Loading...
BCC Minutes 01/31/1989 R Xaple., Florida, January 31, 1989 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board ot County Co..i..ion.r. in and tor the County ot Collier, and also acting a. the Board of Zoning A~al. and.. the governing board(.) ot such speclal dl.trict. a. have been created accordlng to law and havlng conducted bus!ne.. hereln, ..t on thls date at 9:00 A.M. in a&GDLAa 8&18108 in Building "F" ot the Oovernaent Co.plex, Ea.t Maples, Florida, with the tollowing .eaber. pre.ent: CHAIRMAN: Burt L. Saunders VICE-CHAIRMAN: Max A. Ba..., Jr. Richard S. abcaban (Ab.ent) Micha.l J. Volpe Ann. Goodnight ALSO PRESENT: J..e. C. Oile., Clerk; Elli. Rottaan and Maure.n ~.nyon, Deputy Clerks: "ell Dorrill, County Manager; Ron McLe80re, Assl.tant County Manager; Toa Olliff, Acting Co88Unity Dev8lopaent Adainl.trator; Ken CUyler, County Attorney; Toa Crandall, Utilitie. Adaini.trator; George Archibald, Public Works Adainiatrator; Kevin O'Donnell. Publlc Services Ad8lnistrator; Willi.. Lorenz, Environaental Services Adalni.trator; Barry Buber, A..i.tant Public Morks Adalni.trator; Kaney Israelson. Adaini.trative As.i.tant to the Board; Deputles S.. Bas. and Toa Storrar, Sheriff'. Depart.ent. P8ge 1 ,; .c ' '><t.' --. """",,---_.,-"-"--"" .."_._---"",."",, ,,", JAKUARY 31, liSg hpe 81 Itea n MDnA AJI1) COIrSD'f AGD1)A - UPJtOV5U WIn CKUGU ec-.1.s1on.r B&8- 8OV84, aeccmd84 by eo...t88icmer .,.~~ aDd carr184 4/0, that the IIgeDda and cOD84rI1t IIgeDda be apph".....4 with the tollow1.Dg Chanqe8: Itea #5B Presentation by two teen participants in WKnow Your County 4-H, Collier County League ot Wo..n Voters, Collier County Public Schools - Rescheduled to February 28, 1989. Itea #1B1 Petitlon PU-88-11C, Mllson, Mlller, Barton, SolI a Peek, Inc. representing Harper Brothers, Inc. requesting Provisional Use "A" ot the "IW Industrial District tor an asphalt plant and material storage located on the northeast corner of Co..ercial Avenue and Progress Avenue in the Maples Productlon Park in Section 36, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, plus or ainus 7.ð4 acres - Continued to February 14, 1989, as per the Petitioner's request. Itea #9B4 Recoamendation for acceptance of Water/Sewer Ma8ter Plan tor the Colller Co~ty Oovernaent Center - To be rescheduled. It- 8aA DCPt.OTD 8UVI c-. AJ8.UU)S - PJtUDnD Co..issioner Saunders acknowledged the following eaployee., and presented a pin and a Certificate ot Recognition to: Hr. Luis Rosado, Road & Bridge - lð years of servlce Hr. John M. Abbott, Road & Brldge - 5 years of service It- nAi c.uarxvAL PZJDCIT 8..2 U ITrITIOJf C-8"1, a.~NJtA KAIDTD OF 'lD aKDLAJIDS CBJtISTID MIGaU'T ASSOCIA'1'IOJf UQV&8'fUø A PatIII'1' '1'0 COJmOC'1' A CADIVAL ROllI rDatlARY 6-12, lilt O. '1'D IJIMOULD CBILD ImVKLOPIID'l' CDTD SIn - APPROVED A8D StIR.ITT BOIID MInD Acting Commun1ty Developaent Adainlstrator Ollltf stated that Barbara Hainster ot the Redlands Chrlstian Migrant As80clation is reque8tlng a permlt for a carnlval to be held in Iaaokalee February 6-12, 1989, on the ¡aaokalee Chl1d Developaent Center 8it. on the north slde of Hain Street between 4th Street North and 6th Street North. In additlon, he Indicated that Mrs. Malnster i. requesting that the Surety Bond requlreaent be waived. Be noted that .ince this 18 a locally 8ponsored carnlval, it 18 not unusual to waive tb. surety , ~ ~ > i ~ j ~ ;1 ~ ~',2, .' J ~~ ..-,.-.--. .. ---. ,,~.. '"-_."-""-""'-"'~'" "...,,-..--,......-"" JAKUARY 31, un bond, which ensures that the property be cleaned up after the event is held. Co8a1_1oner B&8- 8OV84, a.ec0Dded by Co8a1..1oner CJoodziIgh~ Im4 carr184 4/0 to approve C«rn1val Perait 8"2, and that the 8V8'ty boD4 be wa19'84. . ~ 'c, . ~ " . ,< \ -{ ( Page 3 ,,( '/ . ...,-.---------- '--"---' " JAKUARY 31, nag It_..-l ItDOLOTI 011 8 .- 2 1, UQt1U'1'IWO THAT TD J"LOIUDA DKPUr-..J" 01' 'J'UJI8POIt- TA'fI08 IrV4LOATZ PROPOS.u.s raa AL'fDJIATK 'fR.U'7IC JWOnS EWTIaI.0/EXITI.O MARCO ISLAJD VIA S.R, ið1 AJfD C.R. t2 - ADO P1'.w Public Works Ad.lnlstrator Archlbald advlsed that this ite. 1. a follow up to discusslons that were held In December relating to road- way service levels and 8atety regardlng truck tratflc froB O.S. U and S.R. 951 to Harco Island. He advlsed that Staff has prepared a re8O- lutlon with three aajor polnts: To begin dlalog with the Florida Departaent of Tr&n8pOrta- tion (FDOT) regardlng proper 8ignage relating to an alternate route to Harco Island vla C.R. 92. He noted that currently C.R. 92 has very llttle trafflc, and It ls the shortest route to the south side of the lsland. Two other provlslons request legal interpretations fro. FDOT, as to whether welght restrlctlon. can be placed on special permltted loads, or on trucks that are In excess of 20 ton8, and are traveling to Harco on S.R. 951. Hr. Archibald stated that the provi8ions 8et forth good recogni- tion that C.R. 92 is an optional route to Marco Island, and bopefully, sore people will take advantage ot thls road on a voluntary basi.. He noted that a traffic plan wll1 be presented to the Board regarding the aarklng ot U.S. 41 indicating the second route to Marco Island. In answer to Co..issioner Hass~, Mr. Archibald stated tbat Staff he. concerns regarding the brldge on C.R. 92, which 1. a ...ll concrete bridge wlth wood plllngs. He advi.ed that the plana for the alternate route, will be subject t~ laproveaents of that bridge. He .... Indicated that today's request ls a aatter of obtainIng autborization to contact FDOT, to obtaln an oplnlon troa them. Co8ai..ioner Shan..hca 8OV84, 8eCCn4ed by eo.a.t..i0D8r ..... aDd carrIed 4/0 that Resolution 8.-21 be adopte4, and 8taff to !AJUate de81gn of Interi. bridge .tructural i8prov...nt.. ;r ,.' '1 ,;. it Page" .. 1,.1 i{:,r". 'P~'" .' ----.' .....--,.", """"-"'~"---"-"'-"" ...", ",.....",--"..-.--..,- ...--.---,....".-.",.. '., , ,~ :~ ~1 .1AJroARY 31, 198i ",. It- 8982 ItZCOI8I&.II.uATIO. TO canIDa rmrDIW ALT'DD.'1'In8 AJI1) A conJU.C'l 'l'O r&alV~ 'I'D FIJIAL DUIOJr FOa DKKDOIW WICJGIn PUS - ~..".y DaCI..UtZD; COtd" It tIT I VI: S KL&CT I 011 PROCU S 1U. I VIm ; 1'1' An TO I'Jt(A¡ &AU WI 'I'B nJIAL DUIaJr FOR DUDOUG, AJrD ADVISORY COMMI'l'TD: TO IVALUA'R UD PUSDT TO BeC UCUl'lRulvATIO.S U SOtJItCK OF J'tJJrD8 FOJt 'I'D WKDGIW AJI1) LOIrO TXJQI MAIJrTPUCK As.istant Public Works Admin18trator Huber advl.ed that a recoa- aendation i. being presented to consider fundlng alternatives tor dredging Wiggins Pass. He noted that the objectlve ls to deter.ine vlable tundlng sources tor l..edlate and long-tara dredglng of Wiggins Paa., and to establish condltions for perforaing tinal de8ign services required tor dredglng durlng 1989. He stated that he has included an Issue Paper, as contained In the agenda package. Mr. Huber indicated that based upon the 8cope ot service. and costs contained in a proposal .ubaltted by Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc., the tentatlve cost to provide the required services would be $28,960, adding that It approved, Staff will forward the contract to the Board ot County Co..lssloner. for approval. Be stated that the Wiggins Pass Conservaney has Indlcated that If this proposal ls accepted, they wl1l sake a co..itaent to raise the difference of the cost, and provide relabur.eaent to the County. He noted that there i8 currently $21,000 In Fund 304, re..lnlng troa the original dredging, and a budget aaendaent 1. requested In the a.ount of $1,960, to accomplish the final design. He indlcated that if the dredging is to be done in 19a9, Statt wlll need to proceed i..e- dlately, since the tlnal d~81gn will take 90 day., and an additional 60 days tor the biddlng process. He advlsed that the dredglng can only be accoapllshed durlng the aonths of Aprl1 through Deceaber. Øe reco..ended that the Board approve the request to enter Into a contract to pertora the tinal deslgn .ervlces nece.sary to obtain the co.t ot construction tor dredglng Mlgglns Pas.; authorize a budget aaendaent to provide the addltlonal funds for 888e; and direct the Advlsory Coa.ittee to evaluate and present to the Board recoaaen- datlons as to source of funds tor the actual dredglng and long-term ". ': ;' .;} J, ';. P8Øt!, II ~ 1 - ..,"_...... ~,.._.__.. .__._.~"..._--"..__._,,- ---,., ,I. .. JAKUARY U, U8l. ~Ó "N.- ',,~ aaintenance. ' ~ " Co..l~sloner Saunders questloned whether there i. a proble. with the ls8Ue ot coapetltlve negotiation? County Attorney Cuyler stated that Statt has laid out the basi. that the Board declare that there ls a valld publlc eaergeney, due to the tact that there is a construction dredglng window witbin a certain period ot tise this year, and it the County ls to go forward, 1t should be done now. Coaaissioner Hasse questioned how long this eaergeney has been golng on? Mr. Huber advlsed that the last tiae the Pas. was dredged was in 1983-84, wlth three years ot aonltoring, and that is what has generated the peraltting process tor the n~ dredglng. He indicated that the Pass needs to be dredged as soon aa pos.ible to provide safe boatlng. Clerk 011es questloned whether an eaergency can be declared that contravenes the provlsion ot Florida Statute. regardlng co.petitive negotlatlon? He further stated that this issue bas been di.cussed .ince la.t suaaer, and It It ls an eaergency, questioned why .teps have not been taken betore now to coapetltlvely negotlate? Be stated that the cost ot design/peraltting and project aonltorlng by Coastal Englneering In the Issue Paper shows 880,000, compared to a Conatruc- tion cost ot $200,000, which is more than the $19ð,000 for Wiggin. Pass dredging in the past. He noted that the design/peraitting and project aonitorlng was about $'°,000 at that time. Hr. Huber stated that the $80,000 includes per.ltting co.ta, final d..lgn, engineering services during constructlon, and anticipated aonltorlng services atter the contract is completed. Be .tated that the services during constructlon and aonltoring co.t. were .'&,800 the last tiae the Pass was dredged, noting that this did not include per- alttlng or tlnal deslgn cost., whlch were In exce.. of $100,000. Co..i.sloner Shanahan stated that there should be an wapple. to appl~s" cosparlson It the Board i. to sake a decl.10n. He noted that Page 8 J~ -". -".. ,---,.._--,--_" """""""""""'-""'---"-'- ,,---........,. JAJroARY 31, 1989 It he understands today's request, approval i. being .ougbt for the study ot the project. and then the results will be brought before the Board ot County Co..l..ioners tor a declsion. Mr. Huber stated that the p~rpose ot this it.a is to obtain appro- val to enter into a contract to pertora the tlnal de.ign .ervice. with Coa.tal Englneering, slnce they have been Involved "ith the project .1nce It. inception. He noted that'8 "here the consultant ..lection proce.s coaes in. In ansMer to Clerk 011es, County Attorney Cuyler advi.ed that it there ls a valid public eaergeney, Florlda Statute. doe. allow the competitive selection process to be walved. He noted that It is up to the Board to deter.ine on a ca.e by case basi., what an ewtergeney ls. Co..issloner Saunders questloned It the Board deteralne. that thls project 1. to be constructed durlng 1989, and the only feasible way to do thl. ls to proceed "lth the selection ot an engineer, and walve the cospetitive negotiation act, would that be a sufficient tlndlng tor the declaration ot a eaergeney to justlty waiving coa- petltlve 8election? County Attorney Cuyler indicated that he believe. this would be just1tiable, but added that he sugge.t. that the Board word their flndlng a. strongly as posslble, "lthout gettlng Into liabilIty Issues. Coaalssloner Hasse asked It an eaergency i. declared, when can thls be put to a reterendua to the people In the de.igna~ed area? County Manager Dorrlll advi8ed th5t there has been no directive troa the Board ot County Co..issloners to con81der a referendua. He noted that the tinal portion ot Statt'8 recoamendatlon i8 that the Advisory Co..ittee deter.ine optlon8 tor constructlon dollar., and present their recoamendatlon8 to the Board. He indlcated that Staff i. not proposing a reterendua at thls polnt, even though It aay be an optlon. Mr. Huber stated that latest d18cu8sions and direction by tbe . k Page 7 .'. <".;. ',"i~ :"'~ ,;", ; .:.'" ' , - or ,_." " ...-"..-- ,.""...-----.".- ,_.._,---,., ..,.,.- ,..,.-. JAKUARY 31, 1989 Board are that construction of the dredglng will be tunded eo-eo, by boat regl.tratlon tund. and private contribution.. Øe indicated tbat thls is a viable source ot funding, addlng that he will b. aeetlng with the Advisory Board to evaluate the various .ource. of funding, and present a recommendation ot 8ame. Hr. Paul Harvey, member ot the Wigglns Pa88 Advlsory Council stated that he teels that there i. an emergency, In that, the Taxing Dlstrict was created on the basi8 of the voter. and navigation. Be noted that the Pass ls stlll blocked, and people .till run aground. He .tated that he would like to 8ee the project .OVe forward so that the hard cost tlgure wl1l be known, and the ðO' tlgure wll1 be known. Hr. Glenn Grlttln, representlng the Mlgglns Pas. Conservaney stated that they are In concurrence with the Staff recoaaendation, and are prepared to fund the dlfference between the $21,000 and the 828,000 to complete the peralt and biddlng spec proces.. Mrs. Emily Haggl0 stated that the MSTU, as structured, i. flawed, and she hopes that It wl11 be resclnded or rewrltten. She indicated that the Advisory Council is tied to the ordinance, noting that the Council say have to b~ restructured, it the ordinance 1. not iaple- aented. She state~ that her concern ls, 1. the dredglng tor 8afety, or tor convenience and acco..odatlon? She indlcated that aany people do not know the waterways, and aany are poor navlgator8. She .tated that she called DER in Ft. Hyers and Tallahassee, and expre..ed her concerns regarding the need to dredge, at this polnt. She indicated that DER teels that It would be prudent tor the County to take a look at the Pas.. before any dredging ls done, to ensure that dredging for safety is necessary. She stated that In Harch, 1981, the Wiggin. Pa.. Conservancy had contracted wlth Coastal Englneerlng to obtain the ten year dredging peralta tor the Pass, and questioned whether this contract was approved by the County, and ls this bill paid? Hr. Huber stated that the County dld not approve thl. contract, and the Wigglns Pass Conservancy has pald a portlon of the cost., noting that the bälance due tor the.e servlces are Included in the Page' J~ ""~'-"'---""'-'~"'-""""""."" ""-..-..."" , --......-.-..-.-...."" "...... '--"..-..--.-".. JAKUARY 31, 1981 i, ., tinal design contract that wll1 coae to the Board for approval. Dr. Hlchael Steven, Vice Presldent ot Coa.tal Engineering, .tated that the concerns and questions are valld and appropriate. Re Indi- cated that In Hay, 1981, Coastal Engineering conducted the final .et ot surveys that were requlred by the DHR, as part ot a three-year post construction aonito:ing prograa to docuaent the behavlor of the pa.s, and the aove.ent ot the 8and fill. He noted that the 8urvey indicated that the Pass Buttered substantlal shoallng, and baaed upon aeetlngs held between the Miggins Pass Conservaney, County, and Coa8tal Englneering in September, 1987, the County approved an application for aalntenance dredge peraits. He advlsed that when the Pass was ini- tlal1y dredged, It was approved ae a County project, wlth a large por- tion ot the tunde provided by donation. and collectlon aethods troa the Wiggins Pass Conservaney. He Indicated that the peralt process continued tor a year, and the cost was $14,000, and $~,OOO has been pald by the Conservancy. Dr. Steven noted that the current work that i. needed involve. channel surveys tor $3,000, preparatlon of plan. and 8pecitication. for $1,300, and the bidding and negotlatlon phase wlll cost about $2,800, and approximately $8,000 during the construction pha.e. Co..lss1oner Saunders questloned whether the $8,000 that 1. owed to Coastal Engineering tor prlor work contracted by the Conservaney wlll be rei.bursed tree the proposed contract? Hr. Huber stated that the balance ot the peraitting cost. are Included in the $28,960. Coaøi.sloner Saunders indicated tnat there is nothing in the backup or the Executive Suaaary that adv18.s the Co..i.sion of thi., and noted that he may have a problea with u8ing the propo.ed funds to pay tor services that were contracted for by a prlvate organization. He stated that wlthout backup aaterlal, he cannot aake a decision. Comaissioner Has.e stated that he belleves the $8,000 r...ining troa the prlor contract .hould be deducted froa the $21,000, to be funded by the County. Page g j5 ....-..,-"--,.-."..-",.,, .,,-----.,----------.- ----.. --- JA1fUARY 31, un ,t' '<, '",' :, County Manager Dorrill indicated that if this type of propo.al was not pursued, the County would be paying Coastal Engineering to redo work that is already under cont~act that will be assigned to the County. Co..l.sioner Saunders 8tated that the Executive Suamary doe. not explain What the current .1tuatlon 1., and what the County i. contracting to do. Mrs. Maggio noted that she under8tand8 that the County will be paying tor the peraittlng, but indicated that her concern i. whether thl. ls co.lng fro. the General Fund, or will it be co.ing fro. a Speclal Tax District that she i. paying into. She .tated that 8he has DO objectlon to dredglng the Pass for satety, but requested that 8Onltorlng be done, to ensure that dredglng is nece..ary tor this purpose. Dr. Ruben Cralg stated that he concurs with Mrs. Maggio'. reaarks regarding .atety ot the Pass. He noted that dredglng will have to be 881ntalned, and wlthout aonitoring ot Turkey Bay this area will be .ealed ott in a t- years. County Manager Dorrill adv18ed that it i. iapo..ible to obtain per.its tor dredging the Turkey Bay area becau8e of a eerie. ot gra8. flats. Co..l..ioner Shanahan advlsed that the recoaaendation of Staff 1. that a .ource ot funds be deter.lned for the actual dredging and long- ter. .aintenance. Hr. Bill Bergan, resldent of Vand,rbilt Beach, 8tated that he encourages the Comaission to pursue this project very slowly. He noted that many at the people In this area are on flxed Inco..s, and It wll1 be a hardship for the. to pay for so..thing that will benefit the pleasures of other people. Co8ai..icmer ShaNlMn 8OV84, see cmd84 by Coaa1a81 <mer GoodD t gh t , t 0 .",. abead wlth the final cSeaign for the dredging of Wigg1D8 Pa88, and the Advisory CouncIl to evaluate and present a racon . 048t1oa to the 8oard .. to a eource of t-aDd8 for the actua1 dredging and loag-tera "",,10,':.r' "" . ":,,,"jf, ... ,-,--" "..,---..,--.-,- __'hh J~ 11, 1M' -.1A~8D8DCtÞ. County Attorney Cuyler adv18ed that it tbe service. of Co_tal Engineerl~g are to be u8ed, a. a result ot their prior involveaent wlth the project, the ba.ls tor an eaergeney to walve the coapetitive .election 8U8t be 8et. Co..l.sloner Saunders stated that he feel. the ba.i. tor the eaergeney 1. that thl. project 1. to be constructed in 1989, and the only way thl. will be physically po.slble i. to proceed with the englneering, as quickly a. possible, and because of that, an e..rgency 1. declared. CO8ai..icmer S~JI.....h-n 888Dde4 hi. 8Ot1on to also 1Dcla4e ~1: aD 1.U'~ be declared, on the baa1. ~hat this project 1. to be COD8~racted in 1111, IID4 ~he only W8Y thi. wIll be pby8ically po88ible 18 to proceec1 with the engizwer1ng .. quJ.ckly .. poeelb18, aDd ~o aoaitor the project to cS8tera1ne the 188f81:y aDd ~.....(&J~ f8Ctore, - eagge8te4 by the clU.zena of Collier CoaD1:y. ~t ..1=-r ~Ight 8Ccepte4 the 888Dd8eDt. In answer to Co..lssloner Ha..e, Hr. Griffin stated that the fund. to be provlded by the Conservancy wll1 be put on depo.it to deaonatrate that they are avallable, prior to the final contract with Co_tal Englneerlng. Opon call for the CfG8'8Uon, the 8Ot1on carri84 ./0. . '" ,. - ,; , " . t : ';' " ~ " , i.I )'! if, ¡, "irJ ~~ ~'J II ~ .. PaQ'!t 11 j1. i-I ~ ~ Jt.+>< ..--.." .---.".-, _.,- -.-.."..,...--,-.'" , '--'---'-" c," JAKUARY 31, 19at It- nu JŒ8OLO'fIOJr 1"'22, AOTBOJUZIJrG 'l'D ACQUISITIO8 OF r..ums 1ST GIft, PUJtC1U.U OK COJrDDDlATIOJr RCUUA.RT FOR 'l'D J'OOR-LAJrIJrG OF STAn JtOAD , 01 J'RO8C 0.'. 41 TO 'l'D MARCO KIVU 8RIDGZ - ADOrTlW Public Morks Ad.inistrator Archlbald stated that this ite. 18 a request tor the Board to consider the acqui8itlon of Parcel 141, the S.R. 951 Project, by gift, purchase or condeanation. He indicated that the parcel In que.tlon i. located on the east .1de of S.R. 'ðl, 600 teet south ot U.S. 41, and contaln. 2,000 feet ot frontage along S.R. 951. He noted that thi8 parcel "as appraised, agreeaent. and de.ds slgned and approved by the Board of County C0881ssioner. in s.ptesber, 1988, however, Statf has been unable to aate final pay8ent because ot a water a.sess.ent encuabrance on thl. property. Be stated that Statt is requestlng the option of golng to condeanation, and tben proceed "lth the Order ot Taklng. Co..l.sioner Shanahan questloned it the parcell. acquired by .a1- neat doaain, "111 the ownership be liable for the back a8se....nt of $31, 0001 Hr. Archibald stated that the County cannot force the owner to pay the water a..e.s.ent as part of the clo.lng on the property that will be obtalned fro. hi.. He noted that the owner has elected not to pay thls ass..ssent. He indicated that the alternatlve wll1 be to go betore a judge through an Order ot Taklng. County Attorney Cuyler advised that the a.se...ent lien 1. attached to the entlre property, and it the owner doe. not pay it off, the Court can reaove that assess.ent fro. the property, and the County "ill have the rlght-of-"ay free and clear. Co8a1..icmer lhaft.8ban 8O'9'8d, 88COD484 by ec-J.aicmer ..... 8Dd carrIed 4/0, to adopt Reaolution ""22, .v.thoriziDg the acqa.1.1t1on of 18D48 by gift, purchase or con4e8naUon nec_sary for tU fO'ClZ'-l8Uing of State ao.d '61 fro. O.S. 41 to the Marco River Bridge. County Attorney Cuyler adv18ed that any contract. wl11 coae back to the Board. Co..l..ioner Hasse que.tioned the aaount that the County baa paid '" Page 12 . jg' ., .- ,,"._, . ....,,'. ""---'-""-"" ."""" .."'..".....,.--.-,-.. ,-."'-.-.-, ,",- JAJroARY 31, au to date, and what the aaount i. antlcipated In the future to acquire the properties tor the tour-laning of S.R. 9ðl? Hr. Archibald .tated that he wll1 provide a euaaary report to the Board. He noted that the County 18 currently approachlng 82 8111ion and will be exceedlng that aaount. ' f Page 13 !I . .. ----.-.. ..w ",-", "."."_..._-".""",,-,,"" "",.", --,_.,...."""._,~..,...,...- "..,.._--~,_._.__.. v JAKUARY 31, 19B8 It- n.. 8Z80L0TI0Ir "-23, UQO'UYIJfG D.USFD OF aIØII'1'-<W-tU.T M6W&UI V.8. 41 AJI1) ICI.ItCO ISIoUD ( P AJtCU 11 7 ) noli TO '1'JttJ1TDI OF TO IftDIU.L ~-T TKt1ST FUJII) OW TO nATa OF J'LOKIDA (lID) TO COLLIn \;V\I- ¡. I - ADOPTED Public Works Adainlstrator Archlbald stated that thls itea relate. to a 3 acre parcel, located &,000 teet south ot Manatee Road, on the west sld. ot S.R. gIn, and 1. owned by the Tru.tee. nt the Internal IIlproveaent Trust Fund. He noted that Statt has been atteapting to re.olve how the transfer ot property fro. DNR to the County will occur. He stated that the County Attorney'. office has prepared a re.olutlon which aake. an otter to the Trustees, whlch is the Governor and the Cablnet, to accept the appraised value ot the property for transter. He advlsed that the appraised value of this property i. 83.,900. Co..ls.10ner Shanahan questioned it there are two reaaining par- cels to be acquired after today'. action? Mr. Archlbald replied atUraatlvely. ec-1_iooer 8b~bc:I 8OV84, eec0Dd84 br ec-.t-.toaer ..... aQd carr.184 4/0, that ItAt8oluUon 1.-23, requ88t1Dg tl'1lD8far of r.tgh-t-of- W8Y for the four IIlD8 .-xp8Ds1on of Stat. Ito84 101 be'tweeD U.8. 41 aDd II8rco IelaDd (Parcal 110. 117 ) froa the Traa1:... of the IntU'D&1 I.8pzo....nt 'l'ruat FaDd of the Sta-t. of Wlorida to Collier CoaD'ty be adopt ad. ". ' ,.. ' "'" .. Page 14;":~ '" ~ '..,_. ..'" ..e -'--""--""""""'~""'- JAJroARY 31, UU ..... Rec...: 10:10 A.M. - aac0DV8D84: 10:11 A.M. at Mblch u.. Deputy Clerk hDyon replaced Deputy CI.rk JIoff88D ..... It- nit'! SO'PPLDtIJrTAL AOR&.uI.uI'1" InTJI COASTAL DOIJlEDIJrO CO.SDLTAJr'1'S, rife. TO PItOVID& nzLIMIJIARY DUIGJr BOYlCU roa TO COLLID COu.n B&ACJI .OO1Usmœn PRO.1ECT - COJITIJV&D roa on 1ØU Assistant Public Works Administrator Huber stated that thls agreeaent provides tor a portlon ot the preli.inary deslgn service. required tor the project, addlng that because ot the budget constraints the total tunds are not available. Be stated that on February 23, 1988. the Board accepted the Study and Report on Beach Rourl.h8ent which wa. pertoraed by Coa.tal Englneering Con8Ultant. and the Ad Hoc Co..ittee was also directed to evaluate potentlal .curces ot tundlng tor the project. He stated that under the local funding, the Clty ot Naples has recently agreed to contrlbute their fair .hare, which is estiaated to be 8100,000 whlch ls subject to an interlocal agree_n t. He noted that in June, 1988, a sand source investigation was authorlzed by the Board and DHR otflcial8 Indlcated that Collier County projects have received tavorable con.ideratlnn relative to belng placed on an authorized llst for funding in the upcoaing legislative session. He stated that the Ad Boc Co..lttee has deteralned that It would be very laportant to have a repre.entative in Tallahassee to coordinate the progra. as well as being able to ensure that the County is actively pursulng the design and ultlaately wll1 begin construction. He noted that this will enhance the County's opportunity to obtain tundlng a.sistance fro. the State a. well a. the Federal Governaent. He stated that last week the Board adopted a re80- lutlon that requested the Corps ot Engineer. to reactivate a study that was started in the 1970's and was dropped becau.e of lack of local interest, adding that It ls very important to obtain Federal a-upport. He .tated that the budget constraints for thla project are 8169,000 thls fiscal year, addlng that this suppleaental agreeaent would include the services that would provide the deslgp to a point that would indlcate to the State that Collier County is actively Page 15 .F4"";' -. .0, '."" """-'",""'~'.."""--'-'-"" -..-..------- ,~,._- '.,-_.. - .JAHUARY 31, 1989 pursuing the project. He noted that thls supplemental agr..sent includes a sub-consultant. T.A. Herbert Ii Associates. that will pro- vide the required representation In Tallahassee. He stated that it is the recozaendation ot Staff that the Board enter Into a supple.ental Agreeaent Kith Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. to provide i..e- diate servlces necessary relative to prellmlnary deslgn and tunding assistance tor the Collier County Beach Hourlshment Project and that the Ad Hoc Commlttee be directed to deter.lne a tundlng source that would enable completion ot the preliminary design services In a tlmely aanner. In anlnfer to Commissioner Shanahan, Hr. Huber stated that thls is a continuation ot an original agreement that the County approved, addlng that this is the next phase ot the project and is included in the general provisIons ot the orIg1nal agreement. He stated that this is tor the preliminary design process. In answer to Commissioner Hasse. Mr. Huber stated that 5169,000 ls currently included in the budget tor the current tiscal year and that Is Khat is available at thIs point in tIme, adding that the $100,000 is >t.n indication trom the City ot Naples that they would agree to contrlbute as their fair share. He stated that to date there i. no agreesent between the City and the County to guarantee thls. He stated that this Item is to sisply obligate the $169,000 tor the design at this point In time. County Manager Dorrill stated that this is tor the prellminary design development ettort and to keep the County eligible tor poten- tial tunding. He stat~d that tlnal desIgn wlll entail the preparatlon ot constructlon specitications and bid documents, addlng that as part ot this recommendation Staff should also be authorlzed to explore and bring back an inter local agreement with the City ot Naples. Mr. Fred Voss, representlng the Colller Beach Preservatlon Society and the Greater Naples Civic Association, stated that both organlza- tions are strongly in support ot the Idf'.a ot renourlshlng and keeplng the beaches as they have been in the past. He stated that this i. the Page lIS ~1 ,,-, .-. .-. . --,c" c ~-,"..",--"_.",--""-",---",-",.,,,,,_.. ' , """c_""""-,,"'-'--" JAJruARY 31, 1989 next step in the process and nothing else can be done until th18 has been co.pleted, adding that he urges the Board to approve thls. Hr. R1chard Botthot, repreoenting the Economic Developaent Counc 11, stated that he would urge the Board to proceed as qulckly as possible with the beach nourishment process as it ls vital to the eco- nomic well-being and this process should be continued. Hr. Ray Miller, P.I!:., reterred to a publlcation ot the Florlda Shore and Beach Preservation Associatlon and stated that it llsts Collier County In two areas tor possible 8tate tund1ng, addlng that the turtherance ot this contract will enhance the County's posltion to get them tros the pending list to the actual tundlng li.t. Mrs. Charlotte Westsan, representlng the League ot Woaen Voters, stated that there should be an Interlocal agreeaent wlth the City of l'Iaples tor the 9100,000 that they are going to contribute. She stated that a good portion ot the County-wide beaches are in the Clty of Naples. County Hanager Dorrill stated that the Board can approve th18 Itea with the condition that an interlocal agreeaent be brought back. Hrs. Westman questioned it Fund 301 is golng to be the .ource of the tundlng and it so, would it be double taxation, to wh1ch Co..issioner Saunders stated that the renourishaent ot a beach would qua lity tor funding under this tund, but the residents ot Harco Island would not be charged tor this project. He stated that th18 wa. a policy decision made by the Board because Harco I$land re.ldents are paying tor their own beach renourishment project and there say have to be some appropriate budget amendments prepared to be sure that Harco Island taxpayers are not paylng tor the Collier County beach renClurishaent project. Mrs. Westman questioned the total cost ot the prelimlnary de81gn, to which Hr. Huber stated that it is estimated to co.t $660,000. Mrs. Westman stated that she teels that the Corps ot Englneers should reactivate their part in this project and que.tloned if there are any .spects ot thls study that the Corps ot Englneers wll1 par- Page 17 '1 ...."",. -"....------..- '----- .1 AJruARY 31, 1989 ticipate in, to which Hr. Huber stated that the next step in reac- tivating the Corps ot Engineers study would be to go through Congress. He stated that a re.olution will be presented to the Congr.....n and Senators to get this matter started. Tape n Co..issloner Saunders questloned if the Corps ot Engineer. has been consulted concerning dolng the engineerlng and de.lgn work ot this project, to which Mr. Huber stated that there has been Bose con- tact, but it "'as concluded that because of the time fr_e involved, 1t did not tit into the County's tillle frallle. In answer to Mrs. Westman, Hr. Huber stated that intoraatlon has to be presented to the leglslative delegation withln the next aonth with regards to funding assistance. Mrs. Westlllan stated that Coastal Engineering has completed preli- minary and final designs tor Harco Island beaches and questloned it some ot th¡¡t experience could be applied to the County project and, theretore, cut sollie of the dealqn process, whereby, reduclng the cost? Mr. Huber stated that the baslc prlnclples are the saae but the actual details as to where the sand is and how 8Uch ls needed varies from project to project and cannot be carried tro. one project to another. Co..issloner Saunders stated that the Corps of Engineers wll1 U8ua 11 y do a 11 of the design work on these project., a. well as finding the sand areas, analyzing It. the actual deslgn of how the beach will be renourished. as well as what type ot equipaent wl11 be used. He stated that the County was involved with the Corps ot Engineers on this project but they were not able to design thls pro- ject. He stated that Mr. Huber has Indicated that this ls not necessarily the case, adding that he teels that 1t is important that a contact to the Corps of Engineers be aade a priority to see what ser- vlces they wl11 provide for a Colller County beach proje~t. He stated that it the County can save on deslgn work, this needs to be investl- gated. He stated that he does not have any proble. wlth proceeding Page 18 4'1 .--,,--..-----,... , , ,-...---,,- ,..- - ..-".., "'--"-- JAKUARY 31, 1989 with this contra~t with the condition that this contact be made end that there are appropriate provisionø in this contract tor tenalnatlon it the Corps ot Engineers will provlde the 8ervlce. He stated that the beach renourish.ent project is one ot the aost isportent projects that the Board will be dealing with in the near future and he wants to be tJUre that the County is utilizlng their funds as ettlclently as possible. County Manager Dorrill stated that thl. could be incorporated as a second condition to the inter local agree.ent with the Clty ot .aples, adding that this is in keeping with the expressed concern that Staff do whatever is possible to keep the project eligible tor potentlal State and/or Pederal tunding. Cleric Giles stated that according to the Flnance Director'. report a little over 5300.000 has already been spent and the total engl- neering cost tor the preliminary design. the tinal design and project .onitoring is 51.5 million and Sectlon 281 of the Florida Statutes requires that there be competitive negotiations it the contract is over $25.000 tor a continuing contract. adding that an esergeney would have to be declared with regards to thls project. County Attorney Cuyler stated that Staff has indlcated to hi. that this consultant was competitively selected with thls entlre project in .ind and the question is whether the Board looks at each phase of this project as a separate project needing separate coapetitive selectlon and a po.sible different engineer on each pha.e or whether the Board looks at this project as whole. He stated that his understandlng 1. that this type ot situation constitu~e. a .ingle project and the engineer is competitively selected with that understandlng at the beginning. He stated that the original coapetitive selection con- te.plated all the services belng provided and thls does not tall under a continuing contract under the Statutes because it does not fall Into that detinition. Commissioner Saunders stated that there is a technlcal legal question that has been ralsed as to whether this project needs to be Page 19 .10 -,-, , ..--,~,-",.._.._---_._-- .._-,,~- JAJfUARY 31, 198t coapetitively bid or not and que8tioned it County Attorney CUyler 18 prepared (0 aake a fira stateaent on this _tter at this tlae, to whlch County Attorney Cuyler stated that he has had dl.cu.sion with Statt on the matter, but he has not personally revi~ed the original request tor proposal. He stated that 1t he is to personally check this _tter out, he will need a week to do 80. Co..issioner Shanahan stated that he feels that there are a lot of unanswered questions and it the County Attorney needs a week to revlew this _tter, he would suggest that Start be directed to put together a report and bring it back in one week. Clerk Giles stated that it it was not the Board's intent for the Marco Island taxpayers to participate in the tunding, there wll1 have to be some adjustments _de because Marco Island ls contrlbutlng $.17 at each dollar that 1s raised in this tund. County Hanager Corrill stated that County-wide sources have pro- vided tunds in support ot the Tigertall Beach Park and contlnue to do 80 and the Growth Manageaent Plan indicates that Co~~ty, Reglonal, Coaauni ty, and beach parks are of a County-wide benetit, addlng that it would be worthwhile to go back to the records and verlty thls situation. He stated that it Marco is exempt troll paying tor Kaple. related beach parks, construction and/or operation and the balance of the County has an obligation to contlnue paylng tor Tigertail on Marco Island, this determination should not be lIade at thls tilDe until there has been further research done. Co_issioner Saunders stated that the ComJDisslon did vote durlng the budget process purely on beach renourishment to exclude Marco Island troll paying tor beach renourishment within the rest ~~ the County because Marco Island was paylng tor their own beach renourish- aent. ec-1se100er Shaft.8h.an aave4, seecmðed by eo-Jeeicmer ..... and c:arrled '/0, that the SUppl~tal Agr_nt wl th Co&etl'.l KDgiD8ering for the prellalnary de.ign _rvice. for the Beach 1Iour1~t project be cont1mwd for one _It until Staff has deteraJDed 1f CO8p8tltJve hg8 20 II ._--~- """..,- - -- -- "..----.. ,,_... ~ ""-------...,, """. ""..".-. JUUAKY 31, IN' D890t:lat:ions ~ required; if there 18 8DY potential hDd.i"9 troa the Cor'p8 0 t &DQ'1 nee r.; and that Start enter into an Interlocal 8gT....nt wlt:h the Cl~ ot .&pl.. for their fair .bare contrlbut:ion of 8100,000. It- nO1 azQO:EST I'OJt PROPOSALS .-oR A COKPRDDSln U'rILITT un STt1DT TO IJICLODK 1iIA'lD .un SDD OlD rus .un STaTal DZVELOPMKJrr CB.IJtGU - ...t-RU\'1tD .un A COnt1LTAJrT SEL&cTIO. COI8CITTD APPOlrnD TO ItSVIDf AJID MAD rUAL VDDOR IUC~&JUJU'IO. TO TJR see Utilities Administrator Crandall requested approval to proceed w i th a request for proposals to firms that w11l do a rate analysis tor rates and system development charges. He stated that he would like to ask the consultant to consider water rates that encourage water .avings. adding that such a rate structure could help the County .ave water. He stated that he would also ask that the selection co..lttee be allowed to malee the final vendor recommendation to the Board, rather than the Board interviewing 2 or 3 tlrms. In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Cranda 11 stated that a per- centage of wate:- is charged based on the amount ot water that ls used, adding that there could be a sliding scale so that it aore water i. u.ed, those people pay aore and it less water is used, people pay less. He noted that there are various ways ot saving water and the rate analyst will provide the options that could be used. Co..issioner Hasse questioned it it is necessary to have a rate analyst do this. to which Mr. Crandall stated that he feel. that an independent, unbiased opinion is needed. addlng that he teels that the Clerk's office would also concur with this Idea tor audltlng purposes. Commissioner Shanahan stated that there are ite.. that need to be investigated by the Staff with regards to saving water, addlng that he feels that a rate analyst is needed to structure the rate.. CoRmissioner Saunders stated that he feels that the entire Commission wants to reduce the outside consultants as much as possible. but in dealing with rate studies the outslde unblased objec- tive review ot the rates is needed in the event that there is a challenge to the rates. Page 21 p -,,-,"'-'-"'--'--'-- "--'"-'- .. --, JARUARY 31, 198i Co881_100.er Sh.anah,an 8OV84, _ccmd84 by cc-i_1oaer ..... aDd carried 4,/0, that the r equeiI t for proposal. tor a c~~¿.b8D8i.. ati- 11~ rate study to Inclu4e water and sewer user f-- and 8T8t- deve- lO¡88Ut c~ be apprOV1HS and that a cOD8Ultant _lec1:ion CØ8811:t.. 88ðe up 0 t Tboaa8 or. Crandall, John Yonkosky, 8rian Machnsi., Mary Jo 'th11r8 ton, and Mlcb.ael A. Me.... revlew and aaJt8 tb8 final 'I"8Dðor reccrv D4atlon to the Board. It- 'lOA IJI'TDLOCAL IoOQIPUUII.a:8 øxn.&.bI COLLIn COt1JI'l'T .um CITY OJ' INDGLADU J'Oa COLLKC'fIO1I OJ' LI8UKT SYSTDI IMPACT nu .um UGIOJIAL PAB DlPACT J'D,2L!fl~I8 ~ CITY OJ' EVDOLADKS - APPROVKD County Attorney Cuyler stated that with regards to the City ot F:verglades and the Interlocal agree.ents tor the impact tees. they are identical to the ones prepared tor the City ot Naples. He stated that Everglades City has considered this matter but it was tabled to February 7, 1989. at which tim.... they are golng to reconslder it. He stated that the ordinance is ettective as of February 1, 1989. He stated that there is an alternate mechanis. that is not in the best interest ot the individual city or the County or the tee payer, whlch is that the County tracKS down the people and assesses a lien against the property. He stated that this can be done it necessary. He stated that he would suqgest that the Board approve the interlocal agreements that have not been executed by the City ot Everglades In substan t iall y the torm that is in the agenda packet, which wl11 leave hi. a little tlexibility it something arlses that 1 t w01lld have to be chanqed in some minor way. Commissioner Shanahan questioned it Everglades City is concerned with the aaount that they will be collecting and what the probl.. ls with regards to delaying this matter until February 7, 19891 County Attorney Cuyler stated that he believes that Everglades City is waiting on some intormation from thelr City Attorney about the i.pact tees and they also have some concerns about the laposltlon ot the tees as opposed to the collection ot the tees, because the County has Bo.~one available in the City ot F:verglades that aay be able 1:0 Page 22 59 - '",-.----..,..-. ,-- """",_.."-_..,..--,....,,,,,..,-- JAKUARY 31, 1989 collect t:-Je tees so that they would not have to worry about the actual collection process. He stated that he is hopeful that they "111 con- .ider and approve the two agreements as it 18 in the beat interest of everyone. ~.aloner Shc\.II\AAn 8OV8d, see0n&t4 by Co8a1.e1oner ..... aDd carrle4 ./0, that tba Interlocal agr.._nte between Collier CoaDq a:ad the Clty ot Kvwrgl8d8a tor collectlon of Library Syat.. 18P8Ct f... aDd bf¡Jlcmal Park IlIpaCt f... within the City ot IrYwrgl8d88 be ......:rov.d in 8Ub8tant1ally the fora that is 1D the 8gI8Dda ¡MICut. Page 23 $'I -' --_.~'- -"""",-"..'-".'-.-'--'- jANUARY 31, 1989 It.. #10B IJrTDLOCAL AGUDŒrl'S BETWEU COLLIER COtnrrY AIm THE CITY OJ' RAPLES FOR COLLEC'TIOI( or LIBRARY SYSTEM IMPACT FEES AIm UOIOI(AL PARI: IMPAC'T FEES _MITRI!( TH~__C.I'l'Y OFRAPLES -:AP_~9_~I)_--_------- County Attorney Cuyl~r st.1Jlt~d th.1Jlt the City of Naples has already considered and entered into this agreement, adding that the Regional Park Ilipact Fee and the Library Impact Fee are to be assessed within both the City ot Naples and the City of i'.verglades. He stated that a8 part of the impact fee ordinance there is a mechanism tor the perspec- tive cities and the County to ...nter into an inter local agreement whlch provides the City with one of two options which they can choose. He stated thilt one option is th"tt they actually collect the fee and that they retain a sm-3.1l colle-:tion fee out of that and the second option 151 that they require proof ot ..yJd..nce that the tee has been paid to the County before they i'3sue il building permit within the City ot Naples and/or the City ot Everglades. He stated that the City ot Naples has considered the agreement and they have prepared a resolu- tion along with the e~ecuted "tgreements tor the Impact fees. Coaai..loner Shanahan aoved, seconded by C088i.sloner Baa.. and carrled 4/0, that the inter local agre...nt. be~ Collier County and the City ot Kaple. tor collection ot Llbrary Sy.t.. Iapact te.. and Reglonal Park I.pact tee. within the Clty ot ..ple. be approved. Page 24 lit ,""._,"'"' '-"'----'-.'--- ,-- ..., JANUARY 31, 1989 It.. .111.1112 JJUI>q!T J.)Œ]f1)tŒJfTS 89-99/10~-=~~ED ------. Coaai..ioner Ooodnlght aoved, ..conded by Co..l..10ner Bas.. and carrled ./0, that Budget A8endaents 89-99/102 be adopted. Commissioner Shanahan ~tated that the tabulation of contracts and documents has been reduced considerably and looks much better. It.. .121. RLSOLCTIO. 89-24 REAPPOIKTIKO DR. .7A1fE POL.EOWSI:I AJI1) APPOIJrTIKO MR. .70BJr If. BOSH TO THE COLLIER COOKTY HEALTH FACILITIES AUTHORITY - AOO~ Administrative Assistant to the Board Israelson stated that on the reso¡utJon there needs to be a ~hange made. notlng that John W. Bush shows a term expiration date of December 17, 1992 which, in fact, should be January 31, 1993. Coaai..loner Bas.. aoved, ..conded by Co..i..ioner Sb"".ban and carrled 4/0, that Resolution 89-24 reappolntlng Dr. Jane PolkowaJtJ wlth an expiration date ot Deceaber 18, 1992, and appolnt1ng Hr. John N. Buah with an .xplration date ot January 31, 1993, to the Collier County Health Facll1ties Authorlty be adopted. Page 2ð lIt -- -_.. MM'_-'.--"-'--'-- JANUARY 31, 1989 It- .13A CHID' JACI: LLOYD AS PRO,nC'l' DIRECTOR FOR TBX AJfTI-DRtlO ABUSE DFORCDLùt/~gXSIOJl ~_~T'M!XT PROGRAM - APPROVED Commissioner Saunc\ers stated that: the Commission is very much interested in the Anti-Druç¡ Abuse Enforcement/Apprehension and Treatment Program and support it, Comaissioner Goodnight stated that Mr. Lloyd would do a good job in this position and que~tioned it' the-Be appointments have to be accepted by the Board of County Commissioners? County Attorney Cuyler state-d that he believes that naming this individual is simply tor grants and grant coordination purposes, Clerk Giles stated that this particular program is a type ot grant given to the County and that the County turns around and gives to the Sheriff. but it is funneled through the Board which is why they are requir'!d to approve the project director. Coaai..loner Hasse aoved, seconded by Co..i..ioner Ooodnlght and carrlttd 4/0, that Chief Jack Lloyd a. project director tor the Anti-Druq Abuse Entorce..nt/Apprehenslon and Tre.t..nt Progr.. be approved. ..... Coaai..loner Ooodnlght aoved, .econded by Coaa1..1oner Has.e and carried 4/0. that the tollow1ng ite.. under the Consent Agenda be adopted and/or approved: ..... It.. .UAI FI~_pLAT .9'. .9LEIfDEVOJl AT MY1fP~RIL - _!JgB.,!!CT._~.9_~TIJ~:t;g.~T!Q.XS 1. That the final plat not be recorded until the required impro- 'J{':nen t shave oe,..n constructed and accepted or until approved secur i ty is received for the uncompleted improvements and that construction shall be completed within 36 months of che date of this approva 1, 2. That no construction tor water management system be started until approved permits are received from SFWMD. 3. That the Utilities P('rformance Bond requlred pursuant to Ordinance 88-76 be waived (this work will be covered by main- tenance security to be provided by the Developer pursuant to Ordinance 76-r,) and that a maintenance security tor ten (10 percent of the total cost of construction of all infrastruc- ture improvements (water. !lewer, road and drainage) be pro- 'Jided on completion and prpliminary acceptance of the project by the County. for a period of one year. It- .UA2 rIXAL PLAT OF CROMK POIKTE EAST - StlB3ECT TO STIPtlLATIO.S Page 26 10 .- """-,......_--,-,,._- 3,uroARY 31, 19S5t 1. That the final plat not be r-ecor-ded untll the required lapro- ve.ents have b~en constr-ucted and accepted or until approved security is received for the uncompleted Il11provementa and that constr~ction shall be completed within 36 months ot the date of this approval. 2. That no certificates of occupancy be 18sued until a street lighting plan is submitted for- approval by the Engineer-ing Depart.ent. 3. That the Utilities Pertoraance Bond requlred pursuant to Ordinance 88-76 be waived (this work wll1 be covered by 88in- tenance security to be provided by the Developer pursuant to Ordinance 76-6) and that a aaintenance .ecurity tor ten (10) perc..nt ot the total cost ot construction ot all intrastruc- ture i.provementa (water, sewer, road and drainage) be pro- vided on completion and preli81nary acceptance ot the project by the County, tor a period ot one year. It- '14A3 rI JL\L PLAT or QO A I L CK&U PLAZA, "'It I I - St1B..nCT TO 8'1'IPW.ATlo.e 1. That the Board ot County Coaalss10ners approve the Construction and Maintenance and Escrow Agreeaent. tor Subdivision Improvements and authorize the Chalr.an to execute the BaDe. 2. That no certificates ot occupancy be lssued until a street lighting plan is submitted tor approval by the Engineerlng Department. 3. That the Utilities Pertormance Bond required pursuant to Ordinance 88-76 be waived (this work will be covered by 88in- tenance security to be provided by the Developer pursuant to Ordinance 76-6) and that a maintenance .ecurity tor ten (10) percent of the total cost ot construction ot all intrastruc- tu"e ImprovelDents (water, sewer, paving and drainage) be pro- vIded on completion and prellalnary acceptance ot the project by the County. tor a per-led ot ene year. See Pages ~9-",1- ;1.7 It- '14.1 ~u~I.IC1'IO. or VAJrDD.BILT DRIft OtrT7ALL PKO.ncr .'033 AS COMPLftIm BY CLA.DCO B0tØ8, I8C., a AOTBORID 1I~I~n or rIlfoAL PAYM.aT It- '1~1 ItDIXAL or AOJtD:MZJIT WITII QUED FOa A DAY, I8C. TO PROVIDE SDVICU u.uD OLÐU ~IC.us ACT TITLI III-8 PIWG1t.AM - RI lID 87-1208 See Pages a 9.. .8.J - B. /7 It- '14D1 $þA.'t rACILITII' AQ'Q&",~uu - TIJIQS~.QI.UB AT '~D See Pages ;),9- C. I - a.'f It- '14D2 rosc.ury AT TO VIDYAJ1W8 - 8lATD rACILITIU ACCKPTAJfCl - 8UB.1ICT TO 8'rI PVLA TI 011 1. All legal docuaents are found .utticlent by the County Attorney's ottlce. Page 27 11 ....- ' ,..__....,~._,- JAJruARY 31, 1989 See Pages OR BOOK 1414 PAGES 218 -231 It- el~l PA8111U.1IC J.l:JtiC4aDICAL STUDBY COVDAOK rea CI'rIZDS ATTDDI.O 'fD "Y~f"&l)U BUrOQD FESTIVAL O. l'DROARY 4, I &, 1 fl89 AT If<) C1tAJUn It- .1.11 J(I~ ~POJro~ - FILEt) UD/oa ItD"D:JtKD There being no objection, the Chair directed that the following aiscellaneous correspondence be tlled and/or referred to the varlou. departaents as Indicated below: 1. Letter dated 01/16/89 from Blg Corkscrew Island Flre Control & Re8cue Distrlct to Jay Reardon, !aergency Services Adainistrator. re Contract tor Collier County HSTU Flre Control District. Referred to Ken Cuyler: BCC: and t 1led. 2. Letter dated 01/17/89 to BCC Chalrman from Robert X. Lotlin, Environmental Specialist, DER, re Colller County - WRR, F1le "0. 111593175, Malntenance Dredge Clam Pass. Reterred to Xell Dorr 111. George Archibald, and t 1led. 3. Letter dated 01/09/89 to BCC Chalraan froB Robert X. Lotlln, Envlronaental Speclali.t, DER, re Collier County - WRR, File "0. 111590065. Hlckory Wigglns, Ltd. Reterred to "eil Dorr 111. George Archibald, and Bill Lorenz. "'. Letter dated 01/20/89 to BCC Chalraan trom Robert K. Lotlln, Environmental Specialist. DER, re Collier County - WRR, r1le Ho. 111595035, Kllnger, Rlchard. Reterred to Heil Dorrll1, George Archlbald. Tom Ollift, and t 11ed. 5. "otice of Publlc DER Workshop dated 01/20/89, tor a d18cusslon ot proposed solid waste rule., 01/31/89, dealing wlth the dlsposal ot incinerator ash from colid wa.te manageaent tacl- li'.~ell. Reterred to Heil Dorrill, Bob Fahey, George Archlbald and t 1led. 6. Copy of Permlt Humber A CQ-183 (Somerset Corp. ot Harco) to BCC troa Altred 8. Devereaux, Jr., Chlef Bureau ot Coa.tal Engineering and Regulation. DHR. Reterred to Toa Ollitt, Bill Lorenz and tiled. 7. Hinutes Received and Piled: A. CCPC Orowth Hanagea~nt Plan Publlc Hearlng Mlnutes ot 12/22/88. B. Library Advisory Board Hinutes ot 12/08/88. C. Harco Island Beautiticatlon Hlnutes ot 12/06/88 and 01/03/89. D. Parks & Recreation Advlsory Board Agenda tor 01/26/89. E. Pocket ot Poverty Review Co..lttee Heeting Agenda tor 02/06/89 and Mlnutes ot 01/10/89. F. Pocket ot Poverty Review Committee Heetlng Agenda tor 01/30/89 and Minutes ot 01/16/89. 8. Notlce ot Hearing 2/21/89 re Case No. 88-241~-CA-Ol. Cros.land Savings, PSB, Plalntitt VB. Arthur H. Roberts. et aI, Dt'tend.ants. Reterred to Ken Cuyler and tiled. Page 28 1}' '-"-" ' "..'"' ,..,,---."'.--"'-- .. . --... --'--- ".-- JANUARY 31, 1989 9. Notice ot Hearing 1/22-24/89 troa Public Servlce Co..iasion re Mo. 890001-EI. Fuel and Purchased Power Coat Recovery Clause with Generating Pertor.ance Incentive Factor, Docket No. 890002-EG. Conservation Cos~ Recovery Clause, Docket Ro. 890003-0U. Purchased Gas Cost Recovery Clause. Issued 01/12/89. Filed. 10. Heao dated 01/20/89 froa Ottice ot Co.ptroller, State ot Florida. George Haynie, Director. Division ot Accountlng & Audlting re Pari-Mutuel Dlstrlbutions. Reterred to Joe Warren with Check and Filed. 11. Letter dated 1/17/89 from Sewell, Todd" Broston. Inc., insurance adjusters. to BCC Chair.an re File Nuaber 8286ð-O68. Clai.ant Jerome Berg.ann with Kon-Waiver Agreeaent attached. Referred to Heil Dorrill, Leo Ochs. Sherry Rynders. Ken Cuyler (with original documents) and t lled. ..... There belng no further buslness tor the Oood ot the County, the aeeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Ti.e: 11:20 A.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZOHIRO APPEALS/EX OFFICIO OOVERRIRO BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL ~ß BURT L. SAOHDIRS, C HA I RMAJf ATTEST: JAMES, C~.,UbES.' CLERK ~~~~ Dc .: The.. ainutes approved by the Board on-?-~J 02¿ / '?/;"? a.'.presented ~ or as corrected Page 29 1! _."~.._-,,,."--""_.."-,~,,"'..-