BCC Minutes 09/17/1985 R
. , ,!.----<:L'.' ~. . '-. j ....-. "'.""""'\1' · .~..m.. : '-'!- ,-.'. '. . '11
~ .,--_..,-"."'._"......_-->.,..~~..._-<.~.,..,,;.,...,"',_....
_ __."_111.""'___'_"_ .,...... ,u"n. __",-"-.""~.,""",..,,,,,.,,,"'"'_''''''.''''_
"'''''''''''-''''',--..-
œ;;a
~
,~,.:
September 17, 1985
14
'~ PI'I'ITIOII MP-85-Je, KAIUC LJI.MOURIUX, P.I., RIPRISDTIIIG DAVID PITIRSOII,
RI SUBDIVISIOM KASTER PLAM APPROVAL POR MAPLES BUSIMISS PARK ON M.I.
COIUIU OP RADIO ROAD AXD IIIDUSTRIAL BLVD. - APPROVED, SUBJECT TO
STIPULATIONS, PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT ACCEPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
September 1, 1985, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition SMP-85-3C,
filed by Mark Lamoureux, P.E., representing David Peterson, requesting
Subdivision Master Plan approval for Nðples Business Park on the
northeaat corner of Radio Road and Industrial BQulevard.
Planner McKim said the objective of this petition is to subdiviðe
the existing parcel into 36 lots in cQnformance with the exl~tin9
zoning which is Industrial. She said the property is located in
Section 36, T49S, R25E and contains 38.2 acres. She explained Staff
and all appropriate CQunty agencies reviewed this petition and recom-
mend approval subject to the stipulations Qutlined in the Executive
Summary dated 9/11/85. She said the CAPC held their public hearing on
9/5/85, and recommended approval subject to Staff stipulations. She
explained that Staff requests that the Utilities Division stipulations,
é.S contained in their memo dated 6/6/85, be included in the recommenda-
tion to the Board of County Commissioners as they were inadvertently
ondtted.
Mrs. McKim said, since the CAPC meeting, the p 'Itioner has
requested that the western most road within the Mas', ~lan be Øloved
west 45 feet. She said ~taff has no problem with this minor change,
adding all lots would still me.t the zoning standards and the config-
uration or character of the Master Plan would not be changed. She said
Staff recommends approval subject to Staff stipulations, including the
Utility stipulations and the minor change of moving the western road 45
feet to the west.
Commissioner Voss referred to Page 9 of the Executive Summary and
the two sentences that state all water and sewer facilities constructed
on private property and not required by the County to be located within
utility easements shall be owned, oper~ted and maintained by the
Developer, his assigns or successors; and upon completion of construc-
tion of the water and sewer facilities within the project, the facili-
ties will be tested to insure they meet Colier County's minimum
requirements at which time they will b. conveyed or transferred to the
County, when required by the Utilities Division. He said it seemed to
aOOK 089 w,l!97
page 4
-,~.""",.-",-",-,.,,,,,",,._,,,,,,,,-,,,,,,,."------,,,".., .,..---
'OOK 08'9 P1(,r 199
hi. in one place Staff ia saying that
remain ,private and in another part ia
conveyed to the County.
Utl11tiu Admi',\llht,.;,tor Crandall said that the language about the
~;":'. facllitiu being conveyed to the County is improper and ahould be
",.', 'changed. He aaid Staff does not intend that the County own the systems
in areas that are not within rights-of-way or in areas where the County
needs dedicated easements, such as service lines into houses and
businesses. He said Staff will correct that language.
In response to Commissioner Holland, Mr. Crandall said the main
lines are part of an overall major system to which the County will
ultimately tie. He said the County would own any lines that come off
Radio Road that would be tied to Industrial Boulevard. He said if
those lines are not required for a loop or are not needed as part .f
the master system the County does not want to own them. He said the
major lines will be owned by the County and the Developer will pay
connection fees for each individual unit. ~
Mr. Lamoureux, representing the petitioner, explained the entire
38.2 acres are owned by the petitioner and all the lots to which sewer
service w111 bø provided are owned by the petitioner. Responding to
Commissioner Holland, Mr. Lamoureux explained the dark blue line on the
posted map represents the proposed street the developer is constructing
to serve the 36 lots and the lots are numbered on either side of the
proposed road.
September 17, 1985
part of the facilities are to
~aylng all facilities are to be
Commissioner Holland asked how muc~ front footage the petitioner
has on Radio Hoad and Mr. Lamoureux answered 1313 feet. He brought a
map forward and indicated the entrance to the project off Radio Road,
the interior loop street with lots on either side, and an exit to
Industrial Boulevard.
Commissioner Holland said he had a problem with this petition
because there i3 only one entrance and one exit to the pr?ject. He
said in an industrial development like this the traffic count will be
high and major congestion will be caused at the entrance. He said
there have been traffic problems in this area in the past.
Mr. Lamoureux said the owner int~nds to begin marketing this
project as industrial lots as soon as the design plans are completed,
adding he is presently working on a Subdivison Plat based on the Board
of County Commissioners' approval, ~his date.
Public WOrks Administrator Kuck referred to Staff Stipulation -D-
Page 5
~4'~
~
~
-
..' ~ .,.. ... .' '.,.- ,'.
-
-
~
September 17, 1985
which requires the developer to provide a fair share contribution
toward the capital costs of traffic signals on Radio Road at Industrial
Boulevard and at the project entrance when deemed warranted by the
County Engineer. Commissioner Holland said if the developer wants to
compound a hazard already present he should install the lights.
Mr. Lamoureux said the developer would be happy to have more than
one entrance on Radio Road and on Industrial Boulevard.
Commissioner Hasse expressed his opinion that the less access and
exits there are to a thoroughfare the better it is. Mr. Lamoureux said
the signalization of the area will be at the discretion of the County
with regard to the condition of Industrial B~ulevard and the volume of
traffic east and west on Radio Road.
Mr. Lamoureux said he had a problem with the one access ~ltuation
off Industrial B~ulevard which Staff recommended and to which the owner
agreed to expedite the petition. He said Industrial Boulevard exists
as ~n easement and the condition of the road is such that it cannot be
classified as a collector street. He explained when the plan was
devised the developer proposed individual access to each of the six
lots off Industrial Boulevard and Staff determined that this road may
be a collector street, in the future. He said the developer was told
because Industrial Boulevard is a collector street he would only be
allowed one access point to which the developer disagreed because it
may not be a colle~~or street in tn~ fùture and the project should not
be designed for something that may occur in the future.
~sistant County Manager Dorrill said there is a proposed asses-
ment project in the area under discussion and he hoped the County would
always approve developments with an eye toward the future as it relates
to roads and access points on the main thoroughfare.
Mr. Kuck said this project is included in the Naples production
Park and if that assessment project proceeds Industrial BQulevard will
be a main collector street. He said Staff objects to having individual
entrances '':11;0 Rd:1io Road because they create traffic hazards.
Commissioner Holland asked if the rear of every business on the
outside perimeter of the project will face the road and Mr. Lamoureux
answered affirmatively.
Tape '2
Mrs. McKim said each business will be considered to have two front
yards and setback requirements will have to be met on each end.
Mr. Kuck said Radio Road, within the next three to five years,
~o'~~ 08D mt 199
pag e 6
~"".~,.-".",,,,.,,,,,,,~.,.,",,-..,..,, '''''-''^"~"~."",..".".,,,,,.,.,,,_.;,,..~.,,,,,....,.,~, '"""~"---"-""._-"",,,_., .... ~ ..._""__,~..,,>"',..;O.!,~"..,_~-........___._
-
-
~
September 17, 1985
:~.,iIt.. 15
~~\'~ct:
·¡ò\';"..~·~·'PI'I'I'I'IOII Y-85-22C, ROIl DI PLAVIS RI VARIAllCI PROM MIMIMUM LOT SIZI
'it ·':"'RIQUIRPtDT OP RMI'-12 DISTRICT - CONTINUED TO 9/H/SS
co..iaaloner Ba... aov.d, .econded by co..la.loner Goodnight and
·carrl.d 4/0, that PetitlQn V-SS-22C, Ron De Plavl., be continued to
'/24/85, at Petitioner'. reque.t.
ne. U
RISOLUTIOM 85-192 RI PETITIO. V-8S-23C, DAVID J. PRUETIR, RIPRISEMTING
SUPIRX FOOD , DaUU al VARIANCE PROM REQUIRED MUM81R O' PARKING SPACES
IN A SHOPPING CENTER ON THE lAST SIDE OP US-41 - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been pUblished in the Naples Daily News on
September 1, 1985, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-85-23C,
filed by David J. pru.eter, representing SuperX Food' Drug, requesting
a variance from the required number of parking spaces in a shopping
center ~n the east side of U.S. 41 approximately 1/2 mile S.E. of
Airport Road.
Planner McKim explained the objective of this petition is to
construct an addition to an existing supermarket for property located
in Section 13, TSOS, R25E. She said the property is zoned C-3,
contains 4.24 acres, and is located at the south end cf the Naples Town
Centre and she indicated its location on a posted site plan. She said
when Naples Towne Centre opened in 1982 with 775 parking spaces
provided, the parking requirement, at that time, was fulfilled. She
.aid the required number of parking spaces for both supermarkets and
shopping centers has been increased since 1982 and Naples Towne Centre
is a legal non-conforØling situ~tion as far as the parking spaces
provided. She explained any new construction must comply with current
regulations and the proposed 5,760 square foot addition would neces-
sitate an additional 46 parking spaces for a total of 821 for the
entire shopping center. She said the petitioner is requesting a
variance to allow the expansion of the SuperX supermarket without
provi~ing any additional parking spaces. She said the shopping center
will be expanded with the restaurant currently under construction and
the expansion under discussion. She said Staff does not find a
hardship and recommends denial of this request.
Mr. Daivd J. Prueter, Real Estate Manager representing the peti-
tioner, explained this request stems from the fact that consumer
research has indicated that shortcomings for the SuperX supermarket is
&OOK 089 ·J'.f 201
Page 8
. -. .~... ~~ f.- ..
.",,--, ....,"'.-------..,....""-
aDDIC Q89 p~r.t202 .
September 17, 1985
;" that there 18 not sufficient product variety in the store and, in order
to remedy the situation, expansion of the store is necessary. He said
· 40'x 144' addition is proposed to the ri9ht of the store and the
service drive would be relocated to the right of the expanded area. He
.aid there are 213 parkin9 space. in the parking lot area owned by
SuperX and studies done by the petitioner indicate that approximately
60\ to 70\ of the parking spaces are currently being used. He said
when the store is expanded the petitioner does not expect to increase
customer traffic because tradition says when a store is expanded the
ftame trade area currently bein9 served is retained but more product is
available to be purchased by the customers which is how the cost of the
expansion is justified. He said this store is open twenty-four hours a
day which spreads the business over a greater period of ~ime and there
are ten check-out stations which expedite moving the customers in and
out of the store more quickly. He said wben these facts are considered
it would be an undue hardship if the petitioner was not allo~ed to
expand the store to provide the customer with a better facility.
Commissioner Voss said if parking becomes insufficient the store
would lose customers and the situation would take care of itself.
Responding to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Prueter said with the
petitioner's recent acquisition of the Sunshine Stores there are other
facilities more r.onvenient for people to shop and there would be no
reason for those people now shopping outside the so-called trade area
of this SuperX to drive the longer distance past a more convenient
SuperX/Sunshine stor~ to shop at this facility and, therefore, he did
not think there will be a substantial increase in the customer traffic
at this store.
Co..i..ioner Haa.e ~Yed, .econded by Co..i..ioner Goodnight and
c.rried 4/0, that the public hearing be clo.ed.
Co..i..ioner H.... ..id he did not .ee any p.rticular hard.hip for
this petition to .et a.ide the County parking requirement. and he .oved
to deny Petition V-85-23C. The aotion died for lack of . .econd.
Coaai..ioner Coodnight .oved, .econded by Coaais.ioner Holland and
carried 3/1, Co..i..ioner Ha..e oppo..d, that Resolution 85-192 r.
Petition V-85-23C, David J. pruet.r, be adopted.
Page 9
~,ï;£J
~
~
--,
AA Iu..; I(I(I!: 08·9p~r.t206
:f,'",;"?'.~" .'., ;'
.~.J.d~{,.\-¡~ EllDORSIKDT OP ADVAJlCm RICõBT-Or-NAY ACQUISITION AIID PUTURI RICõBT-or-
'!$.~:'.,~, NAY PROCEDURE STRATEGUS - APPROVED
~~~,:::,' MPO Director Perry explained, aa a result of recent legislative
~<;' action, the State of Florida and the counties and municipalities can
,J~""";" participate in the advanced right-of-way acquisition procedure. and can
obtain, through powera of eminent domain, right-of-way for future
roadway construction prior to the preparation or completion of specific
plana for those roadways. He said in order to take advantage of
advanced right-of-way acquisition procedurea the State and County must
include corridors within the Florida Transportation Plan that is cur-
rently being developed, which are areas that have been determined by
planning processes to be area. where new faciities would be put or
where expansion of existing roadways would take place. He s~ld the
State and regional corridors will be reviewed and approved by the State
DOT and the Regional Planning Council and.local agencies can include in
the Florida Transportation Plan local corridors of the County roads
which may be expanded and take advantage of advanced acquisition of
right-of-way. He said in order to do this the County must show that
Collier County will be in the position to protect those rights-of-way
from development encroachment through setback procedures, dedications
and reservations. He explained Staff has taken the position that it is
in the best interest of the County to pursue those types of regulations
and ordinances and has sent to the DOT an indication that it is Collier
County's intent to develop those strategies. He said Staff requests
the Board of County Commisr.ioners to confirm this action and endorse
the advanced right-of-way acquisition procedures outlined in the State
Florida Transporation Plan.
Co..i..ioner Holland aoved, .econded
carried 4/0, that endorse.ent of advanced
future right-of-way protection atrategie.
September 17, 1985
Ite. '8
STAPF DIRECTED TO PREPARE A RESOLUTIOM POR ace ACTION OM 10/1/85 RE A
MORATORIUM IN IMMOKALEE ON ENFORCEMENT or CERTAIN VIOLATIONS
by eo..i..ioner Goodnight and
right-of-way acqui.ition and
be approved.
Planner McKim explained the objective of this item is to place a
moratorium on zoning enforcement in Immokalee of certain zoning regula-
tions due to the pending Master Plan of Immokalee. She said, over the
past several years, various problems have been identified in relation
to the requirement of the Zoning Ordinance and in the specific zoning
Page IO
~
fiÆiJ
~
<~'""""""'«-'--
"'_..._-~..-.,~.<~
"_.--*--~
....,-~.....,.,"-...~._"'..,'"'""...._"',....~,_."." -~"'-""-"'''''-'''''''''''''''-'' '",.-,
~
-
c:::1
September 17, 1985
of certain areas within Immokalee. She said these problema resulted in
zoning violations and non-conforming uses creating, in some cases,
undue hardships on the residents. She said, because of this, Staff
will prepare a Master Plan of Immokalee beginning in October 1985 and
finishing in October 1986. She said once the Plan is complete Staff
wil present tc the Board of County Commissioners rezoning of Immokalee
to comply with the findings of the Master Plan.
Mrs. McKim said until the rezoning is completed the Board directed
Staff to identify the sections of the Zoning Ordinance which may change
and the areas in Immokalee which may be rezoned as a result of the
Immokalee Master Plan. She said violations of these regulations which
may change as a result of the Master Plan would not bt dnforced during
this moratorium. She said the moratorium would be lifted when the
study and the zoning are completed and any violations th~t still exist,
under the new zoning for Immokalee, would be enforced.
Mrs. McKim explained Staff reviewed the violations for April, May
and June, 1985, and plotted them on zoning maps and found the majority
of zoning violations in Immokalee fell under the category of abandoned
vehicles and illegal parking of vehicles. She referred to Zoning
Investigation Reports, Exhibit -A", in the Executive Summary dated
9/12/85. She said abandoned vehicles include vehicles with an expired
license tag or no tag, and junk vehicles or vehicle parts, adding
Section 8.8 of the Zoning Ordinance regulates parking and storage of
these vehicles and r~quires that any vehicle parked in a residential
area have a current tag. She said Staff does not think this regulation
will change as a result of the#Master Plan. She said illegal parking
includes parking in the right-of-way and parking commercial vehicles or
equipment in residontial areas. She said residentia: areas refer tQ
RSF-l through RSF-S, RMF-6, RMF-12, RMF-l5, RT, MHRP and MHSD. She
said it does not include the VR, Village Residential District, and that
Exhibit "B" shows the existing VR District where commercial vehicles
may be parked at a home. She said Section 8.Sl of the Zoning Ordinance
regulates the parking of commercial vehicles and equipment in resi-
dential areas and Staff does not think that reg~lations governing
parking in the right-of-way will change due to the Master Plan. She
said Staff does think that parking of commercial vehicles and equipment
in residential areas may be changed in certain areas of Immokalee as a
result of the Master Plan because of their Rpecial needs in relation to
the farming community of Immokalee. She said Staff is considering that
&OOK 08'9 m! 207
Page 11
lOOK 089PJr,t208 September 17, 1985
an Overlay District may b. appropriate for the areas where commercial
.v.hiclea ahoulð be allowed tob. parked which would not affect eny
exi.ting zoning in the rest of the County.
", ,'. Mra. McKim .xplained the violations plotted on the zoning maps
. . ",>...
'sho~d 'they we~e concentrated in the RMF-6, MHSD and MHRP Districts.
She referred to Exhibit ·C· which showed the RMF-6 Districts and
Exhibit "D" which showed the HHSD and MHRP Districts. She uid Staff
recommends that a moratorium b. placed on parking commercial vehicles
and equpment in those areas in which there is a heavy concentration of
violations as listed above. She said this would mean that in areas
where commercial vehicles are now allowed to be parked vehicles would
not be cited for violations if a moratorium were in place for those
areas indicated on Exhibits "C" and "D".
Mrs. McKim said Staff used its familiarity with certain areas in
Immokalee in which problems have arisen in the past as well as the
location of actual use violations. She said Exhibit "E" indicated
tho.e areas in which there have been or ape problems with a large
number of illegal or non-conforming uses. She said Staff recommends a
moratorium be placed to defer any enforcement of such existing non-
conforming uses in these areas until the Master Plan is complete and
the subsequent rezoning has been accomplished.
Mrs. McKim said said Staff'. recommendations are only Staff's best
estimate of issues to be addressed by the Master Plan and if the Master
Plan and subsequent rezoning do not legalize these situations and they
are still violations after the rezoning of Immokalee, they shall be
subject to enforcement once the moratorium is lifted.
Mrs. McKim said, if the Board wishes to place a moratorium on
enforcement of violations only, Staff recommends that the moratorium be
placed until October 1, 1986 on p~rking commercial vehicle. and equip-
ment in the RM¥-6, MHSD, and MHRP Districts in Immokalee and principal
and accessory use violations in the areas of Immokalee as shown on
Exhibit "E" and that a~y new construction will have to comply with the
existin" Zoning Ordinance.
Commissioner Goodnight said she thought this plan would help
alleviate some of the problems that currently exist in Immokalee.
Commissioner Holland said he did not see how the Board of County
Commissioners can have two sets of standards for the County, adding
when Commissioner Goodnight asked for a moratorium on trucks, recently,
he could under~tand that. He said there was criticism about this,
Page 12
IlI.F'· J
~
~
..""_....,....__.~_,._1>'"
-
-
c::J
September 17, 1985
however, becausQ there ara people in East Naples and Golden Gate who
have been cited for violation on weekends for taking home the same type
of vehicles thay use for work. He said he thought this plan would
create a lot of problems.
Mrs. McKim said one idea Staff has to give Immokalee residents an
option to address the unique needs for that area is the Overlay
District. She said there presently is a Mobile Home Overlay and an
·ST" Overlay which apply to the entire County, adding those were in
place in 1982 when the rezoning was done. She said if anyone wishes to
have thesv Overlay Districts placed on his property there are require-
ments that must be met. She said a Commercial Vehicle Overlay could be
placed on certain areas that seemed appropriate in Immokalee as a
resul t of the Ma ster Plan and for other areas where peor') wllnt that
Overlay they could petition the Board of County Commissioners for it.
Tape '3
Commissioner Goodnight said if the County is going to try make
Immokalee a community where people will want to move, Staff is going to
have to find out what problems exist and address them. She referred to
Exhibit "E" and asked Mrs. McKim to indicate the Lake Trafford Farms
are/! which is zoned MobIle lIome. She sllid until March 1985 there were
mobile homes and houses that were allowed to be moved there or built
with one house or mobile home per five acres. She said Staff gave
Habitat for Humanity permits to build 10 or 15 houses on five or six
acres of land. She said there is a person who wants to put two mobile
homes on five acres of lLnd and Staff has told him he cannot do that
and he has pointed out to her that Staff allow~d Habitat for Humanity
to do something he is being denied. She said there are some inconsis-
tencies in Immokalee and until it is zoned the way it should be there
will be problems. She asked Mrs. McKim to indicate the area zoned C-4.
Commissioner Goodnight said when Staff rczoned Immokalee in 1982 they
did not look at what was in Immokalee to see if the zoning was consis-
tent with the buildings that were there. She described three busi-
nesses that exist in the area zoned C-4 which is illegal for that
zoning. She said these businesses are continually red-tllgged because
of articles they have in their yards that are supposed to be behind the
buildings. She described II situation where a person hils a tin shed for
a garage and c~nnot build the new building he wants to build because of
the zoning. She said she was only requesting, until the Master Plan
can be completed and the rezoni~g can be done, that the people not be
~OO( 089 PM,! 20,9
Page 13
'00« 08'9Plr.t210 September 17, 1985
continually harassed.
Mi.. McKim said that Lake Trafford Farms is a result of parting of
property where most of the '.)ts are 1, 1-1/2 and 1-3/4 acres that were
divided when that size was legal so they are legal non-conforming Iota
under A-2 zoning. She said there are only a few five acre parcels and
Staff is considering that the five acre minimum may not be the appro-
priate zoning for this area because there are so many non-conforming
lots there and that a new zoning category may need to be developed for
that .,rea.
Responding to Commissioner Hasse, Mrs. McKim said it is necessary
to look at each area and the uses of that area and that the Master Plan
will identify what use is appropriate in tho ,,clOd c:lnd what size lots
are appropriate, adding this has not been done for Immokalee which is
why Staff feels the Master Plan is so important.
Commissioner Voss said Staff is requesting a moratorium so they
can develop a workable plan. ~
In response to Commissioner Holland, Mrs. McKim said St"tff finds
more inconsistencies in Immokalee than in the remainder of the County.
Commissioner Holland said he was in favor of helping the situation in
Immokalee but he did not see how this could be done in one area of the
County and not in the entire County.
Mr. Mike Zewalk, representing the North Naples Civic Association,
spoke in opposition to a moratorium in one area of the County where
people could violate existing laws for an entire year.
Mr. George Keller suggested that a morc:ltorium be specifically
stat~d on existing violations so people are not encouraged to violate
the law during the year.
Planning/Zoning Director Pettrow said as soon as the Immokalee
Master Plan is completed Staff is required to review the Comprehensive
Plan and find the deficiencies in it. He said when the Zoning
Ordinance was amended in Immokalee in 1981 the necessary zoning changes
were not made and the Master plan should remedy this. He said there
are other areas in the County that need to have problems addressed,
also, and Staff will proceed with those situations when the Immokalee
Master Plan is finished.
County Attorney Saunders sU9gesteà that a resolution number be
reserved for this item and, if a moratorium is imposed, the resolution
should be drafted to reflect exactly what the moratorium is being
imposed on.
Page 14
ŒJ
~\"
~
&c'~~:'l
'.fI'·" ..'
", .
IWII
aI
:=.'J
September 17, 1985
A discussion followed during which Commissioner Holland asked if a
man takes a truck out of the area and brings it back in would he be
subject to red tagging? He said there was no way Staff can watch the
trailers in the rental parks to m~ke sure one person does not move out
and another move in.
Commissioner Goodnight said there is only one area where trailers
are concerned on Lake Trafford and she agreed there is no way Staff can
watch the movement. She said Staff can stop giving permits, however.
Commissioner Vo~s said the zoning that might apply in North Naples
should not apply in Immokalee because there are two different kinds of
communities and the zoning has to be structured to accommodate that
f ac t.
Responding to Commissioner Holland, Mr. Saunders said that the
County Commission can set up separate districts for enforcement of
certain types of zoning regulations and the Commission can impose a
moratorium on anforcement in various areas of the County, if there is a
legitimate reason to do so, which he said he thought Staff had pre-
sented. He said it is necessary to clarify what the moratorium will
prohibit and permit.
Co..i..ioner Goodnight .oved, seconded by Co..issioner Voss that a
.o~'atoriUII be placed on enforce.ent of the violation. only, as Staff
reco...nded, until October 1, 1986, on parkin9 co..ercial vehicle. and
equipaent in the RMF-6, MHSD, and MHRP District. in I..okalee and on
exi.tin9 principal and acce.sory use violation. in the area. of
laaoka1e. a. .hown on Exhibit -Ew.
Responding to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Saunders said that Staff can
draft a resolution from the motion, which is clear, for the Chairman's
signature without coming back to the Commission.
Community Development Administrator Mullins suggested that the
doard of County Commissioners make tho motion that Staff draft the
resolution and Staff can bring it back so the Commissioners can see
exactly what is being imposed.
co..i..ioner Goodnight ..ended ber aotlon, and Co..i..ioner VO..
e.ended bi. second that Staff be directed to draft a re.olution
re9arding the above-deacribed .oratoriUII and brin9 it back on October
1, 1985.
In response to Mr. Saunders, Commissioner Voss said the ~oratori~~
would be impos~d whan the resolution is brought back to the Board of
County Commissioners.
&CCK OSH rl',[ 211
Page 15
~m
089 w,t 212
Upon call for the question, the
***RECISS. 10.21 A.M.
September 17, 1985
.otion carried 4/0.
RlcOMVIMED. 10.40 A.".~·*
It.. It
, AJIIIUAL aIDS un 'I'IIROUCB 1864, IXCLUDUIQ BID "63 - AWARDED TO VARIOUS
VlMDORS. BID "65 RI cOURTHOUSI GROUNDS MAINTENANCE TO II BROUGHT BACK
TO ICC OM 9/24/85
Legal notice having been published 1n the Naples Daily News on
July 19, 1985, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication fileð with the
Clerk, bids were received for Bids 1847 through 1855, excluding Bid
1863, for Annual Bids until 2:30 P.M., August 14, 1985.
Public Works Administrator Kuck distributed a tabulation sheet for
Bid 1865 for Courthouse Grounds Maintenance. He said this item is a
recommendation to award bids for various annual contracts for services
and commodities to be procured in Fiscal Yair 19ð5-86. He explained
that the bids have been reviewed by the var'~IJs departments requiring
the materials and services and all departments concur with the
recommendations provided on the Executive'Summary dated 9/9/85. He
said Staff recommends that the Annual Contracts for Bids 1847 through
1862 and Bids 1864 and t865 be awarded to the designated vendors and
that the County Purchasing Director be authorized to allow or disallow
minor price adjustments throughout the year where caused by industry
fluctuations.
Commissioner Voss questioned if the number of square feet was
stipulated in Bid 1865 for Courthouse Grounds Maintenance and Assistant
County Manager Dorrill said in the past Staff provided a site plan and
the areas were shaded that required certain types of maintenan~~. He
said he assumEd the square footage was stipulated but that he would
review this bid. He said the designated vendor is not always the low
biddcr and in some instances, such as for fuel, there are multiple low
bidders based on quotes at the time the material i~ needed.
Tape 14
Responding to Commissioner Holland, Mr. Dorrill said the present
contractor for grounds maintenance is Sparky's Lawn Maintenance,
however, he did not submit the lowest most responsible bid this Ydar.
Due to the large variance in the bids for the Courthouse Grounds
Maintenance the Commissioners decided to continue Bid 1865 until
9/24/85.
co..i.sioner Holland aoved, .econded by co..i.sioner Ha... and
carried 4/0, that Annual Bids '847 through $864, excluding Bid 1863 b.
Page 16
~:::J
E::.:]
~
·..,.,_.."...._~_"._......_,,'......_'".."..,'."e"""'~ "."~_,·.~""^,·_."___._"''''','''__."'.,,...·_"''_"·______·__·II
". _.,'_- ',,1.·., . -'..,
,OOK 08Uw,tZi4 September 17, 1985
as contained in the Executive Summary.
'861 - Concrete Traffic Signal Poles to Hughes Supply, Orlando
Southeastern Prestressed Concrete, West palØl Beach, as
contained in the Executive Summary.
'862 - Traffic Signal Components to C~ntrol Specialists, Orlando,
Transportation Control Systems, Tampa, and Tr3ffic Control
Components, Haines City, as contained in the Executive
SlmIma ry.
'864 - Electrical Service to Phelps Electric, Naples, and
Mid-Continent Electric, Naples, as contained in the
ExecuLiva Summary.
It.. 11 0
MOTOR POOL aUDGET rlMEMDMEMT INcREASI»a OPERATING EXPENSES BY $65,000 -
APPROVED
Responding to Commissioner Hftsse, Fleet Management Director Olliff
said the original budget for the M~tor Pool was formulated around a
certain number of vehicles. He said Moto~ Pool is an inter-service
fund where vehicles are charged for actual use of fuel, insurance and
replacement cost of the vehiclc. He said th~ Motor Pool budget ~as
established for approximately 125 to 130 vehicles and there was no
accurate account of the number of vehicles in the County. He said
there is now a concise asset list and there is an increased number of
vehicles above the amount originally budgeted. He said the increases
in insurance are approximately three times thc amount initially
bUdgeted.
Co..issioner Ha..e aoved, seconded by Co..issioner Goodnight that
the Motor Pool budget amend.ent increa.ing operating expenses by
$65,000 through an equal increa.e in 9reater than anticipated revenue.
be approvad.
Respc~ding to Commissioner Hollönd, Mr. Olliff said that this
revenue will not come out of Reserves since this is a pass-through
account and the revenue will come from the user departments on a
tranlifer.
Upon call for the question, the .otion carried 4/0.
Ite. III
PUBLIC BEARIMG RE PALM SPRIMGS SUBDIVISION WATER SERVICE IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT SCHEDULED POR 10/22/85
Utilities Adminilitrator Crandall said this item refcrs to the Palm
Springs water assessment project. He said after discussions with the
County Attorney's office Staff recommends that another public hearing
Page 18
~
é.~
~
i;¡;1f2J
..___,._".,~.~,._., "·__.w"·__·_'~'"~'···_'·""'~~"··_·_·'·'^~·""_
..
-
~
f':
.!t;:;"'"
'?~;,..l"-
:~~:'¡,',j, be held because the costs
!t~>'?'.·1983 oriCJi0l11 prel1minoHY
¡~"it,"" .
~~7.t proceed with construction documents and plånlS and said StaEf would mill 1.
;~~0 ' benefitted property ownors a notico of tho new assessment.
'V;"
':':.;,'", COllmhsioner Holland moved, seconded by COllllllhsioner Hasse and
~ carried 4/0, that a public hearing re Pal. Springs Subdivision Water
Service Improvement District be scheduled for 10/15/85.
Later in the meeting due to tiØle constraints, Commissioner Holland
amended his motion, and Commissioner Hasse amended his second that the
public hearing re Palm Spring. Subdivision Water Service Improvement
District be scheduled for 10/22/85 and the motion carried 4/0.
Commi.sioner Holland moved, seconded by Commissioner Has.. and
carried 4/0, that the Utilities Administrator be authorized to proceed
with the construction documents for vater improvements and, through the
Clerk, to notify benefitted property owners within the District of the
revised preliminary front footage assessØlents.
Soptemb'H 17, 1985
have increased approximately 18\ sincé the
assessment. He requcsted authorization to
Item 112
MASTER PLAN FOR ALLOCATION OF PHYSICAL SPACE DURING FY 1985-86 -
APPROVED
Assistant County Manager Dorrill ~xplðined this item was discussed
at the 9/10/85 tiCC meeting, however, a vote Nas taken but no motion was
made.
Commissioner Hasse moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight that
the Master Plan for allocation of physical space during FY 1985-86 be
approved.
Commissioner Hasse asked about priority of th~ wðrAhouse and Mr.
Dorrill said the schedule list5 priority. H~ said ðuildin9 "C·,
involving th~ Pro?erty Appraiser and Tax Collector can be considered
the No.1 priority. he said th~ n~xt two priorities ~re the warehouse
and the work in IJullding "D". He said the situation with the Judges is
yet to be resolved and the architects hav~ been in contact with Judge
8rousseau and will pre~are an estimated cost of building a new building
dS well as adding a third floor on Building "J" compared to renovation
o f Bu il din g " A" .
Commissioner Voss said h~ as~ed the Judicial Department to provide
him with a transcript of tne meeting bctw~&n that Department and the
C:nJnty M.Jnager.
Upon call for the question, the motion carried 4/0.
eCOK 089 W,[ 215
Page 19
.,-----,'~,~.__._......._..""_.._,...,.,""¡..,,;,.='^.,
",,,,,~~._.,~-_..._..^;.,~"--,~~,~.~-
~__..__.......______..,..."..-"._.,,,_",._""'____'__"'_'"''''.'''"'''''''"~'''··d,,,,<_,__~,,,,,,,,..fi''~.~_··_''_-''''''''''·_ ....... 'Ii
· .. .,...... .. -.. > -. . ... . .... . . '. ..' ""'.. '. - ... ,. .... '. ... .
..
-
&::1
September 17, 1985
It.. 114
STATUS REPORT ON RESOURCE RECOVERY PROJECT - NO ACTION MEEDED
Assistan~ County Manager Dorrill said Dr. Stoke. requested Staff
to provide the BOArd with a status report on the resource recovery
project. He said 18 re.pon.e. were received to th~ County's Request
for Proposals involving resource recovery. He said by next week Staff
hope. to have an agreement with the County Financial Advisor to do an
analysis of the business and financing proposals in order to compare
the proposals received. He said by 9/27/85, Staff expects to have four
firms selected and the Financial Advisor will evaluate the
presentations of those four firms for consideration of actual oral
presentation~ before the Selection Committee chaired by Dr. Stokes. He
said by the week of 9/30 to 10/4/85 the four firms will be invited to
Collier County to make oral presentations to the Selection Committee
and by the following week Staff expects to have two firms selected to
bring to the Board. He said Staff will request authorization to enter
into negotiation with two firms in order to encourage competition by
the firæ~ involved. He said on 11/5/85 Staff will seek authorization
to proceed with final negotiations for a service delivery contract with
one vendor.
Mr. Dorrill said this schedule is based on an evaluation by the
Committee and a decision by the Board the first week in October when
the Board will hear the Committee's recommendation and determine, based
on an analysis of the tipping fees, whether it is in the County's best
interest to proceed with the r~source recovery project. H~ said if the
schedule proceeds as planned there would be approximately eight weeks
to the end of 1985 t? resolve the financing through the private company
and enter into a final agreement to .eak ground in early 1986.
Mr. Dorrill said it is the consensus of the Committee that the
resource recovery plant be privately owned and operated under a service
contract with Collier County and that the County reserve the right to
buy the facility at the end of a twenty-year service term. He said
anoth~r option is to create a not-for-profit corporation And have the
County lease the fACility from that corporation.
Itell 115
RISOLUTIOM 85-194 APPROVING ASSESSMIMT OF ADDITIONAL $4.00 PENALTY PER.
NONCRIMINAL TRAFFIC VIOLATION BY CLERK or COURTS TO FUND A COUNTY
SCHOQL CROSSING GUAR~ PROGRAM - ADOPTED
County Attorney Saunders explainod the Board approved a $4.00
&CQK 08'9 P~r.{ 29a
Page 22
__,."".""....,,,'~....,"'__~,._._... ",",e""".c·""__,.,._"".
'0" ..",.."..;".,'"_.....",...._~._~._.__~,_._",.___
~. , ,11.,1. .... -- " ..... . .
>' . "'........_""..,.,-, ...._..."'_.........,~-<,~-,._......_""-_._-
-4J1,"',·,,_·_V
...^.-_....."'""'_....."...,...~~,---,,--
"""'""'~"~"""'___'''''''____''''''''''_'''''''"_'''''''''_"__'''_'''''-''C¡'·__'''..._,."_~~__,______,__"~...,.~"._",,.