge Road, then the partially developed 16± acre Cambridge Square PUD, approved for commercial uses in Ordinance#06-01 East: The partially developed 8.87± acre Pine Ridge Center West PUD, approved for commercial uses in Ordinance#01-09,then Kraft Road South: The developed Brynwood Preserve 29± acre subdivision with a zoning designation of PUD, Ordinance#2000-073 that was approved at a density of 5.47 dwelling units per acre West: North Naples Fire and Rescue station, with a zoning designation of Public (P) with a Special Treatment (ST) overlay, and the Marquesa Shopping Center, with a zoning designation of PUD (Baldridge PUD) Ordinances#07-33 and#02-55),then Livingston Road Packet Page-3114- i I 111111MINE mo--- - BOO AACREE CApgE 7C pRDL , 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 13 I ��s J 1_ 4 1R 1 £N.,,i.> ?, m' ;:r. giA m w Vw � Is . s 2 l° Ni - -4 1 ej 74,. 6 y m gWPORT-PUWNG ROAD LLON�r -- AIRPORT-PUWNG ROAD • ' ° U F f/ D , Lo2 '$v gi c DPir , F ts2 ¢ a�g o�R.133 34 0,2IN4 T„ "g ' o D _£ —1— 1"N gyp '' g Q 9 ■ v R VDT NOISONIA=^ LIVINGBTON ftOAO —Y i=. b Z NAPLEWOW y n — c V � U �j " . ' INTERSTATE-75 Q D .=f s m � a, P "I N yN : D m _ 4N `g SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD T "73 al ,1 iA A c 0 Q -�iq,7, LOGAN BOULEVARD - 5 c,1 BOULEVARD CS';-°--> �� sb �N z a S E>S a =_ ;R• n p in Z " C Q Nor{ BCAtE N r LIVINGSTON ROAD N .�.. ...m.. :tee- _. ,...-,._..N.,,.�,..........�..,. „Oo .! O TRACT C r 9 ... \ 3 0 m l 1- €1 > 9 r...\ rn m/0 " t - z A Y O g m -< U A • m NON-5T o o,°° _A ' Aug -7 ST vI - r N 0 Y A H m e Zm I 1 " Z • Z y i N _ w • ` I Z :RYNWO OD WAY -! . I ST y j J r N w 8 o-T .N "v- v v m r v" g m N 3- I � R G x, i 5 D 4. CONSERVATOR / AREA P-I(B E.) GOOD EARTH DR $N9 $T { .S CO EA ° t•+z m .. / D n z 11�o I I A ° / 2 � 0 /pAt / t u® / T x _ J J i o '� mm m ° L r N o sIA _ � z gmAC 6 7 Y a a "S o —____— o m ; m i . r- —,,--:::------!d n _ rn 3 Q "1'. - 11 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. PINE FID(iE ROAD ■ — - -- 1 ill - 1r 1 Ili I _____T7___:._.7___________________________eo 1 ' 1 :_ _ _I— 1--- o TIM ,`.; m9 ' � ' foam A°Z v / X 4 Om .-,„ m1,� 1- NI , co - '5,1?. 2 m oy °z W -1 �1 a q� z o i °- °ZI i2z m T , �om Z JD ` �. op, ° �.`,� c) m 9 mm 01 >Dgo 8 _< ' i5'gi' 2 3 -a ,. c y c A ��m I m?z u SZ sm G)p r ,,, m x g:a1 FlgN `g ` R z m N z z> I A ,228 P z. cc, O yyS ° .aoo « � aS I ZNW 0 , ..:� �a6 p $i�I W o - f \ rOZ vCml l 1 - - ^ 2 m9� ° Z rrl 70 � j ° F 0 11 I'aa « j I I i m'�hg R in" R d° o$ m s H=g€Hg 1 >5 54 -, m a ` gi II s'= � m m .1, I w$m ,n S•••'"n � g,c x 1° S `ooNa ° z X z ° 30 98 Eo F _ - i i «, ` I / I ^ ` F s2 po• — I 7s 5,� , / , ! .,'� Quo°m of ~g o 11111411 O ; i 0065 g g <� ? °ai F trs 44 � I I i ft •� 8oz� � I •t • z g o o i * to x 1 " i .I <mog, x m ,,o� ' I — _ � I n •e'oo i------__ ,, amp ..,„.0 O ', ;® 0 "�9 \ z a- I , m'•en �soo I >g 7 \\\ I j _�A 11 pi $N .,1 yr xi •`A� ` g te. m ,g m"pO� p ° 2g : :I ` a r a uNiyoRo p. m > r ` > viamz fp ,o n 1:•!,,'g m I aoo_�o 'S Nmm m. i m c O waS \ F nmmN j 1 . zZ- G z m° . I ym°°, .i rn aim k L a N 1 y z I - ;p C m w;'d : ` IV w NNW' "ER!' 1 1, -1— a ' m > `°n z > 1 4. ¢ A D ,3Ai{ a�o� c� _ I Ili N �izw °� o z2-0'a ° , I o > z ,, c -q f.i u {I•S _ W> : -� VJ \ m '^v r m5 . 001 i S gr 's ..A2 c z °vm I a m2 ° aa1 I , w Q g ` `\ \_ti \mow \r\ \ \ ►r► \lifig ?z z" i i T � . . •� z-_ _ HOSPICE ^' >• ` �pSa S vES«_` _-Packet Page-3116- RESIDENTIAL PRESERVE Pl•• OF NAPLES PB 38,PG 55 +c....-+.....- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 19 6 w 4 o U) M 0 z K i> g co 4 0 O`L �, V) Z_i K G)V) z am nom 70 c) m A Z m 73 f --- O D oK ot 00 C U > -D DD 73 C-) Z> Zm m C Z a A Z7 ' Iii > Z m D 7J m`U Ail -< - 1 S Q — -�i >om Z m 0 • Z S° o z x " 1 -a g -1 < m 0 mo9 X n( m o '--- .K n- !n C X o n Vn O o n I -0 m-i mC m NG) D 1-11 Tl D Cr) c o Z y I m - <E Z I l r r D i z N ni ZU) U) Y m n 1 -1 U) Al-I <0 {1� n o 0 cc (n I R 'x rn n �mO mW R —i m m rn _ ()I m r r n . !� mT)r mZ �Ss3? 0 <r >m Km(n Z m01 -10 DAr, O Og ZPD z— m0 ooao m m m O it to p Gl N -'Z WA < 73 r SST) O �O'�DZ� D'2G) SWO022:O 4 Q a , O p m^ �z m Q C m m �=0 D=0 OC D OZ�r m� - m 0 Rm r W D'O'LT r <C G) >m(n<G m A-)D m m C (nr <OCZK D C rCWC OmO p'7 171 Z_ moA Z 0 -u) .. Or �(� � ZC m!'.iW" m —I -1O-10On� o Z moo ncnDDZ• -1<j 0WOzcn{DOO O > DOZO DSO c,.,.i L7 mDr mom O� �_ �rWiz0-0 rW 3 rr^ �cn�5 WI) - 0 -o W D mnWD�r mN -10 Z-+ > 2 m m N a s ZD"0=An0 Z rn m G)° Co G D0 =00Dm ZO imD *( DD z W m �N- mz 0M DO Z rnT auN $ Do SO DEC no •D N D .. � O� Z zizM -o m00 ccr, D 1'1 omm S" °0 tmJ I -� I-FFF 31 -o 0 � mcmOO 0)o � zWKW°x r O I r D �� N 0 I+ mvo m -0mx < xm0� O 'alaipgzONaD�Ofm Cl) m x �momo xi =oK=u)K D R1 m m�• -Cr Z Iii DM_ MD Dm m- CD• W D rW D II II II II W WmzmW DWZ XO)3z.00 r •• n cn-< cn WmD � < ° m1 x0 OO-1 mN '*) m Wr mm Z < AOOW o 4 D <—I << �)< 0 > o_ m� D ��O m -I �� II 1 immmrn rnm0 cnro a' o ll 0> m3>Ed(n S 0000 O (n DD DK In00Ai 0, 0 --1=I �ZA8 > 0 DDDD � Dyzi < - 0H0 U) OO mDZK Z nnn0 O NI-r DD yZ OWV)DO -► L7 -+zm� -D I+I+I+H- D Dzc (nx x = m?)-N r CA) O 2fn D SOD ( xi 0D ZC c D °O° O b) z Dp v zm z FF rn -I-1 mK m � =pmop W (11 O z W W W O x m N m mZ O �'•m A �mZmmm . (n Dwmo > If m A OZD ° C)O (n �O 0 m- xj m z� > II OT cn m oD � > >0= a zF o m T rya m zAo= m r or cn i C E „ mm o ""( C mz Z O O Opm 0m 37 D G D� D D fn V) v -i 0(1) J-71 A D m r I zW m �} ZT7 DD 0x D \°' mD 00 V, D Z 0 r- (nomD :O Q m Cl) D m W m W C) D 0� > :m c) _Ti 771 -I m cn 0 0Z mD _.0 A -iD Zm o r0 z= o i -1 : F1 Pi X70 O0 m- (7 _1m > -r 7 S0 �S z D D m MA ° > m• vrn.-- M �� r • $ m c z A o P D o m w 0▪ 1 rn f N m Packet Page-3117- _Q_,_. 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting a rezone from the Rural Agricultural zoning district to the CPUD zoning district to allow development of a maximum of 145,000 square feet of retail and office uses which include a maximum of 25,000 square feet of retail and a maximum of 60,000 square feet of medical office uses. The petitioner also requests hotel and motel uses at 20 units per acre and group housing (assisted living facility and independent living units) at 26 units per acre. The petitioner has offered a limitation for each acre of group housing or hotel or motel use, 10,626 square feet of retail or office use shall be subtracted from the total amount of allowable commercial square footage. The Master Plan shows one access point onto Pine Ridge Road via Good Earth Drive, and vehicular/bicycle/pedestrian interconnections to the east to Pine Ridge Center West PUD and to the East to the Baldridge PUD. The Master Plan shows the preserve locations, a water management lake and potential building locations and parking areas. The proposed seven deviations are also shown on the Master Plan. These are discussed later in this report. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Pine Ridge Road, then the partially developed 16± acre Cambridge Square PUD, approved for commercial uses in Ordinance#06-01 oore East: The partially developed 8.87± acre Pine Ridge Center West PUD, approved for commercial uses in Ordinance#01-09, then Kraft Road South: The developed Brynwood Preserve 29± acre subdivision with a zoning designation of PUD, Ordinance#2000-073 that was approved at a density of 5.47 dwelling units per acre West: North Naples Fire and Rescue station, with a zoning designation of Public (P) with a Special Treatment (ST) overlay, and the Marquesa Shopping Center, with a zoning designation of PUD(Baldridge PUD) Ordinances #07-33 and#02-55), then Livingston Road PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 2 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3118- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. t� `' _ °-',_,,,_-_,.......,---- , yy j( c --:".4.7 ' - P*WO�iROAD , b •, I .t';'.` y ' w`5 t5 -wa,r=. atd a.zrcaa Sw'- '.°(4.M.!r 5._.. r r fi�,jr. a ; r,,,'��-'i .d»4Sk Ir4` ",..' �-kk , tW'!" ;ii't,' 4,TE*gs Yk "MARW Alll § V t . , JON. .:. ' ,= 3 ' A-7"-i NEST' ..44".7,.'"'''^ .t f M � °� w» ;Sas aDI°,$+ y � ,..:',.,,,,,,,,...^:„.' ,f„'4 nua "1g , tq�,RDE.LrR k era, 4 a �, frj Y ig'L ,, t * ,F°«. ' � E VIEW Waal*b,I ,S y a,-»C t '+a .. �t{'�l` t s, 'r s .... .rr rs ,zA yi5.-13 + , �. ,� ',; t, •P .� j' t r it,',,, -- s y A� E.6 '"dam o *�k'Y” R " ' '"1, �' " t!a i.d n „v<a . " . ,„. % � , CND, "'a fitl� ,. .i .. *y, i.„, . r,. '4.a i., -- � �` �t,,, t � 'i j '� &r ...E � s r 2J.s ,- < -. -err _ €. /.1*-44'04-^^* t k DTI£aF ,i 'kM rs} �W '}V .,.,T .' b k k.Wl '^ 6]e. . .al„bsi+ I BRYNWOOD CENTER �� ku. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH �: „. ■ n�y3 , If A i'.'awsrcwK 'a. RIftX ►iA1. - LN4 t moil . w.as.w n r 'I DD Yw I w,--s 1 MA ,III- ./+�Ii a k 1 A o ` }i 4. n ,1I qa s I uLEGEND f Pt+tE RI'r..E*C,*,') I�iF7.iica;.E F.TivrTT CE\IER DIVE S* E RC= wtxEC U.E 9Jt IS'P�l- UtiP- Tri'.l°I*E''''- u.w*Et(IAL InFlIL t�+5t4 fl1 T An exhibit showing the subject property's location in relationship to the Mixed use Activity Center, the Interchange Activity Center and the LivingstonlPine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict. PUDZ PL2011-0000406,Brynwood Center Page 3 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3119- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN(GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict as depicted in the Future Land Use Element [FLUE] and on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan [GMP]. The petition is reliant upon the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, a text-based provision in the FLUE. Below is the Subdistrict as proposed for amendment, followed by staff analysis [bold text]. Office and In-fill Commercial Subdistrict: The intent of this Subdistrict is to allow low intensity office commercial or infill commercial development on small parcels within the Urban Mixed Use District located along arterial and collector roadways where residential development, as allowed by the Density Rating System, may not be compatible or appropriate. Lower intensity office commercial development attracts low traffic volumes on the abutting roadway(s) and is generally compatible with nearby residential and commercial development. The criteria listed below must be met for any project utilizing this Subdistrict. For purposes of this Subdistrict, "abuts" and"abutting" excludes intervening public street, easement (other than utilities) or right- of-way, except for an intervening local street; and "commercial" refers to C-1 through C-5 zoning districts and commercial components of PUDs. a. The subject site is in the Urban-Mixed Use District. [It is.] b. The subject site abuts a road classified as an arterial or collector on the Collier County Functional Class Map, as adopted in the Transportation Element. [Pine Ridge Road is classified as an arterial.] Aiew c. A rezone to commercial zoning is requested for the subject property in its entirety, up to a maximum of 12 acres. For a property greater than 12 acres in size, the balance of the property in excess of 12 acres is limited to an environmental conservation easement or open space. Under this provision, "open space" shall not include water management facilities unless said facilities are incorporated into a conservation or preservation area for the purpose of enhancement of the conservation or preservation area. [The total site is 13.65 acres; 3.1 acres are preserve yielding the "developable" portion of the site at less than 12 acres (10.55 acres).] d. The site abuts commercial zoning: (i) On one side and that abutting commercial site is not within an infill Subdistrict in the Urban Mixed Use District or the Urban Commercial District; or, (ii) On both sides. [Commercial zoning abuts the east boundary — Pine Ridge Center West PUD, and about one-half of the west boundary—Baldridge PUD.] e. The abutting commercial zoning may be in the unincorporated portion of Collier County or in a neighboring jurisdiction. [OK.] f. The depth of the subject property in its entirety, or up to 12 acres for parcels greater than 12 acres in size, for which commercial zoning is being requested, does not exceed the depth of the commercially zoned area on the abutting parcel(s). Where the subject site abuts commercial zoning on both sides, and the depth of the commercially zoned area is not the same on both abutting parcels, the Board of County Commissioners shall have discretion in determining how to interpret the depth of the commercially zoned area which cannot be exceeded, but in no case shall the depth exceed that on the abutting property with the greatest oft PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 4 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3120- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. depth of commercial area. This discretion shall be applied on a case-by-case basis. [Depth of subject site does not exceed depth of adjacent commercial properties.] g. Project uses are limited to office or low intensity commercial uses if the subject property abuts commercial zoning on one side only. For property abutting commercial zoning on both sides, the project uses may include those of the highest intensity abutting commercial zoning district. [Proposes uses are of comparable intensity as those in the two adjacent PUDs.] h. The subject property in its entirety was not created to take advantage of this provision, evidenced by its creation prior to the adoption of this provision in the Growth Management Plan on October 28, 1997. [Criterion met.] i. For those sites that have existing commercial zoning abutting one side only: (i) commercial zoning used pursuant to this Subdistrict shall only be applied one time and shall not be expanded, except for aggregation of additional properties so long as all other criteria under this Subdistrict are met; and, (ii) uses shall be limited so as to serve as a transitional use between the commercial zoning on one side and non-commercial zoning on the other side. [N/A] j. For those sites that have existing commercial zoning abutting both sides, commercial zoning used pursuant to this Subdistrict shall only be applied one time and shall not be expanded, except for aggregation of additional properties so long as all other criteria under this Subdistrict are met. [OK.] k. Lands zoned for support medical uses pursuant to the "1/4 mile support medical uses" provision in the Urban designation shall not be deemed"commercial zoning" for purposes of this Subdistrict. [N/A] 1. Land adjacent to areas zoned C-1/T on the zoning atlas maps, or other commercial zoning obtained via the former Commercial Under Criteria provision in the FLUE, shall not be eligible for a rezone under the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, except through aggregation as provided in Paragraphs i. and j. above. [N/A] m. For purposes of this Subdistrict, property abutting land zoned Industrial or Industrial PUD, or abutting lands zoned for Business Park uses pursuant to the Business Park Subdistrict, or abutting lands zoned for Research and Technology Park uses pursuant to the Research and Technology Park Subdistrict, shall also qualify for commercial zoning so long as all other criteria under the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict are met. [N/A] n. At time of development, the project will be served by central public water and sewer. [County central water and sewer service is available to the site. o. The project will be compatible with existing land uses and permitted future land uses on surrounding properties. [Comprehensive Planning staff defers to Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety.] p. The maximum acreage eligible to be utilized for the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict within the Urban Mixed Use District is 250 acres. [This threshold has not been reached.] In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 5 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3121- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [Exhibit C, the PUD Master Plan, depicts direct access to Pine Ridge Road, an arterial road per the Transportation Element.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [No street system for the project is proposed. Nonetheless, Exhibit C, the PUD Master Plan, depicts a single access to Pine Ridge Road; by default, access to individual parcels would be internal — or via interconnection with commercial properties to the east and west.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. [No street system for the project is proposed. Exhibit C, the PUD Master Plan, depicts interconnection to the east (Pine Ridge Center CPUD) and west (Baldridge ostic PUD). A preserve area/buffer is located along the entire southern boundary of the site, and the property to the south is a built-out residential development.] Policy 7.4 The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [For the most part, this policy is not applicable since this is not a residential project. The required open space is depicted on Exhibit C, the PUD Master Plan.] Based upon the above analysis, the proposed PUD may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element if staff's recommended conditions are included in any recommendation of approval. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 year planning period. Therefore, the subject application can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan(GMP). Pine Ridge Road Impacts: The first concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 67.2, Pine Ridge Road between Livingston Road and I-75. The project generates 278 p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips, which represents a significant impact of 7.45% by the project. This segment of Pine Ridge Road ossi, PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 6 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page -3122- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. currently has a remaining capacity of 1,245 trips, and is currently at LOS "D" as reflected by the 2011 AUIR. The next concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 67.1, Pine Ridge Road between Airport Road and Livingston Road. The project generates 149 p.m. peak hour, off-peak direction trips, which represents a significant impact of 3.99% by the project. However, these trips are generated in the off-peak direction, so they are not evaluated as a consistency requirement. In the Peak Direction,this segment of Pine Ridge Road currently has a remaining capacity of 1,057 trips, and is currently at LOS "D" as reflected by the 2011 AUIR. An additional concurrency link that is impacted by this project is Link 68.0, Pine Ridge Road between I-75 and Logan Boulevard. The project generates 102 p.m. peak hour, peak direction trips, which represents a significant impact of 2.70%by the project. This segment of Pine Ridge Road currently has a remaining capacity of 1,677 trips, and is currently at LOS "C" as reflected by the 2011 AUIR. All three concurrency segments listed above are within the East Central TCMA. However, the applicant does not propose to exempt this project from concurrency requirements, and accordingly,there are no TCMA requirements applied. No subsequent links beyond these segments of Pine Ridge are significantly impacted by this project. This analysis includes evaluation of both links 48.0 and 49.0, Livingston Road from Vanderbilt Beach to Pine Ridge, and Pine Ridge to Golden Gate Parkway (respectively); neither of which is significantly impacted. Note: In accordance with Collier County Planning Commission guidance, the developer has proposed a trip generation cap of 565 unadjusted,two-way,PM Peak hour trips. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). This project was not required to go before the Environmental Advisory Council Board (EAC) since this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. The project site consists of 7.16 acres of native vegetation that generally consists of pine and pine-cypress mixed forested communities with varying degrees of exotic vegetation. A minimum of 15% of the existing native vegetation shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. The minimum native preservation requirement is 1.07 acres. The PUD master plan provides 3.10 acres of native preservation. No state or federally listed wildlife nests or burrows were found on the project site. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. A finding of consistency with the FLUE and FLUM designations is a portion of the overall finding that is required, and staff believes the petition is consistent with the FLUM and the FLUE as indicated previously in the PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 7 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3123- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. GMP discussion, except as expounded upon in the Zoning Analysis Section of this report. The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP Transportation Element as previously discussed. Environmental staff also recommends that the petition be found consistent with the CCME. Therefore, zoning staff recommends that the petition be found consistent with the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP if the limitation contained in the Zoning Analysis Section is included in any recommendation of approval. ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Subsection 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.03.05.I, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the bases for their recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support its action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document to address environmental concerns. There are no outstanding environmental issues. Transportation Review: Transportation Division staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document and Master Plan for right-of-way and access issues. The PUD document contains the mitigation discussed in the Transportation Element section of this staff report. Utility Review: Any portions of this PUD to be developed shall be required to comply with Ordinance Number 2004-31, as it may be amended. The project is subject to the conditions associated with a Water and Sewer Availability Letter from the Collier County Utilities Division. Zoning Services Review: FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses and intensity on the subject site, the compatibility analysis included a review of the subject proposal comparing it to surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location. Zoning staff is of the opinion that this project will be compatible with and complementary to, the surrounding land uses only if other limitations are included as discussed on the next page and in the deviation discussion. To support that opinion staff offers the following analysis of this project. PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 8 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page -3124- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. The development standards contained in Exhibit B of the PUD document show the following: PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 sq.ft. N/A AVERAGE LOT WIDTH 100 ft. N/A MINIMUM YARDS(External) From Pine Ridge Road ROW 25 ft. SPS From Eastern Project Boundary 25 ft.* 15 ft. From Western Project Boundary 25 ft. 15 ft. From Southern Project Boundary** 90 ft.(two stories) 25 ft 120 ft.(three stories) MINIMUM YARDS(Internal) _Internal Drives(from edge of driveway pavement) 15 ft. 10 ft. From Internal Tract Boundaries 15 ft. 10 ft. Lakes 20 ft.*** 20 ft.*** Preserves 25 ft. **** 10 ft. **** MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS 1/2 the sum of zoned building 10 ft. heights MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONED ACTUAL (Either with or without parking in these structures) Retail Buildings(two stories) 35 ft. 45 ft. 25 ft. Office Buildings(three stories) 40 ft. 50 ft. 35 ft. _ Hotel and Motel(three stories) 40 ft. 50 ft. 35 ft. Hotel and Motel(four stories)***** 50 ft. 60 ft. 35 ft. Group Housing(three stories) 40 ft. 50 ft. 35 ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 sq.ft. N/A SPS=same as principal use setback. * No setback is required from the east property line provided a unified plan is approved with the Pine Ridge West PUD. ** No sound speaker systems within 400 feet of the south property line. The only sound speaker systems permitted are for drive-through windows for uses such as banks or fast food restaurants. Some uses listed in Exhibit A are subject to additional setback restrictions from the south property line. *** Measured from lake control elevation. **** Measured from the Preserve Tract, structural buffers are permitted within the setback area. See also the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibit C-1). ***** Not permitted within 400 feet from the south property line. As shown in the aerial photograph located on page 2 of the staff report, the surrounding land use and zoning discussion of this staff report, and the Master Plan,the site is bounded to the east and west by PUD zoned projects that allow various commercial retail and office uses. To the north, across Pine Ridge Road, is similarly zoned land. The land to the east is only partially developed with an office complex; that 9± acre known as the Pine Ridge Center West PUD, allows a minimum lot area of 12,000 square feet and front yard setback of 25 feet along Pine Ridge Road. Buildings in this PUD can be up to three stories high or 40 feet high, whichever is less. The list PUDZ-PL2011-0000406,Brynwood Center Page 9 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3125- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. of allowable uses it divided into three development parcels, A, B and C, with limited uses allowed in areas B and C which are located closer to the Brynwood Preserve subdivision. To the west is a fire and rescue station. Also to the west, the Baldridge PUD (developed as the Marquesa Plaza) allows a retail and office uses with a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet with 25-foot wide required setbacks along Pine Ridge Road, Livingston Road and the eastern property line. A 50-foot wide setback is required along the south property line where the project abuts the Brynwood Preserve subdivision. Building height is limited to 35 feet for retail and general commercial uses, and general and medical office uses are limited to three stories with a 40-foot maximum height. The Baldridge PUD also abuts Brynwood Preserve subdivision to the south and a 100+ foot wide preserve area separates the buildings in the Baldridge PUD from the homes within Brynwood Preserve. In the current petition, the petitioner wishes to be allowed to have Eating Places (Group 5812) uses as shown in the PUD document Exhibit A.I.34. Pursuant to PUB document Section B.III.C, the project can be developed with a Drinking Places (GROUP 5813) as accessory uses to Eating Places. Exhibit BA would allow this combined use within 90 feet of the south property line. Staff evaluated this petition for compatibility and has determined that those proposed uses could create a situation where customers may congregate outside a restaurant where liquor is served that could adversely impact the nearly residential neighborhood. A similar situation arose in the Stevie Tomato's establishment located in the Richland PUD. This business is located in the shopping center at the intersection of Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard. Neighbors went to the Board of County Commissioners voicing complaints about the noise from that Awoott establishment. The Stevie Tomatoes business is located approximately 150 feet from the nearest residential property line. Staff wants to avoid a similar situation and recommends that stand- alone Eating Places (Group 5812) that also have Drinking Places (Group 5813) be prohibited in the southerly 400 feet of this project. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed maximum zoned building heights proposed in the project are compatible with the area given the locational limitations proposed for the taller use structures such as hotels and motels. Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking seven deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The deviations are listed in PUD Exhibit E. Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1,to increase the floor area ratio (F.A.R.) from 0.45 to 0.60 for group housing/continuing care retirement community. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states in his justification for this deviation the following: The justification for this deviation has been supported by the CCPC and BCC with accommodations for a broader range amenities required by continuing care retirement communities to reduce the amount of offsite travel. Aolk PUDZ-PL2011-0000406,Brynwood Center Page 10 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPCk,=_ Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page -3126- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. As noted by the petitioner,this allowance has been approved in other projects. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is `justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.1, Sidewalks and Bike Paths requirements that requires sidewalks on both sides of the street. The deviation is to not require sidewalks on either side of the street if a sidewalk network is provided which continuously connects all development tracts to each other,to Pine Ridge Road,and to the east and west neighboring tracts. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation: The justification for this deviation is that pedestrian pathways and sidewalks will connect all development tracts just as they would along the interconnecting roadway. The proposed pedestrian access will allow access closer to building and parking areas and will have dedicated crosswalks at roadway crossings. It will also connect to the neighboring east and west developments. Largely for safety reasons, and since the internal main roadway will carry traffic from this property and adjoining development, it is preferable to maintain separation between pedestrians and the traffic. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is `justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.H, Fences and Walls that requires when nonresidential development lies contiguous to or opposite a residentially zoned district, said nonresidential development shall provide a masonry wall or prefabricated concrete wall or fence. The deviation is not to require a wall or fence along the south property line where a lake or the southwest preserve area lies between the commercial developed area and the south property line. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation: The justification for this deviation is that a lake and the southwest preserve in combination with north buffer of the neighboring Brynwood Preserve will provide ample PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 11 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3127- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. screening and buffering between this project's development areas and neighboring residential development. The developed site in the southeast corner will provide an enhanced Type B landscape buffer, wall and natural preserve. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: As shown in the excerpt from the Master Plan below, the applicant wishes to utilize the proposed lake and preserve to provide the required buffering to separate this project's southeastern corner from the Brynwood Preserve subdivision residents. This circumstance also provides similarities with the Stevie Tomato's issue in the Richland PUD noted earlier. During the rezoning process the preserve area near the shopping center were deemed adequate to address incompatible uses. However, subsequent to the rezoning action, the preserve area was damaged by several fires, which reduced the amount and thickness of the preserve vegetation. The fires reduced the preserve area's ability to buffer the uses. In the Marquesa Shopping Center (the neighboring property), another issue arises regarding native preserve areas that act as buffers. In that instance, the preserve remains in place without any fire damage, however during the winter months when the Brynwood Preserve subdivision residents possibly have more windows and doors open and spend more time outdoors, the deciduous trees and other plants within the preserve do not provide as much noise attenuation because the leaves are dropped during that time of year. Additionally, in 2003, the county granted an administrative fence waiver that alleviated the requirement to place a fence along the south property line separating the Marquesa Plaza Shopping Center from the Brynwood Preserve subdivision [AVA-2003-AR-3930]. That approval was based upon the 100-foot wide preserve area that separates the two uses. However, there have been complaints from residents of the subdivision regarding noise from a tire store that is located at the southernmost portion of the Marquesa Plaza. Apparently the bay doors of the tire store face the outdoor use areas of the homes, and the noise emanating from the establishment are offensive to the neighbors(see NIM notes). d, *. 4'. `3.e re x :' : _„ 't ? ti , r *a r4 ,: '1 ' . iis k µ , S£ ia. The petitioner is proposing to include an enhanced buffer and setback area along the eastern half of the south property line; the deviation would only be affective in the western portion of the site. The petitioner has included additional stipulations in the PUD document to alleviate staff's PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 12 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3128- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. concerns with the proposed deviation: 1) limit the location of uses that could create negative impacts to the neighbors, such as tire stores and gas stations; 2) limit the orientation of said uses such that overhead doors will not be oriented toward residential uses; 3) provide much wider preserve and lake areas. However, staff is not convinced that it would be in the best interests of the residents of the Brynwood Preserve to approve this deviation, especially in light of the proposed PUD that would allow Eating and Drinking Places within 90 feet of the south property line. In the Naples Gateway PUD (Ordinance 00-14) that is located across Pine Ridge Road from the subject site, during the rezoning process, the residents of Livingston Woods were quite adamant that not only a wall be constructed, but enhanced buffering had to provided and said buffering had to be placed along the residential side of that wall. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends DENIAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has not demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has not demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation 4 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.0 which requires a 60-foot right-of-way width for local streets. The deviation is to allow for a 40-foot wide private roadway easement or right-of-way. (See cross section on Exhibit C-1 CPUD Master Plan). Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation: The justification for this deviation is that the proposed cross section is adequate to meet the ingress and egress needs and drainage and utilities requirements of the proposed CPUD. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is `justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation 5A seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.9.a, pertaining to setbacks for on premises directional signs which requires directional signs to maintain a setback 10 feet from the edge of the roadway, paved surface or the back of the curb. This deviation would allow the directional signs to be located 5 feet from the edge of roadway pavement as depicted on the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibit C). Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation: PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 13 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3129- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. The justification for this deviation of reducing this setback is that these signs are a convenience to the motoring public by placing the directional signs closer to the roadway to enhance their visibility. This will not contravene the public, health, safety and welfare. The controlled speed at the entrances will further insure this. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation 5B seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.1.b which requires pole and ground signs to be setback 10 feet from property line. This deviation is to allow the directional signs to be set back 3 feet from the property line to the east and west interconnecting access road entrances as depicted on the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibit C). Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation: The justification for this deviation is that these signs will have more convenient visual exposure to motorists as they enter the development to their intended destination. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.9.b, which allows on-premises directional signs to be combined into a single sign 64 square feet in area. This deviation is to allow two directional signs, each up to 64 square feet in area at the east and west interconnecting access road entrances as depicted on the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibit C). Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation: The justification for this deviation is that directional visibility can be provided at each entrance of the east and west connector roads to better direct ingressing vehicles to their intended destination from the two points of interconnection. PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 14 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page -3130- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation No. 7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.3, pertaining to directory signs which allows multiple-occupancy parcels or multiple parcels developed under a unified development plan with a minimum of 8 independent units and containing 25,000 square feet of leasable floor area to be permitted on a directory sign and which allows a minimum of 4 panels and a maximum of 8 panels. This deviation is to allow a minimum of 2 independent panels to be displayed on directory sign at the project entrance on Pine Ridge Road as depicted on the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibit C). Four or more independent tenants/users shall be permitted to have a 150 SF directory sign per LDC Section 5.06.04.F.3.C. Two or three independent tenants/users shall have a maximum 100 SF directory sign. Petitioner's Rationale: The petitioner provided the following justification for this deviation: The justification for this deviation is that there may be as few as two tenants/users including one on Pine Ridge Road. Any tenants/users behind this will have no exposure to Pine Ridge Road and motorists would have no way of recognizing the existence of another establishment without the aid of signage on Pine Ridge Road. Allowing a minimum of two tenants/users to be displayed on the directory sign is a convenience to the motoring public so they will be able to clearly ident all establishments_from Pine Ridge Road Furthermore, if an office building was developed to the south of the Pine Ridge Road frontage it could have multiple tenants. For example, an office building could have medical uses and clinics, banks, real estate offices that also may wish to be located on the directory sign depending on the composition of end users in the PUD for the convenience of the motoring public. The reason for limiting the size of the directory sign to 100 SF for two or three tenants/users is to reduce the size of the sign in recognition that it justifies the need for less sign area. However,four or more tenants/users shall be permitted to have a 150 SF directory sign (as allowed by LDC) as a convenience to the motoring public so the sign is readily visible from Pine Ridge Road and not dissimilar to the size of other signs on this roadway. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. PUDZ-PL2011-0000406,Brynwood Center Page 15 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3131- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." FINDINGS OF FACT: LDC Subsection 10.03.05.I.2 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below. [Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold, non-italicized font]: PUD Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed uses are compatible with the approved uses and existing development in the area, as further limited by staff requiring the revision of Exhibit B.V.C. to state the following: Stand-alone Eating Places (Group 5812) that also have Drinking Places (Group 5813) are prohibited in the southerly 400 feet of this project. In addition, as limited above, the proposed property development regulations provide adequate assurances that the proposed project will be suitable to the type and pattern of development in the area. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application,which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to obtain platting and/or site development approval. Both processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. AgiNt PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 16 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3132- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP if staff's additional limitation noted in #1 above is included to ensure compliance with FLUE Policy 5.4. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis Section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed uses, development standards and developer commitments will help ensure that this project is compatible with the surrounding area if staff's additional limited noted in #1 above is included in any approval recommendation. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project as noted in the GMP FLUE and Transportation Element consistency review, if the mitigation proposed by the petitioner is included in any approval recommendation. In addition, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The petitioner is seeking seven deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06.A). This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be PUDZ-PL2011-0000406,Brynwood Center Page 17 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page -3133- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff believes with the exception of Deviation #3 that staff is not supporting, the deviations can be supported, finding that,in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the elements may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviations are "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Please refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report for a more extensive examination of the deviations. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.03.05.1 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, &policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Staff is recommending that this project be found consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the project to be compatible with neighborhood development and with all other applicable policies of the GMP if any approval recommendation contains the limitation shown in PUD Finding#1 above and if Deviation#3 is denied. 2. The existing land use pattern; Adw Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed it at length in the zoning review analysis. Staff believes the proposed rezoning is appropriate given the existing land use pattern, and development restrictions included in the PUD Ordinance and recommended by staff. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; The proposed PUD rezone would not create an isolated zoning district because the abutting lands are also zoned PUD. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed district boundaries are logically drawn since the zoning boundary mirrors the existing property boundary. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary,per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes and the project's consistency with the GMP. However the site is currently zoned Rural Agricultural while located in an urban GMP land use designation,Urban Residential Subdistrict. Thus it seems logical to rezone the site PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 18 of 24 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page -3134- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. to allow development with more intense uses. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; Staff is of the opinion that the proposed change, subject to the proposed list of uses and property development regulations and the proposed Development Commitments detailed in Exhibit F, along with staffs recommended limitation, is consistent with the County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Therefore,the proposed change should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time subject to the Transportation Commitments contained in Exhibit F of the RPUD ordinance. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; The proposed change should not create drainage or surface water problems because the LDC specifically addresses prerequisite development standards that are designed to reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. Additionally, the LDC and GMP have other specific regulations in place that will ensure review for drainage on new developments. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; If this petition were approved, any subsequent development would need to comply with the applicable LDC standards for development or as outlined in the PUD document. This project's property development regulations provide adequate setbacks and distances between structures; therefore the project should not significantly reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results,which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. There is no guarantee that the project will be marketed in a manner comparable to the surrounding developments. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; Properties surrounding this site to the north (across Pine Ridge Road), west and south are already developed. The site to the east is partially developed. The proposed changes in this rezone petition are not anticipated to be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property. PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 19 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3135- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare; The proposed development complies with the Growth Management Plan which is a public policy statement supporting Zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; The property could be developed within the parameters of the existing agricultural zoning; however, the proposed zoning more correctly reflects the intent of development allowed in the GMP. In any case, however, the petitioner is seeking this rezone in compliance with LDC provisions for such action to seek the highest and best use of the land. The petition can be evaluated and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff believes the proposed rezone meets the intent of the PUD district and further, believes the public interest will be maintained. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County; Asolc As noted previously, the proposed rezone boundary follows the existing property g P P rt3' ownership boundary. The GMP is a policy statement which has evaluated the scale, density and intensity of land uses deemed to be acceptable throughout the urban- designated areas of Collier County. Staff is of the opinion that the development standards and the developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a particular zoning petition. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP as discussed in other portions of the staff report. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 20 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page -3136- i I 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require considerable site alteration and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan or platting approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as it may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD document. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant's agent, Patrick Vanasse, Planning Director of RWA conducted a duly noticed NIM on January 30, 2012, at the Hawthorne Suites located at 3557 Pine Ridge Road in Naples, Florida. There were eight (8) residents in attendance at the meeting. In addition, the consultants representing the Petitioner, included Philip Fischler, P.E., Richard Yovanovich, Esquire, Bob Duane, AICP, George H. Hermanson, P.E., and David Wheeler, Transportation Consultant were in attendance. Richard Yovanovich made the presentation. He described the permitted uses and proposed development standards with an emphasis on building heights and setbacks. The proposed building height was 60 feet for two stories along the south property line and 120 feet for three stories from the south property line. Mr. Yovanovich noted that a four story building for a hotel/motel was permitted 400 feet from the south property line. Aerial photos and line of site exhibits were displayed depicting the location and orientation of the buildings throughout the project. Mr. Yovanovich pointed out that the line-of-site exhibits with the existing vegetations in place would screen and buffer buildings from Brynwood Preserve. (Additional plantings along the south property line in Brynwood Center would further augment screening along with the proposed wall). Mr. Yovanovich emphasized that many uses were not permitted in the 400-foot setback area depicted on the aerial photo and as further set forth in the permitted use handout distributed at PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 21 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page-3137- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. the meeting. He noted that automotive uses were restricted to 600 feet from the south property line. He also noted that restrictions have been placed in the CPUD for eating and drinking places including restaurants and lounge area that may be included in a hotel/motel on the southern portion of the property (for example, limiting them to the northern portion of a structure at this location.) The CPUD Conceptual Plan was also made available at the meeting. Resident concerns brought up at the meeting included the following: The width of the proposed preserve area on a portion of the southern property. One resident preferred the width of the preserve area in the Baldridge PUD to the west. This preserve area is approximately 150 feet wide. The proposed preserve areas within the Brynwood Center CPUD varies from 250±feet in width along the southwestern portion of the property and narrows to 35± feet along the southeastern portion of the property plus a 15-foot-wide landscaped buffer and solid wall. An additional 40± foot buffer area exists along the northern edge of Brynwood Preserve. Mr. Yovanovich explained that a 120-foot setback was provided for projects in excess of two stories to show further separation from the Brynwood Preserve PUD. There were concerns that a wider buffer area should be provided. Mr. Yovanovich indicated that he would meet again with residents to review this issue further. Concerns were expressed by several residents about the noise in the tire store in the southern portion of the Baldridge PUD to the west. Mr. Yovanovich noted again the that the PUD required similar types of automotive uses to be setback 600 feet from the southern property line and that bay doors were oriented east and west to reduce noise. The tire store in Baldridge PUD has the bay doors oriented to the south. One resident did not want the project built and believed there were too many vacant or un- needed buildings in the market already. Richard indicated that the property was zoned for agriculture use and this was never the intended use of the property. Furthermore, the proposed commercial zoning was consistent with the Growth Management Plan that allowed the proposed commercial uses. The same resident thought the plan was too vague and did not provide enough specifics or assurances to residents. He spoke of the "trust us" mentality. Mr. Yovanovich reiterated the development standards provided ample protection and that this was not a speculative project. He noted that when the market recovers end users will come forward. There are presently no specific plans for end users. Some questions were asked by residents about project access, and the pattern of access emerging along Pine Ridge Road. Mr. Yovanovich indicated that access was right in right out, similar to some other projects in the area with a westbound left turn lane into the property. It was also noted that connections were provided to the east and west to help better distribute project traffic. Some general questions were brought up regarding water management. George Hermanson indicated that the project would be filled to the elevation of similar properties in the area and would drain to the north. One resident noted that the vegetation along the north property line of Brynwood Preserve shown in the aerial photos varied in its quality throughout the year and the photos taken may be a best , PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 22 of 24 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page -3138- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. case scenario. After the meeting, one resident expressed her desire that the wall be painted brown. Project representatives agreed to this request. The meeting came to a close at approximately 6:30 p.m. Mr. Yovanovich noted that we will get together again with the residents of Brynwood Preserve to go over with them solutions to concerns raised at the meeting. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office reviewed the staff report for this petition on July 16,2012. RECOMMENDATION: Zoning and Land Development Review Services staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PUDZ-PL20110000406 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval subject to the following: 1. Revise Exhibits A and B to indicate the following: Eating Places (Group 5812) with outdoor patios that are not associated with a hotel or motel use, are prohibited in the southerly 400 feet of this project. 2. Revise Exhibit E to remove Deviation #3, as staff is recommending denial of this deviation. PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 23 of 24 August 2, 2012 CCPC Revised: 7/17/12 Packet Page -3139- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. PREPARED BY: bud,,,,iv 71911a, KAY E4 ELEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEWED BY: 7-/6-11 RAYM D V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 7- I-7-(L MIKE BOSI, AICP, INTERIM DIRECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING APP it "►1 D BY: i. / / . n...._ /� J 1f Wit` NICK CASALANGUIDA, • r IST=`• TOR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION Tentatively scheduled for the September 25, 2012 Board of County Commissioners Meeting PUDZ-PL2011-0000406, Brynwood Center Page 23 of 23 August 2,2012 CCPC Revised 7/5/12 Packet Page-3140- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. C©LL-ie- County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.calllergov.net APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC Ht;ARiNG FOR: ❑ AMENDMENT TO PUD (PUDA) D PUD REZONE (PUDZ) ❑ PUD TO PUD REZONE (PUDDZ-A) PUDZ-PL20110000406 REV: 2 PETITION NO BRYNWOOD CENTER MPUD PROJECT NAME DATE: 1215/11 DUE: 114/12 DATE PROCESSED • APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT(S) First Community Bank of SW Florida/Philip J. Fischler ADDRESS 1565 Red Cedar Drive CITY Fort Myers STATE FL ZIP 33907 TELEPHONE# 239-895-1060 CELL# N/A FAX# 239-333-2964 E-MAIL ADDRESS: N/A NAME OF AGENT Robert Duane,AICP,Hole Montes, lnc./Richard Yovanovich, Esq.,Coleman,Yovanovich,Koester, P.A. ADDRESS 950 Encore Way/4001 Tamiami Trail North,Suite 300 CITY Naples STATE FL ZIP 34110 239-254-2000/239-435-3535 TELEPHONE# CELL# N/A FAX# 239-254-2099/239-435-121B E-MAIL ADDRESS: bobduane@ hmeng.com/ryovanovich @cyklawfirm.com BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. • • Packet Page-3141- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Co 7e-r Count, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.co€liergov.net ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http:(fwww.collieraov.nef/Index.aspx?page=774 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: Golden Gate Area Civic Association MAILING ADDRESS 3153 41st Street SW CITY Naples STATE FL zip 34113 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: Homeowners Association of Golden Gate MAILING ADDRESS 2335 Tamlaml Trail,Suite 308 CITY Naples STATE FL ZIP 34103 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: Golden Gate Area Civic Association MAILING ADDRESS 5391 19th Place SW CITY Naples STATE FL Zip 34116 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: Brynwood Preserve Home Owners Association MAILING ADDRESS 12852 Brynwood Preserve Lane CITY Naples STATE FL ZIP 34105 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP • • Packet Page-3142- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. ;ot_ per Covflty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.callieraov.net ... `.:• .J.sc(�stJCa ;�;i� etas. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address % of Ownership First Community Bank of SW Florida i000 c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address % of Ownership Packet Page-3143- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 9nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.coiliergov.net • d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address % of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers,stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address • Packet Page-3144- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.colliergov.net g. Date subject property acquired ® 121301201D. leased El Term of lease, _yrs./mos. lf, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing,it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf,to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. PROPERTY LOCATION Detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre- application meeting. NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range 18 /49S /26E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page#: Property I.D. #: 00288000000 Metes & Bounds Description: Fractional Description -See Legal Description Size of property: Irregular ft.X ft. =Total Sq. Ft. 594,594 Acres 13.65 Address/general location of subject property: PUD District (LDC 2.03.06): n Residential Community Facilities (� Commercial Industrial Packet Page-3145- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Coiner County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.colliergov.net ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N Cambridge Square PUD Vacant $ Brynwood PUD Residential E Pine Ridge Center West PUD Commercial and Vacant W Baldridge PUD Commercial Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject property? If so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page). Section/Township/Range N/A / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book Page#: Property ID.#: Metes & Bounds Description: REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from the A and A-ST zoning district(s)to the CPUD zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Vacant/Single-Family Home Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Commercial retail, Office, Motel, Group Housing Original PUD Name: N/A Ordinance No.: N/A • Oft Packet Page-3146- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Coal County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRi\(E GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.colliergov.net EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below. Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.B) 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas,traffic and access, drainage,sewer,water, and other utilities. See Evaluation Criteria. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. See Evaluation Criteria. 3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district,policy or other provision.) See Evaluation Criteria. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. See Evaluation Criteria. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. See Evaluation Criteria. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. See Evaluation Criteria. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. See Evaluation Criteria. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. See Evaluation Criteria. Packet Page-3147- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. c0gL ie-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.coIliergov.net Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many communities have adopted such restrictions.You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions, Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? ❑Yes 0 No If so,what was the nature of that hearing? Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge,has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes 0 No If so,please provide copies. 4 NOTICE: This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezonina for a period of six (6) months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be. re-opened by submitting a new application, repayment of all application fees and granting of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the project will be subject to the then current code. (LDC Section 10.03.05.0.) • Packet Page-3148- i 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. COO er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA I=AX 34'104 252-6358 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) www.colliergay.net. STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUb REZONE REQUEST L APPLICANT INFORMATION I NAME OF APPLICANT(S) First Community Bank of SW Florida ADDRESS 1565 Red Cedar Drive CITY Fort Myers STATE FL ZIP 33907 TELEPHONE# 239-210-2228 CELL # N/A FAX# 239-333-2964 E-MAIL ADDRESS: N/A ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY(IF AVAILABLE): 3480 Pine Ridge Road 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 Section/Township/Range 18 / 49S 126E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book Page#: Property I.D. #: 00288000000 Metes &Bounds Description: See Legal Description 1 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED 1 (Check applicable system): . COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM ® County System a. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ b. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ PROVIDE NAME c. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT ❑ (GPD capacity) d. SEPTIC SYSTEM TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM IS b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ PROVIDE NAME, d. PRIVATE SYSTEM(WELL) ❑ • Packet Page-3149- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Confer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.colliergov.net TOTAL POPULATION TO BE SERVED: 70,000 SF Office,25,000 SF Retail,110 Hotel Units PEAK AND AVERAGE DAILY DEMANDS: A. WATER-PEAK 31,980 AVERAGE DAILY 2000 B. SEWER-PEAK 24,830 AVERAGE DAILY 19,100 • IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED 2012 NARRATIVE STATEMENT: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: If the project is located within the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY CAPACITY FROM OTHER PROVIDERS: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. Packet Page-3150- i 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 1 i d r I II I II n _ I I lI ci <>Ems-• I .I ;� I •I y �� ``' r I Hi W o Q IIj� ,�?� Q I r�I II. zI ° >v In. 0 1 ° J z¢ l� ° w. (I� z g a °o I 1gUl c°� a) I •U NIdW 3�2�03 N I \ It F _.__.._—• Alri I 7 II cn Q W ,1} ��.. r >n. CB-7 /�/ (3 II cy CO i m -- -,� '�° f FE-1 III t- k I` — U �- ,ci,iii:I I— 4 a3 yzn � � �A _E r Q- {P'elt Z F to S i_ I jill ° Q W1 I a1 �!a:_! :A j- virtu-sa 1 III Ip 1/ I � � ,' '' co Z I z =_ I r I 11 g8��v,��x�.,,E„• ra r�r.A� � �t�� FxF,.9 0 � .,t..00 I I icy G 1 g III 1. . Iy I I c7 I,,-., . S tagI � «I ! " il P : era I l L err � _ I : r ? Too" N rcF sit �, m o ° r� I II z Lil .. . II �' ' I «1 , CLL NN CO f I Ill `.. I�! : dl 4 Ir'�k ,,,, nt. N .I 1 I a I ,` ') I . � r 3I . p 3.� z o u" = N L Q 1 !1 o 1I I � -..c.1.. - y I r ,�bra I �, III Z � Ili! 1 - 1 � w 4 �� rI _� 1 Ire � r �sF -, M CL I it CD .. . lo� I @ G�_ 1,.r. &'1,,,-t-1,. �F� yy" _ I I wiEa W._ , k 1 I ,'. aa21-''''--- 7,,, `. giftg.4•11''fr--'•- .' ' ,_,' '''.."".--1 0 ,r-L.::::(41 4 .0f,..1 - . -..z-,, .....m.-4,..-..4; 14 II - -L-LI -- ---,-, 1 i I • • S 1 I Ng---.-1'6--.**Arfi*r-',..,!": - ' ---.R1 ■ 2M 1 i:fit-: f __AiL,1=- --=3_,x:2- ...Ton! .1 .,--= '- -......:-...- 1,,,---=H- ---7 - 7"--1-4462:77-7— ___- ri V 47:4 v 24.e' mac N d' der 'r. krr 'f,"' I f I t - ----� � t +T'r3 ` i��d's. C,1 Of T i g W 111- _ 11 II 1 / of I UIIO ail .- ___ ._-. -_ o 0 o s . 1 .II 1 • H '. 1 N + 1 II :.. iI I . . ,.? PROPERTY LINE' 8C-)36-@(:).3Z N 0 Packet Page-3151- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. cOlYCounty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.conierciov.net AFFIDAVIT ire/I, First Community Bank of SW Florida being first duly sworn, depose and say that we/I am/are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made ❑ part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We/I understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate.and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owner We/I further authorize Robert Duane/Rich Yovanovich to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this Petition. ignature of P.. rty O• -r Signature of Property Owner /171 C c 6,LA ,e_tA 'Typed or Printed Name of Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner VICE PRESIDENT The foregoing.instru ent as,qc�knowledged before me this (® ' day of 1011-ed 20 1k , by IA -PA I n who is pers }_known tao me or has pr. - as identification. 0,3 State of Florida (Signature o' NM'y Public— - ate of . County of Collier Florida) © (Print,Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) UII. Stift F my conaksicm was sop Mien • s�' Ceottvission iYD 145653 Packet Page-3152- • • 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Co Der County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES,FLORIDA O FAX 34104 252-6358 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) www.colliergov.net COVEN.ANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as First Community Bank of SW Florida 1565 Red Cedar Drive,Fort Myers,FL 33907 (Street address and City,State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for MPUD planned unit development ( MPUD)zoning. We hereby designate Robert Duane/Richard Yovanovlch legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such,these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seelting the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes,but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications,plans,surveys,and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan,even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part,unless,and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards,and conditions of the planned unit development,seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits,certificates,or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner "Pt Owner 'rinted Name Printed Name VICE PRESIDE STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Q /� �n Sworn to(or a$irmed)and subscribedbefore me this b y of (�L 0'.by 1 F 6 who is p erso to me or has produced _ I��` en'- -.lion. • �!w�rli • • ns ANGELA Ii IERt ANDS ame types tinted stamped) Id ENI Prtt iOrl -State a 17,2 a %�V el Commission ft DD 71584 ' r°; &I1 i Thmu h National tia&y Assn. • Packet Page-3153- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. +yF if "tt Co Tex County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.colliergov.net PUD AMENDMENT(PUDA)-PUD REZONE(PUDZ)-PUD to PUD REZONE(PUDZ-A) APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW W/COVED.SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION. NOTE:INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. REQUIREMENTS #OF NOT COPIES REQUIRED REQUIREC STANDARD REQUIREMENTSi •. . .. _ - -.1:7- . 1 Additional set if located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area) Copies of detailed description of why amendment is necessary ❑ © ❑ Completed Application with list of Permitted Uses; Development Standards Table; List of proposed deviations from the LDC(if any); List of Developer Commitments and Statement of ❑ © ❑ Compliance narrative (download application from web for current form) PUD Conceptual Master Site Plan 24"x 36" and One 8 1/2" x 11"copy ❑ © ❑ Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24"x 36"and One 8 1/2" x 1 1"copy ❑ ❑ ia Original PUD doc/ord and Master Plan 24" x 36"—ONLY IF AMENDING THE PUD ❑ ❑ Revised PUD application with changes crossed thru&underlined ❑ ❑ Revised PUD application wJamended Title page word#'s,LDC 10.02.13.A.2 ❑ ❑ 0 Justification/Rationale for the Deviations (must be on a separate sheet within the application ❑ © ❑ material;please DO NOT include it in the PUD documents)•Copies of the foll'owing: •`- • • :. Deeds/Legal's&Survey (if boundary of original PUD is amended) 3 0 ❑ List identifying Owner& all parties of corporation 2 © ❑ Owner/Affidavit signed &notarized 2 0 ❑ Covenant of Unified Control 2 © ❑ Completed Addressing checklist 2 © ❑ Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) and digital/electronic copy of EIS or exemption ❑ justification 4 Historical Survey or waiver request 4 ❑ Utility Provisions Statement w/sketches 4 © ❑ Architectural rendering of proposed structures 4 ❑ Survey,signed&sealed 4 © ❑ Traffic Impact Statement(TIS)with applicable fees. For TIS guidelines& procedures refer to 7 © ❑ http://www.Golliemov.net/Index.aspx?nage=566 Recent Aerial Photograph (with habitat areas defined)min scaled 1"=400' 5 0 ❑ Electronic copy of all documents in Word format and plans(CDRom or Diskette) 2 © ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 © ❑ School Impact Analysis Application—residential projects only 2 ❑ (download the School Impact Analysis Application from website) If located in RFMU (Rural Frinae Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas -Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. Lacavera,State of Florida Division of Forestry @ 239-690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan", LDC Section 2.03.08.A.2.a.(b)i.c. Packet Page-3154- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. o «r Cou_nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION! NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-8358 www.colliergov.net EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION (If legal description is too long, add as an attachment) THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS PARCEL 116 AS DESCRIBED IN THE LIS PENDES RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 2631, PAGE 188 AND ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 2660, PAGE 3364 AND LESS PARCEL 115 AS DESCRIBED IN THE LIS PENDES RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 944, PAGE 494 AND THE STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 1185, PAGE 541, CONTAINING 13.650 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 2011 Packet Page-3155- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Packet Page-3156- I I 03/01/2011 09:49 TEL 92542099 ( PI LAND DEVELDPALNT Igj001/004 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Co Cott?My COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 28D0 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252.2400 VAX (239)252 5724 W 1W.COLLIEIB,GOV.NET +i',r+�,-!�`r.iR�,}(�nJ.0 r..-••'u�lS`a:I_°'•::�.,�O�s�i t z _.r'a�j.S.v...�{.TrF'I"r:r.T u'Kt.��M•t :•%.r�,r.�.i"'S��,'..1.�.. .. �Y '" r ....,..., Please complete the following and fax to the Operations Department at 238-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address, Form must be ationed by Addressing per annel Prior to pre- application meetinct, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all Items will apply to every project. Items in bard type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE(indicate type below,complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL(Blasting Permit) 0 SDP(Bite Development Plan) LI BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SOPA(SDP Arilendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI(Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI(Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP(Final Plat ❑ SNR(Street Name Change) ❑ L.LA(Lot Line Adjustm®nt) ❑ SNO(Street Name Change—Uhplatted) ❑ PNC(Project Name Change). ❑ TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) [] PPL(Plans &Plat Review) ❑ VA(Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP(Vegetation Removal Persil) ►�1 PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFF(Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) [} RZ(Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER emu• LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties(copy of lengthy description may be attached) SECTION l B, TOWNSFilP 49S, RANGE 26E — Pc c c ovo� Ll.5 FOLIO (Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach it', or associate.witty, lege/description if more than one) 00288000000, STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(as applicable, if already assigned) 348_0 PINE RIDGE ROAD • LOCATION MAP must be attechedlshowing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest ptiblic read right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed onlyt'ar+unplatted properties) PROPOS> P PROJECT NAME(if applicable) • PROPOSED STREET NAMES(if applicable) SITE DEVEi,OPMENT PLAN NUMItER(for existing profec .sfsites only) SDP - or AIR# PUDZ-PL20110000406 REV: 1 BRYNWOOD CENTER DATE: 7/22/11 !a t a DUE: 8/19/11 t ;: ' Packet Page-3157- 03/01/2011 09;49 TEL 92542099 H M LAND DEVELOPMENT 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 1 Co e ^ County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERN MNT' 2600 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX 09)252'724 • WWW.COLLIERGGOv.NEr Projeot of development names proposed far,or already appearing in.oondorninium documante Of application; indicate whether proposed or existing) 1RlP'IRI Please Check One: jj ChacicitRt Is to be Faxed beak ❑ Personally Picked Up APPLICANT NAME: BOB DUANIE, AICP/HOLE MONIES, INC. P'HQNE 239-254-2Q13 FAX 239-254-2099 Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street game approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department, FOR STAFF USE ONLY FLN Number(Primary) © C7 l--c crT D 0 O C.>0 Folio Number _ e Folio Number Folio Number Approved by; rye,,.CFX.Q - — - 1 ,1 • pate: Updated by: Data; IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UNDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 4-4 Avtor ilfi:i aY:,m 1,5 Packet Page-3158- INSTR 4511379 OR 4638 PG 1773 RECORDED 12/30/2010 3:42 PM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. DOC@.70 $49,318.50 REC $27.00 CONS $7,045,462.44 PUDZ-PL20110000406 REV: 1 BRYNWOOD CENTER DATE: 7/22/11 DUE: 8/19/11 • Prepared by and return to: JOHN A.NOLAND,ESQ. Henderson,Franklin,Starnes&Holt,PA Post Office Box 280 Fort Myers,Florida 339D2 (239)344-1100 Parcel I.R.No.:00288000000 WARRANTY DEED • THIS WARRANTY DEED,made the o21 day of JEccr,aeR20 /0,by • 3480 PINE RIDGE ROAD PARTNERS,LLC.a Florida limited liability company whose post office address Is: 3364 Cleveland Avenue, Fort Myers, FL 33901 hereinafter called the "Grantor",to -R CO ty FIRST CO ,to •:ANK OF SOS ` FLORIDA whose post office address is: 565 --• --•- Drive, F•rt Mye , F' 33907, hereinafter called the "Grantee". That the grantor, t.ICa,• • • « =■ th•.: Kr.10.00 and other valuable considerations,receipt where. -reby acknowledged, -reby sra rgains,sells,aliens,remises, n Collier County, Florida (the releases, conveys and confi ,'�r�• the grantee, all th-��- -in � tY "Property")described as: ff1 �j The East'h of the rte•'- ' of the •- N of Section 18,Township - 49 South,Range 26 Ea- , •' 4 •••a,less the West 1/z of the Northeast'/of the Northwes c- • 18,Township 49 South,Range 26,Collier County, Florida,less Parcel 116 as described in the Lis Pendens recorded in O.R.Book 2631,Page 188 and Order of Taking recorded in O. R.Book 2660,Page 3364 and less Parcel 115 as described in the Lis Pendens recorded in O.R.Book 944,Page 494 and the Stipulated Final Judgment recorded in O.R.Book 1185,Page 541. THIS DEED IS BEING GIVEN IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE OF A FIRST MORTGAGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT FROM GRANTOR TO GRANTEE,DATED APRIL 27, 2006 AND RECORDED APRIL 28,2006 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4026, PAGE 2171. SAID MORTGAGE HAVING BEEN MODIFIED BY MORTGAGE AND SECURITY MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 27, 2008 AND RECORDED MAY 22,2008 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4363, PAGE 0266, AND FURTHER MODIFIED BY SECOND MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT DATED MAY 28, 2009 AND RECORDED JUNE 5, 2009 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4459, PAGE 1348, AND FURTHER MODIFIED BY THIRD MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 15,2009 AND RECORDED DECEMBER 11, 2009 IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4518, PAGE 1165, ALL OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE GRANT OF THIS DEED IS AN ABSOLUTE CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY Packet Page-3159- OR 4638 PG 1774 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. ow HEREUNDER AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE AS ADDITIONAL SECURITY TO GRANTEE. THE CONSIDERATION OF THIS DEED IS THE FORBEARANCE OF THE GRANTEE, IN NOT INSTITUTING FORECLOSURE OF THE ABOVE- REFERENCED MORTGAGE. THE CLEAR INTENTION OF THE GRANTOR, AS MORTGAGOR,AND THE GRANTEE,AS MORTGAGEE,IS THAT THERE SHALL BE NO MERGER OF THE FEE CONVEYED HEREUNDER AND THAT THE LIENS OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED MORTGAGE IS PRESERVED IN FAVOR OF GRANTEE. Grantee has accepted this Warranty Deed upon the condition that (i)the title actually conveyed is as warranted herein;and(ii)the Warranty Deed is valid and binding. If title to the Property is not as warranted and represented,then Grantee has the right to disclaim any right, title or interest under this Warranty Deed because of the breach of a condition precedent to title,and in such event,Grantee shall then have the right as it may be advised to foreclose the lien of the Mortgage and shall not be bound by the Covenant Not to Sue. if this Warranty Deed should be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction, including, but not limited to a federal bankrupt court, to be invalid or Ineffective for any reason, or should it be vacated or set aside,then th- -•i ,•: ,L: �•s Warranty Deed and any-satisfaction of mortgage wIN have failed,and the Mo.• •: --, •- -a • e rights,remedies and obligations of Grantors and Grantee shall be res i..e)t• e status they ' -diately prior to the execution and delivery of this Warranty Deed a • -.- atisfaction of the Mortg- -,a • Grantee shall not be bound by the Covenant Not to Sue. TOGETHER with all e - :.;44- - :•e: - en and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any wise appe -in•• ! r odik TO HAVE AND TO H o?, - - • .-- s':.• fore E"! AND, the grantor here• lit -nants with said gra.• th:t -+� :ntor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple;that the grant .: •ood right and la f. nr •'t t• sell and convey said land;that the grantor hereby fully warrants- ti i • said land and will d: 'r e same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever;and that 7•4=•• • ee of- - noes. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said g - — - ed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. WITNESSES(as to Grantor): 3480 PINE RIDGE ROAD PARTNERS,LLC,a Florida limited i--sility company r 7:45)L A IF By l 0��w. 1 i it P 'n'�ame: �i 1�,I Al l INC j3�R Pete'Jepson, d•!gi g Member Print Name: vO 1 Pr rr.1YTG rllrr 2 • Adak Packet Page-3160- *** oR 4638 PG 1775 *** 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF F"— The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 30 day of bzGvmhA,- 2010 , by Peter Jepson, as Managing Member of 3480 PINE RIDGE ROAD PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of the company, who is personally known to me or has produced Cj Awakp 9,1t as identification. My Commission Expires: Notary Public (�;, Printed Name: \1C) Ier:2 � i nJ — UIII R T0038.00122 • 0 p H t- • 3 • Packet Page-3161- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. -g 2 _ ,v fiztgf@i 1 lo. ee 3 g al I i @i fig _"I d i g i ii 1 LI 1 111 1 itr F , 11 D1I' I Ii. i 91 g I� 1 1 if ' ill y I O i i e ; 1 Iii &1 ' oil l r PI F 1 $.l1ola1 € di #h il iii itit a o tiro no • m t Y Mr bSM A ...e°e la i s.ggii 1 I "PI 1 k - ice .. - I 18 f a p.a — �'� ■ FM iu ; i 11() hi 1 -I.'BA* .,.., h :�. _;I 1 1 J1 i R �i _! a;r EE Sig 7eA ; ..iY - ' i / € <f 5- 54R 1g6f� wiN IE 'F o- sENI Ems' Ares sssis.N E " 3 gt ap Dig 1 j jtP + _ .. ..,! i ii; i $ \ a --g a e 4 .� , I_ you g §d ei kIç/ jj . Pis l€� I i d y ggg el L� 4 ! �. ------''!hiawrM...._______. a,vrmw__ _ Aumnspimilig 4 il' d , 113Njt h NI of ,"y gigl �N1�14/$4!1/11k1 :.... .._._ _ ......_.. .. .__.__ ....... ... ....._..._.. ...._ ... _ - Q ... •-•- "•.A.'M.[q P•N^W.iamt-imt Yf�V.-cw-Y 9.1 YPP-XMRYV IY�SLtlYDt11RVCV1TCAf�.90pnN Packet Page-3162- - • . L oLL.' er UM/MU 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 • www.colliergov.net • .. ._ .•' . 'PRE ,PPIJCATION MEETING NOTES •• :. PUD Rezone (PUDZ) • • •.. . .•j _ P.UP t.,o PUD Rezone (PUDZ-A): ... •• ..• •• • ' _ PUD Amendment (PUDA) . • PL# a O((-0+.0 (Q Date: 3)2 24 I (( • Time: I :3O Firm: 4o(e.- R711teS - ThuGVUL 1)U) od C oYn m4-7 cs- C1¢ . j.\ C' f Project Name: Ilbile-,,_.956T ��D 1IV-R�GL _ Rina.ct Size of Project Site: acres Applicant Name: ' O Phone: `7 -DOa , . . Owner Name: ' Phone: • Owner Address: City State _ZIP . Existing PUD Name and Number NIA ZO KI-P A(3- Assigned Planner -KA,t, c.-e., -to \-N? U 0 Meeting Attendees: (attach Sign-In sheet) - , • - : :t'- •• 'Meeting Notes.: • coos Fo kces.-ss –Pir\g– QicV*0 6 DA ( ) Q.cmvmsultkoD % , ', '• iflag-.. APP - ( thoY, k.o .( o,u1d mss– palic t, ina4 11, e , . ` - .keN, tl_F. .o ' 1-4 0■51, -k-C-0,-c-1/4" (). 0,Ak\-0. C\-Q-D,\RX,SA vq , 4 ,'l a c-- i d. . . Tex' Cn+ s — kt Y‘ot •o (3 0 h E . • PUDZ-PL20110000406 REV: 1 Y' BRYNWOOD CENTER DATE: 7/22/11 •:- ::-.'f...!•-. DUE: 8/19/11 . ,,.,_ Packet Page-3163- GMT County 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.colliergov.net SCHOOL CONCURRENCY- For information regarding the school concurrency application process, please contact the School District of Collier County-Students, Staff Projections,Allocations and Reporting Department at 239-377-0254. • •PIT/ REZONE(PUD ,: ' • .•- PUD to P11)REZONE (PUDZ-A) • • •• • PUD AMENDMENT UDA . . • ' (p ) - _• •• :. ::::::•::-,•1. -r. • APPLICATION..•SI3EMITTAL••CHECKLIST . . • • . .• THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE; EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW W/COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION. NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. REQUIREMENTS # OF REQUIRED NOT .... . . _ COPIES REQUIRE:__ __ _ _ W. _ �l� 1ti �i� _ y'g yaI.7:f yK: _ 1 Additional set if located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle X Redevelopment Area) Vc Copies of det fled description of why amp is necessary lb * Completed Application(download from website for current form) B X itisw PUD Document&Conceptual Site Plan 24"x 36"and One 8 1/2" x 1761 11"copy > . Revised Conceptual Site Plan 24"x 36"and One 81/2" x 11"copy I I > Original PUD document and Master Plan 24"x 36" I ONLY IF AMENDING'11f PUD • )( Revised PUD document with changes crossed-thru_&underlined . .I I Revised PUD document w/amended Title page w/ord#'s,LDC I 1 10.02.13.A.2 �C Deeds/Legal's & Survey(if boundary of original PUD is amended) 3 X List identifying Owner&all parties of corporation 2 X Owner/Affidavit signed&notarized 2 - Covenant of Unified Control 2 • A Completed Addressing checklist (no mole_-flan s, 610,o ia) 2 X Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) * or exemption justification 2 Digital/electronic copy of EIS (copy for Planner&Environmental) 2 Historical Survey or waiver request 4 > . I Utility Provisions Statement ket 4 x Architectural rendering of proposed structures 4 NA Survey, signed& sealed (no more (, Nip.o(t{ 4 Y. - Traffic Impact Statement(TTS) or waiver(with applica le fees) 7 7( Copy of Traffic Impact Statement(•11S) on CDROM 3 X • Aerial photographs (taken within the previous 12 months min. scaled r r;� 1"=200'), showing r•LUCCS Codes,Legend, and project boundary 5 _' . Packet Page-3164- '-:' i GILter County 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.collieraov.net Electronic copy of all documents in Word format and plans(CDRom 3 1 or Diskette) X Justification/R.ationale for the Deviations (must be on a separate sheet within the application material;DO NOT include it in the PUD documents) Copies of Official Interpretations and/or Zoning Verifications .1. x School Impact Analysis Application (residential components) 2 x 1 set for School District(residential components) ❑ r... �;p 7`.._ ,;?��rti�i"ti1:r.;,i .`"�.LC=�?ri C' ; }q;• = Efir ab,�`' 0:l sia -,.o cpaio 0r p 0lopment, aurica-i: o .0S,:'$:;'• ` ,,_::: EDC"Fast Track"must submit approved copy of official application 2 Y. [Affordable Housing"Expedited"must submit copy of.signed Certificate of Agreement. **If project includes an Affordable Housing component,you are required to schedule a meeting before the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee by contacting the Collier County Housing and Human Services Department at 239-252-2273. /*Check here if there are any Settlement Agreements associated with this property. Indicate type of agreement and agreement number. Agreement# E] _Deltona Lely Barefoot Beach ❑Port of the Islands Interlocal Route package to: The Conservancy,Attn:Nichole Ryan 1450 Merrihue Dr.,Naples,FL 34102 0 If located in RFMU(Rural Fringe Mixed Use)Receiving Land Areas Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. Lacavera, State of Florida Division of Forestry @ 239-690-3500 for information regarding ' "Wildfire Mitigation&Prevention Plan",LDC Section 2.03.08.A.2.a_(b)i.c. kiPif located within V2 mile of City of Naples, send copy of submittal package to: Robin Singer,Planning Director City of Naples, 295 Riverside Circle, Naples, FL 34102 PLANNER MARK IF NEEDED TO BE ROUTED TO REVIEWERS BELOW: Forward any comments to the assigned planner prior to the due date. _SCHOOL DISTRICT PARKS &REC—Sid Kittila b.,)/4 SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS City of Naples—Robin Singer DR/EM1—EATER.MGMT—Jim You J/4 IMMOKALEE WATER/SEWER Ai/Li Rinteln DISTRICT r - The CONSERVANCY,Nichole Ryan iJf4 Utilities Engineering— x ti:• !ltt' Packet Page -3165- Goer County 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.colliergov.net Fees . Application Fee: (Z.$10,000 (PUD Rezone)+$25 per acre(or fraction of thereof) ❑ $8,000 (PUD to PUD) +$25 per acre(or fraction thereof) • ❑ $6,000 (PUD Amendment)+$25 per acre(or fraction of an acre) i Fire Code Review—New PUD Rezone$150,PUD to PUD Rezone$125, PUD Amendment$125 ,] $2,250.00 Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review ® $500.00 Pre-application fee (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre-app meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre-application meeting will be required. ® $925.00 Legal Advertising Fee for CCPC meeting El $500.00 Legal Advertising Fee for BCC meeting (advertising costs are to be reconciled upon receipt of Invoice from Naples Daily News). - .00 gnviro pact tatemerl $1 000.00 Listed or Protected Species survey review fee(when an EIS is not required) Property Owner Notification fees.-Property Owner Notifications • • • • -- • -•- •-•-- -- ----- • -- $1.50 Non-certified; $3.00 Certified return receipt mail (to be paid after receipt of invoice from Dept. of Zoning&Development Review) Attach a Separate Check for Transportation Fees, (Refer to Exhibit A): $500.00 Methodology Review Fee,if required (?,,k11, 4 et,„,p1,-,e. , ��T "".2 *Additional Fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting ""' �' 32711 Fee Total $ Packet Page-3166- G _Iffgr County 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION! NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 www.cofliergov.net • . PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQWREMENTS L,DC 1O.Q3►O5-•F. • . . • , 'I Applicant must conduct at least one Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) after initial staff review and comment on the application and before the Public Hearing is scheduled with the Planning Commission. Written notice of the meeting shall be sent to all property owners who are required to receive legal notification from the County pursuant to Section 10.03.05.8.8. Notification shall also be sent to property owners, condominium and civic associations whose members are impacted by the proposed land use change and who have formally requested the County to be notified. A copy of the list of all parties noticed, and the date, time, and location of the meeting, must be furnished to the Land Development Services Department and the Office of the Board of County Commissioners no less than ten (10) days prior to the scheduled date of the NIM. • • The applicant must make arrangements for the location of the meeting. The location must be reasonably convenient to those property owners who are required to receive notice and the facilities must be of sufficient size to accommodate expected attendance. The applicant must place an advertisement of the meeting in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear stating the purpose, location, time of the meeting and legible site location map of the property for which the zoning change is being requested. The display advertisement must be one-fourth page, in type no smaller than 12 point and must be placed within a newspaper of general circulation in the County at least seven (7) days prior to,but no sooner than five(5) days before,the NIM. The Collier County staff planner assigned to the project must attend the N1M and shall serve as the facilitator of the meeting; however, the applicant is expected to make a presentation of how it intends to develop the subject property. The applicant is required to audio or video tape the proceedings of the meeting and provide a copy to the Land Development Services Department. As a result of mandated meetings with the public, any commitments made by the applicant shall be reduced to writing and made a part of the record of the proceedings provided to the Land Development Services Department. These written commitments will be made a part of the staff report of the County's review and approval bodies and made a part of the consideration for inclusion in the conditions of approval. - °t-`•• RECORDI G OF DEVELOP {MMMITMENTs:. • • •• Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at its expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in • the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided = : to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said :is -• Memorandum or Notice. • • Packet Page -3167- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. ✓�! 'vk`i NOTES il 1s'45e11'P_. / ,� f %, '('F tl:) .�17 �r c.<J E.tc 1, Li itt4-t 4? ) toil yr'L 1/1 )-7 S 117tf./; r. 1r (� t: i L �;r fi �c i r?°r�i y'f it �: '$) . c, l irI �re-N-`- T f 12 J V i d r_ 4•. -i :, ) Po. .p✓'f'S e ll e Ac 4 °rl 4 5 l en S i S � w/ (2(/6::22e) er/ 2 l_✓9j Ov�� h s S / p ue c{c- ,.47 v ( (e-n/L (0-Drd or) -t�.�i Yn �i /nip/ n hu-t-2 /7-eery tt) L►2) we-/0S` /v5 , Pau de (.5710./. 7 ,l kS c iG7 r-t. Je,- /..(2,c�Y,ie� '(s /✓G<`�� '. ( s (, { s 11 "��StN - "L. L ='001 a" ..eb s r,V� ► ii Cry ► ` 11■. 1 O N■ te=a. . 1� ENG 2-6V. PLZ Pc n 0E S A b wL' &'( 4-v' i`.9,r3 iMI , A .11 _ 1V,• . ' •4 11.11 i l k .,► - 'o{,Gig E e ovri E: .� •ai; • pecT 9 t Td QCC c D „r A - / "`d •1! •_ . 11 AA, 1 • Packet Page-3168- ;a _v I r'I \ I I c ,� c 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. v \4 ‘14. ' N G 0 * 1 - d (� c - LA . ;":1 It j4., :7 e ' c O i. s 3 �� N � tt c t vc' ''' E a G 4 0 o n=. sn is �} t p fvj C'1 i';J tin CL 0 An.•- ....... 4 , . • , - „.„,:,,, Li. 1 n .ct 0 a. v3 o 2 Y /4. � A gat tI) Lu >- 3 e 5 0 N''I k �/( T 11.3 t ,‘,t' --?` V :6 - o �, �� v cc ra IL 7. � � T [\`/JI I N JN cZi i_ ,) k,i =.--"-' r 0 R ce) _ �/ C '� %c Z w r� a , y—Al 3. •1°- • o z z ' o 1 • oc c •a v = l N 4 a t7 . ., < a. r7 ' L C) D.- -,. ..! q c) IL'• Packet Page -3169- 1JGMrr1 ._ 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Property Record 1,1 Sketches I1 Trtm Notic es t at Current Ownership ' Parcel No.1 00288000000 [ Property'Address!!3480 PINE RIDGE RD I 1 Owner Name! FIRST COMMUNITY BANK Addresses I OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA I 1565 RED CEDAR DR City' FORT MYERS State 1 FL 11 Zip] 33907-0 I Legal 1;8 49 26 SE1/4 OF NW1/4 OF I NW1/4,E1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 I OF NW1/4,LESS ORDER OF TAKING DESC IN OR 2660 PG 3364 *For more than four lines of Legal Description please call the Property Appraiser's Office. i ' Section (I Township 1 Range I Acres 1 Map No. 1 Strap No. 18 1 49 1 26 I 13.63 4B18 492618 045.0004818 `J Millage Rates ISub No. L 100 1 ACREAGE HEADER Millage Area School Other 1 Total • '8 Use Code 1 1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 70 5.6990 6.1239 111.8229 *See Instructions for Calculations 2010 Final Tax Roll Latest Sales History (Subject to Change) If all Values shown below equal 0 this ) parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll E Land Value 11 $1,487,757.00 Date Book-Page Amount (+)Improved Value 1 $66,700.00 12/2010 4638-1773 1 $7,045,500.00 1 (=)Market Value $1,554,457.00 1 04/2006 1 4026-2168 1 $8,500,000.001 (-)SOH Exempt Value&Other Exemptions I $0.00 (_)Assessed Value $1,554,457.00 • (-)Homestead and other Exempt Value . I $0.00 (_)Taxable Value ( $1,554,457.00 1(=)School Taxable Value(Used for School Taxes)! $1,554,457.00 SOH="Save Our Homes"exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. • The Information is Updated Weekly. httpJ/www.collierappraiser.com/RecordDl Packet Page 3170-`olioID 0000000288000000 3/9/2011 DeselemKay 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Subject: Pre-App PL-2011-0406(Rezone) Location: Conference Room"C" Start: Thu 3/24/2011 1:30 PM End:. Thu 3/24/2011 2:30 PM Show Time As: Tentative Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Not yet responded Organizer: CDS-C Required Attendees: DeselemKay, Stephanie Karol;AshtonHeidi;AuclairClaudine; BeardLaurie; BradfordAlison; BrethauerPaula; BrownAraqueSummer, CallisCraig; CascioGeorge; DarcoChristopher, GreeneMichael; JarreliPeggy; KurtzGerald; LongoRicco; MartinsPaulo; McClammaJoseph; McKennaJack; PodczerwinskyJohn;ValeraCarolina;WeeksDavid;WileyRobert; WilliamsSteven Rezone Project Description: A rezone from A to CPUD -For property located at 3480 Pine Ridge Road. Existing Application Name: N/A Location: 3480 Pine Ridge RD Naples, FL • Meeting Request PL-2011-0406 Site Received Location.bmp... Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released In response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. • 1 Packet Page-3171- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Dese[emKay From: GMDPortal Sent: Wednesday, March 02,2011 12:06 PM To: BrethauerPaula Subject: Meeting Request Received Paula Brethauer A Portal request has been received for a Meeting. The Hearing Reference Number is: HH20110000172 To view the full details navigate to the hearings sheet under this reference number to view the details of the request. Folowing is the information privided by the portal user: Reference Number: HH20110000172 Project Type: Rezone Project Description: A rezone from A to CPUD for propety located at 3480 Pine Ridge Road. Existing Application Name: N/A Meeting Type: Pre-Application Meeting Preferred Date: Wednesday March 9th or 16th Unavailable Dates: Location: 3480 Pine Ridge RD Naples, FL Full Name: Robert Duane, AICP Email: stephaniekarol(Qlhmeng.com Company Name: Hole Montes, Inc. Representing: First Community Bank of SW Florida Contact Number: Work: 239-254-2018 Please follow up with the applicant to schedule the meeing date and time. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Packet Page-3172- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HoRSwat'HOE DRIVE GRovvTli wIANAGEMENT DIVISiAN! NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)2524400 ?AX (239)252.5724 WWW.GOLLIEttGOV.NET • .^��• ..,1 .�''�,—{.T7•j yl •.�.":..if •�.1T•,1%•I'�—.l '�f,�'��i r'A7¢}"T,n y„=.HI.. .rile 1 , �(' ,��'I'^ A' •`r I'll �,� ! sw qql" .,nni ,.i i.mJ�'. �'h _�c. .��.l i ��rL f rltM�i'�'.1•riP;Lt.k �.. 7•�i.r^ y „.;.f _ tl.; 1 ,ra' ., ,e-ik+,* s. 7 Ir .. ...:'::f........ r�I�fr},�l•r=rer`.a;� '±1 �_.SIYb.rr^ i ...,.� ��' :'�c o. .:�:.....,�, ,— .�e:=,' - • Please complete the'following and fax to the Operations Department at 238252-3774 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Farm must be gianad by Addressing personnel mite to prey avolrstion meeting', please allow 3 days for processtn_o. Not all Items will apply to every project. Items in I orci type are required. I OLiO NUMBERS la PROVIDED. Forms alder than S months will require additional review and approval Y the Addnassing Department. PETITION TYPE(indicate type below,complete a separate Addressing Checklist far each Petition type) ❑ BL(Blasting Permit) 0 SDP(Site Development Plan) ❑ BD(Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA(SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Cirous Permit 0 SDPI(Insubstantial Mange to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP(Site Improvement Plan) [] EXP(Excavation Permit) ❑ SIN(Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP(Final Plat 0 SNR(Street Name Change) ❑ LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) 0 SNO(Street Name Change—Uhplatted) [] PNC(Project Name Change). ❑ YDR(Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL•(Plans&Plat Review) ❑ VA(Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Fiat) ❑ vRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) PUD Rezone ❑ VRS (Vegetation Removal&Site Pill Permit) ❑ RZ(Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties(copy of lengthy description may be attached) SECTION SIB, TOWNSHIP 4RS, RANT;26E S FOLIO (Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach fa, or aesoolafe with, legel dfesorlpfion if mare than one) 00288,000000 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(as applicable,if already assigned) 3480 PINE RIDGE ROAD • LOCATION MAP must be EittechedishowIng exact location of project/site in relation to nearest pdblic road right- of-way • SURVEY(csypy -needed only fort unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME(if applicable) • PROPOSED an KEET NAMES(f applicable) - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMEkER(forexistng prof a4sifes only) SDP or AIR • .1.:._.,•y:�.. ....1:.,••+?fill•'. Packet Page-3173- I CO .�, f 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. COLLIER COutM 1Y C OVE 1M Nr 28110 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIONI NAPLES,FORMA. 34144 PLANNING AND R GULATIOH (239)252-24010 FAX (Z3 )2324724 WWW.COLLIERGOV..NELT Project of development names proposed far,or already appeasing in.Dandaminium documanta Of application; indicate whether proposed or exiting) Imierreessemeammeemeati o Plus O-eck Or .El CflEAORIM Is to be Faxed back I] Personally Picked Up APPLICANT NAME: BOB DUANE, AICPIHOLE MONIES, INC; PHONE 239-254-2018 FAX 239-254-2099 S gnature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approve! and is subject to further review by the Operations Department, FOR STAFF USE ONLY FIX Number(Primary) Q O Z-c g 0000 0 0 Fano Number Folio Number Folio Number Updated by: rime; IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST RE UF* ATEo OR NEW row SUBMITTED • `c; _.; '' 2t'Lrl Packet Page-3174- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TRTRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR BRYNWOOD CENTER CPTTD PROJECT NO. F1103.04 PREPARED BY: • TR Transportation Consultants,Inc. 2726 Oak Ridge Court,Suite 503 Fort Myers,Florida 33901-9356 (239)278-3090 April 25,2011 Packet Page-3175- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TR. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. EXISTING CONDITIONS III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IV. TRIP GENERATION V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS VII. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY AND IMPROVEMENTS VIII. CONCLUSION Packet Page -3176- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. I. INTRODUCTION TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. has conducted a traffic impact statement for the proposed re-zoning application for the Brynwood Center CPUD located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road east of Livingston Road in Collier County, Florida. This report has been completed in compliance with the guidelines established by the Collier County Transportation Planning Division for developments seeking Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) approval. The approximate location of the subject site is illustrated on Figure 1. As currently proposed, the subject site could be developed with up to 25,000 square feet of retail uses and up to 120,000 square feet of office uses. Access to the subject site will be provided directly to Pine Ridge Road via a right-in/right-out only access drive. Cross- access to the neighboring properties to the east and west will also be provided,permitting access to Livingston Road,Kraft Road, and Whippoorwill Lane. A methodology meeting was held with Collier County Staff on March 22n1, 2011 to discuss the proposed re-zoning application. Copies of the initial meeting checklist and methodology notes are attached to the end of this document for reference. This report examines the impact of the development on the surrounding roadways. Trip generation and assignments to the site access driveways will be completed and analysis conducted to determine the impacts of the development on the surrounding intersections. Page 1 Packet Page-3177- • 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. - - .n o y�i •..�errlcn a° _:_:_t...r---- -Alt_y-• lras _ I D oto r DS•> �G re y 1Y"y- k �0o°c a glee 1, ,' N a b� i Cj. . t. I- o,_ j' '`_S VINEYARDS '7' ` /• II '--- El.e on 4-- L J� �� K.:" �`I VV �� i Pgy ' I` - ti. �, Ila Walk Ir I o som I. () J.IeX-Cir ,•„___- Daniels Rd .__._.:I,D EL,�� I ' p�• • II WALDEN 1 (n Jai, ' OAKS ra 01-41 r p m 5 r' ., A _1� -Y,. Hunters Rd ._.�--�._.-'' rhof Naples ds Te fa iln n °` �._.., - }- © or Ir: T T rel' r H 4,, . Sonne Sonam? Gr Sa dahvood L 6e- Vo . ESI d 1\ `�• _i -- -._ Sahle.R. P.An....--- ...�_...__...--._..._. . 1 _... c' LIVINGSTON aOa �y�bQ90 Altiiraden Dr a° WOODS t. 'ti i: Af9aZlj'� la Ot S M BARRON G, o COLLIER � �' J'Pd�.d �8¢I¢J HIGH SCHOOL - •.,•___,-_•Bottlebrush Ln - �\ c -, �-„ .v�J,• ri NEW I �.. A a° C / • .:9 Dr _ Grand © REGIAIN CINGS oyaC 'j-RAJ fir/--c",a:e CI; Palm Dr 1 Pine I a slyJ".� Jame.ori Cr u 11 tEl ___ v EM1!sdmy __Livingston __-_--_ m CROSSRO\ 5 • l4CA`' Cl a. z PLAZA t 107 618 KensingtoQ_°-_•_••High o ! m_t NG• PL i Cf g ° r ir..., 'PCc' J �l_.� 1 oil]Ay____SW ,t o s1 iii PLAZA -. 7. — 1 .e PROJECT JECT S 5 1........inalii ' G . 3 Fh ...„,..1§ awk Dr. a enkac ti o o ct\ OA- so Kens,n td( ;, ._.l4lhAVsW._._..__._ rz� good hlida 8 Golf&- St:Rarnabas a -..-. .... .._..-.__ . (..PI ■ Country v C1 / Gan me.e Club E , ►�- - /- J. c High sa, e .j irr p ci • c rn 1 75' , t4) • RL NIS o(.."of t.. KQ LLYlck ' tin .• .......tl .°.a._.. .iA ® :: T£RI- . nsrngton - -O A/c Dr j /�� I — 18111 Av_SW .,.-__.. ..Cedar Tree Ln f Ff�a-`� 5 J _ 4 N N ,.. v �° r �� -__ .y" Grey d.S� °I �°1 ■ _ .._ f • r a,.. m� 5-' _ ..z.__-_- I WyndemereWy 54�icebush.i `� fc�� 1. a r `•- _ —Flar€staPi '" i� i 20thAv5W_.__.--- .___ Wetl�ortln r. In �" .1L�.- a— C DeMER N'c a?)5A` t�� _ 1.�cao _ R. j� �wa er 0a � 4 �°� '� I, � Grey Oaks ..,... = _ c2. 51 ;rP OCountry ' l _` -—� � - _J wl 22nd Ay SW __ _____._..____.SeaGrassLn___. • Club APS --ii .-:-__--65-:%t_ Wyndemere �;rTJt '.y.11 TY/ir Stp 3).•;er1 Sr �A;"/ ." -W-S'{ro Li Club 2 Kul , .G\ -% = - �, 241hAv SW Slav Grass In ....) 40k,, -R TRANSPORTATION PROJECT LOCATION MAP CONSULTANTS, INC. BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD Figure 1 Packet Page-3178- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site is currently vacant. The site is bordered to the north by Pine Ridge Road and the North Naples Fire Station. To the south of the subject site is existing residential development. To the east of the subject site is the currently vacant Pine Ridge Center West CPUD and to the west of the subject site is Marquesa Plaza. Pine Ride Road is an east/west six-lane divided arterial roadway that borders the subject site to the north. Pine Ridge Road operates under signalized traffic control at its intersections with Livingston Road and Whippoorwill Lane. The Level of Service Standard on Pine Ridge Road between Airport Road and I-75 is LOS "E", or 3,730 vehicles. Pine Ridge Road has a posted speed limit of 45 mph in the vicinity of the subject site and is under the jurisdiction of the Collier County Departalent of Transportation. Livingston Road is a north/south six-lane divided arterial roadway to the west of the subject site. The Level of Service Standard on Livingston Road between Vanderbile Beach Road and Golden Gate Parkway is LOS "E", or 3,800 vehicles. Livingston Road has a posted speed limit of 45 mph in the vicinity of the subject site and is under the jurisdiction of the Collier County Department of Transportation. Traffic data was collected along Pine Ridge Road at its intersections with Livingston Road and Whippoorwill Lane in March 2011. The turning movement count data is included in the Appendix of this report for reference. Based upon data obtained from the 2009 Florida Traffic Information CD for Collier County the turning movement count was performed during peak season, therefore, no peak season adjustment was applied to the traffic data. Figure 2 illustrates the current 2011 peak hour peak season turning volumes at each intersection. Page 3 Packet Page-3179- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. N / W �� E N.T.S. 0 z O 1-- u) 0 • z M > l% c=c0 0 CO t. �c— •131 97) coo N 4171,485 2(1,108) rn u�4 -4--2,052 (1,286) r + `, c 312(203) PINE RIDGE ROAD 4/ + '139 (147) (234) 1401'h +f / I (1668731\ + f' eo 2 (1,697)700♦ m (2,188)314 135 N_ co Nri(351) 153 0 co N CEO o�0 Y � 04 CO 0 0 a LEGEND t--000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4-(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC - INDICATES LESS THAN 5 TRIPS • 2011 PEAK HOUR PEAK SEASON T1 TRANSPORTATION TURNING VOLUMES CONSULTANTS, INC. BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD Figure 2 Packet Page -3180- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT As currently proposed, the subject site could be developed with up to 25,000 square feet of retail uses and up to 120,000 square feet of office uses. Up to half of the 120,000 square feet of office uses could be developed as medical office. Therefore, for the purposes of this analysis it was assumed that the subject site would be developed with 25,000 square feet of retail uses, 60,000 square feet of medical office uses, and 60,000 square feet of general office uses. Table 1 summarizes the land uses proposed on the subject site that will be utilized for the trip generation purposes of this analysis. Table 1 • Proposed Land Use Br i wood Center CPUD ida�i.i 'wT� �p:Ce'n�#r�c q V `� 3y r.:�v ,,` ,` FY.V �°Sv ',K.t,"�-:Tim SIE , i,o1 iatta lta • Shopping Center 25,000 square feet (LUC 820) Medical Office Building 60,000 square feet (LUC 720) • General Office Building 60,000 square feet - (LUC 710) Access to the subject site will be provided directly to Pine Ridge Road via a right- in/right-out only access drive. Cross-access to the neighboring properties to the east and west will also be provided, permitting access to Livingston Road, Kraft Road, and Whippoorwill Lane. Page 5 Packet Page -3181- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. fRTRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. IV. TRIP GENERATION The trip generation for the proposed development was determined by referencing the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) report, titled Trip Generation, 8th Edition. Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center) was utilized for the trip generation pm-poses of the retail uses being proposed on the subject site. Land Use Code 720 (Medical-Dental Office Building) was utilized for the trip generation purposes of the medical office uses proposed on the subject site. Land Use Code 710 (General Office Building) was utilized for the trip generation purposes of the general office uses proposed on the subject site. The trip generation equations for the aforementioned land uses are included in the Appendix of this report for reference. Table 2 outlines the anticipated weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hour trip generation of the Brynwood Center CPUD as currently proposed. The daily trip generation is also indicated in the table. Table 2 Trip Generation Brynwood Center CPUD � M A N I r z j n f l$ SI ONf a.•� 'n NWt O p}R v Mi a 3. N4 � : eragi Y wd m a r ,p $ y + wa sumo L ° s k aer>tweglai 1 zr1 s-,�'rJra'ti� Atlr Shopping Center 41 27 68 123 128 251 2,758 (25,000 square feet) Medical Office 109 29 138 49 131 180 2,238 (60,000 square feet) General Office 110 15 125 25 121 146 900 (60,000 square feet) Total Tri•s 260 71 331 197 380 577 5,896 Not all of the trips generated by the proposed development will utilize the public roadway system. Some of the trips will travel to/from the land uses located within the proposed development. Utilizing the methodologies presented in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, dated June 2004, an internal capture rate of 2.1%percent was calculated. The summary sheet utilized to calculate this internal capture rate is included in the Appendix Page 6 Packet Page -3182- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. of this report for reference. Table 3 indicates the total external trips that will access the proposed development. Table 3 External Trip Generation g _ B wood Center CPUD � '.�:'�: ","1'�•`.' ��t ti � Nina a o a � �paiL , . a %a g�!al Total Trips 260 71 331 197 380 577 5,896 Less 2.1%Internal Capture -5 -2 -7 -4 -8 -12 -124 Total External Trips 255 69 324 193 372 565 5,772 The trips indicated for the uses in Table 3 will not entirely be new trips to the adjacent roadway system. Vehicles already traveling the adjoining roadway system, called "pass- by" traffic,reduce the development's overall impact on the surrounding roadway system but do not decrease the actual driveway volumes. ITE estimates that a shopping center of comparable size may attract as much as 10 to 90 percent of its traffic from vehicles already traveling the adjoining roadway system. From the ITE Trip Generation report, the relationship between the percent pass-by and the size of the development for Land Use Code 820 is: Ln(T)=-0.29 Ln(X)+5.00 T=Percent pass-by traffic X=1,000's of square feet GLA of the retail portion of the development Therefore, the percent pass-by for this development was calculated as follows: Ln(T)_-0.29 Ln(25)+5.00 T= 58% However, pursuant to the Collier County TIS guidelines a maximum pass-by rate of twenty-five percent (25%) is permitted for Land Use Code 820 (Shopping Center). Therefore, a twenty-five percent (25%)pass-by rate was utilized for Land Use Code 820. Page 7 Packet Page -3183- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TRTRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. For this analysis, the "pass-by" traffic was accounted for to determine the number of . "new" trips the development will add to the surrounding roadways. Table 4 summarizes the "pass-by" trips reduction factors for the development. Table 5 summarizes the development traffic and the breakdown between the new trips the development is anticipated to generate and the "pass-by" trips the development is anticipated to attract. It should be noted that the driveway volumes are not reduced as a result of the"pass-by" reduction, only the traffic added to the surrounding streets and intersections. Table 4 "Pass-by"Trip Reduction Factors ;Brynwood Center CPUD VI t[i�F�'�s�} Mait*� a Js > .t t rtaT7 o e g @t s ' e 8t 41 .R e Shopping Center 25% (LUC 820) Table 5 New,External Trip Generation Brynwood Center CPUD _ �'��•A ��i:�.¢ �:.xw �7��i?� n . � �,� ''y r}`. U��'�,,`y�f^ wv�7' �T.F i�""�r' �''� F=„?"'!+'ut�7 .ryg�v4a"� v gin. T �a M� "'7'J y p i m S i i 4u.� ,6. Z�!6 T i`r ? ° ile sir��0.��t�.,,u-� �� !sa yr rx�,�,�t F� x E.e �i � �e1 °o `]t�€".sg�,�,see�d � ' �8'�4,f o R �. ,<F'yn� '�? **, to {q6° I r re's 5;81 •a - i� {'4 a� iSSS 9ru,e�r d ti+' i I d 1fr sills c"� �`aiE7a r. r1 '�i'91isS'{d r a)`.k Total External Trips 255 ' 69 324 193 _ 372 565 5,772. , External Retail Trips 40 26 66 120 125 245 2,700 (Less 2.1%Internal Capture) Less 25%Pass-by -10 -7 -17 -30 -31 -61 -675 ' New, External Trips 245 62 307 163 341 504 5,097 . Page 8 Packet Page-3184- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The trips the proposed development is anticipated to generate were assigned to the site access drives and the surrounding roadway network. The project traffic distribution was determined in the methodology with staff and is illustrated on Figure 3. Figure 4 illustrates the assigmnent of the total project trips to the surrounding intersections based upon the project traffic distribution illustrated on Figure 3. VI. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In order to determine which roadway segments surrounding the site will be significantly impacted, Table 1A, contained in the Appendix,was created. This table indicates which roadway links will accommodate an amount of project traffic greater than the 2%-2%-3% Significance Test. Therefore, the net new traffic (after a reduction for pass-by) generated as a result of the proposed development was compared with the Capacity for Peak Hour— Peak Direction traffic conditions as defined by the 2010 Collier County Annual Update Inventory Report(AUIR). In addition to the significant impact criteria, Table 1 also includes the concurrency analysis on the Collier County Roadway network. The current remaining capacity and Level of Service Standard for each roadway segment analyzed was obtained from the 2010 Collier County Annual Inventory Update Report (AUIR). In order to estimate the projected 2017 background traffic volumes, the existing 2010 peak hour peak direction traffic volumes from the 2010 AUIR were adjusted by the appropriate growth rate. The growth rates calculated for each roadway link are indicated on Table 3A. These projected volumes were then compared with the 2010 existing plus trip bank volumes from the 2010 AUIR. The more conservative of the two volumes was then utilized as the 2017 background traffic volume. Page 9 Packet Page-3185- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. N W —.., - E S N.T.S. 0 4 ° Z 0 + ~ o z i-40%-► 4-350/0-16- /— PINE RIDGE ROAD II° ct 0 0 LEGEND *-20% *PERCENT DISTRIBUTION "Tz TRANSPORTATION PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION CONSULTANTS,INC. BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD Figure 3 Packet Page -3186- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. • ( w = 7 co 0) Z A.`. �, z ass- '.o(o) LL i �� z o 0 4-0(0) 4/ 4 \ c0(0) I 3NV1 11IM2i00ddIHM (0)oJ414),+ !* (0)0-® cv N° (0)0 0,-3.2..6-2, r r Q Q O ce w 0 0 E2 w Z _ U U_ I- a _ E,. LL W= N H H � 20 a. me ♦ 001 OW �+ y `0 (0) ❑`dOZ! o W ¢ (f) W Z q ♦ lJd�l>i w Z u0_ a. I Q U - wQ � o w 0 N W< < w LL.0 W W o U oo~ }- 51 (278 000z I—(Z �n �► 1 I (/) CO vml'v o I I Nd iii 4, pc ,+, Y k0(0) `ter`'\ 1.� 10 \ 1... ____ ___J co- co 1 M o 4-4(19) IZ23(18) 7 10 (7) z Z 4i 4 r 14 (75) 14-23 (98) 4/ 4-28 (11) O F- Od02i NOlSDNIAII (17)231 (66)23-► (10) 131 i vCD'-'' z Z g 0 I-U 1 FCC Packet Page-3187- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TiTRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. The concurrency analysis was performed by subtracting the project traffic volumes from the 2017 background remaining capacity in order to determine whether or not sufficient capacity will be available after the addition of the net new traffic associated with the proposed Brynwood Center CPUD. Based on the information contained within Table 1A, there will be sufficient capacity on the surrounding roadway network to serve the net new trips generated as a result of the proposed development. VII. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY AND IMPROVEMENTS Based upon the information contained within Table 1A, all roadway segments anticipated to be significantly impacted by the proposed development are shown to have sufficient capacity under the projected 2017 traffic conditions to accommodate the proposed development. Figure 5 indicates the capacity conditions on all significantly impacted roadway links based upon the existing conditions, the projected 2017 conditions without the proposed development, and the projected 2017 conditions with the proposed development. Figure 6 illustrates the projected 2017 background traffic volumes at the site access locations and significantly impacted intersections. The projected 2017 background traffic volumes were calculated by growing the existing 2011 peak hour peak direction traffic volumes by the appropriate growth rates. The projected 2017 build-out traffic volumes were then calculated by adding the site traffic assignment to the projected 2017 background traffic volumes. The projected 2017 build-out traffic volumes are illustrated on Figure 7. Page 12 Packet Page -3188- I 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. c.-----,..............---------.....----------____ In W L 00 r 0) Z ,a,..-- 0 1 (L IN Z \*.., C :IV/Gina] NVEO1 - '-5o 0 0 to vt,CO...N. H 0 0 7- Z' O CC a. z U) z 0 N N c 0 r �' NO Q N CO 00 .6 F Q z a W{9 000 0---------11.-. q O_ W � < 0. 00Z U_W z zz Ua °- 0 Li-~ EL CO zr- � w �'W V-) CO � N.. � RNV1 11IM2J00ddIHM W Z U U � _U ¢ QI- coco�c`fi` < QQQ o WOOD F' O F- Z_ Z_ 1- O OVOH ZZzO O > 0 co c�"o ,_Lc 1dd2__, cC 2 2 O o Z 0CCa aa.. J aVO21 NOISONIN7 0 0 0 0000 COCA 0000 Is'. O N o N [-\-1''d' '. C? CO CO CO co s- O v-- O Lo 0 -=- �� NNNnj co N. 0 up CD c CI) abo2j ONn1nd 12J0d2iIV Z Z / / / ¢ z O o co D o o) o Z Q Z N c O N F--V Packet Page -3189- _ 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. I N W E N.T,S. a z O F- O z o J Lt.. co co O) �E. v co �n cO 130 (253) o o 4-2,311 148 (109) �) N ♦1,672 (1,248) l� u) 17(166)48) ,f + % 4-351 (229) PINE RIDGE ROAD 44 + 'r (264 158 ► 'l + t / I (187)821 h 4 � (1,911)788-► O rn ' (2,464) 971♦ ^� (395) 172N_ -� (354) 152.v. CD COvN p co Mtio I � O � N Aolw • I z J_ O 0 0- Q LEGEND ♦000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4-(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC - INDICATES LESS THAN 5 TRIPS -R PROJECTED 2017 BACKGROUND TRANSPORTATION TURNING VOLUMES CONSULTANTS,INC. BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD Figure 6 Packet Page-3190- i I 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. r N W ` E S N.T.S. 0 0 a! z O t-- o) CD 8 o J C73"Ei PINE RIDGE ROAD co aLoo tirn N•148(109) -7; • 133(271) 42,400(1,516) tit ,-1,686(1,322) 1 1, c157 (166) 1, 361 (285) 44-2,180(1,878) r `► !) Y (2,461) 1,1Q'L *i1 fP (148)27t (264) 158 /41 (136,181 J (1,980)880-0. v r 2 (187) 82 m o°° (403) 182 ( ,594) 995-* oz-;N 0 (354) 152. c N. I� O 11.1 J 0 0 0 a, • LEGEND ♦000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC *-(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC - INDICATES LESS THAN 5 TRIPS • PROJECTED 2017 BACKGROUND TzTRANSPORTATION + PROJECT TURNING VOLUMES CONSULTANTS,INC. BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD Figure 7 Packet Page-3191- • 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TRTRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. A preliminary turn lane analysis was conducted at the proposed site access drive on Pine Ridge Road. Based upon the results of the analysis an eastbound right turn lane will be warranted. The eastbound right turn lane should be constructed to include 240 feet of taper/deceleration length according to the Florida Department of Transportation Standard Index #301 based upon a 50 mph design speed and an urban cross-section. No storage length is warranted as the eastbound right turning movement will operate under free-flow traffic conditions. Intersection analysis was performed at the Pine Ridge Road/Livingston Road and Pine Ridge Road/Whippoorwill Lane intersections as well as at the proposed site access drive on Pine Ridge Road based upon the projected 2017 traffic conditions both with and without the proposed development. The latest version of the Highway Capacity Software, HCS+, and the SYNCHRO software were utilized to conduct the intersection analysis. Table 7 provides a summary of the results of the intersection analysis. ow Table 7 • Intersection Analysis Summary F nwood Center CPUD R�ls x+�,, �. �,.i shiy��t'fi��,c�i,��?'��.[a�J i ��r�ttartarirn 't r��is �'�c-rtir{o 1� �,i �' 3 1 P U s h �A t t rah n ..rata ,Orata 1 �2 � phi`"7�lSIL:}' 7 1 , i' i..o i6 ��li�i6fd5�S.p7�l�'�a' i i r !� t� � °.'v:ul +f"f� 5'F-aArllH'}jj�j��e��... '� -3.. i e S 1 1 t V� Y h A4�E� -.}n � �/+\7 Lh4��- �� • .�3r.-suw�� ® ��'�}'.. t 1 Cw wa..r 41V Rirt t✓•�i 1 .tAe 3� 01.4 4 A-$ ,p r .£(s V F! :' 1+�� y?l{y)nfi ez '1 �i�yi. flI'n'ib+. L ♦m `F.n Z�p }� Ik�t81�,eGt10 ri 5.,2!C<��0�1 1 S � �+ulf'+�ut `4n 3 Sri e�a a�J '�� (,41 e''�i�`x'�}+CSt'[ii'(!el•1P �•,�U ,of K'. vAS'a'"s t, AM Background D D _ E E 56.3 E Pine Ridge Rd. & PM Background D D E E 52.1 D Livingston Rd. AM Build-Out E D E E 57.4 E PM Build-Out E D E E 55.6 E AM Background C D D D 38.3 D Pine Ridge Rd. & PM Background D D E E 48.9 D Whippoorwill Ln. AM Build-Out C D D D 43.5 D PM Build-Out E_ D E E 59.4 • E Pine Ridge Rd. & AM Build-Out -- -- B -- 11.5 B Site Access _ PM Build-Out -- -- F -- 86.5 F ! *Major approach Delay/LOS reported for all TWSC intersections. Page 16 Packet Page-3192- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Based on the results of the analysis at the Pine Ridge Road/Livingston Road and Pine Ridge Road/Whippoorwill Lane intersections are shown to operate at an acceptable Level of Service condition in 2017 both with and without the proposed development. l3ased upon the results of the analysis at the site access intersection on Pine Ridge Road, the northbound right turning movement is shown to operate below acceptable Level of Service conditions. However, it is anticipated that there will be sufficient gaps in eastbound traffic created by the traffic signal at Pine Ridge Road/Livingston Road to accommodate the project traffic exiting the site. Operations at the proposed site access drive on Pine Ridge Road will be further analyzed during the Site Development Plan (SDP) review process. VIII. CONCLUSION The Brynwood Center CPUD located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road east of Livingston Road in Collier County,Florida. As currently proposed,the subject site could be developed with up to 25,000 square feet of retail uses and up to 120,000 square feet of office uses. Based on the Concurrency Analysis conducted as a part of this report, all roadway segments anticipated to be significantly impacted by the proposed development are shown to have sufficient capacity under the projected 2017 traffic conditions to accommodate the proposed development. Based upon a preliminary turn lane analysis, an eastbound right turn lane approximately 240 feet in overall length will likely be warranted at the proposed site access drive on Pine Ridge Road. Intersection analysis was performed at the Pine Ridge Road/Livingston Road and Pine Ridge Road/Whippoorwill Lane intersections as well as at the proposed site access drive on Pine Ridge Road based upon the projected 2017 traffic conditions both with and without the proposed development. Based on the results of the analysis at the Pine Ridge Road/Livingston Road and Pine Ridge Road/Whippoorwill Lane intersections are shown to operate at an acceptable Level of Service condition in 2017 both with and without the proposed development. Based upon the results of the analysis at the site access Page 17 Packet Page -3193- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TRTRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. intersection on Pine Ridge Road, the northbound right turning movement is shown to operate below acceptable Level of Service conditions. However, it is anticipated that there will be sufficient gaps in eastbound traffic created by the traffic signal at Pine Ridge Road/Livingston Road to accommodate the project traffic exiting the site. Operations at the proposed site access drive on Pine Ridge Road will be further analyzed during the Site Development Plan(SDP)review process. oak K:\2011\03 March\04 Brynwood Center\4-5-2011.Report.doc Page 18 Packet Page-3194- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. APPENDIX Packet Page-3195- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. METHODOLOGY MEETING NOTES Packet Page-3196- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST, Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: March 22nd,2011 Time: 9:00 A.M. Location: Growth Management Division, Conference Room 607 People Attending: Name,Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) David Wheeler,TR Transportation Consultants,Inc., (239)278-3090 2) John Podczerwinsky, Collier County Transportation, (239)252-5890 3) George Herznanson,P.E.,Hole Montes,Inc., (239)254-2000 4) 5) Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title:David Wheeler,Project Consultant Organization:TR Transportation Consultants,Inc. Address &Telephone Number: (239)278-3090 2726 Oak Ridge Court, Suite 503 Fort Myers,FL 33901 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name&Title: John Podczerwinsky,Development Review Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning Department Reviewer's Name&Title: Organization&Telephone Number: Applicant:_ Applicant's Name:Hole Montes,Inc. Address: 6200 Whiskey Creek•Drive,Fort Myers,FL 33919 Telephone Number: (239) 254-2000 Proposed Development: Name: Brynwood Center CPUD Location: 3480 Pine Ridge Road,Naples,FL 34105 Land Use Type: Commercial retail and offices uses ITE Code#: LUC 820—Shopping Center,LUC 710 General Office Building, & • LUC 720—Medical-Dental Office Building Proposed number of development emits: 25,000 square feet of retail uses and 120,000 square feet of offices uses up to half of which could be medical office CA Documents and Sollingsld6ADesktop\Brynwood Center CPUD Malhodologydoc Packet Page -3197- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Other: Description: Zoning Existing: Comprehensive plan recommendation:N/A Requested: Commercial Findings of the Preliminary Study: Project is anticipated to generate more than 300 trips. See the attached trip generation table. Study Type: Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Major TIS IZI Study Area: Boundaries: Based upon 2%-2%-3% Significant Impact Criteria Additional intersections to be analyzed: Pine Ridge Rd @ Livingston Rd & Pine Ridge Rd(a7 Whippoorwill Ln 00-re- $oti-F ate.- pN Horizon Year(s): 2016 -(I -SAA 5� i A" L)( 1 Analysis Time Period(s):A.M. and P.M.Peak Hour 17_& E \ Future Off-Site Developments: ` • • •--1`'tA-1 1.- Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation 8th Edition M `.�� ` Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None: � (0 AO Pass-by trips: ITE& Collier County`Guidelines-(2.4) roa) 544 S Internal trips (PUD): TTE Transmit use: 1,. 1101c._ 67 L. Other: • Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 1--75 -4 None SVC. VOL_ 37.16 • zo, "q k- Y 2 66 Methodology&Assumptions: Z)l TV () $A`L�-= Z Non-site traffic estimates: 2010 AUIR 1-0-i AL. 34)82._. Site-trip generation: ITE Trip Generation 8th Edition LUC 820. LUC 710, &LUC 720 © Trip distribution method:By Hand ry�, ,, �A (a D Traffic assigmnent method:By Hand 06 10 '�`" 1N�N ZOO L-* C:IDocuments and Salting sldlwtDesktoptBryrnrood CanterCPDD Methodology doe 14 T G -Cc Ni A (@_ . o7f, tfi zoo 40; Packet Page-3198- i I 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Traffic growth rate: From comparisons of the 2006 &2010 AUIR's Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accid: , locations: Sight dist., ce: Queuing: \(\i /A--- Access location&configur. 'on: Traffic control: Signal system lo .tio• t progression needs: On-site parking news: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access po 'cy and jurisdiction: Review • ocess: Require. ents: Miscel aneous: • SIGN TURFS / - ck..------, Study repare . /..■ -‘ iewers Applicant C:1Dncuments end SoflogsldleADesldopIBrynwood Confer CPUD Melhodology.doc Packet Page-3199- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Trip Generation Brynwood Center CPUD f 7,+}Sll}{ `� NL Z'�6t , tY r p G E" N i,`i o O } W*. SvT'`#4,; 4-`4:f Y,daif n — B� �P7!--� f a - e a - 1 , 1 ,? ... '�� '�9r n�E / 1 � kiti J�,t w�59 `-�—� ',1'14/i ,-fit` v s.am -u a �5 �a �._�'J'�'n �. y -�, Ivt . .,'; G�.Jf.;Y�6:�F 1;1k ," �'11`"f O .i- .!:$1 6.1... S�+pAI:[Q,' �e r,,fr* � 0,I .434 rl a�,,--„'._,a4 ' Shopping Center 41 . 27 68 123 128 251 2,758 (25,000 square feet) General Office 110 15 125 25 121 146 900 (60,000 square feet) Medical Office 109 29 138 49 131 180 2,238 (60,000 square feet) I Total Trips 260 71 331 197 380 577 5,896 • • • Packet Page-3200- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. t,•,‘„,....,&-- -,,,,,,,p....*.,„-,,re.,ATI4.',..57-----,ii „,.....-T-ii,,,i,„t„,, , ,,, -;t ,,...„:„:„.i.•:„cf„,•,.,..,.......Ti,,,,,„.1.,;*•-•„,,,,,,,,,,,t-,4-5„w4,,,,i,,.z.,::29.,,,..,i1„.s.,,:,;.4.,-.;,,,,,-,?,,FiLiffoliv,.,,K-g,,z..,;..=.;,c„..,,,,-14-7.;#. 14-4.._ - "" i: I„. ,11..,,,,,,e, ,: ,.._. „, ..44....si',,: 1W.,.4,,,....• ,...;,3A4 g,41,,,'p,'..'4,1•„:,...;,,,,..7.1.,.. ",,,,..p.,-,....1,...4,1,4-4,,....a,..et, A.,„,3-.11....,,,I,...,,4.4,•„„,.•., 0.-..._,i,,,,,,.. .i,,pe..i._ _ p.-.1.1,4,..6..;, ' 'ej, , '..t'.1.".".'',.'fr'..,!,.::•t ''.;111- 1,1;71', :::!:‘.`:,:•:"...'1.+V.C.I.t: ;.'''!,i■X'11'1'7.'ir'€.'''':.1...2?..01-,4.4Willt%-3,V??W-4,1■Vegtflinf4r#V1-4 ii :1';:N '1'., ':%'"1$r9i."L"---'4"°:''- •V, --"--"'-'-',. '''."--:'''•'''l':1•••'''24'-'':'-•'''!'' -V.".-'8':-',....-',.:••..-,':04.114'1''•■•''''+-','24...r1h,t'.;e'....'''crti5...,4;fry. ,:17..-,...;_c;„- Veiz.k-i,ge,,..=,v.:.;wk■AF,,C=3...?"4, Tic',*,. ...i' ".'-..1:: ..'; 11-.'.C.16 ;)R7:-.','' ,4 ..r#-.'-23'.41:. -‘4=11-01-1V--'4;A .AC4 1.,'. lets....R,tif,,,:,V\1=P '.:`).''..,.' ,:....,.:e).....:.$-.-ft.14!`-.t..et,...cl'i.!•:,-.;:wn.4.4.,77101;.-4..,•:,.. ...f.ri *-,r p,-,,-4,,,,.;,,t,,etla,14Lzi,2 ;1,1,,,,, At, ,c,-,kof: --.,- ,:4 s. *:,,,,p44.1.,...,,, • ,. 4,.-,...„-,--'_:-A,,,•!•,.;-•;•1...,...,,,,,,,..--,,,:i.,:,4,...JFe.-4,,,,y,,,,,,,..;•,?..!,,,-‘,7,4-.1„1,..n.ik mt: ,,-;1;12,;•: f.:1•.fitalr_4,,VPIPPri.;14V.4 I',:Y*,1,454,147 VQ",.. ‘sig-.I73'4Ir IV''.,,-'= ••ii07.7v741,41 ,,'..ii.,:p.•;-.4,•i•,--.f14,..,:-,:i..::.,:3,:•,-- • •:,.;:b1;60,4•.J,ii!, ;'49,.ti,,o.,:il.:, lsc-...vx3.,,,,--;t1t:.--4..„:t2),y.p:;Azik,-Ak..fr,,4p,•,, \ , ,•ht4t4,_.?-4:4 11 T.fi•I',',4,-, z•V•if.i,:c" ,:t.,c,.:A.:-.4,•,:,,,,:.!:::-.k.wti',,.,..,:iw.,:03,1:15,1P-"44?,air'"11,): •=•,-,)5ft ''' fqT4.V.ivz-L.?..14040.ilq.. -' 24,, --. ilig,,frfr.•..7, vr..-, 1., 10'4-a:,:i•-k,:.4.:_,,1*...i.o.:41,k-4-..:f::,?:-,E-7:::1.1...,...,.:v.,t4;,c.p•-d tlIcilvpaii•u ,A,,:„.17,4,,,,,,,:„, ,_iiy,„ ,v.,,,.7,.. ..,,goio,,,4; ,./..--.., 7.,,f ,,I..-',1-4-•ctip,-,...4,\'. '.2-n$R,-.,-,w,,...,.•144.,,ytis.,.;,:i-,c.-.1v-,,,,:.;41,,;:t1 §_-.3-,i.r.,.;,.-44.4WOW .,,,i, 'f,_4'4FrA. wi'i‘N 177",•-AV,21;44,11q4.0 :•••.,..•••-. -.5:::'..*&;:71'' 410-4.-tt`'V.• 't.1-g- 4-..=4:1' !V''.:J:7.tl'P'.;.11`.!11.1-KiMatM";'1,445,z414.. -*--;,-,% ,-;10.2.,g,%, :1,4.TiiT-Ltzcgl-ii4,,r•-.ti-A r .....„.......,..,....:1.,,... .... ,. ...1:4,,i:::;.4,V\ r.ji-Vi*7,-'i3104!.: •et.i.W. .--,,,, ,V.I,D ;'.j.-"1.,t:4;tri',...tgl'a4.0;','',.`47),-01A 4t1.4 ,n.'1'%,. ‘-.:',Ar', 4";:t,t,q,<Y,WiliO,*le_ • .31,,',.'3',. ,y.1;.Y44-2-3.?..!,,,_,,.-,, -%4;;._ .-', -1.,4tkA4,,,:0;,t:'. ..".ffi.13, ) ‘1-q1,;A,:!;13".V.• ,-.34,V.04,1 algiel.- .4-.414-1',1-4- f'.-4,-- ttz-;A5,54'.,..;,:,:-.c' i '1:-:>•.,,,Jr.,-.C.'-1,19 .•'‘'E 1 l'• e-,Nt-4., '"..F.',V11,--&=4- ....7.:;,.. %-_,9 0. .._4:12.-::.r. ....ti; ....igt,:,,,-.4._ -'4,;,-..-4:::174 .4r.AP-+,..54,, -.1t!--•.--:"'12:27:1:-'.z,;_-, 1-.1... '. •,1-..g'...c:or.:.•;.:,,,-.4i• -14,.('il 11 ..,i,"`,1,-;0„ tn-4:-,..,J,..*,---:*,;-:-..-:-.1z-,-- ---,,---.----'_-''--7„---_:--...,---- — -- -- -,--,‘.:,-64-7:::-.L-,-- tu4...,c.,- A -, ".":;;•41;%,K.V..K1-'.-17•M' -'•11.4-Azi'''!'‘ ■ ".,,,.:24't§iAtirdte4EKKaTRAY&I----',..•--..,;••:,:•:--4-°.r."..-01.Jlket"-4( 310V--ZirE1),,'•41',.•--10.-=4•11-• -:';• t 11411nis• -.L. ' -'----= -ftt'07, 14K.50-74--':•-4c-7-zz• -- KA•e-,Y-',:4--•'-=K•.:4MI'C'••,,WKZ.§...1 'Kur LIK-1,7.•,-.4-.KNA-14---14•0 fK-Vi'4$. 'r,',(•.'.4,- '•.•••• -5--;,•:•0244P;14., ',.4.';;•4,...■-•1"'•--.4.-4,4t0 tlt..-c.;•:•=1.,4,-•-..4 • • .• ''•-- -i-4;.-•••,-7•44•,-4,744-••=•••••1:-, --t•-74•04r,....12,41r4,•:•,0'4,:ki.• ,-.,:. r3grad.,. 4,-4..;1, ' •• • iz:w,-;,,T,',..,;.4.jf,,,,, -4,,,,,,,.A,,i-,,w,„*,.. ,,..,4 . , ,,,,,,,,,,.,.„,,,,,,,. . , . .,,,,....01,,,•r ,,4„...-,,I.,,,..,,..-.4.,34 .1,...,:r.'-731 r-,..., 7,4ar;41-3 ! r , y,?,,:i., „t! . ,^,,,-.4-,•;11 II 4V-,..."'E-A-,•,-,';.-.,,,•:‘,..3,z,•:',.!;:',',Ter-lin:Pt:''' '• I' .--,1•11. '"04:flY,Y, (;•"11 -e,4,,fi:F.:7 Alf,;•',,",'4'•;'.,i;i:III4VILIV4:,OVt-,:`,::.„.4r:I,, _rciT,":"•,' ...4,i lutr-Aliltk..-: I'1(.4,--itl, ligtatipf:TA,I,a,v4-.17.4.1,f., ..,t',•-:i .1..... it-Ifkgr.1,"ill.14.•,,,,,g,I.-.,rui'44,.r titIA..! .1,,--L5 1.4,,-.:'.f.r4t6tigt-,q41z,•:;.:A-...:: -S-•:.:-,'-',.....q,-,4,74011„II r:ii.•411.iiii xi rf,''-lt:•-••_-. •..-,•,.•`---'""••:)ti-illi fi:F:V...(:;?,- -::,:..04.,i4A-1:.,-Aiitaatv,4_,T4OR4114•:,.•-•.,•..:,-..,-.;.:„4,6 ,i:;-,,Ii- .:,,f,,,,-,,,'N,i l.. 1,;1';-•::;_.5k6,,,,,6,4kffork4_,:srl- li.-_-4“73rift.:,.-i-_,,:iN..4.tr•-%•,:vcr...t..,.. lif,it;-:, - 4--.10,,,a- .,1. ',a1r03,,,,k b-.,,,,.-t:,?(- 1 1-'''; 1 '' '.;,>':i'''-:t:3:-,7A114,.., ,,,-4,k.j1 '.,,,,,,,:1,-.,..6,..,:74 Cy‘i-‘,=‘ irt:. At j.,1_42.4'4,-,,,t% it WIr,.■Ralikis 6.,.'`If:7 ,-,(c.f, !=,.Z.';.. A704=:-.=m.-tAzr?,..Lii-7.g . .iwt.',-iiT'ti..,.T.11:1;.41:41-'.-;‘:.,---:i, 4, ' - _ ugmlrolt..,th.4.4.1r,-,;■;_;- 4,t Al,...-.4 ,.-7 ,•,t4;ag.f01K•Krr,i-KK• ___t•'''',._'' -'•=41:,0'.E.',...K.Kt:-.420i? fil•••-•42'-,4,,.--'f';:'-'''-'24K-,-,4'-'7-'"--••••-.J.Ni'._•:••• '`-- -...-,..1.-&•,,,,,,,,:-------;t71-,-__•4:?..K.4:4-..,t,zt.,,,,,. '0.44••,,i;,,,R.p...0.43444r,74:2eA,,,,,,.00,4,,,..44:-E.,-F,•-_,- :',,,,,,, F%--'4---.,..,.!,-,, ,,,_;...•;... , ity,,,,77:17,-;•pi-0,:-4.,... ....1 "' --7.---- , •,- '', --.7, ,„1-47,'71,15: - 661[ ,,i',,....,...e..., ,,„,,,,,,,,....... .......-..„_-,•A,..r4.2.-v47:4727.--,==, _. ----T._r',-0,,•,,„ -'''-,____,-,. --.-A-_,,,i'2,-4a,Lna';.--rr..1''';'' m.,.-'4'017- --'",er'::.'_5--',,,',,..,„,,,, , 1.t.....,,,'74=. -4-''',:'`'''' .''.''....."'`;'-'-'''.- '''''''''' -'11 ''...- ''-'•-■:`,„, ,,-, ..---,',..k,- ,tr.- --..,dt,--- --7. .vr.'-'7,--,w.,.,,,,---it:.,... ,..f .''''-' ',45',L1..,',..*:.:*.=1 F,-.,,,,-6-==--=s-;-=.v-,44;',1, -., ,, --.-•-•---, .•,,-,...,...,...-,_.-„,,,,,,,,,,,,,g. ._.a-rt-7..77.fi=,/ 1...:_tr,-.et.,..s../1,-;.,:0;,.■,, .! 417t113r6ti Net-fi':',*:gl?'%'•'''P'd. ' ''''';''''7.: -P1-41fr741:' -7;7-14:-W4-'fint..iir'''40;:a4P., ;;.'f•A,szi .,,,,t..,..,dc-.:.,,,ca 4-4',4.-•`-, •i 41. . ‘,..f"ra:1%, -1 m-,.7;7.7 --_,,,0:;..-::=;,,N-:,,,.,--:,,,r,00.',11.A.,:.---mptaid ii 1 1 li._tfigw--ii,r-,`,,,,-.R.1"‘;.' t ,H.• 4 r. .;-.1.....ilti,'''.";,:‘,tht,:11., - .,1,-... t,„•. -:,,,16. ..•, 4,,,,,,.*4... .,,,,,,-t.:,,,•:,-,.;,-,..,.....3,it.t.,,i.k.,,,,,,.1./.4;,•.1,-.„,,,,ai t .7,,,.=.*3,„.r..v. _ i, -, -,A,„..„?,,b ,..":0-'1, -.,';c-4 ge.,1_'--",r,_,-.;(=--'.',..;Lf,-To;t • , •vi , MA 7 444—'1 .1't ',t',..' - .1.'4 V".-..'1%,4.4.474/,,A,PFSAFf4'0 L..-g 117 I .)v.,4' ..ii.... '---• ,-;;IitAkAiliir'' ',1'..".-,;LL.,'-- ";.0.,,• :;''qi 1 14,---_,,,,,;4. i''4,6;--.;,-.,!"4-791.210 c,, -24*[ L',":.,•..t..,..'._0 . ,,,'. ..;:-..;:,7)-':,.:;::.%•:.,.:.'-lftil,VONLI:re,--'''. ' '•• -tvw- ' .1,041., '..k-;:i'•11.1r3::,1glilleil ....-;-..-'-il'b.li--.1,.,_.■qk`.::',,t-4 • i.- Ewe. ,-,4:';;..i•:,..,-,&,::::T:::.:,.....,::40-4:,-dv,r4.1.'*‘"Irmt.--„ii-.,'034-17.0_ ..fa tr,41,•ii 1:i i41.174111,9::-ilfr',. •.i'• 2.4 i''.11::tqFYLI-1 •„..t,A v;„ ...,.-. Y '-i,i,02:-I..T.:,.. ' ..,11-*--4--p :',.,'.••,,.;;-.::.f;•;i,;;',-;I:t.,::-::-..n.,.k,,40 -aii 12..;.,.:, ,..% rir A Oa,'1,1;4:1X1'1*:',P.. 1:\IM,TA fktra,;'Ikak,,'3„1,1,..,''':ji 1,4 ,,,..;",,,,,,•,!...?:,;;,..:::4:::,,,;....,:..,,..-,T•i„....'A''.-vitatlii Ufify:44.,:••.',a,::,,,-- -4.6-91"•Tivtatii7,12,tt.40-Ati ITY--' l'-'.•P•61I.,"'-,?'-', 41: ' ;-' ''••-13..,2 .'mv‘-.._:- ., :,....,.--,=..:;,':r34EitYPIn011idg.01811:4,NopptiggLO.4tip,54,4 1.4.:,p4;,1-141 q-;.,,•:,,„Niz,tte4 ..tl'•.,,ti., ,...,,,,__....!.....;.q.4 :,...11,---`s,....,',..,,. •-. ,5,i rtior, i4!,.;I:t!;..s.,)•'•••;t....;ff:-0-74,r;:t,.sMitigz1.„44;KKI-ip•t-.N.44,-14k-jfittg,•4,2,--;;70:j.0 •-V4:1•J, ';P.4....,,T.,-;.1.-14:1114 1,.....,4-.....i.fliiP-2:*„.41.t....-.1,-;.c.-....rp-. :1, ' 4.31,:t ,11,, 1:!...,el.„-, ,,,b, . .;0,0,,,,.,t,,,,A.„,,,,_ r . ,v.,L....„.,,r4,,,,,,.0„,,,,,,,,,,4„yv„.„1•_,,,>,...„..,,,A,,,,,--:,K4,,,,,,:lis j•,•,4-f#,-*, iial..pltj ,s1, ''.1,•p tt; b",i.t4,417 j!:'ii,r..,,,,%,-.:-,,,j7,'1,_K;;;•:4,;:,-zt:';,..i.4,,, ,,v_,,...;:t.-.J,:fiti.^iti!*t_h lir,,4,:reti,L.V.,..?.44v-i•417,117.#4,,it.)1,/,1,--,i'4447:viarr-.1.,),,,,,,,,!t:14,2.1:4,,'•,,,4•12,3(4.1eit-, • E3 'iti•4`-".4.-•1',4 :ie'4.:.'RI 1,,'•4:1.•4f!•,••••• -,4 d•,,tA.'1•4.•:' P;-'41':','"'.•:;,...1 :3''''.;-'•-• ',,•":5S'e,';,. '''-fgale:',, ,;(0-ilv-#V.14* '4'a-1.,0iVrIF-ZiEll*,3.it'46"V. d t ,._.1;a3 „.,,,....,:s.:i; 3.. i:', fl•!!...,:l'e,,,i1 IV,. .._ ,,,,,,,e.',,...,.'..,',--,-.:.`;...,-;.3.-::-.;:::=:=4'.;r4t.=•,-,''',4' 71-',...';')I.h :Rfv-i. ''''i.. .!'e'''•',4.7-4•.'4' .,it•4170.-II;•.'4 I,:' Itr.,!•:„I'DI-D:I.,,',.-fiI,'.7,;.:11.,t:'•',,i )14,1,--e•;,,,trtMlqINIAt ',.;;'ffiV.„.„4,\A 4- ,i‘4.4"./ki,',,,,,*.gPLU-c--;,11.4-kik•441 L,g,,s1,,,A.,,,..„..1J4..r_.,.:::-Ify Y,•_111-51.i.r,:f,•;,,, ,..-4.4,..4.1,,v,--.:-.4-,.,.---A0-;;;;,,Vg,I.;.,."!:',..:L.:."-•'.4:.: 2v.;',-,:,,,,,*,!,:g: '.`tle ItliVAYAr''AP",.:-!,'-'•=:::All:' II .If ' ''fin.,L".i..2.V:14:',.k'',;:,.;i..'.',.10',,•1.-',.q,'!•'.- ,'' ' ' :-.•We.:igit-s,),a- ' •2' -'=-'-'?fl•_. -,',;•-11...r ,,,,,.:z4-4z,g,t.,,t.1__:-_-??,,L14‘i-.:51-.,.:,,=-1'_2_,.. ;)': fit,,°?,;eiv.,,o;...-....::.._Y..,if,:::,,,::>4,,......,-,-;;:,iit'.4:4'41,-;q:"'''41'V-'"?'"MY-6T.•,,*I:1- 3,,,u,'L - ',,,.. _ , 4 ,., 7.f, .,,,,..-zpll At -...43,0.4-3;In'',,J4-k,;;;;',.idl,,,,,,ii,-,3•:-.,3...43',1,-,.c."14';:,,14,49 ,;,4!feT.ii",_ .4-4-,-+-;;-',',1*,'?.4. ,.,07/40,4„t3q.'.X41, g'",,?:',...,:;,!:"..t34,-!,1 ;:,;..:.r...=.,.,.. ..,..••::,,. .:,.--..-,-*,---.ccvgly e.•,:4- 7-4 ,, VMMTP:146.. ..--i,e-v-Ii.la'd.,,c,.:1';17..{.4.5- '-iiLicUlat4:1•,----al.'.,..1-',;;AILLM,'Ailts,,,e;. •oi.14.B.i. ,, .. ,;;, ,,,;,:,-;:l.Ati' , •, 3.10/...a,N;',.541 '•-•'--44'.5'I'''''''''-f.- 11•54P-'4'•--•":-'•-'•••'J II. -••=itlk'1411-'41V•41-44•44V-11•%,'•KIIN•1, .d114-4-Alifrf ,g..:3-1, ,."''' ' . . t', ..\,- '-44 t.f.. -..'- .--',4'4..?,:-.4,4r.T4gr,,4,44 '4..3 i,hrrii.tsp,10.4:1,4 1 r. t:,--:',411, i‘' ';'• . ' ' . --KA i• '''at'ertr:4•:,' ' " " • ,• ' '. . • FIJA-434:-1,7J-.•••::•,•=7,-:40-4?-:4•4,141:;A•ii• - '• ----)W4'4.44"'''0•,3 '..4•7>•30,'• -T1-.1 ••••-•.1; :' K L. • , 0,-.,.......,...,,te +1,1-e,...,' e'' ''''.'..t.',::,4.,‘1,.! ' ' ; - . , • .' 0-3. -..-,..S4,_,1/2,,,- '11V-4.11.4,74iC".ti'4.A.-1-A, N ''-fi.kiii A 1 -4..'d.'‘v,. , 4-1,..: +'''t '' .'. .. . '..' . .. - k0,4'.sPla. Itl'i'•V'4';-;.f.14Z,P12'7,PIC.r,r,. : 17:-'"VI'r■'31"i#...' '0:-•"'"2. 1-'*.41,? '4 ''.) ,V.'1611A "D.IW.ifi5j.■ 1- 1. : ' . ' .., ' , -... • . .10;:e;.1k.:S.'f- '112 psifi,Z01,44, %,.'',.ilial -',.,.'',11 .7•At,v, '%:4';?,,,,I;2.. ','11 0 ',4,17,0 ,,,u.--,.-it,',hr.--;n-- ilv,,,,,?„,,,,tcP,=:!„i.,:,.0,n.,--7.:,,,r,:;!,,,-41'gil',• '' ' ' :,.. -.-...-'ztP01,,'",',Alt-il'.. 'Ir-.7,64.4,za;?-,:,;%-TEn-(4?,fei, 1,',01 . te.,":".; .Wipi:AN,, isi -147.4 ,45.0017i,4_,-4-t-V-::-lfftt;Ail,'::az-T7---1,r6T5g-vxzvg'rij,,ztso-w-ik-, v.t,4.17.-A.Ao ..>•.`1.•,;1•Iiivtri I 1,-c, ••lit..4.•,Ti.11•,,Tit,7-1=14k,'Eili' i',,•-1,..-q4A-sa..-PA i,r9AkviiiY,i,-.4--.-2.3T.0-g1,,,...;_,;i:,:mk,-...4.',J.-,?,-2,14- -- ,-,..40 '.;i:,,,,n7::1,34,,,,t,I.1.441.„,:v4i, l e ,..•Lr425ve, tsg,i-s,=;4"-.7.z.q-.4 ';1.,`4 is- " . '-'-, - "'.' . '',-_'•F"•.•700.17,,t,i4V•teff.'ti4P7$5,„ .rA-141.1,K, ,LP-N0414.itr',_...W.M;'•---S.;,: ii•!--:,_"44,11N4g,•4fr,?A• •,,`, Is " ;t1;"4,•'-'47,7-j-1M, T. .,4,,,PX-iitit, -.0 i‘.•'-.-•,,....,,, • ••• '•: A M7'•'74.T.,-t'•*-a":•)474,4-41•K`FAV-*'-5 -'2w..tffi- lik,!;''4, r•4•="4-,-.`''';',Pr I :trKIK•tqi:t4i.‘ei-illeit ';':,-.•,•?,. , 1.40PT,,,,§f-s.,-7:1-ig'''4•`A N-,,•••16' Il 11:-..-P4tr2t•'tv.o41:.4T --1--44;--,',•'_4;4.1%.0.,',F,vAWYKIN'.,.fir.49.-it.4„34,•tere•--.44=-40-,••• ,,. „--•-.7-r--_,41.1):let ,iA•• 7,0„4.081e,;,-. i \f. •- ., 4-i-734,',.-1 •• -7,4„,,•:',.vue, X---,,,,a4,. 54'-krirr. 7ti ii -'ri,,90".1•T•,,K•tan-,,,,,T3Ftlf.fiTs,'0,A„P.c'TJ•;14K:-1:0 30`11,104,m1,e,••WS•y;;;K.;k4-4!y,-,-fil4q,91,teekt.fr,•`142.111E1,''I•;1.7a'1__,,,, •';'bi,•At ?„..---„,....---,1.16-,,,.,, rr, ti .1)1"1." ..' v t1.1.A 14.11'-' '' Wii'ffueopifealriiihigIcsr•=4*,K;• Ji;--1,y-4•4?,11Xiel,..0.NF•J.1.2.S. „,., t, A.,,„:.,-_,.. ..'T',-11 l' .1-145-444•al:)'' '-'-':i•4;;-4I,'' -PI.- 44t;‘AII '''Vif6•1 liA-?4•J:, ',,t•'411t1/', ',54.1`1,2:211raPti'VA.,AII,'45,„'Itg,•-.. ,11,21k1...),i I'"-!•,;',,,i,-.-•„•,!•.,,_,,,1..-,-,-.•,_•. ..71•:-.,,:,•f-,-;•:,,,,..-.,.,■,•.':-.1.a._it-.,I.JV++;110 ,- -'!...I= 1::,•',•l',;,••:C''',,''.-,IL ;441.,„,0xot,,Irotair.0-2-41,6.1....p. 1.,,,,i--:-,,,,,_0,01-7•tt ;-2,2010 ..„,,,,,,!„,.. a •,..,,..,...,,,-..,,,_.....,•,,,k' --'26^i2'37.fitrii.-%''ErP.44W.'3ViAr:1"day 1440 ' -a'',"•'.•''.:. 4x,-,,,..- .- .--., ...,-•._ ."r._■_. .. , ID% 4- 6_sn-) OK------- --------- 0 ' . --. . ri‘ tCA Packet Page-3201- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TABLES 1A, 2A, & 3A Packet Page -3202- I 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. W c -1 WW Z V a 1 } } y Y Y I I } I I I 11 J_ N V Q co a Z w w aI I 'R� ` m r°`l• I I T,.. 1 I t II Q Q t 07 I I I I I I f ¢ n' QI I v 2 N 1 N O U Z.0 N o W a I m i z 1 I co I 1 I 1 1 N a W V . m ce ° Y I co- ai vi U I I in I I I I I N N LL 030 e o e 2 0 a I °0 0o 0 °o 0 I I g I I I 1 1 Q W ,z N N N N N N N I- C7 z �›. K e QI I m / l. g ^ I I N I ii I I ct J U U ceUJ z :1 Ct U N O N P- to �. O O N I 0 „ 0 1 I I I 1 U N N In M UI N Z III CC s a Z 1 E a o a 8 I I n I I I I I N F- al I.L. U_ WI ° n W m I I I I 1 Q I . g g m I.- I I c2 OQ N 0 N N N N N U a I- > U +- W ¢ r Z z } zz zz Q E z >, } > Z - Il Z 0 - cc J - U co ¢ o c Q U 0 N ¢ o o e ae a at ae • o et ae °o, N e I--' ,_"' K O z N co. a s ON ° 0m co � w �Q? a -i ¢ N ai ui r m N o N o o a, Q 7 N o 0 a. z d' v o ,0 u o W . . m N N 7 ` N m co T M p i Q t(� W N Z m a F % ID W ii W N N- ('C N N m r N r N $ Z a ¢ o U W Lu WI e o o a o U o o e e g LL m z 3 A N a 1 I N N I E. Z 0.. a n u o = i� 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '� n 0 O O 0 Q0 N N r N n N 0 0 00 co rn w 81 it J Z co 19 ri M M l0 N N M Oi M M N o N ¢ ii M (V CO cn f, ro o } o �v N 4 cn I 0 0 J 0 '' N I I g W o 0 0 3 ❑ y 9 0 W 0 g 0 9 to m (0 (D to N 'mod' rn w N N N , r a N W rn 2 el �D tl`o �o {ten r t� In N N V v d 6. W m M N N V m 8 v 11 n .ci a i it co rn yy 5 8 cL QaaQ C cc U m m m a N 0 0 o Z 0 d S Q Q € m V a 0 a 0 0 N 3 F• o c m m a 2 ID m z c 0 CO c W W Z a 3 L .E L ^ o C S w 0 3 5 4 D a a _ 3 o. ¢. a °. a .� cc K o `0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `o 0 0 `o o m n n w 3 3 5 al ui ui ui z US �i Z vi z vi - 3 x 0 0 x x m v c a W x U Q rn o d Z ¢ a Q Pc o. o 0 co c of O O, a s O a 3 Packet Page-3203- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 0 I- to seeeese e e. ee ee o CO N a) at O h M 7 V) O N to cn ID F N co. d' n tq N W V r M N co o0 O J N ((i N r r O O r r co O co '- 0 o W it n y 0 a0 .�- N N N co N CO O h M M I- > U W O N e e e e e o o e o e N(� e e e pa, cn to O h cal ca: N r co. a 0)l O (co. q Q. ti h 2 to O r ,- CO (p CO N r O M co O o r co a e i- ce w 0 N r r F W e° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e . ( 0 0 !n N O 0 .- O b' sr r <r r (D 04 o I-� O 0I; (o (D r m .- m O O N co N m TTC J O O N ri N O O O co O co U = W CO N CO N r M N N O .N- O .N- (0 0 I- > 0 z 0 'O 0 C0 e e s e e e e e e e e e s e co it V co co 1` co 0) .(h (a n co t (0 E- a 1- 0 (fl 0 w M (° d; ro ry rn o (o (n y J N '.F r 0 o 0 o o co co 0 r a a 'LL41 ° v � M 0 LC W Z 41. III I-. (NO m J CO co O N CO CO .Od, CO N M N H z > LLI U III CO d II II ? ° E- ♦- E- ~ ~ ~ FT- F2- I=- F- F2- F2- t— no 5 S o 0 W W W W rt n I 0 NY 0 o z 1- _ u� o zz z o z co o Z Z 0 e. Z 0 y J 0 0 W W LL o 0 0 0 o e a e o o\° Z N CO IY O Q N '4- I I M a) NP O I ,_ to O O to ("D a a Pe U 0 I- 1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 kg- II II (n c9 U) (•) m a) a) 0 0 0 0 r 0 Lo Z Z ti n I` N± r CO CO W a0 rn 2 W o a) 0 C') M C.i C7 C') CO- N M M CO Cr; C7 N. -J E g a z III # Ca r N N N (0 M ('7 7 'V N .2 c0 N o 20. 2 W - O m m CO~ tD .N- (n u7 u) tJ M V' V' C a. 3 a) e CO LO N O O cC t1 it L. LL T7 -co �3 J 'O 'p N Tl 'O -6 t7 K v - T 0.' CO d' cc d' cX d 5 c ° .€ v d 0 o m ru d d E 0 V F- o 0) o t5 a c a S E cc a u W W Z e. 5 'o o a N al a) a) E' a) a) a) cu E W :?c ig ° c c m c E c e g J n' a > J. J a. a 2 a h. a a '' CL ce s w ØO90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° II (A LA u! IA ttl Z fri uj Z-6 U.1 s It v 0 Aiek cC Q n. < °) c > > a ° a m J J 0 , c I- a 0 a J Packet Page -3204- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TABLE 3A ANNUAL GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS BASED UPON HISTORICAL AUIR DATA 2006 2010 ANNUAL ACTUAL CURRENT AUIR AUIR YRS OF GROWTH GROWTH ROADWAY SEGMENT ID# VOLUME VOLUME GROWTH RATE RATE Pine Ridge Rd. W.of Airport Pulling Rd. 66 3,072 3,028 4 2.00% -0.36% - W.of Livingston Rd. 67.1 3,641 2,844 4 2.00% -5.99% W.of Protect Access 67.2 3,641 3,082 4 2.00% -4,08% E.of Project Access 67.2 3,641 3,082 4 2.00% -4.08% E,of Whippoorwill Ln. 67.2 3,641 3,082 4 2.00% -4.08% E.of 1-75 68 3,230 2,276 4 2.00% -8.38% E.of Logan Blvd. 125 1,823 1,386 4 2.0(1% -6.62% Livingston Rd. N.of Pine Ridge Rd. 53 2,541 1,662 4 2.00% -10.07% S.of Pine Ridge Rd. 54 2,292 1,618 4 2.00% -8.34% S.of Marquesa Plaza Access 54 2,292 1,618 4 2,00% -8.34% Airport Pulling Rd. N.of Pine Ridge Rd. 2.2 2,317 2,015 4 2.00% -3.43% S.of Pine Ridge Rd. 3 3,263 1,991 4 2.00% -11.62% 48•' 657 687 4 2.00% 1.12% Logan Blvd. N.of Pine Ridge Rd. 2.00% -8.71% S.of Pine Ridge Rd. 49 1,811 1,258 4 •All traffic volumes were obtained from the 2006&2010 Annual Update Inventory Reports(AUIR) In Instances where the historical data Indicates a reduction In traffic or Insufficient data was available to calculate a growth rate due to construction,a minimum annual growth rate of 2.0%was assumed. SAMPLE GROWTH RATE CALCULATION 2010 AUIR "(1/Yrs of Growth) Annual Growth Rate(AGR)- -1 2006 AUIR 3,028 ,(1/4) AGR(Pine Ridge Rd.)_ -1 3,072 AGR(Pine Ridge Rd.). -0.36% Packet Page-3205- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. HCS+ INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY SHEETS Packet Page-3206- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. PINE RIDGE ROAD @ LIVINGSTON ROAD Packet Page-3207- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. SHORT REPORT DAMPAIRMANIMMBEOWSUri,',i,0:0,c-,:-:,,ralarifswhi IX:WIT-MICIAMMEN-Miant Analyst DLW Intersection TR Trans on' on Pine Ridge/Livingston rtation Agency or Co. Consultants Area Type All other areas Date Performed 4/18/2011 Jurisdiction Collier County DOT Time Period AM peak hour Analysis Year 2017 background 0.,1:74ii.id.717Filh,L: 0-..1 '':45:.:1110.MAL:c;:.,,: : W.:,,riV:A=VEtya. EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 2 3 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume(vph) 158 788 172 351 1672 130 368 479 97 278 731 315 % Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup Lost Time -1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 17 0 0 13 0 0 10 0 0 32 Lane Width 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/Hour . Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Aski, Phasing Excl. Left WB Only Thru &RT 04 Excl. Left Thru & RT 07 08 G= 21.0 G = 20.0 G 35.0 G= G = 21.0 G= 33.0 G Timing Y = 5 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis(hrs)= 0.25 Cycle Length C= 150.0 EMBIBENTOLOV.NUNriltiniroltrADMISITINSV74::;„:5 74-,•-!,11 EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 166 829 163 369 1760 123 367 504 92 293 769 298 1184 1054 1860 1116 1116 Lane Group Capacity 481 369 580 481 617 481 348 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.70 0.44 0.35 0.95 0.21 0.80 0.45 0.15 0.61 0.69 0.86 Green Ratio 0.14 0.23 0.23 0.31 0.37 0.37 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.22 0.22 Uniform Delay d1 58.3 52.7 49.1 40.4 46.1 32,6 62.5 50.7 47.2 60.6 53.8 56.2 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.27 0.11 0.11 0.46 0.11 0.35 0.11 0.11 0.20 0.26 0.39 Incremental Delay d2 0.4 1.9 0.8 0.2 10.8 0.2 9.7 0.3 0.1 2.2 1.8 18.6 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 58.7 54.6 50.0 40.6 56.9 32.8 72.2 51,0 47.3 62.9 55.6 74.8 Lane Group LOS E D D D E C E D D E E E Approach Delay 54.5 52.9 59.0 61.4 Approach LOS D D E E Intersection Delay 56.3 Intersection LOS E Copyright©2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+114 Version 5.3 Generated: 4/20/2011 12:45 PM 144144' Packet Page-3208- I 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. SHORT REPORT Rayan O O y,n ecf ok k ..•1c4 4.re I�O�m a .1 s cc 1z -f br 5 ` i .";. -x -`', Analyst DLW Intersection Pine Ridge/Livingston Agency or Co. TR Transportation Area Type All other areas Consultants Jurisdiction Collier County DOT Date Performed 4/18/2011 Analysis Year 2017 background Time Period PM peak hour y_ ijj� .. , f 2 t{�'Y A M , � i k vM,,i�. 1K 5 h,�S V g�1lvtc "'i� �Xa b_yri� i�)k 7't��'d ii= .AP:N4 rio. o Ci a ,,e e tl f t/ �'t�;�k�'''�i$ts d,}�;��,t� �'N-'J�' ��;��.tf 4S b7.��, '� ,1��!tttv�I�fiV,s .. h \ t�. �.� EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 2 3 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (vph) 264 1911 395 229 1248 253 306 771 303 293 538 193 % Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A AA A AA A AA A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Blke/RTOR Volume 0 0 40 0 0 25 0 0 30 0 0 19 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N O N N O N N O N N O N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 _ 3.2 Phasing Excl.Left Thru& RT 03 04 Excl. Left Thru &RT 07 08 G = 18.0 G = 62.0 G = G= G = 21.0 G= 29.0 G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y = 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis(hrs)=0.25 Cycle Length C= 150.0 a7 ii a A 2.n ti j' }! � f��iI",gu'P'� ice.1tf'� v' +�'i�� Tl�',. �.. EB r WB NB _ SB Adjusted Flow Rate 278 2012 374 241 1314 240 322 812 287 308 566 183 Lane Group Capacity 412 2097 654 412 2097 654 481 981 542 481 981 306 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.96 0.57 0.58 0.63 0.37 0.67 0.83 0.53 0.64 0.58 0.60 Green Ratio 0.12 0.41 0.41 0.12 0,41 0.41 0.14 0.19 0.19 0.14 0,19 0,19 Uniform Delay d1 63.2 42.8 33.8 62.5 34.8 30.4 61.2 58.1 54.4 60.9 54.9 55.2 Delay Factor k 0.25 0.47 0.17 0.18 0.21 0.11 0,24 0.37 0.13 0.22 0.17 0.19 Incremental Delay d2 4.3 11.6 1.2 2.1 0.6 0.4 3.6 6.0 1.0 2.9 0.8 3.2 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 67.5 54.4 35.0 64.6 35.4 30.8 64.8 64.1 55.4 63.8 55.8 58.4 Lane Group LOS E D D E D C E E E E E E Approach Delay 53.1 38.7 62.5 58.6 Approach LOS D D E E Intersection Delay 52.1 Intersection LOS D Copyright©2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/20/2011 12:45 PM Packet Page-3209- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. SHORT REPORT 'Ge„„e al In tg o rtt Ea n 4`:' ' `0y.t '-. a t. , yrj A ? g,, L -1r- Lffu.....b.�tA.J'-�'1.._..� _ F .. �^'�d t �s�`&.Ve �zl�'�SP _�' '.�,�.��_�at'�� V!'��.��1 �I�4i9�- ,.L��t} L` N�'i�D i(v b�a{t Y i. Analyst DLW Intersection Pine Ridge/Livingston Agency or Co. TR Transportation Area Type All other areas Consultants Jurisdiction Collier County DOT Date Performed 4/18/2011 Analysis Year 2017 background+-project Time Period AM peak hour 0 Y i'' an 0= 0. a fi p• '�'�{, r3.ti rf.i(:6^tt tP l'i IA"}F{r�t _r E,3 Pt�y i�"J�!piw i Z )-C ? B' Is V 7 C �, y _ 0 kdl��A�l9?J ��c�,,,�t�A3•tiu,�,'P�17?._rr,.l�,t+t1��1. �.�,�j�`�:.s.�F �S+�l��fs�,�;t�t ��ir.,i.".��i�'`rslt`S�;r�;}�'��Yr nf�,.r`�.�'��k�`�t� .. Rt'�., i<� EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT . TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 2 3 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume (vph) 158 880 182 361 1686 133 382 483 102 301 734 315 % Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A AA A AA A AA A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 18 0 0 13 0 0 10 0 0 32 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N O N N O N N O N N O N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 oik Phasing Excl. Left WB Only Thru & RT 04 Excl.Left Thru&RT 07 08 Timing G = 21.0 G= 20.0 G= 35.0 G = G = 21.0 G= 33.0 G= G= Y = 5 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs)=0.25 I Cycle Length C= 150.0 � 3` gym• ��,- �- ,�� ,,..�ne o CA6paa t• o ,trol'D' a. . S D to win '.ti`,-- , �,.. . � - i; s7 ..b+a,..,• ,p.�,+, tr. mn,..�,�f'�� ,:41.: I et_' `. t � ., �.t�° �.,,'4 : f EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 166 926 173 380 1775 126 402 508 97 317 773 298 Lane Group Capacity 481 1184 369 1054 1860 580 481 1116 617 481 1116 348 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.78 0.47 0.36 0.95 0.22 0.84 0.46 0.16 0.66 0.69 0.86 Green Ratio 0.14 0.23 0.23 0.31 0.37 0.37 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.22 0.22 Uniform Delay d1 58.3 53.9 49.5 40.5 46.3 32.7 62.8 50.7 47.3 61.1 53.8 56.2 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.33 0.11 0.11 0.46 0.11 0.37 0.11 0.11 0.23 0.26 0.39 Incremental Delay d2 0.4 3.5 0.9 0.2 11.9 0.2 12.2 0.3 0.1 3.3 1.9 18.6 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 58.7 57.4 50.4 40.7 58.2 32.9 75.0 51.0 47.4 64.4 55,7 74.8 Lane Group LOS E E D D E C E D D E E E Approach Delay 56.6 53.9 60.2 61.8 Approach LOS E D E E Intersection Delay 57.4 Intersection LOS E Copyright©2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/20/2011 12:46 PM ,x,.%G"' Packet Page -3210- , 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. SHORT REPORT ] r r / 'F" {j'a M t tes �4'"��u '8 W r" 'ff +sue ix'# `i ener I":.r�. a�Jo. � ��_fiR�ti� �� z)�u�;�s>� � t��:v►�foC.R? ! ��.. Analyst DLW Intersection Pine Ridge/Livingston Agency or Co. TR Transportation Area Type All other areas Consultants Jurisdiction Collier County DOT Date Performed 4718/2011 Analysis Year 2017 background+project Time Period PM peak hour F p ��n r_„ fi J- i+".J 1 . C ,w� 1? "' 3 '9. qr li WNi v7'ff.) • ©� be�° m ._.:�c�j 4n ..! �,�, aS�i��r�L 1 d�s' v sr EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT _LT I TH RT 2 Number of Lanes 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 ? 3 1 Lane Group L TR L T R L T R L . T R Volume (vph) 264 1980 403 285 1322 271 381 790 307 310 540 193 %Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.9-5-10.95 0,95 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A AA A AA A AA A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 40 0 0 27 0 0 31 0 0 19 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N O N N O N N O N N O N Parking/Hour - Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 _ 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl.Left Thru &RT 03 04 Excl. Left Thru&RT 07 08 G= 18.0 G= 62.0 G= G= G= 21.0 G= 29.0 G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis(hrs)=0.25 Cycle Length C= 150.0 LP Q' y, Bra � a d OsS MIME ROW:.:c r!; Y '�r r SB :� �" i-p'Gap � ro� ��t � �:�� },� �° .t'0,1, memo EB WB NB S 2084 1392 Adjusted Flow Rate 278 382 300 257 401 832 291 326 568 183 2097 2097 Lane Group Capacity 412 654 412 654 481 981 542 481 981 306 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.99 0.58 0.73 0.66 0.39 0.83 0.85 0.54 0.68 0.58 0.60 Green Ratio 0.12 0.41 0.41 0.12 0.41 0.41 0.14 0.19 0.19 0.14 0.19 0.19 Uniform Delay d1 63.2 43.8 34.0 63.6 35.6 30.8 62.8 58.4 54.5 61.3 55.0 55.2 Delay Factor k 0.25 0.50 0.18 0.29 0.24 0.11 0.37 0.38 0.14 0.25 0.17 0.19 Incremental Delay d2 4.3 18.2 1.3 6.4 0.8 0.4 12.0 17.1 1.1 3.8 0.9 3.2 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 67.5 62.0 35.4 70.0 36.4 31.2 74.8 65.5 55.5 65.1 55.8 58.4 Lane Group LOS E E D E D C E E E E E E Approach Delay 58.8 40.9 66.0 59.1 Approach LOS E D E E Intersection Delay 55.6 Intersection LOS E Copyright©2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/20/2011 12:46 PM Packet Page-3211- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. PINE RIDGE ROAD @ WHIPPOORWILL LANE A3 Packet Page-3212- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. SHORT REPORT ' le li," c s r ,t O a r 7 etkb.0 s + ° *- I.is , '1, Analyst DLW Intersection Pine Ridge/Whippoorwill Agency or Co. TR Transportation Area Type Al!other areas Consultants Jurisdiction Collier County DOT Date Performed 4/19/2011 Analysis Year 2017 background Time Period AM peak hour kta#40r Mika.11.60ir',n .> 4 r i m.y. 0 sr i g s'iw g ,-v7 'IMAM 74',11;:y EB WB NB _ SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT _LT TH RT Number of Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L T R L T R L TR _L TR Volume(vph) 82 971 152 157 2311 148 361 7 184 50 6 107 % Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A AA A AA A A A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 _2,0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 Parking/Grade/Parking N O N N O N N O N N O N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left WB Only Thru&RT 04 Excl. Left NB Only Thru& RT 08 G = 14.0 G = 10.0 G= 45.0 G= G= 8.0 G= 8.0 G= 15.0 G = Timing Y = 5 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs)= 0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 MO;o,,.,p`(6.i a kk t Tarbiat Salea iM Vi* .T: ,l t iii r� EB WB NB SB 1011 2407 Adjusted Flow Rate 85 143 164 139 376 199 52 117 2003 2448 Lane Group Capacity 207 594 428 726 601 305 118 200 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.50 0.24 0.38 0.98 0.19 0.63 0.65 0.44 0.58 Green Ratio 0.12 0.38 0.38 0.24 0.46 0.46 0.17 0.19 0.07 0.13 Uniform Delay d1 49.2 28.9 25.8 38.0 32.0 19.3 45.9 44.8 53.8 49.6 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.49 0.11 0.21 0.23 0.11 0.18 Incremental Delay d2 1.3 0.2 0.2 0.6 14.4 0.1 2.1 4.9 2.6 4.4 PF Factor 1.000 0.920 1.000 1.000 0.826 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 t Control Delay 50.5 26.8 26.0 38.6 40.9 19.4 47.9 49.7 56.5 53.9 Lane Group LOS D C C D D B O D E D Approach Delay 28.3 39.6 48.5 54.7 Approach LOS C D D D Intersection Delay 38.3 Intersection LOS _ D Copyright©2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/20/2011 12:46 PM Packet Page -3213- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. SHORT REPORT F o-r f✓isj,. c Ai - i E :P. e �� 't.5, r (ti rf't. :6=5:`-1,6�rl.O.: r�.. � °' ~�:'�'y.�f�^�y�:t4� .>ihr�',�''4��..t"-7,i„%��"t� I.'-�D� �.Marl�a .srt �,�i��Jti.� �t :vi�.��ks:;u ,¢ �� .. ! Analyst DLW Intersection Pine Ridge/Whippoorwill TR Transportation Agency or Co. Consultants Area Type All other areas Performed 4/19/2011 Jurisdiction Collier County DOT . Analysis Year 2017 background Period PM peak hour yof ._ L,d r 1' :B ifta" '4 ' I titi sr lVre' Nk * ? tF 3 ¢ SP EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT Number of Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L T R L T R L TR L TR Volume (vph) 187 2464 354 166 1448 109 186 10 212 130 9 79 % Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.96 0,96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A AA A A A A A A A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 35 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N O N N O N N O N N O N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EB Only Thru & RT 04 Excl. Left Thru &RT 07 08 Timing G = 14.0 G= 10.0 G = 45.2 G= G= 11.3 G= 19.5 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 0 y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis(hrs)=0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 1, a iMa egligi dL 1°,. u+eI Nr.,.aelislo 1.,.n e,ei, - _ acO � s f`s , y'vws 1 ri�i; 7 �i '; EB WB NB x SB Adjusted Flow Rate 195 2567 332 173 1508 102 194 231 135 91 Lane Group Capacity 428 2457 728 207 2012 596 324 259 167 262 v/c Ratio 0.46 1.04 0.46 0.84 0.75 0.17 0.60 0.89 0.81 0.35 Green Ratio 0.24 0.46 0.46 0.12 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.16 0.09 0.16 Uniform Delay d1 38.8 32.4 22.1 51.9 32.5 24.9 52.2 49.2 53.3 44.6 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.50 0.11 0,37 0,30 0.11 0.19 0.42 0.35 0.11 Incremental Delay d2 0.8 31.2 0.5 24.7 1.6 0.1 3.0 29,6 24.8 0.8 PF Factor 1.000 0.823 1.000 1.000 0.918 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 39.5 57.9 22.6 76.5 31.4 25.1 55.2 78.8 78.1 45.4 Lane Group LOS D E C E C C E E E D Approach Delay 52.9 35.5 68.1 64.9 Approach LOS D 0 E E Intersection Delay 48.9 Intersection LOS D 'Copyright©2007 University of Florida,Ali Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/20/2011 12:46 PM Packet Page-3214- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. SHORT REPORT r 'rWrAa>nNC i i•100 VW*. aCl�t:a 11 eA 0 KIN OM-.4 e, " <, . e:., Analyst DLW Intersection Pine Ridge/Whippoorwill Agency or Co. TR Transportation Area Type All other areas Consultants Jurisdiction Collier County DOT Date Performed 4/1912011 Analysis Year 2017 background+project Time Period AM peak hour ``� tR $� �1l� 7 a g m o} ej y'!c ! iii AA7 fi ri r.d l:9.tnt t�Arayl}''k sr�jri' iA _x G`' MminitAiN.AVi 'tk':�7.�:'r"fi+'£ g. Vii �Y t .i .hfT 1.� z s € gib , fit. j EB WB NB _ SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT _ LT TH RT Number of Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 1 2 1 0 _ 1 1 0 Lane Group L T R L T R L TR _L TR Volume (vph) 109 995 152 157 2400 148 361 7 184 50 6 107 Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A _ AA A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N O N N O N N O N N 0 N Parking/Hour - Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left WB Only Thru & RT 04 Excl. Left NB Only Thru &RT 08 G = 14.0 G= 10.0 G= 45.0 G = G = 8.0 G = 8.0 G= 15.0 G= Timing Y= 5 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y Duration of Analysis (hrs)= 0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 "c° '.% J t-. °gyp re �,4.. �" .,�i� . :1p_?',�L��.f .kr'� T� r , {' } j}i+07 dl 'S";'ii 'eta+:`, We �C�o.,.,pC�s _.�;,4�.� ,�; o '�e��} ��a��..� ..® r i .... EB WB NB SB 1036 2500 Adjusted Flow Rate 114 143 164 1 139 376 199 52 117 Lane Group Capacity 207 2003 594 428 2448 726 601 305 118 200 vlc Ratio 0.55 0.52 0.24 0.38 1.02 0.19 0.63 0.65 0.44 0.58 Green Ratio 0.12 0.38 0.38 0.24 0.46 0.46 0.17 0.19 0.07 0.13 Uniform Delay d1 50.0 29.1 25.8 38.0 32.5 19.3 45.9 44.8 53.8 49.6 Delay Factor k 0.15 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.21 0.23 0.11 0.18 Incremental Delay d2 3.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 23.8 0.1 2.1 4.9 2.6 4,4 PF Factor 1.000 0.920 1.000 1.000 0.826 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 53.2 27.0 26.0 38.6 50.6 19.4 47.9 49.7 56.5 53.9 Lane Group LOS D C C D D B D D E D Approach Delay 29.2 48.4 48.5 54.7 Approach LOS C D D _ D Intersection Delay 43.5 Intersection LOS D Copyright©2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/20/2011 12:46 PM Packet Page-3215- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. SHORT REPORT -ANA p -ti h "=�i 6.4 €'}p�{1,!i c "-. hm,�.a� ,y j,.- .»: .t�FI r Y, r ret5i t'a'i i,Gr ,�-, .(:'� ��.��_,+� >ri��9,,-�„��5',�'k�",�L. �r.�. �-�Zn 7i,Z � �o ..`'$ f°�0_'a'�° ErOe''a,F�s tj-��^}�-.�:#;� �k`��i� i..�.V:c {R�-'YSS`:��rAt Analyst DLW Intersection Pine Ridge/Whippoorwill Agency or Co. C Transportation Area Type All other areas Consultants Jurisdiction Collier County DOT Date Performed 4/19/2011 Analysis Year 2017 background+project Time Period PM peak hour 0 fit D e °f pJ a� rN`X,. r�`-}"'`P I/Y gel r w A/I 3"t'Jf,}5'�L`il. VV. t k t." l �.L",3" 1F fl t - s ��,�` �`��C.j �.�;��k,t�?,��, ,,�,€.,.�Y.�i�.a�� :�t�:rtr� / r_��.� ,..� i1 ,,� �.i�+��`� �.� 1' �k � � �/ .� S_.'�l- e'Y� .r'�-�- a 0.�T_ > �#,r l��.. 1l FH�>.N�t%r'•1!�n r1,t?�lt�n'?�i�,ij4'u�-��.l��t°,�r. ,:;3y's 2`v EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes 1 3 1 1 3 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L T R L T R L TR L TR Volume (vph) 335 2594 354 166 1516 109 186 10 212 130 9 79 % Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Pretimed/Actuated (P/A) A A A AA A AA A AA A Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 35 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking _ N O N N O N N O N N 0 N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Pedestrian Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EB Only Thru & RT 04 Excl. Left Thru &RT 07 08 G = 14.0 G= 10.0 G= 45.2 G= G= 11.3 G= 19.5 G = G= Y = 5 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs)=0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 t ss:, ' .0 ! .7 apk C XI EVI E t_ _:AIrItEt r,NV ZM � D f S EB WB NB SB Adjusted Flow Rate 349 2702 332 173 1579 102 194 231 135 91 Lane Group Capacity 428 2457 728 207 2012 596 324 259 167 262 v/c Ratio 0.82 1.10 0.46 0.84 0.78 0.17 0.60 0.89 0.81 0.35 Green Ratio 0.24 0.46 0.46 0.12 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.16 0.09 0.16 Uniform Delay d1 43.0 32.4 22.1 51.9 33.1 24,9 52.2 49.2 53.3 44.6 Delay Factor k 0.36 0.50 0.11 0.37 0.33 0.11 0.19 0.42 0.35 0.11 Incremental Delay d2 11.6 51.9 0,5 24.7 2.1 0.1 3.0 29.6 24.8 0.8 PF Factor 1.000 0.823 1.000 1.000 0.918 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 54,6 78,5 22.6 76.5 32.5 25.1 55.2 78.8 78.1 45.4 Lane Group LOS D E C E C C E E E D Approach Delay 70.6 36.2 68.1 64.9 Approach LOS E D E E Intersection Delay 59.4 Intersection LOS E Copyright©2007 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.3 Generated: 4/20/2011 12:46 PM Packet Page-3216- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. PINE RIDGE ROAD @ SITE ACCESS DRIVE Packet Page-3217- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2017 Background +AM Project 3: Pine Ridge Rd & Site Access 4/20/2011 • IMIERIMIICIMA : 'O' t,.l, .'AI+1t�iAMIM :L +,t-taiili�-, i£Il➢A�f 4iiit:.d n1: � ;;, :.'i."-�`'' :i.1.0, ' 4t. Yom'. 91 Y,,',•'N:p 'k:.. 3 1�,jto-. 1. y.av S."1 t�4�='i1 P_AS_'(. Lane Configurations +ft I' 1+1 ��ytti.. 1"t r'...t ' �It{sr f, ! s, r 7 J r : t i t SJ lny�, °' K} t 1 1'i I�.l y c' 7 1 i;i� "t7,,t,�>I I:LJ ntrwJ,l :...t y . ..L. t 5 �(,ry.:.1?''�. ..'. Y_I gra° r' : >,, 5 i .F_t _0 t ;Frrk'�3' Ei • ... ... _., ... ,. s..._le.a.<. ._..v.. '.1. ...r_ ., .3 t. n .,H.�.etf n.c,rb-::1,_� Grade 0% 0% 0% ��/t•!>M1 v1'n'Z•xJr+l q{�}t l L - ( � p 4 N. !Z, M1 p^'L ,<� 1�f .l' 1 � i x�, aL T j � J 1 \. ",� .olu�e(v�hxlf) t 5 }L 1 �2 J� 8'� g 5t2t=80✓I Fl M 0 ? S F§ t, d! }e 1 ? i .r 7+,a er.✓....,,'5,�._..L,•..rC: e. ....r.�w�ev...i...._..J[a..aC' :�.,J.x.�.Y�...e>.r....+c.^..-46ui1_.e.nT:�.rr.ti!. ....... , . v t C::.... +I x,a .. .,..I ._...,._. 7scu..._,... .,�_0:._....1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ,t t~ 4 r� Y L r i t.j,j •p� 1"dt I rti x o -,ee t c r"cS" '4yt t x n > . �I•-,yloW'�r:2Pit'�.(Yp,.h) ,I'16��k� A9.;1�:ti 'fp'� �.F 1n t1P G+,�t{141 ="'..,.t..,1 �5 �..r L..r Ir,-i?y _ :1. .t=t r.. ....:1 r t S' ;•f Iri h}.. ( _ i. .. 'd i.Y^lT,'rG.iGv..I.Jt.. \.I , _. 1.. .. 1. •'-.F„ Pedestrians r 1 a o• r e y. , 1 fl.r•33.e 7 - .:•,a tt.,.�iJ!.J'; Y19•Wrt f� t .9W• i tk i �} � }—... _ ..:..�.a.f, a�.. .._..... :.'..,rr L.... .• 1..t r_4 Walking Speed (ftls) r '•" i ti" r_^rr•'ivtt n^7Y ,.i r' 1 f 'f t r t -1 r 6 .t } L.G 3 t x. Y= L r s '' t t(� l et ,i!j 4 iN J y A : s t�fyr y rmr,. � titi 4se,)gy k,ti 3; .: .k.7$..I t:. µ.. ��f?ta `f,.,:Y�..t..rr. }.F ...a7�r B�lld>=,.�9�.. ..1..4 f....._L.,.. s... ..._ a,..... ,. .;:�_. �.: � r .•,t .. I,t;. .I,�. _.";j Right turn flare(veh) ';u t rL _ _F . W _ £ j a . . y :1 �. . :1 Median storage veh) r pX, platoon unblocked Ica confl)btirig volume 351 192 387. . r r` . vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1351 1925 387 tG, .51110(e (s)r 1 ! } ;' :6 8 $}9 ) tC 2 stage(s) p0 queue free% 100 100 91 pt{}iiP II,nL "1 b ,v' �{ w.,�,` r Y'} arN Co L ex EalifeaN LMLI �� t 1 $ fv % 044 ° 4 kaW. 3$ l,•sA∎45.. V ff Ip•e:Toal ''$$ "r' 887' ` 'a 1.0�F. ' 65,. 7657 ,766 7:54` - r.. t t Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 612 V,§11,60§. Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Lane LOS y B trl a l�l?Ola O. �: ..otg-. ,`,.., Approach LOS B ErnartiTiMBWRME: S „i i4 S S iSY f 3J 1! f Average Delay 0.2 •Fr' a a I s t � � r '�- 'c ra• I t Analysis Period (min) 15 .'.'J?�i L..:J'.'l .:;. `:-:: .a.r•. .•. < _ t,tt ,,-.r .t.:S.'� I ... t� .i, .,A.:"1},kl a•s 1 .. ..,1. r•�Y-�{,. Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Page 1 Metro Transportation Packet Page -3218- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2017 Background + PM Project 3: Pine Ridge Rd & Site Access 4/20/2011, 1\ tfr r_6 MAT WatillUtlY Lane Configurations r +++ gggrarginlgf NSS§V.MSTEIMIRRNTMMFEPERnt-30.Z1K itgliTANKRIMEIffatiNgsvm Grade 0% 0% 0% MEMINASERREgitiONMENtact M'Of,k9 MIEREIRM3NINWSTRIFERIKENR,N11 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 riftigifetalkigisliNMESireNOZINWRZOMPINt.AMINFREARMAIRMIUfPRO Pedestrians Walking Speed(ft/s) Right turn flare(veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked .. . ofljctln9' diJi1T \ 2734 3249 564 vci, stage 1 conf vol VCZ21 vCu, unblocked vol 2734 3249 864 tC, 2 stage(s) 1 22 135 4 44 .1. p0 queue free% 100 100 2 aii6.070-MONR, 145 213 - alfiiii?r_ACONSIM0774. ESPIEMEMEagleii,;v4 plymTon1dJ 64 8641 13 '59r '65 93 ' Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 298 Queue Length 95th(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 254 Lane LOS Approach LOS irrr ket 10510KIA Average Delay 5.1 Kgat.[MDA:kat8.V.AI.N_:trKg.:;g71 M.W11PPIXVifigig§NRRFAM:VV.i:0 K::'.;'igVgtigg::?Mti:?:. Analysis Period (min) 15 ' Synchro 6 Report TR Transportation Page 1 Metro Transportation Packet Page -3219- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. • DEVELOPMENT OF FUTURE YEAR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Packet Page-3220- 1 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. o c0 O LC) ° co> r O T N p r N N O p 7- N N M N N co 00 c0 \ CO N I— ODD ° 0 h d co m 0 p O O p 'd' d N m -4. O d• O CO CD c- co, r • p Cl r. M r- r r N r r > V- r 7- N r r 0 J N O N ° e- p T- -J co p CD up - M 0 ( CC) CD N N C M 0 M " M eN c4 N N 0 0 0 in ce) CD E W O 00 O W M Npco d' N o F N` p ~ r a W o p0 N- p0 (D ti CD gg m coo CD O UD 00 CO CO C� N W r v-- ,r N r r L C 0 CO M ',E5 (D ( O 03 d• C? d O co O U O A M O Co N O CO N = W 7-. T r r N r 2 W N r- N N sd F"° N CC 0 0. LL' O O O ° CC) N!) o- W 7- C7 r- g C`') CO m OO 0 OD O CO r 0 r Ca N- CD h a CO Q) O a) ,t � NTN N C) C) a � r � r N r 1- O Q L. I— O ° CO ) CO M m N- O N °p cp M N d' CC N C/) CO — CO o N- N` u) d' � d' N in u) N CO O Ce 0 CZ J N O N- O CO c) r J p O p CO 0, O CZ C On CO(/, N ° N 0 04 NC°) CON ,- N N N 7- CI O) N o CD c 0 J m O CO 0 O u) N co CC op COO C ° O o o•.w +. Z •r Z N r- N P c`) co Cd r N LI- 13 M0 ,- \ I-- L() O U) ° �- O O p! N m N O N O cO h d' ''Zr CO z CEO CD. OD O p h- ,_ ti C a)= Z �' r � N N 0) v o cY) o J o 0 cn u) �- O. U c~- m M O M ° CO co QD Co m N O N c.:-5 CO O ~ M ce) O _G Np z N N 4. � N N N > O a) Cl) ,-E N E ® C LO CA 7 C O 6 O c E > ° N E >U u- cr) +a)U i m a) .4• c o y E. c C M • a) > E O 4 O > o O E 0 T c a c E a.- 6 . c CL) N 2 (' I— O -• fs a) C3 0 N "O > -O p L 2 U cn Oi LA U (n "O 0 O CU "O O C- O O) 1 1 0 0 °c) o ro °? '5 rn '5- rn c o ro °3 'p rn E rn O —' E o °' comc�i 0 ,_ ccoa_ Q 0 () 1_ 0 - t0 _ O CV a- O W H M a) *, O c0 ca a) � 0 I- uJ c Lm jm l-- C/) E -a 2m 6m a) c -p Y ti > m ca r- -1--, Um CCa. 0 CD >• N ON OEa. 0 CD >- N a- N Packet Page-3221- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. � CO ° C oo (0 od rn ° 0) OocDO o0 N N I- uN) O 8 o tom- Op m co 00 co O CO co CO > O O O CO M oOp d N • N o CD o I > N .r"- CV nj N N T— .-- c i T T O o J o 0 CO co O. 0') 00 co ) O I) Ca �t ' Q CD (0 O (D r- �— — T T r r r T T N C o "ct \°N E W OO O . C') OOM oM N W N F- N0N ° T .d. co F^ C0cO Q I O0j LmL.I c0 r CO O (O 0) N a) W r' r O (0 'ct 4") N (NI N NI N N CO L o co Q CO 0 O N N o 0 CC) CO O (0 0 CO CO 't M ',3 W r N T = W r r r N T - CO ~ CZ a) o a) o 0. O = 2 co a) oa) ° oo Emroo � ooC° ti o � O < U) 7- N Q. co N L a) 1-- O ° I— O 0 C m CC) Ca CC) 8 CD Co O CO m CO C.7 co () (D O) O 0) CO co U) N U) N C L. '-) 0 ° J U) O CC) ° C7 O a m NI O 0 (D CC) O II) m ,- O r 00 co co O M , (� t U) �— t- T- r T ›.. IZO.. N N ❑. CD 0 0 L -C CD O 00 Co co O W co co 00 00 (O p rN- I�4 z C— t- c— N T T zc- .- r• N N N LL "O 0 c- o O O F^ 0 e• O re cV m CD O co o0 Co tom. o I- m 0) 0 CA 8 co r 0 c' C al Z Z r N Z (V CD 10 L" E C J r Q c- T T J O o Q. a) L CO N 0. N o0 O (o o Co co co co O. Co 00 CD co O co O RS O Z co r co N ) CO z ., N T c O. N 0 > co a) E N E Q 42c o o o c `o to U � aa) U Li 2 C) U o > aoi 'o o j c a) o 0 c E a f«- L. O 0 o 0 a CD o +� I- o + a> o I� o + 0 0 o > v 0 0 o -0 > -0 L. 2U � v o c) o 2Ucn o0 m >a> co °� E ` co m °D o E rn o o +-+ � E 0 a) aS m Y 0 Y 'E o a) 0 m Y = Y +. = 0a) � boa H 0CD � 0a 1- a a O 0 F- CO C ea j C0 H U) C {�C - V cO as D D Q- 1- Q C • •p �Q N 1- o as '5 c U co 1 a O 0 >- N D. N D a. O U� >- N a N Packet Page-3222- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. INTERNAL CAPTURE & PASS-BY SUMMARY SHEETS Packet Page-3223- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. I Q � • E b N 1 kJ , — —" a a E 0. � _.1 e a (� o io 0 M. o UI d U o a W _E co z t' z o 0 0 t^....D d I- --- NI'V'V) G :. o° a m ; N N ` z E 3.. — _ > z E Z(/) ':114 — Q v. D-0 W v o D E u, m O O P I >�H w ( f �rss� ('4 — b ❑ m WWO. m g ig 2 w Ua � I ca WU ❑ r5 . — m 14 m o � r-t W z< m M�"� b Q r)f-- ‘.-1-1 w&_1 bQ ,-- &ç CS u8 fig _ b Q. g 1 N U Q u — W ro L li. C D F– J1- W w 2, m v- ro • ° D v fC O Z q Q ® '7-'is — X Q • 0 I P ro ® r w ow 0 N 12 (d M I- Z ° h 111 15 P '---. Iw- W F 0 .., m EJ I A w vi G Q a ° Lt — W P. Trip Generation Handbook,2nd Edition Chapter 7 if ITE 109 • Packet Page-3224- i 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. f It Figure 5.5 Shopping Center (820) X Average Pass-By Trip.Percentage vs: 1,000 Sq.Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday,p.m. Peak Period Number of Studies: 100 3 Average 1,000 Sq.Feet CIA: 329 Data Plot • ff 90 x - x 80-: 1 , a 70 x . rn x 0 60 _ k xx a ' x x x ®' x a. 50-�•• -xx•-•x-- >, x 1< x x N X x x n_ ao . x • X 8 a: X! X X It - x X. X X ili Q 30--•-X-DCX)5C- ; `--x x II x x x x X X X I— X X 3E X X X it 20-t X X X X x X • x )SC XX x x W' x X 9 X x i , ��1I 10 x a 0 r 1 -1 , , I I , 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 lig X. 1000 Sq.Feet Gross Leasable Area aX Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T)=4).29 Ln(X)+5.00 fie=0.37 gi It ft X ft f, Trip Generation Handbook,2nd Edition Chapter 5 H ITE 47 Packet Page-3225- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 5. INTERNAL CAPTURE Internal capture is permitted for multi-use developments as defined in Chapter 7 of the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. The multi-use developments should typically be between 100,000 to 2 million sq.ft. and should be planned as a single real-estate project. The calculation for internal capture should be done according to the procedure outlined in Chapter 7 of the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. Exhibit 5A depicts the ITE procedure for internal capture. Alternatively,use the county developed Excel spreadsheet with an example of internal capture for estimating net external trips (the trips at the site driveways). Exhibits 5B and 5C depict the county procedure for internal capture. The internal capture trips should be reasonable and should not exceed 20% of the total project trips. Internal capture rates higher than 20%shall be adequately substantiated and approved by the County staff. 6. PASS-BY CAPTURE The total gross external trips for retail uses may qualify to be reduced by a pass-by factor to account for the project traffic that is already traveling on the adjacent roadway. As per FDOT's Site Impact Handbook page 58, the number of pass-by trips should not exceed 10% of the adjacent street traffic during the peak hour or 25% of the project's external trip generating potential (Exhibit 6A). If the ITE Equation Ln(T)= - 0.29Ln(X) + 5.0 (ITE Trip Generation Handbook, Page 47) for estimating pass-by capture for Shopping Centers (LUC 820)results in more than 25%pass-by capture,the pass- by rate should be reduced to 25% for the peak hour. The daily capture rate is assumed to be 10% lower than the peak hour capture rate. The entering pass-by trips should be equal to the exiting pass- by trips and in the same direction as the entering pass-by trips i.e. if 20 pass-by trips heading EB entered the project driveway, then 20 pass-by trips should exit the project driveway to go EB. The approved pass-by percentage shall be applied to the total traffic and the resulting number of pass-by trips should be equally split between the inbound and outbound trips. Exhibit 6B from ITE Trip Generation Handbook(Figure 5.2 Page 32)depicts the application of pass-by trips. In the analysis of the site-access intersections,the pass-by trips shall be included and separately identified. The following pass-by rates may qualify to be permitted for other land-uses with higher potential for pass-by capture: • 50%Pass-By: • Gasoline Stations with and without convenience store(LUC 844,845) Fast Food Restaurants with Drive-Thru Windows(LUC 834) Pharmacy with and Without Drive-Thru Windows (LUC 880,881) Convenience Market with and without Gasoline Pumps (LUC 851,853) Drive-In Bank(LUC 912) • 40%Pass-By: — Quality Restaurants and High Turnover Sit-Down Restaurants (LUC 831,832) The pass-by rates for all other retail land uses should comply with FDOT's guidelines. Any pass-by rates higher than the above permitted rates shall require justification and prior approval from the County staff. - 5 - Packet Page-3226- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. PEAK SEASON DATA FROM THE 2009 FLORIDA TRAFFIC INFORMATION CD Packet Page-3227- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 2009 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL Category: 0300 COLLIER COUNTYWIDE MOCE: 0.85 Week Dates SF PSCF 1 01/01/2009 - 01/03/2009 1.05 1.24 2 01/04/2009 - 01/10/2009 1.00 1.18 3 01/11/2009 - 01/17/2009 0.94 1.11 4 01/18/2009 - 01/24/2009 0.92 1.09 * 5 01/25/2009 - 01/31/2009 0.90 1.06 * 6 02/01/2009 - 02/07/2009 0.88 1.04 * 7 02/08/2009 - 02/14/2009 0.86 1.01 * 8 02/15/2009 - 02/21/2009 0.84 0.99 * 9 02/22/2009 - 02/28/2009 0.83 0.98 *10 03/01/2009 - 03/07/2009 0.82 0.97 *11 03/08/2009 - 03/14/2009 0.81 0,96 *12 03/15/2009 - 03/21/2009 0.80 0.94 *13 03/22/2009 - 03/28/2009 0.82 0.97 *14 03/29/2009 - 04/04/2009 0.84 0.99 *15 04/05/2009 - 04/11/2009 0.85 1.00 *16 04/12/2009 - 04/18/2009 0.87 1.03 *17 04/19/2009 - 04/25/2009 0.90 1.06 18 04/26/2009 - 05/02/2009 0.93 1.10 19 05/03/2009 - 05/09/2009 0.96 1.13 20 05/10/2009 - 05/16/2009 0.99 1.17 21 05/17/2009 - 05/23/2009 1.00 1.18 22 05/24/2009 - 05/30/2009 1.02 1.20 23 05/31/2009 - 06/06/2009 1.04 1.23 24 06/07/2009 - 06/13/2009 1.06 1.25 25 06/14/2009 - 06/20/2009 1.08 1.27 26 06/21/2009 - 06/27/2009 1.09 1.29 27 06/28/2009 - 07/04/2009 1.10 1.30 28 07/05/2009 - 07/11/2009 1.11 1.31 29 07/12/2009 - 07/18/2009 1.12 1.32 30 07/19/2009 - 07/25/2009 1.13 1.33 31 07/26/2009 - 08/01/2009 1.14 1.34 32 08/02/2009 - 08/08/2009 1.14 1.34 33 08/09/2009 - 08/15/2009 1.15 1,36 34 08/16/2009 - 08/22/2009 1.16 1.37 35 08/23/2009 - 08/29/2009 1.17 1.38 AMP 36 08/30/2009 - 09/05/2009 1.19 1.40 37 09/06/2009 - 09/12/2009 1.20 1.42 :. 38 09/13/2009 - 09/19/2009 1.21 1.43 39 09/20/2009 - 09/26/2009 1.19 1.40 40 09/27/2009 - 10/03/2009 1.16 1.37 41 10/04/2009 - 10/10/2009 1.14 1.34 42 10/11/2009 - 10/17/2009 1.12 1.32 43 10/18/2009 - 10/24/2009 1.11 1.31 44 10/25/2009 - 10/31/2009 1.10 1.30 45 11/01/2009 - 11/07/2009 1.08 1.27 46 11/08/2009 - 11/14/2009 1,07 1.26 47 11/15/2009 - 11/21/2009 1.06 1.25 48 11/22/2009 - 11/28/2009 1.06 1.25 49 11/29/2009 - 12/05/2009 1.06 1.25 50 12/06/2009 - 12/12/2009 1.06 1.25 51 12/13/2009 - 12/19/2009 1.05 1.24 52 12/20/2009 - 12/26/2009 1.00 1.18 53 12/27/2009 - 12/31/2009 0.94 1.11 * Peak Season Page 1 of 7 Packet Page-3228- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. FDOT STANDARD INDEX #301 Packet Page-3229- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 1- ,i eo . ( R hh hh .°O E°' up k o •' C l° l tl • tr C ° U J U t 4 C L'1°.2 upJ ub2 C ..Y o N 08. O N W 4 ,1 k . 1,;., O h 'b_'.., ?.= :6, iii I C �4 � h E b.0 I .m 1 o d O a 4141 41 E1 4 g i m E, ` y" b .°.k t y0 ° g b"c • QS.3 a h /1 e',°+o 0 t-'9) Up / 4 L.*E 1 u e,O k V I `1 u b 4 C C m 4--• ° 9 C Cl) U i 5 h & ti u 1,,-.,,,,,, 0, o a'o O O -5,,v l- J V G - ` ■ 1 % J w W k ,l p, .1 0 1 ti` O J Q °b=.U Q0 .-- - U m Q b 1.-1 11,-Lt a� o v V b u °u LL I-- W 1.4 `p 1.* c V~N � '‘''1.' 4.: °o In to W O c'S Cwh N1 u.\ =1 b1(uh u O 1:-,,,„;,,,N O N .j 2 `.21( �m u • otitig 2° -ci J Q C1 aicN K El .t z ,I ,s •u IL b N 'q '. J Cll a ....(1...§ .Q = 5L--v— O al g oa °° d'� .o o vd.6� • u 1 d n, k m e 3 3u k b emu° e. oa a a [1 w a �n tia Fj Y a 4 p U I b a �:WIIYAy� In°o o J h� e 1" 0o 1 Cg b N h4 .°1.G N h U b a 'n IQ W� FPA°,a�' `j Q,' `,'...r J ¢J O. I p, Q .,=-- p c Q o a a b u hob 2 Illtil / ° `iH4=o ° vN 4 T� tl.m 11 4Q ° Ih eQ° ii-, Oa I^ y 40 maw`O_Q 1 m`6'w°e `u IfIN] Z§ , WSW°.e ] O ti 4 i b 1(1 / U N N h 4 q I N b 6 W `�` I. , qF°p 6U IU-9 Q V". S' 2 Qo U k I C O 1 tip b °,-i as vl_ OC • y° u ti 2. 3 p • > C. o= - ° C QC O t,-,:.i J I I I etl: NN Cw NC o E m a� W J O p C N °� ti as � 3 b � a o o 1) 2 «J u I 1 1 0 0 kl o C` ' `a ; 'o v yi�° -J,>_-_. oN '` Uq �u2 J I I I RI 00 ] Rh ° °oQ O q N h M Y C N C•` O C O y N b II M J N ° °° 4.1 Q Fp h b U L 1'' U-0 aAh k2 o I I I s a N E b U O�v W Wj ° 6 'n h o b b o W� ° �p b m `h.N� I I I N N N b H k `,.v. K U I CO . (3-4 N sN W �I ~b h� �� .p$ o N a -2e b .2u c1 0 4 WC° IC m qR N b yN J Ni �b I I ( ` i D N U °c a c on� ° a .o � " ki � i ~ZZ 4IQ�y.ct 1' b ° l.P 1" to ew U uJ ° ' tl . a o �� ` ..W o�a Y N I I I 4 N oa ° E`° .. r ,,, ti o € ... ic .JO ` ;° ijO k ° QU. h .t \2 :4 2o ip ?. ~ a a 'o] vv oa No o 40 C _o O Nroh a` m j r4y I I 3 ] [ vc ot° 5 o Rp •'`o o ° %- u ° :i o [[h . 'E w° •2 ',We c� ,s , o" N , b 5 Rh ac 2 � u ,„ t oi o N c a.5 '8 p W` U O '' u° Q o° i rO '2 C l 3 '' u$ 3: v . ° O Y ° �I ° U. O~Q I Z �O L .s°-.F.. btl U O]N YV O U 4 k Q` e W ",o v Y`kl bo" h RI R a`c° co E w W wJ W W E. t -i h O ^h 41 v N h h 2 b i oL`aN O oo a` pu 2 U, v .z..,. .; `O , of , o o m N tl E h v i° 2 ° a �., o h 3 E d a l m o „p° k ° x xg• " W r=N ti.4 up � k Fmtn Ne m O m , N ki v .i h h Packet Page -3230- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT RESULTS Packet Page -3231- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. PINE RIDGE ROAD @ LIVINGSTON ROAD Aogil Packet Page-3232- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. DATE: March 30,2011 Tz TRANSPORTATION DAY: WEDNESDAY CONSULTANTS,INC. COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM-9:00 AM TRAFFIC: ALL TRIPS 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS Livingston Road &Pine Ridge Road Livingston Road II Pine Ridge Road INTER- 15 MIN BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 44 51 19 114 25 96 24 145 17 129 27 173 54 263 31 34B 780 7:15 AM 56 73 15 144 44 114 24 182 9 129 23 161 44 286 34 364 851 7:30 AM 52 112 11 175 36 142 57 234 36 127 30 192 107 340 44 491 1092 7:45 AM 92 134 15 241 77 177 97 351 52 156 32 240 83 364 22 459 1,291 8:00 AM 72 73 20 165 72 192 84 348 29 160 42 231 82 342 22 448 1,190 8:15 AM 70 136 26 232 53 143 64 260 30 200 39 269 69 399 32 500 1,261 8:30 AM 93 82 26 200 45 137 35 217 29 184 40 253 78 390 39 507 1,177 8:45 AM 91 107 35 233 64 138 67 269 30 171 41 242 80 353 29 462 1,206 TOTAL: 570 768 168 1,504 415 1139 452 2,006 231 1,256 274 1761 597 2727 253 3,577 8,848 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS Livingston Road &Pine Ridge Road Livin•ston Road Pine Ridge Road ! INTER- HOUR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT MEM LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 244 370 60 674 181 529 202 912 113 541 112 766 288 1,243 131 1,662 4,014 7:16 AM 272 392 61 725 228 625 262 1,115 125 572 127 824 316 1,322 122 1,760 4,424 7:30 AM 286 455 72 813 237 654 302 1,193 146 643 143 932 341 1,435 120 1,896 4,834 7:45 AM 327 425 86 838 247 649 280 1,176 140 700 153 993 312 1,485 115 1,912 4,919 8:00 AM 326 39B 106 830 234 610 250 1,094 118 716 162 995 309 1,484 122 1,915 4,834 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR I Livingston Road I Pine Ridge Road I INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL I LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL {7:45AM1 327 425 86 838 247 649 280 1,176 140 700 153 993 312 1,485 115 1,912 4,919 Packet Page -3233- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. T1TRANSPORTATION DAYE: WEDNESDAYI CONSULTANTS,INC. COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM-9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:45 AM-8:45 AM TRAFFIC: ALL TRIPS INTERSECTION: Livingston Road&Pine Ridge Road Livingston Road 1,856 38% I 1,176 680 N 1 I 280 649 247 1J I Pine Ridge Road ton 115 �92 1,485 4111111311 4111.14 J �I 312 1,912 3,085 140 j 63% 2,945 rim+ 700 N1# 600 AMOK 993 153 NV 1,033 ■ ■ 327 425 86 Note: Total Intersection Traffic Percents(%)represent movement volumes 4,919 divided by the total intersection traffic I I 1,114 838 11 1,952 40% Packet Page-3234- 1 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. DATE: March 30,2011 "f3. TRANSPORTATION DAY: WEDNESDAY CONSULTANTS,INC. COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM•6:00 PM TRAFFIC: ALL TRIPS 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS Livingston Road &Pine Ridge Road Livingston Road II Pine Ridge Road I INTER- 15MIN1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHTI TOTAL TOTAL 4:00 PMI 67_ 156 74 297 57 141 50 248 79 343 113 535 I 68 285 49 400 1480 4:15 PM 81 182 78 339 73 117 55 245 ' 47 407 106 560 50 213 51 314 1,458 :4:30 PM 68 157 50 275 80 112 45 237 76 421 92 589 52 244 45 341 1,442 4:45 PM 78 128 53 269 63 126 38 227 65 386 84 535 46 322 52 420 1,441 5:00 PM 70 173 72 315 65 126 42 233 60 374 89 523 54 257 45 356 1,427 5:16 PM 78 204 83 365 73 99 50 222 45 462 100 607 52 251 63 366 1,560 5:30 PM 46 180 61 287 59 127 41 227 64 475 78 617 51 278 65 394 1,525 5:45 PM B3 164 60 307 47 113 45 205 fl 82 310 74 466 44 260 62 366 1,344 TOTAL: 571 1,344 529 2,444 , 517 961 366 1,844 II 518 3,178 736 4,432 415 2,110 432 2,957 11,677 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS Livingston Road&Pine Ridge Road Livingston Road II Pine Ridge Road I INTER- HOUR I NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL TOTAL 4:00 PM 294 623 253 1,170 273 496 188 957 267 1,557 395 2,219 ' 214 1,064 197 1,475 5,821 4:15 PM 297 640 251 1,188 281 481 180 942 248 1,588 371 2,207 202 1,036 193 1,431 5,768 4:30 PM 294 662 258 1,214 281 463 175 919 246 1,643 365 2,254 204 1,074 205 1,483 5,870 4:45 PM 272 685 269 1,226 260 478 171 909 234 1,697 351 6:00 PM 277 721 276 1,274 244 465 178 887 251 1,621 341 2,213 201 1,046 235 1,482 5,856 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR I Livingston Road I( Pine Ridge Road 1 INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 14:45 PM' 272 685 269 1,226 260 478 171 909 234 1,697 351 2,282 203 1,108 226 1,536 INZERIM • • Packet Page-3235- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Agob —F1 TRANSPORTATION DATE; March 30,2011 DAY: WEDNESDAY CONSULTANTS,INC. COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM-6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM-5:45 PM TRAFFIC: ALL TRIPS INTERSECTION: Livingston Road&Pine Ridge Road Livingston Road 2,053 34% i I 909 1,144 N 1 T 171 478 260 «J 1 4/0*Pine Ridge Road tom 225 item 1,108 41111111X 41.0. J , 203 1,536 3,833 234 64% 1,697 Mk 3,762 63% 2,282 351 • 2,226 '1 r* 272 685 269 Note: Total Intersection Traffic Percents(%)represent movement volumes 5,953 divided by the total intersection traffic I I 1,032 1 1,226 2,258 38% Packet Page -3236- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. PINE RIDGE ROAD @ WHIPPOORWILL LANE Packet Page-3237- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. ."h TRANSPORTATION DATE: Mires TUESDAY CONSULTANTS,INC. COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM-9:00 AM TRAFFIC: ALL TRIPS 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS Whippoorwill Lane&Pine Ridge Road I Whippoorwill Lane I Pine Ridge Road I INTER- 15 MIN BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 35 0 32 67 8 1 18 27 10 143 18 171 20 315 18 353 618 7:15 AM 57 3 33 93 11 0 23 34 15 188 15 216 25 344 21 390 733 7:30 AM 82 0 47 129 17 0 22 39 13 153 21 187 20 483 87 690 945 7:45 AM 95 4 42 141 B 0 28 36 18 194 26 238 29 595 20 644 1,059 8:00 AM 95 0 48 143 14 1 16 31 20 214 25 259 38 494 29 581 994 8:15 AM 70 0 26 96 8 2 25 35 22 209 49 280 43 506 30 579 990 8:30 AM 61 2 47 110 14 2 26 42 13 245 35 293 29 467 52 538 983 8:45 AM 72 2 30 104 13 1 35 49 43 222 27 292 33 505 34 572 1,017 TOTAL: 567 11 305 883 93 7 193 293 154 1,566 216 1,936 237 3,699 291 . 4,227 7,339 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS Whippoorwill Lane&Pine Ridge Road HOUR I Whippoorwill Lane I Pine Ridge Road INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT 1 TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT 1 TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 269 7 164 430 44 1 91 136 56 878 80 812 _ 94 1,737 146 1,977 3,355 7:15 AM 329 7 170 506 50 1 89 140 68 747 87 900 112 1,916 157 2,185 3,731 7:30 AM 342 4 163 509 47 3 91 141 73 770 121 964 130 2,078 166 2,374 3,988 ',*` 7:45 AM 321 6 163 490 44 6 95 144 73 882 135 1,070 139 2,052 131 2,322 4,026 8:00 AM 298 4 151 453 49 6 102 157 98 890 136 1,124 143 1,962 145 2,250 3,984 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR Whippoorwill Lane I Pine Ridge Road I INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 17:45AM1 321 6 163 490 44 5 95 144 73 862 135 1,070 139 2,052 131 2,322 4,028 Packet Page-3238- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. "fl DATE: March 29,2011 TRANSPORTATION DAY: TUESDAY CONSULTANTS,INC. COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM-9:00 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:45 AM-8:45 AM TRAFFIC: ALL TRIPS INTERSECTION: Whippoorwill Lane&Pine Ridge Road Whippoorwill Lane 354 9% I 'I 144 210 N I t 95 5 44 4 1 4 Pine Ridge Road L131 ains 40ea 2,052 441111111 �_� 2,468 139 2,322 73 4-1, 3,538 3,391 88% 862 84% 1,070 135 isit 1,069 321 6 163 Total intersection Traffic Note: 4,026 Percents(%)represent movement volumes divided by the total intersection traffic I li 279 490 1 769 19% Packet Page-3239- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TiTRANSPORTATION DATE; March 29,2011 DAY: TUESDAY CONSULTANTS,INC. COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM-6:00 PM TRAFFIC: ALL TRIPS 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS Whippoorwill Lane&Pine Ridge Road 15 MIN --- Whippoorwill Lane Pine Rid•a Road I INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND , SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL i LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL TOTAL 4:00 PM 43 0 37 80 27 1 28 56 38 615 65 618 26 348 28 402 1,156 4:15 PM 40 0 32 72 23 2 20 45 39 491 79 609 30 348 18 396 1,122 4:30 PM 42 3 37 82 27 3 12 42 46 655 65 656 33 291 29 353 1,133 4:45 PM 39 0 50 89 25 1 20 46 44 498 71 613 35 346 27 408 1,156 5:00 PM 40 1 52 93 40 3 13 58 31 511 63 605 41 301 20 362 1,116 5:15 PM 49 3 46 98 23 3 16 44 48 601 88 737 35 295 28 358 1,237 5:30 PM 37 5 40 82 27 1 19 47 43 578 92 713 36 344 22 402 1,244 5:45 PM 63 1 48 112 33 4 13 50 43 389 65 497 60 359 19 428 1,087 TOTAL: 353 13 342 708 225 18 143 386 332 4,138 578 5,048 286 2,632 191 3,109 9,251 HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS Whippoorwill Lane&Pine Ridge Road HOUR ( Whippoorwill Lane l Pine Ridge Road I INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT l TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL j LEFT THRU RIGHT l TOTAL TOTAL 4:00 PM 164 3 158 323 102 7 80 189 167 2,059 270 2,496 124 1,333 102 1,559 4,567 4:15 PM 181 4 171 336 115 9 65 189 160 2,055 268 2,483 139 1,286 94 1,519 4,627 'f;A, ;: 4:30 PM 170 7 185 362 115 10 63 188 169 2,165 277 2,611 144 1,233 104 1,481 4,642 4:45 PM 166 9 188 362 115 8 70 193 166 2,188 314 2,668 147 1,286 97 1,530 4,753 5:00 PM 189 10 186 385 123 11 63 197 165 2,079 308 2,552 162 1299 89 1,550 4,684 , PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR I Whippoorwill Lane l Pine Ridge Road INTER- BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL: LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL -LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 14:45PM1 165 9 188 362 116 8 70 193 166 2,188 314 2,668 147 1,286 97 1,630 4,753 • Packet Page-3240- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. --h, DATE: March 29,2011 TRANSPORTATION DAY: TUESDAY CONSULTANTS,INC. COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM-6:00 PM PEAK HOUR: 4:45 PM•5:45 PM TRAFFIC: ALL TRIPS INTERSECTION: Whippoorwill Lane&Pine Ridge Road Whippoorwill Lane 465 10% I I 193 272 N 1 I 70 8 115 4 1 Itik Pine Ridge Road to 97 aiitil 4.1. 1,286 ail 1,521 S 147 1,530 168 NI 4m11•0°4,189 4,021 88% 2,188 y 85% 2,668 314 Ilmgt 2,491 4111 1 irk 165 9 188 Total Intersection Traffic Note: 4,753 Percents(%)represent movement volumes I divided by the total intersection traffic 469 362 I 831 17% Packet Page-3241- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. AN TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS Packet Page-3242- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD ITE TRIP GENERATION REPORT, 8th EDITION Land Use Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Shopping Center I Ln(T)=0.59 Ln(X)+232 ` Ln(T)=0.67 Ln(X)+3.37 I Ln(T)=0.65 Ln(X)+5.83 (LUC 820) (61%In/39%Out) I (49%In/51%Out) J T=Number of TH.s, X=1,000's of square feet of GLA Medical Dental Office Building T=2.30 0.88 Ln(X)+1.59 I (X) I Ln(T)= T=40.89(X)-214.97 (LUC 720) (79%In/21%Out) (27%In/83%Out) T=Number of Tri.s, X=1,000's of square feet of GLA - 0 General Office Building Ln(T)=0.80 Ln(X)+ 1.55 T=1.12(X)+78.81 O ( ) (LUC 710) (88%1n/12%Out) (17%In/83%Out) Ln T .77 Ln X +3.65 T=Number of Trios, X=1,000's of square feet of GLA • Packet Page-3243- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Afiekg Packet Page-3244- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Environmental Assessment Report For the 3480 Pine Ridge Road N3.65 ac.r c Tract Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Road, p y. SFWMD Application No. 070424-15 Prepared For: Mr. Michael Curran First Community Bank 61 Hancock Parkway West Cape Coral, FL 33991 (239) 210-2228 April 28, 2011 Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 Engineers Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 (239)254-2000 conducted by: Geza W ass de Czege,President Southern Biomes, Inc. - 1602 Woodford Ave., Ft. Myers, FL 33901 Office: (239)334-6766 Fax: (239)337-5028 Packet Page-3245- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16,2011 Table of Contents Section Page Table of Contents 1 -List of Tables 1 -List of Report Exhibits 2 -List of Attached 24"x 36"Plan Exhibits 2 A Property Location 3 B Habitat Description 3 C Indigenous Habitat Assessment 8 D Wetland Impacts, Reduction&Minimization Assessment 9 E Wetland Mitigation Assessment 10 F Water Quality 12 G Listed Species Assessment 13 H Special Treatment(ST) Overlay 19 oaloot I Historic and Archeological Documentation 20 List of Figures Figure Description Page G.1 Listed Species Survey Transect Location Map 15 H.1 Letter from Florida State Division of Archeological & Historic 20 - 1 - Packet Page-3246- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P. 0. Box 50640,Fort Myers, FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract,Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 List of Tables Table Description Page B.1 Habitat Summary List 6 B.2 Proposed Habitats Impact and Preservation Assessment 7 C.1 Indigenous Habitat Assessment Summary 8 D.1 WMD Wetland &OSW Impact Analysis 9 E.1 UMAM&WRAP Analysis 10 E.2 Wetland Preservation and Mitigation Assessment 11 G.1 Endangered Species Observations and Comments 14 H.1 Special Treatment(ST) Overlay Habitats Assessment 19 List of Report Exhibits Exhibits Description Page A Soils Description 22 B Estimated Mitigation Area Work Schedule 23 C Indigenous Areas Enhancement&Management Guidelines 24 D Detailed Enhancement, Restoration &Maintenance Guidelines 25 E Pre-Construction and Construction Environmental Guidelines 30 - 2 - Packet Page-3247- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640, Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract,Sec. 18,T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd,Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16,2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR COLLIER COUNTY A.PROPERTY LOCATION: The subject property is an irregular, mostly forested parcel of land located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, approximately two thirds of a mile west of Interstate 75, in Collier County. To the north, east and west are commercial properties, and abutting the northwestern side is a fire station with a forested wetland preserve on its south side. To the south is a multi-family development. Indigenous forested preserves and buffers are located along the northwesterly, southwesterly, southeasterly and southerly fringes. B. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: The following text provides a description of the vegetative communities and cover types found on the property using the Florida Land Use Forms, and Cover Classification System (FLUCCS) codes to identify them. A map of the vegetation associations delineated on an aerial photograph is provided with this submittal. UPLANDS (8.21+acres): There are 8.21 acres of uplands, of which approximately 5.58±acres (68%) are disturbed, exotic invaded, or associated with an abandoned nursery and residence. The remaining 2.63 acres of uplands consist of exotic invaded pine and pine-cypress mixed forest communities dominated by slash pine, cypress,melaleuca, Java plum, ear-leaf acacia, cabbage palm, and Brazilian pepper, A more detailed description of each designated FLUCCS code follows: Code Description 110 0.42 acres consist of a single family residence and yard dominated by ornamental trees,shrubs,and groundcover. Only small portions or the yard area are covered by Floratam grass. 241/ 1.92 acres consists of an abandoned nursery covered by a dense canopy of Java plum,ear-leaf acacia, 438 melaleuca, slash pine,woman's tongue,Cuban laurel and other exotic ornamentals. Groundcover is dominated by leaf litter, fox grape,ornamental plants such as philodendron and mother-in-law tongue, and scattered areas of potted plants under a thicket of Brazilian pepper. Exotics make up more than 75% of the existing vegetation. 419/ 0.35 acres are associated with a mix of pine,cypress and Brazilian pepper. Associated canopy and 422 midstory vegetation consists of cabbage palm, ear-leaf acacia, and Java plum. Groundcover consisting primarily of leaf litter,with scattered areas of Floratam grass,caesarweed,poison ivy, broomsedge,fox grape and wiregrass. Exotic invasion is less than 50%of the total canopy and midstory vegetation. 422 0.45 acres of a dense thicket of Brazilian pepper. Canopy vegetation consists of widely scattered slash pine extending above the thicket. Groundcover is predominantly leaf litter. Exotics make up more than 75%of the existing vegetation. 422/ 1.15 acres consist of a previously cleared area with a dense thicket of Brazilian pepper. This area 740 appears to have been fenced and used to contain livestock of some kind. The dominant canopy and midstory vegetation consists of Cuban laurel,cabbage palm,ear-leaf acacia,umbrella tree and - 3 - Packet Page-3248- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640, Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 Brazilian pepper. Groundcover is primarily leaf litter,fox grape,Guinea grass, and caesarweed. Exotics make up more than 75%of the existing vegetation. 424/ 0.76 acres consist of a melaleuca invaded disturbed area along the western side of the property that 740 was previously cleared for growing potted plants. Irrigation pipes and discarded nurse pots can be found throughout the area. The canopy is primarily of melaleuca,with some scattered slash pine,and Java plum. Midstory vegetation consists of melaleuca,Brazilian pepper,wax myrtle,downy-rose myrtle, laurel oak,and live oak;with the latter two possibly planted,since most of them had flagging tape tied to them. The dominant groundcover vegetation consists of wire grass,smutgrass,bunch paspalum,broomsedge,fox grape,caesarweed,dogfennel,false buttonweed,chocolateweed,guinea grass,natal grass,ragweed,cida, Croton,dodder,and catbrier. Exotics make up more than 75%of the existing vegetation. 426/ 0.65 acres consist of a disturbed area fringing the western side of the abandoned nursery that was 424 dominated by ear-leaf acacia and melaleuca. Other associated trees and midstory vegetation consisted of scattered Java plum,cabbage palm, and slash pine. Groundcover vegetation was open but predominantly with leaf litter and scattered areas of fox grape, chocolateweed,wire grass, smutgrass, Floratam grass,broomsedge and caesarweed. Exotics make up more than 75% of the existing vegetation. 4159 2.28 acres consist of an exotic invaded pine forest,consisting of a mature stand of slash pines,with scattered cabbage palm,laurel oak, Brazilian pepper,downy-rose myrtle,ear-leaf acacia,wax myrtle, and myrsine dominating the midstory. Groundcover consisted of wire grass,Floratam grass, broomsedge,fox grape,poison ivy and catbrier,mixed with areas dominated by a dense cover leaf litter. Exotic invasion is less than 50% of the total canopy and midstory vegetation. 814 0.23 acres along the eastern side of the property consists of a graded driveway to access the residence and nursery. The driveway had a layer of crushed limerock. Only ruderal groundcover vegetation was growing in this area,consisting of Floratam grass, smutgrass,caesarweed,sida,ragweed, beggartick, broomsedge,and fox grape. - 4 - Packet Page-3249- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640,Fort Myers, FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract,Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County,FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 WMD Other Surface Waters(OSW) (0.70± ac.) There are two OSW cover types,totaling approximately 0.91 acres, located on site. One of the two (FLUCCS 510) have been separated into two categories because some of the ditches were excavated within wetlands, and therefore are considered jurisdictional. Code Description 510 0.22 acres consist of small drainage ditches or swales that were excavated to help drain the nursery during the rainy season. Groundcover consists of leaf litter mixed with wetland vegetation consists of torpedograss,matchweed,penneywort,mixed with an assortment of small sedges and rushes. 520 0.48 acres consist of two small borrow ponds that were excavated for fill material for the residence and nursery, and for irrigation of the nursery. Open water dominates the majority of the area,with dense Brazilian pepper and Carolina willow fringe the shoreline. WMD WETLANDS ( 4.74± ac.) There are three wetland cover types totaling approximately 4.53 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. However, there is an additional 0.21 acres of drainage ditches which also are jurisdictional, making it a total of 4.74 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. Code Description 510J Small Drainage Ditches or Swales(0.21 ac.): consist of small ditches and swales that were excavated to help drain the nursery during the rainy season. Groundcover consists of leaf litter mixed with wetland vegetation consists of torpedograss, matchweed,penneywort,mixed with an assortment of small sedges and rushes. These ditches extend through jurisdictional wetlands, and therefore are considered jurisdictional as well. 6219 Exotic Invaded Cypress Forest(1.39 ac.): this community consists of a cypress dominated forested wetland,which extends off site as part of an adjoining wetland preserve. The midstory and understory consists of scattered melaleuca, Brazilian pepper,cabbage palm,buttonbush,strangler fig, wax myrtle,salt bush,swamp fern,and saw grass. Exotic invasion is less than 50%of the total canopy and midstory vegetation. 6249 Exotic Invaded Pine-Cypress Forest(1.94 ac.): this community consists of a mixed slash pine and cypress forest,with melaleuca and Brazilian pepper invasion throughout. Other associated canopy and midstory vegetation consists of scattered cabbage palm, laurel oak,Java plum,downy-rose myrtle,myrsine, wax myrtle,salt bush,. Groundcover is sparse;primarily leaf litter,with scattered swamp fem and saw grass. Exotic invasion is less than 50% of the total canopy and midstory vegetation. 6249/ Brazilian pepper Invaded Pine-Cypress Forest(1.20 ac.): this community consists of a 422 Brazilian pepper invaded slash pine and cypress dominated forest,with scattered areas of melaleuca at varying densities of invasion. The midstory and understory consists of young melaleuca, downy rosemyrtle,myrsine,wax myrtle,salt bush, swamp fern, and saw grass. Brazilian pepper dominates the midstory,with less than or near 75%at this stratum. - 5 - Packet Page-3250- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640,Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 Table B.1 : HABITAT SUMMARY LIST Code Habitat Description Acres UPLANDS (8.21 AC.) 110 Single Family Residence&Yard 0.42 241/438 Abandoned Nursery Gone Wild (>75%) 1.92 4159 Exotic Invaded Pine Forest (<50%) 2.28 419/422 Pine-Cypress Forest w/Brazilian Pepper (<50%) 0.35 422 Brazilian Pepper Invaded Thicket(>75%) 0.45 422/740 Brazilian Pepper Invaded Disturbed Site(>75%) 1.15 424/740 Melaleuca Invaded Disturbed Site(>75%) 0.76 426/424 Ear-leaf Acacia-Melaleuca Invaded Forest(>75%) 0.65 814 Filled &Graded Access Road 0.23 OTHER SURFACE WATERS (OSW) (0.70 AC.) 510 Drainage Ditches/Swales 0.22 520 Borrow/Irrigation Pond 0.48 WETLANDS (4.74 AC.), 510J Drainage Ditches/Swales (SFWMD Jurisdiction) 0.21 6219 Exotic Invaded Cypress Forest (<50%) 1.39 6249 Exotic Llvaded Pine-Cypress Forest(<50%) 1.94 6249/422 Pine-Cypress-Melaleuca w/Brazilian p. (50-75%) L20 TOTAL ACREAGE 13.65 NOTE 1: There are four wetland cover types totaling 4.74 acres; all are jurisdictional wetlands per a formal jurisdiction determination established during a site inspection with the SFWMD on August 23,2007. NOTE 2: SFWMD staff suggested that new policy will require FLUCCS codes which specifically denote exotics, such as 424(melaleuca)and 422(Brazilian pepper)are not to be used because it does not provide sufficient information as to what the habitat was prior to infestation of exotics. Southern Biomes has,for several years, identified exotic invaded habitats by using the historic habitat FLUCCS code,along with a forth alpha-numeric code, such as"8"for Brazilian pepper and"9"for melaleuca. If the habitat is significantly infested,then a dual-numeric FLUCCS code is used, such as 6249/422,which in this case suggests that it is a Pine-Cypress-Melaleuca habitat with Brazilian pepper dominating in the sub-canopy;and in overall densities greater than 50%. Therefore,we feel that this format more appropriately describes the habitat in its current conditions than to totally ignore the exotic species FLUCCS codes. The FLUCCS code 422 used in this report represents an area next to Pine Ridge Road,that was previously cleared and dominated by ruderal weeds,and could just as well been classified as FLUCCS code 422/740,since it was previously disturbed. - 6 - Packet Page-3251- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave.,Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.O. Box 50640, Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 Table B.2: Proposed Habitats Impact and Preservation Assessment WMD Wetland Impact Analysis Code Habitat Total Acres Impact Preserved Modified 510J Drainage Ditches/Swales(SFWMD Juris.) 0.21 0.19 0.02 86% 6219 Exotic Invaded Cypress Forest(<50%) 1.39 0.39 1.00 29% 6249 Exotic Invaded Pine-Cypress Forest(<50%) 1.94 0.77 1.17 40% 6249/422 Pine-Cypress-Melaleuca w/Braz.p. (50-75%) 1.20 1.05 0.15 87% Total Jurisdiction Wetland Areas 4.74 2.40 2.34 51% WMD OSW Impact Analysis Code Habitat Total Acres Impact Preserved Modified 510 Drainage Ditches/Swales 0.22 0.06 0.16 36% 520 Borrow/Irrigation Pond 0A8 0.48 0.00 100% Total OSW 0.70 0.54 0.16 78% Upland Impact& Preservation Analysis Code Habitat Total Acres Impact Preserved Modified 110 Single Family Residence&Yard 0.42 0.42 0.00 100% 241/438 Abandoned Nursery Gone Wild(>75%) 1.92 1.92 0.00 100% 419/422 Pine-Cypress Forest w/Braz. Pepper(<50%) 0.35 0.14 0.21 40% 422 Brazilian Pepper Invaded Thicket(>75%) 0.45 0.45 0.00 100% 422/740 Brazilian Pepper Disturbed Site(>75%) 1.15 1.15 0.00 100% 424/740 Melaleuca Invaded Disturbed Site(>75%) 0.76 0.63 0.13 82% 426/424 Ear-leaf Acacia-Melaleuca Forest(>75%) 0.65 0.65 0.00 100% 4159 Exotic Invaded Pine Forest (<50%) 2.28 2.02 0.26 88% 814 Filled&Graded Access Road 0.23 0.23 0.00 100% Total Uplands 8.21 7.61 0.60 92% Total Uplands,Wetlands&OSW 13.65 10.55 3.10 77% - 7 - Packet Page -3252- i 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.O. Box 50640,Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18,T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 C. Indigenous Habitat Assessment: Preservation standards for mixed use developments equal to or greater than 5 acres and less than 20 acres require 15%preservation of indigenous vegetation. The project has retained more than 32%of the site as indigenous vegetation, consisting of pine and cypress upland and wetland forest, The proposed project intends to preserve 0.47 acres of upland indigenous habitats and 2.32 acres of indigenous wetland habitats, of which 2.79 acres will be under a conversation easement(see Table C.1 below). The required 15% indigenous habitats(1.07 ac.) are exceeded by 1.70 acres. Table C.1: Indigenous Habitat Assessment Summary: Indigenous Upland Habitats (±2.63 ac.) NON- FLUCCS DESCRIPTION %EXOTICS TOTAL IMPACTED IMPACTED 4159 Exotic Invaded Pine Forest (E-2) 2.28 2.02 0.26 419/422 Pine-Cypress Forest w/Brazilian P. (E-2) 0.35 0.14 0.21 TOTAL UPLANDS ACRES 2.63 2.16 0.47 Indigenous Wetland Habitats (+4.53 ac.) NON- FLUCCS DESCRIPTION %EXOTICS TOTAL IMPACTED IMPACTED 6219 Exotic Invaded Cypress Forest (E-2) 1.39 039 1.00 6249 Exotic Invaded Pine-Cypress Forest (E-2) 1.94 0.77 1.17 6249/422 Pine-Cypress-Mela.w/Brazilian p. (E-3) 1.20 1.05 0.15 TOTAL WETLANDS ACRES 4.53 2.21 2.32 TOTAL INDIGENOUS ACREAGE 7.16 4.37 2.79 Indigenous Habitat Required(15%x 7.16 = 1.07 acres) 1.07 Indigenous Habitat Requirements Exceeded by 1.72 Indigenous Habitat Placed in Conservation Easement 2.79 Vegetative Communities Exotic Invasion Key E-1 0-24%Exotic Invasion E-2 25-49%Exotic Invasion E-3 50-74%Exotic Invasion E-4 >75%Exotic Invasion A restoration, enhancement, maintenance and monitoring plan has been attached to this report, which includes both indigenous and exotic invaded habitats, as well as lake littoral and upland buffer creation areas. - 8 - Packet Page-3253- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.O. Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege,President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract,Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 D.Wetland Impacts,Reduction &Minimization Assessment: This property is isolated on all four sides by commercial or high density residential development, but is fringed on portions of three sides by small off-site wetland preserves. There are four(4) SFWMD Jurisdictional wetlands totaling 4.74 acres,two (2) OSWs totaling 0.70 acres. Because of the shape and size of the property, constraints of the development's setback requirements, and locations of the wetlands, approximately 2.40 acres(51%) of wetlands and 0.54 acres (78%) of OSW will have unavoidable impacted with the proposed development plan. Additional reductions to the size of the proposed development have been made by reducing the width of the roads, and berms, as well as the development's footprint. Any additional reductions would make the project economically unrealistic. The tables below illustrate the status of each of the habitats and the impacts associated with them. Although the OSW wetlands are listed as impacted, they will not require mitigation. Table D.l: WMD Wetland & OSW Impact Analysis Code Habitat Total Acres Impact Preserved Modified 510J Drainage Ditches/Swales(SFWMD Juris.) 0.21 0.19 0.02 86% 6219 Exotic Invaded Cypress Forest(<50%) 1.39 0.39 1.00 29% 6249 Exotic Invaded Pine-Cypress Forest(<50%) 1.94 0.77 1.17 40% 6249/422 Pine-Cypress-Melaleuca w/Braz. p. (50-75%) 1.20 1.05 0.15 87% Total Jurisdiction Wetland Areas 4.74 2.40 2.34 51% Alft- Code Habitat Total Acres Impact Preserved Modified 510 Drainage Ditches/Swales 0.22 0.06 0.16 36% 520 Borrow/Irrigation Pond 0.48 0.48 0.00 100% Total OSW 0.70 0.54 0.16 78% Total Wetland &OSW Areas 5.44 2.94 2.50 54% To minimize adverse impacts to the retained wetland habitats, the preserves were clustered together to provide the largest contiguous preserves that are connected to adjoining off-site preserves. Connectivity between the preserves separated by the access road are maintained via culverts and minimized by supplemental plants along the side slopes. In addition,the proposed retention lake, with its enhanced littoral area, has been incorporated as part of the wildlife corridor to provide additional buffers from the commercial development. The created buffer areas and littoral areas will be planted with indigenous upland and wetland species in an effort to further reduce the gap and enlarge the corridor. The table below provides a summary of the impacts and preservation analysis of all the FLUCCS areas within the property. - 9 - Packet Page -3254- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640, Fort Myers,FL 33994 239 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Gaza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 E. Wetland Mitigation Assessment: A UMAM assessment for onsite mitigation and a WRAP assessment of off-site mitigation is provided to determine the compensation requirements for any unavoidable direct and secondary impacts of the proposed project. Guidelines are described within the attached preserve area enhancement and management plan. The results of the UMAM and WRAP assessments are as follows: Table E.la: UMAM Impacted Wetlands Assessment UMAM Impacted Habitats Scores: FLUCCS Impacted Acreage Location/landscape Water Environ Community Structure Code Current w/Pres Current w/Pres Current w/Pres Current w/Pres 510J 0.19 0.00 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 6219 0.39 0.00 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 6249 0.77 0.00 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 6249/422 0.501 0.00 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 6249/422 0.552 0.00 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 TOTALS 2.40 0.00 UMAM Impacted Wetlands Functional Assessment Scores (cont.):3 Code Habitat Score Delta Ftn.Loss R.F.Gain Lift Current w/Pres differential FL RFG Gained 510J 0.37 0.00 0.37 -0.07 0.00 0.00 6219 0.43 0.00 0.43 -0.17 0.00 0.00 6249 0.43 0.00 0.43 -0.33 0.00 0.00 6249/422 0.40 0.00 0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.00 6249/422 0.40 0.00 0.40 -0.22 0.00 0.00 TOTALS -0.99 0.00 The remaining 0.50 acres of the 1.05 acres of impacts,as well as all the remaining wetland impacts,are assessed with WRAP for off-site mitigation 2 The 0.55 acres of the 1.05 acres of impacts are mitigated for on-site per the UMAM assessment results. 3 Numeric values may not appear correct due to rounding adjustments,but the final results are correct. - 10 - Packet Page-3255- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P.O. Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 . - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 Table E.lb: UMAM Wetland Mitigation (less 2ndry Impacted areas)Assessment UMAM Wetland Preserves Mitigation Scores: FLUCCS Acreage Location/landscape Water Environ Community Structure Code Current w/Pres Current w/Pres Current w/Pres Current w/Pres 510J 0.21 0.01 4.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 8.0 510 0.09 0.09 4.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 8.0 6219 1.39 0.71 4.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 9.0 6249 1.94 0.96 4.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 9.0 6249/422 1.20 0.03 4.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 8.0 TOTALS 4.83 1.80 UMAM Wetland Preserves Functional Assessment Scores:4 Code Habitat Score Delta Ftn.Loss R.F.Gain Lift Current w/Pres differential FL RFG Gained 510J 0.37 0.53 0.17 -0.03 0.09 0.00 510 0.33 0.53 0.20 <0.01 0.13 0.01 6219 0.43 0.57 0.13 -0.09 0.05 0.06 6249 0.43 0.57 0.13 -0.13 0.09 0.09 6249/422 0.40 0.53 0.13 -0.16 0.09 0.00 TOTALS -0.41 0.16 Table E.1c: UMAM Upland Preserves Mitigation Assessment UMAM Upland Habitat Scores: FLUCCS Acreage Location/landscape Water Environ Community Structure Code Current w/Pres Current w/Pres Current w/Pres Current w/Pres 4159 0.26 0.26 4.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 8.0 419/422 0.21 0.21 4.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 424/740 0.13 0.13 4.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 510 0.07 0.07 4.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 TOTALS 0.67 0.67 UMAM Upland Preserves Functional Assessment Scores:5 Code Habitat Score Delta Ftn.Loss R.F.Gain Lift Current w/Pres differential FL RFG Gained 4159 0.45 0.55 0.10 -0.00 0.07 0.02 419/740 0.40 0.55 0.15 0.00 0.10 0.02 424/740 0.40 0.55 0.15 -0.00 0.10 0.01 510 0.40 0.55 0.15 -0.00 0.10 0.01 TOTALS 0.00 0.06 Functional loss for proposed impact 0.99 acres Functional gain for proposed on-site wetland mitigation 0.16 acres Functional gain for proposed on-site upland mitigation 0.06 acres Functional loss provided by proposed off-site mitigation 0.77 acres "Numeric values may not appear correct due to rounding adjustments,but the final results are correct. 5 Numeric values may not appear correct due to rounding adjustments,but the final results are correct. - 11 - Packet Page -3256- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640, Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege,President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Revised:d , Naples,, Collier County, FL Mitigation Assessment Rationale: The UMAM assessment scores were limited to wetland impacts which could be mitigated on site. Therefore, all wetland impacts, less the 0.55 acres of the FLUCCS 6249/4422 impacts that were mitigated on-site, and the 0.63 acres of potential secondary impacts, were assessed for off-site mitigation, using the WRAP assessment methodology(See Table 4.3.3d). The tables above (Tables 4.3.3a-c)provide the UMAM scores in a simple to understand format. The first table includes all wetland impacts that were not mitigated on-site. The second table provides UMAM scores for on-site wetland preserves, while the third table for upland preserves. There was a total loss of habitat functional value of 0.99 acres, and a gain of functional value of 0.22 acres. Therefore, 0.77 functional acres lost will be mitigated off-site and assessed by using the WRAP. The current habitat values were rated low due to isolation of the site,the proximity to commercial developments and major highways,the degree of exotic invasion, and overall hydrologic degradation due to drainage and land use alterations. Functional gain of habitats within the post-development • preserves consisted of habitat restoration and enhancements, and hydrologic restoration associated with water management control structures, providing stormwater discharge into the wetlands, and raising the discharge control elevation to at least 6"higher than current conditions. Water quality is assumed to be the same or better with the construction of an approved stormwater water management plan. The t-factor was valued between 1 and 1.3, based on the predication that the wetlands can be reestablished to function as viable wetlands within 6 to 10 years. The Risk Value was assessed between 1.0 and 1.5, based on the current conditions, site location, and general size of the overall system. - 12 - Packet Page-3257- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P. 0.Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994 , Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 Table E.1d: Proposed WRAP Analysis for Pre and Post Development Wetlands Pre-development WRAP Functional Assessment Scores: Code Total Wildlife Wetland Wetland Upland Wetland Water Average Habitat Adjusted Acres Utilization Canopy Gr oundcover Buffer Hydrology Quality F'tnl Value Acres 510J 0.19 1.5 0.0 1,0 2.0 1.5 2,7 1.7 0.58 0.11 6219 0.39 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.7 2.0 0.65 0.25 6249 0.77 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.7 2.0 0,65 0.50 6249/422 0.50 1.5 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 2.7 1.7 0.59 0.30 1.85 1.16 Pre-development 2ndry Impact WRAP Functional Assessment Scores: Code Total Wildlife Wetland Wetland Upland Wetland Water Average Habitat Adjusted Acres Utilization Canopy Gr oundcover Buffer Hydrology Quality F'tnl Value Acres 510J 0.01 1.5 0.0 0.5 2.0 1.5 2.7 1.6 0.55 0.01 6219 0.29 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.7 2.0 0.65 0.19 6249 0.21 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.7 2.0 0.65 0.14 6249/422 0.12 1.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 2.7 1.6 0.54 0.07 0.63 0.41 Post-development 2ndry Impact WRAP Functional Assessment Scores: Code Total Wildlife Wetland Wetland Upland Wetland Water Average Habitat Adjusted Acres Utilization Canopy Gr oundcover Buffer Hydrology Quality F'tnl Value Acres 510J 0.01 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.3 1.5 0.49 0.01 6219 0.29 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 2.0 2.3 1.6 0.54 0.16 6249 0.21 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 2.0 2.3 1.6 0.54 0.11 6249/422 0.12 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.3 1.5 0.49 0.06 0.63 0.34 Total Potential Functional Value Lost 1.16 Total Potential 2ndry Impact Functional Value Lost(pre minus post) 0.07 Total Mitigation Credits Required for Direct&2ndry Wetland Impacts @ 1:1 Ratio 1.23 Credits Mitigation Assessment Rationale: UMAM was used to assess compensation available from on-site mitigation. All wetland impacts, less the 0.55 acres of the FLUCCS 6249/422 impacts that were mitigated on-site, plus the potential secondary impacts to wetlands, will require off-site mitigation. The WRAP analysis was used to determine the amount of off-site mitigation credits required. Pre-development WRAP functional values have been assessed, and range mostly from average to above average. The 1.85 acres of exotic invaded wetlands have a WRAP assessment score with a functional value of 1.16 acres, due to the overall degraded condition of the all wetlands. Pre and Post-development secondary impacts of 0.63 acres of wetlands fringing the development have a value of 0.06 acres. These scores are low due to isolation, lack of an upland buffer, and general alterations due to surrounding land uses. Off-site mitigation is provided at a 1:1 ratio because of the poor quality of the wetlands, thereby requiring 1.23 credits, or$73,800.00 (1.23 x $60,000.006/credit = $73,800.00). Proposed on-site mitigation consists of enhancement and restoration of preserved uplands and wetlands, plus the creation of upland buffers. These activities are outlined on the following table. 6 Fees are based on the current cost of mitigation credits at Panther Island Mitigation Bank. - 13 - Packet Page-3258- , 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.O.Box 50640, Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples,Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 Table E.2: Wetland Preservation and Mitigation Assessment Created Upland Code Existing Habitat Total Acres Buffer Preserve Activity 510J Drainage Ditches/Swales(SFWMD Jude.) 0.21 0.08 0.02 Restore 6219 Exotic Invaded Cypress Forest(<50%) 1.39 0.14 1.00 Enhance 6249 Exotic Invaded Pine-Cypress Forest(<50%) 1.94 0.14 1.17 Enhance 6249/422 Pine-Cypress-Melaleuca w/Braz.p.(50-75%) 120 0.04 0.15 Restore Total Wetlands 4.74 0.40 2.34 WMD OSW Preservation Analysis. Code Habitat Total Acres Buffer Preserve Activity 510 Drainage Ditches/Swales 0.22 0.04 0.167 Restore/enhance 520 BorrowAnigation Pond 0.48 0.00 0.00 N/A Total OSW 0.70 0.04 0.16 Upland Preservation Analysis Code Habitat Total Acres Buffer Preserve Activity 110 Single Family Residence&Yard 0.42 - 0.00 N/A 241/438 Abandoned Nursery Gone Wild(>75%) 1.92 - 0.00 N/A 4159 Exotic Invaded Pine Forest (<50%) 2.28 0.20 0.26 Enhance 419/422 Pine-Cypress Forest w/Braz. Pepper(<50%) 0.35 0.09 0.21 Enhance 422 Brazilian Pepper Invaded Thicket(>75%) 0.45 - 0.00 N/A 422/740 Brazilian Pepper Disturbed Site(>75%) 1.15 - 0.00 N/A 424/740 Melaleuca Invaded Disturbed Site(>75%) 0.76 0.11 0.13 Restore 426/424 Ear-leaf Acacia-Melaleuca Forest(>75%) 0.65 0.03 0.00 N/A 814 Filled&Graded Access Road 0.23 0.00 0.00 N/A Total Uplands 8.21 0.47 0.60 Total Created Indigenous Upland Buffers 0.91s Created Total Uplands,Wetlands&OSW 13.65 3.10 Total Enhance Uplands 0.54 Total Enhance Wetlands 2.17 Total Restored Wetlands 0.26 Total Restored Uplands 0.13 Total Lake Littoral Area 0.119 F. Water Quality: As previously mentioned in Section 4.2,1,this property is isolated on all four sides by commercial or high density residential development, but is fringed on portions of three sides by small off-site wetland preserves. A concrete retaining wall separates the off-site preserve located on the southeasterly side of the subject property. There are four(4) SFWMD 7 0.9 acres of FLUCCS 510 are proposed for wetland restoration,while 0.07 acres within preserve#4 are proposed for upland enhancement because no wetlands are within the preserve. 8 The side slopes of water management berms fringing preserves will be planted with indigenous upland plant species as described in the 0.91 Acres Indigenous Upland Buffer Creation Guidelines found at the end of this report. 9 Lake littoral areas fringing preserves will be planted with indigenous wetland marsh species for wildlife habitat and water quality enhancement. - 14 - Packet Page-3259- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640,Fort Myers, FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16,2011 wetlands totaling 4.74 acres, and two (2) OSWs totaling 0.70 acres. Currently a series of ditches and swales drain the site into the Pine Ridge Road swale,with a baffle at the outfall structure preventing equalization of surface hydrology. A 3.10 acre preserve with additional buffers and littoral areas are proposed along the western side and southern end of the property. They will connect to existing off-site preserves, in an effort to maintain historic flowways and wildlife corridors. Water quality will be improved by providing appropriate stormwater pre- treatment and retention, and setting control elevations to prevent further degradation and reestablish historic hydrology. All stormwater will be pre-treated within the stormwater management system adjacent to the preserve prior to discharging into the on-site wetlands and flowing off site into adjoining wetlands (see the proposed surface water drainage plan). Because this property has become isolated by surrounding developments, and there are no other wetlands that exist which have not already been reviewed during permitting of other projects, there will be no additional cumulative impacts on the water quality of any remaining areas, or to the drainage basin, which have not already been addressed. All existing and proposed developments that meet or exceed the required stormwater quality standards and retention requirements, should by regulatory requirements, not result in any unacceptable cumulative impacts to water quality or the functions of wetlands and other surface waters,within the same drainage basin. The West Collier Drainage Basin boundary encompasses an area of 661,452 acres, including areas mostly within Collier County,but also in Lee and Hendry Counties. Approximately 56%of the area consists of fresh or saltwater habitats, with 82% of the wetlands already under some type of protection, leaving approximately 54,156 acres vulnerable to future olow impacts. The proposed project will impact 0.0045%of the vulnerable wetlands. Based on the wetland habitat scoring methodology used in the West Collier Drainage Basin study, using the variables defined in the BOR(hydrologic connection, condition, uniqueness, location, and fish and wildlife utilization),the subject property's wetlands would be classified as Poor, if the internal ditches and swales qualify the wetlands as being within 100 ft., or as Low, if it doesn't. However, the wetlands scored low on all of the variables. There is no hydrologic connection to any significant wetland system, and ditches continually drain the site; the overall condition is deteriorated and exotic invaded;there are no unique features to the wetlands; the location is completely isolated within existing developments on all sides; and fish and wildlife utilization is very limited, considering the poor quality of all of the other variables. Therefore, any off-site mitigation provided, that scores Good to Excellent for wetland quality, such as would all mitigation banks in Collier County, would more than compensate for any minimal cumulative impacts associated from the loss of these wetlands. G. Listed Species Assessment: A listed species survey was conducted on April 27, 2008, and updated on March. 21, 2009 and April 26, 2011. During the most recent survey the temperature was in the high 80s to low 90s with partly cloudy skies and a southeasterly breeze at 5 to 10 mph. As noted in the listed species survey observations in the below text,there were no listed - 15 - Packet Page-3260- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640, Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16,2011 endangered or threatened species,or species of special concern observed on the subject property during any of the surveys. Although wading birds were not observed,they are expected to be observed within the borrow ponds and open wetland areas. The following methodology was used to provide a 90%or greater coverage of the entire parcel. Listed Species Survey Methodology:The study area was field surveyed for endangered species using a modified transect line method established by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. The modified survey(a meandering strip census) has proven to be effective in covering 90-95%of the sites surveyed. The transect survey uses meandering transect lines at 50'-75' intervals. On this project the meanders ran a north-south course. The meanders extend into adjoining transect survey areas to insure a near 100%coverage of the project site. The frequency of the meanders is determined by the ground cover and visibility. The more densely vegetated areas receive a greater frequency of meanders,thus decreasing the distance between meanders within some habitats to 12' apart. Surveying large areas require hanging flagging tape at the outer edges of the turn points of the meanders, to assist in identifying the extent of the surveyed areas. On the return transect, the flagging is typically removed and relocated to the other end of the meander turn points, until the last transect line is completed. Evidence of a specific species is also used to determine the size of the meanders. If, for example,tortoise droppings are observed, the meander frequencies may be increased to locate the burrow. Faunal species,which do not lend themselves to the typical transect line survey methodologies, which are successful in determining location and status of less mobile floral and faunal species, require an additional method of observation. These species require game stalking techniques with routine pauses for quiet observation. The frequency and duration of observations are also determined by habitat density, species being observed, and the stalking skills of the observer. The use of field glasses and the ability to blend into the surroundings are important elements for successful results. Any species observed are noted on an aerial photograph as to location and number of species observed. Species presence and species abundance, on a given site, can not be determined for all species listed. Fauna which are mobile, transient, or deceptive are not always observed during a typical field survey. This computation problem is especially true in determining species abundance. Therefore, the status of each species will be listed as to presence and numbers of species observed, and only those species which can be reasonable surveyed for abundance will be provided with such data. - 16 - Packet Page-3261- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P.O. Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994 , Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege,President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 Table G.1: Listed Species Observations and Comments Listed Species Observed or Expected to be Observed on Similar Habitats Common Name Scientific Name Obs. Comments* American alligator Alligator mississippiensis no not observed Gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus no not observed Gopher frog Rana areolata no not observed Least tern Sterna antillarum no not observed Great egret Casmerodius albus no not observed Marsh hawk(n'thrn harrier) Circus cyaneus no not observed Red-cockaded Woodpecker Dendrocopos borealis no not observed Little blue heron Egretta caerzt/ea no not observed Snowy egret Egretta thula no not observed Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor no not observed White Ibis Eudocimus albus no not observed Merlin Falco co/umbaris no not observed Southeastern kestrel Falco sparverius,paulus no not observed Eastern kestrel Falco sparverius,sparverius no not observed Arctic peregrine falcon Falco peregrines tundrius no transient species Southern bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus no not observed Wood stork blycteria americana no not observed Everglades Snail kite Rostrhanzus socictbilis plumbeus no not observed Florida panther Fe/is conco/or coryi no not observed Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia no not observed Florida black bear Ursus americanus f oxidants no not observed Giant Leather Fern Acrostichunr dazaeifolizmi yes not observed . . Fakahatchee burmannia Burmaznia flava no not observed Satinleaf Chrysophyllunz olivaeforme no not observed "0-- Twisted Twisted air plant Tillandsia flexuosa no not observed Simpson's Stopper Eugenia simpsoni no not observed Discussion and Conclusion: As noted above, no listed endangered or threatened species, or species of special concern were observed during the survey. Although not observed during the survey, the ditches and borrow ponds are primary habitats for many of the listed wading birds. The ditches and ponds will be impacted, but an enhanced flowway, lake littoral zone, and wetland preserve will be created along the western boundary to provide connectivity to adjoining preserve areas and provide enhanced and diverse habitats to compensate for any lost aquatic habitats. This project will compensate for lost species habitat by enhancing the condition of the preserved upland and wetland habitats, as well as creating marshland, indigenous upland buffer areas, transitional habitats, and open water areas. These improvements will provide more desirable wildlife habitat for wading birds and other aquatic or wetland dependent species than what currently exists. hl addition, any impacts not mitigated for on-site,will be mitigated through off-site compensation at a designated mitigation bank within an approved watershed service area. - 17 - Packet Page-3262- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave.,Fort Myers, FL 33901 mail to: P.O. Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994 Ph: (239)334 6766 Geza Wass de Czege, President Fax: (239)337 5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Na11. s, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 2011 Figure G.1: Listed Species Surveyed Transect Location Map Ss,. s $rs�.' ! Y' Sit S >• r ail:: T.. 3.4[ apt,'." e4 A. , 8'�,.v. 1"`s."° "� •. ` -. t .14;.,' t . r ' s t 7 r t. .-': `""."c ` i 3 ,t,,.„..,, � :. ,F f yea 7 4 , uq jjx +r. ; y ' .'. f fixt 5 Si. , ♦ a.,,,4['7 it.1 . ,i dY ...;s4 -'i �w f '3t r #gy {"'y1 -:-T t,fY a]'. S { ,��h , 1\ 3aF; t J [ eT' S 3 ` s ib rif °t{ ,,` 4,, P ° *-,' d y�g ��uu�'*7�� S Y yam- §"' , J ::„,....t /ES'J" a��.O`i "' ., a. , +' ;.Af ly *.' > ,s 'K 1 3 ca . 1 2 yA Yr. -- y trey:J h� -p'r v` { .,..T 7 ,E._ '_', - a ,� 1'F �tr 1 u , y � ♦ l' er 7 .,t�3�t�' r '��- �S 4-3 �.� ,.y.re x to y9 z 7,,,,T .,..v_ki..„ ,.a � F' -,` .41- •Y �; try s�S tp ,'4 { ? �...„. .,:_. 1 ,,1 t' � Ks4 rs � 11;:127:01' 4i°f2 P -' ', . mac. Y'' i ' ° :4.a u. yP.l. '1 c%.:'t F .,,r „� �``'F"3 3.t3 t�'�r .r Irk' .....:A-=`--`:, , �;' ■ s{, d� � .��'� �ly�, +)K J �S •G( !t ) J"�yy �wpafryly.� x•[�Y't { ^--. �' .{ .16. 'r 3 1, `M1' +,(�,` T S..'°,.3R h t `may rT_'- .'YE .'} ti 4 y r \.�'" a t aft �_kSYn�. + �S � h w, '3:.'• L'.v�4 ,.-�'� 1 1. +.q.: - ',�....ae£ .�.us u--1 ,, —�[h 4k-,-s`n°" �....,,,, ,- 1 fit :\\ ,� visa► -. dye 4-, °' , ' ? �> ..,�`�� `�t' +�S �,ta°"1L 3 A,1 �w b.- .'f.?v1�t .Its- �' r k tI. .k.. ...:5,. .. `fir ;..: ..._,..... "a .-irl.'.".R_.', _. .,i:. 'V'' S ...,_ .'l l� fi - 18 - Packet Page-3263- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640, Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18,T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples,Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 H. Special Treatment(ST)Overlay: See attached exhibit titled"FLUCCS Areas Within ST Zoning Area", which shows the ST area with the subject property's FLUCCS codes. As depicted on the exhibit,the ST area consists primarily of exotic invaded or previously altered cover types which do not meet the ecological, historical, or archeological conditions that would merit the status for special treatment. For those areas which meet the criteria, efforts were made to preserve and enhance these areas a much as possible and still make the site economically feasible for development. An amendment to the LDC is requested to adjust the boundaries of the ST overlay as depicted in the exhibit. The table below provides a summary of the habitats, included acreages and their percentage of the total ST overlay. Approximately 60.1%of the ST Overlay consists of exotic invaded or altered uplands and ditches, 21%consists of exotic invaded or altered wetlands, leaving only 18.9%of the ST Overlay with wetlands which meet the ST criteria. Table H.1: Special Treatment(ST) Overlay Habitats Assessment Total ST ST Code Wetland Habitat Description ST Acres Impact Preserved Percent 510J Drainage Ditches/Swales(SFWMD Juris.) 0.11 0.09 0.02 1.9% 6219 Exotic Invaded Cypress Forest(<50%) 1.39 0.40 0.99 24.3% 6249 Exotic Invaded Pine-Cypress Forest(<50%) 0.10 0.05 0.05 1.8% 6249/422 Pine-Cypress-Melaleuca w/Braz. p.(50-75%) 1.09 0.94 0.15 19.1% Total Jurisdiction Wetland Areas 2.69 1.48 1.21 47.1% Code OSW Habitat Description Total ST Acres Impact Preserved Percent 510 Drainage Ditches/Swales 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.8% Total OSW 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.8% Code Upland Habitat Description Total ST Acres Impact Preserved Percent 241/438 Abandoned Nursery Gone Wild (>75%) 0.94 0.94 0.00 16.4% 419/422 Pine-Cypress Forest w/Braz. Pepper(<50%) 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.3% 422 Brazilian Pepper Invaded Thicket(>75%) 0.45 0.45 0.00 7.9% 422/740 Brazilian Pepper Disturbed Site(>75%) 0.31 0.31 0.00 5.4% 424/740 Melaleuca Invaded Disturbed Site(>75%) 0.63 0.52 0.11 111% 426/424 Ear-leaf Acacia-Melaleuca Forest(>75%) 0.58 0.58 0.00 10.2% 4159 Exotic Invaded Pine Forest 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.8% Total Uplands 2.97 2.83 0.14 52.1% Total ST Uplands,Wetlands& OSW 5.71 4.31 1.40 100% - 19 - Packet Page-3264- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.O. Box 50640,Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd,Naples,Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 I. Historic & Archaeological Documentation: See attached letter(Figure 1.1) from the Florida Department of the State regarding historic or archaeological sites within the vicinity of the project site. The letter states that upon file review, no significant archaeological or historical resources are recorded within the project area. -Figure I.1: A S . v k*,.:\T -,-.1-1 :,,.,aa S S FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Kurt S.Browning Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES Mr.Geza Wass de Czege May 29,2009 Southern 13iomass,Inc. 1602 Woodford Avenue fort Myers,Florida 33901 Re: DHR No.:2009-2833 Received by DI]R:May 18,2009 Pine Ridge Road Partners,LLC. 13.65 Acre Tract-Proposed for Commercial Development Collier County Dear Mr.Wass de Czege: In accordance with the procedures contained in the Collier County's local requirements,we reviewed the referenced parcel for possible impact to cultural resources(any prehistoric or historic district,site,building,structure,or object)listed,or eligible for listing,in the National Register of Historic Places,or otherwise of historical,archaeological,or architectural value. Our review of the Florida Master Site File indicates that no significant archaeological or historical resources are recorded within the project area.Furthermore,because of the location and/or nature of the project it is unlikely that any such site will be affected. If there are any questions concerning our comments or recommendations,please contact Katherine Peterson,Historic Sites Specialist,by phone at(850)245-6333,or by electronic mail at kdneterson @dos.state.il.us.We appreciate your continued interest in protecting Florida's historic properties. Sincerely, Frederick P.Gaske,Director,and State Historic Preservation Officer 500 S.Itronough Street • 'Tallahassee,FL 32399.0250 • http://www'.flheritage.rom O Director's Office ❑Archaeological Research ®Historic Preservation (850)24 5-OM()•FA3):245-6436 (850)245-5444•FAX:315-453 (850)215.4333•5AX;215.6437 20 Packet Page -3265- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640,Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16,2011 Attachments - 21 - Packet Page-3266- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P.0.Box 50640,Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege,President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18,T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 Exhibit A Soils Map If r e «r x.�'�;' w r . :. .:--- rs- ota V Xy^ ti ;yi,?am'k i fi,* -..:,7 X ! : • a " , , € ft , e I t t�y ,,� i. 1'4 , .,▪ .'W y. '^ jurrf ar • � w t s riie' 1 r r.n #' , +N'? -W ms , a 'e 5, F � _:- ' i t,'s-. rr,'s. J a ,k ,-, -�3 \i D ' t l E r A J , k y x� t s �$H'4ar _Y ,%.:r 5 .. r r ate r {, ..1!. N y* r ':-."......4:-:;::'. d r a. F 44' Y r r r , r s, ., 1 i I ,, + C ..o.; y4 qr r iA. C111144 i -?:!..:...f.'',.,1,;,-',‘,.!:.k n 'f . .1 11 �� , L gy 'q A N{ Ld IND 1 � 3 .� ,` t � .' N t r ,- � �- fi ''j T . " 4T i - �� y 1 wgh -,,f t `: � � l d ' ^ � . '77'.---.:,. _ r f t �'1 'n '* I 13 i � 4t .s .��if4 T' f ' 1 ,i f iIrdl e J}� €,:r 4 a G °,' � §`S ' ' -� � �i " ',', i ;d. 4 x it a4- L h 4 � .,1,�. Aftf ! °, :: �i i j i -1,1. i 16 .1. ';; ' t 0,� te, ti " o 3k *A',.x [y: ii t}a Dwn rzD.wo i � l I $," S 3 t M[ " y19; p Y. f � ' �• 4 C � ' Cy '.1, a 3 X} 4' i.4 4 smar n, Qp . { 'x M 9 1 •. - J L Y ).r § �e r�l t p: s24,, 3s sr"# ukYr�+y,i.10 tO �i k .: 7'PI i'. fr. t -.p ° y,,n t: �° r�dr�"_xi i a r-a r- 1. , . l r , ° .:" r �� G}*� , .. F S„ ;[d�`45, fs " 1,` '! r a r�^ 'r , 1c j4 °” Y ` °rf_, J. r a Y'+,yY6�.! t . Y Y 41: r s _ .� x-'_ i [ W 41,, ' of ,1 t ,Y S rte-xE .r,[ i c r+� 4 }f. ...10.,01`. I ,. . I h�.. ," 4I• !I 1W ',, �s r• F#'rte(,r, ,, -,, �f j.� _. *, ---..,:`,114-v y e r i, ri t *; [--1',,;' q K ,i a t i ' ▪ r r r-}y x Y- alai .L4� � 9,Y G '. ig .,r,., i � .: t i�;-NSF 1�: P r Y,,� r iY d x nn ...r e .4 �f r• ' R C'r r i t ! y- i} 4[ rr /d.F }5 ..1 �'! $i ;V,C-TIc 'k�' F5 3 ems' i r , ,•gt. , I4 '�rF'rA h t s .} � ..2 i° a .. .K. A,.„T e r n#f'.g aar D` e.y._ „ w� "y '' i 1,.{ , 'i t i t C i0,i ; '� V ` %. 4,:i --- i � ,',,Ezr (� �ti�a --.4, ' i1 ,. -p ,y xi [r;.�� K �, .,� 1 r_4,„¢�'r' ;0�-�� ,,��0 kd h �' P � `C �A s,kr� ° 1-J�tclfi' �'�k •.H0 v cuxowa awo u _y, � ' ` ?` 'are 7 t , 'r .fit a -1r'ain ->` •9 LEy,pC.OW 'Y9$'J`4A..-i _ r.4 t� �z:6 b �� a ,pis a�4 y S+Nt��.t��•$ 1 l' 4.., +r i i 1 , o f e S !i { "4YS'x't�.t i a,Fz41 z£ r * � ,11.. `�2ttilla�r�� E - U 155 �`� s3'�Y�14rk- � }" Yl�:�tA`F 1 �,,. t 4 -.�T ! h 4.1`(C1rr"#fi ; f'zb �.j "3 7 "'��b C,3 SC"r`�j.K'tl4 �' .„-,4, _,. 1 x)r ,. . J- � kt"r;�' e1 t e a x. 1. t :M ... ,7 �: -a ..ht w i._3 d&1� a R @ t r�u 5+a ��y.n ! �y s r 4 ,y'�,*yc R - il} i-' gie Y ' ,` � 0" '�ttbrA j. 1 s 1 9 v JY . Si}.J � yr6 i3. 1 ,,A `F Y tt� t . ;{; ,}'17, .k ,-,;%t3 �Gr v:, O, -8 4,:'' a id, x..i` i?YD , 44,40, ;'-.V. '▪ _5 t f�L 't'tt ,_ -* _ • t nom' >w z -4,. " p� o f y-,�, i,i I * i fYy, ,1 . De Y\.:ice Y r , '.Y {'e'�°wsr r L'�t A � � '76iT'W,i[a ��•a��`0 A ..:L,7,.',; tt', -1!....,,,'''', '• -'1344t;',1.'110!:-'11.,,---',-',•,,':1 ,'?, A';',-=t-tii7N,,;7:,f1.1#11,1131i*e. ,:,,„... .,,,,.1,, ,J,•;. , '',!;;=.R.,,,s,qP,Y,A414,7,$a0,istIrg lit Soil Legend Code Description 2 Holopaw fine sand, limestone substratum, a hydric slough soil 3 Malabar fine sand, a hydric slough soil 16 Oldsmar fine sand, a hydric slough soil Soils: There are three soil types dominating the subject property, and all are designated hydric slough soils. These soil types typically show evidence of long periods of standing water above the ground surface during the rainy season, and the dominant indigenous vegetation found in these soil types are slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, laurel oak,wax myrtle, mully grass, and pineland threeawn. - 22 - Packet Page -3267- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P.0.Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 Exhibit B Estimated Mitigation Area Work Schedule 1. 02/16/12 Survey and stake preserve and buffer area boundary,and install silt fence. 2. 03/16/12 Install monitoring and panoramic photo stations markers. 3. 04/01/12 Conduct baseline monitoring survey for preserve area s 4. 04/16/12 Commence with exotic eradication and removal from preserve 5. 05/01/12 Submit baseline monitoring report to SFWMD and Collier County. 6. 05/16/12 Commence with wetland restoration site preparation activities 7. 06/16/12 Commence with wetland restoration area planting schedule 8. 07/16/12 Submit Time Zero monitoring survey report 9. 04/16/13 Commence with first annual exotic eradication activities 10. 10/16/13 Submit first annual monitoring survey report 11. 04/16/14 Commence with second annual exotic eradication activities 12. 10/16/14 Submit second annual monitoring survey report 13. 04/16/15 Commence with third annual exotic eradication activities 14. 10/16/15 Submit third annual monitoring survey report 15. 04/16/16 Commence with fourth annual exotic eradication activities 16. 10/16/16 Submit fourth annual monitoring survey report 17. 04/16/17 Commence with fifth annual exotic eradication activities 18. 10/16/17 Submit fifth and final annual monitoring survey report - 23 - Packet Page-3268- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640,Fort Myers, FL 33994 (239 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege,President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples,Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 Exhibit C Indigenous Areas Enhancement & Management Guidelines 1. Manually remove and eradicate all Class I exotic vegetation, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council, including but not limited to Brazilian pepper,ear-leaf acacia, Java plum, Chinese climbing fern, downy-rose myrtle, Australian pine,and melaleuca, and treat stumps with a recommended herbidde within 15 minutes after cutting. 2. Maintain a semi-annual exotic plant control the first year and an annual control thereafter, in perpetuity, to treat the exotic vegetation resprouting with a FDEP approved herbidde, and manually remove any seedlings. Conduct activities during the winter and spring dry season. 3. Annual maintenance will be conducted in perpetuity to ensure that the wetland and upland preserves and buffers are 100% free from Class I exotic vegetation (as currently defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council). 4. Provide the SFWMD and Collier County with an annual monitoring report for 5 consecutive years,with the first report submitted within 45 days following completed exotic eradication and restoration, including a qualitative narrative describing the vegetative changes and wildlife activities within the preserve area. Specifically, include the following: a. Provide six fixed point photo station' panoramic photograph analyses at the designated locations. b. provide quantitative data of planted species survival,their condition and natural recruitement. c. Exotic removal success data from the wetlands, including quantitative data,natural recruitment success,exotic invasion,general condition, and recommendations. 5. Exotic removal success criteria are as follows: a. The area is maintained,in perpetuity, in such a manner as to ensure that the preserve areas will be 100%free of exotic and nuisance plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council(including but not limited to melaleuca, Brazilian pepper,Australian pine,ear-leaf acacia,old world climbing fern,downy-rose myrtle,cattails, torpedograss,primrose willow, &caesarweed). b. All nuisance plant species(cattails,torpedo grass,primrose willow,caesarweed,etc.)are regularly maintained, and constitute no more than 2%of the total plant coverage. c. There is an 80%survival rate of the planted vegetation and at least 80%coverage of the planted area by indigenous native vegetation at the end of the third year of monitoring. d. There is a continual increase in indigenous plant species composition within the exotic removal areas throughout the five year monitoring period. 6. Signage shall be placed around the perimeter of the preserve to identify and protect the preserve during and after construction. The preserve signs shall be no closer than ten feet from adjacent property lines; be limited to a maximum height of four feet and a maximum size of two square feet. 7. Preserve Monitor: Geza Wass de Czege, Southern Biomes, Inc., 1602 Woodford Ave., Ft. Myers, FL 33901, (239) 334-6766 Owner/Trustee: Mr. Philip J. Fischler, First Community Bank of Southwest Florida 1565 Red Cedar Drive, Fort Myers, FL 33907, (239) 895-1060 NOTE:The preserve manager is retained under annual contract. The owner/developer will be responsible for informing the County of any changes regarding the preserve manager and owner/developer contacts. - 24 - Packet Page -3269- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16,2011 Exhibit D Detailed Enhancement, Restoration & Maintenance Guidelines D.1: 2.71 Acres of Upland & Wetland Enhancement Areas Maintenance Guidelines: 1. Manually cut, remove, or eradicate all exotic vegetation (as currently defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council), including but not limited to Brazilian pepper, ear-leaf acacia, Chinese climbing fern, downy-rose myrtle, and melaleuca, and treat stumps with a recommended herbicide within 15 minutes after cutting. 2. All exotic vegetation within the 75 ft. of the preserve fringe will be manually removed from the preserve and disposed off site. Exotics beyond 75 ft. from the fringe and large exotic trees, which could damage native species (i.e.: slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, wax myrtle, swamp bay, dahoon holly) during removal from the preserve, may be herbicide injected, and left standing, with prior approval from District compliance staff. 3. Eradicate any cattails, torpedograss, and primrose willow with an approved systemic herbicide, and establish an annual eradication program to maintain the nuisance species at 100% free of exotics immediately following treatment. 4. Maintain a semi-annual exotic plant control the first year, and an annual control thereafter, in perpetuity, to treat the exotic vegetation (as currently defined by the fow Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council) resprouting with an approved herbicide, and manually remove any seedlings. Conduct activities during the winter and spring dry season. 5. Provide the SFWMD & Collier County with an annual monitoring report, for 5 years, including a qualitative narrative describing the vegetative changes and wildlife activities within the preserve/indigenous areas. Include the following: a. Provide six fixed point photo station' panoramic photograph analyses as depicted on the management plan. b. Narrative report of exotics re-invasion, and removal/eradication success. c. Vegetation recruitment success data from each preserve/indigenous area, including quantitative data, natural recruitment success, exotic invasion, general condition, and recommendations. d. Narrative report of typical and unique wildlife utilization. 7. Enhancement success criteria are as follows: a. The area is maintained 100%free of exotic plants (as identified in the current Florida Exotic Pest Plant Coundl publication, such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, &Australian pine, etc.) following each exotic removal program. b. There is a continual increase in indigenous species composition within the exotic removal areas throughout the five year monitoring period, and those areas which were void of vegetation due to exotic plant infestation, have at least an 80% indigenous plant coverage by the end of the five years. - 25 - Packet Page-3270- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege,President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 D.2: 0.26 Acres of Cypress Marsh Wetland &0.11 acre Lake Littoral Areas Restoration/ Planting Guidelines: 1. Coordination with WMD compliance staff will occur prior to any mechanical removal, or prior to leaving large stands of exotics treated in place and not removed from the preserve. 2. Maintain siltation and erosion control barriers between the viable wetlands and those areas within the restoration areas which will have mechanical clearing or will be excavated as part of the flowways or wading bird pools. 3. Manually or mechanically remove all exotic vegetation, including but not limited to Brazilian pepper, ear- leaf acacia, melaleuca,torpedograss and downy-rose myrtle, in such a manor that any viable indigenous vegetation is preserves. 4. The portion of the restoration area and all of the creation areas void of substantial indigenous vegetation, will be scraped down 6-8 inches and topsoil stockpiles. Then excavate the area 6-8 inches below the specified elevations on the grading plan,and redistribute the top soil that was stockpiled. Grade to specified elevation per plan design,to establish an irregular grade ranging from +1.0 to-3.5 feet below maintained water elevation. The average grade should be-1.0 feet,with occasional depressions at-3.5 feet, having side slopes at 4:1 grade or less. 5. All areas of the marsh restoration areas will be revegetated with indigenous wetland vegetation such as listed on the Marsh Restoration& Lake Littoral Area Plant List attached to this report. Densities are determined for trees planted on 10'centers 70 trees), shrubs on 8'centers (110 shrubs)and herbaceous plants on 3' centers (1,600 herbaceous plants),with no more than 50% canopy and midstory vegetation, and 80% areal coverage of groundcover vegetation. 6. All lake littoral areas will be revegetated with indigenous wetland vegetation such as listed on the Marsh Restoration& Lake Littoral Area Plant List attached to this report. Densities are determined for trees planted on 10'centers 24 trees), shrubs on 8'centers (75 shrubs) and herbaceous plants on 3'centers (530 herbaceous plants),with no more than 50%canopy and midstory vegetation, and 100% areal coverage of groundcover vegetation. 7. Maintain a semi-annual exotic control the first year, and an annual control thereafter, in perpetuity,to treat any exotic plant resprouting with an approved herbicide, and manually remove any exotic seedlings. Conduct activities during the winter and spring dry season. 8. Within 45 days following completion of the mitigation activities conduct a Time-Zero monitoring report with photo station panoramic photos, number and types of plants installed, and a location map of photo stations and transect lines. 9. Provide the SFWMD and Collier County with an annual monitoring report,for 5 years,with a semi-annual survey the first year, and an annual survey thereafter. The reports shall include a quantitative and qualitative narrative describing the vegetative changes and wildlife activities within the mitigation areas. Including the following: a. Provide fixed point photo station'panoramic photograph analyses at the terminus of the transect lines as designated on the Mitigation Design Plan. b. Narrative report of exotics re-invasion, and removal success. c. Revegetation success data from the transect surveys as shown on the Design Plan, including quantitative and quantitative data of plants, natural recruitment, exotic invasion,general condition, and recommendations. d. Narrative report of typical and unique wildlife utilization. - 26 - Packet Page-3271- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.O. Box 50640, Fort Myers, FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege,President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract,Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples,Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 D.2: 0.26 Acres of Cypress Marsh Wetland &0.11 Ac. Littoral Restoration Guidelines: (cont.) 10. Restoration Areas success criteria are as follows: a. The area is maintained 100%free of exotic plants (as identified in the current Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council publication, such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, &Australian pine, etc.)following each exotic removal program. b. There is a continual increase in indigenous wetland species composition within the revegetated areas throughout the five year monitoring period, and those areas which were void of vegetation, have at least an 80% indigenous plant coverage by the end of the five years. c. Water elevations are maintained at the control elevation, or at a reasonable level to help maintain an adequate hydroperiod which allows the recruitment of indigenous wetland plant species to dominate. d. Survival of planted species exceed 80%, and there is a continual increase in wetland species composition throughout the five year monitoring period, so that at least 80% of the revegetated areas are covered with appropriate wetland vegetation, as defined in Chapter 17-340.450, F.A.C. Cypress Marsh Restoration & Lake Littoral Areas Plant List TREES: (Min. 6'tall &in 7 gal., Clustered 10'o.c.) 0.26 ac. Marsh 0.11 ac. Lake Lit. 1. 25- Taxodium spp. Cypress OBL 25 16 2. 20-Annona glabra pond apple OBL 20 4 3. 5 -Acer rubrum Red maple FACW 5 0 4. 15- Fraxinus caroliniana, Popash OBL 15 4 .' 5. 5- Ilex cassine Dahoon holly OBL 5 0 TOTAL TREES 70 24 SHRUBS: (Min. 3'tall & in 3 gal., Clustered 8'o.c.) 1. 60- Cephalanthus occidentalis buttonbush OBL 60 35 2. 30- Myrica cerifera wax myrtle FAC 30 15 3. 10- Cornus foemina dogwood,swamp FACW 10 15 4. 10- /tea virginica virginia willow OBL 10 10 5. 10- Myrsine guianensis, Myrsine FAC 10 0 TOTAL SHRUBS 110 75 HERBACEOUS GROUNDCOVER: (Min. '16"tall, 1 gal. or BR equiv., 3' o.c.) 1. 400-Panicum hemitomon maidencane OBL 400 100 2. 250-Eleocharis spp. spikerush OBL 250 100 3. 250-Pontederia cordata pickerelweed OBL 250 100 4. 150-Bacopa spp.water-hyssop OBL 150 50 5. 150- Canna spp. canna OBL 150 50 6. 100- Sagittaria spp. arrowhead OBL 100 50 7. 100- Scirpus spp. bulrush OBL 100 50 8. 100- Spartina bakeri cordgrass,sand FACW 100 0 9. 100- Thalia geniculata thalia;fire flag OBL 100 30 TOTAL GROUNDCOVER PLANTS 1600 530 - 27 - Packet Page -3272- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers, FL 33901 - mail to: P.0. Box 50640, Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege,President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 D.3: 0.91 Acres Indigenous Upland Buffer Creation Guidelines: 1. Maintain necessary siltation and erosion control barriers between the preserve and buffer areas which will have mechanical clearing and will be filled and graded as part of the water management perimeter berm/wetland buffer habitat. 2. Once the berms have been created per construction plan, using appropriate fill material or topsoil suitable for plant growth (no limerock, crushed limerock, or marl base materials), and graded to specification, the buffer areas will be vegetated with 3' wide Bahia sod TOB, and indigenous upland and transitional wetland vegetation along the side slopes, such as listed on the Buffer Areas Restoration Plant Selection List attached to this report. Densities are determined for trees planted on 10' centers (390 trees), shrubs on 8' centers (620 shrubs) and herbaceous plants on 3' centers (4,400 herbaceous plants). 3. Maintain a semi-annual exotic control the first year, and an annual control thereafter, in perpetuity, to treat any exotic plant resprouting with an approved herbicide, and manually remove any exotic seedlings. Conduct activities during the winter and spring dry season. 4. Within 45 days following completion of the mitigation activities conduct a Time-Zero monitoring report with photo station panoramic photos, number and types of plants installed, and a location map of photo stations and transect lines. 5. Provide the WMD and County with an annual monitoring report, for 5 years, with a semi-annual survey the first year, and an annual survey thereafter. The reports shall include a quantitative and qualitative narrative describing the vegetative changes and wildlife activities within the mitigation areas. Including the following: a. Provide fixed point photo station' panoramic photograph analyses at a terminus of the designated transect lines as depicted on the Mitigation Design Plan. b. Narrative report of exotics re-invasion, and removal success. c. Revegetation success data from transect surveys as shown on the Design Plan, including quantitative and quantitative data, of plant survival, natural recruitment, exotic invasion, general condition,and recommendations. d. Narrative report of typical and unique wildlife utilization. 6. Restoration Areas success criteria are as follows: a. The area is maintained 100%free of exotic plants (as identified in the current Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council publication, such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, &Australian pine, etc.) following each exotic removal program. b. There is a continual increase in indigenous wetland species composition within the revegetated areas throughout the five year monitoring period, and those areas which were void of vegetation, have at least an 80%indigenous plant coverage by the end of the five years. c. Water elevations are maintained atthe control elevation, or at a reasonable level to help maintain an adequate hydroperiod which allows the recruitment of indigenous wetland plant species to dominate. - 28 - Packet Page-3273- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P.O. Box 50640, Fort Myers,FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16,2011 d. Survival of planted species exceed 80%, and there is a continual increase in wetland species composition throughout the five year monitoring period, so that at least 80% of the revegetated areas are covered with appropriate wetland vegetation, as defined in Chapter 17-340.450, F.A.C. Buffer Areas Upland Forest Plant List 390 TREES (min 8'tall, in 7 gal cont.) 1. 150 Pinus elliottii, Slash pine FAC 2. 50 Taxodium spp. Cypress OBL 3. 50 Acer rubrum Red maple 4. 50 Ilex cassine Dahoon holly 5. 35 Persea barbona, Red bay 6. 35 Quercus virginiana, Live Oak 7. 20 Quercus laurafolia Laural oak 620 SHRUBS (min. 3'tall, in 3 gal. cont.) 1. 50 Callicarpa Americana, Beautyberry 2. 50 Cephalanthus occidentalis buttonbush 3. 40 Chtysobalanus icaco Coco plum 4. 50 Corpus foemina Swamp dogwood 5. 200 Myrica cerifera wax myrtle 6. 50 Myrsine guianensis, Myrsine 7. 180 Serenoa repens saw palmetto 4,400 HERBACEOUS GROUNDCOVER (16"tall, in 1 gal. or equivlant) 1. 1,000 Amphicarpum muhlen., Blue Maidencane 2. 1,000 Paspalum vaginiturn, Seashore paspalum 3. 600 Muhlenbergia capillaris muhly grass 4. 500 Aristida stricta thalia;Wiregrass 5. 500 Spartina bakeri, sand cordgrass 6. 300 Blechnum serrulatum, swamp fern 3,100 Sq. Ft. SOD GROUNDCOVER (3'wide TOB Bahia grass sod)10 7. Paspalum notatum, Bahia grass 10 At the top of bank(TOB)of the water management berms,a three(3) feet wide sodded strip is proposed to help stabilize the berms located within the preserves and between the retention lake and preserves. This also provides an access path for maintenance. It does not include the top of side slopes adjacent to the development,which will be fenced .•,: and planted with indigenous species such as sand cordgrass,muhly grass,wax myrtle,saw palmetto,and coco plum - 29 - Packet Page -3274- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Southern Biomes, Inc. 1602 Woodford Ave., Fort Myers,FL 33901 - mail to: P. 0. Box 50640,Fort Myers, FL 33994 Ph: (239)334-6766 - Geza Wass de Czege, President - Fax: (239)337-5028 EAS Report for 3480 Pine Ridge Road 13.65 acre Tract, Sec. 18, T49S, R26E, Pine Ridge Rd, Naples, Collier County, FL Revised: Nov. 16, 2011 Exhibit E Pre-Construction and Construction Environmental Guidelines: 1. Notify the District prior to commencement of any construction activities. 2. Survey development boundary and Install silt fence as specified on the construction plan, between the preserves and development footprint. 3. Prior to any type of exotic eradication or clearing activities within the preserve, conduct a baseline monitoring survey, and within 30 days submit report to the District. 4. Coordinate activities with District compliance staff prior to any mechanical removal of exotics, or prior to leaving large stands of exotics, that are to be treated in place and not removed from the preserve. 5. Manually or mechanically remove all exotic and nuisance plant species as specified for enhancement or restoration areas, and approved by District staff. 6. Prior to filling existing ponds, survey for possibility of turtle or other wildlife, and if observed, relocate out of harm's way any observed during the survey, or during construction as pond is being filled, allow wildlife to move out of harm's way. 7. Maintain all required siltation and erosion control barriers in functional condition between the preserve and buffer areas during the entire construction period. 8. Minimize the use of hay bales for erosion control. But if used, they are to be removed from within, or along the edge of, the preserve once construction has been completed. 9. To stabilize surface water management system berms extending through preserves will be planted with a 3' wide top of berm sodded walkway, with indigenous vegetation planted along the side slopes; such as Paspalum Vaginitum, Spartina bakeri, Amphicarpurn muhlenbergianurn, Muhlenbergia capillaries, Aristida spp., etc. - 30 - Packet Page -3275- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Arnk Packet Page-3276- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. * 4 -6' PUDZ-PL20110000406 REV: 1 BRYNWOOD CENTER .4/ DATE: 7/22!11 DUE: 8/19/11 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Kurt S.Browning Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES Mr. Geza Wass de Czege May 29, 2009 Southern Biomass,Inc, 1602 Woodford Avenue Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Re: DI R No.: 2009-2833 Received by DER:May 18, 2009 . .. . -- .. — — . - -- Pine Midge Road Partners,LLC-- 13.65 Acre Tract-Proposed for Commercial Development Collier County Dear Mr.Wass de Czege: In accordance with the procedures contained in the Collier County's local requirements, we reviewed the referenced parcel for possible impact to cultural resources (any prehistoric or historic district, site,building, structure, or object) listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places, or otherwise of historical,archaeological, or architectural value. Our review of the Florida Master Site File indicates that no significant archaeological or historical resources are recorded within the project area.Furthermore,because of the location and/or nature of the project it is unlikely that any such site will be affected. If there are any questions concerning our comments or recommendations,please contact Katherine Peterson,Historic Sites Specialist,by phone at(850)245-6333, or by electronic mail at kdpeterson @dos.state.fl.us. We appreciate your continued interest in protecting Florida's historic properties. Sincerely, • Frederick P. Gaske,Director, and State Historic Preservation Officer • 500 S.Bronough Street • Tallahassee,FL 32399-0250 • http://www•flLeritage.com ❑Director's Office Q Archaeological rtesearch ©Historic Preservation (850)245-6300•FAX:245-6436 (850)245-6444•FAX 245-6452 (85D)245-6335•FAX 245-6437 Packet Page-3277- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Packet Page-3278- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. PUDZ-P1 BRYNWOOD CENTER MPUD DATE: 1 2/5/1 1 DUE: 1/4/12 EVALUATION CRITERIA BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.B) 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic access, drainage, sewer,water and other utilities. The proposed CPUD zoning is suitable for the type and pattern of development along with its retail, office hotel/motel, and group housing. The subject 13.65± acres proposed for rezoning is adjacent to the Baldridge PUD (Marquesa Plaza) located to the west of the subject property. (See attached Baldridge PUD document). Lands located to the east are zoned PUD for the Pine Ridge Center West PUD which is partially developed for commercial uses. Retail uses including motels are also allowed in the Pine Ridge Center West PUD amongst a broad range of commercial uses. (See attached Pine Ridge Center PUD document). Commercial uses are generally developed continuously on the south side of Pine Ridge Road from I-75 to Livingston Road. A similar pattern of commercial uses prevails on the north side of Pine Ridge Road albeit with several vacant properties. (See aerial photo). The subject property is suitable for a CPUD based on the emerging pattern of nonresidential development in the Pine Ridge corridor at this location. The subject property also has readily available access to sewer,water, drainage and other utilities. Direct access will be provided from Pine Ridge Road (right in right out) with interconnection to both adjoining commercial developments. The results of the TIS indicate the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect nearby and surrounding roadways to further establish compliance with this criterion. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. The proposed CPUD is under unified control for the purpose of this rezoning request. Arrangements will be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such facilities (that are not provided or maintained at public expense) through an association. H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\1stResub7 Packet Page-3279-ation Criteria 11-30-2011.doc 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) The following analysis.demonstrates how the proposed rezoning request complies with the Growth Management Plan beginning with compliance with the criteria in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) pertaining to the Office and In-fill Commercial Subdistrict. I. Office and In-fill Subdistrict. The applicant is requesting compliance with the Office and In-fill District of the Future Land Use Element. This CPUD meets all applicable provisions of this Sub- district that essentially allows the proposed development, if bounded on two sides by commercial zoning, may include those of the highest intensity abutting the Commercial District, notwithstanding a proposed GMP Amendment discussed below. Both the Pine Ridge West Center PUD located to the east and the Baldridge PUD located to the West include a broad range of uses generally representative of the C-1 through C-4 Districts. The depth of the proposed zoning district that fronts on Pine Ridge Road is the same as the commercial zoning districts abutting the property. It is important to note that the Commercial and Office In-fill Subdistrict presently includes a provision that properties zoned commercial pursuant to any of the In-Fill Subdistricts in the Urban Mixed Use Area or in the Urban Commercial Subdistrict shall not qualify to cause the abutting property to become eligible for comparable commercial zoning. • Staff has initiated an amendment to the Future Land Use Element to eliminate this provision. This will, in effect, allow the proposed CPUD to be eligible for the higher intensity uses since it now abuts commercial zoning on both sides under the revised criteria. The amendment is expected to go before the Board of County Commissioners for final adoption this fall. We are requesting that this petition be reviewed as if the amendment is adopted. No hearings will be scheduled until the amendment is adopted before the Board of County Commissioners. The Commercial and Office In-fill Subdistricts allow for rezoning up to 12 acres in size. For any commercial development in excess of 12 acres, the property should be limited to a conservation easement or open space. The proposed 13.65± property includes 3.1 acres of preserve area or 10.35± acres of developable area to demonstrate compliance with this criteria. II. Compliance with Additional GMP Provisions. Packet Page-3280- H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\I st Resubmitta] _ _ ._ _.____ _.__.. ..Criteria 11-30-2011.doc 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. The proposed development is an infill development located within the Urban Area. Policy 5.3 of the FLUE discourages unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of facilities and further encourages confining urban intensity development to areas designated urban on the Future Land Use map. The proposed CPUD, therefore, can be found consistent with this FLUE policy. Policy 5.4 of the FLUE requires that new developments shall be compatible with and complimentary to surrounding land uses, subject to meeting the compatibility criteria of the LDC. The subject rezoning can be found compatible with surrounding uses and the existing pattern of development based on the proposed uses and the development standards contained in this application. Furthermore,there is a transition in land uses from the north to the south on the subject property with lower intensity • land uses located on the southern portion of the property adjacent to residential land uses in the Brynwood PUD, a single family residential development. • (XIII) Objective 7 — In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Policy 7.1 The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The proposed CPUD will have direct access to Pine Ridge Road, an arterial roadway. Policy 7.2 The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The proposed CPUD will connect to the commercial developments to the east and west providing alternate access to Livingston Road and Pine Ridge Road without requiring additional traffic signals. Policy 7.3 All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The proposed CPUD connects to the commercially zoned properties to the east and west. 3 H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\1st Resubmi Packet Page-3281-ion Criteria 11-30-2011.doc 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Policy 7.4 The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The proposed CPUD includes preserve areas that provide for common open space areas. Pedestrian access within and between development areas will provide for a walkable community. The proposed CPUD is a commercial development not a residential development although a CCRC is a proposed use to broaden the mix of land uses. (X0 Policy 7.5 The County shall encourage mixed-use development within the same buildings by allowing residential dwelling units over and/or abutting commercial development. This policy shall be implemented through provisions in specific subdistricts in this Growth Management Plan. The proposed CPUD does not propose mixing conventional residential dwelling with retail uses within the same building. Policy 7.6 The County shall explore the creation of an urban "greenway" network along existing major canal banks and powerline easements. This policy is not applicable since no greenway corridor exists in this area. Policy 7.7 The Community Development and Environmental Services Division will continue to research smart growth practices in an effort to improve the future of Collier County by specifically addressing land use and transportation planning techniques for inclusion in future land development regulations. This policy is not applicable. Policy 1.3 of the economic element of the growth management notes that Collier County will support a health care system that addresses the needs of both business and the work force. The proposed uses include a CCRC to meet continuing care needs of Collier County's residents; therefore, compliance with Policy 1.3 of the economic element can be met and health care uses are also permitted in Exhibit A. Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element notes that all rezoning applications shall consider the impacts on the overall system and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway segment already operating and/or H:12006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\1st Resubmitta Packet Page -3282-1 Criteria 11-30-2011.doc 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. projected to operate at an unacceptable level of service within the five year planning period,unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved. The TIS indicates that the proposed CPUD will not lower the level of service to an unacceptable level. Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. As previously noted, the proposed CPUD will provide for shared access to the east and west. Conclusion Based on the foregoing the proposed CPUD rezoning request can be found consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the FLUE, the economic element of the GMP and the Transportation Element of the GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed CPUD Master Plan provides a variety of uses in two, three and four story structures (see proposed CPUD Master Plan and Exhibit B, Development Standards). It also provides a transition to less intensive land uses in the southern portion of the property adjacent to residential development. A minimum setback of 60 feet shall be maintained along the south property line. (See also Exhibit B, Development Standards.) 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed rezoning request as can be seen from the CPUD Master Plan meets or exceeds the minimum amount of required open space to serve the proposed development which is thirty percent (30%) and is shown on the CPUD Master Plan. Therefore, compliance with this criterion is established. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities,both public and private. Based on the T.I.S. submitted in this application, transportation facilities are adequate to support the needs of the proposed development. No other public or private improvements are required for development to commence other than on-site improvements. 5 H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\1st Resubm Packet Page -3283-Eon Criteria 11-30-2011.doc 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The proposed infill development for this CPUD is located in an area that can readily accommodate the plamied development to the built-out condition. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed CCRC is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Collier County planned unit development regulations and those of the Collier County Land Development Code with the exception of the minor deviations which are compatible and lend themselves to the type of development and land uses that are proposed. H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\lst Resubmitt Packet Page-3284-at Criteria 11-30-2011.doc RYNWL20 B OO 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. RYNW DATE: 12/5/11 DUE: 1/4/12 REZONING CRITERIA COMPLIANT WITH LDC SECTION 10.03.05 I. BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD 10.03.05 I. Nature of requirements of planning commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in 10.02.12 D. shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following,when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the growth management plan. See PUD Rezoning Considerations Criteria No. 3. The proposed change is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 2. The existing land use pattern. The subject property is bounded by commercial zoning on the east and west sides of the property and residential development to the south. (See cover letter and PUD Rezoning Consideration Criteria No. 3). The subject property is one of the few remaining properties between 1-75 and Livingston Road on the south side of Pine Ridge Road proposed for commercial development. The PUD zoning to the east is the Pine Ridge Center West PUD. Lands to the west are zoned for the Baldridge PUD. Both allow for a broad range of commercial uses. (See attached PUD documents for these PUDs). The existing land use pattern supports commercial use for this CPUD at this location to satisfy this criterion. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed rezoning request is an infill development and will not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts as commercial use is the predominate development pattern west of I-75 and east of Livingston Road. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing zoning district boundaries are logically drawn(see response to no. 2 above). 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The subject property is zoned for agriculture use that is no longer a viable use for the subject property based on the emerging commercial development pattern at this location. These • include the commercial uses on both sides of Pine Ridge Road between I-75 and Livingston Road making this commercial corridor viable for commercial uses at this location. Based on this changed condition the proposed CPUD is an appropriate use at this location. 1 H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\1st Resubmittal\Brynwood Center Rezoning Criteria 11-30-2011.doc Packet Page-3285- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. With the proposed development standards and limitations on uses and commercial development located on both sides of the subject property it is not anticipated that living conditions will be adversely affected in the neighborhood. Special considerations are incorporated into Exhibit B, the Development Standards to protect residential uses to the south including limitations on building height a 60-foot setback from the southern property line that includes a preserve buffer area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. Based on the TIS submitted with this zoning application, it is not anticipated that the proposed request will adversely affect traffic congestion or otherwise affect public safety. Interconnections with adjacent commercial developments will allow flexibility and convenience for access and improve traffic circulation. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The onsite system of lakes is not anticipated to create a drainage problem and will meet all pertinent requirements of the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. With the limitations on use and building height, the proposed CPUD will not seriously reduce light or air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. With the limitations on uses and proposed development standards, the proposed change in use for the CPUD should not adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. As previously noted, the subject property is adjacent to commercial uses to the east and west. The residential area to the south will be separated by a preserve area in the proposed CPUD. • In addition, a preserve area contained in the Brynwood PUD along the western edge of the development will further enhance compatibility as noted. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed change in use will not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations for the reasons noted. 2 H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\1st Resubmitta1\R*- , 'r M r P' 'RP>^,,;"Criteria 11-30-2011.doc Packet Page-3286- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change in use will not constitute a grant of special privilege as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed use is consistent with the Growth Management Plan and is appropriate based on the emerging commercial land use pattern in the general area. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The agriculture zoning use is no longer appropriate at this location. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed CPUD is not out of scale or character with the needs of the neighborhood or county. Uses are transitional in character from the north to the south of the subject property along with a reduction in building height in recognition of residential uses south of the subject property. • 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other sites in the urban area for commercial use, but for the previous reasons noted commercial use is appropriate at this location. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The physical characteristics of the subject property along with the proposed preserve areas set aside lend themselves well to the proposed commercial use of the property and the range of commercial uses proposed. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County growth management plan and as defined and.implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. Sewer,water,transportation services and other support services are adequate to support the proposed development. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. 3 H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\1st Resubmittal\Brvnwood Center Rezoning Criteria 11-30-2011.doc Packet Page -3287- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. The applicant will consider any such factors or standards determined by the BCC deemed important in the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. • poot 4 H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone2011\1stResubmitt " •— - — ;Criteria 11-30-2011.doc Packet Page-3288- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. JUSTIFICATIONS FOR DEVIATIONS PROPOSED IN THE BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD REVISED 4/9/2012 Deviation No. 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1, to increase the floor area ratio (F.A.R.) from 0.45 to 0.60 for group housing/continuing care retirement community. The justification for this deviation has been supported by the CCPC and BCC with accommodations for a broader range amenities required by continuing care retirement communities to reduce the amount of offsite travel. Deviation No. 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.1, Sidewalks and Bike Paths requirements that requires sidewalks on both sides of the street. The deviation is to not require sidewalks on either side of the street if a sidewalk network is provided which continuously connects all development tracts to each other, to Pine Ridge Road, and to the east and west neighboring tracts. The justification for this deviation is that pedestrian pathways and sidewalks will connect all development tracts just as they would along the interconnecting roadway. The proposed pedestrian access will allow access closer to building and parking areas and will have dedicated crosswalks at roadway crossings. It will also connect to the neighboring east and west developments. Largely for safety reasons, and since the internal main roadway will carry traffic from this property and adjoining development, it is preferable to maintain separation between pedestrians and the traffic. Deviation No. 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.H, Fences and Walls that requires when nonresidential development lies contiguous to or opposite a residentially zoned district, said nonresidential development shall provide a masonry wall or prefabricated concrete wall or fence. The deviation is not to require a wall or fence along the south property line where a lake or the southwest preserve area lies between the commercial developed area and the south property line. The justification for this deviation is that a lake and the southwest preserve in combination with north buffer of the neighboring Brynwood Preserve will provide ample screening and buffering between this project's development areas and neighboring residential development. The developed site in the southeast corner will provide an enhanced Type B landscape buffer, wall and natural preserve. Deviation No. 4 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.0 which requires a 60-foot right-of-way width for local streets.The deviation is to allow for a 40-foot wide private roadway easement or right-of- way. (See cross section on Exhibit C-1 CPUD Master Plan). The justification for this deviation is that the proposed cross section is adequate to meet the ingress and egress needs and drainage and utilities requirements of the proposed CPUD. Deviation No. 5A seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.9.a, pertaining to setbacks for on premises directional signs which requires directional signs to maintain a setback 10 feet from the edge of the roadway, paved surface or the back of the curb. This deviation would allow the H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\2nd Resubmittal\Revised Justifications for Proposed Deviations 4-9-2012.docx Packet Page-3289- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. directional signs to be located 5 feet from the edge of roadway pavement as depicted on the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibit C). The justification for this deviation of reducing this setback is that these signs are a convenience to the motoring public by placing the directional signs closer to the roadway to enhance their visibility. This will not contravene the public, health, safety and welfare. The controlled speed at the entrances will further insure this. Deviation No. 5B seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06,04.F.1.b which requires pole and ground signs to be setback 10 feet from property line. This deviation is to allow the directional signs to be set back 3 feet from the property line to the east and west interconnecting access road entrances as depicted on the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibit C). The justification for this deviation is that these signs will have more convenient visual exposure to motorists as they enter the development to their intended destination. Deviation No. 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.9.b, which allows on-premises directional signs to be combined into a single sign 64 square feet in area. This deviation is to allow two directional signs, each up to 64 square feet in area at the east and west interconnecting access road entrances as depicted on the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibit C). The justification for this deviation is that directional visibility can be provided at each entrance of the east and west connector roads to better direct ingressing vehicles to their intended Atow destination from the two points of interconnection. Deviation No. 7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.3, pertaining to directory signs which allows multiple-occupancy parcels or multiple parcels developed under a unified development plan with a minimum of 8 independent units and containing 25,000 square feet of leasable floor area to be permitted on a directory sign and which allows a minimum of 4 panels and a maximum of 8 panels. This deviation is to allow a minimum of 2 independent panels to be displayed on the directory sign at the project entrance on Pine Ridge Road as depicted on the CPUD Master Plan (Exhibit C). Four or more independent tenants/users shall be permitted to have a 150 SF directory sign per LDC Section 5.06.04.F.3.C. Two or three independent tenants/users shall have a maximum 100 SF directory sign. The justification for this deviation is that there may be as few as two tenants/users including one on Pine Ridge Road. Any tenants/users behind this will have no exposure to Pine Ridge Road and motorists would have no way of recognizing the existence of another establishment without the aid of signage on Pine Ridge Road. Allowing a minimum of two tenants/users to be displayed on the directory sign is a convenience to the motoring public so they will be able to clearly identify all establishments from Pine Ridge Road. Furthermore, if an office building was developed to the south of the Pine Ridge Road frontage it could have multiple tenants. For example, an office building could have medical uses and clinics, banks, real estate offices that also may wish to be located on the directory sign depending on the composition of end users in the PUD for the convenience of the motoring public. Atetok H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\2nd Resubmittal\Revised Justifications for Proposed Deviations 4-9-2012.docx Packet Page-3290- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. The reason for limiting the size of the directory sign to 100 SF for two or three tenants/users is to reduce the size of the sign in recognition that it justifies the need for less sign area. However, four or more tenants/users shall be permitted to have a 150 SF directory sign (as allowed by LDC) as a convenience to the motoring public so the sign is readily visible from Pine Ridge Road and not dissimilar to the size of other signs on this roadway. • • • H:12006120060631WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\2nd Resubmittal\Revised Justifications for Proposed Deviations 4-9-2012.docx Packet Page-3291- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. I-Cl VI HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS •PLANNERS •SURVEYORS 4111kg LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 950 Encore Way• Naples,Florida 34110•Phone:239.254.2000•Fax:239.254.2099 . January 13, 2012 Re: Brynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 HM File No.: 206.063 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Robert L. Duane, AICP, of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard Yovanovich, Esquire, of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., on behalf of the property owner, has made a formal application to Collier County to rezone 13.65± acres located on the south side of Pine Ridge Road approximately one-quarter of a mile east of Livingston Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida to be consistent with Collier County's Growth Management Plan and surrounding/adjoining property uses. The current zoning of the property is "A" Agriculture with a Special Treatment Overlay (ST). The proposed rezone is for a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) and to allow a maximum of 145,000 square feet of commercial development consisting of 120,000± square feet of office and medical uses and 25,000± square feet of retail use. Permitted uses may also include group care facilities (assisted living units) at a floor area ratio of 0.60 up to 26 units per acre. Also permitted are hotel and motel use, at 26 units per acre. For each acre of group care or hotel or motel use, 10,626 square feet of retail or office use shall be subtracted from the total amount of allowable commercial square footage. Also proposed is preservation of 3.10± acres of native wetlands, uplands and buffers. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Monday, January 30, 2012 at 5:30p.m. at the Hawthorne Suites, Cypress Room, 3557 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34109. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES,INC. j . I/ Robert L. Duane, AICP Planning Director RLD/sek milk H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 201 I\N1M\Propertv Owner Letter 1-13-2012.docx Packet Page-3292- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. AFFMAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, as amended, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date,time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. (Signature of Applicant) ROBERT L. DUANE (Printed name of Applicant) State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 27th day of January , 2012 by ROBERT L. DUANE, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. (Signature of Notary Public) (Notary Seal) S I\c-v1 1 ttf0l Printed Name of Notary "' STEPHANIE KAROL • * MY COMMISSION#DD 755816 ` EXPIRES:March 9,2012 , '.• c dC` Bonded ihru Notary PubAcUndenvfiers H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\NIM\Affido Packet Page-3293-0-2012.doc . . • ---- ' — 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Am, - . . . _ -...-:,-:-. --,,..-:-,: f,''':.::r.:::• .:'Y-:•i!';'`•'::-',:.-T;:71-'NE.1GHBORHOOD. '.....' •-.'"--. .''''''',' - NAPLES DAILY NEWg Published Daily . -'17.:':::•'$,:.... j."i=':'INFORMATIORMEETING.:-.. Naples,FL 34110 The public Is invited to.a.tier.id a.;neighborhood:rneetinifield.hy•RObert:14pOare,.AIPP,:? • • Affidavit of Publicati. ' .. . Of HOle..1%;lontes, Inc and Richard .YOvanoVichi,•-•,#SOL.iita,: 6f.Oblerrian.:•*016(10...&-!.;,. • .Kooster, PA,on behalf ofthe property owner at the following time and lObatiOn:.:',"';':".-..' State of Florida .. . . . . • .-- ..... . ' • Monday,January 314, 01.. .-at'•$:30 p ..? .•.- .:::••.-'.',-.-•:•.,'''7.:':::. . ...' ..•'.. . '....' ' .• ' HaWtharli:Stiitei6f:NaPles..'-z • '.. ''-.• ...•• -':-- ...:'•----....7'',,''.,: Counties of Collier and Lee S,'•,-; :,.'.. ...' " .- : ..8557-Pine:Ridge Road,7.,''''.'•'..:''' .'.--'' ..: -,:'..-:. '.... .''.; ''..•' • • Bef-Ore the underSigned they serve as the=the- -...• ' '"::-:''" - -, • ',- . : ‘:'• • ' Naples,FL 34109 - .•••'•'.'-:!';'.•:.',.::.:•::......-•:"''' '.'.' . . --: • -..•. .',.--..:. - - .. .•-• •• . .. • appeared MarvLynn Roeller, who on oath sa} - - ,- .., ••• :. ':.. ..: .. •. •:..'i: ; :'• .... ''.....,..-..,.-. "*. .. * •... • ..- , . :':-,• ::: ' - .. . as the Advertising AcOclintiniMaiTager of the- 41-thjecti.propert?:,"Consists of J.3.65±ethres located on the South side of PiriejlIciget! a daily newvaperpublished at Naples, in c. .Road iri: ection i 8 Township 49 Sciuth, Range 26-Eastiln Collier 60(inty,.Floritle. . . ... Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee countt- • " • -•—•••• '- •" ' ' •' • '' " :"- - ": '-"' i.-'. ''•"-" ' ° • • - i . The Property owner is requesting to rezone 13,,65 acreslOOStedon:trie south side of '. the attached copy Of the advertising,being a Pine Ridge Road epprOximately..pn4-quartpr of a.mile east of LiVie.igeteh19OedA07.b._0•-,:- approximately.. ,. . . ..,..,........•.: .•• .. .....,. conaiStientiittrp011ierQOuntyd Growth Managemerilplah.:gnd surrouriding/adjoinlhg- PUBLIC NOTICE property uses The current zCirilng of the 1±trot60t ..16..!.'117:'A6001t(4.*10:ailspeol41.,.: . . . - Treetrrie ];OVerlek--($T)::.The proposed (eiprie:•ila for A cothrt)0e6tir,r.olgio.d:•<•001f.,.:-: in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE Deve160iiielit.:.(OPV0):_aiiel io:adWarri6der.iirr■Of.1'..4i000;6iiti46-;f6kadbii;itiiei.dat:: I. develOpMent:,'.oengistiug,of..1,Z0,000* square feet.r of office and medical'OSOS:arcin•, was published in said newspaper 1 time in t' 25 000±square feet of retail use:parmittacilaaarnaSt atsolndli40bipuld.cara-laciittlas.,. : cm January 24,2012 (assisted living units)at a floor area ratlOOf.,0.60 up to 26•units per_SCreAlaci perr.rilited,..*.; are hotel andMotel'O*;at 26 units per acre For each aCee,Cf-OP40 care or hOtel.pr:.," , , .• . ..,,... • .., ... . use shall be subtracted from thetotal.:'. Affiant Amber says-that the said Naples Daily News is. •MPte!'ue"19iP?q stijar :fe9tP.f..rtpil or office published•atNapies,in said Collier Gounty,Florida,and- amount of allowable otiMineraial square footage Also proposed is preservation of newspaper has heretofore been continuously published i .3.1 0+:6eiras of..natiya-‘yetlartc4,uplands and buffers ':.,- :.•,- -,.....:, :.-.::.,-.....: ..'.......... •:- .:! County, Florida;distributed in Coiner•and Lee counties -•;.' ''''''''''',:','• -,J- '"': "_' ' 7--',;' ••'''"-'• •• ;:'':''''''. ,-..:'• "' .' •'- " ',....,_."- :':•'"•-S•-' ....:,• L.: ...., ' ' in** each day and has bean entered as second class mail nxatt . •••'• 7!!71-77.1:-Iri.7:7".-• :),';,:;:-.*.•.'•••. :,....; .'.':.,::.',..:-•: ,•::,.,-'...'. -'..-:: -.:':. ::.:-'..•.,:e).• '''.:."""....',...,.•"L . ,. i'..:-" ,; of5e in Naples,.in said Collier County,Florida,for a :.. ... —..-(..... ,- ' -'. : •:. . . .7.15-- - . .: –- -,:.--• .• 7::•: : •'.- =•••... ; --,,.... -),.ear next preceding the first publication,of the attar - .. : _ . . . .- : • 7, .-..-:: • ...: .: . .: : -•••.. , !-s• 141: .... adveatisemext and affiant further says that he has ninth : .• ' . .1-- .• • . I Ail •-- •-. . " ' •• . cn. .... . - promised any person, firm or corporation any discot4 ' . ....H . • : ..•. .2: • .. -4.■.' 4 . commits-ion orrefiind for the purpose of securing this ad - • . / • - publication in the said,ewspaper. PHYSiC t .. PA Li) 41 afirli7 • A ,. REGION Ma. 4 12, pi ,. . - . . . ' 1.40171 L' .. -ItrriCi - • - V lki,LIU itaint i 1 )11' • •• '- • -'7721._ ) , 4t:'1 -7H • , ' ." ' ' • • ° • •-- (Signature of ffi ) . cc -.-4- -- .Niini' • '• --'T'712aV' : '. . " • • . . • Sworn to and subscribed before-me Tb This 25th dcir of January,2012 "'" '' - ' . ' '"' '' '- 1- - . -7 -.- -.' . - . . gam-L. f 172Nanycit6 ..):::.:•:A•1 •:_.-\--- :;.•-( ') . t• ---.----7 .--. 11--- ... ..9....:•.: .14- 1 -•-• -... (Signature of notary public)/ . , . ,•-.:.: _.,--.,..•:•:, : .- . ..• '•::-• . ..• t- WE yAt.usypv.P-INpuT KAROL•E'KANSAS • ,Boainess-.0pd".prOPerty,OWnerei residente'And'.Visitoi's *e Welbol710 to attend the Natal/Palk-Slate al Rerida if 5..teeerilati6h.-ehd•Sekq0estio0a'aliout the.project the owner and Collier.4oUnty..1: 0 4! 4*9 . SA. JR4.., ;* My Comm.Expires Jul 29,2013 .,., .., .,. ,._ . . .,. ..- ,_,... .. .staff(11ycif-1 are.ilhOleIO'Pttellcrtt0 ri)eetiOg,but have que.gicms,of ybrtirivptg,:lhey:.... q6",`,,,tt,ss commission#on 912237 ' ' can be direOatltiji.irli011,Otlion ;-,Oi..elit,dil fO':::-::,..,:-"-'..-.-: ':....i.',.. •••.'.•:.'.•.' ::',-..•::'-:::-.'.:z..).;'.'.....:. .., .".PrftiWiti4.ER0601tei:iti01)/10*:i.::...:*::... .::j,:,.::.,:.:,..:::' Departrrenf',6fLarid:Dev6lbjtirniaitt Ben/tee'. - . . - . . .. .:,- • .. . .. .... ...• , , — •,...,: _.,. .,•, • • • • ,..• .. ..•,. •.- ... ..,.,... .,. ,.. „ , .'''...:.,.:i.. :;'.:-.:.........-,... - .: -2800 N...:Floiteghee..priso;:,-Naolop,.:FlOrida34.104::.".‘.......:';•.:.'''.... ":;.,..',1-;•,,-:::-.. r '.-'' -•.:'•...-,. • - -- :. 131-iona.,(239)252:2931,..•-.•••• -..-• .. -- :-... .•,-:. .. . . .-. • :.= .. . • ..... -.- • . . kaydesaiemQbolOrgo.v.liei. •- ...;. . . -. .•' ..., , ,..---, . . No.240173980 ' - ..7 ..-.:.. ‘. . " -..' . ... . . . lannary 24..2012 '. - • • . . . . ... ._ . _ .. ...... . ..... . . . . • • ' Packet Page-3294- .. - - "• — — • • — •••• - • • - ..-- --• • Easy peel®Labels i ® =MI send along line to i s- �� -__ _ Use Ave,y©Template MO® I Feed Paper ® expose Pop-up d9eTM j 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 12895 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN LLC 3439 PINE RIDGE ROAD LLC 3500 CORPORATE PLAZA %HL STATUTORY AGENT INC 3439 PINE RIDGE RD UNIT 301 PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN R00 LAUREL OAK DR STE 600 NAPLES,FL 34109-3884 3530 KRAFT RD STE 204 PLES,FL 34108-2705 NAPLES,FL 34105-5020 • 3500 CORPORATE PLAZA 3500 CORPORATE PLAZA 3500 CORPORATE PLAZA PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSN PLAZA OWNER'S ASSN PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN 3530 KRAFT RD STE 204 3530 KRAFT RD STE 204 3530 KRAFT RD STE 204 NAPLES,FL 34105-5020 NAPLES,FL 34105-5020 NAPLES,FL 34105-5020 3500 CORPORATE PLAZA AEG CAMBRIDGE SQUARE LLC ALBANESE,WIENDY PROPERTY OWNERS'ASSN 3435 PINE RIDGE RD STE 101 12907 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN 3530 KRAFT RD STE 204 NAPLES,FL 34109-3828 NAPLES, FL 34105-4802 NAPLES,FL 34105-5020 ALTEEN,EDITH ANUCINSKI,KARIN L AVOW HOSPICE INC 12978 BRYNWOOD WAY i 12937 BRYNWOOD WAY 1095 WHIPPOORWILL LN NAPLES,FL 34105--4804 NAPLES, FL 34105--4806 NAPLES, FL 34105-3847 AVOW HOSPICE INC BAY WINDS LODGING LLC BAY WINDS LODGING LLC 1095 WHIPPOORWILL LN 3557 PINE RIDGE RD 3557 PINE RIDGE RD. NAPLES,FL 34105-3847 ' NAPLES,FL 34109-3884 NAPLES, FL 34109-3884 • • BLACK,NANCY K BRIDGETT,SHELLEY DEE BRYNWOOD PRESERVE RESIDENTS 12929 BRYNWOOD WAY KIERAN FRESHWATER ASSOCIATION INC NAPLES,FL 34105 1806 12990 BRYNWOOD WAY %SANDCASTLE MONNUMITY MGT NAPLES,FL 34105-4804 PO BOX 8478 NAPLES,FL 34101-8478 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE RESIDENTS BRYNWOOD PRESERVE RESIDENTS BRYNWOOD PRESERVE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC ASSOCIATION INC ASSOCIATION INC %SANDCASTLE COMMUNITY MGT %SANDCASTLE COMMUNITY MGT %SANDCASTLE COMMUNITY MGT PO BOX 8478 PO BOX 8478 PO BOX 8478 NAPLES,FL 34101--8478 NAPLES,FL 34101-8478 NAPLES, FL 34101-8478 BUCOLO,JEROME A=&KATHLEEN I BURES,RON CAM SQUARE LLC 6480 EDGEWOOD DR 4952 MOUNTAIN FOLIAGE DR 1455 BLUE POINT AVE LOCKPORT, NY 14094-1182 LAS VEGAS,NV 89148-1429 NAPLES,FL 34102-0560 • CAMBRIDGE SQUARE CAMBRIDGE SQUARE OF NAPLES LC CHAIT, DOUGLAS C NAPLES GATEWAY MASTER ASSN INC 2171 PINE RIDGE RD 12970 BRYNWOOD WAY TOM WHITE HAWTHORNE SUITES NAPLES,FL 34109--2002 NAPLES,FL 34105-4804 3757 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES,FL 34109 3879 • COLLIER CNTY COTO,JOSEPH A=&LISA 0 DECKER,MARCIA S 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E 12925 BRYNWOOD WAY 12994 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES,FL 34112-4961 NAPLES,FL 34105-4806 NAPLES,FL 34105-4804 20 t. % d8 5 4 peger i se�c Packet Page-3295-1ure On de 1 WWW.aVeBycOm "lam le ga ae6tAW Y®5 16 0® 1 chargemen .v:v.,...c.�dn.d Pap-upTM I 1-300-G0-AVERY Easy Peel®Labels A ffIMNIM Bend along line to g/25/2012 Item 17.A. Use Avery®Template 5160® A Feed Paper ® expose Pop-up EdgeT"' DEMALLIE,JAMES G DICKERSON,PETER J=&ANN C DREW,NICHOLAS J=&CAROLYN J STEPHANIE SHOCKLEY DEMALLIE 26 FAULKNER HILL RD DEPT#43-0323 12909 BRYNWOOD WAY ACTON,MA 01720-4232 PO BOX 25234 NAPLES,FL 34105--4806 MIAMI,FL 33102-0000 DSG PROPERTY LLC FESIK,ROBERT J=&PAULA C FIRST COMMUNITY BANK 9095 THE LANE 12941 BRYNWOOD WAY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA NAPLES,FL 34109-2507 NAPLES,FL 34105-4806 1565 RED CEDAR DR FORT MYERS,FL 33907-7687 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF THE FIRST NATL BK O/T GULF COAST FIRST NATL BK O/T GULF COAST GULF COAST 1415 PANTHER LN STE 164 1415 PANTHER LN STE 164 3560 KRAFT RD NAPLES,FL 34109--7874 NAPLES,FL 34109--7874 NAPLES,FL 34105-5035 FIRST NAIL BK 0/T GULF COAST FIRST NATL BK O/T GULF COAST FIRST NATL BK 0/T GULF COAST 1415 PANTHER LN STE 164 1415 PANTHER LN STE 164 1415 PANTHER LN STE 164 NAPLES,FL 34109--7874 NAPLES,FL 34109-7874 NAPLES, FL 34109--7874 G C T PROPERTIES LMTD PRTNRSHP GEANTA,CHANDRA ANN GERMAIN REAL ESTATE CO LLC PO BOX.880 12917 BRYNWOOD WAY 13315 TAMIAMI TRL N FORT MYERS,FL 33902-0880 NAPLES,FL 34105--4806 NAPLES, FL 34110-6338 • Allak • GERMAIN REAL ESTATE CO LLC GOLDSTEIN,PEGGY GONZALEZ,JOSE=&GUMERSINDA 13315 TAMIAMI TRL N 12879 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN 12962 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES,FL 34110---6338 NAPLES,FL 34105-4802 NAPLES, FL 34105-4804 GREENWAY TR, IAN PAUL HELLER,FRIEDRICH HUGO HICKS,JODY L=&SHIRLEY A LORALEE M GREENWAY TR ELEONORA H HELLER 12974 BRYNWOOD WAY IAN P&L M GREENWAY LIV TRUST C/O SLAB TO SHINGLES NAPLES, FL 34105-4804 67 ROSSLAND RD EOSHAWA,ON 615 NURSERY LN CANADA, L1G2W-0000 NAPLES,FL 34119-9714 HOSPICE OF NAPLES INC INSOUTH BANK KOPIDAKIS,MARIANNA 1095 WHIPPOORWILL LN C/O NATALIE LANE VP 4251 GULF SHORE BLVD N APT 18A NAPLES,FL 34105--3847 111 S WASHINGTON AVE NAPLES,FL 34103-3425 BROWNSVILLE,TN 38012-3033 KOVACEVIC,IVAN=&ANA KRAFT OFFICE CENTER LLC LINK,ANTHONY CHARLES 12942 BRYNWOOD WAY 3530 KRAFT RD STE 204 JAYE MICHELLE LINK NAPLES,FL 34105-4804 NAPLES,FL 34105-5020 12875 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105-4802 LIVINGSTON AND PINE RIDGE LLC LJIKOVIC,SAFEDIN MARQUINA,JOSE R=&CANDICE A 75 NE 6TH AVE STE 101 12667 BISCAYNE CT 12954 BRYNWOOD WAY DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483-5452 NAPLES,FL 34105-4935 NAPLES,FL 34105-4804 fades paler Se 5160® Packet Page-3296—e afro del www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5160 1 chargement reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-G0-AVERY 1 Easy Peel®Labels A MEM Bend along line to i -- ----- Use Avery®Template5160® I Feed Paper ® expose Pop-up EdgetM 1 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. MARTIN,DONALD H=&MARY ANN MC MAHON JR,MARTIN L METTLER,KARL-HEINZ=&SILVIA 1301 WHIPPOORWILL LN 12933 BRYNWOOD WAY C/O GERMAN SERVICES, INC. NAPLES,FL 34105-4842 NAPLES,FL 34105-4806 3960 RADIO RD STE 208 NAPLES, FL 34104-3746 MITROMARAS,ANN M NAPLES FLORIDA REAL EST I LLC NEUROLOGY PHYSICIANS BUILDING 45 NIAGARA ST 12921 BRYNWOOD WAY AND LAND LLC MILLER PLACE,NY 11764-2619 NAPLES,FL 34105-4806 1660 MEDICAL BLVD STE 200 NAPLES,FL 34110-1416 NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL NOVOTNY,ROBERT M=&GERALYN A O'GORMAN TR,CATHERINE M AND RESCUE DISTRICT 13002 BRYNWOOD WAY CATHERINE M O'GORMAN REV TRUST 1885 VETERANS PARK DR NAPLES,FL 34105-4804 UTD 8/10/05 NAPLES,FL 34109-0492 12887 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES,FL 34105-4802 OLSON,GARY R=&JENNIFER T ORGAN,PHILLIP J PARRIMOOR DEV, L.L.0 12867 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN 12958 BRYNWOOD WAY C/O JON D PARRISH NAPLES,FL 34105--4802 NAPLES,FL 34105-4804 3431 PINE RIDGE RD STE 101 NAPLES,FL 34109--3834 PARRIMOOR DEV, LLC PAUL,SCOT K PERKINS,JOHN T=&ALICE S 0/0 JON D PARRISH 12918 BRYNWOOD WAY 12871 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN 3431 PINE RIDGE RD STE 101 NAPLES,FL 34105--0000 NAPLES,FL 34105-4802 NAPLES,FL 34109-3834 INE RIDGE INVESTORS OF NAPLES PINE RIDGE LIVINGSTON,LLC PINE RIDGE/HAWTHORNE 2606 HORSESHOE DR S C/O RON BAILEY,JR CPA DEELOPMENT LLC NAPLES,FL 34104-6121 PO BOX 111419 999 VANDERBILT BCH RD#102 NAPLES,FL 34108-0124 NAPLES,FL 34108-0000 PKZ HOLDING COMPANY REFERENCE ONLY REFERENCE ONLY C/O MARC OATES FIRST NATIONAL BANK CENTER CAMBRIDGE SQUARE OFFICE 5515 BRYSON DR STE 502 A COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM PARK A CONDOMINIUM NAPLES,FL 34109-0923 , —0000 , —0000 STEELE,FREDERICK P=&DIANE K STUART TR,CHARLA B WITTOCK,JULIE KENISTON 4336 E CHASE FUN CHARLA B STUART LIV TRUST 3463 PINE RIDGE RD STE 102 HAMILTON,OH 45011-0000 UTD 7/17/06 NAPLES,FL 34109---3836 12982 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES,FL 34105---4804 YU,ZHILIANG ZUMPANO,DAVID J=&CHRISTINE E TONGDAN YANG 437 RANSOM AVE 12883 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN SHERRILL,NY 13461-1446 NAPLES,FL 34105--4802 etiquettes fades a paler� ® sensde Packet Page-3297->;reaflnde1 wwwaverycom ; Utliisez le gabarit AVERY 5760 d chargement .-�-�-.-Pop-up7M i 1-800-GO-AVERY '� 091.8/O91.9r,fumy ca�E aigll2dwoa ww L9 x ww 8E lEwaol ap alraribil3 g/25/2012 Item 17.A. • 091.8/091.9® anv qvM aiq!ledwoo„8/9 Z x„L azls AEI Golden Gate Area Civic Association I Homeowners Association Golden Gate Area Civic Association 3153 41st Street SW of Golden Gate 5391 19th Place SW Naples,FL 34113 • I 2335 Tamiami Trail, Suite 308 • ! Naples,FL 34116 Naples, FL 34103 Brynwood Preserve Home Owners Association 12852 Brynwood Preserve Lane ,: ; i i Naples,FL 34105 Astitt • • • • • • • • • I' . I ' is i ,. . label size-Packet Page-3298-Avery®5160/8160 %ig) - Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. BRYNWOOD CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 'JANUARY 30,2012 NAME ADDRESS TEL.NO. \B� tea l ; t l,0 c W 0itui4j ..k. Lrt- d 233-'Z(L-3>S2- JUN 1 / 4rfo 23 3L 3-737 v ��t s-a), i-"t -AR'3t� S r S 1J11- �� 3 C-517 �',1 �, ��.� /c1 , , �} /nip l C•.E t")c49 jNa�aCF� 11jAVAR16L a0 1I7b� I1/Pt , C15— WHI PP Og4.VJE r eV/59�-- (1 C ,'I ru y /36°2- /,/ 3 \-kc,(,,1 LAI, 2_9 s Li ,oc, (.__13 • 7- 9 OV---(31 /-4441AAi 5o1.2 9Y6 crate., ZA7 /V 2S-V- O() if4c, F .FE-c lfi /3 �r i tt -Pf e,1 7 7S-- (O 0 H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\NIM\NIM Sign-In Sheet-don Packet Page-3299- SS Jd'Br Bd 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. S3-1dVN dO '. .•.,'.'•.:LN31ydo13n3q.'*MX3015311'__• -------- -- ----SWBB3ad...., . :•301dsOH .„Ofldr.vo.s E1d':QOO, N�.�19 ' •'3ns-: a.DNuSlx . . - -—— om.. M ?,.• -- -- - -- • r---r• a �.,I.It{ m .. \ a o � I b ! N R 1 Y a 11:E.1. 'I11 a rp€t I: .I a I gr gg �" 3; , '. ii o I FI 03g _l .Ea Z 0. .,,, I < a Z z,v°e W �� z 1 •I• COm z az+z 1 U W� ova° 1 x :j•. CI 0 pP'.at^m`^ !� .M20. < 4 _IV° o W , <9r a3 a J a m I QRg rY ^ I: 1 J I.. II I II V' g .CC w r , i III oII II o : : ..' F-o ^ I!1111 11l11i!i' liR,l 1' f i!fil ! 11 I!''I I V I II II1II Ilt1,1 \\ rc € I I 2 I III I' U E F 4. I 1'p111111 I:il Ihlaiil \ W •�� ^ ^ 1 liil11IIII 1 ° l�i!Il'j!llll'' �� 9 I W ;e $I �.g III 1liqI 84t Q C I I' r o 00o z Ji it!IN PI!, o. II I;�{ z Z ,- lI I. ..°rn y �°aaY a //'.. 1•II:.'Ij�11 I.1 ' m�..z U oa a 2„' t-'7,5g lg 3 / I'••;' ..'+, !.....ii`lY,l.....II I eI„.,,,,,,,,•i it I I I�i�l ME � t w 1 / y..• •.. � I n I i�,Ih i l(iI l 11lif li�i!i•l LYtltlIIW k a / J f 1 I aor /z i �� ,� z,'.,‘',6 / I W i IIIIl1Ii o <° / I I• „ Es q ot I L - . . w. •> o / 4 YS � f o. 5 1 I Ili llil 11 I r'. x;E d �_ �8y� �,�+ IYM�:II ° Z 1j•• W• • 4i , E,0-66 ° F : 4g - - -1g °mF°¢ tiff 1�1.,,11� Y 3. !C, Q 6 g �y�m Nx4g DU r<2 1°18,0°."' h >LL fir!, mz I'!IIliVV�ii a 0 I, W, '$'^10 g J'x8•g4Z"< I �,; _ Z � Z � Zuy<R -Er j! N p°an O n< qWE .... ,-,,4 t(w 'd 7 1I I1'7 — °•, , -i •72 L.. g g' t55E.+rw * 4 . K q4g Z A° dil* ° g 6- I \e yew<pEsE d ,I. *Z cm$6Ev Y F e9. S ggm Ir1ol' 1111-•:•;:'.:':.:: F, B 1i m%?..6 .¢u < _ lm P,,e En 1 �l'. '4 ggo ,4°,a,,°'o.. .! amo° a*, g. iB<g°g tllll 1.' � Q z o8 � < � III. � 1' o m ,v°m rc,d Tjm rah a rI � IIII! / , W • NC N.- tf S� qq x' 1lE a s >0 I 1 , > , - Q O i a g fA n n7 °o � " I 0 m 5a L—' .. I—LL0. gDE 8mowi'F�'� TI. 0 P.'g ; �j °wO o - RW.d O ICC '_ ,v Za ° W W ri 2 WB' WKC W 00 = ., ,.Om4 .. 1,,,O d m d o Ll SSW R oo�. � �z� z �ng$°u O rc a ag > rc a ° � .t .i n ,AI 1 I�6! z a +� w§ `< Z ob z° <a la a m z ,A.7,-., o w {1! Z::�, & rF d< cd g F oo 1020 c 9 ' z 5 _ - J _°I -- 4 Z � c O CO g <9aK' C7 uor w m' w°^ x °m '�':}�''rL_ m 0 Y u4° F wooz I i • wam < .,,‹.. Z 6 U WY W ❑I-�° i t Z c I a•aa.'' a /1"' Q — r § g . w 0 di ∎ 1 f � F a I• .± NN ~� N�_I u ! 1 w a ads 1 � � � _ o .1g- � jn• ---- L—..--j Z tL a < 6'1: B� Nm i / t` § < I'< Bb tl cr a d,ill- w DI 0 _ d '0 1 Cfl --......- QVOd 3J01li 3wd o3 38 Packet Page -3300- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 PERMITTED AND PROPOSED USES 1. Current Zoning The zoning of the property is "A" Agriculture with a Special Treatment Overlay ("ST"). The ST overlay is used for those lands that are environmentally sensitive and are of historical archeological significance where the essential ecological or culture value of the land is not adequately protected under the base zoning district regulations established by the Collier County Land Development Code. The overlay boundaries, however, are very approximate and are eventually replaced by accurately defined preserve boundaries when the property is developed. A copy of the permitted uses in the A Zoning District is attached and it also•includes accessory uses, and Conditional uses which require County Board of Commissioners approval. A zoning map is also attached depicting the land zoned A and ST. 2. Proposed Zoning and Uses The zoning application proposes to delete the A and ST zoning classifications of the property and replace this with a Commercial Planned Unit Development with a specific set of approved uses. The proposed uses in this CPUD are set forth in the attached Exhibit A. • H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\NIM\BRYNWOOD CENTER NIM HANDOUT 1-30-2012.docx Packet Page-3301- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Amokir EXHIBIT A LIST OF PERMITTED USES BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: (Uses denoted with an asterix* below are prohibited within 400 feet from the south property line of this CPUD. However, automobile repair shops shall be setback 600 feet; gasoline stations are permitted only on Pine Ridge Road frontage; and additional restrictions apply to accessory use drinking places inside the 400 foot setback area for hotel/motel). A. Commercial Uses 1. Accounting,Auditing and Bookkeeping Services (8721) 2. Apparel and Accessory Stores (5611)* 3. Architectural Services (8712) 4. Automobile and Home Supply Stores (5531)* 5. Automobile Service and repair shops general (7538)* (see Exhibit B, Section IV) 6. Banks, commercial: national (6021) 7. Banks, commercial: state (6022) 8. Banks, commercial: Not Federally Chartered (6029) 9. Banks, savings: Federal (6035) 10. Banks, savings: Not Federally Chartered (6036) 11. Barber Shops (7241)* 12. Beauty Shops (7231)* 13. Book Stores (5942)* 14. Business Consulting Services—not elsewhere classified (8748) 15. Camera Stores (5946)* 16. Carpet and Upholstery Cleaning (7217)* 17. Candy,Nut and Confectionery Stores (5441)* 18. Children's and Infants' Wear Stores (5641)* 19. Chiropractors Offices & Clinics (8041) 20. Commercial Economic, Sociological and Educational Research (8732) 21. Commercial Physical and Biological Research (8731) 22. Computer and Computer Software Stores (5734)* 23. Credit Unions, Federally Chartered (6061) 24. Credit Unions, State: Not Federally Chartered (6062) 25. Dairy Products Stores (5451) ANL 26. Dental Laboratories (8072) H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\NIM\NIM Hs ' ' •`• . .. .. ...?.docx Packet Page-3302- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 27. Dentist Offices &Clinics (8021) 28. Department Stores (5311)* 29. Doctors -Medicine Offices & Clinics (8011) 30. Doctors - Osteopathy Offices & Clinics (8031) 31. Doctors - Chiropractors Offices &Clinics (8041) 32. Drapery, Curtain and Upholstery Stores (5714)* 33. Drinking Places (see Exhibit B, Section V) (5813)* 34. Drug Stores and Propriety Stores (5912)* 35. Eating Places (with no outdoor music, television sets or open (5812)* windows other than pass through for food) 36. Engineering Services (8711) 37. Facilities Support Management Services (8744) 38. Family Clothing Stores (5651)* 39. Floor Covering Stores (5713)* 40. Florists (5992)* 41. Fruit and Vegetable Markets (5431)* 42. Funeral Service only(excluding Crematories) (7261)* 43. Furniture Stores (5712)* 44. Garment Pressing and Agents for Laundries and Drycleaners (7212)* 45. Gasoline Stations (see Exhibit B, Section IV) (5541)* 46. General Medical and Surgical Hospitals (8062) 47. General Merchandise Stores (groups) (5311)* 48. Grocery Stores (5411)* 49. Hardware Store (5251)* 50. Health and Allied Services-not elsewhere classified (8099) 51. Health practitioners Offices & Clinics -not elsewhere classified (8049) 52. Home Furniture,Furnishing and Equipment Stores (5712)* 53. Home health care services (8082) 54. Hotels and Motels (drinking places are an accessory use only in (7011) conjunction with hotel/motel)(see also Exhibit B, Section V) 55. Household Appliance Stores (5722)* 56. Insurance Agents, Brokers and Service (6411) 57. Kidney Dialysis Centers (8092) 58. Legal Services (8111) 59. Management Consulting Services (8742) 60. Management Services (8741) 61. Meat and Fish(Seafood)Markets, including Freezer Provisioners • (5421)* 62. Medical Laboratories (8071) 63. Men's and Boy's Clothing and Accessory Stores (5611)* 64. Miscellaneous Apparel and Accessory Stores (5699)* 65. Miscellaneous Food Stores (5499)* 66. Miscellaneous General Merchandise Stores (5399)* 67. Miscellaneous Homefumishings Stores (5719)* 68. Miscellaneous personal services,not elsewhere classified excluding (7299) massage parlors,steam baths, tattoo parlors and Turkish baths 69. Miscellaneous Retail Stores -not elsewhere classified (5999)* H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\NIM\NIM Handout-Exhibit A 01-30-2012.docx Packet Page-3303- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 70. Musical Tnstrument Stores (5736)* 71. Noncommercial Research Organizations (8733) 72. Nursing and Personal Care Facilities-not elsewhere classified (8059) 73. Optical Goods Stores (5995)* 74. Optometrists-Offices & Clinics (8042) 75. Paint, Glass &Wallpaper Stores (5231)* 76. Photographic Studios,Portrait (7221) 77. Physical Fitness Facilities (7991) 78. Podiatrists-Offices &Clinics (8043) 79. Public Relations Services (8743) 80. Radio, Television and Consumer Electronics Stores (5731)* 81. Real Estate Agents and Managers (6531) 82. Record and Prerecorded Tape Stores (adult video rental or sales (5735)* prohibited) 83. Retail Bakeries (5461)* 84. Retail Nurseries, Lawn&Garden Supply Stores (5261)* 85. Shoe Repair Shops and Shoeshine Parlors (7251)* 86. Shoe Stores (5661)* 87. Specialty Hospitals, except psychiatric (8069) 88. Specialty Outpatient Facilities-not elsewhere classified (8069) 89. Sporting Goods Stores and Bicycle Shops (5941)* 90. Surveying Services (8713) 91. Tax Return Preparation Services (7291) 92. Testing Laboratories (8734) 93. Travel Agencies (4724) 94. Used Furniture Stores (5932)* 95. Variety Stores (5331)* 96. Veterinary Services for Animal Specialties (0742)* 97. Video Tape Rental, (adult video rental or sales prohibited) (7841)* 98. Women's Accessory and Specialty Stores (5632)* 99. Women's Clothing Stores (5621)* B. Preserve areas. C. Any other commercial or professional use comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent of the district determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals,pursuant to the LDC. II. PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES FOR GROUP HOUSING/RETIREMENT COMMUNITY USES THROUGHOUT THIS CPUD: A. Group Housing 8051, Skilled Nursing, Inteu.uediate Care Facilities 8052,Nursing and Personal Care not else classified 8059. B. Independent living units. H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\NIM\NIM Ha Packet Page-3304 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. C. Assisted living units. , D. Retirement community. III. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES: A. Uses and structures that are accessory,and incidental to the permitted uses of the CPUD document. B. Drinking places (Group 5813, only in conjunction with eating places). C. Exterior speakers for drive-through facilities such as a bank or fast food restaurant only outside the 400-foot setback area from the south property line. D. Signs as permitted in the LDC. E. Stormwater Management Areas. F. Swimming pools and recreational facilities such as tennis courts for hotel/motel guests. G. Parking(7521) except tow-in parking lots. H. Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals,pursuant to the LDC. • H:12006120060631WP\Rezone\Rezone 20111NIM1NIM Handout-Exhibit A 01-30-2012.docx Packet Page-3305- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. istgb A% -:'" 'i$ < M a g y a 4 0 uui 1 N i N -'_5=1=-MV- /13sgSa --- r----------------------------�, 1E1 il 11 I e i.- -,.. ` > ``i Al E. Z le el w 1' e O ' 1010, `",`Y ; 1, J W iCC►ii n to N 1 _____L_ I t/ W iii n r i V i...mr, --' r' i' i 2 1 6; i LL t I P4 ( , ,��k sw ssas.sa s ssse - 3° :� r �: ' !i Y za"-".sa s sea= - ,5 ae,s -1_ /ff ``I ��I '/� N ,- _ �.. a _.'�` S Ai_ ' % Y ¢ ;-2" 2g Y F U 1 Si � 0 3 W R _5 - ,.t 3. tu F 2>_ 1 N •, c� S • , i;eCY N- S,GW- 5 2m 1 w F €EE"sue €Q o�".E E II � ; :ELY °^ - E I �■ Q Z sa ee: a : : ;.y. Y 10 10 t i v !1J cc 1 Li 4o. 04 O y P�:14:a I co W II N `tl d? a LLI Ir II /4) v a co co 1 I I 1 1 UVQ�{ 3 e I �1 E I 3NId ■ • 41®®®1 .-...�....... not m.w IS-10.11.,....MI,, ne.,n_...,.M...w Packet Page-3306- Municode 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 2.03.01 -Agricultural Zoning Districts. . A. Rural Agricultural District(A).The purpose and intent of the rural agricultural district(A)is to provide lands for agricultural,pastoral,and rural land uses by accommodating traditional agricultural, agricultural related activities and facilities,support facilities related to agricultural needs,and conservation uses.Uses that are generally considered compatible to agricultural uses that would not endanger or damage the agricultural, environmental, potable water,or wildlife resources of the County,are permissible as conditional uses in the A district.The A district corresponds to and implements the AgriculturaVRural land use designation on the future land use map of the Collier County GMP,and in some instances,may occur in the designated urban area.The maximum density permissible in the rural agricultural district within the urban mixed use district shall be guided, in part, by the density rating system contained in the future land use element of the GMP.The maximum density permissible or permitted in A district shall not exceed the density permissible under the density rating system.The maximum density permissible in the A district within the agricultural/rural district of the future land use element of the Collier County GMP shall be consistent with and not exceed the density permissible or permitted under the agricultural/rural district of the future land use element. 1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the rural agricultural district(A). a. Permitted uses. 1. Single-family dwelling. 2. Agricultural activities,including, but not limited to:Crop raising; horticulture;fruit and nut production;forestry;groves;nurseries; ranching; beekeeping; poultry and egg production; milk production;livestock raising,and aquaculture for native species subject to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission permits. i. The following permitted uses shall only be allowed on parcels 20 acres in size or greater: a) dairying; b) ranching; c) poultry and egg production; d) milk production; e) livestock raising; and f) animal breeding, raising,training,stabling or kenneling. ii. On parcels less than 20 acres in size,individual property owners are not precluded from the keeping of the following for personal use and not in association with a commercial agricultural activity provided there are no open feed lots: a) Fowl or poultry, not to exceed 25 in total number; and b) Horses and livestock(except for hogs)not to exceed two such animals for each acre. 3. Wholesale reptile breeding and raising (non-venomous),subject to the following standards: i. Minimum 20 acre parcel size; ii. Any roofed structure used for the shelter and/or feeding of such reptiles shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from any lot line. 4. Wildlife management, plant and wildlife conservancies,wildlife refuges and sanctuaries. 5. Conservation uses. 6. Oil and gas exploration subject to state drilling permits and Collier County site development plan review procedures. 7. Family care facilities,subject to section 5.05.04 8. Communications towers up to specified height,subject to section 5.05.09 9. Essential services,as set forth in section 2.01.03 10. Schools,public,including"Educational plants." b. Accessory uses. 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the uses permitted as of right in the A district. 2. Farm labor housing,subject to section 5.05.03 3. Retail sale of fresh,unprocessed agricultural products,grown primarily on the property and subject to a review of traffic circulation, parking,and safety concerns pursuant to the submission of a site improvement plan as provided for in section 10.02.03 4. Packinghouse or similar agricultural processing of farm products produced on the property subject to the following restrictions: • Packet Page-3307-,bequest=http%3a%2f%2fli... 1/27/2012 http://library.municode.con/print.aspx?cu. .. �„., -�-��- Municode 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Agricultural packing, processing or similar facilities shall be located on a major or minor arterial street,or shall have access to an arterial street by a public street that does not abut properties zoned RSF-1 thru RSF-6, RMF-6, RMF-12,RMF-16, RT,VR, MH,TTRVC and PUD or are residentially used. ii. A buffer yard of not less than 150 feet in width shall be provided along each boundary of the site which abuts any residentially zoned or used property,and shall contain an Alternative B type buffer as defined within section 4.06.00.Such buffer and buffer yard shall be in lieu of front,side,or rear yards on that portion of the lot which abuts those districts and uses identified in subsection 2.03.01 A.1.b.4.i.above. Iii. The facility shall emit no noxious,toxic,or corrosive dust, dirt,fumes,vapors, or gases which can cause damage to human health,to animals or vegetation,or to other forms of property beyond the lot line of the use creating the emission. iv. A site development plan shall be provided in accordance with section 10.02.03 5. Excavation and related processing and production subject to the following criteria: i. The activity is clearly incidental to the agricultural development of the property. ii. The affected area is within a surface water management system for agricultural use as permitted by the South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD). iii. The amount of excavated material removed from the site cannot exceed 4,000 cubic yards.Amounts in excess of 4,000 cubic yards shall require conditional use approval for earthmining,pursuant to the procedures and conditions set forth in Chapter 10. 6. Guesthouses,subject to section 5.03.03 7. Private boathouses and docks on lake,canal or waterway lots,subject to section 5.03.06 S. Use of a mobile home as a temporary residence while a permanent single-family dwelling is being constructed,subject to the following: i. Receipt of a temporary use permit from the Development Services Director, pursuant to section 5.04.04,that allows for use of a mobile home while a permanent single-family dwelling is being built; ii. Assurance that the temporary use permit for the mobile home will expire at the same time of the building permit for the single-family dwelling,or upon the completion of the single-family dwelling,whichever comes first; Ili. Proof that prior to the issuance of a final certificate of occupancy for the single- family dwelling,the mobile home is removed from the premises;and iv. The mobile home must be removed at the termination of the permitted period. 9. Use of a mobile home as a residence in conjunction with bona fide agricultural activities subject to the following: i. The applicant shall submit a completed application to the site development review director,or his designee,for approval of a temporary use permit to utilize a mobile home as a residence in conjunction with a bona fide commercial agricultural activity as described in subsection 2.03.01 A.1.2. Included with this application shall be a conceptual plot plan of the subject property depicting the location of the proposed mobile home;the distance of the proposed mobile home to all property lines and existing or proposed structures;and,the location, acreage breakdown, type and any intended phasing plan for the bona fide agricultural activity. ii. The receipt of any and all local,state,and federal permits required for the agricultural use and/or to place the mobile home on the subject site including, but not limited to,an agricultural clearing permit,building permit(s),ST permits,and the like. iii., The use of the mobile home shall be permitted on a temporary basis only, not to exceed the duration of the bona fide commercial agricultural activity for which the mobile home is an accessory use.The initial temporary use permit may be issued for a maximum of three years,and may, upon submission of a written request accompanied by the applicable fee,be renewed annually thereafter provided that there is continuing operation of the bona fide commercial agricultural activities. iv. The applicant utilizing,for the bona fide commercial agricultural activity,a tract of land a minimum of five acres in size.Any property lying within public road rights-of -way shall not be included in the minimum acreage calculations. v. A mobile home,for which a temporary use permit in conjunction with a bona fide commercial agricultural activity is requested,shall not be located closer than 100 feet from any county highway right-of-way line,200 feet from any state highway right-of-way,or 500 feet from any federal highway right-of-way line. 10. Packet Page-3308- http://library.runicode.com/print.asp x?client]=13992&HTMRequest=hLLp%3 a%2f%2fli... 1/27/2012 Mimicode 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of a residential development and have been designated, reviewed and approved on a site development plan or subdivision master plan for that development. Recreational facilities may include but are not limited to golf course, clubhouse,community center building and tennis facilities, parks,playgrounds and playfields. c. Conditional uses.The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the rural agricultural district(A),subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00 1. Extraction or earthmining,and related processing and production not incidental to the agricultural development of the property.NOTE:"Extraction related processing and production"is not related to"Oil extraction and related processing"as defined in this Code. 2. Sawmills. 3. Zoo,aquarium, aviary,botanical garden,or other similar uses. 4. Hunting cabins. 5. Aquaculture for nonnative or exotic species,subject to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission permits. 6. Wholesale reptile breeding or raising (venomous)subject to the following standards; i. Minimum 20 acre parcel size. ii. Any roofed structure used for the shelter and/or feeding of such reptiles shall be located at a minimum of 100 feet away from any lot line. • 7. Churches. 8. Private landing strips for general aviation,subject to any relevant state and federal regulations. 9. Cemeteries. 10. Schools,private. 11. Child care centers and adult day care centers. 12. Collection and transfer sites for resource recovery. 13. Communication towers above specified height,subject to section 5.05.09 14. Social and fraternal organizations. 15. Veterinary clinic. 16. Group care facilities(category I and II);care units;nursing homes;assisted living facilities pursuant to§400.402 F.S.and ch.58A-5 F.A.C.;and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to §651 F.S.and ch.4-193 F.A.C.,all subject to section 5.05.04 when located within the Urban Designated Area on the Future Land Use Map to the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 17. Golf courses and/or golf driving ranges. 18. •Oil and gas field development and production subject to state field development permits. 19. Sports instructional schools and camps. 20, Sporting and recreational camps. 21. Retail plant nurseries subject to the following conditions: i. Retail sales shall be limited primarily to the safe of plants,decorative products such as mulch or stone,fertilizers,pesticides, and other products and tools accessory to or required for the planting or maintenance of said plants. ii. Additionally,the sale of fresh produce is permissible at retail plant nurseries as an incidental use of the property as a retail plant nursery. iii. The sale of large power equipment such as lawn mowers,tractors, and the like shall not be permitted in association with a retail plant nursery in the rural agricultural district. 22. Asphaltic and concrete batch making plants subject to the following conditions: i. Asphaltic or concrete batch making plants may be permitted within the area designated agricultural on the future land use map of the future land use element of the growth management plan. ii. The minimum site area shall not be less than ten acres. iii. Principal access shall be from a street designated collector or higher classification. iv. Raw materials storage,plant location and general operations around the plant shall not be located or conducted within 100 feet of any exterior boundary. v. The height of raw material storage facilities shall not exceed a height of fifty(50) feet. vi. Hours of operation shall be limited to two (2) hours before sunrise to sunset. Packet Page-3309- o http://library.mu � J � nicode.cor/print.aspx?ciicuu —� � -111NRequest=http/03a0!o2f%2fli... 1/27/2012 Municode 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. vii. The minimum setback from the principal road frontage shall be 150 feet for operational facilities and seventy-five(75)feet for supporting administrative offices and associated parking. viii. An earthen berm achieving a vertical height of eight feet or equivalent vegetative screen with eighty(80)percent opacity one(1)year after issuance of certificate of occupancy shall be constructed or created around the entire perimeter of the property. ix. The plant should not be located within the Greenline Area of Concern for the Florida State Park System as established by the Department of Environmental Protection(DEP):within the Area of Critical State Concern as depicted on the Future Land Use Map GMP;within 1,000 feet of a natural reservation;or within any County, State or federal jurisdictional wetland area. 23. Cultural, ecological,or recreational facilities that provide opportunities for educational experience, eco-tourism or agri-tourism and their related modes of transporting participants,viewers or patrons where applicable,subject to all applicable federal,state and local permits.Tour operations,such as, but not limited to airboats,swamp buggies, horses and similar modes of transportation,shall be subject to the following criteria: i. Permits or letters of exemption from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,the Florida Department of Environmental Protection,and the South Florida Water Management District shall be presented to the planning services director prior to site development plan approval. • ii. The petitioner shall post the property along the entire property line with no trespassing signs approximately every 300 yards. iii. The petitioner shall utilize only trails identified and approved on the site development plan.Any existing trails shall be utilized before the establishment of new trails. iv. Motor vehicles shall be equipped with engines which include spark arrestors and mufflers designed to reduce noise. v. The maximum size of any vehicle,the number of vehicles, and the passenger capacity of any vehicle shall be determined by the board of zoning appeals during the conditional use process. vi. Motor vehicles shall be permitted to operate during daylight hours which means, one hour after sunrise to one hour before sunset. vii. Molestation of wildlife,including feeding,shall be prohibited. viii. Vehicles shall comply with state and United States Coast Guard regulations, if applicable. ix. The board of zoning appeals shall review such a conditional use for tour operations, annually. If during the review,at an advertised public hearing, it is determined by the board of zoning appeals that the tour operation is detrimental to the environment,and no adequate corrective action has been taken by the petitioner,the board of zoning appeals may rescind the conditional use. 24. Agricultural activities on parcels less than 20 acres in size: i. animal breeding,raising,training,stabling,or kenneling. ii. dairying; iii. livestock raising; iv. milk production; v. poultry and egg production;and vi. ranching. 25. The commercial production,raising or breeding of exotic animals,other than animals typically used for agricultural purposes or production,subject to the following standards: i. Minimum 20 acre parcel size. ii. Any roofed structure used for the shelter and/or feeding of such animals shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from any lot line. 26. Essential services,as set forth in subsection 2.01.03 G. 27. Model homes and model sales centers,subject to compliance with all other LDC requirements,to include but not limited to section 5.04.04 28. Ancillary plants. d. Prohibited uses. 1. Owning, maintaining or operating any facility or part thereof for the following purposes is prohibited: a) Fighting or baiting any animal by the owner of such facility or any other person or entity. Packet Page-3310- httn://library.municode.com/print.aspx?clientID-13992&HTM-Requ est=http%3 a%2f%2fli... 1/27/2012 Municode 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. b) Raising any animal or animals intended to be ultimately used or used for fighting or baiting purposes. c) For purposes of this subsection,the term baiting is defined as set forth in§828.122 (2)(a), F.S.,as it may be amended from time to time. • • • Packet Page-3311- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. max,. Packet Page-3312- • 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (Section 10.03.00,COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE(LDC) A zoning sign(s)must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on theparcel for a minimum of fifteen(15)calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s)must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs,however these guidelines should not be construed to supercede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements,please refer to Section 10.03.00 of the LDC. 1. The sign(S)must be erected in full view of the public,not more than five(5.)feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s)must be securely affixed by nails,staples,or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post,or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s)in place,and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a finial decision rendered. If the sign(s)is destroyed,lost, or rendered unreadable,the petitioner or the petitioner's agent mustreplace the signs NOTE; . AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST BEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY;PERSONALLY APPEARED Robert L. Duane, AICP WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT IIE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PZJDZ-PL-2011-0406 >r� uyit��•f, + �. Hole Montes, Inc. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O.BOX Robert L. Duane, AICP 950 Encore. Way, Naples, FL 34110 NAME(TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY,STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 2012 • The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 13TH day of JULY , 200 by Robert L. Duane., AICP ersonally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. ..._.. ., .�,_.,�_ �.._..._n._ _, ��- Signature of Notary Public .491:4%?,. STEPHANIE KA430L *: •* MY COMMISSION#EE163504 Stephanie Icarol ?•,a�� EXPIRES:With B,2016 k7ri ' Bonded ThaiNolaryPubhoUndetwillow Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) F:1Website\AFFIDAVITAND SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS 5-2-05.doc Packet Page -3313- \ i, R x K _.» r 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. e,. . ti .G• t'T 'gyp'. ,i y. , `< -a.. „ t Ah b t ;s„'h-' r 2 wr _ J {•. r t b•.•"r„' ,..s.'� "1;7.'4' '� s& w.,.. IA,-i ,..1',.'•:-..'.:*•r �i1&+''� < 'at j.: ��F S C.:t= -4"-.4,,,.1,,,,,.....;;;;7,,,A.,4,,.4,,,,-,,.._..,-,-++....d`"...�nr - _- '. -r� 3Y i . T '1r. ",;,,b.t ttvti r.1--'.w' _ _. y W.•2 r- - + r r��'�i' 3`" L- i<r $atS . '"F• vD r-C S 'sk " S `�T.::1 ''A '°" •14�to 2 `t s r F' 1 ,- FAN a ,:t7i,i� :4'.<, •1 '`J. '` .w . )a, T v s +,� t}t�'r �'+{ ✓ rnl � w r t ri•d' H ?r, ] f, � ,,�4.-..,- •1' CC . alt h� s t t'i -,,,.;r'' '5''' ':'-='.''.4-'+;+,...'' '.�c j,�ri§4 ,r ' •' ( -y` {tYritr - P.. ••' ;1(22 e1 t�Q T • -� l > r� i�}``1.. ' � ., { .('y�t'-" ��r,..k • '� ‘,,\F'. .~ 5 J' P P ",C t rt rV ZI \ ' r r a. - 1 d Q z'-'`c�,2--1"{'' s f :y C•�`',.s.a-(` .• ` °- ' +'. y R ; diP g®cc. ..! w ? < Y• .`,r'i 'C k�'i ¢ ("-''..- R C:7 �U, a.I--� _ • lit n �, f , ,..,` 1-. :'! rid 0.4,-...S-'‘4.: ,v y�))i YY4 kpl s-, z u.[h`'✓,.—0..CG p? l',:.+ t�r - f4s• �;N -. uef 7 - ��1."y S r :' 11.--- O Q',_ 0.5-'74 en A Q'Q �' end ,1--.:,-,...2.,b,-$,-,-:,..,:l � .,./.4,7__-77,--,-- ,,,,,+„P S-- :: y� �� fyl „1. B . t^W'{al r'y1 G.+.. , i`J's�� r•1 �4'! �i`i ,fi',.,,o.+4,a ; c'�++<�f rsr a d O' ft;t1.1.G9 ti .�,}}'T.'1 r r y � �`�, r�� .. ':r..-(:"]:- 1 A V U.u7 : i r k p T rYr k a'11 0 ` ] —--. a:Iwi ccr=f, - d ✓� ..yP,, . -.. �.,x _, r�,r.a°' 5 ,�,� \ -�° e' �,. YY,��.J:u.c�..¢r:.i C!-r - ! F4 'x a 'r .t \ 1 zn tt.- s 1l �- la"."'v cou:uJ, CG O „� a.✓ {h�i w -A C7 .g :,x 44 x. L � \ltl2�� ut a ��f �i Y.� -`' �p�r��adw� tS_�,9 .�" ;s�"W is .f�f��t,• ,, 1 `� v�.cn a ! "{9 6 r e 3 • 5.t../..1....tI~ e L o rn Q w W ec e3.�' I�JJ!c'g �� '' } ' . x ; r t .. - 1 =- d U,5 -GL. os. 11 C 1 �X1f' z,T '-'.:: ,,� '.1,...,-. ...a.ti f i `��+� 0 G1 fGf Q'w ..(f � �� F _ �?may t , X a . fS;,} :� !:1•ti:. -w n ,tea „ .,. z s Vi to �. 's'K`r \,• J rC L7 GT C'3..1 W'UJ 'a�. ' • ur q,. , �"' �' } -3 w!' a.l_ w N'f 'u 11 <tr+° ca a �. yfWf s pu3ia �I 1 t- ao0.ww:awu, - rtFi- 1 bb y x - ( s �� LriI a.v.(� ud°t-mo1� _ ((a -- 1 r ✓ ';c�,•- ?'� 1 ]-..O Ci .fn Cr'"R G w�4 e� q`(. °"'"� 'i'`'! k! �'�°i s ,. ."1":-11;4115k41 '' w ca r 1, ",• —S � r C U- -a a Ya-.c ,a rte'� ¢ �, o :01'4.. 7, .- ti x �c i ( t 0u.'=1 0,oat 1�= �° ( ?�,i1 iY~3'c'; 4 t i .,k�� 1 1 '-,rte.c. �C? c�p�O- � Q�_✓.� (=��L� ;r� r : t a2�i' dk. a J.. - t '. �! .w N�<c<<c)c::Vr L� } 't 9 LAA - i}s. f c .F rf 1 �..� 0 T d' 0 O 2, r��. k�_��<<pp 3i 4 7 T t�,",k T-,..-r.' rI ;1 s A', Ki `y 1) r^ T "". --'Lriak tr.5 G.' it`' E..: �� •.. Sw n,y 'y .. ' `v ?!. �T'•�vt.++,:,,,'j, 4!t r fy 1 L,- Cal]--'—m'c I7-1 - <C• 0.-1,_, ...S.-,a-q'`'--f•-2,,p,. .:;',.,•:, �`. I' „ ''.�C,.�.1i.<.�.cf<�b ` " tc.=-"1 0 c7 0 r�,ua„..1 '�".' �. t1 4"Cs. 7 1-, -? i/...rA Ca .-y .. -- r�t '1].: .C't}� 0`V.'V h v O(1. 1(— u"�'t s " n -c.a --.. ;' .fir, ��`�.f ...�i,, � . ,x'y„-ti rs >- o R-a L cC:0 rte' ° „*s �` ' .:„” S h ccrA�# `S it j� r4 Ct2 1L- 4=— F'-=rC a" .a = ..i a z.7pT:i,, ir fi Ls b r t C y__' (:, .• bu sa ' ra Ll f.1g '�, „4 X, a LS e :e=-lu ua'O C'JO e:�w !-'-(.u'' [�. '� Y,•_ 4��'{� `�i ��,_tr�x rte - l-d ta- 0-.f�L�u�p'C _ `V _ C—` '`�..1,� ter a° " } - 4 4'Yr F---77,-- �("'^C!]� ,7_ I. : C' � ( 4: �'�xnu x � c4� �' L— te7 1E4, u.a�a 6' id C-0 e Ro_11 h S 1 ° S a W r < r� 1 A Y —,:, � u cn Y.u.ir,3 en (72' a a-i's tf .. ' 1. Q. 6 i J-t ` . r� , rwK w r.'_-,.(�Ca.<a �- 12 v \ y sl' .T', r �`rs2" }� a cn�w cC �st4 � . i,- ` �` a: 4v N. 'w 4; 'S� s aSr :.i_I .,11 u.c3.2 I"J' �.Q- .. C-=- 1'43 ?4. ;,: Ss`ti v-' f ., •rrrrr 1 17 f '� :, O .-.0 L"].'d tr,el'[r7.�,,, 0 ', '_ _ ^ r, =, 0 t �' k l' s .�tt" \ g .;._� / /,�.+�. '` Via- .•2.,+. W. �Yy E Syy aft,. t..'O—[�. W�.G < ^�.-rT. `O.sa 3' ', C Y''� <aer' F � .� �a �k^o:°moo ,: Jr9 ��' :G � 1 1"^.!, � ' ,.3. N,. 'may a y wit .. 44 _ �,y,.n� �¢.� ".��a t—ca � g---.. �"4RS�,:.� �.• r, 1 4., rLd 1�.- r.'YS .-1. � •E e'-'"�° u'' ' (u�!.<1'-'u_ ('J'�'.0 A. `{; ..1.a 7,11 l5''pa -, l.y` Si - e =`�`a., , 54- . pi? wu >•a. I_: i1 . ,- `� ,i l ,, l i:4-. dyer ` i f �' .x r o '�" ry w tw-c 1 .u 9: � y-4`Zwz s : :-A. ti. '> g�,-te C .G CC: • r t r; . a .� IC cu k t- c'' ,1„,:,,),,,,,rk r 5,," ;5 fL O.Cr= v c•C O C7 .. .,T ''�a 1 y."y '+ s ,,L*`-., ' -t �r TS .#. •i.,5,1 •-c x xr., ,1 '{` {raja 3y - 11 ' �qw ' i 1 -.„,,,jr,,g p. .P .�t,..,.- +x'��,^� .41 . .' '"3 g t.1. E' �•al 'a Z�c \ 4 ,,.:.,.> � y »�. -f;. 1 A .is k.a a..�.a .�” * . '�. s 3 � i' r ��»A ',.:,''',..13"... a�A7 c f Packet Page-3314- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. S31dVN 0 IN3VId013A30 1V1114301538 -------- - ILIS2235gtiSIX3 i to ,and. 3AkeSadd 000/ANAL-El _ 0 30IdSOH ,,F,... .:t 1 .t. : ,.. 3A.1=13S3Eld. , . , ,,, , . . . . . .•.• . 0 :i., ,.., 1 8 '' 110111■31111%, ■101■••■■•■Via.■■■■■■ ;\v .,,z ,■\ lelb■ 1 , I 2,, 9 ';', z 1 ...,'...•••••••. . . •.' .... , i :4' ' - ii `` .. • ,,. . . .‘ I itl ',:li,,,o 11 ±- V. h .'• , • . .6 • • •—.43 • . 1 -.8 I il 0 Ol t "gf---'6 4 ..J a a g ii z ,,:'2LIS ce i I- t • .= I— , . , • , . , , . • • , 1 , N•:■Itt&'1111111.\ VI. 6... ,4., 1 t _. •11 . . . . . .. . , , Lcs. _F- Is,,ea ■ (.------------ — 1 N g co • DE`g „Ium 1g , :: '. , IMOD-. ti .,1"- ,,• ,, 0t11,7, z O F 1 9 p •111 , E z 1 .7f\ ■ $. 5 <8° p 0-1- r I 6"'"' ' . o)bc i .Vg■-•!,,r3 :T 1 , CD CO 0 ne, 2 6 • • ,'.' I .1... 4., th. .„ 2•• ' . ■ • ■Dilffiin° , - --- -."; ------- Niiii - 0g .1 -'4:ic- . 5`s ■ . ' '=';' u-. % .,-.,..L.-0 . ....8-4,.., . •■.■ NIN„,‘,. ---.. ..,,- .,-Nti:L1 , , La E 1 z ERA ' p E.,.. , , . " . . N.1/4"4111■■•■■•■•■ •misa. 1 'i ( Rf,,,'i4 ■• ,' ',• .• .. .• -. .-.', . . . . . . , : 1 1 ,i 4r.. ....,.,',' ' '. . ..•. .......•••••••• , , , 1 1 •Ihisi -Es5 2E )g, 0 i I ;1 1 § Im '',2 8 . , . / 0 6 . 6' 1 L ' ' • , IN, ,Ivelit,, ,`•-3 t.p.-.1 , :.' k ILI , . v , , I 1 . I mei ., ,.•i Z,i< .f?,, log ,,_ : N w• . , • • . . ,=,-,== ,=, °P." 25PP, 'It liSt, 11 '' ." • ' 10 zbi.. 6WP, ' 14g. .'q9;f2 Q9i; I I- •:•E ,... 1-- L- * t=-, #: . . .•. --- i z L.L., _ c.) 0- U.., ., ,, ,- , 0•Iliti - gR'-'( \qw. loon -- , 0 ..7 0.- 1.6 . e 11--`i f . , ,- ui z g - ? , _loo i 8-0 ' • ' .i 1 < Z g-h, , ce ° • 5 ,3, 6°66 18'18 1°., 143L,;,.2 g '6:'21 2 ; .,- / zos atS 1 I k4'°' ' / CC P. E.i ,t I; ri." _I_L s g ',5'-5'aarl __,-------- IN 10 te, R ' 1 ,/ gg 1 , e 8 p ------- - —I— — — — — — -- IL 1 8 g - Mill __ , ; ,‘ ) Illg.i _ - _ _ , ------------------------------_ __,) _ ------__ i __ gi OVOEI aoaa 3NId - - --,---... <434.144E -------------- - '--- -------11-111------ir - -, Packet Page -3315- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. AINkt Packet Page-3316- �a.... _ 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. aim °I M I 1° 0 U' 1 9 i e a ® w Q Z 7e g W H $ °m 1 N _5 (n I-- LL x K Y`r-'d^ w ¢ 0 Ocl = -J O Q <^N x < 4 O Z W W om cc UW OO .W' OKmw M Q W Oa" W O J O l y j a ¢F- fCC 0 O Z Q z U. to I- 0- U ce E- W Q Z CC W Q W d o Q U(n O W J a 0 ILI m rZ J M cc 0 QO O J < aU Q¢ Z < w z M- OG cn U)W 6 O0M--CC P < 10 u0 H- I < Q0Z Q LLI 2� • CC d' J WQ a' H� (nCF- r (n(fQ W aQ W6O W O Z Zw O WW a I-?.� U Cr) NOJOO OOOZw rowz W� N W Q O W W O p W J J Z Q m Z =U Q a ¢ o UJ a N(/)L 0 II U¢� ¢- �( * 0 J< cn I WwOU 0 X u_z0O zW W o~. O Oozpmr Z} 300 W o°o�CC ° Mwr� w z x w OU =x o LO CC(Q p I.``°OL' w } M �- -z0 � Q Qow � �U 0 vl CO IJi NJ_u-JCC r X 5<-0 UZ Q 11�-I 11 1 - Q �?Qr ZO f � O Q in co OW D M -.W Q J N 0 V Q U Q z m O CC 5 z F- pr (n 0~OQ K0Q Q Q Q. Q rw- Q h-r Q Q U II CC vO -p W • ¢ QQLa I-0 II ornOO 1- = oom a 00- c� �o°aNL: Uwj >'>1- a rioo* Q z ww Jm a W NO F- O Oa' L'-I O F-. QWm� }W -I O�Zg �a zm mW Zwa r) II II II II at ¢ mJ Q CC• W ¢ �N=goi � Q ¢�pw x W Z wOr¢ ¢V)o� °� a O r- r W O O Wa' r w u) r = wQQ y,--; 3 9 -°wa }z a. 1- t0--a. Da OW, V 0 W -}j �Z� Li=o w qu€Cc J XOmMmo WO Oz`I-0 a c Io(now Z nVA W F.. Q ENO OF d Z Z 0-1 U-0 d' Q N O. ¢Q rW I oOQ °zV.� LLi w Z oCCQOO I- UQ 0O O< WWw W w Z (o0 o0Q=a¢p ate§CC(I) .s z < '-Z .. 0 0 Z (n (n W CO 0 = < M W 0 I-s- 0 O U' 0] a W N a' JXm Jar < O I.. nr) zpJQ K0OQ J W (� J O o Q ..DQZO w°° o> WZa Q� o m oo> z oo aao(3F-F-i aL J U (7)>- N co = O �O .. (=n �� Z •L. W W UXQ mOJO W J W V)O W W J Z a U J U OW Z W W a'm (n o W O O m O J W Z D O> J V) O W W QI- K W O 5(n W¢ Q 5 5 w J EC a Q m- ig W t-- :E c'= oHOa-- 0 �' wo��¢w W �� o , E - I... 0 I- UZZoU (n= 0 § =§Z atir Q Kad_J CC > CC CL Z.- (V M 0 YI W 1 w wIlo O i CD LLI _z a a a a aUZ 30 0 4 D W In M Z W _J> o 6i C.Lgi L6 J Wu=J�uep° —.------- o/ z J W (+-(wn.J --- 113 "' CC• w — °-> oar U ° 5 ti Y 1— ww W aU W W K a 0 � < I 11) oo ✓ o IJ z <H o w cn Z. }a 0 m (n lY F- rQ >az z J m W Z O 0 (n a lIi. w y > C'1(n W Fw- N (n Z W W U r. 3i - . 000 < J l.L r io.- 7m > W 1--: O PI z 0 m 0 z rep J z 0 s U Q •$ « w 1 a Q M. Z Q i ? z a 3 <o Q W 0 CO le M c21-W WO ------- ,0-.1 H< ( z() I— (f 0 M z 0( .n g a v' 3 0 0 ig m z `n P Zit aw : NoW gg 0 f?F :PI S p Packet Page -3317- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Packet Page-3318- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. ORDINANCE NO. 12- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT WITH AN "ST" OVERLAY TO A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 145,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL AND OFFICE USES WHICH INCLUDE A MAXIMUM OF 25,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL AND A MAXIMUM OF 60,000 SQUARE FEET OF MEDICAL OFFICE USES. ALSO PERMITTED ARE HOTEL AND MOTEL USES AT 20 UNITS PER ACRE AND GROUP HOUSING (ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AND INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS) AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF .60. FOR EACH ACRE OF GROUP HOUSING OR HOTEL OR MOTEL USE, 12,083 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL OR OFFICE USE SHALL BE SUBTRACTED FROM THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF ALLOWABLE COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PINE RIDGE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 980 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 13.65+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Robert Duane, AICP, of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. representing First Community Bank of Southwest Florida, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,that: Brynwood Center CPUD/ Page lof 3 PUDZ-PL2011-406 Rev.08/06/12 Packet Page -3319- , 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. SECTION ONE: oitow The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 18, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from an Agricultural (A) Zoning District with an ST Overlay to a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as the Brynwood Center CPUD to allow construction of a maximum of 145,000 square feet of retail and office uses which include a maximum of 25,000 square feet of retail and a maximum of 60,000 square feet of medical office uses. Also permitted are hotel and motel uses at 20 units per acre and group housing(assisted living facility, and independent living units) at a floor area ratio of.60. For each acre of group housing or hotel or motel use, 12,083 square feet of retail or office use shall be subtracted from the total amount of allowable commercial square footage in accordance with Exhibits "A" through "F", attached hereto and incorporated herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Afew PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this day of ,2012. A'rt'EST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E.BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk FRED W. COYLE, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Alitk Brynwood Center CPUD/ Page 2of 3 PUDZ-PL2011-406 Rev.08/06/12 Packet Page-3320- i f 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Attachments: Exhibit A—List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B—Development Standards Exhibit C-1A—Master Plan Exhibit C-1 B—Master Plan Exhibit C-2—Enhanced Type`B"Landscape Buffer&Preserve Exhibit D—Legal Description Exhibit E—List of Requested Deviations Exhibit F—List of Developer Commitments CP\11-CPS-01111\87 Brynwood Center CPUD/ Page 3of 3 PUDZ-PL2011-406 Rev.08/06/12 Packet Page-3321- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT A LIST OF PERMITTED USES BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD I. PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof shall be erected, altered or used, or land used,in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Commercial Uses 1. Accounting,Auditing and Bookkeeping Services (8721) 2. Apparel and Accessory Stores (5611)1 3. Architectural Services (8712) 4. Automobile and Home Supply Stores (5531)1 5. Automobile Service and repair shops general (7538)2 6. Banks, commercial:national (6021) 7., Banks, commercial: state (6022) 8. Banks,commercial:Not Federally Chartered (6029) 9. Banks,savings:Federal (6035) 10. Banks, savings:Not Federally Chartered (6036) 11. Barber Shops (7241)1 12. Beauty Shops (7231)1 13. Book Stores (5942)1 14. Business Consulting Services-not elsewhere classified (8748) 15. Camera Stores (5946)1 16. Carpet and Upholstery Cleaning (7217)1 17. Candy,Nut and Confectionery Stores (5441)1 18. Children's and Infants' Wear Stores (5641)1 19. Chiropractors Offices&Clinics (8041) 20. Commercial Economic, Sociological and Educational Research (8732) 21. Commercial Physical and Biological Research (8731) 22. Computer and Computer Software Stores (5734)1 23. Credit Unions,Federally Chartered (6061) 24. Credit Unions, State:Not Federally Chartered (6062) 25. Dairy Products Stores (5451) 26. Dental Laboratories (8072) 27. Dentist Offices&Clinics (8021) 28. Department Stores (5311)1 29. Doctors-Medicine Offices&Clinics (8011) 30. Doctors-Osteopathy Offices&Clinics (8031) 31. Doctors-Chiropractors Offices&Clinics (8041) 32. Drapery, Curtain and Upholstery Stores (5714)1 Page 1of16 H:\2006\20060631WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\Post CCPC\Brynwood Center PUDZ-P1r2011.0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).doe Packet Page-3322- I 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 33. Drug Stores and Propriety Stores (5912)1 34. Eating Places (5812) 35. Engineering Services (8711) 36. Facilities Support Management Services (8744)1 37. Family Clothing Stores (5651) 38. Floor Covering Stores (5713)1 39. Florists (5992)1 40. Fruit and Vegetable Markets (5431) 41. Funeral Service only(excluding Crematories) (7261)1 42. Furniture Stores (5712)1 43. Garment Pressing and Agents for Laundries and Drycleaners (7212)' 44. Gasoline Stations (5541)4 45. General Medical and Surgical Hospitals (8062) 46. General Merchandise Stores(groups) (5311)1 47. Grocery Stores (5411)1 48. Hardware Store (5251)1 1 49. Health and Allied Services-not elsewhere classified (8099) 09 ere classified 8 4 ewh ) 50. Health practitioners Offices&Clinics -not elsewhere ( 1 51. Home Furniture,Furnishing and Equipment Stores (5712) 52. Home health care services (8082) 53. Hotels and Motels (7011) 54. Household Appliance Stores (5722)1 55. Insurance Agents,Brokers and Service (6411) 56. Kidney Dialysis Centers (8092) 57. Legal Services (8111) 58. Management Consulting Services (8742) 59. Management Services (8741) 60. Meat and Fish(Seafood)Markets,including Freezer Provisioners (5421)1 61, Medical Laboratories (8071) 62. Men's and Boy's Clothing and Accessory Stores (5611)1 63. Miscellaneous Apparel and Accessory Stores (5699)1 64. , Miscellaneous Food Stores (5499)1 65. Miscellaneous General Merchandise Stores (5399)1 i 66. Miscellaneous Homefurnishings Stores (5719)1 67. Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified excluding (7299) ; massage parlors, steam baths,tattoo parlors and Turkish baths 68. Miscellaneous Retail Stores -not elsewhere classified (5999)1 69. Musical Instrument Stores (5736)1 70. Noncommercial Research Organizations (8733) • 71. Nursing and Personal Care Facilities-not elsewhere classified (8059) 72. Optical Goods Stores (5995)1 73. Optometrists-Offices&Clinics (8042) 74. Paint,Glass&Wallpaper Stores (5231)1 75. Photographic Studios,Portrait (7221) 76. Physical Fitness Facilities (7991) 77. Podiatrists-Offices&Clinics (8043) Page2of16 H:1200612006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\Post CCPC\Btynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).doc Packet Page -3323- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 78. Public Relations Services (8743) 79. Radio,Television and Consumer Electronics Stores (5731)1 80. Real Estate Agents and Managers (6531) 81. Record and Prerecorded Tape Stores (adult video rental or sales (5735)1 • prohibited) 82. Retail Bakeries (5461)1 83. Retail Nurseries,Lawn&Garden Supply Stores (5261)1 84. Shoe Repair Shops and Shoeshine Parlors (7251)1 85. Shoe Stores (5661)1 86.. Specialty Hospitals, except psychiatric (8069) 87. Specialty Outpatient Facilities—not elsewhere classified (8069) 88. Sporting Goods Stores and Bicycle Shops (5941)1 89. Surveying Services (8713) 90. Tax Return Preparation Services (7291) 91. Testing Laboratories (8734) 92. Travel Agencies (4724) 93. Used Furniture Stores (5932)1 94. Variety Stores (5331)1 95. Veterinary Services for Animal Specialties with no outdoor kenneling (0742)1 96. Video Tape Rental,(adult video rental or sales prohibited) (7841)1 97. Women's Accessory and Specialty Stores (5632)1 98. Women's Clothing Stores (5621)1 Footnotes: 1 Prohibited within 400 feet of the south property line. 2 Prohibited within 600 feet of the south property line (see also Exhibit B, Section s Prohibited within 400 feet of the south property line except as an accessory use to a hotel/motel (see also Exhibit B, Section V). No outdoor music, television or open windows shall be permitted other than for a pass-through for food service. • 4 Allowed only on Pine Ridge Road frontage(see also Exhibit B,Section IV). B. Preserve areas. C. Any other commercial or professional use comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent of the district determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals,pursuant to the LDC. IL PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES FOR GROUP HOUSING/RETIREMENT COMMUNITY USES THROUGHOUT THIS CPUD A. Group Housing 8051, Skilled Nursing, Intermediate Care Facilities 8052,Nursing and Personal Care not else classified 8059. B. Independent living units. Page 3of16 HA2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\Post CCPCCBrynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(0'4-07.2012).doc Packet Page -3324- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. C. Assisted living units. D. Retirement community. E. See also Section 5.05.04.D, Group Housing of the LDC for use of terms including independent living units, assisted living units and retirement community, and standards for these housing types III. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES A. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the permitted uses of the CPUD document. B. Eating places (Group 5812), only in conjunction with hotel/motel use if located within 400 feet of the south property line. C. Drinking places (Group 5813), only in conjunction with eating places or hotel/motel use. D. Exterior speakers for drive-through facilities such as a bank or fast food restaurant only outside the 400-foot setback area from the south property line. E. Signs as permitted in the LDC. F. Stormwater Management Areas. G. Swimming pools and recreational facilities such as tennis courts for hotel/motel guests. H. Parking(7521) except tow-in parking lots. I. Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals,pursuant to the LDC. Page 4 of 16 H.\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\Post CCPC\Brynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).doe Packet Page-3325- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD The table below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Brynwood Center CPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. I. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR CPUD DISTRICT PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 sq.ft. N/A AVERAGE LOT WIDTH 100 ft. N/A MINIMUM YARDS(External) From Pine Ridge Road ROW 25 ft. SPS From Eastern Project Boundary 25 ft.' 15 ft. From Western Project Boundary 25 ft. 15 ft From Southern Project Boundary 2 90 ft.(two stories) 25 ft. 120 ft.(three stories) MINIMUM YARDS(Internal) Internal Drives(from edge of driveway pavement) 15 ft. 10 ft. From Internal Tract Boundaries 15 ft. 10 ft. oak Lakes 20 ft.3 20 ft.3 Preserves 25 ft. 10 ft. MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS '4 the sum of zoned building 10 ft. heights MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONED ACTUAL (Either with or without3arking in these structures) Retail Buildings(two stories) 35 ft. 45 ft. 25 ft. Office Buildings(three stories) 40 ft. 50 ft. 35 ft. Hotel and Motel(three stories) 40 ft. 50 ft. 35 ft. Hotel and Motel(four stories)4 50 ft. 60 ft. 35 ft. Group Housing(three stories) 40 ft. 50 ft. 35 ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 sq.ft. N/A SPS=same as principal use setback. Footnotes: 1 No setback is required from the east property line provided a unified plan is approved with the Pine Ridge West PUD. 2 No sound speaker systems within 400 feet of the south property line. The only sound speaker systems permitted are for drive-through windows for banks or fast food restaurants. Some uses listed in Exhibit A are subject to additional setback restrictions from the south property line. 3 Measured from lake control elevation. 4 Not permitted within 400 feet from the south property line. Page 5of16 H,\2006\20060631WP\Rezone&Rezone 2011\Post CCPC\Brynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).don Packet Page-3326- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. II. DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR GROUP HOUSING/RETIREMENT, COMMUNITY Group housing/retirement community uses described in Exhibit A, Section II shall provide the following services and/or be subject to the following operational standards: A. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older. B. There shall be on-site dining for the residents. C. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services may be provided for the residents' individualized needs including but not limited to medical office visits. D. There shall be an on-site manager/activities coordinator to assist residents with their individual needs. The manager/coordinator shall also be responsible for arranging trips to off-site events as well as planning for lectures, movies, music and other entertainment for the residents at the on-site clubhouse. E. A wellness center shall be provided on-site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall be provided for the residents. F. Each unit shall be equipped to notify emergency service providers in the event of medical or other emergency. G. Each unit shall be designed to accommodate residents with physical impairments (handicaps) as required by the applicable building codes and federal law and regulation. III. HOURS OF OPERATION There shall be no loading or unloading within 400 feet from the south property line before 7:00 a.m.or after 6:00 p.m.Monday through Saturday for any permitted use. IV. MISCELLANEOUS USE RESTRICTIONS, A. Certain uses are prohibited within 400 feet of the south property line as provided in Exhibit A, Section I. B. Automobile service and repair shops and similar types of permitted uses such as tire dealers shall conduct all activities within enclosed structures. Bay doors may not be oriented to the south. These uses are not permitted less than 600 feet from the south property line. C. Gas Stations shall be limited to frontage on Pine Ridge Road only. Page 6 of 16 H:12006120060631WP\RezonetReaone 2011\Post CCPCCBrynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).doc Packet Page -3327- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. V. EATING PLACES AND DRINKING PLACES AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO A HOTEL/MOTEL Eating and drinking places are allowed in conjunction with a hotel/motel within 400 feet to the south property line and shall be subject to the following requirements: A. They shall be accessory uses to a hotel or motel with no sign identification. B. They shall be located in the northern portion of the building. C. No outdoor music,televisions or open windows other than a pass-through window for food service shall be permitted. D. They shall be limited to serving only hotel patrons with room keys and their guests. E. The drinking place shall be limited to a maximum of 25 seats. VI. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITIES A. Commercial Area 1. Intensity: A maximum of 145,000 SF of gross floor area which includes up to 25,000 SF of retail; 60,000 SF or more of general office; and no Amok more than 60,000 SF of medical office. 2. Conversion: The maximum allowable gross floor area of 145,000 SF shall be reduced by 12,083 SF for each gross acre of hotel/motel or group housing or fraction thereof. B. Group Housing/Retirement Community Uses With conversion noted in VI, A.2 above, a maximum 0.60 floor area ratio (FAR.). C. Hotel/Motel With conversion noted in VI,A.2 above, a maximum of 20 units per acre. D. Acreage of preserve areas and lake area in excess of 1.65 acres shall be included in the calculation of densities and F.A.R.'s. (The first 1.65 acres of preserve area shall not be counted because it is required to reduce the project area to 12 acres to meet the infill criteria). E. The use of retail/office, group housing or hotel/motel and the acreages for each use shall be assigned at site development plan approval. The conversion from Page 7of16 H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\Post CCPC1Brynwood Center PUDZ-P1r2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).doc Packet Page-3328- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. retail and office floor area to hotel/motel or group housing acreage shall include common or accessory use areas such as lakes,preserves and access drives, which may be included in the site area as described in the site development plan for density purposes(whether platted or not). VII. ENHANCED LANDSCAPE BUFFER(SOUTH PROPERTY LINE), Exhibit C-2 is attached and depicts an enhanced landscape buffer and preserve area along the south property line. Within this buffer area are 14 to 18-foot trees spaced no more than 20 feet on centers. These trees shall be staggered in heights and on centers with a 6- foot high wall provided as depicted on Exhibits C-1A and C-2. Page 8 of 16 1-1:12006120060631WP\Re one\Rezone 2011\Post CCPC\Brynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).doc Packet Page -3329- I Ca ad VC Od 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 301e1SON ,..,.,..... ::-.'; ,:.'...Andi2.WtEEIS3kid.000tAfak-C: '',.,,.. •-• i ---:::—'---7-'—'":.."'•I .t'..''.‘'...........:::*iia'iliteitiiii.' ..';....,,!......':'....,%.',.. \ litp x \ 'N., ,...., ii7, .x:I.v a 1 ea I.,•■■Imo biew Nam la...m a NI a a a i 1■■-•I P-1 Ilik-N1•■••■II•.-4. .•,•.1.•/..':...''.:! :•.'.''''‘.''':.-':;-: 1 .. . •0• ■ '6 A g 4i.".. ? .f.:.:.'..:' :AS" • ° ''. .q\,1• ,.,.' ..'. ■.• O. ..M. ..•....V..'O..'0•'.., 1::s'....:..: 2 . . 1g , :..,:...,;.,.:" 1 0 :::.....t',•,. .,/.1 i 1 ' is .. 1 ,....•%*.•':'...•.7,..•... .. . -.'.. ..,... . .1.--...: 5 1 1 R • L.:,..,..,..., .0 -- ../:IL.A Ell 4: i . 3 .. .• ; .• . . ••• • .. ..... .. 4 • ...... .. .• .. ...t......,;• 1 •,;. ,...:,v • it . iwg .., ,..:,,,.....,..:... ,... .... . A . •.... ■ s'' :".•':. AR 1...1 1.1 k ..,.,.. ..........,.. ..:...,........ vo....,....,1*..i:_.:?". za • ,,li . 1 _ - ..:. . ... ...• ........ !..... ... ..; ..„,:.......: 15 4.4,•;::,. .....;. ;. .,:.....„,.... .,...:,...; :.,..., ..,.... i_ z lei 4 .... Ni •...,....AO I I, . ••.• cc :E. g % , - . •• A i E F .. § 1 i!..!•,:%';!.•;*.-.,••••:•••..!;:-.•. -:•:.:', . CO . •' . • ' • 0 Ci 4 • 111 \ - • • .• .. •• • .• .. • t 2 • ' ' '' . .. - . o. N. •-■16,x,qhmibx, . .!-.-•-•.:: - . • - : I s = • . , - . - .: •F; . ..'..'...?..*:„':•.-- 2 n. k 1 i ". . '. - 1 '. : • 5 ,_ 0 \'''.7...'.:..:•'.. ad! 0 at . ,,,,‘,„ ,.... „...... . . ,_1 •. i... .., i. .„-g...,. .. ■.. ,',.!..:.. ails I i; gV .. ....._. . . .,. i 10 , • ...... : .:‘:-...?.... -. . 1. . ,0t-ttioalogiatiliok. ,, . . . ! :, ,p. ... ,:,:0,,,:.. p 1 I2 163 . •'•• •,. • , - ! 1 t," . ,••..• . 1;.....e,....i: . • VI . •,..9 „. < ci. ',,,01,14:,10,, Imi. •• 1 ii . i 1111111•,,,1 .' aL iiii .....',,......:.".,...,... .;.... ...7.................Aw„ i i ( •' , .." •,., ....,.,.:,-,.......,..-:,......- .....• 1 i:4910. geeal ..:.!••••,;•.•...-...?,....••••,..-..-Y...-:.;-...,-.--........,.%'..t.... , 4 . 1 1 II :E. al ..,,k, . , .• .. ..,.. •• $ . . ... .• . .. ., , , , • , , 1 I 41.21k . ..• • •••' . . . - • p i I II I. ..,, E Rg 1 L . ........,,.... .. -. . • • , - . -. • . • .. • . • / , 9.1i1 0 •••••:., , • .. - - •- ' / •;-.-!•;•••••••.. . - • • - . - ., , - . . .... :.,.. ..• . , . .. - • - .. • . . . . ,..,/,, / ,, xi I . .4, . ...... ........ ., . . . . • . • • . • .„, - , • • ..,, , , , • • . - - - .. $ $ $ I AA os• :„6 itrA _ . - - iv . " • - - ' - . ' - . 11 el ig i ' [ aN iga 14m -IR Alt 0. ee i • IQ , SI, w - cro gi 4.....,.-.,..;‘,...:-.,.......:. . -.. - -, .:,• -. .• -.‘•%-,• . ,,?r::i.....-i!.....s.:...,y. .. -.14 ti az i - 4:::;.....t,:,:',..,:•:,.• -..... ._%:. -.... *:. " .:,/':::i.: !.:.:7:::::' !I h _ R l 't 1 8 - 21 i r . ,„. , 1 .■. ......... - - • - - - -,--,:,' , - gts,- 1 i 0 ' - *, - . "/':,•,' ti)z 5 0 . !pa ; :4 4 - • ,•,:), ill ! 5 : 1 '8.0 -- . ... 3 , § 1 <4 4; 11 a- 0 0 1 . .. ' // i Ce CO ffl' egg tz' ..-°' z 1 ., " , :47; .NE IN: .2 F 8g2 ; .- 7-,/ w h" §pRg . 1 1 III : /...- .- P a 1 i z , , IIAI:il in gi :. •,--, 1 1 - , 1, , , - 11111 51.. ,....„ ...... . . ---------- ; \ ---------------- ------_-----__.----- - ....... I 1- -------------- ----- _; „, L__,./ I I. - I 1111 1 W011 3E4311 31Id ----__--- 4 ---- --------------------------_.....A........................... "...MY.1 P.M.4.II.GM 171-W41111/110.0 Si...1.0.111•31.•51.MIA01.1110.001‘. Packet Page -3330- 1 J 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. m N B =aZW � � 06 1 p=ici S o m °� riO C2 . O wp FZW ffi wxm U ° V ab g 8 04 Z 6g 5zd Eby F = e 8 ZO 2Q8 d YFg 1-§6p; A R. 8z 28 ts° v KJZ o 6!�°d o 61;1 N 6 uj E F taJ Q p, T�� U 4. -0 EL m o yw w a +I ,pp 0 1 groK El; * §§ O0 a 0 Ii.. a5 z ` <ZO Z S� �` m w °zd orc�° 11 z wwy`6` < p (� O ° � ox 2S�J+m Q F F?my G�. F. udda pl — ....,zo . r o oo .60 z 2 1182. x o<0z 1 o°oo ' Zs 62ZUFz o $ < °� �° NZ , .. .-rn.-, N aUcE I u v.,i o'� a oW Lag ,� r�ioo.r Q l� 2 ° Q ¢ 'S V zi . 5M2R r° U u 0 0 'I a 0w��rz �� ir Ii < `$o 2< a < jFWg g<°<%ff I x w z �°° a7a r ig �j m w U F� d J -141-1 mm5R15 ozi a • z a) i "agiLm , z zUUO� a0rrmww ,,�, dQ F a°� p w� • Z�wv� tD roo ro` 37dcri z < �F=4 o��w- mgI <'� O g I�ri z y�sm U N2 U' p �� Z 8 ..B ..803,,,SZ o aoOw-{ zae� > �n� z i1' Iti z w Ow gO r fin' F w Wn cri W . . ii w U e °da °ra, 0 t y ti S N• a a e i z >�' ..X L °a vs O 0 v 11 l Dm - UZ em CO U -- z 15 /LI ' �' Q Q "? ti Q. w P to �-'z ao 0 0 m 1 g 2U Q - d oaa N< a z lt; Jg II �rU, re I i! P 0 X11111 taI Page 10 of 16 H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\Post CCPC\Brynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).doc Packet Page -3331- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. g N MIN eV g ib 3 P.i i to 1 G 11 1 to 3110; 1 8 1 \---' t w 1 , ,d i ..! 8 10 B to ..ice\i W 7 W" Ws i ga --41117 illriiir cc, 15 q lk k.:-'--■- — Lu N° -rte - a a. 11 e is L,...........„„L „ t ,t _.,-,.. ....._ ,,,,... .. CD i I �i z P - -L ,iA►�t t- � w !ill °ul w t , t� Ll.�t , tu Amp Li ' m w ;, '.+ ` ^ r a.= r , W Ix Q!o = :..0%/11110 41 ZZ rnlw ,6=4 s.4,' W' �'!II - cc 0 00 CO c.,.� 0' 4311 1 °C cc Z� o$ ti Q c b m i52 =I P G i v i liat,.oy t� to dtim a 61 0• m e $WZ P ° O . . • i_ ill• 29 I cc °-m 1 "1 ./Y.w..w.Y ff...IOD..rr......FIFf...............,... Page 11 of 16 H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone1Rezone 2011\Post CCPC\Brynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).doc Packet Page -3332- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. . I EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS PARCEL 116 AS DESCRIBED IN THE LIS PENDES RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 2631, PAGE 188 AND ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 2660, PAGE 3364 AND LESS PARCEL 115 AS DESCRIBED IN THE LIS PENDES RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 944, PAGE 494 AND THE STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT RECORDED IN O.R.BOOK 1185,PAGE 541, CONTAINING 13.650 ACRES MORE OR LESS. Page 12 of 16 H:12006120060631WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\Post CCPC1Brynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).doc Packet Page -3333- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Asitak E��IT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD Deviation No. 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1 to allow the floor area ratio(F.A.R.) to be increased from 0.45 to 0,60 for group housing/retirement community uses described in Exhibit A, Section II on up to 12 acres due to the limitations of the infill criteria of the GMP. Deviation No. 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.1, Sidewalks and Bike Paths requirements that requires sidewalks on both sides of the street. The deviation is to not require sidewalks on either side of the street if a sidewalk network is provided which continuously connects all development tracts to each other, to Pine Ridge Road, and to the east and west neighboring tracts. (See Exhibit C-lA, CPUD Master Plan). Deviation No. 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.H,Fences and Walls that requires when nonresidential development lies contiguous to or opposite a residentially zoned district, said nonresidential development shall provide a masonry wall or prefabricated concrete wall or fence. The deviation is not to require a wall or fence along the south property line where a lake or the southwest preserve area lies between the future commercial developed area and the south property line. Deviation No.4 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.0 which requires a 60-foot right-of-way width for local streets.The deviation is to allow for a 40-foot wide private roadway easement or right-of-way. (See cross section on Exhibits C-1A and C-1B, CPUD Master Plan). Deviation No. 5A seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.9.a, pertaining to setbacks for on premises directional signs which requires directional signs to maintain a setback 10 feet from the edge of the roadway, paved surface or the back of the curb. This deviation would allow the directional signs internal to the development to be located 5 feet from the edge of roadway pavement as depicted on the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibit C-1A). Deviation No. 5B seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.1.b which requires pole and ground 1 signs to be setback 10 feet from property line. This deviation is to allow the directional signs to be set back 3 feet from the property line only for the east and west interconnecting access road entrances as depicted on the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibit C-lA). Deviation No, 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.9.b, which allows on-premises directional signs to be combined into a single sign 64 square feet in area. This deviation is to allow two directional signs, each up to 64 square feet in area at the east and west interconnecting access road entrances as depicted on the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibit C-1A). Deviation No. 7 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.3,pertaining to directory signs which allows multiple-occupancy parcels or multiple parcels developed under a unified development plan with a minimum of 8 independent units and containing 25,000 square feet of leasable floor area to be permitted on a directory sign and which allows a minimum of 4 panels and a Page 13 of 16 1-1:\2006■2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\Post CCPC\Brynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).doc Packet Page -3334- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. maximum of 8 panels. This deviation is to allow a minimum of 2 independent panels to be displayed on the one directory sign at the project entrance on Pine Ridge Road as depicted on the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibit C-1A).If the developer elects to allow 4 or more independent panels on the one directory sign,the maximum sign area shall be 150 SF.If the developer elects to have 2 or 3 independent panels on the one directory sign,the maximum sign area shall be 100 SF. Page 14 of 16 H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\Post CCPC\Brynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012)aloe Packet Page-3335- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD TRANSPORTATION A. The development within this project shall be limited to 577 unadjusted two-way PM peak hour trips(or 504 adjusted two-way,PM peak hour trips),corresponding to the highest trip generation scenario of those proposed in the updated traffic study information dated October 13,2011 allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. The terms "adjusted" and "unadjusted" shall reference allowances for pass-by and internal capture trip reductions. For purposes of calculation of the weekday PM peak hour trip generation in this CPUD, the lesser of the weekday PM peak hour trips as calculated in the Institute of Traffic Engineer's (ITE) Report, titled Trip Generation, 8th Edition or the trip generation as calculated in the then current ITE Trip Generation Report shall be utilized. B. Shared access connections shall be provided to the commercial parcels to the east and west as shown on Exhibit C-IA, CPUD Master Plan. The cross-access connection and roadway shall be maintained by owner and may be a perpetual, non exclusive access easement or public right-of-way at no cost to the public. No - parking and no loading shall be permitted directly on the access roadway. C. The development will be allowed one driveway to Pine Ridge Road constructed at developer's expense and subject to applicable Collier County permitting requirements. D. A bus shelter area approximately 9 feet by 20 feet shall be reserved along the Pine Ridge Road frontage in an area generally shown on the Exhibit C-lA, CPUD Master Plan.The bus shelter may be located in the landscape buffer area. II. ENVIRONMENTAL The subject property has 7.16 acres of native vegetation and is required to preserve 1.07 acres. The preserve areas depicted on Exhibits C-lA and C-1B, CPUD Master Plan provide 3.10±acres to be preserved. III. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the First Community Bank of Southwest Florida. Should the Page 15 of 16 n H:\2006\2006063\WP\Rezone\Rezone 2011\Post CCPC\Brynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).doc Packet Page-3336- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval,the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. N. WALL The wall near the southerly property line depicted on the CPUD Master Plan(Exhibits C- 1A and C-2)shall be painted brown on the south side. • I I Page 16 of 16 1-1;\2006\2006063\WP\Iteione\Rezone 2011\Post CCPC\Brynwood Center PUDZ-PL-2011-0406 CPUD(08-07-2012).doc Packet Page-3337- 9/25/2012 Item 17.A. 24D )) Wednesday, September 5,2012 )) NAPLES DAILY NEWS • • NOTICE OF MEETING NOTICE OF MEETING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, September 25, 2012, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance..The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE F COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN F DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT WITH AN •f "ST" OVERLAY TO A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) ZONING F DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE BRYNWOOD CENTER CPUD TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 145,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL AND F OFFICE USES WHICH INCLUDE A MAXIMUM OF 25,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL 1 AND A MAXIMUM OF 60,000 SQUARE FEET OF MEDICAL OFFICE USES. ALSO PERMITTED ARE HOTEL AND MOTEL USES AT 20 UNITS PER ACRE AND GROUP HOUSING (ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AND INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS) AT A r FLOOR AREA RATIO OF .60, FOR EACH ACRE OF GROUP HOUSING OR HOTEL OR I MOTEL USE, 12,083 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL OR OFFICE USE SHALL BE SUBTRACTED FROM THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF ALLOWABLE COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PINE RIDGE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 980 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 13.65 +1- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If I recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to (lave,written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the . Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board- will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will heed a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim ' record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and • evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail,East, Building W, Naples, Florida 34112, • (239)252-8380. Assisted Listening Devices for the hearing impaired are available in the County Commissioners'Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA FRED COYLE,CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK By: Martha Vergara,Deputy Clerk (SEAL) eta. September 5.2012 No 1959557 Packet Page-3338-