CAC Agenda 04/12/2018 Apri112, 2018
Meeting Agenda and Notice
COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC)
THURSDAY,APRIL 12, 2018 - 1:00 P.M.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS
THIRD FLOOR, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES
• Sunshine Law on Agenda Questions
• 2018 CAC MEETING DATES
I. Call to Order
II. Pledge of Allegiance
III. Roll Call
W. Changes and Approval of Agenda
V. Public Comments
VI.Approval of CAC Minutes
1. February 16, 2018 Minutes
VII. Staff Reports
1. Expanded Revenue Report
VIII. New Business
1. Biological Monitoring
Proposal-CSA
2. Wiggins/Doctors Passes Turbidity Monitoring
* Change Order No. 1
3. Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 14C01
* Change Order
4. Clam Pass Dredging and Beach Park Renourishment
5. Resiliency Request for Professional Services
6. FEMA Storm Report/Update Hurricane Irma
* Pages 1-71
* Pages 72-142
7. FDEP Potential Grant with Respect to State Budget
* 2018 Beachwatch Legislative Session Wrap-Up.
* Beach Restoration and Nourishment Projects
8. Collier County Beach Customary Use
* Public Access to Private Beaches to be Affected by New Florida Law-Article
* Bill Requiring Courts to Decide Public Access to Private Beaches Heads to Gov. Rick Scott's Desk-Article
9. Project Update
-Collier Creek Dredging
-Doctor Pass Erosion Control Structure
- Dredging Wiggins and Doctors Passes
-Central Marco Beach Grading
- Collier Creek Modeling
IX. Old Business
X.Announcements
XI. Committee Member Discussion
XII. Next Meeting Date/Location
May 10, 2018 Government Center, 3rd Floor
XIII.Adjournment
All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in
writing,to the board prior to the meeting if applicable.
For more information,please contact Gail D. Hambright at(239) 252-2966.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you
are entitled, at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities
Management Department located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380.
Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time.
Collier County Ordinance No. 99-22 requires that all lobbyists shall,before engaging in any lobbying activities
(including,but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners)before the Board of County
Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records
Department.
1
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEE MEETING
Naples, Florida, February 16, 2018
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, in and for
the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 12:30 P.M. in
REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building “F”, 3rd Floor, Collier County
Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Robert Brown
VICE CHAIRMAN: Debbie Roddy
Linda Penniman
Steve Koziar
Thomas McCann
Jim Burke (Excused)
Robert Raymond (Excused)
Joseph Burke
Dave Trecker
ALSO PRESENT: Gary McAlpin, Manager, Coastal Zone Management
Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney
Gail Hambright, Accountant
Stephanie Molloy, City of Naples
CAC April 12, 2018
Approval of CAC Minutes
1 of 6
2
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the video recording
from the Collier County Communications and Customer Relations Department or view online.
I. Call to Order
Chairman Brown called the meeting to order at 12:30pm.
II. Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
III. Roll Call
Roll call was taken and a quorum was established.
IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda
Mr. McCann moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Koziar. Carried unanimously 7 - 0.
V. Public Comments
None
VI. Approval of CAC Minutes
1. December 14, 2017
Ms. Penniman moved to approve the minutes of the December 14, 2017 as submitted. Second by
Mr. Trecker. Carried unanimously 7 – 0.
VII. Staff Reports
1. Expanded Revenue Report
The Committee reviewed the “Collier County Tourist Tax Revenue FY 18 TDC Revenue Report”
dated through January 31, 2018.
Mr. McCann moved to accept the Report. Second by Ms. Penniman. Carried unanimously 7 –
0.
VIII. New Business
1. RFP 17-7188 Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring
* 17-7188 Solicitation
* 17-7188 CSA Proposal
* 17-7188 Final Ranking
* 17-7188 Notice of Recommended Award
Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary “Recommendation to approve the ranked list of
designed professionals pursuant to RFP No. 17-7188, “Professional Services for Nearshore
Hardbottom Monitoring,” and authorize staff to negotiate a contract with the top ranked firm CSA
Ocean Sciences, Inc. for subsequent Board of County Commissioners approval; or, if contract
negotiations are unsuccessful, to authorize staff to commence contract negotiations with the
second ranked proposer, APTIM Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., and make a finding that
this item promotes tourism (Project No. 90033)” dated February 16, 2018 for consideration. He
noted:
• The work is required under the auspices of the Florida Department of Environmental and
US Army Corps of Engineers permits issued to the County.
CAC April 12, 2018
Approval of CAC Minutes
2 of 6
3
• The scope of work is proposed over a 5 year time frame with this year’s work to be
completed by September 30, 2018.
• Two firms responded to the request for bid and the contractor has been recommended by
the Selection Committee composed of County environmental professionals.
Ms. Penniman moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the ranked
list of designed professionals pursuant to RFP No. 17-7188, “Professional Services for
Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring,” and authorize staff to negotiate a contract with the top
ranked firm CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. for subsequent Board of County Commissioners
approval; or, if contract negotiations are unsuccessful, to authorize staff to commence contract
negotiations with the second ranked proposer, APTIM Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.,
and finds the item promotes tourism (Project No. 90033). Second by Mr. McCann. Carried
unanimously 7 – 0.
2. Emergency Dredging Collier Creek by Brance Diversified, Inc.
* 18-7283 Agreement
* Bid Tabulations
* Collier Creek Bid Recommendation
* Collier Creek Recommended Award
Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary “Recommendation to ratify the County
Manager's approval of Contract No.: 18-7283 with Brance Diversified, Inc. for the emergency
dredging of Collier Creek for a not-to-exceed price of $569,069 and make a finding that this item
promotes tourism (Project No. 50154)” dated February 16, 2018 for consideration. He noted:
• The work involves dredging of Collier Creek to remediate damages caused by Hurricane
Irma.
• The dredging was previously approved by the Tourist Development Council on December
8, 2017 and Coastal Advisory Committee on December 14, 2017.
• The Board of County Commissioners declared the dredging an “emergency” at their
December 12, 2017 meeting.
• Five vendors submitted bids for the work with three determined to be qualified.
• The bid accepted was substantially less than the other two, however Staff’s investigation
revealed the contractor understood the scope of the project, qualified for the work and had
the ability to perform the work in a professional manner.
• The work is currently 40 percent complete with 3 – 4 weeks remaining before the project is
finished.
• He requested an “after the fact” approval by the Committee for the record given the work
was deemed an emergency event and is underway.
Ms. Roddy moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners ratify the County
Manager's approval of Contract No.: 18-7283 with Brance Diversified, Inc. for the emergency
dredging of Collier Creek for a not-to-exceed price of $569,069 and finds the item promotes
tourism (Project No. 50154)” Second by Ms. Penniman.
Under Committee discussion, the following was noted:
• The work is for dredging of the Creek with the activity required to repair damage to the
jetty to be undertaken at a later date.
• Staff will be seeking reimbursement from FEMA for any eligible portion of the funds
expended for the work.
CAC April 12, 2018
Approval of CAC Minutes
3 of 6
4
• The dredged sand is being disposed of at an upland site as it has been deemed contaminated
(interspersed with storm related debris) and not suitable for beach renourishment.
Motion carried unanimously 7 – 0.
3. Submerged Lands Easement Modification - Doctor's Pass & Moorings Bay
* Easement
Mr. McAlpin presented the Executive Summary “Recommendation to approve and authorize the
Chairman to execute the Sovereignty Submerged Lands Easement Modification as required to add
the permit for Doctor’s Pass and Moorings Bay” dated February 16, 2018 for consideration. He
noted the lease is required under the auspices of the permit issued to the County for the work at
Doctors Pass and Moorings Bay.
Mr. McCann moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve and authorize
the Chairman to execute the Sovereignty Submerged Lands Easement Modification as required
to add the permit for Doctor’s Pass and Moorings Bay. Second by Mr. Koziar. Carried
unanimously 7 – 0.
4. Resiliency Feasibility Discussion
Mr. McAlpin presented “Feasibility Analysis of Building Collier County’s Coastal Resiliency”
prepared by APTIM dated January 2018 for information purposes. He noted:
• The analysis is a planning tool for the County’s implementation of a Coastal Resiliency
plan.
• Staff met with representatives of the FDEP to discuss the County’s plan to widen the beach
template by approximately 50 feet and increase the height of the dunes 2 feet to determine
the feasibility of obtaining permits to perform the work.
• Included in the analysis are Naples, Park Shore and Vanderbilt beaches however the
findings may be incorporated into the Pelican Bay beaches at a later date as Staff wanted to
retain consistency with the areas covered under the permit issued in 2005.
• Indications were the FDEP is receptive to Staff’s approach which is “likely permittable”
with the main concern being minimizing any impacts to the nearshore hardbottom.
• Forty three beach profiles were analyzed and 28 template areas could be widened to 50
feet; 7 widened to 30 – 50 feet and 8 widened to less than 30 feet. Those that could not be
widened to the 50 feet may require other solutions such as the use of hard structures.
• The next step in the process is to forward the information to the County Manager and
obtain direction from the BCC to select a consultant for the engineering design required for
the plan.
• It is anticipated the permitting will require at least one year, at which time funding
mechanisms, including those required for the Pelican Bay Service Division for their
beaches may be determined.
Under Committee discussion, the following was noted:
• The plan does not include the Marco Island beaches as they are much wider than the
Naples/Collier County beaches with the analysis for this area including the feasibility of
building dunes in the area.
• An amendment to the permit would be required to incorporate the beach areas immediately
north of Clam Pass into the proposed plan. This activity may occur at a later date if
necessary.
CAC April 12, 2018
Approval of CAC Minutes
4 of 6
5
Mr. Trecker moved to endorse Staff’s due diligence and supports the items identified in the
above referenced analysis. Second by Mr. McCann. Carried unanimously 7 – 0.
5. Central Beach Re-grade Marco Island
Mr. McAlpin reported:
• The Biological Opinion for the Red knot has been completed and forwarded to the USACE
with the permit anticipated to be issued in the near future.
• The project design will be finalized and placed out to bid to qualified contractors with the
work anticipated to begin after November 1, 2018.
• Staff continues to work with the City of Marco Island on the project including potentially
scheduling workshops with Condominium owners in the area.
6. Schedule Wiggins/Doctors Passes Dredge
Mr. McAlpin reported:
• Staff determined the necessary approvals required from the TDC were not obtained and the
item was pulled from a BCC agenda.
• The TDC is scheduled to hear the item at their February 26 meeting followed by the BCC
on February 27.
• The contractor has been selected and upon the final approval by the BCC, the Notice to
Proceed will be issued for Wiggins Pass with the work initiating in March and taking
approximately 90 days to complete.
• After the Wiggins Pass work is completed, the contractor will mobilize to Doctors Pass and
undertake the dredging proposed for this location.
7. Doctors Pass Erosion Control Structure
Mr. McAlpin reported the work for the southern most groin and breakwater has been completed.
Work on the south jetty is expected to begin shortly with the total project to be completed in 6
weeks.
IX. Old Business
None
X. Announcements
None
XI. Committee Member Dicussion
Mr. Trecker queried if the $34M +/- of funds required to undertake the beach resiliency plan as
identified last May are still sufficient given the damage sustained from Hurricane Irma – Mr. McAlpin
reported the funding analysis still remains as originally proposed and the plan could be “scope
managed” if necessary.
Ms. Penniman queried if the County is undertaking any re-analysis of the assumptions utilized in the
development of the sports park given Lee County is now proposing to expand their facilities – Mr.
McAlpin reported he was not aware of any updated analysis but, if necessary, he could contact the
interested parties to determine if any changes are underway.
Ms. Penniman reported she has investigated the feasibility of incorporating “beaches” in the
definition of infrastructure in reference to the categories eligible for funding in conjunction with any
increased sales tax approved by the voters.
CAC April 12, 2018
Approval of CAC Minutes
5 of 6
6
Committee discussion occurred with the Members noting it may be beneficial to have beaches
included in the funding mechanism to provide an additional revenue source for beach work should the
County need the dollars in the future.
Mr. McCann moved for the Board of County Commissioners to consider incorporating “beaches”
in the definition of infrastructure for the purposes of proposing any sales tax referendum to the
Collier County voters. Second by Mr. Trecker. Carried unanimously 7 – 0.
Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney reported she would review the issue to determine the
feasibility of incorporating beaches into any increased sales tax proposal and report back to the
Committee.
Mr. McCann recommended the Committee’s regular June meeting be cancelled (and hold a meeting
only if deemed necessary) due to summer travel – Mr. McAlpin reported he will review the schedule
however will be attempting to coordinate with the Tourist Development Council on their month off in
order to ensure business continues in an orderly manner.
Mr. Burke reported there will be a workshop event held on Sanibel Island on April 13, 2018 to
address coastal issues and requested Staff to disseminate the information on the event for those
interested in attending.
XII. Next Meeting Date/Location
March 8, 2018 – Government Center, Administration Bldg. F, 3rd Floor
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order
of the chair at 1:43 P.M.
Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee
_________________________________
Robert Brown, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on _________________as presented________ or as amended
___________.
CAC April 12, 2018
Approval of CAC Minutes
6 of 6
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX REVENUE
Description Fund
FY 18 Adopted
Budget
FY 18 Current
Annual Forecast
FY 18 YTD
Forecast FY 18 YTD Actual
Var to FY 18 YTD
Forecast
Beach Facilities 183 990,100 990,100 505,421 505,005 (416)
TDC Promotion 184 9,405,900 9,405,900 4,801,472 4,718,612 (82,860)
Non-County Museums 193 526,900 526,900 268,969 268,749 (220)
TDC Admin 194 - - - 25,786 25,786
Beach Renourishment 195 10,777,100 10,777,100 5,501,435 5,470,500 (30,935)
Disaster Recovery 196 - - - - -
County Museums 198 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,020,949 1,083,883 62,934
TDC Capital 758 3,950,000 3,950,000 2,016,374 1,975,112 (41,262)
Gross Budget 27,650,000 27,650,000 14,114,620 14,047,647 (66,973)
Less 5% Rev Res (1,409,100)99.3% 0.2%-0.47%
Net Budget 26,240,900 -0.5%
Collections
Month Reported Actual FY 18 Cum YTD
% Budget
Collected to
Date
% over FY 17
Collections
% over FY 16
Collections
% over FY 15
Collections
Oct 848,892 848,892 3.07%4.30%6.82%23.96%
Nov 1,237,475 2,086,367 7.55%16.77%23.29%28.13%
Dec 1,639,804 3,726,171 13.48% 27.18%24.17%32.86%
Jan 2,628,350 6,354,521 22.98% 32.09%28.82%34.80%
Feb 3,766,753 10,121,274 36.60% 31.24%18.29%25.89%
Mar 3,926,484 14,047,758 50.81% 19.12%18.15%26.42%
Apr 14,047,758 50.81%n/a n/a n/a
May 14,047,758 50.81%n/a n/a n/a
June 14,047,758 50.81%n/a n/a n/a
July 14,047,758 50.81%n/a n/a n/a
Aug 14,047,758 50.81%n/a n/a n/a
Sept 14,047,758 50.81%n/a n/a n/a
Total 14,047,758 14,047,758 YTD 24.10%20.40%28.49%
Forecast 27,650,000 97.0%27,650,000 High Forecast 21,620,760
Please Note: Collier County's Tourist Development Tax (TDT) collection rate increased from 4% to 5% effective September 1, 2017
Budget Comparison
Month Reported
5 Yr History-
Cum
5 Yr History-
Monthly
Budgeted
Collections
Actual
Collections
Budget to Actual
Variance Forecast
Oct 3.49% 3.49% 965,569 848,892 (116,677) 965,569
Nov 8.11% 4.62% 1,277,188 1,237,475 (39,713) 1,277,188
Dec 13.95% 5.84% 1,614,257 1,639,804 25,547 1,614,257
Jan 22.64% 8.69% 2,402,064 2,628,350 226,286 2,402,064
Feb 36.20% 13.56% 3,750,353 3,766,753 16,400 3,750,353
Mar 51.05% 14.85% 4,105,189 3,926,484 (178,705) 4,105,189
Apr 70.75% 19.71% 5,448,549 0 0 5,448,549
May 80.19% 9.44% 2,610,716 0 0 2,610,716
June 86.04% 5.85% 1,616,541 0 0 1,616,541
July 90.78% 4.74% 1,310,400 0 0 1,310,400
Aug 95.85% 5.06% 1,400,466 0 0 1,400,466
Sept 100.00% 4.15% 1,148,707 0 0 1,148,707
Total 100.00% 100.0%27,650,000 14,047,758 (66,862) 27,650,000
99.30%
71363880014.36%
Please Note: Collier County's Tourist Development Tax (TDT) collection rate increased from 4% to 5% effective September 1, 2017
FY 18 TDC Revenue Report
31-Mar-2018
$0.0
$1.0
$2.0
$3.0
$4.0
$5.0
$6.0
Month…OctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptMillionsTourist Development Tax Collection Curve
Budgeted
Collections
Actual Collections
Forecast
PY Collections
4/2/20186:28 PM H:\Revenue Report\Monthly Sales, and TDC Receipts
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
1 of 18
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
2 of 18
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
3 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $76,843 $149,990 $236,963 $316,250 $512,938 $580,227 $570,569 $334,191 $217,611 $152,642 $175,256 $127,802 $3,451,282
2006/2007 $111,854 $151,746 $217,262 $291,277 $532,706 $589,595 $640,395 $340,926 $205,947 $156,476 $174,238 $145,286 $3,557,708
2007/2008 $122,094 $174,235 $231,470 $306,731 $564,747 $617,010 $664,907 $330,698 $233,938 $145,532 $172,641 $150,743 $3,714,746
2008/2009 $105,937 $154,246 $209,703 $298,657 $500,986 $528,321 $471,924 $327,310 $179,344 $133,913 $159,039 $120,786 $3,190,166
2009/2010 $102,425 $147,706 $202,271 $304,284 $473,406 $536,310 $578,659 $314,492 $192,256 $129,009 $150,982 $123,268 $3,255,068
2010/2011 $107,247 $144,923 $207,947 $296,553 $469,260 $537,127 $620,402 $342,016 $210,346 $150,143 $191,212 $144,535 $3,421,711
2011/2012 $124,889 $171,672 $257,204 $310,088 $463,661 $581,690 $646,118 $359,807 $239,314 $156,429 $192,882 $178,108 $3,681,862
2012/2013 $154,953 $197,464 $260,572 $344,886 $428,547 $618,948 $776,408 $361,084 $254,717 $189,506 $220,981 $191,856 $3,999,922
2013/2014 $176,811 $227,247 $269,078 $397,145 $591,687 $620,019 $863,967 $443,087 $296,589 $180,835 $212,986 $290,959 $4,570,410
2014/2015 $187,534 $265,869 $327,796 $474,209 $696,710 $742,256 $1,001,853 $482,405 $312,637 $252,342 $279,809 $250,168 $5,273,588
2015/2016 $232,052 $309,006 $366,933 $481,596 $788,052 $830,360 $975,436 $467,674 $321,374 $236,928 $297,223 $249,625 $5,556,259
2016/2017 $219,686 $318,030 $380,414 $493,973 $695,089 $837,554 $973,780 $523,046 $320,879 $243,442 $305,112 $195,261 $5,506,266
2017/2018 $286,412 $428,215 $522,487 $741,729 $957,038 $937,909 $3,873,790
TOTAL:$2,008,737 $2,840,349 $3,690,100 $5,057,378 $7,674,827 $8,557,326 $8,784,418 $4,626,736 $2,984,952 $2,127,197 $2,532,361 $2,168,397 $53,052,778
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
NAPLES
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
4 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $71,763 $112,414 $147,512 $199,030 $344,074 $525,468 $576,530 $374,000 $261,791 $218,203 $208,955 $150,041 $3,189,781
2006/2007 $73,397 $88,576 $141,951 $189,026 $335,898 $517,149 $595,449 $379,673 $225,816 $216,858 $194,291 $183,007 $3,141,091
2007/2008 $165,745 $166,397 $93,819 $321,400 $408,079 $503,575 $666,564 $507,602 $140,088 $322,017 $245,721 $151,743 $3,692,750
2008/2009 $99,516 $168,129 $185,986 $280,663 $372,230 $457,015 $473,292 $324,558 $204,748 $183,654 $186,855 $210,702 $3,147,348
2009/2010 $124,837 $158,522 $168,816 $229,316 $364,347 $466,758 $550,969 $361,520 $197,005 $167,786 $223,954 $215,814 $3,229,644
2010/2011 $149,854 $169,786 $175,540 $198,803 $307,625 $416,029 $571,019 $363,648 $210,320 $192,412 $210,599 $230,248 $3,195,883
20/11/2012 $142,329 $171,194 $201,691 $244,744 $391,683 $485,677 $628,522 $372,070 $226,574 $231,338 $221,306 $186,893 $3,504,021
2012/2013 $192,829 $165,543 $196,934 $244,332 $440,902 $525,686 $766,954 $388,107 $279,529 $256,653 $264,888 $209,436 $3,931,793
2013/2014 $159,125 $229,028 $247,875 $361,032 $490,359 $597,726 $909,200 $554,875 $338,299 $299,001 $317,687 $306,767 $4,810,974
2014/2015 $185,854 $237,856 $303,549 $482,595 $642,029 $705,000 $1,044,150 $610,274 $183,261 $200,044 $187,198 $217,355 $4,999,165
2015/2016 $157,467 $202,726 $248,085 $492,348 $620,091 $739,787 $1,116,549 $477,415 $277,849 $232,651 $273,434 $192,753 $5,031,155
2016/2017 $175,389 $201,952 $253,642 $456,211 $532,011 $730,625 $1,048,066 $653,777 $353,054 $318,033 $341,272 $237,620 $5,301,652
2017/2018 $202,959 $248,234 $333,501 $553,573 $650,992 $807,319 $2,796,578
TOTAL:$1,901,064 $2,320,357 $2,698,901 $4,253,073 $5,900,320 $7,477,814 $8,947,264 $5,367,519 $2,898,334 $2,838,650 $2,876,160 $2,492,379 $49,971,835
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
MARCO ISLAND
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
5 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $842 $1,151 $1,306 $1,450 $1,683 $1,837 $2,050 $1,786 $1,900 $1,774 $1,602 $1,372 $18,753
2006/2007 $1,306 $1,258 $1,837 $1,447 $2,307 $1,932 $1,982 $1,691 $1,466 $504 $786 $1,159 $17,675
2007/2008 $731 $746 $776 $966 $749 $828 $2,806 $1,501 $887 $650 $488 $530 $11,658
2008/2009 $410 $553 $686 $687 $808 $1,137 $952 $944 $618 $723 $671 $468 $8,657
2009/2010 $676 $624 $558 $754 $633 $912 $580 $596 $541 $965 $670 $663 $8,172
2010/2011 $625 $470 $639 $649 $649 $768 $928 $937 $440 $990 $517 $667 $8,279
2011/2012 $528 $489 $863 $1,067 $681 $740 $983 $879 $807 $709 $635 $614 $8,995
2012/2013 $457 $749 $804 $654 $882 $843 $1,056 $1,206 $1,017 $664 $496 $719 $9,547
2013/2014 $603 $722 $960 $903 $1,060 $1,039 $2,284 $1,501 $1,121 $718 $982 $794 $12,687
2014/2015 $564 $706 $1,117 $1,441 $1,245 $703 $2,809 $1,687 $1,180 $915 $963 $754 $14,084
2015/2016 $438 $944 $1,187 $688 $739 $2,657 $2,811 $1,957 $772 $2,875 $2,198 $2,599 $19,865
2016/2017 $2,278 $2,663 $3,405 $3,108 $2,639 $2,741 $5,517 $3,208 $2,988 $1,998 $1,419 $2,315 $34,279
2017/2018 $3,859 $5,316 $4,854 $4,489 $4,394 $6,396 $29,308
TOTAL:$13,317 $703 $18,992 $18,303 $18,469 $22,533 $24,758 $17,893 $13,737 $13,485 $11,427 $12,654 $201,959
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
IMMOKALEE
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
6 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $2,246 $3,922 $4,783 $6,921 $9,386 $15,217 $14,334 $13,423 $7,670 $3,754 $4,162 $3,331 $89,149
2006/2007 $4,678 $5,602 $5,705 $9,961 $12,884 $14,766 $16,860 $14,152 $8,653 $3,929 $4,101 $3,677 $104,968
2007/2008 $4,018 $5,424 $6,879 $9,724 $11,917 $16,032 $15,800 $11,327 $11,881 $4,136 $4,136 $3,481 $104,755
2008/2009 $3,443 $4,975 $7,186 $8,987 $11,486 $15,137 $15,206 $10,315 $5,932 $3,302 $3,729 $3,447 $93,145
2009/2010 $3,783 $4,473 $5,706 $8,704 $12,423 $15,656 $18,852 $10,467 $6,149 $3,705 $4,019 $3,055 $96,992
2010/2011 $3,270 $5,011 $6,326 $7,626 $10,020 $13,210 $17,210 $10,847 $6,870 $4,054 $5,237 $5,113 $94,794
2011/2012 $4,057 $5,607 $7,144 $9,161 $12,338 $17,648 $18,666 $9,921 $6,879 $4,220 $4,310 $2,760 $102,711
2012/2013 $6,921 $5,847 $8,340 $9,878 $14,311 $15,331 $19,962 $12,663 $7,850 $4,351 $5,896 $4,942 $116,292
2013/2014 $4,747 $5,151 $6,995 $12,217 $14,712 $21,076 $21,820 $15,074 $6,163 $7,558 $5,348 $5,580 $126,441
2014/2015 $5,491 $7,028 $9,630 $11,248 $13,741 $18,367 $34,109 $9,684 $11,501 $6,010 $6,910 $5,338 $139,057
2015/2016 $5,320 $7,818 $9,653 $12,146 $23,046 $19,371 $21,441 $10,272 $10,614 $5,503 $7,020 $4,774 $136,978
2016/2017 $5,792 $6,847 $7,355 $10,099 $16,229 $13,627 $19,695 $10,532 $6,629 $3,908 $4,981 $4,075 $109,769
2017/2018 $1,948 $2,457 $2,554 $8,301 $11,749 $16,583 $43,592
TOTAL:$55,714 $70,162 $88,256 $124,973 $174,242 $212,021 $233,955 $138,677 $96,791 $54,430 $59,849 $49,573 $1,358,643
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
EVERGLADES CITY
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
7 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $86,479 $255,807 $446,229 $534,560 $867,498 $1,119,215 $1,277,646 $777,494 $465,272 $357,870 $335,272 $262,452 $6,785,794
2006/2007 $245,217 $358,486 $492,296 $564,991 $952,204 $1,215,359 $1,354,022 $765,087 $465,420 $368,234 $336,767 $289,157 $7,407,240
2007/2008 $233,050 $342,484 $467,648 $602,044 $937,713 $1,172,727 $1,363,500 $726,065 $479,408 $332,957 $334,056 $280,120 $7,271,772
2008/2009 $190,563 $291,340 $395,097 $538,743 $749,012 $973,781 $1,060,618 $566,718 $358,045 $258,429 $289,170 $234,304 $5,905,820
2009/2010 $213,228 $235,663 $367,743 $514,622 $827,789 $1,013,235 $1,256,966 $636,092 $393,674 $282,867 $289,743 $235,133 $6,266,755
2010/2011 $217,861 $304,930 $359,617 $506,087 $813,768 $1,058,980 $1,357,406 $639,303 $422,707 $332,170 $323,179 $259,566 $6,595,574
2011/2012 $253,531 $342,743 $457,827 $643,501 $1,038,706 $1,239,892 $1,493,363 $694,955 $460,970 $337,636 $359,119 $278,418 $7,600,661
2012/2013 $272,701 $364,816 $492,571 $676,727 $1,172,851 $1,235,834 $1,738,679 $700,538 $498,074 $380,635 $346,039 $246,552 $8,126,017
2013/2014 $233,615 $413,939 $531,597 $748,942 $1,453,692 $1,542,772 $1,924,318 $881,271 $573,867 $451,258 $453,660 $407,724 $9,616,655
2014/2015 $305,368 $454,320 $592,116 $980,270 $1,638,465 $1,639,476 $2,196,507 $945,734 $606,906 $500,147 $500,735 $402,427 $10,762,471
2015/2016 $399,405 $483,228 $694,778 $1,053,597 $1,752,460 $1,731,161 $2,179,226 $912,053 $553,879 $451,873 $516,482 $366,398 $11,094,540
2016/2017 $410,746 $530,273 $644,528 $1,026,477 $1,624,157 $1,711,826 $2,082,685 $1,011,281 $600,619 $500,350 $520,749 $345,920 $11,009,611
2017/2018 $353,714 $553,253 $776,408 $1,320,258 $2,142,580 $2,158,277 $7,304,490
TOTAL:$3,415,478 $4,931,282 $6,718,455 $9,710,819 $15,970,895 $17,812,535 $19,284,936 $9,256,591 $5,878,841 $4,554,426 $4,604,971 $3,608,171 $105,747,400
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
COLLIER COUNTY
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
8 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $238,173 $523,284 $836,793 $1,058,211 $1,735,579 $2,241,964 $2,441,129 $1,500,894 $954,244 $734,243 $725,247 $544,998 $13,534,759
2006/2007 $436,452 $605,668 $859,051 $1,056,702 $1,835,999 $2,338,801 $2,608,708 $1,501,529 $907,302 $746,001 $710,183 $622,286 $14,228,682
2007/2008 $525,638 $689,286 $800,592 $1,240,865 $1,923,205 $2,310,172 $2,713,577 $1,577,193 $866,202 $805,292 $757,042 $586,617 $14,795,681
2008/2009 $399,869 $619,243 $798,658 $1,127,737 $1,634,522 $1,975,391 $2,021,992 $1,229,845 $748,687 $580,021 $639,464 $569,707 $12,345,136
2009/2010 $444,949 $546,988 $745,094 $1,057,680 $1,678,598 $2,032,871 $2,406,026 $1,323,167 $789,625 $584,332 $669,368 $577,933 $12,856,631
2010/2011 $478,857 $625,120 $750,069 $1,009,718 $1,601,322 $2,026,114 $2,566,965 $1,356,751 $850,683 $679,769 $730,744 $640,129 $13,316,241
2011/2012 $525,334 $691,705 $924,729 $1,208,561 $1,907,069 $2,325,647 $2,787,652 $1,437,632 $934,544 $730,332 $778,252 $646,793 $14,898,250
2012/2013 $627,861 $734,419 $959,221 $1,276,477 $2,057,493 $2,396,642 $3,303,059 $1,463,598 $1,041,187 $831,809 $838,300 $653,505 $16,183,571
2013/2014 $574,901 $876,087 $1,056,505 $1,520,239 $2,551,510 $2,782,632 $3,721,589 $1,895,808 $1,216,039 $939,370 $990,663 $1,011,824 $19,137,167
2014/2015 $684,811 $965,779 $1,234,208 $1,949,763 $2,992,190 $3,105,802 $4,279,428 $2,049,784 $1,115,485 $959,458 $975,615 $876,042 $21,188,365
2015/2016 $794,682 $1,003,722 $1,320,636 $2,040,375 $3,184,388 $3,323,336 $4,295,463 $1,869,371 $1,164,488 $929,830 $1,096,357 $816,149 $21,838,797
2016/2017 $813,891 $1,059,765 $1,289,344 $1,989,868 $2,870,125 $3,296,373 $4,129,743 $2,201,844 $1,284,169 $1,067,731 $1,173,533 $785,191 $21,961,577
2017/2018 $848,892 $1,237,475 $1,639,804 $2,628,350 $3,766,753 $3,926,484 $14,047,758
TOTAL:$7,394,310 $10,178,541 $13,214,704 $19,164,546 $29,738,753 $34,082,229 $37,275,331 $19,407,416 $11,872,655 $9,588,188 $10,084,768 $8,331,174 $210,332,615
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
TOTALS
NAPLES, MARCO ISLAND, IMMOKALEE, EVERGLADES CITY, COLLIER COUNTY
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
9 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $1,466 $198 $874 $1,987 $3,447 $6,076 $10,463 $1,504 $4,446 $1,740 $179 $29 $32,409
2006/2007 $2,403 $320 $1,387 $2,519 $3,479 $4,476 $7,976 $1,601 $624 $692 $1,447 $284 $27,208
2007/2008 $296 $2,797 $964 $2,770 $6,901 $4,396 $5,539 $2,817 $587 $1,045 $176 $158 $28,446
2008/2009 $675 $111 $1,162 $1,700 $3,571 $4,192 $7,489 $1,210 $710 $349 $63 $41 $21,273
2009/2010 $367 $165 $947 $2,776 $3,910 $4,729 $6,041 $2,607 $1,350 $799 $133 $150 $23,974
2010/2011 $1,113 $260 $1,018 $2,495 $4,802 $5,119 $4,555 $3,300 $2,706 $879 $140 $133 $26,520
2011/2012 $896 $435 $1,497 $863 $5,735 $6,040 $10,405 $4,081 $1,847 $1,221 $166 $64 $33,250
2012/2013 $1,205 $5,819 $1,368 $7,009 $5,810 $6,385 $8,007 $4,216 $1,647 $1,764 $520 $504 $44,254
2013/2014 $1,152 $646 $2,975 $6,856 $5,244 $8,564 $9,155 $3,800 $1,300 $1,372 $527 $926 $42,517
2014/2015 $801 $900 $4,565 $2,897 $5,534 $7,732 $7,636 $2,667 $984 $542 $133 $63 $34,454
2015/2016 $0 $32 $582 $1,003 $1,100 $1,714 $1,380 $774 $20 $0 $0 $0 $6,605
2016/2017 $102 $0 $0 $366 $911 $928 $887 $146 $31 $0 $0 $0 $3,371
2017/2018 $304 $0 $0 $39 $993 $729 $2,065
TOTAL:$10,780 $11,683 $17,339 $33,280 $51,437 $61,080 $79,533 $28,723 $16,252 $10,403 $3,484 $2,352 $326,346
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
APARTMENT
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
10 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $18,115 $9,286 $24,892 $46,267 $62,578 $172,726 $290,466 $55,985 $24,142 $17,905 $14,052 $10,670 $747,084
2006/2007 $17,081 $12,475 $21,751 $61,089 $79,540 $188,992 $323,240 $57,775 $23,138 $20,648 $14,595 $19,893 $840,217
2007/2008 $26,279 $14,948 $26,623 $60,871 $114,344 $203,054 $362,939 $60,403 $34,262 $19,440 $17,944 $15,076 $956,183
2008/2009 $18,344 $13,399 $23,789 $52,809 $91,805 $192,617 $347,817 $58,346 $23,642 $19,728 $12,954 $10,983 $866,233
2009/2010 $19,477 $14,463 $32,182 $63,689 $67,669 $240,487 $412,028 $65,444 $26,234 $23,042 $50,203 $55,623 $1,070,541
2010/2011 $84,551 $18,112 $30,208 $63,785 $91,669 $231,388 $462,079 $56,684 $32,886 $37,981 $18,278 $15,431 $1,143,052
2011/2012 $39,952 $21,515 $35,761 $82,154 $118,188 $264,235 $531,116 $59,412 $47,525 $37,085 $14,978 $13,141 $1,265,062
2012/2013 $37,104 $19,268 $34,216 $94,314 $124,921 $219,346 $582,861 $90,012 $45,445 $40,211 $15,982 $16,249 $1,319,929
2013/2014 $38,983 $23,686 $46,013 $113,055 $152,407 $278,202 $669,832 $111,727 $47,175 $55,723 $31,761 $29,195 $1,597,759
2014/2015 $51,794 $33,782 $60,359 $151,936 $146,758 $354,350 $790,643 $116,876 $70,976 $76,779 $33,550 $26,069 $1,913,872
2015/2016 $60,967 $36,867 $68,114 $157,270 $162,164 $444,282 $887,877 $124,587 $75,496 $73,065 $40,103 $35,487 $2,166,279
2016/2017 $57,428 $29,696 $53,673 $170,875 $181,452 $480,269 $798,816 $116,418 $64,600 $73,171 $32,066 $17,110 $2,075,574
2017/2018 $61,496 $39,621 $62,368 $229,125 $166,958 $364,363 $923,931
TOTAL:$531,571 $287,118 $519,949 $1,347,239 $1,560,453 $3,634,311 $6,459,714 $973,669 $515,521 $494,778 $296,466 $264,927 $16,885,716
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
CONDOMINIUM
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
11 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $2,009 $2,462 $6,622 $17,116 $21,543 $30,174 $33,024 $11,607 $5,331 $3,474 $3,313 $3,135 $139,810
2006/2007 $3,579 $4,746 $11,676 $11,640 $20,946 $27,551 $38,732 $9,843 $5,634 $2,542 $2,679 $2,917 $142,485
2007/2008 $2,813 $3,141 $5,568 $14,015 $22,010 $27,176 $32,516 $13,625 $3,740 $3,059 $2,716 $2,530 $132,909
2008/2009 $2,648 $3,212 $4,849 $13,465 $39,031 $26,499 $40,324 $8,261 $3,491 $2,910 $1,959 $1,859 $148,508
2009/2010 $2,494 $2,999 $5,825 $13,772 $21,117 $30,227 $41,973 $7,260 $3,551 $1,501 $3,616 $1,954 $136,289
2010/2011 $1,903 $3,102 $5,296 $14,095 $18,919 $25,457 $42,028 $7,013 $3,961 $1,735 $3,441 $2,802 $129,752
2011/2012 $1,892 $3,546 $5,271 $11,540 $28,012 $27,270 $22,208 $7,704 $19,524 $2,046 $3,239 $2,103 $134,355
2012/2013 $2,387 $2,995 $6,424 $14,205 $23,600 $25,327 $37,713 $10,830 $3,897 $2,184 $4,143 $2,221 $135,926
2013/2014 $1,993 $3,212 $5,155 $14,761 $36,764 $35,967 $28,369 $11,973 $5,362 $3,463 $3,354 $3,157 $153,530
2014/2015 $3,597 $6,207 $9,069 $22,943 $38,241 $27,390 $46,976 $9,553 $4,949 $3,096 $3,347 $2,309 $177,677
2015/2016 $2,724 $4,412 $8,772 $20,618 $37,682 $31,554 $30,013 $8,095 $6,071 $2,937 $4,443 $1,717 $159,038
2016/2017 $7,602 $7,952 $8,080 $21,613 $34,788 $34,222 $32,073 $12,719 $4,890 $2,697 $3,482 $1,890 $172,008
2017/2018 $1,279 $5,875 $10,173 $23,802 $44,929 $40,963 $127,021
TOTAL:$36,920 $53,861 $92,780 $213,585 $387,582 $389,777 $425,949 $118,483 $70,401 $31,644 $39,732 $28,594 $1,889,308
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
CAMPGROUND-RV-PARK
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
12 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $284,057 $467,480 $720,774 $761,245 $1,112,751 $1,512,646 $1,716,480 $1,253,822 $855,707 $647,441 $626,697 $488,099 $10,447,199
2006/2007 $371,144 $531,060 $735,510 $744,056 $1,163,479 $1,582,476 $1,772,635 $1,282,854 $829,704 $641,921 $614,936 $533,317 $10,803,092
2007/2008 $450,926 $600,629 $663,134 $899,608 $1,210,928 $1,557,503 $1,811,406 $1,370,272 $738,197 $715,412 $647,247 $503,218 $11,168,480
2008/2009 $326,143 $547,238 $683,525 $804,914 $926,626 $1,244,914 $1,240,850 $1,012,168 $653,733 $484,556 $539,652 $482,466 $8,946,785
2009/2010 $367,978 $469,435 $611,459 $712,102 $1,010,110 $1,243,041 $1,434,996 $1,081,251 $698,121 $477,576 $532,222 $454,761 $9,093,052
2010/2011 $333,456 $555,623 $619,659 $684,174 $953,504 $1,315,029 $1,587,010 $1,132,637 $737,285 $567,319 $611,275 $569,446 $9,666,417
2011/2012 $410,547 $599,695 $765,114 $796,797 $1,113,647 $1,478,881 $1,662,425 $1,202,831 $787,911 $585,887 $662,575 $552,740 $10,619,050
2012/2013 $495,304 $623,240 $817,839 $841,115 $1,297,086 $1,528,434 $2,029,146 $1,189,336 $899,504 $657,869 $713,107 $550,807 $11,642,787
2013/2014 $421,418 $763,375 $861,981 $987,059 $1,521,759 $1,892,765 $2,217,126 $1,509,105 $1,053,566 $739,111 $836,888 $829,790 $13,633,943
2014/2015 $489,410 $800,822 $978,573 $1,246,839 $1,628,493 $2,041,235 $2,567,419 $1,640,157 $904,647 $714,526 $791,187 $719,164 $14,522,472
2015/2016 $587,337 $828,572 $1,055,353 $1,284,152 $1,686,637 $2,079,266 $2,455,547 $1,467,836 $974,845 $692,049 $885,940 $672,676 $14,670,210
2016/2017 $626,746 $877,729 $1,017,788 $1,287,233 $1,563,872 $2,039,072 $2,372,645 $1,759,078 $1,094,422 $813,074 $977,476 $673,803 $15,102,938
2017/2018 $613,533 $1,022,875 $1,308,762 $1,685,174 $2,115,325 $2,571,812 $9,317,481
TOTAL:$5,777,999 $8,687,773 $10,839,471 $12,734,468 $17,304,217 $22,087,074 $22,867,685 $15,901,347 $10,227,642 $7,736,741 $8,439,202 $7,030,287 $149,633,906
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
HOTEL-MOTEL
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
13 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $865 $2,254 $3,617 $4,037 $7,099 $8,669 $15,490 $9,765 $8,182 $4,710 $7,116 $5,100 $76,904
2006/2007 $2,028 $3,691 $9,886 $10,092 $19,130 $24,221 $26,340 $17,397 $9,043 $6,290 $12,221 $6,099 $146,438
2007/2008 $6,597 $7,295 $10,353 $10,716 $20,438 $19,074 $20,960 $13,613 $7,614 $7,215 $7,767 $6,333 $137,975
2008/2009 $4,897 $5,623 $7,807 $10,438 $14,909 $13,650 $20,868 $21,687 $10,080 $11,449 $13,356 $13,307 $148,071
2009/2010 $10,156 $9,509 $13,274 $20,198 $17,462 $28,801 $34,980 $31,383 $12,115 $19,999 $15,197 $9,839 $222,913
2010/2011 $7,444 $5,816 $13,426 $18,029 $17,347 $22,275 $27,152 $28,303 $16,540 $6,406 $14,542 $9,450 $186,730
2011/2012 $4,990 $7,843 $11,914 $14,375 $18,080 $18,075 $22,054 $23,386 $10,833 $11,349 $16,720 $6,776 $166,395
2012/2013 $7,420 $9,011 $8,739 $10,799 $18,677 $30,204 $25,897 $17,922 $11,497 $15,806 $14,176 $13,514 $183,662
2013/2014 $7,725 $9,110 $10,946 $16,611 $16,706 $24,095 $25,334 $25,782 $11,816 $10,651 $18,300 $9,171 $186,247
2014/2015 $7,907 $9,119 $9,317 $12,089 $20,035 $18,110 $29,146 $23,859 $12,435 $11,037 $9,440 $8,348 $170,842
2015/2016 $6,528 $8,747 $8,746 $11,803 $17,912 $18,711 $23,039 $16,287 $9,077 $8,436 $12,384 $9,435 $151,105
2016/2017 $6,671 $6,505 $7,993 $11,488 $14,095 $13,429 $26,460 $15,473 $15,673 $14,178 $17,732 $12,203 $161,900
2017/2018 $5,645 $7,545 $10,429 $15,348 $15,016 $20,863 $74,846
TOTAL:$78,873 $92,068 $126,447 $166,023 $216,906 $260,177 $297,720 $244,857 $134,905 $127,526 $158,951 $109,575 $2,014,028
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
INTERVAL
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
14 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $26 $312 $554 $517 $129 $779 $2,399 $45 $51 $89 $14 $2 $4,917
2006/2007 $3,093 $482 $203 $620 $1,110 $2,831 $2,017 $700 $828 $133 $160 $170 $12,347
2007/2008 $172 $288 $768 $1,444 $3,492 $1,941 $4,349 $557 $218 $461 $348 $450 $14,488
2008/2009 $43 $162 $1,057 $1,229 $1,982 $3,139 $4,012 $1,175 $702 $228 $249 $194 $14,172
2009/2010 $438 $746 $974 $1,688 $2,479 $1,940 $5,061 $2,170 $911 $516 $292 $464 $17,679
2010/2011 $352 $705 $1,477 $2,940 $3,895 $4,309 $5,743 $1,692 $879 $312 $266 $257 $22,827
2011/2012 $228 $517 $543 $1,455 $1,392 $3,710 $4,826 $1,441 $466 $126 $156 $157 $15,017
2012/2013 $126 $281 $1,558 $1,306 $1,815 $3,131 $6,289 $814 $1,025 ($564)$327 $146 $16,254
2013/2014 $64 $80 $112 $842 $1,238 $1,737 $4,279 $505 $128 $19 $106 $6 $9,116
2014/2015 $19 $23 $116 $1,531 $522 $1,121 $5,015 $799 $552 $17 $16 $17 $9,748
2015/2016 $0 $37 $159 $585 $657 $2,431 $3,617 $534 $160 $187 $27 $19 $8,413
2016/2017 $18 $20 $323 $409 $610 $1,890 $2,965 $536 $46 $87 $38 $31 $6,973
2017/2018 $74 $69 $113 $417 $1,123 $952 $2,748
TOTAL:$4,653 $3,722 $7,957 $14,983 $20,444 $29,911 $50,572 $10,968 $5,966 $1,611 $1,999 $1,913 $154,699
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
MOBILE HOME PARK
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
15 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $9,710 $3,439 $4,409 $18,100 $17,773 $24,067 $52,042 $15,400 $5,945 $9,955 $6,729 $3,319 $170,888
2006/2007 $13,559 $4,549 $6,049 $20,838 $14,666 $23,955 $67,207 $13,573 $6,254 $16,936 $7,301 $8,453 $203,340
2007/2008 $17,673 $7,136 $12,482 $27,895 $15,617 $22,793 $82,815 $18,577 $11,121 $19,502 $8,797 $10,929 $255,337
2008/2009 $17,263 $11,147 $10,098 $33,205 $16,416 $33,371 $97,716 $19,903 $11,470 $23,375 $12,173 $9,587 $295,724
2009/2010 $24,226 $7,933 $12,349 $33,206 $16,749 $41,749 $113,111 $20,584 $9,537 $23,926 $12,516 $17,674 $333,560
2010/2011 $31,981 $9,989 $12,618 $39,011 $20,626 $40,342 $126,367 $27,892 $12,448 $28,622 $20,527 $9,345 $379,768
2011/2011 $45,000 $11,899 $21,462 $49,877 $28,960 $51,324 $151,981 $26,449 $21,948 $38,055 $14,146 $33,708 $494,809
2012/2013 $38,478 $20,317 $19,333 $64,759 $37,280 $58,743 $169,738 $37,878 $24,636 $47,914 $17,384 $13,850 $550,310
2013/2014 $52,554 $16,301 $22,264 $69,743 $46,047 $59,529 $246,183 $58,476 $28,202 $57,917 $23,435 $24,534 $705,185
2014/2015 $70,504 $28,196 $27,002 $102,653 $55,207 $89,876 $298,550 $52,158 $47,797 $69,675 $21,450 $26,396 $889,464
2015/2016 $67,138 $28,733 $31,540 $113,112 $59,552 $131,755 $361,396 $56,053 $34,679 $73,245 $26,281 $20,359 $1,003,843
2016/2017 $83,753 $21,429 $34,054 $113,691 $72,356 $139,427 $374,058 $83,333 $34,610 $89,029 $24,924 $20,192 $1,090,856
2017/2018 $86,058 $34,298 $44,503 $151,536 $65,860 $138,385 $520,640
TOTAL:$557,897 $205,366 $258,163 $837,626 $467,109 $855,316 $2,141,164 $430,276 $248,647 $498,151 $195,663 $198,346 $6,893,724
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
SINGLE FAMILY
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
16 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $21,925 $37,853 $75,051 $208,942 $510,259 $486,827 $320,765 $152,766 $50,440 $48,929 $67,147 $34,644 $2,015,548
2006/2007 $23,565 $48,345 $72,589 $205,848 $533,649 $484,299 $370,561 $117,786 $32,077 $56,839 $56,844 $51,153 $2,053,555
2007/2008 $20,882 $53,052 $80,700 $223,546 $529,475 $474,235 $393,053 $97,329 $70,463 $39,158 $72,047 $47,923 $2,101,863
2008/2009 $29,856 $38,351 $66,371 $209,977 $540,182 $457,009 $262,916 $107,095 $44,859 $37,426 $59,058 $51,270 $1,904,370
2009/2010 $19,813 $41,738 $68,084 $210,249 $539,102 $441,771 $357,570 $112,468 $37,806 $36,973 $55,189 $37,468 $1,958,231
2010/2011 $18,057 $31,513 $66,367 $185,189 $490,560 $382,195 $312,031 $99,230 $43,978 $36,515 $62,275 $33,265 $1,761,175
2011/2012 $21,829 $46,255 $83,167 $251,500 $593,055 $476,112 $382,637 $112,328 $44,490 $54,563 $66,272 $38,104 $2,170,312
2012/2013 $45,837 $53,488 $69,744 $242,970 $548,304 $525,072 $443,408 $112,590 $53,536 $66,625 $72,661 $56,214 $2,290,449
2013/2014 $51,012 $59,677 $107,059 $311,312 $771,345 $481,773 $521,311 $174,440 $68,490 $71,114 $76,292 $115,045 $2,808,870
2014/2015 $60,779 $86,730 $145,207 $408,875 $1,097,400 $565,988 $534,043 $203,715 $73,145 $83,786 $116,492 $93,676 $3,469,836
2015/2016 $69,988 $96,322 $147,370 $451,832 $1,218,684 $613,623 $532,594 $195,205 $64,140 $79,911 $127,179 $76,456 $3,673,304
2016/2017 $31,571 $116,434 $167,433 $384,193 $1,002,041 $587,136 $521,839 $214,141 $69,897 $75,495 $117,815 $59,962 $3,347,957
2017/2018 $80,503 $127,192 $203,456 $522,909 $1,356,549 $788,417 $3,079,026
TOTAL:$495,617 $836,950 $1,352,598 $3,817,342 $9,730,605 $6,764,457 $4,952,728 $1,699,093 $653,321 $687,334 $949,271 $695,180 $32,634,496
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
REALTOR
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
17 of 18
FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006 $38,173 $523,284 $836,793 $1,058,211 $1,735,579 $2,241,964 $2,441,129 $1,500,894 $954,244 $734,243 $725,247 $544,998 $13,334,759
2006/2007 $436,452 $605,668 $859,051 $1,056,702 $1,835,999 $2,338,801 $2,608,708 $1,501,529 $907,302 $746,001 $710,183 $622,286 $14,228,682
2007/2008 $525,638 $689,286 $800,592 $1,240,865 $1,923,205 $2,310,172 $2,713,577 $1,577,193 $866,202 $805,292 $757,042 $586,617 $14,795,681
2008/2009 $399,869 $619,243 $798,658 $1,127,737 $1,634,522 $1,975,391 $2,021,992 $1,229,845 $748,687 $580,021 $639,464 $569,707 $12,345,136
2009/2010 $444,949 $546,988 $745,094 $1,057,680 $1,678,598 $2,032,871 $2,406,026 $1,323,167 $789,625 $584,332 $669,368 $577,933 $12,856,631
2010/2011 $478,857 $625,120 $750,069 $1,009,718 $1,601,322 $2,026,114 $2,566,965 $1,356,751 $850,683 $679,769 $730,744 $640,129 $13,316,241
2011/2012 $525,334 $691,705 $924,729 $1,208,561 $1,907,069 $2,325,647 $2,787,652 $1,437,632 $934,544 $730,332 $778,252 $646,793 $14,898,250
2012/2013 $627,861 $734,419 $959,221 $1,276,477 $2,057,493 $2,396,642 $3,303,059 $1,463,598 $1,041,187 $831,809 $838,300 $653,505 $16,183,571
2013/2014 $574,901 $876,087 $1,056,505 $1,520,239 $2,551,510 $2,782,632 $3,721,589 $1,895,808 $1,216,039 $939,370 $990,663 $1,011,824 $19,137,167
2014/2015 $684,811 $965,779 $1,234,208 $1,949,763 $2,992,190 $3,105,802 $4,279,428 $2,049,784 $1,115,485 $959,458 $975,615 $876,042 $21,188,365
2015/2016 $794,682 $1,003,722 $1,320,636 $2,040,375 $3,184,388 $3,323,336 $4,295,463 $1,869,371 $1,164,488 $929,830 $1,096,357 $816,149 $21,838,797
2016/2017 $813,891 $1,059,765 $1,289,344 $1,989,868 $2,870,125 $3,296,373 $4,129,743 $2,201,844 $1,284,169 $1,067,731 $1,173,533 $785,191 $21,961,577
2017/2018 $848,892 $1,237,475 $1,639,804 $2,628,350 $3,766,753 $3,926,484 $14,047,758
TOTAL:$7,194,310 $10,178,541 $13,214,704 $19,164,546 $29,738,753 $34,082,229 $37,275,331 $19,407,416 $11,872,655 $9,588,188 $10,084,768 $8,331,174 $210,132,615
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
TOTALS
APARTMENTS, CONDOMINIUM, CAMPGROUD/RV/PARK, HOTEL/MOTEL, INTERVAL, MOBILE HOME PARK, SINGLE FAILY, REALTOR
CAC April 12, 2018
VII-1 Staff Reports
18 of 18
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve Contract No. 17-7188 to provide Fixed Term Professional
Engineering Services for Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring of Collier County’s coast by CSA
Ocean Sciences, Inc., approve work order with CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. for Time and Material
not to exceed $168,406, authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute the work order
and make a finding that this expenditure promotes tourism.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain professional engineering services for five (5) years of nearshore hardbottom
monitoring of Collier County’s coast as required by regulatory permits and accept a proposal dated April
10, 2018 to perform biological Monitoring in 2018.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the United
States Army Corps of Engineers require nearshore hardbottom monitoring to be performed on a yearly
basis to assure that beach renourishment sand has not migrated onto the nearshore coral outcropping off
the coast of Collier County. This work is required to be performed during the spring and summer of each
year when underwater visibility in the Gulf of Mexico is greatest. Field work must be completed
according to permit, by September 30, 2018.
On February 27, 2018 the Board approved and authorized staff to negotiate a contract with the top ranked
firm, CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc., for subsequent Board approval. CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. is sufficiently
familiar with the scope of this project and is qualified with similar experience throughout Florida.
The contract is for three (3) years with two (2) additional one (1) year renewals. A yearly work order will
be released against this master contract identifying specific scope of work, schedule and pricing for yearly
nearshore hardbottom monitoring. The Work Order for 2018 is for a not to exceed Time and Material
price of $168,406.26 A cost share FDEP funding reimbursement will be solicited for yearly completed
work.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to
this action.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: This item will be presented to the Coastal
Advisory Committee (CAC) for recommendation of approval at their April 12, 2018 meeting.
This item will be presented to the Tourist Development Council (TDC) for recommendation of approval
at their April 23, 2018 meeting.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote
for approval. – CMG
FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this work is available in the Tourist Development Tax Beach
Renourishment Fund (195) project 90033.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to approve Contract No. 17-7188 to provide Fixed Term
Professional Engineering Services for Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring of Collier County’s coast by
CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc., approve work order with CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. for Time and Material not
to exceed $168,406, authorize the County Manager or his designee to execute the work order and make a
finding that this expenditure promotes tourism.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-1 New Business
1 of 2
Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees
and Program Management Division
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-1 New Business
2 of 2
TECHNICAL & COMMERCIAL PROPOSAL
Collier County 2018 Hardbottom Biological Monitoring
Professional Services for Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring
Contract #17-7188
Submitted to: Submitted By:
Collier County, Florida
2685 South Horseshoe Drive Unit 103
Naples, Florida 34104
Tel: 239-252-2966
CSA Ocean Sciences Inc.
8502 SW Kansas Avenue
Stuart, Florida 34997
Tel: 772-219-3000
CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC.
The content of this document is the exclusive property of CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. It has been provided for the purpose for which
it is supplied and is not for general release or disclosure. The recipient of this document should take all measures to ensure that the
contents are only disclosed to those persons having a legitimate right to know. The recipient should also note that this document
is provided on the express terms that it is not to be copied whole or in part or disclosed in any manner to third parties without the
express authority in writing from CSA Ocean Sciences Inc.
1
Prepared For: Prepared By:
Collier County, Florida
Mr. Gary McAlpin
Director, Coastal Zone Management Section
Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and
Program Management Division
Tel: 239-252-2966
CSA Ocean Sciences Inc.
Chip Baumberger
Project Scientist 2;
Ports, Harbors and Beaches Group
Tel: 772-219-3053 | Cell: 772-332-7150
cbaumberger@conshelf.com
The following versions of this proposal have been issued:
Ver. Date Description Approved
01 10 April 2018 Technical & Commercial Proposal: Collier
County 2018 Hardbottom Biological Monitoring CB/DK FA
CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC.
2
Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of
this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. (CSA) is pleased to submit this technical & commercial proposal to conduct the
required post-construction hardbottom monitoring for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project in
summer 2018 as well as a seagrass survey of Doctors Pass. Our estimate was prepared for a pending work
order from Collier County under Professional Services for Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring contract
#17-7188 and is based on the scope of work for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Final
Hardbottom Biological Monitoring Plan (BMP) (Revised 2013, Attachment). This project will conform
to all associated Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permits:
• Collier County Beach Renourishment FDEP Permit No. 02222355-001-JC and USACE Permit
No. SAJ–2004-08754;
• Doctors Pass Maintenance Dredging FDEP Permit No. 0235740-001-JC and USACE Permit
No. SAJ-2004-09754; and
• Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging and Navigation Improvement FDEP Permit
No. 0142538-001-JC and USACE Permit No. SAJ-2004-07621.
The post-construction hardbottom monitoring includes in-water survey of 31 previously established
monitoring transects. The survey will be conducted according to the 2013 BMP by experienced marine
biologists using similar methods as those utilized in previous surveys for this project. CSA estimates 22
days will be required to complete the hardbottom monitoring field survey. A report of the 2018 results
and comparison with previous surveys will be compiled. Per the BMP, the survey will be conducted
between 1 May and 30 September 2018 and all data deliverables will be provided within 60 days of
completion of fieldwork. Draft and final versions of the report will be submitted within 90 days of
completion of fieldwork.
The Doctors Pass Maintenance Dredging Seagrass Survey is included as a separate task and includes a
2-day field survey that will be conducted in conjunction with the 2018 Collier County Nearshore
Hardbottom Monitoring and compilation of data into a letter report to meet FDEP permit requirements.
The purpose of the survey is to assess potential primary and secondary impacts to the seagrass community
from maintenance dredging of the Pass.
CSA will provide two AAUS-certified marine biologists from our Ports, Beaches, & Harbors (PHB)
division to join the Collier County team as Subject Matter Experts who will guide field activities and the
data collection processes.
CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC.
3
Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of
this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MOBILIZATION
CSA will provide project oversight, coordination, and management for the 2018 nearshore hardbottom
monitoring program. CSA’s Project Manager will be responsible for supervising all managerial aspects of
the project and will have oversight of all team personnel, including field scientists (i.e., Subject Matter
Experts), authors, editors, and technical and support staff. CSA will plan and execute project activities in
order to meet required deadlines and/or Client needs for the project.
CSA will hold a kickoff meeting with Collier County staff to review the scope of work and confirm
project logistics prior to beginning mobilization efforts for the monitoring survey. After coordination with
Collier County regarding acceptable weather and sea state conditions, CSA will mobilize a two-person
scientific dive team and required equipment during ideal sea state and weather windows to perform
surveys. It is assumed that Collier County will provide a vessel, captain, and two divers to assist with the
survey. Several mobilizations and demobilizations may be necessary to complete all tasks depending on
weather and sea conditions. Therefore, Task 1 includes provision for up to three round trips and
associated meals for a two-person team. Additional trips to and from Collier County will be billed on a
Time and Materials basis under the agreed upon rates. CSA will confirm visibility of nearshore waters
with Collier County staff prior to mobilization to minimize travel back and forth during monitoring due to
poor sea state and water visibility. Travel to and from Collier County is anticipated to take 0.5 days each.
TASK 2: HARDBOTTOM MONITORING SURVEY
A total of 31 permanent monitoring transects (50-m length) established in 2006 by Coastal Planning and
Engineering (CP&E) during the original baseline pre-construction survey will be monitored. The transects
are located among four beach segments: Vanderbilt, 7 transects (R-21+080 to R-29+700); Pelican Bay,
6 transects (R-31+480 to R-38+380); Park Shore, 9 transects (R-43+550 to R-55); and Naples Beach,
9 transects (R-58+300 to R-65). The hardbottom monitoring survey is estimated to take 21 days. CSA
will utilize the transect endpoints supplied by Collier County as listed in Table 1 of the BMP to re-survey
all transects. Each transect will be re-occupied by extending a 50-m tape along the transect length and
aligning it with permanent markers installed and maintained during previous monitoring surveys. CSA
will maintain and replace permanent markers as necessary during the field survey.
Transect Monitoring
Along each 50-m transect, the team will conduct line-intercept and interval sediment depth
measurements, survey of 11 benthic quadrats, collect coral photo quadrats, and conduct a coral census as
described in the BMP. Quantitative video of each transect will be recorded at 40-cm height off bottom at
a slow, 4-m/min speed for archival purposes. A Canon XA-10 HD video camera in Light and Motion
underwater housing with video lights and two lasers mounted to converge at a point 40 cm from the
camera will be used to ensure divers maintain the appropriate height off bottom. Sediment depth
measurements will be made at 1-m intervals along the entire length of the transect, with a marked
stainless steel sediment probe or ruler inserted up to 30 cm into the sediment.
A 0.5-m by 0.5-m quadrat (0.25-m2 area) will be sampled at 11 individual hardbottom locations spaced
every 5 m along the transect, in the same locations as those established and surveyed by CP&E. Quadrats
containing 100% sand due to cover by sand will be surveyed and included in the dataset.
CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC.
4
Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of
this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Within each quadrat, percent cover by major benthic taxonomic groups, including macroalgae (total
percent cover of the dominant species), coralline algae, sponges, hydroids, wormrock, octocorals, stony
corals, bryozoans, and tunicates, will be visually estimated as well as percent cover of various substrate
types. Maximum and average height of the thalli will be measured for the two dominant macroalgae
species in each quadrat. Within each quadrat, sediment depth will be measured at five haphazardly
selected positions and the maximum vertical relief of hardbottom will be measured. Photographs of each
quadrat will be collected at the time of survey.
Nearshore Hardbottom Edge Surveys
The nearshore hardbottom edge (landward edge of hardbottom) seaward of the equilibrium toe of fill
(ETOF) of each beach segment will be mapped during the survey. Two divers will swim the nearshore
hardbottom edge located west of the ETOF, videotaping the edge and associated benthic community. The
team will tow a DGPS buoy on a short tether (taut-line) that transmits continuous buoy/diver positions to
Hypack® hydrographic survey software on board the vessel. The HD video camera will be held at an
oblique angle and film simultaneously with the DGPS buoy to allow geo-referencing. If the continuous
nearshore hardbottom edge crosses east of the ETOF toward land, the mapping will continue until the
edge of hardbottom ends.
Pipeline Corridor Surveys
CSA will perform a pre-construction benthic survey of cross-shore pipeline corridors as marked by the
dredging contractor to assess presence and condition of benthic resources (i.e., hardbottom) within the
corridor. Following removal of the pipeline, a post-construction survey will be conducted to determine if
any hardbottom was impacted during the construction project due to pipeline placement. CSA will survey
up to four cross-shore pipeline corridors, each extending from the surf zone to approximately 1,200 m
offshore. These tasks are estimated to take 2 days and, for cost-saving purposes, will be conducted in
conjunction with the hardbottom monitoring survey. Additional travel to and from Collier County is
outside the current scope and would be billed on a time and materials basis at the agreed upon rates.
TASK 3: MONITORING DATA DELIVERABLES, ANALYSIS, AND REPORT
Data deliverables and reports will be provided to Collier County and the FDEP, with conformance to
requirements and schedules set forth in the approved 2013 BMP. A comprehensive raw data deliverable
will be provided on an external hard drive within 60 days of completion of field survey activities and will
include all video and photo data, Point Count files, Excel spreadsheets of quadrat data, draft GIS
shapefiles, and *.pdf copies of field data sheets, as applicable. Notification of survey completion will be
made by letter or email to the FDEP Joint Coastal Permit Compliance Officer.
Per Contract #17-7188, nearshore hardbottom monitoring results will be compiled into a report by
30 December of the same year (assuming fieldwork is completed by 30 September). The report will
discuss the results of the current 2018 Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring Survey and include
comparisons with annual monitoring survey results from the most recent beach nourishment project. The
monitoring report will include graphs, tables, and statistical analyses of collected data. Geo-referenced
maps showing hardbottom along transects and the nearshore hardbottom edge will be included. All
reports will be provided in electronic format with hardcopy upon request.
CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC.
5
Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of
this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
TASK 4: DOCTORS PASS SEAGRASS SURVEY
To meet the monitoring criteria of FDEP Permit 0331817-001-JC, CSA will perform a submerged
resources survey in seagrass communities to assess potential primary and secondary impacts from
maintenance dredging of Doctors Pass. Divers will swim previously surveyed transect lines, delineating
the extent of seagrass beds using GPS for mapping and area estimations. CSA estimates 2 days to
complete the survey. In areas of seagrass, divers will assess Braun-Blanquet quadrats for seagrass species
composition and density. Snorkel surveys and diver tows may be employed instead of or in addition to
diving surveys to provide adequate coverage in shallow areas and sections devoid of seagrasses. The
seagrass survey will be conducted during the peak seagrass growth season between June and September
and in conjunction with the hardbottom monitoring when conditions are optimal for survey.
Braun-Blanquet quadrats are the approved technique for estimating density and percent cover of
seagrasses quickly and efficiently. An appropriate number of 1-m2 quadrats will be distributed among
seagrass beds identified during the mapping portion of the survey. Photographs of submerged seagrass
communities and other benthic fauna observed during the surveys will be collected.
A brief letter report will be compiled to provide habitat maps, estimated densities, and representative
photos of the encountered seagrass communities. Deliverables will include all photographs and GIS
shapefiles of the mapped seagrass beds within the survey area. For cost-sharing purposes, this survey will
be conducted in conjunction with the hardbottom monitoring survey to minimize mobilization and travel
expenses. Additional mobilization and travel, if necessary, would be conducted under a time and
materials basis at the agreed upon rates.
TASK 5: CONTINGENCY CSA DIVER AND VESSEL SUPPORT
Tasks 1 through 4 assume that the required four-person dive team will consist of two CSA divers and two
Collier County Coastal Zone Management divers working from a Collier County vessel. In the event that
Collier County divers are unable to participate, CSA can provide additional scientific divers as necessary.
As a contingency, CSA can also provide a suitable survey vessel and operator in the event that the Collier
County vessel is unavailable. This contingency task comprises up to 3 days of a full four-person CSA
dive team, one vessel operator, CSA vessel, and all necessary equipment normally provided by Collier
County as well as travel to and from Collier County. This task is included as contingency and would only
be billed if necessary.
CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC.
6
Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of
this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
3.0 DELIVERABLES
Deliverables
Task 2 - Hardbottom Monitoring
Data Deliverables
• All video and photo data
• Point Count files
• Excel spreadsheets of quadrat data
• Draft GIS shapefiles: pipeline corridors, nearshore hardbottom edge, and transects
• Field data sheets provided electronically as *.pdf
Monitoring Report
• Graphs, tables, and statistical analyses of collected data
• Geo-referenced maps showing hardbottom along transects and the nearshore
hardbottom edge
• Selected qualitative imagery of transects and nearshore hardbottom edge
• Provided in electronic format, *.pdf, with hardcopy on request
Task 4 - Doctors Pass Seagrass Survey
Data Deliverables
• Qualitative photographs
• GIS shapefiles of the mapped seagrass beds within the survey area
• Collected quadrat data in Excel spreadsheet format
Monitoring Report
• Habitat maps
• Estimated seagrass and macroalgal densities
• Representative photos of the encountered seagrass communities
4.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
The project schedule will be updated twice per month by the Project Manager with input from Collier
County and the FDEP (as appropriate) to provide status of task activities and track critical milestones and
precedent activities. This bi-weekly update will identify any problems early and enable corrective action
to be taken quickly. The updated schedule may be provided to Collier County upon request. CSA will
convene a project kickoff meeting with Collier County staff and field survey participants to ensure all
necessary personnel, field equipment, and monitoring standard operating procedures are in place prior to
initiation of the survey. To minimize mobilization and travel costs, CSA will endeavor to conduct all
surveys concurrently as weather permits.
5.0 RATES, RESOURCES, AND BILLING SCHEDULE
The rates found in the following table (Table 1) are from the Professional Services for Nearshore
Hardbottom Monitoring Contract #17-7188 between CSA and Collier County, dated April 2018. The
costs are on a Time and Materials Not-to-Exceed basis and will be billed monthly. CSA will begin
mobilization within 15 days of Notice to Proceed and begin field work at the earliest weather window of
suitable field conditions. CSA estimates completion of the 2018 project on or before the FDEP deadline
of December 31, 2018. A summary of costs associated with the project is listed below.
Tasks 1-4: $136,817
Contingency Task 5: $31,589
Total: $168,406.26
CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC.
7
Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of
this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Travel to and from Collier County from CSA’s office in Stuart, Florida is provided in Task 1; room and
board for CSA personnel while in Collier County is provided in Task 2. In order to provide Collier
County with the most cost-effective program, our proposed cost estimate includes as much mobilization
and travel cost sharing as possible. In addition, CSA has conservatively estimated the level of effort in
order to decrease the likelihood of change orders or additional approval requirements from Collier
County. Utilizing best management practices, we anticipate being able to complete the project tasks
within or under the proposed budget (Table 1).
Table 1. Cost breakdown of CSA hours, survey days and travel by task.
Project
Task Description Quantity Rates
(USD) Subtotal Total
1 Administration, Travel, Mobilization, and Demobilization $15,158.67
Labor $13,872.27
PS2 86 $106.19
PS1 42 $95.02
PM1 4 $122.96
T1 4 $64.27
Travel $1,286.40
Vehicle Rental 8 $63.00
Fuel 96 $3.15
Meals 6 $80.00
2 Field Monitoring Survey $72,210.07
Labor $53,119.57
PS2 264 $106.19
PS1 264 $95.02
Travel $11,258.50
Vehicle Rental 22 $63.00
Fuel - Vehicle 110 $3.15
Lodging 44 $136.50
Meals 44 $80.00
Equipment $7,832.00
Underwater Video Camera (2) 44 $95.00
Digital Camera (2) 44 $55.00
Dive Equipment (2) 44 $25.00
Diver Recall System 6.6 $20.00
3 Analysis, Reporting, and Deliverables $36,900.73
Labor $36,667.63
SS2 8 $209.59
SS1 8 $173.27
PS3 10 $139.73
PS2 176 $106.19
PS1 72 $95.02
GISA 28 $92.22
GIST 12 $81.04
OM 1 $192.84
TE2 10 $111.79
DP 24 $75.46
Equipment $233.10
Digital Media 2 $78.75
Fedex 2 $37.80
CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC.
8
Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of
this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
4 Doctors pass Seagrass Survey and Reporting $12,547.63
Labor $11,357.13
PS3 4 $139.73
PS2 56 $106.19
PS1 28 $95.02
GISA 14 $92.22
TE2 4 $111.79
DP 6 $75.46
Travel $870.50
Vehicle Rental 2 $63.00
Fuel – Vehicle 10 $3.15
Lodging 2 $136.50
Meals 5.5 $80.00
Equipment $320.00
Digital Camera (2) 4 $55.00
Dive Equipment (2) 4 $25.00
5 Contingency – Four CSA Divers, Vessel, and Operator $31,589.17
Labor $22,379.02
PS3 44 $139.73
PS2 44 $106.19
PS1 44 $95.02
T3 44 $103.40
T1 44 $64.27
Travel $4,926.15
Fuel – Truck 66 $3.15
Fuel – Vessel 90 $3.68
Dockage 3 $52.50
Lodging 20 $136.50
Meals 18.75 $80.00
Equipment $4,284.00
Survey Vessel 3 $550.00
CSA Truck 3 $150.00
Underwater Video Camera (2) 6 $95.00
Digital Camera (2) 6 $55.00
Hypack® Computer 3 $180.00
Dive Equipment (4) 12 $25.00
Diver Recall System 3 $20.00
Dive tanks 48 $8.00
TOTAL $168,406.26
6.0 PROPOSAL TERMS
CSA Ocean Sciences Inc.’s commercial proposal price calculations were based upon its “General Terms”
as well as “Project-Specific Terms,” which are outlined below. If the Client has issues with any of these
items, CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. reserves the right to modify its original proposal price in order to meet
any cost increase arising from any modifications requested by the Client.
This proposal contains privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific
individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended
recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC.
9
Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of
this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
General Terms
• Quoted rates are valid for 90 days after date of proposal.
• Prices are quoted and payable in U.S. Dollars. Prices are exclusive of any local or national taxes,
fees, and/or licenses.
• Services are subject to availability of personnel and equipment at time of award.
• If any proposed equipment becomes unavailable, CSA reserves the sole right to substitute it with
any equipment they deem fit. If substituting the equipment results in a price increase, CSA will be
required to obtain Client written approval prior to placing said equipment in service.
• Mutually agreed upon contract must be executed by both parties before any commencement of
work, unless CSA receives a formal “Notice to Proceed.” Upon request, CSA can provide a
“Notice to Proceed” template.
• Payment is due within 30 days of invoice unless otherwise stated in contract.
• Any additional costs incurred for express mobilization, including priority visas, will be charged at
cost +15%.
• Any costs for third-party services or supplies not specified included will be billed at cost +15%.
Project-Specific Terms
• Field days for the environmental sampling are estimated and assume that the vessel, operator,
navigation, and two divers will be provided by Collier County. Actual costs charged will be based
on the actual number of field days spent by CSA personnel based on rates listed in Table 1.
• The field survey operations cost estimate assumes that the required 22 survey days for the
nearshore hardbottom and 2 days for the seagrass survey will be completed within three separate
survey efforts; any additional costs incurred due to weather and sea conditions, vessel/equipment,
and/or other delays will be charged at the stated field day rate.
• Tasks 1 through 4 assume that the following will be provided by Collier County at no cost to
CSA Ocean Sciences Inc.:
o Vessel and captain,
o Two field team divers,
o Diving tanks,
o DGPS buoy with telemetry,
o Hypack® navigation,
o Transect maintenance equipment and supplies, and
o A vessel log of daily activities.
• If any employees of the Client need to board a CSA-owned vessel, then the contractual terms
must contain a mutual indemnification clause and the client must provide a Certificate of
Insurance naming CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. as an additional insured (excluding workers
compensation, employer’s liability, maritime liability & professional liability) and shall also
include a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of CSA for all its insurance policies.
• Travel to and from Collier County is anticipated to take 0.5 days each and includes appropriate
per diem according to Class B travel.
• Task 5 is included as contingency and would only be billed if necessary. The day rate of $8, 808
would apply if additional survey time over 3 days is necessary.
Reporting
• Project technical details, pertinent information necessary for the Project Description section of the
report, and other requirements will be provided to CSA in a timely manner
CSA OCEAN SCIENCES INC.
10
Privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary information intended for a specific individual and purpose. Any distribution or use of
this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
• Cost for the project report is derived primarily from direct labor. This cost estimate assumes a
single electronic draft document submitted to Collier County for their review and a reasonable
number of compiled comments (i.e., no multiple drafts).
• Price for preparation of deliverables is based on a single draft and final document addressing a
single set of comments for each deliverable.
Geospatial
• CSA assumes that Collier County will provide all project metadata related to navigational data.
• If CSA is responsible for collecting the navigational data:
o CSA will utilize the WGS 84 UTM geodesy and Esri data formats in all geospatial products
unless otherwise specified at project outset by the Client; subsequent conversions to other
formats and geodesy are provided at an additional cost.
o Vertical and horizontal resolution of all geospatial data are provided without reference of
vertical data to a tidal datum and at the resolution afforded by equipment, local, and space
weather conditions at the time of collection.
o CSA’s default system is differential GPS; tidal datum integration, where possible, is provided
at additional cost and may require installation of tide stations or additional water level
measurement methods (RTK).
• CSA’s geospatial products are not Signed and Sealed by a Professional Land Surveyor unless
specified at project outset by the Client; this certification is provided at an additional cost.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide Collier County with this proposal. If you should have any
questions concerning the proposed costs, please feel free to contact Chip Baumberger by email at
cbaumberger@conshelf.com or by phone at (772) 219-3053.
FERREZRA
March 19, 2018
Collier County Coastal Zone Management
Growth Management Department
2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Naples FL 34104
Attn: Mr. Clinton Perryman
Project: Wiggins & Doctors Pass Maintenance Dredging
Project # 18-7239
Change Order # 1
Third Party Turbidity Monitoring
Ferreira Construction Southern Division Co., Inc. is pleased to provide this proposal for the above
referenced Change Order. We will provide all labor, material, equipment and supervision to
construct the following scope of work.
Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Third Party Turbidity Monitoring T/M 1 $65.00/1-111 NOT TO EXCEED
(Earth Tech Environmental, LLC) $88,170.00
2 Contractual Markup T/M 1
(See Attached Third Party Proposal)
Total: $92,578.50
This proposal is based on conversation between Ferreira Construction and Collier County Representative
In accepting this proposal, the Client agrees to the attached exclusions and clarifications and they are to
become part of the contract documents unless specifically agreed to in writing by this Contractor. This
proposal becomes a letter of intent to enter into a contract when executed by authorized representatives
of both parties and subject to the conditions noted herein.
7120 S. Kanner Hwy - Stuart, Florida 34997 • Phone: 772.286.5123 • Fax: 772.286.5139
www.ferreiraconstruction.com
An Equal Opportunity Employer
oth T...
i
Environmental, LLC
EARTH TECH ENVIRONMENTAL
10600 Jolea Avenue
Bonita Springs, FL 34135 US
(239) 3040030
www.etelorida.com
12112:19190MAIN
ADDRESS PROPOSAL p 1845
Michael Ciabattari DATE 03/14/2018
Ferreira Construction EXPIRATION DATE 03/22/2018
100 SE Salerno Rd
Stuart, FL 34997
PROJECT PROJECT MANAGER
WigginslDoctors Pass Turbidity Jeremy Sterk
kt, i ivITY QTY RATE AMOUNT
Environmental Consultant 810 65.00 52,650.00
Wiggins Pass Turbidity Monitoring Per FDEP Requirements:
ETE will provide turbidity for the Wiggins Pass project as outlined in the approved FDEP
permit.
Monitoring will the conducted 3 times daily, approximately 4 hours apart, and at any ather time
that Ihers is a likelihood of an exceedenoe of the turbidity standard, during all dredging and
sand placement operations. During each sample event, background and compliance samples
will be taken at the dredge and beachldisposal sites.
ETE will email datasheets and corresponding GIS maps to tthe client for FDEP required weekly
summaries. This task is Lump Sum, per day, with the assumption of 9D days. Day rate Is for 9
hour daytime shift for an environmental technician @ $65 per hour and includes time needed
far GIS Analyst to produce map exhibits, pays can be added rX subtracted and would be billed
accordingly. Days where construction doesn't occur and no sampling takes place will not be
bil€ed. Partial clays are handled according to the follow ng: 1] Days were only 1 sample is taken
and construction rs halted will be bided as a 112 day rate. 2} Any days where 2 or more
samples ars taken are billed at the lull day rate.
Price includes to
of 20' Key West boat or other vessel that wiI€ he required to take samples
in the locations specified In the FDEP permit.
Broken dtrwn according to the,
proved ernironmenta! consulting contract as: 90 days x 9
hour days = 81p billable hours $65 per hour (Environmental Technician}
ErMrorrTmM Consultant 540 65.00 35,100.00
Doctors Pass Turbidity Monitoring Per FDEP Requirements:
ETE will provide turbidity for the Doctors Pass project as outlined in the approved FDEP
permit.
Monitoring will be conducted 3 times daily, a pproximately 4 hours apart, and at any other lime
that there is a likelihood of an exceedance of the turbidity standard, during all dredging and
sand placement operations. During each sample event, background and compliance samples
will be taken at the dredge and beachldisposal sites.
ETE wRI email datasheets and corresponding GIS maps to the ctient for FDEP required weekly
summaries. This task is Lump Sum, per day, with the assumption of 60 days. Day rate is for 9
hour daytime shit for an environmental lachnkcian @ $65 per hour and includes time needed
for GIS Analyst to produce map exhibits. Days can be added or subtracted and would be billed
accordingly. Days where construction doesn't occur and no sampling takes place will not be
billed. Partial days are handfed according to the following: 1 ] Days were only 1 sample is taken
and construction is he Red will be billed as a 112 day rate. 2) Any days where 2 or more
samples are taken are billed at the full day rate.
Price includes usage of 20' Key West boat or other vessel that veli be required to take samples
0 the locations specified in the FDEP permit.
Broken down according to the approved environmental consulting contract as: W days x 9
hour days = 540 billable hours @ $65 per hour (Environmental Technician)
Environmental Consrillant 4 105.00 42D.00
Environmental support and oversight includes attending meetings with Client, Contractors, and
Agency Representative as necessary. (Project Manager @ $105)
" Land, Water and the Environment ... Protecting what's important "
Office: 239-304-0030 Fax: 239-324-0054
Please sign and return either via email or by fax 239-324-0054 TOTAL $889170"00
Accepted By
Michael Dlyttal"Igned by Michael ClabrlaM
UPkcn-Mid-d Cteb.ft Lo -F-9.
Cons4u0on, ou,
Ciabattari
Date 201BD3141338]7 -04W
Accepted Date
3-20-18
Payments will be based on Time and Material
" Land, Water and the Environment ... Protecting what's important "
Office: 239-304-0030 Fax: 239-324-0054
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Change Order No. 1 to Contract
No. 14CO1 with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and Coastal
Systems Beach Management Funding Assistance Program for Collier County Beach Nourishment
and make a finding that this item promotes tourism.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval of Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 14CO1 with the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems Beach
Management Funding Assistance Program for Collier County Beach Nourishment.
CONSIDERATION: FDEP Contract No. 14CO1 was approved by the Board of County Commissioners
(Board) on January 13, 2015 (Item 16A22), The purpose of this Agreement was to enter into a cost share
reimbursement agreement with FDEP for reimbursement of the non-federal portion of the design,
permitting, and construction cost for the FY 2013 Collier County renourishment of the Vanderbilt, Park
Shore and Naples beaches. Amendment No. 1 to this contract was approved by the Board on January 12,
2016 (Item 16A23). Amendment No. 1 partially reimbursed the County for the non-federal portion of 2013
Tropical Storm Fay beach renourishment; the 2014 Tropical Storm Debby beach renourishment; and the
2015 beach monitoring and biological monitoring activities. Amendment 2 was approved by the Board of
County Commissioners on May 23, 2017 (Item 16A14). Amendment 2 funded engineering for the 2016
truck haul project, beach renourishment and physical and biological monitoring.
Change Order No. 1 moves already allocated funding between existing tasks to allow the County to receive
full reimbursement for eligible costs. Task 2.5 (Design/Truck Haul Nourishment) is increased by $1,563.84,
Task 3.6 (Construction/Truck Haul Nourishment) is increased by $68,652.16 and Task 3.7
(Construction/Periodic Truck Haul Nourishment) is reduced by $70,216.
FISCAL IMPACT: The work plan covered by this change order totals $15,624,654.85 with costs shared
between local ($4,809,329.93), Federal ($7,715,809.85) and FDEP (3,099,515.06), the same totals as
Amendment 2. The FDEP match (reimbursement) percentage varies by project with a range of 32.34% to
40.35%.
The subject work plan is supported by TDC Beach Renourishment Fund (195); accordingly, FDEP
reimbursement received pursuant to the agreement will be deposited in TDC Fund (195).
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the growth management plan related to
this action.
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION: This item will be reviewed for recommendation for
approval by the Coastal Advisory Committee (CAC) on April 12, 2018 and the Tourist Development
Council (TDC) on April 23, 2018.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote
for approval. – CMG
RECOMMENDATION: To approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Change Order No. 1 to
Contract No. 14CO1 with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-3 New Business
1 of 2
Coastal Systems Beach Management Funding Assistance Program for Collier County Beach
Renourishment and make a finding that this item promotes tourism.
Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees
and Program Management Division
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-3 New Business
2 of 2
DEP AGREEMENT No. 14COI
CHANGE ORDER No. 1
GRANTEE
Collier County
2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Unit 103
Naples, Florida 34104
This Agreement as entered into on January 15, 2015, amended on January 19, 2016, and amended on May 30,
2017, is hereby revised as follows:
WHEREAS, the Grantee has requested to revise deliverables in the Grant Work Plan and the Department
has agreed.
Attachment A, Grant Work Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with Attachment A-1, Revised
Grant Work Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom, the
DEPARTMENT and the LOCAL SPONSOR do hereby agree as follows:
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to be duly executed, the day and year last
written below.
COLLIER COUNTY
By:
Andy Solis, Chairman
Date
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
By:
Secretary or designee
Date:
Department of Environmental Protection
Grant Program Administrator
List of Attachments/Exhibits included as part of this Agreement:
Specify Letter/
Type Number Description (include number of pages)
Attachment A-1 Revised Grant Work Plan (8 pages)
x TR;Si
D-Afi 17 E. BROCK, Clark
M
Approved as to form and legality
-ys`
Assistant County AttonnP Agreement No. 14CO1, Change Order No. 1, Page 1 of 1
(CA0)
ATTACHMENT A-1
GRANT WORK PLAN
Project Title: Collier County Beach Nourishment.
Project Location: The Project is located between Department of Environmental Protection (Department/DEP)
reference monuments R22 and R79 along the Gulf of Mexico in Naples in Collier County, Florida, as specified
in the Strategic Beach Management Plan and Section 6213-36.005, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The
Project includes 7.5 miles, among three segments of shoreline within Collier County: Vanderbilt Beach,
approximately 1.6 miles between Department Monuments R22 to R31; Park Shore, approximately 2.2 miles
between Department Monuments R43.7 to R54.4; and Naples, approximately 3.7 miles between Department
Monuments R58 to R79.
Project Background: The Collier County Beach Restoration was completed in 1996 followed by nourishment
in 2006, including a one acre mitigation reef to compensate for damages to nearshore resources. Nourishment
was completed in early 2014 to address storm losses from Tropical Storm Fay (2008) with additional material
placed in late 2014 in the Naples segment to replace storm losses from Tropical Storm Debby (2012). Both
events received storm damage repair funding from FEMA. In late 2016, nourishment will be completed to repair
hotspots in Park Shore and Vanderbilt Beach.
Project Description: The Project consists of design, construction, and monitoring of the nourishment of
approximately 7.5 miles of Gulf of Mexico shoreline within Department Monuments R22 -R31, R43.7 -R54.4,
and R58 -R79 in Collier County.
The Project shall be conducted in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth under this Agreement, all
applicable Department permits and the eligible Project task items established below. All data collection and
processing, and the resulting product deliverables, shall comply with the standards technical specifications
contained in the Department's Monitoring Standards for Beach Erosion Control Projects (2014) and all
associated state and federal permits, unless otherwise specified in the approved Scope of Work for an eligible
Project item. The monitoring standards may be found at:
http://www.dep. state.fl.uslbeaches/publications/pdfiPhysicalMonitoringStandards.pdf.
One (l) electronic copy of all written reports developed under this Agreement shall be forwarded to the
Department, unless otherwise specified.
Acronyms:
USACE- United States Army Corps of Engineers
FWC- Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
FWS- United States Fish and Wildlife Service
JCP- Joint Coastal Permit
FEMA- Federal Emergency Management Agency
NEPA- National Environmental Policy Act
For the purpose of this Attachment A, Grant Work Plan, the term "Grantee" and "Local Sponsor" will be used
interchangeably.
The Department and the Local Sponsor/Grantee agree that the state grant funding, not to exceed the estimated
costs of the Project, are identified in Table 1 below:
DEP Agreement No. 14CO1, Change Order 1, Attachment A-1, Page 1 of 8 (C)
TABLE 1
Estimated Eligible Project Cost
Task # Eligible Project Tasks
State
Cost
Share
/o)
Federal
Estimated
Project Costs
DEP
Local
Total
2.0 Design and Permitting
2.1 Permit Modification for FY 2013-14 Collier County
Nourishment Pro' ct
32.24%
$51,165.80
$107,537.03
$158,702.83
2.2lPreliminary Coastal Processes Review
32.24%
$1,487.36
$3,126.05
$4,613.41
2.3 Permit Modification for Truck Haul 2014
40.35%
$6,548.15
$9,680.18
$16,228.33
2.4 Beach Project 15 Year Permit
40.35%
$49,078.94
$72,554.14
$121,633.08
2.5 Design of Truck Haul Nourishment (2016)
40.35%
$59,628.52
$88,149.72
$147,778.24
Subtotal
$167,908.77
$281,047.12
$448,955.89
3.0 Construction
3.1 Emergency Truck Haul (2012)
32.24%
$4,814.23
$10,118.26
$14,932.49
3.2 Pre -Construction Services for 2014 Nourishment
32.24%
$33,667.81
$70,760.90
$104,428.71
3.3 Construction Services for 2014 Nourishment
32.24%
$21,975.06
$46,185.86
$68,160.92
3.4 Tropical Storm Fay FEMA Nourishment 2014
32.24%
$5,459,386.59
$251,443.75
$528,468.62
$6,239,298.96
3.5 Tropical Storm Debby Repair Nourishment (2014)
40.35%
$2256,423.26
$130,066.67
$192279.50
$2,578,769.43
3.6 Truck Haul Nourishment (2016)
40.35%
$862,657.90
$1,275279.89
$2,137,937.79
3.7 Periodic Truck Haul Nourishment
40.35%
$1,387,519.77
$2,051,190.94
$3,438,710.71
Subtotal
$7,715,809.85
$2,692,145.19
$4,174,283.97 $14,582,239.01
4.0 Monitoring
4.1 Year I Post -Construction Physical Monitoring 2015)
40.35%
$27,377.48
$40,472.52
$67,850.00
4.21 Year 1 Post -Construction Biological Monitoring (2015)
40.35%
$58,869.56
$87,027.75
$145,897.31
4,31 Year 2 Post -Construction Physical Monitoring (2016)
40.35%
$28,991.48
$42,858.52
$71,850.00
4.4 Year 2 Post -Construction Biological Monitoring (2016)
40.35%
$47,615.55
$70,390.77
$118,006.32
4.5 Year 3 Post -Construction Physical Monitoring (2017)
40.35%
$28,991.48
$42,858.52
$71,850.00
4.6 Year 3 Post -Construction Biological Monitoring 2017
40.35%
$47,615.55
$70,390.77
$118,006.32
Subtotal
1
$239,461.091
$353,998.85
$593,459.95
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
$7,715,809.85
$3,099,515.06
$4,809,329.93 $15,624,654.85
Changes in Project costs that increase or decrease the total funding amount shall require a formal amendment
to the Agreement.
TASKS and DELIVERABLES:
Tasks must be completed as outlined below and in the Department -approved scope(s) of work prepared by the
Local Sponsor for the Project. Deliverables listed below are to be completed by the Local Sponsor or submitted
to the Department by the due date listed in this Work Plan. The Deliverable due by dates established in this Grant
Work Plan indicate the time by which a Deliverable is received. The dates do not necessarily correspond with
permit required due by dates. The Local Sponsor must meet the terms of the permit for compliance. The
Department shall provide review and comment/approval of each Deliverable prior to reimbursement.
TASK 2.0 Design
Task Description: The Local Sponsor will acquire the professional services required for engineering and design,
obtaining environmental permits and other authorizations and the preparation of plans and specifications for
beach nourishment. All data and analysis will be presented in a Department -approved format per the scope of
work required by paragraph 4 of this Agreement.
Performance Standard: All deliverables, reports, and monitoring results will be circulated to the Department
for review and comment. The Department's Grant Manager will review the deliverables to verify that they meet
the specifications in the Scope of Work and this Grant Work Plan and this task description, and that work is
DEP Agreement No. 14CO1, Change Order 1, Attachment A-1, Page 2 of 8
being performed in accordance with the Grantee's service provider contracted documents and specifications.
Reimbursement requests may be submitted once a deliverable has been submitted to and approved by the
Department's Project Manager, in writing.
2.1 Permit Modification for FY 2013-14 Collier County Nourishment Project
This task includes the Design and Engineering Services for the 2014 Collier County Beach Nourishment Project,
including acquisition of (JCP) from the Department & the USACE Environmental Assessment (EA) preparation
to meet NEPA requirements, and coordination with FEMA.
Deliverable A: Complete Permit Application resulting in Notice to Proceed from Department.
Total Cost: $158,702.83 (DEPARTMENT Cost $51,165.80).
Due Date: December 31, 2017. Task 100% complete.
2.2 Preliminary Coastal Processes Review
This task includes a Long Term Coastal Trend Analysis including data collected since restoration (1996).
Deliverable A: Long Term Coastal Trend Analysis Report.
Total Cost: $4,613.41 (DEPARTMENT Cost $1,487.36).
Due Date: December 31, 2017. Task 100% complete.
2.3 Permit Modification for Truck Haul (2014)
This task includes design and engineering services for the 2014 Naples Segment, including hot spots in the Park
Shore & Naples areas, acquisition of JCPs from the Department and the USACE, EA preparation to meet NEPA
requirements, and coordination with FEMA.
Deliverable A: Complete Permit Application resulting in Notice to Proceed from Department.
Total Cost: $16,228.33 (DEPARTMENT Cost $6,548.15).
Due Date: December 31, 2017. Task 100% complete.
2.4 Beach Project 15 -Year Permit
This task includes design and engineering services for the Collier County Beach Nourishment Project multi -use
permit, acquisition of JCPs from the Department & the USACE, and EA preparation to meet NEPA
requirements.
Deliverable A: Complete Permit Application resulting in Notice to Proceed from Department.
Total Cost: $121,633.08 (DEPARTMENT Cost $49,078.94).
Due Date: December 31, 2017. Task 100% complete.
2.5 Design of Truck Haul Nourishment (2016)
This task includes design and engineering services for the 2016 Vanderbilt segment and Park Shore segment of
the Beach Nourishment Project; and acquisition of a Notice to Proceed from the Department. (JCP 0331817-
001 -JC).
Deliverable A: Completed Permit Requirements resulting in Notice to Proceed from Department.
Total Cost: $147,778.24 (DEPARTMENT Cost $59,628.52).
Due Date: December 31, 2019.
DEP Agreement No. 14CO1, Change Order 1, Attachment A-1, Page 3 of 8 9CAIO
TASK 3.0 Construction
Task Description: This task includes work performed and costs incurred associated with the placement of fill
material and/or the construction of erosion control structures within the Project area. The task includes work
associated with eligible beach restoration construction associated with the Project such as those costs approved
through bids and construction -phase engineering and monitoring services. Eligible costs may include
mobilization, demobilization, construction observation or inspection services, beach fill, tilling and scarp
removal, erosion control structures, dune stabilization measures and native beach -dune vegetation. Construction
shall be conducted in accordance with any and all State or Federal permits. The Local Sponsor will submit a
construction activity package for task work completed during the period. The construction activity package must
include:
(1) An itemized summary of the materials, labor, or services to identify the nature of the work
performed; the amount expended for such work; the name of the person/entity providing the service or
performing the work; and proof of payment of the invoices, the period activity was performance;
(2) A certification signed by the Local Sponsor's project manager as to the current cost of the
Project; stating that the materials, labor, or services represented by the invoice have been satisfactorily
purchased or performed and applied to the Project; and that all funds expended to date have been applied
toward completing the Project; and
(3) A certification signed and sealed by the Engineer responsible for overseeing construction stating
that equipment, materials, labor and services represented by the construction invoices have been
satisfactorily invoiced, purchased, received, approved and applied to the Project, as described in the
Grant Work Plan, in accordance with construction contract documents; that payment is in accordance
with construction contract provisions; and that construction, up to the point of the request, is in
compliance with the contract documents; and identifying all additions or deletions to the Project that
have altered the Project's performance standards, scope of work, or purpose since the issuance of the
Department construction permit.
Performance Standard: The Department's Project Manager will review the construction activity package and
other deliverables to verify that 1) work was performed in accordance with the service provider's -contracted
documents and specifications in this task description and 2) that the deliverables meet the specifications in this
task description. Reimbursement requests may be submitted once a deliverable has been submitted to and
approved by the Department's Project Manager.
3.1 Emergency Truck Haul (2012)
Activities include two hot spot nourishments at Vanderbilt and Naples beach segments prior to a major
nourishment Project.
Deliverable A: Post -Construction Report.
Total Cost: $14,932.49 (DEPARTMENT Cost $4,814.23).
Due Date: December 31, 2017. Task 100% complete.
3.2 Pre -Construction Services for 2014 Nourishment
Activities include County bidding assistance, FWS Biological Opinion assistance, diving surveys and monitoring
of hardbottom resources, and coordination with FEMA.
Deliverable A: Bid Tabs and contract award documentation for the 2014 Nourishment.
Total Cost: $104,428.71 (DEPARTMENT Cost $33,667.81).
Due Date: December 31, 2017. Task 100% complete.
DEP Agreement No. 14CO1, Change Order 1, Attachment A-1, Page 4 of 8 CA
O
O
3.3 Construction Services for 2014 Nourishment
Activities include the submittal of a construction phase monitoring report, for the 2014 Collier County Beach
Nourishment Project, which include a storm repair for damages sustained during Tropical Storm Fay. The report
will be submitted by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida that verifies sand placement and
pay volumes and confirms removal of all equipment from beach. The certification of Completion shall confirm
that beach access points are remediated to pre -construction condition.
Deliverable A: Immediate Post -Construction Monitoring Report for the 2014 Nourishment of all three Project
segments.
Total Cost: $68,160.92 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $21,975.06).
Due Date: December 31, 2017. Task 100% complete.
3.4 Tropical Storm Fay Repair Nourishment (2014)
Construction of a storm recovery nourishment to repair damages sustained during Tropical Storm Fay was
completed in January, 2014. Tasks eligible for cost sharing include sand placement and all related management
services required for the implementation of the Project. The Project will be cost shared with assistance from
FEMA.
Deliverable A: Certification of completion of construction for the 2014 Tropical Storm Fay storm repair
nourishment.
Total Cost: $6,239,298.96, Non-federal cost $779,912.37 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $251,443.75).
Due Date: December 31, 2017. Task 100% complete.
3.5 Tropical Storm Debby Repair Nourishment (2014)
Construction of a storm recovery nourishment to repair damages sustained during Tropical Storm Debby was
completed in December, 2014. Tasks eligible for cost sharing include sand placement and all related management
services required for the implementation of the Project. The Project will be cost shared with assistance from
FEMA.
Deliverable A: Certification of completion of construction for the 2014 Tropical Storm Debby storm repair
nourishment.
Total Cost: $2,578,769.43, Non-federal cost $322,346.17 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $130,066.67).
Due Date: December 31, 2017. Task 100% complete.
3.6 Truck Haul Nourishment (2016)
The local sponsor conducts interim erosional hot spot nourishment along the Collier County Beach Nourishment
Project, on an "as needed" basis, to extend the life of the Project and to protect any threatened upland structures.
The local sponsor identifies hotspot formation through annual monitoring program and routine Project
inspections. When a hot spot is identified, the local sponsor will develop a Scope of Work with their General
Contractor and submit the Scope of Work to the Project Management Section of the Beach Management Funding
Assistance Program (BMFA) for review and approval. The Scope of Work will contain a full description of the
work to be performed, location of the sand placement, estimated volumes of fill material required, estimated
budget, and construction schedule with completion date. The Local Sponsor must receive written approval of
the Scope of Work via email from the Department's Project Manager prior to initiating construction activities.
If additional material is required to complete the nourishment, written approval from the Project Manager will
be required to allow for reimbursement for additional material required.
All activities will be conducted per the Joint Coastal Permit (JCP) 0331817 -001 -JC, including the authorized
berm fill templates and authorized upland or stock piled sand sources. Upon completion of the truck haul
DEP Agreement No. 14CO1, Change Order 1, Attachment A-1, Page 5 of 8 C
nourishment, the local sponsor will submit an invoice for reimbursement which contains a summary of all truck
weight tickets indicating the actual amount of material purchased and used in the construction. General Services
for placement and berm contouring activities should be included in the price of the fill material. Reimbursement
is also authorized for an immediate post -construction survey to be performed by the Local Sponsor's surveying
contractor, to quantify and verify sand placed in the permitted template. Funds may also be used to reimburse
charges for permit -required QA/QC sand sampling to confirm sand quality. Contracted funds may be used for
successive events until funds are exhausted.
Activities for 2016 include two nourishments at Vanderbilt and Park Shore beach segments.
Deliverable A: Immediate post -construction report for truck haul placement events, including summary of all
truck tickets determining the volume placed and as -built profile survey of the fill template. (JCP 0331817 -001 -
JC).
Total Cost: $2,136,802.99 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $862,200.01).
Due Date: December 31, 2019.
Deliverable B: Construction phase (2016) shorebird monitoring data submitted in FWC format and in
accordance with JCP 0331817 -001 -JC.
Total Cost: $1,134.80 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $457.89).
Due Date: December 31, 2019.
3.7 Truck Haul Nourishment (2017)
The local sponsor conducts interim erosional hot spot nourishment along the Collier County Beach Nourishment
Project, on an "as needed" basis, to extend the life of the Project and to protect any threatened upland structures.
The local sponsor identifies hotspot formation through annual monitoring program and routine Project
inspections. When a hot spot is identified, the local sponsor will develop a Scope of Work with their General
Contractor and submit the Scope of Work to the Project Management Section of the Beach Management Funding
Assistance Program (BMFA) for review and approval. The Scope of Work will contain a full description of the
work to be performed, location of the sand placement, estimated volumes of fill material required, estimated
budget, and construction schedule with completion date. The Local Sponsor must receive written approval of
the Scope of Work via email from the Department's Project Manager prior to initiating construction activities.
If additional material is required to complete the nourishment, written approval from the Project Manager will
be required to allow for reimbursement for additional material required.
All activities will be conducted per the Joint Coastal Permit (JCP) 0331817 -001 -JC, including the authorized
berm fill templates and authorized upland or stock piled sand sources. Upon completion of the truck haul
nourishment, the local sponsor will submit an invoice for reimbursement which contains a summary of all truck
weight tickets indicating the actual amount of material purchased and used in the construction. General Services
for placement and berm contouring activities should be included in the price of the fill material. Reimbursement
is also authorized for an immediate post -construction survey to be performed by the Local Sponsor's surveying
contractor, to quantify and verify sand placed in the permitted template. First year funds may also be used to
reimburse charges for permit -required QA/QC sand sampling to confirm sand quality. Contracted funds may be
used for successive events until funds are exhausted.
The next such nourishment event is anticipated for the Naples segment of the Collier County Beach Nourishment
Project in late 2017.
DEP Agreement No. 14CO1, Change Order 1, Attachment A-1, Page 6 of 8 z-9
Deliverable A: Immediate post -construction report for truck haul placement events, including summary of all
truck tickets determining the volume placed and as -built profile survey of the fill template. (JCP 0331817 -001 -
JC).
Total Cost: $3,423,530.71 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $1,381,394.64).
Due Date: As needed while funds remain or until December 31, 2019.
Deliverable B: Construction phase (2017) shorebird monitoring data submitted in FWC format and in
accordance with JCP 0331817 -001 -JC.
Total Cost: $15,180 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $6,125.13).
Due Date: December 31, 2019.
TASK 4.0 Monitorin
Task Description: This task includes a monitoring program conducted in accordance with the requirements
specified in all permits issued by State or Federal agencies. A monitoring scope of work must be developed in
a manner which will coordinate the monitoring activities associated with current shoreline stabilization projects
located within or adjacent to the Project area and with the Department's Regional Coastal Monitoring Program.
All data and analysis will be presented in a Department -approved format per the scope of work required by
paragraph 4 of this agreement.
Performance Standard: All deliverables, reports, and monitoring results will be circulated to the Department
for review and comment. The Department's Grant Manager will review the deliverables to verify that they meet
the specifications in the Scope of Work and this Grant Work Plan and this task description, and that work is
being performed in accordance with the Grantee's service provider contracted documents and specifications.
Reimbursement requests may be submitted once a deliverable has been submitted to and approved by the
Department's Project Manager, in writing.
4.1 Year 1 Post -Construction Physical Monitoring (2015)
This task includes Post -Construction surveys and reports for Year 1 physical monitoring of the 2014 FEMA
assisted storm recovery nourishments, as required by JCP# 0331817-0014C.
Deliverable A: Year 1 (2015) Annual Physical Monitoring Report. (JCP 0331817 -001 -JC).
Total Cost: $67,850 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $27,377.48).
Due Date: December 31, 2017. Task 100% complete.
4.2 Year 1 Post -Construction Biological Monitoring (2015)
This task includes Post -Construction surveys and reports for Year 1 biological monitoring of the 2014 FEMA
assisted storm recovery nourishments, as required by JCP# 0331817-0014C.
Deliverable A: Year 1 (2015) Annual Biological Monitoring Report. (JCP 0331817 -001 -JC).
Total Cost: $145,897.31 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $58,869.56).
Due Date: December 31, 2017. Task 100% complete.
4.3 Year 2 Post -Construction Physical Monitoring (2016)
This task includes Post -Construction surveys and reports for Year 2 physical monitoring of the 2014 FEMA
assisted storm recovery nourishments, as required by JCP# 0331817 -001 -JC.
Deliverable A: Year 2 (2016) Annual Physical Monitoring Report. (JCP 0331817 -001 -JC).
Total Cost: $71,850 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $28,991.48).
Due Date: December 31, 2019.
DEP Agreement No. 14CO1, Change Order 1, Attachment A-1, Page 7 of 8 CAO
4.4 Year 2 Post -Construction Biological Monitoring (2016)
This task includes Post -Construction surveys and reports for Year 2 biological monitoring of the 2014 FEMA
assisted storm recovery nourishments, as required by JCP# 0331817-0014C.
Deliverable A: Year 2 (2016) Annual Biological Monitoring Report. (JCP 0331817 -001 -JC).
Total Cost: $118,006.32 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $47,615.55).
Due Date: December 31, 2019.
4.5 Year 3 Post -Construction Physical Monitoring (2017)
This task includes Post -Construction surveys and reports for Year 3 physical monitoring of the 2014 FEMA
assisted storm recovery nourishments, as required by JCP# 0331817-0014C.
Deliverable A: Year 3 (2017) Annual Physical Monitoring Report. (JCP 0331817 -001 -JC).
Total Cost: $71,850 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $28,991.48).
Due Date: December 31, 2019.
4.6 Year 3 Post -Construction Biological Monitoring (2017)
This task includes Post -Construction surveys and reports for Year 3 biological monitoring of the 2014 FEMA
assisted storm recovery nourishments, as required by JCP# 0331817-0014C.
Deliverable A: Year 3 (2017) Annual Biological Monitoring Report. (JCP 0331817 -001 -JC).
Total Cost: $118,006.32 (DEPARTMENT Cost: $47,615.55).
Due Date: December 31, 2019.
NOTE: The deliverable due dates established in this Grant Work Plan indicate the time by which a
deliverable is received. The dates do not necessarily correspond with permit required due dates. The
Local Sponsor must meet the terms of the permit for compliance. All Tasks are Contractual Services.
CAO.
DEP Agreement No. 14CO1, Change Order 1, Attachment A-1, Page 8 of 8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Change Order No. 1 to Contract
No. 14CO1 with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and Coastal
Systems Beach Management Funding Assistance Program for Collier County Beach Nourishment
and make a finding that this item promotes tourism.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval of Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 14CO1 with the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems Beach
Management Funding Assistance Program for Collier County Beach Nourishment.
CONSIDERATION: FDEP Contract No. 14CO1 was approved by the Board of County Commissioners
(Board) on January 13, 2015 (Item 16A22), The purpose of this Agreement was to enter into a cost share
reimbursement agreement with FDEP for reimbursement of the non-federal portion of the design,
permitting, and construction cost for the FY 2013 Collier County renourishment of the Vanderbilt, Park
Shore and Naples beaches. Amendment No. 1 to this contract was approved by the Board on January 12,
2016 (Item 16A23). Amendment No. 1 partially reimbursed the County for the non-federal portion of 2013
Tropical Storm Fay beach renourishment; the 2014 Tropical Storm Debby beach renourishment; and the
2015 beach monitoring and biological monitoring activities. Amendment 2 was approved by the Board of
County Commissioners on May 23, 2017 (Item 16A14). Amendment 2 funded engineering for the 2016
truck haul project, beach renourishment and physical and biological monitoring.
Change Order No. 1 moves already allocated funding between existing tasks to allow the County to receive
full reimbursement for eligible costs. Task 2.5 (Design/Truck Haul Nourishment) is increased by $1,563.84,
Task 3.6 (Construction/Truck Haul Nourishment) is increased by $68,652.16 and Task 3.7
(Construction/Periodic Truck Haul Nourishment) is reduced by $70,216.
FISCAL IMPACT: The work plan covered by this change order totals $15,624,654.85 with costs shared
between local ($4,809,329.93), Federal ($7,715,809.85) and FDEP (3,099,515.06), the same totals as
Amendment 2. The FDEP match (reimbursement) percentage varies by project with a range of 32.34% to
40.35%.
The subject work plan is supported by TDC Beach Renourishment Fund (195); accordingly, FDEP
reimbursement received pursuant to the agreement will be deposited in TDC Fund (195).
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the growth management plan related to
this action.
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION: This item will be reviewed for recommendation for
approval by the Coastal Advisory Committee (CAC) on April 12, 2018 and the Tourist Development
Council (TDC) on April 23, 2018.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote
for approval. – CMG
RECOMMENDATION: To approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Change Order No. 1 to
Contract No. 14CO1 with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-3 New Business
1 of 2
Coastal Systems Beach Management Funding Assistance Program for Collier County Beach
Renourishment and make a finding that this item promotes tourism.
Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees
and Program Management Division
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-3 New Business
2 of 2
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-4 New Business
1 of 6
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-4 New Business
2 of 6
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-4 New Business
3 of 6
CAC April 12, 2018 VIII-4 New Business 4 of 6
CAC April 12, 2018 VIII-4 New Business 5 of 6
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-4 New Business
6 of 6
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-5 New Business
1 of 2
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-5 New Business
2 of 2
i
STORM DAMAGE REPORT: HURRICANE IRMA
COLLIER COUNTY, FL
Prepared for:
Collier County
Prepared by:
Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.
Revised February 2018
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
1 of 71
ii
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Table of Contents
I. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 1
1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1
2. HURRICANE IRMA .......................................................................................................... 2
3. SURVEYS & DATA COLLECTION ................................................................................ 6
3.1 North County Beaches ..................................................................................................... 6
3.2 Collier Creek Inlet ............................................................................................................ 7
3.3 South Marco Island Beach ............................................................................................... 7
II. ELIGIBILE FACILITY, PROJECT DESCRIPTION, LOSSES AND AMOUNT ........... 9
4. COLLIER COUNTY (NORTH COUNTY) NOURISHMENT PROJECT ....................... 9
4.1 Description ....................................................................................................................... 9
4.2 Impacts & Damages ....................................................................................................... 12
4.3 Repair Cost Estimate ...................................................................................................... 16
5. SOUTH MARCO ISLAND RENOURISHMENT PROEJCT ......................................... 17
5.1 Description ..................................................................................................................... 17
5.2 Impacts & Damages ....................................................................................................... 19
5.3 Repair Cost Estimates .................................................................................................... 21
6. COLLIER CREEK NAVIGATION PROJECT ............................................................... 22
6.1 Description ..................................................................................................................... 22
6.2 Collier Creek Channel Maintenance .............................................................................. 24
6.3 Impacts & Damages ....................................................................................................... 24
6.4 Repair Cost Estimates .................................................................................................... 24
7. NORTH COUNTY DUNES & VEGETATAION ........................................................... 26
7.1 Surveys & Data Collection ............................................................................................. 26
7.2 Impacts & Damages ....................................................................................................... 26
7.3 Repair Cost Estimates .................................................................................................... 27
8. COLLIER CREEK TERMINAL JETTY ......................................................................... 29
8.1 Surveys & Data Collection ............................................................................................. 29
8.2 Impacts & Damages ....................................................................................................... 29
8.3 Repair Cost Estimates .................................................................................................... 30
9. Engineering for Long Term Mitigation of Collier Creek: ................................................ 32
10. Summary of Repair Cost Estimates .................................................................................. 32
11. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 33
Appendices A thru G
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
2 of 71
1
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
STORM DAMAGE REPORT: HURRICANE IRMA
COLLIER COUNTY, FL
I. BACKGROUND
1. INTRODUCTION
Florida and the Caribbean was greatly impacted by Hurricane Irma in September 2017. The storm
made its second landfall on the United States mainland at Marco Island in southern Collier County
on September 10, 2017 as a Category 3 hurricane. The storm surge and waves created by the storm
affected Collier County, over washing dunes, damaging coastal structures, infilling navigation
channels, and resulting in loss of sand from the Collier County Nourishment and the South Marco
Island Renourishment Project areas.
Immediately following the storm’s passing, Collier County performed a reconnaissance level
assessment of impacts; using visual observations, losses were estimated for both the Collier
County Nourishment and South Marco Island Renourishment project areas. Collier County
followed the procedure of providing the initial claims based on these visual estimates of the
beaches after the storm. Full profile beach surveys, hydrographic channel surveys, and coastal
structure observations were then collected less than one month after the storm in order to quantify
the measured changes of the full active beach profile due to the storm, infilling of navigation
channels, and damages to coastal structures. With this information, Collier County intends to
proceed with pursuing assistance to repair the beaches, channels, and structures to their pre-storm
conditions by reporting volume losses, dune impacts, channel infill volumes, and coastal structure
damages.
Collier County has two beach renourishment programs; Collier County Beach Nourishment
Project encompasses Vanderbilt Beach, Pelican Bay, Park Shore and Naples Beach in North
County, and South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project is on Marco Island in south Collier
County. Both the Collier County Nourishment Project and the South Marco Renourishment Project
are locally constructed engineered beaches, making them eligible for federal assistance under
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Category G funding to repair the beach. A
survey was conducted in February 2017 of the project areas as part of the permit required
monitoring for the beach projects. A post-storm survey was collected in October 2017 and was
used to determine the volume changes on the beaches. Although the storm caused significant
damage to the dry beach, the measured net volume over the entire active profile (to the depth of
closure) was relatively moderate. It is unlikely that the dry beach will recover to pre-storm
conditions based on the normal wave climate of the area. The changes for both project areas due
to Hurricane Irma are described herein to provide FEMA with data needed to develop the Project
Worksheets (PW).
Collier County maintains navigation through Collier Creek (also known as Collier Bay entrance)
inlet under FDEP Permit No. 0309260-001-JC and USACE Permit SAJ 1988-00290. A terminal
jetty was built on the west shoreline in 2005 and the inlet was last dredged in July 2016. Damages
to the Collier Creek inlet jetty and channel infilling and debris removal are also described in this
report. Both of these projects are public and are part of the Collier Creek Navigation Project.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
3 of 71
2
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
2. HURRICANE IRMA
After a few days as a tropical storm, Hurricane Irma developed and became a Category 1 hurricane
in the Central Atlantic region, west of Cape Verde Islands (Figure 1), on August 31, 2017 (10 days
prior to hitting Collier County, FL). Over the following week, Hurricane Irma moved west and
gradually strengthened, reaching St. John’s, Barbuda, Anguilla, British Virgin Islands and San
Juan on September 6, 2017 as a catastrophic Category 5 hurricane (4 days prior to hitting Collier
County, FL). On September 8, the Category 5 Hurricane Irma moved over Turks and Caicos
Islands, reaching Cuba on the following day. The interaction of the hurricane with land in Cuba
resulted in a slight reduction of its strength.
Following a sharp turn to the north on the early hours of September 10, 2017, Irma started its move
towards the Florida Keys and Florida Peninsula as a Category 4 hurricane. The eye of the hurricane
passed over the western Florida Keys on September 10 around 9 a.m. (Figure 2) and reached Marco
Island, Collier County, FL, by 3 p.m. as a Category 3 hurricane. By 8 p.m., the center of the
hurricane was past Collier County and located east of Fort Myers, as Category 2 hurricane. Within
the following day, Irma continued to move north towards Gainesville, reducing its severity to
Tropical Storm and reaching Columbus, GA, late at night.
Hurricane Irma was a Category 3 (major) hurricane when it hit Collier County’s coast. According
to NOAA, the estimated long-term average return period for major hurricanes in Collier County is
18 years. The thrashing hurricane winds tore down trees and power lines over Florida, especially
on the southern and central regions, leaving behind a trail of debris, flooding and power outages.
Two-thirds of the power company customers statewide lacked power, totaling more than 6.5
million customer accounts (each account usually represents more than one person).
Irma hit Collier County at an alongshore track, which is generally associated to lower storm surge
levels and flooding when compared to land falling tracks of similar intensity. However, alongshore
hurricane tracks are expected to cause extreme rates of water level variation over time and
therefore the most severe currents in inlets and channels connecting inner waterbodies to the coast.
The day prior to Hurricane Irma hitting Collier County, winds were blowing from the NE quadrant
(offshore), pushing the water away from the coast and making water levels gradually drop in the
coast and inland waterbodies. As the eye moved northward, the severe hurricane winds sharply
shifted direction from offshore to onshore, pushing water towards the coastline and bays (Figure
3). The large volume exchanges in a short period of time, resulted in extremely high currents in
the connections between the coast and inland water bodies (i.e. inlets and channels).
The USACE Station 42097 (Pulley Ridge, FL), located approximately 80 miles offshore of the
Collier County coast at a water depth of 266 feet, was the nearest offshore buoy operational during
the storm. The maximum significant wave height recorded by the station was 23.7 ft., on
September 10, 7 p.m. At this time, waves were propagating primarily from northern directions and
with peak wave period of 10.5s.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
4 of 71
3
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Figure 1. Hurricane Irma’s Path
Blue shade: tropical-storm-force winds; yellow shade: hurricane-force winds
(Source: National Weather Service; www.nytimes.com)
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
5 of 71
4
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Figure 2. Radar image of Hurricane Irma at Landfall in the Florida Keys
9:10 am EDT September 10, 2017
(Source: https://www.wunderground.com).
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
6 of 71
5
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Figure 3. Measured winds and water levels in Naples, FL during Hurricane Irma
(Source: NOAA/NOS/CO-OPS; https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov)
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
7 of 71
6
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
3. SURVEYS & DATA COLLECTION
3.1 North County Beaches
Topographic and bathymetric profile surveys of the beach and offshore were conducted by Sea
Diversified Inc. (SDI) in February 2017 to satisfy annual physical monitoring requirements. Aptim
Environmental & Infrastructure (APTIM) surveyors collected the post-storm surveys from
September 25 to October 7, 2017 (Figure 4). The monitoring area included profile surveys at each
of the published FDEP reference monuments between R-17 and R-84 for the North County Project
area. Profile surveys were collected along the published azimuth and extended a minimum of 2,000
feet offshore of the FDEP monument or to the -14.3 ft. NAVD contour, whichever was closer to
shore.
The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) flew a LiDAR survey during the period of
September 18 and September 25, 2017. The profiles cut from the LiDAR data were used to verify
the traditional survey described above. The LiDAR profiles were not completely edited for gaps
and interpretation where waves, water clarity and bottom growth may have blocked or given false
measurements, but showed very close agreement in the other regions.
The following surveys are presented in this report:
February 2017 Annual Monitoring Survey (SDI)
October 2017 Post-Storm Monitoring Survey (APTIM)
September 2017 Post-Storm LiDAR Survey (USACE)
Figure 4. Post-storm conditions during October 2017 survey
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
8 of 71
7
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
All work for the primary surveys were conducted according to FDEP control in compliance with
the U.S. Army of Engineers’ specifications for Class I Hydrographic Surveys and the FDEP
Regional Data Collection and Processing Plan. This work was conducted under the supervision
and responsible charge of a Professional Surveyor and Mapper registered in the State of Florida.
All surveys were collected relative to the North American Vertical Datum (NAVD) 1988, Florida
State Plane Coordinate System, East Zone, North American Datum (NAD83).
Plots of the comparative profile surveys used in engineering calculations are provided in Appendix
A. A certification and metadata for the post-storm surveys are provided in Appendix F.
3.2 Collier Creek Inlet
The Collier Creek inlet and navigation channel is maintained by Collier County. As a part of the
maintenance, bathymetric surveys are conducted to monitor the channel’s water depths. The pre-
storm conditions were represented by the County’s survey conducted August 2017, approximately
one month prior to the storm. Approximately two months after the storm, a post-storm survey was
conducted in November 2017.
APTIM conducted the surveys on behalf of the County. All work for the primary surveys were
conducted according to FDEP control in compliance with the U.S. Army of Engineers’
specifications for Class I Hydrographic Surveys and the FDEP Regional Data Collection and
Processing Plan. This work was conducted under the supervision and responsible charge of a
Professional Surveyor and Mapper registered in the State of Florida. All surveys were collected
relative to the North American Vertical Datum (NAVD) 1988, Florida State Plane Coordinate
System, East Zone, North American Datum (NAD83).
Plots of the comparative profile surveys used in engineering calculations are provided in the
updated plans for the Collier Creek Emergency Dredging Project Appendices G.
3.3 South Marco Island Beach
Topographic and bathymetric profile surveys of the beach and offshore at South Marco Island were
conducted by Sea Diversified Inc. (SDI) in February 2017 to satisfy annual physical monitoring
requirements. Aptim Environmental & Infrastructure (APTIM) surveyors collected the post-storm
surveys from September 25 to October 7, 2017 (Figure 5). The monitoring area included profile
surveys at each of the published FDEP reference monuments between R-139 to G-5 for South
Marco Island Project area. Profile surveys were collected along the published azimuth and
extended a minimum of 2,000 feet offshore of the FDEP monument or to the -14.5 ft. NAVD
contour, whichever was closer to shore.
The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) flew a LiDAR survey during the period of
September 18 and September 25, 2017. The profiles cut from the LiDAR data were used to verify
the traditional survey described above. The LiDAR profiles were not completely edited for gaps
and interpretation where waves and water clarity may have blocked or given false measurements,
but showed very close agreement in the other regions.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
9 of 71
8
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
The following surveys are presented in this report:
February 2017 Annual Monitoring Survey (SDI)
October 2017 Post-Storm Monitoring Survey (APTIM)
September 2017 Post-Storm LiDAR Survey (USACE)
Figure 5. Post-storm conditions during October 2017 survey
Plots of the comparative profile surveys used in engineering calculations are provided in Appendix
D. A certification and metadata for the post-storm surveys are provided in Appendix F.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
10 of 71
9
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
II. ELIGIBILE FACILITY, PROJECT DESCRIPTION, LOSSES AND AMOUNT
4. COLLIER COUNTY (NORTH COUNTY) NOURISHMENT PROJECT
4.1 Description
The Collier County (herein referenced as North County) Nourishment Project includes the periodic
nourishment and physical monitoring of the North County beaches (Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay, Park
Shore and Naples) and maintenance dredging of Doctors Pass as a sand source and for navigation.
The project area is located between Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)
reference monuments (R-monuments) R-22+300 and R-79, and includes three “reaches” divided
by inlets: Vanderbilt Beach/Pelican Bay, Park Shore, and Naples (Figure 6).
The shoreline is largely within critically eroded areas as designated by the FDEP and are public
beaches with the exception of Pelican Bay, which is constructed by the County on a reimbursable
basis by the Pelican Bay Services Division.
The design standard for this project is to maintain a 100 ft. wide beach relative to the established
baseline, in Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay and Naples beaches and an 85 ft. wide beach in Park Shore,
with a 6-year project design life. The construction template was designed with a stepped, turtle-
friendly berm elevation with upper berm elevations of +5.0 ft. or +4.3 ft. NAVD, and a lower berm
of +3.3 ft. NAVD. The template includes a uniform slope of 1V:10H from the lower berm crest
to the construction toe of fill. Typical construction cross-sections of the fill template are shown in
Figure 7.
Although not shown on the typical construction template, the County’s permits also include the
ability to construct, plant, and repair dunes. The County regularly maintains these project areas
through renourishment events under FDEP Permit No. 0331817-001-JC and USACE Permit No.
SAJ-2003-12405. Project history since 1996 is summarized in Table 1.
The Department issued Permit No. 11-254473-9 for the construction of the Collier County Beach
Restoration Project in 1996 authorizing the placement of approximately 1.2 million cubic yards of
sand between monuments R-21 and R-79; this permit expired in April 2006. In January 2005, JCP
Permit No. 0222355-001-JC was issued to maintain the restored beach authorizing the distribution
of 670,000 cubic yards of sand. In July 2013, a FDEP permit modification (-012) was issued for
the placement of sand in five areas experiencing high erosion along Collier County Beaches, and
in September 2013 a permit modification (-013) was issued for the placement of sand on Pelican
Bay Beaches. A 15-year multi-use permit was issued on October 2, 2015, superseding Permit No.
022235-001-JC, authorizing periodic nourishment of the Collier project area beach and nearshore
south of Doctors Pass utilizing an offshore borrow area, sand dredged from Doctors Pass, or sand
obtained from an upland source.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
11 of 71
10
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Figure 6. North County Nourishment Project Areas
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
12 of 71
11
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Figure 7. Typical Construction Templates North County
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
13 of 71
12
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Table 1. North County Nourishment project history since 2006
Year USACE Permit #
FDEP Permit #
Placed
Volume
(cubic
yards)
Sand Source Sand Placement Location
1996
SAJ-1994-04092
(IP-MN)
DBS9A0308CO and
112544739
1.17 M
Offshore state
borrow areas
and upland
sand
Vanderbilt (R-22+700 to R-30+500), Park Shore (R-
50+350 to R-53+850) and Naples Beach (R-57+100
to R-77+650)
2006
SAJ-2003-12405
(IP-MN)
0222355-001-JC
667,562
Offshore OCS
Borrow Area
T1
Vanderbilt (R-22 to R-30+500), Pelican Bay (R-
30+500 to R-37), Park Shore (R-45 to R-55) and
Naples (R-58A to R-79)
2010
SAJ-2003-12405
(IP-MN)
0222355-011-JN
2,650 Truck haul Naples (R-58A+100 to R-58A+500)
2011
SAJ-2003-12405
(IP-MN)
0222355-011-JN
30,229 Truck haul Naples (R-58A to R58+400) and Park Shore
(R-45+400 to R-46+600)
2012
SAJ-2003-12405
(MOD-KDS)
0222355-011-JN
22,700 Truck haul Vanderbilt (R-26 toR-30) and Naples (R-61 to R-63)
2013
SAJ-2003-12405
(MOD-KDS)
0222355-011-JN
225,000
43,400
Truck haul
Doctors Pass
Dredging
Vanderbilt (R-25+500 to R-30+700), Pelican Bay
(R-30+500 to R-31+500 & R-33+500 to R36+300)
to R-36), Park Shore (R-43+700 to R-47+300 & R-
50 to R-54+100), Naples Beach (R-58A to R59+500
& R-61+100 to R-64+200 & R-69+100-R-72+100)
2014
SAJ-2003-12405
(MOD-KDS)
0222355-012-JN
52,300 Truck haul
Naples Beach (R-58A+300 to R-58+325 & R-
59+300 to R-63+600 & R-67+300 to R-69+500 &
R-71+500 to R-73+300 & R-74+400 to R-78+400)
2016
SAJ-2003-12405
(SP-MMB)
0331817-001-JC
75,750 Truck haul Vanderbilt (R-24 to R-30), Pelican Bay (R-34+600
toR-36+400), and Park Shore (R-43+600 to R-53)
4.2 Impacts & Damages
Impacts and damages to the beach discussed in this section represent the measured changes as
quantified through comparison of beach profile surveys. This report presents the measured
changes between surveys that were collected prior to and following the storm (February and
October 2017, respectively).
Beach response due to the storm event can vary both alongshore and cross-shore. Shoreline
changes provide an understanding of the beach response at a particular contour. Volume changes
above mean high water (MHW) and above the depth of closure (DOC) provide an understanding
of the dry beach response as compared to the overall redistribution of sediment within the active
profile. The MHW is defined as the average of all the high water observed during a particular tidal
epoch. The MHW elevation for the North County Project Area is specified at +0.33 feet, NAVD.
The DOC is defined as the seaward limit of the active beach profile and is based on comparisons
of individual profiles and review of historical data for the project area. The DOC elevation for the
North County Project Area is estimated to be -11.3 feet, NAVD.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
14 of 71
13
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
The shoreline change between February 2017 (pre-storm) and October 2017 (post-storm) indicated
that the shoreline generally receded throughout the North County Project Area, except at the
southern half of the Naples reach where there was shoreline advance. Overall, the shoreline
receded an average of 4.2 feet within the Project Area as shown in Table 2.
Table 2. North County Average Shoreline Changes
The net volume change between February 2017 (pre-storm) and October 2017 (post-storm) was
measured to be -89,434 cubic yards (CY) above MHW as compared to +49,107 CY above the
DOC as shown in Table 3. Overall, this indicates that there was a net gain of volume below MHW
as sand was redistributed to the submerged portion of the beach profile. While the Project Area
above MHW that may partially recover naturally in time, it is unlikely to recover quickly on its
own to its pre-storm condition and needs immediate repair. The erosion above the MHW totaled
93,190 CY as shown in Table 3 and detailed in Appendix C.
Figure 8 shows a plot of the volumetric and shoreline changes caused by Hurricane Irma. The
volumetric loss above MHW (dry beach) agrees closely in the same direction with the MHW
shoreline changes. The gain above the DOC is in the opposite direction. This supports using the
shoreline changes and volume changes measured above MHW as the best estimates of the amount
of sand needed to restore the beach to pre-storm conditions.
The erosion above the MHW was identified as the volume of sand lost attributed to the storm. For
cost estimating purposes the conversion factor between CY and tons was assumed to be 1.5
tons/CY.
Project Reaches
Reach Length
(FEET)
Change at
MHW
(FEET)
Vanderbilt 8,224 ‐7.0
Pelican Bay 7,569 ‐4.3
Park Shore 10,521 ‐15.1
Naples 19,032 3.1
Average for Project Area 45,347 ‐4.2
Post‐Hurricane Irma Storm Impact Analysis
North County ‐ Average Shoreline Changes
Feb 2017 vs. Oct 2017
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
15 of 71
14
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Figure 8. Shoreline and Volumetric Change from Hurricane Irma.
Table 3. North County Volume Changes
‐32
‐24
‐16
‐8
0
8
16
24
32
R‐17R‐20R‐23R‐26R‐29R‐32R‐35R‐38R‐41R‐43R‐46R‐49R‐52R‐55DPR‐59R‐62R‐65R‐68R‐71R‐74R‐77R‐80R‐83Volumes (CY/LF). Distance (Ft.)North <‐‐‐‐‐FDEP R‐Monuments ‐‐‐‐‐> South
Irma Post‐Storm Volumetric and Shoreline Change
Jan. to Oct. 2017
Volumetric Change Above 0 Ft NAVD
Volumetric Change >DOC ‐11.3 Ft NAVD
Shoreline Change (Ft.)
Project Reaches
Net
Changes
Above MHW
(CY)
Net
Changes
Above DOC
(CY)
Erosion
Above MHW
(CY)
Erosion
Above DOC
(CY)
Vanderbilt ‐13,320 6,395 ‐14,903 ‐10,460
Pelican Bay ‐18,575 2,145 ‐18,575 0
Park Shore ‐28,766 1,436 ‐28,766 ‐11,491
Naples ‐28,774 39,131 ‐30,946 ‐3,218
Total for Project Area ‐89,434 49,107 ‐93,190 ‐25,168
Post‐Hurricane Irma Storm Impact Analysis
North County ‐ Volume Changes
Feb 2017 vs. Oct 2017
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
16 of 71
15
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
A beach inspection of the North County Project Area was conducted on September 14, 2017, 4
days after the passage of Hurricane Irma. With a Category 3 hurricane making landfall on Marco
Island, significant losses were expected. During the inspection, the beach was observed to be
scoured flat with a recessed and narrow shoreline width, and widespread overwash was evident in
the dunes.
Once the post-storm, full profile surveys were available for analysis, it was determined that much
of the apparent sand losses observed from the dry beach inspection, had been deposited between
the natural offshore bar and the DOC (-11.3 feet, NAVD), or had been moved by alongshore
currents outside the project area. There were also some changes beyond the depth of closure.
The track of the hurricane created moderate wave heights (less than 5 feet at Marco River gauge)
and a tidal rise of over 8 feet within 3 hours based on two local tidal gauges (NOAA at Naples Pier
and APTIM at Marco River). These conditions caused overwash and significant berm and dune
erosion, but led to weaker than expected offshore forces for a Cat 3 hurricane. The storm made
landfall at Marco Island, and had a track parallel and inshore from the Gulf shoreline thereafter.
Rather than creating large wave heights and surge levels, the storm created high current velocities
and large and rapid tidal fluctuations.
The County maintains R-monument signs that are visible from the beach and used as landmarks
(Figure 99) for required environmental monitoring. During the storm, the markers were damaged
likely due to the hurricane-force winds. Within the North County Project Area, there are 84 signs
that need to be repaired. In order to replace the markers, a surveyor will be utilized to support
proper placement.
Figure 9. Typical R-Monument Sign
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
17 of 71
16
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
4.3 Repair Cost Estimate
Cost estimates for the work necessary to assess and address storm impacts to the North County
Project Area are provided in Table 4. The cost estimate to replace sand lost due to Hurricane Irma
was based on obtaining material from the same upland sand source used for the previous 2013/14,
2014 and 2016 renourishment projects by method of traditional truck haul. Collier County has
sand supply contracts in place with Stewart’s Immokalee Sand Mine with negotiated sand (pit)
costs. Actual construction bids for the 2016 County nourishment project for South Marco Island,
Park Shore, Pelican Bay and Vanderbilt that used this upland sand source, were used to develop
these estimates. The costs associated with environmental monitoring (turbidity and species
surveys) for environmental compliance and with maintenance of traffic to minimize interruption
to local traffic and to prompt public safety were included in the estimate. The cost estimate also
includes contingency, ED & SA, and post-storm assessments. ED & SA includes engineering,
design, permitting, and construction supervision and administration. Post-storm assessments
includes surveys, coordination, and engineering calculations to quantify storm impacts. The cost
to repair signage for R-Monuments includes the cost to supply and install the signs. The resulting
estimated cost to replace the storm losses is $4.2 million.
An estimate for the use of the offshore sand source has not been developed, but may be competitive
with upland sand if the project is relatively large in size at the time of construction.
Table 4. North County Repair Cost Estimate
Units Quantities Unit Price Price
North County (Vanderbilt, Park Shore, Pelican Bay and Naples)
1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $40,000 $40,000
2 Park Shore ‐ Transport and Place Sand Ton 37,449 $16.35 $612,291
3 Vanderbilt ‐ Transport and Place Sand Ton 22,355 $15.75 $352,083
4 Pelican Bay ‐ Transport and Place Sand Ton 27,863 $16.85 $469,483
5 Naples ‐ Transport and Place Sand Ton 42,075 $17.50 $736,313
6 Pit Price all reaches Ton 129,741 $9.00 $1,167,669
7 Monitoring: Turbidity & Environmental Surveys LS 1 $15,000 $15,000
8 Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) / Load Tracking LS 1 $39,000 $39,000
Sub‐Total $3,431,839
Contingency % 10% $343,184
ED & SA % 10% $343,184
Post‐Storm Assessments Share LS 1 $53,415 $53,415
Sub‐Total $739,783
R‐monument Signage Repair
9 Surveyor Day 2 $1,500 $3,000
10 Sign Replacement LS 84 $200 $16,800
Sub‐Total $19,800
Grand‐Total $4,191,422
Note 1. Assumes 1.5 tons is equivalent to 1 CY
2. Quantities reflect volume losses based on post storm surveys.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
18 of 71
17
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
5. SOUTH MARCO ISLAND RENOURISHMENT PROEJCT
5.1 Description
The South Marco Island Renourishment Project extends from R-144 to G-4 (Figures 10 and 11);
the majority of which is designated by FDEP as critically eroded (R-143 to R-148). Within this
project area, there are a few coastal structures including two terminal groins (at G-2 and G-3) that
were constructed in 1990-1991 and three breakwaters that were constructed in 1996-1997
(offshore of Cape Marco at the southern project limit). A typical construction cross-section is
shown in Figure 10 below. The design consists of an approximately 100 ft. wide beach plus
advanced nourishment volume. The back berm elevation is approximately +5.0 ft. NAVD with a
1V:100H turtle friendly berm sloping down to +3.2 ft. NAVD. This project area is maintained by
renourishment under FDEP Permit No. 0235209-003-JC and USACE Permit No. SAJ-2005-02726
(SP/MOD-MMB). A summary of recent renourishment projects in presented in Table 5.
Figure 10. Typical Construction Template South Marco Island
Table 5. South Marco Island Renourisment History Summary
Year USACE Permit #
FDEP Permit #
Placed Volume
(cubic yards)Sand Source Sand Placement
Location
1991 111460389 575,000 Caxambus Pass R-144 to G-2
1997 111460389 60,000 Caxambus Pass R-144 to G-2
2007 SAJ-2005-02726
0222355-001-JC 176,000 Caxambus Pass R-144 to G-2
2013 SAJ-2005-02726
0235209-003-JC 80,000 Caxambus Pass R-146+400 to G-4
2016
SAJ-2005-02726
(SP/MOD-MMB)
0235209-003-JC
13,200 Immokalee Sand
Mine R-144 to G-2
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
19 of 71
18
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Figure 11. South Marco Island Renourishment Project Area
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
20 of 71
19
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
5.2 Impacts & Damages
Impacts and damages to the beach are discussed in this section and represent the measured changes
as quantified through comparison of the beach profile surveys. This report presents the measured
changes between surveys that were collected prior to and following the storm (February and
October 2017, respectively).
Beach response due to storm event can vary both alongshore and cross-shore. Shoreline changes
provide an understanding of the beach response at a particular contour. Volume changes above
mean high water (MHW) and above the depth of closure (DOC) provide an understanding of the
dry beach response as compared to the overall redistribution of sediment within the active profile.
The MHW is defined as the average of all the high water observed during a particular tidal epoch.
The MHW elevation for the South Marco Island Project Area is specified at +0.44 feet, NAVD.
The DOC is defined as the seaward limit of the active beach profile and is based on comparisons
of individual profiles and review of historical data for the project area. The DOC elevation for the
South Marco Island Project Area is estimated to be -11.8 feet, NAVD.
The shoreline change between February 2017 (pre-storm) and October 2017 (post-storm) indicated
that the shoreline generally receded throughout the South Marco Island Project Area, except at the
northern portion where there was shoreline advance. Overall, the shoreline receded an average of
-3 feet within the Project Area as shown in Table 6.
Table 6. South Marco Island Average Shoreline Changes
R144 1,043 24.2
R145 986 3.0
R146 958 ‐3.5
R147 923 ‐16.7
R148 747 ‐27.9
G3 413 ‐9.9
G4 207 ‐2.1
Average for Project Area 5,275 ‐3.0
Post‐Hurricane Irma Storm Impacts Analysis
South Marco Island ‐ Shoreline Changes
Feb 2017 vs. Oct 2017
R‐Monument
Length
(FEET)
Change
at MHW
(FEET)
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
21 of 71
20
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
The net volume change between February 2017 (pre-storm) and October 2017 (post-storm) was
measured to be 894 cubic yards (CY) above MHW as compared to -1,073 CY above the DOC as
shown in Table 7. Overall, this indicates that there was a net loss of volume below MHW as sand
was redistributed within the beach profile. While the Project Area sustained fluctuations of gains
and losses above MHW that may partially recover naturally in time, the Project Area south of R-
147 sustained losses above the DOC that are unlikely to recover quickly on their own and need
immediate repair. This segment of concentrated erosion above the DOC over multiple profiles
experienced total loss of 13,097 CY as shown in Table 7.
The concentrated erosion above the DOC was identified as the volume of sand lost attributed to
the storm. For cost estimating purposes the conversion factor between CY and tons was assumed
to be 1.5 tons/CY.
Table 7. South Marco Island Volume Changes
Post‐Hurricane Irma Storm Impacts Analysis
South Marco Island ‐ Volume Changes
Feb 2017 vs. Oct 2017
R‐Monument
Net
Change
Above MHW
(CY)
Net
Change
Above DOC
(CY)
Concentrated
Erosion
Above DOC
(CY)
R144 256 7,685
R145 615 2,627
R146 321 1,711
R147 ‐930 ‐7,006 ‐7,006
R148 ‐2,844 ‐3,321 ‐3,321
G3 3,753 ‐2,679 ‐2,679
G4 ‐278 ‐90 ‐90
Total for Project Area 894 ‐1,073 ‐13,097
Notes: 1. 2013 Renourishment placed sand between R‐146+400 and G‐4.
2. 2016 Renourishment placed sand between R‐144 and G‐2.
3. MHW = 0.44 ft., DOC = ‐11.8 ft.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
22 of 71
21
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
The County maintains R-monument signs that are visible from the beach and used as landmarks
(Figure 9) for required environmental monitoring. During the storm, the markers were damaged
likely due to the hurricane-force winds. Within the San Marco Project Area, there are 10 signs that
need to be repaired. In order to replace the markers, a surveyor will be utilized to support proper
placement.
5.3 Repair Cost Estimates
Cost estimates for the work necessary to assess and address storm impacts to the South Marco
Island Project Area are provided in Table 8. The cost estimate to replace sand lost due to Hurricane
Irma was based on obtaining material from the same upland sand source used for the previous
2013/14, 2014 and 2016 renourishment projects by method of traditional truck haul. Collier
County has sand supply contracts in place with Stewart’s Immokalee Sand Mine with negotiated
sand (pit) costs at the mine. Actual construction bids for the 2016 County nourishment project for
South Marco Island, Park Shore, Pelican Bay and Vanderbilt that used an upland sand source were
also used to develop these estimates. The costs associated with environmental monitoring
(turbidity and species surveys) for environmental compliance and with maintenance of traffic to
minimize interruption to local traffic and to prompt public safety were included in the estimate.
The cost estimate also includes contingency, ED & SA, and post-storm assessments. ED & SA
includes engineering, design, permitting, and construction supervision and administration. Post-
storm assessments includes surveys, coordination, and engineering calculations to quantify storm
impacts. The cost to repair signage for R-Monuments includes the cost to supply and install the
signs. The resulting estimated cost to replace the storm losses is $913,500.
An estimate for the use of the offshore sand source has not been developed, but may be competitive
with upland sand if the project is relatively large in size at the time of construction.
Table 8. South Marco Island Repair Cost Estimate
Quantities Price
South Marco Island
1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $16,000.00 $16,000.00
2South Marco Island ‐ Transport and Place Sand Ton 19,646 $27.00 $530,442.00
3Pit Price all reaches Ton 19,646 $9.00 $176,814.00
4 Monitoring: Turbidity & Environmental Surveys LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00
5 Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) / Truck Load Tracking LS 1 $16,000.00 $16,000.00
Sub‐Total $746,756.00
Contingency % 10% $74,675.60
ED & SA % 10% $74,675.60
Post‐Storm Assessments LS 1 $13,864.95 $13,864.95
Sub‐Total $163,216.15
R‐monument Signage Repair
6Surveyor Day 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
7Sign Replacement LS 10 $200.00 $2,000.00
Sub‐Total $3,500.00
Grand‐Total $913,472.15
Note 1. Assumes 1.5 tons is equivalent to 1 CY
2. Quantities reflect volume losses based on post storm surveys.
No.Item Units Unit Price
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
23 of 71
22
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
6. COLLIER CREEK NAVIGATION PROJECT
6.1 Description
Collier County maintains navigation through Collier Creek inlet under FDEP Permit No. 0309260-
001-JC and USACE Permit No. SAJ 1988-00290. The project location is shown in Figure 13.
The navigation channel at the inlet of the creek was last dredged in July 2016. The permitted
excavation template (Figure 12) of the channel is 1,100 feet long and 80 feet wide at the bottom
with side slopes of 6H: 1V extending up to the top of bank. The template has a dredge depth of -
11.3 feet, NAVD with a 1 foot overdredge allowance. The permitted template is shown in Figure
12 and Appendix G. The inlet is flanked by seawalls to the east and a short terminal groin to the
west, which were both damaged in the storm.
The inlet was dredged initially in 2001, when 24,100 CY of material was removed from the pass.
The initial layout of the navigation channel was set with the permit approving this work. The pass
was next dredged in 2012, when approximately 12.000 CY was removed. The latest dredging
occurred in 2016, with the removal of 11,900 CY.
Figure 12. Collier Creek Navigation Channel
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
24 of 71
23
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Figure 13. Collier Creek Navigation Project
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
25 of 71
24
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Figure 14. Collier Creek Terminal Jetty and Destroyed Seawall at Villa de Marco
6.2 Collier Creek Channel Maintenance
The storm conditions that caused damage to structures at the inlet of Collier Creek on Marco Island
also redistributed sediments within the Marco River and Collier Creek. The navigation channel at
the inlet of the creek experienced significant shoaling during the storm, as shown in Figure 14. In
addition, debris from the damaged structures was deposited within the channel. This includes the
finger piers and seawall shown in Figure 14 at Villa de Marco Condominiums, debris and stones
from the jetty.
6.3 Impacts & Damages
The inlet filled with sand and shell mixed with substantial debris. The channel infilling led to water
depths being decreased by 2 to 6 feet and has resulted in a navigation hazard. Based on post-storm
surveys it was estimated that approximately 12,000 CY of material, including sand and debris,
needs to be dredged to restore the channel to its permitted depth and width. This volume is based
on a recent pre-construction survey for the Emergency Dredging project (Appendix G). One
interesting fact from the recent surveys was a lot of the sand infilling the channel came from the
adjacent waterway and ebb shoal. This indicated that if the natural and permitted channels were
more closely aligned, the amount of dredging under both routine and post-storm conditions can be
reduced. A modeling study is currently underway to design this solution.
6.4 Repair Cost Estimates
Due to the emergency nature of the repairs to maintain navigation within the channel of Collier
Creek, emergency permits were issued by State and Federal agencies. The County selected the
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
26 of 71
25
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
low-bid contractor (Brance Construction) to perform the work. A Notice to Proceed was issued for
the emergency project on January 26, 2018 and construction commenced on January 29, 2018.
Cost estimates for the work necessary to assess and address storm impacts to the navigation
channel are provided in Table 9. The construction costs reflect the overall cost of the project as
bid by the contractor. The construction costs included mobilization, material excavation and
upland disposal, dredge surveys, and environmental monitoring. The cost estimate also includes
contingency, ED & SA, and post-storm assessments. ED & SA includes engineering, design,
permitting, and construction supervision and administration. Post-storm assessments includes
surveys, coordination, and engineering calculations to identify and quantify storm impacts. This
component is assessed a share of the post-storm assessment and the model effort to reduce the
shoal under routine and storm conditions. The resulting estimated cost to replace the storm losses
is $733,600.
Table 9. Collier Creek Channel Maintenance Repair Cost Estimate
No. Item Units
Unit Price Quantities Price
Collier Creek Navigation Channel
1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $150,000 $150,000
2 Material Excavation and Disposal
Dredging & Disposal CY 14,000 $27.27 $381,780
Debris Removal & Disposal Tons 1,000 $10.00 $10,000
Armor Stone Retrieval & Stockpile Tons 230 $10.00 $2,300
3 During & Post Dredge Surveys LS 1 $14,988 $14,988
4 Monitoring: Turbidity & Environmental Surveys Days 90 $111.12 $10,001
Sub‐Total $569,069
Contingency % 10% $56,907
ED & SA % 10% $83,395
Post‐Storm Assessments Share of Cost LS $24,264
Sub‐Total $164,565
Grand‐Total $733,634
Note: Quantities reflect volumes based on pre‐storm and Pre‐Construction Survey
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
27 of 71
26
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
7. NORTH COUNTY DUNES & VEGETATAION
7.1 Surveys & Data Collection
The surveys utilized to quantify impacts to the North County beaches and offshore profile were
also utilized to quantify the impacts to the Project Area’s dune system.
Topographic and bathymetric profile surveys of the beach were conducted by Sea Diversified Inc.
(SDI) in February 2017 to satisfy annual physical monitoring requirements. Aptim Environmental
& Infrastructure (APTIM) surveyors collected the post-storm surveys from September 25 to
October 7, 2017. The monitoring area included profile surveys at each of the published FDEP
reference monuments between R-17 and R-84 for the North County Project area. Profile surveys
were collected along the published azimuth and extended from the dune offshore to the DOC.
7.2 Impacts & Damages
Impacts and damages to the vegetation and dune system are discussed in this section and shown
in Figure 15 represent the measured changes as quantified through comparison of beach profile
surveys. This report presents the measured changes between surveys that were collected prior to
and following the storm (February and October 2017, respectively).
Figure 15. North County Dunes and Vegetation following Hurricane Irma
The dune system provides valuable protection to coastal infrastructure. The system is the landward
portion of the beach system that reduces overtopping and storm surge from propagating inland.
The dune vegetation provides protection to the dunes and encourages dune growth. The seaward
limit (toe) of the dune is based on comparisons of individual profiles and review of historical data
for the project area. The lower dune elevation for the North County Project Area is estimated to
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
28 of 71
27
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
be +4.5 feet, NAVD, and extends up to approximately 7 ft. NAVD in most locations. In order to
revegetate to pre-storm conditions, the dunes need to be restored as substrate for revegetation.
The net volume change to the dune between February 2017 (pre-storm) and October 2017 (post-
storm) was measured to be -21,984 cubic yards (CY) above the dune toe as shown in Table . Dune
response due to storm event vary alongshore; erosion impacts to the dune are unlikely to recover
quickly on their own and need immediate repair. Isolated segments of sand deposition within the
dune are unlikely to be reworked offsetting erosion to the dune realized in other segments of the
Project Area. The volume loss within the erosional segments of the Project Area (Erosion to Dune)
totaled 27,733 CY as shown in Table 10 and detailed in Appendix C.
The erosion to the dune was identified as the volume of sand lost attributed to the storm. For cost
estimating purposes the conversion factor between CY and tons was assumed to be 1.5 tons/CY.
Table 10. North County Dune Volume Changes
Dune vegetation, along with the sandy dune substrate it grows on, is in need of repair after
Hurricane Irma. Dune vegetation was lost along over 28,000 linear feet of shoreline based on the
retreat of the dune measured at the +4.75 feet, NAVD contour. Based on an average dune height
of 2.5 feet and the volume of sand lost from the dunes (27,700 CY), it was estimated that
approximately 300,000 square feet of dune was impacted within the North County Project Area.
Assuming a planting density of 2 plants per square foot to align with State dune vegetation planting
standards, approximately 600,000 plants are needed to quickly restore the dune vegetation lost
during the storm.
7.3 Repair Cost Estimates
Cost estimates for the work necessary to assess and address storm impacts to the dunes within the
North County Project Area are provided in Table 11. The cost estimate to replace sand lost due to
Hurricane Irma was based on obtaining material from the same upland sand source used for the
previous 2013/14, 2014 and 2016 renourishment projects by method of traditional truck haul.
Collier County has sand supply contracts in place with Stewart’s Immokalee Sand Mine with
negotiated sand costs. Actual construction bids for the 2016 County nourishment project for South
Project Reaches
Net Changes
to Dune
(CY)
Erosion
to Dune
(CY)
Vanderbilt ‐815 ‐3,345
Pelican Bay ‐8,129 ‐8,129
Park Shore ‐7,618 ‐7,715
Naples ‐5,423 ‐8,545
Total for Project Area ‐21,984 ‐27,733
Post‐Hurricane Irma Storm Impact Analysis
North County ‐ Dune Volume Changes
Feb 2017 vs. Oct 2017
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
29 of 71
28
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Marco Island, Park Shore, Pelican Bay and Vanderbilt that used an upland sand source were used
to develop these estimates. The unit price for supplying and installing dune vegetation was based
on typical regional prices for large installations. The cost estimate also includes contingency, ED
& SA, and post-storm assessments. ED & SA includes engineering, design, permitting, and
construction supervision and administration. Post-storm assessments includes surveys,
coordination, and engineering calculations to quantify storm impacts. The resulting estimated cost
to replace the storm losses is $2.05 million.
Table 11. North County Dune & Vegetation Repair Cost Estimate
No. Item Units
Unit Price
Quantities Price
North County Dunes & Vegetation
1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00
2 Park Shore ‐ Transport and Place Sand Ton 12,153 $16.35 $198,701.55
3 Vanderbilt ‐ Transport and Place Sand Ton 6,174 $15.75 $97,240.50
4 Pelican Bay ‐ Transport and Place Sand Ton 7,593 $16.85 $127,942.05
5 Naples ‐ Transport and Place Sand Ton 15,405 $17.50 $269,587.50
6 Pit Price all reaches Ton 41,325 $9.00 $371,925.00
7 Dune Vegetation Each 600,000 $0.90 $540,000.00
8 Monitoring: Environmental Surveys LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
9 Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) LS 1 $22,000.00 $22,000.00
Sub‐Total $1,682,396.60
Contingency % 10% $168,239.66
ED & SA % 10% $168,239.66
Post‐Storm Assessments LS 1 $26,308.74 $26,308.74
Sub‐Total $362,788.06
Grand‐Total $2,045,184.66
Note 1. Assumes 1.5 tons is equivalent to 1 CY
2. Quantities based on post storm surveys.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
30 of 71
29
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
8. COLLIER CREEK TERMINAL JETTY
Public coastal structures and private marine structures (i.e. docks and seawalls) within Collier
County were damaged during Hurricane Irma. The most prominent damage these types of
structures occurred on Marco Island at Collier Creek. A seawall, docks and other private coastal
features were damaged at Villa de Marco West Condominiums along the east bank at the inlet of
the navigation channel at Collier Creek (Figure 14). The County’s coastal structure (terminal jetty)
oriented northwest-southeast on the west bank at the inlet of navigation channel was also damaged.
A terminal jetty was constructed on the western bank of the inlet in 2005 oriented northwest-
southeast. The jetty was constructed of a steel sheet pile wall encased with armor stone. The rubble
mound structure had a length of approximately 250 feet, crest elevation of approximately 2.2 feet,
NGVD, and a crest width of 9 feet. The toe of the armor stone was -4 feet, NGVD in the 2004
permit drawings. The permitted structure template and plan views are shown in the plans in
Appendix G.
8.1 Surveys & Data Collection
Visual observations, measurements and photographs were used to assess damages to the terminal
jetty. Pre-storm conditions were based on historical photographs and permit record drawings. The
pre- and post-storm conditions were based on August and September/ October 2017 surveys, the
latter approximately one month following the storm event.
The USACE flew a LiDAR survey during the period of September 18 and September 25, 2017.
The next available LiDAR survey from the USACE was conducted in 2015. The LiDAR data was
reviewed, but the plan view limits of the surveys did not extend far enough east to cover Collier
Creek. A number of surveys of the inlet were taken in the last year. Transects from these surveys
crossed the terminal jetty at a number of locations, and provided the basis for estimating stone
losses and displacement from the jetty, supplementing aerial photography.
8.2 Impacts & Damages
The storm caused extreme and rapid tidal fluctuations and currents in the Marco River and Collier
Creek due to the storm’s intense winds and surge. Based on preliminary modeling calculations,
the currents within the inlet of Collier Creek reached 11 feet per second, driven by an 8 foot tidal
rise in 3 hours. A Marco River ADCP measured 9 fps currents nearby.
This condition damaged the County’s terminal jetty and other structures depositing debris and sand
into the inlet of Collier Creek. The seaward end of the jetty was damaged as evident by the steel
sheet pile core at the seaward end of the structure that had become exposed. It was determined that
the jetty lost approximately 30 feet of length as armor stones had been displaced and redistributed
(Figure 1616 and Appendix G). The height and top width at this portion of the structure was
estimated at 5 feet and 23 feet, respectively. Based on these dimensions, it was approximated that
310 tons of rock had been displaced from the structure. Damage was identified on other portions
of the jetty using recent topographic survey data. It appears the overtopping of the jetty removed
rock from the east side slope at the north and south ends of the jetty. Based on comparison of the
latest permit plans, the cap rock cover of the steel sheet piling has been uncovered. Only a small
portion of displaced armor stones have been located at the time of this report, but it is speculated
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
31 of 71
30
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
the armor stones were moved to the east into the inlet. Based on early dredging experience, the
displaced stones may not be economically recoverable.
Figure 16. Damaged Seaward End of Collier Creek Terminal Jetty
8.3 Repair Cost Estimates
Cost estimates for the work necessary to assess and address storm impacts to the County’s terminal
jetty at Collier Creek are provided in Table 12. Costs for jetty components, such as stone, mattress,
and mobilization was developed based on recent experience in County projects. The costs
associated with environmental monitoring (turbidity and species surveys) for environmental
compliance were included in the estimate. The cost estimate also includes contingency, ED & SA,
and post-storm assessments. ED & SA includes engineering, design, permitting, and construction
supervision and administration. Post-storm assessments includes surveys, coordination, and
engineering calculations to quantify storm impacts for restoration. The cost also includes a model
study to better align the natural and permitted channels to reduce routine and storm related
dredging. The resulting estimated cost to replace the storm losses is $362,400.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
32 of 71
31
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Table 12. Terminal Jetty Repair Cost Estimate
No. Item Units
Unit Price Quantities Price
Collier Creek Terminal Jetty
1 Mobilization/Demobilization LS 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00
2 Stone Replacement on Jetty Head Tons 173 $140.00 $24,220.00
3 Groin Slope Loss Repair with Stone Tons 122 $140.00 $17,080.00
4 Groin Crest Repair with Stone Tons 308 $140.00 $43,120.00
5 Marine Mattress Foundation SF 1,700 $28.00 $47,600.00
6 Monitoring: Turbidity & Environmental Surveys LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
Sub‐Total $302,020.00
Contingency % 10% $30,202.00
ED & SA % 10% $30,202.00
Sub‐Total $60,404.00
Grand‐Total $362,424.00
Note Stone with density of 150 lbs per cubic foot
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
33 of 71
32
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
9. Engineering for Long Term Mitigation of Collier Creek:
A modeling study is underway to identify actions needed to reduce or eliminate long term risk to
people and property from natural disasters in the vicinity of Collier Creek. The impact due the
storm currents and tides in the vicinity of Collier Creek caused failure of the adjacent seawall and
jetty and shoaling in the inlet. A survey found that the post-storm cut and fill calculation within
the inlet waterway and ebb shoal were nearly equally. A redesign of the inlet and jetty orientation
can bring the natural and permit alignment closer together, reducing damages and shoaling during
storms and day to day conditions.
Table 13. Mitigation Modeling for Collier Creek.
No. Item Units
Unit Price
Quantities Price
Engineering for Long Term Mitigation of Collier Creek
1 Collier Creek Modeling LS 1 $298,959.30 $298,959.30
2 Plans, Specifications & Permitting Tons 1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00
Sub‐Total $358,959.30
Contingency % 10% $35,895.93
Grand‐Total $394,855.23
10. Summary of Repair Cost Estimates
The 6 elements of the Collier County Coastal Program evaluated in this report are listed below
with the estimated cost for their restoration or repair. The total cost is $8.65 million.
Table 14. Summary of Grand-Totals for Hurricane Irma Impacts
No. Item
Grand‐Totals
1 North County (Vanderbilt, Park Shore, Pelican Bay and Naples) $4,191,421.70
2 South Marco Island $913,472.15
3 North County Dunes & Vegetation $2,045,184.66
4 Collier Creek Terminal Jetty $362,424.00
5 Collier Creek Navigation Channel $733,634.16
6 Engineering for Long Term Mitigation of Collier Creek $394,855.23
Total $8,640,991.90
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
34 of 71
33
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
11. REFERENCES
APTIM, 2017. Completion and Certification Statement for Collier County Beach Nourishment
Project submitted to Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Collier County,
Florida.
CB&I Coastal Planning & Engineering. Feasibility Study Collier Creek, Florida. March 2015
Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. May 2011. Collier County Conceptual Renourishment
Project Analysis, Collier County, Florida.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 2015. Collier County Nourishment, Permit No.
0331817-001-JC
Humiston & Moore Engineers, 2017. 2017 Post-Construction Monitoring Summary, Collier
County Beach Nourishment Project, Collier County, Florida.
Humiston & Moore Engineers, 2017. Four-Year Post-Construction Monitoring Summary, South
Marco Beach Nourishment Project, Collier County, Florida.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
35 of 71
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Appendix A
Collier County (North County) Beach Nourishment Profiles
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
36 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
37 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
38 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
39 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
40 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
41 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
42 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
43 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
44 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
45 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
46 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
47 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
48 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
49 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
50 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
51 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
52 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
53 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
54 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
55 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
56 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
57 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
58 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
59 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
60 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
61 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
62 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
63 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
64 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
65 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
66 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
67 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
68 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
69 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
70 of 71
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-6 New Business
71 of 71
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Appendix B
Collier County (North County) Beach Nourishment Post-Storm Photographs
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Photograph 1: North Park Shore Beach with marks on the over walk piles showing a 1.5 foot
drop in beach elevation.
Photograph 2. Narrow beach section in Naples with over washed dune vegetation.
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Photograph 3. Remnant dunes and scarps.
Photograph 4. Narrowed Beach section in Park Shore.
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Appendix C
Collier County (North County) Beach Nourishment Volume Change Tables
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Appendix D
South Marco Island Nourishment Profiles
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Appendix E
South Marco Island Nourishment Post-Storm Photographs
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Photograph 1. Rocks displaced by storm at South Marco.
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Appendix F
APTIM Survey Certification & LiDAR Metadata
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Appendix G
Collier Creek Area Damage Photographs and
Selected Construction and Permit Plan Sheets
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Photo 1. Collier Creek Entrance May 2017
Photo 2. Collier Creek Entrance September 13, 2017
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Photo 3. Damaged Seawall and Collier Creek Jetty post storm.
Photo 4. Collier Creek Channel Infilling Post Storm.
APTIM ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Photo 5. Collier Creek Terminal Jetty Post Storm
1
To: 2018 FSBPA BeachWatch Members
From: Debbie Flack
Date: March 14, 2018
2018 BEACHWATCH LEGISLATIVE SESSION WRAP-UP
It is over — officially Sunday afternoon at 4:16 pm with passage of the $88.7 billion Conference
Report on HB 5001 (the FY 2018/19 budget), along with the smallest tax package during
Governor Scott’s tenure ($168 M). This session will be remembered by the exceptionally,
perhaps historically or at least since 2002, high number of bills filed and lowest number of bills
passed. 3190 bills were filed and less than 200 bills passed. Separate House and Senate
budgets were passed February 7, and then a week later, with the Marjorie Stoneman Douglas
High School tragedy everything else faded into the background, as it properly took over budget
negotiations and floor time. Yet, funding for Florida’s beaches survived and was in fact
highlighted in the last few days as one of the “winners” in the budget –
AP’s “10 Things to Know about Florida’s New Budget”
— ENVIRONMENT: More than $100 million was included in the budget for Florida
Forever, the state's program to purchase environmentally-sensitive land. This is the
largest amount set aside for the program since the Great Recession. The budget also
includes $50 million for springs restoration and more than $60 million for beach
restoration programs, including more than $11 million for beaches damaged by
Hurricane Irma.
With weekly BeachWatch Updates and frequent Budget Alerts throughout Session, it is not
necessary to revisit in detail how we got to the final FY 2018/19 funding allocation for the
statewide Beach Management Program beyond major highlights and policy implications that
are important to emphasize in charting the course and strategy going forward. Actual budget
excerpts from the Conference Report on HB 5001 follow.
____________________________________________________
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
1 of 10
2
Appropriations
I. Statewide Beach Management Funding
By Week 3, we started in both the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on the Environment
and Natural Resources and the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Appropriations
Subcommittee with very supportive funding recommendations for the program. The House
included $54.5M for the traditional program including a few local projects that were part of
their separate member appropriations process. The Chair’s (Rep. Ben Albritton)
Recommendation preserved the current year $29.5M recurring Amendment 1’s Land
Acquisition Trust Fund (LATF) allocation, with $25M in non-recurring trust funds. The House
also provided $25M in non-recurring General Revenue (GR) as a separate line-item for Irma
beach recovery funding.
The Senate Subcommittee Chair’s (Sen. Lauren Book) Recommendation fully addressed FSBPA’s
overriding goal for the 2018 session—$50M for the traditional statewide program all from a
single recurring funding source, LATF. There was no Hurricane Irma funding included. This,
each with distinct proviso and member projects, is what ultimately passed the House (HB 5001)
and Senate (SB 2500) in Week 5, and subsequently served as the comparative side-by side for
the Conference Process that officially began February 28. Given the unforeseen impacts to the
appropriations process post-Parkland, beaches were fortunate that despite a couple of
differences in approaches and content between the two budgets—mix of LATF dollars and
supplemental Irma funding—there were far more similarities than usual going into Conference.
While the process itself dragged on over a number of days, causing a Sunday vs. Friday sine die,
the beach funding mix was resolved at the second subcommittee pass. Beach-related bump
issues— storm damage recovery funding, member project-adds, and proviso tweaks— were
addressed at the first (of many) meeting between Chairs Trujillo and Bradley.
The Details regarding the Traditional Statewide Beach Budget for 2018/19
(Excerpts from the Conference Report on HB 5001, with FSBPA annotations in red)
1597 GRANTS AND AIDS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND NONSTATE ENTITIES - FIXED CAPITAL
OUTLAY BEACH PROJECTS – STATEWIDE
FROM LAND ACQUISITION TRUST FUND . . 50,000,000
From the funds in Specific Appropriation 1597, $29,493,889 in
recurring funds and $20,506,111 in nonrecurring funds are provided for
the Department of Environmental Protection’s Beach Management Funding
Assistance Program (BMFAP) Local Government Funding Requests for Fiscal
Year 2018-2019, pursuant to section 161.101, Florida Statutes, for Beach
Restoration/Nourishment and Inlet Sand Bypassing/Inlet Management Plan
Implementation Projects Lists.
Funds in Specific Appropriation 1597 shall be provided for Beach
Restoration and Nourishment projects on the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 list,
in priority order. Funds projects 1-20 (short $16.5K) and all post construction monitoring noted in paragraph 4
Totals: $35,250,000
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
2 of 10
3
Funds in Specific Appropriation 1597 shall be provided for Inlet Sand
Bypassing and Inlet Management Plan Implementation projects including
post-construction monitoring, in priority order, based on the amount of
inlet funding requested as a percentage of the total statewide funding
requested. This is 29.5% of the $50M appropriation or $14,750,000 and includes
Inlet projects 1-4 and part of #5, and post-construction monitoring at 50%.
Funds in Specific Appropriation 1597 shall be provided for all
post-construction monitoring projects for Beach Restoration/Nourishment
and Inlet Sand Bypassing/Inlet Management projects, to be cost-shared
equally, in the BMFAP. All monitoring costs are included in the two above project
category totals-beaches and inlets. This monitoring subcategory totals $1.3M--
$841,352 for beaches and $454,400 for inlets.
Any remaining unencumbered surplus funds shall be available for beach
and inlet management projects in continued priority order. (New conference
direction to agency)
Funds in Specific Appropriation 1597 shall not be provided for any
activities related to beach nourishment utilizing offshore sand sources
from Martin and St. Lucie counties for the Dade County Shore Protection
Project. Any funds in Specific Appropriation 1597 to the Surfside
Segment/Dade County Shore Protection Project included in the Department
of Environmental Protection’s Beach Management Funding Assistance
Program Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Local Government Funding Requests may only
utilize upland sand sources.
1597A GRANTS AND AIDS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND
NONSTATE ENTITIES - FIXED CAPITAL OUTLAY
GRANTS AND AIDS - BAL HARBOUR VILLAGE
BAKERS HAULOVER INLET BYPASSING
FROM GENERAL REVENUE FUND . . . . . 750,000
The nonrecurring funds in Specific Appropriation 1597A are provided for
the Bal Harbour Village Bakers Haulover Inlet Bypassing Project (HB
4109)(Senate Form 1909).
1599A GRANTS AND AIDS TO LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS AND NONSTATE ENTITIES - FIXED
CAPITAL OUTLAY SAINT JOSEPH PENINSULA
BEACH RESTORATION
FROM LAND ACQUISITION TRUST FUND . . 1,000,000
The nonrecurring funds in Specific Appropriation 1599A are
provided for the St. Joseph Peninsula Beach Restoration and
Preservation of Cape San Blas Road (HB 3715).
(Specific projects and funding amounts from the FY 2018/19 LGFR are attached)
Proviso captures the intent of a number of substantive provisions in the Coastal Management
Bill (SB 174) for FY 2018/19. Especially important, and one of our BeachWatch stated objectives,
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
3 of 10
4
was increased funding emphasis on inlet management, especially major construction
components. Proviso also requires the same level of state cost-sharing for post-construction
monitoring of both beach and inlet projects, and addresses the bill’s intent regarding
reprogramming of funds to both beach and inlet projects in continued priority order. This may
take on a to-be-determined benefit from the anticipated generous federal funding associated
with Irma for a number of projects addressed by the $50M allocation, freeing dollars to
continue funding in priority order down both lists. Proviso is clearly consistent with existing
statute.
Looking Back and Moving Forward: Let’s not Forget
Despite clear and early indications, especially from the Appropriations Chair, Senator Bradley,
regarding the status of the Land Acquisition Trust Fund, for the several weeks between
unveiling the Senate budget until Conference our advocacy agenda was driven by Senate
budget language on Beach Management that read “$50,000,000 in recurring funds from the
Land Acquisition Trust Fund is provided.”
We all knew from Senate committee discussion and documents that pre-session estimates
indicated there was only a $43M surplus between the 33% estimated documentary stamp/LATF
estimated allocation of $862.2M , and the FY 2018/19 base budget (that includes beaches
recurring $29.5M). Early on, we saw Senate bills allocating $100M for Florida Forever, another
$25M for springs on top of the existing $50M, $50 M for St John’s River/ Keystone Heights that
passed the Senate with recurring allocations in Ch. 375. Collectively bills seeking recurring LATF
would have required $260M—including beaches additional $20.5M. Math didn’t work— with
an additional LATF dollar “ask” of $260M, and as noted above, an estimated unencumbered
surplus of just $43M. However, this didn’t stop us and every other resource group from trying,
and directing our efforts towards the House in anticipation of the Budget Conference.
The House had no proposed increases in recurring LATF. And that is how it ended, even before
Conference, when allocations were released that did not include any new recurring LATF. For
perspective, the final Florida Forever allocation for state land acquisition of $101M is all non-
recurring General Revenue, no LATF. Other legitimate environmental needs didn’t get funds
from any source; others reduced funding but not recurring. (On a more positive note, the
Resilient Coastline Initiative received funding of $3.6 M in GR.)
This pent up and justifiable demand for LATF funding will be back again next session, especially
since none of the bills with LATF allocations passed. With regard to our beach program, we
have frequently argued that the recurring component is important to leveraging federal/ local
dollars, working through the regulatory maze, and project timing . It may be time to
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
4 of 10
5
acknowledge that the importance of securing recurring dollars in statute vs. the appropriations
process may be exaggerated— apparently there are no guarantees.
Beaches were winners, securing over $50 million for a second year in a row during a very
difficult session. How far have we come? Just 2 years ago, for FY 16/17, the beach program
received a total appropriation of $32.6M. The program received its first recurring allocation of
trust funds of $10.1M-- with total LATF funding of S21.2M, reinforced by $11.1M in non-
recurring GR. You have seen the numbers for the current year (17/18) appropriation of $50M,
$29.5M in recurring LATF with the remaining $20.5M in General Revenue. These two amounts
have not changed for next fiscal year 18/19, but the source of the $20.5M has, from non-
recurring General Revenue to non-recurring LATF. The legislative allocation for statewide
beach program is all LATF for the first time. Not sure this has any substantive impact on future
funding.
II: IRMA STORM DAMAGE RECOVERY
1594 FIXED CAPITAL OUTLAY HURRICANE BEACH RECOVERY
FROM GENERAL REVENUE FUND . . . . . 5,868,024
FROM LAND ACQUISITION TRUST FUND . . 5,330,258
The nonrecurring funds in Specific Appropriation 1594 are provided for
the purpose of implementing beach and dune repair and restoration
projects in response to the damages caused by Hurricane Irma. These
funds shall be placed in reserve until October 1, 2018, when they will
be available as state match to federal funds. The department is
authorized to submit budget amendments on or after October 1, 2018, to
request the release of funds pursuant to the provisions of chapter 216,
Florida Statutes.
The funds shall be used as necessary state match to federal funds, or
otherwise provide for up to 50 percent of the beach and dune restoration
costs where federal assistance is not provided. Counties impacted by
Hurricane Irma that are interested in receiving this funding must submit
a detailed scope of work to the Beach Management Funding Assistance
Program before October 1, 2018. In evaluating this funding, the
Department shall prioritize state match to federal funds and
proportionately distribute the remaining funds among the areas most
critically impacted by Hurricane Irma.
As noted in our legislative handouts and presentations, one of FSBPA’s four objectives for the
2018 session was to assist coastal communities with Hurricane Irma storm damage recovery,
supporting a separate, one-time state appropriation for local government sponsors to match
Congressional (USACE and FEMA) supplemental funding for beaches. FSBPA gave presentations
on the funding need for storm damaged beaches to the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
5 of 10
6
on Environment and Natural Resources (Oct) and the House Select Committee on Hurricane
Response and Preparedness (Dec.), focusing on funding needs trying to reinforce the $50
million the Governor had recommended last session for Matthew and this session for Irma. It
was a starting point for discussion.
The state fell far short on hurricane recovery funding— the final Conference Report, as
presented above, includes a separate line-item appropriation of $11.2M with accompanying
proviso. Now, we can only hope and anticipate a substantial federal contribution to the repair
of Florida’s beaches impacted by Irma through the Corps and FEMA.
This is another failure, similar but perhaps worse than Matthew, to provide the Legislature with
enough and timely information to make informed decisions, and to justify significant
appropriations for beach recovery in a very difficult year, especially given the extensive and
varied damages associated with Hurricane Irma.
DEP’s untimely estimated cost document that far exceeded reasonable funding, provided no
reliable costs, or guidance on prioritizing, and was too late to be seriously reconsidered.* That
left us with proviso in the Governor’s budget recommendation with the only addition being
the legislative requirement to hold funds in reserves until October 1, 2018.
It may be time for formal discussion among governmental partners regarding the state’s
capabilities to capture the costs and priorities of identifying preliminary beach recovery needs
in order to effectively input the next appropriations process, rather than state agencies pointing
the finger at FEMA and the Corps, as well as questioning the reliability of information provided
of local governments and coastal communities.
(*It included $200M in total costs, no recommendations or guidance on prioritizing, and FEMA’s “emergency berm
protection” standard of 6 c.y per linear foot and a statewide cost of $35 per cubic yard was used, except for the
Keys. This includes over 118 miles of engineered nonfederal beaches (Category G) for 55 projects, but provides no
guidance or insight regarding impacted federally-authorized projects.)
COASTAL MANAGEMENT LEGISLATION (SB 174, HUKILL)
We can sum up this journey quite simply— it ended better than it started. The interest and
support for the bill remains widespread. Getting through the Senate substantive and
appropriations committees during early committee weeks in October and November, it was
easy to think the road ahead was short, could be successful, but there were still no easy
answers for getting the House bill heard. When the Senate bill sponsor resigned just before
session began, all expectations for getting SB 174 heard vanished. It was frustrating to hear the
frequent comments regarding, “good policy, bad politics” but it was the truth which didn’t offer
many options. Time apparently helped as did a gracious new Senate sponsor. Senator Dorothy
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
6 of 10
7
Hukill (portions of Volusia and Brevard), quietly and effectively presented SB 174 on February
1, at its last committee stop, and again shortly thereafter when it passed the Senate – 6
unanimous committee stops and two floor votes. When it went to the House in Messages, it
had not been heard in the committee of reference, and it was no longer meeting. The next
week (2/6) a few “rewritten” provisions of SB 174 were amendments to the House bill (7063)
on Florida Forever. Arguably, it put the coastal legislation in play.
The games began, but finally ended last Friday (3/8). No paths forward were realized. There
was interest in adding Coastal Management to HB 7063, the massive Florida Forever package,
but it had its own problems and ultimately was not heard on the floor of the House. Other
options were limited by time. An effort was made to get SB 174, in messages, up on the House
Special Order Calendar but it had all kinds of procedural issues since it hadn’t been heard
anywhere in the House this session. There were one or two other possible bills that kept us
chasing a vehicle but by last Friday it was time to stop—it never bodes well for garnering future
support to put other legislation in jeopardy. This was never more true than for the 2018
Session when so few bills passed.
For better or worse this coastal management legislation has a life of its own, simply because
most agree with the necessity of an improved statutory framework to justify increased funding.
Our beach coalition stood together, in full expressed support, at its 8 committee stops (2 in
House in 2017 Session) with the only amendment this session being removal of the final section
on LATF funding. (See Diana’s bill summary for failure of all bills seeking LATF allocations
pursuant to Ch. 375)
GOING FORWARD
In the months ahead FSBPA, through the Board of Directors and staff, will begin to develop a
framework for what we hope and intend will be a productive 2019 session. We have time.
Much of our strategy and objectives will be in place, simply awaiting targeted, strategic
adjustments. Elections and change in leadership will certainly impact most committee chairs.
This is the wrap-up. We need to digest the events and accomplishments of this session. We
certainly could not have gotten where we are without a number of legislative pitch hitters,
especially Senators Hukill and Book, and clearly Senate and House appropriations chairs. Please
appreciate how well Florida’s beaches fared despite this most difficult session. Sustaining $50
million was not a certainty.
Thank you once again for supporting and participating in BeachWatch. Our shared success over
the years reflects the level of cooperation, coordination and the mutual efforts of FS BPA and
our “coalition of beach interests”, especially you, our BeachWatch local government members
including elected officials, the beach program folks, in-house and contract lobbyists, and
community interests. This alone should give us encouragement to continue to message and
promote Florida’s beaches. A “repeat” is reason to celebrate.
Diana’s (Ferguson, FSBPA Legislative Services, Rutledge-Ecenia) bill tracking summary follows:
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
7 of 10
8
__________________________________________________________
Budget Items of Interest
Non-beach related budget items of interest include:
Florida Resilient Coastline Initiative - $3.6M
Florida Forever and related land acquisition programs - $101M
Florida Forever - $77M
Florida Communities Trust - $10M
FRDAP - $6M
Rural and Family Lands - $6M
Working Waterfronts - $2M
Everglades Restoration - $248M
Legislation of Interest that Passed
Coral Reefs
HB 53 by Representative Jacobs was signed by the Officers and presented to the Governor on
March 9. The Governor has until March 24 to act on this bill. The bill establishes the Southeast
Florida Coral Reef Ecosystem Conservation Area.
Environmental Regulation
HB 1149 by Representative Payne has passed both chambers and goes next to the Governor for
final action. This bill contains provisions related to reclaimed water, solid waste recycling, dock
and pier permitting, mitigation banking, environmental resource permits, and the C-51. An
amendment was proposed by Representative Ingoglia on the House floor that would have
indefinitely postponed advanced wastewater treatment requirements in Priority Focus Areas
surrounding springs. This amendment was withdrawn. Additional amendments surfaced late in
session that would have authorized a six month delay of the septic requirements; however, this
language was not amended to any bill. As such, the septic requirements will go into effect on
July 1, 2018. Additionally, there was an amendment by Senator Farmer to add a fracking ban to
the bill, but it was withdrawn.
State Assumption of Federal 404 Permitting Authority
HB 7043 by the House Natural Resources and Conservation Lands Subcommittee and
Representative Raschein has passed both chambers and goes next to the Governor for final
action. The bill authorizes the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to pursue
assumption of federal 404 permitting. There will need to be rulemaking and memoranda of
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
8 of 10
9
agreement with the Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency in order
for DEP to assume federal permitting responsibilities.
Legislation of Interest that Failed
Land Acquisition Trust Fund (LATF)
SB 204 by Senator Bradley would have provided $50M annually from the LATF for St. Johns
River restoration or Keystone Heights. It was amended to prohibit LATF from being used to pay
certain agency administrative expenses. The bill passed the Senate and died in House messages,
as it did not have a companion.
SB 370 by Senator Bradley would have provided $100M annually for the Florida Forever Trust
Fund from the LATF. It passed the Senate and died in House messages. The companion, HB
1353 by Representative Beshears, did not receive a hearing.
HB 7063 by the House Government Accountability Committee and Representative Caldwell
would have provided zero dollars in the current budget year for Florida Forever, but would have
scaled up from $57M beginning next year to $200M over the course of several years. HB 7063
also contained numerous policy changes. It would have split the Florida Forever distribution
into thirds, with 1/3 going to Rural and Family Lands, 1/3 for the traditional Florida Forever
program and water management districts combined, and 1/3 for Florida Communities Trust. It
also contained numerous other policy related provisions, and at one point contained language
that would have required intervenors in environmental administrative cases to pay attorney fees
simply for losing, without consideration of whether the intervenor exhibited an improper purpose
in joining the case. This language would have had a significant chilling effect on potential
intervenors in environmental cases. While this language was removed, the bill ultimately failed
to pass the full House.
HB 339 by Representative Harrell and SB 786 by Senator Mayfield would have provided $50M
annually to the Indian River Lagoon from the LATF. Neither bill received a hearing.
Tourist Development Tax
HB 585 by Representative Fine and SB 658 by Senator Brandes expanded the allowable uses of
tourist development tax dollars. HB 585 died in Senate messages. SB 658 died in the Senate
Appropriations Committee. However, the provisions of these bills ultimately passed in HB
7087, the tax package.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
9 of 10
10
Economic Development and Tourism Promotion
HB 3 by Representative M. Grant and SB 1714 by Senator Perry related to economic
development and tourism promotion accountability. HB 3 died in Senate messages. SB 1714
died in committee.
Fracking
HB 237 by Representative Peters and SB 462 by Senator Young would have banned fracking in
Florida. SB 462 died in its last committee. HB 237 did not receive a hearing. An amendment
by Senator Farmer to HB 1149 would have added the fracking ban to the environmental
regulation package, but it was withdrawn.
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
10 of 10
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program FY 2018-19 Local Government Funding Requests
BEACH RESTORATION AND NOURISHMENT PROJECTS
Total
$2,431,650
$475,000
$1,050,000
$275,000
$17,884,878
$2,613,587
$200,000
$14,635,917
$520,000
$14,600,000
$60,000
$400,000
$8,135,000
$1,250,000
$19,000,000
$600,000
15 Mid-Reach Segment - Brevard
County Shore
Protection Project
Brevard County
Construction
(Mitigation)$0 $300,000 $300,000 $26,213,953
13 Delray Beach Segment -
Palm Beach County Shore
Protection Project
City of Delray Beach
Design $704,125 $272,937 $272,938 $18,503,953
14 Phipps Ocean Park Beach
Nourishment
Town of Palm Beach Construction $0 $7,410,000 $11,590,000 $25,913,953
11 Ocean Ridge Segment - Palm Beach
County Shore Protection Project
Palm Beach County
Design $194,800 $102,600 $102,600 $16,427,516
12 Surfside Segment - Dade County
Shore Protection Project
Miami-Dade County
Construction $4,528,000 $1,803,500 $1,803,500 $18,231,016
9 Jupiter/Carlin Segment - Palm
Beach County Shore Protection
Project
Palm Beach County
Construction $0 $7,300,000 $7,300,000 $16,312,166
10 North Boca Raton Segment - Palm
Beach County Shore
Protection Project
City of Boca Raton
Design $34,500 $12,750 $12,750 $16,324,916
7 Martin County Shore Protection
Project Martin County Design,
Construction $7,100,000 $3,451,450 $4,084,467 $8,752,166
8 Lovers Key Beach Nourishment Lee County Design $0 $260,000 $260,000 $9,012,166
5 Panama City Beaches Shore
Protection Project (2)Bay County Design,
Construction $0 $986,367 $1,627,220 $5,224,716
6 St. Joseph Peninsula Beach
Nourishment Gulf County Design $0 $76,000 $124,000 $5,300,716
3 South Amelia Island Beach
Nourishment (3)Nassau County Design $33,928 $97,296 $143,776 $1,508,878
4 Duval County Shore Protection
Project
City of Jacksonville Construction $12,063,870 $2,729,471 $3,091,537 $4,238,349
1 Fort Pierce Shore Protection
Project (2)St. Lucie County Construction $369,000 $53,000 $53,000 $894,352
2 North and South Reaches - Brevard
County Shore Protection Project Brevard County Construction $0 $517,230 $532,770 $1,411,582
Rank Project Local Sponsor Project Phase Federal State Local Cumulative State
Total
Post-Construction Monitoring (1)Various Monitoring $313,569 $841,352 $1,276,729 $841,352
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
1 of 4
$14,950,000
$1,314,153
$225,000
$150,000
$2,484,000
$1,878,424
$1,936,100
$4,675,000
$166,585
$800,000
$61,755
$850,000
$1,203,000
$1,500,000
$400,000
$250,000
$116,975,049
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program FY 2018-19 Local Government Funding Requests
BEACH RESTORATION AND NOURISHMENT POST-CONSTRUCTION MONITORING
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
FUNDS REQUESTED:
Funds will be used to support the following projects identified in priority order. First year monitoring required by permit is included in the construction funds on the Beach Projects list.
This category serves to provide funding for monitoring activities associated with previously constructed projects. Eligible program activities include physical and biological
monitoring required by permit.
TOTAL $27,934,771 $40,005,130 $49,035,148
30 Volusia County Feasibility Study Volusia County Feasibility $0 $200,000 $200,000 $39,755,130
31 Regional Monitoring DEP Monitoring $0 $250,000 $0 $40,005,130
28 South Ponte Vedra/Vilano Beach
Federal Design St. Johns County Design $277,000 $147,975 $778,025 $39,017,230
29 Singer Island Shore Protection
Project
Palm Beach County Construction $0 $537,900 $962,100 $39,555,130
27 Southern Palm Beach Island
Restoration
Palm Beach County Feasibility, Design $0 $413,000 $437,000 $38,869,255
25 Coral Cove Park Dune
Nourishment
Palm Beach County Construction $0 $400,000 $400,000 $38,425,378
26 Mexico Beach Feasibility Study Bay County Feasibility $0 $30,877 $30,878 $38,456,255
23 Vero Beach Feasibility Study (3)Indian River County Feasibility, Design,
Construction $938,904 $1,748,751 $1,987,345 $37,942,085
24 South Jupiter Beach Feasibility
Study
Palm Beach County Feasibility $0 $83,293 $83,292 $38,025,378
21 Key Biscayne Beach Nourishment Village of Key
Biscayne
Feasibility, Design,
Construction $0 $911,036 $967,388 $36,177,483
22 Hillsboro Beach Nourishment Town of Hillsboro
Beach
Design,
Construction $1,302,075 $15,851 $618,174 $36,193,334
19 Anna Maria Island Beach
Nourishment (Non-federal)Manatee County Feasibility $0 $75,000 $75,000 $34,306,381
20 South Boca Raton Beach
Nourishment
City of Boca Raton Design,
Construction $0 $960,066 $1,523,934 $35,266,447
17 Mid-Town Beach Nourishment (2)Town of Palm Beach Construction $0 $538,146 $776,007 $34,189,599
18 Jupiter Island Beach Nourishment Town of Jupiter Island Design,
Construction $0 $41,782 $183,218 $34,231,381
16 Juno Beach Nourishment Palm Beach County Design,
Construction $75,000 $7,437,500 $7,437,500 $33,651,453
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
2 of 4
(1) Funding request is for reimbursement of a shortfall balance for projects that received a previous appropriation but had a remaining eligible state share balance.
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program FY 2018-19 Local Government Funding Requests
INLET SAND BYPASSING/INLET MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROJECTS
Rank Cumulative
State Total
$681,600
1 $8,739,975
2 $14,037,662
3 $14,348,912
4
$14,420,011
5 $15,788,761
6 $16,468,261
7 $16,584,511
8
$16,742,985
Estero Bay Regional Inlet
Management
Study
Lee County Feasibility $0 $158,474 $52,824 $211,298
TOTAL $15,628,500 $16,742,985 $5,580,994 $37,952,479
Fort Pierce IMP
Implementation (2)St. Lucie County Construction $0 $679,500 $226,500 $906,000
Boca Raton IMP
Implementation City of Boca Raton Design, Construction $0 $116,250 $38,750 $155,000
East Pass Inlet
Management
Study (2)
Okaloosa County Feasibility $0 $71,099 $23,699 $94,798
Wiggins Pass Inlet
Management Study Collier County Design, Construction $0 $1,368,750 $456,250 $1,825,000
Port Everglades IMP
Implementation (2)Broward County Construction $0 $5,297,687 $1,765,896 $7,063,583
Pensacola Pass Inlet
Management Study Escambia County Feasibility $0 $311,250 $103,750 $415,000
Total
Post Construction
Monitoring (1)Various Monitoring $0 $681,600 $227,200 $908,800
St. Lucie IMP
Implementation Martin County Construction $15,628,500 $8,058,375 $2,686,125 $26,373,000
TOTAL $313,569 $841,352 $1,276,729 $2,431,650
Project Name Local Sponsor Project Phase Federal State Local
Jupiter Island Beach Nourishment $0 $38,997 $171,003 $210,000
South Siesta Key Beach Nourishment $0 $82,620 $117,380 $200,000
Central Boca Raton Beach Nourishment (1)$0 $14,812 $20,188 $35,000
Mid-Town Beach Nourishment $0 $33,988 $49,012 $83,000
Segment II - Broward County Shore Protection
Project $244,451 $81,113 $118,085 $443,649
Phipps Ocean Park Beach Nourishment $0 $27,690 $43,310 $71,000
Pensacola Beach Nourishment $0 $100,500 $100,500 $201,000
Delray Beach Segment - Palm Beach County Shore
Protection Project $69,118 $26,792 $26,791 $122,701
Panama City Beaches Shore Protection Project $0 $205,683 $339,317 $545,000
St. Joseph Peninsula Beach Nourishment $0 $95,000 $155,000 $250,000
Fort Pierce Shore Protection Project $0 $130,000 $130,000 $260,000
South Amelia Island Beach Nourishment $0 $4,157 $6,143 $10,300
Project Federal State Local Total
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
3 of 4
(2) Funding request is for reimbursement of a shortfall balance for projects that received a previous appropriation but had a remaining eligible state share balance.
Beach Management Funding Assistance Program FY 2018-19 Local Government Funding Requests
INLET MANAGEMENT POST-CONSTRUCTION MONITORING
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
FUNDS REQUESTED:
Funds will be used to support the following projects identified in priority order.
(1) Funding request is for reimbursement of a shortfall balance for projects that received a previous appropriation but had a remaining eligible state share balance.
(1) Environmental and physical monitoring required by state and federal permits has been consolidated on the Post–construction Monitoring list. A total of four previously constructed projects require monitoring activities for FY 2018-19. A
complete monitoring project listing can be found on Page 11.
This category serves to provide funding for monitoring activities associated with previously constructed projects. Eligible program activities include physical and biological
monitoring required by permit.
St. Lucie IMP Implementation $0 $337,500 $112,500 $450,000
TOTAL $0 $681,600 $227,200 $908,800
South Lake Worth IMP Implementation (1)$0 $120,000 $40,000 $160,000
Boca Raton IMP Implementation $0 $16,350 $5,450 $21,800
Post Construction Monitoring Federal
Cost
State cost Local cost Total
Lake Worth IMP Implementation $0 $207,750 $69,250 $277,000
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-7 New Business
4 of 4
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-8 New Business
1 of 2
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-8 New Business
2 of 2
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-8 New Business
1 of 3
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-8 New Business
2 of 3
CAC April 12, 2018
VIII-8 New Business
3 of 3