Loading...
Agenda 01/28/1997 R COLLZER COU'~I~ COM~ISSIONERS Bo~aD o? AGENDA Tuesday, January 28, 1997 9:00 a.m. NOTICEI AL5 PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM M~ST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAXING. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA ~fUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO T~E COUNTY HANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF T~E I~EETING AA~D WILh BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO A~PEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WIL~ NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND Ia~REFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD 0FTHE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES TH~ TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON W~ICH ~a~ APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. AL5 REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WIL~ BE LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS PE~ISSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE CKAIRMAR. ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMHISSIONERS' OFFICE LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 2. 3. 4. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF AhLEGIANCE APPRQVAb OF ~G~T~AAND CONSENT AGENDA ~PPROVAL OF MINI~TES January 7, 1997 - Regular meeting. PROCbAMATIONS AND SERVICE AWARDS A. Proclamations B. ~erv~ce Awards Sue Filson - Board of County Commissioners - 15 years Adelaide Dully - Solid Waste Administration - 10 years Raymond Barth - Colle6~ion-SCWWTP - $ years. C. ?resentations Betsy Perdichizzi, President of Marco Island His=orical Society, reimbursement of TDC funds for Key Marco Ca~ Exhibition. 6. APPROVA~ OF CLERK'S REPORT A. ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO RESERVES FOR CONTINGENCIES 1. General Fund (001) 2. Community Developmen= Fund (113) 3. Facilities C~ns=ruction Fund (301) 1 January 28, 1997 ?. pVBLIC PZTITIONS (1) A prelimtna~ revie~ of residential densi:y wi:bin the coastal urban area as recessed by ~he Soard of County Comm~ssioners as par~ of ~he Evaluation and Appraisal Repor~ (~). C. PUblIC E. ¢OUNTYMANAG£R (1) Amend Tourist Development Council Category C Grants. Guidelines for (2) Request Direction to Amend Category A Tourist Development Guidelines to Include Other Inlet and Inland Waterways not Currently Specified. (3) To Approve Funding Caxambas Pass Maintenance Dredging $380,600, T-Groin Construction in Capri/Big Marco Pass $363,200, and Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging $13,830. Category A Tourist Development Funds." (4} Consider Amending Ordinance 92-60 Relating to the L~vy of 2% Tourist Development Tax to Include the Reconstruction of a Public Fishing Pier. (5) Review of 5 Year Non-CEE Capital Improvement Plan. 9. ¢0VNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT (A) Resolution to adopt Collier County Streetscape Master Plan. 10. ~OA~/) QF COUNTY COMMIS$IONTRS A. Discussion of County Manager position. B. Appointment of members to the County Government Productivity Committee. C. Discussion regarding appointment of interim County Manager. 11. OTHER CONSTITL'TIONAL OFFICERS COMMENT ON GENERAL TOPICS PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE I{EARD IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING STAFF ITEMS 12. ~DVERTISED p~LIC HEARINGS o BCC A. COMPR~ENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS B. ~ONINGAMENDMENTS January 28, 1997 (1) Petition PUD-81-]O(1), Peter L. Breton representing Manor Care of Boynton Beach, Inc., requesting to amend the Lely Palms of Naples PUD document for the purposes of replacing fifty of the approved "future residential apartments" with 50 assisted living units with a common kitchen facility serving the 50 ALF units and to add an adult day care facility. The petitioner is also requesting to change the setback along the east property boundary from 30 feet to feet and to revise the master plan to reflect the changes for property located on the south side of Rattlesnake Hammock Road (C.R. 864) in Sec. 21, TS0S, R26E. (2) Petition PUD-96-14, Alan D. Reynolds, AICP, of Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., and George Varnadoe of Young, vanAssenderp and Varnadoe, P.A., representing Sunco Building Corporation, requesting a rezone from "A" and "A-ST" to PUD to be known as Island Walk Planned Unit Development for a maximum of 2,100 dwelling units and a fifteen acre town center for property located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road approximately one mile east of 1-75 in Sets. 33 and 34, T48S, R26E, consisting of 705 acres, more or less. (Companion to Agenda Item 12C.(2) (Continued from the meeting of 1/14/97) (3) Petition PUD-87-31(3), Community Development and Environmental Services Division requesting an amendment to the Gadaleta PUD, Ordinance No. 88-50, for the purpose of designating two acres 6~ the Gadaleta PUD as a commercial tract entitled to all of the C-2 uses for an area previously zoned C-2 prior to the amending of Ordinance 88-50. (1) An Ordinance providing funding for the Juvenile Assessment Center and Suspension Program through County Delinquency Prevention fines pursuant to Section 775.0833, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 96-382, Laws of Florida: providing for a mandatory cost of three dollars ($3.00) ~o be assessed against every person convicted of a violation of a criminal statute, a municipal or county ordinance, or a traffic offense in the County; providing for the court to assess the mandatory cost of $3.00 and the Clerk of the Circuit Court to collect the mandatory cost; providing for the collection of costs and disbursement of funds by the Clerk to the Sheriff; providing the responsibilities of the Sheriff; providing for conflict and severability; providing for inclusion in the Code of Laws and Ordinances; and providing an effective date. (2) Petition DRI-96-1, Alan R. Reynolds, AICP, of Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., representing Sunco Building Corporation requesting development approval of the "Island Walk" a mixed use development of regional impact containing a maximum of 2,100 mixed dwelling units, recreational, open space, and community service element, a "town center" providing retail, recreational and community sez~ices, and multipurpose green space located on Vanderbil= Beach Road (C.R. 862) between Interstate 75 and C.R. 951, more specifically including all of Section 33. T48S, R26E, and part of Section 34, T48S, 226£, consisting of 705~ acres. (Companion to Agenda Item 12B.{2) (Continued from the meeting of 1/14/97) 3 January 28, 1997 (3) A Resolution of the Board of County Com=£ssicners of Collier Coufity, Florida, Co correct a scrivener's error in the Woodlands DRI Development Order, Development Order 96-2, which amended Development Order 86-1, Sec:ion S, Transports:ion. relating :o addition of a roadway segment for moni:oring purposes and to correct legal participation by :he Department of Community Affairs in any no:ice of proposed change process. (4) Recommendation :ha: the Board of County Commissioners adopt an Ordinance providing for mandatory street numbering of all stz-uctures and the es:abl£shing of a grid pa:tern for street numbering. (S} Recommendation to Adopt a Resolu:ion Approving Amendments to :he Fiscal Year 1995-1996 Adopted Budge:. (6} Recommendation to Adopt a Resolution Approving Amendments :o :he Fiscal Year 1996-1997 Adopted Budge:. (7} Recommends:ion that the Board of Coun:y Commissioners adopt an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 89-11, the Beach and Wa:er Safe:y and Vessel Control Ordinance. (8) The Collier Coun:y false alarm ordinance; providing deflni:ions~ providing responsibility for security alarm systems and false alarms; required response~ providing for warning or cite:ion of raise"alarm viola:ions~ providing for false alarm repot: fo.-ms and corrective ac:ion; providing for false alarm fines~ excep:ions~ providing enforcement and penalty provisions~ providing for conflic: and severabili:y; providing for inclusion in :he code of laws and ordlnances~ and providing an effective date. (9} Petition SNR-96-10, requesting a street name change from Rifle Range Road to The Lord's way which s:ree: is located east of C.R. 9S1 in Sec. 14, TSOS, R26E. 13. ~QARD OF ZONING APPEALS A. ADV~RTZ~ED PUBhIC HEARINGS (1) Petition V-96-28, John Grissom of Dia=omd Pool Construction, Inc., representing Landmark Communities, requesting a 1.94 foot variance from the required S fooC rear setback to 3.06 fee: for property located at 3810 Gro:on Court0 fur:her described as Lo: 189, Queens Park a: Lago Verde. ~hase 7, in Sec. 18, 'TSOS° R26E. (Continued mee:ing of 2/2S/9~) B. OTHER 14. ~QA~D OF COD~ COM2~ISSIONERS' CO~2<UNICATION$ 15. ~TAFF'$ COH~NICATIONS WORKSHOP[ Economic Diversification Program, Phase II presented by Council of Economic Advieors. 16. CO~S~ & 4 January 28, 1997 Ail matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken hy one motion without separate discussion of each item. X£ discussion is desired by a me--~er of the Board, that £tem(a) will he removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. A. COM]~'~NITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (11 Petition AV-96-036, recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of 'Northshore Lake Villas Replat' and approve the vacation of the recorded plat of "Northshore Lake Villas'. (2) Recommendation to approve the final plat of "riddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek Village". (3) This item deleted. (4) Water and sewer facilities acceptance for Pelican Marsh, Unit Eight, Phase One. (5) Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of 'Tarpon Cove'. s. P~ (1) Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Seryices Agreement with Mumiston & Moore Engineers for work associated with the Big Marco and Capri Pass Inlet Management Plan. (2] Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Resolution and Declaration of Easement concerning the Max A. Masse, Jr. Comnunity Park located on Golden Gate Boulevard. (3) Approve a Budget Amendment recognizing carry forward amounts from FY 1996 for Countywide ¢~P Projects in Fund ~01. {4) Approve Amendment No. ~ to Professional Agreement for engineering services related to improvements a= the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. C. RV {1) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve a request for funding for the construction of a floating dock system to be located at =he Caxambas launch facility. '.' .. (2) Recommendation that the Board of County Co~nissioners approve the budget amendment recognizing carry forward within Fund 1]0 Golden Gate Community Center. {]) Recommendation that the Board of Collier County Commissioners confirm the selection of Dr. Charles Konigsberg as the new Collier County Public Health Department Director. D. U V (1] Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve a First Amendment to Le~se Agreement between Collier County and Roger Carvallo concerning =he Finance Department office space. January 28, 1997 Reco~mendation to declare County-owned property as surplus and accept the offers received for the sale of surplus terminals, keyboards, and microfilm equipment under Bid #S96-2627. (3) Reco~mendation ~o approve a ¢on~ract amendment with PCA Solutions, Inc. to provide runout group health insurance claims adjusting services. (4) Recommendation to obtain Board examination and approval of the sufficiency of bonds of County Officers. (1) Budget Amendment Report. [1] ~1~--~---~: NEED MOTION authorizing the Chairman to sign Satisfaction of Lien for Services of the Public Defender for Case Nos. 96-8292-~'~ 96'1708-CFA, 90-5736'TM, 82-227-MI, 90-1884 -CFA 96-7256'MMA, 95-5706-M~A, 96-6026'M~A, 96-12¢0-CFA 96-4464-F24A, 94-1437'CFA, 96-8808-f~4A, 96- 9035'~A 96' 8392'fL'~A, 96-8752'M~A, 96,4849'~/~A, 95-1007-CFA 96'4641'~A, 96-258-CFA, 96'901'CFA, 96'7231-~2~ 9 S-2243 'CFA, 95 ° 1280-MMA, 96 - 759-CJA. 96 -7326 -~4A 96-8108-f~4A, 96°8906-MMA, 96'8935°~'"~A. 96- 5441'.%~A, 90' 1611-CFA, 90'1611'CFA, 90'1611'CFA, 90-1611-CFA. RECOMHEND APPROVAL. [2] -' w ". Januar~ 28, 1997 AGENDA CHANTS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETIN(~ JANUARY 28, 1997 ADDs ITEM 8(A) (2) - WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE FOR INDIAN WELLS GOLF VILLAS (STAFF'S REQUEST). ADDs ITEM 8(B)(1) - APPROVE A CHANGE ORDER TO WORK ORDER #ABB-FT-96-7 WITH AGNOLI, BARBER AND BRUNDAGE, INC. FOR CLAM PASS MAINTENANCE DREDGING. (STAFF'S REQUEST). ADDs ITEM 10(D) - DISCUSSION OF LAKE TRAFFORD TASK FORCE ASSISTANCE. (STAFF'S REQUEST). CONTINUE ITEM 12(C)(7) TO 2/11/97 MEETING - RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BCC ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-11 THE BEACH AND WATER SAFETY AND VESSEL CONTROL ORDINANCE (STAFF'S REQUEST). BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Janua~ 28,1997 CLERK'S REPORT 6A. Analysis of Changes to Reserves for Contingencies General Fund (001) for FY 98/97 Community Development Fund (113) for 96/97 Facilities Construction Fund (301) for FY 98/97 ao., ~ JAN 2 8 1997 ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO GENERAL FUND (001) RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES Fo~ the meeting date of January 28, 1997 F~ 1996-97 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES: Original Budget 10/01/96 Curt'ertl Balance 1/16/97 (Reductions) or increases as explained below B.A. Date Request 11.27.66 12-11-96 12-11-96 12-31-96 1-16-97 EXPLANATION OF REDUCTIONS Explanation 48 To repair the bottoms of the activity and plunge pool. 64 To pay Ut~fity expenses for Immokalee Ch~3d Care Center 68 To repair the Central Library Ch[fief 92 Reduce transfer to Road and Bridge due to additional revenue received fro roadway sweeping and mowing. 1 I0 To execute the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement agreement and releases with plantiffs no longer employed by EMS. 4,675,900 4,600,652 (7_5.~) (Reduction)/ Increase (t 6,500.00) (11,000.00) (14,475~00) (42,770.00) Amendments amounting to less than $10,000 each: (No.: 29, 17. 68, 69, 51,) (31,803) Total Reductions JAN 2 8 1997 ii I I II I III1~ I I III I llll III I IIII II - ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND (1 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES For the meeting of January 28. 1997 FY' 1995-97 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES: Odginal Budget 10/01/96 Current Balance 1/17/97 (Reductions) or increases as explained below Date Request EXPLANATION OF REDUCTIONS Explanation 277.400 277,400 0 (Reduction)/ Increase Total Reductions 0 N ~edmin~o~ 113_~I JAN 2 8 9.0,°7 ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION FUND (301} RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES For the meeting date of January 28, 1997 FY 1996-97 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES: Original Budget 10/01/96 Current Balance 1117/97 (Reduct.~ons) or increases as explained below Dale Recj.~est 11-13-96 EXPLANATION OF REDUCTIONS Exp~anatlon Amendments amounting to Jess than $10,000 each: (No.: 25) $ 294.400.00 292 199.00 {Reduction)/ Increase S (2.201) Total reductions JAN 2 8 1997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY WITHIN THE COASTAL URBAN AREA AS REQUESTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AS PART OF THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR). OBJECTIVE: To review the issue of residential density within the Coastal Urban Area as identified in the EAR and to seek direction from the Board of County Commissioners on any EAR based amendments of the Comprehensive Plan with regard to density. CONSIDERATIONS: The Board of County Commissioners, as part of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR), directed staff to review residential density within the Urban Area. This review provides dwelling units estimates at buildout for the Coastal Urban Area, Immokalee and Golden Gate Estates, it does not include dwelling un[ts for property zoned agricultural or conservation which is located east of the Urban Boundary. This review identifies the density of the Urban Area based on the completion of the zoning reevaluation program and the existing zoning, including approved Planned Unit Developments and Developments of Regional Impact. The vacant Agricultural property was evaluated based on the existing Comprehensive Plan and through the Urban Area Buildout Study. The final portion of this report provides options regarding a!ternatives to the existing residential density pattern. Zoning Reevaluation Program the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1989, Policy 3.1 k of the Future Land Use Element contained a requirement that a Zoning Reevaluation Program be conducted to bring zoning that was inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan into compliance. The Zoning Reevaluation Program did not address property that was improved, had vested dghts or would be incompatible if zoned to the density permissible by the adopted Plan. The results of this 2 % year effort are listed below: · Density reduction - 6,397 dwelling units · Commercial land rezoned to non-commercial uses - 215 acres · Industrial land rezoned to non-industrial uses - 0.89 acres · Travel Trailer Recreation Vehicle Campground land rezoned - 632 acres Properties were granted exemptions (754 acres) and exceptions (450 acres) as provided for in the Zoning Reevaluation Ordinance. Approximately 72 acres were considered to be consistent under the 'Commercial under Criteria" provision. The impact of Zoning Reevaluation was limited. Of the 2,703 commercial acres outside of Activity Centers, 215 were rezoned, 572 acres were granted an exemption or exception and permitted to retain commercial zoning. Improved property, which has a higher density or intensity than permitted under the current Comprehensive is permitted to retain and rebuild in accordance with that zoning district. The Map series (FLUE Map 9-13), Existing Zoning Consistent by Policy, identifies those properties that have a higher density or intensity than the Comprehensive Plan would permit but are considered consistent because they are improved, have vested rights, or have been granted an exception or exemption under the Zoning Reevaluation Program (Policies 5.9, 5.10 and 5.11 of the Future Land Use Element). AGEN D&I,T~M - 'IJAN 2 8 1997 Planned Unit Developments/Developments of Reglonal Impact There are approximately 234 Planned Units Developments (PUD's) approved on 41,265 acres. The breakdown on how the land uses are distributed and the amount of existing development is as follows: Developed Approved Acres Square feet Acres Square Feet Commercial 242 3,979,152 2,169 14,720,008 Industrial 57 172,460 1,118 4,430,030 Golf Course 828 holes 6,820 acres Conservation 20,129 acres Residential Developed Dwelling Units: Single Family 10,592 Multi-Family 23,615 Hotel/Motel/RV 2,586 ACLF/Hospital 245 37,038 (32%) Total Dwelling Units: 114,931 Table 1 identifies approved PUD's and provides the breakdown by land use type: commercial, industrial, residential units, Adult Congregate Living Facilities, Hotel/Motel units, Recreation Vehicle units, golf course, conservation. Tables 2 provides a listing of PUD's that have a density at or below 4.31 units per acre. There are approximately 89 PUD's on 34,132 acres with a total of 88,571 units which are at or below a gross density 4.31 units per acre. Table 3 lists those PUD's with a density level above 4.31 units per acre There are 83 PUD's on 4,183 acres with the total number of dwelling units 26,386 with a gross density between 4.53 and 23.44 per acre. Within all the PUD's, 83% of the acreage and 77% of the dwelling units are approved for a gross density of 4 units per acre and below. Table 4 proved a listing of the 52 PUD's that have been completed and provides a breakdown by type of land use and the gross density. Map I is a general location map of the PUD's throughout Collier County. There are 21 Developments of Regional Impact (DRI's) approved which include the following land use types: 1,103 commercial acres, 287 industrial acres, and 60,641 dwelling units on 19,313 acres. Table 5 provides a specific listing of the land use type along with a locations map (Map 2 ). All of the DRI's, except for Cedar Bay Marina which is zoned C-5, are also zoned PUD. Development Potential on Agricultural Lands within the Urban Area There are approximately, 18,800 acres of land zoned Agricultural within the Urban Area (see Map 3). Under the current Plan, which are eligible to request the base density under the Density Rating System, without any density bonus provisions. It should be noted that these are maximum densities which may not be achieved on all properties and would be subject to zoning approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2 AGENDA.LT£1d No. ~ JAN 2 8 1997 Agricultural Density Total Acreage Per Acre Dwelling Units West of Airport Rd. * East of Airport Rd. Urban Residential Fdnge 4,154 3 12,463 10,485 4 41,942 4,160 1.5 6,240 18,799 60,645 'Traffic Congestion Area The maximt~m base density could be modified, if appropriate, by the Density Bonus Provisions which could add to the base density. · Affordable housing - 8 units per acre · Residential infill - 3 units per acre · Within Density Band - 3 units per acre · Within Activity Centers - 16 units per acre · Roadway access - 2 arterials or collectors - 1 unit per acre · Transfer of Development Rights - 10% to 20% above district Decrease in Density: · Interconnection - (proposed for deletion in EAR) I unit per acre Also within the Coastal Urban Area there are 1,217 acres of land zoned Estates (E) which permits one dwelling unit per 2 ¼ acres. These properties are not part of the Golden Gate Estates Subdivision and are located on Map 3. The current Plan permits those properties to be eligible to request residential densities, consistent with the density rating system. Buildout Analysis The purpose of the Urban Area Buildout Study is to assist in the development of a long range 'vision" of Naples Urban Area with a specific focus on the infrastructure improvements needed to accommodate the potential growth. An important aspect in the development of this Study was public participation. During the data compilation stage staff solicited input from the following group presentations including the Economic Development Council, Contractors and Builders Industry Association, Chamber of Commerce, Greater Naples Civic Association, Presidents Council, Collier County Planning Commission and included as part of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Phase I of the Study was completed in March, 1994 and provided an estimate of buildout population for the Coastal Urban Area. This estimate included those properties that had retained their development potential after zoning reevaluation, existing zoning and agricultural property developed at the base density of the Comprehensive Plan. These estimates were conservative and did not estimate the 'worst case" scenario. Phase I estimated that the buildout of the Coastal Urban Area could accommodate approximately 275,607 dwelling units and a population of 458,001. If the Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) medium range population estimate are realized this population could be reached in the time frame between 2019 to 2046. AG£NDA JT£1~, 3 JAN 2 8 1997 Phase II of the Buildout Study represents an attempt to identify the infrastructure needs for the buildout population. Table 6 contains a list of services necessary to support the buildout population of 458,000. These estimates were provided by the service agencies and represent their estimate of necessary infrastructure to serve that population. The Urban Area Buildout Study identified approximately 16,000 vacant acres zoned agricultural with a potential of 58,000 dwelling units. The Urban Area Buildout Study did not analyze if the needed infrastructure could physically be provided or if it was financially feasible. The 2020 Financially Feasible Plan identified a road network that could potentially support 246,494 dwelling units and a population of 393,100. VVhat has not been thoroughly analyzed is based on the level of development currently approved and permitted in the Comprehensive Plan can the necessary infrastructure be provided long term to support that level of development. The Capital Improvements Element provides a five year schedule of capital improvements to support development. The Annual Update and Inventor,./Report identifies any deficiencies and provides recommendations for funding to meet the adopted level of services to ensure concurrency. The Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) contains an estimate of the potential buildout of both the Golden Gate Estates Subdivision and the Irnmokalee Community. There are approximately 99,812 acres of land zoned within the Golden Gate Estates Subdivision. For purposes of this report those Estates parcels within the Urban Area are included in the Urban Area Buildout Study. An estimate for buildout of the Southern Golden Gate Estates was not included because that area is currently proposed for purchase by the State of Florida. There are approximately 55,640 acres of land zoned estates outside of the Urban Area and north of Alligator Alley (I-75). At buildout this area could contain 18,547 dwelling units. The Immokalee Urban Area contain approximately 17,542 acres and at buildout could accommodate 38,798 dwelling units. Acreage Buildout Estimate of Dwelling Units Coastal Urban Area Golden Gate Estates Immokalee Urban Area 80,000 275,607 55,640 18,547 17,542 38,798 153,182 332,952 During the preparation of the EAR report an analysis was prepared on the population estimates and projections for Collier County. When the Comprehensive Plan was adopted the County requested and received approval to use the high range BEBR estimates because during the 1980's the annual growth rate was about 6% per year. In reviewing the actual population growth from 1986 to 1996 it has been determined that the rate of growth has decreased to 4%, which is closer to the medium range BEBR population estimates. Based on this information in July, 1996 the Board of County Commissioners approved a new methodology for population projections which utilizes the high range BEBR growth rate in the first 5 years and then uses the medium range BEBR growth rate until the year 2020. Graph 1 illustrates the BEBR Iow, medium and high range population estimates to the year 2020. Scenario one represents the population methodology adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE/DENSITY RANGE MAP The final Map Series is an analysis of the land uses as approved under the current zoning identify residential uses by density range; commercial uses; industrial uses; golf course, p; conservation areas; community facilities/churches/schools, and agriculture. The Activity C · The Mao~ rks, AG£N T JAN g 8 1997 are also shown. Upon review of the map series it is apparent that a majority of the property is zoned for residential at a density between 2-4 units per acre. There is limited agricultural land available within the Urban Area; the vast majority of which is located at the eastern end of the Urban Area boundary along CR 951. This Map Series identifies the propedies which could request building permits for development based on their zoning district. The rate of development of these properties depends, in part, on the annual population growth. Table 7 illustrates the Building Permit Data, by building type, for the years 1991 to 1996. Over the last 6 years, residential permits issued have averaged 4,050 permits per year. The lower number of residential permits were issued in 1991 and 1993, with the highest number issued in 1996. CONCLUSIONS: The following conclusions are provided from the data above. · FLUE map series (9-13) identify those properties that have a higher density or intensity than the current Plan would permit because of improved property, and properties granted exceptions and exemptions under the Zoning Reevaluation Program. · There are 114,931 dwelling units in approved PUD's, of which 32% of the units are developed. · Within PUD's, 83% of the acreage and 77% of the dwelling units in projects that are less than 4 units per gross acre. · There are approximately 18,799 vacant acres zoned agricultural which may accommodate 60,645 dwelling units at the maximum base density, without utilizing any of the bonus density provisions. · The Urban Area Buildout Study estimated the buildout population of the Urban Area to be 458,000 and 275, 607 dwelling units. Buildout could occur between 2019 to 2046 depending on the annual growth rate. ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives suggested are an attempt to identify potential options that may be available and do not represent an exhaustive list. The feasibility of each alternative would have to be analyzed in more detail to determine the impacts and overall consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. · Maintain the status quo and keep the Future Land Use Element regarding residential density the same. · Reduce the size of the Urban Area. This would reduce the number of dwelling units from the potential Urban Area intensities of 3 and 4 units per gross acre to 1 unit per 5acres. For each section of land deleted from the Urban Area the density would be decreased from 1920-2560 dwelling units to 128 dwelling units. · Reduce the maximum base density on Agriculturally zoned property east of Airport Road from 4 units per gross acre to Urban Residential Fringe Area which allows one unit per 1.5 acres. This has the potential to affect 10,485 acres of land which would reduce the number of dwelling units from a total of 41,942 to 15,728 dwelling units. · Delete the Density Bonus Provisions and only allow increased density by transferring density from another parcel with available units. · Reduce the maximum base density from 4 to 3 units per gross acre. This would affect10.485 acres with the potential to reduce the number of dwelling units from 41,942 to 31,455. · Under the 'sunset" provision of the Land Development Code, reduce density (m existing ~ that has not commenced construction. This alternative would have to be researched in orde~ to ide,-~y the reduction in the potential number of dwelling units. · Promote increased density within Mixed Use Activity Centers. This could be the overall base density and using a system of density transfer to the 5 Promote increased density on infill propedies to ensure compatibility. On smaller infill properties that would have difficulty in developing at 3 or 4 units per gross acre a system of density averaging with surrounding properties could be investigated. FISCAL IMPACT: Should density and/or zoning be altered on any property potential litigation under the Bert J. Harris, Jr. Private Property Protection Act may occur (Section 70.001, Florida Statutes). The Act provides: When a specific action of a local government entity has inordinately burdened an existing use of real property .... the property owner of that real property is entitled to relief, which may include compensation for the actual loss to the fair market value of the real property caused by the action of the government as provided in this section. There has been limited case law to interpret this legislation. Attachment I is a memorandum from Marjorie Student, Assistant County Attorney, which outlines some of the concerns. Full legal ramifications should be analyzed by lhe County Attorney's Office. Additionally, potential positive and negative consequences of density reduction may be realized. These impacts which may affect, but are not limited to, cost of land, housing costs and the tax base would be analyzed as part of any proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: A review of any proposed amendment is required to ensure internal consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners provide direction to staff on any EAR based amendments to the Future Land Use Element regarding residential density. Prepared By: ' Bart~ara A. Cacchione, AICP Comprehensive Planning Manager ___Ee.y_i_e. wed_B y: ~ ~ Donald W. Amold, AICP Planning Services Director ~ DATE:~ Community Development & Environmental Services Division 6 'JAN 2 8 1997 PI. ~ FLUE Map Series (9-13) Existing Zoning Consistent by Policy; Map 1, Location Map of Planned Unit Developments$ Map 3, Agricultural and Estates Zoning in the Urban Area and the Existing Zoning/Land Use/Density Range Map Series are 11" x 17" color maps that can not be reproduced for the agenda packet. They will be provided under separate cover to the Board of County Commissioners and are available to the public in the Comprehensive Planning Section of the Planning Services Department, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, 643-8400. ,.lAN ,g 8 1997 1997 i I' i~ I :.JAN g 8 1997 2 8 1997 o! 'JAN 2, 8 1997 ~ '-~ 0 '~ 0 (1) t~? 2 DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT STAFF ~ MAP WESTERN COLLIER COUNTY RANCE$ 25.26 AND 27 ~aple~ Airport Operztions p~r Ytsr ! 2S.000 ~20.000 Trm~l~r~aflon for the Disadvantaged ,MIJes or S~rvlce per Year ~50.000 !.900.000 Tr~nsportallon O[jglrway Travel) VcMcle ,Miles of Tntvtl per Day 3,904,39~ 8,?15,R90 Tr=anZlMr~tton (Tuel Consumed) Fuel Consumed per Day 216,911 gal 484,216 gal Flr~ & Rescue CI~' of Nap!es Stations / %hfclrs 3 /2S 3 / 29 Golden Cafe Sraflon~ / Vehicles 21 ! 3 4 / 22 ,Marco Island Slations / VeMc]es I / ] 1 I / I? Norlh .~'aples StatJon~ / YehJcles 4 / ! 7 F~=~t .%'s pies Scafions / VehJcles .3120 9; 43 l~le of Capri St'tions / Vehicles ! 14 1110 · l~merten.'c7 ~%~cdJctl ScrMces Ground / Air Ambulances · I ? / 1 * 5 ] / 2 Emergency MaAs ge'merle Shelter Spate (persons.) 29,700 persons . SOlid %VanCe (Generation) Tons per Year 171,66S tons 413~03 tons Solid '~Vastt (Land) Acres Consumed per Year 9 22 Parks Commurtlty Num bet of Sites I Acres 141392 24 / 736 Re gJonal Number of Sifts I Acru 16 / 700 20 / School Site (Joint Use) Number of ~ / Acres J0 / 50 24 / 600 LJbrat~ Facilities / Books ? / 246,00~ 26 / ?00,69S Schoots EJtmentm'y School Sites / Acr~ $ 8 / 30~ 36 / .%Ud~He School Si~s /Acres 6 / 184 1 ! / 334 JUgh School Sites IAcr~ 4 / 177 7/357 Voc~tJon~1 School Sites / Acru ! 13S 2 / Commmdty Cohere Enr~lLmen! / Acru S,300 / SO L~w EAforcmnen( CIf7 of Naples '.' FKflMes I Vehicles liS.3 1/60 Buildout Study Phase 1I - ' ·_ -- POPULATION (Thousands) ~.- "JAN 2 8 1997 'JAN :) 8 1997 Attachment 1 memorandum Date: To: Vince Cautero, Admimstrator Community. Development & Environmental Services Division F rom~" Ma~or~e .X,L Student Assistant Count' Attorney Adjustment of.~lowable Densities in the Urban Area PJ..S No. CMD96042601 You have asked in your memorandum dated April 24, 1996 what legal impediments the County may have by lowering allowable densities in the urban area on property that is not vested. Specifically, the Bert .I. Harris, .Ir. Private Property Rights Protection Act would likely apply. See Section 70.001, Florida Statutes attached. The Act provides: When a specific action ora local goverrunental entity has inordinately burdened an existing u~ of reaJ property..., the property owner of that real property is entitled to relief, which may include compensation for the actual loss to the fair market value of the real property caused by the action ofthe government as provided in this section. The term "action ora governmental entity" m~ans a specific action ora governmental entity which affects the real property, excluding action on an application or permit. ' Additionally, the term "inordinate burden" is defined as follows: That an ac'don of one or more governmental entities has directly restricted or limited the use of real property such that the property owner is permanently unable to attain the reasonable, investment - backed expectation for the existing use of the real property.., with respect to the property as whole, or that the properly owner is left with existing uses that are unreasonable such that the property owner bears permanently a disproportionant share ora burden imposed for the good of the public, which in ffirneas should be borne by the public at large. Temporary impacts to land such as a building moratorium are not an inordinate burden. No. ~ :JAN 2 8 1997 ._. Pgo ~ August 20, 1996 Vincent A. Cautero Adj. Allowable Densities Urban Area RLS No. CMC96042601 Page 2 The term "existing use" means an actual present use or activity on the land, notwithstanding periods or'inactivity normally associated with or incidental to the activity. An existing use may also mean such reasonably foreseeable, non-speculative land uses which are suitable for the subject real property, compatible wlth adjacent land uses and which have created an existing lair market value in the property greater than the lair market value of the actual, present use or activity on the real property. So long as the existing requested use is not speculative, is suitable for the property, is compatible with adjacent land uses, and can be justified by an appraisal the landowner should come under the protection or'The Act. Should property in the urban area that is already zoned for a residential use with a higher density than that in a proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) having the effect ofredudng density, the Property Rights Act could be triggered. Where property is still zoned agriculture, even though entitled to a residential zoning designation with a density higher than the proposed density, there should be less o£a problem. It could be argued that the right to a future use of the property at a higher density even though not presently zoned that way could trigger The Act. However, this is less likely. An evaluation of each parcel to be down2oned would be necessary in order to determine the County's exposure pursuant to Section 70.001 et seq. Florida Statutes. There may be other legal impediments as well. For example, any amendment to the GMP reducing density requires a police power justification as well as the need for studies to justify same. Mere whim of'the public is not sut'ficient. Issues ofcompatibUity with adjacent land uses also arise. There could also be an argument that reduction in density consistent with "large lot" zoning which has been held to be discriminatory and in violation of'equal protection. There also may be a problem in the delivery of'affordable housing. Section 163.3177(6)(0 Florida Statutes mandates that the County provide affordable housing. Note, however, that each of these scenarios should be evaluated on a case by case basis. If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. MMSIew h:~J~ublic'mms~n',cmos'cautcro adjustmenls to a~sitles urt~n area Attachment -- AGE~t~ JAN 8 1997 / RELIEF FROM BURDENS ON REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Ch. 7[ ;s tS ¢c) During lhe 180-day-notice period, unless exiended by agreement of lhe parties, the governmental enlity shall make a written seltlement offer 1o effectuate: 1. An adjustment of land development or permit standards or other provisions controlling the develop- ment or use of land. 2. Increases of modifications in the density, inten. sity, or use of areas of development. 3. The transfer of developmental rights. 4. Land swaps of exchanges. 5. Mitigation, including payments in lieu of onsite mitigation. 6. Location on the least sensitive portion of the property. 7. Conditioning the amount of development or use permitted. 8. A requirement that issues be addressed on a more comprehensive basis lhan a single proposed use or development. 9. Issuance of the development order, a variance, special exception, or other exlraordinary relief. 10. Purchase of the real property, or an interest therein, by an appropriate governmental entity. 11. No changes to the action of the governmental entity. If the property owner accepts the setllement offer, the governmental entity may implement the settlement offer by appropriate development agreement; by issuing a variance, special exception, or olher extraordinary relief; or by other appropriate method, subject to paragraph (d). (d)l. Whenever a governmental entity enters into a settlement agreement under Ibis section which would have t,'~e effect of a modification, variance, or a special exception to the application of a rule, regulation, or ordi. nance as it would otherwise apply to the subject real properly, the relief granted shaft protect the public inter. est served by the regulations at issue and be the appro. priate relief necessary to prevent the governmental reg. u[atory effort from inordinately burdening the real prop. erty. 2. Whenever a governmental entity enters into a settlement agreement under this section which would have the effect of conlravening the application of a stat- ute as it would otherwise apply to the subject real prop- erty, the governmental entity and the property owner shall jointly file an action in the circuit court where the real property is located for approval of the settlement agreement by the court to ensure that the relief granted protects the public interest served by the statute at issue and is the appropriate relief necessary to prevent the governmental regulatory effort from inordinately bur- dening Ihe real property. (SXa) During the 180-day-notice period, unless a settlement offer is accepted by the property owner, each of Ihe governmental entities provided notice pursu. ant lo paragraph (4Xa) shall issue a written ripeness decision identifying the allowable uses to which the sub- ject property may be put. The failure of the governmen. Iai entity Io issue a written ripeness decision during lhe lBO-day-notice period shall be deemed to ripen the prior action of the governmental entity, and shall operate as a ripeness decision that has been rejected by lh~ property owner. The ripeness decision, as a mailer law, conslitutes lhe last prerequisite Io judicial review, and the matter shall be deemed ripe or final for lhe put- poses of Ihe judicial proceeding created by this sec~j~ notwithstanding the availabilily of other administr~ remedies. (b) If lhe property owner rejects the settlement offer and the ripeness decision of the governmental entity or enlilies, the property owner may file a claim for compen. salton in the circuit court, a copy of which shall be served contemporaneously on lhe head of each ot the governmental entities lhal made a settlement offer and a ripeness decision that was rejected by lhe property owner. Aclions under lhis section shall be brought only in lhe county where the real property is located. (6Xa) The circuit court shall determine whether an existing use of the real property or a vesled righl to a specific use of the real property existed and. if so. whether, considering the selllement offer and ripeness decision, Ihe governmental entity or entities have ino(di. nalely burdened lhe real property. If the actions of more than one governmental entity, considering any seltle. merit offers and ripeness decisions, are responsible fo( Ihe action that imposed the inordinale burden on lhe real property of the property owner, lhe court shall deter. mine the percenlage of responsibility each such govern. mental entity bears with respect lo the inordinate bur- den. A governmental entity may take an interlocutory appeal of the court's delerminalion that the action o! the governmental entity has resulled in an inordinate bur- den. An interlocutory appeal does nol automatically stay the proceedings; however, the court may stay Ihe,Bl~, ceedings during the pendency of the interlock,t appeal. If lhe governmental entity does nol prevail !nterlocutory appeal, the court shall award lo the prevail- lng property owner the costs and a reasonable atlorney fee incurred by the property owner in the interlocutory appeal. (b) Following its determinalion of lhe percentage ol responsibility of each governmental entity, and following the resolution of any interlocutory appeal, lhe court shall impanel a jury to determine Ihe lotal amount of compen. salton to lhe property owner for the loss in value due to lhe inordinate burden lo the real properly. The award of compensation shall be determined by calculating lhe difference in the fair markel value of the real property. as it existed at the time of the governmental action al issue, as though the owner had lhe ability to attain Ihe reasonable investment-backed expectation or was not left with uses that are unreasonable, whichever the case may be, and the fair market value of lhe real property, as it existed at the time of the governmental action at issue, as inordinately burdened, considering the settle. merit offer together with the ripeness decision, of the governmental enlily or entities. In determining the award of compensation, consideralion may not be given Io business damages relative to any development, activity. or use that the action of the governmental entity or enli- t!es, considering the settlement offer togelher with Ihe r~peness decision has ~ The award of compen,. award of prejudgment nterest irom--"-J'J~'-'~le the .JAN 2 8 1997 · ' Ch. 70 RELIEF FROM BURDENS ON REAL PROPERTY RIGHTS F.S. 1.~9~ was presented to the governmental entity or entities as provided in subsection (4). (c)1. In any action filed pursuant to this section, the property owner is entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney tees incurred by the property owner, from the governmental entity or entities, according to their proportionate share as determined by the court, from the date of the filing of the circuit court action, if the property owner prevails in the action and the court determines that the settlement offer, including the ripe. ness decision, ot the governmental entity or entities did not constitute a bona fide offer to the property owner which reasonably would have resolved the claim, based upon the knowledge available to the governmental entity or entities and the property owner during the 180-- day-notice period. 2. m any action filed pursuant to this section, the governmental entity or entities are entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred by the gov- ernmental entity or entities from the date of the filing of the circuit court action, if the governmental entity or anti. ties prevail in the action and the court determines that the property owner did not accept a bona fide settle. merit offer, including the ripeness decision, which rea. sonably would have resolved the claim fairly to the prop- erty owner if the settlement offer had been accepted by the property owner, based upon the knowledge avail. able to the governmental entity or entities and the prop- erty owner during the 180-day-notice period. 3. The determination of total reasonable costs and attorney fees pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the court and not by the jury. Any proposed settle. ment offer or any proposed ripeness decision, except for the fine. I written settlement offer or the final written ripe- ness decision, and any negotiations or rejections in regard to the formulation either of the settlement offer or the ripeness decision, are inadmissible in the subse- quent proceeding established by this section except for the purposes of the determination pursuant to this para- graph. (d) Within 15 days after the execution of any settle- ment pursuant to this section, or the issuance of any judgment pursuant to this section, the governmental entity shall provide a copy of the settlement or judgment to the Department of Legal Affairs. (7)fa) The circuit court may enter any orders neces- sary to effectuate the purposes of this section and to make final determinations to effectuate relief available under this section. (b) An award or payment of compensation pursuant to this section shall operate to grant to and vest in any governmental entity by whom compensation is paid the right, title, and interest in rights of use for which the com- pensation has been paid, which rights may become transferable development rights to be held, sold, ~ oth- er,vise disposed of by the governmental entity. When there is an award of compensation, the court shall deter. mine the form and the recipient of the right, title, and interest, as well as the terms of their acquisition. (8) This section does not supplant methods agreed to by the parties and lawfully available for arbitration, mediation, or other forms of alternative dispute resolu- tion, and governmental entities are encouraged to utilize such methods Io augment or facilitate the processes and actions contemplated by this section. (9) This section provides a cause of action for gov. ernmental actions that may pot rise to the level of a tak. lng under the State Constitution or the United States Constitution. This section may not necessarily be con. strued under Ihe case law regarding takings if the gov. ernmental action does not rise to the level of a taking. The provisions of Ihis section are cumulative, and do not abrogate any other remedy lawful'fy available, including any remedy lawfully available for governmental actions that rise to the level of a taking. However, a governmen. lal entity shall not be liable for compensation for an action of a governmental entity applicable to, or for the loss in value to, a subject real property more than once. (10) This section does not apply lo any actions taken by a governmental entity which relate to the operation, maintenance, or expansion ol transportation facilities, and this section does not affect existing law regarding eminent domain relating to transportation. (11) A cause of action may not be commenced under this section if the claim is presented more than 1 year after a law or regulation is first applied by the govern. mental entity to the property at issue. If an owner seeks relief from the governmental action through lawfully available administrative or judicial proceedings, lhe time for bringing an action under this section is tolled until the conclusion of such proceedings. (12) No cause of action exists under this section as to the application of any law enacted on or before May 11, 1995, or as to the application of any rule, regulatioa, or ordinance adopted, or formally noticed for adoption. on or before that date. A subsequent amendment to any such law, rule, regulation, or ordinance gives rise Io a cause of action under this section only to the extent thai the application of the amendatory language imposes an inordinate burden apart from the law. rule, regulation, o~ ordinance being amended. (13) This section does not affect the sovereign immu- nity of government. 1'0.51 Land use and environmentat dispute resotu- tion.-- (1) This section may be cited as the 'Florida Land Use and Environmental Dispute Resolution Act.' (2) As used in this section, the term: (a) 'Development order" means any order, or notice of proposed state or regional governmental agency action, which is or will have the effect of granting, deny- ing, or granting with conditions an application for a development permit, and includes the rezoning of a spe- cific parcel. Actions by the state or a local government on comprehensive plan amendments are not develop- ment orders. (b) 'Development .permit' means any building per- mit, zoning permit, subdivision approval, certification. special exception, variance, or any other similar action o! local government, as well as any permit authorized to be issued under state law b government which has the development of real propert~ to, programs implementing cl 187, 258, 372, 373, 378, 380, 566 the includ?~'r~(~.~ited apt e r~s.l,~5.,. 1~61,- _1~_, 16~. and~l~a'~ ,~ [J 1997 Pg, ~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE FOR INDIAN WELLS GOLF VILLAS OBJECTIVE: The Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the County Water-Sewer District, to accept the newly-constructed water and sewer facilities to serve Indian Wells Golf Villas and authorize the recordation of the appropriate legal documents. CONSIDERATIONS: 1) The developer of Indian Wells Golf Villas has constructed the water and sewer facilities within dedicated utility easements to serve this development. See attached location map. 2) Deed, Bill of Sale and other related documents have been submitted to Engineering Review Services in order for the County to accept the water and sewer facilities in accordance with County Ordinances 78-10 and 79-33. 3) The water and sewer facilities will be, upon acceptance by the Board, operated and maintained by the County Utilities Division under a one (1) year maintenance guarantee furnished ky the developer. - o 4) The on-site inspection of the sewer facilities and water facilities has been conducted by the County Engineering Inspection section with the finding that the water and sewer facilities have been constructed in accordance with County Ordinances and Regulations. 5) The legal documents have been reviewed by the County Attorney and are legally sufficient for acceptance by the Board. 6) Surety for utilities Improvement acceptance. is covered under the Subdivision FISCAL IMPACT: The water and sewer facilities were constructed without cost to the County Water-Sewer District. During the first year, the water and sewer facilities are under a Contractual Guarantee. After that time, the cost of operating and maintaining the water facilities will be paid by monthly user revenues. AGEN D,A. ,I.T£M .~ ,JAN 2 8 1997 Executive Summary Indian Wells Golf Villas Page Two GROWTH MANAGE~4ENT IMPACT: The sewer facilities will be connected to the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant and the water facilities to the County Regional Water Treatment Plans. This project will not create a new impact, as it has been planned for within facilities available at present RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the County Water-Sewer District, accept the water and sewer facilities for Indian Wells Golf Villas, with the following stipulations: The water and sewer facilities to serve the project cannot be placed into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until the following items have been furnished: 1) Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a letter authorizing the placement of these systems into service, and; 2) Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements, and; 3) The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been satisfied, and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire hydrant for ownership and maintenance 4) Receipt of payment bacteriological testing for water usage from Utilities for PREPkRED BY: Shirley Nix, Engineering Technician Ii Date REVIEWED BY: Engineering Review Services Manager 'JAN g 8 1997 Pg. ~ Executive Summary Indian Wells Golf Villas Page Three Donald W. Arnold, AICP Planning Service Depa~.tment Director Vincent A. Cautero, AdminiStrator COM/4UNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTA SERVICES attachments Date Date 'JAN 2, 8 1997 OHS' THAT ARE NOT RECORDED LIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. RATTLESNAKE HAJ'I'iOCK ROAD LELY HICH BLYD. LDFLOWER WAY GRAND LELY DR1' LELY ISLAND LELY RESORT BL TRIANCLE BL LOCAT I ON MAP SABLE PAIL. Il RO~ 'JAN 2 81997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE A CHANGE ORDER TO WORK AGNOLI, BARBER AND BRUNDAGE, MAINTENANCE DREDGING. ORDER #ABB-FT-96-7 WITH INC. FOR CLAM PASS OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval ora Change Order to Work Order #ABB-FT-96-7 for services related to Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging in 1997. CONSIDERATIQN$:. Work Order #ABB-FT-96-7 was entered into with Agnoli, Barber and Brundage, Inc. to perform professional engineering services relative to monitoring the performance of Clam Pass during FY 96/97. Based upon the results of this monitoring, it is recommended that maintenance dredging of Clam Pass be performed prior to May 1, 1997. As such, it is necessary to obtain additional services relative to preparation of plans and specifications for bidding and construction, construction observation, and post-construction surveys and final certification. Therefore, approval of a Change Order as follows is requested to obtain these additional services: ADDITIONAL SERVICES AMOUNT I. Prepare Construction Plans and Specifications 2. Bidding and Pre-Construction Services 3. Construction Observations 4. Post-Construction Surveys and Certification 5. Monitoring Survey (July 1997) Total $7,100.00 6,070.00 4,500.00 3,495.00 :5,170.00 $26,335.00 A summary of the status ofthis Work Order as a result of this Change Order is as follows: Original Work Order Amount Sum of Previous Changes This Change Order (Add) Present Agreement Amount $8,590.00 0.00 26,335.00 34,925.00 FISCAL IMPACT: Cost: Fund: Cost Center: Project Number: $26,335.00; to be obligated in the budget for FY 96/97. (I 95) Tourist Development (60%) (110406) Beach Rer, ourishment, Category A (80222) Clam Pass Inlet Management Approval of a budget amendment will be necessary whereby funds will be transferred from the reserves of Fund 195 to Account No. 195-110406-631400-80222 to provide sufficient funds for this obligation. ,. :.'I 2 8 1537 Executive Summary Page 2 GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT; None RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: Approve a Change Order to Work Order #ABB-FT-96-7 with Agnoli, Barber and Bmndage, Inc. to provide additional services related to maintenance dredging of' Clam Pass. 2. Approve the necessary budget amendment for this obligation. 3. Authorize the OCPM Director to execute the Change Order. PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: REVIEWED BY: Harry E. Huber, Project Manager III Office of Capital Projects Management Adolf'o A....C~..ez, l~., Director Office of Capital Projects Management Raym~dd W. Miller, P.E.~ Interim Administrator Public Works Division Date:/. 2z.9 7 cc: Agnoli, Baxber and Bmndage, Inc. Beach RenourishmenffMaintenance Committee EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AMEND TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL GUIDELINES FOR CATEGORY C GRANTS OBJECTIVE: To amend Tourist Development Council guidelines for Category C grants CONSIDERATION: At the direction &the Board of County Commissioners the Tourist Development Council established a subcommittee to review current Category C guidelines. The subcommittee met twice and fowarded their recommendation to the full Tourist Council. The Council met .l'anuary 20, 1997 and voted to recommend the following Change "a verifiable audit" to "accounting which may be verified by County Internal Audit Departmenf'. Change the time for reporting financial information from 60 to 90 days. And add that the grantee must make a presentation to the TDC reporting the results &the event at its first meeting following the 90 days after the event. · Change the number of submission times for Category C applications from four to txvo annually. · Category C events must be held in the shoulder and off-season as opposed the event demonstrating the potential for attracting offseason visitors · Eliminate the provision for cash match and reimbursements ifthe Board approves only funding promotion and advertising. · Include that funding of Category C grants would only be for advertising and promoting an event. · Salaries &personnel would only be paid ifspeeified in the grant application. · Add a provision which would exclude funding of special events which are exclusively local in nature. Attached are all the recommended changes. Many of the recommendations clarify existing Ianguage and eliminate some redundancies. FISCAL IMPACT: None GROWTH MANAGEMENT IIVIPACT: None JAN 2 1997 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the guidelines for Category C Tourist Development grants as recommended by the Tourist Development Council and return with a resolution readopting all of the guidelines incorporating these changes. Prepared by. Reviewed by: Reviewed by:., J~...n Gansel, Budget Analyst Michael Smykowski, OMB Director geidi Ashto-n, Assistant County Attorney  / . Date: ,/~ 9' Date: Date:._~ ~[ ~ ~ Mission Statement The purpose of the Tourisl Development Coundl is to advise the Collier County Board of Commissioners with respect to the ~-penditure ofToutts~ Developmen! L~x revenue. Thc goal of Tourisl Tax expenditures is to promole tourism in Collier County ss'ia an emphasis on the shoulder and off season of May through November. Background and History The Touris~ Development Tax was approved by Collier County voters in November, 1992 under chapter 125 of the Florida Statutes. The tax adds two (2%) percent !o the bill paid by tourists for overnight accommodations at hotels, motels, apartment hotels, rooming houses, RV parks, and condominiums in Collier County. Visitors who rent acoommodafions in Collier County for six(6) months or less, pay thc tax. TLc Ordinance approving the tourist tax was amended effective January 1,1996 to increase thc mx to throe (3) percent. The additional one(1) percent is dedieated and will be used to repay funds borrowed for beach rcnourishmenL Thc third percent will be criminated when borrowed funds are repaid. Allocation of Revenues Category A: Beach Rcnourishmcnt and Pass Maintenance Sixty (60%) percent of tourist tax monies raised under the two (2%) tax are alloca{cd under Ordinance No. 92-60 to f'mance beach improvement, maintenance renourishment, restoration and erosion control. including pass and inlet maintenance. One hundred (100%) percent of the additional (l%)onc percent is allocated completely to Catego~' A for the purpose of repaying borrowed funds for the Beach Renourishment projecL C:~: Advertising and Promotion Twenty-five (25%) percent of tourist tax revenues raised undcr the two (2%) percent tax are alloeatcd under ordinance No. 92-60 to advertising and direct marketing to attract Iourists from outside of collier Count)' during the "shoulder and off season" of Ma)' tlu'ough November. Recomme. datlon: Change Category 13 to BI Cateoorv C: Local Projects and/or Activities which Promote Tourism Fiflcc~erccnt of tourist lax revenues raised under the two (2%) percent tax arc allocated under Ordinance No. 92-60 to local projects and/or aetivities which promote tourism with an emphasis on the 'shoulder and off season' of May through November. Change Category C to BZ Delete Fi. lteen (15%) percent. ,adder least eight (8%) but not more than fifleen (15~), Change Ordinance Ara. 92.60 to 96.$4 Add Category C ~[[useu,t '" Not to exceed seven (7%) percent of tourist tax revenue raised under the t~,o (2%) percent tax are a/lowed for the net operating costs of the museum. Funding for Economic Disaster:. Five (5%) percent of Categories B and C are placed in a separate fund and reserved for advertising for cconomic disaster. The purpose of the funding is to provide immediate information through the media rcg,'u'ding the condition of Collier County should an economic disaster occur. AGENDA ITEM No. ? s' JAN 2 8 1997 Pg.._ General Disbursement Guidelines All Tourist Dcvclopmcnt Revenue allocation for Categories B and C. funding, sh.~11 be n~dc by awards of grants to organLzation meeting all g~cral disburscmmt guidelines dcscribed below. Each organization must also meet thc supplement disburserncnt guid¢llncs and eligibility rcquircments for thc spccific category of funding applied for. RecommendaEon: Chan~e B and C !o ~I and B2 Grant Rcquircmcnts Funds allocated for thc proposed activity or project may be expended only on those budgct linc items spccificd for each such cxpenditpre in thc contract and in thc case of cach linc item, in an amount not greater than specified for such expenditure in thc conl~aclj. Recommendation: Delete for each ruch expenditure in the contract and In the case of each line Item. in an amount not greater than specified for such expenditure in the contract. 2. Any ex'penditurc by d~c Grantco which is an unauthorized expenditure shall not be eligible for rcimburscmcnL 3. All matcrials submitted with thc application will be held for consideration of the grant request and cannot be returned. Grant funds will be disbursed only after the contract has been signed by all parties and only after the Grantee is in compliance with Collier County accounting procedure. There will be no contract extensions for any non-expended grant funds existing at the end of thc contract period unless othen%,ise approved by thc County in advance and duc to unforeseen circumstances. It is cxt.rcmelv important that any changes in thc project/activity, such as project dales,{ } key participants, and budget revisions, be submitted l'cst to thc TDC for consideration, approval. ,'md conlx'act amendment (if applicable). This shall be done in a limely manner. All proposed contracts and contract amendments muss be approve4 by the TDC and tb~ County. Recommendation: Delete It is extremely important that. Change any to Any. Add§ contract amen&nents Change be to shall be. approval to recommendation, Delete contract amendments, Change must be approved to must be reviewed, and the to and approved by A grant recipient is required to maintain complete and accurate accounting and project or activity records and keep grant funds in a separate checking account. A complete and verifiable audil is required on each grant by thc recipient and is duc Io thc Administrator within sixty (60) days at the completion of thc grant,. Recommendation: De/eta and verifiable audit is. Add accounting which tnay be verified by County Interna/,ffudit Department, Change 60 to ~0, grant to et~ent or at a date predetermined by the TDC and BCC. Add Grantee shall make a presentation to TDC the first meeting following the ~0 days after the event to provide results of accounting and to an.orer questions.. The TDC ma), change the PO day. e reporting time ba.r.e.d on the nature of the tn'enl. All revenue related Io the project or activity should be recorded, and all expenditures must be recorded, and all ex'pcnditures must be incurred within the contract period. Revenue for thc proicct/acfivitY may be anticipated aI the time of application and may be utilized in meeting; the applicant's match requirement for the oroiect or activity. Recommendation: Change should to shall. Delete Revenue for the project/activity may be anticipated at the time of application and ma.v be utilized in meeting the applicant's match requirement for the project or actit4ty. AGENDA ITEM JAN 2 8 1997 pg. Each grantee is requLred to submit annual fLqancial statemenls on the financial condition of the project, or activity, or the grantee organization, and a special report on the receipts and expenditures of the grant related projec~activity pursuant to the executed agreemenL Fa]lure to submit acceptable financial or special reports in accordance with any contract will result Lq the cessation of reimburscrnents on all grant contracts the grantee may have with the County at the dine, effective on the date the submissions become overdue. Under such circumstances, no further reimbursements will be made for the duration of contract periods and any rdmbursements already made shall be subject to later return to thc County if acceptable statements and/or special reports required by those granl contracts are not submitled as requLred or if reimbursements are later shown to not be properly matched. 10. Each grantee is required to submit a Certificate of Insurance naming Collier County, and its Board of County Commissioners and the Tourist Development Council as additionally insured. Thc certificate must be valid for the period of the promotion, and be issued by a company licensed Lq thc State of Florida, and provide General Liability insurance for no less than the foltowLqg amounts; or such other amounts required by thc C.ounty's Risk Managcmcnt Departmenl: · Bodily Injury Liability $300,000 each claim per person °Property Damage Liability $300.000 each claim per person *Personal Injury Liability S300,000 each claim per person oWorkcr's Compensation and Employer' Liability - statutory Applicatlnn and Revimv Process I. TD C Administrator Thc Collier County Manager or his designee shall be the administrator of thc Tourist Development Council Applications and information for project funding should be obtained from: Adminisu'ator/Direetor Collier Count)' Tourist Devclopmcm Council 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples. Florida 3396 941-774-8717 Appllcqtions All applications must include a comprehensive ma.,'k~ing { }action plan which addresses the mission statement of the Tourist Grant Program and a time line with particular emphasis on generating room/nights in the of season. Fifteen (15) copies of the application must be submiued. Thc Tourist Development Council will review applications for project funding at each quarterly meeting. Quarterly meetings are scheduled for Februa~., May, August, and November, All applicalions must be'submitted thirty (30) days prior to the next TDC meeting. Ail applications shall be used to determine eligibility and priority of funding. The TDC Administrator will review the application for cc, repleteness. Incomplete or insufficient applications will automatically be returned. Minor irrcgul,'u'itics may be waived by the Tourist Development Council, and supplemental information may be provided by the applicant prior to the meeting at which tho Tourist Development Council will consider tho application. ,4ddf/ and detailed. Change February, May, ,~ugust. and ~Vovember to Category B2 applications will be heard only at the 3~ay and ffovember meetings. Categoo, B I applications will be heard at any scheduled meeting. The TDC Administrator will submit the application lo thc'I'DC with an evaluation rclativc to thc selection criteria. Thc County during its annual budget process will set an amount to be allocated toward projecl funding. This amount will be based upon the Tourist Tax Revenues collected during thc prcvio~ fiscal .,,,ear. The TDC will hold hearings on applications on a quarterly basis. The TDC Admin advertise thc schedule of quarterly TDC meetings on or about the beginning of September of ca Thc TDC will then make its project funding recommendations known to thc Board of County Commissioners.. The Bce will revi~v TDC recommendations and f'mally approve projects. ;trator ~3ItENDA ITEM h :'eauo.__L JAN 2 8 1997 Pg._ 5 3. Presentations. Thc Admln~s~tor or his dcsi~nc~ shall schedule ail qualified applications for presentations before the Tourist Dcvelopmeat Council on the next appropriate meeting date. F. ach qualified applicant may bc provided an opportunity to make a presmtation bcforo thc TDC or Board of County Commissioners at thc discxction of the chairman or y thc acclamation of thc Tourist Dcvclopmcnt Council or Board of Count)' Commissioners, respectively. 4. Public Record. All material submitled with the project funding application will bca maltcr of public record, open to inspection by an)' citizen as provided in Chaplet 199, Laws of Florida. Supplemental Disbursement Guidelines for Category C Local Projects/Activities Which Promote Tourism In addition to thc gmcral disbursement guidelines. Category C applicants must meet thc following st pplcmcntal rcquircmenls: 1. Selection Criteria: Category C funding will bc awa'dcd Io those eligible applicants applying for eligible projects which demonstrate the potenfia~ for attracting out of county, "._shoulder and off season" ,.'isilo~ Recommendation: Delete "shoulder and off season" visitors. ,4dd Tire event shall occur between 3gay to Arovember. 2. Award of Contract.: Aflcr approval by the Board of County Commissioncrs. selected applicants shall enla' into conlracts with the County. Special Conditions. a. Eligible organizations awarded Category C funds aD'cc to prominently list Collier Count)' Tourist Development Council as one of thc project sponsors on collalcml materials and advertisements. b. Eligible organizations awarded Calcgory C funds aD'cc to supply estimated figures in thc narrative report for thc following: · numbcrofparticipants · out of count)' participants · room nights generated by thc event c. Reimbursement of Grants. In the event that revenues of a special event or project received by the Grantee exceed thc actual costs incurred by thc Grantee in staging tile special event or project, then, file amounts clig~Ic for grant reimbursement shall bc dcc~cascci by the excess revenues up to thc full amount of the grant. Recomme. d~n'o.: Add Delete/tent C if/he Board approves use offund.~ for only advertising promotion. d. An,.' ro'ectr ue lin ovcrF'iveHundrcdThou dDoll,-u's S500000. of Touris~ Development rcvcnu¢ rc_..quires a recommmdation of six out of thc nine members of thc Tourist Development Council. Recommendation: Delete item d. c. For-profit corporations arc roquirod to provide a 50% match in cash of thc requested TDC funds. { } Not-for-profit organizations arc not required to provide ma~ching funds. Recommendation: Change item e. to ti. AddO ^~o ca.~h match .'ill be required ifTDC funds are used for advertising and promofion. lncligihlc Expcnditurm and Organizations Thc fo~diturcs and ~ons arc in¢lie:iblc for I'undin.[ with Tourist Dcvclo_gmcnt revenues. Ch ange to Category C funds shall only be used to advertise and promote the event. Incligiblc Expenditures I. Armual operating cx'pcnditures not directly rclaled to thc activity or projccl. 2. Salarics of full-time staff'.. Employment of personnel not dh'ectly rclated to thc actMty or project { }. Recomme, daEon: Delete Salaries offull-tlme staff. ,4dd0 and not specked in grant application Real propcrty Dt, lete Capital improvcmcnL including but not limited to new construction, renovation. and installation or replacement of fixtures. Change number ~ ta$ AGENDA ITEM stor31~. JAN 2 8 1997 $. ~pcrson~l propen'y, ~ncludlngbul no! I~il~ ~o o~ce f~hings or ~u~pmen~ p~t ~o~ or indMd~ pi~ of m. Recom~ndat~n: Add Purchase of Change Tangible to tangible, nu~ ~ to 4 6. Inl~e~, or r~u~ioa ofdefici~ or Io~. E~ in~M or obligalM prior Io or ~ler proj~ fund~g p~od. Change nu~er 6to 5 7. Pdza money, ~chol~hlps, aw~, pl~u~, or ~fi~l~. Change number 7 to 6 8. Travel ~d p~ diem ~enses P01 ~0~at~ direly with proic~, Per diem ex3~s~ for ~ cyst in cxccs$ of fl~e amounts au~ofiz~ in $c~ion 11Z06 !, Florida Slniute~. Change to Trm,el not directly associated with project. Change nu~er ~ to 7 9. Proje~s which ~c r~M Io pflvat~ or cxcl~ive p~icipaflon cxc~t for invitational ~'cn~ which r~ube a pr~;flon ofp~clp~ ~u~ pmv~ ability to gcn~tc hotcl room nigh~ duHng ~c Naples' ~u should~ ~on. C~ange nu~er 9 t, ~ 10. Pdvatc cntcm~m~k food or b~e~g~ ~c~t for ~$4mfion~ o'm~ which r~ulrc a pr~u~o~on ofpmic~ ~u~ p~vcn ability to gcn~tc hotel room nigh~ during fl~c Naplcs' ~ should~ s~on. Change number I0 to ~ I i. M~ing pa)'m~ or rcimbu~ts for goods or sc~ic~ purch~ for prcvious or ofl~cr o'~ts. Changenumb~ I1 to I0 Add II. Events which are exclusively local in nature such as a parade. AGENDA ITEM JAN 2 8 1997 Pg. /7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REQUEST DIRECTION TO AMEND CATEGORY A TOURIST DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES TO INCLUDE OTHER INLET AND INLAND WATERWAYS NOT CURRENTLY SPECIFIED O~3JECTIVE: To request direction to amend Category A Tourist Development guidelines to include other inlet and inland waterways. CONSIDERATION: The current Category A Tourist Development guidelines specify work relative to Doctors, Wiggins, and Clam Passes only. Category A applications request funding for additional areas. The Beach Renourishment Committee has suggested the guidelines be clarified to reflect the other inlets and inland waterways that are now covered by inlet management plans and other reasonable projects, such as the Marco Beach Management Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: None GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None RECOM},IENDATION: Board direct the Beach Committee and the Tourist Development Council to review the Category A guidelines and report recommendations to the Board. Prepared bY:~st Date:/~~ Reviewed by:. Date: Michael Smykowski, OMB Director Reviewed by:~~l$~~L Date: %_.L~~ q Heidi Ashton, Assistant County Attorney AGENDA ITEM JAN 2 8 1997 Pg._ I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO APPROVE FUNDING CAXAMBAS PASS MAINTENANCE DREDGING 5380,600, T-GROIN CONSTRUCTION IN CAPRI/BIG MARCO PASS S363,200, AND CLAM PASS MAINTENANCE DREDGING $13,830. CATEGORY A TOURIST DEVELOPMENT FUNDS OBJECTIVE: To approve funding Caxambas Pass Maintenance Dredging $380,000, T- Groin Construction in Capri/Big Marco Pass $363,200, and Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging $13,830 Category A Tourist Development funds. CONSIDERATIONS: The City/County Beach Renourishment Committee reviewed the attached applications and recommended approval with the condition that the Board consider clarifying the guidelines as presented in Executive Summary item 8E2. At the January 20, 1997 meeting the Tourist Development Council unanimously recommended approval of the three grant applications. FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds are available in Fund 195, Tourist Development Category A reserves. A budget amendment is required. GROWTH MANAGEiS, LENT IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: Approve funding three grant applicants totaling $757,630 Tourist Development funds Category A and budget amendment. t//Jean Gahsel, Budget Analyst / ,/ Reviewed by:. Date: Michael Smykowski, OMB Director Reviewed by:~~~~~;~Date: / ~.__~..~.~ '-~ Heidi Ashton, Assistant County Attorney AGENDA ITEM No.~ JAN 2 8 1997 Exhibit A Collier County Tourist Development Council GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance (Beach improvement, maintenance renourishment, restoration and erosion control, including pass and inlet maintenance) Completed applications shall be submitted to the following address: Administrator Collier County Touri~;t Development Council County Manager's Office 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 33962 1. Name and Address of Applicant Organization: Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Harry Huber Project Manager III 774-8192 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Commissioner ~'ohn C, Norris Chairman Board of County Commissioners 4. Brief Project Description: Caxambas Pass Maintenance Dredging --^GENDA ITEM JAN 2 8 1997 ~,g., ox` ,., Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 2 6. 7. 8. Estimated project start date: February. 1997 Estimated project duration: 6 months Total amount requested: $980,600 If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes No 9. Identify the goals and objectives for the project: The goals of' the Caxambas Pass Inlet Mana_~ement Plan are to: (1~) backpass small o_uantitles of' sand to offset the updrift beach erosion: ¢23 protect and enhance the natural resources of the ~yHem and: (3) provide a permanent marked navigation channel with adequate water depth, The objective of this project is tO implement these goals, lO. Describe what benefits will be received from the project: The project will im_orove the navigability of eaxambas Pass and restore Marco Island's shoreline, 11. · 12. Describe how the effectiveness of' the project will be evaluated: Monitoring of' project performance will enable the effect- iveness of the project to be evaluated as well as provide an indi~;ation when futur~ improvements will ~¢ necessary, Describe how the project enhances exiting County Tourist Development Programs: This project provides improvements recommended in the Caxambas Pass Inlet Mana_~ement Plan which is an integral component of the County Tourist Development program, .lAN 2 8 1997~ ACENDA ITEM Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 3 13. Describe how financial resources will be monitored: The r ' w'l mana ed hr u h the existing. ,nni i n n will mini 'an r 'n fi 't ' n mn e ai f h r' n' f" ' r'n a i d wi i ' r - 'e · 2 f n u ' ' n 'Mana e- nt t T e al m n h r e ud et i 380 600 14. Plcase complete the following questions and provide additional information, if necessary: Does the proposed expenditure further the objectives outlined in the Mission Statement7 Yes ( X ) No ( ) Does the proposed expenditure fairly distribute monies to different geographic areas of the County? Yes ( X ) Does the proposed expenditure promote environmental awareness and understanding and does the proposed project address environmental considerations? Yes ( X ) No ( ) Is the proposed project part of the ongoing Collier County beach restoration project and/or pass maintenance/ dredging/management projects? Yes ( X ) No ( ) Is the proposed project required by a regulatory agency as a condition for approval/funding the Collier County beach restoration projects? Yes ( ) NO (X) ^GENDAITEM JAN 2 8 1997 Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 4 * Will the proposed project contribute signiHcantly to the progress of the beach restoration projects? Yes ( X ) No ( ) * Will the project decrease the local cost share of an overall beach restoration project, either by decreasing the total project cost or by increasing the local/non-local ratio7 Yes ( ) No ( X ) * Will the project improve understanding of alternative technologies that may contribute to a cost-effective beach restoration project? Yes ( X ) No ( ) * Is there a potential for an alternative/matching funding source7 Yes ( ) No ( X ) If "Yes", please identify, Is the project consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and/or standing Board of County Commission action? Yes ( X ) No ( ) Has the project been reviewed and recommended by the Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Advisory Committee? Y Thi 1' i w n' ' h ach n ri hm / ' n mi ir u rl h I in n r 997 Th ir m i ' AGENDA ITEM JAN28199- Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 5 I have read the Beach Renourishment and Pass Guidelines and criteria and agreq~that my organizatign will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signat~ure Yr ?rga (~tati60 Chief Official or D,,ign,, Date: ~ *Director of Offie~ of Capital Proj~eta Management authorized to ~ign Category "A" appIieations on behalf of th~ Chairman ofth~ Board of CountyCommi~sioner$. Approved by Board of County Commi~sionera on Auguat 24, 1993, Agenda Item 16(H) (2). AGENDA ITEM No.~ $ (3~ JAil 2 8 1997 Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 6 PROJECT BUDGET. Caxambas Pass Maintenance Dredging ACTIVITY Engineering Services Construction Project Management Fees (OCPM) AMOUNT $ 34,200 $333,200 S 13,200 Total S350,600 JAN28199- t~j TYPICAL SECTION D-D' °pw- ' ........... ~' ':'~-I° -10 -lit -12 -10 I~ 200 300 DISTANCE ~R~CAL EXAGG[RA~ON = 20:1 OF MEXICO · .R145 PROPOSED SEA CH FILL MARCO ISLAND COMPOUND ,,, ~r:~o ,~ ,, ... ':' .... '" ' " ,'.";~ '"--.. ,' ', ; ', ........ ,' ,' .:... / /, ', I '.. ..-.': .... ::-..,,,,d.H/ti?.~ ....... ! : ' %', , -' .- ~ / ' .' ~,,~l,l'tllll'~"' ; , ,, ,' , -- · · ../ , -..,_ _,_. ...... -,.~,. ...... ,/ - ,--, ,-~.-, ,- ,. :, ,,, · '- ",'-- "' - ~ ~ -"-' · '.., ,,~: , ,~ .,~¢I.LI-I'LLI.~;"-': .... . ..... .... ',, t, / ' : ,. :" ~ ; ~'-:_'-_'-Z-::,.",. , ,, ..... .... ...~~,y ~ ,~; ./.:..;/ - _. , ~ ,... ... / .oo...-.r...-..., .. ·... , , .zrl~t~'P,~~.'.,,::?; , ,. , . . -.. . ..... · . --.*.?.~v'~~_-- ".;-'.-,~NT..~ ! ."_,, .. · .. · -. ..... . r ~_** ~..?~ '.'- ..'_.::-%./ , .... -'.?..~;,=-'=,=..=_--.-'.~'.:-' .-~-_'*; .... '., .... BORRO _, ...;..- ., I /, .-'-' ~ , /' \...:F .... o,;' ,/ ,£ ., · ....ti '~ ' ...-° .... '~._.o~ ~'° .oo--'° .- °.°.o- ..o-. ...... o o&. .... .," , .. ~ ='*- AGENDA ITEM : " ' l' No._~_.t__C.~J. COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN DREDGF NATURAL. SCOUR CHANNEL- '3'~K ~l 1997 Coll.:i.e,' County Tourist, De ~e[ol:i~.nt- .~ounc~. G~ant, App!~.cataion , Page 7 Exhibit A Collier County Tourist Development Council GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance (Beach improvement, maintenance renourishment, restoration and erosion control, including pass and inlet maintenance) Completed applications shall be submitted to the following address: Administrator Collier County Tourist Development Council County Manager's Office 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 33962 1. Name and Address of Applicant Organization: Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail Ea~ Naples. Florida 34112 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Harry Huber Pro|eot M~nagcr III 774-$192 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Commissioner John C. Norris Chairman Board of County Commissioners 4. Brief Project Description: T-(~roin ¢on$1[ruction in Capri/Big Marco Pass AGENDA ITEM JAN 2 8 199; Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 2 5. 6. 7. 8. Estimated project start date: February, 1997 Estimated project duration: 6 months Total amount requested: $363,200 If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes No X Identify the goals and objectives for t'~e project: The objective of this proiect is to provide the services . necessary for the design and construction of T-Groins composed of sand filled geo-textile bags along Hideaway Beach tO provide immediate protection from inlet impacts and storm protection of endangered upland Structures, The .. proposed project is a recommended alternative as identified in the Big Marco Pass and Capri Pass Inlet Management Plan, 10. Describe what benefits will be received from the project: The proPoSed project is intended tO reduce the erosion along Hideaway Beach and t0 accumulate sand tO replenish the eroded shoreline, This will preserve the recreational benefits 0f the beach as well as marine turtle nesting habitat, Additionally, it will reduce the need for., periodic nourishment, which is not cost effective, 11. Describe how the effectiveness of the project will be evaluated: Post-Construction monitoring in accordance with permit conditions will provide a basis for evaluating the project performance and confirm the installation as a long-term solution tO th, erosional im_~aets. 12. Describe how the project enhances exiting County Tourist Development Programs: This project provides improvements recommended in the Capri/Big Marco pall Inlet Management Plan which i~ an AGENDA ITE~V JAN 2 8 199; pg. Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 3 'ne ralc m hen f h n uri Devel ment 13. Describe how financial resources will be monitored' h r' d e w'll n hr h th xi in fin n iai nd rn na m n r 1' r n and will be dm'mi ered r' mana r in he file f aial r' t na m n Th a i f h ~ n itsof' 1 fen in erin ~ Services assoc____jated with the e i hand construction f h ' t' 2 n ' ' r'e fana ern nt · d 4 i Ii i nfee.~ The t I i 363 200 00 14. Please complete the following questions and provide additional information, if necessary: Does the proposed expenditure further the objectives outlined in the Mission Statement? Yes ( X ) No ( ) Does the proposed expenditure fairly distribute monies to different geographic areas of the County? Yes ( X ) No ( ) Does the proposed expenditure promote environmental awareness and understanding and does the proposed project address environmental considerations? Yes ( X ) No ( ) Is the proposed project part of the ongoing Collier County beach restoration project and/or pass maintenance/ dredging/management projects? Yes ( X ) No ( ) AGE~DA ITE~ No._ ~._ ~.~~ JAN 2 8 1~ Collier County Tourist Development Council · Grant Application Page 4 * Is the proposed project required by a regulatory agency as a condition for approval/funding the Collier County beach restoration projects? Yes ( ) No ( X ) Will the proposed project contribute significantly to the progress of the beach restoration projects? Yes ( X ) No ( ) Will the project decrease the local cost share of an overall beach restoration project, either by decreasing the total project cost or by increasing the local/non-local ratio? Yes ( ) No ( X ) Will the project improve understanding of alternative technologies that may contribute to a cost-effective beach restoration project? Yes ( X ) No ( ) Is there a potential for an alternative/matching funding source? Yes ( ) No ( X ) If "Yes", please identify. Is the project consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and/or standing Board of County Commission action? Yes ( X ) No ( ) Has the project been reviewed and recommended by the Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Advisory Committee? Yes. This application was considered by the Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Committee at their r~gularly scheduled meeting on lanuar_v 3. 1997. Their recommendation is attached hereto. JAN 2 8 199; Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page $ I have read the Beach Renourishment and Pass Guidelines and criteria and agre~t that my o~'ganizatlon will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signatu~ ~/f Organ, j~atroa~'s Chief Official or Designee* Date: ~ *Director of Office of Capital Projects Management authorized to sign Category "A" appllcations on behalf of' the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. Approved by Board of County Commissioners on August 24, 1993, Agenda Item 16(H) (2). H gH/jaa/1,1910 AGENDA IT. EM JAN 28 1997 pg._ ~5 Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 6 2. 3. 4. Proiect Bud~tet T-GKOIN CONSTI~UCTION IN CAPI~I/BIG MAP. CO PASS Engineering Services Construction Project Management Fees (OCPM) Permit Application Fees Total ~,MOUNT $28,500.00 $307,700.00 $12,500.00 $14.500.00 $363,200.00 AGENDA IT~EM JAN 2 8 1997 pg.___l q ISLAND N1 SOUTH POINT (APPROX.) 7' NGVD --{ s,'E SHEET '1'--' NOTES: $. 2. 3. 4. .~. 7. Collier County Tourist Oeveiopment Council Grant ~pplication Page I I I (APPROX.) +1.$7' NGVO ~--~-~?-- ....~ SEE SHEET 3F--J #1 MARCO ISLAND EATHYtdL'TRY BASED ON HYDROGRAPHIC SURV£Y CONDUCTED BY SEA SYSTEMS CORPORATION COidPL~'TED 11/94. APPROXIMATE: MNW LOCAT1ON BASED ON SURVEY CONDUCTED BY AGNOU, BARBER AND BRUNDACE COMPLETED 1/92. ALL ELL'VATION$ AS SHOWN ARE RErER£NCI~D TO NATIONAL C£O0£TIC V£RTICAL DATUM, I<J2g (NGVD). E:CL rSTABUSHCD IN lggl FOR T14E: k~ARCO ISLAND BEACH R£NOURISHIA£NT PROJECT. T-GROIN POSITION AND CON?IGURATION SUBJ£CT TO REVISION BASED UPON pENDING CURRENT MEASURfldENT$ AND FIN&L DESIGN. SEE: SHE:bT 3 OF $ fOR ROYAL MARCO POINT DETAILS. SEE SHE:ET 40Ir 5 FOR SOUTH POINT OETAIL~. $E:£ $H£~ $ oF 5 fOR T-GROIN DETAILS. pE:RMIT ORAW~NO, NOT fOR CONSTRUCTION. ,ii ~.GENDA ITE_~ ~,N 28 1~, EXIIIBIT A Collier County Tourist Development Council GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance (Beach improvement, maintenance renourishment, restoration and erosion control, including pass and inlet maintenance) Completed applications shall be submitted to the following address' Administrator Collier County Tourist Development Council County Manager's Office 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 33962 1. Name and Address of Applicant Organization: flier n B r n mini i n rs 3301 ami iT all Na~ 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Ha rr HLY__.~_b_~ Pr 'eot an 774-81 92 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: ~ mini i n hn rri ~ ard un mini 'n 4. Brief Project Description: lam Pa M iht n n Dre in AGENDA ITEM JAN 2 8 1997 Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 2 6. 7. 8. Estimated project start date: Estimated project duration: ~~ Total amount requested: 3 830 00 ~ If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes No X 9. Identify the goals and objectives for the project: The 'e tiv f hi r ' ' rf rmthen ar un ti n i w' inin I n - rm rmit main ain fl w h u ' i h r c f dev I in th 'hi m a I ~ 10. Describe what benefits will be received from the project: Acqui~,;iti0n of a tong term permit well provide the uninter- rupted capability of maintaining..~;ufficient tidal exchange for adequate fl~;hlng of the mangroves surrounding the Clam Bay area, I1. Describe how the effectiveness of the project will be evaluated: Monitoring of project performance will enable the effectivenes,,; of the project tO be evaluated as well as provide pertinent information necessary for development of the Clam Pa~s Inlet Management plan, 12. Describe how the project enhances exiting County Tourist Development Programs: This project will provide the criteria necessary to complete the Clam Pass Inlet Managem,nt plan which is an integral component of the County Tourist Dcvelopmcnl program, AGENDA ITEM No._¢ JAN 2 8 1997 Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 3 13. Describe how financial resources will be monitored: The project budget will be managed (;hr0ugh the existing financial and management structure of Collier County and will be adminis(;ered by a project manager in the Office of Capital Projects Management, The basis of the project budge(; consists of: ('1) Cost of _~rofessional 1;ervices associated with the performance Of permit monitoring requiremen(;S: (2) Permit Application Fees and: ('3) Pro!ect Management Fees. The total amount Of (;he proposed budget is $13.$30.00, 14. Please complete the following questions and provide additional information, if necessary: Does the proposed expenditure further the objectives outlined in the Mission Statement? Yes (X) No ( ) Does the proposed expenditure fairly distribute monies to different geographic areas of the County7 Yes ( X ) No ( ) Does the proposed expenditure promote environmental awareness and understanding and does the proposed project address environmental considerations? Yes ( X ) No ( ) Is the proposed project i',a~t of the ongoing Collier County beach restoration projec~ and/or pass maintenance/ dredging/management projects? Yes ( X ) No ( ) Is the proposed project required by a regulatory agency as a condition for approval/funding the Collier County beach restoration projects.'? Yes ( ) No ( X ) AGENOA ITl[ ,o.._,S.J.J JAN 2 8 19 Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 4 Will the proposed project contribute significantly to the progress of' the beach restoration projects? Yes ( ) No ( X ) Will the project decrease the local cost share of' an overall beach restoration project, either by decreasing the total project cost or by increasing the local/non-local ratio? Yes ( ) No ( X ) Will the project improve understanding of' alternative technologies that may contribute to a cost-effective beach restoration project? Yes ( X ) No ( ) * Is there a potential f.or an alternative/matching funding source? Yes ( ) No ( X ) If "Yes", please identify. Is the project consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and/or standing Board of County Commission action7 Yes ( X ) No ( ) Has the project been reviewed and recommended by the Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Advisory Committee? Ye Thi lic i wa n i r theB ach Ren uti hm n/ ' n i h ir ularl h I ' 997 Th irr ~ r ~ AGENDA ITEM JAN 2 8 1997 Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 5 I have read the Beach Renourishment and Pass Guidelines and criteria and will comply with all guidelines and criteria. Signaturet/of Orga ~ti.oln's Chief Official or Designee* Date: /~.//~/qo, _ *Director of Office of Capital Projects Management authorized to sign Category "A" applications on behalf' of' the Chairman of' the Board of County Commissioners. Approved by Board of County Commissioners on August 24, 1993, Agenda Item 16(H) (2). Grant Application 14912 AGE. f,JDA ITEM JAN 2 8 1997 Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 6 Clam Pass Maintenance Dredging Monitoring Services Permit Application Fee Project Management Fees TOTAL $8,590.00 $2,600.00 $13,830.00 JAN 2 8~ NORTH D;SPOSAL AREA: ~1 pREVIOUSLY uSED IN THE 1995 / I DREDGING. AUTHOriZED UNOER / OEP JCP pERMiT 11285g059.~ 10o ~T SOUTH OF OEP ~ONU~ENT R-41 AND EAT[NO TO APPROXlUATELY 600 ~T NORTH Or R-~7. ~y Tourist Development C-~ Grant Application ::.:.:.:.:,:,,,..,...,.,, :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:.:,:.: ~..:':::......., :::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::: FOR INLET 0ETAIL --J SE£ SHEET 7 OF 7 FOR TYPICAL DISPOSAL DETAIL sEE SHEET 2 or SOUTH DISPOS.~L AREA: pRCvIO~LY USED IN THE 1996 DREDGING. AUTHORIZED UNDER OEP ~P pERmiT 1128~g05g. AND IN 1995 UN0[R 0[P JCP PERMIT 112659015. COMU[NC[ APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET NORTH OF MONUMENT R-42 ANO [XT[NO TO APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET SOUTH. APPLICANT: COLLIER COUNTY OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGEMENT ~OUTER wATER GOOY: GULF OF MEXICO INNER WATER BODY: CLAM BAY via CLAM PASS TYPE OF WORK: MAINTENANCE DREDGING or FLUSHIHG OUTLET OF CLAM '.-;-;-; .::;... eD rJ DENOTES DNR R[rERENCE MONUMENT pERMIT ORA'WINOS. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIO AGE )CATTY'- CLAM PASS tdAINT[ lANCE OR£0C, IN.~.- SITE P A~ Pg.. .... C:J.c _ --. -- . _~% o,,c: ,o;,/. ,,.x: s?u, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONSIDER AMENDING ORDINANCE 92-60 RELATING TO THE LEVY OF 2% TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX TO INCLUDE THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC FISHING PIER OBJECTIVE: To consider amending Ordinance 92-60 relating to the levy of 2% Tourist Development Tax to include the reconstruction of a public fishing pier. CONSIDERATION: The City of Naple~ submitted a grant application to the Tourist Development Council for $450,000 for reconstruction of the outer half of the Naples Pier. At the January 20, 1997 meeting the Tourist Development Council reviewed this application. Currently local ordinance does not provide for funding this project however public fishing piers is an authorized use of tourist tax revenues in Florida Statutes. The Tourist Development Council voted unanimously to recommend the Board of County Commissioners amend the local ordinance to include public fishing piers as provided for in Florida Statutes. The vote included reducing the allocation for Category A uses (Beach Maintenance). GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in 001-013010 for advertising the ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: The Board of County Commissioners consider amending Ordinance 92-60 to include public fishing piers as an authorized use and direct staff accordingly. Prepared b y:~X-~'--"~. Date:~ t~/Jean Gansel, Budget Analyst Reviewed by:_ Michael Smykowski, OMB Director Reviewed by: ~~~~~d~~- . Heidi Ashton, P~sistant County Attorney Date: AGENOA~IT.F.~M Noo~ JAN 8 997 Pg.__/ NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 7:15 STH STREET SOUTH, NAPLES, FL 34102 SI3-434-4655 FAX NO. t15.434-3059 TO: Board of County Commissioners, Collier County FROM: Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Committee THROUGH: Collier County Tourist Development Council SUBJECT: Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Funding Request Recommendation The attached request for TDC Category A funding, submitted by th___~e ~les : to be used for reconstruction of the outer half of the Naples Pier is recommended to be: __Approved as submitted. Approved with the following changes: Deferred to: ' Disapproved. Comments: the Beach Renourishment/Management Committee acknowledged receipt of the fundin rg~est and voted to forward it to the Tourist Development Council for consideration for ~ under Cate or~. The Committee also understands that such work on a.~ublic fishing pier is allowed b~the Florida Statutes 3CS/TDC~'OIV4. Date 16 De JAN 2 8 997 Pg o ~- BILL BARNETI' MAYOR November 8, 1996 Mr. Richard E. Lydon Chairman, Beach Renourishment Committee 450 Tradewinds Avenue Naples, FL 34108 Dear Mr. Lydon: The historic Naples Pier has been an important part of our community for more than one hundred years. It was first built to serve as the major point of commerce for the young community growing along Florida's gulf coast. In more recent years, it has served to provide generations of residents and visitors with beautiful sunsets, fishing opportunities and a unique perspective of our coastal community. During 1995 and early 1996, the City of Naples and Collier County jointly funded the rebuilding of the inward half of the Naples Pier, damaged by storms and years of exposure to the elements. The elected officials chose to rebuild that section of the pier with a concrete foundation and a wood superstructure to add permanence to the pier and yet to retain the historical look and feel. The State of Florida Department of Parks & Recreation also contributed $100,000 to this effort. To complete the work begun in 1995, the City of Naples is requesting $450,000 in Tourist Development Tax revenues to rebuild the outer half of the Fishing Pier to the same standards as the work in place on the inward half. This will allow for this historical structure to provide enjoyment to future generations of our residents and visitors to our community. Sincerely, Bill Barnett Mayor 735 EIGHTH STREET SOUTH · NAPLES. FLORIDA .'t~I02.6796 TEL {941) 434-4601 FAX (941) 4M.483.~ VOICE MAIL 433.8345 AGENDA ITEM .... JAN 2 S 1997 November 14, 1996 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAG[ Mr. Richard E. Lydon Chairman, Beach Renourishment Committee 450 Tradewlnds Ave. Naples, FL 34108 Dear Mr. Lydon: The City of' Naples is pleased to submit appllcafion for Tourist Development funding to complete the rebuilding of.the historic Naples Pier. As you are aware, the inner half of,the structure was rebuilt in 1995-96, using concrete piling to provide belier storm resistance for the structure. This project cost :;650,000 and was financed 50-50 by the City of' Naples and Collier County, pbs $100,000 funding from a State of Florida grant. The outer half' of the structure was seriously damaged by Tropical Storm Keith in 1988 ~;nd was totally rebuilt. We have received FEMA funding to complete some necessary repair work to that section. That work will be completed prior to the start of, hurricane season 1997. Suboceanic Consultants has estimated that the total costs to rebuilt the outer half, of' the Naples Pier will be ~n the range of $450,000. To provide for the orderly financing of'that project, we are requesting Beach Renoufishrnent funding of $150,000 annually for each of the next three years. The Naples Pier has served as a dest~ation for thousands of visitors to our community for many years. As the laxpayers of the City of Naples and Collier County have paid for halfofthe project, it |s appropriate that Tourist Tax dollars be used to complete the project. AS an aIternative funding source, the City has applied for FEMA ~tigation funding for this project. That reques~ is pending. We look forward to your favorable consideration of our funding request. z:bi]l~lI 1149~Toul~glax.&~g Dr. Richard L. Woodruff// City Manager ' * AGENDA ~M J .N 2 8 1997 Pg..__// FACSIMILE (941) 434.4620 TELEPHONE (941) 434-4610 SUNCOM 974-4610 735 EIGHTH STREET. SOUTH ,, NAPLES. FLORIDA 34102-6796 Collier County Tourist Developmen= Council GRA~T APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance (Beach i~rovement, maintenance renourishmen=, restoration and erosion control, including pass and inlet ~aintenance) Completed applications must be received ac =he below address no 1acer than S:00 P.M. firsn Monday in Nove~oer Administrator Collier County Tourist Developmen= Council County Manager's Office 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, F~ 33962 Name and address of Applicant Organi=atlon: City of Naples 735 8th Sc. S. Naples, Florida 34102 ConTac= Person, Title and Phone Number: William P. Harrison, Assistant City Mana~ (941) 434-4610 Organization's Chief Official and Title: Bill Barnett, Mayor Brief Project Description: Rebuild the outer half of the historic Naples on the inner half of the ~ier. AGENDAITEM No. £~ .,/ JAN 2 8 Igg7 Collier County Tourian Developmen~ Coun¢£1 Grant Application 2 6. 7. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. £s~imaced project start dace: £s:ima:ed Project duration: To=al amount requested: Months ~Over three--ars If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? Yes No X d~ '~, ooa v C ' The Naples Pier has been a landmark enid b_ky_koth our citizens and visitors for over one hundred years. Rebuildin~ w~}l'p_rovi~e for,the..continued/safe enjoyment of the facilities. ~at b n s w · v ~om h ~ 4cc : Rebuildt~o the standards of the inner half will provide hazard mitigation and s~reduce the chance of service interruptions from storms. ~S e~ r ~ t wi be evaluated- £ffectivenesa evaluated b com 1erin the project at or below bu~ithin~cted construction ~and withh__.~.h!gh, construct~ escrfbe how t o nha ~ v our Der lo men A well constructed and maintained Na les Pier will continue to be a to tourist s r'be h w' a c w be mon ~ r d- e will be ub ect to all standard ~ment controls of the AGENDA I~M No.__f XL_ JAN 2 8 lg97 Pg._ /. Collier County Tourist Development Council Gramt Application Page 3 14. Please complete the followingquestions and provide additional information if necessary. Does the proposed expenditure further =he objectives outlined in =he Mission Statement? Yes C X) No C ) Does =he proposed expenditure fairly disnribu=e monies different geographic areas of the County? Yes ( ) No ¢ X) Does the proposed expenditure promote environmental awareness and understanding and does a proposed projec= address environmental considera=£ons? Yes ¢ X) No C ) Is =he proposed project part of =he ongoing Collier beach res=ora=ion project and/or pass maintenance/dredging/management projects? Yes ( ) No (X) Is the proposed project required by a regula:ory agency as a condition for approval/funding =he Collier County beach res=oration projects? Yes ( ) No (X) Will the proposed project contribute significantly to the progress of the beach restoration projects? Yes ( ) No (X) Will the project decrease ~he local cost share of an overall beach restoration project, either by decreasing the total project cost or by increasing the local/~on-local ratio? Yes ( ) No C X) will the project improve understanding of a!:ernative technologies that may contribute to a cos:-effec=ive beach res=oration project? Yes { ) No (X) AGENDA ITEM k' JAN 2 8 1997 PP, ..... ~ ..... , ,- Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Appl£cac£on ~age 4 Is there a potential for an alterna=ive/macch£ng funding source? Yes eX) ~o ( ) . . - See attached letter Is the project consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and/or standing Board of County Co~missioners action? Yes (X) No { } Has the proJecC been reviewed ~J~d recommended b~ the Beach Renourishmenc/Maintenance Advisoz~fComm/ctee? Yes ( ) ~o ( I have read the Beach Renourishmen= and Pass Guidel~nes and criteria and agree =ha= my ~~.1,/~ all guidelines and criteria. ~,%L~'nature of_Organ~za=~on's Chief Official ~ AGENDA ITI~M No. JAN 2 8 1997 Cons:ruction Design $~10o000 $ 40,000 $410,000 $ 40,000 TOTAl., $450,000 AGENDA ITEM No. .~x- z~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REVIEW OF 5 YEAR NON-CIE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OBJECTIVE= BCC review of the Five Year non-CIE Capital Improvement Plan, which is funded principally by General Fund ad valorem taxes. In addition, policy direction from the Board is needed regarding alternatives to balancing the plan. CONSIDERATIONS~ On an annual basis, non-CIE capital project requests exceed the available pool of General Fund ad valorem taxes allocated to capital projects. In response, as part of the adopted FY 97 budget policy, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to develop a Five Year non-CIE Capital Improvement Plan for projects funded by a transfer of General Fund ad valorem taxes. Staff has compiled a list of requested capital projects for the period from FY 97 through FY 01 in the following categories: Government Facilities, Public Safety, Library, Parks and Recreation, Airport Authority, Stormwater Management, and the Museum. The non-CIE capital projects approved in the FY 97 budget process serve as the first year of the proposed plan. It is important to note that the plan as presented excludes funding for the County Jail expansion and the Immokalee Jail Center pending determination of an appropriate revenue source(s). As indicated previously, the principal revenue source for non-CIE capital projects is a transfer from the General Fund. In FY 97, the General Fund had an available pool of $5,505,700 allocated for capital projects. In recognition of construction inflation and total project requests exceeding available revenues, staff is recommending a 4% annual increase in the total ad valorem dollars allocated for capital projects. (Note: This increase in General Fund support of capital projects will be addressed in the 3 year analysis of ad valorem tax supported funds). Even after including the 4% growth factor in General Fund dollars allocated to capital projects, there is an overall shortfall of $10,463,600 for the period from FY 97 through FY 01. (See attached project summary). Staff feels it is important to inform the Board of all project requests, prior to seeking direction regarding alternatives to balance the plan. This shortfall does not include a list of additional Sheriff's Office requests that were received on Friday, January 17, 1997. Many of these projects represent short-term capital needs that would have otherwise been addressed had the Jail sales tax referendum been approved by the voters. These projects represent an additional $7,740,000 exclusive of the Jail expansion and Immokalee Jail projects. If the $7,740,000 in additional pro~j~l£M is included, the projected shortfall for the period from No. ~ ~ ~) JAN 2 8 1997 Pg. ! FY 97 - FY 01 will increase to $18,203,600. There are a number of alternatives available to balance this five year non-CIE capital plan. These include: increasing the General Fund ad valorem tax dollars allocated to capital projects, phasing or deferring specific projects to coincide with the available revenue stream, utilization of short-term borrowing mechanisms such as the Commercial Paper program, or a combination of the above. Staff is seeking BCC direction regarding the alternatives available to balance this plan. FISCAL M__~: The non-CIE capital plan, as presented, assumes a 4% anrual increase in the General Fund subsidy in FY 98 FY 01. This includes a General Fund subsidy of $5,725,900 in FY 98, representing a $220,200 increase above the FY 97 level. Unless the available pool of General Fund dollars allocated to capital projects is increased, projects would have to either be deferred or eliminated. None. ~: That the Board of County Commissioners review the 5 Year non-CIE Capital Improvement Plan and provide policy direction regarding balancing the plan. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: Michael R. Smykowski, OMB Director W. Neil Dorrill, County Manager DATE: /-2/-~2 DATE: AGENDA ITEM No. JAN 2 8 1997 Pg.. JAN 2 8 1997 Z ~ ~I~NDA IT E No. ~: [ JAN 2 8 199~ Z ~ ~(3£ND^ I', ::vi JAN 2 8 ~.:. ~,~.__/.o _ COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROJECT LIST COUNTY FUND 381 PRDSECT NAME FY 1998 FY 1999 FY E00B FY~801 SUBTOTAL HAPLES JAIL EXPANSION NEW IMMOKALEE JAIL SUBTOTAL PROJECTS NEEDED FOR JAIL: NAPLES JAIL KITCHEN/LAUNDRY 150,000 NAPLES JAIL ELECTRONIC PANELS UPGRADE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS )NE & DATA LINES UPGRADE SUBTOTAL 25,080,000 OR UNTIL COMPLETION 150,000 2,000,000 OR UNTIL COMPLETION $25,1~B,000 $2,000,000 $690,000 108,000 48,080 $140,000 SP, 150,0~ $27,150:0~ $158,0~ $100,B( $80,BB $590,B~ OTHER PROJECTS NEEDED: E. NAPLES, GG, N. HAPLES SUBSTATION EXPANSIONS YEAR 2000 SOFTWARE ORANGETREE SUBSTATION JAIL VIDEO IMAGING MOBIL DIGITAL TERMINALS PC REPLACEMENT FOR EOUIP OVER lB YEARS OLD SUBTOTAL 500,000 1,000,000 1,000,800 590,000 290,000 10,000 300,000 1,200,000 1,000,009 $3,500,B~ 300,000 390,900 390,090 100,090 1BO, BBB 100,000 $1,410,800 $1,690,009 $2,600,000 $700,9~ $1,E09, B~ $10,0~ $1,290,B~ $1,309,999 $300,0( $6,910,0( GRAND TOTAL $27,250,000 $3,740,000 TE: THE HEED FOR A NEW FLEET FACILITY STILL EXISTS. $2,690,000 $1,3BB,OBB $3A,890,B( AGENDA !'L * '- No. k [5 ). JAN 2 8 Pg.__../! .. ~PPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY 2OMMITI'EE - OBJECTIVE: To appoint 1 member to serve 2 year term, expiring on February 4, 1999, and appoint I member to fulfill the remainder of the vacant term, expiring on February 4, 1998, on the County Government Productivity Committee. CONSIDERATIONS: This 13 member committee reviews the efficiency of departments of County Government under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners. Terms are 2 years. A list of the current membership is included in the backup. The term for James E. Cavanagh will expire on February 4, 1997 and a letter ofresigrmtion was received from Marc Germer on November 4, 1996. The term vacated by Mr. Gertner will expire on February 4, 1998. A press release was issued and resumes were received bom the following 2 interested citizens: APPLICANT DISTRICT ELECTOR Edward V. Ott (Attorney) I yes John R. Schoemer (Accountant/Businessman) 2 yes RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENT: Edward V. OR - 02/04/98 John R. Schoemer - 02/04/99 FISCAL IMPACT: NONE GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the recommendation for appointment and appoint 2 members to the County Government Productivity Committee, and direct the County attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the appointments. Prepared By: Sue Filson Date: January 28, 1997 AGENDA ~I~/.~EM - JAN 2 8 1997 County Government Productivity Committee Ntork Phone ,4ppt'd Exp. Date Term Home Phone DateRe-a'pgt 2ndF.~Date 2nd Term 07/16/96 02/04/97 1 Year SgS-l~O I/7/97 02/04/99 2 Year~ 77~091 01/07/97 01106/98 I Year Charles E. Getler 6855 San Marino Drive Naples, FL 34108 District: 2 Category: Bu~ess Man~ement Barbara B. Berry 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 District: 5 Category: BCC Vice C~ Daivd R. Craig 3106 N. Tam;~ml Trail #261 Naples, FL 34103 District: 4 Category: Business Management Robert D. Laird 1765 Courtyard Way, #205-C Naples, FL 34112 District: 1 Category: Real Esxate/In.nurance 261-2624 02/02/93 02/04/95 2 years 1/7/97 02/04/99 2 Years Karl $ Otto 693 Seaview Ct., SSE A-704 Marco Island, FL 34145 District: 1 Category: Retired Engineer 07/16/96 02/04/97 I Year 793-0933 1/7/97 02/04/99 2 Years 11/07/95 02/04/96 3 Mo. 642-3798 11/7/95 02/04/98 2 Years Edward T. Ferguson 215 Silver'ado Drive Naples, FL 34119 District: 3 Category: Business Mgmt/Educa. tion I 1654 Quail VillageWay 597-54~19 Naples, FL 34119 Distn'ct: 5 Category: Attorney 02;28195 02/04197 2 Years I/7/97 02/04199 2 Years 03/26196 02/04/98 2 Years AGEN[ JAN 2 8 1997 Po. County G0vern'ment Productivity Committee Name Bernard L. Weiss 13455 Pond Apple Drive Naples, FL 34119 D~tr~c~: 5 Category: Retired General Robln Maretta 1780 Watson Road Marco Island, FL 34145 District: Category: Law F. aforccmeat Joha E. Stock'ton 2230 Royal Lane Naples, FL 34112 Distn'ct: Category: Retired Busiacssmau Bill L. Neal 3536 Windjamm~ Eircle #50 Naples, FL 34112 District: 5 Category: Reared Businessman .tack (3. McKenaa 107 Flame Vine Drive Naples, FL 341 District: 2 Category: Engineer James £~ Cavanash 3870 Midshore Drive Naples, FL 34109 District: Category: Admini~tion ~Fork Phone Appt'd F. xp. Date Term Home Phone DateRe-appt 2nd~'.xpDate 2nd Term 03/26/96 02/04/98 2 Years 694-7772 01/07/97 02/04/99 389-9252 1 II07/95 02/04/96 774..0~2 1 I/7/95 02/04/98 11/07/95 02/04/96 774-6325 1 I/7/95 02/04/98 597-3111 03/08/94 02/04/96 597°1596 2/26/96 02/04/98 10/03/95 02/04/97 591-3362 2 Years 2 Mo. 2 Years 3 Mo. 2 Years 2 Yem'~ 2 Yeax~ I Yeax / ~Fednoday, J~u~&'y O& 1997 JAN 2 8 1997 County Government Productivity Committee tFork Pttone ~4ppt'd Exp. Date 7'erin ttomt Phone DateRe-appt 2ncLE. rpDate 2nd Term This 13 member committee was created on 01/20/91 by Ord. No. 9%10 (amended by Ord. No. 93-13 & 96-10) to review the efficiency of deparlznenla of County Government under the jurisdi~on of the BCC. Terms are 2 year~. Staff; She~ Leith, Budget Analyst: 774-8578 JAN 2 8 1997 MEMORANDUM , .. TO: FROM: SUE FILSON, ADMINISTKATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMN~SSIONERS //~ SHEILA LEITH, BUDGET ANALYST II, & STAFF LIASON TO THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY COMMITTEE PRODUCTIVITY COMMITTEE VACANCIES DATE: JANUARY 16, 1997 There are currently 2 vacancies on the County Government Productivity Committee. The Committee h~s received 2 resumes for consideration. AppLicants were categorized ~s follows: Edwazd V. Ott 5912 Cranbrook W~y H-206 Naples, FL 34112 Attorney John R. Schoemer 501 The Dorchester 6075 PeLican Bay Boulevard Naples, FL 34108 Accountant/Businessman The Productivity Committee is recommending that the Board of County Commissioners appoint these candidates to £dl the current vacancies. Thank you for your ass~ance. Please call if you have any questions. AN 2 8 19S7 MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: January 13, 1997 Vi_nell Hills, Elections Oftice Sue Filson, Ad~nlstrative Assi~. Board of County Commissioners RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointm~ts The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are registered voters ia Collier County. Also, please list the commission district ia which each applicant resides. COUNTY GOVT PRODUCTIVITY COMM COMMISSION DISTRICT Edward V. Ott 5912 Cranbrook Way H-206 Naples, FL 34112 John R. Schoemer 501 The Dorchester 6075 Pelican Bay Boulevard Naples, FL 34108 Thank you for your help. llo.~ JAN 2 B 1997 DATE: TO: FROM: January 13, 1997 Sheila Leith, Budget Analyst . ,~. Sue Filsoa, Administrative Asststm~ ' Board of County Commissioners ~ ' County Government Productivity Committee As you know, we currently have vacancies on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press release was issued reques'd.ng ¢itize~ intere~ed in ~rving on tiffs committee to submit a resume for consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows: Edward V. Ott 5912 Cranbrook Way H-206 Naples, FL 34112 John R. Schoemer 501 The Dorchester 6075 Pelican Bay Boulevard Naples, FL 34108 Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation of the advisory committee for appointment and I will prepare an executive ~tmmary for the Board's consideration. Please categorize the applicanU ~a area~ of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me'at 774-8097. Thank you for your attention to this matter. SF Attachments January. 6, 1997 EDWARD V. OTT 5912 CRANBROOK WAY H-206 NAPLES, FL 34112 [9,,11775-0968 Ms. Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of Count~ CommiSsioners 3301 US 41 East Naples, FL 34112 Re: Vacancy on the County. Government Productivity Committee Dear Ms. Filson: Please accept this letter a.s my application for consideration to the above.mentioned committee. I am applying because I feel there is more to life after retirement th~ playing at golf. Briefly: 1989. Name: Edward V. Ott Residence: 5912 Cranbrook Way H-206 Naples, FL 34112 Telephone: [94 I] 775-0968 Wife's name: Patricia Resident: Permanent since 1991; part-time since 1984; property owner since 1980. I retired from my law practice in 1987 and from the Michigan Bar Association in Attached is a brief resume of my work experience. Very truly yours, encl. JAN 2 8 1997 Pg .-.-~-~ L RESUME EDWARD V. OTT OCCUPATION: Retired ,~)DRESS: MARITAL STATUS: 5912 Cranbrook Way H-206 Naples, FL 34112 [941] 775-0968 Married EDUCATION: J.D. Law, Detroit College of Law L.L.D. Law, Detroit College of Law Undergraduate, Detroit Institute of Technology. MILITARY: GENERAL EXPERIENCE: Retired 1st. Lt., AUS Arbitration Attorney, with specialty, in labor law Mgr. Industrial Relations, Allied Products Labor Relations Manager, Studebaker-Packard Div. Supervisor, Personnel & Labor'Relat'iS~, Ford Motor Federal Attorney, Veteran's Affairs AGENDA I~4_ No._ JAN 2 8 1997 Pg._ q - JOHN R. $CHOEMER S01 The Dorchester 6075 Pelican Bay Boulevard Naples, lqorlda 34105 (941) $66=2483 J'anuary 2, 1997 Ms. Sue Fiison Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners 3301 U.S. 41 East Naples. FL 34112 Dear Ms. Filson: I saw the notice in the Daily News that the County Commission is seeking applicants for positions on The Coumy Government Productivity Committee. I believe that I would be a good candidate for this Committee, and would like very much to serve on it. I am semi-retired and have recently become a legal resident &Naples. My background as an accountant and partner with Arthur Andersen & Co., one of the largest accounting firms in the world, and currently as a director of several companies would work well with this committee. I have spent my entire career assisting companies, not-for-profits, and governmental units in managing their costs and operations. Attached is my resume which gives my employment history in greater detail. Please let me know if there is anything further I can do to assist this process further. /~/~Sincerely. /7 AGENDA LTEH JAN 2 8 lgg? JOHN R. SCHOEMER ~01 The Dorchester 6075 Pelican Bay Boulevard Naples, Florida 34 ! 08 941-566..248.3 ard i e ' c E-Z Serve Corp (AMEX) 1993-present $700 million convenience store and gasoline station operator Member or' Audit and Compensation Committees Active participant in acquisitions strategy and implementation Metal Powder Products Company (Private) 1992-present S35 million metals processor Member of'Audit and Compensation committees Directed recent recapitalization and refinancing Flomet Corp (Private) 1993-present 5;6 million metals processor ,. Member of' Audit Committee Active participant in development of'marketing and growth strategies Cambric Corporation 1996-present 5;6 million start up software venture Chairman of'Executive Committee Active oversight ot'management and strategy Direct marketing and growth strategies Member of'Audit and Compensation Committees COO NAR Group Ltd. and Quadrant Management Inc., NYC 1991-Present NAR is offshore investment joint venture which controls Hano, ver Direct QMI is U.S, management company · Installed financial reporting and communication policies ~th joint venture partners that ended existing fi'iction and distrust over results · Negotiated and supervised sale of'investment oil refinery · Supervised operation and eventual s~le of European subsidia~es · Active management of subsidiary and investment companies EV'P Hanover Direct, Weehawken, NJ ! 993-1995 AMEX direct marketer with stable of 15 catalogs · Strategized, negotiated and integrated acquisition of'Company Store catalog out ofbankruptcy · In first year ~rned $6 million EBIT on $55 million volume · Created, developed and marketed new wholesale line to complement existing line for captive factory operation · Installed or updated all new procedures in factory, iq ~ personnel, cost accounting, quality control and t~ni tg No..~ JAN 2 8 1997 -2- EVP Hanover Direct, Weehawken, NJ (Continued) . Strategized and negotiated acquisition of'Gump's catalog and landmark retail store in San Francisco · Managed transition and installation of'new company-wide on-line computer system, including operating as interim head of'MIS department COO Tiger Direct, Inc.. Miami FL February-July 1995 Public company in direct marketing of'computers · As CO0 of'fast growing but unprofitable catalog computer marketer. developed and installed procedures, controls, qualified personnel and disciplines to become profitable · Assignment ended when Hanover Direm terminated plans for equity investment CFO National Football League and World League ; ' 1984-1991 · Supervised all financial and computer operations of'League O~ce · Served as League representative on Owners' Finance Committee Member of'governing boards of Player and Executive Pension Plans · Member of'founding group of World League (international football) Partner Arthur Andersen & Co., NYC 1974-1984 · Partner in charge oflargest audit division in New York ofiqce · Engagement responsibility for major clients, including Merck, American Home Products, Marsh & McLennan, Colgate, NFL, New York Giants. Bantam Books, Arista Records · Member o£numerous national committees addressing. Grmwlde issues o Accountant, Arthur Andersen & Co., NYC 1962-I968, 1972-1974 Controller, Filmways Inc,, NYC 1968-1972 AMEX producer of'films and tele~sion series MBA,'Rutgers University, 1962 AB, Hamilton College, 1961 CPA. New York. 1965 AGENDb ~ T E4't JAN 2 8 Pg ..~~ SENT BY:CC HOUSINO AUTHORITY ; 1-21-97 ;10:28A~1 ; CCHA"' 9417744010;# 1 THE LAKE TRAFFORD RESTORATION TASK FORCE January 24, 1997 Nell Dorr~ County Manager Collier County Government Center 3301 East Tamiami Tra/I Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Neff: As the Chainnan of the Lake Trafford Restoration Task Force I am pleased to announce that our task force mmnbers have located some f'tmding under the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Critical Restoration Program. This is a 50% matching program. Th~ Florida Department of Environmental Program (FDEP) has taken the lead to apply for fi. rods for the restoration of Lake Tr~Yord. Our project has passed two cuts and comes up for review again on February 4th in West Palm Beach. To support this application, the task force .would appreciate the following: I. That the Board of County Commissioners officially endorse the application. 2. 'l'hat the Board of County Commissioners allow Staff to serve as the facilitators for raising matching funds, most of which will come fi.om various State agencies. 3. Serve as the applicant for the dredging permits. This will allow all fees to be waived by the StaTe. 4. Allow Dr. Ga~l Gibson to attend the presentation meeting in Palm Beach County on the 4th of February to support FDEP staff in their presentation of our project. Attached please find a copy of FDEP's face page to the application. You will notice on the top, a break-out of funds appropriated to data on this project. Because of the persons that serve on our task force we were able, without cost to the county or lask force, to receive goods and services in the amount of $100,000, to defray the cost of preparing the dredging permit and this gram application. Of that $I00,000, $30,000 is in-kind already received becau.-.e of county ~affs efforts. You will note on thc attached f~ tl'~t ~ of this i,,~rmation has just been released, therefore, 1 was unable to get it to you in a timel7 mmn~ for expeditious approw. L However, I iclnda wanna ask you to work ya magt¢ and make this an add-on for next Tuesday. But, understanding the real world, it might be appropriate to reques~ placing it as an add-on to the February 4th agenda, early SENT. BY:CC HOU$INB AUTHORITY ; 1-21-91 ; CCHA- 9t~77tt010;~ 2 eaough for us to fax the County's s~port in.~orrnadon to our team in PaLm Beac~ by 10 AM on February 4th. If you sre a~le to ~ m~.g~c, al, ~e w~le world ~ know how appreciative we are. Thank you v~ry much for your continued support. Sincerely, Fred N. Thomas, Jr. Ctaim~ B~rbara Berry, Vice Chairmm Timothy Hancock, Chairman Pamela MacKie $ohn Norris Timothy Constantine TO .: P.g2 ~i ]~ ~ng p . me~ ~ a long.. . ,' :.:. . . ,j ... EXECUTIVE SUMMAry PETITION NUMBER: PUD-81-30 (1), PETER L. BRETON, REPRESENTING MANOR CARE OF BOYNTON BEACH, INC., REQUESTING TO A/~END THE LELY PALMS OF NAPLES PUD DOCUMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF REPLACING FIFTY (50) OF THE APPROVED "FUTURE RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS" WITH 50 ASSISTED LIVING UNITS WITH A COMMON KITCHEN FACILITY SERVING THE 50 ALF UNITS AND TO ADD AN ADULT DAY CARE FACILITY. THE PETITIONER iS ALSO REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE SETBACK ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY BOUNDARY FROM 30 FEET TO 20 FEET AND TO REVISE THE MASTER PI2~N TO REFLECT THE CHANGES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD (CR-864) IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST. ~ This petition seeks to rezone the subject property from PUD to PUD to amend the Lely Palms of Naples Planned Unit Development (PUD) as noted above. CONSIDERATION~ Lely Palms of Naples PUD comprises approximately 23.5 acres and is approved for 296 independent residential apartment dwelling units of which 12 units are designated as congregate assistive care or (ALF). The PUD also allows for 120 nursing care beds. The proposed amendment to shift 50 residential apartments into assisted living units will allow for greater flexibility in meeting the residents changing lifestyle needs. As a result of this change, the PUD will allow for 234 residential apartments, 62 assisted living units and 120 private or semiprivate nursing care beds. In this way, residents who can no longer live independently but do not require skilled nursing care will have an on site assisted care option. Currently, the project is nearly completed and contains two - three story residential apartment buildings containing 200 units, 34 villa units and 12 assisted living units. It also has a health center with 120 beds and a one story commons area that has also been completed. This represents 246 units of the approved 296 units allowed by this PUD. The remaining future 50 apartments are proposed to be developed as 50 assisted living units. The subject property is designated Urban Mixed Use (Urban Residential Subdistrict) on the Future Land Use Map and Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan. .The density for an assisted living facility is 26 units per acre in this area. The proposed 50 additional ALF units results in 2.7 units per acre. The overall project has been developed at approximately 10 units per acre. Since the proposed amendment does not authorize any additional independent dwelling units over the amount currently approved, this petition is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. 1 AGENDA M JAN 2, 8 1997 P~. _ / The Traffic Impact Review indicates that the proposed amendment will reduce the site generated trips versus the trips that could be generated by the currently approved project. As a result, the amendment doesn't exceed the significance test for Rattlesnake Hammock Road and is considered consistent with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Traffic Circulation Element (TCE). This is a PUD amendment even though the process is one of rezoning the land from "PUD to PUD". The intent is to achieve a level of administrative convenience because it avoids the requirement to track amendments and their relationship to the original document in order to understand the totality of the regulations as they apply to the PUD zoning district. For this reason staff is of the opinion that the required findings for standard and PUD rezones do not apply in recognition of the fact that when the property was initially rezoned the decision to approve the subject PUD was based upon a preponderance of evidence and conditions which supported the required findings for PUD rezoning actions. The petitioner is also requesting to reduce the setback distance from 30 feet to 20 feet only along the eastern boundary. Since this property line abuts a preserve tract in the adjacent Lely Resort PUD, no residential structures will be affected. The only structure involved will be the 120 bed Health Center. The balance of the project is built-out along the eastern side. Based on the above referenced analysis, staff is of the opinion that this amendment will not adversely impact any level of service standard. The Collier County Planning Commission reviewed this petition on January 2, 1997 and recommended approval by a 7 to 0 vote. FISCAL IMPACT: This amendment by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on the County. However, if this amendment achieves its objective, the land will be developed. The mere fact that new development has been approved will result in a future fiscal impact on County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help off-set the impact of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects in the Capital Improvement Element needed to maintain adopted levels of service for public facilities. In the event that impact fee collections are inadequate to maintain adopted levels of service, the County must provide supplemental funds from other revenue sources in order to build the needed facilities. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ~MPACT~ Approval of this amendment to the Lely Palms of Naples PUD does nothing to change the original development in terms of the density/intensity of development. The subject property is located within the Urban/Residential area as designated on the Future Land Use Map. Therefore the proposed chan~e is consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Grow~-n M t JAN 8 1997 That the Board of County Commissioners approve Petition PUD-S1-30 (1) as described by the Ordinance of Adoption and made part of this Executive Summary. PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: ~ICP DONALD W. ARNOLD, AICP PLANNING SERVICES DLRECTOR /5..~._~.. 1~ / ' INCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINIST~TOR COMITY D~. ~D ~IRO~ENTAL SVCS. RVB/rb/EXSUMMARY /-__~7 DATE DATE DATE 3 AGENDA~T~I~ ~ JAN 2 8 1997 AGENDA ITEM TO= FROM~ DATE: AaENT/~PLICANT~ Agent: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COM/47JNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION DECEMBER 12, 1996 PETITION NO: PUD-81-30 (1) LELY PALMS OF NAPLES PUD Applicant: Peter Breton Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Kolins, Raymond & Sheehan, P.A. 625 N. Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Manor Care of Boynton Beach, Inc. (Lessee) 10770 Columbia Pike Silver Springs, MD 20901 The subject property is located on the south side of Rattlesnake Hammock Road (CR-864) in Section 21, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. (See illustration following page) E US ED C ON: The petitioner is requesting a rezone from PUD to PUD to amend the Lely Palms of Naples Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of replacing fifty (50) of the approved "future residential apartments" with 50 assisted living units with a common kitchen facility serving the 50 assisted living units and to add an adult day care facility. The petitioner is also requesting to change the setback along the east property boundary from 30 feet to 20 feet and to revise the Master Plan to reflect the changes. PURPOSE D S ON O O' = Lely Palms of Naples Pm comprises approximately 23.5 acres and is approved for 296 independent residential apartment dwelling wits of which 12 units are designated as congregate assistive care or (~F). The PUD also allows for 120 nursing care beds. The proposed ~endment to shift 50 residential apartments into assisted living units will allow for greater flexibility in meeting the residents changing ~lifestyle needs. As a result of this change, the PUD will allow for 234 .¥Jresidential apartments, 62 assisted living units and 120 ~1 --1-- m ,D -- AGEN DA,4TEI~ %. .JAN 2 8, ~997 beds. In this way, residents who can no longer live independently but do not require skilled nursing care will have an on site assisted care option. Currently, the project is nearly completed and contains two - three story residential apartment buildings containing 200 units, 34 villa units and 12 assisted living units. It also has a health center with 120 beds and a one story commons area that has also been completed. This represents 246 units of the appro~,ed 296 units allowed by this PUD. The remaining future 50 apartments are proposed to be developed as 50 assisted living units. Existing Conditions: The development is mostly developed and is zoned PUD. Surrounding: North - Rattlesnake-Hammock Road~ Zoned: "A". East - Residential~ Zoned "Lely Country Club PUD". South - Residential and vacant land; Zoned "PUD". West - Residential; Zoned: "PUD". GRO M~-%rA NT O This petition has been reviewed by the appropriate staff for compliance with the applicable elements of the GMP, as noted below: ~ The subject property is designated Urban Mixed Use (Urban Residential Subdistrict) on the Future Land Use Map and Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan. The density for an assisted living facility is 26 units per acre in this area. The proposed 50 additional ALF units results in 2.7 units per acre. The overall project has been developed at approximately 10 units per acre. Since the proposed amendment does not authorize any additional independent dwelling units over the amount currently approved, this petition is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. . a 'c C' u t o e · The Traffic Impact Review indicates that the proposed amendment will reduce the site generated trips versus the trips that could be generated by the currently approved project. The switch from the 50 independent living apartments to 50 assisted living units will reduce the site generated traffic by approximately 250 trips per day. As a result, the-amendment doesn't exceed the significance test for Rattlesnake-Hammock Road and is considered consistent with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Traffic Circulation Element (TCE). 'c ble m s' Staff review indicates that this petition has been designed to account for the necessary relationships dictated by the Gro%~ah Management Plan. Where appropriate mitigation measures and stipulations have been generated to ensure consistency with GMP during the permitting process. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under of Section 3.15 of the Collier County Land Development -2- JAN 2 8 1997 Public Facilities, at the earliest or next to occur of either Final SDP approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. Therefore, the proposed PUD amendment is consistent with the GMP. Staff has concluded that no level of service standards will be adversely affected by this amendment. Appropriate mitigation measures and stipulations will assure that the County's interests are maintained. Consistency with the goals, objectives and policies of other applicable elements of the GMP and level of service relationships are to be achieved by stipulations and/or development commitments made a part of the approval of this development order. Development permitted by this project is subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance as contained in Division 3.15 of the Land Development Code at the earliest or next to occur of either final SDP approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance. As a result, this petition is deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. ~vALU~TION FOR ENVIRON~ENT~L, TRANSPORTATION ~RD INFRASTRUCTURE= This peri=ion was referred to all appropriate County agencies for their review. Since no level of service standards will be adversely affected by this amendment, these agencies have recommended approval subject to appropriate stipulations that are consistent with the LDC. The Transportation staff has no comment concerning this amendment. This is a PUD amendment even though the process is one of rezoning the land from "PUD to PUD". The intent is to achieve a level of administrative convenience because it avoids the requirement to track amendments and their relationship to the original document in order to understand the totality of the regulations as they apply to ~he PUD zoning district. For this reason staff is of the opinion that the required findings for standard and PUD rezones do not apply in recognition of the fact that when the property was initially rezoned the decision to approve the subject PUD was based upon a preponderance of evidence and conditions which supported the required findings for PUD rezoning actions. Because of the proposed changes and a building addition, the petitioner is requesting to reduce the setback distance from 30 feet to twenty feet only along the eastern boundary. This property line abuts a preserve tract in the Lely Resort PUD, so no residential structures will be affected. The only structure involved will be the 120 bed Health Center, since the balance of the project is built-out along the eastern side. JAN 2, 8 1997 Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PUD-81-30 (1) to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval. PREPARED BY: PRO~EC~ DATE REVIEWED BY: ~Yo~%RF~T PLANNING SERVICES MANAGER DATE DATE Staff Report for January 2, 1997 CCPC meeting. NOTE: This Petition has been advertised for the January 28, 1997. BCC meeting. COLLI ER COUNTY P~~ COMMISSION: MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN RVB/rb/STAFF REPORT/PUD-81-30 (1) -4- JAN 2 8 1997 PETITION NUKB~ DATE APPLICATION ~OR PUBLIC RT.%RING FOR PUD AMZNDMENT/DO AMENDMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPKE~T DMSION PLANNING SERVICES Name of Applicant(s) MANOR CARE OF BOYNTON BEACH, INC. Applicant's ~ailing Address 10770 Columbia Pike city Silver S ri~ State MD zip 20901 Applicant's Telephone Number: Res.: Bus.:301-681-9400 Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? Yes _____X__No .... (a) If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name beneficiaries below. (b) If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders below. X (c) If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate and name principals below. (d) If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, if any. (e) If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and. indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. (f) If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of -- contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address below. OWNER: NAPLES RETIREMENT, INC. (If space l~nadequate,-~ach on separate page.) Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, 2. Name of Agent Peter L. Bret--.Firm Kolins Ra ond & Sheehan, P.A Agents Mailing Address 625 N. Fla~ Ninth Floor AG£ND~*IT£M% City West ~ State ~ zip 33 Telephone Nuunber: Res.: Bus.: 561-659 1997 4. DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THE APPLICATION (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page. If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal description for property involved in each district. If property is odd-shaped, submit five (5) copies of survey (1" to 400' scale). PUD ORDINANCE NAME AND NUHBER: ~_~ Palms of Naples P.U.D. Ord. No. ! THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPLYING THE CORRECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION. IF QUESTIONS ARISE CONCERNING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AN ENGINe_ER ' S CERTIFICATION SHALL BE REQUIRED. SECTION 21 TOWNS~IP ~ R~GE ~~ SEE ATTACHMENT'1 Address or location of subject property 1000_______Lely Palms Drive, Naoles, Florida 33962 Does property owner own contiguous property to the subject property? If so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property· (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page)· o ' ' v Countr Club Tan w .... lat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 114, Public Records of Collier Count Florida. TYPE OF AMENDMENT: X A PUD Document Language Amendment X B. PUD Master Plan Amendment C. Development Order Language Amendment DOES AMENDMENT COMPLY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: No If no, explain: X Yes HAS A PUBLIC HEARING BEEN HELD ON THIS PROPERTY WITHIN THE LAST YEAR? IF SO, IN WHOSE NAME? Not to aoolicant's knowledge. PETITION $: DATE: JAN 8 1997 HAS ANY PORTION OF THE PUD BEEN _~ SOLD AND/OR_.y_es DEVELOPED? ARE ANY CHANGES PROPOSED FOR TH~ AREA SOLD AND-7~ DEVELOPED? __~__Yes. No. IF YES, DESCRIBE: (ATTACH ADDITIONAJ~ SHEETS IF NECESSARY). SEE ATTACHM£NT_~2 We, , ~ ~ being first duly sworn, depose and say that we are the ew~e=s*of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, and all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We understand this application must be completed and accurate before a hearing can be advertised. We further permit the undersigned to act as our representative in any matters regarding this Petition. *Lessee · NOTE: S IGNAT~q~ZS OF ALL OWNERS ARE MANDAT~ / /~ SIGNATUP~E OF OWqqER ~~' County of ~ ~~  .,The .foregoing Application was6ackno~edged be.~ore me this personally known to ~e or who has produce as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. (Print Name of Notary Pu--~) NOTARY PUBLIC Serial/Commission fl My Commission Expires: JAN g 8 1997 090695-1 4070B AGENT'S AUTHORIZATION Manor Care of Boynton Beach, Inc., hereby authorizes and appoints MOYLE, FLANIGAN, KATZ, FITZGERALD & SHEEHAN, P.A. ("Moyle, Flanigan") to act in its behalf and represent it in all matters pertaining to application for a PUD amendment pertaining to the property described on Exhibit "A". It further authorizes Moyle, Flanigan to act as its exclusive agent and to execute any and all documents required to obtain the foregoing approval. Moyle, Flanigan is further authorized to agree to any and all conditions of approval or modifications thereto which may be imposed by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. Executed this day of November, 1996 STATE OF~[~FY~ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged ke~ore me this day .9f'~~Z~_____, 1996 by__.4~k~~_~m~____ __ as /'~ ~ ' of Manor Care o~w' Boynton Beach~ a ~corporation, er.sonallknown to me, OR as identificati~-n. (NOTAPY STAMP) Inc. on behalf of the corporation, who is has produced Notary Public Serial (Commission) Number (if any) NOT~Y I'UBUC STATE WILSON- MILLER PLANNEIt$. EN¥11tON~E~T~L CONSULTAN?$. ENGIN£ER$o SUItV£YORS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, CONSTRt;CTION MANAGERS MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Ray Bellows December 13, 1996 Lel)' Manor Care PUD Amendment Enclosed are the ownership documents you requested. I don't believe that they can be any more specific because Manor Care, Inc. is a publicly traded company. Please give me a call if you need any thing further. JAN 2 8 1997 ORD '~ NAt~C~, AN OIII)JNANCE AMI:NDZNG ORDINANCE NUMIIRR 91-]02, TIlE COLIJER COUNTY LAND DEVI~LOPMENT CODE, WIIZCII INCLUDES TIlE COMPREIII:.N~ZVE ZONING R~GU~T~ONS FOR TIlE UN~NCOItI'ORATI:D AR/.:A OF COLI, I ER COUNTY, F~R~DA, DY AMENDTNG TIlE OFF~CZA~ ZONING A~I,AR MAP NIIM~R~D 0~2]N AND BY CIIANC~NG · IIR ~ONIN~ CI,A~IFICA'I'ION I)E~CI~]III.3) IH:Al. I'I~OI'I:WI'Y I.'ltOH "[*UD" TO "PUD" PLANNED Ut~T DEVEI~PMI:NT KNOWtt AS ~E~Y PALMS OF NAI'I,E5, FOR ~CA~D A? 1000 LE~Y PALMS D~ZV~, ZN SE~ZON 21~ TOWNSHZP 50 SOUTH, ~NGE 26 EAST, ICOLLZER COU~TY~ F~R~DA, CO~S~STING OF 23.5 ACRES ~ORE OR LESS; PROV~Dlt~G FOR THE REPEAL OF O~DltJANCE NUMBER 82-25, AS AHEt~DED, THE FORMER LELY PA~S OF NAPLES PUD; AND ~y P~OV~D~IG AN EFFC~VE DATE. WHEREAS, Pctor L. Dro~on, Esquire o£ Moyle, F/an/gan, Xatz, Xoline, Raymond & Sheohan, P.A., representing Manor Care of Boynton Beach, Inc., Petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property; NOW TIIEREFORD DE ~T ORDAINED BY TIlE BOM{D OF COUt~T¥ COMMISSIONERS~ OF COLLIER COUt~TY, FLORIDA; The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property located in Section 2[, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Numbered 0621N, as described in Ordinance Number 91-[02, the Collier County Land Development Code, are hereby emended accordingly. Ordinance Number B2-25, as amended, known as the Lely Palms of Naples PUD, adopted on April 20, [982 by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. -[. JAN 2 8 1997 This Ordinance shall becose effective upon filing vith the Depar~men~ of State. PASSZD A~ DULY ~OPTED by the Board of County Conissioners of Collier Counk~, Florida, this da~ of , 1997. ATTEST: DWZGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLITR COUNTY, FLORIDA APPROVED AS TO FOPJ4 AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY ,~'5~%~ KARJORIE M. STUDENT ASSISTANT COU~TY ATTOP4~EY PUD-S1-30 (1) ORDINANCE/18?65 BY: -2- JAN 2 8 1997 TO APPLICATION FOR PUD AMENDMENT ;75 LELY PALMS OF NAPLES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH RANGE 26 EAST Date Issued~ Approved by CAPC.~.._.3..~ Approved by Ordinance No,.._ Date Issued Approved by CCPC~ Approved by BCC__ OrdinanceNo.__~ ~ J/~N 2 8 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION II STATEMENT OF INTENT SECTION III PROPERTY OWNERSHIP & LEGAL DESCRIPTION SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION V GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS PAGE 1-2 3 4-5 6-7 8-9 AG [ N_D/~, IT[M/\ JAN 2 8 1997 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The purpose of this section is to express the intent of Retirement Corporation of America, P.O. Box 1537, Bradenton, Florida 33506 ~ develop 23.54- acres of land loca~cl in part of Section 21, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The r~me of this proposed development shall henceforth be known as Lely Palms of Naples. The development of the Lely Palms of Naples as a Planned Unit Development will be in compqance wit~ the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. The residential development and recreation and health care facilities will be consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and other applicable documents for the following reasons: State of Florida Statutes Chapter 163.3177 as amended in I980, states that local governments must provide adequate sites for future housing, including housing for low-income and moderate-income families, mobile homes, and group home facilities and fos-~er care facilities, with supporting infrastructure and community facilities, in the local Government's Comprehensive Plan. When the County adopted the Comprehensive Plan on May 8, 1979, this requirement was not taken into consideration of the design of the future land use element as the Local Government's Comprehensive Planning Act was amended in late 1980. Therefore, the present Collier County Comprehensive Plan does not reflect sufficient future sites to guide development of group home facilities and foster care facilities. This project will serve to partially fulfill the County's obligation to provide for health-care facilities associated with residential retirement communities. This project will provide an alternative housing source for residents seeldng retkement shelter. The subject property has the necessary rating points to determine availability of adequate community facilities and services. 4. The project development is'compatible and complimentary to the surrounding land uses. 5. Ail improvements will be in compliance with all applicable regulations. o The project development will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services. 7. The project development will make available housing to meet the special 10. 11. elderly and the retirement commtmity of Collier County and in particular the Greater The project development will. provide n'ansportation by way of bus for residents of the community, thereby, conserving energy ~md minimizing excessive movement of traffic. The project ~'ponsor has filed for Certificate of Need a~d sl~all receive approval from the appropriate agencie~ prior to the iss~,anee of building permits. See Ezhibit "A." The project development will provide health care capability to those patients who require limited life support a~d ~re unable to meet the criteria for hospitalization. The environmentally sensitive ~reas adjacent to the property present natural recreational features beneficial to residents of the retirement and elderly community. AG E N DA.,IT~ M,/~. JAN g 8 1997 SECTION II STATEMENT OF INTENT It is the property owner's intention to commence development of a health-integrated program for a group retirement community which will incorporate a licensed skilled narsing care home facility together with various social, recreational, dining, and medical support facilities, geared to the needs of the retired residents of the project. The l.ely Palms of Naples shall offer a planned program of an alternative way of life for the aging, an alternative which promotes their physical, psychological, and social well-being, in turn, extending their lives. Upon completion of development, the Lely Palms of Naples will contain the following structures and facilities, as shown on the Sitc Plan, WMP&B File No. PZ- 6IA,dated August 28, 1996. 2-3 story residential apartment buildings, each containing a maximum of 125 dwelling units (of which 50 dwelling units shall be used as assisted living units). 12-I story leisure living units (congregate assistive care). 34-I story Multiplex Units with a maximum of 4 units per building. Licensed health center which will contain a maximum of 120 private or semi-private patient rooms, together with medical support and administrative facilities common to skilled nursing care. A commons area containing a kitchen, dining, social, recreational, h'brary, gift-beauty shop, administrative and utilitarian services and facilities for the exclusive use of project residents and invited guests. A chapel. Various outdoor recreational areas and facilities. - A golf-cart/pedestrian/bike path extending throughout the project area. - A project ear wash, laundry and maintenance facility. - Man.made lakes and lake-to-lake pipes and swales. An adult daycare program/area. JAN 2 8 G97 Thc Lely Palms of Naples project will not be subdivided. managed by a non-profit organization. SECTION ltl' The entire project, will be owned and PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIFrlON 3.1. PROPERTY OWNl~grq~p: 3.2, The subject property is currently or, reed by Lely Estates, Inc., 105 St. A~drews Boulevard, Naples, Florida 33942, ~nd is trader purcl~se conu'act agreement with Retirement Corporation of America, Inc. (agents for Naples Retirement, Inc.) LEGAL D~-~CRIPTION: Ali of that tract or parcel of land lying a~d being in Section 21, Tow~shlp 50 South. Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, a~d being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the west line of Section 21 and the Southerly right-of-way line of Rattlesnake Hammock Road (C-864). run South 890-27'-05" East along the said fight-of-way line for 2.00 feet; thence run South 89o-18-20" East along said fight-of-way line for 581.21 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. thence continue South 89o..18'-20' Fast along said right-of-way for 1012.46 fee~; thence South 18o-25'-12' Eas~ for 483.06 fee~; thence South 16o-13'-52" Wes~ for 890.35 feet; thence South 86o-58'~4' Wes~ for 327.18 fee~ ~o the Easterly boundary of the proposed Tanglewood Subdivision; Said point lying on a curve concave sou~westerly; ' thence following along the an: of said curve ia a nord:westerly direction, (said curve having a central angle of 15o-01'-24', a radius of 1290.00 feet, a chord of 337.28 feet, and a chord bearing of North I0o-32'-08" West) for 338.25 feet; thence South 71o-57'-I0" West for 150.00 feet to the No~erly right-of-way line of the proposed St.'Amlrews Boulevard, said point lying on a curve concave southwesterly; thence following along the arc of said curve in a Northwesterly direction, (said curve having a cenmal angle of 5o.00'-28", a radius of 1140.00 feet, a chord of 99.61 feet, and a chord bearing of North 200-33'-04' West), for 99.64 feet; thence North 66o-56'-42" East for 150.00 feet to the northeasterly right-of-way boundary of the proposed Tanglewood Subdivision, said point ly_~g o,, o ,',,we AO £N DA/~T. E~ \ ~ e~ C-~1~m~e.~d 4 NO. ~ ,JAN 2 8 lgg7 Pi. ~ concave Southwesterly; thence fotlow~g along the arc of said curve in a Northwesterly direction, (said curve having a central ~gle of 26o-19'.46", a radius of 1290.00 feet, a chord of 587.60 feet, a chord bearing of North 36o-IY-11" West), for 592.80 feet; thezace North 490-23'.04" West for 8.82 feet, to a point of curvature, said curve lying concave Southwesterly; th~ce along the arc of said curve Northwesterly, (said curve having a central angle of $o-I5'-16", a radius of 1790.00 feet, a chord of 164.10 feet, a chord bearing of North 52o-00'-42" West) for 164.16 feet; thence South 34o-43'-16" West for 150.0I feet to the Northeasterly right-of-way of St. A~ctrews Boulevard, said point lying on a curve concave Southwesterly, (said curve having a radius of 1640.00 feet, a central angle of 2o-47'-43", a chord of 80.00 feet, a chord bearing of North 55o-58'-40" West) for 80.01 feet; thence North 34o-43'-16" East for 254.43 feet; thence North 00o-:~2'.55' East for I94.21 feet to the Southerly right-of-way line of Rattlesmake Hammock Road, (C-$64), and the Point of Beginning. The above described tract is subject to all easements, rights-of-way, reservations, and restrictions of record, and entails 23.529 acres, more or less. AG£ND$ ITeM \ JAN 2 8 1997 S£CTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 4.1. Thc purpose of this Section is to set forth the re~tlations for development of the property identified on the M~t~r Development Plan. It ~ ~c intent of the project sponsor to develop a health care-integrated program for a residential retirement 4.2. The project plan including internal private street layout is illustrated in Exhibit A, Site Plan, WMP&B File No. RZ-61A, dated August 28, I996. The project shall consist of the following structures and facilities. 2-3 story residential apartment buildings, each contaiaing a maximum of 125 dwelling units (of which 50 dwelling units shall be used as assisted living units). 12 - One Story leisure living units (congregate assisdve care). 34-1 Story Multiplex Units with a maximum of 4 units per building. 1 - One Story licensed health center which will contain a maximum of 120 private or semi-private patient rooms, together with medical support and administrative facilities common to skilled nursing care. A Commons Area, containing a kitchen, dining, social recreational, Library, gift-beauty shop, administrative and utilitarian services and facilities. . A chapel. - Various outdoor recreational areas and facilities; - A golf cart/pedestriatVbike path. A car wash, laundry and maintenance facility. Manmade lakes and lake-to-lake pipes and swales. - An adult daycare program/area. AG E .N D,¥1T~M \ JAN 2 8 1997 4.3, '4.4. 4.5. 4.6. 4.7. Priucipal and ace. essory bttildings shall be developed general/), as indicated on the master plan. No principal bei/dings ahall be closer together than one-half the sum of their heights. No building shall be closer to a property boundary than 30 feet or one-half the building height, whichever is greater, except along the eastern property boundary adjacent to the 'PR" Cypress Preserve Trac~ in the Lely Resort PUD, which shall be twenty (20) feet. 3 stories above the base flood elevation for the apartments. 1 story above the base flood elevation for all other structures. 296 Maximum living dwelling units. 120 Maxh-num beds in the health center. 350 Square feet 330 covered and uncovered parking spaces shall be constructed. The Zoning Director may require that additional space shall be provided if a need for such additional spaces is demonstrated after the project is occupied. As permitted by the zoning ordinance in effect at time of application for building permit. Ail applicable Life Safety Codes will be complied with. For the purposes of Building Code Regulations, the health center portion of this PUD is hereby designated as a Fire District as described ha the Southern Standard Building Code as adopted by Collier County. SECTION V GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1, 5.2. The purpose of this Section is to set forth the standards for development of the project. Bo Co Go The PUD Master Development Plan, (Roger L. Schutle & Associates) RZ-65 is aa illustrative preliminary development plan. This plan is superceded by the Site Plan Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. File No. RZ-61A, dated August 28, 1996. The design criteria and layout illustrated on the Master Plan shall be. understood as flexible so that, the final design may satisfy the project and comply with ail applicable requirements. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities. Minor design changes shall be permitted subject to staff approval. Overall site design shall be harmonious in terms of landscaping, enclosure of structure, locations of all improved facilities, and location and treatment of buffer areas. To protect the integrity of the Planned Unit Development, the o~ly access road shall be the private road as shown on the Master Plan with an exception of a service entrance off of RaRlesnake Hammock Road. Areas illustrated as "lakes" shall be constructed lakes, or upon approval, ' parts thereof may be green areas in which as much natural foliage as practicable shall be preserved. Such areas, lakes and/or natural green areas, shall be of general area and configuration as shown on the Master Plan. (. 5.3. 5.5. Ail requirements for wa~ and wastewater supply shall comply with the Utility Manager Memo dated latmaty 5, 1982 which is made par~ of this document. Telephone, power and T.V. cable service shall be made available to all residential areas. All such utility lines shall be b~tall~ underground. SOLID WAST~ DIgPOgAT.: Such arrangements and agreements as necessary shall be made with aa approved solid waste disposal service to provide for solid waste collection service to all areas of the project. EXTERNAL TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS: A. The petitioner shall provide 17.5 feet of additional right-of-way along the north boundary of the property for future widening ofRatdesmke Haxnmock Road. Bo If this project is co~~ prior to connection of St. Andrews Boulevard to RattI~saake Hammock Road, the petitioner shall plot and construct that portion of St. Andrews Boulevard from his project entrance to Rattlensnake Hammock Road. ;" il~'ll! ii 1!;1fi l ,'D ,' ' I LIL~ PALMS IIETINIIMENT FACILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PETITION NO. PUD-9&-I4, ALAN D. REYNOLDS, AICP, OF WILSON, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC., AND GEORGE L. VARNADOE OF YOUNG, VANASSENDERP AND VARNADOE, P.A., REPRESENTING SUNCO BUILDING CORPORATION, REQUESTING A REZONE FROM "A" AND "A-ST" TO PUD TO BE KNOWN AS ISLAND WALK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A MAXIMUM OF 2,100 DWELLING UNITS AND A FIFTEEN (15) ACRE TOWN CENTER FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE EAST OF 1.75, IN SECTIONS 33 AND 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF ?05 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. (COMPANION TO DRI-96-1) OBJECTIVE: The objective of the petition is to have certain land as herein described rezoned from "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development. CONSIDERATIONS: The development will provide a maximum of 2,100 residential dwelling units, to include both single family and multi-family structures in a controlled access community. The focal point of ISLAND WALK is an internal, centrally looted, interrelated recreational, open space, and community service element, consisting ora large lake and green space network that links all residential neighborhoods via a pedestrian walkway system leading to a "Town Center". The Town Center will provide many retail, recreational, and community services and facilities that support the needs of ISLAND WALK residents and guests, including community meeting rooms, central postal facility, neighborhood retail goods and services including a restaurant, a recreation and aquatic center, and multi-purpose green space. By including a variety of services and facilities that meet the daily needs of residents within a short walking distance of their homes, many positive results occur, such as a reduction of demand for automobile trips within and beyond the community, and greater interaction and communication between residents. Inclusion of these land uses furthers the Collier County goals of encouraging mixed uses and reducing impacts associated with new development. The property lies within the Urban-Mixed Use Residential designated area on the Future Land Use Map to the FLUE to the GM~P. The density rating system applicable to land in this area authorizes a density of four (4) dwelling units per acre. This project requests a density of three (3) dwelling units per acre. Therefore the land use and density are consistent with the FLUE to the GMP. Developments of this magnitude also qualify for the PUD Neighborhood Commercial Sub-district. A fifteen (15) acre Town Center containing retail and service uses which by design will only serve project residents is proposed consistent with the provisions authorizln~; the Neighborhood Commercial syb- Relative to other applicable elements of the GMP the following consistency statements are made; i n I n - Recreation space for County wide application is covered through Recreation Impact fees which will be assessed each residential unit as it is developed. The Collier County Land Development Code requires sixty (60) percent of the gross acreage to be set aside as open space. The Master Plan advises that 276 acres is set aside as common ground. Nearly forty (40) percent of the land is in common space. Typically, development parcels will contribute more the remaining twenty (20) percent, therefore, staff feels confident that approval of' this project will be consistent with the Recreation and Open Space element to the GMP and the provision of'the LDC. ~ - By virtue of' the fact that public water supply and wastewater collection sysxem extending from the County's system will be developed throughout the project makes this project consistent with the water and sewer element of.the GMP. ~ - Specific requirements are included within the PLrD document to guarantee that goals, objectives, and policies of.the GMP will be achieved to the greatest extent possible. rv i ! - Given that the subject property has been actively farmed over its entirety, there are no applicable conservation issues, however, a small isolated wetland of 1.6 acres is being preserved. ffi ir I ti n 1 m n - Site generated trips exceed the Significance Test ($% of the Level of' Service "C" design capacity) within the project and within the projects radius of development influence (RDI). However, the site generated trips will not lower the level ofservlce below the adopted LOS "D" standard for any road segment within the project's RDI. Based on the above relationship and evaluation of' other applicable TCE policies it was concluded that this petition if approved will be consistent with policies 1.3, $. 1, $.2, 7.2 and 7.3 of the TCE. Staff' completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a favorable determination must be based. This evaluation is intended to provide an objective, comprehensive overview of. the impacts of. the proposed land use change, be they positive or negative, culminating in a staff recommendation based on that comprehensive overview. The listed criteria are specifically noted in Sections 2.7.2.5 and 2.7.3.2.5 of the Land Development Code thus requiring staff evaluation and comment, and form the basis for a recommendation of approval or denial by the Planning Commission once approved and/or otherwise modified to the Board of.County Commissioners. JAN ,~ 8 1997 Each of the potential impacts or considerations identified during the stafF review are listed under each of the criterion noted and are categorized as either pro or cons ot not applicable, whichever the case may be, in the opinion of staff. Staff review of each of the criterion is followed by a summary conclusion culminating in a determination of compliance, non-compliance, or compliance with mitigation. These evaluations are completed as separate documents and are attached to the staff'report. The Collier County Planning Commission heard this petition on December 19, 1996 and unanimously voted to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioner's. Three persons addressed the Commission expressing reservation. A copy of their written comments are included in this executive FISCAL IMPACT: This petition by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on the County. However, if this amendment achieves its objective, the land will be developed. The mere fact that new development has been approved will result in a future fiscal impact on County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help off-set the impact of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects in the Capital Improvement Element needed to maintain adopted levels of'service for public facilities. In the event that impact fee collections are inadequate to maintain adopted levels of'service, the County must provide supplemental funds from other revenue sources in order to build needed facilities. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Analysis of this petition as presented and as structured by its PUD regulatory document resulted in reaching a conclusion that its approval is consistent with the Collier County Cn'ow~h Management Plan. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance No. 90-24 at the earliest or next to occur of either final SDP approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: Staff's analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area of historical and archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment is required. 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve Petition PUD-96-14, as described by the Ordinance of'Adoption and Ey. Ju'bits thereto and made a part ofthis Executive Summary submission. · CHIEF PLANNER REVIEWED BY:  AICP --'--- ~.~.IRR~NT PLANNING MA~AG£R DONALD W. ARNOLD, AICP DATE T A, CAUTERO, AD'M~ISTRATOR DATE COMMUNITY DEV, AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS, Pud-96-14 EX SUlVIMARY/pd AGENDA ITEM\ JAN 2, 8 1997 Plo ~ I I I I AGENDA ITEM 7-F TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1996 PETITION NO: PUD-96-14, ISLANDWALK (COMPANION DRI-96-10 OWNER/AGENT: Agent: Mr. Alan D. Reynolds, AICP Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 Sunco Building Corporation 3600 Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Naples, Florida 34199 ..REQUESTED ACTION: This peri=ion seeks to have certain land as herein described rezoned from "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, comprised of the entire Section 33 and a small portion of Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East consisting of 705 acres which lies one mile east of 1-75 (See location map following page). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The development will provide a maximum of 2,100 residential dwelling units, to include both single family and multi-family structures in a controlled access community. The focal point of ISI2%ND W;kLK is an internal, centrally located, interrelated recreational, open space, and community service element, consisting of a large lake and green space, network that links all residential neighborhoods via a pedestrian walkway system leading to a "Town Center". The Town Center will provide many retail, recreational, and community services and facilities that support the needs of ISLAND W~K residents and guests, including community meeting room~~~ postal fazi!ity, neighborhood retail gooC.~-~~~e~clU~ AG£ND& ITEM- ~. JAN 2 8 1997 restaurant, a recreation and aquatic center, and multi-purpose green space. By including a variety of services and facilities that meet the daily needs of residents within a short walking distance of their homes, many positive results occur, such as a reduction of demand for automobile trips within and beyond the community, and greater interaction and communication between residents. Inclusion of these land uses furthers the Collier County goals of encouraging mixed uses and reducing impacts associated with new development. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Existing: Previous and existing land uses consist of active agricultural fields, farming facilities, farm workers village and a 1.6 acre isolated wetland. Active row crop farming occupies more than 673 acres (95%) of the project site. The isolated wetland system is located on the northeast portion of the subject property. This system is predominantly willow with most cypress occurring off-site. This system has been severely disturbed by past activities, such as farm ditching and berms, and exotic invasion. The property is zoned "A" Rural Agricultural. Surrounding: North - To the north the land is vacant and is zoned ~A" Rural Agricultural and PUD (Heritage Greens a residential/golf course planned community. East - The land is vacant and is zoned "A" Rural Agricultural. South - To the south the land is bounded by Vanderbilt Beach Road. The south side of Vanderbilt Beach Road is zoned "E" Estates and ~A" Rural Agricultural. There are no residences at this time with access to Vanderbilt Beach Road. The Estates lots are through lots fronting on both 7~ Avenue N.W. and Vanderbilt Beach Road. West - To the west lies properties within the "Estates" zoning district. Several parcels abutting the west limit of the subject property are developed~QJ~.~g~9_~: AGEND& IIEM \ 2 JAN 2 8 1997 P~..._~ GROWTH ~MENT PLAN CONSISTENCY.' The property lies within the Urban-Mixed Use. Residential designated area on the P~ture Land Use Map to the FLUE to the GMP. The density rating system applicable to land in this area authorizes a density of four (4) dwelling units per acre. This project requests a density of three (3) dwelling units per acre. Therefore the land use and density are consistent with the FLUE to the ~.P. Developments of this magnitude also qualify for the PUD Neighborhood Commercial Sub-district. A fifteen (15) acre Town Center containing retail and service uses which by design will only serve project residents is proposed consistent with the provisions authorizing the Neighborhood Commercial sub-district. Relative to other applicable elements of the GMP the following consis:ency statements are made; Recrea~icn and~ - Recreation space for County wide application is covered through Recreation Impact fees which will be assessed each residential unit as it is developed. Under the companfcn DRI Development Order no request was made to set aside a portion of the subject land for County wide recreation purposes. However, recreation space and services for use of residents of island walk will be available from the considerable co~on lands illustrated on the Master Plan (i.e. 103 acres). While no~ directly illustrated a similar development by this same developzent entity would indicate that recreation facilities will be available for project residents. The Collier County Land Development Code requires sixty (60) percen~ of the gross acreage to be set aside as open space. Open space includes water bodies and all pervious surface area, both that which is in common land, and that on each individual development parcel. The Master Plan advises that 276 acres is set aside as common ground. Nearly forty (40) percent of the land is in common space. Typically, development parcels will contribute more the remaining twenty (20) percent, therefore, staff feels confident that approval of this project will be consistent with the Recreation and Open Space element to the GMP and the provision of the LDC. Water and Sewer Element - By virtue of the fact that public water supply and wastewater collection system extending from the County's system will be developed throughout the project makes this prc~ect consistent with the water and sewer element of the GMP. Drainage Element - Specific requirements are included within the PUD docv-ent to guarantee that goals objectives and policies of the ~.? will be achieved to the greates! extent possible Conservation and Coastal Management Element - Given that the subject property has been actively farmed over its entirety, there are no applicable conservation issues, however, a small isolated wetland of 1.6 acres is being preserved. Other requirements for conservation contained in the LDC will be provided for as stipulations in the PUD to the extent necessary (i.e. preservation of natural vegetation). Traffic Circulation Element - The applicant's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and the Trip Generation Manual indicates that the site generated traffic for this project is approximately 9,340 ADT after trip adjustments. The project buildout is proposed to be in the year 2,002. Based on staff's analysis, the site generated trips exceed the Si~ntficance Test (5% of the Level of Service "C" design capacity} within the project and within the projects radius of development influence (RDI). However, the site generated trips will not lower the level of service below the adopted LOS ~D" standard for any road segment within the project's RDI. In addition, this petition is subject to the review and stipulations of the Regional Planning Council. The Traffic Circulation Element (TCE) lists Vanderbilt Beach Road as a 2 lane collector road. The current traffic count for this road west of CR-951 is 3,397 AADT which results in LOS "C". CR- 951 south of Vanderbilt Beach Road has a count of 8,338 and is operating at LOS "C". It should be noted that CR-951 from Immoka!ee Road to Golden Gate Boulevard is not scheduled to be improved to 4 lanes within the next five years. Other road improvements which will be required as development proceeds are listed in Table 21.A-3 in the ADA. In addition, a number of intersection improvements will be required by the time of buildout. Therefore, this project meets the County's concurrency requirement and is consistent with the standards referenced in Policy 1.3, 5.1, and 5.2 of the TCE. The layout of the conceptual PUD Master Plan from a planning standpoint suggests the following: The access point is only from Vanderbilt Beach Road. No roadway interconnection to the adjacent property is provided, however, provisions have been made to provide access to the future extension of Logan Boulevard. In view of the clear sight distance along this segment of Vanderbilt Beach Road, the proposed access should operate with an acceptable level of safety. In addition, the access point is subject to all required R.O.W. permits and the Collier County access Management Plan. The final access geometry and design of the traffic circulation system will be reviewed at the time of Site Development Plan (SDP) and/or Preliminary Subdivision Plat (PSP) review. Based on staff's review, the conceptual traffic circulation system is deemed consistent with Policy 7.2 and 7.3 of the TCE. The Traffic Accident report for 1995 shows the intersection of Vanderbi!t Beach Road and Logan Bouleva accident rate (under 10 per year). JAN 2, 8 1997 JAN 1 this petition if approved would be consistent with the Traffic Circulation Element of the GMP. HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: Staff's analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area of historical and archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment is required. Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code is during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity an historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Compliance Service Department contacted. EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: The subject petition has been reviewed by the appropriate staff responsih!e for oversight related to the above referenced areas of critical concern. This includes a review by tke Community Development Environmental and Engineering staff, and the Transportation Services Division. These reviews help shape the content cf the PUD Document and cause Development Corunitments to be formulated to achieve GMP and LDC requirements. Where the petitioner determined to challenge recommended revisions these are identified for final resolution by the Collier County Planning Commission, and County Board of Commissioners. No issues were raised by reviewing staff members that were not resolved or otherwise provided for in the PUD document. The EAB reviewed this petition relative to their jurisdictional concerns on December 3, 1996. Their recommendations are included in the PUD document. ANALYSIS: Appropriate evaluation of petitions for rezoning should establish a factual basis for supportive action by appointed and elected decision makers. The evaluation by professional staff should typically include an analysis of the petitioner's relationship to the community's futur6 land use plan, and whether or not a rezoning action would be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan in ail of its related elements. Other evaluation considerations should include an assessment of adequacy of transportation infrastructure, other infrastructure, and co--patibility with adjacent land uses, a consideration usually dealt with as a fact of analyzing the relationship of the, rezoning action to the long range P.~n~~ The most important facet of the rezoning action is that it constitutes a legislative statement that authorizes the use of land for a specific development strategy, provided the development of the land can go forward. It may or may not affect the timing of development because of subsequent permitting requirements. Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a favorable determination must be based. This evaluation is intended to provide an objective, comprehensive overview of the impacts of the proposed land use change, be they positive or negative, culminating in a staff recommendation based on that comprehensive overview. The listed criteria are specifically noted in Sections 2.7.2.5 and 2.7.3.2.5 of the Land Development Code thus requiring staff evaluation and comment, and form the basis for a recommendation of approval or denial by the Planning Commission once approved and/or otherwise modified to the Board of County Commissioners. Each of the potential impacts or considerations identified during the staff review are listed under each of the criterion noted and are categorized as either pro or cons or not applicable, whichever the case may be, in the opinion of staff. Staff review of each of the criterion is followed by a summary conclusion culminating in a determination of compliance, non-compliance, or compliance with mitigation. These evaluations are completed as separate documents and are attached to the staff report. Notwithstanding the above, staff in reviewing the determinants for adequate findings to support a rezoning action advise as follows: Relat~ Future and Existin_/ Land Uses: - A discussion of this relationship, ~ k~ ~pplies spe~-ca~i~ %0 Collier County's legal basis for land use planning, refers to the relationship of the proposed zoning action to the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Ail of the property is located within the Urban Residential area of the Future Land Use Map to the FLUE to the GMP. Given the availability of a potable water system and wastewater collection system and the urban influence impacting this area it is timely that this land now be.rezoned to an urban residential zoning classification. To the west of and south of the property the land is zoned ~'E" Estates. This land is part of the Golden Gate Estates Subdivision. The Vineyards development lies immediately southwest of the property. The Golden Gate Estates subdivision are exception to urban type residential development, even though in some areas certain parts of the Golden Gate Estates subdivision are completely surrounded with land earmarked for urban residential development based on the FLUE Map. This is the case for that portion of the Golden Gate Estates Subdivision that lies between the project and 1-75. affect the ability of adjacent lan~ JAN 8 1997 urban residential desi~llation. The residential development of the subject property should be deemed compatible because it is consistent with the FLUE, it is urban impacted and is capable of being served with the County's water and sewer system. Island Walk's design tends to isolate any potential housing from contiguous land by virtue of its ring road design and required perimeter landscape buffer. This enhances its compatibility with adjacent property insofar as there are differences in density. It should be appreciated that Heritage Greens lies north of this project and its density is comparable to what is proposed for Island Walk. The remaining Agricultural zoning along the north property line will likely be rezoned at some future date to a density equal to Island Walk and Heritage Greens, further justifying its compatibility assessment. Utility Infrastructure: - Both public sanitary sewers and municipal water supplies are available to the property and will be extended as a consequence of future platting to each lot or tract as they are platted. ~ll development must comply with surface water management requirements invoked at the time of subdividing as the case will be for development of this land. The water management system to serve the project will consist of an interconnected lake system. Runoff from the developed areas will be conveyed to the lakes by sheetflow, catch basins, and culvert systems. The lakes will then discharge through control structures into the Vanderbilt Beach right-of-way. This discharge will be conveyed to the west by the Vanderbilt Beach swale into the 1-75 canal and then south to the Golden Gate canal. Off-site flows from the north will be accommodated pursuant to the recommendations of the Harvey Basin Master Plan. This will be accomplished by passing runoff through or around the perimeter of the project or a combination thereof. Pursuant to the Island Walk PUD document, removal of fill and rock from Island Walk can be authorized up to a maximum of 500,000 cubic yards subject to the receipt of a commercial excavation permit. If .a commercial excavation permit is requested, the permit can be administratively approved by the Collier County Development Services Director or his designee. This project will further be permitted by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). CommuniTy Infrastructure and Services - Community Infrastructure and Services available are as follows: Fire - South side of Immokalee Road - 2.5 road miles, current condition, however potentially one mile following completion of the Logan Boulevard extension. fire stations o Ai~~~ al JAN 2 8 1997 Planned will also enhance emergency response times. Librar_~ - The nearest public library facility is located on Vanderbilt Beach Road near U.S. 41. County Parks - The Vineyards County Park is located within one mile of Island Walk. ~Facilities - Major concentrations of shopping facilities are located on Pine Ridge Road at the Vineyards, Pine Ridge/Airport Roads and Immokalee/Airport Roads. In the future major shopping facilities nearest the project will be at Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport Road. Island Walk is unique in the sense that it will include many convenience commercial type services that will reduce the need for residents to leave their homes to fulfill every consumer requirement. PUD Develc~-.nent Standards - Island Walk contains development standards for various housing development strategies that depend upon lo= s£ze and housing structure type. PUD's are generally given considerable latitude to establish standards that are different than conventional zoning districts. The assumption being tha~ as long as the standards apply uniformly throughout the PUD that persons investing in real estate know what to expect. The standards employed by this PUD are similar to the standards employed by many PUD's. This type of development has produced desirable end results and they remain attractive communities to this day. The maximum height of building is thirty-five (35) feet for single family, two family and townhouses, and fifty (50) feet for multiple family structures. The placement of various housing structure types will be no doubt guided in part by market conditions and the developers wish to achieve all of their development rights. Given the special development emphasis of the owner/entity, whereby they construct all of the housing units, there should be no concern relative to the potential to bring.about an inharmonious mixture of housing structure types. PUD Master Plan - It is important to recognize that provision is being made to reserve and dedicate sufficient land for the extension cf Logan Boulevard as required by the Traffic Ways Map which is part of the Traffic Element of the GMP. The Logan Boulevard extension will veer to the west at point north _ . a of Vanderbil~ Beach urlve so that it parallels the Section line which is ~ypically the alignment for major intracounty roads. Access to ~he planned Logan Boulevard ex - ' - 'sland Walk is proposed at the south and north e'~ds ~~~ ~ are secondary access points. The main access point is from Vanderbilt Beach Road. A collector ring road circumscribes the project exclusive of Logan Boulevard. No provision is made for interconnection with adjacent land. Given the size of the planned neighborhood and the immediate proximity of Logan Boulevard no interconnection should be necessary for adequate intracounty travel patterns. STAFF RECO~NDATION: That the Collier County Planning Commission recommend approval of Petition PUD-96-14 being a petition to rezone certain property to the Planned Unit Development district for a project titled island walk as described and regulated by the draft Ordinance of Adoption and Exhibits thereto (i.e. PUD document and Master Plan. PR PARED'B : ~ DATE REVIEWED BY: ROBERT ~ MULHE~, AICP ~N~D W. ARNOLD, A~CP PLAN~ING SERVICES~P~~ DI~CTOR ~INCENT A. ~UTERO, ~-~R CO~ITY DEV. ~D E~IRO~NT~ SVCS. DATE DATE DATE ~.. ~R CO~JNTY p~ISSION: PUD-96-1/ STAFF REPORT/md Petition ~kn~ber: PUD-96-14 Staff Report for December 19, 1996 CCPC meeting. NOTE: This Petition has. been advertised for the January 10, 1997 BCC meeting. .....<.~<.' AG£ND,) qr£.~, JAN 2 8 1997 FI2VDi2~GS FOR PUD PUD-96-14 Section 2.7.3.2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Planning Commission to make a finding as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the following criteria: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traf~c and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. .Pro: (i) Intensi~ng land development patterns produces economies of scale relative to public utilities, facilities and services, which are currently available in this area. (ii) The ement that location choice is enhanced for residential environments within the urban area reduces the push on urban sprawl. The subject property is served by a network of arterial roads, all of which are well within the urbanized area providing easy access to a host of community services and facilities. (iv) Comprehensive muhi-disciplined analysis supports the suitability of the land for the uses proposed. Con: As with ail actions that intensi~/urban development patterns there is some loss to travel time for users of the same arterial road system. Summary Findinz: Jurisdictional reviews by C~ounty staff support the manner and pattern of development proposed for the subject property. Development conditions contained in the PUD document give assurance that all infrastructure will be developed and be consistent with .County regulations. Any inadequacies which require supplementing the PUD document will be recommended to the Board of County Commissioners as conditions of approval by staff. Recommended mitigation measures will assure compliance with Level of Service relationships as prescribed by the Growth Management Plan. Adequac:,.- of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas aria i-aC~A~~ .,C ~:)1 "t'O b or maintained at public expense, wo./~) ~~ JAN 1 997 JAN 2 8 1997 Pe. __ ~ Evaluation not applicable. ~ Documents submitted with the applica6on provide evidence of' unified control. The PUD document makes appropriate provisions for continuing operation and maintenance of'common areas. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. Pro.__[ (ii The development strategy for the subject property is entirely consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of. the Growth Management Plan. Con'. (i) None. objectlv~ ~d policies otlhe ~o~h Managem~t Plan, A more ~alled description of this ~o~ty Is addressed in the StaffRepon. ~lo~g ~e l~d to be us~ for u~an residenfig pu~oses at the d~si~ propose. ~s ~fion h~ b~n r~ by the appropHate ~afffor ~mpli~ ~th the appli~[e tltmtn~ o~tbe ~o~h M~ag~t PI~, as not~ below: ~ - Consistency with FLUE requirements is tunher described as follows: ~ - Approv,,I would authorize twenty, one hundred (2100) dwmlllna unlt, who~e denalty would be 3,0 dwelllna units per acre, This is ~ontlecnt with the density rating system to the FLUE... ~I~- The. urban_relldentla] ~ubdl.~telet ellnw~ altFemttlaflfl,l, tlflJelqt~ t~am ,lift ,mm4,y muna mn areamoenna~ env]ronmem SUCh as recreat~ona~ accessory uses. r ffi ir ! i I n - Analysis of the subject petition concluded with a finding for consi~ency with the policies of the TCE. ·ecr 'n n I - Approximately 276 acres or 40% of the land area ,s to be developed as open space utilizing a syste ~es. ~ AGENDA I~E~/ t NO. 2 JAN £ 8 1997 997 This m'ea is exclusive of. the amount of' open space that remains as each development pazcel or tract or lot is developed. Said amount of'open space is equal to the open space requirement of. 60% for residential PUD's exclusive of. that open space related to actual residential development. Other a00licable element (s) - By virtue of. development commitments and master plan development strategy, stalTis of the opinion that the IslandWalk PUD is entirely consistent with provisions of'the Collier County GM~P. Staff' review indicates that this petition has been designed to account for the necessary relationships dictated by the GMP. Where appropriate, stipulations have been generated to ensure consistency with the GMP during the permitting process. Therefore, this petition has been deemed to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location o1' improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. .Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findlnt: The PUD Master Plan has been designed to optimize internal land use relationship through the use of. various forms of' open space sep~ation. External relationships are automatically regulated by the Land Development Code to assure hanno~ous relationships between projects. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. ~Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summar~ Findlnt: The amount ofopen space set aside by this project is greater then the provisions of the Land Development Code. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose o1' assuring the adequacy of available improvements ~'nd facilities, both public and private. .Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Finding: Timing or sequence of development in light of' concurrencT requirements is not a significant problem. See finding No. 1, also applicable for this finding. 3 JAN g 8 3997 AG£N~)A ~T~£1~ The ability of the subject property and or surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. ~Pro/Con; Evaluation not applicable. ~;ummar~ Finding: Ability, as applied in this context, implies supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal system, potable water supplies, characteristics of'the propcrty relative to hazards, and capacity of' roads, is supportive of conditions emanating fi.om urba~ development. T~s assessment is described at length in the staff report adopted by the CC'PC. Relative to this petition, development of' the subject property is timely, because supporting infrastructure is available. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application cf'such regulations. Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. _Summary Finding: This finding essentially requires an evnluation of the extent to which development standards proposed for tl~s PUD depart fi.om development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. The development standards in this PUD are similar to those standards used for panicular housing structures and associated area requirements. FINDINGS FOR PUD-96-14/pd AGENDA. ITEM ,JAN g 8 1997 REZONE FIND~GS PETITION PUD-96-14 Section 2.'/.2.5. of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the report and recommendations of'the Pl~ing Commission to the Bo~'d of County Commissioners shall show that the Planning Com~sslon has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the follo~,~ng, where applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and Future Land Use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summar',' FindinP. sl The proposed development is in compliance with the Future land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan for Collier Count' and all other elements. their objectives ~nd policies. Coml:~nJon PUD Finding evaJuation as well as the adopted CC'PC staff' report addresses this same ruxting. 2. The existing land use pattern; ~pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Existing: Previous and existing land uses consist of active agricultural fields, farming facilities, farm workers village and a 1.6 acre isolated wetland. Active row crop farming occupies more than 673 acres (95%) of the project site. The isolated wetland system is located on the northeast portion of the subject property. This system is predominantly willow with most cypress occurring off.- site. This system has been severely disturbed by past activities, such as farm ditching and berms, and exotic invasion. The property is zoned "A" Rural Agricultural. Surrounding: North- To the north the land is vacant and is zoned "A" Rural Agricultural and PUD ('Heritage Greens a residential/golf course planned community. JAN 2, 8 1997 / Fast - The land is vacant and is zoned "A' Rural Agricultural. South - To the south the land is bounded by Yanderbih Beach Road. The south side of. Vanderbilt Beach Road is zoned "E" Estates and '%" Rural Agricultural. - There are no residences at tl~s time with access to Vanderbilt Beach Road. The Estates lots are through lots fronting on both ?a Avenue N.W. and Vanderbilt Beach Road. West - To the west lies properties within the "Estates" zoning district. Several parcels abutting the west limit of' the subject property are developed with single family homes. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findings.._ The parcel is ora sufficient size that it will not result in an isolated distric~ urn'elated to adjacent and nearby districts because development of' the land simply implemems a part of' the GM]) FLUE Urban Designation, an action which is ?.xpec~ed given ~ timing is appropriate. Availability of. adequate infrastructure, nearby urban developmcm (i.e. The Vineyards) support the timing relationship and justify the conversioa process of'agricultural to urban residential zoning. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically d~wn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. .Pro/Corn Evaluation not applicable. ~ummarv Findings: The district boundaries are logically drawn. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage o£ the proposed amendment necessary. .Pro/Con:_ Evaluation not applicable. .Summary Findlni~s: The proposed zoning change is appropriate based on the existing conditiom of the property and because its relationship to the FLUE (Future Land Use Element of the GMS) is a positive one. 2 JAN 2 8 1997 _ e Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; pro: (i) The Countys land use policy as refleaed by the FLUE supports an action to allow urban residential development. (~0n: (i) Urban Mixed-Use development may not coincide with resldent's desire to maintain a natural atmosphere. ~;ummsr,,' Findings: The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood because the recommended development standards and other conditions for approval have been promulgated and designed to ensure the least amount of adverse impact on adjacent and nearby developments. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create t.~pes of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected ~jpes of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases ot' the development, or otherwise affect public safety. IF'to: Development of the subject property is consistent with provisions or' the Traffic Element of the GMP, therefore traffic intensity should not adversely affect the comf'ott and safety or'existing users on adjacent public roads. ('fl) Urban intensLflcation is cost effective. The goal of establishing a more traditional neighborhood with its own convenience services and recreational facilities should constitute a public benefit by discouraging external trips and therefore conserving highway capacity. (~on: 0) As urban intensification increases, there is some loss of corel'orr and east of travel to the motoring public. However, by law this degree ot'discomt'on is regulated by. concurrency requirements. Summary Findings; Evaluation of this project took into account the requirement for consis'ze~x:y with Policy 5.1 of the Traffic Element of the GMP and was found consistent, a statemeaz advising that this project when developed will not excessively increase traffic congestion Additionally certain traffic management system improvements are required as a conclkion of approval (i.e. mm lanes, traffic signals, dedications, etc.). analysis all projects are subject to the Concurren ,y ~,n%c, errtent system. [ AGENDb ITEM. ~ JAN 8 1997 3 In the final 1, Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; fro: O) Road improvements precipitated by tl~s development and water management improvements to accommodate site development are designed to accommodate the normal drainage requirement. . 0n: O) Urban intensification potentially can heighten the occasion for area-wide flooding under the more severe ~nfa]l event. ~;ummar~ Findin~sl Every project approved in Collier County involving the utiliza6on of land for some land use actMty is scrutinized and required to ~tigate all sub-surface drainage generated by deveTopmenta] actMties as a condition or approval. The water management system to serve the project will consist of an interconnected lake system. Runoff fi.om the developed areas will be conveyed to the lakes by sheetflow, catch basins, and culvert systems. T~e lakes will then discharge through control structures into the Vanderb~t Beach right-of.way. This discharge will be conveyed to the west by the Vanderb~t Beach swale into the 1-75 canal and then south to the Golden Gate canal The proposed discharge fi.om the site will be 38.6 cf.s at a rate 0£0.06 ct's/acre. Offsite flows fi.om the north will be accommodated pursuant to the recommendations of the ~ Basin Master Plan. This will be accomplished by passing runoff through or around the perimeter of' the project or a combination thereof'. The details of the best de.~gn are being developed at this time. Tl~s project was reviewed for dr~nage relatio~ and design and construction plans are required to meet County stancL~rds as a condi6on of approval. In the event area wide defidendes develop, wl~ch dc~c~enc~es would be further exacerbated by developing vacant land, the County is required to rea~ throu~ ks Concun-ency Management system. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; Pro/Con:_ Evaluation not applicable. .Summa~ FindlnRs: All' projects in Collier County are subject to the development standards that are unique to the zoning distr~ct in which it is located. These developmcnt standards and others apply generally and equally to all zoning distrkts (i.e. open space requiremenL corridor m~nagement provisions, etc.) were designed to ensure that penetragon and circulation of.a~r does not adversely affect adjacent areas. I0. 11. 12. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent are. a; Pro'. (i) Urban intensification typically ino'eases the value of adjacent or underutilized land. Development standards often do not reflect the quality of the project when it actually develops. More often than not developers have structured standards below the actual market response in order to be on the sate side. Con.' O) There is no way to guarantee that this project will be marketed in a manner comparable or complimentary to development in the nearby environs. ~Summarv~ This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results which may. be internal or external to the subject property that can affect property values. Property v~uation is s.fl'ected by a host of factors including zoning, however zoning by itself may or may not mq'ect values, since value determination by law is driven by market value. The mere fact that a property is given a new zoning designation may or may not affect vaJue. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; P~/Coa.- Evaluation not applicable. umm~~ The basic premise underlying ail of the development standards in the z. oni~ division of the Land Development Code is that their sound application when combined with the administrative site development plan approval process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in a deterrence to improvemem or development o£adjacent property. Whether the proposed change w~ constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare; Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findlng2~ The proposed development complies with the Oro~h management Pi;ut, a public policy statement supporting Zoning actions when they are consistent with raid Comprehensive PIan. In light of this fact the proposed change does not constitute a grant of'special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare rebdonship because actions consistent with lan~ in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial rcasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summar~ Findln~s; The subject property is zoned Rural Agriculture "A". To deny this petition would deprive the owner ofany reasonable use of'the property consistent with the G~,~. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the Cou n~-; ' Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findings: The proposed development complies with the Growth Management Pla~, a pokey statement which has evaluated the scale, density and intensity of land uses deemed to be acceptable for this site. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findings: This site is zoned "A" Rural Agriculture. W~ether or not there are o~er si~y zoned residential areas is irrelevant. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findings: Thc site will be altered to the ex'tent necessary to execute thc development strategy. 17. The impac! of'development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable. 6 dAN £ , Summar~ ]~ndin~s: St~ft'rev~ews for adequacy ofpubEc services and levels of set, ce determined that required in.rrastructure meets with GMP established rdationsh~ps. NOTE: GMP as used here~n means the Collier County Growth Management Plan. FLUE means the Furore Land Use Element ofthe GMP. I~.ZONE FINDINGS PUD-96-14/pd December 18, 1996 Collier County Planning Commission 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Dear Commission Members: As a property owner which directly adjoins the proposed Island Walk PUD, I have many concerns regarding the proposed project. In lieu of representing myself as an hysterical property owner, I have reached to individuals that are professionals in the field to assist me in presenting my concerns. Although John Bolt of Storm Water Management may disagree, you must first be brought up to date on easement improvements which are currently taking place on the 30 feet drainage easement which adjoins both my property and the proposed Island Walk property. As you will see with miscellaneous correspondence that has been attached, the County has represented this drainage improvement as "existing ditch maintenance." I met with Mr. Clayton Miller on site of this project this morning and we walked the entire project together. Neither myself nor Mr. Miller ever discovered any sign within the 9,000 feet project of an existing ditch measuring 2 feet in depth, with a 4 feet width and an eight feet height. It is apparent, and yet to be verified that Collier County represented the ditch which presently exists on the Harvey Brother Farm property. South Florida Water Management is reviewing the on going project for possible misrepresentation and/or exemption due to the size ofthe project. I have been assured that a written response will be forth coming from South Florida Water Management which will be available for the hearing before the Board Of C.ounty Commissioners. Had this been permitted with an Environmental Review, this report could have impact on the existing Site proposal. We do have, environmentaIly and habitat sensitive forested edge to the westerly boundary of the proposed Island Walk. approximately 6+ acres of Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Brothers Farm. In addition to this loss the removal o ' on the westerly boundary ofthe Farm will again rem As you will see by the correspondence that has been included ~om Klm Dryden of Florida Game and Fish as well as Mr. Gary Beardsley of Tropical Environmental Consultants, the Coufity through the drainage improvement efforts has destroyed s under the recommendation of both Florida Game and Fish and Gray Beardsley, that any remaining native vegetation on the existing dirt burro be preserved and that native Florida plants replace the Brazilian Pepper that is presently in existence. As you see by the enclosed Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Habitat Plan which has been f'malized by Pelican Strand, construction activity is prohibited within I00 feet of an active Big Cypress Fox Squirrel nest, and native vegetation is to be preserved. Given the existing Site Plan, a 20 feet buffer is proposed and then the 30 feet easement for the future Logan Boulevard. As is recommended in the report from Gary Beardley, a 100 feet buffer from Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Nests is again reiterated in the Construction Requirements within the Pelican Strand Management Plan. Kim Dryden has indicated in her correspondence that the 20 feet proposed Buffer has little to no value in the protection of habitat. Given the guidelines that are documented in Plans throughout 12 Developmenm within Collier County, the Site Plan needs to allow for a t least a 100 feet Buffer within the existing native vegetation and forested edge to assure the future protection of active nests against disturbance oftrafHc and development. In speaking with Dr. Stephen Humphries at the University in Gainesville and the Graduate Student that is presently documenting Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Habitat on the Hole In The Wall, Royal Poinciana and Wilderness Golf Courses, we may not be able to maintain the existing BCFS Colony within Units 96 and 97 because of the surrounding proposed developments. But to put it in their words, and in full agreement, it is dei'mitely worth a shot! In addition, the presence of Deer, Bobcat and Fox in our area raises another concern. The Site proposal has eliminated any future corridor for the movement of wildlife. This Site Plan, if accepted, will be close the corridor between Unit 96 and Unit 95 (which border the Vineyards to the East) which presently allows wildlife to cross Vanderbilt Beach extension and to continue moving within protective cover. In addition, with the recent loss of the forested buffer for the installation of the drainage ditch, with the proposed Logan Boulevard ex'tension, you have just placed a sense of condemnation on the property owners that adjoin the development. The setback requirements under the Estates.District is 10% ofthe lot width or 15 feet, whichever is less. Please be advised that in'some existing situations, you will be placing residential improvements within 65 feet of the proposed Logan Boulevard. Let it also be known that b)' the proposals within this PUD/DRI and the defining of this Easement of the proposed Logan Boulevard, you have now placed properly owners in the legal position of disclosure of this proposal on the future sale on their property. In speaking with Collier County Roads, the proposal to extend Logan Boulevard is not on the five year plan So therefore, I am disclosing an "unknown" for at/east five years. As a real estate sale professional in Florida, I have to assist in estimating of just how much value I a~ reaci'~lq~i} axtm ~, JAN 8 1997 proposed Site Plan. We are taking into consideration the recent easement improvements. the 20 feet buffer and the proposed Logan Boulevard extension or the legal need to disclose the same. Don Johnson has as~tred me that there is ~'tff/icient historical data to accomplish this task. I am also advising those neighbors whereby their improved structures will be within 65 feet of the proposed Logan to have the same Appraisal review completed. The Site Plan is impacting my values less than most as I chose to build my main residence to the West ofmy 4.67 acre Tract. My own appraisal will not be an accurate estimation in comparisons to others property owners. If Logan Boulevard is no longer being considered by the County, then an official letter from the Collier County Government needs to be isled to ALL road improvement is not going to happen to eliminate the legal need of disclosure. I have enclosed a letter from Attorney John White which addresses the issue ofdisclosure based upon the present Site Plan. In addition, a copy of the PUD/DRI Maps which indicate future Logan Boulevard through to the County Line have been forwarded to the Homeowner Associafion.n of Long north/south corridor, I think their input at the Count}, Commission Meeting for approva] of this development is also warranted. The last issue that I would like to bring to you attention is road impact. It is proposing that a traffic light is to be installed at the south entrance to Oakes Boulevard offof Vanderbilt Beach Extension. The present speed limit on Oakes Boulevard, a corridor which runs north and south in a residential neighborhood, is at present 45 MPH. This is the same speed limit that is on Immokalee Road! If you are considering this travel speed in any traffic assessment, you need to be informed that it is the intention of the Homeowners within Units 96 and 97 to petition the County to reduce this speed limit to a minimum of 30 MPH. Orange Blossom which connects Airport Pulling to Goodlette- Frank Road is no different than Oakes Boulevard. The speed limit on that artery is 30MPH. 5630 16~' Avenue, NW Naples, Florida 34119 (941) 591-2922 JAN 8 1997 COLLtR COUNTY ~UBLIC WORKS DI~,qSION May 8, 1996 Dear Collier COunty Property Owner: 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FL 33962 (941) 732.2575 FAX (941) 732.2526 A CEAT~FI -F.D BLUE C1 lip On behalf of the Collier County Stormwater Management Department, please be advised that drainage improvements are scheduled in your area. All construction will take place within the Collier County 30 feet drainage easement along the east edge of Golden Gate Estates Units 96 and 97. The improvements will include clearing the easement and constructing a shallow conveyance ditch to the south connecting to the Vanderbilt Beach Road canal. This project is being undertaken as a result of the flooding your area experience in past years, especially during 1995. By providing a positive outfall route for excess runoff, · this project should improve the area's, drainage capabilities although it is not a sure-fix. ~ Thank you in advance for your patience as we undertake these improvements. If you have any tfuestions please feel free to call this office at (941) 732-2501 or the Engineering Consultant, Richard McCormick, P.E., of Wilkison & Associates, Inc., at (941)643-2404. Very truly yours, John H. Boldt, P.E.,P.L.S. Stormwater Management Director JHB/mts cc: Thomas E. Conrecode, P.E., Publio Works Administrator George F. Archibald, P.E., Transportation Department Director Richard McCormick, P.E., Wilkison & Associates, Inc. Doc: 10107 JAN 8 1997 CON 24.06 :,ECEIYED r"'3JECT REVIEW SER¥lC MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Margaret Bishop, Supervh~i Professional. Fort Myers Service Center, Field Engineering Division, Reguhdoa Department ,,~lerry Kurtz, Area Engineer, Collier County, Field Eng/neer/ng Division, Regulado, Depmment DATE: Janu~y 8, 1996 SUBJECT: Ex/sting Ditch Maintenance Bast of Oa~ Boulevard Coil/er County S~cdor, s 29 & 32/'TownsMp 48/Range 26 ; Collier Coun,D' Staff reques:ed our ~d~tance in evaluat/on oE a proposed ex/sthag ditch clea=/n~ acdv/:y. The ditch is loc~ted appro~m~tely one (1) tm'le east of Boulevard al~ng the e~st boundary of ~ect/ons 29 and 32. The' le~ltxh is app. rox/m_ate!y t~o (:2) m/les. The site was inspected on October 12. 199-~. The ditch is approx/mately two (:l) to three (3) feet deep w/th a four (4) foot bottom width and an eight (8) foot top width. Vegetation/:row~h in the dltch is significant, condsting rn~l~ly of B~n'!ian Pepper. Th/s proposed clkch mz/menance will help relieve some street and yard flooding east of Oaks Boulevard. The ditch is located taa ¢,unty drahage easement. By copy of this memo to Coll/er Coun~ Compl/anc¢ Services. I/eld Engineering acknowledges upcom/ng ditch cleaning. , OK Attached: SFWMD Ditch Clennlng and Ma/menance Suggest/om Clyde Fu§ate, Collier2-Coun~ -C. ompl/ance.Serv/ces Start Chryanowskl, Coil/er County Pla~ Rev/ew F.E. File, Naples JAN 2 8 1997 chat routine ditch eXe~ acc~y~C~at, ~efs Tt~ carefully portend, ~d the Florida ~caca Xn cues v~era Cbt clsanAuZ or Raincemance of nnperm~ttad ditches or mealee b ~a~airad, the the act~ ~le~iRg/u~te~uca aa:ivi~y. .~so, prior to ~tht~=g such Contact, it uo~ly seres ~,~OUt's best A~terests i~ you have fva~abXe h dAt~ to be ~md. ~ n n the mint n~ for ~m~ these ~m.) it. Either a vewba~ ac~ledle~ut of the -pc~nS alou~l ~1~ ~ live~ o~ ~u~cher ~omcio= ~uld be requested, L? =,cessa~, co clari~y the ~ull .c~, o~ th, proposed The folloving guidelin!s should ~lvays be folloved regarding all cliaming/taintena~ce operaclous: 1. Kt~ntaxt~ae/c~czvation must be ~u~ted to the r~mova~ of ~tSttar~ou p~C rooC zone. Ditch cleAui~ spoils or debris m~c be disposed of ~u each · water in the area. PLQBLIC WOEK$ DIVI!I~4 Fax:g417:J.z2526 Dec 15 '96 8:5! P. 0'5/05 PAGE 2 ~chln ~Iovable bounds or rtlk b$~ c/Cad by the D~m~. , . Section. Zf cica~ for a '$urfa-e' ..... - ---. ..... ~cC I ~nforc~.nc -ar-- - . . b wa~er ~g~n~ ViOAa~iOU, ~he respo~ible p cy uy ~e rtq~rec ~o pay an applicable cLv~ pe~, ~es~igacive cosc~ ~/or lcCo~eya ~ees. required or ncc. T? . ...... , .... F ~lC~cc e~cI era a~ vi ~1 do eve~ch~= ...... --- _~7cb~ff pleat contact us ~trsc -/ · p~aW~aAe CO ~XC~y r~l~ your mplc~f/c b~ D~ocr~cc X~.. ~d ie~lac~on,, ~ ~ pa~ t~c b Pe~mw~ble you need Co kno~ more, have an~ questions, or ~f you wish ~ch us, please contact any of the District s fLeld Engineer/ag ~ta %nginetrs or FieLd Represeucaclves ret where Cbt proposed work is in- ts -~ ..... ~ .... ~f~r the %eograph~c areq AGEND~I~U ~ ~ I · ~ V~LKI$ON & P. 2 D~e: D~ccmber 3, 1996 Ozkes DrlLuxge Ditch · Project Summary and Backrround your requcsL a projea ftunmar~ for ~ ~ove referenced project is provided. The Oakes ~c ditch preJecx h~cludes the conm~'tfon ofa ~,250 fl, km~ swde to collect ~,,,~ff from duc eastern area of Oolden O~e Bsu~es Umks 1~o. 96 and 97, m~d to convey fbi, ~oft'to th~ Vaadcrb~ Be~ch Road csml. It is om' umie~_~,~[-g that tt~ area has a~on~ loth - 2~h Avenues h~ · dr~eway culve~ w'J~ch ~J ~1o1~ to the e~. ]~ccau~ CoD/er ¢oun~ h~ ~ n~b~a the dhch h ~ ~0 foo~ ~c ~ ~c ~ff ~w~menm. h Feb~ 1~6, W~ ~ ~~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~e do~ ~ ~ to~~ ~ ~n ~~ ~& ~ ~y ~ T~ Co~ier County Stomwater Manag~ DcpartmenI reznain~l proaa~ ~n efforts to keep the cornmunky informed of the proposed h~:~ro~ts. W3c~. assisted Colder County wi:h the notification to adjacent property owners regarding the project scope and schedule (letter altached). W&A mc~iv~ two telephone calls h support of the project and none in opposition. In addition, two landowners were ~owed time to receive tlzir necessary right-of-way permit, So thc County could ks:lud¢ the culvert com-tmctbn ~ thc Oak, ch-~i,~ge dr:ch project. 3506 EXCHANGE AV~., NAPLES, FL 34104 941-64 DAVID S WIL~$ON, ~E. JAMF~ N. ~gl. lO: Dece:~bet 3, I996 ]Vt. Mc.NT~I1 ?~e :2 oi':2 ~ clei~:h or'the :proposed s~vale ~ ~ fi'om ~o to two ~ 22n~ Av~ ~ to V~ B~ ~' A ~vel~y ~ ~ ~a~ for ~o~ ~e ~~ ~ ~ work ~ to ~ ~ ~c ~ ~t ~ e~~ ~ ~ ~ not ~ To ~ · e d~i~ p~ ~ ~r ~ ~n of ~t f~ g ~ ~ch o~- ~ ~o~ JAN 2 8 1997 dA, 99 t2/e~/l~$6 e~:3.5 lCJ43.26:3007? TRi~ICAL ENVZR C PAGE: 0.1, Gary and Cathy Graves 5630 16th Avenue NW Naples, Florida 34119 TROPICAL ENVIRON~tENTAL CONSLTLTANTS 2396 13th Street, North Phone 6,. Fax (813) 263-00?? December 5, 1996 RE: Preliminary Analysis/Evaluation of habitat alterations, those now occurring (the drainage easement) and those proposed (ag lands adjacent to the east, 'DeVosta" proposal) relative to wildlife usage. Dear Cathy and Gary, Per our discussions on the phone, our on site meeting with you November 26, 1996 and my review of relevant Tropical Environmental Consultants office file documents please find my environmental evaluation. I will first address the 30 foot wide drainage easement (Right-of-way) recently cleared along your eastern property boundary. My review of the 1990 Collier County Soil Survey Indicates that hydric soils are present within a majority of the entire length of the drainage R. O. W. for at least two miles. As we discussed in the field thls condition In and of itself does not mean that regulatory agencies would assert wetland jurisdiction. Two other characteristics must also occur, i. e., wetland vegetation and sufficient hydroperiod before the three tests are met. ! would, however, recommend you inquire at the county if a wetland determination was undertaken and what the agency (South Florida Water Management District-SFWMD and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-USACOE) determined. What is evident to me was the lack of ,n~tal, page llof 5 -- j~ 1997--... 12106/1.~:-~ 00:15 1.~.;1~,~38077 TROPI:CAL ~,IVI:R C Pt.~G;' 02 ( TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL · CONSULTANTS 2~6 l.~th Street, North  ~one & Fax (513) 26J~77 containment fence, along the western edge of ~e R. O. W. This ~ required by the county itself for two reasons: 1) to prevent soil/silt/fines ~om entering wetlands and open water such as ~nals, 2) to cloady delineate the limits of clearin~ and thus protect native vegetation outside of the county drainage easement ~om ~mage installation of this de~ce Is a start<etd proceedure and considered a Be~ Management Pm~lce (BMP's) for land alterations dudng construction. Surpd~d the county does not follow its own requirements. Your observations that the Big Cypress Fox squirrel commonly forages and dwells in your yard and general vlcinity was verified as we saw several behind your residence and up on the roof. Obviously necessary life history requlrements of this species are being provided in Unit 97 and most shuridly along the entire ag land forested edge. A detailed survey must be conducted to evaluate where denlng/nestlng sites exist as the Florida Game and Fish Commission legally can only protect the nest sites. This is required before land alterations can begin. Of special concern to me was did the county conduct such a survey before the clearing of the R. O. W. was begun? The stand of melaleuca trees present behind your office and residence would be prime habitat for squirrel nests. The Big Cypress Fox squirrel seems to prefer constructing nests within the dense canopy of melaleuca found within altered wetlands. Destruction of these without proper review and permitting by the FL. G. & F C would be a clear violation of Florida law. A portion of the cypress, melaleuca and slash pine stand clearly was present within the R. O. W. along your property. ! would recommend that you confer with county staff to determine if this survey was conducted and what were the findings. page 2 o AG£ND& II:EM ,JAN £ 8 1997 AGENDA ITEM,. . TROPICAL ENVIRONM~-NTAL CONSULTANTS 2396 13~h Street, No~h N.?Irs, Flortcla 33940 Phone & Fax (813) 26.t.¢077 Edges between differing landscape vegetational feature (ecotones) are very rich and diverse when considering the variety and numbers of plant and animal species. This biodiverslty is possible because the habitat provides essential needs of a variety of species such as the Big Cypress Fox squirrel and the Bob cat. Note, scat was noted within the cleared R. O. W. This edge, along the Estates lots from Vanderbilt Road to Immockalee, also provides a forested corridor which facilitates movement of wildlife over larger distances. Some comments relative to the proposed land alterations wtthin the ag fields adjacent and to the east of you. My first concern, now that the 30' drainage R. O. W. has been cleared, is the potential loss of additional forested edge which presently exists on or along the ag perimeter spoil berm. Prior to the clearing of the R. O. W. the edge of the farm fields, Just at the perimeter spoil mound, functioned as the ecotonal edge community. If the ag property also has a 30' drainage easement, one contiguous with your 30' easement, then it too might be cleared. The entire berm and associated ag ditch would be eliminated and in it place would be a 60' drainage easement, completely devoid of mature native trees. This would further degrade the functional aspects of the occupied range-of the bob cat and the El. C. fox squirrel as well as other wildlife. One requirement of larger developments, such as the one being proposed by Mr. DeVosta, is that a perimeter berm be installed to insure storm water runoff is held within the development. This new berm would be constructed interior to the 60' drainage R. O. W. further eliminating forested corridors for wildlife movement. page 3 of AGENDA LTEM \ s JAN ~ 8 1997 TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL · CONSULTANTS 2.~96 13th Str~t Phone & F=x (813) 2634077 County planning staff, as recently as two weeks ago, expressed concern by the new type of development being designed which offer little native vegetated buffers but instead consist of a repeating finger lake and fill complex, one which ~double loads" housing along access roads. Environmentally, functionally, these designs preserve little to no forested areas especially if slated for already cleared active ag areas such as that to the east of you. As you know the county Land Development code Regulations require preservation of a percentage of native habitat when present. Development in previous active ag areas do not have to preserve native habitat if none existed. The Collier staff professional planners believe that these types of development desfgns could be more environmentally and esthettcaIiy pleasing, if required to recreate masses of native vegetation, such as adequate and functional perimeter buffers. I concur with :hat evaluation. Specific efforts are being proposed through the 'South Florida Water Management District's Envfronmental Advisory Committee to request tht the District evaluate the effectiveness of buffer requirements on water quality and wildlife values. The scientific literature clearly suggests that buffers of 100+ I~eet are necessar~ to preserve wildlife values and maintian biodiversity. No one in the field of ecology/wildlife management would disagree that the fragmentation of the landscape by agricultural practices and urban development is a threat to 'wildlife and biodiversity. They also agree that there are designs which if incorporated into both land uses would enhance the value to wildlife, especially if the more Intense landscape altering land use is adjacent to larger Intact habitat systems, L e., rural estates type mosaic where the majority of the naUve vegetation is retained. page 4 ol JAN 2 8 1997 ~' TROPICAL ~qVIRONMENTAL ~ J~L [J CONSULTAI~T..TS Ph~e ~ F,~ (813) 263-~7 There ~re Best M~n~gement Pr~ices (BMP's) which, il ~pp~ed to ~e DeVost~ ~nd ~rleton Lakes style design ~t, would enhance, ~ugment, ~lre~dy existing h~blt~t ~ncflons provided ~long ~he estates unlts-~g fields inte~ce. ~e cre~tlon al ~ forested buffer ~long the edges, e~ecimlty ~en ~ more Intense l~nd ~e is ~oposed on one side, e. g., ~e ~rm fields multJf~mJly units ~dj~cent to the single ~mJly estates zoning, would ~ssJst both developments to bddge the ~mns~tJon between them ~s well as provide corridor edge h~blt~t for wildlife. in conclusion your statement that the creation of finger lakes would involve blasting to fracture the subsurface rock and facilitate the excavation process has the potential to alter ground water hydrology and recharge characteristics, especlalJy in adjacent wetlands due to the potential of Karst conditions in southwest Florida. Fractures could alter near surface marl/clay layers allowing summer rains to more quickly penetrate downward reducing the hydropertod of affected wetlands. This and formation of sink holes were a serious problem when the Lee County Regional (now International) airport was constructed. My report Is general in coverage, however additional field Investigation and review of county records and permit applications would alJow a more accurate evaluation of environmental issues raised. Thank you for allowing Tropical Environmental Consultants to assist your Information gathering process. If we can assist your effort further please give a call. Gary Lee 8eardsley - ~[ Biologist/Consultant copy: Commission Tim Constantine Collier County E A B Klm Dryden-F G & F Commission South Florida Water Management District-Fort The Conservancy of SW Florida Myers AG£ND~ 17~ ~, JAN 2 8 1997 FLORIDA GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION --~.=:-" IL'~IE K..MO~U~J$ QUL~'TON L. N£DGE~-~'H. DDS MRS. GILBERT 4: H~'.~PHR.EY THOMAS B. I~IBLER JOE BRL.'~'ER S &'",.sot~ .Mi&~ ~Gccos,.I,~ Lakeland Desert ALLAN L. EGBERT. Ph.D.. V~CTOR J. H~LLER. Ms. Cathy Graves 5630 16th Avenue, Naples, FL 34119 Office of Environnental Sez~lces 29200 Tuckers Grade l~nta Garda, FL 33955 December 11, 1996 Big C~press Fox Squirrel Habitat, Oakes Boulevard Area, Island Walk DR! Dear Ms. Graves: This is in response to your letter dated November 26 regarding potential impacts to the Big Cypress fox squirrel, a state-threatened species, and other non-listed wildlife, as a result of the development of the referenced Island Walk Development of Regional Iupact.(DRI). Your letter indicates Chat Collier County also cleared a drainage easement adjacent to your property, possibly in conjunction with the proposed development. You requested information as to whether the Game and Fresh Water Fish Comsission (CFC) vas contacted with regard to the clearing on the drainage easement, which apparently vas vegetated with pine, Melaleuca, and brazilian pepper. You also asked for information on habitat management practices for fox squirrels. ! can confirm that the area in which you live does have · significant fox squirrel population. Fox squirrels in Collier County are dependent on slash pine, bald cypress, cabbage paIm for forage and nestin& (sometimes in bromeliads on the trees). However, Big Cypress fox squirrels in Southwest Florida do use exotic vegetation, particularly Melaleuca, for nesting. This is not to condone the preservation of Melaleuca, which has very detrimental impacts on fox squirrel habitat as a whole, but is a statement of fact. We regularly coordinate with cpnsultants, developers, and Collier County staff to assure that forested areas; including Melaleuca-invaded habitats, are checked for the presence of active nests prior to clearing activities. In this case, we were not contacted regarding the easement habitat clearing. As discussed with you, we did not review the referenced DRI because of our workload and the fact that the site vas primarily a cleared farm field. There is, of course, a big difference in wildlife use between even an active farm field and a development site. I concur with you Chat the development of the site has potential to impact fox squirrel populations and that better planning of the site could benefit fox squirr,~ls and other wild,ire in your subdivision. I have the following recommendal JAN 2 8 1997 .FISI~I .~, ~/~'ILDLI 1943 - 1993 50 YEARS AS STEV,~RD OF FLORIDA', Es'. Cathy Craves December 11, 1996 Page 2 fox squirrels and development sites in Southwest Florida: 1) Fox squirrels (bobcats, foxes, etc) are particularly vulnerable to roadklll as they spend much of ~heir tine on ~ha ground (very different from gray squirrels). I have retrieved fox squirrel roadkllls from all over western Collier Cotm~y. The proposed DRI plan you provided shove Logan Boulevard extension as being constructed adjacent to your proper~y. Hoving the roadway further to the east, away from ~he forested Estates0 would reduce ~he potential for roadklll. Fox squirrels viii cross large open areas in search of food resources and have large hone ranges, so toying ~he road will not totally eliminate roadkill, especially since ~his road nay become a north/south corridor into Lee Coufl~ (we have recommended ~he Logan Boulevard alignnent over the S.R. 951 aligrunent because of impacts to regional wildlife resources). ..* 2) Any existingnative fox squirrel habitat (forest), particularly sl&sh pine, cypress, and cabbage palm, should be preserved. Although we recommend the removal of exotics such as Helaleuca, no removal should occur before trees ere checked (by a qualified biologist) for active fox squirrel nests. On most development sites, we recommend re-planting areas where exotics have been removed with native trees. 3) A habitat buffer to intensive development, along vl~h any reduction in residential density chat would allow more habitat preservation/restoration, is beneficial to wildlife, including fox squirrels. Hlxed-use development causes the disturbances to native wildlife, including problems associated with pets (predation, disturbance), light and noise (deters some habitat use by some species), nuisance animal complaints (animals such as bobcats or bats killed or removed because of real or perceived ~hreat), roadkill ('slow' speed~ rarely eliminate the problem), herbicide/pesticide (including sosquito spraying) application (kills non-target species), and proliferation of 'common species" such as raccoons, pigeons, mockingbirds, and arnadillos, that compete with other more habitat sensitive wildlife species. The proliferation of common or nuisance animals on development sites can affect ~he quallL~ of adjacent wildlife communities, including some of the bird species you mentioned in your letter. The buffer should be as big as possible (usually economics are the determining factor). The proposed 20-fl buffer you mentioned has very little value. Please call me at (9~1) 575-5765 if you have any questions. ~/~d KNV 1-11-2 cc: Collier Co. Development Services Sincerely, Kinberly A. Dryden Biological Scientist IV JAN g 8 1997 BIG CYPRESS FOX SQUIRREL HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN PELICAN STRAND Prepared For Pelican Strand, Ltd. 10100 Valewood Drive Naples, FL 33999 Prepared l~y Boylan ~ Environm: i& Consultants, ac. ieetland & ~Idlife Surve~nmentaI Permtmn$. Impact ~Je. tlrnent~ 102.ti Metro Pa~wav Suite 20:~. Fort Myers. Florida. Phon~: ¢gaD 418-0671 Fax: ~gal} ~18-067:~ November 4, 1996 AGENDA.~ FI. Approximately 12.96 acres of pine flatwoods will be created adjacent to the golf course in the northern area of the site. The approximate locations of these areas are shown in the aRached preservation plan. Once construction is completed these areas will be re vegetated with species native to pine fiarwoods. The tree density will be based on 25 foot centers and the shrub plantings based on 20 foot centers. The plantings will be clustered to mimic natural communities. The following is a list of potential species to be planted: Trees Pinus elliottii Quercus virginiana Sabal palmetto Strangler Fig Persea spp. Mid story Ilex cassine lle~c gtabra Myrica cerifera Serenoa repens Befaria racemosa Lyonia ferruginea The specific species planted will depend on the site conditions when the construction is completed and the market availability of the various plant material. No exotic palms or trees will be substituted for native plants. The majority of the tree plantings, approximately 80 percent will consist of slash pine. Construct/on Details Immediately prior to initiation of construction on any phase of development, the areas will be checked for the presence of Big Cypress Fox Squirrel nests. If active nests are found, buffers will be maintained around the nest trees until the nests are deemed inactive. The buffers are anticipated to be around 100 feet in width. Any deviations from this dimension will be presented to the FGFWFC for review and approval, prior to implementation. Before implementation of the restoration work, the limits of any native vegetation, especially mature slash pine, will be marked in the field and the areas barricaded to maintain this vegetation intact Most of the Big Cypress Fox Squirrel habitat will be placed under a Conservation Easement to Collier County or the SFWMD. A copy of this plan will be an attachment to the easement. The exceptions to this are the areas immediately adjacent to the golf course areas. These areas will be within designated common area and signage will be posted alerting pedestrians of the preservation status of these areas. Ail Big Cypress Fox Squirrel habitat will be subject to a long term maintenance program. 7 JAN 8 199Z Existing Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Nest Adjoining Drainage Easement Improvements. Ho. ~ JAN 'Big Cypress Fox Squirrels That Currently Exist On My Adjoining Property. N g 8 1¢97 BRIM~EK~Hp FLORID~ TEL:941-565-2705. Dec 17 96 I0:27 No.O01P.01 17 December 1996 Collier County Government 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples 1ri, 34104 Attention: County Current Planning Section Mr Ronald Nino Re: Island Walk PUD-96-J4 & D1~.96-1 Dear Mr Nlno: I am quite concerned about the extension of Logan Boulevard which is being proposed in connection with the above meca. subdivision. Is it intended that the streets of Units 96 and 97 which run east of Oakes Boulevard will now connect to this proposed extension of Logan Boulevard? Without getting in~o the discussion of'the need for yet another meca-subdivision tn Col!ier County, I[ nm quite sure there are very few residents of Umts 96 and 97 who would like to see their streets become through streets. If the developer would like to extend Logan Boulevards why cnn he not include the 20 foot landscape buffer the entire length of the proposed extension? I hope you will consider this when you make your dec~sion regarding this project. mekamp 5891 14th Avenue NM/ Haples FL 34119-1249 JAN 2 8 1997 ,,,. · ' · Petition Number Da e APPLICAT/ON FOR PUBLIC I-IEAPJNI~ ~,~' .~.,'.~" e. COMMUNITY DEV£LO?M mT DIVISION Name ofApplicant(s): _ Suneo Building Co _rpora60n Applicant's Mailing Address: City: . Naples Applicant's Telephone Number: 3600 Vanderbilt Beach Road Ex-tension State: FL Zip: 33999 (941 } 594-7400 Is the Applicant the owner of the ~bjeel property? . YES __,X_._NO a) If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name beneficiaries below. b) If applicant is a corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major s~ockholders below. c) If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate name principals below. d) e) If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other o~ers, if any. If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. x 0 If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address below. Please refer to Joint Consent and Appoinhsient of Agents. Attachment 4-1 in ADA (Ifspace is inadequate, attach on .separate page.) Name ofAgent: _ Alan D. Reynolds. AICp Firm: Wilson. Miller. Barton. and Peek. Inc. Agent's Mailing Address: City: Naples State: FL Agent's Telephone Number: ~ 04/)9.'96- W-O~?20101 ,MCP I-O?~2~-OI.PPUD Zi 2. Name of Agent: George L. VarnadQ~ Young. van Assendetp and Varnadoe. P.A, Agent's Mailing Address: 801 Laurel Oak Drive. Suite 300 City: _Naples Agent's Telephone Number: State: . FL Zip: 33969 941-597-2g14 DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THE APPLICATION (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page. If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal description for property involved in each district. If property is odd-shaped, submit copies of survey (1" to 400' scale). THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPLYING THE CORRECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION. IF QUESTIONS ARISE CONCERNING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AN ENG~ER'S CERTIFICATION SHALL BE REQUIRED. SECTION: 33 TOWNSHIP: . 4g South RANGE: Detailed legal description is contained in the PUD document. Section 1,2 26 East Size of Proper~': 6600 fi. x Address or location of subject property: one mile east ofi-75 5345 fl. Acres: _ 7054- North side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. approximately Existing Land Elevation: _ 12 feet-NGVD ao Date subject property acquired da)' of ,19. Term of Lease: , yrs./mos. County Flood Criteria Elevation: or leased ; If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date ofoption: Please refer to Attachment 4-I in Application for Development Approval, and date option terminates: Does property ov,~er own contiguous property to the subject property? If description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separa No. 04'19.96. W-07720101 MCP I .O't72-07.0! .PPUD 2 10. This application is intended to cover:. (Check which type ofpetition you are requesting): -X_ A. Rezoning: Present Zoning: _ A and A-ST _ Requested Zoning: for:~ ~ -__ B. Conditional Use: ~£:- Zon/ng for: Reason why appIicat/on should be approved. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.): I1. 12. 13. Is proposed use prohibited by deed restrictions? _ If yes, provide cop>, of the deed restrictions. Is this request a result ora violation?...__.__i~ If so, to whom was the notice served? __NO Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year?_.____]~ Ifso, in whose name7 14. Are there existing structures on the property? ~ TYPE: CBS _ _, FRAME -- ~ MOBILE HOME ~ OTHER The site accommodates 13 mobile homes, which provide housing for employees of the agricultural operation currently occurring on site. These mobile homes will be removed as development commences on the project. 0~'lg.'~e. 9,'"07720101 MCP I-~?72-07.0! PPUD 3 I, Michael D. Rosen, Vice Pres/dent, Sunco Building Corporation, being first duly sworn, depose and say that Sunco Building Corporation is the contract purchaser of the property described herein and which is the subject manet of the proposed hearing; that ~ll the ~'ers to the questions in this application, and a/l sketches, data, and other rupplementary mat~er attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best ofmy knowledge and belief. I unde,siand this application must be comp/'cte and accurate before a hearing can be adver6sed. I further permit the undersigned persons to act as my tepresentatlves in any matters regarding this Petition. Sunco Building Corporation Senior Vice President Wilson, Miller, Barton and Peek, Inc. George L. Vamadoe Young, van Assenderp and Vamadoe, P.A. STATE OF FLOR/DA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Application was acknowl as iden ' ' ~ ,0,no ~s persona,¥ ~own lo -- ---' ts ~_.~ficat~on and who die'did not)~c~ oa"- me. or who has produced .. _ 1996, AGENDA 17EM ~ ,JAN £ 8 1997 '19'96. ~"07720101MCP 72-07.01 .PPUD 4 ISLANDWALK A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 705± Acres Located in Sections 33 and 34 TownsMp 48 South, Range 26 East Collier County, Florida PREPARED FOR: SUNCO BUILDING CORPORATION 3600 Vanderbilt B~ach Road Extension Naples, FL 33999 PREPARED BY: WILS(SN, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 33942 1-~72-07-0! PPUD DATE FILEI DATE APPROVED BY CCP( DATE APPROVED BY BC( ORDINANCE NUMBEI~ TABL£ OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, & GENERAL DESCRIPTION SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SECTION III RESIDENTIAL SECTION IV TOWN CENTER SECTION V WETLAND CONSERVATION AREA EXHIBIT A ISLANDWALK MASTER PLAN (WM~&P File No. RZ-247) ii 1-1 2-I 3-1 4-1 5-1 01~317 1-0772-~?-01 PPUD JAN ~ 8 1997 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The purpose of this section is to express the intent of the Sunco Building Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Sunco or the Developer, to create a Planned Unit Development (PUD) on 7054- acres ofland located in Sections 33 and 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The name of this Planned Unit Development shall be IslandWalk. The development oflslandWalk will be in substantial compliance with the plan-ting goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan. The development will be consistent with the growth policies and land development regulations adopted thereunder of the Growth Management Plan Future Land Use Element and other applicable regulations for the following reasons: The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use Residential Dislrict as identified on the Future Land Use Map as required in Objective 1, of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). The purpose of the Urban Mixed Use Residential District is to provide for higher density residential uses in an area with relatively few natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. The proposed residential density of IslandWalk is three (3) units per acre and less than the maximum density permitted by the FLUE Density Rating System and is therefore consistent with FLUE Policy 5.1. The entire subject property qualifies for a base density of four units per acre. The retail and services uses proposed for the IslandWalk Town Center meet the criteria of the PUD Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict as o0tlined in the FLUE, and therefore, are consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the following reasons: Ao The Town Center commercial uses are more than two (2) miles flora the nearest activity center or PUD neighborhood commercial often (10) acres or more in size. B. The Town Center commercial uses will be developed on fifteen (1 $) acres or less. Co The frontage/depth criteria is not applicable since the commercial area has no true road frontage being located internal to the project. o Due to the internal' ~rientation, types of uses, and multi-purpose function of the Town Center, the County waives the limitation that 50% of the residt permits must be issued prior to development of the Town Center retail IslandWalk is compatible with and complementary to existing and future sun uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE. with apt ~mprovements are planned to be in substantial cclmpliance development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 ofthe FLUE. Ol ~}.'~1 -W.,077201a~ AU 1.0772-0?.01 PPUD ii The development of lslandWalk will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policies 3.1.H and L of Ore FLUE. IslandWalk is a large scale functionally interrelated community, and is planned to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination as set forth in ~e Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) Planned Unit Development District. SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "ISLANDWALK PLANNED UNIT DE% ELOPMENT ORDINANCE". 01~)3/97 -W-0772014.1 AU 1-0772~?-01 PPUD I11 JAN 2 8 1997 SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to set forth the legal description and ownership of lslandWalk, and lo describe the existing condition of the property proposed to be developed. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All of Section 33, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest I/4 of Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, subject to an easement for public road right-of-way over and across the West 30 feet thereof and the South 30 feet thereof'. AND The South 1/2 ofthe Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 34, TownsMp 4g South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, and subject to an easement for public road fight-of. wa), over and across the West 30 feet thereof. AND The North 1/2 ofthe Northwest I/4 ofthe Southwest I/4 of Secdon 34, Township 4g south, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; and subject to an easement for public road right-of- way over and across the North 30 feet thereofand the West 30 feet thereof. LESS AND EXCEPT: The following described propen3' situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida: The South 170 feet of Section 33, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, andi feet of Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East; by Order of Taking,! 1456-CA-01-HDH, recorded in OR Book 1215, Page 1662. 01K)3~9~-W-G'~?2014~ ALJ 1-0772.C?.01 PPUD I-! EN -- 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSItlP The subject property is currently under the equitable ownership or control of Sunco Building Corporation, or their assigns, whose address is 3600 Vanderbilt Beach Road, Naples, FL 33999. Detailed ownership information is provided on Attachment 4-1 of the lslandWalk Application for Development Approval. 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The project site is located in Sections 33 and 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, and is generally bordered on the west by E-Estates zoned, platted and developed property; on the north by Agriculturally zoned and undeveloped land and by PUD zoned and developing property; on the ea~ by Agriculturally zoned and unplatted property; and on the south, across Vanderbilt Beach Road by E-Estates and Agriculturally zoned property. The location of the site is shown on Map A of the IslandWalk Application for Development Approval. The zoning classification of the subject property at the time of PUD application is A (Rural Agricultural), with a small wetland area being designated A-ST (Special Treatment). Co Elevations within the site are approximately 12 feet-NGVD. Per FEMA Firm Map Panels No. 120067 0215D and 0425D, dated June 3, 1986, the IslandWalk property is located within Zones "X" of the FEMA flood insurance rate. Topographic mapping is shown on Map C of thb IslandWalk Application for Development Approval. The site has been altered through past and current agricultural uses and therefore, was granted a waiver of the requirement of submittal of an Environmental Impact Statement ELS), pursuant to Section 3.8.9 of the LDC. 01~03.~7 .W-0772014~ Al2 1.0'~72.O?.OI PPUD The soil types on the site generally include Holopaw fine sand, Malabar fine sand, Riviera limestone substratum, Copeland fine sand, Pineda fine sand, and Boca limestone substratum. Soil Conservation Service mapping of soil types is shown on Map E of the IslandW. alk Application for Development Approval. Prior to development, vegetation on site primarily consists of activ( fields, including agricultural facilities. One isolated wetland systen located on the northeast portion of the project site. This system is p~ willow with most cypress occurring offsite. This system has been distu activities, such as farm ditching and berming, and exotic invasiot vegetation mapping is shown on Map ,F of the IslandWalk Ap! Development Approval. !-2 1.5 1.6 The project site is located within the Main Golden Gate System, 1-75 Canal sub- basin, as depicted within the Collier County Drainage Atlas (May, 1990). The Stormwater Management Master Plan is shown on Map I of' the IslandWalk Application for Development Approval. DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Due to its scope, IslandWalk has been reviewed and approved by Collier County pursuant to Section 380.06, EI.~, as a Development of Regional Impact (DP, I). DENSITY Ao Acreage of IslandWalk is approximately 705 acres and the number of dwelling units authorized to be built pursuant to this PUD is 2,100. The gross project density, therefore, will be a maximum of 3.0 units per acre. Bo At all times all property included within IslandWalk as described in Section 1.1 shall be included in determining project density. 0l '0.lq? .W,.0~7201,~.~ ALI I-0T/2-0~'.,01 PPUD 1-.1 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2.1 2.2 2.3 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the plan of development for IslandWalk, and to identi~ relationships to applicable County ordinances, policies, and procedures. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES IslandWalk, a private community, will include a range of single family and multi- family housing along with a centrally located Town Center, which will provide many services and facilities that support its residents, including, but not limited to community meeting rooms, central postal facility, small scale neighborhood retail goods and services, and a recreation and aquatic center. Bo The Master Plan is illustrated graphically on Exhibit "A" (WMB&P, Inc. File No. EZ-247). A Land Use Summao, indicating approximate land use acreages is shown on the plan. The location, size, and configuration of individual tracts shall be determined at the time of Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval with minor adjustments at the time of Final Plat approval, in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2, of the LDC. COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES Ao Regulations for development of lslandWalk shall be in accordance with the contents of this PUD Ordinance, and to the extent they are not inconsistent with this PUD Ordinance, applicable sections of the LDC and Collier County Growth Management Plan which are in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorizes the construction of improvements, such as but not limited to Final Subdivision Plat, Final Site Development Plan, Excavation Permit and Preliminary Work Authorization. Where this PUD Ordinance does not provide developmental stmdards, then the provisions of the specific sectioh of the LDC that is otherwise applicable shall apply. 01/03~97 Unless otherwise defined herein, or as necessarily implied by definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth effect at the time of development order application. Development permitted by the approval of this PUD will, be subject to 'PuNic Facilities Ordinance, Division 3.15 &the LDC. 2-1 Unless modified, waived or excepted by this PUD or by subsequent request, the provisions of other applicable land development c. odes remain in effect with respect to the development of the land which comprises this PUD. All conditions imposed herein or as represented on the IslandWalk Mas~er Plan are pan of the regulations which govern the manner in which the land may be developed. The Subdivisions Division of the LDC (Article 3, Division 3.2) shall apply to IslandWalk, except where an exemption is set forth herein or otherwise granted pursuant to Land Development Code Section 3.2.4. The Site Development Plans Division of the LDC (Article 3, Division 3.3) shall apply to IslandWalk, except where an exemption is set forth herein or othera'ise granted pursuant to Land Development Code Section 3.3.4. For purposes of the various impact fee ordinances, residential uses, other than the conventional single family detached dwellings, shall be classified as either muhi- family or condominlum/townhouse in accord with definitions of the applicable impact fee ordinance. 2.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Ao The developer may elect to establish the IslandWalk Development District (CDD) to provide and maintain infrastmcttire and community facilities needed to serve the Project. The CDD will constitute a timely, efficient, effective, responsive and economic way to ensure the provision of facilities and infrastructure for the proposed development. Such infrastructure as may be constructed, managed and financed by the CDD shall be subject to, and shall not be inconsistent with, the Collier County Growth Management Plan and all applicable ordinances dealing with planning and permitting oflslandWalk. B. The land area is amenable to infrastructure provision by a district that has the powers set forth in the charier ora Community Development District under Section 190.006 through 190.041, Florida StatuteS. Such a district is a legitimate alternative available both to t}m County and to the landowner for the timely and sustained provision of quality infrastructure under the terms and condition,. ,~c r~,,,,,, development approval. 2.5 SUBSTITUTIONS TO DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ROADWAYS 'JAN 2 8 1997 A. Roadways within lslandWalk may be included as one of the cr D .prqvj.ded {~ infrastructure improvements. Standard~ for roads shall be in corn applicable provisions of LDC regulating subdivisions, unless otbe 5.-[ waived or excepted by this PUD or approved during Preliminary St~bdivisi0n~:~ approval. The Developer reserves the fight to request substitutions to Code design standards in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2 of the LDC. The Developer retains the fight to establish gates, guardhouses, and other access contzols as may be deemed appropriate by the Developer on all privately owned and maintained project roadways and roadways built and/or maintained by the IslandWalk CDD. Roadways within lslandWalk shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Section 3.2.8.4.16 of the LDC with the following substitutions: Street fight-of, way width: The minimum fight-of-way width to be utilized for a local street shall be fifb/($0) feet, unless a substitution is approved allowing a nan'ower width. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall be 2,100 feet. When islands are to be installed within a cul-de-sac, an inside edge ofpavement radius of no greater than twenty (20) feet shall be required. Intersection radii: Street intersections shall be provided with a minimum of a twenty-five (25) foot radius (face of curb) for all internal project s'a'eets and thirty-five (35) foot radius for intersections at project entrances. Reverse Curves: Tangent shall not be required between reverse curves on any project streets. 2.6 LAKE SETBACK A~ND EXCAVATION An excavation permit will be required for the proposed lakes in accordance with Division 3.5 of the LDC and SFWMD rules. The lake setback requirements described in Section 3.5.7.1 of the LDC may be reduced with the administrative approval of the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator. Commercial excavation and off-site hauling of up to 500,000 cubic yards of excess of rock and fill materials shall be a permitted use within this PUD subject to the receipt of a commercial excavation permit which shall be administratively processed by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator. Al! lakes greater than two (2) acres may be excavated to the maximum .commercial excavation depths set forth in Section 3.5.7.3. !. 2.7 USE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY Utilization of lands within all project fights-of-way for landscaping,.decora ways, and signage shall be allowed subject to review and administrative apl~ Developer and the Collier Count), Development Services Director for cng safety consid,erations during the development review process and prior !o any i~ ve entrance ovad qd e8 1997 '~eering andf_,2,, ;tallatii~s / 01,'0~,'~7 .W.0772014.~ ALJ 1-'0772-07.~1 PPUD 2-3 2.8 MODEL HOMES/SALES CENTERS/SALES OFFICES/ CONSTRUCTION OFFICES Model homes, sales centers, sales offices, construction offices, and other uses and structures related to the promotion and sale of real estate such as, but not limited to, pavilions, viewing .platforms, gazebos, parking areas, tents, and signs, shall be permitted principal uses throughout IslandWalk. These uses may be either wet or dry facilities. These uses shall be subject to the requirements of Section 2.6.33.4 and Section 3.2.6.3.6, of the LDC, with the exception that the temporary use permit shall be valid through the life of the project with no extension of the temporary use required; provided that the same shall not be located adjacent to previously developed and conveyed residential units. These uses may use septic tanks or holding tanks for waste disposal subject to permitting under F.A.C. 10D-6, and may use potable or irrigation wells. 2.9 CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Changes and amendments may be made to this PUD Ordinance or PUD Master Plan as provided Lq Section 2.7.3.5 of the LD¢. Minor changes and refinements as described herein may be made by the Developer in connection with any type of development or permit application required by the LDC. The Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator shall be authorized to approve minor changes and refinements to the lslandWalk Master Plan upon ,,Tit'ten request of the Developer. A. The following limitations shall apply to such requests: The minor change or refinement shall be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the IslandWalk PUD document. o The minor change or refinement shall meet the criterion of Section 380.06(19)(e)2., Florida Statutes, and shall not require a determination and Public Hearing pursuant thereto. The minor change or refinement shall not constitute a sul pursuant to Section 2.7.3.5.1. ofthe LDC. The minor change or refinement shall be compatible with ad and shall not create detrimental impacts to abutting lar management facilities, and conservation areas within or exten The following shall be deemed minor changes or refinements: 01G.ltg? -W4)~72014~ ALI 2-4 [cen~g~sl~3[t7 d uses, water ~al to tI~.PUD. ~.~2.- Recordigurafion of lakes, ponds, canals, or other water management facilities where such changes are consisten! with the criteria of the South Florida Water Management District and Collier County. Intemal realignment of rights-of-ways, other than a relocation of access points to the PUD itself, where no water management facility, conservation/preservation areas, or required easements are affected or otherwise provided for. Reconfiguration of residential parcels when there is no encroachment into the conservation area. Minor changes and refinements as described above shall be reviewed by appropriate Collier County staff to ensure that said changes and re£mements are otherwise in compliance with all applicable County Ordinances and regulations prior to the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator's consideration for approval. Approval by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator of a minor change or refinement may ~x.,-,u' independently fi.om and prior to any application for Subdivision or Site Development Plan approval, however such approval shall not constitute an authorization for development or implementation of the minor change or refinement without first obtaining all other necessary County permits and approvals. 2.10 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE 2.11 Most common area maintenance will be provided by the CDD or by a Property Owner's Association. The CDD is a legitimate alternative for the timely and sustained provision of quality common area irtfrastruc~e and maintenance under the terms and conditions of a County development approval. For those areas not maintained by the CDD, the Developer will create a property owners association or associations, whose functions shall include provision for the perpetual maintenance of common facilities and open spaces. The CDD or the property ovmers association, as applicable, shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance, and management of the surface water and stormwater management systems and reserves serving IslandWalk, in accordance with the provisions of Collier County Ordinance 90-48 and Resolution 90-292, together with any applicable pen South Florida Water Management District. LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a throughout IslandWalk. The follo"wing standards shall apply: A. Landscape berms shall have the following maximum side slopes: 2.$ 01,~q? 1-0772-07-01 PPUD 2. 3. 4. Grassed berms 3:1 Ground covered berms 3:1 Rip-Pap berms I: ! Structural walled berms, venical Fence or wall maximum height: seven feet (7'), as measured from the £m~shed floor elevation of the nearest residential structure wi~n the development. If the fence or wall is consm~cted on a landscape berm, the wall shall not exceed six feet (6') in height ~'om the top of berm elevation for berm elevation with an average side slope of 4:1 or less, and shall not exceed six feet (6') in height from the top of berm elevation for berms with an average s~de slope of greater than 4:1 (i.e. 3:1). Landscape buffera, ben'ns, fences and walls may be constructed along the perimeter of the IslandWalk PUD boundary prior to preliminary subdivision plat and site development plan submittal. Ail such areas must be included in a landscape easement or tract on final plats, or identified in a separate recorded instmment. Do Fences and walls wl'~ch are an integral part of secttdty and access control structures such as gate houses and control gates shall be subject to the height limitations for principal residential structures. In the case of access control structures witt~n right- of-ways adjoining two or more different districts, the more restrictive height standard shall apply. Pedestrian sidewalks and/or bike paths, water management' systems, drainage structures, and utilities may be allowed in landscape buffers. Landscape berms located within the IslandWalk PUD boundary and contiguous to a property line and/or fight-of-way line may be constructed such that the toe of slope is located on the property line and/or right-of-way line. 2.12 FILL STORAGE Fill storage is generally permitted as a principal use throughout IslandWalk. Fill material generated from properties owned or leased by the developer may be transported and stockpiled within areas whi~:h have been disturbed/farmed. Prior to stockpiling in these locations, the developer shall notify the Community Development and Services Administrator per Section 3.2.8.3.6. of the LDC The following apply: A. Stockpile maximum height: forty-five feet (45') B. Fill storage areas in excess of five feet (5') in height shall be developed areas by fencing, excavated water bodies or other physic~ side slope of the stockpile is steeper than 4 to 1 (i.e. 3 to 1). 2-6 01~03,~'~ -9/-07?20115 All 1-07'72-0'/.01 PPUD 'JAN 1997 C. Soil erosion control shall be provided in accordance with LDC Division 3.7. 2.13 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS go The Collier County Planned Unit Development District is intended to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership or control, as set forth in the LDC, Section 2.2.20.3. IslandWalk is planned as a private, functionally interrelated community under unified control. The Developer has established community-wide design guidelines and standards to ensure a high and eo~istent level of quality for community features and facilities, which include features and facilities such as landscaping, hardscape, waterscapes, signage, lighting, pedestrian systems, bicycle paths, pavement treatments, roadway medians, fences, walls, buffers, berms and other similar facilities. Upon approval of specific design guidelines and standards by the Developer, those guidelines shall be considered as supplemental standards to the requirements of this Planned Unit Development Ordinance. 2.14 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT PHASING Submission, review, and approval of Preliminary Subdivision Plats for the project may be accomplished in phases to correspond with the planned development of the property. 2.15 AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES The site is currently used for active row crop agricultural purposes, and associated and accessory uses thereto. These existing agricultural uses shall be permitted to continue throughout the project site and will be phased out as development occurs within individual parcels. 2.16 GENERAL PERMITTED USES Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the lslandWalk PUD except in the Wetland Con. servation Area. General permitted uses are those uses which generally serve the Developer and residents of IslandWalk and are typi, allypaxll~e~' common infrastructure or are considered community facilities. A. General Permit'ted Uses: g 8 1997 I. Essential services as set forth under LDC, Section 2.6.9.1. ~_ 2. Water management facilities and related structures. PPUD Bo 3. Temporary sewage treatment facilities. Lakes including lakes with bul~eads or other architectural or structural bank a'eatments. 5. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. 6. Community and neighborhood parks, recreational facilities. Temporary construction, sales, and adminis~'ative offices for the Developer and Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access gays, parking areas and related uses. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences and Wls subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.11 of this PUD. Fill storage subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.12 of this PUD. Site filling and grading as set forth in Section 2.23 ofthis PUD. 10. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible. Development Standards: Unless otherwise set forth in this document, the following development standards shall apply to structures: Setback from back of curb or edge of pavement of any road - fifteen feet (I$') except for guard houses, gatehouses, and access control structures which shall have no required setback. 1.077J-07-01 PPUD Setback from property lines: Front: 25 feet (25') · Side: 7 feet (7') Rear: 15 feet (15') Minimum distance between structures which are pan of an arcl unified grouping - five feet (5'). Minimum distance .,between uru-elated structures - ten feet (10'). Maximum height of structures - twenty-five feet (25'). 2-8 6. Minimum floor area - None required. 7. Minimum lot or parcel area - None required. Sidewalks and bikepaths may occur within County required buffers; however the width of the required buffer shall be increased proportionately to the width of the paved surface of the sidewalk or bikepath. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such gandards are not specified herein or within adopted lslandWalk design guidelines and standards, are to be in accordance with the LDC provision in effect at the time of Site Development Plan Approval. 2.17 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS The PUD Master Plan identifies approximately 276 acres included in the Wetland Conservation Area, lakes, and open space/buffer designations. These areas, in conjunction with open space areas included within the Residential District, fully satisfy the 30% open space requirements of Section 2.6.32 of the LDC. 2.18 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS The preservation of the 1.6 acre wetland conservation area shall fully satisfy the requirements of Policy 6.4.6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Collier County Gro,.~J~ Management Plan. 2.19 SIGNAGE A. GENERAL All Collier County sign regulations in force at the time of approval shall apply unless such regulations are in conflict with the conditions set forth in this section, in which case the PUD Document shall govern. Ol.'03,q? 1-0772-0'~-01 PPUD For the purpose of this PUD Document, each platted parcel shall be considered a separate parcel of land and shall be entitled to any sign as permitted herein. Should any of the signs be requested to be placed wil dedicated right-of-way, a right-of way permit must be a approved. Ail signs shall be located so as not to cause sight iihe obstruc AGE I E 2-9 01~03,97 .W.0772014~ ALI 1-0172.07-OI .PPUD All internal project right, of-ways may be utilized for decorative landscaped entrance features and signage subject to review and approval from Project Review Services for consistency with the requirements set forth herein. BOUNDARY MARKERS One boundary marker or monument may be located at each property comer. The boundary marker may contain the name of the subdivision, and the insignia or motto of the development. The sign face area may not exceed 60 square feet in area and may not exceed the height or length of the monument upon which it is located. If the sign is two-sided, each sign face may not exceed 60 square feet in area. o Sign face square footage is calculated by total square footage of name, insignia, and motto only. The setback for the signs from Vanderbilt Beach Road, future Logan Boulevard fight-of, ways and any perimeter property line shall be I0 feet. ENTRANCE SIGNS Two ground or wall-mounted entrance signs maybe located at each entrance to the subdivision. 'Such signs may contain the name of the subdivision, and the insignia or motto of the development. o No sign face area may exceed 65 square feet and the total sign face area of Entrance Signs at each entrance may not exceed 130 square feet. If the sign is a single, two-sided sign, each sign face may not exceed 65 square feet in area. The sign face area shall not exceed the height or length of the wall or monument upon which it is located. The setback for the signs from Vanderbilt Beach Road, future Logan Boulevard right-of-ways, and any perimeter property line shall be I0 feet. Entrance signs may not exceed a height of 12 feet above the finished ground level of the sign site. For the purpose of this pro grade shall be considered to be no greater than 18 inches al crown elevation of the nearest road, unless the wall constructed on a perimeter landscape berm. 2-10 D. TEMPORARY SIGNS Temporary signs may be permitted, and may consist of the following types: project identification, boundary marker, real esuate, sales center identification, and directional. Each sign may not exceed 200 square feet in area. If the sign is two-sided, each sign face may not exceed 200 square feet in area. The setback for temporary signs from Vanderbilt Beach Road, future Logan Boulevard right-of-ways, and any perimeter property line shall be 10 feet. Temporary signs may not exceed 20 feet in height above the finished ground level of the sign site. Temporary signs may remain in place simultaneously with permanent signage until the project reaches 99% build-out. o Temporary signs may be permitted subject to the requirements outlined above. The erection of any temporary sign shall require permitting as emblished within section 2.5.12 of the LDC. Application fees for temporary sign permits shall be the minimum fee as required for a siandard sign within the district. E. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SIGNS One sign, with a maximum of 20 square feet in size, may be located at each construction entrance, to identif~ the entrance as such. No building permit is required. Employment signs with a maximum of 20 square feet in size, may be located at each construction entrance, to advertise for construction trades. No building permit is required. F. INTERNAL SIGNS 01 ~3.'9'~ .W.0'~72014,S ALJ Residential directional or identification signs may be allow, the subdivision. Such signs may be used to identi~y the direction of approved uses such as models or model sales house, recreational areas, etc. Individual signs may be a m square feet, per side in size, or signs maintaining a common theme may' be combined to form a menu board with a maximt square feet per side, and a maximum height of g feet. No bu is required. 2-11 Commercial directional or identification signs may be allowed internal to the subdivision. Such signs may be used to identify the location or direction of approved uses such as sales centers, information centers, Town Center, or the individual components of the development. Individual signs may be a maximum of 6 square feet per side or signs maintaining a common architectural theme may be combined to form a menu board with a maximum size of 64 square feet per side and a maximum height ofg feet. No building permit is required. The developer may have Real Estate signs with a maximum size of 4 square feet per side in residential districts. Such signs may advertise "For Sale", "Sold To", "Lot #", etc. No building permit is required. Special Event signs not exceeding 32 square feet per side in size may be displayed to announce or advertise such temporary uses as open houses, community fairs or programs or any charitable, educational event. Such sign shall be located no closer than 15 feet to any property line. No building permit is required. Grand Opening signs: The developer may display an on-site grand opening sign not exceeding 32 square feet on a side, and not exceeding 64 square feet total. The banner sign shall be anchored and may be displayed on-site for a period not exceeding 14 days within the first three months that the occupant is open for business. No buildihg permit is required. G. COMMERCIAL SIGNS 1-07~2.0%01 PPUD Wail, mansard, canopy or awning signs: One wall, mansard, canopy or awning sign may be permitted for each single-occupancy parcel, or for each establishment in a multiple-occupancy parcel. Comer units within multiple-occupancy parcels, or multi-frontage single-occupancy parcels shall be allowed three signs, but such signs shall not be combined for the purpose of placing the combined area on one wall. In addition, outparcels within the Tov, a Center may be allowed one additional wall sign facing the Town Cehter if the additional sign is not visible from any road R.O.W. However, the combined area of those signs shall not exceed the maximum allowable display area for signs by this ordinance. AGENDA,iT[M/ The maximum allowable display area for signs may than 20 percent of the total square footage of the vist the building to which the sign ,.'ill be attache,d and ma' case, exceed 250 square feet in area for any sign. 2-12 a) Pole signs: Two (2) pole signs are permitted for each internal street, provided there is a 500 foot separation between such signs. a) b) c) d) Maximum allowable sign area: 100 square feet per side, if two- sided Maximum allowable height: 20 feet Setbacks: I 0 feet from any right.of-way or property line Spot or floodlights may be permitted provided said light shines only on the signs and is shielded from motorists and adjacent residents. Projecting signs: Projecting signs may be substituted for wall or mansard signs provided that the display area of the projecting sign shall not exceed 60 square feet ofdisplay area. a) Projecting signs shall not project more than four feet from the building wall to which it is at,ached. b) Projecting signs shall not extend above the roofline of the building to which it is attached. c) Projecting signs shall not project into the right-of-way. d) Projecting signs which project over any pedestrian way shall be elevated to a minimum height of 8 feet above such pedestrian/my. Under-canopy signs: In addition to any other sign allowed by this ordinance, one under-canopy sign may be allowed for each establishment in the Town Center. This sign may not exceed 6 square feet in area and shall be a minimum ofeight feet above finished grade. H. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic signs such as street signs, stop signs, speed limit signs, etc. may be designed to reflect a common architectural theme. The placement and size of the signs k'ill be in accordance with DOT criteria. 2.20 SIDEWALKS/BIKEPATHS Pursuant to LDC Section 3.2.8.3.17.7, lslandWalk PUD sidewalks/bikepaths as follows: OI ~3~)? .W-07720145 ALI 1-0772-07~! PPUD I A five foot wide gidewalk/bikepath on one side of all streel: 2-13 ~hal,I..IA~o~t~e1997 JAN,,~~...~ 7/ An interaal pedestrian walkway system along the interior lake, permitted within the drainage easement(s). The Developer reserves the right to request other substitutions to Code design st;mdards in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2 of the LDC. 2.21 UTILITIES Ao The Developer may construct the potable and irrigation water services including the tap, service main, and meter box. The County shall install the meter as required. The Developer reserves the right to request substitutions to Code design standards in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2 of the LDC. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission to serve the project shall be designed, constructed, conveyed and/or owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 8g-76, as amended and all other applicable County, State and Federal regulations which might apply. Water distribution and sewage collection and transmission systems shall be constructed throughout the project development by developer and shall be conveyed to the Collier County Water/Sewer District for ownership, operation and maintenance purposes pursuant to appropriate County ordinances and regtilations in effect at the time of conveyance. Eo All construction plans and technical specifications and proposed plats, if applicable, for the proposed water and sewage collection and transmission facilities must be reviewed and approved by Community Development, engineering review services prior to the commencement of development. Detailed hydraulic design reports covering the water distribution and sewage collection and transmission systems to serve the project shall be submitted with the construction documents for the project. The reports shall list all design assumptions, demand rates and other factors pertinent to the system under consideration. G. Ail customers connecting to the water distribution and sewage colle-",.i~., ~~ ,, ,, f~j~_~;)~ T£ - -' to be constructed will be customers of the County and will be County in accordance with the County's established rates. / JAN g8 199-7 H. The on-~ite water distribution system to serve the project shall b~ cot district Water main on Vanderbilt Beach Road. However, there is to connection to the 30" concrete main. The points of connections existing fire hydrant leads abutting the project. The project's 2-14 01~0~17 .W.0'~72014~ AL./ 1-0772-07-01 PPUD shall include a stub terminating with a dead end fire hydrant at the Project's eastern boundary which shall afford the opportunity for a connection of the system with any future system serving the abutting property. No provisions are to be made, however, for the project's system to meet the demand generated by the abutting property; this shall be the obligation of the abutting owner(s). The sixteen inch (16") force main which presently ends at the Vineyards Development on the south side of Vanderbilt Beach Road shall be extended to the point of service connection for the project and the main shall be suitably marked and equipped for future extension. The size of the force main extension shall be that required to serve the service area and the value of any oversizing to serve third parties shall be granted to the Developer as impact fee or system development credits pursuant to an appropriate Developer's Agreement. Jo The sewer system shall be hydraulically analyzed from the project to the County's present North County Wastewaler Treatment Plant and the developer shall be responsible for the upgrade of any Lift Station which according to the report would not operate to the full capacity for which the station was designed originally. The County shall provide the Developer with any and all available design and operational data on the force main system and all pumping stations connected to it and, further, will provide the results of any hydraulic modeling of the system for use by Developer's consultants in the preparation of the report. 2.22 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT The Developer shall cooperate with County staff in the implementation of a master drainage plan for the "Harvey Basin." In that regard, provision for the project to accept or pass through historical flows emanating from Section 27 and those portions of Section 28 and 34 which historically flowed across or around the project, as shovm on Exhibit B (WMP&B's Drawing CEX-333 - Sheets I and 2) hereto, shall be addressed as follows: 014)3 ~/'~ .W-O??~OI4~ All I-~.?-07-01 PPUD The internal surface water management system for lslandWalk and the drainage outfall structure will be designed to accomodate the off-site flows shown, on Exhibit B - Sheet I, as will the specified outfall canal. The Developer will provide connecting piping from lslandWalk's inlemal surface water management system to the connection points Exhibit B - Sheet I. Connection of off-site drainage facili connection points, including off-site control structures, sh responsibility of Collier County. If the County desires to: and is in a position to implement Basin Master Plan, prior to lhe development of those port IslandWalk Project necessary to accommodate said off-site d, by accepting the same into its internal surface water manage: 2-15 shown by JAN 2 8 1997 then the Developer shall grant a "temporary" easement along the north and west sides of the lslandWalk Project (Section 33) at the locations and at the dimensions shown on Exhibit B - Sheet 2. This temporary easement will be granted within thirty days of the County's written request, which request shall not be made until the County has received all applicable permits for the use of said temporary easement for drainage facilities. Said temporary easement or the applicable portions thereof shall be vacated upon the completion of the appropriate portions of lslandWalk's internal system into which the off-site improvements can be connected. The County will be responsible for removing the temporary improvements and to restore the property to its original state at its sole expense. Ail of the foregoing are subject to the County obtaining the necessary easements from surrounding landowners and permits from the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). The Project shall receive credits toward special assessments or taxes ifa MSTBU is established in the amount of the value of any property utilized, or on which easements are granted, and for the cost of oversizing the components of the IslandWalk's internal surface water management system, including the ouffall structure, to accomplish the foregoing in accordance with the LDC Section 2.7.2.8. I. The County agrees that the Developer may fill that portion of the existing Vanderbil[ Beach Road drainage swale within or adjacent to Section 33, provided that the Developer shall be responsible for providing the required water management infrastructure, and designing its internal water managemeni system to accept the runoff from the ultimate roadway section for that portion of Vanderbilt Beach Road adjacent to Section 33 into the lslandWalk Project in accordance with SFWMD criteria. Do A copy of' the SFWMD surface water permit and staff report or early work authorization is required prior to construction plan approval within the IslandWalk Project. Eo Design and permitting of the Harvey Basin Master Plan improvements shall ensure that SFWMD water quality criteria shall be met for all off-site water to be routed through the lglandWalk Project. 2.23 SITE FILLING AND GRADING AarNDA~iT~EM _ The IslandWalk site has ~en previously clewed ~d f~ed. ~ Cq~ym~7 Development ~d Enviromenml Se~ices Administrator may, therefore, a~min~t~,e~yI= approve site alterations which exceed 25 acres in area pursuant lo Section ~2.8.3.6.3., 1.0', 72-o'~.ol PPUD 2-16 2.24 TRANSPORTATION As depicted on the Master Plan, Exhibit A, the developer has reserved a 150' wide R/W corridor along the western boundary of the project for the future extension of Logan Boulevard. The developer has also agreed to accept stormwater runoff from the depicted portion of Logan Boulevard into the Project's stormwater management system in return for road impact fee credits. The value of such road impact fee credits shall be determined pursuant to a Developer Contribution Agreement between the developer and the Board of County Commissioners. The Developer shall provide both an eastbound left turn lane and a westbound right turn lane on Vanderbilt Beach Road at the main project entrance. Such turn lanes shall be in place prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy. Connection permits shall be required for all temporary construction access points. Such permits shall include any necessary auxiliary lanes and apron paving requirements prior to the use of the temporary access point. Any such temporary construction access point shall effectively prohibit internal resident or service traffic from use of the access point. Future access points to the Logan Boulevard Extension not shown on the IslandWalk Master Plan shall be consistent with the Access Management Policy then in effect. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided by the developer at the project's main entrance in conjunction with the development of this entrance. The design of the project's stormwater management system shall not impede the County's ability to improve Vanderbilt Beach Road to its ultimate design section and to provide for required stormwater management facilities. Road impact fees shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 92- 22, as amended. 1-0772-0'/-01 PPUD 2-17 AGE I PI. / ~ SECTION III RESIDENTIAL ~.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within lslandWalk designated on the Master Plan as "R." 3.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS A maximum number of 2100 residential dwelling units may be constructed on lands designated "R." 3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as "R" on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of residential dwelling types, compatible non-residential uses, a full range of recreational facilities, essential services, and customary accessory uses. The approximate acreage of the "R" district is indicated on the PUD Master Plan. This acreage is based on conceptual designs and is approximate. Actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with Division 3.3, and Division 3.2 respectively, of the LDC. Resident/al tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways, open spaces, and other similar uses found in residential areas. 3.4 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: !. Single Family Detached Dwellings. 3. 4. 5. 01t03~9~ -~,'-0~720145 ALI 1.0772-07-01 PPUD Single Family Patio and Zero Lot Line Dwellings. Two-family and Duplex Dwellings. Single Family Attached and Townhouse Dwellings. Multi-Family Dwellings including Garden Apartments. 3-1 JAN 8 1997 Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible in the "R" District. B. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this district. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator. determines to be compatible in the "R" District. 3.~ DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the 'R' Residential District. Site development standards for single family, zero lot line, two-family, and town home uses apply to individual residential lot boundaries. Multi-family standards apply to platted parcel boundaries. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein or within adopted IslandWalk design guidelines and standards, are to be in accordance with LDC in effect at the ih'ne of Site Development Plan Approval subdivision. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. Development standards for uses not specifically set forth in Table I shall be established during Site Development Plan Approval as set forth in Article 3, Division 3.3. ofthe Land Development Code in accordance with those standards of the zoning district which is most similar to the proposed use. 01~)~l'~t .W-0772014S ALJ I-O', 72-O?-01 PPUD In the case of residential areas with a traditional neighborhood development (TND), the TND s~ll be deemed a common architectural theme. Required property development regulations may be approved that are different than those set forth in Table !, subject to approval by the Collier County Planning Commission, in accordance with the criteria contained in Section 2.6.27.4.6.1 througb~ 9 t: '~-t a ~: '~ Ofsectionthe LDC.2.17 of thisC°mm°npUD.°pen space requirements are deemed satisfie .JAN 2 8 1997 SECTION IV TOWN CENTER 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within lslandWalk designated on the Master Plan as "Town Center." MAXIMUM SQUAREFOOTAGE A maximum of 30,000 square feet floor area, including approximately I0,000 square feet of retail uses, 15,000 square feet of service uses, and 5,000 square feet of recreational uses may be constructed on lands designated "Town Center." GENERAL DESCRIPTION The approximate acreage of the "Town Center" district is indicated on the Master Plan. This acreage is based on conceptual designs and is approximate. Actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with Division 3.3, and Division 3.2 respectively, of the LDC. The Tov,'n Center tract- is designed to accommodate internal roadways, open spaces, lakes and water management facilities, and other similar uses found in the recreational, community center, and neighborhood commercial areas. PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitled Principal Uses and Structures: 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 01/03~?. W,O?7201~5 ALJ 1.10'~72.07.01 .ppLrD Accotmting, Auditing and Bookkeeping Services (Group 8721 ). i-/ggg[~l)I.g JAN 2 8 Automatic Teller Machines (Group 3578). Amusements and Recreation Services - Indoor (Groups 79 7993, 7997). Apparel and Accessory Stores (Groups 5611-5699). Gasoline Service Stations (Group 5541). Automotive Carwashes (Group 7542). Business Services (Groupg 7334, 7349). Eating and Drinking Places (Groups 5812-5813) except drive-~ Food Stores (Groups 54 ! 1-5499). 4-1 JAN 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. General Merchandise Stores (Groups 5311-5399). Miscellaneous Retail (Groups 5912-5963, 5992-5999). Personal Services (Groups 7211, 7212, 7215, 7216 non-industrial dry cleaning only, 72 ! 7, 7219-7251,7291-7299). Real Estate (Groups 6512, 6531,654 I). Recreation Services (Groups 7911,7991, 7993, 7997, 7999) Residential uses as set forth in Section 3.4 of this document including residential units integral to Town Center structure(s) and as free standing uses. Free slanding residential uses shall comply with the development standards set forth in Section 3.5. United States Postal Service (Group 43 ! 1 except major distribution center). Video Tape Rental (Group 7841). Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses (including general and professional offices not specifically listed above) and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible in the "Town Center" district. B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this district. Customary accessory uses include, but are not limited to, recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of the permitted uses such as pool, tennis facilities, parks, playgrounds and pla)fields. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible in the "Town Center" district. 4.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Minimum Yard Requirements: 3. 4. 5. 01 ~3'97. W-07720145 ALJ 1-0' 72.07..01 PPUD Front Yard: height, whichever is greater. Side Yard: Fifteen feet (15'). Rear Yard: Fifteen feet (15'). Any yard abutting a residential parcel: Twenty-five feet (25'). Setback fr6m a lake for all principal and accessory uses ma (0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into~ Twenty-five feet (25') minimum or one-half the buildine AB£N Db_IT~£ I~ J~ 2 8 1997 4-2 Co Exterior lighting shall be arranged in a manner which will protect roadways and residential properties fi.om direct glare or unreasonable interference. Maximum height of structures - Fifty feet (50'); except clock towers or similar architectural features, which shall be permitted up to seventy-five feet (75'). Minimum distance between all other principal structures - Twenty feet (20'). Minimum distance between all other accessory structures - Ten feet (10'). Minimum floor area - Seven hundred (700) square feet gross floor area on the ground floor. Minimum lot or parcel area - Ten thousand (10,000) square feet. Minimum lot width - Seventy five feet (75'). Parking for any and all uses and structures constructed in the Town Center District: one (1) space per 200 square feet of building area. Standards for landscaping and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein or within adopted IslandWalk design guidelines and standards, are to be in accordance with LDC in effect at the time of Site Development Plan Approval. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. 01~)~/97. W-07720145 AU 1-07724)?-01 PPUD 4-3 JAN 2 8 1997 PI. ~ SECTION V WETLAND CONSERVATION AREA 5.1 PURPOSE TI:re purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for the area within IslandWalk designated on the Master Plan, as Wetland Conservation Area. 5.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Wetland Conservation Area on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate conservation and limited water management uses and functions. 5.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or st~cture, or pan thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1. Boardwalks and nature Ixails (excluding asphalt paved trails). 2. Water management facilities. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible in the Wetland Conservation Area. 5.4 RESERVE DISTRICT CONSERVATION EASEMENT A non-exclusive conservati~ easement or tract is required by LDC Section 3.2.8.4.7.3 for preservation lands included in the Wetland Conservation Area. The developer, their successor or assign, or the IslandWalk CDD shall be responsible hr th,- ,-.,.,,,--,,~ ,,-~ -- maintenance of lands within the Wetland Conservation Area. No. ~2.] I 1 JAN281997 ! 5-1 01/03/~7. W-0772014~ ALI 1-0772-074}1 PPUD UAN 1 Pg EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PETITION NO. PUD-87-31 (3), COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIR.ONMENT~ SERVICES DIVISION REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GADALETA PUD, ORDINANCE NO. 88-50, FOK THE PURPOSE OF DESIGNATING TWO (2) ACRES OF THE GADALETA PUD AS A COMMERCIAL TRACT, ENTITLED TO ALL OF THE C-2 USES FOR AN AREA PREVIOUSLY ZONED C-2 PRIOR. TO THE AMENDING OF ORDINANCE 88-50. OBJECTIVE: This petition seeks to amend the Gadaleta PUD to restore two (2) acres of commercially zoned land that was inadvertently rezoned when the Gadaleta PUD was amended by Ordinance No. 89-84. CONSIDERATIONS: On September 10, 1996 staff asked the Board of County Commissioners for direction in dealing with the matter of an apparent error in procedure and result when the Gadaleta PUD was amended by Ordinance No. 89-84 having the effect of unintentionally rezoning two (2) acres of land with a C-2 commercial designation. The Board directed staff to prepare an amendment restoring the two (2) acres of commercially zoned land but to include the two (2) acres in the Gadaleta PUD. The method and procedure for accomplishing this action was taken under review by the County's legal staff, who recently advised us as to the proper form of amendment procedure. The Collier County Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 2, 1997 and by a unanimous vote (7 to 0) recommended approval of the action to restore the C-2 commercial acreage and to incorporate same in the Gadaleta PUD. No person spoke or otherwise communicated any opposition to this petition. FISCAL IMPACT: None GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None JAN 2 8 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: ,appr0ved,/./but that further same be made P~,,EPARE~ BY ~J~fA l.~ff~i~ ~1~ O, AICP ~F PLANNER That Petition PUD-g7-31 (3) having the e~ect of restoring two (2) acres of land zoned C-2 be a pan ofthe Gadaleta PUD. DATE REVIEWED BY: ROBERT J. MULHERE, AJCP " CURRENT PLANNIN.~G~tANAGER DONALD W. Am~OLD, A~CP PLANNING S~ER,VICES D .E~A'R~.~NT DIRECTOR '"" \ "',_~ VINCENT A. CAU~'£i~'~, ~D~INIST~'~T. OR DATE3 DATE DATE COMMUNITY DEV. AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS. PUD-87-31 (3) EX SUMMARY/pd 2 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: OWNER/AGENT: AGENDA MEMORANDUM COLLfER COUNTY PLANNING CONflVffSSION COMA4UNITY D£VBLO?MENT SERVICES DMSION DECEMBER $, 1996 PETITION NO: ITEM ?-D PUD-87-31 (3), GADALETA PUD AMEND~ Agent: Community Development and Environmental Services Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 O~,Tler: Domenico and Angela Gadaleta 572 107' Avenue, North Naples, Florida 34108 REQUESTED ACTION: To amend the Cradaleta PUD in response to inquiry that certain errors were made during its adoption and to restore a former C-2 parcel of land to C-2 but incorporate same in the Gadaleta PUD. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The Gadaleta PUD is located on the west side of Old U.S. 41 immediately contiguous the Lee County boundary. . PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; Research on the par~ of staff indicates tha~ a parcel ofland zoned C-2 w~ erroneously included in the PUD boundary description ~nd m~er plan, and the use of this land convened to residential purposes and a temporary driving range during a 1989 PUD Amendment. The owner wishes to have this corrected, by restoring the originally zoned 2 acres of C-2 Commercial Zoning. The BCC concurred and directed staff'to prepare the subject PUD amendment. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Existing: Surrounding: The property currently fim~ions ~s a golf driving range and is zoned PUD. North- To the County boundary line residential communit' development. I ~ a gdlf 7corPse East - To the east the land is industrially developed and zoned Industrial. South -To the south the land is vacant and zoned PUD. West -To the west lies the community known as Sterling Oaks which is actively under development as a PUD zoning district. GROWTH M'ANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: Commercial zoning is inconsistent with the FLUE. Because of errors in the 1989 amendment which had the effect of rezoning the C-2 land this C-2 district was not re. evaluated under the Zoning Re-evaluation Program, nevertheless when staff brought this matter to the BCC's attention they directed that the error be corrected and that the C-2 zoned area be restored but made a part of'the Gadaleta PUD. In any event development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Division 3.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code, adequate public facilities, at the earliest or next to occur of either final SDP approval, final Plat approval, of building permit issuance applicable to this development. HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: Staffs analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area of historical and archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment is required. ANALYSIS: Ordinance Number 89-84 was adopted on November 28, 1989. This .ordinance amended a pre, fious ordinance establishing the C-ada/eta PUD, however, it replaced the legal description with a I _ega{ description that expanded the original 17.28 acre Gadaleta PUD by two (2) additional acres which were also owned by Mr. Gadaleta, and which 2 acres were contiguous to the original OadaIeta boundary and at the time was zoned C-2. Investigation by staff, and in particular a review ofadvenising documents, and the title to the revised C-adaleta PUD failed to identi~y that a 2 acre parcel of land was being rezoned from C-2 to PUD. Clearly, there is no legal documentation that identifies any intention to rezone the 2 acre parcel that was zoned C-2. The title to Ordinance Number 89-84 is inconsistent with the legal description, uses of land and master plan described by the amended PUD language, because the title failed to identify that its action included rezoning land from C-2 to PUD. We cannot explain these discrepancies. We advised Mr. Gadaleta that until this matter is resolved we have no alternative as administrators ofzoning related Ordinances to conclude that we could not honor any claim to allow commercial development on the former C-2 tract of land. Mr. GadaIeta appealed to staffto seek a resolution to this opinion by officially and specifically restoring the C-2 zoning classification for the 2 acre parcel of land. Staff agreed to be the initiator of' this petition in view of the circumstances surrounding the last amendment in 1989. R{;E~ j;r[~ax 2 JAil 2 8 1997 Staff initiated the process for reconsideration by asking the Board of' Commissioners f.or direction and advising them of'what has occurred in the course of'amending the Gadaleta PUD. The BCC directed staff'to prepare an amendment to the Gadaleta PUD which would restore the former C-2 two acres of. commercial zoning however, they also directed staff, to incorporate the commercial tract in the PUD and its accompanying Master Plan. Therefore, the action before the CCPC is one which was directed by the BCC, however since this action is tantamount to rezoning land a recommendation for the CCPC is required. STAFF RECOM'M'ENDATION~ That the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) recommend approval of Petition PUD-g7- 31. (3) for the purposes of. acknowledging that an error was made when Ordinance 89-84 was adopted having the efffect of' rezoning two (2) acres of C-2 zoned land and that this land remain included in the Gadaleta PUD but restored to allow C-2 commercial uses. AICP DATE CFI~F PLANNER RE%~]~V~ED BY: ROBERT J. MUL~, AICP CUR. RENT PLUG ~AGER DON~D W. ~OLD, ~CP ~CE~ k CAIRO, ~~S~TOR COS~TY DEV. ~ ~O~~ SVCS. DATE DATE DATE Per,ion Number PUD-87-31 (3) Sta.ffRepon for J'anuary 2, 1997 CCPC meeting. NOTE: This Petition has been advertised for the January 21, 1997 BCC meeting COLLIER COUNTY PL .~OM]VffSSION: MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN PUG 87-31 (3) STAFF REPORT/pal JAN 2 8 1997 FLORIDA .~. March 25, 1996 URBAN INSTITUTE, INC. Or. Neno J. Spegna, AICP, President 38S0 27th Avenue S.W. Naples, Floddi 33964 Tel. (813) 4SS-2168 Mr. Robert I. Mulhere, AICP Planning & Technical Services Administrator 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 33942 Re: Oadaleta PUD (Ordinance 89-84) Dear Mr. ~uihere: I am wri'tng this Letter in behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Domenico Gadaleta, o~r=ers of the Gada!e:a PUD in order to request a correction of what they believe to be an error in ~ he current designation of the zoning of the northeast portion of the property. This pro[erty in question .-'as rezoned to Commercial Convenience District (C 2) by the Board of County Commissioners in 198.1 (Ordinance 84-27c) and has remained thusl.v ever since. It is shown on the current County Official Zoning Map as part of the Gadaleta PUD rather than as ¢-2° This change pas made without the knowledge of the Gadaletas and first came re their attention Then they responded to a letter from Mrs. Norma ^. Boone dated February 23, 1996 regarding Section 2.7.3.4 of thc Land D~velopment Code (annual report on the progress of development,. Upon inquiry to Mr. Ron Nine, Mr. Gadaleta ~as informed that the subject property had been rezoned from C-2 to a part of the Gadaleta PUD at or about the time that the temporary golf driving range ~as approved by the County Board of County Commissioners. This came as a complete surprise to Mr. Gadaleta as he had never requested such change nor had he ever received any notice from the County of its intention t~ rezone the property In re',ie~,ing the records. I cannot find any Justification for the rezoning of the subject property and can only conclude that an'error ~as made in designating this property as part of the Oadaleta PUD on the Official Zoning Map. I ~ill addresses this matter more completely in the summary of this letter. I ~ent through the County records on March 25, 1996' and again on garch 26, 1996 to get the background information regarding this matter and ~ould like to share it vith you. Exhibit 1. Application for PUD Amendment, page 1.i specifically addresses a PUD Amendment/DO Amendment and makes no reference to a rezone of the subject property. IpIcasc note: Ail rcfcmccs cited arc n0tcd in )'cRow highlight so they can bc easily Planned Unit Developments ,. Cm~lX~heftslYt Plant ,. Zoning .. Lind UI~ PI,ti Transfer of Development Ri,ghtl (TI)R) ·Development. of Re,glonll Iml:mCt Noo ~ ,".,.JAN g 8 1997 I,~... ? Exhibit 1. Exhibit i. Application for PUD Amendment, page 2., paragraph 7 and 8 addresses an amendment only and makes no reference to a rezone of the subject property. Application for PUD Amendment, page 6. (temporary golf driving range layout) addresses an amendment and makes no reference to a rezone of the subject property. Exhibit 2. PUD Document Amendment, cover page, addresses an amendment to the Gadaleta PUD and makes no reference to a rezone of the subject property. Exhibit 2. PUD Document Amendment, Section (3.4.1), page 7. clearly sets forth the nature of the petition to amend the Gadaleta PUD Amendment/DO Document to include ~he temporary use of :he golf driving range and makes no reference to a rezone of the sublet! property. Exhibit 2. PUD Document Aaendment, Section ~ of the Table of Contents addresses the nature of the PUD/DO amendments to the Gadaleta PUD and makes no reference to a rezone of the subject property. Exhibit 2. PUD Document Amendment, Section 5.7., paragraph C. on page 14 acknowledges the existence of the C-2 zoning and makes no reference to a rezone of the subject properly. Exhibit Request for Legal Advertising addresses a request for an amendment to the Gadaleta PUD to allow a temporary golf driving range but makes no reference to a rezone of the subject property. Exhibit Affidavit of Publication addresses a requesting an amendment to the Gadaleta PUD to allow a temporary use permit for a golf driving range but makes no reference to a rezone of the subject property. Exhibit 5. Notification to Adjacent Property Owners addresses a request for an amendment to the Gadaleta PUD to allow a temporary golf driving range but makes no reference to a rezone of the subject property. Exhibit 6. Notice of Posting specifically addresses "Amending Gadaleta PUD' but makes no reference to a rezone of the subject property. Exhibit 7. Activity Log & Summary. The Petition Number and the Petition Type both refer to the Oadaleta petition as a PDA but makes no reference to a rezone of the subject property. Exhibit 8. official Receipt. The Permit Number and the Reference Number both refer to the Oadaleta petition as a PUD Amendment but makes no reference to a rezone of the subject property. 2 AGE D JAN 2 8 1997 Exhibit 9. PUD Amendment agreement., paragraph v.. page 3. acknowledges the C-2 zoning as did Exhibit 2.. preceding. Exhibit 10. Ordinance 89-8~ throughout, recognizes the petition to be a request to amend the Gadaleta PUD to allow a temporary use perntt for a golf driving range. Tour atten:ion is called to the legal description on page 2. This legal description was amended from the original legal description to include the C-2 portion inasmuch as some of the golf driving range would be located on it. It was never the intention of the petitioner to rezone this C-2 portion as part of the Gadaleta PUD and I think this is very apparent due to the fact that nowhere in the petition or its accompanying document is there any reference to re z.~)ning any of the property for ~hich the temporary use permit for the golf driving range is aentioned directly or indirectly by citijet lh¢ petitioner nor the County review agencies or its staff. SUmmARY: Based on the research that I have made concerning this matter Ca copy of which I aa furnishing you). I am unable to find any justification for the re-designation of the C-2 property to Oadaleta PUD on the Official Zoning Map. Inasmuch as the Gadaleta petition only requested an a=endment to the PUD Document to operate a golf driving range and did not involve any rezoning, the Oadaletas are at a loss as to why the re-designation vas necessary or ~hy it was made. As far as I am able to determine from the records, neither the property owner nor the public was ever given notice that the County was contemplating the rezoning of the subject from C-2 to Gadaleta PUD nor rere any public hearings held before the Collier County Planning Co=aission or the Board of County Commissioners. The Gadaletas are anxious to have the Official Zoning Map corrected to reflect the true C-2 zoning status of the subject property as they feel that the current zoning indicated on the Official Zoning Map as 'Gadaleta PUD' is incorect and misleading to anyoned having nee~ to vier the Official Zoning Map. If you have any further questions concerning this request, please call me at your pleasure. Please be assured that the Gadaletas are willing to assist you in any va}- necessary to correct this matter. Copy: Sincerely, For Domenico and Angela Gadaleta Domenico and Angela Gadaleta 3 JAN g 8 1997 ORDINAJ~CB NO. 97- AN ORD]:NANCE AHE~DZNG ORDI'NARCE NU~[BER 88-50, AS AHENDED, GADALETA, A PL~J~iED UN]:T DEVELOPHENT, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTTON ONE, AHF. J~DHEt~TS TO CURRENT ZONING SECTION; SECTION TWO, AHENDMENTS TO HASTER PLAN AND LAND USE SE .CTION; SECTION THREE, AHENDHENTS TO LAND USE REGULATIOtiS FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SECTION; AND SECTION FOUR, EFFECTIVE DATE amended ~o read as follows: 10 W~EREAS, on Hay 24, 1988, ~-he Board of County Conniss[oners of 11 Collier County, Florida, enacted Ordinance Nunber 88-50, vhich 12 established the Gadaleta Planned Un£t Development (PUD); and 13 ~S, on Nove~er 28, 1989, the Board of County Co~issioners 14 approved Ordinance N~er 88-84, ~hich subse~ently a:ended the 15 Gadale=a P~; and 16 ~S, the Co~uni=y Deve~opmen= and Environ=eh=a! Services 17 Division has advised ~he Board of Coun=y Co~issioners of Collier 1~ Coun=y, Florida, of cer=ain on!ssions ~o procedural 19 a==endan~ ~he adoption of sa~d Ordinance Number 89-84 ~hich are 20 reflec=ed in the anen~en=s se= forth belov; 21 NOW, ~EFORE BE IT O~AI~, by ~he Board of 22 Co~issioners of Collier Coun=y, Florida ~ha~: 23 SE~ION O~= ~E~HE~8 TO C~ ZO~NG SE~ION 24 Sec=ion 1.5 en=l~led "~rren= Zoning" of ~he Gadale=a Planned 25 Development, Ordina~=e No. 88-50, as amended, is hereby amended ~o 26 read as follows: 27 1.5 ~rren~ Zoning 28 A. The then ~rent zoning ~s ~F-6.=='.==cc.~ ~ ~, .... --= A-2 29 A~cultural ~ and C-]. 30 SE~ION ~O= ~H~S TO ~ P~ ~ ~ USE SE~ION 31 Section 2.3 en=l~led "Has~ Plan and ~nd Use" of ~e Gadale~a 32 Planned Unit Development, Ordi~ce No. 88-50, as amendS, Is hereby 33 34 Wordme~e~-%t~-e~harm deleted; words und4 PAGE rlin~ ars &dde~l. JAN 2 8 1997 ,,, .... /0 '7 1 2 3 4 S 6 ? 8 10 11 12 13 16 17 2O 21 22 23 2? 28 30 2.3 Master Plan and Land use ~ ~ ...... z-z--lO.~ A. The site plan consists of ~ ...... ~:rc= :..:~ ~9.28 acres of land. ~hich for the ~ur~ose this p~C) are divided into two tracts. · & B beina 17.28 and 2.0 acres res~ectivel~, o-mn =-=~= '--'''-'-- Tract 'A" shall be devoted to residential uses as hereinafte~ ~scrihed. while tract "S" shall be devoted to commercial u~ as hereinaffter described. C. Exhibit "A~. PUD Master Plan. constitutes the re=uired PUD Development Plan. SECTZON THREE: A~END~LENTS TO LAND USE REGULXTZONS FOR THE ~UB~£CT PROP£~TY ~ECTXON Section 3,2 entitled "Pernitted Principal Uses And Structures" of the Gadaleta Planned Unit 0evelopment Ordinance No. 85-50, as amended, is hereby auende~ to read as follows: 3.2 Pernitted Principal Uses and Structures Tract A A. No building or structure, or part thereof shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, An whole or in part, for other than the following: 1) ~ulti-Family Residences. 2) Group housing, patio housing and cluster housing. (Development Plan Approval required - see Section 10.5 o! Zoning Ordinance). 3)To~n Houses {Development Plan Approval required - See Sectiom 10.5 of Zoming Ordinance). 4) Ten (10) percent of the dwelling units constructed within Parcel "A" as shown on the conceptual maste~ PAGE 2 1 4 ~ ' "r" "~ ~ 5 ~ ~...~ . ~-. . .~,-~ . --T .-.:.:,..--:-~. '. -. 16 ~_~ ~.,, _.:_ ~. 17 _ .., ' - -~'~'~"~' ' ~ -. - ' '.'~-~ 2o 2[ · : 22 - : 23 .. . .... ' ....... 24 .... .....= ' - -'~.- '' ~-' '." ' .., 28 -.-~.~ "' ' =~-.~ 2 9 Affordable Housing Section of ~he Comprehensive Plan as vas agreed to es ·tasult of the approval of Petition R-84-26C. 5) Hodel home un£ts shall be per~itted in con~unction with the promotion of the development. Such model hone units shall be converted to residences upon the completion of the pro~ect unless o~herw~se specifically approved by the County. Tract B ~r~ct B shall not exceed an area o~ two acres and may be developed with any of the uses listed under the C-2 zontna district. Section 2.2.13.2.1 of the Collier County Land Develooment Co~e~ SECTION FOUR= ZFFECTIVE D~TE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED ~ND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Con~issioners of Collier County, Florida, this __day of , 1997. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY ~OP~ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: APPROVED AS TO FORH AND LEGAl. SUFFICIENCY: F,~RJORIE N. STUDE24T ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY GADALETA ORDINANCE/17673 32 33 34 Words ~ are deleted; vords underlin: ,JAN 213 1997 EXECL~IVE S~Y AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FUNDING FOR THE JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER AND SUSPENSION PROGRAM THROUGH COUNTY DELINQUENCY PREVENTION FINES PURSUANT TO SECTION 775.0833, FLORIDA STATUTES, AS AMENDED BY CHAPTER 96-382, LAWS OF FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR A MANDATORY COST OF THREE DOLLARS ($3.00) TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST EVERY PERSON CONVICTED OF A VIOLATION OF A CRIMINAL STATUTE, A MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY ORDINANCE, OR A TRAFFIC OFFENSE IN THE COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR THE COURT TO ASSESS THE MANDATORY COST OF $3.00 AND THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT TO COLLECT THE MANDATORY COST; PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF COSTS AND DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS BY THE CLERK TO THE SHERIFF; PROVIDING THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SHERIFF; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 9]~ That the Board consider adopting an Ordinance to impose a mandatory cost for the funding of the Juvenile Assessment Center and Suspension Program pursuant to Section 775.0833, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 96-382, Laws of Florida. CONSIDERATIONS~ During the 1996 Legislative Session, Chapter 96-382 was enacted and became law on July 1, 1996 that enables a county to adopt an ordinance imposing a mandatory cost of $3.00 per case to be assessed in specific cases to fund the Juvenile Assessment Center and Suspension Program. On November 26, 1996 the Board of County Commissioners directed the County Attorney to prepare and advertise for public hearing an Ordinance to impose a mandatory cost for the funding of the Juvenile Assessment Center and Suspension Program. On January 14, 1997 the Board approved the reconsideration of the ordinance and directed the ordinance be readvertised for public hearing on January 28, 1997. FISCAL IMPACT: By adoption of this Ordinance, there will be no negative impact. It is estimated that this Ordinance will generate up to $50,000.00 depending on the interpretation of law by the Courts. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board consider adopting the attached Ordinance imposing a mandatory cost of $3.00 per case to be assessed in specific cases to fund the Juvenile Assessment Center and Suspension Program. ' ' Weigel County Attorney Date: r / AGENDA]TEN~ Jm] 2 19':t7 I Pg., CLERK []g COUi~l S Fax:941-//b-2/55 Dec b '~7o lo:zu COLLIER COUNTY JU¥~Nrr.E .,A~SESSI~ENT CENTER INT~RAG£NCY AGI~EM~NT This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the State of Florida, Department of Juvenile Justice, District Eight; the Colli~ County Courts; the Collier County Clerk of the Court; the Collier County Sheriff, and the Collier County Juvenile Justice Council, Inc. WB:Ea~AS, all parties are committed to!tproviding appropriate programs and services to prevent children from becoming at risk and tO. intervene with children already involved in the juvenile justice system; and WImREAS, thc parties to this Agreement desire a maximum degree of cooperation and planning in order to provide for the safety and security of the community and its children; and WEEILEm, during the 1996 Florida Legi.slative Session, Chapter 96-0382 was enacted and became law on ~Iuly I, 1996; adding Florida Statvte, Section 775.0833, and WH:I~R~S, Section 775.0833 of thc Florida Statutes provides in pertinent part: '(1) A county may adopt a man,datory cost to bc assessed in specific eases by incorporating by reference the prov. isions of this section in a county ordinance. Prior to thc adopuon cf the county ordinance, the sheriff's office of the county must be a partner irt a ~ritter, Agreemeht with the Department of luvenile Justice to participate in a juveaoJe assessment center or with the district school board to participate in a sospc~sion program. (2)...the court shall assess court .costs of $3 per case, in addition to any other authorized cost or fi,re, on every person who, with respect to a charge, indictment, prosecution ;:ommenced, or petition of delinquency filed in that county or circuit, pleads guilty, r~olo cont..nde, re to, or is convicted of, or adjudicated delinquent for, or has an ~tdjt~dication withheld for, a felony~misdemeanor, or a criminal traffic offense or ha~ndicapped parking ,violation under state law, or a violation of any municipal or county ordinance, if the violation constitutes a misdemeanor under state law." and; WimgF..iS, the Collier County Iuvcn~.e Justice Council, Inc., through its Juvenile Assessment Center Advisory Committee, and pursuant to Section III C. 19. and Appendix 7 of thc Collier County Juvenile Justice Council, Inc. Comprehensive Plan approved in December of 1994 and amended in Jaly of 1996, and in fxmjunction with the State of Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, District Eight, is developing a luvenile Assessment Centex program for Collier County to be loc~ texl adjacent to the CoLlier County Jail in the Yuvenile Detention Center to be constructed by the State of Florida, De~.'artment of Juvenile Iusfice; and AG ENDAxI"[E'.t , .o. J Pi[.--' .- WHr~EAS, me Sheriff of Collier Coun!~ is a participant in thc Collier County luvenil¢ Iustice Council Suvenile Assessment Center , visory Board; and w~, the panics hereto have r~uested the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida to authorize the Colli&' County Couru through the Collier County Clerk of Courts to impose a mandatory court cosi of Thre~ and 00/100 Dollars ($3.00) per case authorized by and pursuant to Section 775.0~33 of the Florida Statues; and WI-I:E~AS, the parties hereto wish to p ,rovide for the use and disposition of said funds so Wmi~t,v./,s, all parties mutually agree that all obligations stated or implied in this A§reement shall be interpreted in light of, and consistent with, governing state and federal laws; Now, TImREFORE in consideration of ithe following agreements, the parties do hereby covenant and agra: to the following: 1. This Agreement shall be in effect'as of the date the Agreement is signed by the last of the parties hc-reto. 2. Upon and aftr..r approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as provided above, said ~unds collected by the Collier County Clerk of the Court pursuant to Section 775.0833 of thc Florida Statutes and Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, will be: held in a designated account for said funds'to be established by the Collier County Clerk of Court. 3. Said funds shall be disbursed by .thc Collier County Clerk of Court to the Collier County Sheriff for implementation and operational needs of the Collier County luvenile Assessment Center. 4. Modification of this Agreement shall be made only by a written document s:tting forth the modifications, signed bY all parties hereto. 5. All panics to this Agreement acknowledge that this Agreement does not preclude or · I preempt each of the parties hereto, individually entering into an Agreement with one or mo~ parties to this Agreement or other parties outside of this Agreement. Such agreements shall not nullify the force and effect of this Agree-merit. IN WrrNF..ss WHEREOF, the parties h .eTeto have set their hands and seals on the day and yem' set forth herein. STAT~ OF FLOR/DA, DEPAR~ OF ~ mS~C~, Dm~.~CT ~G~rr D~: Nov~nb~'. , 1996 Edw'~rd '~Jl~" Buff DL~trlct Eight, District l~m~§er COLLIER COUNTY IUVENILE COb'NCIL, INC. Dart. d: November_ , I996 -3- D~ttcd: November.~, 1996 Dat~xi: Novcmbcr.~, 1996 Dated: November~, 1996 COLI..~COUNTYC~OFCOURT W-~ht ~Bmck, COLLIER COUNTY CIRCUTI'COURT Baker, Administrative Judge COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE D o n"n"TZ~ tr~.,~ h e rk ff t4o.~/ 3;,?i 2 ~6 ~S37 1 2 4 6 ? 9 10 11 ORDIN~J~CE NO. 97-__ AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FUNDXNG FOR THE PROGRAH TEROUGH COUNTY DELINQUENCY PREVENTION FXNEB PURSUAA'T TO SECTION ?75°0833; FLORIDA STATUTES, AS ANENDED BY CHAPTER 96-302; hAWS OF FLORIDA; PROVXDXNG FOR A HAlqDATORY COST OF THREE DOLLARS ($3.00) TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST EVERY PERSON CONVICTED OF & VIOLATION OF A CRIXIN~J, STATUTE, A NUNICIYAL OR COUNTY ORDINANCE, OR A TR3~FIC OFFENSE IN TEE COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR THE COURT TO ASSESS THE MAJ~DATORY COST OF $3.00 ~tNDTHE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT TO COLLECT THE MANDATORY COST; PROVIDING FOR %'HE COLLECTION OF COSTS AND DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS BY THE CLERK TO THE 8HERIFF; PROVIDING THE REHPONSIBILZTZES OF THE SHERIFF; PROVIDING FOR CONFLZCT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS ~ND ORDINANCES; kND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 12 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, 13 Florida, ts authorized pursuant to Section 775.0833, Florida 14 Statutes, as amended by Chapter 96-382, Laws of Florida, to adopt 15 a mandatory court cost of three dollars ($3.00) per case on every 16 person who, with respect to a charge, Indictment, prosecution 17 commenced, or petition of delinquency filed in the county or 18 circuit court, pleads guilty, nolo contenders to, or is convicted 19 of, or adjudicated delinquent for, or has an adjudication withheld 20 for, a felony or misdemeanor, or a criminal traffic offense or 21 handicapped parking violation under state law, or a violation of 22 any municipal or county ordinance, if the violation constitutes a 23 misdemeanor under state law; and 24 WHEREAS, Section 775.0833, Florida Statutes, as amended by 25 Chapter 96-382, Laws of Florida, provides that the Clerk of the 26 Court shall collect and deposit the assessments collected pursuant 27 to said Statute in an appropriate, designated account established 28 by the Clerk, for disbursement to the Sheriff as needed for the 29 implementation and operation of s Juvenile assessment center or 30 suspension program so long as the Sheriff's office is a partner in 31 the juvenile assessment center or suspension program; and 32 33 WHEREAS, Section ?75.0833, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 96-382~ Laws of Florida, requires the Sheriff's Office of 2 the County to be a p~-trmr in & written aqreeeent with the 3 Department of Juven~.le .~stice to participate in a ~uvenlle 4 assessment center or with the district school board to participate 5 in a suspension program~ and 6 WHEREAS, the She~if~ of Collier County is a partner in the ? operation of the J.~,~'~e Assessment Center pursuant to Section ~9.0471~ Florida StuLo~$, throuqh the written aqreement with the Department of Juvenile Justice, and is a partner in a suspension 10 proqram developed In con~unction with tbs school board of Collier 11 County; and 12 ~HEREAS, the Clerk of the County and Circuit court is authorized to collec~, deposit and disburse the assessments 14 collected into and out of the desiqnated account pursuant to 15 Section 775.08~3, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 96-~81, 16 Laws of Florida. 17 NO~, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY 18 COP~ilS$ION£RS OF COtl,IEh COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 19 S~C~IO~ O~a. ls~essssnt of Court Costs. 20 The court shall a.;sess court costs of throe dollars ($3.00) 21 per cass, in additto~ tc any other authorized cost or fine, on 22 every person who, w~th respect to a charqe, indictment, 2~ prosecution commen,~.~, .' petition of delinquency flied in the 24 county or circuit court, pleads 9uilty, nolo contenders to, or is convicted of, or adjudicated delinquent for, or has an 16 adiudicatton wlthhelo fo~, a felony or misdemeanor, or a criminal ~7 traffic offense or ta~dt~:apped parklnq violation under state or a violation of any m,mlclpal or county ordinance, if the violation constitutes a misdemeanor under state law. ~0 S~CTIO~ ~10. Collsctloe of Costs and ~lsburssaeat of Funds by t~e Clerk. 32 The Clerk of the Circuit Court shall collect the three 33 dollars ($3.00) cour~ costs assessed by the court and deposit those funds in an appropriate, designated account established by the Clerk. Pursuant to Section ?75.0833, Florida Statutes, the 2 Clerk shall be entitled to five percent (St) of the assessments 3 collected for the costs of administering the collection of 4 assessments. The Clerk shall disburse funds to the Sheriff as 5 needed for the implementation and operation of the Collier County Juvenile Assessment Center and/or Suspension Programs. ? 8 The Sheriff shall request funds from the Clerk as needed to 9 support the implementetion and operation of the Colller County Juvenile Assessment Center or Suspension Programs. The Sheriff 11 shall account for all funds that have been deposited into the 12 designated account by August i annually in a vritten report to the County Juvenile Justice Council. The sheriff may also deposit any 14 other funds obtained by that office for the implementation or 1S operations of the Juvenile Assessment Center into the designated 16 account for disbursement to the Sheriff as needed. 17 SECTION FOUR. Conflict and Beverabllity. 18 In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable lay, the more 20 restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of 22 competent ~urisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, 23 distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not 24 affect the validity of the rsmaintng portion. SECTXON ,lVl. Inclusion in the Code of Lays and Ordinances. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be Lade a 27 part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, 28 Florida. The sections of the Ordinance Lay be renumbered or 29 relettered to accomplish such, and the word 'ordinance' Lay be 30 chanqed to 'section', "article~, or any other appropriate word. 32 33 I This Ordinance ahall become effective upon filing this Ordinance w~th the Department of Stats. Collection by the Clerk of the Court of the $3.00 m&ndatory court cost az described In thle Ordinance ahall commence on February 1~ 1997. PASSED AND DUlY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissionera of CoIlier County, Florida, thai day off , ? 1997. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COHNISSIONERS 9 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLL~K COLLIER COUNTY~ FLORIDA 10 BY: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2? 28 29 30 31 32 33 Approved es to form and legal sufficiency: David -C. We~iqe/~ County Attorne~ TIHOTH¥ L. HANCOCK, CHAI~N EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PETITION NO. DRI-96-1, ALAN R. REYNOLDS, AICP, OF WILSON, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC., REPRESENTING SUNCO BUILDING CORPORATION, REQUESTING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL OF "ISLAND WALK" A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT CONTAINING A MAXIMUM OF 2,100 MIXED DWELLING UNITS; RECREATIONAL , OPEN SPACE, AND COMMUNITY SERVICE ELEMENT, A "TOWN CENTER" PROVIDING RETAIL, RECREATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES; AND MULTIPbRPOSE GREEN SPACE LOCATED ON VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (C.R. $62) BETWEEN INTERSTATE 75 AND C.I~ 951, MORE SPECIFICALLY INCLUDING ALL OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 705 + ACRES. (COMPANION TO PUD-96-14) OBJECTIVE: Pursuant to State Statute this petition seeks approval of a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Development Order. CONSIDERATIONS: The Island Walk development will provide a maximum of 2,100 residential dwelling units, to include both single family and multi-family structures in a controlled access community. The focal point of Island Walk is an internal, centrally located, interrelated recreational, open space, and community service element, consisting of a large lake and green space network that links ali residential neighborhoods via a pedestrian walkway system leading to a "Town Center". The Town Center will provide many retail, recreational, and community services and facilities that support the needs of Island Walk residents and guests, including community meeting rooms, central postal fadlity, neighborhood retail goods and services including a restaurant, a recreation and aquatic center, and multi-purpo~ green space. An impact assessment of the Island Walk DRI has been prepared as required by Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. The DRI assessment is largely based on information supplied in the Application for Development Approval (ADA). The ADA represents a Comprehensive Analysis ora defined ntnnber of questions required by administrative rules that identify the impact of the development upon a ~de range physical, natural, economic and social issues. The ADA in its entirety incttgrmg t~o adff~kx~ sufficiency responses to evaluation criteria was reviewed by all lurisdictional state agencim inclining the southwest Florida Water Management District, Southwest Regional Plarming Councal ~ and local jurisdictional staff' personnel. JAN 2 8 1997 This process concludes with a report of, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning council's official recommendation. These recommendations address each of' the evaluation criteria required by administrative rules and chapter 380, Florida Statutes. These include Energy, Historical/archaeological, Housing, Hurricane Evacuation/Flood plans, Vegetation and Wildlif,e/Wetlands, Solid/H~Tsrdous/Medical Waste, Storm management, Transportation, Wastewater Management/Water Supply, Consistency with Local Comprehensive Plan and General Considerations. These recommendations are then included in the Development Order crafted for local approval. The recommendations were reviewed and approved by the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council on ~ovembe~' 21. 1996 and conveyed to official representatives of.Collier County. The Development Order submitted to staff, upon review includes all of the regionally significant SWFRPC Official Recommendations. It should be appreciated that the DRI Development only addresses regional impacts, however, all DRI Development Orders are concurrently processed with a rezoning application, typically in the f,orm of, a Planned Unlt Development (PUD). Three persons addressed the Commission expressing certain reservations. Copies of' correspondence is included with this executive summary. All community facility and service providers were offered an opportunity to review the Island Walk ADA and to advise staff if, there were any issues within their jurisdiction that required us to seek a development commitment over and above what has been provided in the ADA and the Final Development Order. We received no requests to go beyond the commitment made in the Development Order or that run contradictory to the responses made in the ADA relative to any particular community service. The Collier County Planning Commission heard this petition on December 19, 1996 and unar.;.mously voted to recommend approval to the Board of'County Commissioners. FISCAL IMPACT: This petition by and of itself, will have no fiscal impact on the County. However, if this amendment achieves its objective, the land will be developed. The mere fact that new development has been approved will result in a future fiscal impact on County public fadlities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help off-set the impact of each new development on public f,acilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects in the Capital Improvement Element needed to maintain adopted levels of service for public facilities. In the event that impact fee collections are inadequate to maintain adopted levels of service, the County must provide supplemental funds f,rom other revenue sources in order to build needed f,acilities. With Developments of Regional Impact the owner entity responsible f,or the DRI is required to mitigate regional impacts and to pay f,or proportionate shares of'transportation improvements. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Analysis of this petition as presented and as structure,~ reaching a conclusion that its approval is consistent with 2 hy it~ PUD regulator7 JAN 2 8 1997 do The entire site is located in the Urban Residential designated area, therefore, given availability of supporting infrastructure and market justification its to be expected that authorization would be granted for residential development. Specific provision is made in the FLUE to the OMP for neighborhood commercial centers functioning as an integral part ora large residential development. Development permitted by the approval of' this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance No. 90-24 at the earliest or next to occur of either final SDP approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: Staffs analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area of historical and archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment is required. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve Petition DRI-96-1, as described by the drat~ Development Order Resolution and Exhibits thereto. RONALD NINO, AICP DATE CHIEF PLANNER REVIEWED BY: ROB~RT J. MULHERE, AICP DATE CURRENT Pfi.,ANNI~G MANAGF~ ~"-~, DONAL~,~W. ARNOLD, AICT OA~ ,. C, eO, ,O s ToR DKI-96-1 EX SUMMARY/pd 3 JAN 2 8 1997 e=. ..~ · ~'=. '"' ~ I AGENDA ITEM 7-E MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLUG COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1996 RE: PETITION NO: DRI-96-1, ALAN R. REYNOLDS AICP, OF WILSON, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC., REPRESENTING SUNCO BUILDING CORPORATION, REQUESTING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL OF THE "ISLANDWALK" A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IA/PACT CONTAINING A MAXIMUM OF 2.100 .~flXED DWELLING UNITS; RECREATIONAL, OPEN SPACE, AND COMMUNITY SERVICE ELE~fEN'I'; A 'TOWN CENTER' PROVIDING RETAIL, RECREATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES; AND MULTIPURPOSE GREEN SPACE LOCATED ON VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (C.R. 862) BETWEEN INTERSTATE 75 AND C.R. 95 I, MORE SPECIFICALLY INCLUDING ALL OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND PART OF SECTION 34, TOWNSI-iZP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 705 + ACRES. (COMPANION TO PUD-96-14 ISLANrDWALK) OWNER/AGENT: Agent: Mr. Alan D. Re)molds, AICP W'dson, Miller, Barton and Peek, Inc. 3200 Ba~ley Lane, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 OWTleI'.' Suneo Building Corporation 3600 Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Naples, Florida 34199 No. ~,,) JAN 2 8 1997 --~"~AG£N O& I'[EM Pl. REOUESTED ACTION; This petition seeks approval of a DRI Development Order pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida Statutes and Chapter 28-24, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The term "Development of Regional Impact", means any development which, because of its character, magnitude, or location, would have a substantial effect upon the health, safety or welfare of citizens of more than one county. Fixed thresholds are used to determine when a project rises to a Development of Regional Impact. For Collier County the threshold is 1000 or more housing units, lslandwalk is a project of 2100 housing units. JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW BODIES: Developments of Regional Impact are concurrently reviewed by both the local government and the Regional Planning Council. The Regional Planning Council serves to coordinate the review of state and federal jurisdictional agencies. This review concludes with the Regional Planning Councils recommendations for conditions of approval that should be included in the Development Order which is adopted by Collier County. Both the Regional Planning Council and Department of Community Affairs may appeal a Development Order which is inconsistent with their recommendations. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The area embraced by the lslandWalk community is in the entire section 33, and part of Section 34, Township 48 south, Range 26 East. The land fronts upon the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road having in excess of mile of road frontage. (See location map following page). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; The IslandWaik development will provide a maximum of 2,100 residential dwelling units, to include both single family and multi-family structures in a controlled access community. The focal point of IslandWalk is an internal, centrally located, interrelated recreational, open space, and community service dement, consisting of a large lake and green space network that links all residential neighborhoods via a pedestrian walkway system leading to a "Town Center." The Town Center will provide many retail, recreational and community services and facilities that support the needs of IslandWalk residents and guests, including community meeting rooms, central postal facility, neighborhood retail goods and sen'ices including a restaurant, a recreation and aquatic center, and multi-purpose green space. JAN g 8 1997 By including a variety of services and facilities that meet the daily needs of residents within a short walking distance of their homes, many positive results occur, such as a reduction of demand for automobile trips within and beyond the community, and greater interaction and communication between residents. Inclusion of these land uses fi~rthers the Collier County goals on encouraging mixed uses and reducing impacts associated with new development. The project is planned to be constructed in one six-year phase, with construction anticipated to commence in 1997, and be completed in the year 2002. Tl~s dates are estimates and actual occurrences will be governed by market conditions and economic conditions beyond the control of the applicant. Proposed Land Use Total Acreage Distribution at Build Out LAND USE Residential Town Center Lakes Right-of-Way Cypress Freshwater Marsh Willow Marsh Open Space TOTAL SITE APPROXI2~TE ACRES 363.0 15.0 171.0 51.0 0.1 0.5 1.0 103.0 705± SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLAN~"~G (~OUN(~IL REVIEW: An impact assessment of the IslandWalk DR/has been prepared as required by Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. The DR/assessment is largely based on information supplied in the Application for Development Approval (ADA). The ADA represents a Comprehensive Analysis of a defined number of questions required by administrative rules that identify the impact of the development upon a wide range physical, natural, economic and social issues. The ADA in its entirety including two additional sufficiency responses to evaluation criteria was reviewed by all jurisdictional state agencies including the Southwest Florida Water Management District, Southwest Regional Planning Council staff, and local jurisdictional staffpersonnel. JAN 2 8 1991 . n. '7 \ AGENDA ITEM This process concludes with a report of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Councirs official recommendation. These recommendations address each of the evaluatiov criteria required by administrative rules and chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Thee include Energy, Historical/A~chaeologica], Housing, Hurricane Evacuation/Flood plains, Vegetation and Wildlife/Wetlands, SolicVHa~'-rdous/Medical Waste, Stormwater Manager~,~.nt, Transportation, Wastewater Management/Water Supply, Consistency with Local Compr~;hensive Plan and General Considerations. These recommendations are then included in th~ Development Order crafted for local approval. The recommendations were reviewed and appro', ~.d by the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council on November 21, 1996 and conveyed to official representatives of Collier County. ISLANDWALK DRI-DEVELOPMENT ORDER: The Development Order submitted to staff, upon review includes all of the regionally significant SWFRPC Official Recommendations. It should be appreciated that the DP] Development only addresses regional impacts, however, all DRI Development Orders are concurrently processed with a rezoning application, typically in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The concurrent rezoning action addresses local concerns and conditions of approval. The Development Order also ties the PUD regulatory document into its applicable regulatory framework by citing the PUD as being a pan of the Development Order Therefore, with the passage of both the Development Order (DR.I) and the PUD regulatory document we have development approvals spanning both regional impacts and local require,-,~.:!t', for consistency with the GMiP and LDC. It should also be noted that many regional condi:ioq~ of approval also address local requirements such as environmental preservation and enhancement, transportation and storm water management in panicular. In these cases the regional condition is all inclusive of local requirements for GMP consistency and LDC r .egulations. Local Development Issues - Traditionally, DILl Development Orders include provisions for community facilities and services such as schools, public parks, fire stations, police services and so forth. With the advent of impact fees for each and everyone of these fa,..ii;~cs and services the need to reserve space or otherwise extract a financial commitment diminished allowing greater flexibility in terms of sites to insure that a site for a given community fac;hty was in the best location. In the past, and in the absence of impact fees, sites were chosen t:.at ~vere less optional in terms of location simply because it was expedieat to require an allocaticr, o:"space. Examples of this situation include school sites in Pelican Bay, and Marco Shores that did not fit with optimum locations. With the payment of impact fees those jurisdictional agencies now have more freedom to pick the best sites for the least amount ofdollars. All community facility and service providers w~e offered an opportunity to review the lslandWalk ADA and to advise stalTifthere were any issues within their jurisdiction that required us to seek a development commitment over and above what has been pro:'ided in the ADA and the Final Development Order. We received no requests to go beyond the commitment made in the Development Order or that run contradictor)' to the responses made in the ADA relative to any particular community service. AGENDAITEM~ . JAN 2 8 1997 TAFF RE MME DA · That the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) recommend approval of Petition DRI-96- 1, IslandWalk as described by the Development Order Resolution. CHIEF PLANNER REVIEWED BY: ROBERT J. MULl[ERE, AICP CUP, RE~ PLUG MAN~.GE_g_ . DONALD~W. ARNOLD, AICP' G SERVICES DF,,PT~TMENT DIRECTOR CEI~r A. CAUTERO, ADMINI$'I'~TOR COMMUNITY DEV. AND EN'VIRONMENTAL $VC$. DATE DATE Petition Number DRI-g&.I StaffReport for December 19, 1996 CCPC meeting. NOTE: This Petition has been advertised for the January 10, 1996 BCC meeting COLLIER COUNTY PL~CO~SSION: MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN DRI-96-1 STAFF REPORT/ixl STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING 2740 Centerview Drive - Rhyne Building Tallahassee, Florida 32399 RPM-BSP-ADA-I DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL UNDER SECTION 380.06, FLORIDA STATUTES PART I. Application Information. I, Michael D. Rosen . the undersigned officer of Suneo Building_ Co~oration, hereby propose to undertake a Development of Regional Impact ns defined in Section 380.06, Florida Statutes fi. SO, and Chapter 28-24, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). In support thereofl submit the following information concerning lslandWalk . which information is true and correct to the best of my 'knowledge. (date) Mic/l(ael D. Rosen_, Vice President Suhco Bm'lding Corporation JAN 2 8 1997 ~AG£ND& IT. EM. December 18, 1996 Collier County Planning Commission 2g00 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Dear Commission Members: As a property owner which directly adjoins the proposed Island Walk PUD, I have many concerns regarding the proposed project. In lieu of representing myself as an hysterical property owner, I have reached to individuals that are professionals in the field to assist me in presenting my concerns. Although John Bolt of Storm Water Management may disagree, you must first be brought up to date on easement improvemen~ w:,ich are currently taking place on the 30 feet drainage easement which adjoins both m), property and the proposed Island Walk property. As you will see with miscellaneous correspondence that has been attached, the C6unty las represented this drainage improvement as "existing ditch maintenance." I met with Mr. Clayton Miller on site ofthls prejec~. ~is morning and we walked the entire project together. Neither myselfnor Mr. Miller ever discovered any sign within the 9,000 feet project of an existing ditch measu~ ~ ~'ee~ h~ depth, with a 4 feet width and an eight feet height. It is apparent, and yet to be ,~,,~:.~ ,i d~.~ Collier County represented the ditch which presently exists on the Harvt:~, Bro,.~ Farm. property. South Florida Water Management is reviewing the on going 5rojee~ for possible misrep~tation and/or exemption due to the size of the projecL ~ have, been assured that a written response will be forth coming from South Florida ~ ater Management which will be available for the hearing before the Board OfCount~ Couu~tissioners. Had this been permitted with an Environmental Review, this report co',,dd have impact on the existing Site proposal. We do have, environmentally and habitat sensitive forested edge to the westerly boundary of the proposed Island Walk. As you will see by the correspondenc~ that has been included from Klm Dryden of Florida Game and Fish as well as Mi. Gar:~ Beardsley of Tropical Environmental Consultants, the Cousity through .~h,~ chainage ;.mprovement efforts has destroyed approximately 6+ acres of Big Cypre.-.s Fox Squierel Habitst which adioined the on thc westerly boundary of the Farm will again remove ~[dditi JAN 8 1997 the recommendation of both Florida Game and Fish and Gray Beardsley, that any remaining native vegemion on the existing d~ burrn be preserved and that native Florida plants replace the Brazilian Pepper that is presently in existence. As you see by the enclosed Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Habitat Plan which has been finalized by Pelican Strand, construction activity is prohibited within 100 feet of an active Big Cypress Fox Squirrel nest, and native vegetation is to be preserved. Given the existing Site Plan, a 20 feet buffer is proposed and then the 30 feet easement for the future Logan Boulevard. As is recommended in the report from Gary Beardley, a 100 feet buffer from Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Nests is again reiterated in the Consu'uction Requirements within the Pelican Su'and Managemem Plan. Kim Dryden has indicated in her correspondence that the 20 feet proposed Buffer has little to no value in the protection of habitat. Given the guidelines that are documented in Plans throughout 12 Developments within Collier County, the Site Plan needs to allow for a t least a 100 feet Buffer within the existing native vegetation and forested edge to assure the future protection of active nests against disturbance of n-affic and development. In spe 'aking with Dr. Stephen Humphries at the University in Gainesville and the Graduate Student that is presently documenting Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Habitat on the Hole In The Wall, Royal Poinciana and Wilderness Golf Courses, we may not be able to maintain the existing BCFS Colony within Units 96 and 97 because of the surrounding proposed developments. But to put it in their words, and in full agreement, it is definitely worth a shot! In addition, the presence of Deer, Bobcat and Fox in our area raises another concern. The Site proposal has eliminated any future corridor for the movement of wildlife. Th~s Site Plan, if accepted, will be close the corridor between Unit 96 and Unit 95 (which border the Vineyards to the East) which presently allows wildlife to cross Vanderbilt Beach extension and to continue moving within protective cover. In addition, with the recent loss of the forested buffer for the installation of the drainage ditch, with the proposed Logan Boulevard extension, you have just placed a sense of condemnation on the property owners that adjoin the development. The setback requirements under the Estates District is 10% ofthe lot width or 15 feet, whichever is less. Please be advised that in some existing situations, you will be placing residential improvements within 65 feet ofthe proposed Logan Boulevard. Let it also be known that by the proposals within this PUD/DRI and the defining of this Easement of the proposed Logan Boulevard, you have now placed property owners in the legal position of disclosure of this proposal on the future sale on their property. In speaking with Collier County Roads, the proposal to extend Logan Boulevard is not on the five year plan So therefore, I am disclosing an "unknown" for at least five years. .as a real estate sale professional in Florida, I have reac to assist in estimating of just how much value I am losi~ led to g in JAil 2 8 1997 L_..",. _ ~p] dc · AGEND& ITEM proposed Site Plan. We are raking into consideration the recent easement improvements, the 20 feet buffer and the proposed Logan Boulevard e~ension or the legal need to disclose the same. DOn .lohnson has assured me that there is sufficient hi~orical data to accomplish this task. I am also advising those neighbors whereby their improved s-u-uctures will be within 65 feet of the proposed Logan to have the same Appraisal review completed. The Site Plan is impactinl~ my values less than mos~ as I chose to build my main residence to the Wes~ of my 4.6/acre Trac~. My own appraisal will not be an accurate estimation in comparisons to others property owners. If Logan Boulevard is no longer being considered by the County, then an official letter from the Collier County Government needs to be issued to ALL HOMEOWNERSFLANDOWNERS on the Easterly Boundary of Unit 96 and 97 that this road improvement is not going to happen to eliminate fl~e legal need of disclosure. I have enclosed a letter from Attorney John White which addresses the issue of disclosure based upon the present Site Plan. In addition, a copy of the PUDfDRI Maps which indicate future Logan Boulevard through to the County Line have been forwarded to the Homeowner Associations of Long Shore Lakes, Quail Creek, Quail West and Worthington Country Club. If the setting of this easement is con.f'umation of Logan Boulevard being the new consideration in a north/south corridor, I think their input at the County Commission Meeting for approval of this development is also warranted. The last issue that I would like to bring to you attention is road impact. It is proposing that a traffic light is to be installed at the south entrance to Oakes Boulevard off of Vanderbilt Beach Extension. The present speed limit on Oakes Boulevard, a co~dor which runs north and south in a residential neighborhood, is at present 45 MPH. This is the same speed limit that is on Immokalee Road! Ifyou are considering this travel speed in any traffic assessment, you need to be informed that it is the intention of the Homeowners within Units 96 and 97 to petition the County to reduce this speed limit to a mi~mum of 30 MPH. Orange Blossom which connects Airpor~ Pulling to Goodlette- Frank Road is no different than Oakes Boulevard. The speed limit on that artery is 30MPH. Respec/t~lly submitted, Cathy Graves~roperty Owner $630 16"' Avenue, NW Naples, Florida 34119 (941) 591-2922 JAN 2 8 1997 COLLIER COUN PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION May 8, 1996 Dear Collier Cbunty Property Owner: 3301 g TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FL 33962 (941) 732.2575 FAX (941) 732-2526 A CF.~TIF'IED DL.~"[ CI lip On behalf of the Collier County Stormwater Management Department, please be advised that drainage improvements are scheduled in your area. All construction will take place within the Collier County 30 feet drainage easement along the east edge of Golden Gate Estates Units 96 and 97. The improvements will include clearing the easement and constructing a shallow conveyance ditch to the south connecting to the Vanderbilt Beach Road canal. This project is being undertaken as a result of the flooding your area experience in past years, especially during 1995. By providing a positive outfall route for excess runoff, -this project should improve the area's, drainage capabilities although it is not a sure-fix, i Thank you in advance for your patience as we undertake these improvements. If you have any questions please feel free to call this office at (941) 732-2501 or the Engineering Consultant, Richard McCormick, P.E., of Wilkison & Associates, Inc., at (941)643-2404. Very truly yours, John H. Boldt, P.E.,P.L.S. Stornwater Management Director JHB/mts CC: Thomas E. Conrecode, P.E., Public Works Administrator George F. Archibald, P.E., Transportation Department Director Richard McCormick, P.E., Wilkison & Associates, Inc. Doc: 10107 JAN 2 8 1997 14-- CON 24.06 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: M~et Bi.shop, SupervisLa~ Professional, Fort Myers Service Cemer, Field E~gineerir,,g Division, Rel~ladoz~ Department 4~lerry Kur, z, Area E~eer, Collier County, Field £niineerint Division, Ret'uladon Depzr~ent DATE: .laa-,uary $, 1996 SUB.~ECT: E.~'J~g Ditch Mzlmenmce Eat of O~ B~le,~d ~ilier Coun~ S~c~o~ 29 & ~2/To~p 48/R~g~ 26 Cc~er Co~ S~ re~es~ed o~ ~ce ~ e~u~flon o~ · proposed ~ ¢le.n{~ led~ ~e ~h ~ lo.ted lppro~tely' one (1) ~e (2) ~]~. ~e site ~ ~p~ed on Oaober 1~ 199~. ~e &ich = appro=at~y ~o (2) ~o uhree (3) feet ~eep ~ a fo~ (4) f~t bosom ~d~ ~d ~ e~ht (g) f~t VegetAtion ~o~ i~ ~e ditch ~ si~~ co~g ~inly of Bra~ PepS. ~ proposed ~tch m~te~ ~ h~lp relieve som~ s~eel ~d ~d O~ Boule~d. ~e ~ich ~ l~ed in a ~F dr~ge e~eme~c B~ memo to Co~er Co~ ~~ce Se~ce~ ~eld E~ee~g a~o~e~g~ At~ched: SFWMD DJ[ch Cle--~nlng snd M::~!ntenanco. Su~esdons Clycle..Fu§a~¢, Collier: .CouatT. Complla~co:S~wi~s Stan Chr~nowsld, Colli¢i' County Plan Review F.E. File, Naples AG£~ID_A J:TIr~ x .o. JAN 2 8 1997 AGE:ND& P. 02/05 8:51 PUELIC bl3~l, iS DIVISI~ Fax:941?~22526 Dec !$ '96 ~es Chic are currinc~7 me,dated by Flori~i ~lJc:ac~ve Codes State Statutes. Zn cues where chi cleaning or ~ ce~it~, ch, District hi~l~ ,=couraBaJ l~,cs/mavaCocs Co this ~th chi District's Field lep~asenc/cives'prio~ co chi lcc~ cle~ing/uaceuuc, icCiviC~. .dso, prior to ~iCilCing such the ~oilo~ a) · location ekscch/s~p tdinc~.(7~-_- th- ~p~.c.t~:l~. location and th. f[e~eacl7 is the e~stest ~hod ~ot td~ these a~e~-.) with t~e current amd proposed final widths, tlJN~ciovs i~dir, aced. C)~c. ch. above imfor~acioa is available. Disc[icc staff will be f~ CO meet ~th ~[e proposing ~t cleaning activin. Is ~r~oad ~1~. to ~l~sl it. Either a verbal ~ledie~nc of the upc~; cl.ui~[ ~i1 ~ five= oc ~u~her t~o~cion ~uld be requested, l~ necessa~, Co c~ri~y the tu~l ic~e o~ the proposed worE. l'ae rolls-nS guidelin~s should always be folloved [eSarti~g all .1. ]tt~Cena::~/~xcavaC~m mtsc be L~uLcid to the us deeper chs:: the ~rerqe depth of .a~Jcsu~ sc pl~C rooC zone. c~ssn~u~/ma~nCenLuce effort. · Ptq~.iC WOP~,S DIVI$I~ Fax:9417322526 Dec 18 'g6 8:51 P. 05/05 PA~E 2 Y. Io oC~r m~r£ace v~eLr aLU~~ CO~CXuCC~m OC r~ ac?~v~7 c~u occu~ ~2ehouc pr~or proper ~ppr~vLtCs) £r~m e~_; ~L~tT~cC. 8. A~y p~Ulp~uI of Tater u#cc~tce~ v~Ch ~ ~k Even Chou~ ~e D~sCr~cc enc~rases chis ~ ~canc U~er o~ people do ~r.~...,:~nd e~e~e~e c~s ~ o~ york. -3 ..... ; ~caed chi ~lov~le horde for '~ere~ort, lc ~ i~enc upon eye.one doin[ chis ~ch~ ~lovable bou~e or risk be~[ cited by e~. DisCricc's Sicclon. Zf cited for a 'Surface Vicar ~g~enc~lict~, Ohm res o a~ va ~i do eve~chin. ~...~. ..... [~' p ue concacc ~:rc~es .e~ poinc you ~o [~'~ _~_.~c~7 ~i~ ~our b O~c .... ~-- ~ea~c~ pa~ Y ~cc ~a. ~d h~ecLous, ~h us, please contac~ any of the D~s~r~c~ s Fla~d ~g~neer~n~ D~vh~ou'e ~ert the proposed york i . ...~ ........ f r the geosrlphLc area Atcac euc " JAN 8 1997 12-83-1996 'J · ,J"J 'W1LKISON & ' D~te: To: December 3. 1996 Brace Mdqall 8tormwater Mmag,-~ent Department Kichard H. Mccorm/ck, P.E. ~// Project Engineer Ozkes Drsin~tge Ditch Project Summary end B*ciqlround At your request, a project summary for the above re~ project is provkEd. ~ Oakcs dra/nag¢ dhch project includes the construction of a S,7~0 fi. long swale to collect runoff' fi'om the ~artem zrea of C-olden Cra~e N. st~es Un/ts No. 96 and 97, and to convey th~ ~-unoff'to thc Vmx~rbilt Beach Road ~ It is our ut~ that ttth zrea has been prone to flood/n~/n r~¢ent years and ~ ay= not m/eq~e dral~e fa~es irt pla~e. The flooding ptoble~t h~ beta compotmd~l ha ~ yea~ a~ each ~ home re.long 10~ - 24th Avenues ~ a (lriv,~v~y culveft which ~ a~oped to the ~ I~ccau~ Collier County h~ not ~ the dhch in th~ 30 foot dr~c ~ thc runoff ~ not Bad ~ positive outfalL Stormwuf~r ~eme~ De~'tmc~ Director John ~ot~t, ~sked W'~Ms~n & As~c~tes, Inc., fwd) to ~t~/t a der~n propo~d f~r d~ 8r~gc finprovements. In Fetmmy I99S, W~. ~ ~~ to' ~ ~urv~ ~xl en~uecri~ sc~v~.~, lvfr. Boldt provlcled W,~.A with a lXOpo~ed c~o~-~,ec~on of tho swale eJon~ w~ somc topo~pMc ,~ Joc~Mn ~ wMch h~d alreaSy been completed ~Iong the cas~rl7 potion of Golden O~te Unk~ No. 9~ and 97. W,~r~ · completed the ~wey ~cl design work under Collier Coum'y's d~c~on in Apr~ of 199& · The ColIier County Stomwat. er Mamg~ D~ remahe~ proactive h e//nts to keep the cornnnm~ hfomed of the proposed/mpro~ W~A assured Collier schedule (letter atuchca*). W,~r.A received two tcl~hone cans Jn mtrl~t of the projcct and none in opposition. In mtdition, two landowners were allowed time to x'cce~e their necessary right-of-way pern:~t, ~o ~ COtu:iPy cottld incln(l¢ t)~ culvert con.~l~Lic~Jon in thc Oaf. s drz~zm~e ~ch project EXCHANGE AVE., NAPLES, FL 34104 941-643-24~ DAV1D $. WIU(ISOFI, .~.£ JAMES N. WIU~JON, I Mr. Mct~ll The dep',.h of the proposed swale w~ vary from zero to two ~ ss it extends south from 22nd Avenue 1¢~ to Vand~blk Beach Road.' A tr~velway ws.4 also included for periodic ~i~t~ ~___~x-ss_ to the ~ No ir~cts to th~ a4jac~ hom~ovazrs or the wcr~ proposed ~ all work was fo be ~ thc thirty foot e~e~-.~: To i .r,~acts to tI~ area, all removed trees w~re to ba hauled form si~ or chlpp~d. Thc $ou~h Florida Water M~em~t District ~icwcd the proposed project, and dctc~.~ an erMronm~,T~,! resource perafit was not rcqulrcd. To minimize en~.,'onmcnial impacts, iht d~sign plans called for tM initallation of ~t fencing it the ditch ovt~_ hi addilion, ~he co n.-'tm~on area w~l be seeded davy during the grading phase of construction We hope th/s informa~on will assist you in providing background informagon on the project to those concer~d. If you have any queslions plcas~ feel free to call us. EI~'D OF MEMORANDUM ,JAN 2 8 1997 TROPIC. aL 8qVIR C PAGE 01 Gary and Cathy Graves 5630 16th Avenue NW Naples, Florida 34119 RE: TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CO1WSULTANTS 2396 13tk [c~.~one & Fax (813) 263.0077 December 5, 1996 Preliminary Analysis/Evaluation of habitat alterations, those now occurring (the drainage easement) and those proposed (ag lands adjacent to the east, 'DeVosta" proposal) relative to wildlife usage. Dear Cathy and Gary, Per our discussions on the phone, our on site meeting with you November ;)6, 1996 and my review of relevant Tropical Envlronmental Consultants office file documents please find my environmental evaluation. i will first address the 30 foot wlde drainage easement (Right-of-way) recently cleared along your eastern property boundary. My review of the 1990 Collier County Soil Survey Indicates that hydric soils are present within a majority of the entire length of the drainage R. O. W. for at least two miles. As we discussed in the field this condition in and of itself does not mean that regulatory agencies would assert wetland jurisdiction. Two other characteristics must also occur, i. e., Wetland vegetation and sufficient hydroperiod before the three tests are met. I would, however, recommend you inquire at the county if a wetland determination was undertaken and what the agency (South Florida Water Management District-$FWMD and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers-USACOE) determined. What Is evident to me was the lack of installatto[ page 1 of 5 JAN ,~ 8 1997 TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL · CONSULTANTS 2396 J,lth Street, North Naples, Florida 33940 Phone & [:ax (8[3) 263-(X)77 containment fence, along the western edge of the R. O. W. This is required by the county itself for two reasons: 1) to prevent soil/silt/fines from entering wetlands and open water'such as canals, 2) to clearly delineate the limits of clearing and thus protect native vegetation outside of the county drainage easement from damage Installation of this device is a standard proceedure and considered a Best Uanagement Practice (BMP's) for land alterations during construction. Surprised the county does not follow its own requirements. Your observations that the Big Cypress Fox squirrel commonly forages and dwells in your yard and general vicinity was verified as we saw several behind your residence and up on the roof. Obviously necessary life history requirements of this species are being provided in Unit 97 and most shuridly along the entire ag land forested edge. A detailed survey must be conducted to evaluate where.dening/nesting sites exist as the Florida Game and Fish Commission legally can only protect the nest sites. This is required before land alterations can begin. Of special concern to me was did the county conduct such a survey before the clearing of the R. O. W, was begun? The stand of melaleUca trees present behind your office and residence would be prime habitat for squirrel nests. The Big Cypress Fox squirrel seems to prefer constructing nests within the dense canopy of melaleuca found within altered wetlands, Destruction of these without proper review and permitting by the FL. G. & F C would be a clear violation of Rorlda law. A portion of the cypress, melaleuc~ and slash pine stand clearly was present within the R, O. W. along your property. ! would recommend that you confer with county staff to determine if this survey was conducted and what were the findings. page 2 of JAN 2 8 1997 TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL 'CONSULTANTS lS~6 13th Str¢~, Nor~h N.rl~, Flo~da .t:1940 Phone &. Fax (813) Edges between differing landscape vegetational feature (ecotones) are ve~ rich and diverse when considering the variety and numbers of plant and animal species. This biodiversity is possible because the habitat provides essential needs of a variety of species such as the Big Cypress Fox squirrel and the Bob cat. Note, scat was noted within the cleared R. O. W. This edge, along the Estates lots from Vanderbilt Road to Immockalee, also provides a forested corridor which facilitates movement of wildlife over larger distances. Some comments relative to the proposed land alterations within the ag fields adjacent and to the east of you. My first concern, now that the 30' drainage R. O. W. has been cleared, is the potential loss of additional forested edge which presently exists on or along the ag perimeter spoil berm. Prior to the clearing of the R. O. W. the edge of the farm fields, just at the perimeter spoil mound, functioned as the ecotonal edge community. If the ag property also has a 30' drainage easement, one contiguous with your 30' easement, then it too might be cleared. The entire berm and associated ag cr~ch would be eliminated and in it place .would be a 60' drainage easement, completely devoid of mature native trees. This would further degrade the functional aspects of the occupied range .of the bob cat and the B. C. fox squirrel as well as other wildlife. One requirement of larger developments, such as the one being proposed by Mr. DeVosta, is that a perimeter berm 'be Installed to insure storm water runoff is held within the development. This new berm would be constructed interior to the 60' drainage R. O. W. further eliminating forested corridors for wildlife movement. page 3 of 5 AG£,i~~,~ No. JAN 2 8 1997 AGEND .~ TROPICAL ]~N~IRO~M~AL CONSULTANTS Naple~, Floti~ 3;1940 Phone & Fax (813) 26~077 County planning staff, as recently as two weeks ago, expressed concern by the new type of development being designed which offer little native vegetated buffers but instead consist of a repeating finger lake and fill complex, one which 'double loads" housing along access roads. Environmentally, functionally, these designs preserve little to rfo forested areas especially if slated for already cleared active ag areas such as that to the east of you. As you know the county Land Development Code Regulations require preservation of a percentage of native habitat when present. Development In previous active ag areas do not have to preserve native habitat if none existed. The Collier staff professional planners believe that these types of development designs could be more environmentally and esthetic, ally pleasing, if required to recreate masses of native vegetation, such as adequate and functional perimeter buffers. I concur with that evaluation. Specific efforts are being proposed through the'South Florida Water Management District's Environmental Advisory Committee to request tht the District evaluate the effectiveness of buffer requirements on water quality and wildlife values. The scientific literature clearly suggests that buffers of 100+ feet are necessary to preserve wildlife values and maintian biodiversity. No one in the field of ecology/wildlife management would disagree that the fragmentation of the landscape by agricultural practices and urban development is a threat to wildlife and biodiversity. They also agree that there are designs which if incorporated into both land uses would enhance the value to wildlife, especially if the more Intense landscape altering land use is adjacent to larger intact habitat systems,' L e., rural estates type rnoSalc where the majority of the native vegetation is retained. · page 4 of 5 AGENDA.ITEM JAN 2 8 1997 TEOPICAL ENVIRONM~ENTAL CONSULTANTS ~.39~ l~th St,~¢t. Nord~ Napl~, ~orida ~e & Fax (SD) There ~re B~t Management Pra~ices (BMP's) which, if applied to DeVost~ ~nd ~deton L~kes style design ~at, would enhance, augment, already existing habitat ~n~ions provided ~Iong the estates units-ag fields inte~ce. ~e creation of a forested burr along the edges, e~eclally ~en a more intense land ~e Is pro~sed on one ~rm fields multi~miJy units adjacent to the single ~mlly estates zoning, would a~ist both developments to bridge the ~ns~fion between them as well ~s provide corridor edge habitat for In con~uslon your statement that the creation of finger lakes would involve bl~sting to ~cture the subsu~ce rock and ~llt~te the excavation proc~s has the pDtentia~ to ~lter ground ~ter hydrol~y and recharge characteristics, especially in adjacent wetlands due to the potential of Ka~ conditions in southwest Flofi~. Fm~ures could near sur~ce mad/clay l~yers ~llowin9 summer rains to more ~uickly penetrate do~rd reducing the hydropefiod of affected wetlands. This ~nd fo~ation of sink holes were a serous problem when the Lee Coun~ Region~! (now InternatiOnal) airpo~ was constructed. My repo~ ~ general in co~mge, however ~dditlon~! field, investigation ~nd reMew of county records and pe~it ~pplications would alloW a more accurate e~uat~on of en~ronment~l issues raised. Thank you f~ alJowing Tropical EnMr0nment~l Consultan~ to ~sslst your info~tlon gathering process. If we ~n assist your effo~ ~her give a call. Biologist/Consultant copy: ·Commission Tim Constantine Collier County E A B Klm Dryden-F G & F Commission South Florid~ Water Management District-Fort Myers The Conservancy of SW Floflda - AG£ND/LIT£~_ JA~ 2 8 ~997 FLORIDA GA.M~ AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION MORRIS QL~TON t. HEDGEI~-rH. DDS MRS. GF~BERT W. HU.~HItEY THOMAS B. KIBLER JOE BRL.~R Sa4-asou .Miami Miccomkee Lakeland Desdn ALLAN L. EGBERT. ~D.. [.__~,¢ ~ VICTOR $. HELLER. ~a~.: F.---~w Ou~o~ Office of Environmental Services 29200 Tuckers Grade PunCa Corda, FL 33955 Oecenber ll. 1996 Ms. Cathy Graves 5630 16ch Avenue, Naples, FL 34119 BiG Cypress Fox Squirrel Habitat, Oakes Boulevard Area, Island Walk DRI Dear Ms. Graves: This is in response to your letter dated November 26 regarding potential impacts to the Big Cypress fox squirrel, a state-threatened species, and other non-listed wildlife, as a result of the development of the referenced Island Walk Development of Regional Impact (DRI). Your letter indicates that Collier County also cleared a drainage easement adjacent to your property, possibly in conjunction w£r_h r. he proposed development. You requested lr~ormatton as to whether the Gene and Fresh Water Fish Commission (CFC) vas contacted with regard to the clea~ing on the drainage easement, ~nich apparently was vegetated wi~h pine, Melaleuca, and brazilian.pepper. You also asked for information on habitat management practices for fox squirrels. I can confira that the are· in which you live does have a significant fox squirrel population. Fox squirrels in Collier County are dependent on slash pine, bald cypress, cabbage pal~ for forage and nesting (sometimes in bromeliada on the ~rees). However, Big Cypress £ox squirrels in Southwest Florida do use exotic vegetation, particularly Melaleuca, £or nesting. This is not to condone the preservation of Mel·leuca, ~nich has very detrimental impacts on fox squirrel habitat ·s · whole, but is & s:atenent of fact. We regularly coordinate with consultants, developers, and Collier Counry staff to assure ~hat forested areas, including Mel·leuc·-lnv·ded habitats, ere checked for the presence of active nests prior to cie·ring activities. In this case, we were hOC contacted regarding the easement habiEa~ cie·ting. As discussed with you, ye did not review the referenced DRI because of our .workload and the fact that the site vas primarily · cleared fan field. There is, of course, · big diffference in wildlife use between even an active ffa~m field and · d~velopment site. I concur vl~ you ~aC ~e developnen~ oE the sl~e h~ po~encial to ~ac~ fox squirrel populatio~ and ~a~ better planning of the site could benefit fox squirrels and other wlldliffe subdivision. I have the following recommenda'!¢----A~a:'-d i- 9' 1943- 1993 / JAN 2 8 1997 Ms'. Cathy Craves December ll, 199& Page 2 fox squirrels and development sites in Southwest Florida: l) Fox squirrels (bobcats, foxes, etc) ara particularly vulnerable to roadkill as they spend ~uch of ~heir time on the ground (ve~ different from gray squirrels). I have retrieved fox squirrel roadkllls from all over western Collier County. The proposed DRI plan you provided shove Logan Boulevard extension as being constructed adjacent to your proper~7, ltoving the roadway further to the east, away from the forested Estates, would reduce the potential for roadkill. Fox squirrels will cross large open areas in search of food resources and have large home ranges, so moving ~he road will not totally elf_~£nate roadkill, especially since this road ~y become a north/south corridor into Lee County (we have recommended ~he Logan Boulevard all~ru~ent over ~he S.R. 951 alignment because of l~pacts to regional wildlife resources). '" 2) Any existing native fox squirrel habitat (forest), particularly slash pine, cypress, and cabbage palm, should be preserved. Although we recommend the re.oval of exotics such as Melaleuca, no removal should occur before trees are checked (by a qualified biologist) for active fox squirrel nests. On most development sites, we recommend re-planting areas where exotics have been removed with native trees. 3) A habf~t buffer to intensive development, along with any reduction in residential d~nsity that would allow more habitat preservation/restoration, is beneficial to wildlife, including fox squirrels. Mixed-use development causes the disturbances to native wildlife, including problems associated with pets (predation, disturbance), light and noise (deters some habitat use by some species), nuisance animal co~plaints (animals such ~s bobcats or bats killed or removed because of real or perceived ~hreat), roadklll ('slow' speeds rarely eliminate the problem), herbicide/pesticide (lncludinj~osquito spraying) applic~tion (kills non-target species), and proliferation of 'common species' such ~s raccoons, pigeons, mockingbirds, and armadillos, rl~at compete with o~her more habitat sensitive wildlife species. The proliferation of common or nuisance animals on development sites can affect ~he qu~li~ of adjacent wildlife communities, including some of the bird species you mentioned in your letter. The buffer should be as big as possible (usually economics are ~.be determining factor). The proposed 20oft buffer you mentioned has very little value. Please call me at (9~1) 575-5765 if you have any questions. E~V 1-11-2 cc: Collier Co. Development Services Sincerely, Biological Scientist IV JAN 2 8 1997 BIG CYPILESS FOX SQUIRREL HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN PELICAN STRAND Prepared For Pelican Strand, Ltd. I0100 Valewood Drive Naples, FL 33999 Prepared By ylan nviro~a~l~~ Consultants)."fie. Wcttand & P~ldllfe Surve~nmtnml pe.r/nam~. 102.51 Metro Pathway. Suite 202. Foet Myer~ Florida. 33912 ~one: (9~I) ~18~671 F~: (9~1) ~I8~672 November 4, 1996 JAN 2 8 1997 e,. c:~T .. . ...... Approximately 12.96 acres of pine flatwoods will be crdated adjacent to the golf course in the northern of the site. The approximate locations of these areas are shown in the attached preservation plan. ,, construction is completed these areas will be re vegetateci with species native to pine flatwoods. The tree density will be based on 25 foot centers and the shrub plantings based on 20 foot cente~. The plantings will be clustered to mimic natural communities. The following is a list of potential species to be planted: Trees Pinus elliottii Quercus virginiana Sabal palmetto Strangler Fig Pemea spp. Mid story Ilex cassine Ilex glabra Myrica cerifera Serenoa repens Befaria racemosa Lyonia ferruginea The specific species planted will depend on the site conditions when the construction is completed and the market availability, of the various plant material. No exotic palms or trees will be substituted for native plants. The majority of the tree plantings, approximately 80 percent will consist of slash pine. Construction Details nrmediately prior to initiation of construction on any phase of development, the areas will be checked the presence of Big Cypress Fox Squirrel nests. If active nests are found, buffers will be maintained around the nest trees until the nests are deemed inactive. The buffers are anticipated to be around 100 fee: in width. Any deviations from this dimension will be presented to the FGFWFC for review and approval, prior to implementation. Before implementation of the restoration work, the limits of any native vegetation, especially mature slash pine, will be marked in the field and the areas barricaded to maintain this vegetation intact Most of the Big Cypress Fox Squirrel habitat will be placed under a Conservation Easement to Collier County or the SFWMD. A copy of this plan will be an attachment to the easement. The exceptions to this are the areas immediately adjacent to the golf course areas. These areas will be within designated common area and signage will be posted alerting pedestrians of the preservation status of these areas. All Big Cypress Fox Squirrel habitat will be subject to a long term maintenance pwgram. 7 AGEUO& ITEM_ dAN g 8 1997 P~..-~:~-~--- Existing Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Nest Adjoining Drainage Easement Improvements. AGEN I M - ,.I/~1,I ~, 8 1997 NO. Big Cypress Fox Squirrels That Currently Exist On My Adjoining Property. Improvements $1'AFF RECOIVlIviENDATiO'NS DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL !~ ~T ASSESSMENT FOR ISLANDWALK 05-9596-132 The 705 acre IslandWalk development is located in northwest Collier County (see location map). The pwperry is bound by the Dove Point Development on the north, largely vacant property on the east, the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension and the Golden Crate Estates area on the south, and the proposed Logan Boulevard Corridor (in part) and Golden Gate Estates on thc west. The southwesl coroer of the property adjoins a portion of The Vineyards Of Naples DRI. As proposed, the IslandWalk Development of Regional Impact will consist of2, 100 residential units (ofvarious types) located on approximately 363 acres, a "Town Center" area containing minor retail and service facilities (15 acres), a l?l-acre lake, 103 acres of open space and buffer areas, a 2-acre wetland conservation area, 33 acres of internal road right-of-ways, and an 18.acre right-of-way for proposed Logan Boulevard Extension. The project is planned for one, 6-year phase; beginning in 1997 and ending in 2002. RECOMMENDI~D ACTION: The staff of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council r~commend Conditiona~ A_L2pmval for the IslandWalk DP, I, to be further conditioned on a finding of Consistency with the Local Government Comprehensive Plan by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. NOVEMBER 1996 AGENDA ITEM JAN g 8 1997 Southwest F. iorida. Regional Planning CoJ~l~j~~ 4980 Bayhne Drive, N. Fort Myers, Fiori~ DEV_E..L_O_.p..MENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT ASS~§~'MEhT FOR ISLANDWALK 05-9596-132 NOVEMBER 1996 ~ AGE IT£ ~ ~~,~ I "°'~ i Southwest F. ior, da. Regional Planning Co.u~_c~~~.~ 4980Bayi'neDr've'N'F°rtMyers'Fl°r'~7. ~ SOUTHt~'T FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL MEM'BER$I-rfP CHAIRMAN .......... Commissioner Eugene Matthews VICE CHAIRMAN ..........Commissioner Sue Dudley SECRET~;;' ........ Commi,~mer-M.-Franklyn Jones TREASURER .......... Commissioner Kenneth 'Butch' Jones CHARLOTTE COUNTY Commissioner Sue Dudley Commissioner Adam Cummings Mayor Lindsay Harfington Mr. William K. Russell (vacancy) GLADES COUNTY Commissioner Kenneth S. Jones Commissioner Robert Giesler Councilman R. Gerry Harris Ms. Nancy Shore Commissioner John Manning Commissioner John Albion Councilman Tony Proctor Councilman Robert B. Davison Councilman Richard Bashaw Rev. Israel Su~rez Mr. Carl B. Snipes COLLIER COUNTY Commissioner Timothy J. Constantine Commissioner John C. Norris Councilman Fred L. Sullivan Mr. Richard L. Klm Mr. Robert L. Duane HENDRY COUNTY Commissioner Joseph R. Spratt, Jr. Commissioner Charles M. Martinez Commissioner M. Franklyn Jones Mr. Henry L. Bennett SARA$OTA COUNTy Commissioner Eugene Matthews Commissioner Jack O'Neil Commissioner Roy E. Hall, Sr. Mayor Merle L. Graser Mr. John C. Urban, Jr. Ms. Ruth Thomas EX.OFFICIO M1-'MBEI~I Mr. Chip Merfiam, SI=WMD Mr. Norm Feder, FDOT SOUTITWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIl. STAI~ WAYNE E. DALTRY .......... EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DAVID Y. BURR .......... PLANNING DIRECTOR DAVID E. BRUNER ........ LEGAL COUNSEL Glen H. Ahlcn Patti Armbmstcr Charles Barmby Bett~ Bm'sick Rick Carpenter Dorothy Cook Julia B. Davis John L. Gibbons Susan Gill Nichole L. Owtnnett Glenn E. Heath Deborah A. Holly Tiffany Lmterman William McGrath James E. Newton, Il Xiaodan *Dawn' Qiu I-2 Maureen Swenson Daniel L Trescott Charles Waddln~on, IH Timothy Walker Derek C.S. Wolfe D. Hunter Wynne AGENDA ITE~I~.. JAN 2 8 1997 \ AGEND~ PRIMARY STAFF FOR ISLANDWALK DRI REVIEW ...... .Eoordinator. Gle.nn_ ~.Heath .. Energy, Stormwater Management, Wastewater ManagemenffWater Supply, Consistency with the Local Comprehensive Plan, Consistency with the Regional Policy Plan, Consistency with the State Land Development Plan, Education, Recreation an&Open Space o Glenn E. Heath Police and Fire Protection, Solid/Hazardous/Medical Waste - .lohn L. Gibbons Transportation - Maureen E. Swenson Secretary - Patti L. Armbmster AGEI~DA ITEM-- JAN 2 8 1997 TABLE OF CONTENT~ Introduction Applicant Iaformation and Dotclopment Summary .. on Maps ................................... .. ..................................... iii Existing Land Use .................................................................. :... iv Mast~ Development Plan. R~gional Recommendations Local Recommendations Appendices: StaitRcports and Support Data Appendix I: Regional Issues Analysis B. C. Transportation .............................................. I-C-I D. Wastewater Management/Water Supply ........ ' ..................... E. Consistc'ncy with Local Comprehensive Plan .... i .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' ....................... ~E-I G. Consistency with the State Land D~v¢lopment Plan ...................................... I-Gq Apl:~mdix II: Local Issues A. Education .................................................... B. Solid/Hazardous/Medical Wast~ ................ ' ............... II-A-! · C. Recreation And Olx-n Space ....................... II-B-I D. Police And Fire Prote~on ........................................................ II-C-I Apl~ndix HI: Draft Dtwelopment Order Aplgndix IV: Substantial IX~iation Monitoring Form ....................................... 13/-i Appendix V: South Florida Waia- Managem~nl District Comments V~f~ JAN 1 8 1997 INTRODUCTION The "IslandWalk" DRI is located in northwestern Collier County, at the extreme north end of the Golden Gate Estates platted.ar~a...At buildout, the_p, rpp.os.ed deve~Iopment is to consist of 2,100 residential units (of various types) located on approximately 363 acres, a "Town Center" area containing minor retail and service facilities (I 5 acres), a 171-acre lake, 103 acres of open space and buffer areas, a 2-acre wetland conservation area, 33 acres of internal road right-of-ways, and an I g- acre right-of-way for the proposed Logan Boulevard Extension, for a total land area of 705 acres. The project is planned for one, six-year phase; beginning in 1997 and concluding in 2002. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Thc impact assessment for the "IslandWalk" DRI has been prepared by the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council as required by Chapter 380, .F_I~. The DRI assessment is largely based on information supplied in the Application for Development Approval (ADA). Additional information was obtained by consulting official plans, and by reviewing reports related to specific issues in the impact assessment. The ADA was reviewed by Collier County staffand their comments were integrated into various elements of the assessment. Water-related elements were reviewed by the South Florida Water Management District and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), and vegetation and wildlife issues were reviewed by the Florida game and Freshwater Fish Commission and FDEP. The Council's staff assessment is usually split into regional and local issues. The regional issues are ~hose that have the potential to affect more than one county (or that could affect a regional resource or facility). Recommendations regarding regional issues are formal conditions to be included by the local government in any Development Order which has jurisdiction over the DR/in question. In contrast, local issues are those that affect only the jurisdiction within a particular count),. .Accordingly, the Council staffs objective, with regard to these issues, is to highlight the crucial local ~ssues and suggest remedial action to be incorporated in the local Development Order, should the local govemment decide to approve the project. The local government may decide to include these suggestions as Development Order conditions for approval, or may opt to address the local issues through other means. The findings of this evaluation and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's recommendations are not intended to foreclose or abridge the legal responsibility of local government to act pursuant to applicable local laws and ordinances. Copies ofany "Development Order" (an order granting, denying, or granting with conditions an Application for Development Approval) issued with regard to the proposed development must be transmitted to the S ..~o~|~£~ · Florida Regional Planning Council and the Florida Department of Community Afl .irs. JAN g 8 1997 \ AGENDA. ITEM Project Name Date on which DRI/ADA was officially accepted Date on which DP.I/ADA was found ~fficient County DRI Hearing Date Date County Notified SWFRPC of Public Hearing Type of Development Location of Development DRI Threshold DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY Residential Units ....... Sunco ~uilding Corporation 3600 Vanderbilt Beach Extension Naples, FL 33999 (941)594-7400 Fax: (941) 594-7177 May 13, 1996 September 13, 1996 January 14, 1997 October 14, 1996 Residential, with ancillary retail Collier County 1,000 units Total Acres Estimated Average Potable Water Demand/ Wastewater Generation (gallons per day} Estimated Solid Waste Generation Project Construction Period ii Road 2,100 multi-family and single family units 705 Acres 577,500 glxl 15,400 Ib~/day 6 years to 2002 AGEMOA,ATEM. JAil 2 8 1997 AGENDA ITEM. I LEE COUNTY CR 858 ISLANDWALK SR 84 84 ISLANDWALK GENERAL LOCATION MAP EASTERN COLLIER COUNTY JAN 2 8 1997 .I t ill GuLF oF MEXICO 1991 1997 ,1 ! I STAFF RECOM iENDATiON$ SOUTHWEST I~I~ORIDA REGIONAl, PLANNING COUNCIL'S STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL THAT THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL, AS AM:ENDED BY.TIlE SIJFFICIENCY REPORT DATED AUGUST 1S, 199~;, BE APPROVED SUB,IEC~ TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. ~ (Refer to Appendix I, Section A) The proposed project w~l be ekcuica~y powered s.,xt w~ hcrcase the energy demands ofthe region. The applicant has committed, in the Application for Development Approval (ADA), to help reduce the energy impact of the project, through compliance with applicable standard regional energy conservation measures. Any DRI Development Order is,vaed by Collier County shall contain a provision that the appticant's commitments for energy conservation are adopted az conditions for approval of this project. (Refer to Appendix I, Section B) The proposed Master Surface Water Management System for IslandWalk will utilize the project's proposed lake system, as well az a preserved/enhanced wetland area, to provide quality and quantity storage volumes. Runoff'will be conveyed to the lake system through sheetflow, storm sewers ~nd swales. The Lol?,an Boulevard' Extension was assumed to provide for its own treatment requirements, independent of' the Master System for the development. Ofl~e nmoff'fi'om the north will be routed through and around the system to the Vanderbilt Beach Road and Logan Boulevard Canals. The entire Master Stormwater Management System for IslandWalk is designed based upon the 25 yearfJ day storm event. South Florida Water Management District staffhas identitled some minor concerns which will need to be addressed at the time ofDistrict permimn' g. These concerns, az well as standard Regional staffrecommendations, are addressed belowin the recommended development order conditions. If these conditions are included in the Collier County Development Order for the IslandWalk DP, I, no adverse regional water quality or quantity impacts should result from construction of the development. RECOMMENDATIONS Any DR/I:~,~Ol:n~nt Order i,~_~ed by Collier Oamty ~ contain th~ following 1997 a. The IslandWalk DRI shall require an Environmental Resource bo Co do conceptual approval and for consm~on and operation oftbe proposed surface water management system and for the proposed wetland enhancement and dredge and fill activities - fi.om the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), prior to ' commencement ~-con.muctlon ........... A determination shall be made, by SFWMD and the applicant, prior io the conunencement ofconstm~on, as to whether a District Waler Us~ Permit, or Permit Modification, will be required for ct. hain dewatering activities proposed for the construction of project lakes and/or road or building foundations. At the time of permit application, the applicant shall provide vegflcation that the proposed system d~gns-will meet District criteria in effect at that time. Best management practices shall be included on construction plans for development and should be submitted to the Collier County Water Management Division for review and approval. The South Florida Water Management District Staff Impact Assessment Report (contained in Appetx~ V ofthe Regional Assessment Report) contains five ($) items of concern to SFWMD staff regarding the proposed surface water management system. These items ere detailed on page 7, "Surface Water Management Footnotes", of the District staff report. These items of concern shall be addressed by the applicant, to the satisfaction of District staff, prior to the commencement of construction of the project. All internal stomrwater management lakes and ditches, and the preserved wetland area, shall be set aside as private drainage and/or conservation easements on the recorded final plat. Stormw ter lakes shall includea where practical, adequate nmntenance easements around the lakes, with access to a paved roadway. During construction activities, the applicant shall employ best management practices for erosion and sedimentation control. These practices shall be included with, or presented on, ail construction plans, and shall be subject to approval by the appropriate agencies prior to their implementation. Any construction sat baniers or hay bales, and any art. tot soil, as well as accumulated silt, shall be removed upon completion ofconstructlon. Either the applicant or the entities respongble for the specific construction activities requiring these measurc~ The final storrrrwater management plan shall consider, as applicabh ~ntro~ , m 1997 reduce runoff' rates and volumes, including but not limited to, fix structures, perforated pipes, and grass swale conveyances. when.ever pom'ble, rather than closed systems. 2 jo mo Any shoreline banks created gong the onsite stormwsler marutgement system shall include littoral zones constructed on slopes consistent with District and Collier County requirements and ~ be pla;ted in native emergent or submergent aquatic vegetation. Thezppttcant ~ enmre;~ ~upplemental replanting if necessary, that at least 8CP/~ covet by native squa~c vegetation is established within the littoraJ zone t'0r the duration ofthe project. MTI~e applicant _s~ conduct annt~ ~on$ of the l$1andWalk Master Stormwater znagement ~ystem and the preserved wetland e'ea on the project site so as to ensure that these areas are ~ in keeping with the ~ approved designs, and that the water management system is capable ofaccomp~ the level of stormwater storage and treatment for which it was intended. The applicant ~ confirm, to the satLC:action ofall applicable federal, state, and local review agendes, and the South Florida Water Mmagemem District, that the proposed stormwater n~ement system ~ not impact habitats of'any state or federally listed plant and/or animal species potentially occurring onsite, or that such impacts shall be mitigated to the benefit ofonsite populations of those species. The applicant, his successors or as~gns, shall undenalce a regularly scheduled vacuum sweeping of ail common streets and parking areas within the development. The applicant shall encourage any private parcel owners within the development to institute regularly scheduled vacuum sweeping of' their respective streets and/or parking areas. In areas adjacent to retail uses, the applicant, or the individual site developers, shall provide at least one inch of dry pre-treatment (retention or detention); or an equivalent alternative, as determined by the appropriate regulatory agencies; in order to provide reasonable assurance that hazardous materials will not enter Se stormwater management system. The applicant shall participate in any ongoing or fi:ture efforts by Collier County to establish a county-wide st0rmwater management system. Ditch and swale dopes ~ be designed to minimize discharges so that these facilities may provide some additional water quality treatment prior to discharge. Treatment swales shall be planted with grass. The grassed stormwmer treatment areas shah be mowed on a ~.~,,,lar besL ...~,0A, F~_~ x · e no~ la~ ~nt~ of~e d~opm~t, d~ ~ i ' ' ~ ~t my ~ate n proj~ 1~ ~tch~ or ~ or wMch ~y ~t~e ~ ~e no~ ~ 8 lg~7 ~~y.~non ~ on a re~ b~s. ~ ~o~on to b~ ~ ~ ~ 3 Underdrain systems and grease babies, ifutiliZed within the lslandWalk DRI, shall be inspected and cleaned and/or repaired on a regular basis. In no instance shall the period between such inspections exceed eighteen months. Stormwater management system maintenance requirements shall include removal of any mosquito-productive nuisance plant species (e.g., water lettuce, water hyacinth, catta~ and ~rimmse willows) from ail system nodes, reaches, and percolation basins, as well as fi.om the lake littorai zonec-employed in the system. To the extent consistent with ~tpplicable stormwater management 'system and environmental regulations, any isolated wading bird 'pools" constructed in lake littoral zones sha~ be excavated to a depth which provides ~ttati¢ habitat for mosquito larvae predators, such as ~ All commimm~ made by the applicant within the ADA, and subsequent sufficiency round information, rehted to Question 10 (General Project Description), Question 14 (Water), Question 15 (Soils), and Question 19 (Storrmvater Management), and not in conflict with the above recommendations, shall be incorporated in the Collier County Development Order as conditions for approval. 3. .~ (Refer to Appendix I, Section C) Trn~c generated by the IslandWalk DE1, when combined with other l~owth in the area, is anticipated to necessitate c~rently uncommitted improvements to portions ofVanderbllt Besch Road if adopted level ofservice standards are to be achieved and maintained through buildout in 2002. The buildout ofall area development as proposed over the life ofthe project is expected to overload the currently committed area roadway network, and improvements will need to be developed to ensure that the entire roadway network w/Il operate satisfactorily. Bas~ on the needs outlined in this document, any DRI Development Order isst~ed by Collier County shall contain the following provisions: ' bo 'The applicant or his successor or assigns shall be fully respons~le for site-related roadway and intersection improvements required within the IslandWalk DRI. The applicant shall be required to pay the full cost for any sitz-rehted intersection (including but not limited to signalization, turn lanes and additional through lanes) found to be necessary by Collier County for the proj Vanderbilt Beach Road and Lo~.n Boulevard. The site access and developed consistent with Collier County's ~ management rnit re i .-ments. Adequate commitments to provide the ner.,essary transportation including design and engineering 4 points ~. utility, relocation, r/ght-of-way ~.,qm construction, construction contract administration, and construction inspection necessary to maintain the adopted level of service for the following significantly impacted regional roadway through project bulldout in 2002: Vanderbilt Beach Road - Airport-Pulling Road to Oaks Boulevard. Adequate commitments to provide tr~e necessary improvements, including but not limited to, right-of-way, cost of signalization, turn lanes, and other improvements ' deemed necessary by Collier County to maintain the adopted level ofservice of the following significantly impacted intersections through project buildout: Vand~bilt Beach Road/Airpon-Pulling Road Vanderbilt Beach Road/Oaks Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road/Logan Boulevard Vanderbilt Beach Road/CR 951. Improvements to the facilities outlined in recommendatiom "b" and "c" above shall be made at the time that a road segment or intersecIion is expected to exceed the level of' service standard adopted in the local comprehensive plan. Service level determination shall be made by Collier County. To determine the existing levels of' service on regional facilities and the need for improvements in a timely manner, the applicant shall submit an annual monitoring report to Collier County, Florida Department of Transportation, Florida Department of' Community Affairs and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council for review and approval. The first monitoring report shall be submitted one year after the approval of the development order for the IslandWalk DRI. Repons shall be submitted annually thereafter until aler buiidout of.the project. At a minimum, the report shall contain p.m. peak hour trip generation estimates and turning movements at each of the access intersections and the off-site intersections listed above in recommendation "c", and a calculation ofthe existing level of'service at these intersections and on the road segments indicated above in recommendation "b". The levels of service shall be calculated according to current prof~onal standards. The report shall also provide a calculation ofthe existing level of service on the facilities and the estimated levels of service and project impact for the her year. The annual monitoring report shall also identify the status of the road improvements assumed to be committed in the ADA, and any deviations from the schedule identified in the ADA shall be addressed in the Notice of process per Chapter 380.06(19), l~ittta,q, laltg~. ~~? Based on th~ transportation assessment of.significant project imp of the following transportation improvements shall be needed prior to, with, development of.the IslandWalk DR/, if.adopted level of'service ~" to be' maintained through bulldout (2002) on regional roadwsy $ o Vandcrbik Beach Road - Airpon-Pt~Sttoad~o Oaks Boulevard- - Vanderbilt Beach Road/Airport.l~dl!,~g Road -Signal Retiming Vanderbilt Beach Road/Oaks Boulevird -Sisnallmion, if'warranted Vanderbflt Beach Road/logan Boulevard -Sisralimlon, irwdrranted Vanderbilt Beach Road/CR 951 -Sisnalimion, it warranted Development Order options may be considered by Collier County and the applicant to the extent that the options provide adequate commitments for improvements indicated above to significaatly impacted regional roadways and intersections. Whatever options sr~ exercised, however, should be done with the understanding that the following conditions shall be met: If'annual monitoring reports confrm that peak season, peak hour directional traffic on the regional road segments and imersections above exceed the level of service standards adopted by the County and the project is ut,'l;~ng more than $% of the adopted level of service capacity (significant impact), then ~unher building permits and certificates of occupancy shall not be granted until the standards of the County's concurrency management system have been met. The development order shall identi~ how the DRI wrll be treated in relation to the concurrency management system. The transportation impact 'to the roads and ~ersecIions above shall be appmpriatdy sddres,~d consistent with Southwest Florlda Regional Planning Cotmcll polldes, a~d the detmrlnagon ofproporg~ shar~ and/or plpelining of the regional road improvements shall b~ in scamiaac~ with S¢~'tion 163.3220, F.S. which ~ a Local Oov~raent IX'~opn~nt igr~ment and a commltm~tt by the applicant sad/or the local govcrament to ~ concurrency on all significan~ impacted regional maLt WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT/WATER Sm'Pt.y (Refer to Appendix L Section D) wTh~o ~.alk Dm will be provided with potable walet service by.th~ Comer Co~lnty ..p~I. RII>R,,p'.,E~ rks Division. The County has indicated that adequate capacity for the dev~o~'~// currently available through, water main and fire hydrant lead which eve~op~~ rrm along 8 1997 Beach Road. The proj~."ted potable waler demand, at buildout, for the d 577,500 ga/Ions per day, or 0.58 MGD. ~. I'~. ~ The project's'non-potable water 'demand will inig'"'"'"'"'"~y be met through use 6 from the Lower Tamiami Aquifer. This water may be stored in on.site holding ponds for irrigation use. Irrigation is the only antlclpsied non-potable use. Eventually, the applicant plans to utilize recycled effluent, from the Collier County Public Works Division, for non- potable purposes. The C.b,,-i~ris currently constructing a disirl'bu~on line along Vandetbilt Beach Road. The line may be available for the project to tap into by the time development commences in 1997. The South Florida Wsiet Management District has indicated that the project's groundwater usage may be restricted, si some future date, due to the potential for saltwater intmslon in the project area. District¥,~ffis also recommending that the project be required to pursue other sources ofinigagon water (rather than groundwater), including the proposed recycled effluent sotar~. The project's final non-potable water demand is expected to be approximately 1,600,000 gallons per day, or 1.6 MGD. WastewaIer treaiment for the project is also expeaed to be supplied by Collier County Public Works Division. County Public Works has indicated that it currently has adequate capacity to service the DILl, should no other demands cause the wastewsier plant serving the site to exceed ks design capacity. At buildout, the projected wastewater generation for lslandWalk will reach 577,500 gallons per day, or 0.$8 MGD. If the following recommendations are incorporated in development water conditions for the IslandWalk DRI, no adverse impacts to Water Supply or Wastewater Management should occur. RECOMMENDATION8 Any DRI Development Order [~_~_~ed by Coiner County shall contain the following provisions: This project shall require a modification to District Permit #11-00164-W, for the proposed groundwater withdrawals for landscape irrigation, to be approved prior to the commencement of project construction. Prior to commencement of construction, the spplica~ and South Florida Water Managem~ District shall determine whether the proposed construction activities will require a water use permit for certain dewatering activities proposed for the construction ofonsite lakes, and/or road or building foundations. Co At the time of application for the District Permit Modification, the applicant shall provide verification that the proposed plumbing and irrigation system designs meet District criteria in effect at that time. The project shall utilize ultra-low volume water use plumbing fixtures, self-closinl~ and/or metered water faucets, .an.d other water conserving devices andi consistent with the criteria outlined m the water ~on plan of the pul~li¢ Sul~l~iL'~ permit issued to Collier County Public Works Divis~on, or the appropl~telapprf~l~tt g 8 1997 utility provider, by the South Florida Water Management District. / The proposed irrigation withdrawals will result in an increase in use from the Lower Tamismi Aquifer beyond currently approved 7 proposed incresse ia ~,~ may increase the potential for saline intrusion end adverse impacu to cxL~tiag legal users in thc erca. Consequently, an impact enalysis shall be required for the I~landWelk Development ~t the time of permit modification application. 'Th~impe~-a~alysi~ shall~dude~an evaluation of the use of alternative sources, such es recle~ned water, ~rf'a~e water, or the water table aquifer. The project shall obtain potable v~ter, wastewater treatment ~cl, eventually non° potable water, fi.om the Collier County Public Wodc~ Oivision, if' Collier County Public Works determines that it hu su~cient capacity to serve the project. Should Collier County Public Works Division determine that it does not have sufficient capacity to serve the project, the applicant shall either construct interim potable water, westewater treatment and/or non-potable water facili~ or shall postpone development until such time es Collier County Public Works' service capacity is available to the project. Any interim facilities constructed by the applicant shall be constructed to Collier County Public Works Division Standards, and shall be dismamled, at the applicant's expertse, upon connection to the County facilities. Whether potable water, wastcvater tresm~ent and/or non-potable water facilities ere provided onsite or offsite' the applicant shall demonstrate to Coliier County that adequate capacity is available at the time of final plan submittal. As the IslandWalk DRI intends to utilize treated effluent for irrigation, the applicant shall ensure that on.site lakes, the preserved wetland, and the stormwater management system arc adequately buffered fi.om possa'blc cffiuent contamination. Tempomy septic systems may be ut' ;dized ia conjunction with construction and sales offices and model homes. Septic systems shall not be allowed onsite' other than for construction and sales offices and model homes. All temporary septic systems shall be properly abandoned and/or removed by a licensed septic system finn at the time when permanent or interim westewater treatment facilities come online. Ail construction plans, technical ~ifie~ons, and proposed plats, es applicable, for the proposed water dism'butiOn and wastewater collection systems, and any possible onsite treatment facilities, shall be reviewed and approved by the Collier County Public Works Division prior to commencement of construction. All potable water facilities, including any pom'ble onsite potable water treatment plant, shall be properly sized to supply average and peak day domestic demand, in addition to fire flow demand, at · rate approved by the Golden Crate lru'e C'e~-~! ~':~_ _£.. The lowest qua~z of water ·ratable and ac, oept~ble ~ be ~'~-d ~'or ~i~ 8 lC3~? potable water uses. :Potable water sha~ not be utilized for aon-potable ~ Ail co~ made by the applicant, within the ADA and sub ...... ~. (Water Supply), Question 17 (Water Supply), ~nd Question 18 (Wastewater Management), and not in conflict with the above recommendations shall be incorporated az conditions ofapprovai within the Collier County Development Order for IslandWalk. ................ CONSISTENCY WITH THE. LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (Refer to Appendix I, Section E) According to the applicant, development of the IslandWalk DRI will not require a local compr~ plan amexirn~. Collier County's adopted Future land Use Map designates the project areas as"Urban ~r:xed Use Resin. This land use category tllows residential developmem with a base density oft'our (4) units per acre, gong with ancillary development. Density increases and decreases may be glowed, based on a rating system contained in the Future Land Use Elemem. IslandWalk is proposed with a density ofthree (3) units per acre, which is within the limits set by the land use category. Thus the project appears to be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management (Comprehensive) Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS Any DRI Development Order issued by Collier County shall contain the following provision: ao Prior to any development order being ismed, Collier County shall determine if the proposed IslandWalk DRI is consistent with the local comprehensive plan, and whether the project's phasing and development schedule is consistent with the County's Concurrency Management Plan. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS In the "IslandWalk" ADA, numerous commitments were made by the applicant to mitigate project impacts. Many, but not all ofthese commitments are listed in this staff assessment. Additionally, the ADA provided a phasing schedule that provided the timing basis for this review. If this phasing schedule is significantly altered by the applicant, then many ofthe basic assumptions of this approval could be substantially changed, potentially raising additional regional issues and/or impacts. RECOMMENDATIONS Ail commitments and impact mitigating Letions provided by the applic~ Application for Development Approval (and supplementary documents', in conflict with specific conditions for project approval adopted as conditions for approval. 9 eo Tha q~pllca~ shall sub~ an sra~ report on the development ofresional impact to Collier C_xx~, tie Somhw~ l:lorida Resio~ PlannlnS Council, the Department of Community Atrairs and gl tffected permit agencies ss required in Subsection · ........... The d~..lopment phas~ schedule presented within the ADA and as adjusted to date of development order approval shall be incorporated its ~. condition of approval. Ii' development order conditions sad s~oplicant commitmenis incorporated within the development order, ADA or sufficiet~ round responses to mltigate regional impacts are not carried out ~ indicaIed to the extent or in accord with the timing schedules specitled within the development order and this phasing schedule, then figs shall be presumed to be a substantig dei~ion for the atTected regional issue. If the local government, durin8 the course of monltorln& the development, can demonstrate ~ substangg changes in the conditions undedyin8 the approval of the development order has occurred or that the development order was based on substar~,ny inaccuraIe ird'onnalon provided by the developer, resulting in additional substantial regional impacts, then a substantial deviation shall be deemed to have ocoirred. 'I~ monitoring checilis~ contained in Appendix IV shall be used as a guide by the local government in dctcrm]ning addition substantial regional impacts. Pursuant to Chapter 350.06(16), the applicant may be subject to credit for contributions, construction, expansion, ot acquisition of public facilities, ii' the developer is also subject by local ordinances to impact fees ot exactions to meet the same needs. The local government and the developer may enter into a capital contribution front-ending agreement to reimburse the developer for voluntary contributions in excess of the fair share. The local development order shall state the land uses s~roved in gross square feet, acreages and parking ('d' applicable) consistent with the statewlde guidelines and standards in Chapter 380.0651 Florida Statutes. 10 AG£1~ O~ ~I'~£1~. JAN 2 8 1997 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL'S STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMM}~NDATIONS IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SOUTItWF.,ST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL THAT THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL, AS AMENDED BY THE SUFFICIENCY REPORT DATED AUGUST 15, 1996, BE APPROVED SUBIE~ TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. ]~.!.~,~i_O_~ (Refer to Appendix 1~ Section A) The IslandWalk DRI could genera~ a total ofT0 elementary, middle school, high school md college students, by its projected completion in the year 2002. The spplicant has not proposed school site or facilities donation to tho School Board. Additionally, the County school system has not yet estimated the potential impact of'the project on its classrooms and facilities. However, the IdandWalk Development will be subject to school impact fees. The money generated from such foes could be utilized by Collier County Public Schools to offset any impacu ot'fl~e devdoprne~. Ifrevenuo ~ occur, duo to tho project's impacts, the applicant and Collier County Public Schools could negotiate to determino tho manner in which such shortfalls should be addressed. Any DRI Development Order issued by Collier County should include the following provision: Any financial impacts beyond normal school impact fees, which are generated by the IslandWalk Development, should be negotiated between the applicant and Collier County Public Schools, so as to offset any anticipated shortfalls. e SOLID/~RDOUS/I~DICAL WAST{~ (Refer to Appendix H, Seaion B) The applicant has indicated that waste materials generated by the proposed uses for the development does not meet the definitions of industrial, hazardo~ or special wastes. Moreover, tho applicant has included retail, services, md community activity wlid waste under the Domestic Solid Waste category. Further, the project is not expected to contain laboratories, storage rarities, or warehouse space where hazardous ~ generated or utilized other than those normally associated with medical offic use in the office district. 11 JAN 2 8 1997 RECOMMENDATIONS Any DRI Development Orck'rissued~ Collier Coun~ r~uld contain the following pmvlsions: ao Any business located within the IslandWalk Development, which generates hazardous waste, shall be responsible for the temporary storage, siting and proper disposal of the hazai'dous waste generated by such businesses. However, there shall be no siting of hazardous waste storage facilities contrary to Collier County Zoning Regulations. Buildings where hazardous materials or wastes are to be used, displayed, handled, genemed or stored shall be consiructed with impervious floors, with adequate floor drains leading to sepa~tte impervious holding facilities which are adequate to contain and safely facilitate cleanup ofany spill, leakage, or contaminated water. c. There sl~ll be no outside storage ofbio ]~Tardous or medical waste. do The applicant shall ensure that a contractor is available to provide maintenance of grease trap systems associated with restaurants and food establishments. eo Facilities qualifying under the Superfund Amendments Reauthorization Act (SARA) Title ITl of 1986, and the :Florida ~:~rdous Mater;als Emergency Response and Community Ri~t to Y,.now Act of 1988, shah 5Ie hazardous materials reporting applications in accordance with Sections 302, 303, 304, 311,312, or 313. Applications sh~l be updated annually by ench reporting facility. . The IslandWalk Community is not expected to have any uses which would generate hazardous waste and thus, no measures need to be taken to separate l~,~rdous waste from solid waste, no plan/fac~TMes are needed for handling, generation ~d/or emergencies other than those normally associated with the permitted uses in the Town Center district. Ifany such use does exist, it will abide by all applicable federal, state and local requirements. ho In the event that used motor oil is generated, it will be stored in federally approved containers, picked up, transported, and disposed ot hauling and disposal agents in agcordance with local, state, regulations requirements. Should I~?,,rdous waste or waste by-products be generated, tempontrily stored, l~ndled, transported, and disposed by licem accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. 12 and l~e~~./ dAN 2 8 1997 hcy win be AGEND& ~ (]~'fer to App~dix ]I, Sactlon C) The LslandWalk DM will be comprised ora residential communky constructed around a 171- acre hke system. Tbe c~ntrs~-~lan~ within ~lopment~will consist of~t Town Center, which will contain both recreational/open space amenities and minor ret~l development. These facilities will be solely for the enjoyment of residents and guests and will not be open to the general public. Each development area within the DE1 will be connected to the Town Center by · series ofbridges and walkway~ic~cle paths. These facilities appear to meet the local recreational needs for the project, tn addition, the community park and regional park impact fees estimated to be gener,_t_~ by the development appear to be in excess of those normally requb'ed by the County. Sta~recommends that the applicant's commkments, as stated in the Application for Development Approval, be included as conditions for approval within the Coiner County Development Order. RECOM'M'EN'DATION Any DEl Development Order issued by Collier County shall contain a provision that the applicant's commitments for Recreation and Open Space are adopted as conditions for approval ofthis project. J POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION (Refer to Appendix I~ Section 4) Collier County Sher~s Department will provide law enforcement to the project with a response time between seven and eight minmes. Fire of Hcials have estimated a response time of five minutes to the project. Collier County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) will provide fu'st response medical assistance to the project. EMS response time is estimated as six minutes. RECOMMENDATIONS Any DEl Development Order issued by Collier County should contain the following provisions: a. b To assure the project does not dilute the delivery of service fi.om a~acent County substations, the applicant should continue to meet with the sheriff's Depamnem to establ~ progranu and bx:oqx~e crime prevention measures during each phase ofthe site development process. protection dxxtkl be provided accord to existing standar The development oflshndWalk w~l imposed~ inclucling those for fire protection and energency medical se~~ upon current impact f__,e-_, sM appmximaI~ S~,000 w~l be collected in f~re protection impact fees; and spproximaIely $31,f00 will be collected in emergency medical service impsct fees. GENERAL CONSWERATIQNS Some of' the local issues discussed in the preceding sections are related to the time and funding of' facilities needed for the Isl~ndWalk DR/. There are three general recommendations that are applicable. RECOMMENDATIONS Any DR/ Development Order issued by Collier County should contsin the following provisions: The development should satisfy the requirements of any ordinance, which also required other developments not subject to Chapter 3g0.06, ~ procedures to pmic~te in ~ its proportions~ share nea~ to accomnm~e the impacts ofthe development; or Pursuant to ~ 380.06(163, the applicant may be subject to credit for contn'butions, construction, expansion or acquisition of public facilities, if the developer is also subject by local ordinances to impact fees or exactions to meet the same needs. The local government and the developer may enter into · capital contn'btrtion f'ont-ending a~reement to reimburse the developer for vohmtary contn'bufions in excess of his fair share. Co Ii'the applicant or Collier County has not or can not make adequate commltmenIs to provide the needed pub~ fadlifies to accon'anod~te the proposed development, then the project should be denied. 14 JAN 8 1997 DEVEI.,OP~I' ORD£R O~ ~E gO~ OF CO~ZSSZO~RS OF COOLER CO~, ~RZD~ FOR IS~K ~D IN S~ZO~S 33 ~ 34, TO. SHIP 48 $0~, ~GE 26 ~T, COLLIER ~, ~, Sunco Building Co.ora=ion, a Florida co~ora=ion, (herein 'S~CO') filed on Ap=il 1~, 199&, wi~h Collie= C~n~y an Applica=ion fo= Developmen= Approval (~A) of a ~vel~en= of Regional lmpac= (DRI) kno~ as Xslandwalk in accordance Subsection 380.0~(6), Florida Statutes; and ~, S~CO hal ob=aimed all necessa~ approvals Collier Coun=y agencies, depar~men=l, a~d ~ardl =e~i=ed condi=ion =o Pla~ed Uni= Deve!opmen= (P~) zoning and DRI approval; and ~RE~, ~he Board of Coun=y Co~issioners as =he gove~ing body of =he uninco~ora=ed area of Collier Coun=y having Jurisdic=ion pursuan= =o Sec=ion ~80.06, Florida S~a~u=es, au=horized and empowered =o consider Applica=ionl for Approval for Developmen=s of Regional l~ac=; ~KERE~, =he public noxice re~=ire~en=s of Chapter Florida S=a=u=es, amd =he Co~!ier Coup=7 Lam~ Developmen: Code (LDO) have been saxisfied; and ~E~, =he Collie= Cou~=y Planning Commission has reviewed and considered =he repot= and recommenda=ions of =he Sou=hwes= Florida Regional Pla~ing Council (~PC) and held a public e hearing on =he ~A on Dece~er 19, 1996; and ~6E~, =he Board of Coun=y Cc~issloners has passed Ordinance 96- on Janua~ 14, 1997, which rezoned =he proper=y =o P~; and ~, ~he issuance o~ a Develcpmen~ O~der pursuan~ Chap~e~ 380.06, Florida S~a~u~es, does no~ constitute a ~aiver any powers or rights regarding ~he issuance of o~he~ develcpmen~ pe~i~s no~ consis~en~ herewith by ~he County or S~a~e; and ~ER~, on Janua~ 14, 19~7, the Board of County Commissioners, a= an open public hea=ing in accordance wi~h Sec=ion JAN 2,81997 il 'J A1997 380.06,~, havin9 considered the application £or submitted by SUNCO; the report and reco~mendatione of the SWFRPC: the record of the documentary and oral evidence presented to the Collier County Planning Commissicn; the repot: and reco~endations of the Collier Codn=y Planning Co~ission~ the reco~endatfons of Collier County Staff and Advi~o~f Boards~ and =he record made said hearing, ~he Board of Co~ty Co~issioners o~ Collier County makes ~he following F~ndings of Fac= and Conclusions of Law: FI~INGS OF legally described as me= forth ~fl E~lbit "A". sufficiency response, hereby referred co as co~osi=e Exhibit which by reference =hereto is nade a par= hereof ~0 =he ex=eh= i= ~s no= inconsistent with =he =e~s and conditions of ~his Order. 4. The applicant propcs~s =he development of IslandWalk, a DRI cons!sting of approximately ~0~ ac~es, which includes: a To~ Center area containing re=ail and se~ce facilities of 10,000 s~are fee=, alcng with recr~=Iczal facilities on 15 acres; ~,100 residential dwelling units; a ~ a=re we=land conse~a=ion area; and 274 acres of open space and lakes; all of which are reflected on =he i11us:ra=ive Master Plan a:cached as Exhibit 5. The development is consis:en= with =he report and recommendations of the SWFR~C submi:=ed pursuant to Subsection 380.06{12}, Florida Statutes. 6. The development will no= interfere wi~h :he achievemen: of =he obJ~c=ives of the adopted S:a=e ~nd Development Plan applicable to =he area. 7. A co~prehensive review Of ~he impac: generated developmen: has been ccnducted by :he a~propriate depar:ments and agenclee and ~y the SWFR~C. 8. The developmen: is no: in an area desi~:ed ~ea 380.0S, ~1_~1.~, as amended. 9. The development Ls consistent with the current land development reTJletione and the Collier County Growth ~anagement Plan, as amended. 10. The development is consistent with the State Comprehensive Pl&n. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW NOW, THER£FOR£, BE IT P~SOhVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, in public meeting, duly constituted and assembled on this, the 14th day of Janus,7, 1997, that the ZslandW&lk ADA lubmitted b~ SUNCO is hereby ordered approved, aubJec: to the following conditions: 1. The IalandWalk DRI will incorpore:e the following energ~ conser~ation features: A. Provision of a bicycle/pedestrian system all land uses consistent with Collier County reTuirements. B. Provision of ~icycle racks or storage fa=ill:ica in re:rea:ions1, co~mercial, and ~ulti-family residem=ial areas. C. C:cpera:ion with the County in the locating of bus a:ope, shelters, and other passenger and system accommodations if and when a transit aye:em ia available to serve the project area. D. Use of energ~-efficien= fee:urea in window design. £. Use of operable windows and ceiling fans. F. Installs:ion cf energy-efficien= fee:utes in window design. G. Prohibition of deed restrictions or covenants wo. uld preven: or urmecessarily hamper conser~,&:Ion efforts. Reduced ccvera;e by as;halt, ccncre=e, rock, and sim£1ar s~,s:a~ces in streets, parking 1ocs, and o:her areas to red=ce local air temperatures and JAN 2 5 1997 reflected light and heat. ~ns:a~a~ion o~ energy-e~¢ien~ ~ighting s~reeca, par~i~g areas, recreation areas, a~ inferior and exterior public areas. Use o~ wa:er clcse~s with a maximum flush o! gallons and s~ower heads and ~aucets wi~h a f~ow rate o~ 3.0 gallons per minute (a~ 60 ~cunds o~ pressure ~er s~uare inch). Se~ecticn of native p~anta, ~reee, and o~her vegeca~ion a~d landscape design features reduce re~irements for water, fer~ilize~, mai~te~ance, L~d other needs. ~anting c~ ns:lye shade trees to ~rovide reasonable s~ade for al~ recrea:ion areas, s:reets, and par~ing ar~as. P~s=e~e=~ ~ :=ees to provide needed shade wa:~er ~o~:hs while not overly reduci=~ ~he benefits of s-~nl£gh= in the cooler months. N. Planting of n&:ive shade trees for each res!~en=ial unit. O. Or~en=atlc~ ~ s~ructures, as possible, ~c reduce solar hear g~£z bY walls and =c utilize the ~a=ural cooling effe::s of the wind. P. Provision lc= s:ruc=ural shading wherever pr&c=lcal when natural shading cannot be used effectively. Inclus£cn cf porch/pa=lo areas in residential units. R. Considera=ic~ by the project architectural review cocci=tee(s) of energ~ conservation measures (both =hose noted he=e and others) to assist bu£1ders and residents in their efforts to achieve greater energy efficiency in the development. A. The IslandWa!k DRI shall re,ire an Environmental Resource Pe~!t (£R?) - for ccnceptt -4- AGE~IOA. ITEM NO, ~ dA/ ,?, $1997 al approval and Do Fo for construction and opera=ica of =he proposed surface water ~anagemenC system and for =he proposed wetland e~hancemenc and dredge and ac=ivities - from =he Sou=h Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), prior to commencement of construction. A decerminacicn ihall be ~ade, by SFWMD and the applic&nc, prior Co the commencement of conics==ion, as Co wheChe= a Dis=rice Wace= Use Peri=, or Pe~.~c ~odificacion, will be for c~=cain dewace=ing accivicies proposed for =he cons:~ccion cf project lakes and/or road building A: =he cite o~ peri= applica=ion, =he applicant shall provide verification chac =he proposed designs will =eec Dis==icc criteria in effe=c chac Best ~anagen~C praccices shall be ~ncluded co~s:ruc:icm ~la~s for develo~nenc and shall be sub~i~ed ~: ~he Coll!e~ Coun~ Develo~men: and Environnem=al Services The S~ S=aff Impac= Assessmen= Repor~ iden=ified five (S) i=ems of conce~ =o S~ s=aff regarding =he proposed surface wa=er ~nagemen= These i=ems are de=ailed on page ~, 'Surface Wa=er here=o. These i=ems of conce~ shall be addressed by =he applican=, ~o =he sa~lsfac=ion of =he prior =o =he commencemen= of cons=~c=ion of proJec=. All in=ernal s=o~wa=er mana;emen= lakes and conveyance di=ches, and =he prese~ed we=land area, shall be se= aside as priva=e drainage and/or JAN 2 8 1997 ,J 4 1997 Co Do Fo for construction and operation of the proposed surface water management system and for the ~rcpose~ wetland enhancement a~d dredge and fill activities - from the South Florida Water Management District (SF~D), prior Co co,~encement of construction. A decez~inacion shall be made, by SFWMD and applic~nc, prior co the commencement of consc~ccion, as co whether a District Water Use consC~cC~on of project lakes and/or road or building foundacions. shall provide verification ~ha= =he proposed designs will meet Dis=r~cc criteria ~ effect chi: time. Best manage=%~c prat=itel I~all be ~nclu~e~ on co~structic~ ~:a~s for development and shall submitted Cc the Collier County Develo~mem: a~ EnvironmemCal Service~ Ad~inistrato= for review and a~roval. The S~ Staff I~acC Assessment Report iden:~f~ed five (S) icens of conce~ co S~ staff regarding C~e proposed surface water ~nagemenc system. These ~Cems are de:ailed off page ?, 'Surface Water Management FcoCnoces', of the D~scr~cC staff report, chac page being attached as Exhibit hereto. These items of conce~ shall be addressed by the applicant, Co the satisfaction of the S~, prior ~o the co~encemenc of consc~cc~on of the pro~ecc. ~1 ince~al sco~wa:er management lakes and conveyance ditches, and the prese~ed wetland shall ~ se: ~ll~e as ~rivaCe drainage ~nd/or ' Ko conservat£on easements on the recorded final plat. S~or~ater ls~es shall ~nclude, where practical, adequate ma!=:enance easements around the lakes, with access to a paved roadway. During conair=trion activities, the applicant shall employ beat =anagement practices for erosion and sediments=ion con=to1. These practices shall be included in. or presented on, all conatrucclon plans, and shall be sub,et= co approval by the appropriace agencies prior to their implementation. Any consCrucC~on silt barriers or hay bales, and any anchor so!!, as well as accu~ulaced silto shall be removed upon compleCion of cons=~cCion. che applican~ or che encic~es responsible fo= che specific co~s:~c~ion activit~es re~r~ng these the~ re~ove~ =~on co~plet~on of The final s:o~water management plan shall consider, as a~91icable, measures =o reduce runoff fa:es a~d vclunes, including, ~u= grass swale ::~veya~ces. Swai~s shall b~ used, whenever posslble, rs=her =hah closed systems. Ten pa=cent (LO%) of ~he finished lake banks shall be plan=ed as l~==oral zones with native emergent or sub~ergen: a~a=ic vege=a=~cn, consis~en: with LDO re~ire~e~:s. The applicant shall ensure, by supplemental =~plan~ing if necessa~, a= leas= 80% coverage of ~he plan=ed littoral shelf maintained ova: a three (3) year per~od. Beyond ~hree ~ears, =he l~==oral shelf shall be maintained as a functional component of ~he lake system. The applican: shall conduct ac%ual inspections ~he IslandWal~ Mas=er S=o~wa=e= Management System and =he presaged we=land area on " AGENDAIT~.~ JAN 2 8 1997 'J A 1997 P~.~ keeping with the fine1 approved desi~s, and that the water ~anage~ent syste~ ia capable accomplishing the level of stor~water storage and ~rea~ent for which it was intended. L. The applicant, his successors or assigns, shall undertake a repularly scheduled va~m sweeping of all co.man streets and par~ng areas within the private parcel owners ~ ain the development to institute regularly scheduled vacuum sweeping ~heir ~espec~ve s~ree~s and/or parking a~eas. ~. The app~ican~ shall par~icipa~e in any ongoing future efforts b~ Collier County ~o es~ab~ish coun~-wide s:c~a~er ma~agemen~ ~. D~c~ and s~a~e s~cpes sha~ be designed · ~im~ze d~sc~arges so ~ha~ ~hese faci~i~ies provide some addi~fona~ wa~er ~a~i~ ~rea:men~ p:ior ~o d~sc~ar~e. Tree,men: swa~es s~a~l be p~a~ed wi~h O. T~e grassed s:o~wo~er ~rea~me~: areas s~a~l be ~:~ed on a re~;Za~ basis as par~ of ~e no,aZ ~a~ main~enance of ~e development. ~y debris may accumulate ~n pro~ec~ ~akes, ditches or o~ which may ~n~e~fere wi~h ~he no~a~ flow wa~er ~hroug~ disc~arge s~c~u~es and underdrain s~s=ems, shall be cleaned from ~he de~e~/Fe~e~ a~eas ~n a Fe~aF ~as~s. P. Underdra~n systems a~d grease baffles, ~f u~l~zed within =he IslandWalk DRI, shall ~ inspected and cleaned and/or repaired on a re~lar bas~s. In no instance s~all =he period be=ween such ~nspe:=~ons exceed eighteen ~cn=hs. Q. S=ormwa=er system maintena~ce recl~irements shall includs removal of any mos~ito- productive nuisancs plant species (e.g., water lettuce, w&:er hyacinth, cattails and primrose willows} from all system nodes, reaches, and percolation basins, as well as from the lake littoral zones employed in the system. R. To the extent consistent with applicable management system and environmental re~ulations, any isolated wadin~ bird 'pools' constructed in lake littoral zones shall be excavated to · depth which provides aqua~ic habi~a~ for mosquito larvae predators, such as ~ambusia a~inis. S. Ail commi~men~s made by ~he applicant within the ~D~. and s~se~en~ su~ficien~ round info~a~ion, rela~ed ~o 0ues~ion ~0 {General Description), ~uesxion 14 (~a=er), 0ues~i=n (Soils), and ~es~icn 19 {S~o~a~er ~anage~en~}, no~ in ccnflic= wi~h ~he above s~ipula~ions, are hereby inc==;cra~ed in ~his ~evelcp=en~ Crier reference. ~. The applican~ c= his successor cr assigns shall be fully responsible fo~ si~e-rela~ed roadwa7 and in~ersec~ion improvements re.ired within ~he XslandWalk DRX. The applican~ shall be re~i~ed pa~ i~s prc;or=icna~e share of ~he cos~ for intersection improvements {including bu~ no~ limited ~o si~naliza~ion, ~urn lanes and additional ~hrough lanes) found ~o be necessa~ by Collier County for ~he project's access in~ersec~ions onto Vanderbil~ Beach Road and ~an Boulevard. The si~e access ~oin~s shall be located and developed consis=en~ wi=h Collier County's access mana~e~en~ s~andards and pe~ic retirements. B. The following roadways and intersections are AGE DA ~rM . XslandWalk DR! (S% of ~he adop:ed leve! of se.vice capacity o! ~he roadway} and are ~orecas:ed to fall below ~he adopted level o! se.vice standard prior ~o Project (i} Roadways Vanderbilt Beach Road -Airport-Pulling Road to Oaks Boulevard -Vanderbilt Beach Road/Airport-Pulling Road -Vanderbll~ Beach Road/Oaks Boulevard -Vanderbilt Beach Road/;,o~an Boulevard oVanderbilt Beach Road/C~ Adequate commitments to provide the necessary improvements, including but no~ limited ~o0 right- of-way, cos~ of si~nalixa~io~, turn lanes, and o~her improvemen:s deemed necessary by Collier County to maintain the adopted level of service the slgnlfican~ly impa~e~ roadways and intersections specified in Conditio~ ~.B. hereof shall be ma~e ~7 Collier Court:? or applican~ as specified herein. Xmprovements to the facilities outlined in Condi~ion 'B' above shall be made a~ the ~ime that a road se~men~ or intersection ia expected exceed the level of service s~a~dard adopted in the local comprehensive plan. Service level determinatio~ shall be made by Collier ¢ouflt~. To determine the existing levels of service regional facilities and the need for improvements in a timely manner, ~he applican~ shall su~mi~ a~ annual ~raffic monitoring report to Collier County, Florida Depar~men~ of Transportation Florida Department of Community Affaire ~DCA~o and the SWFRPC w and a royal. The first A~£8~A.~£M -__ .s 0.jAN 2 8 1997 4 1997 monicoring repor~ shall ba submitted one year afcer the approval of the Development Order for the Island~alk D£I. £epor~s shall be submitted a~uslly thereafter until buildouC of che The annual craffic moni~oring reporc shall (a= a minimum) contain cbs following information. (i) PM peak hour turning movement counts ac all sire access points on=o Vanderbil= Beach Road and ~ogan Boulevard and the off-sics in=erseccions iden=ified in Condi~ion 3.B. above. (ii} ~sC$~a:ed ex~s:~g ~e~e~J o~ le~ce intersections and on Che ~oad le~enc identified in Condition 3.B. a~ve. {iii) Es:i~aced future levels of le~ice ac che in:ersec:ions and on the road idenxified in Condicion 3.B. a~ve, baaed on a c~e year prcJec:ion of fu:ure volumes. (iv} ~ es:i~a:e c~ the PrcJe::'l exisci~g genera:ion. The ~nual C~da:e and Inve~::~/ Repor~ (ATiR} referen:ed In Co,dS:ion 3.~. sba11 lubscicuCe for ~he es=ima=e o~ exis=ing levels o~ ee~ice on moni=o=e~ roadwa~ se~en=. In =he even= =ha= no reeiden=ial dwelling uni=s are occupied wi=bin =he DRI, a le==er documen=ing developmen~ sca=us on-sire may be considered an acceptable replacemen= =o che above =raffic moni=oring for =ha= year. The above =raffic moniCo=lng repc==, in co~ina~ion wi=h =he ~nual ~da=e and Inven=o~ Repot= referenced in Condi~ion 3.H. hereof, =ep=esen=e =he a~ual =raffic mcni=oring re~iremen=s for IelandWalk. ~ased on the cranspor=a=ion assessmen= of JAN g 8 1997 .,. bL si~nificanc pro,eot impacts, conBtruction of the following transportBtion improvements or acceptable alternativeB Bhall be needed coincident with development of the IslandWalk DRI. if &dopted level of Bervice conditions are to be maintained througB buildout (2002) on siqni£1can:ly impacted regional roadway se~en~ and intersectionB. vandefbil~ ~each Road -A~rpor~-~ll~g Road to Oaks B~lsvard Vaflder~il~ Beach Road/Airpc~*Pulliflg Icad Va~erb~l~ beach hd/Oak~ vande~hil~ leach Road/~a~ The applicant shall mitigate i:s impacts on the regional and local roadway and intersections identified herein as follows: {i) The A~licant shall make or pay for the Bite reis:ed i~provementf speciiied in 3.A. hereof. share of intersec~ion i.r~rovementa at its a::~ss points to public roalways spec!fie! in 3.A. h~reo!. (iii) The Applicant shall be BubJect to all lawlully adopted transports:ion impact fees. (iv) The A~plicant shall be sub, eot to the Concurrency~anagement System o~ the County as se: for:h herein. The re;i:nal ro&d~ay se~ents and intersections on ~hich this pro, eot has significant impacts are ~holly v£~hin the Jurisdiction of Collier County for pu.~oses of concurrency management. The has made ~he decision co plan for and manage the impacts al this DRi ~hrou~h i~s duly adap:ed co~rehensive plan. The County has considered the re,lanai roadway semen, s and regional roadway Ho and has dstermined to require the pro~ect to be subject to and to co~ply with the Concurrency Management Sys~e~ (CMS) of Collier County as adopted in its Growth Management Plan and implemented by the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APF) Ordinance No. 93-82, as amended, which is incorporated by reference aa Exhibit After due consideration o~ the alternatives, the County has determined that to require compliance with concurrency as ~andated by the CMS, in addition to the other ~t~gatiofls re.ired ~n 3.F. hereo~, ~s the appropriate way to acco~odate the t=anspor~ation facilities ar~ provided concurrently with the transportation ~mpacts of th~s project. The Ade~a=e Public Facilities Ordinance reTuires the Growth Management Director =o co. lets an ~nmual U~da=e amd Inven=o~ Report (AUIR) AuTos: 1st of each year on roads and public facilities ~ased on the adopted level of ~e~ice. The a~pllcam= shall ~rovi~e within fifteem (1~) days of puMl!ca=Icn each year a copy of said A~iR on =he regional facilities se= forth in 3.B. =o S~PC and =he D~. The Board o~ County Co~issioners is re.ired by =he APF =o es=ablish~eas of Significant Xnfluence (~I) around any roa~ se~en= or intersection which is opera=lng a= an unacceptable level of (~S) or is projected =o operate a= an unacceptable ~S and is no= scheduled for i~rovemen= in ~he Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Co=prehensive Plan in a ~anner and time which would provide facilities concurrent with ~he impacts of development pursuant =o =he APF. Projects within =he bounda=ies of an ~I are, with few exceptions JAN 2, 8 1997 not relevan~ herein, prohibited from obtaining further Cer~£fica:es of Public Fecili:y Adeqvacy that would allow impacts to exceed the remaining additional impacts to the deficient or potentially deficient facility. The applicant shall notify SWTRPC and DCA within five iS) working dsys after receipt of notice of a p~blic hearing to the boundaries of ~ny ~l on ~ny f~cili~ies in S~c:ion 2.B. h~reof. ~i any of the road semen, s or in~ereec~ions ~den~f~ed ~n paragraph 3.B. become deficient, the County shall establish an ~ea of S~f~canC Influence around such ee~en~ pureuan~ ~o criteria se= for=h in =he A~. In add!rich =o =he provisions of =he Collier APF Ordinance: (1) The IslandWalk DRI is sub]ec= =o =he specified =e~i=emen=s of =he Ade~a=e Public Facili=ies O=~!nance No. 93-S2, as =ha= Ordinance exis=ed cn =he effe::ive dare hereof. ~ anend~en= =c =he =ranspor=a=ion pot=ions of =ha= Ordinance by Collier Coun=y shall no= effec=ive or applied ~o =he D~I unless and un=il =his Developmen= Order is amended =o in=o~cra=e and render applicable such changes or amendmen=s ~o =he APF Ordinance. (ii) In =he even= char Collie= Coun=y desi~a=es an ~X around a deficien= road se~en= =ha= predic=ed =o be subs=an=ially i~ac=ed b~ IslandWalk, and =he ~l does no= include ~his DRY, =hen =he applican= shall ~ re~ired =o file a No=ice of Change of =his Developmen= Order wi=h Collier Court=y, =he--PC, and =he D~, ~ursuan= =o Subsec=ion JAN g 8 1997 ~o~t~a ~tatutem. The applica~t s~a~ file a ~ocice of r~ange within sixty (~0) days from the date the County creates an ASZ for such a deficient road aeg~ent that excludes the DRI. The applicant aha11 file with the No=ice of Change, a current traffic analysis and other information attempting to establish that the DRI ia not having a substantial impact upon the pertinent road segment, or other Justification of the County's exclusion of the DR! from the ASI. If an AS! ~a established for any deficient road segment or intersection lis=ed in Paragraph 3.9. of this Development Order than does not include the lelandwalk DRI, the DRI shall not apply for or be issued any further Certificates of Public Facility Adequacy un=il= (1) the Notice of Change decision ia~ade by Collier County, if neither DCA nor SW?~PC participates in the public hearing on this Notice of Change pursuan= to Subsection and the change is adopted by Collier County, as proposed; or (2) if aw ri=ten objection was filed by either DCA or SWFRPC, until the deadline for any appeal of the Collier County decision has expired pursuant ~o Sec=ion 380.07, Florida Statutes, and no appeal has been filed. {iv) For purposes of =his Development Order, the DRI aha11 be deemed to have a significant impact upon a deficient road segment if its traffic impacts exceed five percent (5%) of =he peak hour, peak season adopted level of service capacity of the roadway. AGEND~JT£M JAN 2 8 1997 ..... er) The County shall provide the requisite public notice and hold a public hearing on the Notice of Change as expeditiously as possible. Following a public hearing, Collier County shall amend the DRI Development Order record its determination whether or not the DR! is having a subs=an=iai i~pact upon the deficient road segment or o=herwiae should not be included within an ASI for the deficient road segment. In making =his determina=ion, the County shall include =he impacts resulting from all development to occur pursuant =o the Certifica:ea o! Public Facility Adequacy previously issued to the DRI. The amendment to this Development Order is appealable pursuant to Subsection 380,06(19) and Sec=ion 380.07, £1orida Statutes. (vi) If neither DCA nor S~,'FRPC objects in wri=Ing =o the No=ice of Change pursuan= ~o Subsec=Icn ~S~.O6(l~)(f;, Florida Statutes, and the change is adopted by C~11ier County aa proposed, :he DRI may be issued Certifica:es of Public Facility Adequac~ following =he County's Development Order decision. If either DCA or SWFRPC submits a written objection to :he No:ice of Proposed Change prior to the public hearing, =he shall no: apply for or be issued Certificates of Public Facility Adequacy until =he deadline for any appeal of =he Collier County decision has axe. ired pursuant to Section 380.07, Florida S=atutes. and no appeal has been filed. Collier County and the applicant may consider other options :o p 'pvSde, adequate commitments for needed AGEND. A I, EM _ JAN281997,,. 7/, ,, ;97 i~rovements to transportation facilities set forth in 3.B. hereof provided that said options ~eet the following criteria: ¢i) The transportation impacts to the roads intersections outlined herein shall be addressed consistent withSWl~PC policies said options or mitigative measures shall be adopted in accordance with Sections 153.3220, Florida Sta~u~es, which requires a Local Government Development Agreement and a commitment b~ the applicant ·nd/or the local government to insure concurrency on all significantly impacted regional roads. (ii) Any s~ch option shall only be implemented after a ~otice of Proposed Chan~e procedure outlined above. 4. W~STEWAT£R MANAG£..~E-_NT/WAT~ SUPPLY A. This project shall require a modification District Permit #11-00164-W, for the proposed groundwater withdrawals for landscape to be approved prior to the commencenent cf groundwater withdrawals. B. Prior to commencement of construction, the applicant and SF~D shall deter~ine whether the proposed construction activities will require · ~ater ~se per-it for certain de~atering proposed for the conatr~ction of onsite lakes, and/or road or building fo~ndatione. ¢. The pro~ect shall utilize ultra-lov volu~e wa~er use plu~ing f~xtures, self-closing and/or metered water faucets, ·nd other water conserving devices and methods, cona£stent with the criteria outlined in the rater conservation plan of the public supply permit Lss~ed to Collier County Public #orks Division, or the appropriate · 1 GENDA EM - JAN 2 8 1997 pa. _ "'/,,,z.. _ ~proved utility _ AG£ D rfE - ~ .. 7.._ provider, by the SD~D. Should proposed irrigation withdrawals result in an increase in use of groundwater from the Lower Tamiami Aquifer beyond cuzTently approved agricultural uses, an impact analysis shall be required for the IslandWalk Development at the time of permit modification application. The impact analysis shall include an evaluation of the use of alternative sources, such as reclaimed water, surface water, or the water table aquifer. The pro, eot shall obtain potable water, waatevater treatment and, eventually non-potable water, from the Collier County Public Works Division, if Collier County Public Works determines that it baa sufficient capacity to serve the project. Skould Collier County Public Works Division determine that it does not have sufficient capacity to serve the project, the applicant shall either construct interim pot&ble water, wastewater treatment a~d/or non-po:able water facilities, or shall pcsupone development u~til such ti~e as Collier ¢~unty Public Wsrks' se.-wice capacity is available to the project. Any interim facilities constructed bythe applican: shall be constructed to Collier County Public Works Division Standards, and shall be dls~antled0 at the applicant's expense, upon connection to the County fecilitiea. ~m..ether potable water, wastewater treatment and/or non- potable w~ter f&cilities are provided oneite or offsite, the applicant shall demonstrate to Collier County that adec~uate capacity is available &: the time of final plan submittal. As ~he Zsland~alk D~Z intends co utilize treated effluent for irrigation, the applicant shall ensure that onsite lakes, the preserved JAN 8 1997 Go Jo K0 pursuant to applicable FD£P cr~ter£a. Te..~porar~ septic systems may be utilized in conjunction with cons=ryerSon and sales offices and p~ope~ly abandoned and/or removed by a licensed septic system ~ aC the C~me vhefl pe~anent iflte~m wastevace~ c~eatment facilities and p~oposed p~s, ~s applicable, fo~ ~he p~oposed va~e~ d~s~r~b~oa ~nd vas~e~a~e~ collection systems, and a~7 possible ons~e t~eac~en~ fac~es, sha~ be reviewed a=d approved by Co~er County P~b~c Works C~v~s~on p~c~ commencement cf consc~cC~on. A~ p:cab~e wa:e: facilities, ~ncl~d~ng any possible ons~ce potable wa=er CreaCmen~ s~a~ be p=cpe=~y s~zed ~o sup~ average a=d peak day d==es=~c de=~=d, ~n add~:~:n co f~r~ demand, as a ra:e a;proved by C~ Oo~den Oa:~ Control and Rescue T~e lowest ~a~cy of wats: available and acceptable shall be u~l~2ed for al~ non-potable wa~er ~ses. AI~ commitments made by ~he applicant, w~Ch~n ~A and subse~enc suff~c~en~ round ~nfo~ac~ofl, re~aced co 0uesc~on 10 (~enera~ Pro~ec~ Description}, 0ues~on 14 (WaCe~ Sopp~y), ~es~on ~ (Ns=er Supply}, and 0~esC~cn ~8 (~asce~ace~ ~na~emen~), and no~ ~n con~c= w~h ~he above reco~endac~ons sha~ be ~nco~oraced as conditions of approval w~ch~n the Collie~ County Development Order for IslandWalk. JAN g 8 1997 A. Collier County has de=ermined that the IslandWalk project il consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and that the project's one phase development ia consistent wf:h the County's concurrency management plans relative to public facilities necessar~ to support the project. 6. ~£NEP~ CONSID£PATIONS A. All commitmen~s and impact mitigating actions provided by the applicant within the ADA {and supplementar~ documents) that ara not in conflict with specific conditions for project approval outlined above are officiall7 adopted as conditions for approval. B. Pursuant to Subsection 38~.06(16), Florida ~=a=utes, the applicant shall receive credit for contributions, consCguction, expansion, or acquisition of public facilities if the developer ia also subject by local ordinances to impact fees or exactions ~o meet the same needs. The ~cca! governmen~ and the develc~e~ may enter in~o a capital con~ribu~ion fron~-en~in~ agree~en~ to reimburse the developer for volun~arycontribu~ions in excess of the fair share, C. The developmen~ phasing schedule presented within the AD~ and as adjusted ~o da:e of deve!cp~e~t order approval shall be inco?poraced as a condition of approval. Xf developmen~ order conditions and applican~ co~icmenc~ inco~ora~ed within ~he DevelopmenC Order, ~A or sufficien~ round responses ~o miciga=e regional impaccs are no= carried ouc as indicaced ~o the extent or in accord wich che ciming schedules specified wichin che DevelopmenC Order and this phasing schedule, ~hen this shall ~- presvmed co be subsCancial deviacion . AGE~DA~EM . JAN 2 8 1997 for the affected regional issue in accordance with Subparagraph 380.0~{19){c), Floc{da S~a~u~es. If the loc&l government° during the course of mon£tor£ng the development, ca= demonstrate tha~ substantial chan~s in the co~ditions underlying the approval of the Development Order have occurred or that the Development Order was based on substantially inaccurate infor~.~tion provided by the developer, resultin~ in addi~ional.subatantial regional impacts, then a substantial deviation shall be deemed to have occurred. The monitoring checklist contained in Appendix IV shall be used as a ~uide by ~he local gove~men~ in dece~ining additional s.~s~an~ial ~egional i~accs. BE XT ~ER RESOLED by ~he Board of County Co~issioners of Collier County, Florida, 1. The Collier County Community Developmen~ and Environnen=al Semites Administrator shall be :he local official responsible for assuring compliance wi:h =he :evelopment Order. 2. This Development Order shall remain in effect for =em (I0: years from ~he dace of a~o;:Icn. However, in =he event signlfican= physical ~evelcpmen: has nc: commenced within five years from the date of adop:ion, development approval will =e~inate and this Development Or,er shall no ~:nger be effective. For pu~oses of this retirement, 'si~ificant physical deve!opmen~~ does no~ include r~ads, drainage ~ landscapin~ bu~ does include cons~c~ion of buil~ings o~ ins~a~a~ion of u~ili~ies and facilities such as sewer and wa~e~ lines. This ~ime period may be ex~ended b~ ~he Board of County Commissioners upon a sho~ing of good cause for ~he dela~ in commencemen~ of development. 3. The definitions ccn~ained in Chap~e~ 390, ~lorida ~a~u~es, shall control ~he interrelation and cons~c~ion of ~e~s of ~his Developmen~ Order. 4. Pursuan~ ~o Subsec~icn ~80.06(1~)(c)3, Florida chis projec~ is exe~p~ from do~-zoning o~ in~ensi~y o~ density JAN g 8 1997 ,,,. reduction for a period of ten (10) years from the date of adoption of the Development Order, subject to the conditions and limitations of said Subsection of the S. The applicant or its successor(s) in title to the subject property shall submit a report annually, commencing one year from the effective date of this Development Order, to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, the SWFRPC, and the DCA. This report shall contain the information ray, ired in Section 2.025{?), ~LT~. This report shall be prepared in accordance with the 'DR! Monitoring Format', as may be amended, provided by the SW~P¢. Failure to submit the annual report shall be governed by Subsection 3S0.06(18), 6. The approval granted by this Development Order is limited. Such approval shall no= be construed to obviate the duty of the applicant to comply with all other applicable local, state or federal pernitting procedures. 7. I= is understood that any reference herein to any governmental agency shall Be construed to mean any future instrumentality which may Me created or desigr, ated or successor in in=eras= to, or which otherwise possesses an? of the powers duties cf any referenced govern=eats! agency in existence cn the effective date of this Development Order. S. Appropriate conditions and commitme=ta contained herein may be assigned to or assumed by the lslandWalk Community Development Dis=riot. 9. In the event tha~ e~y portion cr section of this Development Order is de=ermined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner, affect the remaining portions of this Development Order which shall remain in full force and effect. 10. This Development Order shall be bin~ing upon the County and the Developer, their assignees or successors in interest. This Development Order shall become effective as provided 11. by law. JAN 997 1 97 12. Certified copies of this D~velopmen~ Order she1! be provided to the DCA and She SW~RPC es provided in Subsection 380.05(25)(g}, Florida S=a~u~es. Co~issioner offered she foregoing Resolu~ion and moved i~s adoption, seconded by Comm£ss~oner and upon rs1! ca1! the vote vas: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: DONE A~D OR~£RED this .... day of January 1997. BOAJ~DOF COUNTY CO~MISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA bWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM A.%'D LEGAL SUFFICIF_NCy: YARJ081£ M. STUD£.;T ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTOR.%'EY TZHOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAZF~!~'~ JAN ,3 8 1997 £xh£bi~ ~D~ O~ ~he AGENDA.ITEM JAN g 8 1997 AGENDA LTEM, rX:~B~T sA* All of Section 33, Township 48 South, Range 2~ East, County, Florida. Collier AND The Southwest 1/4 o! the Southwest 1/4 of Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 2~ East, subject Co an easement for public road right- of-way over and across the West 30 feeC the=eof and the South 30 feec =hereof. The South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, and subject Co an easement for public road righc-of-wly over end across the West 30 feet thereof. The ~orth ~/~ of the ~rthwest ~/4 of the Southwest 1/4 ~ Se~ 34, To.ship 48 Sou:h, Range 2( East, Collier County, Florida; and subject =o an easemen: for public road right-of-way over and across the North 30 feec thereof and the WeeC 30 fee= thereof. LESS ~%~ EXCEPT: The following described property situa:e, lying end being in Collier County, Florida: The Scu:h 170 fee= of 6eccion 33, Township 48 Sou:h, Range 26 East, and =he Sou:h 146 fee: of Sec:ion 34, To~T. shlp 48 South, Range 26 Eas:; by Order of Taklmg, Case No. 86-1456-CA-01-HDH, recorded in O.R. Book 1215, Page i{62. SURFACE WATER ~A.~AGEME.VT FOOTNOTES: (1) Stage/storage for the project site will be deter~imed at the time of the final design along with the flood routings and configuration for this design. (l) The proposed control elevation of 10.$ NGVD may be low amd will meed to be further evaluated at the time of the ERP application review. Control elevations amd structure locations will also be determined at that time. (3) The water management areas amd BMP's will be reviewed at the time of the ERP application review to ensure that stagnation will not occur. (4) (S) Finished floor and road elevations will be determined by the flood routings provided with the final project design at the time of the ERP application review. The applicant has been coordinating with Collier County officials to determine the upstream flow areas and quantities required to pass through or around the project site. Oc~stream conveyance capacity, project discharge rate, and off-site flows will be reviewed at the time of permit application as they are interdependent and may affect each other. Pro~ect discharges may be l£m£ted to less than the antic:pa:ed rate due to the conveyance capacity of the Vander~:lt aea:h Road ditch. AGENDA ITEM . JAN 2, 8 1997 II ! II il il JAN 2 8 1997 .~. PI. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A RESOLLrrlON OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO~KS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TO CORRECT A SCRIVENER'S ERROR IN THE WOODLANDS DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER, DEVELOPMENT ORDER 96-2, WHICH A_MENDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER 86-1, SECTION 5, TRANSPORTATION, RELATING TO ADDITION OF A ROADWAY SEGMENT FOR MONITORING PURPOSES AND TO CORRECT LEGAL PARTICIPATION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS IN ANY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGE PROCESS. OBJECTIVE: To correct inadvertent omissions from a recently approved Developmen! Order Amendment for the Woodlands Development of Regional Impact CDR,I). CONSIDERATIONS: The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, adopted Resolution 96- 4$2/Development Order 96-2, (the "Development Order") on October 22, 1996, which amended the Development Order 86-1 for the Woodlands Development of Regional Impact; and The Florida Department of Community Affairs (the "Department") notitled County staff and the applicant that the Development Order amendment as adopted did not contain certain changes that had been agreed upon by applicant and were inadvertently omitted from the amended Development Order. Consequently, this further Scrivener's error amendment became necessary. FISCAL IMPACT: None GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: ],,lone AG£NDA.IT£M - JAN 2 8 1997 III I I II II II III I III I IIIII i i PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: That the Scrivener's error amendment as described by the Resolution made a pari of this executive submission be approved. PA ' Y ~oN.~'LD NINO, AICP DATE CHIEF PLANNER REVIEWED BY: CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER DONALD W. ARNOLD, AICP SER~TMENT DIRECTOR DATE DATE C~'VINCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINISIRATOR DATE COMMUNITY DEV. AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS. DRI-96-2 EX SUMMARY/pd 2 .o. JAN 2 8 1997 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION Or THE BOARD O£ COUNTY CO~2~,ISSIONERS O£ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TO CORRECT A SCRIVENER*S ERROR iN THE WOODLANDS DR! D~VELO~ENT ORDER, DEVELOPMENT ORDER 96-2, WHICH AMENDED DL~LOI~,£NT ORDER 86-1, SECTION S, TRANSPORTATION, P~LATIIIG TO ADDITION OF A ROADWAY SEGMENT FOR MONITORING PURPOSES AND TO CORRECT LEGAL PARTICIPATION BY THE DEPARTMENT or COMMUNITY AFFAIRS IN ANY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHA~IGE PROCESS. WHEREAS, the Board of County Corr~lssioners of Collier Cou.-.ty, Florida, adopted Resclu:ion 96-4~2/Development Order 96- 2, (:he "Development Order") on October 22, 1996, which amended the Development Order 86-1 for The Woodlamds Development of Regicnal Impact; and "De;a::men:") notified Coun:y s:aff and the ipplicam~ the: the Development Order amendment as adopted did not contain certain chaz~es that had been agreed =p:n by a~pl~cant, County staff, and the De~ar:ment; and W~ER~S, ~t was discovered that the agreed upon changes that ~ad been reviewed and approved by the Depa:tme~t, Southwest rlo:!da Regional Planning Council, and County staff were inadvertently omitted from the amended Development Order~ and WHER~S, said correction cons=itutes a scrivener~s error. NOW, T~EREFORE, BE ~T RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF cowry CO~ISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, ~RIDA, that: SE~Z~ ~: S~'S ~OR ~S TO ~S~RTATI~ SE~I~ Section S.b.{7)(ii~), Transpor:at~on, is hereby amended to read as follows: ,(iii) The applicant shall file a Notice of Chance within sixty (60) days from the date the County creates an AST for such a deficient road segment that excludes th- are deJc~ons. JAN 2 8 1997 Woodlands DRI. The aoplicant shall file with the Notice of Chan~e, a current traffic analysis and other infor~ation attem:~in~ to establish that the DR! is ncc haying a substantial impact u:on the ~ertlnen: road sec~ent or other ~ustification of the County's exclusion of the DKI from the ASI. If an A$I is es:ablished fcr a~ deficient road seo~ent listed in Section 5 of this Development Order that does not include the Woodlands DRI, the DRI shall not a 1 for or be issued any further Certificates of Public Facilities Ad~ until: Il) the Notice o! Chan~ decision is made b._.~Collier County, If DCA did not submit written ob~ections to Collier Coun~.~_lOUrSUant to Subsection 3~0.0G(I~) (f~rlcztda Statutes and the chance is ad~ Collier Cc~osed; (2} until anneal cf such decision to ~he Florida Land and ~ater Ad~u~Icatc:~ Com~.issicn is resolved. SECTION TWO: SC~IVENER'S ERROR AM~ZDKZNTS TO TRANSPORTATION SECTION SECTION 5.B.(7) {VI), Tr&nspor=atlon, is hereby amended read as follows: Couhnt as ro-csed tire DRI may ~e issued Certificates cf Public Facility Adecuacv · '' · - .c..o~i.,~ the c_~/b~e:ticns ~rlor to the ~ubl:c hear~licant shall not apply for cr be issued Cer=tfica=es of Public Facilit~_Ade=uac~ un:=l the Oead!ine fog =he Colller Ccunt~ deoislcn has excited pursuant to Section 380.07, Florida Statutes and no appea~ has bee~ filed. SECTION THR~E: SCRIVENER'$ ERROR~ZNDD{ENTS TO TRANSPORTATION SECTION SECTION 5.A.(3), Transportation, is ~nended by adding the following road segment to those road segments in Collier County significantly impacted by The woodlands project: CR 951 - Im~,okaiee Road to Boni=a Beach Road Except as specifically modified hereby, Development Order 9(-2 shall remain in full force and effect. ~E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of the Board. -2- 3AN 2 B 1997 THZS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote this day of , 1997. · ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COLrgTY COI~.ISS2ONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: , Chaitm&n Approved as to fo:m and legal su~t£ciency: Student Assistant County Attorney -3- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADOPT AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR MANDATORY STREET NUMBERING OF ALL STRUCTURES AND THE ESTABLISHING OF A GRID PATTERN FOR STREET NUMBERING. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners adopt an ordinance that establishes mandatory street numbering of all structures and a grid pattern for street numbering. CONSIDERATIONS: Florida S~ate Statute, Chapter 125, comains a provision for local governments to adopt regulations designed to promote public health, ~fety, and general welfare of its citizenry. The purpose of mandatory street numbering and the establishment of grid patterns (for street numbering) is to provide for essential emergency services such as fire, police, and ambulance; to facilitate delivery of mail and deliveries; and to assist in locating various points of interest throughout the County. Collier County presently has three Ordinances relating to numbering and addressing. This ordinance will consolidate Ordinance No.'s 79-92, $1-47, and 85-68 into one ordinance for better clarification and to simplify the procedures. This ordinance shall provide specifications for posting official address numbers, procedures for street naming and renaming, and street sign requirements on private streets. The ordinance amendment was discussed by the Development Services Advisory Committee on July 10, 1996. The Committee recommends approval. FISCAL IMPACT: None. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve an amendment to provide mandatory street numbering for all structures. PREPARED BY: Robert Salvaggio, Chs~mer Service Agent Super,'isor Building Review and Permitting /'~- t~ -~..~. Date "°' JAN 2 B 1997 Executive Summary Addressing Ordinance Page Two Building Rfv~md Permitting Vincent A. Cautero, Administrator Community Dev. and Environmental Svcs. Division Date ,JAN ? 8 9 10 II 12 14 16 I? 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 3O ORDINANCE NO. 97-~ AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO MANDATORY S'FREE'I' NLIM~ERING OF ALL STRUCTURES AND THE ESTABLXS}IING OF A GRID PATTERN FOR STREET NUMBERING: PROVIDING FOR STATUTORY AUT~ORI- ZATION: PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING A STATEM£NT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE: PROVIDING FOR DEFINI- TIONS; PROVIDING FOR REQUIREMENTS FOR POSTING OF OFFICIAL ADDRESS NUMBER; PROVIDING FOR EXEMPTIONS POSTING OFFICIAL ADDRESS NIJMBER; PROVIDING FOR SPECIFI- CATIONS FOR POSTING OFFICIAL ADDRESS NUMBER~ PROVIDING FOR APPLICATION FOR NEW OFFICIAL ADDRESS NUMBER~ PRO- VIDING FOR COMPLIANCE RELATING TO NEW CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING REPAIRS: PROVIDING FOR PROCEDURE FOR ESTAb- LISHING A UNIFORM GRID NUMBERING PATTERN FOR ASSIGNMENT OP ADDRESSES OR CHANGE OF ADDRESS~ PROVIDING FOR PROCE- Db'RE FOR CEANGING NON-CONFORMING ADDRESSES~ PROVIDIN(} FOR DULY ADVERTISED PUBLIC hEARING TO RENAME A PROVIDING FOR MONITORING OF THE NAMING OF STREETS, DEVELOPME~'FS, BUILDINGS OR SUBDIVISIONS; PROVIDING PRO- CEDURES FOR STREET NAMING; PROVIDING PROCEDU1LKS FOR STREET REN~,ING; PROVIDING FOR STREET SIGNS ON PRIVATE STREETS; PROVIDING AN APPEAL PROCEDURE; PROVIDING FOR A~ROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS: PROVIDING A WARN- ING ARD DISCLAIMER OF LIABII. IT~; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCE- MENT A~'D PE,*IALTIES; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF COLLIER COU~TY GRDINANCE NOS. 79-92, 81-47 AND eS-6a~ PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERA~ILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE OF IAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFEC- TiVE DATE. 33 ~'HEREA£, the citizens of Collier County, Florida have 34 experienced delays in the arrival of emergency vehicles such as 35 police, fire and ambulance; and 36 W~EREAS, Collier County has implemented the Enhanced 9-1-1 37 System and incorrect addresses delays response time for emergency 38 vehicles; and 39 W~EREAS, the lack of properly numbered structures has often 40 resulted in :he mis-routing of delivery vehicles, ma~l. carrier, 41 and home delivery vehicles; and 42 ~REAS, the lack of properly numbered structures has 43 resulted in unnecessary inconven~ence, discomfort and driving for 44 persons unfamiliar with the COUNTY; and 4~ W~ER'F. AS, Section 3]&.0S, Florida Statutes, authorizes the 4~ Board of County Commissioners to name and rename streets and 47 roads; and 48 W~.ER£AS, Sections 3.2.7.1.2 and 3.2.8.3.19 o~ the Collier 49 County Land Development Code require that no stree:, subdivision 50 or identifying title shall duplicate or closely approximate the 51 I 2 4 6 9 10 12 1,4 16 21 22 2,4 2'7 29 30 33 3,4 35 36 40 name of any other street or subdivision in the inca=par&ted or unincorporated area of Collie~ County; and WH£R£A$, duplication of names of developments, buildings, streets and subdivisions not only causes confusion to the general public but can be a threat to public safety and public safety se=vices. NOW TH£REF0~E, BE IT 0RDAIN£D by the Board of County Commis- sioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: STATUTOR! AUTHORIZATION The legislature of the State of Florida has, in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, delegated the responsibility to lace! govern- mental units to adopt regulations designed to promote the public heal=h, safety and general welfare of its citizenry. SECTION TWO: FINDINGS OF FACT The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, after a public hearing with due public notice, has de:e=~..imed =hat =he public health, safe=y, comfort, good order, convenience, and general welfare would best be served by =he exercise cf the power granted to said Board by said Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, and the adoption of this Ordinance. SECTION THREE: STATEHENT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE It is the intent and purpose of this Ordinance to promote the pu~llc health, safety and gene=al welfare of the citizens and persons in Collier County, Florida by requiring the posting of official address numbers on principal or accessory structures, establishing a procedure for numbering and renumbe=ing develop- ments and procedures for naming, renaming and monitoring street na~es in the uni~corporated areas of Collie= County fo= the pur- pose of providing emergency services such as fire, police, and ambulanceJ to facilitate delivery of mall, official notices, goods and merchandise~ and assist in locating various points of interest throughout the County. SECTION FOUR: DEFINITIONS Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this Ordinance shall be interpreted so as to give them the mean- ing they have in com~on usage and to give this Ordinance its most reasonable application. Accessory Structure: An accessory structure is a structure of a nature customarily incidental and subordinate to the princi- 2 JAN 2 8 1997 I I ises. On the same premises vith respect to accessory uses and 2 structures shall be construed as meaning on the same lot or on a 3 contiguous lot under the same ovnership. 4 Administrative Official: The Build£ng Director or his ~ Designee of Development Services is hereby designated as the 6 Administrative Official and shall be responsible for the ample- 7 mentation and enforcement of this Ordinance. ! Auxiliary Official Address Number: An official address humo 9 bet used to identify an accessory structure, a mobile home or t0 recreational vehicle within a mobile home renta! park or recrea- 11 tional vehicle park, an apartment within an apartment bu£1ding, 12 or any other structure vhich has been determined by the Adm~nis- ~3 tra~iYe Official to require an auxiliary official address. 14 Development: The act, process or result of placing build- I$ ings/and or structures on a lot o~ parcel of land. ~6 Emergency Servic~ shall mean, b~t no~ be limited to f~re and I? police pro~ec~ion, ambulance service and ~he deliYer~ of medical IS services by a physician. 19 G:id: £stablishLng a pattern of Zincs, governed by a point ~0 of or~g~n, on a map of Collier County to identify reference 2t points for the assigning of addresses. ~ Lot: ~or purposes of this Ordinance, a lo~ Lsa parcel of 23 land of at least sufficient size to meet the minimum requirements 24 of the zoning district Ln which it Ls located, for use, coverage, ~ and area, and ~0 provide such yards and o~her open spaces as are 26 required. Such lot shall have frontage on a public street or on 27 an approved private street and may consis~ of: 28 A. A single lot of record; 29 B. A portion of a lot of record; 30 C. A combination of complete lots of record, or complete 31 lots of record and portions of lots of record, or pot- $2 ' tions of lot$ of record; or 33 D. A parcel of land described by metes and bounds. 34 Occupant: Any person, association, partnership, trust, 3~ organization or corporation, other than the owner, who is occupy- 36 ing or leasing the principal or accessory structure for a period 37 exceeding %harry (30) days. 3~ Official Address Number: The official identification number 39 assigned ~o a principal or accessory structure b the JAN 2 8 1997 I ]! ]2 16 1"/ 21 22 23 24 2~ 26 2'7 2S 29 32 24 ~6 39 ,dO rive Official for the purpose of providing its expeditious loca- tion. Owner: Any and all persons, partnerships, trusts, organiza- tions or corporations which own the fee title to the property upon which a principal structure or accessory structure is located. ~al Structure: The structure which serves as the principal use permitted in the zoning district within which it is located. Private Street: Thoroughfare, used for vehicular traffic, which affords the principal means of access to abutting proper- ties, used exclusively for the residents therein. Public Street: Right-of-way, either paved or unpaved, which is intended for vehicular traffic without restriction. SECTION FIVE: REQUIREMENTS FOR POSTING OF OFFICIALADDRE$$ The Owner or Occupant of a Lot upon which a structure is located shall pos= an Official Address Number on the Principal or AccessGry Structure located on said Lot, in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance or within ninety (90} days of the nctlflcation of the address change as provided in Section Eleven. In addition to posting the 0fficial Address Number on the Principal or Accessory Structure, it shall be required that the Owner or Occupant of a waterfront lot shall also 9cst the Official Address Number on the seawall, on the end of a dock or pier or on the boathouse, in accordance with this Ordinance. SECTiON SIX: EX~24~TIONS FR014POSTING OFFZCIALADD~SSN1]M~Ei~ A. Vacant unimproved Lots upon which no structures are located. B. The Administrative Official may grant an exception to the requirements of Section £ive and Seven, after application for an exception by the O~ner and a deter- 'mination by the Administrative Official that one of the following may apply: l. The architectural design is such that strict enforcement will interfere with the function and utility of the architectural theme of the struc- ture. 2. In the case of multi-residential structures, mobile homes and recreational vehicles, strict compliance is not reasonably pose 4 JAN 2 8 1997 I 4 '7 ! 10 II 12 14 25 2'7 29 31 36 3'7 39 4O arrangement, number and location of units involved. 3. Where unusual conditions exist or vhere the liters! interpretation of Section Five or Seven viii create a hardship, the Ad~tntstrative Official may deviate from the specifications of Section Five or Seven provided such deviation viii not circumvent the intent and purpose of this Ordinance. In the granting of an exception, the Administrative Official may spec£fy conditions and specifications upon vhtch exception is granted. SECTION SLe~I~T: SI~cIr~C~TIONS FOR ~ST~ O~lC~ ~D~SS ~O~BER(S) A, Official Address Number(s) on structures shall be Arabic ~n design and have a minimum height of four (41 inches. Such numbers shall be mounted tn a secure fashion to the structure's front vall or other fixed appurtenance in the front of the structure within five (5) fee~ of the main entry way or main path of travel vhich ieads to the main entrance from a Public or Private Street or shall be otherwise separately mounted in a ~anner upon the face of a wall or fence o~ upon a post in the front yard of the Lot. Numbers shall be mounted at a height between four {4) feet and ten (~0) feet above the ad~acent street grade or exterior landing beneath, but never higher than fifteen (15) feet above the ad~ointng grade. They shall be sufficienti¥ legible as to contrasting back- ground, arrangement, spacing, size and untfoz~ity of integers so that the numbers may be read with ease ' ~uring daylight hours by a person possessing at least tuenty/forty (20/40) vision if he viers the n~unbers from the center line of the abutting street. The numbers shall be so placed that trees, shrubs and other ohs:ructions do not block the line of sight of the n~mbers from the center of the street. Wherever practicable and in accordance vith these specifications, the Official Address Nt~i placed as close to a light source as po,. JAN $ 1997 5 I 2 4 6 ? I0 II 12 13 16 19 20 2! 22 23 2~ 26 27 29 31 36 40 tO make it ~ore visible at night. If not near a light source, the number shall be made of reflective material. In the case of an apartment building which contains a series of individual apartment units within a principal apartment building, the following shali apply: 1. The principal apartment building shall be con- sidered as the Principal Structure and shall be numbered in accordance with Sections Five and Seven, A, above. 2. In addition to the Official Address Number of the main apartment building, such number shall include a by-line indicating the Official Address Number of the apartment unit(s} within the apartment building. These numbers shall be of the same size as the principal add:ess number and shall be indi- cated as demonstrated in the following graphic drawing: SEE EXHIBIT A In the case of a mobile home park or recreational vehi- cle park, the park and the Lois within the park shall be numbered as follows: 1. The mobile home park or recreational vehicle park shall be considered as the Principal Structure and shall be numbered in accordance with Sections Five and Seven, A, a~ve. 2. In addition to the Official Address N~e: of the mobile home or recreational vehicle park, each located within the park shall be given an Auxil- iary Official Address N~eg which shall ~ indi- cated as demonstrated in the following graphic drawing: SEE EXHIBIT B In instances ~hete a main entr~ay of a structure not clearly visible fr~ a Public or Private Street, the Owner shall be required, In addition to the requirements of Section rive and Section Seven, to,st the Official Address N~et tn a conspicuous place the drive~ay serving the structure and th~ rlg~~ dAN 2 8 1997 I 2 6 ? ! 9 II 16 · l! 36 37 ~8 29 40 of the Public Street or the easement line of a private street ss the case may apply. S££ £X~IBZT C I~OR SP£cIr:c R£OU~R~.£hTS £. Nhetevet required by law that the Offices! Address bet be placed on a mailbox ~n order to receive U.S. Marl, the O~ner shall be required to post the Official Address Number on both sides of the uallbox ia addition to p2acing the Official Address Number off the Principal at Accessory Structure as re,ired in this Ordinance. r. Zn the case of a ~atetfroflt lot, the ~et shall be :eq~ted to post the Official Address N~er off t~e sea~a~2, the end of t~e pier or dock, or off the ~et*s boa:Aouse according to the fo~lo~ing specif~cat~ons: Official Address N~et(s) sha~l be ~ab~c design and have a mtn~ height of six ~c~es. Such nu~ets shall be mounted ~n a secure fast,on on the ~atets~de of the structure so as to be c2eat~y v~s~b2e by pass~ng ~at operators using the abutting ~atet~ay. 2. O~c~a~ Add:ess Nu~ets sha~ be mounted at a ~e~ght between ~out (4) feet and ten (~0) ~eet above the abutting ~atet~ay as measured ~tom the ~a:~ona~ Geodetic Vett~ca~ Dat~. They sha~ be su~c~ent2y 2eg~b~e as to ConttastAng background, a:tange~eflt, spactflg, s~2e and un~fo~tty o~ gets so that the fl~ets ~y be read ~th ease during daylight hours by a person possessing at ~east t~enty/fo:ty (20/40) v~ston ~ he v~e~s the nu~ets ~tom ~th~n 200 feet on the abutt~flg ~atet~ay. T~e fl~ets sha~ be so p~aced that other obstructions do not b~ock the 2~ne o~ s~ght o~ the n~ets ~ the abutting ~atet~ay.. 3. Zt sha~ be requited that a~ O~f~c~a~ Address ~u~e:s be p~aced c~ose to a 2tght source oF o~ te~ect~ve mate:ta~s so as to be v~stb~e at night by the operator of a pass~ng boat oF by s~fltng a f~ash~ght on the SECTZO~ EZGH~: ~PLZ~TZ~ Rny O~ne: requiring a ne~ Official Rddress N~r shall apply to the Ad=intstrat~ve Official vho shall fu:nishN~ JAN g 8 ! 2 3 4 6 $ 9 I0 II 12 ~3 14 16 I$ 19 2O 21 22 23 2d 2'7 2Z 29 3O 31 32 33 3~ 36 3~ 39 4O with same. To be assigned the proper street number and name, the O~ner must provide a legal description of the subject property to the Administrative Official. SECTIO~ N17~Z: CCe4YLIA~ ~LATIT~G TO ~ C~~Z~ OR All new cons~ruc~ion o= building repairs re~i~ng a County building pe~t shall comply Ordinance prior ~o ~he final s~ruc=u=al inspec~ion or final building repair inspec=ion by the Inspec=lons Section of Collie= Coun=y's Building Review and Pe~i~ing ~pa~=men~. A ca~e of Occupancy shall no~ be ~ssued un=il ~ has been verified by =he Addressing Section of Collie= Coun=y's Building Review and Perm~=~ing Depaf~men~ ~ha= ~he building has been properly ~um- bered in accordance with th~s Ordinance. SECTI~ ~: PR~ ~R ES~LISHING PA~ ~R ~SI~ OF ~D~S~S OR C~ OF ~D~SS A. The following Grids are es=ablished in Collier Coun=y for ~he assigning of addresses =o s=ruc=ures: nor~h/sou~h and eas~/wes~. The poin~ of o=~gi~ for ~his Gr~d shall be Central Avenue and ~he Gulf of eas[/wes[ and north/sou~h of poin[ of origin. The in=errs1 of lines shall con=lnue: North - [o =he Collier County line, Sou=h - to [he Gulf of Hexico excluding Marco, and Eas[ - to 1-75 and C.R./S.R. 951. 2. Area of Golden Gale Grid A pattern north/south and this Grid shall Gate Boulevard. North - to of intersecting lines running east/west. The point of origin for start at Wilson Boulevard and Golden The interval of lines shall continue: the Collier County line and S.R. 858, north/south South - to the Gulf of Nexico East - to the Collier County line, and West - to 1-75 and C.R./S.R. 951. Area of Harco Island Grid A pattern of intersecting and east/west with the p~ lnt JAN 2 8 1997 [ ! 2 4 ? 11 14 ~? 24 3o 32 36 ~o beginning at S.R. 92 and the Gulf of Mexico. This Grid shall encompass all of Marco Island. 4. Area of ~okalee Grid A pattern of intersecting lines running north/south and east/vest with the point of origin starting at Main Avenue (S.R. 29) and ££rst Street (S.R. 846). The interval of lines shall continue: North - to the Collier County line, South - to S.R. 858 and S.R. 846, West - to the Collier County line, east line of Range 27 and Oil Well Grade Road, and East - to the Collier County line. B. Odd nu.~bers will be assigned to the buildings on the north and west sides of the Public or Private Streets, even numbers wi~! be assigned to the buildings on the south and east side of the Public or Private Street. C. The assignment o~ numbers on corner lots shall be de~ermined ~rom the Public or Private Street on which access to the building is obtained unless unique and unusual circumstances exist as determined by the Admin- ls~rative Of[~cial. D. ~n cases in which the Public or Private Street runs both north/south and east/west, the grid direction shall be determined by the predominant proportional length of the ~ublic or Private Street. £. Main arterials which pass through more than one grid sha~l not have more than one addressing system. F. Where more than two units exist within a building, the entire building shall have a princlpo! number with an Auxiliary Officia! Address ~umber for each ~ndividua! unit, unless it is more reasonable or practical to assign Officia! Address Numbers to each unit. The Actministrative O~ficia! shall at his discretion, re~inquish precedence of the specified grid system in cases where it would be more reasonable or practical to assign a street address based on a nu~bering system used by a municipa~ity or subdivision. W~ere ~e ex~sting build~ng nu~e; does no~ requite~en~s provided for by this Ordinance, the JAN 2 8 1997 I$ 16 17 20 21 22 26 27 2~ 3o 31 32 35 36 40 Official shall provide a "Change of Address Notice" to the Owner of the building. A building number shall be considered non-conforming if it does not conform with the grid numbering system established by this Ordinance, if the nund=er is out of sequence with other supers on the street, or if an odd or even 6 number is on the wrong side of the Street. A "Change of Address ? Notice" shal! contain the following: S A. The correct address number, previous number and 9 requirement that the property Owner or Occupan~ pos~ 10 the nu~e= tn accordance v/th the requirements of this I1 Ordinance within ninety (90) days fr~ the date o~ the B.The name of the p=oper~y ~e= and legal description. The date of the A copy of ~he "Change of ~dd~ess Notice" shall be kept on ~[e ~n ~he ~eco~ds/~ddresstnq Section of =he Collie= County Building Review and Pe~l~ing ~par~men[ and all ~he appropriate agencies shall be no[iliad of the change. Within ni~e=y (90) days from the da[e of the Change of Address", =he ~ne= or Occupant of the property shall conform the address n~er ~o the requirements of [his Ordinance. S~T Pursuant [o Section 336.05, Florida S=a=ues, the Board of Coun=y Commissioners is au~horized to rename s=~eets and roadways in [he unincorpora=ed areas of the County after a duly advertised public hearing and only upon a super maJo=i=y vote of at least four affirmative vo~es. However, State roads lying in the unin- corporated areas of Collie= County a=e n~e=ed by the Florida Depar[men= of Transports[ion (~T). ~S, BWI~GS OR No s~ree=, development, building, or subdivision shall bear =he same name or a similar sounding name as BriO=her develops[, building, subdivision o= street in the incorporated or unincor~- rs=ed area of Collier County, except the ~Jor s~ree[ within a subdivision or deveiopmen~ ~y u~ilize [he sa~ name as the development. The A~inistra~ive Official shall monitor the naming of all s=ree~s, developments, buildings oz order =o elimina=e duplications and avoid confusi No. JAN 2 8 1997 10 I 4 $ 6 ? ! 9 I0 I! 14 16 I? 19 23 ~6 ~9 ~6 ~? ~9 At the tLme oL s~d~v~sLon p~at or sLte deve~o~enC approval, s~tee~ names of both /n~ernal and external stFee=s assigned ~ the developer and reviewed ~y the A~n~stzatLve O~ficial prior to ~inal approva~ of the su~ivision or ~evelop- ment pXan. ;he ~d~tessLng SectLon o~ the CoX~et County BuLXd~ng Re,Lev and Pe~ttLn~ ~partment abaCI review the name to avoLd dupl~catLon ~ street names. The ~ddressLng Section aXso has the zesponsibility o~ ~intaining street address maps and assigning s~zeec nu~ezs. Requests to rename a street, both private and public, are ~a~e by su~tt~nq an application to Planninq SedUces by the O~net/O~nets. A street can be renamed by a~y one of the lng: A. Renamin~ Streets by ~etition Applican: mus~ first verify ~lth ~he Addresstnq/Reco~ds Section of the Collier County Building Review and Per- mit:in~ ~paztmen: ~hat ~he prcposed stree~ name is a duplica~ion. A peri:ion of f~fty percen~ plus one of the prop- er;y owners abutting the street to be zen~ed may be submitted to Planning Services with the necessary application, site plan of the street to ~ renamed and a list of all property o~ets abutting the street to be renamed. The application shall include: (~) peti- tioner's name, address and telephone numar, (2) leqal description or location of the street, (3) present street name, and (4) reason for ze~estin9 n~e chanqe. Applicable a~inistzative fees in accordance with Fee Resolution No. 95-642 or its successor Resolution are kequired for each property o~er ze~izing notification of the proposed street name chanqe. B. Renamin~ of Streets Where ~plicate Names Exist The A~inistrative Official or his designee can submit an application to the Board of County Co~issioners for a street name chan~e ,here the public hea~th, safety and 9eneral welfare wou~d be affected by the existence of a duplicate street name. JAN 2 8 19 7 1 4 6 7 8 9 1o II 12 14 17 18 19 20 24 26 29 30 22 24 26 ~9 40 of street name. Upon submittal of a petltLon, application or request for street renaming, the Administrative Official determ/nes if the proposed name Is tn conflict with any existing street name and verifies the ownership of the property ovner(s) requesting the street name. Zn determining if the proposed name is tn conflict with existing street names, the Administrative Official reviews for duplication, assimilation and if portion or portions of street name has been used repet/ttvely. Upon reasonable review of the pet/t/on, application or request of street rename by the Administrative Official, the Planning Services staff will schedule a public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners, not/fy the property owners abut- ting the street of the proposed street name change, and make a reco~=endation to the County Hanaqer's Office. Notification of a public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners shall be given to abutting property owners fifteen (15) days prior to the public hear£ng. After a duly advertised public hearing and upon the Board of County Co.~mtsstoners, approval, the A~tntstrattve Offtcta! will notify all appropriate governments! agencies and property owners abutting the street being renamed. The Addressing Section has the responsibility of maintaining street address maps and assigning street numbers. SECTZON S/X~.:E~: PROVI'DE FOR fl'R,KET SZG~S OII IvR/%rATZ S'I'3t.~ETS Zn the case of private streets, Lt abel! be the Owner/Owner(s) responsibility to provide for the street sign dis- playing the new approved street name in accordance with the United States Department of Transportation and Faders! ~tqhway Administration (U.S.D.O.?.F.H.W.A.) '~anual on Ontform Traffic Control Devices". A. The Co/i/er County Code Enforcement Board sha!! hear and decide appeals from the requirements of this Ordi- nance when there is a disagreement of an tnte~reta- tion, zequtrement, or determination made by the Admin- istrative Offlc£s! in the enforcement ~ -~,q~,~s~(~ of this O~dtnance. Such appeal shall fll~.~ JAN 2 8 997 Street Renaming by Board of County Commissioners The Board of County Co~taatoners may tequesta change ! Code £nforcement Board within ten (10) days of the 2 disagreement, decision or dete~minacion and the 3 aggrieved person shall furnish a copy of such appeal to 4 the A~inistrative Official. ~ B. The applicable filing fee in accordance with Fee Reso- 6 lution Ho. 95-642 or its successor resolution is ? required for each appeal. ! C. Any person adversely affected by the decision of the 9 Collier County Code Compliance Enforcement Board may l0 appeal such decision to the Circuit Court, as provided Il by law. ]3 A. This Ordinance is not intended to repeal, abrogate, or ]4 impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed I~ restrictions. However, where this Ordinance and 16 another conflict or overlap, whichever imposes the more l? st:in;ent restrictions shall prevail. 15 B. In the interpretation and application of this Ordi- 19 nance, all provisions shall be: (1) considered as 20 minimum requirements; (2] liberally ¢onst~ed in favor 21 of the governing body; and (~] deemed neither to limit ]2 nor repeal any other powers granted under State 23 Statutes. 2~ The degree of protection re~ited by this Ordinance ~s con- 26 side,ed reasonable rot re~ulatoty purposes. This Ordinance shal~ 27 .not create l~ability on the part of Colllet County ot by any 2; officer or employee the=eof for any damages that result from 29 reliance on this Ordinance or any a~in~sttat~ve decision law- ~0 fully made thereunder. 35 SECTI~ ~: ~~ ~ ~TIES 32 A. ~ny person or entity who violates any provision of this 33 Ordinance shall be punished as provided by law. 34 B. In addition to the criminal penalties provided by law, 3~ power Is heceby authorized to institute any appropriate 36 action or proceeding including suit fo~ ~nJunctive 37 relief in order to prevent or abate violation of this 3, Ordinance. 39 SEC~ZOH ~-0~: ~ JAN 2 8 1997 24 27 28 29 JO 4O 42 I Collier County Ordinance Nos. 79-92, 81-47 and 85-68 are 2 hereby repealed in their entirety. 3 ~C~ZC~T ~-~q~O: CCqi72,ZCTA,k'D 4 In the event this Ordinance conflicts ~lth any other otdi- S nance o~ Cold,et County ot other applicable 2a~, the more 6 restrictive sba22 apply. Z~ any phrase et port,on 7 ~ance ~s held ~nval~d ot unconst~tut~ona~ by any court I petent ~u:2Jdlctlon, such port,on ihs22 be deemed I separate, 9 ~lst~nct, a~d independent provision and ~uch hold~ng aha22 not ~0 a~ect the validity o~ the remaining I] s~z~ ~-~: ~S2~ ~ ~Z O~ ~S ~ I~ T~e ptov~s~ons o[ t~Ls O;d~nance s~a~ become and be made a 13 ~a~C ~ ~e C~e o~ ~avs and Ot~L~a~ces o~ Co~Let 14 Florida. The sections o~ the Ordinance may be ren~ered or l~ :eletteted to accomplish auch~ and the ~otd ~otd~nance~ ~ay be ~e c~a~ge~ :o "~ec:~on~, ~a:tlcle~, ot any other appropriate ~ASS~D A~D DULY A~TED by the Board of County Co~lssioners ~f Collier Court:y, Florida this _ day of , 2996. ATTEST: BO~D OF COUNTY CO~ISSIONZRS DWIGHT ~. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, ~RIDA Approved as to foz~ and legal sufficiency: Heidi r. Ashton Assistant County Attorney By: · Chairman 14 AGE.NC)AFl'EM. ,,JAN 2 8 1997 2222 STREET S.W. APARTMENTS 44 THRU 55 OFFICIAl, ADDRESS ~Krt~ER OF ACCESSORY STRUCTI~r. AG£~D~ ITEM % JAN 2, 8 1997 2222 STREET LOT 33 I~'MBER AND ~'P. EET , ~ N,~MK OF MOBILE HO~E OFFICIAL ADDRESS NU~BER 0F INDIVIDUAL MOBILE H0~E ~ITHI~ THE MOBILE HOME PARK "°' ~~ JAN 2 8 1997 | 2222 STREET LOT 33 OFFICIAl, ADDRESS ,N~'M~ERAI~D~ JNAME OF MOBI. LE HOME PARK OFFICIAL ADDRESS NUMBER OF INDIVIDUAL MOBILE HOME WITHIN THE MOBILE HOME PARK ~--2' MAX. ---~ MA~ ~GHT 3' Ae0VE GROUND I ~r oF P~'euc o~. P.WZVAT~ srmm~ 2222 ~.*'T. e w I "-.i.(~I~NDA ITEM J JAN281997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 ADOPTED BUDGET. OBa'ECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution and the related amendments which amend the Fiscal Year 1995-96 adopted budget in accordance with Section 129.06, Florida Stattrtes. CONSIDERATIONS: Section 129.06, Florida Statutes defines how an annual budget, as adopted by the Board, can be amended. Budget amendments that increase the total appropriations of a fund over the adopted annual budget may be approved by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners a.tier an advertised public hearing. Budget amendments requiring such approval include the appropriation of carry forward, interfund transfers, and supplemental revenue. This is a public hearing to amend the budget for Fiscal Year 1995-96. The attached resolution and the summary of the resolution have been advertised and have been available for public review and inspection with the related budget amendments and executive summary at the Office of Management and Budget. The amendments and summary are included herein by reference in the resolution. FISC4~L IMPACT: The amendments and executive summaries which were previously considered and approved by the Board contained their respective fiscal impact statements. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt the attached resolution amending the Fiscal Year 1995-96 adopted budget. PREPAREDBY: ~ ~ Robin Bialkoski,.Senior Secretary BY: /t7 ~ ~ ~~ - Date: /"-/~- ~,~ Michael Smykowski, Management and Budget Director AGENDA ITEM so., JAN 2 8 1997 Pi. I COUNTY OF COLLIER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSES TO AMEND ITS FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 ADOPTED BUDGET All interested parties are invited to attend a public hearing on this matter to be held on January 28, 1997 at 9:00 AM or soon thereafter, in the County Commissioner's Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida. A copy of the proposed Budget Amendment Resolutions and background material will be available for public inspection on weekdays between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM at the Office of Management and Budget, 2nd Floor, Administration Building. A final decision on the amendments will be made at this meeting. Listed below are the amendments to be considered and their purpose. Dwight E. Brock, Clerk Board of County Commissioners By:/s/Sue Barbiretti, Deputy Clerk Collier County Florida Timothy L. Hancock, Chairman Budget Amend. Fund Change Fund No. No. Fund Title Amount Total 96-514 411 96-516 413 96-522 521 Water Capital Impact PURPOSE:. To move water capital projects funds to correct impact fee funds and to adjust carry forward and impact fee revenue estimates. County Sewer Impact Fees PURPOSE:. To move wastewater capital projects funds to correct impact fee funds and to adjust carry forward and impact fee revenue estimates. Fleet Management PURPOSE: To recognize additional estimated revenues and expenses for parts, sublet repairs, and fuel. 39,500 5,406,400 409,800 9,445,400 150,000 2,408,300 AGENDA ITEM No. JAN 2 8 1997 Pg., Budget Amend. No. Fund No. Fund Title Change Amount Fund Total 96-523 96428 96-531 96-537 96-542 96-555 96-556 96-565 001 589 001 121 001 301 299 326 General Fund PURPOSE: To appropriate building maintenance services revenue. OCPM PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward for computer hardware and soft-'are and building improvements. General Fund PURPOSE: Partial repayment to General Fund for initial seed money to set up the OCPM Department. Urban Improvement Grants PURPOSE: To reimburse Department of Community Affairs for program income received. General Fund PURPOSE: To appropriate private contributions for a scoreboard for the ENCP Roller Hockey Facility. Facilities Management CIP PURPOSE: To recognize additional revenue from fire districts and internal users based on final 800 MHz radio equipment purchases. Commercial Paper Debt PURPOSE: To appropriate transfer to pay interest on 800 MHz debt service. Naples Park Assessment Project PURPOSE: To appropriate transfer of loan proceeds for Naples Park Drainage Project. 40,700 512,722 200,000 1,907 3,526 442,000 225,000 3,000,000 101,232,888 4,358,606 101,432,888 66,321 101,436,414 25,282,851 7,610,500 3,000,000 AGENDA ITEM No. JAN 2 8 Lq,97 r'g 3 Budget Amend. No. Fund No. Fund Title Change Amount Fund Total 96-566 96-573 96-551 96-582 96-591 96-593 299 491 505 505 001 301 Commercial Paper PURPOSE: To initiate construction phase of Naples Park Drainage Project. Loan proceeds will be obtained through a commercial paper draw and transferred to capital project fund. Emergency Medical Services Grants PURPOSE: Appropriate interest earnings to complete Grant Project. Information Technology PURPOSE: To appropriate revenues received for remodeling and new construction generally performed during normal business hours. Information Technology PURPOSE: To appropriate additional revenues to cover telephone charges and maintenance and to complete phone system switch upgrades. General Fund PURPOSE: To print name badges and decals which will enable residents/owners to re-enter an evacuated area following a disaster. Count)wide Capital Projects PURPOSE: To appropriate General Fund transfer for the Streetscape Master Plan. 3,000,000 7,520 34,900 377,700 22,000 25,000 10,610,500 186,418 1,365,800 1,743,500 101,458,414 25,307,851 AGENDA ITEM No.,/2C5) JAN 2 8 Budget Amend. No. Fund No. Fund Title Change Amount Fund Total 96-594 96-597 96-606 96-615 96-614 96-620 191 325 602 001 491 040 SHIP Fund PURPOSE: To appropriate SHIP program carry forward for down payment assistance. Water Management CIP PURPOSE: To appropriate matching funds for the SFWMD/BCB to conduct a Comprehensive Basin Study. Confiscated Trust Fund PURPOSE: Appropriate confiscated property proceeds to fund equipment budgeted in FY95, but not ordered until FY96. General Fund PURPOSE: To appropriate the maintenance services revenues for special services. Emergency Medical Services Grant Fund PURPOSE: To purchase a pediatric seat with interest earnings. Sheriff PURPOSE: General Fund transfer to fund Sheriffs Office increased personal services expenses. 170,000 50,000 90,000 39,600 252 604,600 1,718,400 1,378,578 835,888 101,498,014 186,670 45,537,900 Budget Amend. No. Fund NO. Fund Title Change Amount Fund Total 96-628 96-630 96-632 111 301 137 MSTD General Fund PURPOSE: To recognize revenue from Heritage Country Club CDD application fee to cover review costs. County Wide CIP PURPOSE: General fund transfer for emergency repairs to main complex chilled water system. North Naples Roadway PURPOSE: To appropriate carryfor, vard to fund fiscal agent fees and increase reserves. 15,000 27,445 l,lgg 12,543,636 25,335,296 1,188 AGENDA ITEM No./~ C ('~ JAN 2 8 Lq97 3 6 g I0 II 12 14 16 I? II 19 2O 21 23 :26 2'7 28 29 3O NO. A RESOLL~ION PURSt'A.~'T TO SECTION fLORIDA STATLT£S, TO AM£ND THE BL'DGET FOR THE 1995/96 FISCAL 31 32 33 3~ 36 37 3g 40 41 411 96-J 14 424.J00 413 96-~16 1.412,J00 ' (I,002,700) 521 9~$22 I J0.000 001 96-J23 40,700 519 96-521 Jl2,722 O01 96- ~ ) I 001 96'J42 301 96-JJ~ (Jl?.lO0) 129.100 299 96-~,6 326 96-~6S 3.0~.0~ 299 96-566 3.000.000 491 96.5?3 - ! - S,327.400 40.700 1'75.604) 3,526 217.0OO 225,000 3,000.000 12.000 (I,491..100) 337.122 20Q.O~O I .~7 FLeD CARRY FORWARD BUDGET OR INCREASE INCREASE A.%lE~D~,I£.*gT II~TE RFL.'~D cDECI~ASEI ID£CIU:ASE! ?¢L;MBER$ I"R~NSFERS IP~CElrr EXPENDITI:R.~ /NCREASE ¢DECREASE) RESERVES INCIU~ASE IDECREASEI I%TERFL~D TRANSFERS $ 9 10 II 12 14 17 II 19 20 21 2,1 26 21 29 30 31 32 505 ~-511 3,1.900 34.900 505 96-~12 129,600 129.~ O01 ~591 22.0013 22.000 )01 N-593 25.1300 191 96.594 170.000 170.6O0 325 96-597 25,00O 6O2 96-6O6 I I I,.10~ 491 96-614 252 252 040 96-620 604,600 604.600 I I ! ¢M421 15,000 I 301 96-630 2?.445 27.445 13'/ 96-632 I I.Y/I I,I II 21,104 10.190 BE IT FURTI~R RESOLVI:D that the Cle'k b he.by ordered and db'ec~ed Io sffead this Resolution in full amo~I the minm~ of this meeti~I for petmeen! record in his office. l~is Re.,elulio~ adopted are matron. ~c~d and major~, vme fr, or~nI same. DATED: ATTEST' DtA1GHT E. BROCK. Clerk By: BOARD OF Cou~r'Y COMMISSIO.%'F_.RS COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR. IDA 31 A[.,f,,-o~,ed as to form and 39 lelal su f1'~c eoT: 45 Collier Cou~l~ A~lorne~. By: T~mod~ L. Ilancock. Chau'man JAN 28 1997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 ADOPTED BUDGET. OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached resolution and the related amendments which amend the Fiscal Year 1996-97 adopted budget in accordance with Section 129.06, Florida Statutes. CONSIDERATIONS: Section 129.06, Florida Statutes defines how an annual budget,, as adopted by the Board, can be amended. Budget amendments that increase the total appropriations of a fund over the adopted annual budget may be approved by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners after an advertised public hearing. Budget amendments requiring such approval include the appropriation of carry forward, interfund transfers, and supplemental revenue. This is a public hearing to amend the budget for Fiscal Year 1996-97. The attached resolution and the summary of the resolution have been advertised and have been available for public review and inspection with the related budget amendments and executive summary at the Office of Management and Budget. The amendments and summary are included herein by reference in the resolution. FISCAL IMPACT: The amendments and executive summaries which were previously considered and approved by the Board contained their respective fiscal impact statements. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt the attached resolution amending the Fiscal Year 1996-97 adopted budget. PREPARED BY: Robin Bialkoski,.Senior Secremo' Date: Michael Smykowski, Management and Budget Director AGENDA ITEM JAN 2 8 1997 COUNTY OF COLLIER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSES TO AMEND ITS FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 ADOPTED BUDGET All interested parties are invited to attend a public hearing on this matter to be held on January 28, 1997 at 9:00 AM or soon thereafter, in the County Commissioner's Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tarniami Trail East, Naples, Florida. A copy of the proposed Budget Amendment Resolutions and background material will be available for public inspection on weekdays between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM at the Office of Management and Budget, 2nd Floor, Administration Building. A final decision on the amendments will be made at this meeting. Listed below are the amendments to be considered and their purpose. Dwight E. Brock, Clerk Board of County Commissioners By:/s/Sue Barbiretti, Deputy Clerk Collier County Florida Timothy L. Hancock, Chairman Budget Amend. Fund Change Fund No. No. Fund Title Amount Total 97-001 115 97-002 115 97-009 195 Sheriff's Grants PURPOSE:. Recognize federal COPS grant funding to combat domestic violence. Sheriffs Grants PURPOSE: Recognize the SHOCAP anti-drug abuse grant. Tourist Development - 60% PURPOSE: To reappropriate FY96 carry forward ofunexpended Category "A" project funds. 195,700 1,426,670 183,957 1,610,627 926,172 10,709,944 AGENDA ITEM No. IP. JAN 2 8 1997 Pg.,,, Budget Amend. No. Fund No. Fund Title Change Amount Fund Total 97-011 97-012 97-013 97-015 97-020 97-024 97-026 589 301 · 111 115 368 414 350 Office of Capital Projects Management PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward to reconfigure the office space in building D. Co. Wide Facilities Capital PISRPOSE: To recognize ca~ forward for projects not completed in FY96. MSTD General Fund PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward to offset costs of CDD application reviews. Sheriffs Grants PURPOSE: To appropriate grant award for Collier Count3' D.U.I. Enforcement Project. Naples/Urban Collier County Parks Impact Fee PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward funds to complete the Immokalee Football/Soccer Field. Wastewater Capital Projects PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward for the relocation of the sewer and effluent lines in connection with the construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Project. EMS Impact. Fees PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward to complete the Corkscrew EMS Station. 30,000 34,170 55,566 227,700 49,008 10,910 16,879 3,721,200 29,495,240 13,572,128 1,838,327 3,227,016 19,624,420 626,058 Budget Amend. ~0. 9%025 97-038 97-039 97-040 97-042 97-043 97-049 97-057 Fund No. 301 115 602 115 368 412 111 495 Fund Title Change Amount Co. Wide Facilities Capital PLrRPOSE: To appropriate carry forward to complete IT Office Modernization program. 78,100 Sheriff's Grants PURPOSE: To appropriate grant funds for DP equipment. 202,500 Confiscated Trust Fund PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward to provide matching funds for Local Law Enforcement Block Grant. 27,982 Sheriffs Grants PURPOSE: To appropriate block grant and matching funds to purchase communications equipment. 251,831 Naples/Urban Collier County Park Impact Fees 260,000 PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward to complete the Marco Island Racquet Center Project. County Water Capital Projects PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward to complete the Water Treatment Plant Chlorine Enclosure. 44,308 MS'ID General Fund PURPOSE: To recognize carry forward to offset costs of application processing for the Dove Point CDD. 14,896 Airport Authori~'y PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward to fund supplies/equipment forecast to be purchased in the prior fiscal year. 9,942 Fund Total 29,573,340 2,040,g27 210,764 2,292,658 3,487,016 13,077,916 13,587,024 1,101,584 AGENDAITEM No. JAN 2 8 1997 ,-/ Budget Amend. No. 97-067 97-071 97-075 97-076 9%080 97-081 97-082 97-083 97-084 9%086 9%087 9%088 Fund No. 490 123 152 115 325 313 331 333 334 338 339 340 Fund Title EMS PURPOSE: To appropriate fire district revenue for costs of the First Respond Medical Training. Collier Co. Services for Seniors PURPOSE: To reflect an increase in the Title III-D Grant awarded to the Count)' for providing homemaking services to frail elderly residents. Lely Golf Estates Beautification PURPOSE: To appropriate carry fom'ard to complete remaining landscape and irrigation improvements. Sheriff's Grants PURPOSE: To recognize U.S. Department of Justice award for the Church Arson Prevention Program. Water Management CIP PURPOSE: To recognize Big Cypress Basin Board contributions for canal and basin studies. Road Construction Gas Tax CIP PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward for ongoing projects. Road Impact Fee District 1 Road Impact Fee District 3 Road Impact Fee District 4 Road Impact. Fee District 8 Road Impact Fe~ District 9 Road Impact Fee District 10 PURPOSE: To appropriate carry forward for ongoing road projects initiated in FY96, but not completed prior to the end of FY96. Change Amount 29,177 1,308 72,800 4,600 85,000 1,863,879 1,195,017 824,405 122,419 539,362 276,893 33,658 Fund Total 7,573,554 284,308 248,700 2,297,258 2,645,200 16,912,858 8,745,434 4,875,410 1,228,938 2,195,824 831,886 120,816 AGENDAITEM No.~ JAil 2 8 1997 Budget Amend. No. 97-093 Fund No. I01 Fund Title Road and Bridge PURPOSE:. The transfer from the Oeneral Fund is decreased due to the recognition of an additional $41,300 in FDOT sweeping and mowing reimbursement revenue. Change Amount Fund Total 7,707,000 AGENDA ITEM JAN 2 8 1997 pg. ~ _ RESOLt'TION NO. 99.BAR-2 A RESOLLTION PL'RSUA.~T TO SECTION 129.06t2), FLORIDA STATLTES, TO AMEND THE BUDGET FOR THE 199~-97 FISCAL YEAIL 9 WHEREAS. Section 129.06(2). Florida Sutmes. provides ~a~ ~e Beard of Count,. Cemmissieeefl (l~ereinafl~ 10 also referred m m 'Board') a~ my time ~.tthln a t't~il ye~t may amend a budge~ fm ~a~ ytat, and ~ ~ ~ 19 I~oJut~l put-,~nt to Sectme 129.06, FIo~la Statues. 20 NOW, 'f14~EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY ~ BOARD OF COLrNTY COMM1SSIONI~RS OF COLLIER 21 COL.~TY, FLOIUDA, that the budle~ m~e~dmenu m ~e 1996~T FY B~lle ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 24 f~CREASE 25 ('DECREASE) 26 CARRY 29 FORWARD 28 BU13GET OR 29 A .~,~NDM Lr~'T ~O FL~'D 1%'U~BERS TILANSFERS fNCILEASE I~CREASE INCREASE (DEC'RF. ASE) (DECR~AS£) (DECREASE) (DECREASE} II,,'TER. FU%'D RECEIFT EXPENDITURE ILESERV1~S TRANSFERS 31 32 115 99-001 33 lis 99-002 ~4 19S 97*009 , 926.172 35 ~19 9T*OII 36 301 97-OI2 34,170 37 III 97-013 38 115 .97-015 39 368 99-O2O 49.00! dO 414 97*024 lO.glO ~1 3~0 99.026 16.179 42 ~01 97-021 71,100 43 II~ 97-031 u 602 97.039 21~$2 195,?00 113,9S~ 202,~00 19S.700 926.1'/2 30,000 34,190 $$,~66 227,900 49.001 31,633 16,$19 AGENDA IT.EM No. JAN 2 8 1997 P~,. 7 I INCREASE 2 (DECREASE) 2 CAI~Y 4 FORWARD 5 BL'IX~£T OR INCR.EAS£ i~qCREASE 6 A~DME~ ~R~D ~ECREASE) (DECEASE) 7 F~D h~MBE~ ~SFERS ~CEI~ EX~DI~ ~CREASE INCKEAS£ IDECKEASEI (DECREASE) IN'rE RFt.'~D KESERVES TRA,~SFERS 9 I I $ 9"/~140 2'7.98: 25 I0 :168 97..042 2~.~ 2~,~ II 412 97~3 --JOI 12 I I I ~9 J4.8~ 14,l~ 13 49S ~S7 9.~2 9.M2 14 4~ ~7 ~.1~ ~.1~ IS 123 ~71 I~1 IJOI 17 I IS 97~76 19 212 ~11 1,162,1~ I 21 33~ 97~1] 824,40~ 47j94 ~ ~ ~ 122.419 I 23 ~31 97~ ~29J62 ISl,977 ~ 339 97~17 276.893 ~B,982 ~ 340 ~ll ~,6~8 J~,030 26 101 97~3 (4tjX) 41~ 27 21 29 (13.700) 20.09~5 679,2~4 ';~.01 I 10.419 3l?Jl~ S4,~I I BE IT FUrTHeR RESOLVED L~at the Cle~. b hereby ord~rd md dir~-I~d ~o ~ ~b R~ ~ ~fl ~l ~ ~h R~ ~ed aflff m~ ~d ~d maj~ ~e ft~I DA~ A~ST: ' BOA ~ OF C~ CO~SSIO~ D~GHT E. BR~K. CI~ COLLIER CO~. ~O~DA By: Timo~> L. Hancock. - 2 - AGENDA ITF. JVl, JAN 2 8 1997 pg. o~ Ob~aottves To have tho Board of Coun':· C:nnisstoners adopt an Ordinance a~end~ng o~d~na.~,c~ No. 89-11, t;'... ~ach and Water Safety and V&ssel Control Ordina:,te. COnli~t=&~lon: In 1989 the Board of ¢~u-~? Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 89-11, t~ ~aach and Kate.. .-f:ty and Ve~se! Control Ordinance. T~s Order&:.- ~va~ned ~h¢ ~ :~ ~erso~al watercrafC in adjoining wa=ers to a~. peach ]ocat%~.", ; ~ regulated concession operations by private vcr.~o~s a= all operat£cn from ~00' cff~!...'~ to 7~0'o~". tO bathers. All pe~c:,.~i watercraft ingtalled, quie:er than t'~e stock muffl, aach rantar of personal %'atercraf= wil. initial stipulations set f~:-%b in the si:es. Tho proposed u~rsonal watercraf= :hereby reducing risk ~ba]! have muffler£ c~rren:ly in use, a~d required tO read and *~ before each use. rfscal Im~act~ None Recommend~tlon: Staff :ecc~rendiD~ ' the Board of County Commissioners approv~ %' chang~ ~. ':'~h in the proposed Ordinanca. 6/ Ga,~{ Fra~6o, F=r~s Superlnte~:- Department of :;.r~s and Recrea.. :~ Department o[ :-arks and Date Reviewed T~omas W. Division cf r*: ":.' _.~?~erviceo 17774 t ! / ! $ ! I prehlbi=a the o~ privately c.~?~....~[ s~[i and, lndLvidual o~rate-n ~C private }e~ ~I~EA$, It i:; ~ecessary to a~t.,, · operation et pr:v.,'., and rascal ~e~ Co[l~er County ~tc" ';'iq, th,~t the c,; ;~, ba emended. Cc~:'.. · County Ordinance · :.'P. c'ot;!:TY° f~.'~:" Wor,!s ~J~orl{r,,::' - · .r,1.; t**ctd9 ' ~arees, te~ta! ~et akiu, · '~-~ce to bathers &tld ~artd ' - ~h~el/na ~o abate t~e · .~:a~le anfore~en~ .~;~.,nce o! irtemponsiblo · -= =he vicinity ~ .... :r:ct:on ~ine of SOO '.::~n of rental ~et akim, Ordinance Ilo. CO-;i. ac amended. Section S~ of ~::~or County Or~tr~-~ ~;o. IS-12 ~s hereby a~onded to ro~4 a~ ~ .... ~ ~d ehorsfro~: L~. ~ ~s ~e hereb~ · ;.~ : !~rceab]o re~d~ h~ner or no~ such ~r¢; :: designated by aS:: ...... ,,;e sign, buoy or .*'o.~e? than · nn ~ter'e edq~ ~cre or except (2) Sa:~.'r~ft. lnctudlng c~'',' tha~ 500 £eQ~ :.,~.L operate a ~e~. 0.<.,~: corridor ~' 'J} ~eceor, ,'." Kettles of the ,- : sp&s~ orcater or pro~cr~y oC &fly '.'e:.~,. corridors, 'Thc ;. '...:.; nte3e of the Gulf ~t,e -~cre nay be denlg~e." ~e being exclusively f:? ";auel u~e betvseh ~.. r~'..i d~ik daily: T>.oae areas of Ti~,~,:~.. '/andetbllt Deach and c'em Pane County Pa:'.r ~r.d such ot~er parks (4) Uc. ;;', launch o~ pease*r, r~.:.e~ed. No person ~]-.~.'~':'.3r::ea lau~¢hln9 .,: (5) w~'~: ~kiin~. ~1o ~ers~n'. :..~:3uaLn9 t~e (a-'.,~.~o ~2n~ to~e~ O~ ..'.' bc. hlr~fl I veneer) and the vessel operator(a) a'~ ' v. cto: ski closer than Sa,' (~,t ~rom ~he ad~e ~: t',< ~.each dir0ctly on the *.~, ~lndsurf~oard=, and ',;'.~r~te · sallcrat~ Verde vnder~!~ ~.c-~-~. are deletOd. JAN 2 8 1 97 PI,,*~ :£~ CNTY PI~;'.KSa.:~EC TEL :.:..i ". *' '~-1602 -', ,.',",'~? ]$:~0:1o.0I;. F'.C4 2 4 7 8 l ',t '7 :9 10 (7) {le.c'~:.-.rd ~rea.. lie per,on ;:.~L'- operate · ~ot. cr:r.e-J '~:~:eeJ et' eatlcra'.'t; ',~itl~ln on .rea vhiclm has ,... r. clearly marked by bt:aTt, el. some dt~: :r.,.,;:uhtng device for b-',t:::in.~, swimming or k'::ic:; t.". boon othor~JGo ro~::icLed by the County, [~r,;'/l'..." '.hR% thJa eubeectJcr r;h,:~ not app%y in the ¢.?,¢ of an emergency or :o n patrol or ~. Yeaae] e~¢.r.~ r..~t tO exceed roa~onet)%o ~pood under exieti,g condttlc,:,::. ~:n.'.hing contained Jr, thJG Ordinance shall be construed tu ,t.~:,-. 1,.... ur approve Lhe '.i', ~..,J of any ye~go1 or iailcraft in except :;' L*.;aL ~'h/ch is rea,ezra;tie and propel' 3JnJted to, the r;': :.',cc ~! rater nkier~, L:.'~,ote, fish.tmon, C. £xenptlor.:. T:,~ following si:all ,.-'.. ~r. eoptod fret. the previa!one of 5~,c:. :.' 5:>; of thin Ordinance: ';ho ;.:.":'.eno o£ this Ordlr. a,'.ca ~hal! not be cc~'..:'. :. :~ tn prohibit the c~ er.trico, racing or ~.,--; :. ;.:~,t,ly patrolle~ r;,::~tt*., ap, ed trial or ex:. :.".: (2) ~hc .-.....,;*orn of {,av £nfor,',...;:.t or re~cuo veaso]~ cz ,.'.': ;, .:~ operating unde£ ,..:":'~ChOy conditions ci, r.'-..:, vy. enptod vhllo c~'.~:::.~*,Inq official duties o: n;:.:-.'r.;l,q under o~.r0on¢7 (3) Co.,..-.,.':.':.':.' tiohing ve~ael~ :..',. o);o.~ptod vhllo ~.:.~', .::q ::eh nettin~ or.?:'~:lon~ provided the c~-.:.'.':' ~ are conducted I~: ~- ~-~fe and r.~r.,, ~.; tn accordance ~i'.h Section ~;lX (B), ~r,~-~ .~,,.'.sd not 'co exceed :'~'-~{onabli speed under ex;;. L j c'~JndJt*-onm. Undo% r,n circumstance., ho'~':'.-.. ~.'.al'- cot.~norclal t::;hin9 vo~ol, be o2:.::..:n ,,: greater than tale upeed vlthin five hun.'.."cr; .'set (500 feet) o,' ~I:CTIOT{ ~WO: Ar.,:r.:!;.:. :,:c :o Section Seven c~ Collier County O:,!l.,-.'-.Y .gu. 0g-IX0 aa Section Seven ~: CoLlier County Ordinance {[o, Ig-~x ia hereby a~anded to .-::aJ, aa The ,afety ,,al -,-!!are o~. the persona ~]~,mt reside nearby the County'e beach e:~,~- ..-.J cf tho public th~C ."ccreate on the beach end adjel,lng v.'aL'krs :aa;:~o nlCellar7 and -'y?;'opl'!ate the fei lo--lng regular lc:::; A. BeeCh Vur,.:~. Pt,~.~Jt ~iequlremen:. ,'dl~.' per.on engaged Jn tho rental, lee~lr.:.;. :;'.'-'].~ent for conslde;,-:iun, or o:hervise JAN 2 8 1997 Pg, ~'~', , _ _ providing t r~,n,,; '.. ~ron the County. nn~n~a~nod upon ~L ~horo~or as est.~.'. tho ~a~ouing ~;H' · he~q,:. tho v,, (5) Th~ ..; . Any ;,;.. ', thefts.. (51 ~.~ %.. : ,.'. ;'o,dor rere[t al,..:i l,uuu and bo ;:!ca,L pnyinci cuah ~::i,lic,sLl~ :aa ;G' Lbo Couct7 b7 : ..... lu~icn a~a '' .,:.~ted at a la~'~'~:,..'.~ location p:=,:lc uae. : /~.a office. , ,.~be t,oat viii, · ..:n:,j n~ con, it Jori /', ;':Ir*mant'~ kept ~t. ..: :t I,l~co In ~orvlc. u. .',, for public uue ;',"~: :S~uOd sha~l ·:{Lrod :c O.~.thi:', ,: ',,.'at'.,' occupa%ione! ..-o ~ffJce roilulr(:.' .;J.:l~,." Goatlon &oven or thlu Ordinan~u. : .. ~:"..~ ar) occ~.pa~.iun,~l .;ce.~{e, the al~plLeant provide p:'u:,; '-: .,,,/in3 a curcon*., ,,.~1 id Ua. ach Vendor's Per, i:. ~. Ueach '/,'~'':.: ?¢t'~'itteo/Vooael Uu~;' :'¢~,lallone ~1'~¢- '.'. ,'.n, or o~erntion of ,. ao',orJP, ecl [~.~) ....: t'~ ~ho provl~lo~ o~ ~.,c~on Seven o~ (36~ ....,r uf n~e except f~,l ~:i~]~,e chJJdr-n blt~vun t~'c'l'/,' ~I:~ and {IG) ycnr~ ,~f CU~ ~ho ~a7 operate ~O:,;: .~,.-:v~aor over the ~;~- :~ :'.'an:y-one {21) -4- ~ords Uq~erl[no~ a~Je~; ~ords e~ruck-c:,rou;h aro deleted. .i L,t..',_ e/Lo_el!ii, e ~ r.,. _CDf.-"r fro." ·" _ ' :;' ~._L:," ~,h~iLi_:.,' ... ;'.'L,; P. r 1 .'..' L,; .... ,;,:..te~. -na =",," · ..... '.'. In tho cvol,*. . · . '::'.-.:nnnce conIllctr, :if, ,,:l}' othor ordJ~mnc~ of Cola[,,;' ,,:a~y or other appl~c.'... :(, l~v, tho ~ore restrictive 'eh~ll ., :' .( any phraDo ,< ;-;:ti:m Of tho Ordinance Lo hcl~ ;::.': :: . ,~:. un~onmtltutl,,~.. : j,~. any court of diatinc: and.r;,..:,* ' "-' ' l'. ovi{;-~on a,stl au.':...'.'.'.;ll;..q at,a~] not tho vail,IS-: , .;., :u,a~:ninr/ ~us'.'.~ . Agenda JAN 28 I ~11o provl Git, p* Floridd. 'the u,,~t.:. . t:¥ ................. I'/~ put. y Clerl~ CNA t F.~tAN -G- · ." t,,..',; ~'ordG st"t'ucl,---~chr-~,,te.,h ere ~eleted. .o.~1 JAN 2 II 1!i97 RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT THE COLLIER COUNTY FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE TO REDUCE THE NUMBERS OF FALSE BURGLAR ALARMS IN UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY ~ To have the Board adopt a new False Alarm Ordinance. ~ The SherifFs Office is requesting that the Board adopt, for the first time, a "False Alarm Ordinance" intended to significantly reduce the number of wasteful responses by CCSO Deputies to false burglar alarms. During the past five (5) years, false burglar alarms in unincorporated Collier County have accounted for more then ninety-eight percent (98%) of dispatched Deputy Sheriffs' responses to burglar alarm calls. A substantial majority of false alarms should be preventable by means of responsible oversight by owners of the respective burglar alarm systems. Reduction in the numbers of false alarms should free CCSO Deputies for constructive responses to real emergencies rather than preventable false burglar alarms. Also, elimination of false alarms heightens officers' reactions and awareness in the expectation that a dispatched alarm call is more probably a "real" emergency and not just another time wasting false alarm. ~ Although administration of this Ordinance will, at least initially, consume considerable staff time, especially by the staff of the Clerk of Courts, the expected substantial reduction in false alarm responses by Deputy Sheriffs, along with the projected fine revenues, should result in a substantial net savings of wasted direct and indirect costs. Upon adoption of the proposed ordinance, the first false alarm at each premises will result in a written warning. Thereafter, fines will be imposed for more than one false alarm from the same premises within any 180 day period. Four ($4) dollars of each fine will be remitted to the Clerk of Courts as an administration fee; the remainder of each fine will be deposited into the fines and forfeitures fund. None. ~ Subject to input at the public hearing hereon, it is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners adopt this proposed False Alarm Ordinance to reduce the number of "False alarms" that are occurring within unincorporated Collier County. Prepared by: ~un~el ~ Approved by: ~~ o On Hunter, Sheriff llier County Date ! 2 4 $ ? ~0 11 12 14 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 2~ 30 32 ~4 37 4O 41 ORDINANCE NO. 97-___ TIlE COLLIER COUNTY FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING RESPONSIBILITY FOR SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMS AND FALSE ALARMS; REQUIRED RESPONSE; PROVIDING FOR WARNING OR CITATION OF FALSE AI,ARM VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING FOR FALSE ALARM REPORT FORMS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION; PROVIDING FOR FALSE ALARM FINES; EXCEPTIONS; PROVIDING ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTY PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN TIlE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WItEREAS, security alarm systems in unincorporated Collier County convey alarm signals to the Collier County Sheriff's Office to indicate an apparent forced entry into or from the secured premises; and WHEREAS, approximately nineW-eight percent (98%) of security alarm signals received by the Sheriffs Office are false alarms; and WHEREAS, persons who should be responsible to prevent false alarms from being emitted from their securit3,' alarm system often fail to assume their responsibilities to prevent false alarms, whereby thousands of unnecessary official [aw enforcement responses to such false alarms waste valuable time of law enforcement officers of the Collier Cot, nty Sheriff's Office; and WHEREAS, persons who do not voluntarily assume their responsibilities to prevent false alarms, will, through enforcement of this Ordinance, be subject to fees, fines and other possible penalties; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners finds that it is in the best interests of the citizens and residents of Collier County to adopt this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY TIlE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the following Ordinance is hereby adopted. SECTION ONE: This Ordinance is titled and should be cited as the "Collier County False Alarm Ordinance." AGEt,IQA 9 ~0 11 13 17 19 20 23 2~ 26 30 31 32 33 SECTION TWO: DEFINITIONS. As used herein, the following lerms shall have the specified meanings unless another meaning is clearly required by the context: ' Enforcement official means the Sheriff of Collier County, each Deputy Sheriff, and/or any authorized representative or designee of the Sheriff. False alarm means activation of a security alarm signal caused by something other than an actual or attempted forced or unauthorized entry into or forced or unauthorized exit from the secured premises, and which signal results in a law enforcement response. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a security alarm signal is a false alarm whenever an enforcement officer responds to an alarm signal and the responding officer determines that the alarm signal was triggered by (a) a cause other than an attempted or actual forced or unauthorized entry into or forced or unauthorized exit from the secured premises, or (b) by intentional activation of that alarm signal based upon a good faith, reasonable mistake that a crime was being committed at the secured premises. Official resr~onse means whe:~ any enforcement officer responds by traveling to a secured premises in response to a security alarm signal from that premises. Owner means owner of the secured premises, including each co-owner of co-owned property, including, and not limited to, each tenant by the entireties, each joint tenant, and each tenant in common. Premises means any residence, any building or structure, and any apartment, office, condominium, or any other unit thereof. Responsible party means (a) each owner, (b) each 18 years or older occupant of the secured premises, and (c) each tenant and each subtenant, and (d) other persons or entities, if any, that have by written agreement with the owner agreed to be responsible for false alarms emitted from that secured premises. Secured Premises means the premises intended to be protected by the security alarm system. Security alarm malfunction means emission of any alarm signal caused by mechanical failure, improper system design, equipment malfunction, improper maintenance or lack of maintenance, power failure or power JA, 2 u ,.--'.: 2 1 2 $ I0 12 14 19 2O 24 2~ 26 27 ~0 31 33 34 substantially similar cause. Malfunctions do not include any accidental activation of thc alarm signal by an action that thc syslcm was designed to bc triggered by. Security alarm system means any alarm dc'.;icc that is used to emit a signal to alert persons of an attempted or actual forced entry into or forced or Gnauthorized exit from the secured premises, and which system emits a signal (electrical impulse and/or tone) to prompt an official response from any Collier County enforcement officer. Excluded arc (I) alarm devices that emit alarm signals because of unauthorized acts to a vehicle, and (2) systems installed by a telephone company to protect only thc company's telephone equipment. Signal means a power impulse or audible tone emitted from a security alarm system which indicates that a true or false alarm has occurred. Vacant means premises that arc not physically occupied by any responsible adult at any time during an official response by an enforcement officer. SECTION THREE: RESPONSIBILITY FOR SECURITY ALARM SVSTEMS AND FALSE ALARMS; REQUIRED RESPONSE. (a) Responsibili .ty for Sccuri .ty Alarm Systems. Neither thc County, nor the Sheriffs Office, nor any member of either shall have or assume any responsibility for the installation, repair, maintenance, operation, or effectiveness of any security alarm system not then owned by Collier County. Responsibilities for false alarms emitted by the respective security alarm system rest solely, jointly and severally, with each responsible party. Each active security alarm system in unincorporated Collier County must always have at least one (1) responsible party. No person or entity shall maintain any security alarm system that automatically dials thc statcwidc emergency telephone number (currently "911"), or any other telephone number assigned to thc Shcrift's Office except as then required by federal law, state law, or county ordinance. (b) gesponsibility For False Alarms. Each owner of thc secured premises is primarily responsible under this Ordinance for false alarms at thc secured premises. Owners may by lease or other written agreement assign that primary responsibility to persons or entities that occupy thc secured premises, or to managers of thc secured premises; however, failure of any such non-o,,mcr to fully comply with any warning or citation under this Ordinance shall owner responsible for such false alarms and thc resulting penaltics~ Eal:ha.l.0(?.~C~ 5 9 10 12 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 36 responsible party is jointly ~,nd severally responsible under this Ordinance for all false alarms at the respective secured premises. (c) ~ When responding to an =farm at a vacant secured premises, the responding officer should attempt to contact a ~'esponsible party. If within ten (10) minutes of arrival at the secured premises the alarm signal is not terminated, that alarm may be terminated by the County. SECTION 'FOUR: WARNING OR CITATION OF FALSE ALAIBI VIOLATIONS. (a) First False Alarm. A written warning shall be issued for the first false alarm at that secured premises which occurs after the effective date of this Ordinance. The warning may be left at the secured premises or otherwise delivered to a responsible party. The warning may be left at a conspicuous place within a vacant secured premises, or may be left with any adult occupant, employee, or agent of an occupant of an occupied secured premise. Alternatively, the warning may be mailed to any responsible par~ by regular United States mail, but if returned undelivered, then mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by actual service by any other lawful service of process. (b). Second and Subsequent False Alarms. An enforcement official may issue a citation of a false alarm violation of this Ordinance for the second or any other subsequent false alarm that occurs at that secured premises within ! 80 days of the last false alarm at that premises. The citation may be served upon any responsible party by any lawful service of process. SECTION FIVE: FALSE ALAI~I REPORT FORM - CORRECTIVE ACTION. (a) Securi .ty Alarm Report Form. In each instance where a security alarm is determined by warning or citation of violation from an enforcement official to be a false alarm, a responsible party must promptly file with the Collier County Sheriff's Office a completed "Security Alarm Report Form." That form must be completed with true and correct information and be returned to the SherifF's Office within twenty (20) days of the date of that false alarm. (b) Each report form, when completed, must include information: the ¢ S 9 ~0 ~2 ~4 ].9 20 2! 22 23 21 28 29 30 3[ 32 33 (I) Thc full name(s), address, home and/or work telephone number of at least one (l) responsible individu, al regarding the sccuri~ alarm system at that sccurcd premises. (2) The name, address and telephone number of at least one (1) authorized individual representative of a responsible party who can bc immcdiatcly notificd in the event of a subsequent false alarm at that prcmiscs. (3) If applicable, the name and 24-hour telephone number of the business or entity that will be monitoring that alarm system. (4) The exact cause of the alarm, if known. If the cause of the alarm is not known, specify in dc{ail the suspected cause of the alarm. If applicable, include all information that indicates the alarm was not a false alarm. (5) Describe all corrcctivc action that was taken to eliminate that cause of that false alarm from rccurring. (6) Other information that may assist the SheritTs Office in the event ora subsequent fa]se alarm from that alarm system. (c) Corrective Action. Unless it is obvious that the alarm was lriggered by a cause other than a system malfunction, the system should be examined by an alarm technician or another pcrson who is knowlcdgcablc regarding causes of security alarm system malfunctions for that type of system, whereby a good faith attempt is made to prevent that type of false alarm from reoccurring. (d) Failure to Promptly Deliver False Alarm Report Form - Fine. Each failure to have the completed False Alarm Report Form delivered to the Sheriff's Office by the date due shall subject the responsible party to a civil fine of $25.00. These late reporting fines are in addition to fines for false alarms. (c) S~epar:ate Report for Each False Alarm. Each false alarm more than twenty-four (24) hours apart from a prior false alarm where there was an official enforcement officer's response shall require the filing of a separate "Security Alarm Report Form." SECTION SIX: FALSE ALARM FINES; EXCEPTIONS. (a) False Alarm Fines. A written warning (for the first false alarm) does not require payment of a fine. Airier a citation for a second or subsequent false alarm violation is issued, a r~sponsible party shall, within thirty (30) days of the 2 3 4 6 10 ~.1 12 13 14 2O 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 32 33 34 35 36 date of that alarm, pay to the Clerk of the Courts a false alarm civil follows: FALSE ALARM FINE SCHEDULE Number of False Alarms Within a I$0 Day Period False Alarm Fine Per False Alarm: First Response .................... Must File Report; no false alarm fine. Second Response ............... File Report plus $75.00 fine. Third Response .................. File Report plus $75.00 fine. Fourth Response ............... File Report plus $75.00 fine. Five or more Responses: .... File Report; mandatory court appearance and fine of not less than S l00.O0 nor more than $300.00. fine as (b) Exceptions: (I) 180 Days Without a False Alarm. lfone hundred eighty (180) days pass without a false alarm from the respective alarm system, a "clean slate" status shall be automatically granted to that system if each Report has been filed and ali false alarm fines arising out of every prior false alarm Cot that system have been paid. The first false alarm after "clean slate' s:atus shall require only a v.'ritten warning and shall commence a new I $0 day time period for subsequent false alarms from that alarm system. (2) New Alarm System Installed. Installation of an entirely new security alarm system at the secured premises, upon written notice of same to the Sheriff's Office and all prior false' alarm fines are paid, shall be classified as a new system and shall be treated as an alarm system that had no prior false alarm(s) - 'clean slate" status. (3) Good Faith Mistake of Crime Being Committed. No person shall violate this Ordinance by intentionally setting off a security alarm signal to prompt an official response if that was alarm set off based upon a reasonable mistake of fact that a crime was then being committed at the secured premises. Thc responding enforcement official will determine whether there was a reasonable mistake of fact to justify that intentional If excused, that alarm shall not be counted activation of that alarm signal. as a false alarm. 1 2 4 6 7 10 :9 21 22 24 2~ 26 27 29 30 SECTION SEVEN: ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTY PROVISIONS. (a) ' ' . ..C.o. umy .Co,1 ~ In addition to all enforcement provisions spc..ified i~ this Ordinance, and as provided for in Section 125.69, Florida Stat,res, a~¥ neT~on who shall ~,iolate any provision of this Ordinance shall, at thc elccti',o o~' the Coanty, be subject to the enforcement provisions of Section I-6 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, excluding possible imprisonment, exceot for contempt of court. Violations of this Ordinance may be referred by tl',e Sheriff to the Code Enforcement Board for enforcement pursuant to Chapte[ 162, Florida Stamles, including filing liens against the secured premises. (b) ' --' · s_alld. Y_ipes. All fees and/or fines charged under this Ordinance shall be an obligation o, vcd jointly and severally by each responsible par~y. Fees and fines shall be 7.~id m fhe Clerk of Court within the time periods specified in this Ordinance except as may be ordered otherwise by a trial judge. Prompt payment of each false alarm fir~.,, ~l~all clear and settle that false alarm violation, but shall not affect the duty to file the respective False Alarm Report Form. (c) ~ Fines and custs imposed against a responsible party are to be distributed as follows: Four d311ars (~,4.00) to the Clerk of the Courts as an administration fee, and the balance of' th:. funds of each fine is to be deposited in the fine and forfeitures fund of the Sheriffs Office to off- set the Sheriff's operating budget costs. SECTION EIGHT: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In thc event that this Ordinance conflicts with any ether ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, thc more restrictive shall eTvly l~f any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutiona~ by ar~y court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect thc validity of the remaining portion. JA;.I 2 ¢ ';:!:.7 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2*7 20 29 3O 32 33 34 36 SECTION NINE: INCLUSION IN TIlE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. Thc provisions of this Ordinance shall become and bc made a part of thc Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. Thc sections of this Ordinance may be rcnumbercd or rclcttcrcd to accomplish such, and thc word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION TEN: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with thc Florida Department of State, but shall not be enforced until 6:00 A.M. on the of ,1997. day PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ~ day of ~, 1997. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By:, Deputy Clerk By: TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney h ',m'd m a K eJ',J'a I sea l Jl.m.t T C P /Twt) RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve Petition SNR.-96o 10. PKEPARED BY: Customer Service Agent Supervisor REVIEWED B3~.. ' Building Review and Permitting .APP.R~D BY: ~ Vincefit, X. Cautero, Administrator Community Development and Environmental Services Date Date Date AGENDA ITEM gAN 2 8 1997 1 2 3 4 5 6 ? 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 RESOLUTION NO. 96- RESO:UTIO~ RENAHING RIFLE RANGE ROAD TO "THE LORD'S WAY#, WHICH STR£ET IS LOCATEL EAST OF C.R. 951, IH SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHER£AS, the Board of County Commissioners is authorized pursuant to authority of Chapter 336.05, Florida Statutes, to name or rename streets and reads, except for certain state roads; and WHE~A::, c~e Board of County Commissioners has been requested to confirm the renaming of Rifle Range Road to The Lord's ~ay. This street ~s located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Colli~ Count~, Florida, as described as EXHIBIT WHEREAS. there appears to be no street in Collier County with this name or a~ ~imilar sounding name; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for ~dentification purposes to confirm the na~e of this street, NOW TH£REFORE, BE IT RESOLV£O BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY CO~I$SIONERS OF COLICS,. ?~TY, Th~ aame of ~is s~ree= is hereby changed from Rifle Range Road to The Lord's Way and ~s conf~ed as same. BE ~T F~THER RESOLVED tha~ ~his Resolution ~ recorded in the ~bl~c Ra=ords of Collier Court=y, Florida, and no~ed upon the s~ree= and zoning a~lases of Collier County, and notations ~ade on the re~ereDced Pla~. Co~tssioner offered ~he forgoing r~solu~lon and moved ~ adoption, seconded by Commissioner and upon roll call ~he vo~e was= PAGE AGE T£ JAN g 8 1997 P~., ~ ! 2 3 4 $ 6 ? 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Done th~e ~day of ~, 1996, AYES= NAYS= ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: ABSTENTION: ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY CO~ISSIONERS COLLIER COU~JTY, FLORIDA DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BY: JOHN C. NORRIS, CHAXP.~AN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: HARJORIE H. STUDENT ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY SNR-96-10 RESOLUTION/18593 PAGE 2 JAN 8 1997 ~JAN ~ 8 1997 '"7 I - UAN ,~ 8 1667 EXECUTIVE SUMMARy RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE FOR RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT OF "NORTHSHORE LAKE VILLAS REPLAT"v AND APPROVE THE VACATION OF THE RECORDED PLAT OF "NORTHSHORE LAKE VILLAS"v PETITION AV-96-03~ To approve for recording the final plat of "Northshore Lake Villas Replat" and approve the vacation of the recorded plat of "Northshore Lake Villas", Petition AV-96-036. CONSIDERATIONS~ The Board of County Commissioners approved for recording the final plat of "Northshore Lake Villas" on August 13, 1996. Due to a revision of the Right-of-Way alignment, the replat was necessitated. FISCAL IMP~CTt The fiscal impact to the County is none. The project cost is $415,314.19 to be borne by the developer. The security amount, equal to 100% of the cost to complete the remaining improvements and 10% of the total cost of the project, is $457,600.00. The existing Construction and Maintenance Agreement and letter of Credit for "Northshore Lake Villas" will serve as the security for "Northshore Lake Villas Replat". The County will realize revenues as follows: Fund: 113 Agency: County Manager Cost Center: 138900 - Development Services Revenue generated by this project: Total: $8,072.72 Fees are based on a construction estimate of $415,314.19 and were paid in May 1996, and are reflected in the Executive Summary of August 13, 1996. AGENDA IT, EM , JAN 8 1997 Executive Summary Northshore Lake Villas Replat Page 2 ~ROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP~CT~ None RECOHMEND~TION~ That the Board of County Commissioners approve the final plat of "Northshore Lake Villas Replat", and approve Petition AV-96-036 with the following stipulations= Accept the posted letter of credit as security to guarantee completion of the Subdivision improvements. 2) Authorize the recording of the final plat of "Northshore Lake Villas Replat". 3) Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Resolution. 4) That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the required improvements have received preliminary acceptance. PREPARED BY: John R. HouldSwOrth, Senior Engineer Engineering Review Date REVIEWED BY: Thomas E. Kuck, P.E. Engineering Review Manager , Donald W. Arnold~ - Vincent A. Cautero, Administrator Community Development & Environmental Services Community Dev. and Environmental Svcs. DIVISION JR~:ew Date Date Date AGENDA, ITeM JAN '21, 2'0' ~A~sc £s cAs~,"' coZr, rCR cou~ ' PROSECT ., . ~ATION AG~N No JAN ~ 1997 PErITI'ON TO VACATE. ABANDON'. DYSCONTINUE. OR CLOSE __ Public Street __ Dcdlcatcd £ascmcut .--. Alleyway --- Utility ~ Subdi~iou Plat __ Dra]aagc Date Received: Pet;dooer. Gulfshore Lake Villas, Inc. Gene Thrusl'man, President Add~ess: 2063 Trade Center Way City/Sure: Naples, Florida 34109 Tclepbo.c:. (941) 514-0514 Agent: Blair A. Fol~ Addtuss: 3106 South Horseshoe Drive Telephone: 643-2~1:~4 City/State: Naples, Florida · 34104 Ad.ess of Subject Pro~w. 626 Capt'n Kate Court City/State: Naples, Florida Location: Sect;on 21 Township 48S Range 25E Legal Desc~ption: See attached Exhibit "A" Plat Book: 27 Page (0:33-34 Re.on for Request: Revise location of 1~'-.=. maintenance easement to coincide existing lake location. CEC will file replat of subdivision to show sudq Current Zoning: PUD Do~s ~ affect de:sky? 'No I Hereby Authorize Agent Above: to Represent, b~ for t~ Pet;t/on: Bat: (=) (3) (4) (9 Please sec 'Pollcy and Procedures of Vacation and Azmulmcnt: for the ~t of $uppor6ve matcHal~ wl~ch mttst accompany ~ petit;on, and dcllver or ma~l to: Transportation 5er~-~ DMsion CoU]er Cottaty Government Complex Naples, FL 34112 Telephone: (941) 774-8'160 If applicant is a land trust, so ~dicate and name beneficiaries. If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers sad major stockholders. If applicant is a partnership, limited partnerxblp or other bu,;~t.ss entity, so indicate and name pr~dpais. If appticant is an ovmcr, indicate cxacdy u recorded, and l~t afl o~cr o~mcrs, If applicant is a lessee, attach a copy of lease, a~d indicate actu~ owners ~ not · .............. : ........... : MetroScan/Coll Owner : ILARIA JEAN CoOuner : Site :532 ROMA. CT NAPLES 33963 Mail =532 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963 :06/25/91 Doc ,:1626-1316 :$218,000 Deed : Lo~Amt: Doan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE F~MILY RESIDENCE Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT i OR 1627 PG :256 : Sub/Plat :VANDERBILT VILL~S Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 ,. . ........ : MetroScan/Collier Owner :WEST J~MES J & RUBY L CoOWner : Site :538 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 Mail :538 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :10/23/91 Doc #:1657-0953 Price : $194,000 Deed : Loan Amt: Loan : VestTy~e: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:O001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 2 OR 1657 PG :953 : iPlat:VANDERBILT VILLAS Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:485 Folio $:79795000061 Strap $:153250 Land :$6],473 Struct :$133,700 Agric : Total :$197,173 %Imprvd:68 % Owned: Exempt :HOHESTE~D Amount :$25,000 Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$2,910.17 -- Phone -- OWller =941-591-8227 Tenant : 13A21 [J:;2,543 : Folio $:79795000087 Strap $:153250 Land :$57,000 Strict :$107,709 Agric : Total :$164,709 %Imprvd:65 % Owned: Exempt :HOMESTEAD Amount :$25,000 Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$2,062.02 -- Phone -- Owner :941-591-8973 Tenant : 23A21 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is No' ........ - ..... : Met wrier =CUDDIE STEVEN & NANCY :oO~neT : :ire :S44 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 :ail :18 HILL COUNTRY DR STOUFFVILLE :feted : 11/13/90 Doc [: 1571-2087 ~rlce :$242,000 Deed : ~oan Amt: Loan : .. ~estType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:O001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT '3 OR 1571 PG :2087 : ~ub/Plat: VANDERBILT VILLAS :ensus :Tract 101.00 Block 3 .~:25E T:48S S:21 er : Folio f:79795000100 Strap [:153250 ..... '~:Land :$57,000 CANADA Struct :$117,009 Agric : Total :$174,009 %Imprvd:67 % Owned: Exempt : Amount : Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$2,568.26 -- Phone -- Owner Tenant : 33A21 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~ ........ : MetroScan/Collier : :SUTKOWSKI STEVE & MARY C Folio ~:79795000126 Strap f:153250 Land :$57,000 Struct : Agric : Total :$57,000 %Imprvd: % Owned:100 Exempt : Amount : Millage:14.7594 1995 TX:$841.29 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : 43A21 CoOwner : 5ire :556 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 Mail :556 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :05/23/94 Doc %:1949-2068 Price :$76,000 Deed :WARRANTY Loan A mt: Loan : VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 4 OR 1949 PG :2068 : 5ub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 .......... Lot Acres:.24 ' 10,454 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not .----~. ..... ; ;- - ~. "--... ~-."..-'--j' , . . ,---:,..'.~.~"".' . NO. SUeO2Y~S~ON S. TA~B]n.T ~ d. S. P.E. PG. tS S-4 P.l. PG. Owner :SUTKOWSKI SR STEPHEN J CoOwner :~'~Y ¢ SUTKOWSKI Site ~':566 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 Ma£1 :14 GRANDVIEW DR HUGHESTOWN PA 18640 Xferea :05/22/92 Doc ~:1718-0245 Price :$253,000 Deed : Loan A mt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 5 OR 1718 PG :245 : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 , ........ : MetroScan/Collier Owner :LA GRASTA NICOLO & IDA CoOWner : Site :562 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 Mail :860 CASSENA RD NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :06/25/90 Doc ~:1539-0984 ' Price : Deed : Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:O000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 6 OR 1539 PG :984 : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 .......... Lot Acres:.24 10,454 Folio l:79795000142 Strap ~:153250 Land :$57,000 Struct :$115,296 Agric : Total :$172,296 %Imprvd:67 % Owned: Exempt : Anount : Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$2,542.97 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : 53A21 Folio ~:79795000168 Strap ~:153250 Land :$57,000 Struct : Agric : Total :$57,000 %Imprvd: % Owned: Exempt : Amount : Millage:14.7594 1995 TX:$841.29 -- Phone -- Owner :941-597-5886 Tenant : 63A21 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not *.oOvneT : :ire :568 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 :ail :380 FLAMINGO AVE NAPLES FL 33963 :feted : 06/25/90 Doc #: 1539-0983 )r~ : Deed : m~tmt: Loan : ~e ~Type: IntTy: ~ender ~and Use:0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL ~egal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 7 OR 1539 PG :983 : ;ub/Plat :VANDERBILT VILLAS =ensus :Tract 101.00 Block 3 ~:25E T:4t~s S:21 : MetroScan/Collier 3wrier :FRONGILLO ROBERT A/ROSE :oOwner : ~ite :574 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 .Hail :1~ LOCUST AVE WORCESTER KA 01604 Xfered :04/03/96 Doc 1:2166-0109 Price : ~ .]0,000 Deed :WARRANTY Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: MARRIED PERSONS IntTy: Lender : Land Use: 0¢ 00 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL Legal :V?~DERBILT VILLAS LOT 8 OR 1539 PG '1at: VANDERBILT VILLAS :'~ract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:~SS S:21 Folio t :79795000184 Strap t :153250 Land :$57,000 struct : Agric : Total : $57,000 %Imprvd: % Owned: Exempt : Amount : Hillage: 14.7594 1995 Tx:$841.29 -- Phone -- Owner :941-597-4168 Tenant : 73A21 Folio t:79795000207 Strap t:153250 83A21 Land :$57,000 Struct : Agric : Total :$57,000 %Imprvd: % Owned:100 Exempt : Amount : Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$841.29 -- Phone -- O~er Tenant : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Gu aranK~R~a ITEM Owner :FELDMAN SIDNEY & DOLORES G CoOwner : site :580 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 ~ail :580 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :04/04/90 Doc J:1517-1606 Price :$68,900 Deed : Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:O001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 9 OR 1517 PG :1606 : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 Folio ~:79795000223 Strap ~:153250 Land :$57,000 Struct :$111,021 Agric : Total :$168,021 %Imprvd:66 % Owned: Exempt :HOMESTEAD Amount :$25,000 Hillage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$2,110.92 -- Phone -- Owner :941-591-4207 Tenant : * : MetroScan/Collier Owner :GLEESON TERENCE M/MARGARET C LANGAN CoOwner : Site :586 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 Mail :586 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :02/28/96 Doc #:2152-2284 Price :$100 Deed :WARRANTY Loan A mt: Loan : VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 10 OR 1479 PG :298 : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 Folio #:79795000249 Strap #:153250 Land :$64,125 Struct :$120,991 Agric : Total :$185,116 %Imprvd:65 % Owned:100 Exempt : ~mount : Millage:14.7594 1995 TX:$2,363.23 -- Phone -- Owner :941-591-3932 Tenant : 93A21 103A21 The Information Provided is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not JAN 2 8 1997 ........ = Me~roscan/collier Owner :LA GRASTA MAURO & ANNA ET AL CoOwner : NICOLO Site :*NO SITE ADDRESS* Hail :496 FLAMINGO AVE NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered : Doc it: : Deed : Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS PARCEL A : : Sub/Plat :VANDERBILT VILLAS Census : Tract Block R:25E T:48S S:21 , ....... : ~letroScan/Collier Owner :HUNT HARLEY L & MARLENE H CoOwner : Site :589 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 Mail :589 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :10/24/94 Doc t:1996-1013 Price :$275,000 Deed :WARRANTY Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: F~tRRIED PERSONS IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 11 O.R 1996 PG :1013 : ,Plat: VANDERBI LT VILLAS ~sus :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 o : Lot Acres:.29 12,632 Folio J :79795000029 Strap J:153250 Land :$209 Struct : Agric : Total : $209 %Imprvd: % Owned: Exempt : Amount : Millage: 14 · 7594 1995 Tx:S3.07 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : Folio t:79795000265 Strap t:153250 Land :$66,150 Struct :$127,115 Agric : Total :$193,265 %Imprvd:66 % Owned:100 Exempt :HOMESTEAD Amount :$25,000 Millage:14.7594 1995 TX:$2,483.49 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : A3A21 113A21 f The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not · JAN 2 8 1997 , .................. : ]4etroScan/¢o£11er Owner :STUART III JOHN & CAROL W CoOwner : Site :583 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 Mail :583 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :01/30/90 Doc ~: 1501-1540 Price :$72,000 Deed : Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 12 OR 1501 PG :1540 : Sub/Plat :VANDERBILT VILLAS Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 ,. : MetroScan/Collier Owner :LA GRASTA NICOLO & IDA CoOwner : Site :577 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 Mail :860 CASSENA RD NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :06/25/90 Doc ~: 1539-0984 Price : Deed : Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use: 0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 13 OR 1539 PG :984 : Sub/Plat :VANDERBILT VILLAS Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 26 11,325 Folio ~:79795000281 Strap ~:153250 123A21 Land :$58,800 Struct :$154,397 Agric : Total :$213,197 %Imprvd:72 % Owned: Exempt : Amount : Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$3,146.66 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : Folio #:79795000304 Strap 9:153250 Land :$58,800 Struct : Agric : Total :$58,800 %Imprvd: % Owned: Exempt : Amount : Millage:14.7594 1995 TX:$867.85 -- Phone -- O-~ner :941-597-5886 Tenant : 133A21 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not G . fler. ro:~carl/t.:o J. J. ~f .... .- ..................... Ovner :LA GRASTA NICOLO & IDA CoOvner : Site :571 ROHA CT NAPLES 33963 }(ail :860 CASSENA RD NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered = 06/26/90 Doc ~ = 1539-0984 ce : Deed : VestType: IntT~: Land Use:0000 %,ACANT~td~S~D£NTXAL :984 : R:2~E T:489 S:21 ~__. - .... : ~etroScan/¢ollier CoOwner : Site :565 ROHA CT NAPLES 33963 Mail :565 ROm CT NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :01/10/91 Doc ~: 1585-0089 Price : $?0,000 Deed : Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Legal :VANDERBILT VI~LAS LOT 15 OR 1585 PG :89 )1at: VANDERBILT V'CLLAS sus =Tract 101.0c Block 3 R:25E T:485 .f:21 Folio t :79795000320 Strap I: 153250 143A21 "~ ' Lanc~ :$57,000 struct : ~ric : Total : $57, ~0~ ~ ~e~: Zxe~t : ~o~nt : 1995 Tx:~841.29 -- Phone -- O'~er = 941-597-5886 Tenant = Folio ~:79795000346 Strap t:153250 153A21 Land :$57,000 Struct :$123,984 Agric : Total =$180,984 %Imp~d:69 % Owned: Exempt :HOHESTE~D Anount :$25,000 H!ilage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$2,302.22 -- Phone -- G~er : Tenant : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Gt JAN 8 199' Owner =LA GRASTA ]~AURO & ANNA CoOwner : Site :559 ROKA CT NAPLE~ 33963 Hail :380 FLAMINGO AVE NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :06/25/90 Doc #:1539-0983 Price Loan Amt: Loan : VestTyp ·: IntTy .' Lender : Land Use:0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL Legal =VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 16 OR 1539 PG =983 Sub/Plat: VANDERBILT VILLAS Census · :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 , ........ : MetroScan/Collier Owner :RENDINO STEPHEN & TINA CoOwner *- · Site :553 ROHA CT NAPLES 33963 ~ail :203 N HIGHLAND DR PITTSTON PA 1864O Xfered *.05/17/91 Doc #:1616-15~8 . Price *.$235,000 Deed Loan Ant: Loan ; VestType: IntTy: Lender · Land Use:0001 RES,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 17 OR 1616 PG *.1588 Sub/Plat :VANDERBILT VILLAS : Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 Folio #:79795000362 Strap ~:153250 Land :$57,000 Struct *. A~ric Total :$57,000 %Impr~rd: % Owned: Exempt : Amount : H~llage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$841.29 -- Phone -- O~ner :941-597-4168 Tenant : 163A21 Folio #:79795000388 Strap ~:153250 Land :$57,000 Struct :$115,857 Agric Total :$172,857 %Imprvd*.67 % Owned*. Exempt : Amount : Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx=$2,551.27 -- Phone -- O-aner :717-655-6396 Tenant : 173A21 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not . ........ . ....... : ~etroScan/Collier Owner :LA GRASTA NICOLO & IDA CoOwner : '' Site :547 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 Mail :860 CASSENA RD NAPLES FL 33963 =06/25/90 Doc ~:1539-0984 Xp~d = Deed: L~ Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 18 OR 1539 PG :984 : Sub/Plat :VANDERBILT ~;ILLAS Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S=21 .......... Lot Acres: .24 10,454 . ....... : MetroScan/Collter Owner :LA GRASTA MAURO & ANNA CoOwner : Site :541 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 Mail :380 FLAMINGO AVE NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered : 06/25/90 Doc ~: 1539-0983 Price : Deed : Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL L~gal :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 19 OR 1539 PG :983 : /Plat :VANDERBILT VILLAS Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 :mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~mm~ Folio #:79795000401 · . Strap ~:153250 183A21 Land =$57,000 Struct : Agri¢ : Total %Imprvd: % Owned: Exempt = Amount : Mlllage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$841.29 -- Phone -- Ovner :941-597-5886 Tenant : ,mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~ Folto ~:79795000427 Strap ~:153250 Land :$57,000 Struct : Agric Total :$57,000 %Imprvd: % Owned: Exempt : )mount : Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$841.29 -- Phone -- ~ner :941-597-4168 Tenant : 193A21 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not · JAN 8 1997 .. :LA GRASTA NICOLO & IDA :b~5 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 :860 CASSENA RD NAPLES FL 33963 :c~6/25/90 Doc ~:1539-0984 : Deed : : Loan : : IntTy: : 0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL :V.~NDERBILT VILLAS LOT 20 OR 1539 PG ;984 : :VANDERBILT VILLAS :Tract 101.00 Block 3 485 S:21 Folio ~:79795000443 Strap ~/: 153250 Land :$57,000 Struct : Agri¢ : Total : $57,000 %Imprvd: % Owned: Exempt : Amount : Millage: 14.7594 1995 Tx: $841.29 -- Phone -- Owner :941-597-5886 Tenant : ',." :', "cs: .24 10,454 * ..... : MetroScan/Collier Owner :GARCIA MARIA C RODRIGUEZ CcC'.:~/ek- : S.i-..-. :529 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 M;..'.i :529 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963 X f :. re¢~. :09/01/95 Doc #:2095-1304 ~" . -~: :~237,000 Deed :TRUSTEES _.c~_.. A,,%: Loan : '.L. :-~':'¥:..e:~.UtRRIED PERSONS IntTy: *'-~.-;:~ U,',~: 0001 RES, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ~'.' ::~.~ :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 21 ? ,.,: ~: I ,,t: VANDERBILT VILLAS ce~._-'u~. :Tract 101.00 Block 3 . R ~ L '5'.,-' :4;~S S:21 203A21 Folio #:79795000469 Strap #:153250 Land :$64,395 Struct :$133,883 Agrtc : Total :$198,278 %Imprvd:68 % Owned:100 Exempt : Amount : Hillage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$2,557.49 -- Phone -- O-~ner : Tenant : 213A21 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not - _. ........- ..:.. ....... ....................... :_ .................. .. j JAN P, 8 1997 ......... I ........ , : MetroScan/Collier O~,n~r :LA GRASTA MAURO & ANNA ET AL c.:~..:nez : ~ICOLO $i~ ~519 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 }Jail :496 FLAMINGO AVE NAPLES FL 33963 L, ~, · Deed : Ve ~tT.ype ~ IntTy: Le::d~r La~.~ Us~:: 0000 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL Le~a]. :VANDERBILT VILLAS LOT 22 LESS PH 1 :VANDERBILT VILLAS CONDO AS DESC IN ~OR 1437 PG12S, LESSPOOL DESC IN ... · Su~. Plut:VANDERBILT VILLAS Ce~:_~us ~Traot 101.00 Block 3 L. ~ : ..... : MetroScan/Collier O...:::zl' :VANDERBILT VILLAS CONDO ASSOC CcOwD~ 1' : Site :509 ROMA CT NAPLES 33963 ' 'M::L! :532 ROMA CT NAPLES FL 33963 · ~farec~- :04/01/92 Doc ~:1701-0079 ~rlc¢ :$1,000 Deed : · Lcal~ A~,t: Loan : Ve3tT~.pe: IntTy: L<-::dE.: La::d ~,.:e: 0035 REC,TOURIST ATTRACTION,EXHIBIT : ~.:.,.a5 :WANDERBILT VILLAS THAT PORTIONOF :LOT 22 DESC IN OR 1701 PG 81 A/K/A :POOL & BLDG u'.:/! !~:~ ~ VANDERBILT VILLAS !.:s~,.-' :Tract 101.00 Block 3 · R:i'9;* ?:48S S:21 Folio 1:797950004~ Strap #:1532S0 223A2~ Land :$247,000 Struct : Agric : Total :$247,000 %Imprvd: % Owned: Exempt : Amount : Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$3,645.57 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : Folio ~:79795000~4 Strap I:153250 22.23A21 Land :$200 struct :$5o Agri¢ : Total :$250 %Imprvd:20 % Owned: Exempt : Amount : Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$3.68 -- Phone -- o-~'ner : Tenant :941-592-7823 The information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not JAN 8 1997 Owner :RINALDI CARL J & JEAN C CoOwner : Site :509 ROMA CT ~101 NAPLES 33963 Hail :509 ROMA CT #101 NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :06/29/90 Doc ~: 1541-0169 Price :$102,500 Deed : Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : ~and Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO)~,101OR 1 :1541 PG 169 Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) .ensus :Tract 101.00 Block 3 :25E T:4..8S S:21 Folio #:79807500022 Strap ~:153254 1013A21 Land · : Struct :$76,500 Agric Total :$76,500 %Imprvd:100 % Owned: Exempt :HOHESTEAD Amount :$25,000 Hillage:14.7594 1995 TX:$760.12 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : LOt Acres: "* ............ : MetroScan/Collier ..Dwner :R~SMAN STANLEY & EDYTHE J CoOwner : Site :509 ROMA CT ~102 NAPLES 33963 ~ail :509 ROMA CT ~102 NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :11/19/91 Doc ~:1664-0768 Price :$82,000 Deed : .Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #102OR :1664 PG 768 : _~ub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ensus :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot .......... Folio #:79807500048 1023A21 Strap #:153254 Land : Struct :$74,200 Agric : Total :$74,200 %Imprvd:100 % Owned: Exempt : Amount : Hillage:14.?594 1995 TX:$1,095.15 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is N O~ner :STANTON ROBERT A & ~u~RGARET L CoOwner : Site :509 ROH~ CT #103 NAPLES 33963 ~ail :509 ROMA CT ~103 NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :03/02/90 Doc ~:1509-1375 ~e ~$100,000 Deed : Amt Loan : V~tType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIU~ Legal :VANDERBILT VILL~S (CONDO) ]1030R :1509 PG 1375 Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: · . : MetroScan/Collier : O~ner :GRAVINA THOMAS J & NANCY B CoOwner :JOSEPH C Site :509 RO}~A CT #104 NAPLES 33963 Mail :26 RIDGE RD ROSELAND NJ 07068 Xfered :10/31/95 Doc ~:2114-0610 Price :$85,000 Deed :SPECIAL WARRANTY Loan Amt:$68,000 Loan :CONVENTIONAL VestType:~RRIED PERSONS IntTy~FIXED Lender :AFI MTG Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~104 : : .at:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: Folio ~:79807500064 Strap ~=153254 1033A21 Land St~uct :$74,200 Agr~c Total :$74,200 %Imprvd:100 % Owned: Exempt :HOMESTEAD Amount :$25,000 Hillage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$726.15 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant Folio J:79807500080 Strap #:153254 1043A21 Land : st=uct :$74,200 Agric : Total :$74,200 %Imprvd:lO0 % Owned:lO0 Exempt : Amount : Millage:14.7594 1995 TX:$1,095.15 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not JAN 1997 Owner =LIDRBAUCH NORMAN J CoOwner =KAREN S KNEZEVICH Site. :509 ROMA CT #105 NAPLES 33963 Hail :8418 GLENEAGLES CT DUBLIN OH 43017 Xfered :04/30/90 Doc J:1524-1§85 Price :$99,000 Deed : Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) :1524 PG 1585 : Suh/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 * ..... : HetroScan/Collier Owner :CARROLL BARBARA J CoOwner : Site :509 ROMA CT ~106 NAPLES 33963 Hail :6334 NEW LONDON DR COLUMBUS OH 43231 Xfered :04/30/90 Doc ~:1524-1594 Price :$99,000 Deed : Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~106 : : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Folio #:79807500103 Strap J:153254 1~53A21 Land : Struct :$74,200 Agri¢ : Total :$74,200 %Imprvd:lO0 % Owned: Exempt : Amount : H£11age:24.7594 1995 Tx:$1,095.15 -- Phone -- Owner Tenant : Folio ~:79807500129 Strap #:153254 1063A21 Land Struct :$74,200 Agric : Total :$74,200 %Imprvd:100 % Owned: Exempt : Amount Millage:14.7594 1995 TX:$1,095.15 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : i The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. i~ Owner :KAARBO TODD & CARMELLA CoOwner :DAVID;CAROL JOUPPI Sito :509 ROMA CT %107 NAPLES 33963 Hail :7901 CMESSHIRE CT HAPLE GROVE HN 55311 Xfered :10/23/95 Doc t:2111-1412 :e : Deed :AGREEMENT Amt: Loan : {pe:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) 1107 : Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 ,_ : HetroScan/Collier ~.;ner :PAYTON ROBERT C/MARY A CoOwner : Site :509 ROMA CT ~108 NAPLES 33963 Mail :PO BOX 10819 BONITA SPRINGS FL 33929 Xfered :06/25/96 Doc 1:2198-1697 Price :$82,500 Deed :WARRANTY Loun Amt:$66,000 Loan :CONVENTIONAL VestType:MARRIED PERSONS IntTy:FIXED l~nder :WATERFORD MTG Land Use:O004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #1080R :1834 PG 945 .at:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 .......... Lot Acres: £olio t:79807500145 Strap t:153254 ]073A21 Land Struct :$7402~0 Agric : Total :$74,20~ %Imprvd:100 % Owned:lOC Exempt : ~ount : Millage:14~;594 1995 Tx:$1,095.15 -- Phone -- Owner :612-494-3013 Tenant : Folio t:79807500161 Strap ~:153254 1083A21 Land struct :$76,500 Agric : Total :$76,500 %Imprvd:lO0 % Owned:lO0 Exempt : Amount Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$1,129.08 -- Phone -- owner : Tenant : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is No J&N 8 1997 Owner :SERAFIN STANLEY & LUCILLE CoOwne= : Site :509 ROMA CT #201 NAPLES 33963 Hail :5530 S CHRISTIANA AVE CHICAGO IL 60629 Xfered :05/18/89 Doc #:1441-2157 Price :$116,400 Deed : Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy = Lender ~ Land U.~e: 0004 RES, CONDOMINIUM Fo1 Strap ~:1S3254 Land : Struct :$80,325 Agric Total :$80,325 %Imprvd: 100 % Owned: Exempt : Amount : :79807500488 20~3A21 Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~201OR :1441 PG 2157 Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T;48S S:21 Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$1,185.56 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : * ....... : MetroScan/Collier Owner :CAMILLERI LILLIAN CoOwner : Site :509 ROMA CT #202 NAPLES 33963 ~ail :12 NEWPORT ST BRAMALEA CANADA Xfered :08/08/94 Doc ~:1974-0575 Price :$100 Deed :WARRANTY Loan A~c: Loan : Vestl~'Pe: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) #2020R :1974 PG 575 Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25F C:48S S:21 Folio ~:79807500501 2023A21" Strap ~:153254 Land : Struct :$78,025 Agric : Total :$78,025 %Imprvd:lO0 % Owned:100 Exempt : Amount : Millage:14.7594 ]995 Tx:$1,151.60 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But 'Is 'Nol: ~u.w..e..~ AG(NDA~I'I~M/% 8 1697 Owner :NEEDHAM ROBERT J & RITA A CoOwner :CARL~JANE S MYERS . Site :509 ROMA CT t203 NAPLES 33963 ', Hail :8144 VIOLA ST SPRINGFIELD VA 22152 Xfered :01/10/90 Doc t: 1497-0772 :e : $102,000 Deed : Amt: Loan : tType: IntTy: ' .. Lender : Land Use: 0004 RES, CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) %2030R :1497 PG 772 Sub/Plat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) · Census :Tract 101.00 ... Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 Folio #:7980750052? ' · .... ' .Strap l:153254 2033A21 .. Land..~,: ... "Struct :$78,025 Total :$78,025 %Imprvd:100 % Owned: Exempt : Amount : '" Hillage:14.?594 1995 Tx:$1,151.60 -- Phone -- Ovner : Tenant : ,_. : MetroScan/Collier Owner :IMBRIANO TR ERNESTO CoOwner : Site :509 ROMA CT ~204 NAPLES 33963 Mail :509 ROMA CT 1204 NAPLES FL 33963 Xfered :01/26/90 Doc ~:1500-2124 Price :$101,000 Deed : Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~2040R :1500 PG 2124 : [at:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) %sus :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S Z:21 Folio ~:79807500543 Strap #:153254 2043A21 Lend : struct :$78,025 Agric : Total :$78,025 %Imprvd:lO0 % Owned: Exempt :HOMESTEAD Amount :$25,000 Mlllage:14.7594 1995 TX:$782.61 -- Phone -- Owner : Tenant : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. Owner :LINDA 3AKER INV INC Si:= =509 ROMA CT ~205 NAPLES 33963 ~Ta:.' :411 SIMCOE ST N OSHAWA CANADA ~f-_-r. d : 06/18/90 Doc ~: 1537-1010 Prl..' :$103,000 Deed : Lo.~,~ u,t: Loan land 3se:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Lega:t :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~205 S%~',. ?lat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Ce:.~,~ :Tract 101.00 Block 3 ,_. . ....... : MetroScan/Collier U,..,,~:cl' : IMBRIANO ERNESTO .~'~_~e :509 ROMA CT %206 NAPLES 33963 }~a:~] :509 ROMA CT ~206 NAPLES FL 33963 ~ f :L'ed :04/09/93 Doc ~: 1814-0820 p: =~ :$88,500 Deed :WARRANTY Lo >.~ Ant: $ 40,000 Loan : CONVENTIONAL Vest'i'>~e: IntTy: FIXED Lendcr : PRIVATE Land Use: 0004 RES, CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~2060R :1814 PG 82" $',b/)') :~.t:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) .~--.n_~v.~. :Tract 101.00 Block 3 k;2:u: T:48S S:21 £olio ~ :79807500569 Strap ~: 153254 2053A21 Land : Struct :$78,025 Agric : Total : $7S, 025 %Imprvd: 100 % Owned: Exempt : Amount : l{illage: 14.7594 1995 Tx: $1,151.60 -- Phone -- Owner Tenant : Folio ~:79807500585 Strap ~:153254 2063A21 Land : Struct :$78,025 Agric : Total :$78,025 %Imprvd:100 % Owned:100 Exempt : Amount : Millage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$1,151.60 -- Phone -- O-~ner : Tenant : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not ,.-_~ ~..-., ~; ..... . - . JAN 8 1997 , ................... : ~enro~can/~o~er O~ner :HORTARTY MAURTCE F & BARBARA CoO~ner : Site :509 ROMA CT ~207 NAPLES 33963 Hail :7626 MARINER PT MAPLE GROVE MN 55311 Xfered :12/14/93 Doc 1:1894-0542 ce :$79,000 Deed :SPECIAL WARRANTY Amt: $59,200 Loan : CONVENTIONAL ;tType: MARRIED PERSONS IntTy: VARIABLE Lender :HOME SVGS A~ER Lend Use:0004 RES,CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~2070R :1894 PG 542 Sub/Plat=VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) Census :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S S:21 * ................ : HetroScan/Collier Owner :ANDREOULAKIS CHRIS & LUZ CoOwner : Site :509 ROMA CT #208 NAPLES 33963 Mail :6081 18TH AVE NW NAPLES FL 33999 Xfered :05/01/89 Doc 1:1437-0214 Price : $105,000 Deed Loan Amt: Loan : VestType: IntTy: Lender : Land Use: 0004 RES, CONDOMINIUM Legal :VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) ~2080R :1437 PG 214 Lat:VANDERBILT VILLAS (CONDO) sus :Tract 101.00 Block 3 R:25E T:48S ~:21 Lot Acres: Lot Sq Ft: ~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~ Folio ~:79807500608 Strap #:153254 2073A21 Land Struct :$78,025 Agric : Total :$78,025 %Imprvd:100 % Owned:100 Exempt Amount Hillage:14.7594 1995 Tx:$1,1~1.60 -- Phone -- owner =612-420-4805 Tenant : Folio t:79807500624 Strap ~:153254 2083A21 Land Struct =$80,325 A~ric Total :$80,325 %I~prvd:lO0 % Owned: Exempt ~ount : M£11age:14.7594 1995 Tx:$1,185.56 -- Phone -- Owner ~941-598-2103 Tenant %. The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, .ot COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC EXHIBIT NORTHSHORE LAKE VILLAS DESCRIPTION OF LAN'DS TO BE VACATED A parcel of land lying in the southwest quarter of Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier county, Florida being described as follow~: Commencing at the southwest comer of said Section 21 nm N02°12'22"W along the west line of said Section 21 for 1648.10 feet to an intersection will: I]}e westerly prolongation of the south line of Vanderbilt Villas, a subdivision recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages $ and 6 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said line Ngg°56'0T'E 50.25 feet to the southwest corner of said Yanderbilt Villas subdivision and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue N89°56'07"E along the south line of said subdivision for 1301.54 feet to the southeast corner of said subdivision, said point being situated on the north-south quarter line of the southwest quarter of said Section 21; Ihence along said north- south quarter line S01°54'44"E 589.79 fi:et t~ ~.he northerly line of those lands recorded in O.R. Book 1241, Page 727 of said F,~bhc Records; thence along said northerly llne S87°47'41"W 1297.21 feet to the easterl7 right of way line of S-901 (formerly S.R. 865A); thence along said easterly right of way line N02°14'31"W 638.39 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above describes an area of approximately 18.31 acres of land. Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record. COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT~, INC. FLORIDa, BUSINESS AUTHORIZATION NO. LB 2464 Richard J. Ewing, V.F. Professional Surveyor and Mapper Florida Certificate No. 5295 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATU'RI~'AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A I'7_,OP,~A LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER .. CEC FILE NO. 95.145 DATE OF FIELD SUR\rEy: DATE SIGNED:/o- z 2-;:~- 3106 S. HORSESHOE DRIVE · NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 s~ (941) 643-2324 o FAX (q AG£N~)A JTI[I~ JAN 8 1997' ,1) £ .XH!.B.Z.T "A" frill IIIII llllllllllll;lllllllll Rllllfllllllllllllfllll IIIIIIIiil IIII111111 CONSTRUCrlON AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT OF SUBDrVISION IMPROVEMENTS THIS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMEN'I~ entered into this/3 day of_ ~_~,_'SP ., 1996 between Gulfshore Lake Villas, Inc. hereinafter referred to as "Developer", and the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as "The Board". 1. Developer has, simultaneously with the delivery of th[s Agreement, applied for the approval by the Board of a certain plat of a subdivision to be known as: NORTHSHORE LkKE VILLAS SUBDMSION 2. Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Developer to post appropriate guarantees for the construction of the improvements required by said subdivision regulations, said guarantees to be incorporated in a bonded agreement for the construction of the required improvements. NOw, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, Developer and the Board do hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Developer will cause to be constructed: a potable water system, sanitary sewer system, drainage, grading, paving and miscellaneous as outlined in Engineer's Cost Estimate (attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereo0 within 36 months from the date of approval of said subdivision plat, said improvements hereinafter referred to as the required improvements. 2. Developer herewith tenders its subdivision performance securit ! (attached hereto ,457,~~~ JAN g 8 as Exhibit "B" and by reference made a .part hereof) ia the amount of 1 amount represents 10% of the total contract cost to complete construction plus I00% of the estimate cost to complete the required improvements at the date of this Agreement. 3. In the event of default by the Developer or failure of the Developer 1cs cun,~lete such improvements within the time required by the Land Development Code, Collier County, after written notice to Developer, may call upon the subdivision performance security to insure satisfactory completion of the required improvements. 4. The required improvements shall not be considered complete until a statement of substantial completion by Developer's engineer along with the final project records have been furnished to be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Director for compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code. 5. The Development Services Director shall, within sixty (60) days of receipt of the statement of substantial completion, either: a) notify the Developer in writing of his preliminary approval of the improvements; or b) notify the Developer in writing of his refusal to approve improvements, therewith specifying those conditions which the Developer must fulfill in order to obtain the Director's approval of the improvements. However, in no event shall the Development Services Director refuse preliminary approval of the improvements if they are in fact constructed and submitted for approval in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement. 6. The Developer shall maintain all required improvements for a minimum period of one year after preliminary approval by the Development Services Director. After the one year maintenance period by the Developer has terminated, the Developer shall petition the Development Services Director to inspect the required improvements. The Development Services Director or his designee shall inspect the improvements, and, if found to be still in compliance with Collier County Land Development Code as reflected by final approv~u~-ju~_) 2 dAlq 2, 8 1997 Pg...__'<~) _ Board, the Board shall release the remaining 10% of the subdivision performance security. The Developer's responsibility for maintenance of the required improvements shall continue unless or until the Board accepts maintenance responsibility for and by the County. 7. Six (6) months after the execution of this Agreement and once within every six (6) months thereafter the Developer may request the Development Services Director to reduce the dollar amount of the subdivision performance security on the basis of work completed. Each request for a reduction in the dollar amount of the subdivision security shall be accompanied by a statement of substantial completion by the Developer's engineer together with the project records necessary for review by the Development Services Director. The Development Services Director may grant the request for reduction, in the amount of the subdivision performance security for the improvements completed as of the date of the request. 8. In the event the Developer shall fail or neglect to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, upon certification of such failure, the County Administrator may call upon the subdivision performance security to secure satisfactory completion, repair and maintenance of the required improvements. The Board shall have the right to construct and maintaln; or cause to be constructed or maintained, pursuant to public advertisement and receipt and acceptance of bids, the improvements required herein. The Developer, as principal under the subdivision performance security, shall be liable to pay and to indemnify the Board, upon completion of such construction, the final total cost to the Board thereof, including, but not limited to, engineering, legal and contingent costs, together with any damages, either direct or consequential, which the Board may sustain on account of the failure of the Developer to carry out all of the provisions of this Agreement. 9. All of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained ar binding upon the Developer respective successors and assigns of the Develop~ 3 AGE~DA~TEM' ~, J AH 2 8 1997 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board and the Developer have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives this ..//3_ day of . .~,/. .... , 1996. Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the presence of: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ~"yprpv~d'= to t~ and legal sufficient: Collier Coun~ Attorney GULFSHORE LAKE VILLAS, INC. · t'~ lt. ~ Ge~mshman, President BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ~y: ~ ,,~'---z/~ .,C-~ ~,-~,_5 %-- . .... ., ..~ ~/~oh~n C. Norris, Chairman Northshore Lake Villas SubdMsion V. Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Cost March, 1996 I. POTABLE WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 1. Connect to existing 12" water main 1 EA 22" Steel Casing (Jack & Bore) 1 I_3 10" PVC Water Main C-900 Class 200 UNIT PRICE 10" PVC Water Main C-900 Class 150 750.00 10,000.00 10" Gate Valve w/Box Fire Hydrant Assembly, Complete 6 35 LF 13.75 o Permanent Sampling Point 1 2,850 EA · Note: Includes Fittings EA EA TOTAl, POTABLE WATER SYSTEM 13.25 675.00 1,715.00 800.00 750.00 10,000.00 481.25 37,762.50 2,700.00 10,290.00 800.00 62,783.75 II. ITEM 1. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer Main, 0'-6' Deep 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer Main, 6'-8' Deep UNIT PRICE 600 LF 20.23 331 LF 24.23 12,138.00 JAN 2 8 1997 o I0. 11. 12. 10" PVC Sanitary Sewer Main, 0'-6' 780 LF 30.23 10" PVC Sanitary Sewer Main, 6'-8' Deep 356 LF 32.23 10" PVC Sanitary Sewer Main 8'-10' Deep 623 LF 34.23 4' Manhole, Complete 0-6' Deep 3 EA 4' Manhole, Complete 6'-8' Deep 3 EA 4' Manhole, Complete 8'-10' Deep 6 EA 6" PVC San/tary Sewer Laterals 1,336.00 6" PVC Single Cleanout Assembly 1,542.00 6" PVC Double Cleanout Assembly 1,748.00 Connect to Existing P.S. 1.01.18 725 LF 9.59 3 EA 26 EA 1 EA TOTAL SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM 131.80 188.60 1,500.00 23,579.40 11,473.88 21,325.29 4,008.00 4,626,00 10,488.00 6,952.75 395.40 4.903.60 1,500.00 10%1: 0.45 III. ITEM 2. 3. 4. DRAINAGE SYSTEM 18" ADS Smooth Bore 15" RCP, Class III 18" RCP, Class III 24" RCP, Class III 240 LF 2O4 LF 961 LF 186 LF 15.00 28.68 32.09 42.80 3,600.00 5,850.72 30,838.49 7,9~0.80 Aq£NDA J~£M ! JAN g 8 1997 PS. ~ o 10. Catch Basin, Complete w/Grate Junction Box 12 EA 2 EA Flared End Section Flared End Section 24' Catch Basin, Complete w/Grate Type 'C' Control Structure w/Grate Type 'C' 5 EA 1 EA 1 EA 1 EA TOTAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM 1,186.00 1,080.00 2,500.00 3,000.00 1,186.00 2,025.00 14,232.00 2, i60.0~ 12,500.00 3,000.00 1,186.00 2,025.00 83,353.01 IV. ITEM 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. SRADIN0. PAVING & MISCELLANEOUS DESCRIPTION 12" Compacted Subgrade 6" Limerock Base 8" !.imerock Base 3" Asphaltic Concrete 1~" Asphaltic Concrete 2' Valley Gutter Type "E" Modified Curb Type "A" Curb Parking Bumpers 14" x 23" Ellip. RC-'P, Class OUAN. _l. JNrI' UNIT PRICE 10,842 SY .74 7,537 SY 3.25 372 SY 4.25 372 SY 4.70 7,537 SY 2.70 5,583 SY 5.25 190 LF 6.49 136 LF 3.75 5 EA .30 72 LF 33.75 TOTAL 8,023.08 24,495.25 1,581.00 1,748.40 20,349.90 29,310.75 1,233.10 510.00 150.00 2,430.00 JAN 2 8 1997 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Mitered End Sections with concrete aprons. 2 Speed Limit Signs 4 Stop Sign & Stop Bar 1 Handicap Sign 1 Pool Par'king Striping 1 Solid White Thermoplastic Turn Arrows 2 Regrade Existing Swales 500 4" Concrete Sidewalk 4' Wide 2600 Landscaping 1 Street Lighting 1 EA 1,150.00 2,300.00 EA 53.00 212.00 EA 232.00 232.00 EA 75.00 75.00 ES 250.00 250.00 EA 85.00 170.00 LF 15.00 7,500.00 LF 11.25 29,250.00 LS 20,000.00 20,000.00 ES 10,000.00 10,000.00 159,820.48 TOTAL GRADING, PAVING & MISCELLANEOUS AGENDA, dIEM JAN g 8 1997 EXHIBIT "A" ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST IV. POTABLE WATER SYSTEM SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DRAINAGE PAVING, CONCRETE, MISCELLMCEOUS SUBTOTAL $415,367.69 TOTAL (ROUNDED TO NEAREST $1,000) 110% OF TOTAL $457,600.00 $ 62,783.75 $109,410.45 $ 83,353.01 $416,000.00 AGEN DA.JT[I~, ~ JAN 2 8 1997 RESOLUTIO.~; NO. 97 3 RESOLUTION AU~I~ORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE O? t;ORTHSHORE L~J~E VILLAS : 4 REPLAT, A P~EPLAT OF A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT ~:O~; AS NOR'~HORE 5 LAKE VILLAS, A3{D AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF THE PREVIOUSLY P~CORDED ~ 6 PLAT OF NORTHSHORE L~dfE VIL[~S ACCORDING TO THE ATTACHED LEGAL ~ 7 DESCRIPTION, PETITION AV-96-036 ~ 8 ~ERF-AS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, T 9 Florida, on August 13, 1996 approved the plat of Northshore Lake ~ 10 Villas for recording; and : ll ~EREAS, Gulf Shore Lake Villas, Incorporated has filed for a 12 replat of said land~; and .~ 13 ~EREAS, except as provided for in this Resolution, this replat -- 14 does not exWcinguish or in anyway affect the dedications contained in -- 15 the previous plat of these lands; and · 16 6~-=-P~F-AS, Gulf Shore Lake Villas, Incorporated desires to vacate ~ 17 the previously recorded plat as descriked in Exhibit "A"; and ~ 18 ~-HEREAS, the granting of the vacation ~ill not adversely affect ~ 19 the ownership or right of convenient access of other property owners; 20 and - 21 ~'HEREA$, this parcel, the approve~ plat of Ncrthshcre t.~k~ Villas ~ 22 Replat, is a replat of a previously a~proved and recorded !)1~, 23 ~;orthshore Lake Villas, and the filing and recording of thfs aooroved 24 plat shall not affect access to lots previously conveyed uader the .. 25 t:orthshore Lake Villas plat. , 26 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED A2;D ORDERED BY THE BO~D OF CO~;TY = 27 CO.-U2~.I$$IONER$ OF COLLIER COMITY, FLORIDA, that the plat of b'rthshore ' 28 Lake Villas Replat, a part of a previously approved and recorded plat, - 29 Northshore Lake Villas, is hereby approved for recording and the ~ 30 dedications contained on the plat of Northshore Lake Villas. Replat, _ 31 are hereby accepted, and those lands described in Exhibit "A" are ~ 32 hereby vacated. Said vacation shall become valid and effective upon - 33 recordation of the subject replat. ' 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 lO 11 12 13 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED A~;D ORDERED that the Clerk of the Ci£cuit Court shall make proper notation of this action upon the previous plat and record a certified copy of this replat and a cerllf~.ed copy of the vacation resolution in the Official Records of Collier County. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATED: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COM3~ISSIONERS COLLIER COU~TY, FLORIDA 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 24 Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi F. ~-hton Assistant Collier County Attorney By: CKAI P~MAR 25 26 27 29 3O 31 32 33 34 EXECU IVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF "FIDDLER'S CREEKt PEPPER TREE VILLAGE AND BENT CREEK VILLAGE" OBJECTIVE: To approve the final plat of "Fiddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek Village", a subdivision of lands located in Section 22, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the construction drawings, specifications, and final plat of "Fiddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek Village". These documents are in compliance with the County Land Development Code and Florida State Statute No. 177. All fees have been paid. It is the intent of the developer to construct the improvements for this project prior to recording of the plat or to furnish the required amount of approved security for recording purposes at a later date. This procedure would be in conformance with Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Engineering Review Section recommends that the final plat of "Fiddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek Village" be approved with the stipulation that the final plat not be recorded until the required improvements have been constructed and accepted or until the approved security is received to guarantee completion of the required improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact to the County is none. The project cost is $484,648.70, to be borne by the developer. The cost breakdown is as follows: a) Water & Sewer b) Drainage, Paving & Grading - $220,449.30 - $264,199.40 The County will realize revenues as follows: Fund: 113 Agency: County Manager Cost Center: 138900 - Development Services Revenue generated by this project: Total: $9,443.58 Fees are based on a construction estimate ¢ $484,648.70 and were paid in November, 199( f · JAN 2, 8 1997 Executive Summary Fiddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village and bent Creek Village Page 2 The breakdown is as follows: a) Plat Review Fee ($425.000 + $4/a0) -$ 543.20 b) Construction Drawing Review Fee Water & Sewer (.50% const, est.) - $1,102.25 Drainage, Paving, Grading (.425% const, est.)- $1,122.85 c) Construction Inspection Fee Water & Sewer (1.5% const, est.) - $3,306.74 Drainage, Paving & Grading (1.275% const, est- $3,368.54 GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The Concurrency Waiver and Release relating to conditional approval has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office for the project. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the final plat of "Fiddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek Village" with the following stipulations: 1) That the final plat not be recorded until the required improvements have been constructed and accepted or until approved security is received for the uncompleted improvements and that construction shall be completed within 36 months of the date of this approval. 2) Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Construction and Maintenance Agreement. 3) That no building permits be issued until the final plat is recorded. JAN g 8 1997 Executive Summary Fiddler's Creek, Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek Village Page 3 PREPARED BY: ~ohn R. Houldsworth, senior Engineer Engineering Review REVI~ED BY: ~homas E. Kuck, P.E. Engineering Review Manager Donald W. Arnold Planning Services J~,rector ~n~ A. Cautero, Adminis~?ator L ~ Services Co,unity Development & Envlronmen~a~ Community Dev. and Environmental Svcs. DIVISION JRH: ew Date Date Date J/ N 2, 8 1997 p~. c~ ~ulf , of ION MARCO ~ ISLAND CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO RECORDING OF PLAT THIS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO RECORDING OF PLAT AGREEMENT entered into this day ~,f' 1997 between 951 Land Holdings Joint Venture hereinafter referred to as De,':Ioper , and the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereinafter re,Cc, tred to as "The Board". RECITALS Developer has, simultaneously xvith the delivery of this Agreement, applied for the approval by the Board ora certain plat of subdivision to be know as: "Fiddler's Creek Pepper Tree Village and Bent Creek Village" Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code allows the Developer to construct the improvements required by said subdivision regulations prior to recording the final plat. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, Developer and the Board do hereby covenant and ag-tee as follov,'s: Developer ,,,,'ill cause to be constructed site improvements including water, sewer irrigation, roadway, drainage, and street lighting withSn 36 months fi.om the date of approval of said subdivision plat, said improvements hereinafter referred to as the required improvements. Developer herewith agrees to construct said improvements prior to recording said subdivision plat and the Board of County Commissioners shall not approve the plat for recording until said improvements have been completed. Upon completion of said improvements, the developer shall tender its subdivision performance security in the mount of $48,464.87 which represents 10% of the total contract cost to complete construction. Upon receipt of said subdivision performance security by the Development Services Director, the Developer may request the Board of County Commissioners to approve the subdivision plat for recording and grant preliminary acceptance of said plat. The required improvements shall not be considered complete until a statement of substantial completion by Developer's engineer along with the final pr >iect records have "°. JAil g 8 1997 o been furnished to be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Director tbr compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code. The Development Services Director shall, within sixty (60) days of receipt ~,' the statement of substantial completion either: a) notify the Developer in writi;?., of his preliminary approval of the improvements; or b) notify the developer Jn ,qr'[i'irlg of his refusal to approve the improvements, therewith specifying those conditi.,,:' ,,,l,ich thc Developer must fulfill in order to obtain the Director's approval of the. i.mpr",veme;;ts. However, in no event shall the Development Services Director refir.-.e pre!imi~ary approval of the improvements if they are in fact constructed and submitted fbr approval in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement. The Developer shall maintain all required improvements for a minimum per/orl ,~( one year after preliminary approval by the Development Services Director. Attet th:. one year maintenance period by the Developer has terminated, the Developer shaI! p:;:ti.-'w the Development Services Director to inspect the improvements. The Deve'iorm',:n'. So'/ices Director or his designee shall inspect the improvements and, if fount; ~,. b:' ':rill in compliance with Collier County Land Development Code as reflected b? ,.qa.?,l appr, val by the Board, the Board shall release the 10% subdivision performance =.ecufiq,,. The Developer's responsibility for maintenance of the required improvements shal! continue unless or until the Board accepts maintenance resp'onsibility for the County. In the event the Developer shall fail or neglect to fulfill its oblig:~tt,)ns ,ar~,ict thSs Agreement, upon certification of such failure, the County Administrator r,'~.~;. ,'.:!! the subdivision performance security to secure satisfactory completion, ,-~-~.:.,,.. at',:". maintenance of the required improvements. The Board shall have the right ~ c~ .,.qt~uct and maintain, or cause to be constructed and maintained, pursuant to public adw,, ~scrnent and receipt of acceptance of bids, the improvements required herein. The Deve{vper, as principal under the subdivision performance security, shall be liable to pa3, and to indemnify the Board, upon completion of construction, the final cost to the Board thereof, including, but not limited to, engineering, legal and contingent costs, Ioge'.,"t,-r wi0'. damages, either direct or consequential, which the Board may sustain on accoar, t of the failure of the Developer to carry out all of the provisions of the Agreement. All of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained are and shall be binding upon the respective successors and assigns of the Developer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board and the Developer have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives this day of ,1997. Signed, kealed and delivered in ~f: Witness (print.or type name) (print or type/nme) 951 Land Holdings Joint Ventue a Florida General Partnership By: GB 100, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership By: By: GB~,a Florida Co~j~oration Aubrey .! errao.~ ,ub. re_y. J.~_ e President and not individually' ATTEST: Dwight Brock, Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Wei'~el', Collier County Attorney Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida By: Timothy L. Hancohk, Chairman W:\1993\93132',FO ILM S\C&M PEPT1LWPD AG E ~lp~JTJE ~d~ No. ~ JAN ? 8 1997 "'- 7 EXECUTIVE SUMR4ARY WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE FOR PELICAN MARSH, UNIT EIGHT, PHASE ONE OBJECTIVE: The Board of County ~,.snj~O. ssioners, Ex-Officio the Go,'.~.tning Board of the County Wate;-'.]ew::.r Di~t:'ict, to accept the n~.~..~".~,-constructed water and sewc.~ ~ac:,. ~.:.~ ~:~ to serve Pelican M~r.::],. Uni~ Eight, Phase One and author:; z~ the recordation of the app~'opriate legal documents. CONSIDERATIONS: 1) The developer of Pelican Ma:sh, Unit Eight, Phase One has constructed the water and sewer facilities within dedicated utility easements to serve this development. See attached location map. 2) Deed, Bill of Sale and other relateC documents have been sub,n]tted to Engineering Review Service~ in order for the County to accept the water and sewer facilities i.n accordance with County Or~J.::ances 78-10 and 79-33. 3) The water and sewer facilitie:: ws. lJ be: upon acceptance by the Board, operated and maintained by the County Utilities Divs. sion under a one (1) year maintenance guarantee furnished by the developer. 4) The on-site inspection of tho sewer facilities and water fac~£ities has been conducted by the :'ounty Engineering Inspection se,.~J, on with the finding that the ~te: ~nd 5ewer facilities have bee~, constructed in accordance with County Ordinances and Regulations. 5) The legal documents have been rev).ewed by t~]e County Attorney and are legally sufficient for acceptance by the Board. 6) Surety for utilities Improvement acceptance. is covered under the Subdivision FISCAL IMPACT: The water and sewer facilities were constructed without cost to the County Water-Sewer District. During the first yea~', the water and sewer facilities are under a Contractual Guarantee. After that time, the cost' of operating and maintaining the water facilities will be paid by monthly user revenues. JAN g 8 1997 Executive Summary Pelican Harsh, Unit Eight, Phase One Page Two GROWTH biANAGE~4ENT IMPACT: The sewer facilities will be connected to the North County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant and the wa%.~r facilities to the County Reqional Water Treatment Plant. This project will not create a new impact, as it has been planned for within facilities available at present P~ECOb~4ENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners, Ex-.Officio the Governing Board of the County Water-Sewer District, accept the water and sewer facilities for Pelican Marsh, Unit Eight, Phase One, with the following stipulations: The water and sewer facilities to serve the project cannot be placed into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until the following items have been furnished: 1) Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a letter authorizing the placement of these systems into service, and; 2) Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements, and; 3) The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been satisfied, and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire hydrant for ownership and maintenance 4) Receipt of payment for water usage from Utilities bacteriological testing for PREPARED BY: hirley~Nix, E~gi'neering Technician II Date REVIEWED BY: '~ Thomas E. Kuck, P.E. EngJneering'Review Services Manager Date JAN 2 8 1997 Executive Summary Pelican Marsh, Unit EighT, Phase One Page Three attachments Date J/~N 2 $ '1997 P~. ~ VAND. B£AC½ PINE RI DO E cou~s xl VICTOPSA PAP. K ~ -- LOCIY~ION ~OATEt~EY LOCATION MAP JAN 2 8 1997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE FOR RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT OF "TARPON COVE" OBJECTIVE: To approve for recording the final plat of "Tarpon Cove", a subdivision of lands located in Section 18, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. CONSIDERATION: Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the construction drawings, specifications, and final plat of "Tarpon Cove". These documents are in compliance with the County Land Development Code and Florida State Statute No. 177. All fees have been paid. It is the intent of the developer to record the plat prior to construction of the improvements. The security in the amount of 110% of the total cost of the required improvements is being covered by construction and maintenance agreement and an Irrevocable Letter of Credit. This would be in conformance with the County Land Development Code - Division 3.2.9. Engineering Review Section recommends that the final plat of "Tarpon Cove" be approved for recording. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact to the County is none. The.project cost is $560,638.80 (estimated) to be borne by the developer. The cost breakdown is as follows: a) Water & Sewer b) Drainage, Paving, Grading - $236,091.00 - $324,547.80 The Security amount, equal to 110% of the project cost, is $616,702.68 The County will realize revenues as follows: Fund: 113 Agency: County Manager Cost Center: 138900 - Development Services Revenue generated by this project: Total: $11,753D7 Fees are based on a construction estimate of $560,638.80and were paid in December, 1997. JAN 2 8 1997 I .---- Executive Summary Tarpon Cove Page 2 The breakdown is as follows: a) Plat Review Fee ($425.00 + $4./ - $ 814.20 b) c) Construction Drawing Review Fee Water & Sewer (.50% const, est.) - $1,880.20 Drainage, Paving, Grading (.425% const, est- $1,379.33 Construction Inspection Fee Water & Sewer (1.5% const, est.) - $3,541.36 Drainage, Paving, Grading (1.275% const, est.) GROWTH MANAGEMENT I____MPACT: - $4,137.98 The Concurrency Waiver and Release relating to conditional approval has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office for the project. ~ECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Final Plat of "Tarpon Cove" with the following stipulations: Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit as security to guarantee completion of the subdivision improvements. Authorize the recording of the Final Plat of "Tarpon Cove." Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached construction and maintenance agreement. 4. That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the required improvements have received preliminary acceptance. PREPARED BY: John R. Houldsworth, Se~nior Engineer Date Engineering Review REVIEWED BY: Thomas E. Kuck, P.E. Engineering Rev~w Manager Date Donald W. Arnold · Date Plan~-n~-~ervice~/Director _--' ~;i~c'ent A. Caut~o, Administrator Date Community Development & Environmental Services Community Dev. and Environmental Svcs. DIVISION AG£NC~JT£M\ '~"~AN 2 8 1997 0 PR&ECT S ! I LOCA TION MAP JAN 2 8 1997 COLLIER COUNTY LANI) DEVELOPMENT CODE CONSTRUCTION ANI) MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS THIS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS entered into this day of .__, 1997, between WCI COMMUNITIES LIMITED PARTN'ERSHIP hereina~ter referred to as "Developer," and the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "Board". RECITALS: A. Developer has, simultaneously with the delivery of this Agreement, applied for the approval by the Board ora certain plat ora subdivision to be known as: TARPON COVE B. Division 3.2 of the Collier County L~nd Development Code requires the Developer to post appropriate guarantees for the construction of the improvements required by said subdivision regulations, said guarantees to be incorporated in a bonded agreement for the construction of the required improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of' the foregoing premises and mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, Developer and the Board do hereby covenant and agree as follows: Developer will cause to be constructed: The paving, drainage, potable water, irrigation water, sanitary sewer, and street lighting improvements for Tarpon Cove v. ithin twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval of said subdivision plat, said improvements hereinafter referred to as the "required improvements". Developer herev, ith tenders its subdivision performance securiD' (attached hereto as Exhibit "A "and by reference made a part hereof) in the amount of S616,702.68 which amount represents 10% of the total contract cost to complete construction plus 100% of the estimate cost to complete the required improvements at the date ofthis Agreement. In the event of default by the Developer or failure of the Developer to complete such improvements within the time required by the Land Development Code, Collier County, may call upon the subdivision performance security to insure satisfactory completion of the required improvements. The required improvements shall not be considered complete until a statement of substantial completion by Developer's engineer along with the final project records have been furnished to be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Director for compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code. JAN 8 8 1997 The Development Services Director shall, within sixty. (60) days of receipt of the statement of substantial completion, either: a) notify' the Developer in v, Titing O~' his preliminary approval of the improvements; or b) notify' the developer in writing of' his refusal to approve improvements, therewith specify'lng those conditions which the Developer must fulfill in order to obtain the Dkector's approval of'the improvements. However, in no event shall the Development Services Director refuse preliJ'ninary approval of the improvements if they are in fact constructed and submitted for approval in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement. The Developer shall maintain all required improvements for a minimum period of. one year after preliminary approval by the Development Services Dh'ector. After the one year maintenance period by the Developer has terminated, the Developer shall petition the Development Services Director to inspect the required improvements. The Development Services Director or his designee shall Inspect the improvements and, if found to be still in compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code as reflected by final approval by the Board, the Board shall release the remaining ]0% of the subdivision performance security. The Developer's responsihiJiry for maintenance of the required improvements shall continue unless or until the Board accepts maintenance responsibility for and by the County. Six (6) months after the execution of this A_m'eement and once within every six (6) months thereafter the Developer may request the Development Services Director to reduce the dollar amount of the subdivision performance security on the basis of work complete. Each request for a reduction in the dollar amount of. the subdivision performance security shall be accompanied by a statement of substantial completion by the Developer's engineer together with the project records necessary for revie~v by the Development Services Director. The Development Services Director may grant the request for a reduction in the amount of the subdivision performance security for the improvements completed as of the date of the request. In the event the Developer shall fail or neglect to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, upon certification of such failure the Count).' Administrator may call upon the subdivision performance security to secure satisfactory completion, repair and maintenance of the required improvements. The Board shall have the right to construct and maintain, or cause to be constructed or maintained, pursuant to public advertisement and receipt and acceptance of bids, the improvements required herein. The Developer, as principal under the subdivision performance security, shall be liable to pay and to indemnify' the Board, upon completion of such construction, the final total cost to the Board thereof, including, but not limited to, engineering, legal and contingent costs, together with any damages, either direct or consequential, which the Board may sustain on 2 NO. ~ ,lAN 8 997 p~,. ~ accoun! o£th¢ failure of the Developer to fulfill all of the provisions of this Agreement. Ail of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained are and shall be binding upon the Developer and the respective successors and assigns of the Developer, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board and the Developer have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representative this day of ,1996. COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SIGNED, SEALED ANq2) DELrVERED IN THE PRESENCE OF: Developer WCI Communities Limited Parmership, a Delaware Limited Partnership By: ~. ~'~0. ~)~2~ Susan Hebel Watts Printed or Typed Name Senior Vice President Title ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Welgel Count'3' Attorney By:. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO~RS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Chain'nan JAN 2 8 1997 J.&NL'A.RY I0, !997 B £%EF']CIARY. BANK OF BOSTON FIRS.-,,,-,. ~'' '-' '"'*",,.,,,,-.. 8A~K OF' BOSTON POST,.,:r"¢ ~. r"c.,_ B('v,. 1763 DON'=O:.;. ,MASSAC.'-iUSE~TS 02105 LI.S.A, STA_NDBY I. ETTE ~ O~F .~KE DIT .~0061444 V,'C[ CO.',f~IUNI FEES LE~flTED . P,~GIT?,'£ RS HiP ~.0~ LAU'AEL OAK DRIVE, SUITE 500 i N,-',.PLE$, F'L 34108 PRE~ENTED TO THE F]F_ST :XATION.~L BANK OF E~OSTON AT 150 FEDERAL FLOOR, BOSTON. 5'.A 02116 O.X OR BEFOR.E JA, NUARY I0, 1998. ! TEiS C&FDIT L..(, .L:. bE '~'-LL IL) I...; Iu JANL' ~R'~' 1_, Iy9.S, .,~N'D 5EL-LI.L TRER .4L'TO'vl.-~" ,- ': ..... tV,,,' .......... '- ' , l' .A:... :. :,:.L ', _ .:,:,'.x'i'~T R.~ '~R',' ,DF ]'-rS If~.: k C.":L£'.;$ AT L£A51' $~.~'fY (60) D.~YS PRIOR TO .x'] ~2':R~Ai~':' D, Tk:. -:'~ :- ;: ;'1:.- 1' >'.:. T]OY:~ I. ~A.','F. OF BOSTON NO'ITFIF, S T 1997 ~,'~'Y SUCH ? F' ,:, .:; E. NVE REMEDY LFTAI~LL~ (,1.:R LTLR. E N OC~I.E LE]~R OF C~D~ 500614J4 ~ YOUR FAVOR FOR ACCOUN'F G? ~ CI COM31L'b~:~ L~I~D PARTt,~ WtlICE IS A A.I_AB_E AG.~'ST fF:Z& ENTA~ON OF ~ OUR ~P~(~) D~WN Ob' 2~ F~T N.~i'/ON.&L 3.~.~.. OF 5:;570~ ;,% 51'3~T L~ 70 .~5 AGG~GA~ .~MOUNT OF ['5 DOLL_~PC!2 A~' AC CGS~'.(N'~KD BY g~NEFiCL~Y'S STA~b~NT PU~OR~DLY SIGNED BY T~,E COLN~ ?~;(~.GER. CERi'~YLX'~: -wCI COM.xIu'NTTL'S LLMt~D P.~YN'EP~E~ ~ FA~ED TO MEET OR COb~LETE THE I~QI;~b2t, IL~'15 FOR CO~STRUCT~O:~ OF U'~O~MES~ TO ~'CLUDE ST~ET L1GUTLXG. STO~Z, D~,~'AGE. [(O.~D~'.&Yt~A P~'G, POTABLE WATER SAN[TAK~' SEV, EF..'~'OECE~L~IN ~' THE PRO~EC'f~NOXVN AS T.~ON COVE. PERMIT ~.~ 9~;-2U .&ND ~r' i-~. OK A F~'.a~ INSPECTIO~ ~A~SFACTORY TO COLLAR COUNYY. PU~U~X'T TO COLLIER COUNT~ O~'.~'CE NO. 91-I02. HAS NOT BEEN" PE~'OPOIED, ~N'D A SATLqYACTO~Y ALTE~X'ATi~VE PE'.R~'O~',L~NC~ SECU~Y NOT BEE~' PRO~ED TO .~ FO~',LALLY AC~ri~ED BY ~E BENE~CL~Y.' I EACH D~ D~W5 L~ER ~ LE~ER OF C~DIT MC'ST BE.~ b~ON ~ FACE ~E CLAUSE:' DK-ZWN I~DER ~YOC.(ELE 5T~N'DBY LE~R OF C~D~ 50661444 DA~D J.(NUr~Y lO, !~ OF ~E ~T NA~OS.~ BANK OF BOSTON, BOSTON, MA I I THIS LE~ER OF C~IT 3~TS FO~T~ L~ FULL Tile TE~IS OF OUR UNDERTA~'G, .(x D S L. CR E. 5 D ~K F~x G ~L NOT ~ .(N ~ ~ .~y BE MOD~D. ~MENDED, OR .(x~vL~D g~ REFE~'ZhCE TO .(x~ DOCUNiEb~.~'S~UMENT OR AG~E~IE~ I ~'E HE,BY ~G~:E ~'r[~ YOU ~T DK~(S) D~.~' ~'DER ~N~ ~ ~H ~E ~M5 OF ]~ LE2TER OF C~D1T ~L BE DULY HONO~D BANK OF BOSTON THE :~R3T .........~, ,~,-,_: BANK OF EOSTON PCST CF~!C~E [~OX ~763 BOSTON :,¢~..SAC~u;~E~T.S 02~05 U.S.A. PAGE 2, LETI~R OF CF~DZ~ ~O. :,0:'.5t~4~ ; ( A..,r~ ,-. cL'~ C~ ~O TEE -L'~:~OE?,~ CUSTOMS A~'D PK~C~ICE FOR DOCL~IE~TA}::~ f'.,r~c . ~EE A'I~Z~TIOS Gt' GUR LE'i'i~K 07 C?~9IT DE~A~TbfENT, AT 150 ~FE~CE h%:5iEER A5 LNDICA~D A.,O% _. TELEPHONE ~'QU~5 /.';~i ./ /~ JAN ~ 8 1997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERX. qCES AGREEMENT WITH HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS FOR WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE BIG MARCO AND CAPRI PASS IN'LET MANAGEMENT PLAN. QB~ECTIVE: To obtain approval of an Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Humiston & Moore Engineers to implement an erosion control project associated with the Big Marco and Capri Pass Inlet Management Plan, .~0NSIDERATIONS: Humiston & Moore Engineers are currently in the process of completing the Big Marco and Capri Pass Inlet Management Plan. Specific recommendations are included in the plan for managing the inlet to mitigate impacts to adjacent beaches, along with estimates of probable project costs, to ensure long-term protection to the inlet system and adjacent beach systems. The adjacent beach system impacted by this inlet is Hideaway Beach. Due to several rapidly eroding areas along Hideaway Beach, potential damage to residential properties and conservation easements is imminent. Hurniston & Moore Engineers has provided recommended alternatives in the Inlet Management Plan to control this erosion. The Marco Island Beach Renoufishment Advisory Committee reviewed these alternatives and recommended that immediate action be taken to implement procedures necessary to obtain approval of an erosion control project for Hideaway Beach. As such, on February 6, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners approved Amendment No. 1 to the subject Professional Services Agreement. Such authorized the design and permitting of erosion control structures in the form of"T" groins, two at the rapidly eroding areas at South Point and three along the conservation easement in Royal Marco Point, as described in the conceptual design presented in the interim draft Inlet Management Plan report on the Hideaway Beach erosion impacts. These seN'ices have now been completed. Therefore, Amendment No. 2 to this Agreement has been prepared to obtain the services necessary for preparation of construction plans and specifications and for services during construction of this project. The ex'tent of surveys required for final certification are undetermined at this time. Upon receipt of the permit conditions, such services will be obtained through a work order under Contract No. 96-2550, Agreement for Fixed Term Surveying and Photograrnmetric Services Executive Summary Big Marco and Capri Pass Inlet Management Plan Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT: Cost: Fund: Cost Center: Project Number: I;28,085.00; to be obligated in the budget for FY 96/97. (195) Tourist Development - 60%. (I10406) Beach Renoufishment/Pass Maintenance. (80221) Capri/Big Marco Pass Inlet Management. Approval of a budget amendment is necessary whereby funds from the reserves of Fund 195 would be transferred to Account No. 195- 11 0406-631400-80221 for this obligation. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACTi None RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the Board of County Commissioners: Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Hurniston & Moore Engineers for the Big Marco and Capri Pass Inlet Management Plan. Approve the necessary budget amendment, 3. Authorize the Chairman to execute the Amendment. Harry E. Huber, Project Manager IH Office~/~oject s Management RE'~rIEWED BY: ~Adolfo A. {~onzalez,~rector Office)of Capital Projects MTagement Raymo'hd W. Mill~r,¥.E,'Interim Administrator Public Works Division REVIEWED BY: attachment Date: /,IS"'. 9 ~ Marco Island Beach Renourishment Advisory Cornm/ttee Humiston & Moore Engineers AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CAPRI PASS AND BIG MARCO PASS INLET MANAGEMENT PLAN THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 to the Capri Pass and Big Marco Pass Inlet Management Plan Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") between the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner") and Humiston & Moore Engineers, P.A., 10641 Airport Road North, Suite 29, Naples, Florida 34109 (hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant") is made and entered into this day of ~, 19__, by and between Owner and Consultant. WI TN E S S E TH: WHEREAS, under the Agreement, Consultant is providing engineering and surveying services concerning the Capri Pass and Big Marco Pass Inlet Management Plan, and said services being more fully described in Schedule A of the Agreement; and, WHEREAS, the Consultant has submitted a proposal, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B', for provision of additional services necessary to obtain approval and implementation of Hideaway Beach T- Groin Construction Phase Services; and WtIEREAS, the Consultant represents that it has expertise in the type of professional services that will be required for the project. NOW THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are fully incorporated and made part of this Agreement No. 2 to the Agreement. 2. Schedule I3, Attachments A and C, shall be revised as contained in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. 3. Article Five, Compensation: Compensation by the Owner for services rendered in accordance with this Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement by Consultant shall not exceed an aggregate amount of $28,085.00 as provided in Exhibit "B' attached hereto without an appropriate change order or amendment to this Agreement. Otherwise, the Agreement, as amended, remains in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement for the Capri Pass and Big Marco Pass Inlet Management Plan the day and year first written above. Witnes~,.j (2) Print/Type~Nam~ ~l~neSS Print/Type Name Humiston & Moore Engineers, P.A. Kenneth K. Humiston, P.E. President (corporate seal) -2- DATED: ATTEST: Dwight E. Brock, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOblERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Timothy L. Hancock, Chairman Approved as to form and Assistant County Attorney H£Hllmendmcnttjas'form -3- HUMISTON MOORE ENGINEERS EXHIBIT "B" December 19, 1996 Mr. Harold E. Huber, P.E. Office of Capital Projects Management Collier County Government Center 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Bldg. D. Naples, FL 33962 Re: '.-lideaway Beach T-Groin Construction Services Proposal, H&M File No. 3021TC. We are pleased to provide you with this proposal for professional services on the referenced project. It' is our understanding that the proposed services would be Included under our current contrac~ for the Big Marco and Capri Pass inlet management plan as implementation of preliminary plan recommendations. The proposed scope of work will include: Basic Services 1. Prepare an opinion of probable cost of the T-groins and the beach fill. 2. Prepare construction plans and specifications for bidding and construction. 3. Respond to questions form prospective bidders, attend a pre-bid meeting, and review and make recommendations on the bids. Total cost of Basic Services $ 9,570.00 Additional Services 1. Construction observations to include up to 30 site visits, daily meetings with contractor, observation and documentation of the progress of the work, review and make recommendations on contractor's requests for change orders, based upon a construction period of 6 weeks. 2. Coordination with Collier County, the Marco Island Beach Renourishment Advisory Committee, and the Hideaway Beach Assodation during construction review and make recommendations on contractor payment requests. 3. Reimbursable expenses to include copies of construction plans and specifications (10 copies), and miscellaneous expenses including but not limited to: film, photo processing, copies, faxes, and survey supplies. 4. Provide agency final certification based upon surveys to be provided by Agnoli Barber and Brundage under a Fixed Term Contract. Estimated cost of Additional Services $18,515.00 Total Proposal Amount $28,085.00 EIl~BIT "B" Note that item 4 above calls for surveys to be provided by Agnoli Barber and Brundage under their Fixed Term Agreement with Collier County, as has been done previously for the design surveys. It should also be noted that the permits when issued will include monitoring requirements. When those monitoring conditions become known, we will provide you with and additional proposal to futfill the agency requirements. We propose to provide you with these services on a time and materials basis and will bill you monthly in accordance with the attached fee schedule. If this as agreeable to you, plea.se provide us with a modification to our contract and authorization to proceed. Sincerely yours, HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS Kenneth K. Humiston, P.E. Attachments HUMIS1ON & MOOgE ENGINE[ItS - NAPLES, rLOItlDA ,,~ HUMISTON MOORE ENGINEERS AND P[ AMITTI~.~ EXHIBIT "B' FEE BCHEDULE APRIL 15, 1996 HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS Principal Engineer ........................ $100.00/hr Staff Engineer ............................. $65.00/hr Technician ................................. $45.00/hr Administrative Assistant ................... $30.00/hr Facsimile ................................... $1.00/pg Copies (in house) ........................... $0.05/pg Mileage (local <20 miles) .................. No Charge Mileage .................................... $.29/mile Telephone .................................. No Charge All out of pocket expenses not covered above will be billed as expenses and included with the monthly invoice. There will be a 10% markup on all expenses not specifically listed above as well as for any necessary subconsultants or laboratory fees. Invoicing will be provided on a monthly basis unless specified differently in the contract. Payments are due upon receipt of invoice. A late payment charge of 1.5% per month, calculated from the date of invoice, may be imposed on any unpaid balance which remains unpaid more than 30 days from the date of invoice. RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION AND DECLARATION OF EASEMENT CONCERNING THE MAX A. HASSE, JR. COMMUNITY PARK LOCATED ON GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD. D.B.,[EJT,.IJX~: That the Board of County Commissioners approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Resolution and Declaration of Easement concerning the Max A. Hasse, Jr. Community Park. ~: A Declaration of Easement has been prepared and approved by the County Attorney's Office which will be recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The recorded document will provide notification to all interested parties of the 6xistence ora road right-of- way easement on the Max A. Hasse, Jr. Community Park. Resolution 96-396 was approved by the Board of County Commissioners authorizing the acquisition of property necessary to improve Golden Gate Boulevard, from C.R. 951 to Wilson Boulevard. F~: The recordation of the approved Resolution and Declaration of Easement in the -,,~ Public Records of Collier County, Florida in an amount not to exceed $200.00 will be paid fi.om , i account number 338-163650-63041 (Golden Gate Boulevard). :NONE ~ ~, ' N: That the Board of County Commissioners approve and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Resolution and Declaration of Easement concerning the Max A. Hasse, Jr. Community Park located on Golden Gate Boulevard; authorize staffto record all documents necessary in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida in order to obtain clear title to the property. PREPARED BY: ' DATE: _~-- \ k~-~ ~ Tim Richardson, Real Property Specialist Real Property Management Department REVIEWED BY: /~""'"~' ~ DATE: A. N. Korti, Project Manager Offic~ of Capit~,.projects Management /,\ i -....'7 - REVIEWED BY: ~ DATE: Adolfo A. Go~aleziSP.E..,-D'~rector Of F/w,~f Capital Pr. ojec,ts Management Raymond ....... W. Miller~ ' , P.E.'---~ Interim Ad' '~' 'ministrator Public Works Division lo 2~ ]~ ~o RESOLUTION NO. 9 RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COL,'N'I~'. FLOR/DA, AUTHORIZING THE DECLARATION OF A ROAD KIGHT-OF.WAY EASEMENT. WR'EKEAS, Collier County is desirous of c'ncumbenng propcmj curet-rely o~'ncd b) Colh¢? County w~th a toad nlht-of-way e~scmcnt described as foliow~, to wit: The South 25 feet oF thc North ?$ feet of Tract 96, Golden Ostc Estates, Unit No. 4, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page '/9 of the Public Re. corcis of Collier County. Florida, and WHEREAS, '~c &scribed easement is '' neccsnry clement of the Oold~ Gate Bou!evard Expansion Project (^pproved By Resolution Number 96-396); ,,nd W)tEKEAS, thc ease'mc-ne w/Il allow Colhct County to proceed ~nth the expansion project m a t:mcly fashion. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUN"I'Y COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR/DA, that: I. Thc Boazd of County Commissioners, hereby al~rovcs the Declaration of Easement closer:bed ~, Exhibit This Resolution adopted this ~ day of~, 199..._, after motion, second and major.y. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COb'N']~', FLOKI'tJA ATTEST: By:. Dwight E. Brock, Clerk By: Deputy Clerk T~, Chairman Approved as to legal f'orm and sufficiency: He,dj F. Ashton Assis~%m County Anomcy PROJECT: Golden Gate Boulevard PARCEL: Ms A. Hasse Community Park/128 DECLARATION OF EASEMENT THIS DECLARATION is made this day oF____, 199 ., b.', Cc'lher County, a polmcal subdivision the State of Florida, having a maihng address '~ 3.~Gi East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter referred Io as, ' Declarant.' Declarant is Ibc owner or certain real property siluated in Collier Counly, Florida, more fully described as Follows, to wit: Thc South 25 Feet orthe North ?$ Feet of Tract 96, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No 4, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page '/9 of the Public Records or Colher Count.',-. Florida, herema~er referred to as the "Property." DecIaranl hereby declares, lhal Ibc Property is, and shall be held, Irans£e."r.e~,!. conveyed, used and occupied in accordance with and subjec! [o a non-cxcluswe ¢ascme:;: pfivileg~ ~o cn~cr upon, cons~c~ and maintain road right.of, way, sidewalk, drainage facihties on the Prope~y, hereinafter retched lo ~ the "Easement." The Easement, as set forth in this Declaration, shall oind, and Ihe benefits thereof shah inure to the Declarant and its represematives, agents, successors and assigns. rN WITNESS ~dEKEOF, Declarant has caused these presents to be exe:u:cd th.- da:: and ye~' above wntlen. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COM.MISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk By:. Chairman Approved as to legal form Md sufficiency: Heidi F. Ashlon Assistant County Attorney EXHiBiT "A" Page ,. of.. .EXECUTIVE $1?M.MARY ^PPROVE ^ BUDGET AMENDMENT RECOGNIZING CARRY FORWARD ~MOUNT$ FROM FY 1996 FOR COUNT~'IDE CIP PROJECTS IN' FUND $01. OBJECTIVE: To obtain BCC approval ora budget amendment that will allow unexpended funds budgeted for CounD~,4de CIP projects to be carried forward and re-appropriated in the FY 1997 budget. CONSIDERATIONS: Funds were appropriated in FY 1996 for Countywide CIP projeas. Staffwas unable to encumber all the appropriated funds before the end of the fiscal year. These fimds are still required to complete the approved projects. In addition, the budget amendments re-budgets $373,200 in reimbursements from Fire Districts for the 800 MHz Project that were not received in F~'96. FISCAL IMPACT: These unencumbered funds were anticipated for carry forward in the preparation of the FY 1997 Counts~vide ClP budget. FUND PROJECTS RESERVES TOTAL 301 214.275 258,534 $474,409 PROJECT PROJECT CARRY FORWARD TITLE NUMBER REQUESTED TOTAL Immokalee Government Center 80014 $ 100 Medical Examiner Facility 80112 $ 6,207 Immokalee Health Svs 80177 $ 1.600 Immokalee Jail 80196 $ 201,674 New Maintenance Facility 80515 $ 6,294 TOTAL $ I00 $ 6,207 $ 1,600 $201.674 $ 6,294 $215,875 GRO'~VTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATIONS: That the BCC approve/authorize the necessary budget amendment to carry forward FY 1996 unexpended funds into FY 1997 and re-budget 800 MHz project reimbursements for Fund 301. PREPARED BY: CF~.' f'K(L/A-., DATE: S~aro9 Newman, Accounting Technician Office' of Capital Projects Management REVIEWED BY: DATE: George parker, Semor ProJect Manager Offic. e of Capital Pr~ojeets Management REVIE'~q~D BY. _ DATE: Adolfo A G lez P E ~ire~r , A_._Gc~lez, P.E. Offi, cex~jf Capital Pro)ects Management R~yrnond \¥. Miller, P.E., Interim Administrator Public Works Dix6sion q/ ¢ 7 Additlorml Can3. Fomard FL.'N'D 301 COL.'NTYWIDE CAPITAL PROJECTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1500 60013 80014 80101 80105 80108 80112 80151 80152 80161 8O162 80166 8(} 174 80177 8018o 80196 80197 80503 80504 80505 80506 80508 80515 80518 80519 80525 Imm Jail Laundr)' Naplesscape 90 ImmoLalee Gox'ernmcnt Cenler El.tS Station Renovation lmmokalee EMS Complex Sheriffs Boot Camp Medical Examiner lmmokalcc Sioc 'kade Sexier Building A Renovations Reroofing Projects Nc~ Air Condition Bldg F Space Reassignment Gun Range Immokalec Health Svs PC & Telephone Modernization lmmo~lee Jail Renovation BLDG \V Expansion Campus Improvements Em-ironmcntal Impr Lighting Retrofits Govcrnmem BIdg Paint Eleclirc Repairs Nc,' Cnv, Maim Fac Expansion Tax Colleclors Bldg F 4~h & 5th Floor General Bldg Improvement development Svs Bldg Sun'cying Fees Building Improvements Building O~her Contractual Svs Licenses & Pemms Communieations Equipment Elccmcin- Autos & Trucks Hca~ .') Equipmenl Aulos & Trucks Impro~ emcnts Sofm a re "' '- Office Equipment tAD O) FY 96 F'Y96 1:5'96 AMENDED ACTUAL ACTUAL INCREASE FORECAST ENCUMB EXPENSES (DECREASE} 10.000 10.006 (6) 56.()00 26.(IOO 29.150 850 584.900 576.008 8.892 34.300 37.192 (2.892) 3.500 225 3.275 419.500 19.280 93.748 306.472 400.000 42.900 350.893 6.207 137.000 32.451') 100.679 3.871 5.000 5.00o 53.700 53.930 (230) 189.9OO 21.992 205.668 (37.760) 19.700 - 27.266 (7.566) 96.900 - 81.264 15.636 157.45)0 9.591 91.401 56.408 882.4O0 36.447 767.817 78.136 204.600 2.926 201.674 387.00(} 143.965 305.448 (62.413) 2.600 1.750 850 154.(}O(} 14.888 56.81 I 82.301 160.0O0 158.601 !.399 2.900 2.883 17 19.900 - 19.900 85.000 5.148 73.558 6.294 243.600 5.177 231.705 6.718 514.800 6.000 506.967 1.833 17.901 38 ( 17.93% 307.900 112 307.462 326 2.670 2.730 (5.4t)¢)) ].300 ].325 (25) 33 (33) 48.300 35.262 13.013 25 310 (3 I¢)) 7.200.000 1.363.995 6.366.006 (53().oo1 (175) 175 150.000 148.392 1.608 - 1.6o0 ( 1.60o 18.00o 18.00o 67.90O 66.690 1.2 I0 34.200 34.15O 50 59.31)1) - 55.()0i) 4.3(x) PROYECT DESCRIPTION Tmns 5% Commercial Paper Transfer t Airport Authorib- Total To~l Encumb/Expenses 155.40o ( 16 12.~ 1.817.925 (97.661 155.416 12.990.051 Transfer Propert.x Taxes Bond,%oan Proceeds CarD.' Fomard Transfers IntcresVGrams Total 3.149.6OO 3.147. I¢~) { 2.5t n)) 9.421.7OO 9.421.700 311.6oO 311.6OO 369.900 709.030 339.130 13.252.8Cg} 13.589.430 336.630 RE\'EN~'E LESS EXPENSES { LESS F'Y97 BUDGETED CARRY FORWA 385.900 - 599.379 238.969 385.9~) ADDITION.U.. CARRY FORWARD FU~ 301 213.479 Executive Summaries Processed for thc Follox~ing Projects: Budgcl Amendment ~12 Budget Amendment ~28 34.170 78. ] OO [REMAINING FL..,'NDS TO CARRY FOR\VARD 101.209 ] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATED TO 17,IPROVEMENTS AT THE SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners, as the Ex-Officio Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, approve an amendment to a professional services agreement to provide services related to administering our slate revo;ving fund loan. CONSIDERATIONS: An Amendment for Professional Sec'ices Agreement has been prepared for additional services consisting of administration of our state revolving fund loan for improvements to our 8-mgd SCRWWTF. Services to be provided are consistent with our ex/sting March 15, 1994 agreement w/th Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. for professional services pursuant to RFP 93-212 I. On October 22, 1996, the Board adopted a resolution approving final application for a state revolving fund loan in the amount of $14.7 million for Phase I improvements at the SCRW'WTF. Administration services are needed to fac/I/tale the loan. Our consultant proposes to use Angie Brewer & Associates, who specialize in assisting municipalities with funding for public works programs. Total consultant fees and expenses associated w/th Amendment No. 5 for administration and coordination of our state revolving fund loan for the SCRWWTF Phase l improvemems are %2,308, cost-mt-to-exceed based on time and re/mbursable expenses. A summarx' of total fees approved and proposed are as follows: Fees Scope of Services Ori~nal A~eement Amendment No. 1 Amendment No. 2 Amendment No. 3 Amendment No. 4 247,000 322,700 582,000 218,000 2,016,OOO Amend. No. 5 (proposed) 6~,~08 Preliminary Report, Conditional Use Design Report, Dis/nfect/on Design Deep Injection Well Reuse Master Plan, Lakewood Design WWTF design, perm/ts, bid and construct SRF Coordination and Administration Total 53,448,008 Fees approved for payment to-date total S2,266,389 as of November 1996. ! -. - -J Staff has negotiated the proposed scope and compensation as provided in the attached Amendment No. 5 to Professional Services A~eement. Approval by the Count).' Attorney's office is necessary prior to signature by the Chairman. FISCAL D, IPACT: A budget amendmen! is needed to transfer funds as follows: Amount: From: To: Con~.ract 2 .562,308 414-263611-763100-73049 - Sewer Flow Monitoring 414.263611-631400.73053 - SCRWWTF Phase I Improvements, GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners, as the Ex-Officio governing board of the Collier County. Water. Sewer District approve and authorize the Chairman to execute Amendment No. 5 to Professional Services Agreement with Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. related to the state revolving fund loan for Phase I improvements to the SCRWWTF, and a,l~.rove the necessary budget amendment. /"?.l _ ' ,., ' Tom Sa~/erfi~ld, P.E.,a6roj~ct Manager ' Offic. a-OT Capital Projects Management REVIE~VED BY: DATE: _! A , rector Office of Capital Projects Management RayMond W. Miller, P.E. Public Works Division Interim Administrator DATE: CC: Tim Clemons, Wastewater Director Edward Finn, Operations Director Karl W. Boyer, P.E., Senior Project Manager SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLA.NT EXPANSION AblENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement dated March 15, 1994 ('hereinafter "AGREEMENT") is made and entered into this _ day of ., 1997, by and between the Board of County Commissioners for Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida and Governing Board of thc Collier County Water-Sewer District (hereinafter referred to as the "OWNEK") and Hole, Montes &. Associates, Inc., a Florida corporation, authorized to do business in the State of Florida whose business address is 715 Tenth Street South, P.O. Box 1586, 'Naples, Florida 33939 (hereinafter referred to as the "CONSULTANT"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, OWNER and CONSULTANT currently have a valid professional services agreement for the provision of professional services for the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion (hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"), said services more fully described in said AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, OWNER and CONSULTANT agree some modifications to the services being contemplated under said AGREEMENT are necessary; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT represents that he has the expertise and the type of professional services that will be required for completion of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and provisions contained herein, parties agree as follows: ARTICLE ONE 1.1. CONSULTANT shall provide to OWNER professional engineering services in all phases of the project to which this Amendment applies. 1.2 CONSULTANT shall provide professional services in addition to those as outlined in said AGREEMENT as noted in Schedule A of this Amendment, as attached hereto. ARTICLE TWO 2.1 OWNER agrees to compensate CONSULTANT for services rendered hereunder as prescribed in Schedule B, entitled "Basis of Compensation", as outlined in sa~d AGREEMENT with the modifications to Attachments A and C to said AGREEMENT which are attached hereto and made a part hereof. - 1 - X:\92131\SCOP£\SCOP£.JL,HI ARTICLE THREE 3.1 The schedule for said Project, shall be as shown in said agreement with modifications as shown in the revised Schedule C as attached hereto. ARTICLE FOUR 4.1 All articles of .said AGREEMENT, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, and shall not be modified by this Amendment. IN ~qTNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for professional engineering services for the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion the day and year first written above. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO~ FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL SUBDMSION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA AND AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER- SEWER DISTRICT. By:. By: Clerk Chairperson Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney Wimess X:\93t3¢\SCOPE\SCOP£.,~.~ HOLE, MONTES & ASSOCIATES, INC. By: r~ .D., P~. Ronald E. Ben.son, Jr., Ph Vice President (CORPORATE SEAL) SUPPLEMiENT NO. 5 TO SCffEDULE A SCOPE OF SERVICES HMA FILE NO. 93.134 This serves as a supplement and clarification of Schedule A, Scope of Services as provided in the Professional Services Agreement dated March 15, 1994. Th. is project amendment consists of the work that is necessary to assist the County with SKF Management for the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. The scope of services is described as follows: Additional Services The following additional services are to be provided under this Amendment according to the terms outlined in the AGKEEMiEN'I'. ~ - This service includes preparation of the loan agreement, process of reimbursement requests to the stale, monitoring of the WBF_JMBE requirements, process change orders with FDEP, meetings with staff, assisu.nce in setting up and maintenance of the OWNER's files, finance account reconciliation, and provide assistance to stgff with Audits. x:\g313~\SCOP£'~SCOP£.A~.4 - i - SCHEDULE B - ATTACHMENT A Amendment No. 5 SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR BASIC SERVICES PHASE [I-A WWTP Disinfection System Current A.2 Design Report $2,800 A.3 Prelimin~ Design $10,300 A.4 Final Design $3,900 A.5 Bidding Services $1,600 A.6 Contract Administration $9,700 PHASE FI-A Royal Palm Irrigation Pump System A.2 Design Report $500 A.3 Preliminasy Design $5,600 A.4 Final Design $1,600 A.5 Bidding Services By Owner A.6 Contract Admi.tfisu-ation By Owner PHASE II-A WWTP Design A.2 Design Report A.3 Preliminary Design A.4 Final Design A. 5 Bidding Services A.5.1 Reclaimed Water PS/Elec Bldg - Equipment A.5.2 Reclaimed Water PS/Elco Bldg - Com'm.~ction A.5.3 Phase I Improvements A.6 Contract Administration A.6.1 Reclaimed Water PS/Elec Bldg - Equipment A.6.2 Reclaimed Water PS/'Elec Bldg - Construction A.6.3 Phase I Improvements - 1 - X:\93134\SCOP£\SCOP£.,~'~4 $219,000 $750,000 $150,000 $10,000 $15,000 $30,000 $20,000 $120,000 $355,000 Amendment No. 5 $2,800 $10,300 $3,900 $1,600 $9,700 $500 $5,600 $1,600 By Owner By Owner $219,000 $750,000 $150,000 $10,000 $15,000 $30,000 $20,000 $120,000 $355,000 PHASE II-C RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM UPGRADES TO SERVE LAKEWOOD A.2 Design Report $9,000 $9,000 A.3 Preliminary Design $52,000 $52,000 A.4 Final Design $24,000 $24,000 A.5 Bidding Services 56,000 $6,000 A.6 Contract Administration $38,000 $38,000 PHASE rI-D EFFLUENT STORAGE EXPANSION A.2 Design Report A.3 Preliminary Design A.4 Final Design A.5 Bidding Services A.6 Contract Administration To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Dete ~rmlned To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined X:\93134\SCOP£\SCOP£.3,H~ - 2 - 7. SCHEDULE B - ATTACHMENT C Amendment No. 5 CONSULTANT'S ESTIMATE OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES (INCLUDENG DETAILED OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION) Phase I Preliminary Services A. 1.1 Preliminary Engineering Report A. 1.2 Review of Odor Control A. 1.3 Review of Effl. Disinfection A. 1.4 Capacity Analysis Report A. 1.5 Conditional Use Applic. A. 16 Odor Control Comminee Phase I1-A Y$%'TP Disinfection System A.7 Detailed Obse~'ation Phase [I-A Royal Palm Irrigation Pump Station Detailed Obse~'ation Phase H-A WWTP Design A.7 Detailed Observation A.7. I Reclaimed Water PS/Elec Bldg - Construction A.7.2 Phase 1 h-nprovements Current Budget S 172,000 Incl. Above Incl. Above $15,000 $35,000 $35,000 $3,700 By O~'ner $90,000 $265,000 Amendment No. 5 $172,000 Incl. Above Incl. Above $15,000 $35,000 $35,000 $3,700 By Owner $90,000 $265,000 - 1 Phase II-B Deep Injection Well A8 Data Review and System A.9 Design and Construction Permit Applications A 9a Add 2nd Deep Well Desi~ & Permitting A. I0 Well Construction Obse~'ation and Testing A.I I Report A. 12 Operating Permit Application 543.000 $90.000 $25.000 $37O.000 536,000 518,000 Phase I']-C Reclaimed Water System Upgrades to Serve Lakewood $43,000 $90,000 525,000 $370,000 536,000 $18,000 A.13 Detailed Observation $16,000 $16,000 A. 14 Surveying/Easements $22,000 $22,000 A.I 5 Permitting $6,000 $6,000 A. 16 Stamp Assistance $5,000 $5,000 Phase [I-D Effluent Storage Expansion To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined A. 17 Detailed Obse~'ation A.I 8 Surveying/Easements A. 19 Permitting A.20 Startup Assistance Additional Services To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined Surveying Perm itting/Approvals Reuse Master Plan Reimbursable Expenses Geotechnical Site Investigation Progress Photos Stas'tup Assistance O&M Manual Operational Support Semices Warranty Inspection FDEP Operation Permit FDEP SKF Management $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $75,000 $75,000 $I0,000 $10,000 $2,000 $2,000 $15,000 $15,000 $40,000 $40,000 $50,000 $50,000 $35,000 $35,000 $8,000 $8,000 $I0,000 $10,000 Not Authorized $62,308 - 2 SCHEDULE C Amendment No. 5 PROJECT SCHEDULE Preliminary Engineering Report Conditional Use Application Capacity Analysis Report Odor Advisory Panel WAWI'P Disinfection System Design Report Pr¢l~ Design Final Design Bid Services Con_ctrucfcn Contract Admin. Detailed Observation Pcrn-d tting/Approval$ Royal Palm Irrigation Pump System Design Report Prelimim~ Design Final Design Permitting/Approvals W~q'P Design Report Preliminary Dr~ Report Final DT~ Report Final Report Reuse Master Plan Preliminary Dra~ Report Final Draft Report Final Report Complete Complete Complete On-going Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete complete Complete X:~931]~\SCOP£\SCOP£.N'¢¢ - 1 - Deep Injection Well Data Review & Design Analysis Design & Construction Permit Appl. Well Construction Testing Reports Operating Permit Appl. Reclaimed Water System Upgrades Design Report Preliminary Design Final Design Bid Services Construction Contract Admin. Detailed Observation Surveying/E~ements Permit'ting Startup Assis'm~ce Effluent Storage Expansion Design Report Prelh-ninary Design FLr~ Design Bid Services Construction Contract Admin. Detailed Observation Surveying/Easements Permitting Startup Assistance WWTP Design Preliminary Design Reclaimed Water PS/Elec Bldg Phase I Improvements Fh'~l Design Reclaimed Water PS/Elec Bldg Phase I Improvements Surveying Geotechnical Site Investigation Complete Complete Complete Ongoing Ongoing Complete Complete Complete Begin Al~ter Permits/Approvals Begin After Permits/Approvals Begin After Permit.s/Approvals Complete Ongoing Begin After Construction Complete To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined To Be Determined Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete X:\92;3¢\SCOP£\SCOP£.,~%~¢ - 2 - ~p Construction Phase Services Bid Services Reclaimed Water PS/Elco Bldg Phase I Improvements Construction Contract Administration Reclaimed Water PS/Elec Bldg Phase I Improvements Detailed Observation Reclaimed Water PSfElec Bldg Phase I Improvements Start'up Assistance Reclaimed Water PS;F_,Iec Bldg Phase I Improvements Complete Complete Ongoing during Construction Ongoing during Construction Ongoing during Conslruction Ongoing during Construction Begin following Substantial Completion Begin following Substantial Completion X:\93134kSCOP£~SCOPE.AH.( o 3 - /~, ~ )Lq ) I& ,I Pre~, "','~,~g and #nhanc:n~ ~londa'$ ctuahty of life $~nce 1966 HOLE. MONTES & ASSOCIATES. INC. ENG~N£ER$ PLANNERS SURVEYORS RECEIVED DEC 19 1996 December 19, 1996 OFFICE OF CAP}TAL PROJECTS MANAG£;V~ENT Mr. Tom Satterfield Collier County OCPM 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 33962 Re: Collier Count>' SRWWT'F Contract 1 FLMA File No. 93.134M Dear Mr. Sanerfield: We are submitting a request for an amendment to our contract on the above referenced project to add the work associated with the State Revolving Fund Loan program requirements. The amendment shows using Angie Brewer & Associates, Inc. for the bulk of the work under t?ds requirement. Work under this amendment will consist of preparation of the loan agreement, process of reimbursement requests to the state, monitoring of the W'BE/MBE requirements, process cl',ange orders with FDEP, meetings with staff', assistance in setting up and maintenance of the files, finance account reconciliation, and provide assistance to staffwith Audits. We propose to do the work on a Time & Materials basis with the estimate. Our estimate is as follows: Preparation of Loan Application (ABA) SRF Management (ABA) Total ABA work 5% markup by I-~IA Total subconsultant work ' $8,250.00 $45.000.00 $53,250.00 $55,912.50 HMA Portion Coordination meetings E5 - 18 months x 2 hours/month x $99.00/kr T3 - 18 months x .5 hours/month x $35.00,'kr Assist in Audit E5 - 24 hours x $99.00/N' T3 - 4 hours x$35.00/N' HMA Portion Total $3,564.00 $315.00 $2376.00 5140.00 $6,395.00 Tom Sar~effield Collier County OCPM P~E: Collier Count' SR'~,'~'TF Contract 1 HMA File No. 93.134M November 6, 1996 Page 2 $62.307.50 Total Amendment Amount Time and Materials Estimate $62,500.00 Please advise if this is acceptable as there are several deadlines that need to be met as part of the work identified above. We have enclosed copies of ABA's breakdown for your review. The amount for the SRF management has been reduced from the one given to you and Ed Finn when we met vdth Angle Brewer. The spreadsheet she had when we met contained only the rag' labor casts and did not include an5' overhead, labor benefits & taxes, or the mark'up. If you have any questions, please let me know and we can discuss them. Also enclosed is a copy of the contract amendment for your review. VeD' truly yours, HOLE, MONTES AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Harry H. Holloman, P.E. Director of Projec~ Management/Principal HHH/nsl Enclosures W.~ 19~ 3\93134~.HTO-r,TS61218.DOC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMblENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE A REQUEST FOR FUNDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FLOATING DOCK SYSTE5I TO BE LOCATED AT THE CAXAMBAS LAUNCH FACILITY. Objective: To have the Board of Count)' Commissioners approve the funding for the construction ora floating dock system at the Caxambas Boat Launch Facility. Considerations: On August 13, 1996, the Board entered into an agreement with the Gulf Coast Rowing Association, Inc. for the use of the Caxambas Boat Facility for recreational programs. More specifically, this site would be used for rowing events and instructional classes which would be open to the general public. In order to facilitate this program, floating docks would have to be constructed. The cost of this project is $10,000. Fiscal Impact: Funding in the amount of $10,000 is available from Fund 306, Parks Construction. Resen'es. Gro,a'th Management: This project is compatible with Collier County's Comprehensive Plan under the Recreation and Open Space Element. Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize funds for the construction of a floating dock to be used at the Caxambas Boat Facility as addressed within this Summary along with the necessary budget amendments. Prepared by: . ,c~,.~!. ~' 7.~,~.,,~-- Date: ,.Gary Fr}tnco, Parks Superintendent Department of Parks and Recreation Reviewed by: ~.~"~-)/_ ~ Date: Skip Camp, Acting Director Department of Parks and Recreation Reviewed by:' x~_ 3,_4..~.-? Q~_ '' Thomas W. Olliff, Adrr[Igl)strator Division of Public Sen'ices Date: Agenda lte~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TO HAVE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE THE BUDGET AMENDMENT RECOGNIZING CARRY FORWARD WITHIN FUND 130 GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER. Objective: To have the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached budget amendment to recognize Carry Forward for Fiscal Year 95 / 96 to complete renovations of the auditorium. Consideration: The recognition of the Carry Forward within Fund 130 Golden Gate Community Center will facilitate completion of the auditorium at the Community Center. The funds will be utilized to complete all necessary electrical needs and handicap accessibility requirements as well as the additional alternate items listed in the architectural plans. The Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Board unanimously recommends to the Board that Carry Forward within Fund 130 Golden Gate Community Center be utilized to complete the renovations. Completing the room in one phase is more convenient to the public since it would eliminate closing the auditorium for purposes of further renovations. Fiscal lmpact: Carry Forward of $65,234 will be placed in Capital Building Improvements. Growth Management: None Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Budget Amendment recognizing Carry Forward in Fund 130 Golden Gate Community Center. Prepared by: ,~'~w,~ '-'~&',,'~,~6, ~ Date: Jo~q Dunnuck, Community Center Supervisor De~ment o$~'arks and Recreation Reviewed b~~~~---~'~'~ Date: Steve PelTers, Recreation Supervisor Department of Parks and Recreation Reviewed by: ~ Date: S~p Camp, Acting Director Department of Parks and Recreation Reviewed by:' \.~:~'~(~ Date: Thomas W. Olliff, Adrr~trator Division of Public Services JAN 2 8 1997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TIIAT TH'E BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONFIRM THE SELECTION OF DR. CItARLES KONIGSBERG AS THE NEW COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR OBJECTIVE: To provide County Commission confirmation of the new Director of Public Health. CONSIDERATIONS: Following the resignation of Dr. Polkowski, advertisements were run for the position of Director of the County's Public Health Director's position. A committee was impaneled that included Ms. Martha Skinner representing the County that interviewed the candidates. From that process Dr. Charles Konigsberg was unanimously voted to be recommended to fill the position. Dr. Konigsberg has since worked out details with the State Department of Health, met with the local medical society, local leaders, and has agreed to accept the position. The County Commission, according to the contract between the County and the State, needs to confirm the appointment. A copy of Dr. Konigsberg's resume is attached as well as a copy of Ns acceptance letter and a letter from Dr. Richard Hunter, the Deputy State Health Officer recommending that the County Commission consider Iris acceptance. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, confirm the appointment of Dr. Charles Konigsberg as the new Director of the Collier County Public Health Department. Prepared by: '-~t ~,_~~ Tho~i;-~7Olli~,'~- Services Administrator JAN 2 8 1997 m PAGE 1 OF ¢' I CURRICULUM VITAE Charles Konlgsberg, Jr., M.D., M.P.H. HOME: 18 Emerson Drive OFFICE: Dover, Delnware 19901 PHONE #: (3..02)697-2560 PHONE #: INTERNET: fhdb05a@prodigy.com INTERNET: P.O. Box 637 Dover, DE 19903 (302)739-47OO ckonigsberg@state.de.us Director, Division of Public Health, Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, Dover, Delaware - (October 1991-Present): Respons!ble for the direction and adm{nistraUon of public health programs for tho State of Delaware. These programs Include statewlde admlnlstratlon of maternal and child health, disease control, Ilcensure and cedlficatlon, and provlslon of long term care in state institutions. In addilion, responsibi[ilies include Ihe direct provision of local public heallh services In the three counties. Division has approximately 1500 employees wilh n $85 million budget. Emphasis placed on moving public health in Delaware toward a new paradigm, wilh more involvement in assessment, policy development and assurance. New initiatives have included primary care cooperative agreement, Healthy Delaware 2000, statewlde AIDS/HIV planning and child health planning. Strong leadership provided for Improving the emergency medical system for Delaware. The Division has been responsible for implementing major new initiatives for the Governor, including comprehensive school based health centers and adolescenl pregnancy prevention. Director, Dlvlslon of Health, Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Topeka, Kansas - (October 1988-August 1991): Responsible for the administration and d~rectlon of public health programs on a statewide basis, including disease control, maternal and child health, environmental health services, adult and child care facility licensing and local health services. Re-established visibility and leadership of Division al Health office. Leadership rotes and special emphasis during my l~nure included developing n strong departmental presence in rural health development, primary care access and improvement of the local public ~;."2: . delivery system. I co-chaired the Kansas public health system as a response to the ln~titule~o~e._~_~ ol.eOlctne's report. ~f Public Hi)alU3. Dudng mytenure, the Bivislon oftea~NTB'~q;? L implemented an Office of Rural Health. a cooperative agreement with the Deparlment of Healtt~ end Human Services for primary care, drafled basic standards for local health departments and other community based clinics. The departmenl assumed leadership in AIDS with a special I'ocus on coalition building. The Division was responsible for securing funding and implementing a health assessment for residents living near an old lead and cadmium mine site, marking the departmenrs first spectre activities in environmental risk assessment. District Health Program Supervlsor/Broward County Public Health Unit Director, Department of Health and Rehabllltatlve Services, District Ten, Fort Lauderdalo, Florida - (~'eptember 1984-October 1.cJa$)t Overall responsibility f~ direclJon of Ihe Broward County Public health Unit and for the Distdct Health Program Ofl~ce. The Health Unit .carves a population of 1,100,000 and 2,000,000 visitors through a comprehensive public health program. The Health Unil, during my tenure, expanded its..ro[(~s ir~ Ihe community by taking lhe lead role in securing and implementin9 a $1,400,000 a year granl from the State of Florida for primary care and continuing the developmenlal phases of a computer network linking primary care providers. The Health Unit provided leadership regarding the AIDS crisis by means of a community task force, testing sites, education and ant.ring into a cooperative venlure with Jackson Memodal Hospital in Miami to develop a comprehensive AIDS Clinic. These eft'ods were Instrumental in securing a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grant to (~evelop the clinic, Director and Health Offlcor, MemphlslShelby County Health Department, Memphis, Tennessee - (April 1980-September 1984): Directed comprehenslve urban (pop. 800,000) health department with 600 employees and $16,000,000 budget (1984). This experience included responsibility for an integrated primar7 care and preventive health services program and for a wide range of environmental health programs, Including pollution control. The department was reorganized, streamlined administratively and new key staff recruiled and retained. New initiatives during my tenure included development of a health promotion program, expanded efforts in prenatal care, modernized food inspection code. personal care home ordinance, loxic waste studies involving both the environment and humans, and a new medical records system. The department created a planning function and was active in developing internal plans and as an advocate for a planned system of' indigent health care. I was promoted to the position of Director of' the Division of Health by tl~e Shelby County Mayor in 1981, but retained my functions as Director o1' the Health Depadment. I was also " appointed by the Commissioner of' thn Tennessee Deparlment of Public Health (now Tennessee Depadment of Health} as Direclor for thc State's regionalized public health programs, including ~ippled children's seP,'lces. ~ I JAN28 997 DlSTSPersonnel Fa: : 813-3~:-1,17,) Dec 12 09:07 District Health Officer, West Alabama District Hualth Department, Tu$caloosa, Alabama o (January 1974- April 1980): Directed organizational and implementation plaasus at development of district health deparlment which merged five single couhty I~ealth departments into a district linking urban Tuscaloosa Couhty with four adJacenl rural counties (total population approximately 175,000). .. District made major advances in public health includin0 recruitment of lop administrative and professional staff, institution of administrative and financial controls, and inservice educatior:. Obtained over $3,600.000 in grant [unds over a five year span. Dlstdct assumed responsibility for regional family planning project and Implemented regional projects including WIC, dental health, home hoallh 3nd health education. Substantial commitment In d.ealing with in[ant modal[fy through Improved Pregnancy Outcome Project. Participated wttli medical school projecl to establish rural pdmary care center. Other projects included implementation of food establishment grading system, rodent control, inservice training course for environmental[sis, lead poisoning screening effod, and Immunization initiatives. New health center constructed in Tuscaloosa. Deputy Director, North Central Health District, Macon, Georgia - (August 1971-January 1974): Assisted Director in administrative and clinical respnnsibility for comprehensNe public health programs, Including mental health, in a foudeen county urban-rural area (population 330,000). General Medical Officer (Captain), United States Air Force, Kirfland Air Force Base, Albuquerque, N.M.- (September 1957-September 196g): General medical practice experience (out-patient). Served as Chief of Dispensa~ Services under Director of Base Medical Services. Staff Physician, Veteran's Administration, Knoxville, Tennessee - (A. pril lg$7 - August 1967): General practice (outpatient). Staff physician, Eastern State Hospital, Knoxvllle, Tennessee - (January 1966-March 19~6): General Practice. Agenda #o. /ir. ~'~ JAN 2 8 1997 Pg. ~ _ CE.' 1992-Present: 1989-1991: 1986-1988: 1980-~984: 1982: 1975-1980: Course coordinator and I~clurer for the public heallh portion of the University of Delaware/Jefferson Medical College Medical Scholars Prog. ram. AdjunCt Associale Professor, School of Preventive Medicine, Departrr~nt of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. Clinical Professor, Department o! Epidemiolocjy and Public Hearth, Universily at' Miami. Assistant Professor in Communily Medicine, University of Tennessee Center for tho Health Sciences, Memphis, Tennessee. Co-taught Health and Social Policy course in Department of Political Science, Memphis Slate University, Memphis. Tennessee. Assistant, Associate Professor in Community Medicine, University of Alabama. B.A. (Psychology). 1962, Vanderbilt University. M.D. - 1965. Unlv6rslty of Tennessee Center for the Health Sciences. Master of Public Health (Community Health Administration}- 1971, University of Norlh Carotina School of Public Health. Internship (Rotating) - 1966-67, University of Tennessee Memorial Research Center and Hospital, Knoxvirle, Tennessee. Realdency in Public health and Preventive Medlclne. 1969-1972, Georgia Department of Public Health. · Ce~fied, 1975, the American Board of Preventive Medicine (Public Health). · Delaware Institute of Medical Education and Research (DIMER) lg96 - Board of Directors · Delaware Health Information Network 1996 - Charter member of Board o! Direclor.,; · Delaware PerinatalBoard 1995 - Appoinled by Governor Tom Carper · Delaware Interagency Coordlnatlng Council (IDEA) 1994 - Executive Committee. 1996 - · Association of State and Terrltorlal Health Officials (ASTHO) Environment Committee - chair- 1995-pre.~¢nt Agen.d~ J ~e~m_~ll JAN 2 8 1997 · Broward County (Florida) Envlronmentel Qual;ty Control Board (Pollullon Control Agency) - 1985-88. · Elderly Interest Fund · Broward County, Florlda (Board of Directors) - 1986-88. · Council of Executive Directors (Broward County, Florida) - 1987-88. · National A~sociatlon of Counties (NACO) Health and Education Steering Committee - 1982-88 AIDS Task Force - 1988 · National Association of County Health Officials {NACHO) Board of Direclors - 1984-88 Vice'President- 198B · United States Conference of Local Health Officials (Affiliated with U.S. Cnnference of Mayors) Board of Trustees - 1982-88 Vice President- 1986-87 · Florida Asaociation of County Health Officials President- 1987-88 · Southern HealthAsaoc[ation Governing Council - 1980-82 & 1985-88 · Florida Public Health Association Board - i985-8G Chairman Public Health Physicians Sec[ion. 1985-88 · Les Passes Rehabilitative Center, Memphis, Tennessee Board of Directors - 1980-84 · Southeastern Regional Council on Development of Nurse Midwifery., 1978-80 · Alabama Public Health Association President - 1979 · West Tuscaloosa Community Health Center Board of Directors - 1977-80 · Mental Health Board(Advisory) of Tuscaloosa, Bibb and Pickens County, Alabama - 1977-78 · Alumni Association, Univemlty of North Carolina, School of Public Health Board of D[rectors- 1979 pROFESSIONAL ASSOC~ · American College of Preventive Medicine, Fellow - 1975-Present. Board of Regents, Region VII - 1989 - 1992 Public Health Regent - 1992 - 1996 · Delaware Medical Society House of Delegates 1994, 1995 · Kent County Medical Society · American Public Health Association · Health Reeources Council - Member of tho Board (Delaware} - 1994- · Delaware Health Care Commission Primary Care Committee. 1995-pre.,;ent · Broward Regional Health Planning Council Primary Care Committee - (1985-88) Medical Facilities Committee. (1985.88) · Memph, ls Jobs Conference Health Committee, Regional Health Planning Subcommittee - (1983-84) Biomedical Research Zone Commitlee. (1983-84) · Mid-South Medical Center Council (Health Systems Agency),1980-83, (Voluntary Health Planning Agency}, 19~3-84 - Memphis, Tennessee. Executive Committee- (1980-83) Vice President- (1983) · West Alabama Health Council (Health Systems Agency, Tuscaloosa, Alabama) Member of Board and Executive Committee - 1974-80. · National Commie,,fen on Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome - 1989-1993 Appointment by Senate Minodty Leader Robert Dole of Kansas. I was nominated by the Nalional Association of Counties (NACO). I served four full years as an active commissioner. · Kansas Public Health Systems Study Committee - Co-chair - 1990-91. · Conaultant to HHS/HRSA on Public Health Practice - 1991-92. · Contributor to report by the MUbank Memorial Fund, Hard Choices In Hard Tirn~, ~~~- May, 1991. · The E.A.C.H. Concept: A Study of Rural Health i~livery Options (Kansas). 1990. Technical Advisory Group Member. · Centers for Disease Control - 1986-87. Scienlific Advisory Commitlee, Hollywood Dump (Memphis, Tennessee) Human Health Effects Study. '· U.S. Public Health Service - June, 1986. Consultant on Development of Public Health Service Ptan for Prevention and Control of AIDS and the AIDS Virus (Coollonl Planning Conference) - was one of the two local health officials invited to this conference. · Center~ for Disease Control-AIDS 1985-86 - Consultant on development of various public hoallh guidelines, · Governor's (Florida) AIDS Advisory Task Force - 1985-87 · Memphis Health Care Coalition. 1982-84 . Business and Industry Health Promolion Conference. April, 1983 (Conference Chairman). u[bl~Yer;onnel ~ax : 8tS-33".-:-~47,j' Dec 12 09:07 · Public Health Leadership Institute - Sponsored by the Centers for Disease Conlrol- Class of 1992-93. · Leader~hip Memphis, Class of 1982 - Select group of community leaders, one ye;,r in depth orientation to the community. · Memphis Jobs Conference- 1983-84. · Colonial Rotary Club (Dover, DE)- 19c.'.'J4-. · Rotary Club of Fort Lauderdale- 1985-[38. · Memphl,s Rotary Club- 1982-84. · Tu$caloosa Rotary Club- 1974-80. · Guy M. Tale Award - 1977, Alabama Public Heallh A~socialion, 'For outstanding service to'lha people of Alabama Ihrough promotion and protection of the public's health.' · Honored by Harvest America - Kan:.as City, Kansas at its 10th Anniversary celebration, June, 1991, for my work with AIDS. · Health Policy Award - Mid Atlantic Association gl Primary Care Centers, January. 1993. · Recognized by Delaware Chapter of the American College of Emergency Physicians - October, 1995, for e[Iorls in supporting the development and improvement of emergency health systems. · Honr.,rery Commander of 436th Aerospace Medicine Squadron, Dover AFB November 1995-May 1990 Applegate, W.B., Runyan, J.W., Brasfield, L., Wllllams, M.L., Konlgsberg, C. Fouche, C., "Analysis of the 1980 Heal Wave in Memphis,' ~ (Aug. 1981, Vol. 29, No. 8). Konigsberg, C., Taft, H.G., "Public Health - A Community Responsibility, 'Medidne, The Community and Health, Charles B. Slack Company (1982). Packer, H., Glassco, S. Konlgsberg, C., "Prostitution m Memphis: Then and Now,' ~(Feb, 1983, Vol, 76, No.2). Tacket, Carol O., Naraln, Jal P., Sattin, Richard, Lofgren, John P. Konigsberg, C., Rendtorff, Robert C. Rausa, Alfio, Davis, Betty R., Cohen, Milchell L., "A Multistate Outbreak of Infections Caused by Yersinia Enterocolilica Transmitted by Pasteurized Milk, of the American Medlc,.aJ_A~oc[a.[[oA (Jan. 1984, Vol. 251, No. 4). Konigsberg, C., Smartt, M.M., 'Momphls: Tho Status o1' Public Health Issues and Programs," .~ (June 1984, Vol. 13, No. 5. Konlgsberg, C. Barrera, M.: "A Local Pubhc Health Perspective on the ~,cqulred Immune Deficiency Syndrome," Nova Unlversl~_Law Royle~..(VoI. 12, No. 3, Spring 1988). Lowry, P.W., Levlne. R., Stroup, D.F., Cunn. R.A., Wilder, M.H., Konlgsborg, C., 'HepaUbs A Outbreak on a Floating Restaurant in Flonda, lYOG," A.M..J,...F~ldcmLoJogy (Vol. 129, No. 1, January 1989). Agenda JAN 2 8 1997 DIST~ersonnel Fax : ~,13-~3~-L~70 Dec ~g Og:07 Konigsberg, C., "The Broward Network for Comprehensive Care for AIDS: A Public health Response," , ' O.C. Ia.t.[.~ (Vol. 76, No. 4, April 198~J). Konlgsberg, C., 'AIDS and HIV: A National and S~ale Perspective," J~3.J:t~l~.J~r.,l.qe (Vol. 91, No. 3, March lggo). Konigsberg, C., 'Is Providing Health Care A Social Obligation?', ~CS (Vol. 7, Nos, 2 and 3, Spring/Summer 1(391. July, 1996 JAN q97 Pg, "~ __ ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE EN FIEALTFI CARE POLICY DEVELOPM2ENT AND LEGISLATIVE MATTERS As a local and state public health official, [ have always been involved in not only traditional public health policy development, but in various aspects of health care and environmental health. This experience has been varied and broad based over the yearn. Examples of health care policy activities include: I0 years of'service on the boards of local and regional health planning agencies in /.,labama and Memphis. Especially in West Alabama, I played a major role with the Health Systems Agency on issues of health care for the urban and rural underserved. I was asked in 1980 to chair ',.he HSA in West Alabama bm declined since I was leaving for Memphis. Aa a member of the board of'the Health Resources Board in Delaware, I worked to broaden its focus fi.om traditional regulatory approaches m Certificate of Need. [ have had a long standing interest and involvement in improving health care access to the underserved. In some cases, such as moving the Broward County Public Health Unit toward the direct provision of primary care, the involvement was quite direct. In other cases, especially in more recent years, I have felt that I could accomplish more by advocacy, educating policy makers about primary care and developing partnerships to improve access. I have looked for opport~ities to bring traditional yet categorical public health programs into the primary care model. It is clear that the penetration of widely accepted clinical preventive services cannot be expected without assuring that all have access to primary care. In the mid 1970's, I participated on the Southeastern Regional Council on the Development of'Nurse Midwifery. 1' did this in the beliefthat innovations in health care delivery were necessary if women in the rural areas of West Alabama were to have a full range of maternity care. At the time, infant mortality rates in that area were among the highest in the nation. 1 made the major management decisions after much thought to move the service delivery of public health in Delaware into the managed care arena. Contracts with all four managed care companies who have contracts for Medicaid in Delaware have been developed and signed. A preventive and early engagement model has been used bringing the strengths of'public health together with the private primary care system. I served on the House of Delegates ofthe Delaware Medical Society's annual meetings for two years. The reference committees of the House are a major component of policy development for the Society. I have always been an active member of my local or state medical societies. [ also was the lone Delaware participant in the March, 1996 Medicine/public Health Initiative. I see major opportunities stemming from that ctTort to at long la. st bring medicine, public health, medical schools and schools of'public heaIth together. [ spent the better part of my time as the Director of Public Health in Kansas working on health care access, especially rural health. During my tenure, the Office of Rural Health attracted considerable support in the Legislature and in the commtmities. I was involved with the EACH/PCH rural hospital restructure efforts which brought several millions of dollars to rural Kansas. I was a member of the retreat and a consultant to the Milbank Memorial Fund as it developed its monograph Hard hoie in Times. I have had ex~ertsive involvement in the HIV/AIDS issue rangS~g far beyond the traditional public health disease control model. While in Broveard County, Florida, [ took the lead in developing a truly comprehensive health and social service model for those living with AIDS. [ served on Florida Governor Bob Crraham's AIDS Task Force. I.n recognition of my leadership, the National Association of Counfies nominated me for a seat on the National Commission on A.[DS in spite ofthe fact that I had left county service for my statewide post in Kansas. Appointed by Senator Robert Dole, [ was an active member of the Commission for four years. The experiences were varied and exposed me to issues in our communities that left profound impressions on me. in addition, during the 1980's, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) frequently called upon me for advice on policy development. I was one of only two state and local health officials invited to the well known "Coolfont Conference" in 1986 which laid out the basic blueprint for the Public Health Service approach to AIDS. I have also had experience in environmental policy development in addition to the traditional public health regulatory activities. I assisted the CDC in their work on the Hollywood Dump in l~emphis after [ left the city. I had a rather unique experience in Broward County, Florida in serving as a boa.rd member of the County's environmental control board. It gave me a chance to be involved in the actual development of environmental policy as opposed to being the bureaucrat. While in Delaw'a.re, I' pushed for and supported successful efforts for public health fi. drilling its roles in environmental risk assessment. As a state health official, I hav~ had fairly extensive experience in the legislative process. As time progressed in my tenure in Delaware, I was m.t~ed more and more to represent the department in maners before the General Assembly. I presented and defended the division's budget for five years. I was particularly instrumental on behalf of state government during 1996 in gaining support for legislation on smoking and youth and i.n trauma systems development. Both bills passed and were signed by the Governor, but not before considerable effort was expended to gain support among various interest groups and make the inevitable compromises that go into any piec_e of legislation. Through these and other matters, [ have learned how things get done in 1'- 2 ~ .lAN 281.qg7 the legislative a:cna. In ad~tio~, I rcgulaHy vis[ted the Delaware Congrc:ssion~ delegation each year and wM in contact with the(r staffs as specific issues arose. My service on the l~a~onal CommL~ion on A.[DS brought me into contact with various members of'Congress as well as one meeting with President Bush. Charles Koriigsberg, J'r., M.D, M.P.H. September, 1996 3 JAN2B1997 I~nusry ~1.1997 Tabu Ol]iff 3341 Tsrnismi Tr~ l{~ N~le~ FL. ~4112 IX~ion of~, Cc · ,g~ry of $II0,000. W Dr. Ko~.~'s ~ ROH/mk Dr. C:l~a.flcs Koriiml Dr. ~ Howdl, of'O~, ~ o KOr~IGSBERG Fax : ~J32-697-~0! ]an 21 16:~ I~ Emerson Drive Dover, DE 19901 ,l~u~y 20, 1997 R/cl'tm'd O. Hunter, Ph.D Deputy State Health Officer Florida Dep(trtment of He*lth 1317 Win~wood Blvd Tallahasse~, FL 32399-0700 Dear Dr. Hunter: It is with pleasure that ! aeceFt your offer of appointment a.(; Director of the Collier County HcaJth Department, as oullined in ),our letter of December, 17, 1996. I understand teat th. is appointment i$ subject to approval by the Collier County Board of' Commissioners. I have indicat~I verbally to the Colher County Mam~ger, Nell Dorrill, that ! wish to proceed with this appointment It is my intention lo report to work on January 31, 1997 I am excited about this pos/t/on, and look forw'm'd to rejoining thc FIor/~ public health Sincerely, cc: James T. Howell, M.D., M.P.It., Secretary JAN 2 8 1. 97 18 Emerson Drive D~vcr, DE 19901 January 21, 1997 Collier County Baud of Comrnsssioners Administration Building 33C 1 E Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 341 ! 2 Dear Commissioncrs: This letter is to indicate tMt I have sccepted lhe Florida Department ofltcalth's offer of al::,poinlment lo the position ofDireclor oflhe Collier County Health Department, subjcc! to your ap~oval I have previously so indicated verbally on January 17, 1997 and in wntmg on January 20, 1997 Io Dr. Richard Hunter, Deputy State Heallh Officer and verbally on January 17 to County Mana~r Nell Dorrill. I would respeclfully request your concurrence with th~s al:T~ointment. I am anxious to begin my duties, hopefully on Jnnuary 31, 1997 I m'n looking forwsrd to your favor~le consideration of this appointment and ~rn exciled abvut servmg the cit/zens o£Collier County. Sincerely, J / , Charlds~oni~berg, gr., M~, MPFI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND ROGER CARVALLO CONCERNING THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OFFICE SPACE. ~: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve a First Amendment to Lease Agreement between Collier County and Roger Carvallo concerning the Finance Department Office Space. ~: On November 12, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners approved a Lease Agreement with Roger Carvallo for additional office space at Court Plaza III (lst Floor) which is the location of the Finance Department. The current rental rate is Thirteen Dollars ($13.00) per square foot. Mr. Carvallo originally proposed a price of Thirteen Dollars and 99/100 Cents ($13.99) per square foot. Mr. Carvallo agreed to reduce the 1't Floor rent as mentioned above only if the rent for the 2~ Floor office (Agreement approved October 25, 1994) was increased fi.om Twelve Dollars and 84/100 Cents (S 12.84) to Thirteen Do llars and No/100 Cents ($13.00) per square foot. Considering both rental rates, the total savings to Collier County for the frrst year is Three Hundred Thirty-Nine Dollars and 45/100 Cents ($339.45). Not taking into consideration annual increases stipulated in the Lease Agreement, by approving the attached Amendment, the cost savings over the life of the two (2) Leases shall be approximately One Thousand Eighteen Dollars and 35/100 Cents ($1,018.35). Since the amended rent is effective as of December 1, 1996, the rental amount for the next rental payment due shall be adjusted to reflect the decrease in rent for the previous months affected by this Amendment. The Amendment also includes a three (3) year renewal term. The amended term now reflects the Lease term for the additional office space on the first floor which shall expire in November, 2000. Both Leases still contain a termination cl.ause for Collier County to terminate the Lease, with or without cause, by providing the Landlord with a thirty (30) day written notice. This First Amendment to Lease Agreement has been reviewed by the Clerk of Courts and the Office of the County Attorney. ~: The amended rent for the 2"d Floor office space shall be Sixty-Six Thousand Three Hundred Dollars and No/100 Cents (S66,300.00) for the first year and any increases in the rent as stipulated in the Lease Agreement shall be withdrawn from account number 001-041010. W N ' : None ]~ p. ECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the First Amendment to Lease Agreement with Roger Carvallo for office space at Courl Plaza III and authorize its Chairman to execute same. PREPARED Michael H. Dowhng, Real Prop~,~ Sp~ia~st :d .""~577C__ _- .. -,,- *;,.c~ -.. DATE:., · Ja~s Mitchell, Director, Finance Department Leo E Ochs, Jr., Ad'minisTor, Public DATE: Services Division DATE: JAN 2 8 1997 ~.~ - l.casc ~;$ l FIRST AM~N~,",~NT TO LEASE AGREE%lENT THIS FIRST A.'",.'~,"','"DS~,',,'T TO LE./,SE AGR.EEMEXT entered into this ..~: da> of ~.~.~. 199.7_. at Naples. CoJher Counly. Florida by lad belwcen Ro~er Cars. alto u, hose m;,.,lmg a~dte~'~l.~T:~t~ ~1 Es:i~,c. PO Box ??14. Naples, Florida 34102, hereinafter refcrre~ lO as "LESSOR". a":~ Co::~cr C'oun:v. a polmcal subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing ad~ress ts 3301 East Tarr4am~ I ra:L Ne;re>. Fio~-ida 34112, hereinafter referred 1o as "LESSEE". WITNESSETH ~,3-~RE. AS, thc LESSEE and LESSOR have previously enlered into a Lease Agreement de:c~ October 1994. thc LESSEE and LESSOR .,re desirous or amend;ag thc Lz~sc Agreement. and NOW TF[ER.EFORE, in consideration of the covenants an~ agreements prov)ded hemr, and ,.,::bm the said Lease and Ten Do:lets ($10 00) and other valuable consideration. Iht said Lca~' AFreement ~,. hereb) ~.mended as follows Thc following is added to Article 2 of the Lease Asrecmcn: If this Lease is not terminated or expired by Nov¢,,mher 30, 109';. th;s Lease ,~ ') ,.a,, autom~:ica:ly renew for three (3) additional terms of three (3) years each 2 The following shall be added to Amclc 3 as follows Commencing on December I, 1996. LESSEE hcrcb',, cnvcn,',n;s and corec,, t: ?,..,, as rent for thc D.-'m:s:~ Premises thc sum ofSixJ).six Thous:'r,d Three ! ....... ¢., Peri:rs ;.,",~ Cr;.. :r,'3 Ce"',:~ (Sb~.30~' CO) per annum in equal monthly Instal!meals of Five Thousand Fi',e Hundred T~,.cnb.fi',c D,~II,~r.~ and r:O.'lr,0 Cents ($S.S25 00) each hereinafter referred to as "Revised Rent" 3 Except as expressly provided herein, this Lease At, recreant between Rocor Ca,"vallo and Collier Courtly for utilization of'thc premises described in said Lease A_qre~cmcn! remains in full ~orce and c,n',cct according lo the ~crms and conditions contained thereto IN WITNESS LLq-t"EREOF, the LESSEE and LESSOR ha~e hcre:c executed :h:s Firs: Amendment to Lease Agreement thc day and year first above written AS TO THE LESSOR DATED~ ,,~-, ~ "~ Witness (signature) (print name) Wimcss (signature)_ (pnnt name) JAN 28 1997 I AS TO TT~ LESSEE DATED: ATTEST: D~qGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BY , Depuly Clerk BOARD OF COL.~TY COMMISSIOXERS. COLLIER COL.~TY, FLORIDA BY: Timothy L. Hancock .Chairman Approved ~s to form Jnd legal su~ciency: Hcidi F. Ashton Assistanl County Attorney ~. //?1..)~ J JAN 2.~ 1997I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TO DECLARE COUNTY-OWNED PROPERTY AS SURPLUS AND ACCEPT THE OFFERS RECEIVED FOR THE SALE OF SURPLUS TERMINALS, KEYBOARDS AND MICROFILM EQUIPMENT UNDER BID # S96-2627. OBJECTIVE: To authorize the sale of surplus terminals, keyboards and various microfilm equipment to the highest bidder responding to Surplus Bid #S96-2627. DESCRIPTION: When the Of]See of Information Technology department was developed, a modernizat!on program for all county departments was initiated. As acquisition of new microcomputer equipment occurs, the DEC dumb terminals and keyboards are being replaced. Various surplus micro6lm equipment was received by the Purchasing Department and was also included in the surplus sealed bid. Pursuant to Chapter 274, F.S. the surplus equipment has been offered to other government entities and to 15 computer-related firms (computer wholesalers, resellers, and remanufacturers). Sealed bids were opened on January 10, 1997, with two offers from computer-related firms being received. Staff has reviewed the bids received and recommends acceptance as follows: ~QMPUTER RESOURCES DRNJ GROUP. INC~ Lot # 2 $151.00 Lot #1 $130.00 Lot # 3 151.00 Lot #5 15.00 Lot # 4 5.00 Lot #6 140.00 Lot # 8 5.00 Lot #7 55.0Q Lot # 9 15.00 TOTAL $~40.00 Lot #10 15.00 TOTAL $ 342,OO FISCAL IMPACT: Revenues in the amount of $682.00 shall be recognized in the General Fund. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the sale and disposal of surplus Bid #S96-2627 to Computer Resources Umlirnited and DRNJ Group, Inc. in the order and amounts as shown above. SUBMITTED BY: REV'IEWED BY: APPROV'ED BY: ura Celedorda, Buyer II, Purchasj~u/¥3epartme Steve C~eH, C~, Purchasing/G~n. Se~ces D~ectur ~o E. Ochs, Support SemSces Di~sion Administrato~ Date Date Date TABULATION FOR BID #S96-2627 "Surplus Terminals. Keyboards & MicrofiLm Equipmcnl" I'N'VITAT1ONS SENT TO: 24 Vendors POSTING DATE: December 23.1996 OPENING DATE: January 10. 1997 VENDOR NAME 'Price offered for Lot *ti Price offered for Lot #2 ~rice offered for Lot #3 :~rice offered for Lot #4 Price offered for Lot e5 Price offered for Lot ,6 Price offered for Lot ~7 Price offered for Lot Price offered for Lot ,9 Price offered for Lot #10 WITNESS: Claire Oss. Purchasing Tec~ician "No Bids" received from: JAN 2 8 1997 Pg. ~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH PCA SOLUTIONS, INC. TO PROVIDE RUNOUT GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS ADJUSTING SERVICES. OBJECTIVE: To seek approv~ from the Board of Commissioners of a contract amendment with PCA Solutions, Inc. for runout group health insurance claims ~justing services. CONSIDERATIQN$: In November, 1996, the Board of Commissioner~ approved First Health, lnc. as its group health claims adjuring company. The City of Naple~ and the Collier County School Board also plae.~t their adjus~g services with First Health as pan of a joint project This service began on January l, 1997. Ali claims inc'~rred on or aRer January l, 1997 will be handled by First Health, Inc. An issue arose regarding claims which were incurred prior to January 1, 1997 but which may not be presented for adju~in$ until after such tLme. These claims are commorfly referred to as "runout" claims. Typically, the new adjusting company will take over these runout claims. Staffnegofiated with First Health to provide this service, however, First Health did not w~sh to provide this ~ervice given their inability to direct resources to handling such runout claims for the County, City and School Board on such short notice. Their concern was that they would not be able to aclequately p~rform the service. Further, they were concerned about the transfer of ~ta from the previous claims administrator, PCA Solutions, Inc., which would be critical in knowing if deductibles had been met. As a result, staff negotiated an agreement with PCA Solutions to handle runou! claims administration. It is presented in the form of an amendment to PCA Solution's original contract with Collier County. The contract amendment calls for PCA Solutions to provide claims adjusting services for a three month period oftime. It gives discretion to the Risk Management Director to extend the amendment until May 31, 1997 if it is de~ermined that outstanding claims remain as of March 31, 1997. Any extension beyond May 31, 1997 requires that the agreement be brought back to the Board. The management of these claims by PCA Solutions, lnc. will also result in a smoother transition o£services. Collier County will be cl'mrged a fee of $15 per employee per month for this service. If the amendment is extended beyond March 31, 1997, the County may select a fee of $15 per employee per month or $15 per claim adjusted. The attached contract amendment has been reviewed by the County Attorney's office and it is recommended for approval. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT;.. None. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of this sen'ice ,,,,.ill be $61,110 for the contract period based upon 1,358 employees. Funds are budgeted under Fund 51-7.121640-631153 for this sen'ice. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of commissioners approve the attached contract amendment g.ith PCA Solutions, Inc. for runout claims administration service. PREPARED BY: Q-_/~ ~eff%(/alker, A~, ~sk M~gement Dir~tor ~VIE~D BY: - ~-i~ ~.~' .~~ DATE: ~ E. Ochs, Jr., Suppo~ S~/4~s A&inistrator JAN 2 19971 AMENrDN~ENT TO CLAIMS ADMYN'ISTRATION CONTRACT BETWEEN COLLLER COUNTY BOARD OF COM2~fISSIONERS PCA SOLUTIONS, INC. This AMENDME~ TO CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION CONTRACT effective January 1, 1997 is entered into this day ofm~, 199___, by and between Collier County Board of Commissioners, Collier County, Florida (the "County") and PCA Solutions, Inc., a Florida Corporation (the "Claims Administrator"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the County and Claims Administrator, did on October I, 1995 execute and deliver a Claims Administration Contract, as amended (the "Agreement") and has also amended said contract effective October 1, 1996: and, WHEIKEAS, the County and Claims Administrator desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to the terrn5 ofthis Amendment; and W~LEREAS, the County desires the services of the Claims Administrator to perform run off claims administration services. Now Therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do agree as follows: Section 8.3 shall be added to Article VIII, TERM F A REEME AND TERM]NATION and shall read as follows: 8.3 la'~ lira Incurr dPri r th T rmin ti n fthi A reement un off laim Pr s in . The County shall have the right to request that the Claims Administrator process claims with incurred service dates prior to the cancellation date of the original Agreement or the Amendments thereto ("run offclaims") but not received during the term ofthe original Agreement or the Amendments thereto and payable pursuant to the County's plan ofbenefits in effect at that time. Such processing shall be payable at a fee of $15 per employee per month and shall be based upon the enrolled employee count as of December 1, 1996. Such fee shall supersede and replace the fees included in this Agreement pursuant to Section 1.16 and Exhibit "A". Such processing services shall be performed for a three month period beginning January 1, 1997. Payment for such services shall be due and payable at the end of the month for which services were performed. If run off claims processing services are sought beyond the term of'this Amendment, the County through its Risk Management Director shah have the right to extend the length of service desired by providing written notice o£its intent to extend the term of'this Amendment prior to its termination date. The fee to extend this Amendment shall be either $15 per employee per month or $15 per claim processed subject to the selection of the County. Payment for such services shall be due and payable at the end of the month for which services were performed. Under no circumstances shall this Amendment be extended beyond May 31, 1997 without the approval of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. Ail other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect throughout the term of the Agreement and the three month period beginning January 1, 1997 and, if applicable, any subsequent extension ofthis Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment this ~, r'~ day of ::3-~,,,,,,~,ey , 199'7. Printed Name of Witness Printed Name of Witness PCA SOLUTIONS, INC. PRESIDENT (Corporate Seal) ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK BOARD OF COUNTY COM]~SSIONERS, COLLEER COUN'TY, FLOR.IDA By: By: Deputy Clerk CHAIRMAN Michael Pettit, Assistant County Attorney JAN 2 8 1997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO OBTAIN BOARD EXAMINATION AND APPROVAL OF THE SUFFICIENCY OF BONDS OF COUNTY OFFICERS. OBJECTIVE: To comply with Horida Statutes, Section 137.05, regarding the Duty of County Commissioners to examine the sufficiency of Bonds of County Officers. CONSIDERATIONS: Section 137.05, Florida Statutes, provides: The county commissioners of the various counties of the ~tate shall at their regular meeting in January and June of each year examine carefully as to the sufficiency of bonds of the county officers of their respective counties, and if by reason of death, assignment, or insolvency of any of the sureties on the bonds of said officers, they have reason to believe that the sufficiency of said bond has become impaired, they shall at once report the same to the Governor, who shall call upon and require such officer or officers to execute and file with the proper officer a new bond for the same amount, under the same conditions as his former bond. The ~sk Management Department has checked the current ratings of the sureties for each bond and found them to be satisfactory. No reason was found to believe that the sufficiency of said bonds has become impaired. A list ofall bonds is attached. The amounts of the bonds have been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and all appear to be within the bounds set by Florida Statutes. In reviewing the sufficiency of the bond amounts, the Board must refer to the Florida Statutes sections shown for each officer below. TAX COLLECTOR F.S. 137.02: The tax collector of each county shall give bond in a sum to be fixed by the board of county commissioners of the respective county, subject to the approval of the Department of Banking and Finance as to amount and surety. This bond shall be specifically conditioned to account duly and faithfully for all taxes collected by the tax collector. In fixing said bond the board of county commissioners shall take into consideration the amount of money likely to be in the custody of the collector at any one time. PROPERTY APPRAISER F.S. 137.03: The county property appraiser shall give a bond, the amount of which shall be fixed by the board of county commissioners at not less than $1,000 or more than $10,000. In fixing the arnount o£ said bond, the board of county commissioners shall take into con~! ~'~A / A .! T(~q . / the amount of money likely to be in the custody of the property appraiser at any Te Km~ l 2 8 lgg? SHERIFF F.S. 30.02: In each county in the state, having a population in excess of 150,000 according to the last state census, the sheriff shall, before being commissioned, give bond in a penalty which shall not be less than S10,000 nor more than S25,000 to be fixed by the board of county commissioners of his count,/', payable to the Governor of the state and his successors in office, with two or more good and sufficient sureties to be approved by the board of county commissioners and the Department of Banking and Finance, and to be filed with the Department of State, which bond shall be conditioned upon the faithful discharge of the duties of his office. SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS F.S. 98.015: (1) A Supervisor of Elections shall be elected in each county at the general election in each year the number of which is a multiple of four for a 4-year term commencing on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January succeeding his election. Each supervisor shall, before performing any of his duties, take the oath prescribed in s. S, An. II of the State Constitution and give a surety bond payable to the Governor in the sum of $5,000, conditioned on the faithful discharge of his duties. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS F.S. 137.04: Each and every county commissioner of the several counties of the state, elected or appointed to such office before he is commissioned, shall be required to give a good and sufficient bond with not less than two sureties, or a surety company duly authorized under the laws of the state, in the sum of $2,000, conditioned for the faithful performance of the duties of his office, which bond shall be approved by the board of county commissioners and the Department of Banking and Finance. The premium of the bonds given with surety companies as sureties shall be paid out of the county treasury. CLERK OF COURTS F.S. 28.02: In each county of the state, having a population in excess of 150,000 according to the last state census, the clerk of the circ. uit court shall, before being commissioned, give bond in a penalty which shall not be less than $5,000 nor more than $100,000 to be fixed by the board of county commissioners of his county, payable to the Governor of the state and his successors in office, with two or more good and sufficient sureties to be approved by the board of county commissioners and the Department of Banking and Finance, and to be filed wi[h the Department of State, which said bond shall be conditioned upon the faithful discharge of the duties of his office. Section 137.10, Florida Statutes, eliminates the two surety requirements found in some of the above-mentioned statutory sections where such surety is a surety company authori:r~cl to tip FARMERS HOblE ADMINISTRATION Fidelity Bond: The Fidelity Schedule Bond involving utilities finance and the Farmers Home Administration in the amount of $150,000 is to comply with the loan remlution entered into by the Board of County Commissioners on July 24, 1979 (attached as Exhibit A). Said loan resolution authorized and provided for the incurrence of indebtedness for the purpose of providing a portion of the cost of acquiring, constructing, enlarging, improving, and/or extending .~-,wage collection .,.-,wices within the area of the Marco Water and Sewer District (Marco Sewer Phase I Improvements). In .,aid loan resolution, it is provided that the Board of County Commissioners acquire and maintain vach insurance coverage, including fidelity bonds, ~ may be required by the United States Government, Farmers Home Admini~ration. County Staff has been advised by Insurance Risk Management Services (the County's insurance broker) that the amount of the bond presently required to meet Farmers Home Administration requirements is $150,000. A.s reflected in the attached schedule, the premium for raid bond is $351. Each risc, al year, review and changes are performed for allowance of reduction of indebtedness of the value and reduction of outstanding bond value. Premiums are assessed for outstanding bond value. FISCAL IMPACT: All premiums listed are for the life of the bond except the Tax Collector's, which is an annual premium. Funds for these bonds have been appropriated under Fund #516 and have been paid. There is no further fiscal impact on the current 1996-97 fiscal year budget. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board examine and approve the sufficiency of the bonds on the attached list. PREPARED B~~~ DATE: Ly~. Evar~, Sera'or Risk Management Analyst KEVIEWED BY: j~-r~y Wal~e~, Risk Management Director Leo E. Ochs, Jr., Su "' Sen'ices Administrator DATE: /~'7/5 7 DATE: ///~?' 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ m m U ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 · ~ ~ ~ 0 o o o 0 0 Om APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENTS BCC AGENDA OF 1/'28/97 WATER IMI:)ACT FEE (411) BUDGET AMENDMENT 97-099 Cgmbined Water Capital Proiect Operating Expense Reserves Total $2,800 (2.$00~ ~xolanation; Fends are needed to make impact fee reimbursements associated with the Wyndcmerc Water Impact Fee Settlement. These were initially overlooked because of delays in refund applications and in some cases because the original impact fee payment had not been initially identified. AGF. NDA ITEM No. t~ ~- b ~ JAN 2 8 1997 Pg. ~, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMEN~ THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCEPT AND IMPLEblENT THE ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION PROGRAM, PHASE II PRESENTED BY THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISORS AND PREPARED BY FLORIDA PLANNING GROUP, INC. !2..B2Ta.CJ..t2~: To have the Board of County Commissioners accept and implement the Economic Diversification Program prepared by the Florida Planning Group, Inc, in conjunction with the Council of Economic Advisors and the Economic Development Council of Collier County. CONSIDERATION: The Board of County Commissioners formed the Council of Economic Advisors to develop strategies designed to enhance the community's efforts to become more competitive economically and increase the number of year round high wage jobs available to residents. On June 18, 1996 the Board of County Commissioners entered into a contract with Florida Planning Group, Inc. to prepare an economic diversification program for Collier County. The Florida Planning Group, Inc. has had monthly meetings with the Council of Economic Advisors, Economic Development Council of Collier County and other interested citizen groups to compile and prepare this Economic Diversification Program. FISCAL IMPACT: This Economic Diversification Plan will guide the implementation of the public/private sector Economic Diversification Program approved in the 1997 budget for $180,000. GROW] H MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The Collier County Comprehensive Plan does not have an Economic Development Element within it, however, the Board of County Commissioners identified economic diversification as an essential item as a goal for 1996/1997. Diversifying the economy to reduce the residential tax base will affect several elements within the Growth Management Plan. RECOMMEN'DATION: That the Board of County Commissioners accept and implement the Economic Diversification Program for Collier County prepared under the direction of the Council of Economic Advisors by. the Florida Planning Group, Inc. and recommend implementation by staff. GMJ~d PREPARED BY: Greg Mih~, Director -- Housing and Urban Improvemen t 7 7 Executive Summary Economic Diversification Program, Phase II Page Two .lames F,. l.o,~kil[, Chairman Council of Economic Advisors ~ Develapmm~t Council of Collier County Community Dev. And Environmental Svcs. Dat~ c/grcg/¢xsumredp Naples Metropolitan Statistical Area Economic Diversification Program Florida Planning Group, Inc. 1. ACTION ITEM SYNOPSIS Collier County Economic Diversification Program Action Items Synopsis PROBLEM: Contrasting Economy: Collier County has the highest median income in the state driven ,n large part by passive income and a seasonal hourly wage base providing limited upward mobility. This places an undue burden on a small proportion of property owners. SITUATION: Tax revenues are overly dependent upon residential property taxes. Continuation of tiffs over-dependence on residential property taxes will result in increased taxes, red',.tztion in services or compromising our qualify of life. This revenue shortfall is aggravated b) lower wage jobs which consume more services than they produce in tax revenue. RECOMMENDATION: The economy is historically population growth oriented. The economy needs diversification to increase year round high wage employment opportunities for residents and to improve economic stability. Program: - Necessary to Achieve Success · Enhance property values through a value added public investment program. · Dc,,.::lop a World Class Medical Community that attracts both practitioners and cuttl:,:~ :~dge technology. Crea~.s. high wage economic opportunities for County residents through small business assistance and customized job training. · Diver>;iB/the local economy to enable residents to establish/expand their businc~ses in the county. · Enh,,c~ce the tourism program by expanding into ecotourism in the (summer) off- SeRSOB. Organizational: - Support of Existing Strong Public/Private Partnership - Required for a Strong Program · Strengthen the BCC's role in economic diversification · Economic Development Council as central focal point · Economic Foundations Committee (business and education) · Business Roundtable Staffing: - Additional Staffand Resources will be Required - Crucial Resources · County: Business Ombudsman/Clerical Support · EDC: Three Additional Professional Staff · Business Incubator Program · Customized Job Training Collier County Economic Diversification Pro,ram Action Items Synopsis Page Two o Limited Use of Incentives: - Leverage Outside Grant Dollars for Optimum Effectiveness Match State Grants · Focus on High Wage Jobs · Focus on Immokalee and Everglades City Budgeting: - Transition From Business Tax to Grant Funds. · County Match $250,000 - EDC Match $250,000 · County Staff- Initial $100,000 · Source- Initial: Occupational License Tax Long-Term: Addition of CDBG Funds Other Actions: - Measurable Accountability · Yearly EDC/CountyPartnership Work Program · Yearly Data/MarketingMaterials Update · Ongoing InventoryofAvailableBuilding/Land 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Naples Metropolitan Statistical Area Background: Collier County (the Naples MSA) is one of the most attractive places in the world. The rare combination of warm climate, extensive natural resources, and the high quality manmade environment epitomized by 'old Naples' have long made the county a popular area. The local economy reflects the area's cachet in the international marketplace as a selective, upscale residential and tourism location. Attract-.,d by this quality of life, the county's population has doubled in the last 15 years. It will add another 100,000 people during the next 15. Along with this growth will come another 30,000 part-time residents, who will visit and maintain seasonal homes in the county. Yet despite this rapid growth, the county is still a relatively small community, with 188,000 year-round residents. Population Growth While future growth is inevitable, the county's residents have raised some legitimate concerns about the cumulative effects of the growth on their lifestyles. They are worried that a decline in the county's high quality of life might result, which would lower their property values and lead to increased congestion and crime. These are very real concerns in an economy that is so heavily baaed on providing a high quality of life. While the county's economy is sluggishly recovering from the 1990-91 national recession, it is still vulnerable to future recessions. The lack of a diversified economy also limits the availability of the high quality workforce needed to provide the levels of service expected in a market like Naples. This type oi economy also places the burden for local property taxes on the county's residents. The county's agricultural industry is now in decline and many local businesses are being adversely impacted by the increased accessibility from the north and east that 1-75 and the Southwest Florida International Airport have brought. There is good reason for these concerns about the local economy. Left to themselves, without a sound plan for economic diversification, these issues can very easily become self- fulfilling prophecies. Economic Diversification Program Executive Summary Faced with this challenge, the BCC appointed a Council of Economic Advisors. representing a wide spectrum of the community, to work in public/private partnership with the business community's Economic Development Council (EDC). Their task wa.: to develop an effective strategy to ad&t-.ss these economically related problems. The county also retained Horida Planning Group, Inc. to provide professional support to this effort. This report is the result of their collex:ti:/e efforts. The Naples' Economy The county has what economists refer :c as a single point economy, one that is driven by a single source. Every economy has d,v::, parts. First are the 'basic' industries, those that are the area's primary employers ','? :q,ples this is the residential consumer market. The secondary industries, like const;~,.'.~.i~..% medical, hospitality and most local manufacturing are directly linked to this basic eec. homy. The support industries, retail, services and government provide services to the se.:o:ldary industries. · S c~vicc s .. Wh~le sale · Oovemm¢ nt · Educ sllon The local economy is, in large mcasur:, dictated by the demographic makeup of the people who live here. People form themselve.~ into households, and in Collier County the house- holds are more likely to: Be older 35 percent are over 65, versus 23 percent for US and 29 percent for Florida. Have higher incomes 18 percent are over $75,000, versus 15 percent for US and 12 percent for Florida. Be wealthier 25 percent have a household wealth of over $250,000, versus 16 percent for both the US and Florida. Collier County has the highest median family income in the state at $48,800, and the highest effective buying income in the state at $41,425. The county's residential market makes up 77 percent of the county's property tax base, significanlly higher than the statewide average of 66 percent. Economic Diversification Program 2 Executive Summa~ Percent of Assessed Valuation Residential Collier Florida As a select residential enclave, the county's local economy is in great measure fled dkecfly to meeting the needs of the large concentration of affluent seniors and part-time residents during the winter season. The significant amount of money that flows into the county from other areas as investment income and ~ransfer payments is the financial underpinning of the local economy. Collectively, these sources accounted for $8 percent of' all personal income received in the county in 1994. The county's lotal personal income by source received from dividends, interest and rents, at 46 percent of all income, is nearly twice the statev.~de average and almost three times the national average. persqnul Dividends, Interest und Rents Collier Florida With die exception of the county's large agricultural sector, centered in Immokalee, and some small manufacturing concerns, over 90 percent of the county's economy is directly tied to the residential consumer businesses market. As a result, the majority of the county's businesses are small and there are many single proprietors. Employment is concentrated in such population growth dependent sectors as consu'uction, retail sales and services. Many of these jobs are seasonal and low paying. The affluent, elderly base directly influences the types of businesses that will be drawn to Collier County. Most of the county's are small. Eighty percent of all companies have rev,'er than ten employees. The county also has one-fifth of its workforce employed as single Economic Diversification Program Executive Summary proprietors. In addition to the long-term cyclical nature of the economy, it is also highly seasonal' busy during the winter season and slow during the summer off-season. Munlhly ~mplo?ment Employment patterns reflect the structure of the local economy. Manufacturing only makes up three percent of the local workforce, versus ten percent of Florida's and thirteen percent of the national workforce. Construction, one of the county's mainstays, makes up ten percent of the local employment base, nearly twice the Florida average of six percent and the US's of five percent. The area also has strong medical, tourism, hospitality, retail, service and agricultural industries. MANUFACTURI,~G SERVICES RETAIL TRADE f Economic Diversification Program 4 Executive Summar7 Future Prognosis The future prognosis for the county's basic economy appears strong. The U.S. economy is healthy and will continue to grow, although it will still be subject to cyclical recession. Florida will continue to see strong, real growth and will add more people over the coming years then any other state in the country. Collier County is also expected to see strong continued growth over the next 15 years, as it adds another :00,000 permanent residents. The county's strong growth sectors will continue to be retail and services, which have low wage structures. The hospitality, construction and the medical sectors will also grow. Why Economic Diversification? There are a variety of reasons why communities engage in economic diversification activities. These include: enhancing property values, reducing residential property taxes, recession-proofing the local economy, increasing local business and year-round employment opportunities for their residents, attracting new businesses, or some combination of all of these reasons. Because each community is different, each has its own community goals, and its own strengths and weaknesses from an economic diversification standpoint. To be successful, each community must develop its own custom-tailored strategy. How? There are two basic rules for successful economic diversification: Rule One: Build on your strengths; and Rule Two: Minimize your weaknesses. Economic Strengths and Weaknesses When seen from a economic diversification viewpoint, every community has strengths and weaknesses. Some are readily apparent, some are not so noticeable, and some are only of interest to particular companies, because businesses look at a community through their own perspective. The Naples area has a number of positive economic strengths beyond its base economy of affluent residents. The county's quality of life is an immense advantage, especially since high technology businesses are now able to locate their companies in almost any location. The county has a high corporate employee transfer acceptance level, a strong hospital network, excellent local schools and public services, and a low crime rate. All of these make the county an extremely attractive location. The Council of Economic Advisors conducted detailed individual interviews with 50 of the county's CEO's. The respondents felt that the county's quality of life was the single most important reason why a company would desire to locate here. Economic Diversification Program 5 Collier County is a small sized metropolitan market (under a million people) and is also relatively remote from a transportation point of view. While this remoteness has help. ed protect the county's high quality of life, it effectively prevents the county from attracnng any large businesses. The lack of a trained workforce was cited by the county's CEO's as the single greatest problem for local businesses. With few available buildings and sites, the county's real estate community ~.!so has difficulty meeting the needs of many businesses, because the vast majority of companies looking at an area want to move into an existing location. Companies are also concerned about ~e existing business mix of an area. Increasingly, companies are beginning to actively ..,eek to cluster together within regions or specific locations. These companies have discovered the a:jva.ntages of the synergy that can be developed by clustering, which includes sharing ideas, drawing from a talented employee base, }oint ventures, and research and development. Collier County presently has no identihed industry clusters to build upon. For some companies the 'cost of doing business' is their primary concern. These companies are affected by the collective cost of payroll, rents, taxes, utilities and shipping costs. These companies can find any number of rr:,.'.re at~ctive locations within Florida, including neighboring Lee County. The county also suffers from a perception that it has a poor business climate. As the county's CEOs also noted, the county is not the location for all businesses. This assessment allows us to develop a profile of the :ype of companies that have a good fit with the county. Essentially, the kinds of companies iha: will be attracted to the county will be small, progressive, high technolGgy oriented, nonpolluting, value-added businesses that are primarily concerned with providing a high quality environment as an inducement to attract and retain a high quality workforce. Program Development The development of a diversification program F~'st requires that some overall goals be established to guide the program. To be successful, these goals must support the community's 'vision' of itself and reflect on the kind of community that its residents wish to leave for their grandchildren. The residents of Collier County generally share the same vision: To maintain and enhance the Naples' world-class quality of life. This vision of the future suggests a number of goals for the economic diversification program: (I) Enhance Property Values through a value added public investment program. (2) Develop a World Class Medicai Community that attracts both practitioners a,.zl cutting edge technology. Economic Diversification Program 6 Executive Summary (3) Create High.Wage Economic Opportunities for County Residents through small business assistance and customized job training. (4) Diversify the Local Economy to enable residents to establish/expand their businesses in the county. (5) Enhance the Tourism Program by expanding into ecotourism in the (summer) off-season. WNle these may at f'rrst glance appear to be disparate goals, they are all interrelated within the context of the Naples' economy. (1) Enhance Property Values Maintaining property values is one of the primary purposes of local government and is certaiN? a legitimate governmental concern. The long-term strength of the county's basic industry- the overlapping combination of affluent retirees, seasonal residents, and tourism - is directly dependent on maintaining a high quality of life environment. In the long run, preserving the county's quality of lite is the single most important thing that the county can do for the local economy. Enhancing property values requires that the county adopt a value added, investment oriented growth management program. This strategy includes acquiring and preserving the county's extensive natural resources, adopting high quality urban design standards, fully funding road and storm drainage programs, providing high quality public service levels and having top flight schools. In conjunction with this effort the county should adopt a strategy to shift its general business and manufacturing facilities east of the interstate. (2) Develop a World Class Medical Community With the large concentration of senior citizens within the region and the high quality of life within the community, the superior locally based medical industry of Collier County has the potential to attract top flight medical practitioners and medically-related high technology and research facilities. The medical technologies sector is one of the most rapidly growing sectors of the world economy. Expanding this sector would increase the level of medical services available to the county's residents, as well as diversify and strengthen the local economy. The medical sector offers the greatest potential within the county to grow into an industry cluster. (3) Create High.Wage Economic Opportunities for Local Residents The current economy will continue to create a number of Iow paying, cyclical and seasonal (busy during the season, laid off during the off season) jobs in the retail trade and services industry. The lack of business and employment opportunities in other sectors ultimately hurts the local business community's ability to attract the quality labor force that is necessary to provide the high business service levels that are the Naples' standard. To achieve this goal will require the county to emulate its neighbors and implement comprehensive small business assistance and customized job training pro.ams in partnership with the local business and education communities. These programs are designed to help local residents prosper as ,.,,'ell as ensure th:it the county can maintain a high quality worlcforce. Economic Diversification Program 7 Executive Summary (4) Diversify the Local Economy Diversification can help to both recession-proof the local econotny and shift the tax base away fi.om residential to non-resident'ial uses, which typically pay far more in local property taxes then they require in public services. Collier County should not expect to be home to any major industries, nor should it seek to am'act them, but it is an ideal location for those resident; that wish to locate their high value add,:d small business near their homes. The hnmoicalee area, with its upgraded airport arid business park, offers a high quality location for locating new businesses to the area. 'Ire 1-75 interchanges also offer excellent locations for new corporate office park development. 1,nplemenfing this program will require a public/private partnership with the local business and real estate community to ensure that there are available sites and buildings for new companies. (5) Enhance the Tourism Program The county's highly successful tourism program focuses on the county's world class resort facilities located we~t of US 41. Unfortunately, the seasonal nature of this program leaves these facilities apd their employees underutilized during the s,Jmmer. The fastest growing sector of the international tourism market is in ecotourism, ,'~[ 'Milch the county, with thc Everglades National Park and its other large nature preserves is ideally suited to serve. Because this rr, arket is not seasonally driven and often occurs in the summer, when families and Europeans u'avel, it is a natural complement to the county's existing tourism development program. Action l'lan While the county is new to economic diversification, it cat, draw on the lessons learned from successful economic diversification programs acro:~s Florida and the nation to develop a custom-tailored, cost effective program to achieve the county's diversification goals. The recommended Action Plan has five interrelated components: (1) Continue a Quality Growth Management Program. The county government w/Il need to continue its strong role in adopting and funding a value-added capital improvements program, especially for roads, drainage and natural resource preservation; mainta/ning high public service levels and strong design standards: and working with the education community to ensure that the county's schools are the best in Florida. (2) Form and Support a Strong Public/Private Partnership. The county will need to join with the local business community to create a single organizational structure to support the overall diversification efforts. The existing EDC can form the basis for this partnership, but it will need to be augmented to handle the additional duties it will be undertaking. This combined organization should enter into the ongoing regional and storewide economic diversification efforts, and will need to be supported through county funding, as it is in all other Florida communities. Economic Diversification Program , ~ ~lll I I I III I III I I II IIIIIIIIII III I I Executive Summary (3) Improve the Business Climate. There are a number of actions that the county can take to improve the business climate. These include: forming a CEO roundtable to provide a forum for the county to hear local business concerns; publishing a 'Guide to Local Porn'fitting' handbook to assist local businesses with regulations; streamlining the development review process (currently the number two business incentive in the country): forming an economic diversification rapid response technical assistance team; and providing and maintaining a detailed socioeconomic information database on the county. (4) Develop a Coordinated Business Assistance Program. There are a number of successful programs available to help increase opportunities for local resider ts. These include a small business development center and business incubator programs that assist in business startups; a retention/expansion program to help existing businesses prosper; business financial assistance packaging support; and customized job training programs. Collectively they will enable the county to effectively support its small business community. (5) Diversify the Economy. The county can best support the diversification effort by assisting those residents who wish to locate or expand their businesses within the county, as well as recruiting the select group of high value added technology-oriented companies that have a good fit with the county's existing business makeup. This effort will require that the county maintain up-to-date .marketing and informational databases, respond to informational requests, maintain an inventory of available buildings and sites, conduct targeted business recruitment programs, and package any business incentives that may be required. This program will enable the county to address the concerns of its residents and its business community, diversify the local economy, and form a lasting partnership for progress. Economic Diversification Program 9 3. COMMUNITY PROFILE , Location 2 Population 3 Households $ Employment 7 Transportation 10 Business Costs 1I Banks anti Depositories 12 Education 13 Housing 14 .Medical 15 Quality of Life 16 For more information contact: Economic Development Council of Collier Count)' .~_00 Bailey Lane, Suite 162 (941) 263-8989 Naples, Florida 33942 (941 ) 263-6021 Fax www: swflorida business, com,'naples.edc Collier Count.,,', the Naples MSA, is located in the heart of Southwes! Florida, at the center ora vibrant. !ntemational ly-oriented community. Although easily accessible to major metropolitan areas. Collier County ~s largely untroubled b)' urban woes. With a total area of 2,149 square miles, and a land area of 2,02~ square miles, Collier is the second largest county east of the Mississippi River, and is larger than the states of Rhode Island and Delaware. Yet, it is unlike nearly an)' other area. Here, a population ofextraordinary sophistication li~es in hah'nom,' with an env:ronment ot' awesome beauty. For businesses, their owners and emplo.¥ees alike. Collier Count',' is an opportunity without comparison, l.(,caled on Florida's unspoiled Southwest coast Collier blessed with an unparalleled combination of business potential and livabilitv. This is the second fastest growing metropolitan area in the United States, with an afTluent population and significant business resources. Yet, at the same time, it is a community in which quality of life is carefully guarded and continuously enhanced. That's why the people of Collier Count), consider this to be truly a paradise found. : L~GEND COLLIER SW4~.fP · '. .... G~,~F of Mexico Florida's Southwest Coast Seaports 0 DADE ~ The Naples MSA s~ts m the heart ofthe three-county Southwe,;~ ['!ur~da Region. Collectively, this area has been, ~,qct .,. ,,'. cor, tinue to be, one ofthe fastest growing regions ;,, the countrs,. This area's popula- tion will grow from 694,800 today to !,100,500 in 2015. Collier 187,400 ! ':. 321,000 Charlotte 129,500. '1:,,.~ 214,200 Lee 377,900' ',:.: 565,300 ~:: 1,100,500 Total 694,800 .No.r~ ¢ ! .tverqtg' of l.'lort, ht, lce~t,,,r~ h, 1996 There are slight('.,, Jess than 200,000 people living in and around Naples today. There were only 16,000 people liv;%; ,~., Ihs County in 1960, while the population is expected to increase to about 353,500 by 2020. Colti,., ,',5~mt,/. like th,: state of Florida, expects to continue growing far into the future. In addition, thc L'ou~, v's year-round population rises by one-th/rd during the Winter Season (Nov.-Apr.) when/ts scaso~ql residents and visitors return. R,'~c.,~h, 19'~t, ~9(.9 15,753 1970 38,040 1980 85,971 1990 152,099 I'¢95 187,400 2r;00 224,100 2t)lO 288,600 3,';3'*', "' '"' . - , -,5.~.500 0 53.3(;0 IO0.CgC 1530CO 200 OCO 253.~0 303003 3."0 0~3 ,~02 0O3 Age Group Number 0-14 35,714 15-24 19,038 25-44 49,933 45-64 " ", .~7,79.~ 65--- 45,319 Rc~,'urch. 25-44 26% 15-24 10% 0-14 9% White 95% Black 5% "I0tal 100% Hispamc Origin* 13% 'th.vx~.tc~ may he ora.)' race .ho. rte 1990 ~'S ('e~st~s Collier 40.7 Florida 36.4 U.S. 32.9 45-64 24% 20% Collier 10% Flor/da 13% U.S. 13~o Populations group themselves into what are called households, v.'hich are comprised of families and non- family households. In 1990, 72% ofth': Counb"s households were also families. Number Percent Families 44. t 36 72% Non-Families 17.510 28% Total 61,646 Households $34,001 Families 38.428 Non-Families 23,317 538,776 /996 S35 - 50 000 $2g. 25 ,24 6% I Over $,~ 000 Median EI3I 537,624 Total EBI: 54.2 Billion .~Unc~e- 20 000 21 6% S48.800 Collier County had the highest Median Family In- come and Household Median Effective Buying In- come (EBI) in the State. .¥ourr¢ : Deparmrem of Ho..*m$ m~l ( 'tho. Dev¢/o?n~em Collier Percent Florida U.S. <S25,000 21,747 29% 34% 37% $25 - 50,000 6,070 8% 9% 9% 550- I00,000 10,438 14% 16% 15% $I00-250,000 18,464 24% 25% 23% S250-500,000 II,302 15% 11% 11% >5500,000 7,501 10% 5°,/0 5% .5'ourt¢ ('1. IR/I. D,. 1996 Median Household Wealth Collier Florida U.S. S98,831 $71,301 $63,860 Coil/er CountT's households have lugher household weahh ranges when compared to Florida and U.S. households. Total <25 25-45 45-65 65-80 >80 Total Households 76,022 2,809 22,590 22,885 21,157 5,581 <$5,000 2,232 153 734 586 582 177 S5- 10,000 3,525 116 824 792 1,305 488 S10-15,000 4,339 184 1,128 939 1,553 535 SI5-25,000 11,451 702 3,268 2,851 3,619 1,011 S25-35,000 12,410 614 4,096 3,348 3,259 823 535-50.000 15,161 619 5,520 4,517 3.622 883 550- 75,000 13,549 306 4.775 4,570 3.165 733 575- I00,000 5,933 66 1,749 2,177 1,557 543 5100- 150.000 4,382 33 951 1,723 1,363 312 S150- 250,000 1,574 9 280 634 528 123 5250. 500,000 1,058 5 152 443 363 95 >5500,000 678 _ 9 72 305 24 ] 58 .Median Income: S38,776 Age <25 25-45 45-65 65.80 >80 Total Number Percent Income Number 2,809 4% <525,000 21,547 22,590 30% $25.50,000 27,571 22,885 30% $50 - 75,000 13,549 21,157 28% $75- 100,000 5,933 5,581 7% >$100,000 7,692 76,022 100% Total 76,022 Pe rce n t 28% 36°/6 ! 8% 8% 10% 100% ~:~'h:~'%'~',"~ [: .'..5, ,~; ~'~t.',~ ,'..' '. Thc Counb,'s ~oml l~bor pool oF83,490 p~ople c~n o~r ~ ~id~ r~n~ oF~mplovmem skills to ~ potemi~l employer. . · ~';,:.'.,c, ,,.~ i;,¢ ':.... '~ .'.:? - ..' ~5.1..; .~:.....,.... -. AgrJcu ture, Forestry and Fishing 10,68.3 Mining 3.5 Construction ?,206 Manufacturing 2,299 Transportation, Communications and Public Utilities 2,027 Wholesale Trade 1,973 Re~ail Trade 18,795 Finance, Insurance and Rea//-"state 4,541 Services 24,451 Govemrnent 7,844 F/I/RE Services 1% Government '"'-'-------10% V,~olesa TICIPU '"danufaclunr~g 2% 3% 3% 83,490 ':"- ' "Z "%':'::': s .i,,,i~ -::,.~...'~; High School Graduate 79% Bachelors Degree 15% Graduate'Professional Degree 7% .~ rte: /990 ~'A (.'etHtt~ Year Collier Florida 1990 5.6% 5.9% 1991 7.9% 7.30,'o 1992 9.4% 8.2% ~o, 1993 8.~ ,o 7.0% 1994 8.0% 6.6% 1995 6.80;0 6.00.0 .~mn. e Flurt, lu I A'p.rm,e.t of l..h,,r t#~l £m?lfft me,tt .sec ttrt~ Company Nnme Type of Business Employees PuH~x ~,:~ ' 'dtk:'t Inc Re,ad Ch~e~ Su~rkel 17:55 Mam,,u' ,;~ 'u,n lime[ Re~o~ctad R~t/L ~:lt,,, :, Hold and Restauram 7~ N~pIc~ H~ :..h Ho~cl and Golf Club Hotel B~mcu ~. :, of N~p~cs }~ 275 Cable TV S~cc 225 K-Ma~ L~ q~rahor ~pa~m~t Store 285 Dax~d 12 *. rcn,.~ Mcr,~l Hcahh Ccr,:cr Memal Ileahh Cbmc M~nng~ Par~ }{omc~ Iht Aged Marc~ It:~ch Ihh,,~ I[(,~cl Vineyard, ~,,l(and C,*unt~ C'Jub L'~mn~. Cluh ..~ M~,m~, n. Inc Re~taurant~)~c~ 200 Cot~)tty O¢cup.don .Mc~,n Mcdbm M.txlmum ~pm~on O~cr Finance. ]nsura~e. Real ..Mo,u,Hanm~ S 19 FM S l 7 .I I S 50 ~ C'(mlputct LlcrmCal Su~,~,,r~ II (H Il 49 IX 19 C*,mpulcr ['n~mnccr~ Rcccph,,n,~t, ~ 19 7 9~ 12 ~t) C~N)L~ ~ ~2 8 ~ I~ 2.1 Hotcl [~k Clerk~ Msnuf~c[uring Jamh,r~ and Cl~ncr~ 7 29 ? 23 12 2') A~mblcr~ and [abrtcalor~ ? J2 6 2~ 14 70 Medical A~I~IauI~ 9 ~)g I*) ~ I ~ (~1 [)ral'~et~ 1.1 27 I~ ~ 17 50 I',r~t-hnc I'rt~ucm,n Su~.,~ r~ 1~')5 19.~ 3U.~ Radi(*K~cal Tcchmc~an~ I~( Industrial Pn~uchnn Managers 25 79 22 99 42 07 Salcs~r~n~ Rctad 6 65 6 ,~ lo 23 [.a~rcrs and Malcna] Mmcrs 6 69 6 44 13 ~ .Machmc~ Mcchmmcs 12 ~ 12 50 J5.2~ ('~s~uc/ion Off~cl Press O~ra~ors [2 32 12 ~0 1450 Sh~pp~n~ and Rccc~m~ Clcrk~ 7 ~ ? 54 12 8~ gh<k L'lcrk~ 6 98 6 62 10 46 C,,n~Irucht,n ~,,rkcr~ ~ :.', '.;unr¥ is home ',o a number ofsmall lo mid-size companies. Industry Total 1-9 10-49 50.249 >250 A.t~ '.,':uirure 262 229 27 4 Mi r:,m.._, 9 7 2 0 0 C',",: ,',t~ '..t~on 885 716 151 18 0 M~,,',~r'~ctur/ng 180 129 42 8 1 , .... ~- :." atlorl and Put,:,.. I i:~,ties 211 165 42 4 0 V,'h".!¢ ..,~e Trade 311 262 46 3 0 t,9;' '; '"..de 1,616 1,151 373 91 I Fin~ -,~ .. ' ,nsurance ar,:! Fe~i Estate 886 764 109 12 i Set'...,.:,..~, 2,137 1,761 292 74 I0 Unrl~sqfied 74 71 3 0 0 'Ibta~ 6,571 5,255 1,087 214 15 Percentage 100% 80% 1 7% 3 % . "~' I 'SUni} has a ~:,rg..-scale agricultural compo- ,' ~ "" eaqte-n pnr, on ofthe County, centered ...... ~,:.),.:dlCC, ,,,:t 'r?j',,' agricuhural area and ,': ". ,:ente~ ?bt a ,,'~de range of fruits, plants ,". ,' ,co,-, ables Commodity Acreage Sales Tomatoes 12,780 $111,500,000 Peppers 4,150 S52,800,000 Cucumbers 1,400 $17,300,000 Watermelons 800 56,400,000 Squash 800 S4,500.000 Potatoes 2,300 S 14,000,000 Green Beans 1,780 S4,200,000 Citrus 36,534 S34,000,000 Misc. 950 $1,500,000 BeefCattle 238,680 53,441,074 Ornamentals 1,530 58,015,000 Total 302,704 S257,656,074 .V~mr~ ¢.. I )m',,r~s~. oJ' l'7,,rt, la ['.'rtcn~to. .~,,ra.tt e, I'196 Daily Fhgh~s Passenger Airlines .,Xm~mcan Airpom $pe~.~c.~iion~ Canad~n A. Run..: ;en~*~ ' ~'flx lYJfi q'(~r l~ha A~rhnw. ,~:nrlh,, e~l T',,x, '., Iff ,;ed United Expre.~ s Charter Airlines: Alt Il,,! Alrx'..~,~..,, %tiT1 ,I.vl AV Al h,ntlc Vl~our~l All' I~xpr~s ~ ~e l~l~ure Parad~ kl.no Rmo Sun ~'~nl ~ ~952 198q 198~ 1987 1986 ?985 1934 /,,J' 9 3C2 9'0 ~990 ~ 2e3 ~73 . 1985 . 5 I0 15 20 Pou~S o~ Cargo. Mdlions 25 Coil/er County is also home to four large, well-maintained general aviation airports includim, the Naples Airport ,,:.'l':.~c h offers commercial commuter flights. ' Airport Runway Length Naples 5,000 (2) Marco Island 5,000 Immokalcc 5,000 Everglades 2,400 Western: Seminole Gu[fRailway ]mmokalee' CSX Aircraft Movements Commercial Carriers 108,000 AmeT/can Eagle. USAm C'ontt:l,:ntaI I".xpres~ 8,700 22,000 348 · .:, ..ti'.?,:,:.. ". . '.. Interstate 75 to Tampa (North) and Miami (East/' South) · :' . . ,3 · ;':.'-:'.: 10 Millage Rate C0unb' Governmental Operations 3.4899 Debt Service 0 School District 8 5930 Debt Servicc 0 Spec~at Services D/strict 0.0506 Independent Special Sen,ices District 0.4570 Collie: Count)' has the lowest property tax rate wn the State Total ,~).rce ('o/her Eleclrical Competiti,,e Rates Florida Power and Light Water $I 75 -2,47/1,000gallons 12.5895 Sewer $160/1,O00gallons Solid XVaste ",'aries bv location Total Rental %'acanca- Square Range Rate Feet (per Square Foot) Leasable Office Space 2 2 million 59-24.00 14% Leasable Industrial Sp~c 20.1.0o0 $7.8.0{~ 12% // State 'ounty continues tu provide high-quality local schools ihat are considered to be the best in the , ~ lorida dhi!,;%to e ....,esc';oolteachersala~in * Ex~nditure~rpupilisS4,884 'm: .. 'e a~ 336,417 ~r )'tar · 755% of 1995 high-school ~aduates are continu- · " :. "c'hc, s;~,~vea, ,astersDemeeorhigher ing their education · 2 ',, ~' h,;dr,,~ ;re emol~ed in C~llier County lli~h-schooleraduationrateis94% qtah ,?:. :he i'lational median and :adi,:- ( , ~prehension and Math- rad,~ , I '~;-~,:ssment Test (GTAT). Collier Florida 53 50 61 51 Collier Flor/da U.S. Communications 441 420 428 Mathematics 501 469 482 Total 942 889 920 Percent of'Seniors taking the test 50% · Yource ('olher Cou.0 ~ hoot D~(tmc t 48% 41oo Sch .~ '~'. ',)e Number Enrollment Ele, . qt~. ,'(PreK-5.~19 13,256 .Mic '(( "'~; 6 5,569 Fl;,; ) 4 5,980 E,. s(K-!2i 1 260 Voc , :It ~ '-Ad.~h) ~) 2,565 Thc '.2,dq)' ~s also nomt: [o a number of private schools a,'~d academies. Collier Count), is also home to a range ofcol- leges including the State's newest universiv,: · Florida GulfCoast University · Walden University · Edison Communi't), College · International CollegeofNaples 12 200000 ~$200,O00 14% ..... / 30% !501 24% $75. 100.000 17% <$50.000 4% 75.O00 11% Median value in 1990:S121,400 Median value in 1996:SI36,483 Median rent in 1990:S572 permonth Median rent in 1996:$700 per month :,' :b:': -.~.' I-, , ..j.. ...., , ..... :: , ;. '~:~.,?.~,,~.~ ,.,,'~ ~er 43,319 70% :~enter 18,384 30% ir, :,.ddmon, almost 30,000 units, primarily con- dominiums, are held for seasonal use. $600 - 750 $400 - 600 37% $250 - 400 12% >$750 20% <S250 7% 15 Medical The primary provider 4' i[e.dtt- ~.'~.Te services tn Collier County is the NCH Healthcare System. This system includes ~he · Two locally-owned 4nd o!' Naples Commuim: Hosi.,c:.' Heart Surgeo: .: Norlh Colher Ho.s~. .al h,, :9, · Roughly 400physk:ans or; · Urgent Care Center: ~ocate .h,., I~okalee omp, cnensive hospitals: ?84 Acv.. Bedv. 24 ,~uh-acttte Bedv, a Psychiatric Center, an Open /nit. a ? ?uroscience Unit and a ('ontinumg ~'ducation ('enter tie Bet.. and a Women and Children's ('enter :ohou, ;']oilier County: Marco Island, Golden Gate, East Naples and · Wellness Center~ fc 'hea~ ~ !t:"'~, .... don an,, fitness · Cardiac Cath labs ar, d Mae ? :,( ,,..,nn~c :: Imaging (~) facilities · Comprehensive rehaOi · Daysurge~andtrc m::ent · Home Health Age~ c ',', se", '.,.: :iii' :ns ofCollier CounD', from Naples to Immokalee · workCare, the fir'.~ ~,ospi ~o%o, cd pm~¢am for workers' com~nsation patients, is approved by the State of FI,..~& and v .:~ ,,': r'.,xir, ,m discount of 10% offofsmndard rates, work(~re is desired to safeSy, "turn; ,r, * ,vod'ers ,-, .i~eir regular duties and quickly and e~ciently as ~ssible. 14 Quality of Life Collier County's cultural and recreational resources satisfy every taste: ' The PhJlharrnor~c Center for the Arts, opened in late 1989, includes concert hnlls and art galleries, a_nd serves as the home of the Nap[es-Marco Philha. n'non, c Orchestra and the Gulf Co xst home of the MJarni Ballet. It offers the full range of activities from opera to pops to Broadway plays and lectures. World class art galleries and outdoor art and craft shows · Thirty-eight miles of sandy beaches and famous shelling · ~lore than 46 golf courses; Number One in number of holes per capita · Boating and fishing in the Gulf. numerous bays and ca- nals. and the Ten Thousand Islands Shopping, from quaint villages to a major mall · Attractions include the Collier County Historical Museum, Frannie's Teddy Bear Museum and Jungle Larry's Zoo- logical Park The Tropicool Festival, an annual, we,..k .long celebration in May including the Taste of Collier and the Great Dock Canoe Race, attracting over I0,000 spectators each year Special events including the Swamp Buggy Races. Re- gattas, the Chili Cook-off. Seafood Festival, Indian Days, .Mullet Festival and many others National Championship girls' softball leagues and other organized sports programs for kids The Everglades City area is a must for those who want to discover the real Florida. A gateway to two national parks, the Everglades City area is rich in O!d Florida charm. Untouched by urban development, the atmosphere is se- rene and reminiscent of the earlier days in Florida history. It is also noted as one ofthe sport-fishing capitals of the world. i"o~ ;he environmentalist, eeo-tourism opportunities "-bound. Collier County is home to three state parks and t..,,n c.~tional parks. Slate Parks Collier Seminole State Park Delr,¢: Wiggins Pass State P. ecr.;at,on Area Fakaha(chee Strand State Pre~.e ';e ,u s,.~ or!merest: Cons:.rvancy Nature Center Corkscrew Swamp S~ctua~ (94 ! ) 394-3397 (941 ) 597-6196 (941) 695-4593 (941) 262-0304 (941) 657-3771 Nat!onal Parks Cypress National Prese~,e £¢er£~a,ies National Park (94 I) 263-3532 (941) 695-3311 Collier County has a lower crime rate than either the State or the Nation as a whole. In addition, cr/me rates in the County have been decreasing over the last several years Coilier County's relative price level index for 1995, wtu.::h measures the cost of living, was 103.68. This wa: ]c';¢er than both Broward and Dade Counties '.,.'~i,.? reported indexes at 104.93 and 106.78, re- ~;pe,;~.:' e. ly The most costly item was food (107.65) ,vit~.i ¢,e least costly item being apparel (95.60). ~O'.'~ e .c~Ort, ta Dept~rtm,,nt of Con,,erc e. .4pfd. 1996 15 4. ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION PROGRAM " ~ ~ iii I IIII II I IIII I IIIIIIIII II II I Economic Base Part One: The Economic Base Summary Coil/er County .. the Naple.i metropolitan statistical area (MSA) - is a rapidly growing Florida market. ~,e N:p!es e.c. or~o,.o? is driven by the impact of affluent retirees and seasona! residents who a.m. ,.;:..':, v:, ,:y w,~ ,,p¢,~:mg, upscale quality of life. Naples is located al,..n;~ Florida's southwcs, .Dull' .::,:tst t~,~fil t~',e completion of 1-75, this market was relatively ~solated. The county',.~ ecc,,:,:,-.'~,, ;5 cer~::::,.l¥ service oriented and seasonal, with production largely directed to serving the loca.' uprcale cc.,:,umer market. The Napl¢:s MSA b:,d a r,' ~,aent population base of 188,000 in 1995 and is widely recognized as a high grov:th market. Co~,cr (3,unty led the state of Florida during the last five years with a 4.0 percent .mr,:.? .iC'~w0' .'>., )'hr; growth rate was more than twice the state's and ovec four times the natio.:?.t r,,: L'bc .r'.'.:'rv "r:~rket. however, is relatively small. Naples is the 17th largest of Florida'~ 2" ; :' .... ~c.:: :,.:, ,:own the list in terms of absolute population growth, adding only 7500 nc..: :,~.:,ae,',< a fe~. '~:~ Naples MSA accounts for about 15 percent of the residents IMng in the four sc.u~hwe,;t Flo, ~,.~a MSAs. Collier County'= econon',.~ ~s almost entirely dependent upon net inmigration for population grow'th. 'lT~ose ag..:d 65 a' ,.! over are increasing at a five percent rate, as compared to less than four percent %r p'tq~e v,orkin~-.' a,;,~ and school age residents. Among the prime working age, the 40-54 age gq :.,. :) ,s .;.:en;~g~ ~;,~ .g a: over seven percent pe~ year pace. About one in four c.;~idents are over 65 :,.Id aec, ut one in :,~,~ is over 75. In Florida, the proportion of s~niors is less, .just 18.7 percent arc over 65. Naples attracts ~.~pper incc, cne residents and had a per capita personal income in 1994 of $30,900. This is O.~ ,bird bigbe.;t ;: .... ::apita income in the state and about 43 percent greater than both the state and ,at/o, ~ avera,:':-', lhe personal income comparisons are even more impressive when account is take, of the £,:.t mat private pensions and capital gains are not included in the income data. The la,'gest ::orate .. ve,'sonal income within the county is comprised of dividend.';, interest and rent. Over 46 cent,: ,,! .:,,er/dollar in personal income is derived from these kinds of property income. }.-/o~ida a,,erag,..: v,.~l.,; about half this proportion of investment income. On a per capita basis, this property income averages over $14,000, but is largely concentrated among the one Collier County Economic Diversity Program 1 Economic Base quarter of the residents that have retired. Wages, salaries, and proprietor's income account for just 42 percent of total income in conu'-agr to nearly 60 percent for Florida and 70 percent nationally. Transfer payments, primarily go',,en~ment retirement and medical payments, round out the remainder of personal income payments with 11.6 percent of the total. CoLlier County has proportionally more upper income households and fewer lower income households than the state or nation. The affluent can be found with the seniors as well as among the 35 to 55 year olds. Over eight l~erc::-:nt of households report incomes in excess of SI00,000 as compared to 4.6 percent for Florida. At the same time, Florida has nearly 40 percent more households with incomes of less than $15,000. Naples has some of Florida's most expensive housing and most of this housing is ne,,,,. More than half the housing stock has been built .qince 1980. The median home value was S121,000 in 1990 but the average was S172,000. Mor, thly rents averaged S500 in 1990. Consumer spending in Collier County in .recent years clearly reflects the market's unique demographics. Inmig~tion creates 'm enormous demand for. building materials and home fm'~is!~ings. Home related spending .o,.':n. prises 16 percent of retail sales, over 60 percent greater than He state. Clothing and deparm~;.o.t store sales run ten percent more than the state share and- sig-nificantly greater for small shops, Restaurant sales comprise only a slightly greater share of consumer spending. Visitors boost lodging receipts to more than two and a half times that of the tourist rich state. A lower portion of consumer spending suggests that residents are spending outside the local market. Medical care services are the most notable. Despite the disproportionately larger number of senior citizens, health care spending runs more than 20 percent below the state average. On the surface, there are many positive aspects of the Naples' economy. Naples is regularly among the top two or three Florida markets !n terms of employment growth. This is not likely to change. However, this job growth is almos, t entirely concentrated in services, retailing and financial services. Despite cyclical swings, consmaction is growing. Nonetheless, the MSA has a consistently high average annual unemployment rate. Manufacturing is small and largely unchanged. A closer examination surfaces some notable weaknesses and associated risks. Both the strengths and weaknesses reflect the market's history as a winter tourist destination and upper income retiree Collier County Economic Diversity Program 2 Economic Basa h'aven. Naples has other attributes that may be less obvious. It is relatively small and geographically isolated. This sug?¢sts lhat local production may be limited to .specific local needs and that many goods and services ,,All be provided from producers and venders flora outside the market. For Naples to sell local',, r;roduced goods elsewhere, they will need to cc. ncentrate on products where transportation cost.-, :u'e Iow relative to value. Services and retailing dominate tt, e Naples employment base. Services account for 36.3 percent of the work. force and is the large> ,:~, ',.,3r. Despite the large relative size, it is only abot~.t six percent greater than the share of Flon(i... -.'.::" .e sector. The real significance is that d'..~ io~'~gi,tg industry m-.&es up about 18 percent .'t' ,5::' ,e:'vice jobs, nearly three times that of Floe'ida'.; !odging industry. Retailing jobs in Co;!,,." C'ot, nty are 30 percent larger than the state. Finance, insurance and real estate is another large I,',.. '4 industry, but this sector is not as large as the dem,.,graphics and growth might otherwise sugge.,, x.~q:e, iesale trade employment is a noticeably smaller part of the co:,nomy. The distribution o! ?., ,.~. ,.. ,.,nly half as important as for the state and st0~ds in sharp contrast to the much larger reta;~. ,.-', :~r. Obviously, other markets are handling the d~stribution of goods into and throughout Cr, qi,...Zc.,.~nry. Cc.,',strucfion employment is a~,.;t~ ..- ,:ctor that is large. Almost 14, percent of the ,,vc, rkforce is in the building trades, very close t,", .'?,'.c'; times the state average. This large share imparts a great deal of cyclicality to the Naples eeo,, ,~r~,~.' Manufacturing is the least repJ~'5.,..,ed sector in the Naples economy. The 2,200 manufacturing jobs comprise.just three percen: .,( ,.'.h: local workforce. This compares to eight percent for Florida v.qd about 16 percent for the n:'r:,,r ~,VSat industry there is mostly serves the local o'.,:~strucufion ma,:ket and the f'u'ms are gee.~,~.;~.. small. Only about five percent of th= mm,ufac, ruring firms employ more than 50 worker. :~5 ~:':.: sectors where there are details, printing and publishing lead with about 700 jobs. Building ,. ~a;.~, :als, especially concrete, is the second largest. Transportation equipment has more than ter, .,'~, :cra of the manufacturing employment base. The boat building sector may be the leading some:: of :;ales to other markets. There is also a small fabricated metals and industrial equipment workf,','ce. The Economic Base Every local economy has a definable structure. This structure starts with what are called 'basic' industries, which provide the ev,:~c, mic engine for the area. Supporting the basic industries are secondary industries that supply things directly to the basic industries; and support businesses, like Collier County Economic Diversity Program 3 Economic Base supermarkets, ,.hat supply both the basic and secondary industries. Collectively, these industries comprise a community's economy. Collier County has a 'single point' economy: wealthy elderly retirees and seasonal residents and visitors. Fo,' all intents and purposes, they drive the o.,unry's economy. The majority of the county's economy, with the exception of the large agn. cultural segment and a very small manufacturit, g and business segment, is directly dependent ,an this base. This type of economy is highly dep~'~dent on population growth for economic growth. Collier's population has grown by 100,000 people over the last 15 years and is expected to gcow by an equally impressive, 100,000 people over the next 15 yea. rs. Thus the base industry - affluent retirees - is expected to expand. . * A g~c~ltur~ The Collier County portion of the Bureau of Economic Analysis report, Personal Income by Source ant! Earnings by Industry, provides some insight into understanding the scope of impact that Coltle~.'s ,.tr, ique population has on its economy. Taale 1 provides a breakout on all the personal income received in the county in 1994. Table 1 Collier County Personal Income by Major So,:rce - 1994 (O00s) Amount % Net Earnings by place of residence 52, ~02,356 42.2% Dividends, Interest and Rent 2,518,181 46.2% Transfer Payments (SSN cig) 631,973 11.6 Total Personal Income $5,452,519 100.0% Source: Regional Information Syxtem, US Bureau of Economic Analyzi$, 1996. Collier County Economic Diversity Program 4 Economic Base This table clearly illustrates the impact of investment tn. come on the county. Almost fifty-eight percent (57.8%) of all the personal income in the county t:i received from these sources. The $3.2 billion that comes into the local economy from invev, ment,~ :md transfer payments has the same positive economic impact on the local county that z, Sal. ur~l pl,mt would produce. By contrast, the county's other basic employer, agriculture, produced only 2.1 percent of all personal income in 1994. Total Personal Income Total personal income in Collier County has risen from $1.08 billion in 1980 to 55.:~5 billion in 1994. while per capita income rose from $12,298 in lgR.';.' t;, $30,906 in 1994. The county's per capita income is approximately 40 percent higher that, t}~e. 'J.$. as a whole, and reflects the high concentration of wealthy households. The growth in pe~ capita income during the 1980s outpaced the rate of inflation, but during the 1990s has grown at about the same rate. When total personal income is separated into its key components, it is easy to see the collective impact of the county's wealthy households. Table 2 Collier County Components or Total Personal Income 1970 Net Earnings I 55.0% Dividends, Interest and Rentl 36.5%! Transfer Payments I 8.5% 100.0% Source: R£1S/BEA. 1996 1980 ] 19¢0 48...0%1 41.5~ 39.0%1 42.4,z 13.8%] 11).1% 100.0%1 100.0% 1994 1994 i U.S. I Florida 42.2%1 67.3%1 57.8% 100.0%1 100.0%1 100.0% Table 2 illustrates the difference these wealthy households have on the economy. Net earnings from people (including proprietors) only made up 42.2 percent of total personal income, which is very low when compared to the U.S. as a whole, or ¢,,en Florida, which has a relatively high concentration of retirees. In addition, this table spotlights that much of the income is coming from investments, rather than transfer payments (like social secarity). With the decline in interest rates, investment income also declined slightly over this period, which produced the slight decline in the overall strength of this sector within the economy. Collier County Economic Diversity Program 5 Economic Bast Households An examination of the county's household patterns provides additional evidence of its base economy. As Table 3 illustrates, the county has more wealthy households than non-wealthy when compared to the state and country as a whole. Table 3 Collier County Household Wealth 1996 Household Wealth i Colller I Percent I U.S. I Florida ,Under S25,000 21,747 t 29% [" 37%1 34% 525.5o,ooo 6,070 .550-100,000 10,4391 1.~%[- ..... 15%1 16%' $ I00-250,000 8,96a I 9.5%, 23%t 25% i25°'5°°'°°° i 5-I,%! 11% Median Household Wealth , S 63.860 t S 63.680 fiource: Claritax, Inc., 1996. ~ [ The county's med/an household wealth was 55 percent greater than Horida's and 39 percent greater than the national median. A comparison of the county's age structure also spotlights the high concentration of elderly households in the county. Table 4 breaks out the county's households by age group and compares them to Florida and the U.S. Table 4 Collier County Household by Age or Householder in 1996 Collier I U.S. I Florida I Number I PercenL_l_Percent I Percent Total 76,022 ...... [ ,.Under 25 2,809 a%[ .... 5% 5% 25 to 45 22,590 t ...._3_0~oj_ 42% 36% 45 to 65 22,885 30-701 30% 39% 65 to 80 21,157 I __28':/o-'] 17%i 22% Over 80 t 5.581 7%1 6%i 7% Source: Claritas, Inc., 1996. J J j As Table 4 shows, 35 percent of the county's households are headed by someone over 65, versus 23 percent for the U.S. ant'/29 percent for Florida. Collier County Economic Diversity Program ' ' 6 Economic Base Table 5 displays house?,old income ranges, which are closer to the national average, although the percentage of househelcls within Collier County in the lowest income range is lower and the households in the highest range larger than the U.S. baseline. Table 5 Collier County Household by Income tn 1996 Totai 7~,022 ~ Under 325 "O.~ ~. 1._.5_~_7._ S_25-SO,OC& .......... s 5 o-___7.~./.~ ......... : .. ~ s75- 1007£__~_.. ; 5,933 Over s I ffj.ooo ! '7.692 Source: Cljrita$, /mr., 1996. ,Collier I U.S. I Florida Percent I Percent I Pement 100%1 100%1 100% 28%1 34%1 38% 36%1 32%t 3-1% 18%i 19%: 16% 8% I 8%' 6% 10%1 7%1 6% This combination of elderly, wealthy households have pulled all the median numbers up accordingly. The counL'y had the highest family median income in the state in 1995 at S48,800, and its median household income in 1996 ,,','as 538,776. This combination of elderly households with high incomes also translates into higher expenditure rates, which is why the county, had the highest median 'effective buying income' in the state in 1996 at 537,624. Table 6 Collier County Effective Buying Income (EBI) in 1995 Effective B,.,ying I rercentage of Households b Income I EBI Orou_p...~ . S 10-20,0C_)_'0__ __.! .... 1 !.7% S 20- 3_5/xX) .... .'. ........ 22.3% S35-50,000 ......... 20.3% Over S50.000 i 39.1% Source: Sales &Mark. etin~ Marua~entent . 1995. Note: Both the Effective buying Income and Sales Per Capita figures for the county may be affected by the high incidence of seasonal residents/visitors who flock to the county during the winter season (Novem~r. April) and swell the cour~ty's population by 30 percent or more. Thirty percent of the area's housing units are held for seasonal use, so the winter season obviously has a major impact on the county's economy. Collier County Economic Diversity Program 7 Ill IIII I III I II I I IIII I n ~ ~ ~ ~, Economic Base Businesses The county has no 'major employers' who are not directly related to serving t:s la.;..;e, affluent retiree, seasonal, and tourist population. With the exception of agriculture, there are no other basic industries nor were there any identified industry clusters found within the cou,ry. As Table 7 illustrates, small sized companies predominate. Companies wit?. icy, o' uhan tea employees make up 80 percent of all the companies in the county. Only thsee per:erie of all companies have more than 50 employees. Industry Ag'r'icultm'e ,Mining Construction .Manufacturing Transportation & Publir I k;litiefl Wholesale Trade Table 7 Collier County Business Size by Employment Number of Employees - 199._._.:3 _ . 1-9 10-49 50-249 ' Over 250 Total Employees Employees Employ:es En ~,Iovees 262 885 180 211 2291 27 71 2 7161 151 1291 a2 165i 42 2621 46 1,151[ 373 76~ I 109 311 Retail Trade * 1,616: Finance, Insurance & Real Es,ate 86, Serv/ces I 2,137 Unclassified I 74 1,761 I 292 711 3' 4; 2 __~ 1_.2 ..... 1 .... I? I 7a 10 Total: I 6,571 5,255 1,087 211 I 15 Percentage: I 100%1 80% 17% 3%! 0'7o: Source: Coum? Buxintss Patterns, 1996. The county also has a high percentage of working proprietors in its workfo,ce, which in 1994 made up almost twenty percent (19.8%) of the overall workforce, versus the la ;:,:r,;en,. o.~ state and national levels. This is another strong indicator of the county's small business orientation. Agriculture Agriculture was a major component of the county's economy. Citrus, vegetableq, ornamentals and beef carrie collectively accounted for $258 million in sties in FY 1995, with 302,704 acres in production. Unfortunately, due to structural changes in the international markerplac,:, a~cultural '' ' 8 Collier County Economic Diversity Program Economic Base sales have been on the decline since F~' 1990 ,,'hen there were S283 million in sales. With NAFrA opening American markets to Mexicav cege:ables and fruit, it is likely that the lower wage based portions of the agriculture industry will coofir, ue to decline. Table 8 illustrates these changes. Tab!¢ 8 Collier County Value of A~riculture Sales and Acres in Production Commodity Tomatoes . Cucumbers Watermelons Potatoes Green Beans Gladiolus Citrus Beef or Ca~¢ ~ 1994-95 I 19 0-91 ^:.'eaee ; Sales I Acreage Sales ; __~TN.o sl~l.5~).oooI ~ S ~560o0000 ' ',).,:,' '.~5373000001 2200 S 16500000 .5 ooo ooo I 25 500 95o_!3. t 500 ooo !~L_3oo Ornaments I 1.5.,,, To~s ! 302.704 257.656.07.~ I _89.-,~0 ' 282.904.000 ~ Collier Coura¥. U~ivee$im of Floeida Extension Services. 1995. S 3 ~-: 5 000 N/A S 750 000. S aa 404 000 S 2 500 000. 3 441 07-I I 230 53-1 S 4 975 000. 8,015,000 I 1.506, S 7,530,000 Employment Total private earnings ,,,,'/thin the county have risen from S519 rn/llion in 1980 to S2.3 billion in 1994. Separating private earnings by ;ndustry. into the percentage of total private earnings that each industry sector earns with,., t]q~ 'c: '. ,:o,;umy. can provide some insight into local economic activity. Table 9 illustrates these percentages and compares them with U.S. and Florida averages. Collier County Economic Diversity Program ~ 9 Economic Base Table 9 Collier County Private Earnings by Industry as a Percentage or All Earnings Bv lndustrv Construction Manufacturing Tr-,u-m/Communication & Public Utilitizs ~c~:~J c Trade + I ~ I Comparison - 1994 1970 19gO I 1990 1994 T u.s. I Flnrida ~ Trade , ~ 17.2%i 15.3'ol I$.6%I 9.7%1 Finance. Insurance & Real Estate ......, 19.3%~ 9.3%1 10.2%1 9.---~1 7.5%1 3.1% ~ 'i ,,t ~: 4 ,, I *, _~,:i~zl C,o,,emm~t "-.;' ' 8.6'cI 10.1%; 10.4'ol 10.3%1 16.2'o! ,o,=, -: ,oo.o o, ,oo.o o, ,oo.o%: t Source: Rerl'ona! Economic IM'ormahOn S~,;tem, Bureau o_/EconomicAnMyti$. 1996. As Table 9 shows, agriculture earnings make up a higher percentage of county earnings then national or state earnings. : : ,, Mm.n,:, only makes up a small portion of employment at all levels. Construction, which is a main,,."/ of the local economy is over twice U.S. and state levels. Manufacturing, Transportation/Communication/Public Utilities, and wholesale trade are ail fas below national and state level: Retail, Finance/Insurance/Real Estate, and services, reflecting CoLlier's unique economy are far above, and government was below state and national levels. Looking at earnings over time, a=m"iculrure has risen over time. Mining, following statewide trends has declined. Construction has declined over time, while manufacturing, T/C/P.U. and wholesale trade have remained relatively ,:o,tstant over dme. Retail trade and Finance/Insurance/Real Es,ate have also remained fairly constant, while services, reflecting the overall shift in thc national economy have grown significantly. Government has remained constant. Table 10 provides the breakout of employment by industry and tracks it by year from 1991 through 1994. As this table displays, overall employrnent grew from 72,645 in 1991 to 79,855 in 1995. This table also illustrates the dtp in employment in 1991 and 1992, as Collier County felt thc effects of the national recession. In 1991 the local unemployment rate hit 7.9 percent before peaking a~ 9.4 percent in 1992, and slowly declining as the economy recovered. The unemployment rate in 1995 was 6.8 percent which is still higher than the state's. Collier County Economic Diversity Pro.am ~ 10 Economic Base Table 10 ColHer County Employment by Year Industry 1991 1992 [ 199,3 I 1994 J 1995 [1991 to 1995 Construction 6,411 I i 71 I ~ 65 I 58 5.a 351 t3a' 5.657 I 6.317 6.92,I 7.2061 Manu/'actur[ng ..... 2,025 I 2 018 Tra. ns/Communk, ation & Public Utilitie: 1 914 ~ Whole~ale Trac:e I 650 1,7a2 I !.645 Fin~ce I~d,_;L~, ~nce & Real Estate ----t -. 4 512~ Services _ . ! ~ 20.71a I 22 102 C~vern. ment ~- 6.785 ~ Total ~72,a72 I 76,3al 795 113  323 7 29 2aa51 ~ 3 247 7.Baa I 1,059 1 913 I 790 a 670 23 115 7,562 78.218 79.854 I 7,208 Source: Flortda Deoartment of Labor a,..d As Table 9 illusu'ates, while thc county added 7,208 jobs in the five year period, nc.t all scclors grew equalI,, Overall the heaviest drop in employment over this period was in agriculture which lost 1,628 .job.;, while the county's population growth pushed up construction, retail, services, and government employment. Only 13 manufacturing jobs have been added in the last five years. Wi~n a nurr,~r of these overall industry sectors there were also changes. Within the agriculture sector, theft ,,.vas a big drop in jobs in crops, which was partially offset by increases in veterinary. and genera~ avimal services and landscapers. Within the Finance/lnsurance/Re..'fl Estate industr?'. depository ~m, tirutions lost jobs (as part of the ongoing industry consolidation) while security brokers, ~n>t~rance and real estate expanded. Within the services sector, hotels and consultants (architects, engineers, accountants & management) all lost jobs, while health care and business services ~e,~,. Reflecting the seasonal nature of the local economy, employment also rises and fills over the year. Average employment in 1995 peaked in December at 110 percent of the yearly average before dropping aown into the August summer low point when overall employment is at only 86 percent of the average. A~ciculture, retail trade and services are the sectors most subject to seasonal swings. Collier County Economic Diversity Pro.am I 1 Economic Base Monthly Employment One other note on er;~ployment: when comparing average salarie~ between Collier and Lee counties, the av.,'.,,~,~, wages paid across the employment spectrum are almost always higher in Collier County. 1992 Census of Business The 1992 Census or' Business also provides some insights into the county's economy. The census of b:~siness is tatceo every five years and provides general information on the types of business and their sales over ante. The 1992 business :.ensus found that the county's retail establishments, which grew from 892 estaNishments in 1',82 to 1,529 in 1992, had sales per capita of $I0,824 and an average payroll pm employee, of $12,735. Table l i show~ these figures. These sales and salary numbers were significantly higher than national, statewide, and even neighboring Lee County's numbers. (':oilier County Economic Diversity Program 12 Economic Base Table I1 Collier County Retail Service Statistics . 1992 Location Sales Per Capita Collier Florida ~S ~ United States I S 7.429 Percent of i Payroll Per i Percent or" Collier E m,~p,.l o v e e Collier I_~_.S, .L2.~7SS I ~9~--~. $ I I~903 '; 93'~o 81% s 69 7i--' ,2.,o8 Source: 1992 Census of Business · 1996. As this table reveals, the county's retail sales and payroll per employee exceed national levels. Within the wholesale trade sector, the county lags behind state and national averages. Table 12 Collier County Wholesale Trade Statistics . 1992 I Sales Per Percent of I Payroll Per Percent of Location Capita Collier $ Emptovee Collier Collier I S 3,314 Florida 9,832 I s 2~.5.43 103%1 S 24 86g 297% i S '~ ~4 ~, 384%~ S 29.017 115% 12-1% United States I S 12.741 135% Source: I992 Census of Business · 1996. I ; At Table 12 displays, the county's wholesale trade sector, much like Lee County's, primarily serves its own market. The county's service industry had higher receipts per capita than any of the other areas but had a lower payroll per employee than any of the other areas. Table 13 shows these numbers. Table 13 Collier County Service Industries . 1992 { Sales Per I Percent of Location J Cax, lta , Collier 'Collier ~ Lee 84% United States 80%1 Source: 1992 Census of Susines$ . 1996. J Payroll Per i Percent or Em£1ovee Collier ~.~_.. 18,0481 $ 21C9.17 J 115% ~ 2 3 .~'8'-[ 124% ~ ==~==~'=~'"~- 13 Collier County Economic Diversity Program Economic Base Tax Base Table 14 presents the percentage of' the overall assessed valuation by major use category and compares the county with the state, Lee County and Dural County, which have more traditional economies. Table 14 Collle. r County Percentage of Assessed Valuation by Land Use Type - 1994 ! ~'lorlda I Collier I Lee I Duval Residential t 66.0%2 17.? 'raj. ~ 54.3% Commercial ..... ~ 15.0%1 ..... 1'-0- ~';~'~ i ....... ~ 3.6%1 ~'6%t,i 12.4_...4~ 1o.o% Industrial 2.6%1 6.9%i A~cultu. r¢ i 1.7%[ 1. ,5 ?o t 0.6%'[ 0.3% lnstitutionm ] 2.7%~ .... ' ~*, ' ,_ -. ~'t 2.1%1 5.1% ,Miscellaneous J 11.0%1 7.3 %J 5.8%J 14.3% Source: BEBR. 1995 Statistical Abstract. J J As this table illustrates. Collier County's perce,tage of its overall assessed valuation within I residential uses is one of the highest in the state. The co mty s residential property owners pay a higher share of local property taxes than they do in other areas of the state. ~ ~ 14 Collier County Economic Diversity Program Economic Base Key Findings Rapid growth is inevitable. The county added 100,000 residents during the last 15 years and will add another 100,000 residents over the next 15 years. The county has a single point economy, one that is focused on meeting the needs of its affluent consumer market. Most of the county's businesses are small, and there are a larger number of sole proprietors. A major econorrfic problem is the seasonal nature of the local economy, which peaks a~ 115 percent of a~,erage employrnent in the busy ,,,.'inter season and falls by 30 percent to 85 percent of the average during the summer. The. market's relative small size (under 1 million people) suggests that key, locally consumed services and products will continue to be imported, since economies of scale will be difficult to achieve. The continued influx of high income retirees suggest that the construction, medical, serv/ces and retail sector will continue to grow. The county's geographically isolated location suggests that production for the nonlocal market will be limited, except for goods where transportation costs are Iow in relation to their value. The improved transportation links make the county more attractive for air and auto visitors, and easier to utilize goods and services produced elsewhere. The highly seasonal and service-oriented economy means the majority of fl~ture jobs in retail/services will be Iow-paying job opportunities that exist for only the winter tourist season. · Ag'ricultural products/food processing may be an overlooked opportunity. Collier County Economic Diversity Program ...... 15 Economic Asre.,sment Part Two: Economic Assessment Introduction The purpose of this section is to assess the county's e<Jsti, g economy in light of ongoing u-ends and changes in the overall US and Florida ".¢onomie.~. Fids vril~ ,.hen set the stage for establisi:ing what type ,of economic diversification ~rugt~m ,v;ll k:.st rncct the co,.,nty's needs. Summary of Part One Findings Rapid growth is inevitable. The county is projected to add 100,000 new residen:.:; over the next 15 years. The county has a 'single-point' economy, focused on meeting the needs of n.~ a/'f!uent consumer market. The local economy is highly seasonal. Average employment peaks at 115 average during the winter season then .lro~,' by 39 petcer~ to 85 percent o1' during the summer. The local economy is als'.) vulnerable to cyclical recession. Agriculture is in long-term decline. Most of the county's businesses are small and there, are a large numbc~ of ~ole proprietors. Many of these businesse.~ are vulnerable to national chains that m~. now moving into the county. The majority o~ ,he .fmu, c joba .'.re..~t¢4 in d~:: :tu're~t economy will be lov., seasonal retail and service jobs. Healthcare and construction should also grow. Trends in Florida's Economy The county is part ora larger state and national economy and changes in the larger level will 'affect the local economy. There are a number of ongoing economic treMs in the Florida economy ~at will affect Collier's economy. Collier County Economic Diversity Program ~ 1 Economic Assessment Solid Overall Growth · Still growing in absolute terms, but not at the boomtown 1980's rate. · Slowdown in the number of Americans retiring, until 2010. · Increase in the second home market. · Structure of population slowly shifting to working age. Defense Downsizing Will Slow · Major downsizing accomplished. · .~ocurement will slowly decline. Savings and Loan Effects Gone · Excess inventories absorbed/restructured. · Demand for space strong. · Return of speculative building. Shift to Service-Based Economy Will Condnue · Agriculture and textiles will decline (NAFTA). · Airlines/bankin~communications will continue to consolidate. · Growing global economy for value-added business services. · Smaller sized companies will predominate. · Manufacturing job growth will be slow through capitalization production techniques. · Exports will continue to rise. Across industry sectors, the following trends are likely to occur: Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing · Overall the number of jobs in agriculture will decline. · New jobs will be in veterinary, animal, and landscaping services. and value-added Mining Overall jobs will continue to decline. Construction · Will remain strong, but grow more slowly. Collier County Economic Diversity Program Economic Assessment Manufacturing · Greater investments in technology per employee will slow overall employment growth. · Durable goods should add most of the new.jobs. · Electronic equipment, instruments and related products, and printing and publishing arc expected to account for 60% of all new manufacturing jobs. Transportation, Communications and Public Utilities · Will remain strong but grow slowly. · New technologies are reducing employment demand. · Trucking will add the most new jobs. Wholesale and Retail Trade · One quarter of all new jobs will be in trade (primarily retail trade). · Wholesale trade employment will slow, as new computer ba',ed technologies reduce employment demand. Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate · Mergers ~,nd consolidations will slow overall employment growth. · Security and commodity brokers will be fastest growing segment. · Insurance will add the most newjobs. Services Fastest growing sector. Health and business services will be strongest. Social services will also gain. Government · Slow growth in employment. · Major growth will be in prisons. Florida lndu4try and Occupational Employment Projections 1994-2000. Bureau of Labor Market Information. Florida Department of Labor and Employment Projections. Collier County Economic Diversity Program 3 Economic Assessment National Business Trends General business trends, both overall and for specific industries will determine where companies locate, or re-locate in the future. Most companies in today's competitive environment must become low cost and high quality producers or service providers. 'I hcse business realities axe dictating the need for and pattern of corporate lc)cat/on activity. The 9'.zrwhelming force now motivating firms to relocate business operations is cost reduction/cont~,i,,rncnt. Often this involves maximizing efficiency, which can be difficult for many corporations in their exiting quarters. Companies also view relocation as a unique window of opportunity to introduce major change in their organizations. This can involve process re-engineering, flattening orgarfizational structures, introducing work teams, decentr:,h:'ing decision making, and even modifying corporate culture. It is frequently difficult to gain ma~.irnum mileage from such change in existing locations. Hence, many £wms will move both to take advantage of locafional cost savings and realize additional savings from fully implementing desired management changes. Other forces which are driving companies to geographically redeploy assets are: shedding non- core businesses; globalization; onerous state and local regulations; customer/vendor partnerships (industry clusters); difficulties rec'cuiting a quality work:force (despite the slow economy); the need to have maximum flexibility fo;' future growth; and new approaches required to successfully manage people who have a different set of priorities than their predecessors. Rapid advances in telecommunications has now made it possible to efficiently operate several small and more manageable operations as opposed to mega facilities.These advances have also allowed a number of industries to under'raJ,re substantial physical consolidation. This in turn has fueled relocation. This so called churning in American industry should persist well into the future. Additionally, there are many companies who are leaders in their industries that are searching for new capacity. This is occurring even in depressed industries. In siting new facilities however, even the growth fa'ms are striving for cost reductions. Collier County Economic Diversity Program 4 Economic Assessment Crucial Factors Human resource co,~.~de,utions ,iow dominate location selection criteria in the majority of industries. The pre-eot=m:..' .' hero:' ¢,:.:r these companies is the availability of a quality, workforce. Gauging whether an a.t: '...~: s~ti:¢y this r.:qairement involves the examination of related data, such as: labor force educa:. :.:,~;, 'v:ra~nrc,.-.r,: levels; the basic skills of production and clerical workers that can be recruited at d..,z ..'.,; ,9a,,.~,; targeted wage level; computer literacy of requisite workers; annual turnover ..rote., ,. :,., r,~,,--,I,:,, po,.,inons, daily absentee rates; work ethic and productivity. ratings by compm'a'..)lc e~'oot,: ~ :.,';, and, educational quality indicators. Most companies seek ?..'sa....,/here there is a minimum critical mass of requisite skilled and technical labor. Sometimes there :s '~' additional requirement for industry specific skills. Once a company, is ce',tMe,.:, that a .,-,.ffficient pool of quality labor is available, the next most important concern ¢.,":.?,r,e.', maJ,o:,~er costs. Firms are seeking locations characterized by moderate wage str,:,.., .~: '. ~r,d "-'",Fie. reserves of well qualified labor. In short, the goal is to achieve maximum val,.~¢ vt. c'.,ery human resource dollar expended. The paramount labo'c ,'c~.' ~.cn'.pone,,t is hourly wages or annual salaries for respective occupations. An incoming fh-m 2, m '~,. c:.~ce~v.'_.d with the average hire-in rate for the positions in question. Other prirne variables a...-'~ r:~.:.di~al in~,urance, other fringe benefits, workers' compensation, and workweek length. For high tech, corp:;r"ac ~eadquarters, and R&D companies the ability to attract and relocate professional talent ~o,:: :~rv'.~ ;~b,' ,:ountry is the most important criteria. This capability is often dictated by both an. e.re'.-: :;.~..xl.;t'/oi' life arid its public image. Pivotal quality of life concerns for today's transferees .~:'.'. ,~?£,~:dable hr:using, ~e quality of public education, spousal employment opportunities, corfu;rotc- d~.,,ar~ces, crime, recreational opportunities and the quality of the natural environment. These priorities ca~, also wclude the local presence of highly regarded technical and business universities. Excellent air service, preferably including nonstop connections and international flights, is generally high on the criteria list for these kinds of operations. After the human resource factors, the following locational determinants often surface as strongly influential: Collier County Economic Diversity Program 5 £conomit: Assessment Other business costs, such as electric power, occupancy and local taxes Domestic and international air service Available office and industrial space Telecommunications Sufficient infrastructural capacity, especially roads Intermodal mil and freight services Reasonable state regulations, especially environmental Fast permit ap!:'r~val process Air quality attainment State and local government incentives Absence of earthquake and destructive storm potential. Back Office and Financial Services A number of factors have conwibuted to slowing office location activity; specifically: lower occupancy costs at (or near) existing sites; excess office space capacity, creating diffic~.flt disposition; favorable la0.or supply surpluses, with low wage inflation pressures; lower sector earnings, creating clJfficulties justifying one-time relocation costs; and the more immed:ate commiu"nent of capital for equipment upgrades or new purchases. For back office location projects, the typical relocation objectives have focused on: management's desire for change in operations and/or delivery of services; access to higher quality labor, or the need for cost control. Under these scenarios, the critical location screening issues become labor and occupancy cost, labor supply and available skills, the selection of efficient buildings, telecommunications support and superior educational systems. Light Manufacturing and High Technology Location activity for high technology and light manufacturing is either pressure driven (need for cost reduction) or opportunity driven (expansion related). Industry sectors that are critically impacted by pressure driven factors include: Computer Manufacturing, Aerospace, Defense, and Biotechnology and Healthcare. Ail of these industries Collier County Economic Diversity Program 6 Economic Assessment have been downsizing for various reasons. Selected companies in this sector, however, should experience moderate growth with the emergence of new drugs, gr=ater operating cost efficiencies and growing foreign markets. Oppommity driven industries include: Computer Software and Servicing: Industry statistics show 50 percent of computer related revenues will derive from software sales and design. These f'urns are now s,~ccessfully pursuing global markets. Indusu-ial Electronics/Processing Automation: Computer integrated manufacturing will gain increasing importance within future product development. This trend will favor computerized numerical controls, robotics, electronic sub-assemblies, laser technology, optical scanning and software development. Fabricated Rubber Parts/Plastic Parts & Fabrication: Recycling programs continue to support various industry sectors. These firms include a diverse mix of small and large operations, suitable for virtually any size community. Telecommunications: Growth products include radio communication equipment, detection systems and all forms of wireless corm'nunication (computer networking, cellular phones). Market expansion is both domestic and international. Medical Equipment: Selected industry sectors are growing, particularly products that offer less invasive surgical procedures (e.g. laser surgical equipment). Food Processing: Industry trends are shifting from consolidation to modernization, with new plant construction expected. Positive influences on the p~ocessed food markets include higher household incomes, demand for health-related foods and new access to foreign markets. Many of the above industries will ultimately benefit from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), particularly those services and products that bring automation and high technology to Mexican business. Favored industries will include electronics, computer soft'.vare design, communications and scientific instruments. === ~ 7 Collier County Economic Diversity Program Ecol~ora[c A$$e$$rae~l Reta/] and Ser~ces The major structural changes now going on in the retail and personal services sector of the economy revolve around business franchising and the movement to large 'category ldller' stores. The rise of business franchising has been a rapidly growing phenomenon in America. Franchises now make up 30 percent vt' ~i! retail and personal services businesses with. in the U.S. and this is expected to rise to 50 p,:tc':.qt of all business over the next 20 years.The footloose nature of American society., combined with the franchise's inherent advantages in establishing a brand name, advertising, management and buying power, give this type of operation a distinct long-term advantage in the marketplace over local single store operators. The 'category killers', Home/Office Depot, Toy's R Us, Books-A-Million, Circuit City, etc. focus on one aspect of retail, then offer low price/high volume alternatives to local specialty stores. This trend, coupled with the rise in super-sized supermarkets, which have drugstores, banks, photo processing, flower stores and cud shops are all leading to an implosion of retail space into these big boxes (60-80,000 s f.). ti'.at typically do S200/s.f. in sales versus the S100/s.f. in sales at a traditional neighborhood shopping center. Collectively, these =ends are sounding the death knell for many small, independently owned businesses that cannot compete on price and are unable to compete on service or provide a specialty niche that the national chain stores cannot provide. ECONOMIC STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES The purpose of this section is to assess the county's economic strengths and weaknesses in light of general business requirements. While every business has different requirements, there are six major areas that drive business locational decisions: 1. Access to markets 2. Exisdng business mix 3. Labor ava/lability 4. Business costs 5. Ava/lability of building/sites 6. Quality of life Collier County Economic Diversity Pro.re'am 8 Economic Assessment The type of company determines which of these six key factors will have the most influence in business locational decisions. For e×a,nple, a large corporation doing business across the country will seek to locate near a major reglonal airport, llke Atlanta, Chicago or Denver, while companies that are regional in natu,',' v,'ill f,ollow a similar strategy, just a smaller scale. A good example is Merrill-Lynch, which ~' currently concentrating its 'back-office' functions in Jacksonville, which has an existing. ::,tong cluster of similar businesses, a large trained labor supply, reasonable qaality of life. ant :,,~.,:;t important to this type of busine.~s: lower labor and business c>sts than the Northeast. lt: ,.'orporate headquarters, on the other h~'.nd, is located in Princeton, NJ, where the high quality o~' life outweighs all other locational decisions. COLLIER COUNTY SCORECARD 1. Access to Markets Ce The county's remoteness is in many r ,0eot; part of its popularity in the exclusive residential real estate market. The. opening of ~,-7.~ o Fart Lauderdale and the expansion of the Regional l. ntemational Airport have improved .'.v .;ess -omewhat, but the county is still a long way from most major markets. Business travel, alth,:agh constantly improving, is still difficult and expensive. While some transportation savings car, ")e achieved d'trough backhauling, the county will remain a difficult market to operate from. 2. Existing Business blix Ce The county's current business mix is ;~redominantly small businesses almost totally focused on serving the local residential con~un',:r market, with little in the way of externally focused companies. While the local medical and qnance industries have some potential for forming industry clusters in the future, Collier county i'., local services oriented economy. 3. Labor Availability D Not only is the local labor force small hy regional standards, the vast majority of the county's employees are clustered in low skill/Iow wage occupations. The availability of a skilled worlcforce was cited by the county's CEO's as tN. county's biggest business problem at all levels. '== Collier Cot,,'.')' Economic Diversity Program 9 Economic Assessment Wages It is generally estimated that manpower costs account for approximately 70 percent of all business costs, so labor costs are an important component of ail business costs. As Table 1 di,'play:q in almost all the job specialties tracked by the I)eparvanent of Labor, wage rates are higher ;x,. C)')llier County than in neighboring Lee County. As:;uming a standard 40 hour work week, this wage differential ranges from one to three thousand dollars per year. '===== ~ ~ 10 Collier County Economic Diversity Program Economic Assessment Table I Collier County Comparison of Hourly Earnings - Lee and Collier Counties I995 __ Oc_c 9.q? lic. Collier County Office Accoun~ts Accoundn~ Cle.~k~. Administrative .AssistanL~ Customer Sera. ce Clerical Su~_~ Office M~agers __ Purc ha sin t_6_g.".n_~.~ ...... Receptionists ....... Secretaries Manufacturing Assemblers an0 FabrS,'.~to,s Lee County._. 11.68 8.82 11.50 8.13 N/A MedLan S 17.31 $ $ 9.50 S $ 9.88 S S 10.00 S S 11.49 $ 8.75 S 7.50 S 13.00 S i 2.25 S 12.12 S 11.53 S 7.96 S 7.00 S 9.45 S 9,02 6.25 N/A S Dr'afters S 13.00 NIA S 19.00 S 10.63 First-line Producfon Sur~4rvisor's Industrial Pr~uctJon Man__~ers Laborers and Material ~Mechanir;s .... Offset l~as O.Eg.E.p.t~_ .S~ R,'.c.~b'.~); 5"¢rk~ Stock Clerks Track Drivers V.qn2L.. ~ Drivers Finance ln. zo___ror_,_c2.t fi'e,'q Estate ~erator~ ~e,'~._.b_ Financial M~a~e~ Ps. Il & Tirnek¢__e..q3n. g Cierk$ ;ervice ...... Cashiers Cooks S 22.99 Hosts and Hostes~s $ 6.44 S 12.50 $ 16.25 S 6.00 S 11.19 1 !.00 S 12.50 S S 7.54 S 6.25 S 6.62 S 7.00 S 10.38 S 8.88 S 7.50 S 7.00 10.80 8.65 S 15.89 $ 17.31 S 14.99 N/A 19.80 S 20.83 10.30 $ 9.20 6.25 $ 5.88 $ 8.00 7.50 $ 6.50 S Hotel Desk Clerks ]_~ Janitors and Clec~e.,'s tS 7.2 6.24 6.50 6.00 7.50 S Medical Assist,ts S 10.00 ~ 8.83 ~red Nursez S 16.66 S 15.28 ~al Technicians S 16.00 S 12.50 ~Reted I S 6.00 S 5.50 Construction ~nt~rs S I1.25 S 11.00 18.75 S 17.19 Construction Managers Construction Worke~ S 7.69 N/A Electricians S 13.00 S ll.ll Brick Masons $ la.00 N/A Source: Florida Devartment ff Ernolovmtnt Securit,t. 1996. Collier County Economic Diversity Pro.am Economic Assessment 4. Business Costs C Business costs are the collective cost of employees, building costs, taxes, insurance, etc. that go into the making of the goods c~r ~ervices that a particular com~:.:,l r ;e!ls. Wki.le every company is conscious of its costs, thc fY1:' 'ff company now determines t, ~,,. c'rjcal this is to a business. For example, high volume, lq x, , duc. added manufacturers (VCR'.~ an; very. susceptible to these bix: of costs, while in high value added businesses (software) these ore '~ot a cfidcal component. Within the Southeast U.S. k,.:gio,, the county's business cost; ate highly competitive, and am cemainly less than those ,~ th.' rmdwest ;md nomheast. However', :here are other low cost lc>cations within Florida, including, unfortunately neighboring Lee County. In other business cost areas, such as power, utilities, solid was:e and local business and property taxes, Florida and Collier cot:.'~ty ~e relatively low cost in relatic;r, to other market areas across the count'. 5. Availability of Buildings/Sites D More than 80 percent of al~ -ew; expanding, consolidating or felt, caring businesses desire to move into an existing building '~,;'; ;'s '.,~fly natural. To gain permit .".0p~'ovals and build a new building can easily t.'~ke three year'., o ~t ~,; easy to understand why bu'i~,:.::;se~; look at existing buildings. This is especially critical in Ronda, v.'hich has a reputation for overlapping and complicated regulations. Although there are a fa~.r t;umbcr of Office and light indusm~, i)uildings available for rent/sale within the county, most of these a.re very small in size, and are. r~vt able to serve anyone but small companies. This lack of inventory certainly inhibits business exn~.nsion with the community.. In addition, the average monthly rents for office and industrial space within the county appear to be generally higher, by several d¢liars a square foot then ot~e~' markets in Florida, especially neighboring Lee County .~d~,',t, gh no complete inventory, of ~2,¢ county's office space market exists, a review of the coa,~t:, '_~ ;,,vailable space would place Cias:', A suburban office space rents in the low $20's range. Comparing the rent ranges for suburban level Class A office space, the county has higher rental rates than the other major Florida markets. ~ ~ 12 Collier County Economic Diversity Program Economic Table2 Collier Coun;~, ^veraRe Cost for Suburban Class A Orrk~ Space - 1996 - Market Cost/SF I I Mart, e~ I Cost/SF '~acksonville S West Palm S i 3 18 Sou.ce: Koll Real Estate Index.~ I 17 ~ I Denve~C_.i. 20l [ Ptttsbu.r~h 22 I $ 26 ?3 21 ' '". 21 'Esfimatexl f i I .... I Industrial rates are similarly higher. However, the county" rental rates are not high in comparison with other U.S. markets. 6. Quality of Life A The Naples MSA offers one of the highest quality of life :~,,.,Irot~,:cnts in the country, which is why the cour:r,/continues to be a world class residentwl and ,,;uc,-3m enclave. Quality of life is increasir~gl', ",".coming the major locational deterrvfinar~~ f ,r th, cno,,Jl:dge based industries of the 21st century Of major concerns for businesses are the quality of the ioc. at :,chords, the crime rate, natural and recreational resources, local infrastructure capacity (especi~Jlv ,'~ads), affordable housing and ease of business travel. Collier County scores very high in all these meaqures. Interviews with Local CEO's Ms. Parker Collier, a member of the Economic Advisory Council, interview~ over 50 chief executive offl,.:ers in a variety of businesses that represe:~: a :,.oo, cross-section of the county's business community. The results of this survey present a [ab':f clear picture of the problems and prospects of doing business within the county. The CEOs felt that "quality of life" is the major economic mccmt ,e for a business to operate in the county. They also felt that Naples is not for every bw.;ines", nor should it be. Other major points included: ~ ....... ~~=~=='~=~ 13 Collier County Economic Diversity Program Economic Assessment The local governments (both city and county) are not perceived to be business friendly. The Collier economy s}',t;uld be looked at geographically (east and west of US 41). The need to devetc~ ,?.'mmuter roads and affordable housing so that employees can locate within the co,.m~,~ ~,m less expensive areas). The lack of a high q,~,~ ~:y, trained labor force for the services industries. The lack of effecriw jo:.: training programs. The importance o; .::;Je .y.. security and political stability in supporting quality of life. The local busine:,s ,~,r,,~ ork is not very strong. The lack of infrasm~,;ture, especially roads. Collectively, these CEOs have focused on the key problems facing the business person who wishes to expand or locate there. The CEO's also stated that preser¢:ng the county's 'Quality of Life' was the most important thing the county could do to foster economic growth. Population Growth The county is projected to add 1<'.,(.".,000 new people over the next fifteen years. The type of people that will be. [Mng here will ha..,-: :,r, effect on the types of businesses that will opera:e within the county. The Bureau of Econor,,Sc i'r~d Business Research (BEBR) prov:des the state's long range population projections. Table ! ?:,wides those population projections as a percentage of total population. As this table illustrates, unlike the rest of Florida, BEBR expects the county's population to get older over time. Table 3 Collier County Population Age Structure . 1980-2005 l' t1980 Age 0.-19 I 26~ 20-54 { .._4_: :7!~' Over 55 I 33% Source: Bureau o( Economic 1990 I ~99s I 2000 ,13% 42%1 41%1 39%'~' 35% 3S%1 37%l 39%1 a~ B~d~$x Rexearch ~ Ra~e Ptoiectlo~. i995. The percentage of the population under 20 within the county is projected to remain fairly constant over time, while the state projects that the percentage of people over 55 will rise. This is in contrast to Florida as a whole, where :.he s;ate expects that senior citizens as a percentage of total population will decline slightly, as more working age households move to Florida. Collier County Economic Diversity Program 14 Economic Assessment Applying these project/ohs to Collier County, the county will still attract the wealthy, elderly households that are the basis of the county's economy. As Table 4 illustrates, when comparing Collier County to state and national averages, the local employment differences can be clearly seen. The county has a higher perceerage of its work:force in agricultural, construction, finance/insurance/real estate, retail and services, ~eflecung the residential consumer nature of the local market. ManufacturSng, transportation/communications/public utilities, wholesale trade, and government make up smaller percentages, whl. a is a reflection of the market's small size, whereby larger regions are supplying the county with gtxx:Is and services. Table 4 Collier County Non-Farm Employment 1994 US I Florida ~ Collier County A___m-ic ulture/Fore st/Fish Construction ~ l%J 2%1 !%1 .I 1% 5%[. 6%1 10% N~anufacmrins[ ~ommunication/Public Utilities ~ 13~%.~ 7%i 3% 5%~ 5% I 3.% Wholesale T 5%1 5'7ol 2% Retail I 17%-i' [~'~oT 22% Finance/Insurance/Real Estate I 8.7ol ~ 10% Ser,4ces I 30%[ .3~__.~ Government [ 15%1 i4--~ 8% I 100% 1 100% I 100% So_._.urct: REIS. 1996. I I ' l Changes in Employment When the county's employment shifts over time are examined, they provide some insight into the changing nature of the county's economy. Looking at the years 1991 through 1994, individual industry changes are outlined. Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing Suffering from the effects of NAFTA, this sector lost several thousand jobs, primarily seasonal farm workers. This job loss was offset by hundreds of new jobs being created in veterinary services (074), and landscaping (078). Agriculture is expected to continue to decline over time with the exception of its services component which will continue to grow. ~ 15 Collier County Economic Diversity Program Economic Assessment Manufacturing This sector remains flat, losing lots of jobs in the 1991 recession. Then slowly added them back. This sector wiJl only show modest job growth in the future, primarily focused on serving the local economy. Conslz'ucfion While co'~struction jobs overall keep growing, the county lost jobs in the bener paying heavy construction (16) sector during this period. This may have been the result of external competition. This sector will continue to grow as the county grows. Transportation, Communications & Public Utilities Employment in this sector n:mained relatively fiat over time, while modest job growth across the sector was offset by job losses in transportation (41 & 42). The transportation job losses will probably continue as more efficient supply systems become the norm. The public utiLities area (49) also lost some jobs, which are a natural out growth of increased computerization. Wholesal: Trade This sector saw modest growth over the period, although u-adc in a number of areas lost jobs. Again, this appears to be the result of store consolidation in the retail industry, and of businesses growing ability to provide goods from other areas. This area is also expected to only grow slightly in the future. Retail Trade This sector added almost 3,000 jobs over the time period. However, even within this sector there were job losses, which would reflect national trends of larger, less labor intensive stores (Home Depot, Circuit City, etc.) replacing smaller local businesses. These trends will continue, although population grovah continue to create retail jobs. ' "16 Collier County Economic Diversity Program Economic Assessment Finance, Insurance and Real Estate This sector only saw modest growth during this period. Whilc insurance and mai estate grew, thc finance sector saw the loss of over 300 jobs and the bank consolidations continued. This pattern wiU continue into the future. The county would also seem to be a prime target for financial and brokerage services, but job growth within this area has been very modest. Services While the services industry added almost 2,000 jobs during the period, a number of sub-sectors performed differently. The biggest gain was in healthcare (80), which added over 800 jobs. The biggest loser was hotels/motels whic',~ shed 816jobs during the same time period, largely through management efficiencies. Of partic;,lar concern were the job losses in engineering, accounting research and management (87) where, the county lost 400 high paying jobs. These job losses would also seem to be an indicator that larger outside companies are now beginning to successfully compete in the CoLlier market. Population growth will continue to fuel job growth in this sector. Healthcare should continue to lead in job creation. 17 Collier County Economic Diversity Program Program Deve;opment Part Three: Program Developme,~t Introduction The purpose of this section is tc, utilize the information developed in the aqaly~;~s xez,'iz., ..; ,~.~ report to fashion an effective .:,.'ganizafional response. To do this we will :l,ift ~o~. -. .... .! .r:: identification to program devel.~?ment. Summary of Part Two Findings · The county's basic econom~ - affluent retirees, seasonal visitors and tou~,,'~ - will co.~rinu,: grow; although the count) '.rill grow slightly older as the existing re:&!en~.:' age. · The county can expect to attract 100,000 new residents over the next fifteev years. · The size of this growth has the potential to create serious growth m-tr,,~g,~,.'nent probie,'c,~ ~r the county that could dama~;,~, the county's image as a select residenfiat · The county's small busine.~.s community is being adversely affected b? ~ational that can now enter the Naples market area. · Under current trends the c~:,,nty will continue to lose many small busit~c:,se: axed ',~,ell jobs, replacing them with i,3w paying, no benefit, seasonal employment ie r,,-r~l and ~.-..!vi · A survey of the county'~ CEO's found that the lack of a well traine,'~ la,~r force ',.,,; becoming an impediment to providing the business service levels that ace ~. Naples' ra-ademo~k. · Health care will be the strongest growing sector of the local economy a:.,d offer:, me the opportunity to establish a key industry cluster and improve the quality of care availa~',l.' to the county's residents. Collier County -C0n6mic ive'rsity ' ' Program Development Thc county is not a business location for all comp;~rucs, nor should it be. However there are a number of county residents who would like to mt '.,e the;r small, prestigious companies to thc county, yet are unable to do so for a variety of re.a.,on$ Future Prognosis Thc future prognosis for the county's basic economy ;¥.;,ear'; s.rrong. The U.S. economy is healthy and will centinue to grow, although it will still be s~$:'~,:' ~, · ~c~..:al national recession. Florida will continue to see slxong, real growth and will add mor~ ;.'.' ,:.,~' ~ ,,~'c thc coming years then any other state in the country. Collier County is also expect, e( :, '.-~. stxer,g continued growth in its basic economy over ~:c next 15 years, as it adds anot~c; ~$0,000 permanent residents and perhaps another 30,000 seasonal residents. The county's strong growth sectors will continue to be retail and services, which have Iow wage and benefit structures. The hospitality, construction .',nd :L~- coedical sectors will also grow. Why Economic Diversification? There are a variety of reasons why communities engage t," economic diversification. They include: enhancing property values, reducing residential ptc,~,..-.a;' rmxcs, recession-proofing the local economy, incre~!ng local business and year-round c:nplo?~ent opportunities for their residents, attracting new bu;inesses, or some combination ,cc ~I ::' t:;-..r, reasons. Because each community is different, eat:: ;~as its own community goals, .:,= ~..c':; t;.'-._: :.,.~ own strengths and weaknesses from an econorxic diversification standpoint; to be succ,~ssful, each community must develop its own custom-tailored strategy. How? There arc two basic rules for successful economic diversification: Rule One: Build on your strengths; and Rule Two: Minimize your weaknesses. Collier County Economic Diversity Program 2 Program Development Economic Strengths and Weaknesses When seen from a economic diversification viewpoint, every comm,,nzty l':a: strengths and weaknesses..Some are readily apparent, some are not so noticeable, ar,~ so,',:':. ~.t'c only of interest to particular companies, because businesses look at a community through ,i'~eir o,,vr., perspective. Thc Naples area has a number of positive economic strengths beyond its b~e econotny of affluent residents. Thc county's st~perior quality of life is an immense adva,.:~.~,.."., e. gcci-,~.iy since high technology' bt,';inesses, that are opportunity driven and high value 0tl,~:c~! ~:~ ,':'~, a'ole to locate their compar~ies in almost any location within the U.S. The county ha;: ,.,gl-..c.,-v,.,:'ate employee transfer acceptance level, a strong hospital network, excellent local ..::h:.~c'.s ~,d public services. and a Iow ,.'rime rate. All of these make the county an extremely attractive location for companies that want to attract high caliber employees. A member of the Council of Economic Advisors conducted detailed individual interviews with 50 of the county's CEOs. The respondents felt that the county's quality of life was the single most important reason why a company would desire to locate here. Collier County is a small sized metropolitan market (under a million l:eople) and ix also relatively remote from a transportation point of view. While this remoteness ha:, :~etr)ed protect the county's high quality of life, it effectively prevents the county from attracting any large businesses. The lack of a trained work:force was cited by the county's CEOs as the single greatest problem for local businesses. With few available buildings and sites, the county'.: ~ai estate community also has difficulty meeting thc needs of many businesses, because the vast .,'najo~ity of companies looking at an area want to move into an existing location. Companies are also concerned about the existing business mix of an area. increasingly, companies are beginning to actively seek to cluster together within regions or s~ecifi¢ :ocations. These companies have discovered the advantages of the synergy that can bo develop'gal by clustering, which includes sharing ideas, drawing from a talented employee base, joint v-.ntis, res, and research and development. Collier County presently has no identified industry clust:x',: to build upon. For some companies the 'cost of doing business' is their primary concern. These companies are affected by the collective cost of payroll, rents, taxes, utilities and shipping costs. These companies can find any number of more attractive locations within Florida, including neighboring Lee Collier County Economic Diversity Program 3 Program Development County. The county also suffers from a perception that it has a poor business climate. As the county's CEOs also noted, the county is not the location for all businesses. This assessment allows us to develop a profile of the type of companies that have a good fit with the county. Essentially, the kinds of companies that will be attracted to the county will be small, progressive, high technology oriented, non-polluting, value-added businesses that are primarily concerned with providing a high quality environment as an inducement to attract and retain a high quality work.force. Program Development The development of a diversification program first requires that some overall goals be established to guide the program. To be successful, these goals must support the community's 'vision' of itself and reflect on the kind of community that its residents wish to leave for their grandchildren. The residents of Collier County generally share the same vision: To maintain and enhance the Naples' world-class quality of life. To achieve this vision of the future suggests a number of goals for the economic diversification program: (1) Enhance Property Values through a value added public investment program. (2) Develop a World Class Medical Center that attracts both practitioners and cueffng edge medical technology. (3) Create Economic Opportunities for County Residents through small business assistance and customized job training. (4) Diversity the Local Economy to enable residents to establish/expand their businesses in the county. 4 Collier County Economic Diversity Program Program Development Enhance the Tourism Program by expanding into ecotourism in the (summer) off-season. While these may at fa-st glance appear to be disparate goals, they are all critically interrelated within the context of the Naples' economy. (I) Enhancing Property Values Maintaining property values is one of the primary purposes of local government and is certainly a legitimate governmental concern. The long-term strength of the county's basic industry - the overlapping combination of affluent retirees, seasonal residents, and tourism - is directly dependent on maintaining a high quality of life environment. In the long run, preserving the county's quality of lit'e is the single most important thing that the county can do for the local economy. Enhancing property values requires that the county adopt a value added, investment oriented growth management program. This strategy includes acquiring and preserving the county's extensive natural resources, adopting high quality urban design and landscaping standards, fully funding road and storm drainage programs, providing high quality public service levels and having top flight schools. In conjunction with this effort the county should adopt a strategy to shift its general business and manufacturing facilities east of the interstate. (2) Develop a World Class Medical Center With the large concentration of senior citizens within the region and the high quality of life within the community, the superior locally based medical industry of Collier County has the potential to attract top flight medical practitioners and medically-related high technology and research facilities. The medical technologies sector is one of the most rapidly growing sectors of the world economy. Expanding this sector would increase the level of medical services available to the county's residents, as well as diversify and strengthen the local economy. The medical sector offers the greatest potential within tl'e county to grow into an industry cluster. Collier County Economic Diversity Program 5 Program Development Action Plan While the county is new to economic diversification, it can draw on the lessons le2med from successful economic diversification programs across Florida and the nation to develop a custom- tailored, cost effective program to achieve the county's diversification goals. The recommended Action Plan has five interrelated components: (1) Auopt a Sound Growth Management Program. The county government will need to take a strong role in adopting and ~'unding a value-added capital improvements program, especially for roads, drainage and natural resource preservation; maintaining high public service levels and strong design standards, and working with the education community to ensure that the county's schools are the best in' Florida. (2) Form a Strong Public/Private Partnership. The county will need to join with the local business community to create a single organizational structure to support the overall diversification efforts. The exisnng EDC can form the basis for this partnership, but it will need to be augmented to handle the additional duties it will be undertaking. This combined organization should enter into the ongoing re~onal and statewide economic diversification efforts, and will need to be supported through county funding, as it is in all other Florida communities. (3) Improve the Business Climate. There are a number of actions that the county can take to improve the business climate. These include: forming a CEO roundtable to provide a forum for the county to hear local business concerns; publishing a 'Guide to Local Permitting' handbook to assist local businesses with regulations; streamlining the development review process (currently the number two business incentive in the country); forming an economic diversification rapid response technical assistance team; and providing and maintaining a detailed socioeconomic information database on the county. '" Collier County Economic Diversity Program 7 Implementation Part Four: Implementation Introduction Once a community decides that it will enter into the economic development business, it will quickly discover that there are many other communities also doing the same thing, both across the country and throughout Florida. The county can thus take advantage of the successful lessons learned by these communities in thc development of its own program. Businesses always seek locations which have stable government, socioeconomic, and business climates. Success in expanding existing business and employment opportunities is very dependent upon local economic diversification related organizations presenting a unified front. A community that cooperates to the point of having an effective network of agencies, working in concert and demonstrating preparedness will be successful. It is the intent of this plan to identify a structure for successful organizational networking and cooperative effort for Collier County. Wh/le the Economic Development Council of Collier County Inc. (EDC), through its initiatives, competes tbr the attention of a number of external industry and trade groups, the Council understands that its chief responsibility as a member of a public/private partnership with the county and the education community is to assist in the "orderly, progressive creation of buslne~ expansion and employment opportunities for the residents of Collier County." Successful organizations are those that focus on their primary organizational goals. The following program and organizational structure has been developed to allow the county to achieve its shared diversification goals. Opportunity The county is facing a new, and rapidly changing business environment, one that will challenge traditional methods for expanding economic opportunity. Not only is the field of economic diversification becoming more competitive among communities (there are 2,600 economic diversification agencies in the U.S.); but other factors outside the county's control, such as those brought on by rapid technological change, are poised to impact the community in the future. It is Collier County Economic Diversity Program 1 Irrtvlementation within, and because of this new atmosphere of rapid cultural change, economic uncertainty, and increased competition for businesses, that opportunities exist. Despite the competition, there is also increased cooperation among economic diversification agencies within Florida, starting at the State level. Enterprise Florida ~s the new state level public/ private economic development organization that has just replaced the Depa~'tment of Commerce. Through its regional offices, it will now serve as both a central cleating house for businesses looking at the state; and it will also help raise venture capital fm Ioc,] et, trepreneurs. Regional cooperation among counties has also become the norm across the state, as local county organizatio.s pool scarce resources to achieve more efficient results. The state's universities and community colleges are also expanding their business and technical training opportunities, as is the local school system through its vo-tech programs. The passage of the .rob Training Partnership Act, which merged a number of federal employment programs into a single block grant, now gives local job training agencies mueb rr~ore flexibility in designing successful local programs. This means that the education industry will be much better organized to meet the county's needs for well trained employees. The opportunities can be used to good advantage if the county and its various partners unite to achieve their common aims. ACTION PLAN Step One . Create a strong public/private organizational structure. Recommendations: A. Strengthen the existing organizational structure through a strong Public/Private Partnership. It is commonplace to f'md local economic development, or related organizations, enga~ng in 'tuff protection,' to the detriment of the greater good of the community. For economic diversification goaJs and objecrlves to be realized, a high degree of coordination and a breakdown of tuff protection must occur. This is the critical ingredient in successfi.fl economic diversification programs. Collier County Economic Diversity Program 2 Implementation Collier County and its municipalities have a number of agencies and organizations involved in overlapping areas of economic diversification. A mechanism should be developed to ensure a greater degree of coordination, so that all agencies are pulling in the same direction ar the same time. Individual organizations need not lose their identity or purpose to become part of an economic development team, however, teamwork requires organization, coordination, and cooperation. Success in the field of business expansion and diversification is also often dependent upon the local economic development organizations relations with their local governments. In order to create an environment which fosters cooperation and a preparedness to assist local businesses, the EDC and the Board of County Commissioners must develop a committed partnership in coordination with their education institutions, with defined roles for each parmer. This will require the merging of the county's Council of Economic Advisors with the EDC into a single uml:weL!a organizational structure. The staff of the EDC and the county's internal planning and economic diversification staff will also need to work closely together through a joint yearly work program. The Cha/.rman of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners or his or her designee from the Commission should serve on the Board of the Economic Development Council of Collier County, Inc. (EDC). The City of Naples, the university, the community college, the school district and the county's major chambers and tourism boards should also be represented on the board. Th. rough this expanded board, the EDC would become the single point of contact and focus for the county's collective economic diversification efforts. The increased communication and coordination that this type of framework will provide will enable the county to focus and streamline its collective efforts. B. Designate both EDC and county stair to form lhe Collier County RapEd Response Team. The Ford Test Track expansion project displayed the need for the county to have in place an organizational mechanism whereby the pannership can quickly come together and organize local resource, r co address or resolve large scale, important economic diversification issues. The members of the team, depending on the type of project or issue should include: the county manager (for selected projects) and the director(s) of: utilities, transportation, permitting, planning, fin: Collier County Economic Diversity Program 3 Implementation marshals office; representatives from the water management district (for new building), HR$ - health depmunent (septic tank), DEP (when local and project specific, i.e. air or water quality), Department of Transportation (if on a state road), the president of the EDC (for selected projects) and vice president for business retention and expansion (relocation). The Rapid Response Team must be able to meet on short notice with clients requiring technical assistance. The EDC would be responsible for determining the need to assemble the team. C. Create a Business and Education Roundtable. The most difficult aspect of maintaining a viable economic development effort is keeping all thc parties interested, involved, and in partnership with the overall effort. Communications flow must be maintained. Frequent, if not regular meetings of professional staff of area economic diversification or related organizations are necessar7. It is envisioned that anendees of the roundtable will use this opportunity, to coordinate, exchange data and collaborate on projects and programs supportive of creating econom/c opportunities in Collier County. It is recommended that the roundtable establish a regular bimonthly meeting at which topics of mutual interest are discussed. These meetings are an excellent forum for bringing in experts, from the llst of technical assistance organizations, or outside agencies, to educate and stimulate members. The Chairman of the EDC will appoint a board member as Vice Chair for the EDC's Roundtable. A representative of each educational institutional and a representative of each industry, sector (SIC code and the state's targeted industry list) fi.om ~,ong the business community should be appointed to the Roundtable. The purpose of this group will be to develop effective training programs which meet business and industry needs, and to raise issues of concerns to local business people. D. Improve the Business Climate. The issue that a county or city is not 'business friendly' is more often than not a perception problem. However, a county should always be concerned when its local business community ra/ses these issues. All too often small businesses, especially, run into trouble while trying to negotiate their way through complex governmental regulatory processes. Collier County Economic Diversity Program 4 Implementation Communities that have addressed this le~timate business concern have found that the preparation of an understandable 'guide to the local permitting process' that educates local businesses on the bow's and why's of the local permit process in order to alert local business people to what permits are required and how to quickly and easily obtain any necessary permits, is a solid start to improving the perception that a community is business friendly. Along with the preparation of the 'guide,' the county should also conduct an internal audit and focus group discussions with its customers to ensure that the regulatory and development approval process is '~s streamlined as possible. The old adage that 'time is money' is still relevant in the regulatory field. Communities have always found that it is not the regulations themselves that concern businesses, but the time involved in getting the pen'nit. While f'mancial assistance tops the list of most often asked for business incentives, fast-tracked permitting assistance is now the number two most asked for business 'incentive' in the country. Yet a streamlined permitting system is a management improvement that does not cost the county any money to implement. To oversee the county's internal economic diversification support efforts, the county should designate an employee of the Community Development Services Division as a local 'ombudsman.' This staff 1,:vel person would serve as a direct link to the business community and coordinate staff efforts with the EDC. The individual should be thoroughly familiar with local development regulations, review procedures, permitting licensing, etc. This position would also provide a needed linkage with individual existing businesses to help determine business/government related problems and serve as a conduit to district commissioners on problems that may need to be handled by the elected officials or county agencies. This function should also provide a critical link to local chambers of commerce and other business organizations. Collectively, this effort will ensure that le~fimate business concerns are assessed and addressed by the county. Collier County Economic Diversity Program Program Development (3) Create Economic Opportunities for Local Residents The current economy will continue to create a number of Iow paying, Iow benefit, cyclical and seasonal (busy during the season, laid off during the off season) jobs in the retail trade and services industry. Thc lack of business and employment opportunities in other sectors uld. mately hurts the local business community's ability to attract the quality labor force that is necessary provide the high business service levels that are the Naples' trademark. To achieve d'fis goal will require the county to emulate its neighbors and implement comprehensive small business assistance and customized job training programs in partnership with the local business and education communities. These programs are designed to help local residents prosper as well as ensure that the county can maintain a high quality work. force. (4) Diversify the Local Economy Diversification can help to both recession-proof the local economy and shift the tax base away from residential to non-residential uses, which typically pay far more in local property taxes then they requ~ ia public services. ColLier County should not expect to be home to any major industries, nor should it seek to attract them, but it is an ideal location for those residents that wish to locate their high value added small business near their homes. The Im. mokalee area, with its upgraded a2q:~rt and business park, offers a high quality location for locating new businesses to the area. The 1-75 interchanges also offer excellent locations for new corporate office park development. Implementing th. is program will require a public/private partnership with the local business and real estate community to ensure that there are available sites and buildings for new companies. (5) Enhance the Tourism Program The county's highly successful tourism program focuses on the county's world class resort facilities located west of US 41. Unfortunately, the seasonal nature of this program leaves these facilities and their employees underutilized during the summer. The fastest growing sector of the international tourism market is in ecotourism, of which the county, with the Everglades National Park and its other large nature preserves is ideally suited to serve. 'Because this market is not seasonally driven azd often occurs in the summer, when families and Europeans travel, it is a natural complement to the county's existing tourism development program. 6 Collier County Economic Diversity Program Implementation Step Two - Help the county's small businesses expand. Recommendations: A. Create a business retention and expansion office within the EDC. Because the vast majority of the county's businesses are small, the major focus of the county's cLiver~Lfica:ion program should be on small business assistance. This assistance would include: Developing a financial assistance and incentive packaging pro.eram which can be made available to existing and new business proje:ts. To be competitive, the fo!lov,'ing should be included: SBA 504 and 7a loans, conventional bank financing, taxable bonds, venture capir, al opportunities. ~ransporta~ion trust fund, tec,hnoto_~'y transfer program, and qualified target indus~-y tax refund program. Developing a labor training package for existing business expansions and new businesses that includes: quick response training, workforce development funds, vocational education business and indus:E,.' training, and other federal and state funds available for training. B. Develop a Small Business Development Center The cei~ter would be developed both to provide technical assistance and an incubator for small and minority owned businesses. A combination of partnerships should be developed for this initiative. Partners should include: the Economic Development Council, Collier County Florida Gulf Coast University University, Edison Community College, Worlcforce Development Board, Small Business Administration, and Enterprise Florida. Services to be provided would include: a library and computer center for the use by small businesses in the development of business plans, marketing plans, financial and accounting, etc. Space would be made available to small and disadvantaged businesses for a limit~ tL,'ne and a nominal cost which would include the sharing of common business applications such as accounting, secretarial and receptionist services. Identification of local products which could be matched to local buyers in CoLlier County and within the region would be made. Ongoing seminars for small businesses would also be conducted. .... Collier' County Economic Diversity Program 6 Implementation Step Three. Work to create a world class medical center. Recommendations: Develop a research driven targeted recruitment program. Working with the area's healthcare providers, develop a business recruitment program targeted toward medically and medically related industries, including medium to high technology related companies. Prepare industry specific data packages to support this effort. B. Persuade companies from specifically targeted medically related industries to locate their business facilities in Collier County. Conduct three recrui~ent initiatives per year to targeted markets. These marketing missions will target specific companies that have been found to be compatible with Collier County's available land and building product as well as business climate. Whenever possible, the targeted industry should match with Enterprise Florida's targeted industries. Participate with the International Trade and Economic Development Partnership of Enterprise Florida in two trade shows per year. Individual calls should be established around the trade show. Conduct one to two Reverse Investment Missions per year. These missions should be in conjunction with Enterprise Florida Trade Shows with one on one calls developed around the show. C. Expand employment opportunities for local residents. Working v.'ith the county's educational institutions, inc!:ding ',.he new university, develop both degree and customized job training programs specifically targeted to the needs of medically related industries. Whenever practicable, the county should also focus the small business start-up and business incubator programs on this specific market. Step Four . Help residents locate their businesses within the county. One of the dramatic ch~ges occurring with the shift in the world economy to knowledge.based industries is that many of these companies are now 'foot-loose,' meaning they can locate based on quality of Life. Thus it is not surprising that many of the county's residents whose businesses are located elsewhere have expressed an interest in locating in Collier County. Collier County Economic Diversity Program Implementation Recommendations: A. Develop a targeted business recruitment program. Conduct an annual fam~arization tour of Collier County to showcase the county. Familiarization tours should be conducted for:. local business owners and CEOs, whose businesses ar~ located elsewhere, representatives of Enterprise Florida, and representatives of national site facilitators. IdentLfy former representatives of corporations/businesses that have retired to ColLier County, and enlist their assistance in iden6fying companies to target for recruitment. Identify owners or CEOs of corporations which currently have second homes in Naples and develop a marketing program designed to create expansions or relocations from this initiative. Step Five . Implement the program. R ecomrnendation~ : A. Provide the additional staffand resources necessary to support the effort. Create a professional organization through the development of internal procedures for management and delivery of services, and professional staff development. Develop a computerized land and building inventory. Conduct workshops with Realtors and developers to enlarge the land and building data base. Develop a computerized project management system. This system will detail the process utilized by the Council's staff in prospect response and diversification pre)jeer management. Require all professional staff of both the public and private partnership involved in the parmer~hip to at'tend the Basic Economic Development Course, and where appropriate the Economic Development Institute. At'tend and participate in Florida Economic Development Council meetings and workshops. Participate in the Industrial Development Research Council. Maintain working relationships with Enterprise Florida and its various parmerships. Develop a computerized tracking system to be used in preparation of a monthly report of activities and results achieved, as measured against annual goals developed for each activity identified in the annual action plan. The monthly reporting should be designed to create cumulative monthly totals resulting in the Council's annual report. This report should be used as an accountability tool for the Parmership. Promote Collier Counry through the development of collateral informational material, including: an appropriate demo~aphic atlas, which can be easily updated on a bi-yearly basis; a cus:omize, d promotional packages for prospects that call and request information on Collier Count.,.'. A Collier County E~:0nomic Diversity Program ...... 8 Implementation Business Ombudsman This position can only be successfully performed by a staff position within the county. This individual would be tasked with preparing the business guide as well as spearheading a county- wide regulatory streamlining self-evaluation. This individual would also serve as the county's contact man with local businesses and provide staff support to the county's technical assistance rapid response team. Business Incubator County's have traditionally been the driving force behind business incubators, dJrect/y seeking private sector professionals, to operate the incubator, while funding the program through the Community Development Block Grant Program (C"DBG). The county will become eligible to receive these federal CDBG funds in approximately tl'u'ee years: and at that time can decide whether to directly operate this program or contract it to the EDC. Small Business Assistance The private sector is better suited to handle this assignment. This task has three major components: business retention, assisting'local businesses that are being forced to relocate or hav~g ~ouble; business expansion, helping the local business community expand and diversify; and assisting county residents start-up successful business endeavors. The completion of this task requires the assistance of the local education and financial communities, and the EDC is best equipped to undertake this task. This task will require two additional professional level employees. Assisting Local Residents Relocate Their Businesses to the County The EDC is the organization that is better suited to handle this assignment. This task includes assisting local residents, whose high value added businesses have a good fit with the county, or will help revitalize the Immokalee area, find suitable locations and an adequate labor supply within the county. This task will also include worldng directly with the area's public and private education and tra/ning providers to develop customized job training programs for the county's residents, who are seeking to improve their situations. This task will require an additional professional level employee. Collier County Economic Diversity Program 10 Implementation The World Class Medical Initiative Th. is highly important task will require a highly focused, cooperative effort between the county's mexlical community, the county, the education community and the EDC. This will involve developing a list of practitioners and medically related companies that can strengthen the local economy and improve local rmdical care. Then the initiative will need to actively recruit these companies both dimcdy and through corporate site facilitators. Freed from other dudes through county staffs assumption of technical support tasks, the existing EDC staff can focus on this highly important endeavor. Maintaining the Naples Class Standard Quality of Lire The county, because it represents both residents and businesses, is the only entity that can carry out this highly critical assignment. Maintaining the county's quality of life under the pressure of 100,000 new year-round residen:s and 30,000 additional seasonal will place a tremendous burden on the county and its municipalities. The county should conduct a thorough, internal self examination of its growth management, natural resources, design standards and capital improvement programs. The purpose of this self review is to develop a value added invesn'nent program for the county that will support and enhance the Naples world class standard quality of life. The whole Naples economy is based on its quality of life. Budgeting The county and the EDC v,,Lll need to develop specific funding requirements, although the county can project matching the public sectors contribution to the EDC, in addition to its own expand internal. The county will also need additional staff for this effort. The county should fund this additional effort out of general revenues, until the county becomes a participant in the federally funded CDBG program, at which time this prolvam can be utilized to support a significant portion of this effort. Because the state requires a local match for a number of its business assistance program the county should also support this effort directly during the interim until the CDBG program comes on line. Collier County Economic Diversity Program I 1 5.SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Table of Contents Regional Economic Information System, Bureau of Economic Analysis Personal Income by Major Source and Earnings by Industry Regional Economic Profile Full and Part Time Employees by Major Industry Transfer Payments Farm Income and Expenses 1992 Ctnsus of Business 1992 Economic Census Profile Geographic Area Series Comparison of Data Tables 1993 County Business Patterns · ColLier County Report 1996 Claritas Household Information 1990 Household by Age/Income Report 1996 Household by Age/Income Report 200I (projected) Household by Age/Income Report 1996 Household Wealth Estimates Comparison of Data Tables Employment Deta~ed Employment by Year 1991-I994 Employment by Year 1991-1995 Comparison of Data Tables 1990 Census Community Profile Series Collier County 4 n\ Collier County Economic Development Priyate Earnings By Industry (000's) 1970 1980 1990 By Industry: Agncu1~.'re/Forest;,y/Fi~ling $ 4,253 $ 15,940 $ 66,554 Mining $ 1,220 $ 14,997 $ 4,716 Coercion $ 24,490 $ 89,488 $ 259,912 Manufacturing $ 2,688 $ 17,414 $ 66,961 Trar~port./CommunicJ13ublic U31;'0e$ $ 5,036 $ 23,014 $ 59,267 Wholesale Trade $ 5,709 $ 25,691 $ 61,658 Re~ilTrade $ 20,719 $ 89,298 $ 271,796 Finance/ir~anceJReal Estate $ 23,779 $ 48,078 $ 182,249 Sauces S 24,752 $142,582 S 620,661 Government $ 10,573 $ 52,529 $ 185~810 To~a;: $ 123,21g $ 519,031 $ 1,779,584 Source: Regional Eco~ormc Info-nation System, Bureau of EconomJc Analysis. 199~ Comparision 1994 US Florida 96,703 5,421 270,263 82.642 69,727 81,390 361,542 225,002 885,594 239,390 $ 2,317,$74 Private Earnings By IndUstry as a Percentage of Ali Earnings 1970 1980 1990 1994 By Industry: Agnct~r e/F or asia/Fishing 3.5% 3.1% 3.7% 4.2% Mining 1.0% 2.9% 0.3% 0,2% C o ns~.'ucl:lon 19.9% 17.2% 14.6% 11.7% Manufacl;unng 2.2% 3.4% 3.8% 3,6% TransportJComrnuc~c./Pub/~c U~e$ 4.1% 4.4% 3.3% 3,0% Wholesale Trade 4.6% 4.9% 3.5% 3.5% Reta,J Trade 16.8% 17.2% 15.3% 15.6% ~nanceAnsurance/Real Estate 19.3% 9.3% 10.2% 9,7% Sauces 20.1% 27.5% 34.9% 38.2% Government 8.6% 10.1% 10.4% 10.3% Total: 100.0% 100,0% 100.0% $curce Regional Econcm~c Infocrnancn System. Bureau ~f Econo~n~c AnalysJ$. 26804000 2068437 36349000 296900 2.18E+08 10756365 7.47E*08 17475332 2.73E+08 12170366 2.55E-08 11814645 392E+08 22166731 3.03E+08 14763571 1.13E+09 61239463 6.55E+08 30038555 4.03E+09 1.83E*08 CompaHsion. 1994 U.S. Florida 0.7% 1.1% 0.9% 0.2% 5.4% 5.9% 18.5% 9.6% 6.8% 6.7% 6.3% 6 5% 9.7% 12.1% 7.5% 8.1% 27.9% 33.5% 16.2% 16.4% 100.0% 100 0% 100 0% Pa~e I 1992 Economic Census Profile: Retail, Wholesale, Service Collier County, FL Table i - General Statistics by Sector Number Sales or Annual of Receipts Payroll Sector Year Estabs ($millton) ($mlllion) Number of Employees Collier County, FL Retail Trade 1992 1,529 1,783 1987 1,236 1,133 1982 892 663 Wholesale £rade 1992 296 545 1987 214 346 1982 125 179 Service Industries ** 1992 1,785 972 1987 1,261 522 1982 843 215 .0 225.1 17,610 .1 139.3 13,328 .1 79.0 9,078 8 47.2 2,192 6 25.3 1,378 0 12.6 1,163 9 353.2 18,639 4 189.2 12,608 6 81.5 6,500 FLORIDA Retail Trade 1992 87,653 118,741.8 1987 83,808 87,925.6 1982 66,892 54,539.7 Wholesale Trade 1992 30,137 132,562.2 1987 25,636 97,360.0 1982 19,537 65,614.6 Service Industries ** 1992 119,962 74,34~.2 1987 98,713 45,530.9 1982 68,723 21,542.0 13,276.0 10,297.0 6,398.2 7,485.1 5,554.7 3,562.0 27,658.2 16,909.6 8,082.0 1,102,279 1,022,862 754,014 280,916 261,765 211,639 1,273,956 974,746 600,749 Table 2 - Selected Ratios by Sector Year Population 1992 164,729 1987 127,921 1982 99,902 -Retail Wholesale ........ Services Sales Payroll Sales Payroll Recelp=s per per per per per Capita Employee Capita Employee Capita ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) Collier County, FL 10,824.1 12,784.8 3,313.6 21,542.9 5,906.2 8,857.6 10,451.5 2,709.3 18,364.3 4,083.5 6,637.9 8,704.0 1,791.3 10,846.1 2,157.7 Payroll per Employee ($) 18,948.1 15,006.8 12,536.2 FLORIDA 1992 13,482,716 8,807.0 12,044.1 9,832.0 26,645.3 5,514.3 1987 11,997,282 7,328.8 10,066.9 8,115.2 21,220.0 3,795.1 1982 10,471,405 5,208.4 8,485.6 6,266.1 16,830.6 2,057.2 [See explanatory notes at end of Table 6B] [For Transportation, Communications, Utilities, Financial, and Real Estate Industries, See Tables 7 and 8.] Source: 1992 Economic Census 21,710.5 17,347.7 13,453.1 Insurance, 1992 Economic Census Profile: Retail, Wholesale, Service Collier County, FL ~_ Table 3 - Top Places in Collier County, FL in terms of 1992 population --- Retail Wholesale Services-- Popu- Number Number Number lation of Sales of Sales of Rcpts Geo Area Name (1992) Estabs ($mil) Estabs ($mil) Es:abs ($mil) Naples 20,431 747* 761 95 104 856* 48 Balance of county 144,298 782* 1,022 201, 442 929* 48 * The reports and databases include more Kind-of-Business detail for this area Table 4 - Percent Change in Employment and Sales from Prior Census Years 1987 - 1992 1982 - 1987 Retail .......... Wholesale .... Number of' ' Number of Sales Employees Sales Employees Collier Count~, FL 57.36 32.13 57.50 59.07 70.87 46.82 93.67 18.49 .... Service** .... Number of Receipts Employees 86.25 47.83 142.33 93.97 1987 - 1992 1982 - 1987 FLORIDA 35'.05 7.76 36.16 7.32 61.21 35.66 48.38 23.68 63.29 30.70 111.36 62.26 1992 Economic Census Profile: Retail, Wholesale, Service Collier County, FL Table SA- Sales by Kind of Business - 1992: Collier County, FL l---Top Place--: : ....... County ....... ~ :-State: Naples Collier County FL ~ of Sales # of > Kind of Business < Estab ($mil) Estab Retail Trade 747 761.0 1,529 Bldg Materials & Etc 19 20.5 67 Gen Mdse S~ores 9 (D) 17 Food Stores 67 133.4 152 Auto Dealers 25 76.8 82 Gas Stations 28 47.4 59 Apparel & Accessories 136 95.6 223 Furniture &Misc 92 88.3 193 Eating & Drinking 155 92.9 371 Drug Stores 21 36.6 37 Misc Retail 195 (D) 328 Wholesale Trade 95 104.0 296 Merchant Wholesalers 87 75.7 267 Other Whclesa!ers 8 28.3 29 ! Count Sales KB Sls Sale by KB pot of Sales % o ($mll) sctr(1) (Sm!l) Stat 1,783.0 100.0 118,741.8 1. 114.3 6.4 5,524.0 2. 193.7 10.9 14,096.7 1. 354.8 19.9 21,195.2 1. 307.3 17.2 30,029.4 1. 97.1 5.4 7,463.1 1. 140.2 7.9 6,506.1 2. 174.3 9.8 6,148.4 2. 194.7 10.9 12,110.6 1. 77.6 4.4 5,057.2 1. 129.1 7.2 10,611.2 1.. 545.8 100.0 132,562.2 0.. 479.7 87.9 81,848.2 0.~ 66.2 12.1 50,714.0 0.[ Table 5B- Sales by Kind of Business - 1992: , Collier County, FL .---Top Place--: : ....... County ....... : :-State: Naples Collier County FL # of Sales # of > Kind of Business < Estab ($mil) Estab Service Indust. ** 856 487.4 1,785 Hotels, Motels, Etc. 23 (D) 53 Personal Services 88 15.3 189 Business Services 148 94.9 342 Auto Repair & Garages 26 8.2 121 Misc Repair Services 28 4.7 96 Amusements 48 40.1 119 Health Services ** 240 158.7 380 Legal Services 89 41.3 147 Social Services 15 6.5 50 Professional Services' 139 47.8 260 [See explanatory notes at end of Table 6BI Source: 1992 Economic Census. Sales KB by KB pot of Sales ($mil) sc~r(1) ($mll) 972.9 100.0 74,347.2 213.7 22.0 6,244.9 30.4 3.1 2,339.7 172.4 17.7 13,765.2 33.5 3.4 4,473.5 16.4 1.7 1,944.7 78.4 8.1 6,185.3 239.6 24.6 23,306.6 69.7 7.2 5,394.0 14.3 1.5 824.7 99.9 10.3 9,074.8 County Sales % of State 1.3 3 4 i 3 I 3 0 7 0 8 I 3 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.1 1992 Economic Census Profile: Retail, Wholesale, Service Collier County, FL Table 6A- Sales by Kind of Business - 1987: Collier County, FL ~---Top Place--~ ~ County ..... > Kind of Business Naples Collier County Sales KB Sls % Chg # of Sales # of by F~B pct of in Sls Estab ($mtl) Estab ($mll) sctr{1) 92/87 Retail Trade 653 589.8 1,236 1,133.1 Bldg Materials & Etc 20 16.1 58 64.9 Gen Mdse Stores 10 86.0 19 109.5 Food Stores 73 120.8 153 248.5 Auto Dealers 36 93.6 88 231.0 Gas S~atio~.s 33 33.1 60 56.7 Apparel & Accessories 132 57.1 177 73.6 Furniture &Misc 76 47.5 160 107.8 Eating & Drinking 113 58.8 253 116.2 Drug Stores 18 25.7 33 45.8 Mlsc Retail 142 51.2 235 79.2 Wholesale Trade 79 71.7 214 346.6 Merchant Wholesalers 68 54.1 189 231.1 Other Wholesalers 11 17.7 25 115.4 Sales (Sm!l) 100.0 57.4 $7,925.{ 5.7 76.2 4,699.2 9.7 76.9 9,911.! 21.9 42.8 17,001.7 20.4 33.0 22,447.7 5.0 71.1 5,528.6 6.5 90.6 4,002.6 9.5 6!.7 4,676.5 10.3 67.5 9,087.9 4.0 69.6 3,323.8 7.0 63.0 7,246.6 100.0 57.5 97,360.0 66.7 107.5 59,629.3 33.3 -42.7 37,730.7 Table 6B- Sales by Kind of Business - 1987: Collier County, FL :---Top Place--: ' County ...... Naples # of Kind of Business < Estab ' ' Collier County Sales ($mil) # of Estab Sales KB $1s % Chg by KB pct of in Sls ($mil) sctr(1) 92/87 Service Indust. ** 699 283.1 1,261 522.4 Hotels, Motels, Etc. 29 90.5 57 164.4 Auto Repair & Garages 25 7.2 87 24.7 Amusements 39 17.1 98 41.8 Health Services ** 183 75.6 246 102.4 Legal Services 76 21.0 122 37.2 , .-State FL Sales ($mil) 100.0 86.3 45,530.9 31.5 30.0 4,474.6 4.7 35.3 3,230.5 8.0 87.5 3,757.6 19.6 134.0 12,901.0 7.1 87.3 3,697.5 (D) - Withheld to avoid disclosing operations of individual companies. ESTABS - Establishments. SALES - value of sales (retail/wholesale), or service for establs with paid employees. See the reports for other definitions. 1/ The PERCENT of SALES (RECEIPTS) for the SECTOR by the KIND OF BUSINESS ** Services includes only taxable estab$. Census-to-census comparisons are affected by coverage of hospitals, scme cther services. Private hospitals are included in 1987, excluded in 1982. ~ 1992 Economic Census Profile: Collier County, FL Ail Manufacturing 20 Food & Kindred 21 Tobacco 22 Textiles 23 Apparel 24 Lumber/Wood Prods 25 Furniture 26 Paper & Board 27 Print/Publish 28 Chemicals 29 Petroleum 30 Rubber/Plastics 31 Lea=her 32 Clay/Glass/Ceramic 33 Primary Metals 34 Fabricated Metals 35 Machines/Computer 36 Electro/Electronic 37 Transp Equipment 38 Instruments 39 Misc Manufactures No of Estabs 177 Manufactures Estabs Employees Val Added Shipments Emp>20 (000) ($mil) ($mil) 19 2.2 107.4 188.0 47 4 0.6 45.1 58.9 18 2 0.3 14.9 33.3 15 2 0.5 15.7 33.7 Empl as % of: State US,by Ail mfg SIC 100.0 0.5 27.3 13.6 1.] 22.7 1.~ FLORIDA 1992 Economic Census Profile: Manufactures No of Estabs Employees Va1 Added Shipments Estabs Emp>20 (000) ($mil) ($mil) All Manufacturing 16382 20 Food & Kindred 703 21 Tobacco 20 22 Textiles 154 23 Apparel 1251 24 Lumber/Wood Prods 1265 25 Furniture 810 26 Paper & Board 183 27 Print/Publish 3415 28 Chemicals 498 29 Petroleum 53 30 Rubber/Plastics 634 31 Leather 64 32 Clay/Glass/Ceramic 957 33 Primary Metals 124 34 Fabricated Metals 1331 35 Machines/Computer 1553 36 Electro/Electronic 764 37 Transp Equipment 873 38 Instruments 534 39 Misc Manufactures 905 3758 472.4 32,634.4 64,274.7 260 41.5 4,423.4 11,716.5 7 0.9 44.7 93.6 43 ' ' 4.3 161.3 321.0 354 33.6 1,003.3 1,936.2 229 19.0 861.8 2,102.7 155 13.1 537.9 1,028.3 97 14.2 1,299.8 3,339.7 426 56.0 3,573.2 5,136.1 149 20.2 2,768.7 6,667.6 13 1.1 132.5 310.0 207 19.0 962.9 1,954.2 17 2.1 101.8 175.3 238 17.7 1,074.7 2,284.5 41 4.6 250.1 740.3 349 30.4 1,527.7 3,417.2 316 29.0 1,726.6 3,170.3 291 57.9 4,968.3 7,595.5 199 36.4 3,186.2 6,099.9 155 43.0 3,586.9 5,363.9 105 9.4 442.6 821.8 Empl as % of: US Ail mfg 100.0 8.8 0.2 0.9 7.1 4.0 2.8 3.0 11.9 4.3 0.2 4.0 0.4 3.7 1.0 6.4 6.1 12.3 7.7 9.1 2.0 1992 Economic Census Profile: Collier County, FL Table 9 - Firms and Receipts by Group ..... All Firms Minority-Owned, Women-Owned Firms Receipts Group Number ($mil.) Firms with Employees ---~ N~mbe: Receipts of Number ($mil.) Employee~ Ail firms Black-Own,.d firms 18,748 2,900.0 3,715 2,359.0 24,72~ 202 10.6 59 8.1 13: Women-Owned firms 6,553 666.5 1,286 535.6 6,974 1~92 Economic Census Profile: Table 10 - Comparison Ratios: Group All firms Black-Ow-ned firms Minority-Owned, Women-Owned Firms Collier County, FL Percent of County, Percent of Group in State --- All Firms ........ Firms with Employees ..... Receipts )>>> <<< Receipts >>> <¢ Employees Percent of County 100.0 0.4 Pct of Pct of 'Pct of Payroll Group in Percent Group in Group per State of Cnty State in ST employee 1.7 100.0 1.6 1.6 17,190 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.6 14,053 Women-Owned firms 23.0 1.7 22.7 1.6 1.6 14,030 1992 Economic Census--Retail Trade Geographic Area Series Geography: Collier County, FL SiC and Descrlpticn Number of estab- lishments Sales ($1,000) Number of employees 52 521,3 525 526 527 53 531 531 533 539 54 541 542 546 543-5,9 55ex.554 551 552 553 555-7,9 554 56 561 562,3 562 563 565 566 564,9 57 5712 5713,4,9 572 573 58 5812 5812 pt. 5812 pt. 5812 pt. 58!2 pt. 5813 591 59ex.591 592 593 594 5941 5942 5944 5943,5-9 Re%ail Trade Building ma=rl & garden supp. Building materials and supp. Hardware stores Rtl nurser!es/lawn & garden Mfg (mobile) home dealers General merchandise stores Dept store (incl leased dept) Dept store (excl leased dept) Variety stores Misc. general merchandise Food stores Grocery stores Meat and fish market Retail bakeries O~her fccd stores Automotive dealers New & used car dealers Used car dealers Auto and home supply stores Misc automotive dealers Gasoline service stations Apparel and accessory stores Men's & boy's clothing & acc. Women's clothing/specialty Women's clothing Women's accessory & specialt Family clothing stores . ' Shoe stores Other apparel & accessory Furniture and homefurnishings Furniture stores Hcmefurnishings stores Household appliance stores Radio/TV/computer/music store Eating and drinking places Eating places Restaurants Cafeterias Refresb~ent places Other eating places Drinking places Drug and proprietary stores Miscellaneous retail stores Liquor stores Used merchandise stores Misc shopping goods stores Sporting goods & bike shops Book stores Jewelry stores Other misc shopping goods 1,529 67 39 15 11 2 17 9 9 4 4 152 112 5 11 24 82 14 · 10 33 25 59 223 22 114 93 21 25 34 28 193 74 79 11 29 371 356 221 3 104 28 15 37 328 14 33 167 29 14 44 8O 1,783,047 114,307 88,260 15,940 (D) (D) 193,660 143,374 139,089 3,987 50,584 354,849 342,449 1,533 1,723 9,144 307,324 255,007 7,313 17,599 27,405 97,059 140,193 10,234 60,026 5!,548 8,478 42,246 18,578 9,109 174,286 85,972 54,965 11,187 22,162 194,659 191,728 134,500 (D) 48,320 (D) 2,931 77,604 129,106 12,816 7,526 64,868 11,332 6,941 23,919 22,676 17,610 780 189 20-99 0-19 1,250 (NA) 1,130 42 78 3,428 3,242 11 53 122 876 529 41 157 149 442 1,548 120 768 654 114 330 192 138 1,196 569 417 59 151 6,245 6,173 4,209 20-99 1,719 100-249 72 454 1,391 78 108 656 9O 82 182 302 596 598 5992 5993 5994 5995 5999 Nonstore retailers Fuel dealers Florists Tobacco stores and stands News dealers & newsstands Op%lcal goods stores Misc retail stores, n.e.c. ],6 2 28 4 0 12 52 11,524 (D) 6,910 2,588 0 4,972 (D) 141 0-19 132 ! 62 100-249 1992 Economic Census--Wholesale Trade Geographic Area Series Geography: Collier County, FL SIC and Descrlp:icn Number of estab- lishments Sales ($1,000) ' N~mber of ' employees Wholesale %fade, total Merchan~ wholesalers 50 Durable goods Merchan= wholesalers 501 Motor vehicles & parts & supplies Merchant wholesalers 502 F~rniture and homefurnishings Merchant wholesalers 503 Lumber&other construction materls Merchant wholesalers 504 Professiona!&ccmmercia! equip&sup Merchant wholesalers 505 Metals &minerals,except petroleum Merchant wholesalers 506 E!ec~rlcai gccds Merchant wholesalers 507 Hardwre,&plumbng&heatng eqp&splys Merchant wholesalers 508 Machinery, equipment, & supplies Merchant wholesalers 509 Miscellaneous durable goods Merchant wholesalers 51 Nondurable gcods Merchant wholesalers 511 Paper and paper products Merchant wholesalers 512 Drugs,prprietries,&drugsts'sundrs Merchant wholesalers . 513 Apparel, piece goods, and notions Merchant wholesalers 514 Groceries and related products Merchant wholesalers 515 Farm-product raw materials Merchant wholesalers 516 Chemicals and allied products Merchant wholesalers 517 Petrc!eum and petroleum products Merchant wholesalers 518 Beer,wine,&dstilld alchlic bevrgs Merchant wnolesa!ers 519 Misce!!anecus nondurable goods Merchant wholesalers 296 267 173 158 29 28 22 19 17 16 24 23 5 4 12 12 22 20 · 27 25 15 11 123 109 7 7 4 4 10 9 47 40 0 0 9 9 15 15 1 1 3O 24 545,847 479,697 198,816 173,751 28,368 (D) 18,563 15,564 19,864 (D) 18,054 (D) 7,762 (D) 20,533 20,533 21,206 (D) 47,943 (D) 16,523 4,739 347,031 305,946 3,576 3,576 1,441 1,441 4,420 (D) 217,956 182,667 0 0 4,708 4,708 31,727 31,727 (D) (D) (D) (D) 2,192 2,091 932 891 !43 100-249 129 124 73 20-99 142 100-249 33 20-99 64 64 85 20-99 214 100-249 49 27 1,260 1,200 34 34 11 11 19 0-19 950 912 0 0 20 20 55 55 20-99 20-99 100-249 100-249 1992 Economic Census--Service Geographic Area Series Geography: Collier County, FL SiC 70 ex 704 7011 7011 pt. 7011 pt. 702,3 72 721 7211 7213 7215 7216 7217 7218 72i2,9 722 723,4 723 724 725 726 729 73 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 7371,2,3 7374,5,6 7377,8,9 738 75 751 752 753 7532 7538 7533,4,6,7,9 754 76 762 7622 7623,9 763 764 78,79,84 781,2 Industries: and Descriptlcn Total (taxable) Hotels,houses,camps,otb Hotels and motels Hotels Motel,motor hote!,cts Other lodging places Personal services Laundry,cleanlng,garm Power laund,fam/comm, Linen supply* Coin-oper laund/drycl Dryclean plt,ex rug* Carpet/upho!st clean Industrial launderers Otb laundry,clean,gar Photo s~udios,por:rait Beauty and barber shop Beauty shops Barber shops Shoe repair shop,shine Funeral serv/crema=ory Misc personal services Business services Advertising Adjust,collect,credit Mail,coDy,photo,steno Serv to dwellings,bldg Misc equip rent/lease Personnel supply serv Comp prog,process,oth Comp prcg,prepk soft~ Data processing serv Comp rent/lease,maint Misc business serv Auto repair,serv,park Auto rent/lease,w/o dr Automobile parking Automotive repair shop Top,body,uphol,paint Gert automotive repair Otb automotive reDair Auto serv, ex repair e~a_. services Electrical repair shop Ra~io,TV repair shops Other e!ec rep shops Wa=ch,clock,Jewe!ry rp Reuphcl/furniture rep M!sc repair,tel serv ~musement/rec services Mction picture service Firms Subject to Federal Income Tax Number of estab- lishments Receipts ($1,000) Number of employees 1,785 53 44 26 18 9 189 54 0 1 17 15 15 1 5 2 110 110 0 2 3 18 342 15 6 34 80 30 29 24 16 3 5 124 121 8 0 83 20 45 18 30 96 24 7 17 4 18 50 119 6 972,923 213,725 210,076 190,816 19,260 3,649 30,412 9,519 0 (D) 1,306 4,094 1,837 (D) (D) (D) 14,764 14,764 0 (D) (D) (D) 172,394 4,497 1,922 10,465 12,454 15,993 35,365 31,059 29,617 (D) 60,639 33,476 3,227 0 23,316 5,419 12,874 5,023 6,933 16,393 5,419 799 4,620 2,143 8,346 78,~94 1,331 18,639 4,223 4,154 3,725 429 69 937 293 0 0-19 48 124 66 20-99 20-99 0-19: 504: 504: 0: 0-19: 20-95~ 100-24 4,95~ 50 35 111 301 181 3,289 279 267 0-19 0-19 710 458 25 0 284 71 147 66 149 222 58 13 45 9 39 1!~ 1,9 19, 783 784 7~2 793 79 ex 792,3;84 8O 801 8O2 8O3 804 8O5 8O6 807,8,9 81 823,4,9 83 835 832,3,6,9 87 ex 8733 87i 872 873 ex 8733 874 89 Movie theaters Video tape rental Thea prod(ex pic),band Bowling centers Comm sport,other amuse Health services Offices/clinics,dr med Office/clinic dentists Office/clinic dr osteo Office/clinic otb prac Nursing/personal care Hospitals Other health services Legal services Select educational serv Social services Child day care service Other social services Engineer,acct,res,mgmnt Englneer,architect,sur Acc:lng,audit,bookkeep Res,devel,test,ex nonc Mgmnt and PR services Services, n.e.c. 3 17 3 1 89 380 180 82 2 63 7 1 45 147 15 50 32 18 260 68 97 4 91 13 (D) 4,840 (D) 67,451 239,583 130,024 28,022 (D) 12,341 22,987 (D) (D) 69,678 2,282 14,265 4,195 10,070 99,941 34,290 22,318 2,128 41,205 2,380 20-99 146 20-99 20-99 1,712 3~361 1,101 355 0-19 197 865 100-249 500-999 687 43 333 184 149 1,416 622 322 17 455 24 1992 Economic Census--Manufactures Geographic Area Series Geography: Collier County, FL SIC and Description Number of estab- lishments Value of shipments ($1,000) 27 271 2711 32 34 1348 3489 Ail Manufacturing Industries Printing and publishing Newspapers Newspapers Stone, clay, and glass products Fabricated metal products Ordnance and accessories, n.e.c. Ordnance and Accessories, N.E.C. 177 47 5 5 18 16 1 1 188,000 58,900 (D) (D) 33,300 33,700 (D) (D) Number of employees 2,200 600 250-499 250-499 300 500 250-499 250-499 0 AAA . .~ c~) cO C~ II I II Collier County Economic Development Collier County 1992 Census of Business Part C: Manufacturing Total: Food & K~n~red Tobacco Te~les Apparel Lumber/Wood Products Fum~,r e Pape: & Roard Pnn~n~Pubiis,hmg Chemicats Petroleum RubDec/Pla~cs Lead, er Cla¥/Glal4./Ceramic Pnmary Metals Fabricated Met~s Machines/Computer Electronics Ttansporta~on Equipment Insmumen~s Miscellaneous Number Value Establishm Employing Payroll ($ Added enta Over 20 Million) 177 19 $ 2.2 $ 47 4 $ 0.6 $ 18 25 0.3 $ 16 25 0.5 $ ($ Shipments % Value Million) (S Million) Added 107.4 $ 188.0 57% 45.1 $ 58.9 77% 14.9 $ 33.3 45% 15.7 $ 33.7 47% Page 3 COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS County - Collier S%a:e - FLORIDA - 1993 SIC code Industry Total Mid-March employees Payroll ($1,000) First quarter Annual Total Establish- men%s 07-- 10-- 15-- 20-- 40-- 50-- 52-- 60-- 70-- 99-- TOTAL 64,757 305,004 1,265,566 AGRICULTURAL 2,285 6,383 25,582 MINING 59 335 1,586 CONSTRUCTION 6,300 33,258 150,890 ~3~UFACTURING 2,250 12,848 54,556 T~-NSPORTATiO 1,796 10,721 45,331 ~OLESALE TRA 1,859 9,609 42,075 RETAIL TRADE 19,784 64,950 257,686 FINANCE, INSU 5,541 39,039 158,388 SERVICES 24,791 127,569 527,785 UNCLASSIFIED 92 292 1,687 6,571 262 9 885 211 311 1,616 88.6 2,137 74 Number of establishments by employmeDt-size class SIC code 1-4 : 5-9 : 10-19 : 20-49 : 50-99 07---- 10-- 15-- 20-- 40-- 50-- 52-- 60-- 70-- 99-- 3,g76 1,279 700 387 184 45 22 5 6 i 0 2 552 164 95 56 95 34 27 15 121 44 . . 31 11 194 68 31 15 753 398 242 131 619 145 79 30 1,384 377 170 122 68 3 3 0 136 1 0 15 5 1 2 62 7 43 0 SIC code Number of establishments by employment-size class 100-249 : 250-499 : 500-999 1000 or more 07---- I0-- 15-- 20-- 40-- 50-- 52-- 60-- 70-- 99-- 78 10 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 I ' 0 3 0 0 i 0 0 29 I 0 5 I 0 31 5 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, ect. (D)denotes figures withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies.Size class · 1 to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during Mid-~ar pay period. SIC Code Descriptions :SIC ' 'code' Industry ,---- TOTAL :07-- AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, FORESTRY, AND FISHING :10-- MINING :15-- CONSTRUCTION :20-- F33UFACTURING :40-- TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC UTILITIES :50-- WU~OLESALE TRADE :52-- RETAIL TRADE :60-- FiNaNCE, INSURANCE, AND REAL ESTATE :70-- SERVICES :99-- UNCLASSIFIED ESTAJ~LISP2~ENTS COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS - 1993 County - Collier State - FLORIDA Total Mid-March employees Payroll ($1,000) Total :Establish- Annual' ments SIC code Industry First quarter 07-- AGRICULTURAL 2,285 6,383 25,582 262 0700 Agricultural 2,236 6,095 24,372 255 0800 Forestry 33 219 947 3 0900 Fishing, hunt 16 69 263 4 Number of establishments by employment-size class siC code 1-4 : 5-9 : 10-19 : 20-49 : 50-99 07-- 184 45 22 5 1 0700 181 43 20 5 1 0800 0 2 I 0 0 09O0 3 0 Z 0 0 Number of establishments by employment-size class SIC code 100-249 : 250-499 : 500-999 : 1000 or more 07-- 3 o 2. 0 0 O7OO 3 2 0 0 O8OO 0 0 0 0 0900 0 0 0 0 Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, eot. (D)denotes figures withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies.Size class 1 to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during Mid-March pay period. SIC Code Descriptions SIC : code: Industry 07-- AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, FORESTRY, AND FISHING 0700 Agricultural services 0800 Forestry 0900 Fishing, hunting, and trapping COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS - 1993 County - Collier State - FLORIDA SIC code Industry 10-- M!NIWG Total Mid-March employees Payroll ($1,000) First quarter: Annual 1,586 (D) (D) 148 ,1000 Metal mining :1200 Coal mining 11300 Oil and gas e 11400 Nonmetallic m 59 335 0-19 (D) 0-19 (D) 9 31 20-99 (D) Total Establish- ments : 9: 4: ,SIC ...... 'code 1-4 ~ 5-9 , ,- , 10-19 : 20-49 :I0-- 6 i 0 2 :1000 1 0 0 0 :1200 1 0 O. 0 :1300 3 1 0 0 :1400 1 0 0 2 Number of establishments by employment-size class 50-99 o~ O~ 0 0 0 SIC ...... code 100-249 10-- 1000 1200 1300 !400 Number of establishments by employment-size class 250-499 ! . ., 500-999 1000 or more 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, eot. (D)denotes figures to avoid disclosing data for individual companies. Size class withheld i to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during Mid-March pay period. SIC Code Descriptions slc : code; I0-- MINING Industry IC00 Metal mining !200 Coal mining 1300 Oil and gas extraction !4C0 Nonmetallic minerals, except fuels COUNTY BU$INTS$ PATTERNS - 1993 County - Collier State - FLORIDA 'SIC :code Industry :15-- CONSTRUCTION Total Mid-March employees 6,300 Payroll ($1,000) T-- First quarter Annual 33,258 150,890 Total Establish- ments 885 .1500 General contr 1,624 9,918 47,282 263 :1600 Heavy constru 531 2,852 13,232 53 11700 Special trade 4 145 20,488 90,376 569 : N~ber of establishments by employment-size class s~c :--- - code: 1-4 : 5-9 ~ 10-1~ : 20-49 ; 50-99 15-- 552 164 95 56 15 1500 172 52 25 11 1 1600 23 14 9 6 1:' 1700 357 98 61. 39 Number of establishments by employment-size class SIC ........... code 100-249 : 250-499 : 500-999 : 1000 or more 15-- 3 0 0 0 1500 2 '0' 0 0 1600 0 0 0 0 1700 1 0 0 0 Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, eot. (D)denotes withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies. Size class figures I to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during Mid-March pay period. SiC Code Descriptions SlC : code: Industry !5-- CONSTRUCTION 1500 General contractors and operative builders 1600 Heavy construction, except building 1700 Special trade contractors COUNTy BUSINESS PATTERNS - 1993 County - Collier · ~..~tate - FLORIDA SIC code Industry 50-- WHOLESALE TRA 5000 Wholesale tra 5100 Wholesale tra 519\ Adml~%strativ Total Mid-March employees ....... Payroll ($1,000) First quarter: 1,859 9,609 42 075 992 5,202 ' 311 500-999 23,659 !95 0-19 (D) (D) 114 ._ (D) (D) ' , NUmber of establishments by employment-size class 'code: :50-- 194 :5000 124 68 :5100 69 42 31 :519~ I 26 21 7 -- 0 9 8 0 , Total 'Establish- Annual: men=s SiC code 50-- 5000 5100 519\ Number of 100-249 1 0 1 0 establishments by emPloyment-size class 250-499 , ' 500-999 ~ 0. 0 0 0 0 , 50-99 'SIC ' 'code~ Industry :50-- WHOLESALE TRADE 15000 Wholesale trade - durable goods 15100 Wholesale trade - nondurable goods 1519\ Administrative and auxiliary 2 1 1 0 1000 or more 0; --- o 0 o: Excludes govemmen~ em~lo ...... 0 0' Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companieS.size class gures ' 1 to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during M/d-March pay period. ~ z=es, self-emPloyed Persons, ect. (D)denotes fi SIC Code Descriptions COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS - 1993 County - Collier State - FLORIDA SIC code Industry Payroll ($1,000) Total: Mid-March: employees: Firs% quarter Annual Total Establish- ments 52-- RETAIL TRADE 5200 Building mate 5300 General merch 5400 Food stores 5500 Automotive de 5600 Apparel and a 5700 Furniture and 5800 Eating and dr 5900 Miscellaneous '.99\ Administra~iv 19,784 64,950 257,686 795 3,692 16,777 1,507 4,841 22,366 3,687 9,948 40,016 1,512 8,056 36,105 1,800 5,319 20,184 1,330 6,913 27,144 6,955 17,775 61,043 2,150 8,041 32,419 48 365 1,632 1,616 66 22 159 139 233, 217: 389: 382: 9: : Number of establishments by emplcymen~-size class szc : codel 1-4 : 5-9 : 10-19 : 20-49 : 50-99 52---- 5200 5300 5400 5500 5600 5700 5800 5900 599\ 753 398 242 131 62 29 20 9 4 3 5 2 3 2 0 55 48 28 7 8 53 50 18 13 3 99 75 48 8 3 125 56 . 26 8 2 136 65 ' 73 70 41 247 78 36 19 2: 4 4 I 0 : Number of establishments by employment-size class szc : ..... code: 100-249 : 250-499 : 500-999 : 1000 or more 52-- 29 I 0 0 5200 1 0 0 0 5300 10 0 0 0 5400 12 I 0 5500 2 0 0 ~, 5600 0 0 0 0 5700 0 0 0 0 5800 4 0 0 0 5~00 0 0 0 0 599\ 0 0 0 0 Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, eot. (D)denotes figures withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies.Size class 1 to 4 includes establishments having payroll bu= no employees during Mid-March pay period. _~.~SIC Code Descriptions SIC : code: Industry 52-- RETAIL TRADE 5200 Building materials and garden supplies 5300 General merchandise stores 5400 Food stores 5500 Automotive dealers and service stations 5600 Apparel and accessory stores 5700 Furniture and homefurnishings stores 5800 Eating and drinking places 5900 Miscellaneous retail 599\ Administrative and auxiliary COUNTY BUSINESS PATTERNS - 1993 County - Collier 5tare - FLORIDA SlC ~ code: Industry 60-- FINANCE, INSU Total Mid-March employees Payroll ($1,000) First quarter Annual Total Establish- ments 886 6000 Depository in 6100 Nond~pository 6200 Security and 6300 Insurance car 6400 Insurance age 6500 Real estate 6700 Holding and o 679\ Admlnistratlv 5,541 39,039 158,388 1,613 10,671 41,680 20-99 (D) (D) 304 5,778 24,111 74 976 3,953 501 3,447 13,447 2,475 12,065 48,905 469 5,237 21,777 20-99 (D) (D) 89 30 50. 25: 96: SIC code 60---- ...... Number of establishments by emplo.vment-size class 1-4 : 5-9 : 10-19 J 20-49 : 50-99 619 145 79 30 6000 25 28 26 4 6100 24 4 2 0 6200 31 11 3 5 6300 22 I i 1 6400 65 18 6 6 6500 427 78 38 6700 25 5 . 3 1 679\ 0 0 ' 0 1 SIC ....... Number of establishments by employment-size class code 100-249 ~ 250-499 . --- . 500-999 : 1000 or more 60-- 5 I 0 0 6000 2 i 0 0 6100 0 0 0 0 6200 0 0 0 0 63OO 0 0 0 0 6400 0 0 0 0 65O0 1 0 0 0 3: 0: 0: 0: 1: 3 o 0 6700 2 0 0 679\ 0 0 0 Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, eot. (D)denotes figures withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies.Size class ! to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during Mid-March pay period. SIC Code Descriptions 'sic : : code: Industry 60-- FINkNCE, INSURANCE, AND REAL ESTATE 6000 Depository institutions 6100 Nondepository institutions 6200 Security and commodity brokers 6300 Insurance carriers 6400 Insurance agents, brokers, and service 6500 Real estate 6700 Holding and other investment offices 679\ Admlnistrat~ve and auxiliary COUNTY BUSINESS States To%als State - FLORIDA PATTERNS - 1993 SIC code: Industry : Payroll : Total: Mid-March: employees: First quarter ($1,ooo) Annual Total: Establish-: me~%s' .... TOTAL 4,805,683 24,067,759 104,103,205 07-- AGRICULTURAL 51,012 172,605 757,960 10-- MINING 7,267 57,465 250,142 15-- CONSTRUCTION 288,542 1,420,179 6,348,342 20-- ~-LNUFACTURING 477,485 3,104,275 13,029,960 40-- T.~ANSPORTATIO 293,148 2,079,195 8,737,665 50-- WHOLESALE TRA 296,822 1,952,565 8,440,831 52-- R/TAIL TR~E 1,193,568 3,741,799 15,882,449 60-- FINANCE, INSU 375,856 2,547,913 10,574,906 70-- SERVICES 1,817,106 8,978,641 40,012,116 99-- UNCLASSIFIED 4,877 13,122 68,834 384,727 7,878 298 35,945 16,805 14,692 31,821 90,103 40,583 142,117 4,485 Nmmber of establishments by emp!cyme.nt-size class SIC code 1-4 : 5-9 : 10-19 : 20-49 : 50-99 .... 223,078 75,179 43,296 27,026 07-- 5,345 1,394 736 279 !0-- 142 46 39 40 15-- 22,048 6,658 4,160 2,311 20-- 7,335 3,158 2,498 2,064 40-- 8,531 2,355 . 1,541 1,220 50-- 18,364 6,095 ° 4,059 2,390 52-- 42,871 21,656 11,911 8,482 60-- 26,239 7,037 4,068 2,211 70-- 88,002 26,580 14,220 8,009 99-- 4,201 200 64 20 9,175 74 12 522 841 534 615 3,217 626: 2,734: o: SIC code Number of es%abllshments by employment-size class 100-249 : 250-499 : 500-999 1000 or more .... 5 , 331 1,023 367 07-- 35 13 2 10-- 17 1 0 15-- 199 38 6 20-- 610 187 72 40-- 362 84 37 50-- 245 41 10 52-- 1,797 137 27 60-- 280 78 28 70-- 1,786 444 185 9~-- 0 0 0 252 0 1 3 4O 28 2 16 157 0 Excludes gove~ment employees, self-employed persons, ect. (D)denotes figures withheld to avoid disclosing data for indiv~dual companies.Size class · I to 4 includes establishments hav~ng payroll but no employees during Mid-Mar '%,.- pay period. SIC Code Descriptions SIC : code: Industry .... TOTAL 07-- AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, FOPdgSTRY, AND FISHING 10-- MINING 15-- CONSTRUCTION 20-- MANUFACTURING 40-- TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC UTILITIES 50-- WHOLESALE TRADE 52-- RETAIL TRADE 60-- FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND PEAL ESTATE 70-- SERVICES 99-- UNCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS Number of establishments by employment-size class s~c code 100-249 : 250-499 : 500-999 : 1000 or more 20---- 2000 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 3000 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 399\ 3 I 0 ;-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: Excludes govemment employees, self-employed persons, eot. (D)denotes figures withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies. Size class 1 to 4 includes establishments having payroll but no employees during Mid-March pay period. · - SIC Code Descriptions sic : code: Industry 20-- M-MfUFACTURING 2000 Food and kindred products 2200 Textile mill products 2300 Apparel and other textile products 2400 Lumber and wood products 2500 Furniture and fixtures 2600 Paper and allied products 2700 Printing and publishing 2800 Chemicals and allied products 3000 Rubber and miscellaneous plastics products 3200 Stone, clay, and glass products 3300 Primary metal industries 3400 Fabricated metal products 3500 Industrial machinery and equipment 3600 Electronic and other electronic equipmen~ 3700 Transportation equipment 3800 Instruments and related products 3900 Miscellaneous manufacturing industries 399\ Administrative and auxiliary /%) 4,4 (~ ~,) (~ d~ 0 0 c 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 ¢o~r ¢ou~ Economic Develo~meel Collier County Income Range Compaflslon 1990 Florida % Collier Total Households S,134J$9 100.0% Sl,703 Under $S,OOO 313,672 6% 2,352 SS-IO,O00 459,023 9% 2,020 S 10-15,000 509,063 10% 4,470 S15-2S,000 1,031,665 20% 10,~3 S2S~S,O~ 8~g,g~o 1~4 10,920 S3S-~,000 882.668 1~ 11,730 S~-7S.~0 6~0,756 13% 9,307 S7S400,~0 2~0.036 4% 3.~87 S ~ oo.~ ~,~o ~ 18,~0 ~ 2.782 S1~-2~,~0 47,~3 I% 1.493 S2~-~0,~ ~,~62 0% ~12 S~o.oo~ 9.868 ~ 481 Median Income: S 27,S14 S 34,110 Income Range Compartslon 1996 Floricla % Collier Total Households $.733.376 100% 76,0~ U~er SS.~ 2~,571 4% 2~32 S~0~ ~8,~23 8% 3.525 $I0-1S,~ ~8.4gg 8% 4.339 S~2S.~ 0~8.~25 17% ~1,451 S2~S,~ 913,075 16% 12.410 S3~.~ 1,020.~4 18% 15,161 S~-75.~ 931.318 16% 13.~9 $100-1~,~ 216~01 4% S1~.2~,~0 55.633 I% 1,574 $2~.~0,0~ 27,4~ 0% 1,058 $~,~ 13,982 .~ 678 Median Income S 31,981 $ 38,T76 Income Range CompaHsion 2001 % 100.0% 4% 5% 7% 18% 18% 19% 15% 5% I% I% 124.~% % 100% 3% 6% 15% 16% 2¢% 18% 8% 6% 2% 1% 1% 121.2% Flor~cla % Collier Total Households 6,199,S2S 100% 87,~S 100% Under S$,000 219.296 4% 2.153 2% $5-10,000 479.~4 8% 4.{~ S10-15,000 450.190 ~/. 4,104 S15-25,000 947,827 15% 11,4~1 13% S2S-3S,000 g36,g76 15% 12.6S4 14% S35-S,0,000 1,076,950 17% 17.202 20% S50-75,000 1,144,594 18% 18.123 21% $75-100,000 480.000 8% 7,797 S100-150,000 347,053 6% 6.395 7% $1~0-25~),000 69.697 1% 1,791 2% S2 S0..~00,000 30.521 0% 1,054 I% $ 5~o,ooo+ 16.857 0% 778 1 Median Income: S 35.7~1 S 42,321 118 3% S~te V~c ~ -2.3% -4.2% -2.7% -2.4% 0.8% 1.8% 2.2% 1.4% 2.2% 1 I 0.6% -1 -3.5% -2.5% -2 3% 04% 2.0% 1.6% 1.6% 2.0% 1.1% 0.9% 0.6% Oifff re~'~ -1.1% -3.1% -2.6% -2.2% -0.6% 2.3% 2.2% 1.2% 1.7% 0.9% 0.7% 0.6% E E Page 6 Collier Counly Economic Development Collier County Household Age Group Comparision By Age of HouseholCer 1990 Florida % Collier % I~ffer~c~ Total Households 5,134,859 100% $%703 100% Under 25 258,204 5% 2,411 4% -1.1% 25 to 35 976,502 19% 9,927 18% -2.9% 35 to 45 977,174 19% 10,239 17% .2.4% 45 to 55 725,561 14% 8,109 13% -1.0% 55 to 60 329,188 8% 4,128 7% 0.11% 60 to 65 389,275 8% 5,749 9% 1.7% 65 to 70 4110,929 8% 6,809 11% 2.6% 70 to 75 403,625 8% 6,095 10% 2.0% 75 to 80 315,456 6% 5,095 10% 3.7% 80 to 65 204,191 4% 2,~.14 4% 0.3% 85* 124,763 2% 1.311 2% -03% Household Age Group Compartsion Age of Householder 1996 Florida % Collier % Total Households 5,733,375 100% 76,022 100% Under 25 275,1194 5% 2,809 4% .1.1% 25 to 35 967,912 17% 10,752 14% -2,7% 35 to 45 1,113,1182 19% 12,528 17% -2.5% 45 to 55 9116,484 16% 11,557 15% -1.1% 55 to 60 352,870 5% 5,021 7% 0 60 to 65 383,107 7% 6.307 8% 1.5% 65 to 7O 452,475 8% 8,118 11% 2.5% 70 to 75 435,070 8% 7.252 10% 2.0% 75 to 80 381,588 7% 5,787 8% 1.0% 80 to 85 256,093 '4% 3,579 5% 0.4% 85* 157,901 3% 1,902 3% -0.3% Souse' Clanta$ In¢ Household Age Group Comparision By Age of Householder 2001 Florida % Collier % I:~tr~'~e Total Households 6,199,525 100% 87,565 100% Under 25 297,864 5% 3.224 4% -1.1% 25 to 35 899,552 15% 10,523 12% -2.5% 35 to 45 1,195,056 19% 14,528 17% -2.7% 45 to 55 1,143,6~g 18% 15.014 17% -1.3% 55 to 60 443,392 7% 6,493 7% 0.3% 60 to 65 414,939 7% 7.253 8% 1.5% 65 to 70 459,943 7% 8,708 10% 2.5% 70 to 75 448,405 7% 7.999 9% 1.9% 75 to 80 426,852 7% 6,899 8% 1.0% 80 to 85 283,537 5% 4,370 5% 0.4% 85+ 185,316 3% 2,454 3% -0.2% Page 7 l[lill ll[tttlltlillltl lltlltlllt iii ti! Collier Cour~ Economic Deveropment Table: Employment One Collier County Employment Employment by Year 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Industry A gnc u~Jra [/F or e~'y/F ~,hjn g 12,311 12,919 't3,209 11.697 10,683 ~.;i~,~g 68 65 58 54 35 Con$~'IJc~on 6,411 5.657 6,317 6,924 7,206 M=n~.c.~v~ 2,286 2,025 2,018 2,195 2,299 Tra nst3 orta ~on/C o m mumca ~ons/Public L,~li~e$ 1,914 1.886 1,933 1,913 2.027 wh¢~sale Traoe 1,650 1.742 1,645 1.790 1,973 ReTail Tra(3e 15,504 15,9~0 17.117 18,298 18,795 F~na nce~l n~urance~R e =,1 Estate 4,512 4,513 4.774 4,670 4,541 Senates 21,204. 20,714 22,102 23.115 24,451 c~oYernrnen~ 6,785 6.961 7,168 7,562 7,844 Total: 72,~.45 72,472 76.341 78,215 79,~55 Source Fl(:n'da De~a~nent of Le~o~' and Employment Secure'y, E$.202Progra~1 Page 1 Collier County Economic Development Table: Employment Four Collier County Employment Average Wages le91 19~2 le~a 1ss4 Industry A gric~ Ir a VF o~es~',f/F~h~ng $ 8,067 Mining $ 33,488 con~uc=on $ 23.258 Menufactunng $ 24 001 Trens~oocLa:,~o~CommunlCa~Or'ts/~t/blic U'dli'oes $ 23,~74 Wholesale Trade $ 28,363 Ret3il Trade $ 14,116 Finance/In~urance./Real Es,ate $ 29,531 settees S 21,127 C;overnment $ 26,204 Total: $ 18,197 9,046 $ 9.142 $ 9,991 33,606 $ 39,241 $ 38,710 24.125 $ 24,875 $ 25.170 25,958 $ 26,447 $ 29,194 25,388 $ 26,172 $ 26.778 30.692 $ 29,818 S 31.862 14,768 $ 15.306 $ 15.409 33,025 $ 35,101 $ 34,889 22,431 $ 23,449 $ 24,503 27,8c~4 $ 28,027 $ 27,963 19,222 $ 19,941$ 20,896 $ 22.485 $ 23,053 To:al less Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing $ 20,522 $ 21,720' $curce F/cn~a De=a,.,'.,"ne~,t of Labor anti Employmenf Secun~y. ES.2C2Prcg~am Table: Employment Five Collier County Employment Average Wages by Quarter ~995 First Second Third Fourth Industry Jan-Feb-Mat A0t-Ma~t-June Ju~Aug. Sept Oc'l-Nov. Oe¢ Agdcu/turaFForesm//F"rs~ing $ 2..487 $ 2,677 S 3,189 S 2,536 Mining $ 8,236 $ 7,849 $ 7,658 $ 6,286 Cor~'ruc~on $ 6,402 $ 6,359 $ 6,278 $ 6,778 Manufacturing $ 7,316 $ 7,086 $ 6,807 $ 8,133 Transpor'~a',~o~Communical:ioca./Put)licU'aT~es $ 7,058 $ 6,875 $ 6,967 $ 6,963 Wholesale Trade $ 7,014 $ 8,224 $ 8,226 $ 9,218 Retail Trade $ 3,923 $ 3,928 S 3,834 S 4,206 Financa!lnsurance/RealE~ate S 9,434 $ 11.422 $ 9,185 S 9,695 Se~ces S 5,899 $ 6,427 S 5,926 $ 7,275 Government $ 6,485 $ 8,181 $ 6,431 S 7,336 Total: $ 5,140 $ 5,586 $ 5,511 $ 5,891 Scurce Fioc,'a DeDa~,,~ent of Labor and Employment Secu~.~y, ES.202=,"c~,'~m C C 1990 Census of Population and Housing 040 Florida ~._ 050 Collier County URB~.N AND RURAL P~SIDENCE Total population ............................................... Urban population .............. i ...... Percent of total popu ...... ' .................... Rural population .................................................... Percent of total population ..................................... Farm population ................................................... SCHOOL ENROLLMENT Per~ons 3 years and over enrolled in school. Preprimary school ................... Elementary or high school .............................. Percent in private school ........ ' ................. College ................................. EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Persons 25 years and over ......................................... Less than 9th grade ................................................. 9th to 12th grade, no diploma ..................... High school graduate .......... : .......... ' ................. Some college, no degree. ' .......................... Associates degree. ' ........................................... Bachelor's degree.' ................................................. Graduate cr professional degree. ' ........... : ..................... Percent high school graduate or higher .... Percent b%chelor's degree or higher. ' ......................... RESIDENCE IN 1985 Persons 5 years and over ............... Lived in same house ........ ' ...................... Lived in different house in U.S ........ o ............................. Same State ........................................................ Same county ..................................................... Different county ........................... Different State ............. '''' Lived abroad ........................................................ DISABILITY OF CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS Persons 16 to 64 years ........................................ ................... ..... W~=~ a sel~-care limitation ....................................... Wish a work disability .............................................. In labor force ............................................. Prevented from working ................................ ~.~ ..... ~.~ Persons 65 years and over ..................................... with a mobility or self-care limitation ............................. Wi%h a mobility limitation ............................ W!'~ a se~ care limitation ................... ' ........... Pag. 152,09 118,10 77. 33,99 22. 31 27,49 2,30' 20,03: 5.! $,14~ 110,30~ 9,22~ 13,902 33,254 22,813 6,475 16,428 8,209 79!l 22.~ 143,129 56,736 82,200 43,630 33,247 10,383 38,570 4,193 89,184 2,944 1,445 2,119 6,274 2,768 2,797 33,875 3,842 2,810 2,367 1990 Census of Popula=!on and Housing 040 Florida 050 Collier Ccun=y CHILDREN EVER BORN PER 1,000 WOrN Women 15 to 24 years ................................................ Women 25 to 34 years ................................................ Women 35 to 44 years ................................................ VETEr~AN STATUS Civilian veterans 16 years and over ............................. ~... 65 years and over ................................................. NATIVITY AND PLACE OF BIRTH Native po;ulation ................................................... Percent born in state of residence .............................. Fcrelgn-born population ............................................. Entered the U.S. 1980 to 1990 ..................................... LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME Perscns 5 years and over ........................................ Speak a language other than English ................................. Do not speak English 'very well'. ............................... Speak Spanish ..................................................... Do not speak English 'very well'. ............................... Speak Asian or Pacific Island language ....... ' ...................... Dc not speak English 'very well'. ............................... ~NCESTRY Total ancestries reported ......................................... Arab ................................................................ Austrian ............................................................ Belgian ............................................................. Canadian ............................................................ Czech ............................... , ................................ Danish .............................................................. Dutch ............................................................... English ............................................................. Finnish ............................................................. FrEnch (excep~ Basque) .............................................. French Canadian ..................................................... German .............................................................. Greek ............................................................... Hungarian... ........................................................ Irish ............................................................... Italian ............................................................. Lithuanian .......................................................... Norwegian ........................................................... Polish .............................................................. Portuguese .......................................................... Romanian ............................................................ Russian ............................................................. Scotch-Irish ........................................................ Page 2 352 1,275 1,923 23,408 10,276 136,196 21.2 15,903 8,185 143,12g 24,629 11,687 17,229 8,864 230 105 183,471 353 264 815 812 908 4,295 27,813 435 7,349 1,508 36,305 670 1,420 26,111 10,580 682 2,071 5,010 40! 201 1,496 4,354 1990 Census of Population and Housing 040 Florida 050 Collier County Scottish ............... Suhsaharan African .................................................. Swedish ........... ~ ................................................. Swiss ............................................................... Ukrainian ........................................................... United States or American ........................................... Welsh ............................................................... West Indian (excluding Hispanic origin groups) ...................... Yugoslavian ......................................................... Other ancestries .................................................... Page ! 4,994 1,451 79 3,272 722 292 5,358 1,717 2,286 354 28,595 1990 Census of Population and Housing 040 Florida 050 Collier County LABOR FORCE STATUS Persons 16 years and over ........................... In labor force ...................................................... Percent in labor force ........................................ Civilian labor force .............................................. Employed ........................................................ Unemployed ...................................................... Percent unemployed ............................................ Armed Forces .......... Not in labor force ...... ][ii[ ....................................... Males 16 years and over ....................................... In labor force ...................................................... Percent in labor force ....................................... Civilian labor force ' Employed ......................... Unemployed ..................... ' .......... ] ................... Percent unemployed ........... i]i]i~]][~[.~][[~]]~[]~]~]~]~ Armed Forces ..................... Not in labor force. ' ................................ Females 16 years and over ............... ~ ..................... In labor force .................................... . ................... Percent in labor force Civilian labor force ........................................ Unemployed ....................... Percent unemployed ............................................ Armed Forces ...................................................... Not in labor force .................................................. Females 16 years and over ..................................... With own children under 6 years .......................... Percent in labor force ............................................ With own children 6 to 17 years only .................... Percent in labor force ............................................ Own children under 6 years in families and subfamilies... Al! parents present in household in labor force ..................... Own children 6 to 17 years in families and subfamilies .......... All parents present in household in labor force ..................... Persons 16 to 19 years .......................................... Not enrolled in school and not high school graduate ................. Employed or in Armed Forces ....................................... Unemp!oved. Not in labor force ....................................... Page i 124,687 71,325 57.2 71,232 68,449 2,783 3.9 93 53,362 61,306 39,634 64.6 39,541 38,069 1,472 3.7 93 21,672 63,381 31,691 50.0 31,691 30,380 1,311 4.1 0 31,690 63,381 7,313 66.0 7,403 80.2 10,401 6,703 18,399 13,562 6,059 946 585 53 3O8 1990 Census of Population and Eousing 040 Florida 050 Collier County COMMUTING TO WORK Workers 16 years and over ......................................... Percent drove alone ................................................. Percent in carpools ................................................. Percent using public transpor%ation ................................. Percent using other means ........................................... Percent walked or worked at home .................................... Mean travel time to work (minutes) .................................. OCCUPATION Employed persons 16 years and over ................................ Executive, administrative, and managerial occupations ............... Professional specialty occupations .................................. Technicians and related support occupations ......................... Sales occupations ................................................... Administrative suppor~ occupations, including clerical .............. Private household occupations ....................................... Protective service occupations ...................................... Service occupations, except protec:ive and household ................ Farzlng, forestry, and fishing occupations .......................... Precision production, craft, and repair occupations ................. Machine operators, assemblers, and inspectors ....................... Transportation and material moving occupations ....................... Handlers, equipment cleaners, helpers, and laborers ................. INDUSTRY Employed person 16 years and over ................................. Agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ................................ Mining ' . ....................... Cons%ruction ........................................................ Manufacturing, ncndurable goods ..................................... Manufacturing, durable goods ......... . ............................... Transportation ...................................................... Communications and other public utilities ........................... Wholesale trade ..................................................... Re~all trade .............................................. ~ ......... Finance, insurance, and real estate ..................... ~ ........... Business and repair services ........................................ Persona! services ................................................... Entertainment, and recreation services .............................. Health services ..................................................... Educational services ................................................ Other professional and related services ............................. Public administration ............................................... Page 2 67,195 74.0 16.1 1.8 1.3 6.0 18.8 68,449 9,168 6,828 1,764 9,755 9,312 388 1,455 9,277 4,800 8,818 1,744 2,397 2,743 68,44~ 5,251 180 8,517 1,237 2,105 2,282 1,318 1,960 13,630 7,219 3,570 4,811 2,201 4,454 3,155 4,014 2,545 1990 Census of Population and Housing 040 Florida 050 Collier County CLASS OF WORKER Employed persons 16 years and over ................................ Private wage and salary workers ..................................... Government workers .................................................. Local government workers .......................................... State government workers .......................................... Federal government workers ........................................ Self-employed workers ............................................... Unpaid far ily workers ............................................... Page 68,449 55,344 6,743 4,897 1,069 777 5,902 454 1990 Cert.~ 040 050 INCOME I Househ¢ Less %ha! 55,000 t( 510,000 515,000 $25,000 $35,000 $50,000 575,000 $150,000 Median h~ Famil Less tha $5,000 $I0,000 $15,000 $25,000 $35,000 550,000 $75,000 5100,000 $150,000 Median f~ Less $5,000 $10,000 ti $15,000 ti $25,000 ti 535,000 ti 550,000 t~ $75,000 $!00,000 5150,000 Median no Per capit of Population and Housing ;rtda ~lller County 989 sg,ggg .................................................... 514,999 .................................................. $24,ggg .................................................. 534,999 .................................................. $4g,ggg .................................................. 574,ggg .................................................. 5gg,ggg .................................................. $!49,999 ................................................ r more .................................................... ;ehold income (dollars) ................................... more .................................................... ly income (dollars) ...................................... households .............................................. 5,000 ........ : ........................................... 99.................................................... $14,999 .................................................. $24,999 .................. % ............................... $34,999 .................................................. $49,999 .................................................. $74,999 .................................................. 599,999 .................................................. $!49,999 ................................................ more .................................................... household income (dollars) ......................... (dollars) ......................................... Page I 61,646 2,360 2,945 4,463 10,977 10,937 11,710 9,270 3,355 2,764 2,865 34,001 44,136 1,123 1,300 2,545 7,046 7,793 8,960 7,653 2,894 2,325 2,497 38,42t 17,510 1,387 1,802 2,028 4,032 3,103 2,609 1,348 412 425 364 23,317 21,386 1990 Cen: 040 Fl, O5O INCOME HCU With wage Mean wa With ncnf Mean noi With farm Mean fa With Soci Mean $o¢ With Dub Mean pul With re: Mean re' PCVERTY Al! per: Below Persons 1 Below Persons Below Related Below Related Below Related Below Unrelated Below All fam Below With re! Below With rel Below Female h Below With re!a~ Below With rel Below of Population and Housing ~ida :ollier County IN 19~9 salary income ......................................... and salary income (dollars) ............................. !m self-employment income ................................. ~arm self-employment income (dollars) ..................... elf-employment income .................................... self-employment income (dollars) ........................ Security income ......................................... Security income (dollars) ............................. assls=ance income ....................................... assistance income (dollars) ........................... ~ment income .............................................. [remen= income (dollars) .................................. IN 1989 for whom poverty status is determined ................. overty level ............................................. ,ears and over ........................................... level ............................................ 5 'ears and over ......................................... level .............................................. under 18 years ..................................... level ............................................. hildren under 5 years .................................... ty level ............................................. hlldren 5 to 17 years .................................... level ............................................. iduals .................. . ............................. level )verty ......................................... children under 18 years ................................ ;verty level ............................................. ed children under 5 years ............................... verty level ............................................. seholder families ....................................... verty level ............................................. children under 18 years ................................ verty level ............................................. :ed children under 5 years ............................... verty level ............................................. Page 2 61,646 41,411 38,094 8,84O 27,001 652 11,629 23,721 9,661 2,066 4,753 13,963 16,284 149,934 15,762 120,072 10',144 33,875 1,712 29,678 5,482 8,801 1,744 20,877 3,738 26,137 5,087 44,136 2,829 16,036 2,219 7,144 1,286 4,161 916 2,668 871 916 467 1990 Cen. 040 Fi, 050 of Population and Housing ier County ent below poverty level: Page All Persons Perso Related Relat Relat~ Ail lam With re With Female With re With 65 'ears and over ....................................... under 18 years ................................... children under 5 years .................................. children 5 to 17 years .................................. individuals ............................................. children under ........... ~lated children under 5 3rears ............................. r families ......................................... children under 18 years .............................. ilated children under 5 years ............................. 10.5 8.4 5.1 18.5 19.8 17.9 19.5 6.4 13.8 18.0 22.0 32.6 51.0 1990 Cer O4O O5O To YEAR 1989 to !985 to 1980 to 1970 to 1960 to 1950 to 1940 to 1939 or BEDROOMS No bedro( 1 bedro¢ 2 bedro¢ 3 bedro, 4 bedr¢ 5 or mcr~ SELECTED Lacking Lacking c Condcmini SOURCE Public sy Individua Individua Some o~he SEWAGE Public Septic Other mea HOUSE HEA Utility g~ Bottled, t Electrici Fuel oil Coal cr Wood ..... Solar ene Other fuell No fuel us~ of Population and Mousing rida Collier County housing units ........................................... BUILT itch 1990 .................................................. ;88 ........................................................ 79 49. i;;iiii: .......... i ..................................... RISTIC$ plumbing facilities ................................ :plete kitchen facilities ............ . ..................... housing units ........................ ' ................... em or private company .................................... drilled well ............................................. dug well ................................................. source ................................................... or cesspool ............................................. housing units ........................................ FUEL · or LP gas ............................................ · etc ......... .. .' . Page 71255 19,980 21,127 30,099 10,760 3,416 727 80! 1,484 9,545 46,845 30,800 4,803 688 3O6 336 35,064 84,750 8,815 401 199 74,265 19,311 589 61,703 882 2,005 57,441 430 5 212 36 17 675 1990 Ce: 040 O50 I~EAR HO[ 1989 to 1985 to 1980 to 1970 to 1960 to 1959 or s of Population and Housing rida Collier County HOLDER MO'WED INTO UNIT 'ch 1990 .................................................. 184 o °o o o Lrlier ..................................................... Page ! 16,42( 23,03~ 9,63: 10,26~ 1,84~ 50' No telep VEHIC Occupi None 3 or Specifie, With a Less $300 $500 $700 $1,0~ $I, $2, Med: No% Less $I00 $200 $300 $400 Medll SELECTED Specifie~ Less 20 to 2' 25 to 2 30 to 3 35 No~ com ne in unit ................................................ 2,961 housing units ............................................ 61,70~ 3,23~ 25,68~ 25,58~ 7,18~ AND SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS owner-occupied housing units .............................. iortgage ................................................... ihan $300 .................................................. $4 .o 99............... ............... o $699 ................................. ' ................... o $999 .................................................... to $1,499 ................................................ to $1,999 ................................................ or more ................................................. (dollars) .... · ............................................ ;aged ..................................................... hah $100 .................................................. $199 ..................... $299 .................... : ............................... $399 .................................................... more .................................................... (dollars) ................................................ 25,811 16,862 533 1,936 3,653 4,965 1,320 821 8,949 397 2,532 2,089 1,539 2,392 269 .NTHLY OWN'ER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD wner-occupied housing units ' 20 percent .............................................. percent .................................................. percent .................................................. percent .................................................. ~t or more ................................................ .ed...................................................... INCOME IN 1989 25,811 14,320 3,245 2,344 1,467 4,166 239 1990 Cen: 040 Fll 05O GROSS Specified Less %h $200 to $300 to $500 to $750 tO $1,000 No cash Median GROSS Specified Less 20 to 24 25 to 2! 30 to 35 Not com of Population and Housing 'ida lollier County enter-occupied housing units ............................. $200 .................................................... ~299 ...................................................... 99...................................................... 1749 ...................................................... ;999 ...................................................... more ....................... · ........ ~.nt . ~:~.~:.~.~..~.~.~ .~ . : · · A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN 1989 enter-occupied housing units ............................. 20 percent .............................................. )ercent ............. .... ............... . ................. ~ercent .................................................. ~ercent .................................................. it or more ................................................ ired ...................................................... Page 3 18,251 743 974 4,300 7,935 1,955 1,445 899 572 18,251 5,337 2,507 2,345 1,632 5,273 1,157