Loading...
Agenda 03/25/2014 Item # 9A 3/25/2014 9.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recomendation to approve a Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and 05-52, the Quail II Planned Unit Development (PUD), to allow 87 single-family detached,attached and zero lot line units or 152 multi-family dwelling units as permitted uses in the Residential (R-1) District by providing for: Section One,Amendments to Cover Page; Section Two, Amendments to the Table of Contents/Exhibits page; Section Three, Amendment to Statement of Compliance section; Section Four, Amendments to Project Description section; Section Five, Amendments to Permitted Uses and Development Standards section including a revised legal description and removal of requirement to contribute to affordable housing trust fund for units developed in R-1 District; providing for addition of Deviations; Section Six, Amendments to Exhibit A, the PUD Master Plan and Addition of Exhibit B, R-1 District Master Plan, Exhibit C, Sidewalk Exhibit, Exhibit D, Turn Lane Detail; and Section Seven, Effective Date. The subject property is located north of Immokalee Road and east of Valewood Drive in Section 20, Township 48 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida. (PUDZ-A-PL20090001891) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) review staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding the petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The petitioner proposes to amend Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and 05- 52, the Quail 11 PUD Planned Unit Development (PUD) (see Attachments), to allow 87 single- family detached, attached and zero lot line dwelling units as an alternative to the currently approved 152 multi-family dwelling units as permitted uses in the Residential (R-l)District. The following related amendments are proposed to the PUD Ordinance: - Section One, amendments to the Cover Page; - Section Two, amendments to the Table of Contents/Exhibits Page; - Section Three, amendment to Statement of Compliance section; - Section Four, amendments to Project Description section; - Section Five, amendments to Permitted Uses and Development Standards section including a revised legal description and removal of requirement to contribute to affordable housing trust fund for units developed in R-1 District; providing for addition of Deviations; - Section Six, amendments to Exhibit A, the PUD Master Plan and addition of Exhibit B, R-1 District Master Plan; - Section Seven, Effective Date. FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD amendment by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD amendment is approved, a portion of the land could be developed and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. Packet Page-14- 3/25/2014 9.A. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP)IMPACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed rezone consistent with the Future Land Use Element. A more detailed description of the GMP consistency is contained in the Staff Report. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition PUDZ-A-PL200090001891, Quail II Planned Unit Development (PUD) on February 6, 2014, and by a vote of 7 to 0 recommended to forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval subject to the following stipulations which have been incorporated into the PUD document: 1. The lake maintenance agreement and 12 percent cost shall be clarified as proposed by Longshore Lakes representatives with additional language added by applicant. 2. There shall be no mix of product; the project will be all single-family or multi-family residential. 3. Executive Drive shall be the construction entrance for all parcel site work until 75 percent of the platted project lots receive Certificates of Occupancy. 4. A deceleration lane shall be provided on Valewood Drive without requiring compensating right-of-way as per the Turn Lane Exhibit. 5. If a structure is built in the amenity area, the rear side of the structure will face the wall and the activity side will face Valewood Drive. The hours of operation will be from dawn until to dusk and there will be no amplified sound. The structure setback is 30 feet. Lighting will be bollard type lighting or no greater than 12-foot height, limited to that required by code or for security purposes, and shielded from adjoining properties. 6. Sidewalks are allowed on one side of the road only if the project is developed as a single- family product. 7. The Applicant shall allow the wall to remain where it is unless it is rebuilt. The Applicant shall also allow access and maintenance over the existing and remaining easement outside of the landscape buffer provided that the easement holder, if the easement is exclusive, does not object to the use of their easement for these additional purposes. 8. The Sidewalk Exhibit shall be added to the PUD document. Packet Page -15- 3/25/2014 9.A. 9. The Turn Lane Exhibit shall be added to PUD document and shall be subject to final permitting adjustments. 10. If there any conflicts with the turn lane location, access easements will be created for Collier County. Letters of objection have been received. Therefore, this petition has been placed on the Regular Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is an amendment to the existing Quail II PUD Planned Unit Amendment (Ordinance Nos. 92-41 and 05-52, as amended). The burden falls upon the applicant for the amendment to prove that the proposal is consistent with all of the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denial, that such denial is not arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the amendment does not meet one or more of the listed criteria. Criteria for PUD Amendments Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development(as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Packet Page-16- 3/25/2014 9.A. 8. Consider: Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed PUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested PUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a"core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Packet Page-17- 3/25/2014 9.A. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety. and welfare? The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC and further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for PUDZ-A- PL20090001891, Quail II Planned Unit Development (PUD) subject to the CCPC stipulations. Prepared by: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA Planning & Zoning Attachments: 1) Staff Report 2) Proposed Ordinance 3) Ordinance Number 05-52 4) Ordinance Number 92-41 5) Location Map 6) Master Plan 7) Letters of Objection 8) Application- go to: httn://www.colliereov.net/ftp/AuendaMar2514/GrotivthMamt/ApplicationforOuail lI Pt_ DA.pdf Packet Page-18- 3/25/2014 9.A. COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.9.A. Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and 05-52,the Quail II Planned Unit Development (PUD),to allow 87 single-family detached, attached and zero lot line units or 152 multi-family dwelling units as permitted uses in the Residential (R-1) District by providing for: Section One, Amendments to Cover Page; Section Two, Amendments to the Table of Contents/Exhibits page; Section Three, Amendment to Statement of Compliance section; Section Four, Amendments to Project Description section; Section Five, Amendments to Permitted Uses and Development Standards section including a revised legal description and removal of requirement to contribute to affordable housing trust fund for units developed in R- 1 District; providing for addition of Deviations; Section Six, Amendments to Exhibit A, the PUD Master Plan and Addition of Exhibit B, R-1 District Master Plan, Exhibit C, Sidewalk Exhibit, Exhibit D,Turn Lane Detail; and Section Seven, Effective Date.The subject property is located north of Immokalee Road and east of Valewood Drive in Section 20,Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (PUDZ-A-PL20090001891) Meeting Date: 3/25/2014 Prepared By Name: GundlachNancy Title: Planner, Principal, Comprehensive Planning 2/25/2014 3:24:35 PM Submitted by Title: Planner, Principal, Comprehensive Planning Name: GundlachNancy 2/25/2014 3:24:36 PM Approved By Name: PuigJudy Packet Page-19- 3/25/2014 9.A. Title: Operations Analyst, Community Development&Environmental Services Date: 2/25/2014 4:23:08 PM Name: BellowsRay Title: Manager-Planning, Comprehensive Planning Date: 2/26/2014 8:44:06 AM Name: BosiMichael Title: Director-Planning and Zoning, Comprehensive Planning Date: 2/27/2014 11:01:03 AM Name: AshtonHeidi Title: Managing Assistant County Attorney, CAO Land Use/Transportation Date: 2/27/2014 11:22:39 AM Name: MarcellaJeanne Title: Executive Secretary, Transportation Planning Date: 2/28/2014 2:25:11 PM Name: k.latzko«Jeff Title: County Attorney, Date: 2/28/2014 3:43:41 PM Name: IsacksonMarh Title: Director-Corp Financial and Mngmt Svs, Office of Management&Budget Date: 3/13/2014 9:57:44 AM Name: OchsLeo Title: County Manager, County Managers Office Date: 3/14/2014 2:57:09 PM Packet Page-20- 3/25/2014 9.A. AGENDA ITEM 9-A Co w County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING &ZONING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION, PLANNING AND REGULATION HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2014 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL2009-1891, QUAIL II PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) APPLICANT/OWNER: CONTRACT PURCHASER: Westbury Quail Gardens, LLC Toll FL III Limited Partnership 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 402 250 Gibraltar Road Naples, FL 34103 Horsham, PA 19044 * Please note: this amendment is being bought forward by the Applicant/Property Owner of Tract R-1. There are other numerous property owners within the Quail II PUD. AGENTS: Mr. D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Mr. Richard D. Yovanovich Q. Grady Minor & Associates Goodlette, Coleman and Johnson, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Naples,FL 34103 REOUESTED ACTION: The Quail II PUD currently allows 152 multi-family dwelling units as a permitted use in the Residential (R-1) District within the Quail II PUD. The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an amendment to the Quail II PUD to allow 87 single- family detached, attached and zero lot line dwelling units or 152 multi-family dwelling units as permitted uses in the Residential (R-1) District within the Quail II PUD. PUDZ-A-PL2009-1891,QUAIL II PUD January 28,2014 Page 1 of 16 Packet Page-21- 3/25/2014 9.A. - ` ���--10 �4 : � �4 ( o Miry 14� - _ L pi— i.1111 NI. e `;� ! ,: v4., .∎ *- S IC = = Q 1111!/ R® p E i 9R O E ESi°¢ i i it t; N 5 I e : WW®a� --nc, r 1m wdg I 10 �S l —8 r� f p R 8 'd 5n 1 S o, ,... I a' I> . —J 3 / g a — ,� I l I c. o 9 __.r c zE i LE- k-g — r'mL ty u ¢ d N 3-ns a Lox / 7 0 a. 4t um —1 0 O,111111111.111,. ii�riib3� I 2 OWn3in09 tl3lt ioo ISS'b'D 17 E ms W w 7 V . 1.071 0 _ 0 �' xvnorma lii!I' s,. VJZ '! '5 ' '?': '\7.- II Mil '' 11.17.1:1 1,,,,,,,rw: 1,1701-4 ROAD '"'""'...""..M'n"'"'n.b..; ol...1 ti 75 ,r,, b� x9 g s� lac 12k1 m EMI ® 1IiiT Packet Page-22- QUAIL CREEK ESTATES 3/25/2014 9.A. AND COUNTRY CLUB ( PUD ). • • :"---T17,1 / .• ,...:111211....] z 0 1 we .fir g N o o w HUNTINGTON 3 LONGSHORE LAKES 6, LAKE ( PUD ) R• I ( PUD ) • s t ~Z O V kg r LL x LL 1 l \ / 5 r m l7 ; •�W . 15'BUFFER MAY BE REDUCED TO 10'IF DEVELOPED IMTH SINGLE FAMILY HOMES m i W re t 0 LL x o m= i t ' T idg r n L, Vines&Associates,Inc.. LandPianner Va Arthur l-tis&Associates,Inc. Golf Course Architects W g COMMERCIAL t-1 Wilson Miller Inc, W ° . • COMMERCIAL EXHIBIT 'A' 106'CANAL RIGHT OF WAY .v •riee"..'_: 74t.Ol9.c:iif•Vt , GOLDEN GATE ESTATES QUAIL II — PUD MASTER PLAN FOR MULTI-FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY 2 A Portion of Sectie• 9n Tsar,, At c Rge. 25 E 1-.2 Packet Page-23- 3/25/2014 9.A. MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY / / '/ // r FOR R-1 DISTRICT: UP TO 152 MULTI-FAMILY OR 87 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS (INCLUDES ATTACHED, / DETACHED, ZERO LOT LINE, TWO-FAMILY ATTACHED AND DUPLEX) AS DESCRIBED IN QUAIL II PUD ORDINANCE, / / / SECTION 3.4. �/ / / , / /,/ *15'BUFFER MAY BE REDUCED TO 10'IF DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. , / / DEVIATIONS //,/ al SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02,"BUFFER REQUIREMENTS",WHICH REQUIRES A i / ///// AMENITY 15-FOOT WIDE TYPE'B'BUFFER BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES TO PERMIT A / -' 1 I AREA 10-FOOT WIDE TYPE'B'BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTHERN PROJECT BOUNDARY. A / � SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SUBSECTION 6.06,02.A,"SIDEWALKS. BIKE LANE . \ AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS", WHICH REQUIRES SIDEWALKS TO BE /. / I CONSTRUCTED ON BOTH SIDES OF LOCAL STREETS,TO ALLOW SIDEWALKS, ,,�`� \ 5-FOOT IN WIDTH, ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET ONLY FOR PRIVATE i vY� I STREETS. �� / Av J SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SUBSECTION / / -j `2�� ) ■6.06.01.N, "STREET SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS" / - / AND"APPENDIX B",TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS / 7 AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DESIGN STANDARDS, i/ �\ \ WHICH ESTABLISHES A 60-FOOT WIDE LOCAL / : i� ROAD TO ALLOW A MINIMUM 50-FOOT WIDE/Z.'''. ' - / i I w PRIVATE ROAD.(PREVIOUSLY APPROVED) // / / I o / H / 7 ' Z QUAIL CREEK // / 3''\ I-,3I o j ESTATES AND // / 15'TYPE'B' BUFFER--- I� 01 a COUNTRY CLUB / / ',. ,W/6'-8'NIGH WALL* \ 15'TYPE'B'BL FF R * x (PUD) / / . `-- i W/6 -8 HIGH WALL W �/ / ; / / I I (EXISTING WALL�TO >... Q / // �/ / REMAIN)/ �/;`�/ 2t74 C.± < o o / L_ - - r /. i 1 z /' 1 — — — '�_ { L� , f I 1 { 1 l -3 { I 1 0'TYPE'B' BUFFER I '2 1�_'1 I I 1 I W/6' 8' HIGH WALL 1 1 I 1,11. I I r? I I ; COMMERCIAL PROPER+IES 1 al I _ _I of _ I _ Li,, _—' - - - - _ I I ( I I I I I 1 I �l 1 N I I I ' 1 i1 H 11 - - - - - -- - , 1 ii I COCOHATCHEE CANAL I I Jt --- --- —(looe R/W) --- -- ( I 0 100• 200' S - - - -- IMMOKALEE ROAD —i-`. SCALE: 1"=200' QUAIL II PUD SCALE,` f•,.rnJ,4,,ur ni„I JOB cook z II Grad��P�rlinor ++�•������,, ,aP�00 011%la'e a 113+ CXHBIT ' B' °"'E MG m„(RD/1)+Civil Engineers Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects R 1 DIS TRICT : raimeorn.KR annssr r<,+.I At..+a rcx6+53 x,Km.:s iczr,+xx+aac MASTER PLAN MOW B-P° Bonita Spr+nE.a.239.947.1144 wn 9•-l;r.r0141ir+or.rnm Fort Byers-_39.6904300 SHEET 1 OF 1 i ti Packet Page -24- 3/25/2014 9.A. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The existing Quail II PUD, consisting of 194.34± acres, is located on the north side of Immokalee Road (C.R. 846), approximately 1/2 mile east of Interstate 75, in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 26 East. (See the location map and the PUD Master Plans on the preceding pages.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner proposes to amend Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and 05-52, the Quail II PUD Planned Unit Development (PUD) (see Attachment B), to allow 87 single-family detached, attached and zero lot line dwelling units as an alternative to the currently approved 152 multi-family dwelling units as permitted uses in the Residential (R-1) District. The following related amendments are proposed to the PUD Ordinance: - Section One, amendments to the Cover Page; - Section Two, amendments to the Table of Contents/Exhibits Page; - Section Three, amendment to Statement of Compliance Section - Section Four, amendments to Project Description section; - Section Five, amendments to Permitted Uses and Development Standards section including a revised legal description and removal of requirement to contribute to affordable housing trust fund for units developed in R-1 District;providing for addition of Deviations; - Section Six, Amendments to Exhibit A, the PUD Master Plan and Addition of Exhibit B, R-1 District Master Plan; - Section Seven, Effective Date SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING (of Tract R-1): North: Quail II PUD, developed residential golf course portion approved at 2.6 units per acre, with a zoning designation of PUD (Quail II PUD Ordinance number 05-52) East: Longshore Lake, a developed single-family residential PUD approved at 1.77 units per acre, with a zoning designation of PUD (Longshore Lake PUD Ordinance Number 93-3) South: Quail II PUD, developed commercial portion and vacant lots with a zoning designation of PUD (Quail II PUD Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and 05-52), Immokalee Road and then Estates (E) zoning West: Huntington Lakes, a developed multi-family residential PUD approved at 5.4 units per acre, with a zoning designation of PUD (Huntington PUD Ordinance Number 94-38) PUDZ-A-PL2009-1891,QUAIL H PUD January 28,2014 Page 5 of 16 Packet Page-25- 3/25/2014 9.A. s , , SJNC4.01.7c,E*AY$t- §, ' a .v 2,. ._R., ran 4 fir"" .* - �' t " §'4. "' y� %MC,y.i0. t A $iq.. I fiACN - Y" xs E *r r JM_a4 T..*4....,"., ,,.." -,.. ,..-. , '' 1 i ' AIW, g�ai inY'�•t� I' wC via Z` 'r7�: W ' a t.,_ 344*4.*9 .R..:,..,h �-$ + .*, */ 7,'^'$yap, 4,... W x{y�� 1} `ii-'' - Yt' Y ,n M 'S 6F t ••,r 1 �'1 � ! �< "fie , � ., � .§'S.�„i a °�3 .A? ,��.�., � .,�ror, r a,. _n tiara �' D J�' « , °: ''' 5 4ry s. ° ° f t �� i,; 5 +m 4110, ;, y t.- � �� � t E>v �r �. .,r . . r� � Subject PUD �� � txh��; ` 1 x * 1 vi:-- ream s ,f a. J e4 , **' i i i i t ,, e.... b Q00 - i , ` 'I D iu - #'4 r 1 J 4ru4+'44 4t A S 4 k!,,l FDs.. �`, 4 r. s ,-' ,t , „4 •",,,I,3 ,A" � r v ,{'t y'i, K rya, vs `; ,ir' ,i ,.k a e $ Subject Site- i i i 84, ,, ia+ — yr, 4 k4-at� _ = o., ,n "I TZ 6 .2' [t *'Del " .4 4 ' r X. A Aerial Photo GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element: The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban — Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) and a portion of the site is within a residential density band, as identified on the countywide Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Within this designation, and in accordance with the Density Rating System provisions of the FLUE, a base density of four (4) dwelling units per acre (DU/A) is allowed for the non-commercial portion of the PUD (181.59 acres) as well as 3 DU/A bonus density for that non-commercial portion within the residential density band. The existing Quail II PUD allows a maximum of 512 dwelling units, a gross density of 2.8 DU/A (Ordinance Number 05-52 erroneously states 2.6 DU/A). The Quail II PUD was originally approved in 1982, and substantially amended on June 16, 1992 by Ordinance Number 92-41, and deemed consistent with the GMP. It was subsequently amended on October II, 2005 through Ordinance Number 05-52 to: convert ±21.74 acres of commercial PUDZ-A-PL2009-1891, QUAIL II PUD January 28,2014 Page 6 of 16 Packet Page-26- 3/25/2014 9.A. property to residential, rename this new tract "Residential R-1 District;" and add 152 residential multi-family dwelling units at a density of 7 DU/A on this R-1 tract. The remaining 12.75 acres of commercial were deemed"consistent by policy." Relevant to this petition, the proposed amendment seeks to allow a maximum of 87 single-family within the R-1 District of the PUD, which yields a maximum of 4 DU/A as an alternative to the 152 multi-family units presently allowed. In accordance with the proposed PUD document, single- family dwelling units would consist of detached, zero lot line, and two-family and duplex units. FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with the surrounding area. Please refer to the Zoning Review section of this Staff Report for this analysis. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period. Therefore, the subject application can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan(GMP). Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the PUD documents. The petition is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the GMP. GMP Conclusion: Based upon the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed rezone consistent with the Future Land Use Element(FLUE). ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5, Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection, 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Services staff has reviewed the petition to address any environmental concerns. The proposed changes do not affect any of the environmental requirements of the GMP or LDC (Land Development Code). An EAC (Environmental Advisory Council) review is not required in accordance with Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Transportation Review: Transportation Department staff has reviewed the petition and has recom- mended approval of the amendment. PUDZ-A-PL2009-1891,QUAIL H PUD January 28,2014 Page 7 of 16 Packet Page-27- 3/25/2014 9.A. Utility Review: The Utilities Department Staff has reviewed the petition and has the following comments. According to the current 2008 Water and Wastewater Master Plan Updates, the project location is within the Collier County Water - Sewer District Service Area. At the time of the Site Development Plan (SDP), this project is subject to the conditions associated with a Water and Sewer Availability Letter from the Collier County Public Utilities Division. Zoning Review: The proposed PUD amendment will allow additional land uses to the R-1 District in the Quail II PUD. There was an amendment approved in 2005 to allow 152 multi-family du'ellin,' units. The current amendment proposes to allow 87 single-family dwelling units or 152 multi-family dwelling units in the R-1 District. The maximum number of dwelling units allowed within the Quail II PUD will remain at 512 dwelling units and the density has been corrected from 2.6 units per acre to 2.8 units per acre. (Ordinance 05-52 erroneously states 2.6 dwelling units per acre). Much of the commercial and residential properties that surround the R-1 district have been developed. The R-1 district is currently a cleared 21.74± acre parcel of land that is surrounded by an existing 6 to ii-foot height wall. As illustrated in the aerial photograph located on page 6 of this Staff Report, the subject R-1 District parcel is bounded to the north by Valewood Drive and then golf course areas within the Quail II PUD, to the east by single-family residences of Longshore Lake. to the south by developed and vacant commercial parcels of Quail Il PUD, and to the west by Valewood Drive and then multi-family residences of Quail II PUD. The setbacks are measured from the R-1 tract boundaries. The single-family development proposes a 30-Lint setback from the Longshore Lake development, a 15-foot setback from the commercial development to the south and a 20-foot setback from Valewood Drive. The multi- family develo::inent proposes a 50-foot setback from the Longshore Lake development, a 20-foot setback from the commercial development to the south and a 50-foot setback from Valewood Drive. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed maximum zoned building height of 35 feet and 2-stories is comparable to the maximum height limits approved for abutting properties which are 35 feet for Huntington 'IUD and 2-stories for Longshore Lake PUD,respectively. FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surroundinm if uses. Zoning staff is of the opinion that this project will be compatible with and complementary In.. the surrounding land uses. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the followina v en applicable." (Staffs responses to these criteria are provided in non-bold font): PUDZ_A_PL2000-1891, QUAIL II PUD January 28,2014 Page 8 of 16 Packet Page-28- 3/25/2014 9.A. 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning Section has indicated that the proposed PUD amendment is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Play. (GMP). 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning"portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as residential and commercial. There is residential zoning to the north, east and the west; to the south, it is commercial. The uses proposed in this petition should not create incompatibility issues. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed PUD amendment would not create an isolated zoning district because the subject property is already zoned PUD. Additionally, the zoning boundary mirrors the existing property ownership boundary. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed district boundaries are logically drawn. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, but the proposed rezoning appears to be appropriate for this location based upon the site's FLUE designation. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed change, with the commitments made by the applicant, is consistent with the County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Therefore, the proposed change should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time. This project was evaluated for GMP consistency as shown in that section of this Staff Report. In PUDZ-A-PL2009-1891, QUAIL I! PUD January 28,2014 Page 9 of 16 Packet Page -29- 3/25/2014 9.A. addition, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed change should not create drainage or surface water problems because the LDC specifically addresses prerequisite development standards that are designed to reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. Any proposed water management and drainage system will need to be designed to prevent drainage problems on site and be compatible with thie adiacent water management systems. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. If this petition were approved, any subsequent development would need to comply with the applicable LDC standards for development or as outlined in the PUD document. This project's property development regulations would encourage compact development thus the developed project should not significantly reduce light and air to adjacent areas; thus the development proposed, if approved, should not negatively affect light and air perineatien into adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; r however zoning by itself may or may not infect values, since ,a_ue de:errnin:ti -n is driven by market value. There is no guarantee that the project will be marketed d a manner'.;r com pa'able to the surrounding developments. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the ,mp:ea c ;neat e deeeleptrent of adjacent property in accordance with yi it t r•F quiations. Properties around this property are already mostly developed. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the Land Development (2t-olc is that sound application. when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process. gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zonlng chance should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent prop ries. 12. Whether the proposed change will cansti(ute a grant c , .m. .,. ! privilege to a individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed development complies with the Growth Manaeemcnt Plan which is a public policy statement supporting Zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not _ u_utc a arant of :p:. iali ponder . Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because consistent with plans are in the public interest. PUDZ-A-PL2009-1891, QUAIL II PUD January 28,2014 a aae 10 of 16 Packet Page -30- 3/25/2014 9.A. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The property already has a PUD zoning designation and could be developed within the parameters of that zoning ordinance; however, the petitioner is seeking this amendment in compliance with LDC provisions for such amendments. The petition can be evaluated and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff believes the proposed rezone meets the intent of the PUD district and further, believes the public interest will be maintained. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. As noted previously, the R-1 Tract boundary is within the existing PUD zoning and property ownership boundary. The GMP is a policy statement which has evaluated the scale, density and intensity of land uses deemed to be acceptable throughout the urban-designated areas of Collier County. Staff is of the opinion that the development standards and the developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a PUD amendment. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require site alteration and this project will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as it may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD document. PUDZ-A-PL2009-1891,QUAIL II PUD January 28,2014 Page 11 of 16 Packet Page-31- 3/25/2014 9.A. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.1 3.B.5 states that, "in support of its recommendation, the Planning Commission shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:" 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The abutting tracts are developed with residential and commercial development. The proposed uses in this project are compatible with those uses. The development is located on Valewood Drive with a portion of development on Executive Lane, a local roadway, with access to Immokalee Road. a principal arterial roadway. The project would also be required to comply with County regulations regarding drainage, sewer, water and other utilities. Therefore, the site is suitable for the proposed development. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the developments will be required to gain platting and/or site development approval. Both processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and policies of the GMP. County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. PUDZ-A-PL2009-1891, QUAIL II PUD January 28,2014 Page 12 of 15 Packet Page-32- 3/25/2014 9.A. The development standards, landscaping and buffering requirements contained in this petition are designed to make the proposed uses compatible with the adjacent uses. The staff analysis contained in other portions of this staff report support a finding that the uses proposed in this petition will be compatible, both internally and externally. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The existing open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities,both public and private. Currently, the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. In addition, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. This PUD amendment will not adversely change the previous BCC findings that the subject property and surrounding areas can accommodate expansion. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The petitioner is seeking three deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06 A). This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff believes that the three deviations proposed can be supported, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that "the elements may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviations are "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Please refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report below for a more extensive examination of the deviations. Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking three deviations from general LDC requirements and has provided justification in support of the deviations. Staff has analyzed the deviation requests and provides the analysis and recommendations below: PUDZ-A-PL2009-1891, QUAIL II PUD January 28,2014 Page 13 of 16 Packet Page-33- 3/25/2014 9.A. Deviation # 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, "Buffer Requirements," which requires a 15-foot wide Type `B' buffer between residential and commercial uses to permit a 10-foot wide Type `B' buffer along the southern project boundary. Petitioner's Rationale: The wall and buffer are existing. The presence of the wall will provide ample screening and buffering from the adjacent future low intensity commercial uses. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends approval finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation # 2 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.02.A, "Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements," which requires sidewalks to be constructed on both sides of local streets, to allow sidewalks, 5-foot in width, on one side of the street only for private streets. Petitioner's Rationale: This deviation is proposed to apply only for development of single family homes. It is justified in this PUD due to the limited number of single family units authorized to be constructed within the amended portion of the PUD. The infill project will have a gated entry and the internal streets are private. There is also underground infrastructure in place on the site that the developer intends to utilize, which would pose conflicts for a sidewalk on both sides of the street. Underground utility facilities have been constructed in locations that causes the road (inclusive of asphaltic pavement, curb,base course, subgrade and embankment)to be off-set from the centerline of the road right-of-way. This off-set pavement section is required to allow existing pressure utility mains to be ultimately located in the shoulder of the road and not under the pavement and structural pavement base. Not only is locating pressure mains in the shoulders good engineering practice it is also required by the Collier County Utility Ordinance. By placing the road off-set from the center line of the road right-of-way a sidewalk along the off-set side, to meet clear zone requirements, would be located outside the road right-of-way and even if placed in an easement would increase the front setbacks to thirty (30) feet after applying the twenty-three (23) foot garage to sidewalk requirement. This setback would cause almost all the lots on the setback side to become unbuildable. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends approval finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation # 3 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.01.N, "Street System Requirements" and "Appendix B, Typical Street Sections and Right-of-Way Design Standards," which establishes a 60-foot wide local road to allow a minimum 50-foot wide private road. PUDZ-A-PL2009-1891,QUAIL II PUD January 28,2014 Page 14 of 16 Packet Page -34- 3/25/2014 9.A. Petitioner's Rationale: This deviation was previously approved for the PUD and will allow the developer to provide all required infrastructure within a combination of dedicated right-of-way and easements. All roadways are intended to be private and in a gated community. Staff Analysis and ReCOminendaiwwn: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends approval finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of;_ucli regulations." NEIGHBORJIOOD INFORMATION MEETING IINIM): The applicant duly noticed and held the required meeting on November 5. 2013 at 5:30 p. n. at the Saint Monica's Church 7070 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida. Approximately 65 people and the applicant, agent and County Staff attended the meeting. For further information, please refer to Attachment B: Transcript of the NIM. Letters of Objection have been received. Please refer to Attachment D. COUNTY ATTORNEY I'ORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for Petition PUDZ-A-PL2009-1891, revised on January 21, 2014. -HFAC RECOMMENDATION: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission fomar1 Petition PLDZ-A-PL2009-1891 to the Board of County Commissioners wrth a recommendation of approval of this amendment. Attachments: Attachment A: Proposed Ordinance Attachment B: Ordinance Number 05-52 Attac uneni l til l script of the Neighborhood Information Mecti m (NM) Attachment Attaehment Letters of Objection PUDZ-A-PL2009-1 8 1, ,. '•,iL I!POD January 28, 2014 Page 15 of 16 Packet Page-35- 3/25/2014 9.A. PREPARED HY: • V1,A/Li' t.4 (11,1\Aia Vil iry ),/,• , ; 0: NANCY GIII4DL.(kCp, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER 1)11ATE 1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION REVIEWED BY: ■, RAYMOND•V. BELLOWS. ZONING Mf.NA 1:77R DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION • • . . MICHAEL BOSI AICP, D=c7OR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION APPROVED EY: NICK CivE-',ALANGUIDA, ADKNISTRATOR DATE 711 AN PUDZ-A-PL2009-1891, QUAIL Ii PUD January 10,2013 Page 16 of IS Packet Page -36- 3/25/2014 9.A. ORDINANCE NO. 14- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBERS 92-41 AND 05-52, THE QUAIL H PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), TO ALLOW 87 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, ATTACHED AND ZERO LOT LINE UNITS OR 152 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS AS PERMITTED USES IN THE RESIDENTIAL (R-1) DISTRICT BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, AMENDMENTS TO COVER PAGE; SECTION TWO, AMENDMENTS TO THE TABLE OF CONTENTS/EXHIBITS PAGE; SECTION THREE, AMENDMENT TO STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION; SECTION FOUR, AMENDMENTS TO PROJECT DESCRIPTION SECTION; SECTION FIVE, AMENDMENTS TO PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION INCLUDING A REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND REMOVAL OF REQUIREMENT TO CONTRIBUTE TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND FOR UNITS DEVELOPED IN R-1 DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR ADDITION OF DEVIATIONS; SECTION SIX, AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT A, THE PUD MASTER PLAN AND ADDITION OF EXHIBIT B, R-1 DISTRICT MASTER PLAN, EXHIBIT C, SIDEWALK EXHIBIT, EXHIBIT D, TURN LANE DETAIL; AND SECTION SEVEN, EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND EAST OF VALEWOOD DRIVE IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. IPUDZ-A-PL200900018911 WHEREAS, on June 16, 1992.the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 92-41, which changed the zoning classification of the described property to Quail II PUD; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2005, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 05-52, which created the Residential R-1 District and changed a tract designation from commercial to multi-family residential for Quail II PL1D, and partially repealed Ordinance Number 92-41; and WHEREAS, Westbury Quail Gardens, LLC, represented by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP. of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the Quail II PUD (Ordinance Number 05-52). Quail 11 PUDrPUDZ-A-PL20090001891 Rev.2'21'14 Page 1 of 13 Words underlined are additions;words: #lhrot. are deletions Packet Page -37- 3/25/2014 9.A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. that: SECTION ONE: Amendments to Corer Page of the PUD Document Attached to Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and 05-52, the Quail II PUD. The Cover Pace of the PUD Document previously attached as Exhibit "A" to Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and05-52, the Quail II PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: QUAIL II A Planned unit Development PREPARED BY: WILSON MILLER, INC. WILSON PROFESSIONAL CENTER 32 BAILEY LANE, SUITE 200 NAPLES_ FL 34105 REVISED BY: D. WAYNE ARNOLD. AICP 0. GRADY MINOR AND ASSOCIATES. PA 3800 VIA DEL REY. BONITA SPRINGS. FLORIDA 4134 RICI LARD D. YOVANOVICH. ESOt IRE COLEMAN. YOVANOVICI-I & KOES ER _f!(1 T MInM TRAIL N r'E .� P t R �,� 3t1 E lh �i�:i:� 1 .>,._ STE. ,(1�). N.,tIF�S Ft ,-; ( 1 REVISED JULY 2013 Date Reviewed by CCPC: Appr'oa ed by BCC: Oriinanc',: No. .. )r n,3•rr2 is tC Repeals: EX11113IT "A" Quail 11 PEI))PUDZ-A-I'L.200900)1891 Rev. 22114 Page 2 of 13 _r1 arc aa?i:i..ns. n:.G ;r tc �a_r�H car;:k iait ns Packet Page -38- 3/25/2014 9.A. SECTION TWO: Amendments to the Table of Contents/Exhibits Page of the PUD Document Attached to Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and 05-52, the Quail H PUD. The Table of Contents/Exhibits Page of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and 05-52, the Quail II PUD, is hereby amended to add as follows: EXHIBITS Exhibit A—PUD Master Plan Exhibit B—R-1 District Master Plan Exhibit C— Sidewalk Exhibit for R-1 District Exhibit D—Turn Lane Detail for R-1 District SECTION THREE: Amendment to Statement of Compliance Section I of the PUD Document Attached to Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and 05-52, the Quail H PUD. Section I, No. 3, entitled "Statement of Compliance" of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance. Numbers 92-41 and 05-52, the Quail II PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: 3. The residential portion of the Quail II PUD. which comprises 18L59± acres, is consistent with the FLUE's Density Rating System (DRS). The base density for the Urban Residential Subdistrict is 4 dwelling units (D.U.) per acre which ••. - - ' - yields the site eligible for 726 units. Portions Greater than 50% of the PUD (135.55±/acre) are is located within the residential density band associated with Interchange Activity Center #4 (Immokalee Road at 1-75), and is therefore allowed to request an additional 3 units per acre, bringing the PUD potential dwelling unit count to 1271 . The total residential dwelling units initially requested (512) equates to 2.8 units per acre which is 40%44% of the potential dwelling units allowed by the FLUE Growth Management Plan and therefore, the project is consistent with the FLUE Growth Management Plan. Three hundred sixty (360) residential units have been constructed outside of the R-1 District. The developer has elected to construct up to 87 single-family attached or detached units or up to 152 multi-family units in the R-1 District. SECTION FOUR: Amendments to Project Descriptions Section II of the PUD Document Attached to Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and 05-52, the Quail II PUD. Section II, entitled "Project Description" of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and 05-52,the Quail II PUD, is hereby amended to read as follows: Quail 11 PUDIPUDZ-A-PL2009000 1 89 1 Rev.2/21/14 Page 3 of 13 Words underlined are additions;words ctru k-4 hr +gh are deletions Packet Page -39- 3/25/2014 9.A. 2.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS: a. 'iota) dweflin,,, unit count areas as residential and future residential on the .7.vinster 'Fm ant `Chun h. l nat cY.cced f12—unit.;360 built units plus proposed sitn..11e-!nmiiv units ,j ,c, f,itaehed and detached) or up to 152 multi-family units in the R-1 District. b. The area dcsianated as "fenvorary Sewage Treatment Site, Future Residential and'or Community Facilities" on the revised PI'D Master Plan 1,datcci October 210. 1)1, hinned to L.: mu...in:m:1 eili2. units. c. otni dv,e!iin2 unit count on lands L:buttina course shull no; ur.e.eed 300. SECTR)N FIVE: Amendments to Permitted Uses and Development Standards Section III of the l'UI) Document Attached to Ordinance Numbers 92-41 and 05-50, ptf). Section III. entitled. "Permitted U.,zes and Development .Stnildurds" of' the PUD Document attached to Ordinnnee Nwnher. Q2-4 I nr,.1 k hereby amended in read ns 1.4 RP.7;11)F.N..I.A1. 1:.-11)::-: 1H(.._ a. Establishment of R-I DisHc 1 P P tr.:;trit:j. is Lh.L. II to 1 :.-2; it.- I the Pt.-D \ias'er Plan 0,:xhilv-ri A and on the via.,,,er Plan LExhd,ii for the k '; , an-€1 _ II_ h. Leyal ! Ii3C.1 ..!.."-C+Fded 4 -1-37"-P'He PP : rkL and e.4i-c-e17,1-4 : .22 1- : . ' -2.7 43-41-ast Quail ll PUD • Rev.221 '14 4 of 13 Packet Page -40-- 3/25/2014 9.A. 'Tc-Ves-t dimensions, and tot: • he north boundary of Lot 15, and the north 14e.tiii4it 1 0 feet of Lot 11, both lots 11 and 15. being in-Quail Creek P-1-aya, Phase 2, ae-c--{‘)A4-ing---t-o-the-Plat thereof -)F-'-ded inr-12-1at--Book-1-g;--pae 71, of-1e---PubReee-rdTheFTGounty, Flor4da, Palazzo Villac.e. according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 46, Paces 75 and 76. Public Records of Collier County. Florida. Project Development Land Uses i. Residential sincic-family. detached. zero lot line. two-familv attached, duplex or multi-family uses--s-hown on the Quail II PUD ii. Residential unit type classification. Simile-family shall consist of detached, zero lot line and two-family and duplex units. Multi- shall consist of attached to\vnhouse (more than 2 units) and other units. iii. There shall be no mix of residential unit type within the R-1 District. The project will be all single family or all multi-family residential. 2. Project Density '1-he total acrcaLle of the R-1 District is approximately 21.74 acres. The maximum number of residential units to be built on the total acreacc is 152 multi-family or P,7 sincic-family residential units. -The--itusi-th.er--Tof units-per--Ter-t -a-L-F,e-is----7-4;7;--the-TR 1 [Xs-Jr-jet: C. 11.1) \;:lopmcin of Scheciul. cud Sequence The developer lintendsig construct the project in one phase. caller Count\ Sift'. De\Hopment Plan SDI's) ,Anp3-oval The IL",lew and approval of Sl)Ps shall follow the design and development standards of the Collier County I,DC in effect at the time or SDP or construction Flans and plat application. Dedication and Maintenance of Facilities Loafs and other infrastructure :-.1;:y be either public or Private. r,leen.iino on QuA II ND PUIV-A_1)1:100900(J 1 .;`..n Rc‘. 2 21 14 1:)1:2e. 5 of 13 Packet Page -41- 3/25/2014 9.A. location, capacity, and design. The developer shall create appropriate condominium associations or identify other entities that will he responsible for maintaining the roads, streets, drainage, water, and sewer improvements where such systems are not dedicated to the County. h. Model Units 1. Model units shall be permitted within this project subject to the following provisions: i. Models may not be utilized as "sales offices" without approval by and through the SDP process. The SDP process shall not be required for dry models. ii. Temporary access and utility easements shall be provided for temporary service to model units. iii. Sales, marketing, and administrative functions are permitted to occur in designated model units within the project only as provided herein. iv. Model homes located in the R-1 area shall be permitted subject to the requirements of Section 5.04.04 of the I:DC. Sales Centers 1. Sales centers may be constructed and will follow the review and approval requirements of the SDP process. Access to the sales center shall be provided by a paved road or temporary driveway which meets applicable County standards as determined by the County F neineer. A water management Pan shall be provided which accommodates the run-oil from the sales center, the required parking and access road/driveway and any other impervious surfaces. 2. At the time of building, permit application for the sales center. a temporary use permit shall be obtained. Sales centers may not be occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) is issued. 3. Sales Centers located in the R-1 area shall be permitted subject to the requirements of Section 5.04.0 of the LDC. — j, Develop:.nent 'Standards The standards for the construction of all project i . rastiucture, such as. but not limited to roads. utilities, wastewater treatment. water management facilities, and other site improvements such as but not limited to clearing, grading, excavation, landscaping and all similar types of she improvements, except for habitable buildings and structures. shall meet the minimum standards set forth by Collier County in the applicable ordinance or r`_.ul7tion in on-eel at the time of Si' ' t?r ion P i 'aon plans and plat application. — — --- Quail 11 PUD PtJDZ-A-PL 2009000 891 Rev.221!14 Paste6of13 Words underlined a,e,.d.: ions: w oa ;3•ietions Packet Page -42- 3/25/2014 9.A. The standards and development permit procedures for all habitable structures shall be in accordance with the County requirements in effect at the time of building permit application. k. Impact Fees Development within the project shall be subject to all lawfully adopted impact fees in effect at the time of SDP application. 1. Residential R-1 District Residential Uses 1. Purpose: The purpose of this paragraph is to set forth the regulations for the areas designated as "R-1"on the Quail II PUD Master Plan. 2. Maximum Residential Units A maximum number of 152 multi-family or 87 single-family detached, zero lot line, two-family and duplex or single-family attached/townhouse residential units may be constructed on lands designated as "R-1". 3. General Description Areas designated as "R-1" on the Master Land Use Plan are designed to accommodate multi family residential dwellings types. amenity areas, open space . Residential tracts are designed to accommodate and internal roadways. 4. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures i Sing>le-family detached, zero lot line. two-family and duplex. single- family attached/Ttownhouses, multi-family dwellings, and recreation facilities. ii Water management facilities. Lakes, including lakes with seawall and other types of architectural bank treatment. iii Open space recreational activities, and similar uses, including but not limited to shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, swimming pools, playground, picnic areas and other types of facilities intended for outdoor recreation. m5. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 4,a. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with uses permitted in multi family residential districts. Quail Il PUD/PUDZ-A-PL20090001891 Rev.2/21/14 Page 7 of 13 Words underlined are additions;words stwelt-thr-ough are deletions Packet Page-43- 3/25/2014 9.A. 211. Gatehouses De\-e1( pmn tandards Standar:Is p.irking. lapin . signs. Elalch:)uses, cntrcrc::: L:alcs and other uses not specified herein are to be in accordance with Collier Count\ I.I)C in effect rit the -time I SI)P orconstruction plans and plat Front vLinii setbacks shall be measured s: a. Ti the -r.:1c,21 is served b\' a Countv dedie.,cled puLlic rl,111.-efl-Y,.ay. the setback of buildinns or structures adiarent to the riLtht-of-‘vay is measured from the existim4 riLdit-ol-Nvay N. ff buildin,is or strucitc:es are served l-rom a pi:vat: drive or internal roadv,av, the setback: is measured dora tile back of curb or ed,c of pavement or hack of sidewalk. whichever is rinser to the structure. orrIrrnrirt:, fnis 2 .74 acre parcel of land wiii bc a cater! cotrimunity. 0. Recreation Commullitv - nor' en! are:•, shall I Oft ft. Di ii llvILIster I ire is built .-) Inc r. m' id:c D wrall 'Ind Mc a;ldc the strileture l-n\tirs (4-oricron f:-,r all recontional Lc..nlflcs ,A H hr florn .f.bsk and there will bc no .tnIplificd sound permitted. The minimum structure setHck be c, ne I C I i 1 ii hI Deeded roi. security ilurnoses hat no in-cater than 1 2 foot H 1.i,..L2htiria. shall be Yhielded aeb re. en. ' . erD :LtraLIe. Foch residential d\vellin2 unit adiar.:cnt to Vak\vood DrlYe shall have a -c m-ol-lbhed Oat: .1 ...:koht the Rev. 7 '1 N Pan: o113 Packet Page -44- 3/25/2014 9.A. development. sl l. Developer Commitments In addition to the PUD requirements, the project's developer is committed to place the following items in the project's Condominium Documents, Declaration of Codes Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, or other appropriate Home Owner's association documents: i. The development will contribute its proportional share (12%) for lake maintenance, repair. replacement and improvement for stormwater management relating to water quality to Longshore Lake Foundation. Specifically excluded from the proportionate share costs are lake bank maintenance, decorative features and experimental water quality practices. ii. Leasing of any condominium shall be subject to the following time periods: All leases shall be for a period of not less than ninety (90) consecutive days. No residential unit may be rented for more than three (3)times in any calendar year. iii. The project will he an equal partner (1/5) in the Valewood. Drive Landscape Maintenance Agreement. iv. The developer, or its successors or assigns, shall pay the sum of $1,000.00 per residential dwelling unit to the Collier County Affordable Housing Trust F. . " -- . -- -fie within seven (7) days of the initial closing on the respective residential units. This condition only applies to the residential units iv. Executive Drive shall be the construction entrance for all site work on the R-1 District tract and for vertical construction until 75% of the platted lots receive certificates of occupancy. v. Owner shall allow the existing encroaching, wall installed by Loneshore Lakes to remain on the R-1 District tract until the wall is rebuilt or replaced by Loneshore Lakes. At which time. it shall be rebuilt or replaced on property within the Loneshore Lakes PUD. Owner shall allow the Longshore Lakes Homeowner's Association access over the non-exclusive 10-foot utility easements granted to North Naples Utilities. Inc. and United Telephone Company of Florida as shown on plat of Palazzo Village recorded in Plat Book 46. Page 76 of the public records of Collier County. in order to maintain. rebuild or replace the entire length of the wall that is immediately adjacent to Owner's east property boundary or any fence that may replace the wall or any portion thereof. This right of access is conditioned upon the Loneshore Lakes Homeowner's Association's replacement and/or repair of any improvements, including landscaping. that may be damaged by the Longshore Lakes Quail 11 PUD/PL.DZ-A-t'L2009000 1 89 1 Rev.2121:14 Page 9 of 13 Words underlined are additions;words str-u. eugh are deletions Packet Page-45- 3/25/2014 9.A. Homeowner's Association's exercise of its riuht of access. yi. Owner shall install a deceleration lone and sidewalk on Valewood Fkive to serve rote R-1 District trtict in uccordance with Exhibi' D. If any portion of the sidewalk is constructed outside of' file Volewood Drive road riaht-of-way. then Owner shall convey a sidewalk easement for such portion of the sidewalk that is outside of the road rit2ht-of-wav to Collier County at no cost to Collier County. The conveeanCe :Mai I be prior to County's a.:!tteleientee of the sldewalle. 12. Deviations Applicable to the R-I Distrlet i. Deviation 1 seeks relief from teDC Section 4.0602. Buffer Requirements. which requires a 15 foot wide type 'B' buffer between residential and co m ercia I uses to :tern it a ]0 foot wide iVpC l3 buffer aloniz tile southern project boundary. ii. Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.02.A. - Sidewalk s. B iL. I.a ne nett Pniriw R. Men t „ which requires sidewalks to be e(..eistructed bottt sides of local streetc L n siic!..! of the stree 'nl a urn rite sereets, all 0 annlicable for the sinale family development option only. Deviation 5 seeks relief from I,lY Subsection 6,06.01 .0. Street :System Reuunements and onlerntix ii. Tyr:lieu' Street Sections and Rittlit-of-\\ DacOn Standards. \; :A ,estableThes a (0) foot wide local roiel ;o allow a 0. :11. Hee 7 : rt . razid. Qua'? 11 Piet)Pute;:t-A-Pi 2amloe1591 Rev. 721 '14 PL ? 10 of 13 Packet Page -46- 7777177-- 7.. ,25/2014 9.A. .1)-ev-e St S cleit 1.4{,,.I '-N4-}-1-11111LIM .1‘ft;a ; en-;Li 1 a rci S'et bac k 41. T- 44- he 4 f: ""-• . „ ti-it'-Si.ini-f+f4iic‘ " I I o113 •---'6,ge -47- 3/25/2014 9A. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE R-1 RESIDENTIAL AREAS ,.. STAND.ARI)S 1 SINGLE- SINGLY:- I --:-_------------ TWO I AMENITY - I-ANIIIY MULTI- FAMILY 1 : - ZERO FAMILY & FAMILY SITE 1 DETACHED ! DUPLEX (OPTIONAL) LLOT LINE L Minimum Lot Area I, 5.000 SF ' 4,000 SE 3.000 SF 1 ACRE 10.000 SF — Minimum I.ot Width 1 50 feet 40 feet 35 feet 150 feet N/A 1 Minimum Lot Depth , 100 feel 100 feet 100 feet 10 5 feet N/A 1 Minimum Sebatcks t Principal) ........ I Front Ynrd I '0 feet") 20 feet c h 20 Feet'l I 20 feetT7---- N/A ..1, 1 5 feet 0 feet 5 feet 1/2 sum of blcilz. N/A Side Yard . heitint Re.a_LYard__ I 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 20 feet N/A East 13oundar■ (Lott:I:hole . , Lake) 1 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet I 50 feet 30 feet ;_. SoithYl( untiatAiicomuerciu1) ,....Licet 15 feet 15 feet 20 N/A West 110undary(N..;..H1.,“),.1 , Dri\-e) 20 Hi 20 feet 20 feet 50 feet 20 feet InterualDrLes 1`,../A N/A N/A '0 1,-1 20 feet Maximum Buildin.(2, 11eie.ht ZonL:d 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 35 feet_O stories) 30 feet Actual : -1.0 Fee ..t , -10 feet .40 feet -10 feet ( ori ) 2 stes -10 feet . ________ Minimum Distance kei.\\evo I Strut One Stor , NA ' NiA NA 15 feet 10 feet "I\Ao St,oFy NiA NIA 15 fect1-3'1 20 feet N/linimum Fin.)r Area ,A't.'i 17Th S I' 15,00 SF 1500 SF 1500 SF N/A r----- . , . I ACCFSSOR'y' STIO.TC'IlikEs ---' , Minimum Front Yard sethz,A: : 20 feet I) (11 20fee,t 20feet11'1 20 fed 20 1 - t et`' —fe_ _- ,.. Minimum Side Yard Se0',:iwk 5 le,...1 0 feet 0 Feet .1, ICCI: I 0 feet - - - - --- Minimum Rear Yard Setback . 10 leet 10 feet 10 feet 1 10 feet 10 feet — — East Iionuclary 1.c,n,,:shore , 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 1 10 feet ; 10 feet Lake) ' Minnuum 1.1:1.t..11,:t.-. 11„!tY.'..e... ' Structures , .,' feet ID feet 10 feet 10 1,... t. 10 feet Maximum 1-4iildin:.111ei.-11-.. , I I Zoned :25 feet 25 feet 25 feet I 25 feet 25 feet , Actii:_t1 30 feet ' 30 feet 30 feet ' . s. 30 eat , 30 feet , '1' Measured o odee of',;1,1,:n\all, u, ...-dtu.! of bdvcruent or back of curb 111no side\Naik (SF front entry earaee s shall have 23' front .zr,Hacl; r::,111 : .,to,'..J-t' H'I :1:. ' :,:: 11■ ::... )\:!;L., ::1d j:' Iril:it 1-,,1:1'..:CWI-j t1 1 S '-h;1: haV,2 nO :,.."Th;.,I; 0-C•!11p11): 27,1% ° Or \ ::,:,..•.,,,J;:. huil,jH,, H*,,ht-, -,,H,,LK:\cr '417\til . be al 1,-.:,.1 1,, 11.u.' 1-1..b,..../:-. .1,-,:.--,::- - P,..o.! 2 21 1,-I Page 12 of 13 1L!',I,IiiitiOn:-.,; v,ardS ,.:1•;.: Packet Page -48- 3/25/2014 9.A. SECTION SIX: Amendments to Exhibit A of the PUD Document, the PUD Master Plan, and Addition of Exhibit B, the R-1 District Master Plan, Exhibit C, Sidewalk Exhibit and Exhibit 1), Turn Lane Detail. The "PUD Master Plan," labeled Exhibit A. is hereby amended and a new Exhibit B, R-1 District Master Plan, Exhibit C. Sidewalk Exhibit and Exhibit D. Turn Lane Detail are hereby adopted,both attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION SEVEN: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of .2014. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk TOM HENNING, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: -2/2- Heidi F. Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A—Original Master Plan Exhibit B—R-1 Master Plan Exhibit C— Sidewalk Detail for R-1 District Exhibit D—Turn Lane Detail for R-1 District 09-CPS-00991/119 Quail II PUD/PUDZ-A-PL20090001891 Rev. 2'21/14 Page 13 of 13 Words underlined are additions:words struck thfoliell are deletions Packet Page-49- mem. 3/25/2014 9.A. CUA.IL CREEK ESTATES .•L'A'•.'D COUNTRY CLUB ( PUD) I ; ....-- i ,,,/' • i . I i it / l g ..„ . • ' I ' & ' 1 I • ) L 1 ,•;-) i • — LI I t , I ; 1 • 1 1:4'447:11IL --; : "'4 ,; "1 1• 1 ; ..-,; I HUNTINGTON' He.1 f I 1 r ■ LONGSHORE LAKES 61 / LAKE ( PUD ) 2 1 . ,, ( PUD ) ..-41 ri',11 i i I 1 1-, 1 L i I, i ri , a t i 1 - i '' . on 11 5. 1 ! f! 1 ...... !! P r.' 1 ■ — . ._, . 1 — ! .. 's *1 5' BLIFFER MAY BE REDUCED TO 10'IF _ ' ; "---'•,,, 7,' ,=-/ 7 I DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 7 .7,:.. ■ i ' 'L '"I i . :,.,...t. , . I 1 ;Anus&AI:S:7:..rilieS, I —..",--s'4' = I ------h. LI, E!..,... Arthur-.1i11.;&Assoz.ates,:nc. Gu:l Course Arc:lilac:is .5,-.r., COMMERCIAL 1__I' Wilson M,Ier Inc. L c! ._ 1 :";-•; ( OMMERCIAL EXHIBIT INV CANAL MGM'07 WAY rk ,.._•,. C,':.. ti,,f-,.1:1_ i,1 - PUD MASTER PLAN FOR nurq11...1771-tr,r1ILY ANn SINGLE FAMILY :Zaction ae 25 E Packet Page -50-- * — — ,. .. .; . -- - - 3/25/2014 9 A MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTE NS:TY / / i I • FOR R-1 DISTF:C1 HP TO -■:-..? M.:,T1 FAMi.Y DE Ef' C;NELE FAAIH Y DI,VEIL:HG; -,.■%,",-1: w...:ou..:0,Es ATTACHED DETACHED, ZEPC LOT LINE, T'AIO-FANNLY AlETACHED AND DI:FLEX: AS DESCRiDED !N OL:AIL ;! ELD ,:-.) DINANC,E, / -- ' ' , ■ SECTION 34. / /, "15' BUFFER MAv BE RE.-7DUC.Er.; TO OPr.D'A,7.11H 1:7";.'.:21._E Ff.!;;'i,...Y 1-1CLAES. /, ,. , /.. DEVIATIONS 7/ ..' / ' / r= ' u..1-'‘i ■ 'T I.;SEEKS RE.'L F R,:'...)kt ED',SEC:7;DH 4 DC!!!: --SUFFER REOI.;E".E!!!-ENTS' 11:1:0:,RED,,,R.F.3 A, ,..,, ,...!2,; . AREA 15-FOOT WIDE TFPE'Er BORE EP BETWEEN PES;DENT■AL ANL,COM:.'"EF,C. k_ DSES'!■G FER,;,CT A, ,- ,.." ; ARE,LA 10-FOOT WIDE TYPE'S BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTHERN PROJECT E3OUNDARY fi SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDS SL:ESECTIONI C 60 02 A. "SIDE\A'1.1 KS 5/5.AN AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS" WHCH REQUiRES Si-DE:WALKS TS SE -- .%....-` CONSTRUCTED ON ROTH SIDES OF LS:DAL STREETS TO'10.:,C-RA,'S:DETANIALKS, , 5-FOOT IN WIDTH, ON ONE SIDE OF 1HE STREET ONLY FOR PRiVATE STREETS THIS 11:10,/;ATiON!3'ALL RE APPAS:7. FOP THE S■NOLE . , FAMILY DEVE,_ PM E NT OPT:C N ONLY .- ..-<;t5--,;,,,,- ..? -..?„, • 3 SEEKS R .RUE FROM JO 2■CDSECTiDN '6 06 01 N, "STF,EET SYSTEM, RI:ECU:REM-EN''..-, „ . . AND"APPEND!) 1'3' TYP!CAL .ETRE.ET SECTiONS AND RIGHT-C):..WF Y DES;GN S,TAND,^ADS WHICH ESTABI.SHES A 50-FOOT ',.;1.',0E I.DLA1 , .-- ,.---„,,,,, . ROAD TO Ail L!;!--: A MINIM :V f!C-FDDT I,AECE..-"- '' ,. ..." ; w PRIVATE ROAD ;PREVIOUSLY AHPRSAIED: / / ;" . - f ;!; j ........4 ca CI ....,... QUAIL CREEK / .,' .' :5' TYPE- B BUFFEE's. . . , ....." ESTATES AND ,/ // VV' 6' - 8' HIGH WALL* . • w COUNTR'1`. CLUB . ', ''' -' '1 , w 15.'TY!PE 'E'' BLIFFE-F--;.* . Y (PLF3) ›.. n . ......, .._. - ...., „ . 21 74 AC +..._ ; < 0 (f) R-1 DESTRICT ,., Z 1; , i 23 , — ' 0 ii : --1 .....i z , - — . . 0 if i - - . II , Ii ' t , I I • ; : i V il, .3' - 8' i--i!GH ',NALL 11 i c5. , , COL,9v.F"SCIAl. PFI,OPERWS . : C3 i I 1 , I 10 I io , ,_ _ _ , , , , ‘ ‘ ," .,., ,,. , , , \,.... .A. 1 i . . - .-., < _ _. ,...... , . I >. 1 1 ' ! [ ' ■ - , _1 i ■ 11 ! i I 1 COCOH A TCHEP- CANAL 1 • 1 200' ; ,:iy',?r,,,C,k,","-,LEE--.. ROAD -. . : — ----- ----- ....,.- .,, _ CradvIii,— . . ,._ , CI%il 1112111,t's . 1,..II::, ■■.., . 1 si.•,,,, . ; .,.1t, .,, t r 1,•,:, v.:.111; Ce 1 Packet Pag2 -51- - , 3/25/2014 9.A. i i , , , 1 Li i . 0 1 OC 200' SCALE: 1"= 200' N ' ,• --V- -- 1 ,- ,- .,...., /-"-- 4,, „---:----'---- „..------ ,\ \ ,,,„,",,,<--,-;-•--- 1 #00,),,- ,, 7 7„,--"" ..-...... I 1 III I I / '/-7:''' . . . • , / ,/ , I I I 1 / / / _ ! I I. t , 1 1 i 1 / /17 L, ' Ii ( 1 ,k( \ '., . -... 1 ' - _- I --,■—___.--/ 1 „ ,- —II I . , '-7- ,....___ t , 1 , i ! :-:-: 1 i i 1 - L.......______ • „„. ..,- :7 11.1111, /I .DL/D 112 1;rmi\Vtior 1";;Ki al' C.: civil 1,11glik,, • ,, ..,:,,i,,,tt t:• • 1`,.WWI, • LIIIIisf:11tt•\I■lid,iS R—1 DISTRICT . .,, ■,.....,,., 3 — I DEWAL K EX t-i!RIT 144•.1.;s..,,, , . ,, ,,, . . , Or *. 3 --- , Packet Page -52- P.IINNWC,1111MINCIK:03.11113r., 3/25/2014 9.A. o ; „ \ ,.- .. / ' y _---� F f a I -/ w\ / / Lii / ry Cr) • ''t, a Q cn ! ;w b m 2 2 1"1\ -, x a • v> vas,- \ � x E . \ , n \\ w , c e l \ 4 5 ,Z. , \,,,, \ •t E-r.. ` "53— ��,� � 3/25/2014 9.A. [[ gel] i w 11 � v av ORDINANCE NO.05- 52 � V P19114 LZ���o 6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) KNOWN AS THE QUAIL II PUD, TO CHANGE A TRACT DESIGNATION FROM COMMERCIAL TO MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, FOR A MAXIMUM OF 152 ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNITS, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 21.74 ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE PARTIAL REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 92-41, THE EXISTING QUAIL II PUD ORDINANCE; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Valewood Properties, LLC, represented by Bruce E. Tyson, AICP, of WilsonMiller, Inc., has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from" UD",_Ito "PUD," in accordance with the additions and deletions to Ordinance Number 92-41,the,Quail PUP as reflected in the PUD Document,attached hereto as Exhibit"A,"which is incorPratedtereinr and by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps; as &serif in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Develo*i t Gode, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance Number 92-41, known as the Quail II PUD,adopted on June 36, 1992, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,is hereby repealed only to the extent that the Ordinance is inconsistent with the additions and deletions set forth in the Quail II PUD Words del Packet Page-54-`underlined are added. 3/25/2014 9.A. Document attached hereto as Exhibit "A". All other provisions of Ordinance Number 92-41 shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this I` day of DGkobe r ,2005. ATTEST:. - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E.BROCK CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA ' q&C. WK )AOC BY: /1-A41 W. DEPUTY CLERK FRED W.COYLE,CHAT Attest as to Chairman's Signature only Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Marjod)ie M. Student-Stirling Assistant County Attorney PU DA-2005-AR-7152/H W/sp This ordinance filed with the tory of t t 's Offic he ay of and acknowledgement of that fill • e eived this' A-day of(Co. Bye .'.$IW.' tll Deputy CINrk Words stet Packet Page-55-inderlined are added. gage 2 of 2 3/25/2014 9.A. QUAIL II A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PREPARED BY: VINES & ASSOCIATES, INC. 715 TENTH STREET SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 33940 PHONE: (813) 262-4164 and WILSONMILLER, INC. WILSON PROFESSIONAL CENTER 3200 BAILEY LANE. SUITE 200 NAPLES, FL 34105 DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC 2/20/92 DATE APPROVED BY BCC 6/16/92 ORDINANCE NUMBER 92-41 AMENDMENTS REVIEWED BY CCPC 9/01/05 AMENDMENT APPROVED BY BCC i n- _n ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005-52 EXHIBIT "A" -05.-AR-7152,PUD Document,9-30-05 Packet Page -56- 3/25/2014 9.A. • TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION I STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 SECTION II PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 SECTION HI PREMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 4 SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 18 PUD MASTER PLAN ATTACHMENT 1 PUDA-2005-AR-7152, PUD Documer..9-30-05 Packet Page -57- 3/25/2014 9.A. SECTION I c • 1, • d , ,• A - � - ----- --- ---- Li - - n - - • • Statement of Compliance: 1. The development of this Project will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County, as set forth in the Future Land Use Element. 2. The Quail II PUD is located within the urban residential subdistrict. The Quail II PUD includes commercial property zoned prior to the adoption of the Collier County Growth Manaaement Plan (January 10, 1989), which has been found to be consistent through the Zoning Re-evaluation Program, and, which property is designated on the Future Land Use Map Series as Properties Consistent By Policy. Therefore, the location of commercial uses within this PUD is in compliance with the Growth Management Plan. 3. The residential portion of the Quail II PUD is consistent with the FLUE's Density Rating System (DRS). The base density for the Urban Residential Subdistrict is 4 dwelling units (du) per acre which for this 194.34+/- acre project equals 777 units. Portions of the PUD (135.55+1- acres) are located within the residential density band associated with Interchange Activity Center #4 (Immokalee Road at 1-75), and is therefore allowed to request an additional 3 units per acre. bringing the PUD potential dwelling unit count to 1183. The total residential dwelling units requested (512) equates to 2.6 unitsper acre which is 43% of the potential dwelling units allowed by the Growth Management Plan and therefore, the project is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. This project shall be subject to applicable sections of the LDC at the time of development order approval. except as otherwise provided herein. The Quail II PUD is a master planned community and is planned to encourage ingenuity, nnovation and imagination as set forth in the Land Development Code (LDC) Planned Unit Development District. All final local development orders for this project are subject to the Collier County -•o�eauate Public Facilities Ordinance, Sections 6.02.00 and 10.02.07 of the LDC. :5-AR-7152. PUD Document,9-30-05 Packet Page-58- 3/25/2014 9.A. SECTION II PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 DISTRICT ZONE: PUD: This project may be comprised of a mixture of commercial uses, residential uses, and community facilities. 2.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS: a. Total dwelling unit count in the areas designated as residential and future residential on the Master Development Plan shall not exceed 3644 512 units. b. The area designated as "Temporary Sewage Treatment Site, Future Residential and/or Community Facilities" on the revised PUD Master Plan (dated October 30, 1991) shall be limited to a maximum of 60 dwelling units. c. Total dwelling unit count on lands abutting the golf course shall not exceed 300. 2.3 DWELLING UNIT DISTRIBUTION: Prior to issuance of building permits for dwelling units, a detailed plan showing building locations, building heights, number of dwelling units per building, access drives and offstreet parking shall be prepared, submitted to, and approved by the Director. 2.4 SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN: The approved Quail II Master Plan shall constitute the approved Subdivision Master Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat, as appropriate, for the golf course and residential complex. A Subdivision Master Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat, as appropriate, for the commercially designated property shall be submitted to the County for administrative review by staff. The plan shall meet the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the PUD Document. 2.5 EXCEPTIONS TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS: a. Article X, Section 19: Street name signs shall be approved by the County Engineer, but need not meet the U.S.D.O.T.F.N.W.A. Manual of Uniform Traffic. -2- PUDA-2005-AR-7152, PUD Document.9-30-05 Packet Page -59- 3/25/2014 9.A. Control Devices. Street pavement painting, striping, and reflective edging requirements shall be waived. b. Article X, Section 24; The requirement to place permanent reference monuments and permanent control points in a typical water valve cover where such monuments occur within the street pavement areas shall be waived. c. Article XI, Section 17F. & G.: All streets other than the existing principal entrance drive shall be classified as local. Local streets shall be comprised of a 20 ft. wide travelway within a 50 ft. wide privately owned street right of way commons. d. Article XI, Section 17.H: The 1,000 ft. maximum dead-end street length requirement shall be waived. An emergency vehicle access way shall be provided which connects the southernmost residential access drive to Valewood Drive. e. Article XI, Section 17.1: The requirement for curbs at all residential street intersections shall be waived and concrete valley gutters shall be permitted as a substitute, except at intersections of the residential streets with Valewood Drive or SR 846. Edge of pavement radii at street intersections shall be 30 ft. f. Article XI, Section 17.K: The requirement for 100 ft. tangent sections between reverse curves of streets shall be waived. g. Article XI, Section 21: The requirement for blank utility casings shall be waived. -3- ?UD Document.9-30-05 Packet Page -60- 3/25/2014 9.A. SECTION III PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 3.1 RESIDENTIAL AREAS a. Permitted Uses and Structures 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: Attached and detached single family structures; multi-family dwellings; recreational open space; golf course and golf club complex, including indoor and outdoor social, recreational, dining, and service facilities; golf course maintenance facilities. 2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures which are customary in golf course and multi-family residential communities; administrative, sales and rental offices, which offices may be located in temporary or permanent structures; access control gates at points of residential street connection with Valewood Drive. b. Development Standards: 1. Residential Areas: a) Minimum building setback from street; 50 ft. from back of curb for 3- or 4- story multi-family structures; 40 ft. from back of curb for 2-story single family or multi-family structures; 30 ft. from back of curb of 1-story single family or multi-family structures; 20 ft. from back of curb for garages and other accessory structures, whether freestanding or attached to a residence. b) Minimum setbacks of structures from golf course: None c) Minimum separation between adjoining 1-and/or 2-story structures: 8 ft. d) Minimum separation between a principal structure and its accessory structures: 5 ft. unless structurally joined. e) Minimum separation between accessory structures: 5 ft. unless structurally joined. f) Minimum side yards for all other circumstances other than between adjoining 1-and/or 2-story structures: One-half the building height, but not less than 15 ft. g) Maximum building height: Four living floors -4- PUDA-2005-AR-7152. ?UD Doc..--ient,9-30-05 Packet Page-61- 3/25/2014 9.A. • h) Minimum dwelling unit floor area: 1,000 sq. ft. i) Minimum offstreet parking spaces: 2 spaces per dwelling unit. j) In the case of cluster buildings with a common architectural theme, the above distances may be reduced provided the site plan is approved by the Community Development Director. 2. Golf Course and Golf Club Areas: a) Maximum golf club building height: 2 stories. b) Minimum separation between clubhouse and street; 75 ft. from back of curb. c) Minimum separation between tennis courts or other recreational equipment from back of curb: 25 ft. d) Minimum separation between a community swimming pool or community recreation structure and street: 25 ft. from back of curb. e) Minimum separation between clubhouse, other recreation building, pool, tennis court, or other recreation equipment and a residential structure: 25 ft. -5- :05-AR-7152, °UD Document.9-30-05 Packet Page -62- 3/25/2014 9.A. • 3.2 TEMPORARY SEWAGE TREATMENT SITE: FUTURE RESIDENTIAL AND/OR COMMUNITY FACILITIES AREA. a. Permitted Uses and Structures: 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: Temporary sewage treatment plant; attached and detached single-family structures; and multi-family dwellings. 2. Permitted Conditional Uses and Structures: The following uses listed under Section 2.2.19, Community Facility District, of the Collier County Land Development Code: child care centers, churches and houses of worship, civic and cultural facilities, museums, nursing homes and adult congregate living facilities (ACLFs) in accordance with Section 2.6.26, Location Requirements for Group Housing, of the Collier County Land Development Code and Policy 5.8 of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, parks and playgrounds, non-commercial recreation facilities; open space uses, tennis facilities, community centers, private clubs, and social and fraternal organizations; and residential facilities for elderly persons in accordance with Policy 5.8 of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 3. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures which are customary in multi-family residential communities; and in association with community facilities; administrative, sales and rental offices, which offices may be located in temporary or permanent structures; access control gates at points of residential street connection with Valewood Drive. b. Development Standards: For residential development, as required by the development standards listed under Paragraph 3.1b, Section III, Permitted Uses and Development Standards, of the Quail II PUD Document; for permitted community facilities development, as required by the development standards listed under Section 2.2.19, Community Facility District, of the Collier County Land Development Code; for residential facilities for elderly persons, in accordance with Policy 5.8 of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, as established during the Site Development Plan approval process, however, no building shall be higher than 30 ft. in height. -6- PUDA-2005-AR-7152.PUD Docume-t.9-30-05 Packet Page-63- 3/25/2014 9.A. 3.3 COMMERCIAL AREAS a. Permitted Uses and Structures: 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: Commercial uses as listed in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate District, provided that automobile service stations may incorporate convenience food and beverage sales and mechanical car wash facilities. Automobile service stations shall otherwise comply with the standards set forth in Section 2.6.28. of the Collier County Land Development Code. Residential facilities for elderly persons in accordance with Policy 5.8 of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan are permitted. Nursing homes and adult congregate living facilities (ACLFs) in accordance with Section 2.6.26, Location Requirements for Group Housing, of the Collier County Land Development Code and Policy 5.8 of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan are also permitted. 2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures which are customary in commercial areas; administrative, sales and rental offices, which offices may be located in temporary or permanent structures; access control gates at points of residential street connection with Valewood Drive. b. Development Standards: Yard requirements, building height, minimum building floor area, landscape requirements, signs, lights, and related development features shall be subject to development plan approval as set forth in Division 3.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code. The C-3, Commercial Intermediate District, regulations shall be the controlling standards used to determine whether or not development plan approval shall be granted. -7- -.`305-AR-7152. DUD Document,9-30-05 Packet Page-64- 3/25/2014 9.A. 3.4 RESIDENTIAL R-1 DISTRICT a. Establishment of R-1 District 1. This district is formed within the Quail II PUD to establish development regulations for development Tract R-1 as shown on the PUD Master Plan. The intent is to provide development regulations for the project area that are consistent with Collier County's development regulations, The original PUD zoning for this tract was commercial and the conversion of this tract to residential use will increase the maximum number of residential units within Quail II PUD from 360 residential units to 512 residential units. b. Legal Description 1. Lots 10 and 11, Quail Creek Plaza Phase 2 accordin* to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 18, page 71. Public Records of Collier County, Florida, And Tract B. Quail Creek Plaza. Phase 1 accordina to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 15. paoe 73, Public Records of Collier County. Florida, less and except that portion thereof, comprisi_g of Quail Creek Plaza Phase 2. according to the Plat thereof. recorded in Plat Book 18. page 71, of the Public Records of Collier Count Florida and less & except a rectan.ular parcel of land 93.04 feet in North-South dimensions and 225.23 feet in East- West dimensions. and totally abutting on its South side the north boundary of Lot 15, and the north boundary of the west 40 feet of Lot 14, both lots 14 and 15. being in Quail Creek Plaza, Phase 2, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 18, paae 71, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. c. Project Development 1. Land Uses i. Residential multi-family uses shown on the Quail II PUD Master Plan. d. Project Density The total acreage of the R-1 District is approximately 21.74 acres. The maximum number of residential units to be built on the total acreage is 152. The number of dwellina units per gross acre is 7 in the R-1 District. -8- PUDA-2005-AR-7152.PUD Dccument.9-30-05 Packet Page -65- 3/25/2014 9.A. • e. Development of Schedule and Sequence The developer will construct the proiect in one phase. f. Collier County Site Development Plan (SDPs) The review and approval of SDPs shall follow the desian and development standards of the Collier County LDC in effect at the time of SDP application. a. Dedication and Maintenance of Facilities Roads and other infrastructure may be either public or private, depending on location, capacity, and design. The developer shall create appropriate condominium associations or identify other entities that will be responsible for maintaining the roads. streets, drainage, water, and sewer improvements where such systems are not dedicated to the County. h. Model Units 1. Model units shall be permitted within this project subject to the following provisions: i_ Models may not be utilized as `salmis offices" v'.'ithout approval by and through the SDP process. The SDP process shall not be reouired for dry models. ii. Temporary access and utility easements shall be provided for temporary service to model units. iii. Sales. marketing, and administrative functions are permitted to occur in designated model units within the project only as provided herein. R_ Sales Centers 1. Sales centers may be constructed and will follow the review and approval requirements of the SDP process. Access to the sales center shall be provided by a paved road or temporary driveway which meets applicable County standards as determined by the County Engineer. A water manaaement plan shall be provided which accommodates the run-off from the sales center, the recuired parkinE: and access road/driveway and any other impervious surfaces. 2. At the time of building per-tit application for the sales center. a temporary use permit shall be obtained. Sales centers may not be occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) is issued. -9- -2005-AR-7152. PUD Document,9-30-05 Packet Page -66- 3/25/2014 9.A. Development Standards The standards for the construction of all project infrastructure, such as, but not limited to roads, utilities, wastewater treatment, water management facilities, and other site improvements such as but not limited to clearing, grading, excavation, landscaping and all similar types of site improvements, except for habitable buildings and structures, shall meet the minimum standards set forth by Collier County in the applicable ordinance or regulation in effect at the time of SDP application. The standards and development permit procedures for all habitable structures shall be in accordance the County requirements in effect at the time of building permit application. k. Impact Fees Development within the project shall be subject to all lawfully adopted impact fees in effect at the time of SDP application. Residential R-1 District 1. Purpose: The purpose of this paragraph is to set forth the regulations for the areas designated as "R-1"on the Quail II PUD Master Plan. 2. Maximum Residential Units A maximum number of 152 residential units may be constructed on lands designated as "R-1". 3. General Description Areas designated as "R-1"on the Master Land Use Plan are designed to accommodate multi-family residential dwelling types. Residential tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways. 4. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures i. Townhouses, multi-family dwellings, and recreation facilities. ii. Water management facilities. Lakes, including lakes with seawall and other types of architectural bank treatment. -10 PUDA-2005-AR-7152.PUD Document.9-30-05 Packet Page-67- 3/25/2014 9.A. • iii. Open space recreational activities, and similar uses, including but not limited to shuffleboard courts, tennis courts, swimming pools. playground, picnic areas and other types of facilities intended for outdoor recreation. m. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with uses permitted in multi-family residential districts. 2. Gatehouses n. Development Standards Standards for parking, landscaping, signs, gatehouses, entrance gates and other uses not specified herein are to be in accordance with Collier County LDC in effect at the time of SDP application. Front yard setbacks shall be measured as follows: 1. If the parcel is served by a County dedicated public right-of-way, the setback of buildings or structures adjacent to the right-of-way is measured from the existing right-of-way line. 2. If the buildings or structures are served from a private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement, whichever is closer to the structure. o. Gated Community This 21.74 acre parcel of land will be a gated community. n Recreation Facilities Recreation facilities within the development shall be centrally located toward the middle of the property. Garages Each residential dwelling unit shall have a one (1) or two (2)-car garage. Each residential dwelling unit adjacent to Valewood Drive shall have a two (2)-car garage. r. Roofing Materials Asphalt shingles are prohibited as a roofino material throughout the development. -11- - {-2005-AR-7152, PUD Document.9-30-05 Packet Page -68- 3/25/2014 9.A. s. Developer Commitments In addition to the PUD requirements, the project's developer is committed to place the following items in the project's Condominium Documents, Declaration of Codes Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, or other appropriate Home Owner's association documents: i. The development will contribute its proportional share(12%) for lake maintenance for stormwater management to Longshore Lake Foundation. ii. Leasing of any condominium shall be subject to the following time periods: All leases shall be for a period of not less than ninety (90) consecutive days. No residential unit may be rented for more than three (3) times in any calendar year. iii. The project will be an equal partner (1/5) in the Valewood Drive Landscape Maintenance Agreement. iv. The developer, or its successors or assigns, shall pay the sum of $1,000.00 per residential dwelling unit to the Collier County Affordable Housing Trust Fund. These payments shall be made within seven (7) days of the initial closing on the respective residential units. This condition only applies to the residential units located within the R-1 District of this PUD. -12- PUDA-2005-AR-7152, PUD Document.9-30-05 Packet Page -69- 3/25/2014 9.A. Development Standards R-1 Residential Multi-Family Areas Cateaor_y Dimensional Requirement Minimum Site Area 1 Acre Site Width – Minimum Average 150 Feet Site Death – Minimum Averaae 150 Feet LSetbacks — Valewood Drive 50 Feet East Boundary 50 Feet Internal Drives 20 Feet Commercial Tract 20 Feet I Side Yard Setback 1/2 The Height of the Principal Structure Rear Yard Setback– Principal Structure 20 Feet Rear Yard Setback–Accessory Structure 10 Feet Maximum Building_Height Two (2) stories. not exceeding 35 feet I Distance Between Principal Structures 15' *1 – 1 story 25' *1 –2-3 stories 5.1inimum Building Area 1670 square feet (air-conditioned) *1 or ',4 the sum of the adjacent buildings. whichever is greater. 3.5 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS The purpose of this paraaraph is to set forth the development commitments of the project. a. PUD MASTER PLAN The PUD Master Plan is an illustrative plan. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities. b. ENVIRONMENTAL Petitioner shall obtain all necessary local, state and federal permits. Development shall proceed in accordance with the contents of this Document, applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan and the regulations in the Collier County LDC in effect at the time of issuance of any development orders to which said reaulations relate. such as, but not limited to final site development plan, excavation Permit and preliminary work authorization. Where these regulations fail to provide development standards, the provisions of the most similar district in the Land Development Code shall apply. Environmental permitting is not anticipated. However. if required, environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resource Permit Rules. as well as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permitting program. -13- - --:0o5-AR-7152, PUD Document,9-30-05 Packet Page-70- 3/25/2014 9.A. An exotic vegetation eradication, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic free) plan for the site shall be submitted to Community Development and Environmental Services (CDES) Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final SDP approval. c. WATER MANAGEMENT Detailed paving, grading, and site drainage plans shall be submitted as part of the SDP application. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is .ranted b CDES En•ineerina Services Department. The Property is the subject of South Florida Water Management District Permit Number 11-00420-S. This permit allows for the stormwater flows from this property to exit to the east through an existing piping system to the Longshore Lake Project. According to the permit, no stormwater retention is needed on this property. Final permitting will require a modification to this Permit to describe the new development and its proposed stormwater management system. All agreements regarding control elevations or discharge rates shall be made with SFWMD/Big Cypress Basin. d. TRANSPORTATION 1. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement markings and design criteria shall be in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FDOT Design Standards, current edition. and the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), current edition. All other improvements shall be consistent with and as reauired by the Collier County LDC. 2. Arterial level street lightina shall be provided at all access points. Access lighting shall be in Place prior to the issuance of the first CO. 3. Access points, including both driveways and proposed streets, shown on the PUD Master Plan are considered to be conceptual. Nothing depicted on any such Master Plan shall vest any right of access at any specific point along any property frontage. All such access issues shall be approved or denied during the review of reauired subseauent SDP or final plat submissions. All such access shall be consistent with the Collier County Access Management Policy (Res. 01-247), as it may be amended from time to time. and with the Collier County Long-Range Transportation Plan. The number of access points constructed may be less than the number depicted on the Master Plan: however, no additional access points shall be considered unless a PUD amendment is processed. -14- PUDA-2005-AR-7152, PUD Document. -30-05 Packet Page -71- 3/25/2014 9.A. • 4. Site- related improvements (as opposed to system-related improvements) necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project. as determined by Collier County Transportation Division, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the pubic prior to the issuance of the first CO. 5. Road impact fees shall be paid in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 01-13, as amended, and Chapter 74 of the Code of Laws & Ordinances as amended. 6. All work within Collier County rights-of-way or public easements shall require a right-of-way permit. T All proposed median opening locations shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Management Policy (Resolution 01-247). as it may be amended and the LDC as it ma be amended. Collier Coun reserves the right to modify or close any median opening existing at the time of approval of this PUD which is found to be adverse to the health. safety and welfare of of the public. Any such modifications shall be based on, but are not limited to. safety, operational circulation, and roadway capacity. 8. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of a right in/right out condition at any access point. Neither shall the existence of a point of ingress, a point of egress, a median opening, nor the lack thereof,, be the basis for any future cause of action for damaoes against the County by the developer, its successor in title. or assignee. 9. All internal roads, driveway, alleys, pathways, sidewalks and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer. Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. 10. All construction traffic would be restricted to Commercial Drive or where Collier County requires construction entrance to be located. 11. If required by the Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) that will have to be submitted as part of the site development plan review process. Developer will build a right turn lane on Valewood Drive at the project entrance. If a turnino lane is required. the Valewood Drive buiidino setback of lift (50 feet as noted in the development standards table shall be measured from the current ROW line and not from a future modified ROW line that may include a turnino lane. e. UTILITIES The water distribution system and appurtenant facilities to serve the project are to be designed. constructed, conveyed. owned and maintained pursuant to the reouirements of Collier County. -15- _. -2005-AR-7152. PUD Document,9-30-05 Packet Page -72- 3/25/2014 9.A. The sewage collection, transmission and disposal facilities to serve the project are to be designed. constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained pursuant to the requirements of Collier County. f. SIGNAGE All County sign regulations shall apply unless such regulations are in conflict with the conditions set forth in this section. For the purpose of this PUD, each platted parcel shall be considered a separate parcel of land and shall be entitled to any sign as permitted herein. All signs shall be located so as not to cause sight distance problems. A maximum of four(4) project signs shall be permitted. Two (2) signs shall be located along Valewood Drive and two (2) at the intersection of Executive and Commercial Drives per LDC 5.06.04. g: ENGINEERING Detailed paving, grading, and site drainage plans shall be submitted as part of the SDP application. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by CDES. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with appropriate provisions of the Collier County Ordinances regulating land development. h. LANDSCAPING Landscape architectural plans shall be submitted as part of the SDP filing. Up to one-half(1/2) or seven and one-half feet (7.5') of the fifteen foot (15') Collier County Drainage Easement that runs parallel to and twenty feet (20') west of the east property boundary may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements of Section 4 of the LDC. A six (6') foot to eight (8') foot high wall or fence with a minimum (6) foot off-set from the property line and meeting the requirements of LDC Section 5.03.02.E of the LDC shall be installed along the residential-commercial boundary. Trees shall be planted 30 feet on-center on the commercial side of the wall or fence with a hedge on both sides of the wall planted at 30-inch heights and three (3') feet on- center. A six (6') foot high stucco wall with a hedge four(4')-foot tall on the roadside of the fence shall be installed along Valewood Drive. -16- PUDA-2005-AR-7152,PUD Document.9-30-05 Packet Page-73- 3/25/2014 9.A. • The Longshore Lake wall on the East Side of Valewood Village has a gap at Valewood Villages' far northeast corner. This gap shall be filled with a new wall, matching the existing Longshore Lake walls' height, building materials and color constructed by the Valewood Village developer. The landscape buffer along the east, north and west property lines shall contain trees with a minimum height of 12 feet or the tree height shall be one-half of the adjacent building height, which ever is greater. -1 7- = 2-2005-A.R-7152, PUD Document.9-30-05 Packet Page -74- 3/25/2014 9.A. SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 4.1 TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS a. The developer shall provide separate left and right turn storage lanes on Immokalee Road at the eastern entrance to the commercial area. b. The developer or his successor in title shall make a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of traffic signals at either or both access points to SR 846, when deemed warranted by the County Engineer. The signals will be owned, operated, and maintained by Collier County. c. Lakes shall have a minimum separation of 100 ft. between top of bank and the nearest street right of way, or shall be separated from the nearest street by an approved physical barrier. i. Space shall be reserved to permit a future minor street connection between Valewood Drive and lands to the east, provided, however, that such street connection may not be the principal access point to lands to the east unless such principal access is authorized by the Quail Creek/Quail II development organization. 4.2 UTILITIES a. All on-site and off-site utility facilities constructed by the developer in connection with the development shall be constructed to County standards at no cost to the County and shall be deeded to the County Water-Sewer District in accordance with applicable County ordinances and regulations. b. All customer connections to the sanitary sewer and water distribution facilities will be customers of the County Water-Sewer District and will be billed in accordance with a County approved rate structure. -18- PUDA-2005-AR-7152,PUD Document,9-30-05 Packet Page -75- 3/25/2014 9.A. c. All construction plans and technical specifications for the proposed utility facilities must be reviewed and approved by the Utility Division prior to commencement of construction. d. As proposed, the rights-of-way within the project will be privately owned and maintained. Appropriate utility easements dedicated to the county Water-Sewer District must be provided for the proposed water and sewer facilities to be constructed. e. All construction on the proposed sanitary sewer system shall utilize proper methods and materials to insure watertight conditions. f. Data required under County Ordinance No. 80-112 must be submitted and approval granted prior to approval of the construction documents for the project. Submit a copy of the approved DER permit application for the sewage collection and transmission system and a copy of the approved DER permit application and operating permit for the wastewater treatment facility to be utilized, along with the data required for Ordinance No. 80-112. g. All construction plans and technical specifications for the plant relocation, transfer pump station, force main and pump design data must be reviewed and approved by the Utility Division prior to commencement of construction. h. Additional Conditions: 1. If required by applicable County Ordinance, connection to the County's Central Water and Sewer facilities will be made by the owners, their assigns or successors, at no cost to the County or the County Water-Sewer District, within 90 days after such facilities become available. 2. The owners, their assigns or successors shall pay all system development charges at the time that building permits or connections to the County's Central Water and Sewer facilities are requested, whichever is applicable, pursuant to the appropriate County Ordinances and Regulations in effect at the time of permit or connection request. Note: The above utilities related requirements are extracted from Utilities Manager, I. R. Berzon's memo of May 10, 1982 to Mary Lee Kirchoff, Planning Department. The requirements are intended to represent current County Utilities policy. in the event that County policy or ordinances regarding utilities are modified, the modified policy and/or ordinance requirements shall be applicable. In the event that a water and/or sewer franchise is granted to the Quail Creek Developers or their successors or assigns, requirements set forth in the franchise documents shall be controlling where they are at variance with the above listed policy requirements. -19- ":DA-20D5-AR-7152, PUD Document,9-30-05 Packet Page -76- 3/25/2014 9.A. • 4.3 WATER MANAGEMENT a. A detailed water management plan shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to the start of any construction. c. Tho Immokaloo Rood canal -sha4I bo improved along tho ontiro southerly b.g. Maintenance of the outflow canal and the weir within it shall be a continuing responsibility of the Quail Creek and/or Quail II organizational entities. 4.4 POLLING PLACES Pursuant to Section 2.6.30 of the Collier County Land Development Code, provision shall be made for the future use of building space within common areas for the purposes of accommodating the function of an electoral polling place. An agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, which shall be binding upon any and all successors in interest that acquire ownership of such common areas including homeowners' associations or tenants' associations. This agreement shall provide for said community recreation/public building/public room or similar common facility to be used for a polling place if determined to be necessary by the Supervisor of Elections. 4.5 PUD MONITORING An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Subsection 2.7.3.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code. -20- PUDA-2005-AR-7152, PUD Document,9-30-05 Packet Page -77- 8111D A 1NnOD aNV S31V1s3)r33UD iron° , 3/25/2014 9.A. 4r • I r-- z r /� W 1 N m v J N 1 i a r g 1 z Z O p C ■ W C o yr S Y . K +i O N zw o Lil N r. L . Z O 0 U V7 w LL1 •;1- . / O I—' a' < F- o N 0 C CI g z / - 1 Q w Q w o w = o a J o $�LL( 0 Q O lr N w U m 0 ..0'..-' J Zn w Q N Q En'',,,s,, ,,,,.,. m 7 W r m o N 2 K Z O LL C C u Z N ! W 't S 2 J �': :v m O v w Q 5 O c o LL= COMMERCIAL '` a ln a. LL COMMERCIAL >a 3 2 k- `� -- - 100'CANA_RIGHT OF W`,Y KALIF ROAD "A" rr i h Exbt ^ Packet Page -78- Exhibit l 11 3/25/2014 9.A. STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of : ORDINANCE NO. 2005-52 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 11th day of October 2005, during Regular Session. ,,, WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 18th day of October 2005 . DWIGHT E. BROCK , Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex-officio to Board of County Commissioners , l/ - / ':. -n : Heidi R.;, Rockhold, Deputy Clerk . , New Packet Page -79- „ 11 ■ ■"”" 3/25/2014 9.A. r? . Y"P.' ORDINANCE 92- 41 .l.,, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER '',-.1,t,' 91-102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND • ' . DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE co v UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING m n _n ATLAS MAPS NUMBERED 8620N AND 8620S BY a _. ' ,. CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE = — (-- HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "PUD" O VI ni TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN " -v C.) AS QUAIL II, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE s x • NORTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD (C.R. 846) , rn��21m123�� APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE EAST OF I-75, • IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE t " 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, 1.^ t ?6,a' CONSISTING OF 194 ACRES, MORE OR LESS; S.° Nm PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-68, AS AMENDED; THE FORMER 8 to QUAIL II PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN yy, EFFECTIVE DATE. e 7 ~ 1 C99ti WHEREAS, William R. Vines of Vines & Associates, Inc., ."1 representing North Naples Utilities, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning 9 '. � �',, classification of the herein described real property; NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY "T COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; t • SECTION ONE: } The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property located in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 26 ,' East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "PUD" to "PUD" • Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein ' ` . and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas • Maps Numbered 8620N and 8620S, as described in Ordinance r3.;` Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, are i ! '` hereby amended accordingly. *6.' SECTION TWO: ■ '- Ordinance Number 82-68, as amended, known as the Quail .1. s,,,. IT PUD, adopted on August 10, 1982, by the Board of County h Commissioners of Collier County is hereby repealed in its :', entirety. ��;t BOOK 1153 "31O rlr�. PIS.. 4ri,• 4?.. -1- 111. . ri ti .k Packet Page-80- • tt 3/25/2014 9.A. • ` SECTION THREES " ,/c. This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice from_the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has • been filad• ith the Secretary of• State. PASSED-AND DULY ADOPTED by-the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this /L day of k , ?ir,,.e----/ , 1992. �,, s *�C' '' ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS• • J Es, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA••E,r • 10. • • �- •Z i BY: IHAVfrE, CHAIRMAN t FORM AND ti, . O E•X. STUDENT 111.rt.�_ "',,,;; ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY '' PUD-82-2O(3) ORDINANCE • -.'1.'nb/?023 •i �.,•'!• _ o _.... . . ... _ This ordinance filed with the it Secr ry of he's Office`'""" and ocknaw meat • that 4 f received i� day 4.1x_ r a : 9 N:. .. ..J . 1 . •. •.. , A•,. I Y T. %.('!� :t''.. ti.. 4.,.,. Boar 1153 PAGE 311 ';'..L"..'% —2— h .M' ' ' Packet Page-81- , • 3/25/2014 9.A. ` • , 4 it. • 4 ; QUAIL II• ,, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT e 4s. ::''5°.'. y' PREPARED BY: i ,.:cr VINES & ASSOCIATES, INC. . r 715 TENTH STREET SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 33940 .4:' PHONE: (813) 262-4164 I t,'" • 4' :. DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC 2/20/92• DATE APPROVED BY BCC 6/16/92 • ORDINANCE NUMBER 92-41 AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL . t` • t ,'''r. EXHIBIT "A" *.h- -,,• c tow 1153 mi-312 t ..,,:iii: —Packet Page-82- 3/25/2014 9.A. 1 T•L L. f •k' ! -11 - :ABLE OP CONTENTS f . jr 1 �;,• SECTION I STATEMENT OP COMPLIANCE l.l'1.. WITH GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 {%t' SECTION II PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 1 J" SECTION III PERMITTED USES AND 4 t' 'T.:',. ., , DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT 9 COMMITMENTS . ' -i. 1 . i, . POD ?CASTER PLAN Attachment 1 tr'Vii;.: il PI 41.-i� , 1 ... aa . ,{ , . r ; i . �r y. .4 4 • :� ;,;: •'.:+ �• fix. r X53 vxc�•313 F:. n y. Packet Page-83- 3/25/2014 9.A. . .r 1• j.. SECTION I • STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN Vic; This PUD has been deemed "improved" as defined in the Collier County Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance (Ordinance No. 90-23) . Therefore, pursuant to Policy 5.1 of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, this PUD is consistent with the Future Land Use Element. lr LI: • r 1r 1f • aR `. l.lt 1 >fY y -1- yr• no( 53 ppv.3 14 Packet Page-84- 3/25/2014 9.A. r li. `{ ,:.:. SECTION XI L. °~~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION • � ' 2.1 DISTRICT BONE: POD: 1 :: This project may be comprised of a mixture of commercial uses, residential uses, and community facilities. 2.2 H11IMUM'DWELLING OBITS: a. Total dwelling unit count in the areas designated as residential and future residential on the Master /-,. I :" Development Plan shall not exceed 360 units. b. The area designated as "Temporary Sewage Treatment •' Site, Future Residential and/or Community Facilities" on the revised PUD Master Plan (dated : • October 30, 1991) shall be limited to a maximum of 60 dwelling units. c. Total dwelling unit count on lands abutting the i golf course shall not exceed 300. f 2.3 pWELLING UNIT DISTRIBUTION: R ', Prior to issuance of building permits for dwelling units, a detailed plan showing building locations, building heights, number of dwelling units per building, access drives and offstreet parking shall be prepared, :� submitted to, and approved by the Director. 2.4 $UBDIQISION MASTER PLAN: 41, The approved Quail II Master Plan shall constitute the• approved Subdivision Master Plan or Preliminary ," Subdivision Plat, as appropriate, for the golf course and residential complex. A Subdivision Master Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat, as appropriate, for the commercially designated property shall be submitted to P the County for administrative review by staff. The plan shall meet the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the PUD Document. , 2.5 $XCEPTIONB TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS: • a. Article X, Section 19: Street name signs shall be t. approved by the County Engineer, but need not meet ts , the U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Manual of Uniform Traffic r ,," -2- .. , i ., ,,.. :'f 6W P53PAGt315 . 4:s!s. 14. Packet Page -85- ---- 3/25/2014 9.A. •I . Control Devices. Street pavement painting, striping, and reflective edging requirements shall be waived. b. Article X, Section 24: The requirement to place ... permanent reference monuments and permanent control points----in a typical water valve cover where such monuments occur within the street pavement areas shall, be waived. 4 RA71atrtAgle-1XI, Section 17P. & G.: All streets other than—Ca-existing principal entrance drive shall be •1•;- classified as local. Local streets shall be comprised of a 20 ft. wide travelway within a 50 ft. Wide privately. owned street right of way commons. d. Article XI, Section 17.H: The 1,000 ft. maximum dead-end street length requirement shall be waived. An emergency vehicle access way shall be provided which connects the southernmost residential access drive to Valewood Drive. e. Article XI, Section 17.1: The requirement for curbs at all residential street intersections shall be 7, -- - waived and concrete valley gutters shall be permitted as a substitute, except at intersections of the residential streets with Valewood Drive or • SR 846. Edge of pavement radii at street intersections shall be 30 ft. f. Article XI, Section 17.K: The requirement for 100 ft. tangent sections between reverse curves of • streets shall be waived. g. Article XI, Section 21: The requirement for blank utility casings shall be waived. • 11' BOCK 1153 ArA316 -3- ,^4 • • ••*- • 411110 Packet Page-86- 3/25/2014 9.A. 0'4 rtf' SECTION III 1. PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS : 3.1 RZSIDENTIAL AREA a. Permitted Uses and Structures: 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: Attached and detached single family structures; multi-family dwellings; recreational open space; golf course and golf club complex, including indoor and outdoor `yx social, recreational, dining, and service facilities; golf course maintenance facilities. 2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures which are customary in golf course and multi-family residential communities; administrative, sales r and rental offices, which offices may be located in temporary or permanent structures; access control gates at points of residential a,, street connection with Valewood Drive. b. Development Standards: 1 . 1. Residential Areas: a) Minimum building setback from street: 50 ./ ft. from back of curb for 3- or 4-story multi-family structures; 40 ft. from back of curb for 2-story single family or t . multi-family structures; 30 ft. from back of curb of 1-story single family or multi-family structures; 20 ft. from back of curb for garages and other accessory structures, whether freestanding or attached to a residence. b) Minimum setbacks of structures from golf course: None. .•v c) Minimum separation between adjoining 1- and/or 2-story structures: 8 ft. r,is r tot ( 5, P■q 317 , i.' . 'Ot:.. • Packet Page-87- _____ 3/25/2014 9.A. t. 4 h1 i;• r d) Minimum separation between a principal structure and its accessory structures: ' 5 ft. unless structurally joined. yj e) Minimum separation between accessory structures: 5 ft. unless structurally joined. f) Minimum side yards for all other . •r,. circumstances other than between I adjoining 1- and/or 2-story structures: : One-half the building height, but not less than 15 ft. g) Maximum building height: Four living. :.., floors. h) Minimum dwelling unit floor area: 1,000 sq. ft. i) Minimum offstreet parking spaces: 2 /-' spaces per dwelling unit. j) In the case of cluster buildings with a common architectural theme, the above distances may be reduced provided the ' site plan is approved by the Community Development Director. A 2. Golf Course and Golf Club Areas: 0% a) Maximum golf club building height: 2 stories. b) Minimum separation between clubhouse and street: 75 ft. from back of curb. c) Minimum separation between tennis courts `or other recreational equipment from back .,4 of curb: 25 ft. d) Minimum separation between a community swimming pool or community recreation " structure and street: 25 ft. from back of curb. , • •c :r. ":' f -5- ' 6 BOCK n53 Pl.t 3.18 1 : 3/25/2014 9.A. -1, ti: 1 10' ;, ;- e. Minimum separation between clubhouse, other recreation building, pool, tennis court, or other recreation equipment and a residential structure: 25 ft. • 3.2 -4r9 • . . = 4./.t ' M. M. -14 • nW 9: • -4+Y . :r. AND/OR COMMUNITY FACILITIES AREA tii a. Permitted Uses and Structures: 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: Temporary-sewage-treatment plant; attached and detached single family structures; and multi- t: family dwellings. • ' 74'. 2. Permitted Conditional Uses and Structures: t:' The following-.uses listed under Section 2.2.19, Community Facility District, of the Collier County Land Development Code: child f' ' care centers, churches and houses of worship, civic and cultural facilities, museums, tr `, nursing homes and adult congregate living tr, facilities (ACLFs) in accordance with Section 2.6.26, Location Requirements for Group 2 Housing, of the Collier County Land u Development Cods and Policy 5.8 of the Future `i' Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, parks and playgrounds, A- ',/ non-commercial recreation facilities, open space uses, tennis facilities, community centers, private clubs, and social and fraternal organizations; and residential ' facilities for elderly persons in accordance with Policy 5.8 of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. • 4. V 3. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures which are customary in multi-family residential ` communities; and in association with community facilities; administrative, sales and rental offices, which offices may be located in temporary or permanent structures; access 1, control gates at points of residential street �'. connection with Valewood Drive. Y, I -6 .*+` y^ SOOK (153 PAPA 319 l.r t t ti \ 1 Packet Page-89- ..__-__ 3/25/2014 9.A. i .% l • b. Development Standards: • .41. For residential development, as required by the ». '. development standards listed under Paragraph _.. 214".1:..:3-44.1:.::::,-.::. Section III, . Permitted , Uses and • Develtip_ment Standards, of the Quail II PUD Document; for permitted community facilities development,_ as required by the development standards listed under Section 2.2.19, Community Facility . District, of the Collier County Land Development--•Code;• for residential facilities for yam, elderly.: persons, in accordance with Policy 5.8 of �, the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, as established during the Site Development Plan approval process, however, no r "J; building shall be higher than 30 ft. in height. i • '. .,. 2.3 CO}Q[LRCIAL AP. AS n . a. Permitted Uses and Structures: .. �'< 1. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: i .4.- Commercial uses as listed in the C-3, � ,`. Commercial Intermediate District, provided that ' automobile service stations may n: incorporate convenience food and beverage .1, sales and mechanical car wash facilities. Automobile service stations shall otherwise comply with the standards set forth in Section y 2:.6.2.8_ of the Collier County Land Development Code. Residential facilities for elderly persons in accordance with Policy 5.8 of the Future Land !`. Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan are permitted. Nursing homes and adult congregate living facilities (ACLFs) • in accordance with Section 2.6.26, Location Requirements for Group Housing, of the Collier • County Land Development Code and Policy 5.8 of ithe Future Land Use Element of the Collier :, County Growth Management Plan are also h;: . permitted. 1 S W _7- .6 tou 1 r1:5 j PAGE 320 ; . • . ...r.ju,' • ," Packet Page-90 ----- - -- 3/25/2014 9.A • • , f L 2. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures which are . .. customary in commercial areas; administrative, sales and rental offices, which offices may be '< - - -located in temporary or permanent structures; f: access control gates at points of residential VT • - street connection with Valewood Drive. b. Development Standards: -- e,r Yard • •:requirements, • building height, minimum bnllding-tloor•area, landscape•requirements, signs, •litlhts;'•-•anti related development' features shall be /' subject to development plan approval as sat forth 1 in Division 3.3 of the Collier County Land :..;.... .Development Code. The • C-3, Commerical Intermediate District, regulations shall be the controlling standards used f ;, to determine whether or not development plan approval shall be granted. • • • • • 1 '$ t i,• _8- soap 1153 ME 321 • p:! IA'7- Packet Page -91- ___ 3/25/2014 9.A. SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 4.1 TRATTIC IMPROVEMENTS a. The developer shall provide separate left and right turn storage lanes on Immokalee Road at the eastern entrance to the commercial area. • b. The developer or his successor in title shall make a fair share contribution toward the capital cost ^'; of. ,traffic signals at either or both access points to-. SR 846, when deemed warranted by the County ` ' Engineer. The signals will be owned, operated, and maintained by Collier County. �; 1T c. Lakes shall have a minimum separation of 100 ft. • between top of bank and the nearest street right of way, or shall be separated from the nearest street by an approved physical barrier. 41 d. Space shall be reserved to permit a future minor street connection between Valewood Drive and lands y, to the east, provided, however, that such street connection may not be the principal access point to lands to the east unless such principal access is authorized by the Quail Creek/Quail II development organization. 4.2 YTILITIES a. All on-site and off-site utility facilities constructed by the developer in connection with the development shall be constructed to County standards at no cost to the County and shall be deeded to the County Water-Sewer District in accordance with applicable County ordinances and • a regulations. • i';. b. All customer connections to the sanitary sewer and water distribution facilities will be customers of the County Water-Sewer District and will be billed ! in accordance with a County approved rate {({l .` •� structure. • 1` •-N rtt I , Packet Page-92- r___ 3/25/2014 9.A. k -.‘!.,f7; +r C. All construction plans and technical specifications f :1 .. !. ' for the proposed utility facilities must be r. reviewed and approved:by the Utility Division prior to commencement of construction. . rg. . .i4.:'' d•r• -As -proposed, the rights-of-way within the project 'will ' be privately owned and maintained. Appropriate utility easements dedicated to the County Water-Sewer District must be provided for the. proposed water and sewer facilities to be ;;,; . constructed. • e. A11_,construction on . the proposed sanitary sewer 4, system:.shall utilize proper.methc�ds and materials ,;;', to insure water,tigh£,conditions" f. Data. •required under County Ordinance No. 80-112 must be submitted and approval granted prior to !•r s : approval of the construction documents for the . project. Submit a copy of the approved DER permit l'';'. application for the sewage collection and • ' transmission system and a copy of the approved DER permit application and operating permit for the .a'. wastewater treatment facility to be utilized, along 1 j;. with the data required for Ordinance No. 80-112. g. All construction plans and technical specifications ' for the plant relocation, transfer pump station, . it; force main and pump design data must be reviewed and approved by the Utility Division prior to commencement of construction. h. Additional Conditions: 1. If required by applicable County Ordinance, connection to the County's Central Water and Sewer facilities will be made by the owners, At their assigns or successors, at no cost to the > ,44.1 County or the County Water-Sewer District, within 90 days after such facilities become available. 2. The owners, their assigns or successors shall pay all system development charges at the time that building permits or connections to the County's central Water and Sewer facilities r are requested, whichever is applicable, 's, . pursuant to the appropriate County Ordinances 1 ,.•,, and Regulations in effect at the time of permit or connection request. Note: The above utilities related requirements are 4t: extracted from Utilities Manager, I.R. Berzon's memo of - -10- MMK (153 323 1 . ;w• Packet Page-93- • - •: 3/25/2014 9.A. . .:,-• • • II '''. May 10, 1982 to Mary Lee Kirchoff, Planning Department. The requirements are intended to represent current , county Utilities policy. In the event that County policy or 'Ordinances regarding utilities are modified, the modified policy and/or ordinance requirements shall be applicable. In the event that a water and/or sewer ti` :• franchise is granted to the Quail Creek Developers or their successors or assigns, requirements set forth in "='' • the franchise- documents shall be controlling where they are at variance with the above listed policy requirement's'.- -- - Fe? 4.3 WATER MANAGEMENT - - : I'r v'1%.a . A detailed water management plan shall be submitted , t to theeCoUnty Engineer for approval prior to the start of any construction. t • ; b. A weir control structure shall be provided by the "% developer on the project outfall canal near the Immokalee Road canal. i ': • - ••c. The Immokalee Road canal shall be improved along the entire southerly boundary of the Quail II t project. • { c:`+. d. Mhintenance of the outflow canal and the weir i 1,:.. within it shall be a continuing responsibility of the Quail Creek and/or Quail II organizational entities. ;; , 4.4 POLLING PLACES dry' Pursuant to Section 2.6.30 of the Collier County Land ` Development Code, provision shall be made for the future use of building space within common areas for the purposes of accommodating the function of an electoral polling place. An agreement shall be recorded in the official records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, which shall be binding upon any and all successors in pc':. interest that acquire ownership of such common areas including homeowners' associations or tenants' associations. This agreement shall provide for said a., community recreation/public building/public room or tr.. similar common facility to be used for a polling place A . if determined to be necessary by the Supervisor of Elections. } —11— i ::w' f '� `' DON 1153?AU 324 Packet Page -94- war MIN In 3/25/2014 9.A. •• i '•-• • , • = 4.5 POD MON/TORINQ An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Subsection 2.7.3.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code. • ••• I' • QUAILAI PUD,DOCUMENT/PJS/md • . 1 • • • • • •4', ; • •• r • : t I •: ' • t , Z ; •>„. 1 ' .4,•••.! • I .•. , -12 • ••,;'• *, • ' • boog 1153 Pa; 325 . , c • ••• Packet Page-95- 3/25/2014 9.A. • ft • QUAIL II PUD MASTER PLAN A Portion of S.etion 20,TWP.4;S•R.26E, r..•ac �- • ,•mwr rLa. .no+ caw.n r.oma K>�..0 111[3106014. oocl[Door �_� oar COMM wesioarruL • ° 3 S oov ax.o� 3 I; 1.01.1/w t T n 7 i - uwao1.1 Nsf l0-30-91 • r Packet Page-96- 3/25/2014 9.A. ( k,. f � STATE OF FLORIDA ) } •• * ,COUNTY OF COLLIER ) RS of. I, JAMES C. GILES, Clerk of Courts in and for the t .= � Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do j`` hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of 4 Ordinance No. 92-41 -rat which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the l6nd day of June, 1992, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of ICounty Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 23rd day of June, 1992. .i• JAMES C. GILES +,•+: ).. ;2,• Clerk of Courts and Clerk '-: Ex-officio to Board of !� . _;. County Commissioners •: • • • • By: /s/Maureen Kenyon— Deputy Clerk • .' • I. . '. _ . . : aoo( n53 P1 :327 ,, • { 7,∎•• . ;Y k. . r/l Packet Page-97- "� -' 3/25/2014 9.A. auk U _ _ R — 1 \01 -4/R11-- vii a i :ea.. .1 E, 4.6.:1 ...... - - - „ . 3 ►� i0i ♦ 4�► at.'a_=�_.ag‘ „1111 ■� . 46 -- -- Q ollity 77.!.77.7:7•*4i::::::::::1:::nii.:77.10':::''..!:::::':.:::::::.::::::: :::: :::::H:::':::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 11:::::::: "H.:. i Ct. W*74 ,!i !..: l'El :i....:.:::! ""'''” !!w"Hli 1::,:ift,!.'*:: . '::,;'it11111111:111111111111111 M.:::::ii ' SNP 0. a , ,` o ` _ - = V - o i Z ■ ) N N G �, te. iis AO1 ivo oVn xi (-) Ga 'DAIS 9MVD 1 F � 3 UM, 1 m gam— �� R r _j '. 1E1 i Grcs —2 i _ G] o E. CV ° , ; 111 - / 1, 1( • .._ a 3MOS Ol LDN n Aill n z 30. o ve 030 NtltlJ 33� :IA 6 q B im 000031008 83111OO l96 00 I- ��--II & ms 8 o3 ,wN �- n_ Z = ar ODDMl3bDVl „ ° o= b —II 3WJ 581 ° s rz C.) o s= .. < °Qo .1" W N p° ,Wax -<n C sp. a "o 8I i u g 8W' °m' G c m °h n : 1 R 00V/13100R NVDOI ° rc 1 ° Z W rc O Y 9 2 w % i < ae 0 • l' w m U Nol?NLLNDH i o SL-31tl15a31N1 I U J Bnb 1+llNnD�A 5105®�l O $L"31tl1$a31N1 s-i- . ^m_ Me" HI W. ELI' m 1 J ° E . LNINGSTON ROAD F m gay (Itl0) rN� u'R m 11.1. NYJf13e1 �g m m \v, o - u t > a ¢ g CL m /6 s �m\^ zs_ W' W 'j' OtlOa NOLSONINI y � V a3J N n I i m sm mm °g D g ui f F ; Fm ' I" Lag °VOx ONTalboabN c '' a., Packet Page-98- TKOs= 3/25/2014 9.A. MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY / / / / FOR R-1 DISTRICT: UP TO 152 MULTI-FAMILY OR 87 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS (INCLUDES ATTACHED, DETACHED, ZERO LOT LINE, TWO-FAMILY ATTACHED AND DUPLEX) AS DESCRIBED IN QUAIL II PUD ORDINANCE, / // / SECTION 3.4. / / / 5' BUFFER MAY BE REDUCED TO 10'IF DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. / / / DEVIATIONS / / / n AMENITY 1L-I SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02,"BUFFER REQUIREMENTS",WHICH REQUIRES A / / / 15-FOOT WIDE TYPE'B'BUFFER BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES TO PERMIT A / AREA 10-FOOT WIDE TYPE'B'BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTHERN PROJECT BOUNDARY. / / SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SUBSECTION 6.06.02.A,"SIDEWALKS,BIKE LANE /.�\fi AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS", WHICH REQUIRES SIDEWALKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON BOTH SIDES OF LOCAL STREETS,TO ALLOW SIDEWALKS, 5-FOOT IN WIDTH, ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET ONLY FOR PRIVATE ,��i STREETS. THIS DEVIATION SHALL BE APPLICABLE FOR THE SINGLE / / FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OPTION ONLY. /Vj'� ©© SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SUBSECTION / / / 6.06.01.N, "STREET SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS" ///- / / AND"APPENDIX B",TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS // �\ AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DESIGN STANDARDS, / / / WHICH ESTABLISHES A 60-FOOT WIDE LOCAL �/ / / w tn ROAD TO ALLOW A MINIMUM 50-FOOT WIDE/ / / / / I v PRIVATE ROAD.(PREVIOUSLY APPROVED) / / / / / / Z CI 112 o QUAIL CREEK / 15'TYPE 'B' FFE� y ESTATES AND /,- / \W/6'- 8'NIGHWALL* \ \ w COUNTRY CLUB �/ / / 1 I 15 'TYPE 'B'IBU FER* Y -J J —J(PUD) ,//// / I / / / / 21 .74 .± / / R-1 DI S IC T 0 ,/ 1 � z J ERII i / � ©o - - —� - 1 ■ z ° - - - - // //I �I ° Et ,/ - - -- I ` 7 . / 10'TYPE 'B' BUFFER _ I Q© E n W/6'- 8' HIGH WALL ° i I I I ' � cc Q I I COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES I — J Es 8 1 I L I /- DEctiv!` iYE_ -- - -=�� I I -_-_-------- , .... ( I N ki I I ' i a. II COCOHATCHEE CANAL g J (100' R/W) -- -- --- --- --- 0 ioo 200' SCALE: 1"=200' — — — — — IMMOKALEE ROAD QUAIL II PUD BE.,. ,•=zRR ©G ra dyMinor Grady Minor Bnn A01)Via 1)0 Re JOB CODE: BOO 510 1)01 ems. lioniia$nringB,Florida 31131 EXHIBIT B LATE: OCTOBER 0010(RCVS) Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners . Landscape Architects R-I DISTRICT RILE NAME: o Fort.of Au0.ER 111015151 Curl"l none.La 0005151 Business LC 261100266 VASTER PLAN £x581.a-MCP Bonita Wings:239917.1114 ivu n'.6 ra AVM in or.rnm Fort.Myers:239.690.4380 SHEET 1 OF 1 Packet Page-99- 3/25/2014 9.A. * onjshoceLke January 23,2014 Nancy Gundlach Sent via email:Nancyuundlach@u.colliergov.net Dear Ms.Gundlach: Attached is the paper for the Planning Commissioners. The Longshore Lake Foundation has reviewed the Amendments to the Quail II PUD ordinance 05-52. We have issues with some of the proposed changes and submit the attached document for inclusion with the information provided to the Collier County Planning Commissioners prior to their February 6th meeting on this Ordinance. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Longshore Lake Foundation,Inc. eA Peter R. Rach President PRR/skm Enclosure/I • Longshore Lake Foundation,Inc. 11399 Phoenix Way,Naples,Fl 34119.239-566-2304 Packet Page-100- 3/25/2014 9.A. Longshore Lake Comments on the Amendment to Quail H PUD Ordinance 05-52 Plannftln Commi,ss:on !,,Itr=eting 2/6114 Longshore Lake is the community on the eastern de of the Quail il PUD. We have a common boundary with the Quail II property of about 1450 feet. In reviewing the Amended Ordinance, we hava concerns and issues with some of the proposed changes. Longshore Lake residents met with representatives from a Grady Minor and Associates and Toll Brothers in November 2013 te discuss the proposed PUD chances. Toil Brothers agreed to look into seve7al di'our issues and we still hope to have a positive resolution. The Longshore Lake issues on the PUD Amendment are provided. 1. Single-family, Multi-family or both. We questioned the statement: "The developer has elected to construct up to 57 attached or detached units or up to 152 multi-family units in the R--/ Dlstriotr It was uncleaF o us whether the singles-family and mufti-family units'could be mixed within the property. We did not want a mixed development. The Toll Brothers representatives told us it would be either all single-family or all multi- family, but not a mixture of both. We suggest making that clear in the Ordinance. 2. Construction Entrance. We asked use Executive Drive for thtair construction entrance. They stated tha, was their intent. 3. Deceleration Lane_ We wanted a Decat!-etion right turn lane on Valewood Drive into the QuaLU U property. Traf- o on Ve± cod is heavy and the speed differetial between turning vehicles and tilicu0 t:affic is 7:onsidehz,,d a safety issue, esp&oially at the Quail I/ entrance where ‘,/ae ::tc:::d curv,es, mtg visibility. Toll Brothers did not see the need tor a deceleration lane, however, it is our understanding that the COLIF4 Tu7nsportatil i7.;,-.:pehm ant is requiring the right turn deceleration lane. 4. Lake issues. Stormoia':er rno!f the Ouai pro;./er:y will drain into our Ls :e. The current PLO, under Devebne.i r,ommitTmant , 'The development contribute its PTC.)}:33Li()rj nhsn . e :e maiiteriar:ce-, for storn-,w2tr management to L.r.mo,:;hc,:.3 We would like to change the PUD language to add: contribute 12% for lake _ maintenance, 'Tt. -,..)al-,_ran!?c;erocrt .f.7-nd eT,ens:for sterrnwater management. This language would recogni7e that Quail U F--,tomiwater runoff has a 12% effect on all aspects of our fake's ne.alth to maintenance, periodic rep-ar or Longshore Lake FOUnC10.2;.V., Ino. -11399 f'houlDj.x WLy, arhs, Fl 34119 239-566-2304 Packet Page -101- 3/25/2014 9.A.1 replacement of lake management equipment and occasional improvements. This change would formalize the current accommodation where the Quail II owner has been contributing 12% to lake management improvements, including the purchase of aerators in 2013, and it would avoid future confusion after developer turnover to the homeowners association. 5. Amenity Area. The planned Amenity area is immediately adjacent to the Longshore Lake wall, at the northeastern corner. We asked what amenities were planned and the Toll Brothers representatives said it could be a pool or something else. We are concerned about noise immediately next to Longshore residents. In researching the 2005 Ordinance changes, we discovered that, when the property was rezoned from Commercial to Residential—Multifamily, language was included in the PUD to address this issue: "Recreation facilities within the development shall be ' centrally located toward the middle of the property." The proposed PUD Amendment removes "centrally located"and places the Amenity Area immediately adjacent to Longshore residents. 6. The wall between Lonqshore and Quail II. The current PUD'states: "The Longshore Lake wall on the East Side of Valewood Village has a gap at the Valewood Villages' far northeast corner. This gap shall be filled with a new wall, matching the existing Longshore Lake walls' height, building material and color constructed by the Valewood Village developer." We anticipate that the developer will construct the "gap"wall, which is currently a chainlink fence about 170 feet long. However, we are concerned about the existing "slat" concrete wall located south of the gap that continues for approximately 800 feet to the south end of the Quail II property. This wall was constructed in 1996 and is showing its age. Once homes in Quail H are constructed, wall replacement will be very difficult and costly, since the wall will be wedged between two rows of homes_ We request that the developer replace the "slat" concrete wall during their construction of the "gap"wall. A new wall would enhance the value of their property (rather than have the back of their homes facing a deteriorating, unattractive wall), eliminate disruption to their home buyers (from a future wall replacement) and recognize the value of the remaining useful life of the existing wall to Longshore (a value that would be foregone if the wall has to be replaced early— before Quail H construction). At our meeting in November, Toll Brothers representatives said that replacing the wall was not in their budget. However, they agreed to review this option to see if they could do anything. Longshoze Lake Foundation,Inc. 1 1399 Phoenix Way,Naples,Fl 34119. 239-566-2304 Packet Page-102- 3/25/2014 9.A. Conclusion These are the issues and concerns of the residents of Longshore Lake. We are an established community with 566 homesites. We would like to be a good neighbor to the Quail 11 development and would like to work with the developers to resolve our issues. Longshore Lake Foundation,Inc. 11399 Phoenix Way,Naples,Fl34119.239-566-2304 Packet Page -103- 3/25/2014 9.A. 11655 Quail Village Way QUAILCREEK UAIL Naples,9) 9 -9 Florida 34119 Q .•� Q (239)598-9972 Admin. J (239)598-3972 Clubhouse VILLAGE VILLAGE (239)598-9922 Pro Shop (239)598-1430 Fax FOUNDATION, INC. GOLF CLUB www.quailcreekvillage.org • January 23, 2014. Nancy Gundlach,AICP, RLA Principal Planner Land Development Services Growth Management Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Via: nancygundlach@colliergov.net Re: Objection to Proposed Changes to Quail II PUD(Ordinance 05-52) Dear Nancy, As you know the Quail Creek Village community is located within the Quail II PUD, which currently has amendments pending approval. I am writing to express that there are several areas in the proposed amendment, which we oppose. 1) We do not wartt a t 'xed development and would ask that the 152 units be struck from the amendment and the "up to 87 single-family units attached or detached"remain, as this better reflects other homes that currently exist in the Quail II PUD. 2) We want the amendments to spell out that the construction entrance will be located on Executive Drive. 3) We want a deco eration lane installed on Valewood Drive for Northbound traffic entering this property. 4) The Amenity Area should remain in the center of the property as it is currently spelled out in the Quail II PUD. This would help to ensure that any noise pollution generated by use of the amenity would stay within zi.e ti-1 District. We realize that our neighboring communities have additional concerns. Please know that Quail Creek Village strong y supports the positions of our neighboring communities. Packet Page-104- 3/25/2014 9.A. Kin•. t ' • ds, A1Accorsini, President Quail Creek Village Foundation cc: Commissioner Torn Henning, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303, Naples,FL 34112.5746 Packet Page-105- 3/25/2014 9.A. GundlachNancy From: Quail Creek Estates-David L. Govanus[quailcreekestates @embargmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 2:21 PM To: GundlachNancy Subject: Quail Creek Property Owners Association Re: Quail II PUD Attachments: PUD Ordinance 05-52 QUAIL II .pdf Importance: High January 24, 2014 Nancy Gundlach Principal Planner, Planning & Zoning Department Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Dear Nancy, The Board of Directors for Quail Creek Property Owners Association has the following concerns regarding the proposed Amendment to the Quail II Ordinance 05-52: 1. Lack of deceleration lane for the entrance on Valewood Drive. Both Longshore Lake and Quail Village have deceleration lanes for safety reasons. Vehicles making 90% turns to enter any community on Valewood drive will cause dangerous conditions for other vehicles unless there are deceleration lanes. We understand that Mark Strain and Reed Jarvi at Collier County Department of Transportation have confirmed this position and have recommended the installation of a deceleration lane on Valewood Drive for Quail II. The'requirement for the deceleration lane has been reviewed and discussed extensively, see attached Quail II PUD in 2005, Ordinance No. 05-52 October 11, 2005 Page 15 D -11. However, the proposed PUD contains no such proposal. 2. Lack of plan to require construction vehicles use the entrance on Executive Drive. Valewood Drive would be a dangerous roadway for construction vehicles entering and leaving Quail II under development. The secondary entry on Executive Drive would be ideal for construction and service vehicles. The proposed PUD should contain such a requirement. 3. Lack of certainty. This property has had three major changes in its PUD structure in the last several years, causing adverse market conditions to adjacent property values due to uncertainty of the type of PUD development. We request that the developer choose either single family or multi-family for this development, and the PUD reflect only one such development. The PUD should not contain a continuing option to elect one or the other type of development. The PUD should allow only one future development, not two possible developments. 1 Packet Page-106- 3/25/2014 9.A. Thank your for you continued assistance, David L. Govanus CAM 3eneral Manager Quail Creek Estates 4886 Pond Apple Drive South Naples, Florida 34119 239.594.6966 2 Packet Page-107- - 3/25/2014 9.A. •26D )) Wednesday, March 5, 2014 )) NAPLES fl A i LY NEWS • 000, • • NOTICE OF MEETING NOTICE OF MEETING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, March 25, 2014, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of County Ordinances. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The titles of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER • COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBERS 92-41 AND 05-52, THE QUAIL II PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD),, TO ALLOW 87 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED, ATTACHED AND ZERO LOT .LINE UNITS OR 152 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS AS PERMITTED USES IN THE'RESIDENTIAL (R-1) DISTRICT BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, AMENDMENTS TO COVER PAGE; SECTION TWO, AMENDMENTS TO THE TABLE OF CONTENTS/EXHIBITS PAGE; SECTION THREE, AMENDMENT TO STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION; SECTION FOUR, AMENDMENTS TO PROJECT DESCRIPTION SECTION; SECTION FIVE, AMENDMENTS •TO PERMITTED USES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION 'INCLUDING A . REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND REMOVAL OF REQUIREMENT TO CONTRIBUTE TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND FOR UNITS DEVELOPED IN R-1 DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR ADDITION OF DEVIATIONS; SECTION SIX, AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT A, THE PUD MASTER PLAN AND ADDITION OF EXHIBIT B, R-1 DISTRICT MASTER PLAN;EXHIBIT C,SIDEWALK EXHIBIT,EXHIBIT D,TURN LANE DETAIL;AND SECTION SEVEN, EFFECTIVE DATE.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY I5 LOCATED NORTH OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND EAST OF VALEWOOD DRIVE IN SECTION 20,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. (PUDZ-A-PL20090001891). Copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If . recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written material intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. • Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure a verbatim record of the Proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and •evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the' Collier County Facilities—Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite #101, Building W, Naples, Florida 34112, (239) 252-8380. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the County Commissioners'Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA . • TOM HENNING,CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK _ • By: Teresa Cannon,Deputy Clerk (SEAL) • Marsh 5 2014 • Nn 2Q18571 i Packet Page -108- •