Agenda 10/14/2014 Item # 9A Proposed Agenda Changes
Board of County Commissioners Meeting
October 14,2014
Move Item 8A to Item 17D: Pursuant to Florida Statutes§380.115(1)(b), the petitioner has
demonstrated that all of the required mitigation was met in proportion to the amount of development
that existed at the time of this request, therefore approval by the BCC is ministerial.
This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing
be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in.Recommendation to approve a
resolution pursuant to Section 380.115(1)(b),Florida Statutes,approving the application for
rescission of the Town of Ave Maria Development of Regional Impact; providing for findings of
fact and conclusions of law; providing for approval of the rescission of the Development of Regional
Impact Development Order,and compliance with the post-rescission development with County
regulations; providing for conditions; providing for recordation; providing for severability and
providing for an effective date.The subject property is located north of Oil Well Road and west of
Camp Keais Road in Sections 31 through 33,Township 47 South,Range 29 East and Sections 4
through 9 and 16 through 18,Township 48 South,Range 29 East in Collier County,Florida
[Petition DRIABN-PL20130002016]. (Staffs request)
Continue Item 9A to the October 28, 2014 BCC Meeting: Recommendation
to deny the single petition within the 2013 Cycle 3 Growth Management Plan
Amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic
Opportunity for Review and Comments response for the Vincentian Mixed
Use Subdistrict Transmittal Hearing. (Petitioner's request)
Continue Item 16A1 to the November 18,2014 BCC Meeting: Recommendation to approve
final acceptance of the water,sewer and irrigation utility facilities for the Lipari-Ponziane
PL#20130002052. (Staffs request)
Withdraw Item 16E2: Recommendation to approve periodic auctions,acceptance of bids and/or
donations to 501C3 organizations throughout Fiscal Year 2015 for the disposal of Collier County
surplus vehicles and equipment and authorize transfer paperwork; and accept, ratify,and record a
report of those asset items once the disposal has been finalized. (Staffs request)
Move Item 16E4 to Item 11E: Recommendation to accept and ratify reports for staff-approved
change orders,changes to work orders and surplus credit for returned inventory. (Commissioner
Henning's request)
Time Certain Requests:
Item 10A to be heard at 9:30 a.m.
Item 11C to be heard at 10:45 a.m.
Item 11B to be heard at 1:00 p.m.
10/14/2014 8:51 AM
10/14/2014 9.A.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to deny the single petition within the 2013 Cycle 3 Growth Management Plan
Amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for review and
Comments response for the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Transmittal Hearing.
OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to review the 2013 Cycle 3 amendment
to the Collier County Growth Management Plan(GMP) for transmittal to the Florida Department
of Economic Opportunity.
CONSIDERATIONS:
• Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government's adopted
Growth Management Plan.
• The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the "local planning agency"
under Chapter 163.3174, F.S., held their Transmittal hearing for the 2013 Cycle 3 petition on
August 21 and September 4, 2014.
• This Transmittal hearing for the 2013 Cycle 3 considers an amendment to the Future Land
Use Element and Future Land Use Map.
Note: Because the support material (petition only) is voluminous, and some exhibits are
oversized, some of the backup documents are not included in the printed agenda package. A link
has been provided to the `I' drive on page 4 of this document in order to view the document. The
entire Executive Summary package, including all support materials, is available for review in the
Comprehensive Planning Section of the Planning & Zoning Department office, located at 2800
North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, including the Comprehensive Planning Section GMP
Amendments web page, via http://www.colliereov.net/index.aspx?pace=2460. The entire
Executive Summary package is also available in the Clerk of Courts/Minutes and Records office
at 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 4th floor, Suite 401.
Petition PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 is a petition submitted by Christopher Shucart, requesting
Future Land Use Element (FLUE) amendment to re-designate the subject site from the Urban
Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict.
The Vincentian Subdistrict site comprises 30.7 acres and is located south and east of Southwest
Boulevard, south and west of US 41 (Tamiami Trail East), and west of the Hitching Post Mobile
Home Park, in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East.
Among the factors analyzed are Background and Considerations, Commercial Analysis,
Apartment Analysis, Residential Density and Land Use Intensities, Appropriateness of the Site,
Consistency with Coastal High Hazard Area Policies within the Growth Management Plan,
Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Impact Study Analysis, and Public Facilities Impact.
The following findings and conclusions result from the reviews and analyses of this request:
• The subject site was approved in 1999 for mixed use development only—not stand-alone
commercial or residential development.
Packet Page -107-
10/14/2014 9.A.
• More than 12,000 approved, but un-built dwelling units are proximate to this site.
• The proposed Subdistrict proposed limiting residential development to market rate rental
apartments only, prior to the CCPC meeting, which correlated with the submitted apartment
study. Now, the petition proposes market rate residential development of any ownership
type, which means the type of residential development could be the same as the already
approved +12,000 units proximate to this site.
• The proposed Subdistrict would allow residential density of 10 [12 prior to CCPC meeting]
dwelling units per acre in a Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) location where additional
dwelling units (beyond 4 DU/A) can only be attained when qualifying for a density bonus,
but no qualifiers for density bonuses are met.
• Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Objective 3 and related Policies
limit public expenditures in the CHHA for certain public facilities needed to support new
development permitted by the Future Land Use Element. Approval of the proposed density
does not limit, but potentially expands, public expenditures in the CHHA. Florida Statutes
provide the basis for this CCME Objective and Policies, with specific provisions found in:
Section 163.3178(1), providing that local governments limit public expenditures in areas
subject to destruction by natural disasters, and Section 163.3177(6)6, requiring local
governments to limit public expenditures that subsidize development in coastal high hazard
areas.
• Based on data and analysis submitted for the supply of existing and potential commercial
development and demand within the market area for the subject site, the additional need for
the proposed commercial uses contemplated by this amendment to serve the surrounding
residential areas cannot be ascertained/has not been demonstrated.
Staff found the data and analysis for the subject Growth Management Plan amendment does not
support the proposed changes to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Coastal Fringe
Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. The proposed Vincentian Subdistrict is not
consistent with Coastal High Hazard Area policies or Future Land Use Element provisions
within the Growth Management Plan. Additional staff analysis of this petition is included in the
CCPC Staff Report.
FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts to Collier County as a result of this amendment,
as this is for the Transmittal of this proposed amendment. Petition fees account for staff review
time and materials, and for the cost of associated legal advertising/public notice.
Fiscal impacts to the County may result from this amendment if it is adopted. The Vincentian
Subdistrict proposes residential density of ten (10) dwelling units per acre in a location where
only three or four dwelling units per acre of market rate housing are allowed [within the Urban
Coastal Fringe Subdistrict (UCF) and the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA)].
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality. A majority vote of
the Board is needed for adoption of the Resolution. IHFACJ
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of the proposed amendment by the Board
for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity will commence the
Packet Page -108-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Department's thirty (30) day review process and ultimately return the amendment to the CCPC
and the Board for Adoption hearings to be held early in 2015.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: The site of petition PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 contains
approximately 12.66 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. Wetlands on-site are isolated with no
hydrological connection to wetlands or waters off-site. As part of the process of obtaining
subsequent development orders (e.g. site development plan), the site will be subject to all
applicable local, state and federal environmental protection regulations, including applicable
portions of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management
Plan, and the Land Development Code.
HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: No significant archaeological or historical
sites are recorded for or likely to be present within the Vincentian Subdistrict subject area, and it
is unlikely that any such sites will be affected. The site is subject to the requirement for
accidental discovery of archaeological or historical sites as required by Conservation and Coastal
Management Element Policy 11.1.3. If found to be present or affected, as part of the process of
obtaining subsequent development orders (e.g. site development plans), the site will be subject to
all applicable local, State and Federal protection regulations relevant to historical and
archeological sites.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION: That the CCPC forward Petition CP-2013-10 to the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation to deny transmittal to the Florida Department of
Economic Opportunity.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC
was provided with the recommendation to deny transmittal of the GMP Future Land Use
Element (FLUE) amendment as proposed by the petitioner. Staff also provided the CCPC with
revisions to the applicant's proposed Subdistrict text (for proper code language, format, clarity,
etc.) if they chose to recommend transmittal.
The CCPC heard CP-2013-10 during two separate hearing dates. During its initial hearing, the
applicant's agent presented a revised version of Subdistrict text. That version incorporated land
uses, intensity, density and other key Subdistrict provisions summarized as: allowing an entirely
residential development, an entirely commercial development, or mixed use (residential and
commercial) development; increasing residential density to a maximum of nearly 12 dwelling
units per acre (= 360 units); basing residential density upon total site acreage; removing the
residential limitation to only allow rental apartments; increasing commercial intensity to a
maximum of 250,000 sq. ft of uses as allowed to the C-1 through C-3 zoning districts; allowing
for an automobile service station and other commercial uses outside the C-3 District; and
retaining a minimum of 15%native vegetation on site.
During its continued hearing, a different version of Subdistrict text was presented by the
applicant's agent. This substantially revised version incorporated changes to: (a) limit the
increased residential density to a maximum of 10 dwelling units per acre (= 307 units); (b) base
residential density only upon non-commercial acreage; (c) relax the residential limitation to
allow any market-rate dwellings, not just rental apartments; (d)limit the increased commercial
intensity to a maximum of 250,000 sq. ft. of uses as allowed to the C-1 through C-3 zoning
Packet Page-109-
10/14/2014 9.A.
districts, with hotel and ALF conversions reducing this maximum; and, (e) allowing for
automotive fuel pumps accessory to another, larger commercial facility, and other commercial
Uses outside the C-3 District.
There were a number of public speakers, expressing concerns about impact upon owners of
businesses and residences in the area. In particular, speakers addressed the low residential
density of existing neighboring developments, and contrasted it with the high residential density
proposed in the Vincentian Subdistrict. Incompatibilities were identified and ways to minimize
them were discussed.
Interconnection was another issue discussed, as access to the commercial development to the
southeast would be beneficial, without having to use US 41 for every trip. Emphasis was put on
the growing traffic on both US 41 and Southwest Boulevard, and the accompanying traffic
problems.
Speakers located in the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park addressed the possible collaboration on
land uses adjacent to, on and through their recreation/storage area.
Speakers were apprehensive of such a wide-open proposal, where no specific plans for
development of the site were known or proposed.
The CCPC forwarded petition CP-2013-10, with the petitioner's changes, to the Board with a
recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity
(vote: 4/2), subject to a few clean-up changes to the text.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS:
Deny transmittal of petition CP-2013-10, as revised at the CCPC meeting,to the Department of
Economic Opportunity.
Prepared by: Corby Schmidt,AICP, Principal Planner, and David Weeks,AICP, GMP Manager,
Comprehensive Planning Section, Planning and Zoning Department, Growth Management
Division
Attachments:
1) CP-2013-10 CCPC Staff Report;
2) P-2013-10 Resolution with Exhibit"A"text and map
3) Application Backup Information (petition only); due to the size of the entire document it is
accessible at: http://www.colliereov.net/ftp/A2endaOct1414/GrowthMemt/op-
PL20130001767 CP-201.3-10 Petition Anplica.pdf
\bcc.colliergov.net\data\GMD-LDS\ODES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2013 Cycles&
Small Scale Petitions\2013 Cycle 3-October,2013.3 BCC Transmittal\13-1O Trnsmttl BCC exec summ_DRAFT.docx
Packet Page -110-
10/14/2014 9.A.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 9.9.A.
Item Summary: Recommendation to consider approving the 2013 Cycle 3 of Growth
Management Plan Amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic
Opportunity for review and Comments response, one petition only, Vincentian Mixed Use
Subdistrict Transmittal Hearing.
Meeting Date: 10/14/2014
Prepared By
Name: KendallMarcia
Title: Planner, Senior, Comprehensive Planning
9/16/2014 1:03:25 PM
Approved By
Name: BosiMichael
Title: Director-Planning and Zoning, Comprehensive Planning
Date: 9/19/2014 2:15:50 PM
Name: WeeksDavid
Title: Manager-Planning,Comprehensive Planning
Date: 9/19/2014 4:43:02 PM
Name: MarceliaJeanne
Title: Executive Secretary, Transportation Planning
Date: 9/23/2014 11:29:15 AM
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, Community Development&Environmental Services
Date: 9/24/2014 9:13:04 AM
Name: AshtonHeidi
Title: Managing Assistant County Attorney. CAO Land Use/Transportation
Date: 9/24/2014 12:13:25 PM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Director-Corp Financial and Mngmt Svs, Office of Management&Budget
Packet Page -111-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Date: 9/26/2014 10:38:04 AM
Name: FinnEd
Title: Management/Budget Analyst, Senior, Transportation Engineering&Construction Management
Date: 9/26/2014 11:30:32 AM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 9/29/2014 10:49:11 AM
Name: OchsLeo
Title: County Manager, County Managers Office
Date: 10/6/2014 12:03:22 PM
Packet Page -112-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Gbbal-0inoenban Mixed Use Subdistrict Ag=,ua="""
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/PLANNING AND REGULAT|ON, PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPARTMENT, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION
HEARING DATE: August 21, 2014
RE: PETITION CP-2O13-1O/PL-2O13-OOO17G7. Growth Management Plan Amendment
(TRANSMITTAL HEARING)
APPLICANTS/OWNERS/AGENTS:
Global Properties of Naples, LLC
Christopher Shucart, Manager
2414 Tamiami Trail Nurth, Suite 615
Nep\en, Florida 34103
Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq.
Hole Montes, Inc. Coleman, Yovariovich & Koester, P.A.
950 Encore Way 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, Florida 34110 Naples, Florida 34103
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The ±31 acre subject site is located south and east of Southwest
Bou|evard, south and west of US 41 (Tamiami Trail East), and west of the Hitching Post Mobile Home
Park, in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida.
REQUESTED ACTION: Amendments to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map
and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan, to introduce a new Subdistrict. This petition seeks
to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to
the Vincenban Mixed Use Subdistrict. (CP-2013'10 Resolution Exhibit A reflects the petitioner's
proposed text changes)
SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION:
Subject Site The subject site comprises ±31 mcras, and is designated Urban Coastal Fringe
Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map and lies within the Coastal High Hazard Area The site is
zoned Vinmendan PUD and is undeveloped. The PUD provides for a maximum gross density of 4
dwelling units per acre (on the Residential tract); assisted living facilities; and up to 115.000 sq. ft. of
commercial uses, including all permitted C-2, Convenience Commercial district uaas, community
theater amusement and recreation servioes, a miniature golf ooaree, bike and moped rental
amusement and recreation servines, auto & home supply stures, business eervioes, drinking places,
hosp|ta|s membership organizations, museums & art galleries paint glass & wallpaer stores, public
- l -
ZOl3'lC �/oca| Lrearmc \»;xe: Use Su��scn�
Packet Page -113-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
administration, non-depository credit institutions, real estate services, retail nurseries, lawn & garden
supply stores, social services, used merchandise stores, the USPS, and comparable C-2 commercial
uses (on the Commercial Intl/I tract). A detailed list of uses allowed in the PUD is provided further
. below.
Pedestrian sidewalks are on south side of US 41, along the entire frontage of subject site, and on east
side of Southwest Boulevard, also along the entire frontage of subject site.
Surrounding Lands
North of Subject Site: Across US 41, land is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban
Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map, and zoned Whistlers Cove PUD. Whistlers Cove
is developed with multi-family residential apartment buildings. The Lely Area Stormwater
Improvement Project facility is situated (north) east (within Eagle Lakes Park), across US 41. A
pedestrian sidewalk is on north side of US 41, along entire frontage opposite the subject site.
West of Subject Site: Land is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe
Subdistrict. An area zoned C-5, Heavy Commercial District fronts US 41 and is developed with an
automobile service station immediately across Southwest Boulevard; then with a self storage facility
further(north)west. The area behind the commercial development, and across Southwest Boulevard,
is zoned RSF-4 and developed as Trail Acres, a single family residential subdivision. A pedestrian
sidewalk is on west side of Southwest Boulevard, along entire frontage opposite the subject site.
South of Subject Site: Land is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe
Subdistrict. This area is zoned RSF-4 and developed as Trail Acres, a single family residential
subdivision.
East of Subject Site: Land is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe
Subdistrict, and zoned C-3 and MH. An area zoned C-3, Commercial Intermediate District fronts US
41 and is developed with a Collier County government service facility; then with a multi-tenant strip
mall further (south) east, with its parking lot fronting US 41. The area behind these government
service and commercial uses is the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park,with a mobile home park service
building and vehicle area located directly behind the government service facility.
In summary, along with the commercial development on the south side of US 41, the existing land
uses in the area immediately surrounding or directly opposite the subject site are predominately
residential in nature.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
Background and Considerations
The Vincentian PUD was originally approved in 1985 (Ord. 85-27)and allowed "80 residential units for
the elderly" on 10 acres for density of eight (8) dwelling units per acre; "a school, church, rectory and
related uses" on 10 acres; and, "institutional care facilities such as, but not limited to children's home,
residence for unwed mothers, family enrichment center, special educational center, etc." on 10.7
acres (31.7 acres total). The PUD was rezoned to a new Vincentian PUD in 1991 (Ord. 91-88), via
the County's implementation of the zoning reevaluation program, to lower the residential allowance to
30 dwelling units (3 DU/A on 10 acres) (31.7 acres total). In 1999, the PUD was again rezoned to a
new Vincentian PUD (Ord. 99-37)to allow 115,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses on 8.5 acres, residential
development at four(4)dwelling units per acre on 9.8 acres, and group housing/nursing home/ALF at
0.45 FAR (30 acres total). In this latter rezone, the allowance of commercial uses along US 41 was
deemed consistent with the FLUE via the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict. The commercial
uses allowed are: all permitted uses in C-2, Convenience Commercial zoning district; amusement and
recreation services - community theater, miniature golf course, bike and moped rental amusement
and recreation services; auto & home supply stores; business services, with exceptions; drinking
- 2-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -114-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
places, with exclusions; hospitals; membership organizations; miscellaneous retail; museums & art
galleries; paint, glass&wallpaper stores; public administration; non-depository credit institutions; real
estate; retail nurseries, lawn & garden supply stores; social services; used merchandise stores, with
exceptions; U.S. Postal Service, except major distribution center, and, any other commercial use
comparable with the foregoing and consistent with the C-2 district.
For all three rezones, the property was owned by the [Catholic] Diocese of Venice; was designated
Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (as it is designated today); and, was in
the Coastal Management Area then Coastal High Hazard Area-as it is today.
It is important to note that application materials suggest the uses generally described in the present
Vincentian PUD are the basis from which new/additional uses are proposed, and are not confined to
the permitted uses itemized above. This approach is reported further in the Comments Specific to the
Commercial Needs Analysis section, below.
Justifications(Refer to Attachment"B", Justification and Supplemental Information)
The justifications asserted in the application's supplemental information for the proposed amendment
are:
(1) The shape and size of the subject site allows for a variety of commercial use options;
(2) The area would benefit from additional commercial development;
(3) The commercial needs study identifies a need for additional commercial uses and a
deficiency in lands designated for commercial development;
(4) Low density residential development is not feasible in the current market;
(5) The site is well situated due to its access and exposure to an arterial roadway;
(6) There is a strong demand for market rate apartments;
(7) The minimum density necessary to attract a developer and quality design is considered to be
around 12 dwelling units per acre;
(8) The amount of commercial acreage and square footage is reduced in a mixed-use
development scenario;
An assessment finds only some of these justifications are supported by the petition's data and
analysis. Detailed analyses are provided further below.
Commercial Analysis (Refer to Attachment"E", Commercial Needs Analysis)
Generally, commercial development within a community can be categorized as strip commercial
development, neighborhood commercial, community commercial, regional commercial, and so forth.
Based on specific studies and/or demographic data for an area, such as population, income,
household size, percentage of income spent on retail goods, etc., an analyst is able to estimate
supportable commercial square feet for various lines of goods and services for that geography by
shopping center type. Relevant to the subject petition, a community commercial needs analysis was
provided in support of the requested commercial development.
The firm of Fishkind and Associates, Inc., conducted a Commercial Needs Analysis dated January 31,
2014 with an amended date of July 31, 2014, identifying the market conditions within a 5-minute, 10-
minute and 15-minute drive time from the subject site. This analysis provided an assessment of the
community commercial needs for the existing and projected population within the site's market area.
Analysis identifies that there is a demand for community serving commercial within the 10-minute and
15-minute drive-time market areas. The commercial square feet demand findings from the study are
as follows:
- 3-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -115-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
The community commercial square feet demand that can be supported by the area's population
projected in 2019 is 920,597 sq. ft. within the 10-minute drive time and 1,438,596 sq. ft. within the
15-minute drive time. To allow for flexibility within the market, the application of a 1.25 market
factor yields supportable community square feet of 1,150,747 sq. ft. within the 10-minute drive
time and 1,798,211 sq.ft. within the 15-minute drive time.
Staff Assessment:
Based on the data submitted with this petition it cannot be ascertained whether demand exists for
additional community commercial square feet at this location. Irregularities in the data presented,
such as the use of dwelling unit figures where commercial analyses typically use household
figures contributes to these irregularities. Employing dwelling unit figures where households are
being analyzed effectively over-estimates demand as household figures would not produce the
same results. Derivative over-estimations directly impact the household income calculations for
establishing demand. The application of the figures used produce an unrepresentative data set
and conclusions based thereon are inaccurate. [Note: A"household" is, by U.S. Census Bureau
definition, an occupied dwelling unit. Given the occupancy/vacancy rates in Collier County, there
is a significant difference in the number of dwelling units and number of households in a given
geography(countywide 67.5% occupancy/32.5%vacancy, but varies by Census Tract)]
Another example of inaccuracies produced by irregularities in the data submitted is the use of
population numbers- where the data sets based on Census geography may have been split by
the market area boundary. These are the Census sub-areas (Blocks or TAZs) used to calculate
the population and households within the market area. For those sub-areas only partially within
the market area, using whole - not partial - population figures over-calculates demand. The
application of the whole figures used produces an unrepresentative data set and conclusions
based thereon are inaccurate.
One more example of data irregularity is the all-inclusive commercial center types used in the
demand calculations and reflected in the Allocation tables appearing in Commercial Needs
Analysis. Household incomes available for spending on different goods and services (general
merchandise, food, entertainment, etc.) are distributed among all shopping center types and not
allocated further specifically to community commercial shopping centers- again, over-calculating
demand. The application of the "all center types" figures produces an unrepresentative data set
and conclusions based thereon are inaccurate.
The Commercial Needs Analysis reports a community commercial square feet supply of 2,437,398 sq.
ft. described as existing or potential community commercial floor area in the market area.
Staff Assessment:
Many of the community shopping centers listed in the Commercial Needs Analysis contain
developed outparcels which would seem to be integral components of the community shopping
center, yet are excluded. Staff finds an additional 318,540 sq. ft. for an estimated total of
2,755,938 community commercial development (comprised of the outparcels, omitted square feet
at existing centers - gardens centers at four different community centers, and differences in
square foot allocations for some community centers). See attached staff worksheet.
The data and analysis submitted to support the request addresses community commercial uses only-
but proposed Subdistrict provisions also allow neighborhood commercial development, regional
commercial development [including several high intensity C-5, Heavy Commercial uses], all office
development, and hotel/motel uses.
Staff Assessment:
Application materials over-estimate demand for, and under-estimate supply of, community
commercial development, and do not provide the supply/demand data & analysis for other
-4-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10, Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -116-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
commercial categories. Without such support, it cannot be ascertained that demand exists at
this location for additional neighborhood commercial square feet beyond the square feet
already approved in the PUD, or community and regional commercial square feet newly
proposed.
Apartment Analysis(Refer to Attachment"D", Rental Apartment Survey)
The firm of Fishkind and Associates, Inc., conducted a Rental Apartment Survey dated March 11,
2014 with an amended date of July 31, 2014, identifying the supply and demand trends and
associated pricing of the rental apartment market in the County. This analysis surveyed more than
forty apartment complexes including 100 apartments or more and assessed the housing needs for
[market rate] rental apartment, and found the following:
• Increasing Average Sizes and Rental Rates
• An Increasing Countywide Occupancy Rate: From 88% in 2010 to 97% in 2013
• A Countywide Average Size: Z 20 acres
• A Countywide Average Density: from z 11 units/acre to? 13 units/acre
• A Countywide Average Unit Count: z 231 units
The data and analysis submitted to support the request addresses a specific residential type -rental
apartments- and proposed Subdistrict provisions allow only rental apartments. Application materials
also review comparable rental condominiums, but do not provide the demand/supply data & analysis
for fee simple condominiums, single-family residences or other residential types. Notwithstanding
these absences,the demand for market rate apartments can be ascertained.
It is important to note that virtually all of the apartment complexes surveyed are located outside the
Coastal High Hazard Area, where such densities and unit numbers are appropriate and can be
attained. The County's limitations on density are detailed in the Consistency with Coastal High
Hazard Area Policies section below.
Residential Density and Land Use Intensities
The FLUE allows density in the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, which lies within the CHHA, to
exceed 4 dwelling units per acre only for developments qualifying for density bonuses by providing
affordable housing.
The Subdistrict proposes residential density of nearly 12 dwelling units per acre in a location where 3
dwelling units per acre are allowed [4 dwelling units per acre using the conversion of commercial
zoning density bonus, where applicable, or up to an additional 8 dwelling units per acre for affordable
workforce housing density bonus]-while no qualifiers for density bonuses are being proposed or met.
The Vincentian property presently allows for 4 dwelling units per acre based on the residential
component acreage for a maximum of 39 dwelling units. Proposed Subdistrict provisions base
density on the entire acreage for a maximum of 360 dwelling units. The amount of residential units is
not reduced proportionally with any reduction of acreage devoted to commercial development. By
way of comparison, the Whistler's Cove PUD meets affordable housing qualifiers for density bonuses
and is approved for a density of 10 dwelling units per acre.
Application materials present a basis/rationale for allowing residential density to be calculated based
upon total property acreage as an opportunity to maximize the site's development potential - without
the density bonus qualifiers met by comparable developments.
- 5 -
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -117-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
Appropriateness of the Site
The Mixed Use Activity Center(MUAC) Subdistrict allows the full array of commercial uses (C-1 thru
C-5 Districts) and residential density at a maximum of 16 dwelling units per acre, except within the
Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict (max. of 4 DU/A) and Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict(max. of
1.5 DU/A, or 2.5 dwelling units per acre utilizing the transfer of development rights). There are 19
MUACs; each is located at the intersection of two major roads, and they are spaced no closer than
two (2) miles apart as measured at intersection midpoints. FLUE Mixed Use Activity Center
Subdistrict provisions allow for establishment of new Activity Centers subject to the following criteria:
• Site must be situated at the intersection of two arterial roads or one arterial and one collector
road-as identified in the Transportation Element;
• Site must be located no closer than two(2)miles from another MUAC; and,
• Market justification must be demonstrated.
This amendment allows the option of developing the site with commercial uses as allowed in the C-1
through C-5 zoning districts, with some exclusions, or residential development at 11.74 dwelling units
per acre. Essentially, this Subdistrict allows the same commercial development use intensity as the
MUAC, and residential development at a higher density than a MUAC within the Urban Coastal Fringe
- albeit on 30.6 acres whereas MUAC quadrants were originally 40 acres each (now MUAC
quadrants vary from less than 10 acres to roughly 250 acres). No other subdistrict besides MUAC
allows the commercial use intensity proposed by this Subdistrict, and few others allow the residential
density proposed or the density calculation based on total site acreage within a mixed use project.
The subject site does not meet the first two criteria for establishing a new Activity Center and may not
meet the third criterion.
Community Desires (Refer to Attachment "C", Vision for the East Trail Corridor, and NIM comments
toward the end of this Report.)
Staff understands that this Vision document was not prepared at BCC direction nor presented to and
accepted by the BCC. Nonetheless, staff offers the following observations:
• General Urban areas in [East Trail Corridor] Segment 1 and Segment 2 are envisioned to be
primarily low to medium density residential in nature but should provide opportunities for mixed
use developments and live-work units, with quality landscaping and public parks, squares and
greens. The present Vincentian PUD satisfies this vision (at a density of 4 dwelling units per
acre), while the proposed Subdistrict would not (with a density of more than 11 dwelling units per
acre).
• The vision for[East Trail Corridor] Segment 2 does not seek more hotels or other non-community
commercial uses, while the proposed Subdistrict allows hotels [and many of these other non-
community commercial uses]. These inconsistencies between the proposed Subdistrict text and
the Vision document do not lend support to the request.
People attending the Neighborhood Information Meeting raised questions and concerns related to site
design and land uses. Find more information in the NIM Synopsis below.
Consistency with Coastal High Hazard Area Policies within the Growth Management Plan
As previously noted, the subject site lies within the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict (UCF) and the
Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). The CHHA encompasses all of the UCF, some lands north of US
41 East, and some lands north of the City of Naples (mostly west of US 41). The UCF Subdistrict
reads as follows: The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the
Conservation designated area (primarily located to the south of the Subdistrict) and the remainder of
the Urban designated area (primarily located to the north of the Subdistrict). The Subdistrict
-6-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001757
2013-10, Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -118-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
comprises those Urban areas south of US 41, generally east of the City of Naples, and generally west
of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Neutral Lands, but excludes Section 13, Township 51 South,
Range 26 East, and comprises approximately 11,354 acres and 10%of the Urban Mixed Use District.
The entire Subdistrict is located seaward of the Coastal High Hazard Area Boundary. In order to
facilitate hurricane evacuation and to protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation
designated area, residential densities within the Subdistrict shall not exceed a maximum of 4 dwelling
units per acre, except as allowed in the Density Rating System to exceed 4 units per acre through
provision of Affordable Housing and Transfers of Development Rights, and except as allowed by
certain FLUE Policies under Objective 5, and except as provided in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle
Redevelopment Overlay. New rezones to permit mobile home development within this Subdistrict are
prohibited. Rezones are recommended to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development?
The CHHA reads as follows: "Policy 12.2.5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element
(CCME) defines the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). The CHHA boundary is generally depicted
on the Future Land Use Map and is more precisely shown in the Future Land Use Map series; all
lands lying seaward of that boundary are within the CHHA. New rezones to permit mobile home
development shall not be allowed within the CHHA. The Capital Improvement Element and
Conservation and Coastal Management Element both contain policies pertaining to the expenditure of
public funds for public facilities within the CHHA"
Historically, the State has discouraged increasing density within the CHHA(so as to direct population
concentration away from known or predicted coastal high hazards and not to negatively affect
hurricane evacuation times). For the most part, so has the County. Only two density bonuses are
applicable in the CHHA - affordable-workforce housing, and conversion of commercial zoning [that
has been deemed consistent by policy]; other density bonuses are not applicable within the CHHA.
By way of example, the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay (depicted on the FLUM
and generally encompassing lands along Davis Blvd./US 41 East/Airport-Pulling Rd./Bayshore Dr.),
now entirely within the CHHA, promotes redevelopment, especially of mixed use projects. When the
County drafted the GMP amendment to create this Overlay in 2000, it included a traditional density
bonus as an incentive (ask for density increase via rezoning process) which would have allowed an
overall increase of density in the CHHA. The State objected. The County responded by revising the
amendment to establish a density pool derived from previously entitled density from the Naples
Botanical Gardens site(the density allowed by the zoning of that site prior to its rezoning to PUD); this
was acceptable to the State, This density pool provides for increased density of projects within the
Overlay via a reallocation of density, not a creation of new density, thus the overall density within the
CHHA is not increased.
For most rezones within the UCF, density is limited to a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre, and
typically just 3 dwelling units per acre due to the density reduction factor of minus 1 dwelling units per
acre for lying within the CHHA. The primary exception to 3 or 4 dwelling units per acre is for provision
of affordable-workforce housing, a density bonus of up to 8 dwelling units per acre. The conversion of
commercial zoning bonus is applicable in the UCF only to the extent of increasing density back to the
cap of 4 dwelling units per acre [4 DU/A(base density) minus 1 DU/A(CHHA reduction)= 3 DU/A; +1
DU/A (conversion of commercial zoning bonus) = 4 DU/A maximum eligible density for market rate
housing]. Outside of the UCF but still within the CHHA, the density cap is 16 dwelling units per acre,
not 4 dwelling units per acre [4 DU/A(base density) minus 1 DU/A(CHHA reduction) = 3 DU/A; +16
DU/A(conversion of commercial zoning bonus) = 16 DU/A maximum eligible density for market rate
housing].
Under the FLUE's density rating system, density is based upon the total site acreage less commercial
and industrial acreage, and less any acreage for uses with a residential density equivalency
established in the LDC; and, eligible density is not an entitlement. For the subject site, the maximum
eligible density is 3 dwelling units per acre for market rate housing or 11 dwelling units per acre for
-7-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -119-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
affordable-workforce housing (30 acres total minus 8.5 acres commercial tract= 21.5 acres x 3 DU/A
= 65 DUs, or, x 11 DU/A=237 DUs). Note: the existing PUD allows 4 dwelling units per acre, but this
density is based solely on the acreage of the residential tracts (9.8 acres x 4 DU/A=39 DUs).
Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 12.1.2 reads as follows: "Land use plan
amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases
in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times." The
applicant responds that consistency is met by agreeing to provide, as requested by the Bureau of
Emergency Services Director, a portable generator for use at emergency shelters.
Hurricane Mitigation Requirements
Collier County Emergency Management has reviewed the PUD and the associated hurricane
mitigation needs to aid in evacuation refuge efforts for this site. Staff has determined that the best
mitigation effort for this PUD would be for an off-site nearby public-shelter as is typically the shelter of
last-resort. These shelter(s) are determined and announced as the storm approaches Collier County
based on storm's intensity, surge model, direction of travel, time of day and day of week impact
among others factors.
Collier County is therefore requiring the developer to provide a new towable, quiet running, extended
run-time towable 45kW (minimum-kW) generator per Emergency Management's specifications. The
towable generator will be a one-time developer contribution based on the number of units currently
permitted to meet the hurricane mitigation impact for evacuation concerns. The generator
specifications must be pre-approved by the Department of Emergency Management as the County
has certain interoperable standards and required safety options.
The towable generator allows for additional evacuee capacities at various shelter(s)that can be used
based on the storm factors referenced above.
(Dan E. Summers, Director
Department of Emergency Management]
Environmental Impacts
Passarella and Associates submitted an environmental report, dated October 2013. Collier County
Department of Natural Resources personnel reviewed this petition and provided the following
analysis:
The subject site is an undeveloped 30.68 acre parcel located on the south side of US 41 in the Urban
Coastal Fringe Subdistrict. Surrounding properties are developed with residential and commercial
uses, with no preserves or undeveloped land containing native vegetation abutting the subject site.
The majority of the subject site is forested with native vegetation, mainly slash pine and pine/cypress
vegetative communities. Exotic vegetation occupies most of the site,with 50 to 100 percent coverage
with exotic vegetation. Also on-site are approximately 12.666 acres of jurisdictional wetlands.
Wetlands on-site are isolated with no hydrological connection to wetlands or waters off-site.
Listed species surveys were conducted on the subject site on March 6, 2012 and April 7, 1998 by the
environmental consultant for the petitioner. No listed wildlife species or signs of listed wildlife species
were observed on the property. A literature search by the environmental consultant found no
documented occurrences of listed wildlife species on the property and the property not to be located
in any state or federal agency designated habitat areas for listed wildlife species.
A letter from the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources indicates no significant
archaeological of historical sites recorded for or likely to be present within the subject area. The letter
also states that because of the property location and/or nature it is unlikely that any such sites will be
affected. The site is subject to the requirement for accidental discovery of archaeological or historical
-8-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001757
2013-10, Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -120-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
sites as required by Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 11.1.3. The
provision is also included in Subsection 2.03.07 E of the Land Development Code(LDC).
The subject site is not located within any County well field protection zones.
The proposed GMP amendment allows for the off-site retention of all the native vegetation required to
be retained on the subject property. Much of the subject site appears to already qualify for the off-site
retention of native vegetation provision in the LDC, which allows for preserves with 75 percent or
more coverage with exotic vegetation to be satisfied off-site. To insure the entire preserve
requirement can be satisfied off-site, an exemption to the restrictions in the LDC provision has been
included in the GMP amendment. Requests for deviations to the native vegetation retention
requirements in the GMP and LDC are allowed pursuant to Conservation and Coastal Management
Element(CCME)Policies 6.1.1 (10 & 13).The CCME Policies are as follows.
Policy 6.1.1 (10)CCME
The County shall adopt land development regulations that allow for a process whereby a property
owner may submit a petition requesting that all or a portion of the native vegetation preservation
retention requirement to be satisfied by a monetary payment, land donation that contains native
vegetative communities equal to or of a higher priority as described in Policy 6.1.1 (4)than the land
being impacted, or other appropriate method of compensation to an acceptable land acquisition
program, as required by the land development regulations. The monetary payment shall be used to
purchase and manage native vegetative communities off-site. The land development regulations shall
provide criteria to determine when this alternative will be considered. The criteria will be based upon
the following provisions:
a. The amount,type, rarity and quality of the native vegetation on site;
b. The presence of conservation lands adjoining the site;
c. The presence of listed species and consideration of Federal and State agency technical
assistance;
d. The type of land use proposed, such as, but not limited to, affordable housing;
e. The size of the preserve required to remain on site is too small to ensure that the preserve can
remain functional; and
f. Right of Way acquisitions for all purposes necessary for roadway construction, including
ancillary drainage facilities, and including utilities within the right of way acquisition area.
The land development regulations shall include a methodology to establish the monetary value, land
donation, or other appropriate method of compensation to ensure that native vegetative communities
not preserved on-site will be preserved and appropriately managed off-site.
Policy 6.1.1 (13)CCME
The County may grant a deviation to the native vegetation retention requirements of sub-sections 2, 4,
5, 10, and 12 of this Policy, and shall adopt land development regulations to set forth the process for
obtaining a deviation. The regulations shall allow for the granting of a deviation by the appropriate
review board after a public hearing, and for the granting of a deviation administratively. The County
shall consider the amount and type of native vegetation and the presence of listed species in
determining whether the granting of a deviation requires a public hearing, or may be granted
administratively.
The County may grant a deviation if:
a. County, Federal or State agencies require that site improvements be located in areas which
result in an inability to meet the provisions of this Policy, or
- 9-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10, Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -121-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
b. On or off-site environmental conditions are such that the application of one or more provisions
of this Policy is not possible or will result in a preserve area of lesser quality,or
c. The strict adherence to these provisions will not allow for the implementation of other Plan
policies that encourage beneficial land uses.
Given the above, staff supports the request to allow for off-site retention of native vegetation.
Pursuant to Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws
and Ordinances, the project requires review by the [CCPC acting in their capacity as the)
Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). A deviation to the provisions in the LDC on when native
vegetation can be satisfied off-site is being requested through the GMP amendment. The applicable
provision from Chapter 2,Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws
and Ordinances is provided below.
(m) Scope of land development project reviews.The EAC shall review the following:
(1) Any PUD that requests a deviation from environmental standards of the LDC or any
development order that requests a deviation from the provisions identified in GMP
CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13).
[Stephen Lenberger, Senior Environmental Specialist
Surface Water&Environmental Planning Section]
Historical and Archaeological Impacts
The historical and archaeological characteristics inherent to the subject site are addressed in
application materials. In a letter dated May 18, 1998 the Florida Department of State, Division of
Historical Resources writes, "a review of the Florida Site File indicates no significant archaeological or
historical sites are recorded for or likely to be present within the subject area, and that it is unlikely
that any such sites will be affected."
Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Impact Study Analysis, Including Transportation Element
Consistency Determination
Trebilcock Consulting Solutions submitted a Traffic Impact Study (TIS), dated October 18, 2013. The
substantive review of this document was done by the Transportation Planning Section, and their
review comments are provided below.
The petition indicates that [the subject site] is intended to have a corporate headquarters based,
mixed-use project. The new Subdistrict however, allows for all commercial, all residential, or mixed-
use (commercial and residential) development. The TIS analyzes it as a shopping center within a
single-use scenario and within a mixed-use scenario. Additional uses that exceed the trip generation
limits of the shopping center use have been proposed(i.e. gas station).
The land uses proposed are reconciled with the analysis in the TIS, reviewing the trip generation
characteristics of each potential use. The most impactful combination of trip generators has been
selected at the maximized square footage they could achieve, and a trip generation "cap" has been
developed that will become a condition of approval [in the companion PUD). The proposal may be
considered consistent with the Transportation Element of the GMP by way of implementing this Trip
Generation Cap at the zoning phase as a mitigation strategy to limit their impacts (which meets Policy
5.1 of the Transportation Element). Implementing the Trip Generation Cap ensures the TIS will be
consistent with the categorized land uses, and the PUD and FLUM will be consistent with one
another.
[John Podczerwinsky, Project Manager
Transportation Planning Section]
- 10 -
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10,Global Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -122-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
Public Facilities Impact
Development within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) is addressed in the Conservation and
Coastal Management Element (CCME). CCME Objective 3 and related Policies limit public
expenditures in the CHHA for certain public facilities needed to support new development permitted
by the Future Land Use Element. Application materials present the public facilities needed to support
the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict as follows:
• Water: The subject site will be served by Collier County Water District potable water treatment
and distribution system. Depending upon the development scenario (all commercial, all
residential, or mixed-use development),the estimated demand for potable water for the project
ranges from 28,000 to 42,000 gallons per day [Peak demand: from 78 to 117 gallons per
minute].
• Wastewater: The subject site will be served by the Collier County Sewer District wastewater
collection and treatment system. Depending upon the development scenario, the estimated
demand for wastewater for the project ranges from 25,000 to 38,000 gallons per day [Peak
demand:from 69 to 106 gallons per minute].
• Solid Waste Disposal: The service provider is Collier County Solid Waste Management. The
Annual Update and Inventory on Public Facilities (AUIR) indicates the County has sufficient
landfill capacity up to the year 2065 for the required lined cell capacity.
• Stormwater Management: Future development is expected to comply with the SFWMD and/or
Collier County rules and regulations that assure controlled accommodation of stormwater
events by both on-site and off-site improvements.
• Park and Recreational Facilities: There are no anticipated adverse impacts to park facilities
from the proposed development.
• Schools: There are no anticipated adverse impacts to public school facilities from the
proposed development.
• Emergency Medical and Fire Protection Services:The subject site is located within the Golden
Gate Fire District. The proposed increases of commercial intensity and floor area and
increases of residential density and dwelling units are anticipated to have minimal impacts on
these safety services.
(Kris Van Lengen, Principal Project Manager
Public Utilities Planning&Project Management Dept.]
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM)SYNOPSIS:
A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by LDC Section 10.03.05 F was [duly advertised,
noticed and] held on Thursday, July 17, 201, 5:30 p.m. at the Collier County South Regional Library,
Meeting Rm. "B", located at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples. Approximately 16 people other than
the application team and County staff attended-and heard the following information:
The applicant's agent provided a full description of the proposed GMP amendment to the group,
including that the amendment has a companion petition to amend the PUD. Together they will allow
for flexibility in design, in terms of allowing a mixture of uses.
The applicant desires any residential development to be higher density at market rate, and indicated a
commitment to preclude affordable housing. People voiced their concerns regarding affordable
housing and supported the applicant's commitment to develop only market rate housing.
People voiced their concerns regarding storm events and water run-off, and the distances water
management facilities, buffer plantings and berms would be to their properties. They also discussed
- 11 -
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -123-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
interconnection with the Hitching Post Plaza, and suggested that these features [indicated above] be
designed to not obstruct interconnection and afford the ability to create access. Land uses on both
side of this property boundary would need to be configured or reconfigured to keep this option open-
and both the applicant and the speakers were encouraged to pursue this further.
People voiced their concerns about the height limitations on buildings for the variety of different uses
allowed, such as the multi-family residential buildings, senior living facilities, hotels, and so forth. The
applicant's agent described their design as one providing"good"separation and substantial landscape
buffers.
Aside from the concerns summarized above no one in attendance expressed opposition to the
proposed GMP amendment. The meeting was completed by 6:30 p.m.
[Synopsis prepared by C. Schmidt,AICP, Principal Planner]
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:
The following findings and conclusions result from the reviews and analyses of this request:
• The subject site was approved in 1999 for mixed use development only - not stand-alone
commercial or residential development. The approved density of 4 dwelling units per acre based
only upon PUD residential tracts acreage yields less density than allowed by the FLUE (39 vs. 65
DUs).
• More than 12,000 approved but un-built dwelling units are proximate to this site, with application
materials explaining why this existing inventory cannot be used to meet the demand for more
apartments.
• The proposed Subdistrict limits residential development to market rate apartments only.
• Subdistrict allows residential density of nearly 12 dwelling units per acre in a Coastal High Hazard
Area location where additional dwelling units (beyond 4 DU/A) can only be attained when
qualifying for an affordable workforce housing density bonus, but no qualifiers for density bonuses
are met.
• The amount of residential units in mixed use developments are typically reduced proportionally
with the amount of acreage devoted to commercial development, but this Subdistrict bases
residential density on the entire acreage allowing for 360 dwelling units.
• To represent shopping practices in typical market analyses, a declining household percentage is
applied to the three drive times, the farther from the subject site the market area extends.
• Significant impacts to public facilities, as defined in the Capital Improvement Element, with respect
to Transportation, Potable Water Supply, Wastewater Treatment, Stormwater Management and
Solid Waste Disposal facilities will not result from this amendment.
• Based on data and analysis submitted for the supply of existing and potential commercial
development and demand within the market area for the subject site, the additional need for the
proposed commercial uses contemplated by this amendment to serve the surrounding residential
areas cannot be ascertained/has not been demonstrated.
• Adverse environmental impacts will not result from this amendment.
Staff finds that the data and analysis for the subject Growth Management Plan amendment does not
support the proposed changes to introduce a new Subdistrict by redesignating the subject site from
the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict.
- 12-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -124-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9,A
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This Staff Report has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient. [HFACJ
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CP-2013-10, as submitted, to the
Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation not to approve for transmittal to the Florida
Department of Economic Opportunity.
IF the Planning Commission chooses to recommend transmittal as proposed by petitioner,
staff recommends the following revisions to the applicant's proposed Subdistrict text (for
proper code language, format, clarity, etc. only- not intended to change allowable uses, intensities,
development standards or other items of substance):
Note: Words underlined are added -as proposed by petitioner; words giouble underlined are added,
words are deleted-as proposed by staff.
Insert on Page 46 of the Future Land Use Element:
17. Vincentian Mixed-Use Subdistrict
This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, awl is located on the south/west side of Tamiami
Trail East (US 41) ae iewn and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use
Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to erevido allow for a- o of neighborhood eF
community. and regional commercial development; residential development; and mixed uu
.uu- - -I• _'4-1 •- •••■-1 c 7 c -
The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging
residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict and/or the greater Naples area, and
to provide employment opportunities for residents in the
surrounding area. - ::-' '- - - - - - " : -
cleveloomootT The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a
mixture of residential and commercial uses.
The .- - •.„-1 • .. Subdistrict a- •1a• ,' , I- • • i'.. r '401'4,1 it - .•11 _l•
dards:
a. Allowable uses�All uses allowed in the C-1 through C-5 zoning districts, both by right and ty es
conditional uses, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the date of
adoptjon of this Subdistrict,_except as prohibited
below.
b. -_- _ : - _ . . . : --_ - - - - - - - - PrQhibites_uses:
1. Pawn shops (5932),
2. Adult book stores, adult video rental or sales, or any other use that is defined as a "sexually
oriented business"in the Collier County Code of Laws, 26-151 et seq.,
3. Animal specialty services except veterinary (0752); except outside kenneling and dog
grooming are permitted,
4. Automatic merchandising machine operators(5962),
5. Correctional institutions (9223),
6. Crematories (7261),
7. Farm product raw materials (5153-5159),
8. Fishing, commercial (0912-0919),
- 13-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10, Globa!Properties: Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -125-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
9. Fuel dealers(5983-5989),
10.Homeless shelters and soup kitchens,
11. Installation or erection of building equipment contractors(1796),
12. Local and suburban passenger transportation (4131-4173),
13. Marinas (4493 &4499) ,
14. Motor vehicle dealers, used only(5521),
15. Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified (7299), Coin operated service
machine operations. Comfort station operation, Escort service, Locker rental, Massage parlors
(except those employing licensed therapists), Rest room operation, Tattoo parlors, Turkish
baths,Wedding chapels, privately operated,
16. Power laundries,family and commercial (7211),and
17.Transfer stations (4212).
c. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards:
1. Commercial uses 1- will be limited to a maximum of 250 000 •uare feet • •.• .• -
floor area (GLFA), e and one hotel (444€44,maximum FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms),
and an assisted living facility(paeoE+maximum FAR 0.6).
2. Residential development shall will be limited to a maximum density of 11.74 units acre,
calculated on the gross acreage of the erajsel arooertv inclusive of any commercial portions,
for a maximum of 360 dwelling units.
3. If the project is developed as mixed user-Wok: ing`residential and commercial uses), the
residential density liaaifatiea allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the
commercial portion of the proiect shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a
maximum of 128,000 square feet of GLFA of commercial uses,and
a 150-room hotel not to exceed Q.6 FAR, and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR.
PQmmetcjal uses shall be limited to those uses permitted, 12y right in the C-1 through,.Q-3
zoning districts,
4. Under any of the development scenarios above, the average weekday nm peak hour
entering/exiting trip generation shall not exceed 1,107 total trips.
5. A-side-(one) Only one automobile service station is allowed; it may be located oeffaihaii
anywhere within the Subdistrict except, for mixed useslevelpPmertt, shall Da Juuited_to the
commercial tc.. . In lieu of an automobile service station access() fuel •um•s in association
with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility are allowed • .
6. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on
a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse,
and tennis courts.
d. Site Development:
1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD, Planned Unit
Development, Est I- - •1- • ••I-1 I- contain development and design
standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adiacent external uses, and
1. '1 •- -•11- ••1- Iy •1 -Al* -1•- • Ia .- -1 • I 1- •1• I• IN
operation are compatible with surrounding land uses.
2. The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be
submitted with et41he4ime.of the first Site Development Plart.
3. The unified planned development submitted at time of the first Site Development will
reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and
cross-access agreements.
- 14-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10, Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -126-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
-- --- 7777 7777 - --- - -- --'-'-- -- 7777 - -- -- -- •-
5. 4.•,Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties, where feasible, and
between internal buildings.
6. 5.,Building height shall be permitted to a maximum of 50 feet zoned and 57 feet actual.
7. 8,,The building setback from any of the Subdistrict boundaries shall be 50% of the building
height, but not less than 25 feet.
11666.
9. 7. At the time of Site Development, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied
off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1 (13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element
(CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. The portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site
shall follow the procedures of the LDC but not be subject to the restrictions and limitations in
the LDC on the vegetation allowed to be taken off-site, except that remaining portions of
preserve on-site shall be a minimum of one acre in size. If the portion of native vegetation
satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be
taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the
Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required.
10.8. Residential development shall be limited j ideveleped-as a market-rate
rental apartment project -- - - 7 7 7 7 -
Co1Rty.
As a second alternative: IF the Planning Commission chooses to recommend transmittal-but
without the residential component and limiting commercial uses to non-regional commercial
development - staff recommends the following revisions to the applicant's proposed
Subdistrict text (for proper code language, format, clarity, etc. AND to eliminate the residential
component, attempt to limit commercial to non-regional uses, and limit building floor area):
Note: Words underlined are added - as proposed by petitioner; words double underlined are added,
words are deleted-as proposed by staff.
Insert on Page 40 11 of the Future Land Use Element:
Policy 1.1:
The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts
for.
A. URBAN -MIXED USE DISTRICT
1. Urban Residential Subdistrict
2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict
3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict
4. Business Park Subdistrict
5. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict
6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict
7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict
8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict
9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict
10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict
- 15-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10, Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page-127-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict
12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict
13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict
14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict
15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict
16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict
B. URBAN-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict
2. Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict
*** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** ***
11. Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict
12. Vii.ncentiaa.�mmercial Subdistrict
Insert on Page 26 of the Future Land Use Element:
12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban - Mixed Use District, PUD
Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict, Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, Residential
Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Buckley Mixed
Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed
Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial
Infill Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict
Ise-Suidiist ; and, in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict,
Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict,
Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road Commercial Infill
Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston RoadNeterans Memorial Boulevard
Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict; Orange
Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, Vincentian Commercial Subdistrict,. in the
Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay; and, as allowed by certain FLUE policies.
Insert on Page 46 of the Future Land Use Element:
17. Vincentian Commercial use Subdistrict
This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, e 4 is located on the south/west side of Tamiami
]il East (US 411 s es-ohewn and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Ilse
Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to seawkis allow fore €e-ef aeiel4ber44004 OF
community commercial development. : .
The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve
the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict and/or the greater Naples
and 1,,.:_._:,:_:.. -_ -- _--_- -_ - • •rovide em•lo ment o••ortunities for residents
in the surrounding area. - •. _ _ 7 - 7 -
The develooment of this, Subdistrict shall comely with the following restrictions, limitations and
standards;
a. Allowable uses: All uses allowed by right in the C-4 C-4.414FewG4C6 zoning districts, as listed jn
•- • .I• •- - ••/I-I ••- 'I • I- •- v• -.••• .•I • I '1• it•
- 16-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10,Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -128-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
as esaditieaal upon, except as prohibited
uooc. listed-below.
- - - - - prohibited{use
.11. -11-1 .1• - '•1 :I • I.$•.•
S •n• -I - •1• a,• •al l .c. ah •I. •• 1 o - .•
3. Bowling centers, indoor(7933),
4. Motorcycle dealers(55711,
,
17.Trancfor ctatienc (1312).
c. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards:
1. Commercial uses shalt will be limited to a maximum of 200.000 a6o,000 square feet of arose
leasable floor area (GLFA), a :R a and a lilmeimurnll "v; 150 resins), and an
assisted living facility( maximum FAR 0.6).
4. 2, Under any of the development scenarios above, the average weekday pm peak hour
entering/exiting trip generation shall not exceed 1,107 total trips.
- 17 -
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10, Global Properties:Creating the Vincenban Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -129-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
5. 3. A oiatle-4one) Only one automobile service station is allowed-A may be located meted
anywhere within the Subdistrict. In lieu of an automobile service station, accessory fuel Dumps
in association with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility are allowed maybe
6. � A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed
on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool,
clubhouse, and tennis courts,
d. Site Development:
1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. Planned Unit
Development, ,--whie The rezone___emipappe shall contain development and design
standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses, and
operatiQt_are compatible vith surrounding land uses.
2. The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be
submitted with et-the tin4e-e€the first Site Development Plan_
3. The unified planned development submitted at time of the first Site Development Plan will
reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and
cross-access agreements.
5. A. Pedestrian connections are encouraged both with perimeter properties, where feasible, and
between internal buildings.
6. ,Building height shall be permitted to a maximum of 50 feet zoned and 57 feet actual.
7. 6,, The building setback from any of the Subdistrict boundaries shall be 50% of the building
height, but not less than 25 feet.
9. 7_.At the time of Site Development, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied
off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1 (13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element
(CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. The portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site
shall follow the procedures of the LDC but not be subject to the restrictions and limitations in
the LDC on the vegetation allowed to be taken off-site, except that remaining portions of
preserve on-site shall be a minimum of one acre in size. If the portion of native vegetation
satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be
taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the
Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required.
:.•:: - _ - -7'--_ - 7 7 - - = - ' - - - - weieot-te
Insert on Page 141 of the Future Land Use Element:
Urban Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map
Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map
Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map
Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map
Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map
Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map
- 18—
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
20.3-10, Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -130-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vncentlan Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A
Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map
Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map
Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map
Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map
Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict
Livingston RoadNeteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map
Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map
Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map
Coastal High Hazard Area Map
Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map
Vincentian Commercial Mixed Wee Subdistrict Mao
- 19-
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10, Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -131-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Global-Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Agenoa item U.A
PREPARED BY:
.n / ' ud .1 DATE:
Corby Schmid AICP, Principa Planner
Comprehensiv, Planning Section, Planning And Zoning Department
REVIEWED B
t1A4t DATE:
David Weeks,AICP, Growth Management Plan Manager
Comprehensive Planning Section, Planning And Zoning Department
REVIEWED BY:
DATE: I''//-/Y.
Mike Bosi,AICP, Director, Planning And Zoning Department
APPRO • BY:
DATE: Cc- 1 2,- 1 if
k "-salanguida, !-minis rato
Growth Management Division
PETITION NO.: CP-2013-10/ PL-2013-0001767
Staff Report for the August 21, 2014, CCPC Meeting.
NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the October 14, 2014, BCC Meeting.
CP-2013-10/PL20130001767
2013-10, Global Properties:Creating the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
Packet Page -132-
10/14/2014 9.A.
com'I s.f.comparison
s.f.-staff s.f.-petitioner difference
Existing Community Commercial-5 mile 859,358 807,449 51,909
Potential Community Commercial-5 mile 497,467 550,735 (53,268)
SUM 5 mile 1,356,825 1,358,184 (1,359)
Existing Community Commercial-10 mile 924,985 852,558 72,427
Potential Community Commercial-10 mile 347,500 327,000 20,500
SUM 10 mile 1,272,485 1,179,558 92,927
Existing Community Commercial-15 mile 422,773 336,564 86,209
Potential Community Commercial-15 mile 2,333,165 2,100,834 232,331
SUM 15 mile 2,755,938 2,437,398 318,540
SUM Marco I 110,532 I 110,596 1 (64)1
ISUM of Existing&Potential Community Commercial I 5,495,780 I 5,085,736 I 410,044 I
conclusion:
staff estimates a total of 410,044 s.f. more community commercial development than petitioner
\\e...,..o.....�,..,.\GMD-LDSwDES P..,,,,,.QS...sC.mo...,•=..1COMPP_ANN INS SMP DATA\C.,.. F,...Am.,..m.....SC'3C, ..&S_..S..P...,.,d20"3 3-O.o...\CP-2O3-1C.
..../A,.c.2D1A
Packet Page -133-
10/14/2014 9.A.
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED,
SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND
FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, BY ESTABLISHING THE
VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT IN THE URBAN MIXED USE
DISTRICT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ONLY, COMMERCIAL ONLY
OR MIXED USE PROJECT AT THE FOLLOWING DENSITY/INTENSITY:
UP TO 10 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR A
MAXIMUM OF 307 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, UP TO 250,000
SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES, A 150 ROOM HOTEL AT A
FLOOR AREA RATIO OF.60 AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AT A
FLOOR AREA RATIO OF .60. THE COMMERCIAL USES ALLOWED BY
RIGHT ARE ALL PERMITTED USES AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE
C-1 GENERAL OFFICE THROUGH C-3 COMMERCIAL GENERAL
ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE, WITH CONVERSIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF PROJECT IS
DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT; AND FURTHERMORE
RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF SOUTHWEST
BOULEVARD AND US 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST) IN SECTION 32,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CONSISTING OF 31 ±ACRES. [PL20130001767/CP-2013-10]
WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the
Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of
1985, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier
County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989;and
WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local
governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to
amend adopted comprehensive plans;and
WHEREAS, Petitioner, Robert J. Mulhere FAICP of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D.
Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester. PA on behalf of Global Properties,
LLC, has initiated this amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map an
Map Series; and
[14-CMF-00931/1 1 17300/1}34—Rev.9/16/14 1
Words underlined are additions; Words struek-thr-fatigl}are deletions
*** *** *** *** are a break in text
I
Packet Page -134-
10/14/2014 9.A.
WHEREAS, on August 21, 2014 and September 4, 2014, the Collier County Planning
Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to
the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said
amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and
WHEREAS, on October 14, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners, at a public
hearing, approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency
in accordance with Section 163.3184,F.S.;and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan
Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have
thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing,to Collier
County its comments within said thirty(30)days pursuant to Section 163.3184,F.S.; and
WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must
adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment
within one hundred and eighty(180)days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184,F.S.; and
WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted
Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan
Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3),F.S.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management
Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein, for the
purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies
thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment
prior to final adoption.
THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote this
day of ,2014.
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
Deputy Clerk TOM HENNING, Chairman
[14-CMP-0093 1/1 1 1 7300/1]34—Rev.9/16/14 2
Words underlined are additions; Words struck-t#retugh are deletions
*** *** *** ***are a break in text
Packet Page-135-
10/14/2014 9.A.
Approved as to form and legality:
Vi\\.4\
Heidi Ashton-Cicko'
Managing Assistant County Attorney
Attachment: Exhibit"A"—text and maps
CP\l 4-CMP-0093 I\2
[14-0\4P-00931/1117300'1j 34-Rev.9/16/14 3
Words underlined are additions: Words shalt-t#tr-euzA are deletions
*** *** *** *1* are a break in text
I
Packet Page -136-
10/14/2014 9.A.
PL20130001767 CP-2013-10
EXHIBIT"A"
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
[Page 10]
Policy 1.1:
The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts
for:
A. URBAN -MIXED USE DISTRICT
1. Urban Residential Subdistrict
2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict
3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict
4. Business Park Subdistrict
5. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict
6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict
7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict
8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict
9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict
10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict
11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict
12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict
13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict
14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict
15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict
16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict
17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
.*** .*** ***. **.* **** *.** **** *..* **** **** ****
[Page 26]
12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban - Mixed Use District, PUD
Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict, Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, Residential
Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Buckley Mixed
Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed
Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial
Infill Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict, Vincentian Mixed
Use Subdistrict; and, in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict,
Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict,
Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road Commercial Infill
Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston RoadNeterans Memorial Boulevard
Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict; Orange
Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle
Redevelopment Overlay; and, as allowed by certain FLUE policies.
1
Words underlined are added;words struck-through are deleted.
Row of asterisks (**** **** ****)denotes break in text.
Packet Page -137-
10/14/2014 9.A.
PL20130001767 CP-2013-10
[Page 46]
17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict
This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, is located on the south/west side of Tamiami
Trail East (US 41) and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this
Subdistrict is to allow for neighborhood, community, and regional commercial development; residential
development; and mixed use (commercial and residential) development.
The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development
in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and to provide employment opportunities for residents in the
surrounding area. In order to comply with Policy 1.10 of the Housing Element of the Growth
Management Plan, residential development shall be limited to market-rate units so as to avoid the
concentration of affordable housing in one location in the County. The property may be developed
entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses.
The development of this Subdistrict shall comply with the following restrictions, limitations and
standards:
a. Allowable uses: The maximum intensity of commercial uses shall be limited to those allowed in the
C-3 zoning district, both by right and by conditional use, as listed in the Collier County Land
Development Code in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict. Additionally, the
following uses are allowed:
1. Department store (5311),
2. Hotel (7011, hotel only),
3. Dental laboratories (8072),
4. Nursing and personal care facilities (8051),
5. General warehousing and storage (4225, indoor self-storage warehousing only), and
6. Automotive rental and leasing (7514-7515).
b. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards:
1. Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area
(GFA), and one hotel (maximum FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted
living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum
allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet.
2. Residential development shall be limited to a maximum density of 10 units per acre, calculated
on the gross acreage of the property exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of
307 multi-family dwelling units.
3. If the project is developed as mixed use (residential and commercial uses), the residential
density allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the
project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of
commercial uses, and a 150-room hotel not to exceed 0.6 FAR, and an Assisted Living Facility
at a 0.6 FAR. Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF,the maximum allowable commercial
GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet.
4. A stand-alone automobile service station (i.e. retail fuel sales in conjunction with a
convenience store) is prohibited: however, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery
store or membership warehouse type facility greater than 15,000 square feet of GFA are
allowed.
5. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on
a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse,
and tennis courts.
2
Words underlined are added;words&truck through are deleted.
Row of asterisks(**** `"* ****)denotes break in text.
Packet Page -138-
10/14/2014 9.A.
PL20130001767 CP-2013-10
c. Site Development:
1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development
SPUD). The rezone ordinance shall contain development and design standards to ensure
compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses, and shall include additional
restrictions and standards necessary to ensure that uses and hours of operation are
compatible with surrounding land uses.
2. The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be
submitted with the first Site Development Plan.
3. The unified planned development submitted at time of the first Site Development Plan will
reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and
cross-access agreements.
4. Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties, where feasible, and
between internal buildings.
5. At the time of Site Development Plan approval, the required on-site vegetation retention may
be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1(13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management
Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. At a minimum, 15 percent of the on-site
native vegetation must be retained on-site. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site
is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board
of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the Conservation Collier
Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required.
.*** **** .... **** **** *... ..** ..** ***. **** *.**
[Page 141]
Urban Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map
Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map
Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map
Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map
Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map
Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map
Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map
Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map
Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map
Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map
Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict
Livingston RoadNeteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map
Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map
Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map
Coastal High Hazard Area Map
Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map
Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map
3
Words underlined are added;words strusk-t#rough are deleted.
Row of asterisks(""** """" "")denotes break in text.
Packet Page -139-
PETITION PL201300017; P-2013-10 '
P 32 E i........,....,'.33,..! '
EX3H310 A*, 3 3, E 1
------,
R 25 E • R 26 E I-----A 27 E R 211E---- R 26 E
r uouloestuurfou
R 34 1
2012 -2025
--i—.,,..,....— St Tre.,'!............,
1111111 0.----
tz--...=‘:.-=,,....., 0 ebusalwAnow gelmon.noot :
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
... , ,,...
........,
1 "."":":::"""' :.
--.-1:
Coll..,County Florida
.7, oel..Oi TM,RUM OWEN.AT
ON Tit fLrflillF LAM IME MN MUD
■-• 'COWER OM.,RM.•0.01.11.11/RAL
M....SPAS011tf CrrIGYKIIM OVUM,KV
- -
C ii:or=prin4.1.," .
•-•
..,..",...--
muumuu.Ia.Eft mitmew 6.
1111
•4":.X.T..-V=,...' ........., a r.-1---=,:fr---- —
-*, f •IfIt.I.=74f,`"''"'
+
, 1..01,
4 5E1 E.E
-—— it`3•-,, :k*-E4.1;‘'llte - :
.",.7-7.----...---7..,:_:.„.....----...........-......... ---
N.‘ -
...,
7D , - - . - ...
CO
'''\‘'\ ,..-'...7"."',, :... 1.0.'". 1 as
.., „ ,r1,A, ■
• I •
,-,
.--,
l . ..
,--
1- -- 4 i -, `-J1="ri-i-....:::.t.,_ ,---7,C,
..,
0 iy, -- i, cf7.;:,..i.---
1- -=--- ' ,‘, .\,.‘ \ : ki!--i,..,- ----.--,;.!.,'• - :-.- 1
I
s- —_,-: . -- . ; -11.......=-- ..
-' 't•, s.V1 '.:4'''''':;+,'.: , ' 4:.12......7:1r.
-
SUBJECT 1,.:::' ..,,,, 7 ---.. .‘ -'- -77.,-----r: '.. -.71,
.(I`--- _ -7=---- _:-.--7-r-- ,... i "^'... "."7-^
SI T E cv,X,..) „.„, '...„.;,„,. -,--- 1 ",..... pgesErEv3 ...7, ..,;;;;"L'^•-.
CP-2013-10 ,f::.T-T/:.t.,,i....F:d .i.r. ..„ 7. , -...,. ,:l, „:,,w,
\-i ---N 1*".— 'I'''. ',IT:a', ";
,..
,_ ...r....„7.7... ...
,...,
■ ' ,, Ac.n.0=4,,k.4 , , vrt4.,.,..< ,,.......... -----''..--1 -----------___ ________ '', ;...1 .I=•
-
,....
t 0
,b.
csD
'J P 2f. E __ _Rif, E F 27 E R 2t E R 29 E A 32 E F 3, E A 32 E R 33 E_ 34 E ___
>
10/14/2014 9.A.
EXHIBIT A PETITION PL20130001767 I CP-2013-10
O VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT
• COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
0% * 4 E /PA
4■•• 4 .--,-..=
� , 1 ( `J
al 1 LI iLr ,ip. .0
4,0-■
.. 4,,,,,$.1.1, 4,
0 4,- s
, # 4
• , ,4,
4.72;#
, 410,-
40 ����� ��111111/1/
4' liiiiiiiii
4111111111111111111
s
,4 Pp
70
LEGEND
SCALE `\ SUBDISTRICT
{ I
PREPARED B'Y: /CA0 MAKING SECTICN 0 1000 FT. 2000 FT.
GROWN MANAOEYENT DIV190N PLANING/PLANG AND REO.LATON
DA1E: 7/2014 FILE CP-2013-10ADNG ,
Packet Page -141-
. w 10/14/2014 9.A.
PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing
on Tuesday,October 14,2014,in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor,Collier County
Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,Florida.The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider:
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT
TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN,ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,
4 SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP
AND MAP SERIES, BY ESTABLISHING THE VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT IN THE
URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ONLY COMMERCIAL ONLY OR
MIXED USE PROJECT AT THE FOLLOWING DENSITY/INTENSITY: UP TO 10 RESIDENTIAL
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR A MAXIMUM OF 307 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS,UP
TO 250,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES,A 150 ROOM HOTEL AT A FLOOR AREA
RATIO OF.60 AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF.60. THE
COMMERCIAL USES ALLOWED BY RIGHT ARE ALL PERMITTED USES AND CONDITIONAL
USES IN THE C-1 GENERAL OFFICE THROUGH C-3 COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING
DISTRICTS IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WITH CONVERSIONS
AND LIMITATIONS IF PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT; AND
FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE
CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND US 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST) IN SECTION 32,
N TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 31 t
0 ACRES. [PL20130001767/CP-2013-10]
a
L�s, .A r :.w.m;.-r.:y
Q `.�\� NAPS MANOR Lo,
y
ro 'i
a
P) ,s i I I
=` 1
rp
gyp tC^T
ID
m JLOCA.TIC)N
! L_________I
, ili„,
CD
NJ t i ;ry f;
K �I
d WENT`NORTN ESTATES /,..
■r
M
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Resolution will be
> made available for inspection at the Planning &Zoning Department, Comprehensive Planning Section,
m
I— 2800 N.Horseshoe Dr.,Naples,FL.,between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.,Monday through Friday.
gym,, Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,Fourth
o
I Floor,Suite 401,Colter County Government Center,East Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.
n E Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the Planning & Zoning Department,
1 Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to
{ Tuesday,October 14,2014,will be read and considered at the public hearing,
t
m f If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners
u) , with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,
and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which
record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
1 If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,
6 you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County
1 Facilities Management Department,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,
(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired
i are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office.
F
a BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS-COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA
f. TOM HENNING-CHAIRMAN
4 DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK-By: Martha Vergara-Deputy Clerk(SEAL)
115 22113n3 `u 'n1 24,2c.114 ,
I. . i
Packet Page -142-
i