Loading...
BCC Minutes 05/17/1988 R f,!', . .,; I'~:" ton_Jug _ra pr-..t, ,* : ,It .apl.., Florida, May 17, 1988 t.E'f IT BE JU!1IJuusIRED, that the Board of County Coaai..ioner. in 8D4 for the County of Collier, and al80 acting a. the Board of Zoning Appeal. aDd.. the governing board(.) of euch epecial di.tricts a. bave beeD created according to law and having conducted bu8ine.. here1D" Mt on thi. date at 9:00 A.M. in RZG17LAJt sa.IOJr in Building .W. of the GoYernaent Center, Eaet .aple., Florida, w1th the CØAIRMAJf : VICE-cJlAIRMAa: Arnold Lee 01... Burt L. Saunder. Max A. 1Ia8.., 3r. 30M A. P1.tor Anne Goodnight ALSO PRES£Jrr: .1.... C. G11e., Clerk: 30hft Yonko.ky, Winance Director: Ellie Boffaan and Maureen hnyon" Deputy Clerke: .eJl Don111, COaDty Manager; Brian Machnzie, A8.i.tant to the County ~r" I8D CUyler, County Attorney: To. Crandall, OtJl1tie. &A.in1.t:rator; George Archibald, Public Horke Ac1aJni.trator; &ev1D O'Donnell" Public Service. Adaini.trator; Leo Oche" Ad8JDJ.trat1ve Service. Adainistrator; 3ett Perry" MPO Director: Tom Olliff" Acting Co88UDity DeveloP8ent Adainiatrator, David Heet., Planner: .ancy I.raelson, A4ainiatrative Aaaiatant to the Board; and Depaty Chief Ray Barnett, Sheriff'. Departaent. .. 114,~ 139 Page 1 . . X,.', .hpeft ltea n MAY 17,1988 AODD& um CODbT AGElmA - ~ WITS CHAJlau ~ls.jon.r Pi.tor aoved, seconded by Coaais.ioner Saunders and carried 1ID8Di80U81y, that the agenðaa and consent agenda be approved with the following changes: It- HA4 It- HD5 It.. -12C Itea -12D It- -1484 It- ftA DJ.CU..ion of .eJ_Jc perait tor Shell Me. tern E a P, Inc. - Added. DiscussJon regarding i8p08ition of water restric- tJons by South Florida Mater Manageaent District Mc:te4 . Discussion of reque.t by Collier County Bar Association regarding Collier County Law L1brary FuD4ing - Added. Approval of Re801utioD encouraging the Edison CO88Unity College Board ot Trustees to aaJntaJn the Collier County Branch of Edison Co88UDity College as their top priority for Capital Iaprove..nts - Added. RuolutJoD awarding a CertitJcate of Public Convenience and .ece.sJty to Beach Club of Marco Hotel - ContJnued to 5/24/88. DIPr.OYD SD~.Ica AJlfAJU)S - PUSb;¡-&U Co8aJ.sJoner Gla.. pre.ented Mr. Leroy Martel ot the Building Code CoIIpl1ance Departaent an bployee Service Award for 5 years ot .ervice with Colli.r County. Page 2 MAY 17" 1988 Vpoa r--ttDg of the procl_t1OD, CoaaJ..Jcmer 01... 80984, .co -4e4 b7 eo-l_JODer Sa1mder. and carrJed 1m8DJIIOU81y, that the 8døpt8d. Proc~1oD de81patiDg M8y 20th and 21.t, 1988" .. 'PoPJn Days' be I0OI( 114PKf145 Page 3 ..'f/I~ 1 ..' PJIOf!r~.nOlf DaIGJrA'1TJIQ 'I'D WKU ow MAT 18m - 218'f. 1988 AS .COLLIER g)CJ)jÎ~J( 2OCJtiSll 1mInr. - ADOP'f&U MAT 17" 1988 Øpoø readJng ot the proclaaat1on. CoaaJ..1oner P1.tor 1IOV'84, ..C~ b7 c.-SeeJ0D8r GoodnJght aDd carried ~111O1181y, that the t1DD de8JgD8tiDg the week of May 18~ - 21.t, 1988.. .Col1ier CoIIDty 7oarJ8a Week' be adopted. " ' .. . ~ n'¡ ; I8OC 114 ,.,..r.14 7 Page.. , " .": . ': It- n& ~:anOil anEW OJ' DEV&LOPMD'!' PRO3EC'1"S PRIOR 'lO GROWrB MAØAGE- :a;..~= ~=:x~ ~~~ oa: ~~:OZLOro"':iz r;~CTS TO MAY 17, 1988 Act~ Co88unity Development Adainistrator Olliff .tated that policy direction is being requesteeS, a. to bow Statf will review pro- ject. regarding tratfic iapact on the roadway. of Collier County. He advi8e4 that Wil80n, Miller" Barton, SoIl a Peek. Inc. and the Collier Corporation have been working with Statf in developing the policy opti0D8 . MPO Director Perry indicated that the need tor good POlicy direc- t1OD for the Start co... a. a reeult ot the pending Growth Manage.ent Leg1.lation" adding that there 1. an iapleaentation "chan1n: reqaireð by State Law, that if the Level. ot Service Standards cannot be ..1nta1Ded on the highways" the issuance ot Developa.nt Orders aust ce- 1D that particular area that i. attected by that roadway. Øe .tated that it has long been the opinion ot Staff that the regulatory review begine at the rezoning stage" adding that at the ti- ot the tirst review, an iapact can be est1..ted through a trattic analysi. Which can be exaained tor it. attects on the exi.ting roadway system. 8e DOted that recently, several roadway. have taIleD below the accep- table Level of Service" adding that Growth Manageaent rul88 will require that those roadways be brough~ up to the 8inJaua acce~table . St~ard that the Board ot County Coaaiss10ners adopts in its Growth II8DaøeMn t Plan. Øe advised that a probl.. arises when a develop.ent -- 114 "~t 149 Page 5 .'. ,,_. R(ml5O MAY 11.1988 C0888 1D tor approval of an increa.. in land u.e adjacent to or near a facJIJty that i. at or below the acceptable level. He stated that Itatt 8boald be in a position to aate recoa.endat10n. that would miti- gat. the farther iapact on an already 1apacted taci11ty. Mr. Perry stated that the basis for the Policy 11: 1. Identity Whether a POlicy is large enough to worry about, i.e.. if a project's impact on a roadway segment .xceed. S, of £evel ot Service 'c' annual average daily capacity. 2. It the roadway i. at an unacceptable level, prior to its being improved.. tound in the Capital Improve..nt Element, the developer would have to mitigate that impact, i.e. pbaeing ot the project, delaying certain portions of it until the roadway is improved, paying impact fees up-tront, d?nation ot additional right-of-way that would help expedite the pro- ject, or other type. of mitigation that a developer would have at hi. disposal to otter the County to Jet hi. go ahead with the project in a ti..ly aanner that would be coincident with the ðevelopllent ot the roadway. h¡Ntn In 8D8Wer to CO88Js.ioner P1.tor'. inquiring regardiDg up-tront 1l1paCt t.... Mr. Perry stated that a Mchani.. would be .stabl1shed WhJch would identify tho.. unit. or project. that have paid their J8p8Ct f... up-tront. Hr. Perry .tated that the CCPC baa had petitione within the past taw ...'~ that they torwarded to the Board ot County Coaaiss10ners tor d18pO8al" .ince they involved policy d.cisiona to be 4et.rain.d by the Board whether a developer would be required to ait1gate his iapact. Coaai..ioner B..s. questioned whether a building perait could be deoJed it the property was zoned properly? . .. . , ~,;, , . > '. . Page & , MAY 17,1988 CoaDty Attorney Cuyler stated that the basis of Gr~h Management LegJ.1atJoa i. When the Lev.l of Service drops below the established Level ot Service, building peraits will be denied. Be advi"d that reco lD4ation of Staff and the advisory C088ittees is to have a period ot tJ- in which the infrastructure will be funded and to con- tiD1l8 4eYelop...nt approvals during that period of t.1me. He indicated tbat the qDe8tion i. whether an incre... in already existing deticien- c1.. wJl1 be allowed, without requiring -088 type ot .itigation, or the flip .ide Ja to let the Building Peralta regulate thi.. Mr. Perry, in answer to Co..is.loner Saunder., indicated that M. 1'8q4M.t today i. tor directiOD on how Statt 8hould proceed wi th the &mtlcPaLnt ot a Policy, referring to the draft policy which deals with Staff recØ88endations as to the re\.i.w ot rezone application.. Mr. Alan Reynolc1e ot Hi180n, Miller" Barton, SoIl. Peek" Inc. 8dvi884 that he baa been working with Staft to arrive at a policy Wb1cb 8ddree... rezone rev.1ews. He noted that it has been sugge.ted that 8D inter1. policy be adopted to addres. how the project. w.111 be 1'89181Md between now and when the new plan beco... ettect1ve. Be .tated that the new Gr~h Manageaent Plan will have to identify and 8ddree. today'. i8sue.. Mr. Iteynolc1e stated that concurrency i8 so..thing that has to be U88d Jø applying a POlicy to all type. of Devel°Paent Order., , 1ncladiDg rezoning., adding that to hold one type of DeveloPment Order to a .tandard that i8 different than all other c1evelopaent - 114 w.t 151 Page 7 " * ß4.152 or4era, J. DOt a ta1r way to do it. MAY 17,1988 Mr. Reynold. que.tioned it a pro- ject: 1. detera1Ded to be C8U8ing an 1apact and 8itigat1OD 1. required, 8Dd !8P8ct: tee. are required, what kind of credit will be 1seued 8gafD8t thoee 8i tigations? Øe indicated that a Methodology au.t be detera1Ded Hbere credits can be a.s...ed against 8itigation that will belp t:be County in accelerating a trattic iaproveaent. He questioned Jf .1~1øatiOD is required, what i. the vested right ot that project that baa paid tor Jt. aitigation? Øe stated if Japact tee. are paid ap-front, the County incur. 8088 obligation to ".ure that the tacility j.~. 8Ir. 8trJDo148 indicated that the dratt POlicy i. a good .tart, but it fail. to addre.. all DeveloP88Dt Order. a. detJned in Rule 93S. He DO~ed that at the very least, the policy proposed today i. lacking an ackDowl8CSg8ent that concurrency does not ..an i-dJacy ot delivery of 1afraetructure, adding that if a filtering process is considered, there Dee4a to be a second step in the polJcy that WOUld: 1. Measure actual i8pact., rather than a preauaption against a .tatewide .tandard. 2. Make an ..ses.aent of the iapact on a particular roadway. Bave 80" degree ot tlexJbi11ty that would allow a time period to exi8t, when it Js recøgnized that the roadways will exceed Level. ot Service. 3. ~.siODer Pi8tor 8tated that he tends to agree with Mr. IteyDolcts" adding that he teel. 8Ore explanation i. needed a. to how 88Cb it.. will work with re8pect to Conditions today as well a. tuture . Page 8 MAY 17, 1sa88 Mr. 8ill Barton ot Hil80n, Miller, Barton, SoIl. Peek, Inc., .tated that Mr. Reynolds disC1U8sed 8Ost ot his i.sue. of concern, but Doted that the -.bort-run interi. po11cy will be the heart ot what will occur 10 the long-run-. Øe noted that he doe. not believe the CODC1lrrøx:y is81:l8 tollows the intent ot DCA's position. ø. added that if ODty rezone pet1t10D8 are being reviewed, his feeling i. that the Coanty w111 fail .iserably in the attempt to control the road i.pacts 1D Collier County. Øe indicated that in his opinion" the ollllber ot 4Nel1Jag units that are currently rezoned on the boob, hu nothing to do with growth" adding that growth i. going to occur whether there are a,ooo 11111 t. rezoned, or 25,000 11111 ts. He noted that be te.ls the aim at tbe real source ot the probl88 should be at the Building Pera1t l...l, 8ddiDg that that 1s where the real growth OCC1lr8. Mr. Bartoo ind1cated that he te.ls the direction of the Board to Staff .hould be to the extent ot Mr. Pelhaa'. letter" 10 tol1owing the tr~. of CODcurrency as outlined in his letter, and it a POlicy is to be 8dopted" it should include a aethod in deteraininç the Level. ot Se".ice" DOting that until the Co-ission adopt. a ..thod" the burden will be 00 Statt and the developer. Co88i.sioner Gla.. stated that it appear. that Statf should be , looking at the 93S,Rule, and the building per.it review process . Acting Coaaunity Developaent Ac1ainistrator Ollitt indicated that 1D COD81c1er1ng an interi. Transportation Policy to be U88d be~een now - 114 rr.r.l5:J Page sa iii8 114-lM ~ MAY 17,1988 - tile J8pI_tatJon of the new Co8preb....Jve PI." a year fro. nOOf, be f..l. there are thr.. optJ0D8: 3. 1. To be very restrictive, looking at all devel°P8ent. troa the rezone POSition and u.ing Staff's Transportation Review Policy" would allow Statf to recoaaend approval tor projects on road" which are at or below the reco-nded LOS. There are a .erie. of aitigations that would tate place. 2. Allow Building Peralta to be the regulator. It the roads were not at an adopted LOS, the iseuance ot Building Per.its WOUld be ceased. The a1ddle ot the road option, i. a ~ tJeredlevel -- The transportation r~Jew Will not be re80ved troa the Planning stage. Statf will continue to advi.e that the project will have a negative impact on an already poor road, but the Board aaat establJsh a LOS. This option would allow the rezone. to be heard, and the developer would take hi. own ri.k" so that if the develop8ent ot service drops below, i... ~F." the per- .it WOUld stop at that point. ID ""'.8r to Coaai.sioner Goodnight" Mr. 011itt advi.ed that the Board can..t a ditter.nt LOS tor thQ ditterent roadway.. ~..i0D8r Pi.tor stated that there are certain roac18 that the ~tr J8 behind 0", ...d 8ccordJng to the .... GrOWth 118nege...t Pl.... tile 1- of baUd1ng pe""1~. "111 -~ be all_. adding ~ha~ he f..l. Statf and the Board should be ..de aware of this in advance. Co8aJs.ioner Saunders .tated that is. teel. the inter!. policy .boald track what the peraanent POlicy will be. Ca t"1oaer'Sa1mder. lIOVect, Hc0Dde4 by CoaaJ.s.io:ner Goodnight -""'184 -~ly. tha~ .~att.. NC-..s Policy be a&>p~e4. wJtIa tile 8ZC8ptJOD that Jt ~t8Cta tha Ja_a of all D8nl_t 01"'-1'8, .. detine4 by the WloricSa A4aJnJ.trati". Code" Chapter s.3ð. . j :,' ; c :; <:' Page 10 .:; -,' .,'/ - ,,~ ~i' ¡;.\ .. J " .~4 '~ MAY 17', ì 1988 , ~8p8 n 1t:8 nu ~ IttD ftZ STAft OW n.oaIDA lOR A Sl'tlu~ 'to Dkv&LOP COIJUDOR 1I..M1.,........ ~ - &PÞAUY&D Acting CD~kuity neveJopaent Adainistrator OlJift stated that eubject contract with the Stat. of Florida i. tor a study to develop a CorrJdozo ~..nt Plan, noting that the City ot Waple. and the Cotmty bave jOiDtly put together a t... which i. workiøg Oft recOlUlen- datJona of the a/ODAT Study. B. indicated that application baa been 88de for. grant in the aaount of 850,,000 tro. the State" which ha. ben Nee 1 ft4 . He DOted that this 1 tea will co.. before the .aples City Coaøc il on Sfec1nesday. May 18, 198 8 . Q= fN1ODer Pi8t:or 1IOYe4" 88CODde4 by Co8ai..Jcmer Goodø.Jght and C8Z'rJ8d -f80Q817, to accept the Staff rec;o. 8D4atJoo of aPr1"OV.tng tIae D8~t llit of ~n ., 1 ty At f aJra Contract:. " , . ,. ,'. " I . " . , . . ~- .., " co ... " , , . ...n4~155 " ; ".ì .) ~ Page 11 . : : !' . I. i . . ~ ,~: :: MAY 11,1188 I t:8 ftU Par.Da:Juar D&v&LOPh&.r .AG.~~n Bantu. IfESTUGBOOU COthIJU'I'IU 01' DPr.a &lID DEPUlft&IIT ow COIIJO.l1T AnAIR- CltUmwr 'fO ft)RkARD U!nut ro DC& Actiog Co88unity Developaent Adainistrator Olliff indicated that SUbject request is from Attorney George Varnadoe" repr88enting Pelican Bay POD" for a change to their Developaent Order. Øe indicated that ~J. J. ~~ b~bt ~for. tM ~.rd to ~J.. of tM ~~t. noting that t:be State is requesting local CO88ent on the change to the DeYalcp-nt Order. Be stated that Staff has adainistrat1vely noted that they have no negative CO888nt to thi. change. Øe further .tated that Staft will bring all future Developaent Order change. to the 8o8rd for kDow18dge" inforaation and direction purpo.... Øe ..ked that a letter be approved with the Chairaan's signature" .tating that the CoaDty has no objection to the Pelican Bay Develop..nt Order change . Cc t..JODer 8a1mden 8OVe4" HC0Dde4 by eo-.t..1oaer Pi.tor and C8rrJed aftaftt80a81y" that the letter .tating DO objection to the PelJC8D Bay Ðn81opÀ..nt Order chaDgw be toZ'WardecS to the State. % t:8 ftU 8Uø 10 I'IIOCbD JrnII IIOIDW. P&ouu n:tJIa PROcus IIBIWIDDIIJ sar.r. IIUnmr . . P D'INIC PbR.I:'I' Actiog ~O88Unity Development Ac1aidistrator 011itt stated that I Shell "'tern ts applying for additional per.its that are out.tde of the Preserve Area, and they are requesting that Statt expedite the aoGI 114 M 165 Page 12 1 ,..-- :f t - C8r1'!8d -1-1)", tha~ .~t be I"'~"""~ed ~o -- with ~h8 t; 881 PD'81 t:t:JAg , , ::.:1..... .-.torr :-:SInOll OF PItOPbu 1IZQIInw. ftIa DB ...~ Ds.l.lN&.r rea 'l'II8 C-4 CUAr, 00'17&Lt" PRO.7KCl' AT PRICE STRUT - AI' þ..", &II 1 ~.\ I .. 114-166 MAY 17" 1988 perait, .iace they have their cr8W8 here, and it would cause an econo- 8ic bardahip it the cr~ had to be sent back to their original .tart1ng destination. ~I:I t-JODeI' Øoodø1ght 1IOY84, 8eCODde4 by Co8a.i..1O1UtZ' S8aDder. Public HOrks Adainistrator Archibald advised that subject request deal. with the l..t par'.l ot property for the C-4 Canal project. He .tated that this project was started a nuaber ot year. ago" to develop an oatfaJl canal troa US-41 through Eagle Creek and down to the 8eD4er8OD Creek Outtall. Øe stated that currently there i. an agr.a..at wherein the County will acquire the right-ot-way and the Lely ÐeveIGp80nt Corporation will undertake the construction ot the canal 8Dd 8088 cros. drains under Price Street. Be noted that the price Nbich was agreed Upon between Stott and the Developer 1. 82.50/eq. tt. tor the property. Be advi.ed that Staft ia reco...nding that the Board purchase this tinal parcel which will allow for the COft8truction ot the canal. In answer to Co"1ssioner Basse, Mr. Archibald advised that this canal will allow tor the discharge fro. the canal on the north side of GS-41, DOting that water backs up and attects the Waples Manor " . , . . - Page 13 MAY 17, 1t88 area" 8Dd "111 attect the Lely DeveloPIMnt in the tuture. ~ f-1oDer P1.tor 80"84, 88CODde4 by CoaaJ..i0D8r GoodDJght and ""'184 --'-ly. ~o 8C_~ Statt --u- - 81ItJaor1z. the ~ to -..te the Parchae Agre.....t. 8QtborJze Statt to to 11 ow tJJe ~ cloeJug ~ - record a11 DeC888ary doc-..ta ..1th U. C1erJt o~ Coarta. I; ,; I lOll 1t4 ,acr.167 Page 14 MAY 11,1988 r 8OAD DIPItOYUIIWI.15 1'0 SABAL PALM ROAD AJQ) RESftICTIOD AS COIIDrroD .. 1fARR.Ift - 80 tUA-.r>1IAA ~PORTIW UJlTIL TIlE ROAD IS IMPROV'ED 1'0 COtJRTY m CUDS PUblic WOrt. Adainistrator Archibald indicated that a quarry operation baa opened up on Sabel Pal. Road, which has resulted in the ru14eDts objecting to truck tratfic and the aanner in which the tracks are c1r 1 Yen . Be stated that the paved lanes for the existing , roed8 are 9'-10' in width, noting that current standard for a collec- tor road place. tbo8e widths at 12'. Be added that currently this 1. .trictlya:oca1 road but, in the tuture" he can perceive this.. . rural collector road. Øe turther advised that the re.ident. would lite to probJb1t truck trattic DO this road, noting that the operation of the quarry can create a hazard on this road. He stated that the quarry operator would like to continue his quarry operatioo and aake 18prov...nts to the roadway, and otters the following sugge.tions: 1. Reconstructing Sabal Pal. Road to a collector road standard, widening the road to 24': and proposed bike paths for the children: 2. A reduction in the starting hours, so that the trucks 11111 DOt be on that road betore 7:00 A.M. 3. Controlling the nuaber of trucke using the quarry, to ten or 15 truck8. COordinatIng with the SherIft'. Departaent to entorce the 8peec1law., and the quarry operator will have one ot his eaployees aonitor truck tratfic, so if a driver is driving recklessly or exceeding the speed li.its, those drivc~s will be prohibited fro. using the quarry. Mr. Archibald advised that no ..tter what the controls are of the 4. developer" the County still h.. the tinal control, i.e. the wei~ht ot I0OI( 114 hi'.( 171 Page 1& -"--' . :~ - ll(Ml72 MAY 1'7, 1988 the trucks or truck use of that road. Coanty Manager Dorrill mentioned that the original Excavation Pera1t. .0.59204, approved in 1985, was issued to Delbert Sanders aø4 it appeared to be a relatively _11 perait at that' ti.., noting I that Mr. Sanders 1s no longer i'.volved with the pit activity and queatioaec1 Mbetber aaterial could be aoved off-site, and secondly, whether the per.it can be assigned to. new corporation? Mr. Archibald noted that the property did change hands and the perai~ to excavate conditions reaain the s.... Se stated that the original perait, with stipulations, indicate that the aaterial was tor two parpo...: 1) The i...diate Sabal Pal. Area, and 2) To ..ell as ~'rcial fill. Se advised that even though there is a perait to re80V8 till fro. that are., the County still has the right of control 00 Iaha1 Pa18 Road regarding truck traf f ic. Mr. Gary Hilson, attorney for the fill pit operator, stated that hi. client is caught in the .iddle, notIng that he purchased the pro- pert7 In reliance upon per.its that were already in place tor several year.. be bas spent thousands of dollars to bring the pit up to operating standards, he has spent thouaands of dollars to i.prove Sabel Pal. Road, he has entered into contracts with various developers to supply fill and crushed rock and he 1s under an obligation by these cootracts to follow through. Attorney Wilson advised that at the time his client purchased the property, the aaps provided by the Naples aea1tor. inc1~cated that Sabal Pal. Road Mae a collector road. Page 1& MAY 17, 1988 &t~oraey WI1eon indicated that hi. client doe. want to be a good D8I~~borhooc1 and 1s concerned with the eatety of the residents. He advised that a aeeting wae heldla.t night at hie office with Mr. ArchIbald, noting that the property owners had been notified, in hopes that theIr difference. could be worked out, but none were in at ten- dance. The reeults of the aeeting, as Mr. Archibald noted earlier, are to l1ait th, hours of operation at the pit, aonitor the trucks usIng the road, widen the road and provide crushed rock for the one aile ot residential area, work with the Sheriff'. Departaent to have a depaty 00 duty when a rea80nable aaount of trucks are using the fill pit~ Itea H Mr. WI1aon advised that a letter tro. the Sabal Pal. Association, dJrected to the County Manager, states that they would like to see iaprOY6..nts aade to the road. Mr. &1 30hnaon, pit operator stated that he purcha8ec1 the till pit ODe year ago, adding that at that ti.., he realIzed there would have to be a substantial 88O1U1t ot IIOney spent on Sabel Pal. Road trolD the paveaent to the pit, to have access to the pit, which was done. øe .tated that he aet with South Florida Water Management, noting that they ha4 concerns regarding the road, and the County did a study on the road to see if it was feasible to improve the road further. South FlorIda Hater Manage..nt agreed that for the present ti88, the road 8boGld reaain to Sanders Blvd., and it can be i.proved to County ,.. . :; IT~, ,113 Page 17 ..1l4P1Gt174 MAY 17,1988 stan4ard8 . Øe indicated that a drainage plan has recently been coapleted that will finish the iaprove..nts that are going to be made to the road regarding Sanders Blvd. Øe stated that he is willing to . contribate a portion of the cost to ,iaprove Sabal Pal. Road. Mr. Hilli.. MeAnly, engineer representing SeaCon Industries, .tated that there are three issues that need to be deterained: 1. Whether subject road is a collector road. Ifhether it is a safe, well designed road to function a8 a collector road; the &n8Wer is that it is not, at this time but with proper design, it can be. 2. 3. During the ti.. period that this road is being constructed, can it be a safe oper~tion tor trattic on that road? Mr. MeAnly stated that fro. an engineering standpoint, h. teels that all the desires of the people who live in the Sabal Pal. area can be..t aDd, at the s... ti.., the rights of the people who live past t:be Sabel Pal. area can be taken into consideration. The following property owners spoke in opposition of through truck tratf1c on Sabal Pal. Road, with their objections listed below: craig Bassett 3oan .aftal Carla Staron Pat Meets An 18t wide road which is dangerous for the children aak1ng their way to the school bus stop, and standing along the road waiting tor the bus; the road 1s too narrow tor the trucks; excessive noise (with a tape being played to deaonstrate the sound created by a truck using the road) and excessive speeds by the trucks; blasting; use of a Page 18 MAY 17, 1988 rural" residential coaaunity for co...rcial use; photos eubaitted dep1ctiog the narrowness of the road, with a child waiting for the school ba8: spooking of horses; devaluation of property values. The tollcwing persona spoke in favor of the petition: Mr. George Gratz (Telegra.) Mr. Joe Townsend (in favor of i.proving the road, trucks being aonitorec1) Mr. John Vaughn (concurred with Mr. Townsend). Mr. Mark I rgang with hp8ft CC Tt..loaer Sa1mdera. 80Y0d." aecon4ed by Co8aJsslcmer Goodnight IIDII C8ft'1e4 GnNIS~ly, that finding ot tact baaed 00 t.stiacmy by the petitløaer 8D4 r..ldenta Indicate that a 4angeroua 8it:uat1on ex18ts on 8ah81 Palla Road due to the pit aDd excavation act1v1t1e. aDd there- fore" t:bø8e actlvltl.. be 81:18p8Dde4 until adequaate road 18prove..nt. are 88de to Sabal Pal. Road, according to County st8l1~.rc18" either by t:be COaDty or other 8OU1"C"" and at that ti_. it will be deteraineð. wbet:ber t:be operation 8bould cont1mae. In answer to Mr. Archibald, Co..l.sioner Saunders stateð that the operation at the pit..y continue, but with no truck traffIc. ... a.c...: 11:25 A.M. - 11:35 A.M. at which tl- Deputy Clerk Boff88D ... replaced by Deputy Clerk Kenyon. ... 1 t- ft83 8m H8-12.. rea A 24 SOUR OJIAhbum FUEL POMP I1'A'.rlO11 IJI DOIODLU - ANlRDID 70 3." POMP SERVICE. I-C. I- THE AMOOWT or 882.000 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 28, lie8, a. evidenced by AttJdavlt ot Publication tiled with t. 114",(175 Page 19 ..U4P1Ctl76 MAY 17, 1988 t~ Clerk, bi48 were received tor a 24 hour unattended fuel pump sta- tioo 1D I880kal88 until 2:30 P.M., April 13, 1988. Public Morks Adainistrator Archibald stated that this item deals with ~ replaceaent of the fuel puap tacility at the Iaaokalee Barn oft Stockade Road. Be noted that a. a part of a contiquing program to . upgrade and aeet State requirements for fueling 8tations, Statf has d..igne4 a new fuel pump facility at the Iaaokalee 8ite, adding that this design i. part of Bid .88-1244 which was advertised. Øe noted that three bi48 were submitted and they were all coapetitive, adding that the low bidder w.. :1 Ir M Puap Service. Øe noted that Statt is reco~..n4ing that the contract be awarded to:1 6 M Pump to install the pa8p tac11ity and the tanka at the Iaaokalee site in accordance with the bid and a budget aaend8ent also be considered to transfer Motor Pool ae.erv.. into the Motor Pool operating account. Be stated that tbe low bid was tor 882,500 which also includes a 8Onitoring .yste. aDd a cO8pvter controlled dispensing aystea. Cc. t_icmer Pi.tor 8OVec1, aec0D4e4 by CoaaJ..icmer Goodnight and carried ~180Q8ly, that Bid .88-1244 tor a 24 hour unattended fuel paIIp .t:at1oo 1D Ia8okal- be awarc1e4 to .1 1& M PuIIp Service, Inc. in tb8 .~t ot 882,500. It- -.01 COU.~z-tfID8 8UCØ PARXX.O PROGRAM - COJl1'IJn1ED TO MAY 31. lt88 Public Services AdainJstrator O'Donnell stated that this is a reco~.an4ation for iapleaentation of a revised County-wide beach Page 20 . MAY 11" 1988 park 1Dg progr- . He stated that the Board of County Coaaissioners entered into an interlocal agreement with the City of Kaples on 8ove8ber 24,1981, pertaining to beach parking. He noted that there are three issues to be resolved: one is to proceed with the process of a ba4get ...nd8ent to aake payaents to the City of Kaples for approxl- aateIy 810,000 during the course of Piscal Year 1988 and also to appropriate 8Ofti.. pursuant to.n agreeaent that the County entered int~ with ADO tor the operation ot Claa Pass Park which is approxima- tely 831,000: second issue is to honor the City peralta at the County attended lots: and the third issue is to raise the charge tor parking troa 8.50 a day for a vehicle to $2.00 a day tor a vehicle at Claa ...., Tigertail, and Vanderbilt beaches. He stated that the County Attorney has rendered an opinion that apecitie. that the County can have a ditterential charge between a resident and a non-resident but pDJ"81J8ftt to a previous agreeaent that the County has with Oft when TigertaiI was c1ev110ped, it prevents the County fro. having a discri-. aJnatory charge tor resident versus non-resident at that beach taci- l1ty. Be stated that approxiaately 9°' of the users at Tigertail are DOD-coanty vehicles. He stated that he would like to have a unitorm policy tor all the attended lots, adding that it the City peralta are bonorec1 at attended lots, they MOuld not be charged. Be indiclI.ted that in light of the previous agreement with DNR regarding Tigertail, there need8 to be a uniform policy. County Attorney Cuyler stated that the threshold question and one IO~ 114"1',£177 Page 21 ..114""178 MAY 17" 1988 th4t bas received a lot of discussion is whether it is legally poseible at all to differentiate in any of the parking areas or access are.. be~en out-of-County residents and in County residents, adding that the County cannot charge tor access to the beach. I Be noted that I parking i. a service that i. provided by the County, adding that the ar~t ie that if there i. no parking, the beach cannot be accessed, but in fact, these are two separate issues. Øe noted that the answer to thi. question is that the County can differentiate between an in- County r..ident and an out-of-County resident but there h.. to be a rat1oaa18 basis based on econo.ic factors. He noted that the tactor ba&leal1y ie that in-County re.idente pay through their taxes for the capital expenditure., 88intenance and various other ite.. that are associated with this, noting that out-of-County residents do not pay for thi. 8Dd the arguaent presently exist~ that the County ~s discri- ainat1og against in-County residents and forcing the. to pay tor all the tnn4tng ot the parking areas and people out of the County are peylog nothing tor this. He noted th~t a proble. arises if a contract bas been entered into for State fund. and the County has agreed that there will be no differentiating between in-County and out-of-County residente, then under the contract, the County is prohibited from di.cri.inating. Øe stated that at T1gerta11, the County has ~ntered into ODe of these agree..nts, adding that funding has been received and through that State funding, there 1s an argument that the QUt-of- Coanty residents have paid their share because they pay state taxes. Page 22 MAY 1" 1988 Be stated that be would suggest that the Board of County Co_issioners direct Staff to contact the State to see it there is a way to a.end ~t contract, regardless of what is decided on this date. Øe noted ~t this contract was for a $100,000 grant in 1979 and there could be rea~le arguaent aade that this aoney has long since been used by out-of-county residents as their share and the County should now be able to establish their own fee structure. He noted that the i.por- tant tbJDg is if the County is going to differentiate, then the fin.~- cial t~ors involved have to be evaluated and there he. to be a basis apoD Wbich to differentiate. CO8aissioner Hasse questioned what the 8100,000 grant was used for, to Wbich County Attorney CUyler stated that under the contract it..lf it describes beach facilitie. and parking is included within beach taciliti.., theretore, it is clear that the County can d18crimi- Date.. to parking fees. Public Services Ac1aini.trator O'Donnell stated that the aoney was aeed tor the developaent of the facilities at Tigertail: the restroo. tac11ities, the crossovers, the picnic tables. etc. Mr. David Ward, Vice President of Citizens Association ot Bonita Beach, stated that he i. speaking for the tourists that provide the 11vel1booc1 of this County. He noted that as far a. the tourists are coaoeroec1, the City of Ksples has ..de a big mistake and that the COan~ is tollowJng their exaaple. Mrs. Marjorie Nard, President ot Citizen. Association ot Bonita ~ 114,....tl79 Page 23 MAY 17, 1988 Beach, stated that the association has over 1,450 ...hers in Collier Coan~ 8Dd Lee County working for the preservation and protection of the Florida s.ashore and the public access freely thereto. She .tated ~t the aeabers of the association pick up trash 365 days a I y.ar on the beaches and it they have to pay to park, they will not be volanteeriog their services to clean up the beaches, ac1c1ing that IDC'CJt of the people that do the clean up are fro. Lee County. She stated that this is discri.ination be~ Floridians and neighbors, adding that tbe tourists are providing the livelihood for a lot of people 1D bplea. Sba stated that she hopes that no one takes the County to task on the aatter ot di8criaination even though the County Attorney 88Y Inc11ca~e that it i. legal to do this, there aay be other opinions ~t ditfer. She stated that she is requesting that the Board of coanty CO88issioners place a 8Oratoriua for five years on the beaches in the northern end of the County so that there is no charge for parkJDg. Coanty Attorney CUyler stated that this 1s not an access charge that is being discus.ed, it i. a parking fee. Co8aissioner Saunders questioned how auch aoney would be raised to e.tablish a parking f.e versus the cost of running the program, to which Mr. O'Donnell stated that this is difficult to estiaate, adding that the tees do not usually cover the cost of the program. He noted that the purpose of this fee is to aake it easier for Collier County residents to get a parking spot at the beaches. He noted that the Page 24 MAY 17" 1988 .ehlcl.. that have stickers on the. would .till be allowed to park free. Øe noted that Tigertail Beach would probably generate the most r...oues.. that ..... to be the beach area that has the .ost vehicles with out-of-county plates. Co8ai..i0D8r Saunders stated that he was opPOsed to beach access t... ~ this aatter originally caae up, adding that he is not happy wi~ the plan that the City of .aples has. Be stated that if the CoaD~ 1. going to charge, it should continue with a 8Ode.t charge of 50e a day, but it doe. not aake that .uch .ense to go to a complicated syst.. where there are stickers and increased fees when the County will DOt be benefiting tro. it or aaking that auch aoney fro. it. Co Sssloner Pistor stated that there aay not be that auch DOney gesHlrate4 froa this proqraa, but the County ls still going to have to pay the City of Kaples 810,000 for the residents ot the County to be able to park at the City beach.. tor nothing, yet the City residents can presently park at the County beaches tor nothing. He indicated that this does not see. fair. He noted that the County has enough expeD888 trying to aaintain all the beaches and paying 83.2 8illion for Barefoot Beach without any help, as well as the continued expenses that are incurred at Cl.. Pass Park and the continuing proble- at Tigertail Beach. Be noted that so..one should also check with the State with regards to aaending the co~tract tor the 8100,000 grant. If8p8 .. ~i.sloner Saunders stated that the County, through the 810,000 lOOK 114 py.( 181 Page 25 1 '~'.. 111 PI« 182 MAY 17, 1988 pay.ent to the City of .aples, will be paying this on behalt of the citizeoa ot the County to be able to park in the City and under the proposal that is before the Board at the pre.ent ti.., the City resi- dents will be parking in the COUhty for free. He stated that he does not f..l that just because the City has a charge is justitication tor u. CoaDty to do the -- thing. COQDty Attorney CUyler stated that for the Board to ditferentiate, it D88ð8 to be on an evaluation of all the economic factors that are 1øvolvec1, adding that there neec18 to be soaething that Indicates capi- tal expenditures tor the var ioue beaches or 8088 kind ot ba818 tor the econoaic reason to differentiate. Collllt..icmer Gl... stated that the Board does not have any tinan- cial expenditure. to base their opinions on, ac1c11ng that he feels that ~s ..tter should be continued another two weeke or until Start has tl.. to prepare this 1ntoraatlon to aake the judgment that is required. Be stated that he feel. that the tee that is being charged, however" 1s too low and it anything 1s done, he would sugge.t doubling the t.. to aake the parking are.. pay for the..elves. c~ '_1oaer P18tor 1IOV84. HCODdeð by eo-1..1oner -.. and e&n'Jed 1ID8DJ80a81y" that tbe CoaDty-wlde beach parkJDg progr- be CODt1aa8d to May 31" 1988. c..=. '..ioaar Gl..s directed Statf to get in touch with the State of Wlor14a to 4iacus. the contract and the possibility ot aaending the CODtract: with regarða to Tlgertail Beach. . Page 26 MAY 17" 1988 It.. ~ rtAn '!O ~~ wrrB EVALOATIO- OF THE WILt.OM RO1f QUARRY WOR A 1tEG10II&r.. PARE FJ.CILITY AJrt) TO PftZ1JARE A nJrAJlCIAL AJlALYSIS Public Services Ac1ainistrator O'Donnell stated that this item 1s to review the potential acquisition of the Willow Run Quarry to be used .. a regicmal park. He stated that on February 9, 1988, the Board directed Staff to evaluate a proposal by Highway Pavers tor the acquisition ot the Willow Run Quarry which is located on C.R. 951 near the Florida Sports Parle. He reported that the current Growth Manage- aent Plan that the Board is considering specifies a standard for regJcmal parks in Collier County of 2.9912 acres per 1,000 people, ad4~ that pursuant to this standard by 1992, the 8iniaua acreage that the County should have would be 489 acres and by 1994, the County should have 543 acres. He stated that the current proposed site is 490 Nbich would solve the deficiency by 1992, but there would still be . 4eticiency of approxi..tely 53 acres in 1994. He indicated that the are. ia coaprised of about 60 acres of wetlands and could be developed with. lake situation to accoaaodate fishing, boating, canoeing, DAture trails, picnicking, caaping, bike trails, play are.., and the like. Ø8 reterred to a possibl9 plan that could be applied tor the park site, adding that Highway Pavers are authorized to excavate about 10,000 cubic yards which would aake the two lalee areas. He n~ted that Staff..t with Highway Pavers and looleed at possible are.. tor the l~ to be located in order to give the County an area that would '001( 114 ,.",t 183 Page 27 , - ll(nct184 MAY 17, 1988 aax1.1ze the developable land tor various recreational facilitie. as well.. allowing Highway Pavers to excavate the 10,000 cubic yards tbat baa already been approved. He noted that pursuant to this, the County woald generate about 84 to 85 .illion that Highway Pavers woald be paying the County because the County would own the property, but BigbNay Pavers would continue with the excavation. Be stated that the .ite appears to be worthwhile tro. a location point of view and from a total acreage point of view, but before Staff can reco...nc1 this to ~be Board. several thing. need to be addressed; a financial analysis aa.t be completed, a land survey needs to be done, a coapetit!ve bid to select a consultant to develop a ...ter plan for the regional park .ite" water analysis aust be coapleted, a ti88 certain 8U8t be deve- loped.. to When the property would becoae available ~o the public, a c0881taent froa the .eller to ensure that excavation would continue tor the potential revenue, a contract negotiating te.. is recommended to be ..tabllshec1 to negotiate with Highway Pavers, a specitic agreeaent would have to be prepared with regards to acquiring the pro- perty, the excavation, and the financing, and a design te.. would also bave to be established for the design of the park aaenitles. Co8alssioner Basse stated that it appears that this aay be a good site, but questioned if all this intor.ation would be brought back to the Board, to which Mr. O'Donnell replied atflraatively. Mr. George Eeller indicated that there i. a park site in East -.p188 that is not coapleted at this tlae, there are aany school sltes Page 28 , MAY 17, 1188 that are not being utilized to their full extent and these are things that sbould be looked at prior to purchasing any acre land for parks. Øe acted that the County should not be getting into the aining busi- nes', nor sbould the County be paying 86.~ .illion for land that can- DOt be used for qui te eo.. t i.e. He noted that the interest that will be paid on thi. DOney will be over 86.5 .illion by the ti.. it is paid tor an4 the revenues that are coaing back in are not soaething that can be 4epeD4e4 upon. He stated that he feels that the County should be able to buy land that they want to, where they want to and probably get it at a better price. He noted that this whole aatter is prema- tare at this t i.. . Mr. O'Donnell stated that the owner has indicated that the parc~.. price is negotiable and there are a lot of details to be resolved, adding that Staff is si.ply asking for authorization to proceed to c1ateraine it this land would be worthwhile for a regional park. Mr. Keller indicated that the interest that will be paid out i8 a eare thing, but the royalties tro. selling the fill is not a sure thiDg - that i. baaed on the econollY. 8O1IDd Jove.t_nt. Be Doted that this is not a Co8aissioner Goodnight stated that with regards to the school pro- I perty, there is no~ enough of that to begin with and all school pro- perty 1. open atter school hours tor the children and it is being used to 1~ ot its fullest possible extent. MOl 114 w-l185 Page 29 - 114WJ.186 MAY 17" 1988 Mr. Richard Braun stated that the County i. being _ked to sub- si4ize private enterprise and the conetruction business tluctuates froa year to year, adding that no one i. going to guarantee the paJ88D~. OD this land and if the aoney is not available it will have to CO88 oat of ad valorem taxes, which he object. to. Be noted that the State i. talking about purchasing the property that is south of Alligator Alley and flooding the area 3 to 4 teet which would aake this property inoperable for a park. ~ssioner Baese stated that he doe. not want to see the County pattiDg up any 8Oney for this property, but .H Staff can work out 8O88th1ng" he would willing to look at it. ~ssioner Goodnight stated that she would like the negotiating te.. to investigate the other 160 acres that .ay be available, adding tbat this land aay be needed at SO8e tiae in the future to .eet any additioaal deficit. Co88!ssioner Saunders stated that an appraisal is needed ~n the property, a financial analy.i., adding that he is not sure if the exper~i.. needed 1s available by County staff. Clerk Giles indicat~d that he did not believe that this type of ezpert1.. is available on Staff and therefore, it would have ~o be COD tracted ou t . County Manager Dorrill stated that the question is whether the Board of County Coaais.loners is interested in a regional park and it they are then it need. to be deter.ined as to what size. He noted . Page 30 MAY 1" 1988 that after 3une 22 the developer will own only 300 of the 500 acres as be canDOt bold his control of the total 500 acres beyond that date. ø. .tated that the County could possibly deal with the other owner after 3UD8 22. Se noted that the financing is basically cash in advance and then royal ties would be paid back to the County on a per ton or per yard ba8is. Be noted that the developer would continue to I aiDe the aaterial and When the County i8 ready to start development, the developer would 8OVe to another area of the site. Be noted that there MOUld baYe to be a guara~tee or a Letter of Credit for the 8ftftll.81 royalty payaent 80 that it construction wa. dOND or the deve- loper went into a bankruptcy situation, the County could protect their iDter..t. . 0-= t-1aDer ~re 8OYe4, 8eCOD&t4 by CoaaJ...1OD81" P1.tor and can'i84 unanfJW'tuly, that the Ccnmty proceed to evaluate the project for a regiOD&1 park Mhile 811Pbaaiz1Dg the need tor a t1ßt1nc1a1 analy- .18 t:J:aat ..,. or aay DOt be c1DDe by Staf f . ..... ee8mS..i0D8r S8uDðer. left the ...ting at 12:15 P.M. ..... I t:e8 .120 '12,,000 'fO sa APPROPRI.I.'RD TO 'I'D LAJf LIBIWn' I'OR JtDIAIJIIJIG œ 'rIIIS rI8C&L ...a. AJID St'AR AJID \NU.;¡-., MAJIAGD TO NORJt 011 ~UKA ro1fDI1IG Attorney 30hn Passido80, representing the Bar Association, stated that be 1. petitioning for tunds to aaintain the level ot services that the I L8w Library has prdvided the coaaunity over the last 2-1/2 years. He .tated that over the last 12 to 18 aontbs through the expansion and ;; lUr".J87 Page 31 '-'" .. -r T ~' .1 ì ,; t' ... 114 rG 188 MAY 1" 1985 enhanc888Dt of the service., it has caused a .ignificant drain on the study source of revenue. available to the Law Library. Be stated that the Law Library is funded principally with court filing fee. which ~e incr.ased. but the size ot the LaN Library has increased three- fold .ince 1985 and the inventory ot books has also increa.ed the _. Be .tated that the increase in the level ot service. has caused a draaatic need for funding increa.es that he. out paced the revenue 8OUrCe8 provicSed by court filing tees. Be noted that several cost econoay ..aaure. "ere i.ple.ented which included eliminating Computer Nest Law Services and i.po.ing a copier user charge, but this is not a 8Uftlcleot aaount. He stated that it is now more apparent that the iDCréa8e in expenditures has greatly out paced the revenue sources. ø. .tated that the LaM Library furnishes resources neces.ary to ensure the proper ac1ainistration of justice; it also provides an essential service to the citizen. ot Collier County in as.uring access to the Court. guaranteed by the Florida Constitution and provided tor in a ..anlDgtul aanner. He noted that he Mould like to work with the Board of County Co..issioners in exploring May. and ..ana to ensure that this ..sential and vital service to the citizens of Collier County is preserved . Øe stat~d that he is requesting that the Board ot County C088issloners appropriate a sua sufficient to the Law Library tund in order to 88intain it. operations tor the balance of the fiscal year, adding that it is e.tiaated that this a.ount Is approziaately $12,0')0. Be noted that he would also like to encourage the continuation of a Page 32 MAY 17, 1988 dialogue with regards to acre long-term solutions as it is quite app.rent that the court tiling fees are not going to be adequ.te to CODtimle to generate the revenue. that will be required for the Law Library to continue its operation. ... 0.0 t..ioaer SaaDc1era re~ to the ...t1ng at 12:20 P.M. ... Co8ais.ioner Basse questioned what other ways would be available to acquire the tunds, to which Hr. Paesidomo stated that it appears to bia that full consideration should be given to aaking the Law Library faDd a aatter of annual appropriations tro. the Board ot County Co88Ja.ionera. Be noted that May. to acquire additional funds would be by a draaatic increase in court filing tees. Be stated that approx18ately 810.00 tro. each circuit court tiling tee is allocated to ~ Law Library fund and he estiaates that this would have to be doubled in order to appropriate sufficient funds. Cc t..icmar Pi.tor lIOVed, aecODdecS by CoaaJeeicmer Goodnight and carried aD8D18OU81y, that 812,000 be appropriated to carry the Law Library to OCtober 1, 1988, aDd Staft an4 the County MaDager work with the L8w Library to c1eteraine a way to tun.c1 the library in the future. It- no1 8m ..8-1217 I'Oa DlDGDCT O"lILI'rY REPAIRS - AIfA.ItDm 1'0 CJ8UA COIø.I~~IOII Legal notice having been published in the Ifaples Daily Jfft.. on , February 3, 1988, ås evidenced by Affidavit ot Publication tiled with the Clerk, bic18 were received tor Bid #88-1217 tor e..rgency utility ... 114 PV,{ 189 Page 33 U4rGlOO MAY 17, 1988 r8þ8ir. until 2:30 P.M., Febru3ry 17, 1988. Utilities Ac1ainistrator Crandall stated that there have been instanc.. where the Utilitie8 Departaent has had e.ergency repairs that they could not handle the...lves and contractors have been con- tacte4 10 ...rgency situations to do work for the Utilities D1Yi.iOD. He stated that he 1s setting up a special tunð for such a purpose and would like to have a contractor on an annual basis for such ...rgeocles. Be noted that proposal. were .ent to 10 contractors and only one contractor ~esponded, which 1s due to the tact that these contractor. are uncertain as to the 8IIOUDt ot work that they will rece1ve as well as the inconvenience of aaking their equipaent available 188ec1iately. Be noted that if their equip.ent 1s busy on other jobs, it aakes it difficult for the., which is why only one r..ponee tfU rece i ved . Se noted that Cabana Construction did respond and they have done work tor the County in the past with no proble.. aDd be would reco...nc1 that this bid be awarded to Cabana Construction tor emergency repairs. "4: i..iemer Pi.tor 1IOVe4, ..cOD4ec1 by Coaa1..icmer Goodnight and carried ftft8ftt80U81y, that Bid '88-1217 tor e..rgency utility repairs be ~ to CaNIW Cooatruction of I't. Myers. It- "02 KIIO~nrG SERVICES TO BE SOLICITED FOR DatGJI OJ' MATER SYSTEM OR 801""&\".1: TO CLAM PASS PARJt .AJID ALOWG SUGAR DRIVE TO PELICAX BAY. STAFF COISULTAJIT SnECTIO. C0tØ4IT'fEZ - APPROVED Utilities Ad.ini.tra~or Crandall stated that this ite. i. for running water to Cla. Pa.. Park as well as running a water line along Page 3. -,." ,--,-" --. ~. MAY 17, 19ØØ Seagate Drive. Øe noted that be is asking tor authorization to soli- c1~ engineering services for this design. ~ t_ioaer Saunders 1IOVed, seconded by Co_1ss1emer Pi.tor and C8rr1ed ~t~ly, that Statt be authorized to solicit profession.l for the de8igD of a water .,..t.. 00 the Boardwalk to Claa Paa8 Park aDd. alcmg Seagate Drive to Pelican Bay 8D4 also that the follOWing staft consultant selection coaaJttee be approved: EeviD O'Donnell, Public Servic.. A4aJni.trator JUch8el -8W88ß, Water ÐepartJlent Director JUcbael ~ld, Assistant Utilities A4aJni.trator lfi1l1aa Laverty, Utilities Operation Coordinator Steve Carnell, Purchasing Director rape n It.. nD3 8m "8-1261 roa %JtAC1'oR WITH 800II ~&K - AWARDED TO ~ ~RD DAe'roR COMPAn m TO AMOOn OJ' 83 50 Legal notice having been published in the Kaples Daily Kews on April 8, 19ØØ, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication tiled with the Clerk" bJds were received for the purchase of one tractor with a boom IIOWer. Utilities ...tewater Director Cleaoß8 stated that this is tor the parcha8e ot a tractor witb a boo. aower to be used around the sewage traat:8ent plants for the aaintenance ot ponds and ber... Be indicated that Statt has reviewed the bid. and finds that Creel Ford Tractor CO8pany Js the low bidder tor the speoifJed aachinery and he recom- . 88Dd8 that they receive the award in the UIOunt of $3S,gsO. Ca tS.i0D8r Goo4n1ght 8OVec1" 88COnded by Coaat..ioner Pi.tor 81ld .. 114 rv.r.191 Page 35 -~..._._....... . .. 1l4ml92 MAY 17, le88 carried 8ft8ftt80a8ly, that Bid .88-1241 tor a tractor with a booa aower be ~ to Creel Ford 'tractor Co.~y in the UIOUDt of e3S,e&0. It- .... 8ID ft8-1224 ft)R on SLODcD BAOLI8Ø '!'RAILER AJn) on 'l'RACrOR - TRAILER AWARDm %0 0II&2'OJIJIA EQOIPMJDf~ COMPAn 18 THE AHOun 0-' e3e,8SS.1& AND 'fJtAC1'OR AMA.RDED TO IOOTB FLORIDA MACK 18 THE AHOOJrr OV 8&S" 195 . 00 Legal notic. having been published in the Naples Daily Hews on March 3" 1988, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, bic1s were received for Bid #88-1224 for one sludge hauling trailer and one tractor until 2:30 P.M., March 16, 1988. Water Operations Director Wewaan stated that this is a reco..en- dation for the Board ot County Co..i.sioners to award a bid for the purchase ot a tractor to South Florida Mack and the purcha.e of a trailer to OWatonna Equip.ent Coapany. He noted that the consulting engiDeers have evaluated leasing and purchasing ot this equipment and have recO88enc1ec1 purchasing as the 8Ost econoaical option for this .ervice. Be noted that invitations "ere .ent to 19 vendors with 7 respan4ing and Statf i. reco...nding that the tractor be awarded to South Florida Mack even though they "ere not the low bidders, but delivery ti.. was SO day. and the adcUtional 60-c1ay ti.. period tor the low bidder "ill cost the County an additional $10,200 in outside .ludge hauling services, and the ditference between the low bidder and South Florida Hack 1s $7,350, therefore, the Start's reco..endatioH is that South Florida Mack i. the overall low bidder .eeting all .pecifi- cations and "ill save the County $2,850. He stated that the Owatonna Page 36 ~-,- MAY 17,1988 &qviP88Dt Co8pany w.. the lowest bidder aeeting all specifications for the purchase of the Sludge hauling trailer. He noted that the total fis~al 18pact will be $9ð.661.7S and funds are available. CD fssiemer Goodnight lIOVed, seconded by Co8aiss1emer P1stor and carried UDaDi8ouely, that Bid #88-1224 tor one sludge baa11ng trailer be 8W8rde4 to Owatozma EquiPMnt Co8pany in the 8IIO11nt ot 839,866.75 8Dd that ODe tractor be awarded to South Florida Mack in the 8IIO11nt of '51,,7g5.oo for a total 88Ount ot 896,,661.75. Jt- nœ DUcohIOII 0'1 DIPOaIJIØ "ArER RZS1'R.tC'fIOD BY SOO'I'B n.oUDA WArn IIA"ðþ.- D~C'J' Utilities MaJnistrator Crandall stated that this it.. i. pri- aarily to bring the Board of County Co..issioners up to date on what has happened with the SFWKD and water restrictions. Be noted that l..t week the SFWMD invoked a water shortage and a voluntary cutback 00 water uaage. Be noted that a special area was designated, which is DOrth of Davi. Blvd. and west ot I-75, because this is the area that 1.808t 8U8Ceptible to saltwater intrusion. He said that the County will be SUpporting this and giving 1ntoraat10n to the press on the -tter. Al80. if the rains do not OCcur during the beginning ot June. the County "Y choose to go to a aandatory cutback. tbJ. i8 818ply an update and no action i. needed. He stated that Ju. ftr1 coo.'¡;:If ""'-.GD AUTllOIUZEJ) TO IIEGO'rIAft WITH COLLIER DEVELoPMJDn' CORP. &lID DRAIIOnIS/GARGuILO FOR A COnRAc1' TO PURCHAsE A )'ACILI'l'Y TO HOUSB 1'D Ð&Y&LOPlCDT SERVICES DEPARDIDT AJfD TO JQOOTIAft WID GARGUILO )'OR LUD. ST.I.J'J' TO ALSO EVALUAft BOIL.DI.O SPACE REDs FOR TBZ IŒXT .&Y~"'-L YlrAItS - 114F1r~ 193 Page :)7 ." ..1l4w~194 MAY 17, 1988 County Manager Dorrill stated that this item concerns the Develop- aent Servlc~. Building Co..ittee and the concept that is being use~ to provide tor the t.cility in which to house the recently approved Deve- lop.ent Service. Depart..nt. He indicated that the Board of County Coaai.sJoners authorized this project and directed the County Manager to use a 8Odlfled type procurement approach in order to save time and cost a.sociated with building this government building. He stated that a. a result of this, as opposed to the County 80liciting for their own architect, engineer, acquiring a 8ite, and then putting the project out to bid, a request for proposal8 was prepared based on CouQty miniaua specifications and requlremen~8 for a turn-key private ~.loper type concept. He noted that this means that a private deve- leper would actually design, build and turn over to the County such a tac11ity. He noted that four proposals were received and in accor- dance with the general requirements, a committee and report has been prepared that analyzed each of the proposals that were received. He stated that the proposals were from $3 million to $5 million òepending on the proposer, the size of the facility being proposed, and its land and associated 8ite related costs. He indicated that the committee consisted ot Staft as well as a citizens sub-committee made up ot individuals who have assisted the County with the development services concept but who had no vested interest 1n the proposed building. He noted that the recomm~ndation is to take advantage of this type of procurement and to authorize the County Manager and the Page 38 MAY 17, 1988 Coun~ Attorney'. office to enter into negotiations and bring a contract back for the Chairman's execution. He indicated that the reco...nded proposer and develop.ent tea. is that subaitted by Collier Developaent Corporation. who has propos~d to build an approxim3tely 40.000 square foot facility to be located at the Collier Park of Coaaerce adjacent to Airport Road. He stated that the other proposals that were received consisted of a proposal froa Gary Carlson to deve- lop on County property by adding a twin tower to Building "F" with an associated parking garage; a proposal froa representatives of the Garguilo Trust for the adjoining vacant property to the existing governaent center to the east; and a proposal subaitted by Kev!n Stoneburner and other principle interests to develop a facility off Airport and Radio Roads in the vicinity of Westview Drive and Donna Street. In answer to Co..issioner Hasse. County Manager Dorrill stated that be bas worked closely with the County Attorney's otfice in obtaining the necessary legal opinions in advance of going out for proposals, adding that it is his understanding that the tact that the County has developed a coapetiti',e bid proposal atmosphere for which the proposals were solicited fro. any developer meeting the specifica- tions has been consistent with his ~indings and the proposed action thi. date. He stated that this is different from what has been historically done, but the rationale behind it is sound when compared to other projects ot a similar nature like the Courthouse and the aeee 114 ,.'.t 195 Page 39 ... 114"'.1.196 MAY 17, 1988 Health Departaent that have taken two years to design. He stated that it ls his understanding that the County is in accord with the necessary legal requireaents that have been established. County Attorney Cuyler stated that the legal requireaents have been met to thls point. adding that there are two items that the Clerk has concern. abou t . He n', ted that Stat t has sainly looked at the pro- posal process and the norsal bid process, ~dding that Statt is trying to decide at this point whether the Board ot County Coaaissioners W8D~. to negotiate with the nuaber one team 1hat submitted the propo- 841. Be stated that one question arises as to appraisal of the pro- perty and there is a statutory requ1reaent when the County purchases property that there has to be appraisals. He stated that at this point it i. not known who Statt will be negotiating the contract with and therefore, it i8 not known what land the County i8 looking at with regards to acquiring. He noted that he is checking into whether this wl11 fall under that requ1reaent, adding that it appraisals have to be obtained they will be. He noted that the Board ot County Commis- sioners needs to detersine who they want Staft to negotiate with and then Statt will have to tind out it a contract can even be nego- tlated with that teas or individuals. He noted that an item that was brought up by the Clerk's ottice is that the lowest and best bid can- not be detersined, adding that this Is a practical problem and Statt feel. that they can determine who Is the lowest and best bid and they have evaluated this. He stated that this is not a legal consideration, Page .co MAY 17, 1988 but a practical one because the data Is looked at and then the propo- sal. ar~ rL~ed in order, He stated however, if appraisals are neeGed. the County ~ill get appraisals. Clerk Giles stated that with regards to the County purchasing pro- pertyover $500.000, it would be wise for the County to have two appraisals to determine a negotiating position prior to negotiating. Øe stated that although Start aay teel that the fira being recommended 1. the 1owe.t and best. it cannot be deaonstrated through the intor- aation proviòed to the Board ot County Coaaissioners because ot the reasons that were stated in the memorandum presented to the Board. CO8Dis.ioner Saunders stated that the tiscal impact says that the 83.&5 aillion tor the project will be part of the $7.3 million sales tax revenue bonds and the bonds will be paid through user fees charged on a ~e tootage basis to the user of the building and questioned if this mean. that building permit tees will be raised sufficiently tor 100. of the cost of this facility or portion that 1s used by the new Devel°P8ent Services Departaent? County Manager Dorrill stated that this is correct, adding that the tee issue is a separate matter and will be incorporated into the budget that is submitted in 3uly and the tees will be increased as part of the adoption of the budget. County Manager Dorrill stated that it this building is to be an it.. in next year's budget. his budget will balance and will have the necessary tee increase to cover whatever debt service is requi,¡.'ed. He noted that the s..e thing will apply to the Utility Division. as they 80or 114 Fi',! 197 Page 41 - 114",,-198 MAY 17, 1988 will be an owner/occupant of this facility as well as any other Board office that aay be renting space. He noted that the County is not USing the typical historical owner/architect/engineer/general contra=- tor type procureaent 8&thod, adding that this is due to the cost 8avings and the ti8e savings necessary to bring this facility to exiateoc'!. Be stated that the County has not retained an architect to design a building, adding th~t the basic design and the cost of archi- tectural engineering and other tees are to be borne by the developer. Be noted that the developer will be under contract to design, do site work, and build a building to County specifications, adding that the basi. for thi8 decision i. consistent with t~e approach that is being U8ed . Øe noted that this. however, is not a typical type ot procure- 8eDt approach. Mr. Ray DeAngelis, representing the Garguilo tea., stated that they own the parcel ot property located next to the courthouse, noting that they have recently reviewed the Executive Suaaary on the Develop- aent Services Departaent facility. He stated that in the summary, the advisory coaaittee reco..ended a purchase from Collier Development Corporation of a 40,000 square foot facility to be located in the Collier Coaaerce Park, adding that his proposal was rated second behind the Collier Development C~rporation proposal. He indic«ted that he would like to request that the Statt and Board review his propo- sa! and take into consideration that his site 1s not only ideal in prox181ty and design tor th~ Development Services Building but 1s also Page 42 MAY 17, 1988 vital to the orderly growth ot the County complex. He noted that t~e co..ltte. gave considerable weight to the fact that there is an urgent need to expedite the i.ple.entation ot the development services con- cept. He stated that his proposal allows 2 months tor planning and 7 aonths for construction for a total ot 9 months for completion. He stated that the Collier Development Corporation proposal allows 3 aonths tor planning and 8 aonths tor construction for a total ot 11 aonths for co.pletion. He noted that a site is needed that is unen- cuabered by the congestion and tensity of activities by the government coaplex and would be nore convenient and resp~nsive to the nee~s of the ðevelopaent coaaunity. He noted that his proposal is adjacent to the governaent tac11it1e~ and would seem to be the most convenient location of any of the proposals. He stated that his building would be easier to manage tor the County due to its close proximity to existing facilities as it would appear to be easier to oversee an operation on site as opposed to off-site, adding that money sa7ings could result in the use ot governaent facilities like aaintenance crews tor the buildings and grounds, etc. He stated that the building t~at he is proposing has much more parking than what is required for a typical oftice building ot this size, adding that the additional parking could cure some ot the government parking probleas. He stated , that 1f the County ,does not n~gotiate an agreement on this parcel at the present tiae, it aay be developed into a retail center. He stated that he feels that it would be unwise and detrimental to the growth of ~C( 114 "r.t 199 Page 43 .. 114m200 MAY 17, 1988 the Governaent tacili~ie9 it the County does not acquire this land wh1le it 1s still available. He stated that the aajor difference in hi. proposal and the proposal ot Collier Development Corporation, is the cost of the land, but the location more th~n justifies the cost difference. He stated that h~ would request that the Board ot County Coaaissloners reconsider his proposal. Co..i.sioner Hasse questioned it Mr. DeAngleis' price is tirm or negotiable, to which Mr, DeAngelis indicated that the price is nego- tiable. eo..i.sioner Saunders stated that he has gone through the Staff report and he teels that 1t 1s poor planning to build a government building oft-site as all local governments try to bring all buildings into one area. He indicated that it would be a major ai.take to build a facility off-site and it would also be a mistake to proceed with such speed and haste that necessary things are not covered. He stated that he 1s opposed to the program simply because ot the way that Staft is proceeding, adding that he would like to have the Gargulio proposal re-evaluated w1th regards to buildlng a facility on that site. Mr. George Keller stated that this building started out as 20,(000 square teet that was ne~ded and now it is up to 40,000 square teet and various departments that are now renting property will be moving into this new building. adding that h~ feels that there is not enough inforaatJon to aake a wise decision. "ape .. Page 44 HAY 17, 1988 Mr. Xel1er questioned how and who is going to pay tor this building and all the services? He stated that the building permit tee1 are supposed to be increas~d, but if they keep going up, there w111 be no such thing as affvrdable housing. He indicated that he has not seen a financial analysis that was SUpposed to be done. He noted that the Board of County Coamissioners may have the answers, but the ~11c does not have the answers or the figures. H~ stated that he teels that it would be difficult tor administrators to control the various departaents if they are not located on site. He indicated that the property next door should be looked at closely and if it is purchased and built on, it should be built so that the buildings can go up higher 1n years to Co.e. Mr. Richard Braun stated that he teels that a five-story building shocld be built, but the last two stories should not be coapleted at this time. He noted that the Planning Department and the Zoning Departaent should be self-sufficient so that the Building Department i. not paying all the fees. He noted that all these aatters should be addre.sed so that there is no ad valorem tax increase to the taxpayers in Collier County. Mr. Van Miller, representing Kevin Stoneburner, stated that his proposal was rated least desirable by the committee. He indicated that his building co.plies 100% with rhe specifications prepared by the County and the site is 5.2 acres and Is located off Airpor~ Roaö on W..tview Drive. He noted that this is a previously approved office '* 114 nr.{ 201 Page 45 ¡:, .. 114 WI. 2œ MAY 17, 1988 POD. ø. noted that his propos~l is Meeting all specification and is auch closer than the recoaaended proposal and is also the least expen- slve. Øe noted that there is also tire protection sprinkler coverage tor the entire building, which is their addition that w~ not included in the specifications. He noted that he is willing right now to sign a contract at the price that was specified in his proposal and construct the building according to all specifications. Co..issioner Piator stated that he would like to enlarge the County caapus with another building and feels that everything should be built at the saDe CoMplex instead of having people drive allover the County to do their business, He stated that he is a little upset with the price of the property that is next door and possibly, there could be discussion with regards to that. Cc t..Ioner Pistor 8OVed, seconc1ec1 by Co..ls.loner Saunders, that the CoaDty Manager be authorIzed to negotiate and talk to the tirst two 8agge8~ec1 te...; Collier DeveloP8eDt Corp. and DeAngelie/Gargulio and br1Dg _id negotiations back to the Board: a1.0 to negotIate if ~ with DeAngells/0argu110 about purcha8Ing the land: and to evaluate the otfi~e nee4a of the County for the next several years. Co..issioner Goodnight stated that wh~tever negotiations take place should be done in the best interest ot the County, adding that she teels that everything should be as close to this caapus as possible. She stated that it 1s going to be difficult for Statt to be running around the County trying to get the answers to questions that Page 46 MAY 17, 1988 ar - needed. Coaaiaaioner Piator stated that the problem that he sees with building an adjacent building right on campus is the parking during conatruction and the aeS$ that a new building creates while constructing it. He stated that this is why he is not in favor ot building another building ?n site. but the Gargulio property is far enough away so that the County would not be experiencing these type of proble.. while construction is going on. UpoD call tor the question, the aotion carried unaniaously. County Manager Dorrill stated that it will be very di!ticult to enter into aiaultaneous negotiations with the two suggested firms and be able to resolve anything before the Board vacation, adding that he is DOt opposed to any ot the tour projects but this is also not something that he can do 1n two weeks. ..... -.c..s: 1:20 P.M. - Reconvened: 1:2S P.M. at which t1ae Deputy Clerk Bottaan replaced Deputy Clerk Kenyon ..... It- ..91"2 1II1T11 8ARJŒY, MAJlAGD, AJrD ALa 8ROWJI AJrD SO.S, Co-KUAGD AJrD UYIWlIh&ltT 8AJrDRS FOR THE SALE OF 87.3 MILLIO. SALES TAX REVElroB 8OJIDS - APPOIJlTED County Manager Dorrill advised that recommendation is being made to appoint investment bankers as a result ot the selection to have Saith Barney and Alex Brown Co-Manage the potential Development Services Building. He stated that Staft has been negotiating the ao~~ 114,ar,l203 Page 47 '"-~._. ... 114 PI« 204 MAY 17, 1988 ..sociated fees. per direction of the Board, and is requesting the appoint8ent of the investaent bankers for the sale of that potential i8aue. when it is resolved what the County wants to purchase. ~ t..ioaer SaUDð.rs aovec1, seconded by C088is.loner Pis tor and carried unan18oualy, to accept Staff's recoaaen4atlon that S.ith 8arDey, M8D8ger, and Alex Brown and Sorw, Co-Manager and Investment "ft~~ be appo~tec1 tor the sal. of $7.3 .ill10n dollars In Sales Tax .. " tia- 8oDd8. It- ~1 nu COJISOLIDATIOJr S~UUT COtOfITTEE - LIST or CIVIC GROUPS AJID ORGurIU1"Imrs 1'0 PARTICIPATE TO BE BROUGHT &\C1t TO BCC AJro PBÅSE I TO A COIG'f.I'RD WI TB I . S I ][ MO RTBS Eaergency Services Adainistrator Reardon stated that three months ago tht: 2~re Conaol1rl.at i(> \ l;.~k Force CollUlaittee presented its report to the Board ot County Coaaissioners. adding that the Board directed Statt to review the study .and discuss it with all concerned pirties, Including the District Fire Chief's. He indicated that this has been done. and a suaaary of the deliberations, and a three phase action plan Is presented today. Mr. Reardon advised that there has been agreeaent and disagreement with the various portions of the report, but everybody concurs that there are proble.s, and that it is tiee to move forward and address the proble.s. He indicated that the proposed solution i. a three phase action plan. that 1s supported by the District Fire Chiefs, Protessional Pirefighter'~ Association, Volunteer Firefighting Page 48 MAY 17, 1988 .l...n~. In the County, the County's Fire Marshal's Association, and representatives fro. the 911 Dispatch Center. Mr. Reardon stated that the first phase will take approximately 11 aonths to coaplete, and encompasses three groups: Fire Service pro- fesslanals throughout the County that will identify and evaluate where the Fire Service Delivery System is standing and what o~tions the County has to DOVe forward; the second group is a Citizens Group, aade up of individuals throughout the County that are unbiased and able, after being educated about the Fire Service Delivery Systems, to present recoaaendations to the Board; the third group is the Project Teaa Group whose task is to provide horsepower in supporting Groups 1 and 2. Be advised that the first phase will be brought back to the Board of County Co_issioners in approxilD8te.1y 11 or 12 .onthtl from now. Tape n Mr. Fred~. Voss, President of the Greater "aples Civic Association. stated that it is time to get on with the job. He noted that be feel. the Staff recoaaendation of 11 months is unnecessary, eugg..ting a timetable of three aonths. He stated that the C~vic Association urges the Board to get on with the job, consolidate the Fire Departaents, cut the insurance rates in the County and all the , aany benefits whic~ would come from consolidation. Co..issioner Pistor mentioned his concern that after the County decides bow to go ahead and what is to be done, it will have to go '°0( 114 ,&~t 205 Page 49 ---", .. 114 Wøf. 200 MAY 17, 1988 before the Legislature. Mr. Reardon. in answer to Co..issioner Hasse stated that he met with the Fire Chiefs and they atteapted to identify what was not in the initial study Task Force Report. He stated that he does not disagree with Mr. Voss, but it its to be done right, the program can- not be rushed. Bill Davidson, Assistant Chief of Operations tor the East Raples Fire Departaent, requested that the Board view Mr. Reardon's Executive Sn--.ry as acre of an opinion than a total factual document. He staa;e4 that there are point. that hi. Deparh~ent does not totally agree wIth, noting that East Waples Fire Departaent does not agree that there Is a proble., adding that they are anxious to participate in the sb1c1y. Mr. George ~eller stated that it should be deterained it there is a proble., and then have a public hearing to discuss pros and cons. CD ,..ioner SauDders aovec1, seconded by Coaaissloner Pi.tor and carried UD8D1IIou8ly, that the action plan be approved, with Phase I CO8pleted withIn sIx aonths to allow tor LegislatIve draftIng, and a lIst of the civic groups and organizations intere.ted in participating 1D tbe Study to CO8e back to the Board. Mr. Voss'. tinal cozaent was it Phase I is not completed within 6 aonths, it aay go on forever. It- _lOA 8Onc& m PROCEED TO THE TAX COLLECTOR ~OR TAX DEED APPLICATIORS OR 1..1 coa_t. TAX CERTI~ICATES - STAFF TO SELECTIVELY REVIEW ~lnCAns Page SO MAY 17, 1988 County Attorney Cuyler stated that subject recoamendatlon Is for those situations where someone does not pay their taxes tor a certain year on a parcel of propertï. adding that a tax certificate is sold for tho.. taxes, and pays those taxes on behalf of that person, and holds a tax certificate. He noted that as time goes by, the tax cer- tificates aay be redeeaed. and an application can be aade for a tax d~. Be advised that 1n the past the Statutes read that "the County aay apply for tax deeds". however, aaendments have been aade to the Statutes which now say "the County shall apply for tax deeds". He noted that proposed legislation. which he feels will pass. will change the language back to the County "raay apply for tax deeds". He stated that the real issue is whether the County is going to give its Xotlce To Proceed to the Tax Collector, adding that there are 500+ parcels to consider. soae of which are in the Big Cypress Preserve. and 8O8e are in Golden Gate Estates. He indicated that the County auat decide if it wants to pay the application fee of $187 per parcel, and apply to the Tax Collector. and through his office and the Clerk's Office. bring these parcels to sale. He advised that the opening bid tor 8O8eOne to purchase that property are the County's application costs, which the County would recover, plus all the outstanding tax certificates and .iscellaneous costs. He stated that the Statutes advise that the County should do this, but financially, there are title proble.. 1n the Big Cypress Are~. . Co..lssioner Saunders stated that it it is not financially .en- &01)( 114 'a'.~ 207 Page 51 .. ll4 PI(,t 208 MAY 1" 1988 sible to do thi8. it 8hould not be done. Cc t..iooer Pis tor aoved, seconded by Coaaissioner Saunders and carried ~t80U8ly, not to proc'!te4 to the Tax Collector, but that .taft be iD8tructed to selectively review the delinquent certiticates, for bid 8818. It88 _11A2 8UDO&%~'-I~;¡-S 88-280/28& - ADOPTED Finance Director Yonkosky 8tated that Budget Amendaent 88-286 was inadvertently placed o~ the agenda, noting that it requires a public hearing. Cc t..iooer Sau.ncSers 1InVec1, ..conded by Co_issiemer Pi.tor and carried anan1aoualy, that budget aaenc1aents 88-280/28& be adopted. It- .11&3 80~ """WLPT RESOLtJTIO. 88-2& - ADOPTED Co t..ioaer S8UDder. 8OVec1, seconded by Co_issioner Pistor and carried ~nl80U8ly, that Budget A8enc1aent Resolution 88-2& be 8dopted . Page &2 ... 114M21O MAY 17, 1988 Itea .12& auoLOTIOII 80. 88-113, APPOIJlTIWG IRVIWG BERZOW, IRA £VAlIS, BOB D&SOWSD, ELLIE mID, .JCD MAJlISn, .JOW nAIaD, AJID Ii&IIJd STROZIER TO Tn SOLID MASTa ~A.GUIÞ f ADVISORY C~J~ - ADOPTED The following recoaaendations were aade tor I So11d Maste Manageaent Advisory CoaaIttee: appoi~aents to th! Co_issloner C0881ssioner C0881ss1oner C088Issioner Coaaissioner Hasse - John Manslka GoodnIght - EllIe Krier Pistor - Ira tvans Glass - IrvIng Berzon Saunders - Jon Staiger Cc 1..1oaer Saunders lIOVed, aeconc1ec1 by Co_ie.ioner Pistor and carried ftftaftt8QU81y, that .John Man8ika, Ellie Krier, Ira Evans, Irving 8e~~ aDd DT. .John Staiger be appointed to the Solid Waste Management Ab t8ory Cc tttee. After casting votes for the two at-large members, Bob KrasowskI and Henry StrozIer had three votes each. ~ t..lcmer Sa1mders lIOVed, ..conded by Coaaiseioner Ba..e and carried ".uSIIOU81y that Bob Kr880W8kl and Henry Strozier be appointed .. at-large ~re to the Solid W..te Manage_at Ac1vl80ry Coaaittee. Page 53 .. 114 rw. 212 MAY 17. 1988 It.. _128 P&IITI08 wo. R-81-36C. RECOWSIDERATIO. OF CARLTO1f LAKES POD - TO BE ItUD'lERTI SED U'D REHEARD 011 .1U1fE 1 , . 1 9 8 8 Co '..100er Pistor aoved. seconded by Co..issioner GoodnIght and carried Q~i80Q8ly, that Petition R-81-36C. reconaIc1er.tion of CarltOD Lake8 POD be rea4vert1aed and beard on .June 14" Ha88. It- _12D USOLOTIOII 80. 88-114. EJlCOORAGI.G THE WISO. COMMO1fITY COLLEGE BOARD OW -¡auzu~ TO MAIIITAI. THE COLLIER COU1fTY BRAJIICB O~ WISO. COMMURITY eot-t-,..œ AS TJŒIR TOP PRIORITY FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMEBTS - ADOPTED eo--t..~oner Saun4er. 8OVed. .econc1ed by Co..issioner Goodnight 8D4 carried ftftAnS8QU8ly. that Resolution Wo. 88-114. encouraging the ~8OD Co88anlty College Board of Trustees to 88intain the CollIer Coanty Br&r~h of EdI80n Co88UDity College.. their top prIorIty for Cap1~ I8prov~t. De adopted. Page 54 MAY 17. 1988 It- _13& PAR'l'-TDIIt POSITIOW OJIDER COURT ADMIWISTRATIOW AXD RELATED PROGRAM 8(lDO&~ or GOAJU)IAJf AD LI~ COORDIWATOR - APPROVED ~..loner Pistor aoved, seconded by Coaaissioner Saunders and carried ftftaftf80U81y, that the part-time position under Court A~.tft'8tratiOD 8D4 related prograa budget of Guardian Ad Lite. CoordJ.Dator be approved. ... Co fssloaer Goodnight aoved, seconded by Co..issioner Saunders 8D4 carried unanlaoualy, that the following ite.. be approved and/or adopted UDder the Con8en t Agenda: It- .1"81 LAEE TRAFFORD MEMORIAL CEMEl~xY DEED KOSo 5"3. 545, 648 See Pages ~ () - a- ~ ~ It- .1"82 BID .e8-12"5 &MARDEn TO SWART LAKDSCAPIRG, IWC. rOR WORE AT RAPLES MnTAR'I' t..UDWI LL Legal notice having be~n published in the Naples Daily News on April 20, 1982, as ev~denced by Affidavit ot Publication filed with the Clerk Bid #88-1245 was received until 2:30 P.M., May 4, 1988, tor seeding, fertilizino and 8ulchino ot Cells 3 and 4 at Naples Sanitary t.endtill. It- _1"83 rnrAL PLAT OF ItIVERWOOD EAST, tnrIT 4 WITH STIPtJLATIO8 aooc 114,.,,[215 Page 55 ... U4w.t216 MAY 11, 1988 Pinal plates) not to be recorded until the required i.provements have been constructed and accepted, all construction to be complet'!d within 36 aonths and that Lots 57 and 58 not be record~d as buildable I lot. anI... all environaental concerns have been addressed. It.. _1484 - Continued to &/24/88 Itea -1485 PDBL%C "~.í8G MAY 24. 1988 RE REVOCATION OF CERTIFICATES or PUBLIC C().V&8~a AJrD DCESSITY FOR FLORIDA AÐVÞxuKE TOURS II CHARTERS, IIIC.. V&x&.K.US CAB CO.. --!fC. A.WD S1fYDER'S TAXI It... _14M rYXAL PLAT OF VA8DERBILT VILLAS FOR RECORDIKG - SECURITY ACCEPrED- CO.StK",*"'TIOJr AJrD MAIJlTDUCE AGREÐŒKT OF SUBDIVISIOJr IMPROVEMERTS See Pages -éL~ .3 .. It- -lCCI ~:J..s- SOCZAL SlàvlCES CASE .0. H-135C3 It- .1~2 JtUOUJ'rIoa a.-115. ACCEPTIG CHARITABLE COJITRIBtJTIOK rROM AZTJfA cwa".rn-u. GOLr TOt1RJrAMEJIT FOR SERVICES rOR SDIORS See Page ddb Itea _lCD1 P8.Dk..a....0JI PLACE AT IfIGGI.S BAY - PRIKCETOIf PLACE AT IfIGGIXS a~Y FIRE LXIZ - MATER PACILITIES ACCEPTAXCE Recorded in O.R. Book 1350 , Pages 809-822 Itea _lCD2 AG-.r;-An WIn JlAPLES CBRISTIA.8 ACADEMY AJlD FLORIDA CITIES WATER COMPAJrY TO ALLOW TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE Agreeaent to allow Naples Christian Academy to temporarily connect to Plorida Cities Water Co.pany tor water service until such time as Page 56 HAY 17, 1988 the County's water syste. i. installed along Santa Barbara Boulevard to a point parallel with Naples Christian Acade.y. See Pages ~~?-;).d.'l It.. .1403 ¡OP..~.r~ FOR LEGAL SERVICES WITH BARTS.IELD AHD FIXEL FOR ACQUISITION OW SAUTARY SEMAGE PUMP STATIO. SITES FOR SOOTH COU1lTY SEND SYSTEM PRO.JECr See Pages ~ .a 0 - dt3-L- It- _1"81 ClJl"fl'lC.t.TU FOR COJUlECTIOW TO TAX ROLLS 1987 Tangible Personal Property 808. 1ge7-119/120 It.. _1482 Dated 05/03-0&/88 EXrRA A&~ TIME FOR IWMATES .OS. &21&6. &7731 ABD 34928 It- _1483 SA'fISJ'ACTIOIIS 07 LIDS RZ PUBLIC DUDDER See Page. ~ 3~ - ¡2 "-~ ¥- It- .148 IUICn,t-AJIZOOS CORRESPOIfDEJrCE FILED .uD/OR REFE1UUD The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed and/or referred to the various departments as indicated below: 1. Letter dated 04/14/88 fro. L. P. Coe, Controller, Cable Vision Industries, enclosing audited statement of revenues tor year ending December 31, 1987. Referred to Heil Dorrlll, Ken Cuyler and tiled. 2. Letter dated 05/04/88 fro. Wayde P. Seidensticker, President, Canadochly Cable Coaaunications, Inc., advisi~g that they are applying for franchise authority to pro~ide cable tele- vision services to the residents ot Collier County east ot aDO( 114 Far,l 217 Page 51 .. 114,1£,( 218 10, MAY 17, 1988 1-75 and froa a point one aile south of laaokale. Road north- ward to the Lee County lin~ and eastward a distance of 25 ailes. Referred to BCC, Neil Dorrill and filed. 3. Letter dated 05/02/88 froa Douglas L. Fry, Environmental Manager, enclosing short fora application (Fi1e No. 111486615 and 111486645), which involved dredge and fill ac~ivlties. Referred to Neil Dorrill, Dr. Proffitt and filed. 4. Letter dated 05/02/88 froa Douglas L. Fry, Environmental Manager, enclosing short for. application (File !fo. 111487645 and 111487705), which involved dredge and till activities. Referred to Neil Dorrill, Dr. Proffitt and filed. 5. Meao dated 05/02/88 to Thoaas Crandall, Utilities Adminis- trator, froa Ronald F. Cook, CPA, regarding Goodland Water District lnteri. Financial Stateaents for the period ending March 31, 1988. Referred to BCC, Lvri Zalka and tiled. 6 Meao dated 05/02/88 to trator, fro. Ronald F. Sewer District Interia ending March 31, ¡gee. filed. Tho..s Crandall, Utilities Adminis- Cook, CPA, regarding Marco Water and Financial StAteaents for tI.t; þ~= lod Referred to BCC, Lori Zalka and 7. Letter dated 04/26/88 fro. Mary Ellen Hawkins, acknowledging receipt of RCC Resolution No. 88-77. Referred to BCC, Neil Dorrill ahd filea. 8. Letter dated 04/26/88 from Mary Ellen Hawkins, acknowledging receipt of BCC request for $100,000 of state money to fund feasibility study for a regional jail facility. Referred to BCC, Heil Dorrill and filed. 9. Minutes - F lled 04/28/88 - Collier County Planning Coaaission 04/12/88 - Golden Gate Parkway Beautification Adv~sory Committee and 05/10/88 agenda Notice dat~d 05/06/88 from Springlock Scaffolding, Inc.. advising that they hav~ furnished services and/or materials for Collier County Government Center Chiller Bldg. K under an order given by Kraft Const Co. Referred to Neil Dorr!ll, Skip Camp and tiled. ,--.-". MAY 17.1988 11. Me8orandua dated 05/04/88 to BCC fro. SherIff Aubrey Rogers, attaching Sheriff's ConfiscatIon Trust Fund ~1rst Quarterly Report - 1988. Referred to BCC, Nell Dorrl11, Lori Zalka and filed. 12. Letter dated 05/05/88 frea Robert L. Patton, Tax Collector 8 office, attachIng ~Istribution recap showlng year to date totals of taxes collected net of discount for 2985/86, 1986/87 and 1987/88. Referred to Lori Zalka and tiled. 13. Letter dated 04/08/88 tro. Noraan E. Feder, District Director, PlannIng 6 Progra.., ~lorIc1a Departaent of Trans- portatIon, enclosing the .FInanclng the 1988 Strategic TransportatIon Plan-. Reterred to ..11 Dorrl11 w/Plan, GeGrge Archibald and tiled. It- n611 ltØOurrI08 86-118 AI'I'OInIJt8 II.UPØ DILrl TO 'ZD L8LY CIOLI' JarUDS UAUtb'.1CArI08 ADn8Olt1' coalJ1TTD See Page d.. .3 ,5- ... There being no further business for the Oood of the ~ounty, the _t1Dg waa adjourned by Orc1ar ot the Chair - Tl..: ls&& P.M. BOARD O~ COu.n COMMISS101ŒRS/ BOARD o~ ZONI.O APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVEJtJlI.O BOARD(S) OP SPECIAL DISTRICTS ownER ITS COJl'lROL AttU11'; J 01 I' :1~~.~ C. .~~ CLERK t2-.,d ~ ~ ~: ~.": ': ~, ~ ¿;J C, AIUIOLD LU GLASS. CllAIIUWI ";", -. 'l8siut;' 8pprov8d by the Board on ~ ? 1"'" o"" .. p.e8eDtø"" or .s corrected , aoOl( 114 FI(.~ 219 Page 59