The URL can be used to link to this page

BCC Minutes 08/19/1986 R .. .. . ....... .. Naples, Plorida, August 19, 1986 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board o~ Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted bU8iness herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "P" of the Courthouse Complex, East Naples, Plorida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: 30hn A. Pistor VICE-CHAIRMAN: Anne Goodnight Prederick 3. Voss Max A. Hasse C. C. "Red" Holland ALSO PRESENT: 3ames C~ Giles, Clerk: Maureen Kenyon and Carmen Ruiz (2:00 P.M.), Deputy Clerks; Donald B. Lusk, County Manager; Neil Dorrill, Assistant County Manager; Pam Brangaccio, Deputy Assistant County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Tom Olliff, Administrative ~ssistant to the County Manager; Ann McKim, David Weeks, and Barbara Cacchione: Planners; Tom Crandall, Utilities Administrator; Dave Pettrow, Zoning/Planning Director; 3ane Pitzpatrick, Budget Analyst; Nina Small, Acting Community Development Administrator; Leo Oche, Personnel Director; Sue Pilson, Secretary to the Board¡and Deputy Curtis Mills, Sheriff's Department. , "", , , ~ I lOOK 096 PAr,t 248 Page 1 t . , .~ ~ ; UlL. ·,Jd 1. '\ .' ;' ~ 4: } ~ ¡ { f 1 , .. } ~ I , 096PAGt257 r: l'-'~1J:L: ~,I " , August 19, 1986 AGIKDA - APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CHANGES: Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that the agenda be approved with~th. fOllowing changes: Item 9E4 Added - recommendation to allow Naples Floor Covering to use alternative carpet tiles for BUilding "D". Item 12D to be heard at 11:15 A.M. Item 12E to be heard at 10:15 A.M. Item lOB re resolution for issuance of Solid Waste Revenue Bond for acquisition of landfill cell liner - continued one week. Item 10C r~ discussion of AT&T contract ~ continued one week. Item 6B3 re Petition ZO-86-13C - Withdrawn. Item 6Cl re SNR-86-eC, continued to 8/26/86. EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS PRESENTED Commissioner Pistor presented employee service awards to the following,employees: Phyllis,Dupree - Library Kenneth Cuyler - County Attorney E~aine Meyers - Library Item #3 10 years 5 years & years 1 Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition ZO-86-11C, Community Development Division requesting an amendment to Ordinance '1'ap. #1 It.. #1 a. b. c. d. e. f. g. Ite. #2 i, . Vi'. ¡. i ~\ Page 2 .. .. .. ,;(:,', ' PETITION ZO-88-11C, COMMUNITY DIVBLOPMlNT DIVISION - CONTrD TO '9/9/86 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on 3uly 18, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the ----....-....-,. _...-_..",~."..."""-,.".,,, ...~ l~~ '~~:~, ".~li.f,. t.,," ,; ·t', ;.'!, ~ 1 .,', i.~'· tä¡~f~"~ "':'~" ' , 1 "i' ,,;mL, : -M ; , J, ." "L.:~ dkè _""".u"'"'..",·,,'"..,,_,'.,·'''''''''n....;<·,.,..~'''.,·,.,,.~'''··..""......',.,."... ...._"-,___~"'"_,.:.....~_._ - - - /' August 19, 19a6 82-2, The Comprehensive Zoning Regulations for the unincorpora~ed area of Collier County by amending Section 8.33, Fences, Subsections a.ð) and b.6) to clarify that fences shall be permitted principal uses in all residential and non-residential districts. Planner McKim stated that this is basically a housekeeping item, noting that Ordinance 84-e, which amended the Zoning Ordinance, allows fences as permitted uses in both residential and non-residential districts and they may be constructed with or without the presence of a priaary structure in any zoning district. She indicated that wh~n the ordinance was amended it omitted the word "principal". She noted that the ordinance should r.ad that fences shall be permitted prin- cipal uses in all residential and non-residential districts. She noted that the CCPC held their pUblic hearing and unanimously recom- mended forwarding this petition to the Board of County Commissioners for approval. Mr. 30e Grimm stated that he has a concern regarding this matter, noting that according to the Zoning Ordinance, it tences are allowed to be principal uses in any zoning district, an individual can construct an accessory use without building a main structure. He stated that people could build a garage in a residential area without building the house f~rst by simply putting up a fence. Planner McKim stated that this is not the intent, but according to the way it reads it would be allowed. She stated that she would like to have this matter continued in order to clarity the language and the intent. BOCK 096 PAr,r 258 Page 3 lOOK 096 PAr,r 259 August 19, 1986 Mr. Grimm stated that he does not understand why a fence would be allowed on a piece of property it there is nothing to be protected on ,that property., County Manager Lusk stated that one reason that people want fences around their property is to protect people from dumpihg. Co..is.ion.r Vo.. aov.d, seconded by Commissioner Has.e and carried unanimously, that Petition ZO-86-11C, be continued to Septe.bar 9, 1986. It.m #" ORDIKAKCB 88-&ð RI Petition ZO-86-12C, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISIOK, REQUESTINCJ AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCB 82-2, TO CLARIJ'Y VEHICLE RENTALS FOR ALL VEHICLES EXCEPT AUTOMOBILES AS A PROVISIONAL USE - ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on 3uly 18, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition ZO-86-12C, filed by Community Development Division, requesting ån amendment to Ordinance 82-2, the Comprehensive Zoning Regulations for the unincor- porated area of Collier County by amending Section 7.23, Commercial General, Subsection 7.23.b.3)(h), to clarify vehicle rentals for all vehicles except automobiles as a provisional use. Planner McKim .tated that this is to clarify the provisional use for vehicle rentals to include all vehicles except automobiles. She stated that the Zoning Ordinance allows "vehicle rentals - automobiles only" as a permitted principal use in the C-4 zoning district. She reported that vehicle rentals are a permitted provisional use in the Page " .'¡ - - .. " ." ,. '.,.. . . ~."T .. .. .. Augu.t 19, 1985 0-4 diatrict and to avoid any contu.ion, this provisional u.. .hould be claritied to eliminate automobiles, because they are allowed as a principal us. in this district. She stated that it should be amended to r.ad vehicle rentals - all vehicles except automobiles. She stated that the CCPC held their public hearing and unanimously recommended approval. Commi.sioner Voss aoved, .econded by Commi..ion.r Has.. and carri.d unanimou.ly, that the public hearing be closed. 'Commissioner Voss mov.d, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carri.d unanimously, that the Ordinance as numbered and entitled below b. adopt.d and entered into Ordinance Book No. 24: ORDINANCE 86-&& All ORDINANCB AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS POR TRI ttRINCORPORATED AREA OP COLLIER COUNTY BY AMENDING SECTION 7.23 COMMERCIAL GENERAL, SUBSECTION 7.23.b.3)(h) TO CLARIFY VEHICLE RENTALS POR ALL VEHICLES EXCEPT AUTOMOBILES AS A PROVISIONAL USE AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Ite. #& ORDINANCE 8S-&8 RE PETITION ZO-86-14C, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION, REQUESTING AMlKDMENT TO ORDINANCE 82-2 RB PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES BY ADDING EQUIPMENT RENTALS - ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on 3uly 18, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit ot Publication tiled with the Clerk, pUblic hearing was opened to consider Petition ZO~86-14C, filed by Community Development Division requesting an amendment to Ordinance 82-2, The Comprehensive Zoning Regulations tor the unincorporated area '. .~ L~ ¡ I; r ¡~ t. ;... "¡".t" . . 1 ~ ' , , '~I (' lOOK l1~f)PAGr~ Page IS , 096nfl.261 , \! , : " . , August U, 1986 of Collier County by amending Section 7.25, Industrial Light District, Subsection 7.25.B.l), permitted principal uses and structure. by 'J:, . adding equipment rentals. f:.;' " Planner McKim stated that this will amend the zonlng Ordinance to add "equipment rentals, including lawn mowers and power .awsn to the "IL" district. She state~ that equipment rentals are a compatible use in the "IL" district and there seems to be no apparent reason for its omi.sion from this district and, therefore, Staff recommends approval. She stated that the CCPC held their public hearing and unanimously . ~'~ recommended forwarding this to the Board of County Commissioners for approva I. Commi..ioner Voss moved, seconded by COmmissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commipsioner Ba..e and carri.d unaniaou.ly, that the Ordinanc. as numbered and entitled below be adopted and entered into Ordinance Book Ro. 2.: ORDINANCE 86-56 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE'82-2, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY BY ADDING EQUIPMENT RENTALS TO SECTION 7.25, INDUSTRIAL LIGHT DISTRICT, SUBSECTION 7.25.b.l), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES ¡ AND BY PROVIDING AN EJ'PECTIVE DATE. Item #5 ORDINANCE 86-57 DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AS THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY - ADOPTED WITH SECTION "G" CHARGED Legal n~tice having been published in the Naples Daily News on 3uly 18, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed "ith the .! ; Page 5 .. .. .. __......,,<,-""_..".. '"'~'''''·''';;''''''·.'''''''C'''·''''' ,'=.'''''",,",,,,,",,,..~,,,,.__ ~ -_-."",~,....,....,.....~, , <",,¡Olj;' :"""'-': ' '. ;~; ,ì ..... .~~:'.j, '..~ ..\: -Sf': , "'if'l, ,~i i~"<'.f¿: -.'7. ' i':'"} August 19, 1986 Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider an Ordinance designating and establishing the Collier County Planning Commission as the Local Planning Agency pursuant to the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 198ð. Planner Cacchione stated that the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985, Section 163.3174, P.S. requires that the governing body of each local govern- ment designate and, by ordinance, establish a local planning agency. She stated that the LPA shall have the general responsibilIty for the conduct of the Comprehensive Planning Program and their duties and responsibilities are outlined in the proposed ordinance. She indi- cated that the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act of 1975 has the same requirement for establishing a LPA and at that time, the Collier County Planning Agency was established and designated as the local planning agency. She reported that when the Collier County Planning Agency, the Coastal Area Planning Commission and the Immokalee Area Planning Commission were merged to form the Collier County Planning Commission it became necessary to re-create a LPA pur- suant to the new act. She stated that the purpose of this proposed Ordinance is to designate and establish the Collier County Planning Commission as the local planning agency. She reiterated that the CCPC held their public hearing and unanimously recommended approval of the ; proposed Ordinance. She noted that since that time, there has been some discussion with some developers regarding language in Section 3 aOOK 096 p.\r,r 262 Page 7 { ~ ~ '; l ~ ,.. " I >. . ~. I} - aoolt . 096"A9.: 263 August 19, 1985 of the proposed ordinance under item "g". She stated that because of their comments and the structure that the County now has, it was felt that the language may not be appropriate and would therefore, like to replace item Kg" with the following language: "The Community Development Division (CDD) is designated by the Boar~of County Commissioners and the Local Planning Agency (LPA) as the agency responsible for preliminary recommendations on comprehensive plan amendments, consistency of land use regulations or development orders with the comprehensive plan. However, final recommendation to ~he Board for the adoption of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, or determination of the consistency of land use regulations or develop- ment orders with such plan shall be the responsibility of the LPA." She stated that this language would simply clarify the item. Co.-issloner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. Commissloner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the Ordinance as numbered and entitled below be adopted and entered into Ordinance Book No. 24 with the new Item -g-: ORDIJfAJICE 815-51 AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AND ESTABLISHING A LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY PURSUANT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT OF 1985 (CHAPTERS 163.3161 _ 163.321&, FLORIDA STATUTES); SETTING FORTH SAID AGENCY'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES; ESTABLISHING SAID AGENCY'S ORGANIZATION, RULES AND PROCEDURES; REQUIRING THAT ALL MEETINGS BE PUBLIC AND PROVIDING FOR THE KEEPING OF PUBLIC RECORDS; PROVIDING POR FINANCIAL SUPPORT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY OF ANY PORTION DECLAREQ INVALID; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES IN CONPLICT HE~TH; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ErrECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Page 8 - - - 'r¡:':' '~. '.1;,¡ .....,..-"!;.,... (~...." , ...-. . .. "1 "./' August 19, 1986 Ite. #7 GDIRAL IlIQUIREMENTS AND PROCBDURES I'OR AMEHDIlfeJ THE COLLIER COOKTY COMPRIHBKSIVI PLAN - CONTIKOBD TO 8/28/88 Planner Cacchione stated that this is a resolution establishing general requirements and procedures for amending the Comprehensive Plan, adding that she was contacted the previous day by Collier Development with questions and wording changes regarding this matter. She stated that there i. a request by Mr. Pickworth to continue this ite. until next week. Deputy Assistant County Manager Brangaccio questioned how this continuance will effect the grant money from the State, to which Planner Cacchione .tated that this resolution has to be sent to the State by September 1, 1988, adding that it could be Federal Expressed at the end of next week's meeting. County Attorney Cuyler stated that he has discussed this matter with all parties concerned and he feels that it can be resolved next week. Commissioner Voss questioned why the requirement of notifying people within 300 feet has been deleted, to which Planner Cacchione stated that the way the current plan is structured there would be expansions of the urþan area, which would mean notifying a good por- tion of the County. She stated that if the urban boundary was expanded by one mile, it would mean 300 teet of the property owners within that one mile would have to be notified and it is costly and time consuming and is not a requirement by State law. BOOK 096 PAGE 264 Page 9 096nt;t265 August 19, 19815 Commissioner Pistor stated that there could be a policy that a quarter page ad be put into the newspaper. Planner Cacchione stated that it is a requirement that these changes be advertised and that they be a quarter page ad with a map, with the heading being 18 points and not advertised in the legal section. ~ Commissioner Holland stated that he would agree that these people .hould be notified when there are major changes, Commis.loner Plator directed Staff to check into this matter and bring more intora&tion back on what will be involved. He noted that this item will be con- tinued until next week. Ite. #8 RESOLUTION 86-139 ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES TO PROVIDE FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE COMPRBBBRSIVE PLANNING PROCESS - ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily Hews on August 3, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication tiled with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider a resolution establishing procedures to þrovide for public participation in the Comprehensive Planning Process. Planner Cacçhione stated that this resolution is a requireMent of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act and Minimum Criteria Rule, which means that the local governing body and the Local Planning Agency adopt procedures to provide for and encourage public par- ticipation in the planning process. She stated that this resolution ia intended to meet the requirements of the legislation. She noted ." ':...'. l f' ~, I :~ .. I :~t"o. . Page 10 - - - - - - August 19, 1986 that the County has received grant money of which this ie a work pro- duct and will be .ubmitted for the next cycle of funding, adding that the CCPC held their public hearing and recommended approval of thIs re.olution. Tape #2 Co..le.loner Vo.. moved, .econded by Commis.ioner H..se and carried unanimou.ly, that the public hearing be closed. Commi..ioner Voss moved, eeconded by Commi.sioner H.... and carried unanimously, that Re.olution 86-139 eetablishing procedures to provide tor public participation in the Comprehensive Planning Process be adopted. :' ';¡ 1 ; \ ~ , , ; ",', f;','; "{,;.' 800K 096 PAGE 266 Page 11 , ' t'~~ . '\ 1 ! ~ i " , ~ ..' .. , , "0".". . (J96,n9.~9 ' ...\ ,\. ' ~ i i 'l . ¡ .::- "/' August 19, 1986 ì ;' " , It.. .. RESOLUTION 8S-140 RE PETITIOK V-8S-l0, THOMAS FONTANA, REQUESTING A 80 FOOT VARIANCE FOR C-3 PROPERTY OK THE NORTH SIDE OF 102HD AVENUE NORTH - ADOPTED AT 48 I AND SUBJECT TO STIPULATIONS Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on August 3, 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publicatton tiled with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-86-10 tiled by Thomas Fontana, requesting a 50 toot variance from the required side yard setback for C-3 property adjacent to residential, of 50 feet to 0 fe~t for property on the north side of 102nd Avenue North, approximately 250 feet west of US-41, in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 2& East, (North Naples). Planner Weeks stated that the objective of this petition is to obtain a 60 foot variance to allow construction of a commercial bUilding. He stated that the subject property is located in Naples Park approximately 2&0 feet west of U.S. 41, and is zoned C-3. He noted that the property to the east is zoned C-3, and to the west i. RMr-6, and that the subject property is vacant. He stated that the petitioner proposes to construct a commercial building on the property and would require parking. He stated that the property to the east that is zoned C-3 contains a single-family residence, which is non- conforming and is approximately 5 feet from the property line. He noted that the property to the west contains a duplex that is approxi- mately 25 feet from the side property line. He stated that the C-3 district requires that when that district i. abutting a residential Page'12 ". f i ¡ -,( '1 " - - - "",,,.,.~,,,".....',.<,;,"_,",,._..".>,,,,,,.,~,,,,,...,..._".__,,__,",...·c...~ - - .... .: August 19, 1986 district, there has to be a 50 foot setback, but this lot is o~ly 50 feet wide and would, therefore, make the property totally useless which 1s why the petitioner is requesting a 50 foot variance. He .tated that Staff realizes that there is a hardship, but he does not feel that the entire lot width is reasonable as there is a landscape buffer requirement when commercial abuts residential. He stated that because of the single-family residence to the east, he feels that it would be appropriate to add an additional 5 feet for aesthetic reasons .. well as safety reasons which would give a total of 10 feet between ths two structures, adding that his recommendation is that the 50 foot variance request be denied and that a 45' variance request be approved with a stipulation that from both property lines a 5 foot distance be left. He stated that the variance is measured from the property line itself and the setback distance is measured from property lines, adding that as the ordinance stands, the structure could be built to the east side property line and he is recommending the stipulation ' that it be built five feet out. Mr. Thomas Fontana stated that the house next to his property is zoned C-3 and if someone should buy that property, they would probably remove the house and put a building right on the property line because on C-3 property you fan build from lot line to lot line. He stated that he would like to put his building 'on the line on one slde and on the other side he is about 29 feet away from the structure. He stated that he feels that there would be plenty of room on both sides of his proposed building to prevent any type of a safety hazard. lOOK 096 PAGt 270 Page 13 , , , "m 096I'AiZ71 August 19, 1986 Mr. Helmut Grimm, owner of the property east of the proposed building, stated that he has no intention of selling or removing hi. house. He stated that whatever the requireMents are in the Zoning Ordinance, he would like them enforced without any al~erations, Mr. Ed Miller, owner of 8-family units two blocks west of this property, stated that when he contracted to buy this property he knew that there was a 50 foot buffer zone between a commercial building and a residential area, He stated that Mr. Pont ana should have checked into this matter before he purchased the property or at least purchåsed it based on the stipulation that he could get a variance. He stated that he objects to giving a variance on this property and it should remain the way it is, t~ keep the buffer zone there. Mr. Fontana stated that he recently purchased this property and knew he would have to get a variance, but also,knew that it was zoned C-3 and he could build a commercial building on it. Planner Weeks stated that a single-family home could not be built on this property as it is zoned C-3 and is only for commercial use. He stated that in order to put a single-family home on the lot, it would have to be rezoned to RMF-6 and he would not recommend approval of that because it would be non-conforming as it is only 50 feet wide. He stated that Staff feels that to grant a variance of some sort would be the best choice in order to allow use of the property with the C-3 zoning. Commissioner Holland questioned the size of the building that is proposed to which Mr. Pont ana stated that it is 30 teet by 50 feet. Page 1. - - - ~~ .. .. .. .-" AUgu8t 19, 1986 - In answer to Commi.sioner Holland, Planner Week. .tated that the front .etback is 15 teet, the rear .etback is 25 teet and 0 or 5 feet on each .ide. Commis.ioner Vo.. moved, .econded by Commi..ioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that the public hearing be closed. County Attorney Cuyler .tated that Staff is indicating that the petitioner would hsve no use of the property without a variance, adding that the Board ot County Commis.ioners needs to take into account that there is a taking issue and the petitioner could complain . that he could make no legal use of this property and a.k the Board of County Commi..ioner. to purchase his property. He .tated that it the variance i. not granted, Staff .hould look at .ome options tor the petitioner. Commissioner Vo.. aoved, seconded by Commissioner S.... and carried unanimou.ly, that Petition V-86-10 for a 50 foot variance be denied, but that Re.olution 86-140 re Petition V-86-10, Thoma. ô, rontana, be adopted with a 45 toot variance tor C-3 property on the north 8lde ot 102nd Avenue with the stipulation that all structure. on the subject property .hall be located at le..t 5 teet from both side property lines. f .L ; aoox 096 FAr;t 272. Page 15 " j ;, !', '. ¡ " aOOK 096 PAGt 275 August 19, 1986 It.. #10 RESOLUTION 86-141 RE PU-86-11C, ROY MARSHALL REPRESENTING CEDAR MONTESSORI SCHOOL, INC. REQOESTING PROVISIONAL USE "B" OF THE C-4 ZONING DISTRICT FOR A CHILD CARE CENTER ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRAIL BLVD. AND SAND PINE ROAD - ADOPTED, SUB3ECT TO FINDING OF FACT AND PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT . Planner Weeks stated that the objective of this petition is to obtain a proVisional use for a child care center. He noted that lands to the north and south are zoned C-4, and land. to the east are zoned RMr-16. He stated that lands to the west, across Trail Blvd. and 08-41 are zoned PUD which is Pelican Bay - Residential tract. He reported that this property is located within the Shopping Center where the old Master's Merchandise Mart was located on the east side of U.S. 41, south of Vanderbilt Beach Road. He stated all lands surrounding the shopping center are undeveloped and within the shopping center to the north of the proposed child care site is B & S Marine Supplies and to the south is Pine Ridge 'Chiropractic and a dra- pery store. He indicated that the child care center may create some noise by simply having children congregated at one location, but the effect on the neighboring businesses would be negligible. He noted that the property to the east i. undeveloped, but contains the zoning tor multi-family units, adding that for this reason, Staff recommends that the outside play area have a landscaped buffer around the entire play area. He stated that all appropriate agencies reviewed this petition and had no objection to its approval subject to the stipula- tions outlined in the Executive Summary dated August 19, 1986. He Page 16 - - - August 19, 1986 noted that the CCPC held their public hearing and there was discussion with regards to the buffer requirement. He stated that after. di.cus.ion based on the Pindings of Fact, the CCPC recommended appro- val of this petition subject to the Staff stipulations with the amend- ment of the buffer requirement to require only the wall or solid fence to eliminate the five foot landscape strip requirement. He stated that it was felt that it would be taking up additional property on such a small area and would lessen the amount of playable area. He stated that at the hearing no one spoke for or against the petition, but a "Letter of No Objection" was received from B & S Marine Supplies, which is the tenant adjacent to the north. He stated that after the hearIng one lette~ was received objecting to this type of use, indicating that this child care is not a commercial type use and should not be allowed in this area. He stated that the recommendation is for approval subject to the Planning Commission's recommendation. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried unanimously, that Resolution 86-141 re Petition PU-86-11C, Roy Marshall representing Cedar Montessori School, requesting provisional use "b" of the C-4 zoning district for a child care center on the northeast corner of TraIl Blvd. and Sanð Pine Road be adopted SUbject to Finding of Fact and the Petitioner's Agreement. '!. BODK (J!Jf)PA~t~f) Page 17 ·-""""·~"··_W lOOK 096 PAr,r 281 Tape #3 It.. #11 August 19, 1986 ~ Planner Weeks stated that the objective of this pétition is to WEEK obtain a provisional Use f~r a psychiatric hospital. He stated that the subject property is located north of Immokalee Road and East of A-2"ST" and are undeveloped, but it is reasonable to assume that in ment. He noted that a:l the neighboring properties are zoned A-2 and natural buffer. He stated that the access is the old railroad ease- north and northeast by the Cocohatchee River Basin which acts as a U.S. 41. He indicated that the proposed pr~ject is bordered on the southern half of the west boundary, noting that the western quarter of indicated that a road is proposed along the east, south, and the the future these properties might be rezoned to some other use. He the property is where the proposed parking facilities and multi- purpose playing field will be located. He stated that Staff feels that properties to the west may be impacted by noise generated by the plaYing field as well as noise and glare generated by vehicles gOing at the time of the application for bUilding permits with the final one of the Staff recommendations is that a final site plan be required landscape buffer along the entire western boundary. He stated that to and from the parking area and would, therefore, recommend a site plan showing the road along the eastern and southern property lines and tne recreation area on the northern part of the property Page 18 .. - .. August 19, 1986 adjacent to the river. He stated that all appropriate agencies reviewed the petition and have no objection to its approval subject to the stipulations found in the Executive Summary dated August 19, 1986. He noted that the CCPC held their public hearing and there was discussion regarding Stipulation "3", which is a requirement that the petitioners donate 25 feet of right-of-way along Immokalee Road. He stated that ~he subject property does not front on Iamokalee Road but the property to the south is also owned by Collier Develop~ent Corporation. He stated that after discussion the CCPC recommended that this petition be approved subject to the stipulations found in the Executive Summary with the deletion of Stipulation "3". He stated that at the CCPC hearing no. one spoke for or against the petition and there has been ~o correspondenc~ received. Mr. Alan Reynolds of Wilson, Miller, Barton, SolI & Peek, Inc., stated that he would like to request a one week continuance of this petition so that they would be able to have a representative of First Hospital Corporation available to answer any specific questions about the facility. He stated that First Hospital Corporaticn is the cor- poration that would be building the 60-bed facility. Commissioner Holland stated that he has some questions and he would be willing to continue this petition for one week. Comaissioner Ho11and moved, seconded by Commissioner Voss and carrIed unanimously, that Petition PU-86-8C be continued for one week. Item #12 TRAKS~ OF 812,035.98 PROM THE GENERAL FUND INTO THE SOLID WASTE - DTERPRISE ACCOUNT FOR EXPUSES INCURRED IN THE COUNTY-WIDE CLEAN UP PROGRAM - APPROVED BOOK 096 PAr.! 282 Page 19 -"'--,,-_.,~- aOOK 096f'm283 August 19, 1986 Public Works Administrator Archibald stated that this is a request to reimbur.. the Solid Waste Enterprise Account for expenditures as a result of the County-wide Clean-up Program that occurred in 3uly. He stated that as approved by the Board of County Commissioners the landfill. were opened Sundays during the weekends in 3uly, adding that ~ there was 742 tons of refuse collected. He stated that the program was successful and he is requesting that the General ~und reimburse the Enterprise account in the amount of $12,035.96. Commissioner Holland moved, .econded by Commissioner Ha... and carried unaniaously, that the transfer of $12,035.96 from the General Pund into the Solid Waste Enterpriee Account for expenses incurred in the County-wid. Clean-Up Program be approved. Commissioner Pistor directed Public Works Administrator Archibald to bring back a report to the Board of County Commis.ioners indicating if another clean-up period is needed and when, as well as indicating . the type of material that was collected during the last clean-up period. Item #13 AUTHORIZATION GRANTED TO PROCEED WITH AND COMPLETE SECONDARY ROAD PR03ECTS AT MOORINGS PARK AND GOODLETTE/rRANX ROAD AND AT 1ST AVENUE S.W. AND CYPRESS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WITH GAS TAX FUNDS Public Works Administrator Archibald stated that there are two small projects under this item, adding that one deals with the entrance of Moorings Park and Goodlette/Frank Road, which is to install shoulder mounted flashing lights which would be a jOint effort Page 20 - - .. "~~--- " -- price of the project would be around $8,000. He stated that the other with the Moorings Park Development. He stated that the estimated August 19, 1986 project is the paving of 1st Avenue, S.W., which leads into the new school in Golden Gate Estates, Cypress Elementary ~chool, off Golden Gate Blvd. He stated that the Department is in the process of completing some bikepath construction to the school and part of the project was to provide a surface on 1st Avenue, S.W. He stated that he would like to proceed with the projects uSing the gas tax funds. and, that this should be completed within two weeks. Commissioner Holland moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimoUSly, that authorization be granted to proceed with and complete secondary road projects at Moorings Park and Goodlette/Prank Road and at 1st Avenue S.W. and Cypress EleMentary School using gas tax funds. Item #14 ..... Recess: 10:1ð A.M. - Reconvened: 10:20 A.M. ..... OßIVERsITY OP SOUTH FLORIDA TO BE ENGAGED TO REVIEW AND INVESTIGATE SPECIPIC ALLBGATIONS AGAINST THE COUNTY MANAGER RELATIVE TO THE RESIGNATION OF A PORMER EMPLOYEE - APPROVED, SUB3ECT TO THE MATTER EING COORDINATED WITH THB STATE ATTORNEY'S 0 ICE ... Commissioner Voss stated that there have been specific allegations relative to the issues arising from the resignation of Vickie Mullins as the Community Development Administrator and he feels that it would , behoove the Board of County Commissioners to settle the matter as quickly as Possible. He stated that there are two Possible ... lOOK 098 PAr,~ 284 Page 21 -'~-"'-"'- tOOt 096,.i285 other is the question of management style. He stated that at the .ituations, one is the possibility of some criminal action and the August 19, 1986 request of Commissioner Holland, the State Attorney is going to investigate the matter but it may be several months before he can do ~ it. He .tated that with regards to management style, the matter should be cleared up as th~s is owed to the citizens of Collier County, to the County Manager, and to the Board of ~ounty Commissioners. He stated that last week he talked with several orga- nizations that do this type of a study, including Florida State University, University of South Florida, Arthur Young, and Mel" Reed « Associates, and asked them under what circumstances, what cost, how long it would take to do the job and when they could get started with .uch an investigation. He state~ that he met with members of the mind, adding that they all concurred with his recommendation, except Conservancy and the Board of Realtors and explained what he had in the Civic Association, the City, the League of Women Voters, the Chamber of Commerce, the Bar Association, Cray~on Road Association, people could do this. He stated that for $5,000 Florida State for the League of Women Voters who felt that a committee of local University will come in and take a fast look at management styles and have their report completed by September 18, 1986, but he does not feel that the fast look would bring out the final conclusions that the stated that they could start the work within a week and their estimate . Board of County Commissioners is after. He noted that Arthur Young Page 22 - - .. ,..~,."....._-- /' August 19, 1986 is between $12-15,000; the University of South Florida could start on September 8, 1986, and their estimate was between $12-15,000. He noted that he talked with Mel Reed & Associates, who is a psychologist corporation and he does not feel that they offer the kind of invest1- gation that the County is looking for. He stated that he explained the investigation to each of the firms and told them that the County wanted to know if the management organization was &n appropriate one tor the County and whether it was being adhered to or not.' He stated that the best thing is to use Arthur Young or the University of South Florida aa the investigative bOdy and to get them started .. quickly as they have had some experience in the County and they are still as Possible. He stated that hie personal preference is Arthur Young came back with certain specific recommendations, most of which have good job, also. He noted that Arthur Young d1d a management audit and South Florida has a management organization and could probably do a Commissioners for about 3-1/2 years. He stated that the university of unbiased as they have not done work for the Board of County been augmented. He stated that the price of both groups is about the same, but Arthur Young could start more quickly than the University ot South Florida. Commissioner Hasse stated that he feels that there is a sufficient f amount of people in this County that could form a committee for such a project. He stated that having an outside firm is a thought, but he would like more information as to what they are expected to do. lOOK 096 PAr.! 286 Page 23 .~._~~-..._, -..-,....,.. lOOK 096nQÍ87 August 19, 1986 Commissioner Voss stated that an outside firm would present their findings to the Board of County Commissioners in writing and one of the advantages of uSing a body such as this is that there would be less chance of bias and the employees would probably feel freer to ~ talk to them than they would to local people. He stated that there has to be assurance that there is no reflection on any employee that talks and that cannot be done successfully with a local body of people. Commissioner Pistor stated that he has been considering such a committee from the beginning and he has talked with a lot of people and the unbiased neutral group amounts to only one person that would be willing to serve on the committee. He stated that if the matter is resolved in the near future, he feels that Commissioner Voss' suggestion has a lot of merit. Commissioner Holland questioned if anyone has checked with the State Attorney'. office to determine if this would interfere with their investigation, to which Commissioner Voss stated that he spoke with Mr. Pellechia of the State Attorney's office and was told that it might have some effect on the investigation in the long-run, but he understood the situation and as far as he was concerned the County could go ahead with it. Commissioner Voss stated that the scope of the investigation would be to include, but not necessarily to limit it to exploration of areas of acceptable and ethical governmental management practices relating Page 24 .. .. .. August 19, 1986 to the po.ition in the area of responsibility of the County Manager under the current County policies and procedures. He stated that it need. to be left broad, noting that they should have free reign. Commissioner Hasse stated that he would like to see the contract that is being proposed. Commissioner Voss stated that the Board of County Commissioners has to tell them that the County is willing to give them a contract so that they can come in with a proposal, adding that they cannot make it · lump sum contract because they do not know how long or what will be involved until they get into the investigation. Commissioner Pistor stated that there could be a minimum and a maximum price, noting that anything additional would have to come back before the Board of County Commissioners. He stated that the money matter could be voted on next week if the Commission preferred. Commissioner Goodnight stated that there are a number of people that feel that the Arthur Young Management report was the thing for' Collier County at the time, and she feels that Arthur Young is the firm that should be hired to perform the investigation as they have the knowledge of the County and whp.n their report was done, County Manager Lusk was not employed by the County. Tape .4 , County Attorney Cuyler stated that Arthur Young may be a little less likely to point out defects with the system that they suggested and a little more likely to find fault with the personnel as opposed aDDK 096 PAG! 288 Page 25 ~OO( 0961'AQ'289 August 19, 1986 to an independent party. He stated that he does not feel that Arthur Young would come in to the County and say that the fault is the structure that they proposed. County Manager Lusk stated that with regards to the Arthur Young report for Utilities, he has followed their report e~ctly as recom- .ended. He stated that if there are problems in Utilities, he is not sure that Arthur Young would be willing to say that there are problems. Commissioner Voss stated that he is not suggesting that anyone come in to indicate how the County should be organized, adding that he is suggesting that they take the organization as it is and see it it .1s working or not. He stated that there is an organizational chart and organizational structure and questions if it is working. He stated that if the Board of County Commissioners would like to have the University of South Florida, that is fine.with him. Commissioner Holland stated that the University of South Florida may be more likely to be completely open and he would like to see them considered. Commissioner Hasse stated that he feels that an outside firm will not get into all the details and he is interested in getting to the bottom of this matter to settle it once and for all. Mr. Henry Watkins, President of Naples Chamber of Commerce, stated that he would speak in support of Commissioner Voss' comments, adding that bringing somebody from the outside rather than a group of citi- Page 26 - - - ~.".,.~."",- .-- ./ .-...,..,-,,,..........._^<,.,-,~-,..__._,--..,....... August 19, 1986 zens would be more productive and the County staff might feel .freer to speak to them. Mr. 30e Grimm stated that it is clear to him that some fundamental issues must be considered in analyzing this matter, adding that any act of a public official to grant special consideration to anyone for any reason violates equal justice for all. He stated that Florida Statutes strive to guarantee open government throu¡h the Sunshine Law and the Public Records Law and Mr. Lusk has admitted in public hearings to acts which do not comply with the intent of those laws, adding that to the extent he may have acted on behalf of a com- .issloner does not mitigate the implications of his acts, it only aggravates them. Mr. Grimm stated that the Commissions allegiance should be to the County taxpayers rather than the County Manager, adding that the Board of County Commissioners has an obligation to terminate Mr. Lusk as the County Manager, and it should be done for cause promptly and that there be no consideration of severance benefits. He stated that if the Board of County Commissioners does not do this, they only cast more doubt on their own actions. He stated that maintaining credibi- lity with the citizens of this County and maintaining their confidence should be of concern1 to the Commission. He stated that there are legal questions involved, questions of governmental functions and the only proper forum for this investigation is a County or State-wide grand jury, which is already provided in the system. He stated that it is wasteful and foolish to spend money on an outside investigation. Page 27 BOOK (JDB P1(f290 r~~ ...~ 'OÐK' 096nr:! 291 August 19, 1986 Mr. Richard Braun stated that two weeks ago it was voted unani- aously to authorize the State Attorney to conduct a complete investi- gation and he does not feel that the taxpayers should be paying for a $1&-20,000 study until the State Attorney has completed his investiga- ~J.on. ~ Mr. Pickworth stated that several years ago there was a situation that arose where there was' a decision to be made an to whether to appoint a blue-ribbon committee or hire an outside consultant and at that time, a decision was made to appolnt an individual to investigate the matter, who happened to be himself. He stated that after going through that, there are serious problems with trying to appoint a com- mittee. He stated that there are hours and hours that have to be spent going through documents, listening to people talk and talking with people. He stated that the people that are needed will have the problem getting the available time that is nee~ed. He stated that ot the two alternatives, the consultants report would be more apt to give the Commission the results they are looking tor. Coamissioner Voss moved that the Board of County Commis.ioners engage the University of South Blorida to review and investigate spe- cific allegations relative to the issues arising from the resignation of Vickie Mullins, former Community Development Administrator, and that the scope of the undertaking tor this should include but not be limited to the exploration of areas of acceptable and ethical manage- aent, governmental management practices relating to the position and Page 28 .. .. .. "'____"_"....-. ..-"_.......~ ~ ø__~ Auguet n, 1986 area of re8PQnsibility of the County Manager under the current County policy and procedure. Commissioner Holland stated that he would like to see a proposal brought to the Commission as to that scope of work. Commissioner Pistor stated that final approval could be brought back next week, but the contract has to be put together with the scope of work as outlined in Commissioner Voss' ~otion. Commissioner Holland stated that he would like to add to the action, with the perm1s&10n of Commissioner Voss, that this matter be coordinat.d with the State Attorney's office, adding that as long as the University of South Flórida works with the State Attorney's understanding of what they are doing. Commissioner Voss agreed to this and Commissioner Holland seconded the aotion. Upon call for the question, the motion carried 4/1, (Commissioner Hasse opposed). Ite. .15 PORTIOII OF A CONTRACT WITH HOLE, MONTES a ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE DBSIGlI OF PHASE I - SOUTH COUlfTY REGIONAL SEWER TRANSMISSION AND EFrLUBlfT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM - APPROVED AND CONTRACT TO BE BROUGHT BAC1t III TWO WBIŒS Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that on 3uly 22, 1986, he was authorized to negotiate a contract with Hole, Montes & Associates for the Phase I sewef transmission effluent distribution system design for the South Count)' system. He stated that he has been actively negotiating the contract and final terms were decided on August 18, 1986. ,He stated that what he needs from the Boa~d this date is to , aOOK (J~f)p~r,r ~!1~ Page 29 "_..~"---_..._-- ,oaK 096 PAf,t 293 August 19, 1986 allow him to enter into an agreement for services for the first por- tion of this contract and bring it back two weeks from this date. He stated that the contract will include the eervices that are being approved this date, adding that he needs to move ahead with this to ~ meet the agreement schedule that was signed for DER to meet the grant eligibility. He stated that this will be subcontract work that will be part of the contract that will be brought back in two weeks. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Co~œissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that the portion of the contract with Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. for the design of Phase I, South County Regional Sewer Transmission and effluent distribution system be approved and that the budget amendment relating to same be approved. i.' Page 30 - - .. -........ , IOtIK 096 f1~~ 295 August 19, 1986 It_ #18 STUDY TO BB CONDUCTED BY FRIZZELL ARCHITBCTS REGARDING CONTROLLING THE HUMIDITY IN THE COURTROOMS AND BUILDING F, 3RD PLOOR - APPROVED IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 82.400 Facilities Management Director Skip Camp stated that tor about ~ $2,400, Frizzell Architects could determine the humidity problems that are occurring in Buildings "A" and "P". He noted that this would take about two weeks. In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Camp stated that after the problems have been determined, the actual work could probably be done in-house. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimou~ly~ that the study be conducted by Frizzell I Architects regarding controlling the humidity in the courtrooms and Building F, 3rd Ploor, not to exceed $2,400. Item #17 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE FOR THE COUNTY MANAGER'S AGENCY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1985-87 - APPROVED Personnel Director Ochs stated that this is a recommendation to approve the organizational structure for the County Manager's agency for 1986-87, adding that the basic change between the current organi- zational plan and what is being proposed is the establishment of an Administrative Services Division with responsibility tor managing Personnel, Risk Man~gement, Purchasing, BUdget and the Helicopter operations. He stated that the proposed plan would result in five Page 31 .. - .. '>_..'.."""'__,4- August 19, 1986 basic divisions with each division administrator reporting directly to the County Manager. County Manager Lusk stated that the people should not fit the organization, adding that the organization should fit the people. He atated that there is a Deputy Assistant County Manager that will be leaving and there are stronger Division Directors than there has been in the past, adding that he is taking an organizat!onal structure that fits the concept of having only one County ~anager and some strong Division Directors. In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Lusk stated that the Assistant County Manager does not have line authority, which is the actual overseeing of the Division, adding that the Assistant County Manager speaks for the County Manager in the County Manager's place. ¡.¡ He stated that each Division Director will answer directly to the County Manager. Commissioner Holland stated that he would request that the Personnel Director be appointed as Acting Administrative Services Administrator instead of Administrative Services Administrator as the Executive Summary indicates. He stated that he has not been here long enough to have the expertise or the knowledge of each of the depart- ments that he will have authority over. t Mr. Lusk stated that he is a probationary employee the first six aonths in the job, adding that he has previously been an Administra- tive Services Director, and has had risk management, purchasing and aDDK 096 PAGr 296 Page 32 ._"""'""."",,"..... ..""_"......""_,.._.__,"'''''''.-..o·'"._..~......, \at 096 PAr,~ 291 August 19, 1986 other departments under hi. in the past. He stated that he is still a probationary employee, which is basically the same as acting. Commissioner Holland stated that he does not doubt the capab11i- ties of thie employee, but he would like to have a chance to go over ~ his qualifications. Commissioner Pi.tor stated that this is basically approving an o~ganizational chart and Mr. Ochs is on a 6-month probationary period which, therefore, means that he ls basically an acting Administrative Services Administrator until the 6 months are up. He stated that what needs·to be done this date ie to approve the organizational chart. Commissioner Voss stated that the way the chart has been drawn, the Assistant County Manager has the authority over all the divisions, adding that he teels that this is the way it should be. Mr. Lusk stated that the Assistant County Man~ger holds the authority through the County Manager, adding that if the Division Director goes directly to the County Manager he is not going around the Assistant County Manager as he has that right. He stated that the Division Directors will be reporting directly to the County Manager, adding that the Assistant County Manager is working for him directing those Division Heads through him. He stated that two people are not needed to run the Division Heads, adding that there has to be one final decision and that decision is the County Manager's. He stated that there has been communication problems and the weekly Statt meetings are going to be held again with the Division Directors. Tape #8 Page 33 - .. - / August 19, 1986 A.sistant County Manager Dorrill stated that the County Manager will be responsible for perrorming the annual merit review and eva- luations for not only the Assistant County Manager, but the rive Division Heads also. He stated that in terms or day-to-day activi- tie., the Division Heads are expected to run their division and in terms of running the overall operation, the Assistant County Manager will have some increased responsibilities and the County Manager remains the sole responsibility in terms or operatlng the County. He stated that he does not see any problems wlth it. Mr. Lusk stated that this is not consistent with the Arthur Young report as that report sets up the Assistant County Manager to have line authority over Public ~ervices and Administrative Services. He stated that his Assistant County Manager has a lot to do with Resource Recovery and the special projects, which is why he is not going along with the Arthur Young recolllJllendation. Coamissioner Voss moved, seconded by Coamissioner Hasse and carried unaniaously, that the organizational structure a. proposed. the new position title and the budget amendments as required be approved. Ite. #18 REsOURCE RECOVERY ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS AND PERMITS TO BE REVIEWED AJfD OBTAINED nOM STATE AGENCIES AND EAC TO ALSO REVIEW FOR ANY ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. EAC REVIEW TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 120 DAYS. COUNTY ATTORNEY TO REPORT BACK TO BCC IF THERE ARE ANY LEGAL PROBLEMS REGARDING THE TIMETABLE FOR SAID PROJECT Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that on August 8, 1986, a letter was received from Mark Benedict, the Chairman of the 800K D9ô PAr.! 298' Page 34 'OÐ~ OBB",,! 299 August 19, 1986 Environmental Advisory Council, regarding the Resource Recovery Facility. He stated that the EAC has indicated that the environmental aspects of the plant should be reviewed by them with regards to the provisional use amendment that is being petitioned by the County. He t noted that during 1985, the County received a provisional use for the present landfill and as a result of trying to obtain some environmen- tal permits, the County offered to move the site 93 feet in order to save some cypress trees. He stated that petition has been continued at Staff's request as a result of the EAC wanting to relook or review environmental aspects pertaining to the Plant. He stated that there is a list of major environmental permits that are required for this facility which includes an Air Quality permit, a Solid Waste permit, Water Line permit, Consumptive Water Well permits, Surface Water Control permits, Landfill Operation permits, Dredge and rill permits, tree removal permits, and groundwater monitoring permits. He stated that the jurisdiction in the State of Florida rests with State agen- cies whether they are environmental regulations, the water management district, or th~ Army Corps of Engineers. He stated that Staff has indicated that there would be needless duplication of effort to have the EAC review the environmental aspects of this plant as a result of trying to move the site 93 feet and that proper Jurisdiction, public hearing, public comment under Florida law are with the appropriate State agencies. He stated that the permits by enlarge are in, adding that the major permit is the Air Quality permit which allows for the Page 3ð - - .. " August 19, 1986 construction of the plant itself. He stated that permit is i~ and has been reviewed and the DER has released their intent to issue that per- mit based on their review and evaluation of it. He stated that currently the County is under a pUblic comment period and he does not doubt that there will be request made to intervene against that per- 8it, adding that there will ultimately be a major public hearing con- ducted by the State to review the aspects of that permit. He stated that the other permits are pretty much running consecutively with the air quality permit. Mr. Raymond Link, representing the Environmental Advisory Council, .tated that following the continuance of the Resource Recovery Provisional Use petition, the Collier County EAC voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners give the EAC and pro- tessional staff of the County's Environmental Science and Pollution Control, Natural Resources Management, and Water Management Departments the opportunity to review the environmental aspects of the Collier County Resource Recovery plant. He stated that these review entities have not been given any chance to comment on the plants potential environmental consequences. He stated that now that permit applications and supportive data have been submItted to state regula- tory agencies, it seems appropriate that the Environmental Staff and f appointed advisory bodies review and make comments to the Board of County Commissioners pertaining to this significant environmental issue. He stated that when the zoning was approved for the Resource Page 36 . aODK 096 PAr,¡ 3'00 _"~....~,.._<~_..,.,...",_.,, ·V'·_'-·"·'""·~' .,~~_ 1<. t196nf'. 301 J;', ').; , .,~ , August 19, 1986 Recovery Plant in December by the EAC, there was a stipulation that technical data addressing the impact be forthcoming, adding that as of this date that has not been the case. He indicated that the EIS Ordinance provides for local review within the parameters of said ordinance. He stated that the people that will be a~ersely affected or benefited by this plant live in Collier County and the EAC should have the opportunity to review this matter. Mr. Bob Krasowski, representing the Democrats Environmental Committee, stated that he is urging the Commissioners to honor the BAC's request for review of the proposed waste facility. He stated that the State agencies listed in the executive summary do not full represent county interests, adding that what is acceptable to the State may not be acceptable to the County. He stated that the citi- zens of the Coun'~y are entitled to local review by the agencies. Mr. Bill Harding representing the Consérvancy stated that he is in support of the EAC's recommendation that the County staff review the Resource Recovery Project and comment on its potential environmental consequences. He stated that the County government has trained pro- fessionals with expertise to have been employed for the express pur- pose of reviewing such projects. He stated that their input is essential for a proper evaluation of the Resource Recovery Plant. He stated that the Conservancy endorses the concept of resource recovery, but is withholding support of this project at this point until their environmental concerns are resolved. He stated that if all the local ....' . Page 37 .. .. .. _......,._.,""'...."'~"'"'-"."-'^''''''."..'"'-~---- August 19, 1986 agencies had reviewed this matt.r, the State Air Quality hearings would not be n.c....ry. He .tated that the Conserv.ncy is urging the Board of County Commissioners to allow the Staff to review the project a. the EAC recommends. Commissioner Pistor stated that this has been going on for three years now and he does not understand why all of a sudden these issues are coming up now. Commission.r Goodnight question.d if it is the intent of the EAC to hold up any permitting process, to which Mr. Link replied negati- vely. Commissioner Goodnight stated that she served on the Parks « R.cr.ation Advisory Board ~ few years ago and it was very upsetting th.t the Board of County Commissioners at that time, would make deci- 8ions about ParkÐ & Recreation and yet the Parks & R.creation Advisory Board had n.ver had the opportunity to review the matter. She indi- cated that these .dvisory boards should be used for everything that is in their field or either be abolished. Comaissioner Holland moved, that the Board r.quest that any addi- tional environm.ntal review concerning the Resource Recovery Plant be includ.d as part of the state ag.ncies review and that the local EAC also review it before any construction is done. County Manager Lµsk stated that the EAC wants to look at this, but the Environmental Staff has a little bit of a conflict as they have been used in the past and they will be used in the future to obtain permits from these state agencies. He stated that during the review aOOK {J96 PAG£ 3'02 Page 38 ~uoo~~œ August 19, 1986 he is not sure how biased or unbiased the County staff will be as they are County employees needed to work with the County during the environmental hearings. Commissioner Holland stated that he thinks that Staff should hold úp on any permits until the review is completed on a ~ocal level. Mr. Link stated that the EAC is trying to do what is best for the future of Collier County and the people in it, adding that it does not make any difference whether the people are paid by the County or donate their time. Assistant County Manager Dorrl11 stated that a Solid Waste Advisory Board was created to review this matter and now at the end of three years if the Staff has to go back and come through a totally different advisory board, then some parameters need to be set for Staff and the Ad,pi~ory Boards. Me noted that the County is four- laning roads allover the County and it is not'necessary to go through the environmental advisory board every time a road is built, adding that the County is obligated to get all the necessary environmental permits from the state if a wetland area is effected, storm water management or surface water quality. He stated that if the Board of County Commissioners wants the advisory committee to review the contract that was signed a year ago, it needs to be understood what they are to review. Commissioner Voss stated that if there is any concerns about the quality, it would be logical to attend the pUblic hearings that the Page 39 .. .. .. August 19, 1986 .tate agencies will have, adding that it should not be complicated by putting the matter before another agency when there is already 9 that it has to go before. Commissioner Holland stated that hè has dealt with the State enough to know that one of the Governor's prime objectives is to get Collier County to be the first to have a resource recovery plant. He stated that he is objecting to Staff's recommendation because he did not agree with Staff in the beginning and h~ did not vote for this plant because he did not have the information that he wanted. He stated that anything that can be done to guarantee the safety and weltare of the people of Collier County should be done. Tape .15 Commissioner Holland stated that according to his motion, there will be no actual construction until the report is received from the DC. County Manager tusk 8tated that the County still has to proceed with getting the permits, and Commissioner Holland stated that the County can proceed with obtaining permits, but no construction will be done. Commissioner Hasse seconded the motion. Commissioner Voss amended the motion to include that EAC be given eo days to conduct their investigation and report back. Commissioner Pistor seconded the amendment to the motion. Commissioner Holland amended the amendment to the motion to 120 days and Commissioner Hasse seconded it. &OOK 096 PAf.I. 304 .Page 40 "..".,.,.....,,~----_._- aODK 096,m305 August 19, 1986 Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that this could impose some additional restrictions on Westinghouse that they have no obliga- tion to meet and for which the County may have some liability. He stated that the original target to obtain the permits, have the agreements, and convert the escrow money into construbtion money was October 1, 1986, which can be extended. He stated that if all permits are in hand by October 1, 1986, Westinghouse is obligated to proceed with construction and tho County is going to be sitting on top of an arbitrator decision to have a committee review the aspects of the plant ,in 120 days. He stated that he is questioning some of the legal a_peets of whether the County can impose additional restrictions on Westinghouse at this point. County Attorney Cuyler stated that he is not certain what the legal ramifications or delays may be at this point, but he would ask that the Board continue this item for a week or as part of the motion, have it understood that he may come back indicating that under certain timetables that the Board has agreed to, there are legal problems and what they are. Commissioner Holland stated that he would agree to adding to his action that County Attorney Cuyler come back to the Board if there are any legal problems concerning this matter. ..... Commissioner Pistor lett the meeting at this time ..... Upon call for the question of the first amendment regarding the time limit of 60 days, the motion failed 3/1, (Commissioners Holland, Haase, and Qoodnight opposed). Page 41 - ~ .. ----"',...",.,...,._"'-_....,--~--- August 19, 1986 Upon call for the question of the amendment to the amendment regarding the time limit of 120 days, the motion carried 3/1, (Co..i..ioner Voss opposed). Upon call tor the question of the original motion to have the EAC review the issue a. well as the State agencies and that no construc- tion begin until the EAC has come back with their report and that the County Attorney come back to the Board if there are any legal probl..., the motion carried 4/0. It.. .1g UQt7ZST, nOM nORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL rOR BCC TO PURCHASE RADAR IQUIPMENT rOR THEM - DENIED County Manager Lusk stated that he had a request a tew weeks ago from the rlorida Highway .Patrol Rbout the Board buying them some addi- tional radar units for their use. He stated that this has been done in other Counties. Sargeant Nathan Stewart, District Supervisor for Florida Highway Patrol in Collier County, stated that he is requesting that the Coun~y approve the purchase of lð radar units tor use by the JrHP in Collier County and only in Collier County. He stated that this is a supple- ment to the equipment that the State provides tor the FH.P, adding that the State gets them on government grants and they do not get govern- .ent grants every year. He stated that in his 12 year career he has .een two grants for the purchase of radar equipment. He noted that the current equipment is two radar units for Collier County with 12 .... &ODK 096 PAG! 300 Page 42 ~ '. .. .OOK C96,AGr307 August 19, 1986 troopers and a supervisor. He stated that these units are used in an attempt to reduce the speeding and traffic accidents. He stated that these units are a needed item and can save lives. ~ Mr. Lusk stated that there are two factors; one, the additional safety on the highways and. two, additional revenue tor the County. He stated that it is a good idea for $10,000. Commissioner Hasse questioned how many units there are in the State of rlorida, to which Sargeant Stewart stated approximately ðOO. Commissioner Hasse questioned why this is not put on the State budget, to which Sargeant Stewart stated that he does not have any 1nput 1nto the bUdget that the FHP operates on. Sargeant Stewart stated that there are pr10rities w1th the State and they are att~mpting to build a highway patrol station here in Collier County. He stated that they have to purchase vehicles which cost $1&-20,000 each when they are equipped. He noted that the State 1. attempting to get a tower for Collier County. He reported that he i. trying to ge~ the troopers equipped with a radar unit in an attempt to entorce the laws a little more str1ngently. Commissioner Holland asked what happened to the other radar units that used to be in the other vehicles, to which Sargeant Stewart stated that Collier County was originally allocated 7 units, noting that there are two of them that ar.e working and sometimes they do not. He stated that one burned in a car fire on Alligator Alley and the rest are down for repairs. He stated that the State has allocated Page 43 ~. " - - .. .. " . .' ,', ,....:- ~ . """'~~f' /~~~~~:~;. 7£~~i-:· , ,....j,.f..".¡ ";¡'-f¡~1í ' ~t~'t.~~ 2 ':;~""" ;. 4~ _" <l!}>t;.'S~ ,', ."""..,..,~. .. ...." ;: ;\;~:,: , , f.' ~ ,'::..~ -',,' .' August 19, 1986 . $1.000 for radar. repairs this year which means, they will probably . receive the units back next summer. He indicated that four of them go up and then are down again tor re-certitication which is approximately sa months. Commissioner Holland stated that he received a call from the State Representative's office and she was of the opinion that this is something that should have been addressed in Tallahassee. He stated that if the County does buy them, they would have to be dohated to the State Patrol or accept the liability if there were any suits involved because of these radar units. Mr. 30hn tuk08ky stated that he has known Sargeant Stewart for aany years and he is a fine' officer" but he does not feel that the County should s~pply the State of Florida with radar units because this will be the start where the local taxpayers will be asked to pay for everything. He stated that he is for safety, but the State. the Governor, and the Representatives of the State have a legal, moral ,. and judiciary responsibill ty and llabill ty to provide equipment for the State cars. He stated that presently there are 1,120 radar units in the State of Jrlorida with 200-300 inoperative, which represents broken promises'of revenue income, safety, and law entorcement. He stated that the JrHP Department can solve their own problems with , . ,¡''. ~Resource Management within their own agency. He stated that the ~~ate ;~';p .' - ....jit: 'C ~ .." aOOK 096 PAGt 3'08 .. .,t NO PAGE 309 or 310 ~ Page 44 ~ " ~ ..' I r ¡ Clu~ l..(.~t 19 ,e:¡ i'b f' ;r o. h ~ ' I' ;.' . t,:. ,>. NO PAGE 0 309 P5 ,~S Qu..sus T Ie¡, I 'f ~ '- NO PAGE 310 ~ ;, PS .4,b .. . lOOt 096f1Af,!311 August 19, 19Se Coordinator should be pursuing the grants that are available to He stated that the funds from overtime comes from grants and >'";.f" ~c.~~;,.~~.~ , " /':êould .~~,¿ t';.:-, at overtime. A~. ' Coun ty' s own "" be used for the radar equipment by cutting back on a tew hours .¡. H~ stated that the County's first obligation is, to the Sheriff's Department. He stated that the County cannot .afford the tunding of State agencies unless Collier County citizens , are deprived of much needed equipment. " ¡.,- ,.' Tape .'1. :~~~.. ¡,. ....~'"~;.., Ml',.Richard Braun stated that the Commission should vote against . :··;,C1b.., the County buying units for state vehicles. He stated that the .. . Sargeant should be' going to the State Legislature to ask for these J.\. funds. . Commissioner Hasse moved, seconded by Comm~ssioner Holland and carried unanimously, that the request for radar units for the Highway Patrol be denied. ..... Recess: 12:1ð P.M. - Reconvened: 2:00 P.M. at which time Deputy Clerk Ruiz replaced Deputy Clerk Kenyon ..... Item .20 CHANGE ORDER IN AMOUNT or $1,540 rOR BID NO. 86-947 TO NAPLES JrLOOR COVERING rOR ALTERNATIVE CARPET TILES FOR BUILDING "D" - APPROVED ,. Skip Camp, Director, Department of Facilities Management~ stated that in reference to the contract tor carpet tile to Naples Floor Covering, the manufacturer, Bigelow Corporation, informed the staft August lð, 1986, that they were not able to provide the carpet tile for BUilding "D" by the first installation date because of an Page 47 .. ~- . ~. t·· . , August 19, 1986 "in-house" problem. He indicated that a manufacturer, Milliken, was found who could produce the product on time. He eaid that it is staft's recommendation that Milliken be approved for the project using the same local carpet dealer. He added that the cost difference would be $1,&40 but it would facilitate the established construction and occupancy schedules. Commissioner Voss asked if this carpet tile will match the tiles on the 8th floor, or would two stockpiles be kept in reserve? Mr. Camp stated that because they are different lots, there is an automa- tic 3' overage so that installation can be serviced, adding that the 8th floor tile was provided by Kraft Construction. He added that Bigelow has a fine reputation and assured staff that they will be able to meet the next two deadlines. Co.-is.ioner Vas. moved, .econded by Commissioner Holland and carried unanimously, that the alternative carpet tile for Building "D" be accepted and a Change Order in the amount of $1,ð40 to Naples FlOor Covering be apprQVed. Nota: Change Order not received in office of Clerk of the Board .. of 8/26/815. Ite. .21 RESOLUTION 86-142 RE SETTLEMENT O:r:rER or WESTERN WORLD INS. COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $119,082.4ð AND CIGNA IN THE AMOUNT OF $4ð,000 AS REIMBURSEMENT rOR ATTORNEY'S rEES AND COSTS INCURRED DURING THE EAST NAPLES WATER SYSTEMS, INC., THE GLADES, INC. AND HUBSCHMAN ASSOCIATES LITIGATION - ADO.PTED. COUNTY ATTORNEY AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS TO EFFECT THIS RESOLUTION - A.P.PROVED County Attorney Cuyler stated that the County has received final otters from Western World in the amount of $119,082.4ð and from CIGNA aDOK U9ô W,! 3tt Page 48 ~... " ~ ""-,,,,,,-~-,.,...--,,,,,,.~,".,-,,..,,.........,. &OO~ OOOnr;t313 August 19, 1986 in the amount of $4ð,000, and this means that over 9ð~ of the costs expended in the Hubschman, The Glades and East Naples Water Systems, Inc. litigation will be recovered. He indicated that it is staff's recommendation that the Board accept this settlement offer. ~ Mr. Cuyler stated that he needs the Board's authorization to exe- cute releases or other documents in order to finalize the resolution. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissionftr Hasse and carried unani.oualy, that Resolution 86-142 re settlement otfer ot Western World Insurancs Company in the amount $119,082,4ð and CIGNA in the aaount of $4&,000 as rei.bursement tor attorney's fees and costs incurred during the East Naples Water Systems, Inc., The Glades, Inc. and Bubschman A.sociates litigation, be adopted and the County Attorney authorized to execute the necessary documents to effect this tinal resolution. .Page 49 - .. .. .~ August 19, 1986 It.. .22 ROUTINE BILLS - APPROVED rOR PAYMENT Pursuant to Resolution 81-150 the following checks were issued through Friday, August 1ð, 1986, in payment of routine bills: CHEC~ DESCRIPTION CHECK NOS. AMOUNT Vendors 146254 - 147ð16 $1,068,238.30 Ite. .23 BUDGET AMENDMENTS 815-394, 86-397 /398 AND 86- ,400 - ADOPTED Co.-is. loner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commissioner Voss and carried unanimously, that Budget Amendments 86-394, 86-397/398 and 815-400 be adopted. It.. #24 COMMISSIONER PISTOR TO SERVE OR THE CANVASSING BOARD FOR ~RIMARY BLECTIONS AND COMMISSIONER GOODNIGHT TO SERVE rOR PRIMARY/GENERAL ELECTIONS - APPROVED Commissioner Pis tor stated that the leader of the group that is trying to incorporate Marco Island has notified the Supervisor of Elections that it he serves on the Canvassing Board at the general election that they will automatically call tor a recount, and rather than go through that he would ask Mrs. Goodnigh~ to do it. Commi.sioner Goodnight stated that she would not mind canvassing all three elections.' Co..issioner Holland moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried unanimously, that Commissioner Goodnight be selected to serve BOOK 096 PAr;! 316 Page ðO ......,"~"<""'-..«_.,"""-----_...~.............'-~"',....'.._. IGG~ C96PAGt317 August 19, 1986 on ~he Canvassing Board for the general election and poseibly the primaries, and that Commissioner Pis tor serve on the Canvassing Board tor the primary elections. Ite. .25 ~ SELECTION OP ENHANCED 911 SYSTEM - APPROVED Don Hunter, Deputy Chief, Sheriff's Office, stated that he had been requested by Commissioner Voss to prepare a report and come back to the Board on the current status of the study that is underway regarding an enhancement to the existing 911 System on which there has been quite an investment of money in the past 14 years. He noted that etaff has met w~th United Telepnone Service representatives and tech- niciane trying to determine what configuration would interface with the eXieting Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) system which was purchased in 1983. He eaid that UTS has given tentative. quotes which need to be revieed because of the interface problems and some unknowns concerning what the probable equipment would be in order to create that inter- face. Deputy Chief Hunter stated that the total one-time cost has been tentatively quoted not to exceed $300,000, and that would be for hard- ware, principally, and some software. There will be, he added, some on-going monthly charges and there is no quote available on that at this time due to some unknowns in the configuration. He indicated that staff is close to being finished with defining what presently existe and bow to interface with AT&T to make it come out correctly, but three or four more weeks are needed. Page !51 .. .. .. August 19, 1986 Coamissioner Pistor asked if the $300,000 is just for equipment at the Courthouse Complex or does it include the additional UTS equipment at the switching stations? Mr. Hunter stated that it is tor equipment at the Complex. Ms. Mary Warfield with United Telephone Service stated that the start-up charge includes the circuitry, that is, the installation charge. as part of the not-enhanced 911 that it takes to run from the central office of UTS into the designated 911 locations, i~ also includes the database gathering information and anyone-time charges that would be faced by the installation of 911; one of the one-time charges would be for the equipment that would work with the enhanced 911, because it is quite different and it has been upgraded and is sophisticated. Commissioner Pistor asked if the equipment at each area switching station tie. in with the main office? Ms. Warfield stated that circuit lines will be brought from ths central offices to a main switch in ' Port Myers, which is supplied by UTS because of the numerous enhanced 911's throughout the Southern Division who will be using the switch, and from that switch the calls are relayed to the proper 911 loca- tions. She said that the up-front expenditure~ the County will have for equipment will be the actual equipment located on the premises of the 911 answering locations, and these are the equipment box which handles the automatic number identification and the data box that has modums and handles the information coming back from a database on an aOOK 096 PA';! 318 Page 52 11RI( 096PJ;' g19 August 19, 1986 automatic line identification. She said that this is the equipment that has been priced out in the start-up charges and the on-going aonthly charges. Ms. Warfield indicated that all of the equipment outlined will ~ interface with the eXisting equipment at the 911 locations. Commissioner Pistor asked if there will be a chart showing the location, street and phone number? Mr. Hunter stated that the idea is not to jU8t show the phone number, but a180 provide the address and location of the particular phone call origin. Commissioner Voss asked if the authorization of the State to levy up to 60 cents per phone for 18 months applie8 to the installation of the new equipment and not for the monthly charges? Mr. Hunter answered affirmatively. Commissioner V08S asked if the monthly charge then becomes a budget item in the future, once the system is Installed? Mr. Hunter answered affirmatively. Commissioner Voss asked when will a definite cost for the system be available? Mr. Hunter stated three or four weeks. Commissioner Voss stated that if the Board expressed its intent to go ahead with the system, it would want to know before the budget year starts so it can be put this item Into the budget. Mr. Hunter stated that the figures should be available before October 1st. Commissioner Voss stated that Bonita Shores and Little Hickory Shores' switching centers are in Bonita Springs, but they have a 911 number, and asked if that would be included in thi8 8ystem? Ms. Warfield answered affirmatively. Page 53 .. - .. ,~' .,. Augu.t 19, 1986 Co..i..ioner Ha..e asked in reference to the 8ubstation., where do they get their call. from? Mr. Hunter stated that if an indiv)dual dial. 911, it automatically rings in the central Sheriff'. otfice; if a .ubstation happens to get an extraneous call oft the 911 .ystem, aeaning this particular citizen i. not using 911 but i. dialing directly into a sub.tation, the Sheriff'. office would .till receive thet call. He added that at night the call come. beck to the Sheriff'. office for forwarding and then it is dispatched.. Commissioner Hasse ..ked if there i. a printout on the 911 calls? Mr. Hunter stated that there is a detailed printout. Mr. Hunter .tated that the Division of Communication. ha. to review the tentative plan fÞr the operation of the enhanced 911 Sy.tem, and .tatt doe. not know how long that review might take, pro- bably 2 to 3 months, and beyond that UTS has indicated that because of a street survey and the development of the hardware, it will take approximately 18 to 24 months betore the system can be implemented from the date the Board agrees to go ahead. Commis.ioner Voss stated that there is great need for this kinð of .y.tem and a. soon as the figure. are available it will be approved. Commi..ioner Pi.tor concurred. Commi..ioner Pi. tor a.ked if pay phone. are included in this .y.tem? Mr. Hunter ånswered that they are included. Comaj..ioner Vo.. moved, .econded by Commi..ioner Ha..e and carried unanimously, that the Board expre..es its intent to pursue the selection of the enhanced 911 System. &ODI( (]96 Psr.r 320 Page 64 lOOK' 096 I'A('{ 321 August 19, 1986 It.. #26 COMMISSIORER BOLLAND, MICHAEL .TBRXIGAK, RAY BARKETT AND GEORGE FRAZER APPOIKTID TO SERVE TWO-YEAR TERMS ON THE DISTRICT EIGHT ALCOHOL, DRUG ABUSE AND MEXTAL HEALTH PLAKRINO COUNCIL - APPROVED . Commissioner Pi.tor stated that Commissioner HOllan~, Michael 3ernigan, Ray Barnett and George Frazer have been serving on this com- mittee for at least two years, and he received a letter from Nicholas C.Anthony, District prograa Supervisor, sugge.ting that the Board re- appoint the.. tour gentle..n .inc. they are acquainted with the work and have done a fine job. CO.-lssloner Goodnight .oved, seconded by Commissioner Voss and carried unanimously, that Commissioner Holland, Michael 3ernigan, Ray Barnett and George Prazer be re-appointed to serve on the District Eight Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mantal Health Planning Council. Item #27 EXPENDITURE OF COUNTY GENERAL OPERATING J1't7NDS TO SECURE TWO-YEAR LEASE FOR MOBILE OrrICE SPACE FOR THE COLLIER COUNTY SBERIrr'S OrrICE AT IMMOnLEE SUBSTATION - APPROVED Deputy Chi.f Don Hunter, stated that the Collier County Sheriff'. Office currently has mobile office space that it is utilizing as a squad room at the Immokalee Substation, and they have been in that situation for approximately two years. He said that the mobile home, when first obtained, was in poor condition and it is currently irre- pairable; it is insecure, has holes in the floor and leaks in the root. He indicated that the Board is requested to recognize the need for additio~al space that will serve as a squad room and limited office space for CID investigators at the Immokalee Substation. Page 55 - - .. August 19, 1986 Commissioner Hasse asked if one of the mobile homes in this complex that will be vacated would be of use? Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that he can think of one that is at the County Barn, but the others are currently leased; the one at the Health Department hàs just been purchased and will not be vacant for at least two years. He noted that the one that Skip Camp and Bill Kaiser '1'ape .8 currently occupy that is owned by the County will be available as soon as the warehouse is completed in October. Commissioner Holland moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse, that the expendlture of funds to procure additional office spac. at the Iamokalee Subst~tion for use by the Collier County Sheriff's Office be approved. Commissioner GOOdnight stated that the space should be leased for a two-year period until the permanent quarters are improved. Coamissioner Holland amended his motion to include the two-year le... period. Open call for the qu.stion, the motion carried unanimously. ..... Commissioner Holland moved, s.conded by Commission.r Goodnight and carri.d unanimously, that the items under the Cons.nt Agenda be adopted and/or ~pproved: ..... Item #28 ~INAL ACCEPTANCE OF LAUREL OAK DR. PROM U.S. 41 TO STATION 8+82.04 AND JUDGE WOOD DR. PROM PELICAN BAY BLVD. TO LAUREL OAK DR. LOCATED IN PARCEL "B", PELICAN BAY UNIT Ii PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATOR AUTHORIZED TO RELEASE SECURITY (MAIR. BOND NO. 8101-27-65 PROM THE FEDERAL INS. COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF 841,070). aOOK 096 PAr.! 32Z Page 156 '~); fi; ~7Ji .~~<" li~~: 'oo~ 096 PA';~ 323 tj.· .;..., , ...... I August 19, 1986 It.. #2g I'IMAL ACCEPTANCE OF PELICAN BAY UNIT 4, PHASE 2, PUBLIC WORXS ADMINI- STRATOR AUTHORIZED TO RELEASE SECURITY (BOND NO. 8101-27-6& PROM FEDERAL INS. COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF 841,070). Ite. #30 ~ ACCEPTANCE & RECORDATION OF DOCUMENT CONVEYING DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG TRI WESTERLY &' OF LOT 28, BLOCX I, CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES. UNIT 2 See Page ..3 ,;}¿, It.. #31 Bt7DGET AIŒ1mMBNTS ESTABLISHING A RES]tRVE ACCOUNT IN :&"UND 31& It.. #32 I'ISCAL AMENDMIKT~ TO CONTRACT BETWEEN SCC AND THE DEPT. OF HEALTH . REHABILITATION SERVICES See Pages .3;¡ 7 - ~ ¿tð It.. #33 REPUKD OF SEWER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES IN AMOUNT 01' $18,000 TO DIVILOPER OF SOMMERWIND PROJECT It.. #301 -, IXTRA GAIN TIME FOR INMATE NO. 43170 It.. #3& MISCELLANEOUs CORRESPONDENCE - FILED AND/OR REFERRED There being no objection, the Chair directed that the following , correspondence be filed and/or referred to the various departments as .indicated below: 1. Budget Amendment received 7/30/86 for BCC approved Bid 86-945 for travel regarding the training of County employees to ser- vice equipment purchased from Office Furniture and Design. Referred to BCC and filed. Page 57 - , - .,~-...",.". '.. .. ~-6:~ . August 19, 1986 2. Letter dated 8/1/86 from o. M. Brooks, Director, Div. of Housing and Community Development, Dept. of Community Affairs, stating our County's position in the pre-appeals ranking of applications submitted for funding for the 1986-87 3uvenile 3ustice and Delinquency Prevention Program. Referred to Pam Brangaccio, Kevin O'Donnell and filed. 3. Letter dated 8/4/86 to Ms. Paula A. Church, Community Development, from Christina B. Canty, Community Redevelopment Administrator, Dept.of Community Affairs, regarding CDBG Contract #84LG-53-09-21-01-H34, Modification #5, and enclosing fUlly executed amendment to the Apalachicola CDBG. Referred to Pam Brangaccio, Community Development, 3ames C. Giles and filed. 4. Memo dated 8/1/86 from David W. York, Ph.D, P.E.,. Acting Chief, DER, regarding Environment~l Regulation Commission Consideration of Construction Grants Program Issues, and attaching agenda for August 20-21, 1986 Public Hearing Referred to Neil Dorrill, Tom Crandall and filed. ð. Letters dated 8/8/86 from Debra White, enclosing application (File No. 111235199; File No. 11123&189; and Pile No. 11123ð169, FL Dep~. of Transportation) which involves dredge and fill activities. Referred to Neil Dorrill, George . Archibald and filed. Memo ðated 8/6/88 from Kirby B. Green, Assistant Director, Div. of State Lands, DNR, regardlng Notice of proposed Agency RUlemaking and attaching proposed amendments to Chapter 18-20. Referred to Pam Brangaccio, Community Development, Dr. Proffitt and filed. 7;-',. Minutes: A. 1/3/86 & 1/11/86, CCPC and 8/1/86 agenda B. 1/1/86, Citizens Advisory Task Force and 1/31/86 agenda C. 9/1/86, EMSAC and 8/6/86 agenda D. 6/27/86, Library Advisory Board 8. Letter dated 8/12/86 to Lynn S. Bramle~t, Budget Specialist, Dept. of Revenue, from Commissioner 30hn A. Pistor, Chairman, regarding the Property Appraiser's budget. Referred to Sam Colding, BQC and filed. f aOIlK 096 PAr.{ 324 Page 58 ~ .. lOft 096 PA~t 325 August 19, 1986 ... There being no further business for the Good of the County, the .eeting was adjourned at 2:3ð P.M. by Order of the Chair. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/ BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFPICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL 9-~~ PISTOR, CHAIRMAN .. Board on~ ( /?/6 as or as corrected " i'i"j·' . , ,(' "1\' Page 59 " - - - "~'..'''..-. '. ·,.....·,_"'..,.....-.qIR'