Agenda 06/23/2015 Item #16A216/23/2015 16.A.21.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to review the April 2015 beach survey results and endorse a staff
recommendation to not renourish the Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay, Park Shore or Naples
beaches in the Fall (November) of 2015.
OBJECTIVE: Obtain concurrence and endorse a recommendation that no beach renourishment
is required in FY2015/16 for the Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay, Park Shore or Naples beaches based
on the April 2015 beach survey.
CONSIDERATIONS: The results of the annual beach surveys taken earlier this month have
just been received. Based on the survey results, staff is recommending NO beach renourishment
this November 2015. Staff is also recommending continued monitoring of these beaches over
the next year. If significant hot spots develop during the year, then targeted renourishment can
occur. This recommendation is contingent on Humiston and Moore's review and confirmation
of the beach width/fill analysis conducted by county staff to determine if beach renourishment is
necessary in November 2015. Should Humiston and Moore's review and recommendations not
corroborate staff's findings, this item will be resubmitted to the Board with revised
recommendations.
Vanderbilt Beach
When compared to the 100 foot design standard plus 3 years of advanced renourishment, the
Vanderbilt average beach width is 115 feet and has an excess volume over the advanced
renourishment requirements of 11,340 CY's. It has 2 locations where the advanced fill
requirements are not met; R -25 requires approximately 1.650 CY's to fill the advanced
renourishment template and R -27 requires 900 CY's to fill its advanced renourishment template.
These volumes are relatively insignificant and will not be able to justify a renourishment event.
Also, please remember that the Vanderbilt beach was essentially renourished to file 6 years of
advanced renourishment standard in 2013 as a result of TS Fay's damages.
Park Shore Beach
The Park Shore beach has a design standard of 85 feet and currently averages just over 100 feet
in width with an excess of 15,760 CY's of fill above the 3 vear advanced fill requirements. It
has 3 locations where it does not meet the advanced fill requirements; R -44 would require
approximately 2,150 CY's to meet advanced renourishment requirements, R -46 would require
2,300 CY's to meet advanced renourishment requirements and R -49 would require an additional
2,500 CY's for advanced renourishment. These volumes are also relatively insignificant.
Pelican Bay Beaches
The Pelican Bay beaches were also surveyed and analyzed. The Pelican Bay beaches encompass
the area between R -31 to R -37. These beaches have a 100 foot design standard and the
renourishment has been paid for by the Pelican Bay Services Division since they are designated
as private beaches without public access. This beach segment average 105 feet in width with the
beaches between R33 to R -37 requiring approximately 11,800 CY's to fill the advanced
renourishment requirements. There is plenty of sand at R -31. R -32 and R -33 but the beach width
has reduced to between 95 feet and 90 feet at the southern sections. The northern Pelican Bay
Packet Page -1136-
6/23/2015 16.A.21.
Pavilion is located at R -35.5 where the beach is approximately 93 feet wide. I would not
recommend renourishing the Pelican Bay beaches this year but this is a Pelican Bay decision.
The renourishment cost would be expensive because of the fixed cost for engineering,
pennitting, monitoring, mobilization and the small quantities involved.
Naples Beaches
The Naples beach was renourished last year and will not be renourished for another two years.
Clam Pass Beach
This beach has not been renourished since 2007 and is in need of renourishment but cannot be
renourished due to the lack of a USACE pennit. Beach renourishment for the Clam Pass Park is
tied up with the dredging permit that the Pelican Bay Services Division is obtaining.
The County commission can direct staff to add the renourishment of the Clam Pass Park to the
new 15 year permit application that CZM is pursuing if so desired. Having the capability to
renourish this beach from both the dredging of Clam Pass for tidal flushing and also with the
new Master 15 year beach renourishment pen-nit will give the County additional flexibility to
maintain and renourish this beach.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds have been budgeted for a beach renourislunent in the Fall of
FY2015. If not necessary, these funds will be returned to reserves after confirmation that no
significant hot spots will develop.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan
related to this action.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: At the Coastal Advisory Committee May 14, 2015
meeting this item was unanimously recommended for approval by an 8 to 0 vote. At the Tourist
Development Council May 28, 2015 meeting this item was unanimously recommended for
approval by a 6 to 0 vote.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been approved as to form and legality and
requires majority vote for approval. — CMG
RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to review the April 2015 beach survey results and
endorse a staff recommendation to not renourish the Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay, Park Shore or
Naples beaches in the Fall (November) of 2015.
Prepared By: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Coastal Zone Management
Attachment A: Staff Analysis
Packet Page -1137-
6/23/2015 16.A.21.
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 16.16.A.16.A.21.
Item Summary: Recommendation to review the April 2015 beach survey results and
endorse a staff recommendation to not renourish the Vanderbilt, Pelican Bay, Park Shore or
Naples beaches in the Fall (November) of 2015.
Meeting Date: 6/9/2015
Prepared By
Name: HambrightGail
Title: Accountant, Growth Management Department
5/14/2015 4:47:08 PM
Submitted by
Title: Accountant, Growth Management Department
Name: HambrightGail
5/14/2015 4:47:09 PM
Approved By
Name: McAlpinGary
Title: Manager - Coastal Management Programs, Growth Management Department
Date: 5/14/2015 4:56:15 PM
Name: PuigJudy
Title: Operations Analyst, Growth Management Department
Date: 5/15/2015 3:28:48 PM
Name: Markiewicz.Toanne
Title: Division Director - Purchasing & Gen Svc, Administrative Services Department
Date: 5/16/2015 4:06:00 PM
Name: JohnsonScott
Title: Manager - Procurement, Administrative Services Department
Date: 5/18/2015 10:04:31 AM
Packet Page -1138-
6/23/2015 16.A.21.
Name: NorthrupAdam
Title: Procurement Specialist, Administrative Services Department
Date: 5/18/2015 3:38:53 PM
Name: PattersonAmy
Title: Manager - Impact Fees & EDC, Growth Management Department
Date: 5/19/2015 12:37:17 PM
Name: KearnsAllison
Title: Manager Financial & Operational Support, Growth Management Department
Date: 5/19/2015 3:11:02 PM
Name: Tara Castillo
Title: ManagemenCBudget Analyst, Growth Management Department
Date: 5/19/2015 3:12:52 PM
Name: GreeneColleen
Title: Assistant County Attorney, CAO General Services
Date: 5/19/2015 3:18:20 PM
Name: CasalanguidaNick
Title: Deputy County Manager, County Managers Office
Date: 5/20/2015 10:56:20 AM
Name: OberrathKaren
Title: Accountant, Senior, Grants Management Office
Date: 5/20 /2015 2:20:44 PM
Name: GreeneColleen
Title: Assistant County Attorney, CAO General Services
Date: 5/20/2015 2:46:39 PM
Name: Stan] eyTherese
Title: Manager - Grants Compliance, Grants Management Office
Date: 5/20/2015 5:16:21 PM
Name: KlatzkowJeff
Title: County Attorney,
Date: 5/21/2015 8:16:57 AM
Name: CasalanguidaNick
Title: Deputy County Manager, County Managers Office
Date: 5/22/2015 5:13:02 PM
Packet Page -1139-
6/23/2015 16.A.21.
J
Packet Page -1140-
6/23/2015 16.A.21.
- -Sawa :)n the 2005200£ FtC Template
-Baser on me available voteme seaward of me desagn neaclr dth oenwan +�
nAVG (2713 berm elevatr)Aj and the nearshore praftre c,=j,
'--- Rater: provtoed by 8f
Packet Page -1141-
BEACH WIDTH - VOLUME ANALYSIS
FDEP
D
'2014 -02
m?
**Fill
-2015 -04
2015.04
Total
Fill
3 -Year Weighted
Diff.
Total
Mon.
Standard
O
4
Effective
0
W
Advance
Advance Effective
X
2015 -04
C
N
N
Width
Width
Distance
Volume
Volume Fill - 2015 Distance
Erosion
3 -Yr Ero.
G
C
(Feet)
m O
w
c . G
a
C
(CYJFt)
(CY)
b
J
7
CI
(C)?
R -22
100
o, a 3
U
v
U 2
a
2%
7
2
e
c
c
117
114
1.013
3.8'
3,801
- -Sawa :)n the 2005200£ FtC Template
-Baser on me available voteme seaward of me desagn neaclr dth oenwan +�
nAVG (2713 berm elevatr)Aj and the nearshore praftre c,=j,
'--- Rater: provtoed by 8f
Packet Page -1141-
BEACH WIDTH - VOLUME ANALYSIS
FDEP
Design
'2014 -02
2015 -04
**Fill
-2015 -04
2015.04
Total
Fill
3 -Year Weighted
Diff.
Total
Mon.
Standard
Beach
Beach
Effective
Advance
Advance
Advance Effective
Erosion 3 -yr
2015 -04
Dift/
to MHW
Width
Width
Distance
Volume
Volume Fill - 2015 Distance
Erosion
3 -Yr Ero.
Reach
(Feet)
(Feet)
(Feet)
(Feet)
(CYJFt)
(CY)
(CY)
( %)
(CY13 -Yr) (CY/3 -Yr)
(CY)
(C)?
R -22
100
120
112
131
3.3
431
2%
-458
-28 '
R -23
100
117
114
1.013
3.8'
3,801
12%
-3,539
262
R -24
100
114
112
1,070
3.5
3,714
13%
-3,738
-25
R -25
100
108
106
1,033
1.9
1,975
io
12%
;0
-3,609
-1.635
0
R -26
100
139
125
989
84
8,274
a
12%
-3,455
4,819
R -27
100
125
109
L 099
2.7
2,935
P
13 %
0
C'
-3,824
-889
R -28
100
120
119
1,026
5.8
5,945
12%
-3,583
2362
R -29
100
123
119
942
61
5,713
11%
-3,292
2,421
R -30
100
125
123
1,033
7.4
7.660 j
12%
-3,609
4,051
R -31
100
130
131
1,022
9.7
9.928
17%
-1,676
6,252
R -32
100
122
129
1.012
91
9,186
17%
-1,659
7,527
R -33
100
103
105
1,022
1.6
1,609
17%
M
- 1,676
-67
R -34
100
100
95
1,012
-1.6
-1,653
ot
17%
a
-1,659
-3,312
w
rn
R -35
100
104
94
998
-2 -1
-2,111
16%
c
-1,637
- 3,747
M
R -36
100
96
90
764
-13
-2,541
13%
-1,253
-3,794
R -37
100
93
95
264
-17
-453
4%
-434
-887
R -38
R -39
R -40
R-41
Noun
ano Soutr of C;a,r, Fuss
R -41
R -43
R-44
85
76
80
432
-18
-798 (
4%
-1,354
-2,153
R -45
85
99
96
1,078
4.0
4,279
10%
-3,379
900
R-46
85
98
88
1,040
0.9
967
10%
-3,262
•2,295
R-47
85
101
105
953
6.4
6,066
90%
-2,989
3,077
R-48
85
64
96
1,000
3.9
3.949
9%
-3.136
813
R-49
85
97
58
17,077
08
889
10 010
3.376
2,480'
w
T -50
85
120
117
1; 208
102
12.379
11%
a
-3;787
8,592
u
R -61
85
123
105
108
6.7
7.384
10%
-3,473
3,912
R -52
85
110
100
967
49
4,728
9%
-3,032
1 -696
R -53
85
99
95
1,060
33
3,465
10%
-3,322
143
T -54
85
124
113
735
8.0
5,867
7%
-2,305
3,561
U -55
85
108
122
0
1113
0
0%
0
0
R -56
T -57
vin
o`2:actcrs Pass
'-Annual
- *3 -Year Advance
Reach
Erosion
Erosion Fill - 2015
(CYrYr)
(CY,r3-Yr)
(C Y)
Vanderbilt
(R -22 +300 to
R -30.5)
-9 702
-29 105
40 446
Pelican Bay (R -30.5 to
R -37)
-9,933
3 6c5
DRAFT
Park Shore (R -43 +650 to R -54 *400)
1 ? 138
i3 414
49 174
- -Sawa :)n the 2005200£ FtC Template
-Baser on me available voteme seaward of me desagn neaclr dth oenwan +�
nAVG (2713 berm elevatr)Aj and the nearshore praftre c,=j,
'--- Rater: provtoed by 8f
Packet Page -1141-
6/23/2015 16.A.21.
DEP
Design
139
123
109
127
Beach Width (Feet)
131
120
115
122
Mon.
Standard
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
R -34 100
83
104
107
87
Wiggins Pass
110
100
102
89
100
95
R -17
82
103
98
79
94
97
94
87
82
104
94
68
R -18
96
92
79
82
92
90
90
78
96
90
R -37 100
94
R -19
99
92
Not Analyzed as Part of This Report - Shown for
Reference Only
83
95
81
R -20
95
R -38 -
111
88
115
104
104
101
77
109
93
81
R -21
R -39 -
101
95
104
88
80
111
94
107
97
107
93
R -22
100
107
107
120
112
112
124
118
108
NIA
120
112
R -23
100
102
123
129
916
118
113
122
116
110
117
114
R -24
100
116
132
138
119
116
135
124
125
99
114
112
R -25
100
95
135
136
112
112
124
112
113
93
108
106
R -26
100
109
147
148
123
123
135
121
123
106
139
125
R -27
100
83
124
117
98
96
97
89
91
91
125
109
R -28
100
97
138
123
112
108
112
111
99
88
120
119
R -29
100
88
143
120
105
108
107
106
98
93
123
119
R -30
100
110
141
131
109
125
113
108
117
110
125
123
a_ -)e ann 109 -132 121 117 136 131 124 117 102 -71j0 io1
R -32 100
110
139
123
109
127
126
131
120
115
122
129
R -33 100
96
107
96
99
108
111
113
105
95
103
105
R -34 100
83
104
107
87
93
110
100
102
89
100
95
R -35 100
82
103
98
79
94
97
94
87
82
104
94
R -36 100
84
96
92
79
82
92
90
90
78
96
90
R -37 100
102
92
99
92
98
95
83
95
85
93
95
R -38 -
111
88
115
104
104
101
77
109
93
101
104
R -39 -
101
95
104
88
80
111
94
107
97
107
110
R -40 -
73
77
81
76
73
107
118
83
111
98
125
R -41 -
111
110
112
138
173
99
131
80
158
157
193
Clam Pass
S. of Wiggins Pass
Avg. Beach Width
-
-
-
-
-
-
83
R -17 to R -21
Vanderbilt Beach
Avg. Beach Width
100
132
129
112
113
118
112
110
99
121
115
R -22 to R -31
Pelican Bay Beach
Avg. Beach Width
95
110
105
94
105
109
105
102
92
107
105
R -32 to R -37
N, of Clam Pass
Avg. Beach Width
99
92
103
101
107
105
105
95
115
116
133
R -38 to R -41
Packet Page -1142-
6/23/2015 16.A.21.
0
= u
U N Qj
4 � O
a�ocvr E
R Q J M N
C) o
w Lo rn
W
2 M J Z
w z zl O
� W w
(/7
C.1
O
O v o 2
N Q o� Z to
o
Li
oo g o u
,0>
4 i
z 'Q
N m = = W
o W R Z< j lal D
F-
�
L-Li �Wil° z o z w �v_�
_J
z w
J l.J
C,4 O _p GZU = ;; i � (_� O d O Co
'Q G a o � � � W `✓ .ii �. s
W � a _ � p ❑ `p �v�^i Tc�
r �
Ln
tt
G On
W �
O
Z W Cfh
C
I N O h 4 h O +ft
Cn vN .t, ..n373 on vN '1j "n373
Packet Page -1143-
6/23/2015 16.A.21.
- Provided by Atkins
-Ba.sed on the 2005,2006 Fili Template
-"eased on the available volume seaward of tr,e des,grn beach s,ndth betv✓eerz 13 NAVO (2013
berm elevation) and the nearshore profile closure.
-mates provided by CS!
Packet Page -1144-
BEACH WIDTH - VOLUME ANALYSIS
C
FDEP
Design
'2014 -02
2014 -12
2015 -04
"Fill
" "2015 -04
2015 -04
�-
Fill
W
Weighted
Diff.
Total
Mon.
Standard
Beach
Beach
v W
v1 Y
0> E g
Advance Advance
Effective
Erosion
3 -yr
2015.04
Diff.1
to MHW
Width
Width
Width
Distance
Volume
Volume Fill - 2015
Distance
Erosion
3-Yr Ero.
U g
CD a
rn a D
U
LI)
U e
4
U
U
in
i 2
(CY43 -Yr) (CY13 -Yr)
(Cr
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
- Provided by Atkins
-Ba.sed on the 2005,2006 Fili Template
-"eased on the available volume seaward of tr,e des,grn beach s,ndth betv✓eerz 13 NAVO (2013
berm elevation) and the nearshore profile closure.
-mates provided by CS!
Packet Page -1144-
BEACH WIDTH - VOLUME ANALYSIS
FDEP
Design
'2014 -02
2014 -12
2015 -04
"Fill
" "2015 -04
2015 -04
Total
Fill
3 -Year
Weighted
Diff.
Total
Mon.
Standard
Beach
Beach
Beach
Effective
Advance
Advance Advance
Effective
Erosion
3 -yr
2015.04
Diff.1
to MHW
Width
Width
Width
Distance
Volume
Volume Fill - 2015
Distance
Erosion
3-Yr Ero.
Reach
(Feet)
(Feet)
(Feet)
(Feet)
(Feet)
(CYIFt)
(Cr
(C Y)
(%)
(CY43 -Yr) (CY13 -Yr)
(Cr
(C 10
R -58A
100
140
71
52
517
-17.7
-9,157
3%
-2,248
- 11,405
R -58
100
124
144
125
790
5.7
4,484
4%
-3,433
1,051
R -59
100
117
111
122
1,033
5.3
5,446
6%
-4,491
955
R -60
100
109
126
107
1,081
1.8
1,958
6%
-4,700
-2,742
R -61
100
121
158
139
1.049
11.2
11,739
6%
- 4,559
7,180
T-62
100
105
136
145
1.015
13.0
13,234
5%
-4,410
6,824
R -63
100
116
67
106
967
1.8
1,727
5%
-4.204
-2,477
R -64
100
107
103
96
854
-1.4
-1,209
5%
-3,713
-4,921
T -65
100
125
122
120
804
7.2
5,778
4%
-3,495
2,283
R -66
100
129
119
126
813
9.3
7.578
4%
-3,533
4,045
R -67
100
174
171
172
805
26.8
21,552
Co
4%
-3,497
18,055
R -68
100
162
163
167
810
25.3
20.467
P°
4%
-3,521
16,946
T -69
100
149
149
156
805
229
16,430
N
4%
-3,498
14,932
R -70
100
140
124
136
800
13.5
10,789
4%
-3,479
7,309
R -71
100
144
129
147
803
19.8
15,869
4%
-3,491
12.378
R -72
100
155
158
172
808
29.6
23,901
4%
-3,510
20,391
R -73
100
153
158
186
814
35.9
29,192
4%
-3.537
25.655
R -74
100
144
145
176
803
32.0
25.664
4%
-3,490
22,174
R -75
100
116
100
147
795
24.8
19,700
4%
-3,456
16,244
R -76
100
113
116
94
799
-1.4
-1,107
1
4%
-3,475
- 4,582
R -77
100
116
120
111
782
-2.6
-21060
4%
-3,399
-5.459
1
R -78
100
100
97
103
659
0.8
540
4°i
-2.866
-2.326
R -79
100
105
97
99
276
-0.5
-132
1 °'0
-1,202
-1.334
R -80
F -81
R -82
R -83
R•8a
Norfn
o! u0rdon pass
U -85
T -86
R -87
F -88
F -89
" "Annual
'***3 -Year
Advance Adv. Less
Reach
Erosion
Erosion
Fill - 2015 3 -Yr Eros.
DRAFT
(CYIYr)
(CYI3 -Yr)
(Cr
(Cr
Naples
Beach (Doctors to R -79)
- -7,069
- 81,207
224,362
143.175
- Provided by Atkins
-Ba.sed on the 2005,2006 Fili Template
-"eased on the available volume seaward of tr,e des,grn beach s,ndth betv✓eerz 13 NAVO (2013
berm elevation) and the nearshore profile closure.
-mates provided by CS!
Packet Page -1144-