The URL can be used to link to this page

BCC Minutes 02/18/1986 R uw: 0921'S~-! 221 , :1 February 18, 1986 T.pe .] lb. U AGElIDA - APPROVED WITH TBB FOLLOWI.G CHABGES Commissioner Pistor stated that he had a request to continue Item 6B2 which is Cardinal Industriel, Palmetto Pinel, to March 11, 1986, noting that Ite. 6BJ Cardinal Industriel, North Woodl, has already been'~'~' ,. continued to March 4, 1986. . ;'¡ .,",., Attorney Donald Pickworth, representing Cardinrt Indultrie., '! 'It"" ~ ~ . ' ~', indicated that the reason for asking for a continuance il that ..,....... l' .~"/-;.: neighborhood opposition and they would Uke the opportunity to ' " to resolve those i.sue.. there is be able ,i· , ':"'t'},' Mrs. Sloane Robbins, Mr. Larry Ingram, and Mr. George Keller, noted that there are a lot of reasons for opposition and the people would like to have this petition heard thil date. Coaaillioner a.... .oY.d; ..cond.d by Coaai.sion.r Vos., th.t Ite. 6B2, P.tition R-85-l9C .nd It.. 6B3; '.tition R-85-2OC be he.rd this date. Commis.ioner Goodnight stated that she has not reað any material on Petition R-85-20C and could not make a decision when .he knows nothing about the project. Planner McKi. stated that the petitioner requested a continuance of R-85-20C before the agenda items had to be turned in, and the way this has alwaYI been handled is that it become. part of the agenda that the Petitioner is requesting continuance without any backup material. Co_hsioner Voss .oYeð, seconded by eo..hdoner Goodnight; that the action be a.ended to he.r only Petition R-85-19C. In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Planner McKim stated that it was ajvertised in the Naples Daily News on Sunday as being continued. Planner McKi. stated that they received the final PUD document for R-85-20C this date and Staff is not prepared to give a prelentation on this itell. Attorney Donald Pickworth Itated that the system ii, set up to grant continuances and it hal happened over the yearl, and in fairnesl to everyone, the petitioner il entitled to one continuance. Upon call for the question; the a..nded action carried unaniacusly. Comøtfslfoner Phtor indicated that the motion that remains is that" Petition R-85-20C be continued until Harch 4, 1986. Upon call for the que.tion; the .otion carried unaniaouIly. ", . ~: . 'l.\..~ . , r ....,J ._ , \..4' ~ "t'~', "', l~.\~.;. ¥_;....' .1'0-:' i("_',h t:~ ~·:--..¿'M;' ..' tIt '~~~.. ,,\. ~~ ~ ~¡; {~~:'J ~ .. .. .. . .. ~. .....'" """-"'~""","~' ,-....~....".,,...' '..~;." """,,,",,~.,,,,,,,, ... "'_""",."·h_...._...,'_,..,._,..","'_._4-.._..~""'~"...., .. .. . - c;;;"~):::;~ \' , " I ,:.}}¡:.;.' .**,¡, .'" ~' "1;-~: ~ , ... t.i eoa.hø1oner VOU .oYed, ';~:cari:led ananhloully, that the 0,. chanc¡es t February 18, 1986 uc:onded by Co1uiuioner Goodnight and ac¡enda be approved with the following a. Item 685 continued to March 18, 1986 at request of County Manaqer. b. Item 10EJ continued to February 25, 1986, at request of County Manager. c. Item 13D continued to February 25, 1986, at request of Chairman Pi.tor. d. Item 6BJ continued to March 4, 1986, at reque.t of Petitioner. lte.. t2 MINUTES or JANUARY 2~, 1986 - APPROVED Co..issioner VO'. .oYed, .econded by eoa.i..ioner Goodnight and carried unaniaou.ly, that the ainute. of January 28; 1986, be approyed as presented. :-Ite. '3 'ROCLAHATIO. DESIGJrATIRa TBB WEEK or PZBRtJAR!' 16-22, 1986; AS -JrATIOIfAL ElIGINEERS 1f'EEIt- - ADOP'l'ED Opon reading of the Proc1a.ation; eo..i..ioner Pi.tor aoved; .econd.~ by Coaais.ioner Ba... and carried unaniaou.ly; that the procla.ation designating the week of rebruary 16-22; 1986; a. -Rational Engineer. We.k- be adopted. f.:;t: . ' .<t' -111 \ .. .,'6, :t,· , 'J(,' ' ~.~ / ,ri"' \. .. ',~;'I. :~ , ~. .:.. ~ rJ" 11·',,'¡ ~'r.~~.;f)ì,;.. ..f.'t. t"· '. ". .' i.'di: !.,r~,I" ;~:1-'!o'.!(",<H'¡l'f ' " ·;r~~~ '. ,';' . :¡<~ ';.; ....... ',", Þ~1 j.(; , , , ,'.~ " ., ~ . ',' .) ,'- i' r t..,.1J j ¡ ;!.: I; ¡ t'.:{j' ~ ~ ~ ~ T~ \ . }DO( 092~(·~222 Page 3 . ~ ~ "','1 ',' ~ ," '·,.t~\ -,...~~."...._.,"'.'....... '''''~'~''><-''''""'.''^,,~.,,.., .". """".,,-.-.., .' , , ; . .= . --_·_...__,_.__'"..."'''''"...u........_..'''"..,,,..,.,,,.,';,,'"_,_..~'.......,_."__.,"" "..~_.._,....." _.".."'-;.__._.."........""~.";.,"',.,,,.,, /:".'---- .. . '1. ¡,f'''' ., :,"-~, " Ii ' ~1 . ': . '. ~', - J;~. "'. February 18, 1986 Ite. t4 ORDINANCE 86-0 R! P!'l'ITIOlf Zo-S6-3C, COMMtJRI'l'Y DEVELOPMER'l' DIVI8IOlf, AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2, S!C'1'IOlf 7.9 A-2, RURAL AGRICULTURE DISTRICT SUBSECTION b( J) '1'0 ADD I'l'EM -M- AQUACULTURE AND MARICUL'l'URE .;. AOOP'l'ED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily Newe on January 29, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of PUblication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to coneider Petition ZO-86-3C, filed by the Community Development Division, amending Ordinance 82-2, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the unincorporatpd area of Collier County, Florida, by amending Section 7.9, A-2, Rural Agricultural District, Subsection b(3) permitted provisional usee an~ structures to add item ".", aquaculture and mariculture. Planner McKim stated that the zoning ordinance currently only allows aquaculture æ~~ mariculture as a provisional use in the A-I district and staff feels that it is an appropriate provisional use in the A-2 district as well. She noted that in reviewing the uses allowed in A-I and A-2, all the uses allowed in ~-l are also allowed in A-2 except for this one item, therefore, Staff feels that it may have been an oversight at the time of the zoning as it was allowed previously in the Agricultural District. She stated that Staff recommends that it be allowed in the A-2 district as a provisional use and it will have to come before the BCC for approval. In answer to Commissioner Rasse, Planner McKim .tated that there is an exotic fieh ordinance that prohibits certain fish froa being raised, adding that all provisional uses are reviewed by the Environmental Advisory Council, Water Ma,dgcllent Advieory Board, Planning Commission and the BCC. She staced that by this mechaniem, there will be knowledge and control of what is happening. In answer to Commissioner Holland, Planner HcKi. etated that so.e of the fish farming activities excavate and other. use above-ground tanks, and if there were to be excavaticn, the petitioner would still have to apply for an excavation permit and would have to co.e before the ace. Tape '2 eoaaissioner Voss !IO.ed~ .econded by eoaaissioner Ba.se a"d carried unaniaoUDly, that the public hearing be clo.ed. Commiosioner Goodnight !lOved, .econded by eo.mi..ioner Vo.. and carried unaniaously, that the ordinance a. nuabered and entitled below be entered into Ordinance Book NOO 23. ,;;;o~ 92~~,224 Page 4 .¡t:, , ".-r" ~" i. ~ ,'~;. "·;r j) r . I' rJ"' ~ 4 ;:. \ " I ~ .., , ,,¡ "I" 1 (....~~ ':;:4, ~~. j. ;/4(J: '¡:<>~'"¡:¡¡Ì ."-'!",; ~~,~ , ~~.' ~:;' . . L 1~ 092",,,-225 February 18, 1986 ORDIl'fABCI: 86-8 AB ORDIl'fABCE AMElIDIl'fG ORDIJrA»'CI: 82-2, THE COMPRmfDSIV! ZONING REGULATIOl'fS FOR THE UNINCORPORA'l'ED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, BY AMElIDING SECTION 7.9, A-2 - RURAL AGRICULTUP.z DISTRICTr ITEM b.3), PERMITTED PROVISIONAL USES AND STRUCTURES, TO ADD ITEM -.-, AOUACULTUR.8 ABD HARICULTUR.8~ ABD PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. He. .5 ~~. PETITIOl'f R-85-19C, CARDIl'fAL INDUSTRIES; INC. _ DENIED 'l' , Legal notice having been pubUshed in the Naplee Daily Newe on .... I,"',." r;.~>(/: J~~uary 17, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of PubUcation filed with ..,.;";.,,. the Clerk, public hear ing was opened to consider Peti t ion R-85-l9C, filed by Cardinal Industries, Inc. requeeting a rezone from A-2 to PUD known as Palmetto pines Apartments, Ltd., for a maximum number of 184 dwelling units on 20.4 acres, located on the north eide of Davis Blvd., between Airport Road and County Barn Road, east of Foxfire PUD in Section 6, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. Planner McKim stAted that the objective of this petition ie to rezone the property from A-2 to PUD for a maximum of 184 multi-family, entry-level rental dwelling units. She noted that all eurrounding lands are zoned A-2 and lands to the north, east and west are undeveloped with lands to the south, acrose Davie Blvd, being a plant nursery and undeveloped land. She reported that in reviewing this petition for compliance ~ith 'the Comprehensive Plan, the petitioner had the option to achieve the density that they requeeted by doing one of three items and the item that they chose was to commit to the 100', affordable housing as defined by the Comprehensive Plan, as amended~ She noted that the project hae incorporated all the iteme required for the PUD to meet the affordable multi-family entry level rental housing section of the zoning ordinance. She stated that etafl and all County agencies reviewed the petition and recommended approval subject to the amendment of the PUD document per the staff report dated January 30, 1986. She indicated that the Collier County Planning Commission held their public hearing and recommended forwarding this petition to the Board for approval subject to staff stipulation with the additional stipulation that the PUD document be amended under Section IV.F.2 to recognize that the Fair Share Traffic Impact Ordinance has been adopted and that they will abide by that. She reported that there was no correspondence received on this petition and at the CCPC no one spoke for or against the petition and the recollllendation is that the petition ~~I; '''~"r., I':'~:' ~~- . '.. ,.(~. . . ?f'~ "'~,,1," ' , ~I-tj. ' J:~t. ,~;~.) . ~'!i~ , ,-" . I, .; ï.. I, - - - ----'" ->'~'-____.;'>e''''' """'-"";"-~""<~"""''''''''''''-~''''''''.'''~~''''-~''''" , .. ''''~ f ,/ ~ ¡~ ~j'~. , .. r. ;¡":' ___""""""""""",",,~w,,~,~, "",""~"'." '..~ . ." :¿f"" ~<.'.o , .ft! ·1_ - .. - February 18, 1986 be approved subject to the Planning Com=iesion's recommendation. In answer to Co=missioner Rasee, Planner McKim stated that Cardinal Industries is under contract to purchase the property contingent upon the zoning being approved. Attorney Donald PicKworth, repreeenting Cardinal Industries, etated that since there is going to be considerable public com~ent, he would like to reserve time at the end to r~spond to commente that are made. Mr. Stan Chrzanowski of Coastal Engineering etat_d that Pa1netto Pines is about 600 feet east of the Foxfire Development. He noted that the units will all be one story rental units, adding that they will all be located near the front half of the eite by Davis Blvd. adding that there was some concern about an area in the back half of the property that is environmentally sensitive and therefore, thie area will be preserved. He stated that the lake will be large enough for water management purposes and the fill under the buildings will not be brouJht up too high so that local vegetation can be saved. He noted that the Subdivision Review Committee wanted a second access fron the parking lot for emergency purposes as one access from Davis Blvd. was not enough. adding that the petitioner agreed to this. He stated that the petitioner has also agreed to install a water main that would loop from Wild~o~ Estates to the front of the petitioner's project and that sewage disposal for the project will be run through Loch Louise. He reported that the petitioner has agreed to put in a bike path across the front of his project. Ms. Jackie Thomaø of Cardinal Industries etated that Cardinal Industries is a priv~:ely held company that has been in existence eince 1954 in Cclumbus, Ohio. She etated that Cardinal Industries is the largest modular builder of units throughout the United Statee and the fourth largest builder of multi-family houeing unite in the United States. She noted that they have built over 700 apartment complexes through the midwest, the south and the eaet. She noted that Cardinal' Industries makes a determination in an area that there is need for aoderately priced housing before they build, and they .ake eure 'that these complexes are close to shopping, echools, services, and point of e=ployment which is why they chose the Davie Blvd. site. She noted that the property is purchased, the project i. built, and then it i. managed by Cardinal Industries with their own property management division which maintains approximately 37,000 apartments and with that ~-~~ 092 P~':f 226 Page 6 /, , '!.";¡,,, .. ""t. ... . "...< .!".:' " ., ___...___'_....__.....____"'."'~".M ,',,,,,,""'''-",''_''' . ¡~~l'\;" I~-;!:i ;- - t' ~1 . .~~ -: ,"~. .",~ ..:.,'. ( ,1, &i:::( '. ;~.t;, , ' ,·····l, .~~"".~.,' tl' '. _"""n.._",~~,_,...",...."."."._.....,. _"",",.".",,, ,-.., 1m 092"n227 amount of apartments, the occupancy rate is arounð 96-97'. She stated that Cardinal is basically promoting a single-family home atmoephere in a multi-family project, adding that each unit has their own private entrance, patio and utility room. She stated that the project is landacaped very heavily from front to back and she presented photographs (Exhibit "A") to the eommieeion showing how the landscaping looks. She stated that Cardinal Industries feel they can add a lot to the local area if thia petition is approveð. In answer to Commissioner pietor, Me. Thomas etated that t1¡~se ~. ."" f~: units are State approved by Tallahasa. and all have the State seals. " In answer to COJII.iesioner Voss, Ms. Thomas stated that the one-bedroom unite are 576 square feet with an approximate rental of $369 and the two-bedroom units are 864 square feet with an approximate rental of $509. Commissioner Hasse stated that there has been a consiðerable amount of problems in this area regarding drainage and questioned if thia project will have an impact on the drainage or create an additional problem? Public Works Administrator Kuck stated that the District 6 report takes this whole area into consideration an~ reCOm- mendations will be forthcoming ae to how to improve the area. Mr. Kuck stated that the final drainage plans will have to come back to be approved if this project goes forward, adding that there are problems with discharge in the area. The following people spoke in oppoeition to the petition citing lack of affordable housing, type of conetruction, the project demanding more in community services than it will contribute to the community tax base, questioning whether this project qualifies as a PUD, lack of pertinent information with reference to stockholders, and the small square footage, Larry Ingraa February 18, 1986 . , , ~. , Tape .3 George Iteller Jack Jenkins Sloane Robbins Jim Meerpohl Attorney Pickworth stated with referonce to growth paying for growth, Cardinal Industries' commitment exceeds the concerns of any of the speakers. He noted that a water line will be constructed by the developer in addition to paying impact fees, the units meet all etate and local building codes: and the project also meets all the require- menta for a PUD. He stated, with reference to prices, theee units are Melva Rauch Joyceanna Rautio Page 7 , .' " - - - " , .. ~ ,) :¡ ';.'.!!~ ~ '" .. - .. ~,~' ',-~., .' ' .,. J-} , February 18, 1986 rentals and not condominiua developments and they also have on-site management and, as far as affordable housing, the County has over many years, had in its regulations, various criteria with reepect to affordable housing which this project meete, otherwise, the staff would not have recommended approval. He stated that the Department of Housing and Urban Development defines moderate income houeing as housing w.,ich is affordable by persone whose income ie RO' of the are. median, which is $20,000. In answer to Commissioner Pistor regarding recreational areas, Mr. Pickworth stated that Cardinal Industries does not put in the active type of ammenities like the swi~in9 pool and the golf course as the price of the units would increase and would no longer be aoderate. He stated that the recreation would be llare passive. Ms. Thomas stated that it is good to have ammenities in apartment complexes, but those people that are working do not really use the facilities that much. She stated that she has found over the years, that the projects do very well without the active recreation. Tape t4 In answer to Commissioner Pistor, Me. Thomas stated that the .aintenance, sewer, water, and trash is included within the rent, adding that the only extra to the renter would be the electric and telephone. eo.aiesioner Roll.nd aoved, e.cond.d by Coaai.sion.r H.... .nd carried unanimously, th.t the public h..ring be closed, Co..issioner Ha~ee aoved, seconded by Coaaission.r Bolland .nd carried unaniaou.ly, that P.tition R-85-19C be d.ni.d. ..... Receesr 10r40 A.M. - Reconv.n.dr 10.55 A.M. ..... Itea '6 PETITION R-85-24C, DOHENIC D'AGOS'l'INO - COI'1'IRUED TO 3/11/86 Coa.issioner Vose aoved, e.conded by Co..ission.r Goodnight and carried 3/0, (Co~is.ion.rs Rolland .nd Raee. out of the roca) that Petition R-85-24C, co.enic D'Agostino~ b. continu.d to Karch 11; 1986. Itaa t7 PETITION R-85-28C, WILSON, MILLER, BARTON; BOLL , PEEK MARCR 18, 1986 CORTINtJED TO Commiesioner Vose aoved, second.d by Goodnight and carried unaniaouely, that Petition R-85-28C, Wilson, Miller; B.rton, 8011 , Pee~, be continued to March 18; 1986. ;; 092 PJr.! 228 Page 8 -, . '~, r ~,~ 'I¡It~ 10. ".,.~). '." ',M ~"" 'i':i 'C~ ,"'.'!' -~"~~1 .... -"~,~:, , ~ ;, ": ';1' I,I? '.. -~ ~---._~_ .......·_,_'..·'*___.''';.."'''h,.'''...."~...;.,..'''''''".,''''''''''~_'''_.,>''".".."''''''._....,._...."..__,.,''"~,,.~ ;"/,- 1011'( 092 PJr,! 229 Ite. t8 PE'l'ITIOS SHP-8S-SC, ROLE~ MeRTES ~ ASSOCIATES, INC. REPRESENTISG YOLAKDA M. JAEGER, REQUESTI.G MAS'l'ER PLAR APPROVAL FOR JAEGER Pt7D - APPROVED SUBJECT TO STIPULATIOSS February 18, 1986 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on February 2, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to coneider Petition SMP-8S-5C, filed by Hole, Montes ~ ...eeociatee, Inc. representing Yolanda M. '... ~ ' . ....' ~#~eger, requesting Master Plan approval for Jaeger PUD located in the east 355 feet of the SE 1/4 of Section 10, T49S, R25E lees the 50' for right-of-way. Planner McKim stated that the subject property ie located on the north side of Pine Ridge road approximately one mile eaet of U.S 41, and is adjacent to the east side of Pine Ridge Middle School. She reported that one of the requiremente of the PUD was approval of the Subdivision Master Plan for Tract -B-, which is being accompliehed through this petitio"" She noted that Staff and all appropriate County agencies reviewed this petition and recommended approval subject to the ,stipulations contained in the Executive Summary. She reported that the CCPC held their pUblic hearing on February 6, 1986 and recommended approval subject to etaff etipulations. She indicated that no correspondence has been received regarding this petition and no one spoke for or against the petition. She stated that the petitioner's representative did not sign the Agreement sheet at the CCPC hearing due to his disagreement with the stipulation that indicates that the water main extensions shall be run to the north property line for future looping or extension provisions. She stated that the recommendation is that the BCC approve the petition subject to all the stipulations. Commissioner Voss stated that Item wE- should have the word .. ¡~ Wbefore" inserted so that it would read that the wetland preserve area shall be fenced, roped-off, or flagged before and during development. Mr. George Hermanson of Hole, Montes' Associates, repreeenting the Petitioner. etated that he has no probleme with any of the stipulations with the exception of Stipulation -J-. He etated that this project is located immediately west of the Industrial Par~ on Pine Ridge Road, adding that the water main serving the project would run the whole length of the road to serve all the various lots with a couple of services off the Tract -Aw which is not being platted, as this is one parcel that is strictly for self-storage facilities. He .~ , : J.. .~ , ~ \ .. .. ~a~e'·19.>.t~ ¿-). ~ . . -:~'f ~ ~,~. . ~{: . , J? ,. r t~'" ': '(. ~,'....t' L,..... ,~ ' ;~...~!.", ~':s:'t,;;.~ " ~~}{!;"' >li... ~,:~. . r . .. W_ø'llll!t__ - - - ~,;.:~-4 ~..:...," ¡J¡. ~;r I ~ -~ .. .. . ~ '. .- " February 18, 1986 noted that there is a lake that encompaseee the entire northern boundary of the project for retention, adding that he eubaitted plane some months ago and did not receive any coament on it until h. started going through the subdivieion procee.. He noted that the Utilitiee Division is asking that the stipulation be added that the aain go to the north property line so that it could be looped at eometime in the future to someone else. He stated that he does not feel that it should be a mandatory requirement in writing, adding that it is a judgement call and something that should be discussed with utilities when getting the drawings approved. He stated that it is an undue requirement of the petitioner as it is going to add 35-40\ to hie coet for construct- ing a water main 2000 feet and adding another 800 feet Which is about a 40\ increase. He stated that the petitioner does not need this, as all he needs is a water main from end to end, not the extra 800 feet. He stated that it does not service any additional lot.. He stated that this petition meets all the requirements of the County and the Fire District and the addition of the 800 feet of water aain aakes it easier for the next developer to the north to tie to it. He stated that he feels that it should be the future developer's responeibility to make connection with that water main, adding that Mr. Jaeger has offered to provide easements around the lake so that a main could be installed at a future time, which would become a part of the plat, a designated utility easement. He reported that Mr. Jaeger hae given a number of easements to the COunty for drainage, utilities, maintenance and access at no cost. He noted that there are no particular County, plans to loop that system to anyone else or any other facility. Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that there is no regulation that says the COunty has to extend that water main to the property line, adding that this has been required of other developers. He noted that the problems that the petitioner would encounter in extending that main would also be encountered by whoever has to extend."':'; ,>(, '..'~! it at some future date, adding that he feels that it is reasonable that .,.',. , "I" they go to their property line. He stated that in the beginning the ,:':-/;;', County will not own the _in, the City of Naplee will, but eventually ,:/~,,,F,, the County will own it when they take over that eervice area. : .. Commissioner Voss stated that it would be enough to expect if the petitioner is willing to give the necessary ease.ente. Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that it hae been expected in the past and has been a reasonable requirement. ',"~ , , ~ 092"";1230 Page 10 :.. _~'·""'''''·.··_'.''__.'+__'''''·''''H''''-",,_,".~, ,..,...__""''-".....'~ _"... .(,",,-"1>-." .__-..__""'___,....,.._""__'"'.,""""~...........~....,....." .-- - - .. - " .i¡Î... " February 18, 1986 ,Its. no RESOLUTION 86-26 RE PETI~Ioø PU-85-20C, AGNOLI, ASSAAD, BARBER AND BRUNDAGE, REPR!:SElM'ING RAYMOtrD CHES'1'l:R ABD ARMAlfD ROUT.!: IUI: PO -b- OF ,1.-2 FOR A BORROW PIT NORTH OF SR-84 WEST OF EVERGLADES BLVD. - ADOP'l'ED Planner McKim stated that the objective of this petition ie to obtain a provisional use 3 "b" of the ,1.-2 zoninq district for earth ~inin9' She reported that lands to the north, south and west are zoned ,1.-2 and lands to the east are zoned E-Estatee. She stated that due to the isolated location of the subject property and the low density development that can occur in this area, Staff finds the affects on neighboring properties to be negligible in relation to noise, glare, odor and economics. She reported that given the i£~lated rural location of the subject property and the lack of development of the adjacent properties, Staff finds the proposed provisionaL uee to be compatible with adjacent properties. She indicated that Staff and all appropriate County agencies reviewed this petition and recommended approval subject to the stipulations found in the Executive Su..ary dated February 12, 1986. She stated that the CCPC held their public hearing and based on their Findings of Fact, they unani~ously recom- mended forwarding this petition to the Board for approval eubject to the stipulations. She state1 that two letters of opposition have been received with concerns about the effects upon adjacent property valuee and one letter was received requesting additional information. She reported that at the cePe hearing no one epoke for the petition and one person spoke against the petition expressing environmental concerns. She stated that the recommendation is for approval subject to CCPC's recommendations. Tape '5 Mr. Wafaa Assaad of Agnoli, Assaad, Barb,r and Brundage, etated that the proposed provieional use ie for a borrow pit on 80 acree of land located in the Estates area, weet of Evergladee Blvd. north of Alligator Alley. He stated that the site is currently zoned A-2 and is requesting a provisional use that woul~ allow a borrow pit to be used sOlely for constructing I-75. He stated that the excavation is about 56 acres of land and the utility portion of the property will be about 4 to 5 acres and there will be about 20 acres left for .itigation and enhancing the life around the lake. He stated that this particular piece of property was selected because it is among the driest in the area. He noted that the slte was inspected by State agencies as well &00« 092 PA'.! 236 Page 13 ',""::;;J , , ';,. :ti,~<' ;;,~..;..:~ . 'Ät' ; '",,;. ,. ,--""'----_._-_.,.....<..,,,.-"'" --___,·.111 .~___......"'r__...._'..-...-__u__....,_,_,..,__,. l; _.- 1* 092 f')';! 237 February 18, 1986 as County agenciee and it has been determined that this property ie suitable for the proposed ~evelopment. He etated that the State has requ~sted an extensive amount of Mitigation iteMs, like phaeing of the borrow pit, berming around it, allowing additional top Boil to be left on the banks of the excavated lake so that it could be ueed as a mitigating item later on, and sloping around the excavation lake of one to ten which will enhance the environmental value of the property. He noted that all agencies have recommended approval. He reported that the person that spoke against the petition at the CCPC has been ,..t-'. contacted and the proble.. re.olved 80 that there i. no opposition fro. him at this time, adding that he is requesting that accese be ueed west of the canal. He stated that this eite i. located weet of the canal and part of the application is that acceee be west of the canal down to Alligator Alley to 1-75 so that he will not have to conetruct a crossing across the canal. He stated that when thie development was discussed with the surrounding property owners, some of them were in favor of constructing a permanent bridge across the canal and SOme of them were against it, adding that the stipulation of the agreeMent with the Engineering Department, is that ehould the developer not be able to get access west of the canal, then the developer would be required to build a temporary bridge to crose the canal and upon cOMpletion of the excavation business, the temporary bridge access will be removed. Re stated that if the temporary bridge ehould have to be put in, the developer will be responsible for maintaining all the roads that are used for travel in their present condition or better. He stated that the bonding that the County Engineering Department will require will include sufficient amounts of money to cover that stipulation. In answer to Commissioner Pistor, Mr. Assaad stated that the excavation will be about 20 feet. Mr. Dan Brundage of Agnoli, Assaad, Barber' Brunðage etated that part of the appUcaton package is the Water Management Plan which has been reviewed and approved by the Water Management Department and will also be required to be reviewed and approved by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulations and the South Florida Water Management District. He noted that the Water Management Plan is very si.ilar and typical of borrow pit operations, in that the developer is proposing that the excavation be accomplished in two phases, Phase One would be the area that would be worked and the waters that will be required to be removed from that phase will be stored in a Phase Two area, thereby I, "" f~.,." .' ).... ... ~,U:"'-." f'1!'i'¡'~'~ ~ ."~.. #"?,.,. I,,'\Z~""',:' \"I~' , ~' , 'r...·... ~,.."....~:.> I Page 14 ",t,"'¡";,...,'.,', .~ f,< ,.".~ -I ::~,~~_: ~:. ..' .: '- it·_r;;~ ):.ii".' , t .~,~ . .- ~~; "'-.,,' - - - ._~-....,"'''''-~'',....,',._",.,.,<~"....,.__.,_.". -"'~-";"'-'"''-''--<'-'-'-'-'''''''-' , '. .ç. - - - ~'~I :, ~~..~~.r~ ",'¡."'¡ ,4" t"t, A¡J",~ , ')ii '4t",., .,'''~'''''':'~'' ';;'.' '"'~ . "~!f:".j " . . '"\.,·~I i'd , '~.' .~ "i"i .', February 18, 1986 allowing no net lose of water from the area to be diecharged. He etated that by etoring all the watere on eite, the developer will be maintaining groundwater levels in the area. He stated that when Phase One excavation is completed, there will be a natural looking lake which will eerve as the source of discharge for water from Phase Two drea. He stated that excess etormwater discharges from the site will be allowed to exit the area during construction by way of weir control structures which will be approved by both DER anð SFWMD. He stated that upon completion, the plan is to remove the berming that will be associated with the water management featuree and to restore the area back to a natural grade along with various mitigated measures that have been recommended to them by the Environmental Department, euch ae reforresting the area with various hardwoods as well as some wetland species along the lake bank. He stated that the proposal of the plan is to vegetate the area and by proposing a 10-to-l side slope, which is a very shallow side slope, the intent is to provide a large zone where wetland vegetation can br reintroduced to the area. He stated that by proposing these mitigated measures and implementing the Water Manage- ment Plan as proposed, the environmental condition of the area will be maintained and enhanced. He stated that the water level in the area has been impacted by the Golden Gate canal eystem which is located immediately adjacent to the excavation, adding that although there are wetland species on the site, they have been impacted and what the developer is proposing will have no affect on this and if anything, it will probably improve the ground~ater recharge in the area because of the storage capabilities of the lake. In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Aesaad stated that the closest resident is a considerable distance from the excavation, adding that there are no residents directly above the property. He stated that some 'of the contiguous property owner. to the north intend to ' "if '¡"}:~""I ;' build on their prC'Jperties in the future and they were in attendance .../ ,¡, during the meetings and seemed to be in favor of the proposal.' ;I";,'~:""',::,: In answer to Commissioner Haee_ regarding the aDOunt of the bond, Mr. Brundage stated that this will be worked out with the Public Works Administrator, adding that th_ value of the road and any reconstruction would be taken into consideration. ',.~ Public Works Administrator Kuck stated that the amount has not' been discussed, but the stipulation has been agreed upon, adding tha~ whatever bond he comes up with, the developer will furnish. He stated ~~; 092 ~'-! 238 pag_ 15 -..." P' ~ .', ~ :'.", -': 10M 092 ~'.~ 239 Pebruary 18, 1ge6 that a typical ~nd of reconstructing a street would be around $20,000 per mile. He stated that there hre several streets involved, adding that another stipulation on this project i. that the material is to be used for 1-75 construction only, adding that this material, therefore, will not be delivered throughout the Estatee area. Mr. Assaad stated that the whole idea ie that if this excavation is not used for I-75, then there is no valid permit. Re stated that the last time there were segments of I-75 constructed in Collier County, excavation permits were declared an emergency item because none of the pits were permitted ahead of time and thie time the developer has elected to do a little planning by selecting the site and getting a full review. He stated that it has been agreed that should the peti- tion not be part of the I-75 construction, then it will not be utilized at all. He stated that this is part of the conditional approval that he is requesting this date. Commissioner Haese stated that there thould be a etipulated amount recommended for the bond. Mr. Kuck stated that the amount of bond ie to be approved by the County Engineers, adding that the stipulation could be put on that before it is approved, it could be brought back to the Board for their approval. He etated that the figure that he would uee is $20,000 per mile of any of the roads that the developer is ueing to get to Alligator Alley or I-75. Commissioner Holland questioned When the excavation i. planned to begin, to which Mr. Assaad stated that there is not a time schedule yet, but it is tradition that when the deeign and conetruction con- tracts are let on State highways euch as 1-75, there ie a certain period of time to perform to completion. He stated that he did not feel that any of that time should be wasted in e.curing permits, which is why this is being done at this time. He stated that the provisional use permit has a one year time limit and if that doee not get exercieed in one year, then the permit either expires or the developer has to apply for an extension for one more year. Commissioner Holland etated that it ie his understanding that the first segment of the road to be completed i. in Broward County and questioned if they are anticipating using this fill dirt to haul from the pit to the Broward County l~ne? Mr. Assaad stated that this has not been anticipated because of the hauling distance, adding that the developer has eetimated the" ~'" . ,;I·~· , .'~,\'"~ ". t.x,'{...., ')' , Jtia.IPt ' ... ... Iì' ~t,~·.- , '.~~, ·.,'~t :, '"1',"1!~ ( ~~c'~'_ t>4'>'~'~;·('· '" <'r'-' ;'" " Page ~, f .~. - - - ..,-..--__"'_.."~.,,.~·"'_·,.......w - ... . .':'\, ''P ~,-t:~; '~'~¡A.';'¡¡" ....,y,ft,,·,·,I, ,'/ t , 'f-:i 0( :,~ ;I' ,:' .. ~,t,"~ , ., .', ':J' ";;Æ-" "J , :~';""""1 .,.j,. . - I, ..,:.t,. , '~f; February 18, 1986 travel distance from the site to the borrow pit of 10 miles, as beyond that it would not be economically feasible. Commissioner Holland stated that he is amazed that the developer obtained the approval of the Water Management Derartment and the Environmental Department as it ie extremely close to one of the major water sources. He questioned what type of material will be obtained ,~ froM the pit? Mr. Brundage stated that there is approximately 8 feet of overburden which would be consisting of top soil, sands and that type of material and then below that to the depth of 20 feet, there is a loose mixture of limerock ehells which are not consolidated into a firm limerock, so it is fairly easy to process to excavate. He etated that they are not anticipating any blasting and the materiale seem to be good for use of limerock bases and for stabilized sub-grade. Commissioner Holland stated that he cannot see jeopardizing the water supply and questioned when the excavation goee down 20 feet, who will check this and determine what the depth is? Mr. Brundage stated that SFWMD and DER have not yet permitted the project, adding that they are in the procese of rAviewing it. He stated that application has been made and if there are any concerns, they will be addressed. He stated that as far as the proximity of this project to the wellfield, they are far removed fro~ that and there should not be any negative impact from any type of operation that the developer is doing. He stated that they will not be a heavy user of water and it will be stored on site, so that it will remain there and when the developer is finished with the site, there will be a natural storage facility which will promote groundwater recharge in the area to take place. County Attorney Saunders stated that there is a ordinance that is being drafted at this time, and he affirmation from the petitioner, that he would agree conditions of that new blasting ordinance. Mr. Brundage stated that if there i!!l a new ordinance put 1n place; '" they would be bound to agree to those conditione. Commissioner Voss stated that the Engineering Department dOuld determine the bond as they have always done and there is no need for it to come back to the Board for approval. County Attorney Saunders stated that there is a formula in Sec- tion 9-1/2.21 of the code which Staff will use to determine the '¡ new blasting i ..",s,¡." wou ld 1 );e sOlie : ..~2;: \ I with the terms and,,:';~' " i . :,~ :~ ,: ,. t~ ' ~D~'~ 092 w·t 240 Page l7 f ' <;... )tII( 092~,...!24.1 "February 18, 1986 appropriate bond. Commissioner Holland stated that accorðing to the back-up ~aterial, it indicates that there will be an eetimated 140,000 tr~~kloads of material coming from the pit, adding that this will create more of a hazard on the roads than there is now. .. Mr. Kuck stated that during the construction or the hauling process, the roads will have to be maintained up to the County's expectations, but once the excavation is completed, the roads will have to be rebuilt. He stated that if they are not done, then this is when the security bond would be used. He stated that he understande that .,. within the year there will be eome contracts let in Collier County. Mr. Assaad stated that the agreed upon option which is number one alternative is to provide access paralleling the canal on the west side, adding that this way the Developer does not have to conetruct any te~porary bridges or use any of the existing streets. He stated, ,howe~er, if they fail to accomplish thp. access to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department, they will then have to 'construct a temporary bridge crossing the canal and using the existing streets. Re noted that any streets that are used will have to be maintained to the degree equal or better than what they now are. He stated that in one instance, the street will have to be widened. He noted that the bonding that has to be done to satisfy the excavation permit will have to include all the anticipated expeneeø to restore the roads to an equal to or better condition. He stated that if this excavation ie not permitted, the fill for 1-75 has to co~e fro. some place and this eeems to be an appropriate location that will be permitted by the Government because it meets certain standards and also eeems to be close enough so that the traveling distance an~ hauling distance is not that eignifi- cant. He stated that if this ie not approved, the fill material would end up coming from the urban area of Collier County which will use more " ;..' roads and cost more money. Mr. Brundage stated that there are two possible ways of providing access to 1-75 construction from the borrow pit, adding that ~ne would be along the western side of the canal which would be the number one choice, but the problem is that when you tie into Alligator Alley, there is a bridge there and guard railing and it would be a hazardous locatio~ for construction traffic if the existing lanes of Alligator Alley are going to be maintained traffic-wise. He noted that if construction of I-75 were to proceed in such a manner that there would Page ~1iil:,; ¡11'~ ~~,..' f~Þ:~-' I ~.~:,(.~_. (, " ')f>. ¡ ., if~ ¡'~', ~ ~' ,. ,~" ~ ... ,: - - - """"'''-'""'''''-'''''--''-'''''-' ...""..-.- 18 \ '':> ..~,,:~ ....~.~ ~ ~~ .: :'~." .,,~;.: . ';¡¡. .~~: , '-, __''"~''"''''''''_·'',__.,''''e''~~".""....",,,,,,,,_·,~. .., '/ - - 'zt~ I i,,. ~/iV1 "ji:~4 " "'~¡ '" ~'" .,' ',', " ., 'Ir ~~'-";¡.,; t.~~, ~\~J: ....~ - ,. . February lR, 1986 be some other traffic mechanism where those existing lanes would be abandoned, then that could be used as an access point, but that is sort of a nebulous type of solution, they have proposed the alternate route of traveling to the east to Everglades Blvd. and then down Everglades Blvd. to the alignment and of course, they would improve and replace the roadways required by the County Engineering Department. He etated that they are proposing that one of the corridors that they uee to get to Everglades Blvd. will be widened, Commissioner Holland questioned if his client has a contract with the State to furnish this fill, to which Mr. Brundage stated that the contract is pending approval by the State DOT. Co..issioner Voes ~ed; seconded by eoa.issioner Goodnight and carried 3/2, (Co..iseioners Rolland and Haese opposed) that Resolution 86-26 re Petition PU-85-2OC, Agnoli, Assaad, Barber' Brundage; representing Raywond Chester and Ax.and Houle re PU -b- of A-2 for a borrow pit north of SR-84 and w~st of Everglades Blvd. be adopted subject to the Petitioner's Agree.ent and the Pindings of Pact. . '- 'I~' , f, .' !'(, :,. "'. . it ",':~!·..;~ç.v'¡' '-~~~'i , " , . ~, .T!. ;f~;! ;,.. " j".i fl Lift <I '. '.f/; uf of j'~ ··,';.r .- " '1 'I ! I . ,~ ·,;f. ·tr( '}-;,¡;:"'-:' , ..' . t . -j j..:,. ~ '. ~ It }~.¡ r"Oj '~J:C," :' '!lif'ó:,\ . .' .t.t,'fr..;rt J it··, r ,f ~ 40.',; r. . ~ " ' ")': !..~ :.': t ¡ r:r,; '¡~ ..' IDO( 092 PAr,~ 242 Page 19 d! ! i~: - .. .. if r,'j '-' .,+'''' ~... .~. ~,. ..' '~.1lt¡; February 18, 1986 , Ite. III EXCAVATION PERMIT NO. 59.231, CHES'l'ER/ROOLE PIT - AP'ROVED Co..issioner Voss aoved, eeconded by Co..iesioner Goodnight ~nd carried 3/2, (Co..ilsioners Rolland and Rasee oppoeed) that excavation per.it No. 59.231, Chester/Soule Pit be approved. Tape .6 Ite. t12 EMERGENCY ORDINABCE RE HORATORItJM' ON ISSUABCE or BUILDIRa PERMITS FOR RIDEAWAT BEACH - .0 AC'l'ION. STAn TO RETURØ IR TWO WEEltS WITH FTJRTm:R RECOMMElfDATIONS Community Development Administrator Mullins etated that ehe is anticipating the surveys for Hideaway Beach to be completed by the Engineering Department by the end of this week which will allow the Community Development Staff to analyze them to come up with reCOm- mendations and to appear back before the Board in two weeks. She stated that because of this, ehe is requesting that thie ordinance be withdrawn and Staff be allowed to issue permits that can meet eetback lines ae detailed in the PUD document. She etated that thoee that cannot meet the requiremente will not have a permit iesued, adding that when she comes back to the Board in two weeks, recommendations will be made to amend the PUD document for the eetback lines and if the building per.its meet those requiremente at that time, the permits can be issued. County Attorney Saunders etated that the moratorium that was imposed two weeks ago expires this date, and there will not be a moratorium pending final survey by Staff, but if there are building permits for sites and Staff determinee that those sites cannot meet the setbacks required under the Planned unit Development Document, then they will not issue building permits, for the individual site. ': ' Attorney John passidomo, representing the Developer of Hid~áw~y ~'~~~~~ Beach. stated that the Developer nor any other affected property owner '~I¡:t: ~ :J j ,~ _ was notified of the hearing, but he h happy to hear that this 'ie now being handled on a more constructive basis. He stated that there are 29 lots which would be affected and his client owns 2 of 'thoee!29 lots. He reported that some of the lots have beach erosion and some are minimal, but there are eome that do not have probleme, adding that he is pleased to see the approach that Staff is now taking. . Co..iseioner Pietor stated that there i. no action required; noting that th~ COllllission accepts the .erbal reco..endation and staff ~~~ 092 PAr,{ 248 Page 20 . ,r _"·___''''_.·_,~._,,c.,''''.. """'0'»" 9I.·__·,_·__.,__,........O_"""''''''''''"'..,.·..-.-.,_''....'''",.-.'h_...''·_.__.,.''~"._.,"';,_.__""._".,,""_.,_,"""., _'O"._~,,,..."',.""_"... 'r .. 092PAr,¡,249 February 18, 1986 viII return to the Board in t~ week. with farther recoa.enðationa. I te. n 3 BIDS 86-935/937 FOR IHHO~EE LABDPILL COVER MATERIAL; PZRCING, SEED~ PERTILIZER AND MULCH - AWARDED TO VARIOUS VENDORS Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily Newe on January 23, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavits of Publication filed with the Clerk, bids were received for Bide 86-935, 86-936, and 86-937 for the Im~okalee Landfill cover ~aterial, fencing, seed, fertilizer, and mulch until 2:30 P.M. February 5, 1986. Public Works Administrator ~uck stated that the objective of thie item is to award contracts for the purchase of landfill cover material, fencing, seed, fertilizer and mulch for the Eustis Street Landfill in Immokalee. He stated that the purchase of these ~aterials are necessary in order to bring the Eustis Street Landfill in Immokalee up to the Flcriòð Pepðrtment of Environmental Regulation Standards. He indicated that plans and epecifications were prepared by Staff in April, 1985, and nir~ bids were received and opened, adding that the bids ranged from $429,717 to a high of $679,467. He stated that all bids were rejected an¿ in view of the exceesive cost, the County elected to purchase the materials and accomplish the work from County resources for a considerable savings of approximately $200,000. He reported that sealed bids for the purchase of cover ~aterial, fencing, seed, mulch, and fertilizer were opened by the County Purchasing Department on February 5, 1986. He reported that the recommendation is that the low bid~er be awarded the bid, noting that Bid Ro. 86-935 for Landfill Cover Material ehould be awarded to Bunn Conetruction of Naples who was the low bidder of three sub.ittals for all fill requlreaente with a bid of $206,678.40, Bid No. 86-936 for Seed~ Fertilizer, and Mulch ehould be awarded to Coaetal Fertilizer of Raple. as the low bldðer of 7,650 pounds of fertilizer at $937.13. Re stated that Haile-Dean of Winter Gardpn~ Plorid~, vas low bidder for 510 pounde of quick growing grass eeed at $132.60 and 1,700 pounde of per.anent grass seed at $2,354.50 and Little Sprout of Raples subaitted the only bid for 68 tons of mulch at $120 a ton for $8,160. Re reported that for Bid 86-937 for fencing, Superior Fencing of Port Myers was the low bidder for 3,390 linear feet of 4-strand barbed vire and a 12' double qate at a cost of $3,675.60. He stated that the fiscal impact on the County is a total cost of $221,938.23 to be paid for out of Fiscal Year 1985-86 budget, adding that last year he Page 21 .~ >;~~I~~~ '~;~ ~i!', l' ,;'" '':,f'' :¡-f: , ~~;~ - - - .. .. .. ,¿;,,;) ,,';¡ ~~ .' (:~ff}:;S ':~\~., , ,~.,~, , ,,!~:.,, February 18, 1986 budgeted $300,000 for this project and since the project did not proceed. that money was carried over ae Reserves so the funds are available. He noted that there were 3 bidders for the land cover ~aterial, on the fertilizer, seed, and mulch and there was a combi- nation and several contractors bid on more than one item, but there was a total of four bidders, bidding on each of the items. He stated that with reference to the bidders on the fencing, he is not eure how many bidders there were, adding that he could check with Staff on this matter. Commissioner Voss stated that the item would be deferred until after lunch, which was agreed. ..... Receser l2rOO P.M. - Reconvenedt lr30 P.M. ..... Public Works Administrator Kuck stated that there were five bids received for the fencing for the Immokalee Landfill. Commi.sioner Voss moved, s.conded by Co.missioner Ra.ee and carried unaniaously, that Bids 86-935, 86-936, and 86-937 be awarded to the various vendors as indicated above in the various quantities and aaounte. Ite. fl4 BID '85-926 FOR '!'RUE 1986 FORD TRAC'l'ORS ABD TWO 1986 BUSH ROO MOWERS FOR PUBLIC WORKS - AWARDED TO CREEL FORD TRAC'l'OR. BID FOa TWO DUMP TRUCKS - REJECTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on December II, 1985, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, bids were received for three tractors, two dump trucks, and two bush hog mowers until 2r30 P.M., December 11, 1985. Public Works Administrator Kuck stated that the objective of item is to award the purchase of Public Works equipment. Re noted Staff recommends the eole bid received for dump trucks be rejected sepcifications be rewritten in order to obtain a better price. He stated that the low bid for the tractors is recommended, without trade-ins as a low, competitive price and the bid from 'Creel Ford i. recommended above the other two bids recp.ived for bush hog mowers, being the only proposal meeting specifications requiring dual, rear support wheels. He noted that the fiscal impact is that money for these purchases has been budgeted and is available in Gas Tax Road Construction Fund 313. He reported that he is recommending that Bid, '85-926 for the three 1986 Ford tractors, at $14,625 each, and the two 1986 bush hog mowers, at $2,598 each, be awarded to Creel Ford Tractor, this that and ".;¡- , . "~ , ...---..... '~.~... ,"'1:'; " ,,!.' ; :!'~ r¡,· ,,' "V\ ~- . -I, Ii> ¡~ 092 p,r,f 250 Page 22 ",......".....,.".""'..,.-..-... ------"""",.-.,. , f' ;;; 092 PA'Æ 251 February 18, 1986 Ft. Myers, and that the bid {~r the dump trucke be reje~ted and rebid at a future date. Commissioner Rasse aoved, eeconded by eommi.sioner Voss .nd carried unanimously; that Bid '8S-926 for three 1986 Ford tractor. at $14,625 each and two 1986 bueh hog mowers at $2,598 e.ch be .warded to Creel Ford Tractors, Ft. Hyer.. Ite. U5 UtŒIfAL LEASE or HODIJLAR WAREHOUSB FROM MARS'l'n LEASING FOR VOTING HACRIN! STORAGE ON A HONTR-TO-HON'l'R BASIS _ APPROVED "1ft , . r PUblic Works Administrator Kuck stated that this ie a recommenda- tion to either renew the lease with Marsten Leasing for the voting machine warehouse or direct Staff to purchaee the warehouse. He etated that the total cost of renewing the lease for an additional one year period is $8,640, adding that in lieu of the lease, Mareten Leasing h.. offered to sell the mobile unit to the County for the eum of $14,900. He stated that he is asking direction from the Board if they prefer to go ahead with the annual lease or whether they would like to purchase the mobile uni t. Commissioner Voss questioned if anyone hae talked with Marsten Leasing regarding a month-to-month le.ee until the warehouse is ready, to which Facilities Manager Camp stated that he was able to work out an agreement on a month-to-month basis which will be $720 . month. Commissioner Hollan" questioned what the projected finish date for, the warehouse is, to which Mr. Camp replied the month of September. eo..iesioner Voss IIOved, seconded by Com.i.eion.r Has.. .nd carried unanillOusly, that the r.new.l 1.... of the modular w.r_hou._ from Marat.n Leaeing for the voting machin. .torag. be don. on . .onth~ to-month basis in the amount of $720 until the warehouse Is re.dy. Ite. U6 PROGRESS REPORT OR COMMUNITY PAJUl:S CONSTRUCTION ABD ALLOCATIOIf PLAN 01' REVENUES AVAILABLE rROM 1982 PARJl:S CIP BOND ISSUE _ A'PROVED Parks & Recreation Director Vanatta stated that this item is two part in nature, the first part to give an update on the etatus of the construction on each of the five community park sitee, and the second part is to obtain Board approval of an allocation plan designed to equitably distribute the balance of the proceeds from the 1982 Park Bond Issue, adding that the tentative plan is to comply with the unanimous vote of the Board back in August, 1984, to divide the money equally five ways among the five community parks. He stated with ,,\. ..' ~(~ .. .. Page 23'; ,,;,;.{ - :~l~"'i"[ ~, '.,~t'\. ~~",', ..~: < ,~. ':. .:~;~ . .-.<, €, "~,.~ ~ " " ·!tC:,--· .'-.. ,~" ~.; ~ I , if", ';.:.~.~:':.'~.:., .. -,.....-..............,,,.,....- ,.....,,;.,,~'.,--,,;_.,....,..-~,'''...,.,'''', - w.-.,__,____,,_-'" ...1 "'.........._-""--~,-""'..., .. .. .. ..j. ; :."." ';, t ~{( t", " , .. February 18, 1986 reference to the Immo~alee Community Par~, Part I of Phase I hae been completed, which entitled some site preparation, all utilitiee brought into the site, providing a par~ing lot and ballfield which has light- ing. He stated that bids for Part II of Phase I were opened on December 2 and December II, 1985 respectively, and awarded at the aeeting of February 4, 1986. He etated that eetimated conetruction time is approximately 6 months, adding that he is anticipating that Harper Brothers, who has the preparation contract, will be able to mobilize within the next 30 days on that site. He noted th~t bids were opened on July 3, 1985, for the Golden Gate site and awarded at the meeting of the Board on September 10, 1985. He stated that construc- tion is currently underway and completion is anticipated for July, 1986. He stated that Harper Brothere also had the eite preparation on this particular park and the wor~ is completed: Mid-Continent has the electrical contract and they are approximately half-way through: and Bunn Construction has the contract for buildings and eheltere and they are mobilizing and should begin this wee~ if weather permits. He indicated that the bid process and opening and award of contracts for the North Naples site was the same as the Golden Gate eite and Harper Brothers, as well, had the site preparation contract on that site and it has been completed. He stated that Mid-Continent wse awarded the electrical contract and they are half-way through and Bun" Construction will be mobilizing on that site within two weeks. He stated that on the Marco Island park, the anticipated bid opening date is scheduled for May, 1986, construction is estimated to begin around August, 1986, and completed around April, 1987. He reported that the anticipated bid opening date for the East Naples site is scheduled for July, 1986, construction is estimated to begin in October, 19A6, and co.pletion in June, 1987. Commissioner Pistor questioned why the bids on the Marco Island park are so slow in being opened, to which Mr. Vanatta stated that this was reviewed at the last design meeting and the consulting engineeraq,.J~).1~li'.;'1;~ are working as fast as they can and they anticipate possibly at the , ,',.. earliest being ready to go in April,'but they are still going for August to begin construction. He stated that he could review this with them, but this is what they are anticipating at this time. Commissioner Pistor stated that he thought bide were ready to go out for the Marco Island park, Mr. Vanatta stated that there were several things that postponed aOOK 092 PA',! 252 Page 24 . " ·':l' __.="',-,w......"',.,..'. ""~"^'''".,,,..'' , c.. ,.._.._.,,___<__.~.;,_ .\: 'I' 092 253 Pebruary 18, 1986 a;~ P1~r ' the efforts, noting that there was the referendum in June, and the re-prioritization of the facilities. Mr. Vanatta noted that th. second part of this agenda item is to obtain Board approval for the allocation plan designed to equitably distribute the balance of the proceeds from the 1982 Park Bond Issue, adding that each site began with $1 million which was prior to the Board voting on $400,000 worth of base elevation work. He stated that each park has $1 mill:on allocated, East Naples has been the recipient of a Land, Water ~ Conservation Pund Grant for approximately $175,000, 'j adding that it was the Board's wiehes to redistribute a proportionate t' share back to the other four parks which shows $34,967 as a plus under each one of the parks and a deficit of $139,868 for the East Naples park on the proposed allocation plan. He reported that to date Immokalee park has spent $392,174, adding that a $50,000 contribution is earmarked for the Golden Gate park. He stated that the pre- construction expenses show $61,010 for impact fees and the baee elevation of $400,000. He reported that the other fees are the engineering contract as well as the inspection fees which are being done in house by the Engineering Department and $20,000 worth of reimbursables that the Board approved in 1985. He etated that the system-wide reserves has been created to allow the interest to accumulate, adding that the intent of this reserve is for Change Ordere and if there is money left at the end of construction, he will return to the Board with recommendations as to how to spend the money. In answer to Commissioner Pistor, Mr. Vanatta stated that interest has accumulated since 1982 and there has been some expendituree on that, adding that they have reached a point where they are in a position to give each park $1 million and when thie happene, the principle will accumulate interest and that will be set aside and redistributed at a later date. Tape '7 ¡ , Co.missioner Voss .oyed~ eeconded by Co..i..ioner Goodnight and carried unanimouSly, that the progress report on the Co.-unity Park. construction and allocation plan of revenues available fro. the 1982 Park. CIP Bond Iesue be approved. Ite. U 7 NEGOTIATIONS or CONTRACT WITH PRC CONSOER TOWNSEND POR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR COUNTY REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSIOø _ APPROVED Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that on OCtober 22, 1985, ;.~ .;.-, : ',".' . - - .. .. ._"----"..".,.,"...,,",'-'"'"""",.,._.,~,-,"'""'"',. -- -----.-...------,.~,--~'''''"''''<~,.".,..._.'''''~"-_. .. - .. February 18, 1986 the Board authorized Staff to form a committee to review proposals from engineering firms to do engineering related servicee for the expansion of the water treatment plant. He stated that the committee met and sent 26 proposals out and 9 proposals were received back and that was then shortlisted to four firms consisting of Boyle Engineering, C.D.M., Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc., and PRC Consoer Townsend. He stated that the shorlist committee met and had presentations from each of the firms and then a number system was used to determine the number one through number four firm. He etated that the firm ranked number one was PRC Consoer Townsend, adding that he is recommending that Staff be authorized to negotiate a contract with that number one firm. Com.iesioner Voss .oved, .econded by Co..ieeioner Goodnight and carried unani.ouely, that the ran~ed ehort-liet of deeign engineers b. approved and that negotiations for a contract with PRC Coneoer Townsend for engineering servicee for the County Regional Water 'l'reat.ent Plant expansion be approved. . :' " '? f .;,:,} ~ ,,1 ~- f-. ~: , ."p', ··"',-:·:~"~l , ,% ." I Ite. ue UTS JUSTICE CENTER PAY PRONE AGREEMENT _ APPROVED Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that at the time the County purchased pay phones for use of prisonere in the new Juetice Center, the County had purchased private telephones and subsequent to that time, the Florida Public Service Commiseion has passed a tarriff on all privately owned pay telephone systems and the new tarriff would have added about $15,000 a year to the telephone bill at the new Sheriff's Department and Jail. He stated that to remedy that particular problem, an arrangement has been worked out whereby United Telephone System will purchase those instruments from the County in return for which the County will no longer be required to pay the annual $15,000 tarriff on these telephones. He stated that he is requesting approval of this and authorization for the Chair.an to execute the agreement between the County and United Telephone. I Commissioner Voss questioned if th6Y will also maintain the telephones, to which Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that as part of that agreement, they will be re3ponsible for maintaining those instruments as if they had owned them. Co..iseioner Voss .oved, seconded by Coaaie.ioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that the UTS Justice Center Pay Phone agree.ent be approved. ¡, r, -.. 1;', f ,;..,~': "{' &OO~ 092 PJr,! 254 Page 26 ~ ,," , ,''¡;.. .. ~ . """"'~~~'_·""o"~,,,,·~;"~,,, "'<."~"~'_"'<''''''''_'''''"'_ ¡~"'"'''---'Þ'''-''''''-'''""''''"'''''"-",.,>.",.-,. _'_'''''''"''__'''''''''_'''' ·".._"'".....,-,..'.._.~_..',,,.."""',"""_.., . I:' , .,.." r &OM 092,.<),257 Itea U9 FebruAry 18, 1986 COMMODITY STANDARDS FOR IlITERIOR l'URRISflIIrGS ABD ßGOTIATIONS TO PROCURE FURNISRINGS UNDER A PURCHASING AGREEHEN'1' FOR A PERIOD OP TAO YEARS AND TO BE BROUGH'!' BACK TO THE BCC - APPROVED Facilities Manager Camp stated that it is Staff's desire to accumulate open office furniture that is compatible with a previously purchased furniture system that is now in the Board office, the Legal Department, and Utilities. He stated that it is also the County'. desire to standardize the furniture system so that reconfiguration of .), 1.t.W or existing offices can be accomplished expeditiously using the " eKisting furniture supplementing with new purchases. rie etated that after studying the cost savings of other County governments, it hae been det~rmined that substantial savings up to and over SO\ of liet price can be saved if the County enters into a purchasing agreement with a single manufacturer for a certain period of time which would be 11",. two years. He stated that the recommendation is that Staff standardize .,'. the purchases of open office furniture: that departments under the Board coordinate with the Facilities Manager and the Purchaeing Director all purchases of open office furniture: that Staff negotiate an agreement to purchase Steel Case ope~ office furniture, that this agreement be for a period of two years; and that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign an open office purchase agreement. Commissioner Voss questioned how much of a discount the County received previously, to which Mr. Camp replied 30-35\, adding that he feels that they should get 50-51\ discount to include shipping, installation, and design. Commissioner Voss stated that he feels that it is a good idea that the furniture is standardized, but he would like to be assured that this is the most economical way to go in the long-run. Mr. Camp stated that the architects studied all systeme available and they came up with the top three manufacturers that woulð fill the County's needs and for the past two year~ the County has made a commitment to the particular product, Steel Case, adding that they have a lot of benefits that the others do not have, such as they provide a life-time warranty on their product and they have a local dealer. County Manager Lusk questioned if the agreement was going to be brought back to the Commission, to which Mr. Camp stated that he wants to negotiate with the best dealer in the State and he will bring it back if the Board would like. Page 27' > \ ' - - - ... .. ;1;'; ,-..' ., ',. . ..,...,....'J>-. ~'~:.:.'::~ -.",... 4' ;1', - - .. ,'1 ~"" ,~ ~ ~"I'i1 ~,~ .' ~~, ~'~,~7~~; , <,,!,'J .~,~,. .. :/ffl \, ,1;' .-;: ;<1 "(~, '. February 18, 1986 Commissioner Holland stated that he wae under the impreesion that the Constitutional Officers could use this particular product if they liked, but it was not mandatory. Mr. Camp øtated that thie agree~ent would be just for the departments under the Board, but any Constitutional Officer ,could utilize this purchase agreement if they wish. ~sslstant County Manager Dorrill etated that in the peet the Board has purchased furniture for the Constitutional Officers, but the recommendation Is that only departments under the Board coordinate and be required to purchase furniture through the Purchasing Director and the Facilities Manager. COllllissioner Goodnight .oyed, .econded by COlllli..ioner Voes and carried unanillOuely, that the comllOdity .tandard. for interior furnishings and negotiation. to procure furnishing. under a purcha.ing agreement for a poriod of two years be approved and brought bact to the Board prior to execution of eaid agreement. It.. '20 f.jY?"l' f '''''" " ROUTINE BILLS - APP~JED FOR PAYMENT Pursuant to Resolution 81-150, the following checke were iesued through Friday, February 14, 1986, in payment of routine billsr CHECK DESCRIPTION CHECK NOS. AMOUNT Vendors 139333 - 139595 $1,147,817 .97 Ite. '21 BUDGET AMENDMENTS 86-154, 15e; 160; 161; 163 , 164 " 1-, () . ~,ì t . .., ...~ ....... ",/. ~\, ADOP'l'ED ',I ~ Commissioner Goodnight .oved, .econded by Coaai..ioner Vo.. and carried unaniaouely, that Budget Amendment. 86-154; 158; 160; 161; and 164 be adopted. Commissioner Pistor questioned what Budget Amendment 86-163 Ileana .'""~~; with regards to trash relloval never being budgeted in 1985-861 J He ',", ' :~::.:.::.~.:~ ~::::::.:.:~:.':.~;.:; ~:::: :::.:::X:;C::;u~:;:;;,·,r,~",'j',i.~",~,}~,:.~,~I:~ maintenance suppl ies. " ", ,'"1 . PI 0;: ' '1 -f~ ''''~ . ""t:t':: ~i Fiscal Officer Giles etated that thie was requeet.~ by '~e'l¡ . , 'U~'f::;~' j Raines and approved by SJtip Camp. ' 'i 7',' .~\"~ ;~;~;; Commissioner Pistor state~ that it refers to things that were normally purchased out of maintenance repair fund. which were rejected by the auditor. &GOK 092 p~r,! 258 Page 28 .':,,. ._...,.,._",----""",.,.."...",."",.,.~.,~"',,... ..,">..,~~,~-..'-.... .", ~ ....-----,.-"""'----,...._.._._"__.",.............,''''''.',,.,,.,~.~,·_4..'"._'''"'__' ,.... ~, ,...., .. '/.( ',' J "J ;..·t 092 WI. 259 February 18, 1986 Facilities Manager Camp .tated that these are ju.t line items and they are the same appropriatione, adding that it ie changing expendi- tures within an appropriation. He stated that it was put on the wrong line item and the auditors are going to switch the line item. Fiscal Officer Giles stated that a $10,000 increase in machinery and equipment is being requested, adding that the auditor's comment is probably that this is capital outlay and cannot be charged as an operating expense since it ie parking lot lights on Marco ISland, adding that~they are ta~ing the bulk of the money from the building repairs and maintenance account. He etated that what was rejected by the auditor is that it is being charged to operating expenee, there- fore, a budget amendment had to be done to charge it to capital outlay. County Manager LUSK stated that the way it was set up was wrong and the auditors are si~ply switching it to make it right. co..i.sioner Goodnight aoved, seconded by Coaais.ioner Voss and carried unaniaously, that Budget Amend.ent 86-163 be adopted. Ite. '22 '00'1: COMMISSIONERS ROLLAND, HASSE AND PISTOR APPOINTED TO '1'RE MPO _ APPROVED Administrative Secretary to the Board Filson slated that the terms of all MPO members will expire on March 29, 1986, and by interlocal agreement with the City of Naples, the District 4 Commissioner must be one of the three Commissioners appointed by the Board to serve on the MPO. She stated that there are no other restrictions or limitations, but currently the Commissioners serving are Commissioners HOlland, Voie and Hasse. She stated that it hae to be determined who will be on the MPO this year. Commissioner Voss stated that he thinks the Chairman should be on the MPO. Commissioner Voss .oved, seconded by eo..issioner Haese and carried unanimously, that Co.miseionere Holland, Rasse and Pistor be appointed to the MPO. Ite. .23 DISCUSSION RE CLAM PASS BOARDWALK - CONTINUED FOR ON! WEEK Commissioner Holland stated that there was a lot of discussion regarding the boardwalk and invariably the Commission gets sidetracked and something else comes up, adding that it was his underetanding that the Fiscal Officer was authorized to see how much money could be obtained from the overage of the pari-mutuel taxes, adding that it was Page 29 - - .. .".-...,..._..,--".._~. --- ........-.,......".--."""''''.........-....---......".,.,,'' '·'\>4' "I,;I"~~, !~ ~"" " . ~~'t1. .1, - - - February 18, 1986 around $580.000 that could be obtained. He stated that there is $332.912 in the Capital Improvement Fund, and there ie also money left in the Macilvane settlement that could be transferred into thie project in order to get the boardwalk built. Co..issioner Rolland DOved, s.conded by Co..is.ioner H....~ th.t the .oney that is available as referenced above~ be ueed along with the $580,000 race tax funds to go to bid for the boardw.lk a. soon a. possible to make it a reality. Commissioner Voss stated that it was discussed with regards to using the race track money for this purpose, but there are a lot of things that money is needed for, adding that one thing is the court facility building that has to be built. He stated that he places a high priority on beach access. but the overall cost needs to be looked at with regards to the facility for the judges. Commissioner Holland stated that there will probably be more money needed for the judges. but Clam Pass Park has been the property of the County for years with no access to the public whatsoever. He stated e.at there are a lot of people that have different ideae about how this can be acco~plished and rather than compromise the position, he was of the opinion that the $580,000 was earmarked for the boardwalk and he would like to see it built. He stated that there ie not enough public access or public beach. but the quicker it can be accompli.hed, the better off everyone will be. He stated that the money that is avail- able in beach improvement and the $332,000 in the capital improvement and the $100.000 in contingency, total over $1 million. Commissioner Voss stated that there is about $105,000 left from the Naples Cay settlement, $332,000 in capital improvements for Clam Pass Park this year, and $580.000 from the race tax fund. which equals a little over a million dollars. Commissioner Holland stated that there ie etill obligations from Shelter Corporation and from Westinghouse in addition to thi.. Commissioner Voss stated that the County may be short about a half million dollars and Westinghouse may be able to come up ,with $100,000 which leaves $400,000 short. ~;!""¡.:, County Attorney Saunders stated that Shelter aeagat. Corporation had an obligation to donate to the County the cash equivalent of the two docks and one boat, adding that he has heard number. varying from $60,000 to $150,000 for the value of that contribution. He .tated that Westinghouse has no monetary obligations to the County. ';~: "' 'J.'-" 1..J. ; ",I' ¡.~: .''''. . .'~.; .!;'ì: ,. ;;,~; 092 PA~[ 260 Page 30 ,'."", ~" -.,... 1",",3, , ~'\ f: ~"\, r'· :~r" '~~~,.'. ''!,{ " ;':'~¡1'i h".,. '., " , .~.,.·~t ~: ' '). ~ ~ " " ;] "( "/' .....,","'-'.......""",..."'" "'.4~"'..",~".,. ,~.._"'~~<____.,,_..' r , I ao~ 092 P~'·í 261 " February 18, 1986 Commissioner Pistor questioned if they still have that obligation if they decide to use the Pelican Bay beach instead of the Clam Pase beach for the Registry Hotel? County Attorney Saunders stated that they have long as they are able to complete the facilities by unless an extension to the agreement ie made. In answer to Commissioner Pistor, Public Worke Administrator Kuck -I) stated that he has estimated that construction will coet eomewhere between $l.l million and $1.2 million, adding that plane are almost complete and he would be in a position to go out for bide. Commissioner Pistor questioned what will happen if they decide not to build the facilities on the beach because they did not get the concession agreement to have alcohol on the beach, to which County Attorney Saunders stated that they have the obligation to build the beachside facilities, to build the parking lot, and to make the caeh contribution regardless of the sale of alcohol. Commissioner Hasse stated that it is imperative that the County move forward on this boardwalk immediately. Commissioner Voss stated that the amount of money that Shelter Corporation is willing to give needs to be firmed up before anything should be done. the obligation ao October 1, 1986, . County Attorney Saundere stated that after the sale of alcoholic beverages was rejected by the Board, Mr. Aaron indicated that he would contact the County with regards to what the hotel would be willing to do in addition to the original Beach Accese Facilitiee Agreement, adding that he has not made contact to determine this ae yet. He stated that he needs a few days to meet with Mr. Aaron to see if the hotel is willing to do anything in addition to the agreement. Commissioner Holland stated that there is no access to the park at this time, and there is IIOney available at this time to build the boardwalk. Tape '8 County Attorney Saunders stated that the hotel recognizes that the Commission ie not going to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages on the beach and therefore, this is a dead iseue and the hotel recognize. that. He stated that the hotel also recognizes that the County is sho~t of funds to build the boardwalk and the next level of inquiry with the hotel is that they need the boardwalk and the COQnty needs the boardwalk and is the hotel willing to provide more than what i. Page 31 - - - .. ,,.. . ," , ... ( '~ , , OJ '. \"~. ~:;~.¡; P\~, .. ,\1~1~ , ,r , '-'^'-'~-"""'~_""~"".__"'...___>..c,."..,.".......,,, .. .. .. " February 18, 1986 co~tained in the Beach Access Facilities Agree~ent as their contri- bution? He stated that he does not know the answer to this question at this time, but hopefully, he will be able to settle the matter this wee)¡;. Commissioner Goodnight stated that she feels that if the Commission takes a stand and says that they are interested in going out for bids and want to proceed. then if there is not enough money it could be stopped at that time, The following people spoke in favor of going ahead with the boardwal)¡;, citing the need for the boardwal)¡; and the access for the public David Bennett Jackie Burel George !teller County Manager Lusk stated that one of his concerns with regard to, the pari-mutuel money is the new courthouse, adding that tho lowest estimates that have been received is a little over $4 million. He stated that with the existing Justice Center bonds, there is $1.2 million for that facility and by issuing additional bonds, he can come up with another $2.7 million which gives hi. $3.9 million for a courthouse, with the lo~est estimate of $4 million. He stated that he has been looking at the pari-mutuel taxes for this, adding that he has concern if it is used for Clam Pass. Commissioner Pistor stated that if the additional money is borrowed immediately, it could be earning interest which may be enough to handle the boardwal)¡;. Commissioner Holland stated that this commiesion voted on using that money for Clam Pass and this is what it is supposed to be used for. County l1anager Lusk stated that he is concerned that ta)¡;en to go forward with the project, it will indicate to ,that the County is giving up their bargaining chip and he one week would be too much to wait? Commissioner Voss stated that he doee not feel that enough ~oney to build the facility for the judgee if the ^ used for the boardwalk. if action is the hotel questioned , ';"{'" 1,f ''J./ .;" .., I." , ; ;.1(;"..: ~ . ~~ there will b~,~~,; ;.; $580,000 is :: ,~~ ";' . ~ ,¡. ~. "?~'.'. ~~~~ Fiscal Officer Giles stated that the report as of :December 31, 1985, shows on the Justice Center Fund a balance of $2.4 million and ,:Ht. there was $4 million added a year ago May and in Fund 302, there is " '" ' another $750,000 from 9uilding "A", adding that he does not know how aoO!( 092 par,! 262 Page 32 !. :.:'l.~': ._,.._¡,..~~:~-~ " I "',¿,"'.Ç¡.; 'l'r,' ,,',<,,''10 :~~ '.'1.:."..' _, . . .- ....._,~ ,.. '_-...._..._~-~-.,-""..-..,-',;.-<..-<'<."....,~"...,....-,,.." '4' " 092p~'-!263 February 18, 1986 thia lines up with the cost to compiete the whole courthoue.. Commissioner Holland stated that the money that ie allocated for the 8th floor could be used to build the judges' chamb*rs. County Manager Lusk stated that if he does not finish the 8th floor, he will nQt have any place to move people while other buildinga are being finished. He stated that there ia a shortfall because the project went from $1.2 million to $4 million. Commissioner Holland stated that if the County Manager and his staff felt that the money was needed for the courthouse a few weeka ago, when the action was taken to use it for the boardwalk, why waa it not mentioned at that time? County Manager Lusk stated that it should have been mentioned at that time, which was his mistake. Commissioner Goodnight questioned if Commissioner Holland would be willing to wait one more week for a decision from the hotel? Commissioner Holland stated that he haa objection to putting this off ,for another week, but he will agree to it. Mr, John Cashel questioned if the Commission has made any type of a survef regarding whether or not the people of the County intend to use it, if it is feasible to put it up, and if the people even want it? He stated that the County should not overspend if they do not have the money. Co..iesioner Holland withdrew the aotion, .nd Co..i..ioner R.... withdrew his second until next week. Commissioner Pistor directed County Manager Luek and County Attorney Saunders to have the needed information by Friday ao that this item will be put on the agenda for next week. It.. '24 &OM DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED APPLICATION FOR REZONING ON GOLDEN GAT! PARKWAY - TO BE BROUGHT BACK WITH SITE PLAN POR ALL 54 LOTS Mr. David Graham, Chairman of Golden Gate Parkway Rezoning Committee, referred to a map indicating that he would like 54 lote on Golden Gate Parkway rezoned from RMF-12 to a local commercial zoning. He stated that about a year and half ago, he was approached by people that own lots on t~e Parkway to see if it could be changed from multi-family zoning to commercial zoning because the community of Golden Gate does not want to see the main street in town become a slum. He stated that they do not want to see the multi-family houeing generate any further and they do not want to see new multi-family Page 33 J, r::: - .'.J~},: ~ _ :i-~,,,', It~... ~:~~ " - - ...._.... "«.I'"~ II"" ._..... _"'____,...-,..._".'_,._--...,;.~..,<...._,_"" .. .. .. .. " February 18, 1986 housing put up that is going to be an eyesore. He noted that he met with as many lots owners as possible and they have all been contacted. He stated that he is asking for the area to be rezoned light co~- merical. He stated that the population in Golden Gate will support ~ore commercial and according to the U.S. Postal Service the population is around 19,000. He stated that there ie only 117 acres of commercial in the entity of Golden Gate to cover over 190 square miles of land, which is less than a half acre of commercial per square mile of land. He stated that in this area there are only three multi-family structures that will be affected and could probably be converted very inexpensively, He stated that in order to make this work, he would like to see the Board set up as the original architectual review board for this area, noting that when the first building comes up, the Board will set everythinq for the building and everything that follows will have to conform to the first building, uniform setback, uniform architecture, and landscaping conformance. He stated that there is going to be about $92,000 a year spent for the next 10 or 12 years on beautifying Golden Gate Parkway and if the road is lined with duplexes who cares what the median will look like? He stated that the Parkway Rezone Committee is made up of businessmen, civic leaders, lot owners, and people that are interested in having the best town that is available. He noted that Santa Barbara Squ^re is up and working and the people feel good about it, and there is a need for additional commercial like this. He stated that this area will not hold tenants because of the traffic on the parkway and the owners have to put more money into the apartments then what they can get out of them and in order to keep tenants on the Parkway, the rent is coneietently being lowered. In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Graham stated that the lots are 125' deep and the parkin9 could be done by rear entry which could be controlled at this time. '... ·f ,.',;,.,,", He stated thftt he wants the Board to pass a aechanie. so that there will not be duplexes on the main street of Golden Gatê City. .,. noted that staff indicated to him that they did not want to discuss the eituation. ~f'l-' ',':.J) . ,_ . .... ,; I.: Planning/Zoning Director Pettrow stated that there ie'nothing in the ordinance that would allow for this commercial zoninq~ adding thÁt; a maximum commercial node would be up to 8 acres and this exceeds that amount by II acres. He stated that there is no plan for the area, and . "ii'J ,'f~ ,(f) Î.1 '1·$-:.~1',;:";~ :"!.."r';, :,..~ Re ., (-I. , . :',\I¡: ~~,\ ,~ ;t-" ;)' .~ ;;; 092 w.: 264 Page 34 !';:fi' ,. l:,:/': I,,-'~ :'r .it , ",,' ~'''''4. "f' ~ ·r.~rf:f:, ',,;.;~: '¿;~M~~~ "1'~~ .l{' -_..~,-,_......~,-_..----- -"'--...,..-,--..........._."."';--~ . '~f, I - " , . f 092w'f265 February 18, 1986 they are probably talking about developing between now and the next five years, adding that when they are ready to develop that is the time to come in. He stated that it does not .eet the zoning requirements or the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that there are other uees for the property under RMF-12 to be explored, adding that there is recreational facilities, civic and cultural facilities, churchee, private echools, rehab centers, and many more. He stated that Golden Gate Parkway is a busy road and only going to get busier. Commissioner Hasse stated that thie property is ineufficient in size to provide adequate parking, adding that Mr. Graham neede to come ,', back with a site plan for the entire area. Commissioner Holland ståted that he can eee trying to make something decent for Golden Gate, but it should not be multi-family, adding that the planning should be reviewed. Mr. Graham stated that he is asking for some help in solving the problem as multi-family is not going to work. Commissioner Pistor stated that if Mr. Graham wante to come back with a site plan for the whole area, they will be glad to give further thought to the matter, but before anything can be diecuss.d with staff, the Commission needs to have a plan that is feasible. Mr. Graham stated that he would be back next week with a site plan for all 54 lots. Mr. George Keller stated that the Comprehensive Plan cannot be changed and he does not think that anything should be done on it. Commissioner Pistor stated that the Comprehensive Plan i. not being changed and nothing is being done at this time, ae Mr. Graham has to come back with a plan for all 54 lot. before the Commie.ion can discuss it further. Itell .25 &O~ PRESENTATION OF MASTER PLAN FOR WATER HABAGEMENT DISTRIC'l' 6 - NO AC'l'ION Mr. Fred Vidzes, Executive Director of SFWMD, stated that this item concerns the water management plan update for District 6, adding that the Big Cypress Basin Board commissioned an engineering firm to prepare this plan in 1983. He stated that the Basin Board adopted a resolution recommending that the Board accept the plan and take certain steps to alleviate the flooding problems in Lely Estates. He stated that in 1974, the Board had a water management plan prepared for District 6 that was done by Black, Crow & Eidsness, noting that for about 8 or 9 years the County operated on that plan and the Basin felt Page 35 - _ ~ .<.¡t~,·~" ~f~~'!"~;' ~i:j,~:"" .;,,~ ' " . :~~-¡ ,. .. \;> .,.. . ,'"f., r", - .. - ~ - February 18, 1986 that it WðS time to begin looking at the some of the problems that have been occurring in District 6 ðnd to look forward to the future as to what needed to be done in the area from a standpoint of water managment to allow the orderly development of that are3. He stated that the plan that is being presented is merely a plan, a road map, a guide that c~n be used by the Engineering Department, the PUblic Works Department, the public. and by the landowners in that area. He stated that there were several recommendations made in the study to try and alleviate the problems thðt ðre occurring in the area. He reported that the existing chðnnel, the Lely outfall canal, has been determined to be inadequate, adding that it is unable to receive or convey the large flows that it receives during period of high rainfall without causing highwater levels upstream of U.S. 41. He stated that in the absence of a water control structure at its discharge point in the estuaries, it results in over-drðinage during the dry seðson. He stated that portions of the Lely Canal within Lely Estates Subdivision are so shallow in depth that they are difficult to maintain properly and improvements are needed within that areð. He stated that the culvert crossing the canal at Doral Circle causes significant increases in water levels during major storms and replacement of the ~rossing would improve the situation, providing a better water management system for that area, He stated that there is also a pile-supported utility crossing located in the Lely Canal at Country Club Manor Condo which obstructs flow by collecting debris and increases the difficulty of channel maintenance and these crossings should be replaced by sub-aqueous or subterranean crossings. He stated that there are several other recommendations in the report. adding that the tot~l package or cost of improvemente to the area comes to about $10 million which includes the entire District 6 which covers from Radio Road down to Rookery Bay area and from S.R. 951 to the City limits. He stated that this will probably take five, ten or fifteen years to undertake those improvements, adding that it is l' , , ; . '.~ . ,1 ~,..¡;, ~ understðnding that the Water Management Director has prepared a five ,;,:>;..;,~~::, ,. . year capital improvement plan that addresses the neede for water , '·'.¡'1:' management District 6 and also defines the specific needs for the Lely ),; W area. He stated that, in essence, the Big Cypress Basin Board has ~,~ given the Board a plan that can be used in addressing the future growth! problems of the District 6 area and will enable the staff to get a better handle on future development in the area and will allow developers a better insight as to what is expected of them at the time aoo'K 092 PIC.[ 266 Page 36 ~ -,~._~ -........- ,,··f 100.; n92 P)'r ?~7 February 18, 1986 ~ey b~91~ their developments and their planning efforte and hopefully, in the long term, will have an orderly method of water Management in the District 6 area. Commissioner Pistor questioned if widening the canals could increase the tidal flow and cause more flooding, to which Mr. Vidzes stated that on about every ~ajor outfall canal, there is a water control structure that acts as a salinity barrier and that structure serves two purposes, one is to prevent the upstream movement of tide waters to reduce the threat of saltwater intrusion and secondly, to ~aintain high water levels during the dry season eo there is not a drainage problem. Mr. vidzes stated that if a major coveyance eyetem is dug for an outfall and there is no control on it, the water will back up which is something that needs to be prevented and is part of the recommendations in the plan that at the downstream end of all outfalls, there should be some type of structure to prevent that inflow of tidewater and saltwater. He stated that the particular control for the Lely canal would be located approxi~ately I to 1-1/2 miles toward the terminus of the outfall and the o11tfall itself would be connected to a spreader swale system to allow the water that is being drained out to spread across the very bottom of the crossing. Commissioner Pistor stated that it would then be a salinity barrier so that the water would not come back, but it would go out, and Mr. Vidzes replied affirmatively. Mr. Vidzes referred to a ~ap indicating the proposed improvements and the boundaries of the District 6 area. He stated that the most important feature of the plan is the divieion of th. area into sub-watersheds and the area that is eerved by the Lely outfall canal being the most important of the sub-watershede. He stated that the present canal runs from Rattlesnake Hammock Road southwesterly into the tidewater areas and he is proposing that this outfall canal be improved. adding that it needs to be improved and if it is not done, then anything that is done upstream is useless. He stated that near the outfall end of the canal, a water control structure would be constr~cted at that point to prevent inflow of tidewater areae and also maintenance of the freshwater back of it to prevent saltwater intrusion, He stated that ~long the edge of the estuary, the interface between the fresh and brakish ,water area would be constructed a spreader waterway, adding that it is his understanding that those plans are presently on the drawing boards and they should be coming before Page 37 .. .. - --- ,'>:, ~J~: . t·~:,." ;ii", ' t~,_··· .....; .."r' - - - "",'~ : ~ ;', -: February 18, 1986 the Board in the near future. He stated that towarð the southeast a similar type spreader waterway would be constructed with the water courses coming from Naples Manor and some of the other areas which will be tied into that to allow the disbursement of freshwater through the entire estuary. Tape no Commissioner Pistor questioned if there has been any agreement with the property owners in the area, to which Mr. Vidzes stated that when they were in the preparation of the plan, he worked very closely with the owners of the property to make sure that what is being proposed is not going to go against their plans and also to make sure that their plans would not be against the current land development and water management regulations. He stated that there is a gentleman's understanding that these improvements will be made, adðing that how the cost will be allocated between the County an~ the developer is something that the County will have to discuss with the developer. He noted that lhe planning is purely conceptual, but everybody is in agreement that these things have to be done. Mr. High Winton Hamill stated that if the Lely project is as efficient as the one at Henderson Creek, he feels sorry for the people of Lely. He stated that there were permit problems at Henderson Creek when the structure was put up, adding that the specifications that the Corp of Engineers gave to have the gate open during the rainy season was ignored. He reported that it was determinel by an engi- neering firm that the weir should be lowered from 5 to 2-1/2 feet and that was never done, adding that SFWMD stated that the land slopes slowly to the west where the water is drained into Henderson Creek. He stated that in 1981, there was a structure built at Henderson Creek which stopped all waterflow from the north and a culvert was con- structed in the Route 41 drainage canal and since that time, the area has been flooded three times, the culvert removed and rebuilt, and \ '.Þ('u'!. '.... removed again. He stated that, in addition, the SFWMD shows in their .. 'illtl I" maps that the flooded area on the north side of U.S. 41 ie five'to ~-r ,...., :' eight feet above mean high tide while the one to four foot on the south ' . ~ '.". . side of U.S 41 above mean high tide has very little flooding. He l';' stated that he would like some answers to these problems. Public WorKs Administrator Kuck stated that during the rainy season in the last few years, the gates have always been open. He stated that the gate was prcp~Jed open. zoo,; 092 PA'A 268 Page 38 J.:,,;~, ~;,~;~, :. . Jj'" :,;.. ~, :~. ...' ,- ~, , ...." .' '_: ~~i\.. ,~~ ,.:.,.:.;1'.""1.....,; ')M~ ", " ., ~~ -<i7_'tI?" __""""""''''''''''''.""'''''''''__",~__O''''"'''",'''''_''' ...",.~"""".".o<~,,,,,,,,,__,,~ , f '..f! &OOK 092 plr,r 269 February 18, 1986 Water Management Director Boldt stated that the problem with the gate com",s up cc.ntinur1lI"Jly, adding that as one stands in the road and looks at the structure, there are three components: a fifty-foot wide concrete sill at elevation five, a 12 foot wide gate that goes up and down and closes which is at elevation 3.5 feet and has alwaye been open, and the third part, which cannot be seen and control. the flow, is a 4 foot by 4 foot slide gate that slides up and down and is controlled by the wheel on top and that is the gate that ie always opened up ðuring every rainy season. He stated that looking at this from the front, a flap gate is seen according to water flow which is meant to stop the water from going back when there are high tides and the water level on the upstream is lower. He stated that he personally opens that gate, adding that the flap gate doee not control the flow and it hinders it somewhat and it has been chained up out of the way. In answer to Commissioner Pistor, Mr. Boldt etated that there are plans to install a lifting device, a davit that can be cranked up out of the way in order to be more responsive. Mr. Dale Manning stated that the tide does not flow into the Lely canal, adding that it flows all along the entire area. He stated that the Tamiami Trail was built at the edge of the tidal basin, and when there is a storm Lely Subdivision gets flooded. He etated that he cannot see how the weir that is proposed to be built can hold the tide out. He noted that the weir that is to assist Henderson Creek will not help if the area around it is developed and not enough lakes are put in to hold the surface water, adding that the water will then go over the weir and there will still be a problem with flooding. He stated that as far as Lely is concerned, it will divert the water along the U.S. 41 canal and the water will flow into Lely Subdivision. He stated that water is received from above because of developers that are developing the small tracts of land and have not provided any reservoirs or lakes. He noted that any time there is a storm of any intensity at all, Lely Subdivision is flooded. He stated that the people that have already developed and have been there for years are the ones that should be taken care of, He noted that the sanitary sewers in Lely Subdivision fill up when the rest of Lely gets flooded and then there is raw sewage flowing in the streets, which is not a very sanitary condition. Mr. Vidzes stated that on any uncontrolled canal or water course, there will be a tidal effect anywhere from a mile to two Ðiles upstream depending on the height of the tide. He stated that the Basin Board "., Page 39 - - - ," ~, .....'. . ....... ~~ .' ~ M. J .t:}.if';':' , ~., '~,:.ra"i J~Þ1\~ . '. .,.~. - - - " February 18, 1986 has provided the Board with a plan that can be implemented to alleviate some of these problems, adding that flooding will not be eliminated 100' in the low lyinq areas that were developed before the current regulations were imposed upon developers. He stated that the amount of time that the areas will be impacted by high water can be reduced and the amount of high water can aleo be reduced. He stated that the Lely area is below the 100 year flood elevation and they will be stuck with flooding and there is nothing that can be done except to dike it off and pump it out. Commissioner Pistor questioned if the Tower Road weir is kept open, to which Public works Administrator Ruck replied affirmatively, adding that no problems have been encountered on that particular structure. He stated that when the Storm "Bob" came through, the survey crew took water elevations at the Lely Bridge at the canal which were around 6.7' or 6.8' and there are streets in Lely Subdivision that are 5.8'. Mr. Manning stated that as far as the incoming tide, Lely Subdivision will pro~ably have to live with that, but the surplus water can be stopped by not permitting developers to develop all the land by making them have reservoirs and lakes to retain that water. Mr. Vidzes stated that the most urgent areas have been identified and the cure has been identified and it is not simply implementing the recommendations. He stated that the Basin Board is not in the position financially to undertake any major capital improvements to improve drainage. He stated that he does not feel that there is any type of public funds available for these types of cures as the State views this has a very isolated small area, but to the people that live there it is a big problem. He stated, therefore, that as far as State or Federal participation, there is none, adding that it is going t~ have to come from the people that live in the area and the County which iø something that the Board is going to have to solve. He stated that the indi- vidual developme~t8 that are coming on line are going to have to ~~ke a contribution toward those improvements, adding that the cure for the problems that already exist is somethin~ that the Board has to fac~: Commissioner Pistor questioned how much of the problem is caused by the water coming from the north part of the area, to which Mr. vidzes stated that under the current regulatory etandards, it requires that the post development run-off shall not exceed pre-development run-off SO the controls are there. He noted that the Water Management BOOK 092 PI'.( 270 Page 40 '; t " JlI''' , .... (,ú-,·...'~- ; I UOI( 092PJ',¡271 February 18, 1986 Director has prepared a five year capital improvement plan that will be submitted to the Board in the near future and eteps should be taken tow~rd considering how to fund certain segments or elements of that capital improvement plan. Water Management Director Boldt stated that he ie going to appear before the Blue Ribbon Committee to present his five year plan and then he will be bringing it before the Board. Commissioner Holland stated that there are two major developments, ?ne on each side of U.S. 41 and asked if the County could negotiate some type of arrangement to poseibly build two massive lakes, would this solve part of the problem? Mr. vidzes stated that this could help, adding that a larger retention storage area could reduce some of the problems. Commissioner Pistor stated that Commieeioner Holland's suggestion is a good one and the Board should talk with the developers eouth of u.s. 41 to see if something can be done. Mr. Manning stated that the water in the canal north of Rattle- snaKe HammocK Road does not all come from the tide, adding that everyone is responsible for their own surface water. He stated that when the tide recedes the water runs out of Lely and then the water could be let in from above and weire ehould be put in to hold the water out of Lely Subdivision. He stated that they are getting to the point legally about accepting someone else's water. Tape nl Commissioner Pistor stated that Mr. Boldt will try and get something together to help alleviate the problem and come back to the Board in four weeks. : ~ .".','", " . *** Co..isioner Vo.s DOved, seconded by co..issioner Goodnight and carried unaniaouely, that the following ite.e under the Consent agenda be adopted and/or approved. ***** It.. '26 SATISFACTIONS OF LIEN TO 8. ROWBOTRAH, DALE R. BACH ABD THOMAS WILLIAMS See Pag88 n1 7.5" -eX 77 Ite. '27 RESOLtTl'ION 86-27 AtTl'HORIZING AHENDE1'I CONTRACT WITH AB2H'1' CORStJLTAN'l'S; INC. RE ASSESSMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT See Pag88 d, 7 f~ d.f:3 Page.41 . ...... V' ;'_~\,;.,;, . , :'>\[10';'1., , 1~,',."4'I;,"\':, " " .J,' ,." ...t"'"'f ~¡;. ""L'"" '~:~ 8.' 'I, ,..., \*~'f,,:, ' ~i;, '~~ :' " , . - - - - '~¡¡. ",..."-",------~"~~;....~-'.".."""',"..,,,..~..,,...',,".,,~,;,--- ~r>n1'"¡i!Ii..._.__ '., ,. - - ·-,~'!ttt 'i.f,?¡;¡,',~,'~ . ·~1 i& _'41 '!'-f/'::) _''I'" ", ~:,t~ ...: _ J :~~ .. :I¡ ,~, '''':,¡..'!'1} ..' $.' " February 18, 1986 Ite. '28 RESOLUTION 86-28 SUPPORTING COHMITMEN'l' OF COLLIER COtnn'Y TO PROVIDE SAPE, DECENT HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES POR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES See Pages a.. r.¡t -.;;, j!j- Ite. .29 RESOLUTION 86-29 AUTHORIZING THE NATURAL RESOURCES HABAGEMENT DEPT. TO APPLY FOR A COASTAL ZONE HABAGEMENT GRANT See Pagel.c2?t -dR'/ It.. '30 BUDGET AHEl'fDMENT TRANSFERRING REVElroES PROM PUIIrD 310 ROAD C01(S'l'RVCTIOR - STATE BONDS 1978 TO FUND 313 - ROAD CONSTRUCTION 5 . 6 CElf'l' GAS TAX Ite. t J1 RESOLUTION 86-30 APPOINTING AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OP PUBLIC WOR~S DIV. TO EXECUTE DOCUM~NTS PERTAINING TO PURCHASE OP ROAD R.O.W. EASEMENTS , PROPERTY FOR ~UBLIC WORKS ACTIVITIES (AMEIIDING R-82-l28) See pagu.;? ¡;r -r-:) ?f' It..'32 EXCAVATION PERMIT NO. 59.234, NAPLES LANDPILL - SUBJECT '1'0 STI'ULATIORS I. Detailed site drainage plans shall be submitted to the County Engineer for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by the County Engineer and S.F.~.M.D. 2. The excavations shall be limited to a bottom elevation of -9.2 ft. ngvd. All disturbed areas proposed for lake excavation shall be excavated to a minimum elevation of 0.0 ft. ngvd. 3. No excav~ted material shall be removed from the project site. 4. Off-site discharge of only through approved treatment approved by groundwater during conetruction shall be i~ discharge etructures after water quality:. _ the COunty Engineer. , ,-' ',-''7 :rr:"t¡:- _. ,-~/i;.'1 ., " " " 'J1.~_., ,..t.~ },t' . ;'~I)tJ.~, ~ " :.'an-.. '; ·L ~~~ 1) EARLY PAYMENT TO DELTONA UTILITIES OF TBB MARCO ISLAND PHASB I FORCE :-"¡'~"'~! MAIN CHARGE IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,760.99 "" ,\~~, - ",.; ~ . ""I ,'-'t':-' '/"1'~ It.. '33 Ita. '34 AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF NAPLES FOR INTERIM S!1fJ!:R SERVICE A8D CtJS'rOMBR TURNOVER FOR THE COT'l'AGES See Page ~ Ýð lOOK 092 nf.[ 272 Page 42 , '.¡.9 . 1 :. '., Æ'~æ' ~- '-.':;: , . " ' ....:f~· , " , "" 'Î ,~ .' ~ ..".......-1" l.' . " ~.~:t' \~'.; .î . _. ", ..../;;.#, _4', . "','~( '~,' '" ,.,~. ",':, ':'~~'~~:,4,,' ~ ~'~ _'. -",A#~, '1.... " _;,",_.......,,_"..""___."'",..""......,,'~~.. '"_;'-',."..~"',_,."."""'~,.,. ...._w..'~,,~·;"..._,.. ,.....' ¡ ____......._...-_;"',"".,"""''''''"""..c'''"'''·'"''"".·,·",..·,·'.·'''_'.............··,_·,..,".>^"...., ..._.......'~,'__~"~.