Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Bayshore Gateway CRA Advisory Agenda 05/01/2018
Offices: 3570 Bayshore Drive, Unit 102, Naples, Florida 34112 Phone: 239-643-1115 Online: www.bayshorecra.com Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Agency AGENDA May 1, 2018 6:00 PM Chairman Maurice Gutierrez Karen Beatty, Peter Dvorak, Larry Ingram, Ron Kezeske, Steve Main, Shane Shadis, Michael Sherman 1. Call to order and Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Adoption of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes a. April 3, 2018 (attachment) 5. Community / Business – Presentations a. Mattamy Homes- Matt Hermanson, P.E. Grady Minor 6. Old Business a. Vacant Lots – Jennifer A. Belpedio, CAO b. Code Enforcement – Jamie French, Deputy Department Head, GMD c. Public Art - Laura Burns, Ad Hoc committee recommendations Murals – Executive Summary from CAO (attachment) d. 17 Acres - Staff update e. Redevelopment Plan - Workshop update, Next steps f. CDBG Grant – Fire Suppression Phase 2- Staff update (attachment) g. Walking Audit Report – (attachment) 7. New Business a. Advisory Board Application – Dwight Oakley (Attached) Action Item b. Budget Review - Attachment (Action Item) c. Website Update/Community Outreach Offices: 3570 Bayshore Drive, Unit 102, Naples, Florida 34112 Phone: 239-643-1115 Online: www.bayshorecra.com 8. Staff Report a. Project list update by Staff b. Financials 9. Other Agency’s a. Collier County Sheriff Department b. Collier County Code Enforcement 10. Commination and Correspondence a. Advisory Board Vacancy – Gateway Triangle Resident / Business Owner 11. Public Comment 12. Staff Comments 13. Advisory Board General Communications 14. Next meeting date: June 5, 2108 15. Adjournment 1 Agenda item 4,a– April 3, 2018 meeting minutes BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LOCAL ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF THE APRIL 3, 2018 MEETING The meeting of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Advisory Board was called to order by Chairman, Maurice Gutierrez at 6:03 p.m. at the CRA Office, 3750 Bayshore Drive, Unit 102, Naples, FL 34112 I. Roll Call: Advisory Board Members Present: Maurice Gutierrez, Karen Beatty, Mike Sherman, Steve Main, Shane Shadis and Peter Dvorak. Excused Absence: Larry Ingram. Absent: Ron Kezeske. CRA Staff Present: Shirley Garcia, Operations Coordinator, CRA; Tami Scott, Senior Project Mgr.; and Debrah Forester, CRA Director; Naomi Hutcheson, Administrative Assistant; Tim Durham, Executive Director of Corp Business Ops. II. Pledge of Allegiance: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Gutierrez III. Adoption of Agenda: Debrah Forester requested that the two murals on the Agenda for review, items 6(d) and 6(e), be moved forward due to the number of attendants at the meeting for those particular items. She also requested the addition of a Draft Letter for the Community Redevelopment Agency’s (CRA) Advisory Board to review under Agenda item VII. New Business. Peter Dvorak, Vice Chair, made a motion accept Amended Agenda wherein the Mural Issue will be addressed before the Community Presentation and to add the Draft Letter under New Business. Second by Karen Beatty. Passed Unanimously. IV. Adoption of Minutes: Peter Dvorak, made a motion to accept March Minutes as is. Second by Karen Beatty. Passed Unanimously. V. Murals: A. BCC Mural Recap: Maurice Gutierrez, Chairman, gave a brief recap on the mural discussion that occurred during the joint meeting between the CRA and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) on April 3rd, 2018 at 1:00pm. Both Boards are in accordance that until a firmly established process is in place for Public Art in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, no further applications will be accepted. The two current murals may remain intact as is. The Boards are comfortable with the murals despite contentious issues revolving around them. They ask only a formality of paperwork to resolve the issue. Debrah reinforced this by stating the information she garned from the Code Enforcement Office after the joint BCC/CRA meeting. All 2 future and current mural projects have been put on hold until an official process is established. No new code cases will be established on the current murals. The CRA Board has the right to either put the current code cases on hold until such a time that an appropriate process is established, or they can vote to keep the murals as they currently are and close the code cases. Eric Short from Code Enforcement reiterated that the Code Department could close the cases without any additional work from the property owners by voting to keep the murals as is, and submitting the meeting minutes to the Code Enforcement Office. If the CRA does not want to keep the murals as they currently are, they can vote to put the code cases on hold. B. Future Applications: Peter Dvorak made a motion to recognize no additional applications for murals be accepted until formal standards have been set. Second by Mike Sherman. Passed Unanimously. C. Mural Review-Jaron Fine Jewelry, 3784 Bayshore Drive: Peter Dvorak made a motion to approve the Jaron building mural at 3784 Bayshore Drive as is. Second by Steve Main. Passed Unanimously. D. Mural Review—Diane Sullivan, 3248 Bayshore Drive: Peter Dvorak made a motion to approve the Diane Sullivan building Mural at 3248 Bayshore Drive as is. Second by Steve Main. Passed Unanimously. VI. Community/ Business Presentations: A. Mini Triangle-Presentation by Bob Mulhere, FAICP Hole Montes: Debrah Forester introduced Bob Mulhere from Hole Montes, who did a PowerPoint presentation on the proposed development and the revisions to the rezoning application since he presented in November. Based on comments received, the developer has been asked to revision the mix of uses and eliminate the proposed matrix. They will be presenting at the April 5th Planning Commission and the May 8th BCC meeting. They are currently on schedule to close in late 2018. The presentation included the basics of how the conversion matrix worked using trips generated by uses in tandem with the Collier County Department of Transportation’s (DOT) formulas to calculate PM Peak Hour Trips. The presentation included charts indicating minimums and maximums of unit type allowances in relation to estimated vehicular traffic projections as well as an overview of project design, information on the negotiations with the Naples Airport in relation to building height (projected final height 168ft), and multiple conceptual images. The contract for the parcel was finalized in 2016, the CRA gave their unanimous support in November 2017, and they have met with the CCPC on February 15th, March 1st, and will again on April 5th, 2018. It goes before the BCC on May 8th, 2018. Debrah Forester asked the CRA Board to consider a recommendation on the proposed changes made to the plans since the November 2017 meeting. Peter Dvorak made a motion to support the Mini Triangle as presented with the 3 changes adopted since the November meeting. Second by Steve Main. Passed Unanimously. VII. Old Business: A. Vacant Lots: Debrah Forester gave a quick refresher on the Vacant Lot issue with Lend Equity—represented by William Rose—and the Love & Legacy Lots (Previously being handled by Cal Montenegro). Jennifer Belpedio in the County Attorney’s Office has been discussing the issue with Mr. Rose. Mr. Rose has been informed that the CRA did not approve the $10k per lot offer previously presented. Staff provided a counter offer of $10,000 plus a profit share of 6% of the sales price. Mr. Rose’s attorney has reached out to Ms. Belpedio and said the profit share was unacceptable and then a suggestion of $15k per lot was offered. Tim Durham reported that he had spoken briefly to Ms. Belpedio just prior to the meeting and the $15,000 per lot appeared to be their final offer. Should the CRA accept the offer, details including the timeline would be established wherein Lend Equity would pay $15k per lot for five lots immediately, with the additional lots divided into groupings to be paid in 6 month increments. Should they not complete construction as outlined, a penalty would be built into the terms. And if they didn’t complete the first set as outlined, the terms of the proposal would be terminated. General disappointment amongst the CRA that neither Jennifer or Mr. Rose were in attendance. A community member, Justine, asked why they were not on the open market? Community Member Carla Corbin asked why the issue was not settled. Vice Chair Peter explained that the deeds were clearly drawn up with the CRA under BCC, which included a reverter claus. However suspect transactions have incurred a large legal mess. Peter personally advocates for an upfront settlement that allows the issue to be done. He would like to reject the $15k offer, even if it is upfront, as that is less than the CRA paid to acquire the properties and the land is worth significantly more now. He believes that a counter offer should not be accepted unless is begins with a 2 or 3. Tim interjected that staff was eager to move towards closure and that the CRA is in a much stronger financial position now than when they sold the lots originally. Karen Beatty requested the CRA refrain for negotiations until the different parties can show up to a meeting. She also suggested enforcing the reverter clause and taking the property back. Mike Sherman feels the Board has been too lenient. That there was nothing written down to allow the transactions that happened with the deed and that the lending company does not have a case. The lots cannot be utilized as leverage. Steve Main would be willing to accept an upfront offer of $50k-$75k for each property, otherwise he presented a motion to assert the CRA’s Rights and take the titles back, just like the deed states. Second by Karen Beatty. Passed Unanimously. 4 B. 17 Acres-Staff Update: Debrah Forester and Tim Durham provided an update on the project, stating they have been meeting weekly with Arno, who is very enthusiastic about the project. No additional proposals were received by the March 19th date. Additional due diligence regarding the financial commitment has taken place and Arno has decided to change financial partners. He is working with the new group to obtain the financial commitment needed and they are doing their own due diligence on the project. The committee discussed the opportunity of including the CRA office and public meeting rooms in the new development and requested including some language in the Purchase and Sale Agreement to include the CRA office. It was suggested the office be located in a commercial building and meetings held in the theater. Mr. Gutierrez inquired of the gathered public what their preference was in the location of the CRA office and monthly meetings. It was recommended to keep the CRA Office on Bayshore Drive, and future meetings could either be held in the coming theater or at the Naples Botanical Gardens. Steve was under the impression the office had been taken off the plans. Debrah Forester mentioned that Arno continues to work through the plan details that will be presented during the rezoning of the property but the terms should be the same as what was presented to the CRA Board in February 2018. Tim added that he is meeting weekly with Arno who is very enthusiastic about the project. The item is scheduled to go back to the CRAB on April 24th, 2018. Once all the preliminaries are finalized and approved the other financial party’s name will be made available. C. Redevelopment Plan: Debrah has sent out Save-The-Dates to the CRA Board members in regard to the April Redevelopment Plan meetings. Tami Scott, Sr. Project Manager, went over the current proposed schedule. Wednesday, April 25th, 2018 is an invitation only kick off meeting from 12:30 to 2:30 pm at the Naples Botanical Garden Conference Room. Attendees have been asked to RSVP as it will be a catered working lunch. Several Stakeholder meetings are scheduled on Wednesday evening and throughout the day on Thursday, with small focus groups in mind. While these meetings are open to the public, they will be focused and fact finding, covering predetermined areas of attention for the Redevelopment Plan. The big meeting for the entire community will be on Thursday, April 26th, 2018 at 6pm at the Naples Botanical Gardens Buehler Auditorium. Karen Beatty inquired as to whether the Bayshore Beautification MSTU would be having its own meeting. Staff is unsure that there would be enough turnout to justify the separate time slot and space, but that the current schedule is a draft and will be tweaked and polished and a finalized copy sent out prior to the meetings. VIII. New Business: A. Reappointments: i. Ron Kezeske: Ron Kezeske was absent from the meeting. Shirley Garcia mentioned that he does not wish to re-apply. His term is up in 5 May. His spot is now considered open. Discussion took place regarding the vacancy. He was the business representative for Davis Blvd. Steve Main’s business has moved during his current term to Davis Blvd. Mr. Main stated he would be willing to move laterally to the David Blvd Board position and allow his Bayshore Business position to be opened for further applicants. Shirely Garcia said she would forward Steve Main’s information to Wanda Rodriguez in the County Attorney’s Office who will take care of the paperwork to make the change. Debrah Forester requested a motion be passed in regard to this change in title just in case. Maurice Gutierrez inquired if changing it to a Bayshore Business Owner or Artist was a possibility. Debrah Forester said it could be brought up during the Redevelopment Plan Workshop during discussion about the CRA Boards Structure, but as of now it would need to remain a Business Owner. Maurice Gutierrez made a motion that Steve Main move laterally from the position of Bayshore Business Owner to the position of Davis Business Owner. Second by Peter Dvorak. Passed Unanimously. ii. Maurice Gutierrez: Peter Dvorak made a motion to reappoint Maurice Gutierrez to the CRA Board. Second by Karen Beatty. Passed Unanimously. iii. Michael Sherman: Peter Dvorak made a motion to reappoint Mike Sherman to the CRA Board. Second by Steve Main. Passed Unanimously. IX. Staff Report A. Project Manager Report: Tami mentioned that the Project Manager Report was not included in the packet but that she wanted to highlight just a few points: i. Project Map: A map of the Bayshore district was distributed that depicted all the projects in the area with a blue dot. She noted that it is exciting and encouraging to see how many projects are currently underway in the area. ii. Mattamay Homes & Thomasson Drive: Staff has met several times with Mattamay homes. They do not have a project to show to the CRA yet, but discussion about landscaping, sidewalks, benches, art, etc. on Thomasson Dr and Bayshore Dr have commenced. There are concerns with both parties about the timing and overlapping construction between their project and the Thomasson Drive project. The county is working on an agreement with Mattamay to have construction access on Thomasson Drive with the stipulation that they cover any damage cost done to the Thomasson Drive project. The 6 proposed wall will be 6 feet in height and will be 7.5 ft from the property line in their 15ft buffer. iii. Windstar: Windstar will be covering the expense for external landscaping installation and maintenance along their wall after the completion of the Thomasson Drive/Hamilton Drive project. Until that time the wall will remain blank to keep from going two steps forward and one step back. iv. Racetrac: Has gone to the Hearing Examiner (HEX), which is a two step process. There are some negotiations still underway in regard to distance waivers. Both HEX Decision were signed on March 20th, 2018. Racetrac is willing to present to the CRA, but no date has been set yet. A possible stipulation was suggested that language be inserted to assure that the previous property under consideration would not be allowed to develop as a gas station. Staff can follow-up with Mike Bossi for a recommendation on bringing forward that option during the zoning process. v. Thomasson Drive: A Bayshore Beautification project that starts at the end of Hamilton Drive and goes through Orchid. The 100% drawings have been submitted by RWA and are awaiting final approval. Expanding the boundaries of the MSTU to include the right of way (ROW) from Dominican to Orchid is being reviewed to present to the BCC. Staff aims to have the least disruption to school and peak hour traffic. B. Draft Letter: The CRA Advisory Board voted on March 6th, 2018 to write a letter to the BCC regarding affordable housing in the area and the proposed Housing Plan. Staff has complied a letter and asked the CRA Advisory Board to review the letter and vote on whether it is or is not what they would like to submit to the BCC. Steve inquired why a vote was necessary again. Debrah Forester explained the letter was drafted utilizing the motion passed during the March 6th, 2018 meeting in conjunction with staff’s interpretation of the conversation had by the CRA Advisory Board. In addition, several CRA Board members were not present during the vote and should be allowed to weigh in on the verbiage of said letter. She did not feel comfortable presenting words on behalf of the CRA to the BCC without a firm backing that what is stated in the letter fully addresses their concerns regarding diversifying affordable housing throughout the county. It was agreed either a consensus of the board to approve the letter would be sufficient as it was previously voted on. However, for prudence sake, Peter Dvorak moved to approve the letter articulating a vote regarding affordable housing, have the Chairman sign said letter, and have the letter sent to the Board of County Commissioners. Second by Mike Sherman. Passed Unanimously. 7 C. Financials: Debrah and Tami distributed a copy of the CRA current, official financial standing. Peter asked a number of questions in regard to inventory, market values, restrictions, and real values of property. Shirley informed him the CRA pays a $50K/month on a loan which is held in collateral. Peter stated a $5 million loan should be a liability which would cut the net worth in half. He would like a handle on the actual budget at the next meeting. He stated that since the CRA is technically a County Department, there should be someone in the financial department that is monitoring the finances for the department and can provide a profit & loss as well as balance sheet with anticipated TIFs. Staff will continue to work with the Budget Office to get additional information. X. Correspondence and Communications: A. Keep Collier Beautiful: Shirley Garcia reminded everyone that there is still time to sign up to come out on April 14, 2018 to help clean up the Bayshore Area and Haldeman Creek. Shirley Garcia is working with Code Enforcement to have enough shirts, dumpsters, maps, etc. XI. Public Comments: A. Help for Elderly/Veterans: A community member inquired about what services the area was providing for individuals who are elderly/veterans. His neighbor is over 80 and not physically capable of resolving his code cases on his own. Corporal Mike Nelson, Collier County Sheriff’s office, mentioned there are many services available. He himself has assisted many individuals in the area to stay healthy in a safe living environment. However, the county cannot physically move or remove anyone. Corp. Nelson offered to discuss in more detail after the meeting. B. Vacant Lots/Parking: Several open lots in the area were discussed as potential parking for area establishments. The proposed empty lots being utilized as parking lots or parking structures would accommodate the rise in project business without having to worry about street parking. This conversation also included possible location for the CRA Office. It was decided to keep the monthly regular meeting on Bayshore, no matter the location of the office. It is easier for the community to attend. Arno’s original plans included a space for the CRA office and meeting spaces. That will be revisited. Naples Botanical Gardens has also offered meeting space. XII. Staff Communication: A. Sherriff Dept: Corp. Mike Nelson mentioned some restricting in the department and introduced his new Immediate Director/Supervisory for Community 8 Policing, Sgt. David Plamondan. It is his first time in the area, but they are excited to have him on their team. A general discussion about proactive patrolling ensued including clarification on a point of contact in case of an issue. Corp. Nelson stated he is still the main contact, but he would leave the cards of the other officers covering the area in the CRA office as well. It was also mentioned that Corp. Nelson received recognition for efforts with Kid’s Bicycle Safety. Ms. Garcia mentioned that many officers never receive recognition, but Corp. Nelson has accomplished 2 safety awards during his time as an Officer of the Law. The CRA is proud to have such an accomplished and dedicated leader in the community. B. Code Cases: Karen Beatty inquired on how Code Enforcement can become more proactive so that citizen do not need to call in issues that are obviously Code Violations. A list of all current code cases was distributed to the CRA. Eric Short reviewed the list, noting 15 were highlighted in yellow still pending their initial 45 days of investigation. Two of those would be closed out after the meeting with the CRA approval of the two murals. Several code violations were stated as well, including an unregistered vehicle being moved from spot to spot. Eric Short mentioned that proactive code citations are for Health and Safety concerns. It was suggested that during the redevelopment plan update, the Committee could make recommendations on the codes in Bayshore to reflect the community’s vision. Otherwise Code must act within the parameters currently set. Shirley Garcia, Mike Nelson and Eric Short all gave examples of Code acting proactive for the betterment of the community. Karen Beatty made a motion that Code Enforcement be more proactive in their dealings so that citizens do not have to make reports. Second by Mike Sherman. Passed Unanimously. C. Dan Burden: Debrah mentioned that Dan Burden, from the Blue Zone Project, has drafted a report that he would like to present it to the CRA at the next meeting. The information may be useful as we review and update the Redevelopment Plan. XIII. Advisory Board General Communication: A. Thanks: Maurice Gutierrez and Karen Beatty both wanted to thank the staff of the CRA and BCC for a productive day of meetings. Peter thanked the community for their productive, positive, progressive participation. It is greatly appreciated how much this community comes together. XII. Next Meeting Date: April 3, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. XIII. Adjournment – The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. 9 __________________________________________ Chairman Maurice Gutierrez Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. East Naples Discovery Report –The Built Environment – January 2018 1 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Table of Contents 2 Section Slide # Acknowledgements 3 The Blue Zones Project®Approach 4 Built Environment Principles 9 Discovery Phase: East Naples 34 Strengths 39 Opportunities 43 Marquee Project Opportunities 44 Capacity-Building Opportunities 50 Policy Opportunities 54 East Naples Toolbox 58 For More Information 67 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Acknowledgements 3 Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Laura DeJohn-Director of Planning and Landscape Architecture, Johnson Engineering, INC. Mike Bosi-Collier County Zoning Division Director Collier County Commissioner Donna Fiala, District 1 Collier County Commissioner Penny Taylor, District 4 Blue Zones Built Environment Committee Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. The Blue Zones Project®Approach 4 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Where it All Began Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Ikaria, Greece Blue Zones Longevity Hot Spots 6 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Shared Traits of the Longest-Lived People Power 9® is a registered trademark of Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. MOVE NATURALLY 1.Make daily physical activity an unavoidable part of your environment RIGHT OUTLOOK 2. Know your purpose 3. Downshift: work less, slow down, take vacations EAT WISELY 4. Eat until 80% full 5. More veggies, less meat & processed food 6. Drink a glass of red wine each day BELONG 7. Create a healthy social network 8. Connect/reconnect with religion 9. Prioritize family 7 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. 50%20%10%20% ACCESS TO CARE GENETICS ENVIRONMENT HEALTHY BEHAVIORS BLUE ZONES PROJECT What Determines Our Health? 8 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Built Environment Principles 9 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. “Healthy places are those designed and built to improve the quality of life for all people who live, work, worship, learn and play within their borders –where every person is free to make choices amid a variety of healthy, available, accessible and affordable options.” –Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Health and Healthy Places 10 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Why Transform the Built Environment? Place matters to our health. •A person’s zip code can be a more reliable determinant of health than their genetic code. •The type of community a person lives in and the design of places where people work, worship, shop, learn and play have a tremendous impact on health. •Decades of sprawl have resulted in auto-focused design and poorly planned growth. •The consequences are congestion, inactivity, obesity, exposure to pollutants, traffic crashes and loss of economic vitality and community life. Why Transform the Built Environment? We can do better. 11 Source: “Zip code a better predictor of health than genetic code,” 2014: http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/storynewsplus/zip-code-better-predictor-of-health-than-genetic-code/ Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Streets Impact Health & Wellbeing Conventional street engineering widens roads for vehicular efficiency. People walking and bicycling become discouraged, so more people end up driving. Crashes increase, due to increased load and added conflict points. Roadway sections can double or triple in price. Walking is engineered out of the environment. Rebuilding the intersection on the left to support walking and bicycling lowers speed and noise, shortens crossing times, moves more cars, reduces personal injury crashes by 90%, and eliminates delays for both people walking and driving. When the street honors development, development will honor the street. 12 Photo vision: Todd Clements Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Streets Impact Our Children Crossing multiple lanes of traffic is a safety issue for many parents who then deny their child walking trips to school. Sections of roads that are wider than they need to be force people into cars, building more traffic and delay. Collier County and East Naples have much at stake to build the social, physical and emotional health of children. Building and maintaining low speed environments, compact intersections and properly scaled streets are essential to raise the region’s school walking rates.13 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Streets Impact Our Elders Small features often make the most difference for livability. High curbs, poor drainage, dog fouling and broken sidewalks are cited as physical hazards that keep elders from venturing out. In contrast, shade trees, benches, and sit-walls are highly valued micro features that enable elders to enjoy neighborhood walks and easily run errands on foot. Well -designed crossings, on this former 5-lane road, remove barriers, rather than create them. 14 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Speed MattersYour Commute Improves Health or Reduces Health UCLA & Cal State-Long Beach: Vehicle-miles traveled has a stronger correlation with obesity than any other lifestyle factor. 15 Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2011/05/your_commute_is_killing_you.html Source: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/urban-survival/201501/commuting-the-stress-doesnt-pay Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. The Benefits of Designing Streets for People Benefits Include •Increases physical activity rates •Encourages social connectedness •Catalyzes small business development •Increases property values •Improves access and safety for all •Advances social equity •Reduces pollution and run-off •Provides safe routes to school •Makes the healthy choice the easy choice Source: Victoria Transport Policy Institute http://www.vtpi.org Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. The Life Radius Approach to Community-Building •Most Americans spend 80% of their lives within 20 miles of their homes; we call this area the life radius. •Built environment policies and design features either encourage or discourage healthy behaviors. •The Built Environment team assesses policies, plans, and existing conditions in a community and works with community partners to determine which interventions will make the healthy choice the easy choice. 17 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. The Life Radius Approach to Community-Building Well -connected streets encourage active transport but destinations are needed High levels of connectivity offer people choices for transportation. Speeds are typically lower as traffic is disbursed across a network, making walking and cycling safer and more comfortable. Well -connected and destination-rich streets create healthy communities With many nearby destinations, a life radius shrinks to one or two miles since all needs are met locally. Most trips are accomplished on foot or bicycle, reducing traffic and keeping money in the local community. This is the goal. Poor connectivity results in car dependence Weak pedestrian connections force people into cars and traffic onto a few streets which must carry heavier traffic volumes. This model of planning makes walking uncomfortable and impractical since destinations are at a distance. 18 Image Credit: Glatting Jackson Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. How Easy is Active Transportation in Our Community? In many places –such as the walled communities in East Naples –which induce higher traffic volumes and higher speed roadways, people are deterred from walking or cycling. Under such conditions, active transportation is not an easy or comfortable choice. Destinations are indirect and too hard to reach by foot –very much like climbing the staircase in the lower image. It is the town code –or the community DNA –that determines whether active transportation is even an option. 19 Cartoon Credit: Ian Lockwood Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Suburban land use forms (above left) are designed primarily for the car, while people are an afterthought. This form has many conflicts for all modes. No one watches over the street because buildings are set-back and hidden behind vast parking lots. A single commercial land use dampens the desire to walk since destinations and housing remain apart. Goods and services are not easily accessed. On the other hand, the urban land use form (above right) illustrates a design for people first, while the car is accommodated. This design keeps speeds low, reduces the number of conflict points, establishes place, highlights the community’s unique character and charm, encourages local commerce and inspires active transportation. Goods and services are easily accessed. Image Credit: WALC Institute Designing for Cars Vs. Designing for People 20 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. •79% of Americans want to live in a walkable neighborhood. •51% of Millennials prefer living in houses where they can walk to shops and have a short commute. •Yet, only 14% of today’s neighborhoods are walkable and demand is far outpacing supply. honor its community. Driveways establish too many conflict points to encourage walking and the bleak street discourages people. The development on the right properly orients buildings to place ‘eyes on the street’ and limits the conflict points a pedestrian will encounter, encouraging activity for all ages. Source: National Association of Realtors, 2015) Designing for Cars Vs. Designing for People 21 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Community Building Would you allow a ten-year old walk to school through this space alone? Not likely. What would you add to create a more walkable environment? The lower image adds sidewalks and crossings –a good start. Encouraging active transportation requires land use and transportation planning decisions are aligned to ensure that residents and community members feel watched over and safe. How Do We Complete a Place? Would you allow a 10-year-old to walk to school through this space alone? Not likely. What would you add to create a more walkable environment? The lower image adds sidewalks and crossings –a good start. Encouraging active transportation requires land use and transportation planning decisions to be aligned so that community members feel safe, comfortable and watched over. Photo vision: Steve Price, Urban Advantage 22 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Community-Building Opportunities Once trees and benches are added, we begin to build a space that expects and welcomes guests. Are we finished designing for people? Not by a long shot. The lower image orients buildings and front porches to place “eyes on the street.” With the presence of people, the street becomes a safer shared space that encourages active transportation. Land use and transportation planning must support one another. Homes either facing a park or open space will market for approximately 15% more than more distant properties. Photo vision: Steve Price, Urban Advantage Source: https://msu.edu/~sta/Anderson_openspace_MJE.pdf 23 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Safe Routes to School The number of children who walk or bike to school fell 75%between 1960 and 2009. Childhood obesity rose 76%during that same period A street that brings back walking must have more than an okay place to walk. Ample width sidewalks, trees, buffers to sidewalks (bike lanes) and streets that become place bring down speed and bring back students and health. Safe Routes to School The number of children who walk or bike to school fell 75%between 1960 and 2009. During this same period, childhood obesity rose 76%. Active transportation is a great way to achieve 150 minutes of physical activity per week. To encourage active transportation, the street’s design elements must bring down speeds and protect all users. Then, families feel safe walking and biking to school. Photo vision: Steve Price, Urban Advantage Sources: http://www.saferoutesinfo.org/ https://stateofobesity.org/obesity-rates -trends-overview/ https://health.gov/paguidelines/ 24 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Understanding Boulevards Boulevards must move traffic efficiently, however, they are not required to be ugly, intimidating and dangerous. In this conversion, all through lanes are kept, improving traffic flow. Often suburban to urban street changes provide greater efficiency in traffic movement. Medians, for instance, can add 17-20% greater capacity. The lower image demonstrates an environmentally-and business-friendly design option that carries the same amount of traffic, as it builds love for home. Photo vision: Steve Price, Urban Advantage 25 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Understanding Avenues Streets that gather traffic from local roads are known as collectors and they should be places where people want to live, shop, work and play. Well -designed streets allow people to take walks, use transit, bike and enjoy their unique neighborhood. When a street feels right, we behave well; when the street does not behave well, we do not. Place is established through the urban design and land use decisions we make. Our street designs make a community feel welcoming or make it feel like a drive- thru. Photo vision: Steve Price, Urban Advantage 26 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Understanding Intersections Important crossroads of two collectors or arterials become an ideal location for a village. Throughout history the most important places to live, work, shop and play were often built around these junctions. If left only to engineers to widen and move traffic these centers would fail. Bringing in architects, planners, developers and others allows them to come alive, producing the social and retail exchange that people seek. Understanding Intersections -Nodes- The crossroads of two collectors or arterials is an ideal location for a village node. Throughout history, important places to live, work, shop and play were often built at these junctions. Designed well, they become places of the heart, the community focal point, and a source of pride. Engineers, designers, architects, planners, developers and members of the public must work together to advance designs that produce the social and retail exchange people seek for village nodes to emerge. Photo vision: Steve Price, Urban Advantage 27 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Understanding Intersections -Efficiency & Safety- The intersection in the top image is inefficient and unsafe. It is dangerous to those wanting to cross and, therefore, it is hostile to businesses. Modified as a roundabout, the engineer has reduced the potential for personal injury crashes and, at the same time, has eliminated delays to motorists and pedestrians. Once the community considers placemaking as central to urban design and transportation planning, an area will transform into a bustling environment for convenient services. Such a change brings back life to the downtown and this arterial strip street. When intersections become true nodes (gathering places) land values can increase from $3-5/square foot to $15-35/square foot. Photo vision: Steve Price, Urban Advantage Source: Joe Minicozzi, AICP, Urban 3, http://www.urban-three.com 28 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Understanding Intersections -Placemaking- The intersection in the top image is inefficient and the crossing distance is unfriendly to pedestrians, exposing them to risk for an extended period of time. Modified as a roundabout, the community gains a safer intersection for all users, while also further establishing place. Intersection design offers tremendous opportunities to add beauty and charm to a community, and protect our most valuable resource: our people. Photo vision: Steve Price, Urban Design 29 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Placemaking People seek places of the heart. While this may be a beach or other cherished natural or cultural place, the built environment can be enlivened by design decisions. Place-based planning assesses all land use and transportation investments to ensure they align with the community’s vision. Streets occupy so much of our shared public space that they must be considered as a community-building opportunity. The siting of parks and schools offers tremendous opportunities with significant impacts to health and well-being. 30 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved.31 Invest in What You Want Over the last 60 years, American cities and counties, both large and small, have focused policy on auto-centric street and land-use practices which have had many unintended negative effects on individual and community health, economic vitality, social connectedness, affordable lifestyles and overall well-being. Blue Zones Projects work with community leaders to advocate for policies, principles and best practices that bring back natural movement and choice in how people access daily places within their community. Community infrastructures like trails, roads, sidewalks, bike lanes, parks and other public spaces affect our ability to move naturally, connect socially and support local economies. The formula is simple, pump less money into things we don’t want and more into things we do. Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved.32 Creating Healthier Communities Creating healthier built environments is not solely the business of planners and engineers. Elected officials, city planners, transportation decision makers, architects, landscape architects, builders, real estate developers, citizens, community organizations, healthcare professionals, the business community, school boards and members of the public all have a role to play in addressing community design challenges. Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Does The Built Environment Honor What We Value? “Protect through action that which you most treasure -people and place.” –Dan Burden Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Discovery Phase East Naples, Florida 34 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. •Share the on-the-ground realities of a community’s built environment. •Celebrate the unique history, culture, demographics and lifestyle of East Naples. •Identify possible policies, plans, marquee projects and capacity-building opportunities for the community to discuss and prioritize at the Built Environment Summit. •Serve as a catalyst for change by educating, empowering and equipping community leaders to take the steps to create healthier built environments. 35 Discovery Phase -Objectives Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. The Study Area 36 Bayshore Drive, East Naples, Florida Walking Audit shown in Orange Potential canal bridge link Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. The Study Area 37 Bayshore Drive East Naples (residential street)East Naples (connector street)Tamiami Trail, U.S. 41 Affordable housing, East NaplesThomasson Drive Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. The Walking Audit 38 On Bayshore Drive, East Naples, Florida, lanes have been narrowed and painted bike lanes have helped slow traffic. Meanwhile, there is much more that can be advanced to make this a destination street. More than 30 people took part in a walking audit along Bayshore Drive, adding ideas and gaining knowledge on how to make this street more supportive of walking, bicycling and retail life. Although Bayshore Drive is already one of the more green and welcoming streets in the region, much more can be done to make it a signature street. Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Discovery Phase Findings –East Naples Strengths 1.Proven leaders in Complete Streets are making progress across Florida 2.There are local best practices to learn from 3.Recent streetscape improvements in East Naples advance active transportation 39 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Strengths Proven leaders in Complete Streets are making progress across Florida 40 Former District Director, Billy Hattaway not only set an important stage for the district, but for walking, bicycling and liveability for Florida, as well. Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Strengths There are many local best practices to learn from 41 Road Diets Clearwater, Florida Curb Extensions Venice, Florida Lower Speed Designs Clearwater, Florida Roundabouts Bradenton Beach, Florida Safe Crossings Venice, Florida Gateways Sarasota, Florida Raised Intersections Sarasota, Florida Trail Crossings Orlando, Florida Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved.42 Bayshore Drive uses innovative colorized bike lanes. This conversion of Bayshore, adding the median, tightening the lanes to 10 feet, creating the bike lanes, in 2012, has improved walking and bicycling conditions. However, more consideration for walking and bicycling is important. How can we reduce the speed of traffic and the exiting speed onto side street entries, while providing higher level options for those bicycling? The current design (as shown) supports about 6% of the public who desire to ride bikes. Other designs -such as protected bike lanes –will meet the needs of 60% of the US population. Recent streetscape improvements in East Naples advance active transportation Strengths Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Discovery Phase Findings –East Naples Opportunities 1.Marquee Project Opportunities: •Advance the Bayshore Drive Road Diet and Use Curb Extensions •Create a Link Trail into Sugden Regional Park •Trial a Home Street on Jeepers Drive, N Road or Short Road •Plan an Urban Village for East Naples 2.Capacity-Building Opportunities: •School Lead Work with Safe Routes to School Coordinator •Develop a Complete Streets Outreach & Education Plan 3.Policy Opportunities: •Reduce Speeds in School Zones to 20mph •Choose a ‘Roundabouts First’ Intersection Policy •Adopt a Vision Zero Policy 43 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Bayshore Drive: Road Diet 44 Bayshore Drive, East Naples, Florida Bayshore Drive was rebuilt in recent years. The painted bike lanes separate the threat of cars from pedestrians. Meanwhile, this boulevard style street remains overbuilt for both present and future traffic. With a low in-season volume of 9,000 vehicles per day, this roadway can benefit from a lane reduction (road diet) allowing cars to flow more smoothly, better support walking and bicycling, reduce crashes, and set the stage for development to shift from strip style to village style. See the following pages for additional information. Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Local Best Practice: Tropicana Boulevard 45 Tropicana Boulevard, Collier County: This street was rebuilt in recent years to take out non- essential lanes. Two other streets in the same area (Golden Gate) are being considered for similar treatments. This view of the road illustrates how simple a lane conversion can be in its early stages. Buffered bike lanes are a low-cost paint solution that could be considered for the next phase of improvements for Bayshore Drive. Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Bayshore Drive: Use Curb Extensions 46 On Bayshore Drive, many side street crossings are overly-wide (50 feet). This creates exposure, risk and discomfort to people on foot, and discourages walking. Curb extensions can be used to support walking and bicycling, while reducing conflict points for pedestrians. This set of curb extensions drops the crossing distance and crossing times in half. The curb extension not only narrows the exposure to one-half, while opening sight lines and lowering turning speeds, it also makes the intersection safer and more comfortable for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Create a Link Trail into Sugden Regional Park 47 A short bridge across a canal can be designed as a simple flatbed railroad car sitting on two pylons, on up to an aesthetic treatment similar to the one shown here. The new structure can open up the park for significant new walking and activity. In some cases, a link can be sponsored by a local civic group or other benefactor. Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Trial a ‘Home Street’ on Jeepers Drive, N Road or Short Road 48 One lower priced concept, known as a Home Street, reallocates space by painting low-volume streets with a single 10-foot travel lane for bi- directional travel, then remakes the remaining space into walking and bicycling space. Here are two streets in America that have redesigned their speed for things they value the most: human activity. People on these streets “own” the street which advances social interaction, walking and bicycling, as well as play. This street, in Manhattan Beach, California, was designed for alley loading only. Although a full width street, which can permit moving vans or a emergency responder, it is only on a rare occassion that a car is permitted. In this image above, in northwest Seattle, a regular width (28-foot wide) local street was narrowed to 10 feet, and allows two directional travel. Parking and rain gardens were added. Pedestrian, bicyclists and motorists share this street as speeds are kept to under 10 mph. Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Plan an Urban Village for East Naples 49 Government Center, or another location, such as Thomasson Lane and Rattlesnake Hammock Road could provide an ideal location for establishing the Village of East Naples. Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Discovery Phase Findings –East Naples Capacity-Building Opportunities 50 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. The photograph in the upper image was taken at the East Naples Middle School shortly after a child lost his life here. Florida consistently leads the nation in fatalities to people attempting to walk or bicycle. The design of many streets encourages speeding and fails to protect children crossing the street. The lower street, which once looked like the street above, now accommodates those who drive, walk or bike to school. Top Photo: East Naples Middle School, Florida Bottom Photo: Safe Routes to School, Sacramento, California Schools Lead Work with Safe Routes to School Coordinator 51 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Children have much to offer in the community planning and design process, yet they remain mostly untapped throughout community transformation processes. They can dream up the perfect community in which to live, play and go to school. Beyond the power of their imaginations, they also can bring very practical solutions to the table. For example, children often are aware of shortcuts to the places they go that could be formalized into trails and added to the community’s pedestrian network. Schools Lead Work with Safe Routes to School Coordinator 52 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Develop a Complete Streets Outreach & Education Plan To build support for Complete Streets projects, the list of stakeholders should be broadened to include members of the public, business and property owners, elected officials, community boards and neighborhood association leaders, school and health agency staff, main street and non-profit representatives and major employers. Churches, journalists, philanthropists and children should also be engaged to confirm their vision, build support for Complete Streets, and to capture concerns in a timely manner. Residents in Farmington, New Mexico, utilized iPads to share individual’s goals for their community. Schools often bring children on walking audits. What can East Naples do to encourage a community-wide discussion on how transportation systems should function? Develop a Complete Streets Outreach & Education Plan 53 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Discovery Phase Findings –East Naples Policy Opportunities 54 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Speed MattersReduce Speeds in School Zones to 20mph Higher speeds increase the likelihood and severity of crashes while lower speeds improve safety for everyone, especially people walking and cycling. Survival for a pedestrian is directly tied to vehicular speed. Engage the Collier County Council and the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization to craft and pass a resolution that reduces the default speed limit around schools to 20 mph from 25 mph. 55 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Implement a ‘Roundabouts First’ Policy •A roundabout has ¼ of the number of potential conflicts compared to signalized intersections. •These conflicts are at low speed since vehicles enter the intersection at lower speeds and softer angles. •Roundabouts reduce personal injury crashes by 90% and have been recognized as a proven safety countermeasure by the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and the National Insurance Institute, with each encouraging communities to choose a ‘roundabouts first’ approach to intersection design. Choose a ‘Roundabouts First’ Intersection Policy 56 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Speed MattersAdopt a Vision Zero Policy Traffic crashes are the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S. and globally. In 2015, 1.25 million people died around the world in traffic violence. In the U.S. last year, 35,092 people died in traffic crashes, an increase of 7.2% over the prior year. This was the greatest percentage increase in traffic violence in this nation since the 1960s. A Vision Zero Policy sets the goal of eliminating all traffic deaths and serious injuries that occur on our streets by a certain date. Join local and regional efforts underway in advocating for a Vision Zero Policy. Source: https://visionzeronetwork.org/resources/speed-fatality-map 57 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. East Naples Toolbox 58 Ideas for Inspiration Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Buffered Bike Lanes Buffered Bike Lanes provide further benefits for all road users, including: •Offering a better defined space for people on bikes which reduces sidewalk riding •Increasing the buffer between bicyclists and motorists, and motorists and pedestrians •Promoting an orderly flow of traffic and reducing conflict points •Increasing the sight distance for motorists entering the roadway from driveways and side streets •Improving the turning radius for larger vehicles •Allocating space for motorists to pull out of the travel lane when emergency responders must pass Best Practice: 6’ minimum bike lane 10” edge striping 59 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Protected Bike Lanes Protected Bike Lanes provide benefits for 60% of the U.S. population, rather than 6% who will use bike lanes. Benefits include: •Fully separating bicyclists from moving traffic •Offering a defined space for people on bikes which reduces sidewalk riding •Promoting an orderly flow of traffic and reducing conflict points •Increasing the sight distance for motorists entering the roadway from driveways and side streets •Improving the turning radius for larger vehicles Best Practice: 6’ minimum bike lane brings the bicyclist into full view at intersections 60 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Curb Extensions Curb extensions, or bulb-outs, place pedestrians out from behind parked cars, improving sightlines and reducing crossing distances. Curb extensions create compact intersections that promote walking and make the intersection operate more efficiently. Curb extensions reduce vehicle turning speeds by physically and visually narrowing the roadway. Curb extensions provide increased pedestrian waiting space. Curb extensions reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians by 44 feet at this intersection in Venice, FL 61 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Pop -Up Traffic Calming Demonstration Project Neighbors in the Pogo Park area of the Iron Triangle in Richmond, California, came together to trial traffic calming tools, including mini circles and curb extensions, and to test safer, age-friendly and inclusive street treatments in their community. This project is also an example of transportation equity. 62 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. As Collier County advances its pedestrian and bicycle features, it’s a good time to pilot wayfinding by using temporary signs that encourage active transportation to key destinations. Low-Cost Wayfinding Implementation Project 63 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Low-Cost Intersection Redesign Demonstration Project Pop -Up Demonstration Project 64 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Low-Cost Placemaking Demonstration Project Pavement-to-Parks Project 65 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. Next Steps Between the Discovery Phase activities and the Summit, the following activities should take place: •Review the Built Environment Discovery Report. •Discuss findings with the Blue Zones Project team, friends and neighbors, as well as elected officials. •Identify your marquee project. This involves a charrette with all key players involved. •Flag additional opportunities for consideration. •Consider your priorities. •Identify any foreseeable barriers or obstacles to implementation. •Identify opportunities to cross-promote or leverage complementary efforts. 66 Copyright © 2017 Blue Zones, LLC. All rights reserved. For More Information Jessica Ayers-Crane Community Policy Lead –Blue Zones Project, SWFL T: 239.404.4924 E: jessica.ayerscrane@sharecare.com 67 Advisory Board Application Form Collier County Government 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 Application was received on: 4/20/2018 11:01:45 AM. Name: Dwight Oakley Home Phone: Home Address: 8080 Bayshore Dr. City: Naples Zip Code: 34112 Phone Numbers Business: 239-262-0073 E-Mail Address: dwight@dwightoakley.com Board or Committee: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board Category: Not indicated Place of Employment: Self-employed/ Dwight Oakley Architect How long have you lived in Collier County: more than 15 How many months out of the year do you reside in Collier County: I am a year-round resident Have you been convicted or found guilty of a criminal offense (any level felony or first degree misdemeanor only)? No Not Indicated Do you or your employer do business with the County? No Not Indicated NOTE: All advisory board members must update their profile and notify the Board of County Commissioners in the event that their relationship changes relating to memberships of organizations that may benefit them in the outcome of advisory board recommendations or they enter into contracts with the County. Would you and/or any organizations with which you are affiliated benefit from decisions or recommendations made by this advisory board? No Not Indicated Are you a registered voter in Collier County? Yes Do you currently hold an elected office? No Do you now serve, or have you ever served on a Collier County board or committee? No Not Indicated Please list your community activities and positions held: Education: Architecture (B.Arch.) : Auburn University Experience / Background Practicing licensed Architect - State of Florida 1985 to current day. Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2019 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Bayshore Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) ForecastAdopted Requested ChangeExpandedActualCurrent FY 2018 FY 2019FY 2019FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017 FY 2019 Department Budgetary Cost Summary 251,734 491,600 490,800 - 490,800 426,700 (0.2%)Personal Services 437,506 1,007,400 1,356,900 - 1,356,900 719,800 34.7%Operating Expense 60,100 57,500 62,100 - 62,100 57,500 8.0%Indirect Cost Reimburs 175,809 4,403,200 4,926,500 - 4,926,500 659,300 11.9%Capital Outlay - 75,000 175,000 - 175,000 - 133.3%Grants and Aid 925,149 6,034,700 7,011,300 - 7,011,300 1,863,300 Net Operating Budget 16.2% 8,116 11,400 12,100 - 12,100 11,400 6.1%Trans to Property Appraiser 21,115 29,300 31,000 - 31,000 29,300 5.8%Trans to Tax Collector 136,800 136,800 136,800 - 136,800 136,800 0.0%Trans to 187 Bayshore Redev Fd 85,500 631,000 625,100 - 625,100 631,000 (0.9%)Trans to 287 CRA Loan - 3,700 - - - 3,700 (100.0%)Trans to 506 IT Capital - 131,000 122,900 - 122,900 - (6.2%)Reserves for Contingencies - 2,137,000 3,221,800 - 3,221,800 - 50.8%Reserves for Capital 1,176,680 9,114,900 11,161,000 - 11,161,000 22.4% 2,675,500 Total Budget ForecastAdopted Requested ChangeExpandedActualCurrent FY 2018 FY 2019FY 2019FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017 FY 2019 Appropriations by Program 297,250 5,037,200 5,747,100 - 5,747,100 341,000 14.1%Bayshore Beautification MSTU (163) 195,137 - - - - 675,200 Bayshore CRA Grant and Grant Match (717/718) na 414,227 951,900 1,258,400 - 1,258,400 786,600 32.2%Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelop (187) 18,535 45,600 5,800 - 5,800 60,500 (87.3%)Haldeman Creek MSTU (164) Total Net Budget 1,176,680 9,114,900 11,161,000 - 11,161,000 22.4% 2,675,500 Total Budget Total Transfers and Reserves 925,149 6,034,700 1,863,300 7,011,300 - 7,011,300 251,531 3,080,200 812,200 4,149,700 - 4,149,700 16.2% 34.7% Department Funding Sources ForecastAdopted Requested ChangeExpandedActualCurrent FY 2018 FY 2019FY 2019FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017 FY 2019 977,728 1,130,000 1,197,800 - 1,197,800 6.0% 1,084,800 Ad Valorem Taxes 850 - - - - - Delinquent Ad Valorem Taxes na - - - - - 7,000 Charges For Services na 84,641 15,000 - - - (100.0%) 67,000 Miscellaneous Revenues 64,780 58,300 92,800 - 92,800 59.2% 73,000 Interest/Misc 70,952 - - - - 675,200 Reimb From Other Depts na 1,094 - - - - - Trans frm Property Appraiser na 6,933 - - - - - Trans frm Tax Collector na 1,054,000 1,274,200 1,350,700 - 1,350,700 6.0% 1,274,200 Trans fm 001 Gen Fund 238,600 288,400 305,700 - 305,700 6.0% 288,400 Trans fm 111 MSTD Gen Fd 125,500 125,500 125,500 - 125,500 0.0% 125,500 Trans fm 163 Baysh/Av Beaut Fd 11,300 11,300 11,300 - 11,300 0.0% 11,300 Trans fm 164 Haldeman Creek - 78,000 74,100 - 74,100 (5.0%) 78,000 Trans fm 186 Immok Redev Fd 5,474,700 6,194,500 8,067,500 - 8,067,500 30.2% 7,058,600 Carry Forward - (60,300)(64,400) - (64,400) 6.8% - Less 5% Required By Law Total Funding 11,161,000 8,111,078 9,114,900 11,161,000 - 22.4% 10,743,000 Fiscal Year 2019 1 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2019 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Bayshore Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Department Position Summary Forecast FY 2018 Adopted Requested ChangeExpandedActualCurrent FY 2019FY 2019FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017 FY 2019 4.00 4.00 4.00 - 4.00 0.0%Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelop (187) 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 - 4.00 0.0% 4.00 Total FTE Fiscal Year 2019 2 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2019 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Bayshore Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelop (187) Mission Statement To support the efforts of the Board of County Commissioners which established itself as the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) and made a finding of necessity and of blight conditions in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Component Redevelopment Area by adopting Resolution 2000-82 on March 14, 2000, and to implement the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Component Section of the Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan adopted by the CRA. FY 2019 Budget FY 2019 Total FTE FY 2019 Revenues FY 2019 Net CostProgram Summary CRA Implementation - 1,137,277 1,137,277 2.85 Monitor, update and implement the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle component of the Collier County Community Redevelopment Plan. Project & MSTU Management -15,677 136,800 121,123 1.15 Manage CRA & MSTU projects within the district including; streets, sidewalks, lighting, landscaping and other improvements. Land acquisition and rehabilitation projects include purchase of blighted properties and construction/re-development of commercial and residential buildings. Transfers for Debt Service - 625,100 625,100 - Reserves 15,677 2,281,923 2,297,600 - 4.00 4,181,100 4,181,100 -Current Level of Service Budget ForecastAdopted Requested ChangeExpandedActualCurrent FY 2018 FY 2019FY 2019FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017 FY 2019 Program Budgetary Cost Summary 251,734 491,600 490,800 - 490,800 426,700 (0.2%)Personal Services 111,693 333,600 512,500 - 512,500 308,600 53.6%Operating Expense 50,800 48,500 53,600 - 53,600 48,500 10.5%Indirect Cost Reimburs - 3,200 26,500 - 26,500 2,800 728.1%Capital Outlay - 75,000 175,000 - 175,000 - 133.3%Grants and Aid Net Operating Budget 414,227 951,900 1,258,400 - 1,258,400 786,600 32.2% 85,500 631,000 625,100 - 625,100 631,000 (0.9%)Trans to 287 CRA Loan - 3,700 - - - 3,700 (100.0%)Trans to 506 IT Capital - 131,000 122,900 - 122,900 - (6.2%)Reserves for Contingencies - 1,601,200 2,174,700 - 2,174,700 - 35.8%Reserves for Capital 499,727 3,318,800 4,181,100 - 4,181,100 26.0% 1,421,300 Total Budget 4.00 4.00 4.00 - 4.00 0.0% 4.00 Total FTE Fiscal Year 2019 3 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2019 Requested Budget Office of the County Manager Bayshore Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelop (187) Program Funding Sources ForecastAdopted Requested ChangeExpandedActualCurrent FY 2018 FY 2019FY 2019FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017 FY 2019 - - - - - 7,000 Charges For Services na 78,613 15,000 - - - (100.0%) 67,000 Miscellaneous Revenues 14,202 15,300 28,600 - 28,600 86.9% 20,000 Interest/Misc 1,054,000 1,274,200 1,350,700 - 1,350,700 6.0% 1,274,200 Trans fm 001 Gen Fund 238,600 288,400 305,700 - 305,700 6.0% 288,400 Trans fm 111 MSTD Gen Fd 125,500 125,500 125,500 - 125,500 0.0% 125,500 Trans fm 163 Baysh/Av Beaut Fd 11,300 11,300 11,300 - 11,300 0.0% 11,300 Trans fm 164 Haldeman Creek - 78,000 74,100 - 74,100 (5.0%) 78,000 Trans fm 186 Immok Redev Fd 814,200 1,512,700 2,286,800 - 2,286,800 51.2% 1,836,700 Carry Forward - (1,600)(1,600) - (1,600) 0.0% - Less 5% Required By Law Total Funding 4,181,100 2,336,415 3,318,800 4,181,100 - 26.0% 3,708,100 Notes: A challenge facing the CRA is the decline in taxable value and the resulting impact on its Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenue. The CRA’s tax increment value peaked in 2008 at $626,776,903. Today the taxable increment is $376,271,932. While the tax increment has increased substantially, year over year, the tax increment revenue is $699,200 off the peak of $2,285,351 (2008). On July 26, 2006, the CRA entered into a loan agreement with Wachovia Bank under which a line of credit was secured for $7,000,000. Of this amount, $5,901,000 was drawn to purchase and assemble commercial property within the Gateway Triangle catalyst project area as an incentive to attract private development interest. On July 28, 2009, a $13,500,000 term loan was secured through Fifth/Third Bank which paid off the earlier Wachovia line of credit and provided additional dollars for strategic property acquisition. The term of this note was five (5) years with a final maturity date of September 1, 2014. The note was restructured in May 2013 into the Fifth Third Bank Note Series 2013. On March 2, 2017, the debt was again restructured. The restructured note, TD Bank, N.A. Series 2017, provided proceeds of $5,293,293 which were used to pay off the Fifth Third Bank Note. The term of the TD Bank Note is ten (10) years with a final maturity of March 1, 2027. As of September 30, 2017 the TD Bank, N.A. Series 2017 Note has an outstanding principal balance of $5,072,089. Forecast FY 2018: The personal services forecast reflects savings from position vacancies. Operating expenses are in line with the adopted budget and include the CRA Redevelopment Plan update. The primary revenue source for the Bayshore CRA is Tax Increment Financing revenue (TIF). TIF revenue is budgeted as transfers from the General Fund (001) and the Unincorporated Area General Fund (111). The Bayshore CRA taxable increment value generated a combined TIF revenue of $1,562,600. Current FY 2019: The budget is based on three (4) FTEs and a full time job bank Planning Technician position. The operating expense budget provides flexibility for as needed professional and contract services. In the grants and aid category the proposed pool of grant dollars for the Community Improvement Grant Program provides for an incremental $100,000 and the carryforward of program funding provided FY 18. The capital outlay budget provides for a vehicle for the CRA Director. This mechanism will allow the FY 19 budget to accommodate the pay out of FY 18 contracts. A transfer to debt service fund (287) provides for annual debt service requirements. A substantial capital reserve is provided. Revenues: The primary sources of funding are Tax Increment Financing (TIF) derived from the CRA's property tax increment and fund carryforward. The Initial estimated FY 19 tax increment value is $398,848,247 a 6% increase over last year. Applying the respective General Fund and Unincorporated Area General Fund tax rate, CRA TIF revenue is estimated to be $1,656,400. This revenue is recorded as transfers from the General Fund (001) and the Unincorporated Area MSTD General Fund (111). Carry forward into FY 19 is anticipated to be $2,286,800. A transfer in of $74,100 from the Immokalee CRA Fund is programmed to support a portion of the CRA Director's cost. The reduction in charges for services and miscellaneous revenues reflects the anticipated closing on the sale of the Triangle properties and the resultant termination of revenues generated from those properties. Fiscal Year 2019 4 Office of the County Manager Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2019 Account Major Fund Line Item Detail Proforma FY 2017 Forecast Current Expanded Budget % Change FY 2019 Actual Amended FY 2018FY 2018 Adopted FY 2019 FY 2019 FY 2019 Adopted 163 Bayshore/Avalon Beautification MSTU 60 Operating Expense Expenditures 63,281 150,000 177,212 30,000 470,000 0 470,000162525-163 631400 Engineering Fees 213.33 800 0 0 100 0 0 0162525-163 631650 Abstract Fees 0.00 100 100 100 100 0 0 0162525-163 634211 IT Billing Hours 100.00 8,700 8,500 8,500 8,500 7,800 0 7,800162525-163 634970 Indirect Cost -8.24 8,389 5,000 5,000 0 0 0 0162525-163 634980 Interdept Payment 100.00 88,770 100,000 103,610 100,000 90,000 0 90,000162525-163 634990 Landscape -10.00 71,072 250,000 356,317 150,000 200,000 0 200,000162525-163 634999 Other Contractual -20.00 1,037 0 0 0 0 0 0162525-163 641950 Postage Freight 0.00 18,115 21,000 21,000 21,000 25,000 0 25,000162525-163 643100 Electricity 19.05 0 2,100 2,100 2,100 1,700 0 1,700162525-163 645100 Insurance General -19.05 0 900 900 900 600 0 600162525-163 645260 Auto Insurance -33.33 5,868 40,000 40,000 12,000 6,500 0 6,500162525-163 646311 Sprinkler System -83.75 3,000 15,000 15,000 7,500 15,000 0 15,000162525-163 646318 Mulch 0.00 600 1,800 1,800 1,800 800 0 800162525-163 646430 Fleet Maint Isf -55.56 100 1,600 1,600 1,600 100 0 100162525-163 646440 Fleet Maint ISF -93.75 191 0 0 0 200 0 200162525-163 646445 Fleet Non Maint 0.00 17,264 21,000 21,000 0 21,000 0 21,000162525-163 646451 Lighting 0.00 9,084 10,000 10,000 0 0 0 0162525-163 648170 Marketing And 100.00 0 0 0 100 300 0 300162525-163 649030 Clerks Recording 0.00 0 0 0 0 700 0 700162525-163 649100 Legal Advertising 0.00 677 10,000 10,000 5,000 7,000 0 7,000162525-163 652310 Fertilizer Herbicides -30.00 202 200 200 300 400 0 400162525-163 652490 Fuel and Lubricants 100.00 297,250 774,339 341,000 847,100 0 847,100 637,200 32.94Expenditures 70 Capital Outlay Expenditures 0 4,400,000 4,400,000 0 4,900,000 0 4,900,000162525-163 763100 Improvements 11.36 0 4,400,000 0 4,900,000 0 4,900,000 4,400,000 11.36Expenditures 91 Transfers Out Expenditures 125,500 125,500 125,500 125,500 125,500 0 125,500929010-163 911870 Transfer To 187 0.00 125,500 125,500 125,500 125,500 0 125,500 125,500 0.00Expenditures 93 Transfers to Constitutional Officers Expenditures 7,618 10,600 10,600 10,600 11,200 0 11,200959010-163 930600 Budget Transfers 5.66 19,525 27,300 27,300 27,300 28,900 0 28,900959010-163 930700 Budget Transfers 5.86 27,144 37,900 37,900 40,100 0 40,100 37,900 5.80Expenditures 99 Reserves Expenditures 0 186,300 186,300 0 640,900 0 640,900919010-163 993000 Reserve For Capital 244.02 0 186,300 0 640,900 0 640,900 186,300 244.02Expenditures 29 Ad Valorem Taxes Revenues 916,679 1,051,100 1,051,100 1,009,100 1,114,200 0 1,114,200162525-163 311100 Current Ad Valorem 6.00 916,679 1,051,100 1,009,100 1,114,200 0 1,114,200 1,051,100 6.00Revenues 36 Miscellaneous Revenues Revenues 787 0 0 0 0 0 0162525-163 311200 Delinquent Ad 0.00 65 0 0 0 0 0 0162525-163 361320 Interest Tax 0.00 6,028 0 0 0 0 0 0162525-163 369130 Ins Co Refunds 0.00 8,712 0 0 0 0 0 0989010-163 361170 Interest Sba 0.00 38,480 40,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 0 60,000989010-163 361180 Investment Interest 50.00 54,072 40,000 50,000 60,000 0 60,000 40,000 50.00Revenues 40 Transfer In and Other Sources Revenues 0 0 137,139 0 0 0 0919010-163 489201 Carry Forward Of 0.00 0 -54,600 -54,600 0 -58,600 0 -58,600919010-163 489900 Less 5% Required 7.33 1,027 0 0 0 0 0 0959010-163 486600 Transfer From 0.00 6,411 0 0 0 0 0 0959010-163 486700 Transfer From Tax 0.00 7,438 82,539 0 -58,600 0 -58,600-54,600 7.33Revenues 49 Carryforward Revenues 4,355,000 4,350,400 4,350,400 4,883,300 5,438,000 0 5,438,000919010-163 489200 Carryforward 25.00 4,355,000 4,350,400 4,883,300 5,438,000 0 5,438,000 4,350,400 25.00Revenues 504,400Fund Total Expenditure: 6,553,600 0 6,553,600 5,524,039 449,894 5,386,900 21.66 1 4/23/2018GovMax V5 Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2019 Account Major Fund Line Item Detail Proforma FY 2017 Forecast Current Expanded Budget % Change FY 2019 Actual Amended FY 2018FY 2018 Adopted FY 2019 FY 2019 FY 2019 Adopted 5,942,400Fund Total Revenue: 5,438,000Fund Balance: 6,553,600 0 6,553,600 5,524,039 5,333,189 4,883,296 0 0 0 0 5,386,900 0 0.00 21.66 164 Haldeman Creek MSTU 60 Operating Expense Expenditures 0 0 100,000 60,000 0 0 0144258-164 649990 Other 0.00 0 20,000 20,000 0 0 0 0162547-164 631400 Engineering Fees 100.00 600 500 500 500 700 0 700162547-164 634970 Indirect Cost 40.00 17,935 20,000 20,000 0 5,000 0 5,000162547-164 634999 Other Contractual -75.00 0 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 0162547-164 641950 Postage Freight 100.00 0 0 0 0 100 0 100162547-164 645100 Insurance General 0.00 0 1,500 1,500 0 0 0 0162547-164 647110 Printing Binding 100.00 0 2,500 2,500 0 0 0 0162547-164 649990 Other 100.00 0 100 100 0 0 0 0162547-164 651210 Copying Charges 100.00 18,535 145,600 60,500 5,800 0 5,800 45,600 -87.28Expenditures 91 Transfers Out Expenditures 11,300 11,300 11,300 11,300 11,300 0 11,300929010-164 911870 Transfer To 187 0.00 11,300 11,300 11,300 11,300 0 11,300 11,300 0.00Expenditures 93 Transfers to Constitutional Officers Expenditures 498 800 800 800 900 0 900959010-164 930600 Budget Transfers 12.50 1,590 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,100 0 2,100959010-164 930700 Budget Transfers 5.00 2,087 2,800 2,800 3,000 0 3,000 2,800 7.14Expenditures 99 Reserves Expenditures 0 349,500 349,500 0 406,200 0 406,200919010-164 993000 Reserve For Capital 16.22 0 349,500 0 406,200 0 406,200 349,500 16.22Expenditures 29 Ad Valorem Taxes Revenues 61,049 78,900 78,900 75,700 83,600 0 83,600162547-164 311100 Current Ad Valorem 5.96 61,049 78,900 75,700 83,600 0 83,600 78,900 5.96Revenues 33 Intergovernmental Revenues Revenues 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0144258-164 331220 Fed Em Mgt 0.00 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0.00Revenues 36 Miscellaneous Revenues Revenues 63 0 0 0 0 0 0162547-164 311200 Delinquent Ad 0.00 4 0 0 0 0 0 0162547-164 361320 Interest Tax 0.00 614 0 0 0 0 0 0989010-164 361170 Interest Sba 0.00 2,703 3,000 3,000 3,000 4,200 0 4,200989010-164 361180 Investment Interest 40.00 3,384 3,000 3,000 4,200 0 4,200 3,000 40.00Revenues 40 Transfer In and Other Sources Revenues 0 -4,100 -4,100 0 -4,200 0 -4,200919010-164 489900 Less 5% Required 2.44 67 0 0 0 0 0 0959010-164 486600 Transfer From 0.00 522 0 0 0 0 0 0959010-164 486700 Transfer From Tax 0.00 589 -4,100 0 -4,200 0 -4,200-4,100 2.44Revenues 49 Carryforward Revenues 305,500 331,400 331,400 338,600 342,700 0 342,700919010-164 489200 Carryforward 3.41 305,500 331,400 338,600 342,700 0 342,700 331,400 3.41Revenues 74,600 417,300 Fund Total Expenditure: Fund Total Revenue: 342,700Fund Balance: 426,300 0 426,300 509,200 370,522 426,300 0 426,300 509,200 31,922 338,600 0 0 0 0 409,200 409,200 0 0.00 4.18 4.18 2 4/23/2018GovMax V5 Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2019 Account Major Fund Line Item Detail Proforma FY 2017 Forecast Current Expanded Budget % Change FY 2019 Actual Amended FY 2018FY 2018 Adopted FY 2019 FY 2019 FY 2019 Adopted 187 Bayshore/Gateway Tri 50 Personal Services Expenditures 146,142 328,387 328,387 296,078 307,245 0 307,245138325-187 512100 Regular Salaries -6.44 200 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,000 0 2,000138325-187 512600 Er 457 Deferred -20.00 10,776 10,000 10,000 10,000 45,000 0 45,000138325-187 513100 Other Salaries And 350.00 1,044 0 0 0 0 0 0138325-187 514100 Overtime 0.00 0 1,280 1,280 600 1,231 0 1,231138325-187 515000 Vacation Sell Back -3.83 18,093 0 0 0 0 0 0138325-187 518100 Termination Pay 0.00 0 9,521 9,521 0 6,144 0 6,144138325-187 519100 Reserve For Salary -35.47 13,112 31,239 31,239 23,000 27,715 0 27,715138325-187 521100 Social Security -11.28 16,166 38,851 38,851 24,700 31,554 0 31,554138325-187 522100 Retirement Regular -18.78 3,821 13,100 13,100 13,100 13,000 0 13,000138325-187 523149 Health Ins - Job -0.76 39,300 52,400 52,400 52,400 52,400 0 52,400138325-187 523150 Health Insurance 0.00 1,471 1,961 1,961 1,961 1,961 0 1,961138325-187 523152 Dental Insurance 0.00 271 361 361 361 400 0 400138325-187 523153 Short Term 10.80 571 761 761 761 800 0 800138325-187 523154 Long Term 5.12 567 950 950 950 881 0 881138325-187 523160 Life Insurance -7.26 200 289 289 289 469 0 469138325-187 524100 Workers 62.28 251,734 491,600 426,700 490,800 0 490,800 491,600 -0.16Expenditures 60 Operating Expense Expenditures 0 0 5,500 5,500 150,000 0 150,000138325-187 631400 Engineering Fees 0.00 0 2,000 2,000 2,000 5,000 0 5,000138325-187 631600 Appraisal Fees 150.00 2,100 1,800 1,800 1,800 3,000 0 3,000138325-187 634207 IT Capital 66.67 10,900 11,800 11,800 11,800 18,200 0 18,200138325-187 634210 Info Tech 54.24 0 0 0 0 300 0 300138325-187 634212 IT Microsoft Office 0.00 50,800 48,500 48,500 48,500 53,600 0 53,600138325-187 634970 Indirect Cost 10.52 2,501 5,000 5,000 3,000 6,000 0 6,000138325-187 634980 Interdept Payment 20.00 49,991 234,000 234,000 190,000 234,000 0 234,000138325-187 634999 Other Contractual 0.00 648 2,500 2,500 700 6,000 0 6,000138325-187 640300 Out Of County 140.00 0 400 400 400 800 0 800138325-187 641230 Telephone Access 100.00 0 2,500 2,500 0 1,300 0 1,300138325-187 641700 Cellular Telephone -48.00 2,904 0 0 0 0 0 0138325-187 641900 Telephone Sys 0.00 10 600 600 0 600 0 600138325-187 641950 Postage Freight 0.00 954 2,000 2,000 1,500 3,000 0 3,000138325-187 643100 Electricity 50.00 0 0 0 2,500 1,500 0 1,500138325-187 643400 Water And Sewer 0.00 19,817 20,700 20,700 21,600 30,000 0 30,000138325-187 644100 Rent Buildings 44.93 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 2,800 0 2,800138325-187 645100 Insurance General 55.56 140 0 0 0 0 0 0138325-187 646180 Building R And M 0.00 5,241 8,000 8,000 0 10,000 0 10,000138325-187 646360 Maintenance Of 25.00 0 2,000 2,000 0 5,500 0 5,500138325-187 647110 Printing Binding 175.00 4,582 3,000 3,000 0 6,000 0 6,000138325-187 648170 Marketing And 100.00 0 20,000 20,000 0 0 0 0138325-187 649050 Property 100.00 3,969 2,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 0 4,000138325-187 649100 Legal Advertising 100.00 181 0 0 0 0 0 0138325-187 649990 Other 0.00 946 1,500 1,500 1,000 3,000 0 3,000138325-187 651110 Office Supplies 100.00 3,938 6,000 6,000 0 7,000 0 7,000138325-187 651210 Copying Charges 16.67 0 1,000 1,000 0 3,000 0 3,000138325-187 652920 Computer Software 200.00 97 1,500 1,500 0 3,500 0 3,500138325-187 652990 Other Operating 133.33 1,046 1,500 1,500 0 4,000 0 4,000138325-187 654210 Dues And 166.67 -71 2,000 2,000 0 4,000 0 4,000138325-187 654360 Other Training Ed 100.00 0 0 0 62,000 0 0 0144259-187 646360 Maintenance Of 0.00 0 0 500,000 0 0 0 0144259-187 649990 Other 0.00 162,493 887,600 357,100 566,100 0 566,100 382,100 48.15Expenditures 70 Capital Outlay Expenditures 0 0 0 0 26,500 0 26,500138325-187 764110 Autos And Trucks 0.00 0 3,200 3,200 2,800 0 0 0138325-187 764900 Data Processing 100.00 0 3,200 2,800 26,500 0 26,500 3,200 728.13Expenditures 80 Grants and Aids Expenditures 0 75,000 75,000 0 175,000 0 175,000138325-187 884200 Residential Rehab 133.33 0 75,000 0 175,000 0 175,000 75,000 133.33Expenditures 91 Transfers Out Expenditures 85,500 631,000 631,000 631,000 625,100 0 625,100929010-187 912870 Transfer To 287 -0.94 0 3,700 3,700 3,700 0 0 0929010-187 915060 Transfer To 506 It 100.00 3 4/23/2018GovMax V5 Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2019 Account Major Fund Line Item Detail Proforma FY 2017 Forecast Current Expanded Budget % Change FY 2019 Actual Amended FY 2018FY 2018 Adopted FY 2019 FY 2019 FY 2019 Adopted 187 Bayshore/Gateway Tri 85,500 634,700 634,700 625,100 0 625,100 634,700 -1.51Expenditures 99 Reserves Expenditures 0 131,000 131,000 0 122,900 0 122,900919010-187 991000 Reserve For -6.18 0 1,601,200 1,601,200 0 2,174,700 0 2,174,700919010-187 993000 Reserve For Capital 35.82 0 1,732,200 0 2,297,600 0 2,297,600 1,732,200 32.64Expenditures 33 Intergovernmental Revenues Revenues 0 0 500,000 0 0 0 0144259-187 331220 Fed Em Mgt 0.00 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0.00Revenues 34 Charges for Services Revenues 0 0 0 7,000 0 0 0138325-187 347907 Parking Fees 0.00 0 0 7,000 0 0 0 0 0.00Revenues 36 Miscellaneous Revenues Revenues 78,613 15,000 15,000 67,000 0 0 0138325-187 362190 Lease Facilities 100.00 2,948 0 0 0 0 0 0989010-187 361170 Interest Sba 0.00 11,255 15,300 15,300 20,000 28,600 0 28,600989010-187 361180 Investment Interest 86.93 92,815 30,300 87,000 28,600 0 28,600 30,300 -5.61Revenues 40 Transfer In and Other Sources Revenues 0 0 5,500 0 0 0 0919010-187 489201 Carry Forward Of 0.00 0 -1,600 -1,600 0 -1,600 0 -1,600919010-187 489900 Less 5% Required 0.00 1,054,000 1,274,200 1,274,200 1,274,200 1,350,700 0 1,350,700929010-187 481001 Transfer From 001 6.00 238,600 288,400 288,400 288,400 305,700 0 305,700929010-187 481111 Transfer From 111 6.00 125,500 125,500 125,500 125,500 125,500 0 125,500929010-187 481163 Transfer From 163 0.00 11,300 11,300 11,300 11,300 11,300 0 11,300929010-187 481164 Transfer From 164 0.00 0 78,000 78,000 78,000 74,100 0 74,100929010-187 481186 Transfer From 186 -5.00 1,429,400 1,781,300 1,777,400 1,865,700 0 1,865,700 1,775,800 5.06Revenues 49 Carryforward Revenues 814,200 1,512,700 1,512,700 1,836,700 2,286,800 0 2,286,800919010-187 489200 Carryforward 51.17 814,200 1,512,700 1,836,700 2,286,800 0 2,286,800 1,512,700 51.17Revenues 1,421,300 3,708,100 Fund Total Expenditure: Fund Total Revenue: 2,286,800Fund Balance: 4,181,100 0 4,181,100 3,824,300 2,336,415 4,181,100 0 4,181,100 3,824,300 499,727 1,836,688 0 0 0 0 3,318,800 3,318,800 0 0.00 25.98 25.98 4 4/23/2018GovMax V5 Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2019 Account Major Fund Line Item Detail Proforma FY 2017 Forecast Current Expanded Budget % Change FY 2019 Actual Amended FY 2018FY 2018 Adopted FY 2019 FY 2019 FY 2019 Adopted 287 CRA Taxable Note (TD Bank), Series 2017 80 Grants and Aids Expenditures 473,132 456,900 456,900 456,900 473,500 0 473,500939010-287 871200 Principal Other 3.63 210,955 173,100 173,100 173,100 156,700 0 156,700939010-287 872200 Interest Other Debt -9.47 152 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 1,000939010-287 873100 Fiscal Agent'S 0.00 35,708 0 0 0 0 0 0939010-287 873850 Cost Of Issuance 0.00 5,253,793 0 0 0 0 0 0939010-287 874200 Payment To 0.00 5,973,740 631,000 631,000 631,200 0 631,200 631,000 0.03Expenditures 99 Reserves Expenditures 0 20,000 20,000 0 20,000 0 20,000919010-287 991000 Reserve For 0.00 0 330,000 330,000 0 330,000 0 330,000919010-287 992000 Reserve For Debt 0.00 0 350,000 0 350,000 0 350,000 350,000 0.00Expenditures 36 Miscellaneous Revenues Revenues 242 0 0 0 0 0 0989010-287 361170 Interest Sba 0.00 737 0 0 500 0 0 0989010-287 361180 Investment Interest 0.00 1,624 0 0 0 0 0 0989010-287 361190 Interest Other 0.00 2,603 0 500 0 0 0 0 0.00Revenues 37 Debt Proceeds Revenues 5,293,293 0 0 0 0 0 0939010-287 484100 Loan Proceeds 0.00 5,293,293 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00Revenues 40 Transfer In and Other Sources Revenues 85,500 631,000 631,000 631,000 625,100 0 625,100929010-287 481187 Transfer From 187 -0.94 85,500 631,000 631,000 625,100 0 625,100 631,000 -0.94Revenues 49 Carryforward Revenues 947,900 350,000 350,000 355,600 356,100 0 356,100919010-287 489200 Carryforward 1.74 947,900 350,000 355,600 356,100 0 356,100 350,000 1.74Revenues 631,000 987,100 Fund Total Expenditure: Fund Total Revenue: 356,100Fund Balance: 981,200 0 981,200 981,000 6,329,296 981,200 0 981,200 981,000 5,973,740 355,555 0 0 0 0 981,000 981,000 0 0.00 0.02 0.02 717 Bayshore CRA Grant 60 Operating Expense Expenditures 19,328 0 18,672 18,700 0 0 0138341-717 634999 Other Contractual 0.00 19,328 18,672 18,700 0 0 0 0 0.00Expenditures 70 Capital Outlay Expenditures 175,809 0 466,191 466,200 0 0 0138341-717 763100 Improvements 0.00 175,809 466,191 466,200 0 0 0 0 0.00Expenditures 40 Transfer In and Other Sources Revenues 70,952 0 484,863 484,900 0 0 0138341-717 487999 Reimbursement 0.00 70,952 484,863 484,900 0 0 0 0 0.00Revenues 484,900 484,900 Fund Total Expenditure: Fund Total Revenue: 0Fund Balance: 0 0 0 484,863 70,952 0 0 0 484,863 195,137 -124,185 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 4/23/2018GovMax V5 Collier County Government Fiscal Year 2019 Account Major Fund Line Item Detail Proforma FY 2017 Forecast Current Expanded Budget % Change FY 2019 Actual Amended FY 2018FY 2018 Adopted FY 2019 FY 2019 FY 2019 Adopted 718 Bayshore CRA Grant Match 70 Capital Outlay Expenditures 0 0 190,282 190,300 0 0 0138342-718 763100 Improvements 0.00 0 190,282 190,300 0 0 0 0 0.00Expenditures 40 Transfer In and Other Sources Revenues 0 0 190,282 190,300 0 0 0138342-718 487999 Reimbursement 0.00 0 190,282 190,300 0 0 0 0 0.00Revenues 190,300 190,300 Fund Total Expenditure: Fund Total Revenue: 0Fund Balance: 0 0 0 190,282 0 0 0 0 190,282 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 4/23/2018GovMax V5