Agenda 03/27/2012 Item #16G43/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the submittal of a grant application in the amount of $800,000
subject to change based on RFP results to the Federal Aviation Administration for the design and
bid of the restoration of Runway 17 -35 at the Marco Island Executive Airport.
OBJECTIVE: To submit a grant application to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for
the design and bid of the restoration of Runway 17 -35 at the Marco Island Executive Airport
(MKY).
CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Airfield Pavement
Inspection conducted in March 2011 concluded that Runway 17 -35 at MKY is in "very poor"
condition. The results of the survey indicated that, on a numerical scale of 0 to 100, the
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) rating of Runway 17 -35 is 31, which represents "very poor"
condition and is below both the FDOT and Federal Aviation Administration General Aviation
Minimum PCI Recommendations.
Based on a pre -grant application submitted in January 2012, the FAA determined that the design
and bid of Runway 17 -35 restoration at MKY is eligible for ninety -five percent (95 %) funding
from the FAA in Fiscal Year 2013. The FAA requested that a grant application based on a
Request for Proposal (RFP) for the design and bid of Runway 17 -35 restoration be submitted in
April 2012.
The total estimated cost for the design and bid of Runway 17 -35 restoration is $800,000. The
actual cost will be included in the application package after the RFPs are evaluated and a fee is
negotiated with the selected engineering consulting firm. Once the RFPs are received, there
likely will not be sufficient time for the grant application to be completed and approved by the
Board before it is due to the FAA.
If awarded a FAA grant, the Authority will request an additional two and one -half percent
(2.5 %) funding from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for this project.
This item will be brought back to the Board to accept the grant if the Airport Authority is offered
the grant.
FISCAL IMPACT: If the grant is awarded and accepted, grant revenue will be recognized in
the Airport Grant Fund (498). The estimated 2.5% local match requirement ($20,000) is
available within the Immokalee Development Center Fund (497) Reserves.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated
with the Board's approval to submit this grant application.
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION: At its March 5, 2012 meeting, the Airport
Authority Advisory Board voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the submittal of a grant application to the FAA for the restoration of
Runway 17 -35 at MKY.
Packet Page -1305-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Executive Summary has been reviewed by the County
Attorney's Office, and has been found legally sufficient for Board action. A majority vote is
required for approval. — STW
RECOMMENDATION: To approve submittal of a grant application in the amount of
$800,000, subject to change based on RFP results, to the Federal Aviation Administration for the
design and bid of the restoration of Runway 17 -35 at the Marco Island Executive Airport, and
authorize the Executive Director of the Airport Authority, Chris Curry, to execute all documents
necessary to submit the grant application.
PREPARED BY: Chris Curry, Executive Director, Airport Authority
Packet Page -1306-
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 16.G.4.
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the submittal of a grant application in the
amount of $800,000 subject to change based on RFP results to the Federal Aviation
Administration for the design and bid of the restoration of Runway 17 -35 at the Marco Island
Executive Airport.
Meeting Date: 3/27/2012
Prepared By
Name: BrueggemanDebra
Title: Operations Coordinator, Airport Authority
3/14/2012 2:50:12 PM
Submitted by
Title: Executive Director - Airport Authority,Airport Authority
Name: CurryChris
3/14/2012 2:50:14 PM
Approved By
Name: CurryChris
Title: Executive Director - Airport Authority,Airport Authority
Date: 3/15/2012 1:03:42 PM
Name: WilliamsSteven
Title: Assistant County Attomey,County Attorney
Date: 3/15/2012 1:22:14 PM
Name: StanleyTherese
Title: Management/Budget Analyst, Senior,Office of Management & Budget
Date: 3/15/2012 4:51:40 PM
Name: WilliamsSteven
Title: Assistant County Attomey,County Attorney
Date: 3/16/2012 8:34:33 AM
Packet Page -1307-
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney
Date: 3/16/2012 3:30:26 PM
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Name: StanleyTherese
Title: Management/Budget Analyst, Senior,Office of Management & Budget
Date: 3/20/2012 9:48:46 AM
Name: UsherSusan
Title: Management/Budget Analyst, Senior,Office of Manage
Date: 3/20/2012 1:21:54 PM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Director -Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs,CMO
Date: 3/20/2012 2:21:17 PM
Packet Page -1308-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
AlRppq*6
Cr 4G� COLLIER COUNTYA/RPORT A UTI-IORI TY
C S 2005 Mainsail Drive Ste. 1
3 P Naples, FL 34914 -8955
WSJ y (239) 642 -7878
v Fax (239) 394 -3515
www.collieraviation.com
January 30, 2012
Mrs. Krystal Ritchey
FAA Airport District Office
5950 Hazeltine National Drive
Suite 400
Orlando, FL 32822
Re: Project Pre - Application
Runway 17 -35 Pavement Restoration Design & Bid
Marco Island Executive Airport
Dear Mrs. Ritchey,
Enclosed is a list of the following:
1. Original and two (2) copies of a Project Application with all the required
attachments for the referenced project.
2. Letter of Credit Method of Payment is requested.
If you have any questions or need any additional information do not hesitate to
call.
Sincerely,
6440
Chris Curry
Executive Director
Copy to: Kristi Smith, FDOT
❑ Marco Island Executive Airport ED Immokalse Regional Airppin Everglades Airpark
2005 Mainsail Drive Ste. 1 165 Airpark Boulavard P O. BQX B&9
Naples, FL 34114 -8955 Immdmlae, FL 34142 650 E.C. Airpark Road
(239)394-S355 (239) 657.90(13 Everoades Gory, FL 34,39
(239) 642 -5427 Fax (239) 657 -9191 Fax (239)695-2T78
(239)695- 355BFax
Packet Page -1309-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
PRE- APPLICATION CHECKLIST
1. AIRPORT: Marco Island Executive Airport (MKY)
LOCATION: Naples, Collier County, FL
DATE OF REQUEST FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE: January 30, 2012
Following items to be completed by sponsor or consultant (If No [N] to any item, explain
the method of resolution on an attachment.
2. Front page SF 424 included?
Yes
3. Cost breakdown included?
Yes
4. Sketch included?
Yes
5. Exhibit "A" (if airport property interests have changed since last
grant)?
N/A
6. Are plans and specifications in accordance with approved
environmental documents?
Yes
7. Is construction cost based on bids or land cost based on appraisals
or actual acquisition cost?
N/A
8. Has the FAA approved the, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
Program
Yes
9. Is all work in the plans and specs requested to be included in the
rant?
Yes
10. Supporting documentation provided if project includes force
account?
N/A
11. Sponsor legally obligated to remove /relocate utility if included in
project?
Yes
12. Letter of Credit payment method requested?
Yes
Packet Page -1310-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
txdrahnn Date* n.irmr m7
Application for Federal Assistance SF -424
'1. Type of Submission:
'2. Type of Application • If Revision, select appropriate letter(s):
® Preapplication
® New
❑ Application
❑ Continuation 'Other (Specify)
❑ Changed/Corrected Application
❑ Revision
`3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier:
5a. Federal Entity Identifier.
`5b. Federal Award Identifier
State Use Only:
6. Date Received by State:
7. State Application Identifier.
8. APPLICANT INFORMATION:
`a. Legal Name: Collier County Board of County Commissioners
'b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN):
'c. Organizational DUNS:
59- 6000558
076997790
d. Address:
'Street 1: 2005 Mainsail Drive, Suite 1
Street 2:
'City: Naples
County: Collier
'State: Florida
Province:
'Country: USA
`Zip / Postal Code 34114
e. Organizational Unit:
Department Name:
Division Name:
Board of County Commissioners
Airport Authority - Marco Island Executive Airport
f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application:
Prefix: Mr. 'First Name: Thomas
Middle Name: Chris
'Last Name: Curry
Suffix:
Title: Executive Director
Organizational Affiliation:
`Telephone Number: (239) 642 -7878 Ext. 35 Fax Number. (239) 394 -3515
'Email: ChrisCurry@colliergov.net
Packet Page -1311-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
�.A,1..Q4W1
Application for Federal Assistance SF -424
*9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type:
B.County Government
Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type:
Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type:
*Other (Specify)
*10. Name of Federal Agency:
Federal Aviation Administration
11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:
20.106
CFDA Title:
Airport Improvement Program
12. Funding Opportunity Number:
Title:
13. Competition Identification Number:
Title:
14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.):
Marco Island Executive Airport, Naples, Collier County, Florida
*15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project:
Runway 17 -35 Pavement Restoration Design & Sid: Develop plans and specifications, bid package and bid the restoration of
Runway 17 -35 and aircraft aprons at the Marco Island Executive Airport. See Attachment 'A".
Packet Page -1312-
FW
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Expiration Date: 03131/2012
Application for Federal Assistance SF -424
16. Congressional Districts Of:
*a. Applicant: 14 *b. Program /Project: 14
Attach an additional list of Program /Project Congressional Districts if needed.
17. Proposed Project:
*a. Start Date: 4/01/12 *b. End Date: 10/01/12
18. Estimated Funding ($ }:
'a. Federal $760,000
*b. Applicant $20,000
*c. State $20,000
*d. Local
'e. Other
*f. Program Income
'g. TOTAL $800,000
*19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process?
❑ a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on
® b. Program is subject to E.O.12372 but has not been selected by the State for review.
❑ c. Program is not covered by E. O. 12372
*20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes ", provide explanation.)
❑ Yes ® No
21. 'By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications ** and (2) that the statements
herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances ** and agree to comply
with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject
me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U. S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001)
® **1 AGREE
*' The list of certifications and assurances, or an Internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or
agency specific instructions.
Authorized Representative:
Prefix: Mr. *First Name: Thomas
Middle Name: Chris
*Last Name: Curry
Suffix:
'Title: Executive Director
*Telephone Number: (239) 642 -7878 Ext. 35
Fax Number: (239) 394 -3515
* Email: ChrisCurry @coliiergov.net
*Signature of Authorized Representative: *Date Signed:
f
Packet Page -1313-
Marco Island Executive Airport
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
RUNWAY 17 -35
ATTACHMENT "A"
Grant Pre - Application
Grant Description
I. Grant Description
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Prepare design plans and specifications, bid documents and bid the restoration of Runway
17 -35 and aircraft apron at the Marco Island Executive Airport.
According to the most recent Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Statewide
Airfield Pavement Inspection, Runway 17 -35 at the Marco Island Executive Airport is in
"very poor" condition, and the aircraft aprons are rated in "fair" condition. The PCI rating
of 31 for Runway 17 -35 is below both the FDOT and Federal Aviation Administration
General Aviation Minimum PCI Ratings. See attached FDOT Statewide Airfield Pavement
Management Program Report for Marco Island Executive Airport dated May 2011.
H. Cost Breakdown
Design and Bid Runway Restoration
GRANT OTHER
COST AMT (95 %) (5 %)
$800,000 $760,000 $40,000
Packet Page -1314-
ro-I
O
rl-
Cl)
O
Ln
ri
uj
ro-I
O
rl-
Cl)
O
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Airport: Marco Island Executive Airport
Detailed Project Description: Runway I7 - -35 Pavement Restoration Design & Bid: Develop
plans and specifications bid package and bid the restoration of Runway 17 -35 at the Marco
Island Executive Airport.
In order for the FAA to determine the appropriate course of action, the FAA must determine
and the sponsor must certify that the proposed action is not likely to:
a. Have an effect on properties protected under Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act
of 1966, as amended, Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, or
Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act;
b. Be highly controversial on environmental grounds. A proposed Federal action is
considered highly controversial when the action is opposed by a Federal, state or local
government agency or by a substantial number of persons affected by such action on
environmental grounds;
c. Have a significant impact on natural, ecological, cultural, or scenic resources of national,
state, or local significance, including endangered species, wetland, floodplains, coastal
zones, prime or unique farmland, energy supply and natural resources, or resources
protected by the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act;
d. Be highly controversial with respect to the availability of adequate relocation housing. In
an action involving relocation of persons or businesses, a controversy over the amount of
the acquisition or relocation payments is not considered to be a controversy with respect
to the availability of adequate relocation housing;
e. Cause substantial division or disruption of an established community, or disrupt orderly,
planned development, or is likely to be not reasonably consistent with plans or goals that
have been adopted by the community in which the project is located;
f. Have a significant environmental impact on minority or low- income populations;
g. Cause a significant increase in surface traffic congestion;
h. Have a significant impact on noise levels of noise sensitive areas;
i. Have a significant impact on water quality or contaminate a public water supply system;
j. Have a significant impact on air quality or violate the local, state or Federal standards of
air quality;
k. Be inconsistent with any Federal, state, or local law or administrative determination
relating to the environment.
Based on the attached Environmental Determination Checklist, I certify that the project(s)
described above meet(s) the test for a Categorical Exclusion in accordance with FAA Order
5050.4A and paragraphs a thru k above.
644t� G� 3o %z
Signature of Author&d Airport Representative Date
FAA Determination (by Program Man ager/Environmental Specialist signature):
Categorically Excluded: Date
Requires Further Environmental Analysis: Date
Packet Page -1316-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION CHECKLIST
Airport:—Marco Island Executive Airport
Detailed description of Proposed Project: (attach drawing) Runway 17 -35 Pavement
Restoration Desibn & Bid: Develop plans and specifications bid package and bid the
Prepared and certified by: L.ZZ�UZ� (. i�L.t I Date: _January 30_, 2012
Attach detailed comments for all "yes" answers on a separate sheet, and explain your
justification for a request for a determination of Categorical Exclusion.
Packet Page -1317-
YES
NO
COMMENTS
IS THIS PROPOSED PROJECT LISTED AS
CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED IN FAA
ORDER 5050AA?
THIS PROPOSED PROJECT CONSISTS OF:
First Time ALP Approval
X
Commercial Service Airport Location Approval
X
New Air Carrier Runway
X
New Airport Location
X
New Runway
X
Runway Extension
X
Runway Strengthening w/ 1.5 DNL Increase
X
Construction or Relocation of a Roadway
X
Land Acquisition
X
ILS or ALS
X
THIS PROPOSED PROJECT WILL
AFFECT:
Section 4(f) Land
X
Historic/Archaeological Resources
X
Farmland
X
Wetlands
X
Flood lain
X
Coastal Zone
X
Endangered or Threatened Species
X
THIS PROPOSED PROJECT IS LIKELY TO:
Be Highly Controversial on Environmental
Grounds
X
Cause Natural Resource Impacts
X
Be Controversial Regarding Relocation Housing
X
Cause Communit y Disruption
X
Cause Surface Traffic Congestion
X
Cause Increase of 1.5 DNL over Noise Sensitive
Areas
X
Cause an Effect on Air Quality
X
Cause an Effect on Water Quality
X
Cause Environmental Justice Concerns
X
Contain or Affect Hazardous Materials
X
Be Inconsistent with Other Environmental Laws
X
Attach detailed comments for all "yes" answers on a separate sheet, and explain your
justification for a request for a determination of Categorical Exclusion.
Packet Page -1317-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
PROJECT: PAVEMENT REHABILITATION R UNWA Y 17 -35
AIRPORT: MARCO ISLAND EXECUTIVE AIRPORT
1. Objectives:
Prepare design plans and specifications, bid documents and bid the restoration of
Runway 17 -35 at the Marco Island Executive Airport.
2. Anticipated Benefits:
Significantly enhance safety by rehabilitating paved runway surfaces currently rated as
being in very poor condition, and aircraft apron surfaces currently rated as being in
fair condition by the Florida Department of Transportation Aviation Office.
3. Approach:
Consultants' and contractors' means and methods using standard design and
construction practices.
4. Geographic Location:
This project is for the Marco Island Executive Airport, located at 2005 Mainsail Drive,
Naples, Collier County, Florida.
5. Sponsor's Representative:
Chris Curry, Executive Director, Collier County Airport Authority
Packet Page -1318-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AVIATION OFFICE
Statewide Airfield Pavement
Management Program
Marco Island Executive Airport— MKY
(General Aviation)
Naples, Florida
(District 1)
May 2011
Packet Page -1319-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE NO.
ExecutiveSummary ...............................................................................
............................... iu
1.
Introduction .....................................................................................
............................... l
2.
Network Definition and Pavement Inventory .................................
.............................10
3.
Pavement Condition ........................................................................
.............................14
4.
Pavement Condition Prediction ......................................................
.............................20
5.
Maintenance Policies and costs ......................................................
.............................21
6.
Pavement Rehabilitation Needs Analysis .......................................
.............................27
7.
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan ............................................. .............................31
8.
Visual Aids ......................................................................................
.............................33
9.
Recommendations ........................................................................... .............................34
LIST OF FIGURES
Fimire 1 -1 - Pavement Life Cvcle .............................................................. ..............................4
Figure1 -2: PCI Rating Scale .................................................................... ..............................6
Figure 2 -l: Pavement Area by Surface Type ........................................... .............................12
Figure 3 -1: Network PCI Distribution by Rating Category ..................... .............................16
Figure 3 -1 a: Condition Rating Summary ................................................. .............................16
Figure 3 -2: Percentage of Pavement Area within Each PCI Range by Pavement Use ........ 17
Figure 4 -1: Predicted PCI by Pavement Use ........................................... .............................20
Figure 6 -1: Budget Scenario Analysis ..................................................... .............................30
LIST OF TABLES:
Table I: Condition Summary by Branch ................................................ ............................... iii
Table II: Condition Summary by Pavement Use ................................... ............................... iv
Table III: Condition Summary by Pavement Rank ................................ ............................... iv
Table IV: Immediate Major M &R Needs .............................................. ............................... iv
Table V: 10 -Year M &R Costs under Unlimited Funding Scenario ......... ..............................v
Table 1 -1: Sampling Rate for FDOT Condition Surveys ......................... ..............................5
Table 2 -1: Construction Since Last Inspection & Anticipated Construction Activity .........11
Table 2 -2: Pavement Area by Pavement Use .......................................... .............................11
Table 2 -3: Branch and Section Inventory ................................................ .............................13
Table 3 -1: Pavement Distresses for Asphalt Concrete Surfaces .............. .............................14
Table 3 -2: Pavement Distresses for Portland Cement Concrete Surfaces ............................15
Table 3 -3: Condition by Pavement Use ................................................... .............................17
Table 5 -1: Routine Maintenance Activities for Airfield Pavements ....... .............................22
Table 5 -2: Critical PCI for General Aviation Airports ............................ .............................23
Table 5 -3: FDOT Minimum Service Level PCI for General Aviation Airports ...................23
Table 5 -4: M &R Activities for General Aviation Airports ..................... .............................24
Table 5 -5: Maintenance Unit Costs for FDOT ........................................ .............................25
Table 5 -6: M &R Activities and Unit Costs by Condition for General Aviation Airports ... 26
Table 6 -1: Summary of Immediate Major M &R Needs Option No. 1 .... .............................27
Packet Page -1320-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE NO.
Table 6 -2: Summary of Immediate Major M &R Needs Option No. 2 .... .............................28
Table 6 -3: Summary of Year 1 Maintenance Activities .......................... .............................29
Table 7 -1: M &R Costs under Unlimited Funding Scenario .................... .............................31
APPENDICES
Appendix A Network Definition Map
Packet Page -1321-
System Inventory Map
Pavement Inventory Table
Work History Report
Appendix B
2011 Condition Map
Pavement Condition Index Table
Appendix C
Branch Condition Report
Section Condition Report
Appendix D
Pavement Condition Prediction Table
Predicted PCI by Pavement Use Graph
Appendix E
Year 1 Maintenance Activities Table
Appendix F
Major M &R Plan by Year under Unlimited Funding Scenario Table
Appendix G
10 -Year M &R Map
Appendix H
Photographs
Appendix I
PCI Re- inspection Report
Packet Page -1321-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Air port
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2010, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Aviation Office selected a Consultant
team consisting of Kimley -Horn and Associates and their Subconsultants, MACTEC
Engineering and Consulting and All About Pavements, Inc., to provide services in support of
FDOT in the continuing evaluation and updating of the existing Statewide Airfield Pavement
Management Program ( SAPMP) to be completed over fiscal years 2011 and 2012.
The tasks required to achieve this objective at Marco Island Executive Airport included:
➢ Obtain recent construction history from the Airport to update the Pavement Inventory
CADD drawings from the previous SAPMP update,
➢ Perform a visual Pavement Condition Index (PCI) survey of the airfield pavements at
the Airport,
➢ Update the MicroPAVER database to analyze the PCI field data and determine the
current condition of the airfield pavements,
➢ Predict the future deterioration of the pavements,
➢ Develop a 10 -year M &R plan to address the pavement needs at Marco Island Executive
Airport, and
➢ Provide the estimated costs associated with the suggested immediate and future M &R
activities
During March 2011, the PCI survey was performed at Marco Island Executive Airport. The
results of the survey indicate that, based on a numerical scale of 0 to 100, the overall area -
weighted average PCI of the airfield pavements in 2011 is 40, representing a Very Poor overall
network condition.
Table I below summarizes the overall condition summary by network branch.
Table I: Condition Summary by Branch
Tables II and III below illustrate the area- weighted PCI computed individually for each
pavement use and rank, respectively.
iii
Packet Page -1322-
Area
Condition
FDOT
MicroPAVER
Action
Branch Name
Weighted
Rating
Minimum
Minimum
Required
PCI
Service Level
PCI
North Apron
56
Fair
60
65
X
NW Apron
67
Fair
60
65
Apron Turnaround RW 35
45
Poor
60
65
X
Runway 17 -35
31
Very Poor
75
65
X
Connector Taxiway
21
Serious
65
65
1 X
Tables II and III below illustrate the area- weighted PCI computed individually for each
pavement use and rank, respectively.
iii
Packet Page -1322-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table II: Condition Summary by Pavement Use
Use
Average Area-
Weighted PCI
Condition Rating
Runway
31
Very Poor
Taxiway
21
Serious
Apron
57
Fair
All (Wei hted)
40
Very Poor
Table III: Condition Summary by Pavement Rank
Rank*
Average Area-
Weighted PCI
Condition Rating
Primary
40
Very Poor
All (Weighted)
40
L Very Poor
*The pavement rank for the airport pavement network is listed on Table 2 -3.
The immediate M &R needs, or needs that have been programmed to be completed in the first
year of the 10 -year M &R plan based on an unlimited budget at Marco Island Executive Airport,
include: North Apron, Northwest Apron, Apron Turnaround RW 35, Runway 17 -35, and
Taxiway Connector. The extent of the distresses located throughout the apron pavements listed
above justify mill and overlay rehabilitation activity. The runway and taxiway connector
pavement distresses justify full pavement reconstruction. The immediate needs are summarized
in Table IV below.
Table IV: Immediate Major M &R Needs
Branch Name
Section
ID
Surface
Type
Section
Area (ft2)
Major M &R
Costs*
PCI
Before
Activity
PCI After
M &R
North Apron
4205
AC
211,940
$1,333,102.70
47
Mill and Overlay
100
NW Apron
4105
AC
29,220
$183,793.81
47
Mill and Overlay
100
Apron Turnaround RW 35
5105
AC
30,355
$190,932.97
45
Mill and Overlay
100
Runway 17 -35
6105
AC
100,000
$1,288,700.37
31
Reconstruction
100
Runway 17 -35
6110
AC
300,000
$4,086,001.33
29
Reconstruction
100
Runway 17 -35
6115
AC
100,000
$995,500.25
35
Reconstruction
100
Connector Taxiway
105
PCC
7,880
$107,325.63
20
Reconstruction
100
Total
$8,185,357.06
36 1
100
* Costs are adjusted for inflation.
iv
Packet Page -1323-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
A forecast of Major M &R needs for a 10 -year period, starting from 2011, was developed using
an unlimited budget. The analysis identified ongoing maintenance needs and major M &R during
that interval. The results of this analysis are provided in Table V below.
Table V: 10 -Year M &R Costs under Unlimited Funding Scenario
Year
Preventative
Major M &R
Total Year Cost
2011
$566.78
$8,185,357.06
$8,185,923.84
2012
$679.30
$0.00
$679.30
2013
$1,872.95
$0.00
$1,872.95
2014
$2,950.33
$0.00
$2,950.33
2015
$4,283.56
$0.00
$4,283.56
2016
$5,714.21
$0.00
$5,714.21
2017
$7,846.50
$0.00
$7,846.50
2018
$9,921.25
$0.00
$9,921.25
2019
$30,360.44
$0.00
$30,360.44
2020
$41,840.20
$0.00
$41,840.20
Total
$106,035.52
$8,185,357.06
$8,291,392.58
Npte: Costs are adjusted for inflation.
The implementation of the 10 -Year major M &R plan is expected to provide an improvement in
the overall condition of the airfield pavement, where the area- weighted PCI would increase from
40 in 2011 to 86 in 2020. Appendix F lists the major M &R for the 10 -Year program. Appendix
G graphically depicts the activity.
It is important to note that although preventative and some major M &R activities would have to
be conducted over several years, the area- weighted PCI value for all Marco Island Executive
Airport pavements in 2020 may remain near 86. The airport manager should realize that what is
most important is that the pavement repair work (preventative and major M &R) that has been
identified for Marco Island Executive Airport is conducted at some point in the 10 -year plan.
Packet Page -1324-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
1. INTRODUCTION
The State of Florida has more than 100 public airports that are vital to the Florida economy as
well as the economy of the United States. There are millions of square yards of pavement for the
runways, taxiways, aprons and other areas of these airports that support aircraft operations. The
timely and proper maintenance and rehabilitation (M &R) of these pavements allows the airports
to operate efficiently, economically and without excessive down time.
In order to support the planning, scheduling, and design of the M &R activities based on
pavement evaluation and pavement management performance trends, the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) Aviation Office implemented the Statewide Airfield Pavement
Management Program (SAPMP) in 1992.
In 2010, the FDOT Aviation Office selected a Consultant team consisting of Kimley -Horn and
Associates and their Subconsultants, MACTEC Engineering and Consulting and All About
Pavements, Inc., to provide services in support of FDOT in the continuing evaluation and
updating of the existing SAPMP to be completed over fiscal years 2011 and 2012.
This report discusses the work performed, a summary of the findings, results, and
recommendations for M &R planning associated with the update to the SAPMP. It also describes
the procedures used to ensure that the appropriate engineering and scientific standards of care,
quality, budget, and schedule requirements are implemented during the performance of the
SAPMP.
1.1 Purpose
This Florida Airport Pavement Evaluation Report is intended to:
• Describe, briefly, the SAPMP and the roles and responsibilities of the program's
participants;
• Provide background information on pavement management principles, objectives, and
benefits to this airport;
• Outline the procedures used to collect, evaluate and report pavement inspection
results at this airport;
• Present the findings from the pavement inspection;
• Analyze and discuss the needs for Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M &R) activities
and associated costs for this airport.
1.2 FDOT Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
In 1992, the FDOT implemented the SAPMP to improve the knowledge of pavement conditions
at public airports in the State system, identify maintenance needs at individual airports, automate
information management, and establish standards to address future needs. The 1992 SAPMP
provided valuable information for establishing and performing pavement M &R.
In 1992/1993, and 1998/1999, the FDOT Aviation Office participated in the development of a
proprietary software pavement management system and developed and populated a pavement
management database that provided valuable information for establishing M &R policies,
estimating M &R costs, and developing recommendations for performing routine pavement
maintenance. This system, AIRPAV, was implemented, and initial condition surveys were
1
Packet Page -1325-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Air port
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
performed in 1992 and 1993. The SAPMP was updated with additional surveys in 1998 and
1999.
In 2004, the FDOT Aviation Office undertook a project to update the pavement management
system software utilized for the SAPMP. This project involved a review of the AIRPAV
software and other available pavement management system software. As a result of this review,
MicroPAVER was selected as the software for the update project. Data from the 1998/1999
condition surveys were converted to the MicroPAVER system, and the inventory of the
pavement systems and drawings of the pavements were updated to reflect maintenance,
rehabilitation, and construction activities since 1998/1999. The pavements were inspected
between 2006 and 2008, and an updated M &R program was developed based on the new
condition of the airfield pavements. As part of the update, procedures for the inspection and
collection of pavement data were developed, and a website (www.floridaairportpavement.com)
was created for the input of data under secure procedures.
Currently, airports using the AIP Grant Program are required by the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) to develop a pavement maintenance program (FAA/AC 150/5380 -6B
"Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements ") using trained personnel to
perform a detailed inspection of airfield pavements. The inspections are required to be
performed at least once a year or every 3 years if pavement inspection is characterized in the
form of a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) survey (such as ASTM D 5340 "Standard Test
Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys ", (2004 edition)). The 2004 edition was
utilized in lieu of the 2010 edition to maintain database integrity and benefit of pavement
performance curves from the previous inspections.
In 2010, the FDOT Aviation Office selected a team consisting of the Consultant and their
Subconsultants to provided services in support of FDOT in the continuing evaluation and
updating of the existing SAPMP to be completed over fiscal years 2011 and 2012.
1.3 Organization
1.3.1 Aviation Office Program Manager Role
The Aviation Office Airport Engineering Manager serves as the Aviation Office Program
Manager (AO -PM) monitoring the work of the Consultant. The AO -PM has review and approval
authority for each program task and also manages the day -to -day details of the SAPMP and the
updates.
1.3.2 Consultant Role
The Consultant (Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.) and their Subconsultants (MACTEC
Engineering and Consulting and All About Pavements, Inc.) provide technical and administrative
assistance to the AO -PM during the execution of this program, which involves the continuing
evaluation of airport pavements and updating of the SAPMP based upon procedures outlined in
FAA Advisory Circular 150/5380 -613 "Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport
Pavements" and ASTM D 5340 "Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index
Surveys" (2004).
2
Packet Page -1326-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
1.3.3 Airport Role
The airports are the ultimate client for each of the field inspections and reports. Individual
airports will be provided final deliverables prepared by the Consultant that have been reviewed
and approved by the AO -PM. The airport should provide a current Airport Layout Plan (ALP) to
the Consultant and, if they participated in the previous SAPMP update, indicate any construction
activity that has been performed since the previous inspections.
1.4 Pavement Types and Pavement Management
1.4.1 Pavement basics
A pavement is a prepared surface designed to provide a continuous smooth ride at a certain speed
and to support an estimated amount of traffic for a certain number of years. Pavements are
constructed of a combination of subgrade soils, subbases, bases and surfacing. There are mainly
two types of pavements;
• Flexible pavement, composed of an asphalt concrete (AC) surface, and
• Rigid pavement composed of a Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) surface.
Both pavement types use a combination of layered materials and thicknesses in order to support
the traffic loads and protect the underlying natural subgrade soil. Flexible pavements (AC)
dissipate the load from layer to layer until the load magnitude is small enough to be supported by
the subgrade soil. In rigid pavements (PCC), the Portland Cement Concrete supports most of the
load, and the base or subbase layer is mainly constructed to provide a smooth and continuous
platform for the construction of the concrete surface.
A small percentage of the airport pavements in Florida are composed of asphalt concrete surface
over Portland Cement Concrete (APC). This pavement type is known as "composite" pavement.
Due to the different nature of the pavement types and their materials, flexible and rigid
pavements have different distresses and failure mechanisms. Understanding the mechanics and
failure modes of both pavement types will assist engineers in making adequate and long lasting
repairs or rehabilitation to the pavement structures.
1.4.2 Pavement Management System Concept
The SAPMP utilized a Pavement Management System (PMS) to develop the M &R
recommendations discussed in this report. A PMS is a tool to assist engineers, planners and
managing agencies in making decisions when planning pavement M &R. The management of
pavements involves scheduling pavement maintenance and rehabilitation before pavements
deteriorate to a condition where reconstruction (the most expensive alternative) is the only
solution. Figure 1 -1 below, taken from FAA/AC 5380 -7A "Airport Pavement Management
Program ", illustrates how a pavement generally deteriorates and the relative cost of rehabilitation
at various times throughout its life. Note that during the first 75 percent of a pavement's life, it
performs relatively well. After that, however, it begins to deteriorate rapidly. The number of
years a pavement stays in "good" condition depends on how well it is maintained. As the
illustration demonstrates, the cost of maintaining the pavement above a critical condition before
rapid deterioration occurs is much less compared to maintaining pavements after substantial
deterioration has occurred.
3
Packet Page -1327-
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Figure 1 -1: Pavement Life Cycle
GOOD
SATISFACTORY
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
$1.00 FOR
FAIR REHABILIATION
i HERE
POOR
SIGNIFICANT DROP
VERY POOR IN CONDITION r WILL COST
�l TO $10.00*
HERE
SERIOUS 1 SMALL %
PAVEMENT LIFE
FAILED
TIME
Source: FAA /AC 15015380 -7A "Airport Pavement Management Program "
*Modifted to reflect current construction costs.
Pavements deteriorate at an accelerated rate with increasing traffic and limited M &R resources.
Planned maintenance and rehabilitation, essentially preventing pavements from reaching
deteriorated conditions, helps managers /owners /agencies maximize the use of their budgets and
prolong the life of the pavements. A PMS provides a tool to schedule and plan maintenance and
rehabilitation based on engineering information and existing and predicted conditions of
pavements.
There are several components or elements that are essential to a PMS. The first steps in the
implementation of a PMS are to know and clearly identify what needs to be managed, the limits
of the managing agency's responsibilities and the condition of the existing pavements. Once the
cause and the extent of pavement problems are known, the appropriate maintenance and/or
rehabilitation can be planned. By using local unit costs and expected yearly budgets, a multi-
year M &R plan can be determined.
1.4.3 Pavement Inspection Methodology for the SAPMP
Pavement condition assessment is one of the primary decision variables in any airport PMS.
Pavement condition assessments generally include visual surveys in accordance with ASTM D
5340, "Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys" and structural
evaluation. Pavement condition surveys assess the functional condition of the pavement surface.
Typically, most problems within a pavement structure will eventually reflect to the pavement
surface. The structural condition and relative support of the pavement layers can be assessed
utilizing non - destructive deflection testing (NDT) as well as other in -depth engineering
evaluation or sampling and testing methods.
4
Packet Page -1328-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
For the Statewide Aviation Pavement Management Program update, only visual surveys were
performed. Further structural and geotechnical testing should be conducted to determine the
appropriate rehabilitation methods during the design process.
In preparation of the PCI surveys, the airfield pavements are divided into sample units as
established in FAA AC 150/5380 -6B and ASTM D 5340. Further discussion of how the airport
pavements are divided and subdivided into units by construction and use can be found in Section
2 "Network Definition and Pavement Inventory" of this report.
Sample unit sizes are approximately 5000 t 2000 square feet for AC- surfaced pavements and 20
± 8 slabs for PCC- surfaced pavements. Prior to conducting the field inspections, the sampling
plan was developed based on previous sampling and modified based on the available knowledge
of Branches, Sections, use patterns, construction types and history. The sampling rate used for
the FDOT Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program is provided in Table 1 -1 below.
Table 1 -1: Sampling Rate for FDOT Condition Surveys
AC Pavements
PCC Pavements
N
n
N
n
Runwal
Others
Runwal
Others
1 -4
1
1
1 -3
1
1
5 -10
2
1
4 -6
2
1
11 -15
3
2
7 -10
3
2
16 -30
5
3
11 -15
4
2
31 -40
7
4
16 -20
5
3
41 -50
8
5
21 -30
7
3
>51
20% but <20
10% but <10
31 -40
8
4
41 -50
10
5
>51
20% but <20
10% but <10
Where N = total number of sample units in Section
n = number ofsample units to inspect
The sample units to inspect are determined by a systematic random sampling technique. This
means that the locations are determined such that they are distributed evenly throughout the
Section. In the case when nonrepresentive distresses are observed in the field, additional sample
units were added.
The distress quantities and severity levels from the sample units are used to compute the PCI
value for each Section. PCI values range from 0 to 100. As Figure 1 -2 below indicates,
MicroPAVER provides a rating scale that relates PCI to pavement condition. A PCI between 0
and 10 is considered `Failed' pavement, and a PCI between 86 and 100 is considered `Good'
pavement, with five other conditions for PCI values between 11 and 85.
5
Packet Page -1329-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Figure 1 -2: PCI Rating Scale
PCI
Condition Rating
86-100
Good
71-85
Satisfactory
56-70
Fair
41-55
Poor
26-40
Very Poor
11-25
Serious
0-10
Failed
1.5 Definitions
Aviation Office - The Aviation Office is charged with responsibility for promoting the safe
development of aviation to serve the people of the State of Florida. The Aviation Office Program
Manager (AO -PM) has review and approval authority for each program task of the SAPMP.
Base Course - Base Course is a layer of manufactured material, usually crushed rock (aggregate)
or stabilized material (asphalt or concrete or Florida Limerock), immediately beneath the surface
course of a pavement, which provides support to the surface course.
Branch - A Branch designates pavements that have common usage and functionality, such as an
entire runway, taxiway, or apron.
Branch ID - A short form identification for the pavement Branch. In this report, Branch includes
the common designation for the item e.g. RW 18 -36.
Category - The Category classifies the airport according to the type and volume of aircraft
traffic, as follows:
• GA — for general aviation or community airports;
• RL — for regional relievers or small hubs;
• PR — for primary (certified under Part 139 requirements).
Critical PCI - The PCI value considered to be the threshold for M &R decisions. PCI above the
Critical generate economical activities expected to preserve and prolong acceptable condition.
M &R for PCI values less than Critical make sense only for reasons of safety or to maintain a
pavement in operable condition. A pavement section is expected to deteriorate very quickly
once it reaches the Critical PCI and the unit cost of repair increases significantly.
Distress Type - A distress type is a defined visible defect in pavement evidenced by cracking,
vertical displacement or deterioration of material. In PCI technology, 16 distinct distress types
for asphalt surfaced and 15 for Portland Cement Concrete surfaced pavements have been
described and rated according to the impact their presence has on pavement condition.
w
6
Packet Page -1330-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Florida DOT (FDOT) - Florida Department of Transportation was represented in this project by
the Office of Aviation.
Global M &R - Global M &R is defined as activities applied to entire pavement Sections with the
primary objective of slowing the rate of deterioration. These activities are primary for asphalt
surfaced pavements, e.g. surface treatments.
Localized M &R (Maintenance and Repair) - Localized M &R is a temporizing activity performed
on existing pavement to extend its serviceability and/or to improve rideability. Localized M &R
can be applied either as a safety (stop -gap) measure or preventive measure. Common localized
maintenance methods include crack sealing, joint sealing, and patching.
Major M &R (e.g. Rehabilitation) - Activities performed over the entire area of a pavement
Section that are intended to restore and/or maintain serviceability. This includes asphalt
overlays, milling and replacing asphalt pavement, reconstruction with asphalt, reconstruction
with Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavements, and PCC overlays.
MicroPAVER - A commercially available software subsidized by FAA and agencies in the US
Department of Defense developed to support engineered management of pavement assets using a
condition based approach. This software has the functionality such that, if properly
implemented, maintained, and operated, it meets the pavement management program
requirements described by the FAA in Advisory Circular 150/5380 -7A.
Minimum Condition Level - A threshold PCI value established by FDOT to represent the
targeted minimum pavement condition that is desirable in the Florida Airport System. These
values were established with consideration of pavement function and airport type. For instance,
runways have higher minimum condition levels than aprons, and Primary airports have higher
minimum condition levels than General Aviation airports.
Network Definition - A Network Definition is a Computer -Aided Drafting & Design (CADD)
drawing which shows the airport pavement outline with Branch and Section boundaries. This
drawing also includes the PCI sample units and is used to identify those sample units to be
surveyed, i.e. the sampling plan. The Network Definition for the airport is in Appendix A along
with a table of inventory data.
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) - The Pavement Condition Index is a number which represents
the condition of a pavement segment at a specific point in time. It is based on visual
identification and measurement of specific distress types commonly found in pavement which
has been in service for a period of time. The definitions and procedures for determining the PCI
are found in ASTM D 5340, published by ASTM International.
Pavement Evaluation - A systematic approach undertaken by trained and experienced personnel
intended for determination of the condition, serviceability, and best corrective action for
pavement. Techniques to standardize pavement evaluation include the Pavement Condition
Index procedures.
Pavement Management System (PMS) - A Pavement Management System is a broad function
that uses pavement evaluation and pavement performance trends as a basis for planning,
programming, financing, and maintaining a pavement system.
7
Packet Page -1331-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Pavement Surface Type - The surface of pavement is identified as one of four types:
• AC — for asphalt surface pavements;
• PCC — for Portland Cement Concrete pavements;
• AAC — for asphalt surface pavements that have had an asphalt overlay at some point
in their construction history;
APC — for composite pavements, which consist of asphalt over Portland Cement
Concrete pavement.
• PAC — for composite pavements, which consist of Portland Cement Concrete over
asphalt pavement.
Rank - Pavement rank in MicroPAVER determines the priority to be assigned to a pavement
Section when developing an M &R plan. Pavement Sections are ranked as follows according to
their use:
• P — for Primary pavements, such as primary runways, primary taxiways, and primary
aprons;
• S — or Secondary pavements, such as secondary runways, secondary taxiways, and
secondary aprons;
• T — for Tertiary pavements such as "T" hangars and slightly used aprons.
Reconstruction - Reconstruction includes removal of existing pavement, preparation of subgrade,
and construction of new pavement with new or recycled materials. Reconstruction is indicated
when distress types evident at the surface indicate failure in the pavement structure or subgrade
of a type, and to an extent, not correctable by less extensive construction.
Rehabilitation - Rehabilitation represents construction using existing pavement for a foundation.
Rehabilitation most commonly consists of an overlay of existing pavement with a new asphalt or
concrete surface. Recently, technology has expanded the options to include recycling of existing
pavement and incorporating engineering fabrics or thin layers of elasticized materials to retard
reflection of distress types through the new surface.
Sample Unit - Uniformly sized portions of a Section as defined in ASTM D 5340. Sample units
are a means to reduce the total amount of pavement actually surveyed using statistics to select
and survey enough area to provide a representative measure of Section PCI. Sample Unit sizes
are 5,000 ± 2,000 square feet for AC- surfaced pavements and 20 t 8 slabs for PCC- surfaced
pavements.
Section - Sections subdivide Branches into portions of similar pavement. Sections are prescribed
by pavement structure, age, condition, and use. Sections are identified on the airport Network
Definition. They are the smallest unit used for determining M &R requirements based on
condition.
Section ID - A short form identification for the pavement Section that maintains the original
AirPAV identification where 100 series through 3000 series Sections are taxiways, 4000 and
5000 series Sections are aprons (the 5000 series represent run -up aprons and turnarounds), and
6000 series Sections are runways.
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program (SAPMP) — The Statewide Airfield
Pavement Management Program is a program implemented in 1992 by the Florida Department
of Transportation to plan, schedule, and design the maintenance and rehabilitation activities
8
Packet Page -1332-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
necessary for the airfield pavement on Florida's public airports to allow the airports to operate
efficiently, economically, and without excessive down time.
System Inventory - A System Inventory is a Computer -Aided Drafting & Design (CADD)
drawing which shows the airport pavement outline and identifies airfield construction activities
since the last inspection. The System Inventory for the airport is included in Appendix A.
Use - In MicroPAVER, Use is the term for the function of the pavement area. This is either
Runway, Taxiway, or Apron for purposes of the FDOT Statewide Aviation Pavement
Management System.
Packet Page -1333-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
2. NETWORK DEFINITION AND PAVEMENT INVENTORY
Marco Island Executive Airport (MKY) consists of a single runway; RW 17 -35, which is 100 -ft
wide by 5,000 -ft long. Construction is planned to begin within the month of April for a parallel
taxiway which will run along the west side of RW 17 -35. Currently the airport has multiple
hangar facilities and tie -down spaces located throughout the apron, which was recently expanded
in 2010. With exception to the one Portland Cement Concrete ramp connector, all of the
pavement throughout the airport is constructed of Asphalt Concrete.
It is important to note that the aforementioned runway data in addition to the remaining airfield
pavement facilities geometric dimensions may vary slightly from the geometry used in the
condition and M &R analysis based on field measurements.
Marco Island Executive Airport is publicly owned and operated by Collier County. This airport
is designated as a General Aviation airport and is located in District 1 of the Florida Department
of Transportation.
2.1 Network Definition
The pavements within the network are defined in MicroPAVER in terms of manageable units
that help to organize the data into similar groups. An organizational hierarchy is used to
establish these units.
2.1.1 Branch Section Identification
The airport pavement network is subdivided into separate Branches (runways, taxiways, or
aprons) that have distinctly different uses. Branches are then further divided into Sections with
similar pavement construction and performance that may share other common attributes.
Sections are manageable units used to organize the data collection and are treated individually
during the rehabilitation planning stage. A pavement rank, consisting of primary, secondary, and
tertiary levels, is assigned to each Section based on their level and type of use. The pavement
rankings that were designated for each Section in the previous SAPMP update were again used
for this update.
As discussed in Section 1.4.3 "Pavement Inspection Methodology for the SAPMP", the sections
are sub - divided into sample units, which are the smallest subdivision in a pavement network,
only for the purpose of conducting the pavement condition survey.
2.1.2 System Inventory and Network Definition Update
The System Inventory and Network Definition drawings are used to identify changes in the
network since the most recent update from the 2006/2008 inspections and also to plan the field
inspection activities for the 2011 survey. Prior to the field inspection process, the System
Inventory drawing was updated from the previous inspection with notes indicating recent
construction projects on the various Sections of pavement throughout the airfield. This System
Inventory drawing is used to update the Network Definition drawing.
The Network Definition drawing shows the airport pavement outline with Branch and Section
boundaries. This drawing also includes the PCI sample units and is used to identify those sample
10
Packet Page -1334-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
units to be surveyed, i.e. the sampling plan. The previous airport configuration and history was
compared with the current airport configuration, and the existing network branch, section and
sample unit designations were revised to match the current configuration. This drawing serves
not only as a primary guide for the airfield inspectors but also as an important historical record.
The updated System Inventory and Network Definition drawings for Marco Island Executive
Airport are provided in Appendix A. Table 2 -1 below lists the recent construction projects at the
airport.
Table 2 -1: Construction Since Last Inspection & Anticipated Construction
Activity
Construction
Area (ft)
% of Total Area
Year
Location
Work Type / Pavement Section
2010
North West Apron
Expansion
2011
West side of Runway 17 -35
New Full Len th Parallel Taxiway
2.2 Pavement Inventory
The detailed pavement inventory was updated to reflect the network definition update and field
inspection results.
The total airfield pavement area in 2011 at Marco Island Executive Airport is 844,755 square
feet. The breakdown of pavement area for each pavement use is provided in Table 2 -2.
Table 2 -2: Pavement Area by Pavement Use
Use
Area (ft)
% of Total Area
Runway
500,000
59%
Taxiway
7,880
1 %
Apron
336,875
40%
All (Weighted) 1
844,755
100%
Figure 2 -1 presents the breakdown of the pavement area at Marco Island Executive Airport by
surface type.
11
Packet Page -1335-
Pavement Evaluation Report—Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Figure 2 -1: Pavement Area by Surface Type
1%
99%
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
MAC - Asphalt
Concrete Pavement
® PCC - Portland
Cement Concrete
Details of pavement Branch and Section information including Branch name (which indicates
pavement use), Branch ID, Section ID, section area, rank, surface type, last construction date,
number of samples inspected, and number of samples in each Section are given in Table 2 -3
below. A more detailed Pavement Inventory Table may be found in Appendix A of this report.
12
Packet Page -1336-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 2 -3: Branch and Section Inventory
Branch Name
Branch ID
Section
ID
True
Area
(ft)
Section
Rank
Surface
Type
Last
Const.
Date
Total
Samples
Inspected
Sample
Units in
Section
North Apron
AP N
4205
211,940
P
AC
1/1/1975
5
44
North Apron
AP N
4210
41,600
P
AC
1/1/2010
0
9
NW Apron
AP NW
4105
29,220
P
AC
1/1/1996
1
g
NW Apron
AP NW
4110
23,760
P
AC
1/1/1996
1
g
Apron Turnaround RW 35
AP TA RW35
5105
30,355
P
AC
1/1/1976
2
6
Runway 17 -35
RW 17 -35
6105
100,000
P
AC
1/1/1976
5
20
Runway 17 -35
RW 17 -35
6110
300,000
P
AC
1/1/1976
15
60
Runway 17 -35
RW 17 -35
6115
100,000
P
AC
1/1/1976
5
20
Connector Taxiwa
TW CONN
105
7,880
P
PCC
1/1/1960
1
1
Note: If a new construction, then survey date = last construction date and PCI is set to 100 by MicroPAVER.
Sections not surveyed due to reasons such as re- sectioning, no escort, not accessible at the time of survey.
13
Packet Page -1337-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
3. PAVEMENT CONDITION
Pavement conditions were inspected in accordance with the methods outlined in FAA AC
150/5380 -6B and ASTM D 5340 -04 "Standard Practice for Airport Pavement Condition Index
Surveys." These procedures define distress type, severity and quantity for sampling areas within
each section to determine the Pavement Condition Index (PCI).
3.1 Inspection Methodology
A PCI survey is performed by measuring the amount and severity of pavement distresses, which
are caused by traffic load, climate, and other factors, observed within a sample unit. This data is
imported into MicroPAVER, which calculates PCI values for the pavement sections. Tables 3 -1
and 3 -2 below list the pavement distress types and related causes for asphalt concrete (AC) and
Portland Cement Concrete (PCC), respectively.
Table 3 -1: Pavement Distresses for Asphalt Concrete Surfaces
53
Rutting
Load
54
Shoving
Pavement Growth
55
Slippage Cracking
Load / Pavement Bond
56
Swelling
Climate / Sub ade Quality.
Source: U.S. Arm CERL, FDOT AiJfield Ins ection Reference Manual
14
Packet Page -1338-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 3 -2: Pavement Distresses for Portland Cement Concrete Surfaces
Code
Distress
Mechanism
61
Blow -u
Climate
62
Corner Break
Load
63
Linear Crackin
Load
64
Durabilit Crackin
Climate
65
Joint Seal Dama e
Climate
66
Small Patch
Pavement Re air
67
Lar e Patch/1 Ttilit Cut
Utility / Pavement Re air
68
Po out
Climate
69
Pum in
Load
70
Scalin /Crazin
Construction Quality
71
Faultin
Sub grade Quality
72
Shattered Slab
Load
73
Shrinkage Crackin
Construction Quali / Load
74
Joint S allin
Load
75
Corner S allin
Load
Source: U.S. Arm CERL, FDOTAirfleld Ins ection Reference Manual
Prior to conducting the inspections, Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates were recorded
using CADD at the centroid of each sample unit. The centroid is usually the geometric center of
the area, but in cases where sample units are irregular in shape, this is the center of mass. These
data are presented in a table on the updated Network Definition Map in Appendix A of this
report.
Pavement condition inspections at Marco Island Executive Airport were performed in March
2011. Data were recorded in the field in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 150/5380 -613
"Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements" and ASTM D 5340
"Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys" (2004).
After the completion of data collection, the data was imported into MicroPAVER, and PCI
values were calculated for the pavement sections.
3.2 Pavement Condition Index Results
According to the 2011 survey, the overall area - weighted PCI at Marco Island Executive Airport
is 40, representing a Fair overall network condition.
Overall the airport exhibited pavement distresses associated with climate and age distresses.
Asphalt Concrete pavement distresses include; weathering, raveling, longitudinal and transverse
cracking, and block cracking distresses of which are common of pavements of similar age.
RW 17 -35 exhibited low and medium severity longitudinal and transverse cracking along with
medium severity weathering and raveling. Medium severity block cracking was also observed
throughout the runway pavement section. Similar distresses were observed throughout the older
pavement of the apron section, with low and medium severity block cracking in addition to
15
Packet Page -1339-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
medium severity weathering and raveling. The apron expansion was recently constructed in 2010>
and was not inspected due to its new condition. This pavement section was assumed to have a
PCI of 100.
Appendix B contains a table and a Condition Map which depicts the PCI results by Section, and
Appendix C contains a table of PCI results by Branch. Appendix I includes detailed distress data
generated by MicroPAVER for each inspected sample unit.
Figure 3 -1 provides the PCI distribution by rating category for Marco Island Executive Airport.
Poor 32%
Figure 3 -1: Network PCI Distribution by Rating Category
Good 8% Serious 1%
Figure 3 -1a: Condition Rating Summary
Condition Rating
Total Area
(a
ft )
Percent
65,360
8%
0
0%
0
0%
FESatisfactory
271,515
32%
500,000
59%
7,880
1%
0
0%
!ry Poor 59%
Approximately 8% of the network is in Good condition while 60% of the network is in Very
Poor and Serious condition. Table 3 -3 illustrates the area- weighted PCI computed individually
for each pavement use.
16
Packet Page -1340-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 3 -3: Condition by Pavement Use
Use
Area- Weighted PCI
Condition Rating
Runway
31
Very Poor
Taxiway
21
Serious
Apron
57
Fair
All (Weighted)
40
Very Poor
Figure 3 -2 presents the breakdown of PCI by range for each pavement use.
Figure 3 -2: Percentage of Pavement Area within Each
PCI Range by Pavement Use
(a) Runway
100%
17
Packet Page -1341-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
100%
90%
80%
70%
y 60%
U
V
a 50%
f0
d 40%
Q
30%
20%
]0%
0%
(b) Taxiway
® Good: 86 -100 — Satisfactory: 71 -85 Fair: 56 -70 Lr Poor: 41 -55
7 Very Poor: 26 -40 ■ Serious: 11 -25 0 Failed: 0 -10
18
Packet Page -1342-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
100%
90%
80%
70%
d
i 60%
n.
d 50%
C'
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
(c) Apron
81%
i® Good: 86 -100 :] Satisfactory: 71 -85 :� Fair: 56 -70 E Poor: 41 -55
❑ Very Poor: 26 -40 ■ Serious: 11 -25 o Failed: 0 -10
19
Packet Page -1343-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report -Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
4. PAVEMENT CONDITION PREDICTION
Performance prediction models or deterioration curves for PCI were used to develop a condition
forecast. The performance models were developed for combinations of variables such as
pavement use (runway, taxiway or apron), surface type (AC or PCC) and airport category (GA,
RL, or PR). Figure 4 -1 illustrates the predicted performance of pavements at Marco Island
Executive Airport based on current condition, age since last construction and the deterioration
model appropriate for the type of pavement. The figure presents the forecast for each pavement
use and displays the FDOT minimum service level for General Aviation (GA) airports.
Figure 4 -1: Predicted PCI by Pavement Use
Appendix D presents the tabular summary of the predicted Section PCI for each year from 2011
to 2020.
20
Packet Page -1344-
100
90
80
54
5?
S/
49
48
an
;°.
70
30
38
27
Q
2U
17
-
z4
'�
Runways
!9
60
Taxiways
7
.�
3
50
Apron
0
U
40
FDOT Minimum Service Level
L
d
— - 75 Runways
U30
— - 65 Taxiways
20
-- - 60 Aprons
12
10
10
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018 2019
2020
2021
Year
Appendix D presents the tabular summary of the predicted Section PCI for each year from 2011
to 2020.
20
Packet Page -1344-
54
5?
S/
49
48
30
38
27
2U
17
-
z4
'�
,1
!9
18
/7
7
4
�
`
0
U
Appendix D presents the tabular summary of the predicted Section PCI for each year from 2011
to 2020.
20
Packet Page -1344-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
5. MAINTENANCE POLICIES AND COSTS
5.1 Policies
Maintenance and rehabilitation (M &R) policies are sets of rules used to develop repair
recommendations for distresses encountered during the visual inspections.
Maintenance refers to repair -type activities that are applied to specific distress types on the
pavement. These activities are preventative and/or corrective in nature and are recommended to
help achieve the performance goal.
Table 5 -1 provides the list of the maintenance activities used in MicroPAVER to treat specific
distress types. MicroPAVER applies repairs to these distresses and adjusts the PCI based on
specific rules. These repairs are used only in the first year of an analysis.
Rehabilitation is warranted when the pavement condition decreases below a critical point such
that the deterioration is extensive or the rate of deterioration is so great that routine maintenance
is no longer cost - efficient. This critical point is called "Critical PCI." The critical PCI levels for
different pavement and branch types established in the previous SAPMP update were used in this
update for the development of the M &R plan for the airport. Sections above critical PCI levels
receive routine maintenances while pavements predicted to deteriorate below their respective
critical PCI level during the analysis period will be identified for Major M &R. Table 5 -2 gives
the critical PCI levels for General Aviation Airports.
The maintenance rehabilitation policy and activity costs have been updated based on the study of
readily available construction cost data at the time of this study. The costs depicted in this report
are intended for planning purposes.
21
Packet Page -1345-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Ai1port
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 5 -1: Routine Maintenance Activities for Airfield Pavements
Surface
Distress
Severi *
Work Type
Code
Work Unit
Alligator Crack
M, H
Patching - AC Deep
PA -AD
S Ft
Bleeding
N/A
No Localized M &R
NONE
N/A
Block Crack
M, H
Crack Sealing — AC
CS -AC
S Ft
Corrugation
L, M, H
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Depression
M, H
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Jet Blast
N/A
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Joint Ref. Crack
M, H
Crack Sealing — AC
CS -AC
Ft
L & T Crack
M, H
Crack Sealing — AC
CS -AC
Ft
Oil Spillage
N/A
Patching - AC Shallow
PA -AS
S Ft
AC
Patching
M, H
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Polished Agg.
N/A
No Localized M &R
NONE
N/A
Raveling and
Weathering
L
Surface Sealing - Rejuvenating
SS -RE
S Ft
M
Surface Seal - Coal Tar
SS -CT
S Ft
H
Microsurfacin
MI -AC
S Ft
Rutting
M, H
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Shoving
M, H
Grinding Localized
GR -LL
S Ft
Slippage Crack
N/A
Patching - AC Shallow
PA -AS
S Ft
Swelling
M, H
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Blow-Up
L, M, H
Patching - PCC Full Depth
PA -PF
S Ft
Corner Break
M, H
Patching - PCC Full Depth
PA -PF
S Ft
Linear Crack
M, H
Crack Sealing — PCC
CS -PC
Ft
Durability Crack
H
Slab Replacement — PCC
SL -PC
S Ft
M
Patching - PCC Full Depth
PA -PF
S Ft
Jt. Seal Damage
M, H
Joint Seal Localized
JS -LC
Ft
Small Patch
M, H
Patching - PCC Partial Depth
PA -PP
S Ft
Large Patch
M, H
Patching - PCC Full Depth
PA -PF
S Ft
PCC
Po outs
N/A
No Localized M &R
NONE
N/A
Pumping
N/A
No Localized M &R
NONE
N/A
Scaling
H
Slab Replacement — PCC
SL -PC
S Ft
Faulting
M, H
Grinding Localized
GR -PP
Ft
Shattered Slab
M, H
Slab Replacement — PCC
SL -PC
S Ft
Shrinkage Crack
N/A
No Localized M &R
NONE
N/A
Joint S all
M, H
Patching - PCC Partial Depth
PA -PP
S Ft
Corner S all
I M, H
I Patchin - PCC Partial Depth
PA -PP
S Ft
*L = Low, M = Medium, H = High
22
Packet Page -1346-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 5 -2: Critical PCI for General Aviation Airports
Use
Critical PCI
Runway
65
Taxiway
65
Apron
65
It should be noted that critical PCI is not the same as Minimum PCI or Minimum Condition.
The Minimum PCI is a value set by the user so pavement sections are rehabilitated before they
fall below the set minimum. Table 5 -3 gives the targeted, or desired, Minimum PCI values for
runways, taxiways, and aprons of General Aviation Airports.
Table 5 -3: FDOT Minimum Service Level PCI for General Aviation Airports
Minimum PCI
Runway
Taxiway
Apron
75
65
60
Typical Major M &R activities range from overlays to reconstruction. Based on the critical PCI
values in Table 5 -2 the PCI trigger range when the likely activity would be a mill and resurface
was 40 to 79 and reconstruction at a PCI of 39 or lower. One important concept of pavement
management systems is that it is cost effective to maintain pavements that are already in good
condition rather than wait for them to get worse and require more expensive rehabilitation.
Crack sealing and full -depth patching are the M &R activities recommended to repair pavements
with PCI values between 80 and 90. MicroPAVER considers these as preventative M &R with
their primary objective being to slow the rate of pavement deterioration. While the trigger PCI
for mill and overlay has been set to 55, MicroPAVER also assigns mill and overlay to sections
with a PCI greater than 55 if they exhibit some structural distress. Table 5 -4 summarizes the
M &R activities for General Aviation Airports based on PCI value.
23
Packet Page -1347-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 5 -4: M &R Activities for General Aviation Airports
5.2 Unit Costs
FDOT cost databases for airports and highway pavement maintenance and rehabilitation were
updated from the previous SAPMP study based on current construction cost trends in order to
determine meaningful costs for the program. Table 5 -5 presents the unit costs summary.
5.3 M &R Activities
FDOT recognizes that although Mill and Overlay work is recommended for asphalt pavements
within a PCI range from 40 to 79, it is conceivable that airports may not have adequate funding
to perform this type of rehabilitation. Microsurfacing treatment is a maintenance /rehabilitation
measure that can be used in lieu of asphalt pavement mill and overlay; however it should be
understood that this measure is intended for short term pavement life extension. While the cost of
microsurfacing is significantly lower than that of pavement mill and overlay, it is not intended to
be a full rehabilitative measure for long term benefit.
24
Packet Page -1348-
Activity
PCI Range
Maintenance
Crack Sealing and Full -Depth Patching
80 and 90
Rehabilitation
Mill and Overlay (AC) or
Concrete Pavement Restoration (PCC)
40 to 79
Reconstruction
39 and less
5.2 Unit Costs
FDOT cost databases for airports and highway pavement maintenance and rehabilitation were
updated from the previous SAPMP study based on current construction cost trends in order to
determine meaningful costs for the program. Table 5 -5 presents the unit costs summary.
5.3 M &R Activities
FDOT recognizes that although Mill and Overlay work is recommended for asphalt pavements
within a PCI range from 40 to 79, it is conceivable that airports may not have adequate funding
to perform this type of rehabilitation. Microsurfacing treatment is a maintenance /rehabilitation
measure that can be used in lieu of asphalt pavement mill and overlay; however it should be
understood that this measure is intended for short term pavement life extension. While the cost of
microsurfacing is significantly lower than that of pavement mill and overlay, it is not intended to
be a full rehabilitative measure for long term benefit.
24
Packet Page -1348-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 5 -5: Maintenance Unit Costs for FDOT
Code
Name
Cost
Unit
GR -LL
Grinding (Localized for AC)
$2.10
SgFt
PA -AL
Patching — AC Leveling
$2.30
SgFt
PA -AS
Patching — AC Shallow
$2.90
SgFt
PA -PF
Patching — PCC Full Depth
$38.11
SgFt
PA -PP
Patching — PCC Partial Depth
$19.06
SgFt
SL -PC
Slab Replacement — PCC
$39.11
SgFt
CS -PC
Crack Sealing — PCC
$4.24
Ft
UN -PC
Undersealing — PCC
$3.40
Ft
CS -AC
Crack Sealing — AC
$2.25
Ft
GR -PP
Grinding (Localized for PCC)
$22.51
Ft
JS -LC
Joint Seal (Localized)
$2.00
Ft
SH -LE
Shoulder Leveling
$2.81
Ft
JS -SI
Joint Seal — Silicon
$2.81
Ft
PA -AD
Patching — AC Deep
$4.90 1
SgFt
OL -AT
Overlay — AC Thin
$2.80
SgFt
SS -CT
Surface Seal — Coal Tar
$0.40
SgFt
SS -FS
Surface Seal — Fog Seal
$0.40
SgFt
SS -RE
Surface Seal — Rejuvenating
$0.40
SgFt
ST -SB
Surface Treatment — Single Bitum.
$0.30
SgFt
ST -SS
Surface Treatment — Slurry Seal
$0.55
SgFt
ST -ST
Surface Treatment — Sand Tar
$0.28
SgFt
MI -AC
Microsurfacing - AC
$0.65
SgFt
The improvement in condition due to maintenance actions applied to specific distresses is only
performed when an inspection was performed recently and only in the first year of the M &R
analysis. In subsequent years, MicroPAVER calculates M &R costs based on expected unit costs
for pavements in a range of PCIs. That is, for low PCI, it is expected that the repair would be
significant (e.g. reconstruction) and therefore very costly.
Using available unit cost data, the Major M &R Cost by Condition table was set up as shown in
Table 5 -6. The cost assigned to each range of PCI is based on a Transportation Cost Report
provided by Office of Planning Policy of FDOT where the unit costs of reconstruction and
resurfacing of airfield pavements were included. These costs were then assigned to the
appropriate PCI range to arrive at a cost per square foot necessary to restore pavements at that
PCI level to new condition, i.e. a PCI of 100.
25
Packet Page -1349-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Aft
Table 5 -6: M &R Activities and Unit Costs by Condition for V,
General Aviation Airports
A 3% inflation rate per year was applied to the unit costs during the M &R analysis.
Packet Page -1350-
Activity
PCI Trigger
Cost /SgFt
Maintenance
Crack Sealing and Full -Depth Patching
90
$0.06
80
$0.24
Rehabilitation
Mill and Overlay (AC) or
Concrete Pavement Restoration (PCC)
70
$3.00
60
$3.42
50
$6.29
40
$6.29
Reconstruction
30
1 $13.62
20
1 $13.62
A 3% inflation rate per year was applied to the unit costs during the M &R analysis.
Packet Page -1350-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
6. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION NEEDS ANALYSIS
Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M &R) analyses were performed after the condition data were
calculated and MicroPAVER was customized with the maintenance policies and cost settings
described in the previous section.
The objective of the M &R analysis is to observe the effect of different fiscal scenarios on the
network condition, over a period of ten years, starting from 2011. The analysis was conducted
using an unlimited budget. An unlimited budget allows all M &R needs to be identified along
with the associated cost regardless of priority.
Table 6 -1 presents the M &R list of immediate needs for Major M &R, i.e. Year 1 of the forecast.
The importance of this listing is that it points out the major activities triggered by the current
condition of the pavements.
Table 6 -1: Summary of Immediate Major M &R Needs Option No. 1
Branch Name
Section
ID
Surface
Type
Section
Area (ft2)
Major M &R
Costs*
PCI
Before
Activity
PCI After
M &R
North Apron
4205
AC
211,940
$1,333,102.70
47
Mill and Overlay
100
NW Apron
4105
AC
29,220
$183,793.81
47
Mill and Overlay
100
Apron Turnaround RW 35
5105
AC
30,355
$190,932.97
45
Mill and Overlay
100
Runway 17 -35
6105
AC
100,000
$1,288,700.37
31
Reconstruction
100
Runway 17 -35
6110
AC
300,000
$4,086,001.33
29
Reconstruction
100
Runway 17 -35
6115
AC
100,000
$995,500.25
35
Reconstruction
100
Connector Taxiway
105
PCC
7,880
$107,325.63
20
Reconstruction
100
Total
$8,185,357.06
36
100
* Costs are adjusted for inflation.
FDOT recognizes that the costs attributed to the aforementioned `Major Activity' of performing
a pavement `Mill and Overlay' may conflict with budgetary constraints. Table 6 -2 presents an
alternative minor rehabilitative activity to the mid -range performing pavements. The alternative
activity is performing a `Microsurfacing /Slurry Seal' to the pavement to retard the degradation of
the facility until funding is available for a `Mill and Overlay' activity.
27
Packet Page -1351-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Ai7port
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 6 -2: Summary of Immediate Major M &R Needs Option No. 2
Branch Name
Section
ID
Surface
Type
Section
Area (ft)
Major M &R
Costs*
PCI
Before
M &R
M &R Activity
PCI After
M &R
North Apron
4205
AC
211,940
$137,761.00
47
Microsurfacing
100
NW Apron
4105
AC
29,220
$18,993.00
47
Microsurfacing
100
Apron Turnaround RW 35
5105
AC
30,355
$19,730.75
45
Microsurfacing
100
Runway 17 -35
6105
AC
100,000
$1,288,700.37
31
Reconstruction
100
Runway 17 -35
6110
AC
300,000
$4,086,001.33
29
Reconstruction
100
Runway 17 -35
6115
AC
100,000
$995,500.25
35
Reconstruction
100
Connector Taxiway
105
PCC
7,880
$107,325.63
20
Reconstruction
100
Total
$6,654,012.33
36
1
100
* Costs are adjusted for inflation.
In addition to the immediate Major M &R needs, maintenance activities for pavement areas
above critical PCI have been recommended by MicroPAVER for Year 1 and are shown in Table
6 -3 below. The costs provided in Table 5 -5 were used to calculate the costs associated with this
work, which is intended to treat specific distress types. A more detailed table is provided in
Appendix E.
28
Packet Page -1352-
w �
O m
U �
s
I
o
o cy
W
^.'sN
0
ly
v
C
r.r
G�
ii
a
M
cs
00 00
0
� � C.)
o �
C
o II cd
to
tr
L � �
O C
3� c
0
i
ON a
3'
bJD
a � �
0
�Y
C O
U
C is Y
O G C
d O
L
O � Y
� U y
bo
-M
rA
cz �
A n C
cn
3
c �
m E
5n
M
aa) >
cz
z on
O
C U
E-+ >
3
z
N
W
N
4
N
O
N
.-r
CD
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Figure 6 -1: Budget Scenario Analysis
100
90
80
70
Q
60
°D 50
3 —9--No M &R
i 40 —t— M &R
d 30
U
o, 20
10
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Year
The following network level observations can be made from the figure above:
• The PCI will deteriorate from 40 in 2011 to 28 in ten years if no M &R activities are low
performed.
• The PCI will remain at or above 86 through the 10 -year analysis period under the
unlimited budget scenario. A 2020 PCI of 86 with this scenario is 58 PCI points
higher than a "No M &R" scenario. The total cost for Major M &R over this 10 -year
period is about $8.2 million.
30
Packet Page -1354-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
7. MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PLAN
The M &R analysis results include activities that likely exceed a typical annual budget level.
These activities would need to be evaluated for feasibility and desirability based on the airport's
future plans. In an effort to identify appropriate budget levels, the 10 year M &R analysis was
evaluated to determine levels needed to address several specific areas: preventive maintenance,
major activities for pavements in poor condition (Major M &R for PCIs less than Critical), and
activities that would be desirable to preserve good pavement conditions where they exist (Major
M &R for PCI greater than or equal to Critical).
Table 7 -1 provides the summary results under the critical PCI unlimited funding scenario
Table 7 -1: M &R Costs under Unlimited Funding Scenario
Year
Preventative
Major M &R
Total Year Cost
2011
$566.78
$8,185,357.06
$8,185,923.84
2012
$679.30
$0.00
$679.30
2013
$1,872.95
$0.00
$1,872.95
2014
$2,950.33
$0.00
$2,950.33
2015
$4,283.56
$0.00
$4,283.56
2016
$5,714.21
$0.00
$5,714.21
2017
$7,846.50
$0.00
$7,846.50
2018
$9,921.25
$0.00
$9,921.25
2019
$30,360.44
$0.00
$30,360.44
2020
$41,840.20
$0.00
$41,840.20
Total
$106,035.52
$8,185,357.06
$8,291,392.58
Note: Costs are adjusted for inflation.
Approximately 100% of the total Major M &R cost is required in the first year (2011). According
to the 2011 inspections, the following pavement sections were in immediate need of Major M &R
Activity:
• North Apron — Asphalt Pavement mill and overlay activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Northwest Apron — Asphalt Pavement mill and overlay activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Apron Turnaround RW 35 — Asphalt Pavement mill and overlay activity per the
FAA P -401 Specification.
• Runway 17 -35 — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Taxiway Connector — Portland Cement Concrete reconstruction activity per the FAA
P -501 Specification.
31
Packet Page -1355-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
The unlimited budget scenario provides the basis for estimating the total repair cost.
Appendix F provides details of M &R plan by year under the unlimited funding scenario, and the
map of the 10 -year M &R plan is provided in Appendix G. It is important to understand that the
SAPMP is a network level tool and the M &R costs provided in this report are only for planning
purposes.
32
Packet Page -1356-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
8. VISUAL AIDS
8.1 System Inventory and Network Definition Drawings
The System Inventory and Network Definition CADD drawings, which show the airport
pavement outline with Branch and Section boundaries and identify changes in the network
pavement since the last inspection and the sampling plan, respectively, are included in Appendix
A of this report.
8.2 Condition Map
A Condition Map that has been prepared based on data linked to the airport's shape file is
included in Appendix B. The Condition Map graphically show the inventory and condition of the
airport via color coding shown on the shape file. The coding provides a visual representation
that illustrates the PCIs for each pavement section.
8.3 10 -Year M &R Map
A 10 -Year M &R Map that shows the summary of the M &R plan is attached in Appendix G.
8.4 Photographs
Selected digital photographs taken during the pavement inspection are provided in Appendix H
to provide visual support to special pavement conditions or distress observed during the
inspection of the airport.
33
Packet Page -1357-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
9. RECOMMENDATIONS
Pavement condition inspections were performed at Marco Island Executive Airport, and a 10-
year M &R plan was developed based on the unlimited funding scenario.
The following recommendations were made based on the 2011 condition inspection and M &R
analysis results:
• North Apron — Asphalt Pavement mill and overlay activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Northwest Apron — Asphalt Pavement mill and overlay activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Apron Turnaround RW 35 — Asphalt Pavement mill and overlay activity per the
FAA P -401 Specification.
• Runway 17 -35 — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Taxiway Connector — Portland Cement Concrete reconstruction activity per the FAA
P -501 Specification.
Further evaluation of these features is necessary in order to develop repair plans and timing for
future budgets since these needs cannot be addressed with typical annual expenditures.
34
Packet Page -1358-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
APPENDIX A
NETWORK DEFINITION MAP
SYSTEM INVENTORY MAP
PAVEMENT INVENTORY TABLE
WORK HISTORY REPORT
Packet Page -1359-
Y
W «m
WO
o c
;6 W o O
UJ
w I
__
Nv� k� _o ��
� €;gym- �� £p� �'< Q ��� �QSV 4
�„ � ¢ � Mag'� 3� M�� �g Q 3 zgWj La
s 9p5 bbb0�� o _. Q�
'
ISBN
n $ aao
2 • oe
O � z
a• Wp
4qo`.
, 616
ez
,e99"
199
' S1
'A
,n
13 '.
�!1
tie0; Q
`1z6 e--I
'�xa Q1
uA
1�zz- fD
O_
o 4-
6 N
n, V„s-
- a
;113.
X09
col
1R
n!
L
�1
+.,
O
m
3
0
G�
�I
c
rl
GC
i�
w°p
0
zz
z
ti
a
0 0.,
'O N
O
E.
a�
R
O
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
O�
C� �
O�
�
O,
O,
C
F
�
�
a �
0 a
O
Zo
N
r-
M
O
O
00
[� Q
N
N
N
MO
O
O
O
rn
1"r
ON
C)
O
O
O
3"
N
O
O
O
00
M
na
M
C
v')
o
W%
kn
O
y
N
-4
N
�
0
0¢¢¢¢
0
0
0
3
3
3
3
a
a
a
z
z
z
x
M
V'1
V'1
V'1
z
rn
M
r4
Z
�
3
cc
CL
s¢
Q
¢
o
cC
cC
c�
y
-
L-
0
L
z
z
z¢
x
x
r
Q
CA)
N
4
N
O
w
.-f
rn
Date:06/15/2011 Work History Report
Pavement Database:
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
1 of 2 1
Network: MKY Branch: AP N (NORTH APRON) Section: 4205 Surface: AC
;.D.: 01/01/1975 Use: APRON Rank P Length: 878.00 Ft Width: 232.00 Ft True Area:211,940.00 SoF
Work
Work
Works
hickness
Major"
Date',
Code
Description`
Cost
0
M &R
Comments
...
01/
01/1975
IMPORTED
BUILT. �°�' ""
�=
True
ST 1975 AC
Network: MKY Branch: AP N (NORTH APRON) Section: 4210 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2010 Use: APRON Rank P Length: 300.00 Ft Width: 135.00 Ft True Area: 41,600.00 SqF
Work
Works
Work
Cost
hick ness
Major
Comments
Date'
Code
Description
( I'
M &R
01/01/2010 !
INITIAL
; Initial Constructiori
$0
1 0:0
True
11,
Network: MKY Branch: AP NW (NW APRON) Section: 4105 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1996 Use: APRON Rank P Length: 131.00 Ft Width: 199.00 Ft True Area: 29,220.00 SqF
Work-_ ° -
Work
Work
Idcness
Maiorfi
Date:'
Code
Description
Cost
(in), °;
M &R
Comments
µ
wr
01/01/1996
IMPORTED
BUILT
True
ST 1996 AC PAVEMENT
Network: MKY Branch: AP NW (NW APRON) Section: 4110 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1996 Use: APRON Rank P Length: 90.00 Ft Width: 199.00 Ft True Area: 23,760.00 SQF
Work.
Work
Work ";
hidcness
Major
.
Dates'`
Code
Description _ .
Cost
(.Tn)` "r; '
M &R
Comments
01/01/1996 `-
INITIAL
Initial Coristructiori� `3'' ° ;
$0
0:0
True
Network: MKY Branch: AP TA RW35 (APRON TURNAROUND RW 35) Section: 5105 Surface: AC
L.C.D,: 01/01/1976 Use: APRON Rank P Length: 176.00 Ft Width: 150.00 Ft True Area: 30,355.00 SqF
Work
Work
Work
hickness
Major
Date .
Code
Description
Cost
(in) . <
M &R
Comments
01/1976
IMPORTED
BUILT
3:0
True
976: 3" AC ON 7 "SOIL- CEMENT
Network: MKY Branch: RW 17 -35 (RUNWAY 17 -35) Section: 6105 Surface: AC
L.C.D,: 01/01/1976 Use: RUNWAY Rank P Length: 1,000.00 Ft Width: 100.00 Ft True Area: 100,000.00 SaF
Work _
Work
Work° -'.
hickness
Major
Date `'>
Code
Description
Cost
" (in) .,
M &R
Comments
01/01/1976 `
IMPORTED
BUILT ", =
3'.0d
True
h 976: 3" AC ON T.. SOIL-CEMENT',
Network: MKY Branch: RW 17 -35 (RUNWAY 17 -35) Section: 6110 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1976 Use: RUNWAY Rank P Length: 3,000.00 Ft Width: 100.00 Ft True Area:300,000.00 SaF
Work,'
Work
Work: "-
Thickness
Major
Date'
Code
Description
Cost
(fn)
M&R
- Comments
01/01/1976"
IMPORTED
BUILT
2.ON
True
976:2 "AC'ON7 "SOIL- CEMENT L
Network: MKY Branch: RW 17 -35 (RUNWAY 17 -35) Section: 6115 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1976 Use: RUNWAY Rank P Length: 1,000.00 Ft Width: 100.00 Ft True Area: 100,000.00 SqF
Work
Work
Work;
hickness
Major
Date
Code
Description
Cost
(n)
M &R
Comments
01/01/1976"
IMPORTED
BUILT
3.01
True
976: 3 "AC`ON 7 "SOIL- CEMENT
Network: MKY Branch: TW CONN (CONNECTOR TAXIWAY) Section: 105 Surface: PCC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1960 Use: TAXIWAY Rank P Length: 100.00 Ft Width: 46.00 Ft True Area: 7,880.00 SqF
Work
Work
Work
11.1cknessl
Major
Date
Code
Description' .
Cost
( in)
M &R
Comments,
01/01/1960'
IMPORTED
BUILT ' ,-
I
True
KST1960PCC
Packet Page -1363-
Date:06 /15i2011 Work History Report
Pavement Database:
Summary:
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
2 of 2 1
Work Description
Section
Count
Area Total
SgFt
Thickness Avg
in
Thickness STD
(in)
BUILT
7
779,395.00
2.75
.50
Initial Construction
2
65,360.00
.00
.00
STD = Standard Deviation
Packet Page -1364-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
APPENDIX B
2011 CONDITION MAP
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX TABLE
Packet Page -1365-
\��|
g! §( §� §�
|
■i
2 §|
- ,
: §�i
. rm
IRP
/
k
q
k
2
Q?
�
?\ �
..� \
«
� !|
!
| |
O
YS
"C3
C
C
0
•.n
L"r
O
U
:r
^^RS�
F+��I
MM1
F�
U "3
Ltd O
a
o
d�
O Q,
'3N
O
0.
w
N
v
N
O
N
CD
3
rn
-91
y
6>
a
coo
w
I'D
O
N
O
rV
o
N
E� eC
y 'Ci
rr
G U
V'l
O
N
vl
�
v'1
w �•
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
a �
O a
R
N
M
O
O
O
OO
3
3
3
3
I~I
3
3
M
to
M
kn
M
V'1
M
z
z
z
z
O
¢
d¢¢
H
3
3
3
3
kn
M
�
3
d¢
°
3
3
3
C:
L°
c
z
z
z
z
d
0.
w
N
v
N
O
N
CD
3
rn
-91
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
APPENDIX C
BRANCH CONDITION REPORT
SECTION CONDITION REPORT
Packet Page -1368-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Branch Condition Report
Date: 6 /15/2011 1 of 2
Pavement Database: NetworklD: MKY
Number of
Sum Section
Avg Section
True Area
PCI Weghted
Branch ID
Sections
Length
Width
(SgFt)
Use Average Standard Average
(Ft)
(Ft)
PCI DeviationPCI ;
.2
�II
AP N (NORTH APRON)
2
1,178.00
183.50
253,540.00
APRON L, 78,50 26.50 55 70
°s
d
X67
AP NW (NW APRON)
2
221.00
199.00
52,980.00
APRON 69.50 22.50 * < 18
AP TA RW35 (APRON
1
176.00
150.00
30,355.00
APRON 45.00' 0.00 45, 00
TURNAROUND RW 35)
n,
RW 17 -35 (RUNWAY 17 -35)
3
5,000.00
100.00
500,000.00
RUNWAY 3,1.67, 2.49 ' ;r 30 60
TW CONN (CONNECTOR
1
100.00
46.00
7,880.00
TAXIWAY 21M 0.00 ;f 21.00
TAXIWAY)
AT
Packet Page -1369-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Date: 6 /15/2011 Branch Condition Report 2 of 2
Pavement Database:
Use
Category
Number
of
Sections
Total
Area
(SgFt)
Arithmetic
Average
PCI
Average
PCI
STD.
Weighted
Average
PCI
APRON
5
336,875.00
66.20
24.47
56.54
RUNWAY
3
500,000.00
31.67
2.49
30.60
TAXIWAY
1
7,880.00
21.00
0.00
21.00
All
9
844,755.00
49.67
26.19
40.85
STD = Standard Deviation
Packet Page -1370-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Date: 6 /15/2011 Section Condition Report 1 of 2
Pavement Database: NetworklD: MKY
Branch ID Section ID last ' Surface Use Rank Lanes True Area Last • .,,, Age Pcl
_ inspection: A t
Const (SgFt) � Date: l, Inspection
AP N (NORTH APRON)
4205
01/01/1975:
AC
APRON
P
0
211,940.00 03/31/2011.,;
36
% 47 00.
, PO.
0 54
}:
IT
AP N (NORTH APRON)
4210
01/01/2010_
AC
APRON
P
0
41,600 00 01/01/2010:'
0
00
i1D0
kk ,:.
AP NW (NW APRON)
4105
01I01/1996
AC
APRON
P
0
29,220.00'03/ 31/201'1 :1
15
47 00`
emu'
AP NW (NW APRON)
4110
01/01/1996
AC
APRON
P
0
23,760.00 03/31/2011.
15
92 00'
1.00
AP TA RW35 (APRON
5105
1=
01/01/1976
AC
APRON
P
0
30,355.00 03131/2011^,
35
45 00
-T1JRNAROUND- RVV-35 )
x
RW 17 -35 (RUNWAY 17 -35)
6105
'01/01/1976,,
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
100,000.00 03/31/2011 ';
35
31 00
RW 17 -35 (RUNWAY 17 -35)
6110
01/0111976'
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
300,000.00 03/31/2011:
35
29.00
gi1
k
X35
RW 17 -35 (RUNWAY 17 -35)
6115
01/01/1976,
AC
RUNWAY
P
0
100,000.00 03/31/2011:
35
�r 00'
TW CONN (CONNECTOR
105
X01/0111960
PCC
TAXIWAY
P
0
7,880.00 03/31/2011`
51
2-1.00
Packet Page -1371-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Date: 6 /15/2011 Section Condition Report 2 of 2
Pavement Database:
Age
Category
Average
Age At
Inspection
Total
Area
(SgFt)
Number
of
Sections
Arithmetic
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
0 -02
0.00
41,600.00
1
100.00
0.00
100.00
11 -15
15.00
52,980.00
2
69.50
22.50
67.18
31 -35
35.00
530,355.00
4
35.00
6.16
31.42
36 -40
36.00
211,940.00
1
47.00
0.00
47.00
over 40
51.00
7,880.00
1
21.00
0.00
21.00
All
28.56
844,755.00
9
49.67
26.19
40.85
Packet Page -1372-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
APPENDIX D
PAVEMENT CONDITION PREDICTION TABLE
PREDICTED PCI BY PAVEMENT USE GRAPH
Packet Page -1373-
O
m
wo
s
h y
o�
o�
x�
s �
0 0.,
O
V
•r
i.n
a
r
0
0
U
H
Lin
1
Q
CC
0
w
N
4
N
O
m
rn
:p
N
O
M
00
M
00
M
N
N
O
M
00
M
00
M
N
N
N
O
M
00
M
00
M
N
N
N
N
�
N
L
�I
IIj
�
N
N
M
N
4
kr)
\:J
kn
N
�I
p
t`
-,t
00
O,
er
O,
kn
�
M
N
M
N
N
C
� r1
L a
Ct
O
O
Q,
fit'
M
N
M
N
3
U
c
O
kn
o
v'
o
Ln
W)
o
,r,
M~W
M
M
M
M
z
z
z
z
6
¢¢¢
3
3
3
3
kn
M
v
�
R
z
3
oV,knV
L
¢
¢
Ea
OU
0
0
z
z
z
z
¢ ¢
x
x
0
w
N
4
N
O
m
rn
:p
O
y
wO
O �
Ct �
d �
O �
a d
W �
� O
C
V
U
�I
1
A
i.n
w
N
+� CG
CC M
� a
I I !
0
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
0
N
0
N
O
N
0
N L
ea
a>
0
N
N
O
N
0
N
O
N
O
O O O O O O O O O O O N
O O� 00 [-- �O v') 11 M
a2V13AV pa;g2►aM ua iV I3d
W
N
N
O
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
T
I
!
h
I
!
�
0
0
W
N
N
O
N
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
APPENDIX E
YEAR 1 MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES TABLE
Packet Page -1376-
0
0
ao
� N
O
U
V
�i
CCi
c
1�
i.
1
W
e�
U � �
�n v(OS
0
3
F
o a w
3 � �
L � �
O �
3=
a
o
�L �y
U
Q �
Lr �
O �
3
r �
A �
L" w
6� y
rA i
Q y
A 3
�A o
~"
Q
� z
� a
L
p
a�
C
CS
Z
U O
[ a
L
q 3
z
w
G.)
N
4
\
N
O
N
rn
a r, 11
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
APPENDIX F
MAJOR M &R PLAN BY YEAR UNDER UNLIMITED FUNDING
SCENARIO TABLE
Packet Page -1378-
t-
a.
W p
0
O
o a
. y
W
stti
� LL
•�rr
YV
C
V
bD
C
b
C
D
w
.w
.r
C
s,
a�
C
i.
C
L
O
a
L
U
0
0
0
0
L
V
Y
L
Y
Y
Y
W
C�
CC
fC
O
0
0
0
L)
0 CG
oC
c4
0.
M
O
O
O
N
.�
r-
l
O�
[ �
w
M
M
O
00
\O
V'1
oe
p
M
oe
C�
00
00
CN
C
O
N
O
U
�s
cc
ss
cfl
sFi
�
ss
cfl
69
C
CC
c.Rr C.
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
ov,
0
�n
0
kn
0
kn
0
o
,r,
0
rn
3
C4
11
�Q
L
C
cz
M
M
M
C
s
s
0
r-+
L
L$.
�
C
•iC
z
z
¢
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
=IH
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
-ti
cn
L
C3
En
0
U
dF
LL
W
N
y
N
O
N
a F. .1
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
APPENDIX G
10 -YEAR M &R MAP
Packet Page -1380-
«,
woI
sg ��:
, g \
LOU (( ( ` § ) 4; ■z|
° � \§ \ � ;■
b - - - -- - \! ®A|
§: ;.,.,..,. }}
OW|
� \
/
t� Q
$
~ ¥
CU
2
u
CL
y» <
�
! |
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
APPENDIX H
PHOTOGRAPHS
Packet Page -1382-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
AP TA RW 35, Section 5105, Sample Unit 300 — Low and medium severity (43) Block Cracking, low severity (52) Weathering and Raveling
AP TA RW 35, Section 5105, Sample Unit 300 —Low and medium severity (43) Block Cracking, low severity (52) Weathering and Raveling
H -1
Packet Page -1383-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Runway 17 -35, Section 6110, Sample Unit 130— Medium severity (43) Block Cracking, medium severity (52) Weathering and Raveling
Runway 17 -35, Section 6110, Sample Unit 130 —Medium severity (43) Block Cracking, medium severity (52) Weathering and Raveling
H -2
Packet Page -1384-
M kkk
o«piM
�.�(`YA�(..".�
`M}<!&' �fai��
ARM "Wo
; �^*'�Y .tai ,,-,
Ir
r �5
�� �YA ..v ,.�x R -�k law
r•. .} t►' f ar� as ,~ tr xT r K �T,'Sgi'�% T' „�w�.'�^ 1,* r
e +� "•�yv � �, � � ���' "r ,y 'sd n'" � +YY � r y, � 1 sr '�'` � 3 q+
..ti ,�,r'i!�"�'•
l' {___}
r
M•��..i. Y!CZ'.'a. .i+ Y. ._ ro �. �'.+�Y��lr..a ���JL. �p �vyh.. ... �e u. :w � •�,� #h �_ t� .�.
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Pavement Evaluation Report —Marco Island Executive Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Apron, Section 4205, Sample Unit 257 — Low and medium severity (43) Block Cracking, low severity (52) Weathering and Raveling
Taxiway Connector, Section 105, Sample Unit 100— Low severity (63) LTD Cracking, medium severity (66) Patch, low severity (70)
Scaling /Map Cracking, medium severity (72) Shattered Slabs, (73) Shrinkage Cracks, low severity (74) Joint Spalling
H -5
Packet Page -1387-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
APPENDIX I
PCI RE- INSPECTION REPORT
Packet Page -1388-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 6/15/2011
Site Name:
rork: MKY Name: MARCO ISLAND AIRPORT
Branch: AP N Name: NORTH APRON
Use: APRON
Area: 253,540.00SgFt
Section: 4205 of 2 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1975
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: P
Area: 211,940.00SgFt Length: 878.0017t
Width: 232.0017t
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00
Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3/31/2011 Total Samples: 44 Surveyed: 5
Conditions: PCIA7.00
Inspection Continents:
Sample Number: loo Type: R
Area:
5,000.00sgFt
PCI = 43
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
2,499.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
1,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 152 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 49
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 257 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00sgFt
PCI = 48
-)le Comments:
BLOCK CRACKING
M
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
4.i BLOCK CRACKING
L
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 303 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00sgFt
PCI = 47
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 455 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 49
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1389-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 6/15/2011
Site Name:
Network: MKY Name: MARCO ISLAND AIRPORT
Branch: AP N Name: NORTH APRON Use: APRON Area: 253,540.00SgFt
Section: 4210 of 2 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/2010
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 41,600.00SgFt Length: 300.00Ft Width: 135.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date1 /1/2010 Total Samples: 0 Surveyed: 0
Conditions: PCI:100.00
Inspection Comments: Construction/Major M &R inspection record.
Sample Number: Type: Area: 0.00
<NO SAMPLE RECORDS>
Packet Page -1390-
v
Sample Number: 356 Type: R
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
48 LONGITUDINAL / TRAANSVERSE CRACKING
50 PATCHING
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
Area:
Re- inspection Report
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
FDOT
M
1,905.98
SgFt
Report Generated Date:
6/15/2011
1,735.99
SgFt
Site Name:
L
18.00
Ft
vork: MKY
Name: MARCO ISLAND AIRPORT
8.00
SgFt
Branch: AP NW
Name: NW APRON
Use: APRON
Area: 52,980.00SgFt
Section: 4105
of 2 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1996
Surface: AC
Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC Zone:
Category:
Rank: P
Area: 29,220.00SgFt
Length: 131.00Ft Width:
199.0017t
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /31/2011
Total Samples: 8 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCIA7.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 356 Type: R
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
48 LONGITUDINAL / TRAANSVERSE CRACKING
50 PATCHING
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
Area:
4,852.00SgFt
PCI = 47
M
1,905.98
SgFt
Comments:
L
1,735.99
SgFt
Comments:
L
18.00
Ft
Comments:
L
8.00
SgFt
Comments:
M
34.01
Ft
Comments:
Packet Page -1391-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 6/15/2011
Site Name:
Network: MKY Name: MARCO ISLAND AIRPORT
Branch: AP NW Name: NW APRON Use: APRON Area: 52,980.00SgFt
Section: 4110 of 2 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1996
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 23,760.00SgFt Length: 90.0017t Width: 199.001't
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3/31/2011 Total Samples: 8 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:92.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 102 Type: R Area: 5,17I.00SgFt PCI = 92
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING L 3.00 Ft Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING L 200.00 SgFt Comments:
v
Packet Page -1392-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 6/15/2011
Site Name:
cork: MKY Name: MARCO ISLAND AIRPORT
Branch: AP TA RW35 Name: APRON TURNAROUND RW 35
Use: APRON
Area: 30,355.00SgFt
Section: 5105 of 1 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1976
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: P
Area: 30,355.00SgFt Length: 176.00Ft
Width: 150.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3/31/2011 Total Samples: 6 Surveyed: 2
Conditions: PCI:45.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 100 Type: R Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 48
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 300 Type: R Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 43
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
1,249.99
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
3,749.97
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1393-
Re- inspection Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 6/15/2011
Site Name:
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
Network: MKY Name: MARCO ISLAND AIRPORT
V
Branch: RW 17 -35 Name: RUNWAY 17 -35
Use: RUNWAY Area: 500,000.00SgFt
Section: 6105 of 3 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1976
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -RW -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 100,000.00SgFt Length: 1,000.00Ft Width: 100.0017t
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /31/2011 Total Samples: 20 Surveyed: 5
Conditions: PCI:31.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 103 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00sgFt
PCI = 27
PCI = 44
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M 4,499.96
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
80.00
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
76.02
Ft
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
1,949.98
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 107 Type: R Area: 5,000.00SgFt
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING M 3,499.97 SgFt
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING M 2,999.98 SgFt
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING L 50.01 Ft
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING M 171.04 Ft
Sample Number: 113 Type: R Area: 5,000.00SgFt
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING M 3,999.97 SgFt
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING M 2,999.98 SgFt
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING M 104.03 Ft
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING L 100.03 Ft
PCI = 27
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
PCI = 29
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Sample Number: 116 Type: R
Area: 5,000.o0SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M 4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M 2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L 56.01
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M 50.01
Ft
Comments:
Sample Number: 119 Type: R Area: 5,000.00SgFt
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING L 1,499.99 SgFt
43 BLOCK CRACKING M 2,999.98 SgFt
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING L 86.02 Ft
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING M 2,999.98 SgFt
Packet Page -1394-
PCI = 27
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 6/15/2011
Site Name:
,pork: MKY Name: MARCO ISLAND AIRPORT
Branch: RW 17 -35 Name: RUNWAY 17 -35
Use: RUNWAY
Area: 500,000.00SgFt
Section: 6110 of 3 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1976
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -RW -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: P
Area: 300,000.00SgFt Length: 3,000.00Ft
Width:
100.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00
Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3/31/2011 Total Samples: 60 Surveyed:
15
Conditions: PCI:29.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 122 Type: R
Area:
5,000.0OSgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 130 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 131 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
-_ WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 136 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 141 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 145 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 146 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 149 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 150 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
5- --ole Comments:
BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
�. WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1395-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 6/15/2011
Site Name:
Sample Number: 155 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 156 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 160 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 32
Sample Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 165 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 32
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 170 Type: R
Area:
5,000.0oSgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 175 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments: *'
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1396-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 6/15/2011
Site Name:
vork: MKY Name: MARCO ISLAND AIRPORT
Branch: RW 17 -35 Name: RUNWAY 17 -35
Use: RUNWAY
Area: 500,000.00SgFt
Section: 6115 of 3 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1976
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -RW -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: P
Area: 100,000.00SgFt Length: 1,000.00Ft
Width: 100.o0Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00
Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3/31/2011 Total Samples: 20 Surveyed: 5
Conditions: PCI:35.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 182 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 186 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 190 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
-_ WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 194 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00sgFt
PCI = 49
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 198 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 42
Sample Commnents:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,499.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
1,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1397-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.4.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 6/15/2011
Site Name:
Network: MKY Name: MARCO ISLAND AIRPORT
Branch: TW CONN Name: CONNECTOR TAXIWAY Use: TAXIWAY Area: 7,880.00SgFt
Section: 105 of 1 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1960
Surface: PCC Family: FDOT -GA -PCC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 7,880.00SgFt Length: 100.0017t Width: 46.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /31/2011 Total Samples: 1 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:21.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 100 Type: R
Area:
4.00Slabs
PCI = 21
Sample Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
3.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
72 SHATTERED SLAB
M
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
66 SMALL PATCH
M
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
Packet Page -1398-