Agenda 05/13/2013 Item #17D5/14/2013 17.D.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve two proposed Land Development Code amendments to section
5.05.08. The first is to subsection 5.05.08 C.9 to allow freestanding buildings and buildings located
on outparcels within a Planned Unit Development or a common ownership development to have
one secondary fagade. Further, to amend subsection 5.05.08 F, to allow buildings within Planned
Unit Developments to seek an architectural deviation through the Architectural Deviations and
Alternate Compliance process identified within the Land Development Code.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board of County Commissioners (Board). approval for two proposed
Land Development Code (LDC) amendments to section 5.05.08. First, to subsection 5.05.08 C.9
to allow freestanding buildings and buildings located on outparcels within a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) or a common ownership development to have one secondary fagade. This
would replace the current requirement that all facades meet the primary fagade standards.
Second, to amend subsection 5.05.08 F, to allow buildings within Planned Unit Developments to
seek an architectural deviation through the Architectural Deviations and Alternate Compliance
process identified within the Land Development Code.
CONSIDERATIONS: This amendment was presented to the Collier County Planning
Commission during the 2012 LDC Amendment Cycle. At that time, the Planning Commission
recommended the two amendments, to subsection 5.05.08 C.9 and 5.05.08 F, be reviewed by the
Architectural Review Committee which had prepared the current architectural provisions
established in LDC section 5.05.08.
Following Board direction on February 26, 2013 to bring an amendment forward to allow
buildings within a PUD the option to request an architectural deviation, this amendment was
reviewed and approved by the former available members of the Architectural Review
Committee. The members also recommended that both the amendments, the creation of the
secondary facade and expansion of the architectural deviation process, be presented for adoption
to the Board. Subsequently, the amendment has been reviewed and unanimously approved by the
Development Services Advisory Committee on April 3, 2013 and unanimously approved 7 -0 by
the Planning Commission on April 4, 2013. The Planning Commission had only minor
comments regarding formatting.
The proposed amendment to subsection 5.05.08 C.9 is designed to create a secondary facade
provision, i.e. allow for a "back" to a building, which will provide a more functional use of space
for certain building types, such as a restaurant. The secondary fagade will face the interior of the
development and will continue to meet the standards required for all facades, identified in LDC
section 5.05.08 C.5.c. This section provides a list of building design treatments. The secondary
facade will be required to have at least four treatments. For instance, an architect may choose the
following four design features for a secondary facade: place emphasis on the building base,
include expressed or exposed structural elements, incorporate ornamental and structural details,
and utilize cornices in the design.
Packet Page -4410-
5/14/2013 17.D.
A secondary fagade may also be used as a service area. In addition to the option of utilizing
primary fagade elements, a service area is required to meet the design requirements of LDC
section 5.05.08 E.3. This section provides specific design features to diminish the visual and
acoustic impacts of a service area, such as providing screening from the area and enclosures for
trash receptacles. The combination of the proposed secondary facade requirements and the
service area standards will allow for a practical approach to the "back" of a building.
The proposed amendment to subsection 5.05.08 F will allow all buildings to utilize the County's
Deviations and Alternate Compliance administrative process. Currently, buildings constructed
within a PUD do not have a means to seek an architectural deviation from the LDC. The
Alternate Compliance process provides a method for a unique architectural design while still
meeting the intent of the LDC.
FISCAL EWPACT: The amendments will provide fiscal benefits to developers and architects.
The secondary fagade may cost less than the current requirements.
The amendment to the Architectural Deviations and Alternate Compliance process in the LDC
will provide a greater number of buildings the opportunity to apply for an alternative design. The
change will impact projects that have specific architectural requirements or design treatments for
operational or functional purposes.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is ready for Board consideration and approval. An
affirmative vote of four is needed for Board approval. HFAC
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The decision of the Board will have no effect on the
Growth Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board provides approval of the proposed LDC amendments
to subsection 5.05.08 C.9 and 5.05.08 F. The amendment to 5.05.08 C.9 will allow freestanding
buildings and buildings located on outparcels within a Planned Unit Development (PUD) or a
common ownership development to have one secondary fagade. The amendment to 5.05.08 F
will allow buildings within a PUD to seek an architectural deviation through the Architectural
Deviations and Alternate Compliance process identified within the LDC.
Prepared by: Caroline Cilek, Senior Planner, Operations and Regulatory Management.
Attachments: Attachment 1: The proposed LDC amendment.
Attachment 2: The proposed draft Ordinance.
Packet Page -4411-
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 17.17.D.
5/14/2013 W.D.
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve two proposed Land Development Code
amendments to section 5.05.08. The first is to subsection 5.05.08 C.9 to allow freestanding
buildings and buildings located on outparcels within a Planned Unit Development or a common
ownership development to have one secondary fagade. Further, to amend subsection 5.05.08
F, to allow buildings within Planned Unit Developments to seek an architectural deviation
through the Architectural Deviations and Alternate Compliance process identified within the
Land Development Code.
Meeting Date: 5/14/2013
Prepared By
Name: CilekCaroline
Title: Sr. Planner, Operations and Regulatory Management
4/11/2013 2:03:07 PM
Submitted by
Title: Sr. Planner, Operations and Regulatory Management
Name: CilekCaroline
4/11/2013 2:03:09 PM
Approved By
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, GMD P &R
Date: 4/16/2013 3:26:02 PM
Name: BosiMichael
Title: Manager - Planning,Comprehensive Planning
Date: 4/17/2013 10:32:13 AM
Name: FrenchJames
Title: Manager - CDES Operations,Operations & Regulatory
Date: 4/24/2013 3:03:26 PM
Packet Page -4412-
Name: MarcellaJeanne
5/14/2013 17.D.
Title: Executive Secretary,Transportation Planning
Date: 5/1/2013 8:34:14 AM
Name: AshtonHeidi
Title: Section Chief/Land Use- Transportation,County Attor
Date: 5/6/2013 2:34:39 PM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Director -Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs,CMO
Date: 5/6/2013 3:34:20 PM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney
Date: 5/6/2013 4:24:19 PM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Director -Corp Financial and Mgmt Svs,CMO
Date: 5/6/2013 4:59:32 PM
Packet Page -4413-
5/14/2013 17.D.
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Te)d 6t9k8th.9Ugh iF% FM..I tAW to h...Jelnte.d
Bold text indicates a defined tern
LDC Amendment Request
ORIGIN: Board of County Commissioners
AUTHOR: Carolina Valera, Principal Planner, Growth Management Division
DEPARTMENT: Growth Management Division
AMENDMENT CYCLE: Out of Cycle LDC Amendment
LDC SECTION(S): 5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Standards
CHANGES: To amend subsection 5.05.08 C.9 to allow freestanding buildings and buildings
located on outparcels within a Planned Unit Development (PUD) or a common ownership
development to have one secondary facade, i.e. the "back" of the building. This would replace
the current requirement that all fagades meet primary facade standards.
Further, to amend subsection 5.05.08 F, which outlines the Deviations and Alternate Compliance
process, to include buildings within a PUD. The process is currently limited to buildings that are
located in other zoning districts.
REASON: Currently, freestanding buildings and buildings located on outparcels within a PUD
or common ownership development are required to meet primary facade requirements for each
building face. This includes detailing such as windows, covered entryways, covered walkways,
and trellises.
The proposed amendment to subsection 5.05.08 C.9 is designed to create a secondary facade
provision, i.e. allow for a "back" to a building, which will provide a more functional use of space
for certain building types, such as a restaurant. The secondary facade will face the interior of the
development and will continue to meet the standards required for all fagades, identified in LDC
section 5.05.08 C.5.c. This section provides a list of building design treatments. The secondary
facade will be required to have at least four treatments. For instance, an architect may choose the
following four design features for a secondary facade: place emphasis on the building base,
include expressed or exposed structural elements, incorporate ornamental and structural details,
and utilize cornices in the design.
A secondary facade may also be used as a service area. In addition to the option of utilizing
primary facade elements, a service area is required to meet the design requirements of LDC
section 5.05.08 E.3. This section provides specific design features to diminish the visual and
acoustic impacts of a service area, such as providing screening from the area and enclosures for
trash receptacles. The combination of the proposed secondary facade requirements and the
service area standards will allow for a practical approach to the "back" of a building.
The proposed amendment to subsection 5.05.08 F will allow all buildings to utilize the County's
Deviations and Alternate Compliance administrative process. Currently, buildings constructed
within a PUD do not have a means to seek an architectural deviation from the LDC. The
Alternate Compliance process provides a method for a unique architectural design while still
meeting the intent of the LDC.
CAProgram Files\Neevia.Com0ocument Converter \temp\2396617.docx4/11/2013 2:24 PM
Packet Page -4414-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
5/14/2013 17.D.
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Teal .N.ikethm, wi;Fent tek4 t he deleted
Bold text indicates a defined term
FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS: The amendments will provide fiscal benefits to
developers and architects. The secondary facade may cost less than the current requirements.
The amendment to the Architectural Deviations and Alternate Compliance process in the LDC
will provide a greater number of buildings the opportunity to apply for an alternative design. The
change will impact projects that have specific architectural requirements or design treatments for
operational or functional purposes.
County Staff does not anticipate any fiscal or operational impacts to the County.
RELATED CODES OR REGULATIONS: None.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: None.
OTHER NOTESIVERSION DATE: This amendment was reviewed and unanimously
approved by available members of the former Architectural Review Committee on Friday,
March 1, 2013. The Committee consists of local architects who assisted with the conception of
the current architectural standards identified in LDC section 5.05.08 in 2004. The Committee
reconvened following direction from the Planning Commission and the Board of County
Commissioners during the 2012 LDC Amendment Cycle to review LDC section 5.05.08 in its
entirety. Future LDC amendments to this section will be brought forward at a later date.
The amendment was presented and unanimously approved by the Development Services
Advisory Committee on April 3, 2013 and by the Planning Commission on April 4, 2013. No
substantive changes were recommended.
Prepared by Caroline Cilek, Senior Planner on March 6, 2013, March 15, 2013, Mach 26, 2013,
March 27, 2013, April 5, 2013.
Amend the LDC as follows:
5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Standards
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
C. Building design standards.
9. Outparcels and freestanding buildings within a PUD and common ownership
developments.
a. Purpose and intent. To provide unified architectural design and site
planning for all on -site structures, and to provide for safe and convenient
vehicular and pedestrian access and movement within the site.
b. Facades standards. All facades must meet the requirements of 5.05.08
C.5. Project standards.
i. Primary facades. All exterior facades of freestanding structures,
including structures located on outparcels, are considered
primary facades, and must meet the requirements of this Ssection
with respect to the architectural design treatment for primary
facades - 9section 5.05.08 C.2.
except for those facades considered secondary facades.
2
C: \Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp\2396617.docx4 /11/2013 2:24 PM
Packet Page -4415-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1.9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
5/14/2013 17. D.
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Bold text indicates a defined term
ii. Secondary facades. One facade of a freestanding structure.
including structures located on outparcels, that is internal to the
site and that does not abut or face public or private streets
adiacent to the development. Outparcels and freestanding
buildings are allowed one secondary facade.
C. Design standards. The design for freestanding buildings must employ
architectural, site and landscaping design elements integrated with, and
common to those used on the primary structure and its site. These
common design elements must include colors, building materials, and
landscaping associated with the main structure. All freestanding
buildings must provide for vehicular and pedestrian inter - connection
between adjacent outparcels or freestanding sites and r the primary
structure.
d. Primary fagade standards. The following design features are in addition
to the list of requirement options to meet §ion 5.05.08 C.2. Primary
facade standards:
i. Walls expanding the design features of the building, not less than
7 feet high, creating a courtyard not less than 12 feet from the
building and length of no less than 60y6 ep rcent of the length of
the associated fagade. The courtyard may be gated and able to
be secured from exterior public access. Grilled openings are
allowed if courtyard is landscaped. Opening depths or wall
terminations must be a minimum of 12 inches deep. If the
courtyard contains service or utility equipment, the height and
design must prevent view from the exterior. Courtyard walls are
not to be considered fences.
ii. Trellis or latticework used as a support for climbing plants may
count as window area equal to the plant coverage area.
F. Deviations and Alternate Compliance. The following alternative compliance process is
established to allow deviations from the requirements of this §ion as approved by
the County Manager or Ne designee.
1. Review and approval procedure. Upon request by the applicant, the County
Manager or 4is designee may administratively approve a Site and Development
Plan application that includes an alternative architectural design and site
development plan that may be substituted in whole or in part for a plan meeting
the standards of §ion 5.05.08. Approved deviations are allowed only as to
the specific design and plan reviewed. Any modification to an approved design
shall necessitate re- review and approval by the County Manager or WS designee.
2. Review criteria. In approving an alternative plan, the County Manager or #is
designee must find that the proposed alternative plan accomplishes the purpose
and intent of this §ion in the same manner as the provisions would. If the
plan is approved through this provision, the Site Development Plan approval
letter shall specifically note the deviations and the basis for their approval.
3. Submittal requirements. In addition to the base submittal requirements,
applicants must provide the following:
a. Architectural design plan and /or site development plan clearly labeled as
an "Alternative Architectural Design Standards Plan ". This plan must
identify the section numbers from this §ion from which the deviation
is being requested.
b. A narrative statement that specifically identifies all standards of §ion
5.05.08 from which the deviations are requested, and the justification for
3
C:\Program Files\Neevia.Corn0ocument Converter \temp\2396617.docx4/11/2013 2:24 PM
Packet Page -4416-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
5/14/2013 17.D.
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Bold text indicates a defined term
the request. This statement must include a description of how the
alternative plan accomplishes the purpose and intent of this ,§ion,
without specifically complying with those standards identified.
4. Applicability.
a. The following types of buildings and uses qualify for an administrative
determination of deviations from Ssection 5.05.08- development
standards:
i. Assembly,
ii. Educational,
iii. Institutional,
iv. Mixed use buildings (such as commercial /residential /office), and
V. Any other non - commercial building, or use, that is not listed under
,§ion 5.05.08 D. Design standards for specific building types
of this ,§ion, and due to its function, has specific requirements
making meeting ,§ion 5.05.08: standards unfeasible.
vi. Buildings located on property with a commercial zoning
designation when submitted for Site Development Plan review eR
.,r after him- wembe. 10, 2 except for the following:
a) Buildings lesated 91; OUtpaFeels, fFeesta•,r,azd"r;g (i;v,T
a_#-an-hed multiple eF individual) buildings IeGated on
prepeFty with ,a P UITaening desiglaatielct, er �'r le
buildings developed wndeF a unified, sommel; development
aM Buildings with a gross building area of 10,000 square feet
or more on the ground floor.
Mf4 Multi -story buildings with a total gross building area of
20,000 square feet or more.
c)d) Project sites with more than one building where the
aggregate gross building area is 20,000 square feet or
more. Individual buildings within a project site that have
been previously granted deviations where additional
development causes an aggregation of building area
20,000 square feet or greater, must bring existing
buildings up to the requirements of 5.05.08.
b. The deviation process is also applicable to the specific requirements
listed under the following sections:
i. Section 5.05.08 13.3. Renovations and redevelopment.
ii. Section 5.05.08 6.4. Abandonment or discontinuance of use.
iii. Sections 5.05.08 D.2.d. for Self - storage buildings.
4
C:\Program Files \Neevia.CornMocument Converter \temp \2396617.docx4 /11/2013 2:24 PM
Packet Page -4417-
5/14/201,3 17.D.
ORDINANCE NO. 13 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER
0441, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND
REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE,
ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,
MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: CHAPTER
FIVE — SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS, INCLUDING SECTION 5.05.08
ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN STANDARDS, TO ALLOW
OUTPARCELS AND FREESTANDING BUILDINGS WITHIN A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AN EXCEPTION TO THE
PRIMARY FA9ADE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE "BACK" OF THE
BUILDING, AND TO ALLOW PODS WITH A COMMERCIAL
COMPONENT TO USE THE ALTERNATIVE ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW PROCESS; SECTION TWO, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY;
SECTION THREE, INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND SECTION FOUR, EFFECTIVE DATE.
Recitals
WHEREAS, on October 30, 1991, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners
adopted Ordinance No. 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code (hereinafter LDC),
which was subsequently amended; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) on June 22,
2004, adopted Ordinance No. 04-41, which repealed and superseded Ordinance No. 91 -102, as
amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which had an effective date of October
18, 2004; and
WHEREAS, the LDC may not be amended more than two times in each calendar year
unless additional amendment cycles are approved by the Collier County Board of
Commissioners pursuant to Section 10.02.09 A. of the LDC; and
WHEREAS, this amendment to the LDC is the first amendment for the calendar year
2013; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 1997, the Board adopted Resolution 97 -177 establishing local
requirements and procedures for amending the LDC; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of Resolution 97 -177 have been met; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, in a manner prescribed by law, did
hold an advertised public hearing on the date noted herein, and did take action concerning this
amendment to the LDC; and
Page 1 of 5
Words stmt are deleted, words underlined are added
Packet Page -4418-
5/14/2013 17.D.
WHEREAS, the subject amendments to the LDC are hereby determined by this Board to
be consistent with and to implement the Collier County Growth Management Plan as required
by Subsections 163.3194 (1) and 163.3202 (1), Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted in compliance with and pursuant to the
Community Planning Act (F.S. § 163.3161 etseq.), and F.S. § 125.01(1)(t) and (1)(w); and
WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted pursuant to the constitutional and home rule
powers of Fla. Const. Art. VIII, § 1(g); and
WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of the law have
otherwise been met.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County, Florida, that:
SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 5.05.08 ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE
DESIGN STANDARDS
Section 5.05.08, Architectural and Site Design Standards, of Ordinance 04-41, as amended, the
Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended to read as follows:
5.05.08 Architectural and Site Design Standards
* * * * w a r r • t t w �
C. Building design standards.
9. Outparcels and freestanding buildings within a PUD and common ownership
developments.
a. Purpose and intent. To provide unified architectural design and site planning for
all on -site structures, and to provide for safe and convenient vehicular and
pedestrian access and movement within the site.
b. Facades standards. All facades must meet the reauirements of 5.05.08.C.5.
Proiect standards.
i. Primary facades. All exterior facades of freestanding structures,
including structures located on outparcels, are considered primary
facades; and must meet the requirements of this sSection with respect to
the architectural design treatment for primary facades - sSection 5.05.08
C.2. except for those facades considered
secondary facades.
ii. Secondary facades. One facade of a freestandina structure includina
structures located on ouWarcels. that is internal to the site and that
does not abut or face public or private streets adiacent to the
development. Outparcels and freestandina buildings are allowed one
secondary facade.
Page 2 of 5
Words stmekdwe are deleted, words underlined are added
Packet Page -4419-
5/14/2013 17.D.
C. Design standards. The design for freestanding buildings must employ
architectural, site and landscaping design elements integrated with, and common
to those used on the primary structure and its site. These common design
elements must include colors, building materials, and landscaping associated
with the main structure. All freestanding buildings must provide for vehicular
and pedestrian inter- connection between adjacent outparcels or freestanding
sites and the primary structure.
d. Primary fagade standards. The following design features are in addition to the list
of requirement options to meet section 5.05.08 C.2. Primary fagade standards:
L Walls expanding the design features of the building, not less than 7 feet
high, cr=ating a courtyard not less than 12 feet from the building and
length of no less than 60% percent of the length of the associated
fagade. The courtyard may be gated and able to be secured from exterior
public access. Grilled openings are allowed if courtyard is landscaped.
Opening depths or wall terminations must be a minimum of 12 inches
deep. If the courtyard contains service or utility equipment, the height and
design must prevent view from the exterior. Courtyard walls are not to be
considered fences.
ii. Trellis or latticework used as a support for climbing plants may count as
window area equal to the plant coverage area.
F. Deviations and Alternate Compliance. The following alternative compliance process is
established to allow deviations from the requirements of this §ion as approved by
the County Manager or laic designee.
1. Review and approval procedure. Upon request by the applicant, the County
Manager or laic designee may administratively approve a Site and Development
Plan application that includes an alternative architectural design and site
development plan that may be substituted in whole or in part for a plan meeting
the standards of Ssection 5.05.08. Approved deviations are allowed only as to
the speck design and plan reviewed. Any modification to an approved design
shall necessitate re- review and approval by the County Manager or laic designee.
2. Review criteria. In approving an alternative plan, the County Manager or #is
designee must find that the proposed alternative plan accomplishes the purpose
and intent of this §ion in the same manner as the provisions would. If the
plan is approved through this provision, the Site Development Plan approval
letter shall specifically note the deviations and the basis for their approval.
3. Submittal requirements. In addition to the base submittal requirements,
applicants must provide the following:
a. Architectural design plan and/or site development plan clearly labeled as
an "Alternative Architectural Design Standards Plan ". This plan must
identify the section numbers from this Ssection from which the deviation
is being requested.
b. A narrative statement that specifically identifies all standards of §ion
5.05.08 from which the deviations are requested, and the justification for
the request. This statement must include a description of how the
alternative plan accomplishes the purpose and intent of this §ion,
without specifically complying with those standards identified.
4. Applicability.
a. The following types of buildings and uses qualify for an administrative
�-. determination of deviations from Ssection 5.05.08- development
standards:
Page 3 of 5
Words sav& desuo are deleted, words underlined are added
Packet Page -4420-
SECTION TWO:
5/14/2013 17.D.
i. Assembly,
ii. Educational,
iii. Institutional,
iv. Mixed use buildings (such as commercial/residential /office), and
V. Any other non - commercial building, or use, that is not listed under
Ssection 5.05.08 D. Design standards for specific building types of
this §ion, and due to its function, has speck requirements
making meeting §ion 5.05.08: standards unfeasible.
vi. Buildings located on property with a commercial zoning
designation when submitted for Site Development Plan review erg
Or —8 "M NWHIM199F 10, , except for the following:
a%) Buildings with a gross building area of 10,000 square feet
or more on the ground floor.
Multi -story buildings with a total gross building area of
20,000 square feet or more.
c* Project sites with more than one building where the
aggregate gross building area is 20,000 square feet or
more. Individual buildings within a project site that have
been previously granted deviations where additional
development causes an aggregation of building area
20,000 square feet or greater, must bring existing
buildings up to the requirements of 5.05.08.
CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other
applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding Section not affect the validity of
the remaining portion.
SECTION THREE: INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Land
Development Code of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be
renumbered or re- lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to
"section," "article," or any other appropriate word.
Page 4 of 5
Words soek are deleted, words and re l ned are added
Packet Page -4421-
5/14/2013 17.D.
SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State,
Tallahassee, Florida.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida, this day of , 2013.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By:
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
Heidi Ashton - Cicko, Esquire
Managing Assistant County Attorney
04 -CMD- 01077/1043
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
GEORGIA A. HILLER, ESQ., Chairwoman
Page 5 of 5
Words s#ask dweuo are deleted, words underlined are added
Packet Page -4422-
i
5/14/2013 17.D.
PTMT`W- 7jn rr L- 013
DTTflT T/� 171�.Tr�,.
May 14, 2
COLLIER COUNTY, BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
NOTICE .OF'LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE .CHANGE
Notice Is hereby given that on Tuesday, May `14, 2013, in the Board of County
Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Building "F, Collier County Government
Center, 3299 Tamfami Trail Fast, Naples, Florida 34112, the Coiner County, Board
of County Commissioners will consider amendments to the Collier County Land,.
Development Code. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. Th e title of the proposed
ordinance is as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER '
COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED,
THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, , WHICH INCLUDES
THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED
AREA OF COLLIER - COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE,
ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, MORE
SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: CHAPTER FIVE - SUPPLEMENTAL
STANDARDS, INCLUDING SECTION 5.05.08 ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN
STANDARDS, TO ALLOW OUTPARCELS AND FREESTANDING, BUILDINGS
WITHIN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AN EXCEPTION TO THE
PRIMARY FA¢ADE REOUIREMENTS FOR THE. 'BACK" OF THE BUILDING,
AND TO ALLOW PUDS WITH A COMMERCIAL COMPONENT TO USE THE
ALTERNATIVE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PROCESS; SECTION TWO, CONFLICT
AND SEVERABIUTY ;SECTION THREE, INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY .
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND SECTION FOUR, EFFECTIVE DATE.
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed.
ordinance . are available for public inspection In the Zoning and Land Development
Review Section, - Growth Management Division, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples,
Florida, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Furthermore, materials will be made .available for inspection at the Collier County
Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Suite 401, LCollier County Government Center, East,
Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing,
If a person decides to appeal any decision .made„ by the Collier C*U
*L Board of
County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered afsuch meeting. orF.
hearing, he will need 'a record of the proceedings, and fo'r such purpose he may need .a
to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is.made,'which record`includes`:; ":
the testimony and evidence.upon which the appeal is to be'°based
If you are a person -with a disability, who needs ,any accommodation in order to, 1 .11 participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to 'you ;
:to the provision':
of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier .County Facilities Management
Department, at 3335 assistance..
Trail East; Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112 =5356, (239) 252-
8380, at least:two days prior to the meeting:;Assisted listening devices for the hearing
IM
paired are available in the Board of County Commissioner's Office.
Collier. County Board of County Commissioners
Collier County; Fiorida.
Georgia A. Hiller, ESQ., Chairwoman
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Ann Jennejohn
Deputy Clerk (SEAL)
No. 231195025
Mav �rn6 '
Packet Page -4423-
a.
d
m
C1
: .
. cn�
a
N
O
W
V
z
D'
r
M
v
a
r
z
M
-: