Agenda 04/10/2012 Item #11IProposed Agenda Changes
Board of County Commissioners Meeting
April 10, 2012
ADD ITEM #III: RECOMMENDATION TO PROVIDE DIRECTION
TO RESOLVE OUTSTANDING Q UINCY SQ UARE HOMEOWNER'S
ASSOCIATION DISCUSSION TOPICS FROM THE MARCH 27, 2012
MEETING; A GENDA ITEM #I1 F (STAFF'S RE UEST)
Continue Item 11E to the April 24, 2012 BCC Meetina: Recommendation to approve Neighborhood
Stabilization Program (NSP) Developer Agreements with Habitat for Humanity of Collier County, Inc.
thereby implementing the NSP Exit Strategy and providing access to $3,495,749 in federal grant funding.
(Staffs request to clarify and finalize contract language in discussions with the Clerk's Office)
Move Item 16D1 to Item 11J: Recommendation to approve a Work Order with Atkins North America, Inc.
for Clam Pass Joint Coastal Permit under contract 09- 5262 -CZ for a not to exceed amount of $7,672.
(Commissioner Hiller's request)
Note:
Item 16D2: Title on the agenda index should be revised to read the same as the executive summary:
Recommendation to approve a budget in the amount of $41,360 $21,880 for the Vanderbilt Beach Access
signage installation and access amenities pursuant to a Board approved Settlement Agreement dated August
29, 2011, and make a finding that this item promotes tourism.
Time Certain Items:
Item 11A to be heard at 11:00 a.m.; immediately followed by Item 11B
Item 11H to be heard at 1:30 p.m.
Item 11I to be heard at 2:00 p.m., subject to Add -On being accepted by Board
Item 14A2 to be heard at 3:00 p.m.; immediately followed by Item 14A1
4/10/2012 9:02 AM
Ada O(t
Patricia L. Morgan Lf 1101Z.012-
From: BrockMarylo <MaryJoBrock @colliergov.net>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 8:45 AM
To: Minutes and Records
Subject: FW: Quincy Square at Madison Place Condominium Association, Inc./Water Meter Issue
Attachments: Quincy Square - Final Package 04 -10 -12 v3.pdf
Good morning Minutes and Records.
Add -on to tomorrow's agenda, Item I 11.
Have a good day!
M1
From: OchsLeo
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 8:35 AM
To: BrockMaryJo
Subject: FW: Quincy Square at Madison Place Condominium Association, Inc. /Water Meter Issue
From: OchsLeo
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2012 9:43 AM
To: Rob Samouce
Cc: Michael Etelamaki; TeachScott; Sheffield Michael; KlatzkowJeff; YilmazGeorge; John Flynn (QSMP); HillerGeorgia;
CoyleFred; FialaDonna; HenningTom; ColettaJim; Dwight E. Brock
Subject: RE: Quincy Square at Madison Place Condominium Association, Inc. /Water Meter Issue
Good morning Mr. Samouce,
I had intended to bring this item back to the Board on April 24th to allow additional time for staff to complete modeling
analyses on the various piping and meter size configurations discussed on March 27th. I believe this is important
information that several of the Commissioners mentioned was missing from the original executive summary. A review
of the initial BCC meeting recap document indicated that this item was to be continued to a future meeting.
However, a review of the video tape indeed confirms your understanding that this item was to be brought back at the
next (4/10) meeting. Therefore, I am attaching herein the executive summary and backup materials I will be requesting
the Board to add to the April 10, 2012 BCC meeting. I will ask the Chairman to set this item for hearing at 2 p.m.
I apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused you or your clients.
Sincerely
Leo Ochs
1
From: Rob Samouce [ma i Ito: RobSamouce @smglawfirm.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 3:53 PM
To: OchsLeo
Cc: Michael Etelamaki; TeachScott; Sheffield Michael; OchsLeo; KlatzkowJeff; YilmazGeorge; John Flynn (QSMP);
HillerGeorgia; CoyleFred; FialaDonna; HenningTom; ColettaJim; Dwight E. Brock
Subject: RE: Quincy Square at Madison Place Condominium Association, Inc. /Water Meter Issue
Dear Mr. Ochs,
I reviewed the draft April 10 County Commissioner's Meeting agenda online and did not see an agenda item for Quincy
Square's request for future water bill credit. At the last County Commissioner's Meeting of March 27, 2012, the
Commissioners voted unanimously to have this issue put on the next Commissioner's Meeting (which would be this
coming'I'uesday's April 10 meeting) agenda to wrap up the amount of water bill credit to be given to Quincy Square at
Madison Place Condominium Association, Inc. after County staff had inspected all the water meters and pipes to
determine the amount of credit. The task of inspection the meters and pipes by the Staff was completed on March 27`h,
2012.
Therefore, pursuant to the Commissioner's directive of March 27. 2012, could you please add this matter to the agenda
and let me know it has been added.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.
Regards,
Sys >1tr
sA. 4OUCE, N Ui F'h & GAL, P.A.
ROB SAMOUCE
Samouce, Murrell & Gal, P.A.
Main: Branch:
5405 Park Central Court 2709 Swamp Cabbage Court, Suite 204
Naples, FL 34109 Ft. Myers, FL 33901
Phone: (239) 596 -9522 }
Fax: (239) 596 -9523
For additional information, please
visit: http: / /www.smglawfirm.com/
From: YilmazGeorge [ mailto :GeorgeYilmaz @colliergov.net]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 9:39 AM
To: John Flynn (QSMP)
Cc: Rob Samouce; 'Michael Etelamaki'; TeachScott; Sheffield Michael; OchsLeo; KlatzkowJeff
Subject: FW: Hypothetical Quincy Square Account Differences - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail)
Mr. Flynn,
Thank you for the information — The staff is diligently working on the subject matter following
the Board direction received on March 27, 2012. We'll get back with you as early as possible
including a meeting request.
2
Since you have retained counsel on this matter, and are copying him on your communications
with staff, please include the County Manager and the County Attorney (with your attorney's
approval) on your subsequent communications. As we work through this issue, we will be
sharing our respective findings with the County Attorney's Office for review.
Best regards,
G. George Yilmaz, Ph.D., P.E., P.H.
Public Utilities Administrator
From: John Flynn (QSMP) [mailto:iohnflynn ftuincysquare.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 1:22 PM
To: YilmazGeorge
Cc: HillerGeorgia; HenningTom; CoyleFred; ColettaJim; FialaDonna; Dwight E. Brock; Crystal K. Kinzel; RaineyJennifer;
'Rob Samouce'; 'Michael Etelamaki'
Subject: FW: Hypothetical Quincy Square Account Differences
Importance: High
Dear George,
I have updated staff's attached file based on staff's onsite inspection of the water meters and water
pipe service lines on Tuesday, March 27, 2012. 1 have added a credit for the pool water meter at
7839, since a 1.5" water meter was installed on a 1" pipe and deducted the credits for 7869, 7859 and
7852, since 2" meters were installed on a 2" pipes.
The total credit I have calculated is $ 107,076. Please confirm your agreement with this number and
that this credit will be used against all Quincy Square water bill charges until the credit is
exhausted. Please also advise when the 1.5" water meter will be replaced with a 1" water meter on a
1" pipe at the pool at 7839 Clemson Street.
I appreciate your assistance in this matter. Have a good weekend! Kindly contact me with any
questions. Thank you.
Regards,
John Flynn
President
Quincy Square at Madison Park
Direct: 440 - 339 -9973
This email is privileged, confidential and /or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of
this email (including any reliance thereon) is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please immediately contact the sender and delete the material
in its entirety. Thank you.
Under Fkxidi:i Law, e -mail <addmsses are public records. If you do not want your e-i nail address released in response to a public records request, do not send
<-�loctronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to provide direction to resolve the outstanding Quincy Square
Homeowners Association discussion topics from the March 27, 2012, meeting, Agenda Item
11 F.
OBJECTIVE: To provide the Board of County Commissioners (Board) with alternatives to
resolve all outstanding Quincy Square concerns.
CONSIDERATIONS: On March 13, 2012, an attorney representing the Quincy Square
Homeowners Association ( "HOA ") appeared before the Board via public petition (Agenda item
6 A) and requested financial relief from the Collier County Water -Sewer District ( CCWSD) in
the form of a credit for funds already paid for water bills. On March 27, 2012, the item was
discussed in further detail as Agenda item 11 F. The Board directed the County Manager to have
staff present additional details and information sufficient to allow the Board to make an informed
decision on a fair and equitable resolution.
Staff has prepared materials to address items brought forth during the March 27, 2012 meeting.
The Board acknowledged that the installation of the 2" meters for the 4 -unit residential
buildings was a result of the developer's request. The engineer and attorney representing
the HOA stated on record that there was a staff error in the meter sizing process by not
having completed Meter Sizing Forms for all permits issued in 2005. The following
information is provided to correct the record.
A Meter Sizing Form would not have been requested of the engineer of record as it was
not required for a multi - family building meter size determination in 2005. In 2005, the
Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance (CIFO) 2001 -13, as amended, governed the multi-
family building meter sizing process through Appendix A, Schedule Two (Attachment
A). The meter size was determined by the buildings Equivalent Residential Connection
(ERC) value. The ERC value was determined by the square footage of the unit.
An ordinance change in 2007 (Ordinance 2007 -52) began the use of fixture values to
determine meter size. The meter size for a multi - family building according to the current
standard is determined by evaluation of the fixtures, or by the engineer of record
(Attachment B).
2. The Board indicated that it is inclined to authorize a credit for services paid for that were
not received. Direction was given to review the residential service lines installed by the
developer, analyze the findings, work with the HOA representatives, and provide values
for services provided and received.
With existing practices and procedures, the CCWSD has limited ability to determine the
diameter of the residential service line (the pipes leading from the meter to the residential
building) installed by the developer, unless CCWSD is granted access to private property.
To complete the review requested by the Board, the HOA during the March 27, 2012
meeting granted permission for staff to access private property. Staff proceeded to dig up
and restore private property to evaluate the residential service lines (identified all 1.5"
residential service lines but one).
As stated above, the 2" meters were installed at the developer's request. It is important to
note that the developer of Quincy Square designed, constructed, and paid for the
installation of the water mains, the water main service lines (the pipes leading from the
water main to the meter location), and the residential service lines (the pipes leading from
the meter to the residential building). The residential service lines were installed by the
developer's plumber after CCWSD staff installed the meters. At the time the 2" water
meters were installed, there was nothing inconsistent on site to indicate that a 2" meter
was not appropriate. Even if an 1.5" residential service line had been evident, the
installation of 2" meters would not have been contradictory to design capacity as there
are benefits to the configuration that may have been the intended purpose of the original
request by the developer.
Staff modeled and analyzed all water main service line —to meter —to residential service
line scenarios discovered at Quincy Square (Attachment C). The results demonstrate that
the HOA received benefit from having 2" meters even though 1.5" piping was used
downstream of the meter. Almost all of the available capacity was realized, with no
perceptible loss of pressure. Public Utilities engineering staff concludes that upgraded
and tangible services were received by the HOA as a result of the developer's request to
install larger size meters above the CCWSD's established minimum meter size.
3. Staff developed the following financial alternatives to resolve all outstanding concerns
with the HOA.
Alternative 1
L Waive all meter installation costs. It should be noted that the original full
cost estimate for the cost of the removal /installation of the meters was
quoted as $14,440. Staff ultimately reduced the cost to a total of $1,770,
by including 17 of the meters under the meter replacement program.
ii. Provide a credit for the Recreational bldg. /pool meter in the amount of
$4,269.62 for a 4 year period.
iii. Provide no reimbursement for the residential buildings based on the
derived benefit of the requested 2" meters over the minimum meter size
requirement of a 1.5" meter. Attachment C summarizes the benefits
received in terms of capacity (gallons per minute) and pressure.
iv. Charge $14,938.12 for unbilled sewer usage for 7820 and 7844 Clemson
St. over a period of 4 years ($1,244.84 has been paid to date).
v. Net value equals a balance due of $10,668.50, net of payments to date.
Alternative 2
i. Waive all meter installation costs. It should be noted that the original full
cost estimate for the cost of the removal /installation of the meters was
quoted as $14,440. Staff ultimately reduced the cost to a total of $1,770,
by including 17 of the meters under the meter replacement program.
ii. Provide a credit of $101,273.46 for the billing differences for each account
over a period of 4 years (includes the Recreational bldg. /pool) .
iii. Charge $14,938.12 for unbilled sewer usage for 7820 and 7844 Clemson
St. over a period of 4 years ($1,244.84 has been paid to date).
iv. Net value equals a credit of $86,335.34, net of payments to date.
Alternative 3
i. Waive all meter installation costs. It should be noted that the original full
cost estimate for the cost of the removal /installation of the meters was
quoted as $14,440. Staff ultimately reduced the cost to a total of $1,770,
by including 17 of the meters under the meter replacement program.
ii. Provide a credit of $117,707.91 for the billing difference for each account
from the time utility services were initiated (includes the Recreational
bldg. /pool).
iii. Charge $18,171.02 for unbilled sewer usage for 7820 and 7844 Clemson
St. from the time utility services were initiated.
iv. Net value equals a credit of $99,536.89, net of payments to date.
The Board's selection of either Alternative 2 or 3 could potentially shift developer
responsibilities and liabilities to the CCWSD that do not exist under current ordinances.
FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal impact will be determined by the decision of the Board. It could
range from an increase in CCWSD operating revenues of $10,668.50, to a decrease of
$99,536.89.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management plan impact
associated with this executive summary.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is legally sufficient and requires a majority vote for
Board action. - JBW
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners, as Ex- officio the
Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, provide direction to resolve the
outstanding Quincy Square Homeowners Association discussion topics from the March 27,
2012, meeting, Agenda Item 11 F.
PREPARED BY: Tom Wides, Operation Support Director, Public Utilities Division
ATTACHMENT "A"
RESOLUTION NO. 2004- IL83 v 19
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SCHEDULE TWO OF
APPENDIX A OF CHAPTER 74 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF
LAW AND ORDINANCES, AS AMENDED, (THE COLLIER COUNTY
CONSOLIDATED IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE) TO INCREASE THE
WATER IMPACT FEE RATE FROM $2,570 PER EQUIVALENT
RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION (ERC) TO $2,660 PER ERC (A 3S
PERCENT INCREASE); AND TO INCREASE THE SEWER IMPACT
FEE RATE FROM $2,950 PER ERC TO $3,010 PER ERC (A 2.0
PERCENT INCREASE) FOR ALL CUSTOMER CLASSES; PROVIDING
A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 1, 2004.
WHEREAS, on March 13, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners
(Board) adopted Ordinance No. 2001 -13, the Collier County Consolidated Impact
Fee Ordinance, repealing and superceding all of the County's then existing impact
fee regulations, and consolidating all of the County's impact fee regulations into
one Ordinance, codified in Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Law and
Ordinances (the Code), and incorporating the water and sewer impact fee rates
established by the adoption of Ordinance No. 98 -69; and
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2001, the Board adopted Resolution No.
2001 -488 to amend Schedule Two of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Code, as
amended, (the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance) to increase the
Water and Sewer Impact Fee rates and direct staff to update the Impact Fee after
one year; and
WHEREAS, in accord with that direction, staff retained Public Resources
Management Group, Inc. (Consultant) to review the existing water and sewer
impact fees and to recommend changes to those fees when appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has recommended that the County increase
water plant capacity by thirty (30) million gallons per day, and to increase sewer
treatment capacity by eighteen (18 million) gallons per day over the next ten (10)
years, at an estimated cost to future utility system users of approximately four
hundred and eighty -two million dollars ($482 million); and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has recommended a water impact fee rate
increase from $2,570 per ERC to $2,660 per ERC, (an increase of $90 - or 3.5
percent); and a sewer impact fee rate increase from $2,950 per ERC to $3,010 per
ERC (an increase of $60 — or 10 percent) for all customer classes, based on ERC
equivalents; and
ATTACHMENT "A"
WHEREAS, the above recommended rate increases establish the al
rates at the maximum rates allowed in accord with Florida law; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the Consultant's recommendations and
staff concurs with the recommended increases and recommends that the Board
adopt the attached revised Schedule Two of Appendix A of Ordinance No. 2001-
13, as amended, to implement these recommended water and sewer impact fee
rate increases; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners accepts the
recommendations of the Consultant and from staff.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
The Board of County Commissioners hereby declares, after
advertised public hearing, that the water and sewer impact fee rates set forth in the
revised Schedule Two of Appendix A of Ordinance No. 2001 -13, as amended,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference (being a part
of the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance), arc fair and
reasonable and are to be assessed against development that will receive benefits
from increased water facilities capacity, increased sewer facilities capacity, or
both, which increased capacity is necessitated by growth.
2. That these revised water and sewer impact fees will take effect as
of 8:00 A.M, on Tuesday, June 1, 2004.
This Resolution is adopted after motion; second and majority vote
favoring adoption this day ._ 2004.
•; A'T'TEST
1*10HT.E.•'BROCK, Clerk
r •� 'ti
B
Do. ty'Cler
•Attist eso Chi
signat.'0 only..
Approved as to form
and legal'sufficiency:
Thomas C. Pa mer,
Assistant County Attorney
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER CiAPIALA,Chairman Y, FLORIDA
By:
DON
Rein # /_
Du10
Cato
kac d
vrvr/ Clef
ATTACHMENT "A"
8�
APPENDIX A
SCHEDULE TWO -EFFECTIVE APRIL 14, 2004
WATER & SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
RESIDENTIAL
INDIVIDUALLY METERED
I i I s Y?79
---- ------
I
5,000 ANN."I w
ton Afum
NON-RESIDENTIAL
WATER ME TER WATER IMPA CTFEE SEWER IMPACT FEE
SIZE EA C RANGE MIN MAX MIN MAX
ERC
WA TER
SEWER
LIVING SPACE
BASIS OF FEE
METER SIZE (dqww&ol
IMPACT FEE
IMPACT FEE
(SQ.FT,)
ALLOCATION
$6,42
44
24
sjjo
... ....... ..
SSA
r—worwwo owl
RESIDENTIAL
4 ➢
P*hM
METERED
43"
---MASTER
ERC
WA TER
SEWER
LIVING SPACE
BASIS OF FEE
METER SIZE (Eqwvwmf itaid"041
IMPACT FEE
IMPACT FEE
(SQ. FT.)
ALLOCATION
I i I s Y?79
---- ------
I
5,000 ANN."I w
ton Afum
NON-RESIDENTIAL
WATER ME TER WATER IMPA CTFEE SEWER IMPACT FEE
SIZE EA C RANGE MIN MAX MIN MAX
j AS
$6,42
44
24
sjjo
... ....... ..
4 ➢
P*hM
43"
SS&O
60060
$9jO,46 $;,sQ,000
"TAlf-ATels"ll ",L 4"T,
APPENDIX A
SCHEDULE TWO - EFFECTIVE June 1, 2004 8-k-7,L
WATER & SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE RATE SCHEDULE
RESIDENTIAL
INDIVIDUALLY METERED
OF FEE ERC WA TER SEWER
LIVING SPACE BASIS METER SIZE (equioffni MpA C T FEE IMPACT FEE
(SQ. FT.) ALLOCATION "dwtw COn Kod(off) --
$3,010
0 TO 4,999 1 3/4" $2,660
4 PER UNIT i
1-10 NO Nollo rfflo
PER 1153PM 4 +1 ASED 4 ERC
5,000 OR MORE $3,010
0'+'
PER IM; FRC 901A 141-1) Minimum 660
(09 MORE THAN 4 BATNROOMSI
RESIDENTIAL
MASTER METERED
"Nowasommmmo.wo
ERC WA TER SEWER
I
LIVING SPACE BASIS OF FEE METER SIZE faqat"kiff RamolvOw IMACT FEE IMPACT FEE
(SQ-FT-) ALLOCATION
$1,005
0 TO 750 PER UNIT PF R ERC 0.33 $890
751 TO 1,500
I
PER UNIT
PER ERC
0.67
$1,775
I
$2,010
1,501 TO 4,999 PER UNIT
PER ERC
1.0
2 !
$,660
$3,010
(AND NO MORE THAN e
NAMROOW)
(GPM•24)Y/20) 1
$3,010
5,000 OR MORE
PER ERC I
PER ERC
eGfN FROM 4 WWAI M24
KjxJx#Uw
(OR ,Wo" THAN 4 S4 W900MM
- - ---------
WATER METER
--NON-RESIDENTIAL
WATER
IMPACT FEE
SEWER
IMPACT FEE
SIZE
ERC RANGE
MIN
MAX
MIN
MAX
OR CCNSD Jr0VlVAl.Kvrl (lbw" ERQ(-tkexe&rWl*xdl--
1
.75
1
0
$2,660
$3,010
$2,926
$6,650
1 $3,311
$7,525
2.5
5.0
$6,916
$13,300
$7,826
$15,050
--
2,6
- - ----------- ------
$23,779
1 7.9
$13,566
$21,014
$15,351
2
5.1
____..-----•-------- __.._4----- .-
.__..- .__.______
1 54.9 $21,280
$146,034
$24,090
$165,249
3
8.0
4 55.0 128.9
$146,300
$342,874
$165,550
5387,989
129,0 357.9
$343,140
1912,111. 4
$388,290
$1,077,279
6
. .....
600.0
$952,280
$1,596,000
51,077,580
L�
51,806,000
8
35&0
ATTACHMENT "B"
RESOLUTION NO, 2011- 41
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF
COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF
THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER SEWER DISTRICT, AMENDING THE
IMPACT FEE RATES ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2007-57.
WHEREAS, on March 13, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) adopted
Ordinance No. 2001 -13, the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, repealing and
superseding all of the County's then existing impact fee regulations, and consolidating all of the
County's impact fee regulations into that one Ordinance, codified in Chapter 74 of the Collier
County Code of Law and Ordinances (Code), and incorporating the water and sewer impact fee
rates established by the adoption of Ordinance No. 98 -69; and
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2001, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2001 -488 thereby
amending Schedule Two of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Code, as amended, the same being
the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance; increasing the Water and Sewer Impact
Fee rates and directing staff to update the Impact Fee after one year; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with that direction, the County has retained Public Resources
Management Group, Inc. (Consultant) to review the existing water and sewer impact fees and to
recommend changes to those fees if appropriate; and
WHEREAS, on February 12, 2002, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2002 -88 to correct
Scrivener's errors, and to correct the water impact fee downward by $50 per Equivalent
Residential Unit (ERC), and to amend Schedule Two of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Code,
as amended, the same being the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance; thereby
increasing the Water and Sewer Impact Fee rates; and
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2006, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2006 -26 amending
Ordinance No. 2001 -13 changing the impact fee rate; and
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2007, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 2007 -57 amending
Ordinance No. 2006 -26 changing the impact fee rate and to include Annual Mid -Cycle water and
sewer impact fee rate indexing; and
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2008, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2008 -202 amending
Ordinance No. 2007 -57 decreasing the water impact fees by $41.49 and wastewater impact fee
by $227.39, for a total reduction of $268.88; and
WHEREAS, the County uses impact fees to supplement the funding of necessary capital
improvements required to provide public facilities to serve new population and related
development that is necessitated by growth in Collier County; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has recommended a water impact fee rate decrease from
$3,575 per ERC to $3,205 per ERC, a decrease of $370 and a sewer impact fee rate decrease
from $3,495 per ERC to $3,220 per ERC, a decrease of $275 for all customer classes based on
their ERC's equivalents; and
ATTACHMENT "B"
WHEREAS, the above recommended rate decrease for water and rate decrease for sewer
establish these rates at the maximum levels allowed in accordance with equity tests established
and existing pursuant to Florida law; and
WHEREAS, staff has thoroughly reviewed the Consultant's findings and
recommendations and staff concurs with the recommended decrease to water and the
recommended decrease to sewer impact fee rate changes, and staff recommends that the Board
adopt this Resolution to implement these recommended changes; and
WHEREAS, the Board finds that it is in the health, safety and welfare of the customers to
accept the recommendations of the Consultant and from staff.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY
OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY WATER SEWER DISTRICT, that:
The Board of County Commissioners hereby declares, after advertised public hearing, that
the water and sewer impact fee rates set forth in the revised Schedule Two of Appendix A of
Ordinance No. 2007 -57, as amended, the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, the
same being Schedule Two of Appendix A of Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Law and
Ordinances, attached hereto, and incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit "A" are fair and
reasonable and are to be assessed to those who receive or will receive benefits from increased
water facilities capacity, increased sewer public facilities capacity, or from both, which increased
capacity is necessitated by increased population and related growth driven development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these revised water and sewer impact fees will take
effect as of 12:01 A.M. on Tuesday, March 1, 2011.
THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote on this the ;224
day of 3.c� -� , 2011.
ATTEST:, OWN) op „ BOARD OF COUNTY , SIQI�E7f1rS�
DWIGHT E: vP,()CKX7 LERK OF COLLIER COUNT ; AWA".. A5
.- THE GOVERNING Bi 7 •COLLIE)
_ COUNTY AND AS ' _OIp : THE
BY GOVERNING BOARD THE GLTsiE'It;�
Att1sC•M W, C , Deputy Clerk COUNTY WATER SEWffk)
and legal suldiefacy:
By. W.
FRED W. COYLE, CHAfldAAN
Jenni B. White
Assistant County Attorney
ATTACHMENT "B"
.. �
f �■
b
i t
�
2
f
§
§
K�
§
$
$
t
�
�
�
b
it
§
!
&
2
§
!
!
I
§
§
§
It
if
us
t
k
§ !
§ f
�
�
§
§
§ �
■
�
2
||
.
i!
° !
s
..|
§
$!
.. �
f �■
ATTACHMENT C
to:
Executive Summary recommending direction to
resolve the outstanding Quincy Square Homeowners
Association discussion topics from the March 27,
2012, meeting, Agenda Item 11 F.
Quincy Square Modeling
Prepared by:
Planning and Project Management Department
Collier County Public Utilities Division
Date:
April 6, 2012
Page 1
Attachment C
Quincy Square Modeling
Below is the Summary of Findings (See pages 2 -9 for supporting documentation):
Based on the modeling and results, Quincy Square receives approximately 38 GPM
(gallons per minute) of additional available capacity associated with a 2" meter as
compared to an 1.5" meter when the 2" meter is connected to an 1.5" residential service
line. This maximum available flowrate is 90% of what would be attained through a 2"
residential service line; therefore, Quincy Square received 90% of the Capacity Benefit of
a 2" meter by using an 1.5" pipe.
Likewise, at peak flow design conditions, Quincy Square 2nd floor units experience
approximately 55.8 PSI (pounds per square inch) of water pressure when connected to an
1.5" residential service line connected to a 2" meter. This pressure is 97% of what would
be attained through a 2" residential service line with a 2" meter; therefore, Quincy Square
received 97% of the Pressure Benefit of a 2" meter by using an 1.5" pipe. The difference
between 55.8 PSI and 57.6 PSI is imperceptible.
Quincy Square received substantial benefit of having 2" meters even though 1.5"
piping was used downstream of the meter. Almost all of the available capacity was
realized, with no perceptible loss of pressure.
BENEFIT SUMMARY
Water Main
Water
Service Line
Residential Service
Capacity
Pressure
(main to
Meter
Size
Line (meter to bldg)
Benefit
Benefit
meter)
2"
2"
1.5" compared
to 2" pipe
90%
97%
2"
1 2"
• The reserved capacity of a 2" meter is between zero and 160 GPM.
• The reserved capacity of an 1.5" meter is between zero and 100 GPM.
• Any ability to receive over 100 GPM with a 2" meter is a benefit over an 1.5"
meter.
Page 2
SUMMARY BY CONFIGURATION AND BUILDING
6
I�lum cr cxf
B�rald'
1� irtg
Atress
C .
A
5
7820 Clemson St.
100%
7821Clemson St.
100%
7827 Clemson St.
100%
7870 Clemson St.
100%
7874 Clemson St.
100%
B
13
7831Clemson St.
90%
7832 Clemson St.
90%
7835 Clemson St,
90%
7836 Clemson St.
90%
7840 Clemson St.
90%
7844 Clemson St.
90%
7848 Clemson St.
90%
7849 Clemson St.
90%
7852 Clemson St.
90%
7856 Clemson St.
90%
7859 Clemson St.
90%
7860 Clemson St.
90%
7865 Clemson St.
90%
Cl
1
7869 Clemson St.
100%
C2
1
7873 Clemson St.
90%
Configuration,
ibmof
BiiWin
Btn *0
Address
C r
P
of 1.5" Mir
D
2
7877 Clemson St.
100 %
7881 Clemson St.
100%
Because worst -case conditions were used for all addresses, some addresses may actually exhibit
greater benefit than was modeled and stated above.
Page 3
Preface:.
The Board requested Staff to determine if Quincy Square benefitted from the use of 2"
water meters where there was an 1.5" residential service line downstream of the meter.
Five original water distribution configurations exist for the 22 buildings at Quincy
Square, labeled A, B, C1, C2, and D. Four variants shown below as Configurations A, B,
C1 and C2 are relevant to the Board's question. Configuration D is not in question
because 1.5" meters have been installed with 1.5" residential service lines in two
buildings since construction. The quantity of buildings with each type of configuration is
also shown below.
Configuration A
Configuration B
2„ 2" 1.5"
Meter To 7 Bldgs
2" 1.5" o 5 Bldgs T
2„
et
Meter
2„ 2„ 1.5„
No Meter —o To 6 Bldgs
Configurations C 1 & C2
Configuration D
2" 2" 2"
To 1 Bldg
Meter
2„ (Config C 1)
2" 1.5" IS,
Meter o To 2 Bldgs
2"' 2" 1.5" To 1 Bldg
Meter (Config C2)
Page 4
Data:
The lengths, diameters, and elevations of pipes used in the model were acquired from
Quincy Square plans dated December 2004. A worst -case scenario for flow restriction
(pressure drop) was created, shown in Table C -1:
CONNECTION DATA
Pipe section
Length
Diameter
Water main to water
50 feet
2"
meter (long side)
Water meter to
backflow preventer
2 feet
See Below
assembly
Meter assembly to
25 feet
1.5"
building
or 2"
Inside building to
69 feet of 1.5"
97 feet
farthest unit garage
and 28 feet of 1"
Garage to 2" floor
10 feet
1"
living space
Table C -I
On March 29, 2012, staff measured the static pressure of the water supply located at
Quincy Square. The measured value of 88 PSI was used as the system pressure for all
model configurations. Hydraulic modeling was conducted in -house using Bentley
Systems WaterGEMS software, version 08.11.03.16.
Water Meter and Backflow Preventer:
1.5" Water Meter 2" Water Meter
Master Meter Co. Elster Amco
Multi Jet C700
Flow rating: 0 —100 GPM Flow rating: 0 — 160 GPM
15" and 2" Backflow Preventer
Wilkins 975 XL
• The reserved capacity of a 2" meter is between zero and 160 GPM.
• The reserved capacity of an 1.5" meter is between zero and 100 GPM.
• Any ability to receive over 100 GPM with a 2" meter is a benefit over an 1.5"
meter.
Page 5
Analysis:
Configuration A
Meter l_ 1 To 5 Bldgs
CONFIGURATION "A" CAPACITY — 5 BUILDINGS
Table C -2
Configurations B, C 1 & C2
211 1 2" 1.5" 2„ 2" 2' To I Bldg
Meter --► To 7 Bldgs
231 Meter (Config C 1)
(Config B) 2"
2" 2" 1.5" 2" 2" 1.5" To 1 Bldg
Meter To 6 Bldgs Meter (Config C2)
After modeling all of the configurations it was determined that the services with "Y"
connections (Configurations B, C1 and C2) represent the worst -case scenarios out of
the five total configurations. In order to determine if Quincy Square benefitted from
the use of 2" water meters with 1.5" pipes, Configurations B and C2 were compared
with C1, the baseline as directed by the Board. The resulting flowrates and pressures
are shown in Tables C -3 and C -4 respectively:
Page 6
Water Main
Residential
Additional
ob
w—
# of
Service Line
Water
Service Line
Flowrate
Capacity
2" Meter
Bldgs
(main to
Meter
(meter to
at
Realized
Capacity
U
meter)
Size
bldg)
Building
Above
Benefit
1.5" meter
A
5
2"
2"
1.5"
160 GPM
60 GPM
100%
Table C -2
Configurations B, C 1 & C2
211 1 2" 1.5" 2„ 2" 2' To I Bldg
Meter --► To 7 Bldgs
231 Meter (Config C 1)
(Config B) 2"
2" 2" 1.5" 2" 2" 1.5" To 1 Bldg
Meter To 6 Bldgs Meter (Config C2)
After modeling all of the configurations it was determined that the services with "Y"
connections (Configurations B, C1 and C2) represent the worst -case scenarios out of
the five total configurations. In order to determine if Quincy Square benefitted from
the use of 2" water meters with 1.5" pipes, Configurations B and C2 were compared
with C1, the baseline as directed by the Board. The resulting flowrates and pressures
are shown in Tables C -3 and C -4 respectively:
Page 6
CONFIGURATIONS "B" & "C" CAPACITY —15 BUILDINGS
Table C -3
CONFIGURATION "B" & "C" PRESSURE —15 BUILDINGS
Water Main
Water
Residential
Peak
Additional
on
w—
# of
Service Line
Water
Service Line
Flowrate
Capacity
2" Meter
a
Bldgs
(main to
Meter
(meter to
at
Realized
Capacity
U
meter)
Size
bldg)
Building
Above
Benefit
D
2
2"
1.5"
1.5"
(1 Building)
1.5" meter
100%
B
13
2"
2"
1.5"
138 GPM
38 GPM
90%
C1
1
2"
2"
2"
154 GPM
54 GPM
Baseline
C2
1
2"
2"
1.5
138 GPM
38 GPM
90%
Table C -3
CONFIGURATION "B" & "C" PRESSURE —15 BUILDINGS
Table C -4
Configuration D
2" � 1.5" 1.5" To 2 Bld s
Meter g
CONFIGURATION "D" CAPACITY — 2 BUILDINGS
Water Main
Water
Residential
Peak
Pressure
on
�.,
# of
Service Line
Water
Service Line
Flowrate
at 2nd
Pressure
o
Bldgs
(main to
Meter
(meter to
for Four
Floor
fi
Benet
U
meter)
Size
bldg)
Units
Living
D
2
2"
1.5"
1.5"
(1 Building)
Space
100%
B
13
2"
2"
1.5"
55.4 GPM
55.8 PSI
97%
C1
1
2"
2"
2"
55.4 GPM
57.6 PSI
Baseline
C2
1
2"
2"
1.5"
55.4 GPM
55.8 PSI
97%
Table C -4
Configuration D
2" � 1.5" 1.5" To 2 Bld s
Meter g
CONFIGURATION "D" CAPACITY — 2 BUILDINGS
Table C -5
Modeling Conditions for Tables C -2 through C -5:
1. 88 PSI static water main pressure
2. Piping connections in Table C -1
3. PVC pipe C- factor of 150
4. Standard atmospheric pressure
5. 20- degrees C water temperature
Page 7
Water Main
Water
Residential
t=
# of
Service Line
Service Line
Flowrate at
Capacity of
Capacity
Bldgs
(main to
SeZer
(meter to
Building
1.5" Meter
Benefit
U
meter)
bldg)
D
2
2"
1.5"
1.5"
100 GPM
100 GPM
100%
Table C -5
Modeling Conditions for Tables C -2 through C -5:
1. 88 PSI static water main pressure
2. Piping connections in Table C -1
3. PVC pipe C- factor of 150
4. Standard atmospheric pressure
5. 20- degrees C water temperature
Page 7
SUMMARY BY CONFIGURATION AND BUILDING
a `
Coa�i il�t
Itlat�1 fib
* , �w
$4
o g
F
alt..
:s
A
5
7820 Clemson St.
100%
782 ] Clemson St.
100%
7827 Clemson St.
100%
7870 Clemson St.
100%
7874 Clemson St.
100%
B
13
7831 Clemson St.
90%
7832 Clemson St.
_
90%
7835 Clemson St,
90%
7836 Clemson St.
90%
7840 Clemson St.
90%
7844 Clemson St.
90%
7848 Clemson St.
90%
7849 Clemson St.
90%
7852 Clemson St.
90%
7856 Clemson St.
90%
7859 Clemson St.
90%
7860 Clemson St.
90%
7865 Clemson St.
90%
C1
1
7869 Clemson St.
100%
C2
1
7873 Clemson St.
90%
Conlz ratZOr►
.91 ,S
1V
1L ,� S e
• v�¢�.iess
Bissldxg
p f 1
Gapcit$+ °r; `.
r'-
D
2
7877 Clemson St.
1000/(
7881 Clemson St.
100%
Table C -6
Because worst -case conditions were used for all addresses, some addresses may actually exhibit
greater benefit than was modeled and stated above.
Page 8
Results /Conclusion (restated):
Based on the modeling and results, Quincy Square receives approximately 38 GPM of
additional available capacity associated with a 2" meter as compared to an 1.5" meter
when the 2" meter is connected to an 1.5" residential service line. This maximum
available flowrate is 90% of what would be attained through a 2" residential service line;
therefore, Quincy Square received 90% of the Capacity Benefit of a 2" meter by using an
1.5" pipe.
Likewise, at peak flow design conditions, Quincy Square 2nd floor units experience
approximately 55.8 PSI of water pressure when connected to an 1.5" residential service
line connected to a 2" meter. This pressure is 97% of what would be attained through a
2" residential service line with a 2" meter; therefore, Quincy Square received 97% of the
Pressure Benefit of a 2" meter by using an 1.5" pipe. The difference between 55.8 PSI
and 57.6 PSI is imperceptible.
Quincy Square received substantial benefit of having 2" meters even though 1.5"
piping was used downstream of the meter. Almost all of the available capacity was
realized, with no perceptible loss of pressure.
BENEFIT SUMMARY
Water Main
Water
Service Line
Residential Service
Capacity
Pressure
(main to
Meter
Line (meter to bldg)
Benefit
Benefit
Size
meter)
2"
2"
1.5" compared to 2"
90%
97%
2)'
Table C -7
Modeling and analysis conducted by the Planning and Project Management Department
Collier County Public Utilities Division:
Mark Sun Principal Project Manager Aaron Cromer, Principal Project Manager
Nathan Beals, Project Manag r, PMP
WaterGEMs Certified Expert Modeler
Water GEMs Certified Expert Modeler
T m Chmelik, Director PPMD, PMP
Page 9