Agenda 03/27/2012 Item #16G3Proposed Agenda Changes
Board of County Commissioners Meeting
March 27, 2012
Page 2
Move Item 16G3 to Item 14A3: Recommendation to approve
the submittal of a grant application to the Federal Aviation
Administration in the amount of $725,000, subject to change
based on RFP results, for the design and bid of the restoration
of Runway 9 -27 at the Immokalee Regional Airport.
(Commissioner Hiller's request)
Move Item 17C to Item 9A: Recommendation to adopt an ordinance amending Ordinance
No. 75 -16, as amended, as it relates to procedures for reconsideration of agenda items.
(Commissioner Hiller's request)
Time Cert ain Items:
Item 11F to be heard at 10:00 a.m.
Item 5A to be heard at 11:00 a.m.
Item 11M to be heard at 11:30 a.m.
Item 11K to be heard at 1:05 p.m.
Item 14132 to be heard at 1:15 p.m.
Items 14133 and 14134 to be heard immediately after Item 14132
Note:
Item 16D6 Recommendations portion of the Executive Summary should read: The Parks
and Recreation Advisory Board reviewed and approved the proposed fees at its *"°'TZiatLh 27,
2011 March 21.2012 meeting.
Commissioners will be attending lunch with the Know Your County Government Teen
Citizenship Program at the East Naples United Methodist Church from 12:00 to 1:00 p.m.
3/27/2012 8:30 AM
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the submittal of a grant application to the Federal Aviation
Administration in the amount of $725,000, subject to change based on RFP results, for the
design and bid of the restoration of Runway 9 -27 at the Immokalee Regional Airport.
OBJECTIVE: To submit a grant application to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for
the design and bid of the restoration of Runway 9 -27 at the Immokalee Regional Airport (IMM).
CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Airfield Pavement
Inspection conducted in March 2011 concluded that Runway 9 -27 at IMM is in "very poor"
condition. The results of the survey indicated that, on a numerical scale of 0 to 100, the
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) rating of Runway 9 -27 is 27, which represents "very poor"
condition and is below both the FDOT and Federal Aviation Administration General Aviation
Minimum PCI Recommendations.
Based on a pre -grant application submitted in January 2012, the FAA determined that the design
and bid of Runway 9 -27 restoration at IMM is eligible for ninety -five percent (95 %) funding
from the FAA in Fiscal Year 2013. The FAA requested that a grant application based on a
Request for Proposal (RFP) for the design and bid of Runway 9 -27 restoration be submitted in
April 2012.
The total estimated cost for the design and bid of IMM Runway 9 -27 restoration is $725,000.
The actual cost will be included in the application package after the RFPs are evaluated and a fee
is negotiated with the selected engineering consulting firm. Once the RFPs are received, there
likely will not be sufficient time for the grant application to be completed and approved by the
Board before it is due to the FAA.
If awarded a FAA grant, the Authority will request an additional two and one -half percent
(2.5 %) funding from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for this project.
This item will be brought back to the Board to accept the grant if the Airport Authority is offered
the grant.
FISCAL IMPACT: If the grant is awarded and accepted, grant revenue will be recognized in
the Airport Grant Fund (498). The estimated 2.5% local match requirement ($18,125) is
available within the Immokalee Development Center Fund (497) Reserves.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated
with the Board's approval to submit this grant application.
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION: At its March 5, 2012 meeting, the Airport
Authority Advisory Board voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners approve the submittal of a grant application to the FAA for the restoration of
Runway 9 -27 at IMM.
Packet Page -1166-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Executive Summary has been reviewed by the County
Attorney's Office, and has been found legally sufficient for Board action. A majority vote is
required for approval. — STW
RECOMMENDATION: To approve submittal of a grant application to the Federal Aviation
Administration in the estimated amount of $725,000, subject to change based on RFP results, for
the design and bid of the restoration of Runway 9 -27 at the Immokalee Regional Airport, and
authorize the Executive Director of the Airport Authority, Chris Curry, to execute all documents
necessary to submit the grant application.
PREPARED BY: Chris Curry, Executive Director, Airport Authority
Packet Page -1167-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 16.G.3.
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the submittal of a grant application to the
Federal Aviation Administration in the amount of $725,000, subject to change based on RFP
results, for the design and bid of the restoration of Runway 9 -27 at the Immokalee Regional
Airport.
Meeting Date: 3/27/2012
Prepared By
Name: BrueggemanDebra
Title: Operations Coordinator, Airport Authority
3/14/2012 2:48:15 PM
Submitted by
Title: Executive Director - Airport Authority,Airport Authority
Name: CurryChris
3/14/2012 2:48:17 PM
Approved By
Name: CurryChris
Title: Executive Director - Airport Authority,Airport Authority
Date: 3/15/2012 1:00:06 PM
Name: WilliamsSteven
Title: Assistant County Attorney,County Attorney
Date: 3/15/2012 1:20:55 PM
Name: Joshua Thomas
Title: Grants Support Specialist,
Date: 3/15/2012 3:52:24 PM
Name: StanleyTherese
Title: Management/Budget Analyst, Senior,Office of Management & Budget
Date: 3/16/2012 1:21:10 PM
Packet Page -1168-
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney
Date: 3/16/2012 2:59:00 PM
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Name: UsherSusan
Title: Management/Budget Analyst, Senior,Office of Manage
Date: 3/20/2012 1:17:15 PM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Director -Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs,CMO
Date: 3/20/2012 2:49:09 PM
Packet Page -1169-
o,10
v
Q
V
IJRPO*
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
COLLIER COUNTYAIRPORTAUTHORITY
y
2005 Mainsail Drive Ste. 9
2005 Mainsail Drive Ste.1
Naples, FL 34914 -8955
P.O. Box 889
(239) 642 -7878
Immakalae, FL 34142
Fax (239) 394 -3515
'V www.collieraviabon.com
January 30, 2012
Mrs. Krystal Ritchey
FAA Airport District Office
5950 Hazeltine National Drive
Suite 400
Orlando, FL 32822
Re: Project Pre - Application
Runway 9 -27 Pavement Restoration Design & Bid
Immokalee Regional Airport
Dear Mrs. Ritchey,
Enclosed is a list of the following:
1. Original and two (2) copies of a Project Application with all the required
attachments for the referenced project.
2. Letter of Credit Method of Payment is requested.
If you have any questions or need any additional information do not hesitate to
call.
Sincerely,
6/'JA� a
Chris Curry
Executive Director
Copy to: Kristi Smith, FDOT
Marco Island Executive Aupol
0 Immokalee Regional Airpoirt
Everglades Airpark
2005 Mainsail Drive Ste.1
165 Airpark Boulevard
P.O. Box 889
Naples, FL 34114-8955
Immakalae, FL 34142
650 E.C. Airpanc Road
(239) 394- 3355
(239) 657 -9003
Everglades City. FL 34139
(2391642 -5427 Fax
(239) 657-9191 Fax
(239) 69:,2778
(239) 695.3558 Fax
Packet Page -1170-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
PRE - APPLICATION CHECKLIST
I. AIRPORT: Immokalee Regional Airport (IMM)
LOCATION: Immokalee, Collier County FL
DATE OF REQUEST FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE: January 30, 2012
Following items to be completed by sponsor or consultant (If No [N] to any item, explain
the method of resolution on an attachment.
2. Front page SF 424 included?
Yes
3. Cost breakdown included?
Yes
4. Sketch included?
Yes
5. Exhibit "A" (if airport property interests have changed since last
N/A
grant)'?
6. Are plans and specifications in accordance with approved
Yes
environmental documents?
7. Is construction cost based on bids or land cost based on appraisals
N/A
or actual acquisition cost?
8. Has the FAA approved the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
Yes
Program
9. Is all work in the plans and specs requested to be included in the
Yes
rant?
10. Supporting documentation provided if project includes force
N/A
account?
11. Sponsor legally obligated to remove /relocate utility if included in
Yes
project?
12. Letter of Credit payment method requested?
Yes
Packet Page -1171-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
expvanon uate: 0313112012
Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
'1. Type of Submission:
'2. Type of Application • If Revision, select appropriate letter(s):
® Preapplication
® New
❑ Application
❑ Continuation 'Other (Specify)
❑ Changed /Corrected Application
❑ Revision
'3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier:
5a. Federal Entity Identifier:
'5b. Federal Award Identifier
State Use Only:
6. Date Received by State:
7. State Application Identifier:
8. APPLICANT INFORMATION:
'a. Legal Name: Collier County Board of County Commissioners
•b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN):
'c. Organizational DUNS:
59- 6000558
076997790
d. Address:
'Street 1: 2005 Mainsail Drive, Suite 1
Street 2:
'City: Naples
County: Collier
'State: Florida
Province:
'Country: USA
'Zip / Postal Code 34114
e. Organizational Unit:
Department Name:
Division Name:
Board of County Commissioners
Airport Authority - Immokalee Regional Airport
f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application:
Prefix: Mr. 'First Name: Thomas
Middle Name: Chris
'Last Name: Curry
Suffix:
Title: Executive Director
Organizational Affiliation:
'Telephone Number: (239) 642 -7878 Ext. 35 Fax Number: (239) 394 -3515
`Email: ChrisCurry®colliergov.net
Packet Page -1172-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
txpiration Date: 03/31/2012
Application for Federal Assistance SF -424
*9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type:
B.County Government
Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type:
Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type:
"Other (Specify)
*10. Name of Federal Agency:
Federal Aviation Administration
11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:
20.106
CFDA Title:
Airport Improvement Program
12. Funding Opportunity Number:
Title:
13. Competition Identification Number:
Title:
14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.):
Immokalee Regional Airport, Immokalee, Collier County, Florida
*15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project:
Immokalee Airport Runway 9 -27 Pavement Restoration Design & Bid: Develop plans and specifications, bid package and bid the
restoration of Runway 9 -27 at the Immokalee Regional Airport.
Packet Page -1173-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Expiration Date: 03/31/2012
Application for Federal Assistance SF -424
16. Congressional Districts Of:
*a. Applicant: 14 *b. Program/Project: 25
Attach an additional list of Program /Project Congressional Districts if needed.
17. Proposed Project:
*a. Start Date: 5/1/12 *b. End Date: 12/1/12
18. Estimated Funding ($):
*a. Federal $688,750
`b. Applicant $18,125
*c. State $18125
*d. Local
*e. Other
*f. Program Income
*g. TOTAL $725,000
*19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process?
❑ a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on
® b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review.
❑ c. Program is not covered by E. O. 12372
*20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes ", provide explanation.)
❑ Yes ® No
21. "By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications ** and (2) that the statements
herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances*" and agree to comply
with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject
me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U. S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001)
® **I AGREE
** The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or
agency specific instructions.
Authorized Representative:
Prefix: Mr. *First Name: Thomas
Middle Name: Chris
*Last Name: Curry
Suffix:
*Title: Executive Director
*Telephone Number. (239) 642 -7878 Ext. 35
Fax Number: (239) 3943515
` Email: ChrisCurry@colliergov.net
*Signature of Authorized Representative: "Date Signed: J 30 / Z.
Packet Page -1174-
Immokalee Regional Airport
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
RUNWAY 9 -27
ATTACHMENT "A"
Grant Pre - Application
Grant Description
I. Grant Description
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Prepare design plans and specifications, bid documents and bid the restoration of Runway
9 -27 at the Immokalee Regional Airport.
According to the most recent Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Statewide
Airfield Pavement Inspection, Runway 9 -27 at the Immokalee Airport is in "very poor"
condition. The PCI rating of 27 is below both the FDOT and Federal Aviation
Administration General Aviation Minimum PCI Ratings. See attached FDOT Statewide
Airfield Pavement Management Program Report for Immokalee Regional Airport dated
May 2011.
II. Cost Breakdown
GRANT OTHER
COST AMT (95 %) (5 %)
Design and Bid Runway Restoration $725,000 $688,750 $36,250
Packet Page -1175-
4 + •
�L 1.
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Airport: Immokalee Regional Airport
Detailed Project Description: Runway 9 -27 Pavement Restoration Desirn & Bid: Develop
plans and specifications, bid package and bid the restoration of Runway 9 -27 at the
Immokalee Regional Airport.
In order for the FAA to determine the appropriate course of action, the FAA must determine
and the sponsor must certify that the proposed action is not likely to:
a. Have an effect on properties protected under Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act
of 1966, as amended, Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, or
Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act;
b. Be highly controversial on environmental grounds. A proposed Federal action is
considered highly controversial when the action is opposed by a Federal, state or local
government agency or by a substantial number of persons affected by such action on
environmental grounds;
c. Have a significant impact on natural, ecological, cultural, or scenic resources of national,
state, or local significance, including endangered species, wetland, floodplains, coastal
zones, prime or unique farmland, energy supply and natural resources, or resources
protected by the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act;
d. Be highly controversial with respect to the availability of adequate relocation housing. In
an action involving relocation of persons or businesses, a controversy over the amount of
the acquisition or relocation payments is not considered to be a controversy with respect
to the availability of adequate relocation housing;
e. Cause substantial division or disruption of an established community, or disrupt orderly,
planned development, or is likely to be not reasonably consistent with plans or goals that
have been adopted by the community in which the project is located;
f. Have a significant environmental impact on minority or low - income populations;
g. Cause a significant increase in surface traffic congestion;
h. Have a significant impact on noise levels of noise sensitive areas;
i. Have a significant impact on water quality or contaminate a public water supply system;
j. Have a significant impact on air quality or violate the local, state or Federal standards of
air quality;
k. Be inconsistent with any Federal, state, or local law or administrative determination
relating to the environment.
Based on the attached Environmental Determination Checklist, I certify that the project(s)
described above meet(s) the test for a Categorical Exclusion in accordance with FAA Order
5050.4A and paragraphs a thru k above.
6�� " I 30 12-
Signature of Authoril Airport Representative Date
FAA Determination (by Program Man ager/Environmental Specialist signature):
Categorically Excluded: Date
Requires Further Environmental Analysis: Date
Packet Page -1177-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION CHECKLIST
Airport: Immokalee Regional Airport
Detailed description of Proposed Project: (attach drawing) Runway 9 -27 Pavement
Restoration Design & Bid: Develop plans and specifications, bid package and bid the
restoration of Runwav 4 -27 at the Immokalee Regional Aimort.
Prepared and certified by: C.TI/ (&L4 � Date: January 30, 2012
Attach detailed comments for all "yes" answers on a separate sheet, and explain your
justification for a request for a determination of Categorical Exclusion.
Packet Page -1178-
YES
NO
COMMENTS
IS THIS PROPOSED PROJECT LISTED AS
CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED IN FAA
ORDER 5050AA?
THIS PROPOSED PROJECT CONSISTS OF:
First Time ALP Approval
X
Commercial Service Airport Location Approval
X
New Air Carrier Runway
X
New Airport Location
X
New Runway
X
Runway Extension
X
Runway Strengthening w/ 1.5 DNL Increase
X
Construction or Relocation of a Roadway
X
Land Acquisition
X
ILS or ALS
X
THIS PROPOSED PROJECT WILL
AFFECT:
Section 4(f) Land
X
Historic/Archaeological Resources
X
Farmland
X
Wetlands
X
Flood plains
X
Coastal Zone
X
Endangered or Threatened Species
X
THIS PROPOSED PROJECT IS LIKELY TO:
Be Highly Controversial on Environmental
Grounds
X
Cause Natural Resource Impacts
X
Be Controversial Regarding Relocation Housing
X
Cause Community Disruption
X
Cause Surface Traffic Congestion
X
Cause Increase of 1.5 DNL over Noise Sensitive
Areas
X
Cause an Effect on Air Quality
X
Cause an Effect on Water Quality
X
Cause Environmental Justice Concerns
X
Contain or Affect Hazardous Materials
X
Be Inconsistent with Other Environmental Laws
X
Attach detailed comments for all "yes" answers on a separate sheet, and explain your
justification for a request for a determination of Categorical Exclusion.
Packet Page -1178-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
PROJECT: PAVEMENT REHABILITATION RUNWAY 9 -27
AIRPORT: IMMOKALEE REGIONAL AIRPORT
1. Objectives:
Prepare design plans and specifications, bid documents and bid the restoration of
Runway 9 -27 at the Immokalee Regional Airport.
2. Anticipated Benefits:
Significantly enhance safety by rehabilitating paved surfaces currently rated as being
in very poor condition by the Florida Department of Transportation Aviation Office.
3. Approach:
Consultants' and contractors' means and methods using standard design and
construction practices.
4. Geographic Location:
This project is for the Immokalee Regional Airport, located at 165 Airpark Boulevard,
Immokalee, Collier County, Florida.
5. Sponsor's Representative:
Chris Curry, Executive Director, Collier County Airport Authority
Packet Page -1179-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AVIATION OFFICE
Statewide Airfield Pavement
Management Program
Immokalee Regional Airport— IMM
(General Aviation)
Immokalee, Florida
(District 1)
May 2011
Packet Page -1180-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE NO.
ExecutiveSummary ............................................................................... ............................... iii
1. Introduction ..................................................................................... ............................... l
2. Network Definition and Pavement Inventory ................................. .............................10
3. Pavement Condition ........................................................................ .............................15
4. Pavement Condition Prediction ...................................................... .............................22
5. Maintenance Policies and costs ...................................................... .............................23
6. Pavement Rehabilitation Needs Analysis ....................................... .............................29
7. Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan ............................................. .............................33
8. Visual Aids ...................................................................................... .............................35
9. Recommendations ........................................................................... .............................36
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure1 -l: Pavement Life Cycle .............................................................. ..............................4
Figure1 -2: PCI Rating Scale .................................................................... ..............................6
Figure 2 -1: Pavement Area by Surface Type ........................................... .............................12
Figure 3 -1: Network PCI Distribution by Rating Category ..................... .............................18
Figure 3 -la: Condition Rating Summary ................................................. .............................18
Figure 3 -2: Percentage of Pavement Area within Each PCI Range by Pavement Use........ 19
Figure 4 -l: Predicted PCI by Pavement Use ........................................... .............................22
Figure 6 -1: Budget Scenario Analysis ..................................................... .............................32
LIST OF TABLES:
Table I: Condition Summary by Branch ................................................ ............................... iv
Table II: Condition Summary by Pavement Use ................................... ............................... iv
Table III: Condition Summary by Pavement Rank ................................ ............................... iv
Table IV: Immediate Major M &R Needs .............................................. ............................... vi
Table V: 10 -Year M &R Costs under Unlimited Funding Scenario ..... ............................... vii
Table 1 -l: Sampling Rate for FDOT Condition Surveys ......................... ..............................5
Table 2 -1: Construction Since Last Inspection & Anticipated Construction Activity .........11
Table 2 -2: Pavement Area by Pavement Use .......................................... .............................11
Table 2 -3: Branch and Section Inventory ................................................ .............................13
Table 3 -1: Pavement Distresses for Asphalt Concrete Surfaces .............. .............................15
Table 3 -2: Pavement Distresses for Portland Cement Concrete Surfaces ............................16
Table 3 -3: Condition by Pavement Use ................................................... .............................19
Table 5 -1: Routine Maintenance Activities for Airfield Pavements ....... .............................24
Table 5 -2: Critical PCI for General Aviation Airports ............................ .............................25
Table 5 -3: FDOT Minimum Service Level PCI for General Aviation Airports ...................25
Table 5 -4: M &R Activities for General Aviation Airports ..................... .............................26
Table 5 -5: Maintenance Unit Costs for FDOT ........................................ .............................27
Table 5 -6: M &R Activities and Unit Costs by Condition for General Aviation Airports ... 28
Table 6 -1: Summary of Immediate Major M &R Needs .......................... .............................30
Packet Page -1181-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE NO.
Table 6 -2: Summary of Year 1 Maintenance Activities .......................... .............................31
Table 7 -1: M &R Costs under Unlimited Funding Scenario .................... .............................33
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Network Definition Map
System Inventory Map
Pavement Inventory Table
Work History Report
Appendix B
2011 Condition Map
Pavement Condition Index Table
Appendix C
Branch Condition Report
Section Condition Report
Appendix D
Pavement Condition Prediction Table
Predicted PCI by Pavement Use Graph
Appendix E
Year 1 Maintenance Activities Table
Appendix F
Major M &R Plan by Year under Unlimited Funding Scenario Table
Appendix G
10 -Year M &R Map
Appendix H
Photographs
Appendix I
PCI Re- inspection Report
Packet Page -1182-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report - Immokalee Regional Ai7port
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2010, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Aviation Office selected a Consultant
team consisting of Kimley -Horn and Associates and their Subconsultants, MACTEC
Engineering and Consulting and All About Pavements, Inc., to provide services in support of
FDOT in the continuing evaluation and updating of the existing Statewide Airfield Pavement
Management Program (SAPMP) to be completed over fiscal years 2011 and 2012.
The tasks required to achieve this objective at Immokalee Regional Airport included:
➢ Obtain recent construction history from the Airport to update the Pavement Inventory
CADD drawings from the previous SAPMP update,
➢ Perform a visual Pavement Condition Index (PCI) survey of the airfield pavements at
the Airport,
➢ Update the MicroPAVER database to analyze the PCI field data and determine the
current condition of the airfield pavements,
➢ Predict the future deterioration of the pavements,
➢ Develop a 10 -year M &R plan to address the pavement needs at Immokalee Regional
Airport, and
➢ Provide the estimated costs associated with the suggested immediate and future M &R
activities
During March 2011, the PCI survey was performed at Immokalee Regional Airport. The results
of the survey indicate that, based on a numerical scale of 0 to 100, the overall area - weighted
average PCI of the airfield pavements in 2011 is 36, representing a Very Poor overall network
condition.
Table I below summarizes the overall condition summary by network branch.
Packet Page -1183-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table I: Condition Summary by Branch
Branch Name
Area
Weighted
PCI
Condition
Rating
FDOT
Minimum
Service Level
MicroPAVER
Minimum
PCI
Action
Required
Apron to Hangars
93
Good
60
65
Good
Apron Run -Up at RW 36
87
Good
60
65
South Apron and Fueling Ramp
88
Good
60
65
Crop Apron
39
Very Poor
60
65
X
Runway 18 -36
28
Very Poor
75
65
X
Runway 4 -22 (Former)
34
Very Poor
75
65
X
Runway 9 -27
27
Very Poor
75
65
X
Taxiway Alpha
25
Serious
65
65
X
Taxiway Bravo
30
Very Poor
65
65
X
Taxiway Bravo 1
30
Very Poor
65
65
X
Taxiway Charlie
91
Good
65
65
Taxiway to Crop Apron
67
Fair
65
65
Tables II and III below illustrate the area- weighted PCI computed individually for each
pavement use and rank, respectively.
Table II: Condition Summary by Pavement Use
Use
Average Area-
Weighted PCI
Condition Rating
Runway
28
Very Poor
Taxiway
37
Very Poor
Apron
86
Good
All (Weighted)
36
Very Poor
Table III: Condition Summary by Pavement Rank
Rank*
Average Area-
Weighted PCI
Condition Rating
Primary
36
Very Poor
Secondary
36
Very Poor
Tertiary
73
Satisfactory
All (Weighted)
36
Very Poor
*The pavement rank for the airport pavement network is listed on Table 2 -3.
iv
Packet Page -1184-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
The immediate M &R needs, or needs that have been programmed to be completed in the first
year of the 10 -year M &R plan based on an unlimited budget at Immokalee Regional Airport,
include: Runway 9 -27, Runway 18 -36, Taxiway Alpha, and Taxiway Bravo. Runways 9 -27 and
18 -36 exhibited low to medium severity distresses of block cracking, weathering, and raveling
that attributed to the age of the pavement. Both runways, based on the determined PCI will
benefit from a full depth pavement reconstruction. Similarly, Taxiway Alpha and Taxiway Bravo
exhibited the same range of distresses that would benefit from pavement section reconstruction.
The immediate needs are summarized in Table IV below.
V
Packet Page -1185-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table IV: Immediate Major M &R Needs
Project
Year
Branch Name
Section
ID
Surface
Type
Section
Area
(ft')
Major M &R
Costs*
PCI
Before
M &R
M &R Activity
PCI
After
M &R
2011
Crop Apron
4105
AC
10,000
$70,230.01
39
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 18 -36
6105
PCC
30,000
$408,600.13
27
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 18 -36
6110
PCC
15,000
$204,300.07
30
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 18 -36
6115
AC
422,500
$5,754,451.87
28
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 18 -36
6120
AC
211,250
$2,877,225.93
29
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 18 -36
6125
PCC
30,000
$408,600.13
17
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 18 -36
6130
PCC
15,000
$204,300.07
23
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 4 -22
6305
PCC
15,000
$138,330.04
36
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 4 -22
6310
PCC
35,000
$348,425.09
35
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 4 -22
6325
PCC
35,000
$476,700.15
30
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 4 -22
6330
PCC
15,000
$171,315.06
33
Reconstruction
100
2011
Rimwav 9 -27
6205
PCC
15.000
$204.300.07
28
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 9 -27
6210
PCC
7,500
$102,150.03
25
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 9 -27
6215
AC
420,500
$5,727,211.86
28
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 9 -27
6220
AC
210,250
$2,863,605.93
28
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 9 -27
6225
PCC
30,000
$408,600.13
26
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 9 -27
6230
PCC
15,000
$204,300.07
4
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Alpha
205
AC
277,550
$3,780,232.23
25
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Alpha 1
210
AC
23,450
$319,389.10
26
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Alpha 2
220
AC
23,450
$319,389.10
22
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Bravo
105
AC
117,050
$1,594,221.52
26
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Bravo
110
AC
132,650
$1,417,763.62
34
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Bravo
115
AC
10,000
$114,210.04
33
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Bravo 1
405
AC
33,000
$352,704.10
34
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Bravo 1
410
AC
69,493
$946,494.97
28
Reconstruction
100
Total
$29,417,051.32
28
100
* Costs are adjusted for inflation.
A forecast of Major M &R needs for a 10 -year period, starting from 2011, was developed using
an unlimited budget. The analysis identified ongoing maintenance needs and major M &R during
that interval. The results of this analysis are provided in Table V below.
Vi
Packet Page -1186-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table V: 10 -Year M &R Costs under Unlimited Funding Scenario
Year
Preventative
Major M &R
Total Year
Cost
2011
$20,957.69
$29,417,051.31
$29,438,009.00
2012
$29,447.90
$0.00
$29,447.90
2013
$26,966.46
$86,921.18
$113,887.64
2014
$35,170.20
$0.00
$35,170.20
2015
$42,660.34
$0.00
$42,660.34
2016
$43,064.93
$171,691.73
$214,756.66
2017
$56,853.78
$0.00
$56,853.78
2018
$89,850.10
$0.00
$89,850.10
2019
$153,829.30
$0.00
$153,829.30
2020
$195,910.68
$0.00
$195,910.68
Total
$694,711.38
$29,675,664.22
$30,370,375.60
Note: Costs are adjusted for inflation.
The implementation of the 10 -Year Major M &R Plan is expected to provide an improvement in
the overall condition of the airfield pavement, where the area- weighted PCI would increase from
36 in 2011 to 84 in 2020. Appendix F lists the Major M &R for the 10 -Year program. Appendix
G graphically depicts the program activity.
It is important to note that although preventative and some major M &R activities would have to
be conducted over several years, the area- weighted PCI value for all Immokalee Regional
Airport pavements in 2020 may remain near 84. The airport manager should realize that what is
most important is that the pavement repair work (preventative and major M &R) that has been
identified for Immokalee Regional Airport is conducted at some point in the 10 -year plan.
Vii
Packet Page -1187-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
1. INTRODUCTION
The State of Florida has more than 100 public airports that are vital to the Florida economy as
well as the economy of the United States. There are millions of square yards of pavement for the
runways, taxiways, aprons and other areas of these airports that support aircraft operations. The
timely and proper maintenance and rehabilitation (M &R) of these pavements allows the airports
to operate efficiently, economically and without excessive down time.
In order to support the planning, scheduling, and design of the M &R activities based on
pavement evaluation and pavement management performance trends, the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) Aviation Office implemented the Statewide Airfield Pavement
Management Program (SAPMP) in 1992.
In 2010, the FDOT Aviation Office selected a Consultant team consisting of Kimley -Horn and
Associates and their Subconsultants, MACTEC Engineering and Consulting and All About
Pavements, Inc., to provide services in support of FDOT in the continuing evaluation and
updating of the existing SAPMP to be completed over fiscal years 2011 and 2012.
This report discusses the work performed, a summary of the findings, results, and
recommendations for M &R planning associated with the update to the SAPMP. It also describes
the procedures used to ensure that the appropriate engineering and scientific standards of care,
quality, budget, and schedule requirements are implemented during the performance of the
SAPMP.
1.1 Purpose
This Florida Airport Pavement Evaluation Report is intended to:
• Describe, briefly, the SAPMP and the roles and responsibilities of the program's
participants;
• Provide background information on pavement management principles, objectives, and
benefits to this airport;
• Outline the procedures used to collect, evaluate and report pavement inspection
results at this airport;
■ Present the findings from the pavement inspection;
■ Analyze and discuss the needs for Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M &R) activities
and associated costs for this airport.
1.2 FDOT Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program
In 1992, the FDOT implemented the SAPMP to improve the knowledge of pavement conditions
at public airports in the State system, identify maintenance needs at individual airports, automate
information management, and establish standards to address future needs. The 1992 SAPMP
provided valuable information for establishing and performing pavement M &R.
In 1992/1993, and 1998/1999, the FDOT Aviation Office participated in the development of a
proprietary software pavement management system and developed and populated a pavement
management database that provided valuable information for establishing M &R policies,
estimating M &R costs, and developing recommendations for performing routine pavement
maintenance. This system, AIRPAV, was implemented, and initial condition surveys were
Packet Page -1188-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report Immokalee Regional Ai1port
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
performed in 1992 and 1993. The SAPMP was updated with additional surveys in 1998 and
1999.
In 2004, the FDOT Aviation Office undertook a project to update the pavement management
system software utilized for the SAPMP. This project involved a review of the AIRPAV
software and other available pavement management system software. As a result of this review,
MicroPAVER was selected as the software for the update project. Data from the 1998/1999
condition surveys were converted to the MicroPAVER system, and the inventory of the
pavement systems and drawings of the pavements were updated to reflect maintenance,
rehabilitation, and construction activities since 1998/1999. The pavements were inspected
between 2006 and 2008, and an updated M &R program was developed based on the new
condition of the airfield pavements. As part of the update, procedures for the inspection and
collection of pavement data were developed, and a website (www.floridaairportpavement.com)
was created for the input of data under secure procedures.
Currently, airports using the AIP Grant Program are required by the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) to develop a pavement maintenance program (FAA/AC 150/5380 -613
"Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements ") using trained personnel to
perform a detailed inspection of airfield pavements. The inspections are required to be
performed at least once a year or every 3 years if pavement inspection is characterized in the
form of a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) survey (such as ASTM D 5340 "Standard Test
Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys ", (2004 edition)). The 2004 edition was
utilized in lieu of the 2010 edition to maintain database integrity and benefit of pavement
performance curves from the previous inspections.
In 2010, the FDOT Aviation Office selected a team consisting of the Consultant and their
Subconsultants to provided services in support of FDOT in the continuing evaluation and
updating of the existing SAPMP to be completed over fiscal years 2011 and 2012.
1.3 Organization
1.3.1 Aviation Office Program Manager Role
The Aviation Office Airport Engineering Manager serves as the Aviation Office Program
Manager (AO -PM) monitoring the work of the Consultant. The AO -PM has review and approval
authority for each program task and also manages the day -to -day details of the SAPMP and the
updates.
1.3.2 Consultant Role
The Consultant (Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.) and their Subconsultants (MACTEC
Engineering and Consulting and All About Pavements, Inc.) provide technical and administrative
assistance to the AO -PM during the execution of this program, which involves the continuing
evaluation of airport pavements and updating of the SAPMP based upon procedures outlined in
FAA Advisory Circular 150/5380 -6B "Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport
Pavements" and ASTM D 5340 "Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index
Surveys" (2004).
2
Packet Page -1189-
3/27/2012 ItE-IM 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Air port
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
1.3.3 Airport Role
The airports are the ultimate client for each of the field inspections and reports. Individual
airports will be provided final deliverables prepared by the Consultant that have been reviewed
and approved by the AO -PM. The airport should provide a current Airport Layout Plan (ALP) to
the Consultant and, if they participated in the previous SAPMP update, indicate any construction
activity that has been performed since the previous inspections.
1.4 Pavement Types and Pavement Management
1.4.1 Pavement basics
A pavement is a prepared surface designed to provide a continuous smooth ride at a certain speed
and to support an estimated amount of traffic for a certain number of years. Pavements are
constructed of a combination of subgrade soils, subbases, bases and surfacing. There are mainly
two types of pavements;
Flexible pavement, composed of an asphalt concrete (AC) surface, and
Rigid pavement composed of a Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) surface.
Both pavement types use a combination of layered materials and thicknesses in order to support
the traffic loads and protect the underlying natural subgrade soil. Flexible pavements (AC)
dissipate the load from layer to layer until the load magnitude is small enough to be supported by
the subgrade soil. In rigid pavements (PCC), the Portland Cement Concrete supports most of the
load, and the base or subbase layer is mainly constructed to provide a smooth and continuous
platform for the construction of the concrete surface.
A small percentage of the airport pavements in Florida are composed of asphalt concrete surface
over Portland Cement Concrete (APC). This pavement type is known as "composite" pavement.
Due to the different nature of the pavement types and their materials, flexible and rigid
pavements have different distresses and failure mechanisms. Understanding the mechanics and
failure modes of both pavement types will assist engineers in making adequate and long lasting
repairs or rehabilitation to the pavement structures.
1.4.2 Pavement Management System Concept
The SAPMP utilized a Pavement Management System (PMS) to develop the M &R
recommendations discussed in this report. A PMS is a tool to assist engineers, planners and
managing agencies in making decisions when planning pavement M &R. The management of
pavements involves scheduling pavement maintenance and rehabilitation before pavements
deteriorate to a condition where reconstruction (the most expensive alternative) is the only
solution. Figure 1 -1 below, taken from FAA/AC 5380 -7A "Airport Pavement Management
Program ", illustrates how a pavement generally deteriorates and the relative cost of rehabilitation
at various times throughout its life. Note that during the first 75 percent of a pavement's life, it
performs relatively well. After that, however, it begins to deteriorate rapidly. The number of
years a pavement stays in "good" condition depends on how well it is maintained. As the
illustration demonstrates, the cost of maintaining the pavement above a critical condition before
rapid deterioration occurs is much less compared to maintaining pavements after substantial
deterioration has occurred.
Packet Page -1190-
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Figure 1 -1: Pavement Life Cycle
GOOD
SATISFACTORY
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
$1.00 FOR
FAIR REHABILIATION
i HERE
POOR
SIGNIFICANT DROP
VERY POOR IN CONDITION r WILL COST
�L TO $10.00"
HERE
SERIOUS 1 SMALL %
PAVEMENT LIFE
FAILED
TIME
Source: FAA /AC 150/5380 -7A "Airport Pavement Management Program"
*Modified to reflect current construction costs.
Pavements deteriorate at an accelerated rate with increasing traffic and limited M &R resources.
Planned maintenance and rehabilitation, essentially preventing pavements from reaching
deteriorated conditions, helps managers /owners /agencies maximize the use of their budgets and
prolong the life of the pavements. A PMS provides a tool to schedule and plan maintenance and
rehabilitation based on engineering information and existing and predicted conditions of
pavements.
There are several components or elements that are essential to a PMS. The first steps in the
implementation of a PMS are to know and clearly identify what needs to be managed, the limits
of the managing agency's responsibilities and the condition of the existing pavements. Once the
cause and the extent of pavement problems are known, the appropriate maintenance and/or
rehabilitation can be planned. By using local unit costs and expected yearly budgets, a multi-
year M &R plan can be determined.
1.4.3 Pavement Inspection Methodology for the SAPMP
Pavement condition assessment is one of the primary decision variables in any airport PMS.
Pavement condition assessments generally include visual surveys in accordance with ASTM D
5340, "Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys" and structural
evaluation. Pavement condition surveys assess the functional condition of the pavement surface.
Typically, most problems within a pavement structure will eventually reflect to the pavement
surface. The structural condition and relative support of the pavement layers can be assessed
utilizing non - destructive deflection testing (NDT) as well as other in -depth engineering
evaluation or sampling and testing methods.
4
Packet Page -1191-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
For the Statewide Aviation Pavement Management Program update, only visual surveys were
performed. Further structural and geotechnical testing should be conducted to determine the
appropriate rehabilitation methods during the design process.
In preparation of the PCI surveys, the airfield pavements are divided into sample units as
established in FAA AC 150/5380 -6B and ASTM D 5340. Further discussion of how the airport
pavements are divided and subdivided into units by construction and use can be found in Section
2 "Network Definition and Pavement Inventory" of this report.
Sample unit sizes are approximately 5000 ± 2000 square feet for AC- surfaced pavements and 20
± 8 slabs for PCC- surfaced pavements. Prior to conducting the field inspections, the sampling
plan was developed based on previous sampling and modified based on the available knowledge
of Branches, Sections, use patterns, construction types and history. The sampling rate used for
the FDOT Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program is provided in Table 1 -1 below.
Table 1 -1: Sampling Rate for FDOT Condition Surveys
AC Pavements
PCC Pavements
N
n
N
n
Runwa
Others
Runway
Others
1 -4
1
1
1 -3
1
1
5 -10
2
1
4 -6
2
1
11 -15
3
2
7 -10
3
2
16 -30
5
3
11 -15
4
2
31 -40
7
4
16 -20
5
3
41 -50
8
5
21 -30
7
3
>51
20% but <20
10% but <10
31 -40
8
4
41 -50
10
5
>51
20% but <20
10% but <10
Where N = total number of sample units in Section
n = number of sample units to inspect
The sample units to inspect are determined by a systematic random sampling technique. This
means that the locations are determined such that they are distributed evenly throughout the
Section. In the case when nonrepresentive distresses are observed in the field, additional sample
units were added.
The distress quantities and severity levels from the sample units are used to compute the PCI
value for each Section. PCI values range from 0 to 100. As Figure 1 -2 below indicates,
MicroPAVER provides a rating scale that relates PCI to pavement condition. A PCI between 0
and 10 is considered `Failed' pavement, and a PCI between 86 and 100 is considered `Good'
pavement, with five other conditions for PCI values between 11 and 85.
Packet Page -1192-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Figure 1 -2: PCI Rating Scale
1.5 Definitions
Aviation Office - The Aviation Office is charged with responsibility for promoting the safe
development of aviation to serve the people of the State of Florida. The Aviation Office Program
Manager (AO -PM) has review and approval authority for each program task of the SAPMP.
Base Course - Base Course is a layer of manufactured material, usually crushed rock (aggregate)
or stabilized material (asphalt or concrete or Florida Limerock), immediately beneath the surface
course of a pavement, which provides support to the surface course.
Branch - A Branch designates pavements that have common usage and functionality, such as an
entire runway, taxiway, or apron.
Branch ID - A short form identification for the pavement Branch. In this report, Branch includes
the common designation for the item e.g. RW 18 -36.
Category - The Category classifies the airport according to the type and volume of aircraft
traffic, as follows:
• GA - for general aviation or community airports;
• RL - for regional relievers or small hubs;
• PR - for primary (certified under Part 139 requirements).
Critical Cl P - The PCI value considered to be the threshold for M &R decisions. PCI above the
Critical generate economical activities expected to preserve and prolong acceptable condition.
M &R for PCI values less than Critical make sense only for reasons of safety or to maintain a
pavement in operable condition. A pavement section is expected to deteriorate very quickly
once it reaches the Critical PCI and the unit cost of repair increases significantly.
Distress Type - A distress type is a defined visible defect in pavement evidenced by cracking,
vertical displacement or deterioration of material. In PCI technology, 16 distinct distress types
for asphalt surfaced and 15 for Portland Cement Concrete surfaced pavements have been
described and rated according to the impact their presence has on pavement condition.
6
Packet Page -1193-
PCI
Condition Rating
86-100
Good
71-85
Satisfactory
56-70
Fair
41-55
Poor
26-40
Very Poor
11-25
Serious
0-10
Failed
1.5 Definitions
Aviation Office - The Aviation Office is charged with responsibility for promoting the safe
development of aviation to serve the people of the State of Florida. The Aviation Office Program
Manager (AO -PM) has review and approval authority for each program task of the SAPMP.
Base Course - Base Course is a layer of manufactured material, usually crushed rock (aggregate)
or stabilized material (asphalt or concrete or Florida Limerock), immediately beneath the surface
course of a pavement, which provides support to the surface course.
Branch - A Branch designates pavements that have common usage and functionality, such as an
entire runway, taxiway, or apron.
Branch ID - A short form identification for the pavement Branch. In this report, Branch includes
the common designation for the item e.g. RW 18 -36.
Category - The Category classifies the airport according to the type and volume of aircraft
traffic, as follows:
• GA - for general aviation or community airports;
• RL - for regional relievers or small hubs;
• PR - for primary (certified under Part 139 requirements).
Critical Cl P - The PCI value considered to be the threshold for M &R decisions. PCI above the
Critical generate economical activities expected to preserve and prolong acceptable condition.
M &R for PCI values less than Critical make sense only for reasons of safety or to maintain a
pavement in operable condition. A pavement section is expected to deteriorate very quickly
once it reaches the Critical PCI and the unit cost of repair increases significantly.
Distress Type - A distress type is a defined visible defect in pavement evidenced by cracking,
vertical displacement or deterioration of material. In PCI technology, 16 distinct distress types
for asphalt surfaced and 15 for Portland Cement Concrete surfaced pavements have been
described and rated according to the impact their presence has on pavement condition.
6
Packet Page -1193-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — 1mmokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Florida DOT (FDOT) - Florida Department of Transportation was represented in this project by
the Office of Aviation.
Global M &R - Global M &R is defined as activities applied to entire pavement Sections with the
primary objective of slowing the rate of deterioration. These activities are primary for asphalt
surfaced pavements, e.g. surface treatments.
Localized M &R (Maintenance and Repair) - Localized M &R is a temporizing activity performed
on existing pavement to extend its serviceability and/or to improve rideability. Localized M &R
can be applied either as a safety (stop -gap) measure or preventive measure. Common localized
maintenance methods include crack sealing, joint sealing, and patching.
Maior M &R (e.g. Rehabilitation) - Activities performed over the entire area of a pavement
Section that are intended to restore and/or maintain serviceability. This includes asphalt
overlays, milling and replacing asphalt pavement, reconstruction with asphalt, reconstruction
with Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavements, and PCC overlays.
MicroPAVER - A commercially available software subsidized by FAA and agencies in the US
Department of Defense developed to support engineered management of pavement assets using a
condition based approach. This software has the functionality such that, if properly
implemented, maintained, and operated, it meets the pavement management program
requirements described by the FAA in Advisory Circular 150/5380 -7A.
Minimum Condition Level - A threshold PCI value established by FDOT to represent the
targeted minimum pavement condition that is desirable in the Florida Airport System. These
values were established with consideration of pavement function and airport type. For instance,
runways have higher minimum condition levels than aprons, and Primary airports have higher
minimum condition levels than General Aviation airports.
Network Definition - A Network Definition is a Computer -Aided Drafting & Design (CADD)
drawing which shows the airport pavement outline with Branch and Section boundaries. This
drawing also includes the PCI sample units and is used to identify those sample units to be
surveyed, i.e. the sampling plan. The Network Definition for the airport is in Appendix A along
with a table of inventory data.
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) - The Pavement Condition Index is a number which represents
the condition of a pavement segment at a specific point in time. It is based on visual
identification and measurement of specific distress types commonly found in pavement which
has been in service for a period of time. The definitions and procedures for determining the PCI
are found in ASTM D 5340, published by ASTM International.
Pavement Evaluation - A systematic approach undertaken by trained and experienced personnel
intended for determination of the condition, serviceability, and best corrective action for
pavement. Techniques to standardize pavement evaluation include the Pavement Condition
Index procedures.
Pavement Management System (PMS) - A Pavement Management System is a broad function
that uses pavement evaluation and pavement performance trends as a basis for planning,
programming, financing, and maintaining a pavement system.
7
Packet Page -1194-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Pavement Surface Tyne - The surface of pavement is identified as one of four types:
• AC — for asphalt surface pavements;
• PCC — for Portland Cement Concrete pavements;
• AAC — for asphalt surface pavements that have had an asphalt overlay at some point
in their construction history;
• APC — for composite pavements, which consist of asphalt over Portland Cement
Concrete pavement.
• PAC — for composite pavements, which consist of Portland Cement Concrete over
asphalt pavement.
Rank - Pavement rank in MicroPAVER determines the priority to be assigned to a pavement
Section when developing an M &R plan. Pavement Sections are ranked as follows according to
their use:
• P — for Primary pavements, such as primary runways, primary taxiways, and primary
aprons;
• S — or Secondary pavements, such as secondary runways, secondary taxiways, and
secondary aprons;
• T — for Tertiary pavements such as "T" hangars and slightly used aprons.
Reconstruction - Reconstruction includes removal of existing pavement, preparation of subgrade,
and construction of new pavement with new or recycled materials. Reconstruction is indicated
when distress types evident at the surface indicate failure in the pavement structure or subgrade
of a type, and to an extent, not correctable by less extensive construction.
Rehabilitation - Rehabilitation represents construction using existing pavement for a foundation.
Rehabilitation most commonly consists of an overlay of existing pavement with a new asphalt or
concrete surface. Recently, technology has expanded the options to include recycling of existing
pavement and incorporating engineering fabrics or thin layers of elasticized materials to retard
reflection of distress types through the new surface.
Sample Unit - Uniformly sized portions of a Section as defined in ASTM D 5340. Sample units
are a means to reduce the total amount of pavement actually surveyed using statistics to select
and survey enough area to provide a representative measure of Section PCI. Sample Unit sizes
are 5,000 ± 2,000 square feet for AC- surfaced pavements and 20 t 8 slabs for PCC- surfaced
pavements.
Section - Sections subdivide Branches into portions of similar pavement. Sections are prescribed
by pavement structure, age, condition, and use. Sections are identified on the airport Network
Definition. They are the smallest unit used for determining M &R requirements based on
condition.
Section ID - A short form identification for the pavement Section that maintains the original
AirPAV identification where 100 series through 3000 series Sections are taxiways, 4000 and
5000 series Sections are aprons (the 5000 series represent run -up aprons and turnarounds), and
6000 series Sections are runways.
Statewide Airfield Pavement Management Program. (SAPMP) — The Statewide Airfield
Pavement Management Program is a program implemented in 1992 by the Florida Department
of Transportation to plan, schedule, and design the maintenance and rehabilitation activities
8
Packet Page -1195-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
necessary for the airfield pavement on Florida's public airports to allow the airports to operate
efficiently, economically, and without excessive down time.
System Inventory - A System Inventory is a Computer -Aided Drafting & Design (CADD)
drawing which shows the airport pavement outline and identifies airfield construction activities
since the last inspection. The System Inventory for the airport is included in Appendix A.
Use - In MicroPAVER, Use is the term for the function of the pavement area. This is either
Runway, Taxiway, or Apron for purposes of the FDOT Statewide Aviation Pavement
Management System.
9
Packet Page -1196-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
2. NETWORK DEFINITION AND PAVEMENT INVENTORY
Immokalee Regional Airport (IMM), consists of two runways; RW 18 -36, which is 150 -ft wide
by 5,000 -ft long and RW 9 -27, which is 150 -ft wide by 5,000 -ft long. Inactive RW 4 -22 is
currently fenced off from the rest of the airfield and being used as a drag strip. Taxiways Alpha
and Bravo are each 50 -ft wide and are used to direct traffic to and from the active runways.
Currently the airport has multiple T- Hangar facilities located on the south east side of the airport
and tie -down spaces located throughout the apron. The runways are mostly constructed out of
Asphalt Concrete pavement with exception to 300 -ft sections of Portland Cement Concrete
located at each end of all of the runways. All of the pavement throughout the taxiways, hangars
and apron is constructed out of Asphalt Concrete pavement.
It is important to note that the aforementioned runway data in addition to the remaining airfield
pavement facilities geometric dimensions may vary slightly from the geometry used in the
condition and M &R analysis based on field measurements.
Established as Immokalee Army Airfield and activated in 1942, Immokalee Regional Airport
was assigned to the US Army Air Forces East Coast Training Center. IMM was an auxiliary to
Hendricks Army Airfield and was an AAF Specialized Pilot Training School. With the
drawdown to the pilot training program in 1944, the airfield was transferred to the Third Air
Force. Immokalee Regional Airport was turned over to the Army Corps of Engineers in 1945 and
eventually discharged to the War Assets Administration. From there Immokalee Regional
Airport became a civil which is currently owned and operated by Collier County.
This airport is designated as a General Aviation airport and is located in District 1 of the Florida
Department of Transportation.
2.1 Network Definition
The pavements within the network are defined in MicroPAVER in terms of manageable units
that help to organize the data into similar groups. An organizational hierarchy is used to
establish these units.
2.1.1 Branch Section Identification
The airport pavement network is subdivided into separate Branches (runways, taxiways, or
aprons) that have distinctly different uses. Branches are then further divided into Sections with
similar pavement construction and performance that may share other common attributes.
Sections are manageable units used to organize the data collection and are treated individually
during the rehabilitation planning stage. A pavement rank, consisting of primary, secondary, and
tertiary levels, is assigned to each Section based on their level and type of use. The pavement
rankings that were designated for each Section in the previous SAPMP update were again used
for this update.
As discussed in Section 1.4.3 "Pavement Inspection Methodology for the SAPMP", the sections
are sub - divided into sample units, which are the smallest subdivision in a pavement network,
only for the purpose of conducting the pavement condition survey.
10
Packet Page -1197-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Air port
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
2.1.2 System Inventory and Network Definition Update
The System Inventory and Network Definition drawings are used to identify changes in the
network since the most recent update from the 2006/2008 inspections and also to plan the field
inspection activities for the 2011 survey. Prior to the field inspection process, the System
Inventory drawing was updated from the previous inspection with notes indicating recent
construction projects on the various Sections of pavement throughout the airfield. This System
Inventory drawing is used to update the Network Definition drawing.
The Network Definition drawing shows the airport pavement outline with Branch and Section
boundaries. This drawing also includes the PCI sample units and is used to identify those sample
units to be surveyed, i.e. the sampling plan. The previous airport configuration and history was
compared with the current airport configuration, and the existing network branch, section and
sample unit designations were revised to match the current configuration. This drawing serves
not only as a primary guide for the airfield inspectors but also as an important historical record.
The updated System Inventory and Network Definition drawings for Immokalee Regional
Airport are provided in Appendix A. Table 2 -1 below lists the recent construction projects at the
airport.
Table 2 -1: Construction Since Last Inspection & Anticipated Construction
Activity
Construction
Location
Work Type / Pavement Section
Year
1,522,000
59%
2006
Aron
Expansion
2006
Taxiway Charlie
Pavement Rehabilitation
2.2 Pavement Inventory
The detailed pavement inventory was updated to reflect the network definition update and field
inspection results.
The total airfield pavement area in 2011 at Immokalee Regional Airport is 2,593,597 square feet.
The breakdown of pavement area for each pavement use is provided in Table 2 -2.
Table 2 -2: Pavement Area by Pavement Use
Use
Area (ft)
% of Total Area
Runway
1,522,000
59%
Taxiway
824,018
32%
Apron
247,579
10%
All (Weighted)
2,593,597
100%
11
Packet Page -1198-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Figure 2 -1 presents the breakdown of the pavement area at Immokalee Regional Airport by
surface type.
Figure 2 -1: Pavement Area by Surface Type
10%
90%
MAC - Asphalt
Concrete Pavement
13PCC - Portland
Cement Concrete
Details of pavement Branch and Section information including Branch name (which indicates
pavement use), Branch ID, Section ID, section area, rank, surface type, last construction date,
number of samples inspected, and number of samples in each Section are given in Table 2 -3
below. A more detailed Pavement Inventory Table may be found in Appendix A of this report.
12
Packet Page -1199-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 2 -3: Branch and Section Inventory
Branch Name
Branch ID
Section
ID
True
Area (ft)
Section
Rank
Surface
Type
Last
Const.
Date
Total
Samples
Inspected
Total
Samples
A ron to Hangars
AP HANG
4405
22,500
P
AC
1/1/1998
1
4
Apron Run-up RW 36
AP RU RW36
4305
8,000
P
AC
1/1/1998
1
1
Apron Run-up RW 36
AP RU RW36
4310
6,309
P
AC
1/1/2001
0
1
Apron Run-up RW 36
AP RU RW36
4315
18,752
N
AC
1/1/2002
1
1
South Apron and Fueling Rams
AP S
4205
28,000
P
AC
1/1/1997
1
5
South Apron and Fueling Rams
AP S
4210
63,618
P
AC
1/1/1998
2
5
South Apron and Fueling Rams
AP S
4215
54,400
P
AC
7/31/2007
0
11
South Apron and Fueling Rams
AP S
4220
36,000
P
AC
7/31/2007
0
7
Crop Apron
CROP AP
4105
10,000
P
AC
1/1/1987
1
2
Runway 18 -36
RW 18 -36
6105
30,000
P
PCC
1/1/1942
2
6
Runwa 18 -36
RW 18 -36
6110
15,000
P
PCC
1/1/1942
1
3
Runway 18 -36
RW 18 -36
6115
422,500
P
AC
1/1/1942
17
106
Runway 18 -36
RW 18 -36
6120
211,250
P
AC
1/1/1942
8
53
Runway 18 -36
RW 18 -36
6125
30,000
P
PCC
1/1/1942
2
6
Runway 18 -36
RW 18 -36
6130
15,000
P
PCC
1/1/1942
1
3
.,way 4 -22
RW 4 -22
6305
15,000
S
PCC
1/1/1942
1
1
Runway 4 -22
RW 4 -22
6310
35,000
S
PCC
1/1/1942
2
3
Runway 4 -22
RW 4 -22
6325
35,000
S
PCC
1/1/1942
2
3
Runway 4 -22
RW 4 -22
6330
15,000
S
PCC
1/1/1942
1
1
Runway 9 -27
RW 9 -27
6205
15,000
S
PCC
1/1/1942
1
3
Runway 9 -27
RW 9 -27
6210
7,500
S
PCC
1/1/1942
1
1
Runway 9 -27
RW 9 -27
6215
420,500
S
AC
1/1/1942
17
105
Runway 9 -27
RW 9 -27
6220
210,250
S
AC
1/1/1942
8
53
Runway 9 -27
RW 9 -27
6225
30,000
S
PCC
1/1/1942
2
6
Runway 9 -27
RW 9 -27
6230
15,000
S
PCC
1/1/1942
1
3
Taxiway Alpha
TW A
205
277,550
P
AC
1/1/1942
6
69
Taxiway Alpha 1
TW A
210
23,450
P
AC
1/1/1942
1
6
Taxiway Alpha 2
TW A
220
23,450
P
AC
1/1/1942
1
6
Taxiway Bravo
TW B
105
117,050
P
AC
1/1/1942
4
29
Taxiway Bravo
TW B
110
132,650
P
AC
1/1/1942
4
33
Taxiway Bravo
TW B
115
10,000
P
AC
1/1/1942
1
3
Taxiway Bravo 1
TW B1
405
33,000
P
AC
1/1/1942
2
4
Taxiwa Bravo 1
TW B1
410
69,493
P
AC
1/1/1942
1
1
Taxiway Charlie
TW C
310
56,000
S
AC
1/1/1998
2
14
13
Packet Page -1200-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Air port
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 2 -3: Branch and Section Inventory (Continued)
Note: If a new construction, then survey date = last construction date and PCI is set to 100 by MicroPAVER.
Sections not surveyed due to reasons such as re- sectioning, no escort, not accessible at the time of survey. Section 4310 was not inspected
due to obstruction.
14
Packet Page -1201-
Section
True
Section
Surface
Last
Total
Total
Branch Name
Branch ID
ID
Area (fe)
Rank
Type
Const.
Samples
Samples
Date
Inspected
Taxiway Charlie
TW C
315
49,875
S
AC
1/1/2007
3
18
Taxiway to Crop Aron
TW TO AP
305
31,500
T
AC
1/1/1987
2
g
Note: If a new construction, then survey date = last construction date and PCI is set to 100 by MicroPAVER.
Sections not surveyed due to reasons such as re- sectioning, no escort, not accessible at the time of survey. Section 4310 was not inspected
due to obstruction.
14
Packet Page -1201-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
3. PAVEMENT CONDITION
Pavement conditions were inspected in accordance with the methods outlined in FAA AC
150/5380 -613 and ASTM D 5340 -04 "Standard Practice for Airport Pavement Condition Index
Surveys." These procedures define distress type, severity and quantity for sampling areas within
each section to determine the Pavement Condition Index (PCI).
3.1 Inspection Methodology
A PCI survey is performed by measuring the amount and severity of pavement distresses, which
are caused by traffic load, climate, and other factors, observed within a sample unit. This data is
imported into MicroPAVER, which calculates PCI values for the pavement sections. Tables 3 -1
and 3 -2 below list the pavement distress types and related causes for asphalt concrete (AC) and
Portland Cement Concrete (PCC), respectively.
Table 3 -1: Pavement Distresses for Asphalt Concrete Surfaces
Code
Distress
Mechanism
41
Alligator Cracking
Load
42
Bleeding
Construction Quality / Mix Design
43
Block Cracking
Climate / Age
44
Corrugation
Load / Construction Quality
45
Depression
Sub grade Quality
46
Jet Blast
Aircraft
47
Joint Reflection - Cracking
Climate / Prior Pavement
48
Longitudinal/Transverse Cracking
Climate / Age
49
Oil Spillage
Aircraft / Vehicle
50
Patching
Utility / Pavement Repair
51
Polished Aggregate
Load
52
Weathering/Raveling
Climate / Load
53
Rutting
Load
54
Shoving
Pavement Growth
55
Slippa e Cracking
Load / Pavement Bond
56
Swelling
Climate / Sub grade Quality
Source: U.S. Army CERL, FDOT Airf eld Inspection Reference Manual
15
Packet Page -1202-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 3 -2: Pavement Distresses for Portland Cement Concrete Surfaces
Code
Distress
Mechanism
61
Blow-up
Climate
62
Corner Break
Load
63
Linear Cracking
Load
64
Durability Cracking
Climate
65
Joint Seal Damage
Climate
66
Small Patch
Pavement Repair
67
Large Patch/Utility Cut
Utility / Pavement Repair
68
Po out
Climate
69
Pumping
Load
70
Scaling/Crazing Scaling/Crazing
Construction Quality
71
Faulting
Sub grade Quality
72
Shattered Slab
Load
73
Shrinkage Cracking
Construction Quality / Load
74
Joint Spalling
Load
75
Corner Spalling
Load
Source: U.S. Army CERL, FDOTAield Ins ection Reference Manual
Prior to conducting the inspections, Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates were recorded
using CADD at the centroid of each sample unit. The centroid is usually the geometric center of
the area, but in cases where sample units are irregular in shape, this is the center of mass. These
data are presented in a table on the updated Network Definition Map in Appendix A of this
report.
Pavement condition inspections at Immokalee Regional Airport were performed in March 2011.
Data were recorded in the field in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 150/5380 -613
"Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements" and ASTM D 5340
"Standard Test Method for Airport Pavement Condition Index Surveys" (2004).
After the completion of data collection, the data was imported into MicroPAVER, and PCI
values were calculated for the pavement sections.
3.2 Pavement Condition Index Results
According to the 2011 survey, the overall area - weighted PCI at Immokalee Regional Airport is
36, representing a Very Poor overall network condition.
Overall the airport exhibited pavement distresses associated with climate and age distresses.
Asphalt Concrete pavement distresses include; weathering, raveling, longitudinal and transverse
cracking, and block cracking distresses of which are common of pavements of similar age. The
Portland Cement Concrete pavement also exhibited distresses associated with climate and age
such as; corner breaks, LTD cracking, joint seal damage, scaling /map cracking, shrinkage cracks,
joint and corner spalling.
16
Packet Page -1203-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
The Asphalt Concrete pavement on RW 9 -27 exhibited low and medium severity block cracking
along with medium severity weathering and raveling. Portland Cement Concrete pavement
distresses were very similar throughout the airport and consisted of; corner breaks, LTD
cracking, joint seal damage, scaling /map cracking, shrinkage cracks, joint and corner spalling.
All of these distresses were typically of low to medium severity.
RW 18 -36 exhibited low and medium severity block cracking along with medium severity
weathering and raveling. Low and medium severity longitudinal and transverse cracking was
also observed throughout the runway pavement section.
Taxiways Alpha and Bravo exhibited very similar distresses to the runways, with low and
medium severity longitudinal and transverse cracking in addition to medium severity weathering
and raveling. Block cracking with low and medium severity was also a very prevalent distress
throughout the two main taxiways. Taxiway Charlie was recently reconstructed in 2006 and
appeared to be in a good overall condition. Small amounts of low severity longitudinal cracking
were observed along the pavement joints which is a common distress due to the pavement being
the weakest at this location.
A large portion of the apron pavement was recently reconstructed in 2006 and was not inspected
due to its new condition. The recently constructed pavement section was assumed to have a PCI
of 100. The remaining older pavement sections of the apron exhibited low severity longitudinal
and transverse cracking with low severity weathering and raveling.
Appendix B contains a table and a Condition Map which depicts the PCI results by Section, and
Appendix C contains a table of PCI results by Branch. Appendix I includes detailed distress data
generated by MicroPAVER for each inspected sample unit.
Figure 3 -1 provides the PCI distribution by rating category for Immokalee Regional Airport.
17
Packet Page -1204-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Figure 3 -1: Network PCI Distribution by Rating Category
Good 10% Failed 1%
Sat-_r__�___. _
Fai
-T -....- ._,..
Figure 3 -1a: Condition Rating Summary
Condition Rating
Total Area
(ft')
Percent
Good
253,084
10%
Satisfactory
90,370
3%
Fair
31,500
1%
Poor
0
0%
Very Poor
1,857,643
72%
Serious
346,000
13%
Failed
15,000
1%
Approximately 13% of the network is in Good and Satisfactory condition while 14% of the
network is in Serious and Failed condition. Table 3 -3 illustrates the area - weighted PCI
computed individually for each pavement use.
18
Packet Page -1205-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 3 -3: Condition by Pavement Use
Use
Area - Weighted PCI
Condition Rating
Runway
28
Very Poor
Taxiway
37
Very Poor
Apron
86
Good
All (Weighted)
36
Very Poor
Figure 3 -2 presents the breakdown of PCI by range for each pavement use.
Figure 3 -2: Percentage of Pavement Area within Each
PCI Range by Pavement Use
(a) Runway
® Good: 86 -100 E Satisfactory: 71 -85 D Fair: 56 -70 E Poor: 41 -55
D Very Poor: 26 -40 ® Serious: 11 -25 o Failed: 0 -10
19
Packet Page -1206-
Pavement Evaluation Report Immolalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
100%
90%
80%
70%
y 60%
U
p� 50%
ra
d 40%
a
30%
20%
10%
0%
(b) Taxiway
47%
37%
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
0% 0% 0%
Pavement Condition Rating
■ Good: 86 -100 E7 Satisfactory: 71 -85 J Fair: 56 -70 E Poor: 41 -55
]Very Poor: 26 -40 ■ Serious: 11 -25 ❑ Failed: 0 -10
20
Packet Page -1207-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
(c) Apron
® Good: 86 -100 ] Satisfactory: 71 -85 : Fair: 56 -70 E Poor: 41 -55
Wery Poor: 26 -40 ■ Serious: 11 -25 o Failed: 0 -10
21
Packet Page -1208-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report - Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
4. PAVEMENT CONDITION PREDICTION
Performance prediction models or deterioration curves for PCI were used to develop a condition
forecast. The performance models were developed for combinations of variables such as
pavement use (runway, taxiway or apron), surface type (AC or PCC) and airport category (GA,
RL, or PR). Figure 4 -1 illustrates the predicted performance of pavements at Immokalee
Regional Airport based on current condition, age since last construction and the deterioration
model appropriate for the type of pavement. The figure presents the forecast for each pavement
use and displays the FDOT minimum service level for General Aviation (GA) airports.
Figure 4 -1: Predicted PCI by Pavement Use
Appendix D presents the tabular summary of the predicted Section PCI for each year from 2011
to 2020.
22
Packet Page -1209-
100
90
73 72
70
— 69
67
80
64 63
62
48
44 43
41
39
37
a�
bD
70
34
32
29
�7
` 23
21
Runways
60
19
/7
54
14
12
Taxiways
50
3
Apron
L
40
FDOT Minimum Service Level
d
— - 75 Runways
'"
30
U
-- - 65 Taxiways
20
— - 60 Aprons
10
0
2010
2011 2012 2013 2014
2015
2016
2017
2018 2019
2020
2021
Year
Appendix D presents the tabular summary of the predicted Section PCI for each year from 2011
to 2020.
22
Packet Page -1209-
73 72
70
— 69
67
64 63
62
48
44 43
41
39
37
34
32
29
�7
` 23
21
19
/7
14
12
Appendix D presents the tabular summary of the predicted Section PCI for each year from 2011
to 2020.
22
Packet Page -1209-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Air port
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
5. MAINTENANCE POLICIES AND COSTS
5.1 Policies
Maintenance and rehabilitation (M &R) policies are sets of rules used to develop repair
recommendations for distresses encountered during the visual inspections.
Maintenance refers to repair -type activities that are applied to specific distress types on the
pavement. These activities are preventative and /or corrective in nature and are recommended to
help achieve the performance goal.
Table 5 -1 provides the list of the maintenance activities used in MicroPAVER to treat specific
distress types. MicroPAVER applies repairs to these distresses and adjusts the PCI based on
specific rules. These repairs are used only in the first year of an analysis.
Rehabilitation is warranted when the pavement condition decreases below a critical point such
that the deterioration is extensive or the rate of deterioration is so great that routine maintenance
is no longer cost - efficient. This critical point is called "Critical PCI." The critical PCI levels for
different pavement and branch types established in the previous SAPMP update were used in this
update for the development of the M &R plan for the airport. Sections above critical PCI levels
receive routine maintenances while pavements predicted to deteriorate below their respective
critical PCI level during the analysis period will be identified for Major M &R. Table 5 -2 gives
the critical PCI levels for General Aviation Airports.
The maintenance rehabilitation policy and activity costs have been updated based on the study of
readily available construction cost data at the time of this study. The costs depicted in this report
are intended for planning purposes.
23
Packet Page -1210-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Ow
Table 5 -1: Routine Maintenance Activities for Airfield Pavements {
Surface
Distress
Sever! *
Work Type
Code
Work Unit
Alligator Crack
M, H
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Bleeding
N/A
No Localized M &R
NONE
N/A
Block Crack
M, H
Crack Sealing — AC
CS -AC
S Ft
Corrugation
L, M, H
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Depression
M, H
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Jet Blast
N/A
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Joint Ref. Crack
M, H
Crack Sealing — AC
CS -AC
Ft
L & T Crack
M, H
Crack Sealing — AC
CS -AC
Ft
AC
Oil Spillage
N/A
Patching - AC Shallow
PA -AS
S Ft
Patching
M, H
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Polished Agg.
N/A
No Localized M &R
NONE
N/A
Raveling and
Weathering
L
Surface Sealing - Rejuvenating
SS -RE
S Ft
M
Surface Seal - Coal Tar
SS -CT
S Ft
H
Microsurfacin
MI -AC
S Ft
Rutting
M, H
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Shoving
M, H
Grinding Localized
GR -LL
S Ft
Slippage Crack
N/A
Patching - AC Shallow
PA -AS
S Ft
Swelling
M, H
Patching - AC Dee
PA -AD
S Ft
Blow-Up
L, M, H
Patching PCC Full Depth
PA -PF
S Ft
Corner Break
M, H
Patching - PCC Full Depth
PA -PF
S Ft
Linear Crack
M, H
Crack Sealing — PCC
CS -PC
Ft
Durability Crack
H
Slab Replacement — PCC
SL -PC
S Ft
M
Patching - PCC Full Depth
PA -PF
S Ft
Jt. Seal Damage
M, H
Joint Seal Localized
JS -LC
Ft
Small Patch
M, H
Patching - PCC Partial Depth
PA -PP
S Ft
PCC
Large Patch
M, H
Patching - PCC Full Depth
PA -PF
S Ft
Po outs
N/A
No Localized M &R
NONE
N/A
Pumping
N/A
No Localized M &R
NONE
N/A
Scaling
H
Slab Replacement — PCC
SL -PC
S Ft
Faulting
M, H
Grinding Localized
GR -PP
Ft
Shattered Slab
M, H
Slab Replacement — PCC
SL -PC
S Ft
Shrinkage Crack
N/A
No Localized M &R
NONE
N/A
Joint S all
M, H
Patching - PCC Partial Depth
PA -PP
SgFt
Corner S all
M, H
Patching - PCC Partial Depth
PA -PP
S Ft
*L = Low, M = Medium, H = High
24
Packet Page -1211-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 5 -2: Critical PCI for General Aviation Airports
Use
Critical PCI
Runway
65
Taxiway
65
Apron
65
It should be noted that critical PCI is not the same as Minimum PCI or Minimum Condition.
The Minimum PCI is a value set by the user so pavement sections are rehabilitated before they
fall below the set minimum. Table 5 -3 gives the targeted, or desired, Minimum PCI values for
runways, taxiways, and aprons of General Aviation Airports.
Table 5 -3: FDOT Minimum Service Level PCI for General Aviation Airports
Minimum PCI
Runway
Taxiway
Apron
75
65
60
Typical Major M &R activities range from overlays to reconstruction. Based on the critical PCI
values in Table 5 -2 the PCI trigger range when the likely activity would be a mill and resurface
was 40 to 79 and reconstruction at a PCI of 39 or lower. One important concept of pavement
management systems is that it is cost effective to maintain pavements that are already in good
condition rather than wait for them to get worse and require more expensive rehabilitation.
Crack sealing and full -depth patching are the M &R activities recommended to repair pavements
with PCI values between 80 and 90. MicroPAVER considers these as preventative M &R with
their primary objective being to slow the rate of pavement deterioration. While the trigger PCI
for mill and overlay has been set to 55, MicroPAVER also assigns mill and overlay to sections
with a PCI greater than 55 if they exhibit some structural distress. Table 5 -4 summarizes the
M &R activities for General Aviation Airports based on PCI value.
25
Packet Page -1212-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immobalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 5 -4: M &R Activities for General Aviation Airports
5.2 Unit Costs
FDOT cost databases for airports and highway pavement maintenance and rehabilitation were
updated from the previous SAPMP study based on current construction cost trends in order to
determine meaningful costs for the program. Table 5 -5 presents the unit costs summary.
5.3 M &R Activities
FDOT recognizes that although Mill and Overlay work is recommended for asphalt pavements
within a PCI range from 40 to 79, it is conceivable that airports may not have adequate funding
to perform this type of rehabilitation. Microsurfacing treatment is a maintenance /rehabilitation
measure that can be used in lieu of asphalt pavement mill and overlay; however it should be
understood that this measure is intended for short term pavement life extension. While the cost of low
microsurfacing is significantly lower than that of pavement mill and overlay, it is not intended to
be a full rehabilitative measure for long term benefit.
26
Packet Page -1213-
Activity
PCI Range
Maintenance
Crack Sealing and Full -Depth Patching
80 and 90
Rehabilitation
Mill and Overlay (AC) or
Concrete Pavement Restoration (PCC)
40 to 79
Reconstruction
39 and less
5.2 Unit Costs
FDOT cost databases for airports and highway pavement maintenance and rehabilitation were
updated from the previous SAPMP study based on current construction cost trends in order to
determine meaningful costs for the program. Table 5 -5 presents the unit costs summary.
5.3 M &R Activities
FDOT recognizes that although Mill and Overlay work is recommended for asphalt pavements
within a PCI range from 40 to 79, it is conceivable that airports may not have adequate funding
to perform this type of rehabilitation. Microsurfacing treatment is a maintenance /rehabilitation
measure that can be used in lieu of asphalt pavement mill and overlay; however it should be
understood that this measure is intended for short term pavement life extension. While the cost of low
microsurfacing is significantly lower than that of pavement mill and overlay, it is not intended to
be a full rehabilitative measure for long term benefit.
26
Packet Page -1213-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 5 -5: Maintenance Unit Costs for FDOT
Code
Name
Cost
Unit
GR -LL
Grinding (Localized for AC)
$2.10
SgFt
PA -AL
Patching — AC Leveling
$2.30
SgFt
PA -AS
Patching — AC Shallow
$2.90
SgFt
PA -PF
Patching — PCC Full Depth
$38.11
SgFt
PA -PP
Patching — PCC Partial Depth
$19.06
SgFt
SL -PC
Slab Replacement — PCC
$39.11
SgFt
CS -PC
Crack Sealing — PCC
$4.24
Ft
UN -PC
Undersealing — PCC
$3.40
Ft
CS -AC
Crack Sealing — AC
$2.25
Ft
GR -PP
Grinding (Localized for PCC)
$22.51
Ft
JS -LC
Joint Seal (Localized)
$2.00
Ft
SH -LE
Shoulder Leveling
$2.81
Ft
JS -SI
Joint Seal — Silicon
$2.81
Ft
PA -AD
Patching — AC Deep
$4.90
SgFt
OL -AT
Overlay — AC Thin
$2.80
SgFt
SS -CT
Surface Seal — Coal Tar
$0.40
SgFt
SS -FS
Surface Seal — Fog Seal
$0.40
SgFt
SS -RE
Surface Seal — Rejuvenating
$0.40
SgFt
ST -SB
Surface Treatment — Single Bitum.
$0.30
SgFt
ST -SS
Surface Treatment— Slurry Seal
$0.55
SgFt
ST -ST
Surface Treatment — Sand Tar
$0.28
SgFt
MI -AC
Microsurfacing - AC
$0.65
SgFt
The improvement in condition due to maintenance actions applied to specific distresses is only
performed when an inspection was performed recently and only in the first year of the M &R
analysis. In subsequent years, MicroPAVER calculates M &R costs based on expected unit costs
for pavements in a range of PCIs. That is, for low PCI, it is expected that the repair would be
significant (e.g. reconstruction) and therefore very costly.
Using available unit cost data, the Major M &R Cost by Condition table was set up as shown in
Table 5 -6. The cost assigned to each range of PCI is based on a Transportation Cost Report
provided by Office of Planning Policy of FDOT where the unit costs of reconstruction and
resurfacing of airfield pavements were included. These costs were then assigned to the
appropriate PCI range to arrive at a cost per square foot necessary to restore pavements at that
PCI level to new condition, i.e. a PCI of 100.
27
Packet Page -1214-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table 5 -6: M &R Activities and Unit Costs by Condition for
General Aviation Airports
A 3% inflation rate per year was applied to the unit costs during the M &R analysis.
28
Packet Page -1215-
Activity
PCI Trigger
Cost /SgFt
Maintenance
Crack Sealing and Full -Depth Patching
90
$0.06
s0
$0.24
Rehabilitation
Mill and Overlay (AC) or
Concrete Pavement Restoration (PCC)
70
$3.00
60
$3.42
50
$6.29
40
$6.29
Reconstruction
30
$13.62
20
$13.62
A 3% inflation rate per year was applied to the unit costs during the M &R analysis.
28
Packet Page -1215-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Ai7port
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
6. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION NEEDS ANALYSIS
Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M &R) analyses were performed after the condition data were
calculated and MicroPAVER was customized with the maintenance policies and cost settings
described in the previous section.
The objective of the M &R analysis is to observe the effect of different fiscal scenarios on the
network condition, over a period of ten years, starting from 2011. The analysis was conducted
using an unlimited budget. An unlimited budget allows all M &R needs to be identified along
with the associated cost regardless of priority.
Table 6 -1 presents the M &R list of immediate needs for Major M &R, i.e. Year 1 of the forecast.
The importance of this listing is that it points out the major activities triggered by the current
condition of the pavements.
r•e
Packet Page -1216-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
AMW
Table 6 -1: Summary of Immediate Major M &R Needs �'V
Project
Year
Branch Name
Section
ID
Surface
Type
Section
Area
(ft)
Major M &R
Costs*
PCI
Before
M &R
M &R Activity
PCI
After
M &R
2011
Crop Apron
4105
AC
10,000
$70,230.01
39
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 18 -36
6105
PCC
30,000
$408,600.13
27
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 18 -36
6110
PCC
15,000
$204,300.07
30
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 18 -36
6115
AC
422,500
$5,754,451.87
28
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 18 -36
6120
AC
211,250
$2,877,225.93
29
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 18 -36
6125
PCC
30,000
$408,600.13
17
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 18 -36
6130
PCC
15,000
$204,300.07
23
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 4 -22
6305
PCC
15,000
$138,330.04
36
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 4 -22
6310
PCC
35,000
$348,425.09
35
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 4 -22
6325
PCC
35,000
$476,700.15
30
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 4 -22
6330
PCC
15,000
$171,315.06
33
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 9 -27
6205
PCC
15,000
$204,300.07
28
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 9 -27
6210
PCC
7,500
$102,150.03
25
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 9 -27
6215
AC
420,500
$5,727,211.86
28
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 9 -27
6220
AC
210,250
$2,863,605.93
28
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 9 -27
6225
PCC
30,000
$408,600.13
26
Reconstruction
100
2011
Runway 9 -27
6230
PCC
15,000
$204,300.07
4
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Alpha
205
AC
277,550
$3,780,232.23
25
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Alpha 1
210
AC
23,450
$319,389.10
26
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Alpha 2
220
AC
23,450
$319,389.10
22
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Bravo
105
AC
117,050
$1,594,221.52
26
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Bravo
110
AC
132,650
$1,417,763.62
34
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Bravo
115
AC
10,000
$114,210.04
33
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Bravo 1
405
AC
33,000
$352,704.10
34
Reconstruction
100
2011
Taxiway Bravo 1
410
AC
69,493
$946,494.97
28
Reconstruction
100
Total
$29,417,051.32
28
100
* Costs are adjusted for inflation.
In addition to the immediate Major M &R needs, maintenance activities for pavement areas
above critical PCI have been recommended by MicroPAVER for Year l and are shown in Table
6 -2 below. The costs provided in Table 5 -5 were used to calculate the costs associated with this
work, which is intended to treat specific distress types. A more detailed table is provided in
Appendix E.
30
Packet Page -1217-
0
O
d
�i
N
w
O
d
O
W
O
L
R
�o
0
y
o
J.d
v
d
V
C
it
r.r
C
z.
CQ
Cwr
0
t^r
N
Ri
r
M
W
N
4
N
O
N
(D
3
d)
(�
L
E.2
M
69
69
69
I:oq
3
✓ ✓++
b4
69
69
69
69
Y
O
O
O
O
O
O
�
O
O
O
O
�
II
�
V
6ORJ-
G's
6os
io9
E's
Y
y
—
—
Y
a-+
—
w
—
Y
—
w
[z.
w
Cc
W
w
.,
w
w
w
W
«,
k"
w
Ln
rn
Ln
V)
Ln
rn
cn
cn
0
0
o
�
0
0
00
3
M
'It
N
0
0,
N
N
N
bb
to
bA
bb
w
C
C
C
cC
G
cd
cC
p
cC
U
cC
52
cc
cC
U
r
d
¢
Cx
C4
CG
N
s
N
N
L
N
N
N
u
i
3
L
un
a�
�•
y
Q �
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
•p
_
g
d
¢
L =
f�
C4
CD
w A
O
o
0
0
0
0
1.1
t
7
7
M
M
M
M
It
't
cn
O
\J
VJ
�O
U
U
¢
¢
¢
3
0
0
cl
a
L
c
�
E
C4
n�
94
w
W
to
bn
C
C
c
c
C
z
M
M
M
M
7
a
C.
a:
C
cl
W
mw
iS.
iL
a,
Z
M
M
U
U
sC6.
??
a❑
c
s
0.1
Z
U
U
o
0
°
0
C4
C4
C4
3
nL
c,
¢
n
d
a
¢
cc
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
3
3
3
n
¢
d
¢
¢
¢
Ln
v°)
un
r
M
W
N
4
N
O
N
(D
3
d)
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report Immokalee Regional Air port
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
The 10 year forecast results are shown in Figure 6 -1, illustrating the effect on pavement
condition (PCI) of doing no maintenance versus having unlimited funds and performing all
M &R actions based on the policies.
Figure 6 -1: Budget Scenario Analysis
100
90
80
�a
z.
70
d
60
s
50
3 —No M &R
40
L —>e M &R
d 30 -
U
o, 20
10
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Year
The following network level observations can be made from the figure above:
• The PCI will deteriorate from 36 in 2011 to 21 in ten years if no M &R activities are
performed.
• The PCI will remain at or above 84 through the 10 -year analysis period under the
unlimited budget scenario. A 2020 PCI of 84 with this scenario is 63 PCI points
higher than a "No M &R" scenario. The total cost for Major M &R over this 10 -year
period is about $29.7 million.
32
Packet Page -1219-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
7. MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PLAN
The M &R analysis results include activities that likely exceed a typical annual budget level.
These activities would need to be evaluated for feasibility and desirability based on the airport's
future plans. In an effort to identify appropriate budget levels, the 10 year M &R analysis was
evaluated to determine levels needed to address several specific areas: preventive maintenance,
major activities for pavements in poor condition (Major M &R for PCIs less than Critical), and
activities that would be desirable to preserve good pavement conditions where they exist (Major
M &R for PCI greater than or equal to Critical).
Table 7 -1 provides the summary results under the critical PCI unlimited funding scenario.
Table 7 -1: M &R Costs under Unlimited Funding Scenario
Year
Preventative
Major M &R
Total Year Cost
2011
$20,957.69
$29,417,051.31
$29,438,009.00
2012
$29,447.90
$0.00
$29,447.90
2013
$26,966.46
$86,921.18
$113,887.64
2014
$35,170.20
$0.00
$35,170.20
2015
$42,660.34
$0.00
$42,660.34
2016
$43,064.93
$171,691.73
$214,756.66
2017
$56,853.78
$0.00
$56,853.78
2018
$89,850.10
$0.00
$89,850.10
2019
$153,829.30
$0.00
$153,829.30
2020
$195,910.68
$0.00
$195,910.68
Total
$694,711.38
1 $29,675,664.22
$30,370,375.60
Note: Costs are adjusted for inflation.
Approximately 99% of the total Major M &R cost is required in the first year (2011). According
to the 2011 inspections, the following pavement sections were in immediate need of Major M &R
Activity:
■ Crop Apron — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Runway 18 -36 — Reconstruction of PCC pavement per the FAA P -501 Specification
and Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401 Specification.
• Runway 4 -22 — Reconstruction of PCC pavement per the FAA P -501 Specification.
• Runway 9 -27 — Reconstruction of PCC pavement per the FAA P -501 Specification
and Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401 Specification.
■ Taxiway Alpha — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
33
Packet Page -1220-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
• Taxiway Alpha 1 — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Taxiway Alpha 2 — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Taxiway Bravo — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Taxiway Bravo 1 — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
The unlimited budget scenario provides the basis for estimating the total repair cost.
Appendix F provides details of M &R plan by year under the unlimited funding scenario, and the
map of the 10 -year M &R plan is provided in Appendix G. It is important to understand that the
SAPMP is a network level tool and the M &R costs provided in this report are only for planning
purposes.
34
Packet Page -1221-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
8. VISUAL AIDS
8.1 System Inventory and Network Definition Drawings
The System Inventory and Network Definition CADD drawings, which show the airport
pavement outline with Branch and Section boundaries and identify changes in the network
pavement since the last inspection and the sampling plan, respectively, are included in Appendix
A of this report.
8.2 Condition Map
A Condition Map that has been prepared based on data linked to the airport's shape file is
included in Appendix B. The Condition Map graphically show the inventory and condition of the
airport via color coding shown on the shape file. The coding provides a visual representation
that illustrates the PCIs for each pavement section.
8.3 10 -Year M &R Map
A 10 -Year M &R Map that shows the summary of the M &R plan is attached in Appendix G.
8.4 Photographs
Selected digital photographs taken during the pavement inspection are provided in Appendix H
to provide visual support to special pavement conditions or distress observed during the
inspection of the airport.
35
Packet Page -1222-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
9. RECOMMENDATIONS
Pavement condition inspections were performed at Immokalee Regional Airport, and a 10 -year
M &R plan was developed based on the unlimited funding scenario.
The following recommendations were made based on the 2011 condition inspection and M &R
analysis results:
■ Crop Apron — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
■ Runway 18 -36 — Reconstruction of PCC pavement per the FAA P -501 Specification
and Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401 Specification.
• Runway 4 -22 — Reconstruction of PCC pavement per the FAA P -501 Specification.
• Runway 9 -27 — Reconstruction of PCC pavement per the FAA P -501 Specification
and Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401 Specification.
• Taxiway Alpha — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Taxiway Alpha 1 — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Taxiway Alpha 2 — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
• Taxiway Bravo — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
■ Taxiway Bravo 1 — Asphalt Pavement reconstruction activity per the FAA P -401
Specification.
Further evaluation of these features is necessary in order to develop repair plans and timing for
future budgets since these needs cannot be addressed with typical annual expenditures.
36
Packet Page -1223-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
APPENDIX A
NETWORK DEFINITION MAP
SYSTEM INVENTORY MAP
PAVEMENT INVENTORY TABLE
WORK HISTORY REPORT
Packet Page -1224-
dC
W U
W ��
Fs os <. QO
U
°s z Z Ep
5 W
J s W'P
Sb :Z;� 4 05� ago
Lif
00�
Ra
a�
i
o ➢�
\W�
w. N
olloollooll Iloilo -11 lmillooloolloil
MINES IN i 11111
a
m
a
a
4
I
—F
10
OW
ILO
<
ai
___ .
\�
,0|
Z
2!0
Vz
0
u
q30 z
O5
)Lois
(%
A
z <
j
o-1
Ei
)
I
O
o
'04 0
N �
o�
W �
'G N
L
ICI
�r
it
�i
r�
Rf
L�
4n
a�
kr)
v'1
(�
N
'V
M
O
kr�
\O
M
M
M
M
O
M
FC
�
R
—
—
.-r
—
—
—
—
.-r
—
—
—
.-..
.--i
—
.--i
—
—
—
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
a � A
o0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
07
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
00
00
N
00
l�
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O�
O
O
C�
O,
O
00
7
7
7
7
It
C'
'7
7
rn C .r
N
N
N
p a
N
CJ CD
4 =
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
<
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
a
a
d
d
a
a
d
d
F
0...
nom.
M.
0U.,
a.
0..
o
�
as
a
s
M.
z
a
a
a
a
a
a
c..
a
a
a
aV�
Cn
U�
cn
C-1
CIO
V�
V�
p
O
N
O
o0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
�
i i C
kr?
O
M
N
00
00
M
Ct
O
O
vi
N
N
vi
kf
V'�
-
R
k
O
O
N
N
to
W1
M
M
-�
r
N
M
M
M
N
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
00
O
M
M
Vr
M
110
Vr
M
M
10
M
n�
o0
C
O
v1
v1
O
v
N
O
kn
O
V%
V)
O
O
kn
O
O
kn
O
V)
O
Ln
O
yO
Q
O
--
--
O
^-
--
N
O
O
-•
-•
N_
N
O
^
N
M
O
—�
^•
N
N
N
_M
G
G
O
d
Q
Q¢¢
d
d
Q
0
0
C
0
0
C
0
0
0¢¢¢¢
'z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
w
wQ�
w
w
C
Q.,
C4
ce.
Q�
24
w
a
`3
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
[—
l—
1--
r-
U
z
Q
01.
�
�
�
�
L
¢
=
r
00
00
00
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
a
a
a
—
—
—
—
—
�xxc4S
�Qw
L
M
C.
C".
C6
CL
cC
cC
cC
Rt
V
v
R
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
�
t`
�
L+
=
O
O
O
O
=
07
00
00
00
00
0p
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
CL
cm
LL
Q
w
N
4
N
O
W,
r--r
CWW
/T
Y J
w
y
O
d r
d
O pp
�r
w�
o ;
m
v �
o q�,
Q z
W�
0
^C
D
C
C
0
U
0
C
C
C
r
al
1
N
Q
co
N
4
N
O
N
fD
a�
R
CQ
Rt CC
N
00
N
cc
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
00
N
00
� n A
o0
00
00
07
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
00
1-
1-
++
00
4? c
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
¢¢
d
d
d¢¢¢¢
d¢
o f
0.
n �
0
R
cn
ca
0.
a.a
0.
D,
0.
w
w
CA
V)
H
�
N
kn
'IT
M
p w
c
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
vl
3 �
N
V'�
V'1
Vl
V7
V'1
�
V'1
V't
M
M
M
M
N
n
V Q
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
w
N
N
N
L ►7
2z''
X
iC
p
x
r
0.
N
U
�
�
o
:Q
L
CL
113
U
d
d
d
Cq
W
W
CA
W
U
U
°
cz
c�
c
c
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
cz
c
E�
E�
E�
E■
H
F-
E�
H
E,
H
F-
N
Q
co
N
4
N
O
N
fD
nin -7 innwn u___ w
Date:05/17/2011
Work History Report
014- / /GV I G 1lCl
1 of 6
Work
Code
Pavement Database:
Cost
Network: IMM
Branch: AP HANG (APRON TO HANGARS)
Section: 4405 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1998 Use:
APRON Rank:P Length: 900.00 Ft Width:
25.00 Ft True Area: 22.500.00 SaF
. Work .
Date" `„
Work
Code
M&R
Work
Description
Cost
hi ckness
( iin) , '
Major
Mg,R
'
Comments
01/01/1998 =
IMPORTED
Network: IMM Branch: AP S (SOUTH APRON AND FUELING RAMPS) Section: 4220 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 07/31/2007 Use: APRON Rank:P Length: 180.00 Ft Width: 200.00 Ft True Area: 36.000.00 SaF
BUILT. ,,*
L.C.D.: 01/01/2001 Use: APRON Rank:P Length: 80.00 Ft Width: 66.00 Ft True Area: 6.309.00 SaF
Work-
Work
True
998 ACPAVEMENT. ,.1, ,. , x„
Major"
M&R
6L
Major
Network: IMM Branch: AP RU RW36 (APRON RUN -UP RW 36) Section: 4305 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1998 Use: APRON Rank:P Length: 150.00 Ft Width: 50.00 Ft True Area: 8.000.00 SaF
Work ,`
Date
Work
Code
Work
Description;
Cost
hilliness
:,
Major
Comments r
Work
Code
Work -
Description
Cost
ickness
(in)
(In)
M&R
f ¢ f 3^
01/01/1998.;
IMPORTED
$01
0:0
True`
True
Network: IMM Branch: AP S (SOUTH APRON AND FUELING RAMPS) Section: 4220 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 07/31/2007 Use: APRON Rank:P Length: 180.00 Ft Width: 200.00 Ft True Area: 36.000.00 SaF
Network: IMM Branch: AP RU RW36 (APRON RUN -UP RN 36) Section: 4310 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2001 Use: APRON Rank:P Length: 80.00 Ft Width: 66.00 Ft True Area: 6.309.00 SaF
Work-
Work
Work
Work
Major"
M&R
6L
Major
: r
Data,,,-,
Code
Descrlptiorr
Cost
(��) -.
M&R
Comments
Work
Code
o., Work
Description
Cost
Thickness
in
( )
Major
M&R
Comments
01/01/1987 `
01/01/2001
NC -AC
New Construction -AC
$0
0.0
True
Network: IMM Branch: AP RU RW36 (APRON RUN -UP RN 36) Section: 4315 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2002 Use: APRON Rank:N Length: 185.00 Ft Width: 86.00 Ft True Area: 18.752.00 SaF
. Work
Work
Work
Mai or
Date . :;; '
Code
"
Descriptlor
Cost
rhiclicnessl
(in) •�
M&R;r.,�;
Comments
.
01/01/2002
NC -AC
New Construction = AC
$0
0:0
True
:; ..
Network: IMM Branch: AP S (SOUTH APRON AND FUELING RAMPS) Section: 4205 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1997 Use: APRON Rank:P Length: 140.00 Ft Width: 200.00 Ft True Area: 28.000.00 SaF
Work; ,
Work
Work '
hidcness
Major
i Date �.° ,;''
Code
De scnption
Cost
( in) `°
M&R
Comments -. ,
u
01/01/1997`` "
IMPORTED
BUILT
- I
True
h6OAC PAVEMENT
Network: IMM Branch: AP S (SOUTH APRON AND FUELING RAMPS) Section: 4210 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1998 Use: APRON Rank:P Length: 216.00 Ft Width: 355.00 Ft True Area: 63.618.00 SaF
Work '•,
Work
Work - .
hickness
Major
Date.
Code
Description
Cost'.
On)_
M&R
.Comments
01/01/1998.'
IMPORTED
I BUILT w
-
I True
998ACPAVEMENT t: w
Network: IMM Branch: AP S (SOUTH APRON AND FUELING RAMPS) Section: 4215 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 07/31/2007 Use: APRON Rank:P Length: 340.00 Ft Width: 160.00 Ft True Area: 54.400.00 SaF
Work.
Date--:,,
Work
Code
Work -
Description
Cost
ickness
(in)
Major
M&R
Comments,
07/3112007 L L
INITIAL
Initial Construction `:
$01
0:0
True`
Network: IMM Branch: AP S (SOUTH APRON AND FUELING RAMPS) Section: 4220 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 07/31/2007 Use: APRON Rank:P Length: 180.00 Ft Width: 200.00 Ft True Area: 36.000.00 SaF
Work
Dated
Work
Code
Work
Description
Cost
�hickne s s
('in)
Major"
M&R
Comments
07/31/200T
INITIAL
Initial Construction
$01
0.0
True
Network: IMM Branch: AP SW (SOUTHWEST APRON) Section: 4105 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1987 Use: APRON Rank:P Length: 100.00 Ft Width: 100.00 Ft True Area: 10.000.00 SaF
Work
Date,
Work
Code
o., Work
Description
Cost
Thickness
in
( )
Major
M&R
Comments
01/01/1987 `
IMPORTED
BUILT
-
True
STIMATE'1987 AC PAVEMENT'
Packet Page -1229-
6.U.3.
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Date:05/17/2011 Work History Report 2 of 6 I
Pavement Database:
Network: IMM Branch: RW 18 -36 (RUNWAY 18 -36)
C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:P Length: 300.00 Ft
Work
Work
er Work,° 6,
j In) M
Date
Code
Descnptlonji
Cost
£
Description
TrueSTIMATE 1
1942 PCC
01/01/1942:
IMPORTED
BUILT
Major
Network: IMM Branch: RW 18 -36 (RUNWAY 18 -36)
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:P Length: 600.00 Ft
Work =
Work
W kl '
True S
STIMATE 192 PCC
Code
Description
Cost
01/01/1942
IMPORTED
BUILT",";
Network: IMM Branch: RW 18 -36 (RUNWAY 18 -36)
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:P Length: 4.225.00 Ft
Works
Work
�f
Wori�'�a ��
M&R,'
Date
Code
Descriptioetrl
Cost
�,'„
STIMATE =1942 PCC'
01/01/19427 -,`
IMPORTED
Work,
Work
IMPORTED
IMPORTED
Section: 6105 Surface: PCC
Width: 100.00 Ft True Area: 30.000.00 SaF
Idnese M
Major..
Work
j In) M
M&R C
Comments f k £
.°
Comments
Date ;
£
Description
TrueSTIMATE 1
1942 PCC
Section: 6110 Surface: PCC
Width: 25.00 Ft True Area: 15.000.00 SoF
ickness' M
Major
OVERt AY
( fn) M
M&R C
Comments
STIMATE 1942 AC PAVEMENT
True S
STIMATE 192 PCC
Section: 6115 Surface: AC
Width: 100.00 Ft True Area: 422.500.00 SaF
ickness M
Major'
PAVEMENT SECTION IS 2,, AC ON 8
Major
Comments r
2:001 True P PAVEMENT SECTION IS 2" AG ON I
True
True
Network: IMM Branch: RW 18 -36 (RUNWAY 18 -36) Section: 6120 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:P Length: 8.450.00 Ft Width: 25.00 Ft True Area: 211.250.00 SaF
Work';
Work
Work
Thickness
Major
.°
Comments
Date ;
Code
Description
Cost
(in),
M&R
:=
01/0111942,._
IMPORTED
OVERt AY
True
STIMATE 1942 AC PAVEMENT
01/01/1942:.
IMPORTED
BUILT,-'
2.00
True
PAVEMENT SECTION IS 2,, AC ON 8
Network: IMM Branch: RW 18 -36 (RUNWAY 18 -36) Section: 6125 Surface: PCC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:P Length: 300.00 Ft Width: 100.00 Ft True Area: 30.000.00 SoF
Work;
Work
Work
hickness
Major
Comments
Date,,;
Code
,, ,;: Description >,w
Cost„
(din)
M&Rr;
01/01/1942'
IMPORTED
BUILT • '.
True
STIMATE 3942 PCC
Network: IMM Branch: RW 18 -36 (RUNWAY 18 -36) Section: 6130 Surface: PCC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:P Length: 600.00 Ft Width: 25.00 Ft True Area: 15.000.00 SaF
Work
Work
�� Work -<
hfdcness
Major
Code,.
Description ...',..
Cost
(in)
M&R,'
Comments
01/01/1942 f
IMPORTED
BUILT
True
STIMATE =1942 PCC'
Network: IMM Branch: RW 4 -22 (RUNWAY 4-22) Section: 6305 Surface: PCC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:S Length: 600.00 Ft Width: 25.00 Ft True Area: 15.000.00 SaF
Work,
Work
Work,
hickness
Major
Date ';, -
Code
,;
Description
Cost
M&R
Comments
01/01/1942
IMPORTED
I True
kSTIMATE 1942 PCC -
Network: IMM Branch: RW 4 -22 (RUNWAY4 -22) Section: 6310 Surface: PCC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:S Length: 350.00 Ft Width: 100.00 Ft True Area: 35.000.00 SaF
Work
Work,
hfckness' '
Major
,
Date
Code
Description
Cost
in) = .
Mgt
,Comments
01/01/1942
IMPORTED
BUILT
True
STIMATE 1942 PCC
Packet Page -1230-
-
Work History Report
J!L / /LV I4 ILCIII I
Date:05/17/2011
a fa uWO `.
Work
3 of 6
Major
Pavement Database:
Date.';
Code
Network: IMM
Branch: RW 4 -22 (RUNWAY 4-22)
(,n)_
Section: 6325 Surface: PCC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use:
RUNWAY Rank:S Length: 350.00 Ft
Width:
100.00 Ft True Area: 35.000.00 SaF
Work < =
Work
2.00
Work F
01/01/1942 '
hidkness
Major
;
Date. ;;° :
Code;
STIMATE 1942 PCC. :-
Desch ion -
pt
Cost
in)
M8Jt
Comments .'
hickne99
Major
Network: IMM Branch: RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9 -27) Section: 6225 Surface: PCC
Date,
Code
Description'
-,
01/01/1942 ;
IMPORTED
Comments
,.
Date t
Code
True
STIMATE 1942 PCC '. "'
Network: IMM
Branch: RW 4 -22 (RUNWAY 4-22)
01/01/1942
Section: 6330 Surface: PCC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use:
RUNWAY Rank:S Length: 600.00 Ft
Width:
25.00 Ft True Area: 15.000.00 SaF
STIMATE 1942 PCf
Work
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:S Length: 4.205.00 Ft Width: 100.00 Ft True Area: 420.500.00 SaF
Work t_
Work
Ickness
Major
�=
. , a
Date:,
Code
.,
Date,
° . „,.., Description, .,w', �:
Cost
: (in1, -
M&R
Comments �� ._...,
Network: IMM Branch: RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9-27) Section: 6205 Surface: PCC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:S Length: 150.00 Ft Width: 100.00 Ft True Area: 15,000.00 SaF
Work
Work
a fa uWO `.
Work
hlckness
Major
s s � 7 ” V � �r
Date.';
Code
Descripilori ��
Cost
(,n)_
M&R
Comments r
Comments P
01/01/1942 -
IMPORTED
BUILT „ :-
2.00
Zf vd
01/01/1942 '
IMPORTED
BUILT
True
STIMATE 1942 PCC. :-
Network: IMM Branch: RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9 -27) Section: 6210 Surface: PCC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:S Length: 300.00 Ft Width: 25.00 Ft True Area: 7.500.00 SaF
Work
Work
Work
hickne99
Major
Network: IMM Branch: RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9 -27) Section: 6225 Surface: PCC
Date,
Code
Description'
Cost
(in) -,
M&R
Comments
,.
Date t
Code
Description`
Cost
(in) _,
Mgt
01/01/1942
IMPORTED
BUILT y r'
BUILT
True
STIMATE 1942 PCf
Network: IMM Branch: RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9-27) Section: 6215 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:S Length: 4.205.00 Ft Width: 100.00 Ft True Area: 420.500.00 SaF
Work .;. °
Work
Work "
Work . -:
hickness
Major
Major
.,
Date,
Code
�� Description.
Cost
(ln)� °_
Mgt
Comments
Comments
01/0111942'
�,-
BUILT
True
01101/1942
IMPORTED
OVERLAY_
True
STIMATE 1942 AC PAVEMENT
01/01/1942
IMPORTED
BUILT
2.00
True
PAVEMENT SECTION IS 2 "AC ON 87',r,-"
„
IMPORTED
True PMULE
Packet Page -1231-
b.U.J.
Network: IMM Branch: RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9 -27) Section: 6220 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:S Length: 8.410.00 Ft Width: 25.00 Ft True Area: 210.250.00 SaF
Work
Work
Work
Thickness
Major
Date,,
Code
Description,
Cost
(in) _
M8R
Comments P
01/01/1942 -
IMPORTED
BUILT „ :-
2.00
True
PAVEMENT SECTION IS 2" AC ON 8" :. �
ASE ?`
01/0111942
IMPORTED
OVERLAY:- -'
True
ESTIMATE 1`942 AC PAVEMENT
Network: IMM Branch: RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9 -27) Section: 6225 Surface: PCC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:S Length: 300.00 Ft Width: 100.00 Ft True Area: 30.000.00 SaF
Work
Work
Work ..:;
hidcness
Major
Date t
Code
Description`
Cost
(in) _,
Mgt
Comments
01/01/1942
IMPORTED
BUILT
True
STIMATE 1942 PCC PAVEMENT" "_` ` '
Network: IMM Branch: RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9-27) Section: 6230 Surface: PCC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: RUNWAY Rank:S Length: 600.00 Ft Width: 25.00 Ft True Area: 15.000.00 SaF
Work =
Work
Work . -:
hidcness
Major
Code
; '- Description, l,= ,�'
Cost
(_In)
M&R
Comments
01/0111942'
IMPORTED
BUILT
True
kSTIMATE 1`942 PCC PAVEMENT
Packet Page -1231-
b.U.J.
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Work History Report 4 6
Date:05/17/2011 of
Pavement Database:
Network: IMM Branch: TW A (TAXIWAY A) Section: 205 Surface: AC
':.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: TAXIWAY Rank:P Length: 5.551.00 Ft Width: 50.00 Ft True Area: 277.550.00 SaF
Work'
Work
Work .P�
Major
Date
Code
Description E.
Cost
in)
M8R
Com e
01/01/1942.
IMPORTED
BUILT '
'gu 2 0
True
PAVEMENT SECTIONIS
J r.
Y
01/01/1942= '
IMPORTED
OVERLAYS .
True
STI MATE 1 942 AC PAVEMENT
Network: IMM Branch: TW A (TAXIWAY A) Section: 210 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: TAXIWAY Rank:P Length: 469.00 Ft Width: 50.00 Ft True Area: 23.450.00 SaF
Work ..
Work
Works
hiolineis
Major
R
Date
Code
Description'
Cosh)
d
M&R
Comments ,
9
,sl;'
�.,,
01/01/1942
IMPORTED
BUILT - ,
True
STIMAE 1942 AC PAVEMENT
17
01/011,1942 �
IMPORTED
OVERLAY r
2 0
True
,AVEMENT SECTION IS 2 - AC ON 8
Network: IMM Branch: TW A (TAXIWAY A) Section: 220 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: TAXIWAY Rank:P Length: 469.00 Ft Width: 50.00 Ft True Area: 23.450.00 SoF
Work,
Work
-Work"" !
hilliness_
Major'
Comments
Date`:x
Code
4
- Descri conks'
Cost.
M)
01/0 ?/1942: =
IMPORTED
OVERLAY " rf -
!
True
STIMATE 1942 AC PAVEMENT
01/01/1942,
IMPORTED
BUILT
2 0
True
. PAVEMENT SECTION IS 2" AC ON 8" I
ASE? - ,7
Network: IMM Branch: TW B (TAXIWAY B) Section: 105 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: TAXIWAY Rank:P Length: 2.341.00 Ft Width: 50.00 Ft True Area: 117.050.00 SaF
hilt Hess
Major
,
Comments
Date',. ..
Code
Desc Irkion �,
pt
Cost
l;P)
M&R
,
01%1942'
IMPORTED
OVERLAY':"
True
STIMATE 1942 AC
/01/1942,'
IMPORTED
BUILT
00
True
. PAVEMENT SECTION IS 2 AC ON 8
ASE?
Network: IMM Branch: TW B (TAXIWAY B) Section: 110 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: TAXIWAY Rank:P Length: 2.653.00 Ft Width: 50.00 Ft True Area: 132.650.00 SaF
Work:
Work
Work
Cost'
Thickn6ss
Major
Comments
D a t a
Code
Description
(n)q�
M8R
01/01/1942` '
IMPORTED
OVERLAY _',
True
STIMATE 1942 AC PAVEMENT
01/01/1942--
IMPORTED
BUILT ., ''
r ;� -2.00
True
. 2' AC ON 8" BASE?
Network: IMM Branch: TW B (TAXIWAY B) Section: 115 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: TAXIWAY Rank:P Length: 200.00 Ft Width: 50.00 Ft True Area: 10.000.00 SaF
Work
Work
Work
hickness'
Major
°°
Date..,
Code
Description
Cost
(n),k.
Mgt
Comments
01/01/1942'
IMPORTED
BUILT
2.00
True
ST 1942 .. AC SURFACE ON 8' AGG-
ASE
Network: IMM Branch: TW B1 (TAXIWAY B) Section: 405 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01101/1942 Use: TAXIWAY Rank:P Length: 660.00 Ft Width: 50.00 Ft True Area: 33.000.00 SaF
Work
Work
Work.
Cost
hickness
Major
M&R
Comments
Date
Code
�. ...� : Description
n)..
01/01/1942
IMPORTED
BUILT
2.0
True
S 1942 2" AC SURFACE ON 8" AGG w `
Network: IMM Branch: TW B1 (TAXIWAY B) Section: 410 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1942 Use: TAXIWAY Rank:P Length: 1.270.00 Ft Width: 50.00 Ft True Area: 69.493.00 SaF
'York
Work
, Work
hidcness
Major
Comments
date; ', :.
Code
scn ion
De 'pt
Cost
e � 6), i
M&R
01/0111942 c
INITIAL
Initial Construction '- `
$0
0.0
True
Packet Page -1232-
oiz iizu-iz item i
Date:05/17/2011 Work History Report 5 of 6
Pavement Database:
Network: IMM Branch: TW C (TAXIWAY C) Section: 310 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1998 Use: TAXIWAY Rank:S Length: 1.600.00 Ft Width: 35.00 Ft True Area: 56.000.00 SoF
Work '
Work
Work
hickness
Mal or
Comments 2
Date,
Code
Description
Cost
{ in) ',
M&R
r ry t
01/01/1'398'
INITIALlnitielConstruction
..r'?.
$0
.0
True�_?_�.',.
-` 3 "-
Network:
Network: IMM Branch: TW C (TAXIWAY C) Section: 315 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/2007 Use: TAXIWAY Rank:S Length: 1.425.00 Ft Width: 35.00 Ft True Area: 49.875.00 SaF
Work '
Work
Work
hide ss
Date „
Code
„ DescriptionE t
Cost
;
Mal&oRr
Comment%
, ,
01/01/2007" '
INITIAL
I nitial Construction .' �,`� ..
$0
` 0:0
True
Network: IMM Branch: TW TO AP (TAXIWAY TO CROP AP) Section: 305 Surface: AC
L.C.D.: 01/01/1987 Use: TAXIWAY Rank:T Length: 1.260.00 Ft Width: 25.00 Ft True Area: 31.500.00 SaF
Work
Work
Work
Ickness'
°jn)��
Major
�' : � �
Date
Code
Descripttorr
Cost
M&R
Comments,'
01/01/1987
IMPORTED
'BUILT
True
FSTIMATt1981 ACJ?AVEME'NT
Packet Page -1233-
6.G.3.
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Date:05/17/2011 Work History Report 6 of 6 1
Pavement
Summary:
Work Description
Section
Count
Area Total
S Ft
Thickness Avg
(in)
Thi s ness STD
(i n)
BUILT
29
2,302,768.00
2.00
.00
Initial Construction
5
265,768.00
.00
.00
New Construction - AC
2
25,061.00
00
0
OVERLAY
11
2,681,650.00
2.00
.00
STD = Standard Deviation
Packet Page -1234-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
APPENDIX B
2011 CONDITION MAP
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX TABLE
Packet Page -1235-
gg a,:
: o 2 R-O
Ni RWCE
�o �a its
i 9
.! LZ
EL-
P,
V
. O
m c D3S
3 DAD.
r �
0 sM
H
o •
v \ I
' B
a
M
.09I X .000'S 9i-9L AVMNnS
aj
z tx
.v. Avmixri � - d
a a..,
Y
v C1
a
_ ovoa iaoamv _. ..
r�
a�
G
3
a
a
S
Ct �
O �
2' 0„
o
_�
r o
0 4
\a
w�
011
�I
C
O
•r
r
O
U
it
r
MM1
F+I
L
O
O
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
O
L
L O
O
l
U rO.
ZV o S
'G
o
"O
o
o
00
.
0O
4 O
cO �
CO 7
V
0
U
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
rU
r
CN
O
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
N
N
N
CL
CC
M
O
�
R
V]
h b
r U
GQ
C
O
ow
co
m d+
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
U
U
U
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
u
¢
d
u
d
d
0.
0.
0.
a
O.
0.
y
a
O O
0.
0
0.
Z
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
CL
0.
0.
0.
Cn
cn
Ln
un
C/7
o
n
o
-•
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
�
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
q
N
N
00
N
r
M
O
O
N
v'i
M
M
M
k
N
7
N
N
w
O
O
�
-•
O
-+
-+
N
O
O
-
-•
�
N
M
O
-•
N
M
O
-•
-•
N
y~
7
7
7
et
7
7
�G
\O
G
\O
G
G
O
O
Vr
lN0
ci
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
04
0.
0.
Z
z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
N
N
N
V
Q",
C"
V)
Cn
4
i
i
N
N
N
N
N
°
x
c�
�
M.
¢¢¢¢°
x
—
3
—
3
—
3
—
3
—
3
—
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
0.
Z
d
¢
¢
¢
°
x
o:
o:
x
04
x
x
0r
n4
G
cG 24
C4
d
z
M
M
M
�
•�
.�
r"
R
z
m
�
�
�
R
C
C
C
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
l�
r-
[�
r-
L
n
CSC
Z
O
L
O
L
O
L
O
L
C
cc
O
�
Op
�
Op
Op
pp
pp
�
pp
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
,�.
•�
CY
O1
O1
011
O1
W
W
W
0
0
U
04
0x
ce
C4
w
0:
C4
re
0:
m
W
N
4
N
C)
L
W
O pQ
o
o�
0 4
a
? yN
w
N
'O
Li
C
U
a
a
0
r
ri
0
U
C
r
a
.r
s
o
0 0
a°
o
0
a°
o
0
00
0
a°
0
a°
0
Cw
0
o
a
0
0
•w =
U
44
• �
o
V
o
V
U
>
>
v
>
>
>
>
V
r
N
vlV
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
N
00
C�
�O
R
ID
M
1p
N
M
M
t1"
r
t?
00
00
F R
R
���
N
�J
�
�
^-�
N
^•�
N
M
N
H R �
LW
o fl
R
va
cloo
a
a
a
a,
o,
a
a
aV�
CIO
F
�x
L L +'•'
O
O
ct
O
O
7
O
00
F,y Q a'i
O
N
a
O Q
v'�
O
O
O
N
O
O
v1
O
O
O
O Irl
� �"�
�
�
N
N
N
••-
-
�
t7
M
M
M
3_
3_
3_
3_
3_
3_
3_
3_
_3
_3
W
D=
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
CLr
~
N
N
d¢
Q
c0
m
pa
U
U
0
�
c
R
°
z
CL
d
U
O
0.Y
cC
N
cC
O
O
O
O
r
O
CL
O
Ca
a
d
d
d
C1
Cq
oa
m
W
U
U
3
3
3
m
3
o
3
z
3
m
3
m
3
3
3
3
3
c�
3
m
Wco
'
c;z
M
t
M
F-
0
U
7
O
O
w
7
a�
U
N
O.
y
C
.Y
Q
3
0
M
d'
G
O
U
U
Con
N
m
w
N
N
O
N
(D
3
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
APPENDIX C
BRANCH CONDITION REPORT
SECTION CONDITION REPORT
Packet Page -1239-
.. .. ..�. _ __ 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
oranun %.onuitml ISilt: NVI L
Date: 5 /17/2011 1 of 2
Pavement Database: NetworklD: IMM
Number of
Sum Section
Avg Section
True Area
PCI Welghtedz
Use Ave e�
Branch ID
Sections
Length
Width
(SgFt)
Er Standard Average .
(Ft)
(Ft)
,,, Deviation,PCI.
�
eK��y� J
'
AP HANG (APRON TO HANGARS)
1
900.00
25.0
22,500.00
APRON 93 00 0.00 93 DO
�
AP RU RW36 (APRON RUN-UP RW
3
415.00
67.3
33,061.00
APRON 89 6T 7.32 87.30
r }
AP S (SOUTH APRON AND FUELING
RAMPS)
4
876.00
228.75
182,018.00
APRON 8975; 11.54 d .
n
AP SW (SOUTHWEST APRON)
1
100.00
100.0
10,000.00
tr¢¢'
APRONr y 39 00 0.00 r g� 39 00
�d s
�'4�9
RW 18 -36 (RUNWAY 18-36)
6
14,475.00
62.5
723,750.00
RUNWAY ' ` 26 33' 4.27 27 86
RW 4 -22 (RUNWAY 4 -22)
4
1,900.00
62.50
100,000.00
RUNWAY 34.50' 2.29r�
S..
RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9 -27)
6
13,965.00
62.5
698,250.00
RUNWAY ¢ 23 83� 8.47y 27 46
✓ A (TAXIWAY A)
3
6,489.00
50.00
324,450.00
TAXIWAY 24.33; 1.70 24 86
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
3
5,194.00
50.00
259,700.00
TAXIWAY ; 31.00 3.56 30 36.
7 ,}
TWB1 (TAXIWAY B)
2
1,930.00
50.00
102,493.00
TAXIWAY .00 3.00 2993
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
2
3,025.00
35.0
105,875.00
r
TAXIWAY 91.50 2.50 = 91.36
TW TO AP (TAXIWAY TO CROP AP)
1
1,260.00
25.00
31,500.00
TAXIWAY 67.00 0.00 67.00:
Packet Pa>;e - 1240 -
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Date: 5 /17/2011 Branch Condition Report 2 Of 2
Pavement Database:
Use
Category
Number
of
Sections
Total
Area
(SgFt)
Arithmetic
Average
PCI
Average
PCI
STD.
Weighted
Average
PCI
APRON
9
247,579.00
84.44
18.34
86.54
RUNWAY
16
1,522,000.00
27.44
7.27
28.09
TAXIWAY
11
824,018.00
43.45
25.44
37.38
All
36
2,593,597.00
46.58
28.80
36.62
STD = Standard Deviation
Packet Page -1241-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Date: 5 /17/2011 Section Condition Report 1 of 3
Pavement Database: NetworklD: IMM
Last Aye
Branch ID Section ID Last Surface Use Rank Lanes True Area lnspectfori`: At PC1
Const u
Ft �'
S
( 4 ) , , �. Date ,k" Inspection �M�+ ?
AP HANG (APRON TO HANGARS)
4405 01/0311998 ? AC
APRON
P
0
22,500 006 03/28/2014: 13
AP RU RW36 (APRON RUN-UP
4305 01/01/1998 AC
APRON
P
0
8,000.0U 03/28/201f;'r 13
RVV 36)
AP RU RW36 (APRON RUN-UP
4310 ` AC
APRON
P
0
6,309 00 0,1101/2001, 0
LU1/0112601
RW 36)
AP RU RW36 (APRON RUN-UP
4315 b1/01/2002 ` AC
APRON
N
0
18,752.00, 03128/2011 9
RVV 36)
AP S (SOUTH APRON AND
4205 ' �0110111997 :; AC
APRON
P
0
28,000 00 03/28/2014rt' 14
FLIFELING RAMPS)
AP S (SOUTH APRON AND
4210 01/01/1998 'i AC
APRON
P
0
63,618.M 03/2812011. 13
FUELING PAMIRS)
AP S (SOUTH APRON AND
4215 07131/2007;,, AC
APRON
P
0
54,400,M 07/31/2007,1; 0
M-11=1 ING RAMPS)
AP S (SOUTH APRON AND
ING
4220 07/31/2007 AC
APRON
P
0
36,000 00 07/31/2002 0
r=1 1F=l RAMPS)
AP SW (SOUTHWEST APRON)
4105 01/01/1987 � AC
APRON
P
0
10,000.00'03128/201,1 - 24
RW 18-36 (RUNWAY 18-36)
6105 X01/01/1942 , PCC
RUNWAY
P
0
30,000.004,103/28/201 f.: 69
'18-36 (RUNWAY 18-36)
6110 �01/011,J, 2 ! PCC
RUNWAY
P
0
15,000 00 03/28/2011 ' 69
RW 18-36 (RUNWAY 18-36)
6115 01/01/1942! AC
RUNWAY
P
0
422,500.0003128 /2011 69
RW 18 -36 (RUNWAY 18-36)
6120 - X01/01/1942" AC
RUNWAY
P
0
211,250.00, 0312812011: 69
RW 18 -36 (RUNWAY 18-36)
6125 01/01/13942 ", PCC
RUNWAY
P
0
30,000.00 03/28/2011 69
RW 1836 (RUNWAY 18-36)
6130 01/01/1942 ; PCC
RUNWAY
P
0
15,000 00 03/28/201'! " 69
RW 4 -22 (RUNWAY 4-22)
6305 01/01/1942 , ;' PCC
RUNWAY
S
0
15,000.00' 03/28/2011'' 69
RW 4-22 (RUNWAY 4 -22)
6310 01/01/1942: PCC
RUNWAY
S
0
35,000.00 03/28/2011 69
RW 4 -22 (RUNWAY 4 -22)
6325 '01/0111942 - PCC
RUNWAY
S
0
35,000.00103/2181/201111, .' 69
RW 4 -22 (RUNWAY 4 -22)
6330 X01101/1942 -. PCC
RUNWAY
S
0
15,000.00 03/28/2011 69
RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9 -27)
6205 •01/0111942 PCC
RUNWAY
S
0
15,000.00 03/28/2011 69
RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9 -27)
6210 01/01/•1942 „ PCC
RUNWAY
S
0
7,500.00 03/28/2011 ! 69
RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9 -27)
6215 01/01/1942�' AC
RUNWAY
S
0
420,500.00 03/28/2011 °' 69
RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9-27)
6220 X01/01/1942 „' AC
RUNWAY
S
0
210,250.00 03/28/2011 69
9-27 (RUNWAY 9-2 7)
6225 ��011D1/1942 PCC
RUNWAY
S
0
30,000.00 03/28/2011 69
RW 9 -27 (RUNWAY 9 -27)
6230 01/01/1942-l” PCC
RUNWAY
S
0
15,000.00 03/28/201-1j':' �! 69
Packet Page -1242-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Cn�finn i`nnrlifinn Dnrn. -f
Date: 5 /17/2011
" %'"' "'"""" `
2
of 3
Pavement Database: NetworkID: IMM
Branch ID
Section
ID Las _''
Post'?
Surface
Use
Rank
Lanes
True Area "` Est °y Age
Inspectlori AtPC
(SgFt) Date Inspection
'
Date
TWA (TAXIWAY A)
205
01/01/1942 -<<
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
277,550 00 03/28/2091 '
69��
'25,`66
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
210
01/01/1942
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
rt
23,450.00', 03/28/2011 ;
69
y O.j
TW A (TAXIWAY A)
220
01/01/1942:
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
N
23,450 00 03/28/2011' i
69
g22 0U
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
105
.01/01/1942
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
117,050 00 03/28/201
69
r 7 666
,;;
. =z.
M
TW B (TAXIWAY B)
110
AC
TAXIWAY
P
01/01/194,.
0
132,650 00 03/28/2011
69
S47001
TW TW B (TAXIWAY B)
115
k:'f
*01/01/1942`,
TAXIWAY
P
0
10,000.00: 03/2$12011'.
69
"00
TW 61 (TAXIWAY B)
405
,01101/1942.
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
33,000.00'03/28/201 1, ',
6934
00
,ate
TW 61 (TAXIWAY B)
410
01/01/1942 !
AC
TAXIWAY
P
0
69,493.00: 0/28/201iINS
TW C C TAXIWAY
( )
310
01/998
01!1
AC
TAXIWAY
S
0
56,000.00 0312812011''
13
8909.0
K89.00
0
fir: -. ;.Ii
Ft vt ;
TW C (TAXIWAY C)
315
01/01/2007
AC
TAXIWAY
S
0
49,875 00 0312812011`'
4
of
94;00,
TW TO AP (TAXIWAY TO CROP
305
01/01/1987
AC
TAXIWAY
T
0
31,500.00 03/28/2011;'.
24
674'00
Packet Page -1243-
4
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Date: 5 /17/2011 Section Condition Report 3 of 3
Pavement Database:
Age
9e
Category
Age At
Inspection
Total
Area
(SgFt)
Number
of
Sections
Arithmetic
Average
PCI
PCI
Standard
Deviation
Weighted
Average
PCI
0 -02
0.00
96,709.00
3
100.00
0.00
100.00
03 -05
4.00
49,875.00
1
94.00
0.00
94.00
06 -10
9.00
18,752.00
1
84.00
0.00
84.00
11 -15
13.20
178,118.00
5
85.20
7.11
82.94
21-25
24.00
41,500.00
2
53.00
14.00
60.25
over 40
69.00
2,208,643.00
24
27.79
6.45
27.96
All
49.53
2,593,597.00
36
46.58
28.80
36.62
Packet Page -1244-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
APPENDIX D
PAVEMENT CONDITION PREDICTION TABLE
PREDICTED PCI BY PAVEMENT USE GRAPH
Packet Page -1245-
0
O
o>
v
0
0
r
0
a
w
O
i
67
s
�L
ii
0
V
.r
it
r
r
O
.r
r
V
ii
rr
L"
r7
^^C��
F�1
Q
0
W
N
4
N
O
N
O
!i�
V
N
M
p
000
r-
N
w-I
-r
M
M
N
'n
O
M
M
[�
O
�D
l�
O
M
�
kn
�
N
p
00
l-
r-
00
N
N
a
O,
Q
00
N
y
^I
kn
a
�
I�
t�
--'
rt
l�
O
�
tn
N
O
O
M
U
N
L
O
GL
�
�
N
N
en
O
N
N
^
a
^--�
O
W)
kn
^
p
a
o0
DD
o0
07
a
s
M
N
N
N
N
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
'n
M
p
a
o0
00
00
00
l�
a
a
M
N
N
N
N
^�
N
M
M
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
�I
M
vl
Vi
w
N
CN
d'
a
O
M
00
07
\O
p
a
00
00
DD
oo
h
a
s
M
N
N
M
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
i U
M
V'1
�
y
a
o0
00
07
M
N
M
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
;:60
7
U
a
o
v
o
.n
In
o
'n
o
�n
o
'n
o
'n
o
n
'n
~
y
rt
t
r1
M
M
M
M
M
�
�
�
i
�
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
U
�
C1:
C.�
CL
o0
00
00
00
00
�
CS.
CL
CL
CS,
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
E
E
a'
C4
0x
C4
C�
cG
cC
'
DD
07
00
DD
'
DD
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
00
C4
CSC
Q
Q
Q
Q
�,
�,
�,
�,
�,
�,
Y
J
«3
ca
«s
cC
cC
cC
cd
cC
cC
o5
cC
cC
cV
m
cC
0
cC
y
�
�
�
Q
¢
<
�
cn
�
U
c4
cL
04
C4
w
C�
C4
r4
C4
C�
a4
C4
Q�
0
W
N
4
N
O
N
O
!i�
0
O p�
pq O
o
a=
�z
�a
Q
o m
W �
.r
ii
O
U
:rr
O
V
.r
i.
C
O
.r
.rr
nri
O
U
C
A
CC
i�
0
rF
gkow
d^)
W
0
N
O
O
O
O
00
L-
70
N
M
00
--
N
O�
N
00
N
O
�n
M
N
M
00
M
kO
O
N
N
N
l-
00
kn
N
�
N
L
O
G1
~
O
O
N
N
U
r
N
N
0000
000
�
N
.•ti
O
O
O
O
o0
l�
00
N
M
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
o0
00
�D
N
.•�
O
N
00
N
O
�
O
�
kn
O
M
O
74
N
N
M
N
M
N
00
O�
I'D
N
'rl
M
7
O
7
N
V
r-
N
N
a
L V
N
4'IV
N
\O
M
00
O�
7
l-
L�
U
G
uQ
N
O
o
N
O
o
kn
O
o
o
WM
O
Q
0.,
N
Q
N
�
°�3¢¢333mm33°
c
o
ea
c.
z
Q
_
N
Q
Q¢
m
m
p
m
m
m
U
U°
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
iC
iG
iC
X
Y
O
cC
cC
cC
cC
cz
cC
cC
cC
cC
cC
m
cC
cC
0
rF
gkow
d^)
W
Y
Q'
O n�
N �
v N
0
d �
o ry
v �
O �
w �
o
Qj
CC
�I
QI
V
F+H
A
it
rr�
!�I
M
0
CA%
N
N
N
(D
N >
J CC ttS y
L
a.
I
I
O I (
I
Q
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O�
I
.t I
O
N
b
Ib
O
N
O
N
b
O
N L.
R
b
V'1
O
N
I
I
I
a
a
O
N
O
N
N
I
N
0
o
OO Ooh O
O C) O O O O N
aDe rangy pa�q�iaAX egad Ind
I1
M
0
CA%
N
N
N
(D
I
I
I
.t I
b
Ib
b
b
I
I
I
a
a
I
I1
I
t
f
•
0.T^
ry
M
0
CA%
N
N
N
(D
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
APPENDIX E
YEAR 1 MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES TABLE
Packet Page -1249-
Pavement Evaluation Report — Inunokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Table E -1: Year 1 Maintenance Activities
Branch Name
Branch ID
Section
ID
Distress
Description
Distress
Severity
Work Description
Work
Quantity
Work
Unit
Unit
Cost
Work Cost
Apron to Hangars
AP HANG
4405
WEATH/RAVEL
L
Surface Seal - Rejuvenating
300.00
SgFt
$0.40
$120.00
Apron Run -up RW 36
AP RU RW36
4305
OIL SPILLAGE
N
Patching - AC Shallow
48.10
SgFt
$2.90
$139.37
Apron Run -up RW 36
AP RU RW36
4305
WEATH /RAVEL
L
Surface Seal - Rejuvenating
484.80
SgFt
$0.40
$193.94
Apron Run -up RW 36
AP RU RW36
4315
WEATH/RAVEL
L
Surface Seal - Rejuvenating
2,812.80
SgFt
$0.40
$1,125.12
Apron Run -up RW 36
AP RU RW36
4315
OIL SPILLAGE
N
Patching - AC Shallow
38.30
SgFt
$2.90
$110.94
South Apron and Fueling Ramps
AP S
4205
WEATH/RAVEL
L
Surface Seal - Rejuvenating
2,800.00
SgFt
$0.40
$1,120.00
South Apron and Fueling Ramps
AP S
4210
L & T CR
M
Crack Sealing - AC
559.00
Ft
$2.25
$1,257.71
South Apron and Fueling Ramps
AP S
4210
WEATH/RAVEL
L
Surface Seal - Rejuvenating
19,045.00
SgFt
$0.40
$7,618.07
Taxiway Charlie
TW C
310
WEATH/RAVEL
L
Surface Seal - Rejuvenating
569.90
SgFt
$0.40
$227.96
Taxiway Charlie
TW C
315
WEATH/RAVEL
L
Surface Seal - Rejuvenating
47.50
SgFt
$0.40
$19.00
Taxiway to Crop Apron
TW TO AP
305
WEATH/RAVEL
L
Surface Seal - Rejuvenating
22,049.80
SgFt
$0.40
$8,820.00
Taxiway to Crop Apron
TW TO AP
305
L & T CR
M
Crack Sealing - AC
9 L40
Ft
$2.25
$205.59
Total =
$20,957.70
E -1
'£'9'91, well Z1,0Z /LZ /£
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
APPENDIX F
MAJOR M &R PLAN BY YEAR UNDER UNLIMITED FUNDING
SCENARIO TABLE
Packet Page -1251-
Q
O Y
O
fy' �
d �
N �
ti
O �
ce, tj
o a,
o �
a y
W �
? O
4r LL
O
r
r
W
V
:i
.r
ii
id
.rn
.r
it
a�
it
Cn
co
G'3
a
in
.cl
r1
r
Ri
L
� r�I
w
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U�
a
C
C
C
C
C
C
O
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
O
O
S7
C
C
C
C
O
C
•�
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
.O
•U
•U
.O
.O
y
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
�/
C
C
i
O
C
❑
C
G
C
=
O
C
O
❑
C
C
❑
C
C
C
❑
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0 O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0 O
O
O
O
,a/�
a�
a ✓�
a//�
a�
a�
a�
a�
a�
a,//�
a,//�
Qi
a�
a�
a�
a�
a�
a�
a�
Qi
a�
a�
a�
l-
C}'
O\
to
\O
[-,
M
\O
M
M
[r
M
O
O
N
N
-7
O
O
O
^
kn
O
C
O
v�
O
v'i
O
O
^
kn
Cl
M
N
O
O
M
N
O
•-�
O
�n
^�
O
O
O
M
o0
=
N
�O
O
o0
7
�t
l�
00
o0
00
�D
.Ma
�t
N
l�
M
o0
7
O
O,
D;
.4
n
4
kn
L+ O
O
U
vj
N
V'1
N
M
R
6R
69
69
69
69
4jS
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
64
64
69
69
64
69
69
64
6R
69
a,
a'
a•
cr
a
V)
a
V)
6
Cn
cr
V)
C
V]
o'
V)
G'
V)
a
n
p
U
C/]
O
V1
O
Ln
C
�
C
V)
C
V)
O
V)
C
V]
O
O
C
V)
C
O
O
C
O
O
y
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
�n
v'�
O
`O
O
O
O
O
O
O
kr
O
kn
O
O
O
Vl
O
kn
kr
O
O
p
k'i
tt
N
M
M
7
N
N
N
N
^
M
G
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
(�
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Q
U
U¢
Q
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Q¢
U
U¢¢¢¢¢
Q
N
a
tn
o
kn
o
kn
•; A
O
O
^-
^"
N
M
M
ON
N
N
N
O
^-
N
O
-
M
N
N
N
C�
V
V
'V
V
cC
cC
aS
O
O
O
Q
�
�
00
�
�
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
cz
o•
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3.
w
m
m
m
°
U
a
a�
cG
cC
c�
cG
�
�
C
c.✓
�
�
o:
cG
a�
r�
E�
tz
E-
E-
E�
E�
E-
C4
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
LL
co
N
4
N
O
N
CD
3
f o
0
y
O
'pp O
N �
v �
O pp
O fl,
0
W �
N�
C', LZ
^O
u
C
O
U
0
CC
r
V
w
u
w
.r
r
C
i.
r
'r
C'S
A
�a
Fil
i.
0
C�
w
u
�I
L
cz
W
N
y
O
y
N
rn
U �
a
G.)
w
c
c
ca
y
o
o
0
c
0
c
c
Cti
o
o
ca
cc
L Ci
w..i
U D Q�
�Q
v,
Vi
Ln
O O
M
�
N
69
64
69
69
-.
r
ri
w
Ll.
N
u
rn
M
1p
M
1p
u y
U
U
U
U
C
C.
cc
cc
ce
tC
CG
RS
¢
3
3
3
s
N
C
O
cz
W
N
y
O
y
N
rn
G.)
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
APPENDIX G
10 -YEAR M &R MAP
Packet Page -1254-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
APPENDIX H
PHOTOGRAPHS
Packet Page -1256-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Runway 9 -27, Section 6225, Sample Unit 388 — Low, medium and high severity (62) Corner Break, (63) LTD Cracking, (65) Joint Seal Damage,
(70) Scaling/Map Cracking, (72) Shattered Slabs, (73) Shrinkage Cracks, (74) Joint Spalling, (75) Comer Spalling
Runway 9 -27, Section 6225, Sample Unit 388 — Low, medium and high severity (62) Comer Break, (63) LTD Cracking, (65) Joint Seal Damage,
(70) Scaling /Map Cracking, (72) Shattered Slabs, (73) Shrinkage Cracks, (74) Joint Spalling, (75) Comer Spalling
H -1
Packet Page -1257-
W
e� F
J �
".f�y i4�ba✓�y - Not
y
.iii* _:� �t.'�^7.'F ,.' r "' �-• 4;
11 do'
. ...........
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Runway 18 -36, Section 6125, Sample Unit 392 — Low, medium and high severity (62) Comer Break, (63) LTD Cracking, (65) Joint Seal
Damage, (70) Scaling /Map Cracking, (72) Shattered Slabs, (73) Shrinkage Cracks, (74) Joint Spalling, (75) Comer Spalling
Runway 18 -36, Section 6125, Sample Unit 392 — Low, medium and high severity (62) Corner Break, (63) LTD Cracking, (65) Joint Seal
Damage, (70) Scaling /Map Cracking, (72) Shattered Slabs, (73) Shrinkage Cracks, (74) Joint Spalling, (75) Comer Spalling
H -3
Packet Page -1259-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Taxiway A -1, Section 210, Sample Unit 201 —Medium severity (43) Block Cracking, medium severity (50) Patch, medium severity (52)
Weathering and Raveling
Taxiway A -1, Section 210, Sample Unit 201 —Medium severity (43) Block Cracking, medium severity (50) Patch, medium severity (52)
Weathering and Raveling
H -5
Packet Page -1261-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Taxiway Bravo, Section 105, Sample Unit 108 — Low and medium severity (43) Block Cracking, medium severity (52) Weathering and Raveling
Taxiway Bravo, Section 105, Sample Unit 108 — Low and medium severity (43) Block Cracking, medium severity (52) Weathering and Raveling
H -6
Packet Page -1262-
Kafir
�
Taxiway Bravo, Section 105, Sample Unit 108 — Low and medium severity (43) Block Cracking, medium severity (52) Weathering and Raveling
H -6
Packet Page -1262-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Pavement Evaluation Report — Immokalee Regional Airport
Florida Statewide Pavement Management Program
May 2011
Apron, Section 4210, Sample Unit 203 — Low severity (48) Longitudinal and Transverse Cracking, low severity (50) Patch ,low severity (52)
Weathering and Raveling
H -7
Packet Page -1263-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
APPENDIX I
PCI RE- INSPECTION REPORT
Packet Page -1264-
Re- inspection Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Branch: AP HANG Name: APRON TO HANGARS
Use: APRON
Area: 22,500.00SgFt
Section: 4405 of 1 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1998
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC
Zone:
Category:
Rank: P
Area: 22,500.00SgFt Length: 900.0017t
Width:
25.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc3/28/2011 Total Samples: 4 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:93.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 200 Type: R Area:
7,500.00SgFt
PCI = 93
Sample Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
100.00 SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
39.01 Ft
Comments:
Packet Page -1265-
Re- inspection Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
work:
IMM
Name:
IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch:
AP RU RW36
Name:
APRON RUN -UP RW 36 Use: APRON Area: 33,061.o0SgFt
Section: 4305 of 3 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1998
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 8,000.00sgFt Length: 150.0017t Width: 50.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00 Lanes: o
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3/28/2011 Total Samples: 1 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:85.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 201 Type: R Area: 6,600.o0SgFt PCI = 85
Sample Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING L 400.00 SgFt Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING L 130.03 Ft Comments:
49 OIL SPILLAGE N 20.00 SgFt Comments:
Packet Page -1266-
Re- inspection Report
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
PPINOW
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
`armor
Branch: AP RU RW36 Name: APRON RUN -UP RW 36 Use: APRON Area: 33,061.00SgFt
Section: 4310 of 3 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/2001
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 6,309.00SgFt Length: 80.00Ft Width: 66.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datel /1/2001 Total Samples: 0 Surveyed: 0
Conditions: PCI:100.00
Inspection Comments: Construction/Major M &R inspection record.
Sample Number: Type:
<NO SAMPLE RECORDS>
Area: 0.00
Packet Page -1267-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
✓ork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: AP RU RW36 Name: APRON RUN -UP RW 36
Use: APRON
Area: 33,061.00SgFt
Section: 4315 of 3 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/2002
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC
Zone:
Category:
Rank: N
Area: 18,752.00SgFt Length: 185.00Ft
Width:
86.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 1 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:84.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 101 Type: R Area:
4,300.00SgFt
PCI = 84
Sample Comments:
49 OIL SPILLAGE
N
4.00 SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
644.99 SgFt
Comments:
50 PATCHING
L
1.00 SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1268-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: AP S Name: SOUTH APRON AND FUELING R Use: APRON Area: 182,018.00SgFt
Section: 4205 of 4 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1997
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 28,000.00SgFt Length: 140.0017t Width: 200.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 5 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:87.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 300 Type: R Area: 5,000.00SgFt PCI = 87
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING L 9.00 Ft Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING L 500.00 SgFt Comments:
raz
Packet Page -1269-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
?vork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: AP S Name: SOUTH APRON AND FUELING R
Use: APRON
Area: 182,018.00SgFt
Section: 4210 of 4 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1998
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: P
Area: 63,618.o0SgFt Length: 216.0017t
Width: 355.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00 Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 5 Surveyed: 2
Conditions: PCI:72.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 104 Type: R Area:
4,584.00SgFt
PCI = 69
Sample Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L 687.99
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M 100.03
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L 210.05
Ft
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L 108.00
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 203 Type: R Area:
6,800.00SgFt
PCI = 74
Sample Comments:
50 PATCHING
L 1.50
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L 100.03
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L 2,719.98
SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1270-
Re- inspection Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Netwnrl- TXAM Name• IMMnICAT PP ATRPORT
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Branch: AP S Name: SOUTH APRON AND FUELING R Use: APRON Area: 182,018.00SgFt
Section: 4215 of 4 From: - To: - Last Const.: 7/31/2007
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 54,400.00SgFt Length: 340.00Ft Width: 160.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00 Lanes: o
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc7/31/2007 Total Samples: o Surveyed: 0
Conditions: PC1:1 00.00
Inspection Comments: Construction/Major M &R inspection record.
Sample Number: Type:
<NO SAMPLE RECORDS>
Area: 0.00
Packet Page -1271-
Q
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
vork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: AP S Name: SOUTH APRON AND FUELING R Use: APRON Area: 182,018.o0SgFt
Section: 4220 of 4 From: - To: - Last Const.: 7/31/2007
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 36,000.00SgFt Length: 180.00Ft Width: 200.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: o
Section Comments:
Last Insp. DatE7/31/2007 Total Samples: o Surveyed: 0
Conditions: PCI:100.00
Inspection Comments: Construction/Major M &R inspection record.
Sample Number: Type: Area: 0.00
<NO SAMPLE RECORDS>
Packet Page -1272-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: AP SW Name: SOUTHWEST APRON Use: APRON Area: 10,O00.00SgFt
Section: 4105 of l From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1987
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -AP -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: I0,000.00SgFt Length: I00.00Ft Width: 100.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00 Lanes: o
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3/28/2011 Total Samples: 2 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:39.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 201 Type: R Area: 5,000.o0SgFt PCI = 39
Sample Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING M 4,999.96 SgFt Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING L 30.01 Ft Comments:
1W
Packet Page -1273-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Rork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 18 -36 Name: RUNWAY 18 -36 Use: RUNWAY Area: 723,750.o0SgFt
Section: 6105 of 6 From: -
Surface: PCC Family: FDOT -GA -PCC
Area: 30,000.00SgFt Length: 300.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes:
Section Comments:
Zone:
Width:
0
To: -
Category:
I00.00Ft
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Rank: P
Last Insp. Date3/28/2011 Total Samples: 6 Surveyed: 2
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
L
Conditions: PCI:28.00
Slabs
Comments:
L
22.00
Inspection Comments:
Comments:
L
8.00
Slabs
Sample Number: 301 Type: R Area:
24.00Slabs
22.00
Slabs
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
8.00
Slabs
Comments:
M
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
M
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
12.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
12.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
3.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
9.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
M
3.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
9.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
M
11.00
Slabs
Comments:
Sample Number: 303 Type: R
_ole Comments:
JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
SCALING /CRAZING
74 JOINT SPALLING
63 LINEAR CRACKING
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
75 CORNER SPALLING
63 LINEAR CRACKING
62 CORNER BREAK
74 JOINT SPALLING
Area:
24.00SIabs
PCI = 28
M
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
L
23.00
Slabs
Comments:
L
22.00
Slabs
Comments:
L
8.00
Slabs
Comments:
N
22.00
Slabs
Comments:
L
8.00
Slabs
Comments:
M
9.00
Slabs
Comments:
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
M
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
Packet Page -1274-
Re- inspection Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 18 -36 Name: RUNWAY 18 -36 Use: RUNWAY Area: 723,750.00SgFt
Section: 6110 of 6 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: PCC Family: FDOT -GA -PCC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 15,000.00SgFt Length: 600.00Ft Width: 25.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 3 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:31.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: loo Type: R
Area:
24.00Slabs
PCI = 31
Sample Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
M
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
17.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
11.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
8.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
3.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
6.00
Slabs
Comments:
62 CORNER BREAK
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
62 CORNER BREAK
M
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
M
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
Packet Page -1275-
Packet Page -1276-
Re- inspection Report
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
.pork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 18 -36 Name: RUNWAY 18 -36
Use: RUNWAY
Area: 723,750.00SgFt
Section: 6115 of 6 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -RW -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: P
Area: 422,500.00SgFt Length: 4,225.0017t
Width:
I00.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00
Lanes:
o
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 106 Surveyed: 17
Conditions: PCI:28.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 305 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
1,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
1,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 311 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 29
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 316 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
,ple Comments:
BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
BLOCK CRACKING
L
999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 320 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,799.98
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
153.04
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,346.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 324 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,855.98
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
50.01
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
16.00
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 327 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 37
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
1,949.98
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 333 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
1,549.99
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
362.09
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
iple Number: 339 Type: R
Area:
5,OOO.00SgFt
PCI = 26
ple Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
314.08
Ft
Comments:
Packet Page -1276-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE
CRACKING
L
22.01
Ft
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
1,599.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 345 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 25
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE
CRACKING
M
293.08
Ft
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,499.98
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 351 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 26
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE
CRACKING
M
251.06
Ft
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,599.98
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 357 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,699.98
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE
CRACKING
M
150.04
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 363 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE
CRACKING
M
402.10
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
1,049.99
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 369 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,599.98
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE
CRACKING
M
196.05
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 375 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 24
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE
CRACKING
M
316.08
Ft
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,049.98
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE
CRACKING
M
80.02
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 378 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE
CRACKING
M
374.10
Ft
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
1,499.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 383 Type: R Area: 5,000.00SgFt PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING M 172.04 Ft Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING M 2,549.98 SgFt Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING M 4,499.96 SgFt Comments:
Sample Number: 387 Type: R Area: 5,000.00SgFt PCI = 34
Sample Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING M 4,499.96 SgFt Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING M 198.05 Ft Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING M 954.99 SgFt Comments:
Packet Page -1277-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
,vork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 18 -36 Name: RUNWAY 18 -36
Use: RUNWAY
Area: 723,750.00SgFt
Section: 6120 of 6 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -RW -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: P
Area: 211,250.00SgFt Length: 8,450.00Ft
Width:
25.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00
Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3/28/2011 Total Samples: 53 Surveyed:
8
Conditions: PCI:29.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 108 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
12.00
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 118 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 21
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
642.16
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
53.01
Ft
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,987.96
SgFt
Comments:
-iple Number: 150 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 29
le Comments:
4o LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
50.01
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
787.20
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 182 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgPt
PCI = 30
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
700.18
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
62.02
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 504 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 25
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
18.00
Ft
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 534 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 30
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
111.03
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
725.19
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 542 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 33
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
570.15
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
16.00
Ft
Comments:
WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1278-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Sample Number: 566 Type: R Area: 5,000.00SgFt PCI = 35
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING M 628.16 Ft Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING M 4,499.96 SgFt Comments:
Packet Page -1279-
Packet Page -1280-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Re- inspection
Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
vork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 18 -36 Name: RUNWAY 18 -36
Use: RUNWAY
Area: 723,750.00SgFt
Section: 6125 of 6 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: PCC Family: FDOT -GA -PCC
Zone:
Category:
Rank: P
Area: 30,000.00SgFt Length: 300.00Ft
Width: 100.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00
Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 6 Surveyed: 2
Conditions: PC1:18.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 390 Type: R
Area:
24.00Slabs
PCI = 16
Sample Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
M
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
20.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
10.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
M
6.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
7.00
Slabs
Comments:
62 CORNER BREAK
M
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
M
9.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
5.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
H
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
H
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
M
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
SCALING /CRAZING
L
21.00
Slabs
Comments:
Sample Number: 392 Type: R
Area:
24.00Stabs
PCI = 21
Sample Comments: SAMPLE UNIT RENAMED ON 6/20/05
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
H
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
71 FAULTING
L
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
16.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
6.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
M
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
M
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
16.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
9.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
6.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
H
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
H
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
Packet Page -1280-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 18 -36 Name: RUNWAY 18 -36 Use: RUNWAY Area: 723,750.00SgFt
Section: 6130 of 6 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: PCC Family: FDOT -GA -PCC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 15,000.00SgFt Length: 600.00Ft Width: 25.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3/28/2011 Total Samples: 3 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PC1:24.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: loo Type: R
Area:
24.00Slabs
PCI = 24
Sample Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
H
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
20.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
11.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
17.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
3.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
M
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
M
3.00
Slabs
Comments:
Packet Page -1281-
Re- inspection Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
vork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Branch: RW 4 -22 Name: RUNWAY 4 -22 Use: RUNWAY Area: I00,000.00SgFt
Section: 6305 of 4 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/7942
Surface: PCC Family: FDOT -GA -PCC Zone: Category: Rank: S
Area: 15,000.00SgFt Length: 600.00Ft Width: 25.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 1 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:37.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: Ioo Type: R
Area:
25.00Slabs
PCI = 37
Sample Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
M
25.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
16.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
9.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
M
6.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
10.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
12.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
8.00
Slabs
Comments:
62 CORNER BREAK
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
M
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
Packet Page -1282-
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 4 -22 Name: RUNWAY 4 -22
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Use: RUNWAY Area: 100,000.00SgFt
Section: 6310 of 4 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: PCC Family: FDOT -GA -PCC
Zone:
Category:
Rank: S
Area: 35,000.00SgFt Length: 350.0017t
Width: 100.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00
Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3/28/2011 Total Samples: 3
Surveyed: 2
Conditions: PCI:36.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 301 Type: R
Area:
24.00Slabs
PCI = 30
Sample Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
M
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
M
13.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
11.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
12.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
8.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
11.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
11.00
Slabs
Comments:
Sample Number: 303 Type: R
Area:
24.00Slabs
PCI = 43
Sample Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
M
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
11.00
Slabs
Comments: ,
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
16.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
15.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
5.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
10.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
M
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
Packet Page -1283-
Packet Page -1284-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Re- inspection
Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
cork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 4 -22 Name: RUNWAY 4 -22
Use: RUNWAY
Area: 100,000.00SgFt
Section: 6325 of 4 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: Pcc Family: FDOT- GA -PCC
Zone:
Category:
Rank: S
Area: 35,000.00SgFt Length: 350.0017t
Width: 100.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00
Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 3 Surveyed: 2
Conditions: PCI:31.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 395 Type: R
Area:
24.00Slabs
PCI = 31
Sample Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
H
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
17.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
5.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
18.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
M
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
6.00
Slabs
Comments:
62 CORNER BREAK
L
3.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
M
5.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
6.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
-•iple Number: 398 Type: R
Area:
24.00Slabs
PCI = 30
le Comments:
JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
H
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
15.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
22.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
M
6.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
11.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
M
3.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
62 CORNER BREAK
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
3.00
Slabs
Comments:
Packet Page -1284-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 4 -22 Name: RUNWAY 4 -22 Use: RUNWAY Area: 100,000.00SgFt
Section: 6330 of 4 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: PCC Family: FDOT -GA -PCC Zone: Category: Rank: S
Area: 15,000.00SgFt Length: 600.00Ft Width: 25.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc3/28/2011 Total Samples: 1 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:34.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 195 Type: R
Area:
24.00Slabs
PCI = 34
Sample Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
H
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
20.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
7.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
8.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
7.00
Slabs
Comments:
w
Packet Page -1285-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Nork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 9 -27 Name: RUNWAY 9 -27 Use: RUNWAY Area: 698,250.00SgFt
Section: 6205 of 6 From: - To: - Last Const.: I/l/1942
Surface: PCC Family: FDOT -GA -PCC Zone: Category: Rank: S
Area: 15,000.00SgFt Length: 150.0017t Width: 100.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc3/28/2011 Total Samples: 3 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:29.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 301 Type: R
Sample Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
74 JOINT SPALLING
63 LINEAR CRACKING
63 LINEAR CRACKING
75 CORNER SPALLING
75 CORNER SPALLING
74 JOINT SPALLING
70 SCALING /CRAZING
Area:
24.00Slabs
PCI = 29
M
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
L
8.00
Slabs
Comments:
L
11.00
Slabs
Comments:
M
10.00
Slabs
Comments:
L
3.00
Slabs
Comments:
M
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
M
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
L
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
Packet Page -1286-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 9 -27 Name: RUNWAY 9 -27 Use: RUNWAY Area: 698,250.00SgFt
Section: 6210 of 6 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: PCC Family: FDOT -GA -PCC
Zone:
Category:
Rank: S
Area: 7,500.00SgFt Length: 300.00Ft
Width:
25.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00 Lanes:
o
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 1 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:26.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: loo Type: R Area:
12.00slabs
PCI = 26
Sample Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
M
12.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
8.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
66 SMALL PATCH
L
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
Packet Page -1287-
Packet Page -1288-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Re- inspection
Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
work: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 9 -27 Name: RUNWAY 9 -27
Use: RUNWAY
Area: 698,250.00SgFt
Section: 6215 of 6 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -RW -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: S
Area: 420,500.00SgFt Length: 4,205.00Ft
Width: I00.o0Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00
Lanes:
o
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc3/28/2011 Total Samples: 105 Surveyed: 17
Conditions: PCI:28.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 304 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M 2,499.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L 999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M 4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 306 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M 3,249.97
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L 500.00
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M 4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 311 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00sgFt
PCI = 28
"-- role Comments:
BLOCK CRACKING
M 2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
BLOCK CRACKING
L 749.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M 4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 316 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M 2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L 749.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M 4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 321 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M 2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L 749.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M 4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 326 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 36
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M 300.00
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L 999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M 4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 331 Type: R
Area:
5,000.o0SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M 2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L 999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M 4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
'ple Number: 336 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
,le Comments:
4:3 BLOCK CRACKING
M 2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1288-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 342 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 346 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
3,499.97
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 351 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 360 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 365 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
fIR.
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 371 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 26
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
3,749.97
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
749.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 377 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 26
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 380 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 26
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 383 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 26
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Aw
--
Packet Page -1289-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
vork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 9 -27 Name: RUNWAY 9 -27
Use: RUNWAY
Area: 698,250.00SgFt
Section: 6220 of 6 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -RW -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: S
Area: 210,250.00SgFt Length: 8,410.0017t
Width:
25.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00
Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Dat23/28/2011 Total Samples: 53 Surveyed: 8
Conditions: PCI:28.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 106 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00sgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
3,249.97
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 126 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 142 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 33
•vle Comments:
BLOCK CRACKING
M
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
BLOCK CRACKING
L
3,249.97
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 168 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,499.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
1,499.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 510 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 33
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
500.00
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 534 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 560 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 27
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
999.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
ple Number: 576 Type: R
Area:
5,000.0osgFt
PCI = 26
le Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,499.98
SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1290-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
43 BLOCK CRACKING L 1,999.98 SgFt Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING M 4,499.96 SgFt Comments:
Packet Page -1291-
Packet Page -1292-
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Re- inspection
Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
vork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 9 -27 Name: RUNWAY 9 -27
Use: RUNWAY
Area: 698,250.00SgFt
Section: 6225 of 6 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: PCC Family: FDOT -GA -PCC
Zone:
Category:
Rank: S
Area: 30,000.00SgFt Length: 300.00Ft
Width: IOO.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00
Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3/28/2011 Total Samples: 6 Surveyed: 2
Conditions: PCI:27.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 386 Type: R
Area:
24.00Slabs
PCI = 29
Sample Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
M
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
17.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
12.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
8.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
10.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
5.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
M
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
M
7.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
7.00
Slabs
Comments:
62 CORNER BREAK
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
H
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
ple Number: 388 Type: R
Area:
24.00Slabs
PCI = 25
6a nple Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
H
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
10.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
18.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
10.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
H
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
M
7.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
7.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
5.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
62 CORNER BREAK
M
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
M
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
62 CORNER BREAK
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
Packet Page -1292-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: RW 9 -27 Name: RUNWAY 9 -27 Use: RUNWAY Area: 698,250.00SgFt
Section: 6230 of 6 From: -
Surface: PCC Family: FDOT -GA -PCC
Area: 15,000.00SgFt Length: 600.0017t
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00 Lanes:
Section Comments:
Zone:
Width:
o
To: -
Category:
25.0017t
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Rank: S
Last Insp. Datc3/28/2011 Total Samples: 3 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:5.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 186 Type: R Area:
24.00Slabs
PCI = 5
Sample Comments:
65 JOINT SEAL DAMAGE
M
24.00
Slabs
Comments:
75 CORNER SPALLING
L
4.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
M
13.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
M
3.00
Slabs
Comments:
74 JOINT SPALLING
L
19.00
Slabs
Comments:
73 SHRINKAGE CRACKING
N
2.00
Slabs
Comments:
70 SCALING /CRAZING
L
5.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
H
7.00
Slabs
Comments:
62 CORNER BREAK
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
63 LINEAR CRACKING
L
1.00
Slabs
Comments:
A
v
Packet Page -1293-
Packet Page -1294-
Re- inspection Report
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
,vork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: TW A Name: TAXIWAY A
Use: TAXIWAY
Area: 324,450.00SgFt
Section: 205 of 3 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -TW -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: P
Area: 277,550.00SgFt Length: 5,551.00Ft
Width:
50.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00
Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc3/28/2011 Total Samples: 69 Surveyed: 6
Conditions: PCI:25.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 103 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
3,999.97
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,499.96
SgFt
Comments:
50 PATCHING
L
6.00
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 113 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 25
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 123 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 25
Sample Comments:
^' BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 133 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 23
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
3,499.97
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
55.01
Ft
Comments:
50 PATCHING
M
4.00
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 143 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 25
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 152 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 22
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
490.13
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
1,499.99
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
20.01
Ft
Comments:
Packet Page -1294-
Re- inspection Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: TW A Name: TAXIWAY A Use: TAXIWAY Area: 324,450.00SgFt
Section: 210 of 3 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -TW -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 23,450.00SgFt Length: 469.00Ft Width: 50.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 6 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:26.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 201 Type: R
Sample Comments:
50 PATCHING
43 BLOCK CRACKING
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
Area: 5,000.00SgFt
M 150.00 SgFt
M 3,999.97 SgFt
M 4,499.96 SgFt
Packet Page -1295-
PCI = 26
Comments:
Comments:
Comments:
w
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
work: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: TW A Name: TAXIWAY A Use: TAXIWAY Area: 324,450.00SgFt
Section: 220 of 3 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -TW -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 23,450.00SgFt Length: 469.00Ft Width: 50.0017t
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 6 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:22.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 301 Type: R Area: 5,000.00SgFt PCI = 22
Sample Comments:
50 PATCHING M 150.00 SgFt Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING M 4,999.96 SgFt Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING M 4,999.96 SgFt Comments:
Packet Page -1296-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: TW B Name: TAXIWAY B
Use: TAXIWAY
Area: 259,700.00SgFt
Section: 105 of 3 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/l/1942
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -TW -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: P
Area: 117,050.00SgFt Length: 2,341.00Ft
Width: 50.0017t
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00
Lanes:
o
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 29 Surveyed: 4
Conditions: PCI:26.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 102 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 32
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M 500.13
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L 63.02
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M 4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 108 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 25
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M 2,499.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L 1,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M 4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 114 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 24
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M 3,499.97
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L 1,199.99
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M 4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 120 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 21
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L 1,199.99
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M 3,599.97
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M 4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
50 PATCHING
M 3.00
SgFt
Comments:
v
Packet Page -1297-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Nork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: TW B Name: TAXIWAY B
Use: TAXIWAY
Area: 259,700.00SgFt
Section: 110 of 3 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -TW -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: P
Area: 132,650.00SgFt Length: 2,653.0017t
Width:
50.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00
Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc3/28/2011 Total Samples: 33 Surveyed: 4
Conditions: PCI:34.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 104 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 33
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
320.08
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
143.04
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 1 1 o Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 43
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
12.00
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
150.04
Ft
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,399.98
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
4,999.92
SgFt
Comments:
` -tple Number: 116 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00sgFt
PCI = 24
le Comments:
4� BLOCK CRACKING
L
1,999.98
SgFt
Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
M
2,599.98
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
Sample Number: 122 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 33
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
249.06
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
200.05
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1298-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: TW B Name: TAXIWAY B Use: TAXIWAY Area: 259,700.00SgFt
Section: 115 of 3 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -TW -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 10,000.00SgFt Length: 200.00Ft Width: 50.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.0o Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc3 /28/2011 Total Samples: 3 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:33.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 123 Type: R Area: 5,000.00SgFt PCI = 33
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING M 500.13 Ft Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING L 31.01 Ft Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING M 4,999.96 SgFt Comments:
Packet Page -1299-
Sample Number: 101 Type: R
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
Sample Number: 104 Type: R
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
Re- inspection Report
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
400.10
Ft
Comments:
Report Generated Date:
5/17/2011
Ft
Comments:
Site Name:
4,799.96
SgFt
Comments:
work: IMM
Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
PCI = 33
Branch: TW B1
Name: TAXIWAY B
Use: TAXIWAY
Area: 102,493.00SgFt
Section: 405
of 2 From: -
To: -
Last Const.: l/l/1942
Surface: AC
Family: FDOT- GA -TW -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: P
Area: 33,000.00SgFt
Length: 660.00Ft
Width: 50.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00
Lanes: o
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc3 /28/2011
Total Samples: 4 Surveyed: 2
Conditions: PCI:34.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 101 Type: R
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
Sample Number: 104 Type: R
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 34
M
400.10
Ft
Comments:
L
320.08
Ft
Comments:
M
4,799.96
SgFt
Comments:
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 33
L
281.07
Ft
Comments:
M
470.12
Ft
Comments:
M
4,999.96
SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1300-
Re- inspection Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Branch: TW B1 Name: TAXIWAY B Use: TAXIWAY Area: 102,493.00SgFt
Section: 410 of 2 From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1942
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -TW -AC Zone: Category: Rank: P
Area: 69,493.00SgFt Length: 1,270.00Ft Width: 50.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00 Lanes: 0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3i28 2011 Total Samples: 1 Surveyed: 1
Conditions: PCI:28.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 187 Type: R
Area:
I0,000.00SgFt
PCI = 28
Sample Comments:
50 PATCHING
M
6.00
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
950.24
Ft
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
376.10
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
M
9,999.92
SgFt
Comments:
v
v
Packet Page -1301-
Re- inspection Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
,vork: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: TW C Name: TAXIWAY C Use: TAXIWAY Area: 105,875.00SgFt
Section: 310 of 2 From: 1 +oo To: 17 +00 Last Const.: 1/1/1998
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -TW -AC Zone: Category: Rank: S
Area: 56,000.00SgFt Length: 1,600.00Ft Width: 35.0017t
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00 Lanes: o
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Date3i28i2011 Total Samples: 14 Surveyed: 2
Conditions: PCI:89.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 102 Type: R
Sample Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
Sample Number: log Type: R
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
Area: 3,724.00SgFt PCI = 98
L 30.00 SgFt Comments:
Area: 4,137.00SgFt PCI = 82
L 219.06 Ft Comments:
L 50.00 SgFt Comments:
Packet Page -1302-
Re- inspection Report 3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
Network: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
Branch: TW C Name: TAXIWAY C
Use: TAXIWAY
Area: 105,875.00SgFt
Section: 315 of 2 From: 1 +00
To: 15 +25
Last Const.: l/l/2007
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -TW -AC
Zone: Category:
Rank: S
Area: 49,875.00SgFt Length: 1,425.00Ft
Width: 35.0017t
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: 0.00
Lanes:
0
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc3/28/2011 Total Samples: 18 Surveyed: 3
Conditions: PC1:94.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: 102 Type: R
Area:
3,500.00SgFt
PCI = 95
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L 40.01 Ft
Comments:
Sample Number: 107 Type: R
Area:
3,500.00SgFt
PCI = 95
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L 37.01 Ft
Comments:
Sample Number: 201 Type: R
Area:
3,500.00SgFt
PCI = 91
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L 70.02 Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L 10.00 SgFt
Comments:
Packet Page -1303-
Re- inspection Report
FDOT
Report Generated Date: 5/17/2011
Site Name:
work: IMM Name: IMMOKALEE AIRPORT
3/27/2012 Item 16.G.3.
Branch: TW TO AP Name: TAXIWAY TO CROP AP Use: TAXIWAY Area: 31,500.00SgFt
Section: 305 of l From: - To: - Last Const.: 1/1/1987
Surface: AC Family: FDOT- GA -TW -AC Zone: Category: Rank: T
Area: 31,500.00SgFt Length: 1,260.00Ft Width: 25.00Ft
Shoulder: Street Type: Grade: o.00 Lanes: o
Section Comments:
Last Insp. Datc3/28/2011 Total Samples: 8 Surveyed: 2
Conditions: PC1:67.00
Inspection Comments:
Sample Number: l oo Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 67
Sample Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
174.04
Ft
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
3,499.97
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
M
29.01
Ft
Comments:
Sample Number: 103 Type: R
Area:
5,000.00SgFt
PCI = 67
Sample Comments:
43 BLOCK CRACKING
L
562.50
SgFt
Comments:
52 WEATHERING /RAVELING
L
3,499.97
SgFt
Comments:
48 LONGITUDINAL /TRANSVERSE CRACKING
L
189.05
Ft
Comments:
Packet Page -1304-