The URL can be used to link to this page

BCC Minutes 06/16/1986 R , . Naples, Florida, June 16, 1986 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for tho County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Courthouse Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the member: present I CHAIRMAN: John A. Pis tor VICE-CHAIRMAN: Anne Goodnight Frederick J. Voss Max A. Hasse C. C. "Red" Holland ALSO PRESENT: James C. Giles, Clerk; Maureen Kenyon and Carmen Ruiz (2:00 P.M.), Deputy Clerks, Donald B. Lusk, County Manager, Neil Dorrill, Assistant County Manager; Pam Brengaccio, Deputy Assistent County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Tom Kuck, Public'Works Administrator, Vickie Mullins, Community Development Administrator; Ann McKim, David Weeks, and Charles Gauthier, Planners; Tom Crandall, Utilities Administrator; Dave pettrow, Zoning/Planning Director, Kevin O'Donnell, Public Services Administrator; Nancy Israelson, Administrative Assistant to the Board; and Deputy Chief Ray Sheriff's Department. {J~". ;~.;¡,rt "( i~'·'~"~;~J.q ~~c·_: 'J htt:J..... ,,:UIL i~')~~'J :~Íi; ;'., ~';;.IA .'.' ~ t; ..I,O : ,:::.¡;h;: !-',} ì<;' t.: .~Jti.:; b'~"u:.",.:':!::i.}I¡':' . 'v;'" r,~. . 1"·.' ~;.. " "'~'~' ... .../.:: 1 ~~1 Ute, f~¡ ; l. ...."'i~;...t'f*, ¡iD . ~'" '" > t,~ ,.! , ".:~~:::~.;; ".'r~ 'i (', '~';'.; ".' i ~ "" ::~':,,!":t ":1 ':," Page I lOOK 095 PACE 124 iODi' (j,U .,~ i _.,1 1 '-'~ "'_._....,.._.....""".._.."',..~..-."",."'--"-" _.~._"-......'_.".__.'.."....__...,"'_..,. ~-...."....~ \'; (L,t; I:.,~ . '1',""'" .~. ...' . ' \I'. A: tf' ·Il'.~".,~'.".,' .f., ".;¡:~: I" t~ .1''- ~t' ~;t ~'J " , " ',",./,' K' ¡\" ~¡\~. 6;". . ~!';~;.~ lODe 095 'A!;t 135 June 16, 1986 'l'ape t1 It.. t1 AGENDA - APPROVED WITH CHANGES Commis.ioner Voss moved, .econded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that the aqenda be approved with the followinq chanqe.. e. Item 9E2 re Capital Improvement Element to be heard et 11140 A.M. b. Item 14B8 to be moved to Item 9B4 c. Item 9D3 deleted. d. Item 9E6 re variable rate bond pools to be heard at 11lOO A.M. e. Item 14E2 deleted. It.. U KIHUT.. OF MAY 13, 20, AND 27, 19.1, REGULAR MEBTING. AND MAY 2S, 19.', SPBCIAL KEETING - APPROVED AS PRESENTED Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissionsr Goodniqht and carried unanimously, that the minute. of May 13, May 20, and May 27, 19.1, Regular meetinqa and May 29, 1981, Special .e.tinq b. approved a. pre.ented. Itea f3 JJ.KIB IIU'l"l'S RECOGMUED AS BMPLOYEB OF '!'HB nONTH FOR JUNE, 1986 Commissioner Pistor presented a plaque to Janie Butts recognizing her as Employee of the Month for June, 1986. Itea f4 BHPLOYEB SERVICB AWARDS PRESBNTED Commissioner Pistor presented Employee Service Awards to the fOllowing employees: , ':1;. Page 2 11:.1 - .. - '. "~'. í' l 'ri- 1, Eugene Staudenmeier - Animal Control Millie Kelly - Utilities Tami Buchan - Purchasing Josephine Johannes - Library Norma Trevino - Social Services June 16, 1986 IO years 5 years 5 years 5 years 5 years Ite. IS RESOLUTION 86-108 RE PETITION PU-86-7C, FRED H. CARR, REPRESENTING CAPRI CHRISTIAN C'HURCH, INC. RE·PROVISIONAL USES "c" OF THE "RSF-4" DISTRICT FOR A C!..tRC1! TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL PARKING FACILITIES ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HILO DRIVE AND CAPRI BLVD. - ADOPTED, SUBJECT TO PINDINGS OF FACT AND THE PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT Planner Weeks indicated the general location of the property as being on the southeast corner of Hilo Drive and Capri Blvd, Isles of Capri, noting that the petitioner is requesting additional parking facilities on an adjacent lot for an existing church that he proposes to expand. He noted that all surrounding lands are zoned RSF-4 and the subject property is vacant. He stated that immediately adjacent to the east and south are single-family residences, to the north across Hilo Drive is the existing church and to the west, across Capri Blvd., is a single family residence. He reported that Staff and all appropriate County agencies reviewed this petition and had no objec- tion to its approval subject to the stipulations outlined in the Exe- cutive Summary dated June 16, 1986. He stated that the CCPC held their public hearing on June S, 1986, and based upon their Findings of Fact, recommended approval sub~ect to the stipulaLions. He noted that no one spoke for or against the petition at the CCPC meeting and 3 lptters were received, all having nO objection, providing that an adequate buffer be utilized, and that there be no additional' flooding problems as a result of the parking lot. lOOK 095 ÞJr.! 136 Page 3 I· ') ,j;;: ':':1'<' . '1f'- J ! 1;,. ¡:~':" ..~ '","'" lOOK 095PACE137 L i.! I: J t~ June 16, 1986 Commissioner Goodnight moved, .econded by Commissioner Voss and carried unanimously, that Resolution 11-101 re Petition PU-II-7C be adopted, .Ubject to Pinding of Pact and the Petitioner's Agrsement. ,4'" . . I ¡ .'J ~>~ If.;;' ....-. f..' J '. 1" . .' .. ¡.'.... I';;·: .'. .~.............,. ,", I·.' , .,. .. r :. 1 " r- " }. ; ; e·:,¡ ~;I:"':I 'J'A;<:~ /!" f;YYd.; ~ 'n ~! r; ! ¡' 1 ::",:. ' ' ..-'- .r',,"'· " 'c,' ... : I I , , ¡ " Page 4 - .. - ~ ." .. ,;; :~.,~ . t;~-' ~~-" ~.;." ~r;i: June 16, 1986 It.. U STAFP TO IKPLEKEKT A TWO WEEX DUMPING AND CLEAN-UP PERIOD WITH TIPPING PEES TO BE WAIVED POR PROPERTY OWNERS THE PIRST TWO WEEKS OF JULY; EXCLUDING LAND-CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. STAFF TO DETERMINE COST AND PISCAL IMPACT AND REPORT BACK TO BCC SO SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT CAN BB COMPENSATED PROM GENERAL PUND. PETITION RE WAIVING OF LANDFILL DUMPING PEES POR NEAPOLITAN ENTERPRISES, INC. CONTINUED UNTIL T.UE END OP ~B TWO WEEK CLEAN-UP PERIOD. Mr. George Gramling, representing Neapolitan Enterprises, stated that his client is the owner of a lOO ecre parcel that has been cited es being a public nuisance. He stated that the Ordinance in question is 8S-13 which provides that accumulation of debris can constitute a public nuisance, and also gives the Commission authority to consider waiving the cost of clean-up and dumping fees. He reported that this is a petition to waive the dumping fees for this particular parcel. He n9ted that the nature of the land lends itself to illegal dumping due to the size of the parcel and the location. He stated that this owner has voluntarily cleaned up two properties after citation notice o! abatement of nuisance, adding that tha first parcel was only 2-1/2 acres but the labor involved to clean this parcel up was $800 and the dumping fees were $2,075. He noted that the second parcel was 10 acres and the labor for clean up was $1,000 and the dumping fees were $800, noting that this illustrates the great fluctuation in the amount of tefuse that can accumulnte on the property. He stated that this mal-,es it difficult for a large landowner to predict how much the ,'1',; d\1mping fees will be, but he has estimated that the cost will be far in excess of the previous two parcels. He noted that the labor is p, ';") Page S '. ~ 095n<:t142 ~\~,~~"')'::,,\ r, ~"'~';J.;,;J'.. , ;~~i. ':~f;~¿ ~~f{;~~~ "þ" . >t" C""""" ", ,'C' ,~;' "~"~""~~" ~j _."...,.."._-_.._---,...._-,,---,""~._""'........',""..'..."..,,"".,'~, 1', " .:-\ ~:;r.).; . 1Ir;--:a~:::~:lt:3be between $3,000 and $7,000. I.' June 16, 1986 He reported that he has estimated the dumping fees to be between $10,000 and $IS,OOO, noting that the petitioner feels that this is an extreme burden for him to bear to insure that this parcel meet the aesthetic requirements of the community. He sated that he is not certain if the ordinance con- templated this type of financial burden before it was enacted. He indicated that since 1982 when the Commission enacted the landfill dumping fee, the problem of public citizens dumping on private pro- perty has increased in order to avoid having to pay the landfill fee. He noted that this tends to impact the larger landowners more than the smaller ones, as the larger the parcel the harder it is to police and the greater the chance of illegal dumping on the property. He stated that the primary reason that he requests a waiver of the dumping fees in this case is that it is extremely expensive. He noted that this is not a one time clean up fee as the problem occurs every year and the owner has taken considerable measures to insure that it does not occur by digging trenches around unimproved property and policing the property, but illegal dumping still occurs. He stated that if the Commission does not have the desire to completely waive the dumping fee, he would suggest that the 'cost be shared with the lan~~wner. He stated that hi. client would request a complete waiver, but if that is not satisfactory, he would request that the landowner be required to bear the clean up cost which is the labor and the County share in the cost by waiving pert or ell of th~ dumping fees. Page 6 - .. .. - - - June 16, 1986 He stated that another solution would be to adopt a resolution that would waive dumping fees for acreage over a certain amount. County Manager Lusk stated that when a fee is waived, it does not mean that those fees disappear, adding that there is a certain cost to operate the land:ill and if someone does not pay their fair share, the other users will. He stated that he would not like to see fees waived for large property owners as there is a basic unfairness to it. Mr. Gramling stated that the Commission should consider the prece- dent that a waiver would set, but there is an ample rationale for waiving a fse for a larger landowner because they are the ones that have the illegal dumping on their property. Mr. tusk stated that there are a lot of five acre tracts in Golden Gate Estates that have illegal dumping and it is probably more of a burden on those people because they may not have the ability to pay a large cost to have their property cleaned up. Mr. Gramling stated that the problem is pOlicing the property and five acres is easier to police than 100 acres. He stated that a $20,000 expense on a yearly basis is a lot for a landowner to bear. Commissioner Pis tor stated that if the client decides to develop the land, they would have to pay to clean it up. He stated that with regcrds to the yearly expense of $20,000, this refuse has been accumu- hUng on the property over quite a few years. He stated that once·it is cleaned up and an effort is made to make it difficult to get on the property, there would not be a yearly COAt of cleaning this property. me 095,1<;!144 Page 7 _ 095n1;!145 June 16, 1986 He stated that the 10 acre lot cost quite a lot of money to clean up, but this piece of property had also been cited and the refuse had accumulated for quite some time, and the same is true of the smaller 2-1/2 acre parcel. He steted that it is, unfortunate that people ille- gally dump, but the property owner is responsible for their property. Commissioner Voss stated that if anything is done for the large landowners it should also be done for the small landowners, as it is a public benefit to having the property cleaned up and it is not necessarily the landowner's fault that the trash has been dumped there. He stated that he feels that it would be reasonable to have the landowner clean the property up, but for the County to waive the landfill charge. He stated that the problem is determining what material is from that property, adding that if this is done there would have to be some procedure whereby a truck that is loaded at the property would be given a pass so that when it gets to the landfill, there would be no charge. Commissioner Pistor stated that he was in agreement with Commissioner Voss, but after looking into the matter, he hesitates to completely waive the dumping fees. He stated that he would suggest that the Staff look at a graduated dumping fee in such cases. County Manager Lusk stated that he would be concerned with how many people would be coming to the County asking for this type of per- mission. Public Works Administrator Ruck stated that if mandatory collec- tion is adopted, the illegal dumping should be decreas~d in the Page 8 UII - .. - .. .. June 16, 1986 future. He stated that in this particular case, it has occurred over a long period of time without enforcement. He reported that the Road and Bridge Department spends between $75,000 and $125,000 per year picking up trash th~t has been illegally dumped along the right-of-way and they pay a tipping fee when it goes into the landfill site. He stated that any ~ees that are waived will revert back and be a cost to the taxpayers within the County. Mr. Lusk stated that fees were waived after Tropical Storm Bob es that was a public benefit that benefitted everyone. He stated that the Board needs to be very careful when they start waiving fees. Commissioner Holland stated that at one time there used to be a free pickup twice a year and there was not as much dumping and litter on the sides of the roads as there is now. He stated that at one time independent contractors were paid to do this. He indicated that the health and welfare of the public is at stake and questioned if this is the only property that has been cited? Tape '2 Commissioner Pistor strated that there are a large number of pro- perty owners that have been cited, adding that Staff could check into the excact number of citations that have been issued. Commissioner Holland stated that a property owner should not be pennlized for labor and tipping fees if he did not put the trash on his pr?perty. He stated that I!'aybe there should be a transfer station where people could dump free of -charge, noting that this might help clean up the area. 'OOK 095"~$146 Page 9 f; , . ~. , 095nr-r147 June 16, 1986 Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that Mr. Gramling is before the Board this date, based on an opinion that was rendered by Staff. He stated that Staff does not have an obligation to waive fees, especially ~hen the Board has set up certain departments to operate in an enterprise-type method. He stated that if there are I I free transfer stations, they will be paid and subsidized by people who subscribe to residential home delivery, noting that they will ultima- tely pay for higher landfill fees. He stated that he has requests on his desk from various organizations that feel that they are entitled to free landfill or free transfer station service. He stated that he has, at the Board's direction, diligently pursued both with the Sheriff's Department and the Zoning Department, the cleaning up of areas throughout the County. He stated that for staff to try and arbitrarily decide who gets free landfill service or transfer service is not at Staff's discretion, which is why this petition is before the Commission. Mr. tusk said that the fees are set on the cost of running the landfill. Commissioner Holland stated that it still comes out of the tax- pays"!) pocket, to which Mr. tusk sta~ed tha,t there is a difference bet~een a ratepayer and a taxpayer, adding that if he does not own property he does not pay property taxes, even though he may be a user of the landfill and pay tipping fees. He stated that the people that pay the landfill cost are the people that are paying the use for the Page 10 - .. .. ,-""....._--,-,---"-~-,._~._,,~..,-,.._~ , ","r ~ ',' . June 16, 1986 landfill, like the man that pays $96 a year to have his trash picked up. He stated that if these fees are waived, the people that are Mr. Gremlin9 stated that it is a question of who is going to pay and it is not f~ee to anyone and he feels that in a situation like this, the dumping fees should be distributed as the trash is not his client's and was not deposited on the property by him. He stated that the community as a whole is benefitting. Mr. Lusk stated that it is not the community as a whole that is paying this fee, it is the people that are paying the cost at the landfill, which does not necessarily mean the community as a whole. Commissioner Holland stated that an assumption is being made that only people that ere not paying are the ones dumping, because there are a lot of people that are landowners that get tired of going to the landfill and having it closed. Mr. Gramling stated that his client is simply asking for a one- time waiver as once the property is cleaned up, it would be much ' ., easier to maintain the property end comply with the Zoning Ordinance. He noted that for the last several years the enforcement has not been available, which is not entirely the fault of the landowner. Commissioner Pis tor questioned if County Manager Lusk has given en~ consideration to a graduated fee depending on the quantity, to which Mr. Lusk stated that he feels that the solution to the problem is mandatory garbage where everyone pays. He stated that there could be real problems with graduated fees, adding that if the Commission ~. \ lOOK 095,.~r,!148 Page 11 '~__~_''''''_"''_·'·~,·_'''__"'m.." «·,"..._,,,,.,'<,·;,..."N.....""',....,~";¡;.,~....~, "4__..'..,'_...............'''__......._..."..__''...'''''''..__·"..''"''''",'.".."> i:f.:C: , :~:~ ltJ·,;u "~ ., ~~~¡: ~ ~''¡t' ~. ·t· -. 095 149 :~:.. nr,'{' ~ ~¿. '¡ ·"1 .J t { June 16, 1986 would like him to look at something like this, he will do it, but he f.els that a graduated fee could be u.ed after mandatory collection. Commissioner Pistor stated that he would not like to waive the fees because there are a lot of other citations that have been issued and those fees would have to be waived, also. Commissionel Holland stated that Staff does not have the authority or the desire to set a precedent in this case or any other case, adding that it is up to the Commission. He stated that he would like to have Staff look at what the actual cost would be to allow everyone to clean up for a one month period and dump said material at the land- fill without charge. Mr. Lusk stated that they are trying to prevent the person that is paying $96 a year from carrying the !total burden of the cost of the landfill. He stated that if what Commissioner Holland is suggesting is approved, then an appropriation needs to be made from the General Fund to Solid Waste if it is a benefit to all of the people in the County. He stated that it is unfair for the person that is now paying the cost to assume a larger burden. He noted that if it is going to bs done County-wide, it should come from a County-wide source, which is ad valorem general fund, and then it would be fair. Commissioner Hasse stated that it might be a good idea to have a week or two to clean up in the County before the mandatory collection is instituted. fI. stated that he does not like the idea of waiving fees for each individual that comes before the Board, because he does Page 12 "~.",~,_..,,,,,,.._---,,,..... .".. .I, ___ __'~'""""'~^' . ~- . June 16, 1986 not like having to pay for someone else to be able to dump their trash for nothing. Mr., Lusk stated that if there is a clean up period, it should be done right after mandatory trash collection is adopted and then everyone would be paying for it, but if it is done now only the users would be paying unless the money is appropriated from the general fund. Commissioner Pistor stated that before any tipping fee is elimi- nated, he would like to see a graduated fee looked into. Commissioner Goodnight stated that there are a lot of property owners that have this same problem, adding that using a graduated fee would be the best compromise that the County could make at this time. Commi..ioner Goodnight moved, .econded by commissioner pistor, that starr be directed to look into qraduated tees on large properties that have been oited and report back to the Board. Commissioner Voss questioned if Mr. Gramling's client has started to clean up the property, to which Mr. Gramling replied negatively, adding that his client is waiting the outcome of this meeting. . Commissioner Holland stated that he could not support this motion because it is going to be discrimination, adding that the large pro- perty owners get a break and the small property owners have to pay. Mr. tusk stated that the graduated fee should be based on the r.¿. ~mcunt of tonnege and not the size of the property. Commissioner Voss stated he does not like the graduated fee, , ' &DOK 09Sp)Q 150 Page 13 ,,---~--"'-".,",~- > _i , , J'" " ",.. ",," ¡¡;'. ;.;:, :'¡;t ";', ~ .'i' 4. jR;:: "OIlJ/ 0958,'.£ 151 tl'" · u~ .... ,. J:-., ,t~ ,~. 1<1' .~.' ., ,. . '. {j;t;.' June 16, 1986 adding that he likes the suggestion of having a clean up period at the expense of the owner, with the dumping fee being waived. He stated that he would exclude land-clearing debris and construction material from this cleanup period. Upon oall f"r the qu..tion, the .otion taU.d 2/3, (Co_issioners Vo.., ROlland, .nd R..s. oppo..d). Tape 13 commission.r VO.. .ov.d, ..cond.d by co_is.ion.r Bo11.nd, th.t st.ff be direct.d to waive dumping f... for the fir.t two weeks of July for . oleanup period for property owners, excluding oonstruction ..teri.1. and 1.nd-c1e.ring ..teri.1s; that it not interfere with the regul.r dumping fe.. of the franchi.e dealer.; .nd that Staff work out the detaU.. Mr. Lusk stated that he would like to recommend that before the Commission implements this to have Staff come back with a fiscal impact on what it will cost the present ratepayer. Commissioner Holland stated that it would be beneficial to the County es a whole to have a two week period to encourage people to clean up their properties. Mr. tusk stated that he would not have a problem if someone would ap9ropriate some money from the Coun~y~wide General Fund to pay for thio, but et this time, the Commission ift asking for the ratepayer to cerry the cost of this free two weeK period. Upon 0.11 for the question, the motion carried uranimous1y. Page 14 - - - June 16, 1986 commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that Staff determine the additional cost and fiscal impact on the landfill operation for the two week period and brinq a report back to the Board after vacation to determine if the 80lid Waste Department should be compensated from the General Fund to its full extent. commissioner Voss moved, .econded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that Neapolitan Enterprise. be qiven until the end of the two week period to clean up their property. It.. '7 PETITIO. MP-.I-3C, RODRICK LZWIN REQUlSTING AN 8' VARIANCE FROM THB REQUIUD UAR YARD SBTBAClt OF 20' TO 12' FOR PROPERTY AT 861 SHALLOW POIN'1'B (NAPLES BATH AND TBNNIS CLtnI) - APPROVED Planner Week~ stated that the objective of this petition is to receive an eight foot rear yard setback variance to allow construction of a 9 foot by 12 foot addition to sn existing single-family resi- dence. < He noted that the property is located On the north side of Swallow pointe near the end of a cul-de-sac in Naples Bath and Tennis Club PUD. He stated that the lot is irregular in shape and backs up onto a lake/common area, adding that the petitioner proposes to construct the addition to the northwest corner of the èxisting resi- dence. He noted that it would be virtually unnoticeable to the adja-, . <. . ,. , f·;. 'f, ;', """':- cent lot owner because of the l~cation of the house and existing;"~;"~:' tit vegetation. He reported that according to Section 7.27.j of the Zoning Ordinance, the BCC upon recommendation by the Planning Page IS lOOK 095,aQ 152 , .·,,·c,"·,,_,,;"~______"'_"-"""'·"··'" JOD( 095m!l53 June 16, 1986 Commission, may approve minor changes and amendments to PUD's, adding that it is staff's opinion that this setback reduction is a minor change. He reported that this request would not have a detrimental effect upon adjacent properties and would not change the character of the neighborhood or the PUD. He stated that the CCPC held their public hearing and recommended approval. He indicated that a letter I I in favor of this variance was received from the developer of the Naples Bath and Tennis Club. Co-=i..ioner Ha.se moved, .econded by Commi..ioner Holland and carried unanimou.ly, that Petition MP-8.-3C, ROdriok Lewin, reque.ting an .' varianoe froa the required rear yard setback of 20' to 12' for property at "1 Shallow pointe be approved. , Ite. f8 PUBLIC DARING SCHEDULED FOR NOVEJœZR 18, 19", '1'0 DAR '1'HJI WOODLANDS PUD AND DRI ',' Plannel" McKim stated that Staff is requesting the DRI public hearing date for the Woodlands be set for November 18, 1986, adding that they have received the sufficiency statement from the Southwest ; . '. , " '. ~;; ¡',!) ¡' P .~i Florida Regional Planning Council. She stated that it is scheduled to ( {;, : . t .,~ ~ . ; . ' ' go to the SWFRPC in August end then the Planning Commission and the I B~ßrd after that. Commissioner Voss .oved, .econded by commissioner Hasse and " '-J -, ~a?rled unanimously, that the pUblio hearing be .cheduled for November .' I. 18, 1986, for the Woodlands PUD and DRI. ";,, "~'; IJ r'.\ : -'Iii':; ¡;I;q , Page 16 - - - ,~._-",-_.._-,,,,,..._,,,,,--...,.,,......._,,--,,,-,,.._~-,..._._......,,.-~- --_.,....."",."""_.~.".~ ~ J"~" A~'", :i:';'. 1 ¥.~,~"" ~;,¡ . r.:: . 'f,' ..' ";\: I """"';"}, ~;,'t!.".;." tft~ " June 16, 1986 %tea U 8TUI' DIUCTED '1'0 PUPARE TJœ NOR'l'B NAPLES PARlt AREA DRAINAGE IHPROVEHENT HSTU ORDINANCB AND SCHEDULB SAM!: I'OR 7/29/86, MEETING Public Works Administrator Kuck stated that the objective of this item is to create the North Naples Area Drainage Improvement MSTU, eddin9 that the f'ples Park area has historically suffered from poor drainage as a result of initial development not providing an adequate drainage design or drainage system. He stated that the County, over the years and as funds have permitted, has performed maintenance-type clean-outs of swales and has installed numerous cross drains and driveway culverts. He noted that this type of work is considered routine maintenance and will never provide the necessary drainage improvements that the residents have requested. He reported that as a result of the comments received from the North Naples Park residents during the Board's review of the Beachwalk project on May 27, 1986, staff was requested to provide a recommendation and method to improve dreinage. He noted that in compliance with this request, staff is req~esting that the BCC consider the creation of the North Naples Pa~k Drainage Improvement MSTU, adding that this proposed district m~y be created by three affirmative votes of the BCC. He stated that staff is proposing the creation of this district as well as a prelimi- rary ~ngin~erin9 ~esi9n and ~!~~~b~li~Y,report. He stated, tha~ ~taff,;~~~ is elso recommending that they be authorized to advertise for Requests . for Proposals from consulting engineers to prepare the design and lOOK 095"A'.r154 Page 17 ':'." ¡ ·-·".'_yM' 'N'¡'~ ,__w_·_.."'"'''''' . f" \, ; \.J" .. ¡" ,. . ~. i June 16, 1986 feasibility report, which is estimated to cost $75,000 - $IOO,OOO and would be paid for by a special ad valorem tax levied egainst the pro- posed district. He noted that the proposed district boundaries would be U.S. 41 on the east, lllth Avenue on the north, Vanderbilt Lagoon I···· I - . dt'.on. the west, and "anderbilt Beach Road on the south. He stated that ~. !.·~·;'¡:I~~~ude~ within this proposed District are 4,4~5 platted lots and IJ ~...' ~!' fþ- ~~' '.' ~f "", ~'. tax parcels, adding that the tax par~els include the Pavilion Shopping Center and the Beachwalk project. He noted that Staff recommends that an ordinance creating the North Naples Park Area Drainage Improvement MSTU be prepared, advertised, and brought before the BCC on July 29, 1986, for consideration and execution. Commissioner Voss stated that this was poorly done to begin with and the people deserve a lot better than what they have, adding that it is imperative that they go ahead with this. Commi.sioner vo.. moved, .eoonded by Commissioner Hasse and oarried unanimou.ly, that Staff be direoted to prepare the North .aple. Park Area Drainaqe Improvement MSTU ordinance and .chedule same for BCC consideration at the July 29, 19'1, meetinq. Item no LBASE AGREEMENT BBTWEBN BCC AND FLORIDA AEROLIGHTS, INC. TO BB EXECUTED UPON MR. ~ HAVING PRoor or INSURANCE SATISPACTORY TO THE RISK MANAGER AND IP SAID PROOP OP INSURANCE IS NOT SUBMITTED BY JUNE 17, uu, COtlNTY ATTORNBY TO ADVISB kR. Kt1HN BY LETTER THAT HE HAS 15 DAYS TO PROVIDB SUCH PROOF OR SAID LEASE WILL NOT BE EXECUTED _ APPROVED. Public Works Administrator Ruck stated that the objective of this petition is to approve and execute the Lease Agreement between the _:~': ~. ¡.~ ~. .., ~,~ ~""" :,- ','- ~. ,W f,';,..... Î!~; '(. ., .it ;,¡-,;;,,~. ,11\~~ ;J' Page 18 - - - ,. June 16, 1986 Board and Florida Aerolights, Inc. He stated that Florida Aerolights has corrected all violations of the existing Lease Agreement except for providing insurance certificates sufficient to cover all Florida Aerolights activities. He reported that Staff has met with Mr. Kuhn and his attorney, Mr.Bruner, as requested by the Board and negotiated a new lease agreement. He noted that the lease term will be one year with the option '0 renew and Staff has given Mr. Kuhn time until the June 17th Board meeting to provide the Board and its staff proof of insurance. He stated that if Mr. Kuhn cannot provide property insurance at this time, it is recommended that the Board order their County Attorney to write a letter giving Florida Aerolights IS days to prove such insurance and pay any and all back rent. He reported that if after 15 days, Mr. Kuhn has failed to supply proper insurance cer- tificates and/or sufficient rent, then it is recommended that the Board order the County Attorney to terminate Florida Aerolights Lease ~9rèement. Risk Manager Rynders ststed that she received a copy of the e:<lstlng policy from Mr. Kuhn's ettorney, but it was not complete, ,. adding that there were exclusions rather than additions and therefore, Mr. Kuhn does not have any insurance for ultra-light operations. County Attorney Cuyler stated that Mr. Bruner understands the ~:!.mpact' of not having the insura~ce,' adding that he was' complimentary .- of the Staff and their cooperation. He stated that he is aware that without the insurance the BCC cannot approve the lease. " Page 19 ~ril" (r~' ~. 1,'._ aDDK 095 ,~r·t 156 ;( .., i: ',~~t.' :"."; , <, 'I:~r, ":.,', t,.'.',. " ¡"', .. '" , \. '" :,I' "I'" '. '~",-,'.' if "~ I:" I" .' ,~~ ?ì, I"" , !ii, ,,' 'I,',',' . .,,;.' . ';q-', Ê"" " t, :f:... 095""d.57 ¡r.. ~,,:, ~r, r'" ~( , n' ¡" \JI.. June 16, 1986 Ms. Pat Carroll, Engineering Department, stated that the back rent has been paid and is, therefore, no longer an issue. Commi.sioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Has.e and carried unanimou.ly, th.t tbe BCC ex. cute the L.... Agr.em.nt upon Mr. Kuhn having proof of in.uranc. .ati.factory to the Risk Manager and if proof of insuran~. is not .ubmitted, it i. r.oommended that a lett.r be .ent to Mr. Kuhn .dvising him that h. has 15 days to provide such proof of insurance. Ite. 111 BID ~R PURCHASB OJ' PROPBR'1'1' LOCA'l'BD 01f '!'HI CORNZR OJ' COLORADO AVENUI AND SBCOND STREBT IN IMMOKALEI - APPROVED J'OR PURCHASE IN THB AMOUNT OJ' '11,000 BY MR. NEALY Public Works Administrator Kuck stated that this was requested to be removed from the consent agenda to the regular agenda because in the original agenda package, it shows that only one bid was received when actually there were two received. He stated that this is to ac~apt bids for the purchase of the p~operty located On the corner of Cölorado Avenue and Second Street in Immokalee. He noted that the above-mentioned property was purchased by the BCC on February 7, 1950, for use as a Sheriff's Substation and retention building, but since that time, the County has relocated the Sheriff's Substation and retention facilities leaving the site vacant and abandoned. He stated that on February 11, 1986, the Board declared the property surplus and ordered the staff to dispose of the parcel. He noted that an appraisal was made on the property with a value of $13,000. He stated Page 20 - - - ----~.~''''.,'~.,. ..-.....-....-.--.."".""'..". June 16, 1986 that he received a bid from Mr. Nealy for $ll,OOO and one from Shelly and Lera Carter in the amount of $7,500 and he is recommending that the BCC accept the bid from Mr. Nealy in the amount of $ll,OOO. Commis.ioner Bolland moved, .econded Þy commi.sioner Goodnight and carried unanimou.ly, that the Bid for the property at the oorner of Colorado Avenue and Second street in Immokale. Þe accepted from Mr. .ealyin the amount of $11,000. ': ~. Tape U It.. 112 MARCO ISLARn COMMUKITY PARK - BID '85-'70 FOR SITZWORK AND PAVING _ AWARDBD TO BETTER ROADS, INC. FOR $~5,207.50. BID '85-971 FOR BUILDINGS AND IITB BLECTRIC - AWARDED TO MOLLEHHAUZR FOR $548,200. BID '81-972 FOR LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION - AWARDED TO SUNNY GROVE LANDSCAPING, INC. FOR $132,971.'0 ,_ f; Legal notice having been published in thè Naples Daily News on April 25, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, bids were received for sitework for the Marco Island Community Park until 2130 P.M., May 16, 1986. Tape U Public Services Administrator O'Donnell stated that specifications wore prepered by Wilson, Miller, Barton, SolI & Peek, Inc. He stated that the total of the apparent low bidders was $950,825.90, noting that this did not leave an adequate contingency and the design team reviewed the items for possible deductions. He tegy used by the Design Team "to.make the reductions was to ùtilize Marco Island Community Park Priority List, which was reviewed and ~ '" ¡ ; ~'¡ """ I' ,+ r:L': ."".",1.-' ~;~:. '.:: '''' r; ,} ~.': Page 21 aOOK 095pm158 l: ....""'_--...,.. '-'''~''----'--''''-'' ~}..: . v. tK 095",,1511 0" 'í!;',.' t· .':. í~' t, J ..:'./.. ¡ I', .' j. June 16, 1986 approved by both the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board and the Board and to retain in the construction budget the items of highest priority, while cutting items near the bottom of the list. He noted that funds have been appropriated in the Capital Improvements Fund 306. He noted lhat a total of the low bid after deletions by the Design Team and approved by the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board amounts to $917,384.50, which will allow for a contingency of $33,615.50. He indicated that the bids and the recommendation for awarding same is listed in the Executive Summary dated June 16, 1986. Commissioner Voss stated that it does not seem that $33,000 is I much of a contingency, to which Deputy As~istant County Manager Brangaccio stated that this is very similar to the amounts that the other parka have had, adding that the largest Change Order to date has been $7,000 which is for Immokalee. She noted that the Change Orders hhv~ been kept down and most contingencies have been between $20,000 end $30,000. Commissioner Voss moved, seconde~,~ Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that Bid '8'-970 for sitework and paving for ðevelopment of Marco Island Community Park be awarded to Better Roads, Inc. in the amount of $aI6,207.'0; that Bid '86-971 for buildings and site eleotric for Maroo Island community Park be awarded to Mollenhauer in the amount of $548,200; and that Bid '86-972 for landsoaping and irrigation for Marco Island community Park be awarded to Sunny Grove Landscaping, Ino. in the amount of $132,976.90. Page 22 ... ~ .. June 16, 1986 It.. 113 '1'KB 1983 850,000 POOR CORPORATIOlf DOml.TIOH FOR GOLDIH GATB COMMUNITY PARK '1'0 BB U'l'ILIZID OH ADDITIOml.L LANDSCAPING BY CHANGB ORDBR '4 IN FOR $34,445.'0 TO MCGOVBRH CONSTRUCTIOH CORP. - ~PPROVBD Public Services Administrator O'Donnell stated that this is to gain approval of $34,445.60 for a Change Order to McGovern Con.truction Corporation to do additional land.caping at Golden Gate Community Park, adding that $50,000 was donated by Power Corporation to be used at e'lden Gate Community Park for site improvements and equipping of the park in a manner thet is above and beyond the antici- pated improvments of the park. He noted that earlier the Design Team had earmarked the balance of the $50,000 totaling $15,554.40 to go towards a portion of the mounding, landscaping and irrigation in the initial contract. He noted that now that the park is nearing comple- tion, the De.ign Team recommend. that the additional $34,445.60 of the donation be applied towards additional landscaping. He noted that Mr. Peek contacted the donor and the donor was in agreement that the addi- tion3l land.caping would be an appropriate use. He noted that funds f~~ the $50,000 donation have been included in the monies established IJnder Fund 306 and they are currently earning interest to the amount of $11,526.81 which by the terms of the donation would be returned to the donor. Commi..ioner VO.. aoved, ..oond.d by Commi..ion.r B.... and carri.d un.nimou.1y, that the 1;83 $50,000 Power Corporation donation for Golden Gate community Park b. utilized on additional 1and.caping 'I, C,' : ¡:¡~: i r';.JJ· " ~ ~ -!',' . ,),~ ~,' r ':':' ¡;; 1;: .J of ~ " ,.' . , i." J ':!i;:.o 1 i!J' .j;j \ ~. Page 23 " lOOK 095 PAr.t 160 0951'1r,t 161 I', p'p". nm (. '0 i , 1,.rJ~) (j: June 16, 1986 tbrouqb tbe approval of cbanqe Order '4 in tbe amount of $34,445.60 to MoGovern construction corporation. ~ ;1 r ¡ r ; ¡ ~ ~ (~ (.ì~1.!·. r:I)(O,,' j.,)j . å;¡I;' ~. ¡ :: ~: Ç::.<t:f1;fJ:t'.,.Cl1.t.: IJFf." : ".J' ':¡j,"-:.ouqoq p;" (, t, t'. j .,; ;.:.t·¡:~ l. jí'~''': J ~ ~ '.1 ,.. 1: "~ ...! ~ 7 ,'. È .M. ~. , ; ô!p4r¡ \-!. .',.', \J r¡' \.., ~H.: .iL 'i.' , ,uq, " v 9':'1 ') , v: l .;P' (: .i. ,'" ~~ L . r.;10 ," : ~ : J', v'·,; f..';¡'. j; ç" ':":' . >, . ;:::' (¡:'j .' ðO ~ , . d' r(: ;;; '~ 1: ." " . " '¡'iW,'J t ,,-~!L' ~ r.t~ " , :f ,(: :e¡ ,;, ,-t '1ÇJ~'t. ~, f , :! Jt¡t. ,~<:, '!p {;~ r',~" - .......~.~ ~:~ i 'j r' ': , . ~ ''; j. ,~ { Ii' '. ~~;~(~ \ '';....n Mt.,¡·: ~l ,L"J .-.;.. , i ~ * . .~. ' : .. ~ ' . "( .,1 ; , "" ". '? , ':_~ 1 " , ~,( :. ~·:"j·t \. j , ;; f,",i liI( J.r..' r;' . _., ;- I', l./i; T '..'-::'¡ ," ;/'.;r-;.~JL'..í;C.J.~·:j¡-; I ,}- ~ TJ,rOJiJ1f' r".t"~!t;~Cl'¡\l¡' ~(;'.)''''IJ~t.'tO¡1. [~;';'1'},:.j '.~ ,I¡~ t ¡)'~!.,;:f1 .:~ Xø~' 'I 'l'lY C 'i::;liJlt~J. ~'~, , ¡'(' 1. " , ...~ , ; \:. . '~:' . . ;:.~,~ Page 24 ¡; ;2 ,','," ,¡ b - - ~.~;:; ~tìl, .¡¡.ij :.¡. (1;1 ' r..,:; ..···,'.t;· , , ~ :f)' '"~t''' '~.' June 16, 1986 n...u UTILITIBS DrvISIO.'S ORGARIZATIOXAL CHART WITH CHANGBS AND ADDITIONS - APPROVIID Utilities Director Crandall stated that this is to seek approval of the Utilities Division personnel organizational chart, adding that the Executive Summary outlines the events leading to the changes. He stated that two vears ago, the Utilities Division consisted of a sewer treatment plant with a limited DER permit, adding that now there are four sewer treatment plants totaling 6.5 million gallons a day and two water plants that total 11.2S million gallons a day. He stated that the proposals include 3 position upgrades that have been recommended by the Personnel Department to bring them more in line with the area average and allow him to remain competitive in the hiring market. He noted that the customer service clerks would be upgraded from C-04 to C-06, upgrade the plant operators to be equal to the mechanics, one pay grade in each of the plant operator categories, and upgrade tht: Utilities Operation Director one pay grade to be equal to the u~ilities Administration Director. He stated that there is also a request for approval to hire a data processing director in the E-06 pay grade, adding that this person will head up the department needed to administer programs essociated with the recent purchase of a System 38 computer and the required software. He stated that additionally outlined is the staffing requirements for the East Naples Water System Inc. water and sewer systems, which is consistent with the terms of ¡", JDIJi( 095,.",t 164 Page 2S , . 095m;r165 ~ i . n' i' J ....¡". June 16, 1986 the agreement to purchase the East Naples system and with DER's staffing requirements outlined in the Florida Administrative Code. He stated that he is also aSking to update his Vacant Administrative Assistant position to Assistant Administrator, adding that it is his opinion that th6 Administrative Assistant position has been outgrown. He stated that he presently has five positions that are making a higher rate of pay then the Administrative Assistant was making. Commissioner Voss questioned th¡ salarr range of an E-06, to which Mr. Crandall stated that it is between $29,000 and $41,OOO but that includes the salary plus 40' benefit package. Commissioner Kolland moved, seconded by Commissioner Basse and c~£Ti.~ unanimously, that the Utiliti.. Divi.ion's Organizational Cbart with change. and additions be approved. Ite. U5 AGREEMENT nTH DELTONA '1'0 BB APPROVED BY '1'Jm COON'l'Y MANAGER IN ORDER '1'0 OBTAIN 5-1/2% INTEREST RATE REGARDING '1'XE MARCO PHASE II SEWER PROJECT OR STAFF AUTHORIZED '1'0 PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COLLECTION SYSTEM ONLY Utilities Director Crandall stated that Marco Island Utilities Phase II project for sewers was included in the effluent distribution system, adding that there are many items that need to be resolved in that agreement for service from Deltona for the effluent. He stated that he has made a proposal to Deltona in the form of a written agreement, adding that he would like to get this matter resolved. He noted that the C&S Bank has extended their proposal to loan the money ~\,-: :~ Page 26 - - .. . '. June 16, 1986 at 5-1/2' until this Friday. He stated that he is asking that if he is able to finalize a written agreement with Deltona by this Friday, that the County Manager have the euthority to approve the agreement so thet he can go forwðrd with the project and take advantage of the 5-1/2' interest rete that has been offered, and in the event that he does not reach a.. agreement with Deltona, he is aSking for approval to move forward with just the collection system and come back to the BCC at a later date when all the terms of the agreement for the effluent is worked out. He stated that he has personally made contact with Deltona and he feel~ that they ere willing to reach an agreement. Commission.r Voss mov.d, s.cond.4 by Commission.r Goodnight an4 carri.d unanimously, th~t the agr....nt with D.ltona b. approv.d by the County Manag.r in ord.r to obtain the 5-1/2% interest r.garding the Marco Phase II s.w.r project or that staff be authori.ed to proc..d with the oonstruction of the Collection syst.. only in the ev.nt that an agr....nt cannot be reached with Deltona. Ita.,lI MR. DAn I'ISCBJ:R INSTRUCTED TO IRVBSTIG7I.TB THB DRI71.BLB RATB BOND POOLS I'URTHBR AND COMB BACK TO THB BCC WITH I'ULL DET7I.ILS ON JULY 22, 1986. SMITH BARNZY SBLBCTBD AS UNDBRWRITBR FOR PROJBCT II' COUNTY DBCIDBS TO GO FORW7I.RD WITH 71. V7I.RI7I.BLB RATB CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND Mr. Dave Fischer, Financial Advisor to the County, stated that since the last meeting he has had a lot of discussion with the various investment bankers about their proposals. He referred to a hand-out that he presented indicating that a variable rate fund is similar to a , aGIIK 095 W.! 166' Page 27 i ~. 'II' I· . ¡l ~ ¿~~k U95,~167 , (i' j', ~ ' ¡ I '\ June 16, 1986 number of bond pools. He stated that on sizing bond issues, various departments would be surveyed as to what their needs are over the next 3 years, adding that the total of this amount would be the amount of the bond issue plus an additional 15\ for a reserve account and 3.4\ for issuance CO&ts. He stated that the interest rate that is commonly y, , used for this type of fund is a weekly rate, which fluctuates on a weekly basis and the investment bankers estimate that over the life of the program, there would be a weekly borrowing rate averaging between 4-3/4\ and 7\. He stated that the cost of borrowing would be about 4.85\ in today's market. He noted that the issue begins as a fund with no draw-down in an investment portfolio of the highest grade, but as the Departments pull money for their needs, the funds would be secured like a regular bond issue, citing for example, that Utility revenues would secure Utility Capital Improvements. He stated that the length of the issue is 30 years,' adding that at any time that the the County wants to convert to a fixed rate this could be done with either the total fund or any part of the fund. He stated that b~sed on a $50 million dollar issue, the issuance cost would be about 3.4\ or $1.7 million, noting that there would also be annual cost for remarketing and liquidity insurance that regular fixed rates do not have. He stated that in order to determine remarketing and liquidity insurance cost, the current market of borrowing is used and 3/4\ is added to that. He stated that with regards tò the investment of the proceeds, en agreement would be reached with one of th~ bankers and , , Page 28 .. .. .. """'j""""~"'''''''''.'''''"'.a. "<' ,'-",,,~ ,m~" ,.."._'"'O_".....,.,",~~,~",_.u·._ , ~"'. ,....... ~) , , . Juns 16, 1986 . ì those proceeds would be invested at a gueranteed rate which would be approximately 2-1/2' greater than the borrowing cost. He stated that this would readily equal or exceed the estimated $1.7 million issuance cost. He stated that with regard to timing, this issue would have to be completed by September I, 1986, or before Congress enacts the tax bill, whichever comes first, adding that for years the County has been able to erbitrage bonds, but this will come to an end with the passage of said tax bill. He stated that some advantages to this type of funding are the availability of funds to the County departments at very low variable rates, adding that during the first three years, arbitrage earnings from the investment of the proceeds would probably earn enough money to pay for the issuance costs. He noted that this type of financing works well for funds with a slow draw-down which increases the investment earnings. He indicated that disadvantages are not having the comfort of fixed rates and during disrupted markets it is difficult to convert from variable to fixed rates. He noted that another disadvantage is the additional cost involved with fixed rates, which could be absorbed through investment earnings. He noted that in this particular case where the County does not have projects ready to go, but they do have long-term needs, this particular type of financing would suit the County very well. He stated that pools are very common, adding that if it was not for the proposed tax bill, this , " - . ... ¡ ~c r t ,".!.: ,- . f ¡ -.-' i .. would become a common way to finance over the next five years. He stated that there are only five or six firms that do this type of ',.,1., Page 29 IODK 095,Jr,r168 ,1\,' , , ",,__I~II"·II Æf· i'~··;·.·'.·":',,: . ".'" ..,' '""'; '0' ··.1·.·.'··· .\ ~. ~ -, 0, , ¡ " -,>Þ' i'i., I¡~i.~ ¡ £ ..... ~~'.'~ , '.' ..'> ,.i~,( . 'u" !t(.; , t' lOOK 095I'Jr.r169 . (1')")' It :. June 16, 1986 financing because of the daily trading that ls involved. He noted that requests for proposals were sent to PaineWebber, Smith Barney, First Boston, and Merrill Lynch, with three responding. He stated I that after evaluation of the proposals, Smith Barney was selected as the number One tirm by the Selection Committee. He stated that by , the time the Board comes back from vacation, Smith Barney will be ready to present a good program to the Board for evaluation that will indicate what this type of funding could do for the County as well as what the fees would be. Tape IS ~ ., In answer to Commissioner Voss, Mr. Fischer stated that he believes that after three years the County would lose the arbitrage. Commissioner Hasse questioned if there is a guarantee of 2-1/2t that the County would get back, to which Mr. Fischer stated that during negotiations this amount would be guaranteed, adding that the 2-1/2t was simply an estimate for example purposes. Commissioner Voss stated that Mr. Fischer is simply aSking for authorization this date to work out the details, to which Mr. Fischer confirmed, adding that the Board would have another chance to accept or reject proposals. Mr. Fischer stated that if all estimates come back and they total $50 million, this does not give each department the right to draw- down what they want, adding that they have to come to the Board for approval to do this. He stated that this is a good fund and draws interest while it is sitting there. Page 30 - .. - ""''''''---''"'-- Junl! 16, 1986 County Manager Lusk steted that the projects that shculd be involved in this type of funding would be those that are sat up as enterprise funds because the rates will pay the bonds off in the future. He stated that as tar as utilities, the Commission needs to choose which bond route they want'to,take with regards to capital pro- jectsthat ere [?rthcoming. . .'. ,11,' ~. '. " ( County Manager Lusk stated thet with variable rates, the rates for .ewer end water need to be set higher in case the variable rate goes up during the year. Commissioner vo.. moved, seconded by commissioner Qoodnight and carried unanimously, that Mr. ~ischer be instructed to investiqate the .ariable rate bond pool. further and come back to the Board with full details on July 22, l,a,. co..issioner Goodniqht moved, seconded by Commi..ioner Voss and carried unanimously, that smith Barney be selected a. tbe underwriter for the project if the County decide. to qo forward with a variable rate capital improvement fund. It.. 117 CONTRACT WI'l'B DIfDBRBOIf, YOtTHG , COMPAIfY I'OR TIm CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BLEHlINT OJ' TIm COMPREHENSIVE PLAØ, NOT TO EXCEED $U ,000 - APPROVED Deputy Assistant County Manager Brangaccio stated that on June 3, 1986, a development plan was presented to the Board for the Growth Management Act, adding that part of that strategy is to spread out the development of the elements over the next two years. She stated that .. Page 31 eOOK 095 PA'.r 170 _.~"-""'----,---,,..""'" e.._'''''''__...';O<.....,.",.,.'''"'''......~,~..,,''.·.',.L''''"....,..,··'._,'" '."",'~" .",. -.~.._,,----- I·),··..~··.>··.··· ._'1 ·...~...I' . 'tf ~\. aD. 095 P1(;£ 171 ~~.. -,; ".. Y- ':' r..' 1~;~' . MJ'¡', ... . ';;" (PJ JlU"" ~ . "I .. June 16, 1986 the Capital Improvement Element is the key to the new Growth Manage- ment Element in that it looks at exactly what the Infrastructure Com- mittee has done and this information is then utilized and built on to develop levels of standards for all fecilities that the Board contri- butes to. She atated that then a five year CIP plan is done based on planning districts, which is where the growth will be concentrated on during that five years. She stated that the feasibility financial plan will determine what infrastructure can be built in those planning districts end what Development Orders could be issued. She reported that Staff negotiated with what they fe:t was the most qualified firm out of the five firms that responded. She noted that Staff is recom- mending the firm of Henderson,. Young' Company to develop the Capital Improvement Element in three phases beginning on July I, 1986, and be completed in 10 months. She noted that the three phases are the Data Collection and Analysis, the Capital Improvement Projects, and the Goals, .Objectives and policies, which will end up as a total· element that will be submitted to the Division of Community Affairs. She stated that the ectual contract amount will be $86,000 over the next 10 months. commi.sioner Goodni~ht moved, .eooDded by commi..ioner VO.. aDd carried unanimously, that the contract with Kender.on, Young , Company for the Capital Improvement Element of the Comprehenaive Plan, not to exceed $8',000, be approved. '.; ',; i\ . > ;' f., i ,,I'., ] " j,' Page '32 (- - - .. ._""----_..""'-~_.~-,.";._.,, . ,._"..~..,---,-_.-._....~ ,...",,,,-",,,.,,,,.,,,,,;,-,.---,,-,,- ,-,.,""--,----- - - - ... "f.; .~. " '~g' ~! 1~'~ C ~~~;~/ ' ;~:t' :¡J"¡',' ~~'~i-' ;,' , Ite. 118 RBPOR'l' FROM INl"RASTRt1C'l't1RB COMMI'l"l'BB - NO AC'l'ION 'l'AUN June 16, 1986·'~ 3t Mr. Stan Whitcomb, Chairman of the Infrastructure Committee, stated that he .as very pleased with the Committee, adding that there were representatives of various groups from allover the community. He noted that in getting to infrastructure it was felt that the broad picture over the next five years needed to be addressed and not just specific items. He stated that a written report will be submitted in the near future. He reported that one of the biggest concerns was the State-mandated Growth Management Plan, adding that some assumptions had to be made regarding this matter. He noted that a capital impro- vement plan process was established and they felt that it was their task to recommend funding sources and requirements and then to propose a policy for the future capital improvement plan reviews. He stated that the Growth Management Plan mandated by the State covers road construction, utilities, parks and recreation, water management, natural resources, bUildings, lands, and related equipment, and spe- cial heavy equipment. He stated that from the State level, mass tran- sit and solid waste were also addressed, but the Committee did not address those items. He noted that they also addressed debt require- ment. He stated that after he goes through his review, the Committee would be available for workshop'sessions with the Commissioners and Staff to determine the timing, alternate methods of iundi~g, and what .. could be delayed and what should not be delayed. He stated that with Page 33 ~O( 095plr.!178 " ,"~"""..~_;~,,,,__,,,,_"".4-0\'"""""""'"''"''''' .,. _"'."~'''''''''''''_''''~'';'"'~''~''o<..,_.",,,.",,,.,,.,,,,,->,,,,-,,-,_,,..',.~." '-'-,' ~,,"'".,..,-"" ..-.-......--.....,..-- 095 PAf,t 179 ; ¿~ June 16, 1986 regards to road construction and utilities, it is the committee's opi- nion that with respect to these uses, there should be no ad valorem taxes. He stated that the ten-year needs were estimated at $8.8 million a year as determined by the MPO and Lochner report and the Infrastructure Committee felt that the needs would be $7 million. He stated that if t,~ Lochner plan is used, there may be a shortfall of , $1.8 million a year. He stated that if additional gas taxes are approved, he would recommend that an additional 3 cent gas tax be ini- tiated as this would take care of all the needs of the Lochner report over the next five years. He stated that with respect to Utilities, there is a $100 million need for five years for sewer and water. He stated that he urges that no ad valorem taxes be used for this, that it be user fees and assessments and to cover the periods of time when a plant is built, he would suggest bonding as there is a source of revenue to payoff the bonds. He noted that with respect to Parks & Recreation, there was always a lack of commitment to adequate funding in this area. He stated that there is an additional need to meet the master plan developed for the five community parks and that is in the magnitude of $7.7 million. He stated that $4.1 million was deleted from that list which was for civic centers, gymnasiums, and pools because there should be an analysis made of the on-going costs and how those costs would be funded to maintain these items. He stated that it may be proper to go to the various districts and have a taxing district in that area for those specific items. He noted that there ¡ ; , : .¡ . ',; l' Page 34 - - - """,___~._",4<1'" ! I' June 16, 1986 is actually $3.6 million needed in the next two years. He stated that in addition to the $3.6 million, there is $1.S million needed for improvements to existing parks end facilities throughout the County. He stated that in the outer years, year 4 or S, there may be a need for an edditiona\ park, but that depends on what is mandated by the Growth Managemont Act. He stated that to fill the current needs, this should be done with ad valorem taxes. '1'ape II Mr. Whitcomb stated that Water Management seemed to be the greatest need and a plan implementation is needed now in order to pro- tect the potable supply and minimize flooding. He noted that the total needs were $18 million over the next five years, but $7 million is funded by developers, property owners, Big Cypress Basin Board, contributions and road improvement fees that bring it back to a five year requirement of $ll million that would have to come from other sources. He noted that the Capitel Improvement funding would need to be $2.2 million a year. He stated that there are items in all these areas that can be postponed. He ·stated that impact fees were eva- luated and it was felt that the needs that are outlined are catch-up, and new developments should pay for whatever they create and are doing so. He stated that Immokalee was not addressed in this figure for water management. He noted that with respect to Natural Resources, it was felt that there is a need for ,acquisition, protection and renova- tion of beaches and pollution should be eliminated in all the water- &DDK 095 PAGE 180 Page 35 ".----'.-..". , "~""".."".¡;,,,,".'.,._~oo....~., ,_ "".. ..,..... >0".>_"'" "...." ,,,.......,.._,~,,.,"~.- _'...·'_N.'-'"'~..-"".·,.··,_··"___ i: . I 'j ¡ June 16, 1986 ways and the recreational waterways should be kept navigable and safe. He stated that the plan has not been developed, but $1.5 million a year is not out of line for what needs to be done on an on-going program. He stated that these funds would come from ad valorem taxes, municipal service texing units, and state and federal grants. He noted that with regards to buildings, lands, and related equipment, it , I i is felt that the ~urrent commitments should be completed and then the needs over the next five years would require $35 million. He noted that there is presently unfunded needs for about $19 million. He stated that a figure of $7 million a year seems to be reasonable in terms of growth of this County, which brings it to a total of $40 million and it wes determined that there were sources of $5 million from existing bonds, revenue sharing, and interest. He noted that it waD unanimous that bonds should not be used to fund facilities that do not pay for themselves. He noted that in enterprise funds wh~re there are sources of revenue and user fees, bonding could be done. He stated that sales tax revenue should not be pledged, adding that the County should reach a point where the sales tax revenue could be used on an annual basis to build needed items. He indicated that short- term planning is the nature of heavy and special equipment, which is for helicopters, landfill operations~ and road and bridge maintenance" adding that this cost runs about $1.S million a year. He referred to debt retirement, noting that it is important to use the sales tax revenues to start paying off the debts that the County has now in " Page 36 , . .. .. .. -- June 16, 1986 order to get to the point where the County can use the sales tax reve- nue to support the pay-as-you-go. He stated that his proposal would be to fund debt retirement with sales tax revenue that is not com- mitted to bonds and ad valorem taxes and that would be $1.S million a year. He noted that two areas that were not addressed were mass tran- sit and solid waste, adding that they felt that there is adequate transportation for the sick and older citizens and therefore, mass transit was not addressed. He stated that solid waste was not addressed because the County is in the process of working out a solid waste program and it would be redundant for the committee to also work on it. He stated that Fire Districts were not covered, adding that they were discussed and it was determined that there should be a study on the possible consolidation of Fire Districts. He stated that they did not feel that they should get involved with the School Board needs. He stated that there is $IS.S million for the overall needs of the County on en annual basis, edding that it would be their proposal that after this is set up, that the funds be segregated so that the monies are not used for purposes other than for what they are intended. He stated that 2 mills of additional taxes should be set up specifically for capital improvements, adding that this is a big increase over the l/lO of a mill in the plan, but if the needs are going to be taken care of, this is what is needed. He stated that the , , repeated consensus of the Committee has been that bonding should be relied upon as a source of building funds only for pro~ects that can lOOK 095 PAi;E 182 Page 37 Ud.J I : ¡ ~...."....."",-"""..."--~~.,~.,,,,,,..,,,,,,,-,,..~~~- <'..-- "'j - lOOK 095 PACt 183 June 16, 1986 . . f¡") ¡PI ¡ (L rely on user revenue for payback of interest and principle, and in addition, the new State Growth Management requirement mandates that the County look far beyond the needs for Capital Funding over the next five years and when revenue is pledged for 15 to 20 or 30 years to fund non-income projects, it will create renewed cr~sis funding needs ,: I' that the County ~as been experiencing in the past. He stated that the Committee recommends that the question of a $2 million ad valorem tax for capital improvement funds be addressed and placed in the current budget, and that no further pledging of sales tax revenues be used for the issuancs of bonds. He stated that he would have the final report available within the next 30 days. He stated that they would be willing to meet with Staff and the Commission to workshop any of the items. Commissioner Pistor questioned how much of the sales tax has been committed and for how long, to which-Clerk Giles stated that around $3.5 to $4 million ja the annual debt service and the ace has already approved adding an additional $4 million if it is refunded. He stated that close to $5 million is brought in. County Manager Lusk questioned if the ad valorem taxes and the MSTU's are used for the Community parks, would that be considered double taxation and could the MSTU's take the burden of that increase, to which Mr. Whitcomb stated that he did not know if they could. Commissioner Pistor stated that this is something that Clerk Giles should look into in the next couple of weeks. ; r"" j .;); Page 38 - - - '··'e,".__'_~""""·"'"""--'···""'''·'·'~ .' ~ ..."....".._>'.~,..-..,"._."-,,-,---- June 16, 1986 Mr. Lusk stated that becau.e of the Growth Management Act, he would hope that the Infrastructure Committee could be the committee that the County has to use as mandated by law over the next couple of YFlars. ***** Reo..sl 11:55 ~.M. - R.oonv.neðl 2:00 P.M. at whioh time Deputy Clerk Rui. replaoed Deputy Clerk Kenyon ***** Item 119 IMPLEMBNTATIOM C? TJIE "IN-HOUSE ARREST PROGRAM" TO BE UTILIZED J'OR COUNTY COURT MI~OEH!ANOR OJ'FENDERS - ~PPROVED County Attorney Cuyler stated that there is a representative from the Probation Department who will give the Commissioners background on this program and how the financing works and what some of the issues are. He added that there is a lease agreement and he cannot recommend it as it exists right now, and in the event the Board approves this, it will be subject to such changes as he deems necessary. Mr. George Drobinski from the Probation Department stated that he is making this presentation on behalf of Judge Eugene C. Turner. He added that this program is an alternative to the overcrowding of the County jails as well as the costs of housing inmates. He said the In-House Computer system will be leased from Corrections Services Inc. of West Palm Beach, Florida. The idea behind the In-House Arrest system, is that a defendant who is facing jail time and meets the cri- teria of the In-House Arrest system, is placed in the supervision of that program for a specified period of time in lieu of incarceration. He explained that the defendant wears a small electronic transmitter ¡"f, rt IDDK 095 Plq 184 Page 39 \ ¡,:, "-~,----,-,._.,,,".- ~-",,,,,-,,..''''-" .o~ 095 ra~t 185 , , , June 16, 1986 which sends a cons tent signal to a portable monitor located in the defendant's home which is on the phone, and that monitor in turns I , transmits a constant signal to a base computer which i.s located in a designated area, such as the Probation Department. Mr. Drobinski explained the predesigned program which schedules the defendant ~o a strict schedule of responsibility, such as coun- selling, a period of work per day and curfews. He added that when the defendant strays further than ISO feet from his home, the transmitter will kick back to the base computer a violator which means that the defendant must state to the officer the reason for non-compliance if the explanation is unacceptable, the defendant is taken off the program and serves the rest of the time in jail. Mr. Drobin~ki pointed out that the benefits of this program are, the defendant will be able to work, a degree of punitive punishment exists because the defendant must still follow the s~nctions imposed by the court: the stigma of jail, b~cause he realizes that should he ! . fail to conform to the conditions of this program, jail time would be immediate; the forced change of lifestyle which means that he will spend more time at home with his family, which has a positive influence on behavior. Mr. Drobinski indicated that the defendants pay for the program, not the taxpayer. He said that for the lease agreement" $7.00 must be forwarded to Corrections Services per day, per defendant. He stated that the Probation Department plans to charge each defendant $10, of. J Page 40 - - .. \~ .,.' , June 16, 1986 that $3.00 goes for general revenue (of the $3.00, $.75 goes to operating expenses), adding that any county that purchases this machine for themselves can set their own limit of payment. He said that 5 units will be used initially which when estimated over II months will gross $6,420 as compared to $7,000 for the same number of defendants for one month in jail. If the program is effective, he added, more units can be acquired, if the program does not meet the needs, then it can be terminated at any time with a 30 day notice. He indicated that the program has been successful in other places. Commissioner Voss asked if the transmitter can be taken off by the defendant? Mr. Drobinski answered the transmitter weighs only 4 oun- ces with two plastic straps and can be worn on the arm or leg, the straps are visually checked at the Probation Department at regular intervals throughout the week if the straps are cut, the defendant i. taken off the program. County Attorney Cuyler stated that the equipment will be sent to the Probation Department and if the devices are not used, there will be no cost. He stated he talked to Corrections Services and they indicated that any appropriate changes can be made to the lease agreement, which he has done. He also indicated that the Commission's approval should be subject to the County Attorney's review and any changes that he feels are necessary; 'and that it be approved by the Risk Manager because there are several insurance provisions. He said f.·, that this is a cover lease and there is a schedule attached which '00'1; 095 ''''$.186 Page 41 .~j' r, (I ~ H j:: J ~ ,..,."~,-,._.¡¡¡¡,,"-----,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;",,...,. ." ,'\t, J:;"', ,~ 1;..- j;...:'.' I' f:~ 095nttl87 r ~: :.' June 16, 1986 describes the equipment and ths price, end he would ask that the Chairman be given the authorization upon notification from the Probation Department that the equipment is in and in good working order, to execute that schedule. ':;1, In anllwer to Commissioner Pistor's question, Mr. Drobinski explained the pr~cess by which defendants ~re screened and selected for thill program, adding that more responllibility will be put on the defendant and if they purposely damage the mechanism, they can be charged with criminal mischief, and if they abscond from the program, they can be charged with grand theft. Attorney Cuyler stated that the cost involved also includes possible damage to the machine, and he will check to make sure that it is covered. Alllo, he added, the criminal court system is involved so if the defendants are less than honest about some of their activities, Judge Turner will have some degree of control over what happens. Deputy Chief Barnett stated that this will alleviate overcrowding in the jail, and the rillk factor will not be that great. Commissioner Pistor asked if Sheriff Rogers wall aware of this, and Deputy Chief Barnett answered affirmatively, adding that the Sheriff's f Department egrees with the concept because it will cut back on jail cost, which right now is $50 or $60 a day. Mr. Drobinski IItated that 20 units, each unit and monitor costing $1,895, would be $37,900, the IBM PC computer would be $18,500 for a total of $56,400, and should all 20 unitll be utilized throughout that year, the system would pay for itself. " Page 42 .. .. .. .!~ , June 16, 1986 commi..ioner vo.. aoved, .econded by commi.sioner Goodnight, to approve tbe "In-Bou.e Arre.t l'roqr.." .ubject to approval by tbe County Attorney upon his legal .tudy of the contraot. Attorney Cuyler stated he also needs authorization for the Chairman to execute the sched~le that is attached to the lease upon a memorandum from the Probation Department that the equipment has arrived end it i; described in the schedule and is in good working order. commi..ioner Voss ..ended hi. aotion to include the reaarka of Mr. cuyler. Commissioner Hasse asked when the equipment has to be paid for? Mr. Drobinski said when the system is received and as people are put on the program. Commissioner Hasse asked who pays et that time? Mr. Drobinski answered that it will be paid for by the defendants, edding that the system is being loaned to the Probation Department for a period not to exceed one year in the hopes that eventually it can be purchased should it be proven effective in the County. Commissioner Hasse asked if matters have to go through the Commission and not through the Judges or the Sheriff's Department? Mr. Drobinski stated that it can go through the Judges, but the County Commission should be apprised of the situation and how it affects the County. Commi..ioner Goodnight ..ended her .econd and oal1ed for the que.tion. 0;: '.:¡:Jf) \..'::.;. '1t::-. ~ . .' '! r I". .\'~.' j , ' ~.I'" t. I'" ~ j . ¡ ;, ~; , ' , " , page 43 aOOK 095p~r.t188 ,.·"""'...,.""_,_·.____,.__>·.d.~;,·.·"'· . , ~,i Jt:' f ," ,) r ;¥. ~ I; t,,:· ~\f' : " ,""" -.,' :'1; )¡~ ¿t"; >(' '.~" ~' I·", :~, y .. 095nq18.9 n;);) , , , June 1', 198. Upon call for the qu.stion the vote va. 4/0 (Commissioner Holland abs.nt) for approval. 4' '""'# ~ ~,:, ,:, r.r ;¡;'of ì.~'1 ";":" ID~: ;.' 15: t~~f. (; l{~ &6 t'" ¿¡It If .~: ,1 {.t'" I,": ! P..-J.' '.)..1 J','.I .IC. ,f J f';": L': Wi .' .'~'.' - , . j' f,~ !;;'J,_' VP í f r_I¡!f!·l:.ri~ c;:, . ~. ¡ '; ,.... r .~';j: r·_.1 r' ., -.J ;' í "i ¡ ~. \ ~. j:- ,Page 44 - - - 4, ',..: 100r: 095 PACt 199 June 16, 1986 Item 120 ~Y PLAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 19.6-1'.7 - APPROVED County Manager Lusk stated that once a year he presents to the Commission, required under the Personnel Rules and Regulations, recom- mended changes on salaries based on annual salary surveys conducted by the Personnel Department. This, he added, does not deal with actual salaries but with salary ranges which are used to hire employees. He stated ttat in the recommendations before the Board today, some salaries are being brought up above the level of the salaries pre- sently paid. .., commissioner Goodnight moved, seconded Þy commissioner Voss and carried 4/0 (Ccmmissioner Holland absent), that the Board accept ths recommendations ot tbe Personnel Department for adjustments to ths 19.6-19.7 Pay Plan. Item 121 PAY INCREASB FOR UTILITIBS DIRECTOR - APPROVED County Manager Lusk stated that a salary increase of 10% for the Utilities Director is being requested. He added that the effective date would be October I, 1986, and this would be in lieu of the 4% increase that is now budgeted for cost-of-living raises. He added that the reason he is recommending this to the Board, is because two years ago the utilities Director earned $56,000 a year, and the pre- sent utilities Director earns $44,000 a year, in the two years that the Utilities Director has been on board, the utilities Department has '.' " ~. ,J .¡ ,.:.:;" Page 45 ~ ,-', j \~-~~\:; - .. .. June 16, 1986 almost doubled in size of cu.tomers, has increa.ed in employees about 25' because of the growth of ~he Department, and he believes that this position .hould be kept in line with comparable po.ition. in other areas. He indicated that Mr. Crandall has proven in the last two years that he can handle the job. Commis.ione~ vo.. moved, .eoonded by commis.ioner aoodnight and c.rri.d 4/0 (Commission.r Holl.nd ab.ent), to approve. 6% ..lary incr.... for the utiliti.. Dir.ctor eff.ctive today .nd . furth.r incr.... of 4% eff.ctive October, It.6. Item 122 RESOLUTION .6-109 RBQUBSTING OPINION FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL REGARDING APPORTIONJŒN'l' BY '1'H1!I BOARD OJ' COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OJ' COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA OJ' LITIGATION SETTLEX!h~ COSTS RE EAST NAPLES UTILITIES - APPROVED County Manager Lusk stated that there were discussions that the General Fund should pay for .ome of the cost. of this settlement, adding that he, Attorney Ander.on, and Clerk Gile. decided to esk for en Attorney General'. opinion ba.ed on the legality of this being done and it is very important before the Commission makes any decision that the opinion be obtained. commi.sion.r VO.. mov.d, ..oond.d by commission.r Ha... and carri.d 4/0 (Commi..ioner Holl.nd ab..nt) that R..olution '6-109 reque.ting an opinion fro. the Attorney aeneral regarding apportion- .ent by tbe Bo.rd of County Commi..ioner. of litiq.tion .ettle.ent co.t. re la.t Naple. utilitie., be adopted. ". "1 " Page 46 lOOK 095 p~r·t 200 í~~~ [;~~;.~ .:.:1 ¡"I t;t 095n9.:201 i ¡ " I i : (;t';:) .,~ r, ..'~, ,;;,/ ...~ r: " '1 ;. ~ .': (, ~:,~ (} ., J<,. June 16, 1986 Mr. Lusk stated that once the opinion is obtainèd, then he ðnd Mr. Giles will tðke another look at the percentages and come back with a recommendation to the Commission. ;. ,',' ~. .-, .' " .. ;',r IP~,.:.- .-.:c., ;-t},. . ~." =- " ¡ ..... ' : .,~ r .:, f~~ 'I'i' ,,' ,r :' r ' "':"';1' . I ~- '.;- , iI!·-;q . .. ¡.' .. (;' r,'.'·· \' L J;; ': ";'" ~ ,/, I·- '~ . r 1<1 "¡I ,. , , ~:~ ': . {, ·1 ,....: " . 1 ~¥. I I ; '! ., ,,~ r'.p_:.," J3Bt'r : (. -: r. r> :~ '\f' ~ t, . " t!?.r·r.}· I~ 'J . ¡ '~fI:q \¡¡:J,·'':.H.f~':~· 1 ~','¡ n-:.ti'::: \. .<~:;l;'b'<Ì ~.;.. c>_ """¡~, è;;; 'JI.'J Page 47 - - - ......, ....__.._,~"."'.",-_..." · "-". I ,~:' .' '(..'_"':~'.'1!'/.I.' .' ,;;. ~;:: F~, . !" Ite. 123 I'OOTI1f1I BILL8 - )'PPROVED I'OR nYHDf'l' Pursuant to Resolution 81-150 the following checks were issued June 16, 1986 through Friday, June 13, 1986, in payment of routine bills: CHECK DESCRIPTION CHECK NOS. 144408-144709 030480-031090 AMOUNT $2,576,775.53 $ 271,057.63 Vendors BCC Payroll It.. f2 4 BUDGET AKENDMENTS .1-302, .1-304/314 - ADOPTED Commissioner Goodniqht moved, seconded by Commissioner Voss and carried 4/0 (commissioner Bolland absent), that Budqet Amendments .1-302, and .6-304 tbrouqb .'-314 be adopted. Itell f2 5 BrrBNSIOlf 01' 'J.'BR.M 01' OJ'J'ICB 01' PUSBNT HBHBERS 01' CONTRACTORS' LICBN8IlfG BOARD POR A PULL TWO YEAR TBR.M EXPIRING JCNB 30, 1987 - )."ROVED Administrative Assistant to the Board Israelson said that last year in June when the present members were appointed to the Contractors' Licensing Board; the Commission had not yet àdopted Ordinance 85-42, which provides for two year terms for all the mem- , . bers, and to bring this Advisory Board into compliance with the .. ,,'~, I '; " . Ordinance, the present members' terms would be extended the full two 1,:"; ,': ;.\ Î : ,. ,; ; ~ " years and expire June 30, 1987. !':ù~1Ult~:"t~ ,:',¡j4.ì. . .' \, WOl~fH¡\ ~'..y':(:~ ..t,;:.:" ;::;.:t ¡ 'it:' ;'. ~;'1:1"f1 1:;~'I'i She stated that the present.members of the Contractors' Licensing Board were and all expressed interest in serving the remainder of two- ',i" ¡ ,~ ,. . ~.. I, ~.,,);-:, ¡.;'';: :. .' Page 48 ;: ',' \ BOOX 095,s·'·!204 ,! .'. ,~,~"--,,,^,,,",,,,,,,",",,,..,,,,.,,,~..."._.,,,.........,.,,",...,.,."..,.."";,,.., -""....,-_._~- ;,: . t" ,'t, I l ~t L:' June 16, 1986 year termD. She added that the terms expire ell at one time rather than staggered. She suggested that the staff work with the Contractors' Licensing Board members to adopt a schedule of term expirations so that all would not expire in the same year. commis.ioner Goodnight .oved, .econded by Commis.ioner Hasse and carried 4/0 (co"mi..ioner Holland ab.ent) to accept statt reoommendations. ~ ' . xt...u \} l ~PPROPRIATIOH OP '11,939.00 PROX THB GZNBRAL FUND TO COVER COSTS POR COUN'l'Y COURT - APPROVED Clerk Giles stated that this item ,has to do with additional , funding to cover the additional workload caused by the Supreme Court's mandeted reporting of statistics regarding pending court cases. He added that there have been increased costs and overtime on cases that have been in process beyond the recommended time, and quarterly reports have to be submitted to the State and it has to continue; this reporting came during the year and could not be budgeted. (Commissioner Holland arrived at the meeting> Commissioner Voss asked if the $12,OOO is for the remainder of this fiscal year? Clerk Giles answered affirmatively, and said next year it is included in the bl:dget for the entire year. Commis.ioner Goodnight moved, seoonded by commissioner Voss and carried unanimously, that $11,939.00 be appropriated trom the aenera1 Fund to oover the costs as outlined by Clerk ai1.s. Page 49 - .. .. ~l _...._~""'".._~"~"'-""'..,,.,,,..,.........~,~,-'-"~~"...""."'''-'..."".,.,,..,._.,""----"- June 16, 1986. ....commi..ion.r Goodniqht .ov.d, seconded by commi~.ioner Vo~. and carried unani.ously, that It.. 14B2 be d.leted and that the followinq item. be approved and/or adopted und.r the consent Aq.ndal····· Ite. 127 PURCHASB IN THB AMOUNT $2,500 FROM FLORIDA DBSIGN AUTOMATION FOR AUTOCAD ADB-3 80F'l'W~JtB FOR THB PLANNING DBPARTMBNT Itell 128 STAFF AUTHORIZBD '1'0 JUlCORD WID THII ct.BRK OJ' COt1RT8 BASBMB1n'S J'OR HIGHWAY LIGHTING FACILITIBS ON PINB RIDGB ROAD 8ee paqes ~ H/.- ~ IS It.. 129 I8SUANCB OJ' JUlQUJ;ST J'OR PROPOSALS (UP) TO RETAIN THII SBRVICBS OJ' A PROJ'BS8IONAL BNGINBBRING CONSULTANT FOR SOLID WASTB DBPARTMENT %t.. f3 0 BID NO. 81-973 AWARDBD TO AXBRSOB SALBS, IRC. OJ' BLLBNTON, J'L. IN THII AMOUNT or '158,883.18 J'OR KlDIAN LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION, SOUTH BARFIBLD DRIVE, PHASB I ne. 131 , . .. .I. ~~' nSD DISPOSAL AGREEMBNT WITH J'LORIDA DBPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION S.e 'aqe. ,:J It, - ¡} / P' . %tea 132 -'.'1 '-,. ' , ~. ~.. . PURCHAS1I AGRBEXENT AND WARRABTY DBED J'OR PROPBRTY LOCATBD ADJACENT TO BXISTING IKMOKALEB COt1RTHOUSB AHNIX See Pages .:J./? -' ;) ~ " ~TU "~: \.'1; :",:i~!,':~- ¥_:.'~ ..'~ :;Ü~/i~:J Üh Ô,,()¡I;~J,.l. ;;1) " ..i. ,,,,.'/ ~". ."', . 2(~; :1':':1' ~ ··';j·'~-;'~r~·~·i:~·~~,·_:tf¡.... .. , .'.:~ ~ " -, . , ., . , . . ' ';¡r":::-. . ... .,.. ... .-..;....----... ......,--,-..--:.----..--.-.-. I.t;~:'r'~ rãr.V.r.cÐ Ys.'-i.H)(õÌl:~Ir:P. 'I!:!.':¡;£' .., ' . ' ~'r.~ 8J.VJ.R Ð~b\'1<'¡'¡(¡;)O" 0" K[(~¡'I'IY,l; QItuu"VXDWO,wa ^iutlCtEIiJ ,I.Qø !.JOn"",,¡ .'.J"';~,/:'. t'i:Vili Yc!ítF.'Hl!:Y.¡' JJr!,"~:r\j ¡OYIW ~~COnJUA CmU(II'HHOUn.:no 'Ioro!fI~1f ';;~', .' ! f "'"c' ~ ~ 1 IDDX 095 p,q 206 (' ¡ ,.~age .'j"::'-, .\:-, Î"\') ¡JU'- " fì .. .",t_ , '. ............,.---- 'fl.:, . ... .;'.., , :...Ib~'. ., ." 1; ..1..... 'If, ~1"" iC"1 0".1.' .:('.\ .. ()~; .")( ,c. June l6, 1986 Item 133 LIASI AGRlIXlNT BETWEIN BOARD 0' COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND 'LORIDA 8TATI DIPARTXlNT 0' HIGHWAY 8A'ETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES 'OR PROPERTY LOCATED AT IMMOULEE AIRPORT See Pages .a 8..3 - ~ ~~ S It.. 134 LIASB AGRlEMBNT CZTWEEN BOARD 0' COUNTY COMMISSIOKBRS AND THB IMMOULBI DAY CARl, INC. c¡l (;~! See Page .;1.3' .,. ¡,'" '." >. It.. US ~. '. ..... t~, J.'o r I J'" J; (,1 , . AIŒlfI)MBNT TO AGREEMENT WITH DAVID LAWRBNCB XlNTAL HBALTH CBNTER, INC. ~ 37-- ~3R See page, Ite. 131 CHANGI ORDBR '1 TO HARPER BROS. IN THB AMOUNT 0' $7,435.00 'OR INCRlASB 0' CLBAX 'ILL 'OR IMMOULZB COMMUNITY PARK, PHASI I, PART 2 See Pages ~ 37-~i{.ð It.. 137 RlVISED TWO-YEAR PLAK 'OR THB JOB TRAIRING PARTNERSHIP ACT (JTPA) _ JOB SERVICI ANKUAL PLAK FOR 81RVICB DILIVERY AREA 20 See Page :J. J./ I Ite. 138 CONTRACT WITH tJPJOHN HlALTHCARI SERVICES, INC. AND JoŒDICAL PERSONNEL POOL T~ PROVIDB SERVICES FOR THI COLLIZR COUNTY SERVICBS 'OR SENIORS PROGRAM UNDER THE COMMUNITY CARl FOR THI ELDERLY ACT (BID '824) See Pages .d 4. ~ - .J ";'7 ¡ ',. '~!' I . }" ;¡ ;.I'nb· "'1 .(.:·,';\·J:Vt!'J~ l.nr' ¡. . , , .' ... ~ ..¡'t; \ .L;;',ttl.~....,~ I 1 :.>-.1 ]' tmJa JH) ",f·'·:· ;~oJ1c~I^\ ..µr't _Ii- .. ""'J~)br\)~ ¡..-; ';n1n¡".H~ ....L . I ,:.:::..,t'r,q\.' ;^'"''-·'',.1:;QÎ ~Ilage Sl " - - .. 1 .__-~".- .~""""--,--->."'"..,~"~.,,"""".".,"~"." 'P-.: ~ " ~ ' '...,,~ ~..x;.... . ~'.J'~,I:- '" ~,d;'¡ "~"4'~-r~,v' ~,,~.;;: ~~C June 16, 1986 It.. 139 CONTRACT RENEWAL WITH DORIS I. ROZYCKI, HBALTH PROFBSSIONAL, '1'0 PROVIDE SERVICBS UNDBR THI COMMUNITY CARl FOR THE ELDERLY PROGRAM See Pages ~ ,¡.~- "".s () Ita. 140 PURCKASII 01' COPY ""CHINE FOR SOCIAL IERVIClS DEPAR'l'M!:NT ($1,93 II) Ite. . U CONTRAer WITH AREA AGENCY OK AGING FOR USII 01' FLORIDA STATE GENERAL UVENUB I'UNDS AND CIRTAIlC LOCAL FUNDS TO CONTINUI COMMUNITY CARl FOR THE BLDERLY PROGRAM See Pages 'óZS I - ~ (.;1. Ita..n APPROVAL 01' MR. Jon BEGBXAJf AS RORTICULTUlUI IXTBNSION AGBNT FOR COLLIER COUN'l'Y Ita.'oU ACCBPTANCE 01' BBRKSHIU LAKlS-SAN'l'A BARBARA BOULEVARD WATER FACILITIBS See O.R. Book 1201, Pages 000676-000681 Item '44 ADDI,TIONAL J'UNDS 01' $7,477.75 '1'0 PRC ENGINEBRING/HOLB, MONTES' ASSOC. FOR BHGInERING WOU ULATED !l:'0 'nm IB1fBR AREA "A" - SPRAY IRRXGATION EFFLUBNT 'l'RANSMISSIOlC ""IN . It.. '45 BID '8'-9311 RBAWARDBD '1'0 SAM GALLOWAY FORD IN 'nm AMOUN'l' OF $8,700 FOR COMPACT VAN FOR THB UTILITIES DIVISION It.. 'oU BID '8'-11" FOR SEWAGE PUMPS AND CONTROL PANELS AWARDBD '1'0 PUMPIT, INC., IN THE AMOUN'l' OF $70,000.00 r-'::. .:-', ~ . , _I' ~. ¡ .-: """q,;' . lOOK 095 PAf,£ 208 Page 52 ,···,-,.·;·.."·_..._.""_~·........"t__~...·;,·,....;..,,,.._....·,,,>··,"","µ-,' _.J,.' -..,~""..,-,+",------"'- I:... D95.v,109 - 1iJJ.; ::, M-. t~;" ð.~'1 ~!," 'I';¡'';'' . t~.. ; ,..: , .~,., v (p¡)'~ jtJ¡: , :~p;~ ~ :;. J; June 16, 1986 Item 147 BID 1817 WITH MITCO WATER LABORATORIES EXTENDED ONE YEAR FOR TREATMENT OF AIR CONDITIONINS CHILLERS. COOLERS AND BOILERS ~~3 See Pages " J'" ~xt.. ua,,,(' , .,.: '¡i ...., , ;;(1 '¡-:~li;; . ,t·, : ,,:,' ,:t,1 :.;:': ;'~.<)~¡,; (/)~1.~,~~f.H· h)'}'H~'; ',. CERTIFICATZS FO~ CORRECTION TO THI TAX ROLL f! 1985 TAX ROLL ,1, ! No. 1985-188/l89 Dated June 4, 1986 ., '.;' Ite. UI ,"; .. , ' ; HISClLtANZOUS CORRBSPONDEKCI - rILZD AND/OR REFERRED ':::-': There being no objection, the Chair directed that the following , miscellaneous correspondence be filed and/or referred to the various departments as indicated below I '.'r!.,~ I; ;. .' L " l' Letter dated June 2, 1986', fr'om David Emerson Bruner, Attorney for Bob Kuhn, ¡regarding Immokalee Airport Flight School Lease. Filed. Letter dated 5/22/86 to Mr. William L. Montrone,. Vice President, PaineWebber, Inc., from James C. Giles, Fiscal Officer, regarding Disclosure of Underwriters of $88,000,000 Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, and attaching Bond Counsel Tom Giblin's opinion as to appropriate disclosure of underwriters required. Referred to BCC and filed. Executive Summary dated S/21/86 for the recording and collection of water and sewer special assessments.' Referred to BCC and filed. 2. 3. Letter dated 5/29/86 from William J. enclosing copy of Report No. A-86-S, the Medical Examiner and the County. and filed. 5. DER Calendar of Events dated 6/2/86, Florida Rivers Month - June 1986. Referred to BCC and filed. 4. Reagan, Clerk, a contract between Referred to BCC ',,: ~ ~,¡' I -,_ t ;, ,\ ';\:'"I~' ,r:,>·/~,~ , : It" J./.' C· ',J; ! _')'.x £. \ },;' ¡ r ~,.',: ~ ; 'J . .".Page 53 - .. .. .-..-_."-...-...."",_"'".;o.¡;"""........,,,_"".,'"',,_."'_.....-.._...'. ,I' __._·AA.~__...'''''''''''__....·,_·_ ,:- ,: ,) ... Memorandum dated 5/22/86 to Ken Pineau, Fleet Management Director, from Ronald F. Cook, C.P.A., regarding Fleet Management/Motor Pool Financial Statements for the period ended April 30, ).986. Referred to BCC, Lori Zalka and "~.,J>".t£;.¡,,..,.¡~. filed. '!.,'1! "J;' ,;·(;t:,!·<jI~~ ',"1,. ''.:;¡:';:;¡;'.'~ ," . ~':< r'~:: ,) ó.·" '~it 6. June l6, 1986 Memorandum dated 6/3/86 from B. J. White, Assistant Chief, DNR, regarding meeting of State Recreation and Parks Land Acquisition, and enclosing copies of the agenda. Referred to Pam Brangaccio, Tim Vanatta, Kevin O'Donnell and filed. Memorandum dated 6/1/86 from Elayne S. Huebner, Chief, DNR, enclosing government decals for the vessels currently registered, owned, and operated by our agency for purposes other than recreation. Referred to Joe Warren with decals and filed. Received 6/9/86 from Robert G. Dean, Director, Division of Beaches and Shores, DNR, an administratively approved pel'mit No. A CO-I3l ATF, Permittee I Van Dev., Inc. Re1~rred to Pam Brangaccio, Vickie Mullins, Dr. Proffitt and filed. Received 6/9/86 copy of the Dun & Bradstreet Business Information Report on County business, to assure accu- racy, make any corrections and return. Original referred to Jim Giles, xc filed. Letter dated 6/4/86 from David Martin, Utility Manager, enclosing Notice of Intention of Eagle Creek Utility Company to apply for a sewer certificate from the State of Florida. Referred to Bruce Anderson, Neil Dorrill, Tom Crandall and filed. 7. 8. 9. 10. II. Memorandum dated 5/22/86 from Mary W. Morgan, Supervisor of Elections, regarding Polling Site Change for Precinct 112 from High Point Country Club to Naples High School Auditorium. Referred to BCC and filed. 12. Memorandum dated 5/22/86 to Doug Greenfield, EMS Director, from Ronald F. Cook, C.P.A., regarding EMS preliminary Financial Statements of the period ended April 30, 1986. Referred to BCC, Lori Zalka and filed. 13. ;,", : J'" 100': 095 n'o! 210 Page 54 __.~_,,,,_.._.-..~~~.. v'l P"t r "",.,.....""_"..'.......'''.0"''..'",,,--''''-..."-....,.,·..,,.,,·,·.,·-.'' '..,.. --, .; .__._-----~"'- 095 w.t 211 June 16, 1986 14. ',,), p; \ '! ", It) Memorandum dated 5/22)96 to Robert Fahey, Solid Wasts Director, from Ronald F. 'Cook, C.P.A., regarding Solid Waste Disposal Financial Statements for the period ended April 30, 1986. Referred to BCC, Lori Zalka and filed. Memorandum dated 5/20/86 to Thomas Crandall, Utilities Director, from Ron Cook, Proprietary Accountant, regarding Marco Water and Sewer District Financial Sl~tements for the period ended March 31, 1986. Referred to 3CC and Lori Zalka. IS. 16. Memorandum dated 5/20/86 to Thomas Crandall, Utilities Director, from Ron Cook, Proprietary Accountant, regarding Goodland Water District Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 1986. Referred to BCC and Lori Zalka. ~ I I Memorandum dated 5/20/86 to Thomas Crandall, Utilities Director, from Ron Cook, Proprietary Accountant, regarding County Water-Sewer District Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 1986. Referred to BCC and Lori Zalka. 17. 18. Memorandum dated 5/16/86 to Thomas T. Crandall, Utilities Administrator, from James C. Giles, C.P.A., regarding Calculation of Cost to Purchase East Naples Water Systems, Inc. Referred to BCC and Lori Zalka. Letter dated 6/10/86 from Susan R. Gillis, Legal Assist., requesting information as to all liens or assessments regarding property at 4535 Tamiami Trail North, Naples, FL, Unit 258, Park Shore Resort, owner Esther Sturman. Referred to Jim Giles. Letter dated 5/28/86 from Frederick Allen Garcia regarding Claimant, Research Reports, Inc., for claims against the County for acts of omissions occurring on May 16, 1986. Referred to Sheriff Rogers, Ken Cuyler, and Sherry Rynders. Letter dated 6/5/86 from Uoris M. Runge, advising that Hyde & Assoc. Consultants, Inc. are representing Clientl Identity, Inc., Driver; Ted Lane, D/Accident: 5/27/66, as a result of an accident, with Our Driver: Homero B. Partida. Referred to Sherry Rynders. 19. 20. 21. i ' ,"¡ . Page 55 - - ~'_""""',' ,,,...·,,,",,....,_,~''''',C"_''';....''''_·,,.....,;',··''' .'". '^·~..o""...".-..,.'"·..",,",y,."~"r· ,"'" 1 " June 16, 1986' 22. Letter dated 6/2/86 from High F. Ferguson, Jr., Correctional Records Supervisor I, advising that Jerry D. Bezzard, DC'78376l, Case '85-770 CFATB, will be relea8ed from Mayo Correctional Institution of 6/27/86 and is being instructed to report to our office for instructions concerning community service. Referred to Sheriff Rogers. 23. Minutesl A. CCPC - 5/1/86 and Agenda for 6/5/86 B. EMSAC 5/14/86 and Agenda for 6/11/86 C. city of Naples 5/7/86 D. Citizens Advisory Task Force 5/1/86 24. Letter dated 6/4/86 to Lori Zalka, Budget Director, from Jame8 P. Ward, Assist. District Manager, enclosing Resolution for Pelican Bay Lighting Municipal Service Taxing District's operating budget for Fiscal Year 1987. xc to Lori Zalka and filed. " ,'- 25. Copy of letter dated 5/22/86 to Dept. of Revenue from Sam ,'J. Colding, Property Appraiser, ettaching proposed budget for period of October 1, 1986 through September 30, 1987. , ~f.er red to .BCC, a,ndLori Zelka. 26. Received June 5, 1986 Supplemental Response by Sarasota County, Florida, Case No. 85-572, et al, regarding Jerome Hàggins, et al, Appellants, vs. State of Florida, Àppellee, attached is copy of Motions to Withdraw Filed 'by the Public Defender of the Tenth Judicial Circuit in 247 Pending Appeals. Re~erred to David weigel and File. 27. Letter dated 6/3/86 from Robert L. Patton, Controller, advising of distribution of Current Ad Valorem Tax to the BCC, and attaching distribution recep. Referred to BCC and Lori Zelka. 28. S/IS/86 Notice of Public Workshop to discuss Tamiami Trail Improvements to be held Thursday, June 5 from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. end 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. ln the BCC Meeting Room. Referred to BCC and George Archibald. 29. Letter dated 5/14/86 to All Chairmen of County Commissions, from Thomas E. Drawdy, Secretary of Transportation, attaching Tentative Five Year Transportation Plan and Annual Program Budget for July 1, 1986 through June 30, 1991. Referred to BCC and filed. 30. Letter dated 6/9/86 to all grantees, from Peter N. : Stowell, Acting Regional Administrator, regarding Funds utilization and Progress Reports. Referred to Jeff Perry. ... " Page 56 ! '" .~ ' 0. ¡ t ~ ~ ., ; aOOK 095 N',f 2.12 ...---""..'.' ."_",""__",,,,''''''''''~'1i<II,..,,_¡_'''',",,"'''*'"'''''"''''''''""..",.._.....'__M''"'·.""'"·...__"''·,·,'''''· " ...-"'.-.-.......---.".....-- " !'l;)~" '\ ¡,": 'I, ... v: .." 095 PJt,t 213" June 16, 1986 31. Received 6/6/86 Preliminary Notice to Owner, from Terry la Fontaine, Credit Supervisor, advising that his company is a participating supplier, under an order given by Community Electric of Collier, Inc., for miscellaneous electrical materials, and enclosing an information form. Referred to Neil Dorrill and Skip Camp. There being no further business for the good of the county, the ',to meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 2:37 P.M. , j BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/ BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX-OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL J~:' ~". ~:',' ~, ¿¡Ie ~'" ,J., J~", j ...'~, "f· rY\~' .. . . - . "" 'li", ···\ùu.nò··'·, J, ~.~ 'Il,. , " ......"' - . '. ., l...·...'~..'-..;r~: ~Ì~~.CLERK i~ ,:: ,Ì!~:.;- ~;,;~.. . . ..,~~ ,:~, ~ ..a:2. c ',,' it! . ., . i,- .J - . i . """ "Th~~~ ~~?~~e~'::pprOVed by the ~cc on ~,z.~~ t' 7 r~ ð~ prese~ted ~ as corrected I . ',' ~ t, i ~.~ ( . , :<, 1 :~ : r,,.; .f V·Oj,' " ¡, . ), ~_', l ~dJt J I;,; ... (d , ¡. .," c., I J ¡ "j ~ .. . ., ;)-(;~.. : 4 ,., ,):'" ~rj. ... f !: JP;: :". (HJ ;,;'''',(1 t 'J ¡ , t : i; . ;~. t ;,}.. ¡}. ." '.' ! ".. '¡, 1," '1 l ~ ~ , 1,1 Page 57 - - ..