Agenda 07/08/2014 Item #17D7/8/2014 17.D.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to consider approving Staff - Proposed 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report -
Based Amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89 -05, as
Amended, to Fix Glitches Related to Changes in 2011 EAR -Based Amendments and Revise for
Internal Consistency, for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for
review and Comments response (Transmittal Hearing).
OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to review several individual
staff - initiated amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) and consider
approving said amendments for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity
(DEO).
CONSIDERATIONS:
• Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government's adopted
Growth Management Plan.
• The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the "local planning agency"
under Chapter 163.3174, F.S., held their Transmittal hearing for petition
PL20130001109 /CPSP- 2013 -6 on May 15, 2014.
• This is the Transmittal hearing for these out of Cycle, staff - proposed amendments to the
Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Capital Improvement Element, Future Land
Use Element, Recreation and Open Space Element, Stormwater Management Sub - Element of
the Public Facilities Element, and the Transportation Element of the Growth Management
Plan.
The amendments that are the subject of this hearing are limited in scope primarily to those
directed by the Board following the adoption of 2011 EAR -based GMP amendments. Though
not necessarily recommended by specific reference in the EAR, these general updating and
"housecleaning" amendments seek to add clarity, correct text errors or omissions, provide
harmony and internal consistency, and so forth. Further explanation and staff analysis is provided
in the CCPC Staff Report.
FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts to Collier County as a result of these GMP
amendments. However, the costs associated with legal advertising /public notice for the public
hearings are borne by the County.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of these proposed amendments by the
Board for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity will commence the
Department's thirty -day (30) review process and ultimately return these amendments to the
Planning Commission and the Board for final Adoption hearings to be held later in 2014.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality. A majority vote
of the Board is needed for transmittal to DEO. [HFAC]
STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION (CCPC: That the CCPC forward petition PL20130001109 /CPSP- 2013 -6 to the
Packet Page -2592-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Board with a recommendation to adopt. The staff recommendation to the Board is the same - to
adopt.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPQ RECOMMENDATION: The
CCPC forwarded petition PL20130001109 /CPSP- 2013 -6 to the Board with a recommendation to
approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (vote: 510). There
were no public speakers to this item.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OARD : That the Board of County Commissioners (Board) approves for transmittal the
amendments to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO).
Prepared by: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, David Weeks, AICP, GMP Manager,
Comprehensive Planning Section, Planning and Zoning Department, Growth Management
Division/Planning and Regulation
Attachments: 1) CPSP - 2013 -6 CCPC Staff Report; 2) CPSP- 2013 -6 Resolution with Exhibit "A"
text.
Packet Page -2593-
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 17.17.D.
7/8/2014 17.D.
Item Summary: Recommendation to consider approving Staff - Proposed 2011 Evaluation
and Appraisal Report-Based Amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan,
Ordinance 89 -05, as Amended, to Fix Glitches Related to Changes in 2011 EAR -Based
Amendments and Revise for Internal Consistency, for Transmittal to the Florida Department of
Economic Opportunity for review and Comments response (Transmittal Hearing).
Meeting Date: 7/8/2014
Prepared By
Name: KendallMarcia
Title: Planner, Senior, Comprehensive Planning
6/9/2014 2:37:53 PM
Approved By
Name: WeeksDavid
Title: Manager - Planning, Comprehensive Planning
Date: 6/11/2014 3:53:27 PM
Name: BosiMichael
Title: Director - Planning and Zoning, Comprehensive Planning
Date: 6/12/2014 8:44:06 AM
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, Community Development & Environmental Services
Date: 6/13/2014 11:28:45 AM
Name: MarcellaJeanne
Title: Executive Secretary, Transportation Planning
Date: 6/13/2014 4:06:30 PM
Name: AshtonHeidi
Title: Managing Assistant County Attorney, CAO Land Use/Transportation
Date: 6/25/2014 10:44:43 AM
Name: FirmEd
Packet Page -2594-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Title: Management/Budget Analyst, Senior, Transportation Engineering & Construction Management
Date: 6/25/2014 12:04:00 PM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 6/26/2014 4:56:31 PM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Director -Corp Financial and Mngmt Svs, Office of Management & Budget
Date: 6/27/2014 11:03:27 AM
Name: OchsLeo
Title: County Manager, County Managers Office
Date: 6/30/2014 8:36:19 PM
Packet Page -2595-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Agenda Item 9H
s s
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION /PLANNING AND REGULATION, LAND
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION
HEARING DATE: MAY 15, 2014
RE: PETITION NO. PL20130001109 /CPSP- 2013 -6, STAFF - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT, CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE
MAP SERIES, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT, STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT SUB - ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT, AND THE
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
[TRANSMITTAL HEARING]
REQUESTED ACTION and STAFF ANALYSIS:
This proposal consists of several individual staff- initiated amendments, as authorized or directed by
the Board of County Commissioners. Most of the amendments seek to add clarity, correct text and
map errors or omissions, and provide harmony and internal consistency. Each amendment is
identified below, followed by brief explanation /analysis. The proposed amendments themselves make
up the Exhibit "A" accompanying the Transmittal Resolution.
Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME):
• Revise Statutory cites in INTRODUCTION, as amended earlier by Evaluation and Appraisal
Report (EAR) -based Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendments elsewhere.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — the Objective 2.1 placeholder, "or its successor"
appears in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR -based GMPAs, then awaiting adoption of
specific document.
• Deleting possessive modifier in Goal 6, for proper language of a GMP Goal.
• Change year from "2012" to "2013" in Policy 6.1.1.
• Remove the term "District" in this context in Policy 6.2.3.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — updating the reference to a State of Florida
document to replace the Policy 6.5.2 placeholder text that was then awaiting adoption of
specific document.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Goal 8 and Objective 8.1 for proper
language of a GMP Goal and Objective; these were overlooked and did not specifically appear
in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR -based GMPAs.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Objective 9.3 and Policy 9.3.1 for proper
language of a GMP Goal and Objective; these were overlooked and did not specifically appear
in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR -based GMPAs.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Goal 11 and Objective 11.1 for proper
language of a GMP Goal and Objective; these were overlooked and did not specifically appear
in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR -based GMPAs.
• Revise department names in Policy 12.1.6.
—1—
Packet Page -2596-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Agenda Item 9H
• Renumber policy with the number "12.1.16" to "12.1.15 ".
• Revise department name in Policy 12.2.5.
• Revise department / director name in Policy 12.3.3.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Objective 12.4 for proper language of a
GMP Objective, and revise department name in Objective 12.4 and Policy 12.4.1.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Goal 13 and Objective 13.1 for proper
language of a GMP Goal and Objective; these were overlooked and did not specifically appear
in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR -based GMPAs.
Capital Improvement Element (CIE):
• Revise Statutory cite in INTRODUCTION, as amended earlier by EAR -based GMPAs
elsewhere.
• Make singular the "Goals" in heading II.
• Revise to include introductory statement in Policy 1.5.H, which did not get moved with other
EAR -based amendments.
• Update references to School District documents in "Public School Facilities Projects" section of
the Schedule of Capital Improvements.
• Delete entry no. 4, under Section V, referring to a Semi - annual Report that is no longer
required. Re- number subsequent entries 5-7 to account for this deletion.
• Update language in present entry 7 under Section V referencing Evaluation and Appraisal
Reports; delete 7.B. to correlate with earlier deletion pertaining to a Semi - annual Report that is
no longer required, and re -letter present 7.C; and, add new 7.0 to reflect statutory changes in
2011.
• Revise throughout to correctly use the "US 41 "highway designation that officially, has no
periods, as with "U.S. 41" and no hyphenation, as with "US -41 ". Change all US 41 entries —
and other US highways — to be consistent.
Future Land Use Element (FLUE):
• Update reference to Florida Planning law in the UNDERLYING CONCEPTS, "Coordination of
Land Use and Public Facilities" section.
• De- capitalize a common noun in Policy 2.2.
• Replace the informal "#" with the formal "No." for internal consistency in Policy 4.6 and
throughout. Note: the strike through of the number symbol - # - may not be apparent.
• Revise second paragraph under the "Urban Mixed Use District" section to delete a portion of
one sentence for clarity — many years ago an amendment was adopted in which words were
missing resulting in a nonsensical sentence; and, to revise another sentence for proper
sentence structure.
• Revise to remove the seldom found " :" (colon) for internal consistency from "Urban Residential
Subdistrict:" and other applicable subdistrict headings where found.
• Remove a repeated phrase Sending Lands subsection 9.d.
• Revise to remove the seldom found " *" (asterisk) for internal consistency from North Belle
Meade Overlay, In General, Planning Considerations' subsections and other applicable
provisions where found. Note: the strike through of an asterisk -- - may actually appear to be
an underline.
• Revise the acronym -only heading for internal consistency from the "NRPA" subsection.
• Revise Statutory cite in RLSA Policies1.2, 4.2 and 4.7, as amended earlier in RLSA Policies
1.16 and 4.6 by EAR -based GMPAs and other applicable provisions where found.
• Revise throughout to correctly use the "US 41 "highway designation that officially, has no
periods, as with "U.S. 41" and no hyphenation, as with "US -41 ". Change all US 41 entries —
and other US highways — to be consistent.
—2—
Packet Page -2597-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Agenda Item 9H
Future Land Use Map Series (FLUM):
• Add new Gordon River Greenway Conservation designation inset map and add inset map title
to FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES listing.
Recreation and Open Space Element (ROSE):
• Revise to number headings; delete element name sub - heading.
• Amend Policy 1.1.1 to replace Policy 1.5; subsection "G "" with Policy "1.5.G" for internal
consistency.
• Delete paragraph "C" under Policy 1.1.1. Paragraphs "A" and "B" in Policy 1.1.1 were correctly
deleted from the ROSE by Ordinance 13 -11 (EAR -based amendment) and the content of
Paragraphs A and B were correctly added to the CIE by Ordinance 13 -03 (EAR -based
amendment). The content of Paragraph "C" was deleted from the CIE prior to 2008, but the
glitch occurred when the duplicative Paragraph C in the ROSE was not.
• Revise Goal 2 to be consistent with EAR -based re- formatting of goals, objectives and policies,
throughout.
Stormwater Management Sub - Element:
• Revise to match earlier Sub - Element renaming as amended elsewhere in the
INTRODUCTION for internal consistency, and to use upper case more similar to prevailing
style found where a specific "Element" or "Sub - Element" is being referenced — making these
proper nouns — and other applicable provisions where found.
• Revise to number headings; Make singular the "Goals" in heading 11.
• Amend Policy 2.1 to replace Policy "1.5; subsection "C "" with Policy "1.5.C" for internal
consistency.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — updating the reference to a State of Florida
document to replace the Policy 6.2 placeholder text that was then awaiting adoption of specific
document. Repeated in Policy 6.3 item 2.
• The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — completing the incomplete list of basins and their
respective discharge rates in Policy 6.3.
Transportation Element (TE):
• Revise to de- pluralize the word "resembles" in the FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS, "Traffic
Circulation Constraints" section.
• Amend Policy 1.3 to replace Policy 1.5; subsection "A "" with Policy "1,.5.A" for internal
consistency.
• Amend Policy 1.4 to replace Policy 1.5; subsection "B "" with Policy "1.5.13" for internal
consistency.
• Re -insert the word "and" between `Statutes' and 'the' in Policy 5.4, which was unintentionally
deleted by Ord. 13-4 (EAR -based GMPAs).
• Insert parenthetical number entries where only written numbers appear, so as to add clarity in
Policies 5.5 and 5.6.
• Revise Policy 5.6 to correct the reference to "Department" affected by past renaming as part of
an organizational change.
• Insert thoroughfare designation entries to add clarity in Policy 6.5 — and other instances where
found.
• Revise Policy 6.5 to add complete road names.
• Revise to correctly use the "US 41 "highway designation that officially, has no periods, as with
"U.S. 41" and no hyphenation, as with "US -41 ". Change all US 41 entries — and other US
highways — to be consistent in Policies 5.4, 5.5, 6.5 and in the List of tables /Maps /Figures (un-
adopted).
—3—
Packet Page -2598-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Agenda Item 9H
ADDITIONAL STAFF ACTION and ANALYSES:
Approval of amendments to the Growth Management Plan Element is intended to confer the Board's
consent to make similar and related changes to un- adopted portions of the document. The above
Elements of the GMP have a number of these in common, in particular: to update and make current
the Tables of Contents, along with corresponding titles, headings and other entries — inside and
between Elements — to maximize internal consistency.
Environmental Impacts:
The above amendments are primarily text and/or map corrections and clarifications, with no
amendments resulting in a new change to the future land use designation. Accordingly, these
amendments do not intensify the allowable uses or densities, and there are no new environmental
impacts being authorized by any of these amendments.
Public Facilities Impacts:
Due to the nature of most of these amendments, there are no new impacts upon public facilities being
authorized.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
This staff report has been approved as to form and legality by the Office of the County Attorney.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CPSP- 2013 -6 to the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
—4—
Packet Page -2599-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Agenda Item 9.
PREPARED BY:
L' Dbv DATE:
CORBY SCHMI T, AICP, PRI C PAL PLANNER
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
REVIEWED BY:
DATE:
DAVID WEEKS, AICP, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN MANAGER
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
REVIEWED BY-
`_ _ DATE:I
MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
APPROVE -D,BY:
1
t
DATE:
'WICK C ` A0ANG A, AD OR
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
PETITION NOs. PL20130001109 / CPSP- 2013 -6
Staff Report for the May 15, 2014, CCPC Meeting.
NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the July 8, 2014, BCC Meeting.
G:ICOES Planning Service6Comprehensive=MP PLANNING GMP DATA1Comp Plan Amendments12013 GMPAs Outside of CycIe1CPSP- 2013 -6 First Set of Batch
Amendments113 -6 Transmittal Stff Rprt_4 -16 final.docx
—5—
Packet Page -2600-
7/8/2014 17.D.
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PROPOSING 2011 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
BASED AMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89 -05, AS AMENDED, TO FIX
GLITCHES RELATED TO CHANGES IN THE 2011 EAR -BASED
AMENDMENTS AND TO REVISE FORMAT, STRUCTURE AND
LANGUAGE FOR INTERNAL CONSISTENCY SPECIFICALLY
AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT;
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT; CONSERVATION AND COASTAL
MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
ELEMENT; THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE
LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; THE STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT (DRAINAGE) SUB - ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC
FACILITIES ELEMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING
TRANSMITTAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY.
(PL20130001109 /CPSP- 2013 -61
WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seg., Florida Statutes, the
Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was
required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS. the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier
County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes (2010), Collier
County adopted its Evaluation and Appraisal Report ( "EAR ") of the Growth Management Plan
on January 31, 2011 by Resolution No. 2011-24; and
WHEREAS, the EAR identified provisions of the Growth Management Plan that need to
be amended; and
WHEREAS, Collier County has prepared EAR -based plan amendments to address
glitches related to 2011 EAR -based amendments to the follovN°ing elements of its Growth
Management Plan:
Capital Improvement Element;
Transportation Element;
Conservation and Coastal Management Element;
Recreation and Open Space Element;
Future Land Use Element;
Stormwater Management (Drainage) Sub- Element;
EAR -based GMPA Page] of 3
Rev. 4116/14
Words underlined are additions; Words s#F06k thFOt gh are deletions
Packet Page -2601-
7/8/2014 17.D.
and
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2014, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the
proposed EAR-based amendments to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority
granted to it by Section 163,3174, Florida Statutes, and recommended approval of said
amendments to the Board of County Commissioners; and
WHEREAS, on July 8. 2014, the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing
approved the transmittal of the proposed EAR-based amendments to the Growth Management
Plan to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed EAR-based Growth Management
Plan Amendments, the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) has sixty (60 ' ) days to
review the proposed EAR-based amendments and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier
County, its comments along with any objections and any recommendations for modification,
within said sixty (60) days pursuant to Section 163.3184(4), Florida Statutes-, and
WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO, must
adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendments
within one - hundred- eighty (180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184(4), Florida
Statutes; and
WHEREAS, after the DEO makes a determination of completeness of the adopted EAR-
based Growth Management Plan Amendments, the DEO has forty-five (45) days to review and
determine if the Plan Amendments are in compliance with the Community Planning Act of 2011,
pursuant to Section 16' )3184(4). Florida Statutes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed EAR-Based Growth
Management Plan Amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference
herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity thereby
initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendments, prior to
final adoption and State determination of compliance with the Community Planning Act of 2011,
T141S RESOLUTION adopted after motion, second and majority vote this _ day of
,2014.
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA
BY:
Deputy Clerk TOM HENNING, Chairman
EAR-based GMPA Page 2 of 3
Rev. 4f 16/ 14
Words underlined are additions; Words stmek 4hr-eugh are deletions
Packet Page -2602-
Approved as to form and legality:
VA ( `,�l
Ileidi Ashton- Ciclto -i
Managing Assistant County Attorney
Attachment: Exhibit A - Text and Maps
14 -CMP- 00913{ 14
EAR -based GMPA
Rev. 4/16/14
Words underlined are additions; Words stf:uelr through are deletions
Packet Page -2603-
Page 3 of 3
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments
CCPC Transmittal Draft
EXHIBIT "A"
7/8/2014 17.D.
4116114
P L20130001109/C PS P- 2013 -6
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (CCME)
t. INTRODUCTION [Revised text, page 1]
Subsection 163.3177 {5" &(d), Florida Statutes requires all local governments within the State of
Florida to have, as part of their respective Local Government Comprehensive Plans, an Element,
dealing with "the conservation, use, and protection of natural resources in the area, including air,
water, water recharge areas, wetlands, water wells, estuarine marshes, soils, beaches, shores, flood
plains, rivers, bays, lakes, harbors, forests, fisheries and wildlife, marine habitat, minerals, and other
natural and environmental resources. including factors that affect energy conservation."
This Subsection also
requires local Conservation Elements to consider the applicable Water Management District water
supply plans or water management plans. More specifically, the Conservation Element must "assess
their "current;as- ,as-as and projected, water needs and sources for at least a 10 -year period."
In addition to the Conservation Element, Subsection 163.3177 (5)(g) LQJ i, Florida Statutes, also
requires certain designated local governments (including Collier County) to have an element of the
local comprehensive plan dealing with coastal management. This Coastal Management Element
must "set forth the policies that shall guide the local government's decisions and program
implementation with respect to the following objectives:"
+ *+ + ++ + ++ + ++ + ++ text break +++ + ++ + ++ + ++ * ++
OBJECTIVE 2.1: [Revised text, page 6]
Prepare Watershed Management Plans, which contain appropriate mechanisms to protect the
County's estuarine and wetland systems. Until the Watershed Management Plans are completed, the
County shall apply the following as interim standards for development:
a. All new development and re- development projects shall meet 150% of the water quality
volumetric requirements of the
State of Florida's
Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume 1 (2013), or its successor, in
effect at the time of project approval, and the retention and detention requirements, and the
allowable off -site discharge rates required by Stormwater Management Sub - Element Policy
6.2 and 6.3, respectively;
text break
GOAL 6: [Revised text, page 16]
TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE
VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT.
+* * ** +++ + ++ + ++ text break + ++ * +* + + + ++ * **
Policy 6.1.1: [Revised text, page 16]
For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area,
and Agricultural /Rural Mixed Use District, Rural - industrial District and Rural - Settlement Area District
as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the
following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria, unless the
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words 6t%Gk thFough are deleted.
Packet Page -2604-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116114
development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) where the ACSC standards
referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply. Notwithstanding the ACSC requirements, this
pPolicy shall apply to all non - agricultural development except for single - family dwelling units situated
on individual parcels that are not located within a watershed management conservation area identified
in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this
Element. For properties not previously within the Coastal High Hazard Area but now within the
Coastal High Hazard Area due to adoption of a revised Coastal High Hazard Area boundary in 24-2
2013, the native vegetation preservation and retention standards of the Non - Coastal High Hazard
Area shall continue to apply. (Reference the Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map in the
Future Land Use Element.)
text break
Policy 6.2.3: (Repositioned parenthetical and revised text, page 27)
Collier County shall implement a comprehensive process to ensure wetlands and the natural functions
of wetlands are protected and conserved... The County shall direct impacts away from such wetlands.
*« « «« « «# « «« « «« text break « «« * «* « ** « «« «►«
(2) Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) Overlay
Best available data indicates that 74% of the County's wetlands are within the Big Cypress Area of
Critical State Concem Overlay. The land development regulations contained in the ACSC Overlay
DistFiGt, as depicted on the Countywide Future Land Use Map, provide standards that facilitate the
goal of directing higher intensity land uses away from wetland systems. The development standards
for the ACSC Overlay (Reference FLUE Land Use Designation Section V) specify that site alterations
shall be limited to 10% of the total site. The majority of the land contained within the ACSC is also
within the Conservation Designation and thus is subject to the land use limitations of that Land Use
Designation.
(3) Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs)
Major wetland systems and regional flow -ways were used as criteria to establish the NRPA Overlay
Distfist as shown on the Future Land Use Map, and as discussed in FLUE Land Use Designation,
Section V.C. These areas include high functioning wetland systems and, although portions of the
NRPA Overlay include lands within the Conservation Designation, represent approximately 12% of the
County's wetlands, which are not located in Conservation Lands. Based on the relatively high
concentration of wetlands within NRPA designated lands, incompatible land uses shall be directed
away from these areas. Allowable land uses within NRPAs are also subject to native vegetation
retention and preservation standards of 90 %.
* «« « *« « «« « «« « «« text break
Policy 6.5.2: [Revised text, page 35]
The following criteria shall apply to development contiguous to natural reservations in order to reduce
negative impacts to the natural reservations:
text break
(3) Within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, stormwater management systems discharging
directly to the natural reservation shall meet the Outstanding Florida Water criteria of one -half
inch of dry retention or retention pretreatment as specified in Section 5.22(b), of the Sys
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words struck fteug# are deleted. 2
Packet Page -2605-
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments
CCPC Transmittal Draft
7/8/2014 17.D.
4/16114
WateF Management DistriGt, August 2000- State of Florida's Environmental Resource Permit
Applicant's Handbook Volume 1 (2013), or its successor.
(4) Proposed development shall demonstrate that ground water table drawdowns or diversions
will not adversely impact the natural reservation. Detention and control elevations shall be set
to protect the natural reservation and be consistent with surrounding land and project control
elevations and water tables. In order to meet these requirements, projects shall be designed
in accordance with Sections 4.2.2.4, 6.11 and 6.12 of the State of
Florida's Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume 1 (2013) or its
successor,
www www www www w ** text break www www www www www
GOAL 8: [Revised text, page 41)
THE COUNTY SHALL TO MAINTAIN COLLIER COUNTY'S EXISTING AIR QUALITY.
OBJECTIVE 8.1: [Revised text, page 41 ]
sComply with all applicable federal and State air quality standards.
www w* www www www text break * ** *ww www www www
OBJECTIVE 9.3: [Revised text, page 42)
eContinue to hold 46 hazardous waste collection
days at least once per year.
Policy 9.3.1: [Revised text, page 42]
The l }Hazardous waste collection days shall target residential households but also allow small
businesses to participate to some extent.
www www www www www text break www www www www w *w
GOAL 11: [Revised text, page 50]
THE COUNTY S14ALL TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROTECTION, RESERVATION, AND SENSITIVE
RE -USE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES.
OBJECTIVE 11.1:
To p rotect historic and archaeological resources in Collier County.
www www www www www text break www www
[Revised text, page 501
www www www
Policy 12.1.6: [Revised text, page 52]
The Directors of the Engineering Services Department/Transportation Planning Section and Bureau of
Emergency Services Management Departments will review, at least annually, review evacuation route
road improvement needs to ensure that necessary improvements are reflected within Table A, the
Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, as contained within the Capital Improvement Element of
this Growth Management Plan.
www www www www www text break www www www www www
Policy 12.1.14: [Revised text, page 53]
All new nursing homes and assisted living facilities that are licensed shall have a core area to shelter
residents and staff on site. The core area will be constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design
Criteria that is are required for new public schools and public community colleges and universities
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words strusk - thmug# are deleted. 3
Packet Page -2606-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
( "State Requirements for Educational Facilities," 2007). Additionally, this area shall be capable of
ventilation or air conditioning provided by back -up generator for a period of no less than 72 hours.
Policy 12.1.4615: [Revised text, page 54]
The County will coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation on its plans to one -way
evacuation routes on State maintained roads that are primary evacuation routes for vulnerable
populations.
text break
Policy 12.2.5: [Revised text, page 55]
The County shall consider the Coastal High Hazard Area as a geographical area lying below the
elevation of the Category 1 storm surge line as presently defined in the 2011 Southwest Florida
Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study, or subsequently authorized storm surge or
evacuation planning studies coordinated by the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services
Management Depaintment and approved by the Board of County Commissioners.
text break
Policy 12.3.3: [Revised text, page 55]
The Recovery Task Force shall include the Sheriff, the Growth Management Division Administrator,
the Planning and Zoning Director, the Bureau of Emergency Services
Director and other members as directed by the Board of County Commissioners, such as
representatives from municipalities within the County that have received damage from a storm.
text break
OBJECTIVE 12.4: [Revised text, page 56]
The - Osu;;ty shall mMake every reasonable effort to meet the emergency preparedness requirements
of Persons with Special Needs such as the elderly, handicapped, the infirmed and those requiring
transportation from a threatened area. In the event of a countywide emergency, such as a hurricane
or other large -scale disaster, the County Bureau of Emergency Services MaAagEmeat Department in
coordination with the County Health Department and other officials shall open and operate one or
more refuges for persons listed on the County's Special Needs Registry and their caregivers. Medical
and support equipment at such refuges will include, but not necessarily be limited to, respirators,
oxygen tanks, first aid equipment, disaster cots and blankets, and defibrillators.
Policy 12.4.1: [Revised text, page 56]
All new hospitals, nursing homes, and adult congregate living facilities shall prepare an emergency
preparedness plan for approval by the Bureau of Emergency Services Management Department prior
to receiving a final development order.
* ** # «* « «,. * ** •*'* text break *�* •,•� « *wr
GOAL 13: [Revised text, page 56]
THE GQ NPl4 SHALL TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DUPLICATION OF EXISTING REGULATORY
PROGRAMS.
OBJECTIVE 13.1: [Revised text, page 57]
TG eEstablish, prior to the adoption of any land development regulation to implement this Element,
including but not limited to NRPA management guidelines and watershed management plans, a
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words SWGk !l # are deleted. 4
Packet Page -2607-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116/14
program to review such regulations and identify existing regulatory programs exercised by regional,
State, or Federal agencies with jurisdiction over the activities sought to be regulated.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE)
INTRODUCTION [Revised parenthetical citation, page 1]
text break
One of the specific requirements of the legislation states that the public facilities that are contained in
the CIE must be based on "standards to ensure the availability of public facilities and the adequacy of
those facilities to meet established acceptable levels of service." The statute defines the phrase "level
of service" as "...an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by ... a facility based on and
related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity per
unit of demand for each public facility." (Section
163.3164(28), Florida Statutes).
« «« « «« « «« « *« « ** text break « «« « *« ««« * «« « «*
Il. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES [Revised parenthetical citation, page 2]
text break
Policy 1.5: [Revised text, page 7]
The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows:
text break « «« « «* # «« « «« « ««
C. County Stormwater Management Systems:
text break « «« « «« « «« « «« « ««
LEVELS OF SERVICE ATTAINED BY BASINS
text break
BASIN
SOUTHERN COASTAL BASIN
WS 44 US 41 Outfall Swale No. 1 Basin
US 41 US 41 Outfall Swale No. 2 Basin
Seminole Park Outlet Basin
LEVEL OF SERVICE
text break « «« « «« * «« « «« « ««
H. Public School Facilities:
Level of Service (LOS) standards for CSAs shall be based upon permanent FISH capacity:
DRAFT Words underlined are added, words st€uslf -tom are deleted. 5
Packet Page -2608-
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments
1. Elementary schools
2. Middle schools
3. High schools
CCPC Transmittal Draft
7/8/2014 17.D.
4/16/14
= 95 percent (0.95) of CSA Enrollment / FISH Capacity
= 95 percent (0.95) of CSA Enrollment / FISH Capacity
= 100 percent (1.00) of CSA Enrollment/ FISH Capacity
text break
Collier County Schedule of Capital Improvements [Revised text, page 23]
Public School Facilities Projects
For the purpose of school concurrency, and in accordance with Policy 4.2, the County hereby
incorporates, by reference, the School District's Capital Improvement Plan FY 43--32 14 — 33,
approved on May 8, 284-2 May 14, 2013; and, the District Facilities Work Program FY 43 ---1714—
18, adopted by the School Board on SepteRbeF 42, 2042 September 10, 2013 is hereby incorporated
as data and analysis.
text break
V. PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION [Revised text, page 26]
Through continued implementation of adopted land development regulations the following programs
have been implemented to ensure that the goals, objectives and policies established in this Capital
Improvement Element will be achieved or exceeded.
** wtnr t r **• * ** text break
! d =--.
6 4. Update of Capital Improvement Element [Renumbered text, page 26]
The monitoring of, and adjustment to, this Capital Improvement dement is an ongoing process
necessitated by changing conditions. Beginning no later than December of each year, the Element
will be updated in conjunction with the County's budget process, and the release of the official BEBR
population estimates and projections. The update will include.
text break ** * ** * **
8 S. Concurrency Management System [Renumbered text, page 27]
text break
-7 6. ThiFd Evaluation and Appraisal Repo Reviews [Renumbered & revised text, page 28]
T-I}e ReqUiFed -this Evaluation and Appraisal Repent Reviews (EAR) will address the implementation
of the goals, objectives and policies of this Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring procedures
necessary to enable the completion of the th*,Fd each evaluation include:
A. Review of annual reports of the Concurrency Management System, as set forth in Section 6 5
above;
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stFuGk i#Fsugh are deleted. 6
Packet Page - 2609
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16114
G B. Review of annual updates of this Capital Improvement Element, including updated supporting
documents; and -
C. Review of State of Florida legislation concerning comprehensive planning and growth
management passed since the previous EAR to evaluate effects on Collier County planning efforts.
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE)
C. UNDERLYING CONCEPTS
text break
text break
[Revised text, page 4]
Coordination of Land Use and Public Facilities
At the heart of Florida's GFGMh Managemen Community Planning Act (Chapter 163, Florida Statutes)
is the requirement that adequate service by public facilities must be available at the time of demand
by new development. This requirement is achieved by spatial coordination of public facilities with land
uses through the Future Land Use Map; and temporal coordination through LOS standards. The LOS
standards are binding - no final local Development Order may be issued which is not consistent with
the Concurrency Management System. Binding LOS standards have been established for roads,
water supply, sewage treatment, water management, solid waste and parks. While the standards in
the Capital Improvement and Public Facility Elements serve to guide public provision of infrastructure,
within the context of the Future Land Use Element the standards serve to assure the availability of
adequate facilities, whether public or private.
text break
Policy 2.2: [Revised text, page 12]
Deficiencies or potential deficiencies that have been determined through the Annual Update and
Inventory Report on capital public facilities may include the following remedial actions, establish an
area of significant influence for roads, a TCEA, TCMA, add projects to the Capital Improvement
Element, enter into a binding commitment with a 9cleveloper to construct the needed facilities or defer
development until improvements can be made or the level of service is amended to ensure available
capacity.
* ** * ** * ** * ** ** text break
Policy 2.4: [Revised text, page 12]
Pursuant to the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in this Element,
development located within the South U-.,& US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA)
(See Map TR-4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to
the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures set forth in Policy 5.5 of the
Transportation Element.
Developments within the South U-S- US 41 TCEA that do not obtain certification pursuant to Policy
5.6 of the Transportation Element shall meet all concurrency requirements. Whether or not a
concurrency exception is requested, developments shall be subject to a concurrency review for the
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words struck thfough are deleted. 7
Packet Page -2610-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116114
purpose of reserving capacity for those trips associated with the development and maintaining
accurate counts of the remaining capacity on the roadway network.
text break
Policy 4.6: [Revised text, page 16]
Access Management Plan provisions have been developed for Mixed Use and Interchange Activity
Centers designated on the Future Land Use Map and these provisions have been incorporated into
the Collier County Land Development Code. The intent of the Access Management Plan provisions is
defined by the following guidelines and principles:
a. The number of ingress and egress points shall be minimized and shall be combined and
signalized to the maximum extent possible.
b. Spacing of access points shall meet, to the maximum extent possible, the standards set
forth in the Collier County Access Control Policy (Resolution # No. 01 -247, adopted June 26, 2001).
Policy 4.7: [Revised text, page 161
The Board of County Commissioners may consider whether to adopt redevelopment plans for existing
commercial and residential areas. Such plans may include alternative land uses, modifications to
development standards, and incentives that may be necessary to encourage redevelopment. Such
redevelopment plans may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless otherwise authorized by
the Board of County Commissioners. The Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan was
adopted by the Board on June 13, 2000; it encompasses the Bayshore Drive corridor and the triangle
area formed by US 41 East, Davis Boulevard and Airport- Pulling Road. The Immokalee
Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Board on June 13, 2000. Other specific areas that may be
considered by the Board of County Commissioners for redevelopment include, but are not necessarily
limited to:
a. Pine Ridge Road, between U-a- US 41 North and Goodlette -Frank Road;
b. U S:- US 41 North in Naples Paris; and,
c. Bonita Beach Road between Vanderbilt Drive and the west end of Little Hickory Shores #1
Subdivision.
* ** * ** * *« text break . * * *,t
A. Urban Mixed Use District [Revised text, page 27]
This District, which represents approximately 116,000 acres, is intended to accommodate a variety of
residential and non - residential land uses, including mixed -use developments such as Planned Unit
Developments. Certain industrial and commercial uses are also allowed subject to criteria.
Water- dependent
and water - related land uses are permitted within the coastal region of this District. Mixed -use sites of
water - dependent and water - related uses and other recreational uses may include water - related parks,
marinas (public or private), yacht clubs, and related accessory and recreational uses, such as boat
storage, launching facilities, fueling facilities, and restaurants. Any development that includes a
water - dependent and /or water - related land use shall be encouraged to the use of the Planned Unit
Development technique and other innovative approaches so as to conserve environmentally sensitive
areas features and to assure compatibility with surrounding land uses.
text break
1. Urban Residential Subdistrict: [Revised text, page 28]
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words s# uek thmugh are deleted.
Packet Page -2611-
8
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments
CCPC Transmittal Draft
7/8/2014 17.D.
4/16114
The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource
constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. This Subdistrict
comprises approximately 93,000 acres and 80% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Maximum eligible
residential density shall be determined through the Density Rating System but shall not exceed 16
dwelling units per acre except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the
Land Development Code.
2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict:
The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Urban Designated Area
and the Agricultural /Rural Area and comprises approximately 5,500 acres and 5% of the Urban Mixed
Use District. Residential land uses may be allowed at a maximum base density of 1.5 units per gross
acre, plus any density bonus that may be achieved via CCME Policy 6.2.5 (6) b.1., and either "a" or
"b" below:
* ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break
3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict:
text break
6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict:
« «« « «« « «« « «« * ««
« «* « ««
text break * «« « *«
[Revised text, page 30]
« «* « «« « ««
[Revised text, page 33]
« «« « «« « ««
10. Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict [Revised text, page 37]
The Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict consists of approximately 83 acres and is located east of
Collier Boulevard (S-R- SR 951) and south of 4-5- US 41 (Tamiami Trail, East). The intent of the
Subdistrict is primarily To provide for a mixture of regional commercial uses and residential
development; the regional commercial uses are intended to serve the South Naples and Royal
Fakapalm Planning Communities, and the Marco Island area. Conversely, the primary intent of the .
Subdistrict is not to provide for community and neighborhood commercial uses. The focus of the
residential component of the Subdistrict shall be the provision of affordable- workforce housing to
support the commercial uses within the Subdistrict, as well as in the South Naples and Royal
Fakapalm Planning Communities, and the Marco Island area. The entire Subdistrict shall be
developed under a unified plan; this unified plan must be in the form of a Planned Unit Development.
« «« « *« « «« * «« « «* text break « «* « *« « *« « «« « ««
Specific requirements and limitations for the Henderson Creek Mixed -Use Subdistrict as follows:
a. Access to the Subdistrict shall be provided from Collier Boulevard (SR 951) and U7ST US 41. A
loop road that is open to the public shall connect these access points.
« «« « « «« « «« « «* text break « «« « *« * «« « «« « ««
15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict [Revised text, page 43]
The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide primarily for neighborhood commercial development at a
scale not typically found in the Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict.
« «« « «« « «* * ** * «« text break « «« « «« « «« * «« « **
a. Parcel!
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words s#o&4hrouO are deleted. 9
Packet Page -2612-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
This parcel is located at the intersection of Livingston Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road. A maximum
of 100,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area for commercial uses may be allowed. Allowable
uses shall be the following, except as prohibited above: retail, personal service, restaurant, office, and
all other uses as allowed, whether by right or by conditional use, in the C -1 through C -3 zoning
districts as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as
amended, in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict (Ordinance No. 2005 -25 adopted on
June 7, 2005); other comparable and /or compatible land uses not found specifically in the C -1 through
C -3 zoning districts, limited to: general and medical offices, government offices, financial institutions,
personal and business services, limited indoor recreational uses, and limited retail uses; mixed -use
development (residential and commercial uses). The maximum floor area for any single commercial
user shall be 20,000 square feet, except for a grocery/supermarket, physical fitness facility,
craft/hobby store, home furniture /furnishing store, or department store use, which shall not exceed a
maximum of 50,000 square feet.
b. Parcel
This parcel is located approximately % mile east of Livingston Road and is adjacent to multifamily
residential uses. A maximum of 80,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area for commercial uses
may be allowed. Allowable uses shall be the following, except as prohibited above: General and
medical offices, community facilities, and business and personal services, all as allowed, whether by
right or by conditional use, in the C -1 through C -3 zoning districts as set forth in the Collier County
Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended, in effect as of the date of adoption of
this Subdistrict (Ordinance No. 2005 -25 adopted on June 7, 2005). The maximum floor area for any
single commercial user shall be 20,000 square feet.
text break
2. Density Bonuses [Revised text, page 48]
Consistency with the following characteristics may add to the base density. Density bonuses are
discretionary, not entitlements, and are dependent upon meeting the criteria for each bonus provision
and compatibility with surrounding properties, as well as the rezone criteria in the Land Development
Code.
*** - *ilk * ** i1rlr* 14x* text break
C. Affordable - Workforce Housing Bonus:
As used in this density bonus provision, the term "affordable" shall be as defined in Chapter 420.9071,
F. S. To encourage the provision of affordable - workforce housing within certain Districts and
Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to 8 residential units per gross acre may
be added to the base density if the project meets the requirements of the Affordable - workforce
Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code, Ordinance # No.
04-41, as amended, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004), and if the affordable -
workforce housing units are targeted for families earning no greater than 150 % of the median income
for Collier County. In the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, projects utilizing the Affordable- workforce
Housing Density Bonus must provide appropriate mitigation consistent with Objective 12.1 and
subsequent policies, as applicable, of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Also, for
those specific properties identified within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, this density bonus
is allowed but only to a maximum of 6 residential units per gross acre. Additionally, the Affordable -
workforce Housing Density Bonus may be utilized within the Agricultural /Rural designation, as
provided for in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, subject to the aforementioned Section
2.06.00 of the Land Development Code.
text break
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words straskthrough are deleted. 10
Packet Page -2613-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16114
4. Density Conditions: [Revised text, page 50]
The following density condition applies to all properties subject to the Density Rating System.
a. Maximum Density
The maximum allowed density shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per gross acre within the Urban
designated area, except when utilizing the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) provision contained
in Section 2.03.07 of the Land Development Code adopted by Ordinance # No. 04-41, as amended
on June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004.
* ** text break
1. Rural Commercial Subdistrict [Revised text, page 67]
Within the Agricultura[/Rural - Mixed Use District, commercial development, up to a maximum of 200
acres, may be allowed providing the following standards for intensity of use are met:
a. The project, or that portion of a larger project, that is devoted to commercial development, is 2.5
acres or less in size;
b. The project, or that portion of a larger project which is devoted to commercial development, is no
closer than 5 miles, measured by radial distance, from the nearest developed commercial area,
zoned commercial area or designated Mixed Use Activity Center, except that the southwest
quadrant at the intersection of US 41 and S7R- SR 29, is eligible for commercial zoning under this
provision;
* ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * **
[Revised text, page 80)
C) Sending Lands: Sending Lands are those lands that have the highest degree of environmental
value and sensitivity and generally include significant wetlands, uplands, and habitat for listed
species.
text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * **
9. Where residential density is transferred from Sending Lands, allowable uses shall be limited to the
following:
a) Agricultural uses consistent with Chapter 823.14(6) Florida Statutes (Florida Right to Farm
Act), including water management facilities, to the extent and intensity that such operations
exist at the date of any transfer of development rights.
b) Cattle grazing on unimproved pasture where no clearing is required;
c) Detached single - family dwelling units, including mobile homes where the Mobile Home Zoning
Overlay exists, at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 40 acres. In order to retain
these development rights after any transfer, up to one dwelling must be retained (not
transferred) per 40 acres.
d) One detached dwelling unit, including mobile homes where the Mobile Home Zoning Overlay
exists, per each preexisting lot or parcel of less than 40 acres. For the purpose of this
provision, a preexisting lot or parcel is one that was in existence on or before June 22, 1999
and is: 1) a lot or parcel which is part of a subdivision recorded in the
public records of Collier County, Florida; or 2) a lot or parcel which has limited fixed
boundaries, described by metes and bounds or other specific legal description, the description
of which has been recorded in the public records of Collier County Florida on or before June
22, 1999; or 3) a lot or parcel which has limited fixed boundaries, for which an agreement for
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words s#rYsk tl+g# are deleted. 11
Packet Page -2614-
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments
CCPC Transmittal Draft
7/8/2014 17.D.
4/16114
deed was executed prior to June 22, 1999. In order to retain these development rights after
any transfer, up to one dwelling must be retained (not transferred) per each lot or parcel.
B. North Belle Meade Overlay
1. IN GENERAL
text break
text break * **
text break *'
[Revised text, page 93]
*,t♦ wrx xw• w *•
Planning Considerations
a. Wildlife Crossing and Wildlife Corridor
* The County should support construction of a wildlife crossing under 1 -75 connecting the NBM
and South Belle Meade (SBM), and the creation of a wildlife corridor connecting the NBM with
the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge to the east.
b. Transportation
'- An existing access road (presently providing access to County water wells) along the northern
section lines of Sections 22, 23 and 24 of Range 27 East may be maintained and improved, and
an extension of Wilson Boulevard should be provided through Section 33, Range 27 East
comprising a collector or arterial road extending to the south to Interstate 75 via an interchange
or service road for residential development should it commence in Sections 21, 28 and 27, or in
the alternate a haul road along an extension of Wilson Boulevard to service earth mining
activities with a connection through Sections 32 and 31 to Landfill Road.
* Lands required for the extension of Wilson Boulevard will be dedicated to Collier County at the
time of rezoning. The right -of -way shall be a sufficient size to accommodate collector road
requirements should there be a demonstrated need.
Within one year of June 19, 2002, the alternative alignments for east -west roadway, connecting
County Road 951 to an extension of Wilson Boulevard, shall be evaluated and assessed for the
Board's consideration. The roadway's alignment shall be determined with public input and
taking into consideration the following, at a minimum:
1. Usefulness as a route for truck traffic generated from any earth mining operations in
NBM;
2. Usefulness as a link in the County's major roadway network;
3. Avoidance of residential neighborhoods, to the extent feasible and prudent;
4. Avoidance of environmentally sensitive wildlife habitat, wildlife corridors, or greenways,
to the extent feasible and prudent;
5. The costs of construction, including any related design, permitting, and mitigation costs;
and
6. The costs of acquiring necessary right -of -way.
Alignments considered for such east -west roadway shall include extension of the existing
Landfill Road, extension of the existing Keane and Brantley Roads, extension of the existing
Green Boulevard, and any other alignment deemed feasible and prudent. In consideration of
the recommended alignment, the Board shall consider the level of public benefit as provided in
subparagraph 2 above in determining the proportionate public /private funding in subparagraphs
5 and 6 above and the method and timing of any public resource allocation to the project.
- The western 1/4 of Sections 22 and 27 will be buffered from the NBM NRPA to the east by a
buffer preservation that includes all of the eastern '/z of the western 1/4 of Sections 22 and 27,
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stFuGk thmugh are deleted. 12
Packet Page -2615-
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments
CCPC Transmittal Draft
7/8/2014 17.D.
4116114
which would consist of lake excavation areas between the Wilson Boulevard extension road
right -of -way and the NRPA.
Other than the new and improved Wilson Boulevard extension and service haul road as
described above, all new roads and improvements in the Sending Area shall be routed so as to
avoid traversing publicly owned natural preserves, parks and recreation areas, areas identified
as environmentally sensitive wildlife habitat, wildlife corridors, or greenways, unless there is no
feasible and prudent alternative. Other than the referenced Wilson Boulevard extension and
service haul road, any new roads and improvements to existing roads within sending areas shall
be designed with aquatic species crossings, small terrestrial animal crossings, and large
terrestrial animal crossings pursuant to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
criteria. The portion of Wilson Boulevard that traverses through the Sending Area shall be
designed with aquatic species crossings and small terrestrial animal crossings. The
implementing Land Development Regulations for the NBM Overlay shall address bike lanes and
pedestrian pathways.
c, Greenway
- A NBM Greenway shall be created within the NRPA or sending lands following natural flowways,
as contemplated in the Community Character Plan prepared by Dover Kohl.
d. Red Cockaded Woodpeckers (RCW)
RCW nesting and foraging habitat has been mapped and used to delineate areas that are
appropriately designated as Sending Lands.
2. Natural Resource Protection Area NR (Revised text, page 95)
The NBM Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPAI includes seven sections of sands and three
partial sections or a total of t 6,075 acres and is located in the eastern portion of the NBM Overlay.
This area comprises about thirty -nine percent of the NBM Overlay. The NBM NRPA area has
concentrations of wetland land cover and listed species habitat, consistent with other Rural Fringe
NRPA's. This consideration combined with the fragmented ownership pattern and the state's desire to
purchase significant portions of this area warrants a different level of protection than in other NRPA
areas, particularly for incentives for the consolidation of lots to assist in the future preservation of
lands.
Planning Considerations
a. Consolidation
- The County should amend the Land Development Code to encourage further consolidation of
small parcels.
b. Public Acquisition
- The County and the property owners should support acquisition of privately owned land in the
NBM NRPA area as a mechanism for protection,
c. Sending Area
The NBM NRPA shall be designated as Sending Lands for purposes of the Transfer of
Development Rights (TDR) program.
d. TDRs
- TDR Credits generated from the NBM NRPA may be transferred to Sections 21 and 28 and the
west 1/4 of Sections 22 and 27, to other suitable locations within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use
District, or to the Urban Area at a ratio of 1 unit per 5 acres from Sending Lands, or one unit per
individual deeded parcel or lot that existed as of June 22, 1999, whichever is greater.
text break
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words sWek threug# are deleted.
Packet Page -2616-
13
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116/14
4. SENDING AREAS [Revised text, page 971
Within the NBM Overlay are t 4,598 acres of land that are identified as Sending Areas for the transfer
of development rights that are located in the western, eastern and southern portion of the study area.
The Sending Areas consist of the NRPA lands and t5 and' /, sections west of the NRPA. The sending
areas are locations where residential development is discouraged.
Endangered and threatened species are located within the Sending Areas, including colonies of Red
Cockaded Woodpeckers. Therefore, the protection of endangered and threatened species including
the protection of habitat are primary planning considerations in this area.
Planning Considerations
a. TDRs
Strongly encourage the transfer of development rights from the NBM Sending Areas to other
locations within the Rural Fringe or NBM Overlay outside the boundary of the NRPA, or to the
Urban Area.
b. Habitat Protection
- The Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element for
wildlife habitat protection shall apply to NBM Sending Lands.
c. Public Acquisition
- The County should support the public acquisition of Sending Lands in the NBM Overlay,
particularly in locations where endangered or threatened species are located.
« «« «« « «« * *« * ** text break * «* « «* « «« * «+ « ««
D. Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay [Revised text, page 113]
text break
Policy 1.2:
The. Overlay protects natural resources and retains viable agriculture by promoting compact rural
mixed -use development as an alternative to low- density single use development, and provides a
system of compensation to private property owners for the elimination of certain land uses in order to
protect. natural resources and viable agriculture in exchange for transferable credits that can be used
to entitle such compact development. The strategies herein are based in part on the principles of
Florida's Rural Lands Stewardship Act, . . Section 163.3248 Florida Statutes.
The Overlay includes innovative and incentive based tools, techniques and strategies that are not
dependent on a regulatory approach, but will complement existing local, regional, state and federal
regulatory programs.
« «« « «« « «« « «« ««« text break
Policy 4.2: [Revised text, page 1221
All privately owned lands within the RLSA which meet the criteria set forth herein are eligible for
designation as a SRA, except land delineated as a FSA, HSA, WRA or land that has been designated
as a Stewardship Sending Area. Land proposed for SRA designation shall meet the suitability criteria
and other standards described in Group 4 Policies. Due to the long -term vision of the RLSA Overlay,
extending to a horizon year of 2025, and in accordance with the guidelines established in GbapteF
463. 317 -7(1 Section 163.3168(2), Florida Statutes, the specific location, size and composition of
each SRA cannot and need not be predetermined in the GMP. In the RLSA Overlay, lands that are
eligible to be designated as SRAs generally have similar physical attributes as they consist
predominately of agriculture lands which have been cleared or otherwise altered for this purpose.
Lands shown on the Overlay Map as eligible for SRA designation include approximately 74,500 acres
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stMsk-t#reag► are deleted. 14
Packet Page - 2617 -
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16114
outside of the ACSC and 18,300 acres within the ACSC. Approximately 2% of these lands achieve an
Index score greater than 1.2. Because the Overlay requires SRAs to be compact, mixed -use and self
sufficient in the provision of services, facilities and infrastructure, traditional locational standards
normally applied to determine development suitability are not relevant or applicable to SRAs.
Therefore the process for designating a SRA follows the principles of the Rural Lands Stewardship Act
as further described herein.
text break
Policy 4.7: [Revised text, page 123]
There are four specific forms of SRA permitted within the Overlay. These are Towns, Villages,
Hamlets, and Compact Rural Development (CRD). The sCharacteristics of Towns, Villages, Hamlets,
and CRD are set forth in Attachment C and are generally described in Policies 4.7.1, 4.7.2, 4.7.3 and
4.7.4. Collier County shall establish more specific regulations, guidelines and standards within the
LDC Stewardship District to guide the design and development of SRAs to include innovative planning
and development strategies as set forth in Section
163.3168(2), Florida Statutes. The size and base density of each form shall be consistent with the
standards set forth on Attachment C. The maximum base residential density as set forth in
Attachment C may only be exceeded through the density blending process as set forth in density and
intensity blending provision of the Immokalee Area Master Plan or through the affordable- workforce
housing density bonus as referenced in the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element.
The base residential density is calculated by dividing the total number of residential units in a SRA by
the overall area therein. The base residential density does not restrict net residential density of
parcels within a SRA. The location, size and density of each SRA will be determined on an individual
basis during the SRA designation review and approval process.
text break * ** * rw *x* * #* * **
F. Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay [Revised text, page 135]
The Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay, depicted on the.Future Land Use Map, is
within the boundaries of the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Board
of County Commissioners on June 13, 2000. The intent of the redevelopment program is to
encourage the revitalization of the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area by providing
incentives that will encourage the private sector to invest in this urban area. This Overlay allows for
additional neighborhood commercial uses and higher residential densities that will promote the
assembly of property, or joint ventures between property owners, while providing interconnections
between properties and neighborhoods. The intent of this Overlay is to allow for more intense
development in an urban area where urban services are available. Two zoning overlays have been
adopted into the Collier County Land Development Code to aid in the implementation of this Overlay.
The following provisions and restrictions apply to this Overlay:
text break *, ,�« .* ►* ..�
4. Properties with access to 112 -4-1 US 41 East and /or Bayshore Drive and /or Davis Boulevard
(SR 84) and /or the west side of Airport- Pulling Road may be allowed a maximum density of 12
residential units per acre via use of the density bonus pool identified in paragraph 11, except
that no project may utilize more than 97 units — 25% of the total density pool units available.
The 97 unit cap will terminate when the BCC adopts, by LDC amendment, limitations and a
cap on the use of the 388 density pool units for any one project. In order to be eligible for this
higher density, the project must be integrated into a mixed -use development with access to
existing neighborhoods and adjoining commercial properties and comply with the standards
identified in Paragraph #8, below, except for mixed use projects developed within the "mini
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words 6tausk -t4eugh are deleted. 15
Packet Page -2618-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116114
triangle" catalyst project site as identified on the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment
Overlay Map. The "mini triangle" catalyst project site is eligible for the maximum density of 12
units per acre, with development standards as contained in the Gateway Triangle Mixed Use
District zoning overlay, adopted February 28, 2006 (Ordinance No. 06 -08), and amended
December 14, 2006 (Ordinance No. 06 -63). For projects that do not comply with the
requirements for this density increase, their density is limited to that allowed by the Density
Rating System and applicable FLUE Policies, except as may be limited by a future zoning
overlay.
text break
FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES [Revised text, final page of FLUE text]
Future Land use Map [Added new Future Land Use Map Series map]
Activity Center Index Map
text break
Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map
Coastal High Hazard Area Map
Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map
Gordon River Greenwav Conservation Area Designation Mar)
text break
Future Land Use Map and Map Series [New map, following FLUE text]
a. Create new Gordon River Greenway Conservation Area Designation Map.
[The above revision also affects the text entries in the Future Land Use Map Series listing appearing
on the Future Land Use Element Table of Contents pages.]
text break
[include the actual Gordon River Greenway Conservation Area Future Land Use Map labeled as, and
included in, this Exhibit "A ".]
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words strask through are deleted. 16
Packet Page -2619-
7/8/2014 17.D.
EXHIBIT A PETITION PL-2013-00v t tuo-r- -.-
GORDON RIVER GREENWAY CONSERVATION AREA DESIGNATION
100 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
"T
Ell
4
X
PREPARED BY CIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DWISION / PLANNING AND REGULATION
DATE: 3/2014 FILE. CPSR-2013-6.DWG
Packet Page -2620-
GOLMW GAYC PA"M Y
SUBJECT SITE
PL-2013-0001109/
CPSP-2013-6
LEGE
SUBJECT SITE
CITY LIMITS
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments
I. INTRODUCTION
CCPC Transmittal Draft
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT (ROSE)
11. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
RECREATION & OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
text break
text break
7/8/2014 17.D.
4116/14
[Revised text page 1]
[Revised text, page 2]
Policy 1.1.1: [Revised text, page 2]
The standards for levels of service (LOS) of County parks and recreation facilities appear in Policy
4.5, subseration "G" 1.5.G in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be used as the basis for
determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development.
text break
text break
[Revised text, page 5)
GOAL 2: T-WF= COUNTY SWALL PROMOTE A PARK SYSYTEM THAT INCLUDES REGIONAL,
COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS WITH PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS AND BIKE LANES
TO PROVIDE USEABLE OPEN SPACE TO MEET THE RECREATIONAL NEEDS OF RESIDENTS
WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT WILL BE
BASED ON THE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOSS) CONTAINED IN THE CIE.
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stR44hFo are deleted. 18
Packet Page -2621-
"TME
-T- -TWEATea RMIE. -
-wr "M=r
===rNn
'MMM" NZ
'-*Q
-:Is
r.Wj-.r-9r.M.19
OMAN
Wwr-
text break
[Revised text, page 5)
GOAL 2: T-WF= COUNTY SWALL PROMOTE A PARK SYSYTEM THAT INCLUDES REGIONAL,
COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS WITH PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS AND BIKE LANES
TO PROVIDE USEABLE OPEN SPACE TO MEET THE RECREATIONAL NEEDS OF RESIDENTS
WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT WILL BE
BASED ON THE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOSS) CONTAINED IN THE CIE.
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stR44hFo are deleted. 18
Packet Page -2621-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4116114
PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT
Stormwater Management Sub- Element (SM)
* ** * * * ** ** * ** text break
t. INTRODUCTION [Revised text, page 1]
This portion of the Collier County Growth Management Plan inventories both the natural conditions
and stormwater management activities within unincorporated Collier County. In Collier County, there
are two (2) primary service providers with regard to the provision of stormwater management
services. The County's Transportation Services Division maintains drainage systems associated with
County and State Roadways as well as the Secondary Drainage System. The Big Cypress Basin
Board, an arm of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), maintains the larger,
regional surface water management systems within Collier County. The regional drainage system is
also referred to as the Primary Drainage System.
However, management of stormwater is concerned not only with flood prevention (a quantity issue),
but also with the removal of various pollutants picked up by the stormwater as it flows across the
County's developed land areas (a quality issue). Such pollutants can include oils, greases, heavy
metals, pesticides, fertilizers and other substances, which can have a deleterious impact on the
County's natural systems and, above all, its groundwater quality. Note that, in this respect, there is
overlap in the intended purpose between the DFai+ae Stormwater Management and Natural
Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub elements Sub - Elements: both seek to protect aquifer recharge
areas. However, the emphasis of the DFainage Sub elemen Stormwater Management Sub - Element
is on surface water protection, whereas the emphasis of the Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge
Sub - element Sub - Element is on groundwater protection.
* ** * ** *** * «* * ** text break
One of the key principles of current stormwater management techniques is recognition of the need for
basin -wide (or watershed basin) planning. The stormwater management system has to be designed
so as to ensure that the final outlet point has adequate capacity to handle all discharges from the
upstream portion of the watershed under conditions present at the time of design. Subsequent
development upstream must then utilize stormwater management techniques and systems, which will
maintain predevelopment run -off conditions so that the capacity of the downstream portion of the
watershed is not exceeded. In this respect, there is an overlap between the intended purpose of the
Drainage Sub ejemeR Stormwater Management Sub - Element and Goal 2 of the Conservation and
Coastal Management Element, including the Watershed Management Plans discussed under
Objective 2.1 of the CCME.
* ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
text break
[Revised text, page 2]
* ** * ** * **
Policy 2.1: [Revised text, page 5]
The levels of service standards (LOSS) for drainage facilities and stormwater management systems
appear in Policy " 1.5.0 in the Capital Improvement Element.
* ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * **
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words strask-tlagh are deleted.
Packet Page -2622-
19
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16114
Policy 6.2: [Revised text, page 5]
Collier County's retention and detention criteria shall be one hundred and fifty percent (150 %) of the
water quality volumetric requirements provided in the
State of Florida's
Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume 1 (2013), or its successor, as it existed
at the time of project approval.
Policy 6.3: [Revised text, page 5]
Allowable off -site discharge rates shall be computed using a storm event of 3 day duration and 25
year return frequency. The allowable off -site discharge rates are as follows:
a.
951 Canal North Basin
0.11 cfs /acre
a-
Airport Road North Canal
0.04 cfs /acre
b.
Sub -basin
(North of Vanderbilt Beach Road)
1),7
Airport Road South Canal
0.06 cfs /acre
c.
Sub -basin
(South of Vanderbilt Beach Road)
d.
C-4 Basin
0.11 cfs /acre
G,
Cocohatchee River Canal Basin
0.04 cfs /acre
e.
f.
Corkscrew Canal Basin
0.04 cfs /acre
&
Cypress Canal Basin
0.06 cfs /acre
h.
Faka Union Canal Basin
0.09 cfs /acre
(North of 1 -75)
i.
Gordon River Extension Basin
0.09 cfs /acre
j.
Harvey Canal Basin
0.011 cfs /acre
k.
Henderson Creek Basin
0.08 cfs /acre
1.
1 -75 Canal Basin
0.06 cfs /acre
m.
Imperial Drainage Outlet Basin
0.12 cfs /acre
e-
Island Walk Basin
0.055 cfs /acre
n.
aka Harvey Basinj
4GI7
Lely Canal Basin
0.06 cfs /acre
o.
p.
Lely Manor Canal Basin
0.06 cfslacre
g
Main Golden Gate Canal Basin
0.04 cfs /acre
r.
Palm River Canal Basin
0.13 cfs /acre
s.
Pine Ridge Canal Basin
0.13 cfs /acre
Q. 1. 13 GWaGF9
g-
All other areas
0.15 cfs /acre
t.
The County may exempt projects from these allowable off -site discharge rates if any of the following
applies:
text break
2. It can be documented that the project currently discharges off -site at a rate higher than those
listed above. The documentation required for this purpose shall be prepared by a registered
professional engineer, and will consist of an engineering study which utilizes the applicable
criteria in the "SFWMD Basis of Review feF &AViFORMental Reseume PeFmit ApplirsatieRs State
of Florida's Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume 1 (2013), or its
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stfask through are deleted.
Packet Page -2623-
20
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16114
successor. The study shall be subject to review and approval by the County and SFWMD
staff. The study shall include the following site - specific information:
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT (TE)
text break
A. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS [Revised text, page 1 ]
text break
2. Traffic Circulation Constraints
In many parts of the Naples Urban Area, traffic circulation movements are constrained by the natural
features of the landscape such as the Gordon River. Still other parts offer constraints of the
man -made variety, such as golf courses and the Naples Airport. In many instances approved
developments (some existing, others not yet built) block the way of logical extensions of urban
collector and arterial roads.
The single most noticeable constraint is the Gordon River as it extends from the Naples Bay
northward under the East Tamiami Trail (US 41) to its connection with the Golden Gate canal system.
* ** + ** ** * *+ * ** text break
The characteristics of the highway network at this location resembles an "hour- glass ". On the western
extreme, US 41 and Goodlette Road converge on the narrow "straits" of the Gordon River bridge;
while to the east, US 41 and Davis Boulevard do likewise. The result is the typical "bottleneck" effect
when too much traffic volume is forced through a constricted area.
text break*
Policy 1.3: [Revised text, page 12]
The standards for levels of service (LOS) of County arterial and collector roads appear in Policy 4-5
sWbSeGti9R 'A2 1.5.A in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be used as the basis for
determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development.
Policy 1,4:
The standards for levels of service (LOS) of state and federal roads in the County appear in Policy
4.5, subseGtiGR "B" 1.5.8 in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be used as the basis for
determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development.
text break
Policy 5.4: [Revised text, page 16]
Pursuant to Section 163.3180, Florida Statutes and the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment
Strategy contained in the Future Land Use Element of this Plan, the South US 41 Transportation
Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) is hereby designated. Development located within the South
US 41 TCEA (MapTR -4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long
as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures established in Policies 5.5
and 5.6 below, and in consideration of the following:
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words sti:u& through are deleted. 21
Packet Page -2624-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16/14
text break
Policy 5.5: [Revised text, page 181
Commercial developments within the South U-S- US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception
from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification to the Transportation
Planning Department that at least four of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
strategies will be utilized:
text break
Residential developments within the South if-a- US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from
concurrency requirements for transportation shall provide documentation to the Transportation
Planning Department that at least three of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
strategies will be utilized:
text break
Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the
required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report
shall, for three ( years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the
use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the
applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three (3) years of development if they are
deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be made within this second three
year period and subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another
assessment shall be completed within three (3,) years and in three year increments until the TDM
strategies are deemed effective.
Developments within the South U-.-& US 41 TCEA that do not obtain certification shall meet all
concurrency requirements. Whether or not a concurrency exception is requested, developments will
be subject to a concurrency review. for the purpose of reserving capacity for those trips associated
with the development and maintaining accurate counts of the remaining capacity on the roadway
network.
text break
Policy 5.6: [Revised text, page 18]
The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) to encourage
compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that
provide multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each
TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in this
Transportation Element, Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of this Element. The following Transportation
Concurrency Management Areas are designated:
xxx M rx xxx x ** xxx text break
In order to be exempt from link - specific concurrency, developments within the TCMA must provide
documentation to the Transportation Planning DepaFtment Section that at least two Q Transportation
Demand Management (TDM) strategies utilized meet the criteria of the LDC. Monitoring of the use
and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring
report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three (3) years
following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of
the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies
DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stR44hreugh are deleted. 22
Packet Page -2625-
7/8/2014 17.D.
Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CCPC Transmittal Draft 4/16114
may be made within the first three U years of development if they are deemed ineffective.
Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be made within this second three year period and
subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment
shall be completed within three (3) years and in three year increments until the TDM strategies are
deemed effective.
text break
Policy 6.5: [Revised text, page 20)
The Collier County MPO's adopted Long Range Plan has identified a number of potential, critical
need intersections, including an interchange in the vicinity of 1 -75 /Everglades Boulevard; a US 4 4 US
41 /SR -CR 951 grade separated overpass; and, a Randall Boulevard /[mmokalee Road grade
separated overpass. The County shall pursue such projects in a manner consistent with the findings
of the AUIR and through the development of the FDOT 5 -year Work Program, as appropriate.
GAMES Planning SenncestCompmhensivelCOMP PLANNING GMP DATMComp Plan AmendmentM2013 GMPAs Outside of Cyde113 -6 Single GMPA Exhbt A_4 -15
final,docx
1'•
Words underlined are added, words stFUGk through are deleted.
Packet Page -2626-
23
7/8/2014 17.D.
24D A Wednesday, June 18, 2014 NAPLES DAILY NEWS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will
hold a public hearing on Jul 08, 2014, in the Board of County Commissioners
Chamber, Third Floor, Collier county Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East,
Naples, Florida. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.
The purpose of the hearing is to consider recommendation to the Board of County
Commissioners to transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity
(DEO) the Transmittal amendments to the Capital Improvement Element;
Conservation & Coastal Management Element; Future. Land Use Element and Fu-
ture Land Use Map and Map series; Recreation and Open Space Element; Storm
water (drainage) Sub - element of the Public Facilities Element; and Transportation
Element of the Growth Management Plan. The RESOLUTION title is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 14.
A' RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING 2011
EVALUATION AND. APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) BASED AMENDMENTS TO THE
COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, .ORDINANCE '89 -05, AS
AMENDED, TO FIX GLITCHES RELATED TO CHANGES IN THE 2011 EAR -BASED
AMENDMENTS AND TO REVISE FORMAT, STRUCTURE AND LANGUAGE FOR
INTERNAL CONSISTENCY SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
ELEMENT; TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT; CONSERVATION AND COASTAL
MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT; THE FUTURE
LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; THE
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT (DRAINAGE) SUB- ELEMENT OF THE 'PUBLIC
FACILITIES ELEMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF
THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC
OPPORTUNITY. [PL20130001109 /CPSP- 2013 -6)
All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed
Growth Management Plan Amendment will be made available for inspection at the
Planning & Zoning Department,— Comprehensive Planning Section, 28DO N.
Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday
through Friday. Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at
the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center,
3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled
hearing. Any questions pertaining to, the documents should be directed to the
Comprehensive Planning Section of the Planning & Zoningg Department. Written
comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Tuesday, July 08, 2014,
will be read and considered at the public hearing.
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier' County Board of
County Commissioners with respect to any matter, considered at such meeting or
hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may
need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record
includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to
participate in this proceeding,'. you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision
of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management
Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112 -5356,
(239) 252 -8380, at least two days .prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices
for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners
Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN .
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Martha Vergara
Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
Packet Page -2627-