The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 06/25/2013 Item #17Gn 6/25/2013 17.G. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to consider an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2010 -28, the Meridian Village MPUD, to allow as permitted uses a youth center and other uses comparable to the permitted uses in this PUD. The property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Airport- Pulling Road and Estey Avenue in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 11.68 acres; and by providing an effective date. (PUDA- PL20130000886) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding this Planned Unit Development Amendment petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The petitioner is requesting an amendment to the current Meridian Village Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district for the purpose of adding a youth center to the existing permitted uses. The existing uses include assisted living facilities, adult day care, family care facilities, group care facilities and churches and places of worship. Residential development is permitted also. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed MPUD Amendment application. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. A finding of consistency with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and the Future Land. Use Map (FLUM) designation is a portion of the overall finding that is required, and staff believes the petition is consistent with the Collier County GMP as discussed in the attached CCPC Staff Report. Staff believes that the proposed Rezone may also be found consistent with the GMP Transportation Element and the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Therefore, zoning staff recommends that the petition be found consistent with the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP. Packet Page -1712- 6/25/2013 17.G. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition on June 6, 2013. A motion was made by Commissioner Ebert, seconded by Commissioner Homiak and, by a vote of 5 to 0, (there are currently two vacancies on the CCPC and two Commissioners were excused) the CCPC forwarded this petition to the BCC with a recommendation of approval. Because the CCPC recommendation was unanimous and no letters of objection have been received, this petition has been placed on the Summary Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a PUD Amendment. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposal is consistent with all of the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denial, that such denial is not arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the amendment does not meet one or more of the listed criteria. Criteria for PUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications Packet Page -1713- 6/25/2013 17.G. are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed PUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested PUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ( "reasonably ") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Packet Page -1714- 6/25/2013 17.G. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site ^ alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney's Office. This item has been approved as to form and legality. An affirmative vote of four is required for Board approval. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendations of the CCPC and further recommends that the BCC approve the request subject to the attached PUD Ordinance. Prepared by: Fred Reischl, AICP, Senior Planner, Planning & Zoning Department Attachments: 1) Staff Report 2) Back -up information 3) Ordinance Packet Page -1715- 110"N'. COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.17.G. 6/25/2013 17.G. Item Summary: Recommendation to consider an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2010 -28, the Meridian Village MPUD, to allow as permitted uses a youth center and other uses comparable to the permitted uses in this PUD. The property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Airport- Pulling Road and Estey Avenue in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 11.68 acres; and by providing an effective date. (PUDA- PL20130000886) Meeting Date: 6/25/2013 Prepared By Name: ReischlFred Title: Sr. Planner, Land Development Services 5/30/2013 5:02:12 PM Approved By Name: BellowsRay Title: Manager - Planning, Comprehensive Planning Date: 6/6/2013 4:31:57 PM Name: PuigJudy Title: Operations Analyst, GMD P &R Date: 6/6/2013 5:00:22 PM Name: BosiMichael Title: Manager - Planning,Comprehensive Planning Date: 6/7/2013 8:09:20 AM Name: MarcellaJeanne Title: Executive Secretary,Transportation Planning Date: 6/12/2013 9:41:30 AM Name: AshtonHeidi Title: Section Chief/Land Use- Transportation,County Attor �. Date: 6/14/2013 9:33:09 AM Packet Page -1716- Name: KlatzkowJeff Title: County Attorney Date: 6/14/2013 9:49:49 AM Name: FinnEd Title: Senior Budget Analyst, OMB Date: 6/14/2013 11:57:27 AM Name: OchsLeo Title: County Manager Date: 6/15/2013 12:59:30 PM Packet Page -1717- 6/25/2013 17.G. Co Lien County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION HEARING DATE: JUNE 6, 2013 SUBJECT: PUDA- PL20130000886: MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD PROPERTY OWNER & APPLICANT /AGENT: Owner /Applicant: Rock Creek Holdings, LLC 2670 Horseshoe Drive North, Suite 201 Naples, FL 34104 REOUESTED ACTION: Agent: Tim Hancock, AICP Davidson Engineering, Inc. 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 Naples, FL 34104 6/25/2013 17.G. The Meridian Village Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) currently permits a variety of uses including churches and adult day care. The petitioner is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an application for an amendment to add Youth Center as a permitted use. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is 11.68± acres in size and is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Airport- Pulling Road and Estey Avenue. PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is requesting an amendment to the Meridian Village MPUD to permit a Youth Center within the PUD. The petitioner also requests the addition of standard language that will permit the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) to permit other compatible uses similar to those already allowed. The MPUD currently permits assisted living facilities, adult day care, family care facilities, group care facilities and churches and places of worship. Residential development is permitted as well. Meridian Village MPUD, PUDA- PL20130000886 June 6, 2013 CCPC Packet Page -1718- Page 1 of 10 tI ry fl 9 @1 > ft < iG IL M Ip 4 4, 'Al Gw Xa rip r Ow A - ------------- - (4 STrl Z 01 6/25/2013 17.G. a. z Z 0 IN • I !2 CL 0 Meridian Village MPUD, PUDA-PL20130000886 Page 2 of 10 June 6, 2013 CCPC Packet Page -1719- ,e"%\ I 6/25/2013 17.G. ^ SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Rock Creek, across which is Rock Creek RV Resort, zoned TTRVC. East: Airport- Pulling Road ROW, across which are developed commercial lots, zoned C -4. South: Estey Avenue ROW, across which are the Salvation Army facility, zoned PUD; a narrow strip of vacant property zoned RMF -6; and an auto dealership, zoned C -5. West: Residential lots, some developed, some vacant; which front on Steeves Avenue and Oak Forest Drive; zoned RMF -6. Aerial Photo (Bing Maps), Zoning Map detail (Collier County) Meridian Village MPUD, PUDA- PL20130000886 June 6, 2013 CCPC Packet Page -1720- �I I� s c� f J 7 I H (L' fY d4l 'Ir 4 i �� Page 3 of 10 Subject Property - view to the North across Subject P 6/25/2013 17.G. Avenue (Google Street View) eet View) Salvation Army entrance - view to the south from Estey Avenue (Google Street View) Meridian Village MPUD, PUDA- PL20130000886 June 6, 2013 CCPC Packet Page -1721- Page 4 of 10 6/25/2013 17.G. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The Meridian Village MPUD was determined to be consistent with the GMP at the time of the original rezone. It is Staff's opinion that the proposed amendment will not affect that consistency determination; therefore, Staff recommends that the petition be found consistent with the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP. Please note that Community Facilities are allowed in the Urban Residential Subdistrict of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). ANALYSIS: Deviation Discussion: No additional deviations are proposed. FINDINGS OF FACT: PUD Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Amendment and believes that the addition of a Youth Center will not have an adverse effect of surrounding properties and infrastructure. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Unified control was established at the time of rezoning and continues through the present time. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Staff has reviewed this petition and has determined that this amendment to add an additional Community Facility does not affect the MPUD's consistency with the GMP, therefore, Staff is of the opinion that this petition may be found consistent with the overall GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The only proposed change is the addition of a Youth Center and Staff believes that the approval of this amendment will continue to be compatible with the surrounding area, subject to the existing development standards and project commitments. Meridian Village MPUD, PUDA- PL20130000886 June 6, 2013 CCPC Packet Page -1722- Page 5of10 6/25/2013 17.G. S. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. Usable open space is not affected by the proposed amendment. 6 The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. It is Staffs opinion that the addition of a Youth Center as a permitted use will not affect public or private facilities beyond what was approved in the existing MPUD. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Since several uses similar to a Youth Center are currently allowed within the MPUD, the amendment will not affect the ability of the site and the surrounding area to accommodate expansion beyond that which has been approved. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed amendment is consistent with PUD regulations, with the existing deviations, and seeks to meet a desired purpose of serving the surrounding community. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.03.05.1. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations from the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staff's responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, & policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Staff determined that a Future Land Use Element review, Transportation Element review and CCME review were not applicable to this amendment; therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern; The existing land use pattern was reviewed and approved at the time of the original rezone. The proposed amendment will not substantially alter that pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; No new districts will be created through this amendment. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. This amendment will not affect existing district boundaries. Meridian Village MPUD, PUDA- PL20130000886 Page 6 of 10 June 6, 2013 CCPC Packet Page -1723- 6/25/2013 17.G 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The petitioner believes that the proximity of this site to the Salvation Army PUD will permit the Salvation Army to run a Youth Center in the Meridian Village MPUD. 6 Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; Staff is of the opinion that the existing MPUD, with the commitments made by the applicant, can been deemed consistent the County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The project includes standards that are designed to address compatibility of the project. Since the existing standards are not changing, development in compliance with the existing MPUD and proposed amendment should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The proposed amendment involves the addition of a land -use that is similar to those land - uses already in the MPUD; therefore, the roadway infrastructure will continue to have adequate capacity to serve the proposed project. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; Whichever of the permitted uses is constructed on the site, South Florida Water Management District regulations and Collier County regulations will be required to be observed. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; Since the MPUD is existing, the proposed amendment should not create light and air issues. Setbacks and project buffers will help insure that light and air to adjacent areas will not be reduced. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by many factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market conditions. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; Since Meridian Village MPUD is existing, the proposed amendment should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. Meridian Village MPUD, PUDA- PL20130000886 June 6, 2013 CCPC Packet Page -1724- Page 7 of 10 6/25/2013 17.G. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual ^ owner as contrasting with the public welfare; The proposed development complies with the GMP which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; The subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing land -uses; however, the petitioner believes that the addition of a Youth Center to the currently permitted uses will support the surrounding community. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County; As noted previously, the subject property is already developed; the MPUD rezoning was evaluated at the rezoning stage and was deemed consistent with the GMP. The GMP is a policy statement which has evaluated the scale, density and intensity of land uses deemed to be acceptable throughout the urban - designated areas of Collier County. Staff is of the opinion that the development standards and the developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The Salvation Army would like to operate a Youth Center. The site is close to the existing Salvation Army site and therefore, would be an appropriate place to construct a Youth Center. The proposed amendment is consistent with the GMP as discussed in other portions of the staff report. 16 The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. This project will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan approval process and again as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. This petition has been reviewed by County Staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the PUD process and Staff has concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD document. ^ Meridian Village MPUD, PUDA- PL20130000886 June 6, 2013 CCPC Packet Page -1725- Page 8 of 10 6/25/2013 17.G. n shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. The Meridian Village MPUD was approved by the BCC on July 27, 2010. The proposed MPUD Amendment would add the use of Youth Center and permit the BZA to approve compatible uses in the future. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC was not required to hear this petition because no environmental issues were identified. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The NIM was scheduled to be held on May 30, 2013, after the preparation of this Staff Report. The Planning Commission will be informed verbally of the results of the NIM. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: Reviewed on May 13, 2013. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDA- PL20130000886 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval. Meridian Village MPUD, PUDA- PL20130000886 June 6, 2013 CCPC Packet Page -1726- Page 9 of 10 PREPARED BY: f� J FRED,REISCHL, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: RA ND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER PL ING & ZONING DEPARTMENT MIKE BOSI, AICP, INTERIM DIRECTOR PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT APPRO NICK CASALAN6tgDAk, ADMINISTRATOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION J--7`- 13 DATE 3-113. /3 DATE DATE DATE Tentatively scheduled for the July 9, 2013 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Meridian Village MPUD, PUDA- PL20130000886 June 6, 2013 CCPC Packet Page -1727- 6/25/2013 17.G. Page 10 of 10 CIVIL ENGINEERING - PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL - LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 26, 2013 Mr. Fred Reischl Collier County Government Growth Management Department 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Meridian Village MPUD Minor Amendment to Ordinance No. 10 -28 I" Review Dear Mr. Reischl, 6/25/2013 17.G. DAVIDSON ENGINEERING This application is for a minor amendment to a PUD to modify the existing Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to allow for the addition of a single use. The PUD currently allows for a variety of Community Facility Uses including churches and adult day care. This amendment seeks to add "Youth Center" (SIC 8322) as a permitted use to the PUD. The subject property is ± 11.68 acres and is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Airport- Pulling Road and Estey Avenue. None of the existing uses are being altered and the proposed change does not represent an intensification of use. The Salvation Army which is located on an adjacent parcel wishes to construct and operate a Youth Center on this property to expand their current outreach services. This amendment would permit that use as a `stand- alone' facility. The only other proposed change is to allow the property owner to utilize the existing process in the Land Development Code (LDC) in the future should they wish to request a comparable land use through the BZA process. Due to the very limited nature of the proposed change, it has been determined that the only pertinent reviews are Planning, Transportation and the County Attorney. Therefore, the required submittal items have been amended as follows: Enclosed for your review are the following items: 1. Four (4) copies of the e -mail waiving the Pre- Application Meeting; 2. Four (4) copies of the Cover Letter with a Narrative Description of our Rezone Request; 3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301 • Nal Packet Page - 1728 - one: 239.434.6060 • Fax: 239.434.6084 ,ran.. .. _ _ .. __ _.._..1..._ _..ng.com CIVIL ENGINEERING - PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL - LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 6/25/2013 17.G. DAVIDSON ENGINEERING 3. One (1) original and three (3) copies of the completed Meridian Village MPUD Application; 4. Four (4) copies of the Meridian Village MPUD Document, strike through and underline version (clean copy to be provided prior to CCPC hearing); 5. Two (2) copies of the Recorded Warranty Deed; 6. One (1) original and one (1) copy of the executed Notarized Owner /Affidavit; 7. One (1) original and one (1) copy of the executed Covenant of Unified Control; 8. Two (2) copies of the Completed Addressing Checklist; 9. Four (4) copies of a Trip Generation Report; 10. Four (4) copies of Attachment "A "; 11. Four (4) copies of Attachment `B "; 12. Four (4) copies of the original PUD- Ordinance No. 10 -28; 13. One (1) check payable to Collier County Board of Commissioners in the amount of $7,575 ($6,000 base application fee + $150 fire review fee + $500 BCC & 925 CCPC advertising legal fees); 14. One (1) CDROM containing all items being submitted. If you should have any questions regarding this application submittal please call my office at (239) 434 -6060 ext. 2983 or by email at tim @davidsonengineering.com. Sincerely, Tim Hancock, AICP Director of Planning Cc: Rich Yovanovich, Coleman, Koester and Yovanovich Mike Metcalf, Rock Creek Holdings, LLC 3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301 • Na1 packet Page -1729- Dne: 239.434.6060 • Fax: 239.434.6084 DIE pAVIDSON LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHMENT "A" 6/25/2013 17.G. COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 89 °38'10 "WEST 13.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF AIRPORT ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 00 °31'26 "EAST 1312.46 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF ESTEY AVENUE AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 °37'00 "WEST 340.07 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF ESTEY AVENUE; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 764, PAGE 757, THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) COURSES AND DISTANCES; 1) NORTH 01 °09'40 "WEST 129.40 FEET; 2) NORTH 88 °50'20 "EAST 40.00 FEET; 3) NORTH 01 °09'40 "WEST 50.76 FEET; 4) SOUTH 88 °50'20 "WEST 135.00 FEET; 5) NORTH 01 °09'40 "WEST 50.76 FEET; 6) NORTH 88 °50'20 "EAST 135.00 FEET; 7) NORTH 01 °09'40 "WEST 203.04 FEET; 8) SOUTH 88 °50'20 "WEST 344.12 FEET; 9) NORTH 00 °43'37 "WEST 372.75 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE MEAN HIGH WATER ELEVATION 1.61 (NGVD29): THENCE GENERALY MEANDERING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LINE, 940 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE SOUTH 42 °06'50 "EAST 46.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AIRPORT- PULLING ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 00 °31'26 "EAST 1147.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD CONTAINING 11.68 ACRES MORE OR LESS Meridian Village MPUD: Legal Description- Attachment "A" Packet Page -1730- www.davidsonengineering.com Die kk- PUD REZONE CONSIDERATIONS (LDC SECTION 10.02.13.13) ATTACHMENT "B" 6/25/2013 17.G. 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Response: This petition seeks to add "Youth Centers" as a Permitted Use in the MPUD document. The MPUD currently allows a range of Community Facility (CF) uses including Assisted Living Facilities Adult Day Care, Family Care Facilities and Churches and Places of Worship. The properties to the South include the Salvation Army Church campus which serves a closely related population and provides similar services. The focus of this use is as an outreach facility to improve the lives of children in the immediate and surrounding neighborhoods. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. Response: The land is owned by the petitioner. Any common areas within the project, including all preserve areas, will be owned and maintained by the property owner, or subsequent property owner or designated association(s). 3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. Response: The proposed project is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan (CCGMP) through the application of the development standards contained in this MPUD. The proposed project is consistent with the following specific policies and objectives: Meridian Village MPUD: PUD Considerations — Attachment "B" April 2013 Packet Page -1731- www.davidsonengineering.com n DFM DAVIDSON _ GI.�FEF.InG 6/25/2013 17.G. Policy 5.4 of the CCGMP: The proposed development is compatible with and complimentary to surrounding land uses in that the property is currently zoned for one of the proposed uses; residential The proposed MPUD is further consistent in that the additional ALF and community facility proposed uses, if developed, represent a set of complimentary land uses with the residential to the west and heavy commercial uses to the south and east. Additionally all of the surrounding properties will be sufficiently buffered as per the LDC and GMP. Policy 2.2.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME) is furthered by the water management design of the proiect which utilizes dry and wet retention areas for water management. As a result the cumulative impacts of run -off are reduced and water quality treatment is improved. The proiect development is planned to protect the functioning of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in Obiective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element. The proiect shall be in compliance with Obiective 3.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan. With respect to compliance with Objective 7 of the FLUE, Please see the following: Policy 7.1: Connections have been provided on Estey Avenue and Airport - Pulling Rood Policy 7.2: Through providing for vehicular connections on both Airport Road and Estey Ave. traffic dispersal is improved versus having access on only Estey Ave which should help the intersection functions but due to the small size of the parcel, a loop road is not practical. Policy 7.3: With respect to compliance with Objective 7 of the FLUE and its related policies, this proiect has been prohibited access to adiacent residential streets in the oast due to concern that it would negatively impact the single family residential areas. Meridian Village MPUD: PUB Considerations — Attachment "B" April 2013 Packet Page -1732- www.davidsonengineering.com DIE D O "N AK GAR IN E[ktNG N 6/25/2013 17.G. Policy 7.4. The project is intended as a mixed -use proiect with Pedestrian connections to Airport Road and Estey Ave Through the planned preservation of existing Pine Trees on the perimeter of the site, the site should better reflect a "green" appearance along Airport Road. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Response: The proposed MPUD complies with the buffering requirements for community facilities and adiacent land uses set forth in the LDC and GMP. The proposed uses, setback requirements and maximum building height are consistent with existing and potential adjacent land uses. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. Response: The proposed project will meet or exceed the required open space per the LDC when completed. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Response: The Project will comply with the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities ordinance where applicable. The site will be served by central water and sewer. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Response: The proposed MPUD will fully utilize the subiect property. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Response: The proposed MPUD complies with all applicable regulations set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code for a community facility development. Meridian Village MPUD: a µ� ..,...._r.._ 3 PUB Considerations — Attachment `B" www.davidsonengineering.com April 2013 Packet Page -1733- n 6/25/2013 17.G. C-0 *6-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.collierciov.net APPLICATION! FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ❑ AMENDMENT TO PUD (PUDA) F-1 PUD REZONE (PUDZ) ❑ PUD TO PUD REZONE (FUDZ -A) PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT(S) Rock Creek Holdings, LLC ADDRESS 2670 Horseshoe Drive North, Suite 201 TELEPHONE # (239) 261 -0072 E -MAIL ADDRESS: CELL # mmetcalf @napcocompanies.com CITY Naples STATE FL ZIP 34104 FAX # NAME OF AGENT Tim Hancock, AICP, Davidson Engineering, Inc. ADDRESS 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 TELEPHONE # (239) 434 -6060 CELL # E -MAIL ADDRESS: tim @davidsonengineering.com CITY Naples STATE FL ZIP 34104 FAX # (239) 434 -6084 BE AWARE OLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. DE YOURSE ACCORDINGLY ; ENSURE THAT YOU COMPLIANCE Packet Page -1734- February 4, 2011 6/25/2013 17.G. coTffer county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net Disclosure of Interest Information a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). I C. Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address % of Ownership International Investments, Inc - 206 Industrial Drive Glasgo, KY 42141 80% wholly owned by: American Materials, Inc. soley owned by: L Rogers Wells, Jr. Michael Metcalf 10940 Gary S Bell 10% If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address I % of Ownership Packet Page -1735- February 4, 2011 6/25/2013 17.G. C- er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net g. Date subject property acquired ® 4 -7 -2005 leased ❑ Term of lease yrs. /mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. PROPERTY LOCATION ^` Detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre - application meeting. NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section /Township /Range 2 / 50S / 25E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. #: 00386760501 & 00386761102 Metes & Bounds Description: See Attachment "A" for Legal Description Size of property: Various ft X Various ft. = Total Sq. Ft. 508,781 Acres 11.68 Address/general location of subject property Northwest comer of the Airport Pulling Rd & Estey Ave Intersection PUD District (LDC 2.03.06): ❑■ Residential ❑■ Community Facilities ❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial February 4, 2011 Packet Page -1736- COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION 6/25/2013 17.G. Co e> County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below. Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.6) 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Please see Attachment T" for PUD Considerations. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. Please see Attachment "B" for PUD Considerations. 3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub - district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses /density, and fully explaining /addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub - district, policy or other provision.) Please see Attachment "B" for PUD Considerations. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Please see Attachment "B" for PUD Considerations. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. Please see Attachment "B" for PUD Considerations. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Please see Attachment "B" for PUD Considerations. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Please see Attachment "B" for PUD Considerations. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Please see Attachment "B" for PUD Considerations. February 4, 2011 Packet Page -1737- 6/25/2013 17.G. 'co Ae'r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliernov.net s .0 • TOM M s• s s APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT(S) Rock Creek Holdings, LLC ADDRESS 2670 Horseshoe Drive North, Suite 201 TELEPHONE # (239) 261 -0072 CELL # _ E -MAIL ADDRESS: mmetcalf@napcocompanies.com CITY Naples STATE FL ZIP 34104 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): No Site Address LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section /Township /Range 2 / 50S / 25E Lot: Block: Subdivision: FAX # Plat Book Page #: Property I.D. #: 00386760501 & 00386761102 Metes & Bounds Description: Please see Attachment "A" for legal description. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED (Check applicable system): COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM a. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ b. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ PROVIDE NAME ❑ c. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT ❑ (GPD capacity) ❑ d. SEPTIC SYSTEM ❑ TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM ✓❑ c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ PROVIDE NAME d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL) ❑ Packet Page -1738- February 4, 2011 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION Ctn er County AFFIDAVIT 6/25/2013 17.G. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net We /I, being first duly sworn, depose and say that we /I am /are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We /I understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owner We /I further authorize representative in any matters regarding this Petition. Signature of Property Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner to act as our /my Signature of Property Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. State of Florida County of Collier (Signature of Notary Public — State of Florida) (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) Packet Page -1739- February 4, 2011 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION 6/25/2013 17.G. Co eT CA.Hty 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.collieraov.net PUD REZONE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS Application information must be clearly printed or typed. All material must be legible and completed in full. All requirements must be submitted as indicated below, unless otherwise determined during the pre - application meeting. GENERAL APPLICATION To be completed in full and to include the following information. PUD list of permitted uses Development Standards Table List of proposed deviations from the LDC (if any) List of Developer Commitments Refer to LDC Section 10.02.13.A.2 for required information DIGITAL REQUIREMENTS An electronic version of all plans and documents on CDROM as part of the submittal package. FEES Required fees in accordance with current Fee Schedule. Check shall be made payable to: Collier County Board of Commissioners. Application Fee ► PUD Rezone = $10,000 + $25 per acre ► PUD to PUD Rezone = $8,000 + $25 per acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review = $2,250 Legal Advertising Fees ► BCC = $500 ► CCPC = $925 Fire Code Review = $150/$125 for PUDZ -A EIS Review = $2,500 School Concurrency Fees — [reserved] School Concurrency Review Fee, if required * Mitigation Fees, if applicable, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Note: An additional fee for the 511 and subsequent re- submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Packet Page -1740- February 4, 2011 Ca r Cmnty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT Including all Appendices and Exhibits PERMITS Copies of State and /or Federal permits 6/25/2013 17.G. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub - district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses /density, and fully explaining /addressing all criteria or conditions of that sub - district, policy or other provision.) NEIGHBORHOOR INFORMATIONAL MEETING (NIM) Required per LDC Section 10.03.05.E. Please see attachment for requirements. SCHOOL CONCURRENCY - If the proposed project includes a residential component, you are required to contact the School District of Collier County at 239 - 377 -0267 to discuss school concurrency requirements. OTHER Any additional requirements as may be applicable to specific conditional uses and identified during the pre - application meeting, including but not limited to any required state or federal permits. CONTINUANCE FEES In accordance with Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Fee Schedule, when land use petitions are continued, the following fees will apply: Requested after petition has been advertised = $500 Requested at the meeting = $750 Additional required advertising charged in addition to continuance fees • ; • �. i February 4, 2011 Packet Page -1741- A10"N 6/25/2013 17.G. C- er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.collier-gov.net RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at its expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. Packet Page -1742- February 4, 2011 Co er C=nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION PERMITTED USES: 6/25/2013 17.G. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ( "BZA ") by the process outlined in the LDC: B. Accessory Uses: I. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses n and structures, including, but not limited to: CONDITIONAL USES (Optional) 11 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Table below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the (type of PUD) PUD Residential Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. February 4, 2011 Packet Page -1743- /'\ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION 6/25/2013 17.G. Co er county 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and /or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Setback may be either feet ( ) on one side or feet (_� on the other side in order to provide a minimum separation between principal structures of feet Alternatively, if the foot setback option is not utilized, then the minimum setback shall not be less than feet () and the combined setback between principal structures shall be at least feet (�. At the time of the application for subdivision plat approval for each tract, a lot layout depicting minimum yard setbacks and the building footprint shall be submitted. TABLE II DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 2011 * whichever is greater ** per principal structure, on the finished first floor. Packet Page -1744- February 4, PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA Sq. Ft. N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH Ft. N/A MINIMUM YARDS (External) From Immokalee Road Canal ROW Ft. SPS From Future Extension of Collier Blvd. Ft. SPS From Western Project Boundary Ft. Ft. MINIMUM YARDS (Internal) Internal Drives/ROW Ft. Ft. Rear Ft. Ft. Side Ft. Ft. MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES Ft. or sum of Building heights Ft. MAXIMUM HEIGHT Retail Buildings Ft. Ft. Office Buildings Ft. Ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA Sq. Ft. ** N/A MAX. GROSS LEASABLE AREA Sq. Ft. N/A 2011 * whichever is greater ** per principal structure, on the finished first floor. Packet Page -1744- February 4, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION 2011 CO *6r county Packet Page -1745- 6/25/2013 17.G. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net February 4, 110�, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION 2011 6/25/2013 17.G. Co) er County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Packet Page -1746- February 4, 6/25/2013 17.G. y3 3593839 OR: 3772 PG: 3151 UCCUID is 0111CIIlL Owns of COLLIE C01RI, IL 04/12/2005 at 08:16A1 DYIW 1. Ina, C111I .-. Grantee S.S. # Cis 4111000.00 12C Us 35.50 Property Appraiser's Parcel Aeta: DOC- . 10 29191.00 Indentification No. 00386760501 / 00386761102 UkC I OAi1s PIC[ Ot This instrument was prepared by and after recording return to: Marc F. Oates 10001 Tamiami Trail North Suite 119 Naples, Florida 34108 - w above flo 1= for recordine data THIS INDENTURE, COURTLAND ASSOCIATES is 2920 Satellite Boulevard, r ' hereinafter called Grantor, I( company, whose address is P. 2, o the second part, hereinafter call (the words respective heirs, successors and where the cot of Aril, 2005 between SIMPSON to f Georgia, whose address &-r-Grantee" arties of the first part, Florida limited liability 9, as party or parties of to include their ermits). VM NESSETH that: Grantor; r del ' of the sum of Ten and no/100 Dollars ($10.00) in hand paid at and befo elivery of these presents, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold, aliened, conveyed and confirmed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, convey and confirm unto the said Grantee, the following real property in Collier County, Florida: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. THIS conveyance is subject to real estate taxes and assessments for the current and subsequent years, and the Permitted Exception listed on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said tract or parcel of land, with all and singular the rights, members and appurtenances thereof, to the same being, belonging, or in anywise appertaining, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said Grantee forever in FEE SEMPLE. Packet Page -1747- 6/25/2013 17.G. OR: 3772 PG: 3153 K *. i Z-1 COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 89'38'10"WEST 13.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF AIRPORT ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 00'31'26"EAST 1312.46 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF ESTEY AVENUE AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 °37'00 "WEST 340.07 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF ESTEY AVENUE; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 764, PAGE 757, THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) COURSES AND DISTANCES; 1) NORTH 01'09'40"WEST 129.40 FEET; 2) NORTH 88'50'20 "EAST 40.00 FEET; 3) NORTH 01'09'4(rWEST 50.76 FEET; 4) SOUTH 88-60-20-WEST 135.00 FEET; 5) NORTH 01 °09'40 -WEST 50.76 FEET; tt-� 6) NORTH 88.5020 "EAST 135.00 FEET • �iv� Cow T 7) NORTH 01.09'40"WEST 203.04 F 8) NORTH 88.50'20 "EAST 344.12 F 9) NORTH 00.43'37 -WEST 372.75 E R LESS TO TH HIGH WATER ELEVATION 1.61 (NGVD29): THENCE GENERALY MEANDE N N L E, 940 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE SOUTH 420W50)-EAS E I N RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT NE S D0 '26" S .75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING E PARCEL HEREI S R SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND ICTIONS OF REC r o\ cam% EXHIBIT'A' ,ensrJm& loan v.' c"t-OL c .m.ao.aeo... Packet Page -1748- 6/25/2013 17.G. CIVIL ENGINEERING • PLANNING *ENVIRONMENTAL a LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DAVIDSON ENGINEERING Trip Generation Comparison Report Meridian Village Plat PREPARED BY: Davidson Engineering, Inc. 3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34105 PREPARED FOR: Rock Creek Holdings, LLC 2670 Horseshoe Drive N., Suite 201 Naples, FL 34104 April 2013 Andrew E. Rath, P.E. License No. 73996 3530 Kraft Road, Suite 301 - Naples, Florida 34109 - Phone: 239.434.6060 - Fax: 239.434.6084 www.davidsonengineering.com Packet Page -1749- 6/25/2013 17.G. A) =Land Use Category LUC 254- Assisted Living LUC 495- Recreational Community Center B) Analysis Criterion (Units) Assisted Living- 276 Occupied Beds Recreation Center- 23,000 sq. ft. (GFA) Table 1. Assisted Living LUC 254 (Based on Occupied Beds) X =276 Note: I ne average rate had to be used for the PM Peak Hour Generation because the fitted curve equation was unavailable. Table 2. Recreational Community Center LUC 495 (Based on GFA) �-� X=23 Calculated Traffic Equation Entering Exiting Weekday Daily Traffic 577 (T) = 1.61(X) +132.16 289(50 %) 289(5o %) AM Peak Hour Traffic 50 T = o.18(X) 34(68 %) 16(32 %) PM Peak Hour Traffic 80 T = 0.29(X) 40(50 %) 40(50 %) Note: I ne average rate had to be used for the PM Peak Hour Generation because the fitted curve equation was unavailable. Table 2. Recreational Community Center LUC 495 (Based on GFA) �-� X=23 Note: The average rate had to be used for all calculations because a fitted formula was not available. Table 3. Total New Trips Calculated Traffic Equation Entering Exiting Weekday Daily Traffic 778 T = 33.82(X) 389(50 %) 389(50 %) AM Peak Hour Traffic 47 T = 2.05(X) 31(66 %) 16(34 %) PM Peak Hour Traffic 63 T = 2.74(X) 31(49 %) 32(51 %) Note: The average rate had to be used for all calculations because a fitted formula was not available. Table 3. Total New Trips Conclusion Per Ordinance Number 10 -28, a maximum of 143 PM Peak Hour, two -way trips are allowed for this development. Based on the trips generated above, this development scenario allows Meridian Village to develop 276 ALF beds with a 23,000 square foot recreational facility while staying within the PM Peak Hour trips for the previously approved 48o ALF beds. Packet Page -1750- .. Conclusion Per Ordinance Number 10 -28, a maximum of 143 PM Peak Hour, two -way trips are allowed for this development. Based on the trips generated above, this development scenario allows Meridian Village to develop 276 ALF beds with a 23,000 square foot recreational facility while staying within the PM Peak Hour trips for the previously approved 48o ALF beds. Packet Page -1750- Prom: 6/25/2013 17.G. 04123!2013 13:40 0108 P.0011002 cdwnv 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT MAPLES, FLORIDA 34`104 262 -6724 Gpjy*TH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ (239) 2U.,Npp FAX pi.ANNING AND REGULATION 724 or "Mft in parson to the • i® the following and fax to the OPerWO" � at 289,252.5 a net Q - Plaase ling D rtmenl at the above address, Addrass{ng Depa { $ , Not alt Items will apply to every Protect. Items to bold tYP4 are raQUW* FOLIO NI,RABBRS MUST � PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department PETITION TYPE (Ind m* type below, compiets a �par,fe Addressing awktist for each Petition type] ❑ SDP (Site Development Pon) Q SDPA (SDP Amendment) [� SDPt (Insubstantial Change to SDP) [] SIP (Site Improvement Plan) BNR(( bvet Name ChanO to SIP) j] SNC (Street Name Change — U nptatted) (] TDR (Transfer of Developmwt Rights) Q VA (Varrenoe) VRP (VagetaWn Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site FRI Permit) ® OTHER PUD Anwrd - BL (Blasting Pennft) BD (13oet Dock extension) Carnival /Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) Q EXP (Excavation Permit) Fig (Final Plat ❑ LLA (tot Line ACQustment) © PNC (Project Name Change) j] PPL (Plans & Plat Review) (Q] PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ St nd2rd Rezone) D (a LEGAL IIESCR1PTfON of subject property or properties (copy of why dwcdptln may be atteched) Peroeis 25 & 31 of 2 -50 -25 FOLIO (Property► ID) NUMBOR(ss) of above (attach to, or associate wrath, legal descrtp w I more than one) 00386760501•& 00386761102 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as sppliOBW, If sbnady d) No Site Address • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of projeoiaile in reWion to nearest public road dghl- of-way SURVEY (copy - needed only for dnplatted ProP10") PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) l j� .j — r" I S O tj Rock Creek .we cA 94..r" ,L ' PROPOSED STREET NAMES (lf � r#Wbte) 44 O N/A SITS DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (foraxWkV projecx"fts only) SDP or AR or PL p Packet Page -1751- 6/25/2013 17.G. � MERIDIAN VILLAGE (MPUD) TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF EXHIBITS PAGE EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES 1 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7 EXHIBIT C MASTER CONCEPT PLAN 10 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION 11 EXHIBIT E REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC 12 EXHIBIT F DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 13 EXHIBIT G PART 77 CONTROLLING SURFACES 17 FOR NAPLES AIRPORT i Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1752- 6/25/2013 17.G. EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES: TRACT A The Meridian Village MPUD is planned for up to 120 residential units or limited community facility (CF) uses including but not limited to assisted living facilities (ALF), continuing care retirement communities (CCRC) and independent living units for age 55 plus and senior housing. Community Facility (CF) The maximum size for the ALF and CCRC for age 55 plus and similar facilities shall not exceed a floor to area ratio (FAR) of .60 and 480 beds. For each 4 ALF beds constructed, one residential dwelling unit shall be subtracted from the maximum of 120 permitted residential units identified in the Residential section of this document. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following primary uses: A. Princii)al Uses Assisted Living Facilities (ALF) as defined in the LDC and pursuant to §429 F.S., Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRC) and Independent Living Units (ILU) for age 55 plus pursuant to § 410.502 F.S. and ch. 58A -5 F.A.C; § 651 F.S. All ALF and .-N, CCRC uses shall be permitted at a combined maximum F.A.R. of 0.60. Nursing and Personal Care Facilities (8051, 8052) shall be consistent with operational characteristics stated on page 3 of this document. The maximum number of beds proposed is 480. 2. Adult Day Care Centers, (8322) limited to 150 adults requiring care. 3. Family Care Facilities, Group Care Facilities (Category I), as defined in the LDC and Nursing Homes, (8051, 8052) subject to LDC Section 5.05.04, excluding drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation facilities. 4. Churches & Places of Worship, (8661) not to exceed 1,150 seats. 5. Youth Centers, (8322) 6 Any other principal use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). Meridian Village MPU© Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1753- Page 1 of 17 be or-used, of- land used, i-n whole Ne building or s4uetufe, er- pai4 thereof-, shall efeeted, aher-ed or- in part, uses: b J o o f Meridian Village MPU© Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1753- Page 1 of 17 6/25/2013 17.G. �-w B. Accessory Uses 1. Boat Ramps subject to Section 5.03.06 and the applicable review criteria set forth in Section 5.05.02, limited to provide access for small boats, kayaks and canoes only. No dockage shall be provided. 2. Customary accessory uses including, but not limited to, maintenance buildings, private garages, carports, clubhouse, indoor and outdoor recreational facilities and swimming pools with or without screened enclosures, unlighted playfields, playgrounds and similar facilities. 3. Lending Library (Group 8231), incidental to ALF and CCRC uses 4. Personal Services (7231, 7241), Dining, Private Restaurant/Lounge and all customary services incidental to ALF and CCRC uses 5. Guardhouses and Gatehouses C. Operational Characteristics for AFL units including CCRC and Independent Living Units for Persons Over Age 55: The developer, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and/or be subject to the following operational standards: 1. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older. 2. There shall be on -site dining for the residents. 3. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents' individualized needs including but not limited to medical office visits. 4. There shall be an on -site manager /activities coordinator to assist residents with their individual needs. 5. A wellness center shall be provided on -site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall be provided for the residents. 6. Each unit shall be equipped to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency. 7. Each unit shall be designed so that a resident is able to age -in- place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted to lower the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted to add grab bars. Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1754- Page 2 of 17 6/25/2013 17.G. Residential (R) A residential development would be designed to accommodate a full range of residential multi family dwelling types, compatible recreational facilities, essential services and customary accessory uses. Should the site develop with residential units, no CF facilities will be constructed. A. Principal Uses The number of dwelling units proposed to be constructed is 120 units. The gross project density, therefore, will be a maximum of 10.27 units per acre. 1. Townhouse dwellings 2. Multi- family dwellings 3. Essential services 4. Water management facilities and related structures B. Temporary Uses 1. Model units 1.1-N 2. Project information and Sales centers 3. Construction administrative offices for the developer and authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 4. Sales and administrative offices for the developer, project management or managing development association, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses C. Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this District, including neighborhood community recreational facilities and property management and maintenance structures intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 2. Garages and carports. 3. Administration facilities intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 4. Swimming Pools, Tennis courts and other recreational facilities and buildings. Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1755- Page 3 of 17 6/25/2013 1 7. G. 5. Guardhouses and Gatehouses D. DeveloDment Standards Unless set forth in this Document, or as noted in Exhibit B (Table II), the following development standards shall apply to principal structures: 1. Setback from back of curb or edge of pavement of any road - twelve (12') feet except for guardhouses, gatehouses, signage, walls, access control structures and landscape features, which shall meet LDC requirements where applicable. 2. Sidewalks and bike paths may occur within County required buffers, however, the width of the required buffer shall be increased proportionately to the width of the paved surface of the sidewalk, bike path or cart path. Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1756- Page 4 of 17 PERMITTED USES: TRACT B Preservation (P) A. Permitted Uses 6/25/2013 17.G. 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and boat ramps (limited to provide access for small boats, kayaks and canoes only. No dockage shall be provided) subject to Section 5.03.06 and the applicable review criteria set forth in Section 5.05.02 (elevated and at grade as long as any clearing required to facilitate these does not impact the minimum required vegetation). 2. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries. 3. Water management structures. 4. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is compatible in nature with the foregoing uses, and which the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) determines to be compatible in the Preserve Area. Where Preserve areas are shown on the Master Concept Plan and the LDC requires landscape buffers, the preserve vegetation may contribute in part or in whole to the landscape buffer when it is demonstrated that the preserve vegetation meets or exceeds the buffer requirements of the �oo—N' LDC. Landscape buffers must remain exotic free while demonstrating sufficiency to achieve minimum buffer standards. Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1757- Page 5 of 17 ,*�\ 6/25/2013 17.G. EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for Community Facilities within the proposed Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. TABLE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IALF /CCRC/ILU and associated medical uses only excluding parking areas under buildings. Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1758- Page 6 of 17 CF MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 Square Feet MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 80 feet MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF BUILDINGS 1,000 square feet MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO 0.60 PUD PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK FROMAIRPORT - PULLING ROAD 25 Feet MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM WEST BOUNDARY & SOUTH 50 Feet BOUNDARY EAST AND WEST OF STEEVES A VENUE ONL MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS Front: Principal Structure 25 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet Side: Principal Structure 25 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet Rear: Principal Structure 25 feet or %2 of the BH (whichever is greater) Accessory Structure 10 feet Internal Drives 1 15 feet from edge of drive aisle Minimum Distance Between Structures %2 of the SBH (but no less than 15 feet) MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned: Principal Structure: 3- stories not to exceed 45 feet Accessory Structure: 20 feet Actual: Principal Structure: 57/75 Fee Accessory Structure: 27 feet PRESERVE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Principal Structures 25 feet Accessory Structures 10 feet IALF /CCRC/ILU and associated medical uses only excluding parking areas under buildings. Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1758- Page 6 of 17 6/25/2013 W.G. 2Actual height for a permitted church steeple if developed shall be 75 feet. BH = Building Height (Zoned Height per the LDC) SBH = Sum of Building Heights Setback from a lake for all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design. Architectural bank treatments shall include any structural materials used to retain earth such as concrete stone or wood placed to LDC requirements. Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Page 7 of 17 Packet Page -1759- 6/25/2013 17.G. i-� Table II below sets forth the development standards for Multi Family Residential land uses within the proposed Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. 11-1*1, TABLE II RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS BH = Building Height (Zoned Height per the LDC) SBH = Sum of Building Heights Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1760- Page 8 of 17 TOWNHOUSE MULTI- FAMILY DWELLINGS MINIMUM LOT AREA 3,000 Square Feet N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 30 Feet N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF BUILDINGS 1 1,200 Square Feet 1,000 Square Feet PUD PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD 25 Feet 25 Feet MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM WEST BOUNDARY & SOUTH 50 Feet 50 Feet BOUNDARYEASTAND WEST OF STEEVESA VENUE ONLY MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS Front: Principal Structure 20 feet 20 feet Accessory Structure 20 feet 20 feet Side: Principal Structure 0 Feet or %2 of the BH %2 of the SBH Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet Rear: Principal Structure 10 feet '/2 of the BH Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures Principal Structure 1/2 of the SBH %2 of the SBH Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned: Principal Structure 3- stories not to 3- stories not to exceed 45 Feet exceed 45 Feet Accessory Structure 25 Feet 25 Feet Actual: Principal Structure 45 Feet 45 Feet Accessory Structure 25 Feet 25 Feet PRESERVE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Principal Structures 25 Feet 25 Feet Accessory Structures 10 Feet 10 Feet BH = Building Height (Zoned Height per the LDC) SBH = Sum of Building Heights Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1760- Page 8 of 17 6/25/2013 W.G. Front yards shall be measured as follows: a. If the parcel is served by a public right -of -way, setback is measured from the adjacent right of way line. Sidewalks shall be located in the right -of -way. b. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge -of- pavement (if not curbed). Setback from a lake for all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design. Architectural bank treatments shall include any structural materials used to retain earth such as concrete stone or wood placed to LDC requirements. Garages and carports shall be 10 feet from principal structures if detached. There will be a minimum of a 23 foot setback from the back of a sidewalk to front load garages. Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1761- Page 9 of 17 6/25/2013 17.G. EXHIBIT C MASTER CONCEPT PLAN J \ WO N r B O It ww� 10 o ,ri v m g; a nQQi I dq oa 51 =c Q N cpS v i5 IrS <i (3,1 s W� WI � �- N tu 06 6 z Cr O� v R W o a Z F n C W J W Z O Wy N o F- z ZIa �¢¢' H uj I �w w m v ¢- Z..�Ip r Z V'iz> rs �° tq �° z z N w' a° c�$paF o W aam w 5� rcug a!; J o� Zjzv10�Og N UC U roOi¢ W W 5O '�Mp 1-W JJ � W a uN! IyL� �z U WO -3 > > O Z W_ !MR SI¢9 z y g o a4 0 �W�pp WuIy� a.,UaO mgXZ2 I_ ~ ~ V au. WS X / W�LL@@m / Oa I / it I I 6' o3AoadN, asn ow 11 N $ C ^ i O —mac— �`— .�----- - -� - -� N. __rmws�m9oe�oue'— Sd /l, _�' "-'-, no-_nemw �w m�a+uix9+are . --� � Q♦ I � I I I �wm I k�o I I 5 I I i I , Meridian Village MPUB Revised: April 24, 2013 YIb9l34 iIW393Ne.92 _. t 'mvcrar�xM�L'..sa_._a h 3 r ivIOaa, 03nDIldvo3% rL? r L OV 1JYG l I10p9 J Vkl } 3pVNN3l %33Np IKON \\ m > J W Z J N Z2I� N h 7 5 Packet Page -1762- F - - - -- I a'o 0 ( zip `v vw z r o- :I I z ( W� I ¢m r, L J J n w Zsm W �a v� 0 Page 10 ®f 17 \\ Y"1G -0-1HOIN F/YS gO� 000 Y1,flM1MS3h33lSON $, C d' N N3dOT3iNp i�alNn/mmaisaw AB p31pfINWYNYJ 36 M GwxydVNWL 01 N ` ° 5 ' i 'mvcrar�xM�L'..sa_._a h 3 r ivIOaa, 03nDIldvo3% rL? r L OV 1JYG l I10p9 J Vkl } 3pVNN3l %33Np IKON \\ m > J W Z J N Z2I� N h 7 5 Packet Page -1762- F - - - -- I a'o 0 ( zip `v vw z r o- :I I z ( W� I ¢m r, L J J n w Zsm W �a v� 0 Page 10 ®f 17 6/25/2013 17.G. EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION: COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 89° 38' 10" WEST 13.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF AIRPORT ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 00° 31' 26" EAST 1312.46 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF ESTEY AVENUE AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89° 37' 00" WEST 340.07 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF ESTEY AVENUE; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 764, PAGE 757, THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) COURSES AND DISTANCES: 1) NORTH 01 ° 09' 40" WEST 129.40 FEET; 2) NORTH 88° 50'20" EAST 40.00 FEET; 3) NORTH 01° 9' 40" WEST 50.76 FEET; 4) SOUTH 88° 50'20" WEST 135.00 FEET; 5) NORTH 01 ° 09' 40" WEST 50.76 FEET; 6) NORTH 88° 50'20" EAST 135.00 FEET; 7) NORTH 01 ° 09' 40" WEST 203.04 FEET; 8) SOUTH 88° 50' 20" WEST 344.12 FEET; 9) NORTH 00° 43' 37" WEST 372.75 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE MEAN HIGH WATER ELEVATION 1.61 (NGVD 29): THENCE GENERALLY MEANDERING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LINE, 940 FEET MORE OR LESS: THENCE SOUTH 420 06' 50" EAST 46.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OFWAY LINE OF AIRPORT PULLING ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 000 31' 26" EAST 1147.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD CONTAINING 11.68 ACRES MORE OR LESS Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1763- Page 11 of 17 6/25/2013 17.G. EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC: A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.0 which establishes the minimum right -of -way widths to be utilized, to establish that all internal roadways shall be subject to a 50 foot right - of -way configuration. Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1764- Page 12 of 17 6/25/2013 17.G. EXHIBIT F DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS: AFFORDABLE- WORKFORCE -GAP HOUSING COMMITMENT AND RESTRICTIONS: Fifteen (15 %) percent of the multi - family residential dwelling units (excluding CF uses) ultimately developed within the project, shall be sold by the developer to individuals, or families that earn less than eighty (80 %) percent of the Collier County median family income. For the purposes of this MPUD, these specific units shall be described as "affordable- workforce housing units ". Five (5 %) percent of the dwelling units ultimately developed within the project, shall be sold by the developer to individuals or families that earn less than one - hundred fifty (150 %) percent of the Collier County median family income. For the purposes of this MPUD, these specific units shall be described as "affordable -gap housing units ". The median income of the area as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) shall be the then current median income for the Naples Metropolitan Statistical Area, established periodically by HUD and published in the Federal Register, as adjusted for family size, in accordance with any adjustments that are authorized by HUD or any successor agency. In the event that HUD ceases to publish an established median income as aforesaid, the developer and the County shall mutually agree to a reasonable and comparable method of computing adjustments in median income. The following limitations and performance standards shall be adhered to: No affordable- workforce housing until in the development shall be sold by the developer to those whose household income has not been verified and certified to be less than eighty (80 %) percent of the median family income for Collier County. Such verification and certification shall be the responsibility of the developer and shall be submitted to the County Manager, or his designee for approval. 2. No affordable -gap housing unit in the development shall be sold by the developer to those whose household income has not been verified and certified to be less than one - hundred fifty (150 %) percent of the median family income for Collier County. Such verification and certification shall be the responsibility of the developer and shall be submitted to the County Manager, or his designee for approval. 3. No affordable - workforce housing unit or affordable -gap housing unit is to be sold, shall be sold, or otherwise conveyed to a buyer whose household income has not been verified and certified in accordance with this MPUD Document. It is the intent of this MPUD to keep affordable housing as such; therefore, any person who buys from the developer an affordable- workforce housing unit or an affordable -gap housing unit must agree, in a lien instrument to be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, that if the affordable- workforce or affordable -gap housing unit is sold, (including the land and/or the unit) within 15 years after its original purchase price that he /she will pay to the County an amount equal to one -half of the sales price in excess of five percent increase per year. Such payment shall be maintained in a segregated fund, established by the County solely for affordable housing purposes and such money shall be used to encourage, provide for, or n Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1765- Page 13 of 17 6/25/2013 17.G. ^ promote affordable housing in Collier County. The lien instrument may be subordinated to a qualifying first mortgage. 4. No affordable- workforce housing unit or affordable -gap housing unit in any building or structure in the development shall be occupied by the developer, any person related to or affiliated with the developer, or resident manager. 5. When the developer advertises, sells, or maintains the affordable- workforce housing unit or the affordable -gap housing unit, it must advertise, sell and maintain the same in a nondiscriminatory manner and make available any relevant information to any person who is interested in purchasing such affordable - workface housing unit or affordable -gap housing unit. The developer agrees to be responsible for payment of any real estate commission and fees for the initial sale from the developer to the buyer. 6. The developer shall submit a yearly report to the County indicating the status of the affordable- workforce and affordable -gap housing units. 7. This Affordable- Workforce -Gap Housing commitment will allow Collier County Growth Management Division permitting to be completed on an expedited basis as provided by the appropriate Collier County ordinances and resolutions. 8. The dwelling units to be offered for sale to persons meeting the affordable workforce and affordable gap housing guidelines set forth herein shall be offered for sale to such qualified persons and to Collier County or its designee beginning with the date of issuance of the building permit for each building containing said dwelling units, and continuing for six (6) months after the Certificate of Occupancy for each building containing said dwelling units is issued, after which time any unsold unit may be sold at market rates. Four (4) months after a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a building containing affordable or gap housing, the County Manager or his designee shall be notified in writing by the owner that units remain available for purchase by Collier County. ENVIRONMENTAL Preserve Area Calculation: 8.33 acres (existing vegetation) x 25% = 2.08 acres to be preserved. TRANSPORTATION: 1. Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy, and if warrants dictate, the developer shall construct an additional eastbound left turn lane on Estey Avenue at its intersection with Airport Road. The length of the turn lane is to be determined by Collier County Transportation Staff up to a maximum distance that can be accommodated along the developer's frontage. The length will further be determined given consideration to the project's access location and normal transportation engineering practices. 2. Prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy, the developer shall construct a turnaround �-� within the existing Steeves Avenue Right -of -Way as depicted on the MPUD Master Plan. Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1766- Page 14 of 17 6/25/2013 W.G. 3. The developer shall be allowed to use the existing curb cut on Airport Road during the ^ construction of Meridian Village MPUD. Once construction of the development is completed, the developer shall convert the existing curb cut into a traffic controlled right in- right out access point. 4. The maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed uses (both primary and ancillary) may not exceed the summarized PM Peak Hour, two way trips as shown below: a. For a maximum of 120 multi - family residential units (LUC 230), 70 PM Peak Hour, two way trips. b. For a maximum of 480 units of group housing (LUC 254), 143 PM Peak Hour, two way trips. c. For a maximum of 150 Adult day care (LUC 565), 114 PM Peak Hour, two way trips. d. For a maximum 1,150 seat Church (LUC 560), approximately 70 PM Peak Hour two way trips (10% daily traffic). 5. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks, and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer. Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. 6. Relative to permitted CF uses, for services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation as determined by Collier County Staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing and locations(s) as directed by the Collier County Manager or his designee. PROXIMITY OF PROPERTY TO NAPLES AIRPORT: The developer shall provide the following to the Naples Airport Authority: 1. An executed Aviation Easement and Release (first five pages), once the MPUD has been approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. A statement within the Project's Condominium or Association Documents that states the following: "The Naples Municipal Airport is located less than one mile to the Northwest of the Condominium, in close proximity to the community. Purchaser's can expect all the usual and common noises and disturbances created by, and incident to, the operation of the Airport". Purchasers shall acknowledge they have read the Condominium or Association Documents by signing a letter, which the developer shall send to the Naples Airport Authority. The Condominium or Homeowner's Association shall not have the right to remove this clause at any time from their documents. 3. Future SDP applications shall be forwarded to the Naples Airport Authority for review. 4. No Structures shall be placed inside the Runway Protection Zone, as labeled on the MPUD Master Plan. Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1767- Page 15 of 17 6/25/2013 W.G. 5. Building Heights will comply with the Part 77 Controlling Surfaces for Naples Airport as shown on Exhibit G. LANDSCAPING: The landscape buffer on the west property line and the south property line that extends east and west of Steeves Avenue shall contain trees with a minimum height of 12 feet spaced no more than 25 feet on center. Existing trees that can be saved within the buffer shall remain if practicable and be counted as buffer trees as allowed in the LDC. Hedges in the enhanced buffer shall be a minimum of ten gallon plants five feet in height, three feet in spread and spaced a maximum four feet on center at planting. Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 Packet Page -1768- Page 16 of 17 6/25/2013 17.G. EXHIBIT G PART 77 CONTROLLING SURFACES FOR NAPLES AIRPORT: n I CREEK RD ESTEY AV PRgSPECT AV FRATED BUILDING HEIGHT RESTRICTION NTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE BASED FAR PART 77 (7:1 TRANSITIONAL SUR- E) AND FAA NOR SLOPE ANGLE RE- REMENTS. A SPECIFIC SITE SURVEY AND ECIFIC BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATIONS ST BE PERFORMED IN THE DESIGN PHASI ZTIFIED BYAP.E.INACCORDANCE WITH PROPRIATE FEDERAL AVIATION REGULA- NS, AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE NAi w--"-k 1I LO AINE AVI WESTVIEW DR _ THY AV GAIL BLVD QI AZEL z zII .-,. m __� ) ( TERRACE AV I AVIS BL Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 'ONNECTICUT AV "s- � a LOTUS r J A AV o GUAVA DR _z ¢ I I W II ° cW ST z n l � o C ONUT CIR.v LIJ ESTEY AV w �> z W a- Y Q DAVIS BLV EXTENSION SR 8 Packet Page -1769- Paee 17 of 17 W > i ! >l i <1's i�7 >�_�� L° f i m __� ) ( TERRACE AV I AVIS BL Meridian Village MPUD Revised: April 24, 2013 'ONNECTICUT AV "s- � a LOTUS r J A AV o GUAVA DR _z ¢ I I W II ° cW ST z n l � o C ONUT CIR.v LIJ ESTEY AV w �> z W a- Y Q DAVIS BLV EXTENSION SR 8 Packet Page -1769- Paee 17 of 17 6/25/2013 17.G. Co er CcGunty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -6358 www.colliergov.net COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Meridian Vltlage MPLID Located on the norewmst comer of the Airport Pui&p Rd end Estey Ave intersection (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Mixed1Mtilli-se planned unit development ( MPUD PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Mike m— f, Mmreging Member( , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not Iimited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. 'These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property mitil such time m �,, new or amendeu covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process wil l constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and - restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and a planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. hthount�y l not is a certificatss uses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development m�Y o ng ctio� n activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, saf6 ned unit development. Owner %/' Owner Printed Name �rTek f LLL Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) yy� r Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this 7 � day of r I 201V�by I f f 1- " who is personally known tome or has produced as identification. �� ».f. "• =p�F{p�p airy ruonc MY COMMISSION # EE0710B4 ame typed, printed or stamped) - 1 :Y t7CPIF�S: July 7 2015 B.n Ttw NMery PuMk UnderwrBers February 4, 2011 Packet Page -1770- COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ PLANNING AND REGULATION Co Ter Cmnty AFFIDAVIT 6/25/2013 17.G. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 252 -8358 www.collieroov.net We /I, Mike Metcalf, Managing Member, Rods Creek Holdings, LLC being first duly sworn, depose and say that we /I am /are the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We /I understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As grope ne e/I further authorize Davidson Engineering, Ina to act as our /my repr ent�In—,ant garding this Petition. Signature of Property Owner Signature of Property Owner Mike Metcalf, Managing Member, Rock Creek Holdings, LLC Typed or Printed Name of Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner The foregoing instrument was ackn wiedged before me this day of 20 13 • by M Af— m -&l'L�� who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. State of Florida County of Collier TOCIA HAM 071064 4 d�Y aMMISSM ff �= EXPIRES' Juq 7,2D15 Bor!ded TM Notary Pao UMIe!vrt n Aoj-�L Y�)n 0 - - (Signature of otary Public – State of Florida) (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) Packet Page -1771- February 4, 2011 A. 6125/2013 17.G. ��12�314157g\ 4 � \lam. L ORDINANCE NO. 10 -2g_ W4 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004 -41,1 y ,VAMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CQDE o WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZoNIN& REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLME COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONW& 9 ATLAS MAP OR MAPS; BY CHANGING THE ZON$f -Fi CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPER g� FROM THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPffl� o ZONING DISTRICT KNOWN AS MERIDIAN VILLAGE RPUD T *A -- MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS MERIDIAN VILLAGE MPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A MAXDAUM OF 120 MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING OR TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY FACILITY USES INCLUDING ADULT CARE FACILITIES, CHURCHES AND UP TO 480 BEDS OF ADULT HOUSLG INCLUDING ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES, - CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY FACILITIES OR INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD AND ESTEY AVENUE, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 11.68 ACRES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 06 -28; PROVIDING FOR TERMINATION OF STIPULATION NO. 5 TO RESOLUTION NO. 90 -116; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, R Brace Anderson, Esquire of Roetzel and Andress, LPA and Tim Hancock, AICP of Davidson Engineering, Inc. representing Rock Creek Holdings, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the subject real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the subject real property located in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the RPUD Zoning District known n as Meridian Village RPUD to the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district Meridian Village MPUD / PUDZ- A- PL2009 -2031 Revised 7101/10 Packet Page -1772- 6/25/2013 W.G. for a project that will be known as the Meridian Village MPUD to allow for development of '^ community facility uses including adult care facilities, churches and up to 480 beds for adult housing which may include assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement community facilities or independent living units or to allow for the site to be developed as a 120 -unit multi- family residential project with affordable housing in accordance with the Meridian Village MPUD attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "G" and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004 -41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is /are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance No. 06 -28, the Meridian Village RPUD is hereby repealed. SECTION THREE, Stipulation No. 5 of Resolution No. 90 -116, which provides "The real estate located on the multi- family project will not be rezoned to commercial or industrial or any other non - residential use ", is hereby terminated. SECTION FOUR This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super - majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ��]' day of , 2010. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS D-WIr?l �� tCIC;.CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA u Clerk FRED W. COYLE, Cfiakrman •r7jtVi, of a's Offi { %ovilledge Meridian Village MPUD / PUDZ- A- PL2009 -203 t �} f this Revised 7 /01/10 2 of 3 Of -1773- Packet Page -. - - -- Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: LI eidi Ashton -Cicko Section Chief, Land Use/Transportation Attachments: Exhibit A — Permitted Uses Exhibit B — Development Standards Exhibit C — Master Concept Plan Exhibit D — Legal Description Exhibit E — Requested Deviations Exhibit F — Development Commitments Exhibit G — Part 77 Controlling Surfaces for Naples Airport CP\09- CPS - 00993 \74 Meridian Village MPUD / PUDZ- A- PL2009 -2031 Revised 7!01/10 Packet Page -1774- 'F 6/25/2013 17.G. 6/25/2013 17.G. 1 :ii: PERMITTED USES: TRACT A The Meridian Village MPUD is planned for up to 120 residential units or limited community facility (CF) uses including but not limited to assisted living facilities (ALF), continuing care retirement communities (CCRC) and independent living units for age 55 plus and senior housing. Community Facility (CF) The maximum size for the ALF and CCRC for age 55 plus and similar facilities shall not exceed a floor to area ratio (FAR) of .60 and 480 beds. For each 4 ALF beds constricted, one residential dwelling unit shall be subtracted from the maximum of 120 permitted residential units identified in the Residential section of this document. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following primary uses: A. Principal Uses 1. Assisted Living Facilities (ALF) as defined in the LDC and pursuant to §429 F.S., Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRC) and Independent Living Units (TLU) for age 55 plus pursuant to § 410.502 F.S. and ch. 58A -5 F.A.C; § 651 F.S. All ALF and CCRC uses shall be permitted at a combined maximum F.A.R. of 0.60. Nursing and Personal Care Facilities (8051, 8052) shall be consistent with operational characteristics stated on page 3 of this document. The maximum number of beds proposed is 480. 2. Adult Day Care Centers, (8322) limited to 150 adults requiring care. Family Care Facilities, Group Care Facilities (Category 1), as defined in the LDC and Nursing Homes, (8051, 8052) subject to LDC Section 5.05.04, excluding drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation facilities. 4. Churches & Places of Worship, (8661) not to exceed 1,150 seats. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following accessory uses to be utilized for the foregoing principal uses: B. Accessory Uses 1. Boat Ramps subject to Section 5.03.06 and the applicable review criteria set forth in Section 5.05.02, limited to provide access for small boats, kayaks and canoes only. No dockage shall be provided. - F'.+rt:ir�•cL julyl. � ?�Jli7 Packet Page -1775- 6/25/2013 17.G. 2. Customary accessory uses including, but not limited to, maintenance buildings, private garages, carports, clubhouse, indoor and outdoor recreational facilities and swimming pools with or without screened enclosures, unlighted playfields, playgrounds and similar facilities. 3. Lending Library (Group 8231), incidental to ALF and CCRC uses 4. Personal Services (7231, 7241), Dining, Private Restaurant/Lounge and all customary services incidental to ALF and CCRC uses 5. Guardhouses and Gatehouses C. Operational Characteristics for AFL units including CCRC and Independent Living Units for Persons Over Age 55: The developer, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and/or be subject to the following operational standards: 1. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older. 2. There shall be on -site dining for the residents. 3. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents' individualized needs including but not limited to medical office visits. 4. 'There shall be an on -site manager/activities coordinator to assist residents with their individual needs. 5. A wellness center shall be provided on -site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall be provided for the residents. 6. Each unit shall be equipped to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency. 7. Each unit shall be designed so that a resident is able to age -in- place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted to lower the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted to add grab bars. Packet Page -1776- 6/25/2013 17.G. Residential M) A residential development would be designed to accommodate a full range of residential multi family dwelling types, compatible recreational facilities,, essential services and customary accessory uses. Should the site develop with residential units, no CF facilities will be constructed. A. Principal Uses The number of dwelling units proposed to be constructed is 120 units. The gross project density, therefore, will be a maximum of 10.27 units per acre. 1. Townhouse dwellings 2. Multi- family dwellings 3. Essential services 4. Water management facilities and related structures B. Temporary Uses 1. Model units 2. Project information and Sales centers 3. Construction administrative offices for the developer and authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parldng areas and related uses. 4. Sales and administrative offices for the developer, project management or managing development association, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses C. Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this District including neighborhood community recreational facilities and property management and maintenance structures intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 2. Garages and carports. 3. Administration facilities intended to serve the residents and guests of the proposed development. 4. Swimming Pools, Tennis courts and other recreational facilities and buildings. Rvvi -,ied: July 1,2010 Packet Page -1777- 6/25/2013 W.G. 5. Guardhouses and Gatehouses D. Development Standards Unless set forth in this Document, or as noted in Exhibit B (Table H), the following development standards shall apply to principal structures: 1. Setback from back of curb or edge of pavement of any road - twelve (12') feet except for guardhouses, gatehouses, signage, walls, access control structures and landscape features, which shall. meet LDC requirements where applicable. 2. Sidewalks and bike paths may occur within County required buffers, however, the width of the required buffer shall be increased proportionately to the width of the paved surface of the sidewalk, bike path or cart path. R.nisvd: JuIVI.: ?t)!o Packet Page -1778- �. PERAUTTED USES: TRACT B Preservation 0 A. Permitted Uses 6/25/2013 17. G. 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and boat ramps (limited to provide access for small boats, kayaks and canoes only. No dockage shall be provided) subject to Section 5.03.06 and the applicable review criteria set forth in Section 5.05.02 (elevated and at grade as long as any clearing required to facilitate these does not impact the minimum required vegetation). 2. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries. 3. Water management structures. 4. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is compatible in Mature uAth the foregoing uses, and -rbidh the Board of Zoning Appe : E BZA) determines - to be compatible in the Preserve Area. Where Preserve areas are shown on the Master Concept Plan and the LDC requires landscape buffers, the preserve vegetation may contribute in part or in whole to the landscape buffer when it is demonstrated that the preserve vegetation meets or exceeds the buffer requirements of the LDC. Landscape buffers must remain exotic free while demonstrating sufficiency to achieve minimum buffer standards. oridl.111 Vi fl ti;I: M111JI) ko ;'ro is July I'M 10 Packet Page -1779- 6/25/2013 W.G. EXIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for Community Facilities within the proposed Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. TABLE I COAEWIUNITY FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 'ALF /CCRC/ILU and associated medical uses only excluding parking areas under buildings. i lc.ri�li ;nr Vilhgi: NIPHD Duly i• -t0 10 Packet Page -1780- N r e r, ni 17 CF N WEVI M LOT AREA 10,000 Square Feet AIEVE i M LOT WIDTH 80 feet MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF 1,000 square feet BUILDINGS MAXIMUM FLOOR .'"RIP —A. RATIO - PUD PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS ATEVEVIUM BUILDING SETBACK 25 Feet FROMAIRPORT- PULLING ROAD MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM WESTBOUNDARY& SOUTH 50 Feet BOUADARYEASTAND WEST OFSTEEVES AVENUE ONL MINEM M YARD REQUIREMENTS Front: Principal Structure 25 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet Side: Principal Structure 25 feet Accessory Structure 10 feet Rear: Principal Structure 25 feet or % of the BH (whichever is greater) Accessory Structure 10 feet Internal Drives 15 feet from edge of drive aisle mum Distance Between Structures '/ of the SBH (but no less than 15 feet) NLAX MUM HEIGHT Zoned: Principal Structure: 3- stories not to exceed 45 feet Accessory Structure: 20 feet Actual: Principal Structure: 57/75 Fee Accessory Structure: 27 feet PRESERVE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Principal Structures 25 feet Accessory Structures 10 feet 'ALF /CCRC/ILU and associated medical uses only excluding parking areas under buildings. i lc.ri�li ;nr Vilhgi: NIPHD Duly i• -t0 10 Packet Page -1780- N r e r, ni 17 6/25/2013 17.G. 2Actual height for a permitted church steeple if developed shall be 75 feet. BH = Building Height (Zoned Height per the LDC) SBH = Sum of Building Heights Setback from a lake for all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design. Architectural bank treatments shall include any structural materials used to retain earth such as concrete stone or wood placed to LDC requirements. Packet Page -1781- 1-1*s. 6/25/2013 17.G. Table H below sets forth the development standards for Multi Family Residential land uses within the proposed Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. TABLE H RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BH = Building Height (Zoned Height per the LDC) SBH = Sum of Building Heights {1r.�ricl:.ui Vi1L•.��r i`,,It'1.)D (::'Vi.s(Ni: Nly 1, 2010 Packet Page -1782- TOWNHOUSE MULTI -FAM LY DWELLINGS AI NIM[UM LOT AREA 3,000 Square Feet N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 30 Feet NIA AUNIMUM FLOOR AREA OF 1,200 Square Feet 1,000 Square Feet BUILDINGS PUD PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS . MIINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 2r F^ t :. 25 Feet - P FROMALUORT -fi _1_.PV ;'ROAD AMMMUM BUILDING SETBACK (FROM WEST BOUNDARY & SOUTH 50 Feet 50 Feet BOUNDARYEASTAND WEST OF STEEPW AVENUEOA1 M gMUM YARD REgunu 1viENTS Front: Principal Structure 20 feet 20 feet Accessory Structure 20 feet 20 feet Side: Principal Structure 0 Feet or Y2 of the BH % of the SBH Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet Rear: Principal Structure 10 feet 1/2 of the BH Accessory Structure '10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures Principal Structure %2 of the SBH % of the SBH Accessory Structure 10 feet 10 feet MAXIMUM HEIGHT Zoned: Principal Structure 3- stories not to 3- stories not to exceed 45 Feet exceed 45 Feet Accessory Structure 25 Feet 25 Feet Actual: Principal Structure 45 Feet 45 Feet Accessory Structure 25 Feet 25 Feet PRESERVE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Principal Structures 25 Feet 25 Feet Accessory Structures 10 Feet 10 Feet BH = Building Height (Zoned Height per the LDC) SBH = Sum of Building Heights {1r.�ricl:.ui Vi1L•.��r i`,,It'1.)D (::'Vi.s(Ni: Nly 1, 2010 Packet Page -1782- 6/25/2013 17.G. Front yards shall be measured as follows: a. If the parcel is served by a public right -of -way, setback is measured from the adjacent right of way line. Sidewalks shall be located in the right -of -way. b. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge -of- pavement (if not curbed). Setback from a lake for all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design. Architectural bank treatments shall include any structural materials used to retain earth such as concrete stone or wood placed to LDC requirements. Garages and carports shall be 10 feet from principal structures if detached. There will be a minimum of a 23 foot setback from the back of a sidewalk to front load garages. Packet Page -1783- 6/25/2013 17.G. FxiExhibit G FM� m y r y. �/ V7 rA a7 y p rc it ¢ z uw O ko F 93 < ttl D w in r°c q 11�� 6 ¢ 4 p6 � � �•�U PO w f�l i7 G h m o � Q O EEF C7 z z LL [11 � o K E 0CL �lu�� F_ yz� ii � o U Z ww � � C4 � �- �¢o �n j z o ��[ 1 � Zo z 7 � QQ 9¢ a =a [SOU �' ,7 :D:3 C .� Ve' to W F- J LU _5 r C =CO 9Xzzz M p 0 1 F � CC Es's' W � Zr _. / qa z / Oo 9 / f - - - --I K cd �zza s3 — WO143hwoo S i z o, z _ m I 3 Pqi Ottawa �Nwaz N 0 I Z:` S� /• W- O: rrnwnurmn��+ay.f -� �. / wo"�+�ron.+n Lra.c;m crr:�+uemcvat� 1' - - - -- ------------------------ 9 I II O3AOUdwl 39n O x �J 50:JNIN m � I ir ooh r OZ Nal I z I � � .•• � T �_.. -.J Q�3�Vd1 NCIOH ZVid � I — — — — — Edg \ xvMyo-fu g�� r - - -- I � > W Z \ 1E3dvj3/,30 imn�n tMtL}3W AO tL = V1 \ �lII1l.SN0� 30 OS I]tK1DYYIMIF� � IL •"' 5E 5w as I zz N 6i Ue I 1 D tj a x6 o j `• S aoq I s } x U ! Packet Page -1784- j 6/25/2013 17.G. EXIMIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION: COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1/ CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 89° 38' 10" WEST 13.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF AIRPORT ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 000 31' 26" EAST 1312.46 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF ESTEY AVENUE AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 891 37' 00" WEST 340.07 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF ESTEY AVENUE; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT AS RECORDED IN 0.R BOOK 764, PAGE 757, THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) COURSES AND DISTANCES: 1) NORTH 01 ° 09' 40" WEST 129.40 FEET; 2) NORTH 88° 50' 20" EAST 40.00 FEET; 3) NORTH 01° 9'40- WEST 50.76 FEET; 4) SOUTH 88° 50' 20" WEST 135.00 FEET; 5) NORTH 0 1 a 09' 40" WEST 50.76 FEET; 6) NORTH 886 50'207 EAST 135.00 FEET; 7) NORTH 010 09' 40" WEST 203.04 FEET; 8) SOUTH 88° 50'20" WEST 344.12 FEET; °9) NORTH 00" 434 3r. 'JEST 372.75- FEET MORE -OR LESS TO 7=1E IN -HiGH WATEiZ ELEVATION 1.61 (NGVD 29): THENCE GENERALLY MEANDERING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LINE, 940 FEET MORE OR LESS: THENCE SOUTH 420 06' 50" EAST 46.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OFWAY LINE OF AIRPORT PULLING ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 000 31' 26" EAST 1147.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD CONTAINING 11.68 ACRES MORE OR LESS Packet Page -1785- n 6/25/2013 17.G. EMT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC: 1. A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.0 which establishes the minimum right -of -way widths to be utilized, to establish that all internal roadways shall be subject to a 50 foot right - of -way configuration. I c% - )u!y 20I0 Packet Page -1786- 6/25/2013 17.G. EXHMIT F DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS: AFFORDABLE- WORKFORCE -GAP HOUSING COMMITMENT AND RESTRICTIONS: Fifteen (15 %) percent of the multi- family residential dwelling units (excluding CF uses) ultimately developed within the project, shall be sold by the developer to individuals, or families that earn less than eighty (80 %) percent of the Collier County median family income. For the purposes of this MPUD, these specific units shall be described as "affordable- workforce housing units ". Five (5 %) percent of the dwelling units ultimately developed within the project, shall be sold by the developer to individuals or families that earn less than one - hundred fifty (150 %) percent of the Collier County median family income. For the purposes of this MPUD, these specific units shall be described as "affordable -gap housing units ". The median income of the area as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) shall be the then current median income for the Naples Metropolitan Statistical Area, established periodically by HUD and published in the Federal Register, as adjusted for family size, in accordance with any adjustments that are authorized by HUD or any successor agency. In the event that HUD ceases to publish an established median income as aforesaid, the developer and the County shall mu LaL6y agree to a reasonable and comparable method of computing adjuIixFuw in median income. The following limitations and performance standards shall be adhered to: ^ 1. No affordable- workforce housing until in the development shall be sold by the developer to those whose household income has not been verified and certified to be less than eighty (80 %) percent of the median family income for Collier County. Such verification and certification shall be the responsibility of the developer and shall be submitted to the County Manager, or his designee for approval. 2. No affordable -gap housing unit in the development shall be sold by the developer to those whose household income has not been verified and certified to be less than one - hundred fifty (150 %) percent of the median family income for Collier County. Such verification and certification shall be the responsibility of the developer and shall be submitted to the County Manager, or his designee for approval. 3. No affordable- workforce housing unit or affordable -gap housing unit is to be sold, shall be sold, or otherwise conveyed to a buyer whose household income has not been verified and certified in accordance with this MPUD Document. It is the intent of this MPUD to keep affordable housing as such; therefore, any person who buys from the developer an affordable- workforce housing unit or an affordable -gap housing unit must agree, in a lien instrument to be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, that if the affordable- workforce or affordable -gap housing unit is sold, (including the land and/or the unit) within 15 years after its original purchase price that he /she will pay to the County an amount equal to one -half of the sales price in excess of five percent increase per year. Such payment shall be maintained in a segregated fund, established by the County solely for affordable housing purposes and such money shall be used to encourage, provide for, or ^ M!T :)dJ;uI VidJJVV = 11'01) july1. '010 Packet Page -1787- 6/25/2013 17.G. promote affordable housing in Collier County. The lien instrument may be subordinated to a qualifying first mortgage. 4. No affordable- workforce housing unit or affordable -gap housing unit in any building or structure in the development shall be occupied by the developer, any person related to or affiliated with the developer, or resident manager. S. When the developer advertises, sells, or maintains the affordable - workforce housing unit or the affordable -gap housing unit, it must advertise, sell and maintain the same in a nondiscriminatory manner and make available any relevant information to any person who is interested in purchasing such affordable- workface housing unit or affordable -gap housing unit. The developer agrees to be responsible for payment of any real estate commission and fees for the initial sale from the developer to the buyer. 6. The developer shall submit a yearly report to the County indicating the status of the affordable- workforce and affordable -gap housing units. 7. - T•, s; Nousing co=uitment will allow C60 -i k`_,. %ity Growth Management Division permitting to be completed on an expedited basis as provided by the appropriate Collier County ordinances and resolutions. 8. The dwelling units to be offered for sale to persons meeting the affordable workforce and affordable gap housing guidelines set forth herein shall be offered for sale to such qualified persons and to Collier County or its designee beginning with the date of issuance of the building permit for each building containing said dwelling units, and continuing for six (6) months after the Certificate of Occupancy for each building containing said dwelling units is issued, after which time any unsold unit may be sold at market rates. Four (4) months after a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a building containing affordable or gap housing, the County Manager or his designee shall be notified in writing by the owner that units remain available for purchase by Collier County. ENVIRONMENTAL Preserve Area Calculation: 8.33 acres (existing vegetation) x 25% = 2.08 acres to be preserved. TRANSPORTATION: 1. Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy, and if warrants dictate, the developer shall construct an additional eastbound left turn lane on Estey Avenue at its intersection with Airport Road. The length of the turn lane is to be determined by Collier County Transportation Staff up to a maximum distance that can be accommodated along the developer's frontage. The length will further be determined given consideration to the project's access location and normal transportation engineering practices. 2. Prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy, the developer shall construct a turnaround within the existing Steeves Avenue Right -of -Way as depicted on the MPUD Master Plan. '1d", ii, li;,n IVi;1,Ige "AJ'Up Pwvi:: (I: July 1. 20 10 Packet Page - 1788 - 6/25/2013 17.G. 3. The developer shall be allowed to use the existing curb cut on Airport Road during the construction of Meridian Village MPUD. Once construction of the development is completed, the developer shall convert the existing curb cut into a traffic controlled right in- right out access point. 4. The maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed uses (both primary and ancillary) may not exceed the summarized PM Peak Hour, two way trips as shown below: a. For a maximum of 120 multi- family residential units (LUC 230), 70 PM Peak Hour, two way trips. b. For a maximum of 480 units of group housing (LUC 254), 143 PM Peak Hour, two way trips. c. For a maximum of 150 Adult day care (LUC 565), 114 PM Peak Hour, two way trips. d. For a maximum 1,150 seat Church (LUC 560), approximately 70 PM Peak Hour two way trips (10% daily traffic). 5. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks, and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer. collier Uanry have no responsibility for - maintenance of any such facilities. ` 6. Relative to permitted CF uses, for services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation as determined by Collier County Staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier County staf Z with staffing and locations(s) as directed by the Collier County Manager or his designee. PROXMTY OF PROPERTY TO NAPLES AIRPORT: The developer shall provide the following to the Naples Airport Authority: 1. An executed Aviation Easement and Release (first five pages), once the MPUD has been approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. A statement within the Project's Condominium or Association Documents that states the following. "The Naples Municipal Airport is located less than one mile to the Northwest of the Condominium, in close proximity to the community. Purchaser's can expect all the usual and common noises and disturbances created by, and incident to, the operation of the Airport". Purchasers shall acknowledge they have read the Condominium or Association Documents by signing a Ietter, which the developer shall send to the Naples Airport Authority. The Condominium or Homeowner's Association shall not have the right to remove this clause at any time from their documents. 3. Future SDP applications shall be forwarded to the Naples Airport Authority for review. 4. No Structures shall be placed inside the Runway Protection Zone, as labeled on the MPUD Master Plan. `•1:�:•irliatt t,`ill:u;� �ai'Up Packet Page -1789- 6/25/2013 17.G. 5. Building Heights will comply with the Part 77 Controlling Surfaces for Naples Airport as shown on Exhibit G. LANDSCAPING: The landscape buffer on the west property line and the south property line that extends east and west of Steeves Avenue shall contain trees with a minimum height of 12 feet spaced no more than 25 feet on center. Existing trees that can be saved within the buffer shall remain if practicable and be counted as buffer trees as allowed in the LDC. Hedges in the enhanced buffer shall be a minimum of ten gallon plants five feet in height, three feet in spread and spaced a maximum four feet on center at planting. filly 1, 201 o Packet Page -1790- I'.u; 16 of 1'1 6/25/2013 W.G. tai: _ _ .. PART 77 CONTROLLING SURFACES FOR NAPLES AIRPORT: ^ - -1 CNNECTf CUT A G Z Meridian Village MPUD Revised; July 1, ?010 Page 17 of 17 Packet Page -1791- STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2010 -28 6/25/2013 17.G. Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 27th day of July, 2010, during Regular Session. .-�, WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 30th day of July, 2010. crib • 4�?�1;, `''`' DWIGHT E. BROCK',g %';.• Clerk of Court' ` a-nW .erk Ex- officio:. to . cl .o "f..f- '. County ConimisSYong:2t �;` � • �`��` '� 'mss By: Ann Jenne j ohn, . Deputy Clerk Packet Page -1792- 6/25/2013 W.G. DE DAVIDSON ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM TO: Fred Reischl, AICP FROM: Tim Hancock, AICP June 3, 2013 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary Notes PUDA PL2013- 0000886: Meridian Village MPUD A Neighborhood Information Meeting for this project was held on Thursday, May 30th, 2013 at the Salvation Army, located at 3170 Estey Ave. The meeting was properly advertised in the Naples Daily News and started at 5:30 pm. A total of 16 property owners attended, please see the attached sign in sheet. In addition, the following individuals were present: Fred Reischl, Senior Planner, Collier County Chris Nind, Director of Development and Community Relations, The Salvation Army Mike Metcalf, Rock Creek Holdings, LLC Tim Hancock opened the meeting and introduced himself, and then briefly mentioned the reason of holding the NIM is to amend the existing zoning by adding a single permitted use. Tim then introduced Fred Reischl with Collier County and Mike Metcalf as the property owner. Tim discussed the history of the property, starting in 1990, with the property being zoned for a commercial shopping center, then discussed the rezone in 2006 when the property was rezoned to allow for 120 multi - family residential units with 20 percent of those units being affordable housing. Tim then discussed the last rezone of the property taking place in 2010 which added "CF" (Community Facility) uses. Tim gave a hand -out to all attendees, which outlined the existing permitted uses for the property and the desire to add "Youth Center" or any other use that is comparable to permitted uses as an allowable use within the PUD. Tim explained the existing uses and accessory uses currently allowed on the site. He explained that the Salvation Army had an interest adding a Youth Center to the property, which would allow for things such as gymnasium, recreational facility and after school programs. Tim asked the attendees if any of them had read about the project in the paper and then explained that there were people interested in donating to the project to make it a reality. 4365 Radio Road, Suite #201 - Naples, Florida 34104 - Phone: 239.434.6060 - Fax: 239.434.6084 www.davidsonenaineerinQ.com Davidson Engineering, Inc. Packet Page -1793- 6/25/2013 W.G. Tim then used exhibits to show the current development plans and project location. He gave the attendees the CCPC hearing date. Tim told the attendees that he or Fred could help with any questions or concerns anyone had, or they could attend the CCPC hearing and express their concerns there. Tim then went over the exhibits again, showing location of development, preserves and wetlands. Tim then asks for any questions: Question #1. How do you access the property? Tim showed the access location on Airport and on Estey using the exhibit. Question #2. What will be behind the home on the East side of Steeves Street? Tim replied that there will be a 15' Type "B" buffer. He explained the trees and shurbs required in the Type B buffer and how over a year's time it would be difficult to see though the vegetation. Question #3. Are you doing a turnaround on Steeves Street? Tim replied that there is a turnaround proposed in the plans to be constructed when the property's development occurs. Question #4. Is there a brick or rock wall proposed? Tim states that only the vegetation buffers are proposed. Question #5. How many children will the facility contain? I heard there is 350 -400 children proposed. Tim responded that the facility is still being designed and that it could be that many. Question #6. How will the children get picked up? Tim replied that most of the children will be from the surrounding neighborhood and will be walking or that parents will be responsible for pick -up. Question #7. You said that there is an in/out access on Airport Road? Tim then showed the 2 access locations on the Exhibit. He explained why both accesses were required by the County. He also explained that it is anticipated that most people that will be using the facility live in the surrounding neighborhood. Question #8. Are there plans to bus in kids to the facility? Packet Page -1794- 6/25/2013 17.G. Chris with the Salvation Army responded that it is more than likely children will be bused to the facility. Tim spoke about the proposed zoning amendment to allow for the "Youth Center" use and how Staff recommended approval. He states the meeting is not meant to discuss what the Salvation Army intends to do but to allow for the Youth Center use. Question #9. Churches typically meet about once a week. You are talking about a school, classrooms and possibly 400 children... Tim replied that this project is not a proposed daycare center. He mentioned that there will be some outdoor play areas and that it is proposed for an after school facility as an extension of the Salvation Army Church. It was then stated that most programs would be held indoors. Tim spoke again about this proposed PUD Amendment just allowing for the use. He explained the number of children allowed in the facility at one time would be a building code issue- not zoning. Question #10. What do you plan around the creek side of the property? And how "deep" is the proposed preserve area./ Tim responded that the preserve area and existing vegetation will be on the creek side and that it varied from 100 -150 feet deep. Chris, with the Salvation Army, then spoke about the adult Senior classes that are possibly proposed during the day and that they Salvation Army would be getting as much use out of the facility has possible. He stated that 300 -400 kids at one time seemed too high of a number at once, but hoped to serve as many as allowable and possible. Question #11. What kind of security is proposed? How will you keep the children from leaving? Chris responded that security is a major concern and priority of the Salvation Army's. He indicated there would be controls. They would know when children went in, came out and only appropriate and approved individuals would be able to sign children out. Tim again went over the Exhibits and proposed Development Plan. Question #12. Traffic congestion on Estey Ave is a concern. Tim replied that the number of trips proposed is equal or less to what is already approved for the site. Tim spoke about the interconnection proposed between the on -site uses. Packet Page -1795- 6/25/2013 17.G. Tim went over the proposed development, speaking about lighting and preserve requirements. He explained the MPUD and the platting process. Question #13. When will the project be constructed? Tim stated that one the zoning was approved, they would go directly into the engineering planning and it would be a minimum of 18 months. Tim closed the meeting by expressing the necessity of the facility for helping surrounding neighborhood children. He let attendees know they can contact him or Fred Reischl for any further questions or concerns. The meeting adjourned at approximately 6:15pm. End of memo. Packet Page -1796- ZJ oz ,Q �LLf TM N O M LO 2 Z ca L C� G 6/25/2013 17.G. Packet Page -1797- 61A st fy) N 1-0) .�. Cu T T N T M T T Ln T O T T N T Packet Page -1797- 6/25/2013 17.G. ORDINANCE NO. 13- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2010 -28, THE MERIDIAN VILLAGE MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO ALLOW AS PERMITTED USES A YOUTH CENTER AND OTHER USES COMPARABLE TO THE PERMITTED USES IN THIS PUD. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD AND ESTEY AVENUE IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 11.681 ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PUDA- PL20130000886) WHEREAS, on July 27, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 10 -28 which established the Meridian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning classification; and WHEREAS, Rock Creek Holdings, LLC represented by Tim Hancock, AICP of Davidson Engineering, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the Meridian Village MPUD. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: Amendment to Exhibit A, Permitted Uses, of Ordinance Number 10 -28, Meridian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. Exhibit A, Permitted Uses: Tract A, to Ordinance Number 10 -28 is hereby amended to add the following permitted principal uses: 5. Youth Centers, (8322), limited to the southerly half of the PUD as shown on the attached Master Concept Plan. 6. An y other principal use and related use that is determined to be comparable to the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals pursuant to the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). SECTION TWO: Amendment to Exhibit C, Master Concept Plan, of Ordinance Number 10 -28, Meridian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. Exhibit C, Master Concept Plan, to Ordinance Number 10 -28 is hereby amended to show the area where Youth Centers may be placed, as shown on the attached Master Concept Plan. Meridian Village MPUD 1 of 3 PUDA- PL20130000886 -REV 6/06/13 Rev. 6/06/13 Words stFUsk thF9w # are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Page -1798- 6/25/2013 17.G. SECTION THREE: Amendment to Transportation Section of Exhibit F, Development Commitments, of Ordinance Number 14 -28, Meridian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. The Transportation Section of Exhibit F, Development Commitments, to Ordinance Number 10 -28 is hereby amended to read as follows: TRANSPORTATION: * * * * * * * * * ** 4. The maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed uses (both primary and ancillary) may not exceed the summarized PM Peak Hour, two way trips as shown below: a. For a maximum of 120 multi - family residential units (LUC 230), 70 PM Peak Hour, two way trips, or b. For a maximum of 480 units of group housing (LUC 254), 143 PM Peak Hour, two way trips, or c. For a maximum of 150 Adult day care (LUC 565), 114 PM Peak Hour, two way trips, or d. Fora maximum 1,150 seat Church (LUC 560), approximately 70 PM Peak Hour two way trips (10% daily traffic), or e. For all uses in the aggregate, 143 PM Peak Hour two way trips. SECTION FOUR: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super - majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2013. ATTEST DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi Ashton -Cicko Managing Assistant County attorney Un BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA GEORGIA A. HILLER, ESQ. Chairwoman Meridian Village MPUD 2 of 3 PUDA- PL20130000886 -REV 6106113 Rev. 6/06113 Words stFuGk thmuo are deleted, words underlined are added. Packet Page -1799- Attachment: Exhibit C — Master Concept Plan (revi n limited area for Youth Center Use) CP \13- CPS - 01220 \19 11'� �. Meridian Village MPUD 3 of 3 PUDA- PL20130000886 -REV 6/06/13 Rev. 6/06/13 Words stFuGk-#14Feagh are deleted; words underlined are added. Packet Page -1800- N W Z Z Z QZ IL J z z W 0 w a j:D }0} ggLL 55� M20 N _ ° C7Za zZ- o�� wCL CL it 0 a. 0 a 0 LL N p g w LL O N O O 0 O 8 W jn iOD 0p W LL S O = U- o 222 W J z_ZZ_ H mi222 Q D U) W Q2Q J W N W t.. Z J W Z W 0 6/25/2013 W.G. a r- o �o F N o r o° h N N O aD O LL O C m m •' O 0 m ° LU LO w / L _ _ — — __"— _ _ _ _ -- — — — / /� _� J X g�gR e o` �� W W? G W O b 9 J :9NINI fir? 1 W N III Q I N C —rz It W W N N (O Qp n r o c I a> 0 c ' � wa Z/o I lz 5c W N I z a? ita� m J W (A Wes„ z ZQ �za i S6 a ors 10 z b n v b — qqL J Q z pro LL <° s s ot a zL a w w N a Lwu C) OY 3SYd'L %OOS lY1d W -_L CL U Q WJ02i LW 'F*- ° Iu� a 60 ' m w cc a \ OU w a? �' d w D �Q LLB L- y < U Q i0 N NUOIBA30 3OYTM N"GrdBM AS mionLUSN003S O1 ONnowwwtuu U w Z LLLL�II 0 K J \ ° z s !Q- ° \� z5w 02m Ix Z� N W t.. Z J W Z W 0 / M 6/25/2013 W.G. y z mo - - -- -------------------- CW�S>� U 90 � CU Wz Ch 5 a CL 5�.. lasn aNl �.iOi d v Z� wOE ° LU LO w / L _ _ — — __"— _ _ _ _ -- — — — / /� _� J X g�gR vain a o` �� W W? G W O b 9 J :9NINI fir? 1 W I Z LL III Q I Z z0 0 C —rz It W W N .p <U a —° ►z rz - eL I a> 0 ' � wa Z/o I lz 5c W N I z a? ita� m J W (A Wes„ z ZQ �za i / M J J rA r 2 m8 0 O W axe U Y O a Eo . " m Z °a` OR 00 - - -- -------------------- CW�S>� 90 � CU Wz =zoms ao 5�.. lasn aNl i /T7102i3WW00 W I z Z a i I 03pOZldWl�35(1 ONtlI I O g V ( I 4 O 'JNINOZ �.iOi d v Z� wOE / L _ _ — — __"— _ _ _ _ -- — — — / /� _� J X oanoadw g ," 3NNOJ / avow ores ).-INO w w3Lr3cva ,�. sL o` �� W NlnilSi"„ a3 dOW W > b 9 J :9NINI J J rA r 2 m8 0 O W axe U Y O a r- - - -- -------------------- - - - --r lasn aNl I oanoadw W > b 9 J :9NINI fir? 1 I Z LL III I C —rz ►z rz - eL I a> 0 ' � \� �� I lz I z a? z S6 10 z b n v b — qqL z pro I$ _a L--- --- -L - - -J s s ot a zL n t OY 3SYd'L %OOS lY1d W -_L J3�YtllJ31H33tlJ WJ02i — `� Iu� — —• \ AYM'd0'Li9Rl a? �' g SnN3AY S3A33ZDNUS03 NINLM w I > W Z NUOIBA30 3OYTM N"GrdBM AS mionLUSN003S O1 ONnowwwtuu < z LU 4 K ri� 5 \ ° z 6 =0 \� z5w 02m Z� I I N� = rc< I j ] CO ( Packet Page -1801- I I I L J J J rA r 2 m8 0 O W axe U Y O a 24D Wednesday, June 5,2013* NAPLES DAILY•NEWS NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, June 25, 2013, in the Boardroom, 3rd .Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enact- ment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2010 -28, THE MERIDIAN VIL- LAGE MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO ALLOW AS PERMITTED USES A YOUTH CENTER AND OTHER USES COMPARABLE TO THE PERMITTED USES IN THIS PUD. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTER- SECTION OF AIRPORT- PULLING ROAD AND ESTEY AVENUE IN SECTION 2, TOWN- SHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 11.68 +/• ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PUDA- PL20130000886) Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda hem must register with the County administrator Prior to presentation of the agenda hem to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of an in- clividual to by the behalf of an spokesperson for aigroup or organizationencouraged. y belallotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to par- ticipate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact.the Collier County Facilities Management De art- 252 -8380. Tamiami he hearing impaired Florida available County Commissioners' Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA GEORGIA A. HILLER, ESQ., CHAIRWOMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) June S. 2013 Nn 'Igg7nR� F Packet Page -1802- 6/25/2013 17.G.