BCC Minutes 07/26/1985 S
"
~ ~;-:', '''~~!:~j.'~'.¡;ì~'·<~··
a:I
-
..-.
Naples, Fl~rida, July 25, 1985
'~::"/:," LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that in tlccord<'1ncQ with acti...n takan on Juri.,
~;....y~'~~ " ;- .>/,
':';/'" " 18, 1985, th. lioard ~f County Commiuil)nera in and for the Cl)unty of
'~¡:',,;..,.,\~'
~f:¡ij Collier met in SPBCIAL SESSION on this date at 1:30 P.M. in Building', "
'.1..,~,,'" .,w of the Courthousl) Complex, t:ast Naples, t'lorida, with the foll~'",inq
members present:
CHAIR/'IANI Frltderick J. V.,sa
VICE CHAIRMAN: John A. Pistor
Max A. Hasse
C. C. wRedw Holland
Anne Go.,dnight
ALSO PRESENT, William J. Reagan, Clerk; James C. Giles, Fiscal
Officar; Maureen Kt:nyon, D'Jputy Clerk; Donald B. Lusk, C.,unty Manager;
Ken Cuyler, Assistant C.,unty Attorney; Neil Dorrill, Assistant County
Man3g.H; 1.;)0 Z,;dk~, budget lJir<Jctor; M'Hk Thal!!, Purchasing Direct.,r;
and N"ncy lsraels,)n, Administrative lIssist-'nt t., the B.,ard.
AGENDA
I. Rec.,mm"ndðti.,n on Award ot üid 1839, Asbestos Abatement
II. R"ad Constructi·)n H~venu!s
A. R.,,,d Impa<:t fttes
d. Othe r ouogP.t r ssu.;!s
II!. dUG1get Issues
A. Fair L.tb"r S:;anaards Act
b. Other budget Issues
IV. ....d Valorem '!.')(E!S
A. County-Wide
~. Uninc~rp~[~t~d Areas
C. k~ad Cistricts
D. Im~r.,vem~nt Districtti
E. Fire Control Districts
F. Llynting Districts
G. Aggregate
V. Ad~pt resolution to set tentative millage rates and t~ set public
hearing dat~s for the T~ntative Budget.
RBSOLUTIOM 85-148 RIJICTIMG ALL PROPOSALS POR BID '839, ASBISTOS
ABATIKIIIT, AIID TO WAlYl COMPITITlYl BIDDIIIG - ADOPTID. CONTRACT FOR
ASBESTOS ABATIMDIT POR BUILDIIIGS ·A·, ·C·, AMD ·D- - AWARDID TO W. T.
STEVENS CONSTRUCTION, INC., HOUSTON, TEXAS, IN AMOUNT OP $298,000
~urchðsing Direct.,r Thiele stated that the C.,unty has retained the
aervicl!!i Ot Tom CorL~h, ð c.,nsult3nt with the ~ur\'..v Group, Inc., to
aoOK 0881'A~t 18
Page 1
".'.'",;"'''',\.,~.W'.'''..<.
';;ß!':~'",,"
--'/". ~ .
. ,;~.
--,---_.--~_._._-
101( OB8mt 19 July 26, 1985
prepare specifications for tha asbestos abatement. He stated that only
two bids ~re received and the low bid was 5408,000, adding th~t the
amount that was originally budgeted was $250,000. He stated that the
consultant was ask~d to go back to the low bidder tc renegotiate the
price, adding that after nagotiations it was ,felt that it was still too
high. He statad that the bids could have been lower if one thing 1n
the specifications was addressed, which was insurance. He stated th~t
th~ consultant made Lhe specifications as strict as possible to
guarantee as much protection as possible for the C.,unty with reference
tt) futurE! cll!ims. He state.,] that aftl:'r talking with Risk MJinilClement
with reyórd t., in5ur~nce, it was determincd that the County would be
paying a l.,t m~re and .,ver-insuring themsdlves if an extrð $100,000 was
paid to put thE c.,ntract in force. He stated that based .,n this the
other vena.,rs that hbO picked up specificati.,ns, but did n"t bid, were
~ontacted to quot~ with thd chang~ in the insurance item. He stated
that B yu.,tes "'cre then received wnich were less than the $393,000
which was the original l~w bidder. He stated that in "rder t., s~ve
$100,000 ne Wl)uld like a resoluti.,n appr.,ved that w,,~ld r~ject the bids
that wcre rcceived and t., w~iv~ tnc competitive bidaing and to direct
staff t., neg"tiðt~ with thr l~w bicdur that is most ~u811f1ed. H&
stated that W. T. ~tevens practically meets everythiQg that was in the
·.,riglnal specificati.,ns and th~ consultant has workeo with h1m in the
~aSt ana there is no problem meeting the tight sched~le for ~uild1r.gs
I
·C· anò "UN.
Ccmm1SS1~ner Go.,anight stateo that sh~ f~€l~ lhac this is the best
w~y to go and will save the C~unty scm~ m.,n~y.
Commifis1on~r Pist.,r stütco that if t~lS hdS to b~ j"n~ legally,
then h~ feels that this is thti best agreem~nt lhat has bðen received.
C.,mmissioncr H~ss.., ,,!uo:!stionl:d if th~r., is any b.,nding thet Wl)uld
inaicate that this ~ill be finished in cimd, t., which Mr. Thiele stated
tn<.t tnt; p'i!r formanct.' b.,r¡a Will De rt.:Cc1VCiJ ill a few Ò,lYS and t~er(: is ð
penalty clause .,t SlUO a aay for cacn adY that they br~ late. He
stated that their pdSt history is cxc~ll~nt.
Commissiontr Holl~nd stat~d that he feo:ls that a pen~lty of $100 a
day 15 to~ small for ð job this size, adc1ng that hQ f~cls that it
Wl)uld be wi~~ to increase thd penalty clause in ora~r t., assure that
the job is o.,n~ on time.
Purchasing Dir~cccr Thid!v stat~o tnat if thd penalty clause is
changed, tn~ contractor would h~ve t., be given the opportunity to
Pag" 2
-
!!!!!
I!!I!I
"
.~,~~ ..~~~:i:¿Si[:~~~'tl·~~~:;~.~~fl,¡;,*,""-~!5~:,,:'':::~7;7~:·:r::_~ ':·_,'~:·~::·;.f~"~~" ,'~
;";'.' ..
'-"-'."'"""f
--
IIiiI
r==
Julï 25, l~ß~
decide if they will h~n"r the same proposal.
Commis.i~ner V~ss stated that it c~ula Þe left that Mr. Thiele
c~uld negotiate for a hiqher penalty clause, adding that it will
undoubtedly c"st the C~unty m~re.
purchasing D1rectcr Thiele stated th~t there is ~nly a matter ,,£ a
few days that everythIng has to be cleaned anó then there is a f.w days
for the actual abdtement. He statud that at this p~lnt there is a
peri~d of aÞouL 4 days where the dust has t., settle so that they can d~
t~~ting und then if the testing d~os n~t show right, tney h~ve tc all~w
a c.,uple of days t" g~ back and reclp~n. He statea that their past
~crformance sh~ws thut thay can d., the work, adding that he r~c.,mmenós
that the C~unty not je.,pardize the situation.
t:~mmi ssi.,ner fjo')ll.:!nd stated th¿t he W':)uld lil<e t., have so')mo
preview "f tnpse matters before they go this far, because n.,w it is too
late t" do anything if the time schedule is t., be met.
C.,mmissi.,ner Voss st~ted that in the future specifications c~uld
b~ made aVdil~blp t" the C.,mmissi.,nors.
Commissioner Hasse .oved, seconded by Commissioner Pistor and
carried unanimously, that Resolution 85-148 rejecting all proposals
received tor Bid '839, Asbestos Abatement, and to waive competitive
bidding, be adopted.
Co..issioner Hasse ~Yed, seconded by Commissioner Pi.tor and
carried unani.ously, that a contract for asbestos abate.ent for
Buildings wAw, ·Cw, and ·DW be awarded to W. T. Støvens Construction,
Inc., Houston, Texas, in the a.ount of $298,000, that the Chair.an be
authorized to execute said contract; that all agencies be directed l~
fully cooperate in adhering to scheduling of work in August and
Septe.ber; and that the riscal Officer be dlrectod to proce.s the
necessary budget amendments.
'00( 088 par.t 20
','i: .-..,,"__'_ - .. ~ . --_ .."'-'.
..:.'.....:.:i..:r.ü~":l,. :-"'\(.
,"_:~:...~,,'.
,"
page 3
-
-
aa
July 26, 193!>
RESOLUTIOW 85-149 ADVISIWG PROPERTY APPRAISER or PROPOSED TENTATIVE
MILLAGE RATES AND DATE, TIME AND PLACB or PUBLIC HEARINGS - ADOPTED
Cemmissioner VQSS questl.,ned why r"ad imp~ct fee& 15 ~n the
dgend~, ddding that this special me~tinq w~~ "nly t~r ad vðl~rr.m taxes.
dudget Director zalka stated that the ~CC requested a discussion
of impact faes before setting tha ad vðl~rem rates.
Commissioner V.,ss stated that there has been a majority and ð
mln~rity report, a~dinq th~t th~ majari~y repQrt ~f the Infrastructure
Cemmittee showed that 71 .,f the annual incr~ase in the assessed
valu3tl.,n was ou~ to n~w <:~n&lructIon ~nd .,n th,t b~8I8 the impnct fee
was calculated te b~ ~265 per unIt which w.,uld pr.,duce $11,400,000 of
revenue OYdr the ndxt ten years. H~ stated that the minority rep.,rt
calculat~s that tilt! impact fae w.,uld be $771 per unit and WQuld producn
better thJn ~l7,OOO,U00 over the n~xt ten yp.~rs. He stated that the
dctlllll incredse 1n ttH! ðsso.>ssed valullti.,n over the past two years has
oeen about :'i, not 7'0, ðdûlnq thðt if tha on is us~d insteaa "f the 7\,
the impact f~~ woulù be Increased t., S3~2 per unit which w.,uld pr.,duce
a little .,Vdr flS,00J,GUU In cnt! n~xt tun YddrS. he Rtated th"t befQre
IIny action is t~~dn "n the rOdd I~pllct f~es, a better 10"k sh.,uld be
ti1K<:!n .:at; the rl<p')rt5 'lne ·.nat. they "re b.Js<.Jo o:¡n.
3uoget Dir~ctor Zalkð stðt~d that th~ tentative budget ò.,es comply
with tne Inten: or the r~c0m~~naations .,1 tn~t committee, bflcause their
røc"mmendatl,)n was to levy ~ series of tilX~5 that w')uld provide an
aOditiondl $~,OOD,00U on an avpraqe per y~ar, adalng that within the
first year it would O~ ab"ut $3,500,UOO. She note1 that the tentative
buoq~t a.,as ~rovide SJ,J5U,UOU more for r03d c.,nstruction dnd it d.,es
It i.)y recognIzing :>l,OUO,Oou fr"m r.,ad impact fees, $1,054,00U from the
nltlo local .,pt1o~n filth I'nd 31xtn c':!nt qðS tolX, ana ðnr:>thfH $1,300,000
from increased revenuus o:¡n t;xistlnq qas taxes ana other revenue sources
th~t IS used for road c.,nStructlon.
C~mmissi.,ner Pistor staleò that all these figures are based on
assumption ùnd they ard unkn"wn fact.,rs, adding that he is skeptical
ab~ut including a certain am"unt in the buaqet '",hen it is n.,t kn¢wn how
much it will be or if these impact fees will be approved.
a'~qet DIrectQr Zalka stdted that the revenue frem these sources
15 ~ppropriated in ! reserve for capital ~utldY, adding that if these
taxes ara not l.vied, it Wt:Iuld be reduced for futur,; t:apital "utlay.
Com~lss1~n~r ~iGt"r indicated that the C.,unty is n"t in ! good
positl.,n t., be meJdlinq wlLn the r.._rvw fer capital .,utlay when thesa
aoO( 088 PA't 22
Pac¡ Q 4
'-'~'1 ~~<~,': '~~~J~~'~~"~:,~~~
~"-'·~;';\{~~I.'";' ~"',t'·,·:'~
·* 088 ""t 23
July 26, 1985
,..:
roads have to be built.
~udget Direct~r Zðlka stateò that if these are t~ b. added, it
would increase the tAX increase by 5\ on a million dollars.
Commis.ioner Pistl)r stated that this is on the t~ntativ8 tax
increase, adding that after all the amounts have been leeked at, the
money may be abl~ t~ be found in another place, ~r wait until the
impact fee and the fifth and sixth cent tax have been passed and are a
ruli ty.
C.,unty Manager Lusk stated that if the ad valorem tax is added on
too, it will increase the options in ~eptember te decide whether the
tax will b~ ad valor~m or impact. He stated that if the Commission i5
willIng to advertise a higher rate then this could bp. dl)ne.
Budget Director Zalka stated that she would n"t rec.:¡mmend
advertising a rAte higher than IBt. She stated that if this tax is
added to the ad val.,rum tðX, it would increase it t., 23%.
Commissioner Voss stated one way or anether the roads have to be
built, and the money will have to ceme from either gas tax, impact fea,
or ad valorem taxus.
Commlssi.,nt;r G"oanlght stat~d that any maj.,r daveloper that has a
PUD or a DIU is pDying tlu'ir fair snart! f.,r the road!>, addil.q thbt tht'
small c.,:)tract.,r is not 00il1':/ it and the r"dO impðct, fo:c ....ould tak'<!
care of that t., m~ke sure that cv~ry.,ne pays their f~ir share.
1
Commissioner H0l1dna ~tatt!a thùt ht! is "pp.,sed to iMp~ct fees,
I
adding that when a home i~ built it is put en the tax roll and
,
connoitcti.,n fees nav" t" be palo, addlng th/lt tr.cre ii'S a big exp"'lIso:! te
start with. Commissioner holiand questioned if it is legal to pUt this
money on the ad val"rem tûX bill "r en r040 c"nstructi.,:) .,r
maint~nanct:1 He questioned if there is a limlt as t., ....hÐt the C.,unty
can d.,?
AssIstant County Att0rn~y Cuylcr st~ted that the C"unty has the
option of includlng this feu lnt., th~ tentative millage at this point
wlth rcgard t., r.,aa lmpûct te~s or ao vblerem tðXUS.
Commisslon~r Holland stated that the fifth and sixth cent optional
gas tax 15 t., ~" tor n~. c.,nstructi.,n.
Commissioncr Voss stated that Mr. Archlbðld indicated to him that
th~ Inst regulation regarding this m.,ney 15 th,t it can be used for
roads, wnether it is (or new c.,nstruction or roao mAintenance.
'tronsportèltl'):) lJi rect.,r Archib..ld stated thèlt e.ll the g1ls tax
'~~ll~ing the optional gas tax, can be used for transportatiQn pur?Oses
Page 5
-
!!Pj
..
. ,:,.'..r:-r..,' ~. .\\~~~.;
.: ~).
~'.'-~:>;¡;-Jr~~"'!!-.~Io:~':'~ .. ,,,,,,,,,~,,,"1:"':;--:~ê- .
~~-, ''''',¡,''''''t"" "·;::a>~1.',.,,,;:~' ......~. " _ ~'~.¡' ~_, :..d'¡:¡¡ii."?~)I_,.:,l~~,~:'~;
,,- " .". ',' '~'.' ......_,.... ., ..,..... . tt~;;.."r.::,..,...,:..." ......_~~...'OV', "',
-
..
c::I
July 26, 1985
which allows the C.,unty te use the revenues for ~any transportation
nlteds.
In 3nswer tl) Cemmissi.,ner Holland, Mr. Archibald indicat~d that
the County receIves 8¢ in t.xes on a qall,n I)f gasoline. Cemmissioner
Holland netdd that with the additional 2¢ tax en gas~line, thin should
be enough te handle the maintenance of r~ads.
Mr. Ed Smith st3ted th~t he was very $urprlsed to see this item on
the ag~nda as this meeting ~dS simply to set th.: ad valorem tax rate.
H~ ~tdted tnat thl~ impdct fee affects the c.,nstruction industry which,
is .,nð .,f the principle em~l.,yers of pe.,ple in C.,lller County. He
stateo th~t this is cons ide rea a v~ry seriou8 matt~r, adding th~t this
item should not have been put .,n the agenda without being advertised
properly.
Budget Uir~ctor ¿dlka stdted tn3t with ruferencu t., the Fair L~b~r
btanaards ~~t, tnp. t.:ntùtive buaget "*"uld cover the necessary overtIme
except f"r t~. ~n.:ritt's u~pùrtmp.nt.
D~puty Chief hunter st~ted tnat there 15 tne Guesti.,n ~s te
1o'11"th';!r Lh~ ::in.rlti',. ¡.)t!partm"nt: will be affectea oy tho: F~ir Lab"r
::it3naards hct at all. H~ stated that the .,vertime will C.,St
dpproxifi1dt<!ly $'/ól, COli ùGdl LI')õ'ldl whiCh is odsed "n assuropti.,ns as t.,
ho~ the Act will affect the Sheriff's Dep~rtment. He stated that the
civili~n empIoyeds dnd c.,rrcctlonal officers are aff~cted by ~age and
riour, adding tnat tne ,)nly .,nes that wert? net affected previously were
the certified p.,sitions which c.,nsi~t of invt?stigators and r"ad patrol
people.
Commissioner ~)ss Sl~L~d that th~ l~w enf.,rcement .,fficers are
alr~ady paid 10. over salary, and questi.,ned If the 10\ is recognized
in tht; $76l,U\J07
De¡:;uty Cnief Hunter stdt~d t.h<lt this Is n.,t a pr:>rti"n "f that
figure, adding that this is extr~ ~~ynn~ the original budget. He
stated that the lUt is rec"gniz~d ~s an original salary adjustment th3t
occurred approximately 10 years ag., which was given t~ the certified
pe.,ple. He stated that under the time and a half, he Wl)uld assume that
the lO~ will be absorbea as a true salary adjustment and the time and a
half will be paid.
Commissioner Plator questioned if the 10_ is t., be includ.d as a
40 hour week or d 44 h"ur waek, t., which Deputy Chief riunter stated
that the .,vertime would be paio after 44 h.,urs, if that is ~ssible
accQrdlng to Wage and ~,ur standards.
lODe 088 rAGE 24
Paqe 6
'. ," ~.- ,'~!. .... "" ,: .", .
, ;,~'
':~~~~~r:'::'~,..,
......_~,,--.
lODe
08B,.~ 25
July 26, 196~
Sheriff Hoger.. stilted that in figuring the overtime, the f?ur
hours and the 10\ were taken into c~nsiderati?n. ~~ at~t~d that within
his budget, he WQuld be able t~ handle the firEt four hours, but any
I)vertime after that """uld hðve to be èln extrl! which figures .,ut t.,
approxim~tely $761,000. He .tat~d that if this law passes, this is
basically the amount of m.,n~y that will be needed f.,r the Sheriff's
Department for overtime.
Commissi.,ner Goodnight question6d if the Fair Labor Standards Act
goes thrl)ugh And the Sheriff's Department ia nl)t exempt from it, will
the $761,000 b~ en.,ugh to c"v~r the overtime that is needed, to which
Sheriff R"gers indicated that he h.,pes this w.,uld be en.,ugh.
budg~t lJi rector Za H./I stateo that she WQuld suggest that thE.'
Sheriff be encour"'geu to re( uc-. lilt! amount .,f overtime by the use .,f
the additional d~putles thót havrl be~n budgp.t~d dnd by using deposi-
tions for c"url cases instead .,f having the officers appear in court,
adding thllt UJ'!!rc is also W.lYs I')f reducing the budget through vari.,us
management as~ects. ~he not~d that if this am.,unt is added to the
budget, tht: "veralJ. incr"ðst in the bu~gPt W':Iuld De 21.7\.
C"mmlssi.,ner Pistor 4u~stl?nrlC if there l~ g.,ing ::0 be a problem
with thrl "'Jcrtimrl I"r 1::~1t>, t" ...:11cn e.,unty Manager LUSK statt'd th"t it
is incluoed In ::heir UUG'Jt!t.
County h1nllg~r LUSk stdt"d tr.t\t h'~ t;ó5
answers .,n this m/llter. He stdtcd th/lt ~r.
not been dbl~ t" gtt
el",~, th4r Lab.,r At::ornO;?y
t
.for thl! (;rJunty, wi 11 l)(.: <it tllP (;"urth.)u&~ 1n cJu"ut ù' w~..k but t.here arE
ð l.,t of quëst.ions that n~ h~3 n"t be~n abl!' t., <'Ins",~r .)r.d the
tK!partment .,f Lah.,r nùs nl)t. D~"n aDIt. t., Dnsw",r tneml cithl!r.
!:judge:: L'irector Ül1kê\ stilted thùt sh~ w"ulc: liKe t., discuss the
reserve f.,r conting~ncl~s, adaln~ that th~ ~n~rlff has selo n~ is not
requesting IIny changes in ~is budg~t provicing that the ace is aware of
a p"tenlidl ne..d tor rcs"rvI:. Sn:: stl~t"d tndt sn.. fetdS thdt'. it ....,uIc1
be wise t., l.,.,k at the reserve f.,r contingencies which is included in
t:he to;?ntativt: buoql;t. Stl" st,H'~O tn~t in ¡ðst yt!(H'S aa.,?ted bUdget
tht; rest!rves tor c.,ntlnqpnci~H W]S $1,7~7,OOO and the tentative )u~get
for n&xt YUù( 1S -1,~OU.ouu. ~nt! nl)t..d th.)t s., fðr this y~ar only
about half has been spent, a~ding tnat it is pretty clear that with
Sl,9UU,OOO 1n next y..ar'~ buJgEt, th~re shl)ulc be ð q.,.,è res~rve. ~he
stated that anythlng Iltft over from this year's budget ~,uld b~
aOditi.)nal tor next Yti,1(' 5 buaget and ttldt shO;? WQuld lik'~ t? rt'c.,mmend
that the tlce ¿ d"pt tn.. tcntðtive Idllaqe rate as pr.,p"sed in the
Page 7
-
~
I!I!I!I
,~ . r
'>.~ ~ .,·':::~;~~_:;~.~~~_,;;v;~,-:----,,:~,,~<~:~·_77.;-:-·-->-~"-";-"'~i' '-'~.:
.i~'.,,'" '~" "
t·'"
-
..
==
July 26, 19t 5
t.ntative budget.
Commissioner Pistor stðted th,t if everything is taken into
conaiderötion the C"unty-wide tent~tive taxes ~~ulo heve to be
$26,621,579 which would incIuae thif impact fees and the additional gas
tax. He question~d tne availability of tha money for th~ road
pri~r1t1es.
Trðnsp.,rtðtion Director Archibald stated
shows that there are a l.,t of road priorities
for a nu.lIt,.:r of Yt!dOI dntJ IldV,! bCl<n untunè~d.
thðt thu five year plan
that have been priorities
H~ stated if these roads
öre n.,t built or maintained, the C.,st goes up each year.
Commissioner ~ist.,r st~ted th~t the C.,unty is faced with incruased
dllvelopment and the c"nstructi.,n pe.,plt: a" n.,t want an impact fee but
the roajs h~vc t., be built.
~r. hrchibalc stat~c th~t there is ~ two-f.,ld pr.,blem, ene is to
conti:'\Uc t" .T,aintain it r"Jd nt!t·....,rk that is increasing in the number of
miles dS ~ell ~s Incr~dslnq jn ~q~, ~ddlng th~t at thfl sðme time there
is a road net~)rK t., b3 bUIlt ana the funds have t., be available to
maintain dn Il1crl::,u3in-; r')J,: n~tw"r ( c:nc t., I!xp.tnd the n<!!twork that
exists. H~ st...teo that Ì1e Jetir.itely needs the $3 milli"n. He stated
that he 15 tryin~ t" =.,~e u~ wltn pr"grams that w1l1 pr"vide the road
systv,n and ¡novice it r.,dO n"t'....HK that will keep up with the dt:manès,
!lading tnat the pro~l~ms In 0tn~r C"untle~ ~re fr"m r.,ad pr"grams that
fell benind. he n"teo th~t to =dtch up costs many milli"ns of d.,llars.
Cemmissi<1nt:r H.!sse st,)tO:!d that he would g., -"long with the
percentage that öu~get Director Zalka is proposing or a little more.
C"mmissioner ""llano stðt~d that he does n"t f~el th3t the
tentative bUdget should be incre~sed much, ~dding thðt hd feels th~t
there are cuts tn~t c~n b~ m~C~.
~udg~t Direct"r ¿3lka ~tat~û that t., Include the gas tax .,ption
and the impact fees, the tentative budget would be a 2H.l\ increase
whicn is what W0uld be mailed t" th~ taxpdy~rs.
In answer t., C.,mmissi"ner Pist.,r, ~udget Uirector Zalka stated
that she would su~gest that the $761,000 for the Sheriff's I)vcrtime be
taken frl)m the Heserves fer C"ntingencies and that the Sheriff try to
r*duce tne am"unt of "vQrtim~.
Commissi"ner h<11ldnd questionea if any cash carry forward h~s bden
taken into cons1ddrati.,n, to which Ms. laIka stated that there will be
$3.~ million cash c~rry t"rward '1n the gen1ral func.
fiscal 0fficer Giles stated that each year there Is a discussion
&ooc 088 ,.a~ 26
Page S
. ~ ,'v ;~,~:' -;It:fk~ ~~~:' ,!:~'~,~;~~L',," , ._;~ ,;,~.
., . ,'.,' ;'''J;";' \~} H~;';~.~;¡~i-~6.i..~
... 088'1~ Z7
July 26, 1985
fI':" '., u<¡ardinq contingencies verauS ouh carry forward, adding that what is,
"';>:C.:, ~bein<1 'budgeted is various revenue. plus cash that is available in the
t:~.. ':' 'bank which is the cash carry forward as _11 as continc;encles. He
~';':.', 'stated that a portion of the cash in the bank that, is expected I)n
'Octl)ber 1st, plus revenues that are expected te c.,me in during the
forthcoming year, is being held aside for un~sual circumstances that
may arise which is what is called reserves. He stated that it ia easy
to get it confused with carry fl)rward, adding that it is an
appropriation of carry fl)rward and other revenues.
Cosai..ioner Pistor ~ved, s.conded by Commissioner Goodnight, to
increa.e the t.ntative budget from 18' to 28' maximum.
Co..i..ioner Ha..e .oved to amend the .otion to 25' increa.e.
Motion died for a lack of second.
Cosaissioner Holland .oved, seconded by co..is.ioner Has.e, to
.mend the .otion to reflect a 20' increase. Upon call for the
qu.stion, the .otion failed 2/3, (Com.i.sioner. Goodnight, pistor, and
Voss oppo.ed).
Upon call for the que.tion on the original ~tion, the .otion
carried 3/2, (Co.mis.ioners Holland and Vo.. opposed).
Co..i..ioner Pi.tor .oved, .econd.d by Com.i..loner Goodnight and
c.rried 4/1, (Co.-i.sioner Holland opposed) th.t Re.olution 85-149
advi.ing the Property Apprai.er of the proposed tentative maximum
,
.aill.g. rate. and date, ti.e and place of public hearing. be .dopted
.nd that the SUmaAry of Ad Valorem Millage Rate. .nd; the Summary of \d
Valorem Tax Dollars be .mended to reflect a 28' incr.....
bu~qct Direct.,r Z~lk3 stated thðt sne Wl)uld assum~ tnat th~
Incr~ase will b~ levied in the Capit~: Improvement millage rate, to
,.,r-.1ch tller~ ...."'5 d gf:n~ral consensus.
pag t! 9
-
r!I!
-
"'......
:;~'\.(~'4;'
....,'··,·,·.,..'''«_'''''''''...;O':~t
~. , ':~?~'::i:~:;f\~#~i(;;.1~·~::r~;~~f¡:_~~·
..---..,._'",''''~'' .,.,.."-,~,"","......"..,,.,_.-,-
:(~
,'. ':,~,t~~
.,~:'t~
~:;'a·~'·:"·~.'·:·'··
,~.,.¡, . .
,> 'to
'~u:.'~~
":~4J~
'",;2
,:,;,~,,:;t
, ·".,.rylf
:~:I!"
"t~;.,
.',.'... ..~..
'~\.{' . II' .. .
11)·... ".' ,
~,~;"";;~ ':,
~~:;"DDC 08BrAcI: 35 July 26, 19115
~~. . * . *
~?:",-el" ~'.,
~'_" Thertl beipq nl) further business f,)r the Qr)r)Q of the County, the
~~\. muting was ÐdJ/Surned by Ordar of th& Cn31r - 'l'1mez 3100 P.M.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSI
~OARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF
SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS
CONTROL
,.:tt {! If! VOs.. CHAI."^'
ATTEST:
, W ILLIM1 J. Rt.:AGAN, CLI::RI:
";Z¿'lJA' .-
,'iIJ. ", --,.
4i.~.' ('...- ~ .1""1
.:. . ,:,~""",~4-' - ey.C
. \' \ \. \. 't/. ,.
!h~~f n;i'nute! aÞpr.,vt:d by the ~CC on ~/.J, /?'.5-
-::', ,I'..1.~J'" ~
a~~~~ ~t!d,~'~~ or ~s c.,rrected
., .... ,- ,
, ,to - .
, " ",
I ~ M : J ~." '
IÌIIÏII
œm
,.,~~ ,,' , "~'~;,.;~,,,:,,-;:;,,;~~~ æ;-{~~~' ., "
to"'-, ."..,..,..,.,,-.J ,'~''''_': '.,....,"'«>.~..-,...,~~,~ ,""'. "r!!, ,!~ ~ '/} .\..,.,,1. .4rJt:,·....._~"1'r.·~...,,'~;..1'!·
..... "-:.'·"··f. '.......'..·.'I'_..'''....·~.;:·:..~.f!i.
I!!!!i
'.
"896 10
______>'.__,.~..L .,. _, _ .....,"_~.~...,'...'~,~.__.~~...~",......,._."