The URL can be used to link to this page

BCC Minutes 10/02/1984 R ,·._'..·.~P"._.~".,...,., ..";."_",.""."_..................._~.,,,,....""'''','''." <.,_...,"---~._,-- .. .........._-"'...,."',.._--~,..._,..-......;.,-,.,.,"'_..~'" . :t';:~ ~~. . ¡~:},'~~' , )'''", ,~:'(...~ ," . , . , ,:;~:o~: 083' PAr,t 537 ".pe 11 ,..1 tea 11 r,"~:}.~, !,.:':~_ \·;t ACENM .. APPROVED AS AM" :lDED I(r\,,t . --.... '~ :", ' . y:...:,' ,.... 'Co_h. loner Kruse ."ved, .econded by Co_h.ioner VO.. and c.rri.d unaniaoußly, th.t the 'glnd. be approVld with the following - ...nd..nta. 1. Item October 2, 1984 , ¡,' I' 2. Item . " J. Item 4. Item 5. Itom 6. Item 12B - Di.cu..ion r. E..t Napll' WÐter Sy.tem., Inc. _ Added at Commi..ioner Holland's request. 68(1) - Potition R-84-21C, Wilson, Miller, Barton, 5011 , Peek, Inc. - Continu.d to 10/9/84 at r.quest of the petitionor. !>D(2) - He.lth In."rance Utilization Review Progrðm _ Mov.d to 9C(2) at County Manager'. request. IGB(2) - Bid Pack 112, Sit. Finish.s Justic. C.nt.r _ Moved to 9F(1) at County Manager'. requ.st. l~ - Recommendation to purcha.e Digital Rainbow 100 computer. for BCC offic. - Continued to 10/9/84 It County Manager'. request. l2C - Discussion of Fair Board officer. - Added by County Attorney. PROCLAMATION DISICNATINC THE WEEK or OCTOBER 7-13, 1984, AS SCHOOL BUS SArETY WEEK - ADOPTED Co_i..ioner Ho1hnd .ov.d, ..cond.d by Couli..ion.r P1at~ .:' and clrried unani.ou.1y, that the Procllmation d.. ignIting the we.k of October 7-13, 1984, .. School Bu. Slfety Week be Idopted. ' Ms. Sharon McCord accepted the Proclamation with thanks. Page 2 I&IJ Bi3 .. '-"----..'--,.,~~,.""'_...,,,.""".~-"'..,.-., ',;".....'".,'~--- , . ',..,;.,....1- ,;;.: ~ '," "'.~ 'f'/"''4.- . . " . ,.,'.~;',~:/.', I~::.-. ~~i'i·".','I,"'t(";.' ",¡(.1" : .;,~""'<.""~"'( "'J,t,.'S~' .,/:.'. ';;1Î~:"~:' .,'If, ""I ",!" I" , ,'·.If..,i.:.. \):\'1, '':.il':, tti,,1.,,\~'.,,'\ . ·}r~~,};~.} ,\:!,'~~i,~~;.';~~~.: Y('~~.:~·~'-'. '" >,' ~'~" ,Y,..J, '. "'.j\'~} ~lh~"'IA1.r :'.; ~~.'. ·"f ..,. '","' ,.....':'....- <, ~;'f~¡J'\: . (' ¡. ,l \~" ~:~fi'.I' 'rì1:Yl'ht:'"'''' ~~I '~',~' ~~. ~'rt~:f., ,..,,·;~?:;':1:;'1·¡:' :;\~ ,,~ 'Òoc 083'pi~t539>7};~'~': '.' ..", ¡":t' ",' " "",,.~ ,,' : I t.~.. . .;i')i:iÔî4:~.¡1;.tr: \Ü~;¡:f .,.' ',\",,~: "':"~1'I'-¡''''r'~;:: ,', \~·d'·noé:i.ÄMÀ,.iOí. ÓUr.C1IATIItO ftl WlEK or OCTOBER 7-13, 1984, AI ;~o/'!'."-H WiEle, - ADOt't¡'1) " >~l ,4, "'~' I :')';¡ \:',~ Co_laa i on... , loa. IIOv.d, ..conded by Co_la.ioner ,:;.~Y,'~.rrhd ~nanl.ou.iy, that. the proch.aUon dui9naUn9 October 7-l3, l'.4, a. National 4-8 W.ek be adopted. ~ Mis. Lavanda Cotton and Mr. Glenn Smith accept.d the proclamation with thanks and appreciation for the support'that 4-H has received from the Board. They described the activities in 4-" in which they are involved and presented tomato plants to the Commissiøners. " ~~.' Octobe r 2, 1984 ,-. ..' ..." ~ .' ,,' ":', ~ru.e and ,( (. ~:~ ~ the week of :>!~', ¡ '~, , , - . ;'>~'~~'" "'1i'/1: ':~,¡ ,";)?M' -"ji\~! c . ,. ~ ..-¡~ 1', ',' "~I-;'~ Pllqe 3 I&J .. BI .---. "~""=""''''''''--''''''_'''''~''''''''''';'' ..~'e,,.^,..,,<,,.. . ._.,,,,.,"=""",,....,-".'"'~.,....,...,,'''''~,<.... ..,.--..,......."....".,........".,_...._-"."'.--.....= _h, ,,"..-...."""'" '~""".."_."'..__.......',.....,..".,.-,., ",,"' '_"~.....",.-.." w;¡a - ¡¡¡ OctClber 2, 1984 Co..i..ion.r Pi.tor .oved, .econd.d by Commi..ion.r Kru.e Ind clrried unlnimo".ly, that the public h.arin9 be c10.ed. Comai..ioner Pi.tor mov.d, .econd.d by Com.i..ioner Kru.e Ind clrrled unlni.ou.~y~ thlt the ordinlnce I. numb. red and entitled below be adopted, aubject to Imend~.nt of the PUD document, Ind .ntered into Ordinance Book No. 191 ORDINANCE 84-70 AW ORDINANCI AMENDING ORDINANCI 82-2 THE COMPREHENSIVI ZONING RIGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, rLORI~ BY AMENDINC THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBIR 50-25-6 BY CRANGING THE ZONING CLASSlrICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED RIAL PROPERTY FROM "'-2 TO -PUD- PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR lAST NAPLES COMKUNITY PARK LOCATED EAST AND SOUTH or AVALON ELEKENTARY SCDOOL IN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE ~TE. Ite. 18 ORDINANCE 84-71 RE PETITION R-84-28C, ACNOLI, ASSAAD, BARBER, BRUNDAGE · SHANNON, INC.,RRPRESENTING MICHAEL MICELI, RE REZONING FROM A-2 AND C-4 TO PUD PROPERTY KNOWN AS MICELI PUD, LOCATED ON lAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NORTH or MYRTLE COVE SUBDIVISION - ADOPTED SUBJECT TO STIPULATIONS, PETITIONER'S ACREEKENT ACCEPTED Legal notice having ~cen published In the Naples Dally News on August 31, 1984, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public h2arlnq was opl!Oed to consider Petltlc,,' R-84-28C, filed by Agnoll, Assllad, Barbor, Brundage & Shannon, Inc., representing Michael Miceli, requesting rezoning from A-2 and C-4 to PUD for property known as Mlcall PUD, located on East Tamlaml Trail, north of Myrtle Covo Subdivision In Section 29, T50S, R26E. Planner Ober explðlned that this Petition Is In order to develop 60 multi-family units with commercial along u.s. 41. She said that Staff and all County agencies reviewed this petition and recommended approval of the revised PUD document subject to amen~ment of the PUD docunent per the revised St/lff rep(\rt dJted 9/13/04. She said that the CAPC held their public hellrlng on 9/20/84, and recommended forwardlnq the Petition to tho Board ~Ith the recommendation for approval subject to the stipulations on the Executive Summary dated 9/27/84. Co..ia.ioner Kru.e ~v.d, .econded by Co_i.sioner Pi.tor Ind __ carried unani.ou.ly, thlt the public hearinq be clo.ed. Co..iaaioner Kru.e ~v.d, .econded by Comai..ioner Pi.tor and clrried unlnimou.ly, that the P.titioner'. Aqreem.nt be Iccepted Ind that the ordinlnce I' number.d Ind .ntitled belov be Idopted, aubject to .tipulltlon., and entered Into Ordinlnce Book No. 191 aoo~ 083' rlr:~ 542 Paqe 5 '....--.,--..-. .-,-..- .----.-.-.---.. 1011( (J83' PAr,t 543' ' October 2, 1984 ,I,''' ORDINANCE 84-71 A. ORDINANCI AMIHDIMQ ORDINANCI 82-2 THI COMPREHENSIVE ZONINO RIOULATIONI ~)R THI UNINCORPORATED AREA or COLLIER COUNTY, rLORIDA 8Y ~q,DINO TSI ZONINO ATLAS MAP NUMBER 50-26-9 BY CBAaIOINO THI ;"0111..0 CLASSIrICATION OP THI HEREIN DESCRIBED RIAL PROPERn PROM A-2 AND C-4 TO ·PUD· PLANNED UNIT DEVlLOPMENT rOR MICILI PUD LOCATED ON THE lAST TAMIAMI TRAIL ACROSS FROM NAPLES MANOR AND NORTH or MYRTLE COVl SUBDIVISION, AND PROVIDING AN EFFICTIVE DATE. " (See hl.....J;'9.S" ) ....',. ! - ORDI~CI 84-72 RI PETITION R-84-29C, WILSON, MILLER, BARTON, BOLL' PIEX, INC. REPRISENTING W. L. BAINBRIDGE, RI REZONING PROM A-2 TO PUD FOR 83.7 ACRES KNOWN AS EASTRIDGE - ADOPTED SUBJECT TO STIPULATIONS, PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT ACCEPTED L.gal notic. having been published in tho N~ples Daily News on August 31, 1984, as evidenced by ^ffidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was ~pened to consider Petition R-84-29C, fil.d by Wilaon, Miller, Barton, SoIl, Peek, Inc., representing W. L. Bainbridge, requesting rez~nlng from ^-2 t~ PUD for 83.7 acres known as Eastridge located In Secti~n 4, T50S, R26E. Planner Ober stated that the objective of this Petition is to develop 83, single family lnts and 335 multi-family units with recrea- tional amenities. She said that Staff and all County ð~encles reviewed this Petition and rec~mmended approval subject to amendment ~f the PUD document per Staff report. She slld th,H the CAre held thv,\r public h.aring on 9/6/84, and recommended forwarding this Petition to the Board {or approval subject to Staff Itipulatlono. Co..iaalon.r Kruse .oved, aeconded by Co.miasioner Holland and clrrled unani.ou~ly, that the publIc h.lrin9 be cloa.d. Co..iaaioner Kruse moved, aecond.d by Co..iasion~r Piator and carrI.d unlni.ou.1y, that the Petitioner'a Agreem.nt be Icc.pt.d Ind that the ordinlnce la nwab.r.d and .ntitled b.low be adopted, aubject to .tipu1ationa, Ind enter.d into Ordinlnc. Book No. 191 ORDINANCE 84-72 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2 THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONINC REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 50-26-6 BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFIC~TION or THE HEREIN DESCRIBED RIAL PROPERTY FROM 10-2 TO ·PUD· PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR EASTRIDGE LOCATED WEST OF SABLE LAKES PUD SOUTH or RADIO ROADI AND PROVIDINC AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Page G BJ /IŒ] .. .......'~'"'"-'..~,, "'~""-_._"",.--~.,.,,--_.- ---"'-"'~"-"""-"--=*'-'''~ .. - .. October 2, 1984 '11 ~ISOLUTION 84-190 RI PETITION ~pu·84-13C, SAINT DIMETRIUS ORTHODOX CHURCH, RIC PROVISIONAL UBI ·c· or A-2 DISTRICT rOR A CHURCH LOCATID AT:' 140 PRICZ STRZI": .. ADOP'rID, rXNDINa-Or-rACT AND PITITIOIIIR'S AaREEMIIf'1'" ACCEPTED . .. Planner Ober explain.d thlt the ob~ective of this p.tition hto~;J~ us. the .~iating resid.nc. for a church. She aaid that Staff and'ail County aqoncl.s have r.view.d thia P.tition and r.comm.nd.d approval aubj.ct to tho stipulations liated in the E~ecutIve Summary dated 9/27/84. Gh. sðid that the CAPC held their public hearing on 9/20/84, and, bðsed on th.ir Finding-of-Fact, r.c~mmend.d forwardinq this Poti- tion to th. Board for apµroval aubj.ct to Stftff stipulltiona. She explained that one lettor was received opposing tho Petition, that two p.ople apok. in fðvor and on. peraon apoke against the Petition, citing the r.aidentiÐl nature of the Iroa Ind that traffic would b. gon.rat.d 1 f appro.,.d. Co..i..ion.r Holland ~ved, ..cond.d by Co.-iaaion.r Pi.tor and carri.d unani.oualy, that Reao1ution 84-190 r. P.tition PU-84-13C,b. Idopt.d, aubject to Stiff atipulltlona, Ind that the rinding-of-rlct Ind P.titioner'. Agr....nt b. Icc.pt.d. aCD( 083 PW 552 I'lIq. 8 ...---- ---.- ..~ "-""~"_,_,·"""",,,,",,·,,,,,,_,,__,,"o,;, ;''''"~'"''_'''«'_~'''''~'''', ' " "~__'''__,' "'''_'.'~''''''"___'__~'_,,"" . ~'_'-"""''''''''''_--_''''''''~'-''~,,,_."",..',",~,.,,,".,,,,,..< I&ii1 - r¡¡¡ October 2, 1984 '12 RESOLUTION 84-191 TO RECOVER rUNDS EXPENDED BY TH! COUNTY TO ABATE A puaLIC MUISANCI ON LOTS ~~ED ay MRS. LOUISE RUTH GRAY, PRICE ,UBDIVISIOH, aLOCK 2, LOT~ ,16-18 - ADOPTED . Community D.v.10pmont Administrðtor Virta said that thia item refera to removal of 92 yards of material from Lota 16-18, Block 2,in Price Subdiviaion, owned by Mrs. Loulae Ruth Cray, and that the cost is $404.80 plus $25.00 admlniatrativø feo. He request.d ~pprova1 for I.aessment of lien in order to recover the cost of tho abatement on thla proporty. Co..i.aioner Kruae .ovèd, .econded by Comai..loner PI.tor and cluied unlni.ou.1y, that Ruolutlon 84-191 to recover fund. expended by the County to abate I public nuialnce on Lot. 16-18, Block 2, Pric. Subdivi.ion, owned by Mra. Loul.e Ruth OrlY, be adopted. aCð~ 083 '.'.! 558 Page 9 - ------- .......""",..".-..."",""..-''''........-.''''.'.- , ..'''''''>-".,~,...--"',...,-',.".,''',..,."'',..''--"'',.,,~,-'''' r;::¡¡] - Iiii Ite. 11 J PETITION TR-S4-26C" JIM I,'HARA, RIQUESTING TEMPORARY RESIDENCE PERMIT TO UTILIZE MOBILE HOMI DURING CONSTRUCTION or A PRINCIPLI RESIDENCE AT 15th AVENUI, S.W., ON I 180' or TRACT 112, UNIT 27, GOLDEN CATE ISTATES - APPROVED Octo be r 2, 1984 Community Development Administrator Virta explained that Staff recommends denial of Petition TR-84-2GC because the property is not sUfficiently i.olated and doe. not meet the requirements listed on the Executive Summary dated 9/25/84. Mr; Jim O'Hara, petitioner, stilted he has a self-contained mobile home that he wants to USQ while he completes construction on his residence, adding that it will take approximatel~ two months to accom- pli S h t his. Tlpe 12 Mr. O'll/lrll said thllt there is a mobile home on the property next to his and he requested the same privilege in order to protect his property and the garden he has planted there. Responding to Commissioner Vose, Zoning Director Layne explained that Stalf recommended doniill ol the requ.est lor a mobile home on the property next to Mr. O'llara, however, the BOllrd approved It. CODai..ioner Vo.. mov.d, ..conded by Co.mi..lon.r Holllnd ahd clrried unani.ou.1y, that Petition TR-84-26C for I Temporary R..i~ence Per.it for Mr. O'Hara be approved. Ite. 114 EXCAVATION PERMIT NO. 59.197 rOR EAST NAPLES COMMUNTY PARK _ APPROVED SUBJECT TO STIPULATIONS Co..i..loner Kru.e moved, .econded by Cc..i..loner Pi.tor Ind carrIed unenimously, thlt Exclvltion Per.it No. 59.197 for the Ea.t Mlple. CODaunity Park, SectIon 24, T50S, R25E, .I.t .ide of AVllon El..entlry School on the south side of Thomls.on Drive be Ipproved .ubject to .tipulatIon. on the Executlv. Sum.lry dated 7/13/84. It.. 115 BID 1739 rOR GAS AND DIES!L rUp.~ - C~NTINUED TO 10/9/84 Leyel notice for Uid 173~ wa. published in the Napl.s Daily News on July 25 IInd 27, 1984 as evidencd by Affidavit of Publication pr.viou.ly liled with the Clerk. Administrative Services ^dministrator Blankenship stlted that Stall recommends that for Fiscal Year 1904-ß5 Bid l739 be ~warded to ';ombs Oil Com¡..,¡ny, tho presont fUI!J suppllor. 110 said that th6 bid 'C4IK 083 ,&~, 5GO PDqe 10 .. ---~-,--'.. ----.'""""~'''''''''''."._..""....''"..... ~",..o,,~ ,." ..','.~.'" """",'.'.."" '.<,,~",,'" 083 561 October 2, 19So1 am . mt . from Carrol Oil Co~pany, of Fort Myers, is not being recommended due to docl.lllent.d inabllit) of the company to meet servicing requirement.. He .aid that the CIty of Naples and tho Collior County School Bo.rd h.. b.en included in this bid in ord.r to maximize the price with bulk . purch..... He ..id th.t prices are compotitive with l.st year and that the estimated amount of County expenditure for 19S4-S5 for fuel is $525,000. Mr. Jame. Peterson, Presidont of Carrol Oil Comp.ny~ s.i~ in open bidding hi. company was the low bidder for Bid '7J9. He s.id that he is an employe. of Amoric.n ^gronomics Corporation, which owns Carrol Oil CompÐny, .nd th.t h. was lent to Fort Myers in the .ummer of 1982 to t.urn th.t comp.ny around and make it prosperous. He s.id that he initIlted new policies and procedures and that C.rrol Oil Company ~as grown ond now h.s more than 20 accounts in the Naplos or.,.. lie said th.t the company has branded Texaco .nd .lso carries unbr.nded fuel. ðnd that the company bid unbranded fuel for Bid '739, based on the guidance of purch.slng Director Thiele. He s.id that when t.king the discounts .nd tho handling charge his company Is signific.ntly less th.n Combs Oil CompÐny. He said that Carrol Oil Comp.ny w.s low bidder l.st year but did not recelye the bid .wðrd. He sðid, b,'se,~ upon the bid dat., Carrol Oil Comp.ny would .aye the tðxpayers of Collier County more than $12,000. He Dsked for reconsider.tion of this bid ðw.rd. Mr. Blðnkenship s.id that Carrol Oil Company w.s not recommended last ye.r because th~re was an incomplete bid DS to the name of the terminal, there was unsatisfactory service to the City of Naples cul~i- nating in a t~rmlnðt~d contract in lSal, .nd . Dunn ard Bradstr~ot rating of "Unstable With a Downward "rend". lie said.. this year, the company is not being recommended bec.use of questionable terminal prices giyen in the bid, contract discounts apparently are not being passed on to other local governments and there is no commitment to m~ke sm.ll quðntlty dellyeries. lie said that the City of Naples is recom- mending Combs 011 Company and .re not recommending the low bid of . Carrol Oil Compðny. County Attorney Saunders expl.ined that hr has mat with Purchasing Director Thiele and reviewed the items presented by Mr. Rlankonship .nd, bdsed on tho Information provided by ~r. Thiele, it w.s his opinion that this was not a conforming bid and that Bid 1739 could be awarded to the next lowest bidder. ~r. Patterson s.ld that his c~mpany has not delivered to Collier Pa 9 C! 11 5ltI ~;.~-1t;'7J t:!!!I £:¡¡¡J .. ¡;j¡II O<:tob.r 2, 1984 County or the City of Naples since 1981, which was the year that Agronomic. Corporation purchlaed Carrol 011 Company. lie said he was trying to find way. to .erve Col1i.r County and that he did not know how .lae to do thi~. than through the bid process. R.sponding to Commi.sioner Voss, Mr. Blankenship said that the itoms that art non-conforming aro the terminal pricos nnd that the discounts being passed on by the terminals Ðro not being pÐssed 'on to 'other companies that Carrol Oil Company services. H4 said that ho has documentation to this effect from Lee County, the Collier County School Board and the ci ty of Naples. lie said that thore are bid pricos aub- mitted by Carrol Oil Company that art, different from the prices do'éu- mented by the terminal. At ChaIrman ~rown's request, Mr. Saunders explained, by non-con- forming, he meant that the bidders were required to provide terminal prices of certain classifications of fuel at a specific day and those were provided by Carrol oil Company and Purchasing Director Thiele wrote to tho·terminal to check on the prices and he detormlned that the pricas were not as quoted at tho terminal on that particular day. lie said it was, therefore, hl9 opinion that this makes the bid non-con- forming and is sufficient cause for awarding the bid to Combs Oil Company. Uf} said thllt the oth<H problems /lssoclated with Carrol Oil Company dell1 with whether Staff feols that Carrol 011 Comrany would be a responsible bidder and Staff hils determined, based on past perfor- mance, that firm would not be a responsible blddor In this inst/lnce., Mr. Patterson said that he had the quoted prico to him at the terminal from the supplier that he bid on tryat date and It indicates in writing a 2\ discount for payment In cash on 15 days. He said that the prico that he bid included that discount and, thllrof,re, his price wa. less than that posted at th~ rack but did include the appropriate discount. Mr. Thielo said that the terminal price from the jobber in Port EverglÐdes does have a 2\ discount in the invoice and he did take that into consideration IInd the price givon in the bid was lower than that amount. lie said that the representÐtive from the jobber indicated that there Ire no other discounts given to other .uppliers of fuel. lie .aid that Staff has copies of the invoices given to the Lee County School Soard plus the bid, plus letters from the jobber saying that discount. were given throughout the yoar and that Staff noticed in the invoice that the price discounts Io'Ore not passed on. lie s¡¡id Staff wa. told by aoo( 083 rlêt 562 Page l2 ".__,._.___ '~___.4____~._.._.___ ~'-""'"-_._-....."..""._._"...,--"'.,,""'--_..__... eoo« 083'mt5G3 October 2, ]904 Mr. P.ttorson th.t thlt contrðct was not in effect. lie sðid h. con tlC- t.d the Dir.ct~t ~( Transportation for the Lee County School Board who~ re.ponded that theontract was in effect and, in his opinion, di.- counts vere not pissed on. He said that he h.d a letter Crom the City of Naple. statlnq that on three i..u.s thoy were not happy with t~e ~rvice that w.s provided by C4rr01 Oil Company in 1901, that invoice. were not corr.cted when they were found to be in error, deliverie. vere not m.de when roquest.d on time leavinq the City Dock without fuel, on occasion, .nd th.t this hÐppened at the time Mr. P.tterson took ov.r a. Executlv. Director. He said that the Dunn and Bradstreet S.rvice notos that the prlnclp.ls of the p.rent company are subst.ntially the s.me a. th..prlncipals of the C.rrol Oil Comp.ny. Commissioner Holland said h. did not like the type of r.port received this d.te, addlnq that he was. firm bellevor that if a company has. just .nd v.lld bid th.t company should be .warded the contract. He s~ld th~t Staff is qolnq on assumptions, In his opinion, that what happened In 1981 mlqht happen In 1984. ~r. Saunders said that he could not make a recommendation as to wheth.r ^ particular company would provide better service th.n another company. He said he could only t.ke Inform.tlon provided him by Staff and m.ke . d.termlnðtlon .11 to whether, under exlstln') COl' ,ty policy and Florid. law, the bOðrd Cðn award the bid to tho bidder recommend.d by Stðff or to lome other bidder. He sllld, In his oplnlon,'"based on the Informðtlon provided by Staff, the ~oard hðs ample support If it determines that this award should be made to tho bidder recommended by St~ff as op"ose::! to ....h.t ð(-'pelHs to bo tho lo....est bidder. He said he based this opinion on two things, that the bid can be considered non-con!orndng since the tormlnal prices thðt w.:ro quotod wero not tho termln~l prices thðt tita!f received when they checked on those prices .nd th.t Staff lI.s ¡J~termlnej, b.sud on prior oxp4trlence with Carrol Oil Company, that this company will not provide the service .nd dlllcounts th.t the other com¡;,]ny ....ould provlrte. Ho s.ld this make's the bidder a non-responsible bidder .nd, therefore, tho Commission could aw.rd the bid to the next bidder. County Man^~er tusk .skod If the St.ff chocked on any firms that Carrol Oil Company serves this date and Mr. Thiele s.id that Stðff investig.ted the toe County School Board. He s.ld they irltioted the contract this summer ðnd thll first InvolclI thoy had no reðson to question, however, hc' quostlnned It bucause of discounts thðt wore PAge 13 a::::::1 im:J c;œ '--_._-'--~""~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,'~"""-,,",,,,-,.._~, ,..""................... c::::;¡ - em Octobor 2, 19B4 apparently not pa..ed on to the Loe County School Board. H. .aid that he notifi.d the School Board that, based on Staff's research, they should que.tion this problem. Re.ponding tl'l rommi..ioner lIolland, Mr. Saunder. said that Iny- thing that involv.. T:.d construction, thÐt involv.. the us. of gal tlX, require. competitive bidding according to State Law. H.' .aid that there is County policy that requires competitive bidding which was utilized by tho Purchasing Dopartment in solicIting bids for this contract. Commlssionor Hollanrl said that he would like to know what is happening betweon Carr~l Oil Company 4nd companies they serve in Colli.r County. Nr. BlDnkenshlp .oid that he had a letter frl'lm the City of Naplea that refers to a period of time from 1973 to 19B1 and CommissIoner Holland said that this does not refer to 1984. He said that Staff i. using figures and st~tement. that woro made before Mr. Pattorson was involved with Carrol Oil Company. Responding 'to Commissioner Kruse, Mr. IIIÐnkenshlp said that the Customers aro Invoiced ot terminal prices with tho discounts passed on and that the Involco tho Le1 County School Boord received does not reflect that. Mr. Patterson explained that tho bidding procoss for Le. County was In tho Mðy-Juno tlme[rame for the period beginning August l, 1984 to July 31, 1985. He 8ðid ho was low bidder [or Lee County and that he recoived a call from Lell County School BOcHd in the "Jly tlmo- frame and asked If they could receive a load of fuel belore the con- tract time and he agroed, explaining that he would .ell it to them at the same pric. he bid and that was what he did. He said boginnlng August 1, 19B4 he became the Lee County supplier and he has received no complaints. 'Ipe 13 Mr. Sðunders asked if thoro was any discount to Mr. Patterson on this fuol and Mr. Patterson said there was not, repeating that he was not under the contract at the tlmo the roqu~st was made. Mr. Thiele explained tho Evðns 011 Company had a lower bid than' tho next two low bids, Carrol Oil :ompany and Comb. Oil Company, however, Evans Oil Company requested that their bid not be considered because they di~ not include the l4.7 cent tax in their bid and that i. required. Commls.ionor Holland lilted if tho contrÐct price that Collier County agrees to pay a suppllor has a fluctuating quality and Mr. aCQ( OgJ «'1',1 5fJ4 Page 14 ---- ~-_._'..- x __~""_"_'''''''''_U'_''''''',.,"-",,_, """"",..,~*,~,,..__~". ""-,>,, " H~'..",,,<~,,....v..,,",,,,__,,",,,,,,", 'I',:~:'" , . ' ~:;~~ ~ ':'}:~~~¡ ~·f ~ ~ :t¡j> "-¡':'~I' i;,,',~,:( ",,1,,"$~"'\ I , ';- {' ',~J, , '1~~ " ,~~~(, ':;"¡;Jiii ';.i,lt':: :,.~'",~2'~ '''i~~ " , . HI( 0831'1"! 5G5 October 2, 1984 Thi.le rea ponded that·the margin of profit a company is able to make i. conatant Ind the telmll..1 i. allowed to fluctuate the price. Commia- sioner Holllnd aaked if ,here ia a termination clause in the contract Ind Mr. Thiel. reapond.d that there is. Mr. patt.raon pointed out that ~omba Oil Company ha. a higher margin profit than his firm's profit Iftargln. Commislioner Krus. cuqgested that the Soard waIt for a week to l110w the Commissioners tI" Clpportunity to read all the back-up per- taining to the subject. Co..l.aioner Ho1llnd ~ved, :econded by Co~I..ioner ~ruse Ind clrrled unlnimously, that the award :or Bid 1739 be continu.d to 10/9/84. ···RECESSI 10106 A.M. R~CONVEN£DI 10129 A.M.... 116 I"PLEMENTATION or HEALTH INSURANCE UTILIZATION REVIEW PROGRAM _ APPROVED Administrative Services Administrator Blankenship explained the recommendation to Implement a UtJllzatlon Review Program In order to help reduce Insurance CClStS. IIc said thllt durin'1 the period October 1981 through úctober 1983 the health Insurance rÐtes Cor Colli" County increased by more than 200\ and that GulC Life Insurance Company has atated, in writing, that there 10'111 not be a rate increase this year, however, the CClunty still 'needs to Implement cost c~ntrol measures in order to ensure that Cuture rate Increases are kept at a minimum. He aaid that GulC LICe hils proposed that the CClunty Implement a Utili- zation Review Program and that the majClr purpose of this review Is to decrease health care costs by reducing the number of hospital days used by the County omploy~es. lie stat'!d that the three main components of the plan Include pre-,1dmlsslon certlClcatlon by a Utlli7,IItlon Review. Nurse, concurrent review while In the hospital with the physician and discharge planning. He said that It Is anticipated that all three ot those components 10'111 guide physlcl,ns to utilize less expensive Out-patient tr,.atment, reouce the number oC hospital days and discharge patients earlier. Mr. Blankenship salo that the patient has priority in all aspecta Ind that the program la Intended to eliminate over-utilization (If hospi t¡,li zation and reouee heal th Cllre bills. H"! sa Id the patient i::s cared for by the physician oC his or her choice and the doctor-patient relatlClnshlp is nClt dlsrupt~d. He naid that, when medically advisable, peg e 1 5 mi:J ~ t1im '"', --",......,"-""...~.,"''"''-,,-,-'',',~,',..,''--,- ,",----"-..',..,..._......'...__.'._~- ""_",,,,______"'",'"""_"'0 ;¡¡;¡ - c:r. Octoboc 2, 1904 the Utilization Heview Program recommends that alternative .etting. be con.iù.red for treatmont. Ha slid that omployees who do not wIsh to us. UtilizatIon r..,iow may elect to do so, however, thwy will be required to pay the' 'quivalont of on. day's semi-privato room rate in ord.r to avoid tho UtIlIzation Rovlew. Mr. Blankenship said that the cost to Implement UtilIzation Review is $l9,200 and, in order to get Collier County In the program, Gulf Life has propos.d thDt they will reduco the County's current insurance premilln by that same amount. He said that Implementlltion of tho program will require extensive education of the employees and that Gulf Life an~ the Personnel Department are prepared to do this. Responding to Commissioner Voss, Mr. Bl~nkenship said that tho $19,200 applies to a full year beginning October 1, 1984. He said Gulf Lifv takes care of assigning a full-time nurso to Naples Community Hospi tÐ 1. Co..i..ioner Kru.e aoved, .econd.d by Com.i..ioner Pi.tor end carried unani.ously, that the Utilization Review Program be approv.d. Item tl 7 RISOLUTION 84-192 REQUESTING THE ASSISTANCE OF THE rLORIDA LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM WTTH THE FLORIDA DEPT. or NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION or RECREATION AND PARKS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF lAST NAPLES COMMUNITY PARK - ADOPTED Public Services AdministrDtor Norton said this item is a recom- mendation for the adoption of a resolution which would allow the Staff to apply for a Land and Water Conservation Fund Grant from the State of Florida to bw used for tho East Naples Community Park. He said Staff would apply for approxi~ately $500,000 which is the cap allowed by the State. He said that the SO/50 m~tch would come from (':dsting bond monies thdt have been set aside for the develol~ent of this park. Co..I..ioner Xru.e moved, seconded by Commi.sioner Pi.tor and carri.d unlnimously, that Re.olution 84-192 requ..ting the a..i.tlnc. of the FlorIda Land Ind Nlt.r Con.ervltion Program with the r10rida Depart.ent of Natural Resource., Divi.Ion of Recreation Park. for the development of the Ea.t Naple. Community Park be Idopted. !CQ( 083 W,r 5Gô Page l'i .-.....,--' -_..-_. ..-- .... -'--...__......__...-...'''_'"".,'"'~,.''''_..._.,',','''~'''",.,"'''''~"...,'"',,--",,'0<.,,-.-,.....''''" ;¡¡¡ - ..... October 2, 1964· -"...'\ , . (I . ,<' .1,.....:, :::,i:~! . '¡< t'Î'i~~ .. ".~,~.. ~~~"JÌh," ~ It.. 118 LEASES BETWEEN NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND THI BOARD or COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~û~ ~IRCENCr MEDICAL SERVICES SUB-STATIONS LOCATED HOSPITAL PROPERTY '~APPROVED Public Servicos ^dministrator Norton said this item is a request for approval of the Qxecution of two leases with the Naples Community Hospital, one for tho City of Naples area. EMS sub-station and one for the new North Colli or lIoalth Center, to be opened the middle of October. II. said that the aqre.mont with tho the City of Naples '.ub-.tation has beon in existlJnce and it is ossontially' the sam. Iqro.ment with tho other .atellite. Co.-i.sion.r Hol11nd ~v.d, ..cond.ð by Comai..lon.r Pi.tor that the 1.1... b.twe.n Napl.. Co..unity Hospital Ind the Board of County Co..i..ioner. for Em.rq.ncy Medical S.rvic.. Sub-.tltion. loclt.ð on ho.piuJ. property b. approved. RQspondlnq to Com~18slon~r Voss, Mr. Norton said that this action would move the EM3 statIon from North TamIamI Trail to the new sitl and there would be a cost savIngs Involved. Upon call for the qu..tion, the .0tIon carri.d unlnimou.1y. m~ 083' ri~t 5G8 paqe l7 ----- ....,...._-,,~,,~,,~,___'~""i~...·"',,"''',.__~.. ""~""-"..........,.;_........,_.._,-"..._~._....._- '..... Iiii1 - ~ Octnber 2, ,1901\ Ite. 119 BID 1758, BID PACK 112 FOR SITE FINISHES, JUSTICE CENTER EXPANSION AWARDED TO MACASP~ALT IN THB AMOUNT or $272,642 ^aslstan't Cou' ty M/1nager Dordll aaid this item is a rocommenda- tion to award Bid ,7Sa for Bid Pack 112 for th~ Justice Center E~p/1n- 8ion. He sllld thðt laut week Stllff recomm~ndod thðt the bids for site finishes be rejected Ilnd that the item bo re-bid. lie said this was done with the bids received being approximately $47,000 less than the original bids. lie said that the requirements for fencing and the security gll:e wwr~ withdrawn from the bid p/1ck. He recommended tho award i~ the amount of ~272,GI2.00 be given to Mac/1sphaIt, Inc.,to do thw paving work under Bid Pðck H2. fll} Baid thf.lt S:afÉ will retain a seplrate fencing contr/1ctor tn instill 1 tho fence. fie said that Staff feels therc may be a $10,000 to $20,000 savings as a result of this action. Commissioner Holland lIoved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and carrIed unaniaously, that Bid 1758, Bid Pack 112 for site finishes for tbe Juatice Center Expansion be awarded to Macaaphl1t, Inc. in the a.ount of $272,642.00. Ite. 120 ^CREEMENT FOR PROSECUTION SERVICES BY THE STATE ATTORNEY'S OfFICE WITH COLLIER COUNTY AND THE CITY OF NAPLES - APPROVED County Attorney Saunders said that the contract for Prosecution Services by the State Attorney's Office with Collier County and the City of Naples is id~ntlcal to the contract that was ðpproved by the Board last year. lie said It provides that a Special Prosecutor will be provide~ by the State Attorney's office and that Collier County and the City of Naples will split the cost equally of that Prosecutor and the cost of eecretari/ll sarvlces to that Prnsecutor. fI'f. said he has been Idvised by tho City Attorney th/1t he is recommending this contract for approval by the City Council and, as soon as they sign it, he will pre- sent it to Chairman Brown for his signature and it will be forwardod to the Stata Attorney for his slgnnture. He requestad approval of the contract. COII.i,s!·mer Holland .oved, .econded by clrried unani.ousiy, that the agreement for Stlt~ Attorney's OffIce with Collier County approved. NOTE: COII.ia.ioner Krus. Ind Proaecution Servicea by the and the City of Naple. be Contract not received in office of Clerk of the Board a. of 10/11/04. aDaK 083 WI 582 Pag e 10 .---.--,.-.----- .. .- ------- ""-"___"'-_"" '.,____~_...._...,·.~~~,_~'~.,_.~"",',"~..,"v~,,"',."" ; ~ , " .....~, -'\. ~ . 'GOII; 083' '.~r 583 Ite. 121 October 2, 1984 , .. RISOLUTIOW 84-193 REVISING PERSONNEL RULES AND RECULATIONS rOR AUTHORIZED RE~~SI or INrORMATION - ADOPTED I,' '~,:;:;::~ë~·u~.ty ,Atto:uy S..und.~. explain.d thia ia a rocomJ:l.ndltio~ tOi,4~; ,:.mlneS, tho P.rsonnel RuIn. fl. .aid that the Florid. Suprom. Court.~ "t~:.~" r.cently rul.d that a 48 hour waiting pariod on tho disc10.ur. to the .,..~, public of'p.r.onnel record. is no longor valid in tho State of Florid. Ind this .mendm.nt olimin.tes the 48 hour waiting requirement that va. in the Col1i.r County Per.onnel ~ules Ind Regulations, to bring them in conformanc. with exi.ting Floridl law. Co..l..ion.r Kru.. .ov.d, a.cond.cS by Co..i..ion.r Vo.. Ind c.rrled un.nl.ou.1y, that R..o1utlon 84-193 r.vi.ing P.raonn.l Rul.. IncS R.gu1Ition. for luthoriz.d r.l.... of Intormltion b. Idopt.cS. Pago 19 111m BD BIll ·"""........·~."_,__''''",..,..."'"~'~''_''',c,_,',....,_$".,,'''.-.._'........_.."'""',,__'., ··""","..,.,.."""."'e...""'",.<o-,.,,""',_"" ~ '-"-_._-"-"",-,,,~-,..,._,.,,~..,.,.._..._,,,,,,,..,.,.,,,,_...,...,.,, """'''',""-,,,,,..,,.. - ., I~'- . --- tOOK 083' Pl~~ 587 Octobor 2, 1984 that are pending against the Individual Commissioners. He requested that this subject be continued for one Wlek. Mr. Caun~ers referred to the settlement submitted by East Naples Water Syatems. Ir'\c. and aaid thÐt in the cover lottor ho tried to out- lint for the Commisslonora what the history WÐS of the discussions concerning settlement of the disputes and tho fact that Staff has not bwen able to reach amicable rosolutlon of tho Issues at hand. He said he indicated in the letter that on September 20, 1984, he received a drift stipulation from Mr. Gatlin, who represents the utility. He said he had a discussion with Mr. Gatlin when he indicated to Mr. Gatlin that there was one Item that he needed to have In order to aettle the. dlapute., which Is an agreement by the utility that they will not contest the legal authority of CollIer County to condemn the utility to acquir. the system through eminent domain. fie IIlIid he WII& advlslld that th.re probably was no real baslll for challenging tho County's au~rority but thllt the plaintiffs in these f,/Jtter3 would not agree to thðt one stipulation. He said he Indicated, in the aforementlo~ed cover letter, that thlll was the only Itum the County requested and if the utility would agree to that the County would agree to everything else the utility re4uestud. Mr. Saunders said In the lllst paragraph of his letter he indicated that, since agreement could not be reached on thllt OIl,' Item, he was revoking all offers of settlement as of October 1, 1984, and that the reason he did this WIIS to clear the record so that two or "three months from now somebody could not come back and accept the County's offer. He sllid the WilY things stand at tho present time the Cnunty has no aettlllment offers on thll table and that he has Indicated he is willing, as is tho County ~an~ger, to sit down and begin negotiations again toward reJchlng an amicable settlement. He asklld for permission to pursue this route rather than engaging In settlement discussions this dllte. Cor.tndssioner Voss said that \olliS an excellent Idea, adding he wÐntod to know the new facts to which ~r. Saunders referred, before he would ~kv IIny decision. Ro:spondlng to Conlmlsa;lon-rr Holland, Mr. ::;aund"rs said hI! was not lIU9gestdlg thllt Stllff drop uvurythlng thllt has been done and that he has only cleared till: record in t.:rms of any outstandln9 offers. CommissIoner Krusu said that she would like to hear from Mr. $aunders the exact ramifications ~f the dlfforunces, pro ~nd con, between quick tJke ðnd condemnation ðnd she \oIoula agree to a ~eek's Pa 9 e 21 ¡c IIm:2 fB _.__-.o_.....,~""~~".'.'""'=."~.',.,""'".,,,..._""'"""_"''''''"~..._.«_._.,-',__.. .,..--""'__'f ¡;¡;¡a - ~ October 2, 1984 continuance. Commissioner Holland suggested that a workshop bo held with Mr. Saunders, tho County !""nÐger, the utility and the Board. Mr. Saunder. said that it appoar.cd tl him it would be b.ttor to nOCJotillt. s.tthmont of la~suits Þotw~en th~ County ^ttorn~y and the attorneya representing tho plÐintlffs or tho County Manager and the reprosentÐtives of the plaintiffs because it Is difficult in II public forum to say what ne.ds to b~ said since everything in settlement nogotiatlons is considered confidential bnd cannot be used In litigation. Tape '4 Commissioner rlstor nsked if Mr. Snunders' efforts are not to make the agreomont ruached comparable to all othor agruemants that the County has with other utility companies? Mr. Saunders said that this system is treated differently than other syatems In terms of aettleMent because it Is the aim of the County to acqulro thia aystem and the proposals he has suggested have been premised on the fðct that Collier County wants to acquire this system either through negotiated sale or throuqh eminent domain. Ho said he would not recommend anŸthing In this settlement thilt was suggested by the lIubschmans unless the Commia- sion and thu County Is jetermlneri to acquire that syatem. Commisaioner Holl~nd pOinted out th~t th~ Commission voted to acquire the syatem. County Kanagor Lusk pointed out that pnrt of tho stipulÐt',ns is the process of cùrrying out the policy of acquiring the system and that Is what the County has be~n negotl~ting. Mr. Harrison Hubschman, reprusentlng East Naples Wllter Systems, Inc., agreed with ~r. Saunders In that there is one item that cannot be negotiated which is that ~:ast Naples kilter Systums, Inc. give up the right to contest condemnation to the County. He said that he feela this goes to the hD~rt of the lawsuit and, according to his attorneys, his firm cannot give up that ri~ht becQuse that would mean tlßt Naples Water Systems, Inc. woulrt, bllslcal1y, drop their lawsuits. He said he did not know If a workshop would be productive. Mr. 5.:Iunders stilted that on October 1, 1984, the Court denied tlst Naples Water Systems, Inc.'s requost for Injunctive Relief to enjoin operation of various utility provisions in the Winter Park PUD and Ð motJon is pending for reconsideration. He read the following atatem.nt contained in that motion for reconslderAtionl -There ia no settlement Ind ~ith thd Defondants demanding that Plantiffs surrender their legal rights it is unlikely that this CAse can be resolved other than by aDOK 083'rl~f58B Paq. 22 ._'.."........'",~""~ --"'."""'""~."",,,,~,,,,~~..~-~,,,,,,,, ..,"",¥---~. "- '<,~.-..._---_._-.'- .---..'----,..-,.. m( 083plr,t589 Octobor 2, 1984 litigation of all issues." During the ensuing 1iscussion, Mr. Saundors said that, goIng to the heart of the lawsuit., is whether or not Collier County has any authority of any kind to regulate tho quality of service, the rates ånd anything d.aling with tast Naples WÐter System, Inc. He said that the t'irm .1lleges that there are no legislative acts or ordinances 'in Collier County that give the Board of County Commission the authority to regulate this utility in Ðnyway. Mr. Hubschman said that the issue is that the County wants his company to give up the right of condemnation in order to' sign thþ stipulation which would' nullify the lawsuits Ðnd give the company no standing. He said the firm has made the allogations because thoy felt, legally, they were required to do so in order to support their side. He said that hia company is willing to negotiate for the sale of the utility but that Winter Park has been hold up for three years and the County Mdnager, in conference with himself .1nd his broth'!r, has admit- ted that he did not think th,H t:asl Naplos Water Systems, Inc. will negotiate in good faith for the purchase of the plant. He said that a condomnatlon would be costly to tne County and negotiations would be the cheaper way to go. fie said that his firm Is willing to negotiate in qood faith. Commissioner Kruse said she was under the impreaslon that g~vern- mental bodies always had a ri~ht for acqJisition over a utility and she asked If there are now cases that say the County docs not have this right? Mr. Saunders p.xplained that there are some cases that indicate that there is a Prior Public Purpose Doctrine, when dealin~ ~ith emi- nent domain, lInd that it would tJe difficult for Collier County t~ acquire a piece of pro~erty owned by the City of Naples because the City could soy they Ire going to use that property for a public pur- pC\se. fie said that East Nilples \\ater r.ystems, Inc. is /'I public utility and has, supposedly, a public purpC\se and there could be some defense to the County taking the utility throuqh el1'.lnent doml\in. lie s1\id thllt it was his p"rs~nðl opinion that the County would prevail on this issuw, ho"ever, oighteen months to two years could be spent in litiga- tion over that ono issue. Mr. wsk said that if this occurs the planning procel!s would be stopped for the utility system and he dId not think th~ system could afford that amount of time. Commissioner Voss said that thIJ County has m&lde the utility an Page 2J am tm Œ.S -<-- - '-,._-',.-..._---~''"' "".'.",~.-,--"''''"'''"....._-~...''','"'--,....,'''' w¡¡¡¡ - r.;¡¡w Octobor 2, 1904 off.r which stAtes tho utility can have evorything it ·wants if the utility will give up tho right to contest the County's right to acqui- sition by eminent '10main. ' Commissioner V.'5 reforred to 0 conversation during which Mr. Hubschman said if tho utility did not got its way they wore going to "tie the County In knoto". H~ said thin is not any way to negotiate anything. Mr. Hubschman said that he said that .1fter Commissioner Voss provoked him to which ~r. S~undors stated, for the record, that he wos at that meeting and that Commissioner Voss did not provoko Mr. Hubschman in anywðy whatsoevor. Mr., llubschman said that the utility came in to negotiate for the ~inter Park arca to "untie that situation" and to negoti.1te for the sale of the utility and tho first twenty to thirty minutes of that discussion was devoted to East Naples Water Systems, Inc. providing service to Wind Star and ho was upset because of the fact that h~ ~~uld not even serve his own devulop:nent, Winter Park, and that Commissioner Voss was asking him to providu service to an outside customer before he could provide s\lrvice to his own development. fie admitted he made the aforementioned statement becausu he ~as upset over the fact that he could ask such ð thing. He said it was his right, as owner of his f utility, to service his pro~erty. Commlssionor Holland asked who would be responsible f'~ paying for the litigation, to which Mr. Saunders said that the litigat~on involv- ing eminent domain would be paid for by Collior County and If the County prevails in the lawsuits dealing with antI-trust Items the utility would PilY for that since that is not .1 cost that could be passed on as a rate caso expense. fie said in the pending rate case the rate payers will have to pùy. Commissioner Kruse said that tho final offers, which Mr. Saunders withdrew on OCtob.H l, 1984, gave East Naples Water Systems, Inc. everything the utility askod for with the exception of the right to object to the County's ability to take the plant, and Mr. Saunders stated that was correct. Commi~aioner Kruso said that Mr. Hubschman has told h~r several times that he did not mind if the County takes his utility as long al he receives a fair price. Mr. Saunders referred to Paragraph 5 of the utility's latest draft which states "In the event that an agreement for the purchase of East Naples Water Systems, Inc. cannot be negotiated, defendants may inlti- tute eminent domain proceedinqs for the acquisition of East Naples ~K 083' pgr 590 Page 24 '"'..."~~--,.._...._._,''''''''._,''''''''"'''''',o.__.._'''','__''',.,,_''''..~''''..,,_._.....',,",>K»; 083 Pl~~ 591 October 2, 1984 Wat.r Systems, Inc. pursulnt to FlorIda Law. EDst Naples Wlt.r Systems, Inc. re.'lrvu all of its ric;¡hU, undor Florida Law, with r.3pect to a con( Jmnation.- Commis.ioner Kruse said this stat.ment would loave the utility the right to objoct to thu County's right to condemn,and Mr. Saunders agreed. Mr. l~bschman said he could not give would b. qiving up his lawsuits. H. said the East Naples Water Systems, Inc. plant his growth. A discussion followed regarding the date when this discussion would be contInued, with Mr. Saunders stating he would not be present at the October 9, 1984 BCC meeting and Commissioner Voss stating he would not be present at the October 16, 1984 BCC meeting. Co..is.loner Pistor .oved, seconded by Comai.sion.r Kruse ana carried 4/1, Co.mis.ioner Vo.s opposed, thlt the dl.cus.ion regarding, Ea.t Naple. Water Syste.s, Inc. be continued to Octob.r 16, 1984. Ite. 126 up that issue because he that the County has devalued over the years and stifled DISCUSSION or COLLIER COUNTY rAIR BOARD OrPICERS - CO~TINUED TO 10/9/84 At the beginning of the meeting, County Attorney Saunders said that the discussion concerning the Collier County Fair r'ard was to be' brought back at this meeting after advertising. He said that the advertisement had becn placod in the newspaper and called 'for new members to be considered for the officers ana directors and that the new membcrshlp includes those persons applying up to Octobcr 8, 1984. He suggested that this item be continued to OctC'lber 9, 1984. Comais.ioner Kruse .oved, .econded by Comal..10ner Holland and clrried unani.ously, that the discussion of the Collier Cou~ty Pair Board officers be continued to October 9, 1984. ...The following it.~s were Ipproved and/or adopted und.r the Consent Agenda by motion of Co..i.sioner Kruse, .econded by Commissioner Holland Ind carri.d unani.ou.ly.··· Ite. '27 RESOLUTION 84-l94 DESIGNATING COUNTY EMPLOYEES AS ZONINC INVESTICATORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 82-20 Sec Pdges .';-9~ Ite. '28 PETITION TR-84-4C, CEORGE L. HENDRICKS, RE ) MONTH EXTENSION TO TEMPORARY RESIDENCE PERMIT POR E 75' or W 150' or TRACT IJ, UNIT 26, GOLDEN CATE ESTATES paqot 2S ¡m ŒCJ l1li .".,._ ~ ~ .,0-.- ~..._ _ _..~_... ~__ .__ _ . ~ 'OO( 083 P~'.f, 593 Ite. 137 ACCEPTAIICJ ".. RESIGNATION FROM CAPe FROM MR. PAUL FRANK, AUTBORIZATIOlf TO ADVlRT¡SI ~OR A MEMBER TO rILL VACANCY October 2, 1984 It..'U8 'DUPLICATE TAX SALE CERTIFICATES '5309 AND 11018-77 '1'0 BORIS BORSHOrF AND NINA CARRIRO - S.. P/lC;¡eI ~9- t,O/) Ite,. 13~ MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE - rILED AND/OR REFERRED There baing no objection, the Chair directod that the followlnq correspondence be referred and/or filed liS, followsl l. Notice of Public Hearing receiv.d 9/18/84, C~mm~nlty,Service. Block Grant, State Administrative Pl~n, Federlll r!!~al Year 1985, to be held on 9/28/84. FIled. 2. Memorandum datad 9/l9/84, from nich~rd F. e..rrett,' Div. Director, Dapt. of Community Affairs, re notification of Small Cities CDBG Program ~orkshop to be held 10/5/84. XCI Ms. I\illi~mson. Filed. 3. Copy of lett~r dat<:d 9/20/84, from Rep. H~wkins to Lt. Gov. ~lyne Mixson encourDglng appr~val of Collier County's application f~r a ~mDll Cltios Community ~velopment Block Grant. xc: Ms. I\llliamson. Filed. 4. Departmental Reports: Filed. A. Medical Examiner, September, 1984. B. Ca pit a 1 Improvements, St.ltus of projocts, Public Wo rks, 'Transportation, July, 1904. C. Capital Improvements, Status ~f 'Projects, Public Wo rks, Engineering, July 1 to September .1 4, 1981.. D. I.ibrary, August, 1984. S. Copy of lettur dllted 9/20/84, from Chief Reeves, Golden Gate Fire Control & Rescu(¡ Dlst., to Statt: Dt:pt. of Revenue, Div. of Ad Valorem 'Tax enclosin9 copies of required documents pursuðnt to florida Statutas pertaining to budget Ddopted by the G~lden Gate Fire Contr~l , Rescue District. Filed. G. Lotter dated 9/24/84, from 'terosa B. Osborn r>f Intern.'\til'lnlll Systems, Inc. plus data to updllte Collier County on services that can be offered by 151. Filed. 7. Copy of letter dated 9/12/84, from E. Russoll Smith, Chief Inspector, Florida D~pt. of Corr<:ctiClns, re an Inspection of N.1ples City JaIl on &/23/84, when there were no deficiencie.. FIled. paqe 27 - II!I - -..,"',_..'..,''''"'~.~~<"'....'.....~--,.,~.. ."...",..,'''''''''''''~''',....__.....,''''''''''.",'....~"'',.. -"""'"" ,','" ".' ".-,...~..-..,"',..'.,"'<,,'"~.._'"...,"""'.,,""-,""..-'''''',_.. ,~"""""".,'"",~"-,-"-,.''''~,, -'-~---""---'''''-,-~-,-'~...~._'"''"'.._...~."- ". . q~ . , ~:':',!~;. .' :;',-·1~ :';ft "~'};4~ , t'~~'~~ " ~:~~ . .~);tt, ":r~' . ,~ :i~ '...,..-,...'e_".._._",__._""'_,,,,"""',_,__,_"..._"',,,,,,,. "_"'_"~~'_"""'_''''''''''__,"_I''h_'__'''''_'''''''''''_''_'';¡_'''''''"''.,¡""~",...".",,