Loading...
HEX Agenda 02/22/2018AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2018 IN CONFERENCE ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING & REGULATION BUILDING, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED T O ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: NOTE: This item has been continued from the January 11, 2018 HEX Meeting and the January 25, 2018 HEX Meeting. A. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20160003482 – Distinctive Residential Development at Livingston, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2008-06, as amended, the Pezzettino Di Cielo RPUD, to add two deviations relating to landscape buffers and fence/wall height, to delete one deviation relating to cul de sac length, to modify development standards relating to minimum principal and accessory structure setbacks, to add a new cross section exhibit, and to revise the Master Plan to reconfigure the site layout. The subject property is located on the east side of Livingston Road, approximately one-half mile north of Veterans Memorial Boulevard, in Section 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of ±17.52 acres. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner] B. PETITION DR-PL20170002552 – Petitioner, RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc., requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks twelve deviations relating to minimum setback, signage, landscaping, buffer and architectural standards under the Land Development Code, for a proposed RaceTrac facility with fuel pumps redevelopment project, located on the northwest corner of U.S. 41 and Shadowlawn Drive, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Fred Reischl, Principal Planner] C. PETITION NO. ASW-PL20170003579 – RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc. requests a waiver from the minimum required separation of 500 feet between facilities with fuel pumps pursuant to Section 5.05.05 B of the Land Development Code, for property located on the northwest corner of U.S. 41 and Shadowlawn Drive, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Fred Reischl, Principal Planner] D. PETITION NO. VA-PL20170003718 – Jordan T. Donini and Jacquelyn E. Coppard request a variance from Section 4.02.01 A., Table 2.1 of the Land Development Code to reduce the minimum side yard setback for property zoned RSF-4 from the 6.5 feet previously approved by Administrative Variance to 4.7 feet from the eastern property line for the existing single family residence on Lot 8, Block C of the North Naples Highlands subdivision, also described as 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard, in Section 22, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 0.15+/- acres. [Coordinator: James Sabo, Principal Planner] 4. OTHER BUSINESS 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN AGENDA ITEM 3-A MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE : JANUARY 25, 2018 SUBJECT: PDI-PL20160003482 , PEZZITTINO DI CIELO RPUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) The petitiOn PDI-PL20160003482 , Pezzittino Di Cielo RPUD, was continued from the January 11 Hearing Examiner meeting to the January 25, 2018 hearing to address issues related to an easement located along the north property line. The agent has also revised the PUD Document and Deviation Justifications to: Clarify the type of plant material that will be in the shared landscape buffer easement. (See attached Deviations Justification #4 dated January 9, 2018 and PUD Document page 10, Deviation D, dated January 12, 2018.) Clarify and limit the application of the proposed 7.5-foot front yard setback to any lot with one front yard on Hardesty Road or Enclave Circle. (See attached PUD Document page 6, footnote# 8.) Clarify that the maximum 8-foot wall and berm height is composed of a 6-foot high wall on top of a 2-foot berm. (See attached PUD Document page 10, Deviation E, dated January 12, 2018.) The issues related to the easement located along the north property line are still being resolved. END OF MEMORANDUM PDI-PL20160003482, PEZZITTINO DI CIELO RPUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) January 16,2018 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 9/11/2014 Page 1 of 3 SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT LDC Section 10.02.03 F Ch. 6 I of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT: _________________________________________________________________ ADDRESS: ___________________________________CITY ___________ STATE _______ ZIP ________ TELEPHONE # __________________________CELL # _________________ FAX # _________________ E-MAIL ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF AGENT: _____________________________________________________________________ FIRM: ______________________________________________________________________________ ADDRESS: _______________________________CITY _______________ STATE _______ ZIP ________ TELEPHONE # _____________________________CELL # ___________________ FAX # ____________ E-MAIL ADDRESS: _____________________________________________________________________ CORRESPONDING SDP, SDPA, SIP INFORMATION This application shall be submitted in conjunction with one of the following: site development plan, site development plan amendment, or site improvement plan. PROJECT NAME/PL # IF KNOWN: ________________________________________________________ PLANNER/PROJECT MANAGER, IF KNOWN: ________________________________________________ DATE OF SUBMITTAL OF SDP/SDPA/SIP: __________________________________________________ To be completed by staff COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 9/11/2014 Page 2 of 3 INFORMATION REGARDING DEVIATION REQUESTS A site plan with deviations for redevelopment provides a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations (excluding height), architectural deviations, and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping, parking, and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings, structures, or site features nonconforming. A site plan with deviations may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan, site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03. Except for the requested deviations, the site plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03. In accordance with LDC section 10.02.03 F, “redevelopment” shall mean the renovation, restoration, or remodeling of a building or structure, or required infrastructure, in whole or in part, where the existing buildings, structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. DEVIATION REQUESTS The application must address the follow requirements. Please attach the required narratives and explanations. 1. A narrative of the redevelopment project and how it is consistent with the standards for approval, LDC section 10.02.03 F.7. 2. Description of each requested deviation and justification for each request. Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition. The LDC section for which the deviation seeks relief from shall be identified. 3. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly identified on the site plan and explanation provided. 4. Deviation Request types: Zoning Deviation Requests - Check all that may be impacted by the request.  Dimensional standards (excluding height):___________________________________________________  Parking  Architectural  Landscape / Buffers  Other site features: ____________________________________________________________________ Engineering Deviation Requests - Check all that may be impacted by the request.  Stormwater  Pathways  Transportation Planning Other site features: ____________________________________________________________________ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 9/11/2014 Page 3 of 3 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Site Development Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment Application 9 Completed SDP/SDPA/SIP application and all associated materials, including all site plan documents. 9 Copy for the Pre-Application Notes, if not submitted with SDP/SDPA/SIP 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Electronic Copy of all documents and plans on CD *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. Unless waived by the Project Manager. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARNG PROCESS: At the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. FEE REQUIREMENTS  Site Plan for Redevelopment: $1,000.00  Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 x x RACETRAC AT SHADOWLAWN NARRATIVE FOR: SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS Introduction: This application is for a Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment for the proposed RaceTrac convenience store with gasoline sales station located on the northwest corner of Shadowlawn Drive and US 41 in Naples, Florida. The request is for several deviations from the Land Development Code to accommodate redevelopment of several existing and vacant uses. The proposed RaceTrac property is an assemblage of four properties including the vacant service station on the corner of Shadowlawn Drive and US 41, the existing office building adjacent to the northeast fronting Shadowlawn, the existing service station to the northwest fronting US 41, and a portion of the existing ABC Liquor property. The properties, owners, and folio numbers are identified on the attached Parcel Info & Location Map. The existing structures within the proposed property were constructed between 1963 and 1988 based on the County records. This is well prior to current land development code regulations related to building setback and buffer and the establishment of specific LDC regulations for automobile service station which went into effect via Ordinance 98-063. Adjacent Uses: The proposed RaceTrac at Shadowlawn is surrounded by a variety of existing commercial uses. Immediately adjacent to the property is the ABC Liquor property to the northwest, and Naples Outfitters (outdoor/watersports retailer) to the northeast. Across Shadowlawn is the existing CVS Pharmacy on the corner of US 41 and existing residential properties to the north. Across US 41 is the Gulfgate Plaza retail center with a fast food (McDonald’s) outparcel and a former gas station on the hard corner of US 41 which was demolished around 2006. On the far corner diagonal from the proposed RaceTrac is an existing Kangaroo gas station. The existing adjacent uses are shown on the attached Aerial/Adjacent Uses exhibit. Proposed Project: The proposed RaceTrac at Shadowlawn project intends to redevelop several older properties that were developed well before the current landscape and architectural criteria was implemented. The two properties fronting US 41 are automobile service stations, one of which is vacant. Both have no landscape buffers, open space, or RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Site Plan with Deviations - 2 - stormwater management facilities. The Northern portion of the assembled property is an existing office use consisting of two buildings with limited architectural design. The fourth property of the assemblage is a portion of the existing ABC Liquor property, which will allow for improved site circulation and interconnection between the proposed RaceTrac and the existing ABC property. To maximum extent practicable, the proposed redevelopment has been designed consistent with the current Collier County Land Development Code. The project will maintain a consistent architectural theme throughout and will provide landscape buffer and open space. The redevelopment will provide improved transportation functionality at the intersection by creating an interconnect between the proposed RaceTrac and the ABC property, allowing the ABC property access to Shadowlawn. The project will also reduce the number of driveways on US 41 from four to one, located as far as possible from the Shadowlawn signal. The project has been oriented to minimize any impacts to the existing residential properties on Shadowlawn. The convenience store and fuel canopy both face US 41 and the building will shield the vehicular use areas. In addition, the dumpster enclosure is oriented to face away from residential, such that the opening is not visible and the rear of the structure provide additional buffering. The redevelopment of this property will also provide a stormwater management enhancement. The Gateway Triangle area has a history of drainage problems. Several years ago, the County made improvements including a storage pond and conveyance improvements to improve drainage in the area. Most properties in the area provide no water quality treatment or storm attenuation. The proposed site will provide dry detention areas that will exceed the water quality treatment requirements in the South Florida Water Management District Permit. The Standards for Approval of a Site Plan with Deviations as outlined in LDC 10.02.03.F.7. are addressed below: a. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district. The proposed RaceTrac is a convenience food and beverage and a facility with fuel pumps, both of which are permitted uses in the zoning district. Two of the properties included in the redevelopment are automobile service stations. A separation waiver will be required per LDC 5.05.05.B.1, and is being applied for concurrent ly with this Site Plan with Deviations. b. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The proposed project is within a CRA. The CRA encourages redevelopment and provides a mechanism to improve existing conditions. The proposed project is a RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Site Plan with Deviations - 3 - redevelopment project that enhances the overall area and is consistent with Growth Management Plan. c. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. As noted in the above narrative, the redevelopment of subject property will provide several benefits including improved transportation functionality, architectural design, landscaping, as well as stormwater management enhancements. d. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose. Adequate land area is available for the redevelopment of this property into a RaceTrac convenience store. Open space, stormwater management areas, and landscape buffers are provided. e. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sight distances, landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. Adequate facilities are provided as outlined in the above narrative. Adequate parking and maneuvering area is provided, a uniform architecture is provided, as are landscape buffers and water management facilities. f. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted. The visual character of the completed redevelopment will be greatly improved over the existing condition. The existing service stations within the project boundary front US 41 and have no architectural design, limited landscaping, and no internal open space. The proposed project will provide landscape buffers on the Shadowlawn and US 41 rights-of-way, the number of driveway openings are reduced, the buildings are designed to comply with the current architectural criteria, and internal landscape areas and open spaces are provided. g. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee. The property will be a unified development solely owned and maintained by RaceTrac Petroleum. h. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Site Plan with Deviations - 4 - The requested deviations are outlined below. i. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development. As noted, several enhancements are provided as part of the redevelopment including improved transportation functionality, improved stormwater management as well as improved landscaping and architecture. j. Approval of the deviation will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. The site has been designed to minimize adverse impact on adjacent properties by orienting the proposed use away from existing residential areas, improving transportation functionality, and providing improved stormwater management. Proposed Deviations: As required by 10.02.03.F.7.h. of the Collier County Land Development Code a detailed description of the proposed deviations along with a justification for each is provided below. Deviation Request 1: Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1. (Front Yard Setback) Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1. which requires a minimum front yard setback for facilities with fuel pumps of 50 feet to instead allow a reduced front yard setback of 27 feet for the east front yard (Shadowlawn Dr. frontage). Justification The proposed RaceTrac at Shadowlawn sits in the northwest corner of US 41 and Shadowlawn Dr. which intersect at a severe skew angle of nearly 45 degrees. The proposed building and canopy are oriented parallel to US 41, which creates a situation where the “front” setback on Shadowlawn is dimensioned to the back corner of the building. Approximately 30% of the side wall and 75% of the rear wall (or 60% of the overall façade that faces Shadowlawn) meet the required setback. Both the rear and side façades will meet the secondary façade architectural criteria and will be entirely behind the right-of-way buffer. There are no site improvements or impervious areas between the building and the right-of-way; the area is used entirely for open space and dry detention. The requested setback for the redevelopment exceeds the typical 25’ front setback in effect at the time the property was originally developed. Deviation Request 2: LDC Section 5.05.05.C.4.b. (Canopy Sign Area) Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.C.4.b. which limits facilities with fuel pumps to one (1) illuminated corporate logo with a maximum area of twelve (12) square feet on a canopy face which is adjacent to a dedicated street or highway, to instead allow one (1) - fifty (50) square foot corporate logo on the canopy façade facing the Tamiami Trail east right-of-way and two (2) – thirty (30) square foot corporate logos, one (1) on RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Site Plan with Deviations - 5 - the façade facing Shadowlawn Dr. and one (1) on the façade facing the existing commercial parcel to the northwest. Justification 2: The corporate logo for RaceTrac is the company name. Limiting their logo to the allowed twelve (12) square feet results in an 8.4 foot wide sign with 1.4 foot high letters. With their letter size reduced, the sign would be difficult to read on the canopy and possibly unrecognizable. The requested canopy signs are shown in the enclosed Sign Package. In addition, RaceTrac wishes to have a recognizable appearance in Collier County. This recognition is important for motorists traveling on US 41 who wish to enter the RaceTrac. The signage needs to be recognizable from a distance so drivers can safely maneuver as needed to enter the Project. US 41 in the vicinity of the project is a 6-lane divided arterial with a 45 MPH posted speed. At this speed, vehicles travel nearly 70 feet per second. Allowing the drivers to recognize the destination in time to safely maneuver to the needed turning movements is a critical element of the canopy signage. Finally, as a redevelopment project, the site when originally constructed did not have the current signage restrictions for service stations and would have been limited to a percentage of the façade. The three sides proposed for signage are all visible from the street and have a combined façade area of 1,304 SF; the total canopy signage proposed is 110 SF, or 8.4% of the façade area. Deviation Request 3: LDC Section 5.05.05.C.4.b. (Number of Canopy Signs) Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.C.4.b. which limits facilities with fuel pumps to one (1) illuminated corporate logo per canopy face which is adjacent to a dedicated street or highway to allow one (1) additional illuminated corporate logo on the northwest canopy façade facing the existing commercial parcel. Justification 3: As noted in the previous justification, adequate maneuvering time is an important function of signage. While the northwest side of the canopy does not face a street, it is highly visible from the street and a legitimate location for signage intended to be visible by the traveling public. Further, the subject project, along with other businesses fronting US 41 in the corridor, as well as the median, have lush, mature landscaping which blocks visibility from lower signage. Signage mounted on the canopy will be visible by motorists traveling southbound on US 41 and allow safe entry into the northbound Shadowlawn turn lane, which is the only opportunity to enter the site for that direction of travel on US 41. In addition, as a redevelopment project, the site when originally constructed did not have the current signage restrictions for service stations and would have been limited to a percentage of the façade. The three sides proposed for signage are all visible from the street and would have been allowed signage consistent with the base signage criteria in the LDC. RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Site Plan with Deviations - 6 - Deviation Request 4: LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.a. (Right-of-Way Buffer) Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.a. which requires landscaping adjacent to rights-of-way external to the development project shall be located within a landscape buffer easement which is a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet in width and requires that water management swales shall not be located within these buffer areas, to instead allow the dry detention area to overlap the buffer by 12.5 feet (50%) along the Shadowlawn Drive frontage. Justification 4 Given the severe intersection angle of US 41 and Shadowlawn Drive, triangular areas between the building and Shadowlawn are created that are proposed to be utilized for dry detention ponds. In an effort to maximize the amount of water quality treatment and water quantity attenuation provided, the use of half of the required buffer yard is requested. Water management facilities are allowed to be located within the buffer yard on all other uses. The plantings required by LDC 5.05.05 can be accommodated within the front half of the buffer immediately adjacent to the Shadowlawn right-of- way. It should also be noted most of the existing uses that make up the proposed project area have no water management system and directly discharge runoff to the surrounding rights-of-way or adjacent properties. The property was developed as a gas station prior to 1998. Prior to 1998, the Code in effect at the time the property was developed had no additional landscape buffer requirements for the automobile service station as evidenced in Section 2.6.28.16. Section 2.6.28.16, had no additional landscape criteria and refers to division 2.4. Section 2.4.7.4, of the LDC in effect prior to the specific gas station requirements for landscaping required a 15’ Type D Buffer and had no reference to the overlap of detention areas. Ordinance No. 98-063, amended the gas station regulations to add specific landscape buffers. The proposed buffers exceed the buffers in effect at the time the gas station was originally developed. Deviation Request 5: Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1. (Side Yard Setback) Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.B.1. which requires a minimum side yard setback for facilities with fuel pumps of 40 feet, to instead allow a reduced side yard setback of 28 feet for the northwest side yard (ABC Property). Justification The proposed RaceTrac at Shadowlawn sits in the northwest corner of US 41 and Shadowlawn Dr. which intersect at a severe skew angle of nearly 45 degrees creating a triangular shaped property. In addition, the northwest property line in not linear and ABC jogs toward the RaceTrac property, which creates a pinch point to the corner of the canopy. The setback measured directly to the side of the canopy meets the minimum setback criteria. Further, considering the 40 side setback for the proposed RaceTrac and the 25 feet side setback for the C-4 Zoning District of the ABC Property would create a minimum distance between structures of 65 feet; the proposed canopy is 70 feet from the existing structure on the ABC property at the closest point. RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Site Plan with Deviations - 7 - The requested setback for the redevelopment exceeds the 25’ side setback requirement for the base (C-4) Zoning District. Deviation Request 6: Collier County LDC Section 5.05.08.D.2.b. (Secondary Façade Facing Street) Collier County LDC Section 5.05.08.D.2.b. which requires the design of primary façades must include, at a minimum, two of the design features listed in 5.05.08.D.2.b to instead allow the side (southeast) and rear (northeast) façades which face Shadowlawn Drive be considered secondary. Justification 6: Because of the angle of Shadowlawn Drive relative to US 41, nearly 45 degrees, the side and rear façades of the building face Shadowlawn Dr. The orientation of the building is such that the main entrances are on the southwest (facing US 41) and northwest (facing the ABC property) respectively. Please reference the enclosed Site Plan. The northeast façade, which faces Shadowlawn Dr. at an angle, is the back of the building where the internal building layout has the storage and back-of-house operations located. Please reference the enclosed Building Floor Plans. Furthermore it is where the deliveries are received. The southeast façade also faces Shadowlawn Dr. at an angle. Inside this end of the building are coolers and other non-customer areas. The northeast (rear) and southeast (side) building façades are being proposed as secondary façades due to the functionality of the building and service orientated needs located interior of these façades. The side façade has been treated with 24% glazing and the rear service entry has been enhanced with a tower element and all doors have been treated with canopies to enhance the façade. Neither of these façades squarely face Shadowlawn due to the shape of the parcel. Buffer trees along Shadowlawn Drive have been increased from 14’ to 16’ to further screen the rear and side facades. Deviation Request 7: Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.a. (Right of Way Buffer) Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.b. which requires landscaping adjacent to rights-of-way external to the project to include an undulating berm with a maximum slope of 3:1 shall be constructed along the entire length of the landscape buffer and shall be constructed and maintained at a minimum average height of three (3) feet, to instead allow the elimination of the 3’ undulating berm. Justification US 41 in the vicinity of the project is an established, built out corridor. No other existing businesses in the area have a 3’ berm associated with the right-of-way buffer along US 41. Eliminating the berm will creates a more seamless uniform appearance for the redeveloped property. All plant material required by the LDC will be provided. RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Site Plan with Deviations - 8 - It should also be noted there is aerial utility lines located on the right-of-way lines. The plant material required by LDC 5.05.05 is taller than the typical commercial right-of- way buffer. Locating this taller material on a 3’ berm could create a conflict between the tree canopies and the existing utility lines that would later by cut away by the utility company. The existing site has only a single hedge row on US 41 and a portion of Shadowlawn Drive. Elimination of the berm on the Shadowlawn frontage also allows the grading of the proposed detention areas to provide water quality treatment areas for this redevelopment site. There is currently no stormwater treatment or attenuation onsite. The property was developed as a gas station prior to 1998. Prior to 1998, the Code in effect at the time the property was developed had no additional landscape buffer requirements for the automobile service station as evidenced in Section 2.6.28.16. Section 2.6.28.16, had no additional landscape criteria and refers to division 2.4. Section 2.4.7.4, of the LDC in effect prior to the specific gas station requirements for landscaping required a 15’ Type D Buffer with a 24” hedge and trees 30’ on center; a berm was not required. Ordinance No. 98-063, amended the gas station regulations to add specific landscape buffers. The proposed buffers exceed the buffers in effect at the time the gas station was originally developed. Deviation Request 8: Collier County LDC Section 4.06.02.C (Side Yard Buffer) Collier County LDC Section 4.06.02.C. (Table 2.4) which requires a 15’ wide Type ‘B’ landscape buffer along the ABC Property to instead allow a portion of the buffer adjacent to the ABC property to re-allocated to the remaining landscape buffers and/or internal landscape areas of the proposed project. Justification The proposed property boundary includes a portion of the existing ABC property currently utilized as parking. The existing ABC parking will remain and there will be access through the RaceTrac Property via internal drive aisles. An inter-parcel connection will also be created providing vehicles utilizing the ABC parking and US 41 driveway access to Shadowlawn through the RaceTrac property. While these improvements create for better traffic movement, the vehicular areas leave no area to provide the required 15’ Type ‘B’ Buffer. This request proposes to provide the required buffer area and plantings distributed throughout the proposed RaceTrac development. These plantings will be utilized to enhance the Shadowlawn Dr. right-of-way buffer and provide additional plantings on the interior of the site. The four impacted ABC Liquor buffer trees are proposed to be located within the RaceTrac property. The current code required 15’ Type ‘B’ Buffer is provided closer to US 41, west of the interconnection with the ABC property. The code requirements at the time of the RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Site Plan with Deviations - 9 - original development only required a 5’ Type A buffer. The overall landscaping provided for this buffer exceeds the original requirements. Deviation Request 9: Collier County LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a (Trees and Palms) Collier County LDC Section 4.06.05.D.2.a which requires no more than 30% of canopy trees may be substituted by palms within the interior of a vehicular use area and within each individual Type ‘D’ right-of-way landscape buffer to instead allow up to 100% of canopy trees to be substituted with of Royal palms within parking islands. Justification The use of palm trees for the parking islands is preferred due to the required VUA locations and sizes. The palms will maintain the desired landscape aesthetic, allow better sight visibility for vehicular movement in the parking, while providing shade and climatic relief for the patio seating area keeping with the intent of the LDC. In the aftermath of the hurricane it was evident that the palms did better weathering than the hard woods. Therefore, in an effort to avoid future issues, palm trees are preferred on this site. Deviation Request 10: Collier County LDC Section 4.06.03.B.1. - Landscaping Requirements for Vehicular Use Areas Collier County LDC Section 4.06.03.B.1 which requires one tree shall be provided for every 250 square feet of required interior landscaped area to instead allow one tree for every 500 square feet of required interior landscaped area. Justification The project is a redevelopment infill project with a restrictive property configuration. The post development landscape plan proposed exceeds the pre-development existing conditions. The layout of the Vehicular Use Area which is designed to provide interconnections with adjacent properties and the required on site vehicular circulation patterns in a safe arrangement does not provide sufficient locations where canopy trees will be sustainable from a horticultural function. The existing development was not required to provide Vehicular Use Area plantings. Proposed trees to be provided on site are a 258% increase over existing developed conditions. Deviation Request 11: Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.c (Right of Way Buffer Landscaping – US 41) Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.c. which dictates the required trees and palms shall be clustered in double rows with a minimum of three (3) trees per cluster. Canopy trees shall be planted a maximum of twenty (20) feet on center within a cluster. The use of palms within the right-of-way buffer shall be limited to landscaped areas adjacent to vehicular access points. Palms shall be planted in staggered heights, a minimum of three (3) palms per cluster, spaced at a maximum of eight (8) feet on center, with a minimum of a four (4) foot difference in height between each tree to instead allow a single row of royal palm trees (24’ overall height) with single 36” hedge row and additional shrubs and ground cover plantings for the US 41 buffer. RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Site Plan with Deviations - 10 - Justification This deviation is sought to alleviate and reduce future conflicts of the buffer trees growing into existing overhead power lines adjacent to this R.O.W. buffer and allow for sight distances. The palms will maintain the desired landscape aesthetic, allow better sight visibility for vehicular movement, while providing shade and climatic relief keeping with the intent of the LDC. The proposed palms have been increased in height and exceed the minimum heights required by the LDC. The palm planting is consistent with developed properties along the corridor. The current US 41 buffer consists only of a single row hedge with no trees. The proposed 25’ buffer is 10’ wider than the buffer required at the time of original development and the design will greatly enhance the aesthetics of the site and be consistent with other recent development projects in the corridor such as the Buffalo Wild Wings approximately 0.4 miles south which also utilized 100% royal palms for the right-of-way buffer. A total of 410 buffer shrubs and 200 groundcovers are being provided along the US 41 buffer. These enhance the right of way corridor and exceed the minimum required 212 shrubs required per the standard buffer. The sight visibility for the traveling motorist entering and exiting the site exceeds the typical buffer installation thereby providing for better public safety. The property was developed as a gas station prior to 1998. Prior to 1998, the Code in effect at the time the property was developed had no additional landscape buffer requirements for the automobile service station as evidenced in Section 2.6.28.16. Section 2.6.28.16, had no additional landscape criteria and refers to division 2.4. Section 2.4.7.4, of the LDC in effect prior to the specific gas station requirements for landscaping required a 15’ Type D Buffer with a 24” hedge and trees 30’ on center. Ordinance No. 98-063, amended the gas station regulations to add specific landscape buffers. The proposed buffer with enhanced trees 20’ on center and a 36” hedge exceeds the buffers in effect at the time the gas station was originally developed. Deviation Request 12: Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.d (Right of Way Buffer Landscaping – US 41) Collier County LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.d. which requires all of the trees shall be a minimum of fourteen (14) feet in height at the time of installation. Trees shall have a minimum of a three and one-half (3½) inch caliper at twelve (12) inches above the ground and a six (6) foot spread. At installation, shrubs shall be a minimum of ten (10) gallons, five (5) feet in height, with a three (3) foot spread, planted four (4) feet on center to instead allow a single row of royal palm trees (24’ overall height) with single 36” hedge row and additional shrubs and ground cover plantings for the US 41 buffer. RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Site Plan with Deviations - 11 - Justification This deviation is sought to alleviate and reduce future conflicts of the buffer trees growing into existing overhead power lines adjacent to this R.O.W. buffer and allow for sight distances. The palms will maintain the desired landscape aesthetic, allow better sight visibility for vehicular movement, while providing shade and climatic relief keeping with the intent of the LDC. The current US 41 buffer consists only of a single row hedge with no trees. The proposed 25’ buffer is 10’ wider than the buffer required at the time of original development and the design will greatly enhance the aesthetics of the site and be consistent with other recent development projects in the corridor such as the Buffalo Wild Wings approximately 0.4 miles south which also utilized 100% royal palms for the right-of-way buffer. The proposed palms have been increased in height and exceed the minimum heights required by the LDC. The palm planting is consistent with developed properties along the corridor. The property was developed as a gas station prior to 1998. Prior to 1998, the Code in effect at the time the property was developed had no additional landscape buffer requirements for the automobile service station as evidenced in Section 2.6.28.16. Section 2.6.28.16, had no additional landscape criteria and refers to division 2.4. Section 2.4.7.4, of the LDC in effect prior to the specific gas station requirements for landscaping required a 15’ Type D Buffer with a 24” hedge and trees 30’ on center. Ordinance No. 98-063, amended the gas station regulations to add specific landscape buffers. The proposed buffer with enhanced trees 20’ on center and a 36” hedge exceeds the buffers in effect at the time the gas station was originally developed. THE FOLLOWING DEVIATIONS FROM THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ARE APPROVED FOR THE PROPERTY A. From Section 5.05.05.B.1. which requires a minimum front yard setback for facilities with fuel pumps of 50 feet to instead allow a reduced front yard setback of 27 feet for the east front yard (Shadowlawn Dr. frontage). B. From Section 5.05.05.C.4.b. which limits facilities with fuel pumps to one (1) illuminated corporate logo with a maximum area of twelve (12) square feet on a canopy face which is adjacent to a dedicated street or highway, to instead allow one (1) - fifty (50) square foot corporate logo on the canopy façade facing the Tamiami Trail east right-of-way and two (2) – thirty (30) square foot corporate logos, one (1) on the façade facing Shadowlawn Dr. and one (1) on the façade facing the existing commercial parcel to the northwest. C. From Section 5.05.05.C.4.b. which limits facilities with fuel pumps to one (1) illuminated corporate logo per canopy face which is adjacent to a dedicated street or highway to allow one (1) additional illuminated corporate logo on the northwest canopy façade facing the existing commercial parcel. D. From Section 5.05.05.E.1.a. which requires landscaping adjacent to rights-of-way external to the development project shall be located within a landscape buffer easement which is a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet in width and requires that water management swales shall not be located within these buffer areas, to instead allow the dry detention area to overlap the buffer by 12.5 feet (50%) along the Shadowlawn Drive frontage. E. From Section 5.05.05.B.1. which requires a minimum side yard setback for facilities with fuel pumps of 40 feet, to instead allow a reduced side yard setback of 28 feet for the northwest side yard (ABC Property). F. From Section 5.05.08.D.2.b. which requires the design of primary façades must include, at a minimum, two of the design features listed in 5.05.08.D.2.b to instead allow the side (southeast) and rear (northeast) façades which face Shadowlawn Drive be considered secondary. G. From Section 5.05.05.E.1.b. which requires landscaping adjacent to rights-of-way external to the project to include an undulating berm with a maximum slope of 3:1 shall be constructed along the entire length of the landscape buffer and shall be constructed and maintained at a minimum average height of three (3) feet, to instead allow the elimination of the 3’ undulating berm. H. From Section 4.06.02.C. (Table 2.4) which requires a 15’ wide Type ‘B’ landscape buffer along the ABC Property to instead allow a portion of the buffer adjacent to the ABC property to re-allocated to the remaining landscape buffers and/or internal landscape areas of the proposed project. I. From Section 4.06.05.D.2.a which requires no more than 30% of canopy trees may be substituted by palms within the interior of a vehicular use area and within each individual Type ‘D’ right-of-way landscape buffer to instead allow up to 100% of canopy trees to be substituted with of Royal palms within parking islands. J. From Section 4.06.03.B.1 which requires one tree shall be provided for every 250 square feet of required interior landscaped area to instead allow one tree for every 500 square feet of required interior landscaped area. K. From Section 5.05.05.E.1.c. which dictates the required trees and palms shall be clustered in double rows with a minimum of three (3) trees per cluster. Canopy trees shall be planted a maximum of twenty (20) feet on center within a cluster. The use of palms within the right-of-way buffer shall be - 2 - limited to landscaped areas adjacent to vehicular access points. Palms shall be planted in staggered heights, a minimum of three (3) palms per cluster, spaced at a maximum of eight (8) feet on center, with a minimum of a four (4) foot difference in height between each tree to instead allow a single row of royal palm trees (24’ overall height) with single 36” hedge row and additional shrubs and ground cover plantings for the US 41 buffer. L. From Section 5.05.05.E.1.d. which requires all of the trees shall be a minimum of fourteen (14) feet in height at the time of installation. Trees shall have a minimum of a three and one-half (3½) inch caliper at twelve (12) inches above the ground and a six (6) foot spread. At installation, shrubs shall be a minimum of ten (10) gallons, five (5) feet in height, with a three (3) foot spread, planted four (4) feet on center to instead allow a single row of royal palm trees (24’ overall height) with single 36” hedge row and additional shrubs and ground cover plantings for the US 41 buffer. Township: County, State: Part of Section(s): Project Number: Sheet Number: 1605 Hendry Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 418-0691 (239) 418-0692 fax Florida Certificate of Authorization Engineering LB #26978 21442 25 E COLLIER COUNTY, FL 200 GALLERIA PARKWAY SE, SUITE 900 ATLANTA, GA 30339 (770) 431-7600 RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. SHADOWLAWN DRIVE (EPN #1266 - STORE #XXXX) 11 Range:50 S PROJECT: OWNER / DEVELOPER: SITE PLAN W/ DEVIATIONS 1 OF 3 SETBACK REQUIRED FRONT (US 41, SR 45) PROVIDED 50' SIDE (NORTH) SIDE (NORTHWEST)40' FRONT (SHADOWLAWN DRIVE)50' EAST (SHAWDOWLAWN AVE) 15' TYPE 'B'NORTH (OFFICE) NORTHWEST (RETAIL) PROPERTY LINE BUFFER REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER TABLE SITE DESIGN STANDARDS SOUTHWEST (US 41, SR 45) TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST 40' BUFFER PROVIDED 25' PER LDC 5.05.05.E.1. 15' TYPE 'B' 25' PER LDC 5.05.05.E.1. 15' TYPE 'B' 25' ENHANCED 15' TYPE 'B' 4 55.8' (CANOPY) 30.3' (STORE) / 42.7' (CANOPY) 77.3' (STORE) / 28' (CANOPY) 95.6' (STORE) / 55' (DUMPSTER) 1 ZONING C-4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOLIO # PROJECT INFORMATION 61834720003, 61834680004, 26780080007, 26780040005 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, BEING ALL OF PARCELS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3783, PAGE 2199, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1737, PAGE 463 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3784, PAGE 1811 AND A PORTION OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2095, PAGE 370 ALL OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LESS THE RIGHT OF WAY TAKINGS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2403, PAGE 2376 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2403, PAGE 2372 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2403, PAGE 2369, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36, NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 27 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, )/25,'$7+(1&(6ƒ ($/21*7+(($67/,1(2)6$,'/27)25)((77+(1&( 6ƒ :)25$',67$1&(2))((7727+(1257+($67&251(52)7+(3$5&(/2)/$1' DESCRIBED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1737, PAGE 463, THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF SHADOWLAWN DRIVE, A 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF /$1'+(5(,1'(6&5,%('7+(1&(6ƒ ($/21*6$,':(675,*+72):$<)25$',67$1&( OF 408.99 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF )((77+(1&($/21*6$,'&859(7+528*+$&(175$/$1*/(2)ƒ $&+25'%($5,1* 2)6ƒ :$&+25'/(1*7+2))((7$1'$1$5&/(1*7+2))((772$32,1721 THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (STATE ROAD NO. 90, U.S. 41), A VARIABLE :,'7+5,*+72):$<7+(1&(1ƒ :$/21*6$,'1257+5,*+72):$<)25$',67$1&(2) 390.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID OFFICIAL 5(&25'6%22.3$*(7+(1&(1ƒ ($/21*7+(:(67/,1(2)6$,'3$5&(/)25$ ',67$1&(2))((77+(1&(1ƒ ()25$',67$1&(2))((77+(1&(6ƒ ( )25$',67$1&(2))((77+(1&(1ƒ ()25$',67$1&(2))((7727+(:(67 LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1737, PAGE 463; THENCE 1ƒ :$/21*6$,':(67/,1()25$',67$1&(2))((7727+(1257+/,1(2)6$,' 3$5&(/7+(1&(1ƒ ($/21*6$,'1257+/,1()25$',67$1&(2))((7727+( POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 92,137 SQUARE FEET, OR 2.115 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 25' PER LDC 5.05.05.E.1. 7 8 11 7 5 12 ICE MACHINE PROPERTY BOUNDARY EX. STATE ROAD 45 (U.S. 41) TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (R.O.W. VARIES - PUBLIC) RACETRAC MARKET 5,411 SF RETAIL MAX HEIGHT = 75' DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE EX. SHADOWLAWN DR IVE (R .O .W . 6 0 ' PUBL IC ) PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY 25' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 3 - 20,000 GAL. UNDERGROUND FUEL TANKS MONUMENT SIGN LOCATION 60 SF, 8' HEIGHT55.8'2 4 1 . 4 ' 362.7' 42.7' 28' 1 2 5 . 1 ' DRY DETENTION AREA DRY DETENTION AREA DRY DETENTION AREA LOADING AREA 15' TYPE 'B' BUFFER NAPLES OUTFITTERS RETAIL ZONING: C-4 OVERLAY: BMUD OVERLAY: GTMUD 15' T Y P E ' B' BUF F E R ABC LIQUOR / RETAIL ZONING : C-4 OVERLAY: BMUD OVERLAY: GTMUD 2 5 ' BUFFERPER LDC 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 MILLER SQUARE ZONING : PUD OVERLAY: BMUD ZONING : RMF-6 OVERLAY: BMUD OVERLAY: GTMUD 30.3' 1 2 2 1 INTERCONNECT TO EXISTING ABC PROPERTY 6 6 2 3 8 4 7 4 1 2 . 5 '12 . 5 ' 8 DI S T A N C E T O N E A R E S T FA C I L I T Y W I T H F U E L 3 8 0 3 6      “ 77.3' 7 7 9 9 9 9 28'5 DRY DETENTION AREA 5 7 . 4 ' 77.7' 9 7 '147.1'57.5' RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT DRIVEWAY 10' Township: County, State: Part of Section(s): Project Number: Sheet Number: 1605 Hendry Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 418-0691 (239) 418-0692 fax Florida Certificate of Authorization Engineering LB #26978 21442 25 E COLLIER COUNTY, FL 200 GALLERIA PARKWAY SE, SUITE 900 ATLANTA, GA 30339 (770) 431-7600 RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. SHADOWLAWN DRIVE (EPN #1266 - STORE #XXXX) 11 Range:50 S PROJECT: OWNER / DEVELOPER: SITE PLAN W/ DEVIATIONS 2 OF 3 400 20 80 Township: County, State: Part of Section(s): Project Number: Sheet Number: 1605 Hendry Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 (239) 418-0691 (239) 418-0692 fax Florida Certificate of Authorization Engineering LB #26978 21442 25 E COLLIER COUNTY, FL 200 GALLERIA PARKWAY SE, SUITE 900 ATLANTA, GA 30339 (770) 431-7600 RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. SHADOWLAWN DRIVE (EPN #1266 - STORE #XXXX) 11 Range:50 S PROJECT: OWNER / DEVELOPER: SITE PLAN W/ DEVIATIONS 3 OF 3 DEVIATIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1. WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS OF 50 FEET TO INSTEAD ALLOW A REDUCED FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 30 FEET FOR THE EAST FRONT YARD (SHADOWLAWN DR. FRONTAGE). COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.C.4.b. WHICH LIMITS FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS TO ONE (1) ILLUMINATED CORPORATE LOGO WITH A MAXIMUM AREA OF TWELVE (12) SQUARE FEET ON A CANOPY FACE WHICH IS ADJACENT TO A DEDICATED STREET OR HIGHWAY, TO INSTEAD ALLOW ONE (1) - FIFTY (50) SQUARE FOOT CORPORATE LOGO ON THE CANOPY FACADE FACING THE TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TWO (2) - THIRTY (30) SQUARE FOOT CORPORATE LOGOS, ONE (1) ON THE FACADE FACING SHADOWLAWN DR. AND ONE (1) ON THE FACADE FACING THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL PARCEL TO THE NORTHWEST. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.C.4.b. WHICH LIMITS FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS TO ONE (1) ILLUMINATED CORPORATE LOGO PER CANOPY FACE WHICH IS ADJACENT TO A DEDICATED STREET OR HIGHWAY TO ALLOW ONE (1) ADDITIONAL ILLUMINATED CORPORATE LOGO ON THE NORTHWEST CANOPY FACADE FACING THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL PARCEL. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.a. WHICH REQUIRES LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO RIGHTS-OF-WAY EXTERNAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN A LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT WHICH IS A MINIMUM OF TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET IN WIDTH AND REQUIRES THAT WATER MANAGEMENT SWALES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THESE BUFFER AREAS TO INSTEAD ALLOW THE DRY DETENTION AREA TO OVERLAP THE BUFFER BY 12.5 FEET (50%). COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1. WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS OF 40 FEET TO INSTEAD ALLOW A REDUCED SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 28 FEET FOR THE NORTHWEST SIDE YARD (ABC PROPERTY). COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.08.D.2.b. WHICH REQUIRES THE DESIGN OF PRIMARY FACADES MUST INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, TWO OF THE DESIGN FEATURES LISTED IN 5.05.08.D.2.b TO INSTEAD ALLOW THE SIDE (SOUTHEAST) AND REAR (NORTHEAST) FACADES WHICH FACE SHADOWLAWN DRIVE BE CONSIDERED SECONDARY. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.b. WHICH REQUIRES LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO RIGHTS-OF-WAY EXTERNAL TO THE PROJECT TO INCLUDE AN UNDULATING BERM WITH A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 3:1 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED AT A MINIMUM AVERAGE HEIGHT OF THREE (3) FEET.TO INSTEAD ALLOW THE ELIMINATION OF THE 3' UNDULATING BERM. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 4.06.02.C. (TABLE 2.4) WHICH REQUIRES A 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE ABC PROPERTY TO INSTEAD ALLOW A PORTION OF THE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE ABC PROPERTY TO RE-ALLOCATED TO THE REMAINING LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AND/OR INTERNAL LANDSCAPE AREAS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 4.06.05.D.2.a WHICH REQUIRES NO MORE THAN 30% OF CANOPY TREES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED BY PALMS WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF A VEHICULAR USE AREA AND WITHIN EACH INDIVIDUAL TYPE 'D' RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO INSTEAD ALLOW UP TO 100% USE OF ROYAL PALMS WITHIN PARKING ISLANDS. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 4.06.03.B.1 WHICH REQUIRES ONE TREE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY 250 SQUARE FEET OF REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREA TO INSTEAD ALLOW ONE TREE FOR EVERY 500 SQUARE FEET OF REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREA. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.c. WHICH DICTATES THE REQUIRED TREES AND PALMS SHALL BE CLUSTERED IN DOUBLE ROWS WITH A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) TREES PER CLUSTER. CANOPY TREES SHALL BE PLANTED A MAXIMUM OF TWENTY (20) FEET ON CENTER WITHIN A CLUSTER. THE USE OF PALMS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BUFFER SHALL BE LIMITED TO LANDSCAPED AREAS ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS. PALMS SHALL BE PLANTED IN STAGGERED HEIGHTS, A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) PALMS PER CLUSTER, SPACED AT A MAXIMUM OF EIGHT (8) FEET ON CENTER, WITH A MINIMUM OF A FOUR (4) FOOT DIFFERENCE IN HEIGHT BETWEEN EACH TREE TO INSTEAD ALLOW A SINGLE ROW OF ROYAL PALM TREES (24' 29(5$//+(,*+7 :,7+6,1*/(´+('*(52:$1'$'',7,21$/6+58%6$1'*5281'&29(53/$17,1*6)257+(86 BUFFER. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.d. WHICH REQUIRES ALL OF THE TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FOURTEEN (14) )((7,1+(,*+7$77+(7,0(2),167$//$7,2175((66+$//+$9($0,1,0802)$7+5(($1'21(+$/) ò ,1&+&$/,3(5 AT TWELVE (12) INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND AND A SIX (6) FOOT SPREAD. AT INSTALLATION, SHRUBS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TEN (10) GALLONS, FIVE (5) FEET IN HEIGHT, WITH A THREE (3) FOOT SPREAD, PLANTED FOUR (4) FEET ON CENTER TO INSTEAD $//2:$6,1*/(52:2)52<$/3$/075((6  29(5$//+(,*+7 :,7+6,1*/(´+('*(52:$1'$'',7,21$/6+58%6 AND GROUND COVER PLANTINGS FOR THE US 41 BUFFER. 7 8 9 ICE MACHINE PROPERTY BOUNDARY EX. STATE ROAD 45 (U.S. 41) TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (R.O.W. VARIES - PUBLIC) RACETRAC MARKET 5,411 SF RETAIL MAX HEIGHT = 75' DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE EX. SHADOWLAWN DR IVE (R .O .W . 6 0 ' PUBL IC ) PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY25'LANDSCAPEBUFFER25'7 10 3 - 20,000 GAL. UNDERGROUND FUEL TANKS MONUMENT SIGN LOCATION 60 SF, 8' HEIGHT 10'5 55.8'2 4 1 . 4 ' 362.7' 7 42.7' 28' 1 2 5 . 1 ' DRY DETENTION AREA DRY DETENTION AREA DRY DETENTION AREA 4 LOADING AREA 15' TYPE 'B' BUFFER NAPLES OUTFITTERS RETAIL ZONING: C-4 OVERLAY: BMUD OVERLAY: GTMUD 15' T Y P E ' B' B U F F E R ABC LIQUOR / RETAIL ZONING : C-4 OVERLAY: BMUD OVERLAY: GTMUD 2 5 ' BUFFERPER LDC 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 MILLER SQUARE ZONING : PUD OVERLAY: BMUD ZONING : RMF-6 OVERLAY: BMUD OVERLAY: GTMUD 30.3' 1 2 2 1 INTERCONNECT TO EXISTING ABC PROPERTY 6 6 2 3 8 4 7 4 12.5' 12.5' 8 DI S T A N C E T O N E A R E S T F A C I L I T Y WI T H F U E L P U M P S : 3 1 5 ' + / - 77.3' 7 4 7 7 9 9 9 9 28' 5 DRY DETENTION AREA 5 7 . 4 ' 77.7' 9 7 '147.1'57.5' RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT DRIVEWAY PLAN REVISIONSDATEDESCRIPTIONTownship: County, State: Part of Section(s): Project Number: Status: Sheet Number: Drawn By: Checked By: Project Manager: FOR SUBMITTAL PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT VALID WITHOUT SEAL, SIGNATURE AND DATEJTW CAS JTW 21442 25 E COLLIER COUNTY, FL 11 Range:50 SPROJECT:OWNER / DEVELOPER:2/5/2018 10:21 AMK:\21442 - RACETRAC @ SHADOWLAWN DR\EXHIBITS\DEVIATION PLAN\21442-01-DEVIATIONS-24X36.DWG#200 GALLERIA PARKWAY SE, SUITE 900ATLANTA, GA 30339(770) 431-7600RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC.SHADOWLAWN DRIVE(EPN #1266 - STORE #XXXX)1605 Hendry StreetFort Myers, FL 33901(239) 418-0691(239) 418-0692 faxFlorida Certificateof AuthorizationEngineering LB #26978N EW S30015 60 SETBACK REQUIRED FRONT (US 41, SR 45) PROVIDED 50' SIDE (NORTH) SIDE (NORTHWEST)40' FRONT (SHADOWLAWN DRIVE)50' CATEGORY BUILDING PAVEMENT / SIDEWALK TOTAL PERVIOUS EAST (SHAWDOWLAWN AVE) 15' TYPE 'B'NORTH (OFFICE) NORTHWEST (RETAIL) PROPERTY LINE BUFFER REQUIRED LAND USE SUMMARY LEGEND PARKING COUNT (RACETRAC)8 LANDSCAPE BUFFER TABLE SITE DESIGN STANDARDS SOUTHWEST (US 41, SR 45) TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST 40' 28 30 (2) CONVENIENCE STORE 5,411 SF @ 1 SPACE PER 200 SF USE RATIO REQUIRED PROVIDED TOTAL 28 PARKING SUMMARY 1. "(#)" REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF HANDICAP SPACES INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL SPACES. 2. EX. 4 SPACES ON ABC PROPERTY EXCLUDED FROM RACETRAC PARKING COUNT. NOTES: 30 (2) SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS DEVIATIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 PARKING COUNT (ABC) BUFFER PROVIDED 25' PER LDC 5.05.05.E.1. 15' TYPE 'B' 25' PER LDC 5.05.05.E.1. 15' TYPE 'B' 25' ENHANCED 15' TYPE 'B' 4 55.8' (CANOPY) 30.3' (STORE) / 42.7' (CANOPY) 77.3' (STORE) / 28' (CANOPY) 95.6' (STORE) / 55' (DUMPSTER) 1 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PARAMETERS BUILDINGS TOTAL UNITS SITE ACREAGE NUMBER OF STORIES 1 1 1 2.12 AC. GROSS FLOOR AREA 1 (21 FT) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V-B OCCUPANCY USE MERCANTILE (M) FIRE SPRINKLERS YES REQUIRED FIRE FLOW 2,000 GPM AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW T.B.D. GPM 5,411 SF UNITS PER BUILDING NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCTION TYPE PROVIDED BY ARCHITECT. 2. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW DETERMINED FROM 2010 NFPA 1, TABLE 18.4.5.1.2. 3. AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW FROM FIRE FLOW TEST DATED XX/XX/XX. 1 ZONING C-4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOLIO # PROJECT INFORMATION 61834720003, 61834680004, 26780080007, 26780040005 AREA 0.13 AC. PERCENTAGE 6% 100.0% 1.34 AC.63% 0.65 AC.31% 2.12 AC. A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, BEING ALL OF PARCELS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3783, PAGE 2199, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1737, PAGE 463 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3784, PAGE 1811 AND A PORTION OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2095, PAGE 370 ALL OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LESS THE RIGHT OF WAY TAKINGS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2403, PAGE 2376 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2403, PAGE 2372 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2403, PAGE 2369, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36, NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 27 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; 7+(1&(6ƒ ($/21*7+(($67/,1(2)6$,'/27)25 )((77+(1&(6ƒ :)25$',67$1&(2))((772 THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1737, PAGE 463, THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF SHADOWLAWN DRIVE, A 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE 6ƒ ($/21*6$,':(675,*+72):$<)25$',67$1&(2) 408.99 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.50 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE 7+528*+$&(175$/$1*/(2)ƒ $&+25'%($5,1*2) 6ƒ :$&+25'/(1*7+2))((7$1'$1$5&/(1*7+2) 45.15 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (STATE ROAD NO. 90, U.S. 41), A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT OF :$<7+(1&(1ƒ :$/21*6$,'1257+5,*+72):$<)25$ DISTANCE OF 390.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3783, PAGE 2199; 7+(1&(1ƒ ($/21*7+(:(67/,1(2)6$,'3$5&(/)25$ ',67$1&(2))((77+(1&(1ƒ ()25$',67$1&(2) )((77+(1&(6ƒ ()25$',67$1&(2))((7 7+(1&(1ƒ ()25$',67$1&(2))((7727+(:(67 LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS %22.3$*(7+(1&(1ƒ :$/21*6$,':(67/,1( FOR A DISTANCE OF 69.48 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; 7+(1&(1ƒ ($/21*6$,'1257+/,1()25$',67$1&(2) 196.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 92,137 SQUARE FEET, OR 2.115 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1. WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS OF 50 FEET TO INSTEAD ALLOW A REDUCED FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 30 FEET FOR THE EAST FRONT YARD (SHADOWLAWN DR. FRONTAGE). COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.C.4.b. WHICH LIMITS FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS TO ONE (1) ILLUMINATED CORPORATE LOGO WITH A MAXIMUM AREA OF TWELVE (12) SQUARE FEET ON A CANOPY FACE WHICH IS ADJACENT TO A DEDICATED STREET OR HIGHWAY, TO INSTEAD ALLOW ONE (1) - FIFTY (50) SQUARE FOOT CORPORATE LOGO ON THE CANOPY FACADE FACING THE TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TWO (2) - THIRTY (30) SQUARE FOOT CORPORATE LOGOS, ONE (1) ON THE FACADE FACING SHADOWLAWN DR. AND ONE (1) ON THE FACADE FACING THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL PARCEL TO THE NORTHWEST. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.C.4.b. WHICH LIMITS FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS TO ONE (1) ILLUMINATED CORPORATE LOGO PER CANOPY FACE WHICH IS ADJACENT TO A DEDICATED STREET OR HIGHWAY TO ALLOW ONE (1) ADDITIONAL ILLUMINATED CORPORATE LOGO ON THE NORTHWEST CANOPY FACADE FACING THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL PARCEL. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.a. WHICH REQUIRES LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO RIGHTS-OF-WAY EXTERNAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN A LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT WHICH IS A MINIMUM OF TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET IN WIDTH AND REQUIRES THAT WATER MANAGEMENT SWALES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THESE BUFFER AREAS TO INSTEAD ALLOW THE DRY DETENTION AREA TO OVERLAP THE BUFFER BY 12.5 FEET (50%). COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1. WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS OF 40 FEET TO INSTEAD ALLOW A REDUCED SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 28 FEET FOR THE NORTHWEST SIDE YARD (ABC PROPERTY). COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.08.D.2.b. WHICH REQUIRES THE DESIGN OF PRIMARY FACADES MUST INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, TWO OF THE DESIGN FEATURES LISTED IN 5.05.08.D.2.b TO INSTEAD ALLOW THE SIDE (SOUTHEAST) AND REAR (NORTHEAST) FACADES WHICH FACE SHADOWLAWN DRIVE BE CONSIDERED SECONDARY. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.b. WHICH REQUIRES LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO RIGHTS-OF-WAY EXTERNAL TO THE PROJECT TO INCLUDE AN UNDULATING BERM WITH A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 3:1 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED AT A MINIMUM AVERAGE HEIGHT OF THREE (3) FEET.TO INSTEAD ALLOW THE ELIMINATION OF THE 3' UNDULATING BERM. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 4.06.02.C. (TABLE 2.4) WHICH REQUIRES A 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE ABC PROPERTY TO INSTEAD ALLOW A PORTION OF THE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE ABC PROPERTY TO RE-ALLOCATED TO THE REMAINING LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AND/OR INTERNAL LANDSCAPE AREAS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 4.06.05.D.2.a WHICH REQUIRES NO MORE THAN 30% OF CANOPY TREES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED BY PALMS WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF A VEHICULAR USE AREA AND WITHIN EACH INDIVIDUAL TYPE 'D' RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO INSTEAD ALLOW UP TO 100% USE OF ROYAL PALMS WITHIN PARKING ISLANDS. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 4.06.03.B.1 WHICH REQUIRES ONE TREE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY 250 SQUARE FEET OF REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREA TO INSTEAD ALLOW ONE TREE FOR EVERY 500 SQUARE FEET OF REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREA. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.c. WHICH DICTATES THE REQUIRED TREES AND PALMS SHALL BE CLUSTERED IN DOUBLE ROWS WITH A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) TREES PER CLUSTER. CANOPY TREES SHALL BE PLANTED A MAXIMUM OF TWENTY (20) FEET ON CENTER WITHIN A CLUSTER. THE USE OF PALMS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BUFFER SHALL BE LIMITED TO LANDSCAPED AREAS ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS. PALMS SHALL BE PLANTED IN STAGGERED HEIGHTS, A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) PALMS PER CLUSTER, SPACED AT A MAXIMUM OF EIGHT (8) FEET ON CENTER, WITH A MINIMUM OF A FOUR (4) FOOT DIFFERENCE IN HEIGHT BETWEEN EACH TREE TO INSTEAD ALLOW A SINGLE ROW OF 52<$/3$/075((6  29(5$//+(,*+7 :,7+6,1*/(´+('*(52:$1'$'',7,21$/6+58%6$1'*5281'&29(53/$17,1*6)257+(86 41 BUFFER. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.d. WHICH REQUIRES ALL OF THE TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FOURTEEN (14) FEET IN HEIGHT AT 7+(7,0(2),167$//$7,2175((66+$//+$9($0,1,0802)$7+5(($1'21(+$/) ò ,1&+&$/,3(5$77:(/9(  ,1&+(6$%29(7+( GROUND AND A SIX (6) FOOT SPREAD. AT INSTALLATION, SHRUBS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TEN (10) GALLONS, FIVE (5) FEET IN HEIGHT, WITH A THREE (3) FOOT SPREAD, PLANTED FOUR (4) FEET ON CENTER TO INSTEAD ALLOW A SINGLE ROW OF ROYAL PALM TREES (24' OVERALL HEIGHT) :,7+6,1*/(´+('*(52:$1'$'',7,21$/6+58%6$1'*5281'&29(53/$17,1*6)257+(86%8))(5 7 8 25' PER LDC 5.05.05.E.1. 7 8 11 9 7 5 12 EXISTING ABC LIQUOR STORE U T U U U U IRR M U S S S S S IC E M A C H I N E WEST BUFFER #2: 15' TYPE 'B'95 LF (2,100 S.F.) WITH SINGLEHEDGE ROW, 5' SHRUBS ANDTREES @ 25' O.C. (PER4.06.02.C., TABLE 2.4)[DEVIATION #8]OFF-SITE REPLACEMENTTREESNORTH BUFFER: 15' TYPE 'B' 197 LF WITH SINGLE HEDGE ROW, 5' SHRUBS AND TREES @ 25' O.C. (PER 4.06.02.C., TABLE 2.4) U . S . 4 1 / T A M I A M I T R A I L SHADOWLAWN DRIVEWEST BUFFER #1: 15' TYPE 'B'93 LF WITH SINGLE HEDGEROW, 5' SHRUBS AND TREES @ 25' O.C. (PER 4.06.02.C.,TABLE 2.4)EAST BUFFER: (PER 5.05.05 E.1.)25' WIDTH (396'-70' D/W = 326 LF);CLUSTERED TREES SPACED MAX. 20' ANDDBL. HEDGE ROW 5' HT.[DEVIATION #4 AND DEVIATION #7]S O U T H B U F F E R : ( P E R 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 E . 1 . ) 2 5 ' W I D T H ( 3 3 1 ' - 4 1 ' D /W = 2 9 0 L F ) ; C L U S T E R E D T R E E S S P A C E D M A X . 2 0 ' A N D D B L . H E D G E R OW 5 ' H T . [ D E V I A T I O N # 7 A N D D E V I A T I O N # 9 ] SIGN VI E W CORRID O R SIGN V IEWCORRIDOR SIGN VISIBILITY TRIANGLE PER 4.06.02.C-2 EXISTING ABC LIQUOR STORE NAPLES OUTFITTERS R A C E T R A C M A R K E T (5 , 4 1 1 S . F . ) MATCHLINE 'A' 25' SITE TRIANGLE F U E L C A N O P Y F U E L C A N O P Y E x i s t i n g O v e r h e a d E l e c t r i c L i n e 14" NORFOLK IS. PINE (TO BE REMOVED) 10" SABAL PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 10" SABAL PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 20" CARROTWOOD (TO BE REMOVED) 8" EUCALYPTUS (TO BE REMOVED) 12" CARROTWOOD (TO BE REMOVED) 12" OAK (TO BE REMOVED) 14" MAHOGANY (TO BE REMOVED) 18" OAK (TO BE REMOVED) 20" SABAL PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 20" SABAL PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 4 - 14" SABAL PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 12" OAK (TO BE REMOVED) 20" OAK (TO BE REMOVED) 12" CARROTWOOD (TO BE REMOVED)20" SABAL PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 10" QUEEN PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 6" HOLLY (TO BE REMOVED) 6" HOLLY (TO BE REMOVED) 4" HOLLY (TO BE REMOVED) EX. COCOPLUM HEDGE (TO BE REMOVED) EX. COCOPLUM HEDGE (TO BE REMOVED) EX. COCOPLUM HEDGE (TO BE REMOVED) 20" OAK (TO BE REMOVED) EX. COCOPLUM HEDGE (TO BE REMOVED) 14" CARROTWOOD (TO BE REMOVED) 8" EUCALYPTUS (TO BE REMOVED) FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 45 MPH FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 30 MPH FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 30 MPH E x i s t i n g O v e r h e a d E l e c t r i c L i n e 3117 sf. V UA 171 sf. V UA 133 sf. V UA 125 sf. V UA 761 sf. W. Buffer #2 1230 sf. V UA 100 sf. V UA 1322 sf. V UA 190 sf. Bld Plt 119 sf. Bld Plt 170 sf. Bld Plt 410 sf. Bld Plt SIGN 664 sf. of relocated W. Buffer #2 SCALE 1" = 30' 90'0' 15' 30' 60' GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. THE QUALITY OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL WILL MEET THE STANDARDS FOR FLORIDA GRADE NO.1 (or better), AS GOVERNED IN "GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS". 2. ALL PLANTED TREES AND PALMS WILL HAVE A 3" DEEP SAUCER CONSTRUCTED FROM THE TRUNK OF THE TREE OR PALM. MINIMUM OF 4' DIAMETER. 3. ALL PLANTING BEDS AND TREES SHALL BE COVERED WITH A 2" MINIMUM DEPTH OF MULCH AND SHALL BE WEED FREE. MULCH SHALL BE GRADE B OR BETTER. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANY VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND APPLY A PRE-EMERGENT WEED KILLER PER SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO MULCHING. NO MORE THAN 25% OF MULCH WILL BE CYPRESS, PER COLLIER COUNTY L.D.C. 4. NO CODE REQUIRED PLANTINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN EASEMENTS. 5. ANY AND ALL EXOTIC VEGETATION INCLUDING: EARLEAF ACACIA, WOMAN'S TONGUE, BISHOPWOOD, AUSTRAILIAN PINE, CARROTWOOD, ROSEWOOD, AIR POTATO, MURRAY RED GUM, WEEPING FIG, CUBAN LAUREL FIG, JAPANESE CLIMBING FERN, OLD WORD CLIMBING FERN, MELALEUCA, DOWNY ROSE MYRTLE, CHINESE TALLOW, BRAZILLIAN PEPPER, FLORIDA HOLLY, TROPICAL SODA APPLE, JAVA PLUM, ROSE APPLE, CORK TREE AND WEDELIA, ON THE PROPERTY SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF OFF SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR. THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF INVASIVE EXOTIC VEGETATION IN PERPETUITY. 6. TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 10' IN HEIGHT WITH A 2" CALIPER MEASURED AT 1' ABOVE GROUND LEVEL WITH A FOUR FOOT CANOPY UNLESS SPECIFIED AS 14' TALL TREES PER PLAN AND PLANT LIST. 7. REFER TO ENGINEERING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATIONS. 8. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FAMILIARIZING THEMSELVES WITH THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES AND ALL SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE START OF LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION. 9. FERTILIZER SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS AND COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCES. 10. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO FINE GRADE ALL PLANTING AND SODDING AREAS PRIOR TO PLANT OR SOD INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN OWNER APPROVAL OF FINAL GRADES. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE TAKEOFFS. PLANT LIST IS PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS . 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TAGS, TAPE AND SUPPORTS (EXCEPT STAKING GUYS) FROM ALL PLANTINGS PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 14. ALL AREAS OF THE SITE NOT PLANTED SHALL BE SODDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS. 15. THE REQUIRED PLANTINGS SHALL BE IRRIGATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC REQUIREMENTS. 16. THE PARKING LOTS SHALL BE SLEEVED FOR IRRIGATION BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE WITH CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS. 17. ALL BASE ROCK SHALL BE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE PARKING ISLANDS. 18. THE HEIGHT OF ALL TREES SHALL BE MEASURED FROM FINISHED GRADE AT LOCATION OF PLANTINGS. SHRUBS INTENDED FOR BUFFERING SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE HEIGHT OF THE ADJACENT PARKING GRADE IF PARKING IS ADJACENT TO THE BUFFER. 19. Plant Material Standards. 1.Quality. Plant materials used to meet the requirements of this section shall meet the standards for Florida No. 1 or better, as set out in Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants, part I and part II, Department of Agricultural, State of Florida (as amended). Root ball sizes on all transplanted plant materials shall also meet state standards. a. For sites South and West of US-41 all required landscaping shall be 100% native species as determined by accepted valid scientific reference. For sites South and West of I-75 and North and East of US-41, a minimum of 75% native trees and 50% Native shrubs are required. For sites North and East of I-75, a minimum of 75% native trees and 35% native shrubs are required. (Link to "Recommended Collier County Native Plant list" and "Native Required Planting Map"). In addition, for all sites, at least 75 percent of the trees and shrubs used to fulfill these requirements shall be drought-tolerant species as listed in the Xeriscape Plant Guide and Native Trees and Trees for South Florida (IFAS). c. Where xeric plants are to be utilized, use the South Florida Water Management District, Xeriscape Plant Guide (as amended) as a reference. SITE LANDSCAPE DATA ZONING: C4 / GTMUD OVERLAY LAND USE: COMMERCIAL TOTAL SITE: 2.12 AC (92,347 SF) GENERAL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 1 TREE PER 3000 SF OF PERVIOUS SITE AREA. 31,546 SF OF PERVIOUS AREA/3,000 = 11 TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED THROUGH BUFFER, V.U.A. AND BUILDING FOUNDATION TREE PLANTINGS. VEHICLE USE AREA 10% OF VEHICULAR USE AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED IN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA. ONE TREE PER 250 S.F. OF LANDSCAPE AREA WITH SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTINGS. 46,653 SF X 10% = 4,665 SF REQUIRED AND 4,870 S.F. PROVIDED. 4,665/ 500 SF (per deviation)=10 (10) TREES REQUIRED AND 10 TREES PROVIDED. BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPING BUILDINGS UNDER 10,000 SF. TOTAL OF ALL FACADES x .25 x 10' =TOTAL SF OF FOUNDATION PLANTINGS REQUIRED. 53'+100'+53'+100' x .25 x 10' = 765 SF REQUIRED 889 SF. PROVIDED. Building footprint under 10,000 square feet(Length) 25 percent of the combined WRWDORIDOOEXLOGLQJIDoDGHOHQJWKî :LGWK IHHWZLGH  $UHD 7RWDO3ODQWLQJ Area Required. Trees and palms shall be a minimum 10 feet high at planting. Minimum width of planting beds shall be 5 feet. Trees and palms shall be provided at a rate of 1 per 300 square feet of required foundation planting area. 765 SF / 300 = 2.55 TREES REQUIRED AND 3 PROVIDED. BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: NORTH BUFFER COMMERCIAL (C-4) TO COMMERCIAL (C-4) 15' TYPE 'B' BUFFER REQUIRED TREES REQUIRED AT 25' O.C. MAX. AND MIN. 10 GALLON SHRUBS AT 5' HT., 3' SPRD., 4' O.C. MAX. 197 L.F. / 25' = 8 TREES REQUIRED AND 8 PROVIDED. 197 L.F. / 4 = 50 SHRUBS REQUIRED AND 50 PROVIDED. SOUTH BUFFER COMMERCIAL TO U.S. 41 RIGHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.) 25' BUFFER REQUIRED PER SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.c (DEVIATION #7 AND DEVIATION #9) CANOPY TREE(S) REQUIRED; CLUSTERED IN DOUBLE ROWS, MAX. SPACING AT 20' ON CENTER WITH SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS PROVIDED ALONG ENTIRE LENGTH. SHRUB ROW TO BE MAINTAINED @ 3.5' HT. EAST BUFFER COMMERCIAL TO SHADOWLAWN RIGHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.) COMMERCIAL TO U.S. 41 RIGHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.) 25' BUFFER REQUIRED PER SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.c (DEVIATION #4 AND DEVIATION #7) CANOPY TREE(S) REQUIRED; CLUSTERED IN DOUBLE ROWS, MAX. SPACING AT 20' ON CENTER WITH SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS PROVIDED ALONG ENTIRE LENGTH. WEST BUFFER #1 COMMERCIAL (C-4) TO COMMERCIAL (C-4) 15' TYPE 'B' BUFFER REQUIRED TREES REQUIRED AT 25' O.C. MAX. AND MIN. 10 GALLON SHRUBS AT 5' HT., 3' SPRD., 4' O.C. MAX. 93 L.F. / 25' = 4 TREES REQUIRED AND 4 PROVIDED. 93 L.F. / 4 = 24 SHRUBS REQUIRED AND 25 PROVIDED. WEST BUFFER #2 COMMERCIAL (C-4) TO COMMERCIAL (C-4) 15' TYPE 'B' BUFFER REQUIRED TREES REQUIRED AT 25' O.C. MAX. AND MIN. 10 GALLON SHRUBS AT 5' HT., 3' SPRD., 4' O.C. MAX. (DEVIATION #8) 95 L.F. / 25' = 4 TREES REQUIRED AND 4 PROVIDED, (OFF-SITE REPLACEMENT). 95 L.F. / 4 = 24 SHRUBS REQUIRED AND 30 PROVIDED, (ON-SITE REPLACEMENT). NOTE: DUE TO GRADING REQUIREMENTS AND SITE INPROVEMENTS ALL EXISTING TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED P:\Drawings\2017 Jobs\RaceTrac Shadow Lawn\Drawings\RT_Shadowlawn-Version 3_LS.dwg, 2/1/2018 4:28:12 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EXISTING ABC LIQUOR STORE U U U U IRR M U S S S S S IC E M A C H I N E 200 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA PER L.D.C. 5.05.05.(C)(4)(C) U . S . 4 1 / T A M I A M I T R A I L SHADOWLAWN DRIVE12.5' FROM LIGHTS (TYP) 1 ROYAL PALM (E.B., 24' OA.) 5 PIGEON PLUM (PARKING) 10' HT. 3 ROYAL PALM (1-W.B.#1; 2-S.B., 24' O.A.) SIGN VI E W CORRID O R SIGN V IEWCORRIDOR SIGN VISIBILITY TRIANGLE PER 4.06.02.C-2 2 BALD CYPRESS (BD, 10' HT.) 8 'HIGHRISE' LIVE OAK (E.B., 16' HT.) 4 RED MAPLE (E.B., 16' HT.) 4 RED MAPLE (E.B., 16' HT.) R A C E T R A C M A R K E T (5 , 4 1 1 S . F . ) 25 SIMPSON STOPPER (5' Ht., 4' O.C. - W.B.#1) 10 TRINETTE (BD) 17 TRINETTE (BD) 20 SIMPSON STOPPER (5' Ht., 4'O.C. - E.B.) 16 COCOPLUM (E.B.) 23 SIMPSON STOPPER (5' Ht., 4'O.C. - E.B.) 19 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 13 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 11 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 11 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 17 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 11 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 25 SOCIETY GARLIC (ABOVE CODE) 46 SPARTINA (ABOVE CODE) 62 SPARTINA (E.B.) 6 SABAL PALM 1 ROYAL PALM (PARKING, 10' CT.) 1 ROYAL PALM (PARKING, 10' CT.) 18 WALTER'S VIBURNUM (5' Ht., 4'O.C. - E.B.) 3 WALTER'S VIBURNUM (5' Ht., 4' O.C. - S.B.) 30 Dwf. FAKA. GRASS (E.B.) 20 Dwf. FAKA. GRASS (E.B.) 16 COCOPLUM (E.B.) 24 JAMACIA CAPER (S.B.) 1 ROYAL PALM (E.B., 24' OA.) 14 ROYAL PALM (S.B., 24' O.A.) MATCHLINE 'A' 25' SITE TRIANGLE 15 WALTER'S VIBURNUM W.B. #2; REPLACEMENT (5' Ht., 4' O.C.) 15 WALTER'S VIBURNUM W.B. #2: REPLACEMENT (5' Ht., 4' O.C.) 4 GREEN BUTTONWOOD OFF-SITE REPLACEMENT TREES (W.B., 14' HT.) 4 COONTIE (S.B.) 4 COONTIE (S.B.) 4 COONTIE (S.B.) 4 COONTIE (S.B.) 4 COONTIE (S.B.) 25 Dwf. IXORA (S.B.) 42 Dwf. BOUG. (S.B.) 25 Dwf. BOUG. (S.B.) 25 Dwf. BOUG. (S.B.) 25 Dwf. IXORA (S.B.) 25 Dwf. IXORA (S.B.) 30 Dwf. BOUG. (S.B.) 23 SOCIETY GARLIC (ABOVE CODE) 20 FLAX LILY (S.B.) 32 SOCIETY GARLIC (ABOVE CODE)FLORITAM SODSODSODSODFLORITAM SOD BAHIA SOD BOTTOM OF DETENTION SOD SODSOD S O D S O D BEDLINE BEDLINE BEDLINE 27 Dwf. BOUG. (PARKING) 37 Dwf. BOUG. (PARKING) 20 Dwf. BOUG. (S.B.) 27 Dwf. BOUG. (S.B.) F U E L C A N O P Y F U E L C A N O P Y E x i s t i n g O v e r h e a d E l e c t r i c L i n e 1 ROYAL PALM (BD, 10' CT.) FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 45 MPH FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 30 MPH FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 30 MPH E x i s t i n g O v e r h e a d E l e c t r i c L i n e BAHIA SOD BOTTOM OF DETENTION FLORITAM SOD SIGN 1 ROYAL PALM (PARKING, 24' 0.A.) 1 ROYAL PALM (PARKING, 10' CT.) 1 ROYAL PALM (PARKING, 10' CT.) 77 COCOPLUM, (S.B. maintain at 3' h) 25 Dwf. IXORA (S.B.) 20 FLAX LILY (S.B.) 32 SOCIETY GARLIC (ABOVE CODE) 20 FLAX LILY (S.B.) 32 SOCIETY GARLIC (ABOVE CODE) 20 Dwf. IXORA (S.B.) 20 FLAX LILY (S.B.) 13 FLAX LILY (S.B.) S S 5 PIGEON PLUM 7 'HIGHRISE' LIVE OAK (N.B., 14' HT.) NAPLES OUTFITTERS 50 SIMPSON STOPPER (N.B.; 5' Ht., 4' O.C.) 1 SUGARBERRY (N.B., 14' HT.) 19 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 13 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 1 ROYAL PALM (PARKING, 10' CT.) MATCHLINE 'A'15 WALTER'S VIBURNUM W.B. #2: REPLACEMENT (5' Ht., 4' O.C.) FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 30 MPH3117 sf. V UA 171 sf. V UA FLORITAM SOD CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IT'S THE LAW! DIAL 811 Know what's BELOW. Call before you dig. 811 SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. SCALE 1" = 20' 60'0' 10' 20' 40' 4 TREES (West Buffer #2-Replacement) 30 SHRUBS BUFFER REPLACEMENT PLANTING SYMBOLS (West Buffer #2-Replacement)P:\Drawings\2017 Jobs\RaceTrac Shadow Lawn\Drawings\RT_Shadowlawn-Version 3_LS.dwg, 2/1/2018 4:28:17 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 T.O. SLAB 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 21' - 2" T.O. ROOF 25' - 0"M-5M-5M-5EF-1EF-1M-1SB-1EF-1M-5M-5M-5EF-1EF-2EF-2WS-133 3 7 19 15 10 16 15 16 2 2M-1M-1M-5M-5EF-1GL-5GL-5M-3M-3WS-1GL-5M-3SS-1WS-1EF-2EF-2EF-2EF-1EF-1SS-1 SB-1 SS-1 SB-1 SS-1 T.O. SLAB 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 21' - 2" T.O. ROOF 25' - 0"GL-7M-3EF-1EF-1EF-2EF-2M-1SS-1EF-2M-5EF-1M-5M-5WS-13 3337 16 19 1 15 M-1M-5GL-5EF-1M-3M-5M-5M-1M-1EF-2EF-1EF-1SS-1SB-1SS-1SB-1WS-1 GL-5 M-3 T.O. SLAB 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 21' - 2" T.O. ROOF 25' - 0"M-5M-5EP-1EP-1SS-1EF-2EF-1EF-1EF-2EF-2M-1M-2EP-1EF-1EP-1M-2EP-1M-2WS-11 15 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 10 10 10 13 14 1 19 20 21 21 21 8 M-1M-5GL-5M-5SB-1SS-1M-5M-5M-1M-5EP-1EP-12222 T.O. SLAB 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 21' - 2" T.O. ROOF 25' - 0"M-5EP-1M-5M-3M-5EF-2SS-1EF-1SS-1GL-5SS-1EF-2AW-1EF-1EF-1EF-2EF-2M-1SS-1M-3GL-5AW-1EF-1SS-1SS-1M-5EF-1EF-1EF-2EF-2EP-1GL-7WS-1GL-5445 7 8 8 10 10 1112 12 1 1 18 3 3 3 3 3 10 15 1 15 GL-5M-3SB-1EP-1M-5M-5M-5M-1M-5EF-1SS-1EF-2SS-1WS-1 GL-5 SB-1 SS-1 AW-1AW-1ELEVATION SIGNAGE DIMENSIONS RT PARALLELOGRAM 13'-5/8" x 3'-0"FRONT LEFT RIGHT AREA 40 SF 42 SFBANNER RT PARALLELOGRAM 7'-8" x 5'-6" 13'-5/8" x 3'-0" 7'-8" x 5'-6" 42 SF 40 SF BANNER MATERIAL % OF ELEVATION STONE EIFS 24% 30% GLAZING METAL WOOD 25% 10% 11% FRONT ELEVATION 2,378 TOTAL SF SQ. FOOT. 585 716 594 228 255 MATERIAL % OF ELEVATION STONE EIFS 15% 47% GLAZING METAL WOOD 12% 17% 9% LEFT ELEVATION 1,304 TOTAL SF SQ. FOOT. 191 607 157 233 116 MATERIAL % OF ELEVATION STONE EIFS 31% 55% GLAZING METAL WOOD 2% 11% 1% REAR ELEVATION 2,291 TOTAL SF SQ. FOOT. 713 1,258 56 247 17 MATERIAL % OF ELEVATION STONE EIFS 17% 42% GLAZING METAL WOOD 24% 2% 15% RIGHT ELEVATION 1,219 TOTAL SF SQ. FOOT. 204 512 294 31 178 3/16" = 1'-0"1 LEFT ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"2 RIGHT ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"3 REAR ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"4 FRONT ELEVATION Mark S. Salopek, LLC DATE DESCRIPTION ISSUE/REVISION RECORD THESE PLANS ARE SUBJECT TO FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS: ANY USE OF SAME WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. IS PROHIBITED. 2016 RACETRAC PETROLEUM INC. COPYRIGHT NOTICE DESIGN PROFESSIONALS RaceTrac RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. 3225 CUMBERLAND BOULEVARD SUITE 100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30339 (770) 431-7600 PROJECT NAME RACETRAC STORE NUMBER PROTOTYPE SERIES 5.5K PLAN MODIFICATION NOTICE SPB NO.DATE STANDARD PLAN BULLETINS (SPB) MODIFY THE PROTOTYPE SERIES SET NOTED ABOVE. THE LISTED SPB REPRESENTS THE LATEST MODIFICATION INCORPORATED TO THIS PROTOTYPE SERIES SET AT ORIGINAL RELEASE. THE ISSUE/ REVISION RECORD COLUMN ABOVE LISTS ANY REVISIONS OR SPB INCORPORATED IN THIS SET AFTER THE ORIGINAL RELEASE. CONTACT RACETRAC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION FOR ANY SUBSEQUENT BULLETINS NOT INCORPORATED HEREIN. PROFESSIONAL SEAL PROJECT NUMBER SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER ® RaceTrac® 9/13/17 PRELIMINARY PACKAGE 3638 WEST GALLOWAY DRIVE RICHFIELD, OH 44286 PHONE: (330-802-6265) 11/27/17 PRELIMINARY PACKAGE SHAWDOWLAWN FLORIDA #1266 2017 EF-LH-SV-M 0603 2017157.68 08.15.170603 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 300E NAPLES TAMIAMI TRAIL & SHADOWLAWN AVE--EXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEDULE AWNING AW -1 -ALUMINUM AWNING SELECTED BY RACETRAC CAST STONE CS-1 CONTINENTAL CAST STONE OR APPROVED OTHER MATCH BORAL TUSCAN LINTEL CHAMPAGNE COLOR 1102 NATURAL STONE; MORTAR COLOR "LIGHT BUFF" EIFS EF-1 STO STO THERM CI "FINE FINISH" APPLICATION; COLOR TO MATCH SW #6113 "INTERACTIVE CREAM" EF-2 STO STO THERM CI "FINE FINISH" APPLICATION; COLOR TO MATCH SW #6094 "SENSATIONAL SAND" GLAZING GL-5 1-5/16" IMPACT RATED INSULATED LAMINATED GLAZING CLIMATE ZONES 1 OR 2: IGU 0.28 U-FACTOR, SHGC PF>0.5 = 0.27 (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED 70XL LOW-E #2 + 1/2" AIR + 1/4" CLEAR + 0.90 SG + 1/4" CLEAR) OR APPROVED ALTERNATE GL-7 1-5/16" IMPACT RATED ACID ETCHED INSULATED GLAZING CLIMATE ZONES 1 OR 2: IGU 0.28 U-FACTOR, SHGC PF>0.5 = 0.27 (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED 70XL LOW-E #2 + 1/2" AIR + 1/4" CLEAR SATIN ETCHED #3 + 0.90 SG + 1/4" CLEAR) OR APPROVED ALTERATE METAL M-1 PREFINISHED4" 2-PIECE COMPRESSION METAL COVER METAL TO MATCH STOREFRONT COLOR DRAK BRONZE M-2 COLOR DARK BRONZE. METAL TO MATCH STOREFRONT COLOR DARK BRONZE M-3 VISTAWALL (OR APPROVED ALTERNATE) FG-5000 STOREFRONT SYSTEM (OR APPROVED ALTERNATE) PREFINISHED DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM AA-MI2C22A44 M-5 REYNOBOND METAL TO MATCH STOREFRONT; COLOR DARK BRONZE. M-7 BORAL TRUEXTERIOR DOUBLE-4 BEADBOARD PAINT INTERACTIVE CREAM PAINT EP-1 SHERWIN WILLIAMS EXTERIOR PAINT TO MATCH DARK BRONZE EP-2 SHERWIN WILLIAMS EXTERIOR PAINT AS SELECTED BY RACETRAC PAINT AS SELECTEC BY RACETRAC FOR SLAT WALL METAL SUPPORTS ROOFING DURO DUROLAST 50 MIL MEMBRANE ROOFING SYSTEM WHITE; MECHANICALLY FASTENED STACKED STONE SS-1 BORAL ASPEN COUNTRY LEDGESTONE WET STACK APPLICATION. MORTAR COLOR "LIGHT BUFF" STONE BAND SB-1 BORAL TUSCAN LINTEL CHAMPAGNE MORTAR COLOR "LIGHT BUFF" WOOD SLATS WS-1 COMPACTWOOD 1/2" THICKNESS WALNUT QC "CW-QCWAL-S-0410-12 1 WALL MOUNTED SECURITY CAMERA. 2 3" SQUARE DOWNSPOUT. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR CONNECTIONS. 3 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT BEYOND 4 REFER TO DETAILS FOR CAST STONE SHAPES. 5 HOSE BIBB; REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS. 6 CEILING FAN; REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS. 7 ILLUMINATED SIGN PANEL BY OWNER; PAINT SUPPORT STRUCTURE EP-1. 8 BRONZE BREAK METAL WRAP AT WINDOW JAMB, TYPICAL. 9 ROOFING MEMBRANE TO BE RUN UP CLERESTORY TO UNDERSIDE OF WINDOW. REFER TO WALL SECITONS. 10 ACM PANEL REVEAL LINE. REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS. 11 NOT USED. 12 EMERGENCY FUEL SHUT OFF SWITCH. MOUNT TOP OF SIGN AT 50" A.F.F. 13 LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE C/T AND METER. 14 GENERATOR TAP BOX - SEE ELECTRICAL FOR LOCATION. 15 SECURITY CAMERA MOUNTED TO PATIO FASCIA. 16 OVERFLOW SPILL SCUPPER. 18 PACKAGE PASSER. REFER TO EQUIPMENT PLAN. 19 SPILL SCUPPER. REFER TO DETAIL. 20 PROVIDE METAL GUARD GATE AT LADDER TO 8' AFF WITH LOCKING HASP 21 4'-0" WIDE x 1'-7" HIGH SCUPPER. REFER TO DETAILS ON SHEET A201. 22 STOP STONE 6" BEFORE ROUGH OPENING --ELEVATION KEY NOTES A300E 12/20/17 4'-0"DIMENSIONS VARYGAS CANOPY FRONT ELEVATIONLEFT SIDE VIEW - RED CANOPYDIMENSIONS VARYRIGHT SIDE VIEW - RED CANOPY4'-0"CENTERED ONVERTICAL DIMENSIONDIMENSIONS VARY4'-0"1’-11”1’-11”50 SF & 30 SF Canopy LED Logo Sign - Tan CanopyCOLOR SCHEDULEWhitePMS 485 Red3M Sapphire Blue 60 SF Price Sign - Scroll (N1, N2) 3'-7"10 1/8”8 3/8"11'-2"1'-7 5/8"8'-0"4" Specifications: Sign Faces: • Logo panel: Bronze alluminum panel with parallelogram mounted to the surface. Parallelogram to be channel letter-type construction with .177” thick Polycarbonate face panels with 2nd surface applied translucent vinyl graphics. Parallelogram copy to be digitally printed red background stripes and white border with blue area of logo graphic also printed. Cabinet and trim cap to be red to match Axzo Nobel #SIGN20448. • Regular Unleaded Product Panel: Solar Grade Polycarbonate; Background to be 1st surface applied 3M vinyl opaque 180C-22 Matte Black; “Regular” to be show- through white or 1st surface applied 3M vinyl translucent 3630-020 White. • Diesel Product Panel: Solar Grade Polycarbonate; Background to be 1st surface applied 3M vinyl translucent 3630-26 Green; “Diesel” to be show-through white or 1st surface applied 3M vinyl translucent 3630-020 White. • E85 Product Panel: Solar Grade Polycarbonate; background to be 1st surface applied 3M Translucent Yellow Vinyl 3630-015 Yellow; “E85" black text color.E85Page 28 R55K1266 - Shadowlawn Shadowlawn Drive Naples, FL 34112 Color Schedule GENERAL NOTE: ALL WORK SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH RECOGNIZED INDUSTRY STANDARDS, MANUFACTURER’S RECOMMENDATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES. NO SUBSTITUTIONS ALLOWED. C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 SUPPLIER(S)PART NUMBER(S) AKZO NOBEL MATTHEWS Akzo SIGN91780 Red* MP81489 R137186 LVS Semi-Gloss V1.1 Racetrac Red COLOR RED MA AKZO NOBEL TTHEWS MP83729 R143456 L Akzo Sign 10553 White* VS Semi Gloss V1.1 WhiteWHITE AKZO NOBEL MATTHEWS Duronodic Bronze 31054 Duronodic Bronze (see sample provided)DARK BRONZE AKZO NOBEL MATTHEWSYELLOW Akzo Sign Custom Color Racetrac Yellow MP81986 R139032 LVS Semi-Gloss V1.1 Yellow AKZO NOBEL MATTHEWS 3M BLUE PRICER BLACK 3630-22 Black Translucent Vinyl C7 C8 C9 C10 3M 3630-156 Vivid Green Translucent VinylPRICER GREEN 3M 3630-143 Poppy Red Translucent Vinyl ORACAL 8500-323 Coral Red Translucent Vinyl 3M PRICER RED PRICER ORANGE AWNING YELLOW 7725-105 Harvest Gold Opaque Vinyl C11 AKZO NOBELAWNING RED #1 C12 3MAWNING RED #2 7725-58 Burgundy Opaque Vinyl MATTHEWS PMS 1807C Color Match (see provided sample) PMS 1807C Color Match (see provided sample) C13 AKZO NOBELAWNING GREEN #1 C14 3MAWNING GREEN #2 7725-56 Dark Green Opaque Vinyl MATTHEWS PMS 1348C Color Match (see provided sample) PMS 348C Color Match (see provided sample) C15 AKZO NOBELAWNING LT. GREEN #1 C16 3MAWNING LT. GREEN #2 3635-91 Smoke Grey MATTHEWS SW 6444 Color Match (see provided sample) SW 6444 Color Match (see provided sample) C17 3MAWNING BRONZE #2 180C-22 Matte Black C18 3MADDRESS WHITE 7725-10 White Opaque Vinyl R A C E T R A C PRINT-Provided by Miratec Systems S W I R L W O RLD PRINT-Provided by Miratec Systems 3M Akzo Code Sign3243 Blue*MP02136 R143265 LVS Semi-Gloss V1.1 Sultan Blue 7725-17 Vivid Blue Opaque Vinyl Shadowlawn Drive Naples, FL 34112 Page 2 Sign Legend Canopy Cloud SignI1 Canopy Cloud SignI2 I1 I2 Site Plan - Option 1 GENERAL NOTE: ALL WORK SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH RECOGNIZED INDUSTRY STANDARDS, MANUFACTURER’S RECOMMENDATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES. NO SUBSTITUTIONS ALLOWED. Shadowlawn Drive Naples, FL 34112 Page 4 Sign Legend Canopy Cloud SignI1 Canopy Cloud SignI2 I1 I2 Site Plan - Option 2 GENERAL NOTE: ALL WORK SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH RECOGNIZED INDUSTRY STANDARDS, MANUFACTURER’S RECOMMENDATIONS AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES. NO SUBSTITUTIONS ALLOWED. Shadowlawn Drive Naples, FL 34112 Page 3 I3 Canopy Cloud SignI3 12 SqFt Canopy LED Logo Sign - I1, I2 - Option 1 - Code Required SINGLE FACED QUANTITY 3 36 SqFt Total1'-7 7/8"37'-2 /4" Shadowlawn Drive Naples, FL 34112 Page 5 10 5/8"5'-8 1/16" 5 SqFt Scale: 1/4”= 1’-0”3'-4 1/2"914'-9 /16"1'-9 5/8"111'-6 /2" 21 SqFt Scale: 1/4”= 1’-0” 50 SqFt Canopy LED Logo Sign - I1 - Option 2 - Requested SINGLE FACED QUANTITY 1 50 SqFt Total Scale: 1/4”= 1’-0” 30 SqFt Canopy LED Logo Sign - I 2/I3 - Option 2 - Requested SINGLE FACED QUANTITY 2 60 SqFt Total2'-7 1/2"11'-6"1'-4 13/16"38'-11 /4" 13 SqFt TBD LIT STRIPE TBD LIT STRIPE 1'-6" CORNER 1'-6" CORNER RIGHT ELEVATION TBD' LIT STRIPE 1'-6" CORNER 1'-6" CORNER LEFT ELEVATION 1'-6" CORNER 1'-6" CORNER REAR ELEVATION TBD VINYL STRIPE (EXISTING, BY OTHERS) 1'-6" CORNER 1'-6" CORNER4'-0"(TYP)TBD LIT STRIPE TBD LIT STRIPE 1'-6" CORNER 1'-6" CORNER RIGHT ELEVATION TBD' LIT STRIPE 1'-6" CORNER 1'-6" CORNER LEFT ELEVATION 1'-6" CORNER 1'-6" CORNER REAR ELEVATION TBD VINYL STRIPE (EXISTING, BY OTHERS) 1'-6" CORNER 1'-6" CORNER4'-0"(TYP)12 SqFt Canopy LED Logo Sign - I1, I2 - Option 1 - Code Required 12 SqFt Canopy LED Logo Sign - I1, I2 - Option 1 - Code Required 50 SqFt Canopy LED Logo Sign - I1 - Option 2 - Requested 30 SqFt Canopy LED Logo Sign - I 2 - Option 2 - Requested Scale: 1/32”= 1’-0” Scale: 1/32”= 1’-0” December 21, 2017 Fed Reischl, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Drive Deviations for Redevelopment PL20170002552 2nd Submittal Mr. Reischl: Attached for approval, please find the following items as they relate to the above referenced project: 1. One (1) copy of the Letter of Authorization from Property Owners to RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc. (copy of Purchase Contract); 2. One (1) copy of the shareholder listing for the applicant and property owners; 3. One (1) copy of the Approved Addressing Checklist; 4. One (1) copy of the Site Plan with Deviations Narrative; 5. One (1) signed and sealed Boundary Surveys prepared by Metron Surveying and Mapping, LLC; 6. One (1) 24” x 36” copy of the Color Architectural Elevations; 7. One (1) copy of the RaceTrac Canopy Sign Package; 8. One (1) signed and sealed sets of Landscape Plans prepared by DMJA; 9. One (1) copy of the color landscape buffer illustrations prepared by DMJA 10. One (1) 24” x 36” signed and sealed Site Development with Deviations Plans prepared by DeLisi Fitzgerald, Inc.; In response to the comment letter dated November 14, 2017, please find the following responses in order as received: ZONING REVIEW Comment 1 Canopy Sign Area (Deviation #2) - provide a side-by-side graphic showing the permitted sign size and requested sign size. Response 1 The attached RaceTrac Sign Package includes a side by side comparison of the requested sign and the permitted sign. Comment 2 For Justifications, provide old Code requirements to show that the property had a reasonable expectation of requested Deviations. Response 2 References to the LDC in effect at the time the property was originally developed has been added the deviation justifications where applicable. LANDSCAPE REVIEW Comment 1 A portion of the type 'A' buffer required and shown on the approved landscape plans for ABC Liquor along the east property line will be eliminated (4 south-most trees in that buffer) due to the proposed layout of the RaceTrac. Please also account for these trees in the deviations. Response 1 The four impacted trees in the stated buffer have been shown to be replaced within the ABC Liquor site and have been accounted for in the deviations. Comment 2 Since cypress trees are bare over the Winter, they do not serve as an adequate buffer tree. Please change the cypress trees in the east buffer to another canopy tree that is evergreen. Response 2 Plant species within the buffer have been changed. Comment 3 Please specify enhancements (such as size of plant material) to compensate for the lack of berm in deviation #7. Since the LDC requires parts of right of way buffers at service stations to be 8' high combined between the 3' berm and the 5' high hedge, please specify a percentage of the shrubs that will be 8' high min. as one of the enhancements. Response 3 The Landscape Plans have been revised consistent with the discussions with Staff during the November 7th comment review meeting. Comment 4 Please provide a justification for the use of smaller trees. It appears there is an overhead power line that runs along this buffer which could be a justification. Also not that non-canopy trees will be provided at twice the rate of canopy trees per the LDC. Response 4 The Landscape Plans have been revised consistent with the discussions with Staff during the November 7th comment review meeting. Comment 5 Vehicular use area planting is shown in the west buffer. Per the LDC, perimeter buffers cannot count toward interior landscaping. Please add a deviation to allow VUA area in the buffer and provide enhanced planting specifications to compensate for this deviation. If this area is needed for VUA trees, there may not be enough room to accommodate both buffer trees and VUA trees. Response 5 The Landscape Plans have been revised consistent with the discussions with Staff during the November 7th comment review meeting. Comment 6 Please identify VUA. It appears the total VUA shown in the calcs is incorrect. Response 6 The VUA is hatched on the revised Landscape Plans. Please note that Deviation 9 and 10 have been added to request a reduction in the number of VUA Trees required and the use of 100% palms for proposed VUA Trees. Comment 7 It appears that hollys are being used at 1:1. 2 hollys equal 1 canopy tree Response 7 Hollys are no longer proposed and the Landscape Plans have been revised consistent with discussions with Staff during the November 7th comment review meeting. Comment 8 The general tree requirement can be met through buffer, VUA and foundation planting trees. Plan show additional general trees. These are not needed but can possibly serve as a type of enhanced planting to satisfy a deviation if needed. Response 8 The additional trees have been removed and the Landscape Plans have been revised consistent with the discussions with Staff during the November 7th comment review meeting. GIS REVIEW Comment 1 On Boundary and Topographic survey, please correct street name Shadowlawn Ave to Shadowlawn Drive. Response 1 Shadowlawn Drive has been corrected on the Boundary Survey. Comment 2 Please submit an approved Addressing Checklist. Response 2 The approved Addressing Checklist is included in this resubmittal. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Comment 1 5.05.08 D.2.b. Design features. The design of primary facades must include, at a minimum, two of the following design features identified in LDC section 5.05.08 D.2.b., one for buildings less than 5,000 sq. ft. Deviation 6: Staff does not support the Northeast (Rear) and Southeast (Side) facades as secondary facades. These two facades will be visible from public ROW’s. The required undulating berm is not being proposed and the planting along Shadowlawn appears to be code minimum. The architectural floor plan and buffer illustration renderings were not submitted with this application to verify proposed justification for the secondary facades. Although the applicant is proposing a landscape buffer along the side and rear of the building (Primary Façades) sufficient justification has not been provided. Consider additional building design treatments or taller trees along Shadowlawn. Provide cross section exhibit through Shadowlawn, proposed buffer up to and including the building to demonstrate the buffer will substantially obscure the primary facades from view of the ROW’s. Response 1 The Architectural Elevations have been revised consistent with the discussions with Staff during the November 7th comment review meeting. COUNTY ATTORNEY REVIEW Comment 1 Please provide either 1) an Affidavit of Authorization, or 2) written evidence of consent to this petition, from all property owners. Response 1 Authorizations have been provided from all property owners. Comment 2 Please provide a list of all shareholders or anyone with an equitable interest in the property owners and applicant. Response 2 The list of shareholders is provided for the applicant and all properties except the ABC Property. A letter from RaceTrac’s in-house counsel is included addressing the shareholders for the ABC Property. Comment 3 LDC 10.02.03 F 1. states that "A site plan with deviations shall provide a means for redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations...and deviations from site features...when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings, structures or site features nonconforming." As discussed at the pre app, please provide evidence for each of the deviations that "the passing of time has rendered these features nonconforming." For example, for Deviation #1, provide evidence that that, at some point in the past, the front yard setback was 27 feet or less; for Deviation #3, provide evidence that, at some point in the past, you would have been permitted to have a canopy sign on a facade not facing a street or highway; etc... Please discuss this further with staff if you have questions about this requirement. Response 3 The deviations have been expanded to provide reference to the prior code requirements. Comment 4 See handwritten markups on the proposed deviation language and site plan, to be provided by separate e-mail from the planner. Response 4 The handwritten mark-ups were not provided. The deviation language has been revised consistent with CAO comments received on recent projects. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING REVIEW Comment 1 Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Revise site plan to remove the proposed right in condition for the Shadowlawn access closest to the 41 intersection. This access does not meet access management however staff will consider a right out condition only. Response 1 The ultimate configuration of the southern Shadowlawn driveway will be determined at the time of SDP. Comment 2 Additional Items that need to be addressed for Transportation Review: Rev.1: Provide FDOT confirmation-initial-conceptual approval of access location on 41 location and turn lane condition. Response 2 A pre-application meeting was held with FDOT on June 26, 2017. FDOT is agreeable to the consolidation of the existing four access points to a single right- in/right-out driveway on US 41. If you require any additional information, please contact our office at (239) 418-0691. Sincerely, DELISI FITZGERALD, INC. John T. Wojdak, P.E. Vice President Project No.: 21442 cc: Tom Hardy with attachments October 6, 2017 Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment To Whom It May Concern: Attached for approval, please find the following items as they relate to the above referenced project: 1. One (1) check in the amount of $1,000.00 for the Application Fee; 2. One (1) check in the amount of $925.00 for the Legal Advertising Fee; 3. Nine (9) copies of the Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment Application; 4. One (1) signed and notarized Affidavit of Authorization Form; 5. One (1) copy of the Letter of Authorization from Property Owner to RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc. (copy of Purchase Contract); 6. Nine (9) copies of the Addressing Checklist; 7. One (1) copy of the Pre-Application Meeting Notes; 8. Nine (9) copies of the Parcel Information & Location Map; 9. Nine (9) copies of the Site Plan with Deviations Narrative; 10. Nine (9) copies of the Sign Package; 11. Nine (9) 11” x 17” copies of the Aerial & Adjacent Uses Exhibit; 12. Nine (9) signed and sealed Boundary Surveys prepared by Metron Surveying and Mapping, LLC; 13. Nine (9) 24” x 36” sets of Color Architectural Elevations; 14. Nine (9) signed and sealed sets of Landscape Plans prepared by DMJA ; 15. Nine (9) 24” x 36” signed and sealed Site Development with Deviations Plans prepared by DeLisi Fitzgerald, Inc.; 16. One (1) CD containing pdf’s of submittal items. If you require any additional information, please contact our office at (239) 418-0691. Sincerely, DELISI FITZGERALD, INC. John T. Wojdak, P.E. Vice President Project No.: 21442 cc: Tom Hardy with attachments C-ounty COTTIER COUNW GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANA6EMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierggv.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FLORIDA 34104 l2t9l2'2-Z4OO Pre-Application Meeting Notes Petition Type:DR Date and Time. July 25, 2017 at 3:00 Assig ned planner: Fred Reischl, AICP Engineering Manager (for PPIJs and FP's): Project lnformation Proj ect Name: RaceTrac Facility with Fuel Pumps PL*.20170002552 Property lD #:61834720003 +Current Zoning . C-4-GTMUD-MXD City . Naples state: FL zip: - Project Address:Shadowlawn & US41 Applicant:RaceTrac Ag ent Name: John Wojdak, PE Phone .239-418-0691 Agent/Firm Address: Delisi Fitzgerald city: Fort MYers state: FL zip: _ Property ownerr frlsc' Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: N/A iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: _ iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: v. lf there is an ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. lf the project is within a plat, provide the name and AR#/pL#: t t Crwn w Z8(x) NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPIES, FLORIDA 34104 1239l.Z'2-24OO Meeting Notes Fttz .'?/@trfr-ot^/re=7-6;-Za 13 r .4s.e6+ =/rAZ- 5t+alzt-.J 6- fu4ps ?ottgV6VaaT ltrD 8*zar.ta-_f . ruzx- /,?r* ltt*9 - ct,nf cryfi. F,+( ,rfq 4f</,hp.r' frO 4-ffi1 or' ,-Er; 1:11.. A |-FFF\. f*,",,t Aic r PchJ L/ d- NX Ai 1o1y,41fi A*fF--n rty'6/4 Iftr{r ,,tt 1;-f cetuql 5t ). B-fifE"t -4q ,tc lz.t-Q-, aF.1 (h ,trtl='fEa- p. /+lc r ,1 u-frr-* Fr\. A+<-F-zlac , Atf-.a w..'d Ea Pr*P C+tc, nl f-Xcf{FtZ P-rtt ,lcat\ I it t ^/ C t--nF-n t,J Vvq Laytt fc,+f F C4Laf . -'/ / at. n 0/- 7/J h €<.// €va/u,lL 4,/a t't d Arrazt*"nd -"c/ Trr LO*t\R oL'l la I d r /, ua ,:LL t-rbo updated 7 /L9/2077 Page l3of5 COLTIER COUNTY 6OVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov,net Disclaimer: lnformation provided by staff to applicant duing the pre-Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could aise duing fhe process. The Administrctive code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applicafions mus, satlsry. Any checktists provided of required data .for an applicatlon may not fully outline what is needed. lt is the applicant's responsibiility toprovide all rcquired data. t C-OUvtw Z8OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FLORIDA 34104 12391252-Z4OO Meeting Notes Drsfa uc€tveR Di77hD €OOe'r oF rEx-d(b C-H ,o5.otr 5,o5. o t;s.S -H,L\<- ,oL, I ra\|EE{A Y A?R-IES. t rFf 4 ht<rY,o J.XrrPr c/A<\o^-)-fon- \eVrA-r-rar-lS. Page l2of5 COLTIER COUNW GOVERNMENT 6ROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net L u pdated 7 /L9/2077 r C-rwmw Pre-Application Meeting Sign-ln Sheet PL# aotT oOO a ssa Collier County Contact lnformation: Name Review Discipline Phone Email !David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net !Summer Araque 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and ReSulatory Management 252-5887 claudineauclair@colliergov.net d Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2367 stephenbaluch@colliergov.net f Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring lauriebeard@colliergov.net !Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craigbrown@colliergov.net x Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 h eidiashton@colliergov.net I John Degtasis Zoning Services / Planning Tech 252-1050 johndeblasis@colliergov.net fi Kay Deselem Zoning Services 252-2s86 kaydeselem@colliergov.net ! Date Fey North Collier Fire 597-9227 dfey@northcollierf ire.com I Eric Fey, P.E Utility Planning 252-7037 ericfey@colliergov.net tr Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@collier gov.net ! Paula Fleishman lmpact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net !James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5771 jamesf rench@colliergov.net I Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons@colliergov.net !Storm Gewirtz, P.E Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 stormgewirtz@colliergov.net n Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancygundlach@collie rgov.net l Shar Hingson Greater Naples Fire District shingson@gnfire.org E John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 f Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodih hes@colliergov.net !Alicia Humphries Right-Of-Way Permitting 252-2326 ! Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Plannin 252-2387 ma rcia kenda ll@collier gov.net - Garrett Louviere, P.E 252-2526 rrettlouviere@collie rgov.net !Thomas Mastrobeno Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomasmastroberto@collier gov.net ! Jack McKenna, P.E.En ineering Services jackmckenna @collier net .R Matt McLean, P.E.Development Review 0irector matthewmclean @colli . net J Michele Mosca, AtCp - &pital Project Planning 252-2466 u pdated 7 /L9 /2017 Page l4of5 COTTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www,colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 12391Z'2-24OO Environmental Review 2s2-5782 774-2800 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net aliciahumphries@colliergov.net Transportation Planning 252-2977 252-8279 michelemosca@colliergov.net Co et C.wmty COLTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact lnformation : 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 12?9l.25?-24OO r'b7 Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net Stefanie Nawrocki Development Review - Zoning 252-2373 stefanienawrocki@colliergov.net - Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richardorth@colliergov.net Brandy Otero Translt 252-5859 bran dyotero@colliergov.net Utility lmpact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net X Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Division 252-4277 fredreischl@colliergov.net f Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 591-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com - Daniel Roman, P.E Engineering Utilities 252-2538 danielroman@colliergov.net L Brett Rosenblum, P.E Development Review Principal Project lvlanager 252-290s brettrosenblum@colliergov.net ffi tvtichaelsawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.netI!Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov. net E chris scott, AtcP Oevelopment Review - Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov, net f, Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 petershawinsky@colliergov.net Camden Smith Zoning Division Operations ca mdensm ith @ colliergov.netxScott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-5740 scottstone@colliergov.net .! / Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net M Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 ma rktem p leton @ colliergov.net Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 sicavelasco@colliergov.net I Jon Walsh, P.E Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net E David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net !Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review kirstenwilkie@colli . net !Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning christinewillou ghby@colliergov.net Name Representing Phone Email @r/d S*r'cFz 6kffiZ y'h%Ee ftz ? a-|G^ /LO 3^e'G.-a*^r W c6;f m L 4lY oaqt I 1cgro"lA trAceowa.u f4arfivac WM updated 7 /L9/2077 Page l5of5 I I Brandi Pollard 252-1042 Jessica Velasco 252-5518 252-5748 , L frra- UrA\ho. S\".^,...'hrhn)Ocardcal-.r.Y C-ovmty P120170002552 Gro#th Managem ent Department Zoning Division PRE-APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Camden Smith STAFF FORM FOR SUPPTEMENTAT PRE-APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Agent to list for PL# RaceTrac Petroleum, lnc. - Applicant & Authorized Agent of Ex. Owners DeLisiFitzgerald, lnc. - Consultant/Agent to RaceTrac Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) > See Attached list. Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment Please list the density requests of the pro.iect, if applicable, and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply) and/or deviations the applicant is seeking: The two existing service stations and existing office will be redeveloped as a RaceTrac convenience store (5,411 square feet) with 18 fuel pumps. See Attached preliminary Site plan. Details about Project (choose type that applies): The pre-app request is for a Site w/ Deviations for Redevelopment. The deviations are predominantly for structure setbacks and buffers. RaceTrac wishes to redevelop two existing service stations along with the existing office to the north as a new convenience food and beverage use with fuel pumps. Supplemental lnformation provided by: Name John T, Wojdak, p.E. Title VP, DelisiFitzgerald, tnc. Email iohn@delisifitzserald.com Phone 239{18{691 Created April5, 2017 [ocation: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff tnformation ) Z(rIr! olirir . 280 t{afi ttcE€d'e etE . i@, Fbib 3410{ . 23$2OA2OO . ffryo s!n/.rEt Applicont/Agent moy olso send site pldhs ot conceptuol plons fot review in odvonce if desied. John T. Wojdak, P.E. DelisiFitzgerald, lnc. iohn@delisifitzserald.com 239-418-0691 Crwmty COTLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FTORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAx: (239) 252-53s8 SITE PI.AN WITH DEVIATIONS FOR REDEVETOPMENT IDC Section 10.02.03 F Ch. 6 I of the Administrative Code PRO.,ECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED To be completed by stoff APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s):John T. Wojdak, P.E. Address: 1605 Hendry Street City:Fort Myers FL ztP.33901 Telep 6on". (239) 418-0691 cell: N/A State: Fax: E-Mail Address: john@delisifitzgerald.com Name of Agent:John T. Wojdak, P.E. Firm. john@delisifi tzgerald.com Address: 1605 Hendry Street one: (239)418-0691 (gll; N/A ciry; Fort Myers state:FL ztP. 33901 Teleph t3x; N/A E-Mail Address: BE AWARE THAT COLTIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGTY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPTIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. CORRESPONDING SDP, SDPA, SIP INFORMATION PLANNER/PROJECT MANAGER, DATE OF SUBMITTAI: 4/7t/2077 lF KNOWN: Fred Reischt Page 1 of 4 This application shall be submitted in conjunction with one of the following: site development plan, site development plan amendment, or site improvement plan. PROJECT NAME/PL# lF KNOWN: laceTrac at Shadowlawn Drive i PL2o17ooo2552 C-,ou,nty COTIIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliersov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FI-ORIDA 34104 (2391 2s2-2400 FAx: (239) 252-63s8 INFORMATION REGARDING DEVIATION REqUESTS A site plan with deviations for redevelopment provides a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations (excluding height), architectural deviations, and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping, parking, and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings, structures, or site features nonconforming. A site plan with deviations may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan, site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03. Except for the requested deviations, the site plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03. In accordance with LDC section 10.02.03 F, "redevelopment" shall mean the renovation, restoration, or remodeling ofa building or structure, or required infrastructure, in whole or in part, where the existing buildings, structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. DEVITATION REQUESTS The application must address the follow requirements. Please attach the required narratives and explanations. l. A narrative of the redevelopment project and how it is consistent with the standards for approval, LOC section 10.02.03 F.7, 2. Description of each requested deviation and justification for each request. Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition. The LDC section for which the deviation seeks relief from shall be identified. 3. Proiect enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly identified on the site plan and explanation provided. 4. Deviation Request types: Zoning Deviation Requests - Check all that may be impacted by the request. Dimensional standards (excluding height) Parking Architectwal Landscape / Buffers Other site features: Engineering Deviation Requests - Check all that may be impacted by the request, Stormwater Pathways Transportation Planning Other site features: tr tr E tr tr tr tr tr tr 4/71/2077 Page 2 of 4 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Deviations The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the :r Crounty application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact ord attached to each section. lncomplete submittals will not be accepted. er list with cover sheets I SoAr^tffect ?otnCA *, ADDITIONAI. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: ' Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project mana8er. . Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of county commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEWCopGPfu,4L ( ,c,,*REQUIREO NOT REQUIRED Site Development Plan with Deviations for edevelo ment Application.9 d pleted 5DP/sDPA/SlP application and all associated aterials, includin all site n documents.9+V 1 w of Authorizati ned and notarizednst t/ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronical ly in PDF format n d Unl.ss w.iYcd by th. Projecr M@8.r 4/7t/2077 Page 3 of 4 COttIER COUNW GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierqov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLOR|DA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAx: (239) 2s2-63s8 tr ! Copy for the Pre-Application Notes, if not submitted with 'DP/SDPA/SIP C-outrty COTIIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT . coll .net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) zs2-2400 FAx: (239) 2s2-53s8 FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre-Application Meeting: S500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: S1,125.00 Site Plan for Redevelopment: S1,000.00 Fire Code Plons Review Fees ore collected ot the time of applicotion submission ond those t'ees ore set forth by the Authority hoving jurisdiction. The Lond Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification moilers for Applicotions headed to heoring, ond this fee is collected prior to hedrinq. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks poyoble to: Eodrd of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Zoning 0ivision ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 zr t7 nt Signature Date Printed Name tr tr tr 4/17/2017 Page 4 of 4 I) Parcel ID Address: Description Owner: 2) Parcel ID: Address: Description Owner: 3) Parcel ID Address: Description Owner: 4) Parcel ID: Address: Description Owner Dellsr FrrzeERALD, lNC, Plonhinq - Eogit@dng - proiea nonoOenent Project Description & Location Map 61834720003 2891 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 341l2 NG+TCLFNO 211 50 25 COMM NE CNR OF LOT 36, S 1510.20FT, W SFT TO POB, W 137.85FT, S 92.07FT, SE ALONG N LINE OF TRAIL 149.96FT, N 38 DEG E ALG CURVE TO LEFT 33.96FT, N 160.13FT TO POB, LESS STIPUIATED ORDER OF TAKING CASE NO. 95.1010.CA OR 2403 PG 2369 SHADOWLAWN DEVELOPMENT 1 TRUST 6183468000.1 2887 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 N G+TC LF#2 FROMTHENECNROF LOT36, N GTC LF#2 S 1237.70FT,s 89 DEG W 5 FT TO POB, S 272.44FT,S 89 DEG W 138.05FT, S IO:].62F-|, N 5I DEGW 73.2TFT, N 329.70FT, N 89 DEG E 196FT TO POB, LESS STIPT,'LATED ORDER OF TAKING CASE NO. 95-I 302-CA PALUMBO TR, ROSEMARIE D d,/b/a SHADOWIAWN DEVELOPMENT 1 TRUST 26 780080007 2795 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 341 12 COL.LEE-CO COURT BEG AT SE COR OF LOT.THENCE WITH NE R,/W LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL N 5I DEG 58 MIN W 2OOFT, N 38 DEG 02 MIN E I25FT, N 75 DEG 46 MIN E 2OFT, S 49 DEG 49MIN E SOFT TO E LINE LOT ], S 175FT TO POB LESS ORDER OF TAKING CASE # 94.1749CA PARCEL 127 DESC IN OR 2!IO3 PG 2:]76 GUTIERREZ, JAIME A 2757 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 3.1I12 COL-LEE-CO COURT LOTS I + 2, BEG SW CNR LOT 35 NG&TCLR #2, SELY ALG R,Atr TAMTAMI TRL 18OFT, NLY 2OOFT, NWLY 18OFT TO PT W LINE LOT 35, SLY zOOFT POB LESS R/W & LESS OR 1157 PG 1403, LESS ORDER OF TAKING CASE #95-76.1-CA PAR NO I26 ABC PROPERTIES LTD 1605 Hendry Street . Fort Myers, FL 33901 . 239-418-0691 . 239-418-0692 fax 26 780040005 (PART OF) I.I ! t', t I 1 I 1t t\ 6c 4 ou )., a I II I dl Ti ,.t ; L I \ t I { ll / I -.1.I !.' gf \ F ,T TL-'t5J =''r a6 I q. i I *1rs.. 9l:! ;ia3!6qE]"r.tU si60-3r9%-".o :,,--6-- @9 -,j',]a-loUz_ttr ,/ r..si'f,t o :."]t"./ ,,.' ..8 Al--=-vz R I, f \o\4..\g6ooeoooo!,oo,o o o a) I,t: I I il ..1 -fIr l'"6@@ot"E1r9o -. __L I1...',,1lIII I I\t+ 1.,..,l 1 I L d $iln'ttI B I a 8t E;Tc:: H6t q 4 E t € , I 6 t I o l^i i$l ;+. $&- "fa 't I 9' i i __L_J o ; \- 4A ,&, d l 46fl&.nt,i"i3IN)ct)eP,iln:elltn-,d-,A\VE sa = c.,, lffi _5'utl rl(t 1.{ N<) { I C o s h-a-d';ilt?-ffiD R N D! ) hJF. <r .)arts)E BIa V.slildHs,] N)o,(,6 1try)aN)t.;IE;BB,l f AJN(rt (o t o7{,\.ififta-)rLi r;l .)).,]DEltiIs.t rr j f I\I' -:?tti' Irt. '/I \ 7),-n!t t,atYa9EId-*tEr.ls,ruIyjoA,==-=.o rc ,YH _) 0 tl,/ttq{B\NI B I :"4* ! Ila r G(,l I &, lm nrlrr,tr ,tr.i 1l H BE qqI;D 7 b. T rtr Hl9r , t a N(, (O(rl =rrmI q)o C nm t_r _tI 3 I L FA I ffi nsr g' H,E 7 o BI 16r-{3 o o = a =-t1 T)s C"'5 G ,it -a ,1I t^ -.1 rJ t\)() o, n I\Jt- (O a , a,ai m9.)C oU'.U l N (o O) N -5 a,3 a t,n ll t. IH f r t 7 I H; U t' From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: John Wojdak <John@delisifitzgerald.com > Friday, )uly 2t, 20L7 3:28 PM ReischlFred; thardy@racetrac.com; Drew Fitzgerald; Richard Yovanovich SmithCamden; BellowsRay; BosiMichael RE: 41 - Shadowlawn Good afternoon Fred, There is an existing facility with fuel pumps diagonally across the intersection. With Tuesdays pre-app, we'd like to initiate the Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment process. We wanted to get down the road with that a bit before filing the SDP & Waiver. John John T. Wojdak, P.E. Deltst FrrzceRnlD, lNc. Phnning - Engl/n,eering - Holfr Mo|,dge',,eat L605 Hendry Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 P: (239) 418-0691 F: (239) 418-0692 c: (239) s6s-3077 iohn@delisifi tzserald.com www.delisifi tzqerald.com From: ReischlFred Imailto:FredReischl@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, )uly 21, 2017 7:03 PM To: thardy@racetrac.com; Drew FiEgerald; John Wojdak; Richard yovanovich Cc: Smithcamden; BellowsRay; BosiMichael Subject: 41 - Shadowlawn Good afternoon! I was just assigned the Facility with Fuel Pumps. Judging by the team, it is RaceTrac. The pre-app says SDP with oeviations, however, it will also need an ASW since it is across 41 from Texaco, right? Thanks- Fred fial {"aol,l,arce Principal Planner 239-252-421L 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 rersov.netwww.coll C'-,oiu.>tty 1 SmithCamden From: sent: TO: su bj ect FW pL20170002552 (SDp) DIRECTION FROM CHRrS SCOTT EMAIL.txt wi 1 1 ough bych ri sti neFriday, July 21, 2017 1:51 P[4 ne.i schl rred; smi thcamden FW: P120170002 5 52 (SDP) Importance: Hi gh From: Scottch ri ssent: Friday, )uly 2I, 2017 11:01 AraTo: GMD cl i ent Servi ces <cMDcl i entservi ces@col I i ergov. net> ; Bel lowsRay <RayBel I owsGcol l i erqov. net> ; wi l l oughbych ri sti ne <chii sti newi'l I ouqhblGcol 1i e igov . neticc: McLeanMatthew <t4atthewMc Lean@col I i e rgov . net> subj ect: RE: P120170002552 (SDP) Importance: Hi gh Ray : r spoke with_the applicant (lohn with oelisi ritzgerald) on this requested pre-app. tte is actualiy seeking aSite Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment projects (DR) at this time, which meansthi s should be changed in cityview and assigned to one of your staff members. They are hoping togo through the DR process and get deviations approved prior to going through the expense of pr-eparing tu I I Enqr neerr nq pl ans (Sop). - christopher o. scott, Arcp, LEED-AP Planning t4anager - Development Review 239.252.2460 How are we doing? please cLrcK HERE to fill out a customer survey. we apprec iate your Feedbackl -----ori gi nal Appoi ntment----- From: CDS-CSent: wednesday, luly 19, 2OL7 8:12 AM To:, cDS-c; :ohn wojdak; wi 1loughbychristine; Ahmadvicky; Alcornchris; Amy Loc kha rt -ray1 o r ;AnthonyDavid; arnoldl,lichelle; AshtonHeidi; nucl a i rcl audi ne ; Baluchstephen; Bea rdLau ri e; BeasleyRachel; BrownA raquesumme r ; Browncraig; cascioceorge; CondominaDanny;crotteauKathynel I ; crowl eytti chael I e; oavid ogilvie; DeBlasiislohn; DeselemKay; dfey@northcol 1i erfi re. coml oumai sl,ti ke; Faul.knersue ; reyeri c ; Fl e i shmanpaul a ; Gewi rtzstorm; Gi bl i ncormac ; Gossel i nLi z ;Gundl achNancv : t-iouldsworth:6hn; Hughes:odi; HumphriesAl .icia; :acobrisa; j nageond@sfwmd . gov; J ohn son E ri c;Kendall[4arcia; rulakeatricia; KurtzGerald; LevyMichael; lmartin@sfwmd.gov;Louvi erecarrett; Martinezoscar; I'tas t robe rtoThomas ; Mccaught ryl4a ry ; McKennaJack; [4cKuenElly;McLeanMatthew; l40scatvti chel e; voxamannis; trtawrocki stefani e; orthnichafd; pajercraig; pattersonAmy; PepinEmily; p] iT:lga9: lyTd . gov ; pochma raNatal i e ; neischlrred; Rodriguezwanda; nomanoaniel; ROS e nb IumBrett: santabarbaraci no: sawverMi chael ; scottchri s; shawi nskypeter; shawn Hanson;SheaBarbara; page 1 FW PL20170002552 (SDp) DTRECTTON FROM CHRrS SCOTT EMAIL,txt Smithcamden; SmithDaniel; Stonescott; StrainMark; SuleckiAlexandra; SummersEllen; Sweetchad; ScottTami; TempletonMark; VanLengenKris; Velascolessica; WalshJonathan; WeeksDavid; wi c khamr l an ne ry subj ect: P120170002 5 52 (sDP) when: Tuesday, )u1y 25, 20L7 3:OO Pr4-4:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (uS & Canada). Where: conference Room c Pl anner: chri sti ne willoughby Fi re District: Greater Naples Project Description: to construct a 5,411 5F convenience store with 18 self-serve fue l pumps Parcel: 26780080007, 61834680004, 61834720003, and 26780040005 under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public reconds. rf you do not want your e-mai I address rel easedin response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead, contact thi s of f i ce by tel ephone oli n wri ti ng . Page 2 t RZ -1 i 4 5 9 q oo T.ta a)oCz -.,] o4I I I_.1:o =l!"F': o EEE t: l= l: .:"3*.>is+ ->u9=_D=>oz E gt P T, c r! R 6! E E: ,2-; B: ! Ei p:q E fii tl::c; ESEiitE;E iillES€3:ri-Er!!n.-------- l lal0 iiErt IFFE i;33s;5 d..........".-.;3!t !a i"t s!c"s a.!i;E ii iE;!fliriEI;rl9!!irl tlh;a -t3q d o k E a !Co 6 f, 6 =t ,qts x a 6 o I ! = 94 ;l I 6 4 F ;o_ 619P;Ei, I ,=1t(n Ez o 96 +; 6 ! BAYSDE STREEI o ii; q o-{ = f, =,o 1 il:t 05r2N 31: a tr---E:-:-_',]F:_l' ffi () .co o aPUD, 'o MXD, c{€TMUD+rXd Lr oootiilfu"sooo ;t^O0000 ,oov 0000 Y.Qo,""Q 0000088000 -C--aCoCCC E tr trtr ! D F tl Et]6C '6 {lt,o-Rl "" rlll :o_ TTTIIn MH,' t; Lr lt:I )'0RMF l'- It { RMF4(3) of =o To I I,l I ;-i I I I I I BUUD.Rl MH-"" UD.R1 //r Puo"'.. I rl 'i 0511N R F6- GTfUO- R F. nT-00 li ;r;i_!-i n 5 : I puo"'" puo"" R]I'F-6-BMUT}R2 !-L r!rl L1 !LrACCESSORY PAFIKING ZONE INOICATES CITY LIMITS INOICATES SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY \ COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TWP 50S RNG 25E SEC(S) 11 SO 1/2 0511S 6 i!!! iit llli ! iEI 7aa iit: !!gl r! t! tsl iiliiiir trr:!e: i:l i,!;i !-""i-r !igilr;.i !!ltrrlti I .t iliiii. I JI rl!" . " i !P! ! i r Ilr r r I iEI I I ' E fi!i!! SUBDIVISON INDEX ooooo!! a 6 t I ,1, 10 r11 Bq H t;t,t"t-- [_LLL THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A PAGE OF THE OFFICIAT ZONING ATLAS REFERREO TO ANO ADOPTED 8Y REFERENCE BY ORDINANCE NO, O'.41Of THE COUNTY OF COLLIER, FTORIDA, ADOPTED JUNE 22,2@', ASAMENOEO AY THE ZONING NOTES ANO SUBDIVISION INOEX REFERENCED HEREON 8Y-- --CHAIRMANATTEST CLERX ? I i COLL!ER COUNTY LDC 5.05.05 - Facilities with Fuel Pumps 'Ihe purpose of this section is to ensure that facilities with fuel pumps do not adversely irnpact adjacent land uses, especially residential land uses. The high levels of traffic, glare, and intensity of use associated with facilities with fuel pumps, particularly those open 24 hours, rnay be incornpatible with surounding uses, especially residential uses. Therefore, in the interest of protecting the health, safety, and general welfare of the public, the following regulations shall apply to the location, layout, drainage, operation, landscaping, parking, and permitted sales and service activities of facilities u,ith fuel pumps. Site design requirements Table of site design requirements Minimum dirnensions Site Standards Minirnum lot area (sq. ft.)30,000 Minirnulr lol width (fi.)150 Minin.rum lot depth (lt.)180 Separation liom adjacent facilities with fuel pumps (ft.) (based on distance between nearest poi[E 500 Mininum setbacks . all structurcs: Front yard (li. ) Side yard (ft.) Rear yard ( Ii. ) 50 40 ,10 Waiver of separation requirements T Thc BZA may, bv resolution, grant a waiver of part or all of the minirnurn separarion requirements set forth herein if it is demonstrated by the applicant and detemined by the BZA that the site proposed for development of a facility with fuel pumps is separated fiom another facilit_v $,ith fuel pumps by natural or man-made boundaries, structures , or other f'eatures which offset or limit the necessity for such rninimurn distance requirements. The BZA's decision to waive part or all ofthe distance requirements shall be ba.sed upon thc lbllorling factors: Whether the nature and type ofnatural or man-made boundary, structure, or other featurc lying between the proposed establishment and an existing facilitl with fuer pumps is detemrined by the BZA to lessen lhe impact ofthe proposed facility with fuel pumps . Such boundary, structure , or other feature may rnclude, but is not B. 2. 1. Whether the granting of the distance waiver will have an adverse impact on adjacent land uses, especially residential land uses. 1.l The Adrninistrative Code shall establish the subrnittal requirements for a facility with fuel pumps waiver request. The request lor a facility with fuel pumps waiver shall be based on the subnrittal of the required application, a site plan. and a written market study analysis rvhich.justifies a need for the additional facility with fuel pumps in lhe desired location. Additional condilions.'l'hc BZA shall have the right to add additional conditions or requirements to its approval of a distance waiver request in order to insure compatibility ol the facility rnith fuel pumps uith the surrounding area and the goals and objectives ofthe GMP. Building architecture, site design, lighting, and signage requirements. 1. Building architecture shall rneet the requirements ofLDC scctior -5.05.08 in addition to the following requirements: a. All structures on-site shall be of a consistent design and color scheme. b. Canopy standards: i. Columns must be at least eighteen (18) inches wide on all sides. ii. Under-canopy lighls must be fully recessed. lll Canopies must not be higher than sixteen (16) feet clear. c ll lll lv t\ lilniled to. iakes. :narshcs. nondcvelopable netlands, dcsignalcd preserve areas. ca:rals, arrd a rninirnuur o1'a 4-lanc arterial or collector right-of-lvay . Whcther the facility with fuel pumps is only engaged in the servicing of automobiles during regular. daytime business hours, or, ilin addition 1o or in lieu ofser-vicing. the facilitv u ith fuel pumps sells lbod, gasoline, and other conr.enience items during daytin.re, nighttimc, or on a 24 hour basis. Whether the facilit.r'- rvith fuel pumps is located within a shopping center prirnarily accesscd by a drivervay , or if it fronts on and is acccsscd directly frorn a platted road right-of-u a1 . Canopy standards. a) Canopy rools shall be consistent with the architectural design and leatures of the principal structure . b) The eave lascia olthe canopy shall be ofone (1) color, consistent witll the prcdominant color and scheme of the principal structure. Color accent banding C c) on canopy structures is peflnitted through the Deviations and Altemative Compliance proces s established in LDC scction -i.t)5.0E One of the following shall be applied to the canopy roof or eave fascia: i) Canopy roofs shall provide a slope ratio of 4: I 2 or higher. A rninimurn of two roof-edge or parapct line changes are required and shall create three distinct sections. One roof edge or parapet line change shall be provided for every 75 linear feet of the canopy length. Each change shall be a minimum of20 percent of the canopy length. ii) The eave fascia shall have a projection or recess with a minimum depth of three feet, and a minimum total width of 20 percent of the eave fascia length. One change is required for every 75 linear feet of the canopy length. See canopy signage standards in LDC-lcriqr 5.1)5.0-5 C.4;, below Site design standards. a A dumpster enclosure shall be provided as established in LDC se11i911.1Qi. Q! and irtegrated with the design and color scheme rr1'the facilit], with fuel pumps Trash receptacle(s) shall be provided at a convenient location on-site to facilitate litter control. All restrooms and A l Ms shall bc locatcd inside the principal structure Lighting standards All light Iixtures shall be dilccted away liom neighboring properties. On-site light fixtures shall not exceed a height greater than twenty (20) feet above finished grade. On-site luminaries shall be of low level, indirect diffuse type, and shall be between a minimum average of I .5 foot-candles and a maximum average of 5 foot-candles. b. 3 All light fixtures shall be full cutoff with flat lenses. Lighting located undemeath the canopy shall be recessed, of indirect diffuse type, and designed to provide light only to the purnp island areas located undemeath said canopy 4. Under-canopy lurninance shall be between a minimum average of 5 foot-candres and a maximum average of 20 foot-candles. 2. a. b. c. d. c. f. Signagc for facilities with fuel pumps. The lollowing are the only signs allowed in facilities with fuel pumps and convenience stores with fuel pumps. a. Window, Wall, and othcr signs: As allowed in [-DC,se ctiqr.5.0{..!!. b. An illuminated corporate logo with a maximum area of l2 square feet shall be allowed on a canopy face which is adjacent to a dedicated street or highway. Otherwise accent lighting and back lighting are prohibited on canopy structurcs. Color accent banding on canopies rnay be approved as established in LDC sqctiru 5.05.()5 C.l.b.iv.(b), above. One ground sign shall be pennitted for each site and shall be placed within a 200 square foot landscaped area. Height is limited so that the top edge of the sign face is less than eight feet above grade. Maximum permitted area 60 square feet. Said sign shall be consistent with the color scheme and architectural design of the principal structure. Signage is prohibited above fuel pumps Supplemental standards for facilities rvith fuel pumps within 250 feet ofresidential property. Facilities with fuel pumps shall be subject to the following standards when located within 250 feet of residentially zoned or residentially developed properties, hereinafter rel'erred to as "residential property," as measured from the property line ol the facilit"v rvith fuel pumps to the residential property line. However, a facility with fuel pumps shall be exempt from LDC scctjon -i.0-5.05 D when it is separated from residential property by a minimum of 100 feet ofdesignated preserve area that is 80 percent opaque and at least 12 feet in height within one year, or a minirnum 4lane arterial or collector right-of-way . L Setbacks. All structures shall provide a rrinimum 50-loot front, side, and rcar yard setback from residential property line(s). 2. Landscaping and masonry wall standards. a. Facility with fuel pumps sites shall be separated lrom residential property by a thirty (30) loot wide landscape buffer and an architecturally dcsigned rnasonry wall.'l'he masonry wall shall be eight (8) I'eet in height, centered within the landscape buffer, and shall use rnaterials similar in color. pattern, and texture to those utilized for the principal structur€. The masonry wall shall be located on top of a bcrm. 'l'he berm shall be constructed and rnaintained at a height of lhree (3) 1'eet and a tnaximum slope of 3:1 . The berm shall be planted with ground cover. b. I-andscaping shall be required on both sides of the masonry wall. On the residential property wall side, a hedgerorv consisting of # l0 shrubs, spaced three (3) leet on center, ald four (l) feet high at plantirg and tive (5) f'eet high within one year shall be provided. ttr addition, a rorv of canopy trees spaccd thirty (30) feet on center' and ten (10) leet in height at planting are required. On the fatility rvith fuel pumps wall side, a row of canopy trees, spaced thirty (30) feet on celtter, and twelve ( l2) feet in height at planting are required. A hedgerow consisring of#10 shrubs, spaced three (3) leet on ccnter, and four (4) feet high at plantingandtivc(5)fecthighwithinoneycarshallbeprovidcd.Requiredcanopytrees shall be staggered to accomnodate the canopy trees on the residential property wall side. d t) b e Music, aniplified sound, and delivery time standards Music and arnplified sound shall not be played in the fuel pump area between the hours of l0:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.rr. Music and amplilied sound shall not bc audible frorr the residential property line Deliveries shall be prohibited betrveen the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in the area located between thc neighborirrg residential property and the facility with fuel pumps . a. On-site lighting. On-site light fixtures within filty (50) fect ofresidential property shall not exceed a height greater than fifteen ( l5) feet above finished grade . Light fixtures elsewhere shall not exceed a height greater than twenty (20) feet above finished grade. 111 AII light fixtures shall be full cutoff with flat lenses a b 1V. ll. 4 Lighting standarcls. On-site luminaries sha1l be of low levcl, indirect diffuse type, and shall be between a minimum average of I .5 foot-candles and a maximum average of 5 foot-candles. Illumination shall not exceed: a) 0.5 foot-candles at ali residentiai property lines; and b) 0.2 foot-candles at ten (10) l'cet beyond all lesidential property lines Under-canopy lighting Lighting located underneath the canopy shall be recessed, of indirect diffuse t1pe, and designed to provide light only to the pump island areas located underneath said canopy. 6 Under canopy lurlinance shall be between a minimum average of 5 foot-candles and a maxirnum average of 20 foot-candles. Dumpster enclosures. At a minimum, the dumpster enclosure shall be located at a distance from residential property equal to the setback of the principal structur€ frorn residential property. See LDC _s,-c'c,tjq,-5.05.11 for car washes, vacuums, and cornpressed air stations abutting residential zoning districts. 5. A11 light fixtures shall be directed away from neighboring properties. l The following landscape requirernents are in addition to the requirements of s_c,91111{()tl.0fJ Landscaping and Buff'ering. 1. R ight-of-!r al bu[[er landscaping : a. Landscaping adjacent to rights-of-E'ay sxternal to Ihe devclopment ploject shall be located within a landscape buffer easement which is a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet in width. Water management swales shall not be located within these buffer areas; however, water rnanagement facilities such as underground piping shall be pcnnitted. b. An undulating berm with a maximurn slope of 3: I shall be constmcted along the entire length of the landscape buffer . The berm shall be constructed and maintained at a minimum average height of three (3) feet. Thc berm shall bc planted with ground cover (other than grass), shrubs. hedges, trees, and pahns. e. The required trees and palms shall be clustered in double rows with a rninimum of three (3) trees per cluster. Canopy hees shall be planted a maximum of rwenty (20) feet on center within a cluster. The use of palms within the right-of-way buffer shall be Iirnited to landscaped areas adjacent to vehicular access points. Palms shall be planted in staggered heights, a nrinimum of three (3) pahns per cluster, spaced at a maximunr of cight (8) feet on center, with a minimum of a four (l) foot dilference in height between each tree. Exceptions will be rnade for Roystonea spp. and Phoenix spp. (not including roebelenii) which [ray be planted one (I ) palm per cluster. A maximum distance oftwenty-five (25) feet between all types of tree clusters shall be rnaintained (See Illustration 1 below). All ofthe trees shall be a rninimum oflburteen ( l4) l'cct in heighl at the tirne ofinstallation Trees shall have a minimum ola three and oneJralf(32) inch caliper at twelve (12) inches above the ground and a six (6) foot spread. At installation, shrubs shall be a rninirnurn ol ten ( l0) gallons, five (5) feet in height, with a three (3) foot spread, planted lbur (4) feet on center. a. Landscaping adjacent to all other propcrly lincs Landscaping adjacent to all other property lines shall cornply u,ith the requirernents in l,DC scctiru ./.()6.01. Curbing shall bc installed and constructed, consistent with rninimum code recluirelnents, beru,een all pave(l areas and landscape areas. b E. d. 2. !l=LUSTRAlrol.r 1 11!l TREE ITYP-) rl * I CANOPY :. iq 3:l AERM @ 3' HT 10' MIN ooustE Row @ 20' MAx OISTANCE 6ETWEEI{ TREES EDGE DISTANCE BETWEEN CLUSTERS -:r SPACING BETWEEN BUFFER 20 SHRUA & GROUND COVEF EOGE MIN. 3 PALMS PER CLUSTERAT PAVEMENT ENIFANCES PnfPAREO gY, OFFICEcoxevrrY DcvEroPxaxr ^r{) I I ,..u- BUILDIN G (; lustration I . Facilities with Fuel Pumps R.O.W. I-andscape Requirements Storage tanks shall be located below grade. I'here shall be no outside displays of products, stacking ol tires, or other merchandise. I 25' wtDE I SPACING BETWEEN TREES rl J No facility rr ith fuel pumps shall have arl entrance or exit for vehicles within 200 feet along the sarne side ol a street as a school, public playglound, child care center, church , hospital, public library, or any institution for depcndenls or for children, except where such property is in another block . Each facilitl tith fuel pumps shall provide the necessary infrastructure and pre-wiring in order to providc thc capabilities lbr gencrator sen,ice in case olemergencies. In addition to the retail dispensing of autornobile fuels and oil, only the following services may be rendered and sales made, exccpt as indicated: l. Sales and servicing of spark plugs, batteries, distributors, and distributor parts. 2. Sales, mounting, balancing. and repair of tires and wheel alignrnents, but not recapping of tires Provision of water, antifreeze, flushing of the cooling system, air conditioning recharge, and the like. Providing and repairing fuel purnps and lines Minor motor adlustmerlts not involving removal of the head or crankcase Sales of coltl drinks. candies, tobacco, and sirnilar convenience goods for custorners. Provision ol road rnaps and othcr inlonration. l0 No nechanical work shall be allowed outside of the enclosed areas l 4 ..\ S 9 ll )2 Oil drainagc prts or appliances lor such purpose or repair purposes shall be locatcd within a wholly enclosed building. Uses pennissible at a facility with fuel pumps do not include rnajor mechanical and body work, straightening of frarnes or body parts, stean cleaning, painting, welding, storage of automobiles (except as expressly pennitted in subsection 13. below), commercial garage as an accessory use, or other work involving undue noise, glare, futnes, smoke, or other characteristics 10 an cxtent greater than nomrally lbund in such stations. A facility with fuel pumps is not a facility for the sale ol'autorrobile vehicles, a repair garage, a body shop, or a truck stop. The ternporary storage of vehiclcs shall be pennitted if the vehicles are to be seryiced at the facilitl with fuel pumps or if the vehicles have been towed by the facility tith fuel pumps and are being hcld tbr servicing, for an insurance company, or for salvage Any such vehicle(s), other I, Sales and replacement of water hoses, fan belts, brake fluid, light bulbs, fuses, floor mats, wiper blades, grease rctainers, wheel bearings, shock absorbcrs, mirrors, exhaust systerns, and the like. Greasing and lubrication. 13. than those vehicles serviced daily, shall bc stored within an area surrounded by an opaque I'cncc not less than six (6) feet high. Said vehicles shall not be stored longer than sixty (60) days. 14 Washing and polishing ofautourobiles and sale olautomobile washing and polishiug materials, but this only allows auto detailing as an accessory use . This provision does not allow carwashes except in those zoning districts where a carwash is a pennitted use, and where such carwashes shall be subiect to criteria specified in the zoning district. K. Exceptions: l. The site design standards set forth in LDC_ig,jrf_a]f 5.1[.0] B.l. (table) shall not apply to, nor render non-conforming, any existing facility with fuel pumps or any facility with fuel pumps within a PUD in which a specific architectural rendering and site plan was approved as part of a rezoning action prior to July 5, 1998. 2. The site design standards set forth in LDC section 5.05.05 C. - J. or any other applicable development standard shall apply to existing facilities with fuel pumps pursuant to the provisions ol![.Q! Nonconfonnities, and all other applicable sections of the Land Development Code. (Ord. No.09-43, $ 3.A;Ord. No. l0-23, $ 3.JJ;Ord. No. 13-56, d 3.S; Ord. No. l5-46, g 2.B) 5.05.06 - Private Airports Parcel Info & Location Map 1) Parcel ID: 61834720003 Address: 2891 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: N G + T C L F NO 2 11 50 25 COMM NE CNR OF LOT 36, S 1510.20FT, W 5FT TO POB, W 137.85FT, S 92.07FT, SE ALONG N LINE OF TRAIL 149.96FT, N 38 DEG E ALG CURVE TO LEFT 33.96FT, N 160.13FT TO POB, LESS STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING CASE NO. 95-1010-CA OR 2403 PG 2369 Owner: SHADOWLAWN DEVELOPMENT 1 TRUST c/o INTERSTATE PROPERTIES 999 Broadway, Suite 400 Saugus, MA 01906-4510 2) Parcel ID: 61834680004 Address: 2887 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: N G + T C L F #2 FROM THE NE CNR OF LOT 36, N G T C L F #2 S 1237.70FT, S 89 DEG W 5 FT TO POB, S 272.44FT, S 89 DEG W 138.05FT, S 103.62FT, N 51 DEG W 73.21FT, N 329.70FT, N 89 DEG E 196FT TO POB, LESS STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING CASE NO. 95-1302-CA Owner: PALUMBO TR, ROSEMARIE D d/b/a SHADOWLAWN DEVELOPMENT 1 TRUST c/o INTERSTATE PROPERTIES 999 Broadway, Suite 400 Saugus, MA 01906-4510 3) Parcel ID: 26780080007 Address: 2795 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: COL-LEE-CO COURT BEG AT SE COR OF LOT-THENCE WITH NE R/W LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL N 51 DEG 58 MIN W 200FT, N 38 DEG 02 MIN E 125FT, N 75 DEG 46 MIN E 20FT, S 49 DEG 49MIN E 80FT TO E LINE LOT 1, S 175FT TO POB LESS ORDER OF TAKING CASE # 94-1749CA PARCEL 127 DESC IN OR 2403 PG 2376 Owner: GUTIERREZ, JAIME A 779 Nottingham Drive Naples, FL 34109-1641 4) Parcel ID: 26780040005 (PART OF) Address: 2757 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: COL-LEE-CO COURT LOTS 1 + 2, BEG SW CNR LOT 35 NG&TCLR #2, SELY ALG R/W TAMIAMI TRL 180FT, NLY 200FT, NWLY 180FT TO PT W LINE LOT 35, SLY 200FT POB LESS R/W & LESS OR 1157 PG 1403, LESS ORDER OF TAKING CASE #95 -764-CA PAR NO 126 Owner: ABC PROPERTIES LTD P.O. BOX 593688 Orlando, FL 32859-3688 NOV2017 DEL LAGO VENTURES, INC. SHAREHOLDER LIST 1. RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc. RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. SHAREHOLDER LIST 1. Carl Bolch Senior Trust 2. Carl E. Bolch, Jr. GRAT Dated 12/23/2011 3. Susan Bass Bolch GRAT Dated 12/23/2011 4. Moran, Allison Bolch 5. Bolch, Jordan Bass 6. Isbill, Melanie Bolch 7. Morhous, Natalie Bolch 8. Lenker, Max 9. Dumbacher, Robert J. 10. Milam, Bill 11. Akers, Joseph H. 12. Eggers, Shirley B. 13. McBrayer, Max E., Jr. 14. Reese, Mark A. 15. Ahlert, Karla 16. Alexander, Will 17. Gilmore, J 18. Benton, Kelly Walker 19. Posener, Robby 20. Woodward, Whitney 21. Thornton, Brian 22. Siccardi, Jr., Arthur J. 1 Sarah McGowan From:Kurt Adams Sent:Thursday, November 30, 2017 3:15 PM To:Sarah McGowan Subject:FW: 2795 Tamiami Tr Sarah – This is what we’ve got. Will this work from Jaime? He owns this as an individual. Kurt Adams | Senior Real Estate Representative RaceTrac | racetrac.com | 200 Galleria Parkway SE, Suite 900, Atlanta GA 30339 o 770.431.7600 x1008 c 615.477.2816 f 678.305.7543 From: Craig D Timmins [mailto:Craig@ipcnaples.com] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 1:20 PM To: Kurt Adams Subject: FW: 2795 Tamiami Tr Kurt, please see the email below from Jaime Gutierrez. Craig D. Timmins, CCIM Principal Investment Properties Corporation of Naples 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 402 Naples, Florida 34103-3586 tel 239.261.3400 x161 fax 239.261.7579 craig@ipcnaples.com www.ipcnaples.com Licensed Real Estate Broker CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email transmission (and/or the attachments accompanying it) may contain privileged and confidential information, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply email and destroy the original message. Thank you. LIABILITY DISCLAIMER: Buyers, Sellers, Landlords and Tenants must all conduct proper due-diligence when buying, selling or leasing commercial property. Due diligence should include, but not be limited to, matters involving zoning, permitting, environmental and all other regulatory matters, plus financial underwriting of participating parties including research associated with bankruptcy, foreclosure and financial capability. Neither IPC nor its employees, agents or staff perform appraisals or provide services of an appraiser. Additionally, parties should obtain tax and legal advice. IPC does not represent or warrant these matters nor is it responsible for the statements of third parties. From: Jaime Gutierrez [mailto:jaime58gu@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 12:09 PM To: Craig D Timmins Subject: Re: 2795 Tamiami Tr To whom it may concern 2 The purpose of this email is to confirm that I am the sole owner of the property located at 2795 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL, with the following property ID#: 26780080007. Jaime Gutierrez COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. F orms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) T DR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) 1 SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # Gas Station Distance Waiver COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2 Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Project Description & Location Map 1)Parcel ID:61834720003 Address:2891 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: N G + T C L F NO 2 11 50 25 COMM NE CNR OF LOT 36, S 1510.20FT, W 5FT TO POB, W 137.85FT, S 92.07FT, SE ALONG N LINE OF TRAIL 149.96FT, N 38 DEG E ALG CURVE TO LEFT 33.96FT, N 160.13FT TO POB, LESS STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING CASE NO. 95-1010-CA OR 2403 PG 2369 2)Parcel ID:61834680004 Address:2887 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: N G + T C L F #2 FROM THE NE CNR OF LOT 36, N G T C L F #2 S 1237.70FT, S 89 DEG W 5 FT TO POB, S 272.44FT, S 89 DEG W 138.05FT, S 103.62FT, N 51 DEG W 73.21FT, N 329.70FT, N 89 DEG E 196FT TO POB, LESS STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING CASE NO. 95-1302-CA 3)Parcel ID:26780080007 Address:2795 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: COL-LEE-CO COURT BEG AT SE COR OF LOT-THENCE WITH NE R/W LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL N 51 DEG 58 MIN W 200FT, N 38 DEG 02 MIN E 125FT, N 75 DEG 46 MIN E 20FT, S 49 DEG 49MIN E 80FT TO E LINE LOT 1, S 175FT TO POB LESS ORDER OF TAKING CASE # 94-1749CA PARCEL 127 DESC IN OR 2403 PG 2376 4)Parcel ID:26780040005 (PART OF) Address:2757 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: COL-LEE-CO COURT LOTS 1 + 2, BEG SW CNR LOT 35 NG&TCLR #2, SELY ALG R/W TAMIAMI TRL 180FT, NLY 200FT, NWLY 180FT TO PT W LINE LOT 35, SLY 200FT POB LESS R/W & LESS OR 1157 PG 1403, LESS ORDER OF TAKING CASE #95-764-CA PAR NO 126 From:ReischlFred To:Richard Yovanovich; Dianna Quintanilla; John Wojdak Subject:FW: Racetrack Proposal Shadowlawn and US 41 Date:Monday, February 12, 2018 8:59:53 AM FYI   Respectfully, Fred Reischl Fred Reischl, AICP New email as of 12/9/2017: fred.reischl@colliercountyfl.gov Zoning Division Growth Management Department “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT” 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 239-252-4211   From: StrainMark  Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 7:15 AM To: ReischlFred <Fred.Reischl@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Racetrack Proposal Shadowlawn and US 41   Please process as typical.   Mark   239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.   From: janeking2008 [mailto:jdkingii@comcast.net]  Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2018 12:21 PM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: TaylorPenny <Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov>; FialaDonna <Donna.Fiala@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Racetrack Proposal Shadowlawn and US 41   Good Day Mr. Strain; Please accept this email as my objection to the request by the Racetrack Corporation to build a new facility at the corner of Shadowlawn and US 41. My objection is based on the following opinions. First, there are already three gas station/convenience stores on US 41 from Davis to Courthouse Shadows. So the need is not there. In fact the petitioner is asking for a variance due to being within 500 feet of an existing gas station. They know that the code does not allow for this and must have their request granted. If the county has codes for something why can a corporation come in and have existing codes changed just to satisfy their needs? I for one am tired of this happening all the time it seems. There was a reason these codes were enacted in the first place. Also the intersection in question is already very busy. It is not a straight crossing but diagonal. Already there are no turns on red lights due to safety concerns. We also have some of the highest pedestrian traffic in the area with quite a few not abiding by the designated crossing areas. This is both day and night, to include very early mornings as these individuals go to work. With the increased traffic, both automotive and pedestrian I believe this will be a major safety issue that can be avoided. Just down the street is Shadowlawn Elementary School which also has a high amount of foot traffic. Once again what about the safety of the children in the area. The intersection also has a very high traffic flow, with quite a few cars coming down Shadowlawn. Try coming out of the existing CVS Pharmacy during certain high times of the day and you will see. Even if Racetrack changes their entrances and exits to the rear of the proposed property most of the traffic will go to Shadowlawn for the traffic light. With the confusing legal description in the Naples News, I really do not know what other variances the petitioner is requesting, but then I go back to the codes and zoning. If none of these items that are on the counties books don't matter, why are they there? I know you will be having a hearing on February 22nd, but due to prior commitments I will be in Tallahassee dealing with some legislative issues. So that is the reason I am sending this email. As a 52 year resident of this area with the last 22 years living off Bayshore I am very aware of our area and the needs. Racetrack is not one of them. Thank you for taking the time to read my email and I hope that some consideration will be given. Sincerely James D. King 3308 Captains Cove Naples, Florida 34112 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PETITION FOR WAIVER FROM SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS LDC subsection 5.05.05 B & Code of Laws section 2-83 – 2-90 Chapter 6 G. of the Administrative Code PETITION NO (PL) PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ____________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Owner(s): ___________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ____________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: _______________________Section/Township/Range: / / Subdivision: _____________________________________ Unit: ______Lot: ______ Block: ______ Metes & Bounds Description: _______________________________________________________ Address/general location of subject property: __________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. To be completed by staff 6/3/2014 Page 1 of 4 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ZONING INFORMATION Current Zoning of subject property: _____________________________________________ Adjacent property information: Zoning Land Use N S E W WAIVER REQUEST DETAIL Please address the following waiver request details on an attached separate sheet: 1.What is the extent of the waiver being requested (in linear feet) from the required 500 foot separation? (NOTE: This measurement is the shortest distance between the nearest points of any two lots occupied by an Automobile Service Station, or for which a building permit has been issued.) 2.The Office of the Hearing Examiner may grant a waiver for part or all of the minimum separation requirements set forth in LDC subsection 5.05.05 B, if it is demonstrated by the applicant and determined by the Office of the Hearing Examiner that the site proposed for development of an Automobile Service Station is separated from another Automobile Service Station by natural or man- made boundaries, structures or other features which offset of limit the necessity for such minimum distance requirements. Staff’s analysis and subsequent recommendation, and the Office of the Hearing Examiner’s determination, are based on the following criteria as provided by LDC section 5.05.05 B. Please provide a narrative, on a separate sheet attached to this application, describing how the waiver complies with the criteria listed below to the extent you wish as it pertains to the proposed use. a.Describe the nature and type of natural or man-made boundary, structure, or other feature lying between the proposed establishment and an existing Automobile Service Station which may, as determined by the reviewing body, lessen the impact of the proposed service station. Such boundary, structure, or other feature may include, but is not limited to, lakes, marshes, nondevelopable wetlands, designated preserve areas, canals, and a minimum of a four-lane arterial or collector right-of-way. b.Whether or not the Automobile Service Station is only engaged in the servicing of automobiles during regular, daytime business hours, or if in addition to or in lieu of servicing, the station sells food, gasoline and other convenience items during daytime, nighttime, or on a 24-hour basis. c.Whether the Automobile Service Station is located within a shopping center primarily accessed by a driveway or if it fronts on and is accessed directly from a platted road right-of-way. d.Whether or not the granting of the distance wavier will have an adverse impact on adjacent land uses especially residential land uses. 6/3/2014 Page 2 of 4 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Waiver from Separation Requirements for Automobile Service Stations Chapter 6 G. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download from website for current form) Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Pre-Application meeting notes Conceptual Site Plan 24 in. x 36 in., along with one reduced copy 8 ½ in. x 11in. Warranty Deed 2 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Environmental Data Requirements, if required 3 Aerial photographs 5 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 Letter of no objection from the United States Postal Service. Contact Robert M. Skebe at (239) 435-2122. 1 Written Market Study Analysis *If located in the Bayshore/Gateway triangle Redevelopment Area, include an additional set of each submittal requirement ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: •Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. •Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 4 RACETRAC AT SHADOWLAWN AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION WAIVER, PURPOSE, AND INTENT Introduction: This application is for a Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment for the proposed RaceTrac convenience store with gasoline sales station located on the northwest corner of Shadowlawn Drive and US 41 in Naples, Florida. The request is for several deviations from the Land Development Code to accommodate redevelopment of several existing and vacant uses. The proposed RaceTrac property is an assemblage of four properties including the vacant service station on the corner of Shadowlawn and US 41, the existing office building adjacent to the northeast fronting Shadowlawn, the existing service station to the northwest fronting US 41 and a portion of the existing ABC property. The properties, owners, and folio numbers are identified on the attached Parcel Info & Location Map. The proposed RaceTrac at Shadowlawn, is zoned C-4, and is located in the Gateway Triangle Mixed Use Overlay District in an area of existing development and infrastructure to support commercial uses. Immediately adjacent to the property is the ABC Liquor property to the northwest and Naples Outfitters (outdoor/watersports retailer) to the northeast. Across Shadowlawn is the existing CVS Pharmacy on the corner of US 41 and existing residential properties to the north. Across US 41 is the Gulfgate Plaza retail center with a fast food (Wendy’s) outparcel and a former gas station on the hard corner of US 41 which was demolished around 2006. On the far corner opposite the proposed RaceTrac is an existing Kangaroo gas station. The distance to this existing gas station is approximately 315 feet, and therefore a waiver from the distance requirements is LDC 5.05.05.B.1. is being applied for. The existing adjacent uses and the distance to the existing gas station are shown on the attached Aerial/Adjacent Uses exhibit. This Waiver application presents how the proposed redevelopment meets the four (4) requirements in LDC Section 5.05.05.B.2.a, including enhancements proposed with the proposed development to address compatibility with the surrounding uses. Automobile Service Station Justifications for Section 5.05.05.B.2.a A facility with fuel pumps is a permitted use in the C-4 Zoning district and GTMUD Overlay per the zoning section of the Land Development Code, 2.03.07.N.4. Although the use is a permitted use, the LDC has specific design requirements for facilities with fuel pumps as described in LDC Section 5.05.05.B. Specifically, facilities with fuel pumps must provide a minimum separation of 500-feet from adjacent facilities with fuel pumps. Section 5.05.05.B of the LDC also provides four (4) criteria for the Hearing Examiner to consider for granting a waiver from the separation requirement. A brief description of how the proposed redevelopment satisfies the four (4) waiver criteria from Section 5.05.05.B.2.a of the LDC is presented below. i. Whether the nature and type of natural or man-made boundary, structure, or other feature lying between the proposed establishment and an existing facility with fuel pumps is determined by the BZA to lessen the impact of the proposed facility with fuel pumps. Such boundary, structure, or other feature may include, but is not limited to, lakes, marshes, non-developable wetlands, designated preserve areas, canals, and a minimum of a 4- lane arterial or collector right-of-way. The existing 6-lane divided Tamiami Trail East right-of-way lies between the proposed RaceTrac and the existing Kangaroo gas station. The RaceTrac and Kangaroo sites are on opposite corners of the US 41/Shadowlawn Drive intersection, over 300 feet apart. Being on opposite corners, as a convenience use, the site serves opposite travelers on opposite sides of US 41. The median and major intersection is a barrier between the sites. ii. Whether the facility with fuel pumps is only engaged in the servicing of automobiles during regular, daytime business hours, or, if in addition to or in lieu of servicing, the facility with fuel pumps sells food, gasoline, and other convenience items during daytime, nighttime, or on a 24 hour basis. Although gasoline sales are a significant source of RaceTrac’s business, they offer a wide variety of in-store services including their coffee bar, frozen yogurt station, prepared hot food, and made to order food options. In addition to these offerings, they have indoor and outdoor dining areas for patrons to use with free wi-fi and electronic device charging outlets. These dining areas are a unique feature to RaceTrac that are not available at the existing Kangaroo across Tamiami Trail which only offers fuel and general convenience items. In order to RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Automobile Service Station Waiver Narrative - 2 - provide adequate service to the public, their operation will be 24-hours. It should be noted that RaceTrac does not offer automobile services such as repairs, oil changes, car washes, etc. iii. Whether the facility with fuel pumps is located within a shopping center primarily accessed by a driveway, or if it fronts on and is accessed directly from a platted road right-of-way. Access to the proposed RaceTrac will be from the adjacent rights-of- way. The project proposes a full access at the northern driveway on and a right-in/right-out driveway on Shadowlawn. A northbound left turn lane is proposed for the full access driveway. An additional access on US 41 is also proposed as a right-in/right-out driveway. This driveway consolidates four existing driveways that access the property in its current condition and is located as far from the Shadowlawn intersection as possible. In addition to these driveway improvements, an interconnect with the existing ABC property will be provided, allowing that property access to Shadowlawn, improving flow, and reducing conflicts on US 41. iv. Whether the granting of the distance waiver will have an adverse impact on adjacent land uses, especially residential land uses. For this criterion, RaceTrac gave careful consideration to their site layout, lighting, outdoor speakers, perimeter buffers, number of fueling positions, and the fuel canopy height. As previously described, the residential properties are located to the north, on the east side of Shadowlawn behind the existing CVS Pharmacy. The RaceTrac is site is oriented fronting US 41, with fueling, vehicular areas, etc. shielded for the residential area by the building. The existing property includes two automobile service stations, one of which is operational. This business has open garage doors, stored broken down cars etc. The existing office use has parking adjacent to the Shadowlawn right-of-way, with minimal buffering, directly across from the existing residential area. RaceTrac has located its fueling area and heavier traffic areas as far as possible from the existing residential properties. Market Analysis: A market analysis supporting this Facility with Fuel Pumps Waiver application will be submitted under separate cover. LDC 5.05.05.D provides for Supplemental Standards for Facilities with Fuel Pumps located within 250 feet of residential properties: RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Automobile Service Station Waiver Narrative - 3 - The supplemental standards are listed below with a description of the proposed RaceTrac design features addressing the requirement. 1. All structures shall provide a minimum 50-foot front, side, and rear yard setback from residential property line(s). The RaceTrac does not directly abut the residential properties, which are across Shadowlawn Drive, a 60 foot right-of-way. 2. Landscaping and masonry wall standards. This criterion is not applicable. The RaceTrac does not directly abut the residential properties, which are across Shadowlawn Drive a 60 foot right-of-way. 3. Music, amplified sound, and delivery time standards. a. Music and amplified sound shall not be played in the fuel pump area between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. RaceTrac will comply with this criterion. b. Music and amplified sound shall not be audible from the residential property line. RaceTrac will comply with this criterion. As noted previously, the fueling area is adjacent to US 41 and shielded from the residential area by the proposed building. c. Deliveries shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in the area located between the neighboring residential property and the facility with fuel pumps. RaceTrac will comply with this criterion. 4. Lighting standards. a. On-site lighting. i. All light fixtures shall be directed away from neighboring properties. RaceTrac will comply with this criterion. ii. On-site light fixtures within fifty (50) feet of residential property shall not exceed a height greater than fifteen (15) feet above finished grade. Light fixtures elsewhere shall not exceed a height greater than twenty (20) feet above finished grade. This criterion is not applicable. The RaceTrac does not directly abut the residential properties, which are across Shadowlawn Drive, a 60 foot right-of-way. RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Automobile Service Station Waiver Narrative - 4 - iii. All light fixtures shall be full cutoff with flat lenses. RaceTrac will comply with this criterion. iv. On-site luminaries shall be of low level, indirect diffuse type, and shall be between a minimum average of 1.5 foot-candles and a maximum average of 5 foot-candles. RaceTrac will comply with this criterion. v. Illumination shall not exceed: a) 0.5 foot-candles at all residential property lines; and RaceTrac will comply with this criterion. b) 0.2 foot-candles at ten (10) feet beyond all residential property lines. RaceTrac will comply with this criterion. b. Under-canopy lighting. i. Lighting located underneath the canopy shall be recessed, of indirect diffuse type, and designed to provide light only to the pump island areas located underneath said canopy. RaceTrac will comply with this criterion. ii. Under canopy luminance shall be between a minimum average of 5 foot-candles and a maximum average of 20 foot-candles. RaceTrac will comply with this criterion. 5. Dumpster enclosures. At a minimum, the dumpster enclosure shall be located at a distance from residential property equal to the setback of the principal structure from residential property. This criterion is met. 6. See LDC section 5.05.11 for car washes, vacuums, and compressed air stations abutting residential zoning districts. No car wash is proposed. A vacuum and air station will be located on the outer edge of the fueling area, adjacent to US 41. Therefore, it does comply with this item. RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Automobile Service Station Waiver Narrative - 5 - Summary: As detailed in Section 5.05.05 of the Land Development Code, the attached application demonstrates the following: 1. The proposed use is a permitted use in the C-4 zoning district. 2. The existing gas station across the street is separated from the proposed RaceTrac by a 6-lane arterial right-of-way with a raised median. 3. The proposed RaceTrac offers convenience store services that are unique to the area. 4. The Site Plans have been prepared to minimize vehicular traffic near the residential properties and to buffer noise and lighting. 5. The fuel canopy is proposed to have a maximum of 16’ of clear height under the canopy. 6. The proposed lighting plan will follow the International Dark-Sky Association’s statement on outdoor lighting. This is a betterment plan for the parcel. Based on compliance with these and other regulations, the applicant respectfully contends that this Facility with Fuel Pumps Waiver application will not negatively impact adjacent land uses. Similarly, the proposed use is appropriate at the subject location, and is compatible with the surrounding area. For these reasons, the requested Facility with Fuel Pumps Waiver should be approved. RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Automobile Service Station Waiver Narrative - 6 - STATE ROAD 45 (U.S. 41) TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST AUT O SER VI C E (VAC A N T) SHADOWLAWN DR IVE RETAIL PHARMACYAUTO SERVICE OFFICE PRO P O S E D RAC E T R A C PRO P E R T Y BOU N D A R Y BAYSIDE STREET LOI S S T R E E T PINELAND STREET FAST FOOD GASSTATIONGULF GATE PLAZA RESIDENTIAL VACANT (FORMER GAS STATION, DEMOLISHED 2007 +/-) 315' + / - OFFI C E PLAN REVISIONSDATEDESCRIPTIONTownship: County, State: Part of Section(s): Project Number: Status: Sheet Number: Drawn By: Checked By: Project Manager: FOR SUBMITTAL PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT VALID WITHOUT SEAL, SIGNATURE AND DATE.1605 Hendry StreetFort Myers, FL 33901239-418-0691 239-418-0692 faxFlorida Certificate of Authorization:Engineering LB #: 26978JTW KLS JTW 21442 25 E COLLIER COUNTY, FLPlanning - Engineering - Project Management11 Range:50 SPROJECT:OWNER / DEVELOPER:9/20/2017 1:21 PMK:\21442 - RACETRAC @ SHADOWLAWN DR\EXHIBITS\AERIAL AND ADJACENT USES EXHIBIT\21442-01-AERIAL-AND-ADJACENT-USES-EXHIBIT.DWG#3225 CUMBERLAND BLVD. SUITE 100ATLANTA, GA 30339(770) 431-7600RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC.SHADOWLAWN DRIVE(EPN #1226 - STORE #XXXX)NEWS1000 50 200 AERIAL & ADJACENT USES EXHIBIT 1 February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL MARKET STUDY FOR RACETRAC CONVENIENCE AND GAS FACILITY Shadowlawn Dr and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 2 CONTACT INFORMATION This market analysis was prepared by Meyers Research,a market research and consulting firm specializing in the real estate industry.It has been commissioned by RaceTrac. Michael J Timmerman,CRE,Senior Vice President,served as Project Director and oversaw all aspects of this assignment.Follow- up questions should be directed to Michael J.Timmerman at 239-269-0769 or mtimmerman@meyersllc.com. OBJECTIVE The objective of this analysis is to assess the market-based opportunity for a RaceTrac Convenience and Gas Station facility on the northwest corner of Shadowlawn Dr and Tamiami Trail in Naples, Collier County, FL.Collier County, FL requires a market study be performed before they will issues and permit for a new facility.This study will be used by the client to satisfy that requirement. LIMITING CONDITIONS RaceTrac is responsible for representations about its development plans,marketing expectations and for disclosure of any significant information that might affect the ultimate realization of the projected results. There will usually be differences between projected and actual results because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, and the differences may be material. We have no responsibility to update our report for events and circumstances occurring after the date of our report. Payment of any and all of our fees and expenses is not in any way contingent upon any factor other than our providing services related to this report. February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Key Findings 4 Location Data 6 Economic &Demographic Overview 9 Demand/Supply Analysis 12 Fiscal Benefit Analysis 16 Appendix 19 February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 4 Key Findings RaceTrac Convenience and Gas Store, Naples, FL February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 5 The following paragraphs represent the key findings of our analysis. The metrics used to estimate the demand /supply ratio for Convenience and Gas facilities is the calculation of annual sales of gasoline expected to be consumed within the Primary Market Area (“PMA”)in relation to the estimated annual sales of gasoline supplied within the same PMA.The analysis of the site’s location, supply and demand ratio and the annual fiscal benefit, provide market evidence the addition of the proposed RaceTrac facility will increase the market efficiencies and benefit Collier County for years to come.Below are the conclusions from our analysis. •The supply /demand ratio revealed a undersupply of gasoline to support the demand within the PMA.Based on our analysis, there is a shortage of 919,607 gallons of gas annually in 2017 growing to 1,483,236 gallons by 2022. •Collier County charges impact fees for new development to support capital improvements related to growth.Using the current impact fee schedule, the proposed RaceTrac facility will pay a one time fee of $282,406. •Collier County collects local gasoline taxes to support transportation maintenance.Based on the estimated annual sale of 1,141,562 gallons of gas, and the current tax per gallon at $.13,the proposed RaceTrac facility will generate $148,403 annually to Collier County. •Collier County Ad Valorem taxes are based on the assessed value and the local millage rate for the site.The site currently has a millage rate of $11.46 per thousand of the assessed value.Based on a review of other RaceTrac facilities in Collier County,we have estimated the proposed RaceTrac facility to have an assessed value of $2,300,000.This assessed value and millage rate reflect an estimated 2017 Ad Valorem tax revenue of $26,358.The site current generates $3,419.45 in annual tax revenue to the county. •Overall Collier County will generate a total of $282,486 in one time fees and $174,761 in annual fees between gasoline taxes and new Ad Valorem taxes.The provides market evidence that the proposed facility will be a benefit to the county as a whole. Location Data The subject is located on Tamiami Trail East,the main transportation corridor to Naples and the points north in Collier County,FL.The general area is an older established part of the county which is in the process of transition due to it’s desirable location close to employment centers and entertainment venues in Collier County.The site has a total of 2.12 acres and is improved with an older, functionally inadequate improvement that has been vacant for over 10 years. Economic and Demographic Overview The PMA is defined as a 5 minute drive time surrounding the site.Population and Household growth is anticipated to increase as the area transitions to newer homes and commercial development. Demand Supply Analysis Supply and Demand analysis for Convenience and gas facilities is based on annual household gasoline expenditures within the PMA fordemand and the total gasoline sales within the PMA for supply.The relationship between these two metrics provides a measure ofoversupply or undersupply of gasoline sales.For this site,we estimated an undersupply of gasoline sales in the market in 2017 andcontinuingtogrowin2022. Fiscal Benefit AnalysisCollierCountywill benefit from the one time impact fee charge of $282,485 that supports capital improvement infrastructure related togrowthinthe County.Annually, the proposed RaceTrac facility will contribute gasoline tax revenue and Ad Valorem tax revenue totaling acombined$174,761. Location and Limited Supply Will Contribute to Market Success February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 6 Location Data RaceTrac Convenience and Gas Store, Naples, FL February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 7 The proposed RaceTrac facility is located on the northwest corner of Shadowlawn Dr and Tamiami Trail East in Naples, FL.The property is within close proximity to Olde Naples and newly developing areas northwest of the site. A new Wawa Store is proposed at the intersection of Tamiami Trail E and Rattlesnake Hammock,which is 2.5 miles south of the site and just outside the subject’s 5 minute drive primary market area. The RaceTrac Facility is the Proximate to Downtown Naples February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 8 The proposed RaceTrac facility will have a 5,411 square foot retail store,nine service lanes with 9 gas pumps with good visibility from both Tamiami Trail East and Bayshore Drive to the south.The area along Tamiami Trail and Bayshore Drive is going through a transition of redevelopment with the new convenience retail facility contributing to the revitalization of these traffic corridors. RaceTrac Will Spur Redevelopment in The Area February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 9 Economic & Demographic Overview RaceTrac Convenience and Gas Store, Naples, FL February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 10 The PMA is a 5 minute drive time radius around the site.The area is made up of a mix of older residential and commercial uses that service the Naples and South Collier Markets.Older residential product is being updated to reflect the demand for the areas convenient location close to employments centers, shopping, entertainment and beaches.Older commercial uses are being redeveloped or being converted to residential uses. The Primary Market Area is Transitioning Due to it’s Convenient Location February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 11 The site in near the largest concentration of employment centers in Collier County,with Tamiami Trail being the main transportation corridor for access to those employment centers.Residential and commercial development south of the site will serve as additional demand drivers for the goods and services offered at this RaceTrac. Tamiami Trail is the Main Transportation Corridor for Employment February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 12 Demand / Supply Analysis RaceTrac Convenience and Gas Store, Naples, FL February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 13 The demand for additional convenience and gas facilities in a market is driven by the number of occupied households and their annual expenditure on gasoline.In order to estimate the annual demand in dollars for Gas,we first must know the number of households occupied within the market.Using data from the ESRI Housing Profile,we estimated a total of 9,794 households currently exist within the PMA.Not all of the households are permanently occupied due to the seasonal nature of the market, therefore,we assumed a 25%vacancy factor to account for the seasonality.This reflects an effective annual HH count of 9,052 units in 2017 increasing to 9,684 units in 2022. The next step is to use the annual HH expenditure for gasoline to determine the total gas expenditure for the PMA.Based on the ESRI Automotive Expenditures, each HH in this market spends $2,399 annually on gas,for a total PMA market expenditure of $21,716,257 in 2017 and $23,232,419 in 2022. Demand for Gas is Increasing Due to New Development Line Census 2010 2017 2022 Source 1 Permanent Population 15,048 16,338 17,468 ESRI Demographic Profile 2 Annual Change Pop 1.22% 1.38% 3 Households/Units 4 Occupied 6,215 6,827 7,351 ESRI Housing Profile 5 Vacant 2,867 2,967 3,111 ESRI Housing Profile 6 Total Households/Units 9,082 9,794 10,462 ESRI Housing Profile 7 Annual Change in HH Growth 1.12% 1.36% 8 Annual Vacancy Factor 25%741.75 778 Line 5 x 25% 9 Effective Annual Housing Unit Demand 9,052 9,684 Line 6 minus line 9 10 2017 Average HH Expenditure on Gas and Diesel 2,399$ ESRI Automotive Aftermarket Expenditures 11 Estimated Gas Expenditure in Market Area By Year 21,716,257$ 23,232,419$ Line 10 X Line 11 February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 14 The existing facilities within the primary market area are older and do not offer the gasoline capacity or services of the proposed RaceTrac facility.There are several newly developed RaceTrac facilities throughout the county that are outside the PMA. A competing Wawa convenience and gas facility is located just south of the PMA,however, the proposed RaceTrac facility is closer to employment Centers and the Olde Naples area which has very limited convenience and gas facilities. The Competition Is Older and Generally South of the Subject February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 15 Based on data from the National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS)2017 Retail Fuels Report, the US consumes 9.33M barrels of gas per day or 392M gallons.Of the total gallons of gas consumed daily, 80%is sold at retail facilities,of which 86%are sold by convenience stores with gas.There are an estimated 123,807 convenience stores that sell an average of 2,179 gallons of gas per week day,or 794,817 gallons annually.Using the February 2018 cost per gallon of fuel of $2.69, a typical store sells $2,138,057 annually in gas.There are a total of eight convenience stores with gas within our PMA that have a total annual revenue of $17,104,457 in gas sales.If we assume the proposed RaceTrac will generate similar annual sales to the others in the market,we can estimate the annual market supply for gas would generate $19,242,515 or roughly $20,000,000 in gas sales. Supply is Limited Due to The Built Up Nature of the PMA Within the PMA,we estimated an annual market demand for over $21,700,000 for gas in 2017 and $23,200,000 in 2022.Within the same PMA,we estimated the existing facilities can supply $19,000,000 in gas,a shortage of approximately 2,500,000 annually.The addition of the RaceTrac facility will enhance the supply by $2,100,000 for a total of $19,250,000.This additional supply brings the supply demand ratio closer to a overall balance,with a leakage factor of $2,473,743 in annual sales in 2017,widening to a leakage of $3,989,904 in 2022. Line Item Units Source 1 Barrels of Gas sold per day in US 9,330,000 2016 NACS Retail Report 2 Gallons per Barrel 42 3 Gallons of Gas sold per day 391,860,000 Line1 times line 2 4 Percent Sold at Retail Facilities 80%2017 NACS Retail Report 5 Gallons sold at retail facilities 313,488,000 line 3 times line 4 6 Percent Sold at Convenience Stores 86%2017 NACS Retail Report 7 Gallons Sold at Convenience Stores 269,599,680 line 5 times line 6 8 Total Convenience stores with Gas 123,807 2017 NACS Retail Report 9 Gallons Sold per Convenience Store 10 Avg Daily Gallons Sold 2,178 line 7 divided by line 8 11 Annual Gallons Sold 794,817 line 10 x line 11 Price Per Gallon 2.69$ Annual Gasoline Sales per Station 2,138,057$ 12 Current Stations in 5 Minute Market 8 Collier County Property Data 13 Total Annual Sales of Gas in Market 17,104,457$ line 11 times line 12 Additional Annual Sales from of Racetrac 2,138,057$ Total Annual Sales Including RaceTrac 19,242,515$ 2017 2022 Market Area Demand Based on Annual Gas Expenditures 21,716,257$ 23,232,419$ Market Area Supply based on Existing Facilites 17,104,457$ 17,104,457$ RaceTrac Additional Supply 2,138,057$ 2,138,057$ Total Market Supply including Proposed RaceTrac 19,242,515$ 19,242,515$ Leakage/Surplus factor 2017 Dollars 2,473,743$ 3,989,904$ Leakage/Suplus factor in Gallons 919,607 1,483,236 February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 16 Fiscal Benefit Analysis RaceTrac Convenience and Gas Store, Naples, FL February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 17 Collier County Will Benefit From New Facility Annual Gasoline Taxes Collier County collects gasoline taxes to support road maintenance.These taxes are paid on a per gallon basis and include a local option tax of $.11 , a County Fuel Tax of $.01 and a Ninth Cent Gas Tax that is received by the state of $.01.Total Gas Taxes collected per gallon is $.13.Based on our estimate of 1,141,562 annual gallons sold for the proposed RaceTrac, the site will contribute $148,403 in annual gasoline taxes annually. Annual Ad Valorem Taxes Collier County Ad Valorem Taxes are estimated based on a review of the other RaceTrac facilities within the County.The four otherfacilitiessurveyed has an average of 5,326 SF of retail space and 2.79 acres of land.Average assessed value for the facilities was estimated at $2,314,313,with an average annual tax collected of $24,153.Based on these comparable properties,we have estimated theAssessedvalueforthe subject at $2,300,000.The current Millage rate for the site is 11.16,which results in an estimated annual tax amount of $26,358.Below are the comparable properties reviewed to support the assessed value estimate. Gasoline Tax per Gallon Local Option Gas Tax per gallon 0.11$ County Fuel Tax 0.01$ Ninth Cent Gas Tax 0.01$ Total per Gallon 0.13$ Estimated Annual Gallons Sold 1,141,562 Estimated Gas Taxes Collection 148,403$ Address Building Size Lot Size Acres Assessed Value 2017 RE Tax Bill 1150 Airport Road 5,928 2.06 2,567,353$ 25,364.26$ 11700 Tamiami Tr E 6,137 3.95 2,312,383$ 25,440.80$ 8485 David Blvd 6,000 3.54 2,273,682$ 25,421.56$ 3725 Pine Ridge Road 3,238 1.59 1,930,003$ 17,146.75$ Average 5,326 2.79 2,314,313$ 24,153.41$ February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 18 Impact Fees Impact fees are one time charges paid at the time construction permits are pulled for development of a new structure.The Fees are designed to support infrastructure growth in Collier County. The subject site is currently improved with an older 1,914 SF structure that was originally developed as a 5 pump gas station. An impact fee credit is provided to the client to account for the existing structure and 5 gas pumps. The calculation to the right estimates the total Impact fees due for the structure if it were built on a vacant site.The impact fees for all categories are based on a per pump fee with the exception of the Fire Impact Fee which is based on the 5,411 total SF of the building.The total Impact Fees for a new structure on a vacant lot are $283,813.18 Because the site is improved with an older structure that had 5 gasoline pumps,Collier County grants an impact fee credit for the existing improvements.Based on the impact fee credit calculation provided by the Collier County,the client will receive a credit of $38,997.84 toward the total $283,813.18.Net the credit, the county will received $244,815.34 in additional impact fees due to the development of the proposed RaceTrac. Collier County Will Benefit From Additional Impact Fees Impact Fees (Per Pump) EMS 203.29$ Government Buildings 1,348.35$ Jail 714.32$ Law Enforcement 808.70$ Road 12,614.58$ Total Impact Fee per Pump 15,689.24$ Total Pumps 18 Total Impact Fees without Fire 282,406.32$ Fire Impact Fee Based on $.26 PerSF Under Roof Total Building SF 5411 Total Fire Impact Fee 1,406.86$ Total Impact Fee 283,813.18$ Less Impact Fee Credit Fire 497.64$ Road 27,163.10$ Jail 2,633.85$ EMS 749.60$ Government Buildings 4,971.75$ Law Enforcement 2,981.90$ Total Impact Fee Credit 38,997.84$ Total Impact Fees Due After Credit 244,815.34$ February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 19 Appendix RaceTrac Convenience and Gas Store, Naples, FL February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 20 View of site from across Shadowlawn Dr. View of Subject Property from Intersection of Tamiami Trail and Shadowlawn Dr. February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 21 Shadowlawn Dr Facing South Tamiami Tr facing northwest, subject in right of photo. February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 22 NACS 2016 Retail Fuel Report 2016 RETAIL FUELS REPORT NACS RETAIL FUELS REPORT The NACS Retail Fuels Report, now in its 15th year, explains market conditions that affect gas prices—and what to watch for in 2016. INTRODUCTION 2 WHO SELLS AMERICA’S FUEL? 3 Convenience stores sell 80% of the gasoline in the United States—most are one-store businesses. THE PRICE PER GALLON 6 Retail fuels prices are ultimately determined by four sets of costs: crude oil, taxes, refining costs, and distribution and marketing. WHY GAS PRICES GO UP IN THE SPRING 8 Summer-blend fuels, infrastructure maintenance and an increase in seasonal demand all create challenges that can affect retail fuels prices. PLASTIC AT THE PUMP 11 The use of credit and debit cards is incredibly convenient. But that convenience comes at a cost. GRAPHICS Convenience Store Census 13 Are You Average? 14 The Fueling Industry at a Glance 15 Gasoline Taxes by State 16 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report | 1 About NACS NACS was founded August 14, 1961, as the National Association of Convenience Stores. The U.S. convenience store industry, with more than 154,000 stores across the country, posted $696 billion in total sales in 2014, of which $483 billion were motor fuels sales. NACS has 2,100 retail and 1,700 supplier member companies, which do business in nearly 50 countries. NACS serves the convenience and fuel retailing industry by providing industry knowledge, connections and advocacy to ensure the competitive viability of its members’ businesses. The association serves as the industry’s voice in the federal government and its issues are as varied as the industry it represents, from swipe fees to motor fuels. For more information, visit www.nacsonline.com. 2 | 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report INTRODUCTION Approximately 39 million Americans fill up their gas tanks on a daily basis, oftentimes searching for a good price and convenient location. There is arguably no product that consumers think more about on a daily basis—yet at the same time is so misunderstood. Because U.S. convenience stores sell an estimated 80% of the gasoline purchased, NACS wants to demystify how the market works—from the time crude oil is extracted from the ground to when fuel flows into a consumer’s gas tank. As 2016 began, gas prices were at $2.00 a gallon and falling and oil prices were at lows not seen since the early 2000s. While consumers were delighted with lower prices, according to NACS surveys, prices could change as supply and demand shift, whether from world events or from the annual spring transition to summer-blend fuel. The NACS Retail Fuels Report was developed to help facilitate an open discussion about the issues impacting supply and prices through a better understanding of the retail fuels markets and help ease frustrations that consumers often experience when gasoline prices increase. And, most importantly, we hope this resource can help provide insights and expertise on discussions that address the U.S. motor fuels industry. More information on the fueling industry is available at www.nacsonline.com/fuels. Single-store operators account for 59% of all convenience stores selling fuel. WHO SELLS AMERICA’S FUEL? There are more than a 154,000 convenience stores in the United States, and more than 124,000 of these retail outlets sell motor fuels. In fact, U.S. convenience stores sell 80% of the gasoline purchased by Americans who fuel up their vehicles about four to five times each month. But who owns these retail fueling locations? The answer is that it’s highly unlikely the owner is an oil company, and it’s very likely the store is being run by an independent operator with ties to the community. Overall, the convenience retailing industry is dominated by single-store operators, which account for 59% of all convenience stores selling fuel (73,433 stores total). While major oil companies have essentially exited the retail fuels business, it often looks like they dominate the retail landscape. Many single-store operators may not have the resources to brand their stores separately from the companies they sell and promote on their canopies, often leading to consumer misperceptions that they are businesses owned and operated by a major oil company. (Source: NACS/Nielsen 2016 Convenience Industry Store Count) How Fuel Retailers Operate Major oil companies have essentially exited the retail fuels business, but it often looks like they dominate the retail landscape. About half of the fueling stations in the United States sell a brand of fuel from one of the 15 major refiners/suppliers, which often makes the signage touting a particular fuel brand seem like an oil company owns the store. The contractual relationship for fuels is much like that inside the store, where beverage companies often help provide branded fountain dispensers that dispense a branded soft drink. Both the oil company and the beverage company help the retailer sell product, but that doesn’t mean they own the store. Major oil companies shed their retail portfolios to better utilize their assets in upstream production (oil refining and/or oil production). But there is obvious value to having a company name displayed in front of millions of consumers every day, which is why the major oil companies continue to brand stations they don’t own or operate. Another reason is that branded relationships provide oil companies a guaranteed customer for their product, and at predictable volumes. OWNERSHIP OF U.S. CONVENIENCE STORES SELLING FUEL 1 Store 51–200 Stores 201–500 Stores 500+ Stores 11–50 Stores 2–10 Stores 59% 4.3% 8.9% 5.5% 5.6% 16.7% 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report | 3 The Benefits of Being Branded For retailers, being branded means consumer recognition. More than half of all convenience stores selling fuels (59%) are single-store operations, so having a branded contract with a major refiner/supplier instantly provides a retailer with a familiar brand for their top product: motor fuels. While the price of gasoline is the No. 1 consideration for most consumers on where they decide to purchase gasoline, one out of 11 motorists said that the brand of fuel determines where they purchase gasoline. A branded contract guarantees fuel supply, especially when supplies are tight. Supply guarantees can smooth out extreme price volatility seen in the wholesale gas markets. There also are non-fuel benefits to branding. Operators can take advantage of the oil company’s knowledge in retail best practices for attracting customers and employee training tools. Retailers can also receive financial support such as an imaging allowance (loan) to improve the look of the store. The Benefits of Being Unbranded Other retails prefer to be unbranded. At unbranded stations, the fuel brand is usually the same as the store name. While this fuel doesn’t have a proprietary additive package, it does have a general additive package that meets all federal and local fuels requirements. Stores typically seek to be unbranded if they feel that their store name is strong enough to convey trust in their product. In most instances, unbranded gasoline has lower wholesale prices because there are not the added benefits of branded fuel, whether that includes marketing support, the additive package or market intelligence. Unbranded retailers are able to find the best “deal” for wholesale product on the open market, regardless of brand. They may also enter into supply arrangements with a branded company to purchase fuel that is sold as unbranded. If supplies are tight, unbranded retailers may have more trouble obtaining product, since oil companies first service their stores, their branded contracts and other contracts. When supply is limited, unbranded retailers must compete for what’s available, and wholesale prices are often much higher. Contractual Terms for Branded Contracts While every contract differs, here is a broad overview of what is included in these contracts: • Length: A typical contract is for 10 years, although contracts may be as long as 20 years or as short as 3 years for renewed contracts. • Volume requirements: Contracts typically set forth a certain amount of fuel each month that retailers must sell. Usually retailers can sell more than the agreed-to amount, but when supply disruptions exist, they may be put on allocation and only given a percentage of what they historically receive in a given time period. This enables the supplier to more efficiently manage fuel distribution to all branded outlets in an equitable fashion. • Image requirements: A branded retailer receives marketing muscle from its oil company partner, which may include broad advertising to encourage in-store sales. Also, the oil company may provide financial incentives to display its brands. This also depends on who operates the station and whether the store owner has access to capital. In exchange, the oil company expects the store to adhere to certain imaging requirements, including specific colors, logos and signage, standards of cleanliness and service. The oil company often relies on mystery-shopping programs to assess compliance. • Wholesale price requirements: A branded retailer must purchase fuel from a branded supplier or distributor. Branded contracts benchmark the wholesale price to common fuels indexes, such as Platt’s, plus a premium of a few cents for brand/ marketing support. Some branded contracts also stipulate the retail markup on the fuel through a “consignment agreement,” whereby the supplier or distributor retains ownership of the fuel until it is sold and pays the retailer a commission. 4 | 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report | 5 Types of Branded Retailers There are different ownership structures within the branded station universe: • Regional company or chain operated: A chain of convenience stores with a common name that operates the branded locations. In many cases, a chain may sell different brands at different stores, based on the needs of the marketplace and terms of contracts that may have been carried forward from stores that were acquired from other operators. Many operations of this kind serve as distributors to themselves and maintain supply agreements with the branded oil companies. • Lessee dealers: The dealer/retailer owns the business. A major or regional oil company or a distributor owns the land and building and leases it to a dealer. The dealer operates the location and pays rent to the owner, as opposed to an open dealer who owns the property. This arrangement gives the oil company or distributor a guaranteed supply outlet for its petroleum products, pursuant to a supply contract. A typical lessee dealer may operate more than one facility and does not wholesale gasoline or sell to other dealers. • Open dealer operated: The independent dealer purchases fuel from the oil company or a distributor, supplies fuel to the station, and possibly others, owns the business and owns or leases the building/facility independent from any supply agreement. The dealer may contract with a manager to run the business or run it himself. • Company operated: A “salary operation” where a major or regional oil company or a distributor owns the building/facility and the business. The company pays a salary to the managers/proprietors and supplies fuel to the location. This is also known as company- operated and direct operated retail. 6 | 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report THE PRICE PER GALLON Retail gasoline prices are among the most recognizable price points in American commerce. And with good reason: Gasoline purchases account for approximately 4%–5% of consumer spending. The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimated that the average U.S. household spent about $2,000 for gasoline in 2015. At the same time, gas prices are among the least understood prices in the country because they often appear to increase or decrease on a daily basis without much warning. Here is a primer on what goes into the price of a gallon of gasoline, and what causes prices to go up or down and vary from state to state and store to store. There are four broad factors that can impact retail prices: • Fuel Type: Typically, stores that sell fuel under the brand name of a refiner pay a premium for that fuel, which covers marketing support and signage, as well as the proprietary fuel’s additive package. These branded stores also tend to face less wholesale price volatility when there are supply disruptions. • Delivery Method: Retailers who purchase fuels via “dealer tank wagon” have the fuel delivered directly to the station by the refiner. They may pay a higher price than those who receive their fuels at “the rack” or terminal. In addition, a retailer may contract with a jobber to deliver the fuel to his stations or operate his own trucks—the choice will influence his overall cost. • Length of Contract: Even if they sell unbranded fuels, retailers may have long-term contracts with a specific refiner. The length of the contract and its associated terms can affect the price that retailers pay for fuels. • Volume: Retailers may receive a better deal based on the amount of fuels that they purchase, whether based on volume per store or total number of stores. Even within a specific company, stores may not each have the same arrangements, since companies often sell multiple brands of fuels, especially if they have acquired sites with existing supply contracts. But no matter who owns the station, retail fuels prices are ultimately affected by four sets of costs: • Crude oil prices have by far the biggest effect on retail prices. Crude oil costs are responsible for about half of the cost of a gallon of gasoline. In 2015, crude oil costs were 48% of the retail price of gasoline. While there may be slight variations in the costs of refining or distributing and retailing fuels, crude oil prices can experience huge swings. • Taxes are largely per gallon, although some areas have sales taxes on fuels, and those taxes increase as the price increases. There sometimes are significant disparities between stations located in the same market area but in different cities, counties or states. (See map of state tax rates on page 13.) • Refining costs include the labor, materials, energy and other costs necessary for refining crude oil into gasoline, as well as the profits to refinery owners. • Distribution and marketing costs are the price component that includes distributing and marketing gasoline from refiners to wholesale marketers and/or retail marketers, and the profits made by the wholesale and retail marketers. Sales strategies can also impact gas prices. Fuel retailers face the same question that all retailers face: sell at a low profit per unit and make up for it on volume, or sell at a higher profit per unit and expect less volume? But there also are several considerations in setting fuel prices that retailers of other products don’t face: • Wholesale Price Changes: Competing retailers in a given area may have very different wholesale prices based on when they purchased their fuel, especially during times of extreme price volatility. Gasoline is a commodity, and its wholesale price can have wild 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report | 7 • swings. It’s not unusual to see wholesale price swings of 10 cents or more in a given day. Depending on sales volumes and storage capacity, retailers get as many as three deliveries a day or as few as one delivery every three days or so. Due to competition for consumers, retailers may not be able to adjust their prices in response to an increase in wholesale prices because their competition may not have incurred a similar increase in their cost of goods sold. Conversely, a retailer may adjust his prices when the competition adjusts prices, either following or in advance of a shipment. • Contracts: How retailers buy fuel can play a significant role in pricing strategy. Retailers sign long-term contracts (10 years is the norm), and these contracts may dictate the amount and frequency of their shipments. When supplies are tight, retailers with long-term contracts may have lower wholesale costs than retailers who compete for a limited supply on the open market, but they may also face allocations (a limit on the amount of fuel that they may obtain) on the amount of fuel they receive. Each of these factors adds complexity to a retailer’s pricing strategy, and they can create unusual market dynamics. There are times when the retailer with the highest posted price in a given area actually may be making the least per gallon, based on when, how and where the fuel was purchased. No matter what their pricing strategy, retailers tend to reduce their markup to remain competitive with nearby stores when their wholesale gas prices increase. This can lead to a several-day lag from the time wholesale prices rise until retail prices rise. Likewise, when wholesale gas prices decrease, retailers may be able to extend their markup and recover lost profits, with retail gas prices dropping slower than wholesale prices. Despite extreme volatility, retail margins for fuel are fairly consistent on an annual basis. Over the past five years, the annual average retail mark-up (the difference between retail price and wholesale cost) has averaged 19.7 cents per gallon. Ultimately, retailers set a price that best balances their need to cover their costs with the need to remain competitive and attract consumers, who are very price sensitive and will shop somewhere else for a difference of a few cents per gallon. In terms of retail profitability and its pattern, both are the opposite of what most consumers think. Due to the volatility in the wholesale price of gasoline and the competitive structure of the market, fuel retailers typically see profitability decrease as prices rise, and increase when prices fall. On average, it costs a retailer about 12 to 16 cents to sell a gallon of gasoline. Using the five-year average markup of 18.9 cents, the typical retailer averages about 5 cents per gallon in profit. (Retailer costs to sell fuel include credit card fees, utilities, rent and amortization of equipment.) Over the course of a year, retail profits (or even losses) on fuels can vary wildly. In some cases, a few great weeks can make up for an otherwise dreadful year, or vice versa. Due to the volatility in the wholesale price of gasoline and the competitive structure of the market, fuel retailers typically see profitability decrease as prices rise, and increase when prices fall. Post-Refinery Refining Taxes Crude Oil48% 19% 19% 14% OIL IS HALF THE COST OF GASOLINE (Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, cumulative 2016 monthly averages.) 8 | 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report Year Date Price Peak Date Price Increase % increase 2015 February 2 $2.068 June 15 $2.835 76.7¢37.1 2014 February 3 $3.292 April 28 $3.713 42.1¢12.8 2013 February 4 $3.538 Feb. 25 $3.784 24.6¢7.0 2012 February 6 $3.482 April 2 $3.941 45.9¢13.2 2011 February 7 $3.132 May 9 $3.965 83.3¢26.6 2010 February 1 $2.661 May 10 $2.905 24.4¢9.2 2009 February 2 $1.892 June 22 $2.691 79.9¢42.2 2008 February 4 $2.978 July 21 $4.104 $1.126 37.8 2007 February 5 $2.191 May 21 $3.218 $1.027 46.9 2006 February 6 $2.342 May 15 $2.947 60.5¢25.8 2005 February 7 $1.909 April 11 $2.280 37.1¢19.4 2004 February 2 $1.616 May 24 $2.064 44.8¢27.7 2003 February 3 $1.527 March 17 $1.728 20.1¢13.2 2002 February 4 $1.116 April 8 $1.413 29.7¢26.6 2001 February 5 $1.443 May 14 $1.713 27.0¢18.7 2000 February 7 $1.325 June 19 $1.681 35.6¢26.9 (Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration) WHY GAS PRICES GO UP IN THE SPRING Historically, by springtime U.S. gas prices begin to increase and generally peak around Memorial Day. Most consumers assume that prices peak at this point because of the advent of the summer-drive season. But is that the case? To a certain extent, seasonal demand is a factor. But there are other events that, with demand, collectively have a greater effect on prices each spring, leading to price peaks right before Memorial Day. In six of the past 16 years (38% of the time), the seasonal peak took place between May 9 and May 24. Crude oil prices drive gas prices, but how the crude oil is processed also plays a significant role in price increases. The petroleum industry’s switchover to summer-blend fuels, a process that begins each February and ends June 1, creates challenges that also affect retail fuels prices. Since final implementation of the Clean Air Act Amendments in 2000, the seasonal transition to summer-blend fuel has helped gasoline prices climb significantly before they reach their peak. Comparing prices the first week in February to their seasonal peak, increases have ranged from a low of 20 cents per gallon in 2003 to a high of $1.13 per gallon in 2008; on average, the annual increase is 53 cents per gallon. Refinery maintenance is also a factor because maintenance schedules are based on gasoline demand. Demand for gasoline in the United States is generally the lowest during the first two months of the year, so refinery maintenance, known as a “turnaround,” is often scheduled during the first quarter. Another reason for scheduling turnarounds during this period is that it falls between peak heating oil 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report | 9 season and peak summer drive season, allowing refineries to retool for summer-blend fuels. After first-quarter maintenance, refineries switch to summer-blend production in April. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines April to June as the “transition season” for fuel production. Refineries lead this transition and switch over to summer-blend production in March and April. There are also more fuels to produce during the transition season. In the winter months, only a few fuels are used across the United States. However, because of various state or regional requirements, 14 different fuel specifications are required for the summer months. Refineries must produce enough for each area to ensure that there are no supply shortages. In addition to added costs to produce the fuel, prices are also affected by increased demand, maintenance costs and capacity decreases. The end point in a series of handoffs to prepare for summer-blend fuel is the date that retailers must sell the fuel. In most areas of the country that require summer- blend fuels, retailers have until June 1 to switch to summer-grade gas. Some retailers must sell summer-blend fuels much earlier. In Northern California, retailers must sell summer- blend fuel on May 1, a month earlier than the rest of the country, and in Southern California, the deadline is two months earlier: April 1. One reason why California has a longer summer-blend period than other states is its longer period of high temperatures, particularly in the desert areas, which are located in the air district with the worst quality of air. Other key deadlines put stress on the system. Nationwide, refiners must produce summer-blend fuel no later than April 1. (Obviously, deadlines are earlier for California’s fuels.) From refineries, fuels travel through pipelines at about 4 miles per hour, or 100 miles per day. Fuels refined on the Gulf Coast can take several weeks to reach storage terminals throughout the country, which is why the deadline to have summer-blend fuel at terminals and storage facilities is May 1—a month after the transition at the refineries. The May 1 deadline for terminals is considered one of the biggest factors in seasonal price increases. Terminals have to fully purge their systems of winter-blend fuels and be near empty to make the transition and be in compliance. Those terminals out of compliance face stiff penalties, so most terminal operators would rather be out of inventory than out of compliance. This regulatory requirement leads to lower inventories at the terminal. Combined with increased demand, this puts upward pressure on prices. Demand is often cited as the main reason for spring price increases. In 2015, U.S. demand for petroleum products averaged 19.4 million barrels/day, of which 9.2 million barrels/day were gasoline. But world demand for oil is around 94 million barrels/day, more than four times the total of U.S. demand and 10 times U.S. demand for gasoline alone. U.S. demand for gasoline has declined from its peak in 2007, but world demand for oil has increased, which elevates oil prices and subsequently drives gas prices. While demand has increased, supply has increased even faster the past two years and this oversupply of product has helped push oil and gas prices downward. 10 | 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report Still, U.S. gasoline demand is a factor in the annual spring increase. Demand begins to increase in February and typically peaks in August. The common misperception is that there is a huge increase in demand for the Memorial Day weekend with the official beginning of the summer- drive season. There is an increase in demand, but it is only a few percentage points per month. However, a 1% increase in U.S. gasoline demand does mean that an extra 90,000 barrels per day must be produced, which is the equivalent of the output of a small refinery. During the six-month period when demand is higher, the problem is compounded. In 2015, demand per day in August was 817,000 barrels per day higher (9.4%) than in February. This demand increase creates enormous pressure on the system and makes it extremely vulnerable to supply disruptions. As demand decreases and temperatures cool, retailers can switch over to selling winter-blend fuel, beginning September 15. While these winter-blend fuels are cheaper to produce, the complications of the switchover often lead to a temporary bump in price, usually a few cents per gallon. The weather may also affect gas prices in the fall. Hurricanes, especially those that damage Gulf Coast refining operations, place significant pressure on supplies and affect prices across the country. Unlike in the spring, the change to winter-blend fuel is not required. However, because winter-blend fuel costs less, retailers often sell the cheaper fuel so they can be as price competitive as possible. Not all retailers begin selling this fuel on September 15; most wait to make the switch until their inventories are low. A retailer’s volume will dictate how often a station receives deliveries, with some stores having multiple deliveries per day and others needing just one or two deliveries per week. By the end of September, gas prices generally decrease as the complications from this switchover are processed and demand continues to fall. Despite what conspiracy theorists believe, price decreases in the fall have everything to do with a decrease in demand and shift in fuel specifications and nothing to do with pre-election politics. There are exceptions to the rule. Summer-blend fuel requirements may be relaxed in times of emergencies or when potential shortages are possible. That was the case in 2005 as Hurricane Katrina made landfall in Louisiana at the end of August and significantly affected Gulf Coast refining operations. Several states successfully petitioned for waivers to temporarily exempt retailers from reformulated gas and other fuel requirements through September 15. Only the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the authority to issue these waivers. 2015 U.S. GASOLINE DEMAND Month in 2015 Gasoline Demand (million barrels/day)Change from Month Prior January 8.718 -2.5% February 8.650 -0.8% March 9.055 +4.7% April 9.139 +0.9% May 9.251 +1.2% June 9.391 +1.5% July 9.438 +0.5% August 9.467 +0.3% September 9.275 -2.0% October 9.250 -0.3% November 9.109 -1.5% December 9.305*+2.2% * based on preliminary numbers using weekly demand averages (Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, “U.S. Product Supplied of Finished Motor Gasoline”) 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report | 11 PLASTIC AT THE PUMP Americans have made more payments at stores by credit or debit card than they did with cash or checks every year since 2003, according to the American Bankers Association. Over the past decade, the trend has accelerated, especially at the gas pump. Today, 72% of consumers pay for fuel at the pump with plastic, according to results from the 2016 NACS Consumer Fuels Survey. With approximately three-quarters of consumers at the pump paying by plastic, most retailers have no choice but to accept credit and debit cards. However, credit and debit card transactions result in retailers paying swipe fees (also known as interchange fees). These fees typically average between 2% and 3% of the total purchase, but can be as high as 4%. Because retailers already have razor-thin margins on fuel (the average gross margin on fuel has averaged only 6.2% before expenses over the past five years), these costs are passed along to the consumer in terms of higher gas prices. Gross margins aren’t to be confused with profit margins. After factoring in expenses, most retailers make, at best, a few cents per gallon in pretax profit, and may even lose money on some sales when margins are tight and credit card expenses are high. In every year since 2006, overall convenience store profits were lower than the fees that they paid credit card companies and banks for processing transactions. In 2014, the industry reported profits of $10.4 billion and credit card fees of $11.4 billion. THE COST OF PAYMENTS (based on a 10-gallon fill-up when gas is $3.00/gallon) Cash: none Debit: 2.4 cents per gallon.* Debit fees are 21 cents per transaction, plus other costs, with a maximum charge of 24 cents for the transaction. *This is only true for the 60% of debit cards that are regulated. The other 40% of debit cards carry fees that are closer to those for credit cards: around 2%. Credit: 6 cents per gallon. Credit card swipe fees include both fixed and variable costs. Taken together on a typical fueling, they average 2%, or 6 cents per gallon. 12 | 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report Skimming Fuel dispensers can also be attractive targets for thieves looking to steal credit and debit card information by “skimming,” an aggressive tactic used to illegally obtain consumer card data for fraudulent purposes. Skimming can occur at the point of sale or when a card leaves someone’s sight for a brief period of time. Fuel dispensers are among the potential targets for skimming. In these cases, a third-party card-reading device is installed either outside or inside a fuel dispenser, which allows a thief to capture a customer’s credit and debit card information. Every day, 39 million Americans fuel their vehicles and 28 million (72% of all fuel customers) pay for their fuel by debit or credit card. There is no reliable data on the number of skimming incidents but they are a small fraction of overall fill-ups. Most often, only one skimmer is installed at a site that may have from 8 to 24 fuel payment points. When a skimmer is installed, it captures an average of 30 to 100 cards per day. Even if a skimmer were undetected for two weeks, it would capture data on less than 1,500 cards. There are three types of payment points most associated with skimming: • Fuel dispensers: Convenience stores sell 80% of the gas purchased in the United States, and more than 124,000 convenience stores sell fuel. The U.S. con- venience store industry has 765,000 fuel dispensers (customers can fill up on each side of a dispenser) and approximately 1.45 million dispenser payment points. • Restaurants and bars: An unscrupulous server can swipe a customer’s card in a skimmer in addition to swiping the card legally when taking payment. There are an estimated 600,000 restaurants in the United States. • ATMs: Skimming devices can be attached to ATMs to gather card information. There are about 425,000 ATMs in the United States, with an estimated 150,000 at convenience stores. ATMs located outdoors and outside of a bank are potentially more vulnerable. EMV Liability Shift EMV is a globally accepted card specification that uses an embedded microchip to provide dynamically unique data protection when the card is inserted into a chip-card reader. EMV is an acronym for Europay, MasterCard and Visa, and is a payment specification created by EMVCo (a special entity owned by Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover, JCB and UnionPay). After the October 2015 liability shift, U.S. card-accepting merchants without the ability to accept EMV cards may be liable for fraudulent transactions. A similar liability shift also occurs for fuel island payment terminals after October 2017. To comply with EMV in the United States, convenience stores face added costs in upgrading their terminals and software to accept EMV transactions. EMV payments use a computer chip located on the front of the payment card to transmit data from the card to the card reader. The chip is intended to reduce fraud and theft of consumer data. In October 2015, Jared Scheeler, a convenience store operator in North Dakota with four Hub convenience stores, testified before the U.S. House Small Business Committee that the transition to EMV at three existing stores, including making the point-of-sale operating systems and fuel dispensers EMV compatible, has cost him approximately $44,500 per store. At a fourth store, Scheeler purchased six new fuel dispensers at $17,000 each, in addition to an EMV compatible point of sale card reader at $2,000 for in-store purchases; the total upgrade at that store has cost him more than $100,000. Across the entire convenience and fuel retailing industry, the average cost per store to become EMV compliant is about $30,000. With more than 154,000 convenience stores across the United States, the industry will pay more than $3.9 billion to move to EMV. Unlike the rest of the world, in the United States, new EMV cards do not require the use of a PIN (personal identification number), which weakens the effectiveness of EMV and protecting consumers from fraud. A 2013 Federal Reserve study revealed that not using PIN carries 400% more fraud, which is why PIN use is the de facto standard for world payments.To comply with EMV in the United States, convenience stores face added costs in upgrading their terminals and software to accept EMV transactions. 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report | 13 U.S. CONVENIENCE STORE INDUSTRY U.S. C-STORE COUNT BY REGION As of December 31, 2015 1 32,761 2 37,645 3 23,495 4 24,498 5 13,363 6 22,433 Total 154,195 Convenience stores account for 34.2% of retail outlets in the United States tracked by Nielsen. Convenience stores (Source: Nielsen as of December 31, 2015) 154,195 Superettes/ Supermarkets/ Supercenters 51,055 Drugstores 41,969 Dollar Stores 27,378 The NACS/Nielsen Convenience Store Census NACS denes a convenience store as a retail business that provides the public with a convenient location to quickly purchase a wide variety of consumable products and services, generally food and gasoline. While not a xed requirement, convenience stores have the following general characteristics: 1. Building size of fewer than 5,000 square feet. 2. Off-street parking and/or convenient pedestrian access. 3. Extended hours of operation, with many open 24 hours, seven days a week. 4. Offer at least 500 stock keeping units (SKUs). 5. Product mix includes a signicant mix of tobacco, beverages, snacks, candy and grocery items. Since 1995, NACS has worked with Nielsen to accurately count and classify businesses in the convenience and fuel retail channel of trade. This store count is based on the convenience store universe, tracked and marketed by Nielsen, and is endorsed by NACS. View a detailed store count fact sheet at nacsonline.com/storecount. The U.S. convenience retailing industry has roughly doubled in size over the last three decades. At year-end 1985, the store count was 90,900 stores, at year-end 1995 the store count was 101,100 stores and at year- end 2005 the store count was 140,665 stores. 14 | 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report HOW DO AMERICANS GET TO WORK? THE AVERAGE AMERICAN VECHICLE GAS CUSTOMERS ARE YOU AVERAGE? How the average American drives and uses fuel. 41% also go inside the store. (Source: 2016 NACS Consumer Fuels Survey) (Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration) 85% 85% drive or carpool 5% public transportaion 3% walk 4% work from home (Source: U.S. Census Bureau) (Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration; IHS Automotive) 64% of gas customers say that price is the main consideration for where they fuel up. (Source: 2016 NACS Consumer Fuels Survey) 72% pay by credit card or debit card. (Source: 2016 NACS Consumer Fuels Survey)$64% Is 11.5 years old. Travelled 33 miles/day Consumed 546 gallons of gas in 2015. (Source: IHS Automotive) 72% 41% 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report | 15 THE FUELING INDUSTRY AT A GLANCE Over the past ve years, retailer gross margins have averaged 6.2% (19.7 cents per gallon). (Source: OPIS) A record 17.5 million cars and light trucks were sold in 2015. Light-duty truck sales accounted for 56% of all vehicle sales. (Source: Autodata Corp.) 56% There are 257.9 million registered vehicles in the United States. (Source: IHS Automotive) 257.9 m There are 124,374 convenience stores selling motor fuels in the United States. Less than 0.4% are owned by one of the ve major oil companies. (Source: NACS/Nielsen 2016 Convenience Industry Store Count) U.S. gasoline demand increased 2.6% to 9.2 million barrels per day in 2015. (Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Short-Term Energy Outlook, January 2016) 9.2 MILLION BARRELS PER DAY 6.2% 2.6% > 0.4% 16 | 2016 NACS Retail Fuels Report Greater than 49.5 cents/gallon 40.0–49.5 cents/gallon Less than 40.0 cents/gallon U.S. Average: 47.99 cents/gallon 62.90 49.50 59.02 52.25 50.40 46.15 42.40 47.81 37.40 30.65 60.75 37.28 38.40 35.40 40.20 38.41 39.27 49.42 35.15 40.73 53.6539.80 44.40 48.94 46.40 68.80 61.04 48.41 48.29 51.60 54.98 48.86 42.23 37.19 40.40 42.43 46.10 48.40 41.40 47.00 50.40 48.58 51.30 35.70 MA 44.94 RI 52.40 CT 55.91 NJ 32.90 DE 41.40 MD 51.00 DC 41.90 GASOLINE TAXES Combined Local, State and Federal (cents per gallon) (Source: American Petroleum Institute, as of January 14, 2016; for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon or used for compliance purposes.) COPYRIGHT © 2016, BY NACS | All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, mechanical or electronic, including photocopying, taping, recording or information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior, written permission of the publisher. National Association of Convenience Stores 1600 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314 703/684-3600 www.nacsonline.com February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 23 Housing Profile Percent 100.0% 70.3% 37.5% 32.8% 29.7% Percent 100.0% 2.4% 8.4% 10.8% 9.0% 11.6% 8.2% 14.7% 9.0% 10.4% 5.0% 10.5% Population Households 2017 Median Household Income $44,192 2017 Total Population 16,266 2022 Median Household Income $50,231 2010 Total Population 14,985 2017-2022 Annual Rate 2.59% 2017-2022 Annual Rate 1.34% 2022 Total Population 17,388 Census 2010 2017 2022 Percent Number Total Housing Units 9,082 100.0%9,794 100.0%10,461 Housing Units by Occupancy Status and Tenure Number Percent Number 69.7%7,351 Owner 3,660 40.3%3,658 37.3%3,919 Occupied 6,215 68.4%6,827 32.4%3,432 Vacant 2,867 31.6%2,967 30.3%3,111 Renter 2,555 28.1%3,169 2017 2022 Percent Number Total 3,659 100.0%3,919 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Number 4.5%94 $50,000-$99,999 601 16.4%330 <$50,000 166 17.3%422 $150,000-$199,999 434 11.9%353 $100,000-$149,999 633 9.9%455 $250,000-$299,999 242 6.6%321 $200,000-$249,999 364 10.5%576 $400,000-$499,999 205 5.6%351 $300,000-$399,999 383 5.7%408 $750,000-$999,999 129 3.5%196 $500,000-$749,999 208 8.0%413$1,000,000+294 $297,586 Average Value $325,068 $417,090 Median Value $199,482 Total 9,082 100.0% Census 2010 Housing Units Number Percent In Urban Clusters 0 0.0% In Urbanized Areas 8,990 99.0% Rural Housing Units 92 1.0% February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 24 Demographic and Income Profile Percent 12.0% 11.3% 12.7% 13.7% 19.8% 10.3% 10.7% 4.2% 5.3% Number Percent 800 4.8% 698 4.5% 615 4.5% 722 4.5% 981 5.6% 1,987 12.2% 1,883 11.3% 2,020 10.7% 1,848 13.0% 1,776 14.5% 1,278 10.4% 415 4.1% Number Percent 12,009 75.6% 1,516 12.7% 89 0.6% 137 1.4% 9 0.1% 903 6.8% 362 2.9% 4,226 31.9% Summary Census 2010 2017 2022 Households 6,241 6,857 7,384 Population 15,024 16,311 17,439 Average Household Size 2.23 2.21 2.21 Families 3,510 3,813 4,081 Renter Occupied Housing Units 2,557 3,172 3,435 Owner Occupied Housing Units 3,684 3,685 3,949 Trends: 2017 - 2022 Annual Rate Area State National Median Age 44.1 46.3 47.5 Households 1.49%1.30%0.79% Population 1.35%1.36%0.83% Owner HHs 1.39%1.19%0.72% Families 1.37%1.25%0.71% 2017 2022 Median Household Income 2.60%2.13%2.12% Number <$15,000 846 12.3%887 Households by Income Number Percent 833 $25,000 - $34,999 996 14.5%935 $15,000 - $24,999 846 12.3% 1,012 $50,000 - $74,999 1,350 19.7%1,461 $35,000 - $49,999 1,075 15.7% 764 $100,000 - $149,999 600 8.8%792 $75,000 - $99,999 579 8.4% 311 $200,000+326 4.8%388 $150,000 - $199,999 239 3.5% Median Household Income $44,223 $50,269 $77,797 Per Capita Income $30,731 $34,687 Average Household Income $68,693 Population by Age Percent Number Percent Number Census 2010 2017 2022 830 5 - 9 4.6%772 4.7%789 0 - 4 5.3%787 4.8% 778 15 - 19 4.8%716 4.4%790 10 - 14 4.1%698 4.3% 977 25 - 34 13.2%2,088 12.8%2,122 20 - 24 6.5%963 5.9% 1,972 45 - 54 13.4%1,922 11.8%1,861 35 - 44 12.5%1,899 11.6% 2,274 65 - 74 11.8%2,204 13.5%2,528 55 - 64 12.3%2,166 13.3% 1,805 85+2.8%625 3.8%712 75 - 84 8.5%1,472 9.0% Race and Ethnicity Percent Number Percent Number Census 2010 2017 2022 13,181 Black Alone 10.1%1,890 11.6%2,213 White Alone 79.9%12,617 77.4% 109 Asian Alone 0.9%190 1.2%240 American Indian Alone 0.6%99 0.6% 13 Some Other Race Alone 6.0%1,059 6.5%1,183 Pacific Islander Alone 0.1%11 0.1% 500Two or More Races 2.4%445 2.7% 5,564Hispanic Origin (Any Race)28.1%4,893 30.0% February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 25 Automotive Aftermarket Expenditures Demographic Summary 2017 2022 Households 6,872 7,400 Population 16,338 17,468 Median Age 46.3 47.5 Families 3,822 4,091 Median Household Income $44,248 $50,291 Index Spent Total Spending Potential Average Amount Payments on Vehicles excluding Leases 86 $1,925.76 $13,233,843 Transportation - Local Gasoline 87 $2,355.32 $16,185,790 Gasoline and Motor Oil Motor Oil 87 $14.56 $100,067 Diesel Fuel 82 $43.99 $302,281 Vehicle Maintenance & Repairs 87 $936.17 $6,433,366 Other Vehicle Expenses Tire Purchase/Replacement 85 $137.27 $943,304 Vehicle Coolant/Brake/Transmission Fluids 85 $7.27 $49,975 Vehicle Accessories including Labor 92 $9.33 $64,124 Vehicle Parts/Equipment/Accessories 88 $58.04 $398,834 Miscellaneous Auto Repair/Servicing 92 $115.23 $791,891 Vehicle Cleaning Services including Car Washes 90 $21.93 $150,700 Vehicle or Engine Repairs 86 $203.73 $1,400,012 Vehicle Body Work & Painting 87 $34.25 $235,400 Lube/Oil Change & Oil Filters 88 $95.93 $659,197 Vehicle Motor Tune-up 89 $50.38 $346,243 Vehicle Shock Absorber Replacement 80 $12.60 $86,557 Vehicle Front End Alignment/Wheel Balance & 85 $28.68 $197,105 Auto Repair Service Policy 87 $31.77 $218,325 Tire Repair and Other Repair Work 88 $129.76 $891,699 Rental of Vehicles excluding Trips 91 $43.37 $298,005 Vehicle Insurance 89 $1,041.86 $7,159,664 Basic Lease Charge for Cars/Trucks 80 $249.56 $1,715,005 Leased Vehicles 81 $276.16 $1,897,746 Vehicle Pers Property Taxes/State & Local Registr Fees 86 $153.05 $1,051,756 Car/Truck Lease Fees & Down Payments 83 $26.59 $182,741 Vehicle Inspection Fees 86 $13.15 $90,392 Driver`s License Fees 89 $10.30 $70,761 Parking Fees excluding Residence (Not on Trips)83 $40.36 $277,320 Parking Fees & Tolls excluding Trips 82 $77.91 $535,371 Towing Charges 91 $5.09 $34,989 Tolls/Electronic Toll Passes excluding Trips 80 $37.55 $258,051 Auto Service Clubs & GPS Services 91 $28.48 $195,720 February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 26 Florida Fuel Rates Florida Dept. of Revenue, 2017 Fuel Tax Rates, Page 1 Revised 2017 Florida Fuel Tax, Collection Allowance, Refund, and Pollutants Tax Rates Page Exhibit Description of Exhibit 2 A Rate Changes for 2017 2 B 2017 State Taxes, Inspection Fee, Ninth Cent, Local Option, Additional Local Option, and SCETS Fuel Taxes 3 C Tax and Collection Allowance Rates by Form and Line Item 5 D Local Option Tax Entitled and Not Entitled to Collection Allowance (Gasoline, Gasohol, and Fuel Grade Ethanol) 6 E Pollutants Tax Rates 6 F Refund Rates 7 G Licensed Mass Transit System Provider Credit/Refund Rate (Gasoline, Gasohol, and Fuel Grade Ethanol) 8 H Refundable Portion of Local Option and State Comprehensive Enhanced Transportation System (SCETS) Tax. This schedule is used by qualified mass transit system providers, farmers, commercial fishermen, and aviation ground support companies to determine the refund rate on gasoline (Part II of Form DR-138 and DR-160). 8 I Shared Collection Allowance Rates Florida Dept. of Revenue, 2017 Fuel Tax Rates, Page 2 Exhibit A Rate Changes for 2017 Statewide Fuel Taxes on Motor Fuel (Gasoline, Gasohol, and Fuel Grade Ethanol) Excise Sales 9th Cent Inspection Fee Local Option SCETS Total All Counties 0.040 0.134 0.00 .00125 0.06 0.074 0.30925* *- Total does not include local option taxes above the statewide minimum collected and remitted by licensed wholesalers and terminal suppliers on each sale, delivery, or consignment to retail dealers, resellers, and end users. See Exhibit B for the local option tax above the minimum on motor fuel. Statewide Fuel Taxes on Undyed Diesel Fuel Excise Sales 9th Cent Local Option SCETS Total All Counties 0.040 0.134 0.01 0.06 0.074 0.318 Statewide Fuel Taxes on Aviation Fuel State Tax All Counties .069 New Taxes Imposed/Repealed: 1. Franklin County - Ordinance number 2016-07 increases the levy of Local Option Gas Tax from five cents to six cents. Exhibit B 2017 State Taxes, Inspection Fee, Ninth Cent, Local Option, Additional Local Option and SCETS Motor Fuel Taxes COUNTY STATE TAXES Inspection Fee 9TH- CENT Local Option Additional Local Option SCETS *COUNTY TOTAL Minimum Local Option Local Option Above Minimum **TOTAL TAX IMPOSED Alachua 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Baker 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Bay 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Bradford 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Brevard 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Broward 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Calhoun 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Charlotte 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Citrus 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Clay 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Collier 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Columbia 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Miami-Dade 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.03 0.074 0.174 0.134 0.04 0.34925 DeSoto 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Dixie 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Duval 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Escambia 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.04 0.074 0.184 0.134 0.05 0.35925 Flagler 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Franklin 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Gadsden 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Gilchrist 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Glades 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Gulf 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Hamilton 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Hardee 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Hendry 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.02 0.074 0.164 0.134 0.03 0.33925 Hernando 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Highlands 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Florida Dept. of Revenue, 2017 Fuel Tax Rates, Page 3 COUNTY STATE TAXES Inspection Fee 9TH- CENT Local Option Additional Local Option SCETS *COUNTY TOTAL Minimum Local Option Local Option Above Minimum **TOTAL TAX IMPOSED Hillsborough 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Holmes 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Indian River 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Jackson 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Jefferson 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Lafayette 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Lake 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Lee 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Leon 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Levy 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Liberty 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Madison 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Manatee 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Marion 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Martin 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Monroe 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.03 0.074 0.174 0.134 0.04 0.34925 Nassau 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Okaloosa 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.03 0.074 0.174 0.134 0.04 0.34925 Okeechobee 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Orange 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Osceola 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Palm Beach 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Pasco 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Pinellas 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Polk 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Putnam 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 St. Johns 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 St. Lucie 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Santa Rosa 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Sarasota 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Seminole 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Sumter 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Suwannee 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Taylor 0.174 0.00125 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Union 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Volusia 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Wakulla 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Walton 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 Washington 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 * County Total = 9th Cent + Local Option + Additional Local Option + SCETS ** Total Tax Imposed = County Total + State Taxes + Inspection Fee Exhibit C Tax and Collection Allowance Rates By Form and Line Item Terminal Supplier Wholesaler/Importer Blender/Retailer of Alternative Fuel Florida Air Carrier DR-309631 DR-309632 DR-309635 DR-182 State Tax, Inspection Fee, and Minimum Local Option Tax Gasoline (State and Minimum Local Option Tax) Page 4 (Line 10) 0.30925 Page 4 (Line 8) 0.30925 Page 4 (Line 8) 0.30925 Page 3 (Line 23) 0.30925 Page 13 (Line 6) Page 13 (Line 6) Page 13 (Line 6) Page 3 (Line 24A) Page 13 (Line 20) Page 13 (Line 20) Page 13 (Line 20) Page 17 (Line 2) Florida Dept. of Revenue, 2017 Fuel Tax Rates, Page 4 Terminal Supplier Wholesaler/Importer Blender/Retailer of Alternative Fuel Florida Air Carrier DR-309631 DR-309632 DR-309635 DR-182 State Tax, Inspection Fee, and Minimum Local Option Tax Undyed Diesel Page 4 (Line 10) 0.174 Page 4 (Line 8) 0.174 Page 4 (Line 8) 0.174 Page 3 (Line 23) 0.174 Page 13 (Line 6) Page 13 (Line 6) Page 13 (Line 6) Page 3 (Line 24A) Page 13 (Line 20) Page 13 (Line 20) Page 13 (Line 20) Page 17 (Line 2) Aviation Page 4 (Line 11) 0.069 Page 4 (Line 9) 0.069 Page 4 (Line 9) 0.069 Page 3 (Line 22) 0.069 Page 13 (Line 6) Page 13 (Line 6) Page 13 (Line 6) Page 3 (Line 24B) Page 13 (Line 20) Page 13 (Line 20) Page 13 (Line 20) Page 17 (Line 2) Collection Allowance (Gasoline) Page 4 (Line 12) 0.00326 Page 4 (Line 10) 0.00326 Page 4 (Line 10) 0.00326 Page 3 (Line 26) 0.00326 Page 13 (Line 8) Page 13 (Line 8) Page 13 (Line 8) Page 17 (Line 4) Collection Allowance (Undyed Diesel) Page 4 (Line 13) 0.0067 Page 4 (Line 11) 0.0067 Page 4 (Line 11) 0.0067 Page 3 (Line 27) 0.0067 Page 13 (Line 8) Page 13 (Line 8) Page 13 (Line 8) Page 17 (Line 4) Collection Allowance (Aviation) Page 4 (Line 12) 0.002 Page 4 (Line 10) 0.002 Page 4 (Line 10) 0.002 Page 3 (Line 25) 0.002 Page 13 (Line 8) Page 13 (Line 8) Page 13 (Line 8) Page 17 (Line 4) Local Option Tax (Gasoline) Local Option Tax Entitled to Collection Allowance See Exhibit D See Exhibit D See Exhibit D See Exhibit D Collection Allowance Page 4 (Line 16) 0.011 Page 4 (Line 14) 0.011 Page 4 (Line 14) 0.011 Page 3 (Line 30) 0.011 Local Option Tax Not Entitled to Collection Allowance See Exhibit D See Exhibit D See Exhibit D See Exhibit D Local Option Tax (Undyed Diesel) Local Option Tax Entitled to Collection Allowance Page 4 (Line 19) 0.070 Page 4 (Line 17) 0.070 Page 4 (Line 17) 0.070 Page 3 (Line 33) 0.070 Page 13 (Line 10) Page 13 (Line 10) Page 13 (Line 10) Page 17 (Line 6) Collection Allowance Page 4 (Line 20) 0.011 Page 4 (Line 18) 0.011 Page 4 (Line 18) 0.011 Page 3 (Line 34) 0.011 Page 13 (Line 12) Page 13 (Line 12) Page 13 (Line 12) Page 17 (Line 8) Local Option Tax Not Entitled to Collection Allowance Page 4 (Line 21) 0.074 Page 4 (Line 19) 0.074 Page 4 (Line 19) 0.074 Page 3 (Line 35) 0.074 Page 13 (Line 14) Page 13 (Line 14) Page 13 (Line 14) Page 17 (Line 10) Shared Collection Allowance Add-back Rates (Schedule 12) Gasoline Page 13 (Line 22) 0.00163 Page 13 (Line 22) 0.00163 Page 13 (Line 22) 0.00163 NA Undyed Diesel Page 13 (Line 22) 0.00335 Page 13 (Line 22) 0.00335 Page 13 (Line 22) 0.00335 NA Aviation Page 13 (Line 22) 0.001 Page 13 (Line 22) 0.001 Page 13 (Line 22) 0.001 NA Florida Dept. of Revenue, 2017 Fuel Tax Rates, Page 5 Exhibit D Local Option Tax Entitled and Not Entitled to Collection Allowance (Gasoline, Gasohol, and Fuel Grade Ethanol) County Code County Name Local Option Tax Entitled to Collection Allowance Local Option Tax Not Entitled to Collection Allowance 1 Alachua 0.01 0.05 2 Baker 0.01 0.00 3 Bay 0.01 0.00 4 Bradford 0.00 0.00 5 Brevard 0.00 0.00 6 Broward 0.01 0.05 7 Calhoun 0.00 0.00 8 Charlotte 0.01 0.05 9 Citrus 0.01 0.05 10 Clay 0.01 0.00 11 Collier 0.01 0.05 12 Columbia 0.01 0.00 13 Miami-Dade 0.01 0.03 14 DeSoto 0.01 0.05 15 Dixie 0.00 0.00 16 Duval 0.00 0.00 17 Escambia 0.01 0.04 18 Flagler 0.01 0.00 19 Franklin 0.00 0.00 20 Gadsden 0.00 0.00 21 Gilchrist 0.01 0.00 22 Glades 0.01 0.00 23 Gulf 0.01 0.00 24 Hamilton 0.00 0.00 25 Hardee 0.01 0.05 26 Hendry 0.01 0.02 27 Hernando 0.01 0.05 28 Highlands 0.01 0.05 29 Hillsborough 0.01 0.00 30 Holmes 0.01 0.00 31 Indian River 0.00 0.00 32 Jackson 0.01 0.00 33 Jefferson 0.01 0.00 34 Lafayette 0.00 0.00 35 Lake 0.01 0.00 36 Lee 0.01 0.05 37 Leon 0.01 0.05 38 Levy 0.00 0.00 39 Liberty 0.01 0.00 40 Madison 0.01 0.05 41 Manatee 0.01 0.05 42 Marion 0.01 0.05 43 Martin 0.01 0.05 44 Monroe 0.01 0.03 45 Nassau 0.01 0.00 46 Okaloosa 0.01 0.03 47 Okeechobee 0.01 0.05 48 Orange 0.00 0.00 49 Osceola 0.01 0.05 50 Palm Beach 0.01 0.05 51 Pasco 0.01 0.05 52 Pinellas 0.01 0.00 53 Polk 0.01 0.05 54 Putnam 0.01 0.05 55 St. Johns 0.00 0.00 Florida Dept. of Revenue, 2017 Fuel Tax Rates, Page 6 County Code County Name Local Option Tax Entitled to Collection Allowance Local Option Tax Not Entitled to Collection Allowance 56 St. Lucie 0.01 0.05 57 Santa Rosa 0.01 0.05 58 Sarasota 0.01 0.05 59 Seminole 0.01 0.00 60 Sumter 0.01 0.00 61 Suwannee 0.01 0.05 62 Taylor 0.00 0.00 63 Union 0.01 0.00 64 Volusia 0.01 0.05 65 Wakulla 0.01 0.00 66 Walton 0.01 0.00 67 Washington 0.01 0.00 Exhibit E Pollutants Tax Rates Coastal Protection Statute Barrel Gallon Products 206.9935(1) 0.02 0.00048 Rate applies to all applicable product types Water Quality 206.9935(2) 0.00 0.025 Motor Oil and Other Lubricants 0.00 0.059 Solvents 0.05 0.00119 Petroleum Products, Chlorine, and Pesticides 0.00 5.00 Perchloroethylene 0.02 0.00048 Ammonia Inland Protection 206.9935(3) 0.80 0.01904 Rate applies to all applicable product types Exhibit F Refund Rates Application For Fuel Tax Refund Mass Transit System Provider Fuel Tax Return Local Government User of Diesel Fuel Tax Return Non- Public Schools Municipalities, Counties, and School Districts Agriculture, Aquacultural, Commercial Fishing, and Commercial Aviation Purposes Mass Transit System Users Form Number DR-309633 DR-309634 DR-190 DR-189 DR-138 DR-160 Gasoline – State Tax Credit/Refund Rate See Exhibit G .144 .134 .144 .144 / .134** .134 **- .134 applies to commercial aviation purposes only. Gasoline – Local Option tax Credit/Refund Rate See Exhibit G NA NA NA See Exhibit H See Exhibit H Florida Dept. of Revenue, 2017 Fuel Tax Rates, Page 7 Undyed Diesel Credit/Refund Rate (On-road Use) .268 .144 .134 .144 NA .134 Credit/Refund Rate (Off-road Use) NA .318 NA NA NA NA Undyed Diesel – Local Option Tax Credit/Refund Rate (On-road Use) NA NA NA NA NA .134 Dyed Diesel (Tax Due) Tax Rate (On-road Use) .05 .174 NA NA NA NA NA – Refund, credit or tax rate does not apply. Exhibit G Licensed Mass Transit System Provider Credit/Refund Rate (Gasoline, Gasohol, and Fuel Grade Ethanol) County Code County Name Credit/Refund Rate County Code County Name Credit/Refund Rate (State and Local Option taxes) 1 Alachua 0.318 35 Lake 0.268 2 Baker 0.268 36 Lee 0.318 3 Bay 0.268 37 Leon 0.318 4 Bradford 0.268 38 Levy 0.268 5 Brevard 0.268 39 Liberty 0.268 6 Broward 0.318 40 Madison 0.318 7 Calhoun 0.268 41 Manatee 0.318 8 Charlotte 0.318 42 Marion 0.318 9 Citrus 0.318 43 Martin 0.318 10 Clay 0.268 44 Monroe 0.298 11 Collier 0.318 45 Nassau 0.268 12 Columbia 0.268 46 Okaloosa 0.298 13 Miami-Dade 0.298 47 Okeechobee 0.318 14 DeSoto 0.318 48 Orange 0.268 15 Dixie 0.268 49 Osceola 0.318 16 Duval 0.268 50 Palm Beach 0.318 17 Escambia 0.308 51 Pasco 0.318 18 Flagler 0.268 52 Pinellas 0.268 19 Franklin 0.268 53 Polk 0.318 20 Gadsden 0.268 54 Putnam 0.318 21 Gilchrist 0.268 55 St. Johns 0.268 22 Glades 0.268 56 St. Lucie 0.318 23 Gulf 0.268 57 Santa Rosa 0.318 24 Hamilton 0.268 58 Sarasota 0.318 25 Hardee 0.318 59 Seminole 0.268 26 Hendry 0.288 60 Sumter 0.268 27 Hernando 0.318 61 Suwannee 0.318 28 Highlands 0.318 62 Taylor 0.268 29 Hillsborough 0.268 63 Union 0.268 30 Holmes 0.268 64 Volusia 0.318 31 Indian River 0.268 65 Wakulla 0.268 32 Jackson 0.268 66 Walton 0.268 33 Jefferson 0.268 67 Washington 0.268 34 Lafayette 0.268 Florida Dept. of Revenue, 2017 Fuel Tax Rates, Page 8 Exhibit H Refundable Portion of Local Option and State Comprehensive Enhanced Transportation System (SCETS) Tax County Code County Name Credit/Refund Rate County Code County Name Credit/Refund Rate (State and Local Option taxes) 1 Alachua 0.184 35 Lake 0.134 2 Baker 0.134 36 Lee 0.184 3 Bay 0.134 37 Leon 0.184 4 Bradford 0.134 38 Levy 0.134 5 Brevard 0.134 39 Liberty 0.134 6 Broward 0.184 40 Madison 0.184 7 Calhoun 0.134 41 Manatee 0.184 8 Charlotte 0.184 42 Marion 0.184 9 Citrus 0.184 43 Martin 0.184 10 Clay 0.134 44 Monroe 0.164 11 Collier 0.184 45 Nassau 0.134 12 Columbia 0.134 46 Okaloosa 0.164 13 Miami-Dade 0.164 47 Okeechobee 0.184 14 DeSoto 0.184 48 Orange 0.134 15 Dixie 0.134 49 Osceola 0.184 16 Duval 0.134 50 Palm Beach 0.184 17 Escambia 0.174 51 Pasco 0.184 18 Flagler 0.134 52 Pinellas 0.134 19 Franklin 0.134 53 Polk 0.184 20 Gadsden 0.134 54 Putnam 0.184 21 Gilchrist 0.134 55 St. Johns 0.134 22 Glades 0.134 56 St. Lucie 0.184 23 Gulf 0.134 57 Santa Rosa 0.184 24 Hamilton 0.134 58 Sarasota 0.184 25 Hardee 0.184 59 Seminole 0.134 26 Hendry 0.154 60 Sumter 0.134 27 Hernando 0.184 61 Suwannee 0.184 28 Highlands 0.184 62 Taylor 0.134 29 Hillsborough 0.134 63 Union 0.134 30 Holmes 0.134 64 Volusia 0.184 31 Indian River 0.134 65 Wakulla 0.134 32 Jackson 0.134 66 Walton 0.134 33 Jefferson 0.134 67 Washington 0.134 34 Lafayette 0.134 This schedule must be used to determine the refund rate for the gasoline portion of Part II. (DR-138 and DR-160). Exhibit I Shared Collection Allowance Rates Gasoline Undyed Diesel Aviation .00163 .00335 .001 February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 27 Collier County Commercial Impact Fee Schedule Eff July 24, 2017 February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 28 Collier County Commercial Impact Credit Calculation Impact Fee Calculation Summary The current date and time is 11/20/2017 2:15:42 PM Your Selection: Use: Service Station Location: Collier County (Default) Fire District: East Naples (aka Greater Naples) # Fuel Positions: 5 Total Area Sq. Ft.: 1914 Utility impact fee NOT INCLUDED. Please contact Utilities at 252-6237 for water and sewer impact fees. Impact Fee Cost Parks Regional $0.00 Parks Community $0.00 Library $0.00 Fire $497.64 School $0.00 Road $27,163.10 Jail $2,633.85 Emergency Medical Service $749.60 Government Building $4,971.75 Law Enforcement $2,981.90 Total Fee $38,997.84 Disclaimer: This calculator was designed as a tool to enable an applicant to estimate impact fees. The impact fee rates provided are consistent with the adopted Impact Fee Ordinance. There are many factors that may affect the total assessment, including determination of land use and credits for previous structures. Estimates derived from this module shall not substitute for the final fees calculated by County staff. Water and Sewer Impact Fees are not included in these calculations. Please see fee schedules or call 252-6237. Page 1 of 1Collier County Impact Fee Calculator Print Page 11/20/2017http://cvportal.colliergov.net/gmdapps/ifc/Print.aspx February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 29 Traffic Impact Analysis February 2018 | RaceTrac Shadowlawn Dr. and Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL MARKET STUDY FOR RACETRAC CONVENIENCE AND GAS FACILITY Shadowlawn Drive and Tamiami Tr, Naples, FL ICE MACHINE PROPERTY BOUNDARY EX. STATE ROAD 45 (U.S. 41) TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (R.O.W. VARIES - PUBLIC) RACETRAC MARKET 5,411 SF RETAIL MAX HEIGHT = 75' DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE EX. SHADOWLAWN DR IVE (R .O .W . 6 0 ' PUBL IC ) PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPERTY BOUNDARY25'LANDSCAPEBUFFER25'7 10 3 - 20,000 GAL. UNDERGROUND FUEL TANKS MONUMENT SIGN LOCATION 60 SF, 8' HEIGHT 10'5 55.8'2 4 1 . 4 ' 362.7' 7 42.7'28' 1 2 5 . 1 ' DRY DETENTION AREA DRY DETENTION AREA DRY DETENTION AREA 4 LOADING AREA 15' TYPE 'B' BUFFER NAPLES OUTFITTERS RETAIL ZONING: C-4 OVERLAY: BMUD OVERLAY: GTMUD 15' TYPE 'B' BUFFERABC LIQUOR / RETAIL ZONING : C-4 OVERLAY: BMUD OVERLAY: GTMUD 2 5 ' B U F F E R P E R L D C 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 MILLER SQUARE ZONING : PUD OVERLAY: BMUD ZONING : RMF-6 OVERLAY: BMUD OVERLAY: GTMUD 30.3'12 2 1INTERCONNECT TO EXISTING ABC PROPERTY 6 6 2 3 8 4 7 412.5'12.5'8 DIS T A N C E T O N E A R E S T F A C I L I T Y WIT H F U E L P U M P S : 3 1 5 ' + / - 77.3' 7 4 7 7 9 9 9 9 2 8 ' 5 DRY DETENTION AREA 5 7 . 4 '77.7'9 7 '147.1'57.5' RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT DRIVEWAY PLAN REVISIONSDATEDESCRIPTIONTownship: County, State: Part of Section(s): Project Number: Status: Sheet Number: Drawn By: Checked By: Project Manager: FOR SUBMITTAL PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT VALID WITHOUT SEAL, SIGNATURE AND DATEJTW CAS JTW 21442 25 E COLLIER COUNTY, FL 11 Range:50 SPROJECT:OWNER / DEVELOPER:2/5/2018 10:21 AMK:\21442 - RACETRAC @ SHADOWLAWN DR\EXHIBITS\DEVIATION PLAN\21442-01-DEVIATIONS-24X36.DWG#200 GALLERIA PARKWAY SE, SUITE 900ATLANTA, GA 30339(770) 431-7600RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC.SHADOWLAWN DRIVE(EPN #1266 - STORE #XXXX)1605 Hendry StreetFort Myers, FL 33901(239) 418-0691(239) 418-0692 faxFlorida Certificateof AuthorizationEngineering LB #26978N EW S30015 60 SETBACK REQUIRED FRONT (US 41, SR 45) PROVIDED 50' SIDE (NORTH) SIDE (NORTHWEST)40' FRONT (SHADOWLAWN DRIVE)50' CATEGORY BUILDING PAVEMENT / SIDEWALK TOTAL PERVIOUS EAST (SHAWDOWLAWN AVE) 15' TYPE 'B'NORTH (OFFICE) NORTHWEST (RETAIL) PROPERTY LINE BUFFER REQUIRED LAND USE SUMMARY LEGEND PARKING COUNT (RACETRAC)8 LANDSCAPE BUFFER TABLE SITE DESIGN STANDARDS SOUTHWEST (US 41, SR 45) TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST 40' 28 30 (2) CONVENIENCE STORE 5,411 SF @ 1 SPACE PER 200 SF USE RATIO REQUIRED PROVIDED TOTAL 28 PARKING SUMMARY 1. "(#)" REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF HANDICAP SPACES INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL SPACES. 2. EX. 4 SPACES ON ABC PROPERTY EXCLUDED FROM RACETRAC PARKING COUNT. NOTES: 30 (2) SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS DEVIATIONS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 PARKING COUNT (ABC) BUFFER PROVIDED 25' PER LDC 5.05.05.E.1. 15' TYPE 'B' 25' PER LDC 5.05.05.E.1. 15' TYPE 'B' 25' ENHANCED 15' TYPE 'B' 4 55.8' (CANOPY) 30.3' (STORE) / 42.7' (CANOPY) 77.3' (STORE) / 28' (CANOPY) 95.6' (STORE) / 55' (DUMPSTER) 1 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PARAMETERS BUILDINGS TOTAL UNITS SITE ACREAGE NUMBER OF STORIES 1 1 1 2.12 AC. GROSS FLOOR AREA 1 (21 FT) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V-B OCCUPANCY USE MERCANTILE (M) FIRE SPRINKLERS YES REQUIRED FIRE FLOW 2,000 GPM AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW T.B.D. GPM 5,411 SF UNITS PER BUILDING NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCTION TYPE PROVIDED BY ARCHITECT. 2. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW DETERMINED FROM 2010 NFPA 1, TABLE 18.4.5.1.2. 3. AVAILABLE FIRE FLOW FROM FIRE FLOW TEST DATED XX/XX/XX. 1 ZONING C-4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOLIO # PROJECT INFORMATION 61834720003, 61834680004, 26780080007, 26780040005 AREA 0.13 AC. PERCENTAGE 6% 100.0% 1.34 AC.63% 0.65 AC.31% 2.12 AC. A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, BEING ALL OF PARCELS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3783, PAGE 2199, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1737, PAGE 463 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3784, PAGE 1811 AND A PORTION OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2095, PAGE 370 ALL OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LESS THE RIGHT OF WAY TAKINGS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2403, PAGE 2376 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2403, PAGE 2372 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2403, PAGE 2369, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36, NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 27 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S.00°01'49"E., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 36, FOR 1237.70 FEET; THENCE S.89°28'25"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1737, PAGE 463, THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF SHADOWLAWN DRIVE, A 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE S.00°01'49"E., ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY, FOR A DISTANCE OF 408.99 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.50 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 87°41'09", A CHORD BEARING OF S.53°57'42"W., A CHORD LENGTH OF 40.87 FEET AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 45.15 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (STATE ROAD NO. 90, U.S. 41), A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE N.52°00'49"W., ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY, FOR A DISTANCE OF 390.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3783, PAGE 2199; THENCE N.37°59'11"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, FOR A DISTANCE OF 105.00 FEET; THENCE N.74°40'51"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE S.49°33'12"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.00 FEET; THENCE N.34°50'13"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 64.83 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1737, PAGE 463; THENCE N.00°10'21"W., ALONG SAID WEST LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 69.48 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE N.89°28'25"E., ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 196.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 92,137 SQUARE FEET, OR 2.115 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1. WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS OF 50 FEET TO INSTEAD ALLOW A REDUCED FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 30 FEET FOR THE EAST FRONT YARD (SHADOWLAWN DR. FRONTAGE). COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.C.4.b. WHICH LIMITS FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS TO ONE (1) ILLUMINATED CORPORATE LOGO WITH A MAXIMUM AREA OF TWELVE (12) SQUARE FEET ON A CANOPY FACE WHICH IS ADJACENT TO A DEDICATED STREET OR HIGHWAY, TO INSTEAD ALLOW ONE (1) - FIFTY (50) SQUARE FOOT CORPORATE LOGO ON THE CANOPY FACADE FACING THE TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TWO (2) - THIRTY (30) SQUARE FOOT CORPORATE LOGOS, ONE (1) ON THE FACADE FACING SHADOWLAWN DR. AND ONE (1) ON THE FACADE FACING THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL PARCEL TO THE NORTHWEST. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.C.4.b. WHICH LIMITS FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS TO ONE (1) ILLUMINATED CORPORATE LOGO PER CANOPY FACE WHICH IS ADJACENT TO A DEDICATED STREET OR HIGHWAY TO ALLOW ONE (1) ADDITIONAL ILLUMINATED CORPORATE LOGO ON THE NORTHWEST CANOPY FACADE FACING THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL PARCEL. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.a. WHICH REQUIRES LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO RIGHTS-OF-WAY EXTERNAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN A LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT WHICH IS A MINIMUM OF TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET IN WIDTH AND REQUIRES THAT WATER MANAGEMENT SWALES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THESE BUFFER AREAS TO INSTEAD ALLOW THE DRY DETENTION AREA TO OVERLAP THE BUFFER BY 12.5 FEET (50%). COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1. WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS OF 40 FEET TO INSTEAD ALLOW A REDUCED SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 28 FEET FOR THE NORTHWEST SIDE YARD (ABC PROPERTY). COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.08.D.2.b. WHICH REQUIRES THE DESIGN OF PRIMARY FACADES MUST INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, TWO OF THE DESIGN FEATURES LISTED IN 5.05.08.D.2.b TO INSTEAD ALLOW THE SIDE (SOUTHEAST) AND REAR (NORTHEAST) FACADES WHICH FACE SHADOWLAWN DRIVE BE CONSIDERED SECONDARY. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.b. WHICH REQUIRES LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO RIGHTS-OF-WAY EXTERNAL TO THE PROJECT TO INCLUDE AN UNDULATING BERM WITH A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 3:1 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED AT A MINIMUM AVERAGE HEIGHT OF THREE (3) FEET.TO INSTEAD ALLOW THE ELIMINATION OF THE 3' UNDULATING BERM. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 4.06.02.C. (TABLE 2.4) WHICH REQUIRES A 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE ABC PROPERTY TO INSTEAD ALLOW A PORTION OF THE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE ABC PROPERTY TO RE-ALLOCATED TO THE REMAINING LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AND/OR INTERNAL LANDSCAPE AREAS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 4.06.05.D.2.a WHICH REQUIRES NO MORE THAN 30% OF CANOPY TREES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED BY PALMS WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF A VEHICULAR USE AREA AND WITHIN EACH INDIVIDUAL TYPE 'D' RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO INSTEAD ALLOW UP TO 100% USE OF ROYAL PALMS WITHIN PARKING ISLANDS. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 4.06.03.B.1 WHICH REQUIRES ONE TREE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY 250 SQUARE FEET OF REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREA TO INSTEAD ALLOW ONE TREE FOR EVERY 500 SQUARE FEET OF REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPED AREA. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.c. WHICH DICTATES THE REQUIRED TREES AND PALMS SHALL BE CLUSTERED IN DOUBLE ROWS WITH A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) TREES PER CLUSTER. CANOPY TREES SHALL BE PLANTED A MAXIMUM OF TWENTY (20) FEET ON CENTER WITHIN A CLUSTER. THE USE OF PALMS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BUFFER SHALL BE LIMITED TO LANDSCAPED AREAS ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS. PALMS SHALL BE PLANTED IN STAGGERED HEIGHTS, A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) PALMS PER CLUSTER, SPACED AT A MAXIMUM OF EIGHT (8) FEET ON CENTER, WITH A MINIMUM OF A FOUR (4) FOOT DIFFERENCE IN HEIGHT BETWEEN EACH TREE TO INSTEAD ALLOW A SINGLE ROW OF ROYAL PALM TREES (24' OVERALL HEIGHT) WITH SINGLE 36” HEDGE ROW AND ADDITIONAL SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER PLANTINGS FOR THE US 41 BUFFER. COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.d. WHICH REQUIRES ALL OF THE TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FOURTEEN (14) FEET IN HEIGHT AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION. TREES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF A THREE AND ONE-HALF (3½) INCH CALIPER AT TWELVE (12) INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND AND A SIX (6) FOOT SPREAD. AT INSTALLATION, SHRUBS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TEN (10) GALLONS, FIVE (5) FEET IN HEIGHT, WITH A THREE (3) FOOT SPREAD, PLANTED FOUR (4) FEET ON CENTER TO INSTEAD ALLOW A SINGLE ROW OF ROYAL PALM TREES (24' OVERALL HEIGHT) WITH SINGLE 36” HEDGE ROW AND ADDITIONAL SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER PLANTINGS FOR THE US 41 BUFFER. 7 8 25' PER LDC 5.05.05.E.1. 7 8 11 9 7 5 12 EXISTING ABC LIQUOR STORE U T U U U U IRR M U S S S S S IC EMA C H I N EWEST BUFFER #2: 15' TYPE 'B'95 LF (2,100 S.F.) WITH SINGLEHEDGE ROW, 5' SHRUBS ANDTREES @ 25' O.C. (PER4.06.02.C., TABLE 2.4)[DEVIATION #8]OFF-SITE REPLACEMENTTREESNORTH BUFFER: 15' TYPE 'B' 197 LF WITH SINGLE HEDGE ROW, 5' SHRUBS AND TREES @ 25' O.C. (PER 4.06.02.C., TABLE 2.4) U. S . 4 1 / T A M I A M I T R A I L SHADOWLAWN DRIVEWEST BUFFER #1: 15' TYPE 'B'93 LF WITH SINGLE HEDGEROW, 5' SHRUBS AND TREES@ 25' O.C. (PER 4.06.02.C.,TABLE 2.4)EAST BUFFER: (PER 5.05.05 E.1.)25' WIDTH (396'-70' D/W = 326 LF);CLUSTERED TREES SPACED MAX. 20' ANDDBL. HEDGE ROW 5' HT.[DEVIATION #4 AND DEVIATION #7]S O U T H B U F F E R : ( P E R 5 . 0 5 . 0 5 E . 1 . ) 25' W I D T H ( 3 3 1 ' - 4 1 ' D / W = 2 9 0 L F ) ; CL U S T E R E D T R E E S S P A C E D M A X . 2 0 ' A N D D B L . H E D G E R O W 5 ' H T . [D E V I A T I O N # 7 A N D D E V I A T I O N # 9 ] SIGN VIEW CORRIDOR SIGN V IEWCORRIDOR SIGN VISIBILITY TRIANGLE PER 4.06.02.C-2 EXISTING ABC LIQUOR STORE NAPLES OUTFITTERS RA C E T R A C M A R K E T (5, 4 1 1 S . F . ) MATCHLINE 'A' 25' SITE TRIANGLE FU E L C A N O P Y FU E L C A N O P Y Exi s t i n g O v e r h e a d E l e c t r i c L i n e 14" NORFOLK IS. PINE (TO BE REMOVED) 10" SABAL PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 10" SABAL PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 20" CARROTWOOD (TO BE REMOVED) 8" EUCALYPTUS (TO BE REMOVED) 12" CARROTWOOD (TO BE REMOVED) 12" OAK (TO BE REMOVED) 14" MAHOGANY (TO BE REMOVED) 18" OAK (TO BE REMOVED) 20" SABAL PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 20" SABAL PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 4 - 14" SABAL PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 12" OAK (TO BE REMOVED) 20" OAK (TO BE REMOVED) 12" CARROTWOOD (TO BE REMOVED)20" SABAL PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 10" QUEEN PALM (TO BE REMOVED) 6" HOLLY (TO BE REMOVED) 6" HOLLY (TO BE REMOVED) 4" HOLLY (TO BE REMOVED) EX. COCOPLUM HEDGE (TO BE REMOVED) EX. COCOPLUM HEDGE (TO BE REMOVED) EX. COCOPLUM HEDGE (TO BE REMOVED) 20" OAK (TO BE REMOVED) EX. COCOPLUM HEDGE (TO BE REMOVED) 14" CARROTWOOD (TO BE REMOVED) 8" EUCALYPTUS (TO BE REMOVED) FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 45 MPH FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 30 MPH FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 30 MPH Exi s t i n g O v e r h e a d E l e c t r i c L i n e 3117 sf. V UA171 sf. V UA 133 sf. V UA 125 sf. V UA 761 sf. W. Buffer #2 1230 sf. V UA 100 sf. V UA 1322 sf. V UA 190 sf. Bld Plt 119 sf. Bld Plt 170 sf. Bld Plt 410 sf. Bld Plt SIGN 664 sf. of relocated W. Buffer #2 SCALE 1" = 30' 90'0' 15' 30' 60' GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. THE QUALITY OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL WILL MEET THE STANDARDS FOR FLORIDA GRADE NO.1 (or better), AS GOVERNED IN "GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS". 2. ALL PLANTED TREES AND PALMS WILL HAVE A 3" DEEP SAUCER CONSTRUCTED FROM THE TRUNK OF THE TREE OR PALM. MINIMUM OF 4' DIAMETER. 3. ALL PLANTING BEDS AND TREES SHALL BE COVERED WITH A 2" MINIMUM DEPTH OF MULCH AND SHALL BE WEED FREE. MULCH SHALL BE GRADE B OR BETTER. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANY VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND APPLY A PRE-EMERGENT WEED KILLER PER SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO MULCHING. NO MORE THAN 25% OF MULCH WILL BE CYPRESS, PER COLLIER COUNTY L.D.C. 4. NO CODE REQUIRED PLANTINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN EASEMENTS. 5. ANY AND ALL EXOTIC VEGETATION INCLUDING: EARLEAF ACACIA, WOMAN'S TONGUE, BISHOPWOOD, AUSTRAILIAN PINE, CARROTWOOD, ROSEWOOD, AIR POTATO, MURRAY RED GUM, WEEPING FIG, CUBAN LAUREL FIG, JAPANESE CLIMBING FERN, OLD WORD CLIMBING FERN, MELALEUCA, DOWNY ROSE MYRTLE, CHINESE TALLOW, BRAZILLIAN PEPPER, FLORIDA HOLLY, TROPICAL SODA APPLE, JAVA PLUM, ROSE APPLE, CORK TREE AND WEDELIA, ON THE PROPERTY SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF OFF SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR. THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF INVASIVE EXOTIC VEGETATION IN PERPETUITY. 6. TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 10' IN HEIGHT WITH A 2" CALIPER MEASURED AT 1' ABOVE GROUND LEVEL WITH A FOUR FOOT CANOPY UNLESS SPECIFIED AS 14' TALL TREES PER PLAN AND PLANT LIST. 7. REFER TO ENGINEERING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATIONS. 8. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FAMILIARIZING THEMSELVES WITH THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES AND ALL SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE START OF LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION. 9. FERTILIZER SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS AND COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCES. 10. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO FINE GRADE ALL PLANTING AND SODDING AREAS PRIOR TO PLANT OR SOD INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN OWNER APPROVAL OF FINAL GRADES. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE TAKEOFFS. PLANT LIST IS PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS . 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TAGS, TAPE AND SUPPORTS (EXCEPT STAKING GUYS) FROM ALL PLANTINGS PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 14. ALL AREAS OF THE SITE NOT PLANTED SHALL BE SODDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS. 15. THE REQUIRED PLANTINGS SHALL BE IRRIGATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC REQUIREMENTS. 16. THE PARKING LOTS SHALL BE SLEEVED FOR IRRIGATION BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE WITH CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS. 17. ALL BASE ROCK SHALL BE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE PARKING ISLANDS. 18. THE HEIGHT OF ALL TREES SHALL BE MEASURED FROM FINISHED GRADE AT LOCATION OF PLANTINGS. SHRUBS INTENDED FOR BUFFERING SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE HEIGHT OF THE ADJACENT PARKING GRADE IF PARKING IS ADJACENT TO THE BUFFER. 19. Plant Material Standards. 1.Quality. Plant materials used to meet the requirements of this section shall meet the standards for Florida No. 1 or better, as set out in Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants, part I and part II, Department of Agricultural, State of Florida (as amended). Root ball sizes on all transplanted plant materials shall also meet state standards. a. For sites South and West of US-41 all required landscaping shall be 100% native species as determined by accepted valid scientific reference. For sites South and West of I-75 and North and East of US-41, a minimum of 75% native trees and 50% Native shrubs are required. For sites North and East of I-75, a minimum of 75% native trees and 35% native shrubs are required. (Link to "Recommended Collier County Native Plant list" and "Native Required Planting Map"). In addition, for all sites, at least 75 percent of the trees and shrubs used to fulfill these requirements shall be drought-tolerant species as listed in the Xeriscape Plant Guide and Native Trees and Trees for South Florida (IFAS). c. Where xeric plants are to be utilized, use the South Florida Water Management District, Xeriscape Plant Guide (as amended) as a reference. SITE LANDSCAPE DATA ZONING: C4 / GTMUD OVERLAY LAND USE: COMMERCIAL TOTAL SITE: 2.12 AC (92,347 SF) GENERAL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 1 TREE PER 3000 SF OF PERVIOUS SITE AREA. 31,546 SF OF PERVIOUS AREA/3,000 = 11 TREES REQUIRED AND PROVIDED THROUGH BUFFER, V.U.A. AND BUILDING FOUNDATION TREE PLANTINGS. VEHICLE USE AREA 10% OF VEHICULAR USE AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED IN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA. ONE TREE PER 250 S.F. OF LANDSCAPE AREA WITH SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTINGS. 46,653 SF X 10% = 4,665 SF REQUIRED AND 4,870 S.F. PROVIDED. 4,665/ 500 SF (per deviation)=10 (10) TREES REQUIRED AND 10 TREES PROVIDED. BUILDING PERIMETER LANDSCAPING BUILDINGS UNDER 10,000 SF. TOTAL OF ALL FACADES x .25 x 10' =TOTAL SF OF FOUNDATION PLANTINGS REQUIRED. 53'+100'+53'+100' x .25 x 10' = 765 SF REQUIRED 889 SF. PROVIDED. Building footprint under 10,000 square feet(Length) 25 percent of the combined total of all building façade length × (Width) 10 feet wide = (Area) Total Planting Area Required. Trees and palms shall be a minimum 10 feet high at planting. Minimum width of planting beds shall be 5 feet. Trees and palms shall be provided at a rate of 1 per 300 square feet of required foundation planting area. 765 SF / 300 = 2.55 TREES REQUIRED AND 3 PROVIDED. BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: NORTH BUFFER COMMERCIAL (C-4) TO COMMERCIAL (C-4) 15' TYPE 'B' BUFFER REQUIRED TREES REQUIRED AT 25' O.C. MAX. AND MIN. 10 GALLON SHRUBS AT 5' HT., 3' SPRD., 4' O.C. MAX. 197 L.F. / 25' = 8 TREES REQUIRED AND 8 PROVIDED. 197 L.F. / 4 = 50 SHRUBS REQUIRED AND 50 PROVIDED. SOUTH BUFFER COMMERCIAL TO U.S. 41 RIGHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.) 25' BUFFER REQUIRED PER SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.c (DEVIATION #7 AND DEVIATION #9) CANOPY TREE(S) REQUIRED; CLUSTERED IN DOUBLE ROWS, MAX. SPACING AT 20' ON CENTER WITH SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS PROVIDED ALONG ENTIRE LENGTH. SHRUB ROW TO BE MAINTAINED @ 3.5' HT. EAST BUFFER COMMERCIAL TO SHADOWLAWN RIGHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.) COMMERCIAL TO U.S. 41 RIGHT-OF-WAY (R.O.W.) 25' BUFFER REQUIRED PER SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.c (DEVIATION #4 AND DEVIATION #7) CANOPY TREE(S) REQUIRED; CLUSTERED IN DOUBLE ROWS, MAX. SPACING AT 20' ON CENTER WITH SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS PROVIDED ALONG ENTIRE LENGTH. WEST BUFFER #1 COMMERCIAL (C-4) TO COMMERCIAL (C-4) 15' TYPE 'B' BUFFER REQUIRED TREES REQUIRED AT 25' O.C. MAX. AND MIN. 10 GALLON SHRUBS AT 5' HT., 3' SPRD., 4' O.C. MAX. 93 L.F. / 25' = 4 TREES REQUIRED AND 4 PROVIDED. 93 L.F. / 4 = 24 SHRUBS REQUIRED AND 25 PROVIDED. WEST BUFFER #2 COMMERCIAL (C-4) TO COMMERCIAL (C-4) 15' TYPE 'B' BUFFER REQUIRED TREES REQUIRED AT 25' O.C. MAX. AND MIN. 10 GALLON SHRUBS AT 5' HT., 3' SPRD., 4' O.C. MAX. (DEVIATION #8) 95 L.F. / 25' = 4 TREES REQUIRED AND 4 PROVIDED, (OFF-SITE REPLACEMENT). 95 L.F. / 4 = 24 SHRUBS REQUIRED AND 30 PROVIDED, (ON-SITE REPLACEMENT). NOTE: DUE TO GRADING REQUIREMENTS AND SITE INPROVEMENTS ALL EXISTING TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED P:\Drawings\2017 Jobs\RaceTrac Shadow Lawn\Drawings\RT_Shadowlawn-Version 3_LS.dwg, 2/1/2018 4:28:12 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 EXISTING ABC LIQUOR STORE U U U U IRR M U S S S S S IC E MA C H I N E 200 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA PER L.D.C. 5.05.05.(C)(4)(C) U. S . 4 1 / T A M I A M I T R A I L SHADOWLAWN DRIVE12.5' FROM LIGHTS (TYP) 1 ROYAL PALM (E.B., 24' OA.) 5 PIGEON PLUM (PARKING) 10' HT. 3 ROYAL PALM (1-W.B.#1; 2-S.B., 24' O.A.) SIGN VIEW CORRIDOR SIGN V IEWCORRIDOR SIGN VISIBILITY TRIANGLE PER 4.06.02.C-2 2 BALD CYPRESS (BD, 10' HT.) 8 'HIGHRISE' LIVE OAK (E.B., 16' HT.) 4 RED MAPLE (E.B., 16' HT.) 4 RED MAPLE (E.B., 16' HT.) R A C E T R A C M A R K E T (5, 4 1 1 S . F . ) 25 SIMPSON STOPPER (5' Ht., 4' O.C. - W.B.#1) 10 TRINETTE (BD) 17 TRINETTE (BD) 20 SIMPSON STOPPER (5' Ht., 4'O.C. - E.B.) 16 COCOPLUM (E.B.) 23 SIMPSON STOPPER (5' Ht., 4'O.C. - E.B.) 19 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 13 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 11 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 11 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 17 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 11 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 25 SOCIETY GARLIC (ABOVE CODE) 46 SPARTINA (ABOVE CODE) 62 SPARTINA (E.B.) 6 SABAL PALM 1 ROYAL PALM (PARKING, 10' CT.) 1 ROYAL PALM (PARKING, 10' CT.) 18 WALTER'S VIBURNUM (5' Ht., 4'O.C. - E.B.) 3 WALTER'S VIBURNUM (5' Ht., 4' O.C. - S.B.) 30 Dwf. FAKA. GRASS (E.B.) 20 Dwf. FAKA. GRASS (E.B.) 16 COCOPLUM (E.B.) 24 JAMACIA CAPER (S.B.) 1 ROYAL PALM (E.B., 24' OA.) 14 ROYAL PALM (S.B., 24' O.A.) MATCHLINE 'A' 25' SITE TRIANGLE 15 WALTER'S VIBURNUM W.B. #2; REPLACEMENT (5' Ht., 4' O.C.) 15 WALTER'S VIBURNUM W.B. #2: REPLACEMENT (5' Ht., 4' O.C.) 4 GREEN BUTTONWOOD OFF-SITE REPLACEMENT TREES (W.B., 14' HT.) 4 COONTIE (S.B.) 4 COONTIE (S.B.) 4 COONTIE (S.B.) 4 COONTIE (S.B.) 4 COONTIE (S.B.) 25 Dwf. IXORA (S.B.) 42 Dwf. BOUG. (S.B.) 25 Dwf. BOUG. (S.B.) 25 Dwf. BOUG. (S.B.) 25 Dwf. IXORA (S.B.) 25 Dwf. IXORA (S.B.) 30 Dwf. BOUG. (S.B.) 23 SOCIETY GARLIC (ABOVE CODE) 20 FLAX LILY (S.B.) 32 SOCIETY GARLIC (ABOVE CODE)FLORITAM SODSODSODSODFLORITAM SOD BAHIA SOD BOTTOM OF DETENTION SOD SODSOD S O D S O D BEDLINE BEDLINE BEDLINE 27 Dwf. BOUG. (PARKING) 37 Dwf. BOUG. (PARKING) 20 Dwf. BOUG. (S.B.) 27 Dwf. BOUG. (S.B.) FU E L C A N O P Y FU E L C A N O P Y Exi s t i n g O v e r h e a d E l e c t r i c L i n e 1 ROYAL PALM (BD, 10' CT.) FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 45 MPH FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 30 MPH FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 30 MPH Exi s t i n g O v e r h e a d E l e c t r i c L i n e BAHIA SOD BOTTOM OF DETENTION FLORITAM SOD SIGN 1 ROYAL PALM (PARKING, 24' 0.A.) 1 ROYAL PALM (PARKING, 10' CT.) 1 ROYAL PALM (PARKING, 10' CT.) 77 COCOPLUM, (S.B. maintain at 3' h) 25 Dwf. IXORA (S.B.) 20 FLAX LILY (S.B.) 32 SOCIETY GARLIC (ABOVE CODE) 20 FLAX LILY (S.B.) 32 SOCIETY GARLIC (ABOVE CODE) 20 Dwf. IXORA (S.B.) 20 FLAX LILY (S.B.) 13 FLAX LILY (S.B.) S S 5 PIGEON PLUM 7 'HIGHRISE' LIVE OAK (N.B., 14' HT.) NAPLES OUTFITTERS 50 SIMPSON STOPPER (N.B.; 5' Ht., 4' O.C.) 1 SUGARBERRY (N.B., 14' HT.) 19 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 13 GOLDEN CREEPER (PARKING) 1 ROYAL PALM (PARKING, 10' CT.) MATCHLINE 'A'15 WALTER'S VIBURNUM W.B. #2: REPLACEMENT (5' Ht., 4' O.C.) FDOT SIGHT DISTANCE 30 MPH3117 sf. V UA171 sf. V UA FLORITAM SOD CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG IT'S THE LAW! DIAL 811 Know what's BELOW. Call before you dig. 811 SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FLORIDA, INC. SCALE 1" = 20' 60'0' 10' 20' 40' 4 TREES (West Buffer #2-Replacement) 30 SHRUBS BUFFER REPLACEMENT PLANTING SYMBOLS (West Buffer #2-Replacement)P:\Drawings\2017 Jobs\RaceTrac Shadow Lawn\Drawings\RT_Shadowlawn-Version 3_LS.dwg, 2/1/2018 4:28:17 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 A0102 A010 4 A010 A010 3 5 6001 6001 6001 6001 6001 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE STORAGE 113 T.O.M. = 10'-0" (CMU)4' - 8"7' - 4" TYP.M-1 EF-1 EP-1 EF-2 SS-1 T.O.M. = 10'-0" (CMU)4' - 8"FACE OF CMU 4' - 8" M-1 EF-1 EF-2 SS-1 EP-1 4' - 8"T.O.M. = 10'-0" (CMU) M-3 EF-1 EF-2 SS-1 EP-1 T.O.M. = 10'-0" (CMU)4' - 8"CMUEF-1M-1EF-2SS-1WS-1MATERIAL % OF ELEVATION STONE EIFS 8% 11% WOOD METAL 53% 9% FRONT ELEVATION 291 TOTAL SF SQ. FOOT. 23 31 154 27 CMU 19%56 MATERIAL % OF ELEVATION STONE EIFS 31% 38% WOOD METAL 0% 31% REAR ELEVATION 254 TOTAL SF SQ. FOOT. 78 97 0 79 CMU 0%0 MATERIAL % OF ELEVATION STONE EIFS 41% 55% WOOD METAL 0% 4% LEFT ELEVATION 192 TOTAL SF SQ. FOOT. 79 106 0 7 CMU 0%0 MATERIAL % OF ELEVATION STONE EIFS WOOD METAL RIGHT ELEVATION SQ. FOOT. CMU 41% 55% 0% 4% 192 TOTAL SF 79 106 0 7 0%0 Mark S. Salopek, LLC DATE DESCRIPTION ISSUE/REVISION RECORD THESE PLANS ARE SUBJECT TO FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS: ANY USE OF SAME WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. IS PROHIBITED. 2016 RACETRAC PETROLEUM INC. COPYRIGHT NOTICE DESIGN PROFESSIONALS RaceTrac RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. 3225 CUMBERLAND BOULEVARD SUITE 100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30339 (770) 431-7600 PROJECT NAME RACETRAC STORE NUMBER PROTOTYPE SERIES 5.5K PLAN MODIFICATION NOTICE SPB NO.DATE STANDARD PLAN BULLETINS (SPB) MODIFY THE PROTOTYPE SERIES SET NOTED ABOVE. THE LISTED SPB REPRESENTS THE LATEST MODIFICATION INCORPORATED TO THIS PROTOTYPE SERIES SET AT ORIGINAL RELEASE. THE ISSUE/ REVISION RECORD COLUMN ABOVE LISTS ANY REVISIONS OR SPB INCORPORATED IN THIS SET AFTER THE ORIGINAL RELEASE. CONTACT RACETRAC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION FOR ANY SUBSEQUENT BULLETINS NOT INCORPORATED HEREIN. PROFESSIONAL SEAL PROJECT NUMBER SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER ® RaceTrac® 9/13/17 PRELIMINARY PACKAGE 3638 WEST GALLOWAY DRIVE RICHFIELD, OH 44286 PHONE: (330-802-6265) SHAWDOWLAWN FLORIDA #1266 2017 EF-LH-SV-M 0603 2017157.68 08.15.170603 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PLAN A010 NAPLES TAMIAMI TRAIL & SHADOWLAWN AVE 3/8" = 1'-0"1 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PLAN 3/8" = 1'-0"4 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 3/8" = 1'-0"3 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 3/8" = 1'-0"2 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE REAR ELEVATION 3/8" = 1'-0"5 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION AWNING AW-1 -ALUMINUM AWNING SELECTED BY RACETRAC CAST STONE CS-1 CONTINENTAL CAST STONE OR APPROVED OTHER MATCH BORAL TUSCAN LINTEL CHAMPAGNE COLOR 1102 NATURAL STONE; MORTAR COLOR "LIGHT BUFF" EIFS EF-1 STO STO THERM CI "FINE FINISH" APPLICATION; COLOR TO MATCH SW #6113 "INTERACTIVE CREAM" EF-2 STO STO THERM CI "FINE FINISH" APPLICATION; COLOR TO MATCH SW #6094 "SENSATIONAL SAND" GLAZING GL-5 1-5/16" IMPACT RATED INSULATED LAMINATED GLAZING CLIMATE ZONES 1 OR 2: IGU 0.28 U-FACTOR, SHGC PF>0.5 = 0.27 (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED 70XL LOW-E #2 + 1/2" AIR + 1/4" CLEAR + 0.90 SG + 1/4" CLEAR) OR APPROVED ALTERNATE GL-7 1-5/16" IMPACT RATED ACID ETCHED INSULATED GLAZING CLIMATE ZONES 1 OR 2: IGU 0.28 U-FACTOR, SHGC PF>0.5 = 0.27 (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED 70XL LOW-E #2 + 1/2" AIR + 1/4" CLEAR SATIN ETCHED #3 + 0.90 SG + 1/4" CLEAR) OR APPROVED ALTERATE METAL M-1 PREFINISHED4" 2-PIECE COMPRESSION METAL COVER METAL TO MATCH STOREFRONT COLOR DRAK BRONZE M-2 COLOR DARK BRONZE. METAL TO MATCH STOREFRONT COLOR DARK BRONZE M-3 VISTAWALL (OR APPROVED ALTERNATE) FG-5000 STOREFRONT SYSTEM (OR APPROVED ALTERNATE) PREFINISHED DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM AA-MI2C22A44 M-5 REYNOBOND METAL TO MATCH STOREFRONT; COLOR DARK BRONZE. M-7 BORAL TRUEXTERIOR DOUBLE-4 BEADBOARD PAINT INTERACTIVE CREAM PAINT EP-1 SHERWIN WILLIAMS EXTERIOR PAINT TO MATCH DARK BRONZE EP-2 SHERWIN WILLIAMS EXTERIOR PAINT AS SELECTED BY RACETRAC PAINT AS SELECTEC BY RACETRAC FOR SLAT WALL METAL SUPPORTS ROOFING DURO DUROLAST 50 MIL MEMBRANE ROOFING SYSTEM WHITE; MECHANICALLY FASTENED STACKED STONE SS-1 BORAL ASPEN COUNTRY LEDGESTONE WET STACK APPLICATION. MORTAR COLOR "LIGHT BUFF" STONE BAND SB-1 BORAL TUSCAN LINTEL CHAMPAGNE MORTAR COLOR "LIGHT BUFF" WOOD SLATS WS-1 COMPACTWOOD 1/2" THICKNESS WALNUT QC "CW-QCWAL-S-0410-12 --EXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEDULE T.O. SLAB 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 21' - 2" T.O. ROOF 25' - 0"M-5M-5M-5EF-1EF-1M-1SB-1EF-1M-5M-5M-5EF-1EF-2EF-2WS-133 3 7 19 15 10 16 15 16 2 2M-1M-1M-5M-5EF-1GL-5GL-5M-3M-3WS-1GL-5M-3SS-1WS-1EF-2EF-2EF-2EF-1EF-1SS-1 SB-1 SS-1 SB-1 SS-1 T.O. SLAB 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 21' - 2" T.O. ROOF 25' - 0"SS-1EF-2EF-1EF-1EF-2EF-2M-1SS-1EF-2M-5EF-1M-5M-5WS-13 3337 16 19 1 15 M-1M-5GL-5EF-1M-3M-5M-5M-1M-1EF-2EF-1EF-1SS-1SB-1SS-1SB-1WS-1 GL-5 M-3 T.O. SLAB 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 21' - 2" T.O. ROOF 25' - 0"M-5M-5EP-1EP-1SS-1EF-2EF-1EF-1EF-2EF-2M-1M-2EP-1EF-1EP-1M-2EP-1M-2WS-11 15 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 10 10 10 13 14 1 19 20 21 21 21 8 M-1M-5GL-5M-5SB-1SS-1M-5M-5M-1M-5EP-1EP-12222 T.O. SLAB 0' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 21' - 2" T.O. ROOF 25' - 0"M-5EP-1M-5M-3M-5EF-2SS-1EF-1SS-1GL-5SS-1EF-2AW-1EF-1EF-1EF-2EF-2M-1SS-1M-3GL-5AW-1EF-1SS-1SS-1M-5EF-1EF-1EF-2EF-2EP-1GL-7WS-1GL-5445 7 8 8 10 10 1112 12 1 1 18 3 3 3 3 3 10 15 1 15 GL-5M-3SB-1EP-1M-5M-5M-5M-1M-5EF-1SS-1EF-2SS-1WS-1 GL-5 SB-1 SS-1 AW-1AW-1ELEVATION SIGNAGE DIMENSIONS RT PARALLELOGRAM 13'-5/8" x 3'-0"FRONT LEFT RIGHT AREA 40 SF 42 SFBANNER RT PARALLELOGRAM 7'-8" x 5'-6" 13'-5/8" x 3'-0" 7'-8" x 5'-6" 42 SF 40 SF BANNER MATERIAL % OF ELEVATION STONE EIFS 24% 30% GLAZING METAL WOOD 25% 10% 11% FRONT ELEVATION 2,378 TOTAL SF SQ. FOOT. 585 716 594 228 255 MATERIAL % OF ELEVATION STONE EIFS 15% 47% GLAZING METAL WOOD 12% 17% 9% LEFT ELEVATION 1,304 TOTAL SF SQ. FOOT. 191 607 157 233 116 MATERIAL % OF ELEVATION STONE EIFS 31% 55% GLAZING METAL WOOD 2% 11% 1% REAR ELEVATION 2,291 TOTAL SF SQ. FOOT. 713 1,258 56 247 17 MATERIAL % OF ELEVATION STONE EIFS 32% 51% GLAZING METAL WOOD 0% 3% 14% RIGHT ELEVATION 1,219 TOTAL SF SQ. FOOT. 386 624 0 31 178 3/16" = 1'-0"1 LEFT ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"2 RIGHT ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"3 REAR ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"4 FRONT ELEVATION Mark S. Salopek, LLC DATE DESCRIPTION ISSUE/REVISION RECORD THESE PLANS ARE SUBJECT TO FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS: ANY USE OF SAME WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. IS PROHIBITED. 2016 RACETRAC PETROLEUM INC. COPYRIGHT NOTICE DESIGN PROFESSIONALS RaceTrac RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. 3225 CUMBERLAND BOULEVARD SUITE 100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30339 (770) 431-7600 PROJECT NAME RACETRAC STORE NUMBER PROTOTYPE SERIES 5.5K PLAN MODIFICATION NOTICE SPB NO.DATE STANDARD PLAN BULLETINS (SPB) MODIFY THE PROTOTYPE SERIES SET NOTED ABOVE. THE LISTED SPB REPRESENTS THE LATEST MODIFICATION INCORPORATED TO THIS PROTOTYPE SERIES SET AT ORIGINAL RELEASE. THE ISSUE/ REVISION RECORD COLUMN ABOVE LISTS ANY REVISIONS OR SPB INCORPORATED IN THIS SET AFTER THE ORIGINAL RELEASE. CONTACT RACETRAC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION FOR ANY SUBSEQUENT BULLETINS NOT INCORPORATED HEREIN. PROFESSIONAL SEAL PROJECT NUMBER SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER ® RaceTrac® 9/13/17 PRELIMINARY PACKAGE 3638 WEST GALLOWAY DRIVE RICHFIELD, OH 44286 PHONE: (330-802-6265) SHAWDOWLAWN FLORIDA #1266 2017 EF-LH-SV-M 0603 2017157.68 08.15.170603 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 300 NAPLES TAMIAMI TRAIL & SHADOWLAWN AVE--EXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEDULE AWNING AW-1 -ALUMINUM AWNING SELECTED BY RACETRAC CAST STONE CS-1 CONTINENTAL CAST STONE OR APPROVED OTHER MATCH BORAL TUSCAN LINTEL CHAMPAGNE COLOR 1102 NATURAL STONE; MORTAR COLOR "LIGHT BUFF" EIFS EF-1 STO STO THERM CI "FINE FINISH" APPLICATION; COLOR TO MATCH SW #6113 "INTERACTIVE CREAM" EF-2 STO STO THERM CI "FINE FINISH" APPLICATION; COLOR TO MATCH SW #6094 "SENSATIONAL SAND" GLAZING GL-5 1-5/16" IMPACT RATED INSULATED LAMINATED GLAZING CLIMATE ZONES 1 OR 2: IGU 0.28 U-FACTOR, SHGC PF>0.5 = 0.27 (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED 70XL LOW-E #2 + 1/2" AIR + 1/4" CLEAR + 0.90 SG + 1/4" CLEAR) OR APPROVED ALTERNATE GL-7 1-5/16" IMPACT RATED ACID ETCHED INSULATED GLAZING CLIMATE ZONES 1 OR 2: IGU 0.28 U-FACTOR, SHGC PF>0.5 = 0.27 (1/4" CLEAR TEMPERED 70XL LOW-E #2 + 1/2" AIR + 1/4" CLEAR SATIN ETCHED #3 + 0.90 SG + 1/4" CLEAR) OR APPROVED ALTERATE METAL M-1 PREFINISHED4" 2-PIECE COMPRESSION METAL COVER METAL TO MATCH STOREFRONT COLOR DRAK BRONZE M-2 COLOR DARK BRONZE. METAL TO MATCH STOREFRONT COLOR DARK BRONZE M-3 VISTAWALL (OR APPROVED ALTERNATE) FG-5000 STOREFRONT SYSTEM (OR APPROVED ALTERNATE) PREFINISHED DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM AA-MI2C22A44 M-5 REYNOBOND METAL TO MATCH STOREFRONT; COLOR DARK BRONZE. M-7 BORAL TRUEXTERIOR DOUBLE-4 BEADBOARD PAINT INTERACTIVE CREAM PAINT EP-1 SHERWIN WILLIAMS EXTERIOR PAINT TO MATCH DARK BRONZE EP-2 SHERWIN WILLIAMS EXTERIOR PAINT AS SELECTED BY RACETRAC PAINT AS SELECTEC BY RACETRAC FOR SLAT WALL METAL SUPPORTS ROOFING DURO DUROLAST 50 MIL MEMBRANE ROOFING SYSTEM WHITE; MECHANICALLY FASTENED STACKED STONE SS-1 BORAL ASPEN COUNTRY LEDGESTONE WET STACK APPLICATION. MORTAR COLOR "LIGHT BUFF" STONE BAND SB-1 BORAL TUSCAN LINTEL CHAMPAGNE MORTAR COLOR "LIGHT BUFF" WOOD SLATS WS-1 COMPACTWOOD 1/2" THICKNESS WALNUT QC "CW-QCWAL-S-0410-12 1 WALL MOUNTED SECURITY CAMERA. 2 3" SQUARE DOWNSPOUT. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR CONNECTIONS. 3 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT BEYOND 4 REFER TO DETAILS FOR CAST STONE SHAPES. 5 HOSE BIBB; REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS. 6 CEILING FAN; REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS. 7 ILLUMINATED SIGN PANEL BY OWNER; PAINT SUPPORT STRUCTURE EP-1. 8 BRONZE BREAK METAL WRAP AT WINDOW JAMB, TYPICAL. 9 ROOFING MEMBRANE TO BE RUN UP CLERESTORY TO UNDERSIDE OF WINDOW. REFER TO WALL SECITONS. 10 ACM PANEL REVEAL LINE. REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS. 11 NOT USED. 12 EMERGENCY FUEL SHUT OFF SWITCH. MOUNT TOP OF SIGN AT 50" A.F.F. 13 LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE C/T AND METER. 14 GENERATOR TAP BOX - SEE ELECTRICAL FOR LOCATION. 15 SECURITY CAMERA MOUNTED TO PATIO FASCIA. 16 OVERFLOW SPILL SCUPPER. 18 PACKAGE PASSER. REFER TO EQUIPMENT PLAN. 19 SPILL SCUPPER. REFER TO DETAIL. 20 PROVIDE METAL GUARD GATE AT LADDER TO 8' AFF WITH LOCKING HASP 21 4'-0" WIDE x 1'-7" HIGH SCUPPER. REFER TO DETAILS ON SHEET A201. 22 STOP STONE 6" BEFORE ROUGH OPENING --ELEVATION KEY NOTES A300 "RED" COLOR CALLOUT CANOPY MANUFACTURER STANDARD COLOR SPECIFICATION LANE CANOPIES McGEE CANOPIES MADISON CANOPIES TRD RED FASCIA TRD RED FASCIA PROGRAM RED FASCIA "TAN" LANE CANOPIES McGEE CANOPIES MADISON CANOPIES ETT TAN FASCIA ETT TAN FASCIA PUEBLO TAN FASCIA STANDARD CANOPY FASCIA COLOR SPECIFICATION CHART C9 C9 C8 C8 C7 C7 C6 C6 C5 C5 C4 C4 C3 C3 C2 C2 C1 C1 CACA CBCB 2 1 2 1 FT-4 C100E 4 C100E 3 15' - 2"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"15' - 2"13' - 6"13' - 0"13' - 6"40' - 0"246' - 4" ?TAN TAN TANTAN EP-1 5' - 0"EF-1 EF-2 SS-1 246' - 4" FT-4 SS-1 EF-2 EF-1 5' - 0"TANTAN TAN EP-14' - 0"SEE SITE PLAN FOR EXACT HEIGHT18' - 0" CLEAR MINIMUM1' - 6"1' - 0"1' - 6"40' - 0" Mark S. Salopek, LLC DATE DESCRIPTION ISSUE/REVISION RECORD THESE PLANS ARE SUBJECT TO FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS: ANY USE OF SAME WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. IS PROHIBITED. 2016 RACETRAC PETROLEUM INC. COPYRIGHT NOTICE DESIGN PROFESSIONALS RaceTrac RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. 3225 CUMBERLAND BOULEVARD SUITE 100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30339 (770) 431-7600 PROJECT NAME RACETRAC STORE NUMBER PROTOTYPE SERIES 5.5K PLAN MODIFICATION NOTICE SPB NO.DATE STANDARD PLAN BULLETINS (SPB) MODIFY THE PROTOTYPE SERIES SET NOTED ABOVE. THE LISTED SPB REPRESENTS THE LATEST MODIFICATION INCORPORATED TO THIS PROTOTYPE SERIES SET AT ORIGINAL RELEASE. THE ISSUE/ REVISION RECORD COLUMN ABOVE LISTS ANY REVISIONS OR SPB INCORPORATED IN THIS SET AFTER THE ORIGINAL RELEASE. CONTACT RACETRAC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION FOR ANY SUBSEQUENT BULLETINS NOT INCORPORATED HEREIN. PROFESSIONAL SEAL PROJECT NUMBER SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER ® RaceTrac® 9/13/17 PRELIMINARY PACKAGE 3638 WEST GALLOWAY DRIVE RICHFIELD, OH 44286 PHONE: (330-802-6265) SHAWDOWLAWN FLORIDA #1266 2017 EF-LH-SV-M 0603 2017157.68 08.15.170603 FUEL CANOPY PLANS AND ELEVATIONS C100E NAPLES TAMIAMI TRAIL & SHADOWLAWN AVE FUEL CANOPY MATERIAL LEGEND 3/32" = 1'-0"5 CANOPY PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0"4 CANOPY FRONT ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"3 CANOPY LEFT ELEVATION ID MANUF. MATERIAL COMMENTS EIFS EF-1 STO STO THERM CI "FINE FINISH" APPLICATION; COLOR TO MATCH SW #6113 "INTERACTIVE CREAM" EF-2 STO STO THERM CI "FINE FINISH" APPLICATION; COLOR TO MATCH SW #6094 "SENSATIONAL SAND" FASCIA RED -REFER TO SPECIFICATION CHART ON SHEET 100 WHITE -8" WHITE STRIPE PAINT EP-1 SHERWIN WILLIAMS EXTERIOR PAINT TO MATCH DARK BRONZE STACKED STONE SS-1 BORAL ASPEN COUNTRY LEDGESTONE WET STACK APPLICATION. MORTAR COLOR "LIGHT BUFF" STONE BAND SB-1 BORAL TUSCAN LINTEL CHAMPAGNE MORTAR COLOR "LIGHT BUFF" TILE FT-4 EMSER ALCHEMY IN COPPER 6"x6"; FROM VENDOR 12"X24" TO BE CUT DOWN TO 6"X6" BY INSTALLER INDIVIDUAL TILES LAID STRAIGHT WITH 1/4" SPACING; GROUT MERKRETE PROGROUT #00145 "MOCHA" December 19, 2017 Fred Reischl, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Auto Service Station Waiver PL20170003579 2nd submittal Mr. Reischl: In regards to the above referenced project, the following items have been submitted electronically. Attached, please find a single hard copy of each item for your records: 1. One (1) copy of the Cover Letter; 2. One (1) copy of the Owner Authorizations; 3. One (1) copy of the Owner Beneficiaries information; 4. One (1) copy of the revised Boundary Survey prepared by Metron Surveying & Mapping, LLC; 5. One (1) copy of Market Analysis; 6. One (1) CD containing pdf’s of submittal items. In response to the comment letter dated November 14, 2017, please find the following responses in order as received: ZONING REVIEW Comment 1 Please supply a Market Study as required. Response 1 See enclosed Market Study. COUNTY ATTORNEY REVIEW Comment 1 In accordance with the LDC, please provide a market study analysis which justifies a need for the additional facility with fuel pumps in the desired location. Response 1 See enclosed Market Study. Comment 2 Please provide an Affidavit of Authorization OR written evidence of consent to this application from each property owner. Response 2 See enclosed Authorizations. Comment 3 Please have staff confirm that your measurement should be to the existing gas station parcel at the southeast corner of US 41/Shadowlawn, and NOT the vacant gas station parcel at the southwest corner. Response 3 The applicant has confirmed with the staff the measurement as previously shown is correct. Comment 4 Please provide a list of any beneficiaries, shareholders or those with an equitable interest in all of the property owners, and RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc. Response 4 See enclosed Beneficiaries List. Note: the owner of the ABC Property would not provide the requested information. The attached letter from RaceTrac Counsel describes this issue further. Comment 5 Additional comments may follow after resubmittal. Response 5 Acknowledged. If you require any additional information, please contact our office at (239) 418-0691. Sincerely, DELISI FITZGERALD, INC. John T. Wojdak, P.E. Vice President Project No.: 21442 cc: Tom Hardy with attachments October 6, 2017 Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Gas Station Distance Waiver Application To Whom It May Concern: Attached for approval, please find the following items as they relate to the above referenced project: 1. Six (6) copies of the Cover Letter; 2. One (1) check in the amount of $1,500.00 for the Application Fees; 3. One (1) check in the amount of $500.00 for the Legal Advertising Fees; 4. Six (6) copies of the Completed Application (folio numbers and addresses attached); 5. Two (2) copies of Completed Addressing Checklist; 6. Six (6) copies of the Pre-Application Meeting Notes; 7. Six (6) copies of the email from Fred Reischl regarding Pre-App Waiver; 8. Three (3) signed and notarized Affidavit of Authorization Forms; 9. Six (6) copies of Project Narrative; 10. Six (6) copies of the Parcel Information & Location Map; 11. Six (6) copies of the Legal Description; 12. Six (6) 11” x 17” copies of the Aerial & Adjacent Uses Exhibit; 13. Three (3) copies of Warranty Deeds; 14. Six (6) copies of Market Analysis (to be submitted under separate cover); 15. Six (6) 24” x 36” sets of Color Architectural Elevations; 16. Six (6) signed and sealed sets of Landscape Plans prepared by DMJA ; 17. Two (2) 11” x 17” copies of the Site Plan; 18. Six (6) 24” x 36” copies of the Site Plan; 19. Two (2) CDs containing pdf’s of submittal items. If you require any additional information, please contact our office at (239) 418-0691. Sincerely, DELISI FITZGERALD, INC. John T. Wojdak, P.E. Vice President Project No.: 21442 cc: Tom Hardy with attachments C-ounty COTTIER COUNW GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANA6EMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierggv.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FLORIDA 34104 l2t9l2'2-Z4OO Pre-Application Meeting Notes Petition Type:DR Date and Time. July 25, 2017 at 3:00 Assig ned planner: Fred Reischl, AICP Engineering Manager (for PPIJs and FP's): Project lnformation Proj ect Name: RaceTrac Facility with Fuel Pumps PL*.20170002552 Property lD #:61834720003 +Current Zoning . C-4-GTMUD-MXD City . Naples state: FL zip: - Project Address:Shadowlawn & US41 Applicant:RaceTrac Ag ent Name: John Wojdak, PE Phone .239-418-0691 Agent/Firm Address: Delisi Fitzgerald city: Fort MYers state: FL zip: _ Property ownerr frlsc' Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: N/A iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: _ iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: v. lf there is an ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. lf the project is within a plat, provide the name and AR#/pL#: t t Crwn w Z8(x) NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPIES, FLORIDA 34104 1239l.Z'2-24OO Meeting Notes Fttz .'?/@trfr-ot^/re=7-6;-Za 13 r .4s.e6+ =/rAZ- 5t+alzt-.J 6- fu4ps ?ottgV6VaaT ltrD 8*zar.ta-_f . ruzx- /,?r* ltt*9 - ct,nf cryfi. F,+( ,rfq 4f</,hp.r' frO 4-ffi1 or' ,-Er; 1:11.. A |-FFF\. f*,",,t Aic r PchJ L/ d- NX Ai 1o1y,41fi A*fF--n rty'6/4 Iftr{r ,,tt 1;-f cetuql 5t ). B-fifE"t -4q ,tc lz.t-Q-, aF.1 (h ,trtl='fEa- p. /+lc r ,1 u-frr-* Fr\. A+<-F-zlac , Atf-.a w..'d Ea Pr*P C+tc, nl f-Xcf{FtZ P-rtt ,lcat\ I it t ^/ C t--nF-n t,J Vvq Laytt fc,+f F C4Laf . -'/ / at. n 0/- 7/J h €<.// €va/u,lL 4,/a t't d Arrazt*"nd -"c/ Trr LO*t\R oL'l la I d r /, ua ,:LL t-rbo updated 7 /L9/2077 Page l3of5 COLTIER COUNTY 6OVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov,net Disclaimer: lnformation provided by staff to applicant duing the pre-Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could aise duing fhe process. The Administrctive code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applicafions mus, satlsry. Any checktists provided of required data .for an applicatlon may not fully outline what is needed. lt is the applicant's responsibiility toprovide all rcquired data. t C-OUvtw Z8OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FLORIDA 34104 12391252-Z4OO Meeting Notes Drsfa uc€tveR Di77hD €OOe'r oF rEx-d(b C-H ,o5.otr 5,o5. o t;s.S -H,L\<- ,oL, I ra\|EE{A Y A?R-IES. t rFf 4 ht<rY,o J.XrrPr c/A<\o^-)-fon- \eVrA-r-rar-lS. Page l2of5 COLTIER COUNW GOVERNMENT 6ROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net L u pdated 7 /L9/2077 r C-rwmw Pre-Application Meeting Sign-ln Sheet PL# aotT oOO a ssa Collier County Contact lnformation: Name Review Discipline Phone Email !David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net !Summer Araque 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and ReSulatory Management 252-5887 claudineauclair@colliergov.net d Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2367 stephenbaluch@colliergov.net f Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring lauriebeard@colliergov.net !Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craigbrown@colliergov.net x Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 h eidiashton@colliergov.net I John Degtasis Zoning Services / Planning Tech 252-1050 johndeblasis@colliergov.net fi Kay Deselem Zoning Services 252-2s86 kaydeselem@colliergov.net ! Date Fey North Collier Fire 597-9227 dfey@northcollierf ire.com I Eric Fey, P.E Utility Planning 252-7037 ericfey@colliergov.net tr Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@collier gov.net ! Paula Fleishman lmpact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net !James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5771 jamesf rench@colliergov.net I Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons@colliergov.net !Storm Gewirtz, P.E Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 stormgewirtz@colliergov.net n Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancygundlach@collie rgov.net l Shar Hingson Greater Naples Fire District shingson@gnfire.org E John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 f Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodih hes@colliergov.net !Alicia Humphries Right-Of-Way Permitting 252-2326 ! Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Plannin 252-2387 ma rcia kenda ll@collier gov.net - Garrett Louviere, P.E 252-2526 rrettlouviere@collie rgov.net !Thomas Mastrobeno Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomasmastroberto@collier gov.net ! Jack McKenna, P.E.En ineering Services jackmckenna @collier net .R Matt McLean, P.E.Development Review 0irector matthewmclean @colli . net J Michele Mosca, AtCp - &pital Project Planning 252-2466 u pdated 7 /L9 /2017 Page l4of5 COTTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www,colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 12391Z'2-24OO Environmental Review 2s2-5782 774-2800 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net aliciahumphries@colliergov.net Transportation Planning 252-2977 252-8279 michelemosca@colliergov.net Co et C.wmty COLTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact lnformation : 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 12?9l.25?-24OO r'b7 Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net Stefanie Nawrocki Development Review - Zoning 252-2373 stefanienawrocki@colliergov.net - Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richardorth@colliergov.net Brandy Otero Translt 252-5859 bran dyotero@colliergov.net Utility lmpact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net X Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Division 252-4277 fredreischl@colliergov.net f Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 591-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com - Daniel Roman, P.E Engineering Utilities 252-2538 danielroman@colliergov.net L Brett Rosenblum, P.E Development Review Principal Project lvlanager 252-290s brettrosenblum@colliergov.net ffi tvtichaelsawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.netI!Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov. net E chris scott, AtcP Oevelopment Review - Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov, net f, Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 petershawinsky@colliergov.net Camden Smith Zoning Division Operations ca mdensm ith @ colliergov.netxScott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-5740 scottstone@colliergov.net .! / Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net M Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 ma rktem p leton @ colliergov.net Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 sicavelasco@colliergov.net I Jon Walsh, P.E Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net E David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net !Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review kirstenwilkie@colli . net !Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning christinewillou ghby@colliergov.net Name Representing Phone Email @r/d S*r'cFz 6kffiZ y'h%Ee ftz ? a-|G^ /LO 3^e'G.-a*^r W c6;f m L 4lY oaqt I 1cgro"lA trAceowa.u f4arfivac WM updated 7 /L9/2077 Page l5of5 I I Brandi Pollard 252-1042 Jessica Velasco 252-5518 252-5748 , L frra- UrA\ho. S\".^,...'hrhn)Ocardcal-.r.Y C-ovmty P120170002552 Gro#th Managem ent Department Zoning Division PRE-APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Camden Smith STAFF FORM FOR SUPPTEMENTAT PRE-APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Agent to list for PL# RaceTrac Petroleum, lnc. - Applicant & Authorized Agent of Ex. Owners DeLisiFitzgerald, lnc. - Consultant/Agent to RaceTrac Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) > See Attached list. Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment Please list the density requests of the pro.iect, if applicable, and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply) and/or deviations the applicant is seeking: The two existing service stations and existing office will be redeveloped as a RaceTrac convenience store (5,411 square feet) with 18 fuel pumps. See Attached preliminary Site plan. Details about Project (choose type that applies): The pre-app request is for a Site w/ Deviations for Redevelopment. The deviations are predominantly for structure setbacks and buffers. RaceTrac wishes to redevelop two existing service stations along with the existing office to the north as a new convenience food and beverage use with fuel pumps. Supplemental lnformation provided by: Name John T, Wojdak, p.E. Title VP, DelisiFitzgerald, tnc. Email iohn@delisifitzserald.com Phone 239{18{691 Created April5, 2017 [ocation: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff tnformation ) Z(rIr! olirir . 280 t{afi ttcE€d'e etE . i@, Fbib 3410{ . 23$2OA2OO . ffryo s!n/.rEt Applicont/Agent moy olso send site pldhs ot conceptuol plons fot review in odvonce if desied. John T. Wojdak, P.E. DelisiFitzgerald, lnc. iohn@delisifitzserald.com 239-418-0691 Crwmty COTLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FTORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAx: (239) 252-53s8 SITE PI.AN WITH DEVIATIONS FOR REDEVETOPMENT IDC Section 10.02.03 F Ch. 6 I of the Administrative Code PRO.,ECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED To be completed by stoff APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s):John T. Wojdak, P.E. Address: 1605 Hendry Street City:Fort Myers FL ztP.33901 Telep 6on". (239) 418-0691 cell: N/A State: Fax: E-Mail Address: john@delisifitzgerald.com Name of Agent:John T. Wojdak, P.E. Firm. john@delisifi tzgerald.com Address: 1605 Hendry Street one: (239)418-0691 (gll; N/A ciry; Fort Myers state:FL ztP. 33901 Teleph t3x; N/A E-Mail Address: BE AWARE THAT COLTIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGTY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPTIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. CORRESPONDING SDP, SDPA, SIP INFORMATION PLANNER/PROJECT MANAGER, DATE OF SUBMITTAI: 4/7t/2077 lF KNOWN: Fred Reischt Page 1 of 4 This application shall be submitted in conjunction with one of the following: site development plan, site development plan amendment, or site improvement plan. PROJECT NAME/PL# lF KNOWN: laceTrac at Shadowlawn Drive i PL2o17ooo2552 C-,ou,nty COTIIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliersov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FI-ORIDA 34104 (2391 2s2-2400 FAx: (239) 252-63s8 INFORMATION REGARDING DEVIATION REqUESTS A site plan with deviations for redevelopment provides a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations (excluding height), architectural deviations, and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping, parking, and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings, structures, or site features nonconforming. A site plan with deviations may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan, site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03. Except for the requested deviations, the site plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03. In accordance with LDC section 10.02.03 F, "redevelopment" shall mean the renovation, restoration, or remodeling ofa building or structure, or required infrastructure, in whole or in part, where the existing buildings, structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. DEVITATION REQUESTS The application must address the follow requirements. Please attach the required narratives and explanations. l. A narrative of the redevelopment project and how it is consistent with the standards for approval, LOC section 10.02.03 F.7, 2. Description of each requested deviation and justification for each request. Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition. The LDC section for which the deviation seeks relief from shall be identified. 3. Proiect enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly identified on the site plan and explanation provided. 4. Deviation Request types: Zoning Deviation Requests - Check all that may be impacted by the request. Dimensional standards (excluding height) Parking Architectwal Landscape / Buffers Other site features: Engineering Deviation Requests - Check all that may be impacted by the request, Stormwater Pathways Transportation Planning Other site features: tr tr E tr tr tr tr tr tr 4/71/2077 Page 2 of 4 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Deviations The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the :r Crounty application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact ord attached to each section. lncomplete submittals will not be accepted. er list with cover sheets I SoAr^tffect ?otnCA *, ADDITIONAI. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: ' Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project mana8er. . Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of county commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEWCopGPfu,4L ( ,c,,*REQUIREO NOT REQUIRED Site Development Plan with Deviations for edevelo ment Application.9 d pleted 5DP/sDPA/SlP application and all associated aterials, includin all site n documents.9+V 1 w of Authorizati ned and notarizednst t/ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronical ly in PDF format n d Unl.ss w.iYcd by th. Projecr M@8.r 4/7t/2077 Page 3 of 4 COttIER COUNW GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierqov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLOR|DA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAx: (239) 2s2-63s8 tr ! Copy for the Pre-Application Notes, if not submitted with 'DP/SDPA/SIP C-outrty COTIIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT . coll .net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPTES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) zs2-2400 FAx: (239) 2s2-53s8 FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre-Application Meeting: S500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: S1,125.00 Site Plan for Redevelopment: S1,000.00 Fire Code Plons Review Fees ore collected ot the time of applicotion submission ond those t'ees ore set forth by the Authority hoving jurisdiction. The Lond Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification moilers for Applicotions headed to heoring, ond this fee is collected prior to hedrinq. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks poyoble to: Eodrd of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Zoning 0ivision ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 zr t7 nt Signature Date Printed Name tr tr tr 4/17/2017 Page 4 of 4 I) Parcel ID Address: Description Owner: 2) Parcel ID: Address: Description Owner: 3) Parcel ID Address: Description Owner: 4) Parcel ID: Address: Description Owner Dellsr FrrzeERALD, lNC, Plonhinq - Eogit@dng - proiea nonoOenent Project Description & Location Map 61834720003 2891 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 341l2 NG+TCLFNO 211 50 25 COMM NE CNR OF LOT 36, S 1510.20FT, W SFT TO POB, W 137.85FT, S 92.07FT, SE ALONG N LINE OF TRAIL 149.96FT, N 38 DEG E ALG CURVE TO LEFT 33.96FT, N 160.13FT TO POB, LESS STIPUIATED ORDER OF TAKING CASE NO. 95.1010.CA OR 2403 PG 2369 SHADOWLAWN DEVELOPMENT 1 TRUST 6183468000.1 2887 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 N G+TC LF#2 FROMTHENECNROF LOT36, N GTC LF#2 S 1237.70FT,s 89 DEG W 5 FT TO POB, S 272.44FT,S 89 DEG W 138.05FT, S IO:].62F-|, N 5I DEGW 73.2TFT, N 329.70FT, N 89 DEG E 196FT TO POB, LESS STIPT,'LATED ORDER OF TAKING CASE NO. 95-I 302-CA PALUMBO TR, ROSEMARIE D d,/b/a SHADOWIAWN DEVELOPMENT 1 TRUST 26 780080007 2795 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 341 12 COL.LEE-CO COURT BEG AT SE COR OF LOT.THENCE WITH NE R,/W LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL N 5I DEG 58 MIN W 2OOFT, N 38 DEG 02 MIN E I25FT, N 75 DEG 46 MIN E 2OFT, S 49 DEG 49MIN E SOFT TO E LINE LOT ], S 175FT TO POB LESS ORDER OF TAKING CASE # 94.1749CA PARCEL 127 DESC IN OR 2!IO3 PG 2:]76 GUTIERREZ, JAIME A 2757 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 3.1I12 COL-LEE-CO COURT LOTS I + 2, BEG SW CNR LOT 35 NG&TCLR #2, SELY ALG R,Atr TAMTAMI TRL 18OFT, NLY 2OOFT, NWLY 18OFT TO PT W LINE LOT 35, SLY zOOFT POB LESS R/W & LESS OR 1157 PG 1403, LESS ORDER OF TAKING CASE #95-76.1-CA PAR NO I26 ABC PROPERTIES LTD 1605 Hendry Street . Fort Myers, FL 33901 . 239-418-0691 . 239-418-0692 fax 26 780040005 (PART OF) I.I ! t', t I 1 I 1t t\ 6c 4 ou )., a I II I dl Ti ,.t ; L I \ t I { ll / I -.1.I !.' gf \ F ,T TL-'t5J =''r a6 I q. i I *1rs.. 9l:! ;ia3!6qE]"r.tU si60-3r9%-".o :,,--6-- @9 -,j',]a-loUz_ttr ,/ r..si'f,t o :."]t"./ ,,.' ..8 Al--=-vz R I, f \o\4..\g6ooeoooo!,oo,o o o a) I,t: I I il ..1 -fIr l'"6@@ot"E1r9o -. __L I1...',,1lIII I I\t+ 1.,..,l 1 I L d $iln'ttI B I a 8t E;Tc:: H6t q 4 E t € , I 6 t I o l^i i$l ;+. $&- "fa 't I 9' i i __L_J o ; \- 4A ,&, d l 46fl&.nt,i"i3IN)ct)eP,iln:elltn-,d-,A\VE sa = c.,, lffi _5'utl rl(t 1.{ N<) { I C o s h-a-d';ilt?-ffiD R N D! ) hJF. <r .)arts)E BIa V.slildHs,] N)o,(,6 1try)aN)t.;IE;BB,l f AJN(rt (o t o7{,\.ififta-)rLi r;l .)).,]DEltiIs.t rr j f I\I' -:?tti' Irt. '/I \ 7),-n!t t,atYa9EId-*tEr.ls,ruIyjoA,==-=.o rc ,YH _) 0 tl,/ttq{B\NI B I :"4* ! Ila r G(,l I &, lm nrlrr,tr ,tr.i 1l H BE qqI;D 7 b. T rtr Hl9r , t a N(, (O(rl =rrmI q)o C nm t_r _tI 3 I L FA I ffi nsr g' H,E 7 o BI 16r-{3 o o = a =-t1 T)s C"'5 G ,it -a ,1I t^ -.1 rJ t\)() o, n I\Jt- (O a , a,ai m9.)C oU'.U l N (o O) N -5 a,3 a t,n ll t. IH f r t 7 I H; U t' From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: John Wojdak <John@delisifitzgerald.com > Friday, )uly 2t, 20L7 3:28 PM ReischlFred; thardy@racetrac.com; Drew Fitzgerald; Richard Yovanovich SmithCamden; BellowsRay; BosiMichael RE: 41 - Shadowlawn Good afternoon Fred, There is an existing facility with fuel pumps diagonally across the intersection. With Tuesdays pre-app, we'd like to initiate the Site Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment process. We wanted to get down the road with that a bit before filing the SDP & Waiver. John John T. Wojdak, P.E. Deltst FrrzceRnlD, lNc. Phnning - Engl/n,eering - Holfr Mo|,dge',,eat L605 Hendry Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 P: (239) 418-0691 F: (239) 418-0692 c: (239) s6s-3077 iohn@delisifi tzserald.com www.delisifi tzqerald.com From: ReischlFred Imailto:FredReischl@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, )uly 21, 2017 7:03 PM To: thardy@racetrac.com; Drew FiEgerald; John Wojdak; Richard yovanovich Cc: Smithcamden; BellowsRay; BosiMichael Subject: 41 - Shadowlawn Good afternoon! I was just assigned the Facility with Fuel Pumps. Judging by the team, it is RaceTrac. The pre-app says SDP with oeviations, however, it will also need an ASW since it is across 41 from Texaco, right? Thanks- Fred fial {"aol,l,arce Principal Planner 239-252-421L 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 rersov.netwww.coll C'-,oiu.>tty 1 SmithCamden From: sent: TO: su bj ect FW pL20170002552 (SDp) DIRECTION FROM CHRrS SCOTT EMAIL.txt wi 1 1 ough bych ri sti neFriday, July 21, 2017 1:51 P[4 ne.i schl rred; smi thcamden FW: P120170002 5 52 (SDP) Importance: Hi gh From: Scottch ri ssent: Friday, )uly 2I, 2017 11:01 AraTo: GMD cl i ent Servi ces <cMDcl i entservi ces@col I i ergov. net> ; Bel lowsRay <RayBel I owsGcol l i erqov. net> ; wi l l oughbych ri sti ne <chii sti newi'l I ouqhblGcol 1i e igov . neticc: McLeanMatthew <t4atthewMc Lean@col I i e rgov . net> subj ect: RE: P120170002552 (SDP) Importance: Hi gh Ray : r spoke with_the applicant (lohn with oelisi ritzgerald) on this requested pre-app. tte is actualiy seeking aSite Plan with Deviations for Redevelopment projects (DR) at this time, which meansthi s should be changed in cityview and assigned to one of your staff members. They are hoping togo through the DR process and get deviations approved prior to going through the expense of pr-eparing tu I I Enqr neerr nq pl ans (Sop). - christopher o. scott, Arcp, LEED-AP Planning t4anager - Development Review 239.252.2460 How are we doing? please cLrcK HERE to fill out a customer survey. we apprec iate your Feedbackl -----ori gi nal Appoi ntment----- From: CDS-CSent: wednesday, luly 19, 2OL7 8:12 AM To:, cDS-c; :ohn wojdak; wi 1loughbychristine; Ahmadvicky; Alcornchris; Amy Loc kha rt -ray1 o r ;AnthonyDavid; arnoldl,lichelle; AshtonHeidi; nucl a i rcl audi ne ; Baluchstephen; Bea rdLau ri e; BeasleyRachel; BrownA raquesumme r ; Browncraig; cascioceorge; CondominaDanny;crotteauKathynel I ; crowl eytti chael I e; oavid ogilvie; DeBlasiislohn; DeselemKay; dfey@northcol 1i erfi re. coml oumai sl,ti ke; Faul.knersue ; reyeri c ; Fl e i shmanpaul a ; Gewi rtzstorm; Gi bl i ncormac ; Gossel i nLi z ;Gundl achNancv : t-iouldsworth:6hn; Hughes:odi; HumphriesAl .icia; :acobrisa; j nageond@sfwmd . gov; J ohn son E ri c;Kendall[4arcia; rulakeatricia; KurtzGerald; LevyMichael; lmartin@sfwmd.gov;Louvi erecarrett; Martinezoscar; I'tas t robe rtoThomas ; Mccaught ryl4a ry ; McKennaJack; [4cKuenElly;McLeanMatthew; l40scatvti chel e; voxamannis; trtawrocki stefani e; orthnichafd; pajercraig; pattersonAmy; PepinEmily; p] iT:lga9: lyTd . gov ; pochma raNatal i e ; neischlrred; Rodriguezwanda; nomanoaniel; ROS e nb IumBrett: santabarbaraci no: sawverMi chael ; scottchri s; shawi nskypeter; shawn Hanson;SheaBarbara; page 1 FW PL20170002552 (SDp) DTRECTTON FROM CHRrS SCOTT EMAIL,txt Smithcamden; SmithDaniel; Stonescott; StrainMark; SuleckiAlexandra; SummersEllen; Sweetchad; ScottTami; TempletonMark; VanLengenKris; Velascolessica; WalshJonathan; WeeksDavid; wi c khamr l an ne ry subj ect: P120170002 5 52 (sDP) when: Tuesday, )u1y 25, 20L7 3:OO Pr4-4:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (uS & Canada). Where: conference Room c Pl anner: chri sti ne willoughby Fi re District: Greater Naples Project Description: to construct a 5,411 5F convenience store with 18 self-serve fue l pumps Parcel: 26780080007, 61834680004, 61834720003, and 26780040005 under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public reconds. rf you do not want your e-mai I address rel easedin response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead, contact thi s of f i ce by tel ephone oli n wri ti ng . Page 2 t RZ -1 i 4 5 9 q oo T.ta a)oCz -.,] o4I I I_.1:o =l!"F': o EEE t: l= l: .:"3*.>is+ ->u9=_D=>oz E gt P T, c r! R 6! E E: ,2-; B: ! Ei p:q E fii tl::c; ESEiitE;E iillES€3:ri-Er!!n.-------- l lal0 iiErt IFFE i;33s;5 d..........".-.;3!t !a i"t s!c"s a.!i;E ii iE;!fliriEI;rl9!!irl tlh;a -t3q d o k E a !Co 6 f, 6 =t ,qts x a 6 o I ! = 94 ;l I 6 4 F ;o_ 619P;Ei, I ,=1t(n Ez o 96 +; 6 ! BAYSDE STREEI o ii; q o-{ = f, =,o 1 il:t 05r2N 31: a tr---E:-:-_',]F:_l' ffi () .co o aPUD, 'o MXD, c{€TMUD+rXd Lr oootiilfu"sooo ;t^O0000 ,oov 0000 Y.Qo,""Q 0000088000 -C--aCoCCC E tr trtr ! D F tl Et]6C '6 {lt,o-Rl "" rlll :o_ TTTIIn MH,' t; Lr lt:I )'0RMF l'- It { RMF4(3) of =o To I I,l I ;-i I I I I I BUUD.Rl MH-"" UD.R1 //r Puo"'.. I rl 'i 0511N R F6- GTfUO- R F. nT-00 li ;r;i_!-i n 5 : I puo"'" puo"" R]I'F-6-BMUT}R2 !-L r!rl L1 !LrACCESSORY PAFIKING ZONE INOICATES CITY LIMITS INOICATES SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY \ COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TWP 50S RNG 25E SEC(S) 11 SO 1/2 0511S 6 i!!! iit llli ! iEI 7aa iit: !!gl r! t! tsl iiliiiir trr:!e: i:l i,!;i !-""i-r !igilr;.i !!ltrrlti I .t iliiii. I JI rl!" . " i !P! ! i r Ilr r r I iEI I I ' E fi!i!! SUBDIVISON INDEX ooooo!! a 6 t I ,1, 10 r11 Bq H t;t,t"t-- [_LLL THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A PAGE OF THE OFFICIAT ZONING ATLAS REFERREO TO ANO ADOPTED 8Y REFERENCE BY ORDINANCE NO, O'.41Of THE COUNTY OF COLLIER, FTORIDA, ADOPTED JUNE 22,2@', ASAMENOEO AY THE ZONING NOTES ANO SUBDIVISION INOEX REFERENCED HEREON 8Y-- --CHAIRMANATTEST CLERX ? I i COLL!ER COUNTY LDC 5.05.05 - Facilities with Fuel Pumps 'Ihe purpose of this section is to ensure that facilities with fuel pumps do not adversely irnpact adjacent land uses, especially residential land uses. The high levels of traffic, glare, and intensity of use associated with facilities with fuel pumps, particularly those open 24 hours, rnay be incornpatible with surounding uses, especially residential uses. Therefore, in the interest of protecting the health, safety, and general welfare of the public, the following regulations shall apply to the location, layout, drainage, operation, landscaping, parking, and permitted sales and service activities of facilities u,ith fuel pumps. Site design requirements Table of site design requirements Minimum dirnensions Site Standards Minirnum lot area (sq. ft.)30,000 Minirnulr lol width (fi.)150 Minin.rum lot depth (lt.)180 Separation liom adjacent facilities with fuel pumps (ft.) (based on distance between nearest poi[E 500 Mininum setbacks . all structurcs: Front yard (li. ) Side yard (ft.) Rear yard ( Ii. ) 50 40 ,10 Waiver of separation requirements T Thc BZA may, bv resolution, grant a waiver of part or all of the minirnurn separarion requirements set forth herein if it is demonstrated by the applicant and detemined by the BZA that the site proposed for development of a facility with fuel pumps is separated fiom another facilit_v $,ith fuel pumps by natural or man-made boundaries, structures , or other f'eatures which offset or limit the necessity for such rninimurn distance requirements. The BZA's decision to waive part or all ofthe distance requirements shall be ba.sed upon thc lbllorling factors: Whether the nature and type ofnatural or man-made boundary, structure, or other featurc lying between the proposed establishment and an existing facilitl with fuer pumps is detemrined by the BZA to lessen lhe impact ofthe proposed facility with fuel pumps . Such boundary, structure , or other feature may rnclude, but is not B. 2. 1. Whether the granting of the distance waiver will have an adverse impact on adjacent land uses, especially residential land uses. 1.l The Adrninistrative Code shall establish the subrnittal requirements for a facility with fuel pumps waiver request. The request lor a facility with fuel pumps waiver shall be based on the subnrittal of the required application, a site plan. and a written market study analysis rvhich.justifies a need for the additional facility with fuel pumps in lhe desired location. Additional condilions.'l'hc BZA shall have the right to add additional conditions or requirements to its approval of a distance waiver request in order to insure compatibility ol the facility rnith fuel pumps uith the surrounding area and the goals and objectives ofthe GMP. Building architecture, site design, lighting, and signage requirements. 1. Building architecture shall rneet the requirements ofLDC scctior -5.05.08 in addition to the following requirements: a. All structures on-site shall be of a consistent design and color scheme. b. Canopy standards: i. Columns must be at least eighteen (18) inches wide on all sides. ii. Under-canopy lighls must be fully recessed. lll Canopies must not be higher than sixteen (16) feet clear. c ll lll lv t\ lilniled to. iakes. :narshcs. nondcvelopable netlands, dcsignalcd preserve areas. ca:rals, arrd a rninirnuur o1'a 4-lanc arterial or collector right-of-lvay . Whcther the facility with fuel pumps is only engaged in the servicing of automobiles during regular. daytime business hours, or, ilin addition 1o or in lieu ofser-vicing. the facilitv u ith fuel pumps sells lbod, gasoline, and other conr.enience items during daytin.re, nighttimc, or on a 24 hour basis. Whether the facilit.r'- rvith fuel pumps is located within a shopping center prirnarily accesscd by a drivervay , or if it fronts on and is acccsscd directly frorn a platted road right-of-u a1 . Canopy standards. a) Canopy rools shall be consistent with the architectural design and leatures of the principal structure . b) The eave lascia olthe canopy shall be ofone (1) color, consistent witll the prcdominant color and scheme of the principal structure. Color accent banding C c) on canopy structures is peflnitted through the Deviations and Altemative Compliance proces s established in LDC scction -i.t)5.0E One of the following shall be applied to the canopy roof or eave fascia: i) Canopy roofs shall provide a slope ratio of 4: I 2 or higher. A rninimurn of two roof-edge or parapct line changes are required and shall create three distinct sections. One roof edge or parapet line change shall be provided for every 75 linear feet of the canopy length. Each change shall be a minimum of20 percent of the canopy length. ii) The eave fascia shall have a projection or recess with a minimum depth of three feet, and a minimum total width of 20 percent of the eave fascia length. One change is required for every 75 linear feet of the canopy length. See canopy signage standards in LDC-lcriqr 5.1)5.0-5 C.4;, below Site design standards. a A dumpster enclosure shall be provided as established in LDC se11i911.1Qi. Q! and irtegrated with the design and color scheme rr1'the facilit], with fuel pumps Trash receptacle(s) shall be provided at a convenient location on-site to facilitate litter control. All restrooms and A l Ms shall bc locatcd inside the principal structure Lighting standards All light Iixtures shall be dilccted away liom neighboring properties. On-site light fixtures shall not exceed a height greater than twenty (20) feet above finished grade. On-site luminaries shall be of low level, indirect diffuse type, and shall be between a minimum average of I .5 foot-candles and a maximum average of 5 foot-candles. b. 3 All light fixtures shall be full cutoff with flat lenses. Lighting located undemeath the canopy shall be recessed, of indirect diffuse type, and designed to provide light only to the purnp island areas located undemeath said canopy 4. Under-canopy lurninance shall be between a minimum average of 5 foot-candres and a maximum average of 20 foot-candles. 2. a. b. c. d. c. f. Signagc for facilities with fuel pumps. The lollowing are the only signs allowed in facilities with fuel pumps and convenience stores with fuel pumps. a. Window, Wall, and othcr signs: As allowed in [-DC,se ctiqr.5.0{..!!. b. An illuminated corporate logo with a maximum area of l2 square feet shall be allowed on a canopy face which is adjacent to a dedicated street or highway. Otherwise accent lighting and back lighting are prohibited on canopy structurcs. Color accent banding on canopies rnay be approved as established in LDC sqctiru 5.05.()5 C.l.b.iv.(b), above. One ground sign shall be pennitted for each site and shall be placed within a 200 square foot landscaped area. Height is limited so that the top edge of the sign face is less than eight feet above grade. Maximum permitted area 60 square feet. Said sign shall be consistent with the color scheme and architectural design of the principal structure. Signage is prohibited above fuel pumps Supplemental standards for facilities rvith fuel pumps within 250 feet ofresidential property. Facilities with fuel pumps shall be subject to the following standards when located within 250 feet of residentially zoned or residentially developed properties, hereinafter rel'erred to as "residential property," as measured from the property line ol the facilit"v rvith fuel pumps to the residential property line. However, a facility with fuel pumps shall be exempt from LDC scctjon -i.0-5.05 D when it is separated from residential property by a minimum of 100 feet ofdesignated preserve area that is 80 percent opaque and at least 12 feet in height within one year, or a minirnum 4lane arterial or collector right-of-way . L Setbacks. All structures shall provide a rrinimum 50-loot front, side, and rcar yard setback from residential property line(s). 2. Landscaping and masonry wall standards. a. Facility with fuel pumps sites shall be separated lrom residential property by a thirty (30) loot wide landscape buffer and an architecturally dcsigned rnasonry wall.'l'he masonry wall shall be eight (8) I'eet in height, centered within the landscape buffer, and shall use rnaterials similar in color. pattern, and texture to those utilized for the principal structur€. The masonry wall shall be located on top of a bcrm. 'l'he berm shall be constructed and rnaintained at a height of lhree (3) 1'eet and a tnaximum slope of 3:1 . The berm shall be planted with ground cover. b. I-andscaping shall be required on both sides of the masonry wall. On the residential property wall side, a hedgerorv consisting of # l0 shrubs, spaced three (3) leet on center, ald four (l) feet high at plantirg and tive (5) f'eet high within one year shall be provided. ttr addition, a rorv of canopy trees spaccd thirty (30) feet on center' and ten (10) leet in height at planting are required. On the fatility rvith fuel pumps wall side, a row of canopy trees, spaced thirty (30) feet on celtter, and twelve ( l2) feet in height at planting are required. A hedgerow consisring of#10 shrubs, spaced three (3) leet on ccnter, and four (4) feet high at plantingandtivc(5)fecthighwithinoneycarshallbeprovidcd.Requiredcanopytrees shall be staggered to accomnodate the canopy trees on the residential property wall side. d t) b e Music, aniplified sound, and delivery time standards Music and arnplified sound shall not be played in the fuel pump area between the hours of l0:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.rr. Music and amplilied sound shall not bc audible frorr the residential property line Deliveries shall be prohibited betrveen the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in the area located between thc neighborirrg residential property and the facility with fuel pumps . a. On-site lighting. On-site light fixtures within filty (50) fect ofresidential property shall not exceed a height greater than fifteen ( l5) feet above finished grade . Light fixtures elsewhere shall not exceed a height greater than twenty (20) feet above finished grade. 111 AII light fixtures shall be full cutoff with flat lenses a b 1V. ll. 4 Lighting standarcls. On-site luminaries sha1l be of low levcl, indirect diffuse type, and shall be between a minimum average of I .5 foot-candles and a maximum average of 5 foot-candles. Illumination shall not exceed: a) 0.5 foot-candles at ali residentiai property lines; and b) 0.2 foot-candles at ten (10) l'cet beyond all lesidential property lines Under-canopy lighting Lighting located underneath the canopy shall be recessed, of indirect diffuse t1pe, and designed to provide light only to the pump island areas located underneath said canopy. 6 Under canopy lurlinance shall be between a minimum average of 5 foot-candles and a maxirnum average of 20 foot-candles. Dumpster enclosures. At a minimum, the dumpster enclosure shall be located at a distance from residential property equal to the setback of the principal structur€ frorn residential property. See LDC _s,-c'c,tjq,-5.05.11 for car washes, vacuums, and cornpressed air stations abutting residential zoning districts. 5. A11 light fixtures shall be directed away from neighboring properties. l The following landscape requirernents are in addition to the requirements of s_c,91111{()tl.0fJ Landscaping and Buff'ering. 1. R ight-of-!r al bu[[er landscaping : a. Landscaping adjacent to rights-of-E'ay sxternal to Ihe devclopment ploject shall be located within a landscape buffer easement which is a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet in width. Water management swales shall not be located within these buffer areas; however, water rnanagement facilities such as underground piping shall be pcnnitted. b. An undulating berm with a maximurn slope of 3: I shall be constmcted along the entire length of the landscape buffer . The berm shall be constructed and maintained at a minimum average height of three (3) feet. Thc berm shall bc planted with ground cover (other than grass), shrubs. hedges, trees, and pahns. e. The required trees and palms shall be clustered in double rows with a rninimum of three (3) trees per cluster. Canopy hees shall be planted a maximum of rwenty (20) feet on center within a cluster. The use of palms within the right-of-way buffer shall be Iirnited to landscaped areas adjacent to vehicular access points. Palms shall be planted in staggered heights, a nrinimum of three (3) pahns per cluster, spaced at a maximunr of cight (8) feet on center, with a minimum of a four (l) foot dilference in height between each tree. Exceptions will be rnade for Roystonea spp. and Phoenix spp. (not including roebelenii) which [ray be planted one (I ) palm per cluster. A maximum distance oftwenty-five (25) feet between all types of tree clusters shall be rnaintained (See Illustration 1 below). All ofthe trees shall be a rninimum oflburteen ( l4) l'cct in heighl at the tirne ofinstallation Trees shall have a minimum ola three and oneJralf(32) inch caliper at twelve (12) inches above the ground and a six (6) foot spread. At installation, shrubs shall be a rninirnurn ol ten ( l0) gallons, five (5) feet in height, with a three (3) foot spread, planted lbur (4) feet on center. a. Landscaping adjacent to all other propcrly lincs Landscaping adjacent to all other property lines shall cornply u,ith the requirernents in l,DC scctiru ./.()6.01. Curbing shall bc installed and constructed, consistent with rninimum code recluirelnents, beru,een all pave(l areas and landscape areas. b E. d. 2. !l=LUSTRAlrol.r 1 11!l TREE ITYP-) rl * I CANOPY :. iq 3:l AERM @ 3' HT 10' MIN ooustE Row @ 20' MAx OISTANCE 6ETWEEI{ TREES EDGE DISTANCE BETWEEN CLUSTERS -:r SPACING BETWEEN BUFFER 20 SHRUA & GROUND COVEF EOGE MIN. 3 PALMS PER CLUSTERAT PAVEMENT ENIFANCES PnfPAREO gY, OFFICEcoxevrrY DcvEroPxaxr ^r{) I I ,..u- BUILDIN G (; lustration I . Facilities with Fuel Pumps R.O.W. I-andscape Requirements Storage tanks shall be located below grade. I'here shall be no outside displays of products, stacking ol tires, or other merchandise. I 25' wtDE I SPACING BETWEEN TREES rl J No facility rr ith fuel pumps shall have arl entrance or exit for vehicles within 200 feet along the sarne side ol a street as a school, public playglound, child care center, church , hospital, public library, or any institution for depcndenls or for children, except where such property is in another block . Each facilitl tith fuel pumps shall provide the necessary infrastructure and pre-wiring in order to providc thc capabilities lbr gencrator sen,ice in case olemergencies. In addition to the retail dispensing of autornobile fuels and oil, only the following services may be rendered and sales made, exccpt as indicated: l. Sales and servicing of spark plugs, batteries, distributors, and distributor parts. 2. Sales, mounting, balancing. and repair of tires and wheel alignrnents, but not recapping of tires Provision of water, antifreeze, flushing of the cooling system, air conditioning recharge, and the like. Providing and repairing fuel purnps and lines Minor motor adlustmerlts not involving removal of the head or crankcase Sales of coltl drinks. candies, tobacco, and sirnilar convenience goods for custorners. Provision ol road rnaps and othcr inlonration. l0 No nechanical work shall be allowed outside of the enclosed areas l 4 ..\ S 9 ll )2 Oil drainagc prts or appliances lor such purpose or repair purposes shall be locatcd within a wholly enclosed building. Uses pennissible at a facility with fuel pumps do not include rnajor mechanical and body work, straightening of frarnes or body parts, stean cleaning, painting, welding, storage of automobiles (except as expressly pennitted in subsection 13. below), commercial garage as an accessory use, or other work involving undue noise, glare, futnes, smoke, or other characteristics 10 an cxtent greater than nomrally lbund in such stations. A facility with fuel pumps is not a facility for the sale ol'autorrobile vehicles, a repair garage, a body shop, or a truck stop. The ternporary storage of vehiclcs shall be pennitted if the vehicles are to be seryiced at the facilitl with fuel pumps or if the vehicles have been towed by the facility tith fuel pumps and are being hcld tbr servicing, for an insurance company, or for salvage Any such vehicle(s), other I, Sales and replacement of water hoses, fan belts, brake fluid, light bulbs, fuses, floor mats, wiper blades, grease rctainers, wheel bearings, shock absorbcrs, mirrors, exhaust systerns, and the like. Greasing and lubrication. 13. than those vehicles serviced daily, shall bc stored within an area surrounded by an opaque I'cncc not less than six (6) feet high. Said vehicles shall not be stored longer than sixty (60) days. 14 Washing and polishing ofautourobiles and sale olautomobile washing and polishiug materials, but this only allows auto detailing as an accessory use . This provision does not allow carwashes except in those zoning districts where a carwash is a pennitted use, and where such carwashes shall be subiect to criteria specified in the zoning district. K. Exceptions: l. The site design standards set forth in LDC_ig,jrf_a]f 5.1[.0] B.l. (table) shall not apply to, nor render non-conforming, any existing facility with fuel pumps or any facility with fuel pumps within a PUD in which a specific architectural rendering and site plan was approved as part of a rezoning action prior to July 5, 1998. 2. The site design standards set forth in LDC section 5.05.05 C. - J. or any other applicable development standard shall apply to existing facilities with fuel pumps pursuant to the provisions ol![.Q! Nonconfonnities, and all other applicable sections of the Land Development Code. (Ord. No.09-43, $ 3.A;Ord. No. l0-23, $ 3.JJ;Ord. No. 13-56, d 3.S; Ord. No. l5-46, g 2.B) 5.05.06 - Private Airports From: ReischlFred [mailto:FredReischl@colliergov.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 9:00 AM To: John Wojdak Cc: BellowsRay; SmithCamden; VelascoJessica Subject: RE: RaceTrac at Shadowlawn See below. Fred Reischl, AICP Principal Planner 239-252-4211 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 www.colliergov.net From: John Wojdak [mailto:John@delisifitzgerald.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:54 AM To: ReischlFred Cc: BellowsRay Subject: RaceTrac at Shadowlawn Good morning Fred, I hope you weathered the storm OK. I still don’t have power at home, but otherwise, I can’t complain. I have a couple questions on the RaceTrac at Shadowlawn. We have the Site Plan with Deviations ready to submit. On the application, it notes it to be submitted concurrent with the SDP. It was my understanding from the pre-app we could submit the Site Plan w/ Deviations ahead and get some feedback prior to filing the SDP so that we didn’t spend all that effort on something that may change based on the initial staff review of the Deviations. Is this acceptable? Yes Second, we have the Distance Waiver Ready to submit as well but I realize our pre-app was specific to the Site Plan with Deviations. Is it possible to get a pre-app waiver on the Distance Waiver Application or maybe run through the application over the phone since we did talk about it in the Site Plan pre-app. Please let me know or give me a call to discuss. The Pre-App will be good for the Waiver as well as the DR (however, the pre-app notes will only have the PL number for the DR) I’ve attached the pre-app notes from the Site Plan with Deviations for reference. Thank you Fred, John John T. Wojdak, P.E. 1605 Hendry Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 P: (239) 418-0691 F: (239) 418-0692 C: (239) 565-3077 john@delisifitzgerald.com Parcel Info & Location Map 1) Parcel ID: 61834720003 Address: 2891 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: N G + T C L F NO 2 11 50 25 COMM NE CNR OF LOT 36, S 1510.20FT, W 5FT TO POB, W 137.85FT, S 92.07FT, SE ALONG N LINE OF TRAIL 149.96FT, N 38 DEG E ALG CURVE TO LEFT 33.96FT, N 160.13FT TO POB, LESS STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING CASE NO. 95-1010-CA OR 2403 PG 2369 Owner: SHADOWLAWN DEVELOPMENT 1 TRUST c/o INTERSTATE PROPERTIES 999 Broadway, Suite 400 Saugus, MA 01906-4510 2) Parcel ID: 61834680004 Address: 2887 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: N G + T C L F #2 FROM THE NE CNR OF LOT 36, N G T C L F #2 S 1237.70FT, S 89 DEG W 5 FT TO POB, S 272.44FT, S 89 DEG W 138.05FT, S 103.62FT, N 51 DEG W 73.21FT, N 329.70FT, N 89 DEG E 196FT TO POB, LESS STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING CASE NO. 95-1302-CA Owner: PALUMBO TR, ROSEMARIE D d/b/a SHADOWLAWN DEVELOPMENT 1 TRUST c/o INTERSTATE PROPERTIES 999 Broadway, Suite 400 Saugus, MA 01906-4510 3) Parcel ID: 26780080007 Address: 2795 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: COL-LEE-CO COURT BEG AT SE COR OF LOT-THENCE WITH NE R/W LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL N 51 DEG 58 MIN W 200FT, N 38 DEG 02 MIN E 125FT, N 75 DEG 46 MIN E 20FT, S 49 DEG 49MIN E 80FT TO E LINE LOT 1, S 175FT TO POB LESS ORDER OF TAKING CASE # 94-1749CA PARCEL 127 DESC IN OR 2403 PG 2376 Owner: GUTIERREZ, JAIME A 779 Nottingham Drive Naples, FL 34109-1641 4) Parcel ID: 26780040005 (PART OF) Address: 2757 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: COL-LEE-CO COURT LOTS 1 + 2, BEG SW CNR LOT 35 NG&TCLR #2, SELY ALG R/W TAMIAMI TRL 180FT, NLY 200FT, NWLY 180FT TO PT W LINE LOT 35, SLY 200FT POB LESS R/W & LESS OR 1157 PG 1403, LESS ORDER OF TAKING CASE #95 -764-CA PAR NO 126 Owner: ABC PROPERTIES LTD P.O. BOX 593688 Orlando, FL 32859-3688 Legal Description A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, BEING ALL OF PARCELS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3783, PAGE 2199, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1737, PAGE 463, OFFICIA L RECORDS BOOK 3784, PAGE 1811 AND A PORTION OF THE PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2095, PAGE 370 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THE RIGHT OF WAY TAKINGS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2403, PAGE 2369, OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2403, PAGE 2372 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2403, PAGE 2376, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36, NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK CO'S LITTLE FARMS No. 2, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 27 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S.00°01'49"E., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 36, FOR 1237.70 FEET; THENCE S.89°28'25"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1737, PAGE 463, THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF SHADOWLAWN AVENUE, A 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE S.00°01'49"E., ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY, FOR A DISTANCE OF 408.99 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.50 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 87°41'09", A CHORD BEARING OF S.53°57'42"W., A CHORD LENGTH OF 40.87 FEET AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 45.15 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (STATE ROAD No. 90, U.S. 41), A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE N.52°00'49"W., ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY, FOR A DISTANCE OF 390.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3783, PAGE 2199; THENCE N.37°59'11"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, FOR A DISTANCE OF 105.00 FEET; THENCE N.74°40'51"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE S.49°33'12"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1737, PAGE 463; THENCE N.00°10'21"W., ALONG SAID WEST LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 154.48 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE N.89°28'25"E., ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 196.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 90,556 SQUARE FEET, OR 2.079 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. NOV2017 DEL LAGO VENTURES, INC. SHAREHOLDER LIST 1. RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc. RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC. SHAREHOLDER LIST 1. Carl Bolch Senior Trust 2. Carl E. Bolch, Jr. GRAT Dated 12/23/2011 3. Susan Bass Bolch GRAT Dated 12/23/2011 4. Moran, Allison Bolch 5. Bolch, Jordan Bass 6. Isbill, Melanie Bolch 7. Morhous, Natalie Bolch 8. Lenker, Max 9. Dumbacher, Robert J. 10. Milam, Bill 11. Akers, Joseph H. 12. Eggers, Shirley B. 13. McBrayer, Max E., Jr. 14. Reese, Mark A. 15. Ahlert, Karla 16. Alexander, Will 17. Gilmore, J 18. Benton, Kelly Walker 19. Posener, Robby 20. Woodward, Whitney 21. Thornton, Brian 22. Siccardi, Jr., Arthur J. 1 Sarah McGowan From:Kurt Adams Sent:Thursday, November 30, 2017 3:15 PM To:Sarah McGowan Subject:FW: 2795 Tamiami Tr Sarah – This is what we’ve got. Will this work from Jaime? He owns this as an individual. Kurt Adams | Senior Real Estate Representative RaceTrac | racetrac.com | 200 Galleria Parkway SE, Suite 900, Atlanta GA 30339 o 770.431.7600 x1008 c 615.477.2816 f 678.305.7543 From: Craig D Timmins [mailto:Craig@ipcnaples.com] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 1:20 PM To: Kurt Adams Subject: FW: 2795 Tamiami Tr Kurt, please see the email below from Jaime Gutierrez. Craig D. Timmins, CCIM Principal Investment Properties Corporation of Naples 3838 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 402 Naples, Florida 34103-3586 tel 239.261.3400 x161 fax 239.261.7579 craig@ipcnaples.com www.ipcnaples.com Licensed Real Estate Broker CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email transmission (and/or the attachments accompanying it) may contain privileged and confidential information, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply email and destroy the original message. Thank you. LIABILITY DISCLAIMER: Buyers, Sellers, Landlords and Tenants must all conduct proper due-diligence when buying, selling or leasing commercial property. Due diligence should include, but not be limited to, matters involving zoning, permitting, environmental and all other regulatory matters, plus financial underwriting of participating parties including research associated with bankruptcy, foreclosure and financial capability. Neither IPC nor its employees, agents or staff perform appraisals or provide services of an appraiser. Additionally, parties should obtain tax and legal advice. IPC does not represent or warrant these matters nor is it responsible for the statements of third parties. From: Jaime Gutierrez [mailto:jaime58gu@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 12:09 PM To: Craig D Timmins Subject: Re: 2795 Tamiami Tr To whom it may concern 2 The purpose of this email is to confirm that I am the sole owner of the property located at 2795 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL, with the following property ID#: 26780080007. Jaime Gutierrez COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. F orms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) T DR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) 1 SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # Gas Station Distance Waiver COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2 Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Project Description & Location Map 1)Parcel ID:61834720003 Address:2891 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: N G + T C L F NO 2 11 50 25 COMM NE CNR OF LOT 36, S 1510.20FT, W 5FT TO POB, W 137.85FT, S 92.07FT, SE ALONG N LINE OF TRAIL 149.96FT, N 38 DEG E ALG CURVE TO LEFT 33.96FT, N 160.13FT TO POB, LESS STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING CASE NO. 95-1010-CA OR 2403 PG 2369 2)Parcel ID:61834680004 Address:2887 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: N G + T C L F #2 FROM THE NE CNR OF LOT 36, N G T C L F #2 S 1237.70FT, S 89 DEG W 5 FT TO POB, S 272.44FT, S 89 DEG W 138.05FT, S 103.62FT, N 51 DEG W 73.21FT, N 329.70FT, N 89 DEG E 196FT TO POB, LESS STIPULATED ORDER OF TAKING CASE NO. 95-1302-CA 3)Parcel ID:26780080007 Address:2795 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: COL-LEE-CO COURT BEG AT SE COR OF LOT-THENCE WITH NE R/W LINE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL N 51 DEG 58 MIN W 200FT, N 38 DEG 02 MIN E 125FT, N 75 DEG 46 MIN E 20FT, S 49 DEG 49MIN E 80FT TO E LINE LOT 1, S 175FT TO POB LESS ORDER OF TAKING CASE # 94-1749CA PARCEL 127 DESC IN OR 2403 PG 2376 4)Parcel ID:26780040005 (PART OF) Address:2757 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 Description: COL-LEE-CO COURT LOTS 1 + 2, BEG SW CNR LOT 35 NG&TCLR #2, SELY ALG R/W TAMIAMI TRL 180FT, NLY 200FT, NWLY 180FT TO PT W LINE LOT 35, SLY 200FT POB LESS R/W & LESS OR 1157 PG 1403, LESS ORDER OF TAKING CASE #95-764-CA PAR NO 126 From:ReischlFred To:Richard Yovanovich; Dianna Quintanilla; John Wojdak Subject:FW: Racetrack Proposal Shadowlawn and US 41 Date:Monday, February 12, 2018 8:59:53 AM FYI   Respectfully, Fred Reischl Fred Reischl, AICP New email as of 12/9/2017: fred.reischl@colliercountyfl.gov Zoning Division Growth Management Department “Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at https://goo.gl/eXjvqT” 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 239-252-4211   From: StrainMark  Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 7:15 AM To: ReischlFred <Fred.Reischl@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Racetrack Proposal Shadowlawn and US 41   Please process as typical.   Mark   239.252.4446 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.   From: janeking2008 [mailto:jdkingii@comcast.net]  Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2018 12:21 PM To: StrainMark <Mark.Strain@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: TaylorPenny <Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov>; FialaDonna <Donna.Fiala@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Racetrack Proposal Shadowlawn and US 41   Good Day Mr. Strain; Please accept this email as my objection to the request by the Racetrack Corporation to build a new facility at the corner of Shadowlawn and US 41. My objection is based on the following opinions. First, there are already three gas station/convenience stores on US 41 from Davis to Courthouse Shadows. So the need is not there. In fact the petitioner is asking for a variance due to being within 500 feet of an existing gas station. They know that the code does not allow for this and must have their request granted. If the county has codes for something why can a corporation come in and have existing codes changed just to satisfy their needs? I for one am tired of this happening all the time it seems. There was a reason these codes were enacted in the first place. Also the intersection in question is already very busy. It is not a straight crossing but diagonal. Already there are no turns on red lights due to safety concerns. We also have some of the highest pedestrian traffic in the area with quite a few not abiding by the designated crossing areas. This is both day and night, to include very early mornings as these individuals go to work. With the increased traffic, both automotive and pedestrian I believe this will be a major safety issue that can be avoided. Just down the street is Shadowlawn Elementary School which also has a high amount of foot traffic. Once again what about the safety of the children in the area. The intersection also has a very high traffic flow, with quite a few cars coming down Shadowlawn. Try coming out of the existing CVS Pharmacy during certain high times of the day and you will see. Even if Racetrack changes their entrances and exits to the rear of the proposed property most of the traffic will go to Shadowlawn for the traffic light. With the confusing legal description in the Naples News, I really do not know what other variances the petitioner is requesting, but then I go back to the codes and zoning. If none of these items that are on the counties books don't matter, why are they there? I know you will be having a hearing on February 22nd, but due to prior commitments I will be in Tallahassee dealing with some legislative issues. So that is the reason I am sending this email. As a 52 year resident of this area with the last 22 years living off Bayshore I am very aware of our area and the needs. Racetrack is not one of them. Thank you for taking the time to read my email and I hope that some consideration will be given. Sincerely James D. King 3308 Captains Cove Naples, Florida 34112 AGENDA ITEM 3-D CAlerCounty STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2018 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL20170003718, 1087 FRANK WHITEMAN VARIANCE PROPERTY OWNERIAGENT: Property Owner: Mr. Jordan T. Donini Mrs. Jacquelyn E. Coppard 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard Naples, FL 34103 REOUESTED ACTION: Agent: Ms. Francesca Passidomo, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich, Koester 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner consider an application for a Variance from Section 4.02.01 A., Table 2.1 of the Land Development Code to reduce the minimum side yard setback line from 7.5 feet (6.5 approved by administrative variance) to 4.7 feet for the existing single-family house located at 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at Lot 8, Block C, North Naples Highlands subdivision, also described as 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard, approximately V2 mile east of Tamiami Trail North and just south of the intersection of Park Shore and Tamiami Trail North, in Section 22, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida (See location map, page 2). PURPOSEMESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This residence is zoned RSF-4 and the east building elevation wall encroaches into the minimum side yard principal structure setback. The RSF-4 side yard setback is 7.5 feet; however, an Administrative Variance approval (AVA 98-36) was obtained to reduce the minimum side yard VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Vanance February 22, 2018 Page 1 &a 0 0 = = o 0� 0 0 ® R N N O 0 0 0 0 gis m O h nx N 0 O a n- VA-PL20170003718,1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 Page 2 of 8 setback from 7.5 feet to 6.5 feet. The approval letter and additional documentation for the 1998 administrative Variance is included as Attachment A. This attachment includes the original survey that was submitted for the 1998 administrative Variance, which conflicts with a later survey related to the Variance request. Additionally, on August 1, 2017, the agent for the property owner requested a zoning verification letter (ZVL) to confirm the nonconforming side setback condition on the east side. The letter utilizes the updated survey dated July 13, 2017 to verify the nonconforming condition. The ZVL confirms the existing setback of 4.7 feet and confirms the requirement to obtain a Variance for the nonconforming condition. The ZVL is number PL20170002429 and is included as (Attachment B). The impetus for this Variance is the recent purchase of the property by the applicant and the updated property survey related to the purchase. The signed and sealed survey is dated July 13, 2017 (signed -sealed August 22, 2017) and shows the existing encroachment along the east elevation building wall at 4.7 feet. As stated, the former 1998 survey showed the side yard setback for the east elevation at 6.5 feet. The survey has been included as (Attachment Q. The applicant is now seeking an after -the -fact Variance for a nonconforming condition following the purchase of the house. The agent for the applicant stated that they attempted to complete the process for the Variance application prior to the sale of the property, but there was not sufficient time prior to the purchase closing date. The encroachment includes the east elevation building wall only. According to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Property Card, the subject residence was constructed in 1954. The Zoning Division has searched for building permit records regarding this property and the Records Room does not have permit records for original construction. Based on the surrounding residential development pattern, during the 1950's, the neighborhood was probably zoned for residential use. The existing and current zone district is RSF-4 Residential Single -Family. The Zoning Division performed additional research related to the original 1954 zoning district and setback provisions at the time the house was constructed. Based on documentation in the 1955 Collier County Zoning Code and historical zoning maps, it was determined that the 1954 zoning district was likely RS -4 single-family residential and the minimum side yard setback dimension was 7.5 feet, which is very similar to the current LDC standards. There was a building addition to the property in 1998 to convert a flat roof and add a carport to the south building elevation. The permit number is 98-060437 (see Attachment D). The 1998 carport addition complies with all setback standards and does not affect the existing nonconforming side setback or the request for a side setback encroachment Variance along the east elevation of the house. It should be noted the property directly east of 1087 Frank Whiteman, which is 1097 Frank Whiteman, obtained a similar variance on November 1, 2001 from the Board of Zoning Appeals. The resolution was number 2001-440 and granted a 0.4 feet variance at the shared property line between the two parcels. The property at 1097 Frank Whiteman is lot 9 of the Naples Highlands subdivision. Resolution 2001-440 has been included as (Attachment E). To summarize, the purpose of the subject Variance is to allow the existing single-family residence to encroach into the approved 6.5 -foot administrative Variance side yard setback by VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 Page 3 of 8 1.8 feet, thus creating a 4.7 -foot side yard setback. A second and conflicting property survey is the impetus for the request as an administrative Variance was granted for 1087 Frank Whiteman, but it appears the 1998 survey was not correct. I I I ®° ¢ i I I 't � ! a� I � I I , �Y I} Y I I i� pp e ;a 9! to r•66^ �� ASS �4app 9t 4` 2 ON ya t' �i I i wwr r� m, South Florida Surveying Inc. 1087 FRANK WHTEMAN BOULFVARA- 3I11:JNAr.xSW. P6wv. e7Af N8-1169 _� - ..JwrYmWkllrNna..ney� Yp,/�.ww,d,�lLrrBdv,vnrul.aw .a,rlr raw Rf.n.t nurs�a BMWARY S RVEY 0 n.intayr�. Y - VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 Page 4 of 8 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: A single-family residence, with a zoning designation of RSF-4 North: Single-family residence, with a zoning designation of RSF-4 East: Single-family residences, with a zoning designation of RSF4 South: Single-family residence, with a zoning designation of RSF-4 West: Single-family residence, with a zoning designation of RSF-4 F\DI9 VlII GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY• The subject property is in the Urban Residential Sub district land use classification on the County's Future Land Use Map (FLUM). This land use category is designed to accommodate a variety of residential uses including single-family, multi -family, duplex, mobile home and mixed-use projects. As stated, the applicant seeks a Variance for a single-family home within a VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Vanance February 22, 2018 Page 5 of 6 single-family subdivision, which is an authorized land use. Accordingly, the single-family home land use is consistent with the FLUM. The Growth Management Plan does not address individual Variance requests related to land use. ZONING DIVISION ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a Variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03. The Zoning Division has analyzed this petition and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? Yes, there are peculiar characteristics of the building. A conflict exists between two different survey documents that were prepared for the property, one from 1998 and another from 2017. Both surveys confirm that the house was originally constructed with a side setback encroachment at the east property line. The nonconforming condition existed prior to the current property owner purchasing the property. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? Yes. Property Records and Building permits indicate that the applicant has owned the subject property since late 2017. The single-family residential side setback encroachments existed prior to the current owner taking possession of the property. According to information detailed on two surveys provided, the side yard setback encroachment has existed since prior to 1998. C. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? Yes. Based on research of available documentation, it seems certain that the house structure was constructed with a side yard setback encroachment along the east property line in 1954. Since a literal interpretation of the zoning code would require demolition and reconstruction of the east elevation building wall or acquisition of additional property through land division, the provisions of the zoning code will work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? Yes. The Variance, if granted, will be the minimum possible and results in no changes to the existing property conditions. VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 Page 6 of 8 e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? No. It is the opposite. Granting the Variance provides relief to the property owner for a nonconforming condition that was not a result of their actions and has the potential to cloud future title insurance research. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes. The general intent of the LDC for residential zone districts is to promote lands for single-family housing in areas of low density. Granting the Variance will be in harmony with the general intent of the LDC. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? No. The Variance request is to correct a nonconforming condition that exists only because the house was constructed to encroach the side setback line by approximately 2.5 feet. If the Variance is granted, conditions at the subject property will not change. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the GMP? Approval of this Variance will be consistent with the Collier County GMP. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The Office of the County Attorney reviewed this Division Report on 1/31/18. RECOMMENDATION: The Zoning Division recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve petition VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard Variance. Attachments: Attachment A: Administrative Variance approval May 29, 1998 Attachment B: Zoning Variance Letter ZVL 20170002429 Attachment C: 1998 AVA 98-36, Survey Attachment D: Building Permit 98-060437 Attachment E: Resolution 2001-440 Variance for 1097 Frank Whiteman VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 Page 7 of 8 PREPARED BY: C. J S S ,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZO G D SIGN -ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: 2.7•/Qj RAYMO ELLOWS,ZONINGMANAGER- DATE ZONING VISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION 2-7- 18 MICHAEL BOSI, AICP. DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank WMemen Vanance February 22, 2018 Page 8 of 8 ATTACHMENT A COLLIER COUNT' GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING SERVICES May 29, 1998 Mr. Mel Staves The Sorbara Company, Inc. 4380 Enterprise Ave. Naples, FL. 3104 Re: Approval of Administrative Variance 98-36, 1087 Frank Whitman Boulevard, Lot 8, Block "C°, North Naples Highlands, in Section 22, Township 49 South, Range 25, Collier County, Florida. Dear Mr. Staves: Requests for variances for minor improvements to legal non -conforming structures located within a residential zoning district may be approved administratively by the Planning. Services Director for encroachments equal to or less than the existing side or rear yard encroachment. The survey provided to the Current Planning Section in the application packet clearly indicates that the existing side yard is 6.5 feet, which is one foot less than the 7.5 feet required by the Collier County Land Development Code. The proposed carport will encroach one foot into the required side yard setback which is equal to the existing side yard encroachment and falls within the threshold for administrative variance requests. Current Planning staff has reviewed the administrative variance request and have found that this request meets the criteria for granting the administrative variance as outlined in the in Section 2.6.4.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Further, granting of this variance will not affect the air and light considerations of adjacent property owners. You may wish to have this letter of approval recorded in the official records of Collier County as a permanent record of the variance approval. Building Review & Permitting (941) 403-2400 Natural Resources (941) 732-2505 Code Enforcement (941) 403-2440 Planning Services (941) 403.2300 Housing & Urban Improvement (941) 403-2330 Po lution Control (941) 732.2502 VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me, Sincerely (Robert J. Mulhere, AICP Panning Services Director State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Agreement Sheet was acknowledged before me this -V—.- day of 1998 by , who is personally known to me and who did (did not) take4n oath. (} (Signature of Notary Public) CC: Ronald F. Nino, AICP, Current Planning Services Manager K VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 1� - —CeA� NOTARY PUBLIC Commission # My Commission Expires: .'sSl,fic CEMIA K MAR M NUPARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION No. CC4516 22 MY COMMW40N EXP. APR. 711999 CC: Ronald F. Nino, AICP, Current Planning Services Manager K VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 ATTACHMENT B Co e�rCC, amnty Growth Management Department — Planning & Regulation Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section August 1, 2017 Mr. Michael D. Gentzle Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 Re: Zoning Verification Letter ZLTR-PL2017OW2429: 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard in Section 22, Township 49 South, Range 26 East of unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Property ID Number: 64260680004. Dear Mr. Gentzle: This letter is in response to a Zoning Verification Letter Application (ZLTR) submitted on June 30, 2017 In which you have requested the following information: • That the existing site improvements constructed on the above referenced property meet all the current setback requirements and if they do not meet the setback, please confirm that they are legal nonconforming structures. The Zoning Services Section of Planning and Zoning Division has jurisdiction over zoning and land use issues. In response to your specific question, the County finds that the subject property is currently zoned Residential Single -Family (RSF-4) as provided for in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). Based on the updated survey submitted on July 19, 2017, the site improvements constructed on the property do not meet the current minimum 7.5 -foot side yard setback requirement for the RSF-4 zoning district. The survey shows the side yards measured as 4.7 feet and 6.8 feet. Staff's research indicates that an Administrative Variance was approved on May 29, 1998 which reduced the required side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 6.5 feet. This variance was attached to building permit number: 98-060437 which depicted the existing dwelling as providing a 6.5 -foot setback for both side yards. Thus, the 6.8 -foot encroachment from the west side property line can remain since it is within the 6.5 -foot side yard setback approved by the variance. However, VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 the 4.7 -foot setback from the east property line exceeds the 6.5 -foot setback established by the variance. In addition, because the zoning at the time construction, the did not permit a 4.7 -foot side yard setback, the subject dwelling is not deemed to be legal a nonconforming structure. Therefore, a variance is required to permit a 4.7 -foot side yard setback as depicted In the survey. Disclaimer: Please be advised that the information presented in this verification letter is based on the Collier County LDC and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendment(s) to either of these documents and/or to the PUD document could affect the validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited to, concurrency related to the provisions of the adequate public facilities, environmental impact, and other requirements of the Collier County LDC or related ordinances. This letter represents a determination of Zoning Services Staff. Should disagree with this determination, you may request an Official Interpretation by the Planning & Zoning Director of the provisions of the Land Development Code pursuant to Sections 1.06.01A and 10.02.02F.1 of the at Code. The fee for an Official Interpretation is identified in the most recent CDED Fee Schedule Resolution as approved by the Board of County Commissioners. To obtain copies of any document referenced herein, please contact the GMD Records Room at 252-5603. The LDC may be viewed online at www.municode.com /municode library/Florida/Collier County. Validated Ordinances may be viewed online the via the Clerk of Courts website, www.colliercierk.com/Records Search/BMR Records/Boards, Minutes, Records/BMR Validated Ordinances. Should you require additional information please do not hesitate to call our office at (239) 252-2400. Sincerely, �•�.c ( `�' •'�- ...- Inc_ Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division — Zoning Services Section CC: ZVL Records VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 ATTACHMENT C 1998 SURVEY AVA 98-36 VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 TW SURVEY DEPMO HEREON M NOT COVERED BY PROFESSIONAL LINWW PIGUAM" UfAffromund tt"M vv" r" bated rw b-rkW vW I I aN ArlW PIN bony= = SZLWMW fticW hereonftmoft MTS SIM7.6 Maeon rwo were no wwwww" exam a wwvn The Wo vm kn*tm tW ft , am w saw# I'" ma" b nNY iw sommay LOGALMCRPTOW. LOG. Unkr- HoM%k%aNWwsft m =1 n= it RDW ZONE -X. Cwmftvft Nr. i W" 2. P.,A OM &.& JE PWAMPOR & JWV," V. "d Elrw Pdoncy cmnwm TO: G.F_ Cap" M0t4e0e SwAca AarGeyO La" TM a" lKdifM PRM nlo F— PM - P.Wf bw." P_ pm - P.6. CM - C...d. n.Am K:Pwd.­6. :b.— ps PDAIII"A : 1— pp. P,_ pw -ftww� w - wr IIM- No arld ut ut . Lwv PREPARED BY: ART"URCIOUPHOLLPSM Sint. PA ooxsx .- WW ACO ANK FL UIAIBet', :AfiNwC.QWm*l.P5Mj D T ATTACHMENT D 1998 BUILDING PERMIT 98-060437 VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 Permit Tracking and Inspection COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT HISTORY REPORT PERMIT NBR: 98060437 JOB DESC: CONVERT FLAT ROOF & ADD CARPORT STATUS: VOID JOB LOCATION: 1087 FRANK WI -11 TEMAN BLVD FOLIO NUMBER: 0000064260280004 SUBDIVISION: 1313 i North Naples Highlands BLOCK: C LOT: 8 MASTER NBR: 0 TRS: 49 25 22 TAZ: 84 COA: FLOOD ZONE: X OWNER NAME: PALONCY. JAMES V=& ELYSE JOB PHONE: CERT NBR: 16351 DBA: 'I IIE SORBARA COMPANY JOB VALUE: $26.000.00 CONTACT NAME: GEORGE SORBARA CONTACT PHONE: (941)262.6990 SETBACKS: FRONT: 25.00 REAR: 25.00 LEFT: 7.50 RIGHT: 7.50 SPECIAL: ADM. APPROVED VARIANCE 98-36 ATTACHED TO PLANS UNIT: TRACT: NONE WATER: SEWER - Important Dates: kPPLY APPROVE FISSUED7CO EXPIRE CANCEL EXT- C-- EXPIRE i 770 voi 1 o/ 1 17b v /NG/ 1996 96 02/01/1999 10294 ACTIVF 06/16/1998 CANCEL RI: SUNCOAST ROOFING OF NAPLES. INC' VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 08BPNP POSTED BLDG PERMITS - NAPLES N $185.00 08MFSG POSTED MICROFILM SURCHARGE N $2.00 0813ACR POSTED BLDG. PERMIT APP. F1'F CREDIT N ($36.00) 0813APP POSTED BLDG. PERMIT APPLICATION FEE N $36.00 llnspection History: I ASS CLDESCRIPTION/REMARKS PRI REQ RES RES INSNEC7'ORj _ DATE CODE DATE 108 S_I' FRAMING 0 08/05/1998 90 08/0i/1998 KEOHANE M III RF FRAMING 0 08/04/1998 91 08/04/1998 KEOHANE M DRY IN ONLY _ FRAMING 099 ST BOOK 2443 PAGE 0 07/23!1998 90 07/23/1998 CERON J 1791 100 S I' FRAMING 0 07/23/1998 90 07/23/1998 CERON J 106 SI, FRAMING 0 07/28,1998 91 07/28/1998 KEOHANI M POST OKAY 107 ST FRAMING 0 08/04/1998 90 08/04!1998 KEOHANE M 108 ST FRAMING 0 08/04/1998 75 08/04/1998 AIRS 109 SI FRAMING 0 113 ST FRAMING 0 115 ST FRAMING 0 122 SS FRAMING 0 133 ST FRAMING 0 134 RF FRAMING 0 VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 2ol'7o�79 33? -, COLLIE R C'()1'ti'"1'Y GOVE R1�lE'�tT I.; k)P\tl \ \V)! iii2t)\alt 1)\7F -7A--f -1/.- PERMITS BN AFFIDAVIT hittd.t tiull.:,u.; ( ,:;, I, the Kuu�fur( "i, 1.11 h" aCCC1u .111 .II)PGcautttt tot :I huil,,ini, 11',rt'; t, h. n aIt'td,I.:: It it a t _I,i�,+r� ar�hnrtit t 1, :I mrir ti�ctioll 1-1i ?t: 105- 14 Permit i..ued nn ha�is of an aliida\it. \1'hr e.Cr a per!n:t „ I,�ued IT: It:hanre 111 aliidX,It or vvhrn v1,r .i1. vv,'1,f, to tv c��v1,n a I)e"wnt Invohe,, in;t:Ilfatxut under cor,dltl(tn� vaht�h. �n the opinion of the Iwildine nfliciol. me ha/ardlou or �t nli)le�v, the hw dm'2 otltt'Gli arC1111CC'1 W enclnee1, vv ho tiit_'nc`u Iht. articl.ty it u1, pit'11,31eti A' cii.r.v nlLIs (11 :1111PUt111011, hall supervtsc <uch tiork` In addrion, ih— .h.11i tit: Iof m1Urt itv G) the p milt. prov ((.jt' �)h ICR ilt InSr�t tIl'n tC1);`n..A tll�lk ilhi'r� are l)e11+)ruled- a i�! 1,po" coml)ietion mAe and We vvIlli the hulldm, 11fht-utl v+itltrr .:(fidavwt that tau !Iit = hee^ ., ,, k-wito,711It,,t0 the 1,Cv ICyv �ti 1,1..�1< anti ".:h ?h; ,uui 11I� ai 111,0, t iia ,oLjc- 1't :Ic :>c at'.i1 :C . tit Itit': f 110; _n..,i.;l);c'. i?:C „u ,.1,sh,t; 1: 1! It iCial ,f oll, k'wllf 1wi s. "I 7 ,t en: \ Uhl)}i Cl Uiiiltt:,mons are rC', 1C\ked h` toC' .l, t.-.. _'.lit_ t' .' ,t•.t' C,;.,t:Pt' that ,1:1 �• .'Cli tln�.r �,_ P: c'\.tt „Cr tl,ll.Cl 1'.it. Ail nt l ,Il)It r4hfi. F�t,.lcl,t itatt.tc�..:nd thnt .:IT\ iv -'or ll :,i;Ii3�'d y tt h'_:Ilultir' >tl�t'CC'ut' Utila'r 1),:rt III t)' (�h.tpic-1. 1ltA- H(l;-icl: 1 Etc' :A0. hlte. t tit- : nginck r 11al l ct hn"t ` %:i, ,l` 1dAA it, .j�ing the 1Itta-,hcd t'tt !wc,,; for they- rec(Uetit i1t11 ding I cl' ',Iit h\ Alt)d1\11 (-onstructlun �\Itlda\t ( dttItI1 alC t)' (k t'il1)dllk : hA, It t ( Crtlflt:I;r k,o (nm•)IChtu1 hV .Attufzivi( �. I -Pec t:orn hi`»nn, ')V \ttldav it . Eictlt:mi� 1%ncc:.�)r (ol(:rr( „ttrtty .3u:ldrna� �h•1),et•r1:�n1 VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 BUILDING PERMITS BY AFFIDAVIT \,un(' �r,hitc � ctr F,ngtneer Uul� Iwcnsc(i and re!,t tc•rcd �% t[It he Statc of kond a. Re IstraUon #i�^--- WrchN --ili v that I liaI,c rc�icued the pI;ins and ,pet ifictltiuns submitted tit- \aruc t,f' Contrartut Naar tf: c +ntpan� tOr the �t�El�:''u�ittrl (tt I �t�e nl �!ru�'lillC :Address tai C'tmstructrun I tic a)ot e :Ippl:catioil anti IU( 11101 d000TTIenI.'; conform to the requirerncnts o! thr I It�r7da Burldin; Codc llutldnW, PlUlllhrn��'. (.;,ts. Mcchanrc,tl. Electrical. the GAlrcr (:( turn 1'�cxtdhlatn �1;rnat'rn!cn! Oldtnancv. thr Collic! Land Det,clopmelt; iouc ;he C'Ahvi-(-oant\(iurlcitn�� \urtuntstrtltr�e C)rdtna- -111,. thr Cuilnt ('oturtt, C:rntra:toi I.t,:cv I!IL ( )rd m,lncc•. ITIC Iu(1imo- ;rotncI- reIcvItitt E.rsti, it t: code', or oldlnances. All ton,tructuur and Irt,ptctrtut. shah he in coii[orrnance %ttlh [he aho�c rode" an i C)id,nance, and t,c perf< rnreta anti \c'rlfied h� the ;architect or engineer or record who tip.ail >uhiml ,iLned and ,t-ALd .n,l'•c, nun repot -I> ftp[- the record uptm :onip;ettim to !r; B111,&1w ( Micial Signa re VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 CONSTRUCTION AFFIDAVIT I. _ - of record ,me \r. h-tr, t .;i i -n" • t-c•r Registration # �7 j� _ for Kermit u for the rtwstru�: tion of i a t _��_ �/located at herehy cend-v that I have !nahcrted all <<instru,:[i«n 1'.)r the ahoNo rarted hermit. I further crrtil� that the L��n tru�lton ; in a.eureian�r w;ih suhi111110 i hi.ins and speci;icati+m, and inerts all i, tli,irenn nt, idf the Fl,irw a Ruiidinv Cede - BLII:din :. Plurth;ng. G.:,. Mc,:hanic,ii. Le,:trical all othrr cvdc< and crdinancrs as L'reed in the Building, Permit A:fida�,it- si_�.�tar. _ 1f1 I\ SL % VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 CEIRTIFICATE OF COMPLEMON Bl'AFFIDAVIT of recorki. for pemil I P _tor the constru,mon off ___ --located x ccrtiiie, the ahovc ZtruClLIry i, x ac,:ordan,,c %yah afll in the Buildim-, Permit IN sti,t-, W(J"wNt 'Ile Ii 1,S I J ;ILC t )I A (*CI I I I I k' JtC (� I C()rll p I e I I k I;,,. �11411-7 VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BY AFFIDAVIT Lhzw CA -)a_ _ — --- --- I I l, ---A �--- ?)51 ---- o" record. Nxne RegiNtration # IP4�f C -l-, Z, for t com,tr�Joion of (,I) 0 ��_tAl- -4- 74' 7 the aho%e .trixturt, IN Tl \k ith all rcquiiement, III Ific Pen -nit Vtidjivit. and. a., reLjLJC',l ("Ic IsNuarWc of a Cclolicalc o!' ( 'onipielloll kll:lx 1[- \1 VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 STRUCTURAL INSPECTION REPORT BY AFFIDAVIT Perm I a Pro;act Address We of In,spection.- / I/ co ,� � Job Descnptior. .Deylj A-;i�,% 177 Cont -actor: ✓7' _. v /%O/1i 5 _ Phone a Za97533 O.vner s Name Phone # Irsp Pass fall Incomplete Comments Code Description 'JC -�ooter'_oundat;on "jI Pile Caps 102 Grade Beam "s r oatrrp Slab 'ie Beam . � She?r'fJa�l I v= CCIumn; 7 Sheathir•y Metal Faszla A UC F rarr—q 110 "le Dover, 1 ' 1 Roof+ng m P -ogress 115 Firral 6uddin 1 1 1 e t-mte Beam 119 FtlI CoOn 12C Flood bent Relief 1?' Elevatoo Epicore Jer-r 124 Steel Stanway 125 Elevator Pq 128 Break Away Wall '30 Tenant Sop F•amnc 31 tenant Sep Drywalf� 32 Tenant Sep Insulatron 33 "1lonoliMic Stab '34 aminal Roofing 3s -Ina Shut'ers 136 MPacl Glass Framing 137 wl. Design Pressures deport App-oyed t,y rs.,c�:-t�en ret -`t' r County Buiali�g met„iRrcr.rt a`tar each �nst,rcir�n s �Ompie'ad VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 PLUMBING / MECH / POOL INSPECTION REPORT BY AFFIDAVIT Permit # Pro oct Address 1*2 6WIC— wrh� l Date of insoect-nr fp Jot, nescr,pt nn Contractor:_,, SAG✓?eNS_ Phone# 239"7V'C%?+a Owner's Name Jj i► -t Phone n : 2:3 [ � Z,g�/` Insp Pass Fau Incomplete Comments Code Description ;�UO PIL,nttnny "uu..an 201 Plu"InIn') Tut; Set 2C2 P1 im'irn-j Sta, t `.-st 203 SewF>r ':al; 204 sinal Plumbinq 10c nsuiat un Cv� 300 Mecha^ic-t! Roug' 301 Fina PAe�, ranic.ti AC 302 Mech v,rc.i Pirnn,J 400 Gas Fta 3t (- 401 t'ina! Ga, 700 Pool steei <% 70' Fina! Pot;. i0Z Pool Deck �eoOrt Apor ved b✓ i pt '1.1 Date '10Z17 R'UTE --- ��.t rr, ins r..isr,; reC,oe t8 , iO C A- County Builtim�J verrtrtm,>rt attt each inspCCtror, VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION REPORT BY AFFIDAVIT Pr rr ' i w Project .address: Date o' I-ispeol or Jot) Descr ptton JbeTt% COn;�aetOr:�II , - Phone a Ov,r.er, Narrnt _�.J(M ! 'hone 53-23--- Irsp Pass Fall tncompiate Comments Code Description l r-1(—frac Rough 510 Final Electric 506 Urda�rprounU Wirny 143 1 ow volta=Jr woUyn 9 lo.^. "�«lta la Final :yeri,r+Y RU.rgn r r fir -curry ^'3 F r,ni AL,c,r, 519 Light ng R(xi,Jh 510 F;nai Lighting 400 Gas Rcu.-+, 40' c nal GcIs Hep, rt Ap1';r, J t,, Date. NU''.: ri Qirns! rtSp@C r�wer7 t:: tLP t'� SF_ f,OU^SV K"JAmt) rine• VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 L� L� Hep, rt Ap1';r, J t,, Date. NU''.: ri Qirns! rtSp@C r�wer7 t:: tLP t'� SF_ f,OU^SV K"JAmt) rine• VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION 'I his Certiticatc is issued pursuant to the requirements of the Florida Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the county regulating building construction or use. For the followin,: PERMIT NBR: CDP9806043701 C() NBR: STATUS: Finaled CO TYPE: C0'v1P ISSI:ED DATE: August 15, 2017 AD )RB' 1087 Frank Whiteman BLVD SUBDIV[SION: LO1: BOCK: T.R.S.: SLUG CC:>L!L- 1111,11 Y COMPANY: JUI3 DISC; CONVERT FLAT ROOF & ADD CARPORT 1087 FRANK W'HITHN1AN BLVD NI IMBF,R OF METERS: (MINLR: PALONCY, JAMES V LEGAL. DESCRIPTIO�1 N NAPLES I I1GI ILANDS BLK C LOT 8 Note: A new certificate is required if the use of the building or premises is changed. or if alterations are made to the building or propern described. A new certificate voids any certificate or prior date. VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 ATTACHMENT E 17C Iqi RESOLUTION No. 01- 4 4 0 RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA - 2001 -AR -1311 FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutea, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 1 -foot after -the -fact variance from the required side yard setback of 7.5 feet to 6.5 feet and an after -the -fact 0.4 foot -variance from the required side yard setback of 7.5 feet to 7.1 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", in a "RSF-4" Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition V -2001 -AR -1311 filed by John W. Enlow, representing Adam Hubischman, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Lot 9, Block C, North Naples Highlands, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 12, Official Records of Collier County. be and the same hereby is approved for a 1—foot after -the -fact variance from the required side yard setback of 7.5 feet to 6.5 feet and after -the -fact 0.4 -foot variance from the required side yard setback VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 of 7.5 feet to 7.1 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", of the "RSF-4" Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: 1. The variance is only for the main structure as shown on the attached exhibit. 2. In the case of the destruction of the encroaching structure, for any reason, to an extent equal to or greater than 50 percent of the actual replacement cost of the structure at the time of its destruction, any reconstruction shall conform to the provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of reconstruction. BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number VA-2001-AR.1311 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of ,moi , 2001 IOjT 6,BROCK, Clerk Q lttpxt,as:to Chsirwn,s :1de�9lxe Form and Legal Sufficiency: maU01M M. Student Assistant County Attorney VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: LAMES CAR P . HAIRMAN yl 17c r 14164' xPj jar, Isil ru• • XN at t' '• Java, 11 !D So oe to 1121.61 P t = t P4 sEL1oiV0 AVE: (Plat) c T?th SIREET N. (FA W) r VA-2001—AR-1311 E EXHIBIT "A" VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 •,ii•�F�•NNO�o. $#$seeills; I — a �If Q - A i s i 8 .»..aFi F a4•gas is M VA-PL20170003718, 1087 Frank Whiteman Variance February 22, 2018 0 CYK 0 T C 1W HEX Packet Project: VA PL20170003718 Property Address: 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard Hearing Date: 2/22/2018 Applicant: Francesca Passidomo • • HEX Packet Project: VA PL20170003718 Property Address: 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard Hearing Date: 2/22/2018 Applicant: Francesca Passidomo INDEX TO HEX PACKET 1. Completed Application 2. Pre -Application Waiver Project Narrative i3. 4. Addressing Checklist 5. Site Plan 6. Survey 7. Deed 8. Location Map 9. Aerial 10. Historical Survey 11. Response Letter 12. Hearing Sign • • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net rtq� !'lei County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 VARIANCE PETITION APP=IICATI N Varian Ce from Setbacks Required fora, P artaoutar Zoning District LDC section 9.04.00 & Code of Laws section 2-33 — 2-90 Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Cade PROJECT NUMBER To be completed by staff PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONT CT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Jordan T. Donini and Jacquelyn E. Coppard, husband and wife Address: 4001 Tamianni Trail N, Suite 300 City: Naples State: Florida ZIP: 34103 Telephone: 239-435-3535 Cell: E -Mail Address: fpassidomo@cyklawfirm.com Name of Agent: Francesca Passidomo Firm: Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, PA Address: Fax: 4001 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 300 City: Naples State: Florida ZIP: 34103 Telephone: 239-435-3535 E -Mail Address: Cell: fpassidomo@cykiawfirm.com Fax: BE A1111ARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND EI�lSU?1 THAT T YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE ,"�ITi' THESE REGULATIONS. — 4/11/2017 Page 1 of 6 .Y Co C1' County :T:2.�...'-'�Y' L-�`-�t=�"'°xNt�.✓%��iaae.;F�s`4}tt?'L::: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 F_ PROPERTY INFORMATION I Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: 64260280004 Section/Township/Range: Subdivision: North Naples Highlands Unit: N/A Lot: 8 Block: c _ Metes & Bounds Description: Total Acreage: .15 Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE 1 Zoning Land Use N RMF -6 Urban Residential Subdistrict S RSF-4 E RSF-4 Urban Residential Subdistrict Urban Residential Subdistrict W I City of Naples Incorporated Area Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: RSF-4 *Per attached Grant of Administrative Front: 25 Corner Lot: Yes ❑ No Variance 98-36 dated May 29, 1998, Side: 7.5'* Waterfront Lot: Yes ❑ No 0 the side yard was reduced to 6.5' Rear: 25 Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 4/11/2017 Page 2 of 6 • • • 0 County C::v-+ �21'T.a'f"'t�.i �'.a:".^.SY�'^.,.W.='+L•.4s COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: NATURE OF'PETITION On a separate sheet, attached to the application, please provide the following: 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a -h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. 4/11/2017 Page 3 of 6 ey County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ® Yes ❑ No if yes, please provide copies. See Exhibit F. 4/11/2017 Page 4 of 6 • • • CO., County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meet sn- and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES ' REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) ❑ ❑ ❑ Pre -Application Meeting Notes 1 ❑ ❑ Project Narrative ❑ ❑ ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ❑ ❑ Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36" and one 8'/: " x 11" copy ❑ ❑ ❑ Survey of property showing the encroachment (measured in feet) 2 ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 ❑ ❑ Deeds/Legal's 3 ❑ ❑ Location map 1 ❑ ❑ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial 5 ❑ ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification 3 ❑ ❑ Once the frrst set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned planner the Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 ❑ ❑ ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 4/11/2017 Page 5 of 6 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT cdrel county 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collierRov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following reviewers: C) Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Executive Director Meeting Sign -In Sheet ❑ Addressing: Annis Moxam ❑ Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ❑ Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Meeting Sign -In Sheet ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan ITParks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad ❑ County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko ❑ Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or School District (Residential Components): Amy E]Engineering: EMS: Artie Bay Alison Bradford Fou Heartlock Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky ❑ Other: Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey FEE REQUIREMENTS 0 Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 Variance Petition: 0 Residential- $2,000.00 0 Non -Residential- $5,000.00 0 51n and Subsequent Review- 20% of original fee 0 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 After The Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions: 2x the normal petition fee Listed Species Survey (if EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Zoning Division ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Applicant Signature Printed Name Date Page 6 of 6 4/11/2017 10 • r1 C© 7E;r C07,iWEy COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIN (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) 1E] VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) LOT 8, BLOCK C, NORTH NAPLES HIGHLANDS, PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 12 S 2 T 4, u R25 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 64260280004 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 1087 FRANK WHITEMAN BOULEVARD • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP_- or AR or PL # Co ey County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34204 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: FRANCPSCA PASSIDOMO Phone: 239-435-3535 Email/Fax: FPASSIDOMO@CYKLAWFIRM.COM Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. --R-aNG SC61 TQ Sif OWO Francesca Passidomo • FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number b `i - k"I6 0 d'0 C' r Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number ' Y Date: 1 16 i 20, 17 Approved by:. Updated by: 1 Date: 'F OLDER THIAN 6MIONTHS, FORM# MUST BE ii. PDAT-D OR NEW, FORM SUBM11 TED 0 • 1. Explanation of Request. This petition pertains to a certain improvements upon the real property with a site address of 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard (Parcel ID No. 64260280004) (the "Property"). The Property is located in the RSF-4 zoning district, fronting Frank Whiteman Boulevard between US -41 to the west and 12"' Street North to the east. An aerial of the Property is attached as Exhibit A. The single family residence located on the Properly was constructed in 1954. The property card appears to demonstrate that the footprint of the existing residence is the same as it was when initially constructed in 1954. A copy of the property card is attached as Exhibit B. Conversations with the Improvements Department of the Collier County Property Appraiser confirmed that the entire eastern side of the residence is the original structure. The applicable minimum side yard at the time the residence was constructed was 7.5'. In connection with Petitioner's predecessor -in -interest's improvements to the Property in 1998 (specifically, construction of a carport attached to the southwestern corner of the existing residence and conversion of the flat roof over the den to a pitched roof) (the "Minor Improvements"), a variance was administratively approved to allow the residence to continue to exist in its current location. The grant permits the structure to exist 6.5' from the side property lines, which is one (1) foot less than that required. A copy of the grant of variance is attached as Exhibit C. The variance was based on an inaccurate survey that depicted the dwelling as approximately 6.5' from the side property lines. A copy of the survey submitted with the request for variance is attached as Exhibit D. In conjunction with Petitioner's purchase of the Property, Petitioner obtained an updated survey dated July 19, 2017. The updated survey revealed that the side yard from the eastern property line measures as 4.7'. The updated survey is attached as Exhibit E. The 4.7' distance exceeds the 6.5' setback granted by the 1998 administrative variance. Upon receipt of the updated survey, Petitioner requested a Zoning Verification Letter from Collier County. Conclusively, in a Zoning Verification Letter dated August 1, 2017, the Collier County Zoning Manager confirmed that the residence is not non -confirming and that a variance is required to permit the 4.7' side yard setback along the eastern boundary. The Zoning Verification Letter is attached as Exhibit F. In addition, the variance is required to address an allegedly open permit for the Minor Improvements. The Collier County Zoning Manager verified the same by email dated September 7, 2017. (As background, in the course of Petitioner's due diligence of the Property, it discovered certain open permits on the Property. In the course of performing inspections on the Property in order to close out the open permits, Collier County advised Petitioner's predecessor -in -interest that certain improvements had been made to the northeastern corner of the residence without a permit. In response, Petitioner's predecessor -in -interest submitted a request for a building permit by affidavit in regards to the alleged unpermitted improvements.) Petitioner acquired die Property on August 18, 2017 in its existing configuration. The warranty deed is attached as Exhibit G. 0 To close the open permit for the alleged unpermitted improvements, Petitioner has no practicable • alternative but to request approval for the principal structure to remain in its current location, where it has existed, to our knowledge, after due investigation, without complaint or objection for over 63 years. 2. N/A 3. Criteria per 9.04.00. a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. The modest size of the Property, historic nature of the residence constructed on the Property, and fact that the residence has existed in its current location without complaint or objection since the date it was constructed in 1954 are special conditions or circumstances which are peculiar to the structure involved and which are not applicable to other structures in the same neighborhood. The variance requested is the minimum necessary to bring the structure into compliance with the Code's current development standards. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. Petitioner acquired the Property on August 18, 2017 with the Property in its current • configuration. The residence was not constructed by Petitioner nor Petitioner's predecessor -in -interest. The residence has technically been noncompliant for nearly 63 years. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. A literal interpretation of the zoning code will work an unnecessary and undue hardship on Petitioner by effectively requiring Petitioner to demolish the residence, resulting in disproportionate economic waste. The variance is not only the most practical and Iogical solution, but it is also the most reasonable solution. d. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. The variance requested is the minimum necessary for Petitioner to make use of the existing residence. The variance will have no effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community. e. Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands. buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. • This variance should be granted based upon the unique set of facts applicable to this variance request and granting of this variance does not set a precedent for other variance requests. The residence, the subject of this petition, was constructed in 1954 and has continued to exist in its as -built location without complaint or objection. f. Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the zoning code. The residence is clearly a permitted use in the underlying zoning district. Further, the variance will not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood. The residence has been on the Property since 1954 without complaint. Finally, the variance will have no effect on the public welfare of the community. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. There are no natural or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation. h. The variance is consistent with the growth management plan. Allowing the existing residence to continue to exist in its current location, where it was constructed in 1954, rather than causing disproportionate economic waste, will promote comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies related to preservation of historic homes. 0 wj 4ouemvuu t -T 5240840000/1 iHui�imiuiiiiisiiiaii S42GO2800041--' 0 RANDOM !AWN sn CLASSED e 0 IpB��I��nRpl��nNl�l�9�1�PLOT PLAN GRAPH RANDOM 0 PLOmo 0 SCALE I% 3do ewc] • • • IIIIIIIIIIIIlIIIlIIIIl�I�IIIIIIII!!IIllflllllillllllll�Il!lI�Illlll 642602800043 ✓ att. 01 0 , 2 1 w DUILOIN+^1 211w I I I I I ROOMS stun Unla 2 51.x1 I Rf. Cervr,r I t Elle ne I 1 ASSE 8 I i 27' 12• I Q IG• I I ! I I woo 14 I 1 aa. 1+1-14- LOM. Nb --.—. En CAn!,rYon M.I: LSS,Or.I Me.. OP 20 39• ,t I � i I i ��—T— L2' 0P 20 l \ I i t IoR7 FranK kthlfrra n avo- W1.01M: 1 2 3 1 att. 01 0 , 2 1 w DUILOIN+^1 211w 1. ROOF FRANE rune I ROOMS stun Unla 2 51.x1 I Rf. Cervr,r IXfx:r UNI. Rmnu 1 Elle ne RDOF ttPC FTe, �Rm A ra 1 SU3•S7RUCTU0.E SMS I Sb1 _ _ Pww y LOM. Nb NNr. I PLVgaIMG CAn!,rYon M.I: LSS,Or.I Me.. Coe D.m, Fbp , tar Fa:,e,a a.n, 1 '+ sR.bNe __ 1 Ffa.m.a (_ I_t,y_ z r.1•x.. I Nan 1 Deck 1 NN.. 1 F�rw.. • Firnwla ' FRAMC ROOFING rae!•t M I I Rdl Funnt Yeoe•,Ww 'T Snn, 1 • Rnf Raga. 1 &Ott • In M Flux : ! I Ter C1 1 ; /2 T:4 ruR. 1 a— RI CeaNr t MR.e 1 sn.l ! ACrl,a1 ,:mn Re Coe. S1n1 1 T.. II i I I NEATIMG slow I I W C-1. Hew • Mel.l OCTERIOR rALL3 BuN.• Tec I Nor. I I I f S,wm I IbT MNn 1 INN dr S,xe I 1 Fl9CRS W1wJye 1 I qM 1 1 Pn Sn.•y O.M. O.M. H 6 AA 51MN 1 4, 1 DeOYr ELWRMITT T.. _ I IbhaO3 {. since. I Mdv EM-Ew1 NaOe I Twreile _ 1 E ' I I 54re1— f 1 Ellett � NN.1 1 • e��.GO,j,-1 ,aO•, 8ekk1 1 IMTER OR MALLS Few b,aa ran W 1 OHO 4 I EL Han F,-, Hnnr Nun. - A�'a _f A"! .. _ _ _ �"�•WM Nn.« �- INEEMOi1 Eb�w—v,r FraY".,I FO_. -' _`• -tom-�� -( Exl vto•iC-ee — — -id - i �i• fa.3n •�� , NOTES TA 91 : C45E I AAEG - 100 cYC£X R.1tE A==nts 1 _ REPL. COST _ yt qN2; JOl I Y1LU= • ROT PLAN ORAPN RAAOOM O MO"tD 0 3CAlc • EXHIBIT "C" COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT __ - -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING SERVICES May 29, 1998 Mr. Mel Steves The Sorbara Company, Inc. 4380 Enterprise Ave. Naples, FL. 3104 Re: Approval of Administrative Variance 98-36, 1087 Frank Whitman Boulevard, Lot 8, Block "C", North Naples Highlands, in Section 22, Township 49 South, Range 25, Collier County, Florida, Dear Mr. Steves: Requests for variances for minor improvements to legal non -conforming structures located within a residential zoning district may be approved administratively by the Planning- Services Director for encroachments equal to or less than the existing side or rear yard encroachment. The survey provided to the Current Planning Section in the application packet clearly indicates that the existing side yard is 6.5 feet, which is one foot less than the 7.5 feet required by the Collier County Land Development Code. The proposed carport will encroach one foot into the required. side yard setback which is equal to the -existing - side yard encroachr-hent and falls .within the threshold for administrative variance requests. Current Planning staff has reviewed the administrative variance request and have found that this request meets the criteria for granting the administrative variance as outlined in the in Section 2.6.4.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Further, granting of this variance will not affect the air and light considerations of adjacent property owners. You may wish to have this letter of approval recorded in the official records of Collier County as a permanent record of the variance approval. Building Review & Permitting (941) 403-2400 Natural Resources (941) 733-2505 Code Enforcement (941) 403-2440 Planning Services '941) 403-' 300 0 'lousing & Urban Improvement (941) 403-2330 Pollution Control (941) 73? -2502 If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely i Robert J. Where, AICP Panning Services Director I State of Florida County of Collier i The foregoing Agreement Sheet was acknowledged before me this y``- day of 1998 by , who is personally known to , and who did (did not) me take n oath. � I {Signature of Notary Public) I t NOTARY PUBLIC FFICIAL N Y SEAL I Commission # CECILIA K MAR11N M Commission Expires: r40TA,RY PUBLIC SPATE OF FLORIDA My p COtvIMISSION N0. CG451612 MY COtdM b'SION EXP. APR. 27,1?99 CC: Ronald F. Nino, AICP, Current Planning Services Manager 4 EXHIBIT "D" N } O I _.�_..r..'-.. _s_. Y ;i Y�NtY 1it� FA IIC8 �r✓- ., >l Wl�r..,. T, el 0. Aa � f Int ..�--•- - 'f . TK AN-- M6P OF U.OUNQAR a 1lW NOT VALD WITHOUT THE RAISED SEAL ANO $$zNA7URE OMF FI Q$ID$Lf_rENSFD SURVEYOR AND !TAPPER THE SURVEY DEPICTED HEREON IS NOT COVERED BY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE Underground utilities were not located The bearings indicated are survey plat bearings The horizontal a=aty depicted hereon exceeds MTS 61G17.6, Suburban cla!Sttication There were no encroachments except as shown The legal description was furnished by the client and no attempt was made to verity I's' accuracy LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 9, Block C, North Naples Highlands, as Recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 12, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. FLOOD ZONE -X. ContmwdtyNo. 120067,Panel 0M,Suffix E PREPARED FOR d James V. and Elyse Paloncy CERTIFIED TO: G.E. Capital Mortgage Services Associated Land Title Group LEGEND END. Fe POB -Pckt U begivdtl PRM • Pamv 1.'NMn2 MntmeN POG- P&A d oxmrC1 m -A CM-ConaaH— M pC•PdW el .11.t- 'R. m+t-IR. Iron rod PS - RA bOA w - eon r» P9 -P." R1w-M91.1.rwa/ M-Measeod HN - HJt-.d Ua , UE-interea .vt PREPARED BY: ARTHUR C. QUINNELl, PSM 62422: P.O. BOX 524 - �� MARCO ISLAND, FL34145 ✓c r r: DATE OF SURVEY: 3I /9198 Artnur C. Quinnell, PSM EXHIBIT "E" 0 0 EXHIBIT "F11 i CD® ler uwty Growth Management Department -- Manning & Regulation Zoning Division a Zoning Services Section August 1, 2017 Mr. Michael D. Gentzle Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 Re: Zoning Verification Letter ZLTR-PL20170002429: 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard in Section 22, Township 49 South, Range 26 East of unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Property ID Number: 64260680004. Dear Mr. Gentzle: This letter is in response to a Zoning Verification Letter Application (ZLTR) submitted on June 30, 2017 in which you have requested the following information: ® That the existing site improvements constructed on the above referenced property meet all the current setback requirements and if they do not meet the setback, please confirm that they are legal nonconforming structures. The Zoning Services Section of Planning and Zoning Division has jurisdiction over zoning and land use issues. In response to your specific question, the County finds that the subject property is currently zoned Residential Single -Family (RSF-4) as provided for in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). Based on the updated survey submitted on July 19, 2017, the site improvements constructed on the property do not meet the current minimum 7.5 -foot side yard setback requirement for the RSF-4 zoning district. The survey shows the side yards measured as 4.7 feet and 6.8 feet. Staff's research indicates that an Administrative Variance was approved on May 29, 1998 which reduced the required side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 6.5 feet. This variance was attached to building permit number: 98-060437 which depicted the existing dwelling as providing a 6.5 -foot setback for both side yards. Thus, the 6.8 -foot encroachment from the west side property line can remain since it is within the 6.5 -foot side yard setback approved by the variance. However, 0 the 4.7 -foot setback from the east property line exceeds the 6.5 -foot setback established by the i variance. In addition, because the zoning at the time construction, the did not permit a 4.7 -foot side yard setback, the subject dwelling is not deemed to be legal a nonconforming structure. Therefore, a variance is required to permit a 4.7 -foot side yard setback as depicted in the survey. Disclaimer: Please be advised that the information presented in this verification letter is based on the Collier County LDC and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendment(s) to either of these documents and/or to the PUD document could affect the validity of this verification letter. it is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited to, concurrency related to the provisions of the adequate public facilities, environmental impact, and other requirements of the Collier County LDC or related ordinances. This letter represents a determination of Zoning Services Staff. Should disagree with this determination, you may request an Official Interpretation by the Planning & Zoning Director of the provisions of the Land Development Code pursuant to Sections 1.06.01A and 10.02.02F.1 of the at Code. The fee for an Official Interpretation is identified in the most recent CDED Fee Schedule Resolution as approved by the Board of County Commissioners. To obtain copies of any document referenced herein, please contact the GMD Records Room at 252-5603. The LDC may be viewed online at www.municode.com /municode library/Florida/Collier County. Validated Ordinances may be viewed online the via the Clerk of Courts website, www.collierclerk.com/Records Search/BMR Records/Boards, Minutes, Records/BMR Validated Ordinances. Should you require additional information please do not hesitate to call our office at (239) 252-2400. Sincerely, Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division —Zoning Services Section CC: ZVL Records • • • `i-tp--•--- a WY CF NAPLES isi;6n�?F lm rst) rT .� ., (7 to e - Z -2 1 " lEN1N SIAELT NCa1H -. Uj I i Rural _'NCRTN2 C- U1 cl > >CA 10 C ' to A 6 �.: d �•, 1 n .i KO Q 2 0 j N Y rh �m m z A m z - - = S o ifetr 11 ST. rICRTH - - iNEll'711- m a 5 _ c T _ x I• M --I r- > tt -r�:vi c"�'r -.•`T% ini(,•,a.c- C 3 P L —1 rMTEVJIJI STREET F—TH � y .._.�. 0:'•.1 FDV wailm STREET AY.rp -�-CC..A£TTE-iP.ANK ROAD (CR. 051) _ (ilY d< NIr.S I n�1 1 V N ; t1.0 .'a1N11A4ra^:IN+Ir.t.:.Y. 1 T 1 i a i I i 1 y 1 2 {. Rl i T Sd p 1 8 r' gh 3' 0 q2 fl 1 1 'a i i I 1 tr 1 LN zlfr—ri Ni nl o n i 5 C: z x _ � p csxsl ro { 0 c� _GIN BOARD FENCE END CLF / o.l' WEST OF LINE tltlilN t,Lr 0.2' E. OF LINE 7.1' e IN^^C. 19.sEi.O'W COUD NOT SET ARE TO CALCULATED JN OF CORNER (FIELD) of 0 0 SPA SCREENED WOOD DECK LOT 8 RESIDENCE 1067 FRANK WHITEMAN BOULEVARD t6 25.W COVERED ENTRY o 0 It 2.7' n i i r 0 cn I Y 4 I W I o W ` Z I o U 50.00' FIRC N59.57'45" W LB 4333 CLF 0.6 E. OF LNE 0 1 LOT (OCCUP 0 1 INSTR 5442396 OR 5426 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK DOC@.70 $1,575.00 REC CONS $225,000.00 PG 2791 RECORDED 8/18/2017 2:03 PM PAGES 2 OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA $18.50 Prepared by: Amber -R. Alondock, Esq. Lav Office of Conrad Willkomm, P.A. 3201 North Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34103 239-262-5303 File Number: 1711 -809 -AM Parcel Identification No.: 64260280004 Consideration: S225,000.00 EXHIBIT "G" Above This Line For Rccorduig Warranty Deed (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689 02, F S ) This Indenture made this �tr day of Au u t ��191ibethti en�alnes V. Paloncy, a single man, whose post office address is 6774 Buckingham Court, Naples,ui ]tai-3viO4, fthc o-ty-gftGgllier, State of Florida, grantor*, and Jordan T. Donini and Jacquelyn E. Coppard, lrupa od dnd `wife, whose post,n\f bee address is 1087 Frank Whiteman Blvd., Naples, FL 34103 of the County of Collier, State of Florida, grantee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for and in cons tt109 of.the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said ggantorinlhand= ftd U-said,g{antee `t' receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to tf�e said g�ant ' �arid grantees teixs� nd s ns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County,1Fiorida, \o-,kit:jILI,jl 4 Lot 8, Block C, North Napl�Iiighlands, according to tbvplat theredf.,reeorded in Plat Book 3, page 12, of the Public Records of C' oil iei, County, Florida. SUBJECT TO ad valorem and non -ad via ore real property taxes for'20r37,and subsequent years; zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed' governmental autllocitS,;'-bhtt Ending oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; and restrictions, reservation;'cel eal;emerCtM mo pii'`to�} tKe subdivision; provided, however, that none of them shall prevent the use of the property four esi4niistl spur,- -0 es TOGETHER WITH. all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, with the appurtenances, unto the said grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple forever. AND said grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires [This Space Intentionally Left Blank] 0 DoubleTime° *** OR 5426 PG 2792 *** Iii Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed anddeliveredin our presence: a�c r+,� f2 n� . ��C_ Witn ss T r ie: �a t -i i (�-2� State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknoN personally known or [Vhas produced [Notary Seal] 6=vo�6 �NC cST Co 190 EX R'arranh, Deed (Statutory FO -0 - Page'- V _(Seal) Ja s V. Pa one} P,. � me this ►.� as Rt n e I 2Y UBL�� v F ORIDA .fs' '1;011912019 1 I �'1 \ My Qbhrmission'l IE 2017 by James V. Paloncy, wfio Lj is L14 j14 / ?,r1 -i - - DoubleTime°' U C J L' The Pre -Application was waived by R. Bellows per attached correspondence. • CJ Paula Avila BellowsRay <RayBellows@colliergov.net> Monday, October 23, 2017 9:34 AM To: Francesca Passidomo Cc: KellyJohn; DeselemKay; PaulRenald Subject: FW: 1087 Frank Whiteman Blvd Good morning, In response to your voice message, I have approved a waiver from holding a preapplication meeting for a variance for the above referenced property. However, I recommend that Kay Deselem and John Kelly call you to review the issue before submittal. R4 Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Co) e -r CDou.-nty From: BellowsRay Thursday, September 07, 2017 3:00 Wrancesca PM Passidomo <fpassidomo@cyklawfirm.com> Subject: RE: 1087 Frank Whiteman Blvd I recommend that the variance be from the 7.5' LDC setback since we don't recall the LDC permitting a variance to be from another variance. I can also confirm that approval of the variance is a condition to issuance of the building permit by affidavit. Please let me know if I can be of any other assistance. R1W Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 C,,0 .a- C014TIty From: Francesca Passidomo [mailto•fpassidomo@cvklawfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 5:53 PM To: BellowsRay <RayBellows@collierBov.net> 4 Ject: 1087 Frank Whiteman Blvd Mr. Bellows, 1 Our office will be closed tomorrow due to the pending hurricane, so I will unfortunately have limited access to our system over the next few days. My initial question on this matter is whether the variance is from the 7.5' LDC setback or from the 6.5' setback approved for this structure by administrative variance 98-36. 1 also wanted to confirm that approval of the variance is a condition • to issuance of the building permit by affidavit. Thank you very much, and please be safe. Francesca FRANCESCA PASSIDOMO, Esq. The Northern Trust Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 P: 239.435.3535 F: 239.435.1218 fpassidorno@cyl<lawfirm.com Visit cyklawfirm.com to learn more about us. CYK ...� i 1 `� i +�i iy ?•�i Y x � �+r 1'+. ^ � 1.1 Y ! \:- t"i t �.i "" . � t ', , Both Francesca Passidomo and Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., intend that this message be used exclusively by the addressee(s). This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Unauthorized disclosure or use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please permanently dispose of the original message and notify Francesca Passidomo immediately at fpassidomo@cvklawfirm.com or call (239) 435-3535. Thank you. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. • 0 Nature of Petition. 1. Explanation of Request. This petition pertains to a certain improvements upon the real property with a site address of 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard (Parcel ID No. 64260280004) (the "Property'). The Property is located in the RSF-4 zoning district, fronting Frank Whiteman Boulevard between US -41 to the west and 12°i Street North to the east. An aerial of the Property is attached as Exhibit A. The single family residence located on the Property was constructed in 1954..The applicable minimum side yard at the time the residence was constructed was 7.57 . in connection with Petitioner's predecessor -in -interest's improvements to the residence (specifically, construction of a carport attached to the southwestern corner of the existing residence and conversion of the flat roof over the den to a pitched roof) (the "Minor Improvements"), a variance was administratively approved to allow the residence to continue to exist in its current location. The grant permits the structure to exist 6.5' from the side property lines, which is one (1) foot less than that required. A copy of the grant of variance is attached as Exhibit B. The variance was based on an inaccurate survey that depicted the dwelling as approximately 6.5' from the side property lines. A copy of the survey submitted with the request for variance is attached as Exhibit C. An updated survey dated July 1.9, 2017 revealed that the side yard from the eastern property line measures as 4.7'. The updated survey is attached as Exhibit D. The 4.7 foot distance exceeds the 6.5 foot setback granted by the administrative variance. Discovery of the encroachment into the eastern side yard arose from a technical objection to an open permit related to the Minor Improvements when the Property was under contract. To close- out the permit by affidavit, the updated survey was submitted with the application. Upon review of the updated survey depicting the as -built residence as 4.7' from the side property line, the County required resolution of the potential setback issue. Conclusively, in a Zoning Verification Letter dated August 1, 2017, the Collier County Zoning Manager confirmed that the residence is not non -confirming and that a variance is required to Permit the 4.7 foot setback. The Zoning Verification Letter is attached as Exhibit E. The Collier County Zoning Manager further verified by email dated September 7, 2017 that obtaining the variance is a condition to issuance of the building permit by affidavit. The email is attached as Exhibit F. Petitioner acquired the Property on August 18, 2017 in its existing configuration. The warranty deed is attached as Exhibit G. To close the open permit for the Minor Improvements, Petitioner has no practicable alternative but to request approval for the structure to remain in its current location; where it has existed without complaint or objection for over 63 years. 2. N/A 0 3. Criteria per 9.04.00. S a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. The modest size of the -Property, historic nature of the residence constructed on the Property, and fact that the residence has existed in its current location without complaint or objection since the date it was constructed in 1954 are special conditions or circumstances which are peculiar to the structure involved and which are not applicable to other structures in the same neighborhood. The variance requested is the minimum necessary to bring the structure into compliance with the Code's current development standards. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. Petitioner acquired the Property on August 18, 2017 with the Property in its current configuration. The residence was not constructed by Petitioner nor Petitioner's predecessor -in -interest. The residence has technically been noncompliant for nearly 63 years. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue 49 hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. A Iiteral interpretation of the zoning code creates practical difficulties for the applicant. In order for the Petitioner to permit the minor improvements by affidavit, an after -the - fact variance is required to allow the structure to continue to exist in its current location. A literal interpretation of the zoning code will also work an unnecessary and undue hardship on Petitioner by effectively requiring Petitioner to demolish the residence, resulting in disproportionate economic waste. The variance is not only the most practical and logical solution, but it is also the most reasonable solution. d. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. The variance requested is the minimum necessary for Petitioner to make use of the existing residence. The variance as -requested is a condition precedent to close-out the permit for conversion of the flat roof to a pitched roof, conducted upon the residence in 1998. The variance will have no effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community. e. Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings; or structures in the same zoning district. • This variance should be granted based upon the unique set of facts applicable to this variance request and granting of this variance does not set a precedent for other variance requests. The residence, the subject of this petition, was constructed in 1.954 and has continued to exist in its as -built location without complaint or objection. This petition arises from closing out a permit by affidavit, for which an updated survey revealed the setback violation. f. Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the zoning code. The residence is clearly a permitted use in the underlying zoning district. Further, the variance will not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood. The residence has been on the Property since 1954 without complaint. Finally, the variance will have no effect on the public welfare of the community. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. There are no natural or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation. h. The variance is consistent with the growth management plan. 40 Allowing the existing residence to continue to exist in its current location, where it was constructed in 1954, rather than causing disproportionate economic waste, will promote comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies related to preservation of historic homes. • 0 EXHIBIT "B" COLLIER COUNFIT GOVERNNIE, NT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL, SERVICES DIVISION PLANNING SERVICES May 29, 1998 Mr. Mel Steves The Sorbara Company, Inc. 4380 Enterprise Ave. Naples, FL. 3104 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 Re: Approval of Administrative Variance 98-36, 1087 Frank Whitman Boulevard, Lot 8, Block "C", North Naples Highlands, in Section 22, Township 49 South, Range 25, Collier County, Florida. Dear Mr. Steves: Requests for variances for minor improvements to legal non -conforming structures located within a residential zoning district may be approved administratively by the Planning. Services Director for encroachments equal to or less than the existing side or rear yard encroachment. The survey provided to the Current Planning Section in the application packet clearly indicates that the existing side yard is 6.5 feet, which is one foot less than the 7.5 feet required by the Collier County Land Development Code. The proposed carport will encroach one foot into the required. side yard setback which is equal to the existing -side yard encroachment and falls .within the threshold for administrative variance requests. Current Planning staff has reviewed the administrative variance request and have found that this request meets the criteria for granting the administrative variance as outlined in the in Section 2.6.4.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Further, granting of this variance will not affect the air and light considerations of adjacent property owners. You may wish to have this letter of approval recorded in the official records of Collier County as a permanent record of the variance approval. Building Review & Permitting !941) 403-2400 Natural Resources (941) 732-2505 Code Enforcement. (941) 403.2440 Planning Services 1941) 403-2300 Housing & Urban Improvement (941) 403-2330 Pollution Control (941) 732.2502 If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely Robert J. Mu(here, AICP Panning Services Director State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Agreement Sheet was acknowledged before me this. day of, 1998 by , who is personally known to me and who did (did not) take n oath. (Signature of Notary Public) ce'c( ((-Cu [� - NOTARY PUBLIC Commission # My Commission Expires: CC: Ronald F. Nino, AICP, Current Planning Services Manager 2 n IV) FFICIAL N TA Y SEAL CECILIA K MARTIN NOTARY PUBLIC STATE F FLORIDA COTvIMISSION NO.CC451612 MY COMMISSION EXP. APR. 271999 • L7 111131 r -C' 0 htAP of eQUjlD9BL' $Sl$YF,Y NOT VALID VATHOUT THE ReISED $F�e,L9ND SIGRATURE ijF THE &0WQ,AjICFN ED S IRS6OR AND MAPPER THE SURVEY DEPICTED HEREON IS NOT COVERED BY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE Underground utilitic: were not located The bearings Indicated are survey plot bearings The horizontal accuracy depicted hereon exceed. f4TS 61Gil-6. Suburban N•:ssifictlion There were no encroachments excePt as shown The legal description was furnished by the client and no WNW was made to verity, its' accuracy LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8, Block C, North Naples HigNartds, as Recorded In Plat Book 3, Page 12, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. FLOOD ZONE -X, Community No. 120067, Panel 0383, Sullix E PREPARED FOR a' James V. and Elyse Paloney CERTIFIED TO: G.E. Capital Mortgage Services Associated land Titlo Group LEGf'4 • FND -Fo, A Poll-Ponddb-GWq FRN-Pema°anl lKc,ekee ma -1 POC-Puddwar..,:N CFt-Conv.rrng--d PC-P°cddewva:n IR-kdlr°C. Pa-P1,tW k CK PO P RIW Right d..W re -u a°ared Wr - Nal bnd:a!, UE-tnay--.t PREPAREDBY: ARTHURC.QUINNEU,PSM112122, ,^"� MARCP.O. BOX 624 ! _ ,�j% O ISLAND. FL 34146 Jt- /�_�+' DATE OF SURVEY: 3�f91gd l/t�ar C. Quitmeil, PSM �,' :� �' —� `•.•,` S' fJE ,4 o.do' :r, uG- 1 N d JjjiL ry LSI 2L,° ..t \ -AC yP. �o Ec I I b 8't rer--w. m cud,,,.. y u59 cl'�a'ni 0 htAP of eQUjlD9BL' $Sl$YF,Y NOT VALID VATHOUT THE ReISED $F�e,L9ND SIGRATURE ijF THE &0WQ,AjICFN ED S IRS6OR AND MAPPER THE SURVEY DEPICTED HEREON IS NOT COVERED BY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE Underground utilitic: were not located The bearings Indicated are survey plot bearings The horizontal accuracy depicted hereon exceed. f4TS 61Gil-6. Suburban N•:ssifictlion There were no encroachments excePt as shown The legal description was furnished by the client and no WNW was made to verity, its' accuracy LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8, Block C, North Naples HigNartds, as Recorded In Plat Book 3, Page 12, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. FLOOD ZONE -X, Community No. 120067, Panel 0383, Sullix E PREPARED FOR a' James V. and Elyse Paloney CERTIFIED TO: G.E. Capital Mortgage Services Associated land Titlo Group LEGf'4 • FND -Fo, A Poll-Ponddb-GWq FRN-Pema°anl lKc,ekee ma -1 POC-Puddwar..,:N CFt-Conv.rrng--d PC-P°cddewva:n IR-kdlr°C. Pa-P1,tW k CK PO P RIW Right d..W re -u a°ared Wr - Nal bnd:a!, UE-tnay--.t PREPAREDBY: ARTHURC.QUINNEU,PSM112122, ,^"� MARCP.O. BOX 624 ! _ ,�j% O ISLAND. FL 34146 Jt- /�_�+' DATE OF SURVEY: 3�f91gd l/t�ar C. Quitmeil, PSM �,' :� �' —� `•.•,` mmBIT"Y' _~—_— _ / 0 0 EXHIBIT "F" Growth Management Department -- Planning & Regulation Zoning Division e Zoning Services Section August 1, 2017 Mr. Michael D. Gentzle Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 Re: Zoning Verification Letter ZLTR-PL20170002429: 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard in Section 22, Township 49 South, Range 26 East of unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Property ID Number: 64260680004. Dear Mr. Gentzle: JO This letter is in response to a Zoning Verification Letter Application (ZLTR) submitted on June 30, 2017 in which you have requested the following information: That the existing site improvements constructed on the above referenced property meet all the current setback requirements and if they do not meet the setback, please confirm that they are legal nonconforming structures. The Zoning Services Section of Planning and Zoning Division has jurisdiction over zoning and land use issues. In response to your specific question, the County finds that the subject property is currently zoned Residential Single -Family (RSF-4) as provided for in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). Based on the updated survey submitted on July 19, 2017, the site improvements constructed on the property do not meet the current minimum 7.5 -foot side yard setback requirement for the RSF-4 zoning district. The survey shows the side yards measured as 4.7 feet and 6.8 feet. Staff's research indicates that an Administrative Variance was approved on May 29, 1998 which reduced the required side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 6.5 feet. This variance was attached to building permit number: 98-060437 which depicted the existing dwelling as providing a 6.5 -foot setback for both side yards. Thus, the 6.8 -foot encroachment from the west side property line can remain since it is within the 6.5 -foot side yard setback approved by the variance. However, 0 the 4.7 -foot setback from the east property line exceeds the 6.5 -foot setback established by the • variance. In addition, because the zoning at the time construction, the did not permit a 4.7 -foot side yard setback, the subject dwelling is not deemed to be legal a nonconforming structure. Therefore, a variance is required to permit a 4.7 -foot side yard setback as depicted in the survey. Disclaimer: Please be advised that the information presented in this verification letter is based on the Collier County LDC and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendment(s) to either of these documents and/or to the PUD document could affect the validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited to, concurrency related to the provisions of the adequate public facilities, environmental impact, and other requirements of the Collier County LDC or related ordinances. This letter represents a determination of Zoning Services Staff. Should disagree with this determination, you may request an Official Interpretation by the Planning & Zoning Director of the provisions of the Land Development Code pursuant to Sections 1.06.01A and 10.02.02F.1 of the at Code. The fee for an Official Interpretation is identified in the most recent CDED Fee Schedule Resolution as approved by the Board of County Commissioners. To obtain copies of any document referenced herein, please contact the GMD Records Room at 252-5603. The LDC may be viewed online at www.municode.com /municode library/Florida/Collier County. Validated Ordinances may be viewed online the via the Clerk of Courts website, www.colliercierk.com/Records Search/BMR Records/Boards, Minutes, Records/BMR Validated Ordinances. Should you require additional information please do not hesitate to call our office at (239) 252-2400. Sincerely, -: Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division — Zoning Services Section CC: ZVL Records 0 CITY CIF IIAPLES mm R \ /� m ] mm tltkJI 0.2' E. OF LINE I o -GIN BOARD FENCE END CLF / 0.1' WEST OF LINE 3 0 0 0 Z 6.8_ ^- & 1.0' W VER COULD .NOT SET RE TO CALCULATED N OF CORNER (FIELD) Q ` i of 0 0 SPA SCREENED om WOOD DECK ori ;7' a 0 a Q U I CV I I r Q W 7 I O W v~1 Z 0 NB9'57'45"W 26.1 LOT 8 RESIDENCE 1087 FRANK WHITEMAN' BOULEVARD COVERED ENTRY A/C I UNIT 50.00' 4.7' w FIRC LB 4333 CLF 0.6' E. OF LINE 0 1 LOT (OCCUP 0 1 t✓XH 1 X1"1 '•.V" Francesca Passidomo 0m: BellowsRay <RayBellows@colliergov.net> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 3:00 PM To: Francesca Passidomo Subject: RE: 1087 Frank Whiteman Blvd I recommend that the variance be from the 7.5' LDC setback since we don't recall the LDC permitting a variance to be from another variance. I can also confirm that approval of the variance is a condition to issuance of the building permit by affidavit. Please let me know if I can be of any other assistance. may Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 C;Of1Y -V C 01-,-Kty From: Francesca Passidomo[mailto:fpassidomo@cyklawfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 5:53 PM 0 : BellowsRay <RayBellows@colliergov.net> bject: 1087 Frank Whiteman Blvd Mr. Bellows, Our office will be closed tomorrow due to the pending hurricane, so I will unfortunately have limited access to our system over the next few days. My initial question on this matter is whether the variance is from the 7.5' LDC setback or from the 6.5' setback approved for this structure by administrative variance 98-36. 1 also wanted to confirm that approval of the variance is a condition to issuance of the building permit by affidavit. Thank you very much, and please be safe. Francesca FRANCESCA PASSIDOMO, Esq. The Northern Trust Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 P: 239.435.3535 F: 239.435.1 21 8 foassirloi_no' ,cvl<lawfirrn:.corn 0isit cyklawfirm.com to learn more about S. 1 INSTR 5442396 OR 5426 PG 2791 RECORDED 8/18/2017 2:03 PM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $1,575.00 REC $18.50 CONS $225,000.00 EXHIBIT "G' Prepared by: Amber R. Mondock, Esq. Law Office of Conrad Willkomm, P.A. 3201 North Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34103 239-262-5303 File Number: 17R -809 -AM Parcel Identification No.: 64260280004 Consideration: S225,000.00 [Space Above This Linc For Recording Data] Warrant Deed (SMATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689 02, F S ) U This Indenture made this day of August 41-70 �etu-,,een :antes V. Pa[oncy, a single man, whose post office address is 6774 Buckingham Court, Naples, T04 6Afic- ua� 4. '_11 State of Florida, grantor%, and Jordan T. Donini and Jacquelyn E. Coppard, husbau'dNd wife, whose po3t�office',address is 1087 Frank Whiteman Blvd., Naples, FL 34103 of the County of Colli(gr, Statee� of Florida, grantee`, Witnesseth that said grantor, for an4 in cosi 'fa—ttionfat a sum oG TEN AND �0/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to s `id grantor-in=handb said lantee� tl}i rec t t whereof is hereby acknowledged, 1i,� , P Y Bhas granted, bargained, and sold to e sad g�anteel/adte`s��reids`and.signs prever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier Co`inlyIortdao; Lot 8, Block C, North Naples.Tiighlands, according to tl�i� lat there fXecorded in Plat Book 3, page 12, of the Public Records of C�iSMci Couuty, Florida. SUBJECT TO ad valorem and non -ad more real property taxes fo�r�`10�-7j:(nil subsequent years; zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed \b fvergmental autl�t� \ 4,z tsLding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; and restrictions, reservations . qd easerr�et is fnm�n!t Ke subdivision; provided, however, that none of them shall prevent the use of the property for resikgdit al TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, with the appurtenances, unto the said grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple forever. AND said grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. 'Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires [This Space Intentionally Left Blank] DoubleTimeo *** OR 5426 PG 2792 *** • In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness Name: Gyj i2 jdAec ;ist(e— State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknoi personally known or [has produced [Notary Seal] • Lv _(Seal) Ja s V. Pa one vled bef rt me this da�.oAt as ' ehtifica 5 � ier R/t ondgcc— ARY U�LIt ` ovary abltc{/,� TE ( FLORIDA Im3F F9277� ��#,.%frl�ed Named 1 lr s 1,011912019 ! My CoYnmi sion'J �. t. 2017 by James V. Paloncy, who U is T . DoubleTime J6ivranry Decd (S1atirtor)l FornrJ -Page 2 Ca -r C0141 ty •COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) LOT 8, BLOCK C, NORTH NAPLES HIGHLANDS, PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 12 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 64260280004 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 1087 FRANK WHITEMAN BOULEVARD • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) • SDP_- or AR or PL # ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review)] VA (Variance) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) •❑ ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) LOT 8, BLOCK C, NORTH NAPLES HIGHLANDS, PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 12 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 64260280004 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 1087 FRANK WHITEMAN BOULEVARD • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) • SDP_- or AR or PL # CQ Y c01.Hty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 0 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: )t] Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: FRANCESCA PASSIDOMO Phone: 239-435-3535 Email/Fax: FPASSIDOMO@CYKLAWFIRM.COM Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. -7�allceSca R&S16WO • Francesca Passidomo FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE • UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Core County COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE •COLLIER GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@coiliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressingpersonnel prior to pre application meeting please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review)] VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) .❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) LOT 8, BLOCK C, NORTH NAPLES HIGHLANDS, PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 12 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, orassociate with, legal description if more than one) 64260280004 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 1087 FRANK WHITEMAN BOULEVARD • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) 0 SDP_- or AR or PL # Cor ->r C01.nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE . NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: )t:l Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: FRANCESCA PASSIDOMO Phone: 239-435-3535 Email/Fax: FPASSIDOMO@CYKLAWFIRM.COM Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. -fl-V fCa 'PaJSI0(OWO • Francesca Passidomo FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: R ! t J1 I IS I=@ 0 r1 The subject improvement is existing; please see the enclosed survey. r 11 • /A -EIAs .l3A8fiS AifV4Nf108 .e9,n:1 ronnoo�nm• a vaiarn «T crv...,o..+nu r/a c��+a•g + � —(//� :ieu zurnr wn.rBn.G.vnc�+r.oVpnuv.n.n..yl:day nm.�:Yu�fz�ncnpuuJpnnr,y.cunJ. +ra rna ---" +1B Nlgr b9!!'8bC l6Cll:aiw+ld — "/—'nor xr auanus roaov u es eoe Q2iV�31f108 NVW311HM NNVNJ L80T albs Appnlj •rldnc ars'+a� ls'luCiubt �[[eL/CI/LG u:ArmlLYAb' ••/NI �Yuldan..rns npunlg r{;noS • •""" anreanre�"i�r"x'"�"v A3/Hns ANV4Nnoo .<v,nv.mxn.nxn, ov.-.:wxn �:nu naA—ZiTi•g..A -- _/// a' su mvnr wn�8u�b.vn.pr.uVpnun:n.a..y�:duy nm.*Yw.v.�nmPuoJfmm;y.np/. 6911-8bC l6i cl��mVd "' nnr x, «+a/nvs Yoxou w rs eoa Oab �31f108 Nb W311HM HNV2i� L80i znrr nP!„nfd •r f✓nv srs raa avurz UK u rcocrcrr<c Y Ja7A a,.rAs ?uj 8uPfalunS npyolg illnoS INSTR 5442396 OR 5426 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK DOC@.70 $1,575.00 REC CONS $225,000.00 to PG 2791 RECORDED 8/18/2017 2:03 PM PAGES 2 OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA $18.50 Prepared by: Amber R. Mondock, Esq. Law Office of Conrad Willkomm, P.A. 3201 North Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34103 239-262-5303 File Number: 17R -809 -AM Parcel Identification No.: 64260280004 Consideration: $225,000.00 Above This Line For Recording Warranty Deed (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689 02, F S) This Indenture made this day of Angus 0'1e end ems V. Paloncy, a single man, whose post office address is 6774 Buckingham Court, Naples, $�ci At4 6€tlie eI CMer, State of Florida, grantor*, and Jordan T. Donini and Jacquelyn E. Coppard, husb�dO �ife, whose po 1" address is 1087 Frank Whiteman Blvd., Naples, FL 34103 of the County of Colligr', 3ta�'of Florida, grantee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for an� in good and valuable considerations to sdid g has granted, bargained, and sold toe saj situate, lying and being in Collier Co n__ Lot 8, Block C, North Napl 12, of the Public Records of of .the sum of TEN lands, according to County, Florida. SUBJECT TO ad valorem and non -ad KaWrereal property taxes code and other use restrictions imposed 'Z lx mental authorx record, if any; and restrictions, reservations d esgZI 'Jr of them shall prevent the use of the property former si Nes 00 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other whereof is hereby acknowledged, aver, the following described land, in Plat Book 3, page 4/and subsequent years; zoning, building standing oil, gas and mineral interests of subdivision; provided, however, that none TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, with the appurtenances, unto the said grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple forever. AND said grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires [This Space Intentionally Left Blank] DoubleTime° *** OR 5426 PG 2792 *** • In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year fust above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: /Z - Witness Name: am Gza t m(4— Lim u State of Florida County of Collier i The foregoing instrument was acknowled ,.9 me this personally known or [has produced aoipayAs Am 'er R / a [Notary Seal] Q NO AR U LI � o aST TE F ORIS{„0 Como, F92 7Z L (Seal) J s V. Pa one as 3s 0/19/2010 �"' My &nmi sic 2017 by James V. Paloncy, who L] is r— • Marranty Deed (Statutory Form) - Page 2 DoubleTime01 INSTR 5442396 OR 5426 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK DOC@.70 $1,575.00 REC CONS $225,000.00 �J PG 2791 RECORDED 8/18/2017 2:03 PM PAGES 2 OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA $18.50 Prepared bv: Amber R. Mondock, Esq. Law Office of Conrad Willkomm, P.A. 3201 North Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34103 239-262-5303 File Number: 17R -809 -AM Parcel Identification No.: 64260280004 Consideration: $225,000.00 [Space Above This Line For Recording Data) Warranty Deed (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689 02, F S ) v - This Indenture made this day of Au�g}u} ��/ a ftm e` V. Paloncy, a single man, whose post office address is 6774 Buckingham Court, Naples,�T..3lohta' qt��C "lifer, State of Florida, grantor*, and Jordan T. Donini and Jacquelyn E. Coppard, husb4ifd whose post t:e dress is 1087 Frank Whiteman Blvd., Naples, FL 34103 of the County of Collie Sta�er of Florida, grantee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for an/ in ?ronsikta'heq ofthe mus 0 . TEN NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to sdid g h d li [�id t reci pt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to e sa t d �ta t e ! Bei,si srever, the following described land, ot situate, lying and being in Collier Cnty, to ida o- it- J{{y� I Yom. l 1 A_- LC Lot 8, Block C, North Napl ikhlands, according to t*, plat Mere, f re�orded in Plat Book 3, page 12, of the Public Records of QbI k County, Florida. -52v SUBJECT TO ad valorem and non -ad a ore real property taxes f f"017/ Zr subsequent years; zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed ° X FgTental authority;,tit;fanding oil, gas and mineral interests of �K� record, if any; and restrictions, reservations d esn�talt a subdivision; provided, however, that none of them shall prevent the use of the property for -r .ci - T - es TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, with the appurtenances, unto the said grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple forever. AND said grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires [This Space Intentionally Left Blank] DoubleTime° *** OR 5426 PG 2792 *** In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year fust above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness i:MAR M � u State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was ackno personally known or ghas produced [Notary Seal) (Seal) J s V. Pa one wledOn {+ - me this V dam of f as ' reit ier R f '� 'AR Y U LI ily bl TE F ORI A + rs�0/19/2019 117 w� My mi sic 2017 by James V. Paloncy, who L] is Warranty Deed (Statutory Form) - Page 2 DoubleTimeo r� L -A 0 • INSTR 5442396 OR 5426 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Doc@.70 $1,575.00 REC CONS $225,000.00 • • • PG 2791 RECORDED 8/18/2017 2:03 PM PAGES 2 OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA $18.50 Prepared by: Amber R. Mondock, Esq. Law Office of Conrad Willkomm, P.A. 3201 North Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34103 239-262-5303 File Number: 17R -809 -AM Parcel Identification No.: 64260280004 Consideration: $225,000.00 Above This Line For Recording Data]_ Warranty Deed (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689 02, F S) tr This Indenture made this day of Augu�,r,s �, �7 a t*tt e` V. Paloncy, a single man, whose post office address is 6774 Buckingham Court, Naples, 17 4.04- he o 't C'11jer, State of Florida, grantor*, and Jordan T. Donini and Jacquelyn E. Coppard, husbjQki; l wife, whose poste ddress is 1087 Frank Whiteman Blvd., Naples, FL 34103 of the County of Colligr, §tle of Florida, grantee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for and in good and valuable considerations to s id g has granted, bargained, and sold to tqe sai situate, lying and being in Collier Co nty,' Lot 8, Block C, North Napl 12, of the Public Records of of.the sum otTEN lands, according to County, Florida. SUBJECT TO ad valorem and non -ad ittiaiore real property taxes code and other use restrictions imposed IKbra_rental authoxi record, if any; and restrictions, reservations'a% eo of them shall prevent the use of the property for rQ ri u 'des 00 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other whereof is hereby acknowledged, ver, the following described land, in Plat Book 3, page -0 Y W And subsequent years; zoning, building :tnding oil, gas and mineral interests of subdivision; provided, however, that none TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, with the appurtenances, unto the said grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple forever. AND said grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires [This Space Intentionally Left Blank] DoubleTime° *** OR 5426 PG 2792 *** In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: /Z - Witness Name: Acis, h0 A e-sA.. (,z,_ /L /P (Seal) J s V. Pa one State of Florida - County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknowled {�e�' me this kJ da}�oT st, 2017 by James V. Paloncy, who [] is personally known or has produced _ as ' e fica�ion. aptAR qs Am 'er R 1 1 [Notary Seal] c� o� NO ARY U LIbl ST TE F OR�DA ! ( r Corprh F9 '` _ ZY dN13Ef'L ✓�-o �c]u� rNCE 19�e Exp res 0/19/2019 L� My mire. p�EfYes iO1�( Zvl�i 4 LJ H arramy Deed (Statutory Form) - Page 2 DoubleTime°1 12/4/2017 Collier County Property Appraiser Maps • —"n aw I..I uses I 4•l 1Ea Cvbel` Irtlrotluction' x u Search for Parcels by Search Results ♦ Layers 40 Lagena Print • L LA reu aaopgax: �I-xo++Iax4-xa�+Ps+l-mselxr+l�mrelsom hfp://maps.colliemppmisecwmap.aspx?sid=68 W6311&wc ver--1710191149&folic=642W2800"&msize=M 1/1 W1212018 Print Map _._. .........__._...,_...__....___._.._—................... eer......e. r« ub a.i. rreio, a we, a ire im.m�.ewo. httpJ/maps.willemppmiser.mo mapprint.aspx?pagegtle=&orient=L NDSC PE&p Np -LETTERSmin =384599.153885518minYIX7W21.388114247... 1/1 2/11/201& Prim Map http:/lmaps.wlllemppmiwnwWmapWnt.asp ?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paperLEI Mmin =394599.1538&551&minY= 75821.3&&114147... 1/1 2/12/2018 Pnnt Map http://maps.miliemppmiwnwWmapMnt.aspx?pagatitl.=&.,iant=LANDSCAPE&paper—LETTER&r =394599.15388551&minY=875821.388114747... 1/1 2'22C',a Print Map lOW. COYyr Courcy PmpaMAPPniax. NTila1N Ciller County PmPeMPpgeWrie m bpm'Ialig IM1a moataqurele aria upbGeb iMdmabn.rowamnaes eRprecsea wimpliM eT gwNM t," am Wnaw,la —. or m imam�auuaa. • hgpl/maps.mlliemppmis nwWmappnnt.asp ?pagetitle=&oner¢=LANPSCAPE&paper—LET R&mtnX=3945Sg.l 3 51&m(nY=675521.mll4747._. IM ?/12/2015 Pont Map ._.._..._..._.___.__..._.._.__..._..._.....,._..e,,........,....�. ,. ��.�,.a....�...a mrm.em neuro, m �», w lm mm»remuoo. hUpltmaps.mllllemppmisermo mappnnLaspxTpagetitle=&Ment=LANDSCAPE&pap ,LETTER&miNX=354589.153555518mInV-675521.355114767_. 1/1 0 MQl p a mWX0 a2 11 0 0a. . E Z. 0 Is r,I0 U3 15, ag U) 00 ? - ;; . Z V 0 if R cm 2 o M L) 0ul 0 C3 ll� CL oo� IL mm4w z c - c 4c 0 co 0 0 0 ed LMU 'Zo W — idC.) 0 0 k Lu a) E T- 0 s E E c IL 0 ul E a3 Q R = Ir r: in LU ;� W OR Z LU LL U) 0 z 4D U) 0 V5 S c � z 0 8 w UJ UJ N 2 m LU (M ca LL 2) z 0: IL 0 a) :3 2 E 0 IL 0 LX LLI 'D m ui 0 0- M (3n -IIJJ -i of0ui LL. LIL 1 0 0 ,071 C) 0) CYK4001 Tarniami Trail Norlh, Suile 300 Naples, Florida 34103 T:239.413 .3535 1 F: 239.435.1218 Writers Email: .(ptrssidonro(alci,klauf rm.com December 4, 2017 Collier County Growth Management Department Attn: C. James Sabo, AICP 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Variance; PL20170003718; 1087 Frank Whiteman Blvd. Dear Mr. Sabo, This correspondence is our formal response to comments provided by County Staff on November 30, 2017. Responses to staff comments have been provided in bold. Zoning Review: Reviewed By: James Sabo Email: JamesSabo@colliergov.net #: (239) 252-2708 Correction Comment 1: Zoning and land use of adjacent properties, Insufficient, additional zoning districts required C-1, C-4, and C-5 need to be listed and detailed on the. application. RESPONSE: Please see revised Application Form. Correction Comment 2: Date of purchase by the property owner, Insufficient, the new property owner for the folio number is different than the applicant listed on the application page. RESPONSE: Please see enclosed Warranty Deed. Correction Comment 4: An 8.5 x 11 graphic location map of the site, Insufficient, graphic location map not provided in an 8.5 x 11 format. RESPONSE: Please see enclosed aerial. is cyklawfirm.com December 4, 2017 Page 2 of 2 County Attorney Review: Reviewed By: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Email: heidiashton ikoIliergov.net Phone #: (239) 252-8773 Correction Comment 1: Miscellaneous Corrections: Please provide the affidavit of representation signed by Jacquelyn E. Coppard, since she is listed as a co -applicant. RESPONSE: Please see enclosed Affidavit. In addition, per your request, we have enclosed permitting information for improvements located upon the subject property. Esq. cyklawfirm.com • • • 0 • • Cof�tev Got ntY COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY INFORMATION _ I Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (if space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: 64260280004 Section/Township/Range: 2� 49 / 25 Subdivision: North Naples Highlands Unit: ,N/A Lot: 8 Block: C Metes & Bounds Description: Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Total Acreage: .15 1087 Frank Whiteman Boulevard ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE I Zoning Land Use N RMF -6 Urban Residential Subdistrict S RSF-4 Urban Residential Subdistrict E RSF-4 Urban Residential Subdistrict W C-4; C-5 Urban Residential Subdistrict Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: RSF-4 *Per attached Grant of Administrative Front: 25 Corner Lot: Yes EJ No 0 Variance 98-36 dated May 29, 1998, Side: 7.5' Waterfront Lot: Yes ❑ No Q the side yard was reduced to 6.5' Rear: 25' Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 4/11/2017 Page 2 of 6 INSTR 5442396 OR 5426 PG 2791 RECORDED 8/18/2017 2:03 PM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $1,575.00 REC $18.50 CONS $225,000.00 • Prepared bv: Amber R. Mondock, Esq. Law Office of Conrad Willkomm, P.A. 3201 North Tamiarni Trail Naples, FL 34103 239-262-5303 File Number: 17R -809 -AM Parcel Identification No.: 64260280004 Consideration: 5225,000.00 Above This Line For Recording Data) Warranty Deed (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689 02, F S) v - This Indenture made this day of Au jst ,7kt,%VC9n�7amess V. Paloncy; a single man, whose post office address is 6774 Buclungham Court, Naples, F3,c�4D4�"f the C-ouul�CA tier, State of Florida, grantor, and Jordan T. Donini and Jacquelyn E. Coppard, huP �rr_4atnti wife, whose post pffiI ddress is 1087 Frank Whiteman Blvd., Naples, FL 34103 of the County of Collies, Stale�of Florida, grantee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for an to�onsille ation of - c usemof' TEN 4M 14,0/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to s id g�hqtonin hanc ' a>\ b , said,W; ntee,-tl} t rec�ipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to tt�e sa'd g •ant !a rant e s,3ei •s hn�d..1 signs forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier Cu,tjin to rda o- it:)J i Lot 8, Block C, North Nap] Highlands, according to t}fgCplat teredtrecorded in Plat Book 3, page 12, of the Public Records of iei County, Ilorida. &._ MV J SUBJECT TO ad valorem and non -ad 3}ore)n real property taxes foj. 202-7 anti subsequent years; zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposedli governmental authority.;„out Landing oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; and restrictions, reservations Arid ea''ser�`r�er�ts mm{�ii lisubdivision; provided, however, that none of them shall prevent the use of the property for esi enliW ur• o es. TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described premises, with the appurtenances, unto the said grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple forever. AND said grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. ° "Grantor” and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires [This Space Intentionally Left Blank] DoubleTime° AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20170003718 Jordan T. Donini and Jacquelyn E. Co pard name), as title, if 1 applicable) of (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicantQcontract purchaserFland that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize FRANCESCAPASStooMO to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then isuse the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. - .........- Signature Date lgnature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing i strument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on �? �( (date) by � r.1*, \�It. P s 1Ai, S -)�cQ W,� Inn �• Cc,,ppaw--, C (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as W -! A who is personally known to me or who has produced , 1,-V (type of identification) as identification. STAMPISEAL gnature of Notary Public ,•ot; 0 0 Permit 'Tracking and Inspection COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT HISTORY REPORT PERMIT NBR: 970004176 JOB DE SC: A/C REPLACEMENT STATUS: VOID JOB LOCATION: 1087 FRANK WHITEMAN BLVD NA FOLIO NUMBER: 0000064260280004 SUBDIVISION: 1313 /North Naples Highlands BLOCK: C LOT: 8 MASTER NBR: 0 TRS: 49-25-22 TAZ: X COA: FLOOD ZONE: X OWNER NAME: PALONCY, JIM JOB PHONE: CERT NBR: 16193 DBA: BOB'S AIR CONDITIONING-REF,INC JOB VALUE: $0.00 CONTACT NAME: BOBBY PHILIPS CONTACT PHONE: (941)455-1949 SETBACKS: FRONT: REAR: LEFT: RIGHT: SPECIAL: UNIT: TRACT: NONE WATER: SEWER: 03/21/1997 03/21/1997 03/21/1997 10/15/1997 0 U FEE )ULE: FEE FEE STATUS DESCRIPTION WAIVE AMOUN1DAT ENTER CODE a E • 08BPNP POSTED BLDG PERMITS - NAPLES 08MFSG POSTED MICROFILM SURCHARGE O6REIN I PENDING REINSPECTION I 06REIN1 PENDING REINSPECTION I N $36.00 N $2.00 N $25.00 N $25.00 0 80 04/18/1997 NEVINS_H FINAL 301 ME MECHANICAL A/C 0 04/18/1997 4/18/97 no one home 'O1 FINAL 0 MECHANICAL A/C 301 ME FINAL0 MECHANICAL A/C 301 FINAL 0 MECHANICAL A/C 0 80 04/18/1997 NEVINS_H C(0049-)° • 0 • Permit 'Tracking and Inspection • COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT HISTORY REPORT PERMIT NBR: 98060437 JOB DESC: CONVERT FLAT ROOF & ADD CARPORT STATUS: VOID JOB LOCATION: 1087 FRANK WHITEMAN BLVD FOLIO NUMBER: 0000064260280004 SUBDIVISION: 1313 / North Naples Highlands BLOCK: C LOT: 8 MASTER NBR: 0 TRS: 49 25 22 TAZ: 84 COA: FLOOD ZONE: X OWNER NAME: PALONCY, JAMES V=& ELYSE JOB PHONE: CERT NBR: 16351 DBA: THE SORBARA COMPANY JOB VALUE: $26,000.00 CONTACT NAME: GEORGE SORBARA CONTACT PHONE: (941)262-6990 SETBACKS: FRONT: 25.00 REAR: 25.00 LEFT: 7.50 RIGHT: 7.50 SPECIAL: ADM. APPROVED VARIANCE 98-36 ATTACHED TO PLANS UNIT: TRACT: NONE WATER: SEWER: 06/05/1998 06/16/1998 07/02/1998 02/01/1999 10294 ACTIVE 06/16/1998 CANCEL RF SUNCOAST ROOFING OF NAPLES, INC ubPermits: ERMIT STATUS TYPE CL+'RT NBR DBA JOB DESC 08BPNP POSTED BLDG PERMITS - NAPLES N $185.00 08MFSG POSTED MICROFILM SURCHARGE N $2.00 08BACR POSTED BLDG. PERMIT APP. FEE CREDIT N ($36.00) 08BAPP POSTED BLDG. PERMIT APPLICATION FEE N $36.00 on History: REQ CLASS DESCRIPTION/REMARKS PRI PRI RE REQ ILRES CODE RES INSPECTOR DATE KEOHANE M 111 RF 108 ST FRAMING 0 08/05/1998 90 08/05/1998 KEOHANE M 111 RF FRAMING DRY IN ONLY 0 08/04/1998 91 08/04/1998 KEOHANE M _ FRAMING 099 ST BOOK 2443 PAGE 0 07/23/1998 90 07/23/1998 CERON J 1791 100 ST FRAMING 0 07/23/1998 90 07/23/1998 CERON_J 106 ST FRAMING POST OKAY 0 07/28/1998 91 07/28/1998 KEOHANE M _ 107 ST FRAMING 0 08/04/1998 90 08/04/1998 KEOHANE_M 108 ST FRAMING 0 08/04/1998 75 08/04/1998 AIRS 109 ST FRAMING 0 113 ST FRAMING 0 115 ST FRAMING 0 122 SS FRAMING 0 133 ST FRAMING 0 134 RF FRAMING 0 • L 0 2-6 IY7 a')z 9 33� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT } C'0'\f\il \f"i'1' IaEVI:LOP�IL=N"i' ANI`) ENVIRONME;N"1 AL SF_.RVWES DIVISION' Ikrr;c:hoe Dr. • Naple,,. Florida =4104 • 210-403-2400 o FAX 1-39411.;-233-1 DATE:f PERMITS BY AFFIDAVIT The Florida 13uildins Code permits the Building" Official to accept an application for a building permit by a sworn affidavit from it registered architect or engineer. Section 105.14 of the Florida Building Code 1(H-14 Permit issued on basis of an affidavit. Whenever a permit is issued in reliance upon an affidavit or whenever the work to be covered b), it permit involves installation under conditions which, in the opinion of the building official, are hazardous or complex, the building official shall require that the architect or engineer who signed the affidavit or prepared the drawings or computations shall supervise such work. In addition, they shall be responsible for conformity to the penrtit, provide copies of inspection reports as inspections are performed, and upon completion make and file with the building official written affidavit that the work has been done in conformity to the reviewed plans and with the structural provisions of the technical codes. In the event such architect or engineer is not available, the owner shall employ in his stead it competent person or agency whose qualifications are reviewed by the building official. The building official shall ensure that any person conducting plans review is qualified as a plans examiner under Part XII of Chapter 468, Florida Statutes, and that any person conducting inspections is qualified as it building inspector under Part 111 of Chaptcr 468, Florida Statutes. The Architect or en21necr shall submit such affidavits using the attached outlines for their request. 1. Building Permit by Affidavit 2. Construction Affidavit 3. Certificate of Occupancy by Affidavit 4. Certificate of Completion by Affidavit 5. inspection Reports by Affidavit Building Director Collier County Building Department 0 BUILDING PERMITS BY AFFIDAVIT an Mull� C Architect or Engineer Duly licensed and registered %vith the State of f=lorida. Registration # y� GG�Z,-l____ hereby certify that I have reviewed the plans and specifications submitted for License #_�L!�L �D� e 7 S� Name of" Contractor D.I3.A. _ Name of Company for the construction of a----- I'ype of Structure located at: _� � G � / -77� Address of Construction The above application and construction documents conform to the requirements of the Florida Building Code — Building, Plumbing. Gas, Mechanical, Electrical. the Collier County floodplain Management Ordinance, the Collicr Count -y Land Development code, the Collier County Building Administrative Ordinance, (#F2002-01), the Collier County Contractor Licensing Ordinance, including all other relevant laws, policies, codes or ordinances. All construction and inspections shall be in conformance with the above codes and Ordinances and be performed and verified by the architect or engineer or record who Shall submit signed and sealed inspection reports for the record upon completion to the Building Official. Signa re AFFIX SEAL • 0 0 - • CONSTRUCTION AFFIDAVIT the of record, Dame Architect or Engineer Registration for permit # - for the construction of (a) 7/0 1-3 located at � -�- hereby certify that I have Address inspected all construction for the above named permit. I further certify that the construction is in accordance with submitted plans and specifications and meets all requirements of the Florida Building Code — Building, Plumbing, Gas. Mechanical. Electrical. and all other codes and ordinances as greed in the Building Permit Affidavit. rUTT\ SEAL Si-�,.nature N. CERTIFICATE RTIFI+CATE ®F COMPLETION BY AFFIDAVIT the � amc —_1_%��-1 of record, Architect or Engineer Registration ;r � for permit fnr thr construction of (a) ��1 L7Q� located ai W-J--/—J-�_��hereby ceiiifies the above structure :Address ` , d VG -4:3 is in accordance with all requirements in the I3uildin` Permit Affidavit: and, as such, request the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. Signature AFFIX stmt_ 0 • • CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BY AF'F'IDAVIT 7/J� _16t'i�� __ the 742 of record, Name Architect or Engineer Registration n _ C� for permit T for the construction of* (a) ���-lam o� located at _Z 6 9:2 7? %—M*YV1 hereby certifies the above structure Address is in accordance with all requirementS in the Building Permit Affidavit; and. as such, request the issuance of a Certificate of Completion. Sianalurc _- 0 .VT --IX SEAL STRUCTURAL INSPECTION REPORT BY AFFIDAVIT Permit If_ Project Address: Date of Inspection:_ /4 o // 7 Job Description:_ -:t)&-y-J- _lam-lJ.t_T� p --- Contractor:_4Y-2 _�DL�/ -7pti(S _ p __ Phone 7_53r � Owner's Name Insp __ _ Phone Code Description Pass Fall Incomplete Comments 100 Footer/Foundation f 7 f r—__1 101 Pile Caps 102 Grade Beam 103 Floating Slab 104 Tie Beam 105 Shear Wall 106 Columns 107 Sheathing Metal Fascia 108 Framing 110 Tie Down 111 Roofing in Progress 115 Final Building 118 Lintel Beam 119 Fill Cells 120 Flood Vent Relief 121 Elevated/Epicore Deck 124 Steel Stairway 125 Elevator Pit 128 Break Away Wall 130 Tenant Sep Framing 131 Tenant Sep Drywall 132 Tenant Sep Insulation 133 Monolithic Slab 134 Final Roofing 135 Final Shutters 136 Impact Glass Framing 137 Int. Design Pressures Report Appro , by: (Seal) Date: �� l/ 7 —T -- NOTE: Submit inspection report to the Collier County Building Department after each inspection is completed. 41 PLUMBING / MECH / POOL INSPECTION REPORT BY AFFIDAVIT Permit f#-------------. Project Address:D�j7_t�✓^—�G G�(f��- -✓LT7 Lt✓ S Date of Inspection:../_fo /f � Job Contractor:_R�/----Phone ; Z�'j�-7 �,�^ l' �? — Owner's Name -L, ��� _ __ Phone #1 : 2,3 2 �3 7.3 Insp Pass Fait Incomplete Comments Code Description 200 Plumbing Rough 2.01 Plumbing Tub Set 202 Plumbing Stack Test 203 Sewer Tap 204 Final Plumbing 109 Insulation 1/ 40 300 Mechanical Rough 301 Final Mechanical A/C 302 Mechanical Piping 400 Gas Rough 401 Final Gas 700 Pool Steel e Ground 701 Final Pool 702 Pool Deck Report Appr ved by: (Seal) Date: /O / NOTE: Submit inspection report to [tie Collier County Building Department after each inspection is completed. C7 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION REPORT BY AFFIDAVIT Permit __ Project Address:/,z -?—/—= Date of inspection: Job Description:�E7t% /i Contractor: s—id11�_��s_ -- __.._ Phone Ov ner's Name --------Phone n� : Cl 'ZG_f = 53-73 _.. Insp Pass Fail Incomplete Comments Code Description 501 Electric Rough F ---fl- 502 Final Electric 506 Underground Wiring 508 Low Voltage Rough 509 Low Voltage Final 510 Security Rough 511 Final Security 512 Audio Rough 513 Final Audio 519 Lighting Rough 0 ` 520 Final Lighting 400 Gas Rough 401 Final Gas ;KmilinspeC by: (Seal) Date: � /O /j -7 n report to the Collier County Building Department atter each inspection is completed. 0 • • Permit Application Status - CityView Portal Permit Application Status In order to schedule inspections, you need to be signed in. / Note: YOU can collapse and expand individual sections by clicking the header of the section you rush to collapse/expand. — Summary Page 1 of 2 GMD Public Portal Application Number: PIZBD20170729337 Application Type: Building Application Status: Rejected Property Ov.ner's Full Name: PALONCY, LANES V Category of Work: Alteration Occupancy Code: Residential, One and Two Family New or Guest House Description of `::'ork: "PERMIT BY AFFIDAVIT" FOR DEN CONSTRUCTED BACK ON 1998, (ROOF _ Permits (Click to See Reviews) COMPLETED UNDER PERPIIT 98060437) -_— ... 1087 FRANK WHITMAN Locations: 6/4260280004 Outstanding Fees `—------------�—�"y 1087 Frank VIhitentan BLVD Application Date: 07/27/2017 Expiration Date: 01/31/2018 1-2 Family or Conlin: 1-2 Family — Contacts Property Owner: PALONCY, JAMES V, Address: 1087 FRANK WHITEMAN BLVD CAFFEY ARCHITECTURE, INC. (DBA) ARCHITECTURAL SOLUTIONS, INC., Contractor: Address: 1216 10TH STREET Il, Phone:(239) 793-0460 ----- Date Paid License Status Qualifier: LAURA L. CAFFEY, Address: 568 9TH STREET SOUTH UNIT 154, Phone: Paid (239)793-0460 Structural Fee -Residential -Application License Status Applicant: Tatiana Gust, Address:6627 Willow Park Drive _ Permits (Click to See Reviews) (Valuation=<55000) — - 1----- Permit Number: PRBD2017072933701 Fees j Paid Fees Amount -------- Paid Owing ----- Date Paid I Zoning Review - Application $50.00 550.00 I Paid l 07/7.7/2017 Structural Fee -Residential -Application i $50.00'T $50.00 I Paid 07— /27/2017, (Valuation=<55000) — - 1----- -_— ... -- Owing Date Paid Outstanding Fees `—------------�—�"y Amount Paid -� _ —� No outstanding fees. Inspector: fl/A Totals: $100.001_ $100.001 $0.00 PLEASE DO NOT SUBMIT ANY PAYMENTS UNTIL A COLLIER COUNTY PAYMENT SLIP IS DISTRIBUTED Inspections Inspection Outcome Requested Scheduled Date Inspected -_----- -- ---------_....-..-_----------_.._ ._._............ .-- 9 ----------------------'- I 115 - Building Fina[ Peudin-'. inspector: I Email: NIA permit by affidavit 108 - Framing i pending -. I __ Inspector. t Email: - /A 100 - Footings Penning 1-1-Uldil: Inspector: fl/A http:Hcvportal.col liergov,netlCityViewWeb/Permit/StatL[sRefel'ence?refereiiceNumbcr=PR... 8/11/2017 Permit Application Status - CityView Portal 110 - Tie Down Inspector: Pending --_-- ----- - ------ i Email: 1•1/A 135 -Shutters Final Inspector: --__-- Pending Email: N/A and Perrnitting 109 - Insulation 501 - Electrical Rough Inspector; - Inspector: Pending--�-----_--_--- Email: N/A Pending Email• N/A Condition Type: r502 - Electrical Final Inspector: Pending j Email: N/A ' - Conditions Condition Status Department Description Notice or Commencement Open Building Review 1 > Notice of Commencement ^ and Perrnitting { Condition Type: Inspection Hold BDT-Blower Door Test Plot Required I Building Review I Waiting for Blower Door -rest documentation. Send ' and Permitting ( test documentation to PermittingPianReviewr CollierGov. Net and include your permit number in the emails subject line. Condition Type: CO Hold Permit Number: PRBD2O170729337O1 Permit by Affidavit Ur j Open—_---�-y Perrnit by Affidavit Ltr Condition Type: CO Hold - Documents & Images Page 2 of 2 llttp:Hcvpoi-tal.colIiergov.net/CityViewWeb/Permit/StatLIsRefereiice?refei-eiiceNujnbei-=l'R... 8/11/2017 11 • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION / BUILDING REVIEW & INSPECTION 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples FL 34104 * Phone (239) 252-2400 Outstanding Corrections Date: August 04, 2017 PERMIT NO: PRBD2017072933701 Contact Name: CAFFEY ARCHITECTURE, INC. (DBA) APPLICATION NO: PRBD20170729337 ARCHITECTURAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Address: 1216 10TH STREET N JOB SITE ADDRESS: 1087 Frank Whiteman BLVD City, State Zip: NAPLES, FL 34102 Fax: (239) 649-7338 Email: Dear Applicant: Plans submitted with the referenced permit have been reviewed. We are unable to approve your permit application for the reason(s) indicated below. For Applications Submitted on Paper. Review the corrections below to identify each document you will need to submit. All corrections must be clouded. C Corrections to paper documents must be submitted in person; the GMD office receiving corrections is open until 4:30 pm. Submit 3 sets of corrected documents. Submit 3 copies of the Letter of Response summarizing the changes made to address each correction comment below. JOB DESCRIPTION: 'PERMIT BY AFFIDAVIT' FOR DEN CONSTRUCTED BACK ON 1998, (ROOF COMPLETED UNDER IRMIT 98060437) 87 FRANK WHITMAN Rejected Review: Zoning Review Reviewed By: Gabriela Castro Phone:239-252-2408 Email:GabrielaCastro@colliergov.net Correction Comment 1: Please provide a copy of administrtive variance 98-36. Correction Comment 2: Please clarify side setback site plan provided on Al shows 6.5, boundary survey shows 4.7 please clarify. ATTENTION: Collier County Plan Review and Inspections routinely reviews all outstanding permit applications in order to determine their status. The review process includes appropriate responses from the permit applicant when the permit cannot be approved. When the applicant is advised of deficiencies and does not respond within 180 days with corrected plans or an appeal to the Code Enforcement Board, the permit application will be canceled as per Collier County Ordinance 2002-01, Section, 104.5.9.9 to 904.5.9.4 (as amended). 0 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER CERTIFICATE O This Certificate is issued pursuant to (tie requirements of the Florida Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances of the county regulating building construction or use. For the following: PERMIT NBR: CDP9806043701 CO NBR: STATUS: Finaled CO TYPE: COMP ADDRESS: 1087 Frank Whiteman BLVD SUBDIVISION: LOT: BLOCK: ISSUED DATE: August 15, 2017 SLUC CODE: UTILITY COMPANY: JOB DESC: CONVERT FLAT ROOF & ADD CARPORT 1087 FRANK WI-tITEMAN BLVD OWNER: PALONCY, JAMES V LEGAL DESCRIPTION N NAPLES HIGHLANDS BLK C LOT 8 T.R.S.: NUMBER OF METERS: Note: A new certificate is required if the use of the building or premises is changed, or if alterations are made to the building or property described. A new certificate voids any certificate or prior date. n LJ • Permit 'Tracking and Inspection COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT HISTORY REPORT PERMIT NBR: 2010081266 JOB DESC: A/C REPL 2.5 -TON COND & AH STATUS: VOID JOB LOCATION: 1087 FRANK WHITEMAN BLVD FOLIO NUMBER: 0000064260280004 SUBDIVISION: 1313 / North Naples Highlands BLOCK: C LOT: 8 MASTER NBR: TRS: TAZ: 147 COA: FLOOD ZONE: X OWNER NAME: PALONCY, JAMES V=& ELYSE JOB PHONE: CERT NBR: 25956 DBA: WIEGOLD & SONS, INC. JOB VALUE: $4,600.00 CONTACT NAME: DAVID CONTACT PHONE: (239)597-8774 SETBACKS: FRONT: REAR: LEFT: RIGHT: SPECIAL: UNIT: TRACT: NONE 08/23/2010 08/23/2010 08/23/2010 02/19/2011 0 FEE SCHEDULE: FEESTATUS DESCRIPTION WAIVE AMOUNT ENTER CODE DUE DATE 0 • 06REIN I PENDING REINSPECTION 1 08BPNP POSTED BLDG PERMITS - NAPLES 08MFSG POSTED MICROFILM SURCHARGE U 0 Inspection History: REQ CLASS DESCRIPTION/REMARKS iPRI IREDAQTI•; FINAL 301 ME MECHANICAL A/C 0 09/21/2010 no answerr 10:00 FINAL MECHANICAL A/C PM please owner not 301 ME home till after 12:00 0 09/27/2010 call for access 261- 9373 301.7 inside cover missing at main electrical panel FINAL 301 ME MECHANICAL A/C 0 09/16/2010 no one home at 9:50 301 ME FINAL 0 02/18/2011 MECHANICAL A/C N $75.00 N $110.00 08/23/2010 N $0.00 08/23/2010 RES TIRES CODE DATE 81 09/21/2010 WARFIELDJAMES 92 09/27/2010 TIMOTHYRIVARD 80 09/16/2010 TIMOTI-IYRIVARD