The URL can be used to link to this page

BCC Minutes 09/23/1986 R Napl.., Flori~a, September 23, 1986 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and tor the County ot Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeal. and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "P" of the Courthouse Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: John A. Pistor VICE-CHAIRMAN: Anne Goodnight Frederick J. Voss Max A. Hasse ABSENT: C. C. "Red" Holland ALSO PRESENT: James C. Gil.s, Clerk; Maureen Kenyon and Carmen Ruiz (12:15 P.M.), Deputy Clerks; Donald B. tusk, County Manager:. Neil Dorrill, Assistant County Manager: Ken Cuyler, County Attorney: David Heigel, Bruce Anderson, and David Mourick, Assistant County Attorneys: Kevin O'Donnell, Public Services Administrator: Handa Jones, Economic Development Program Director: Ann McKim, Planner: Tom Crandall, Utilities Administrator; Mike MCNees, Ut~lities Administration Director: Joseph Magri, Building Code Compliance Director: Sherry Rynders, Risk Manager: Dave Pettrow, Zoni~q/Planning Director: Nina Small. Acting Community Development Administrator: Leo Ochs, Admini~trative Services Administrator: Nancy Israelson, Administrative~ssistant to the ßoard: and Deputy Chief Ray Barnett, Sheriff's Department. LCû~ 097 w.1512 Page 1 .. """"-,--."."".,.".."'..". ,-,----., -'-""."""""~".,,,,..,.... . ... 097 PA<;¡ 525 September 23, 1986 Tape '1 It.. .1 AGENDA - APPROVED HITH CHAN~!, Commissioner Voss move~, seconded by Commissioner Pae.. and - " carried 4/0, that the agen~a be approved with the following changee: .. Item l2E Added - regarding .ppointment of non-affili.ted member to Public Vehicle Advisory Committee. b. Item 14C(9) moved to 9Cl regarding Older Americane Act Title III-B ~rogram. c. Item l4~2 moved to 9C2 regarding Bid '86-1016, Parke Entrance Signs - Requested by Commie.ioner H.s.e. d. Item 14C5 moved to 9C3 regarding Change Orders for bermuda sod at North Naples and Golden Gate Community Parks - Requested by Commissioner Hasse. e. Item l2A regarding County Manager'. contract _ Hithdrawn at request ot Commiesioner Voes. f. Item lOA Added - regarding resolution issuing bonds tor $1,575,000 for Road Improvements _ Added by County Attorney Cuyler. Ite. .2 ~LOY!E SERVICE AHARD - PRESENTED Commissioner Pistor presented an Employee Service Award to Enrique Blanco, Road & Bridge Department, tor five years at service with the County. Ite. .3 RESOLUTION 86-175 FORMALIZING THE ACCEPTANCE, APPROVAL OF ADJPTION OF THE COUNTY HATER MASTER PLAN AND THE SOUTH COUNTY SEHER MASTER PLAN POR COLLIER COUNTY - ADOPTED Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that he is asking that this item be heard tirst as he makes reference to the otficial 8cce~- tance of tt.e water and sewer master plan in his presentation or. the item regarding system development charges and water rates. He stated Page 2 - - ""--""'--- ...... II.. _,,,,__;"_,,.,,...~,,, September 23. 1986 that these plans were .ccepted at a previous meeting and he is requeeting that a resolution be adopted this date to that .ftect. Commissioner Voee moved, seconded by Commissioner H.s.. and Sewer M.eter Plan tor Colli.r County b. .dopted. v.l of adoption ot the County H.ter Maeter Plan and the South County carried 4/0, that Resolution 86-17ð torm.lizing the acceptance, appro- - .. &1101( 097 P-'it 5:~6 Page 3 .. . ! --....._~".".,'- .-".-."...--". September 23, 1986 Itell .. RI~OLOTION 88-176 AMENDING THE PARKLANDS DEVELOPMENT ORDER .8&-4 RE ~~8STANT¡AL DEVIATION DETERMINATION - ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on Sept.~ber 7, 1986. as evidenced by Attidavit ot Publication tiled with t!le Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition PDA-86-13C, tiled by Attorney George Varnadoe requesting an amendment to the Parklands Development Order Number 85-4, as amended by Resolution Number 85-267, by amending section A.9.(g) relating to substantial deviation determination. Planner McKim etated that the Board of C~unty Commissioners approved the Development Order tor the Parklands on September 10, 1985, and on December 17, 1985, the Board approved a resolution amending that Development Order, which resulted in an appeal by the Southwest Plorida Regional Planning Council. She noted that the Plorida Department of Community Attairs appealed both the original Development Order as well as the amended Development O~der. She indicated that the proposed language ot this resolution will now resolve DCA's appeal and is more stringent than the original language and should, therefore, resolve all questions as it relates to the determination~t substantial deviation tor trattic. She etated that Staft recommends approval ot thiš resolution. She noted that whil^ prootreading this resolution, she tound two .~~or typographica1 errors whic~ she would like corrected, noting that the tirst one js 80D~ ()[)~P¡~¡ ~~~ Page 4 .. ....,~--- . . . '001( 097 PAr,l :)29 September 23, 1986 on Page 3, under Subsection b, changing the word ".xceed" to "exceeds" and the last page at the resolution should h.ve . "c" for Sub.ection "c." at the top ot the page prior to the word. "The Developer may continue....." .. - Commissioner Voss aoved, .econded by Commis.loner S.... and carried 4/0, that the public hearing be cloeed. Commissioner Voss Doved, seconded by Commissioner H.... and carri.d ./0, tha~ Resolution 86-176 r.garding P.tition PDA-86-13C, am.nding the parklands Development Order 'Bð-. a. ..ended by Re.olutlon 8ð-267, by amending S.ction A.I.(g) r.lating to .ub.tan- tIal devi.tion determination be adopted. Page ð - - - ~"~"",'''<~'''-"'"''-'''.''''''''-''.'='''^'';-'-",-",_. September 23. 1986 Item .11 ORDINANCE 86-8ð CREATING THE IMMOKALEE LIGHTING AND BEAUTIFICATION DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE - ADOPTED AS AMENDED. RESOLUTION 88-177 APPOINTING RITA AVALOS; RESOLUTION 86-178 APPOINTING STEPHEN F. GILLASPIE: RESOLUTION 86-179 APPOINTING FLORENCE JELKS. RESOLUTION 86-180 APPOINTING MARJORIE HALL: AND RESOLUTION 88-181 APPOINTING SAM R. LEE, JR. TO THE IMMOXALEE LIGHTING AND BEAUTIFICATION DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE - ADO~TED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily Newe on September 4, 1986, as evidenced by Attidavit of PUblication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to coneider an ordinance creating the Im~okalee Lighting and Beautitication District Advisory Committee. Assistant County Attorney Heigel stated ~hat the Board ot County Commissioners previously adopted Ordinance 77-52 which created the Immokalee Lighting and Beautification District ae a Municipal Service Taxing Unit. He stated that the ordinance provided tor the Board to appoint at their pleasure an advisory group to advise the Board on mattere pertaining to the District. He stated that the proposed ordinance provides tor a 7 member advisory committee that may be appointed by Resolution, adding that once this committee is appointed, they will aid and assist the Board in carrying out the purposes at the IlIImokalee Lighting and Beautitication Distr~.ct. He stated that t~ Committee shall recommend work programs and ~riori- ties to the County Public Horks~dministrator and assist in tudget~ry coneiderations, He stated that this ordinance is in contormance w1th the recently passed Ordinance 86-41 which pr~"ides tor advisory boards in g~neral, øonK (J£)jrp;;; ~~~ Page 6 .. .-....--"-"..........-.. · IOIlK 097 PA':.! 535 September 23, 1986 Commissioner Pis tor stated that he hae a proble~ with Section 6 ot thie ordinance regarding the reimbursement of expenses. He etated that most of these volunteer committees do not have th~t type ot a clause in it. He stated that the only Committee that he knowe ot that can receive reimbursement is the CCPC, which has to be appr~ved prior to the expense. Assistant County Attorney Heigel stated that the concept ot thie claus. was that the Board would have the authority to approve or deny any type of expenses. Commissioner Voss stated that where it reads upon the approval ot the Board ot County Commissioners, it could read Upon "prior" approval at the Board ot County Commissioners. Commissioner Hasse stated that he would prefer to have the eection deleted completely. Commissioner Goodnight stated that she suggested that Section 6 be left in the ordinance because it stated that the Board would have to approve it. She noted that it money is taken out for t~avel, it will be taken out ot the district that is paying to have this d?ne to begin with, noting that she feels that all advisory boards should have the aame stipulation so that if there is a need, the Board can approve :.t. She stated that she has no problem with inserting the word "prior". Commissioner Pistor stated that it this clause is going to b~ left in, then there should be a provieion that w~uld ~~~icate that each year, the District budget would have an accnunt set 1I!; for travel. Page 7 - - .. ""-....--..........,. ~,.. . September 23, 1986 Cler~ Giles stated that he does not feel that it i. necsssary to include any provision regarding the budget, because when an item comes betore the Board tor approval, the Board will ask prior to approving it, it the money is in the budget. Co..issioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried 4/0, that the pUblic hearing be closed. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carrisd 4/0, that the Ordinance ae numbered and entitled below be adopted and entered into Ordinance Book No. 24: ORDINANCE 86-65 AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE IMMOKALEE LIGHTING AND BEAUTIPICATION DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE: PROVIDING POR APPOINTMENT AND COMPOSITION: SETTING FOR~H THE TERMS OF OFPICE: PROVIDING FOR REMOVAL FROM OPFICE. FAILURE TO ATTEND MEETINGS: PROVIDING FOR OFFICERS. QUORUM, RULES OF PROCEDURE: PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES: SETTING PORTH THE PUNCTIONS, POHERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMITTEE: SETTING PORTH THE DUTIES OF THE PUBLIC HORKS ADMINISTRATOR: PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY: PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Commissioner Ooodnight moved, seconded by Commissioner Voss and carried 4/0, that Resolution 86-177 appointing Rita Avalos; Resolution 88-178 appointing Stephen P. Gillaspis; Resolution 88-17~ appointing Plorsnce Jelks: Resolution 86-180 appointing Marjorie Ball¡ and Resolution 86-181 appointing Sam R. Lee, Jr. to the I..okal~. Lighting and Beautification District Advisory Committes be adopted. - .. BOOK 097 p~'-l536 Page 8 .. . ¡ , .".~,--"--,,,. September 23, 1986 It.. .5 ORDIRANC! 86-86 ESTA8LISHING UNIFORM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES HITHIR THI COORTY HATER-SEWER DISTRICT - ADOPTED AS AMENDED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on August 27, 1986, as evidenced by Atfidavit of Publicat~on tiled with the Clerk, pUblic hearing was opene~ to consid~r an ordinance establishing unitorm system developme~t charges within the County Hater-Sewer District. U~ilities Administrator Crandall stated that sewer system develop- ment charges were established in 1978 tor Sewer Area "A", adding that Sewer Areas "C" and "D" wers set up in 1984 and Sewer Area "B" in 1988. He stated that water system development charges were adopted uniformly through the District. He indicate~ that his objective with this ordinance is to establish unitorm system development charges, both water and sewer, at a reasonable hut adequate level. He stated that combining districts improves the tinancing capability, allo~3 for planning without artiticial boundaries, including building plant8 large enough to be economical, and allows tor maintenance crews to cross boundary lines without having to keep separate accounting records tor each sewer district. He stated that the mastftr planning etforts have lead to outlining capital needs and system development charges will help to ottset the cost, thereby reducing the a~ount needed to bor~w which helps create a pay-as-go atmoe,here. He stated that atter the forthcomiñg presentation, he will ask th.t the aoOK 097 PAr,t 542 Page 9 .. : ! · aOK 097 PA"t 543 September 23, 1986 proposed ordinance be adopted with the following amendment as recom- mended by the County Attorney's ottice that Page 3, te~tion One, Paragraph "B" read as tollows: "Hhenevel'- such person applies tor a .. building permit to alter or construct a structure which wi!l ··be con- nected to a water system and/or sewer system owned or operated by the County under Phases 1, 2 or 3 ot the County's Master Hater and Sewer Plan., even though such person may receive interim water and/or interim sewer service trom a source other than the County. Copies ot the service area maps trom the County's Master Hater and Sewer Plans are attached hereto and incorporated by reterence herein as tollows: Exhibit 1 - South Service Area Sewer Master Plan; Exhibit 2 - County Water Master Plan." Mr. Tom Taylor of Hole, Montes a Associates, stated that they developed the water and sewer master plans tor Collier County and in those ettorts, there has been a lot ot time and ettort put forward in developing cost estimates tor the construction of the tacilities. He stated that Collier County is behind on their efforts, but are trying to catch up and in order to continue to catch up, tunds need to be provided to construct and implement the plans and operate the system. He stated that the major components ot this is the establishment ot a system development charge that is consistent with the cost estimates that have been developed in the master planning. He stated that the cost estimates were prepared trom the 201 Facilities Plan which were based on gunerally accepted engineering practices and accepteG ~¿ the Page 10 - - - ~------- · ,. September 23, 1986 DER in the 201 planning etforts. He stated that the CUGtom~r growth projections were based on County and other data that was collected inclutl1ng the University ot Plorida Bureau ot Business and Economic Research. He noted that the concept ot the system development charges is to proceed into a growth-pays-tor-growth type scheme. He indicated that the cost in developing the actual level ot these fees was deter- mined by establishing a cost per gallon tor treatment and disposal which has been applied to an equivalent dwelling unit. He stated that the cost tor collection and transmission ot that waste water to the treatment tacility site was also estimated and included an estimate ot engineering and contingencies and then an eqUivalent dwelling un'c was applied to that cost. He noted that system development charges ~hould be used two ditferent ways which is to pay for outstanding indebted- ness and to be applied to system expansions as they are required, adding that this will reduce the tuture bond issue sizes for the uti- lity systems. He stated that this will also assist in minimizing tuture rate increases as well. He stated that the basic recommen- dations are to abolish the sewer area boundaries that currently exist and to consolidate that into a single area and to adopt the proposed system development fee schedule so that it is uniform throughout the County Hater-š&wer District. He stated that a survey was pertormed with regards to tees in other areas around the State and Collier County is in line with what is being assessed throughout the S~ate. Tape .2 BaOK 097 pV.! 544 Page 11 .. ..,'~,~.~"""._-- ~____''''--._.._~..;..,''"'._,_.~'''".....''''.~~~,.,_'~.''.'''.,~,..''''"".._'i , ' . iOOÞ: 097 PAGt 545 September 23, 1986 There was general discussion regarding how people p.y tcr these system development charges if they have an existing unit, ~h1ch could be set up over a certain period ot time with an interest rate or payable all at one time, but is something_ that could be ~esolved when .. a number of un1ts come on 11ne which w111 be about two or ~~ee years. Assistant County Attorney Anderson stated that this is something that he needs to investigate and would like to bring back to the Board at a later date. In answer to Mr. Keschl, Mr. Crandall stated that it ths plant that 1s presently being used is phased out, and the sewage goes to the County plant, there is still a system developmont charge. Mr. Jim Kingsbury stated that as the owner ot the Naples RV Pe:ort he paid an impact tee tor sewer and water two years ago, noting that he is not opposed to any of the tees. He stated that it was his understanding that he would ße served in about 3 to ð years, but he has since found out that it w111 be another 11 years before he gets service as he is outside the area that is now being planned. He stated that it is unreasonable tor the County to hold this money that long. He indicated that he is in Phase IV and what is being proposed is Phase I, II, and III. Mr. Crandall stated that the ordinance that is being proposed would allow tor any hook-ups that would be provided tor in the first ten years, which is Phase I, II, and III, adding that it anyone has paid and they are included in the tirst three phases, they can ~=~i- Page 12 .! - - .. ,._~-,---"._.._._~,. r~"-"""'"' ..".".."~..;_.,"--"..~._"".,-",.,~,~"-,,,",-,,,,--'- September 23, 1936 tion the Board ot County Commissioners tor. refund ot thosu t.es. Hs stat.d that h. would check into the matter with Mr. King~~ury. Mr. Mike Zewalk question.d how. tamily can be charged for .n additional bath, adding that p.ople will not build a home with one bath a. it i. not a saleable item. Commissioner Voss stated that it there is not an additional charge tor an extra bath. it only means that those people that h.ve only one bath would have to pay more because all tees would have to be incr....d to cover the cost ot the plant. He stated that the plant has to b. built and tinanc.d by these charg.s. Mr. Chester Dob.ck stat.d that the rate structure should be tied into the amount of water that is used, but h. disagre.s with the pre- vious conversation with regards to the hook-up t.e just because th.re is only one pip. coming out ot the hous.. Commission.r Voss moved. seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and c.rried 4/0, that the public hearing be clossd. Commissioner Pistor .tated that the matter ot one bath or two baths could be investigated to d.termine wh.t ths outcome would be as tar as tees .re concerned and report b.ck to the Board at . later d.te. Commi..ioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and c.rried 4/0. that the Ordinance .s numbersd and entitled below be .dopted and a~~end.d by the County Attorney's office and entered into Ordinance Book '24: ORDINANCE 86-66 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO HATER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES AND SEHER JYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES HITHIN THE COLLIER &001: 097 P~',: 546 Page 13 . , I, ..,--'""''''...--....--......''.<.. · aOk 097 PAGl54 7 September 23, 1986 COUNTY HATER-SEWER DISTRICT: PROVIDING FOR APPLICATION OP THE ORDINANCE AND SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES: ESTABLISMIlJO ~YSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES AS POLLOHS: ~ METER SIZE MINIMUM SYSTEM (inches) EQUIVALENT DEVELOPMENT UNITS PER CHARGE .. METER SIZE - 5/8 1 $ 700":00 3/4 1 700.00 1 2.11 1,7110.00 1-1/4 4 2,800.00 1-1/2 5 3,500.00 2 10 7,000.00 3 20 14,000.00 4 30 21,000.00 6 100 70,000.00 8 175 122,ðOO.00 10 27ð 192,500.00 12 475 332,500.00 ll.Yß RESIDENTIAL: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENCES, APARTMENT RESIDENCES, MOBILE HOME RESIDENCES: HITH 1 BATH~ (225 GALS/DAY/UNIT)..........................$ EACH ADDITIONAL BATH PER RESIDENCE, (50 GALS/DAy/UNIT)........................... NONRESIDENTIAL: HOTEL, MOTEL, AND TRAILER RENTAL UNITS, ( 11 0 GALS/DAY /UNI~) . . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . .. . COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL TOILET UNITS (NOT TO INCLUDE INDUSTRIAL HASTE), (400 GALS/DAy/TOILET)........:............... COMMERCIAL COIN LAUNDRY HATER UNITS, (200 GALS/DAY/HASHER)............ ........... RESTAURANT AND LOUNGE SEATING UNITS, (315 GALS/DAy/SEAT)........................... SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 9150.00 210.00 46ð.00 1,685.00 8'5.00 150.00 PROVIDING POR THE PURPOSE OP SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES AND LIMITATIONS ON EXPENDITURES AND REFUNDS OP SAME, REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS. 78-11, 80-94, 82-34 AND SECTION THREE OF ORDINANCE ~O. 86-35 WHICH RELATED TO HATER SYSTfMS Page ,1' ~", - - .. ..-._-_._.,..,..",._...~"._"""...,--~,,_......._-~- September 23, 1986 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES; REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS. 78-2.2, 81-17, 84-36, 84-68, 84-77 AND SECTION THREE OP ORDINANCE NO. 86-35 WHICH RELATED TO SEHER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES: PROVIDING POR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE ~^TE. Ite. #7 ORDINANCE 86-67 ESTABLISHING RATES AND DEPOSITS, ANn CONSOLIDATING RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE COLLIER COUNTY MATER/SEW!R DISTRICT _ ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on September 4. 1986, as evidenced by Affidavit ot Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider the adoption ot an ordinance establishing rates and deposits, and consolidating rules and regulations tor the Colljer County Hater/Sewer District. Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that this item deal. with . water and sewer user fees and rules and regulations which relate to deposits, turn-ons and turn-otts. He stated that there wers no major revisions in the rules and regulations except tor a change in ths sewer deposit. He stated that the recommendation on the rate changes is in accordance with the rate analyst, Coopers a Lybrand that were hired to do the rate study. He stated that the records indicate that no rate study has been pertormed in the past, which lett uncertainty in the ability to meet all the debt service and O&M. He stated that the rate study recommends a restructuring ot the charges with a demand charge tor d~~ service and a per thousand gallon charge for O&M which .. will allow Statt'to project theëttects on capital projects. He stated that once t~e rate structure is put into effect, he will know aOOK 097 PA~,l 548 Page 15 .. ~ ~ , . . ,oo~ 097 PAGt 549 September 23, 1986 the exact ettects ot new debt that might bs proposed fo~ capital pro- jects. M'" Paul Comislr:ey, Manager of Coopers and Lybrand, st..t.~ that ths scope of the worlr: was to pertorm a user rate study tor fiscal year 1987, excluding the areas ot Marco Island and Goodland. H1I stated - that the work also excludes an analysis ot the system development fees in as Much as these were handled by the firm of Hole, Montes & Associates. He stated that they are recommending a unitorm rate tor water and .ewer as it i. one comprehensivs system. He stated that thers will be a 27~ shorttall in revenuss it the rates are not changed. He indicated that about 18~ of the customers are provi~ed water only and 7' are provided sewer only and the sewer customer. are not metered and, because of that, there is a need to have a tlat rate tor sewer service. as opposed to a billing based on water consumption. He stated that the bond covenants on the debt issues tor the utility operations are quite onerous and because ot thi., it eliminate. a lot of the tlexibility that a utility would usually have in setting their Tape .3 rates. He stdted that currently there'is no excess capacity in the system, adding that any additional capacity would have to be built. He stated that with regard. to bond covenants, there are basically two of them: one is that user rates, plu. system development tees, interest, tapping tees, must equal 125~ of bond service or annual debt .ervice. He stated that atter the payment of O&M and atter the Page 16 - - - .-.."..---- #"-,,";",,,,,--,,,,._.,.,,~,...<~,-,,~..,,,"~,.,_.,._._",........-._- · .~. September 23, 1996 payment at debt, there has to be another 25' ot the debt service amounts available. He st.ted that the .econd covenant i. that the user rates, exclusive ot the .yste. development tee., have to cover 100' ot the annual debt .ervic.. He .t.ted th.t b".ed on his pro- ject., the 12ð' tirst bond covenant can be easily met with the level of system dovelopment tee. that are proposed, but the oecond coven.nt is the onerous covenant, adding that as new debt is added to the .y.te. that annual debt carry has to be covered by the user r.tes. H. st.ted that with the utility sy.te. .t full capacity, there i~ . need tor addition.l debt issue., adding th.t one i. planned in 1987, which cau.es the r.t. incr..s. this year. M~. Comiskey ..id th.t the bond covenant may require addition.l increases in the tuture and th.t the objectives are to meet the bond covenant. by setting the rates at a required level, to recover OaK costs equitably between the user groups, to recover capacity coat trom customers that require the capacity, to have r.tes .dministratively efficient to handle, .nd to eli8inate charit.ble and non-protit allowances. Also, the current methodology is th.t a cu.tom.r is billed a minimum charge b.sed on .n a.sumed 3,000 gallons ot usage per month and in comparing that to the objectives, there was no direct relationship, and bec.use of that an .lternative ~~e methodology was suggested that i. called the cap.- city commodity method ot rate dësign. He stated that this me~~od works by determining the c.pacity co.t and then divided propor- tion.tely among the customers and a monthly capacit7 ch.rge is levied eOOK 097 PAGl550 Page 17 .. ""'",_........."",..,.."'''''.'''"''M,."''''"'"..,,,,.,,'.',,_..,,''''......,.."_",~_>o_ , , . aDD( 097 PAGl551 September 23. 1~86 which is designed to cover the annual debt service c~rry. rhe com- modity portion ot the rates recovers the other coats, he .~Jd, which is based on a tunction ot actual usage, adding that this methodology relates to water only where there is a m~tsr to determine usage. He noted that the sewer rates will continus to be a flat rat...~d that ths rats calculation was determined from the County budget as well aa determining an amount ot cost to bs recovered. He stated that in detsrmining the capacity charge, this is divided by the number ot equivalent dwelling units which is based on the one bath concept. He noted that the consumption rate on water would be the O&M costs which tluctuate based on consumption divided by the estimated consumption tor next year which equals last year's consumption plus an assumed 7' growth rate. He stated that the flat rate for sewer is all sewer coats divided by the eewer equivalent dwelling units. He noted that the overall impact to the average customer that uses between 9,000 and 12,000 gallons ot water per month would have about a 20' rate increase. He stated that in his analysis the water rates increase and the sewer rates decrease, adding that the reason is that rate increases have been passed based on a flat ð' or 6' to all customers in the past which means that the cost of providing water has exceeded the cost ot .ewer. He stated that the primary reason tor the increase in the average rate to the customer is the new debt ti5~vice that will come on line this year. adding that other things that tend to reduce the impact to the average customer is the rate methodology Page 18 - - - --.---.-....-------.---- - ._",-,.".,""-",".-".~"-.,-"-",...",-".."",._.",,-,,,-_...,,.,-~~,'.'---- S.ptember 23, 1986 that he has propos.d, which is the capacity commodity mothod. He .tated that wh.n revi.wing the billing records, it wa~ taund that th.re were an increase in the numb.r ot comm.rcial EDU's wt.!ch also reduced the impact to the average customer. He noted that by elimi- nating the allowances, this has also had a reduction on the impact at the av.rage customer. H. stated that as part ot his report. he made some recommendations, which would b. to eliminate some ot the onerous bond covenants, to look tor .arly d.bt retirem.nt. to us. some of the .yst.m development tees to tinance the pl.nt and l..s.n the need tn go into the bond market. He stated that he would r.commend incr.asing the amount ot additional EDU's th.t .re available from commercial customers and he would recommend that the utility prepare a tinancial model that would be a quick way ot .ss.s.ing the impact on cu.tomer rat.s tor tuture expansion and oth.r action that the utility propo- e... Mr, Mike McNe.s, Utiliti.s Administration Director, .tated that the rates that are advertis.d are not the rates that Coopers a Lybrand has recommended in th.ir rate study, adding that the .ewer rates were not changed. but the Board of County Commissioner. has the opportunity to adopt the rates as they pres.ntly are or to adopt the rates of Coopers & Lybrand, which is a ð' decrease. H. noted that - 0- there is one change in the ..w.~rat.s that has b.en mad. in the adv.rtising which is in the .econd bath tor the comm.rcial clae~ifi- cation. He stated that certain assumptions were made to the number aOOK 097 P~~,l 552 Page 19 .. . , . ' . .. 097 ,~t;t 553 Septemb.r 23, 1986 ot gallons ot sewage that each ot the units produce within n day, and the ~~sumptions that are used in the current rat. .chedul~ Kre dit- terent than the assumptions that were used to figure the s.m. charges in the system, development ordinance. He Atated th.t th.....umptions have now been made consistent and that has cr.ated some miñår changes in those units. He stated that the only .igniticant change is the s.cond bath on the re.idential .ingle-tamily home which would ch.nge from $1.37 to $2.22 which i. to retlect the g.llon per day .ssump.ion that was used to determine the impact tee. H. stated that as t6r as the current customers, the unit that has zero usage tor water with on. bath would have a 25~ increase and the unit that has two baths would have a 30~ increase. He noted that the aver.ge user would have . 20' incre.se, adding that the higher the us.ge, the lower the per- cent increase. He noted that the .ewer rates of Collier County com- pare very fa~~rable with other sewer rates in the area, .dding that Colli.r County is the third lowest ot the seven that were rese.rched. He st.ted that in Collier County the c.pacity charge tor water ot $13.9' is the highest ot the utilities ,th.t were surveyed .nd the consumption charge ot $1.24 per 1,000 is the second lowe.t in the .re., .dding that when they .re put together, the County compare. very tavorably with the other utilitie.. Mr. George Keller stated that there is debt service in the tees as well .s the system development tees, .tating that the sy.t.m develop- ment charges should be able to carry the bond indeb,edness .nd then it should not be figured into the users tees. Page 20 - - .. ,_.._.;,.,""'''''''._"......._.<"'.."......,~'*....'''K_;_''''.,~__..".....,.--"'.._~ September 23, 1986 Mr. Zewalk stated that he still disagrees with th~ chargo tor the sxtra bath, as there is only one outlet coming out. lie 8tated that peopls should not be penalized for convenience. Mr. McNees stated that national industry standards indicate that a home with two baths uses titty gallons per day mors sewags than the average home w1th one bathroom, and this is what thsy are going by to allocate the coet. Mr. Crandall stated that generally speaking if there Is more bathrooms, there are more people in the household, addIng that this 1s not necessar1ly the tacts. Tape ., Co..ls.loner Voss .oved, .econded by Co.-Issloner B.... and carrled '/0, that the public hearIng be clo.~d. Co..iesioner Voss moved, seconded by Co.-issioner Goodnight and c.rried 4/0, that the Ordinance a. numbsred and sntitled below be adopted and e.:tered into Ordinance Book No.2': ORDINANCE 86-67 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING MONTHLY RATES, PEES AND CHARGES FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE IN THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT AS POLLOHS: A. HATER (1) FLAT RATE-AVAILABILITY CHARGE (a) SINGLE PAMILY RESIDENCE (b) MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE: DUPLEX RESIDENCE RENTAL APARTMENTS OR CONDOMINIUMS '",£.c) BUSINESS AND INSTITUTIONS (2) HATER USAGE - ALL CLASSES OF SERVICE $13.9'/UNIT $27.88/UNIT $13. 94/UNIT $13.94 $ l.U/I000 GALLONS OP PART THF.REOP BOOK 097 PAGE 554 Page 21 . . ¡ . ,...."".._.'.._""".--..,'_"'"'."'"".,,".,,."'..,_'~,>,"'.....<_=·,".N.__~""__ . ' . IOU 097 mt 555 September 23, ¡986 B. SEHER (1) RESIDENTIAL (a) SINGLE PAMILY RESIDENCE, MULTI-PAMILY RESIDENCES, APARTMENT RESIDENCES, MOBILE HOME RESIDENCES: EACH ONE BATH LIVING UNIT $ 9.98 EACH ADDITIONAL BATH PER LIVING UNIT $ 2. ~ (2) NON-RESIDENTIAL EACH PACILITY SHALL BE BILLED BASED UPON THE TOTAL or THE POLLOWING UNITS CONTAINED THEREIN. (a) HOTEL. MOTEL AND TRAILER RENTAL UNITS: EACH UNIT $ 4.88 (b) COMMERCIAL, OFPICE, INSTITUTIONAL AND INDUSTRIAL TOILET UNITS (NOT TO INCLUDE INDUSTRIAL HASTE): EACH TOILET UNIT $17.74 (c) COMMERCIAL AND COIN LAUNDRY HASHER UNITS: EACH HASHER UNIT $ 8.87 (d) RESTAURANT AND LOUNGE SEATING UNITS: EACH SEATING UNIT $ 1.55 PROVIDING DEFINITIONS: PROVIDING FOR APPLICATION FOR SERVICE: PROVIDINr POR LIMITATION OF USE AND CONTINUITY OF SERVICE: PROVIDING METER TAPPING CHARGES; PROVIDING CUSTOMER'S LIABILITY POR DAMAGE TO EQUIPMENT: PROVIDING HATER DEPOSITS: PROVIDING SEHER DEPOSITS: PROVIDING OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY POR WATER SERVICE AND BAD DEBTS: PROVIDING DATES BILLS DUE AND DELINQUENT. DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE FOR NON PAYMENT, REINSTATEMENT FOLLOWING DISCONTINUED SERVICE: PROVIDING PAYMENT WHEN METER BECOMES DEPECTIVE, RIGHT OF ENTRY OF AUTHORIZED AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES: PROVIDING WATER BILL COMPLAINTS; PROVIDING EACH RESIDENCE AND PLACE or BUSINESS CONSIDERED SEPARATE SERVICE: PROVIDING METERS, LOCATION AND CHARGE FOR MOVING: PROVIDING INACTIVE ACCOUNTS, NOTICE, PORFEITURE OF DEPOSIT: PROVIDING COLLECTION or WATER AND SEWER UTILITY BILLS, DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE: PROVIDING HYDRANT SERVICE: PROVIDING CONNECTIONS HITH HATER AND SEHER REQUIRED: PROVIDING EXCEPTIONS TO CONNECTIONS: PROVIDING CONNECTIONS MAY BE MADE BY COUNTY: PROHIBITING UNLAWFUL CONNECTIONS: PROVIDING FAILURE TO MAINTAIN PLUMBING SYSTEM: PROVIDING UNPAID PEES TO CONSTITUTE LIEN: PROVIDING NO PREE SERVICE: PROVIDING SEPARATE CONNECTIONS POR EACH SEPARATE UNIT: REPEAL!NG ORDINANCE NOS. 86-35, 85-82, 85-59, 85-50, 85-48, 82-65, 78-9, 77-30, and 77-5 WHICH REhATED TO ~JNTHLY HATER AND SEHER RATES, FEES AND CHARGES: PROVIDING poa CONPLICT AND SEVERABILIT~: PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. - - - Page 22 "--,......"'_.."",'-,.,',..._".....---,~,.---_.--.- September 23, 1~86 ..... Rscsss: 10:35 A.M. - Reconvsnsd: 10:'6 A.M. ..... Ite. .8 ORDIKARCK PROHIBITIKG DRIRXIKQ OR COKSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES :K A PUBLIC OR SEMI-PUBLIC PARXIKG LOT, BEACH OR BEACH ACCESS AREA - DDlED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on September 4, 1986, as evidenced by Attidavit ot Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider a proposed ordinance making it unlawtul for any pereon to consume any alcoholic bever~Jp. or to possess any unsealed or open container of alcoholic bever~g~ while on or within any public or semi-public parking lot, public beach, or pUblic beach access area except when such person is attending an event sponsored by Collier Coun~y or by civic, non- profit or charitable organizations. Assistant County Attorney Mourick stated that he was directed by the Commission to dratt an ordinance ot this type, adding that as this is dratted it would cover the unincorporated beaches of Collier County, but it would not include the beaches in Naples. Hs noted that Collier County current prohibits alcoholic beverages trom County parks and this would extend the prohibition to the public beaches, the semi-public beaches, parking lots, and semi-public parking lots. He stated that he answered questions during the past week from Condominium Ar~ociation. as to whether this ordinance would a~ply to their parking lot, adding that under the detinition ot semi-parking lots, he would have to say that it would prohibit alcoholic beverages eODK 097 PAr,L 556 Page 23 .. . ! ; f ..;~.,..,.____",<......___",...... ... ".__..,..-..". _"0_' .,<" ___........~_"~,_.."."'~.~._-,,~.~,.-...,~....-... ;; 097 PAr,! 557 September 23, !986 fro. those parking lots. He stated that there is an e~~mpt~on in the ordinance that indicates that the ordinance shall not a~pJy to any person attending any tunction, testival, ór event which is.. sponsored - by Collier County, or by civic, non-profit or charitable organiza- tions, adding that the word "public" is proposed to be added in tront of the word "tunction". He stated that there has been discussion regarding requiring a permit, aðding that in the ordinance there would have to be a provision made tor a permit tor the consumption of alcoholic beverages. He noted that another exemption would be to: people picking up trash or beer cans tram along side the road or parking lots. He stated that under Section 3, Detinitions, he would propose addiI.J Subsection "C" to define a public beach which shall mean any beach within the un~ncorporated area of Collier County which ie: (1) Below the mean high water lines, (2) is owned by Collier County, or (3) has arisen upon it. a public easement prescriptive or otherwise, or (4) is the foreshore ot title navigable waters, which is the land between the high and low water marks and is owned by the State ot Plorida. Deputy Chief Barnett stated that his department has a lot of problems with entorcing an ordinance ot this nature when the detini- tions are not clear. adding that the cost ot entorcement is extremely high. He stated that once an ordinance like this is passed, r!:nt have neighbors calling in on neighbors and he does not see how this ordi- nance is going to benetit Collier County. He state~ that the Country Page 24 - - - ~..,'--'""..-_...._' September 23, '986 Clubs would not be allowed to havs their drinks in the parking lot or carry one through the parking lot to the pool area. Re stat~d that he is not sure what a semi-parking lot .eans, adding that parking lots ars either privately owned or publicly owned. Commissioner Voss questioned it this ordinance would help Tigertail Beach, to which Deputy Chiet Barnett stated that the problem at Tigertail is not the drinking, but the lack ot places to park. He stated that Tigertail is a very crowded park and maybe a fee could be charged to use the park and then use the money to get extra parking. Rs stated that there are enough state laws and ordinances for obnoxious behavior tor people without adding anymore. Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that there is already an ordinance that prohibits drinking alcohol at a County park and in that case, Tigertail is considered a County park even though it is a public beach. Commissioner Hasse stated that he does not go along with this ordinance noting that it is doing away with a little bit ot the American way of life. The following people epoke against the proposed ordinance citing the tact that Collier County would be losing tourist trade it this ordinance is passed; it would cost the taxpayers extra money to entorce this law and put up signs: it would punish the law-abiding citizen that I"~joys a sociable drink: it would not be a benefit to the residents of Collier County: !OO( 097 p~r,t 558 Page 215 . : ~ ,~,,,, "",...."',~""'"_..,.,""".,""..- .,.,....... .~, .'-, ...._.-" .".~.,"...".,,"-~~,,"-,~.,,-_.._., , . . ' . toO( 097 PAGl559 Septsmber 23, 1986 Karen Nell Richard Pitts John Iamurri, ,Jr. Patrick Kavan~ugh Mr. Mike Zewalk statad that the North Naples Civic Aseociation is in tavor of the ordinance as they teel i~will be 4 benefit to the ... - residents ot Collier County. Co..issioner Voss aoved, ssconded by Commissionsr Goodnight and carried 4/0, that the public hsaring be closed. Commissioner Goodnight stated that she has a problem with the pr.o- posed ordina..ce as it would be very ditticul t to entorce such an C'rdi- nance, adding that she does not teel that anyone should bs able to tell anybody where they can drink. Coaaissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Basse and carried 4/0, that the proposed ordinance regarding alcoholic beverages be denisd. Itea .9 RESOLUTION 8G-182 ENTERING INTO AGREEMENT WITH ~ENNlTH BARTON REPRESENTING THE PETERSON GROUP OP NAPLES RI MITIGATION FOR OWPDMI'l'T!D TREE REMOVAL - APPROVED Natural Resources Management Director Proftitt stated that this item was continued trom last week's meeting because there were questions as to why only one tree was being accepted tor mitigation when more were were cut and why there was no 8urvival clause in the area. He stated that the survival clause was a staft oversite and has since been put into the agreement. Tape #5 Page 26 - - - September 23, 1986 Dr. Prottitt stated that in this particular case, it seeae4 teasible to plant a tree at a park site, but the small seo~11ngs that have been previously required on a basis at one to one were inappropriate at a park site because ot the heavy toll children and dogs would have on the seedlings, thus, a larger tree was obviously required. He stated that the cost would be about $10 tor the small seedlings, plus the labor, and the cost ot approximately a 10 foot tall oak tree, which is what he proposes to plant, ie about $75-1C~. plus labor. He stated that he telt that it would be untair to ha~- him plant 10 of those trees at such a cost. He stated that in the tirst test ot the tree enforcement, education is mors important than . retribution and is in line with general policy of being easy on first time otfenders when there are only a tew trees involved. He stated that the new vegetation ordinance that will be coming torward in about a month or two will be stricter. He stated that he i. asking for ratification ot ths present contract. Commissioner Hasse stated that he does not understand why only one tree is being replaced, when there were a number of trees taken down and he does not understand why this tree is being put in Caxambas Park. Dr. Prof~~t stated that it is impossible to replace a 10 inch .. diameter pine tree as they have~o grow trom seedlings. He st.~~~d that the Parks & Recreation Department requested that this tree be put at Cax&:llbas Park. He indicated that most of thl- mitigation in &OOK 097 PAr,l560 Page 27 .. --,--_.._-_.,.""""'....~."~"''',._.~.._.,."~.,.,''""~-~.,,.,''''..---- 'OD( 091 PAGL 561 . September 23, 1986 ths futurs will either be done on-sits or places like Corkscrew Sanctuary where the trees can be used to re-establish true habitat. In answer to Commissionsr Hasse, Ms. Muldoon ot the Natural Resources Management Department, indicated that these trees were cut down on the property ot the Old Swamp Bug~ Grounds on R~dio Road. Mr. Mike Zewalk stated that he i. concerned about the ;'~oval ot good trees, adding that an ordinance was passed in the 70's to protect any tree over 4 inches in diameter. He noted that a new ordinance is not needed, adding that the ordinance that exists simply needs to bs enforced. Commissioner Voss questioned it this developer would have been allowed to cut these trees down it he had come in for a tres removal permit, to which Dr. Prottitt replied affirmatively. Co..is.ioner Voss moved, seconded by Co..issioner Goodnight and carried 3/1, (Co..issioner Basse opposed), that R~solution 86-182 entering into an agreemsnt with ~enneth Barton reprsssnting ths Peterson Group of Naples re mitigation tor unpermitted tree rsmoval be adopted. Page 28 - - - --,--_...,,-.._---,._--,--_._,-_....... 'OOK 097 PIGl567 September 23, 1986 Ite. .10 RESOLUTION 86-183 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT POR DEVELOPMENT OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION PROGRAM AHD CHAIRMAN AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE CONTRACT eM-169 AND APPROVED EXECUTION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND DR. ROBERT R. GORE, MS. MAORA E. CURRAN, MS. LINDA S. HEINLAND. AND MS. DONNA J. DEVLIN - ADOPTED Dr. Prottitt stated that the Natural Resource Managem~ Department has had a continuous series at one year grants from the PD!R which has allowed the NRMD to gather an enormous amount ot data and to make recommendations that have been exceedingly usetul in such matters as land use decisions, land planning and beach erosion. He stated that it will also be valuable in the State Mandated Growth Management and Comprehensive Plan moditications that will bs occurring over the next couple ot years. He stated that in the first year, the Natural Resources Management Department compiled all available data on Collier County beaches and protiled erosion history back as tar as 189~, adding that the report trom this work has been widely cited and used. He stated that in subsequent years, data on natural habitats and land ownerships was gathered and recommen- dations were made regarding what land uses would be ecologically com- patible with ths habitats. He stated that in the upcoming fiscal year. he will use the grant to tinish up the land use data-metrics tor the remainder of the County and begin a survey ot the state ot health ot the Gollier County estuaries and associated tisheries. He stated that when the survey begins, his department will assist the PDNR, Division ot Marine Research, in their work in the wetland and Page 29 .. .. .. .."'._..._......~.,,'-,.<._._-_.~....,.......,,"""'-""-"-- Sept.mber 23, 1986 .e.gr..s areas. He .tated that the County will also .ssist another branch of the DNR with their biologic.l as.essment that is nece.sary for the man.gement plan tor the Ten Thousand Island aquatic preserve. He stated that early this year, he requested .nd received $50,000 fro. the State and will match this with $8,9ðO tram the Reef .nd M.rine Fund. He stated that Statt reéommends that the Board of County Commissioners ratify the contract with the PDER .nd the asso- ci.t.d employment contracts. Co..i..ioner Voss moved, s.cond.d by Commission.r H.... and carried 4/0, th.t Resolution 86-183 approving an .greement tor dev.- lopa.nt of R.sourc. Man.gem.nt and prot.ction progr_ and Ch.i~an .uthorized to .xecute contr.ct CM-169 and .pprov. .xecution ot .aploym.nt .gr.e.ent. b.tween Colli.r County and Dr. Rob.rt H. Gor., Ms. M.ur. E. CUrran, Ms. Linda S. H.inland, and M.. Donn. 3. Devlin b. adopt.d. ~ .. BOOK 097 PA'-! 568 P.ge 30 .. Septs.ber 23, 1986 It.. .11 CHAIRMAN AUTHORIZED TO SIGN A SUPPORTING LETTER RATIFYING AM AMENDMENT LETTER 1'0 DCA RELATIVE TO THE APPLICATION FOR ENTERPRISE ZONES AND STArr AUTHORIZED TO FORWARD SAID LETTER - APPROVED Handa Jones, Housing Programs Director, stated that this is a request to ratity an amendment letter which was torwarded to the DCA relative to the applications ot the Enterprise Zone designations and authorizing the Chairman to sign a supporting letter of that amendment lettsr and authorizing Statt to then torward the supporting letter to DCA. She stated that on September 9, 1986, the Board approved an application for the designation ot two Enterp.rise Zones in Collier County and upon DCA's receipt of that application, it was found that the County was eligible to apply for only one Enterprise Zone and that was due to the fact that under Florida Statute 125.001, the County did not qualify tor two Enterprise Zones, but only one which has to do with the Home Rule definition. She stated that at that time, the deadline was September 15, 1986, and a letter was sent requesting that the application be amended to include the Immokalee zone and not the Naples Manor zone because it was determined in the population category of Immokalee, there were only 3 applications and in the ca~~ory that Naples Manor would come under, there were , - 225 application~ that had been received. She stated that the chances tor having an Enterprise Zone designated for the Immokalee area were very good. She noted that at the Qeadline. there were a total of 6 &01)( 097 W,: 614 Page 31 .. .-,«..,,,,..-._-~,.,,,..,,._, . ' . 100« 097 n':.! 615 September 23, 1986 applications received including Collier County's under the same cate- gory as Immokalee. She stated that 6 Enterprise Zones will be designated within each ot the population~ategor1eR, so it~ appears at ... this time, that the Immokalee zone would be approved as the ,. Enterprise Zone. Commissi~ner Pi.tor questioned if Collier County is a Home Ruls County or not, to which County Attorney Cuyler stated that there are two types of Counties: Charter Home Rule County, and the other county operates under the general Statute, Chapter 125. He stated that, theretore, Collier County, is not a Charter Home Rule County. Co..issioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commis.ioner Voss and carried 4/0, that the Chairman be authorized to sign a supporting letter ratifying an amendment letter to DCA relative to the applica- tion tor Enterpri.e Zone. and that Statf be authorized to torward .aid letter. In answer to Commissioner Hasse. Ms. Jones stated that at this time Naples Manor will not be designated as an Enterprise Zone, but CDBG tunds can still be used tor Naples Manor and other area. in the County. Mr. Zewall~ questioned if the taxpayers are going to be paying tor this, to which Ms. Jones stated that this is designation that will allow developers within the areas to receive tax credits and credits on eales tax it they develop, redevelop and revitalize these areas. She stated that ~hen neighborhoods are deteriorated or deteriorating, Page 32 .. - .. ---,_..~.._-".."~.....<......,._..,,,..;,;,",.,,,,~.,,_.+_.,,-._,, September 23, 1986 they retlect on the total County and the total image ot the County and, theretore, an attempt to revitalize these area. or to develop an economic base becomes important to the overall County in terms ot the tax dollars that can then be brought back into the County due to revitalizing. Ite. .12 DRIVB-TBRO WINDOW FOR TRK BUILDING DEPARTMENT (BUILDING G FOR APPROXIMA'l'ELY '15.000 - APPROVED ~uilding Code Compliance Director Magri stated that he is requesting approval ot a drive-thru window tor the ~uilding Department as hs is constantly seeking methods for improving service to the community. He stated that he believes that a drive-thru window would not only enhance the department but would increase the etticiency. as well as being a great accommodation for the builders and developers who visit the Building Department frequently to drop oft plans or pick up permits. He noted that the window installation will also help minimize trattic in the BUilding Department as well as make it easier to obtain a building permit. He noted that it would cost approxima- tely $15,000 which would include a U-type driveway that would come oft Harrison Street, a canopy, window, speaker and alert bell system, as well as some minor alterations to the outside ot the building. He stated that ~~~y are going to try and minimize the cost by doing some in-house work on'it and possiblT the Road Department will put in the driveway. MOK U97 ~'.: 615 Page 33 .. . , ' _......,.........,."_..'<",~,,..'"."_O;.~,_"""__'""~"'___"'.,__ , . . .. 1011( 097 w.' fi17 Ssptember 23, 198& Clerk Giles questioned it this is going to be paid from the General Pund, to which County Manager Lusk stated that he would like to ask that it be used tram Contingency monies trolft the General Pund. Clerk Giles questioned it this wouldëome tram next ye,r's budget, - to which Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that it would depend on when the benefit is received. addi~g that it it is not done prior to the end ot the tiscal year. it would be a carryover iato the next fiscal year and would be an obligation of that budget. Tape .& C~ls.loner Goodnight moved, seconded by Co.-l.sloner Vo.. and carried 4/0, that the drive-thru window for the Building Department (Building G) for approximately 81&,000 be approved. Clerk Giles questioned if there would be any problem with the duål taxation agreement by using General Funds, to which Assistant County Manager Dorrill stated that the County Commission has an obligation to provide building and office space tor the various departments and he did not feel that it was justitied to use an enterprise tund of the Community Development Pund to build, what amounts to, flscal planned i.provements at the Government Center. It.. .13 FLBBT MANAGBM£NT BUDGBT AMENDMENT INCREASING CAPITAL EXPENDITURES BY $14&,962 FOR THB CONSTRDCTION AND RELOCATION OP reEL PACILITIES _ APPROVED Public Horks Administrator Archibald stated that this item is a follow-up to the approval of relocating the fuel pumps at the Page 34 .. .. .. <--,,~.,._.. --,,- .""'.."'..-.....~""""""="-~...,. September 23, 1986 Courthouse Complex, adding that this is a budget amendment approval that he is requesting simply to transfer funds to assure that the relocation ot the tuel pumps will be completed and to go ahead with tuture contracts at the Immokalee Road and Bridge eite and at the Naples Road ~ld Bridge site. Comaissioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commissioner Voss and carried ./0, that the Pleet Management Budget Amendment increasing capital expenditures by $1.6,962 for the construction and relocation of fuel facilitiss be approvsd. Ite. .u LEASE AGREEMBHT WITH CHARLES B. AND LINDA A. NICHOLAS FOR 1.& ACRES OF PROPERTY FOR $&00 A MOHTB ON ENTERPRISE AVERUK IM MAPLES PRODUCTIOM PARK POR THE NAPLES TRANSFER STATIOM - APPROVED Public Horks Administrator Archibald stated that this is a recom- mendation to approve a lease agreement tor the Naples Transter Station that was the direction ot the Board on August 26, 1986. He stated that the Real Property Department analyzed a number of dif- ferent eites to serve the purpose as a Naplss Transfer Station. He noted that at all the sites that were reviewed, one site was picked as bsing best in consideration ot the location, which is on Enterprise Avenue, directly opposite where the transter station turn oft is now and also the site was the proper size ot 1.5 acres. He stated that trr~ lease agreement has a lease amount per month of $500 which represents a substantial reduction over what is currently being paid. He stated that he is requesting that the lease agreement b. ~ODK 097~~-,: filS Page 35 .. . ! .....,._-'"_.,""'.._,-"'..,,"..,~,_._^.._~,~--..._'''_.-.- _. . . ..~... 097 n<:: fl19 lOGY. September 23, 1986 approved and executed, adding that thers is one important condition that is shown in the Lease that the Board should be aware ot. He noted that the lease makes a provision that the County will be pro- cessing a provisional use to get approval to use the industrial zoned sits tor the Naples Transter site which will take approxi~ely 3 to 4 months. He stated that it the provisional use is not approved for one reason or the other, then the lease would become null and void. Commissioner Hasse questioned it this will have an adverse ettect on the area. to which Mr. Archiba:d replied negatively, adding that the type of equipment that will be there i. the same type of equip- ment that is presently on the Courthouse Complex. Co..issioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Co..issioner Voss and carried 4/0, that the Lease Agreement with Charles E. and Linda A. Nichola. for 1.6 acres of property for $500 a month on Enterprise Avenue in Xaples Production Park tor the Maples Transter Station be approved. Page 36 .. - - "^·_q,....__.I.I>.W ..._--_....'...,'~"...,,;,,~,,",.,' Septembsr 23, 1986 Its. .15 AGREEMENT lOR PROPESSIONAL SERVICES HITH COASTAL BNGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. TO PERFORM A STUDY AND REPORT ON BEACH NOURISHMENT IN COLLIER COUNTY IN THE AMOUNT OP 8152.ðOO - APPROVED Public Works Administrator Archibald stated that this item involves looking at the report and cost ot a beach nourishment study, adding that there was an ad hoc committee that was established to review it and Harold Huber was on that committee. Mr. Huber stated that this item is to request approval of an agresment tor protessional services with Coastal Engineering Con- sultants, Inc. to pertorm a study and report on beach nourishment in Collisr County, and upon approval, to designate the tunding source tor same. He n~ted that on December 10, 1985, the Board directed the statt to request proposals from consulting firms to conduct a study tor beach nourishment in Collier County, and subsequently, as a result of presentations fro. those consultants, a short list was recommended by the Consultant Selection Committee on April 20, 1986. He stated that at that time the Board directed start to negotiate an agreement with Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. to perform said study and at the same time an ad hoc committee was appointed to determine the scope ot services to be included in the subject study. He stated th~t the ad hoc committee has completed their determination .... which was the ba~is tor negotia~ons relative to the agreement that is being presented this date. He indicated that the consultants indicated that the cost or the study would be between $75,000-100,000 800K 097~~!,:l)26 Page 37 .. . . ' ..._............ "~>o "'. __...........,,__,._~._,..""~'.,,~...~..'"'>"'M"""..,'~._"_"'"_...___ , . . lOOK 097.,-" 627 September 23, 1986 but that total did not include sand s.arch to d.t.rmine s.diment availability. He stated that with the sand search includ.d, the .gr....nt would be in the amount ot $lð2,ðOO and would also be the minimum services required to produce a repo!t and ~tudy th,t could b. - utiliz.d in implementing a successtul beach management plan. H. stated that Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. are adequately st.tf.d and qualified to perform the services specified und.r the Agreement. He indicated that there are three major categories in the scope of work; on. would b. . historical r.vi.w and gath.ring of all existing data that is available; two, would the tield work that is required: and thre., would the data analysis and r.port preparation. Be stated that in r.cent stat. legislation, the FDNR has be.n man- dated to pertorm certain studies r.lativ. to beach managem.nt under the n.w Beach Management Law and as such, the scope of services has be.n brok.n down into three components, adding that Component I is the items that the County would be liabls tor with regards to cost: Component II are items that would be duplicated in the study that DNR would have to make and they would be willing to enter into an agreement wher.by they would r.imburse the County tor the items that would be duplicated; and Component III is the item for the sand search which probably would .v.ntually be .ligibl. tor 100~ reimbursement from DNR. He indicated that he does not believe that this has b.en specifically budgeted for in the next tiscal year's budget, but atter talking with the Budg.t Director, it 1s being recommend.d that this Page 38 - - - September 23, 19B6 aoney come from either the General Fund or the Capital Improvement Fund where there are sutticient rsserve amounts to cover this expen- diture. Commissioner Pistor questioned if the sand search has to be done at this time, to which Mr. Huber stated that this item could be done at a later time but would be valuable information to include in the study. He stated that this study is more comprehensive than the State's study and within a year, Collier County would be ready for a specitic project and could request to be put on a priority list tor tunding. Commissioner Pistor questioned how long the sand search will take, to which Mr. Huber stated that it will take 4bout 3-1/2 to 4 months. Hr. Hilliam McLocklin stated that he has concern with regards to access to the public beaches, adding that there has been a great attempt to deny access. He stated that with regards to such studies. in other areas, districts have been formed to pay for these studies rathsr than seeking reimbursement tor a benetit that is generally paid for by the general fund or the ad valorem taxes ot the general taxpayers. He stated that the protection of the public interest and a guarantee ot beach access has not been addressed in the study. Mr. Huber stated that this is an item under data analysis and report preparation t~t will be taken into consideration and under the new Beach Management Law, it becomes more critical. Commissioner Goodnight aoved, secondsd by Commissionsr Vos., that the agreement for protessional services with Coastal Engineering BOOK ß97 0$1)",: 6.28' Page 39 II . ~ . ' . aoot( 097 Ð':o! 62,9 Sep~saber 23. 1988 CODaUI~ant., Inc. to pertora a .tudy and report on Beach Nourishment in the _ount ot $1152,1500 be approved and that said amount co_ out of General rund. or Capital Iaprovemsnts, whichever the Board deter.ines at the time that thIs Ite. is brought back. - Assistant County Manager DorrI11 stated that he teels that this aotlon is appropriate, adding that Ctatt needs to determine which of ths two funding sources is appropriate and then it would be in the best interest of everyone it Statt brought back a budget to the Board identifying the fund source for approval in two weeks. Opon call tor the question, the aotion carried 4/0. Page 40 .. .. - .-----......-..----.-.-- IDUK 097 I'JrJ 645 September 23, 1986 . . . . . . LILT BAREFOOT BEACH Prior to the recess being called, Cou~ty Attorney cuvler stated that the itell regarding Lely Barefoot Beach will be the neXJ¡ "itell and questioned the audience as to whether everyone that wants to speak on the itell is present at this time, to which various people in the audience replied attirmatively. Mr. Cuyler stated that the record should retlect that the answer was "Yes". ... Recess: 12:06 P.M. - Reconvened: 12:15 P.M. at which time Deputy Clerk Ruiz replaced Deputy Clerk Kenyon. ... Ite. 'US DISCUSSIOK ON LILT BAREPOOT BIACH COlDaissioner Voss stated that a tinal decision on this issue Mill be made on October 14, 1986, but today he wants to bring everyone up to date. He said that Tallahassee had intormed him that there is an excellent chance that the State will buy Lely Baretoot Beach. He said that the State at Plorida is talking about buying 2,400 linear feet ot beach, starting at the north end of the present 6,000 feet that the State owns, running from Higgins Pass north, totalling 7,400 linear teet. He added that the County is talking about a possible swap tor 600 teet whi~h when added to Lely's would total 3,000 feet. plus the State's 5,000 teet would total 8,000 teet of beach, which is Page 41 - - - . --,---_._....."'''''~;._,.._......"--...._-'_.,._'_..- September 23, 1986 the last big chunk ot beach lett in Collier County. He indicated that if the County goes through with this plan, everything would be put in escrow so that nothing would happen until everything was ready: Lely would convey the land to the County for the parking lot at the north end, which they are obligated to under their PUD, and pave it and would transter title to the County, the County in turn will put it in escrow until the State makes its tinal decision. He stated that the County has been told that it would be given an easement tor a road to a parking lot and asked to pave both and the State would take care ot all other expenses; the access to the beach would have to be done in an environmentally acceptable way. He said that this is the last chance the County has to get a beautiful piece of beach and the only way to get it is tor the State to buy it because the County cannot buy it: there is . willing seller and a willing buyer. He noted that the trads of the 100 car parking lot on the north end tor a parking lot of ðOO spaces and access to what would be a beautiful stretch of beach, which the people do not have access to except by boat, would be well worth it. He noted that the road that is in the PUD that Lely is obligated to build and will build as they build-out their development does not have to open until the State opens the beach at the south end, and then it will only be open during those hours that State beaches open.~ut the State will not open the beach unless they get the rest of the land. Commissioner Voss stated that the registered speakers should give their address or the location where they live. BOOK 097 ~',: 646 Page 42 .. . . ' "~'""-- '",....-,,,..,,'__".,'H"'.~..._,~>·"".,.,,·,...-·~"''"',,·'''''-''-''"'-~''--''''~-,>< , . . ' . ,o~ 097 n<·1 647 September 23, 1986 Commissioner Hasse stated that this parking lot and the beach area on the north end of Baretoot Beach has been designated and pro- aised by Lely tor the longest time and is past due now and nothing in good taith has been done so tar. Commissioner Voss reiterated that everything will be ~~ in escrow and nothing will happen to the parking lot until the rest ot the project is completed, and he has been assured by Lely that they are going to build the parking lot. Mr. Dick Klass, president ot Lely Development Corp., stated that the commitment to build the parking lot was made in 1977 or 1978, and at that time there was no time limit put on it, it was when a certain stage of the development arrived and the development is still not at that stage. He added that the PUD was revised and as part ot that agreement they agreed to complete the parking lot within one year and the year was up in late May ot 1986: the reason the parking lot is not there todny is because of the conversations taking place between Lely and the State. He said that the parking lot has been bid and it can be done at any time, adding that he will talk to the contractor this very atternoon. He indicated that it the State wants to buy the south portion, Lely would be willing to make the exchange of the north 600 teet, by Bonita B~ach Road, with the County tor the other 600 teet. Commissioner HastIe asked if regardless of the outcome ot the meeting today, Lely will put the parking lot in and will contact the contractor this atternoon? Mr. Klass replied attirmatively, adding that it the exc~ange goes through, the parking lot will come out. Page 43 - - - --_......, _ . ßW W~ ._.""'."';""_....,....."'..,<"=.._..w,...,.,.."""'''.,,..,__·,·___ September 23, 1986 Commissioner Voss asked it the land that is being conveyed con- tains more than just beach front? Mr. Klass replied that two back bay piecss are also included. Mr. David Hard, representing CAB, stated that the land outlined by Mr. Klass does not equal the 304 acres that the State oftered to buy Mr. Klass stated that at one time the State wanted to buy allot Barefoot Beach and appraisals at that time came in at about $7 million and sometimes in their paperwork they still use the entire descrip- t10n, but the parcel being discussed now is just a small part and Lely has no intereet in selling more than that parcel which has been outlined. Commissioner Hasse asked it the road th~t extends from north to south about a mile is gOing to be open to the public tor access to the southern end? Mr. Klass stated that when Lely started to do the planning work to develop the property, they agreed in writing with the State that they would give the State access through a north-south corridor to the State's property: that accees is for maintenance vehicles only, not the public. He added that if and when the State makes that area into a park then the public will be able to use the road only during daylight hours. Commissioner Hasse asked it Lely then would be obligated to continue the road to the south for public use? Mr. Kla~ anAwered within 3 or 4 years trom May of 1985. Commissioner Hasse aaked it Lely exchanges the 600 teet with the County, will the north road be open to the public? Mr. Klass replied !OD~ 097 ~",I 648 Page 44 . . I' , , , ' . 100( 097 W,I 64,9 September 23, 1986 "No," adding that the road would become private and acce.s to the State owned park will have to be either by boardwalk or a road or wha- tevsr the State decides to do. The tollowing citizens spoke agains~the land swap an~ Lely - Development be asked to tultill their agreement to build the··parking lot: Tape .8 Bud Matthews, Imperial Shores Hilliam McLaughlin. Little Hickory Island Emily Maggio, Bonita Shores Marjorie Hare. Bonita Springs Bernice Ciatfone, Bonita Beach Commissioner Voss stated that this matter will be brought up again on October 14. 1986. .... RECESS AT 1:15 P.M. - RECONVENED AT 2:15 P.M. .... Its. .11 CONTRACT HITS AN INDEPENDENT'PARAPROPESSIONAL, HELEN POHLE, TO PROVIDE HOMEMAXINO SERVICES UNDER THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT TITLE III-B PROGRAM - APPROVED Kevin O'Donnell, Public Servicss Administrator, stated that upon further research statt had to make a change in the provision ot the contract that was sent to the Commissioners: under Articles II and III, Bonding is being eliminated due to the fact that a reasonable bond could not be secured ',ecause only one person is bsing hired. He indi- cated that atter disc~.sions with the Risk Manager, County Attorney'. ottics and Social Services, it was felt that thers were two routes to follow: pass an ordinance relieving the County ot all liability or Page 45 - - - ",.m..'._._ September 23, 1986 get a very expensive bond, and in both cases it was telt it was not viable because the individual will only be temporarily employed. Theretore, he said. statt is recommending that both provisions be waive~ and that was the reason tor pulling the item oft the con- sent agenda. Commissioner Pistor asked it the County is taking a risk without the insurance? Mr. O'Donnell replied that there is a "Hold Harmless" clause in the contract. Commissioner Voss aoved. seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried 4/0, that the Contract with Helen Pohle be approved. - &OOK om ~-:,I, 650 Page 46 . . ' --,.--..... September 23, 1986 Itsm .18 BID .86-1015 IN THE SUM or $10,&2& AHARDED TO SIGNCRAPT FOR FIVE IWTRARCE SIGNS FOR THE COMMmrITY PAJUCS - APPROVED Public Services Administrator O'Donnell stated that sealed bids for this project were opened on August 27, 1986; tourteen bids were solicited and Signcratt ot Naples submitted the lowest bid. He added that the bid was reviewed by the Design Team and the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board which recommend approval tor a su~ or $10,82& tor installation and delivery ot tive signs for each of the co~- 1I\U11ty parks. Com~issioner Hasse asked what the regions were? Mr. O'Donnell replied, "North Naples Community Park, Collier County, Department ot Parks ell Recreation," under the Golden Gate Park, "Golden Gate . Community Park, Santa Barbara Blvd., Collier County, Department of Parks ell Recreation," the Marco Island Park, "Prank E. MackIe Community Park, Collier County, Department at Parks & Recreation," and East Naples and Immokalee will read the same as North Naples. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried ./0, that Bid '86-1016 in the sum of '10,&2& for installation an4 4elivery be awarded to Signcraft. Item .19 Public Services Administrator O'Donnell stated that these Change Orders are necessary due to the delays caused by the contractor who is &OOK 097 ~~, 660 Page 47 . . , ' ---~, · lOOK 097 PAr,[ 661 September 23, 1986 doing the building work on the Golden Gate and North Naples parks. Ths contractor, he said, has tallen substantially behind on completion dates and has delayed the other contractors. He added that initially it was planned to go with sprigging the soccer tield and ballfield and since the growing season is over, sprigging is no longer po~sible or practical, The opening ot both parks, he said, is estimated tor the tirst week in December and in order to have the fields ready tor the first season, it is recommended that sodding be done instead, hence the change. He indicated that the Parks Q Recreation Advisory Board has reviewed this change and recommend approval. He noted that during the time that delays are being experienced, the contractor causing the d~lays is being assessed $200 per day in liquidated damages for both North Naples and Golden Gate community parks, said amount being deducted from the contract. He added that at this time $24,000 has been held back in liquidated, damages, and the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board has recommended to the County Commissioners that the County Attorney consider any and all legal action in regards to securing tunds trom the contractor. He indicated that statt has been working with the County Attorney's ottice and they have asked for a memorandum outlining other delays and 'expense items being experienced. He noted that so far the other subcontractors have only asked tor extensions ot time which have been granted. Commissioner Pistor asked it the net extra cost would be less than $30,0007 Mr. O'Donnell stated that there are no assurances, but Page 48 .. - - ._-----""--,,.........._... "~~--~ September 23, 1986 waived and at this point staff has taken the Position that it will not the contractor has asked that the liquidated damages provision be waive the provision, and the matter will be pursued. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and Bermuda Sod tor Bermuda sprigging ot the athletic tields. au. of $23,880.98 be awarded to McGovern Construction for substituting the .ua ot 828,601.82 and _6 tor North Naples Community Park in the carried 4/0, that Change Orders .8 tor Golden Gate Community Park in - .. aOOK 097 ~ 662 Page 49 .. . , ' --"''''''''''''''-''''",-,.._--,--."~.,,,,,,,,-"....,,,~,-",,,,,_.,.;þ",,,,..~"',,-~~- . ' . .lOOK 097 ~é~ 669 September 23, 1986 It.. .20 BID NO. 88-1028 IN THE SUM OP 868,.77 AWARDED TO COLLIER ELECTRIC COMPANY POR ELECTRICAL HIRING AND CONTROLS - APPROVED Utilities Administrator Crandall st~ted that a majo~ renovation .. i. being made to the Manatee Road and Isles ot Capri pumpi~ .,stations and to do this separate bids have gone out on the items that cannot be done in-hou.e. He said that one item is the electrical work: 18 bid .olicitations were sent out and. Were received with Collier Electric coming in as the low bidder in the sum ot $66,477. Tape .9 Co..is.ioner VO.. moved, .econded by Commi.sioner Ha... and carriud ./0, that Bid No. 86-1028 in the sum of $66,.77 ba awarded to Collier Electric Company for electrical wiring and controls. Ite. .21 BID NO. 88-102. IN THE SUM OF 827,69ð AHARDED TO BLANKENSHIP I ^SSOCIATES. INC. FOR CHEMICAL PEED EOUIPMENT - APPROVED Utilities Administrator Crandall stated that the bid solicita- tions were sent to four vendors and 2 were received, the low bid being tro. Blankenship I Associates, Inc. in the sum of $27,695. Commi.sioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carri.d ./0, that Bid .86-1024 in the sum of $27,69ð be awarded to Blankenship I Associates, Inc. tor chemical feed equipment. Ite. .22 BID NO. 86-1039 FOR PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURANCE AHARDED TO VARIOUS BIDDERS - APPRO~IED Page 50 .. .. .. -."."""--.--"""""",, September 23, 1986 Sherry R. Rynders, Risk Management Director, stated statt is recommending that a split be awarded to various bidders. She noted that the Plorida Municipal League is a self-tunded pool and limits would be 100-200 with sxcess coverags ot 87ðO,000 that w~uld apply to public officials liability and things that sovereign immunity would not apply to, there is no water craft hull coverage included in the bids: deductibles on property would be $1,000 per building in all areas ot the County except Marco Island where they would be $5,000 per building. She noted that there is a eubstantial sum of money bsing saved on this bid trom the previous year and also from the budgeted Ugures. County Manager Lusk asked it ths Plorida Municipal pool collapsed. is there any other liability with ·the people that are mem- bers? Ms. Rynders replied "No," there is no responsibility with the liability of the other parties involved. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse, that Bid '86-1039 be awarded as follows: General Liability Public Official. Liabi 11 ty Automobile Liability Automobile Physical Damage Inland Marine Property Boiler/Machinery Pide11ty/carime Adjustco-PL Municipal Adjustco-PL Municipal Adjustco-yt Municipal AdjustcO-~L Municipal Adjustco-FL Municipal Crwap/BIA-INA Gallagher-Zurich American Adjustco-Ohio Casualty $181,977 48,ð97 100,8114 211,111 13.9311 190,681 4,7116 11.046 $1I70.9ð7 County Manager Lusk stated that Commissioner Holland had requested him to convey to the Commissioners that he i8 Opposed to entering the aDV1( 097 ,,<,~ 670 Page ðl .. . ~ _'~"'''-""".......,._"-,..,~".,,".¡,,..,._-, ..__"""'''_'"m,'___...'''''''''''......"".''''',;., , , . . ' . anø 097 ~'.: 671 September 23, 1986 pool program and he asked it this could be delayed until he was back: the present insurer was contacted to see it they would extend coverage until that time and they said they would. Commissioner Pistor stated Ms. Rynde~ checked and tound that it .. - would cost almost $200,000 to continue, and Ms. Rynders concurred. She added that she tee Is comfortable with the Florida Municipal League and Adjustco has CPA's that they use on a regular basis and everything is actuarily sound. Commissioner Hasse asked it it would cost anything to hold this ott? Ms. Rynders stated that the insurance due date is October 1, 1986, and it continued it would be at a higher rate than is being currently paid, and the County would not be looked at favorably to the companies who have gone through the work to submit bids. County Manager Lusk stated that it is a good program and recom- mends it. Upon call for the question, the motion carried 4/0. Ite. .23 BIDS POR ANNUAL CONTRACTS POR VARIOUS SERVICES AND COMMODITIES TO BE PROCURED IN 1986-87 AHARDED TO VARIOUS BIDDERS - APPROVED Public Horks Administrator Archibald stated that this item repre- .ents allot the Public Horks annual bids tor the upcoming year, everything from gasoline to asphalt, culvert pipe, timber, etc. He said that as a ~~y ot summarizing the results, good competitive bids were received in &ll areas and in a tew cases the prices have actually Page 52 .. - - September 23, 1986 gone down in comparison to the previous year. He indicated that the vendors in almost evsry case are vendors that have bid in prior bids or have had contracts with the County betore. He said Statt is recom- mending the low bidders, with the exception ot any purchases that may be necessary because ot emergencies and any purchases that would be very small in nature necessitated by the work underway at the time, also there is one bidder that is being recommended because the kind ot pips that he provides is if a unique size. Commissioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commissioner Voss and carried ./0, that Bids for annual contracts tor various services and commodities to be procured in 1986-87 be awarded as follows: Bid '86-985 Gasoline Based on lowest weekly price: Carroll Oil Evans Oil Combs Oil Chevron USA Bid .86-986 Painted Pavement Markings Florida Stripping Bid '86-987 Thermoplastic Markings & Equipment Corp. Roadway Markings Bid #86-988 Traffic Signals & Street Light Installation & Repair Mid-Continent Electric, Inc. Bid '86-989 Sign Blanks & Posts Municipal Supply and Sign Co. & Vulcan Sign Company Bid .86-9§'o. Traftic Signal Poles Hughes Supply, Inc. Southeastern Prestressed Concrete, Inc. Dura-Stress American Lighting & Signaliza- tion, Inc. Page 53 !Oil( 097 ð"~ ß72 .. . , ' ____..~~H._~.',"-,'" ...,..""".....,,_.,....".k_'_W.·''"F^._._·... . , . . ' 1m 097 ~'~ 673 BicS #U-i91 Bid #815-992 BicS '86-993 Bid '811-99' BicS #U-i9ð Bid #86-9915 Bid '815-997 Bid '811-998 BicS '815-i99 Bid #815-1000 BicS #86-1001 Item'H . Trattic Signal Traneyt Corporation Controllers/Cabinets September 23, 1986 TraUic Signal Component a Aquatic Plant Helicopter Spray Ssrvice Asphalt & related itsms Metal culvert pipe Concrete pipe Limerock & till Sod, _eed & tertilizer Tools Electrical service_ GEJfZRAL HAGB ADJ'UBTMENT OJ' GRADES AND THE 986-87 ---.- Interstate Material Supply, Tralfic Control Components Control Specialists ~ ... Asgrow Plorida Company Southern Mill Creed Products Coastal Fertilizer Helena Chemical Company Future Horizons, Inc. Lykes Agricultural Sales J. L. B. International Colony Helicoptera APAC-Florida, Inc. Better Roads, Inc. Metal Culverts Gator Culverts Armco, Inc. Joelaon Pipe Hydro Conduit Crews Pipe Company Harmon Brothers Apac-J'lorida, Inc. Highway Pavers, Inc. Cement Products Corp. Florida Rock Industries Sunniland Corp. Producers Fertilizer Haile-Dean Little Sprout Gary's Home Care Phelps Electric Company Collier Electric Company .. AND 3' ADJ't1STMENT OJ' Page ð' .. - - - September 23, 1986 Leo OChs, Administrative Services Administrator, stated that this item addresses tour separate components ot the Board Compensation Plan which were discussed at various stages ot the budget development pro- cess and were incorporated in terms ot appropriations into the recently adopted budget. He said that the recommendation is that the Board take the tollowing actions, to tormalize the actions taken in the adoption ot the budget: 1) Approve a 4_ general wage adjustment tor employees under the jurisdiction of the Board; 2) Approve the con- tinuation of th~ Merit Pay Plan currently in existence: 3) Approve an adjustment of the pay scales by 3_ to remain competitive in terms ot recruitment ~nd retaining County employees: and, 4) Adopt new Position titles and corresponding pay grades. He stated that the fiscal impact in terms ot actual cost is approximately $680,000 to institute those tour separate actions: that tunding is already in the adopted budget and will not create additional or bUdgetary impact tor 1986-87. Co..issioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commissioner Vo.s and carried 4/0, that a gen~ral wage adjustment of 4_. Merit Pay Plan, 3_ adjustaent of pay grades and 1986-87 Pay Plan be approved. Its. .215 2 ADDITIONAL CARRIERS FOR THE 600 2 100 - APPROVED Tom 01lift, Assistant to the County Manager, stated that after a Horkshop on the telephone system, the Board ot County Commissioners ßODK 097 ~:1 674 Page 55 . ¡ ~ ----_,,.,,""','~"'_,,··,_"_'_><__H... . , . ' . .oor. 097 p~r,! 675 September 23, 1986 dirscted statt to change the current lease agreement tor two addi- tional carriers for the phone system to a purchase agreement. He added that the cost for the two carriers is not to exceed $12,100, but as the itea was not budgeted, the tuñds will have to c~me trom - General Pund Contingencies. He added that these carriers will increase the phone system by 128 additional lines. Comaissioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carried 4/0, that the purcha.e of two additional carriers tor the pre- sent Dimension 600 phone system'in an amount not to exceed $12,100, be approved as well as all necsssary budget amendments. Page 56 - - - ____,..... T'I' BOIK 097 Pl',1 ern September 23, 1986 It.. .26 RESOLUTION 86-184 PROVIDING POR ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OF ftOAD IMPROVEMENT RlVENUE BONDS POR 81.575.000 - ADOPTED County Attorney Cuyler stated that i~ a request for reapproval of an item that was previously presented by Clerk Giles to the-Board and was approved. Clerk Giles stated that it came betore the Board about 3 months ago in the Special Assessment Road Projects in order to tinance an installment method tor people to pay assessments, and there was a con- siderable tie-up with the bank because there were changes in the tax law and wording, so the rate will probably increase from the 5.6% originally bid ~~ possible ettects ot the tax law, but all the banks were bid with the same provision. There also was, he said, a pre- payment penalty which should not hold the County back from negotiating this because it is a one-yeàr loan and the County is not planning to prepay it. Mr. Cuyler stated that the document eVidencing the debt has changed from what was contemplated, which was a simple note to a bond which is almost the same thing and will be held by the bank and the due date is in the document. He said that statt is recommending that the Board enact this resolution. Commissioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commissioner H.sse and carried 4/0. that Resolution 86-184 providing for the issuance ot Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 1986A tor Collier County, Page 57 .. .. .. --~_.._"". Septe.ber 23, 1986 rlorida in the principal aaount of $1,ð7ð,000 to tinance the cost of road i~rove.ents within ths County, be adopted. ,. .. !oDK 097*,'.1 678 Page ð8 of . : ' September 23, 1986 Ite. .27 ROOTIRB BILLS - APPROVED FOR PAYMENT Pursuant to Resolution 81-1S0 the tollowing checks were issued through Priday, September 19, 1986, in payment ot routine bills: CHEC~ DESCRIPTION CHEC~ NOS. 148575 - 148849 AMOUNT Vendors $1,034,145.74 BCC Payroll 034922 - 035552 297,S26.89 Ite. .28 8UDGET AMENDMENTS 86-440/441. 86-443/444. 86-446. 86-448/449 _ ADOPTED Commissioner Goodnight aoved. seconded by Commissioner Hasse and carrisd 4/0. that Budget Amendments 86-440/441, 86-443/444, 86-446, 86-448/449 be aðopted. Ite. .29 $12,000 INVOICE FROM STANDARD & POOR'S CORP. FOR RATING SERVICES RELATED TO 878.000.000 RESOURCE RECOVERY BONDS - APPROVED Clerk Giles stated that the invoice has been reviewed by Pischer Johnson, the County's financial advisors, and they recommend it tor psyment. He added that it relates to rating services performed for the Resource Recovery Bond Issue. Commissioner Goodnight aoved. seconded by Commissioner Voss and - carried 4/0, that invoice in the sum of $12,000 bs paid to Standard & Poor's Corp. for rating services in connection with the Resource Recovsry bond issue. aOOK 097 I"'~! 728 Page 59 .. lOOK 097 'J~l 729 September 23, 1988 It.. .30 RZAPPOIN'1'MJmT OJ' MR. MICHAJ:L .7ERNIGAK AND COMMISSIONER HOLLAND POR THO YEAR TERMS, EXPIRING SEPTEMBER 30, 1988, TO THE DISTRICT 8 HEALTH C L BOARD OP DIRECTO S - APPROVED Commissioner Pistor stated that a letter was received 1.o.m District Eight Health Council pointing out the need tor two appoint- aents. He added that Commissioner Holland has been serving and is eligible tor reappointment as a Non-governmental Consumer Elderly and Mike Jernigan has been serving and is also eligible tor reappoint- ment in the Provider category. Co..issioner Goodnight aoved, seconded by Commissioner Voss and 2-year terms exp~ring September 30, 1988. pointed to the Distri~t Eight Health Council Board ot Directors for carried 4/0, that Mr. Mike Jernigan and Commissioner Holland be reap- Item .31 PAYMENT O~ OUTSTANDING BILL IN THE SOM OJ' $3,943.75 FROM ACCOUNT OJ' J'O~ INDEPEKDENT IMMOXALEE BEAUTIPICATION DISTRICT- APPROVED Commissioner Goodn1ght stated that the Immokalee Beautification was independent: sometime in 1982 the independent district became in- District which is now a dependent district upon the County, at one time active and no one notified the person who had been cleaning the medians in Immokalee for two years, and a bill was run up in the amount ot $3,943.75. She said that she is asking the Board to approve this amount of money which can be taken out ot the taxing district. An additional thing that needs to be done, she said, is that there are Page 60 .. .. .. September 23, 1986 funds in the Pirst Bank of Imaokalee trom the Independent Lighting District that need to be transterred to the County's account. Co..issioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commi.sioner Voss and carried 4/0, that payment of an outstanding bill from Mr. ~ly in the sua of $3,943.75 for median work. be approved tor payment out ot the Iaaokale. Lighting a Beautification District account. Clerk Giles explained that he has spoken to Mr. ~ly and the claim is valid and perhaps the Public Horks Department can review it one .ore time and process it through tinance, it the Board approves ths procedure, adding that it was for the benetit ot the people that lived within th', area that are paying tor it that the work was done. Clerk Giles .tated that the bank account at the Pirst Bank ot Immokalee has b~en lying dormant tor years a~d it should be trans- terred to the County's account subject to any prior claims. Public Horks Administrator Archibald stated that in the upcoming year, there is millage set aside tor the Immokalee Beautitication District so, etfective October 1, 1986, there will be funds in the account. and the first order of business for the Committee would be to review the bill, approve it and have it brought back to the Board tor tinal approval. Commissioner Goodnight stated that the County Attorney's otfice indicated to do it now and the Board would approve it. Clerk Giles suggested thá~the Board approve it subject to the Beautification .. Committee's consent. SOOK 097 fiN, 730 Page 61 .. . , ' . . . lOOK 097 PJ'). 731 September 23, 1986 Co..i.sioner Goodnight moved, seconded by Commissioner Voss and carried 4/0, that Mr. Shely' be paid the monis. owned hi. tor .edian work. Co..i.sioner Goodnight aoved, seconded by Commissionér~voss and - carried 4/0, that statf be instructed to send a letter to the ~irst Bank of Iamokalee tor the transfer of funds trom the independent account to the County's Account subject to any prior claim.. Ite. .32 RlSOLOTIOR 86-18ð APPOINTING REV. THOMAS GOGGIN TO THE PUBLIC VEHICLE ADVISORY BOARD ; ADOPTED Nancy Israe130n, Administrative Assistant to the Board ot County Commissioners stated that a press release was issued tor the vacancy on the Public Vehicle Advisory Committee, and she received a letter trom Rev. Thomas Goggin trom.St. Ann's Church in Naples expressing his interest in serving on the Committee as an unaffiliated member. Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried 4/0, that Resolution 86-185 appointing Rev. Thomas Coggin as an unatfiliated member to the Public Vehicle Advisory COfJmittee for a tera ot three years expiring September 1989, be adopted. ~'f'!' Page 62 .. - - ---.-...-- · lOOK 097 "-,\ 733 September 23, 1986 ... Commissioner Voss moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight and carried 4/0, that the items under the Consent Agenda be adopted and/approved: ... Ite. .33 PURCHASE O~ TWO 24" x 36" DIGITIZING PADS FOR PLANNING DEP!- COMPUTER AIDED DRAFTING SYSTEMS IN THE SUM OP $7,962 PROM FLORIDA DESIGN AUTOMATION O~ NAPLES Ite. .34 RESOLUTION 86-186 RE AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT CM-126 HITH COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT IN WHICH DER AGREES TO AHARD ADDITIONAL $l,ðOO POR PURCHASE O~ MICROSCOPE BY NRMD See Pages /].3 9 -7-ž0 Ite. .38 ,,~,. EXCAVATION PERMIT .59-26' ISSUED TO THE VINEYARDS DEVELOP. CORP. FOR -THE VIKEYARDS OP NAPLES" PROPERTY Ite. #36 EXCAVATION PERMIT '59.269 ISSUED TO COMPLEX DEVELOP. CORP. FOR "SASAL LAXE" PROPERTY ON RADIO ROAD Its. .37 LEASB AGREEMENT BETWEEN BCC AND STATB OF FL, DEPT. OP AGRICOL1'CRI AND CONSOMIR SERVICES-FORESTRY DIV. FOR PROPERTY AT RANDALL ROAD AND 8TH ST. NORTHEAST See Pages '71-/./-71f.~ Ite. .38 ACCEPTANCE OP SEAGATE DRIVE AS COMPLETED BY HESTINGHOUSE COMMUNITIES O~ NAPLES, INC. SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE OF INSTALLED UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM: RELEASE OP BALANCE OP $10.347.65 TO HESTINGHOUSE POR ROADHAY LIGHTING Page 63 .. - - ",~."...-._---"".. September 23, 1986 Ite. .3S1 RIGHT-Or-WAY AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND STATE OF PL FOR PARCEL 109 RE HIDENING OF S.R.Slðl BETWEEN U.S. 41 AND MARCO ISLAND See Pages 7-50 -75""" Its. .40 RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND STATE or FL FOR PARCEL 114.1 RE HIDENING OP S.R. Sl51 BETWEEN U.S. 41 AND MARCO ISLAND See Pages 75.3-15' Its. .41 RENEWAL or CONTRACT FOR BID MO. 788 HITH HILLIAMS & SONS, INC. FOR MARCO ISLAND MEDIAN MAINTENANCE IN THE SUM OP SS9. 2ðO Its. .42 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH A. GAIL BOORMAN a ASSOC. FOR MARCO IS. BEAUTIFICATION MSTU POR CONSULTANT LANDSCAPE-ARCHITECT SERVICES IN THE SUM or 812. ðð8 See Pages7.s 7 - ~ Ite. .43 BID NO. 86-1020 AHARDED TO GOODWIN LAWN CARE IN THE SUM OF S3S1.800/YEAR FOR GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OP COUNTY OHNED PROPERTY Its. .4. THREE CHANGE ORDERS .1 TOTALING $18,300 ISSUED TO MID-CONTINENT ELEC. TO PROVIDE SECURITY LIGHTING AT FIELD CONTROL AND RACQUET CENTER BUILDINGS AT NORTH NAPLES. GOLDEN GATE AND IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY PARKS See Pages 'It<;... 77~ Ite. .40 RESOLUTION 86-187 CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH THE EMS TRUST FUND APPLICATION AS REOUIRED BY HRS FOR EXPANDING PREHOSPITAL EMS See Page Z.2£... _ &OOK 097 ~þ(J 734 Page 64 .. . ! -,...-..-.--....,.,.,...... , . . ' . lOOK 097 P~! 735 September 23, 1988 It.. ..8 CONTRACT BKTWEEN MEDICAL KXAMINER'S COMMISSION AND COLLIER COUNTY FOR rY 1986-87 IN THB SOM OF 816.3.9 See Pages ??¿::!'J 9ð Ite. .n .. - APPLICATION POR GRANT OP TITLE III, OLDER AMERICANS ACT FOR CONTINUATION OF SERVICES HITH LOCAL CASH MATCH AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT WITH AREA AGENCY ON AGING See Page. "7R/... ?ýC, Its. ..8 APPLICATION FOR STATI AID 1'0 LIBRARIES FOR ry 1987 See Pages 7??'''' 7?f: Ite. .49 PURCHASE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE PROM IBM UNDER STATE CONTRACT POR UTILITIES OPERATIONS IN THE SOM OF 810.e49 Its. .eo THO UTILITY EASEMENTS AND AFFIDAVITS FOR A PORTION OP THE TOTAL EASEMENTS NEEDED POR ACQUISITION OF LELY ESTATES SEHER SYSTEM AS REQUIRED ONDER THI WARRANTY OP EASEMENT AGREEMENT Recorded in O.R. Book 1220, Pages 717-726 Ite. .&1 AGREEMENT HITH DEVELOPER OP TIMBERHOOD OF NAPLES. INC. PUD RE THE RIM ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED Recorded in O.R. Book 1221, P~e'_786-789 See Pages :;t:~ - 794 Its. .52 CERTIPICATE POR CORRECTION TO TAX ROLLS 675 1979 TAX ROLL 1980 TAX ROLL 9/15/86 Page 65 j )~ ~ ;1 ,.1 .~ 'I Ij " ¡ I ¡i .. - - September 23, 1986 630 9/15/86 1981 TAX ROLL 638 9/15/86 1982 TAX ROLL 697 9/1/1586 1983 TAX ROLL 391 9/115/815 1984 TAX ROLL 253 9/15/86 1985 TAX ROLL 214/218 9/2/-9/115/86 Ite. .53 EXTRA GAIN TIME POR INMATE NOS. 36736 AND 486215 Its. .U MISCELLANEOUS CpRRESPONDENCE - FILED AND/OR REFERRED There being no objection, the Chair directed that the tollowing corres,ondp.nce be filed and/or reterred to t~e various departments as indicated below: 1. Copy of letter dated 9/9/86 to City ot Naples trom Gail A. Gren, Chiet, Construction-Operations Division. Dept. of the Army, enclosing (D.O. File No. 40-34,800-1 sheet) and a Condition of Channels Report ot latest examination survey of Gordon Pass to Big Marco Pass, FL. Referred to Neil Dorrill, and George Archibald and tiled. 2. Memo dated 9/8/86 to Potential Grant Applicants from Richard H. Smith, P.E. Chief. DER. regarding Fiscal Year 1987 Construction Grants Priority List and Other Program Activities. Referred to Neil Dorrill, Bill Lorenz, Tom Crandall and tiled. 3. Letter dated 9/10/86 from Douglas L. Fry, Environmental Supervisor, DER, enclosing short tora application (Pile No. 11124157015). which involves dredge and till activities. Rete»red to Neil Dorrill, George Archibald, Dr. Prottitt and Hled.r 4. Memo dated 9/9/86 tro. David Horley, Ottica ot Coastal Manage.ant, DEft. regarding Public Notice ot Revised Routine Program Implementations. Reterred to Neil Dorrill, Nina Small, Dr. Prottitt and filed. BOOK 097 w< 736 . . ! -_..._-~-,~,....,.,. Page 66 , ' . ' . lOOK 097 'A~-t 737 September 23, 1986 II. Minutes: A. 8/6/86 - City ot Naples - Regular 8/6/86 - City at Naples - Horkshop 8/1~/86 - City ot Naples - Horkshop 8/20/86 - City of Naples - Regular 8/20/86 - City ot Naples - Horkshop B. 8/24/86 - Parks & Recreation Advisory Board and 9/18/86 Age~a C. 8/8/86 & 8/21/86 - CCPC and 9/18/a~ Agenda " 6. Notice to Owner dated 9/11/86 trom John H, Hancock, Jr., Inc. informing that steel bar joist and accessories have been tur- nished tor improvements ot property at Collier County Courthouse, Naple., FL, under an order given by Material Servic~s, Inc. (Job #H-37843). Reterred to Neil Dorrill, Skip Camp and tiled. 7. Receiv~d 9/15/86 Notice ot Hearing to Metropolitan Dade County « Plorida Power and Light Company and all other interested parties, trom Public Service Commission, Docket No. 860786-EI, Petition of Metropolitan Dade County for expe- dited consideration ot request tor provision ot selt-service transmission. Reterred to Ken Cuyler and tiled. 8. Copy ot letter dated 9/9/86 to Oliver P. Tanksley, III, from Leo J. Salvatori, Esquire, Quarles & Brady, regarding Royal Sunshine Properties vs. Alvin J. Tellup, et aI, Case No. 86-0651-CA-01. Reterred to Ken Cuyler and tiled. 9. Memo dated 9/8/86 to all interested persons, trom D. R. "Buddy" Dewar, Director, Division of State Fire Marshall, regarding Florida Fire Safety Board Meeting. Referred to Neil Dorrill and tiled. ... Page 67 .. .. - _.,,_....,-,._"'.,,-_.... ._._~'".. "._.". -------''''''~_.--~....~~~...','-~.......,--.~."_."..."~-,._-,,.-._~,-"."..". ~ September 23. 1986 There being no turther business tor the Good of the County, the meeting was adjourned at 3:10 P.M. by Order ot the Chair. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OPPICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S),OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL ({£=¡¡:¡- PISTOR, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: JAMES G. GILES, CLERK .' ..... " iŽ/j¿:.:~~:". ~ - fJ".. T¥~:~-,¿7~'l~~ <t/- ~ : ,', : "~sse Ji~t:e:ìa approved by the Boad on ~. /'/!'" /' ~ \.~,\r~sented';'~ or as corrected \..., ~:'~'...,,':~~:~:.;,"Î\ ''''I" :"'r,IQ'" """""'" , - lOOK 097 I'V~ 738 Page 68 .. .; !