Agenda 10/13/2015 Item # 9B10/13/2015 9.B.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing
be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an
Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 08-41, the First Assembly Ministries Education &
Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, as amended, to remove two-family dwellings from permitted
principal uses, and add detached and attached garages, and daycare services for children to
permitted accessory uses in Tract G; to reduce the minimum floor area for multi - family dwelling
units from 850 square feet to 800 square feet; to remove the prohibition on one bedroom non -
church- related dwelling units; to add a cross reference to a new Essential Services Personnel
Housing Agreement; to remove affordable housing developer commitments and transfer them to
the new Essential Services Personnel Housing Agreement; to add new design standards for
residential development on Tract G; to add a new transportation developer commitment relating to
reservation of right -of -way along the southern portion of the PUD; to add a new planning developer
commitment relating to disclosure of Swamp Buggy Races; and to revise the PUD Master Plan to
relocate the existing access point near the southeast corner of the property to align with the entry
for the Lord's Way RPUD to the south for the PUD property consisting of 69f acres located on the
east side of Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), approximately 1/2 mile north of Rattlesnake- Hammock Rd.
(C.R. 864), in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and by
providing an effective date. (Petition Number PUDA- PL20140002461). (This item is a companion
to Item 11A.)
OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff's findings
and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning
Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding the
petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in
order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERATIONS: The petitioner is requesting an amendment to the First Assembly
Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, which was approved by Ordinance
Number 08-41, on July 2, 2008 (Please see Attachment).
The MPUD is presently approved for a mixture of residential units, community facilities. and
church - related uses in a campus -type setting, including: 296 multi - family units, a 2,200 seat
church auditorium, a 200 seat chapel, a 300 student school (K -12), a 300 child /adult care facility,
a 249 bed care unit facility, recreational vehicle parking, an outdoor recreational area, and
accessory uses. Only a portion of the land uses permitted by the subject MPUD have been
developed.
The petitioner is requesting modifications to Tract G, Residential, only, which affects 23.6±
acres of the 68.78± acre MPUD, as well as the Affordable Housing Commitments.
The Petitioner proposes the following revisions to the PUD to:
• Reduce minimum residential multi- family unit sizes from 850 square feet to 800 square
feet (Exhibit B of the proposed Ordinance);
• Add Daycare Services for children to permitted accessory uses in Tract G;
Packet Page -157-
10/13/2015 9.B.
• Clarify that the 147 affordable- workforce housing units are for Essential Service
Personnel (ESP) in Collier County (Exhibit F of the proposed Ordinance);
• Revise the Affordable Housing GMP (Growth Management Plan) Commitments section
of the PUD (Exhibit F of the proposed Ordinance) to be silent with regard to the time
periods that dwelling units will be reserved for persons providing essential services.
These time limits have been reduced from 60 days to 14 days and are included in the ESP
Housing Agreement and the agreement is referenced in the PUD;
• Remove language regarding phasing of the units, (these phases no longer apply) (Exhibit
F of the proposed Ordinance);
• Remove the prohibition on one bedroom units (Exhibit F of the proposed Ordinance);
• Remove a commitment regarding the demolition of mobile homes, as this has been
completed;
• Remove a transportation commitment tying phasing of the project to completion of
improvements to Davis Blvd., as these improvements have been made (Exhibit F of the
proposed Ordinance);
• Revise Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan, to align the westernmost access to the property
with the access to the Lords Way RPUD; to remove the "pool & cabana area "; and to add
a note stating that the location and acreage of lakes (Tract D) are preliminary;
• Remove all references to "two- family" dwelling units, as the project as proposed only
includes multi - family uses;
• Clarify that detached garages are allowed accessory structures and that development
standards that apply to carports also apply to detached garages (Exhibit B of the proposed
Ordinance); and
• Add a list of amenities and construction elements for the residential development (Exhibit
F of the proposed Ordinance).
There is a companion Essential Services Personnel Housing Agreement to be heard at the same
Board meeting. If the companion Agreement is not approved, this PUDA cannot be approved.
FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD amendment by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier
County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of
development. However, if the PUD amendment is approved, a portion of the land could be
developed and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities.
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the
impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as
needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in
order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local
development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated
Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the
Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a
building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by
application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the
improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria
used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. /00�
Packet Page -158-
10/13/2015 93.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE):
Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed PUD Amendment consistent with the Future
Land Use Element. Please refer to the attached Consistency Review Memorandum dated July
21, 2015.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The
CCPC heard petition PUDA- PL20140002461, First Assembly Ministries Education and
Rehabilitation Campus Mixed -use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) on August 6, 2015 and
by a vote of 7 to 0 recommended to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of
approval subject to the following stipulations:
1. Incorporate the Agent's PUD revisions into the PUD document as presented at the CCPC
hearing.
2. Revise the definition of Essential Services Personnel.
3. Revise the PUD boundary language to depict a 35 -foot setback plus 1 -foot of building
height over 35 feet up to a maximum of 50 feet along the southern boundary of Tract G.
4. Revise the Master Plan to depict a future right -of -way width of 40 feet with a l 0 -foot
wide multi -use pathway for The Lord's Way.
5. The fence shall be located within the middle of the landscape buffer and not within the
future right -of -way.
6. Modify transportation section 3B to add the County Attorney's revisions.
7. Remove the Staff recommendations as they are no longer needed.
8. The smallest housing unit minimum floor area shall be 800 square feet.
There have been no letters of objection received.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is an amendment to the existing First Assembly
Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed -Use PUD (Ordinance 08 -41, as
amended). The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed amendment is
consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County
Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denying the amendment, to determine that such denial
would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding
that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below.
Criteria for PUD Amendment:
Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for
approval or not.
Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development
proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic
and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements,
contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as
they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation
Packet Page -159-
10/13/2015 9. B.
and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained
at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only
after consultation with the County Attorney.
3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUDA with the goals, objectives and policies
of the Growth Management Plan.
4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which
conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on
design, and buffering and screening requirements.
5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve
the development?
6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of
assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and
private.
7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to
accommodate expansion.
8. Consider: Conformity with PUDA regulations, or as to desirable modifications of
such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications
are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations.
9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and
future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan?
10. Will the proposed PUD Amendment be appropriate considering the existing land use
pattern?
11. Would the requested PUD Amendment result in the possible creation of an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts?
12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to
existing conditions on the property proposed for change.
13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the
proposed amendment necessary.
14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood?
15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create
types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak
Packet Page -160-
10/13/2015 9.B.
^ volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction
phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety?
16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem?
17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas?
18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area?
19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations?
20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege
to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ( "reasonably ") be used in
accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...)
22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
county?
23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the
proposed use in districts already permitting such use.
24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site
alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range
of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification.
25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD
Amendment on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent
with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan
and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public
Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.] 06, art.II], as amended.
26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD Amendment request
that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the
public health, safety, and welfare?
The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the
written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive
Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the
BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by
the County Attorney's Office. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires
an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (SAS)
Packet Page -161-
10/13/2015 9. B.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC and further
recommends that the Board approves the request for PUDA- PL20140002461, First Assembly
Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus Mixed -use Planned Unit Development (MPUD).
Prepared by: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Division,
Growth Management Department
Attachments: 1) Staff Report, 2) Proposed PUD Ordinance, 3) Ordinance 08-41, 4) Location
Map, 5) Master Plan, 6) Density Map, 7) Consistency Review Memorandum dated July 21,
2015, 8) NIM Summary, 9) Letters of Support, 10) Legal Ad, and 11) Application —go to:
littp: / /www.colIiergov. net /ftp /A.QendaSept2215 /GrowthMsrnt /Application for First Assembly
8- 21- 15.pdf
Packet Page -162-
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 9.9.13.
10/13/2015 9.B.
Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in.
Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 08 -41, the First
Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, as amended, to remove two -
family dwellings from permitted principal uses, and add detached and attached garages, and
daycare services for children to permitted accessory uses in Tract G; to reduce the minimum
floor area for multi - family dwelling units from 850 square feet to 800 square feet; to remove
the prohibition on one bedroom non - church - related dwelling units; to add a cross reference to
a new Essential Services Personnel Housing Agreement; to remove affordable housing
developer commitments and transfer them to the new Essential Services Personnel Housing
Agreement; to add new design standards for residential development on Tract G; to add a new
transportation developer commitment relating to reservation of right -of -way along the
southern portion of the PUD; to add a new planning developer commitment relating to
disclosure of Swamp Buggy Races; and to revise the PUD Master Plan to relocate the existing
access point near the southeast corner of the property to align with the entry for the Lord's
Way RPUD to the south for the PUD property consisting of 69± acres located on the east side of
Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), approximately 1/2 mile north of Rattlesnake- Hammock Rd. (C.R. 864), in
Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and by providing an
effective date. (Petition Number PUDA- PL20140002461). (This item is a companion to Item
11D. The companion item must be approved or this item will be withdrawn or continued to
another BCC meeting.)
Meeting Date: 10/13/2015
Prepared By
Name: GundlachNancy
Title: Planner, Principal, Growth Management Department
8/21/2015 11:42:58 AM
Submitted by
Title: Planner, Principal, Growth Management Department
Name: GundlachNancy
Packet Page -163-
8/21/2015 11:43:00 AM
Approved By
10/13/2015 9. B.
Name: BellowsRay
Title: Manager - Planning, Growth Management Department
Date: 8/21/2015 6:08:15 PM
Name: BosiMichael
Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning, Growth Management Department
Date: 8/27/2015 8:50:32 AM
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, Growth Management Department
Date: 8/27/2015 4:09:16 PM
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, Growth Management Department
Date: 8/27/2015 4:1 l :11 PM
Name: MarcellaJeanne
Title: Executive Secretary, Growth Management Department
Date: 8/31/2015 1:13:42 PM
Narne: StoneScott
Title: Assistant County Attorney, CAO Land Use/Transportation
Date: 9/25/2015 12:44:58 PM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 9/28/2015 8:33:55 AM
Name: IsacksonMark
Title: Division Director - Corp Fin & Mgmt Svc, Office of Management & Budget
Date: 9/28/2015 1:3522 PM
Name: CasalanguidaNick
Title: Deputy County Manager, County Managers Office
Date: 10/2/2015 10:14:24 AM
Packet Page -164-
/1
10/13/2015 9. B.
AGENDA ITEM 9 -D
Coer County
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ZONING SERVICES DIVISION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: AUGUST 6, 2015
SUBJECT: PETITION PUDA- PL20140002461, FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES
EDUCATION & REHABILITATION CAMPUS MPUD (MIXED -USE
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) (COMPANION ITEM TO ESP HOUSING
AGREEMENT)
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Owner:
Mr. Fred W. Mundie, Jr.
Marco Vision and Stewardship Trust
12336 Tamiami Trail East 4001
Naples, FL 34113
Agents:
Mr, Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP
Hole Montes, Inc.
950 Encore Way
Naples, FL 34110
REOUESTED ACTION:
Contract Purchaser:
Mr. David Torres, Manager
Lord's Way Apartments, LLC
7742 Alico Road
Fort Myers, FL 33912
Mr. Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire
Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A.
4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300
Naples, FL 34103
The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider amending
Ordinance Number 08 -41, the First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus
MPUD, as amended, to remove two - family dwellings from permitted principal uses, and add
detached and attached garages, and daycare services for children to permitted accessory uses in
Tract G; to reduce the minimum floor area for multi - family dwelling units from 850 square feet to
750 square feet; to remove the prohibition on one bedroom non - church - related dwelling units; to
release developer commitments relating to transportation and affordable housing; and to revise the
PUD Master Plan to relocate the existing access point near the southeast corner of the property to
align with the entry for The Lord's Way RPUD to the south and to remove provisions relating to
affordable housing which will be moved to a new Affordable Housing Agreement that will be a
companion to this PUDA.
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, PUDA- PL20140002461
July 27, 2015
pane 1 of 1 F
Packet Page -165-
10/13/2015 9. B.
Z
z
0
N
N
msOL W, 7 0�
- AL
■
•
r'
z
a
�
n
3
F Z
Sl
� O
0
9
4
g
S
its
$
1
B�
N
8 Eg
tl
8
��G
1�R
AYdVYYl lri3
FF[�QQ.11C
ffi
j
�
waa�
oaanarbe aoa
9i�
ri dL
..��
^�'+ yx{
b+ n '�9
�z
h
$S�
3
I
S
li Zp
}y5q
Iul
S
g ay
MaoaB'iwUYS
iM'1 T'BYS
�a u
n.
aounaru
fffiiia
g sv
A
Ywejmws
wvaweYi
-
�.
~
Y1NYS � v�
g �'�
jI
'NrlOW YtlVaaY9
S
Packet Page
■
•
r'
z
a
�¢ F
n
Q �d
U �y
0�
W Oq I�
4
W Q_
C) W g
z cn
0a
Q Q _
D
q
f
V/ I
1
W
m � � S3NVl VUN31OVH
��.... B�� ,andk 9NINOZ
S�a'mm<°c�
z
z�
oz
z
'4 ,b-- .x`- 'l^v'Y ate~--- ,�,�- -C—i -• �'M- W F
O
w
------ ----------------
AVM !0 -1H Td'!
W'm Ssv msDao. i e i 13
--
W
u
Q +
};
J
mnN aae.m
ffi
rn o
I {�
X
-� W
rl~
; F �
rn
W
�L
AVM- JD-LHD1N
9NUWVd 5'LYIp
•l'd•d c$ I
0350d6tld I
I
F <a
; I 15,�j
rW
V /
/ i
Q
0
r
U)
0
1:
PzQV W
____
---------------
J
L. - -_
T N zm
I
y
LL
ii' ✓�
��
L 9 6 �J'3
10/13/2015 9.B.
< z_
z < 15 C>
f II �WzoGiof
II �
_
I' b4 -x" 5 g
o
w W
:�! �l
U O
c�sIl i 1 ¢ x
F% it 111 I
O
W °n I�I IltIj � OM
xis•- !�,; 1 + i E d
3
I il+ 1
I I , I I 020
Y III IIV�� aL Zn
N
O
C
w{ Q
�., W II i ill l ooh
J 4Z4 IW1��J II Q110bI
3 JN 1 �If IN N
J
I
(I l W
- si--
�r
-
erv_ _ i 7
�Gs� -� If I
mnN aae.m
ffi
rn o
...�.
rl~
; F �
W
6NKUS
AVM- JD-LHD1N
9NUWVd 5'LYIp
•l'd•d c$ I
0350d6tld I
I
F <a
; I 15,�j
gill
------- ----_- -{�_ ,�-`
0
-- -- ° -�\
n, 1
0
PzQV W
____
---------------
J
L. - -_
T N zm
I
y
LL
+ m �
_
L :n•
Ij W
1
4
'
Rzd r
II +
a
d
Jk 15
K}C�
W
a �
` b
fie'
I
I F-CCK'
gGggrg.r5r,
®
`II ZU
I
L
I �'1N
Packet Page -167 -
Proposed Master Plan
rn o
...�.
rl~
�O
n
W
------- ----_- -{�_ ,�-`
0
-- -- ° -�\
n, 1
0
Q� - - - 10, JL:)Vd.L
LT
F-
L-9
dam;
LU
AVM AD—IHD 7.s J
uj
pe F-
Z X
.: LU
A
<
F -
ij
LL.
40
Av"o-two •1CI
Moved swo MSOM)kw
1 0/1 3/201 5 9.B.
L
U
<
to
, ilm
i� 4 0,
I Ica L
LL
I.
3
Is yl
It
It
OGOO:
..... . ...... ..
Zia.,
1.56 W3
-----------------
------------
--77
Packet Page -168-
Currenx master rian
10/13/2015 9.B.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The 69± acre subject property is located on the east side of Collier Blvd. (CR 951), approximately
1/2 mile north of Rattlesnake - Hammock Road. (CR 864), at the northeast corner of Collier
Boulevard (CR 95 1) and The Lord's Way in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,
Collier County, Florida. (Please see the Location Map on the previous pages.)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The petitioner is requesting an amendment to the First Assembly Ministries Education &
Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, which was approved by Ordinance Number 08 -41, on July 22,
2008. (Please see Attachment B: Ordinance Number 08 -41.)
The MPUD is presently approved for a mixture of multi - family residential units, community
facilities and church - related uses in a campus -type setting, including: 296 multi - family units, a
2200 seat church auditorium, 200 seat chapel, 300 student school (K -12), 300 child/adult care
facility, 249 bed care unit facility, recreational vehicle parking, an outdoor recreational area, and
accessory uses. Only a portion of the land uses permitted by the subject MPUD have been
developed,
The petitioner is requesting modifications to Tract G only, which affects 23.6± acres of the 68.78±
acre MPUD as well as the Affordable Housing Commitments.
The Petitioner proposes the following revisions to the PUD to:
• Reduce minimum unit sizes from 850 square feet to 750 square feet (Exhibit B);
• Add Daycare Services for children to permitted accessory uses in Tract G;
• Clarify that the 147 affordable- workforce housing units are for Essential Service Personnel
(ESP) in Collier County (Exhibit F);
• Revise the Affordable Housing GMP Commitments section of the PUD (Exhibit F) to be
silent with regard to the time periods that dwelling units will be reserved for persons
providing essential services. These time limits have been reduced from 60 days to 14 days
and are included in the ESP Housing Agreement and the agreement is referenced in the
PUD;
• Remove Ianguage regarding phasing of the units, (these phases no longer apply) (Exhibit
F);
• Remove the prohibition on one bedroom units (Exhibit F);
• Remove a commitment regarding the demolition of mobile homes, as this has been
completed;
• Remove a transportation commitment tying phasing of the project to completion of
improvements to Davis Blvd., as these improvements have been made (Exhibit F);
• Revise Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan, to align the westernmost access to the property with
the access to the Lords Way RPUD; to remove the "pool & cabana area"; and to add a note
stating that the location and acreage of lakes (Tract D) are preliminary;
• Remove all references to "two - family" dwelling units, as the project as proposed only
.-o includes multi - family uses;
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, PUDA- PL20140002461
July 27, 2015
Packet Page -169-
10/13/2015 9.B.
Clarify that detached garages are allowed accessory structures and that development
standards that apply to carports also apply to detached garages (Exhibit B); and
• Add a list of amenities and construction elements for the residential development (Exhibit
F).
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North: undeveloped land with an (A) Agricultural zoning designation and undeveloped residential
portion of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD with a density of .88 dwelling units per acre
East: Swamp Buggy Grounds, and the recently approved residential and public services portion
of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD with a density of .88 dwelling units per acre
South: The Lord's Way right-of—way, then undeveloped land with an (A) Agricultural zoning
designation and The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD with a density of 2.5 dwelling units per
acre
West: 100 -foot wide Henderson Creek Canal right -of -way, then Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and
Naples Lake Country Club, with a density of 1.56 dwelling units per acre
AERIAL PHOTO
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, PUDA- PL20140002461
July 27, 2015
Packet Page -170-
10/13/2015 93.
GROWTH -TW dAGEMENT PLAN' (GNIP) CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): Please refer to the attached Consistency Review
Memorandum dated April 24, 2015 and updated on July 21, 2015.
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petitioner's application
and has determined that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this
PUD Amendment within the 5 -year planning period and found it consistent with the applicable
policies of the transportation element.
Based on the above analysis, Comprehensive Planning staff finds the proposed PUD amendment
consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP).
ANALYSIS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon
which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.S.,
Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings "), and
Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as
"Rezone Findings "), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The
CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use
the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these
le subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning and Land Development Review
Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses:
Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD
document to address environmental concerns and has found that there are no revisions to the
environmental components of the PUD.
Transportation Review: Transportation Division staff has reviewed the petition request, the PUD
document and Master Plan for right -of -way and access issues and is recommending approval.
Utility Revielil: Utilities Department Staff has reviewed this petition and recommends approval.
Zoning and Latin Development Review: As previously stated, the proposed revisions affect Tract
G, the residential tract of the subject PUD and the Affordable Housing GMP Commitments. The
development standards contained in Exhibit B of the PUD document have been modified to reduce
the minimum floor area from 850 square feet to 750 square feet and the two - family structures have
been removed. The minimum principal structure setback from internal paved vehicular use areas
has been modified to exclude attached and detached garages. Detached garages have also been
added to the development standard distance from a principal structure. This should have little
impact on the surrounding neighborhood.
The maximum building height of 52 -foot zoned and 56 feet actual remains unchanged. The
previously approved PUD Boundary setbacks of 35 feet plus one foot for each foot of building
height over 35 feet also remains the same. However, the Master Plan for the subject Tract G has
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, PUDA- PL20140002461
July 27, 2015
Packet Page -171-
10/13/2015 9.B.
changed. The previously approved Master Plan showed an approximately 60 -foot wide parking
area and a reduced 10 -foot wide Type D Landscape Buffer (from 20 feet through a deviation)
adjacent to the southern boundary. The proposed Master Plan does not show a parking area along
the southern boundary. In addition, Footnote number 1 has been added to the Development
Standards Table reducing the PUD setback along The Lord's Way from "35 feet plus one foot for
each foot of building height over 35 feet" to 10 feet should The Lord's Way require up to 55 feet
for a right -of -way taking. (Please note: LDC Section 9.03.07 C.2 is applicable to front yards post
development.)
Staff is concerned by the incompatibility created by a permitted 56 -foot height, 4 -story multi-
family building that is located within 10 feet of The Lord's Way right -of -way, a public road that
connects to the 2,262± acre Hacienda Lakes MPUD and to the future Benfield Road. Furthermore,
the incompatibility is exacerbated by the reduction of a required 20 -foot wide landscape buffer to a
10 -foot width. A recently submitted SDP Master Plan and related documents depict a 4 -story
multi - family building 10 feet from the southern boundary. (Please see Attachment H: SDP (Site
Development Plan) Related Documents.) Staff has made recommendations that:
The minimum setback for principal structures from the southern MPUD boundary shall be
measured from the future right -of -way line (and added as a clarifying footnote to Exhibit B
Table I) ;
2. The Type D Landscape Buffer along The Lord's Way shall be restored to the minimum
code prescribed 20 -foot width on Tract G. (This will require the deletion of Deviation n
number 1 from Ordinance number 08 -41).
As previously stated, the transportation commitment tying phasing of the project to completion of
improvements to Davis Boulevard has been removed, as these improvements have been made.
The petitioner has added commitments related to the number of one - bedroom units (20% of the
total number of units), the number of garages, amenities and construction elements.
As illustrated in the aerial photograph located on page 6 of the staff report, the surrounding zoning
discussion of this staff report, and the Master Plan, the site is adjacent to residential and
agricultural uses to the north, east, south and west. The proposed residential land use should be
compatible with the neighborhood with the exception of the Swamp Buggy Grounds. To address
the noise issues related to the Swamp Buggy Grounds, the petitioner has added a disclosure
commitment to Exhibit F of the PUD document.
Several of the Affordable Housing criteria has been removed from the subject PUD document and
relocated to an ESP Housing Agreement. The previously approved 147 affordable - workforce and
market rate housing units are proposed to be available per the companion ESP Housing
Agreement. The period of time that the units will be reserved for ESP is proposed to change from
60 days to 2 weeks and is reflected in the ESP Housing Agreement.
No additional deviations are being sought as part of this PUD amendment petition.
Letters of support of this land use petition have been received. (Please see Attachment.)
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, PUDA- PE20140002461
July 27, 2015
Packet Page -172-
10/13/2015 9.B.
REZONE FINDINGS:
LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and
recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show
that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the
following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires
the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the
additional criteria as also noted below: Rezone findings are designated as RZ and PUD findings
are designated as PUD. (Staffs responses to these criteria are provided in non -bold font):
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies
and future land use map and the elements of the GMP.
The proposed development is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the
Growth Management Plan (GMP) for Collier County and all other relevant goals, objectives and
policies of the GMP.
2. The existing land use pattern.
This amendment will not affect the existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern will
remain the same.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts.
Not applicable. The district boundary is existing and established.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposed for change.
The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3 above.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment
necessary.
The proposed change is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the
LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to modify the development
standards for Tract G and to modify the Affordable Housing Commitments.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the
neighborhood.
As previously stated, the maximum zoned building height is 52 feet and 56 feet actual height. The
previously approved PUD Boundary setbacks of 35 feet plus one foot for each foot of building
height over 35 feet remains the same. However, the Master Plan for the subject Tract G has
changed. The previously approved Master Plan showed an approximately 60 -foot wide parking
area and a reduced 10 -foot wide Type D Landscape Buffer (from 20 feet through a deviation)
adjacent to the southern boundary. The proposed Master Plan does not show the parking area
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitabon Campus MPUD, PUDA- PL20140002461
July 27, 2015
Packet Page -173-
10/13/2 01 5 9. B.
along the southern boundary. Furthermore, a recently submitted SDP Master Plan depicts a multi-
family building 10 feet from the southern boundary. Staff is concerned about the potential
negative impact of a 4- story, 56 -foot building located 10 feet from a right -of -way that is an ingress
and egress route to the Hacienda Lakes MPUD /DRI. Staff has made recommendations that:
1. The minimum setback for principal structures from the southern MPUD boundary shall be
measured from the future right -of -way line (and added as a clarifying footnote to Exhibit B
Table I) ;
2. The Type D Landscape Buffer along The Lord's Way shall be restored to the minimum
code prescribed 20 -foot width on Tract G. (This will require the deletion of Deviation
number 1 from Ordinance number 08 -41).
If the above staff recommendations are adopted, then the proposed change should not adversely
affect living conditions in the neighborhood.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or
create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak
volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases
of the development, or otherwise affect public safety.
The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project. The project's
development must also comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations and
operational improvements, including Exhibit F Developer Commitments when development
approvals are sought at time of Site Development Plan (SDP) or Subdivision Platting (PPL)
review.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem.
The proposed development will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject
to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
The proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent
area.
Staff is of the opinion this PUD amendment will not adversely impact property values. However,
zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value.
11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of
adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations.
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, PUDA- PL20140002461
July 27, 2015
Packet Page -174-
10/13/2015 9.B.
Most of the property surrounding the subject site is partially developed. The basic premise
underlying all of the development standards in the Land Development Code is that their sound
application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision
process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to
improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should
not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
owner as contrasted with the public welfare.
The proposed development will comply with the Growth Management Plan which is a public
policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive
Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege.
Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because
actions that are consistent with plans are in the public interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance
with existing zoning.
The subject property can be developed within existing zoning.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the
county.
As previously stated, staff is of the opinion that the proposed change to the southern boundary of
Tract G from a parking area to a building within 10 feet of a future right -of -way is out of scale
with the neighborhood.
15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in
districts already permitting such use.
Not applicable. The proposed uses are already permitted at the subject site.
lb. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would
be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the
proposed zoning classification.
Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require site alteration and these
residential sites will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development
regulations during the building permit process.
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services
consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and
implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance.
The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate
Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, PUDA- PL20140002461
July 27, 2D15
Packet Page -175-
10/13/2015 9. B.
the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, This petition has been reviewed by county staff that
is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff
has concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments so that the impacts to the
Level of Service will be minimized.
18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall
deem important in the protection of the public health, safety and welfare.
To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing.
PUD FINDINGS:
LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the Planning
Commission shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following
criteria:"
1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to
physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,
water, and other utilities.
The currently approved type and pattern of development was determined to be suitable when the
subject PUD was previously approved
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, n
contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they
may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and
maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public
expense.
Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office,
demonstrate unified control of the property and roadway access to the subject site. Additionally,
the development will be required to gain platting and/or site development plan approval. Both
processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and
maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and
policies of the GMP.
County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives
and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis,
staff is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP,
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include
restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening
requirements.
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, PUDA- PL20140002461
July 27, 2015
Packet Page -176-
10/13/2015 9.B.
As described in the Analysis Section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that proposed
change to the southern boundary of Tract G from a parking area to a building within 10 feet of a
future right -of -way is not compatible with the external neighborhood.
5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum 30 percent requirement of
the LDC.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e.,
GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element
consistency review. The project's development must also comply with all other applicable
concurrency management regulations and operational improvements when development approvals
are sought at time of Site Development Plan (SDP) review.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
This proposed PUD Amendment will not adversely impact the previous BCC finding that the
I—N subject property and surrounding areas can accommodate expansion.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in
the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting
public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.
This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and
deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for
the most similar conventional zoning district. With the exception of the previously approved Type
D Landscape Buffer Deviation (from a 20 -foot wide Type D Landscape Buffer to a 10 -foot wide
Landscape Buffer), the development standards in this PUD are similar to those standards and the
petitioner is not seeking any additional deviations as part of the rezoning action.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM):
The agent/applicant duly noticed and held the required NIM on May 5, 2015. For further
information, please see Attachment C: NIM Summary.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for Petition PUDA- PL20140002461,
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, revised on July 24, 2015.
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, PUDA- PL20140002461
July 27, 2015
Packet Page -177-
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the
forward Petition PUDA- PL20140002461, First Assembly
Campus MPUD to the Board of County Commissioners
subject to the following stipulations:
10/13/2015 9.B.
Collier County Planning Commission
Ministries Education & Rehabilitation
with a recommendation of approval
1. The minimum setback for principal structures from the southern MPUD boundary shall be
measured from the future right -of -way line (and added as a clarifying footnote to Exhibit B
Table I) ;
2. The Type D Landscape Buffer along The Lord's Way shall be restored to the minimum
code prescribed 20 -foot width on Tract G. (This will require the deletion of Deviation
number 1 from Ordinance number 08 -41).
Attachments:
Attachment A:
Proposed PUD Ordinance
Attachment B:
Ordinance 08 -41
Attachment C:
Consistency Review Memorandum
Attachment D:
NIM Summary
Attachment E:
ESP Housing Agreement
Attachment F:
Density Map
Attachment G:
Letter of Support
Attachment H:
SDP Related Documents
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, PUDA- PL20140002461
July 27, 2015
Packet Page -178-
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER
ZONING DIVISION
MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR
ZONING DIVISION
A M�ES FRE!NCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
DAVID S. WILKISON, P.E. DEPARTMENT HEAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, PUDA-PL20140002461
July 27, 2015
Packet Page -179-
10/13/2015 9.B.
1( 7 74/ �
DATE
DATE
-7
/6 / -
ATE
DATE
10/13/2015 9. B.
ORDINANCE NO. 15 -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE
NUMBER 08 -41, THE FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION
& REHABILITATION CAMPUS MPUD, AS AMENDED, TO REMOVE
TWO- FAMILY DWELLINGS FROM PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES,
AND ADD DETACHED AND ATTACHED GARAGES, AND
DAYCARE SERVICES FOR CHILDREN TO PERMITTED
ACCESSORY USES IN TRACT G; TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM
FLOOR AREA FOR MULTI - FAMILY DWELLING UNITS FROM 850
SQUARE FEET TO 800 SQUARE FEET; TO REMOVE THE
PROHIBITION ON ONE BEDROOM NON - CHURCH - RELATED
DWELLING UNITS; TO ADD A CROSS REFERENCE TO A NEW
ESSENTIAL SERVICES PERSONNEL HOUSING AGREEMENT; TO
REMOVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
AND TRANSFER THEM TO THE NEW ESSENTIAL SERVICES
PERSONNEL HOUSING AGREEMENT; TO ADD NEW DESIGN
STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON TRACT G;
TO ADD A NEW TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPER COMMITMENT
RELATING TO RESERVATION OF RIGHT -OF -WAY ALONG THE
SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PUD; TO ADD A NEW PLANNING
DEVELOPER COMMITMENT RELATING TO DISCLOSURE OF
SWAMP BUGGY RACES; AND TO REVISE THE PUD MASTER
PLAN TO RELOCATE THE EXISTING ACCESS POINT NEAR THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY TO ALIGN WITH THE
ENTRY FOR THE LORD'S WAY RPUD TO THE SOUTH FOR THE
PUD PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 69f ACRES LOCATED ON THE
EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BLVD. (C.R. 951), APPROXIMATELY 1/2
MILE NORTH OF RATTLESNAKE - HAMMOCK RD. (C.R. 864), IN
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
[PETITION NUMBER PUDA- PL201400024611
WHEREAS, on July 22, 2008, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance
No. 08 -41, the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use
Planned Unit Development, in accordance with the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development
document attached thereto (the "MPUD Document "); and
WHEREAS, Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Lord's Way
Apartments, LLC, has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend Ordinance No.
08 -41, the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned
Unit Development, and the MPUD Document.
Words stfuek thrett are deleted, words underlined are added.
Page 1 of 10
Revised 8/19/15 Packet Page -180-
15- CPS -01418
10/13/2015 9.B.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO SECTION II OF THE MPUD DOCUMENT
ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 08 -41, THE FIRST
ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION
CAMPUS MPUD
Section II, entitled "Residential Permitted Uses (Tract G)," of the MPUD Document
attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 08 -41, is hereby amended as follows:
II. RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES (TRACT G)
No building, structure or part thereof located on Tract G, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used,
in whole or part, for other than shown below:
A. PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES:
Multiple - family and two fimnily dwellings.
2. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of
permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by the
�. process outlined in the LDC.
B. ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES:
Recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of a residential development,
including but not limited to a walk path, docks, community center building and office,
pool and playgrounds.
2. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the residential permitted uses
within this MPUD Ordinance including garages, detached and attached, swimming
pools, boat docks, recreational buildings which may include daycare services for
children who reside in the community, and a tot lot for children.
3. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of
permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by the
process outlined in the LDC.
C. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY:
A maximum of 296 multi - family units are allowed on Tract G that may inelude three two
SECTION TWO: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT B OF THE MPUD DOCUMENT
ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 0841, THE FIRST
ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION
CAMPUS MPUD
Words stnae k thfe,,gh are deleted, words underlined are added.
Page 2 of 10
Revised 8/19/15 Packet Page -181-
15- CPS -01418
10/13/2015 9.B.
Exhibit R, entitled "Residential Development Standards," of the MPT JD Document
attached to Ordinance No. 08 -41, is hereby amended as follows:
EXHIBIT B
LISTING OF TABLES
TABLE I - RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY PILL DING TWO F A MrT v DWELLING
UNITS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES,
FOR TRACT G
TABLE I
RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY INCLUDING TWO F A MII v DWELLING UNITS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
For Tract G
A.
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
MULTI- FAMILY
DWELLING UNITSA
MINIMUM FRONT YARD
25 FEET
MINIMUM SIDE YARD
NONE, AS LONG AS MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
STRUCTURES IS MET
MINIMUM REAR YARD
25 FEET
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA
M 800 SQUARE FEET PER DWELLING UNIT
MINIMUM SETBACK FROM NORTHERN;
S� AND EASTERN MPUD
BOUNDARY
35 FEET PLUS ONE FOOT FOR EACH FOOT OF BUILDING
HEIGHT OVER 35 FEET
MINIMUM SETBACK FROM SOUTHERN
35 FEET PLUS ONE FOOT FOR EACH FOOT OF BUILDING
MPUD BOUNDARY
HEIGHT OVER 35 FEET, NOT TO EXCEED 50 FEET
MINIMUM YARDS FROM INTERNAL PAVED
VEHICULAR USE AREAS
10 FEET UNLESS ATTACHED TO CARPORTS, G 4 R 4 C,99 OR
PORTICOS, OR GARAGES. WHETHER ATTACHED OR
DETACHED*
MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
STRUCTURES
GREATER THAN 20 FEET
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
MULTI - FAMILY STRUCTURES - -- FOUR STORIES NOT TO
EXCEED 52 FEET AS ZONED AND NOT TO EXCEED 56
FEET ACTUAL
TW9 P.41A LY STRUCT TWO S T vDipC NOT
-ums
PERT
EXCEED ED 25 PERT A S 7llNED Oi P NOT TO EXCEED 34
FR9T A GTT T A i
i-�TTCVCVTTn
MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM LAKES
20 FEET
Words st-Fuek thfeugh are deleted, words underlined are added.
Page 3 of 10
Revised 8/19/15 Packet Page -182 -
15-CPS -01418
10/13/2015 9.B.
* This standard does not apply to travel ways that include public rights -of -way but may include parking areas and driveways.
See Exhibit B1 typical sketch for distance of principal uses, carports, garages or porticos from travel ways.
GENERAL: Except as provided for herein all criteria shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary
lines or between structures Condominium residential cooperative and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be
utilized for determining development standards.
B. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY
A maximum of 296 multi - family units are allowed on Tract G.
TABLE II
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
For Tract G
I1
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
MINIMUM FRONT YARD
20 FEET
NONE AS LONG AS MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
MINIMUM SIDE YARD
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES IS MET
MINIMUM REAR YARD
20 FEET
20 FEET OR 10 FEET FOR CARPORTS OR DETACHED
DISTANCE FROM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE
GARAGES
TWO STORIES NOT TO EXCEED 25 FEET AS ZONED AND
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
NOT TO EXCEED 35 FEET ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHTS
MINIMUM SETBACK FROM MPUD
25 FEET
BOUNDARY
MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM INTERNAL
10 FEET UNLESS ATTACHED TO CARPORTS OR
PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREAS*
GARAGES, WHETHER ATTACHED OR DETACHED*
MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM LAKES
20 FEET
�. * See Exhibit B I depicting location of carport areas adjacent to vehicular use area/travel ways.
Words struek Offeugh are deleted, words underlined are added.
Page 4of10
Revised 8/19/15 Packet Page -183 -
15-CPS -01418
10/13/2015 9.B.
SECTION THREE: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT E OF THE MPUD DOCUMENT
ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 08 -41, THE FIRST j
ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION
CAMPUS MPUD
Exhibit E, entitled "List of Requested Deviations from Land Development Code (LDC),"
of the MPUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 08 -41, is hereby amended as follows:
EXHIBIT E
LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS
FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC)
1. Deviation No.1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, which requires a 20 foot wide Type D
buffer along The Lord's Way, to allow this buffer to be reduced from 20 feet to 10 feet in width along
Tract G, the Multi- Family Tract. If a wall or fence is installed along the southern property boundary, it
shall be located in the middle of the landscape buffer. This deviation will also allow the existing 10 foot
wide buffer to remain on Tract A adjacent to The Lord's Way prior to the widening of The Lord's Way
and to allow this Type D buffer to remain 10 feet in width after the widening of The Lord's Way and be
relocated to the north of the existing sidewalk. The plantings in the 10 foot Type D buffer area on Tract A
shall be located just to the north of the sidewalk. (See Exhibit 1, The Lord's Way Typical Cross Sections
for Tract A and G.)
4.C. 44) Deviation No. 4C 4B seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.1, which requires
a 6 foot wide sidewalk and bike lane along C.R. 951, an arterial roadway, to allow an existing 7
foot side sidewalk along a portion of the C.R. 951 road frontage on property belonging to First
Assembly Ministries to satisfy this requirement or by providing money in lieu of providing a
sidewalk. A connection will be provided from the sidewalk on the The Lord's Way to the
sidewalk which the County will construct on C.R. 951 east of the canal at the intersection of The
Lord's Way and C.R. 951.
SECTION FOUR: AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBIT F OF THE MPUD DOCUMENT
ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 08 -41, THE FIRST
Words stfaelc 4ffeugh are deleted, words underlined are added.
Page 5 of 10
Revised 8/19/15 Packet Page -184 -
15-CPS -01418
10/13/2015 9.B.
ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION
CAMPUS MPUD
Exhibit F, entitled "List of Developer Commitments," of the MPUD Document attached
to Ordinance No. 08 -41, is hereby amended as follows:
EXHIBIT F
LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
AFFORDABLE HOUSING GMP COMMITMENTS
A. A minimum of 147 of the 296 affordable- workforce and market rate housing units, as
they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential
services in Collier County. Essential services personnel (ESP) eis defined as follows:
Those individuals employed in the community as teachers educators, other school
district employees community college and university employees, police and fire
personnel health care personnel skilled building trades personnel (as listed in the U.S.
Department of Labor General Decision No FL 150012 dated 3/20/2015, for building
construction in Collier County Florida as may be amended or superceded from time to
time), and government employees.in the- I.DC� fuFther- defined in the County's T Beal
14eusing ^ ssist ne-A ni The units will be offered for sale or for rent, pursuant to the
provisions of the approved ESP Housing Agreement between the Developer and the
Coun The period ef time that the dwelling units will be r-esen,ed fer- per-sells previdin
esssential- seFvires will be a minimufa e€ 60 days f m the date of the issuanee of "
eei4ifiraate ef eeeupaney fer- the initial effefing and 60 days ffem the date a unit is
In addition to the requirements of the approved ESP Housing
Agreement, the The developer shall comply with the following a
commitments upon approval of the SDP for Tract G, the multi - family tract.
C. No more than 57 market rate dwelling units shall be constructed prior to the construction
of all affordable- workforce housing (AWH) dwelling units_ and the f llewing phasin
phase. sehedule shall appiy, heweN,ef, more AW14 units may be ineluded in any one Development of the pfejeet will be phased, as fellew6i
Phase !A 60 cSVM units =6 SJ fnaFket RAe units — 117 ESP ,,n
Phase 1 B 30 ffiafket fate ESP units
Phase 2 149 heusing units
D. The maximum primary occupancy per dwelling unit in the 296 non - church - related
dwelling units
shall be as follows:
1. One bedroom units — three occupants.
2.47 Two bedroom units — five occupants.
3.2-. Three bedroom units— seven occupants.
Words stpara 4ffeugh are deleted, words underlined are added.
Page 6of10
Revised 8/19/15 Packet Page -185 -
15-CPS -01418
10/13/2015 9. B.
E_ . The number of one - bedroom units shall be limited to no more than 20 percent of the total
number of units provided.
F A minimum of 75 of the required parking spaces shall be met via enclosed garages
G. Residential development on Tract G shall conform with the following design standards:
1. Amenities. The following amenities shall be provided in association with any residential
development:
a. Resort-style swimming pool;
b. Clubhouse:
c. Outdoor barbeque facilities,
d. Fitness center,
e. Dog Rark:
f. Children's playground area/tot lot:
g. Tennis court or bocce ball court or Vickleball court:
h. Gated entry: and
i. On -site propeM management if developed as a rental community.
2. Construction. The following shall be required:
a. Concrete Masonry Unit construction or concrete construction, and stucco•
b. Cement or slate tile roof or approved equivalent (asphalt shingles are prohibited),
c. Minimum 9 -foot ceiling heights within first -floor of units, and
d. Paver accents at project entry.,
3. TRANSPORTATION
A. Up to 55 root ,. T t 9 a Approximately 50 feet on Tract A up to the
existing 7 foot wide sidewalk shall be reserved along the southern portion of this
MPUD for Collier County for an east/west public right -of -way corridor, a portion
of which currently includes a 30 foot easement for The Lord's Way. The right -of-
way shall be dedicated to Collier County in fee simple title and free of any
encumbrances upon request by Collier County based upon a demonstrated need
for the roadway. Incorporation into the Collier County Capital Improvement
Element shall constitute demonstrated need. The right -of -way shall be dedicated
at no cost to the County. The right -of -way shall be dedicated to Collier County
within 120 days of such demonstrated need. (See also Exhibit C -1 and Tract F on
the MPUD Master Plan.)
Words stizuek 4weugh are deleted, words underlined are added.
Page 7of10
Revised 8/19/15
15- CPS -01418 Packet Page -186-
10/13/2015 9. B.
B. Fort (40) feet on Tract G shall be reserved along the southern portion of this
MPUD for Collier County for an east /west public ri t -of -way corridor, a portion
of which currently includes a 30' easement for The Lord's Way. The public right -
of -way corridor shall include a 10' multiuse pathway on the north side of the
roadway to be constructed by an entity other than Collier County. The right-of-
Kay area shall be dedicated to Collier County in fee simple title and free of any
encumbrances upon request by Collier County. The right -of -way shall be
dedicated at no cost to the County. The right -of -way shall be dedicated to Collier
County within 120 days of request by Collier County.
B-. C. Signalization at the Collier Boulevard/The Lord's Way intersection shall be
provided when warranted and a fair share contribution shall be provided by the
developer of this MPUD.
Q D. The right -of -way reservation for The Lord's Way shall satisfy the developer's
mitigation requirements pursuant to Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of
the GMP so the project can be found consistent with the GMP. (See also Exhibit
C -1, The Lord's Way Typical Cross Sections for Tracts A and G.) The mitigation
will not alter the phasing requirement set forth in Exhibit F.3.D.
D-. E. Residential development shall be phased. Phase One development is limited to
147 dwelling units and 10 church- related dwelling units and will commence upon
SDP approval. «°° also Exhibit F- .".F,) Phase Two development will permit
construction of the remaining 149 units for any prospective property owner, plus
any units allowed but not constructed during Phase One. —the 149 dwell ^^
RM
• •
£- F. The existing throat length on Tract A shall remain the same after the widening of
The Lord's Way and the gatehouse shall remain in its present location.
G. A sidewalk interconnection shall be required between Tracts A and G in the
vicinity of The Lord's Way and church gatehouse. (See MPUD Master Plan.)
Fr. H. The cost of any (potential, future) turn lanes onto The Lord's Way created to serve
this development shall be borne by the developer, its successors, or assigns. This
commitment shall remain valid after such time that The Lord's Way has been
publicly dedicated.
I4: I. A 5 foot sidewalk will be constructed within the 5 foot easement dedicated to
Collier County along The Lord's Way on Tract G, the multi - family tract. The
existing 7 foot sidewalk on Tract A shall be deemed sufficient to satisfy
pedestrian access requirements on the church's property. (See also Exhibit E.7.)
L J. The developer of Tract A shall be responsible for relocating landscaping from the
existing buffer to the new buffer north of the existing sidewalk at no cost to the
Revised 8/19/15
15- CPS -01418
Words stmek thfough are deleted, words underlined are added.
Page 8 of 10
Packet Page -187-
10/13/2015 9.B.
County and with no claims for any future disruption to the landscaping in the
event of The Lord's Way widening.
8. PLANNING
The developer, its successor or assignee shall provide to any prospective resident an actual and
recorded notice with respect to the noise that is associated with the Swamp Buggy Races located
at 8250 Collier Boulevard Naples Florida, within the Florida Sports Park (within the Hacienda
Lakes MPUD) as it relates to the location of this PUD. The notice shall disclose that the Florida
Sports Park and Swamp Buggy operations regularly generate traffic and noise which may be
heard on the First Assembly Ministries property both during the day and into the evening,
including, but not limited to noise from swamp buggy tractor pulls festivals and music
concerts. This statement must be presented to the resident prior to entering into to any contract
SECTION FIVE: AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT C, THE MPUD MASTER PLAN,
OF THE MPUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE
NO. 08 -41, THE FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES
EDUCATION & REHABILITATION CAMPUS MPUD
Exhibit "C ", the MPUD Master Plan, of the MPUD Document attached to Ordinance No.
08 -41, is deleted in its entirety and is hereby replaced by the new Exhibit "C ", MPUD Master
Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein.
SECTION SIX: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super - majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By:
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legality:
day of , 2015.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
LIN
TIM NANCE, Chairman
Words swaek Offett are deleted, words underlined are added.
Page 9 of 10
Revised 8/19/15 Packet Page -188-
15- CPS -01418
Scott A. Stone
Assistant County Attorney
Attachment: Exhibit C — MPUD Master Plan
Words sti:uek thfaugh are deleted, words underlined are added.
Page 10 of 10
Revised 8/14/15 Packet Page -189-
15- CPS - 01418
10/13/2015 9.B.
v><oZ
NZE O
Z U
k
Am 1
s.. u
°m °mz
o >�_
yZN ,
ZO°z it
A_ _ _ ice`-
ONIirry
�zl
cz
I
€
S r ' 11 yY
QC�Q C
4
uc
m ' 1
ym c z
� of ,111
{, H
I m rn
wA wp N O A O I; I I I I
Q D �a m 0 11
ono 0 I I'
o ° m <
C
L I 1 i
11
Zv Z >I I I n
1 jI
a.[r.kp Rpkj C A 0 1 I C
u--'P 'go A NCO ; II
Iwo' I
» » » » »s
I I
Ii
AI°`Im� � ill II
g >om ; II
ng °� i ii' ill
I
Z- p ; II
--4 ; II
2 111 III
m
II
r 1
1
o° N
In
�m iI; II
WCp m
o n
�o Z
> 1 1
zy Z I 1 }
vl Lit mF� i 1 111 III
DD m,°.,!^ o me l i i -II
I"p'
CM mZ Dm
gIr N g$
�F�X iD m
o
K
.I
.0
�µ
1
u
fl
a>��„w�..i�t� rho;
11
I €a
4
r)
�
9
j
I�
n
RIB f "I'll (A
m
a'
(�
fir.
t�
�1
1
yjp
Ilt
r
N�yN
Q°
m
(
WFZ
PROPOSED
sNtiZO
voom
CRASS PARKNC S A >� N
F.P.L. RIGHT -OF -WAY N r pp
O+IF 2
ym
zm
c
w C
Dr;
G1 �
N
my
k°
10/13/2015 9. B.
o C.R. 951
91
n
y m
z
mS- ' p � :•
WIN ii. Mml
m�
zm
ZZ9
�z
z�
ZONING 'MPUD' >ol.lo,m.,l°A
HACIENDA LAKES,c�o�Ama
z m�m
Packet Page -190- m
rA
R
X
n
TRACT 'G' 0
TIN t=
{' i
Pnq ;
�!Yl���pf 1 •
8
T
D
O N
Z
z m
O
D
D r
C, m -<
C po Z
D .^� LA
I rn
�m
00
C
1 Z
m0)
Fri z r
s>
Zm
g� S
Z Dm
W
>M Di
2c4
4z
I1 m�mn
1 ~maD O
D m
N� Zm
e1 v °oi `n
p °Z .m
8 pD
i
f L
=N
DO
Q
mZz
o�
D
r�
D
C
MO
M
N
1
u
fl
a>��„w�..i�t� rho;
11
r)
r'
Mal V)
n
RIB f "I'll (A
m
a'
(�
r
N�yN
Q°
m
(
WFZ
T 'ACT ' B'�
PROPDSEO A55 PARKNIO
F.P.L. CHT -OF WAY "
91
n
y m
z
mS- ' p � :•
WIN ii. Mml
m�
zm
ZZ9
�z
z�
ZONING 'MPUD' >ol.lo,m.,l°A
HACIENDA LAKES,c�o�Ama
z m�m
Packet Page -190- m
rA
R
X
n
TRACT 'G' 0
TIN t=
{' i
Pnq ;
�!Yl���pf 1 •
8
T
D
O N
Z
z m
O
D
D r
C, m -<
C po Z
D .^� LA
I rn
�m
00
C
1 Z
m0)
Fri z r
s>
Zm
g� S
Z Dm
W
>M Di
2c4
4z
I1 m�mn
1 ~maD O
D m
N� Zm
e1 v °oi `n
p °Z .m
8 pD
i
f L
=N
DO
Q
mZz
o�
D
r�
D
C
MO
M
N
10/13/2015 9.B.
12 13 74��
ORDINANCE NO. 08 - 41
Vm�
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
r r o
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004 -41, AS
AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR
THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE
APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS; BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE
HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONING
DISTRICT TO A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A
69 +/- ACRE PROJECT KNOWN AS THE FIRST
ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION AND
REHABILITATION CAMPUS MPUD TO ALLOW
MULTI - FAMILY UNITS, COMMUNITY FACILITIES ...�
AND CHURCH - RELATED USES ON PROPERTY
LOCATED IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE
NUMBER 99 -59 WHICH ESTABLISHED THE -
FORMER 79.1 + /- ACRE FIRST ASSEMBLY
MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION
CAMPUS PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, Robert L. Duane, AICP, of Hole Montes, Inc., representing J. David
Mallory, President of First Assembly of God of Naples, Florida, Inc., and William L. Klohn,
President of MDG Capital Corporation, Managing Member of MDG Fountain Lakes, LLC,
petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein
described real property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
PUDA - 2007 -AR -12043 Page I of 3
REVISED 6 -17/08 KD
Packet Page -191-
10/13/2015 9.B.
SECTION ONE:
The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 14,
Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD)
Zoning District for a project known as the First Assembly Ministries Education and
Rehabilitation Campus MPUD to allow multi - family units, community facilities and church -
related uses in accordance with Exhibits A through I attached hereto and incorporated herein and
by reference made part hereof. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps; as described in
Ordinance Number 2004 -41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are
hereby amended accordingly.
SECTION TWO:
Ordinance Number 99 -59, known as the First Assembly Ministries Education &
Rehabilitation Campus PUD, adopted on September 14, 1999, by the Board of County
Commissioners is hereby repealed in its entirety.
SECTION THREE:
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by a super - majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this oZar,,(day of , 2008.
ATTEST:. ..
DWICYNT E.- BA6CK; CLERK
Byl U� ,C,
Deputy Clerk
_" s
PUDA-
REVISED 6 -17/08 KD
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By. .�
TOM HENNING, CHAIRMA
Page 2 of 3
Packet Page -192-
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency
Marjorid . Student - Stirling
Assistant County Attorney
PUDA- 2007- AR- 12043/KD /sp
Exhibit A:
Permitted Uses
Exhibit B:
Development Standards /Typical Building Layout
Exhibit C:
Master Plan/Typical Cross Sections
Exhibit D:
Legal Description
Exhibit E:
List of Request Deviations from LDC
Exhibit F:
List of Developer Commitments
Exhibit G:
On -site & Off -site premises signage
Project History:
Ordinance Number 93 -57 (repealed)
Ordinance Number 96 -58 (repealed)
Ordinance Number 96 -86 (repealed)
Ordinance Number 99 -59
PUDA - 2007 -AR -12043
REVISED 6 -17108 KD
Page 3 of 3
Packet Page -193-
10/13/2015 9.B.
This ordinance file with the
of oesOf' e c
Ivord=Y of .
and ocknowledgeme that
fill recei thi �oY
of al
BY vevuer c
10/13/2015 9.B.
EXHIBIT A
FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CAMPUS MPUD
CHURCH RELATED USES AND DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY
I. CHURCH RELATED PERMITTED USES (TRACTS A -E)
The First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus MPUD will include a mixture of land
uses for religious, community social services, and residential uses in a campus -type setting. This wide
mixture of land uses is also intended to provide some services on -site, which will provide convenience for
the many non - mobile residents and minimize traffic generation from the campus. The key facilities at
build -out will include a maximum of: an auditorium for predominantly church use with 2200 seats, a chapel
with 200 seats, and a private school for 300 students in elementary and secondary schools or Bible College,
a care unit facility with 249 care beds and a facility for 300 day care units. The care beds will be located in
the educational complex on Tract A (183), 66 beds in the Rehabilitation Center on Tract A and 20 beds will
be located in the multi - family /multi- purpose facility on Tract A until such time as the rehabilitation center
on Tract A is completed.
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part,
for other than the following:
A. PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES AND SIC CODES: (TRACTS A -E)
Land Use Type Tract
1. Religious organizations (Group 8661, limited to churches and religious organizations). A
2. Private elementary and secondary schools (Group 8211, limited to vocational high school and
colleges, universities and professional schools) (Group 8221, limited to theological seminaries). A
3. Residential care units (Group 8361 — maximum of 249 beds, limited to:
a) Alcoholism rehabilitation centers, residential, with health care incidental;
b) Drug rehabilitation centers, residential, with health care incidental;
c) Homes for children, with health care incidental; and
d) Homes for destitute men and women). A
4. Child daycare services (Group 8351, limited to child care centers). A
5. Rehabilitative service center specialty outpatient facilities, not classified elsewhere (Group 8093,
limited to outpatient detoxification centers *). A
a) Job training (Group 8331, limited to job training). A, C
b) Individual and family social services (Group 8322, limited to:
1) adult day care centers;
2) counseling centers; and
3) hotlines). A
c) Specialty hospitals, except psychiatric (Group 8069, limited to:
1) Alcoholism rehabilitation hospital; and
2) drug addiction rehabilitation hospital). A
d) Social services — not classified elsewhere (Group 8399, limited to social service information
exchange, e.g. alcoholism, drug addiction).
First Assemblies, AR 12043 revised 7/28/08
A -1
Packet Page -194-
/7
10/13/2015 9.B.
n 6. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses,
as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by the process outlined in the Land Development
Code (LDC).
*Principally for on -site residents only, however, an incidental component of the program is to allow past
program residents or social service agency referrals to attend programs comprising no more than 10% of
program participants.
B. ACCESSORY USES AND SIC CODES (TRACTS A-D)
Accessory uses are uses that are only accessory to permitted religious or institutional uses, temporary or
periodic in nature. Accessory uses shall be of a lesser area than the size of the principal uses in which they are
located. Accessory uses are principally for on -site residents only, however, an incidental component of the
program is to allow past program residents or social service agency referrals to attend programs comprising no
more than 10% of program participants. Accessory uses shall principally generate their activity from the
principal permitted uses for the subject property, including their traffic's trip generation so as to minimize
external impacts to adjacent properties and the external roadway network.
Land Use Tyne
Tract
1. Coin - operated laundries (Group 7215, limited to coin - operated laundries). A, C
2. Radio broadcasting stations and tower (church use) (Group 4832, limited to one only). A, C
3. Television broadcasting station and tower (church use) (Group 4833, limited to one only). A, C
4. Bookstores for church and school only (Group 5942, limited to a maximum of two). A
5.
Cemetery, including mausoleum, accessory to the church use only.
A
6.
Christian memorial per MPUD Master Plan.
A
7.
Guard house /campus security office.
A
8.
Cafeterias that are not soup kitchens (shall be an integral part of a principal use for on -site residents
and visitors utilizing permitted principal uses on the campus only).
A
9.
Help supply services for residents only (Group 7363, limited to labor pool only and limited
to residents only).
A
10.
Overnight parking for visitors in recreational vehicles or busses (see Exhibit B, Table N.C.).
C
11.
Recreational facilities, including but not limited to: gymnasiums, football fields, baseball fields,
soccer fields, basketball courts, swimming pools, tennis courts, shuffle board courts, waterways
A.B.
for canoeing, gazebo, boat/fishing docks and boardwalks.
C.D
12.
Grassed parking area for overflow parking within FPL right -of -way.
B
13.
Administrative services for principal uses including offices, meeting and conference rooms for
the church and rehabilitative center.
A
14. Ten multi- family units for church employees in the multi- family /multi - purpose building. A
A -2
First Assemblies, Alt 12043 revised 7/28108
Packet Page -195-
10/13/2015 9. B.
15. Motor vehicle dealers (Group 5211, with sales limited to used vehicles that have been repaired in
conjunction with the Rehabilitation Center use on site, and further limited as shown in Table iV.D). C
16. Recreational vehicle dealers (Group 5561, with sales limited to used recreational vehicles that
have been repaired in conjunction with the Rehabilitation Center use on site, and further limited
as shown in Table IV.D.). C
17. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses,
as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by the process outlined in the LDC.
C. PRESERVE SUBDISTRICT USES AND STRUCTURES (TRACT E)
No building or structure or part thereof shall be erected, altered or used, or lands used in whole or part other
than the following:
A. Permitted Uses and Structures:
I. Passive recreation areas.
2. Water management facilities in wetlands and water management structures.
3. Mitigation areas.
4. Boardwalks and trails.
5. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of
permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by
the process outlined in the LDC.
A -3
First Assemblies, AR 12043 revised 7/28/08
Packet Page -196-
10/13/2015 9.B.
II. RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES (TRACT G)
No building, structure or part thereof located on Tract G, shall be erected, altered or used, or land
used, in whole or part, for other than shown below:
A. PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES:
1. Multiple - family and two family dwellings.
2. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of
permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by
the process outlined in the LDC.
B. ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES:
1. Recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of a residential development,
including but not limited to a walk path, docks, community center building and
office, pool and playgrounds.
2. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the residential permitted
uses within this MPUD Ordinance including swimming pools, boat docks
recreational building and a tot lot for children.
3. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of
permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by
the process outlined in the LDC.
C. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY:
A maximum of 296 multi - family units are allowed on Tract G that may include three two -
family multi - family dwelling units.
III. RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT (TRACT F)
Use of this tract is limited to rights -of -way.
IV. PROHIBITED USES
Soup kitchens shall be a prohibited principal and accessory use throughout this entire MPUD Zoning
District.
A -4
First Assemblies, AR 12043 revised 7128/08
Packet Page -197-
10/13/2015 9. B.
EXHIBIT B
FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION
CAMPUS
MPUD
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
LISTING OF TABLES
TABLE I - RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY INCLUDING TWO - FAMILY
DWELLING UNITS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES, FOR TRACT G
TABLE II - RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
ACCESSORY STUCTURES, FOR TRACT G
TABLE III - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR CHURCH RELATED
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES, FOR TRACTS A, B, C
TABLE IV - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR CHURCH RELATED
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, FOR TRACTS A, B, C
B- 1
First Assemblies, AR 12043 revised 6/10 /08
Packet Page -198-
2
3
4 10-11,
5
10/13/2015 9.B.
TABLE 1
RESIDENTIAL MULTI - FAMILY INCLUDING TWO- FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
For Tract G
n.
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
MULTI- FAMILY INCLUDING TWO FAMILY
DWELLING UNITS*
MINIMUM FRONT YARD
25 FEET
MINIMUM SIDE YARD
NONE, AS LONG AS MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES
IS MET
MINIMUM REAR YARD
25 FEET
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA
850 SQUARE FEET PER DWELLING UNIT
MINIMUM SETBACK FROM NORTHERN,
SOUTHERN AND EASTERN MPUD BOUNDARY
35 FEET PLUS ONE FOOT FOR EACH FOOT OF BUILDING HEIGHT
OVER 35 FEET
MINIMUM YARD FROM INTERNAL PAVED
VEHICULAR USE AREAS
10 FEET UNLESS ATTACHED TO CARPORTS, GARAGES OR
PORTICOS*
MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES
GREATER THAN 20 FEET
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
MULTI - FAMILY STRUCTURES -- FOUR STORIES NOT TO EXCEED
52 FEET AS ZONED AND NOT TO EXCEED 56 FEET ACTUAL
TWO - FAMILY STRUCTURES — TWO STORIES NOT TO EXCEED 25
FEET AS ZONED AND NOT TO EXCEED 35 FEET ACTUAL
MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM LAKES
20 FEET -
" This standard does not apply to travel ways that include public rights -of -way but may include parking areas and driveways. See Exhibit B1
typical sketch for distance of principal uses, carports, garages or porticos from travel ways.
B. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY
A maximum of 296 multi - family units are allowed on Tract G that may include three two- family dwelling units in separate
structures.
C. ROOF TREATMENTS
All the roofs for multi - family units including two - family dwelling unit structures shall be constructed of tile.
D. TWO - FAMILY DWELLING UNITS
The two- family dwelling units shall be subject to the standards of the LDC for Cluster Residential Design and approved as a Site
Development Plan along with other multi- family structures.
GENERAL. Except as provided for herein, all criteria shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or
between structures. Condominium, residential cooperative and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining
development standards.
B -2
First Assemblies, AR 12043 revised 6/10/08
Packet Page -199-
10/13/2015 9. B.
TABLE II
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STUCTURES
For Tract G
A.
* See Exhibit B l depicting location of carport areas adjacent to vehicular use area/travel ways.
B- 3
First Assemblies, AR 12043 revised 6/10/08
Packet Page -200-
en. s
MINIMUM FRONT YARD
20 FEET
MINIMUM SIDE YARD
NONE AS LONG AS MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN PRINCIPAL
STRUCTURES IS MET
MINIMUM REAR YARD
20 FEET
DISTANCE FROM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE
20 FEET OR 10 FEET FOR CARPORTS
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
TWO STORIES NOT TO EXCEED 25 FEET AS ZONED AND NOT TO
EXCEED 35 FEET ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHTS
MINIMUM SETBACK FROM MPUD BOUNDARY
25 FEET
MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM INTERNAL PAVED
VEHICULAR USE AREAS"
10 FEET UNLESS ATTACHED TO CARPORTS OR GARAGES*
MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM LAKES
20 FEET
* See Exhibit B l depicting location of carport areas adjacent to vehicular use area/travel ways.
B- 3
First Assemblies, AR 12043 revised 6/10/08
Packet Page -200-
10/13/2015 9.B.
TABLE III
DEVELOPMENT S T ANDARBS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
For Tracts A, B, C
PlaNMAL STRUCTURES"
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA FOR CARE
275 SQUARE FEET
UNITS
MINIMUM FLOOR AREA FOR MULTI-
700 SQUARE FEET
FAMILY UNITS
MINIMUM SETBACK FROM
35 FEET PLUS ONE FOOT OF SETBACK FOR EACH FOOT OF ZONED BUILDING
NORTHERN, SOUTHERN AND EASTERN
HEIGHT OVER 35 FEET
MPUD BOUNDARY
100 FEET ALONG CR 951, 35 FEET ALONG THE LORD'S WAY AND 25 FEET
MINIMUM FRONT YARD
ELSEWHERE
MINIMUM SIDE YARD
NONE AS LONG AS DISTANCES BETWEEN STRUCTURES ARE MET
MINIMUM YARD FROM INTERNAL
10 FEET
PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREAS
MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
GREATER THAN 20 FEET
STRUCTURES
FIVE STORIES NOT TO EXCEED 67 FEET AS ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT AND
NOT TO EXCEED 74 FEET ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT FOR CHURCH,
EDUCATION FACILITY AND CARE UNITS, ALL OTHERS - THREE STORIES IN
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 40 FEET ZONED HEIGHT AND NOT TO EXCEED 45
FEET ACTUAL HEIGHT. THE HEIGHT TO THE TOP OF THE STEEPLE OF THE
WORSHIP CENTER SHALL NOT EXCEED 104 FEET.
SHALL BE SEPARATED A MINIMUM OF ITS FALL ZONE RADIUS (BASED ON
SETBACK RADIO TOWER
THE HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE) OF 170 FEET FROM ANY
HABITABLE STRUCTURE
PRESERVE AREA
25 FEET
3 FEET FROM TRACT BOUNDARY; AND
SPECIAL MINIMUM SETBACK
NO STRUCTURE IN THAT PORTION OF TRACT A LOCATED EAST OF THE FPL
FOR THE MULTI - FAMILY /MULTI-
EASEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 60 FEET OF ANY RESIDENTIAL
PURPOSE BLDG. ON TRACT A EAST OF
STRUCTURE (SEE ALSO EXHIBIT B -1 DEPICTING THE MULTI-FAMILY/MULTI-
FFL EASEMENT
PURPOSE BUILDING SETBACK)
[LAKE SETBACK
20 FEET
First Assemblies, AR 12043 revised 6/10/08
Packet Page -201-
TABLE IV
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STUCTURES
CHURCH RELATED USES FOR TRACTS A, B, C
A.
10/13/2015 9.B.
*Fishing docks shall not intrude into the landscape buffer.
"The monument honoring the National Christian Armed Forces will have a maximum height of thirty -five (35) feet and it shall be located
no closer than 50 feet from the western edge of this MPUD on the Master Plan.
B. SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS
Accessory uses shall have no signage visible from The Lord's Way or CR 951 and signage shall only be permitted at entries to
their respective buildings with on- premise directional signs. No advertising shall be permitted for accessory uses other than with
materials directly associated with principal uses, such as church bulletins, flyers and circulars available to residents, employees,
members, program participants and patrons of the principal uses (see also Exhibit A pertaining to accessory uses).
C. PARKING OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES (RVs)
Parking for RV vehicles is limited to Tracts A and C only and there shall be no more than three consecutive night stays permitted
for each vehicle. A maximum of 25 RVs may be parked at any one time. This parking area shall be only for self- contained
vehicles that include sanitary facilities. The developer shall provide a dump station on- site for use of residents only that is
sufficient to serve the maximum number of RVs that may be parked at one time.
D. SALE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES (RVs) AND USED CARS
Combined sales of RVs and used cars shall be limited to a maximum of 10 sales per year. A maximum of 3 vehicles may be
stored or held for sale at any one time on Tract C at the repair site. No vehicles shall be stored on any other Tract. All storage,
repairs and sales must be conducted inside a fully enclosed structure limited to Tract C only. Compliance with this
provision shall be submitted as part of the annual PUD Monitoring Report. 10"11,
B- 5
First Assemblies, AR 12043 revised 6/10/06
Packet Page -202-
25 FEET ALONG THE LORD'S WAY; 50 FEET ALONG CR 95I EXCEPT FOR
MINIMUM FRONT YARD
FISHING DOCKS
MINIMUM SIDE YARD
SAME AS PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
MINIMUM REAR YARD
20 FEET
DISTANCE FROM PRINCIPAL
20 FEET
STRUCTURE
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
TWO STORIES NOT TO EXCEED 30 FEET ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT AND NOT
TO EXCEED 35 FEET ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT **
PRESERVE AREA
10 FEET
MINIMUM SETBACK FROM MPUD
25 FEET OR FRONT YARD SETBACK, WHICHEVER IS GREATER
BOUNDARY
MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM LAKES
20 FEET
*Fishing docks shall not intrude into the landscape buffer.
"The monument honoring the National Christian Armed Forces will have a maximum height of thirty -five (35) feet and it shall be located
no closer than 50 feet from the western edge of this MPUD on the Master Plan.
B. SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS
Accessory uses shall have no signage visible from The Lord's Way or CR 951 and signage shall only be permitted at entries to
their respective buildings with on- premise directional signs. No advertising shall be permitted for accessory uses other than with
materials directly associated with principal uses, such as church bulletins, flyers and circulars available to residents, employees,
members, program participants and patrons of the principal uses (see also Exhibit A pertaining to accessory uses).
C. PARKING OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES (RVs)
Parking for RV vehicles is limited to Tracts A and C only and there shall be no more than three consecutive night stays permitted
for each vehicle. A maximum of 25 RVs may be parked at any one time. This parking area shall be only for self- contained
vehicles that include sanitary facilities. The developer shall provide a dump station on- site for use of residents only that is
sufficient to serve the maximum number of RVs that may be parked at one time.
D. SALE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES (RVs) AND USED CARS
Combined sales of RVs and used cars shall be limited to a maximum of 10 sales per year. A maximum of 3 vehicles may be
stored or held for sale at any one time on Tract C at the repair site. No vehicles shall be stored on any other Tract. All storage,
repairs and sales must be conducted inside a fully enclosed structure limited to Tract C only. Compliance with this
provision shall be submitted as part of the annual PUD Monitoring Report. 10"11,
B- 5
First Assemblies, AR 12043 revised 6/10/06
Packet Page -202-
t
i
a
Ij!
1r
�r
M
10/13/2015 9.B.
I I
m 9
<Z)
x LO
x LO
��a
�0 °
U
I�
w
a
z
0
Z
Cn
w
Ix
M
N
J
0
J C9
w
Z
m
WHO
�LL
CL
1.01i ZO
ul LL
C, � N �
.� �Ztp
LL
0.
a
I
�V
7
a
Z
REVISED MAY 20, 2008
Packet Page -203-
I
a
i
t
II
a
J
I!
fl
!!
II
w
U
I�
w
a
z
0
Z
Cn
w
Ix
M
N
J
0
J C9
w
Z
m
WHO
�LL
CL
1.01i ZO
ul LL
C, � N �
.� �Ztp
LL
0.
a
I
�V
7
a
Z
REVISED MAY 20, 2008
Packet Page -203-
I
a
D
OL
<
U
z
0
F-
<
-j Z
Co <
<
v I
LLJ
LLJ
�4WM �-IHO - dA
M'd ISVI IMOdO"
LLJ
Lu 1:1
!;Z ,
k
IQ
U11
LU
V)
LI) P
U-
R.
LL
10/13/2015 9.B.
9
L
Z
AVM -A -LMW -I di
ON"o sww 0350doad
jX
uj
Ln Ce
<
<
JL Cie
0 LL
I ii
-j
2W
it
1
L56 IM
--------------------- ------ -----------
-------------
- -------------- ----------------------------------
-
gig
......... .
LL
PEI 1"A
oil
wig
9
L
Z
AVM -A -LMW -I di
ON"o sww 0350doad
jX
uj
Ln Ce
<
<
JL Cie
0 LL
I ii
-j
2W
it
1
L56 IM
--------------------- ------ -----------
-------------
- -------------- ----------------------------------
-
gig
......... .
Packet Page -204-
/0'�
10/13/2015 9.B.
PUDA- 2007 -AR -1 2043
First Assemblies PUD
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (AS FURNISHED BY CLIENT)
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 114, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET
THEREOF; AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST
1/4 AND THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHWEST 1/4. SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, ALL
SITUATED AND LYING IN COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA.
NOTES:
THIS PROPERTY SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESMICTTONS OF
RECORD.
BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON REFER TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 14. TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY. FLORIDA AS BEING S.00- 49'12 "W. (STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM,
FLORIDA EAST ZONE, 83/90)
ABOVE GROUND IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING ON THIS PROPERTY HAVE BEEN
LOCATED HEREON AS SHOWN. ABOVE GROUND INDICATORS OF UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES EXISTING ON THIS PROPERTY HAVE BEEN LOCATED HEREON AS
SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED ON THIS SURVEY.
ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING ON OR ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY
HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED OR SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY.
ABSTRACT OF TITLE HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY SURVEYOR.
THIS SURVEY IS NOT VAUD WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED
SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER.
PROPERTY AREA: 68.78 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
CERTIFIED TO. FLORIDA COMMUNITY BANK
FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD OF NAPLES. FLORIDA, INC., A
FLORIDA CORPORATION
TIB BANK OF THE KEYS
FIRST TITLE AND ABSTRACT. INC.
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
�-. Legal Description
Exhibit D
Packet Page -205-
10/13/2015 9.B.
EXHIBIT E
FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION & REHABILITATION CAMPUS
MPUD REZONE
LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS
FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC)
1. Deviation No. 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 CA, which requires a 20
foot wide Type D buffer along The Lord's Way, to allow this buffer to be reduced from
20 feet to 10 feet in width along Tract G, the Multi - Family Tract. This deviation will
also allow the existing 10 foot wide buffer to remain on Tract A adjacent to The Lord's
Way prior to the widening of The Lord's Way and to allow this Type D buffer to remain
10 feet in width after the widening of The Lord's Way and to be relocated to the north of
the existing sidewalk. The plantings in the 10 foot Type D buffer area on Tract A shall
be located just to the north of the sidewalk. (See Exhibit I, The Lord's Way Typical
Cross Sections for Tract A and G.)
2. Deviation No. 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04 C.16.b.i, to allow a off -
site premises sign in the southwest corner of the subject property on Tract A. The
deviation is to exceed the maximum area of 12 square feet to allow the off -site premise ?0—N
sign to be a maximum size of 32 square feet as an addition to the existing sign. (See
MPUD Master Plan and Exhibit G depicting proposed sign detail.)
3.A. Deviation No. 3A seeks relief from LDC Section 05.06.04 C.l.c, that allows a
maximum sign area of 80 square feet, the deviation is to allow a maximum size of 132
square feet in area. The sign is currently 100 feet in area. (See Exhibit G for sign detail
and also Deviation no. 2.)
3.B. Deviation No. 3B seeks relief from LDC Section 05.06.04 C.16.b.ii., that limits
the height of the sign to 8 feet above the lowest center grade of the arterial roadway and
to allow the existing sign to remain 20 feet in height.
3.C. Deviation 3C seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04 C.La, that limits the size of
signs to 15 feet to allow the existing 20 foot tail sign to remain.
4.A. Deviation No. 4A seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04 C.16.b.v, which requires
an off -site premise sign be located within 1,000 feet of the intersection of the roadway to
allow the sign to be 1,400 feet from the property it serves on Tract G.
4.B. Deviation No. 4B seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02 A.1, Sidewalk and Bike
Lane Requirements to allow relief from the requirement that a 6 foot wide sidewalk and
bike lane be provided along The Lord's Way (a requirement for The Lord's Way upon
becoming an arterial roadway in the future). The deviation is to allow the northerly most n
GXurrentMESELEMIPUD RezonesTirst Assembly of God Naples, PUDA - 2007- AR- 1 2043\PUD does for SCMEXHIBIT
E List of Deviations 5- 9- 08.doc Page 1
Packet Page -206-
10/13/2015 93.
existing 7 foot wide sidewalk to remain west of the existing entrance into First Assembly
Ministries on Tract A to satisfy the pedestrian access requirements of LDC Section
6.06.02 A. 1. This deviation will also allow a 5 foot wide sidewalk to be constructed
within a five foot easement area on Tract G, the multi - family tract, to satisfy this LDC
requirement. (See also Exhibit 1, The Lords Way Typical Cross Sections.)
4.C. Deviation No. 4C seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02 A.1, Sidewalk and Bike
Lane Requirements that requires sidewalks on both sides of the street and to allow a
sidewalk on only one side of the internal access drives for the multi - family Tract G as
buildings are proposed only on one side of the access drive. Furthermore, the project
includes a proposal for an extensive internal pedestrian circulation system for access
throughout the MPUD. (See MPUD Master Plan.)
4.D, Deviation No. 4D seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02 A.1, which requires a 6
foot wide sidewalk and bike lane along C.R. 951, an arterial roadway, to allow an
existing 7 foot wide sidewalk along a portion of the C.R. 951 road frontage on property
belonging to First Assembly Ministries to satisfy this requirement or by providing money
in lieu of providing a sidewalk. A connection will be provided from the sidewalk on The
Lord's Way to the sidewalk which the County will construct on CR 951 east of the canal
at the intersection of The Lord's Way and CR 951.
5. Deviation No. 5 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01 B, Street System
Requirements, which requires that layout of all developments to be coordinated with
surrounding properties to provide interconnections. The deviation is to allow private
access to both the church campus and multi - family development to be private entrances
and to not require interconnection between the two uses. A provision has been made for
a potential future access to the east.
6. Deviation No. 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1, Group Housing
which requires a maximum floor area that shall not exceed 0.45 for care units. The
deviation is to allow the care units to be developed within the 368,000 square feet of floor
area for all uses.
6.A. Deviation No. 6A seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.3.b. that requires 0.75
parking space per assisted living unit, to allow .75 parking space per 10 care units.
7. Deviation No. 7 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.06.02 DA and 5.03.02 E.3,
pertaining to minimum landscape buffer width and minimum wall setback, respectively.
The LDC requires that a 15 foot wide Type B landscape buffer and a 10 foot wide Type
A landscape buffer to be provided along the property boundary between Tract G, the
multi- family tract, and Tracts A and C of First Assembly Ministries' campus, with the 15
foot Type B buffer to be provided for the more intensive use (i.e., on Tracts A and C) and
the 10 foot Type A buffer to be provided for the less intensive use (i.e., on Tract G). The
i-� LDC also requires that the non - residential use provide a minimum 6 foot high concrete
(precast or masonry) wall a minimum of 6 feet from the residential zoning district
G:1Current\DESELEM\PUD Rezones\First Assembly of God Naples, PUDA- 2007- AR- 1 2043\PUD docs for BCC\EXMIBIT
E List of Deviations 5- 9- 08.doc Page 2
Packet Page -207-
10/13/2015 93.
boundary (i.e., at least 6 feet inside Tracts A and Q. The LDC allows for reductions in
required buffer widths to a minimum width of 10 feet provided that compensating
increases in width are made elsewhere in the buffer. The deviation is to locate the buffers
within platted easements as depicted on Exhibit C, the MPUD Master Plan, departing in
places from the property line and with portions of either buffer encroaching onto an
adjacent tract(s). Areas depicted in the legend represent reductions in buffer width and
include compensating increases in buffer width. Portions of the 10 foot Type A buffer on
Tract G — Phase 2 (i.e., adjacent to Celebration Boulevard, the existing entry road into
Tract A) are shown with a reduction in width to less than 10 feet, severed in some places,
due to the encroachment of proposed impervious improvements. The required wall shall
be located a minimum of 6 feet from the residential side of the 15 foot Type B buffer.
8. Deviation No. 8 seeks relief to LDC Section 4.06.02 C, Table 2.4, which requires
buffering internal to uses within Tracts A and C. The deviation is to allow no buffering
between uses internal to Tracts A and C. See also Deviation no. 7 that provides buffering
between Tracts A and C.
9. Deviation No. 9 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04 G., Table 17, Parking
Spaces Required which requires 3 parking spaces for each 7 seats in the chapel or
assembly area, to allow a reduction of this standard to a minimum of 1 space for each 4
seats that is typically only for the expansion allowed due to congregational growth so as
to allow this standard to apply only to previously approved church - related structures in n
existence prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Any future church - related parking area
will require the standard of 3 parking spaces for 7 seats.
G:\Current\DESELEMIPUD Rezones\First Assembly of God Naples, PUDA- 2007- AR- 120431PUD flocs for BCCtEXHIBIT
E List of Deviations 5- 9- 08.doc Page 3
Packet Page -208-
10/13/2015 9.B.
EXHIBIT F
FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CAMPUS
MPUD REZONE
LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS
L GENERAL
Development of the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus
MPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections
and parts of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of
issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to final subdivision plat, final
site development plan (SDP), excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to
which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental
standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply.
2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING GMP COMMITMENTS
A. A minimum of 147 of the 296 affordable- workforce and market rate housing units, as
they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential
^ services personnel (ESP) as defined in the LDC, as further defined in the County's
Local Housing Assistance Plan. The period of time that the dwelling units will be
reserved for persons providing essential services will be a minimum of 60 days from
the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the initial offering and 60 days
from the date a unit is offered thereafter. The developer shall comply with the
following affordable housing commitments upon approval of the SDP for Tract G, the
multi- family tract.
B. The developer of Tract G, the multi - family tract, shall comply with one or more of
the following:
i. The Affordable- Workforce Housing Density Bonus provisions in the
LDC, in effect as of February 19, 2008, the date of adoption of the GMP
provisions affecting the subject property; or,
Ii. State law applicable to the designation as a Community Workforce
Housing Innovation Program (CWHIP) Project by the State of Florida. I.) the
developer shall provide a minimum of 80 ESP dwelling units comprised of a
minimum of 10 dwelling units for those earning less than 80% of the median
income for Collier County, and 2.) a minimum of 70 dwelling units for those
earning between 80% and 140% of the median income for Collier County; or,
iii. The developer shall enter into an agreement with Collier County assuring
that no fewer than 147 affordable - workforce and market rate housing units are
F- 1
First Assemblies, AR- ( 2043 revised 7/28/08
Packet Page -209-
10/13/2015 9. B.
constructed and, as they become available, will be offered first to ESP, persons
involved in providing essential services in Collier County. Such agreement shall
be in effect for not less than 15 years. Such an agreement shall provide that a
minimum of 35 dwelling units shall be provided for those earning no more than
150% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of 25 dwelling
units shall be provided for those earning no more than 80% of the median income
of Collier County.
C. No more than 57 market rate dwelling units shall be constructed prior to the
construction of all affordable- workforce housing (AWH) dwelling units and the
following phasing schedule shall apply, however, more AWH units may be included
in any one phase. Development of the project will be phased, as follows:
Phase 1A 60 AWH units + 57 market rate units = 117 ESP units
Phase 1B 30 market rate ESP units
Phase 2 149 housing units
D. The maximum primary occupancy per dwelling unit in the 296 non- church - related
dwelling units for two and three bedroom units (one bedroom units are not permitted)
shall be as follows:
1. Two bedroom units -five occupants.
2. Three bedroom units -seven occupants.
E. All but 4 mobile home units currently located on Tract A east of the FPL right -of -way
shall be removed from the subject property prior to the construction of any housing
not reserved for church - related employees, staff and program participants. The 4
remaining mobile home units may serve as adult care units for program participants,
and shall be removed as they are replaced by permanent multi- family residential
structures, 20 temporary adult care units and related accessory uses, or within 24
months from the date the GMP Amendment is adopted (February 19, 2008),
whichever is sooner.
3. TRANSPORTATION
A. Up to 55 feet on Tract G and approximately 50 feet on Tract A up to the existing 7
foot wide sidewalk shall be reserved along the southern portion of this MPUD for
Collier County for an east /west public right -of -way corridor, a portion of which
currently includes a 30 foot easement for The Lord's Way. The right -of -way Shall be
dedicated to Collier County in fee simple title and free of any encumbrances upon
request by Collier County based upon a demonstrated need for the roadway.
Incorporation into the Collier County Capital Improvement Element shall constitute
demonstrated need. The right -of -way shall be dedicated at no cost to the County.
The right -of -way shall be dedicated to Collier County within 120 days of such
demonstrated need. (See also Exhibit C -1 and Tract F on the MPUD Master Plan.)
First Assemblies, AR -12043 revised 7128/08
F- 2
Packet Page -210-
n
n
10/13/2015 9.B.
B. Signalization at the Collier Boulevard/The Lord's Way intersection shall be provided
when warranted and a fair share contribution shall be provided by the developer of
this MPUD.
C. The right -of -way reservation for The Lord's Way shall satisfy the developer's
mitigation requirements pursuant to Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the
GMP so the project can be found consistent with the GMP. (See also Exhibit C -1,
The Lord's Way Typical Cross Sections for Tracts A and G.) The mitigation will not
alter the phasing requirement set forth in Exhibit F.3.D.
D. Residential development shall be phased. Phase One development is limited to 147
dwelling units and 10 church- related dwelling units and will commence upon SDP
approval. (See also Exhibit RIF.) Phase Two development will permit construction
of the remaining 149 units for any prospective property owner, plus any units allowed
but not constructed during Phase One. For the 149 dwelling units in Phase Two, no
certificate of occupancy shall be issued until improvements to the deficient segment
of Davis Boulevard are complete from CR 951 to Radio Road.
E. The existing throat length on Tract A shall remain the same after the widening of The
Lord's Way and the gatehouse shall remain in its present location.
F. A sidewalk interconnection shall be required between Tracts A and G in the vicinity
of The Lord's Way and church gatehouse. (See MPUD Master Plan.)
G. The cost of any (potential, future) turn lanes onto The Lord's Way created to serve
this development shall be borne by the developer, its successors, or assigns. This
commitment shall remain valid after such time that The Lord's Way has been
publicly dedicated.
H. A 5 foot sidewalk will be constructed within the 5 foot easement dedicated to Collier
County along The Lord's Way on Tract G, the multi - family tract. The existing 7 foot
sidewalk on Tract A shall be deemed sufficient to satisfy pedestrian access
requirements on the church's property. (See also Exhibit E, 7.)
I. The developer of Tract A shall be responsible for relocating landscaping from the
existing buffer to the new buffer north of the existing sidewalk at no cost to the
County and with no claims for any future disruption to the landscaping in the event of
The Lord's Way widening.
First Assemblies, AR -12043 revised 7/28/08
F- 3
Packet Page -211-
10/13/2015 9.B.
4. LANDSCAPE/BUFFERING /WALL REQUIREMENTS
A. The plantings within the Type D buffer area on Tract G shall consist of trees on 15
foot centers. This provision is designed to implement GMP provisions pertaining to
enhanced landscaping in the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict.
B. When the existing 10 foot buffer is relocated on Tract A, it shall consist of trees on 15
foot centers. This provision is designed to implement GMP provisions pertaining to
enhanced landscaping in the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict.
C. A continuously running 6 -foot high concrete wall shall be provided by the developers
of each respective portion of the site along the entire western boundary of Tract G.
Said wall must be in place prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in
Tract G.
5. RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
A tot lot shall be provided on Tract G for children 2 to 12 years of age, which meets
ASTM standards. The tot lot shall be constructed prior to the issuance of the first
certificate of occupancy for the first multi- family building.
6. USE LIMITATIONS n
The rehabilitation facility and associated uses shall not provide housing, food service or
any other services to sexual predators or pedophiles.
7. SECURITY
The developer shall provide twenty -four (24) hour security services for the rehabilitation
facility and associated uses at all times.
F- 4
First Assemblies, AR -12043 revised 7/28/08
Packet Page -212-
Irl
O
C?
Q
C14
10/13/2015 9.B.
141-011
24"
---- - --- -----
rN
.1
MINISTRIES -
o...... . ... .
in
i II
NAls-'
-.4 0. _
I —EMSING
ON-97E
ILLUMINMED
DOLUZ—SID
PYLON SIGN
61—ow
ON-SITE & OFF-SITE
CHECKED BY:
R D.
PROJECT"
2005.054
Napl a, FL 34110
T
Off-Site
.
Phone: (239) 254-2000
RM
PREMISE SIG14AGE
Premise Sign
CAD PLE NAME:
Florida Certificate of
DamflAw-SKM Authorization No.1772
EXHIBIT G
JON
v
950 Encore Way
ON-SITE & OFF-SITE
CHECKED BY:
R D.
PROJECT"
2005.054
Napl a, FL 34110
T
.
Phone: (239) 254-2000
RM
PREMISE SIG14AGE
DRAM BY :
CAD PLE NAME:
Florida Certificate of
DamflAw-SKM Authorization No.1772
EXHIBIT G
JON
SON EXH
DATE ;
VHW - ITEM
10
G
Packet Page -213-
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF COLLIER)
I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the
Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct
copy of:
ORDINANCE 2008 -41
10/13/2015 9.B.
Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
on the 22nd day of July, 2008, during Regular Session.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of
County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 29th
day of July, 2008.
DWIGHT E. BROCK.
Clerk of Courts; .ai1'd..GI &rk
Ex -of f icio to Bo'ard,, of
County Commissioers
By: Ann Jenn oh ,
Deputy Clerk
Packet Page -214-
t")
3 os m ION
10/1
o
P
<r
�a
4
Z
O
wF
t— Q
Vi U
z
00
O
J
a
J
R
a
s
�
�
d �
6
�
�b
o
AMqV
M
�R
Poll
�
vu�mC
p5
�y°�
1�Yg
g��55
[g�
a
jig L56'>J']
OMYA31flOS tl31Ti00
8
,YNY�
(use wo)
oavnTInos asmoo
Cl
tFy
Mgg
hGG
IL
do
erg° <$
U
_°
.
-
5
3 os m ION
/2015 9.B.
Q
G
V
Z
Z
O
N
L.L
Z
O
Q
U
O
J
N
O
N
J
a
a
Z
0
H
W
a
4
z
00
a
J
6
�
o
AMqV
M
�R
Poll
�
vu�mC
p5
�y°�
1�Yg
g��55
[g�
a
jig L56'>J']
OMYA31flOS tl31Ti00
do
erg° <$
_°
.
-
5
a
y�
�u�
rm
z
3w b
���
NDLLY1NYtd
�=
J�
YWBNPNBviYVS
tl tlsvl s
J6ANV M
Y1NVS
P
Packet Page
-215- dm g
5
/2015 9.B.
Q
G
V
Z
Z
O
N
L.L
Z
O
Q
U
O
J
N
O
N
J
a
a
Z
0
H
W
a
m
Q n_ 2 I
W p I
LL
L�U/ z a a li
LL. Q op I I
2 W
5N
f6 W
O S< i
Q G j(
U p f
D I `.
W G
C
I
�U I
Q
Q' I
LLI
Z m
J
� I
X
IJ 'o I
W Q
5
L 0
IJ z
N
I
Q
L
LL
}a'
p
10/13/2015 9.B.'
Oj OOQsc
22
UJ
—11 iiI pN�
-Z xom ¢Q
III III I o paw
y
•} 1 Q 2 1 S 1 5 z
I ' C) o
ZWw 11, 11' Q I
N O < III III O
J wnw II I i
r
II III K Q �
- III ,III U o
Q III III I Q z�
u-
UU N o
II II'
I— Q 11 =
I I W _ p 0
LLZ II I11 m�ZU
m0 III I11 I DOFZ
RQ II III w050
zw I I O WW ZC7
Q Q(w/1 II, III I NKVI JQ <
3 III III' �� e n
II 1 I o2 p
n _
IIIIV x - 7�
Z / -� �_�
_______ ___________— _____ _________
^ I I I I 1 ZcO__
• OK2 QN F a
� c
C
�aFr O
W / / AVM d0 -AHO 'l'd'd '11 O 000 I OQK N imi.rcL�Lv
/ o 2 AVM- dO -AHoRI '1'd'd Ci a w
ONIMUVd SSV 03SOdOW ��� lib' 1 (- W I III IQK H UUUUrfr
Q N Q 0 2 ONIMUVd SSVUO 03SOdO8d 5 Z "«
Qi 'iii II' wo0¢o.a IiI oZRE
--_ -_ __ _ ---
--- --- -- -- ---�f -- - / r wzm W EEC
- --- - --- - -- - -C - -- wo
w -- - -- r w
j
a I I I i m LL w
o Z
1 ZZ� I II Q m K m y
p F W w G �^ ' I I I Q a ° O Q
I III O r o ^W4?
�I I II W I WVr pViO
W
U
i-
f,,
I li
I
I
11
°off o I+ i li I� w� 5o a
N,rcZ
Vl. ¢W�y
11.1 z ¢ o
¢OFW
$
aNw Z-
�/�l
LIJ U
0" S3NV'1 VON310VH
f " I I I iI l io
I i oa 0
LL
g
°wow ° ,ondvq, ONINOZ
2w. li uz
z
w
I Z,-
U') zoaa n
C/1 LL
5mamm Q5
z °wo°QOm
U
g;
W '
z
pp
}tr
L
F w
oZ
Z
O
Zv
F-
Q�
Uc�i�UUU
U z
»3
U
z
Q Q p
w
w
I 'I
0
Ln
Yq
i 7gyg1 I 10 X
Ir I
qq
N U'
I 1 III I Q
"
CL
p IJ.IDVUl
zo
x w
U
\ X W
WIVI
J— --
_
8'li
0
U
^
z
I
mmWG
Q
2
°m2
0
li
¢
< ¢
Ow�Q dll
Z w-a iIll
NWwp
) zt
Q
SmQ Mil
��
135Oddlld-LLlf1W 5 m y
�111111I�11(�
m
Q n_ 2 I
W p I
LL
L�U/ z a a li
LL. Q op I I
2 W
5N
f6 W
O S< i
Q G j(
U p f
D I `.
W G
C
I
�U I
Q
Q' I
LLI
Z m
J
� I
X
IJ 'o I
W Q
5
L 0
IJ z
N
I
Q
L
LL
}a'
p
10/13/2015 9.B.'
Oj OOQsc
22
UJ
—11 iiI pN�
-Z xom ¢Q
III III I o paw
y
•} 1 Q 2 1 S 1 5 z
I ' C) o
ZWw 11, 11' Q I
N O < III III O
J wnw II I i
r
II III K Q �
- III ,III U o
Q III III I Q z�
u-
UU N o
II II'
I— Q 11 =
I I W _ p 0
LLZ II I11 m�ZU
m0 III I11 I DOFZ
RQ II III w050
zw I I O WW ZC7
Q Q(w/1 II, III I NKVI JQ <
3 III III' �� e n
II 1 I o2 p
n _
IIIIV x - 7�
Z / -� �_�
_______ ___________— _____ _________
^ I I I I 1 ZcO__
• OK2 QN F a
� c
C
�aFr O
W / / AVM d0 -AHO 'l'd'd '11 O 000 I OQK N imi.rcL�Lv
/ o 2 AVM- dO -AHoRI '1'd'd Ci a w
ONIMUVd SSV 03SOdOW ��� lib' 1 (- W I III IQK H UUUUrfr
Q N Q 0 2 ONIMUVd SSVUO 03SOdO8d 5 Z "«
Qi 'iii II' wo0¢o.a IiI oZRE
--_ -_ __ _ ---
--- --- -- -- ---�f -- - / r wzm W EEC
- --- - --- - -- - -C - -- wo
w -- - -- r w
j
a I I I i m LL w
o Z
1 ZZ� I II Q m K m y
p F W w G �^ ' I I I Q a ° O Q
I III O r o ^W4?
�I I II W I WVr pViO
W
U
i-
f,,
I li
I
I
11
°off o I+ i li I� w� 5o a
N,rcZ
Vl. ¢W�y
11.1 z ¢ o
¢OFW
MJ L
W I— apw¢
N�
LIJ U
f " I I I iI l io
I i oa 0
LL
g
z
w
I Z,-
U') zoaa n
C/1 LL
fag -
z °wo°QOm
U
g;
Q
N p w
ioaaaw
+a�°roaaa
re
t1 =
F-
Q�
Uc�i�UUU
U z
»3
U
U
Q Q p
w
w
I 'I
0
II
1'0- I I ii IZU
i 7gyg1 I 10 X
Ir I
� Q?I
N U'
I 1 III I Q
0
zo
x w
\ X W
WIVI
J— --
_
_ — — — --
Zs6'U':) °yam
-
Packet Page -216-
I I
n i �• I I r
S.
f " I I I iI l io
I i oa 0
LL
g
z
w
I Z,-
m
p Igo' I ¢ W
fiai
U
g;
Q
w� cic
p
Q�
Uc�i�UUU
IIzJ
I 'I
II
1'0- I I ii IZU
i 7gyg1 I 10 X
Ir I
N U'
I 1 III I Q
Egg, p I �M I
t. II. , II
n
zZN
to O n
z
¢
WOM ")wp
o>
w wz
O U Ili
tea¢ s
_ Qz
_ N0
O
Hz:e
oa_o
ZO1V
10/13/2015 9. B.
,0 025 -0.5 ` 1 15
GROSS DENSITY UNITS PER ACRE (UPA) Miles "
FOR FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES MPUD AND
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Cc °C�tC ° "tir, GsmaeaingaentDep A aP
Growth Management Department
Packet Page -217-
10/13/2015 93.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
ZONING DIVISION
CONSISTENCY REVIEW MEMORANDUM
To: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section
From: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section
Date: April 24, 2015 (Updated to July 21, 20151
Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review of Proposed Amendments to the First Assembly
Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (2nd memo)
PETITION NUMBER: PUDA- PL20140002461 [REV: 2]
PETITION NAME: First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Unit
Development (MPUD) Amendment
REQUEST: To make revisions affecting a 23.6 acre portion of the existing 68.78 -acre MPUD in accordance with
provisions of the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict (Subdistrict). The MPUD is presently approved
for a mixture of multi - family residential units, community facilities and church - related uses in a campus -type
setting, including: 296 multi - family units, a 2200 seat church auditorium, 200 seat chapel, 300 student school (K-
12), 300 child /adult care facility, 249 bed care unit facility, recreational vehicle parking, an outdoor recreational
area, and accessory uses. Only a portion of the land uses permitted by the subject MPUD have been developed.
Note part of this request is to make revisions to the existing PUD document, including provisions that address:
dwelling unit types, dwelling unit size, housing for qualified essential services personnel and terms of heir
availability, development phasing, relocation of planned access to align with recent roadway improvements —
including the removal of development commitments that have now been met. The individual changes
comprising this PUD amendment are found in PUD Exhibit B (Residential Development Standards), Exhibit C
(MPUD Master Plan) and Exhibit F (List of Developer Commitments). The other part of this proposal is an
Agreement with Collier County to develop affordable - workforce and market rate housing units for persons
involved with providing essential services.
The Subdistrict accommodates a mixed use, residential and institutional development on 68.78 acres. The
petition provides for the develop of up to 296 dwelling units — including 147 units for persons involved with
providing essential services in Collier County, comprising 60 affordable - workforce units, and 149 market rate
units for any prospective property owner.
LOCATION: The First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD is located at the northeast
corner of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and The Lord's Way, within Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use
District, Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict, as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and
addressed in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP); and is
zoned as the First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD.
The provisions of the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict proposed in the amendment are itemized
below, followed by staff analysis in [bold text].
The Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict comprises approximately 69 acres and is located on the
east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately one -half mile north of the Collier Boulevard /Rattlesnake
Hammock Road intersection.
—1—
Packet Page -218-
10/13/2015 9. B.
Main Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict provisions state "The purpose of this Subdistrict is to
provide community facility uses, primarily institutional uses and other non - commercial uses generally
serving the public at large, and residential uses, both affordable - workforce and market rate housing - all in a
setting to be compatible with surrounding land uses. The Subdistrict is intended to contain a mix of uses
and services which lessens traffic impacts upon the external transportation network and public services,
while serving the needs of the community at large." [These purposes and intents are provided for
throughout Subdistrict exhibits.] Subdistrict provisions go on to state "All development in this Subdistrict
shall comply with the following requirements and limitations:
Subdistrict section a. provides that "Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD." [The First
Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus was established as a PUD and is proposed
here as a PUD amendment.]
Subdistrict section b. provides that "Allowable land uses [are] community facilities such as churches, group
housing uses, cemeteries, private schools and colleges; child care facilities; residential dwelling units, not to
exceed 306 units; essential services; (and) parks, open space, and recreational uses:' [Exhibit A, Church
Related Uses and Development Intensity, lists these uses as principal or accessory uses, and is
unaffected by proposed amendments.]
Subdistrict section c. provides that "The maximum floor area for institutional and other non - residential uses
shall not exceed 368,000 square feet" [This limitation is not expressed in Exhibit A or other PUD
exhibits. Staff acknowledges that this square feet cap omission is within the existing PUD thus is not
an issue being created by this petitioner. The missing square footage cap is applicable to a portion of
the PUD not under this petitioner's control, raising a procedural issue. Staff acknowledges this
petitioner's restriction /inability to make the requested addition since the petitioner has no authority
to do so. Therefore, staff's analysis continues to note the PUD is missing this cap but acknowledges
the procedural limitation.]
Subdistrict section d. provides that "Of the 306 total dwelling units, a maximum of ten (10) units shall be
reserved for occupancy solely by church employees and church - related personnel and their families. The 10
church - related dwelling units will be considered incidental and accessory to the institutional uses within this
Subdistrict." [Provisions for these units are found within Exhibit A and are unaffected by proposed
amendments.]
Subdistrict section e. provides that "A requirement shall be put in place at the time of rezoning /PUD
amendment that all but nine (9) mobile home units currently on site shall be removed from the subject
property prior to the construction of any housing not reserved for church - related employees, staff and
program participants. The nine remaining mobile home units may serve as temporary adult care units for
program participants, and shall be removed as they are replaced by permanent residential structures,
permanent adult care units, or within twenty -four (24) months from the date of adoption of this Subdistrict,
whichever is sooner." [Application materials indicate these mobile homes have been removed from the
property. Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments, subsection 2.E. implements this provision — and
is deleted by this amendment.]
Subdistrict section f. provides that "One hundred forty -seven of the 296 affordable - workforce and market
rate housing units, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential
services in Collier County, as defined in the County's Local Housing Assistance Plan." [Exhibit F, List of
Developer Commitments, subsection 2.A. implements this provision — and is affected by changes
proposed in this amendment shortening period of time these units are reserved for persons involved
in providing essential services. Changes are also reflected in the accompanying Agreement
Confirmina ESP Densitv Bonus and Imposina Covenants and Restrictions on Real Property submitted
with the subject PUD amendment. The proposed changes are consistent with this criterion; see
�. further analysis on page 4 below.]
—2—
Packet Page -219-
10/13/2015 9.B.
Subdistrict section g. provides that "To achieve the density of approximately 4.28 dwelling units per acre, and
to allow development of the 192 non - church - related, non -base density dwelling units, the project shall
comply with one or more of the following:
1) the Affordable - Workforce Housing Density Bonus provisions of the Collier County Land Development
Code Ordinance Number 04 -41 in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict; or,
2) be designated as a Community Workforce Housing Innovation Program (CWHIP) Project by the State of
Florida and comply with all requirements and limitations of that designation, and provide a minimum of
eighty (80) essential services personnel dwelling units — comprised of a minimum of ten (10) dwelling
units for those earning less than 80% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of seventy
(70) dwelling units for those earning between 80% and 140% of the median income of Collier County; or,
3) enter into an agreement with Collier County assuring that no fewer than 147 affordable - workforce and
market rate housing units are constructed and, as they become available, will be offered first to persons
involved in providing essential services in Collier County, such agreement being in effect for not less
than fifteen (15) years, including a minimum of thirty -five (35) dwelling units for those earning no more
than 150% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of twenty -five (25) dwelling units for
those earning no more than 80% of the median income."
[The subject PUD amendment and its accompanying Agreement Confirming Affordable Housing
Density Bonus and Imposing Covenants and Restrictions on Real Property (Agreement) comply with
the third density bonus provision. The proposed changes are consistent with this criterion; see
further analysis on page 4 below.]
Subdistrict section h. provides that "No more than 57 market rate dwelling units shall be constructed prior to
the construction of all affordable - workforce housing dwelling units:' [Exhibit F, List of Developer
Commitments, subsection 2.C. implements this provision — and is affected by changes proposed in
this amendment. Changes are also reflected in the accompanying Agreement submitted with the
subject PUD amendment. Paragraph 25 of that Agreement is consistent with this provision. The
proposed PUD changes are consistent with this criterion; see further analysis on page 4 below.]
Subdistrict section i. provides that "At the time of rezoning /PUD amendment, the maximum occupancy per
dwelling unit in the 296 non - church - related dwelling units shall be addressed, as deemed appropriate by the
Board of County Commissioners." [Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments, subsection 2.D.
implements this provision — and is affected by changes proposed in this amendment. Changes are
also reflected in the accompanying Agreement submitted with the subject PUD amendment.]
Subdistrict subsection j. provides that "At the time of rezoning /PUD amendment, consideration shall be
given to increasing the landscaping requirements along The Lord's Way beyond existing Land Development
Code requirements." [Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments, section 4. implements this provision —
and is unaffected by proposed amendments.]
Subdistrict section k. provides that "At the time of rezoning /PUD amendment, the petitioner shall be
required to mitigate for the project's impacts upon affected roadways in accordance with the concurrency
management system and as otherwise determined appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners."
[Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments, section 3. implements this provision — and is unaffected by
proposed amendments.]
Subdistrict section I. provides that "Residential development shall be phased. Phase One development shall
be limited to 147 dwelling units for persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County and 10
church - related dwelling units. Phase Two development shall consist of the remaining 149 market rate units,
plus any units allowed but not constructed during Phase One. For the 149 market rate dwelling units in
Phase Two, no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until improvements to the existing deficient segment
of Davis Boulevard are complete:' [Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments, subsection 3.D.
implements this provision — and is affected by changes proposed in the subject PUD amendment.
—3—
Packet Page -220-
10/13/2015 93.
Changes are also reflected in the accompanying Agreement submitted with the subject PUD
amendment. The proposed changes are consistent with this criterion; see further analysis on page 4
below.]
This MPUD allows development of up to 296 affordable - workforce and market rate dwelling units not reserved
for church - related employees or staff. Of these 296 dwelling units, 236 would be market rate (80 %) - including a
portion of those intended for people employed by occupations or professions considered essential (essential
services personnel or, ESP). Of the 60 units remaining, 35 would be for those earning <- -150% of median income
(12 %), and 25 units would be for those earning < -80% of median income (8 %) [20% gross affordable- workforce].
A formal Agreement to provide housing to people employed by occupations or professions considered essential
is submitted with the subject PUD amendment. The full evaluation of this Agreement is deferred to the
Department of Housing, Human and Veteran Services review personnel. The proposal makes 147 residential
units available to these people as an essential part of this Subdistrict. This MPUD provides a mix of housing
types especially for these people - providing 87 market rate units, 35 gap units and 25 workforce units. This
35/25 mix varies from the standard [Collier County] Affordable - Workforce Housing Density Bonus requirements
of 30/30 in order to reach the desired density of approximately 4.28 dwelling units per acre. This variation from
County standards is explicitly allowed by the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict and presumably
justified given the commitment to providing no less than a total 147 housing units to people employed by
occupations or professions considered essential. As previously noted, paragraph 25 of the Agreement proposes
to allow proportionate provision of the 60 required Affordable Housing units which is not consistent with the
Subdistrict.
The affordable - workforce housing component is not proposed to meet the definitions and requirements of the
Collier County Affordable - Workforce Housing Density Bonus Program, but provides a mixture of Gap and
Workforce housing unique to this Subdistrict.
Collier County continues to need affordable housing for people employed by occupations or professions
considered essential - including teachers, educators, other school district employees, community college and
university employees, police and fire personnel, health care personnel, skilled building trades personnel and
government employees.* This MPUD commits 147 of these 296 units, as they become available, to being offered
first to these persons in particular need and demand. This first -offer availability is guaranteed for fifteen years,
each time one of these 147 housing units is vacated.
* [Staff note: The occupations and professions considered essential are defined in the County's Local
Housing Assistance Plan, updated October 10, 2006.]
The County benefits from ensuring 147 ESP residential units are available for 15 years and the developer
benefits from 192 buildable bonus units.
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new developments to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land
area. [Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to Zoning and Land Development Review staff
as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. However, staff notes that in reviewing the
appropriateness of the requested uses /densities on the subject site, the compatibility analysis is to be
comprehensive and include a review of both the subject property and surrounding or nearby properties
with regard to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks,
landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount
and type of open space and location, traffic generation /attraction, etc.]
In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County,
the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where
applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text].
Objective 7, Policies 7.1 through 7.7, of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) were approved on October 26, 2004.
This Objective and policies incorporate certain "Smart Growth" provisions into the FLUE. This formulative
process was one of Collier County's earliest opportunities to apply more of the practices found in the Toward
-4-
Packet Page -221-
10/13/2015 9. B.
Better Places - The Community Character Plan for Collier County Florida. The Community Character Plan
provides the County with a policy document featuring the most useful aspects of traditional neighborhood
design (TND), smart growth, traffic calming, new urbanism and other contemporary planning practices. ''-N
Objective 7:
In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character
Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to
the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new
development and redevelopment projects, where applicable.
Policy 7.1:
The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector
and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing
requirements of the Land Development Code. [This PUD fronts the canal paralleling Collier Boulevard, with
no direct access provided. Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan, depicts indirect access to Collier Boulevard (CR
951), classified as an arterial road in the Transportation Element, via The Lord's Way.]
Policy 7.2:
The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on
nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan,
depicts one access point on The Lord's Way with internal accesses provided for the tracts within the PUD.
Subject Tract 'G' site provides only traffic circulation and parking areas. All vehicular traffic accesses
Collier Boulevard (CR 951) via The Lord's Way.]
Policy 7.3:
All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection
points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of
local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element.
[Local street connections with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments are not disallowed by
other ordinances or regulations and appear to be feasible on two sides of the subject site, as follows:
• Land to the north this PUD is approved for the Hacienda Lakes MPUD /DRI, where a water
management feature is planned along the full length of the common boundary - making
vehicular interconnection infeasible.
• Hacienda Lakes MPUD /DRI is also approved to the east of this PUD, where residential
development is planned along approximately one -half the length of the common boundary -
making vehicular interconnection feasible. For the subject PUD, Exhibit E, Requested Deviation
No. 5 presently provides for "a potential future access to the east" and Exhibit C, MPUD Master
Plan depicts an interconnection point along the boundary between these adjoining properties,
with the labeling, "FUTURE POTENTIAL INTERCONNECTION:'
Within the Hacienda Lakes PUD a water management feature and site reserved for a future EMS
station are planned along approximately one -half the length of the common boundary - making
vehicular interconnection infeasible.
• The Henderson Creek Canal parallels Collier Boulevard along the westerly boundary of the entire
subject PUD; Tracts A', 'B', 'C' and 'E' lie adjacently west of the residential subject Tract 'G' portion
of the PUD, comprising church and educational related facilities, FPL easement, job training and
rehabilitation services, and existing preserve area. Exhibit E, Requested Deviation No. 5 presently
provides relief from LDC requirements for internal interconnection, allowing "private access to
both the church campus and multi - family development to be private entrances and not require
interconnection between the two uses:']
-S-
Packet Page -222-
10/13/2 01 5 9.B.
Policy 7.4:
The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities,
common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [As to walkable communities,
the PUD provides an only marginally walkable design, with sidewalks located on only one side of single -
loaded streets (with dwelling units on only one side of street). Exhibit E, Deviation No. 4C presently
provides relief from the LDC requirement for sidewalks on both sides of the street, allowing "a sidewalk
on only one side of the internal access drives for the multi - family [residential] subject Tract 'G':'
A "SIDEWALK INTERCONNECTION ON TRACT "G "" is indicated on Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan. Exhibit
E, Deviation No. 4B presently provides relief from the LDC requirement for a 6 foot sidewalk and bike
lane... along The Lord's Way, allowing "a 5 foot wide sidewalk to be constructed within a five foot
easement area on subject Tract 'G', the multi - family [residential] tract."
With regard to common open spaces, preserve areas and civic facilities, the PUD presently provides the
sixty percent open space the LDC requires; permits various recreational uses and facilities, and open
space uses and structures. Designated preserve areas permit passive recreational areas, nature trails and
boardwalks.
With regard to a blend of densities and a range of housing prices and types, the application identifies
multi - family residential units (with 750 sq. ft. minimum floor areas for 1, 2 and 3 bedroom units. This
minimum floor area is reduced from the presently approved 850 sq. ft. and one bedroom units are a new
addition. Approximately one -half of the 296 residential units planned (147 units) are intended for
persons involved in providing essential services (ESP), including teachers, educators, other school district
employees, community college and university employees, police and fire personnel, health care
personnel, skilled building trades personnel and government employees; with sixty of these ESP units
being affordable- workforce housing units.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
Aside from advancing the subject PUD amendment, the petitioner is entering into an Agreement with the
County for assuring that no fewer than 147 affordable - workforce and market rate housing units are constructed
and, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier
County - such Agreement being in effect for not less than fifteen (15) years, including a minimum of thirty -five
(35) dwelling units for those earning no more than 150% of the median income of Collier County, and a
minimum of twenty -five (25) dwelling units for those earning no more than 80% of the median income. The
Agreement accompanies the subject PUD amendment. Full evaluation of the Agreement itself is deferred to the
Department of Housing, Human and Veteran Services review personnel.
Exhibit F, List of Developer Commitments, provides that "the period of time that the dwelling units will be
reserved for persons providing essential services will be a minimum of 14 days from the date of issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for the initial offering and 14 days from the date a unit is offered thereafter."
It is understood that after the ESP - related time period expires the affordable - workforce units remain affordable -
workforce offerings and the number of market rate units does not increase through the Agreement's effective
period of 15 years.
Acceptable Developer Commitments ensure that the number of AWH units shall not be fewer than 60
during the 15 -year life of the Agreement; and, that the number of units first offered to ESP shall not be
fewer than 147 during the 15 -year life of the Agreement.
Based upon the above analysis, the proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment may be deemed
consistent with the FLUE.
PETITION ON CITYVIEW
cc: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager, Zoning Services Section
David Weeks, A1CP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section
�-.., Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division
G: Compl Consistency Reviews\2015
GAMES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews120151PUDATUDA -14 -2461 First Assembly REV3c_FNL.docx
-6-
Packet Page -223-
10/13/2015 93.
NIM Summary
First Assemblies Ministries MPUD Amendment
PUDA- PL20140002461
May 5, 2015
5:30 PM
Collier County South Regional Library
Meeting Room "B"
Note: This is a summary of the NIM. A recording is also provided.
Attendees:
On behalf of Applicant:
Bob Mulhere, Richard Yovanovich, David Torres, Gary Haines, Paula McMichael
County Staff:
Nancy Gundlach
Approximately 15 members of the public attended, including Commissioner Donna Fiala
Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the other consultants, and County staff. He
explained the NIM process, the process for approval, provided an overview of the project, and also went
over the proposed changes to the PUD and the PUD master plan.
The members of the public who attended identified themselves as residents of Naples Lakes Country
Club. The following questions were asked:
What's going on there?
Clarified that there are no real changes to the existing PUD, the amendment only affects Tract G, and the
developer is proposing a rental community, 296 units, 4 stories, as currently allowed. No details or
construction plans yet, but should be available, including architectural elevations, by the time this
petition is ready to be scheduled for public hearing. Multifamily residential is the only permitted use.
Do you mean apartments, condos, townhomes, single houses, skyscrapers?
Multifamily excludes single family homes. We are talking about something like the apartments across
the street [Aster Lely apartments, across Lely Cultural Parkway from the library].
What population are you targeting?
The current PUD and Growth Management Plan Subdistrict require housing for essential services
personnel (ESP), and we are not proposing to change that. Priority must be given to ESP for 147 units,
with these 147 units held for a certain length of time. That period of time is currently being negotiated
H:\2014 \2014085 \WP \PUD \NIM \NIM Summary 5- 5- 15.doex
Packet Page -224-
10/13/2015 9.B.
with the county. Only a certain number of the units are income - restricted. A minimum of 35 units have
to be provided for those earning no more than 150 percent of the median income for Collier County, and
a minimum of 25 units have to be provided to those earning no more than 80 percent of the median
income. The income limits are based on the Area Median Income (AMI) [a statistic published by the
federal government, Department of Housing and Urban Development.] The current AMI for a family of
four for the Naples -Marco Island Metropolitan Statistical Area for a family of four is $66,500.
The only entrance /egress is onto Lord's Way, and all of these trips will be turning onto Collier
Blvd. Are there any improvements to the intersection of Lord's Way and Collier Blvd.?
There is a commitment for a proportionate share agreement when the traffic light is warranted; however
there are no improvements scheduled at this time. The amount of trips created by these units will not be
sufficient to warrant the light on their own. There are no level of service issues based on this
development.
What are the amendments to the PUD referenced by "deletion of stipulations regarding
transportation and affordable housing that are no longer applicable "?
There were commitments in the PUD that have already been fulfilled and are therefore being removed.
These included phasing of the project, which is no longer proposed; removing mobile homes from the
site, which has been done; and delaying issuance of certificates of occupancy until improvements to
11—N Davis Blvd. were completed, and those improvements have been made.
You are adding daycare services for children of residents of the development as an accessory use.
Is this a low- income development?
We anticipate that because these are rentals, they might attract young families, who are not ready to
purchase a home, for whom the daycare services would be an attractive amenity. The services would
only be for residents of the project.
There will be amenities provided in this project that will ensure this is not a "low- income" development,
such as a gated entry, resort-style pool, garages. We will make those commitments in the PUD.
How can this be an upscale development when you are reducing unit sizes from 850 SF to 750 SF?
The reduced size is for one - bedroom units only.
How many one - bedroom units?
Not sure, but we are willing to make a commitment that the number of one - bedroom units will be
limited to 20 percent of the total number.
2
H:\2014\2014085 \WP \PUD \NIM \NIM Summary 5- 5- 15.docx
Packet Page -225-
10/13/2015 9. B.
What are the sizes of the 2- bedroom units?
Right around 1,000 SF right now, plus or minus. Three - bedrooms are in the 1300 or so range.
What amenities can you fit in here or have you planned on?
All of the same amenities, except possibly tennis courts, that were provided for the Vincentian Village
MPUD, will be provided here. Those commitments will be in the PUD before this goes to CCPC. There
will be both construction and site - related commitments to ensure the quality of the development.
Will these units be rented for less than a year?
We anticipate following the market for the rental leases, which are typically annual, but some are
currently offering 7 -month leases. We would not do weekly rentals.
You are talking about "ESP" as teachers and nurses, but really anyone who meets the income
requirements can live here. Why can't you build larger, nicer units? We have plenty of low-
income housing, but we don't have housing for young professionals.
Young single professionals when they first move here may be looking for a smaller, one - bedroom unit.
The development needs to be competitive in the market place, and having a range of unit types will help
do that. The owner talked about how he also owns the property to the north, east, and south, and that he '"�
wants to construct a community that he thinks will fit in with and be complementary to development
plans for the surrounding area.
When will this go from conceptual to some details we can look at?
SDP will be into the county for review by the end of June. This will include all the details — landscaping,
fences, lighting, architectural. May not include details on signage.
Will the community be gated?
Yes, but the gate will not be manned.
Will you have on -site management?
Yes, but it will not be 24 -7.
How many lots are in Lord's Way? What is the price point for those units?
There are 75 lots, probably starting at around $400,000.
n
H. ^2014\2014085 \WP \PUD \NIM \NIM Summary 5- 5- 15.docx
Packet Page -226-
10/13/2015 93.
The property owner clarified that Swamp Buggy is there to stay [not in response to a question].
Hacienda Lakes is not the title holder for that property. There are no plans to remove the use.
Randy Johnson from Swamp Buggy was in attendance and recommended that a commitment, similar to
the one placed in the Lord's Way RPUD, be included with respect to the noise associated with Swamp
Buggy Races.
What are your development plans for the adjacent areas?
There is a plat for the Lord's Way RPUD. There is nothing pending for that portion of Hacienda Lakes,
as development of the DRI is starting at the southern end of that property, around the extension of
Rattlesnake Hammock. This development (First Assemblies) will be built before the adjacent area of
Hacienda Lakes.
Will there be additional access points built with Hacienda Lakes?
Yes, there will be another bridge built to 951 and a "back- entrance" connected to the future Benfield
Road that will connect to the Rattlesnake Hammock extension.
What is the timeline for approval?
Tentatively, a CCPC hearing in July and BCC in September when the board returns from summer
recess. The SDP would be submitted in June, and that process typically takes about 10 months.
Construction would start in late 2016 and continue for two years.
Are there any plans for the existing church building?
Not part of this request, however, we understand that the building has been bought and the new owner
seems committed to the site and has plans to use it as a church. The property owner would like to see the
property finished and occupied.
The meeting concluded at approximately 6:15 PM.
4
H:\2014\2014085 \WP \PUD \NIM \NIM Summary 5- 5- 15.docx
Packet Page -227-
10/13/2015 93.
Al"i _ Collier County RKEIVED
"M
Public Schools
,JI 3 2015
Office of the Superintendent
HOSE [VIONTES, INC
July 20, 2015
Bob Mulhere
Hole Montes
950 Encore Way
Naples, Florida 34110
Re: Essential Service Personnel Housing Projects
-. :e•
I wanted to take this moment to thank you for your July 8, 2015, email concerning your
client's plan to construct affordable housing and their effort to submit an amendment to
the existing PUD that would not include any additional density. What I found interesting
and important, among other things, is that not only will the anticipated 147 units be
offered first to essential service personnel, which would indeed include District
instructional and non - instructional personnel, but also that 60 of the units will have
household income targets attached to them for the purposes of affordability.
We believe a housing plan that is concerned with helping our employees, as well as
helping other essential service personnel working in Collier County is a project that
certainly seems intended to benefit the community and contribute to the recruiting and
retaining of essential service personnel and their families.
Thank you again for making me and the District aware of the project's status.
Sincerely,
Kamela Patton, Ph.D.
Superintendent
5775 Osceola Trail ) Naples, Florida 34109 [ p: 239.377.0001 i f: 239.377.0181
E Packet Page -228- om 1 www,collierscliools.com
10/13/2015 9.B.
July 9, 2015
To Whom It May Concern:
The NCH Healthcare System supports all local efforts to add affordable housing capacity for our
community.
As the largest private employer with a year round work force of over 3,000 which swells to about
4,000 folks seasonally, we have a huge need for affordable, safe, conveniently located housing.
Although we all live in rapidly changing times but there is always a need for residencies for our
colleagues.
There is a nation -wide shortage of skilled health care workers including nurses, technicians, and
all sorts of support personnel. Considering the range of homes available near NCH's three
campuses there is always a demand for more affordable housing.
NCH expects to continue to grow as our Collier County develops. We all support each other and
whenever there is an imbalance, be it excess or deficient, waste is created. Having a structure to
where large organizations help each other with capacity issues decreases waste and adds value
for all concerned.
We have been through many cycles over the years. Change is always difficult but repetition of
past shortages makes no sense particularly when we know better.
Please let me know if I can add any further support for the cause of additional work force
housing.
Sincerely,
Allen S. Weiss, MD, MBA, FACP, FACR
President and CEO
Packet Page -229-
August 10, 2015
Mr. Bob Mulhere, FAICP, Director of Planning
Hole Montes
950 Encore Way
Naples, Florida 34110
Dear Mr. Mulhere,
The Collier County Sheriff's Office has a growing concern regarding the important issue
of housing our current and future workforce. While the economic recovery in our
community has been welcomed and all indicators are that growth will continue in Collier
County, the increasing median housing prices and the shrinking residential rental
inventory and rising rates could limit housing options for the men and women of the
Collier County Sheriffs Office. When individuals and families cannot afford to live in the
community they serve, their options then include relocating to another area (often out of
county) and finding employment closer to that home or living outside of the community
they work in and commuting to their duty assignment. The former creates a staffing
shortage issue in the organization and the later has the potential to disengage that
member and their family from the very community they are serving and protecting. An
engaged employee in the community where they work often creates greater community
connections and more career successes for both the employee and the community.
I support the discussion and investigating potential solutions to this challenging situation
and appreciate the work you are doing to address this issue.
Sincerely,
r
C hT-J. , Sheriff
ollier Co nty, Florida
KJR: wsc
cc: File
"Service to Others Before Self'
Packet Page -230-
DECEIVE
AUG - 2 2 '01
i-I0LE MON F S, INC
10/13/2015 9.B.
The Greater Naples Chamber of Commer(e~
Leading Businesses. Leading (ommunities.
July 23, 2015
VIA E -MAIL: timnance @collier og v.net
The Honorable Tim Nance, Chairman
and Board of County Commissioners
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303
Naples, Florida 34112
Dear Chairman Nance and Commissioners:
The Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce recognizes that workforce housing is a key
and increasingly significant component in creating an attractive business climate, promoting
meaningful economic diversification, and sustaining a preeminent quality of life in Collier
County. We accordingly commend the Board of County Commissioners for its leadership in
acknowledging the importance of this issue and encouraging the work of your staff and advisory
committee in this regard.
The Chamber recently asked its Public Policy Committee to convene other civic,
community and charitable organizations, including the Community Foundation of Collier
County, the United Way, CBIA and NABOB, to assess how as the economy recovers and home
prices rise we can support a coordinated effort to address the growing challenge of meeting our
community's workforce housing demands. A joint committee of non - profits met twice this
spring with representatives of the county's Affordable Housing Advisory Committee and we
anticipate this issue will be an important Chamber priority as our new fiscal year gets underway.
We recognize however that developers who engage in workforce housing face significant
obstacles to justify their time, capital and expertise. We therefore urge the county to do whatever
it can to incentivize workforce housing developers and we look forward to finding ways to work
with other interested parties throughout the community to support the county's efforts.
Very truly yours,
J. Dudley Goodlette
Chairman
2390 Tamiami Trail N. Suite 210 — Naples, FL 34103 -4484 — Phone (239) 262.6376 Fax (239) 262 -8374 — www.napleschamber.org
Packet Page -231-
CIbiIC iV0 ices r� z'
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE
Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, September 22, 2015, in
the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor,
Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL.,
}�, e_ _d .o��� will, consider the
the way o County Commissioners \YVV/ V. consi
enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence
at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows:
The purpose of the hearing is to consider:
AN ORDINANCEOFTHE BOARD OFCOUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE
NUMBER 08 -41, THE FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES
EDUCATION & REHABILITATION CAMPUS . MPUD, AS
AMENDED, TO REMOVE TWO- FAMILY DWELLINGS FROM
PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, AND ADD DETACHED AND
ATTACHED GARAGES, AND DAYCARE SERVICES FOR
CHILDREN TO PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES IN TRACT G;
TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM FLOOR AREA FOR MULTI- FAMILY
DWELLING UNITS FROM 850 SQUARE FEET TO 800 SQUARE
FEET; TO REMOVE THE PROHIBITION ON ONE BEDROOM
NON - CHURCH - RELATED DWELLING UNITS; TO ADD A CROSS
REFERENCE TO A NEW ESSENTIAL SERVICES PERSONNEL
HOUSING AGREEMENT; TO REMOVE - AFFORDABLE
HOUSING DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS AND TRANSFER
THEM TO THE NEW ESSENTIAL SERVICES PERSONNEL
HOUSING AGREEMENT; TO ADD NEW DESIGN STANDARDS
FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON TRACT G; TO ADD
A NEW TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPER COMMITMENT
RELATING TO RESERVATION OF RIGHT -OF -WAY ALONG THE
SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PUD; TO ADD A NEW PLANNING
DEVELOPER COMMITMENT RELATING TO DISCLOSURE OF
SWAMP BUGGY RACES; AND TO REVISE THE PUD MASTER
PLAN TO RELOCATE THE EXISTING ACCESS POINT NEAR
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY TO ALIGN
WITH THE ENTRY FOR THE LORD'S WAY RPUD TO THE
SOUTH FOR THE PUD PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 69t
ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BLVD. (C.R.
951), APPROXIMATELY 1/2 MILE NORTH OF RATTLESNAKE -
HAMMOCK RD. (C.R. 864), IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND
BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(PETITION NUMBER PUDA- PL20140002461)
A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the
Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are
invited to attend and be heard.
NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must
register with the County manager prior to presentation of
the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be
limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual
to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged.
If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or
organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item.
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in
the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum
of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case,
written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall
be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of
seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in
presentations before the Board will become a permanent part
of the record.
Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board
will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and
therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is based.
Ifyou are aperson with adisabilitywho needs any accommodation
in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at
no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,
located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-
5356, ;239) 252 -8380, at least two days prior to the meeting.
Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available
in the Board of County Commissioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
TIM NANCE, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
Septemb Packet Page -232- No. 667994
10/13/2015 9. B.
Z
D
�o
r
m
w
0
D
s?
rD
LA
0-
r1
Ln
r
(D
3
Cr
CD
I
N
N
0
Ln
N
r+